Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/06/2007city Council Agendc*? pI n_�►�o�n B�� NI19 Tuesday, February 6, 2007 5:30 p.m. — Closed Session CC -8 5:45 p.m. — Study Session CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting The Government Center South Coast Air Quality Management District/ Main Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Teleconference Location: 875 North Brea Blvd., Brea, CA 92821 Mayor Steve Tye Mayor Pro Tem Jack Tanaka Council Member Wen Chang Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Zirbes City Manager James DeStefano City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES Welcome to the meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. Meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public and are cablecast live on Channel 3. You are invited to attend and participate. PUBLIC INPUT Members of the public may address the Council on any item of business on the agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Council. In addition, members of the public may, during the Public Comment period, address the Council on any consent calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and within the Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Persons wishing to speak should submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk. Any material to be submitted to the City Council at the meeting should be submitted through the City Clerk. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Mayor determines otherwise. The Mayor may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and any other relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Council only once on an agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a rebuttal. Public comments must be directed to the City Council. Behavior that disrupts the orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the Council chambers. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for regular City Council meetings are available 72 hours prior to the meeting and are posted in the City's regular posting locations, on DBTV Channel 3, and on the City's website at www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us. A full agenda packet is available for review during the meeting, in the foyer just outside the Council chambers. The City Council may take action on any item listed on the agenda. ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE DISABLED A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the podium in order to make a public comment. Sign language interpretation is available by providing the City Clerk three business days' notice in advance of a meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7000 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Fridays. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of agendas, rules of the Council, CassetteNideo tapes of meetings: (909) 839-7010 Computer access to agendas: www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us General information: (909) 839-7000 THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY TIME -WARNER FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 3, AS WELL AS BY STREAMING VIDEO OVER THE INTERNET AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS MEETING WILL BE RE -BROADCAST EVERY SATURDAY AT 9:00 A.M. AND EVERY TUESDAY AT 8:00 P.M. ON CHANNEL 3, AND IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEB SITE AT WWW.CITYOFDIAMONDBAR.COM CLOSED SESSION: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 6, 2007 Next Resolution No. 2007- 06 Next Ordinance No. 01(2007) 5:30 P.M. Room CC -8 Public Comments on Closed Session Agenda ► Government Code Section 54956.9(x) — Pending Litigation — (2 Cases) (1) People of the State of Calif. v. Ratan Hospitality, LLS (Scribbles) Case No. BC351925 (2) Diamond Bar v. Southern California Edison LACSCC - No. BC351266 No. Government Code Section 54956.8 — Conference with Real Property Negotiator Property Address: Summitridge Mini -Park APN # 8701013902 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Under Negotiation: Price and Terms STUDY SESSION: 5:45 p.m., Room CC -8 No. Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Pilot Project. Public Comments CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: 6:30 p.m. Mayor Ab Kastle, Diamond Canyon Christian Church February 6, 2007 Page 2 ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Zirbes, Mayor Pro Tem Tanaka, Mayor Tye APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Suzanne Middle School Teacher Helen Papadopoulos, California Teacher of the Year for 2007 from Suzanne Middle School. NEW BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.2 Presentation of City Plaque to Mr. G's Pizzeria & Pasta Restaurant, 2767 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., (Country Hills Towne Center) as New Business of the Month, February, 2007. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 January 20, 2007 E -Waste Collection Event. 2.2 MTA Bus Route 684 Status Update. 2.3 CalTrans St. Route 60 HOV/Carpool Lane Update. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted Agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk com letion of this form is voluntary) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — February 8, 2007 — 7:00 P.M., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — February 13, 2007 — 7:00 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. February 6, 2007 Page 3 5.3 President's Day Observance — February 19, 2007 — In observance of President's Day, City Offices will be closed. City Offices will reopen Tuesday, February 20, 2007. 5.4 City Council Meeting — February 20, 2007 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr, 5.5 L.A. County Household Hazardous Waste/E-Waste Round Up — February 24, 2007 — 9:00 a.m. — 3:00 P.M. — Gateway Corporate Center, 1300 Block of Bridge Gate Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes: (a) Study Session of January 16, 2007 — Approve as submitted. (b) Regular Meeting of January 16, 2007 — Approve as submitted. 6.2 Planning Commission Minutes — December 12, 2006 - Receive and file. 6.3 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes: (a) Regular Meeting of September 28, 2006 - Receive and file. (b) Regular Meeting of November 16, 2006 — Receive and file. 6.4 Ratification of Check Register - Approve Check Register containing Checks dated January 11 through January 31, 2007 totaling $1,433,565.06. Requested by: Finance Department 6.5 Treasurer's Statement - month of December, 2006. Recommended Action: Review and approve. Requested by: Finance Department 6.6 Rejection of Claims: (a) Filed by William Schoenhofen on December 5, 2006. Recommended Action: Deny. February 6, 2007 Page 4 (b) Filed by Daniel J. Koretoff on October 27, 2006. Recommended Action: Deny. Requested by: City Clerk 6.7 Exoneration of Surety Bond No. 6042581 in the Amount of $160,000 and Bond No. 6110216 in the Amount of $8,000 Posted by Pulte Home Corp. for Tract No. 52267 to Complete Domestic and Reclaimed Water Improvements and Deck Removal. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.8 Transmittal of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2006. Recommended Action: Receive and File. Requested by: Finance Department 6.9 Request for Final Payment of $8,000 from the Coalition for Practical Regulation (CPR) for the Trash Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Appeal Litigation. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.10 Request for $6,000 from the Coalition for Practical Regulation (CPR) for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Litigation. Recommended Action: Deny. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.11 Resolution No. 2007 -XX: Approving Final Parcel Map No. 61702, for the Subdivision of a 13.69 Acre Site (Target Development) into Three Parcels Located on the Southeast Corner of Golden Spgs. Dr. and Grand Ave Rescinding Resolution No. 2007-04 in its Entirety. Recommended Action: Adopt. Requested by: Public Works Department February 6, 2007 Page 5 6.12 Award of Contract to Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. in the amount of $46,600 for Infrastructure Valuation and Asset Management System in Accordance with GASB34. Recommended Action: Award. Requested by: Finance Department 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 Public Hearing — Consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2006-03, Development Agreement 2005- 01, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Vesting Tentative Tract No. 063623, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01, Development Review No. 2005- 27 and Tree Permit No 2005-06, Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 21) and Development Code (Title 22, Sections 22.22, 22.38, 22.48, 22.58, 22.60, 22, 22.70, and 22.62). The Proposed Project Consists of a 99 -Unit Single—Family Residential Subdivision, a Public Park and Open Space Areas on Approximately 34.52 Acres, Located on Property South of Larkstone Dr., East of Morning Sun Ave., West of Brea Canyon Rd., and Northwest of Peaceful Hills Rd. (Related File: Environmental Impact ReportNo. 2005-01). Continued from December 19, 2006 and January 16, 2007. Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, Receive Additional Public Testimony and Continue to February 20, 2007. Requested by: Community Development Department 7.2 Resolution No. 2007 -XX: Consideration of a Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01, and Variance No. 2006-04, Pursuant to the Development Code Title 22, Sections 22.36.060, 22.58, and 22.54. The Proposed Project Consists of a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Country Hills Town Center, a Variance to Reduce the Required Monument Sign Setback from Property Line, and a Conditional Use Permit for Modifications to an Existing Nonconforming Pylon Sign. Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, Receive Testimony, Close the Public Hearing adopt. Requested by: Community Development Department February 6, 2007 Page 6 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 Resolution No. 2007 -XX: Amending the FY 06-07 Municipal Budget. Recommended Action: Adopt. Requested by: City Manager 8.2 Consideration of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) Pilot Project. Recommended Action: Receive Report and Approve Program Modifications. Requested by: Public Works Department 8.3 Consideration of Batting Cages at Pantera and Peterson Parks. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Community Services Department 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda No. 6.1(a) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION JANUARY 16, 2007 DRAFT STUDY SESSION: M/Tye called the Study Session to order at 5:53 p.m. in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. Present: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Zirbes (telephonically), MPT/Tanaka and Mayor Tye. Also Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Brad Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Nancy Fong, Community Development Director; Ryan McLean, Senior Management Analyst; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Alfredo Estevez, IS Technician, and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. ► AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN — presentation by Rainbow Young, Senior Public Affairs Specialist, South Coast Air Quality Management District. Ms. Young reported that AQMD is required by Federal law to draft and implement a plan to bring the region into compliance with Federal clean air standards and every three to five years the District makes revisions to its existing plan. Last year the District released the 2007 AQMP (Air Quality Management Plan), a roadmap for air quality improvement in the region. The District is launching a series of presentations to all 160 cities within the four counties section to inform cities about the plan. She hoped that D.B. would support development of the plan. She gave a slide presentation outlining the plan to reduce emissions. Included in Council's packet is a sample letter and resolution of support of the District's approach to call on the State and Federal government to act to reduce Emissions from mobile sources. M/Tye said he grew up in Southern California he realized the air was bad and people knew when the air was bad. The air quality today is immeasurably better and it is difficult for him to believe that California's air quality is the worst in the nation. Ms. Young responded that proportionately the air quality of today compared to decades ago the stationary sources versus mobile sources contributing to air pollution was about 50/50. Now because of our practices and the cooperation of the business community the pollution from that category has been drastically reduced to about 20 percent with mobile sources contributing more than 80 percent of the air pollution. New York for example, has a lot of vehicles but unlike the Southern California region there are no mountains to trap the flow of air and emissions. During the winter winds the air is clear and in summer the smog is more serious. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 2 CC STUDY SESSION C/Chang felt that California had more pollution because it had little rain. Ms. Yeung felt it was a combination of factors including the topography, the growing population and the increase in the number of vehicles. C/Chang said that he had come to California in 1981 and remembers bad air quality during the mid eighties and compared to then, today's air is much better. Ms. Yeung pointed out that the population would triple by 2020 and the air quality could be much worse if the problem was not addressed now. Ms. Yeung responded to CM/DeStefano that the District felt there was no need for the Council to wait to sign the letter or resolution until the next draft was done because there would not be significant changes. No Public Comments were given ► WI -FI PROGRAM REPORT — ACM/Doyle reported that staff has looked at different ways of providing wireless Internet access to the residents and has looked at several providers, some of which are conducting tests in the area to determine service feasibility. Staff has not yet determined whether the City could be serviced through the use of its existing infrastructure. Most cities install the devices on light poles that run through residential neighborhoods. Staff has talked with Edison during the past two years and has had absolutely no feedback. However, he would be attending an Edison presentation tomorrow during which they would be talking about their plans for Wi-Fi and whether they would look at partnering with the private sector to provide the service or open up their facilities for cities to get into and be able to attach to the provider service. At this point these are unknown options. Staff also looked at pursuing eminent domain with respect to spots on poles and what it would cost (value of the space). Staff estimates it would need about 400 poles and the lifetime value was appraised at $300 per pole for a total of $120,000 cost plus legal fees, etc. Staff is not proposing that avenue, just indicating it is an option should the City decide to proceed. Other communities that are interested in pursuing Wi-Fi are having the same problem as D.B. with Edison not returning phone calls. IST/Estevez felt that the biggest concerns were whether the City should use a mesh system with a few big transenders on very tall buildings because unfortunately, D.B. does not have many tall buildings, the tallest being three and four stories; or, should they be placed on water towers. The best method for maximizing the system seems to be by using a very fine mesh system attached onto the power poles. ACM/Doyle felt that staff would be in a better position to consider its options after hearing what Edison has to say tomorrow. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 3 CC STUDY SESSION C/Herrera asked if placing the transenders on water towers would reduce the cost. ACM/Doyle said the problem was not so much the cost as it was getting the connectivity to residences. He said it was his understanding that the fine mesh networks would transmit only from a certain distance and the signal needed to be boosted as it travels. He felt that the City would not want to propose something that was not available to all residents. Down the line policy issues would have to be considered such as, what happens with "The Country Estates" because there are very few poles in that community. Currently, options are very limited in D.B. For example, the cable company offers the broadest based coverage in the City. He is looking at this issue from the standpoint that it is a service that should be provided to all residents and how would the City accomplish that goal. ACM/Doyle responded to C/Zirbes that it was unlikely there would be an answer from Edison tomorrow and more likely Edison would talk in generalities such as there are all kinds of issues with the system and whether it could be attached to the poles when in fact there are thousands of communities that are doing this across the world. Edison said there was no tariff for Wi-Fi and that it would take 18 months to two years working with the PUC to get this turned around. Staff spoke directly with the PUC and within weeks the PUC gave staff a tariff rate. C/Zirbes suggested that staff contact other municipalities to form a coalition similar to what C/Herrera did in getting the Four Corners group together. ACM/Doyle said that he and CM/DeStefano have discussed that very thing and are particularly interested in West Hollywood and Santa Clarita because their council's have given them a mandate to get wireless into their communities on a citywide basis. He felt that if the cities decided to form a coalition and other cities saw movement in that direction a number of them would be willing to join in to try and get Edison to move forward. C/Chang felt it would be advisable to pursue Wi-Fi or Wi-Max through economic development. ACM/Doyle agreed that there were many small businesses that needed help providing the service. ACM/Doyle said staff would provide an update in the next month or two and would explore the coalition idea. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 4 CC STUDY SESSION ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the City Council, M/Tye adjourned the Study Session at 6:33 p.m. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2007. STEVE TYE, Mayor Agenda No. 6.1(b) Corrected spelling "Okitsu" JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL 6.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6.1.1 Special Meeting of December 18, 2006—as Submitted. 6.1.2 Study Session of December 19, 2006 — as Submitted. 6.1.3 Regular Meeting of December 19, 2006 — as Submitted. 6.2 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER—containing checks dated December 14, 2006 through January 10, 2007 for a total amount of $3,595.983.55. 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT — month of November 2006. 6.4 REJECTED CLAIM — filed by Isidro Ochoa on December 12, 2006. 6.5 ACCEPTED WORK PERFORMED BY ZUSSER COMPANY, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SLOPE REPAIRS AT DIAMOND BAR CENTER, DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO FILE THE PROPER NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND RELEASE THE RETENTION THIRTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER THE RECORDATION DATE. 6.6 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2007-01; CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIFIC REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. 6.7 AWARDED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO KATZ, KITSU ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ALONG SUNSET CROSSING ROAD BETWEEN DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND PROSPECTOR'S ROAD, AND ON PROSPECTOR'S ROAD BETWEEN SUNSET CROSSING ROAD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,600 PLUS A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $10,000 FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $67,600. 6.8 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH MACADEE ELECTRICAL FOR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/SR57 FREEWAY ONRAMP; DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/SUNSET CROSSING ROAD; DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/COLD SPRINGS LANE; AND, INSTALLATION OF NEW TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT PATHFINDER ROAD/PEACEFUL HILLS ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/MAPLE HILL ROAD TO MACADEE ELECTRICAL. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda No. 6.1(b) REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR JANUARY 16, 2007 CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m., Room CC -8 LJ l"h kFT CM/DeStefano requested that an additional Closed Session item added o the Closed Session. The matter is threatened litigation, a CEQA matter - Courson v. City of Diamond Bar. With consent of Council the matter was added. Public Comments on Closed Session Agenda: ► Government Code Section 54956.9(a) — Pending Litigation — Two cases 1) People of the State of California v. Ratan Hospitality, LLS (Scribbles) Case No. BC351925 2) Diamond Bar v. Southern California Edison LACSCC — No. BC351266 3) Courson v. City of Diamond Bar — CEQA matter Closed Session adjourned at 5:50 p.m. STUDY SESSION: 5:53 p.m., Room CC -8 ► Air Quality Management Plan Presentation ► Wi-Fi Program Report Study Session adjourned at 6:33 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Tye called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:42 p.m. in The Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. ACA/Wohlenberg reported that during tonight's Closed Session in addition to the two items on the agenda, Council voted to add a new matter of threatened litigation, a CEQA matter - Courson v. City of Diamond Bar, and was instructed for his office to defend the matter appropriately. The Closed Session ended at approximately 5:50 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C/Chang led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Bob Stebe, Northminster Presbyterian Church gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Zirbes (telephonically), MPT/Tanaka, and M/Tye. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Nancy Fong, Community Development Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Ryan McLean, Senior Management Analyst; Rick Yee, Senior Engineer; Kimberly Molina, Assoc. Engineer; Alfredo Esteves, IS Tech; and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. K SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: NEW BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.1 M/Tye presented a Certificate Plaque to Lilly L. Tung, Branch Manager, HSBC Bank, USA, located at 2783 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard as New Business of the Month for January 2007. A slide presentation was also displayed. Ms. Tung introduced Asst. Branch Manager Armando Gomez and Consumer Banker Jack Yu. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 CM/DeStefano introduced Vicki Cross, Human Resources Manager. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Carolyn Anderson, Waste Management, reminded residents that they can have bulky and large items such as televisions, CPU's, monitors, dishwashers, water heaters, mattresses, etc. picked up at no extra charge by calling 800-266-7551. Call by Tuesday for Wednesday pickup and place the bulky item at the curb for pickup. Bridgette DelRios Cortez, announced the Second Annual D.B. Relay for Life event for cancer survivors. The event is seeking sponsors and participants. The event will be held at Lorbeer Middle School on Saturday, June 9, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. Individuals interested in participating or sponsoring teams can call Rosie Reyes at 626-795-7774 opt 3, ext 227 or visit the website at www.acsevents.org/relay/diamondbar. Hank Fong, representing Southern California Transit Advocates, informed Council that MTA intends to cancel bus line 684. A cancellation would result in extreme hardship for travelers. He asked residents and the Council to provide their comments to the MTA Board. A public hearing on this matter is scheduled for February 12 at 6:00 p.m., 3369 Santa Ana Avenue JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL Mary Matson asked what happened to the Diamond Bar Improvement Assn. (DBIA). 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: CM/DeStefano stated that staff learned of the impending closure of Bus Route 684 today and would look into the matter and report back to the City Council. DCM/DeStefano said that the DB IA was a private organization and that staff would contact members to determine its status. C/Chang said he received several calls from concerned residents about the impending closure of the bus route. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 E -Waste Round -Up — January 20, 2007 — 9:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. AQMD/Government Center Parking Lot, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.2 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Open House — January 20, 2007 -10:00 a.m. —4:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center GB Room, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.3 Planning Commission Meeting — January 23, 2007 — 7:00 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.4 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — January 25, 2007 — 7:00 p.m., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.5 City Council Meeting — February 6, 2007 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Chang moved, C/Tanaka seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented with the exception of Item 6.15(b). Motion carried by the following Roll Call: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Zirbes (telephonically) MPT/Tanaka, M/Tye NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6..1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6.1.1 Special Meeting of December 18, 2006—as Submitted. 6.1.2 Study Session of December 19, 2006 — as Submitted. 6.1.3 Regular Meeting of December 19, 2006 — as Submitted. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL 6.2 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER — containing checks dated December 14, 2006 through January 10, 2007 for a total amount of $3,595.983.55. 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT — month of November 2006. 6.4 REJECTED CLAIM — filed by Isidro Ochoa on December 12, 2006. 6.5 ACCEPTED WORK PERFORMED BY ZUSSER COMPANY, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SLOPE REPAIRS AT DIAMOND BAR CENTER, DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO FILE THE PROPER NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND RELEASE THE RETENTION THIRTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER THE RECORDATION DATE. 6.6 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2007-01; CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIFIC REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. 6.7 AWARDED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO KATZ, OKISU & ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ALONG SUNSET CROSSING ROAD BETWEEN DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND PROSPECTOR'S ROAD, AND ON PROSPECTOR'S ROAD BETWEEN SUNSET CROSSING ROAD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,600 PLUS A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $10,000 FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $67,600. 6.8 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH MACADEE ELECTRICAL FOR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/SR57 FREEWAY ONRAMP; DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/SUNSET CROSSING ROAD; DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/COLD SPRINGS LANE; AND, INSTALLATION OF NEW TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT PATHFINDER ROAD/PEACEFUL HILLS ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD/MAPLE HILL ROAD TO MACADEE ELECTRICAL. 6.9 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH WARREN C. SIECKE TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,000 PLUS A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $3,000 FOR CHANGE ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $37,000. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL 6.10 AWARDED A THREE-YEAR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES CONTRACT FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND ARTERIAL ZONES SLURRY SEAL/CAPE SEAL PROJECTS TO NORRIS-REPKE AND APPROVED A CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $74,380 WITH A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $7,500 FOR CHANGE ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $81,880 IN FY 2006-07. 6.11 AWARDED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE 2006-07 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CURB RAMP INSTALLATION PROJECT TO AAE, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,938, AND AUTHORIZED A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $3,000 FOR CHANGE ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $32,938. 6.12 APPROVED THE SURPLUS OF A 1989 CHEVROLET S-10 PICKUP TRUCK. 6.13 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2007-02: ESTABLISHING AN APPROVED VENDOR LIST AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 05(2006) TO BE IN EFFECT FROM FEBRUARY 1, 2007 UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2008. 6.14 APPROVED ADJUSTMENT OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (JPIA). 6.15 (a) APPROVED RELEASE OF COVENANT AND AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF RESTRICTED USE AREA LOCATED ON PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14819 (TARGET PROJECT PARCEL MAP, CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE. 6.16 AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH TMG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TO DEVELOP A PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) ($80,000). 6.17 APPROVED AMENDMENT TO FY 2006-07 COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM TO REALLOCATE AND APPROPRIATE $150,000 OF PRIOR YEAR CDBG FUNDS FOR THE HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HIP) FOR A TOTAL OF $266,197 AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2007-03. ITEMS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 6.15 (b) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04: APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 21702, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A 13.69 ACRE SITE (TARGET DEVELOPMENT) INTO THREE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL GRAND AVENUE. CM/DeStefano reported that adoption of this resolution would allow for the sale of two out -parcels proposed for restaurant development. Staff is seeking an amendment to the resolution with the addition of a recital to Section II, Page 2 to wit: "That Section II of Page 2 is subject to the condition that the resolution not be signed by the Mayor and the map not be stamped approved or released for recordation until and unless the underground utility easement is executed and further, that if the undergrounding easement is not executed on or before February 6, 2007 this conditional approval will be deemed void and of no effect and further that the final map would then be scheduled for approval by the City Council." CM/DeStefano stated that Target had been working diligently with staff to reach an agreement with Edison. This resolution allows Target to move forward with the recordation of the map subject to signature by Edison on the easement document. No further action will be required of Council unless the agreement cannot be executed because the Edison signature is not obtained. This advice to add this matter to the normally ministerial act comes from the City's attorney. C/Herrera moved, MPT/Tanaka seconded the addition of the added condition read by CM/DeStefano. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera Zirbes (telephonically), MPT/Tanaka, M/Tye NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2005-01, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-01, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 63623, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2005-27 AND TREE PERMIT NO. 2005-06, PURSUANT TO THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, CITY'S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (TITLE 21) AND DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 22, SECTIONS 22.22, 22.387, 2248, 2258, 22.60, 22.70 AND 22.62). THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 99 -UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, A PUBLIC PARK AND OPEN SPACE AREAS ON APPROXIMATELY 34.52 ACRES, LOCATED ON PROPERTY SOUTH OF LARKSTONE DRIVE, WAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE, WEST OF BREA CANYON ROAD, AND NORTHWEST OF PEACEFUL HILLS ROAD. (RELATED FILE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2005-01). (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 19, 2006). JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL CM/DeStefano stated staffs recommendation was that the Public Hearing be reopened to receive additional testimony and to continue the matter to February 6, 2007 to allow time for the applicant to complete the traffic studies in the Larkstone/Lemon Avenue neighborhood. Kurt Nelson, applicant, concurred with staffs recommended continuance to February 6, 2007. M/Tye reopened the Public Hearing. John Courson, 1719 Chapel Hill Dr., reiterated his objections to the Project because in his opinion, the EIR has not discussed or identified mitigation measures for pedestrian safety in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. He also stated that in his opinion, D.B. should consider itself fortunate to be represented by the staff members working at City Hall. Sheila Kepler, 1522 Dab Court, said that she and her family moved here 30 - days ago and were pleased to learn that there is further study of the traffic impact in the project area. She said she was also concerned about the overcrowding of the schools and the natural wildlife as well as, the proposed exit -only off of Chapel Hill. She proposed that the applicant consider three ingress/egress points to the project. C/Chang moved, C/Herrera seconded to continue the matter to February 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Zirbes (telephonically), MPT/Tanaka, M/Tye NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 7.2 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2007-05: APPROVING THE FY 2007-08 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $371,372. CDD/Fong reported the CDBG annual requests to benefit low and moderate income families for public services and administration. The CDBG allocation for 2007/08 is $371,372 which is about $10,000 less than last year's allocation. Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2007-05 approving the FY 2007-08 Community Development Block Grant Program in the amount of $371,372. M/Tye opened the Public Hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, M/Tye closed the Public Hearing. JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL C/Chang moved, C/Herrera seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2007-05. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Zirbes (telephonically), MPT/Tanaka, M/Tye NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Chang reiterated that the a -waste roundup would be held on January 20, 2007 at AQMD/Government Center parking lot. He stated that during the Study Session Council discussed Wi-Fi, a program that would provide Internet service to the community without having to install hard wires. CM/DeStefano responded to C/Chang that residents could bring their used batteries to the drop off center at City Hall. C/Herrera said it was unfortunate that the City did not have more CDBG monies to parcel out to different organizations. In past years many individuals have come to Council asking for money and perhaps they have become discouraged about the lack of available dollars. C/Herrera spoke about the traffic congestion in D.B. and especially the problem of cut -through traffic and said that in response to those concerns and complaints from residents the City has put together various neighborhood traffic management programs. She encouraged residents to participate in their neighborhood traffic matters by taking advantage of presentations scheduled for January 20 in the GB Room between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. and that residents should provide their comments about the program to staff and Council Members. C/Tanaka wished everyone a Happy New Year. He said that Ken's Hardware also accepts used batteries and spent fluorescent light bulbs and tubes. At the end of the year he attended the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnerships "Merry Mingle." That evening he also attended the Senior Holiday Dinner Dance; on January 4 he attended the League of Cities LA County Division monthly meeting and last week attended the Mayors and Council Members Leadership Academy in Sacramento. M/Tye stated that last week, he, C/Herrera and CM/DeStefano were in Sacramento to speak with legislators about money for roadways. He was encouraged that Assemblyman Bob Huff was available and he was encouraged to sit with Senator Ackerman to make sure that projects important to this area and region receive attention. He concurred with C/Herrera that the Neighborhood Traffic Management Open House was an important opportunity for residents to see what is happening in JANUARY 16, 2007 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL their neighborhoods and provide feedback to staff and the City Council. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Tye adjourned the regular City Council meeting at 7:40 p.m. in memory of Coberly Neal, daughter of Etta Gahm; Patricia Sue Bolduc, Gary Neely's sister; and John Vandercrank. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2007. STEVE TYE, MAYOR Agenda No. 6.2 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Nolan led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Kathleen Nolan, Osman Wei, Vice Chairman Tony Torng and Chairman Steve Nelson. Also present: Nancy Fong, Community Development Director; Ann Lungu, Associate Planner; Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chair/Nelson moved Item 7.1 to the end of the Public Hearings. 4 CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 28, 2006. C/Lee moved, C/Wei seconded to approve the Minutes of November 28, 2006, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None Lee, Wei, Nolan, Chair/Nelson None VC/Torng None DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 2 8. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS: 8.1 Development Review DR 2006-19 — In accordance with Chapter 22.48 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code the applicant requested approval of plans to construct a new three-story 3,668 square foot single- family residence with an attached 440 square foot garage. The site is an undeveloped vacant lot; the subject property is zoned R-1 (8,000) and contains 33,327 square feet of land area. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1200 Chisholm Trail Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Anna Lee 6111 Glenwood Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 APPLICANT: Yun Roe 533 S. Saint Andrew Place, Suite 320 Los Angeles, CA 90020 AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review DR 2006-19, Findings of Fact, and Conditions of Approval as listed within the Resolution. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. C/Wei moved, C/Lee seconded to approve Development Review 2006-19, Findings of Fact, and Conditions of Approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: C/Wei recused himself from deliberation "Commonlaw" conflict and left the dais. Wei, Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson None None of Items 8.2 and 8.3 under the DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 8.2 Development Review No. 2006-13 — In accordance with Chapter 22.48 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code, the applicant requested approval of plans to demolish the existing dwelling unit and construction of a new three-story 13,730 square foot single-family residence with an attached 1,375 square foot garage. The subject property is zoned R-1 (40,000) and contains 51,836 gross square feet of land area. PROJECT ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: 2366 Clear Creek Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Lawrence and Heneretta Ogbechie 2366 Clear Creek Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AssocP/Lungu presented staffs report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2006-13, Findings of fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. Applicant George Medley, 20746 Missionary Ridge Road said he was present to answer Commission questions and concerns. Mr. Medley responded to VC/Torng that the conditions of approval were acceptable. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. C/Lee moved, C/Nolan seconded to approve Development Review No. 2006-13, Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Wei ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8.3 Development Review No. 2006-22 — In accordance with Chapter 22.48 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code, the applicant requested approval of plans to construct a new three-story 11,534 square foot single- family residence with an attached 1,236 square foot garage. The subject property is zoned R-1 (40,000) and contains 45,119 square feet of land area. DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 4 PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT: PLANNING COMMISSION 2112 Rocky View Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chacko Jacob 1801 E. Edinger Avenue, Suite 235 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Pete Volbeda, Architect 615 N. Benson Avenue, Unit C Upland, CA 91786 CDD/Fong presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2006-22, Findings of Fact, and Conditions of Approval as listed within the Resolution. Pete Volbeda, architect, explained the project and explained how there would be varying contours for a better overall appearance. For the past 15 years he has simultaneously submitted projects to the City and "The Country Estates" Homeowners Association for approval. With respect to this project he would request that he be allowed to proceed to approval and then obtain association approval in accordance with the conditions. He said he had no problem providing landscaping as required by staff. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. Steve Solis, 22615 Lazy Meadow Road, said it was his job as the General Manager of "The Country Estates" to make certain that the CC&R's were enforced. Mr. Volbeda is well aware that the CC&R's clearly state that the architectural committee must approve the plans prior to submission to the Planning Commission. As such, he respectfully requested that the Planning Commission take no action on this project until it has been presented to and approved by "The Country Estates" architectural committee. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing C/Nolan asked for clarification about the CC&R's. CDD/Fong stated that the CC&R's are a private matter and are not enforced by the City. ACA/Kovacevich explained that the Commission's only role is to determine DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION whether the proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan and Development Code. He also advised removal of Condition 5. a. (2) on page 3 of the resolution because it was an illegal condition. C/Nolan moved, VC/Torng seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2006-22, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution with the deletion of Condition 5. a. (2) of the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nolan, VC/Torng, Lee, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Wei ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None RECESS: Chair/Nelson recessed the meeting at 8:15 p.m. RECONVENE: Chair/Nelson reconvened the meeting at 8:25 p.m. C/Wei returned to the dais. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54081 Zone Chanqe No. 2006-02/Planned Development, Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2006-03, Conditional Use Permit No. 200.2-18, Variance No. 2006-02 and Tree Permit No. 2002-13 — In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, City's Subdivision Ordinance — Title 21, Development Code — Title 22, Sections 22.14, 22.58, 22.22, 22.54 and 22.38, the proposed project was a 22 lot subdivision on a site of approximately 12.9 acres that would provide for the development of 16 single-family detached homes on individual parcels ranging in size from approximately 5,705 square feet to 10,506 square feet. The proposed project would include the construction of private streets, graded pads, manufactured slopes and retaining walls; an easement for a public pedestrian trail in a portion of proposed open space areas, and the removal of a portion of existing vegetation. The current zoning of the project site is R-1-10,000. The Zone Change to RL/Planned Development Overlay provides for compliance with the General Plan land use designation and maximum flexibility in the site planning and design, thereby allowing smaller lots in order to retain more open space DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION within the project boundaries. The Conditional Use Permit relates to grading and development within a hillside area. The Variance relates to retaining walls that are proposed at a height greater than six feet. The Tree Permit relates to the removal, replacement and protection of oak and walnut trees. (Continued from November 28, 2006) PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: At the southern terminus of Crooked Creek Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Daniel Singh Jewel Ridge, LLC 10365 W. Jefferson Boulevard Culver City, CA 90232 AssocP/Lungu presented staffs report and recommended Planning Commission approval of a resolution recommending City Council approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03, Zone Change No. 2006-02/Panned Development Overlay District No. 2006-01, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54081, Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-18, Variance No. 2006-02 and Tree Permit No. 2002-13. AssocP/Lungu referenced a letter staff received today regarding the author's concerns about the project and why he believed it should not be approved. Daniel Singh stated that this was the third Planning Commission hearing on this matter in spite of the fact that staff recommended approval. The Commission was concerned about visual impacts even though the City's attorney has made it clear that the City has no view ordinance. Nevertheless, the applicant has cooperated and provided responses to Commissioner's concerns. During the second hearing the Commission was presented before and after views from three lots that back up to the proposed project, five and 10 -year simulations of what the project appearance would be and a series of photos from the northbound SR57 that confirm the site would not be visible due to the vegetation along the freeway. Also provided at the second hearing was a revised landscape plan that utilized more indigenous vegetation and landscape plan that showed the complete on-site mitigation for oak tree and oak woodland replacement. The mitigation also included dead trees. Present during the November 28 meeting was the biologist that has assisted the applicant throughout the entire process. The applicant also provided a landscape plan that illustrated DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION the modified areas. At the last hearing the Commission requested additional visual simulation of the project from the second story as well as a before and after view from the southbound SR57 and the applicant has complied. The vegetation along the freeway is the same in the depictions of the five, 10 and existing views. He reviewed the proposed project, well under the allowable maximum number of units and the project now before the Commission is a compromise based on discussions with staff and consultants. The initial project was reduced from 26 houses to 16 houses based on staffs input. The zone change request is consistent with the General Plan and is not being requested to allow an increase in density; rather, to allow a small development that preserves more open space than would not have been made available under the existing zoning. Mr. Singh stated that the applicant has made every effort to cooperate with staff and the Commission and has expended more than $15,000 attempting to respond to the Commissioner's requests. He hoped the Commission would approve the project at this time. Chair/Nelson re -opened the public hearing. Jeff Layton, 3703 Crooked Creek Drive, stated that at the last meeting he was disappointed about the applicant's presentation and was disappointed that he was not allowed to speak after the presentations were made because he understood it was to be an open hearing. He also felt the engineer was being evasive. The so-called credible biologist was not knowledgeable about basic requirements and did not make a good presentation. He felt that in general the presentation was far below expectations. He also believed that the photos presented this evening were not indicative of what would occur even within the first five years. Mr. Layton said he was concerned about the steepness of the hillside and what the project would look like from both sides of the street. Gregory Shockley, 3711 Crooked Creek Drive, said he wanted to salvage the firewood from the project. He provided photographs to the Commission that showed a large two -foot base black walnut tagged to be removed as well as other views. Mr. Shockley asked if all trees were supposed to be tagged. Most of the trees in the canopy are not tagged and wondered if they had been counted. The view from across the street shows the 18 -foot retaining wall, the six- foot fence, the tree canopy that would be gone, etc. He said he was not opposed to development of the property and would like to see the applicant do a good job. He felt that a 15 to 18 foot retaining wall was not in the best interest of the residents and Diamond Bar. He referred to his letter addressed to the Commission. DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Wei recommended that the applicant plant more mature boxed trees than the proposed 15 -gallon at the onset of the project to provide a more mature canopy. CDD/Fong responded to C/Nolan that some of the oak trees could be relocated under the direction of an Arborist. C/Nolan wanted to know if the project could consider shelved walls rather than 18 -foot retaining walls. CDD/Fong responded that the applicant could use a similar type of block with landscaping cells. However, it would change the design because those types of blocks are placed at an angle and more of the slope would be lost. Mr. Shockley explained his statements about the failure of the retaining wall as a result of potential earthquakes. Unless the epicenter of an earthquake is close to the area and there is an unreasonably high water table it is unlikely the walls will fail. However, most walls of this magnitude are on state land or on land that is controlled by a large corporation that can afford to inspect the walls on a regular basis and make appropriate repairs, and are not usually installed in areas where the slope flows down to other properties. If the retaining wall were to fail it would most likely come down onto Brea Canyon Road. He said he spoke with three engineers and one geotechnician and none said they would use this system. He may not agree with the civil engineer on all points but in many aspects he did a good job. For the most part the pads are on cut and the soil is as good as it is going to get. In his estimation, the primary reason for the retaining wall is to increase the usable rear yard. The retaining wall could be eliminated and the back yards would be on a slope as they are in "The Country Estates" which, in his opinion, would solve a lot of the problems. He said he did not agree with changing the density. He agreed with the applicant that looking from the elevation of the proposed dwellings residents would not be able to see the freeway. It is possible that the rooftops would be seen from the freeway. However, the block wall will not. He believed there were alternatives to the design plan and was disappointed that Mr. Singh felt compelled to build a retaining wall. If the retaining wall were six-foot high he believed no one would object. CDD/Fong responded to C/Lee that the distance between each of the three six-foot high retaining walls is about five feet in accordance with the Hillside Management Ordinance. AssocP/Lungu explained that the walls would have a much less massive appearance with plantings between each wall. CDD/Fong explained to C/Lee that the applicant presents his design to the DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION City and the City determines whether the design meets the development standards. ACA/Kovacevich explained that the Commission's job is to apply the code and make its recommendation to the City Council. Peter Lewandowski stated that a Certified Arborist conducted the tree survey in 2004 on behalf of the applicant and the City retained Mitch Beecham, a reputable biologist to review the accuracy of the survey. Based on Mr. Beecham's review there is no evidence to suggest that the tree survey was not conducted in full compliance with City standards. Mr. Beecham had recommendations that were subsequently incorporated. The tree survey was conducted based upon the applicant's original 26 -lot subdivision and the grading plan has since been modified. Therefore, the tree survey should not be necessarily indicative of a precise count but a close approximation. Prior to grading, another tree survey will be conducted to reflect the precise grading plan necessary to accommodate plans that Council ultimately approves. Tree tagging protocol includes tagging trees that are in compliance with the City's standards of diameter at a specified (breast) height. The tree survey is an approximation and accurately reflects what was on-site at the time of the survey. The edge of grading has been reduced and the affected number of trees is therefore likely less than the number represented in the environmental documentation. C/Lee said he felt that the applicant had not made an effort to design his project in accordance with the wishes and concerns of the residents. Mr. Singh explained that this project had been on the drawing board for four years and that there had been community meetings. C/Lee wanted to know how many meetings the applicant held. Mr. Singh responded. Mr. Singh responded to concerns about the retaining walls that a geotechnical engineer reviewed the plan and provided recommendations that were incorporated into the project. The City's consultant reviewed the soils report on a number of occasions. Both consultants recommended approval based upon the recommended mitigation. With regard to the trees the applicant is replacing trees at a 3:1 ratio and 1:1 ratio for dead trees. He said he would consider larger trees limited to the retaining wall area to help screen the walls. He reminded the Commission that this was not a large development. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Nolan felt the applicant did not properly respond to the Commission's request for simulation photos. She asked for an answer regarding the retaining walls. CDD/Fong responded that it was the applicant's decision as to what type of wall they would use. There is a condition requiring landscaping and irrigation. Mr. Singh stated that the system is called a "lock and load" system with a fagade that allows for vegetation cells. The reason this type of system is used is to accommodate the concerns regarding massing and keep the development envelope as small as possible. VC/Torng commended the builder for his time and effort toward a good project. However, he believed that comments were important for the applicant to consider. He felt that in researching all of the previous material that the applicant had not properly responded to the request for viewpoint simulations. He asked the applicant to tell the Commission what size trees he intended to install, give the Commission more information about the retaining wall and respond to the request for gateway view simulations. C/Lee agreed with VC/Torng that the applicant had not fully responded to the Commission's requests for certain information. He asked the applicant for his sincere cooperation based on the Commission's requests. C/Wei echoed other Commissioner's comments regarding trees, preservation of oak trees, increase in the size of replacement trees and how to soften the retaining walls with more vegetation. He suggested that the applicant come back with plans to show the Commission. It seemed to him that the applicant had not complied with the Commission's request to have the pictures from the northbound SR57 without the vegetation at the side of the freeway. Chair/Nelson suggested the applicant speak with restoration ecologist Dr. Quinn at CalPoly to address concerns about what size trees should be installed as replacement of the native trees and replace other trees with larger boxed trees. He wanted a condition added to require that the slopes being graded above residences be planted immediately and that the applicant would use the native planting for erosion control. He believed the project could be made to look like it appears today although it would take a long restoration period. Chair/Nelson said he would like to move the project up the line but he was not convinced the applicant had provided what the Commission asked and he wants the City Council to see it as well. DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 11 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lee said he was not comfortable with the project and wanted the applicant to prove that the proposed project was the best for the residents. C/Nolan wanted to know if C/Lee was asking the applicant to provide a new plan without a retaining wall. C/Lee said he wanted to see different plan options to accommodate other opinions put forth by the residents because he believed that individual views of the plan were completely opposite. C/Nolan said it was not clear to her what C/Lee was requesting. C/Lee said he wanted a different plan that included the resident's comments and concerns. ACA/Kovacevich cautioned the Commission that there might be a fundamental misunderstanding about the process. The idea was not to get to the point of necessarily finding a project that everyone liked but to come to agreement that the project complied with the findings of fact. The applicant has submitted a project that has gone through several iterations and been pared down to 16 homes and, the applicant is seeking an up or down vote on the proposed project. If C/Lee is uncomfortable with the project and feels he cannot make the findings he could recommend denial. However, it is not proper for the Commission to attempt to redesign the project. C/Wei recommended the following: 1) revise the plan to increase the size of trees and vegetation and a include a plan to transplant or preserve the oak trees, 2) find a way to soften the wall and, 3) provide view photos taken from northbound SR57 without the vegetation for photos 2, 3 & 4. Mr. Singh stated that each of the visuals cost the applicant about $1500 each. He wants to cooperate and has presented seven or eight views and asked the Commission to limit their expectations as much as possible. C/Wei believed the vegetation could be added and removed using a computer software program. C/Nolan stated that this request was made at the last meeting and the request was not a new request to the applicant and it would therefore not be unreasonable for the Commission to request compliance. If the applicant had provided one northbound rendering as previously requested this issue might have been resolved this evening. Mr. Singh reiterated that the Commission was requesting views without vegetation (photos 2, 3 & 4) along the northbound SR57 and response to recommendations regarding tree replacement, relocation and vegetation as DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION called out by C/Wei. writing to Mr. Singh. CDD/Fong said that staff would provide the requests in CDD/Fong reiterated the Commission's requests and included Chair/Nelson's concern about planting trees that were too large. Mr. Singh asked the Commission to reconsider their recommendation regarding replanting due to the low success rate of a very costly effort. He stated that he was willing to comply with all of the other requests. VC/Torng moved to continue the Public Hearing to January 9, 2007, to allow the applicant time to comply. Chair/Nelson agreed with Mr. Singh about native trees that 15 gallon and 24 box trees would be appropriate and asked for a friendly amendment to VC/Torng's motion. VC/Torng amended his motion. C/Lee seconded the amended motion. CDD/Fong restated the motion as follows: To continue the item to January 9, 2007, and to bring back the aforementioned items: 1) revised photos #2, 3 and 4; percentage of tree species for softening the look of the retaining walls minus relocation of native species. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Torng; Lee, Nolan, Wei, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: None 9. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Lee cautioned staff to make certain applicants were prepared to respond to Commissioner's request and not waste everyone's time. VC/Torng thanked staff for their responsible efforts. He said it was an honorto work with his colleagues and wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Chair/Nelson concurred. 10. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS. 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future proiects. DECEMBER 12, 2006 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Nelson adjourned the regular meeting at 9:42 p.m. to January 9, 2007. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Nancy Fong, Coir} rdunityVevelopment Director 0� eve Nelson, Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Agenda No. 6-3(a) MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION S.C.A.Q.M.D./THE GOVERNMENT CENTER AUDITORIUM 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Grundy called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the SCAQMD/Government Center Building Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Owens led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Lew Herndon, and Vice Chairman Ted Owens and Chairman Dave Grundy. Absent: Commissioners Benny Liang and Ruth Low were excused. Staff Present: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services; Anthony Jordan, Parks and Maintenance Superintendent; Sara Somogyi West, Recreation Services Manager; Claude Bradley, Parks & Maintenance Supervisor; Margot Suarez, Day Camp Coordinator; Meghan Gorden, Day Camp Coordinator; Alison Meyers, Recreation Specialist; and Marisa Somenzi, Senior Administrative Assistant. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: Day Camp Coordinator Suarez presented Certificates of Completion and Stipends to Summer Volunteen Participants. RECESS: Chair/Grundy recessed the meeting at 7:15 p.m. RECONVENE: Chair/Grundy reconvened the meeting at 7:27 p.m. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None Offered. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As Listed in the Agenda and reported by CSD/Rose. CONSENT CALENDAR VC/Owens moved, Chair/Grundy seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as Presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Owens, Chair/Grundy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Herndon ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Liang, Low SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION 1.1 Approved Minutes for August 24, 2006 — As Presented 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 2.1 Recreation Program Report — RSM/Somogyi West VC/Owens asked how the D.B. Day at the Fair went and RSM/West responded that it went well and staff received positive feedback. VC/Owens asked if all staff members received CPR training and RSM/Somogyi West responded yes. In addition, two staff members are Certified CPR trainers. Chair/Grundy asked about the net gain of revenue to expenditures on the Youth Day Camp Financial Summary. It appeared that absent the grants there would have been a net loss and wanted to know the conditions of the grant funds. CSD/Rose explained that the City has two grants that help support the Summer Day Camp Program. The Department of Education grant pays for the "Peace Builders" portion. The City pays a fee for two years of service. The Prop A funds pay for the bus transportation. He believed the program was very close to break-even. All grant requirements were met and any overage is credited to the City's General Fund. RSM/Somogyi West responded to VC/Owens that there were 10-15 D.B. booths at the Fair. She indicated that last year there were 25-30 artists for the first event, an excellent response. This year there have been a number of calls and staff expects a good showing for the Sunday at the Center. CSD/Rose said staff's goal was to accommodate 27 artists inside the building and that the City could accommodate 50 or so artists by using the outside areas if needed. Chair/Grundy asked about the special City Council hats used during the Concerts in the Park series. RSM/Somogyi West responded that staff received a lot of positive feedback from attendees who said it was much easier to identify Council Members. In addition, attendees felt it made the Council Members seem much more friendly and approachable. Staff plans to continue use of the hats next year. 2.2 Parks Report — PMS/Jordan. C/Herndon thanked staff for conducting the walkthroughs and what staff has done to prepare parks for the upcoming sports season. 2.3 C.I.P. Program Report — CSD/Rose a. Sycamore Canyon Park ADA Retrofit — Phase III — CSD/Rose reported that staff intends to take this to the City Council on Tuesday, October 3 for award of contract. The bids came in significantly higher than what was budgeted. Bids ranged from 1.3 million to 2 million dollars. The bid being submitted to the City Council includes options to reduce the cost as well as taking $600,000 plus from the Parks Development Fund to fund SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 PAGE 3 P&R COMMISSION the full project. CSD/Rose responded to VC/Grundy that according to the designers and contractors the price of construction continues to increase. b. Slope Repair at Diamond Bar Center CSD/Rose reported that at its last meeting City Council awarded the contract for the slope repair at the Diamond Bar Center. Once the contractor has submitted the necessary documentation a pre - construction meeting will be held and once construction commences, the project should be completed in about 30 days. 2.4 Lorbeer Middle School Design of Football Field/Track Slope Improvements CSD/Rose reported that at its August 15 meeting the City Council awarded the design contract for track and football field improvements to David Evans & Associates. CSD/Rose said he would meet with the PUSD officials and the design committee to discuss what needs to be done on the football field. Chair/Grundy requested that staff email him a copy of the joint use agreement. 2.5 Art in Public Places — Results of September 12, 2006 subcommittee meeting. C/Herndon reported that the initial meeting was a fact-finding meeting. Subcommittee members received copies of programs in other cities and were reminded about certain restraints placed on the matter by the City Council. He said he looked forward to following this matter through to a satisfactory conclusion. CSD/Rose stated that staff found that Manhattan Beach has a program similar to what has been discussed for D.B. LA City has a program for the developers as well as a program that does not include developer fees. Today staff received a solicitation from Los Angeles County about how they distribute grants for their art programs. There is a significant amount of money available that may in time be available to a non-profit organization that supports art in the City. For example, the Diamond Bar Community Foundation could be an avenue. However, the non-profit must commit at least 51 percent of their resources to art programs. 2.6 Batting Cages at Peterson and Pantera Parks CSD/Rose reported on the progress of the design plan for the project. The project as proposed came in at about $300,000 for a state -of -the art facility. As a result, staff has asked the architect to go back to the drawing board to reduce costs to stay within the $150,000 budget. The next step is to schedule public meetings in October. SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 PAGE 4 P&R COMMISSION C/Herndon said he felt shade was not required. CSD/Rose responded to C/Herndon that it was staff's intent to construct a curb around the decomposed granite to keep it in place. CSD/Rose further responded that the locations would be serviced by the existing ball field lights. 3. OLD BUSINESS: NONE 4. NEW BUSINESS: NONE 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Herndon said that in his opinion with respect to Concerts in the Park hats for Commissioners were not necessary. He thanked staff for their hard work. VC/Owens also said hats were not necessary for the Commissioners. He thanked staff for their support of the baseball picnic. With respect to batting cages, he felt it was important to make sure the lighting offered a safe environment. Chair/Grundy commented on the opening of Target and CSD/Rose spoke briefly about the soft grand opening ceremonies. Chair/Grundy said that Lorbeer looked "incredibly improved." He said he was very grateful that a joint use agreement was finally reached and thanked those involved. C/Herndon apologized for missing the last meeting and said he would also miss the October meeting. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Parks & Recreation Commission, Chair/Grundy adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Bob Rose, Secretary Attest: Dave Grundy, Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Agenda No. 6.3(b) MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION S.C.A.Q.M.D./HEARING BOARD ROOM 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 NOVEMBER 16, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Grundy called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the SCAQMD/Government Center Building Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Owens led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Lew Herndon, Benny Liang, Ruth Low, Vice Chairman Ted Owens and Chairman Dave Grundy. Staff Present: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services; Anthony Jordan, Parks and Maintenance Superintendent; Claude Bradley, Parks and Maintenance Supervisor and Marisa Somenzi, Senior Administrative Assistant. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None Offered. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As Listed in the Agenda and reported by CSD/Rose. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.1 Approval of Minutes for the September 28, 2006 Regular Meeting. C/Herndon moved, VC/Owens seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 2.1 Recreation Program Report - CSD/Rose Herndon, VC/Owens, Chair/Grundy None Liang, Low None C/Low asked where the seats were located for the musical. CSD/Rose responded that he would find out and let the Commissioners know. C/Low asked if the City had considered adult programming such as parenting classes. CSD/Rose responded that there are more than 100 contract NOVEMBER 16, 2006 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION classes available to adults and that he would check to see if it included parenting classes. 2.2 Parks Report — PMS/Jordan. 2.3 Community Foundation — CSD/Rose 2.4 Trails Master Plan — CSD/Rose Subcommittee members C/Low and C/Herndon agreed to begin meeting in January. Staff will contact the subcommittee members to schedule a date and time after the first of the year. 2.5 Discussion about whether to hold a December 28, 2006 meeting. The Commission concurred to go dark on December 28, 2006 and adjourn tonight's meeting to January 25, 2007 meeting date. 2.6 C.I.P. Program Report — CSD/Rose a. Sycamore Canyon Park ADA Retrofit — Phase III — scheduled for completion the first week of June 2007. Chair/Grundy asked if work could possibly affect the 2007 Concerts in the Park series. CSD/Rose responded that this project includes work on the stage area and at worst the stage would be placed on the other side of the sidewalk. The restrooms will remain open during construction. Location of food booths may be an issue. However, the concerts have been pushed back to the first week after the 4th of July celebration. b. Slope Repair at Diamond Bar Center — CSD/Rose The 30 -day project is on schedule to be completed by the first week of December. C. Batting Cages at Peterson and Pantera Parks — CSD/Rose Staff held two public meetings. Peterson Park is on track. There were some issues regarding the location of the batting cages in Pantera Park and staff understands it may be receiving a petition from concerned residents. CSD/Rose responded to C/Herndon that the Pantera Park neighborhood is a quiet area and there may be concern about the location and the noise generation. Staff planned to set up a simulation to determine the actual noise generation but has postponed the setup until after Tuesday night's City Council meeting to see if a petition is brought forth. There is no concern about noise generation at Peterson Park due to the proximity to the freeway. NOVEMBER 16, 2006 PAGE 3 P&R COMMISSION There was no opposition to the Peterson Park location. VC/Owens asked about viewing the batting cage designs. He said there was also some concern about the location of the cages. Because of the proposed location near the entrance of the park the design and appearance would make an impact on the park and he would like to see what the design looks like. CSD/Rose said he would schedule the matter for discussion during the January meeting. Chair/Grundy expressed that he was very much in favor of batting cages at both parks and hoped it could be worked out to the satisfaction of all involved. Chair/Grundy left the meeting at 7:42 p.m. 3. OLD BUSINESS: None 4. NEW BUSINESS: 4.1 Proposed Fee Increase for Rentals at the Diamond Bar Center. CSD/Rose stated that the purpose of the proposed rental fee increase is to attempt to keep the operational costs in line. Currently, the budget item is $885,000 for expenditures and revenue of $500,000. The last time the fees were increased was in 2005. The majority of the primetime use of the Diamond Bar Center is booked ahead 18 months and therefore, the City would not realize increased revenue until after 18 months from approval of the increase. He explained the proposed increases. Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend City Council approval of a Diamond Bar Center fee increase. C/Herndon felt the proposed increases were reasonable. C/Low asked how close to break even the City would be with implementation of the fee increases. CSD/Rose responded that on average the increases would result in an increased income of 30% or about $650,000. Management does not expect to fully recoup the expenses because there is no charge for senior groups. The $885,000 figure includes staff that work events at the center. Salaries for staff members who are housed at the center are not included. C/Low said that in her opinion, the proposed increases were reasonable. She said she was concerned about a 31 percent increase for residents and a 27 percent increase for non-residents and businesses and wondered if residents would complain about being charged more than non-residents on a proportionate basis. CSD/Rose said it could be a concern and he would not have a problem raising the percentages for non-residents and businesses proportionate to the increase for residents. C/Herndon said it was reasonable to him. VC/Owens felt that residents should have a break. NOVEMBER 16, 2006 PAGE 4 P&R COMMISSION CSD/Rose responded to VC/Owens that the fees were based on market rates. The fees would go into effect 30 days from date of City Council approval. However, the City would not realize additional revenues for about 18 months since the facility is booked that far in advance. C/Liang felt the rental fees for the Diamond Bar Center were very reasonable. He believed that the only facility that was comparable to the Diamond Bar Center was the Pacific Palms. C/Herndon wondered if the expenses could also increase by 10-12 percent in the next 18 months and eat into the increases. Perhaps staff should consider another increase in 12 months. CSD/Rose said he anticipated staff would come back to the Commission on a regular 12 -month basis. The commitment to the seniors is to have the Pine Room available seven days a week on a no -charge basis. The rest of the facility is on a first available basis for senior activities Monday through Friday from time of opening until about 4:00 p.m. (3:00 p.m. on Friday). Primetime from Friday evening through Sunday are the hours available for rental. C/Herndon moved, C/Liang seconded, to recommend City Council approval of a 31 percent across the board fee increase for the Diamond Bar Center and to seek guidance from Council about future increases to close the gap between income and expenditures. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Herndon, Liang, Low, VC/Owens NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Grundy 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Herndon commended staff on their good work. C/Low concurred with C/Herndon that there is a lot happening in the City and CSD/Rose and his staff work very hard to make it happen. C/Liang said he felt the same about staff and wished everyone Happy Holidays. VC/Owens agreed that staff does a good job, especially in the area of providing services and maintaining the City's facilities. NOVEMBER 16, 2006 PAGE 5 P&R COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: On motion by C/Low, seconded by C/Herndon and with no further business before the Parks & Recreation Commission, VC/Owens adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m. to January 25, 2007. Respectfully Submitted, Bob Rose, Secretary Attest: Ted Owens, Vice- Chairman CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda # 6 . d Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 AGENDA REPORT FROM: James DeStefano, City M r TITLE: Ratification of Check Register da d January 11, 2007 through January 31, 2007 totaling $1,433,565.06. RECOMMENDATION: Ratify. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $1,433,565.06 in City funds. BACKGROUND: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting. DISCUSSION: The attached check register containing checks dated January 11, 2007 through January 31, 2007 for $1,433,565.06 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Fi nankeoDirector Assistant City Manager Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register -01/11/07 through 01/31/07. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT The attached listings of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register including checks dated January 11, 2007 through January 31, 2007 has been audited and is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these amounts: Fund # Description Amount 001 General Fund $1,153,851.67 011 Community Organization Support Fd 100.00 112 Prop A - Transit Fund 11,269.05 115 Int. Waste Mgt Fund 13,614.82 118 AB2766 - AQMD Fund 3,300.15 125 CDBG Fund 12,538.88 126 Citizens Option for Public Safety Fd 140.00 128 CA Law Enforcement Equip Fd 1,132.28 138 LLAD #38 Fund 20,283.05 139 LLAD #39 Fund 17,513.11 141 LLAD #41 Fund 10,029.01 250 Capital Improvement Project Fund 182,401.04 510 Self Insurance Fund 7,392.00 $1,433,565.06 Signed: 4�)b Linda G. Mag'nLAon Finance Director City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 07 -PP 01 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 01 139 10200 1,218.43 $134,048.14 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 01 141 10200 1,218.38 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 01 118 10200 1,348.24 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 01 125 10200 1,475.40 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 01 138 10200 1,218.35 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 01 001 10200 115,488.48 1/11/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 01 112 10200 5,278.30 1/11/2007 1 1PAYROLLTRANSFER I P/R TRANSFER-071PP 01 1 115 1 10200 1 6,802.56 1/25/2007 07 -PP 02 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 02 139 10200 938.66 $136,387.65 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-07/PP 02 141 10200 938.68 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFE R P/R TRANSFER-071PP 02 118 10200 1,101.91 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 02 125 10200 1,111.94 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 02 138 10200 938.65 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 02 001 10200 122,411.21 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER 112 10200 3,906.75 1/25/2007 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-071PP 02 115 10200 5,039.85 1/11/2007 1 73897 JACT GIS INC IGIS SVCS -OCT 06 1 0014070 1 44000 1 5,000.001 $5,000.00 1/11/2007 73898 AMERICOMP GROUP INC SUPPLIES -TONER 0014070 45000 238.15 $1,728.15 1/11/2007 1AMERICOMP GROUP INC PRINTER MAINT-OCT-DEC O6 0014070 1 45000 1,490.00 1/11/2007 1 73899 IPHIL ANTHONY ENTERTAINMENT -SR DANCE 1 0015350 1 45300 1 350.001 $350.00 1/11/2007 73900 SOLEDAD ARMENTA PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 001 36810 -75.00 $391.00 1/11/2007 SOLEDAD ARMENTA PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 001 36615 -34.00 1/11/2007 SOLEDAD ARMENTA FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 500.00 1/11/2007 73901 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 23010 135.00 $1,575.00 1/11/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 34430 -135.00 1/11/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP SLOPE REPAIR -DBC 2505310 46415 825.00 1/11/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP PROF.SVCS-FPL 2005-147 001 23010 750.00 1/11/2007 1 73902 IBEAR STATE AIR CONDITIONING SVCS IN IMAINT SVCS -DBC 1 0015333 1 42210 1 2,034.911 $2,034.91 Page 1 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73903 IBENESYST 1/12/07-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 1 21105 1 381.911 $381.91 1/11/2007 1 73904 IRANJANA BHATT FACILITY REFUND -DBC 1 001 1 23002 1 450.001 $450.00 1/11/2007 BRAHMA FOUNDATION IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 36615 -260.00 1/11/2007 1 73905 IBOULEVARD BAGELS INC JMTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 1 0014090 1 42325 1 54.891 $54.89 1/11/2007 73906 BRAHMA FOUNDATION FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 700.00 $440.00 1/11/2007 BRAHMA FOUNDATION IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 36615 -260.00 1/11/2007 1 73907 IBUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYS INC. PH.SVCS-DEC 06 1 0014070 1 42125 1 232.001 $232.00 1/11/2007 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS-P/INFO 0014095 1 42110 735.02 1/11/2007 1 73908 IBUSS SHELGER ASSOCIATES ICONSULTING SVCS -HILLSIDE 1 0015240 1 44000 1 3,750.001 $3,750.00 1/11/2007 1 73909 IMARIA CARDOZA IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34740 1 64.001 $64.00 1/11/2007 1 73910 JCDW GOVERNMENT INC. SUPPLIES-I.T. 1 0014070 1 41200 1 85.52 $85.52 1/11/2007 1 73911 ICHUCK H LOFTIN ENTERTAINMENT -SR DANCE 1 0015350 1 45300 1 350.001 $350.00 1/11/2007 1 73912 IVICTORIA CROSS CONTRACT SVCS-H/R 1 0014060 44000 1 3,400.001 $3,400.00 1/11/2007 1 73913 ILINDA CZARKOWSKI IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 1 001 36615 1 400.00 $400.00 1/11/2007 73914 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS-CAFR COVER 0014095 42110 151.55 $886.57 1/11/2007 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS-P/INFO 0014095 1 42110 735.02 1/11/2007 1 73915 IDELTA CARE PMI JAN 07 -DENTAL PREMIUMS 1 001 1 21104 1 403.621 $403.62 1/11/2007 1 73916 IDENNIS CAROL PROF.SVCS-SS/CC MTG 1 0014030 1 44000 1 550.001 $550.00 1/11/2007 1 73917 IKEN DESFORGES REIMB-TUITION 1 0014060 1 42341 1 878.431 $878.43 1/11/2007 1 73918 IDIAMOND BAR FINE ART FRAMING SUPPLIES -COUNCIL 1 0014010 1 41200 1 32.48 $32.48 1/11/2007 1 73919 IDIAMOND BAR HILLS CLUB FACILITY RENTAL -FALL 1 0015350 1 42140 1 1,080.001 $1,080.00 1/11/2007 1 73920 IDIAMOND BAR/WALNUT YMCA CDBG PROG-DAY CAMP 1 1255215 1 42355 1 2,228.001 $2,228.00 Page 2 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73921 EDUCATION TO GO CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 1 208.00 $208.00 1/11/2007 1 73922 PRISCILLA ESPINOSA IRECREATION REFUND 001 1 34780 1 50.00 $50.00 1/11/2007 1 IGOVIS LLC CONTRACT SVCS-TRCKNG SFTW 0014070 1 44000 1,275.00 1/11/2007 1 73923 1EXPRESS TEL LONG DIST SVCS -GENERAL 0014090 1 42125 1 58.81 $58.81 1/11/2007 1 73924 FOOTHILL BUILDING MATERIALS INC SUPPLIES-EOC 0014440 1 41200 1 135.101 $135.10 1/11/2007 1 73925 IFRANCHISE TAX BOARD SLRY ATTCHMT-PP 01/07 001 1 21114 1 390.40 $390.40 1/11/2007 1 73926 IROMMEL P GARCIA IFACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 1 23002 1 200.00 $200.00 1/11/2007 1 73927 IGO LIVE TECHNOLOGY INC 1CONSULTING SVCS-I.T 0014070 44000 3,375.001 $3,375.00 1/11/2007 1 73928 IMEDDY GORGANI REFUND -TEMP SIGN 001 34430 100.00 $100.00 1/11/2007 73929 GOVIS LLC CONTRACT SVCS-TRCKNG SFTW 0014070 44000 1,211.25 $2,486.25 1/11/2007 1 IGOVIS LLC CONTRACT SVCS-TRCKNG SFTW 0014070 1 44000 1,275.00 1/11/2007 1 73930 JGOVPARTNER IREQUEST PARTNER -JAN 07 1185098 1 44030 1 850.00 $850.00 1/11/2007 1 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 23010 44.50 1/11/2007 1 73931 ISUSAN HAGER FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 23002 1 350,001 $350.00 1/11/2007 73932 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL 2005-147 001 23010 225.00 $225.00 1/11/2007 1 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 23010 44.50 1/11/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 34430 -44.50 1/11/2007 1 73933 ICHARLIE HENTGES RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 95.00 $95.00 1/11/2007 73934 HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES INC. ADA IMP PROJ-SYC CYN 2505310 R46415 2,850.00 $9,595.89 1/11/2007 1 HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES INC. ADA IMP PROJ-SYC CYN 2505310 R46415 375.89 1/11/2007 HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES INC. ADA IMP PROJ-SYC CYN 2505310 R46415 6,370.00 1/11/2007 73935 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 88.29 $129.18 1/11/2007 1 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 42210 40.89 1/11/2007 1 73936 IHOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC SUPPLIES -RECREATION 1 0015350 1 41200 1 3,402.471 $3,402.47 Page 3 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73937 EMPIRE STAGES EXCURSION -DISNEY C/HALL 1125350 1 45310 724.00 $1,724.00 1/11/2007 1 JINLAND INLAND EMPIRE STAGES EXCURSION -ROSE PARADE 1125350 45310 1 1,000.00 1/11/2007 73938 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD -FPL 2005-147 001 23010 344.40 $499.20 1/11/2007 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD-CDBG 1255215 44000 154.80 1/11/2007 1 73939 IKENS HARDWARE SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT 1 0015554 1 41250 1 107.311 $107.31 1/11/2007 73940 KEVIN HI KIM PROF.SVCS-EN 06-540 001 34650 500.00 $245.00 1/11/2007 1 KEVIN HI KIM ADMIN FEE -EN 06-540 001 34650 1 -255.00 1/11/2007 1 73941 IMICHAEL KIM IFACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 1 001 23002 200.00 $200.00 1/11/2007 1 KWANG HO LEE PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 001 36810 -150.00 1/11/2007 1 73942 JKLEINFELDER INC BEAUTIFICATION -GRAND AVE 2505510 46411 757.50 $757.50 1/11/2007 73943 ISUNNIE KONG IRECREATION REFUND 001 34780 64.00 $64.00 1/11/2007 1 73944 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS SUPPLIES-P/INFO 0014095 41400 1 41.43 $41.43 1/11/2007 1 73945 JLDM ASSOCIATES INC. HIP PROG-CDBG NOV 06 1255215 1 44000 1 2,865.00 $2,865.00 1/11/2007 73946 KWANG HO LEE FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 23002 800.001 $582.00 1/11/2007 1 KWANG HO LEE PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 001 36810 -150.00 1/11/2007 73950 KWANG HO LEE PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 001 36615 -68.00 $700.00 1/11/2007 1 73947 IPEGGY LEE RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 81.00 $81.00 1/11/2007 739411 CASSIDY WHITMORE H/R CONF-CROSS 0014060 42330 445.001/11/2007 $924.19 1 JL:EBERT LEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE H/R CONF-DOYLE 0014030 42330 445.00 1/11/2007 1 73949 ILOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS SUMP PUMP MAINT-SEPT 06 0015340 1 42210 1 924.19 $924.19 1/11/2007 1 73950 TANZILA MATIN IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 23002 1 700.00 $700.00 1/11/2007 1 73951 TIM MCCANN IFACILITY RENTAL -DBC 001 1 23002 1 350.001 $350.00 Page 4 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number 1 Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73952 MCE CORPORATION ROAD MAI NT-NOV 06 0015554 45502 1 10,764.74 $10,764.74 1/11/2007 73953 LAUREL MEYER REIMS -SUPPLIES 0015350 41200 22.73 $45.77 1/11/2007 LAUREL MEYER IREIMB-SUPPLIES 00153501 41200 1 23.04 1/11/2007 1 73954 IPHIL MORTON IFACILITY RENTAL -DBC 1 001 1 23002 1 100.001 $100.00 1/11/2007 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/24 0015210 44000 317.76 1/11/2007 1 73955 IMUNICIPAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION ICOMP TRNG-CITY VIEW 1 0014070 1 46235 1 40,272.001 $40,272.00 1/11/2007 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/31 0015310 44000 476.64 1/11/2007 1 73956 ICHRISTY MURPHEY REIMB-SUPPLIES 1 0015350 1 41200 1 130.71 $130.71 1/11/2007 1 73957 IJAIME NAJERA IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 1 001 1 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 1/11/2007 1 73958 INATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP TRNG-L SMITH 1 0015210 1 42340 1 399.00 $399.00 1/11/2007 1 73959 INORRIS REPKE INC JENG STAFF SVCS-NOV 06 1 0015510 1 45221 1 7,665.001 $7,665.00 1/11/2007 73960 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/17 0015210 44000 158.88 $1,747.68 1/11/2007 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/24 0015210 44000 317.76 1/11/2007 73962 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/24 0015310 44000 317.76 $840.43 1/11/2007 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/31 0015310 44000 476.64 1/11/2007 73963 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 12/10 0015210 44000 476.64 $650.00 1/11/2007 1 73961 IP & D CONSULTANTS INC CRESTLINE-ANNEXATION 1 0015210 1 R44220 1 14,054.201 $14,054.20 1/11/2007 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 8,581.04 1/11/2007 1 73962 1PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC. ILONG DIST SVCS -GENERAL 10014090 1 42125 1 840.43 $840.43 1/11/2007 1 73963 IDILIP PATEL IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 1 001 1 23002 1 650.00 $650.00 1/11/2007 1 73964 IPERS RETIREMENT FUND O6/07-ADDL SURVIVOR BNFIT 1 001 1 21109 1 1,382.401 $1,382.40 1/11/2007 73965 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-ER 001 21109 13,546.98 $22,174.52 1/11/2007 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 8,581.04 1/11/2007 PERS RETIREMENT FUND SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 21109 46.50 1/11/2007 1 73966 IJULIA PETERS IFACILITY REFUND -DBC 1 001 1 36615 1 152.00 $152.00 Page 5 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 1/11/2007 73967 PLAZA DIAMOND BAR PARTNERS LLC PLAZA DIAMOND BAR PARTNERS LLC REFUND -EN 06-545 ADMIN FEE -EN 06-545 001 001 34650 34650 500.00 340.00 $160.00 1/11/2007 1 73968 IR & D BLUEPRINT IPRINT SVCS -EN 01-323 001 1 23012 1 160.291 $160.29 1/11/2007 1ASHOK REPUBLIC ELECTRIC ADDL TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 8,552.86 1/11/2007 1 73969 IR F DICKSON COMPANY ISTREET SWEEPING SVCS -DEC 0015554 1 45501 1 9,323.441 $9,323.44 1/11/2007 73970 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC ADDL TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 5,934.05 $20,046.23 1/11/2007 1ASHOK REPUBLIC ELECTRIC ADDL TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 8,552.86 1/11/2007 73976 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC ADDL TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 600.00 $70.00 1/11/2007 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 3,284.32 1/11/2007 73977 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC ADDL TRFFC MAINT-NOV 06 0015554 45507 1,675.001 1 1/11/2007 73971 RHF INC. LASER RECERT-SHERIFF 1264411 1 42200 70.00 $140.00 1/11/2007 1ASHOK 1RHF INC. LASER RECERT-SHERIFF 1264411 1 42200 70.00 1/11/2007 73972 ASHOK ROY FACILITY RENTAL -DBC 001 23002 350.00 $275.00 1/11/2007 1ASHOK ROY PROPERTY DAMAGE -DBC 0015333 41200 1 -75.00 1/11/2007 1 73973 ITAREN SALAZAR RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 65.00 $65.00 1/11/2007 73974 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION PROF.SVCS-FPL 2005-147 001 23010 1,040.00 $1,040.00 1/11/2007 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 23010 187.20 1/11/2007 73976 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 001 34430 -187.20 $70.00 1/11/2007 1 73975 ISCAN ALERT INC ICOMP MAINT-I.T. 1 0014070 1 45000 1 2,000.00 $2,000.00 1/11/2007 1 73976 ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC LABOR H/R CONF-DOYLE/CROSS 0014060 1 42325 1 70.001 $70.00 1/11/2007 73977 JSCPMA HR IMEMBERSHIP DUES -CROSS 0014060 1 42315 1 40.001 $40.00 1/11/2007 1 73978 ISECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY EXAM FEE-CRIBBINS 0014030 1 42340 1 40.00 $40.00 1/11/2007 1 73979 ISHRED IT LOS ANGELES PROF.SVCS-DESTRCTN RECORD 0014030 1 44000 1 405.001 $405.00 1/11/2007 1 73980 ISIGN CONTRACTORS INC DEP-ARMED FORCES BANNER 0015350 1 45300 1 4,095.591 $4,095.59 Page 6 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73981 ISMART & FINAL SUPPLIES -SR BINGO 0015350 41200 114.951 $114.95 1/11/2007 73982 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 0015510 42126 93.82 $6,303.01 1/11/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 0015510 42126 71.31 $16.95 1/11/2007 73984 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 0015510 42126 126.33 $100.00 1/11/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 0015510 42126 159.85 1/11/2007 1 1/11/2007 73985 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 0015510 42126 232.22 $524.89 1/11/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 41 1415541 42126 137.25 1/11/2007 73986 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 4,888.91 $1,125.00 1/11/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 25.62 1/11/2007 73987 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 300.87 $168.74 1/11/2007 ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON JELECT SVCS -DIST 39 1395539 1 42126 1 266.83 1/11/2007 1 73983 JDALE STAIR REFUND -EN 06-551 1 001 1 23012 1 750.00 $750.00 1/11/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-DIST 41 1415541 45500 3,518.20 $16.95 1/11/2007 1 73984 ISTATE DUSBURSEMENT UNIT I SLRY ATTCHCMT-BY0426064 1 001 1 21114 1 100.00 $100.00 1/11/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-DIST 38 1385538 45500 5,754.57 1/11/2007 1 1/11/2007 1 73985 ITELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS T1 INTERNET SVCS -JAN 07 1 0014070 1 44030 1 524.89 $524.89 1/11/2007 1 73986 ITHE COMDYN GROUP INC ICONSULTING SVCS-I.T. 1 0014070 1 44000 1 1,125.00 $1,125.00 1/11/2007 1 73987 ITHE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGAL AD-CDBG 1 1255215 1 44000 1 168.74 $168.74 1/11/2007 1 73988 ITHOMSON WEST PUBLICATIONS -2007 CODE 1 0014030 1 42320 1 1,149.641 $1,149.64 1/11/2007 1 73989 ITIME WARNER MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL 0014010 1 42130 1 44.951 $44.95 1/11/2007 73990 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-DIST 39 1395539 45500 11,125.79 $28,311.85 1/11/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-DIST 41 1415541 45500 3,518.20 $16.95 1/11/2007 73992 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-PARKS NOV 0015340 45300 7,913.29 1/11/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE CITY-WIDE MAINT-DIST 38 1385538 45500 5,754.57 1/11/2007 1 1/11/2007 1 73991 IEVELYN TUNG IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34760 1 345.001 $345.00 $16.95 1/11/2007 1 73992 JUNITED PARCEL SERVICE POSTAGE-P/INFO 1 0014095 1 41400 1 16.951 $1,100.00 1/11/2007 1 73993 IVANGUARD VAULTS LA INC JDATA STORAGE SVCS -DEC 06 1 0014070 1 45000 1 550.001 Page 7 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/11/2007 73993... VANGUARD VAULTS LA INC DATA STORAGE SVCS -JAN 07 0014070 45000 550.1 $1,100.00 ... 1/11/2007 73994 IVANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGNTS-303248 01/12/07-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 26,977.221 $26,977.22 1/11/2007 73995 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE 0015340 42125 89.60 $777.10 1/11/2007 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-DBC 0015333 42125 217.49 1/11/2007 74002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE 0015340 42125 43.21 $26.50 1/11/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-MAPLE HILL 0015340 42125 89.60 1/11/2007 74003 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-PANTERA 0015340 42125 89.60 $30.00 1/11/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-REAGAN 0015340 42125 89.60 1/11/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-DBC 0015333 42125 68.15 1/11/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-DBC 1 0015333 1 42125 1 89.85 1/11/2007 1 73996 IVISION INTERNET PROVIDERS INC WEB HOSTING SVCS -DEC 06 1 0014070 1 44030 1 150.00 $150.00 1/11/2007 73997 VISION SERVICE PLAN JAN 07 -VISION PREMIUMS 001 21107 1,289.30 $1,362.30 1/11/2007 1 VISION SERVICE PLAN JAN 07 -COBRA VISION 001 21107 46.77 1/11/2007 74002 VISION SERVICE PLAN JAN 07 -VISION PREMIUMS 0015510 40090 26.23 $26.50 1/11/2007 1 73998 IWEST COACH CORPORATION SUPPLIES -GENERAL 1 0014090 1 41200 1 43.301 $43.30 1/11/2007 73999 AN WU REFUND -EN 06-548 001 34650 500.00 $160.00 1/11/2007 1 IWEI WEI AN WU ]ADMIN FEE -EN 06-548 001 34650 340.00 1/11/2007 74000 XAVIERS FLORIST FLORAL ARRGMNT-REORG 0014010 41200 130.98 $278.20 1/11/2007 XAVIERS FLORIST FLORAL ARRGMNT-CMGR 0014090 41400 73.61 1/11/2007 74002 XAVIERS FLORIST FLORAL ARRGMNT-A MEYERS 0014090 41400 73.61 $26.50 1/11/2007 74001 IRICHARD YEE REIMB-TRFFC CONF 12/6 1 0015510 1 42330 1 51.50 $51.50 1/18/2007 JARAMARK ARAMARK WORK APPAREL & UNIFORM SVCS UNIFORM SVCS -WK 01/04/07 0015310 42130 26.75 1/11/2007 74002 IYOSEMITE WATER EQ RENTAL-DEC/JAN 0015310 42130 1 26.50 $26.50 1/16/2007 74003 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CITY MGR ASSC MTG-CMGR 1/17 0014030 42325 1 30.00 $30.00 1/18/2007 74004 WORK APPAREL & UNIFORM SVCS UNIFORM SVCS -WK 12/21/06 0015310 1 42130 26.75 $80.25 1/18/2007 JARAMARK ARAMARK WORK APPAREL & UNIFORM SVCS UNIFORM SVCS -WK 01/04/07 0015310 42130 26.75 Page 8 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number 1 Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 74004... ARAMARK WORK APPAREL & UNIFORM SVCS UNIFORM SVCS -WK 01/11/07 0015310 42130 1 26.75 $80.25 ... 1/18/2007 74005 AT & T PH SVCS -GENERAL 0014090 42125 23.54 $47.08 1/18/2007 1AT & T PH SVCS -GENERAL 0014090 1 42125 1 23.54 1/18/2007 74006 BEAR STATE AIR CONDITIONING SVCS IN MAINT SVCS-PANTERA 0015340 42210 85.00 $1,013.00 1/18/2007 BEAR STATE AIR CONDITIONING SVCS IN MAINT SVCS -DBC 0015333 45300 773.00 1/18/2007 74008 BEAR STATE AIR CONDITIONING SVCS IN MAINT SVCS -HERITAGE 0015340 42210 155.00 $60.00 1/18/2007 1 74007 IBEE REMOVERS IBEE REMOVAL -SILVER SPRAY 0015558 1 45508 1 125.00 $125.00 1/18/2007 CATALINA BALLAST BULB COMPANY SUPPLIES -HERITAGE 0015340 42210 84.20 1/18/2007 1 74008 ICA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY JCPRS MTG-01/17/07 0015350 1 42325 1 60.001 $60.00 1/1812007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -POOL VEH 12/06 0014090 42200 73.92 1/18/2007 1 74009 ICALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOC. ICCCA MTG-12/06/06 0014030 1 42325 1 22.001 $22.00 1/18/2007 1 74010 ISOFIA CANO IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 37.00 $37.00 1/18/2007 74011 CATALINA BALLAST BULB COMPANY SUPPLIES-MAPLE/HERITAGE 0015340 42210 212.21 $507.03 1/18/2007 CATALINA BALLAST BULB COMPANY SUPPLIES -HERITAGE 0015340 42210 84.20 1/18/2007 74015 CATALINA BALLAST BULB COMPANY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 210.62 $963.88 1/18/2007 1 74012 ISEONG CHO IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 20.001 $20.00 1/18/2007 74013 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS -YOUTH SOCCER 0015350 42110 406.46 $481.15 1/18/2007 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS -DEC NEWSLETTER 0015350 42110 34.64 1/18/2007 74015 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS -JAN NEWSLETTER 0015350 42110 40.05 $963.88 1/18/2007 1 74014 IDEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION ISMIP FEES -OCT -DEC 06 1 001 1 34350 1 491.34 $491.34 1/18/2007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -ROAD MAINT 11/06 0015554 42200 30.00 1/18/2007 1 74015 IDEPT OF TRANSPORTATION ITRAFFIC MAINT-10/06 0015554 1 45507 1 963.88 $963.88 1/1812007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -POOL VEH 12/06 0014090 42200 73.92 1/18/2007 74016 JDFS FLOORING CORP ICARPET MAINT-PANTERA 0015340 1 42210 1 385.00 $385.00 1/18/2007 74017 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -ROAD MAINT 12/06 0015554 42200 60.00 $382.72 1/18/2007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -ROAD MAINT 11/06 0015554 42200 30.00 1/18/2007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH-NGHRHD IMP 12/06 0015230 42200 20.98 1/1812007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -POOL VEH 12/06 0014090 42200 73.92 Page 9 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 74017... DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH-NGHRHD IMP 11/06 0015230 42200 17.98 $382.72 ... 1/18/2007 74024 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -POOL VEH 11106 0014090 42200 116.87 $43.78 1/18/2007 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH ICAR WASH -CS VEH 11/06 1 0015310 42200 62.97 1/18/2007 74018 DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONAL DELI MTG SUPPLIES -12/19/06 0014090 42325 189.00 $470.00 1/18/2007 JDMS DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONAL DELI MTG SUPPLIES-EIR 01/10/07 0014090 42325 121.00 1/18/2007 74024 DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONAL DELI MTG SUPPLIES -12/19/06 0014090 42325 160.00 $43.78 1/1812007 1 74019 IDIEHL EVANS AND COMPANY LLP PROF SVCS -AUDITING 1 0014050 1 44010 1 3,000.00 $3,000.00 1/18/2007 74020 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS INCrc ONSTRUCTION-GRAND 2505510 46411 19,210.00 $36,744.00 1/1812007 JDMS DMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS INC ONSTRUCTION-GRAND 2505510 46411 17,534.00 1/18/2007 74021 EVERGREEN INTERIORS PLANTS-ClHALL 12/06 0014090 42210 215.00 $315.00 1/18!2007 1 EVERGREEN INTERIORS PLANTS -LIBRARY 12/06 0014090 1 42210 100.00 1/18/2007 74022 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST#38 1385538 42210 161.77 $3,833.51 1/18/2007 1 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LADNSCAPE MAINT-DIST#38 1385538 45500 3,216.34 1 1/18/2007 74024 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DISCT#41 1415541 45500 455.40 $43.78 1/18/2007 1 74023 IFEDERALEXPRESS 1EXPRESS MAIL -GEN 1 0014090 1 42120 1 85.431 $85.43 1/18/2007 1 GRAND MOBIL VEH MAINT-NBRHD IMP 0015230 42200 128.20 1/18/2007 1 74024 IFOOD FROM THE HEARTH CATERING FOOD -SR HOLIDAY DANCE 1 0015350 1 45300 1 2,821.501$2,821.50 $43.78 1/18/2007 1 74025 IFOOTHILL BUILDING MATERIALS INC SUPPLIES-EMER PREP 1 0014440 1 41200 1 178.291 $178.29 1/18/2007 1 74026 IGRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS IGRAFFITI REMOVAL SVC -DEC 0015230 1 45520 1 6,990.001$6,990.00 1/18/2007 74027 GRAND MOBIL VEH MAINT-CS 0015310 1 42200 161.36 $289.56 1/18/2007 1 GRAND MOBIL VEH MAINT-NBRHD IMP 0015230 42200 128.20 1/18/2007 1 74028 IGLENNA HEUSTIS IRECREATION REFUND 001 1 34780 1 81.001 $81.00 1/18/2007 MEI MEI HUFF 1ADDNL RENTAL FEES 001 36615 -225.00 1/18/2007 1 74029 IHOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0015350 1 41200 1 43.781 $43.78 1/18/2007 74030 MEI MEI HUFF PK REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 500.00 $275.00 1 1 1/18/2007 MEI MEI HUFF 1ADDNL RENTAL FEES 001 36615 -225.00 Page 10 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 1/18/2007 74036 DEV CENTER/COMM INDUSTRIEPKWY MAINT - NOVEMBER 0015558 45503 1,906.36 $3,812.72 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 1 74031 JINLAND ROUNDBALL OFFICIALS 1OFFICIAL SVCS -01/14/07 0015350 1 45300 1 440.001 $440.00 1/18/2007 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB/MTN LAUREL 2505510 R46412 7,575.84 1/18/2007 1 74032 JINLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN PUBLICATIONS -RENEWAL 0014090 1 42320 1 184.801 $184.80 1/18/2007 1 74033 IJOE A. GONSALVES & SON INC. ILEGISLATIVE SVCS -01/07 0014030 1 44000 1 3,000.00 $3,000.00 1/18/2007 1 74034 IJUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION PARKING CITE ADMIN -12/06 0014411 1 45405 1 742.32 $742.32 1/18/2007 1 74035 JKLEINFELDER INC IPROF SVCS - GRAND AVE BB 2505510 1 46411 1 8,211.50 $8,211.50 1/18/2007 74036 DEV CENTER/COMM INDUSTRIEPKWY MAINT - NOVEMBER 0015558 45503 1,906.36 $3,812.72 1/18/2007 ILANTERMAN LANTERMAN DEV CENTER/COMM INDUSTRIE PKWY MAINT - DECEMBER 0015558 1 45503 1,906.36 1/18/2007 1 74037 IJACKIE LE IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 20.00 $20.00 1/18/2007 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB @ GRAND 2505510 R46412 80,238.59 1/18/2007 1 74038 ISHEREELEE RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 20.00 $20.00 1/18/2007 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB/MTN LAUREL 2505510 R46412 7,575.84 1/18/2007 74039 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT IMAINT - SUPPLIES 10015340 1 42210 1 266.111 $266.11 1/18/2007 74040 JLR LOCKSMITHING PROF SVCS- FINANCE 1 0014050 1 44000 1 85.291 $85.29 1/18/2007 74041 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB/SHDW CYN 2505510 R46412 544.18 $96,192.82 1/18/2007 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB @ GRAND 2505510 R46412 80,238.59 1/18/2007 74043 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION RETENTION PAYABLE-SIGNLS 250 20300 -10,688.09 $8.00 1/18/2007 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-DBB/MTN LAUREL 2505510 R46412 7,575.84 1/18/2007 74044 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONST-BCR/SLVR BULLET 2505510 R46412 18,522.30 $78.75 1/18/2007 1 74042 IMERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INC IRECYCLING FEES -BATTERIES 1 1155515 1 44000 1 608.801 $608.80 1/18/2007 1 74043 IMOBILE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INCORP HELIUM TANK REFILL 1 0015333 1 41200 1 8.001 $8.00 1/18/2007 1 74044 IMOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES INC REPEATER SVCS -11/21-12120 1 0014440 1 42130 1 78.751 $78.75 1/18/2007 1 74045 IMUNICIPAL COURT POMONA JUDICIAL DIS NOV'06 PRKG CITE FEES 1 001 1 32230 1 1,700.00 $1,700.00 1/18/2007 1 74046 IMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES PROF SVCS - OCT 1 0015510 1 45221 1 376.871 $2,017.50 Page 11 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 1/18/2007 74046... MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES PROF SVCS - OCT PROF SVCS -OCT 0015551 0015510 45221 R45221 628.13 1,012.50 $2,017.50 ... 1/18/2007 1 74047 1OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 1OFFICE SUPPLIES - DBC 1 0015333 1 41200 1 56.911 $56.91 1/18/2007 74048 ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-B/CYN RD 1385538 42210 55.00 $185.00 1/18/2007 ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-PNTRA PK 0015340 42210 75.00 1/18/2007 74050 ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-SYC PK 0015340 42210 55.00 $149.00 1/18/2007 1 74049 IP & D CONSULTANTS INC PROF SVCS-ANNEXTN 0015210 I R44220 1 437.30 $437.30 1/18/2007 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHMBR MTG - COUNCIL 0014010 42325 1 15.00 1/18/2007 1 74050 IPRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CAREERTRACK SEMINAR-CRIBBINS 0014030 1 42340 149.001 $149.00 1/18/2007 1 74051 1PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES LP IFIRE ALARM REPAIR -DBC 0015333 1 42210 1 75.001 $75.00 1/18/2007 74052 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHMBR MTG-COUNCIL 0014010 42325 15.00 $40.00 1/18/2007 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHMBR MTG - COUNCIL 0014010 42325 1 15.00 1/18/2007 74056 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHMBR MTG - COUNCIL 0014010 42325 10.00 $225.00 1/18/2007 1 74053 IREINBERGER PRINTWERKS PRINT SVC -ABSENCE FORMS 0014090 1 42110 308.781 $308.78 1/18/2007 74054 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC TR SIGNAL MAINT-DEC 0015554 1 45507 3,284.32 $8,320.20 1/18/2007 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC TR SIGNAL MAINT-DEC 0015554 1 45507 5,035.88 1/18/2007 74055 IS C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC MESSAGE BOARDS RENTAL 0015554 1 42130 1 2,540.001 $2,540.00 1/18/2007 SHRED IT LOS ANGELES PROF SVCS 0014030 1 44000 222.75 1/18/2007 1 74056 ISCCOC DEPT OF ANTHROPOLOGY IRECORDS SVCS-SYC CYN 2505310 1 46415 1 225.001 $225.00 1{18/2007 74057 ISECTRAN SECURITY INC. ICOURIER SVCS - FY 06/07 0014090 1 44000 302.641 $302.64 1/18/2007 1 74058 SHRED IT LOS ANGELES PROF SVCS - DOC DEST 0014030 44000 405.00 $627.75 1/18/2007 SHRED IT LOS ANGELES PROF SVCS 0014030 1 44000 222.75 1/18/2007 1 74059 ISIGN DEPOT INC SIGN FOR CITY HALL 1 0014090 1 41200 1 29.541 $29.54 1/18/2007 74060 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT- DISTRICT#38 1385538 1 42126 12.81 $5,598.93 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT- DISTRICT#41 1415541 1 42126 28.21 Page 12 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 74060... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - OB CENTER 0015333 42126 4,819.39 $5,598.93... 1/18/2007 74063 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT -TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 82.05 $591.25 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 51.76 1/18/2007 74064 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 52.69 $1,584.00 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT -TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 72.30 1/18/2007 74065 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 99.95 $15A0 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 53.43 1/18/2007 74066 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 50.34 $81.07 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 93.91 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 54.63 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 61.93 1/18/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 33.07 1/18/2007 ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT - TR CONTROL 0015510 42126 32.46 1/18/2007 74061 SPARKLETTS SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 0014090 41200 204.55 $214.30 1/18/2007 SPARKLETTS EQ RENT -CITY HALL 0014090 42130 9.75 1/18/2007 74062 STITCHES UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY STAFF SHIRTS-PWKS 0015554 41250 207.84 $207.84 1/18/2007 TRANE SERVICE GROUP HVAC MAINT - DBC 0015333 42210 377.50 1/18/2007 1 74063 ISTUBBIES PROMOTIONS jPRMTNL ITEMS - PUB INFO 0014095 1 41400 1 591.251 $591.25 1/18/2007 74064 SUNNYHILLS CLEANERS UPHOLSTERY SVCS - DBC 0015333 1 42210 1 1,584.001 $1,584.00 1/18/2007 74065 ITHREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DIST ILEADERSHIP MTG-COUNCIL 1 0014010 1 42325 15.001 $15A0 1/18/2007 74066 ITOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC COPIER MAINT - DBC 1 0015333 1 42200 81.071 $81.07 1/18/2007 74067 TRANE SERVICE GROUP QTRLY HVAC MAINT- DBC 0015333 42210 849.00 $2,892.10 1/18/2007 TRANE SERVICE GROUP HVAC MAINT - DBC 0015333 42210 377.50 1/18/2007 74069 TRANE SERVICE GROUP HVAC MAINT - DBC 0015333 42210 1,665.60 $110.00 1/18/2007 74068 ITRENCH PLATE RENTAL CO JECUIPMT RENTAL 1 0015554 1 42130 1 120.001 $120.00 1/18/2007 74069 IJOANNA UH IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34780 1 110.Ool $110.00 1/18/2007 74070 JUNITED PARCEL SERVICE IPOSTAGE - PW—KS 1 0015554 1 41250 1 11.521 $11.52 Page 13 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number 1 Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 74071 JUNITED STATES TREASURY 4QTR 941 ADD'L TAX 001 21103 8.28 $8.28 1/18/2007 1 74072 JUS HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL GROUP PC PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 1 0014060 1 42345 1 110.001 $110.00 1/18/2007 74073 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC MAINT - PETERSON PK 0015340 42210 950.00 $1,850.00 1/18!2007 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC IMAINT-SNOWFEST 1 0015340 42210 900.00 1/18/2007 74074 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH. SVCS - GENERAL 0014090 42125 29.69 $853.10 1/18/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH. SVCS - GENERAL 0014090 42125 599.46 1/18/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH. SVCS - INFO TO GO 0014090 42125 110.01 1/18/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PHONE- HERITAGE PK 0015340 42125 24.34 1/18/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PHONE -PETERSON PK 0015340 42125 89.60 1/18/2007 1 74075 IVERIZON CALIFORNIA JPH. SVCS - ACCESS MODEM 1 0014090 1 42125 1 61.69 $61.69 1/18/2007 74076 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DBC 0015333 42126 150.43 $21,020.53 1/18/2007 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST #39 1395539 42126 3,963.40 1/18/2007 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST #41 1415541 42126 3,732.89 1/18/2007 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 4,628.87 1/18/2007 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST #38 1385538 42126 8,544.94 1/18/2007 74077 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 156.80 $1,968.50 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 156.80 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 156.80 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 109.50 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 156.80 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 156.80 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 109.50 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 109.50 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 109.50 1118/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 127.40 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 127.40 1/18/2007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 109.50 1/1812007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 127.40 1/1812007 WARREN SIECKE CONST INSPECTION -SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 127.40 1/18/2007 IWARREN SIECKE ICONST INSPECTION SIGNALS 2505510 R46412 127.40 Page 14 Check Date I Check City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Vendor Name I Transaction Description Fund/ Dept I Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount 1/18/2007 74078 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR 0015340 42210 105.74 $2,027.61 1/18/2007 74081 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MAINT SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 574.80 $7,304.98 1/18/2007 74082 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MAINT SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 510.31 $207.08 1/18/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR 0015333 41200 836.76 1/18/2007 74079 WELLS FARGO BANK CREDIT MEMO - I.T. 0014070 41200 -399.00 $1,581.02 1/18/2007 74081 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 69.64 $7,304.98 1/18/2007 74082 WELLS FARGO BANK SUP - SR. HOLIDAY DNR 0015350 41200 48.42 $207.08 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUP- SR. HOLIDAY DNR 0015350 41200 120.00 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - RECYCLING 1155516 41200 638.61 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK PUB WKS - SITE VISIT TC 0015510 42325 210.60 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - I.T 0015510 41200 519.00 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - PW 0015510 41200 22.37 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - PUBLIC WORK 0015510 41200 281.59 1/18/2007 WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES - COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 69.79 1/18/2007 74080 IWEST COAST MEDIA E -WASTE COLLECTION 1 1155515 1 42115 1 525.001 $525.00 1/19/2007 74081 JIMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING CORP ICATERING-HOLIDAY CELEB 0014090 1 42325 1 7,304.981 $7,304.98 1/25/2007 1 74082 JAGRICULTURAL COM WGHTS & MEASURES ICOYOTE CONTROL SVCS-NOV 1 0014431 1 45406 1207.081 656.00 $207.08 1/25/2007 74083 AMERICOMP GROUP INC SUPPLIES -TONER 0014070 45000 268.46 $1,064.10 1/25/2007 AMERICOMP GROUP INC SUPPLIES -TONER 0014070 45000 139.64 1/25/2007 AMERICOMP GROUP INC SUPPLIES -TONER 0014070 45000 656.00 1/25/2007 74084 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 23012 81.00 $2,090.00 1/25/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 34650 -81.00 1/25/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 34650 -295.20 1/25/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP PROF.SVCS-EN 04-467 001 23012 450.00 1/25/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP PROF.SVCS-EN 04-467 001 23012 1,640.00 1/25/2007 ARROYO GEOTECHNICAL CORP ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 23012 295.20 1/25/2007 74085 IBENESYST IFLEX ADMIN SVCS -1ST QTR 0014060 42346 85A0 $85.00 Page 15 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 112512007 74086 BENESYST 1/26/07-P/R DEDUCTIONS MOO21105 381.91 $381.91 1/25/2007 I 74087 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 1,455.31 $8,708.61 1/25/2007 74089 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 261.96 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 34430 -261.96 15.00 1/25/2007 $15.00 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 425.00 1 47200 1/25/2007 $7,392.00 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 76.50 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 34430 -76.50 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 229.00 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 41.22 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 8 001 34430 -41.22 1/25/2007 ICIVIC BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FER 96-2 B 001 23011 6,599.30 1/25/2007 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 23010 1,187.87 1 /2 512 00 7 IBONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEE-FER 96-2 B 001 34430 -1,187.87 1/2512007 I 74088 IBSN SPORTS CORP SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0015350 41200 ----1-81-6T8 $181.6q 1/25/2007 74089 IBUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYS INC. IPH SVCS -JAN 07 0014070 42125 214.251 $214.25 1/25/2007 74090 —FCA PARKS & REC SOC -DIS XIII MTG-C MURPHEY 0015350 42325 15.00 1/25/2007 $15.00 1/25/2007 74091 ICALIFORNIA JPIA IRISK PROPERTY INS -2007 5104081 1 47200 7,392.001 $7,392.00 1/25/2007 74092 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. ]EQ J1/25/2007 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. -SHERIFF EQ -SHERIFF 1284411 1284411 46250 46250 103.90 1,028.38 $11,566.25 $1,132.28 1/25/2007 74093 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 522.50 $11,566.25 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 285.00 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 356.25 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 47.50 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 712.50 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 71.25 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC CONSULTANT SVCS-PLNG 0015210 44000 308.75 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2002-63 001 23010 142.50 1/25/2007 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2002-63 001 23010 25.65 1/25/2007 ICIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2002-63 001 34430 -25.65 Page 16 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Ch k N Fund/ Dept ec umber Vendor Name Transaction Description 1/25/2007 74093... CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2005-147 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2005-147 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2004-85 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2004-85 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2004-85 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-224 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-224 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-224 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-189 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-189 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-189 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-235 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-235 1/25/2007 001 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-235 Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 0014010 001 23010 6,222.50 $11,566.25... 001 23010 1,120.05 001 34430 -1,120.05 74095 001 23010 23.75 001 0015220 001 23010 4,28 34300 45000 001 34430 -4.28 74096 001 23010 213.75 001 23010 38.48 579.00 001 34430 -38.48 001 23010 2,493.75 JDAY & NITE COPY CENTER 001 23010 448.88 001 34430 -448.88 —TT25/2007T 001 23010 166.25 001 23010 29.93 PROF.SVCS-SS/CC MTG 001 34430 -29.93 $200.00 1/25/2007 74094 CLOUT CLOUT MTG-COUNCIL 0014010 42325 20.001$20.00 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74095 D & J MUNICIPAL SERVICES INC ID & J MUNICIPAL SERVICES INC REFUND -BUILDING PERMIT BLDG & SFTY SVCS-NOV 06 001 0015220 $33,252.12 34300 45000 -51.00 33,303.12 1/25/2007 74096 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC IDESIGN SVCS -PARKS 2505310 $579.00 46415 579.00 1/25/2007 74097 JDAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINT SVCS-CAFR 0014050 $83.35 42110 83.35 —TT25/2007T 74098 IDENNIS CAROL PROF.SVCS-SS/CC MTG 0014030 $200.00 44000 200.00 1/25/2007 74099 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRE-EMPLOYMENT FINGERPRNT 0014060 $288.00 42345 288.00 1/25/2007 74100 IKEN DESFORGES REIMB-CCNA/CCDA TRNG 0014070 $50.89 42340 50.89 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74101 DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL COMM ORG SUPPORT FUND COMM ORG SUPPORT FUND 0114010 0114010 $0.00 42355 42355 -100.00 100.00 1/25/2007 74102 IDIANA CHO &ASSOCIATESCDBG CONSULTANT-NOV/DEC $2,800.00 1255215 44000 2,800.001 Page 17 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept 1 21114 Acct # 1/25/2007 74103 EXECUTIVE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES -PROMO ITEMS 0014095 0015333 41400 Amount Total Check Amount 1,010.62 $1,010.62 1/25/2007 74104 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ISLRYATTCHMT-1/26/07 001 1 21114 390.401 $390.40 1/25/2007 74105 GLENN'S REFRIGERATION MAINT-DBC 0015333 42210 680.00 $680.00 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74106 74107 GO LIVE TECHNOLOGY INC GRAND MOBIL CONSULTANT SVCS-I.T. IVEH MAINT-NGHBRHD IMP 0014070 0015230 44000 42200 4,800.00 392.23 $4,800.00 $392.23 23012 1/25/2007 JANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -FEB HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74108 GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS SLOPE REPAIR -DBC SLOPE REPAIR -DBC 2505310 2505310 46415 46415 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. 13,427.50 325.00 $13,752.50 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74109 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-EN 04-467 ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 001 23012 23012 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 34650 1/25/2007 0015350 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 34650 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 23012 1/25/2007 JANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -FEB HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 34650 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-EN 04-467 001 23012 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF -SVCS -PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 1/25/2007 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-EN 04-467 001 23012 1/25/2007 IHALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 04-467 001 23012 1/25/2007 I 74110 IMARCY HILARIO REIMB-NTMP MTG 00155101 42325 1 $217.35 1/25/2007 1 74111 CARMEN HURTADO RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74112 JIMPERIAL PAVING CO INC IMPERIAL PAVING CO INC RETENTION-NTMP PROJ 1PROF.SVCS-NTMP PROJ 250 2505510 20300 R46412 $35.00 Page 18 7,007.00 6,542.33 $13,549.33 1/25/2007 74113 INLAND ROUNDBALL OFFICIALS OFFICIAL SVCS -JAN 07 0015350 45300 440.00 $440.00 1/25/2007 74114 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY JANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -FEB 0014431 1 45403 8,500.671 $8,500.67 Page 18 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # 1/25/2007 Amount 1/25/2007 74115 JACK TANAKA RIEMB-LEAGUE MTG 0014010 42330 83.00 743.50 10.98 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74116 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP LEGAL SVCS-AERA ENERGY LEGAL SVCS-P/WORKS DEC 0014020 0014020 44021 44020 1/25/2007 1,029.20 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP LEGAL SVCS -SCRIBBLES DEC 0014020 44021 83.00 743.50 1/25/2007 11.25 -129.16 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP LEGAL SVCS -SCE DEC 0014020 44021 820.80 1/25/2007 JEMPL COMP PRCH LOAN JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP GEN LEGAL SVCS -DEC 06 0014020 44020 4,150.00 1/25/2007 001 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP LEGAL SVCS -COM DEV DEC 0014020 44020 1,593.60 1/25/2007 ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-208 JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP LEGAL SVCS -COMM SVCS DEC 0014020 1 44020 1 49.80 1/25/2007 74117 KENS HARDWARE 1/25/2007 0015333 KENS HARDWARE 1/25/2007 92.39 KENS HARDWARE 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 KENS HARDWARE PPLIES-PARKS PPLIES-DBC PPLIES-GENERAL PPLIES-RECREATION 0015340 42210 LA HABRA FENCE CO INC 494.43 0015333 41200 92.39 0014090 41200 1/25/2007 21.61 0015350 41200 001 91.89 Total Check Amount $10.98 $8,469.90 $700.32 1/25/2007 74118 LA HABRA FENCE CO INC SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 42210 655.981 $655.98 1/25/2007 74119 JERIC LAI REFUND -BLDG PERMIT 001 34300 11.25 -129.16 51.00$51.00 1/25/2007 74120 ILAUREN M HIDALGO JEMPL COMP PRCH LOAN 001 13135 1/25/2007 1,628.411 $1,628.41 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74121 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-209 CONSULTING SVCS-PLNG 001 0015210 34430 44250 -22.73 $2,928.75 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-213 001 34430 11.25 -129.16 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. PROF -SVCS -FPL 2006-209 001 23010 126.25 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-209 001 23010 22.73 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-208 001 34430 -219.36 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-213 001 23010 717.55 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-213 001 23010 129.16 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-201 001 34430 -133.66 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-208 001 23010 1,218.65 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-208 001 23010 219.36 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-241 001 34430 -20.25 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-201 001 23010 742.55 1/25/2007 LDM ASSOCIATES INC. ADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-201 001 23010 133.66 1/25/2007 JLDM ASSOCIATES INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL 2006-241 001 23010 112.50 Page 19 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/25/2007 74121... LDM ASSOCIATES INC. JADMIN FEE -FPL 2006-241 001 23010 20.25 $2,928.75 ... 1/25/2007 74122 ILEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ILEAGUE MTG-COUNCIL 0014010 1 42325 35.00 $35.00 1/25/2007 74123 ITACK LEE RECREATION REFUND 001 134780 53.00 $53.00 1/25/2007 74124 LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. ENGRAVING SVCS -BADGES 0014090 42113 22.86 $45.48 1/25/2007 1 LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. ENGRAVING SVCS -BADGES 0014090 1 42113 22.62 1/25/2007 74125 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CONTRACT SVCS -DEC 06 0014411 45401 367,264.08 $388,099.41 1/25/2007 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. SPCL EVENTS -SCRIBBLES DEC 0014411 45402 2,063.82 1/25/2007 74129 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. STAR DEPUTY SVCS -DEC 0014411 45401 9,224.11 $5,453.41 1/25/2007 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. SPL EVENTS -SCRIBBLES NOV 0014411 45402 2,126.36 1/25/2007 74130 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CALVARY CHAPEL -DEC O6 1 0014411 45402 7,421.04 $95.00 1/25/2007 1 74126 ILOS ANGELES ZOO EXCURSION -LA ZOO 1 0015350 1 42410 1 438.00 $438.00 1/25/2007 74127 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT SUPPLIES -HERITAGE PK 0015340 42210 55.75 $433.00 1/25/2007 1 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 71.77 1/25/2007 74129 LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 42210 305.48 $5,453.41 1/25/2007 74128 IMC STRIPING PRINT -COPY FEE 001 1 36650 1 12.501 $12.50 1/25/2007 1 NEW MILLENNIUM CONSTRUCTION INC HIP PROG-23958 G/SPRINGS 1 1255215 1 44000 350.00 1/25/2007 74129 IMCE CORPORATION VEGETATION CONTROL -DEC 0015558 1 45508 5,453.41 $5,453.41 1/25/2007 74130 JANIL MEHTA RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 95.001 $95.00 1/25/2007 74131 IMUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION INTERNET FEE-ANNL CODE 0014030 44000 350.001 $350.00 1/25/2007 74132 NEW MILLENNIUM CONSTRUCTION INC HIP PROG-23958 G/SPRINGS 1255215 1 44000 1,385.00 $1,735.00 1/25/2007 1 NEW MILLENNIUM CONSTRUCTION INC HIP PROG-23958 G/SPRINGS 1 1255215 1 44000 350.00 1/25/2007 1 74133 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS JAIRTIME CHRGS-P/W,C/S,C/D 1 0014090 42130 545.11 $545.11 1/25/2007 1PROF-SVCS-EN 74134 JARVID PATEL 06-517 001 23012 500.00 $245.00 1/25/2007 ARVID PATEL _1 ADMIN FEE -EN 06-517 001 34650 -255.00 Page 20 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 �lheck Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct #tal 1 42129 Check Amount /25/2007 74135 CAMERON PATTON OFFICIAL SVCS -JAN 07 0015350 1 45300 440.001 $440.00 1/25/200774136 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH ADMIN FEE FEB 07 -HEALTH INS PREMS ADMIN FEE 0014060 001 0014090 40093 21105 1 4---- ----1/25/2007 113.87 24,374.82 $24,650.29 192.69 52.50 $52.50 ISMART & FINAL SUPPLIES -BINGO 0015350 41200 180.76 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74137 PERS RETIREMENT FUND PERS RETIREMENT FUND PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-ER RETIRE CONTRIB-EE SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 001 001 _[_ 21109 21109 21109 13,463.65 8,528.25 46.50 $22,038.40 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74138 PERS RETIREMENT FUND PERS RETIREMENT FUND PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-ER RETIRE CONTRIB-EE SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 001 001 21109 21109 21109 42126 54.13 329.77 208.88 8.00 $546.65 1/25/2007 74139 PIPER JAFFRAY BOND REMARKETING FEES 0014090 1 42129 59.00 545.58 227.33 4,184.11 $4,184.11 ISHRED IT LOS ANGELESDISPOSAL-FILES REINBERGER PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -ENVELOPES 0015510 42110 42110 73.61 911.46 1/25/2007 74140 1PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES LP ALARM SVCS -DBC 0015333 1 42210 42110 192.69 52.50 $52.50 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74141 REINBERGER PRINTWERKS REINBERGER PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -LETTERHEAD PRINT SVCS -LETTERHEAD 0014090 0014090 42110 59.00 545.58 227.33 $1,405.09 1/25/2007 ISHRED IT LOS ANGELESDISPOSAL-FILES REINBERGER PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -ENVELOPES 0015510 42110 42110 73.61 911.46 1/25/2007 REINBERGER PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -LABELS 0014090 42110 192.69 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74142 74143ISTMMPSON IMARY SALCIDO GRAPHICSPRINT RECREATION REFUND SVCS -CITY LOGO 001 0014095 1 34740 41200 59.00 545.58 $59.00 $545.58 1/25/2007 74144 ISHRED IT LOS ANGELESDISPOSAL-FILES 0014030 44000 222.75 $222.75 1/25/2007 74145 ISMART & FINAL SUPPLIES -BINGO 0015350 41200 180.76 $180.76 1/25/2007 74146 SO COAST AIR QUALITY MGT DISTRICT LEASE -CITY HALL FEB 0014090 42140 21,204.75 $21,204.75 1/25/2007 74147 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 54.13 $54.13 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74148 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC LABOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC LABOR H CONF-MCLEAN/DOYLE H/R CONF-MCLEAN/DOYLE 0014030 0014030 1 42325 1 42325 140.00 -140.00 Page 21 $0.00 Page 21 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description I Fund/ Dept I Acct # I Amount I Total Check Amount 1/25/2007 74149 STANDARD INSURNCE OF OREGON FEB 07 -LIFE INS PREMS 1/25/2007 ISTANDARD INSURNCE OF OREGON FEB 07-STD/LTD 001 001 1/25/2007 74155 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -HERITAGE PK 1/25/2007 THE GAS COMPANY 001 001 21106 21112 1,069.27 1,533.70 $2,602.91 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74150 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION USE TAX DUE -OCT -DEC 06 SALES TAX DUE -OCT -DEC 06 001 001 20710 36650 148.09 62.91 $211.00 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74151 UNGARD PENTAMATION TSUNGARD PENTAMATION COMP MAINT-ANNL COMP MAINT-ANNL 0014070 0014070 42205 42205 5,266.36 4,476.69 $9,743.05 1/25/2007 74152 ANITA TANG RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 35.00 $35.00 1/25/2007 74153 CATHY TEOH RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 35.00 $35.00 1/25/2007 74154 THE COMDYN GROUP INC CONSULTING SVCS-I.T 0014070 44000 2,100.00 $2,100.00 E0015340 0015333 42126 42126 351.45 1,730.45 $2,081.90 1/25/2007 74156 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER SUBSCRIPTION SVCS 0014090 42320 72.33 $72.33 1/25/2007 74157 TIME WARNER MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL 0014010 42130 44.95 $44.95 1/25/2007 74158 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC COPIER MAINT-DBC 0015333 42200 65.34 $65.34 1/25/2007 74159 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGNTS-303248 01/26/07-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 5,381.05 $5,381.05 1/25/2007 1/25/2007 74160 IVERIZON CALIFORNIA VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH-SVCSPK PH.SVCS-SYC CYN PK 0015340 0015340 42125 42125 95.24 274.56 $369.80 1/25/2007 74161 VIDEO MARKETING SERVICE REFUND -BR 2006-972 001 34560 10.00 $10.00 1/25/2007 74162 RAMONA VOGE RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 55.00 $55.00 1/25/2007 74163 W.W. GRAINGER INC. SUPPLIES -RECREATION REFUN 0015340 42210 121.71 $121.71 1/25/2007 74164 JAY WEI pl! pCCI IAIn o�nn LAGAN I 001 23002 1:1111 1/25/2007 74155 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -HERITAGE PK 1/25/2007 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -DBC Page 22 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 1/25/2007 74165 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT-DEC 06 0015558 45509 11,003.50 $19,769.50 1/25/2007 74167 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE WATERING -DEC 06 0015558 45510 314.00 1/25/2007 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT-NOV 06 0015558 45509 8,138.00 1/25/2007 74168 IWEST COAST ARBORISTS INC ITREE WATERING-NOV 06 0015558 1 45510 1 314.00 $100.00 1/2512007 1 74166 IWIRE 4 WIRELESS INC COMP MAINT-DEC 06 0014070 1 42205 1 1,486.15 $1,486.15 1/30/2007 1 JIMPAC IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -HOLIDAY CELEB 1 0014090 1 42325 529.13 1/25/2007 1 74167 PAUL WRIGHT A/V SVCS-P/C,CNCL,T/D 0014090 1 44000 1 280.00$280.00 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 42325 278.11 1/26/2007 1 74168 IDIAMOND BAR GIRLS SOFTBALL COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FND 0114010 1 42355 1 100.001 $100.00 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES CCNA TRNG-I.T. 0014070 42340 179.21 1/26/2007 1 74169 ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC LABOR HIR CONF-MCLEAN/DOYLE 1 0014030 1 42325 1 140.001 $140.00 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -SNOW FEST 0015350 41200 434.22 1/30/2007 1 74170 JGFOA CAFR REVIEW- FY 2006 1 0014050 1 44000 1 415.00 $415.00 1/30/2007 74171 GOVERNMENT SERVICES MTGS-RECREATION 0015350 41200 42.97 $572.10 1/30/2007 1 JIMPAC IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -HOLIDAY CELEB 1 0014090 1 42325 529.13 1/30/2007 74172 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES PROMO ITEMS -GENERAL 0014090 41400 42.99 $2,561.77 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT 0015554 41250 323.70 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES EQ MAINT-DBC 0015333 42200 490.53 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 42325 278.11 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MAINT-SOFTWARE 0014070 42205 439.00 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES CCNA TRNG-I.T. 0014070 42340 179.21 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES PUBLICATION-I.T. 0014070 42320 24.95 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -SNOW FEST 0015350 41200 434.22 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES TRNG-I.T. 0014070 42325 18.62 1/30/2007 1IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MTG-P/WORKS 0015510 1 42330 1 330.44 1/30/2007 1 74173 JIMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS 0015310 1 42200 1 10.811 $10.81 1/30/2007 74174 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES HOLIDAY CELEB-SUPPLIES 0014090 42325 71.12 $5,072.74 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES TRNG-I AZIZ 0014070 42330 1,022.63 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES TRNG-E MAGALLANES 0015240 42315 150.00 1/30/2007 IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MEMBERSHIP DUES-FONG 0015240 42315 215.00 1/30/2007 1IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES MTG-FONG 0015240 42340 65.00 Page 23 $1,433,565.06 Page 24 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 01/11/07 thru 01/31/2007 Check Date 1!30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/20070014090 1/3012007 1/30/20070014090 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/20070015333 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 Check Number Vendor Name 74174... IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES IMPAC GOVERNMENT SERVICES Transaction Description MTG-P/WORKS MTG-PLNG POSTAGE -GENERAL SUPPLIES -HAUNTED HOUSE SUPPLIES -GENERAL MEMBERSHIP DUES -D LIU PUBLICATION-I.T. SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS SUPPLIES -DBC SEMINAR -FINANCE TRNG-I.T. RENEWAL -SOFTWARE PHOTO-REC GUIDE PUBLICATION-P/INFO SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS Fund/ Dept 0015510 0015240 0015350 0015510 0014070 0015310 0014050 0014070 1125553 0014095 0014095 0015340 Acct # Amount Total Check Amount 42325 55.08 $5,072.74... 41200 135.64 42120 117.00 41200 845.62 41200 55.11 42315 157.50 42320 99.00 41200 44.95 41200 547,28 42340 175.00 42330 416,94 42205 360.00 42330 300.00 44000 218.00 4120021.87 $1,433,565.06 Page 24 CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man TITLE: Treasurer's Statement — Decemb rY26 RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact BACKGROUND: Agenda # 6 5 Meeting Date: Feb. 6, 2007 AGENDA REPORT Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. This statement shows the November cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances, and the effective yield earned from investments. This statement also includes a separate investment portfolio report which details the activities of the City's investments. All investments have been made in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. REVIEW BY: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director Departe t Head Attachments: Treasurer's Statement, Investment Portfolio Report Assis nt City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT December 31, 2006 All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's jteestimZeperidkres. James DeStefano, Treasurer BEGINNING BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS TRIN OUTRS ENDING GENERAL FUND LIBRARY SERVICES FUND $26,173,602.42 1,765,995.73 $1,568,545.27 $95,131.69 BALANCE COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FD 0.00 $26,466,184.57 GAS TAX FUND TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD665,685.65 1'217.32 92,278,27 100.00 0.00 1,117.32 TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD 1,109,806.04 158,876.29 104,711.31 (604,360.12) 153,603.80 ISTEA Fund 1,691,614.28 89,950.46 0.00 (214,499.21) 1,163,971.02 1,567,065.53 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD AB2928-TR CONGESTION RELIEF 490,975.39 11,750.00 FD 879 11,982 72 (46,417.20) 0.00 AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD TRAILS & BIKEWAYS FD 981 49 4'723.98 68,655.25 19,661.63 2,801.91 (255,000.00) 444,325.47 429,705.47 PARK FEES FD (149,497.00) 105,554.00 85,514.97 PROP A -SAFE PARKS ACT FUND 106,575.00 206.31 (43,943.00) PARK & FACILITIES DEVEL. FD (2,016. 106,781.31 COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD 1, (84,652.8833 20,632.98 (84,985.51) (274,730.79) (2,016.41) 1,703,555.0202 CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY FD NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD 290,682.42 1,840.13 2,563.19 76,811.00 (10,737.70) CA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP PRGI 375,088.20 3,491.27 (105,809.62) 186,712.93 LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD 791.40 326,689.73 LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD (55,463.20) 102,800.62 23,479.05 75,879.60 LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD GRAND AV CONST FUND 37,796.19 66,210.44 34,213.50 49,697.83 6,167.78 6,899.23 23,858.37 97,838.85 CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD 0.00 (1,720,622.04) 77,012.10 0.00 SELF INSURANCE FUND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,355,403.61 14,665.66 504,327.13 1,328,874.25 (896,074.92) COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 164,732.61 1,762.63 1, 370, 069.10 91,724.13166,495.24 PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY FUNI 966.74 TOTALS 108 478.00 , 401.29 4)00,414,498.46 $2,512,2 42,897.67 92,690.87 65,981.62 SUMMARY OF CASH: ,,5.26280.86 $0.00 $33,652, DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT PAYROLL ACCOUNT ($877,609. CHANGE FUND 9,775.544 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 250.00 1,000.00 TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS INVESTMENTS: ($866,583.61) US TREASURY Money Market Acct. $3,519.83 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 26,449,363.02 FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTES 81000,000.00 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT: US TREASURY Money Market Account LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 65,981.62 (Bond Proceeds Account) 0.00 TOTAL INVESTMENTS $34,518,864.47 TOTAL CASH $33,652 280.86 Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment accounts set up. The regular account's funds are available for withdrawal within 24 hours account's Fund . There are two LAIF . withdrawals require 30 days notice. In addition, the City has started investing These The LAIF Bond Proceeds investments are detailed on the attached Investment Report. in longer term investments. All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's jteestimZeperidkres. James DeStefano, Treasurer CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REPORT for the Month of December 2006 Institution Investment Type Rating Purchase Maturity Date Date Term State of California Local Agency Inv Fund Wells Fargo Bank US Treasury Money Market Union Bank -(Fiscal Agent) US Treasury Money Market Union Bank -(Fiscal Agent) Local Agency Inv Fund AAA AAA AAA AAA Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Farm Credit Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA 10/20/05 04/20/07 1.5 Yr 11/09/05 05/09/07 1.5 Yrs 09/28/05 09/28/07 2.0 Yrs 09/27/05 03/27/08 2.5 Yrs 09/12/06 09/12/08 2.0 Yrs 11/06/06 11/06/08 2.0 Yrs 11/07/06 05/07/09 2.5 Yrs 12/29/06 06/29/09 2.5 Yrs 11/14/06 08/14/09 2.75 Yrs Totals for month Less Investments matured during the month Total Investments: 2005-06 Actual Interest Income 2006-07 Budgeted Interest Income Actual Year -To -Date Interest Income Percent of Interest Received to Budget Amount Fair Market Inonthlyurre terest CInteresMonth At Cost Value Arrn pori o, ---;.._ 26,449,363.02 26,434,668.47 113,048.99 $3,519.83 3,519.83 - 65,981.62 65,981.62 11000,000.00 11000,000.00 11000,000.00 11000,000.00 11000,000.00 1, 000, 000.00 1,000,000.00 1, 000, 000.00 1,000, 000.00 997,300.00 998,000.00 993,400.00 992, 000.00 999, 800.00 999,200.00 998,400.00 996,900.00 998,300.00 3,541.67 3,833.33 3,625.00 3,783.33 4,583.33 4,550.00 4,416.67 4,591.67 I\Q LC T lelo - 5.129% 5.129% 3,519.83 4.498% 4.498% 401.29 5.120% 5.120% - 0.000% 0.000% 4.250% 4.250% - 4.600% 4.600% 4.350% 4.350% 4.540% 4.540% 13,750.00 5.500% 5.500% 5.500% 5.500% 5.460% 5.460% 5.300% 5.300% 5.510% 5.510% $ 35,518,864.47 $ 35,477,469.92 $ 127,832.32 $ 17,671.12 (1,000,000.00) $ 34,518,864.47 $1,307,302.01 $851,500.00 $472,106.34 55.444% Agenda # 6. 6 (a ) Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man g TITLE: Rejection of Claim — Filed by Deb ie etone on behalf of William Schoenhofen — December 5, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Carl Warren & Co., the City's claims administrator, recommends the City Council reject the claim filed on behalf of William Schoenhofen. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial implication associated with rejecting this claim. The claim for damage is for the sum of approximately $23,606.55. Should the claim be successful, it will be paid by the JPIA. BACKGROUND: On December 5, 2006, Debbie Tetone on behalf of her father, William Schoenhofen, filed a Claim for Damages with the City alleging that while walking up Palomino Dr. Mr. Schoenhofen tripped and fell on a lifted piece of sidewalk which caused injury to his right knee cap. Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Management Service, has recommended the City deny the Claim filed by Ms. Tetone. Upon action by the City Council, appropriate notice shall be sent to the claimant and Carl Warren & Co. : PREPARED BY: Tommye Crib ys, City Clerk REVIEWED BY: 'r David A. Doyle Asst. City Manager January 15, 2007 TO: The City of Diamond Bar ATTENTION: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk RE: Claim Schoenhofen vs. The City of Diamond Bar Claimant William Schoenhofen D/Event 6/7/2006 Recd Y/Office 12/5/2006 Our File S-1442464-RWQ We have received and reviewed the above claim and request that you take the action indicated below: CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. cc: CJPIA w/enc. Attn.: Executive Director Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 770 Placentia Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870-6832 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 572-5201) • (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 961-8131 Agenda # 6. 6 (b) Meeting Date; February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL ` AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manli g TITLE: Rejection of Claim — Filed bylDanied J. Koretoff — October 27, 2006 RECOMMENDATION: Carl Warren & Co., the City's claims administrator, recommends the City Council reject the claim filed by Daniel J. Koretoff. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial implication associated with rejecting this claim. The claim for damage is for the sum of $188.07. Should the claim be successful, JPIA. it will be paid by the BACKGROUND: On October 27, 2006 Daniel J. Koretoff filed a Claim for Damages with the City alleging that while driving east bound on Grand Ave. in the City of Diamond Bar he hit a pothole in the street causing damage to his tire. Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Management Service, has recommended the City deny the Claim filed by Mr. Koretoff. Upon action by the City Council, appropriate notice shall be sent to the claimant and Carl Warren & Co. PREPARED BY: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk REVIEWED BY: Asst. City Manager January 18, 2007 `S ✓q�U 0lU . U� TO: The City of Diamond Bar ATTENTION: Tommye Cribbins, Assistant to City Clerk RE: Claim Claimant D/Event Rec'd Y/Office Our File Koretoff v Diamond Bar Daniel Koretoff 10/07/06 10/27/06 1440100DBQ We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: • • CLAIM REJECTION• Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL AN & COMPANY Deb Been CARL WARREN & CO. 10 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 770 Placentia Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870-6832 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 . Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 572-5200 9 (800) 572-6900 . Fax: (714) 961-8131 Agenda # 6 7 Meeting Date: February 6 2007 AGENDACITY COUNCIL REPORA TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man 4� TITLE: EXONERATION OF SURETY BO D NO. 6042581 IN THE AMOUNT OF $160,000.00 AND BOND NO. 6110216 IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000.00 POSTED BY PULTE HOME CORPORATION FOR TRACT 52267 TO COMPLETE DOMESTIC AND RECLAIMED WATER IMPROVEMENTS AND DECK REMOVAL. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the exoneration. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This action has no financial impact on the City. BACKGROUND: In accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City entered into agreement with the subdivider, Pulte Home Corporation, to complete various improvements for Tract No. 52267. The subdivider guaranteed faithful performance of said agreement by posting with the City surety bonds for grading, storm drain improvements, on-site street improvements, sanitary sewer improvements, off-site street improvements, domestic water and reclaimed water, landscape and irrigation, and monumentation. In addition to the bonds listed, an additional $8,000.00 bond was posted for a deck that was constructed without City approval with a model home. The bond was posted as guarantee that the deck would be removed. To date, the surety bonds for grading, domestic water and reclaimed water, on-site street improvements, and sanitary sewer improvements have been reduced. The monumentation bond was exonerated by Council on December 16, 2003. DISCUSSION: Upon receiving written request from Pulte Home Corporation on November 17, 2006, the Planning and Building & Safety Division as well as Public Works Department have verified completion of all conditions for the domestic and reclaimed water systems have been met and that the deck on the model home has indeed been removed. Additionally, the Walnut Valley Water District (District) has submitted formal letter stating that the District has no exceptions to the exoneration of the domestic and reclaimed water bond. The following surety bonds are recommended for exoneration: Surety Bond No. 6042581 in the amount of $160,000.00 Surety Bond No. 6110216 in the amount of $8,000.00 The remaining bonds are still under review by the City for exoneration. PREPARED BY: Kimberly Molina, Associate Engineer Date Prepared: January 29, 2007 REVIEWED BY: David G. Li '4Public of Public Works Attachments: LETTER OF REQUEST, November 17, 2006 LETTER FROM WVWD, August 19, 2003 2 pcl November 17, 2006 Kimberley Maleena Dept. of Public Works City of Diamond Bar 21825 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 Dear Kimberley: N 0 G We request that the subdivision bonds posted for this project be processed for release. These bonds include the following: Bond No. 6023786 Surety Co. Safeco Scope of Work Grading Bond Amount $502,276.80 $264,503.00 $233,367.00 $78,928.00 $500,000.00 $160,000.00 6023787 Safeco Storm drain improvements 6023788 6023789 6042559 6042581 6042582 6110216 Safeco Safeco Safeco Safeco Safeco Safeco Street improvements Sewer system improvements Off-site improvements Domestic & reclaim water Landscape &irrigation Deck removal $500,000.00 $8,000.00 Please call me if there is any additional information that you need in order to process this request. Sincerely, Marla Miller Assistant Community Development Manager Pulte Home Corporation Coastal Division 2 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 949.523.3700 949.623.3747 Direct Line 619.520.4616 Cell WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 271 South Brea Canyon Road • P.O. Box 508 Walnut, California 91789-3002 • (909) 595-1268 • (626) 964-6551 President Keith Gunn Website: www.wvwd.com • Fax: (909) 594-9532 Election Division V August 19, 2003. Edward N. Layton Vice President r� Election Division III William G. Wentworth Vice President Election Division I Edwin M. Hilden Mr. John L. Ilasin Assistant Treasurer Assistant Engineer Election Division 11 City of Diamond Bar Donald L. Nettles 21825 E. Copley Drive Director Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Election Division IV STAFF: RE: Request for Bond Exoneration for Tract 52267 Karen J. Powers Work Order 97-2353 General Manager Secretary / Treasurer Dear Mr. Ilasin: LEGAL COUNSEL: H. Jess Senecal In reply to your letter dated August 19, 2003, the District has no exception to the exoneration of the Domestic and Reclaimed Water Faithful Performance/Labor and Materials Bond for Tract 52267. Please contact me Ext. 234 if you have any questions or need any additional information. Very truly yours, WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Sheryl L. Shaw, P.E. Engineering and Planning Manager SLS:gb Cc: David G. Liu, Director of Public Works I:\WkOrders\Curren4Developer\972353 PulteTract52267\BondF-xonLet.doe Agenda # 6 8 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man TITLE: Transmittal of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report as prepared by the City Finance Department and the City's audit firm, Diehl, Evans and Company, L.L.P. for the year ended June 30, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The FY 2005-2006 annual audit has been completed by the City's independent auditing firm of Diehl, Evans and Company L.L.P. Part of the audit contract includes the completion, with staff's assistance, of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The City has received an unqualified audit report and there were no findings noted in the audit report. The contract also includes the preparation of the Single Audit Report on Federal Awards. This report is required when the City expends over $500,000 in Federal Funds. This report will be presented to the City Council at a later date when it becomes available. DISCUSSION: The City's Finance Department in concert with the City's independent auditing firm of Diehl, Evans and Company L. L. P. has prepared the Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). This report has been prepared in conformance with the requirements of GASB 34. As a result the report format includes Management Discussion and Analysis, Required Supplementary Information and the Government -wide Financial Statements which include the Statement of Net Assets and Statement of Activities. Page Two — City Council Agenda Report Transmittal of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report The Finance Department has submitted the CAFR to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for review and the certificate of excellence award program. The City has been honored to receive this award for the past eleven consecutive years. In the past the City had also submitted its CAFR to the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for its award program. The eligibility for CSMFO's program was changed this year. Due to the similarities in the programs City's that participate in the GFOA program are no longer eligible for the CSMFO's program. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson REVIEWED BY: Departm Head M0 Assis ant City Manager Attachments: FY 05-06 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report City of Diamond Bar, California Year ended June 30, 2006 h CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED .TUNE 30, 2006 Prepared by: FINANCE DEPARTMENT Linda G Magnuson Director of Finance CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Independent Auditors' Report 1 - 2 June 30, 2006 3-11 ' Basic Financial Statements: Page Government -wide Financial Statements: Number ' INTRODUCTORY SECTION: 15 ' Letter of Transmittal i - vi ' CSMFO Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting vii GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting viii ' Organization Chart ix List of Principal Officials x Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 22-23 FINANCIAL SECTION: ' Independent Auditors' Report 1 - 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information) 3-11 ' Basic Financial Statements: Government -wide Financial Statements: ' Statement of Net Assets 15 Statement of Activities 16 ' Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: 17 ' Balance Sheet Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet 18-19 to the Statement of Net Assets 21 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 22-23 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities 24 Proprietary Funds: Statement of Net Assets 25 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets 26 Statement of Cash Flows 27 ' Notes to Basic Financial Statements 28-50 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 FINANCIAL SECTION (CONTINUED): Page Number Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary Comparison Schedules: 53 General Fund 54 Proposition A Transit Special Revenue Fund 55 Note to Required Supplementary Information 56 Supplementary Information: Other Governmental Funds: Combining Balance Sheet 58 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 59 Other Special Revenue Funds: 60-61 Combining Balance Sheet 62-63 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 64-65 Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual: State Gas Tax Fund 66 Proposition C Transit Fund 67 Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) Special Revenue Fund 68 Integrated Waste Management Fund 69 Traffic Congestion Relief 70 Air Quality Improvement Fund 71 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Fund 72 Park and Facility Development Fund 73 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund 74 Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund 75 Asset Seizure Fund 76 Landscape Maintenance District Fund 77 Other Debt Service Fund: 79 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual: Public Financing Authority Fund 80 i i 11 i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 FINANCIAL SECTION (CONTINUED): Page Number Supplementary Information (Continued): Other and Major Capital Projects Funds: 81 Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual: 82 Public Financing Authority Fund 83 Capital Improvement Fund Internal Service Funds: 85 86 Combining Statement of Net Assets Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets 87 88 Combining Statement of Cash Flows STATISTICAL SECTION: Description of Statistical Section Contents 89 Financial Trends: Net Assets by Component - Last Four Fiscal Years 90 Changes in Net Assets - Last Four Fiscal Years 91 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Four Fiscal Years 92 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Four Fiscal Years 93 Revenue Capacity: Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 Direct: and Overlapping Property Tax Rates - 95 Current Fiscal Year Top 10 Property Taxpayers 96 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 97 Debt Capacity: Direct and Overlapping Debt 98 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 99 Demographic and Economic Information: Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Calendar Years 100 Principal Employers 101 CITY OF DIAMOND $AR TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 STATISTICAL SECTION (CONTINUED): Page Number Operating Information: Full -Time Equivalent City Employees by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 103 1 t lack Tanaka Mayor Pro Tem Wen P. Chang Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Zirbes Council Member ' Recycled paper January 15, 2007 City of Diamond Bar 21825 Copley Drive • Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 839-7000 • Fax (909) 861-3117 www.CityofDiamondBar.com Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Diamond Bar Diamond Bar, California It is a pleasure to submit the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Diamond Bar for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. This report consists of management's representations concerning the finances of the City. Consequently, responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City's management. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management of the City has established a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed both to protect the City's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the City's financial statements in conformance with GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the City's comprehensive framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material aspects. The City's financial statements have been audited by Diehl, Evans and Company L.L.P., a firm of certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the City for fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor concluded based upon the audit that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unqualified opinion that the City's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, were fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. The independent audit of the financial statements of the City of Diamond Bar was part of a broader, federally mandated "Single Audit" designed to meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The standards governing Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report not only on the fair presentation of the financial statements, but also on the audited City's internal controls and legal requirements involving the administration of federal awards. These reports are available in the City's separately issued Single Audit Report. GAAP requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors. PROFILE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR The City, incorporated in 1989, is located at the junction of the 57 and 60 freeways. As a result, the City of Diamond Bar is at the hub of the Los Angeles basin transportation network. A twenty-five mile radius encompasses Pasadena, downtown Los Angeles, Long Beach, Irvine and Riverside. Diamond Bar is a relatively young residential community of about 59,200, situated among the meandering hills and valleys of Brea Canyon. Many desired services can be found in Diamond Bar's shopping and business centers. Recreational opportunities within the City include more than 70 acres of developed park facilities, hiking trails, a new community center, an 18 -hole public golf course and 370 acres of undeveloped publicly owned open space. The City has operated under the council-manager form of government since incorporation. Policy making and legislative authority are vested in a five member City Council. The City Council is responsible, among other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees and task forces, and hiring both the City Manager and City Attorney. The City Manager is responsible for overseeing the day -to day operations of the City, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. The Council is elected on a non-partisan basis. Council members serve four-year staggered terms, with elections held every other year. Each December, the City Council selects a mayor and mayor pro tem from its membership. The City of Diamond Bar is a contract city and as such contracts for many of its services. This includes police services, building and safety services, engineering, road maintenance and landscape maintenance. ' The Los Angeles g es County Fire District provides fire protection, which is independent of ' the City. Funds are collected through property tax bills and are disbursed directly to the Los Angeles County Fire District by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector's Office. ' Water services for the City are provided by the Walnut Valley Water District. Refuse collection is provided by private waste collection companies. Additionally, schools are provided by both the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the Pomona Unified School District. Accordingly, none of these activities are included in this report. ECONOMIC CONDITION AND OUTLOOK ' During the last few years, the City of Diamond Bar's economy has seen a slight improvement. This fiscal year was no exception as illustrated by higher sales tax ' revenues and property tax revenues. To spite this growth, the erosion of the City's sales tax base is a major concern to the City. The City has, however, built General Fund ' reserves to fill in any gaps created by the economy or changes in State funding. A careful analysis of the FY 06-07 budget will be done mid -year to adjust anticipated revenues as well as appropriations. ' The City continues to market opportunities for business expansion and business attraction. As a result of these efforts, the City is starting to realize some of the fruit of its labor. In October 2006 the City will have the first ' opening of a major retail store since incorporation. This Target store is the anchor store for a small shopping center ' which will eventually include restaurants and other services. This project located at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive also includes a residential component consisting of town homes and single family homes. This location is considered one of the prime retail locations in ' the City. In addition, the Country Hills Town Center is being redesigned and rebuilt to include a new grocery store. In FY06-07, the City will continue to explore opportunities to expand its sales tax and ' property tax base with new development opportunities in its commercial areas and the possible annexation of land located within the City's sphere of influence. Development opportunities in the City's commercial areas include the Walnut Valley Trailer Park site; L.A. County Golf Course site; site "D"; and the K -Mart Property. The annexation plans will provide an alternative site for a golf course thus making it to ' possible commercially develop the current golf course site. The City's future economic health is being secured by building healthy reserves through fiscally conservative budgets and policies in ' addition to aggressively pursuing economic development opportunities. AWARDS The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Diamond Bar for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, with contents that conform to program standards. The CAFR must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. The City of Diamond Bar has received the Certificate of Achievement for the last eleven consecutive years (fiscal years ended 1995 through 2005 ). We believe our current report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The City of Diamond Bar has also been awarded the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers for its comprehensive annual financial report for the last eleven consecutive years. REPORTING ENTITY AND ITS SERVICES This Comprehensive Annual Financial Report includes all funds of the City. The City directly provides a limited range of services and contracts for several other services. The City's significant reliance on contracted services has the benefit of reducing expenses to the citizens of the City of Diamond Bar while simultaneously providing the City with a high degree of flexibility in responding to changing economic conditions. Contracted services include police protection, building and safety, street maintenance, park maintenance, capital improvement projects, animal control, attorney services and engineering. Staff provided services include: community development (which includes planning, economic development, building and safety management, and neighborhood improvement), public works (which includes engineering, capital projects administration, street maintenance contract management, traffic and transportation matters, engineering contract management, and solid waste contract management), community services (which includes senior services, park maintenance, recreation services, community center operation, and landscape maintenance), community relations, subsidized transit ticket sales, grant administration, financial management, and administrative management. All of these activities are included in this report. -iv- 1 Cash Management ' The City invests temporarily idle funds in accordance with the Government Code and the investment policy approved annually by the City Council. During FY05-06, most of ' the City funds were invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), which is administered by the State Treasurer's Office. In addition to LAIF, the City diversified its investment portfolio by also investing in U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise ' Securities and Money Market Mutual Fund accounts that are in accordance with the City's investment policy. The City manages all of its cash and investments on a pooled basis. Interest earnings are allocated to the various funds based on their share of cash ' and investment balances. ' Risk Management The City of Diamond Bar is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance ' Authority (CJPIA) for the purpose of pooling its general liability losses and claims with the other member agencies. The City is charged for the first $30,000 of each claim. Claims above $30,000 are shared by all the member agencies up to a maximum of $50,000,000 per occurrence. ' The City belongs to the CJPIA's Workers' Compensation Insurance Program. The administration of the workers' compensation program is similar to that of the authority's liability program. The City is charged for the first $50,000 of each claim. Costs from $50,001 to $100,000 per claim are pooled based on the member's losses under its ' retention level. Costs between $100,001 and $2,000,000 are pooled based on payroll. Costs between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000 are paid by excess insurance purchased by the CJPIA. Costs in excess of $5,000,000 are based ' pooled on payroll. Additionally, the City has all risk property insurance through The City's according to a schedule of covered property rty suority. property is currently insured adip p submitted to the Authority by the City. Total all-risk property insurance coverage is $100,000,000 per occurrence. There is a $5,000 per loss deductible. Premiums for the coverage are paid annually. ' The City has also established a self-insurance internal service fund to cover the City's share of any potential losses not covered by the CJPIA. The City Council established a ' policy of annually transferring $100,000 to the fund to create a self-insurance reserve. Policy states that when the reserve reaches $1,000,000, the ' reserves are deemed to be sufficient. No transfer was necessary this fiscal year, since the reserves reached that milestone in fiscal year 1998-99. The self-insurance reserve at June 30, 2006 was $1,210,475. i Defined Benefit Pension Plan The City has contracted with the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to provide retirement, disability, death and survivor benefits for all eligible full and part-time City employees. The pension benefit obligation varies from year to year and is computed as part of an actuarial valuation. For the three years ended June 30, 2004, 2005, and 2006 the total contribution to PERS was 12.70%, 15.06% and 11.148% respectively, of the annual covered payroll. The City's total contribution to the system was $496,247 for FY2005-06. The total contribution paid by the City included employer contributions as well as member contributions for which the City is contractually obligated to pay on behalf of its employees. Acknowledgements The preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report on a timely basis was made possible by the dedicated service of the City's Finance Department staff, and through the cooperation of the entire City staff. Each staff member has my sincere appreciation for the contributions made in the preparation of this Report. I would also like to thank our independent auditor, Diehl, Evans and Company L.L.P., for its expertise and advice in the preparation of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. In closing, without the leadership and support of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, the preparation of this Report would not have been possible. Sincerely, A_�_f DcSteo City Manager -vi- � � = M M M M M California Society of cJ`4unicipal 351nance 0fTicers Certificate of Award Outstanding Financial Reporting 2004-05 Presented to the City of Diam o n Bar is certificate is issued in recognition of meeting professional standards and criteria in reporting which reflect a high level of quality in the annual financial statements and in the underlying accounting system from which the reports were prepared. February 24, 2006 Bill Thomas, Chair Professional & Technical Standards Committee Dedicated to Excellence in Municipal Financial Management Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financia Reporting Presented to City of Diamond Bar California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2005 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. COFWE E OFp�C�P UMI S AM UWa President CDRPOOMAIroN S zy�9� SEELL �$ti drcwo Executive Director P .�. .. .� � r rr r rr, r �r ■� �r r� r� r �r ri rr r Redevelopment r ty rk - Rel luck Algn.1 ❑eel irms (ot iI Support -' lr`gilla(we Review Building & Safety - Inspacliuii' -- Plan(bolk" - r_onnart Servir ec - (.uultly Ser Ci p` City Council Public City Financing City Manager Authority Attorney Assistant I I EngineeringI I C I P City Manager Land Development Roadway Project and Engineering - fraffic Management/ Services Safety Project Inspection* Misc. Improvements Plan Check' Traffic and ransportation - Neighborhood Traffic Management Program - Regional Transportation Public Works Environmental Agency Community Services Right of Way Services Systems Y Roadway/Street Maint. Recreation Parks and - Sewer Maint. Maintenance LSpecial rojects - cunlracl Clas" - LndsclVLighting L Library -- Senile Services District Main[ Financial Reporting - Special Events - Parks Maintl Marketing - rarilily Management Improvements Relations - Conte act Classes - LA County Sheriff- - Senior Services - Special Events - Facility Management r ty rk - Rel luck Algn.1 ❑eel irms (ot iI Support -' lr`gilla(we Review Building & Safety - Inspacliuii' -- Plan(bolk" - r_onnart Servir ec - (.uultly Ser Ci p` City Council Public City Financing City Manager Authority Attorney Assistant I I EngineeringI I C I P City Manager Land Development Roadway Project and Engineering - fraffic Management/ Services Safety Project Inspection* Misc. Improvements Plan Check' Traffic and ransportation - Neighborhood Traffic Management Program - Regional Transportation Public Works Community Environmental Information Public Services Right of Way Resources Systems Y Roadway/Street Maint. THHW/E-Waste Used Oil/ Storm Drain Maint. Recycling Programs - Sewer Maint. NPDE5 Permit - Traffir Signals/ - Budget Sign Main[. Community Human Information Public Public )evelopment Finance Resources Systems Y Information Safety Accounting - Payroll Risk Mgnri Recruitment Citywide Computer Infrastructure -Public Relations -Animal 10 Irol• - Budget Benefit Admin E -Government Coordination Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Public Education Media Relations - Emergency Preparedness Financial Reporting Employee Telecommunications Marketing LA Courcy Fire" -Transit Sales Relations - LA County Sheriff- r Economic Development Business Atli action - Business Espansiun Business Retention Marketing Neighborhooc Improvement - Graffiti Removal Code Enforcement Planning General Plan Development Processing Environmental Review Community Developmenl Block Grant Tres Herinanos Business Registration 961h,-, 111,1!11IS11 Ih11: �� Organization CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ELECTED AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager Assistant City Manager City Clerk Doyle Director of: Community Services Community Development Finance Public Works Information Systems -X- Carol Herrera Robert Zirbes Jack Tanaka Wen Chang Steve Tye Linda C. Lowry David Doyle Tommye Cribbins Bob Rose Nancy Fong Linda G. Magnuson David G. Liu Ken Desforges ' DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS & CONSULTANTS ' MICHAEL R. LUDIN. CPA A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATIONS CRAIG W. SPRAKER. CPA NITIN P. PATEL. CPA ROBERT J. CALLANAN. CPA 2121 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 100 'PHILIP H. HOLTKAMP. CPA ' IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92606-4956 'THOMAS M. PERLOWSKI. CPA (949) 39 -HARVEY]. SCHROEDER. CPA •FAX (949) 399 0610 KENNETH R. AMES. CPA wWw.dieKievanhlevans.com October 19, 2006 •A PROFlSSIONAL CORPORATION INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Honorable Mayor and City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Diamond Bar, California We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Diamond Bar, California, as of and ' for the year ended June 30, 2006, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the City of Diamond Bar's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on ' our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States ' of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ' financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. ' In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Diamond Bar, California, as of June 30, 2006, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. i -1- ' OTHER OFFICES AT: 2965 ROOSEVELT STREET 613 W. VALLEY PARKWAY. SUITE 330 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-2339 ESCONDIDO. CALIFORNIA 92025-2598 (7601729-2-143 - FAX (760) 729-2234 (760) 741-3141 • FAX (760) 741-9890 In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated November 9, 2006 on our consideration of the City of Diamond Bar's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The management's discussion and analysis and the other required supplementary information identified in the accompanying table of contents are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures to the management's discussion and analysis, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of this required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the management's discussion and analysis and express no opinion on it. The budgetary comparison schedules and related note have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City of Diamond Bar's basic financial statements. The introductory section, other supplementary information and statistical section as listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The other supplementary information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The introductory section and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. V//,;" -2- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' Management's Discussion and Analysis June 30, 2006 ' As management of the City of Diamond Bar, we offer readers of the City of Diamond Bar's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City of Diamond Bar for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal. ' Financial Highlights • The total revenues from all sources equaled $24,813,660. • The total cost of all City programs equaled $21,781,805. a The assets of the City of Diamond Bar exceeded its liabilities at the close of the fiscal year by $48,919,090 (net assets). Of this amount, $29,461,178 (unrestricted net assets) may be used to ' meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. 0 As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City of Diamond Bar's governmental funds ' reported combined ending fund balances of $31,849,025, a decrease of $584,921 in comparison with the prior year. $28,264,024 of that amount is available for spending at the City's discretion. (unreserved, undesignated fund balance) ' • At the end of the current fiscal year, unreserved fund balance for the general fund was ' $25,103,444, or over one and a half the amount of general fund expenditures. Overview of the Financial Statements ' This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City of Diamond Bar's basic financial statements. The City of Diamond Bar's basic financial statements comprise three ' components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the basic financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. ' Government -wide financial statements — The government —wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City of Diamond Bar's finances, in a manner similar to a private -sector business. The statement of net assets presents information on all of the City of Diamond Bar's assets and ' liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in new assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City of Diamond Bar is improving or deteriorating. 1 ' See independent auditors' report. -3- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Overview of the Financial Statements (Continued) Government -wide financial statements (Continued) The statement of activities presents information showing how the City's net assets changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving ws. Thus, revenues rise to the chanexpenses ge occurs, reg fo )ess of the some items that will only result nof related cash c ash flows in future fiscal periods are reported in this statement (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City of Diamond Bar that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities of the City of Diamond Bar include general government, public safety, highways and streets, community development, and parks and recreation. The City of Diamond Bar currently has no business -type activities. The government -wide financial statements include not only the City of Diamond Bar itself, but also a legally separate financing authority. Although legally separate, the Diamond Bar Financing Authority is included because the City is financially accountable for it. Fund financial statements — A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City of Diamond Bar, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into two categories: governmental funds, and proprietary f Governmental Funds — Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, or fewerfinanchal resources that of the acan be spel year. lntlin� rmhe near helps to determine whether there are more future to finance the City's programs. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for govern financial mentss with �By information presented lar for governmental activities m the bo doing so, readers may better undwi erstand the long term impacts of the overnmlentalnfund financing of decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the b nges in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this revenues, expenditures, and cha comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. See independent auditors' report. -4- ' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis ' (Continued) June 30, 2006 ' Overview of the Financial Statements (Continued) ' Fund financial statements (Continued) ' Governmental Funds (Continued) — The City of Diamond Bar adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the general fund to demonstrate compliance with this budget. Proprietary Funds — The type of proprietary funds that the City maintains are internal service funds that are used to allocate costs internally among the various functions of the City. The City of Diamond Bar uses these funds to account for its liability insurance costs and vehicle and computer replacement costs. Because these services predominantly benefit governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included within governmental activities within the government -wide financial ' statements. Notes to the Basic Financial Statements — The notes provide additional information that is essential to ' a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. Other Information — In addition to the basic financial statements and ' accompanying notes, this report also presents certain required supplementary information concerning the City's budgetary control and accounting and expenditures in excess of appropriations. ' Government -wide Financial Analysis ' As mentioned earlier, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of the City's financial position. The City of Diamond Bar's assets exceeded liabilities by $48,919,090 at the close of 2006 (see Table 1). ' Included in the net assets of the City of Diamond Bar is its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings, machinery, construction in progress and equipment), less the related outstanding debt used ' to acquire those assets. The City of Diamond Bar uses these capital assets to provide services to its citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources ' needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. i I See independent auditors' report. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Government -wide Financial Analysis (Continued) Table I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR'S Statement of Net Assets Governmental Activities 2006 2005 Current and other assets $39,755,482 $39,547,890 Capital assets 27,421,565 23,729,680 Total Assets 67,177,047 63,277,570 Long-term debt outstanding Other Liabilities Total Liabilities Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of debt Restricted Unrestricted Total Net Assets 13, 350, 051 13,558,447 4,907,906 3,587,323 18,257, 957 17,145,770 14, 593,935 10,692,694 4,863,977 5,419,372 29,461,178 ' 30,019,734 $48,919,090 $46,131,800 reason r this growth The City's Net Assets in apitalyear as ets including the pur31,855 or chase of 11%. Theand for economicode development is due a higher roves p purposes and significant infrastructure improvements. The City's total revenues were $24.8 million, while the total cost of all programs and $21.8 million. Revenues tlc10.10% higher oso ar increases in most of threvenueategories.The following are highlights of some differences: • Charges for services increased this year due to several factors. The building development fees were higher as a result of the construction of a major housing development and a new Target Department store. Another factor was the increased participation in the City's discounted transit pass program. • ntributions increased as a result of the City obtaining and using Operating grants and co various grants to augment City resources in the financing of various capital improvements. • The significant increase in property tax revenue and offsetting decrease in Motor Vehicle in Lieu revenue is due to the change in the allocation of funds to the City by the State. Some of the revenue that had previously been received from the State in the form of Motor Vehicle in Lieu revenue has been replaced with Property Tax Revenues. In addition property values have increased resulting in an increase in the property tax base. • Sales tax and franchise taxes were all higher this year due to a growing economy. • ignificantly due to rising interest rates and the Investment Income has increased s nt portfolio diversification of the City's investme. This year the City started investing some of its funds in longer term securities resulting in a higher investment yield (see note 2). services was There were of the major See independent auditors' report. -6- i i i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Government -wide Financial Analysis (Continued) Table 2 City of Diamond Bar's Changes in Net Assets Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General Revenues Property taxes Transient occupancy taxes Sales Taxes Property Taxes in Lieu of Sales Taxes Franchise Taxes Motor vehicle in lieu Property transfer tax Othertaxes Investment Income Other Total revenues Expenses: General Government Public Safety Highways and Streets Community Development Parks, Recreation and Culture Interest on long-term debt Total expenses Change in net assets Net assets - Beginning of year Net assets - End of year 2006 2005 $4,818,125 $4,129,802 5,281,308 4,040,785 1,150 6,769,553 3,155,723 718,889 717,879 2,964,877 2,645,096 984,472 863,245 996,567 941,319 413,230 4,386,800 416,423 413,247 35,522 35,283 1,051,922 532,091 361,622 676,292 24,813,660 22,537,562 4,203,123 3,997,319 5,418,005 4,969,183 5,240,568 4,622,014 2,759,718 1,050,025 3,737,071 3,814,887 423,320 270,735 21,781,805 18,724,163 3,031,855 3,813,399 45,887,235 42,073,836 $48,919,090 $45,887,235 Expenditures were higher (16.33%) this fiscal year as well. The increase is primarily due to increased services to the community. • General Government was higher this year due primarily to changes made in the City's Information Technology Division. This division has been responsible for the implementation of several new computer systems this year. Another factor in the increase in General Government is due to the increased cost of the lease paid to the Public Financing Authority for the Diamond Bar Center. This lease amount is based on the debt service due on the variable rate lease revenue bonds that were issued to build the Center. Since interest rates have been rising, so has this cost. See independent auditors' report. -7- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Government -wide Financial Analysis (Continued) Changes in Net Assets (Continued) Public Safety increased due to the rising cost of the sheriff's contract with the County. There were overall contract rate increases. Another factor in this increase was due to the fact that in the previous fiscal year, the City had one contracted position which remained vacant for most of the year. The Highways and Streets category increased due to rising street maintenance costs. In addition during the year the lighted street name signs at most of the major intersections were replaced. Community Development increased significantly due to the emphasis the City has placed on Economic Development. This year the City purchased land that will be used in the future for Economic Development purposes. As mentioned earlier rising .interest rates on the outstanding variable rate lease revenue bonds caused an increase in interest and fiscal charges. Financial Analysis of the City's Funds As noted earlier the City of Diamond Bar uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. ,fundis to Governmental funds. The focus of the Cittyof d balances of spendable governmresourceental Such information is information on near-term inflows, outflows, useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unreserved fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a City's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Diamond Bar's governmental funds reported combined endine prior g fund balances of $31,849,025�e decrease of reserved to liquidate ontrac84,291 in ots1 and purchasarison with e orders year. Of this amount, there is $2,082,577 outstanding at the end of the year. The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City of Diamond Atthe en the hotal fund e current fiscal year, the unreserved fund balance of the general fund w $25,103,444, balance reached $26,413,616. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unreserved fund balance and total fund balce to while totalfundtal fund rbalance represent fund fund balance represents 154.4% of total general expenditures, 162.4% of the same amount. See independent auditors' report. -8- '1 ' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Financial Analysis of the City's Funds (Continued) ' Governmental funds (Continued). Overall the fund balance of the Cit of Diamond Bar's ar' s general fund increased by $477,977 during the current year. Since the City's incorporation, the City has been fiscally conservative contributing to healthy fund balance reserves. Other factors contributing to this growth are as follows: ' • Property tax revenue increased due the unprecedented rise in property values within the Southern California region and a favorable real estate market. ' • Some of the revenues received from the State for Motor Vehicle in Lieu fees are now based on an allocation of property taxes based on property values. Previously it had been allocated based on population. As a result since the City's property values have increased so has this ' revenue source. • Sales tax increased as a result of a growing economy and the dramatic increase in fuel prices ' since some of the City's largest sales tax producers are gas stations. • There was dramatic increase in building related fees. This is due to some of the City's ' economic development activities. This year saw the development of a new shopping area which includes a new Target store, a major housing development, Brookstone Homes and the ' rebuilding of the Country Hills Town Center shopping center. • Rents and Concessions continued to rise due to the popularity of the City's park facilities ' including the Diamond Bar Center. 9 Investment income from higher interest rates and higher cash balances in the General Fund ' contributed to the growth of the General Fund as well. General Fund Budgetary Highlights iAlthough original revenue budget projections were increased during the year b 10.1% actual revenues exceeded expectations by another 9.57%. In all but one category actual revenues exceeded ' expectations. The General Fund taxes category include property taxes, sales tax, franchise tax and property transfer ' tax. These revenues exceeded expectations by $947,058. The variance between the amount budgeted and the amount received is due to the fact that the City has traditionally budgeted revenues conservatively without building a lot of growth into the budget. This along with the economic growth caused the dramatic difference between the budget and actual numbers. The fiscal year 2006-07 budget has been created to reflect more realistic revenue projections. See independent auditors' report. -9- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 General Fund Budgetary Highlights (Continued) The City received a federal grant which had not been budursement for geted. ThisCenterWOrant lt was questionable as s reimb some of the expenditures related to the construction of the Diamond Bar g so therefore it was not budgeted prior to its receipt. to when and if the City would receive the fundin The investment income revenue estimate was much higher than anticipated due to higher investment yields and a slight change in investment strategy. Other revenues exceeded expectations partially due to the unanticipated receipt of a settlement from an audit of the Cable TV franchisee. the General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2005-06 were anticipated t263 047 be jog $2, 20,615 less 3,662 according othan amended budget numbers. The actual expenditures equaled $ anticipated. Most of the expenditure categories came s in orporated worst casenscenariose of s The City also is due to the creation of a conservative budget which in some are experienced a turnover in several staff positions reprojects budgeted ted had to be postponed unsulting in salary savings in several til ala later date. In a result of this turn over in staff many of ly in fiscal some cases the projects were encumbered at the n encumbrances f the equaled $491 061 adtghe end of the year 2006-07. Contract commitments in the form fiscal year. Capital Asset and Debt Administration its goernntal es Capital assets -The City of Diamond Bar's investmentaccumulated depredation) V Thisinvestmentlm as of June 30, 2006 amounts to $27,421,565 net of capital assets includes land, buildings andct onrineprogress.urni he total increase in theeCity's equipment, some infrastructure and construprogress. investment in capital assets was 15.56% from the previous year (see Table 3). At this time, the City has not valued its infrastructure and therefore only the infrastructure improvements constructed since fiscal year 2002-2003 have been included at this time. As mentioned in the discussion of the Economic Development expenditures, the City purchased land this fiscal year and as a result the City's investment in land increased by $953,725. The decrease in Furniture and Fixtures was due to the deletion of excess office furniture which was surplused. See independent auditors' report. - 10- ' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Capital Asset and Debt bt Adnunistration (Continued) Capital assets (Continued) - The increase in Vehicles and Equipment is primarily a result of the purchase of three new trucks and the activities of the Information Technology Division. The trucks were purchased to replace two of the aging fleet and to provide a vehicle for a new road maintenance staff member. The Information Technology equipment increased as well due to the replacement or purchases of new computer servers. Table 3 City of Diamond Bar Capital Assets (net of depreciation) ' Land 2006 2005 $6,206,190 $5,252,465 Buildings and Improvements 15,233,102 15,440,854 Furniture and Fixtures Vehicles & Equipment 11,875 539,624 12,275 438,420 Infrastructure 2,483,021 1,686,888 ' Construction in Progress 2,947,753 $27,421,565 898,778 $23,7299680 i i Capitalized infrastructure increased due to the completion of five street related projects. These included: • A traffic signal located at Golden Springs Drive and Adel/Hic, ob. • A new ADA accessible sidewalk on Diamond Bar Boulevard between the 60 freeway and Solitaire Drive. • Parkway and median improvements on Pathfinder Road near Evergreen Springs Road. • Parkway and median improvements on Brea Canyon Road near Gerndal Street and Golden Springs Drive and Adel Avenue. • Parkway and median improvements on Diamond Bar Blvd south of Mountain Laurel. Construction in progress at the end of the year included twenty projects in various stages of construction. There were four park improvement projects in progress totaling $113,633. There was one major road construction project (Grand Ave — Beautification and Betterment Phase I) amounting to $2,137,502. There were a variety of traffic signal improvements and parkway improvements either in the design phase or under construction at the end of the year. These projects totaled $696,618 at the end of the year. Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in note 4. See independent auditors' report. - 11 - CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) June 30, 2006 Capital Asset and Debt Administration (Continued) Long-term debt — At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Diamond Bar's total long-term debt equaled $13,686,974. The following table shows the breakdown of the debt outstanding. Table 4 City of Diamond Bar Outstanding Long Term Debt at Year-end Variable Rate Lease Revenue Bonds (backed by the Public Financing $ 13,520,000 Authority) Unamoritzed Bond Discount (123,795) Compensated Absences (backed by 290,769 the City) $ 13,686,974 Additional information on the City's long-term debt can be found in Note 5. Economic Factors and Next Year's Budgets and Rates While the City maintains a diverse and upscale housing stock, the City's economy is equally dependent on commercial and retail revenues. The City's concentration on maintaining and attracting new business clientele is of utmost importance. The City's 2006-2007 budget is a fiscally conservative budget. Anticipated revenues in the General ly 6% which is a reflection of continued growth in the economy. Fund have increased by approximate ave only increased to cover the ng At the same time General Fund appropriations hby use c some general fund balance increases in the region. The City has made a conscientious decision t purposes. As a result, the FY07 budget includes an appropriation reserves for economic developmen for economic development. It is an that these efforts will continue to be rewarded in the near future with the development of several new retail spaces. Contacting the City's Financial Management This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, customers, and creditors with a general overview of the City of Diamond Bar's finances and to show the City's accountability for the money it receives. if you have questions about this report or need additional financial information, ment, at the City of Diamond Bar, 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond contact the City's Finance Depart Bar, California 91765. See independent auditors' report. -12- i ' BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 11 1 1 -13- THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY -14- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS June 30, 2006 ASSETS: Cash and investments (Note 2) Accounts receivable Interest receivable Due from other governments Due from employees Notes receivable Deposits Deferred charges Restricted assets: Cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 2) Capital assets, not depreciated (Note 4) Capital assets, depreciated, net (Note 4) TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES: Accounts payable Accrued payroll Interest payable Deposits payable Retentions payable Due to other governments Advance from other governments Noncurrent liabilities (Note 5): Due within one year Due in more than one year TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for. Debt service Capital projects Specific programs Unrestricted TOTAL NET ASSETS See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -15- Governmental Activities $ 35,178,211 342,107 362,641 2,579,345 3,538 137,595 64,000 568,575 519,470 9,153,943 18,267,622 67,177,047 2,603,475 81,437 43,323 1,092,108 251,689 361,356 137,595 336,923 13,350,051 18,257,957 14,593,935 243,697 3,323,474 1,296,806 29,461,178 $ 48,919,090 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For the year ended June 30, 2006 General revenues: Taxes: 6,769,553 Property taxes 718,889 Transient occupancy taxes Net (Expense) Sales taxes 984,472 Property taxes in lieu of sales taxes 996,567 Franchise taxes Revenue and Property transfer tax 35,522 Other taxes 413,230 Unrestricted motor vehicle in lieu Changes in Investment income 361,622 Other revenue Program Revenues Net Assets Total general revenues Charges g Operating Grants and Capital Grants and Governmental NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, 45,887,235 for services Contributions Contributions Activities Functions/programs _ Ex nses �— $ (3,490,189) Governmental activities: $ 4,203,123 $272 707, $ 5,662 _ $ " (3,975,494) General government 5,418,005 1,277,170 165,341 - 208,308 Public safety 5,240,568 1,555,993 3.892,883 1,150 (1,966,636) Highways and streets 2,759,718 16,841 775,091 Community development _ (2,033,891) Parks, recreation 3,737,071 1,260,849 442,331 (423,320) and culture Interest on long-term debt interest- 20 r = - �---- --------- Total governmental $ 4$ $ 5 281 308 $ 1,150_ (11,681,222) activities $ 21 781,805 ,125 --�— General revenues: Taxes: 6,769,553 Property taxes 718,889 Transient occupancy taxes 2,964,877 Sales taxes 984,472 Property taxes in lieu of sales taxes 996,567 Franchise taxes 416,423 Property transfer tax 35,522 Other taxes 413,230 Unrestricted motor vehicle in lieu 1,051,922 Investment income 361,622 Other revenue 14,713,077 Total general revenues 3,031,855 Change in net assets NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, 45,887,235 AS RESTATED (NOTE 12) $ 48,919,090 NET ASSETS - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -16- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS ' GENERAL FUND The General Fund has been classified as a major fund and is used to account for resources traditionally ' associated with government, which are not legally or by sound financial management to be accounted for in another fund. SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ' The Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by law or administrative action for a specified purpose. The following Special Revenue Fund has been classified as a major fund in the accompanying financial statements: Proposition A Transit Fund - This fund is used to account for the receipt and expenditure of the City's share of the 1/2 cent sales tax levied in Los Angeles County for local transit purposes. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for the acquisition and construction of capital ital J P facilities. The following Capital Projects Fund has been classified as a major fund in the ' accompanying financial statements: ' Capital Improvement Fund - This fund is used to account for the costs of constructing street improvements, park improvements and other public improvements not normally included within the other Capital Projects funds. Financing is provided by developer fees and interfund transfers from the ' Special Revenue Funds and the General Fund. J -17- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTALFUNDS June 30, 2006 ASSETS ASSETS: Cash and investments Cash and investments with fiscal agent Accounts receivable Interest receivable Due from other funds (Note 3) Due from employees Due from other governments Deposits Notes receivable TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES: Accounts payable Accrued payroll Deposits payable Due to other funds (Note 3) Deferred revenue Retentions payable Advances from other governments TOTAL LIABILITIES FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT): Reserved for: Encumbrances Deposits Improvements Bond retirement Debt service Unreserved, Reported in: General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds TOTAL FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT) TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Special Capital Revenue Fund Projects Fund General Prop A Transit Capital Fund Fund Improvement $ 27,191,624 $ 1,056,423 $ - 40,619 - 191,831 292,102 16 - 362,641 - 549,832 - 323,299 3,538 - - 1,237,332 - 608,089 64,000 - - $ 29,741,688 $ 1,056,439 $ 1,123,219 $ 1,839,155 $ 116,385 $ 512,676 75,884 1,824 - 1,092,108 - - - 517,760 320,925 - 496,416 - - 251,689 3,328,072 11.8,209 1,778,541 491,061 - 1,560,758 64,000 - - 2,207 - 396,293 752,904 - 25,103,444 - 938,230 - _ - (2,612,373) 26,413,616 938,230 (655,322) $ 29,741,688 $ 1,056,439 $ 1,123,219 See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. - is- 1I t Other Total Governmental Governmental Funds Funds $ 5,096,866 $ 33,344,913 287,020 519,470 49,989 342,107 - 362,641 - 873,131 - 3,538 733,924 2,579,345 - 64,000 137,595 137,595 $ 6,305,394 $ 38,226,740 $ 135,259 $ 2,603,475 3,729 81,437 - 1,092,108 355,371 873,131 5201939 1,338,280 - 251,689 137,595 137,595 1,152,893 6,377,715 30,758 2,082,577 - 64,000 398,500 - 752,904 287,020 287,020 - 25,103,444 4,834,723 5,772,953 (2,612,373) 5,152,501 31, 849,025 $ 6,305,394 $ 38,226,740 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY -20- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET TO THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS June 30, 2006 i t See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -21- Fund balances for governmental funds $ 31,849,025 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Assets are different because: ' Capital assets, net of depreciation, have not been included as financial resources in governmental fund activity. 27,335,199 Long-term liabilities applicable to the City governmental activities are not due and payable in the current period and accordingly are not reported as fund liabilities. Also, bond issuance costs do not provide current financial resources and are not reported in the governmental funds. All liabilities, both current and long-term, are reported in ' the Statement of Net Assets. Balances at June 30, 2006 are: Bonds payable $ (13,520,000) ' Deferred charges for issuance costs 568,575 Bond discount 123,795 Compensated absences (290,769) (13,118,399) Accrued interest payable from the current portion of interest due on bonds payable has not been reported in the governmental funds. (43,323) ' Long-term assets that are not available for current use. Amounts are recorded as deferred revenue under the modified accrual basis of accounting. 1,338,280 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as equipment management, to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of ' the internal service funds must be added to the Statement of Net Assets. 1,558,308 Net assets of governmental activities $ 48,919,090 i t See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -21- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For the year ended June 30, 2006 EXPENDITURES: Current: General government Public safety Highways and streets Parks, recreation and culture Community development Capital outlay Debt service: Principal Interest and fiscal charges TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfers in Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 3,551,659 - - 5,395,998 - 2,439,740 1,634,577 - 2,613,834 - - 2,261,816 - - 5,320,597 16,263,047 1,634,577 5,320,597 2,431,984 19,294 (5,077,569) 1,224,783 - 4,598,518 (3,178,790) - - (1,954,007) - 4,598,518 477,977 19,294 (479,051) FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT) - BEGINNING OF YEAR 25,935,639 918,936 (176,271) FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR $ 26,413,616 $ 938,230 $ (655,322) See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -22- Special Capital Revenue Fund Projects Fund General Prop A Transit Capital Fund Fund Improvement REVENUES: $ 9,508,757 $ - $ - Taxes - - Special assessments 4,449,031 959,51.8 241,878 Intergovernmental revenue - 659,218 - Charges for services 589,922 - Fines and forfeitures 2,389,149 - - Licenses, permits and fees 985,531 35,135 1,150 Investment income 772,641 - - Other revenues 18,695,031 1,653,871 243,028 TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: General government Public safety Highways and streets Parks, recreation and culture Community development Capital outlay Debt service: Principal Interest and fiscal charges TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfers in Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 3,551,659 - - 5,395,998 - 2,439,740 1,634,577 - 2,613,834 - - 2,261,816 - - 5,320,597 16,263,047 1,634,577 5,320,597 2,431,984 19,294 (5,077,569) 1,224,783 - 4,598,518 (3,178,790) - - (1,954,007) - 4,598,518 477,977 19,294 (479,051) FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT) - BEGINNING OF YEAR 25,935,639 918,936 (176,271) FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR $ 26,413,616 $ 938,230 $ (655,322) See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -22- � I Other Total Governmental Governmental Funds Funds $ - $ 9,508,757 504,908 504,908 3,170,714 8,821,141 211,096 870,314 - 589,922 - 2,389,149 228,754 1,250,570 19,575 792,216 4,135,047 24,726,977 - 3,551,659 8,261 5,404,259 695,180 4,769,497 - 2,613,834 486,723 2,748,539 - 5,320,597 235,000 235,000 404,075 404,075 1,829,239 25,047,460 2,305,808 (320,483) 646,222 6,469,523 (3,555,171) (6,733,961) (2,908,949) (264,438) (603,141) (584,921) 5,755,642 32,433,946 $ 5,152,501 $ 31,849,025 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For the year ended June 30, 2006 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: $ (584,921) Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over the estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which depreciation exceeded capital expense in the current period: $ 4,941,840 Capital expenditures (1,307,113) 3,634,727 Depreciation expense The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital assets (i.e. sales, trade-ins and donations) is to decrease net assets. The issuance of long term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts and similar items when the debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the Statement of Activities, These amounts are the net effect. of these differences in the treatment of long-term debt and related items: Principal payment Amortization of bond discount Amortization of issuance costs Compensated absences Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds: Interest expense Some revenues reported in the Statement of Activities are not considered to be available to finance current expenditures and therefore are not reported as revenues in the governmental funds Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as self-insurance, equipment management, and computer management, to individual funds. The net revenues (expenses) of the internal service funds is reported with governmental activities. Change in net assets of govemmental activities See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -24- 235,000 (4,585) (21,059) (40,528) (14,819) 168,828 (14,660) 28,800 (186,100) $ 3,031,855 CTI'Y OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS PROPRIETARY FUNDS June 30, 2006 Internal Service ASSETS Funds CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and investments NONCURRENT ASSETS: Capital assets: Machinery and equipment Less accumulated depreciation TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS CURRENT LIABILITIES: Due to other governments NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets Unrestricted TOTAL NET ASSETS See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -25- $ 1,833,298 188,613 (1.02,247) 86,366 1,919,664 361,356 86,366 1,471,942 $ 1,558,308 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For the year ended June 30, 2006 Internal Service Funds OPERATING EXPENSES: $ 488,019 Insurance premiums 20,141 Depreciation 508,160 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (508,160) OPERATING LOSS NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): (261) Loss on disposal of capital asset 57,883 Investment income �— TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) 57,622 (450,538) LOSS BEFORE TRANSFERS 264,438 TRANSFERS IN (1.86,100) CHANGE IN NET ASSETS TOTAL NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, AS RESTATED 1,744,408 $ 1,558,308 TOTAL NET ASSETS - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -26- 1 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Insurance deposits Insurance payments NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPTTAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Transfers from other funds NET CASH PROVIDED BY NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of capital assets NET CASH USED BY CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES ' CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Investment income ' NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS wCASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING LOSS TO NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used by operating activities: Depreciation Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivables ' Increase (decrease) in due to other governments TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -27- Internal Service Funds $ 48,148 (211,752) (163,604) 264,438 264,438 (92,379) (92,379) 57,883 57,883 66,338 1,766,960 $ 1,833,298 $ (508,160) 20,141 48,148 276,267 344,556 $ _(l 63,604) ' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For the year ended June 30, 2006 1 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Insurance deposits Insurance payments NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPTTAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Transfers from other funds NET CASH PROVIDED BY NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of capital assets NET CASH USED BY CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES ' CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Investment income ' NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS wCASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING LOSS TO NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used by operating activities: Depreciation Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivables ' Increase (decrease) in due to other governments TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements. -27- Internal Service Funds $ 48,148 (211,752) (163,604) 264,438 264,438 (92,379) (92,379) 57,883 57,883 66,338 1,766,960 $ 1,833,298 $ (508,160) 20,141 48,148 276,267 344,556 $ _(l 63,604) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS t J 7 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2006 REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: a. Description of Reporting Entity: The City of Diamond Bar (the City) was incorporated April 18, 1989 as a "General Law" City governed by an elected five -member city council. As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial statements present the City of Diamond Bar (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationship with the City. These entities are legally separate from each other. However, the City of Diamond Bar's elected officials have a continuing full or partial accountability for fiscal matters of the other entities. The financial reporting entity consists of: (1) the City (2) organizations for which the City is financially accountable; and, (3) organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the City are such that exclusion would cause the City's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. An organization is fiscally dependent on the primary government if it is unable to adopt its budget, levy taxes or set rates or charges, or issue bonded debt without approval by the primary government. In a blended presentation, a component unit's balances and transactions are reported in a manner similar to the balances and transactions of the City. Component units are presented on a blended basis when the component unit's governing body is substantially the same as the City's or the component unit provides services almost entirely to the City. Blended Component Units: The Diamond Bar Community Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) was established February 6, 1996, pursuant to the State of California Health and Safety Code, Section 33000, entitled "Community Redevelopment Law". Although it is a legally separate entity from the City, the Agency is reported as if it were part of the City because of its purpose to prepare and execute plans for improvement, rehabilitation and redevelopment of blighted areas within the territorial limits of the City. According to the California Supreme Court's decision on August 9, 2000, the Agency's Redevelopment Plan was deemed invalid. No activities occurred during the year ended June 30, 2006. Accordingly, no financial statements of the Agency were issued. The Diamond Bar Public Financin_g Authority (the Authority) was formed on November 19, 2002. The purpose of the Authority is to issue debt to finance public improvements and other capital purchases for the City and Agency. The activity of the Authority is reported in debt service and capital projects funds. See independent auditors' report. -28- i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 1. REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): b. Government -Wide and Fund Financial Statements: The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of changes in net assets) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. ' Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The City has no business -type activities. 7 L i The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and proprietary funds. Major individual governmental funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. c. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation: The basic financial statements of the City are composed of the following: • Government -wide financial statements • Fund financial statements • Notes to basic financial statements Financial reporting for the government -wide financial statements is based upon all GASB pronouncements, as well as the FASB Statements and Interpretations, APB Opinions, and Accounting Research Bulletins that were issued on or before November 30, 1989 that do not conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements. FASB pronouncements issued after November 30, 1989 are not followed in preparation of the accompanying financial statements. I See independent auditors' report. -29- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): c. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued): The government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Under the economic resources measurement focus, all assets and liabilities (current and long-term) are reported. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the fiscal year, which the taxes are levied. Revenue from grants, entitlements, and donations is recognized in the fiscal year in which all the eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City's internal service funds are charges to customers for services. Operating expenses for the proprietary funds include the cost of services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the current financial resources measurement focus, generally only current assets and liabilities are reported in the governmental funds. Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the government considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on general long-term liabilities, claims and judgments, and compensated absences which are recognized as expenditures only when payment is due. See independent auditors' report. - -30- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 ' 1. REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): ic. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued): ' Property taxes, taxpayer -assessed taxes, such as sales taxes, gas taxes, and transient occupancy taxes, and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the government. The accounts of the City are organized and operated on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts, established for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions or limitations. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are combined in a fund, expenses are considered to be paid first from restricted resources, and then from unrestricted resources. d. Fund Classifications: The City reports the following major governmental funds: The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and is used to account for all revenues and expenditures of the City not legally restricted as to use. A broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund including City Manager, City Attorney, Finance, City Clerk, Public Works, Building and Safety, and Parks and Recreation. Proposition A Transit Special Revenue Fund - This fund is used to account for the receipt and expenditure of the City's share of the %2 cent sales tax levied in Los Angeles County for local transit purposes. The Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund is used to account for the costs of constructing ' street improvements, park improvements and other public improvements not normally included within the other Capital Projects funds. Financing is provided by developer fees and interfund transfers from the Special Revenue Funds and the General Fund. See independent auditors' report. -31- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 1. REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): d. Fund Classifications (Continued): The City's fund structure also includes the following fund types: GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by law or administrative action for a specified purpose. Debt Service Fund is used primarily to account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of principal and interest on long-term liabilities of the City. Capital Projects Fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Special Revenue Funds). PROPRIETARY FUNDS Internal Service Funds have been established to finance and account for goods and services provided by one City department to other City departments or agencies. These activities include self-insurance, equipment and computer maintenance. e. Investments: For financial reporting purposes, investments are stated at fair value. Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as investment income reported for that fiscal year. Investment income includes interest earnings, changes in fair value, and any gains or losses realized upon the liquidation or sale of investments. The City pools cash and investments of all funds, except for assets held by fiscal agents. Each fund's share in this pool is displayed in the accompanying financial statements as cash and investments. Investment income earned by the pooled investments is allocated to the various funds based on each fund's average cash and investment balances. See independent auditors' report. -32- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) ' June 30, 2006 ' 1. REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): ' f. Cash and Cash Equivalents: For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash or so near their maturity (an original maturity date of three months or less from the date of ' purchase) that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Cash and cash equivalents also represent the proprietary funds' share in the cash and investment pool of the City. All cash and investments of the proprietary (internal service) funds ' are pooled with the City's pooled cash and investments and are therefore considered cash equivalents for purposes of the statement of cash flows. ig. Capital Assets: Capital assets (including infrastructure) are recorded at cost where historical records are ' available and at an estimated original cost where no historical records exist. Contributed capital assets are valued at their estimated fair market value at the date of contribution. Capital asset purchases (other than infrastructure) in excess of $1,500 are capitalized if they have an ' expected useful life of three years or more. Capital assets include additions to public domain (infrastructure), certain improvements including roads, streets, sidewalks, medians and storm drains within the City. Public domain assets acquired prior to July 1, 2002 have not been included in the accompanying financial statements. The City expects to value and record all infrastructure asset data in its entirety by the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. Capital assets used in operations are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method in the Government -wide and Proprietary Fund Financial Statements. Depreciation is charged as an expense against operations and accumulated depreciation is reported on the respective balance sheet. The lives used for depreciation purposes of each capital asset class are: Buildings and improvements 10 - 20 years Furniture and fixtures 3 - 5 years Vehicles and equipment 5 years ' Infrastructure 10 - 50 years See independent auditors' report. -33- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): h. Encumbrances: Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed as an extension of formal budgetary control in the governmental funds. Encumbrances outstanding at year-end do not constitute expenditures or liabilities, but are reported as reservations of fund balance. i. Compensated Absences: Vacation and sick leave time begin to accumulate as of the first day of employment to a maximum of 160 hours. Employees who accumulate sick leave in excess of 160 hours are paid for the excess annually at one half the employee's current wage rate. A liability is recorded for unused vacation and similar compensatory leave balances since the employees' entitlement to these balances are attributable to services already rendered and it is probable that virtually all of these balances will be liquidated by either paid time off or payments upon termination or retirement. A liability is recorded for unused sick leave balances only to the extent that it's probable that the unused balances will result in termination payments. This is estimated by including in the liability the unused balances of employees currently entitled to receive termination payments, as well as those who are expected to become eligible to receive termination benefits as a result of continuing their employment with the City. If an employee terminates with a minimum of one year of service, the employee is entitled to receive 10% of the value of his unused sick leave. The percentage increases to 50% for two to three years of service and 100% of the value of his unused sick leave upon the completion of more than three years of continuous employment. j. Deferred Charges: Deferred charges represent capitalized costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt. These costs are amortized over the life of the debt on a straight-line basis. See independent auditors' report. -34- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 1. REPORTING ENTITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): k. Property Taxes: Under California law, property taxes are assessed and collected by the counties up to 1 % of assessed value, plus other increases approved by the voters. The property taxes go into a pool, and are then allocated to the cities based on complex formulas. Accordingly, the City accrues ' only those taxes which are received from the County within 60 days after year end. Property taxes are assessed and collected each fiscal year according to the following property tax calendar: Lien date January 1 ' Levy date July 1 ' Due dates November 1 - 1St installment February 1 - 2"d installment ' Collection dates December 10 - 1St installment April 10 - 2nd installment Delinquent dates December 11 - 1St installment April 11 - 2nd installment t 1. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. See independent auditors' report. -35- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS: Cash and Investments: Cash and investments at June 30, 2006 consisted of the following: Statement of Net Assets: Cash and investments $ 35,178,211 Cash and investments with fiscal agents 519,470 S 35.697.681 Cash and investments held by the City at June 30, 2006 consisted of the following: Imprest cash on hand $ 1,500 Demand deposits (overdraft) (401,279) Escrow deposits 232,450 Investments: U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities 5,946,100 Repurchase agreements 486,718 Local agency investment fund 29,145,172 Held by Bond Trustee: Cash 285,163 Money Market Mutual Funds 1,857 $ 35.697.681 See independent auditors' report. -36- 1 i t CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED): Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the Citv's Investment Policv: The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code (or the City's investment policy, where more restrictive). The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code (or the City's investment policy, where more restrictive) that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. Authorized Investment Type United States (U.S.) Treasury Obligations U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities Banker's Acceptances Time Certificate of Deposits Commercial Paper Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Money Market Mutual Funds Repurchase Agreements Medium -Term Corporate Notes (1) 5 years 30% None Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None $ 40,000,000 * - Excluding amounts held by bond trustee that are not subject to California Government Code restrictions. (1) Notes must be rated "A" or better. N/A - Not Applicable See independent auditors' report. Maximum Maximum Maximum Percentage Investment Maturity of Portfolio* in One Issuer 5 years None None 5 years 20% None 180 days 40% 30% 5 years None None 270 days 25% 10% 5 years 30% None N/A 15% None 1 year None None Medium -Term Corporate Notes (1) 5 years 30% None Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None $ 40,000,000 * - Excluding amounts held by bond trustee that are not subject to California Government Code restrictions. (1) Notes must be rated "A" or better. N/A - Not Applicable See independent auditors' report. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED): Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements: Investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee are governed by provisions of the debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for investments held by bond trustee. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk: Maximum Percentage/ Amount Allowed None 10% None None None None None Equal to six months of principal and interest on the bonds Maximum Investment in One Issuer None None None None None None None None Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. See independent auditors' report. -38- Maximum Authorized Investment Type Maturity U.S. Treasury Obligations None U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities None Banker's Acceptances 1 year Time Certificate of Deposits None Local Agency Investment Fund None Money Market Funds None Repurchase Obligations Tax Exempt 30 days Taxable Government Money Market Portfolios None Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk: Maximum Percentage/ Amount Allowed None 10% None None None None None Equal to six months of principal and interest on the bonds Maximum Investment in One Issuer None None None None None None None None Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. See independent auditors' report. -38- t CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED): Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk (Continued): Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City's investments (including investments held by bond trustee) to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City's investments by maturity: Remaining Maturity (in Months) 12 Months 13-24 25-60 Investment Type or Less Months Months Total U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities Repurchase Agreements Local Agency Investment Fund Held by Bond Trustee: Money Marker Mutual Funds Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk: $ 2,978,500 $ 2,967,600 $ - $ 5,946,100 486,718 - - 486,718 29,145,172 - - 29,145,172 1.857 1,857 $ 32.612.247 $ 2.967.600 5 - $ 35.579.847 Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the City's investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating, as reported by Standard and Poor's, as of year end for each investment type: Investment Tvoe U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities Repurchase Agreements Local Agency Investment Fund Held by Bond Trustee: Money Market Mutual Funds Total Total Minimum as of Legal June 30, 2006 Rating__ $ 5,946,100 AAA 486,718 N/A N/A - Not Applicable See independent auditors' report. 29,145,172 N/A 1,857 A 35.579.847 -39- Not AAA Rated $ 5,946,100 $ - - 486,718 1,857 5,947,957 29,145,172 eWININIFEWALARMWc AWAAA CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED): Disclosures Relating to Custodial Credit Risk: Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. The City does not accept 150% of the secured public totals. At June 30, 2006, the City deposits (bank balances) were insured by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation up to $100,000 and the remaining balances were collateralized under California Law. The cash and investments held by Bond Trustee are uninsured and uncollateralized. Investment in State Investment Pool: The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the City's pro -rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. See independent auditors' report. -40- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ' NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 ' 3. INTERFUND RECEIVABLES PAYABLES AND TRANSFERS: ' The composition of interfund balances as of June 30, 2006, is as follows: Due To/From Other Funds: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount General Fund Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund $ 517,760 Other Governmental Funds 32,072 Capital Improvement Other Governmental Funds 323,299 Capital Projects Fund $ 873.131 The amounts loaned from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund and Other Governmental Funds are to provide a short-term loan to fund temporary cash shortfalls. The amounts loaned from the Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund to Other Governmental Funds are to provide a short-term loan to fund construction project expenditures. Interfund Transfers: Transfers In Transfers Out Amount ' General Fund Other Governmental Funds $ 1,224,783 Capital Improvement General Fund 2,423,221 ' Capital Projects Fund Other Governmental Funds 2,175,297 Other Governmental Funds General Fund 491,131 ' Other Governmental Funds 155,091 Internal Service Funds General Fund 264,438 $ 6.733,961 Transfers to the General Fund from the Other Governmental Funds were made to reimburse the ' General Fund for various capital projects. Transfers to the Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund from the General Fund and Other Governmental Funds were made to provide the funding necessary to accomplish those projects ' approved by the City Council. Transfers from the General Fund to the Other Governmental Funds were made to provide for debt service payments. Transfers from the General Fund to the Internal Service Funds were made to provide for purchases of a vehicle and equipment and uninsured insurance losses. I See independent auditors' report. -41- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 4. CAPI'TALASSETS: A summary of changes in the Governmental Activities capital assets at June 30, 2006 is as follows: Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Total capital assets, not being depreciated Capital assets, being depreciated: Building and improvements Furniture and fixtures Vehicles and equipment Infrastructure Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Building and improvements Furniture and fixtures Vehicles and equipment Infrastructure Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Total Governmental Activities capital assets, net Balance Balance at July 1, 2005 Additions Deletions June 30, 2006 $ 5,252,465 $ 953,725 $ - $ 6,206,190 898,778 3,845,049 (1,796,074) 2,947,753 6,151,243 4,798,774 (1,796,074) 9,153,943 19,245,306 903,927 - 20,149,233 71,239 2,347 (5,081) 68,505 1,220,702 242,103 (76,255) 1,386,550 1,779,698 883,147 - 2,662,845 22,316,945 2,031,524 (81,336) 24,267,133 (3,804,452) (1,111,679) - (4,916,131) (58,964) (2,747) 5,081 (56,630) (782,282) (125,814) 61,170 (846,926) (92,810) (87,014) - (179,824) (4,738,508) (1,327,254) 66,251 (5,999,511) 17,578,437 704,270 (15,085) 18,267,622 $ 23.729.680 $ 5.503.044 1 (1.811.159) $ 27.421.565 Depreciation expense was charged to functions in the Statement of Activities as follows: General government Public safety Highways and streets Parks, recreation and culture Community development Internal Service Funds depreciation charges to program See independent auditors' report. -42- $ 66,632 13,746 92,319 1,123,237 11,179 20,141 $ 1.327 254 i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: ' Long-term liability activity for the year ended June 30, 2006, was as follows: ' Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Retirements Balance One Year Bonds payable: Revenue bonds $13,755,000 $ - $ (235,000) $13,520,000 $ 240,000 Unamortized discount (128,380) - 4,585 (123,795) - Compensated absences 250,241 248,658 (208,130) 290,769 96,923 Total 13.876.861 $ 248.658 (438.545) 113.686.974 $ 336.923 ' Bonds Payable: ' In December 2002, the Diamond Bar Public Financing Authority issued $13,755,000 of 2002 Series A Variable Rate Lease Revenue Bonds to finance the construction of a community/senior center project and other public improvements within the City. The bonds are special limited obligations of the Authority payable solely from revenues, consisting primarily of base rental payments paid by the City. The variable interest rate on the bonds is reset on a bi-weekly basis. As of June 30, 2006, $13,520,000 of the bonds are outstanding. ' In conjunction with the Bonds, the Authority executed a rate cap agreement on December 2, 2002 (the Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase (Counterparty) to minimize debt service cost on the 2002 .Lease Revenue Bonds (the Bonds) by setting a cap on the interest rate on the Bonds. Under the Agreement, the Counterparty will pay the Authority an amount equal to the product of. (i) the amount by which the floating rate exceeds 4.5%, (ii) the notional principal amount and (iii) the actual number of days in the calculation period divided by 365 days. The Agreement is for a notional amount equal to the outstanding principal amount of the Bonds and will decline as the principal amount declines. The Agreement terminates on January 1, 2013. Fair Value: At June 30, 2006 the Agreement had a positive fair value of $152,798. This is the amount that the Authority would receive in the event that the Agreement is terminated. The fair value was estimated by the City's financial advisor. Credit Risk: The Counterparty, JPMorgan Chase, has the following credit ratings of: (i) Standard & Poor's, AA - and (ii) Moody's, Aa2. Basis Risk: The Agreement does not expose the Authority to basis risk, which refers to a mismatch between the interest rate cap of 4.5% and the variable rate payments to be made on the debt. I See independent auditors' report. -43- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONTINUED): Bonds Payable (Continued): Termination Risk: If the rate cap is terminated, the rate on the Bonds that the Authority would prospectively have to pay will not be subject to the cap rate of 4.5%. The termination of the Agreement could therefore increase the Authority's total debt service in the event that the variable rate is higher than the cap rate of 4.5%. At June 30, 2006, the Agreement had a positive fair value of $152,798. Payments and Associated Debt: Using a variable rate of 5.08% as of June 30, 2006, debt service requirements of the Bonds and the Counterparty's payments, assuming current interest rates remain the same for remainder of the term of the Agreement, are as follows. As rates vary, the variable rate interest payments and net rate cap payments will vary. $ 13 520 000 $ 11.970,258 $ 25 490 258 $ (482.545) $ 25.007.713 Compensated Absences: The City's policies relating to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability, amounting to $290,769 at June 30, 2006 is expected to be paid in future years from future resources, typically liquidated from the General Fund. See independent auditors' report. -44- Variable Rate Debt Counter- Net Year Ending party Debt June 30, Principal Interest Total Payments Service 2007 $ 240,000 $ 686,816 $ 926,816 $ (78,416) $ 848,400 2008 255,000 674,624 929,624 (77,024) 852,600 2009 265,000 661,670 926,670 (75,545) 851,125 2010 280,000 648,208 928,208 (74,008) 854,200 2011 290,000 633,984 923,984 (72,384) 851,600 2012-2016 1,675,000 2,933,700 4,608,700 (105,168) 4,503,532 2017-2021 2,105,000 2,466,594 4,571,594 - 4,571,594 2022-2026 2,655,000 1,878,584 4,533,584 - 4,533,584 2027-2031 3,345,000 1,137,412 4,482,412 - 4,482,412 2032-2034 2,410,000 248,666 2,658,666 - 2,658,666 $ 13 520 000 $ 11.970,258 $ 25 490 258 $ (482.545) $ 25.007.713 Compensated Absences: The City's policies relating to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability, amounting to $290,769 at June 30, 2006 is expected to be paid in future years from future resources, typically liquidated from the General Fund. See independent auditors' report. -44- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 6. LIABILITY, PROPERTY AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROTECTION: The City is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Authority). The Authority is composed of 109 California public entities and is organized under a joint powers ' agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. The purpose of the Authority is to arrange and administer programs for the pooling of self-insured losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group -purchased insurance for property and other coverages. The Authority's pool began covering claims of its members in 1978. Each member government has an elected official as its representative on the Board of Directors. The Board operates through a 9 -member Executive Committee. a. Self -Insurance Programs of the Authority: ' General Liability The City pays a primary deposit to cover estimated losses for a fiscal year (claims year). Six months after the close of a fiscal year, outstanding claims are valued. A retrospective deposit computation is then made for each open claims year. Each member has a retention level of $30,000 for each loss and this is charged directly to the member's primary deposit. Losses from $30,000 to $750,000 are pooled based on each member's share of the total losses in the first layer of all of the members. Losses from $750,000 to $15,000,000 are pooled based on the t member's share of the total payroll of all the members. Losses from $15,000,000 to $50,000,000 are transferred to the California JPIA's excess insurer. Loss Development Reserves are separated by layer and allocated in the same manner as the losses with which they ' are associated. The protection for each member is $50,000,000 per occurrence and $50,000,000 annual aggregate. Workers' Compensation The City participates in the workers' compensation pool administered by the Authority. Pool deposits and retrospective adjustments are valued in a manner similar to the General Liability pool. The City is charged for the first $50,000 of each claim. Costs are pooled above that level to $50,000. Costs from $50,001 to $100,000 per claim are pooled based on the member's N losses under its retention level. Costs between $100,001 and $2,000,000 per claim are pooled based on payroll. Costs between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000 are paid by excess insurance purchased by the Authority. Costs in excess of $5,000,000 are pooled by the members based 1 on payroll. t I See independent auditors' report. -45- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 6. LIABILITY, PROPERTY AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROTECTION (CONTINUED): a. Self -Insurance Programs of the Authority (Continued): Property Insurance The City participates in the all-risk property protection program of the Authority. This insurance protection is underwritten by several insurance companies. The City's property is currently insured according to a schedule of covered property submitted by the City to the Authority. Total all-risk property insurance coverage is $100,000,000 per occurrence. There is a $5,000 per loss deductible. Premiums for the coverage are paid annually and are not subject to retroactive adjustments. Environmental Liability The City participates in the pollution legal liability and remediation legal liability insurance which is available through the Authority. This policy covers sudden and gradual pollution of scheduled property, streets, and storm drains owned by the City. Coverage is on a claims -made basis. There is a $50,000 deductible. The Insurance Authority has a limit of $50,000,000 for the 3 -year period from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008. Fidelity Bonds The City participates in the Blanket Fidelity Bond issued by the Authority to protect the City from employee dishonesty, faithful performance, depositor's forgery, computer fraud, crime -money and securities. This bond covers all employees, the Treasurer, City Clerk and/or Tax Collector and any employee required by law to be individually bonded. The bond's limit is $1,000,000 and the deductible is $2,500 per occurrence. b. Adequacy of Protection: During the past three fiscal years none of the above programs of protection have had settlements or judgments that exceed pooled or- insured coverage. There have been no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage from coverage in the prior year, with the exception of the environmental insurance coverage which has been decreased from $120,000,000 to $50,000,000. See independent auditors' report. -46- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 ' 7. OTHER REQUIRED INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES: Deficit Fund Balances The following funds reported deficit fund balances at June 30, 2006: Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund $ (655,322) ' ISTEA Special Revenue Fund (277,240) Community Development Block Grant Special Revenue Fund (121,345) The Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund deficit will be funded with various government grants in future years. The ISTEA Special Revenue Fund deficit will be reimbursed through revenues received from the California Department of Transportation. The Community Development Block Grant Special Revenue Fund deficit will be funded by future ' year revenue allocations from Los Angeles County. Expenditures Exceeded Appropriations ' Expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2006 exceeded appropriations of the following funds/departments as follows: 'Budget _ Actual Variance General Fund: ' General Government - City Attorney $ 90,000 $ 152,090 $ (62,090) Public Safety - Building and Safety 718,950 746,845 (27,895) Capital Projects Fund - Public Financing Authority - 3 (3) ' 8. PENSION PLAN: Plan Description: The City contributes to the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), an agent multiple -employer public employee defined benefit pension plan. PERS provides retirement and ' disability benefits, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. PERS acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. ' As of July 1, 2005, the City was mandated by the State to participate in the risk pool. The risk pool combines the assets and liabilities across employers of the same risk pool to provide a method to spread the risk of uncertain gains and losses over a larger base of members. The June 30, 2003 valuations were the first pooled valuations. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and city ordinance. Copies of PERS' annual financial report may be obtained from their executive office: 400 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. See independent auditors' report. -47- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 8. PENSION PLAN (CONTINUED): Funding Policy: Participants are required to contribute 7% of their annual covered salary. The City makes the contributions required of City employees on their behalf and for their account. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and city contract with employee bargaining groups. Annual Pension Cost: Under GASB 27, the City reports an annual pension cost (APC) equal to the annual required contribution (ARC) plus an adjustment for the cumulative difference between the APC and the employer's actual plan contributions for the year. The cumulative difference is called the "net pension obligation (NPO)". The ARC for the period July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 has been determined by an actuarial valuation of the plans as of June 30, 2003. The contribution rate indicated for the period is 11.148% of payroll for the Retirement Program. In order to calculate the dollar value of the ARC for inclusion in financial statements prepared as of June 30, 2006, this contribution rate, as modified by any amendments for the year, would be multiplied by the payroll of covered employees that were actually paid during the period July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. The employer is responsible for determining the NPO and the APC. A summary of principle assumptions and methods used to determine the ARC is shown below. Valuation Date: Actuarial Cost Method: Amortization Method: Average Remaining Pool: Asset Valuation Method: Actuarial Assumptions: Investment Rate of Return Projected Salary Increases Inflation Payroll Growth Individual Salary Growth See independent auditors' report. Retirement Program June 30, 2003 Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method Level Percent of Payroll 15 years as of the Valuation Date 3 year Smoothed Market 7.75% (net of administrative expenses) 3.25% to 14.45% depending on Age, Service and Type of Employment 3.00% 3.25% A merit scale varying by duration of employment coupled with an assumed annual inflation component of 3.0% and an annual production growth of 0.25%. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 ' 8. PENSION PLAN (CONTINUED): ' Annual Pension Cost (Continued): The Schedule of Funding Progress below shows the recent history of the actuarial value of assets, actuarial accrued liability, their relationship, and the relationship of the unfunded actuarial liability to payroll. Three -Year Trend Information For PERS Fiscal Annual Pension Percentage of Net Pension Year Cost (APC) APC Contributed Obligation 6/30/2004 $ 134,451 100% $ - 6/30/2005 195,270 100% = 6/30/2006 304,107 100% Schedule of Funding Progress for PERS for the Risk Pool Entry Age Normal UAAL as a Actuarial Accrued Actuarial Unfunded % of Valuation Liability Value of AAL Funded Covered Covered Date (AAL) Assets (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll (A) (B) (A -B) (B/A) (C) [(A -BIC] 6/30/03 $2,596,966,545 $2,372,879,034 $ 224,087,511 91.4 % $725,020,458 30.9 % 6/30/04 2,746,095,668 2,460,944,656 285,151,012 89.6 % 743,691,970 38.3 % ' 6/30/05 2,891,460,651 2,588,713,000 302,747,651 89.5 % 755,046,679 40.1 % 9. CONTINGENCIES: ' The City is presently involved in other matters of litigation that have arisen in the normal course of the City's business. City management believes, based upon consultation with the City Attorney, ' that these cases, in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse financial impact on the City. I See independent auditors' report. -49- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) June 30, 2006 10. CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS: The following material construction commitments existed at June 30, 2006: Project Name Grand Avenue Betterment/Beautification - WCL to ECL Traffic Signals: Pathfinder @ Peaceful Hills Grand @ Cahill Grand @ Cleghorn Left Turn: Diamond Bar Boulevard @ Cold Spring Diamond Bar Boulevard @ Highland Valley TS Mod: Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain Laurel Diamond Bar Boulevard/Grand Neighborhood Traffic Mgt Mitigations 11. OPERATING LEASES: Expenditures as of Remaining June 30, 2006 Commitments $ 1,963,030 $ 87,055 249,059 34,841 - 172,714 187,030 97,244 45,740 5,934 275,850 2,025 6,500 $ 2,323,792 73,132 187,145 146,144 S-1-20,651 The City leases building and office facilities under noncancelable operating leases. The total costs for such leases were $254,457 for the year ended June 30, 2006. The future minimum lease payments for the lease of building and office facilities are as follows: Year Ending June 30, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total 12. RESTATEMENT OF NET ASSETS: $ 256,880 261,727 264,151 268,997 179.332 $ 1,231,08-7 The balances of net assets at July 1, 2005 of the governmental activities and the Self -Insurance Internal Service Fund were decreased by $244,565 to $45,887,235 and $1,468,053, respectively, to adjust the balance of the due to other governments liability. See independent auditors' report. -50- t i ' REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION i THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY -52- ' BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULES II GENERAL FUND ' The General Fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government, which are not legally or by sound financial management to be accounted for in another fund. ' SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by law or administrative action for a specified purpose. _Proposition A Transit Fund - This fund is used to account for the receipt and expenditure of the City's share of the 1/2 cent sales tax levied in Los Angeles County for local transit purposes. 1 i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE GENERALFUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Taxes Intergovernmental revenue Fines and forfeitures Licenses, permits and fees Investment income Other revenues TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: General government: City Council City Manager/Clerk City Attorney Finance Human resources Information systems General government Public information Subtotal general government Public safety: Law enforcement Fire protection Animal control Emergency preparedness Building and safety Subtotal public safety Highways and streets Parks, recreation and culture Community development TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (IJNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfers in Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report and note to required supplementary information. -54- Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Actual Positive (Negative) Ori ing a1 _ Final _ $ 8,606,700 $ 8,561,700 $ 9,508,757 $ 947,057 227,386 3,209,805 4,221,645 706,000 4,449,031 589,922 (113,889) 746,000 2,179,000 2,375,260 2,389,149 350,000 550,000 985,531 772,641 435,531 125,441 408,200 15,499,705 647,200 17,061,805 18,595,031 1,633,226 188,500 188,500 164,024 831,717 24,476 131,633 934,850 90,000 963,350 90,000 152,090 (62,090) 391,050 400,550 319,458 81,092 57,770 224,050 226,959 169,189 698,051 15,253 629,015 863,360 713,304 955,126 860,888 94,238 487,900 486,450 356,242 130,208 3,808,725 s 4,024,239 3,551,659 472,580 4,782,300 4,822,300 4,538,914 283,141 7,500 94,000 7,500 94,000 7,359 89,307 4,693 68,550 73,800 13,573 746,845 60,227 (27,895) 556,280 5,508,630 718,950 5,716,550 5,395,998 320,552 2,139,715 2,849,8572,439.740 41.0,117 2,592,640 2,804,767 2,613,834 190,933 1,955,250 2,988,2492� 16 726,433 16,004,960 18,383,662 16_ 263,047 2,120,615 (505,255) (1,321,857) 2,431,984 3,753,841 1,376,700 1,391,700 1,224,783 (3,178,790) (166,917) 648,093 (2,700) (3,826,883) (844,000) (21 05,193) (1,954,007) 481,176 (1,349,255) (3,757,040) 477,977 4, 235,017 25,935,639 25,935,639 25.935,639 - $ 24,586,384 $ 22,178,599 $$ 26� $ 4,235,017 See independent auditors' report and note to required supplementary information. -54- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE PROPOSITION A TRANSIT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue Charges for services Investment income TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: Highway and streets TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with See independent auditors' report and note to required supplementary information. -55- Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 866,300 $ 966,300 $ 959,518 $ (6,782) 550,000 550,000 659,218 109,218 _ 22,000 22,000 35,135 13,135 1,438,300 1,538, 300 1,653, 871 115,571 1,202,130 1,650,918 1,634,577 16,341 1,202,130 1,650,918 1,634,577 16,341 236,170 (112,618) 19,294 131,912 ___Ll 8,936 918,936 918,936 - $ 1,155,106 $ 806,318 $ 938,230 $ 131,912 See independent auditors' report and note to required supplementary information. -55- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTE TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION June 30, 2006 BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING: The City adheres to the following general procedures in establishing its annual budget, which is reflected in the accompanying basic financial statements: a. The annual budget adopted by the City Council provides for the general operation of the City. It includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. Budgeted appropriations lapse at the end of the year. b. The City Council approves total budgeted appropriations and amendments to appropriations throughout the year. The City Council must approve budget appropriation transfers between departments within a fund. The departments of the General Fund are considered to be departments for purposes of this requirement. Actual expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the fund level. c. Annual budgets are adopted for the General and certain Special Revenue Funds on a basis substantially consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, actual revenues and expenditures can be compared with related budgeted amounts without any significant reconciling items. itures presents he d. The budgetary information shown for changes madesbynthe C'tydCouncilepFor thetyearrended adopted budget adjusted for any b June 30, 2006, supplemental appropriations in the amount of $4,969,353 were made. e. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device. Commitments for materials and services, such as purchase orders and contracts, are recorded during the year as expenditures. Appropriations which are encumbered at encumbrances to assist in controlling year end lapse, and then are added to the following year's budgeted appropriations. However, encumbrances at year-end are reported as reservations of fund balance. See independent auditors' report. -56- ISUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION J i 1 -57- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING BALANCE SHEET OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS ASSETS Cash and investments Cash and investments with fiscal agents Accounts receivable Due from other governments Notes receivable TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES: Accounts payable Accrued payroll Due to other funds Deferred revenue Advances from other governments TOTAL LIABILITIES FUND BALANCES: Reserved for: Encumbrances Debt service Unreserved reported in: Special revenue funds Capital projects funds TOTAL FUND BALANCES TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES See independent auditors' report. June 30, 2006 Debt Capital $ 135,259 $ - $ - $ 135,259 3,729 - - 3,729 355,371 - - 355,371 520,939 - - 520,939 137,595 - - 137,595 1,152,893 - - 1,152,893 30,758 - - 30,758 - 287,020 - 287,020 4,834,723 - - 4,834,723 4,865,481 287,020 - 5,152,501 $ 6,018,374 $ 287,020 $ - $ 6,305,394 -58- Service Fund Projects Fund Total Special Public Public Other Revenue Financing Financing Governmental Funds Authority Authority Funds $ 5,096,866 $ - $ - $ 5,096,866 - 287,020 - 287,020 49,989 - - 49,989 733,924 - - 733,924 137,595 - - 137,595 $ 6,018,374 $ 287,020 $ - $ 6,305,394 $ 135,259 $ - $ - $ 135,259 3,729 - - 3,729 355,371 - - 355,371 520,939 - - 520,939 137,595 - - 137,595 1,152,893 - - 1,152,893 30,758 - - 30,758 - 287,020 - 287,020 4,834,723 - - 4,834,723 4,865,481 287,020 - 5,152,501 $ 6,018,374 $ 287,020 $ - $ 6,305,394 -58- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANCES IN FUND BALANCES - OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 1 For the year ended June 30, 2006 I See independent auditors' report. -59- Debt Capital Service Fund Projects Fund Total Public Public Other iSpecial Revenue Financing Financing Governmental Funds Authority Authority Funds REVENUES: Special assessments $ 504,908 $ - $ - $ 504,908 Intergovernmental revenue 3,170,714 - 3,170,714 Charges for services 211,096 - - 211,096 Investment income 220,245 5,444 3,065 228,754 Other revenues 19,575 19,575 TOTAL REVENUES 4,126,538 5,444 3,065 4,135,047 EXPENDITURES: Current: Public safety 8,261 - - 8,261 Highways and streets 695,180 - - 695,180 Community development 486,723 - - 486,723 Debt service: ' Principal 235,000 235,000 Interest and fiscal charges - 404,072 3 404,075 ' TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,190,164 639,072 3 1,829,239 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER ' (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 2,936,374 (633,628) 3,062 2,305,808 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfers in - 646,222 - 646,222 Transfers out (3,400,079) (1551092) (3,555,171) ' TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) (3,400,079) 646.222 (155,092) (2,908,949) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES (463,705) 121594 (152,030) (603,141) FUND BALANCES - BEGINNING OF YEAR 5,329,186 274,426 152.030 5,755,642 ' FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 4,865,481 $ 287,020 $ - $ 5,152,501 I See independent auditors' report. -59- OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS The following Special Revenue Funds have been classified as other governmental funds in the accompanying financial statements: State Gas Tax Fund -This fund is used to d Highways rstate Cod gasoline law requires that these revenues 2105, 2106, 2107 and 2107.5 of the Streets an be utilized solely for street related purposes. Pro osition C Transit Fund -This fund account Metropolitan Transportation Authority or the City's Proposition C funds from the Los Angeles Countyty transit and transit -related improvement projects. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA Fund - This fund is used to account for transport related receipts and expenditures. Integrated Waste Management Fund -This raccount for revenues and expenditures related to the City's waste reduction efforts as related to used Traffic Congestion Relief Fund This fund the repair and �onstnzunt for ction ostreets.Governor's transportation congestion policy program revenue received for Air Quality Improvement Fund - This fund is used to account for motor vehicle registration fees received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to the California Clean Ai Act of account or California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (rid aEnd) expendituresnThis made for the purchase f of revenues received from the California CLEEP fu high-technology equipment. Park and Facility Development Fund - This fund is used to account for the development and enhancement of the City's parks. e City's Co unitv Development Block Grant federal go rnment v als fund is used to account the County of Los Angeles oCohmmunity allotment of CDBG funds from the federal Bove Development Commission. These funds are used to fund community development programs and projects benefiting low and moderate income citizens. ' OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (CONTINUED) Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund - This fund is used to account for COPS grants received from both the state and federal government. The purpose of these funds is to enhance the City's public safety budget and to fund special public safety related projects. 1 Asset Seizure Fund - This fund is used to account for Narcotics Asset Forfeiture funds received from the federal government. It is required that these funds be used to enhance drug and law enforcement activities. Landscape Maintenance District Fund - This fund is used to account of revenues and expenditures ' related to the special property tax assessments which were set up in accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of these districts is to improve the landscaping of City owned medians and hillsides. I t 1 _61_ CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING BALANCE SHEET OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS June 30, 2006 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES: $ _ $ $ 8,218 $ - Accounts payable$ - _ _ 1,922 Accrued payroll _ 277,240 - Due to other funds _ 277,240 - Deferred revenue - Advances from other governments - - TOTAL LIABILITIES - - 554,480 10,140 - FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS): Reserved for: _ Encumbrances 390,813 1,356,317 (277,240) 487,530 241,461 Unreserved TOTAL FUND 317 (277,240) 487,530 241,461 BALANCES (DEFICITS) 390,813 1,356,_ TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES $ 390,813 $ 1,356,317 $ 277,240 $ 497,670 $ 241,461 See independent auditors' report. -62- Proposition Integrated Traffic State C Waste Congestion Gas Tax Transit IS_ TEA Management Relief ASSETS $ 289,038 $ 1,356,317 $ - $ 447,681 $ 166,393 Cash and investments _ - 49>989 Accounts receivable 101,775 - 277,240 - 75,068 Due from other governments Notes receivable - TOTAL ASSETS $ 390,813 $ 1,356,317 $ 277,240 $ 497,670 $ 241,461 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES: $ _ $ $ 8,218 $ - Accounts payable$ - _ _ 1,922 Accrued payroll _ 277,240 - Due to other funds _ 277,240 - Deferred revenue - Advances from other governments - - TOTAL LIABILITIES - - 554,480 10,140 - FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS): Reserved for: _ Encumbrances 390,813 1,356,317 (277,240) 487,530 241,461 Unreserved TOTAL FUND 317 (277,240) 487,530 241,461 BALANCES (DEFICITS) 390,813 1,356,_ TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES $ 390,813 $ 1,356,317 $ 277,240 $ 497,670 $ 241,461 See independent auditors' report. -62- 106,967 75,088 1,825,715 (121,345) 174,611 331,188 274,376 4,865,481 $ 114,265 $ 75,088 $ 1,947,992 $ 259,017 $ 174,611 $ 331,644 $ 352,256 $ 6,018,374 ' Air Park and Landscape Total Other Quality Facility Asset Maintenance Special Improvement CLEEP Development CDBG COPS Seizure District Revenue Funds $ 95,516 $ 75,088 $ 1,825,715 $ - $ 174,611 $ 331,644 $ 334,863 $ 5,096,866 1 18,749 - - 122,277 - 121,422 137,595 - - - - - - - 17,393 - 49,989 733,924 137,595 $ 114,265 $ 75,088 $ 1,947,992 $ 259,017 $ 174,611 $ 331,644 $ 352,256 $ 6,018,374 1 $ 6,760 $ - $ - $ 43,214 $ - $ 456 $ 76,611 $ 135.259 538 - - - - 1,269 3,729 - - 78,131 -= - 355,371 122,277 121,422 520,939 ' - - 137,595 - - 137,595 ' 7,298 122,277 380.362 - 456 77,880 1,152,893 24,209 - 419 - - 6,130 30.758 82,758 75,088 1,825,715 (121,764) 174,611 331,188 268,246 4,834,723 106,967 75,088 1,825,715 (121,345) 174,611 331,188 274,376 4,865,481 $ 114,265 $ 75,088 $ 1,947,992 $ 259,017 $ 174,611 $ 331,644 $ 352,256 $ 6,018,374 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS For the year ended June 30, 2006 TOTAL OTHER 152,686) (29,525) FINANCING USES (1,295,827) (690,826) - NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES (194,485) 182,009 282,630 (76,246) 241,461 FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS) BEGINNING OF YEAR 585>298 1,174,308 (559,870) 563,776 _ FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS) - END OF YEAR $ 390,813 $ 1,356,317 $ (277,240) $ 487,530 $ 241,461 See independent auditors' report. -64- Proposition Integrated Traffic State C Waste Congestion Gas Tax - Transit ISTEA Management Relief REVENUES: $ _ $ $ $ _ $ - Special assessments revenue 1,078,352 825 ,189 282,630 42,875 267,292 Intergovernmental _ 211,096 Charges for services 22,990 47,646 19,273 3,694 Investment income - Other revenues - TOTAL REVENUES 1,101,342 872,835 282,630 273,244 270,986 EXPENDITURES: Current: - _ Public safety - _ Highways and streets _ 196,804 - Community development - - - 196,804 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - - EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,1_01,342 872,835 282,630 76,440 270,986 OTHER FINANCING USES: (1,295,827) ( 690,826) " (152,686) (29,525) Transfers out TOTAL OTHER 152,686) (29,525) FINANCING USES (1,295,827) (690,826) - NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES (194,485) 182,009 282,630 (76,246) 241,461 FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS) BEGINNING OF YEAR 585>298 1,174,308 (559,870) 563,776 _ FUND BALANCES (DEFICITS) - END OF YEAR $ 390,813 $ 1,356,317 $ (277,240) $ 487,530 $ 241,461 See independent auditors' report. -64- i I - - (194,121) (248,728) (129,307) - (659,059) (3,400,079) ' Air (129,307) - Park and (3,400,079) (12,953) 2,701 (74,585) 11,577 Total Other (822,634) (463,705) Quality 119,920 72,387 1,900,300 Facility 189,134 319,845 1,097,010 Asset Maintenance Special Improvement CLEEP Development CDBG COPS Seizure District Revenue Funds 1 $ 71,314 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 504,908 $ 504,908 - 29,067 460,560 113,435 - - 3,170,714 5,397 2,701 70,894 _ - 9,020 - 11,933 - 26,697 211,096 220,245 - 19,575 _ - - - 19,575 76,711 2,701 119,536 460,560 122,455 11,933 531,605 4,126,538 _ - - - 7,671 590 - 8,261 89,664 - - - 200,255 - - - 695,180 695,180 - - 486,723 89,664 - - 200,255 7,671 590 695,180 1,190,164 ' (12,953) 2,701 119,536 260,305 114,784 11,343 (163,575) 2,936,374 I - - (194,121) (248,728) (129,307) - (659,059) (3,400,079) 1 -65- - - (194,121) (248,728) (129,307) - (659,059) (3,400,079) (12,953) 2,701 (74,585) 11,577 (14,523) 11,343 (822,634) (463,705) 119,920 72,387 1,900,300 (132,922) 189,134 319,845 1,097,010 5,329,186 $ 106,967 $ 75,088 $ 1,825,715 $ (121,345) $ 174,611$ 331,188 $ 274,376 $ 4,865,481 1 -65- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL STATE GAS TAX SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue Investment income TOTAL REVENUES OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. -66- Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 1,040,670 $ 1,040,670 $ 1,078,352 $ 37,682 7,000 7,000 22,990 15,990 1,047,670 1,047,670 1,101,342 53,672 (1,202,400) (1,202,400) (1,295,827) (93,427) (1,202,400) (1,202,400) (1,295,827) (93,427) (154,730) (154,730) (194,485) (39,755) 585,298 585,298 585,298 $ 430,568 $ 430,568 $ 390,813 $ (39,755) -66- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PROPOSITION C TRANSIT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive REVENUES: Original Final Actual (Negative) Intergovernmental revenue $ 718,540 $ 718,540 $ Investment income 18,000 825,189 $ 106,649 18,000 47,646 29,646 TOTAL REVENUES 736,540 736,540 872,835 136,295 ' OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out (719,000) (1,019,000) (690,826) 328,174 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (719,000) (1,019,000) (690,826) 328,174 NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 17,540 (282,460) 182,009 464,469 FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,174,308 1,174,308 1,174,308 FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 1,191,848 $ 891,848 $ 1,356,317 $ 464,469 t t 1 See independent auditors' report. -67- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ISTEA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue TOTAL REVENUES OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 2,535,845 $ 2,535,845 $ 282,630 $ (2,253,215) 2,535,845 2,535,845 282,630 (2,253,215) (2,535,845) (2,535,845) - 2,535,845 (2,535,845) (2,535,845) - 2,535,845 282,630 282,630 (559,870) (559,870) (559,870) - $ (559,870) $ (559,870) $ (277,240) $ 282,630 -68- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue Charges for services $ 170,000 $ 200,000 170,000 $ 200,000 42,875 211,096 $ (127,125) 11,096 Investment income 12,000 12,000 19,273 7,273 ' TOTAL REVENUES 382,000 382,000 273,244 (108,756) EXPENDITURES: Current: Community development 422,850 441,026 196,804 244,222 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 422,850 441,026 196,804 244,222 ' EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (40,850) (59,026) 76,440 135,466 OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out (185,000) (185,000) (152,686) 32,314 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (185,000) (1.85,000) (152,686) 32,314 NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (225,850) (244,026) (76,246) 167,780 FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 563,776 563,776 563,776 - FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 337,926 $ 319,750 $ 487,530 $ 167,780 I See independent auditors' report. -69- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF SPECIAL REVENUE FUND REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue Investment income TOTAL REVENUES OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. For the year ended June 30, 2006 Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ - $ 250,000 -70- 250,000 - (250,000) (29,525) 220,475 241,461 241,461 $ 241,461 $ 241,461 Variance with Final Budget Positive Actual (Negative) $ 267,292 $ 17,292 3,694 3,694 270,986 20,986 - (250,000) (29,525) 220,475 241,461 241,461 $ 241,461 $ 241,461 1 i 1 t n CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue Investment income TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: Community development TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. Variance with 168,690 172,347 168,690 172,347 89,664 82,683 89,664 82,683 (99,690) (103,347) (12,953) 90,394 (7,800) (7,800) - 7,800 (7,800) (7,800) - 7,800 (107,490) (111,147) (12,953) 98,194 119,920 119,920 119,920 - $ 12,430 $ 8,773 $ 106,967 $ 98,194 -71- Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 71,314 $ 6,314 4,000 4,000 5,397 1,397 69,000 69,000 76,711 7,711 168,690 172,347 168,690 172,347 89,664 82,683 89,664 82,683 (99,690) (103,347) (12,953) 90,394 (7,800) (7,800) - 7,800 (7,800) (7,800) - 7,800 (107,490) (111,147) (12,953) 98,194 119,920 119,920 119,920 - $ 12,430 $ 8,773 $ 106,967 $ 98,194 -71- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CLEEP SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 See independent auditors' report. -72- Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) REVENUES: $ - $ $ 2,701 $ 2,701 Investment income - 2,701 2,701 TOTAL REVENUES - EXPENDITURES: Current: 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 Public safety TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25,000 25,000 - - 25,000 - EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER 25,000) (25,000) 2,701 27,701 (UNDER) EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 72,387 72,387 72,387 - FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 47,387 $ 47,387 $ 75,088 $ 27,701 See independent auditors' report. -72- 1 1 See independent auditors' report. -73- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PARK AND FACILITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive REVENUES: Original Final Actual (.Negative) Intergovernmental revenue $ 863,483 $ 863,483 $ Investment income 37,000 29,067 $ (834,416) 37,000 Other revenues 70,894 33,894 - - 19,575 19,575 ' TOTAL REVENUES 900,483 900,483 119,536 (780,947) OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out (1,883,774) (1,883,774) (194,121) 1,689,653 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (1,8831774) (1,883,774) (194,121) 1,689,653 NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (983,291) (983,291) (74,585) 908,706 FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,900,300 1,900,300 1,900,300 - ' FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 917,009 $ 917,009 $ 1,825,715 $ 908,706 1 1 See independent auditors' report. -73- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CDBG SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Intergovernmental revenue TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: Community development TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 753,041 $ 922,034 $ 460,560 $ (461,474) 753,041 922,034 460,560 (461,474) 232,205 386,201 200,255 185,946 232,205 386,201 200,2551 85,946 520,836 535,833 260,305 (275,528) (380,915) (395,915) (248,728) 147,187 (380,915) (395,915) (248,728) 147,187 139,921 139,918 11,577 (128,341) (132,922) (132,922) (132,922) $ 6,999 $ 6,996 $ (121,345) $ (128,341) -74- a See independent auditors' report. -75- ICITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL COPS SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Budgeted Amounts Fina] Budget Positive REVENUES: On nal Final Actual (Negative) Intergovernmental revenue Investment income $ 113,000 $ 113,000 $ 113,435 $ 435 4,000 4,000 9,020 5,020 TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: 117,000 117,000 122,455 5,455 Current: Public safety 36,900 36,900 7,671 29,229 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 36,900 36,900 7,671 29,229 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 80,100 80,100 114,784 34,684 OTHER FINANCING USES: ' Transfers out (182,700) (182,700) (129,307) 53,393 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (182,700) (182,700) (129,307) 53,393 ' NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (102,600) (102,600) (14,523) 88,077 1 FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 189,134 189,134 189,134 - FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 86,534 $ 86,534 $ 174,611 $ 88,077 a See independent auditors' report. -75- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ASSET SEIZURE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Investment income TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Current: Public safety TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. -76- Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 11,933 $ 4,933 7,000 7,000 11,933 4,933 25,000 25,000 590 24,410 25,000 25,000 590 24,410 (18,000) (18,000) 11,343 29,343 319,845 319,845 319,845 - $ 301,845 $ 301,845 $ 331,188 $ 29,343 -76- [l Il CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with See independent auditors' report. -77- Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive REVENUES: Onginal Final Actual (Negative) Special assessments Investment income $ 551,727 $ 551,727 $ 504,908 $ (46,819) 16,000 16,000 26,697 10,697 TOTAL REVENUES 567,727 567,727 531,605 (36,122) EXPENDITURES: Current: Highways and streets 783,502 798,584 695,180 103,404 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 783,502 798,584 695,180 103,404 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (215,775) (230,857) (163,575) 67,282 OTHER FINANCING USES: Transfers out (80,400) (80,400) (659,059) (578,659) TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (80,400) (80,400) (659,059) (578,659) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (296,175) (311,257) (822,634) (511,377) FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,097,010 1,097,010 1,097,010 _ FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR $ 800,835 $ 785,753 $ 274,376 $ (511,377) See independent auditors' report. -77- THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ' OTHER DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is used primarily to account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of principal and interest on long-term liabilities of the City. The following has been classified as an other governmental fund in the accompanying financial statements. l Public Financing Authority Fund - This fund is used to account for the payment of principal and ' interest on the Lease Revenue Bonds. 1 t 1 -79- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 REVENUES: Investment income EXPENDITURES: Debt service: Principal Interest and fiscal charges TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfers in Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original Final Actual (Negative) $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,444 $ 444 235,000 235,000 235,000 - 474,500 474,500 404,072 70,428 709,500 709,500 639,072 70,428 (704,500) (704,500) (633,628) 70.872 708,200 708,200 646,222 (61,978) (278,126) - - 430,074 708,200 646,222 (61,978) (274,426) 3,700 12,594 8,894 274,426 274,426 274,426 - $ _ $ 278,126 $ 287,020 $ 8,894 -80- OTHER AND MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS ' Capital Projects Funds are established to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Special Revenue Funds). OTHER FUNDS: ' Public Financing Authority Fund - This fund is used to account for the financing of public improvements and other capital purchases for the City. ' MAJOR FUND: 'Cavital Improvement Fund - This fund is used to account for the costs of constructing street improvements, park improvements and other public improvements not normally included within the other Capital Projects funds. Financing is provided by developer fees and interfund transfers from the ' Special Revenue Funds and the General Fund. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive Original _ Final Actual (Negative) REVENUES: 5,000 $ 3,065 $ (1,935) Investment income $ 6,000 $ - TOTAL REVENUES 6,000 5,000 3,065 (1,935) EXPENDITURES: Debt service: 3 (3) Interest and fiscal charges - TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER 6>000 5,000 3,062 (1,938) (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING USES: (158,030) - (155,092) (155,092) Transfers out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES (158,030) - (155,092) (155,092) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (152,030) 5,000 (152,030) (157,030) FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR 152,030 152,030 _ 152,030 " $ - $ 157,030 $ - $ (157,030) FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR See independent auditors' report. -92- i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND For the year ended June 30, 2006 Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive REVENUES: Original Final Actual (Negative) i Intergovernmental revenue $ 1,322,439 $ 730,106 $ 241,878 $ (488,228) Licenses, permits and fees 250,000 250,000 - (250,000) Investment income 140,000 140,000 1,150 (138,850) ' TOTAL REVENUES 1,712,439 1,120,1.06 243,028 (877,078) EXPENDITURES: iCapital outlay 8,614,476 10,563,098 5,320,597 5,242,501 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,614,476 10,563,098 5,320,597 5,242,501 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (6,902,037) (9,442,992) (5,077,569) 4,365,423 ' OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: Transfers in 6,902,037 9,300,379 4,598,518 (4,701,861) TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 6,902,037 9,300,379 4,598,518 (4,701,861) NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE - (142,613) (479,051) (336,438) iFUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) - BEGINNING OF YEAR (176,271) (1761271) (176,271) _ FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR $ (176,271) $ (318,884) $ (655,322) $ (336,438) i See independent auditors' report. -83- THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Internal Service Funds have been established to finance and account for goods and services provided by one City department to other City departments or agencies. Funds included are: i Self -Insurance Fund - This fund is used to account for the payments made for the City'sgeneral general liability insurance premiums. Equipment Replacement Fund - This fund is used to account for the replacement of the City's rolling ' equipment stock or vehicles. Computer Replacement Fund - This fund is used to account for the replacement and/or enhancement of the City's computer-related equipment. 1 1 1 t CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and investments NONCURRENT ASSETS: Capital assets: Machinery and equipment Less accumulated depreciation TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES CURRENT LIABILITIES: Due to other governments NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Unrestricted TOTAL NET ASSETS See independent auditors' report. June 30, 2006 Self- Equipment Computer Insurance Replacement Replacement Totals $ 1,571,831 $ 169,743 $ 91,724 $ 1,833,298 - 177,196 11,417 188,613 (91,817) (10,430) (102,247) - 85,379 987 86,366 1,571,831 255,122 92,711 1,919,664 361,356 - - 361,356 - 85,379 987 86,366 1,210,475 169,743 91,724 1,471,942 $ 1,210,475 $ 255,122 $ 92,711 $ 1,558,308 -86- 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1 For the year ended June 30, 2006 1 Self- Equipment Computer Insurance Replacement I Replacement Totals OPERATING EXPENSES: 1 Insurance premiums $ 488,019 $ - $ $ 4 Depreciation - 17,928 2,213 20,1141 ' TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 488,019 17,928 2,213 508,1.60 OPERATING LOSS (488,019) (17,928) (2,213) (508,160) NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): Loss on disposal of capital asset - - (261) (261) 1 Investment income 50,441 6,256 1,186 57,883 TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) 50,441 6,256 925 57,622 1 LOSS BEFORE TRANSFERS (437,578) (11,672) (1,288) (450,538) 1 TRANSFERS IN 180,000 25,338 59,100 264,438 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS (257,578) 13,666 57,812 (186,100) ' TOTAL NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, AS RESTATED 1,468,053 241,456 34,899 1,744,408 TOTAL NET ASSETS - END OF YEAR $ 1,210,475 $ 255,122 $ 92,711 $ 1,558,308 i 1 i i See independent auditors' report. -87- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS For the year ended June 30, 2006 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Insurance deposits Insurance payments NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Transfers from other funds NET CASH PROVIDED BY NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of capital assets NET CASH USED BY CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Investment income NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING LOSS TO NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used by operating activities: Depreciation Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivables Increase (decrease) in due to other govemments TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES See independent auditors' report. Self- Equipment Computer Insurance Replacement Replacement Totals $ 48,148 $ $ - $ 48,148 (211,752) - (211,752) (163,604) - (163,604) 180,000 25,338 59,100 264,438 180,000 25,338 59,100 264,438 (92,379) (92,379) (92,379) (92,379) 50,441 6,256 1,186 57,883 50,441 6,256 1,186 57.883 66,837 (60,785) 60,286 66,338 1,504.994 230,528 31,438 1,766,960 $ 1,571.831 $ 169,743 $ 91,724 $ 1,833,298 $ (488,019) $ (17,928) S (2,213) $ (508,160) 17,928 2,213 20,141 48,148 - - 48.148 276.267 - - 276,267 324.415 17,928 2,213 344,556 S (163,604) S - $ - $ (163.604) -88- DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICAL SECTION CONTENTS ' June 30, 2006 ' detailed This art of the Cit of Diamond Bar's comprehensive annual financial report p Y presents information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial the statements, note overall financial ' disclosures, and required supplementary information say about government's health. Pages es Contents: Financial Trends - These schedules contain trend information to help the ' reader understand how the City's financial performance and well-being have changed over time. 90-93 ' Revenue Capacity - These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. 94-97 ' Debt Cauacity - These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. 98-99 Demographic and Economic Information - These schedules offer demographic ' and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place. 100-101 ' Operating Information - These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. 102-103 1 1 -89- City of Diamond Bar Net Assets by Component Last Four Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) * The City implemented GASB 34 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. Information prior to the implementation of GASB 34 is not available. Source: City Finance Department -90- Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 2004 2005 2006 Governmental activities: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 8,237,553 $ 10,844,807 $ 10,692,694 $ 14,593,935 Restricted for: Debt service - - 245,763 243,697 Capital projects 5,988,178 241,767 3,775,552 3,323,474 Specific programs - - 1,398,057 1,296,806 Unrestricted 26,205,849 31,231,827 29,775,169 29,461,178 Total governmental activities net assets $ 40,431,580 $ 42,318,401 $ 45,887,235 $ 48,919,090 * The City implemented GASB 34 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. Information prior to the implementation of GASB 34 is not available. Source: City Finance Department -90- I Source: City Finance Department -91- City of Diamond Bar ' Changes in Net Assets Last Four Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) tFiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 2004 2005- 2006 ' Expenses: Governmental activities: $ 3,315,082 $ 3,71.3,530 $ 3,997,319 $ 4,203,123 General government 4,988,449 4,875,823 4,969,183 5,418,005 Public safety 1,006,768 1,365,737 4,622,014 5,240,568 Highways and streets 3,370,116 5,724,606 1,050,025 2,759,718 Community development 2,309,150 2,580,454 3,814,887 3,737,071 Parks, recreation and culture 535,752 171,223 270,735 423,320 ' Interest and fiscal charges 15,525,317 18,431,373 18,724,163 21,781,805 Total expenses ' Program revenues: Governmental activities: ' Charges for services: 74,805 225,656 486,925 707,272 General Government 813,617 733,902 1,159,264 1,277,170 Public safety 517930 529,330 1,328,637 1,555,993 Highways and streets . 908,330 933,985 7388 16>841 ' Community development 558.227 610,772 1,147,088 1,260,849 Parks, recreation and culture 4,390,722 4,068,446 4,040,785 5,281,308 Operating grants and contributions 1,779,510 261,994 1,150 ' Capital grants and contributions 9,043,141 7,364,085 8,170,587 10,100,583 Total program revenues General revenues: Taxes: 2,692,723 2,682,872 3,155,723 6,769,553 Property taxes 578,680 628,564 717,879 718,889 ' Transient occupancy taxes 2,965,292 3,167,901 2,645,096 2,964,877 Sales taxes _ 863,245 984,472 ' Property taxes in lieu of sales taxes Franchise taxes 828,242 912,531 941,319 4,386,800 996,567 413,230 Unrestricted Motor vehicle in lieu 3,370,387 2,716,134 416,423 Property transfer tax 367,638 367,464 351077 413,247 35,283 35,522 Other taxes 34,989 439,455 182,069 532,091 1,051,922 Investment income 84,795 250,250 676,292 361.622 Other revenue 11,362.201 10.942,862 14,366,975 14,713,077 Total general revenues $ 4,880.025 $ (124,426) $ 3,813,399 $ 3,031,855 Change in net assets * The City implemented GASB 34 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. tInformation prior to the implementation of GASB 34 is not available. I Source: City Finance Department -91- City of Diamond Bar Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Four Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) All other governmental funds: Reserved 5,719,861 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 5,555,988 2,274,829 2003 2004 2005 2006 General fund: Special revenue funds 8,030,278 Reserved $ 440,407 $ 866,843 $ 1,125,918 $ 1,310,172 Unreserved 21,913,219 21,796,659 24,809,721 25,103,444 Total general fund 22,353,626 22,663,502 25,935,639 26,413,616 All other governmental funds: Reserved 5,719,861 105,861 5,555,988 2,274,829 Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds 8,030,278 6,043,352 6,111,202 5,772,953 Debt Service Fund - 505,915 274,426 - Capital projects funds 268,317 241,767 (5,443,309) (2,612,373) Total all other governmental funds 14,018,456 6,896,895 6,498,307 5,435,409 Total fund balances $ 36,372,082 $ 29,560,397 $ 32,433,946 $ 31,849,025 The City has elected to show only four years of data for this schedule. Source: City Finance Department -92- City of Diamond Bar ' Changes in Fund Balances, Governmental Funds Last Four Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) tRevenues: 2004 2005 Taxes $ 7,432,575$ Special assessments $ 8,632,837 Intergovernmental 557,601 Charges for services 593,778 Fines and forfeitures 8,602,856 Licenses and permits 8.306,557 Investment income 706,137 Other ' Total revenues 813,617 Expenditures: 713,201 Current: ' General government 1,732,555 Public safety 658,922 Highway and streets 654,066 Parks, recreation and culture ' Community development 480,740 Capital outlay 20,313.653 Debt service: Principal 21,874,774 Interest charges $ 9,982,804 Fiscal charges ' Total expenditures Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 2004 2005 2006 $ 7,432,575$ 7,759,331 $ 8,632,837 $ 9,508,757 557,601 555,232 593,778 504,908 8,602,856 6,353,152 8.306,557 8,821,141 706,137 709,011 761,040 870,314 813,617 733,903 713,201 589,922 1,467,127 1,457,345 1,732,555 2,389,149 658,922 395,929 654,066 1,250,570 74.818 234,951 480,740 792.216 20,313.653 18,198,854 21,874,774 24,726,977 3,163,516 3,663,055 3,787,005 3,551,659 4,973,248 4,857,179 4,954,630 5,404,259 1,006,768 1,365,737 4,301,146 4,769,497 1,946,025 2,114,090 2,750,815 2,613,834 2,808,613 3,419,856 1,050,025 2,748,539 8,057,482 9,261,289 1,682,830 5,320,597 - - 235,000 86.562 145,580 237,487 404,075 1.080,940 - - 23,123,154 24,826.786 18,763.938 25,047,460 (2,809,501) (6,627,932) 3,110,836 (320,483) ' Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 3.61% 0.43% 1.15% 2.06% ' The City has elected to show only four years of data for this schedule. I Source: City Finance Department -93- Other financing sources (uses): Bond issued 13,755,000 - Bonds discount and issuance costs (769,300) 10,59,848 2 - 9,906.970 - 2,363.367 6,469,523 Transfers in (10.453,243) (10,090,723) (2_ .600__654) (6.733,961) Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) 12,792,305 (183.753) (237,287) (264,438) Net changes in fund balances $ 9,982,804 $ (6.811,685) $ 2.873.549 $ (584,921) ' Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 3.61% 0.43% 1.15% 2.06% ' The City has elected to show only four years of data for this schedule. I Source: City Finance Department -93- City of Diamond Bar Assessed and Estimated Actual Values of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years (unaudited) Fiscal Year Total Ended Net Tax Direct June 30, Secured Unsecured Nonunitary Taxable Values Exemptions Rate 1997 $ 3,613,273,657 $ 64,175,586 $ 828,963 $ 3,678,278,206 $ 27,479,616 0.0529% 1998 3,608,349,286 67,777,550 884,347 3,677,011,183 37,731,129 0.0529% 1999 3,692,120,496 74,316,958 876,688 3,767,314,142 38,373,706 0.1529% 2000 3,836,874,815 63,750,454 125,921 3,900,751,190 36,494,583 0.1585% 2001 4,058,203,577 67,345,947 11.6,405 4,125,665,929 40,088,648 0.1704% 2002 4,286,132,334 71,531,889 127,441 4,357,791,664 41,869,703 0.0502% 2003 4,618,700,097 69,981,865 122,697 4,688,804,659 44,188,829 0.0514% 2004 5,003,437,689 77,407,924 140,122 5,080,985,735 47,621,182 0.0513% 2005 5,370,469,396 76,173,121 174,846 5,446,817,363 39,831,091 0.0513% 2006 5,741,564,163 83,223,023 163,090 5,874,950,276 51,408,286 0.0519% $7,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 0 g $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 Net Assessed Value 1997 1996 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Fiscal Year Exempt values are not included in Total Net Taxable Values. The assessed valuation data shown above represents the only data currently available with respect to the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above. Source: Los Angeles County Audi tor/Control ler, Hdl Coren & Cone -94- City of Diamond Bar ' Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates (Rate per $100 of Assessed Value) ' The City has elected to show only one year of data for this schedule. Sources: Hdl Coren & Cone LA County Property Tax Statement -95- Fiscal Year Ended June 30. ' 2006 Direct Rates: 0.05294 City of Diamond Bar basic rate Overlapping Rates: 0.00271 ' Children's Institutional Tuition Fund 0.16936 Consolidated Fire Protection 0.02016 County Lighting Maintenance 0.01221 County Sanitation Dist 21 0.00894 County school service - Walnut Valley 0.00083 Development Ctr Handicapped Minor 0.21072 Educational Augmentation Fund 0.02237 LA County Library 0.00011 LA County Capital Outlay 0.00616 LA County Fire 0.01094 LA County Flood Control 0.24908 LA County General 0.00028 Mt San Antonio Children's Center 0.02926 ' Mt San Antonio Community College Southeast Mosquito Abatement 0.00035 0.00409 Three Valley Municipal Water 0.19057 Walnut Valley Unified School Dist 0.00892 Walnut Valley Water Dist 1.00000 Total Prop. 13 Rate 0.00080 Detention Facilities 1987 Debt 0.00003 ' Flood Control Ref Bonds 1993 0.00002 LA County Flood Control Storm Dist #4 0.02122 Mt San Antonio Ccd Debts of 2001 & 2004 0.00520 Three Valley Municipal Water - 1112 0.09141 ' Walnut Valley Unified School Dist Bonds 0.11868 Total Voter Approved Rate ' Tax Rate for Walnut Valley Unified School District Property Owners 1.11868 0.00092 County 0.00580 Metropolitan Water Dist 0.00025 Flood Control 0.14731 Community College 0.12910 Pomona Unified School Dist Bonds 0.28338 'Tax 1.28338 Rate for Pomona Unified School District Property Owners ' In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13 which sets the property tax rate at a 1.00% fixed amount. This the 1.00% fixed amount, 1.00% is shared property owners by all taxing agencies for which the subject property resides within. In addition to approved bonds for the are charged taxes as a percentage of assessed property values for the payment of any voter in Diamond Bar depending on which school ' Pomona Unified School District or Walnut Valley Unified School Districts district the property is located in. ' The City has elected to show only one year of data for this schedule. Sources: Hdl Coren & Cone LA County Property Tax Statement -95- City of Diamond Bar Top 10 Property Taxpayers Current Year and Nine Years Ago Current Taxpayers 2005-06 Assessed Valuation Hampton Apartments at Diamond Bar $ 34,100,000 Behringer Harvard Western Portfolio 29,441,806 Pacifica Trenton Center 27,300,000 GEM Gateway Limited Inc. 25,768,277 Muller Rock 2 Gateway LLC 1.9,482,061 Margaret M. Tam Trust, Et. Al. 15,923,105 Ari Diamond Bar 15,886,720 J.F. Shea Company Inc. 15,745,649 Emerald Pointe Apartments LLC 15,474,148 H. R. Banos Family Limited Partnership 15,070,875 Percentage of Total Net Assessed Valuation 0.58% 0.50% 0.46% 0.44% 0.33% 0.27% 0.27%n 0.27% 0.26% 0.26% Source: Hdl Coren & Cone. Los Angeles County Assessor 2005/06 combined tax rolls. -96- $ 214,192.641 3.65% 1996-97 Percentage of Total Taxpayers Nine Years Ago Assessed Valuation Net Assessed Valuation Diamond Bar Business Associates $ 29,535,399 0.79% M & H Realty Partners II 20,666,119 0.55% Hidden Manna Corporation 19,000,721 0.51% J.F. Shea Company Inc. 12,168,275 0.33% PGP Inland Communities 11,946,050 0.32%1 Nikko Capital Corporation 11,585,739 0.31% Martin Brattrud Properties 10,686.250 0.29% Lincoln Emerald Pointe 10,562,250 0.28% TCEP II Properties Joint Venture 10,196,519 0.27% Nugit Trust 9,604,613 0.26%n $ 145.951.935 3.91% Source: Hdl Coren & Cone. Los Angeles County Assessor 2005/06 combined tax rolls. -96- City of Diamond Bar Secured Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years (unaudited) Fiscal Year itis+ Ended Total June 30 Current Levy Amount 1997 $ 1,809,197 1998 1,781,264 1999 1,810,266 2000 1,904,915 2001 1,954,530 2002 2,129,310 2003 2,301,716 2004 2,504,974 2005 2,698,515 2006 2,921,267 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 N $2,000,000 c N $1,500,000 c ~ $1,000,000 $500,000 Collected within the itis+ Delinquent & Fiscal Year of Levy Collections in Amount % to Levy Subsequent Years $ 1,625,252 89.83% $ 183,945 1,6801816 94.36% 100,448 1,758,764 97.16% 51,502 1,813,904 95.22% 91,011 1,847,817 94.54% 106,713 2,017,399 94.74% 111,911 2,211,793 96.09% 89,923 2,390,554 95.43% 114,420 21568,064 95.17% 130,450 2,615,545 89.53% 305,722 Total Secured Property Tax Collections 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2uu5 euuo Fiscal Year Source: Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller. - 97 - itis+ 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2uu5 euuo Fiscal Year Source: Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller. - 97 - City of Diamond Bar Direct and Overlapping Debt June 30, 2006 (unaudited) Direct Debt Diamond Bar Lease Revenue Bond Overlapping Debts Los Angeles County Detention Facilities 1987 Debt Svc LA Co Flood Control Storm Dr. D.S. #4 *Metropolitan Water District Three Valley Area 1112 Mt San Antonio Com Col Dis 2001 Ser S-A Mt San Antonio Com Col Dis 2004 Ser B Pomona Unified School District Refund Ser 1997A DS Pomona Unified School District 2002 Ser C DS Pomona Unified SD Refund 2000 Series A Debt Service Pomona Unified SD 1998 Series D Debt Service Pomona Unified SD Refunding 2001 Ser A Debt Service Pomona Unified SD 2002 Ser A Debt Service Pomona Unified School District 2002 Ser B Pomona Unified School District 2002 Ser D Walnut Valley Unified SD Refund Series 1997 A Walnut Valley Unified SD 2000 Series A Walnut Valley Unified SD 2000 Series B Walnut Valley Unified SD 2000 Series C Walnut Valley Unified SD 2000 Series D Walnut Valley Unified SD 2000 Series E Walnut Valley Unified SD 2005 Ref Bonds Total Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt 2005/06 Net Assessed Valuation: $ 5,874,950,276 Debt to Assessed Valuation Ratios: Gross Bonded Deht Ralnnce $ 13,520,000 % Applicable Net Bonded To City Debt 100.000 $ 13,520,000 8,395,000 0.800 67,170 1,080,000 0.812 8,773 182,369,156 0.863 1,574,494 6,710,000 10.667 715,762 22,360,000 10.667 2,385,163 41,610,000 20.688 8,608,272 14,780,000 20.688 3,057,685 19,305,000 20.688 3,993,816 9,435,000 20.688 1,951,912 20,845,000 20.688 4,312,411 9,285,000 20.688 1,920,880 14,365,000 20.688 2,971,829 15,000,000 20.688 3,103,198 36,097,718 57.863 20,887,099 995,000 57.863 575,733 770,000 57.863 445,542 7,570,000 57.863 4,380,203 21,998,11.4 57.863 12,728,693 6,001,837 57.863 3,472,822 11,955,000 57.863 6,917,481 $ 464,446,825 $ 97,598,938 Direct Debt 0.23% Overlapping Debt 1.43% Total Debt 1.66% Report reflects general obligation debt which is being repaid through voter -approved indebtness. It excludes, mortgage revenue, tax allocation bonds, interim financing obligations, non -bonded capital lease obligations and certificates of participation. * This fund is a portion of a larger agency, and is responsible for debt in areas outside the city. Sources: Hdl Coren & Cone City Finance Department 98 C t i i Net assessed value Add back: Exemptions Gross assessed value Conversion percentage Adjusted assessed valuation Debt limit percentage Debt limit City Debts: Revenue bonds Legal debt margin Net assessed value Add back: Exemptions Gross assessed value Conversion percentage Adjusted assessed valuation Debt limit percentage Debt limit City Debts: Revenue bonds Legal debt margin City of Diamond Bar Computation of Legal Debt Margin Last Ten Fiscal Years (unaudited) Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 $ 3,678,278,208 $ 3,677,011,183 $ 3,767,314,142 $ 3.900,751,190 $ 4,125,665,929 27.479,616 37.731,129 38,373,706 36.494,583 40.088,648 3,705.757,824 3,714,742,312 3,805.687,848 3,937,245,773 4,165,754.577 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 926.439,456 928,685,578 15% 15% 138,965,918 139,302,837 951,421,962 984,311,443 1,041.438,644 15% 15% 15% 142,713,294 147,646316 156,215,797 $ 138,965.918 $ 139.302,837 $ 142,713,294 $ 147.646,716 $ 156.215,797 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 $ 4.357,791,664 $ 4,688,804,659 $ 5,080,985,735 $ 5,446,817,363 $ 5,874.950,276 41.869.703 44.188.829 47,621,182 39.831.091 51.408.286 4.399,661,367 4,732,993,488 5,128.606,917 5,486,648,454 5.926,358.562 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%n 1,099,915,342 1,183,248,372 1,282,151,729 1,371.662,114 1.481.589,641 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 164,987.301 177,487,256 192,322.759 205,749,317 222,238.446 13.755.000 13,755,000 13,755,000 13.755,000 13.520.000 $ 151,232.301 $ 163,732.256 $ 178.567,759 $ 191,994.317 $ 208.718,446 The Government Code of the State of Califomia provides for a legal debt limit of 15% of gross assessed valuation. However, this provision was enacted when assessed valuation was based upon 25% of market value. Effective with the 1981-82 fiscal year, each parcel is now assessed at 100% of market value (as of the most recent change in ownership for that parcel). The computations shown above reflect a conversion of assessed valuation data for each fiscal year from the current full valuation the 25% level that was in effect at the time that the legal debt margin was enacted by the State of California for local government located within the state. Sources: Section 43605 of the California Government Code Hdl Coren & Cone City Finance Department -99- City of Diamond Bar Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Calendar Years Per Total Personal Capita Unemployment Calendar Population Employment Income Personal Rate Year (1) (2) (3) Income (3) (4) 1997 56,003 29,500 Unavailable Unavailable 4.70%n 1998 57,271 301.200 Unavailable Unavailable 4.20% 1999 58,300 30,700 $ 68,957 $ 25,472 4.00% 2000 56,287 29,700 71,911 25,500 3.70%n 2001 57,066 30,100 Unavailable Unavailable 3.80% 2002 58,115 29,700 86,741 31.,870 4.90% 2003 58,966 29,900 Unavailable Unavailable 5.10% 2004 59,399 29,900 73,359 28,482 4.70% 2005 59,595 30,700 74,941 28,906 3.60% 2006 59,722 31,400 84,297 29,086 3.20% Sources: (1) State Department of Finance (2) California LaborMarketInfo. Data Library (3) Information provided by the U.S. Census Bureau and Claritas (4) State of California - Labor Market Info - 100- City of Diamond Bar Principal Employers (unaudited) Current Year and Nine Years Ago 2006 "Total Employment" as used above represents the total employment of all employers located within City limits Source: InfoUSA -Government Division - 101 - Number of % of Total Employer Employees Employment South Coast Air Quality Management 750 2.39% 600 1.91% Avnet 450 1.43% Acosta Sales & Marketing 401 1.28% St Paul Travelers 200 0.64% Diamond Bar High School 200 0.64% Lab Support Inc 120 0.38% Baybrook Services 120 038% Goodrich Hoist & Winch 120 0.38% Southwest Patrol 120 0.38% Starside Security & Investigation Biosense Webstar Inc 100 0.32% Century 21 Diamond Realty 100 0.32% 100 0.32% DACOR 100 0.32% Daily Egg Ranches Inc 100 0.32% FTN -West Group 100 0.32% First Mortgage Corp "Total Employment" as used above represents the total employment of all employers located within City limits Source: InfoUSA -Government Division - 101 - Function General government Community development Community services Public works Total Function General government Community development Community services Public works Total City of Diamond Bar Full-time and Part-time City Employees Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 22 23 22 21 24 4 3 5 6 4 13 13 12 41 38 3 3 4 4 4 42 42 43 72 70 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 24 24 25 25 22 4 4 5 7 8 37 38 45 74 77 4 5 6 7 7 69 71 81 113 114 Police services were contracted with the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Departments. Building and safety services were contracted with D & J Municipal Services Inc. Fire services were provided by the County Fire District. Source: City Finance Department - 102- City of Diamond Bar ' Operating Indicators Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Police: (in calendar year) (1) (a) 747 723 817 764 Arrests (a) (a) (a) (a) 2,996 Street Sweeping Parking Citation ' Fire: (in calendar year) (2) (a) (a) (a) (a) 2,647 Number of emergency calls (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Inspections ' Public works: (in fiscal year) (3) (a) (a) 20.6 23.0 24.6 Street resurfacing (miles) Parks and recreation: (in fiscal year) (4) 700 700 740 1,084 1,062 Number of recreation classes 785 785 785 785 785 Number of facility rentals Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 ' Police: (in calendar year) (1) 571 552 481 558 (a) ' Arrests Street Sweeping Parking Citation 7,995 6,662 6,710 5,790 (a) Fire: (in calendar year) (2) 2,666 2,741 2,755 2,615 (a) ' Number of emergency calls (a) (a) 1,206 1,159 (a) Inspections ' Public works: (in fiscal year) (3) Street resurfacing (miles) 19.7 18.5 5.0 18.6 16.8 Parks and recreation: (in fiscal year) (4) 947 915 1,022 1,102 1,376 Number of recreation classes 785 1,021 1,736 4,123 4,305 Number of facility rentals ' Unavailable (a) Sources: (1) Police Walnut/Diamond Bar Station (2) LA County Fire Dept East Regional Operation Bureau (3) City Public Works Department (4) City Community Services Department i103- Agenda: 6.9 Meeting Date: February 6. 2007 CITY COUNCIL \�_ d' AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man g _f TITLE: REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMEN OF $8,000 FROM THE COALITION FOR PRACTICAL REGULATION (CPR) FOR THE TRASH TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) APPEAL LITIGATION RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The request for $8,000 would be funded by the City's Environmental Services budget allocation for FY 2006-2007. BACKGROUND: On June 18th, 2002, the City Council approved Resolution 2002-45 (Attachment A) to authorize the City's participation with the Coalition for Practical Regulation (CPR) in filing of a lawsuit in state court against the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) and the State Water Resources Control Board and a lawsuit in Federal Court against the United States EPA challenging the TMDL for the Los Angeles River. The trash TMDL for the Los Angeles River required that cities and the County reduce the amount of trash in the storm drain system by 10% per year, to "Zero" by the tenth year. It is possible that a "Zero" Trash TMDL will be applied to the San Gabriel River Watershed, which Diamond Bar is a part of, and that the Water Board will attempt to employ similar strict standards for other types of pollutants. The Los Angeles River Trash TMDL litigation has been concluded. The Water Board has been required to complete an environmental impact report (or substitute document) and comply with California Environmental Quality Act. Pagel of 2 DISCUSSION: In September 2003, the CPR's initial litigation funding request was received and the City paid its share of $5,500 towards legal expenses. In June 2005, the City was invoiced an additional $2,000 for ongoing expenses. In November 2006, the City was billed for the final share of $6,000. The summary of payments and invoices are referenced below. Trash TMDL I Invoice Number Date Amn...,+ Previously Paid Total Paid to Date Outstanding Invoice Total Outstanding PREPARED BY: Joyce Lee, Management Analyst REVIE B : David iu Director of Public Works Attachment: A. Resolution No. 2002-45 9/18/2003 5488 6/20/2005 5779 11/11/2006 Page 2 of 2 $2,000 $6,000 $8,000 ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 4 5 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Authorizing the filing of a lawsuit in State Court against the LARWQCB and the SWRCB and a lawsuit in Federal Court against the United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA Challenging the Trash Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Los Angeles River. _ WHEREAS, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ("Board") initially adopted a Trash Total Maximum Daily Load for the Los Angeles River Watershed ("TMDL") on January 25, 2001, but thereafter revised the TMDL and re -adopted it on September 19, 2001; WHEREAS, on February 19, 2002, the State Water Resources Control Board ("State Board") adopted a resolution approving the TMDL adopted by the Regional Board on September 19, 2001, pursuant to California Water Code Section 13245 ("State TAMU). The State TMDL has now been forwarded on to the Office of Administrative Law for review and consideration. If approved by the OAL, it will then be forwarded to the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") for its review and approval; WHEREAS, on March 19, 2002, EPA also established a separate Trash TMDL for the Los Angeles River ("EPA TMDL"). The EPA TMDL is nearly identical to the State TMDL, with the most notable exception being that the EPA TMDL does not include an Implementation Plan; WHEREAS, under both TMDLs, the cities in the Los Angeles County Watershed, will be required to establish programs that inventory the water borne trash in the municipal storm drain system over the next twelve-year period. The cities will also be required to reduce the amount of water borne trash over this same period by 10% per year, until there is "zero" trash coming out of the storm drain systems and entering the Los Angeles River, i.e., a "Zero TMDL"; WHEREAS, both TMDLs require that cities monitor water borne trash for the next two years in order to establish a base line waste load. The base line waste load allocation is to then be used to monitor compliance with the trash reduction mandates in the TIVIDLs, and both TMDLs will require cities to implement programs and capital improvements to reduce the base line waste load by 10% annually, until the cities reach the level of zero trash; WHEREAS, the State and Regional Boards, and EPA (collectively "Agencies"), failed to properly develop the TMDL in accordance with federal guidelines and the requirements of the Clean Water Act and the regulations thereunder, and failed to comply with the requirements of State Law. In addition, the Agencies failed to include requirements and other programs to address trash from "nonpoint sources" and the other "point sources" inclng trash coming from State and federal facilities; and ,including WHEREAS, the Agencies also failed to perform an appropriate fiscal and cost/benefit analysis for the TMDLs,.failed to consider whether the T IDLs' numeric targets are attainable, failed to determine whether they are "suitable for calculation" and based on proper technical .37/065121-0067 156393.03 PMO3 e s o 1 u t i o n No. 2002-45 conditions, and to determine whether the TMDLs are necessary to implement water quality standards for the Los Angeles River; WHEREAS, the Agencies failed to consider the application of the maximum extent practicable ("MEp") standard required under the Clean Water Act, and whether a "zero" trash TMDL can be achieved through compliance with the MEP standard; WHEREAS, the City currently supports and ftlnds efforts to reduce and eliminate storm water pollution. During he five and one half year period of the 1996 MS4 Permit ending on December 13, 2001, the City implemented street sweeping efforts, increased catch basin cleaning, funded a public information program on storm water pollution, implemented construction project inspection programs, implemented the SUSMP program, completed the site visitation programs, initiated waste -oil recycling programs and implemented various other Programs. The City, at a minimum, will be continuing with all of the programs that it was Previously implementing under the 1996 MS4 Permit, and will be implementing additional programs as necessary to comply with the valid terms of the new MS4 Permit adopted on December 13, 2001, as such permit may be modified or revised by the State Board, or by the State or Regional Boards as a result of any Court determination on the validityof such terms; WHEREAS, under the MS4 Permit, the City, along with 83 other incorporated cities in Los Angeles County and the County of Los Angeles, will be required to expand existing storm water treatment programs, and implement new storm water programs, which the Regional Board purports will improve the quality of municipal storm water in a cost-effective manner. However, a cost -benefit study was never performed by the Regional Board to illustrate that the new programs will result in cost-effective improvements to storm water quality. In addition, the Regional Board did not develop or rely upon scientific data to support the need for the numerous programs to be imposed by the new MS4 Permit. A co py of the "Fand Economic Impacts of Storm Water Treatment Los Angeles County,NPDES PermitiA ea" nancial prepard by he California Department of Transportation in November of 1998 was supplied to the Regional Board for its review and consideration ebefo e iissu isport I.D. suing, new MS4 Permit. This Report concluded that to treat storm water to comply with the proposed MS4 Permit and the future Total Maximum Daily Loads would cost over $53.6 billion to construct with an annual operational cost of $198 million. The Report also found that 13,950 acres of new storm water retention facilities would be required, with 480 storm water treatment facilities would orderes. The Report further concluded that annual costs per household for the new treatment facilitis be $1,295, and that property taxes would increase by as much as 70% (a 2 to finance the capital improvements; .06% tax rate) WHEREAS, the Agencies, with the adoption of both TVJDLs, are improperly seeking to shift responsibility under State and federal Law to develop and enforce a trash TMDL on nonpoint sources and other point source dischargers, on to municipalities, and to hold individual cities legally responsible for the actions and inactions of each of its citizens and visitors; WHEREAS, the Coalition for Practical Regulation ("Coalition"), a coalition of 42 or more Los Angeles County cities, presented a cost-effective alternative trash reduction plan ("Coalition Alternative") to the Regional Board, which was designed to recognize the financial constraints placed upon the cities in implementing the TNIDLs. The Coalition Alternative 227/065121-0067 156393.03 PM02 -2- Resolution No. 2002-45 rf . permitted cities to form regional problem solving ' g groups, with Los Angeles County and other government agencies, to implement cost-effective trash reductionro P grams; requested that the "Zero TMDL" be a "goal" WHEREAS, the Coalition and others, including the City and the County of Los Angeles I not a legal mandate imposed on cities, to avoid making cities liable for the actions of all individuals and visitors to the County. These requests to make the TNIDLs goals only, were rejected by the Agencies. Thus, as a legally enforceable mandate against the cities, the cities will be subjected to $27,500 in fines per day, per violation, and to third party litigation, should the cities fail to achieve the trash reduction limits TMDL in any particular year; in the WHEREAS, the Coalition and other members of thepublic to State and Regional Boards and submitted extensive comments to EPA, explain ngstimony the de ectsthe of the TMDLs and the financial crisis created if the .cities were required to allocate potentially billions of dollars to fund the new programs over the next dozen years, and to incur hundreds of millions of dollars thereafter; WHEREAS, the Coalition requested that the State and Regional Boards follow the Procedures outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which require that the Regional Board examine the potential significant adverse environmental impacts from the TMDL on existing City services, such as public safety, public works and other municipal programs, but the Regional Board failed to do so; WHEREAS, the State and Regional Boards further failed to discuss the Coalition Alternative and failed to amend the TMDLs to incorporate any portion of the Coalition Alternative. These Boards also refused to adequately address the impacts of the TNIDLs on the environment and on other governmental services; WHEREAS, the Office of Administrative Law is to consider the appropriateness of the State Board approved TMDL, to determine whether it complies with the requirements of "necessity," "authority," "clarity," "consistency, reference," and "non -duplication," as defined under Government Code Section 11349 et seq.; WHEREAS, pursuant to a prior agreement with the California Attorney General's office, if the Office of Administrative Law approves the TMDL approved by the State and Regional Boards, the City will have thirty (30) days in which to seek relief in State Court to challenge the TNIDL in that it does not comply with the Clean Water Act or State law, including on the grounds that it does not comply with the requirements of CEQA; WHEREAS, the EPA TMDL was developed pursuant to a Consent Decree approved in that action entitled Heal the Bay, et al. v. Browner et al. USDC Case No. C 98-4825 SBA. This Consent Decree mandated deadlines for the adoption of some 90L for for the Los Angeles Region, but did so without input from the County of Los Angeles, or any cities within the County, and without any opportunity for the public to comment on the Consent Decree; WHEREAS, the stated purpose of the Consent Decree is to provide a mechanism by which certain remedies will be implemented "without delay," including the establishment of the numerous TNIDLs for the' Los Angeles Region, through an expedited schedule, irrespective of 337/065121-0067 156393.03 PM03 -3- Resolution 2002-45 the schedule and process to be followed under the Clean Water Act or under State law for the proper development of TMDLs; and with the requirements of the Clean Water Act, the Federal and State AWHEREAS, the actions taken by the Agencies in adopting the TMDLs are inconsistent Acts, and other State law, including CEQA, and will result in the impdministrative Procedures osition of unsupportable programs and unfunded mandates. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, resolves as follows: SECTION 1. To participate with the Coalition in the filing of an action in Federal District Court challenging the TMDL approved by EPA, and, as appropriate, challenging the terms of the Consent Decree which led to EPA's adoption of the TMDL, including providing any requisite pre -litigation notice as may be necessary under federal law. SECTION 2. To participate with the Coalition in challenging, in California Superior Court, the State and Regional Board's approval of the TMDL and any improprieties in the actions taken or to be taken by the Office of Administrative Law. SECTION 3. That Richard Montevideo, Esq., be retained to advise, assist, and represent the City in his representation of the Coalition in challenging the Agencies actions as set forth above. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18 t1JDAy OF June 2002. Resolution ABSENT: I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do :ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the -il of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the 18 th ane , 2002, by the following vote: COUNCIL, MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Huff, Zirbes, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang None None None 4yvnda, Burgess, City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar Resolution Agenda: 6.10 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL �� �� " / AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man . TITLE: REQUEST FOR $6,000 FROM TH COALITION FOR PRACTICAL REGULATION (CPR) FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT LITIGATION RECOMMENDATION: Deny. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2003, Diamond Bar joined with the Coalition for Practical Regulation (CPR) cities to challenge the Municipal Storm Water Permit (Order No. 01- 182) as reflected in Council Resolution No. 2003-01 (Attachment A). In June 2006, the City joined the unified, consensus renewal application with the County of Los Angeles. CPR submitted a letter, dated June 6, 2006, to the Water Board stating that the cities in CPR are joining the County renewal application but are opting out of certain portions of that application. This letter serves as an administrative record that will allow the CPR cities to preserve their rights to the pending legal actions. The Municpal Storm Water Permit expired on December 12, 2006. However, this permit is still in effect until replaced by the new permit. The Appellate Court has concluded the NPDES Permit litigation. The Court has required that the Regional Board comply with California Environmental Quality Act. The State and Regional Boards have requested a rehearing by the Appellate Court. DISCUSSION: In February 2003, the CPR's initial litigation funding request was received and the City paid its share of $3,000 towards anticipated legal expenses. In February 2004, the City paid an additional share of $3,600 for ongoing expenses. In August 2004, the City paid Page 1 of 3 its supposed final share of $3,000. It is noted that all previous litigation funding requests were divided among 31 of the 43 CPR member cities that joined at the time. In March 2005, CPR requested additional funds, in the amount of $4,000 per city, to acquire closure on some outstanding issues relating to the NPDES Permit and to pursue an appeal. On May 17, 2005 Council approved the payment of $4,000. Subsequently in August 2005, CPR invoiced the City in the amount of $5,000 instead of the $4,000. Based on Council's approval on May 17, 2005, only $4,000 was paid. Furthermore on August 2, 2005 the City signed a condition to the appeal on a maximum payment of $4,000 (Attachment B). To date, the City has contributed $13,600 towards the litigation. In November 2006, CPR requested for another $5,000 for additional legal expenses on behalf of the CPR cities that joined the litigation (22 of the 43 member) due to a rehearing by the Appellate Court. As the CPR moves through the process, more costs are likely to be incurred. The summary of payments and invoices are referenced below. NPDES Permit Appeal Invoice # Date Amount Note Previously Paid 2/27/2003 $3,000 4/8/2004 $3,600 8/16/2004 $3,000 5548 8/9/2005 $4,000 Paid $4,000 of $5,000 Total Paid to Date $13,600 Outstanding Invoice 5548 8/9/2005 $1,000 Remaining out of $5,000 5756 11/1/2006 $5.000 Total Outstanding CONCLUSION: $6,000 The City conditioned its participation in the appeal on a flat fee basis or a maximum payment of $4,000 on August 2, 2005. The additional invoices requested after this date should not be paid. PREPARED BY: Joyce Lee, Management Analyst REVIEW Da ' G. Liu Director of Public Works Attachments: A. Resolution No, 2003-01 B. City's signed agreement ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 2003-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE STORM WATER/URBAN RUNOFF PERMIT FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE INCORPORATED CITIES THEREIN, EXCEPT THE CITY OF LONG BEACH (NPDES NO. CAS004001) WHEREAS, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ("Regional Board") adopted Order No. 01-182, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles and the incorporated cities therein, except the City of Long Beach (hereinafter "NPDES Permit") on December 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, in January of 2002, forty-nine cities, including the City of Los Angeles, as well as the County of Los Angeles, filed administrative petitions with the State Water Resources Control Board ("State Board") challenging the validity of the NPDES Permit on a number of grounds, including its deletion of the "Safe Harbor" provisions that existed in the prior 1996 NPDES Permit, the modifications to the terms of the Permit dealing with Receiving Water Limitations and the requirement therein that would allow "numeric" limits to be imposed upon municipalities (without compliance with the "maximum extent practicable" standard set forth in the Clean Water Act), as well as those provisions allowing for the automatic incorporation of total maximum daily loads ("TMDL") by the Regional Board's Executive Officer, the failure of the Regional Board to comply with the requirements of CEQA or to adopt terms consistent with CEQA, the imposition of additional inspection obligations on municipalities for various industrial and commercial facilities, and the attempt by the Regional Board to rollback the changes that had been made to the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements ("SUSMP Requirements") by the State 1 2003-01 Board, along with other objectionable terms, including various provisions which infringe upon the local land use authority of the Cities; and WHEREAS, although indicating in February of 2002 that it would address a number of substantive issues raised by the administrative petitions, on December 18, 2002, after three settlement negotiation sessions that did not lead to a resolution of the issues, the State Board denied all of the administrative petitions without providing a hearing to the public, and concluded that the Petitions "failed to raise substantial, new issues;" and WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar ("City") currently supports and funds efforts to reduce and eliminate storm water pollution. During the five year period of the prior NPDES Permit, the City implemented additional street sweeping efforts, increased catch basin cleaning, funded a public information program on storm water pollution, implemented construction project inspection programs, implemented a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (the "SUSMP") as modified by the State Board, completed the site visitation programs, initiated waste -oil recycling programs and implemented various other storm water programs; and WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit contains various language within the Receiving Water Limitations section (and other provisions of the Permit) which violate the "maximum extent practicable" standard, and which in many cases, directly or indirectly seek to impose responsibility on municipalities throughout the County, to insure that storm water runoff into and from their storm drain systems, does not violate water .quality objectives, including numeric effluent limits that may be adopted through the incorporation of TMDLs; and E 2003-01 f ` WHEREAS, under the NPDES Permit, the City, along with 83 other incorporated cities in Los Angeles County and the County of Los Angeles, are required to expand existing storm water treatment programs, and to implement new storm water programs which the Regional Board purports will improve the quality of municipal storm water in a cost-effective manner. However, a cost -benefit study was never performed by the Regional Board to illustrate that the new programs will result in cost- effective improvements to storm water quality. In addition, the Board did not develop or rely upon scientific data to support the need for the numerous programs to be imposed by the new Permit; and WHEREAS, under the new NPDES Permit, the City will" be responsible for implementing a comprehensive inspection and surveillance program of industrial and commercial facilities to "control' storm water and non -storm water runoff from these facilities. A recent study ordered by the United States Congress and completed by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences recommended that storm water programs utilize "adaptive implementation", and recognized that cities should not be subjected to fines and legal action while they are developing new and untested storm water programs. The new NPDES Permit may place the Cities in a constant state of violation, and will subject all municipalities covered by the Permit to needless lawsuits by environmental organizations, and exposing the Cities to excessive fines. The removal of the legal "Safe Harbor," combined with the addition of language putting the Cities in a constant state of violation, is legally inappropriate and fundamentally unfair; and WHEREAS, the revised SUSMP Requirements under the new NPDES Permit are contrary to a prior order issued by the State Board, and require the imposition of mitigation measures that are contrary to existing State law under the California Environmental Quality Act, and the 3 Permit terms infringe upon traditional local land use authority and the basic powers of local governments; WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit goes beyond the intent of the Clean Water Act, and violates the California Porter -Cologne Act, by "micro managing" and dictating specific programs and a particular manner of compliance on the Cities, and by imposing requirements that are not authorized anywhere under State or federal law; and WHEREAS, the new NPDES Permit requires that the Cities expand the current private property site visitation and education program to a mandatory inspection and enforcement program, that the Cities reduce pollutants in runoff from private industrial and commercial facilities (including federal and State facilities) and that the Cities modify their CEQA Guidelines and their General Plan requirements. All such requirements and programs are being mandated on the Cities, without any provision for State funding. WHEREAS, the actions taken by the Regional Board in adopting the NPDES Permit are inconsistent with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and State Law, will result in the imposition of unsupportable programs on the City and its citizenry, and will result in the imposition of numerous unfunded mandates on the City. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, FOLLOWS: DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS Section 1. To participate with other Cities in the County with the filing of a lawsuit challenging Regional Board Order No. 01-182, NPDES Permit No. CAS004001, Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal rd Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles and the Incorporated Cities therein, except the City of Long Beach. Section 2. To retain Richard Montevideo, Esq., in coordination with other -.Los Angeles County Cities, to advise, assist and represent the City in the filing and in the prosecution of a lawsuit challenging Regional Board Order No. 01-182, the Municipal NPDES Permit for Los Angeles County and the incorporated Cities therein, except the City of Long Beach. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council this 7th day of January 2003. Carol Herrera, Mayor 5 2003•-Ol I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 7ch day of January, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, O'Connor, zirbes, MPT/Huff, M/Herrera NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None LYNDA BURGESS, ity Clerk City of Diamond Bar 2 U. AN C ER 3 ♦! I lI N N[ v 5 A[ L♦ �V Mr. Javier Peraza August 1, 2005 Page 6 ATTACHMENT "B" The City is only agreeable to participating financially in the appeal on a flat fee basis, regardless of the cost incurred based on the Firm's hourly rates. The City will contribute a maximum of $4,000 towards prosecution of the appeal through the California Court of Appeal. In the event that additional payments of fees or costs in excess of $4,000 are sought, the City Council would need to consider contributing additional funds and may or may not agree to support the matter further. I have read and understood the contents of this letter and consent to Rutan & Tucker, LLP representing the City on the matters and terms set forth above. Dated: 0 b/ 0 a/ 0 5 227/065121-0068 620264.01 407/26/05 � i� _ ' �.11.'...rl✓ City Manal CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6 1 1 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mana e TITLE: RESCIND RESOLUTION NO. 200 0 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -XX APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 61702, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A 13.69 ACRE SITE (TARGET DEVELOPMENT) INTO THREE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND GRAND AVENUE. RECOMMENDATION: Rescind Resolution No. 2007-04 and adopt Resolution No. 2007 -XX and direct the City Clerk to certify and process the map for recordation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact to the City. BACKGROUND: The Tentative Map application was made to the Planning Commission by Target Corporation d/b/a Target Stores at a duly noticed public hearing on March 28, 2006 at which time the item was continued to the April 11, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. At the April 11, 2006 meeting, the Planning Commission concluded its review of the application and adopted Resolution No. 2006-15 approving the Tentative Parcel Map No. 61702. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this tentative map application on May 16, 2006 and adopted Resolution No. 2006-46 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 61702. The City Council considered this item at the January 16, 2007 regular meeting and conditionally approved the map subject to a condition of approval from Resolution No. 2006-46 requiring that an underground Southern California Edison easement through the subject property be executed by Edison and Target before February 6, 2007. Failure to execute the easement by the said date will in effect cause the conditional approval to be null and void. The map is hereby being reconsidered for conditional approval as the easement remains unexecuted to date. The Resolution includes the similar language conditionally approving the map subject to the execution of the easement by February 20, 2007. DISCUSSION: The conditions of approval require that certain on and offsite improvements be constructed for this development. All public and private improvements conditioned for the Target Development have been completed to date. In addition to the surety posted for the improvements of the development at the time of permit issuance, a fair share contribution in the amount of $541,451 for traffic mitigations and the traffic impact fee of $351,565 for off-site improvements are required to be paid to the City. To date, Target has paid the $351,565 for off-site improvements that were completed along Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive. In addition, Target has paid $406,088.26 of the fair share costs associated with the development of the Target Store. The remainder ($135,362.74) of the fair share costs will be paid with the development of the two remaining pads. Any development associated with the two pads (parcels 2 and 3 of this map) will undergo a separate development review process with the Planning Commission. The Final Parcel Map subdivides 13.69 acres of into three (3) parcels. The largest of the three parcels is currently occupied by the Target Store. The two smaller parcels are intended to be sold for commercial/restaurant uses that will provide additional sales tax revenues, jobs to the City and quality of life to the Diamond Bar Community. The Final Parcel Map 61702 has been reviewed by the appropriate agencies and has been found to be technically correct and conforms substantially to the approved tentative parcel map. Furthermore the final map meets the requirements of the conditions of approval. PREPARED BY: Kimberly Molina, Associate Engineer Date Prepared: January 31, 2007 REVIEWED BY: Davidiu, Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 2007 -XX Parcel Map 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 61702, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A 13.69 ACRE SITE INTO THREE PARCELS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND GRAND AVENUE IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04 IN ITS ENTIRETY RECITALS (i) On March 28, 2006 the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of Target Corporation d/b/a Target 1000 Nicollet Mall, TPN -13A, Minneapolis, MN 55403 (the "Applicant' hereinafter) for approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 61702 at which time the item was continued to the April 11, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting, and upon conclusion of said public hearing on April 11, 2006 the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 2006-15 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 61702. (ii) On May 16, 2006 the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider Tentative Parcel Map No. 61702 and, upon conclusion of said public hearing on May 16, 2006 the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 2006-46 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 61702. (iii) On July 17, 2006 the Applicant filed an application for approval of Final Parcel Map No 61702 (the "Application" hereinafter), as described in the title of this Resolution. (iv) Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 21.22.090, the City Engineer has reviewed Final Parcel Map No. 61702 and determined that the map is technically correct, conforms to the approved Tentative Parcel Map and is in compliance with applicable provisions of Title 21 of the Municipal Code and of the Subdivision Map Act. (v). All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2007-04 in its entirety; and 2. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct. 3. Pursuant to Section 21.22.100 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code, the City Council finds the Final Parcel Map to be in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map, with Title 7, Division 2, Chapter 3 of the California Government Code and with the applicable provisions of Title 21 of the Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing finding, the Council hereby conditionally approves Final Parcel Map 61702; the map shall not be signed or stamped approved or released for recordation until and unless the Southern California Edison underground easement is executed; and, further, that if the Southern California Edison underground easement is not executed on or before February 20, 2007, this conditional approval will be deemed void and of no effect; and, further, that the final map be rescheduled for approval by the Council at such time as the easement is executed. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to Target Corporation d/b/a Target 1000 Nicollet Mall, TPN -13A, Minneapolis, MN 55403 11 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 2007. Steve Tye, Mayor I, Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 6th day of February, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAINED COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar S PARCEL O.61702SHEET 1 OF 4 RES IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND EAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCELS 1, 2 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14819, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 154 PAGES 27 TO 30 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND ALSO SHOWN AS PARCEL "A" ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 05-001 EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 3, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT N0, 05-1845648 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PFEILER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. MARK P. PFEILER. MARCH 2006. S STATEMENT UNDERSIGNED, BEING ALL PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN )S INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE IE BORDER LINES AND WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC USE ALL STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND JEIUC WAYS AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. TARGET CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION. G c-AtIFe 2 A m, AAasolei )F S.S. BEFORE ME7y�q�il���v LY APPEARED_15fU2_________________ PERSONALLY D ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE ;ON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND EDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY FXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR ED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE NT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) KECUTED THE iNSIRUMENT. MY HAND holary PuUll �r. '178LIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE. MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS h4e.A,4.126A-, --I COUNTY, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: S.S. BEFORE ME--rkw ,�, LY APPEARED__,R--c,,,, f -i c�, e, _____ PERSONALLY ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) 10 BE ON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND -.DGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR _D CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE qT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) (ECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. MY HAND: LICU C I f RSAI STATE. MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS--hCOUNTY. i MY COMMISSI N EXPIRES: J ETD SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UP( FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF TARGET CORPORATION ON M 2006. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIAIJY CONFORMS TO APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY; THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN PLAC WILL BE IN PLACE WITHIN TWENTY FOUR MONTHS FROM THE FILING DATE OF T MAP; THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED AND THAT TIF NOTES TO ALL CENTERLINE MONUMENTS SHOWN "TO E SET" WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF' THE CITY ENGINEER WITHIN TWENTY MONTHS FROM THE FILING DATE SHOWN HEREON. SAO LAND Spp` fj. M.RK P. PFE. ILER L.S.Ls. 5959 MARK P. PFEILER .S. 5959 DATE sl+Ekp tt-34p�e EXPIRES: 12-31-0 aF cn� CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND THAT IT CONFORM`. WITH THE MAPPING PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND I AM SATISI SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. MICHAEL L. NAV.ARRO L DATE W.7ME P.L.S. 7848 EXPIRATION DATE: 12 -31 -08 - CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP; THAI IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THERE THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF' SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND' I APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT SECT 66450 (a) (1) (2) AND (3) HAVF BEEN COMPLIED WITH.. DAVID G. LIU DATE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR R.C.E. NO- 44053 EXPIRATION DATE: 5 -30 -07 - SIGNATURE OMISSIONS THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIO SECTION 66436 (a) (3) (A) (i -viii) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THEIR INTER SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLII UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1911 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 135, IN BOOK 4706, PAGE 125 OF DEEDS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND E FOR STORM DRAIN AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED AUGUST 18, 1976 A' INSTRUMENT NO. 2908 IN BOOK D4805, PAGE 762 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, COU OF LOS ANGELES, THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN, INPI?FQS FCRFCC AMn IAU`IfIFMTAI PIIPPl1QGQ DCP PAPrn KIAD — 1no,n ini S PARCEL MAP61702sEiEErzoF4 RES IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PFEILER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. MARK P. PFEIL.ER MARCH 2006. BOUNDARY AND MAP SHEET DATA FD. BRASS DISK, IN WELL MONUMENT, DN. 6" PER LACO FB 4408/23, ACCEPTED AS C.L. INT. / FD. SPIKE & WASHER, STAMPED --- / GAL TRANS, FLUSH, PER LACO FB 4408/22. ACCEPTED A5 B.G.C� t� V \ Q�J / ®ti y$0 �6 N4T3J'44'W A9O/\fir RADIAL E ysa•z1's7"w �,b� ��/ \ qui ZINGS RADIAL --� n / CTS 4' N5TOD'29'W ,,'S S \ \ �• _—RADiAL— ,5/ \2�! _ SEE AQB � o SHEET 4 3 ,�. QH0p4r Q � a O �+ N62'30'O5'W RADIAL ESHER, FLUSH, PER~ \ PARCEL 3 L408/22, TIES / u 0.69 ACRES I AS E.C. / C11— A 26.93' L19 Ct .c8 Nss»�3, l8 i cp / fly / Q / � / Qu. LEGEND INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED. O INDICATES 1' IRON PIPE IN DIRT OR LEAD, TACK & TAG CONCRETE OR SPIKE & WASHER IN ASPHALT, ALL MARK 5959, TO BE SET WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF THE FILING 01 PARCEL MAP. ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP NO. 14.819, 154 / 27-30. INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED I MAP_ BAS.I.S_ OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF NORTH 37.07'37" EAST ON THE INVERSED CEN - BEARING FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLD[ SPRINGS DRIVE TO THE END OF CURVE ON GOLDEN SPRINGS OR SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 14819, BOOK 154, PAGES 27-30 PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF 1'HE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STA" CALIFORNIA, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS. EASEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS V' j.A9 'b01.,ylJ �. PARCEL 2 1.02 ACRES/ GRAND AVENUE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR s C4 1// .9 SCALE: 1"=100' ( / I Ilj C17 SEE \ 2. ti DETAIL 'B• �9• °i SHEET 4 o \\ y "all S,, G S :RES PARCEL MAP NO. 1SHEET 3OF4 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PEEILER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. MARK P. PFEILER MARCH 2006. EASEMENT LOCATION SHEET EASEMENTS WIDE EASEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND -NTAL PURPOSES PER INST. NO. 135 IN BOOK 4706, PACE 125 OF DEEDS, RECORDED /1911. CENTERLINE LOCATION PLOTTED HEREON IS THE LOCATION OF A CENTERLINE PASSING JGH EKISTING TOWERS. WIDE EASEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF LDS ANGFLES FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES PER INST. :908 IN BOOK D4805, PAGE 762 O.R., RECORDED 8/18/1976. US EASEMENTS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN AND STORM DRAIN SS AND EGRESS AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 14019, P.M.B. 154 / 27-30. YSEMENT FOR SLOPE PURPOSES PER INST. NO. 83-237794 AND NO- 83-237795 O.R., iDED 3/2/1983. iSEMENT OF WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR WATER 1_I14ES AND UTILITIES PER INST. NO. D237D3 O.R., RECORDED 9/4/1985, GEMENT OF HIDDEN MANNA COPORATION AND LEWIS DIAMOND BAR, LLC FOR PASSAGE AND d MODATION OF PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES PER INST. N0. 05--2067632 O.R., RECORDED /2005. WIDE EASEMENT OF VER20N CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITES PER INST. NO. 06-826698 RECORDED 4/14/2006: WIDE FASFMENT OF SOU-HFRN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR PIPELINES PER INST. NO. 207644 O.R., RECORDED 6/1/2006. GEMENT OF SOUTHEP.N CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR OVERHEAD ELECTRICIAL & UNICATION SUPPLY SYSTEMS PER INST. NO. 06--1441523 O.R., RECORDED 6/29/2006. SALE: 1"=100' DATA p� h?i PpYP� C36 260.00" " 61 C37 256.00' " 8P_ C38 12.50' " 19 / — 1 C39 12.50' C40 400.00' 21 " 13 429*23'29" C41. 400.00' " 20C42 BRASS DISK, IN WELL MONUMENT, 1 NO REF. ACCEPTED AS C.L INT. ` 400.00' " 12FD. C43 268.56' 0" 59 C44 116.00' 44'06'08" 89 FD. SPIKE Q WASHER, STAMPED CAL TRANS, FLUSH, NO REF. E ACCEPTED AS B.C. k1 kh h53a V�P� �/ / eA \y Prva ahs y°titi / � ' v\j' �\�!y .. �\'Lp by%/1p9.♦\�.y9 6 �% ,V'SD'' poF','S eNi/�D i./ . ��ti.titi Oj / e.6 / 1 /ONO, qJ. `9 ��`? �,b ad ,iL, v/06 // 1,yg 1 \ \ \S3• \ C31 \ PARCEL 2 v 9h/ �p� 135 I \/ k p0 I IIIc N870T 1 TW 297 C27 L41I 3 1_ L,. _9 _ � yy \\ 30 2 NSI```' CYC. Q 28 II 9 5 1 '% } C25 0/ '�" 7 '/�C3 ���` C24 \ Ls RES PARCEL MAP NO. 17 ®2 SHEET 4 OF 4 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. E� N hT �PV�P 0/ 0 `" R=1147.E 1' C 1 \'\\02" sd'S' P "O � n / PARCEL 2 SW'LY LINE OF INST. N0. INST. 95-1383206 O.R. REC. 141 O.R. 8/24/95. DETAIL "A" N.T.S. PFEILER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. MARK P. PFEILER MARCH 2006. DETAIL SHEET / SW'LY LINE OF INST. NO. / 05-1361141 O.R. REC. j6/10/05. SW'LY LINE OF INST. N ------ 95-1383206 O./95-1383206 O.R. REC. �. 8/24/95. r , `?oar / \ 5'L/oO�P GRAND AVENUE TO TO THE CITY OF DIN N62 28'1 PARCEL 2 N.42'10'53"E. C3 C.L. OF BN. 4]06/175 DDS -` I ESTA9US 1HE0 8Y CENTER OF TOWERS.\ s, N6roTn W - 297.09' _ ✓ ^sP WILY LINE OF INST. NO, �� C4 05-1361141 O.R. REC, 6/10/05. ba. _ `gam DETAIL °E° \ ; / ary 3 BELOW ,2S'S N56'08'11 Ro3 A^ RADIAL \ ( V NSR 508'68 IAL 1.Sa.. W C5 1.50' �---_ J h 3'45" 9, ^J WILY LINE OF INST. N0. OS -1361141 O.1, (� L" 1 64) /0'9.0 /Q7 ,5'10�1,L j O�� �o � REC�10/O5. J� 2rL 9khry ^6 4� i, Y FD. 2" I.P., RCE 14814, �'� Gbh 1�0 FLUSH, PER TRACT NO. 0°p �ry - 42536, ACCEPTED AS E.C. Q NOT A PART yati `gam DETAIL °E° \ ; / ary 3 BELOW �\ �C27 \ S/ RADIAL 03"W NO2'O 1'22"E p^ RADIAL �s y00, 90 PARCEL 1 A` DETAIL "B" N.T.S. m m, a^ N 0 62. FD. SPIKE & WASHER,— % Z'o FLUSH, PER LACO ENG. FR 4408/22, q TIES GONE, ACCEPTED Q' AS E.C. C11-" tj NB: a q� 2/ Q, 16' NOT A PART PARCEL N6S�. N6S. cl' ' 4l�,ipk, d o44• CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda # 6.12 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 AGENDA REPORT FROM: James DeStefano, City Man g TITLE: Award of Contract to Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. in the amount of $46,600 for Infrastructure Valuation and Asset Management System in Accordance with GASB34. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: An appropriation of $60,000 has been included in the City's adopted FY06-07 General Fund budget for this purpose. BACKGROUND: In 1999, the Government Accounting Standard Board (GASB) issued GASB34. This pronouncement established a whole new financial reporting framework or governmental financial reporting model, for state and local governments. The timing of the implementation of GASB34 was based on an entity's total annual revenues. The City implemented all provisions of GASB 34 as required in FY2002-2003 with the exception of the retroactive reporting of infrastructure assets. Since this is such a large undertaking, GASB 34 allowed governments extra time to complete this task. According to the schedule this must be completed this fiscal year. DISCUSSION: To accomplish this task a staff committee composed of the Public Works Director, Community Services Director and Finance Director was formed. A request for proposal (RFP) was released in October 2006 and the City received proposals from five firms. The proposals were reviewed and evaluated based on 1) general responsiveness to the City's RFP, 2) staff and firm experience and qualifications, 3) approach/methodology, 4) hours and expected staff assistance, 5) ability to meet the City's schedule and expectations, and 6) references. After review of the proposals, staff determined that four of the five proposals were responsive to the RFP. Staff then conducted interviews with the four responsive firms. The following is a listing of the responsive firms and their respective fee proposal amounts: Firm Name Proposed Fee Bureau Veritas, Berryman & Henigar $39,850 Plus Mileage & Other Expenses G K and Associates $39,900 Norris Repke $44,000 Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. $46,600 In consideration of the criteria stated above, staff concurred that the most qualified firm for this project is Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. Although all of the firms interviewed appeared to be knowledgeable of the GASB 34 requirements, the experience and depth of knowledge Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. best matches the needs of the City of Diamond Bar. Their proposal emphasized their familiarity with various sources of information within the City. This along with their knowledge of City assets will help them design and implement a system that will meet the needs of the City as well as be fully compliant with GASB34. Also included in their proposal is limited future consultation and on-going support services. Therefore staff recommends that the City Council award a contract to Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. in the amount of $46,600 for an Infrastructure Valuation and Asset Management System in accordance with GASB 34. PREPARED BY: Linda Magnuson Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Finance 6ir6l6tor Assistant City Manager CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2007, between the City of Diamond Bar, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") and -Advanced Infrastructure Management ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide consulting services to City as set forth in Exhibit "A". B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "A" titled "Proposal for Infrastructure Valuation and Asset Management System in Accordance with GASB34", dated November 27, 2006. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as set forth in Exhibit "A". 2. Term of Agreement. This contract shall take effect February 7,2007 and shall continue until completion of the project unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A." Payment will be made only after submission of proper invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $46,600. 4. General Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 5. Addresses. City: City Manager James DeStefano Consultant: City of Diamond Bar Yazdan T. Emarani, P.E. 21825 East Copley Drive Advanced Infrastructure Management Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 601 South Valencia Ave., Ste 250 Brea, CA 92823 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain, as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. B. Consultant agrees to pay all required taxes in amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consultant and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all work at the standard of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar conditions. 8. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify the city, its officers, agents, volunteers, employees, and attorneys against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the acts, errors or omissions of Consultant, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, including each person or entity responsible for the provision of services hereunder. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several. 9. Insurance. A. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; and (4) workers' compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater. City, its officers, employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automotive liability. The policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automobile liability shall provide that they are primary, and that any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess insurance only. B. All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non - renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof. Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage. C. All policies of insurance shall cover the obligations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; shall be issued by an insurance company which is admitted to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by the City; and shall be placed with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A VII. D. Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum workers' compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement," or a substantially similar form which the City has agreed in writing to accept. 10. Confidentiality. Consultant, in the course of its duties, may have access to confidential data of City, private individuals, or employees of the City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant prepares reports of a proprietary nature specifically for and in connection with certain projects, the City shall not, except with Consultant's prior written consent, use the same for other unrelated projects. 11. Ownership of Materials. All materials provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. 12. Conflict of Interest. A. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. B. Consultant covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of hardware or software to City as a result of the performance of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 13. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon fifteen (15) days' written notice to the other party. However, Consultant shall not terminate this Agreement during the provision of services on a particular project. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the fifteenth (15th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, City agrees to pay consultant for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue performing services. 14. Personnel. Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Consultant reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right, for good cause, to require Consultant to exclude any employee from performing services on City's premises. 15. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Consultant shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of City relating thereto. Such non-discrimination shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 16. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, and any attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. 17. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall meet with Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, City may direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. 18. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal of equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 21. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile before or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designated in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 22. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 23. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supercedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 25. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Consultant: Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. 601 S. Valencia Ave., Suite 250 Brea, CA 92823 as Consultant By: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk Steve Tye, Mayor Approved as to Form: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Proposal for Infrastructure Valuation and Asset Management System in Accordance with GASB34. FROM :AIM FAX NO. Feb. 02 2007 03:57PM P2 such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designated in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 22. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 23. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supercedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 25. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. City" Consultant: Advanced Infrastructure Management, Inc. 601 S_ Valencia Ave., Suite 250 Brea, CA 92823 By: Consultant By: I I —By: Tominye Abbins, City Clerk Approved as to Form: By: City Attorney Steve Tye, Mayor CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 7 , 1 Meeting Date: February 6 2007 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mang TITLE: Consideration of General Plan A endment No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2006-03, Development Agreement 2005-01, Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Vesting Tentative Tract No. 063623, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-01, Development Review No. 2005-27 and Tree Permit No. 2005-06, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 21) and Development Code (Title 22, Sections 22.22, 22.38, 22.48, 22.58, 22.60, 22, 22.70, and 22.62). The proposed project consists of a 99 -unit single- family residential subdivision, a public park and open space areas on approximately 34.52 acres, located on property south of Larkstone Dr., east of Morning Sun Ave., west of Brea Canyon Rd., and northwest of Peaceful Hills Rd. (Related File: Environmental Impact Report No. 2005-01). CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 19, 2006 AND JANUARY 16, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council open the and continue the hearing to February 20, 2007. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: public hearing, receive additional public testimony On January 16, 2007, the City Council opened the continued public hearing and received additional public testimony regarding the above-described project. The Council, at the request of staff with the concurrence of the applicant, continued the hearing to February 6, 2007. The applicant's consultant is updating the traffic information. For this reason, staff and the applicant, request Council continue the pubs hearing to -February 20, 2007. �M Prepared y ancy ong, AICP Reviewed By ave Doyle Communit evelo ent Director Assistant City Manager Attachment 1. Letter from Applicant requesting continuance Continued Public Hearing Page 1 of 1 Nancy Fong From: Kurt Nelson [knelson@jcchomes.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:44 PM To: Nancy Fong Cc: Steve Schwartz Subject: Continued Public Hearing Nancy, We concur that on Feb.6, the public hearing should continue, with any further input taken, and that the matter should then be further continued to the Feb. 20, 2007 Council hearing. Kurt Nelson JCCL So. Pointe West, LLC 1/31/2007 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 7.2 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man TITLE: Consideration of Comprehensive ign Program No. 2006-04, Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01 and Variance No. 2006-04, pursuant to the Development Code Title 22, Sections 22.36.060, 22.58, and 22.54. The proposed project consists of a comprehensive sign program for the Country Hills Towne Center, a variance to reduce the required monument sign setback from property line, and a conditional use permit for modifications to an existing nonconforming pylon sign. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing hearing, the City Council should deliberate on the merits of the Commission and staff recommend that the Council adopt the approving the project. BACKGROUND: After the conclusion of the public proposed project. The Planning attached Resolution No. 2007 -XX A Comprehensive Sign Program is typically approved by the Planning Commission. However, in approving the Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-01 in December 2005 for the Country Hills Towne Center, the City Council imposed a condition requiring the Comprehensive Sign Program to have final approval from the City Council. On January 23, 2007, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the Comprehensive Sign Program submitted by the Applicant. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Sign Program, the Conditional Use Permit and the Variance. DISCUSSION: The proposed Country Hills Towne Center Comprehensive Sign Program establishes sign criteria for following: A. Center identification monument signs B. Tenants identification monument Signs C. Building wall signs for the market, major tenants, pad tenants and in-line shop tenants D. On-site directional monument signs The proposed sign criteria will show the number of signs allowed, the placement of the signs, and the sign area with a maximum of 25 percent for non-English language. A part of the Comprehensive Sign Program includes the renovation of the existing non -conforming pylon sign and a variance to reduce the setback for the freestanding center monument signs from ten feet to two feet for a total of six monument signs (four new and two existing signs) along Diamond Bar Blvd. The detailed summary of the Comprehensive Sign Program and the analysis of the Variance request is contained in the attached January 23, 2007, Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission discussed whether to require the applicant to install the shopping center addresses on the pylon sign. The Commission felt that including the address would help shoppers traveling on Diamond Bar Boulevard to locate businesses. The Commission determined that given the site constraint of 20 feet below street grade, a Variance is justified to reduce the setback for the monument sign. The Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval with the added condition that required the applicant to install the shopping center addresses on the pylon sign, subject to Community Development Director review and approval. Prepared by JNancy F ng, AICP Community eve Jppfnent Director Attachments: Reviewe by a Doyle Assistant City Manager 1. Draft City Council Resolution No. 2007 -XX approving Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Variance No. 2006-04 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01; 2. Planning Commission staff report dated January 23, 2007; 3. Draft Comprehensive Sign Program for the Country Hills Towne Center 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-04, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-01 AND VARIANCE NO. 2006-04 FOR THE COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER IN THE C-2 ZONE, LOCATED WEST OF DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD BETWEEN FOUNTAIN SPRINGS ROAD AND COLD SPRINGS LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA (APNS 8285-020-31 THROUGH 51). A. RECITALS. The property owner and applicant, Country Hills DB, LLC, has filed an application for Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01 and Variance No. 2006-04 for property located on Diamond Bar Boulevard between Fountain Springs Road and Cold Springs Lane, Diamond Bar, California, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Comprehensive Sign Program Conditional Use Permit, and Variance shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. Property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail and a public hearing notice for this project was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Additionally, public hearing notices were posted in three public spaces at least 10 days before the public hearing. 3. On January 23, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application and voted to recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar. 4. On February 6, 2007, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby determines that the project identified above in this resolution does not require further CEQA review. This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt in accordance to the provisions of Sections 15311 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental assessment is necessary. 3. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this City Council that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this City Council hereby finds as follows: Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) The proposed project is consistent with the required comprehensive sign program findings contained in Section 22.36.060 of the Development Code as follows: (a) The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose and the intent of Section 22.36.010 of the Development Code. (b) The signs enhance the overall development, are in harmony with, and are visually related to other signs included in the comprehensive sign program and to the structure and/or uses they identify, and to the surrounding development. The signs contain similar treatments, colors, location and size that are internally consistent and compatible with the proposed renovation of the Country Hills Towne Center fagade. (c) The comprehensive sign program accommodates future revisions that may be required due to changes in uses or tenants. The sign program contains standards and guidelines that new signs are required to meet. (d) The comprehensive sign program complies with the standards of this chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location and/or height to the extent that the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of this chapter. As conditioned and with the approval of the variance, the comprehensive sign program complies with the standards with additional signs and height that allows signs to be seen from the public right-of-way. The comprehensive sign program standards will provide an aesthetically appealing quality that will enhance the overall appearance of the Country Hills Towne Center. Variance (VAR) (d) There are special circumstances applicable to the property so that the strict application of this development code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self- created hardship or unreasonable regulation that makes it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards. The variance is required to allow the property owner to reduce the monument sign setback from Diamond Bar Boulevard. The special circumstance applicable to the property is the approximately 20 -foot grade difference between the roadway and the shopping center. The grade difference will result in poor visibility of the monument signs from the public street if the minimum 10 -foot -wide setback is enforced. The site's grade difference from the roadway places constraints on the use of the property that are not shared by other properties in the same zone. The gas station and carwash properties located on the corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Cold Springs Lane have relatively flat slopes and are at approximately the same grade as Diamond Bar Blvd. (e) Granting the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property for which the variance is sought. The strict application of the development standard would deny the property owner the right to construct monument signs with sufficient visibility from Diamond Bar Boulevard. The adjacent commercial properties are close to or at the same elevation as Diamond Bar Boulevard. (f) Granting the variance is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The variance is consistent with Objective 1.3 of the General Plan Land Use Element that states that sufficient land 3 shall be designated for retail and service commercial, professional services, and other revenue generating uses in sufficient quantity to meet the City's needs. The proposed comprehensive sign plan with the approval of the variance for setbacks and the conditional use permit forthe pylon sign will enhance the proposed renovation of an existing shopping center. The proposed renovation will assist in the revitalization of an older shopping center by enticing new customers into the center. Consequently, the project will assist in the retention of an existing retail center that provides services to nearby residents. (g) The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The project will be required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, those agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally and because of the factors discussed above in Items (a) through (c), the proposed project will not have a negative effect on property values or in the vicinity. (h) The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of CEQA and found to be categorically exempt pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15311 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental assessment is necessary. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) The proposed project is consistent with the required conditional use permit findings contained in Section 22.58.040 of the Development Code as follows: (i) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the development code and the Municipal Code. The proposed project involves modification to an existing nonconforming pylon sign. The Conditional Use Permit will allow the continued use of a nonconforming structures with improvements to the sign that will be aesthetically consistent with surrounding buildings and signs. n (j) The proposed use is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.3 that states, "Ensure that new development, and intensification of existing development, yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment, and attracts interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design." The proposed modifications to the nonconforming structure is consistent with this objective in that, as conditioned, it will provide an aesthetically appealing sign that will blend with the surrounding area and will complement the design of the Country Hills Towne Center. The proposed modification is also consistent with the Country Hills Towne Center comprehensive sign program. (k) The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with existing and future land uses in the vicinity. As conditioned, the proposed modifications to the nonconforming structure are consistent with design of the shopping center and will provide an aesthetically appealing structure that will complement and enhance the surrounding area. (1) As referenced above in Items (a) through (c), the project site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. (m) As conditioned, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project will be required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire Department requirements. (n) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with CEQA and found to be categorically exempt in accordance to the provisions of Sections 15311 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental assessment is necessary. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the City Council hereby approves Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Variance No. 2006-04 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-01, subject to the following conditions: a. General The project shall substantially conform to the Comprehensive 5 Sign Program 2006-04 labeled as Exhibit "A" dated February 6, 2007, as submitted to and approved by the City Council, and as amended herein. 2. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the conditional use permit shall be subject to periodic review. If non-compliance with the conditions of approval occurs, the City Council may review the conditional use permit. The City Council may revoke or modify the conditional use permit. 3. If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a fee for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. b. Planning Division 1. Before issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide a revised comprehensive sign program for the Planning Division's review and approval with the following changes: (a) The maximum of one primary and one secondary is allowed for major tenants B-2 and B-3. (b) Only one wall sign shall be allowed forfood court tenants. (c) One wall sign per building elevation up to a maximum of 3 per business for shops at D-2. (d) The secondary wall sign for shops at D-1 shall be reduced to a maximum of 30 square feet. (e) One wall sign per building elevation up to a maximum of 2 per business for shops at D-1. (f) The shopping center addresses provided on lower portion of the existing pylon sign directly below the shopping center identification signage. R The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; (b) Provide notice to Country Hills DB, LLC, the applicant, that the time within the judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to Applicant, Attn: Michael McCarthy, Country Hills DB, LLC, 9595 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 214, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6" DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Steve Tye, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th of February 2007, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk 7 w III DI��IOi1U B�RiI ~ W PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA . . REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.4 MEETING DATE: January 23, 2007 CASE/FILE NUMBER: CSP 2006-04 CUP 2007-01 VAR 2006-04 PROJECT LOCATION: 2825 Diamond Bar Blvd. APPLICATION REQUEST: Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program for the center, the keeping and renovation of a non- conforming pylon sign, and the reduction of setback from property line for new monument sign. PROPERTY OWNERS/: Michael McCarthy APPLICANT Country Hills DB, LLC 9595 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 214 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval to City Council BACKGROUND: Country Hills Towne Center is located at 2825 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard between Cold Springs Lane and Fountain Springs Road. On December 6, 2005, the City Council approved the entitlements for a facade renovation for the existing shopping center and the construction of two new buildings on the site. The new building for H -Mart and the fagade renovation is presently in progress. A condition of approval for the entitlements requires that the applicant prepare a Comprehensive Sign Program for Planning Commission review and a recommendation be forwarded to City Council for final review and approval. Another condition of approval requires that the keeping of the existing non -conforming pylon sign and the renovation of the sign be subject to a separate Conditional Use Permit. ANALYSIS: A. Review Authority (Sections 22.58,22.36.060, and 22.48) The proposed project requires the following applications: Comprehensive Sign Program for multi -tenant shopping center and allowing more than five signs. 2. Conditional Use Permit for the keeping and the renovation of the existing nonconforming pylon sign. 3. Variance for the reduction of the monument sign setback from 10 feet to two feet from the property line. The above applications typically are reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Due to the specific condition of approval from City Council, the Planning Commission in this case is a recommending body. B. Comprehensive Sign Plan (Section 22.36.060): The purpose of a comprehensive sign program is to integrate signs with the design of the buildings and achieve a unified architectural statement. A comprehensive sign program is required for all projects proposing five or more signs. Through the comprehensive sign program, flexibility in the application of the sign standards is allowed if they meet the intent of the code. The proposed comprehensive sign program for the Country Hills Towne Center establishes standards and design guidelines for new wall signs for both existing buildings and new buildings. Additionally, it includes standards and design guidelines for renovation of the existing pylon sign, directional signs, project identification monument signs, and tenant identification monument signs. The following table provides a summary and recommendations of the proposed Page 2 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) various types of signs and their consistency with the sign standards contained in Section 22.36 of the Development Code. 1. Wall Signs: Sign Buildings Quantity Sign Area Max. Recommendations Type (sq. ft.) Height Market 5 125 sf 5 ft The number of signs will not create clutter A due to the large amount of building frontage. Major tenant wall signs 1 primary 125 sf 5 ft Meets intent of code (B-1, Rite Aid) B Major tenant wall signs 1 primary 71.75 sf 3 ft Meets intent of code. (B-2) Major tenant wall signs 1 primary 125 sf 4 ft Staff recommends that the signs be limited (B-3) to one primary and one secondary wall sign 2 secondary 93 sf 4 ft for major tenants B-2 and B-3. Pad tenant 2 32 sf 2 ft; or Existing KFC and Burger King C 3 ft logo Multi -tenant for shops at 50 sf 2 ft; or Staff recommends 1 wall sign per building D D-2 30 inches elevation up to a maximum of 3 per letter/logo; business or 5 ft logo Multi -tenant for new two- primary 50 sf 3 ft Staff recommends that the secondary wall D story shop building (D-1) sign be reduced to 30 square feet; and allow secondary 50 sf 18 inches 1 sign per building elevation up to a maximum of 2 per business Multi -tenant for inline 1 primary 35 sf 2 ft Meets intent of code. A secondary sign is E shops allowed only if the tenant has a 50 feet plus 1 secondary 14 inches leased frontage. Multi -tenant for food 1 per tenant 22 sf 18 inches Sign criteria should clearly state that only F court one per tenant is permitted. Four-story medical office 2 primary 125 sf 2 ft Meets intent of code. G building 2 secondary 30 sf 16 inches Page 3 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) 2. Monument Signs: Type Quantity Sign Area Height Setback Location Analysis (sq. ft.) Project 2 32 sf 6 ft 2 ft Diamond Bar Blvd. Recommend approval of setback identification frontage Variance request (CH) Market (M) 2 32 sf 6 ft 2 ft Cold Springs Ln. Variance requested for setback. Staff entrance & Fountain does not recommends approval of Springs Rd. entrance the variance setback Pad tenant 2 24 sf 7.5 ft 2 ft Diamond Bar Blvd. Recommend approval of setback (PT) frontage Variance request Multi -tenant 2 24 sf 4.75 ft 2 ft Diamond Bar Blvd. Meets intent of code because of size (ME) (4 tenants entrance of center. on each side) Multi -tenant 2 24 sf with 7.5 ft 2 ft Diamond Bar Blvd. 10 monument signs along Diamond (MF) 4 tenants frontage Bar frontage. Staff is of the opinion on each that it is overcrowding the side streetscape and recommends the multi -tenant sign close to Burger King be eliminated. With a comprehensive sign program, the sign codes allow the flexibility for increasing the number of monument signs. The center is about 20 feet below street grade, which results in poor visibility from Diamond Bar Boulevard. Therefore, the additional number of wall signs over that allowed by the development code will improve the visibility and the name recognition of types of shops within the center. However, increasing the number of monument signs should not result in overcrowding the street frontage. Staff recommends that the one multi -tenant monument sign closest to Burger King be eliminated. With respect to design of the proposed monument signs, they are aesthetically appealing and complement each other with the use of stacked stones and cornice treatments as common features. C. Conditional Use Permit (Sec. 22.58): The applicant is proposing to renovate the existing double -sided pylon sign located in the median of the main entrance driveway off Diamond Bar Boulevard. The pylon sign was constructed in 1961, which predate City incorporation. It is considered nonconforming because the City's Development Code prohibits pole signs. However, Section 22.68.030 of the Development Code allows modifications to nonconforming structures with Page 4 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) approval of a conditional use permit. The modifications must be necessary for safety reasons, to reduce fire hazards or to improve the aesthetics of the structure and that the Conditional Use Permit findings can be met. The applicant proposes to remove the existing sign cabinets and install two new cabinet signs at the top for major tenants and spaces for seven tenants in the middle portion. A Country Hills Towne Center identification logo sign is proposed for the lower portion of the sign. The sign posts are proposed to be clad in stacked stone and the sign will have a cap with a cornice type treatment. The proposed modifications will enhance the aesthetics of the structure, complement the proposed improvements to the shopping center buildings, and provide further visibility to the center. D. Variance (Section 22.54): The required setback for monument signs is 10 feet from the property line. The applicant proposes a setback of two feet. As mentioned in the above section, the site is approximately 20 feet below the street grade with a 2 to 1 slope that exists behind the sidewalk and property line. Placing a monument 10 feet from the property line within a 2 to 1 slope will require a support wall of more than 10 feet, which increases the total height of the monument sign to 16 feet to be seen from Diamond Bar Boulevard. By reducing the setback to two feet from the property line, it will allow the monument signs to be approximately 6-7'/2 feet in height and be visible from the street. Therefore, a variance is necessary and staff can make the findings to support the approval of the variance. No other commercial center has the same condition as Country Hills Towne Center. It is a unique site and has unusual circumstances where the approval of the variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights as other commercial center property owners in the same zone. Staff recommends that the variance request for the monument signs proposed along Diamond Bar Boulevard be approved. However, the variance request to reduce the monument sign setbacks for both Cold Springs Lane and Fountain Springs Road is not supported by the site constraints. Therefore, staff does not recommend approval of the monument signs at Cold Spring Lane and Fountain Springs Road. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the legal notice was posted at the City's designated community posting sites. Page 5 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15311 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental assessment is necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project with conditions. Prepared by: Sandra Campbell Contract Senior Planner Reviewed by: Nancy Fong, AICP Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Draft resolution recommending approval of Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01 and Variance No. 2006-04; 2. Exhibit "A" — Country Hills Towne Center Master Sign Plan Page 6 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) ATTACHMENT 3 COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM City Council Hearing February 6, 2007 ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/l�/007 ■ ■ ■ ■ MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR ■ ■ ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 2825 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD L ■ DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA ■ January, 2007 CI Prepared for CID MCC REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC. ■ 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 214 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ■ ■ Prepared by ■ Michael J. McLaughlin & Associates DESIGN STUDIO 2047 Janet Circle, Oceanside, CA 92054 760.722.8020 v 760.722.7019 fx ■ mjmrender Lftmac.com ■ Poge 1 ■ IIC COUNTRY HILLS TO'vVN CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS MASTER SIGN FLAB 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 1. 1. Location 1.2. Planning & Zoning 1.3. Terms & Conditions 2.0 SUBMITTALS AND APPROVALS 2.1 Submittal to MCC Realty Management, Inc. 2.2 Shop Drawings 2.3 City Submittal 2.4 Tenant Responsibilities 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1. General Requirements 3.2. Color 3.3. Sign Area 3.4. Graphic Design 3.5. Illumination 3.6. Fabrication and installation 4.0 PERMITTED SIGNS / SPECIFICAIONS 4.1. Country Hills Town Center Identification 4.2. Market Identification 4.3. Major Tenant Identification 4.4. Pad Business Identification 4.5. In-line Shop Identification 4.6. In-line Shops Window Signs 4.7. Operational Signs 5.0 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 6.0 TEMPORARY SIGNS 7.0 SEASONAL AND EVENT SIGNS 8.0 PROHIBITED SIGNS 9.0 GENERAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 1/10/2007 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15311 and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental assessment is necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project with conditions. Prepared by: Sandra Campbell Contract Senior Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: Nancy Fong, AICP Community Development Director 1. Draft resolution recommending approval of Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01 and Variance No. 2006-04; 2. Exhibit "A" — Country Hills Towne Center Master Sign Plan Page 6 (CSP No. 2006-04, VAR No. 2006-04 & CUP No. 2007-02) ATTACHMENT 3 COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM City Council Hearing February 6, 2007 ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1110/2007 ■ ■ ■ ■ MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR ■ ■ ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER ■ 2825 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD ■ DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA _ ■ P^rye ■ January, 2007 ■ Prepared for co MCC REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC. ■ 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 214 ■ BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ■ ■ Prepared by ■ Michael J. McLaughlin & Associates DESIGN STUDIO 2047 Janet Circle, Oceanside, CA 92054 . 760.722.8020 v 760.722.7019 fx mjmr gn d e r lj@ ma -cc om Page 1 t- COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 t_, Page 2 Page 3 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/1012007 ■ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 5.0 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 1. 1. Location 6.0 TEMPORARY SIGNS 1.2. Planning & Zoning 7.0 SEASONAL AND EVENT SIGNS 1.3. Terms & Conditions 8.0 PROHIBITED SIGNS r 2.0 SUBMITTALS AND APPROVALS 9.0 GENERAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Submittal to MCC Realty Management, Inc. 2.2 Shop Drawings 2.3 City Submittal ■ 2.4 Tenant Responsibilities 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA ■ 3.1. General Requirements 3.2. Color 3.3. Sign Area 3.4. Graphic Design 3.5. Illumination 3.6. Fabrication and installation r 4.0 PERMITTED SIGNS / SPECIFICAIONS 4.1. Country Hills Town Center Identification 4.2. Market Identification 4.3. Major Tenant Identification 4.4. Pad Business Identification r 4.5. In-line Shop Identification 4.6. In-line Shops Window Signs 4.7. Operational Signs Page 3 UOUNTRv HILLS TOWN :ENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 Page 4 N ■ ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 ■ EXHIBITS E. I Site Map Monument Sign Locations E.12 Multi-Tenant Wall Signs (Shops D-1) E.2 Typical Wall Sign Specifications and Exceptions E.13 Multi-Tenant Wall Signs (Shops D-2) ■ E.3 Country Hills Town Center Freestanding Sign E.14 Multi-Tenant Wall Signs (Shops E) EA Country Hills Town Center Identification Sign E.15 Multi-Tenant Wall Signs (Shops F) E.5 Market Identification Monument Sign E.16 COURTYARD Identification Sign (Shops F) E.6 Market Wall Signs E.17 Multi-Tenant Under Canopy Sign E.7 Major Tenant Wall Sign Elevations E.18 Window Signs E.8 Pad Tenant Monument Sign E.19 Operational Signs E.9 Pad Tenant Monument Wall Signs E.20 Professional Office Signs S E.10 Multi-Tenant Monument at Primary Entry E.21 Temporary Marketing Sign E.1 I Multi-Tenant Monument at Diamond Bar Blvd. E.22 Seasonal Event Banners ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ png S COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1.0 Introduction to Country Hills Town Center Country Hills Town Center is an exciting remodeled community shopping center in the City of Diamond Bar. Country Hills Town Center provides a community market place for a diverse array of retail enterprises and includes a supermarket, pharmacy, restaurants, shops and medical/professional office. The business identification and way -finding signs shall compliment the community shopping center architecture with a high level of quality and creativity. All monument and wall signs within Country Hills Town Center shall maintain a consistent theme and provide adequate identification and direction. 1.1 Location Country Hills Town Center is located at 2825 Diamond Bar Blvd. The 18.36 -acre site provides for a community shopping center. (Refer to Exhibit I) 1.2 Planning and Zoning The sign information presented in this document should be used in conjunction with the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Business identification signs require that Country Hills Town Center Tenant's become familiar with the requirements set forth by the City of Diamond Bar. 1.3 Terms and Conditions 1.3.1 Each tenant within Country Hills Town Center acknowledges receipt of the Country Hills Town Center Master Sign Plan and agrees to the requirements contained therein and specifically the following signage requirements. 1.3.2 Tenant shall be responsible for all plan preparations, permit processing costs and application fees. 1.3.3 Tenant shall be responsible for all costs of sign fabrication and installation, including review of Shop Drawings and patterns. 1.3.4 Tenant shall be responsible for all costs related to signage removal, including repair of any damage to the building. t j Page 6 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELS 2 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP 18722 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 247 PAGES 28 TO 31 INCLUDIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY MASTER SIGN PIAN 1/10/2007 rurinl r' I SCALE: 1- 57 0 2s 60 iov �j L_� 1� ---Z za m - AUTOMOBILE(LUB -- ;� _ NDfAPARf -`c---•—v"- �'i - KF � -�- - --a- -- - - --- _ AAA --- MULTI. TENANT COUNTRY HILLS DIAMOND BAR BLVD- ®�,— �� TOWN CENTER MULTI -TENANT a TO GROUND SIGNS 80' 80— FREESTANDING SIGN TRAFFIC DIRECTION PROJECT IDENTIFICATION TU T 2 COUNTRY HILLS TENANTS MARKET T 3 C-1 DRIVE-THRU T 4 C-2 DRIVE-THRU PAD TENANT MULTI -TENANT (ENTRY) MULTI -TENANT (DIAMOND BAR BLVD FRONTAGE) MICHAEL J. McL.AUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES SITE MAP GROUND SIGN LOCATIONS I PROJECT COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER DATE 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 310 247 2730 ADDRESS 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 EXHIBIT E S 1 G N 8 TU D 1 Q FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAV -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.701199 E mjmrenderl@mac.com Page 7 i COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 f1 1 1.3.5 Tenant shall also be responsible for maintaining the condition, appearance and operation of its signs. 1.3.6 Only those sign types provided for and specifically approved in writing by t ` Landlord shall be allowed. j 1.3.7 At Tenant's expense, Landlord may correct, replace or remove any sign that is installed without written approval of plans as submitted by Tenant. t 2.0 Submittals and Approvals r- Graphic design, materials, construction and installation of all tenant signs will be subject to MCC Realty Management, Inc. review and approval. Changed or revised plans and will be done solely at tenant's [ ' expense. MCC Realty Management, Inc., (Landlord), may designate a representative for review and approval of sign submittals. 2.1 Submittal to MCC Realty Management, Inc. 4" Tenant shall submit for review and written approval a complete set of Shop Drawings prior to T sign fabrication. Landlord shall provide written approval of drawings prior to any submission to the City of Diamond Bar. Approvals provided by Landlord should not constitute City of Diamond Bar approval or guarantee jurisdictional approval. . 2.2 Shop Drawings — Each Tenant shall prepare Shop Drawings including: 2.2.1 Proposed storefront elevation(s) illustrating sign location drawn to scale, j 2.2.2 Samples of color & materials 2.2.3 Specifications for fabrication including, but not limited to, gauge of material, paint t manufacturer and method of attachment 2.2A Section through letter and/or sign panel showing the dimensional projection of the face of the letter and the method of illumination. 1 Page 8 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PIAN 2.3 City Submittal Upon receipt of written approval of Shop Drawings from Landlord, Tenant shall submit an application for Sign Permit for all permanent and temporary signs to the Planning Division at the City of Diamond Bar. City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Phone (909) 837-7000 2.4 Tenant Responsibilities Scheduling of sign installation shall be coordinated with Landlord No signs shall be installed prior to approval by Landlord and the City of Diamond Bar. The Tenant is responsible for providing copies of the sign/building permit from the City of Diamond Bar. Prior to scheduling any sign installation and a certificate of liability insurance naming the following: Country Hills DB, LLC MCC Realty Management, Inc. MCC/A Realty Partners I, LLC The above additional insured are located at 9595 Wilshire Blvd. #214 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 1/10{2007 Page 9 0 a6oa LOOVOIi I NVId NOIS d31SVW NAIN3- NMOL SIIIH AKN0OD COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA Tenant signs at Country Hills Town Center establish the identities of each occupant. The design of the Tenant signs shall be integrated into the architecture of the storefront. General provisions and design specifications for Country Hills Town Center signs are set forth in this Sign Plan. S 3.1 General Requirements All signs shall provide business identification by use of the name and/or nature of the business as sign copy (text). Phone numbers, hours of operation, price or sale advertising shall not be allowed. The use of English—type lettering (Indo-European linguistic symbols: a -z) shall be provided on all signs. Non-English—type symbols are permitted provided said symbols are accompanied by English type lettering translating the meaning of the symbols. Tenant signs are expected to enhance and extend the spirit of the architecture for the retail shops, clearly expressing the tenant name and function while also serving as an expression of the high quality of merchandise and services to be found within. ■ 3.2 Color Corporate colors are encouraged. Contrasting primary or exaggerated color combinations are discouraged. Sign colors and illumination should be harmonious with the color palette of the storefront architecture. 3.3 Sign Area Sign area shall be calculated based on I square foot of sign area per lineal building frontage. Maximum sign area for freestanding and monuments signs may be limited by design specifications outlined in this sign plan. Wall signs shall be no closer to an architectural feature than 1/2 the letter height. This may result in signs that will be less than the maximum graphic height permitted. 'nge 1 1 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CEN I ER MASTER SION PLAN 3.4 Graphic Design The use of English—type lettering (Indo-European linguistic symbols: a -z) shall be provided on all signs. Non-English—type symbols are permitted provided said symbols are accompanied by English type lettering translating the meaning of the symbols. Signs comprised of non-English—type cultural typefaces, characters, annotated forms, directional glyphs for vertical writing and glyphs used for emphasis, punctuation or as abbreviations shall not exceed 25% of the sign area. Geometric shaped logos comprised of illustrations, symbols or cultural characters may be permitted. The geometric shapes shall be square or contoured to conform to the graphics. Creative sign design for tenants will be considered provided it contributes to the overall identity of the store. Consideration shall be provided for designs that incorporate typographic swashes, ascender and descended letters. R4 r xhil}i, 2. Tenants may use established type styles, logos and/or images that are registered trademarks. Tag lines or descriptive phrases identifying the nature of the business may be permitted on wall signs only. A portion of the in-line shop lease space shall be required to incorporate a "Sign Shelf' and include fixed specifications for sign design. Paye 12 1 IN COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS FOR CALCULATING WALL SIGN AREA ASCENDER & DESCENDER LETTERS 0 EXCEPTIONS TO CALCULATING THE MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT SHALL BE LIMITED TO 25% OF THE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT LETTER/LOGO �estaurant SIGN AREA IS CALCULATED BASED ON 1 SQUARE FOOT OF +25°i HEIGHT SIGN AREA PER LINEAL BUILDING FRONTAGE jj 1 SIGN WIDTH ■ LTTERS/LOGO SHALL BE NO CLOSER TO ARCHITECTURAL SIGNS WITH INITIAL CAPITAL LETTERS, LOWERCASE ASCENDERS, DESCENDERS OR FEATURE THAN 1/2 THE SIGN HEIGHT. SWASHES MAY EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT BY 25% � MAXIMUM SIGN AREA MAY BE RESTRICTED OR LIMITED BY (EXAMPLE 30" LETTER 37 1/2" WITH SWASH) SPECIFIC DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THE SIGN PLAN. ALL CAPITAL LETTERS GEOMETRIC LOGO OR SYMBOL LETTER/LOGO LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT ESTAUMNT HEIGHTn I z%ESTAURANT ■ +25 ■ ` SIGN WIDTH 'h-- 25%1 75 TYPICAL CHANNEL LETTER SIGN LAYOUT WITH CAPITAL LETTERS LOGOS, SYMBOLS OR DESCRIPTIVE PHRASES SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% . SHALL NOT EXCEED A MAXIMUM LETTER/LOG HEIGHT. OF THE SIGN AREA WIDTH. ONLY SYMBOLS, LETTERS, LOGOS AND GRAPHICS MAY BE ILLUMINATED. ■ SIGN BACKGROUND SHALL NON BE ILLUMINATED. TWO LINES OF TEXT LETTERS & SIGN CABINET ■ MAXIMUM MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO LETTER/LOGO RESTAURANT HEIGHT RESTAURANT HEIGHT +25 SEAFOOD & STEAK +20% 1 SIGN WIDTH SIGN WIDTH —� ■ SIGNS WITH TWO LINES OF TEXT TYPICAL TWO LINES OF TEXT, LAYOUT WITHIN SIGN AREA MAY EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT BY 20% ON BUILDING WALL AT LEASE HOLD WIDTH. . (EXAMPLE 24 -MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT TO 36" WITH TWO LINES OF TEXT.) SIGN LETTERS SHALL BE GENERALLY CENTERED VERTICALLY. TYPICAL WALL SIGN PROJECT DATE MICHAEL J. MttAUGHLIN &ASSOCIATES SPECIFICATIONS & EXCEPTIONS COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 �� C ! Ai (T 1 V1 U' O MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 2 ■ FOR IMAGE, INTIK•VJREIT,ITIVE.A)NDIWAVFINGING SIGNS 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, 19 91054 310 247 2730 ■ 760. mjmr 20Pnde 760.711.7019E mjmrenderl0mac.com Page 13 r COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PIAN 111012007 i i t r 3.S Illumination t Monument signs shall be internally illuminated, incorporating any of the following methods: r. Push-thru acrylic letters that emit light through the letter face Channel letters and logos that emit light through the letter face i' Reverse channel letters that illuminate the wall surface from behind the letter The background area of all monument signs shall be non -illuminated. Wall signs may incorporate any of the following methods: r' Reverse channel letters with silhouetted illumination that up -lights the building surface behind the sign letters. Channel letters, which project light through clear or translucent acrylic letter faces. Exposed single stroke neon, colored or fabricated is a manner that provides for the sign i to be readable during the day as well as at night. All illuminated signs must be fabricated and installed in compliance with all applicable legal i requirements and must bear the UL labels. Labels to be located generally out of the pedestrian view. 3.6 Fabrication and Installation All signs and installation of the signs will conform to the City of Diamond Bar building and electrical codes as well as sign permit requirements. Any illuminated sign or lighting device shall employ only lamps emitting a light of constant intensity. j j 1 Page 14 s COUNTRY HIL[S TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 Paye 15 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 4.0 Permitted signs / Specifications The permitted signs, size and location shall vary depending on the size of tenant occupancy and location. Design specifications for wall signs are unique to the location of the In -Line Shop storefront within Country Hills Town Center. Located in a picturesque hillside community of Diamond Bar, Country Hills Town Center businesses do not have the benefit of at -grade street exposure. Located generally ±20 feet below Diamond Bar Blvd. building wall sign exposure is severely limited. Business identification for the Market, Major Tenants, and Pad Tenants shall be accomplished with the combination of monument and building wall signs. In -Line Shop businesses may also be identified with monument signs. 4.1 Country Hills Town Center Identification 4. 1.1 Location FREESTANDING SIGN (P) Maximum Height of 30'-4" Sign Area Varies per Tenant (Market, Major Tenants and Shop Tenants) An existing double -sided freestanding sign within the median of the primary driveway at Diamond Barr Blvd. shall be modified to incorporate a Country Hills Town Center Identification logo/type. The freestanding sign may identify up to eight (8) tenants. R'011' to i hil3t; :3 j f j Page 16 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER QUANTITY 1 SIGN COLORS MATCH BUILDINGS SIGN STURCTURE - STUCCO FINISH SIGN CABINETS - PAINT FINISH ICI 673 BARRISTER WHITE ® ICI 548 BEACHCOMBER © ICI 422 SAND MOTIF ® BENIAMINE MOORE BM -(65 DEEP BRONZE NON ILLUMINATED BACKGROUNDS EXISTING SIGN MICHAEL J. McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac com 30'-4" TOP OF SIGN CHANNEL LETTERS OR 5" DEEP LOGO CABINET 3'-4" 24 PUSH THRU GRAPHICS + BLACK/1WHITE, AND RED VINYL LETTER FACE LETTERS OR LOGO fi -r Y CABINET WITH 2'-8" 20" ILLUMINATED GRAPHICS _L_j- Y' DEEP CABINET PUSH THRU GRAPHICS BLACKOHITE, AND RED VINYL LETTER FACE ELDORADOSTONE SMOKEY MOUNTAIN LEDGESTONE DRYSTACK PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ALUMINUM CABINET W/PUSH -THRU GRAPHICS 4'-6" NON -ILLUMINATED BACKGROUND MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 FREESTANDING SIGN fi 4"� &MAJOR 14'-4" -� �— 5'-4"� TENANT SIGN PANEL il' 8' TYPICAL 3'-6"- 7"y OLOR ro0E TYPICAL ® SIGN AREA 28.5 SOFT L I 5" DEEP CHANNEL LETTER O 28.5 SOFT 5 SOFT EACH 17.5 SOFT 4"T 17.5 SOFT 17.5 SOFT 4"f CAST STONE LION HEAD 4'-6" 2'X Y-3" 5" DEEP CHANNEL LETTER Y' DEEP SIGN CABINET KITH PUSH-THRU GRAPHICS F--TRn-ST-ANDING,SIGN PROJECT DATE DOUBLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 3 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 17 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION MONUMENT (C) Maximum Height of 6'-0" above sidewalk grade Sign Area Maximum 32 Sq. Ft. Setback minimum 2' from Property line Monument signs identifying Country Hills Town Center shall be located in a landscape planter area at the southeasterly corner of Country Hills Town Center. t> The sign shall be setback ten (10) feet from the property line to provide for clear vehicle line of sight. Refer to Exhibit 4. 4.1.2 Objective The objective of the sign design is to identify the Country Hills Town Center, its businesses and create way -finding for the shopping center. C 4.1.3 Design The design of the sign provides for identification of Country Hills Town Center and j introduces the architectural colors and materials of the center. The street address is conspicuously located on the sign to meet the legitimate j requirements for fire and safety. [ j j j Page 18 E COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 30" PILASTER 36" MASONRY CAP I fi �- 10' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE AT DIAMOND BAR BLVD, QUANTITY 2 SINGLE SIDED SIGN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN COLORS MATCH BUILDINGS SIGN CABINET- BM -DEEP BRONZE DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WHITE ACRYLIC GRAPHICS NON ILLUMINATED BACKGROUNDS 4'-6" 1'-6" MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl®m—com SIGN CABINET SET INTO STONE VENEER 13-8" MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGN 2' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE AT DIAMOND BAR BLVD EWALK 8'-0" R.O.W. T-6" X T-6" 5" DEEP PAINTED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET 1/2" PUSH-THRU GRAPHICS STONE VENEER APPLIED SIGN BASE. PRECAST CAP/TRIM 5'-6" ABOVE — SIDEWALK GRADE 5,-6„ FM PR JE IDE TIFI TIO SIGN PROJECT DATE DOUBLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 4 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 19 f COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 f f f 4.2 Market Identification 4.2.1 Location The two (2) double -sided monuments signs located on (1) Fountain Springs Rd. and (2) f Cold Springs Rd. will provide adequate notice for patrons to access the shopping center safely. f Refer to Exhibit I for location and Exhibit 5 for specifications. f ' f' MARKET MONUMENT (M) Maximum Height of 6'-0" above sidewalk grade f' Sign Area Maximum 32 Sq. Ft. Setback minimum 2' from Property line f l I I Page 20 g i a COUNTRY HILLS -OWN CENTER COLD SPRINGS RD. ■ COLLECTOR STREET FRONTAGE SIGN CABINET SET ON TO WALL CAP 2'-0" Y-6" 30" PILASTER L 36"MASONRY CAP I IN 9'-6"X4'-6" 8'-0" X 2'-4" 12" DEEP SIGN CABINET SIGN GRAPHIC AREA 112" PUSH-THRU GRAPHICS 18.66 SOFT SIGN AREA STONE VENEER A A PORTION OF EX SIGN BASE, PREC ELDORADO STONI SMOKEY MOUND LEDGESTONE DRY MASTER SIGN PLAN QUANTITY 2 SINGLE SIDED SIGN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN COLORS MATCH BUILDINGS SIGN CABINET - BM -DEEP BRONZE WHITE ACRYLIC GRAPHICS INON ILLUMINATED BACKGROUNDS 4'-6" 9'-6"X4'-6" 12' DEEP PAINTED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET 112" PUSH-THRU GRAPHICS 1/10/2007 MARKET MONUMENT SIGN is �� 4k,' A I FOUNTAIN SPRINGS RD. COLLECTOR STREET FRONTAGE 10'-0" MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderlQmac.com R TSI PROJECT DATE DOUBLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 5 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 21 GS COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 MARKET WALL SIGNS Multiple wall signs are permitted. A Primary business name sign shall identify the business, per frontage. Secondary signs may be permitted to also identify the nature of the business. Wall signs of various sizes are anticipated. Refer to Exhibit 6 Maximum Letter Height of 60" Secondary Sign Letter Height Sign Area Maximum 125 Sq. Ft. 4.2.2 Objective The design specifications of the monument and wall signs meet the minimum requirements for safe readability. 4.2.3 Design Monument signs shall incorporate internally illuminated dimensional graphics, and non - illuminated background. All business identification wall signs shall be fabricated as channel letters. Page 22 COUNTRY HILLS T OWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN EAST ELEVATION SIGN AREA, 125 SQ.FT. 5'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION. 5'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 1/10/2007 MARKET WALL SIGNS O M-1 1 SQ. FT. OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAL FOOT OF LEASEHOLD WIDTH/FRONTAGE SECONDARY SIGN LOCATION 5'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT SOUTH ELEVATION SIGN AREA 48 SQ. FT. PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 4'-0"MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT MICHAEL J. MCL.AUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES «Esi�N sTu�io FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com I YFICAL LOCATION FOR SINGLE SECONDARY SIGN FOR IN-STORE SERVICE BUSINESS NORTH ELEVATION SIGN AREA 60 SQ. FT. PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 5'-0"MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT --7 PROJECT FD -AT -E MARKET SIGN BUILDING ELEVATIONS S COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 2/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 6 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 23 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1 /1C/2007 ILL t 4.3 Major Tenant Identification t 4.3.1 Location [ Identification on Freestanding Sign (M) . MAJOR TENANT WALL SIGNS t :- Multiple wall signs are permitted. A Primary business name sign shall identify the t "> business. Secondary signs may be permitted to also identify the nature of the business. Wall signs of various sizes are anticipated. t Refer to Exhibit 7 [ I MAJOR A & B Maximum Letter/Logo Height of 36" Single line of text MAJOR C Maximum Letter/Logo Height of 48" Single line of text MAJOR C Secondary Sign Letter Height 14" [ Sign Area Maximum 125 Sq. Ft. 4.3.2 Objective t The design specifications of the monument and wall signs meet the minimum requirements for safe readability. [ 4.3.3 Design [ Wall signs shall be no closer to an architectural feature than 1/2 the letter height. This [ may result in signs that will be less that the maximum graphic height permitted. All business identification wall signs shall be fabricated as channel letters. j i 1 j Page 24 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER PAASTER SIGN PLAN PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION. 4'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 125 SQ. FT. SHOWN FOR PRIMARY ENTRY 1/10/2007 MAJOR TENANT WALL SIGNS B-1, B-2 AND B-3 MAJOR B-1 1 SQ. FT. OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAL FOOT OF LEASEHOLD WIDTH/FRONTAGE PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 3'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 71.75 SQ. FT. SHOWN FOR PRIMARY ENTRY u MAJOR B-2 0 SCALE 10' MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 4'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 125 SQ. FT. SHOWN FOR PRIMARY ENTRY a �1 ►,1 a MAJOR B-3 SECONDARY SIGN LOCATIONS 4'-0" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 93 SQ. FT. SHOWN FOR TOWER SIGN LOCATIONS 2 NORTH F— O I ELEVATION. MAJOR B-3 TOWER FEATURE BUILDING ELEVATION COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 2/20/06 MAJOR TENNT SIGN MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 1 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 310 247 2730 Page 25 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 4.4 Pad Business Identification (Single Tenant Occupancy) 4.4.1 Location PAD TENANT MONUMENT (PT) Maximum Height of 6'-0" above sidewalk grade Sign Area Maximum 24 Sq. Ft. Setback minimum 2' from Property line Drive-thru tenants shall submit a revised sign plan in conjunction with any architectural improvements. The sign plan shall incorporate all planned and existing signs and shall be submitted to Landlord and City of Diamond Bar for review. Monument signs on the adjacent arterial frontage provide business identification at Diamond Bar Blvd. frontage for the Pad Businesses. Refer to Exhibit 8 j i Page 26 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER QUANTITY 1 DOUBLE SIDED SIGN SIGN COLORS MATCH BUILDINGS SIGN STURCTURE - STUCCO FINISH SIGN CABINETS - PAINT FINISH ® ICI 673 BARRISTER WHITE ® ICI 548 BEACHCOMBER © ICI 422 SAND MOTIF V BENIAMINE MOORE BM -C65 DEEP BRONZE NON ILLUMINATED BACKGROUNDS EXAMPLE OF EXISTING SIGN 8" HIGH ADDRESS NUMERALS I-- 2'-0" —� 6' XT OVERALL SIGN 18" SETBACK / SIDEWALK 24 sgft 46 KFC LOGO 6'X8' OVERALL SIGN 18" SETBACK/ SIDEWALK 20 sgft 5X5' BK 6'X8' OVERALL SIGN 18" SETBACK/ SIDEWALK 24 sgft 3'X8' A(LB MICHAEL J. McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com T-6" BOVE SIDEWALK GRADE 1'-0" BELOW SIDEWALK GRADE MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 PAD TENANT MONUMENT SIGN ELDORADO STONE SMOKEY MOUNTAIN LEDGESTONEDRYSTACK 1 PAD TENANT PROJECT DATE MONUMENT SIGN DOUBLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 8 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 27 SIGN PANEL pw% I� 5'-0" X C 2" DEEP - NON -ILLUMINATED BACKGROUND EXAMPLES SHOWN ILLUSTRATE HOW FUTURE TENANTS MAY BE REFURBISHED CONFORM WITH CRITERIA SETT FORTH BY THE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN R.O.W. �— 2'-0" ELDORADO STONE SMOKEY MOUNTAIN LEDGESTONEDRYSTACK 1 PAD TENANT PROJECT DATE MONUMENT SIGN DOUBLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 8 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 27 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 PAD TENANT WALL SIGNS [ Maximum Letter Height of 24" - Logo Graphic 36" Sign Area Maximum 32 Sq. Ft. per sign (1 sq. ft. per lineal foot of building frontage) [ Setback minimum 2' from Property line [ , Multiple wall signs are permitted for Pad Businesses. [ Wall signs are permitted on a maximum of two (2) Pad Building elevations. [ 4.4.2 Objective All Pad Businesses with a drive-thru incorporated into the business operation shall be [ permitted a double sided monument sign. Adequate wall and monument signs provide safe way finding, i.e. "DRIVE THRU", within the parking areas no greater than 30 from drive thru access. i 4.4.3 Design j Monument signs shall be internally illuminated and incorporate dimensional graphics. A [ . maximum of two (2) tenants may be identified on a monument sign. All business identification wall signs shall be fabricated as channel letters or industry standard logos/symbols. [ { j 1 Page 28 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CEN IER PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 2'-6" MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT PAD TENANT SCHEMATIC EXAMPLE 0 SCALE 10' MICHAEL J. McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019E mjmrenderlQmac.com MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 TYPICAL PAD TENANT WALL SIGNS C-1 & C-2 10 PRIMARY SIGN LOCATION 5'-0" MAXIMUM GRAPHIC LOGO HEIGHT PAD TENANT SCHEMATIC EXAMPLE DRIVE-THRU PAD TENANTS SHALL SUBMIT A REVISED SIGN PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY ARCHITECTURAL OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THE SIGN PLAN SHALL INCORPORATE ALL PLANNED AND EXISTING SIGNS AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDLORD AND CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. TYPICAL PAD TENANT SIGN BUILDING ELEVATION MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 310 247 2730 PROJECT DATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 ADDRESS EXHIBIT 9 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ Page 29 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 4.5 Multi -tenant Shops 4.5.1 Location In-line shop tenants may be identified on Multi -tenant monument signs at Landlord's discretion. Refer to Exhibit 10 MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT Primary Entry (ME) Maximum Height of 4'-9" Sign Area Maximum 5.5 Sq. Ft. (Two monuments, total of 8 tenants) Setback utilize existing sign wall, minimum 2' from Property line i 1/10/2007 s I 1 Page 30 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER SIGN PANEL: BM -DEEP BRONZE FLAT PAINT FINISH 72' X 14" X Y' DEEP ROUTED .090" SIGN FACE ACRYLIC PANEL WITH PRINTED OR PUSH-THRU SIGN GRAPHICS. SIGN STRUCTURE: REFURBISH EXISTING LANDSCAPE WALL INSTALL ALUMINUM CABINETS WITH STONE VENEER FLUORESCENT LAMPS 1 4'-9' 12" LETTERS/LO OR SYMBOL 8" MAXIMUN LETTER HEIGH MASTER SIGN PLAN LETTERSAOGOS 2' CABINET WITH III IIMINATFD UAPHIN 1/10/2007 MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT SIGN is PRIMARY ENTRY (ASTSTONE LION HEAD 2' X 2'-3" ELDORADO STONE SMOKEY MOUNTAIN LEDGESTONE DRMACK IENEER APPLIED 6E. PRECAST (ANTRIM DIAMOND BAR BLVD. ADD COLOR AND STONE SPECIFICATIONS DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PRIMARY ENTRY DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 0 - NORTH MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DE816N STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760,722,7020 , 760.722.7019F mjmrender 2�mac.com F_ MULTI TENANT MONUMENT PROJECT DATE SINGLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 10 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 31 Z Lu REFRFURBISH THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE WALLS FOR Z 1 SIGN PANELS , SETBACK 10' FROM I ---------- - ----- ----- PROPERTY LINE DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 0 - NORTH MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DE816N STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760,722,7020 , 760.722.7019F mjmrender 2�mac.com F_ MULTI TENANT MONUMENT PROJECT DATE SINGLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 10 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 31 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN Refer to Exhibit I I MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT Diamond Bar Blvd. Frontage (MF) Maximum Height of 7'-6" above sidewalk grade Sign Area Maximum 24 Sq. Ft. (4 tenants identified - 6 sq. ft. maximum each) Setback minimum 2' from Property line 1/10/2007 I Page 32 i s COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER QUANTITY Z DOUBLE SIDED SIGN SIGN COLORS MATCH BUILDINGS SIGN STURCTURE - STUCCO FINISH SIGN CABINETS - PAINT FINISH CA) 1(1673 BARRISTER WHITE ® 1(1548 BEACHCOMBER © 1(1422 SAND MOTIF ® BENIAMINE MOORE BM -C65 DEEP BRONZE NON ILLUMINATED BACKGROUNDS 6'-6"-0" X 16" 2" DEEP PANEL BM - DEEP BRONZE PAINT ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICS ILLUMINATED FACE 8' 8" HI( ADDRE NUMER 2' CABINET WITF DIMENSIONAL GRAN ILLUMINATED FAC MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 2'-0 — f 1'-0 SHOP TENANT Adk 9'-0" 11 MONUMENT SIGN 8" LETTERS CORPORATE LETTERS OR FONT: GIL SANS MEDIUM SINGLE LINE OF TEXT ONLY MULTI -TENANT MONUMENT PROJECT I DATE SINGLE SIDED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MICHAEL I. M�LAUGHLIN &ASSOCIATES MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 11 DESIGN STUDIO 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE. CA 92054 310 247 2730 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrender1@mec.com Page 33 f COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN Multi -Tenant Signs There are 3 types of In-line shops, with unique architectural features that determine wall sign specifications; 1) Shops D, In-line shops as part of freestanding buildings, 2) Shops E, adjacent to major tenants and 3) Shops F. within "The Courtyard". Tenants within Shops D, freestanding buildings shall be permitted Business identification signs on leasehold frontage, maximum of up to 3 signs building elevations. Tenants within Shops E and F shall be permitted one Business identification wall sign, located at the primary entry to the lease space. Secondary sign may be permitted when frontage exceeds 50 lineal feet. 4.5.2 Objective Signs shall consist of business name and or graphic logo only. Additional sign content may be allowed subject to approval by Landlord and the City of Diamond Bar. 4.5.3 Design All business identification wall signs shall be fabricated as channel letters. Logos, symbols or descriptive phrases shall not exceed 25% of the sign area width. Logo graphics, symbols, and/or letters may be illuminated; Background areas within the logo shall not be illuminated. Wall signs shall be generally limited to a single line of text. Two lines of text may be considered for registered trademarks. Refer to Exhibit 12. MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS ( Shops D-1) Maximum Letter Height of 24" - With Logo Graphic 30" Maximum Sign Height 60" for a logo graphic only Sign Area Maximum 50 Sq. Ft. (I sq. ft. per lineal foot of frontage) 1 1/10/2007 l.. 1 f Page 34 ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER ■ ■ PRIMARY SIGN LOCATIONS ■ MULTI -TENANT SHOP D1 24" MAXIMUM ■ ■ � o o Bo ■ ■ SECONDARY SIGN LOCATIONS 18" MAXIMUM ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SECONDARY 24" MAXIMUM OR SIGN LOCATIONS 60" MAXIMUM GRAPHIC ■ ■ a o 0 ■ ■ o SCALE 10' ■ MIICHHAECL J. MILAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES M ■ FVI4./ITE0.PREN,�E8TUF,U10 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE. CA 92054 ■ 760.722.7020P760.722.7019F r1 mjmrende@mac.com ■ MASTER SIGN PLAN 1 SQ. FT. OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAL FOOT OF LEASEHOLD WIDTH/FRONTAGE 24" MAXIMUM III A 18" MAXIMUM — — — J 1/10/2007 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS SHOPS D-1 18" MAXIMUM 18" MAXIMUM 18" MAXIMUM 60" MAXIMUM GRAPHIC 0 1 1 E SECOI�, SIGN LOC 18" MAXIMUM MULTI -TENANT SIGN LOCATIONS PROJECT DATE SHOP BUILDING D-1 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 13 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 35 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN Refer to Exhibit 13 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS ( Shops D-2) Maximum Letter Height of 18" - Logo Graphic 22.5" for second story business identification. Restaurant at Shop D-2 permitted Maximum Letter Height of 36" Sign Area Maximum SO Sq. Ft. (1 sq. ft. per lineal foot of frontage) Page 36 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER PRIMARY SIGN LOCATIONS MULTI -TENANT SHOP D2 PRIMARY SIGN LOCATIONS 36" LETTER/LO( HEIGHT SECONDARY SIGN LOCATION! SECONDARY SIGN LOCATIONS 0 SCALE 10' MASTER SIGN PIAN 1 50. FT. OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAL FOOT OF LEASEHOLD WIDTH/FRONTAGE 36" LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 1/10/2007 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS SHOPS D-2 SOUTH ELEVATION E.L. 40-0 NORTH ELEVATION FOUNTAIN SPRINGS RD. WEST ELEVATION MICHAEL J. MCLALIGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760. 722.7019F mjmrender 1@maa.tom " LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT 18" LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT NON -ILLUMINATED " LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT )N -ILLUMINATED 18" LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT JON -ILLUMINATED EAST ELEVATION MULTI -TENANT SIGN LOCATIONS PROJECT DATE SHOP BUILDING D-2 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 12 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 37 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN Refer to Exhibit 14 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS (Shops E) Maximum Letter Height of 24" - Combined with Logo Graphic, 30" Maximum Sign Height 42" for a logo graphic only Leasehold frontage greater than 50 lineal feet may be permitted a secondary sign when sign area is restricted by architectural features Secondary sign shall not exceed 14" letter height Sign Area Maximum 35 Sq. Ft. with leasehold width up to 50' Tenant s with leasehold width greater than 50' shall be permitted a maximum of 50 sq.ft. of sign area fn f. f r Page 38 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER TYPICAL LEASEHOLD WIDTH OF 50 FEET MAXIMUM SIGN AREA 35 SQ.FT. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS MAY REQUIRE SECONDARY SIGN AREA PRIMARY — SIGN AREA EQ. EQ. 01 II II 1 II 1 J 35 SQ.FT. MAXIMUM SIGN AREA WHEN SUITES ARE COMBINED MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 TYPICAL SHOP TENANT WALL SIGNS SECONDARY SIGN AREA F_ 14" MAXIMUM � 0 SCALE 10' SHOPS E 0 SCALE 20' MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAV -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjm render l @m ac.cnm MAJOR A SHOPS E MULTI -TENANT SIGN LOCATIONS PROJECT DATE SHOP BUILDINGS E TYPICAL COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 14 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 39 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER r MASTER SIGN PLAN I/IC/2007 r Multi -Tenant Wall Signs at the COURTYARD Wall signs at The Courtyard shall be constructed with a sign shelf. Refer to Exhibit 15 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS (Shops F) r Maximum Letter Height of IS" r Sign Area Maximum 22 Sq. Ft. (Limited by architectural features) f Page 40 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER NvASTER SIGN PLAN m MAXIMUM SIGNS FOR THE COURTYARD AREA OF COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER. 1/10/2007 MULTI -TENANT WALL SIGNS O SHOPS F t$ -517'-3' ON CENTER EQUAL EQUAL EQUAL EQUAL EQUAL 10'-2" , TYPICAL SCALE MAXIMUM SIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR "COURTYARD" TENANTS ONLY 14'-8" T 18" MAX. TENANT SIGNAGE TSIGN SHELF PAINT TO MATCH 6 MAX. WINDOW STORE FRONT COLOR ELEVATION OPTIONAL STAND-0FFS PLAN VIEW INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS ATTACHED TO "SIGN SHELF" OPTIONAL DESIGN LAYOUTS �.�,_R_ESTAURANT Tenant Si INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS ATTACHED TO "SIGN SHELF" INCORPORATING LOWER CASE FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS LETTERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'-0" MAXIMUM 3'-6" X 2'-0" AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE LOGO OR MESSAGE SIGNS "SIGN SHELF" 25% OF PERMITTED SIGN WIDTH MICHAEL J. M�LAUGHLIN & A5rr30�CIATES D L S l C N A T U V I O MULTI -TENANT SIGN LOCATIONS COURTYARD PROJECTDATE [COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 ADDRESS EXHIBIT 15 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 310 247 2730 _ 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com Page 41 t COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 f 1 4.6 Courtyard Identification 4.6.1 Location Shops F An architectural accent sign to identify shops with the courtyard area of the center. Refer to Exhibit 16 WALL SIGN Maximum Height of 4'-0" Sign Area Maximum 64 Sq. Ft. COUNTRY I-I[LS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 SIGN FOR THE COURTYARD IDENTIFICATION AT COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER EXPOSED NEON "THE COURTYARD" TOWER SIGN BLUEGREEN COLOR NEON ON METALIC BRONZE BACKGROUND OPEN FACE CHANNEL LETTER/SHAPE EXPOSED NEON THE SIGN SHALL BE CENTERED HORIZONTALLY ON THE TOWER WALL. rmor�vl Gl 0 10` SCALE MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAT-FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mJmrenderl@mac.com TOP OF SIGN 20'-3" ABOVE GRADE. CHANNEL LETTER BRONZE RETURN EXPOSED NEON COURTYARD IDENTIFICATION SHOPS F 1/4- ANCHOR FLEXCONDUIT s ON/OFF SWITCH U.L. APPROVED TRANSFORMER COURTYARD IDENTIFICATION PROJECT I DATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT �6 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 43 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 4.7 In -Line Shops, Under Canopy Sign 4.7.1 Location In -Line Shop Tenants shall be permitted an under canopy sign located at primary business entry. The sign may incorporate colors to compliment the business operations. Minimum clearance of 7' -6" to bottom of sign shall be provided for pedestrian clearance. Canopy signs are non -illuminated Refer to Exhibit 17 Sign Dimensions: 36" x 1 I" Page 44 1 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 1" THICK DOUG FIR SANDBLASTED REDWOOD PANEL WITH PAINTED RAISED COPY 8r BORDER. MOUNTED ONTO (2) STEEL RODS ATTACHED TO EYE BOLTS PAINTED RAISED BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION GRAPHIC 31-011 I 1 21-311 I I EQ 1 1 " 4.5„ TENANT NAME EQ MICHAEL J. MCL.AUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderlCmac.com FIELD CHECK TO VERIFY INSTALLATION LOCATION WITH MCC Realty Management, Inc. CENTER BETWEEN BACK OF COLUMN AND STOREFRONT 8'-0" CLEAR HEIGHT TYPICAL UNDER CANOPY MULTI TENANT SHOPS D,E&F 0 0 WELDED ALUMINUM HANGER ❑ 2'X 2" X 1/8" BASE o D CANOPY SOFFIT 1/2" SQUARE ALUM. TUBE W/SHACKLE —p- ATTACH TO SOFFIT 1 /4" BOLT S.S. 3/4" EYELET NYLON SECURED INTO COMPRESSION NUT ®� - —,D CEDAR SIGN 1/2" 1 REVEAL 114" THICK ROUTED OR 1-1 /2" CLEAR CEDAR APPLIED DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICS UNDER CANOPY SIGN PROJECTDATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 11 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 45 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 i 1 4.8 In -Line Shops, Window Signs 4.8.1 Location Permanent or temporary window signs are permitted in the primary window display area. Signs must be located within the glass panel area and compatible with glass i dimensions and window mullion locations. No window signs shall be displayed on the storefront doors. Decorative treatment of lower storefront glass may be considered. Any modification to the storefront glass shall be consistent with the interior and exterior design and monochromatic in color. 4.8.2 Objective The purpose of window signs is to provide an attractive and effective means of identifying the products or services provided within. i 4.8.3 Design A maximum of 4 window signs is permitted per tenant shop leasehold. Maximum window sign area shall be equal to 25% or the window area and no closer 1 than 6" to window frame. Window sign material permitted shall be limited to vinyl graphics, ceiling suspended signs of metal, acrylic or printed banner fabric. Ceiling signs may be hung with either i wire or cable that has minimal visual impact. The use of chains, tape, suction cups or similar attachment methods will not be allowed. Refer to Exhibit 18 ! ! ! t Page 46 COUNTRW HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1 /' 0/2007 WINDOW SIGNS WINDOW SIGN: Shop SHOPS WINDOW SIGNS PERMANENT & TEMPORARY QUANTITY: MAXIMUM OF 4 WINDOW SIGNS PER TENANT LEASHOLD SIGN AREA: 250% OF THE WINDOW PANEL WITHIN THE PRIMARY WINDOW DISPLAY AREA LOCATION: LOCATED WITHIN LEASE SPACE AT PRIMARY WINDOW DISPLAY GLASS AND COMPATABLE WITYH GLASS DIMENSIONS AND WINDOW MULLION LOCATIONS. COLOR: DESIGN AND MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. MATERIALS. VINYL GRAPHICS, SUSPENDED SIGN OF ACRYLIC, FORMBOARD OR BANNER FABRIC SIGNS MAY BE HUNG WITH EITHER WIRE OR CABLE WITH MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT. THE USE OF TAPE, SUCTION CUPS OR CHAIN IS NOT ALLOWED. Ren�antSign IIIIIIIIINIMIAM NO WINDOW SIGNS MAXIMUM WINDOW SIGN ONE SIGN FOR DISPLAYED ON THE AREA SHALL BE NO MORE LEASIING INFORMATION STOREFRONT DOORS THAN 25% OF THE PER STOREFRONT WIDTH WINDOW PANEL AREA TEMPORARY SEASONAL DISPLAY WINDOW TREATMENTS THAT EXTEND FROM ONE PANEL OF GLASS TO ANOTHER SHALL BE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE LANDLORD OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. WINDOW SIGNS PROJECT DATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MICHAEL J. M�LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 18 D E S I G N A T U D I 0 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 310 247 2730 760.722.7020P 760. 722, 701 9F mjmrenderl�mac.com Page 47 I COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 I r 4.9 Operation Signs 4.9.1 Location Signs required for way finding within Country Hills Town Center businesses will be located to maximize visibility and provide ADA accessibility and traffic direction. Refer to Exhibit 9 for traffic direction sign in driveway median. 4.9.2 Objective The signs will provide notice for state and local code enforcement, speed limits and information required for the safe traffic flow. Business identification may be indicated on the signs. 4.9.3 Design. Maximum sign area for Operational Signs is eight (8) square feet. The operational signs shall be designed to meet the minimum requirements for readability, Traffic direction monument signs, such as "Drive Thru" shall use colors and materials that compliment the architecture and/or site improvements. Refer to Exhibit 19 Refer to Appendix A- I for sign standards and ADA accessibility plan Refer to Appendix A-2 for traffic control / direction sign standards ■ COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER ■ BUILDING ADDRESS i 14" HIGH NUMERALS 1/2" THICK ACRYLIC NUMERALS ■4603 AT DARK BRONZE PAINT FINISH PIN MOUNTI/4" OFF WALL SURFACE ARAPET VISIBLE LFR M PILDING RIMARY RNER PENTRY DRIVEWAY ■ ■ ■ CODE/NOTICE 60" TOP OF INSTALLED SIGN PRIVATE PROPERTY PARKING FOR GUESTS & EMPLOYEES OF COUNTRY HILLS TOWN (ENTER ONLY ALL VEHICLES MUST PARK IN STALLS DESIGNATED FOR PARKING ONLY M UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES NOT DISPLAYING NO PARKING IN RED ZONES C.V.C. 22500.1- C.V.C. 22658A VEHICLES IN VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING WILL BE CITED AND TOWED AWAY AT VEHICLE OWNER'S EXPENSE (.V.(. 22500.1- 21511.8 INFORMATION CONCERNING TOWED VEHICLES (ALL DIAMOND BAR SHERIFF (909) 839-1085 NO TRESPASSING NO RECREATIONAL USE OF SKATES, BICYCLES, SKATEBOARDS, OR SCOOTERS PERMITTED (.P. C. 602 24" x 44" PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGN ALUMINUM SIGN PANEL OFF-WHITE BACKGROUND BLACK & COLOR GRAPHICS PER CODE REQUIREMENTS LOCATED AT PROJECT DRIVEWAYS SIGN COMBINES NOTICE FOR PLACARDS REQUIRED FOR PARKING IN DESIGNATED PARKING AREAS. NOTICE FOR FIRE LANE MARKINGS AND NO PARKING IN RED ZONES. THE PHONE NUMBER FOR THE DIAMOND BAR SHERIFF IS IDENTIFIED FOR TOWED VEHICLES ADDITIONALLY NOTICE FOR NO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES ARE INDICATIED. MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DLSIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 91054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mlmrenderl@mac.com Nv ASTER SIGN PIAN SUITE IDENTIFICATION PRIMARY ENTRY MATERIALS: MATTE WHITE VINYL ON ENTRY GLASS COPY: 8" HIGH SUITE LETTER OR ADDRESS TYPE FACE: FUTURA BOOK LOCATION: ADDRESS CENTERED OVER ENTRY TENANT HOURS OF OPERATION ON GLASS PANEL ADJACENT TO ENTRY DOOR A 4;; —HO AR -S 12" 4'-6" C NO SOLICITING NO TRESPASSING NO RECREATIONAL USE OF SKATES, BICYCLES, SKATEBOARDS, OR SCOOTERS PERMRTED. VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSECUTED EP.E Nf--r,—,oNm,� 1/10/2007 SERVICE DOOR MATERIALS: MATTE WHITE VINYL IN CONTRASTING COLORS ON SERVICE DOOR. COPY: 4" HIGH SUITE ADDRESS 2" TENANT NAME TYPE FACE: FUTURA BOOK CL 5'-0" 17" x 10-5/8" NO TRESPASSING SIGN ROUTED ACRYLIC SIGN PANEL COLOR TO COMPLIMENT ADJACENT BUILDING WALL COLOR WALL MOUNTED IN PEDESTRIAN AREAS A BUILDING ADDRESS - SUITE ADDRESS COUN TR HILLS TOWN CENTER D /20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 19 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 49 t COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 5.0 Professional Office Building 5.1.1 Location G j Multiple wall signs are permitted. A maximum of two (2) Primary business name sign shall identify the business. A maximum of two (2) secondary sign may be permitted to t identify the nature of the business or service. Wall signs of various sizes are anticipated.. i Primary Signs - Maximum Letter/Logo Height of 24" Two lines of text (56" maximum graphic height") Sign Area Maximum 125 Sq. Ft. Secondary Sign - Maximum Letter/Logo Height of 16" Single line of text only Sign Area Maximum 30 Sq. Ft. S. 1.2 Objective , The design specifications of the wall signs meet the minimum requirements for safe ' readability. Secondary sign reinforces entry location. S. 1.3 Design Wall signs shall be no closer to an architectural feature than 1/2 the letter height. This j may result in signs that will be less that the maximum graphic height permitted. j All business identification wall signs shall be fabricated as channel letters. Refer to Exhibit 20 Page 50 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 NORTH ELEVATION �Il�lhill�; ulli�;l! �Iil�� mrie lh NOT TO SCALE MICHAEL J. MCL.AUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760,722.7019F mJmrenderl@mac.com PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TENANT WALL 41 PRIMARY SIGN 24" HIGH CHANNEL LETTERS WO (2) LINES OF TEXT PERMITTED MAXI M 56" GRAPHIC HEIGHT ACRYLIC FACE RETURNS PAINTED DARK BRONZE CENTER ON WALL PANEL WEST ELEVATION PRIMARY SIGN SECONDARY SIGNS 16" HIGH CHANNEL LETTERS RETURNS PAINTED DARK BRONZE CENTER ON WALL ABOVE ENTRY EAST ELEVATION SOUTH PLAN PROFESSIONAL OFFICE FPROJECT I DATE TENANT WALL SIGN COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 10 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 51 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 6.0 Temporary Signs 6. 1.1 Location MASTER SIGN PLAN Two freestanding temporary signs shall be located 10' behind the right-of-way of the Diamond Bar Blvd. One sign located 40' north of the primary entry driveway and the second 40' south. Both signs shall be installed in locations that do not conflict with vehicular access line -of -site. 6.1.2 Objective The temporary signs shall combine Future Use and Construction information. They will provide notice of future facilities, leasing opportunities and Country Hills Town Center construction information. During the course of construction the sign may be used to list "opening soon" retail tenants as they become finalized. Temporary signs shall utilized during the lease -up of the center and removed upon completion of improvements/occupancy. 6.1.3 Design Temporary signs shall be installed parallel to the adjacent arterial street. Each sign provides for 50 square feet of sign area. The maximum sign height shall be 6 feet. Refer to Exhibit 21 i Page 52 { COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 MICHAEL J. McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND 'Ay -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92.054 760.722.7020P 760.712.7019F mj--d-l@m- com TEMPORARY SIGN SINGLE SIDED 50 SO. FT, 6' MAXIMUM HEIGHT INSTALL PARALLEL TO STREET TEMPORARY MARKETING SIGN T SETBACK FROM R.O.W. PROPERTY LINE TEMPORARY MARKETING SIGN PROJECT I DATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER12/20/06 Page 53 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 7.0 Seasonal Event Signs Seasonal/special event signs are governed by the City of Diamond Bar Development Code Sec. 22.36.120 (f). Temporary signs, banners, Flags and other advertising devices may be installed on an occupant's premises for a maximum of 14 days per event. The event signs are permitted for 6 periods per calendar year with a minimum of 30 days between events. Total temporary and permanent sign area shall not exceed 50 square feet. Event signs shall not create safety hazards or block signs identifying adjoining establishments. Seasonal display shall be permitted within the common areas of Country Hills Town Center including decorative lighting and pole mounted banners. Refer to Appendix A-8. Seasonal window treatments and signs that extend from one window glass to another shall be permitted subject to review and approval of Landlord. 1/10/2007 Page 54 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 111012007 ALL SEASONAL /SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS ARE GOVERENED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEVELOPMENT CODE SE(. 22.36.120 (F). BANNER SIGN AREA IS LIMITED TO 50 SOFT. Single Double Rectangle Rectangle Engineered for winds in excess of 70 MPH Built-in 5 cant and adjustable brackets mean your banners stay tight and professional looking. Both systems have innovative arm designs making them extremely easy to install or change banners. Fiberglass models have wind -spill feature surpassing even the most stringent Optional systems to meet your needs and budget Economy aluminum brackets and coated steel arms MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES FOR IMAGE, INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019E mjmrenderl@mac cam SEASONAL / EVENT BANNERS Choose from 2 styles of quality systems for superior pole mounted displays? Built-in cant and tensioning keeps banners tout! TYPICAL LIGHT STANDARD BANNER 18" X 48" SEASONAL / EVENT BANNERS PROJECT DATE COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/8/0 6 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS EXHIBIT 12 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 310 247 2730 Page 55 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 { { 8.0 Prohibited Signs 8.1 Immoral or Unlawful Advertising C' Exhibiting, posting, displaying, or causing to be exhibited, posted or displayed, upon any sign anything of obscene, indecent, or immoral nature or unlawful activity shall be prohibited. { 8.2 Signs on Doors or Windows A sign mounted within 12" of windows or doors that is oriented outward is considered a { window or door sign. 8.3 Vehicle Signs No vehicle, including trailers, shall be parked at Country Hills Town Center for the principal purpose of advertising or display. All vans and trucks owned and operated by t tenants/occupants of the Country Hills Town Center shall be parked in the parking area away from surrounding public streets. 8.4 City of Diamond Bar Development Code r Tenant shall become familiar and comply with the City of Diamond Bar Development Code, Section 22.36.080. { 9.0 General Installation Requirements [ 9.1 Staging, parking and loading of materials at Country Hills Town Center may be severely { restricted. Material delivery times will need to be scheduled through Landlord designated tenant services representative 72 hours in advance. { 9.2 Tenant's contractor shall be responsible for the prompt clean up, repair and/or replacement of any damages to any work at Country Hills Town Center caused by tenant's improvement work. ° 9.3 All work areas must be kept free and clear of trash and debris at all times. { r Page 55 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER VASTER SIGN PLAN 1 /' 0/2007 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN APPENDIX A. I Way finding Access Plan for Persons with Disabilities A.I A.2 Traffic Control Direction Sign A.2 Page 57 COUNTRY FIILLS TOWN CENTER MASTER SIGN PLAN 1/10/2007 ACCESSIBILITY WAY FINDING LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELS 2 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP 18722 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 247 PAGES 28 TO 31 INCLUDNE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF - - THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY KOM NORTH SCALE: 1- 50 0 2T 50 10D , ' V L �e ��= „ IN-LINE SHOPS 0? n� �7 ,� II a MARKET ;INP MAIOR _ THE COURTYARD y U SHOP I L�'F- I Z. L I IN F MA10R I MAJOR I'I ¢N ._. �. -�...`�. - .w.. 'TOWER • Z e _r T6VVR IF 9 L� 1w r o 0 0 I I FREESTANDING BLDG_ PROFESSIONAL I - � IN -- LINE S HOPS OFFICE o D-2 I I, i ----- -- '-- "�•� — — r!— ---r w�v i rl u D-2 — C-1 I_ _ I C-2 i NOT I [ _ _ I � J \\ l _�.� �. NOT APART jL 1 - DIAMOND BAR BLVD. SIGN PANELS 1 & 2 INSTALLED - 12" BACK OF SIDEWALK I ' ' I 1 ALL SIGNS INSTALLED A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36" ffL I I ABOVE GRADE TO CENTER OF SIGN. 12" X 12" SIGN PANEL a DARK BLUE BACKGROUND WHITE GRAPHICS 1" MINIMUM LETTER HEIGHT MICHAEL J. MCL.AUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES DESIGN STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2017 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com ©12" X 12" SIGN PANEL © 6" X 10" SIGN PANEL DARK BLUE BACKGROUND DARK BLUE BACKGROUND WHITE GRAPHICS WHITE GRAPHICS 1" MINIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 1" MINIMUM LETTER HEIGHT ADA WAY -FINDING FPROJECT DATE ACCESS PLAN COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS APPENDIX 1 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 58 COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER QUANTITY 1 SINGLE SIDED SIGN Z" DEEP SIGN CABINET MEDIUM BRONZE PAINT FINISH 3" MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT .090" DIRECTIONAL PANELS MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO ALLOW FOR TENANT CHANGES 1/2" THICK ARROWS ALL GRAPHICS ARE WHITE REFLECTIVE SIGN STRUCTURE PAINT BM -DEEP BRONZE 4'-0" OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT ABOVE _ TOP OF DRIVEWAY CURB ELDORADO SMOKEY M( LEDGESTONE MASTER SIGN PLAN 2 COUNTRY HILLS TENANTS 1/10/200/ TRAFFIC CONTROL DIRECTION SIGN f • - 3 � r �1 DRIVE-THRU PAD TENANTS SHALL SUBMIT A REVISED SIGN PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY ARCHITECTURAL OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THE SIGN PLAN SHALL INCORPORATE ALL PLANNED AND EXISTING SIGNS AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDLORD AND CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. DRIVE THRU SIGNS PERMITTED FOR PAD TENANTS C-1, C-2 & D2 4'-0" OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT ABOVE TOP OF DRIVEWAY CURB LJRI V L VV/Al IY1LV1711 `I MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES 14.8I6N STUDIO FOR IMAGE. INTERPRETATIVE AND WAY -FINDING SIGNS 2047 JANET CIRCLE OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 760.722.7020P 760.722.7019F mjmrenderl@mac.com ELIMINATE NOTICE SIGNS WHICH ARE DUPLICATED AT PROJECT ENTRY DRIVEWAYS TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGN 7 PROJECT DATE SINGLE SIDED NON -ILLUMINATED COUNTRY HILLS TOWN CENTER 12/20/06 MCC REALTY INVESTMENT CO., INC. ADDRESS APPENDIX 1 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 214 2825 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 _ 310 247 2730 Page 59 Agenda # 8.1 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Man TITLE: Resolution No. 2007 -XX approvin Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Budget Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted Resolution #2006-54 on June 20, 2006 approving the FY06-07 Municipal Budget. The City Council has also approved additional appropriations as they have occurred throughout the year It is City policy for staff and the City Council to periodically review the annual budget and make adjustment as deemed necessary. DISCUSSION: The City's current adopted General Fund Budget for FY06-07 shows anticipated resources of $23,210,360. It is recommended that the resource estimate be increased by $572,420 to $23,782,780. The current approved General Fund appropriations budget equals $22,943,530. It is recommended that this budget be increased by $167,360 to $23,110,890. These recommended changes in the General Fund estimated resources and appropriations will result in an estimated $24,271,026, in General Fund unreserved fund balance at the end of the fiscal year. Current Budget Amendment Adjusted Budget Resources Annual Revenue $19,880,760 $572,420 $20,453,180 Use of Fund Balance Reserve 3,329,600 3,329,600 Total Resources $23,210,360 $572,420 $23,782,780 Total Appropriations 22,943,530 167,360 23,110,890 Impact to Fund Balance $266,830 $405,060 $671,890 Unreserved Fund Balance @ Beg of FY $27,566,452 $27,566,452 Less Prior Year Encumbrances C/O (489,946) (489,946) Less Uses of Unreserved Fund Bal (3,477,370) (3,477,370) Estimated Unreserved Fund Bal @ End of FY $23,865,966 $405,060 $24,271,026 General Fund Revenues: When the FY06-07 Budget was adopted careful consideration went into the preparation of the revenue estimates. There have been changes made to these estimates based on actual receipts and changes in the economy. The Property Taxes and Other Taxes categories have been slightly adjusted to reflect estimates that more closely reflect the actual amounts received so far this fiscal year. State Subventions have been increased by $138,450 to reflect higher than anticipated receipts of VLF — Property Tax in Lieu revenues. Other major revenue adjustments include adjustments to both Planning Developer Fees and Traffic Mitigation fees which have been received as a result of the Target and Brookfield Homes developments. On page 2 of Exhibit A there are brief explanations of the other adjustments to the revenue estimates. General Fund Expenditures: The changes to the General Fund expenditures are also outlined in Exhibit A. Highlights of the changes in appropriations are: • Special Legal Services has been increased to cover additional costs associated with various lawsuits the City is currently involved in. General Government - Professional Services has been increased to account for an unanticipated increase in property tax administration services. The County recoups the cost of managing the property tax collections and allocations from Cities, Districts and Government Agencies by prorating their costs based on property tax allocations. Since the City is now receiving additional property tax allocations as a replacement of some of the sales tax revenue and motor vehicle fees the City's prorated property tax administration expense has increased. According to the triple flip law the administration fees weren't supposed to be increased for two years. There is some debate whether the County should have started charging these higher administration costs this fiscal year or next. • Law Enforcement — Special Event Fees has been increased by $70,000 to account for Calvary Chapel traffic control charges which is directly offset by an increase in revenue. • Building and Safety contract services budget was decreased by $20,450 to partially fund the new City Permit Technician position which was formerly funded by the building and safety services provider. Salaries and benefits in Community Services are being increased by $86,310. This is due to the elimination of staff charges to the Landscape Maintenance Districts (LLADs). Since the LLADs costs are increasing and resources are limited, it is recommended that the staff time to administer these districts be charged to the General Fund this fiscal year. To offset these additional costs to the General Fund the project to landscape the City owned property located at Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard is recommended to be eliminated. 2 • The decreases in Public Works and Engineering contract services are due to less than anticipated development activities requiring inspection and plan check services. Since these costs are fee driven, there has also been a reduction in related fee revenues. There are brief explanations of the other adjustments to the General Fund appropriations on page 3 of Exhibit A. Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) and Other Funds: The Mid Year Budget Amendment includes changes to the City's CIP program resulting in a net increase of $60,000. The City received repayment of Prop 42 — Traffic Congestion Relief Funds that were borrowed by the State FY03-04 and FY04-05. Since the funds must be used for transportation projects it is proposed that the most of the funding of Prospectors Rd -Sunset Crossing project be changed from primarily Gas Tax ($450,000 to $12,000) to Traffic Congestion Relief Funds ($0 to $438,000). The Interconnect Links project is being increased by $150,000 to $650,000. This increase will be funded from the Prop A — Transit Fund which will have and estimate fund balance reserve after this use of $1,019,326. As mentioned earlier the other change to the CIP is the removal the landscape improvements on the City owned land located at Brea Canyon Road/Diamond Bar Blvd which is a reduction of $90,000. The Gas Tax, Prop A — Transit, and Traffic Congestion Relief funds have all been adjusted according to the changes proposed in the CIP program. In addition, the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund budget has been changed to include the revenue associated with the repayment by the State. In addition the interest revenue anticipated has been increase due to higher cash balances in the fund. As mentioned earlier, in an effort to keep from raising assessments for the City's LLADs and to maintain current standards it is recommended that staff charges to administer the assessment districts would be borne by the General Fund this fiscal year. As a result the LLAD funds have been adjusted accordingly. Movies Under the Stars Program - The City Council requested that a Movies Under the Stars program considered for implementation during the 2007 Concerts in the Park season. A proposal has been prepared for consideration. The program would provide movies in the park for families free of charge. Movies would be presented after the conclusion of concerts at Sycamore Canyon Park. It is anticipated that if approved, the movie screen and projector along with the flyers and posters would be purchased this fiscal year at a total anticipated cost of $24,300. Anticipated costs for FY07-08 would be approximately $4,000 and if approved will be included in the FY07-08 proposed budget. It is recommended that the Council review the proposal and approve a Movies Under the Stars program. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Fund The Mid -Year Budget Amendment includes an increase in estimated revenue for the General Fund in the amount of $572,420 to account for various items outlined in Exhibit A. It also includes an increase in General Fund annual appropriations in the amount of $167,360 also outlined in Exhibit A. Capital Improvement Projects Changes to the Capital Improvement Projects (Exhibit B) list include a change in funding of the Prospectors Rd — Sunset Crossing to Golden Springs project from primarily Gas Tax to Traffic Congestion Relief Funds; the Interconnect Links project is being increased by $150,000 to $650,000 to be funded from Prop A — Transit Funds; and the removal of funds for the landscape improvements at Brea Canyon Road/Diamond Bar Blvd. Special Funds Changes to the other funds are outlined in Exhibit A. The following is a brief recap of the changes: Special Funds Gas Tax Fund Prop A Transit Fd Traffic Congestion Relief Fd LLAD #38 Fund LLAD #39 Fund LLAD #41 Fund Capital Improvement Projects Fd Total Special Fund Changes General Fund Changes Grand Totals Revenue Expenditures Fund Bal Increase/ Increase/ Net Increase (Decrease) (Decrease) (Decrease) (438,000) 438,000 150,000 (150,000) 444,520 438,000 6,520 (29,130) 29,130 (29,130) 29,130 (29,130) 29,130 60,000 60,000 0 $504,520 $122,610 $381,910 572,420 167,360 405,060 $1,076,940 $289,970 $786,970 Overall the Mid Year Budget amendment proposes an increase in Estimated Revenue of $1,076,940 for all funds and an overall increase in Appropriations of $289,970 for all funds. Other General Fund Consideration: Not included in the mid year budget amendment worksheets is the cost of implementing a Movie Under the Stars program (Exhibit C). If the City Council chooses to add this program the anticipated cost for FY06-07 would be $24,300 and the mid year budget amendment will be modified accordingly. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Finance birebtor Assistant City Manager Attachments: Resolution and Exhibit A - Budget Worksheets 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE FY06-07 MUNICIPAL BUDGET. WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 2006-54, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving and adopting a budget for the City of Diamond Bar for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2007 including maintenance and operations, special funds and capital improvements and appropriating funds for accounts departments, divisions, object and purposes therein set forth (herein referred to as the "Budget"); and WHEREAS, the City Council may choose to amend the Budget from time to time throughout the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the FY 2006-07 Budget is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Amendment has been discussed by the City Council at a City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the FY06-07 Annual Budget be amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 2. There are hereby appropriated for obligations and expenditures by the City Manager the amounts shown on the attached Exhibit. All obligations and expenditures shall be incurred and made in the manner provided by the provisions of State law and City ordinances and resolutions applicable to purchasing and contracting. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 2007. Steve Tye, Mayor 5 I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 2007, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar z Exhibit A CITY OF DIAMOND BAR GENERAL FUND BUDGET AMENDMENT SUMMARY FY 2006-2007 APPROPRIATIONS City Council City Attorney City Manager/City Clerk Finance Human Resources Information Systems General Government Public Information Law Enforcement Volunteer Patrol Fire Protection Animal Control Emergency Preparedness Community Dev./Planning Building & Safety Neighborhood Improvement Economic Development Community Services Diamond Bar Center - Operations Park Operations Recreation Public Works Engineering Road Maintenance Landscape Maintenance Transfer -Out Other Funds Total Appropriations 171,600 Original Previous Current 171,600 Adjusted 27,566,452 Budget Adjustments Budget Amendment Budget ESTIMATED RESOURCES (3,329,600) 936,140 420,300 Est Unreserved Fd Bal @ End of FY 420,300 Property Taxes 3,315,000 241,415 3,315,000 20,000 3,335,000 Other Taxes 6,085,000 275,000 6,085,000 (25,000) 6,060,000 State Subventions 3,871,525 1,647,640 3,871,525 138,450 4,009,975 From other Agencies 70,000 305,000 375,000 18,970 393,970 Fines and Forfeitures 617,500 5,057,000 617,500 (22,000) 595,500 Building Fees 750,400 40,900 750,400 40,900 750,400 Planning Fees 410,000 410,000 290,000 700,000 Engineering Fees 967,000 43,290 967,000 154,000 1,121,000 Recreation Fees 676,385 676,385 482,600 676,385 Special Event Fees 0 462,150 0 70,000 70,000 Rents & Concessions 629,900 715,850 629,900 (72,000) 557,900 Investment Revenue 625,000 31,000 625,000 86,310 625,000 Other Revenues 28,000 2,000 30,000 884,730 30,000 Transfers -In Other Funds 1,483,050 45,000 1,528,050 1,503,055 1,528,050 Reserved Fund Balance - Econ Dev 715,850 1,517,055 715,850 715,850 Reserved Fund Balance - CIP 2,613,750 316,150 2,613,750 316,150 2,613,750 Total Resources 22,858,360 352,000 23,210,360 572,420 23,782,780 APPROPRIATIONS City Council City Attorney City Manager/City Clerk Finance Human Resources Information Systems General Government Public Information Law Enforcement Volunteer Patrol Fire Protection Animal Control Emergency Preparedness Community Dev./Planning Building & Safety Neighborhood Improvement Economic Development Community Services Diamond Bar Center - Operations Park Operations Recreation Public Works Engineering Road Maintenance Landscape Maintenance Transfer -Out Other Funds Total Appropriations 171,600 777,600 171,600 405,060 671,890 171,600 165,000 27,566,452 165,000 50,000 215,000 936,140 (489,946) 936,140 (3,329,600) 936,140 420,300 Est Unreserved Fd Bal @ End of FY 420,300 ($658,540) $23,865,966 420,300 241,415 241,415 241,415 1,268,590 275,000 1,543,590 6,500 1,550,090 1,647,640 1,647,640 65,000 1,712,640 577,790 577,790 577,790 4,987,000 4,987,000 70,000 5,057,000 9,250 9,250 9,250 40,900 40,900 40,900 112,500 112,500 112,500 43,290 43,290 43,290 916,630 916,630 916,630 482,600 482,600 (20,450) 462,150 356,500 356,500 356,500 715,850 715,850 715,850 470,760 31,000 501,760 86,310 588,070 884,730 884,730 884,730 730,510 90,000 820,510 820,510 1,503,055 14,000 1,517,055 1,517,055 647,890 647,890 647,890 316,150 316,150 316,150 1,135,750 1,135,750 1,135,750 341,820 341,820 341,820 2,957,100 452 770 3,409,870 (90,000) 3,319,870 22,080,760 862,770 22,943,530 167,360 23,110,890 Est. Excess Resources over Approp. 777,600 (510,770) 266,830 405,060 671,890 Unreserved Fund Balance @ Beg of FY 27,566,452 27,566,452 27,566,452 Less Prior Year Encumbrances Carried Over (489,946) (489,946) (489,946) Less Uses of Unreserved Fund Balance (3,329,600) (147,770) (3,477,370) 0 (3,477,370) Est Unreserved Fd Bal @ End of FY $24,524,506 ($658,540) $23,865,966 $405,060 $24,271,026 Page 1 Exhibit A Description Account # FY2006-07 BUDGET AMENDMENT GENERAL FUND REVENUE Current Mid Yr Adjusted Budget Amendment Budget Explanation Property Taxes Prior Year Prop Tax 30100 50,000 25,000 75,000 Budget Refinement Interest, Penalties, Delinq. 30250 20,000 (5,000) 15,000 Budget Refinement 20,000 Other Taxes Sales Tax Comp Fund 31011 1,000,000 50,000 1,050,000 Based On Higher Receipts Property Transfer Tax 31250 425,000 (75,000) 350,000 Based On Lower Receipts (25,000) State Subventions VLF Property Tax in Lieu 31701 3,868,000 138,450 4,006,450 Based On Higher Receipts 138,450 From Other Agencies Fed Homeland Security 31625 0 18,970 18,970 Base on Actual Receipt 18,970 Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle Code Fines 32150 390,000 (20,000) 370,000 Budget Refinement General Fines 32200 22,000 (2,000) 20,000 Budget Refinement (22,000) Planning Fees Developer Fees 34550 300,000 290,000 590,000 Brookfield Homes Fees 290,000 Engineering Fees Plan Check Fees - Engr 34610 100,000 (50,000) 50,000 Budget Refinement Encroachment Permit - Engr 34630 8,000 (2,000) 6,000 Budget Refinement Inspections - Engr 34640 80,000 (40,000) 40,000 Budget Refinement Traffic Mitigation - Engr 34660 704,000 246,000 950,000 Target & Brookfield Dev 154,000 Special Event Fees Special Events 34800 0 70,000 70,000 Budget Refinement - Calvary Chpl 70,000 Rents and Concessions Misc Rents & Concessions 36620 103,900 (72,000) 31,900 Cell site not constructed yet (72,000) $572,420 Page 2 Exhibit A FY2006-2007 BUDGET AMENDMENT GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES Current Mid Yr Adjusted Description Account # Budget Amendment Budget Explanation City Attorney (001-4020) Special Legal Svcs 44021 90,000 50,000 140,000 Increased Litigation 50,000 Information Systems (001-4070) Over Time Wages 40020 Telephone 42125 General Government (001-4090) Prof Services 44000 Law Enforcement (001-4411) CS - Sheriff / Special Events 45402 Building and Safety (001-5220) Contract Services 45000 Community Services (001-5310) 61,770 Salaries 40010 City Paid Benefits 40070 Retirement Benefits 40080 Worker's Compensation 40083 Short/Lng Term Disability 40084 Medicare/Soc Sec 40085 Benefit Allotment 40090 Public Works (001-5510) CS - Inspection Engineering (001-5551) CS -Plan Check Road Maintenance (001-5554) Prof Svcs - Engineering Misc Equipment Transfer Out (001-9915) Transfer out - CIP 40,020 2,600 5,000 3,900 6,500 98,100 65,000 65,000 40,000 70,000 70,000 404,600 (20,450) (20,450) 181,450 61,770 2,650 840 32,750 11,340 8,100 1,860 1,150 390 13,200 900 28,050 9,210 86,310 45227 60,000 (30,000) (30,000) 45223 75,000 (37,500) (37,500) 44520 50,000 4,000 46250 0 10,000 14,000 49250 3,066,520 (90,000) (90,000) $63,860 Page 3 42,620 Addnl IT Support necessary 8,900 Incr Phone Maint/Cell Phone Allow 163,100 Addnl Prop Tax Admin Chgs 110,000 Calvary Chapel Traffic Enforcement 384,150 Partial Funding of Permit Tech 243,220 LLADS Staff Charges 3,490 LLADS Staff Charges 44,090 LLADS Staff Charges 9,960 LLADS Staff Charges 1,540 LLADS Staff Charges 14,100 LLADS Staff Charges 37,260 LLADS Staff Charges 30,000 Budget Refinement 37,500 Budget Refinement 54,000 Incr Traffic Studies 10,000 Replace Stolen Equipment 2,976,520 Cancel Site XR Landscape Exhibit A FY2006-2007 BUDGET AMENDMENT SPECIAL FUNDS CHANGES Current Mid Yr Adjusted Description Account Budget Amendment Budget Explanation Gas Tax Fund (I 11) Expenditures Transfer out - CIP 49250 787,563 (438,000) 349,563 Funding Chg - Prospector's Rd Prop ATransit Fund (112) Expenditures Transfer out - CIP 49250 0 150,000 150,000 Increase Interconnect Project Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (117) Revenue Traffic Congestion Relief 31735 0 438,520 438,520 Prop 42 - Repayment Interest Revenue 36100 6,000 Increased Cash Balances 444,520 Expenditures Transfer out - CIP 49250 255,000 438,000 693,000 Funding Chg - Prospector's Rd LLAD #38 Fund (138) Expenditures Salaries 40010 20,950 (20,950) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd City Paid Benefits 40070 280 (280) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Retirement 40080 3,780 (3,780) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Worker's Comp. Exp. 40083 620 (620) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Short/Long Term Disability 40084 130 (130) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Medicare 40085 300 (300) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Cafeteria Benefits 40090 3,070 (3,070) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd (29,130) LLAD #39 Fund (139) Expenditures Salaries 40010 20,950 (20,950) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd City Paid Benefits 40070 280 (280) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Retirement 40080 3,780 (3,780) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Worker's Comp. Exp. 40083 620 (620) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Short/Long Term Disability 40084 130 (130) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Medicare 40085 300 (300) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Cafeteria Benefits 40090 3,070 (3,070) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd (29,130) LLAD#41 Fund (141) Expenditures Salaries 40010 20,950 (20,950) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd City Paid Benefits 40070 280 (280) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Retirement 40080 3,780 (3,780) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Worker's Comp. Exp. 40083 620 (620) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Short/Long Term Disability 40084 130 (130) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Medicare 40065 300 (300) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd Cafeteria Benefits 40090 3,070 (3,070) 0 Staff charged to Gen Fd (29,130) Page 4 Exhibit A FY2006-2007 BUDGET AMENDMENT SPECIAL FUNDS CHANGES Current Mid Yr Adjusted Description Account # Budget Amendment Budget Explanation CIP Fund (250) Revenue Transfer in - Gen Fund Transfer in - Gas Tax Transfer in - Prop A Transit Transfer in - Traffic Cngstn Expenditures Traffic Mgt/Safety Projects Landscape Improvements 39001 3,066,520 (90,000) 2,976,520 Cancel - Site XR Landscape 39111 769,600 (438,000) 331,600 Funding Chg - Prospector's Rd 39112 0 150,000 150,000 Increase Interconnect Project 39117 255,000 438,000 693,000 Chg in Slurry Seal Fding 60,000 46412 1,530,000 150,000 1,680,000 TS Mods/Intercon. - DBB @ Grnd 46416 536,150 (90,000) 446,150 Cancel Site XR Landscape 60,000 Page 5 Exhibit B CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST- Mid Year FY 06-07 2005 Fed Tr Cngstn Rif / TDA - Prop A - TEA -LU I STP. Approp Act State HES Developer Bikeways & Project # Project Description Total Cost Gen Fd Gas Tax Transit Prop C L (Sect 117) Program Fees Trails Street Improvement Projects n1 nas 18604' Grand Ave BB - Phase II, Montefino to Rolling Knl 1,68u,uuu Z43,uutl Total Cost General Fd CDBG Prop 12 Prop 40 Park Dev Fund LLAD 38 LLAD 39 LLAD 41 Miscellaneous Improvements "^ 19403 Sycamore Cyn - Slope Repair 305,000 53,672 18605 Grand Ave BB - Phase III, Ring Knl to E. City Limit 1,650,000 306,692 131,150 131,150 20705' Lorbeer Ball Field 768,000 521,636 23607 School Area Curb Ramp Installation 201,258 201,258 01406' Slurry Seal/Overlay - Area 2 748,000 273,400 219,600 150,000 255,000 01407 Slurry Seal/Overlay - Area 3 750,000 750,000 438,000 21006 Prospectors Rd - Sunset to Gkin Spgs 450,000 12,000 22706 Washington St. Cul -De -Sac 100,000 100,000 23906 Arterial Slurry Seal - Zone 1 300,000 300,000 Total - Street Improvement Projects 5,678,000 1,873,100 331,600 0 0 1,703,845 991,700 0 693,000 84,755 Traffic Management /Safety Projects 250'000 14699' Brea Cyn Cutoff @ SB 57 On/Off Ramp 250,000 22307 Neighborhood Traffic Management Mitigations 125,000 125,000 23007 DB Blvd/Golden Sprgs Mod 120,000 120,000 22907 BCR/Golden Sprgs Mod 120,000 120,000 23107 Golden Sprgs @Racquet Club 165,000 165,000 23207 Interconnect Links 650,000 150,000 500,000 23307 TC - Prspctrs Rd (SS Xng & Gdn Spgs) & 250,000 30,000 220,000 Sunset Xing Rd (DB Blvd & Prospector) Total -Traffic Projects 1,680,000 155,000 0 150,000 905,000 0 0 220,000 250,000 0 Total Road/Traffic Imp -FY06-07 7,358,000 2,028,100 331,600 150,000 905,000 1,703,845 991,700 220,000 943,000 84,755 Rivers & Mtns Pro ect a Project Description Total Cost General Fd CDBG Prop 12 Prop 40 Park Dev Fund ProA - SP Cons. Donations Parks and Rec Improvements 15704' Sycamore Cyn Pk - ADA Retrofit Phase III 1,536,880 50,000 691,880 795,000 25,000 21506' Pantera Park Storerooms, Restrooms & Drink Ftn 256,800 115,000 116,800 21606' Paul C. Grow ADA Retro -Construction 101,831 101,831 140,000 21706` Trail Access - DBC/Clear Crk @ Steep Cyn 140,000 23407 DBC - Emergency Generator 147,500 147,500 23507 Batting Cages - Peterson & Pantera Parks 149,650 149,650 TOTAL 2,332,661 147,500 101,831 165,000 0 958,330 795,000 140,000 25,000 TOTAL 1,702,408 751,150 201,258 0 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 FY 06-07 CIP Projects Grand Total $11,393,069 ' Carry -Over from FY05-06 Project # Project Description Total Cost General Fd CDBG Prop 12 Prop 40 Park Dev Fund LLAD 38 LLAD 39 LLAD 41 Miscellaneous Improvements 19403 Sycamore Cyn - Slope Repair 305,000 305,000 22006' Landscape Imp - Fallowfield 165,000 165,000 22206' Pkwy/Landscape Imp - Prospectors/Sunset Xing 131,150 131,150 20705' Lorbeer Ball Field 750,000 750,000 23607 School Area Curb Ramp Installation 201,258 201,258 23707 Site XR - Brea Canyon Rd/DB Blvd 0 0 23807 Lndscpe/Drainage Imp - Gold Rush East of DBB 150,000 150,000 TOTAL 1,702,408 751,150 201,258 0 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 FY 06-07 CIP Projects Grand Total $11,393,069 ' Carry -Over from FY05-06 Exhibit B CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST- Mid Year FY 06-07 Funding Source Totals General Fund 2,926,750 Gas Tax Fund 331,600 Prop A - Transit Fund 150,000 Prop C - Transit Fund 905,000 TEA -LU 768,000 STP -L 935,845 2004 Approp Act (Sect 117) 991,700 State HES Program 220,000 TDA -Bikeways & Trails 84,755 Traffic Congestion Relief Funds 693,000 Developer Fees 250,000 CDBG Fund 303,069 Prop 12 - Park Grant 165,000 Prop 40 - Park Grant 0 Rivers & Mountains Conservancy 140,000 Park Development Fund 1,708,330 Prop A - Safe Parks 795,000 Donations 25,000 LLAD 38 0 $11,393,069 CIP Project Type Totals Street Improvements Traffic Control Improvements Park and Rec. Improvements Miscellaneous Improvements 5,678,000 1,680,000 2,332,661 1,702,408 $11,393,069 Exhibit C CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Movies Under the Stars MID -YEAR BUDGET REQUEST -- Community Services FY 06-07 To provide movies in the park for families free of charge. The program would operate after the concerts at Sycamore Canyon Park. Budget is based on the purchase of movie projection equipment & screen. An alternative is to rent equipent. Program would cost $18,178 for one summer if equipment is rented rather than purchased. REVENUE PROJECTION: FEE PROGRAM TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET PROJECTED EXPENDITURES $ 28,178.10 PERSONNEL SERVICES Total Amount Budgeted: $ 1,778.10 Personnel (40030) Amount Budgeted: $ 1,595.44 (3) Recreation Leader II-- 7 weeks x 4 hours @ $10.66 $ 895.44 Recreation Coordinator 7 weeks x 4 hours x 26.00 hour $ 700.00 Personnel Services (40000) Amount Budgeted: $ 182.66 Worker's Compensation (40083) @ 3.8% $ 60.62 Medicare (40085) @ 1.45% $ 23.13 Social Security (40085) @ 6.2% $ 98.91 PRINTING (42110) Event Flyers/Posters RENTAL/LEASE OF EQUIPMENT (42130) Movie Rental $300 x 7 weeks CAPITAL OUTLAY Amount Budgeted: $ 300.00 Amount Budgeted: $ 2,100.00 $300.00 $2,100.00 Misc Equipment (46250) Amount Budgeted: $24,000.00 20'x 11' Movie Screen & Projector $24,000.00 Agenda No. 8.1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: February 6, 2007 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James DeStefano, City Mana Subject: Addendum to Mid -Year Budget Review — Capital Improvement Projects Prospector's Road —Sunset Crossing Improvements (CIP Project #21006): The engineer's estimate came in at $900,000 which is much higher than the original anticipated cost. This is due to the substandard pavement constructed prior to the City's incorporation. In order to bring the street up to the City's standards the cost is much higher. This project had been budgeted for $450,000. With this recent information it is recommended that the budget be increased to $877,150. Upon receiving & evaluating the bids, Public Works staff will bring back the appropriate recommendation if necessary. In an effort to work within the General Fund CIP transfer amount of $2,926,750 the following is recommended: • Landscape Improvements — Prospectors/SSXng, Navajo Spgs be combined with street improvement project - $131,150 • Landscape/Drainage Improvements — Gold Rush East of Diamond Bar Blvd — Postponed until FY07-08 - $120,000 Additional Gas Tax Funding — $176,000 The new project funding breakdown is recommended to be as follows: General Fund $251,150 Gas Tax 188,000 Traffic Congestion Relief Funds 438,000 $877,150 Interconnect Project (CIP Project #23207): The original Mid Year Budget amendment requested that $150,000 be added to the project. This was to be funded with Prop A — Transit Funds. The City has been told by the MTA that this is not an eligible expenditure of Prop A — Transit Funds. As a result it is recommended that this project be fully funded with Prop C — Transit Funds for a total of $650,000. Attached please find a revised CIP project list with the revised recommendations. Attachment: Exhibit B — Revised 02/05/07 — Capital Improvement Project List — Mid Year Exhibit B CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REVISED 02/05/07 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST- Mid Year FY 06-07 Miscellaneous Improvements 19403 DBC - Slope Repair 305,000 305,000 22006" Landscape Imp - Fallowfield 165,000 2005 Fed 22206` Pkwy/Lndscpe Imp - Prspctrs/SS Xing, Navajo Spg Tr Cngstn Rif / TDA - 20705' Lorbeer Ball Field 750,000 750,000 23607 School Area Curb Ramp Installation 201,258 201,258 Prop A - TEA -LU I STP. Approp Act State HES Developer Bikeways & Project # Project Description Total Cost Gen Fd Gas Tax Transit Prop C L (Sect 117) Program Fees Trails Street Improvement Projects 18604` Grand Ave BB- Phase II, Montefino to Rolling Knl 1,680,000 243,008 935,845 470,064 31,083 53,672 18605 Grand Ave BB- Phase III, Rling Knl to E. City Limit 1,650,000 306,692 768,000 521,636 255,000 01406` Slurry SeaVOverlay - Area 2 748,000 273,400 219,600 01407 Slurry Seal/Oveday - Area 3 750,000 750,000 438,000 21006 Prospectors Rd - Sunset to Gldn Spgs 877,150 251,150 188,000 22706 Washington St. Cul -De -Sac 100,000 100,000 23906 Arterial Slurry Seal - Zone 1 300,000 300,000 Total - Street Improvement Projects 6,105,150 2,124,250 507,600 0 0 1,703,845 991,700 0 693,000 84,755 Traffic Management /Safety Projects 250,000 14699' Brea Cyn Cutoff @ SB 57 On/Off Ramp 250,000 22307 Neighborhood Traffic Management Mitigations 125,000 125,000 23007 DB Blvd/Golden Sprgs Mod 120,000 120,000 22907 BCRIGolden Sprgs Mod 120,000 120,000 23107 Golden Sprgs @Racquet Club 165,000 165,000 23207 Interconnect Links 650,000 650,000 220,000 23307 TC - Prspctrs Rd (SS Xng & Gdn Spgs) & 250,000 30,000 Sunset Xing Rd (DB Blvd & Prospector) Total -Traf c Projects 1,680,000 155,000 0 0 1,055,000 0 0 220,000 250,000 0 Total Road/Traffic Imp - FY06-07 7,785,150 2,279,250 507,600 0 1,055,000 1,703,845 991,700 220,000 943,000 84,755 Rivers & Mtns Project # Project Description Total Cost General Fd CDBG Pro 12 Pro 40 Park Dev Fund Pro A - SP Cons. Donations Parks and Rec Improvements 50,000 691,880 795,000 15704' Sycamore Cyn Pk - ADA Retrofit Phase 111 1,536,880 115,000 116,800 25,000 21506' Pantera Park Storerooms, Restrooms & Drink Ftn 256,800 21606' Paul C. Grow ADA Retro -Construction 101,831 101,831 140,000 21706' Trail Access - DBC/Clear Crk @ Steep Cyn 140,000 23407 DBC - Emergency Generator 147,500 147,500 149,650 23507 Batting Cages - Peterson & Pantera Parks 149,650 TOTAL 2,332,661 147,500 101,831 165,000 0 958,330 795,000 140,000 25,000 Project # Protect Description Total Cost General Fd CDBG Prop 12 Prop 40 Park Dev Fund LLAD 38 LLAD 39 LLAD 41 Miscellaneous Improvements 19403 DBC - Slope Repair 305,000 305,000 22006" Landscape Imp - Fallowfield 165,000 165,000 22206` Pkwy/Lndscpe Imp - Prspctrs/SS Xing, Navajo Spg 0 20705' Lorbeer Ball Field 750,000 750,000 23607 School Area Curb Ramp Installation 201,258 201,258 23707 Site XR - Brea Canyon Rd/DB Blvd 0 0 23807 Lndscpe/Drainage Imp - Gold Rush East of DBB 30,000 30,000 TOTAL 1,451,258 500,000 201 FY 06-07 C/P Projects Grand Total $11,569,069 ' Carry -Over from FY05-06 750,000 REVISED 02/05/07 Exhibit CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST- Mid Year FY o6-07 CIP Project Type Totals Funding Source Totals 2,926,750 Street Improvements 6,105,150 General Fund 507,600 Traffic Control Improvements 1,680,000 Gas Tax Fund 0 Park and Rec. Improvements 2,332,661 Prop A - Transit Fund 1,055,000 Miscellaneous Improvements 1,451,258 Prop -Transit Fund TEA -LU $11,569,069 STP -L ,840 935 935,845 2004 Approp Act (Sed 117) 991,700 State HES Program 220,000 TDA -Bikeways & Trails 84,755 Traffic Congestion Relief Funds 693,000 Developer Fees 250,000 CDBG Fund 303,089 Prop 12 - Park Grant 165,000 Prop 40 - Park Grant 0 Rivers & Mountains Conservancy 140,000 Park Development Fund 1,708,330 Prop A - Safe Parks 795,000 Donations 25,000 LLAD 38 0 $11,569,069 Agenda # $ 2 Meeting Date: February 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mana er TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (NTMP) PILOT PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the presentation by staff, approve modifications to specific areas as identified, direct staff to continue engineering evaluation of Pilot Projects, and approve modifications to the NTMP Manual/Guidelines. FINANCIAL IMPACT: A total of $125,000 is allocated in the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Program Budget for NTMP projects. BACKGROUND: On September 20, 2005, the City Council held a study session to review the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) and subsequently on October 4, 2005, the City Council adopted the NTMP Manual/Guidelines and approved the NTMP Pilot Projects as presented. Upon completing the construction plans, at the June 20, 2006 regular meeting, City Council awarded a construction contract for the NTMP Pilot Projects to Imperial Paving, Co. Prior to the construction of the Pilot Project improvements, a notification letter (dated July 20, 2006) with a list of streets and improvements was mailed to over 400 affected residents. The plans that were put into action called for installation of several types of traffic claming measures, including speed cushions, Texas dots and traffic circles. Construction began the week of August 7, 2006 and was completed on October 16, 2006. During construction staff maintained a running log of all resident comments that were emailed, phoned or mailed in to City Hall (Attachment "A"). Once the project construction was complete, staff began the evaluation period at which time speed and volume data were collected in November of 2006 and January of 2007 and compared to the before data gathered prior to construction. Additionally, in December of 2006, two months after the completion of construction, opinion surveys (3,820) were sent out to the eight (8) surrounding neighborhoods of the designated Pilot Project areas. In total, twelve (12) residential roadways have Pilot Project measures installed on them. Moreover, as part of the evaluation process, all residents from the eight (8) affected neighborhoods were invited to participate in an Open House held on Saturday, January 20, 2007. A total of 104 residents participated in the Open House throughout the day. Three presentation times were scheduled to present the results of the opinion survey and the before and after volume and speed count data to those in attendance. Upon conclusion of the presentation, break out sessions for each neighborhood were conducted with the consultant and staff at which time residents were able to submit both written and verbal comments on the pilot project calming measures. DISCUSSION: The Open House presentations gave a historical perspective to all attendees on the City's NTMP and the Pilot Projects. This afforded an overview to attendees as to how the pilot projects in each area came to fruition. Before and after traffic speed and traffic volume data was presented on each of the affected streets. (Attachment "B") Two speed and volume surveys have been conducted since the pilot projects were installed. The first was conducted in November of 2006 and presented at the Open House. The second was conducted in January of 2007 and is being presented to Council and the public at this time. The "after" data shows there have been reductions in speeds on most roadway segments since the tools were implemented. Some roadway segments have seen a slight increase in speeds as well. Overall the desired effect that was communicated by participants in the NTMP workshops that were conducted in 2005, reduction in vehicular speeds, has been achieved. The volume data shows there have been some changes in traffic volumes on select roadway segments as well. Specifically, the Lycoming/Glenwick neighborhood. These anomalies can be attributed to the closure of Brea Canyon Road which is causing some motorists to use Lycoming as an alternate route. Staff is continuing to monitor this situation with the Sheriff's Department. At this time staff has concluded that the Pilot Projects have had the desired effect that was communicated by the public to staff before and during the NTMP process by reducing the speed of the Pilot Project neighborhoods. Since the installation of the Pilot Projects staff has received input from residents about the tools that were installed. In addition to the Citizen Input Log that was previously mentioned, staff conducted an opinion poll in December of last year at which time 3,820 surveys were mailed out to the affected households located around the pilot project areas and 388 (10%) were returned prior to the deadline of 12/29/06. A summary of the survey results is attached (Attachments "C", "C-1" and "C-2"). Community sentiment has been mixed with some neighborhoods in favor of the tools such as Golden Prados, Cliffbranch, Sunset Crossing, and Maple Hill neighborhoods, some evenly split such as the Lycoming, Fountain Springs, and Castle Rock neighborhoods and others clearly opposed such as the Rancheria/Jubilee neighborhood. Similarly, the comments (total of 72) received at the January 20th Open House were also mixed with some speaking in favor of what has been done to date while others want the tools removed (Attachment "D"). W Based on input received to date and staff's own observations and analysis of the Pilot Program tools, staff recommends some field modifications to the Pilot Projects. 1) Staff is recommending the removal of the two (2) traffic circles that were installed in the Rancheria Neighborhood on Rancheria Road. 2) Staff is recommending the removal of the Texas dots that were installed on Golden Prados Drive at Hopi Street. 3) Staff is recommending the removal of the Texas dots that were installed on Fountain Springs. 4) Staff is recommending the removal of some of the Texas dots that were installed on Maple Hill Road that prevent adequate ingress and egress of the Maple Hill Elementary and Maple Hill Park driveways. 5) Add additional advisory speed signage at various locations of the speed cushions. 6) Evaluate and consider the reduction of speed cushions along Sunset Crossing. 7) Staff will continue to work with the community to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the remaining pilot program tools that were installed. The Sheriff's Department will also be working with us to monitor the traffic operations in these areas to ensure motorist compliance with all traffic regulations. Additionally, based on staff's experience to date with the Pilot Program and the number of requests for new NTMP studies throughout the City, staff further recommends making some clarifications to the NTMP Manual/Guidelines adopted by Council on October 4, 2005. These changes will clarify how the NTMP process is initiated by residents as discussed in Section 1.4.1 of the Manual/Guidelines (Attachment E") which will include the following language changes. Bullet one will now read: The City receives a written request to mitigate a traffic concern by a petition of 51 % of the households on the affected street(s). Bullet three will now read: A meeting for the residents along the affected street(s) will be held to discuss their concerns and gather first-hand information. In conclusion, The NTMP represents the City's commitment to the safety and livability of each neighborhood along with a community-based approach to traffic management. The Pilot Projects serve as a demonstration to all Diamond Bar residents at what a neighborhood coming together as a community is capable of creating to address specific traffic concerns. These calming measures serve as visual examples to reference but more importantly, the ultimate solution requires altering motorist and resident's driving and travel behavior. NTMP provides a process for identifying, prioritizing, and addressing neighborhood traffic problems. This process requires careful planning, a willingness to change habits, and community consensus building. It is staff's recommendation to make the modifications to the existing NTMP Pilot Project areas and continue to monitor the program over the next five months at which time additional speed and volume data will be collected in July of 2007. Once a thorough engineering analysis is completed, staff will return to Council with a final report of the Pilot Projects. In the meantime, with Council concurrence, staff would like to continue implementation of the NTMP with other neighborhoods as approximately seven (7) additional written requests from neighborhoods (Castle Rock Road between Fountain Springs Road and Cold Springs Lane "Two written requests for this Castle Rock neighborhood, Briar Creek Road, Sylvan Glen Road, Palomino Drive, Birch Hill Drive, and Lycoming Street east of Brea Canyon Road) not participating the Pilot Project areas have come through City Hall. PREPARED BY: Joel Falter, Katz-Okitsu and Associates Kimberly Molina, Associate Engineer Date: February 1, 2007 David G. Liu, Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: David . L' irector of Public Works ATTACHMENTS: (A) Citizen Input Log (B) Before and After Traffic Volume & Speed Data (C) Opinion Survey (C-1) Opinion Survey Summary by Question (C-2) Opinion Survey Summary by Neighborhood (D) Open House Comments (E) Section 1.4.1 of the NTMP Manual/Guidelines (F) NTMP Pilot Project Location Map 4 Date I Address 1 8/22/06 L comi 2 8/22/06 Del Sol 3 8/22/06 L comin 4 8/24/06 Maple Hill 5 8/25/06 Not Given 61 8/27/06 l Castlerock 7 8 8/28/06 Not Given 8/28/06 Harmon Hill 9 8/29/06 Earl ate 10 11 8/29/06 Birch Hill 8/30/07 Palomino 12 8/30/06 Bridle 13 8/30/06 JCrooked Creek 14 8/30/06 1 Not Given 15L9/5/06 I Rock River 16L_9/5/06 I Fountain Spas 17L9/5/06 ISunset XING Attachment "A" NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM Location of NTM Input/Comments Does not like cushions. Cars/trucks traveling over them make too much noise. How does he get cushions on his street? Does not like cushions. Cars/trucks traveling over them make too much noise. Very leased with the s eed cushions Form ofP Inquiry Phone Lycoming Sunset Cross7ing Lycoming Phone Phone Maple Hill Phone Cold Springs Castle Rock Seed Cushions need to be more visible How does he get cushions on his portion of Castlerock? Phone Phone ???? Please mark speed cushions so they are more visible Does not like cushions. Diminishes value of property. Does not like cushions. Would likes eed cushions on Birch Hill Would likespeed cushions on Palomino Phone Fountain Springs Email Fountain S rin s In Person NIA N/A Golden Prados Letter Letter Does not like cushions. Phone Cold Springs Does not like cushions. They are too noisy when cars/trucks travel over them Does not like the visibility of cushions. Would like them to be much— more visible. Cannot understand why we put speed cushions on a 35 mph ...is this ri ht? Inquired as to why we are adding parking lane striping when parking is by permit only. I informed her that this is to narrow the roadway to alter driver behavior. Would like to have speed cushions higher. Informed him that we cannot make them too high for safety reason but we will inspect to make sure the meet the minimum height requirement. In Person Email Maple Hill L comin -roadway hone Fountain S rin s Phone Sunset Crossin Phone Page 1 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM EDate Address Location of NTMP Form of Input/Comments Inquiry Would like speed cushions on his portion of Castle Rock (BTWN 18Not Given Castle Rock Fountain Springs and Cold S rin s Email Would like his street added to the Pilot Project as an emergency measure because he believes his street is one of the worse streets in Diamond Bar and it needs 19 9/7/06 Platina Jubilee Seed Cushions now, not in six months Phone 201 9/7/06 lCrooked Creek lCold 21 � 9/8/06 lJubilee 22 9/11/06 ILycoming 23[79/12—/0-6— Not Given 24L2/14/06 Works in DB 25 9/18/06 Ballena 261 9/19/06 lJubilee 27L_9/20/06 I Not Given 28 9/20/06 JAlada Dr Rancheria Castle Rock Sunset Cross All Rancheria @ Jubilee Rancheria Rancheria @ Casa Loma 291 9/20/06 lCrooked Creek IFountain Following up on possible relocation of speed cushions because they are too noisy. Called on 9/8/06 to inform her that the traffic engineer is investigating ossible relocation and we will keep her posted. Phone Does not like the Traffic Circles. He believes that they are a waste of Tax payers money. He wants them out immediately (Though they have not been installed yet). In Person Would like speed cushions on Silver Fir. Loves speed cushions. Phone Thinks they are reat. Would like speed cushions on their portion of Castle Rock Email Speed Cushions need to be more visible. Also, she notices that drivers are trying to drive in-between the cushions to avoid them and Phone often are heading towards head on collisions. How does he get speed cushions on Ballena? Phone Inquired about Traffic Circle. Thinks she will like them to stem traffic flow and slowspeeding traffic. Phone Inquired if there will be more improvements to the traffic circles. Did not ex ress like or dislike. Phone Is Traffic Circle necessary? Informed of a six month evaluation and will have an opportunity to voice opinion during process. Phone Does not like that street has been narrowed. Thinks traffic will back up now and would like to have the blocked lane turned into a right turn only lane. Would like to petition to have all the speed cushions removed. In Person Page 2 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Date Address Location of NTMP Input/Comments Does not like the speed cushions because they are too noisy and they scare her dog and the children at the day care center. I informed her she will have the opportunity to participate in any follow up meetings but at this time they were placed due to complaints about drivers cutting the corner and at this time we are not considering moving them. Does not like the traffic circles, thinks the are dumb. Speed cushions need signs and more paint around them. Why are they broken up? I explained that signs and additional striping would be installed shortly. Additionally, I explained the emergency response vehicles that can travel through the breaks in the cushions. Thinks speed cushions are great and would like speed cushions on her street. Will send a letter in. a ee'cdraz shions are okay but the traffic circles Circles don't work. Waste of tax dollars. Trucks and motor homes have difficulty maneuvering the circles. Why are traffic circles installed? They are causing confusion and vehicles are traveling in wrong direction. Will crosswalks be installed? Form of Inquiry Phone 9/20/06 Crooked Creek Cold S rin s 9/20/06 9/20/06 9/21/06 9/21/06 Char min dale High Bluff Flintlock Meadcliff RancheriaPhone Fountain S rin s Sunset Crossin : I Rancheria and Jubilee Phone Phone Phone 9/21/06 Not Given Rancheria 9/22/06 Charmin dale Rancheria email Phone 9/23/06 Casa Loma Rancheria Does not like Traffic circles. Thinks they are dangerous. circlesksy an Inletter s flor the unit afll meetin scauseore re ardidne nts traffic does not recall Does not like traffic circles. They are a waste of tax dollars. They do not work and says that large trucks/trailers and motor homes cannot make turns Has a lar a trucks with trailer and cannot make left turns. Does not like the traffic circles. Is now causing traffic to travel on Charmin dale to avoid traffic circles on Rancheria. Email 9/25/06 9/25/06 Casa Loma Not Given Rancheria and Jubilee Rancheria Phone email 9/25/06 9/25/06 Crooked Arrow Casa Loma RancheriaPhone Rancheria Phone Page 3 E,W 4E 4� 50 Page 4 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 Input/Comments Does not like traffic circles. Believes the de -value the property and it was undemocratic to put them in without the public vote. PM Date .2 9/25/06 Address Rancheria Location of NTMP Rancheria Form of Inquiry Phone 3 9125/06 Charmin dale Rancheria Does not like traffic circles. She cannot navigate her truck around circles and does not like speed cushions. All traffic is using Charmingdale to avoid Rancheria. Would like to have traffic data from first couple of meetings. thensthe are dan a ous. o s. cars rus agains em Phone 4 9/26/06 Fountain S s Fountain Springs Phone Likes to speed cushions but does not like the Texas Dots. Believes they are dangerous and will cause vehicles to 5 9/27/06 Golden Prados Golden Prados overturn if they are driver over. Had tire damage because she was over Dots. u at� aim no fastdfo`r tire damage. Would n the roadway andrlliike ve the Dots re ooed like to put Does not like the Traffic Circles. Will make it very difficult to maneuver his boat around. oes Wl IlKe I exas Uots. Had to dnve over em to avoid a collision which caused damage to his tires. Would like to put a claim in t o the city. Phone Phone i 9/28/06 Alada Rancheria ' 10/2/06 Not Given Maple Hill Phone 1 10/2/06 Redpost Maple HillPhone Texas dots damaged his car. Does not like Texas Dots at intersection of Maple Hill and Eagle Fin because it makes it difficult to turn left from Eagle Fin when cars are parked along Maple Hill. 10/2106 Eagle Fin Maple Hill Phone 10/4/06 lHarmony Hill Fountain S rin s Previously complained at Council Meeting and has spoken to Council Member Tye. Would like to get all notices for all subsequent meetings regarding NTMP and please have meeting times on the website. Also, please provide the map presented at the CC meeting ig the areas of the measures installed. Phone Page 4 57110/23 06 1 Kiowa Crest 58 Ll0/30/06 1 Eagle Fin 59 [ 10/30/06 1 Not Given NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM Location of NTMP Form of Input/Comments Inquiry Does not think that the bumps are effective and sees them as even more dangerous. Would like additional enforcement from Sheriffs Sunset Crossing I no..+ Date Address 51 10/9/06 Sunset XING 52 10/13/06 L comin 53 10/16/06 Cholame 54 10/17/06 Cliffbranch 55 10/18/06 Charmin dale 56 10/13/06 Sylvan Glen 57110/23 06 1 Kiowa Crest 58 Ll0/30/06 1 Eagle Fin 59 [ 10/30/06 1 Not Given NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM Location of NTMP Form of Input/Comments Inquiry Does not think that the bumps are effective and sees them as even more dangerous. Would like additional enforcement from Sheriffs Sunset Crossing I no..+ Thinks Kiowa Crest should have received bumps before the other areas in the pilot project program. Does not want to go out for a 67% vote. Prefers to do Kiowa Crest as a "Pilot" project so 67% vote is not needed. Requested that we just put the bumps in without the 67% majority vote because it is dangerous. Informed him that Maple Hill he must submit his request in writing. Phone Texas Dots along maple Hill are a "Traffic Safety and Public Safety" issue. He believes that in the rain and at night, these dots will be difficult to see, causing potential hazards for cars that are speeding down the road, they may hit the Dots, lose control and hit a Eagle Fin & Ma le Hill pedestrian on the sidewalk or within someone's front ard. Phone Would like a stop sign in this area immediately. This is a huge Iron Bark & Pecan Grove safet issue that an one can see if they take a look. Phone Page 5 Phone Would likespeed cushions or a stop si n on Lycominq at Lincoln. Request Partner L comin Came in to City Hall to receive more info on the speed cushions. Says that speeds are better but is not sure if he likes them or not. Sunset Crossing"Ju is still out,, Came to council to discuss speed cushions and NTMP. Said he In Person likes the speed cushions but feels they are not enough. He would Cliffbranch like to see Texas Dots along center of roadway. Said he will do what In Person ever he can to help promote NTMP. Council M Rancheria Hates traffic circles. Would like all notices sent to ****** (Address Phone removed for confidentiality reasons Would likes peed cushions on Sylvan Glen Email Thinks Kiowa Crest should have received bumps before the other areas in the pilot project program. Does not want to go out for a 67% vote. Prefers to do Kiowa Crest as a "Pilot" project so 67% vote is not needed. Requested that we just put the bumps in without the 67% majority vote because it is dangerous. Informed him that Maple Hill he must submit his request in writing. Phone Texas Dots along maple Hill are a "Traffic Safety and Public Safety" issue. He believes that in the rain and at night, these dots will be difficult to see, causing potential hazards for cars that are speeding down the road, they may hit the Dots, lose control and hit a Eagle Fin & Ma le Hill pedestrian on the sidewalk or within someone's front ard. Phone Would like a stop sign in this area immediately. This is a huge Iron Bark & Pecan Grove safet issue that an one can see if they take a look. Phone Page 5 6; 64 65 66 67 68 Page 6 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM Date Address Location of NTMP Input/Comments Would like to have future meetings sooner than 6 months. Also would like to know what studies were conducted to determine traffic circle size. She believes the intersection is dangerous. He believes people drive faster now that the circles are there, and they do not properly yield. He believes stop signs would have been better. Form of Inquiry Phone Phone ;0 10/26/06 Char min dale 1 10/31!06 Via Rancho Rancheria & Jubilee Rancheria 11/2/06 i 11/3/06 Charmin dale Calbourne Rancheria & Jubilee L corrin Would like to know what she can bring up the NTMP concerns of her neighborhood to a public forum. Would CC meeting or T&T meeting be appropriate? I called her back on 11/3/06 to inform her that while it will not be an open forum discussion at the CC or T&T meetings, she definitely had the right to bring it up at those meetings. The open forum discussion would be held at the follow up meetings scheduled for January/February and explained that those dates were Surveyshorterwould bethan the outshord'I month period. I also informed her that a Would like measures on Calbourne. Attended the neighborhood meetings in the past and nothing came of them, Would like to see some results and is interested in attending the follow up meeting to the L corrin ilot project. Would like to be notified of any future meetings regarding improvements Unacceptable way to calm traffic, de -values property. Frustrating to travel around them every day and they should be removed and put a stop sign in. Phone Phone Phone Phone Messa e 11/3/06 Jubilee Lane Jubilee and Rancheria 11/4/06 11/4/06Meadcliff 11/4/06 Not Given Meadcliff Rancheria Rancheria Rancheria -.they Real! inconvenient and ruins cars sus ension. Dissatisfied with bumps on Rancheria and prefers stop signs and are an eyesore. Traffic Circles are ugly and she does not like them, Prefers a two- way stop. Phone Phone Message Phone Message 11/4/06 Meadcliff Rancheria Page 6 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM 69 70 Date 11/6/06 11/6/06 Address Jubilee Not Given Location of NTMPForm Rancheria Rancheria Input/Comments Retired police officer who believes the traffic circles are too large and too small. Never seen accidents before and doesn't think they are necessary. Believes stop signs would have been better and wants the traffic circles removed. of Inquiry Phone Phone Messa e 71 11/6/06 Meadcliff RancheriaPhone Traffic circles "totall don't work" Messa e 72 73 74 75 11/6/06 11/6/06 11/7/06 11/7/06 Jubilee Lane Via Rancho Nava'o S rin s Meadcliff Rancheria Rancheria Sunset Crossin Rancheria Traffic Circles ands peed cushions Traffic Circles are problem. No one stops. Would like to be informed of all future meetin s Dislike traffic circles. Phone Message Phone Phone Phone 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 11/8/06 11/8/06 11/9/06 11/9/06 11/13/06 11/8/06 11/9/06 Castlerock Las inoSpeed Rancheria Jubilee Lane Meadcliff Castle Rock Wagon Trail Castle Rock Sunset Cross 1'111111111 Rancheria Rancheria Rancheria Castle Rock Golden Prados Texas Dots -doesn't think bicycles were taken into consideration (also motorcycles). Too dangerous. City putting obstacles in road is potential lawsuit. Also expressed no Droblem with speed cushions. Cushions -Feels it lowers property value. He is anxiously awaiting meetin to discuss. "Yield" is not understood by all traveling around the circle. Looks like a commercial parking lot. "Brainless" View is terrible with all yellow bumps and signs. Circle looks like a space craft landing. Just heartbreaking. Traffic circles are not serving their purpose and she believes a four - way stop would be better, Do not like Texas Dots. Does not think that Texas Dots work alon Golden Prados/ Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Email Email 83 11/16/06 Rancheria Road. Rancheria like Delivery trucks having hard time traveling around circles. Does not them and does not want to look at them for the rest of his life. Phone Page 7 Page 8 NTMP Pilot Project Citizen Input Log Updated2/1/20075:41 PM 84 35 36 17 Date Address Location of NTMPForm Input/Comments Traffic expert for the CHP who believes that this program is a waste of tax payers money. He hopes this was funded through a grant. He believes stop signs would have been better at slowing traffic down. He is opposed to the traffic circles. Traffic circles don't help. Drivers will speed down the hill and she feels this will ultimately cause accidents the the City will be liable for. Asked about traffic meetings and wants to be notified. Believes that the cushions were unnecessary experiment on the street. Asked specific questions about criteria for choosing roadways for Pilot Project, speed cushion location, size of circle, cost of construction. Back injury makes it difficult to drive over cushions. of Inquiry Phone Phone email 11/20/06 11/20/06 12/18/06 Meadcliff Casa Loma Jubilee Rancheria Rancheria Jubilee 1/3/07 L comin L comin Wanted to thank the City for installing speed cushions because it makes it much easier to exit and enter the mobile home park. Does not want them removed. email 8 9 1/9/07 lLycoming 1/22/07 I Briar Creek LLycoming Sunset Crossingemail Would like to thank the City for installing speed cushions because it makes it much safer and easier to exit mobile home park. Also believes it is safer for children walking to school because cars are slowing down -crosswalk duty for Walnut Elementary. Would additional enforcement on 18 wheelers down L comin . Would likes speed cushions on Briar Creek lemail Page 8 a rt rt n p rt ed m OT m n % p O 3 H o 3 o g£ ; m y m y o m omi y O m o n S N A :E m m d m N o m H° H a OT m T m 0 m O n N O N ° b n o N b Z N c £ C N N N m o' - n] � x r a^ ,• _ m -= m= o o a m m ] - o m m ] m i o� -, ^ m ] o� - .. ] o? o m _• � d b � n o m � y m � m m - m z: m xr G a nm Doi i�l> ; A� Q V � 9 � n> > ? O � y � A � A o O. ,. O ,•. • • m m O n n O m n � o � a � n 0 0 an d c c° Z m b N A a 33 O J an d N Z J o 00 oS $S go'g ff $S S 5 �q m g So gEgo T-o�� D D D tf N w p m O] < m p T w w 0 N wv mm m uN m mom a,_ oo ^+ �bm4D� mw < & a' m�^ mOa m P� mm .i m w mw +� 2 v m D o PNm a � m 0 d G m '0 4 w ON m ]° � � �^ • — o t s s' a o 0 �N Vs s Y d W d ip A ON V X�• N� u U �� b d m w N.Nj P p N V X• NO NOo N L N a y y y Jm N 4• 6 y d u NO � m 6 w+ N O y y {�w Ni0 N� N+ Nr m N mH0 X• n ] E d � 3 b'b v m vO� y!O NO nm a o w• m �n v a _. W N X�' J Nm l Nw Pue m m •n u, <nw Y' Nm -N.�„N� NN P P U _- d � � Y � tN1�N NA w-� D Xs wN W N X.,tD. G C m n wo nN N N• o o m o v � N u y 0 v b b d 'P o' o 0 's a Y d u -`� _, -•o m �a 'n bfn bN mm v i Y a b ' m3� mm - � -- n u by YY v•-• o o e dd vd div vw a.Ni w a om't•3 P u a �'' N P 15 NXD NP o NS w p� A X XD 1 C a N uw mm m o � U NS • tnw ? A Pm m U NN +P � o m w NA �� P P mN f.r OtNp pm X �]ai o C C v s a rt rt n p rt ed Attachment "C" NTMP SURVEY COUNTS Neighborhood Total Number of Surveys Sent Total Number of Surveys Received Surveys without Comments or Address Total Percentage Surveys Received After Deadline* Total Percentage Surveys Received @ Open House** CASTLE ROCK- COLD SPRINGS 215 30 0 14% 1 14% 0 CLIFFBRANCH- BELLA PINE 553 34 0 6% 4 7% 0 FOUNTAIN SPRINGS 502 58 0 12% 6 13% 0 GOLDEN PRADOS 157 17 1 11.5% 1 12% 1 LYCOMING-GLENWICK 355 27 3 8% 0 8% 4 MAPLE HILL 872 63 0 7% 2 7% 0 RANCHERIA-JUBILEE 259 64 2 25% 2 26% 1 SUNSET CROSSING 907 95 0 10% 5 11% 1 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE 12% 12% TOTAL 3820 388 6 21 7 * Deadline date of December 29, 2006 ** Open House held January 20, 2007 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (CASTLE ROCK) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN Castle Rock's X X X None. X X X The speed t Evergreen El don't like the X X X The stop sil traffic. X X X Need directio X X X Too many stc street and are, X X X Have you cc neighborhoc numerous sr the stop sign running the installed are X X X None. X X X Stop signs in! people who d( stop signs. X X X None. X X X We need the between Colc strip) X X X Please remove punish us, the X X X Full strip anc trucks. X X X Doesn't make bumps. X X X The speed bu X X X The tool does Both my cars ; they pass at remove all the NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (CASTLE ROCK) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMErs Castle Rock* X X None. X X X Thankyou! X X X None. X X X The balls i bic cies an( X X X Two smalle X X X None. X X X Please insta S rin s and X X X The road bun am/accident. X X X The bumps k It's wondcrfu stay in it's lai Thank you D X X X None. Chocktaw X X X We are on a Cold Springs * X X Some are slo) flying over th drastic would Why are there the other side X X X Why were tI Cool Springs X X X I feel there a large yellow Since install; Springs, incr down Cool S X X Too many sr amount of sr TOTAL 17 1 13 14 14 15 14 * Castle Rock (Device on Street iT TOTAL 14 11 I 12 13 12 12 * Cold Springs (Device on Street) L TOTAL 1 I � � 11 � 1 1 3 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (CLIFFBRANCH/BELLA PINE) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEI` Autumnglow X X X Please! N< street. X X I like the tr, Autumnglo, some other X X X None. Bella Pine* X X X We had no remove the X X X Thank you. X X X —Iwould wel Pine betwee X X X None. Broken Arrow X X X Thank you f everyone thi ahead. We Broken Arrc school buse<. Chestnut X X X Loosing air sign. Chestnut Creek X X X None. Cliffbranch * X X X Waste of me slow down t X X X Keep the de, drivers! X X X Speed bump vehicles still X X X None. X X X Put road mai from driving X X X I notice peol assume the n to read. The together. X X X Just right. X X X Thank you ft NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (CLIFFBRANCWBELLA PINE) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN Espada X X X The 4 -way run so often Evergreen Springs X X X None. Fern Hollow X X None. X X X None. X X None. X X X I would lik man fast cE X X X None. Leaning Pine X X X We need a s cars cut thro X X X I wish those Pine too! X X X Put more loi s eed limit. Los Cerros X X X Vehicles go a speedway. X X X Slow cars or X X X I would like How about traffic? Pine Hill X X Hitting your limit will dai Roundtree X X X Thankyou! Tambo X X X People who 4 won't matter have their ca these stupid 1None. Viento Verano X X X X X X The intersect Arrow needs Wellspring X X X The speed bL annoying. NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (CLIFFBRANCIUBELLA PINE) TOTAL 24 12 23 1 11 27 10 *C1i branch/Bella Pine (Devices on Street) TOTAL 9 3 10 2 9 3 6 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. White Star A complete flyer that ex blacktop hui bump or go Make it stra. must make i with your si. TOTAL 24 12 23 1 11 27 10 *C1i branch/Bella Pine (Devices on Street) TOTAL 9 3 10 2 9 3 6 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (FOUNTAIN SPRINGS) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN Birch Hill X X X Install them X FX X I would lik effectively, X X X Our street s and uphill. bumps. X X X We need so, too fast dow Costilla X X X Police are s near schools X X X The devices overkill" an( If the intent, worked. We ossible. Crooked Creek X X X The bumps s instead of br X X X You are ru probably coi spend our m, police at Pat] tickets to do turns, blockh X X X The white r road are awf bumps!! Was X X X Between Dia stop sign), i calming tools cause accider X X X Change the T only on Foun NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (FOUNTAIN SPRINGS) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN Crooked Creek X X X Speed buml why not c) Texas buml street. Par School drive The bumps 4 Texas Dots 1 X X X None. X X X Illegible. X X X The speed bedroom wi each large tr X X X Please instal Thank you. X X X None. X X I assume the speed bumps X X X I like the "bu them on the A+1! Fountain Springs* X X X Motorists are considerably X X X Most vehicle with no resul X X X None. X Texas Dots a parked across Why are ther Not good; a t shopping cen X X X They do not anyway. Do here races by NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (FOUNTAIN SPRINGS) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN' Fountain Springs* X X X Still have nu stop sign in traffic on str "cushions". Harmony Hill X X X None. X X X Devices sere vale Hidden Pines X X X property Speed bump people still s another tool X X X Fountain Spi bumps along be enough. S X X X X Residents co: having devic X Hideout X X None. X X X They are nee Fountain Spr X Hipass X X Please do not X X "Annoying ai neighborhoo< X X X This only effi through. Lost River I am not affec Therefore, I s X X X None. X X X More near B Rising Star X X X None. X X X Please remov, mv car! X X X The speed coi We need mor, Diamond Bar X X X Cars slow do` "dots", makin NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS FOUNTAIN SPRINGS ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO c ool =was d. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN' Rising Star X X X None. X X X None. Silver Cloud X X X The speed `9 ours eed v X X X This is great lighten up 1 That's a Sunbright X X X prol Those big N u ly, ugly! X What calmin cul-de-sac fr X X X School traffi lifting the obstructing X X X None. X X X The traffic i didn't have I more robler X X X They are a ht with all these control. Thes alignments ai were am led X X We need spec School. It's out, especiall X X Don't think n stop signs @ between. See X X X Too many peg Run stop sign X X X People are n Fountain Spr The people I Schoolspeed narrow street long as it do with my mote 10 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (FOUNTAIN SPRINGS) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN Sunbright X I like bum Large ones Your big d, Springs and — tires "slide X X X Not effectiv( X X X I find it 11 Neighborho< are sans the X X X None. Trigger X X X We were ne appreciate y for normal leave only remain 24/7. X X X Of no good L X X X It will be b, Canyon too. have tool ins *Fountain Springs (Device on I TOTAL 1 32 1 26 1 1 31 1 3 1 1 29 30 TOTAL 1 3 1 2 1 4 2 11 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (GOLDEN PRADOS) ADDRESS The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective. YES NO I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed. YES NO Do you want the program continued on your street? YES NO COMMEN' Bridle X X X None. X X X Neighborhooc extraneous in scenery. The nei hborhood: X X X It would be out on the m, X X X Overdoing tl the road Golden Prados * X X X and The Texas bui existed befor narrowed the s now. X X X I don't see th X X X Stop sign a sometimes i X X X These tools ai focus more of nearly cause i X X X How much fo the non -En li X X X None. X X X Up to a point hill up to and X X X Has helped, bi one right in f noted racing N the other night of his car. X X X Please remove m street ASY X X X You guys don X X X The small little street should ne Great Bend X X X parked car. The speed bum] my home on up their continuatic lower Great Bei 12 The devices implemented on my ADDRESS street (or nearby) are effective. Hoss Mount TOTAL *Golden Prados (Device on Street) TOTAL NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (GOLDEN PRADOS) YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN traffic calming tool program continued on that was installed. your street? X X X 13 We do not 1i Would like speeders do, parked near No respons The yellow 1 of T.J. Mexi X None. 8 4 1 X X X X X 10 10 9 9 11 5 7 4 6 7 13 We do not 1i Would like speeders do, parked near No respons The yellow 1 of T.J. Mexi X None. 8 4 1 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (LYCOMING/GLENWICK) 14 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEP ADDRESS implemented on my street (or nearby) are traffic calming tool that was installed. program continued on your street? effective. Adams rove X X X None. Cambon X X X Can you it Elementa X X Need 5-w Extremely residential Darius X X X I will obey bumps that Earl ate X X X None. Glenwick* X X X Thank you. X X X None. X X X Remove the L comin Lycoming* X X X Too much t X X X These spee has created X X X Majority of disregard si X X I live in the way stop at even get ou X X X Speed bum would be bi X X We need to X X X None. X X X The speed 1 to get in & X X X The tools v Even with 1 street. The to be expel X Traffic is tc X X X Speed bum to adjacent No respons No respons No res ons 14 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (LYCOMING/GLENWICK) TOTAL 1 14 1 13 T 1 14 1 15 1 1 15 1 13 *Glen wick/L comin (Devices on Street TOTAL 6 5 7 5 7 4 15 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMUN implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Moonlake X X X None. X X X I now muse Lycoming , of the trE Lycoming. the cars Glenwick. No respons, X X X None. Northampton X X X None. Penarth X X X Bad for our X X X Bad choice street! X X X The traffic police to en Pinefalls X X X Bad for our traffic to an X X X Bad choice X X X I would lik( stop signs a raised corn( X X The humps street but & TOTAL 1 14 1 13 T 1 14 1 15 1 1 15 1 13 *Glen wick/L comin (Devices on Street TOTAL 6 5 7 5 7 4 15 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (MAPLE HILL) 16 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Acacia Hill X X X None. Very diffici Bar Blvd. X X X None. Ano Nuevo X X X We would L plus the stre stop signs a: X X X None. X X X A big waste Arbury X X X Remove bm Aspen Grove X X X None. Baft X X X Too many b Birds Eye X X X None. X X None. X X None. X X None. X X X The faster Slower thrc car. Birds weekdays. many $$$. No res ons( X X X Please put speed of tra X X X None. Cedardale X X X I think Kiov tool. X X X What's wro Cello X X X Seems to be children du( Deeplawn X X X Speed buml always sloe; Hill School! Cliffbranch no school — si s. 16 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (MAPLE HILL) 17 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Dee lawn X X X None. Deerfoot X X X None. X X X I have speer weren't as h better. X X X Should put i X X X The device, car. Don't know We needs 4 X Teenagers a mph most o No good. X X X None. Eagleglen X X X Although th the pavemei should be ea Eddridge X X X I/We feel th way too larl turning. Us OK. Falconburn X X X Speed buml speeding up bumps are r. Maple Hill. Fox Glen X X X A speed bur down driver I have lived have not see never? Ironbark X X I'm living n morning ani very hard tc don't stopv 17 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (MAPLE HILL) 18 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Kiowa Crest X X Not aware o bumps on S, is Diamond X Speed Buml Department fire. The pr+ it and you w X X X I need to use like all the s $70,000 and for sensitive X X X We need it c too fast. X X X Not on my s speeding cai Some can gc X X Cars speed c wildlife and Lark Spring X X X None. X X X Can another Diamond Ba Maple Hill* X X X The device i Slowing doN louder noise Hill and Ble X X X Good work i X X X None. X X X None. X X X None. X The northbo Target need! Grand & Gc X X X Add more bi Blvd. on Ma Mensha X X X The speed b located just 18 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (MAPLE HILL) TOTAL 34 1 19 29 23 38 20 *Maple Hill (Device on Street) TOTAL 5 2 4 2 6 0 19 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Mt. Laurel X Would like t installed on i Glen. x X X Thank you! X X None. X X X None. X X X None. Pecan Grove X X X Pecan Grove and crosswa X X X Not sure the bumps arour Red Fir X X X None. Redpost X X X Damage to v sign most ef: X X None. Robin Oaks X X None. Shady Elm X X X Nearest yell( improperly 1 lot and easil, White Fir X X X Speed cushi( Speeds not a TOTAL 34 1 19 29 23 38 20 *Maple Hill (Device on Street) TOTAL 5 2 4 2 6 0 19 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) 20 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Alada X X X Circles are N enough). I'i turn. It do between the had no accid Cameron Crest X X X The circle Springs and think it is be X X X This, in my Very disap 4 X X X None. X X X The two "tr money. The, the local resi X X X Stop spendii unnecessary'. Casa Loma X X X The traffic c. Loma has nc traffic. A sti Springs and be more effe X X X Downhill tra yielding to c X X X People used prior to the I Charmingdale X X X The traffic c motorists go It has made i knows who 1 X X X Rancheria d( Entering off downhill tra: with a telepl You only crf go-aroundsi & Casa Lorr 20 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) 21 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEND implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Charmingdale X X X None. X X X The round -al residential st the concept chaos. Spee great. Also ; those merg Rancheria. -. X X Stop signs, c cautions sho X X X I really feel I working. X X X None. X X X Trip and fall It is a waste X X X The round -al on a resident X X X Add additior east of Diam stop sign. X X X Anything be cars on Arm x X X We love the driving. Crooked Arrow X X X Round-abou sign? X X X I like the spc all! Jubliee* X X X A different t big circle. S X X X None. X X X X X We don't lik speed bump! 21 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) W The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Jubilee* X X X No need for streets; circ negotiate. In slow driving traffic circle error, i.e. wi especially cis X X X Very good jc X X X This turn -arc a City emp] when both v had the righ was going at each other ; down or stof X X X Add a "stop' X X X Kids play in seen man ni X X X I look direct view I have What's wron X X X Remove unsi streets to ori] X X X These arc thf used in a nei accidents. X X X I think the s] abouts confi cars meet or way stop sig Speed bump downhill is v Maple Springs X X X 1/3 of driver; too far into t] left and cut y bump. The si awake. Pcol W NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) 23 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMENT implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Maple Springs X X X The only cor look so ugly! Meadeliff X X X The traffic di distraction. ' of our home. X X X Please put yi streets that n X X X Degrades the Jubilee and ( the right of v X X X Kids play in hesitation on Drivers' ban, do not see R; Visitors to of (bumps). X X X These yellov They can e, back our old X X Does not rea the problem X X X Traffic circ: know what heard many Stop signs at x X X Since the to had more nc years I've li confusing. I signs? X X X Put in stop si X X X Please put circular "roi work. Pleas X X X The turns arf arthritis. 23 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) 24 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMENI implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Rancheria* X X X Cars coming rarely heed the Our church ha; Bumps wouh drive across t side of the yi, X X X Would rather "traffic circle X X Dots with circl between them X X X This device confusing fo simple solutil X X X The traffic circ drivers just dri not yield to tl circle. I think X X X This was a mess as soo been cheaper X X X None. X X X You placed 2, was no justific to living reside X X X Oversized cit replaced by " X X X 150% a h neighborhood. seen several cl dogs and havf cutting short circle. It is 1 around several down. You c This problem device in a horrible. 4-wa neighborhood. device. 24 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (RANCHERIA/JUBLIEE) TOTAL 1 12 1 54 1 1 12 1 53 1 1 21 1 43 * Rancheria/Jubilee (Devices on Street) TOTAL 2 20 3 20 7 15 25 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Torito No response No response X X X Traffic circle one is no exc X X X Traffic going arc dan erous X X None. X X X Perhaps dire homes first a Via Rancho X X X Traffic circle stop signs. X X X It is confusin wrong way;i immediately. X X Yield circles to go left almc not a busy sti who must dri` inpossible to Springs in the is needed on it. X X X I Speed bum TOTAL 1 12 1 54 1 1 12 1 53 1 1 21 1 43 * Rancheria/Jubilee (Devices on Street) TOTAL 2 20 3 20 7 15 25 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Acolito X X The street I and especial Bower Cascade X X X I would like was a stop s still "fly" do X X X Sometimes c X X X It is wrong Program wit X X X Stop signs c, completely. most do any Briar Creek X X X Please put a Creek and D X X X Please do no go out of my Cholame X X X Speed Buml taxpayers' rr X X X Drivers ares a dangerous Decorah X X X We already 1 bigger/wider X X X Anything to X X X None. X X X None. X X X Speed cushi cushion at si drive right tl X X X They pose a Cars lose coi X X X Problem wi them drivin Sunset Cros: X X X Too much n4 X X X Goodjob! P X X X Change the t on Decorah. X X X Parking per curve in the 26 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) 27 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Decorah X X X Let's contim leasant plac X X X Need more o hill. X X X Thank you. X X X The bumper Crossing are through this bumpers. Is N. Del Sol X X X They do slov jarring. The, are much too on Navajo Sl X X X I do not like many and pe, "tools" will c X X X Speed has be X X X I try not to tr, whenever po aggravating X X X I was never a traffic progra X X X None. X X X It's annoying X X X X The speed bu especially at X X X The NTMP v Sunset Cross. I'd rather dri, X X X People stradd either. People Terrible nuiss now. Please r X X X Bumps are "r Crossine is w 27 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) 28 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEND implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Del Sol X X X Don't have N. El Encino X X X We live on a s eeds of 45. X X X None. X X X Change the s permit traffic limit, vs. 15 1 X X X More hazard landscaped. every 100', Minnequa X The parking of is reall bad. ' X X X The speed bu high. One is They need to Navajo Springs X X X Speed bumps together. Th Diamond Bat light turns rei green northb( bridge Gonne crucial to allt X X X I feel they are Springs are re if you would X X X X X Speed humps us still too fa; X X X It has made o speeders. Su: X X X I feel it is a wa reaction. Ther to this. N. Platina X X X Because they lots of people wherever. Tl Platina Dr. N 28 29 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. N. Platina X X X We still hav( X X X Are 9 speed Crossing an( X X X The speed bi the back and slowly (sem( Rancheria ro Even Clarerr Indian Hill. X X X Forget bump rush hour an X X X I grew up lea obeying spec necessary. F is in a hurry: president get them "Bush l Sapphire Cyn. X X X Slows traffic dangerous. X X X None. Sunset Crossing * X X X These new st there 4 bum X X X Sunset Cross traffic contro unbelieveabl X X X The speed of out of necess X X X Fill in center, street of yelp X X X None. X X X None. X X X None. X X X The bumps sl cross over the X X X It would be e continuous bi X X X None. 29 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Sunset Crossing* X X X The double, parking line: more danger lines to avoi4 oncoming tr. driveways! X X X People drive avoid the bui X X X Good job! X X X Doesn't Blom double line a X X X Long overdu speeding. PI X X X Our street w; is much safes X X X Many vehicl, to avoid the 1 discourage tl X X X Some policir or spanning c avoiding dev difference in X X X People pass c still have a lc X X X Need better t higher. Larg small cars go how fast you still go betwe slow live on middle betwe for 40 years. X X X Great job! X X X None. X X X We still have through the c X X X None. 30 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMEN' implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Sunset Crossing* X X X Has created: Dangerous o White stripe,, X X X Speed bump; between bun complete bui X X X Drivers are e down the mil bumps at hig X X X The street bu create a hass; X X X None. X X X Center divide bumps and X X X It has not dor most drivers. vehicles. X X Installation a will be remo, X X X Devices Cres down middle vehicle to Annoying. X What was pei (speed bump; X X X None. X X X None. Twin Pines X X X The people a, middle and cs Willapa X X X None. X X X None. Willow Creek X X X The frequenc like speed bu Springs bette X X X Replace snee 31 NTMP PILOT PROJECT SURVEYS (SUNSET CROSSING) TOTAL 1 68 1 34 1 1 49 1 49 1 1 62 1 38 * Sunset Crossing — Device on Street TOTAL 20 1 15 22 1 12 27 9 32 The devices YES NO I like the specific YES NO Do you want the YES NO COMMENI implemented on my traffic calming tool program continued on ADDRESS street (or nearby) are that was installed. your street? effective. Willow Creek X X X Willow Creel children at D right side oft X X X None. X X X Problems on parking from Peterson Parr and Briar Crc X X X We need mor on more City X X X None. TOTAL 1 68 1 34 1 1 49 1 49 1 1 62 1 38 * Sunset Crossing — Device on Street TOTAL 20 1 15 22 1 12 27 9 32 1^ City of diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program AREA. I Your Comments i'- 1 -`' City of Diamond Bar "' Neighborhood Traffic Management Program E CIty of Diamond Bar Wr Neighborhood Traffic Management Program A Rl !—: A 3 IMF 'S1 �' W Area 3 Measures RANCHEPJA (a Casa Loma @Jubilee Traffic Circle Area 3 Measures GOLDEN PRADOS Speed Cushions Median Striping Extension Striping with Texas Dots Your Comments r City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Your Comments City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Attachment "C-1" City of Diamond Bar NTMP Neighborhood Survey Summary by Question Yes A The devices implemented on my street (or nearby> are eft` dive: No NO Res onses Yes No No Responses Golden Pardus Neighborhood 9 6 Cliff Branch Neighborhood 21 ] 56% 38% 6 Lycoming/Glenwick Neighborhood 9 4 62% 26% 12% 11 Fountain Springs Neighborhood 30 14 2 41% 52% 7% Castle Rock Neighborhood 22 7 51% 37% 12% 16 Sunset Crossing Neighborhood 12 1 55% 41% 3% 62 Maple Hill Neighborhood 30 3 65% 32% 3% 28 Rancheria Neighborhood 18 17 44% 29% 27% 11 Jubilee Neighborhood 51 1 17% 81% 2% 0 Subtotal I 0 0% 100% 0% 188 B. 1 like the specific traffic calming toot thatwas tnstailed. 163 36 49% 42% 9 Golden Pardos Neighborhood 8 7 1 50% 44%— 6% Cliff Branch Neighborhood 20 Lycoming/GlenwickNeighborhood 10 13 1 59% 38% 3% Fountain Springs Neighborhood 29 15 2 37% 56% 7% Castle Rock Neighborhood 27 3 49% 46% 5% 13 Sunset Crossing Neighborhood 15 1 45% 52% 3% 49 Maple Hill Neighborhood 43 3 52% 45% 3% 26 Rancherta Neighborhood 23 14 41% 37% 22% 11 Jubilee Neighborhood 51 1 17% 81/0 2 0 Subtotal 1 0 0% 100% 0% 166 Bl. Ifyes, would you like to see this tool permanently installed?(Percerttagcs based on'lotai respoo-,to 1 195 Question 26 B) 43% 50% 7% 0 Golden Pardus Neighborhood 8 Cliff Branch Neighborhood 18 1 8 50% 0% 50% Lycoming/GlenwickNeighborhood to 15 53% 3% 44% Fountain Springs Neighborhood 23 0 17 37% 0% 63% Castle Rock Neighborhood 12 3 33 39% 5% 56% Sunset Crossing Neighborhood 0 17 41% 0% 59% 44 Maple Hill Neighborhood 2 49 46% 2% 52% 25 Rancheria Neighborhood 0 38 40% 0% 60% 9 Jubilee Neighborhood 0 54 14% 0% 86% 0 Subtotal 0 1 I 0% 0% 1 100% 149 B2. If no, would you tike to sees different stool installed? -s" baled flu total raspohses'to , uesiion 6 «1 232 39% 2% 60% 7 Golden PardosNeighborhood 0 Cliff Branch Neighborhood 6 9 0% 44% 56% Lycoming/Glenwick Neighborhood 7 21 18/ 21/ 62% 5 Fountain Springs Neighborhood 7 15 19% 26% 56% 7 Castle Rock Neighborhood 19 33 12% 32% 56% 4 Sunset Crossing Neighborhood 10 15 14% 34% 52% 24 Maple Hill Neighborhood 15 56 25% 16% 59% 8 Rancheria Neighborhood 17 38 13% 27% 60% 30 Jubilee Neighborhood 20 13 48% 32% 21% 0 Subtotal I 0 0% 100% 0% 84 C. Do you want the program continued on you streeil 103 200 22% 27% 52% Golden Pardos Neighborhood ] 0 5 Cliff Branch Neighborhood 24 1 63% 31% 6% Lycoming/Glenwick Neighborhood 10 9 l 71% 26% 3% Fountain Springs Neighborhood 14 3 37% 52% 11% Castle Rock Neighborhood 26 25 8 44% 42% 14% Sunset Crossing Neighborhood 14 13 2 48% 45% 7% Maple Hill Neighborhood 60 34 ] 63% 36% I Rancheria Neighborhood 32 20 11 51% 32% 17% Jubilee Neighborhood 22 39 2 35% 62% 3% Subtotal 0 1 0 0% 100%0% GRAND TOTAL 198 160 29 % 51 q7 / 7% 785 627 523 ** Includes surveys received up to 12/29/06 Attachment "C-2" City of Diamond Bar NTMP Neighborhood Survey Summary by Neighborhood Total No. Golden Prados Neighborhood Yes No of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 9 7 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 8 7 Do you want the program continued on you street? 10 6 Subtotal 27 20 47 57.4% Yes No Total No. Ma orit Cliff Branch Neighborhood of Votes y The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 22 11 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 21 15 Do you want the program continued on you street? 24 11 Subtotal 67 37 104 64.4% LycotninglGieriwiCk Neighborhood Yes No Total No.of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 11 15 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 10 16 Do you want the program continued on you street? 11 14 Subtotal 32 45 77 41.6% Total -No Fountain Springs NBighborhood Yes No . Majorityof Votes The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 31 25 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 30 30 Do you want the program continued on you street? 27 28 Subtotal 88 83 171 51.5% Total No. Castle' Rock Neighborhood Yes No of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 16 13 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 13 16 Do you want the program continued on you street? 14 14 Subtotal 43 43 86 50.0% Sunset Crossing Neighborhood Yes Total No. No Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 65 of Votes 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 49 32 47 Do you want the program continued on you street? 61 38 Subtotal 175 117 292 59.9% Total No. Maple Hill Neighborhood Yes No of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 29 18 I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 26 24 Do you want the program continued on you street? 33 20 Subtotal 88 62 150 58.7% Total -No. Rancheria Neighborhood Yes No of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 12 54 1 like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 12 54 Do you want the program continued on you street? 23 41 Subtotal 47 149 196 76.0% Total No. Jubilee Neighborhood Yes No of Votes Majority The devices implemented on my street (or nearby) are effective: 0 1 I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 0 1 Do you want the program continued on you street? 0 1 Subtotal 0 4 4 100.0% Totals 567 560 1127 50.3% ** Included some late surveys received after 12/29/06 Attachment "D" Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Program Comments Summary from January 20, 2007 Open House Speed Speed Humps Cushions > Meeting 0w z ,��, a ,-Q,, Time Area Comment m Q � Q —01 10:30 AM 1 Make the speed bumps less aggressive (more gradual approach and departure.) 1 1 The bumps on Sunset Crossing are too jarring. Even if you go over 10:30 AM 1 them at 10 MPH your car jolts. If you see the traffic going only 34 1 1 MPH it is because it is measuing the speed inbetween bumps. If you went 34 MPH over a bump, you would become airborne. 10:30 AM 1 1. Please address the extra 500 cars that are not using Bower Cascade 1 1 Road. 2. Remove immediately as you don't have 67% approval. I think the bumps are to big and should be modified to be more gradual going up and down the bump. I think it is hard on the vehicles. I thin 12:30 PM 1 the bumps on Navajo Springs are more gradual and longer on one 1 1 rather than two. I think there are more bumps than necessary on Sunset Crossing for showing the traffic. Need to do something regarding the speed from the SR -57 exit to the 12:30 PM 1 YMCA or change the name of that section and call id "57 speedway". Need parking signs for sweeping days. No tickets. To many "for sale" 1 1 cars park in the area. No tickets 12:30 PM 1 Would like to see speed bumps on Lower Sunset Crossing or a stop sign on Ohd Trail. - Resident of Sunset Crossing Road 1 1 We did not receive a notice of these minutes. Please put us on the 12:30 PM 1 mailing list. Resident of Sunset Crossing .... we are very interested in 1 1 slowing down the speeders, especially the motorcycles. Take the speed humps out. They are not effective. They cause a hinderance to emergency vehicles. It has slowed the fire and rescue 12:30 PM 1 vehicles to a standstill. I am at the crosswalk ground at Del Sol and Sunset Crossing and they have not slowed down that much traffic. 1 1 Take out the humps and ......dots. The parking striping was a wast of tax payers money. I live on Sunset Crossing Road and it has not really slwed down the speeders that ...... Speed cushions on Sunset Crossing do slow people down. The volume 12:30 PM 1 change in the data down Snset. They are going down Bower Cascade which has one stop sign at Alcolito Place recentlay. Keep the speed 1 1 cushions. 12:30 PM 1 I live off Sunset Crossing and Del Sol Land and I think the speed cushions are great and effective. I hope to see the speed cushions on Del Sol Lane. Yes i like it. 1 1 2:30 PM 1 People drive down center to avoid bumps. Very painful for older people. Cars to need aligning. Diminished our quality of life. 1 1 1 1 6 1 4 1 1 1 9 11 11 Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Program Comments Summary from January 20, 2007 Open House Texas Speed Dots Cushions Meeting a w" Time Area Comment F' c Love the speed cushions. Center striping is great. Texas dots are best. 10:30 AM 2 Please don't change. Please add more cushions on Cold Springs before the stop sign at Castle Rock Road.. Dots near doctors office should be 1 1 removed.They need more parking. 10:30 AM 2 Speed cushions on Fountain Springs are not necessary. Diamond Bar Boulevared is a concern because of constant street racing. 1 1 Great. Reduce the width of street. Are you building? We have enough 10:30 AM 2 congestion with two schools in the area and a businesss area on the 1 1 corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Fountain Springs. The speed bumps need to be solid acrooss, no openings for tires to get stuck in. Texas dots on Fountain Springs Road are going to be a problem because with the build-up of the shopping center tarffic (turn into shopping 10:30 AM 2 center) may back up into Diamond Bar Boulevard. There is going to be a need for a turn lane into the shopping center and a land to go around 1 1 the cars going into the shopping center. Texas dots will need to be remove. Resident of Harmony Hill - I hate these!! You're punishing everyone for it the wrong behaviour of a few. The speed cushions aggravate my back 10:30 AM 2 surgery. They do not discourage cut -through traffic only resident traffic. The City is punishing it's residents in an attempt to control 1 1 traffic patterns. The City notified over 2,000 people in regards to the program but only notified a small group prior to installation of the devices. Speed cushions go or City Council goes!! I hate them! What purpose do these speed bumps serve? There is not a 10:30 AM 2 problem with cars speeding down these streets. In fact, you are better 1 1 to go faster over them. It was arrogant of the City to put them in. The City has punished the homeowners. Get rid of them, please. 10:30 AM 2 As a 17 -year resident of the area, I have to say I am very upset over 1 1 these ridiculous speed bumps and traffic circles. They must go!! So let me see??? Cause an inconvenience to your residents in order to 10:30 AM 2 stop cut -through or speeding traffic. How about using law enforcement 1 1 to stop speeders!! 10:30 AM 2 Want a similar program along Evergreen Springs Drive north and south of Sunbright Drive. 1 1 10:30 AM 2 How can you overlook a speed bump near Diamond Bar High School with 3000 cars present every day. Fern Hollow Drive is a speed zone. I know I live there. Thank you. - Resident of Los Cerros Drive. 1 1 12:30 PM 2 s to Castle Rock Road and between Foution Springs and addar Thanks very much, great job.I I think the work you have done is great. Please add spIgot 1Boulevard. PM 2 lived on Castle Rock Road for 15 years. The speed cusedin this are do not work. They did not calm down the mondtrucks speed. They bring a lot of inconvenience to our liy2:30 we have to pass at lease 10 pumpers to work. Our two c1 damages twice since pumpers were built. Plus, my child gets scared when passing the bumpers. People and children play around the speed cushions. It is very dangerous. Our neighbor also have such opinion. We all want the City to remove these speed cushions. Thank you. 1 2:30 PM 2 The speed chshions do not work and the Texas dots should be removed and a right-hand turn lane should be installed. The speed limit on Fountain Springs is 25 MPH, why do you want to lower it? 1 1 2:30 PM 2 The devices are unsightly and surely have some effect because people should slow down, but I've had the experience where cars have passed me on my left because they did not want to wait, thus causing a less safe environment. I have not figured out why there are the large bumps placed across from the exit by the town cemetery off Fountain Springs. If you are trying to slow traffic, why don't you install stop 1 1 signs. 3 9 2 4 8 1 2 14 14 Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Program Comments Summary from January 20, 2007 Open House Traffic Texas Speed Circle Dots Humps >v C > C > > C Meeting >o w C) w Time Area Comment n� q a Q a Q a 7030 AM 3 Good job. I like everything you have done. 1 .. 1 1 .. Rancheria and Casa Loma traffic circle is very confusing when I went 10:30 AM 3 through there. Recommendations are stop signs with a cushion gong 1 1 1 down north onto Golden Springs. The two speed cushions are enough on Jubilee Lane. My neighbors and I feel that they were unnecessary anyway! There has not been a speeding problem or unsafe conditions on this street. People walk their dogs and jog regularly. The cushions have caused a new problem with 10:30 AM 3 cars having to park on them and kids going over them with 1 1 1 skateboards. We see more negative activity now more than ever. Trash and postman have an inconvenience, and the street gets dirty. Please remove the unnecessary large speed cushions and the confusing Texas Dots that connect with Jubilee. We all rather see smaller speed bumps or a slow down or yield or stop sign. Thank you. 1 am a 27 -year resident of Golden Prados Drive and I believe the speed control measures implemented on this street have lowered the quality of my enjoyment of my home and neighborhooed. The Texas Speed Dots at the Golden Prados/Golden Springs intersection is particularly 10:30 AM 3 troublesome. When cars are parked on the side of the street and a car door opens, ther is not adequate space for passage without running 1 1 1 over the bumps cause a near loss of control of car and near accidents. Thsi problem should be eliminated immediately byu removing the speed bumps. [am in favor of removing the speed bumps as well, I would be happy if the entire measures on Golden Prados are eliminated. - 821 S. Golden Prados Drive. Overall, the program has been quite ridiculous. The Texas speed bumps and parked cars do not mesh together and have almost cause residents to lose control of their vehicles. The cars who choose to speed 10:30 AM 3 still do ..... the UPS man. There are other issues of concern, like the 1 1 1 increased vandalism and assaults at CVS and purse -snatching at Vun's. This is a waste of taxpayers dollars, and "all treatments" should he. removed immediately. Texas dots are not effective on Rancheria and Casa Looma also a phone service panel is in the red zone and some phone trucks park forcing traffic to drive through circle. Some residents cut on wrong side of 10:30 AM 3 street almost causing head on collisions and most disregard dots 1 1 1 altogether choosing to drive straight when you are going around poeple pass on the left. Plus, the sound makes it very difficult to sleep. We need stop signs on Casa Loma and Rancheria at Maple Springs the speed bumps are funbumps to most local residents. Resident of Casa Loma Drive - Remove traffic circle at Rancheria and 10:30 AM 3 Casa Loma Drive. If downhill speed reduction is necessary, install stop 1 1 sign on Rancheria at Maple Springs. 1 Pleaes get rid of the Texas Dots. I have lived on the corner of Rancheria Road and Jubilee Land for 28 years and to my knowledge 10:30 AM 3 never had a traffic accident. No we have young girls sitting in the middle of the circle and kids skateboarding around it. It is a disaster! 1 1 1 Also, it is close to impossible to clear the dots and the cars parked on the curb to turn into my driveway. Speed cushions is a good concept but needs to be improved. Cars/trucks speed up and drive right through them. The current ones do not work. 10.30 AM 3 Texas Dots - should be changed to a pattern that works. The current circles do not work. It causes near misses. Suggest charring the 1 1 1 pattern. - Simple stop signs should work with a change of the Texas Dots pattern. I hold the City Council members responsible for this flawed process where only a few are ultimately surveyed. What about the non -Eng. 10:30 AM 3 Population. You have lost my vote. No problem on Rancheria that 1 1 1 a 4-way/3-way stop sign would not have fixed. People go the wrong way on these circles for a short cut. there will be a head-on collision. It's ugly - putting flowers in the middles won't help. Golden Prados - The Texas Dots in front of 729 are dangerous. People 10:30 AM 3 can't pull out of this driveway. You have lowered the property value. There was no problem there before. We do not need this. The speed 1 1 1 bumps are placed so that our cars parked in front of our homes are in danger of being hit by people swerving to avoid the bumps. Resident of Rancheria Road - I feel the traffic circle is more of a hazard than a help. Traffic still exceeds the speed limit on Rancheria. I thnk 10:30 AM 3 the speed cushions and striping would be more effective. Trash trucks drive ove the Dots because they cannot make the circle. The circles are more hazardous - need stop signs and speed cushions on Rancheria - + center line. 10:30 AM 3 They cause me to use more fuel and excessive use on undercarriage 1 1 1 pats of my autos. I think thay are a was of my tax dollars. Remove traffic circles and speed bumps on Rancheria and Jubilee Lane. Return street to original condition. Use sheriff to enforce traffic codes. 10:30 AM 3 I have almost been 2 accidents and Jubilee and Rancheria because of 1 1 1 traffic circle. Also my wife who has back problems suffers severe pain going over the speed bumps. 28-year resident on Jubilee. Remove the Texas Dots. I am a retired LAPD officer. This circle is flawed very much a larger traffic hazard 10:30 AM 3 than before. I've had 7 near misses in less than three months. It is not 1 1 a matter of if I am going to have an accident but when! Comments of 1 friends are - What's wrong with your neighborhood. Last, young teenagers use the circles as a hangout. What were you thinking! 10:30 AM 3 Please reove the danger circles and replace with stop signs - on Rancheria. Thank you. 12:30 PM 3 The traffic circle installed at Area 3 is not working, It slows down and also confuses drivers. I think stop sign will be effective. 1 1 1 12:30 PM 3 Highly approve the dots area. I live on Meadcliff Place. I hate, repeat hate the traffic circles on 1 1 1 12:30 PM 3 Rancheria. Please remove them ASAP. Thanks. Stop signs would be 1 1 1 fine. Please remove the texas dots. Stops signs would be more effective and 12:30 PM 3 cheaper. There is not enough traffic to warrant this drastic traffic 1 1 control. Also, the traffic circles are confusing. 1 Area 3 Jublilee. Speed bumps and circle projects are unnecessary at 12:30 PM 3 this time. Bump (circle) post more of a safety concern, e.g. kids playing dodge ball and ......in to traffic. Try installing stop signs and/or enforce 1 1 1 existing rules and codes. The dots may slow down traffic, but it also creates more accidents. 12:30 PM 3 They are confusing. Teenagers play in the circles, big trucks, trailers and company trucks cannot maneauver arount them. We feel like we 1 1 1 are in a trap. Please think about STOP signs instead. I live on the corner of Casa Loma and Rancheria. I agree something 12:30 PM 3 must be done, but the traffic circle is not working. The downhill traffic 1 1 1 is still moving more quickly down the street. In addition, the people who are going from Casa Loma Drive to Rancheria are exposed. I totally disagree with the two sites with bumps on Jubilee Lane and the circle on Ranceria and Jubilee intersection. This is supposed to be 12:30 PM 3 an engineering project and there seems to be no precision in the design of the said circle. There is uneven spacing between the ... and nearest 1 1 1 point on the footpath. I have spoken to most of the neighbors around me and none of us are in favor of this project on any street. The money would be better spent on road improvements. 2.30 PM 3 1 would like to see the traffic circle on Rancheria removed. A yield sign would be fine. I see no need for traffic barriers in this area since ther 1 1 1 have be no accidents. - Resident of East Alada Drive. It was nice having open house regarding circles on Rancheria. I 2:30 PM 3 strongly oppose . It is more dangerous and I see all the time people not yielding nor going in circle. Thanks for the open house but I strongly 1 1 1 oppose. The traffic circles on Rancheria Road cause a serious safety concern. The drivers do not understand or violate the propler direction/right of way at the circles. Pedestrians are at risk as there are no specified 2:30 PM 3 crosswalks and drives have not heeded as I walk my grandson across 1 1 1 the street in his stroller. I propose stop signs at these two locations in order to reduce speed and risks of accidents. - Resident of Rancheria Road. 2:30 PM 3 1 would like to see speed cushions put in on Charmingdale Road - Resident of Charmingdale Road. 1 1 1 Please get rid of the Texas dots at Golden Prados Drive and Hopi. Very hard to turn left onto Hopi coming down Golden Prados. I saw a UPS 2:30 PM 3 truck get into those dots and I am glad it wasn't me. The speed 1 1 1 cushions are a joke. I don't see anyone slowing down for them. The cushion should be all the way across to be really effective. I love you idea of roundabouts. Quite nice and easier to use. The traffic circles are very unsafe. They are too wide with not enough leeway, (15 - 19 feet) which is not enough room for carts/trucks to pass. Trash trucks, Hummers and a fire engine were seen just going over the bumps/passing into the circle, I personally have experience near -miss 2:30 PM 3 accidents becuse people do not know what to do. Theyd don't do the 1 1 1 "right of way" concept or pass over the bumps and stop in the middle. I was nearly stuck by a school bus. I thnk lines should be painted on the road with yield signs and or stop signs. these would seem more appropriate and are cheap to install and require little upkeep compared to a traffic circle. 2:30 PM 3 Circle very unsafe. Most card cut the circle insteaed of going around. No pedestrian crossings. Someone is going to get hurt. 1 1 1 1. Can we please have signs at Diamond Bar Boulevard and the Tim and also at Golden Prados and Golden Springs that say local access 2.30 PM 3 only or no right -turn between certain hours to keep poele from cutting through. 2. We would like to see speed bumps on Bridle Drive between 1 1 1 Tim and Golden Prados. 3. We need a stop sign at Bridle Drive and Golden Prados gonig southbound. People drive at speeds of 40 MPH going down Bridle turning right at Golden Prados. Thank you. A major safety hazard - no pedestrian crossing. Very unsafe to make the circle many cars have hit the curb. Kids have been sitting in the 2:30 PM 3 middle of the circle. Most important, most cars have been taking the 1 1 1 short way in making a left -turn effectively going the wrong way (clockwise). Rancheria and Casa Loma Traffic Circle - people do not understand 2:30 PM 3 how it works and people do not yield. Why can't you just put in stop 1 1 1 signs. 2 27 5 2 14 18 1 11H22 34 34 34 Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Program Comments Summary from January 20, 2007 Open House Texas 4 1 2 1 3 9 10 Dots IV > Meeting 1 o a s� w Time Area Comment Q a 10:30 AM 4 Bella Pine has a few too many cushions wher the stop sign is. Maple Hill is perfect. 1 Northbound Grand between Diamond Bar Boulevard and Golden Springs. There's a right-hand turn lane for condo complex only. People 10:30 AM 4 are using it to get ahead of other cars waiting to make right-hand turn onto Golden Springs. Certain times of day long line of card in right 1 lane - wait times often multiple light changes. 2 lanes for left really not needed, on would do. People drive from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Kiowa Crest to Birds Eye Drive are driving fast. I suggest a stop sign on th corner of Birds Eye 10:30 AM 4 and Maple Hill. I live at the corner of Birds Eye and Maple Hill and 1 belive me peple are speeding and also there is a school on Maple Hill which creates a lot of traffic. Thank you. This feedback relates to Maple Hill Road. The first set of "speed 10:30 AM 4 cushions" before Blenbury as you go up Maple Hill do not stop speeders. The only thing that will truly impact themn will be to put stop signs at 1 the corner of Maple Hill Road and Blenbury. I would like to evaluate traffic patterns surrounding the Cliffbranch 10:30 AM 4 area. As an alternative route during peak hours (work and high school) is: Evergreen Springs -> Cliffbranch. I feel that a speed calming device 1 such as a speed hump is warranted on Bela Pine between Viento Vera no and Leaning Pine. Thank you. - Resident of Bella Pine Drive. Put in Texas dots in the following areas: along Diamond Bar Boulevard 12:30 PM 4 going to appts and condos in white marked off areas - people drive 1 down side of the road. 12:30 PM 4 Take 'em out! Thank you. Speed cushions and signage OK. 1 Put reflective markers on -street to create two lanes, one for each way, 12:30 PM 4 on Cliff Branch Drive and Maple Hill to slow down traffic and create a defined land to Olive Lane. People are driving down the middle of the 1 road. - Resident of Cliffbranch. We feel the traffic pattern for Chaparrel is very good. We believe that 2:30 PM 4 Ironbark and Spruce Hill because they are hilly would benefit form yellow center strips. People often travel up/down the middle of the 1 street. We hope never to have speed cushions. 4 1 2 1 3 9 10 Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Program Comments Summary from January 20, 2007 Open House Meeting Time Area Comment 10:30 AM 5 Speed bumps slows down traffic and make it impossible to get in and out of our park 10:30 AM5 Texas dots are wonderful. Keeps drives on the correct side and lane of the road. Speed cushions are great. Lycoming Street hs become a speed zone. The speed bumps helps slow 10:30 AM 5 traffic and makes it easier to get in and out of our park. The Sheriffs department is doing an excellent job in this matter. 10:30 AM 5 Lycoming is being used as a freeway on-ramp leading to Fairway. Sto signs: 3 -way at Glenwick and Lycoming (school crossing), 4 -way at Penarth and Lycoming, 3 -way at Lycoming and Mobile Home Park. I live on Lycoming Street. The speed bumps are effective in slowing traffic but the noise created by the trucks which are illegal offset the 12:30 PM 5 slowing of the speeders. If the trucks could be kept off this street, then the bumps are a reasonable solution. Perhaps bigger signs at eachend of Lycoming stating "no trucks" might help. We need more law enforcement. Ask Sysco for their help informing truck drives who make deliveries to staff off Lycoming. Speed bump and Texas dots have helped some but folks aren't slowing 2:30 PM 5 down any more like they did at first. The big semi traffic has to stop! Bigger signage at off -ramps for trucks so they know they can't turn right off the freeway. Place a high obstruction north of 60 westbound off -ramp to keep trucks 2:30 PM 5 from turinng right (north) on Brea Canyon Road. They end up in dead end and have to go down Lycoming Street. Truck traffic on Brea Canyon Boulevard northbound. We like the effect on Lycoming. Please, please take S. Calbourne 2:30 PM 5 ...into next consideration at the 2/6 meeting. Let us a cut thru with excessive speed. Resident of S. Calbourne. 11 p Texas Speed Dots Humps N Q > 0cc - a N it L Q' W N 5�y Q N W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 20 2 3 4 4 Attachment "E" 1.4.1 Getting Started The first step in the process entails assessing the need. In this step staff will work with the residents within each district and unique neighborhood to develop public awareness of the problem, document the issues and meet with the stakeholders. This will include the following: • The City receives a request to mitigate a traffic concern. • A brochure will be sent out to the affected residents which outline the NTMP process. Figure 2 illustrates the NTMP district boundaries. • A meeting for the residents along the affected street will be held to discuss their concerns and gather first-hand information. • Staff will develop a proposed action plan after data on the affected street(s) is collected and field observations have been performed. • Data will be collected to assist in the analysis of the problem. Depending on the problem, this may include traffic volumes, vehicular speeds, or simple visual observation by staff. • The residents will then be invited to a second meeting to discuss the proposed action plan. 1.4.2 Evaluation The second step is the evaluation phase where staff will perform a variety of planning and engineering analyses to solve the problem at hand. This step will include the following: • At the second meeting, the results of the data collection and field observation process will be presented. • Staff will also present a preliminary list of tools and strategies for residents to consider. The tools will be carefully selected to address their specific problems. • The most cost effective tools will be identified. • If necessary, other affected agencies will be contacted for review and approval of the plan. This might include the fire department or the sheriff. • A conceptual plan will be prepared for residents to consider. The conceptual plan will identify the tools being considered and potential areas for implementation. • Residents attending the meeting will be informed of the requirement of a 67% majority consensus of the residents living along the affected street. • A survey packet will then be mailed to the residents of the affected street in order to obtain a 67% majority consensus. 1.4.3 Approval The third step is the approval process. In this step • If a mailing from the City to the affected residents does not accumulate a majority consensus, then the original resident(s) requesting the improvements will be required to obtain the consensus through a petition process *. • The proposed action plan will be submitted to the Traffic and Transportation Commission for review and forwarded to City Council for approval. • Improvements will only be installed with a majority consensus from the residents. Attachment "F" I NTMP PILOT PROJECT Agenda # 8.3 Meeting Date: 2/6/07 CITY COUNCIL -�' AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Mana er TITLE: Consideration of Batting Cages at eterson and Pantera Parks RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the plan to construct batting cages at both Peterson and Pantera Parks as a single construction project. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends approval of the plan to construct batting cages at Peterson Park only at this time, The Commission further recommends evaluating the use of the batting cages at Peterson Park after they are constructed and to consider constructing batting cages at Pantera Park after the evaluation of the Peterson Park batting cages is complete. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Estimated cost for two batting cages at: Peterson Park: $66,846 Pantera Park: $65,823 Total estimated cost (if constructed as a single project): $132,669* Amount appropriated in 2006/07 FY budget for this project: $149,650 * Staff estimates it will cost about 5% more (+/- $6,600) to split the two parks into two separate construction projects. BACKGROUND: In early 2004, City Council, city staff, and local sports organizations met several times to discuss the needs of the various sports organizations and to create ideas where new park space could be acquired for sports facilities and to determine methods to make the use of the City's limited athletic field space more efficient. While additional park space has not been acquired, the task force did recognize the need for precise scheduling and maximizing use of field space. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended research into batting cages to. allow fields to be used for other activities, rather than batting practice. This would allow youth baseball and softball players to maximize their, limited time on City fields. After visiting Peterson and Pantera Parks with Landscape Architects Jeff Scott and Liz Del Turco from David Evans and Associates, it was determined that both these locations would provide excellent opportunities for quality batting cages. A conceptual plan for the batting cages was developed and the plan was presented at public meetings conducted for the Peterson Park and Pantera Park neighborhoods. The meeting at Pantera Park was held on Thursday, October 19, 2006 in the Pantera Park Activity Room beginning at 6:30 pm. Notices were mailed to 148 addresses located within 1000 feet of Pantera Park. Fifteen residents attended the meeting and there were speakers both in favor and against the project. Those in favor of the project expressed that the batting cages would make for a more efficient use of the park space by allowing soccer teams to practice in the outfield grass while Girls Softball and Little League teams could practice on the infield, with batting practice taking place in the batting cages. Those in favor also said the batting cages would make batting practice safer by preventing foul balls from leaving the playing field. Those against the batting cages were concerned the batting cages would disturb nearby residents, park visitors and the wildlife in the natural areas adjacent to the park and interfere with the beauty of the park. One of the people against the batting cages collected 338 signatures in a petition requesting the City to find a more suitable site. The petition was presented to the City Council at their meeting on November 21, 2006. In an effort to respond to the concerns expressed, staff organized a simulated batting cage demonstration that was conducted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 at 6:30 to 7:30pm at Pantera Park. Notices of the batting cage simulation were mailed to 148 addresses located within 1000 feet of Pantera Park. Twelve people attended the simulation. Two noise meters were used by staff to measure the decibel levels that resulted from the batting practice simulation. The highest decibel readings recorded at the perimeter of the park was 55. The ambient decibel level at the same locations was 50; and for comparison, a passing car recorded a decibel level of 70. Please see the attached graphic of Pantera Park showing decibel levels that were recorded. The meeting for the Peterson Park neighborhood was held on Monday, October 23 at Diamond Point Elementary School beginning at 6:30 pm. Notices were mailed to 209 addresses located within 1000 feet of Peterson Park. Seven people attended the meeting and several spoke in favor of batting cages at Peterson Park and none were against it. There was no batting cage simulation conducted at Peterson Park, but staff did record ambient decibel levels at the park on December 13, 2006. Ambient level at the west driveway to Peterson Park was 60, and the ambient level at the east driveway was 55. The Parks and Recreation Commission considered the batting cages for Peterson and Pantera Parks at their regular, meeting on January 25, 2007. Notices were mailed to 357 addresses located within 1000 feet of Peterson and Pantera Parks. Three members of the public spoke at the Commission meeting. Two spoke in favor of batting cages at both Peterson and Pantera Parks and the other speaker questioned the need and the cost for batting cages at Pantera Park. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted to recommend to the City Council the construction of the batting cages at Peterson Park. The Commission then voted to recommend to the City Council that the construction of batting cages be delayed at Pantera Park until after the batting cages at Peterson Park have been constructed and a review of the use of the Peterson Park batting cages was completed. The purpose of the review is to: 1) Determine the use pattern of the batting cages 2) Visualize how the batting cages might look at Pantera Park based on the look of Peterson Park 3) Determine if there are lighting issues or any safety issues 4) Provide time to develop and refine a use policy for the batting cages. The majority of the Commission did make it clear they do not oppose the eventual construction of batting cages at Pantera Park. DISCUSSION: Staff proposes to construct two batting cages at two park sites, Peterson and Pantera Parks, as a single construction project. The batting cages at Peterson Park would be located in a single structure on the first base side of the ball field near Golden, Springs Drive. The batting Fy.-ends . 47 �• a_ w r m w a� ,y TM '-41 t f M F• Ae its '-L , `--r�� , ♦ .I - �s®b� ,cis - -. - DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Page 1 of 1 City of Diamond Bar PETERSON PARK Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Updated: February 01, 2007 ITEMS - PARK SITE (ONLY) MOBILIZATION Qry UNIT UNIT COST SUBTOTAL BASE COST EXTENSION OF EXTENSION BASE COST TOTALS 1 Contractors Mobilization (Including permits and temporary services) - Assume 2% of Budget +/- 1 Allow 2% $ 1,304.08 2 TEmporary Construction Fencing 250 LF $ 1.35 $ 337.50 Sub -Total $ 1,641.58 GRADING and EARTHWORK 3 Site GradinQ Export 18 CY $ 32.00 $ 576.00 Sub -Total S 576.00 DEMOLITION 4 5 Turf Removal—TF— Relocate Catch Basin 1 SF EA $ 1.30 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,675.40 $ 3,000.00 Sub -Total $ 5,675.40 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 6 7 8 4" D.G. for Baiting Cage 6" IVtowcurb Battin Ca a 4" Concrete Walkway/ Stain Area 14B$ 825$ 1,530;EA $ 4.50 8.50 8.50 $ 6,885.00 $ 1,258.00 $ 7,012.50 Sub -Total $ 15,155.50 CHAIINLINK FENCING 9 6'E:nt Gates 2$ 291.00 S 582.00 10 11 12 13 2x8 Redwood Backboard 48" High Mounted on Inside of Caja w/ Rubber Padding 4000 Twine DuPont Nettin IL4,920 12' Hi2h Chain Link Fence Sides 24" Wide Chain Link Fence Roof 2 245 1,530 EA SF LF SF $ 1,500.00 $ 2.00 $ 65.00 $ 5.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,840.00 $ 15,925.00 $ 7,650.00 Sub -Total $ 36,997.00 UTILITIES AND LIGHTING 14 Electrical Outlet for BattingMachine 1 EA $ 350.00 —$-350 15 V E=lectrical Conduit 230 LF $ 15.00 .00 $ 3,450.00 Sub -Total $ 3,800.00 PLANTING and IRRIGATION 17 Soil Prep, Fine Gradino. and Sod 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 18 Turf 1 LS $ 1,5o0A0 $ 1,500.00 Sub -Total $ 3,000.00 PARK SITE TOTA $ 66,845.48 5% CONTINGENCY $ 3,342.27 ITEMS -PARK SITE (ONLY) ADD --STY ALTERNATES UNITUNIT COST GRAND TOTAL SUB TOTAL BASE COST $ 70,187.75 EXTENSION OF EXTENSION BASE COST TOTALS ARCHITECTURE 19 20 21 Shade Structures 26x60 Steel Structure Shade Structures 26x60 Fabric Structure BattingCage Lights 1 1 1 EA EA LS T9-0 $ go, DOo.00 0.00 1.00 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 22 4" Concrete Pavingfor Battin Ca—2e 4" Thick Concrete Home Plate (colored concrete) with23 Schofield Lithocrele Color Hardener 1,530 3 SF SF T12.00$ 6.00 24 9" Thick Conc, Batters Box Colored Concrete w/ Schofield Lithocrete Color Hardner. 96 SF $ 12.00 $ 1,152.00 SPORTS EQUIPTMENT 25 Pitching Machine EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 Page 1 of 1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Page 1 of 1 City of Diamond Bar PANTERA PARK Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Updated: February 01, 2007 ITEMS - PARK SITE •) MOBILIZATION QTY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL• BASE •ST OF • BASE •ST • TALS 1 Contractors Mobilization (Including permits and temporary services) - Assume 2% of Budget +/_ 1 Allow, 2% $ 1,284.02 2 Temporary Construction Fencing 250 LF $ 1.35 $ 337.50 Sub -Total $ 1,621.52 GRADING and EARTHWORK 3 Site Gradin / Export 18 CY $ 32.00 $ 576.00 Sub -Total $ 576.00 DEMOLITION 4 Turf Removal 1,530 SF $ 1.30 $ 1,989.00 5 Relocate Catch Basin 2 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 6 Relocate Walkway Light Pole 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Sub -Total PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 4" D.G. for Baffin Cage 1,530 SF $ 4.50 $ 6,885.00 M$7 7 6" Mowcurb Baffin Cage 74 LF $ 8.50 $ 629.00 Sub -Total WALLS AND FENCES 8 18" High Wall at Perimeter Fence 85 LF $ 40.00 $ 3,400.00 CHAJNLINK FENCING $ 3,400.00 9 6"JEntry Gates 2 EA $ 291.00 $ 582.00 10 2x8 Redwood Backboard 4a" High Mounted on Inside of Cage w/ Rubber Padding 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 11 4000 Twine DuPont Netting 41920 SF $ 2.00 $ 9,840.00 12 12High Chain Link Fence Sides 2451 LF $ 65.00 $ 15,925.00 13 24" Wide Chain Link Fence Roof 1,530 SF $ 5.00 $ 7,650.00 Sub -Total $ 36,997.00 UTILITIES AND LIGHTING 14 1" Electrical Conduit 125 LF $ 15.00 $ 1,875.00 15 Electrical Outlet for Batbn2 Machine 1 EA $ 350.00 $ 350.00 Sub -Total S 2,225.00 PLANTING and IRRIGATION 16 Soil Prep, Fine Grading, and Sod 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 17 Turf 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Sub -Total $ 3,000.00 PARK SITE TOTAL $ 65,822.52 5% CONTINGENCY$ 3,291.13 ITEMS - PARK SITE • • • ALTERNATES ARCHITECTURE • GRAND TOTA •TAL BASE COST $ 69,113.65 EXTENSION OF • BASE COSTTOTALS 18 Shade Structures 26x60 Steel Shelter 1 EA $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 19 Shade Structures 26x60 Fabric Shelter 1 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 20 Ba tmg Cage Lights 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 21 4" Concrete Paving for Batting Cage 1,530 SF $ 8.50 $ 13,005.00 22 4" Thick Concrete Home Plate (colored concrete) with Schofield Litho rete Color Hardener 3 SF $ 12.00 $ 36.00 It 23 9" Thick Conc, Batter's Box Colored Concrete w/ SchofieldLithocreteColor Hardner. 96 SF 1 $ 12.00 1 $ 1,152.00 SPORTS EQUIPTMEN7 1i EE 24 Pitching Machine 2 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 Page 1 of 1 10 C,✓ 0 LO Itt to 4" THICH COLORED CONCRETE WITH SCHOFIELD (Optional) LITHOCRETE COLOR HARDNER AT BATTER'S BOX. COLOR TO BE TILE RED (COLOR A-28) AVAILABLE FIR, vM L.i1. SCHQFIELD. (3L3) 72V-3VVV 2X8 REDWOOD BACKBOARD 48" 4" THICK COLORED CONCRETE WITH SCHOFIELD (Op.) HIGH MOUNTED ON LITHOCRETE COLOR HARDNER AT HOME PLATE. SHADE STRUCTURE INSIDE OF CAGE COLOR TO BE CHALK BLUE (COLOR 1037) ROOF (op.) RUBBER PADDING AVAILABLE FROM L.M. SCHOFIELD /-- 8" WIDE TYPICAL (323) 720-3000 CONCRETE 9" RETAINING WALL 60' SUMP DRAIN — — O •STRUCTURE WITH GRATE S E �NAfJ"QNIC4 PER DETAIL GAS " THIS SHEET I 1 CONCRETE • 0 .: TYPICdL:r •RAL ELECTRICAL NA 00 LO II ti CONNECTION N O .• ' LIM OF CONC. ,' �.', :.�-. — .: UNK 8;" WIDE co • ' LtJ S (Bp•) N I �... NATU. L• RAQE' . E'AK• , � .. .., . , " 4 RED PAINTED GATE : '`^ ., E• LETTERING 'CAUTION' • 3 ':.: . ,.. n. CHAIN — — LINK 2X8 REDWOOD GATE FENCE BACKBOARD 48" 4" CONCRETE PAVING (0 ) CHAIN LINK � ELECTRICAL HIGH MOUNTED ON PER DETAIL THIS SHEET FENCE CONNECTION INSIDE OF CAGE 4000 TWINE DUPONT NETTING BALL COLLECTION 1 3/4" MESH AREA \D Et - OP SCALE: 1"=1'-0" Op. = Optional Element / Building Materia]_ s c SOCIP� BATTING CAGE (View from Above) WELD 2" HORIZONTAL WELD 2" HORIZONTAL WELD 2" HORIZONTAL POST TO 3" VERTICAL POST TO 3" VERTICAL POST TO 3" VERTICAL rPOSTo, TYP� � 10' � rPOSTO, TYP.1 � 1 � POST � TYP. / \ 0 rUGK 10 �. lel �0P • -- - ^ (°P �) -- - ^ UGW (0P' 11 � (°P •) Mg �Op SCALE: 1 -1/2"=l' -Om SIDE ELEVATION (Side View) cV STRECHER BAR- TYP. 'CHAIN LINK FENCE PER SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE FOOTING- TYP. EXISTING CHAINI FENCE PROTECT PLACE 2X8 REDWOOD BACKBOARD 48" HIGH MOUNTED INSIDE OF CAGE 4" CONCRETE P PER DETAIL THK (Op.) CONCRETE FOOT (TYP.) PER DET) THIS SHEET. 4" CONCRETE P�....._ PER DETAIL THIS SHEET (Op•) Op. = Optional Element / Building Material SCALE: 1-1/2"=l'—O" ELEVATION C (End View) FENCE CATIONS Exhibit B 1,703,845 991,700 0 693,000 84,755 Traffic Management /Safety Projects 14699 Brea Cyn Cutoff @ SB 57 OnfOff Ramp 22307 Neighborhood Traffic Management Mitigations 23007 DB Blvd/Golden Sprgs Mod 22907 BCR/Golden Sprgs Mod 23107 Golden Sprgs @Racquet Club 23207 Interconnect Links 23307 TC - Prspctrs Rd (SS Xng & Gdn Spgs) & Sunset Xing Rd (DB Blvd & Prospector) Total - Traffic Projects Total Road/Traffic Imp - FY06-07 ,arKs and Rec Improvements 15704' Sycamore Cyn Pk - ADA Retrofit Phase III 21506' Pantera Park Storerooms, Restrooms & Drink Fin 21606• Paul C. Grow ADA Retro -Construction 21706' Trail Access - DBC/Clear Crk @ Steep Cyn 23407 DBC - Emergency Generator 23507 Batting Cages - Peterson & Pantera Parks 250,000 125,000 125,000 120,000 120,000 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 165,000 120,000 650,000 165,000 250,000 30,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REVISED 02/05/07 LIST- Mid Year FY 06-07 ro'eCt # Pro-ect Deseri tion treat Improvement Total Cost Prop A - TEA -LL / STP. Gen Fd Ga s TeX Transit 2005 Fed Approp Act Tr Cngstn Rif / State HES Developer TDA- Bikeways & Projects Pro C (Sect. 117) Program Fees 18604' Grand Ave BB - Phase II, Montefino to Rolling Knl 1,680,000 Trails 18605 Grand Ave B/8 - Phase III, Mi Knl to E. Ci Limit � City 1,650,000 243,008 935,845 470,064 01406` Slurry Seal/Oveday - Area 2 748,000 306,692 273,400 768,000 521,636 31,083 01407 Slurry Seal/Overlay - Area 3 219,600 53,672 21006 Prospectors Rd -Sunset to Gldn Spgs 8770,000 877,150 750,000 255,000 22706 Washington St. Cul -De -Sac 251,150 188,000 23906 Arterial Slurry Seal - Zone 1 100,000 100,000 438,000 300,000 300,000 Total -Street Improvement Projects 6,105,150 2,124,250 507,600 0 0 1,703,845 991,700 0 693,000 84,755 Traffic Management /Safety Projects 14699 Brea Cyn Cutoff @ SB 57 OnfOff Ramp 22307 Neighborhood Traffic Management Mitigations 23007 DB Blvd/Golden Sprgs Mod 22907 BCR/Golden Sprgs Mod 23107 Golden Sprgs @Racquet Club 23207 Interconnect Links 23307 TC - Prspctrs Rd (SS Xng & Gdn Spgs) & Sunset Xing Rd (DB Blvd & Prospector) Total - Traffic Projects Total Road/Traffic Imp - FY06-07 ,arKs and Rec Improvements 15704' Sycamore Cyn Pk - ADA Retrofit Phase III 21506' Pantera Park Storerooms, Restrooms & Drink Fin 21606• Paul C. Grow ADA Retro -Construction 21706' Trail Access - DBC/Clear Crk @ Steep Cyn 23407 DBC - Emergency Generator 23507 Batting Cages - Peterson & Pantera Parks 250,000 125,000 125,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 165,000 120,000 650,000 165,000 250,000 30,000 650,000 250,000 220,000 1,680,000 155,000 0 0 1,055,000 0 0 220,000 250,000 0 7,785,150 2,279,250 507,600 0 1,055,000 1,703,845 991,700 220,000 943,000 84,755 1,536,880 256,800 50,000 691,880 795,000 101,831115,000 116,800 101,831 25,000 140,000 147,500 147,500 140,000 149,650 149,650 TOTAL 2,332,661 147,500 101,831 165,000 0 958,330 795,000 140,000 25,000 Project # Project Description liscellaneous improvements - """' �� �ur3� Pro 12 Pro 40 Park Dev Func 19403 DBC - Slope Repair 305,000 305,000 22006' Landscape Imp - Fallowfield 165,000 165,000 22206' Pkwy/Lndscpe Imp - Prspctrs/SS Xing, Navajo Spg 0 20705• Lorbeer Ball Field 750,000 23607 School Area Curb Ramp Installation 201,258750,000 23707 Site XR - Brea Canyon Rd/DB Blvd 201,258 0 0 23807 Lndscpe/Drainage Imp - Gold Rush East of DBB 30,000 30,000 TOTAL 1,451,258 500,000 201,258 0 0 0 750,000 p 0 p FY 06-07 ClP Projects Grand Tota/ 511,569,069 ' Carry -Over from FY05-06 Exhibit B CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST- Mid Year REVISED 02/05/07 FY 06-07 Funding Source Totals General Fund CIP Project Type Totals Gas Tax Fund 2,926,750 Street Improvements Prop A - Transit Fund 507,600 Traffic Control Improvements Prop C - Transit Fund 0 Park and Rec. Improvements TEA -LU 1,055,000 Miscellaneous Improvements STP -L 768,000 2004 Approp Act (Sect 117) 935,845991,700 State HES Program TDA -Bikeways & Trails 220,000 Traffic Congestion Relief Funds 84,755 Developer Fees 693,000 CDBG Fund 250,000 Prop 12 - Park Grant 303,089 Prop 40 - Park Grant 165,000 Rivers & Mountains Conservancy 0 Park Development Fund 140,000 Prop A - Safe Parks 1,708,330 Donations 795,000 LLAD 38 25,000 0 $11,569,069 6,105,150 1,680,000 2,332,661 1,451,258 $11,569,069 UL1IOND Bal Gity ot Diamond. Neighborhood Traffic Management•• V v _ a Presentation to., k '� •~ k Diamond Bar City Council' c � -- Regarding The- ML` _AL 11 = Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Management Program k February 6 2007` "Prepared AAKatz, Okitsu & Associates Planning and Engineering P - z City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program In 2003/2004 Council heard neighborhood traffic problems were a major concern. tr In 2005 NTMP Process was undertaken. err That year multiple meetings were held in all 5 residential districts. Issues/problems were identified by meeting participants. to Tools/solutions were presented to the participants for design and implementation. At the onset, the City was divided into 5 areas for analytical purposes r s it o R ; -.-._._.-.---- N City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program October 2005... The City decided to proceed with the following: to Seed the Citywide NTMP via a Pilot Program. w Input received from residents at each of the district meetings. Measures for each pilot project developed for the 5 areas. to Work with the FY 2005-06 allocated budget. w Choose 1 or more streets from each district to install a pilot project. w T & T Commission recommended the pilot projects to Council. w Council approved and staff moved forward with design plans and installation. City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program irr The pilot projects were installed in the fall of 2006. kv Input from the community has been received via phone calls, e-mails and public outreach. t(ir Some changes to the Pilot Program are in order. URVIOND MIR Today Area 2 Measures COLD SPRINGS Speed Cushions Area 2 Measures CASTLE ROCK Speed Cushions Centerline Striping Texas Dots Area 2 Measures FOUNTAIN SPRINGS Speed Cushions Parking Lane Striping Texas Dots DLL►IOU BjR AW OOF' "Oor V' DLVIOND BAR •,yA t„4 . V. ,. .. 4 DLL IM BIR T Area 3 Mwmres RANCHERIA / IPI ® Casa Loma l yt, �m O a, n traaeL @Jubllae „tee+ Aga Traft Circle a' p v Striping With Texas C1O06 i.�kseEa l R Area 3, Mossum ,Uu�nt ora n JU�11t.�- 8000d Culahlon,s T is 3 Me�'i. ures Cst)L.D M PMD03 � • Spwd Cushions illedian Striping civ Nj ° a a. r l yt, �m O a, � !r/r it 1t+5 1 f M1 Ni/i (,'Y ■ Extension Striping With Texas C1O06 SYCAMORE CANYON PARK Ste atNono ion view O Rio Loboa Rd '•� Thunder Tr. Golden Prados Dr East of Hopi St AREA Before Volume Eastbound n/a Westbound n/a Fall 06 Volume 882 966 Difference n/a n/a Winter 07 Volume 855 917 Difference 06-07 n/a n/a Before 85th % Speed n/a nla Fall 06 85th % Speed 35 35 Difference n/a n/a Winter 07 86th % Speed 36 37 Difference 06-07 n/a n/a Golden Prados Dr West of Bridle Dr Eastbound n/a Westbound n/a 226 218 n/a n/a 252 297 n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 29 n/a n/a 30 29 n/a n/a Golden Prados Dr West of Ritter St Eastbound nla Westbound Na 811 933 n/a n/a 776 850 n/a n/a n/a nla 29 28 n/a n/a 28 28 n/a n/a Jubilee Ln Just north of Charmingdale Rd Northbound 211 Southbound 163 170 174 -41 11 135 225 -76 62 34 32 25 24 -9 -8 23 26 -11 -7 Jublilee Ln South of Rancheria Rd Northbound 211 Southbound 163 201 200 -10 37 164 198 -47 35 34 32 22 23 -12 -9 22 24 -12 -8 Rancheria Rd Between Alada Dr and Via Rancho Dr Eastbound 451 Westbound 401 331 336 -120 -65 323 328 -128 -73 38 39 33 35 -5 -4 34 36 -4 -3 x��a u,10h'[7Q DLLtiIOND BAR Al City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Staff is recommending the removal of the two (2) traffic circles that were installed in the Rancheria Neighborhood on Rancheria Road. Staff is recommending the removal of the Texas dots that were installed on Golden Prados Drive at Hopi Street. �r Staff is recommending the removal of the Texas dots that were installed on Fountain Springs. iw Staff is recommending the removal of some of the Texas dots that were installed on Maple Hill Road that prevent adequate ingress and egress of the Maple Hill Elementary and Maple Hill Park driveways. Add additional advisory speed signage at various locations of the speed cushions. Evaluate and consider the reduction of speed cushions along Sunset Crossing. Staff will continue to work with the community to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the remaining pilot program tools that were installed. The Sheriff's Department will also be working with us to monitor the traffic operations in these areas to ensure motorist compliance with all traffic regulations. City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Section 1.4.1 of the Manual/Guidelines shall be changed as follows: Bullet one will now read: The City receives a written request to mitigate a traffic concern by a petition of 51% of the households on the affected street(s). Bullet three will now read: A meeting for the residents along the affected street(s) will be held to discuss their concerns and gather first-hand information. City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program It is staff's recommendation to make the modifications to the existing NTMP Pilot Project areas and continue to monitor the program over the next five months at which time additional speed and volume data will be collected in July of 2007. Once a thorough engineering analysis is completed, staff will return to Council with a final report of the Pilot Projects. City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Receive and file the presentation by staff, approve modifications to specific areas as identified, direct staff to continue engineering evaluation of Pilot Projects, and approve modifications to the NTMP Manual/Guidelines. City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (Pecs I vc. CA ' 0 7 8`, -'I�. n RANCHERIA and CASA LOMA/JUBILEE RD GO-AROUNDS Rancheria has two (2) Texas Dot go-arounds; the first is at the 3 -way intersection with Casa Loma and the second is at the 4 -way intersection of Jubilee. The go-arounds were established by the Traffic Management Board as a means by which to a) minimize traffic cutting through the neighborhood from either Golden Springs Road or Goldrush (Diamond Bar Blvd.), and b) to slow "speeding" drivers as they utilize Rancharia Rd. Safety Concern(s)/Problems: 1. Consultant/Diamond Bar Engineering Statistical Data: The data as tabulated does not provide a clear representation of the neighborhood opinions and it is misleading. This applies not only to the Rancheria Neighborhood data, but also every other Neighborhood project's data. The Engineering data only provides a "majority % value" which, as calculated, only provides a conclusion as to whether or not the neighborhood wants the project to continue. The data should have been calculated to provide the most reflective information, so that an informed decision could be made. Specifically, it should have been as follows: YES NO a) The devices implemented on my street are effective: 11 (180/.) 51(82%) b) I like the specific traffic calming tool that was installed: 11(18%) 51 (82%) *If yes, would you like to see this tool permanently installed? 9 (15%) 0(0%) **If no, would you like to see a different tool installed? 30(51%) 20(34%) c) Do you want the program to continue on your street? 22(36%) 39(64%) Conclusion: The Texas Dot go -grounds are not effective, nor are they the tool of choice for 82% of our neighborhood. 51% of the neighborhood would like to see a different tool installed versus 34% who want no tool installed. However, at the same time, the majority of people (64%) do not want the program to continue on the street. 2. Traffic Flow/Sneed Data: The data that was collected for this analysis was taken within a week or so after the go-arounds were installed. People utilizing Rancheria didn't understand the go-arounds and many others were very upset with this installation. Needless to say, during this timeframe the vehicles in the neighborhood were slowed down, but not necessarily as a result of any efficiency that was provided by the go-arounds. I believe it was more due to the fact that the go-arounds were confusing and or upsetting. Diamond Bar's Engineering group could not provide me with the exact date that this information was collected. If the data was collected over Thanksgiving (when school was out and many families had taken vacation, and or working professionals were not going to work, etc.) the traffic dynamics of our neighborhood would be very different, as there would not be as many vehicles going through the neighborhood. Conclusion: The data collected does not reflect the typical traffic characteristics of the neighborhood, so as to make an informed decision. 3. At the Open House, the Police enforcement policy of the Texas Dots was discussed with one of the Police officers. We stated that when we pull our trailer, there is no way that we can maneuver the go-arounds and stay within the markings. We also stated that because of the size of our truck (even without the trailer) we at times go over the Texas Dots. Can we get a ticket for this? The officers' comment was NO. Conclusion: If the Texas Dots are not enforceable by the Police department what purpose do they serve? It is only a matter of time before everyone in the neighborhood realizes this and does not follow them at all. 4. At the Open House meeting it was stated that actual cement islands with decorative plants might replace the Texas Dots. I called the fire department to determine whether or not Diamond Bar's emergency vehicles (fire trucks) could access our neighborhood if permanent cement islands were positioned on Rancheria. My conversation with Captain Rogers of the 121" Fire Station was: if a cement island was erected on Rancharia at either or both of these locations the fire trucks would not be able to access our neighborhood from Rancharia. His statement was that even now, with the Texas Dots in place, the fire trucks must drive right over the Texas Dots; they do not go around the go-arounds. Conclusion: Our neighborhood would only be accessible by emergency vehicles (fire trucks) from Gold Rush, which means a longer lead-time in response to an emergency call since the vehicle would have to travel further and through an additional very busy intersection (Diamond Bar Blvd and Golden Springs). Additionally, it also leaves several streets in our neighborhood with ZERO access by fire trucks, because these streets can only be accessed through use of Rancheria. 5. The design of the go -around, specifically, at the corner of Rancharia and Casa Loma creates additional safety problems. Please realize that this is a 3 -way intersection, not a 4 -way intersection and on the fourth side is a telephone pole and telephone distribution box. • Due to the large size of the central island there is not much, if any, of a buffer zone between the vehicle and the telephone pole (assuming the vehicle stays within the markings of the go -around) when turning left onto Rancharia from Casa Loma. Most larger vehicles cross over the Texas Dots to assure that they do not hit the telephone pole. This includes larger trucks, e.g. UPS, FEDEX, etc. • Please also note, that the telephone company personnel who need to utilize this telephone distribution panel park directly in the go -around and block off the entire descending portion of the go -around although the curb is painted red. • A vehicle entering Rancharia from Casa Loma does not have clear visibility of uphill (descending) traffic because 1) the yellow yield line on the ground sets back further than a traditional stop sign would, so as to allow for the large center circle of the go -around and 2) the topographics of the adjacent area is a small landscaped hill. Thus, as a vehicle enters from Casa Loma the driver must pull into the intersection to obtain a clear view of potential descending N (uphill) traffic, thereby placing the vehicle and passenger(s) in the direct flow of the go -around and possibly downhill traffic. • Speeding vehicles typically occur when descending a hill, not ascending a hill. However, the design of the go-arounds only minimally, at best, addresses the downhill speeding on Rancharia. Downhill hill traffic has almost a straight path down Rancheria, and no obscured lines of site. Uphill traffic, however, must physically maneuver around the circle and is therefore slowed down substantially. • Drivers descending Rancharia still perceive that they have the right away at the intersection because they are continuing in a straight line while everyone else is turning into the go -around. (In a typical go -around, all vehicles are turning into the go -around and thus have the same responsibility/concerns for other traffic however, that is not the case in this 3 - way go -around design). 6. Failure to consider the rest of the neighborhood: The Traffic Management Board has failed to consider the ramifications of their decision(s) on the rest of the neighborhood when selecting what "calming tools" to use in our neighborhood. While vehicle flow may have been decreased on Jubilee and Rancheria the vehicle flow on the parallel streets has increased, specifically, Casa Loma and Charmingdale. Conclusion: If the initial problem (speeding and traffic cutting through the neighborhood) has only been moved to the parallel streets what if any positive effect have these "calming tools" had on our neighborhood? Summary: The Rancheria neighborhood does not want the Texas dot go-arounds and if they are made more restrictive to traffic (cement islands) leaves our neighborhood unprotected in the event of a fire, etc. Because of the design of the go-arounds additional safety issues have been added to our neighborhood that did not exist before this project was implemented. Additionally, the go-arounds aren't going to be enforced by the Police department and now there is increased speeding and use of the parallel streets (Casa Loma and Charmingdale). 3 Agenda # Meeting Date: M. 2/6/07 CITY COUNCIL 4, ;h ` u ° �` AGENDA REPC7RT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Manaer` TITLE: Consideration of Batting Cages at eterson and Pantera Parks RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the plan to construct batting cages at both Peterson and Pantera Parks as a single construction project. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends approval of the plan to construct batting cages at Peterson Park only at this time. The Commission further recommends evaluating the use of the batting cages at Peterson Park after they are constructed and to consider constructing batting cages at Pantera Park after the evaluation of the Peterson Park batting cages is complete. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Estimated cost for two batting cages at: Peterson Park: $66,846 Pantera Park: 165,823 Total estimated cost (if constructed as a single project): $132,669* Amount appropriated in 2006107 FY budget for this project: $149,650 * Staff estimates it will cost about 5% more (+1- $6,600) to split the two parks into two separate construction projects. BACKGROUND: In early 2004, City Council, city staff, and local sports organizations met several times to discuss the needs of the various sports organizations and to create ideas where new park space could be acquired for sports facilities and to determine methods to make the use of the City's limited athletic field space more efficient. While additional park space has not been acquired, the task force did recognize the need for precise scheduling and maximizing use of field space. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended research into batting cages to, allow fields to be used for other activities, rather than batting practice. This would allow youth baseball and softball players to maximize their limited time on City fields. After visiting Peterson and Pantera Parks with Landscape Architects Jeff Scott and Liz Del Turco from David Evans and Associates, it was determined that both these locations would provide excellent opportunities for quality batting cages. A conceptual plan for the batting cages was developed and the plan was presented at public meetings conducted for the Peterson Park and Pantera Park neighborhoods. The meeting at Pantera Park was held on Thursday, October 19, 2006 in the Pantera Park Activity Room beginning at 6:30 pm. Notices were mailed to 148 addresses located within 1000 feet of Pantera Park. Fifteen residents attended the meeting and there were speakers both in favor and against the project. Those in favor of the project expressed that the batting cages would make for a more efficient use of the park space by allowing soccer teams to practice in the outfield grass while Girls Softball and Little League teams could practice on the infield, with batting practice taking place in the batting cages. Those in favor also said the batting cages would make batting practice safer by preventing foul balls from leaving the playing field. Those against the batting cages were concerned the batting cages would disturb nearby residents, park visitors and the wildlife in the natural areas adjacent to the park and interfere with the beauty of the park. One of the people against the batting cages collected 338 signatures in a petition requesting the City to find a more suitable site. The petition was presented to the City Council at their meeting on November 21, 2006. In an effort to respond to the concerns expressed, staff organized a simulated batting cage demonstration that was conducted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 at 6:30 to 7:30pm at Pantera Park. Notices of the batting cage simulation were mailed to 148 addresses located within 1000 feet of Pantera Park. Twelve people attended the simulation. Two noise meters were used by staff to measure the decibel levels that resulted from the batting practice simulation. The highest decibel readings recorded at the perimeter of the park was 55. The ambient decibel level at the same locations was 50; and for comparison, a passing car recorded a decibel level of 70. Please see the attached graphic of Pantera Park showing decibel levels that were recorded. The meeting for the Peterson Park neighborhood was held on Monday, October 23 at Diamond Point Elementary School beginning at 6:30 pm. Notices were mailed to 209 addresses located within 1000 feet of Peterson Park. Seven people attended the meeting and several spoke in favor of batting cages at Peterson Park and none were against it. There was no batting cage simulation conducted at Peterson Park, but staff did record ambient decibel levels at the park on December 13, 2006. Ambient level at the west driveway to Peterson Park was 60, and the ambient level at the east driveway was 55. The Parks and Recreation Commission considered the batting cages for Peterson and Pantera Parks at their regular meeting on January 25, 2007. Notices were mailed to 357 addresses located within 1000 feet of Peterson and Pantera Parks. Three members of the public spoke at the Commission meeting. Two spoke in favor of batting cages at both Peterson and Pantera Parks and the other speaker questioned the need and the cost for batting cages at Pantera Park. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted to recommend to the City Council the construction of the batting cages at Peterson Park. The Commission then voted to recommend to the City Council that the construction of batting cages be delayed at Pantera Park until after the batting cages at Peterson Park have been constructed and a review of the use of the Peterson Park batting cages was completed. The purpose of the review is to: 1) Determine the use pattern of the batting cages 2) Visualize how the batting cages might look at Pantera Park based on the look of Peterson Park 3) Determine if there are lighting issues or any safety issues 4) Provide time to develop and refine a use policy for the batting cages. The majority of the Commission did make it clear they do not oppose the eventual construction of batting cages at Pantera Park. DISCUSSION; Staff proposes to construct two batting cages at two park sites, Peterson and Pantera Parks, as a single construction project. The batting cages at Peterson Park would be located in a single structure on the first base side of the ball field near Golden, Springs Drive. The batting cages at Pantera Park would be located in a single structure on the third base side of the ball field near Bowcreek Drive. Please see the attached park graphics that show the proposed location at each park. Per the attached batting cage schematic, the two batting cages at each park will be side-by-side, enclosed with chain link on all sides and flat over the top. The surface material will be decomposed granite. Pitching machines will be provided by the user groups utilizing the batting cages. Electrical access will be available in each batting cage. Lighting will come from the ball field lights already installed at each park. Staff believes the batting cages should be constructed at each park as a single construction project. There is an economy of scale that staff estimates should realize about a 5% savings (fl- $6,600) over splitting the two parks into two separate construction projects. Notices have been mailed to the residents in the Peterson and Pantera Park neighborhoods notifying them of this agenda item on the February 6, 2007 City Council meeting agenda. Prepared 4,n eviewed By: Bob `lose Director of Community Services Attachments: Peterson Park Graphic — Proposed Location of Batting Cages Pantera Park Graphic — Proposed Location of Batting Cages Estimated Cost for Peterson Park Batting Cages Estimated Cost for Pantera Park Batting Cages Pantera Park Graphic — Decibel Levels at 12/14/06 Batting Cage Simulation Batting Cage Schematic — View from Above Batting Cage Schematic — Side View Batting Cage Schematic — End View 3 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Page 1 of 1 City of Diamond Bar PETERSON PARK Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Uptiated. February 01, 2007 ITEMS - PARK SITE (ONLY) QTY UNIT UNIT COST SUBTOTAL BASE COST EXTENSION OF EXTENSION BASE COST TOTALS MOBILIZATION 1 Contractors Mobilization (Including permts and temporary services) - Assume 2% of Budget +/- 1 Allow 2% $ 1,304.08 2 Temporary Construction Fenclng 250 LF $ 1.35 $ 337.50 Sub -Total 1 1,641.58 GRADING and EARTHWORK 3 Site Gradin Ex ort 18 CY $ 32.00 $ 576.00 Sub -Total $ 576.00 DEMOLITION 4 Turf Removal 2,058 SF $ 1.30 $ 2,675.40 5 Relocate Catch Basin i FA $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Sub -Total $ 5,675.40 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 6 4" D.G. for Baling Cage 1,530 SF $ 4.50 $ 6,885.00 7 6" Mowcurh Q Batting Cage 148 LF $ 8.50 $ 1,258.00 8 4" Concrete Walkway ! Staging Area 825 SF S 8.50 $ 7,012.50 Sub -Total $ 15,155.50 CHAINLINK FENCING 9 6' Entry Gates 2 EA $ 291.00 $ 582.00 16 2x8 Redwood Backboard 48" High Mounted on Inside of Cage w/ Rubber Padding 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 11 4000 Twine DuPont Netting 4,920 5F S 2.00 $ 9,840.00 12 12' Hi h Chain Link Fence Sides 245 LF $ 65.00 $ 15,925.00 13 24" Wide Chain Link Fence Roof 1,530 SF $ 5.00 $ 7,650.00 Sub -Total $ 36,997,00 UTILITIES AND LIGHTING 14 Electrical Outlet for Batting Machine 1 EA $ 350.00 $ 350.00 15 l" Electrical Conduit 230 LF $ 15.00 $ 3,450.00 Sub -Total $ 3,800.00 PLANTING and IRRIGATION 17 Soil Prep, Fine Grading, and Sad 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 18 Turf 1 LS $ 1,500.00 S 1,500.00 Sub -Total $ 3,000.00 PARK SITE TOTAL $ 66,845.48 5% CONTINGENCY 1 $ 3,342.27 GRAND TOTAL 1 $ 70,187.75 ITEMS - PARK SITE (ONLY) ADD ALTERNATES QTY UNIT UNIT COST SUBTOTAL BASE COST EXTENSION OF EXTENSION BASE COST TOTALS ARCHITECTURE 19 Shade Structures 2640 Steel Structure 1 EA $ 90,000.00 $ 90,000.00 20 Shade Structures 26x60 Fabric Structure 1 EA S 30TOOO.00 $ Xon0,06 21 Batting Cage Lights 1 LS $ 3,601.00 $ 3,601.00 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 22 4" Concrete Paving for Batting Cage 1,530 SF $ 6.50 $ 13,005.00 23 4" Thick Concrete Home Plate (colored concrete) with Schofield Lithocrete Color Hardener 3 SF $ 12.00 $ 36.00 24 9" Thick Cana, Batter's Bax Colored Concrete wl Sol LithocreteColor Hard ner. 96 SF $ 12.00 $ 1,152,00 SPORTS EOUIPTMENT 25 Pitch[ng Machine 2 F4 $ 2,500.00 1 $ 5,000.00 Page 1 of 1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Page 1 of 1 City of Diamond Bar PANTERA PARK Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Updated; February 01, 2007 ITEMS - PARK SITE •NLY) QTY UNIT UNITCOST SUBTOTAL• BASE COST OF • BASECOSTTOTALS MOBILIZATION 1 Contractors Mobilization (Including permits and temporary services) - Assume 2% of Budget 1 Allow 2% $ 1,284.02 2 Temporary Construction Fencing 250 LF $ 1.35 $ 337.50 Sub -Total $ 1,621.52 GRADING and EARTHWORK 3 Site Grading 1 Export 18 CY $ 32.00 $ 576.00 Sub -Total $ 576.00 DEMOLITION 4 Turf Removal 1,530 SF $ 1.30 $ 1,989.00 5 Relocate Catch Basin 2 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 6 Relocate Walkway Light Pole 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Sub -Total $ 10,489.00 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 4" D.G. for Batting Cage 1,530 SF $ 4.50 $ 6,885.00 7 6" Mowcurb @ Batting Cage 74 LF $ 8.50 $ 629.00 Sub -Total $ 7,514.00 WALLS AND FENCES 8 1 18" High Wall at Perimeter Fenco 85 LF $ 40.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 3,400.00 CHAINLINK FENCING 9 6' Entry Gates 2 EA $ 291.00 $ 582.00 10 2x8 Redwood Backboard 48" High Mounted on Inside of Cage wl Rubber Padding 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 11 4000 Twine DuPont Netting 4,920 SF $ 2.00 $ 9,840.00 12 12' High Chain Link Fence Sides 2451 LF $ 65.00 $ 15,925.00 13 1 24" Wide Chain Link Fence Roof 1,530 SF $ 5.00 $ 7,650.00 Sub -Total $ 36,997.00 UTILITIES AND LIGHTING 14 1" Electrical Conduit 125 LF $ 15.00 $ 1,875.00 15 Electrical Outlet for Batting Machine 1 EA $ 350.00 $ 350.00 Sub -Total 1 $ 2,225.00 PLANTING and IRRIGATION 16 Soil Prep, Fine Grading, and Sod 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 17 Turf 1 LS $ 1,500,00 $ 1,500.00 Sub -Total $ 3,000.00 PARK SITE TOTAL $ 65,822.52 5% CONTINGENCY $ 3,291.13 ITEMS - PARK SITE • • l ■ ALTERNATES ARCHITECTURE QTY UNIT UNITCOST- GRAND TOTAL • BASE COST $ 99,113.65 • OF • BASE COSTTOTALS 18 Shade Structures 26x60 Steel Shelter 1 EA $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000,00 19 Shade Structures 26x60 Fabric Shelter 1 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 20 Batting Cage Lights 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 PAVING and SURFACE MATERIAL 21 4" Concrete Paving for Batting Cage 1,530 SF $ 8.50 $ 13,005.00 22 4" Thick Concrete Home Plate (colored concrete) with Schofield Lithocrete Calor Hardener 1 31 SF 1 $ 12.00 1 $ 36.00 23 9" Thick Cone, Batter's Box Colored Concrete w/ Schofield Lithocrete Color Hardner, 1 96 SF 1 $ 12.00 $ 1,152.00 SPORTS EQUIPTMENT 24 Pitching Machine 1 21 EA 1 $ 2,500.00 1 $ 5,000.00 Page 1 of 1 z LLI 0 � Z �� � W O U U r: Q V (j o U Fes- a 3 z J� �CO o a c� ¢0 ��o• oay t7o WU a�aW U1= Z UV O W �� OU ©N �� w0 LL. CL W ZZ W Z U¢ Eo. Z06 O�W2 �i � SZWzW JO aL� V7 LY_ 00 Q (f1 � CL F- W U � J Q zi W U00 a3 � •rO-I r-^, M1 o-=ivll4itlti3;Ft.;i - O 50 a .J Z r �m� LLIo V] a 0 wo g I xn;' :�yppE I Y z� CL :z sept z ©UJ CO 0 � U) _ w zu-I 0 I af LLI _ 14 LU _ z �� W w a W "•• ' '�' : E;' 1 LSI . LU Q o LUo MJ o •W I. m �:'l�J w 0UOOpU OU m OQm O0UW U U W rl to oO 1 Li �' :, �..' r ��f�•..s' OI - :,� I (lUa' L=LQ 4o-' rQG , T O Q ZOO ^� .� O E't W F- e HOS sOj� I •:� 11 J U Li d V Q �✓ �, _ - U Q O O .mss x w �a. l Z r O LJ s W O O �WU �../ O p� s OW Z �ZL " ,Z6CI �0WO LLI O O¢ D (j = m om Li00 m O 3 ¢00 � U W N �rz SII W Om �J LL -V F^MM Y G m U O 9 F� x me ma cr (71 )pcl Lsl Z C 7 LLI V) }z Q ZU w aw Z0. _ w Oa � M 77 ME 0 LU 'fie N Z H rco0 to '010 A .d W� N d] G �+ Fq 2 M IL04 p Y ' 0 'o m 3x0- o O f s ry z r� n Q x + m 0 4N 0:5 0 p. C a< %t U U m o N W 1A17 £ 2 to CL04 p N .NLLJ 00 �.... �£ � 3 a. LL oC44IX ' II a N N} Lo W V 1 U vii En U � p U O CO UO Lil ~ LL- U Y LL Z � j J 0- z V) z z w U a_ H ` z (V o d � Zuj i�? ,i Z gra p a z -J (t) �F-z z�� ani ;. Z U N o A € p C • >YW v U LSI X07 +s c d J 0 Q U W 0 Z= Z= Z .s 0 ¢Z 0) in J �¢ I ii Fr� QW w ED< cL a vi Op N r ri UO d' 0 'zU � �OL_ LJF=-- LFi—i O.<C, WFC-., Lsl Z� LLJ0800 Z�.� L,,JW WQ o �CL Z�u 1—UV m D UQ C) 00 V]Z� 00 U�� �i� Z EL(!} U� O0 U W LL.CLCX�l �d �� �T� TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK +'Cij'�1, l �. i� 14`,`' ; t PHONE: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: 0, �� F� � �� � �=� DATE: 9— /a ADDRESS: �� 'l "� �\ t t�� PHONE: e1 X1-1 ORGANIZATION: \A�I r v, AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect rr name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: k) 15 4 i t A LA L_ ADDRESS: DATE: 2 U+ PHONE: C� � )8(0/-/Jy( ORGANIZATION: ki L-46(�Y�j n c��4-,n AGENDA #/SUBJECT: PI i..o`T N -T M. f) - 7LAB(<—'­C—, L,�,c-C" Ww: 'VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL r- 'TO: CITY CLERK FROM: / s-; DATE: s,%r'� ; ADDRESS: PHONEL�-; ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLONTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ^ TO: CITY CLERK FROM: CJe,tfir.S DATE: 0-7 ADDRESS: ' -.•`? �� 1Je PHONE: 1961 - l 3 ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT:�� I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: L )�L� PL (Z-2 DATE: C /C() 7 ADDRESS: /� D4.6 Griar PHONE: fIf--f'54�A-2/f ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: TCG ldo s s��r�i� Z OZO I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect m) name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: �l to v r ,c44- DATE: cC. q ' s ADDRESS: PHONE: `%� r?, i' ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: ` I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature;-- f¢ VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL r -TO: CITY CLERK FROM: V((/y'a�t` DATE:2_ ADDRESS: I',f PHONE: J ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. i� TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL Z AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK i �i cin C' ea) DATE: PHONE: - ra�•6-2Zq I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. �Ir,c�✓iA.kl�,�.,�1 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. l r - Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL r :J-�� TO: CITY CLERK FROM: ) C /`:e L DATE: ADDRESS: Z/ %�� <. � t PHONE: Z,�G 02,Z�' ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT:a.7;� , I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. r r Signature