Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/4/2006Tuesday April 4, 2006 5:00 p.m. — Closed Session CC -8 5:30 p.m. — Study Session CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting The Government Center South Coast Air Quality Management District/ Main Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mayor Carol Herrera Mayor Pro Tem Bob Zirbes Council Member Wen Chang Council Member Jack Tanaka Council Member Steve Tye City Manager Linda C. Lowry City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meetino_ Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers, The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES Welcome to the meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. Meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public and are cablecast live on Channel 3. You are invited to attend and participate. PUBLIC INPUT Members of the public may address the Council on any item of business on the agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Council. In addition, members of the public may, during the Public Comment period, address the Council on any consent calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and within the Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Persons wishing to speak should submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk. Any material to be submitted to the City Council at the meeting should be submitted through the City Clerk. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Mayor determines otherwise. The Mayor may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and any other relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Council only once on an agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicantlappellant may be afforded a rebuttal. Public comments must be directed to the City Council. Behavior that disrupts the orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the Council chambers. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for regular City Council meetings are available 72 hours prior to the meeting and are posted in the City's regular posting locations, on DBTV Channel 3, and on the City's website at www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us. A full agenda packet is available for review during the meeting, in the foyer just outside the Council chambers. The City Council may take action on any item listed on the agenda. ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE DISABLED A cordless microphone is available for those persons with access the podium in order to make a public comment. available by providing the City Clerk three business days Please telephone (909) 839-7000 between 7:30 a.m. Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Fridays. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS mobility impairments who cannot Sign language interpretation is ' notice in advance of a meeting. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Copies of agendas, rules of the Council, CassetteNideo tapes of meetings: (909) 839-7010 Computer access to agendas: www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us General information: (909) 839-7000 THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY ADELPHIA FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 3 AND BY REMAINING 1N THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS MEETING WILL BE RE -BROADCAST EVERY SATURDAY AT 9:00 A.M. AND EVERY TUESDAY AT 8:00 P.M. ON CHANNEL 3. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 4, 2006 Next Resolution No. 2006-26 Next Ordinance No. 04(2006) CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 p.m., Room CC -8 Public Comments on Closed Session Agenda ► Government Code Section 54956.8 — Conference with Real Property Negotiators (1) Property Negotiations: Address: Portion of Lot 13, Tract No. 3941 and Portion of Lot 3, Tract No. 3941 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Negotiating Party: Robert R. Reed f=amily Trust (2) Property Negotiations: Address: Portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 1479, and Lot 61, Tract No. 42557 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Negotiating Party: D & L Properties, Inc. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms of Payment STUDY SESSION: 5:30 p.m., Room CC -8 ► City Council Goals and Objectives No. Discussion of Placing Military Banners on Streets Public Comments CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: 6:30 p.m. Mayor Monsignor James Loughnane St. Denis Catholic Church APRIL 4, 2006 PAGE 2 ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Tanaka, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Zirbes, Mayor Herrera APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the DB 4 Youth "In Action" Logo Winners; First Place winner Benjamin Berk from Diamond Ranch High School; and, Second Place Winner Charmaine Platon from Diamond Bar High School. 1.2 Proclaiming April, 2006 as "Sexual Assault Awareness Month" designating April 19, 2006 as "Denim Day". 1.3. Proclamation April, 2006 as "National Donate Life Month" by registering to donate organs and tissue. 1.4 Proclaiming April 2-8, 2006 as "National Library Week — Change your World @ your Library". 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 Presentation by Clifford M. Johnson, Executive Director of Institute of Youth, Education and Families re: Youth Master Planning Process. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please com lete a Speakers Card and giveit to the Citki Clerk com Dletion of this form is volunta . There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressingthe Cit Council. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may br_ iefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Arbor Day Celebration — April 7, 2006 — 9:00 a.m., Pantera Elementary School, 801 Pantera Dr. 5.2 City's 17th Birthday Celebration — April 9, 2006 — 12:00 — 6:00 p.m., Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Dr. APRIL 4, 2006 PAGE 3 5.3 Planning Commission Meeting — April 11 2006 — 7:00 AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. P.m., Auditorium, 5.4 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — April 13, 2006 — 7:00 p.m., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.5 Easter Egg Hunt — April 15, 2006 — 10:00 a.m., Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Dr. 5.6 City Council Meeting — April 18, 2006 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.7 Public Scoping Meeting for Design Planning of Lemon Ave. On -Off Ramp, April 20, 2006 — 6:30 - 8:30 p.m., Room CC -6, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes: 6.1 .1 Study Session of March 21, 2006 — Approve as submitted. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of March 21, 2006 — Approve as submitted. 6.2 Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 28, 2006 - Receive and file. 6.3 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes — Regular Meeting of February 23, 2006 — Receive and file. 6.4 Ratification of Check Register — Ratify Check Register containing checks dated March 23 through March 30, 2006 in and amount totaling $1,017,835.36. 6.5 Treasurer's Statement - month of February, 2006 Recommended Action: Review and approve. Requested by: Finance Division 6.6 Approve Appropriation of $43,901 from the General Fund Reserves and Ratify the Award of a Contract to Erosion Control Specialists (ECS) for Nuisance Abatement Mitigation Measures (Temporary Weatherization) of the Sunset Crossing/Minnequa Landslide in the Amount of $39,901 and a Contingency Amount of $4,000 for Change Orders to be Approved by the City Manager for a Total Authorization Amount of $43,901. APRIL 4, 2006 PAGE 4 Recommended Action: Appropriate and Award. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.7 Adopt Resolution No. 2006 -XX: Approving the Program Supplement Agreement No. 004-M to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5455 for Federal Funds to be Utilized for the Construction of the Grand Avenue Improvements Project - Phase Il. Recommended Action: Adopt. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.8 Approval of Legislative Sub -Committee Recommendations: (a) AB 2696 (Huff) Sponsored by the City. Classifies use of non - motorized or electric scooters as a hazardous recreational activity, and lower the age limit from 14 to 10 years. The bill would help to limit the liability of cities that allow the use of scooters in public skate parks. Recommended Action: Support. (b) SB 1407 (Margett) Like AB 2696 (Huff), this bill would also add the use of non -motorized scooters to the list of hazardous recreational activities. This will help limit the liability of agencies that allow the use of scooters in public skate parks. Recommended Action: Support. (c) SB 411 (Alarcon) Eliminates Existing Diversion Credits Given to Source Separated Greenwaste Alternative Daily Cover, Used as a Cover for Landfills. It will Become More Difficult for Agencies to Meet the State Mandated 50% Waste Reduction Standard. Recommended Action: Oppose. (d) SCA 20 (McClintock) Limits Eminent Domain to Properties that will Serve a Public Use. Any Proceeding that is Designed for Economic Development Use Would Require the Consent of the Property Owner Before Condemnation. Would Severely Impact Redevelopment and Economic Development Efforts. Recommended Action: Oppose. APRIL 4, 2006 PAGE 5 (e) SB 1210 (Torlakson) Revise State Law to State that Emineni Domain Does Not Fit Public Use When Transferred to a Non. Governmental Entity for Purposes of Economic Development or an Attempt to Increase Tax Revenue. Limits the Options of Cities to Purse Beneficial Redevelopment of Economic Development Opportunities. Recommended Action: Oppose. (f) Proposition 81 (The Library Bond of 2006) Californians for Literacy & Community Libraries, has Requested Support for the 2006 Library Bond Initiative, Which will be on the Ballot for the Voters in June, 2006. The Initiative would Authorize sale of $6000 Million in Bonds, and would Benefit Cities and Districts Throughout the State that Wish to Apply for Funds to Construct or Improve their Libraries. Recommended Action: Support. Requested by: Legislative Sub -Committee 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Ci ouncil From: Dave Doyle, Assistant City Manager., - Date: March 31, 2006 Re: 2006-2007 Goals & Objectives At the direction of the Mayor, the Council was asked to review the 2005-2006 Goals & Objectives and make recommendations for addition and deletion. Each Council Member then provided staff with their recommendations. The following matrix organizes the results. The 2005-2006 results are also included for your convenience. To aid in the process of selecting which items will be added and removed, please vote "yes" or "no" in the box provided next to each prospective item. Once the worksheets have been completed, a final tally will be provided. At the Study Session, Council can discuss the proposed additions and deletions from the list. f=ollowing the discussion, staff will create the final Goals & Objectives list for Council to prioritize. r City of Diamond Bar Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Ci ouncil From: Dave Doyle, Assistant City Manager., - Date: March 31, 2006 Re: 2006-2007 Goals & Objectives At the direction of the Mayor, the Council was asked to review the 2005-2006 Goals & Objectives and make recommendations for addition and deletion. Each Council Member then provided staff with their recommendations. The following matrix organizes the results. The 2005-2006 results are also included for your convenience. To aid in the process of selecting which items will be added and removed, please vote "yes" or "no" in the box provided next to each prospective item. Once the worksheets have been completed, a final tally will be provided. At the Study Session, Council can discuss the proposed additions and deletions from the list. f=ollowing the discussion, staff will create the final Goals & Objectives list for Council to prioritize. 2006-2007 GOALS & OBJECTIVES ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR ADDITION Create Four Corners Task Force to fix 57160 Interchange Pursue library bond application for 2006 Work with Charles Co./Arman Gabay to get more high volume retailer to replace K -Mart Modify City's website to include all retail centers with of list of each business/retailer located there so that residents know what businesses are located in DB Complete signal interconnect project and get the digital synchronization system up and rennin Develop a tree replacement program for major streets (DB Blvd., Pathfinder, Golden Springs, Grand, etc.). Break the City up into 5-10 zones, and each year, remove the pine and eucalyptus trees and replace with nicer Develop K-Mart/Jolly Bagel/Medical Center block Park at west end of Golden S rin s and Calbourne City of Industry property at the end of Calbourne against the freeway Yes No ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR REMOVAL Wall improvements on the north (approx. $500k) and south (approx. $450k) sides of Pathfinder Rd. from the 57 Freeway easterly provided that we receive some funding. Look into cost effective City medical coverage Enhance scope of DBTV Channel 3 to include new programming and the development of a DBTV internship for local high school and college students. Hire an economic develo ment consultant Push for the conversion of Kmart to a store that would bring higher income tax revenue, such as a Sears Essential. Yes No Establish a supermarket in south DB and work with developer to attract Yes No businesses that will ensure a minimum of $150k -$200k in sales tax revenue Computerized Signal Management System run by City, not interconnect master plan) Pursue purchase of Lots 1 & 61, (Preserve Windmill located at the Ralph's Shopping Center by dedicating it as a historical landmark and uirsuing ownershi . City Council and Staff visionin . Expand sphere of influence to incorporate properties west and southwest of the city by creating a pre -annexation agreement for the Shell Oil Property and by establishing contiguous neighborhoods within City ZIP Code and WVUSD by annexing two existing housing tracts Establish contiguous neighborhoods within City ZIP code. 2005-2006 GOALS Economic Development Strategy; Create and implement a plan using economic development funds to secure long term revenue sources for the future of the City. Spell out the City's Economic Development Plan in 1, 5, and 10 year increments, and market the plan to the community so that the Develop a D amic Center Evaluate Site D and work with owner to build a minimum of 50% commercial development Create and implement business to business marketing program. Include questions about what retailers/stores/chains that residents want in Diamond Bar on new Citizen Satsfaction survey, Create strategic plan for creating a high quality commercial activity center for long term revenue source for City at the DB Golf Course. Trans ortation Issues: Continue to pursue 57/60 long term fix Continue to pursue TonnerhCanyon on b Monitor and participate intass road Lemon Avenue offram rs ' Maintain opposition to 60 Freeway truck only lane (unless as partof "final fix) Support ACE funding requests and construction of nearby rail grade crossing Droiects Other Issues: Create a Strategy to build a library if State grant funding fails. Monitor and evaluate proposals for development in areas such as Tres Hermanos, Tonner Cyn., and the Shell Oil property. Pursue and promote joint development/use of facilities, parks, and open space with PUSD & WVUSD. Obtain Lark stone Parkagreement Implement Larkstone Park project (a portion of the park could be used as a natural "laboratory" for local schools colleges, & universities). Establish a fund for current library enhancements_ Implement Trails Master Pian focusing on areas around the new Diamond Bar Center. Establish semi-annual Town Forums for citizens to discuss issues of concern including a Goal Setting Forum. Establishment of City Public Works yard for equipment storage. Master Sign Program within shopping areas. Follow up with recommendations from the Youth Master Plan when completed. Review parking ordinances (including oversized commercial vehicles, RV parking, and vehicles exceeding 8000 pounds) from both LA County and surrounding cities, and develop a similar ordinance for the City to promote safety and maintain property values. Provide a conceptual outline (cost/benefit analysis) for the delivery of wireless internet service to the community. Study Session #2 City Council Study Session April 4, 2006 Proposed Military Banner Pro ram Note — This program proposal was developed after reviewing similar programs in the cities of San Dimas, Rancho Cucamonga, Walnut, Monrovia, Glendora and Covina. The military banner program is a method for the City of Diamond Bar to honor residents and the family members of residents who are serving this country in the military. The purpose of this program is to honor the soldiers, not to make a political statement about war. The intent of the program is to post the banners along a major boulevard in Diamond Bar, with the banner stating the name and branch of service of an individual soldier. The banner would be posted while the soldier is on active duty. When the tour of duty is completed, the banner is then given to the family or to the soldier. Banners would be posted and removed at six month intervals. In other words, every six months, new banners can be posted, and banners of soldiers who have completed their active duty can be removed. A ceremony or presentation can be held at a Council meeting every six months to recognize the soldiers and family members prior to the posting or after the removal of the banners. Due to privacy issues, the military does not release the names of soldiers serving in the military. The City will be required to solicit names through news releases, cable TV, the City's website, the posting of flyers in the community, letters to participants of City's Veterans Day Recognition Ceremony, and word of mouth. Decisions that need to be made to establish this program include: 1. Who will pay for banners, hardware and the installation/removal costs? Recommendation: f=amily pays for banner and installation/removal ($110), City pays for hardware ($115). An option to this is to solicit local service organizations to contribute toward the cost of providing banners and hardware. 2. Design of banner/Name of program. Recommendation: If the program is approved by the City Council, staff will present proposed designs at a future meeting for Council consideration. The name of the program can be determined at that meeting as well. 3. Location of posting. Recommendation: Along Diamond Bar Boulevard. 4. Methods to solicit participants: Recommendations: a) News Releases to local newspapers. b) Articles in monthly City newsletter. c) Letters to participants of City's Veterans Day Recognition program. d) Flyers posted in the community. e) City's website. f) Cable TV. 5. Total estimated annual program cost for 25 banners: $6,346 Estimated off -setting revenue if participants are charged $110 for the banners (25 participants): 2 750 Estimated net costs: $3,596 Prepared by: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services Lorry Meyer, Community Services Coordinator CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Budget for Proposed Military Banners Program To provide banners to honor military personnel from Diamond Bar that are currently serving on active duty. Budget is based on the participant paying for the banner and its installation and removal. The City would promote the program and pay for the hardware to support the banner. Estimated participation is 25 banners per year. REVENUE PROJECTION: $2,750.00 Participants are charged $110 for the banner and its installation and removal iestimated 25 artici ants) TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET PROJECTED EXPENDITURES $ 6,346.00 PROJECTED NET COSTS PERSONNEL SERVICES Total Amount Budgeted: $ 421.00 Personnel (40030) Amount Budgeted: Recreation Coordinator 4 weeks x 4 hours x 25.00 hour $ 400.00 Personnel Services (40000) Amount Budgeted: Worker's Compensation (40083) @3.8% $ 15.20 Medicare (40085) @ 1.45% $ 5.80 SUPPLIES (41200) $ 5,625.00 Operating Supplies (001.5350.41200) Amount Budgeted: Banners (25 x 110) $ 2,750.00 This includes sales tax, installation and delivery Brackets $ 2,875.00 ADVERTISING (42115) $300.00 Advertising (001.5350.42115) $300.00 Agenda No. 6.1.1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION DRAFT MARCH 21, 2006 STUDY SESSION: Mayor Herrera called the Study Session to order at 5:31 p.m. in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. Present: Council Members Chang, Tanaka, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Zirbes and Mayor Herrera. Also Present: Linda Lowry, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Nancy Fong, Interim Community Development Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Sharon Gomez, Public Works Services Manager; Ryan McLean, Senior Management Analyst; Ken Desforges, IS Director, and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. 1) Review Sports Field CIP — Lorbeer Field. CSD/Rose reported that the City has $1,250,000 in the current fiscal year Budget set aside to construct improvements such as install artificial turf on the lower lighted football field and to build a restroom building at Lorbeer Middle School. Since the Budget was approved, local organizations have come forward asking for improvements to alternative facilities instead of Lorbeer Middle School including installing lights at the D.B. Little League Facility and YMCA. If the City were to light the alternative facilities it would provide more flexibility and additional locations for organizations to participate in youth sports activities. For example, instead of just a soccer field the City would have a baseball field; girls softball could use the YMCA facilities and by lighting those facilities it would take pressure off of other facilities such as Peterson and Pantera Parks. Staff met with Pomona Unified School District today and reached agreement that there should be improvements made to the Lorbeer lower football field. Staff and the School District officials also agreed that it would not be necessary to install artificial turf in order to meet the needs of the lower football field. As a result, there is a possibility of reaching an agreement to improve the turf to a level of service available prior to the installation of lighting. This compromise would render the field more playable and usable by the community at a much lower cost. Terms of how the field would consistently be maintained would need to be negotiated between staff and the School District. Staff is seeking direction from the City Council to pursue alternative options; including, consideration for Paul C. Grow and Summitridge Parks, the pursuit of cost estimates, and reporting back to Council the results of ongoing negotiations with the School District, Little League and YMCA. MPT/Zirbes said he was encouraged to hear that the Pomona Unified School District was moving forward and agreed that the cost proposal for the field and restroom facility was high. He wanted assurance that if the City invested money at Lorbeer, staff would be able to work out the appropriate maintenance MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 2 CC STUDY SESSION agreement with the School District. He asked if staff could also research the feasibility, cost of lighting the upper field and upgrading the track. He liked the idea of the City investing in lights for the Little League field and at Paul C. Grow Park as long as staff was able to reach a partnership agreement for those two facilities as well. He asked if there was a timeline for moving forward. CSD/Rose responded that staff was meeting again with the School District next week. CM/Lowry said that at the last meeting, prior to today, Pomona's attorney was going to write up an agreement. At the end of the most recent meeting, City staff was asked to begin the structure of an agreement. Staff has assumed the lead on pushing the items forward and there seems to be an eagerness to work toward a win-win plan for the District and the City. Staff wants to also create a win-win with the Little League and the YMCA to spread lighting across all fields. MPT/Zirbes said he felt that it was a good way to proceed because it is a good opportunity for the City to bring a lot more fields on-line. MPTIZirbes asked if the slope at Lorbeer that dropped down from the field to the sidewalk along Golden Springs Drive could be considered part of the field that would be improved. CM/Lowry responded that Pomona, particularly wanted the lower part of the field improved. CSD/Rose said that Pomona was open to discussion and in particular, the discussion about the football field and the track. Pomona was not particularly interested in talking about the other field at this time because they believed it would complicate the discussion and take focus away from the field that was already lighted. During the meeting, staff brought up the slope, but did not spend a lot of time discussing that particular area. However, he felt it was a good point and deserved further assessment. C/Tye asked if staff was moving away from artificial turf to grass. GSD/Rose responded yes. C/Tye asked if staff contemplated rubberizing the track. CSD/Rose stated that staff would look at renovating the track, but not rubberizing and that staff would be looking into a long-term approach to improving the track once the drainage mitigation costs were determined. C/Tanaka said he liked staffs approach to presenting alternatives because it appeared that because the process had gone on for two years the Board had grown to distrust the process even though they would have first priority over the MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 3 CC STUDY SESSION field. By spending less at Lorbeer and improving other facilities it would offer greater field use by the youth groups. C/Chang said that since the beginning, Pomona has failed to move forward with discussions. He agreed with C/Tanaka that the Board was skeptical and the Board Members who were initially involved in the discussions were no longer in their positions or were no longer communicating with D.B. staff. He felt it would be good for staff to have another meeting with the Pomona School Board, lay all of the cards on the table and let them respond and let them know that D.B. had no intention of controlling the field at Lorbeer. The field belongs to the people and that the City is attempting to improve the fields so that residents can use them. C/Tye asked if there had been any confrontations between the City and the School District since the lighting was installed at Lorbeer. CSD/Rose said that no confrontation between the City and the School District had occurred. In fact, today's discussion pointed out to all participants that both entities were on the same side of the issue and were negotiating in good faith to find the best and most appropriate community use of the facility. The School Board members brought up issues of residents assuming control by forcing the gates open and parking vehicles out on the basketball courts and onto the fields as well as confronting District staff when staff members asked residents to take their vehicles off of the basketball court and turf. The City explained that it deals with the same types of issues at the City parks and that staff wants to be able to work with the School District to determine what type of control they want over their facilities. Staff believes that there are methods for dealing with these types of issues and agrees that ultimately the long term maintenance of the facility once turf or grass is installed is the most important issue that needs to be resolved. CM/Lowry stated that CSD/Rose shared his expectations with the School staff that the fields should be maintained like the City's park fields and he was, in fact, offering that level of maintenance to the school field. When CSD/Rose shared how he maintains the fields there was a sense of relief that the City would actually take the fields out of use for a period of six weeks to regenerate them. Her personal impression was that the District's reaction to the City was that it wanted those fields 2417, and once the City was able to install artificial turf, nothing would stop D.B. from constant and ongoing use. Based on their expectations, it is logical that they would drag their feet on the matter of installing artificial turf. CSD/Rose felt that the District was relieved to find out that the City would not be using the State's model for a joint agreement, since the City was not able to get State grant funds for field improvements. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 4 CC STUDY SESSION C/Tye believed the public's perception was that the District thought that if it could not be done for all of the middle schools it should not be done for Lorbeer, which he felt was a preposterous position. CM/Lowry felt the School District was surprised by this perception. In fact, Pomona could increase the use of their resources if they would negotiate with D.B. over the maintenance of Lorbeer fields and that there was a very high potential for a win-win agreement and the Board was eager to show progress. MPT/Zirbes asked if CSD/Rose felt that the School District would allow the City's contractors to do the maintenance. CSD/Rose felt that they would not at this point and that was part of the issue that they needed to discuss. M/Herrera said she was glad that staff was moving toward some type of agreement with the School District. Council directed staff to continue negotiations with the School District and present Council with a report on the amount needed to cure Lorbeer as well as provide a proposal with costs to upgrade other fields as proposed. Public Comments: None Offered. 2) Library Survey Results. ACM/Doyle introduced Jonathan Brown with Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates who stated that the survey results were fairly straightforward. Three quarters of likely voters favor a new library. However, when a description of the funding mechanism is offered to them and a second vote is taken 36% said they would vote for a new library, 34% said they would not and 21 % were looking for more information or were undecided. He said he would like to be able to offer more analysis but the questions that were approved by the Council pretty much speak for themselves. MPT/Zirbes explained that the Council interpreted the survey results the same as the Consultant. What the Council wanted to know was how reliable the Survey results were and what portion of the 17% could be expected to move into the "yes" category with more information. How many "no" responses would move into the "yes" category with more information, etc, and what was the likelihood that 47% could be increased to 67% to ensure passage of a ballot measure? He asked Mr. Brown to comment based on his experience whether he believed based on the survey results a ballot measure would be successful. Mr. Brown responded to MPT/Zirbes that it would be very difficult to answer his question. The original survey was designed to focus on all of the individual MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 5 CC STUDY SESSION aspects of the Library plan to see what would be more or less popular with voters, what additional aspects of the measure could be written in, such as a citizen's oversight committee or annual audits that would provide public trust and make it more popular with voters. It is conjecture on his part because the way that the survey was returned to Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates did not follow the organization's usual structure. When 46% say "yes' he would presume that those individuals would definitely or probably vote "yes." These are people who are pretty well convinced that with a minimal amount of information that they are in agreement with the project. How strong the "no" vote is he could not say. He said ordinarily the survey included questions about whether people felt overburdened by taxes or their personal economic situation with additional questions measured on those "need more information voters" to see who they were, what aspects of the Library would be most popular with them and so forth. And with that information he would be better equipped to extrapolate the information and go through a series of questions as more information was presented to see how that information would ultimately impact "yes" and "no" votes. With 46% of your likely voters saying they would vote for this, he would not rule out that the number could increase to a sufficient level to get the measure passed, but he could not tell the Council based on the survey whether they would vote "yes" or what might prompt them to do so. C/Tanaka asked if a question about party affiliation was asked during the survey. Mr. Brown responded No. That information is from the voter file as it says on the survey. MlHerrera said that some people who were surveyed were asked that question. Mr. Brown responded that his firm conducts about 200 surveys a year and this would be the first time that he had heard that statement. MlHerrera asked where Mr. Brown's firm got the people who conducted the survey. Mr. Brown responded that his firm subcontracts to several phone banks that specialize in doing surveys. He could not say what firm provided the service for the D.B. survey but said he would be able to provide the information to ACM/Doyle. MlHerrera asked if it was possible that the people who conducted the survey were not located in California or even in the western part of the United States. Mr. Brown responded yes. MlHerrera asked if it were possible the surveyors resided outside of the United States. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 6 CC STUDY SESSION Mr. Brown responded, "No". M/Herrera said she would like to know where the surveyors were from. Mr. Brown said his firm works with only four companies and has done so on a continuing basis for 20 years. These are businesses with which his firm has a very longstanding business relationship and he trusts them implicitly to do the work on behalf of the firm. ACM/Doyle asked if such a question would have been in the script given to the survey company. Mr. Brown responded No. It was a check to make sure that the calls were being done properly. The surveyor has the name of the person as well as their voter registration information, which includes gender and it says "gender by observation" so his firm uses that as a double check and a safeguard that the calls are being made as promised. MPTIZirbes referred Mr. Brown to question #1. When people were asked how often they used the Library 37% said "often" or "sometimes," 62% "rarely" and $'never." He wondered if rarely and never would feel compelled to vote "yes" for this type of ballot initiative. Mr. Brown said that clearly, 75% in the next question say they favor a new library and that is essentially the entire group that responded "often" "sometimes" or "rarely." Some people may pop into the Library once in a blue moon but they may also be aware of the need for a new library and are interested in pursuing it. ACM/Doyle explained that the survey consultant said that when people respond "rarely" or "never' it is still not clear whether those individuals would be going to some other library instead of using the D.B. library because it might be inadequate for their needs. Mr. Brown agreed and stated that when his firm presents these types of questions it tries to avoid adjectives and be more specific. For example, his firm would ask "do you use the Library once a month, several times a year, only in very rare circumstances or never and provide an option for folks who use public libraries and not just D.B. public libraries. He said he did not know what "often" $$sometimes" "rarely" and "never' really meant to people because those were very general terms. People who visit the Library the same number of times might answer the question "often" or "rarely" depending on their individual perception of the question. MPTIZirbes asked if Mr. Brown's firm would have any voting outcome data on prior surveys with numbers similar to this survey regarding libraries in other communities. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 7 CC STUDY SESSION Mr. Brown said he would provide the data to the Council. The difficulty is that in every other library survey his firm has conducted the questions were asked in a different manner. There would be some level of comparison that could be made but it would not be an apples -to -apples comparison. MPT/Zirbes said he would be reluctant to put something on the ballot without having a strong feeling for its successful outcome. Mr. Brown said his firm attempted to present a survey that would have come a lot closer to answering those questions. C/Tanaka asked the timeframe to get this issue on the November ballot. ACM/Doyle said that the drop -dead date would be about August 12 to 14. C/Tanaka was concerned that it was getting too late to do an adequate educational campaign that would influence the survey numbers. ACM/Doyle responded to M/Herrera that she was correct that there was a State measure on the June ballot for $600 million for library improvements similar to the last bond issue for $350 million. The downgrading of the D.B. application involved a number of different areas including public transportation, which was a requirement of the prior bond act. The only certainty at this time was that there would be a bond act measure on the June ballot that would either be passed or defeated and if passed, a committee would be appointed to create the rules or guidelines for distributing the funds. Further, it is unknown at this time whether D.B. would be able to use its same application or have to completely revise its application. ACM/Doyle stated that the legislation written for the June bond measure provided that consideration would be given to applications that made it to the third round and that there could be no less than $20 million or so associated with each application. There was no indication, however, that those applications would be given a higher priority or higher preference. Originally it was believed that those in the third round would be a shoe -in, but that was not the way the legislation was passed. MPT/Zirbes said that the Committee could decide to give priority to the third round applicants. ACM/Doyle agreed that they could but that the legislation did not address that eventuality. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 8 CC STUDY SESSION Public Comments: Clyde Hennessee said he was tired of the City's money being spent on this Library issue. 50% of the population of D.B. said they would not pay for this Library and he wanted to know at what point the issue would die. Marnie Shay felt the City should go out on a limb and move forward with the process because if you look at the number of people who are willing to pay for a Library and those that would like information the numbers add up to almost the 67%. People who know nothing about the proposed new Llibrary would probably say "No" but if everyone worked together it could provide the education necessary for the citizens to make a solid decision and do the right thing. A library is more than just a place for books it is a place to bring members of the community together to communicate. Kathleen Newe felt that Mrs. Shay made an excellent statement when she said the Library would bring the community together and be a focal point for the City. In her opinion, it was up to everyone to pull together to help the citizens make an informed decision. If the Council puts the measure on the ballot and launches an educational process to inform the community the measure would have a chance to pass. Marsha Hawkins said she believed that 75% meant a strong "yes" for the new Library. She felt that the prospects were extremely good for an educational campaign. The Council had an opportunity to do that with this survey but chose not to do it. Otherwise, the City would have clear answers now so that instead of dragging feet, the community could move forward. Allen Wilson said it was great to educate the community about what it wanted to do and what it did not want to do. During the last City Council meeting a number of students came forward to say they wanted a place to "hang out" and he was not going to pay property taxes to turn a library into a nanny state. There are enough computers in a lot of households in this community. It's a highly educated community and the parents are highly educated and the kids are highly educated. But he was still concerned about the results of question 3 with 46% saying they wanted (a new library) and 34% saying they did not want (a new library). Ultimately, it is the "No" responses the City has to be concerned about. There is no way that two-thirds of this City will approve a new Library. Some of us have had it — especially after the last City Council meeting where we saw all of these kids coming up to speak. It's great if they want it when they don't have to put their money where their mouth is and they say we might as well pay for it. When he started the Community Foundation, it was an effort to raise money as a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that told the City what it wanted to do and the Foundation was doing all it could to raise the necessary funds but it takes a lot of effort. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 9 CC STUDY SESSION Carolyn Anderson asked permission to speak on another topic and said that Waste Management was proudly serving the residents of D.B. At the end of their contract, they hoped the City would grant an extension. Waste Management intends to put four new clean -air vehicles into service in the City of D.B. in the month of April. In addition, her firm is working with staff to implement a recycling plan in the City's offices and is developing new educational pieces. It is true that the company divested the Inland Empire's "Waste Management of the Desert", but the Los Angeles market area is strong and there are no plans for further divestiture. C/Chang said that the Library had been on the City's agenda for several years, and that this was a good project and a good investment for the community and that is why the City has spent time talking about a new library. He did not agree with those people who were speaking so negatively about the community. This is a good project for the community, and he asked residents not to paint a negative picture. Since the City was not able to obtain the grant funds, it is now time to decide whether to move forward. If the Council decided to move forward, it would be time to leave it to the voters to decide. Although he has never encountered such a survey with only three questions formulated like this survey, he agreed with Council to move forward with the survey, and the survey does not indicate that the City should drop the project. Even without a good educational program a good percentage of the residents sent a strong message that they want to have a good library. He felt the Council should place the matter on the ballot and launch an educational campaign so that the residents could decide. This could drag on and on if the City keeps waiting for grant money. In order to control the City's destiny this matter should be placed on the ballot so that the people can once and for all decide whether they want to build a new library. In his opinion, the Library would be a good place for kids to "hang out." M/Herrera said she was not ready to abandon the City's grant application because the City had invested $200,000 toward acquiring grant funds, especially when the City might have another chance to obtain funds to build the facility. She felt that the voters and residents deserved every good effort that the City could make to afford them services they would like to have. She had concerns about the residents being willing to pay for a new library, so she would like to explore an application. MPTIZirbes stated that the Council had until August to put the matter on the November ballot and by that time the June ballot would have been decided. In addition, the Council asked for additional information about the data from the consultant. If the City were successful in getting $10 million in grant funds toward the construction of a new library it would of course be the best option. He also agreed that the people should decide, but he did not believe tonight was the night to make that decision because there was time between now and August to make a determination. In the meantime the Council has an opportunity to gather more information and see what happens with the June ballot. During discussion of an MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 9 CC STUDY SESSION Carolyn Anderson asked permission to speak on another topic and said that Waste Management was proudly serving the residents of D.B. At the end of their contract, they hoped the City would grant an extension. Waste Management intends to put four new clean -air vehicles into service in the City of D.B. in the month of April. In addition, her firm is working with staff to implement a recycling plan in the City's offices and is developing new educational pieces. It is true that the company divested the Inland Empire's "Waste Management of the Desert", but the Los Angeles market area is strong and there are no plans for further divestiture. C/Chang said that the Library had been on the City's agenda for several years, and that this was a good project and a good investment for the community and that is why the City has spent time talking about a new library. He did not agree with those people who were speaking so negatively about the community. This is a good project for the community, and he asked residents not to paint a negative picture. Since the City was not able to obtain the grant funds, it is now time to decide whether to move forward. If the Council decided to move forward, it would be time to leave it to the voters to decide. Although he has never encountered such a survey with only three questions formulated like this survey, he agreed with Council to move forward with the survey, and the survey does not indicate that the City should drop the project. Even without a good educational program a good percentage of the residents sent a strong message that they want to have a good library. He felt the Council should place the matter on the ballot and launch an educational campaign so that the residents could decide. This could drag on and on if the City keeps waiting for grant money. In order to control the City's destiny this matter should be placed on the ballot so that the people can once and for all decide whether they want to build a new library. In his opinion, the Library would be a good place for kids to "hang out." M/Herrera said she was not ready to abandon the City's grant application because the City had invested $200,000 toward acquiring grant funds, especially when the City might have another chance to obtain funds to build the facility. She felt that the voters and residents deserved every good effort that the City could make to afford them services they would like to have. She had concerns about the residents being willing to pay for a new library, so she would like to explore an application. MPTIZirbes stated that the Council had until August to put the matter on the November ballot and by that time the June ballot would have been decided. In addition, the Council asked for additional information about the data from the consultant. If the City were successful in getting $10 million in grant funds toward the construction of a new library it would of course be the best option. He also agreed that the people should decide, but he did not believe tonight was the night to make that decision because there was time between now and August to make a determination. In the meantime the Council has an opportunity to gather more information and see what happens with the June ballot. During discussion of an MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 10 CC STUDY SESSION educational campaign he wondered who would do it and who would pay for it. And, if the City was expected to pay for the educational campaign where would the money come from? If the Council continues to discuss this issue and get more information at each of its subsequent meetings, it would be better prepared to arrive at a good decision that everyone would feel comfortable about. If the ballot fails in June the City would have little choice but to place the measure on the November ballot. C/Chang said that even if the bond passed, it would not guarantee that the City would receive grant funds. Assuming passage, the earliest the City would possibly get an answer would be in 2008. C/Tanaka asked if the bond application and the Council's decision to place this matter on the November ballot were mutually exclusive, or could the City move forward with an educational campaign. MlHerrera responded that ACM/Doyle indicated the City would probably not get a judgment by August. If the ballot measure passed in June, it could take another six months for the Legislature to figure out who would decide the rules of the disbursements. Therefore, the two items were independent of one another. ACM/Doyle responded that there was nothing in the legislation to preclude the City from placing the matter on the November ballot and moving forward with an educational program. Specifically, the legislation says that if cities spend any money toward construction it would be ineligible for bond money. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the City Council, MlHerrera adjourned the Study Session at 6:35 p.m. Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of , 2006. CAROL HERRERA, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Agenda No. 6.1.2 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND B/0 MARCH 21, 2006��' STUDY SESSION: 5:31 p.m., Room CC -8, AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. ► Review Sports Field CIP — Lorbeer Field ► Library Survey M/Herrera adjourned the Study Session at 6:35 p.m. to the Regular City Council Meeting. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Herrera called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:44 p.m. in AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. M/Herrera reported that during the Study Session, Council discussed Sports Field Improvements at Lorbeer Middle School and the Library Survey results. The City Council will continue to discuss these two issues at future study sessions. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: M/Herrera led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Ian DeOrio, Pastor, Young Adults Diamond Canyon Christian Church gave the Invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Tanaka, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Zirbes and Mayor Herrera. Staff Present: Linda Lowry, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Nancy Fong, Interim Community Development Director; Ken Desforges, Information Systems Director; Ryan McLean, Senior Management Analyst; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Sharon Gomez, Public Works Services Manager; and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 C/Tanaka presented a City Tile to outgoing Planning Commissioner Ruth Low; MPT/Zirbes presented a City Tile to outgoing Planning Commissioner Dan Nolan; Jody Roberto on behalf of Assemblyman Bob Huff's Office presented Certificates of Recognition to Dan Nolan and Ruth Low. M/Herrera congratulated Ling -Ling Chang on her appointment to the Walnut Valley Water Board and Nancy Lyons on her appointment to the Walnut Valley Unified School District Board; C/Tye presented a City Tile to outgoing Parks and Recreation Commissioner Ling -Ling Chang; C/Chang presented a City Tile to outgoing Parks and Recreation Commissioner Nancy Lyons. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL Jody Roberto, on behalf of Assemblyman Bob Huffs office, presented Certificates of Recognition to Ling -Ling Chang, stating that Ms. Chang had just been named "Woman of the Year'', and to Nancy Lyons. M/Herrera recognized Arun Virginkar, outgoing Traffic and Transportation Commissioner who was not present and informed the audience that a City Tile would be mailed to him. Ms. Roberto also gave a Certificate on behalf of Assemblyman Huffs office to Mr. Virginkar. 1.2 M/Herrera presented Certificates of Recognition to the Diamond Ranch High School Girls Basketball Team forwinning the CIF Basketball Championship. Jody Roberto, Assemblyman Bob Huff's office also presented certificates to the team members. 1.3 MPT/Zirbes proclaimed March 2006 American Red Cross month. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 Presentation of "Working Together for Traffic Solutions" the City's information video on why the SR57/60 interchange needs to be fixed. ACM/Doyle stated that the City Council has played a lead role in addressing many traffic and transportation issues that plague D.B. as well as the entire region. MlHerrera sits on the Four Corners Transportation Policy Group as well as a number of other transportation related agencies. The City is working with Pomona, Brea and Chino Hills to develop a Four Corners Transportation Coalition that would take the projects it identified as the top four priority projects of the Four Corners Policy Group and work with private sector companies and other cities within the Region to provide funds to lobby for construction of those projects. D.B.'s number one priority and one of the top four projects for the Transportation Coalition is the 57/60 interchange final fix. In anticipation of the creation of the coalition, D.B. has created an informational video that would provide other cities, private sector businesses and State and Federal legislators information that would lead to the funding of this project in future years. The City is currently developing an initial study for interchange alternatives in partnership with MTA and the City of Industry. The results of the Study should be available in about a year. At that time additional funds would be required to move forward to complete the design work and ultimately obtain Federal funds for construction. The video presentation followed. ACM/Doyle referred Council to Agenda Item 6.14 for Council Consideration, which is a resolution approving in concept the Four Corners Transportation Coalition, appointing M/Herrera as the Council's representative and appropriating funds for membership dues. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Irene Wang, D.B. Librarian, invited residents to a Citizenship Application Workshop on Tuesday, March 28 at 7:30 p.m. The program is open to all legal permanent residents of all ethnic backgrounds throughout the MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL San Gabriel Valley area. During the workshop the following free services will be provided: Assistance in verifying eligibility for citizenship, help for individuals to complete their citizenship applications, the taking of application photographs, and sending of the applications to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Office. In addition, study aids will be provided to help prepare individuals for their citizenship interview and examination. The only required fee is the $400 filing and fingerprint fee. The fee for individuals aged 75 and above is $330. Irene Wang also spoke about the library's adult and young adult seminar called "A Roadmap to College." Due to the success of the Princeton Review seminar the Library has decided to hold several additional seminars and workshops in conjunction with college applications. For instance, this Saturday there will be a free SAT practice test at the Library. Unfortunately, only 56 students are able to attend and there are 30 students on the waiting list. The Library hopes to accommodate the waiting list this Summer. In April the students will be able to review their scores. Ms. Wang stated that there are many programs at the Library including free story time for young children, babies and toddlers. The weekly programs are very popular and the average attendance has grown to 60-70 children and adults. Clyde Hennessee said that according to the Library Survey data 46% of the residents were not willing to pay additional taxes for the next 30 years to support a new library. An individual suggested that more information be provided for the residents. He reiterated that he was tired of hearing about the Library and tired of the City spending money on any type of private and commercial advertising for the Library. The people who want the Library have the funds to build it and they can pay for the advertising. He said he did not want the City, its officials and staff spending any more time and money on the Library issue. Larry Smith said he has resided in D.B. since 1979 and was very proud of the community including the worldwide recognition of its excellent education of its young people. If D.B. wants to continue being known for its excellent education and for its good values that have been fostered through good educational opportunities it must continue to grow. In his opinion, a world-class library was an important part of any community and particularly one that was based on education. He noted that the City of San Marino recently spent $13 million to build a library. Libraries evolve and a D.B. Library would provide opportunities for kids to learn on-line and have textbooks on file from the local schools. He said he has heard people talk about the school population shrinking and that there would not be enough kids to support a new library in the future and that because property values are increasing it becomes increasingly difficult for young families to live in D.B. He said he could not believe that the demographics would be much different between the two cities and if the City of San Marino believed a new library was valuable to the citizens, would it not also be true of D.B. Studies show that libraries enhanced community property values. If 46% of the people said they would vote to support a new library 30% said they would not, that means that 70% plus would actually support a new library. Because there were so many people undecided at this point, the reasonable thing for the City to do would be to place the matter on the ballot. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL Allen Wilson requested a correction on the Consent Calendar Item 6.1.1 to read "aging" population rather than an "Asian" population. During the Study Session the Library issue was once again discussed. If it is something the City wants, the question is whether the citizens are willing to be taxed in order to pay for a new library. He for one will not pay for it. He encouraged everyone to attend the Wine Soiree this Sunday at the Diamond Bar Center to help raise funds for a new library. He said that individuals could also write a check to the non-profit Diamond Bar Community Foundation if they wanted to donate to the Library. It appears that the students who spoke at the last City Council meeting want a place to hang out and he does not pay for a place for someone to hang out. People go to the library to get information for careers, research for school projects or personal enjoyment. Question #3 (of the Library Survey) was "are you in favor of the Library" ; 46% said "Yes" — 34% said "No" and 34% is the figure he is very concerned about. He does not want the City to spend $80,000 on an election with money the City does not have. The City should take the conservative approach. There is an application pending through the Library Bond and the City should wait to see what happens with that Bond and hope for miracles. In the process, if the residents roll up their sleeves and put their money where their mouths are, the residents do not have to go into debt and can make a contribution with tax benefits. He felt it was not fair to tax the children. George Wei felt that most people would access the Internet at their homes and not at the Library. Young kids use the Internet more than they would use a new library. If D.B. wanted to build a new library it should have done it 10 years ago because it is already too late. The information infrastructure has changed from a library to a more accessible Internet. He recommended that the City promote itself to be a wireless City instead of spending so much money to build a library that would be outdated as soon as it was finished. He also felt the location of the proposed facility would not be accessible because younger kids would not go to the Library when they could get the information at home. Osman Wei said the more he hears about the library and the video rerun from the last Council meeting the more questions he has. The subject is full of controversy. He wanted to know who was asked (through the survey) whether they would be willing to build a library and be taxed to build it because if the person being surveyed was not a homeowner he would surely respond "yes." As a homeowner he and 30 of his neighbors who own their homes were never surveyed. D.B. has 30,000 voters and 15,000 properties. The property owners should be asked if they approve of the property owners paying for a new library — do they believe it is fair? In his opinion, the survey should be thrown out. During the last City Council meeting several young people asked the City Council for a place to hang out. The City has the obligation to supply a good library but the City has no obligation to be babysitting the kids after school if they just want a place to hang out. People who do not live in D.B. are telling the residents they need a library that would benefit the citizens who live in neighboring cities. He said that there was a lot more information he would need before he could decide on whether the residents should spend $13 million to build a new library. What would it look like, what does it mean that it would be three times larger— larger than what, the current facility? The City of Cerritos spent $65 million MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL to build a library and performing arts center and they are now facing a crisis because each year the City has to find $10.5 million to maintain the facility. Fortunately, Cerritos has 27 car dealerships that provide $1 million each in tax revenue to the City. D.B. does not have that kind of income stream. He asked the City Council to please reconsider the issue. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: ACM/Doyle explained that as part of the application process for the last Library Bond issue, the City compiled profile drawings for the proposed library and created a 3-dimensional computer animation that has been played on DBTV. M/Herrera explained that if the City moved toward a ballot measure more specific plans would be shared with the residents. ACM/Doyle further stated that the library was designed based on the requirements of the Bond issue. There is no guarantee or commitment that it would be the library that would be built although the Council has moved forward on that premise. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — March 23, 2006 — 7:00 p.m., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.2 Diamond Bar Friends of the Library Wine Soiree — March 26, 2006 — 4:00 - 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar Center, 1600 Grand Ave. 5.3 Planning Commission Meeting — March 28, 2006 — 7:00 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 5.4 City Council Meeting — April 4, 2006 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Tanaka requested corrections to Item 6.1.2, specifically, corrections in the spelling of names of two of the speakers during Public Comments. C/Chang moved, C/Tye seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented including corrections to Items 6.1.1 and 6.1.2. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Tanaka, Tye, MPT/Zirbes, M/Herrera NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6.1 APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: 6.1 .1 Study Session of February 21, 2006 — as corrected. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of February 21, 2006 — as corrected. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of February 14, 2006. 6.3 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER— Ratifying check register containing checks dated March 9 and March 16, 2006 in an amount totaling $666,591.38. 6.4 DENIED CLAIMS: 6.4.1 Filed by Sid Sarnobat on January 9, 2006. 6.4.2 Filed by Enrique De La Rosa on February 15, 2006. 6.5 APPROVED LETTER AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-17: URGING CONGRESS TO PROTECT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 FEDERAL BUDGET. 6.6 APPROVED LETTER AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-18: OPPOSING LOS ANGELES MAYOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA'S REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE RED LINE SUBWAY. 6.7 APPROVED LICENSE AGREEMENTS WITH NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS, PCS, LLC, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, T -MOBILE, USA, AND LOS ANGELES SMSA PARTNERSHIP DBA VERIZON WIRELESS TO CO- DEVELOP TWO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SITES AT SUMMITRIDGE PARK. 6.8 APPROPRIATED $17,590 FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET; AWARDED DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE WASHINGTON STREET CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO DMS CONSULTANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,590; AND, AUTHORIZED A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR CHANGE ORDER TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $17,590. 6.9 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 WITH MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING RESOURCES (M.E.R.) FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $90,000. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL 6.10 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-19: APPROVING JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 3; AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION OF TRACT NO. 31850 (1985, 22 SFR BY DB DEVELOPMENT CORP., ON LEYLAND DRIVE BETWEEN BENFIELD PLACE AND WYNNEWOOD DRIVE) TRACT NO. 42564 (1992 74 SFR BY BRAMALEA, INC., ON LEYLAND DRIVE, NEWBURY WAY, AND BENEFIELD PLACE), PARCEL MAP NO. 18722 (COUNTRY HILLS TOWNE CENTER, 2797 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD) L 077-1 (1992, 55 CONDOMINIUMS AT 800 GRAND AVENUE), L 086-9, (1971, ST. DENIS CATHOLIC CHURCH, 2151 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD) AND L 119-7 (DIAMOND BAR VILLAGE APARTMENTS, 1750-2000 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD BETWEEN ACACIA HILL ROAD AND MOUNTAIN LAUREL WAY) TO COUNTY LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006. 6.11 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-20., APPROVING JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT; AND, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 APPROVING AND ACEPTING THE NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION OF L 034-99 (LA FITNESS, 20801 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND DIAMOND PLAZA, 20855 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) TO COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006. 6.12 (a) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-21: GRANTING CONSENT AND JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006 AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1, DIAMOND BAR ZONE, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, L 062-2005 (ORIENTAIL NURSERY, 1035 BANNING WAY AND BANNING WAY PLAZA, 20655 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) AND PARCEL MAP 22987 (BEST WESTERN HOTEL, 259 GENTLE SPRINGS LANE) MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL (b) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-22: APPROVING JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT; AND, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT NO.5 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION OF L 062-2005 (ORIENTAL NURSERY, 1035 BANNING WAY AND BANNING WAY PLAZA, 20655 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) TO COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006. (c) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-23: APPROVING JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THREE VALLEYS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT; AND, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT NO.5 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION OF PARCEL MAP 22987 (BEST WESTERN HOTEL 259 GENTLE SPRINGS LANE) TO COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006. 6.13 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24: ESTABLISHING A REIMBURSEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 53232.2 AND 53232.3 (AB1234). 6.14 ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2006-25: AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO JOIN THE FOUR CORNERS TRANSPORTATION COALITION, DESIGNATED THE MAYOR AND/OR HER DESIGNEE AS THE CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE, AND APPROPRIATED $10,000 FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES. M/Herrera said that with respect to Item 6.14 D.B., was the first City to act and she was very proud of D.B. for taking a leadership role. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None. MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTSICOUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: MPT/Zirbes said he would withhold his comments until the next meeting and thanked everyone for their presence this evening. MPT/Zirbes left the dais at approximately 8.00 p.m. C/Tanaka reported that on March 12 he attended the Eagle Scout Court of Honor for Ryan Perez; Tuesday March 14 he attended the Pomona Unified School District Board meeting, a very extensive meeting that was also attended by CSD/Rose to discuss improvements to the Lorbeer Middle School football field and alternative options; March 17 he attended Senator Gloria Romero's seminar on prescription drug programs and Medicare. As a member of the D.B. Senior Citizens Club there are a lot of questions that arise as to the options on part D that are coming up and some of the other plans that individuals can take for prescription drugs and other options. It was a very well attended seminar and portions were also presented in Spanish. Saturday March 18 he attended the 58th Annual California Parks and Recreations Society Awards and Installation Banquet that was also attended by many staff members during which D.B. received an award for excellence in facilities design for a medium sized city (50,000-100,000). He participated in the National League of Cities conference call on the Youth Master Plan and listened to five other cities and how they are progressing in their plans. He had an opportunity to share in D.B.'s plans and their progress in that process. He attended the Legislative Subcommittee meeting with M/Herrera and SMA/McLean. He had an opportunity to review Assembly and Senate bills and discuss potential impacts and make recommendations to either oppose or support those kinds of legislations. March 25 the Miss Diamond Bar Pageant will take place at 7:00 p.m. at Mt. SAC. He reminded residents about the Wine Soiree on Sunday March 26 from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. C/Chang received telephone calls from residents who were concerned about the trees that were removed from the Grand Ave. median at Golden Springs Dr. He reminded residents that the Council voted to remove the aged and unhealthy trees from the median and replace them with a better variety. D.B. is a Tree City and is very concerned about the look of its medians. He was pleased that residents living near Summitridge Park would soon enjoy improved cell phone reception with the installation of two towers. The Brea Canyon Rd. exit is open and he asked PWD/Liu to request Caltrans to put up a sign to help drivers realize they are approaching the exit as well as to remain in the proper lane to continue on the SR 57 toward Brea. C/Chang commented on the speaker's comments regarding the Library. In terms of the library being outdated and that the Internet would replace a library, the numbers do not lie. The Internet has been in use for almost 10 years. The attendance at the library and the book checkout rate has not declined during that period. in fact, the attendance and checkout rate has increased and those facts are not in dispute. CalPoly-Pomona is expanding their library because the usage is heavy and the library is popular. Regarding the proposal for D.B. to be a wireless City, that scenario is already on the drawing board and D.B. is moving in that direction thanks MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL to staff and especially to ISD/Ken Desforges and the IS Department. ISD/Desforges reported that the City had received preliminary approval from SoCal Edison to mount WiFi assets to their light poles, subject to negotiation of a contract at market rates. C/Chang said he hated to have residents beating down the young people by accusing them of wanting a "hangout." The young people stated many reasons they wanted a library and he believed that the term "hangout" was taken out of context. He said he did not believe the young people intended to use the Library as a "hangout" nor would they be allowed to do so. C/Tye thanked ACM/Doyle for his excellent presentation on "Working Together for Traffic Solutions." It was his privilege to travel to Sacramento in January and present such a fine quality production to the Legislators to let them know what D.B., the Region and the Country need to get the problem fixed. It was his privilege to represent the City at the National League of Cities last weekend and be able to visit the offices of Senator Boxer, Senator Feinstein and Congressman Miller and pass along this information to let them know that this problem goes far beyond the City and affects the State and the Country as well. He felt that anyone who could do so should attend the Miss Diamond Bar Pageant. He hoped that he would see everyone at the Wine Soiree on Sunday and he offered to meet with residents on Saturday at "It's a Grind" at 1223 South Diamond Bar Boulevard about 9:00 a.m. M/Herrera congratulated tonight's award recipients and congratulated the Diamond Ranch High School Girls Basketball team on theirwonderful accomplishment. In the recent past the High School had no seniors and has now grown in power and strength. The School and its students do the City of D.B. proud! She congratulated the outgoing Commissioners and wished them success in their future ventures. She was in Washington D.C. last week and commented on Congressmen who felt that transportation issues are a "California problem." Part of the challenge is to convince them that what is happening in California affects the entire nation. Forty percent of the goods that travel by truck through the San Gabriel Valley travel through to the eastern region and as areas of California become blocked and clogged it affects the delivery of goods throughout the nation. Every minute, hour and day of delay costs money. With all of the inherent challenges, goods still move at a faster pace out of the Southern California ports than they do out of other regions. The San Gabriel Valley contingent visited Congressman David Drier who is key to making appropriations; the office of Senator Barbara Boxer is a great supporter of Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority which many in the east are calling a project of "national significance" because they understand that grade separation and rail crossing improvements move freight quicker and lessen the negative impact to air quality. The contingency also visited the office of Jim Tymon, staff member for Congressman Young. She also met with Arthur Chan, Highway Policy Director, for the Subcommittee on Highways, Transit and Pipelines House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and Bill Richard with the Office of Congressman Jim Oberstar. All of these individuals are key people who can influence the granting of monies to Southern California and its projects. D.B. is looking for money for the MARCH 21, 2006 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL 57160 interchange final fix and other four -corner improvements that will improve mobility and air quality for the ultimate benefit of the entire Country. She believed that the contingent created a positive impression. And said she was proud of staff for putting together the coalition and providing the tools to assist the coalition in its effort to obtain funding. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Herrera adjourned the Regular City Council meeting at 8:20 p.m. Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of , 2006. CAROL HERRERA, MAYOR Agenda No. 6.2 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 28, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Low called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Torng led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Dan Nolan, Tony Torng, Vice -Chairman Ruth Low. Absent: Chairman Joe McManus was excused. Also present. Nancy Fong, Interim Community Development Director; Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney; Ann Lungu, Associate Planner; Linda Smith, Development Services Associate and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCEIPUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 14, 2006. C/Nolan moved, CILee seconded, to approve the minutes of February 14, 2006 as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT 5. OLD BUSINESS: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None Nolan, Lee, Torng, VC/Low None Chair/McManus 9 FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 2 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: PLANNING COMMISSION 7.1 Development Review No. 2005-31 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-03 — In accordance with Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56, this was a request to construct a new three-story single family dwelling of approximately 9,288 square feet (including porches, balconies, covered Patios, swimming pool, tennis court and an attached six car garage) on an existing vacant 1.68 acre parcel in the R1 20,000 zone with a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential. The applicant also requested approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permitto allow a driveway width greater than fourteen (14) feet at the street property line. (Continued from February 14, 2006) Project Address: 2502 Razzak Circle (Lot 181, Tract 30578 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Mr. And Mrs. Wasif Siddique 11076 Venture Drive Mira Loma, CA 91752 Applicant. Bob Larivee 17 Rue Du Chateau Aliso Viejo, CA 92655 1CDD/Fong stated that once again the applicant failed to produce the necessary plans to allow staff the opportunity to forward this item to the Planning Commission and according to the city attorney this would be the last continuance allowed. If the plans are not received, this item will be pulled from future agendas and staff will re -advertise the public hearing as appropriate. C/Torng moved, C/Nolan seconded to continue this matter to March 14, 2006. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Torng, Nolan, Lee, VCILow NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Chair/McManus PUBLIC HEARINGS: 8.1 Development Review. No. 2006-06 — In accordance with Code Section 22.48, this was a request to construct a three story single-family FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION residence of approximately 7,360 gross square feet including the three car garage, Porte Cochere, terraces, balconies and deck. The request also included a play court, swimming pool/spa, and retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of eight feet. Project Address: 24141, Lodge Pole Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner/ Mr. and Mrs. Juzer Jangbarwala Applicant: 1441 Autumn Hill Lane Chino Hills, CA 91709 DSA/Smith presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2005-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. VC/Low asked if the covenant regarding the sewer would be attached to the draft resolution and DSA/Smith responded that it was a separate document that came from the Public Works prior to issuance of the building permit. VC/Low said it was nice to see a house within "The Country Estates" being presented without any Variances and Conditional Use Permits. VC/Low opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Low closed the public hearing. C/Nolan moved, C/Torng seconded to approve Development Review No. 2006-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Nolan, Torng, Lee, VC/Low NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Chair/McManus 8.2 Development Review No. 2006-04 Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-01 and Minor Variance No. 2006.01 — In accordance with Code Sections 22.48, 22.52, 22.56 and 22.68, this was a request to remodel and construct an approximate 1,683 gross square foot addition including porch, balcony/patio cover, storage room and garage to an existing 2,577 livable square foot two story single-family residence. A Minor Conditional Use Permit approval permits the continuation of legal non -conforming front and FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION side yard setbacks. The Minor Variance approval permits a decrease of the required setback/yard area for this irregularly shaped lot. Project Address: 22088 Cedardale Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Dr. Jacob Said 22088 Cedardale Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Khanjian Agop 2721 N. Michigan Avenue Pasadena, CA 91106 DSA/Smith presented staffs report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2006-04, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-01 and Minor Variance No. 2006-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. VC/Low asked if the material colors shown on the renderings were accurate for the remodel and DSA/Smith responded that they were accurate. C/Torng asked DSA/Smith to point out the location of the three-foot minor variance because he visited the site and felt that it was very tight. DSA/Smith showed C/Torng the area on the map and pointed out the location of the building and the variance in relationship to the lot. She also explained the setbacks that Diamond Bar inherited from Los Angeles County as they related to the current setback requirements. C/Torng hoped the applicant could improve the home's front views. VC/Low felt that the large amount of landscape materials tended to make the lot look more crowded than it would normally appear. C/Nolan felt that a three-foot section out of 55 feet was not unreasonable. The legal non -conforming is compelling because the house was originally built within the Los Angeles County Code and a new property owner should probably not be held to the new standards. VC/Low opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Low closed the public hearing. FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION CILee moved, C/Nolan seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2006-04, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-01 and MinorVariance No. 2006-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Lee, Nolan, Torng, VC/Low None Chair/McManus 8.3 Develo ment Review No. 2006-03 — In accordance with Code Section 22.48.020iati25 000 square feet on as a request to truct a o vacant lottory withm the ce building of approximately Gateway Corporate Center. Project Address: 21671 E. Diamond BareCenterway Drive CA 91765 Property Owner/ Dr. Acbar Omar Applicant: 222 N. Sunset Avenue West Covina, CA 91790 AssocPlLungu presented staffs report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2006-03 and Negative Declaration No. 2006-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. AssocPlLungu responded to ClTorng that the applicant met the traffic study requirements prior to issuance of the permits. C/Torng asked if there was a requirement for a contribution to art and AssocPlLungu responded not atthis time. AssocPlLungu confirmed to VC/Low that this application was completely revised as of the January 20, 2006, submission. C/Torng asked whether it was a two or three story building and ICDDIFong responded that it was a two-story office building. Because the building is situated on a slope and caissons are being used to build up the foundation it appears taller than other two-story buildings. Rwas done nderthe auspices of ICDDIFong a teed to Plan fLee that that wasthe apprlu the Gatewayy Master M approved by theCounty. The use is FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION allowed and a pad was provided in the plan. Accordingly, this is a Design Review of an office building within the Gateway Master Plan. C/Lee said he received this package on Friday, and that it was a large project and he felt he had not had sufficient time for review. ICDD/Fong responded to C/Lee that the Planning Commission approved this project in 2002. The reason the applicant came back to the Commission was that he was not vested into the project because they had not started construction. According to the city attorney the applicant must reapply. Since the project was previously approved staff did not tell the applicant to redesign the entire project so it is staffs objective to make certain that the current plans are consistent with the previous approval and the conditions of approval. AssocP/Lungu responded to VC/Low that there were no substantial or material changes from the prior submission. Dr. Omar stated that his project was approved and all of the permits were pulled. The entitlement required that sufficient grading should have been done. He misunderstood the amount of grading that was required and thought it had been done in accordance with the requirements. The contracts are signed and the contractors are prepared to proceed with construction. C/Torng asked if art was included in this project. VC/Low asked Dr. Omar if he was willing to place a piece of art in the public area of his building and Dr. Omar said that he would take it under consideration because it would be a good addition to his structure. ACA/Kovacevich cautioned the Commissioners that they could not condition the project in this manner. He noted, however, that the applicant had offered to consider the option within this public forum. VC/Low thanked Dr. Omar for his consideration. VC/Low opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Low closed the public hearing. C/Torng moved, C/Lee seconded to approve Development Review No. 2006-03, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION AYES: Commissioners: Torng, Nolan, Lee, VC/Low NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Chair/McManus 9. PLANNING COMMSSIONER COMMENTSIINFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Nolan said that this would be his last Planning Commission meeting. He served on the Commission fouryears and on the Parks and Recreation Commission forthe two prior years. He has enjoyed his service on the Commission and has enjoyed working with staff and Paul Wright. He attended the Sycamore Canyon Trailhead ribbon -cutting ceremonies and eel that dellit e Sas a greatprojproject. One of his goals for the City is to work on the Lorb CILee strongly believed that retaining walls were one of the most important elements in a residential project. He proposed that for any residential proposals containing retaining walls the applicant should be required to submit retaining wall cross-section elevation plans like those � Was aere s mpleuded in d drawinghe thatlrst project contained presented this evening. He said sufficient information to assist him in evaluating projects. VC/Low said that she had truly enjoyed working with C/Nolan who had been very helpful to her. She appreciated his insight and hard work. She learned a lot from him and he had been a great inspiration to her. She believed that this would be her last Planning Commission meeting as well and said she had enjoyed every meeting over the past two years. She hoped that the Planning Commission would continue to do good things for the City. 10. STAFF COMMENTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. ICDD/Fong said she understood C/Lee's request for sufficient information to properly evaluate the application hene eand rthere were retaining walls within a phat staff would make roject in to include sufficient cross se area. ICDDIFong stated that the Planning Commission would receive a report from staff on reconsideration of Scribble's Conditional Use Permit for review, modification or possible revocation. The sheriffs concerns and required as alerted staff a considerable to several amount of sheincidents that have caused safety caoff's department resources to address the situation. FEBRUARY 28, 2006 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION TCDD/Fong presented plaques to C/Nolan and VC/Low and thanked them for their service on the Planning Commission and to the City. She appreciated the their commitment and felt they were very fair and professional in their deliberations. She thanked C/Nolan and VC/Low for their hard work toward making Diamond Bar a better place. VC/Low thanked TCDD/Fong and her staff for their hard work and dedication to the City. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, AC/Low adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Nancy ong Interim Communit opment Director ,�66M—L cManus, Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Agenda No. 6.3 MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION HEARING BOARD ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D.ITHE GOVERNMENT CENTER 21865 Copley Drive FEBRUARY 23, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Nancy Lyons called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the SCAQMD1Government Center Building Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Chang led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Nancy Lyons, Vice Chairman Dave Grundy and Commissioners Lin -Ling Chang, Benny Liang and Ted Owens. Staff Present: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services; Anthony Jordan, Parks and Maintenance Superintendent; Sara West, Recreation Services Manager and Marisa Somenzi, Senior Administrative Assistant. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None Offered. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As Listed in the Agenda and reported by CSD/Rose. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.1 Approval of Minutes of January 26, 2006 Regular Meeting. VC/Grundy moved, C/Owens seconded to approve the minutes of the January 26, 2006 meeting. Without objection, the motion was so ordered with ClChang and C/Liang abstaining. 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 2.1 Recreation Program Report — RSMNVest 2.2 Diamond Bar Community Foundation Oral Report — ClChang reported that the Foundation was meeting quarterly and the next meeting was scheduled for March 9. 2.3 Youth Master Plan Oral Report — CSD/Rose reported that RS/Meyers would attend the March 23 Commission meeting to provide an update on plans for the dance and other upcoming events. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Lyons that the dance would be open to middle school attendees whether or not they lived outside of D.B. FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION Chair/Lyons asked CSD/Rose to have RS/Meyers let her know when she had scheduled the meeting with Greg Plekto. 2.4 Parks Report — PMS/Jordan presented staffs report for February including a recap of the more significant park projects. PMS/Jordan responded to Chair/Lyons that the painting projects at Sycamore Canyon Park would be completed by Saturday and the graffiti has been eradicated. Chair/Lyons pointed out that the Sycamore Canyon Park and the new trail are already getting heavy use. VC/Grundy asked how the park contracts were progressing. CSD/Rose responded that in his opinion, both Valley Crest and TruGreen were doing a very good job. In fact, staff moved maintenance for Summitridge Mini -Park from Valley Crest back to TruGreen to save dollars and TruGreen is doing quality work. The City has no plans to move any of the other parks away from Valley Crest. PMS/Jordan said that in general the contractors were doing much better. Chair/Lyons encouraged Commissioners to complete the balance of the park walk-throughs. 2.5 CIP Program Report— CSD/Rose a. Trail and Trail Head Development at Sycamore Canyon Park —CSD/Rose reported that the electricity was to have been turned on today and after tonight's meeting he will drive the area to see if the streetlights are on and Edison will fill in the streetlight footings when itfits into their calendar. b. Sycamore Canyon Park ADA Retrofit — Phase III — CSD/Rose reported that the first plan check was completed and that Hirsch & Associates was making the necessary plan corrections and would be back to the City for final plan check so that the City can go out to bid, select a contractor and commence construction. On February 21 staff indicated to Council that 10 sycamore trees would be removed as part of this project and nine additional sycamore trees would be removed due to health concerns. The trees will be replaced with 25 - 24" box London Plane trees. Lorbeer Ball Field -- Artificial Turf/Restrooms — CSD/Rose said that it had been about three months since the City wrote to Pomona Unified School District asking to discuss this project. Staff has been talking about a joint use agreement for the facility since 1999 and staff believes it is time to move to Plan B so this matter was scheduled for the March 7 City Council Study Session in order to present project alternatives for consideration. VC/Grundy asked if staff considered asking the Parks & Recreation Commission to join with the City Council for their study session. He was FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 3 P&R COMMISSION somewhat surprised that the matter would go directly to the Council without the Commission first considering possible options. CSD/Rose said that this was an approved budgeted project item and the City Council needed to first be alerted to the issues with Lorbeer and why staff was seeking alternatives. The City Council could ask that the matter be brought back to the Parks & Recreation Commission for study and recommendation. The study session is a public meeting and Commissioners are welcome to participate. CSD/Rose explained to C/Owens that the City has a joint use agreement for the ball field lights and for the overall facilities. Staff has been attempting to get a joint use agreement for the operation of the lighted field at Lorbeer and at this point the City is paying for the electrical without a formal agreement. Chair/Lyons asked for public input Richard Dixon, President, Diamond Bar Little League, said he was open to a joint use agreement for use of the Little League facility. VC/Grundy said he previously heard this offered as an alternative and went on record to indicate that he was ready to consider alternatives. He appreciate that the Little League was willing to participate in a way that would benefit all parties. Dan Maloney, President, Diamond Bar Pop Warner, said that it was frustrating to parents that kids had to play outside of their community and Lorbeer would be an ideal location. If Lorbeer was not available the City needed a sports complex. This is an active community for the kids and the City needs a quality program to accommodate them. He would prefer not to give up on Lorbeer because it is a prime location. C/Chang suggested that both groups gather a large contingency to attend the PUSD school board meeting because this item was on the agenda. Mr. Maloney indicated to Chair/Lyons that Pop Warner could practice at Lorbeer and that actual games would be played on a real football field. He currently practices at Lorbeer but when he has eight teams and 250 kids Lorbeer does not have the capacity. They also practice at Summitridge but the park is not designed for that type of use. The Diamond Bar Center is very busy and people are vying for parking spots. He has to have all of the teams together for practice in one location. He said he could probably double the number of teams if he had the proper practice location. C/Owens asked Mr. Maloney if he had found it necessary to limit registration due to lack adequate facilities and Mr. Maloney said not to date. However, he expected to double in size this year and may have to limit registration. FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 4 P&R COMMISSION Mr. Maloney responded to VC/Grundy that he had received 63 calls from parents who intended to leave the D.B./Walnut Junior All American group for the Pop Warner program. C/Owens asked if any of the other groups had to cut registration and CSD/Rose said that he knew only about the City's programs — basketball and soccer. He was not aware of any of the organizations having to scale back or turn people away. Art Sebastian, Head Coach, D.B. Pop Warner said he was also a D.B. Little League manager and had been associated with both groups for about five years. He said he was present to support his colleagues and wanted the Commission to know that he felt sports was a priority for the kids. Anything that could be done to support these groups would be gratefully accepted. d. Paul C. Grow Park ADA Retrofit — CSD/Rose reported that the conceptual plan was forwarded to the LA County CDC for about $98,000 in improvements. There are other items that do not qualify for CDBC funds and those items will be presented to the City Council as part of the FY 2006107 budget process. e. Design of Restroom/Storage Building at Pantera Park— CSD/Rose stated that RJM Design Group provided a conceptual plan and were working on refinements. The project is moving forward. CSD/Rose acknowledged to VC/Grundy that AYSO offered about $7500 toward the cost of the building. f. Design of Trail Access Points — CSD/Rose indicated that staff meets with Group Delta next week to go over the conceptual plan. The new trail head at Sycamore Canyon Park at Diamond Bar Blvd is the connection point for trails that ultimately go up to the Diamond Bar Center. a. OLD BUSINESS: 3.1 Draft Athletic Facilities Use and Allocation Policies and Procedures. RSM/West presented staff's report and requested that the Commission present their questions to staff, comment on the proposed revisions and determine whether additional review time was necessary and whether a study session would be required for further review of the document. VC/Grundy felt the changes were extensive. RSM/West agreed and said the primary changes had to do with language for the facilities use policy so they would be consistent with those used at the Diamond Bar Center. VC/Grundy felt he needed more time to study the document. C/Owens said that at the last meeting he asked that the document contain a definition of "D.B. resident." RSM/West said that D.B. defines resident as FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 5 P&R COMMISSION "living in the City." Non-residents or those who different rental rate. C/Owens reiterated that the should be clearly stated within the document. work in the City pay a classification definition Chair/Lyons asked if Page 22, Group C had always read that government agencies are above D.B. based non-profit service organizations and CSD/Rose explained that it was included in the fourth revision of the initial D.B. Center policy. Chair/Lyons said she strongly felt that each resident non-profit organization should be allowed one fundraising event per calendar year where room fees were waived (Page 3 and Page 26) to bolster their organizations. CSD/Rose responded that the provision was eliminated due to lack of use. When Heritage first opened it was a popular item and all organizations conducted an annual fundraiser. Non-profit organizations seem to have no issues with the fee. Chair/Lyons said she understood charging for the D.B. Center but not allowing the groups free use of Heritage or Pantera did not seem appropriate to her. Chair/Lyons asked what year the current facility rental rate was determined. CSD/Rose responded that the resolution covering the fees was Resolution No. 93-67A meaning it had been changed only once since 1993. C/Owens asked if it was the City's goal to recoup 100 percent of the facilities cost. CSD/Rose responded that it depended on the use. For example, there was no effort toward 100 percent recovery from the senior groups. Chair/Lyons felt that with respect to Page 4 "the total number of member participants is not less than 60 percent D.B. residents" that the suggestion from Marty Torres was good in that it would allow the organization to account for the numbers to save additional staff time. Chair/Lyons asked if Tennis Anyone was still operating in D.B. and CSD/Rose responded affirmatively. Tennis Anyone contracts with the City and the City is paid from its revenues. CSD/Rose pointed out that the biggest change was on Page 5, b. Picnic Facilities. Currently there is no rental fee for the use of picnic facilities. Staff is again recommending a $25 fee for residents and a $50 fee for non- residents (currently $25 fee for non-residents). The last time this recommendation was before the Council it rejected the fee for residents. However, staff believes that there should be a fee charged for use to cover maintenance — cleanup and setup for the next user. VC/Grundy said he would like time to study the document between now and the next meeting and he could not predict whether he would have very many questions. However he felt a study session was unnecessary. C/Owens said he too did not feel he needed a study session and recommended that all user groups be given a copy of the document for FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 6 P&R COMMISSION discussion and input. CSD/Rose said that RS/Wright's portion had been emailed to the user groups and that they would be invited to the next Parks and Recreation Commission meeting; and that staff had received positive feedback and additional recommendations from the User groups. C/Liang said he needed time to study the document and also feitthat a study session was not necessary. 4. NEW BUSINESS: None 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS- CSD/ Rose recognized Chair/Lyons and ClChang fortheir hard work and support to the community over the years and wished them good luck in their new assignments. VC/Grundy thanked his colleagues for their help, participation, comments and input and that it had been good to work with ClChang and Chair/Lyons. He wished them good luck in their new ventures. VC/Grundy complimented staff on the trailhead and said staff should feel very proud of their efforts on behalf of the City. He hoped it would be a great opening on Saturday. ClLiang said it was a great pleasure and privilege for him to work with ClChang and Chair/Lyons. He hoped that his colleagues would be able to work toward positive change in their new positions with the school board and water board. He wished ClChang and Chair/Lyons good luck and said he would miss their being on the Commission. C/Owens thanked ClChang and Chair/Lyons for welcoming him to the Commission and for their support. He said they both had his vote of confidence and knew that they would do well in their new positions. ClChang said it had been a lot of fun serving on the Parks and Recreation Commission with such a great and supportive staff. She thanked everyone for making it a very positive experience for her. It was always a joy for her to be able to brag about the D.B. staff when she visited other cities. She said she would definitely miss serving on the Commission. Chair/Lyons announced that Bob Huff selected ClChang as Woman of the Yearfor his district. She felt that it was a well-deserved honor. She said that she had truly enjoyed working on the Parks and Recreation Commission and that it was a lot of fun with a lot of good times and a number of accomplishments during recent months. The parks are looking better and the street beautification project is a real step up compared to how things were a few years ago. In addition, staff instituted the sportsmanship code that was unique to the City and very good for the participants. As good as the Commissioners are they are aware that most of the real work is done by staff and the D.B. staff led by CSD/Rose is very good and has stuck by her through thick and thin. She said she had a lot of respect for the way new programs had been brought into the City and how staff was able to keep the FEBRUARY 23, 2006 PAGE 7 P&R COMMISSION casts in line. She will miss the Commission and she will be back to participate. She felt she had learned a lot in her service as Commissioner and especially as Chairman of the Commission. ADJOURNMENT: Upon motion by C/Chang, seconded by C/Owens and with no further business before the Parks & Recreation Commission, Chair/Lyons adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Bob Rose, Secretary Attest: Nancy Lyons, Chairman Agenda # Meeting Date: April 6, 2006 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <:. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager,. TITLE: Ratification of Check Register dated March 17, 2006 through March 30, 2006 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Check Register containing checks dated March 17, 2006 through March 30, 2006 totaling $1,017,835.36. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $1,017,835.36 in City funds. BACKGROUND: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting. DISCUSSION: The attached check register containing checks dated March 17, 2006 through March 30, 2006 for $1,017,835.36 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director, PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Finance Director REVIEWED BY: 4ql�L "kctor u ashFnanc Assistant City Manager Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register — 03/17/06 through 03/30/06 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT The attached listing of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register including checks dated March 17, 2006 through March 30, 2006 has been audited and is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these amounts: Fund # Description 001 General Fund 112 Prop A - Transit Fund 115 Int. Waste Mgt Fund 118 AB2766 - AQMD Fund 125 CDBG Fund 138 LLAD #38 Fund 139 LLAD #39 Fund 141 LLAD #41 Fund 250 Capital Improvement Project Fund 510 Self Insurance Fund Signed: Linda G, Magnuson Finance Director Amount $902,460.68 33,125.99 5,866.65 2,860.61 19,841.92 11,173.87 11,979.20 4,678.55 24,621.89 1,226.00 $1,017,835.36 ��w�nnli ehATAMATION INC FUND ACCOUNTING DATE 03/31 /06 T,ME: 09:21:21 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 1 SELECTION CRITERIA:kransact.trans_date>'20066315 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/Q6 00:00:00.0' and trans act.ck_date>`200b0316 0 :00:00.0 FUND - 001 - GENERAL, FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE LST ----------- 10100 69954 -VENDOR---------____ 03/17/06 MMARRIOT FU1VD/DIVISION - - SALES TAX AMOUN'P MONTEREY MARRIOTT--DESCRIPTION-- 0015210 10100 69955 03/17/06 WRIGHTP PAUL PLNG COMM -03/22-24/C6 0.00 528.27 10100 69956 WRIGHT 03/23/06 ACTGISIN 0014090 A!V SVCS -P/C, CNCL MTG 0.00 490.00 10100 10100 69956 69956 ACT GIS INC 03/23/06 ACTGISIN ACT GIS INC 0014070 GIS CONSULTING SVCS -FE TOTAL CHECK 03/23;06 ACTGISIN ACT GIS INC 0014070 GIS CONSULTING SVCS FE 0.00 0.00 3120.00 0014070 GIS CONSULTING SVCS -14A O.pO 1267.50 10100 69957 03/23/06 ADRLPHIA ADELPHIA 0-00 4452.50 8840.00 10100 69958 03/23/06 ALTAIRTE ALTAIR 0014010 MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL 0'00 46.95 10100 69959 TECHNOLOGIES LTD 0014070 SOFTWARE MAINT�INFO Sy 0.00 03/23/06 ARCHANGE ARCHANGEL PRINTING 0015350 39.80 10100 69960 03/23/66 13ASHFORD BASHFORD SUPPLIES -STAFF T-SHIRT 0.00 800.00 10100 69961 ENTERPRISES 03/23/06 1255215 HIP PROD -366 CARPIO DR 0.00 13246.20 BASRAISH SHABBIR BASRAI 001 10100 69962 03/23/pb BENESYST BENESYST PK REFUND -DBC 27196 0.00 100.00 10100 69963 03/23/06 BOORMANR ROY 001 3/24/06-P/R DEDUCTIONS 537.67 10100 69964 BOORMAN0-00 03/23/06 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 BURNESCA CAROLE J BURNES 0015350 180.00 10100 69965 63/23/06 BURTGLOR GLORIA PETTING ZOO -CITY B/DAY 0.00 1300.00 10100 69966 BURT 03/23/06 CALPROTE 001 RECREATION REFUND 0'00 65-00 10100 10100 69966 69966 CAL PROTECTION FIRE SAFE 03/23/06 CALPROTE CAL PROTECTION FIRE 0015333 INSPECTION -ALARM Di3C 10100 69966 SAFE 03/23/06 CALPROTE CAL PROTECTION FIRE SAFE 03/23/06 0015340 0015333 INSPECTION -ALARM HERtT 0.00 0.00 730.00 10100 TOTAL 69966 CALPROTE CAL PROTECTION FIRE SAFE 03/23/06 CALPROTE CAL 0015340 INSPECTION -SPRINKLER INSPECTION 0.00 300.00 950.00 CHECK PROTECTION EIRE SAFE 0015333 -SPANKER fiR INSPECTION 0'00 480.00 10100 -DBC 0.00 315.00 69967 03/23/06 CARRAM$E AMBER CARRILLO 0.00 2775.00 10100 69968 03/23/06 CARRILLO SANDRA CARRILLO 001 PK REFFUND-DBC 278 0.00 299 00 10100 69969 03/23/06 CATABALL CATALINA 001 PK REFUND -DBC 24988 0.00 100.00 10100 69970 BALLAST BULB CO 0015340 SUPPLIES -HERITAGE PK D,00 10100 69970 D3/23/06 CDW-G CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 03/23/06 CDW-G 0014070 87.68 TOTAL CftECK CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 0014070 SUPPLIES -INFO SYS 0.00 2372.62 OFFICE E EQ -INFO SYS 0.00 82.15 10100 69971 03/23/06 CENTERIC CENTER ICE SKATING ARENA 0015350 0.00 2454.77 10100 69972 03/23/06 CHEMSEAR CHEMSEARCH CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0-00 24.00 0015333 SUPPLIES -DBC 0.00 197.53 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTAM7,TION INC - I'UND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03/31/06 IME: 09:21:21 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE IT"IBER: 2 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA:.] SELECTION CRITERIA: tra:Isact,trans_date>'2006i}315 00:00:00.0' and ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 t.ransac`.ck_date>'20060316 0000,00.0' FUND - 001 - GENER::L FUND CASH ACCT CHECK 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL CHECK NO 69973 69974 69975 69976 69976 ISSUE DT --------- ---- VENDOR ------------- 03/23/06 CORTEZER ERNIE CORTEZ 03/23/06 COUNTYOF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 03/23/06 DAYNITEC DAY & NITE COPY CENTER 03/23/06 DELGADON NADIR DELGADO 03/23/06 DELGADON NADIR DELGADO FUND/DIVISION--- 001 001 0015350 001 001 DESCRIPTICN--- - PK REFUND -DBC 24376 SLRY ATTCHMT-DN95994 PRINT SVCS-RECY,EA'PION PK REFUND -DBC 27770 PK REFUND -DBC 27770 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 AMOUNT 400.00 407.36 332,$7 500.00 -28,00 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL CHECK 69977 69978 69978 03/23/06 DENNISCA CAROL DENNIS 03/23/06 DESPORGE KEN DESFORGES 03/23/06 DESFORGE KEN DESPORGES 0015510 0014070 0014070 PROF.SVCS-T&T MTG REIMB-SUPPLIES INFO 5 REIMB-SOFTWARE INFO S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 472.00 175.00 64-59 401.84 ]-0140 TOTAL TOTAL CHECK 69979 69979 03/23/06 DHMAINTE DH MAINTENANCE 03/23/06 DHMAINTE DH MAINTENANCE 0015333 0015340 JANITORIAL SVCS -MAR p6 JANITORIAL SVCS -PARKS 0,00 0.00 0.00 466.43 12006.50 725.00 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL CHECK 69980 69980 69980 03/23/06 DBHANDCA DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WAS 03/23/06 DBHANDCA DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WAS 03/23/06 DBHANDCA DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WAS 0014090 0015230 001.5350 CAR WASH -POOL VEH CAR WASH-NGHBRHV IMP CAR WASH -COMM SVCS 0'00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12731.50 25.00 31 96 28.97 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL CHECK 101000.00 10100 TOTAL CHECK 69981 69982 69983 69984 69984 69985 69985 03/23/06 DBIA DIAMOND BAR IMPROVEMENT 03/23/06 DIVERSIF DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSI`P 03/23/06 DIVEWIND DIVERSIFIED WINDOW COVER 03/23/06 DEWANLUN DMS CONSULTANTS 03/23/06 DEWANLUN DMS CONSULTANTS 03/23/06 DRIVERAL DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE 03/23/06 DRIVERAL DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE 0014095 1125350 0015333 2505510 0015554 5104081 5104081 MONTHLY AD -MAR EASTE SHUTTLE SVCS -TRAIL HEA SUPPLIES -DBC DESIGN SVCS -GRAND AVE DRAIN IMPVMNT-AMBUSHER CRIME BOND RENEWAL CRIME BOND RENEWAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 85.93 450. 00 338.32 124,92 $150.00 4950.00 13100.00 320.00 906.00 10100 14100 10100 10100 TOTAL CHECK 10100 69986 69987 69988 69988 69989 03/23/06 ELITEDEV ELITE DEVELOPMENT GROUP 03/23/06 EXTERIOR EXTERIOR PRODUCTS INC 03/23/06 EXTERMIN EXTERMINETICS OF SO CAL 03/23/06 EXTERMIN EXTERMINETICS OE SO CAL 03/23/06 FLORESTI TINA FLORES 0014070 0015350 0015333 0015333 001 SYS MAINT-SOFTWARE INSTALL/REMOVAL-BANNER PEST CONTROL -DBC FE RODENT CONTRL-DBC F PK REFUND -DBC 2739 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1226.00 692.80 4699.00 75.00 40.00 115.00 500,00 RUN DATE 03/31!06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC -- FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD P�-:NTAMATION INC - FUND A(COUNTING DATE: 03/31/06 TIME: 09:'1:21 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 3 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND A('CTPA21 SELECTTUN CRITERIA: transact. trans_date>'2)060315 00:00:00.0' and ACCOUNTING: PERIOD: 9/06 ttransact.ck_dae>J_ 'G)60316 00:00:00.0' FUND 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH 10100 TOTAL ACCT CHECK NO 69989 CHECK ISSUE DT -------------- VENDOR ----------- 03/23/06 FI,ORESTI TINA FLORES - FTJND/DIVISION 001 -----DESCRIPTION------ PK REFUND -DSC 273 SALES TAX 0.00 AMOUNT -258.00 10100 10100 10100 10100 10.100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL 69990 69991 69992 69993 69994 69995 69996 69997 69998 69998 CHECK 03/23/06 GARCIAJO JORGE GARCIA 03/23/06 GOODRICO GOODRICH CO INC 03/23/06 GOVIS GOVIS LLC 03/23/06 GOVPARTN GOVPARTNER 03/23/06 GRANDMOB GRAND MOBIL 03/23/06 HEWLETTP HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY 03/23/06 HWALIMSU LIM SU HWA 03/23/06 INFL2000 INFLATABLE 2000 INC 03/23/06 INLANDEM INLAND EMPIRE STAGES 03/23/06 INLANDEM INLAND EMPIRE STAGES 0015554 1255215 1125553 1185098 0015310 0014070 001 0015350 0015350 1125350 REIMS -SUPPLIES ROAD MA HIP PROG-632 FARGEN DR SOFTWARE -TRANSIT REQUEST PARTNER SVCS -M MAINTCOMMSVCS VEH REPLACE SERVER -INFO SY REFUND -TSR 05-25 GAMES -CITY B/DAY CELEB EXCURSION-REAGAN LIBRA TRANSPORTATION-EXCRSN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 242.00 274-75 4500.00 562.50 850.00 340,51 13704.53 100.00 4999.90 1404.00 767.00 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL 69999 70000 70001 70002 70003 70004 70004 CHECK 03/23/06 INLANDRO INLAND ROUNDBALL OFFICIA 03/23/P6 JORDANAN ANTHONY JORDAN 03/23/06 KE.NSHARD KENS HARDWARE 03/23/06 LANDAMER LANDAMERICA GATEWAY TITL 03/23/06 LANDSEND LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTF 03/23/06 LEADTFCH LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 03/23/06 LEADTECH LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 0015350 0015310 0015554 1255215 0015554 1255215 1255215 OFFICIAL, SVCS-FEB/MAR REIMB-SUPPLIES SUPPLIES-ROAp MAINT HIP PROG-20902 MOONLAK SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT HIP PRflG-310 BALEEN DR HIP PROG-31.0 BALLENA D 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 2171.00 2145.00 270.61 9,72 9.00 263.64 275.00 475.00 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 i0100 10100 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 70005 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, I 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 1 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, I 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 1 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, I 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, I 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 1 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 1001 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, I 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 1 03/23/06 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, I 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 ADMIN FEE -EN 03-397 ADMIN FEE -EN 03-397 ADMIN F'EE-EN 04-422 ADMIN FEE -EN 04-422 ADMIN FEE -EN 05-503 ADMIN FEE -EN 05-503 ADMIN FEE -EN 04-449 ADMIN VCS -EN 04-422 PROF.SVCS EN 04-422 PROF -SVCS -EN 05-503 PROF.SVCS-EN 03-397 0-00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 fl.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 750.00 73.35 -73.35 75.15 -75.15 71.20 -71.20 60.20 -6D.20 417.50 395.53 407.50 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTAMA';ION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03/31/06 TIME: 09:27:21 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: y CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21 SELECTION CR_TERIA: transact.trans-datc>'20060315 00:00:00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 .0' and transact.ck t3ate>'2r06C-376 OO:OO:OO.D' FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH 10100 TOTAL ACCT CHECK NO 7D005 CHECK ISSUE DT --------------- VENDOR ------------- 03/23/D6 LEIGHTON LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, FUND/DIVISION 1001 DESCRIPTION-- -- PROF.SVCS-EN 04-449 SALES TAX 0.00 AMOUN'i' 334.4E 10100 70006 10100 70007 10100 70008 10100 70009 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 10100 70010 TOTAL CHECK 1 0100 70011 10100 70012 10100 70013 10100 70014 10100 70015 10100 70016 10100 70017 10100 70018 10100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 i0100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 10100 70019 LIUCELIN CELINE LIU 001 03/23/06 LIVESCUN LIVESOUND CONCEPTS 0015350 03/23/06 LACDA LOS ANGELES COUNTY DIST, 001 03/23/06 LAUSC LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SOHO 0014060 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015333 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015340 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015340 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015340 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015340 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015320 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015340 03/23/06 LOWES LOWE'S 0015333 0015340 03/23/06 MAGSCOPO MAGICOPLOLIS 0015350 03/23/06 MARTSONI SONJA MARTINET, 001 03/23/06 MISAC MISAC 1185098 03/23/06 MOBILERE MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES 0014440 03/23/06 MUNOZMON MONICA MUNOT, 001 03/23/06 NORRISRE NORRIS REPKE INC 0015510 03/23/06 NRSINC NRS INC. 0015333 03/23/06 NUGUESHE HEATHER NUQUES 0015350 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0014030 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0014090 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0014090 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFZCEMAX CONTRACT INC 0014090 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0015210 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0015333 03/23/06 OFFTCEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0015333 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0015350 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0015510 03/23/06 OFFICEMA OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC 0014095 RECREATION REFUND SOUND SYS -CITY B/DAY SLAY ATTCHMT-BY0426064 BILINGUAL SVCS-H/R SUPPLIES -DBC SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -DBC SUPPLIES -PARKS EXCURSION-MAGICOPOLIS RECREATION REFUND TANG -SQL SERVER I AZ REPEATER SVCS-JAN/FEB PK REFUND -DBC 27748 CONSULTANT SVCS -FEB 06 CHAIRS -DBC STAFF CONTRACT CLASS-WTNTE'R SUPPLIES -CITY MANAGER SUPPLIES -GENERAL SUPPLIES -GENERAL SUPPLIES -GENERAL SUPPLIES -DBC SUPPLIES -DBC SUPPLIES -DBC SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS SUPPLIES-P/WORKS SUPPLIES -PUBLIC INFO 4.00 0...00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 fl.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1554-10100 31.00 690.00 307.82 80.00 99.41 378.03 178.90 235.97 14.64 442.46 24, g' .114.18 114.19 1602.45 500.00 b0. 00 440.00 78,75 500.00 4964.00 1834.84 60.00 30.74 13.22 356.14 390.57 119.97 45.32 25.95 56.16 7.38 96.53 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTA14ATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUAGAR'J PENTAMATION INC FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03/31/06 TI',IE: 09:21:21 CITY OF DI ',MOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 5 CPECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21 SE_,ECTION CRITERIA: transact.Lrans_date>'2G.760315 00:00:00.0' and ._ransacL.-k_date>'2006037.6 00X00:00.0' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9106 FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK. NO I5SUE DT ----_ TO'�AL CHECK -- - - ---VENDOR------------- FUND/DIVISION -- -----DESCRIPTION--- - SALES TAX AMOUNT 10100 70020 03/23/06 OGATAROX ROXANA OGATA 0-00 1.141.98 1o10a 70021 03/23/06 PANMELOD MELODY 001 PK REFUND -DBC. 2758 Q.00 sao.Do 10100 7002203/23/Q6 PAN 001 RECREATION REF[_TND 0.00 30.00 PATELSET SETAL PATEL 001 10100 1p100 70023 03/23/06 PERSHEAL PERS HEALTH PK REFUND -DBC 26367 x.00 600.00 10100 70023 70023 03/23/06 PERSHEAL PERS HEALTH 03/2.3/p6 D01 0014090 APR 06 -HEALTH INS PREM 0,00 21065.57 10100 70023 PERSHEAL PERS HEALTH 03/23/06 PERSHEAL PERS 0014060 APR 06-HFALTIi INS PREM APR 06 -HEALTH 0.00 170.20 TOTAL CHECK HEALTH 0014095 INS PREM APR 06 -HEALTH INS 0.00 70.23 PREM 0.00 979.03 10100 10100 70024 70024 03/23/06 PERSRETI PERS RETIREMENT FUND 03/23/06 001 0.00 22244.03 10100 70024 PERSRETI PERS RETIREMENT FUND 03/23/06 PERSRETI PERS 001 RETIRE CONTRIB-ER RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 0.00 17417.06 TOTAL CHECK RETIREMENT FUND 001 SURVIVOR BENEFIT 0,00 7168.96 10100 10100 70025 70025 03/23/06 PERSRETI PERS RETIREMENT FUND 001 0.00 0'00 3 9.99 18626.01 103.00 70025 03/23/06 PERSRETI PERS RETIREMENT FUND 03/7,3/06 007_ RETIRE CONTRIB-ER 0'00 332.66 TOTAL CHECK PERSRETI PERS RETIREMENT FUND ODI RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 0'00 2x8.88 SURVIVOR BENEFIT 0.00 8,00 10300 70026 03/23/06 PHOTOART PHOTO ART INDUSTRIES 0-00 549.54 10100 70027 03/23/06 PITNEYBO 0014010 PRINT SVCS -COUNCIL 0,06 455.78 10100 70028 PITNEY BOWES INC. 0014090 POSTAGE EQ RENTAL -JAN/ 0.00 03/23/06 PRECISIO PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPO 0015350 204.59 10100SUPPLIES-COMM 70029 03/?3/06 PSI SVCS 0.00 261.97 10100 10100 70029 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUS 03/23/06 PSI p ROTECTION SERVICE 0015340 ALARM SVCS-SYC CYN PK TOTAL CHECK 70029 03/23/06 PSS INDUS PROTECTION SERVICE INDUS 0015340 0015340 ALARM SVCS -HERITAGE PK 0.0p Q OO 92 58 82 23 ALARM SVCS -DBC 0.00 10100 70030 03/23/06 R&DBLUE R & D BLUEPRINT 0.00 s0. 00 224-81 I0100 70031 63/23/06 RFDICKSO 2505510 PRINT SVCS-P/WORKS 0.00 19.68 TOTAL TOTAL CHECK 70031 R F DICKSON COMPANY 03/23/06 RFDICKSO R F DICKSON COMPANY 0015554 ST SWEEPING SVCS -FEB 0 0.00 17.55515 DEBRIS DIVERSION SVCS- 0.00 9323.44 10100 10100 70032 03/23/06 REPUBLIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 0.00 2920.23 12243.67 TOTAL CHECK 70032 03/23/06 REPUBLIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 0015554 0015554 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-F 0.00 3108.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-F 0.00 10100 10100 70033 70033 03/23/06 RJMDESIG RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 2505310 0.00 3661.44 6769.44 TOTAL CHECK 03/23/06 RJMDESIG RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 2505$10 PARK IMPVMT-PANTERA 0.00 2275.77 CITY ENTRY IMPRVMNTS 0,00 2275.76 0.00 4551.53 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTAMA-ION INC - FUND ACCOUNT -NG DATE: 0-/31/06 TIME: 0L:21:21 CITY (F DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER - bI ;BURSEMENT FUND ACCOUNTING PERI��D: 9/06 SELECTION CRITF,f'Dtransact.trans_dat->'2006.1315 OO:QO:On.O' and transact_ck_date>'2006G.316 00:00:00.0' PAG-; NUMBER: 6 ACC!PA21 FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ----- ---- - -VENDOR-------- ---_ FUND/DIVISION ----- DESCRIPTION ------ SALES' 10100 70034 03/23/06 SCS.IG%S S C TAX AMOUNT 10100 SIGNS & SUPPLIE;_ LLC 0015554 SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT 70035 03/23/06 SGVCG SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNC 0015510 0.00 687.39 10100 70f36 03/23/06 SCHOC11RA RALPH TAC MTG-LIU/GOMEZ 0.00 50.00 10100 70037 03/23/06 SHORT' SCHOCH Opl REFUND -EN 05-487 0.00 223.00 10100 70038 ER JERRY SHORT 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 1341.60 10100 70Q38 03/23/06 SCE 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS 10100 10100 70')38 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 -TRAFFIC CON ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 93,67 10100 70038 70038 03/23/06 SCE 03/23/06 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 001.5510 EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 0.00 100.84 56.78 10100 70038 SCE 03/23/66 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 58.20 10100 70038 SCE 03/23/06 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 65.62 10100 7p[38 SCE 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDIS ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC` CON ELECT 0.00 70.60 10140 70038 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 SVCS -TRAFFIC CON ELECT SVCS 0.00 37.21 14104 70038 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 1385538 -TRAFFIC CON ELECT SVCS 0.00 59.09 10100 10100 70038 03/23/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 1415541 -DIST 38 ELECT SVCS -DIST 41 0.00 12.96 10100 70038 70038 03/23/06 SCE 03/23/06 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015333 EDIS 1385538 ELECT SVCS -DBC 0.00 0.00 14.19 5522.96 TOTAL CHECK SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 1385538 ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 0.00 12.47 ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 0.00 37.84 10100 10100 70039 70039 03/23/06 SCGAS 03/23/06 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 0015340 0.00 b143.23 TOTAL CHECK SCGAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 0015333 GAS SVCS -HERITAGE PK O.Op 231.08 GAS SVCS -DBC 0.00 2434.69 10100 704400.00 03/23/06 SPORTPIN SPORT PINS INTERNATIONAL 0014095 2665.77 10100 70041 03/23/06 GONTASTA STAN GONTA PINS-8/DAY CELEB 0.00 973.26 10100 70042 03/23/46 PENTAMAT 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 576.00 10100 10100 70042 70042 03/23/06 PENTAMAT SUNGARD PENTAMATION SUNGARD PEDJTAMATIO19 0014070 COMP MAINT-2/06-1/07 0'00 10100 70042 03/23/06 PENTAMAT 03/23/06 SUNGARD PENTAMATION 0014070 0014074 COMP MAINT-2/06-1/07 0.00 779.40 2589.34 10100 TOTAL 70042 PENTAMAT 03/23/06 PENTAMAT SUNGARD PENTAMATION SUNGARD COMP MAINT-2/06-1/07 FIN SYST-SALES TAX 0.00 8400.63 CHECK PENTAMATION 0014070 COMP MAINT-2/06-1/07 0.00 2219.99 10160 0. cc 4720.78 70043 03/23/06 TELEPACI TELEPACTFIC COMMf1NICATIO 0014070 0'00 18710.14 10100 70044 03/23/06 TENNISAN Tl INTERNET SVCS -MAR 0 0.00 502.89 10100 -10045 TENNIS ANYONE 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 03/23/06 TOSHIBAB TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIO 0015333 3138.$0 10100 70046 03/23/06 TOTALPLA COPIER MAINT-DBC MA 0.04 88.16 10100 70047 TOTALPLAN 0014690 OFFICE FURNITURE -ITS C 0.00 03/23/06 TRICITIE TRI -CITIES POOL SERVICE 6015333 1537.15 MONTHLY MAINT-DBC F 0.00 160.00 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PEN`'AMATION INC - FIND ACCOUNTING DATE 03/31.06 TME:: 09:21:21 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 7 CHECK CHECK REGISTE'R - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21 SELECTION ACCOUNTING Cr PERIODRIOD:: transact 00:00:00.0' and transact.ck_daLe>'20060316 9/06 00:00:00.0' FUND -- 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CL'ECK NO ISSUE DT ----------- ---VENDOR------------ FUND/DIVISION ---- DESCRIPTION------ SA.,ES TAX AMOUNT 10100 10100 70048 70048 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARE 03/23/06 0015340 CINIDE 10100 70048 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARF 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN 1385538 LANDSCAPE -PARKS CIWIDE LANDSCAPE -DIST 0.00 35 1Q1C'0 10100 70048 70048 LANDCARE 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1395539 1415541 C/WIDE LANDSCAPEDIST0.00 0.00 5576. 5576.50 10828.67 10100 70048 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARE 03/23/06 TRUGREEN 0015340 C/WIDE LANDSCAPE -DIST ADDL MAINT-PARKS Co 3409.33 101['0 10100 70048 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1385538 ADDL MAINT-DIST 38 0.00 0.00 745.39 TOTAL CHECK 70048 03/23/06 TRUGREEN TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1395539 0015340 ADDL MAINT-DIST 39 0,00 1120.95 285 74 ADDL MAINT-PARKS 0.00 1800.00 10100 70049 03/23/06 UCLAEXTE UCLA EXTENSION 0.00 31563.93 10100 70050 03/23/06 0015551 TRNG-K MOLINA 0.00 325.00 UNITEDSI UNITED SITE SERVICES OF 0015340 EQ RENTAL-LORBEER SCHL 10100 70051 03/23/06 USPSBULK UNITED STATES POSTAL SER 0014095 0.00 292.23 10100 70052 03/2.3/06 USPSBULK POSTAGE -CITY NEWSLF.TTE 0.00 17000.00 UNITED STATES POSTAI. SER 0014095 PERMIT FEES -#3339 10100 10100 70053 70053 03/23/06 VAILEYCR VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE M 0015333 03/23/06 LNDSCP 0.00 320 -Op TOTAL CHECK VALLEYCR VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE M 0015340 MAINT-DBC MA 0,00 5181,00 LNDSCP MAINT-PARKS MA 0.00 10425.00 10100 70054 03/23/06 VANTAGEP VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AG 001 0.00 15666.00 10100 70055 03/23/06 VERIZONC 03/24/06-P/R DEDUCTION 0.00 5909.45 10100 TOTAL CHECK 70055 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 03/23/06 VERIZONC VERI7,ON CALIFORNIA 0015340 0015340 PH -SVCS -HERITAGE PK 0.00 23.64 PH-SYC CYN PK 0.00 90.06 10100 70056 03/23/06 VERIZONM VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGI 0014090 0.00 113.70 10100 70057 03/23/06 VISIONIN PAGER SVCS -MAR -MAY 06 0.00 121.68 10100 VISION INTERNET PROVIDER 0014070 WEB HOSTING -MAR 06 0.00 70058 03/23/06 GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER INC. 0015340 150.00 10100 70059 03/23/06 BOOSTERC WALNUT/DIAMOND MAINT-MAPLE HILL PK 0.00 439.99 10100 BAR SHERI 0014010 MTG-COUNCIL 0.00 70060 03/23/06 BOOSTERC WALNUT/DIAMOND BAR SHERI 0014010 30.00 10100 70061 03/23/06 WANGWILL WILLIAM WANG MTG-COUNCIL 0.00 30.00 10100 70062 03/23/06 001 PK REFUND -DBC 28297 0.00 500.00 10100 10100 70062 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 001 ADMIN FEE -EN 06-508 0.00 10100 70062 70062 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 001 2505510 ADMIN 06-508 0 00 31.68 -31.68 10100 70062 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 03/23/06 2505510 SIGNAL TRFFC SIGNAL-PTHFNDPLE TRFFC 0.00 252.20 10100 10100 70062 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 2505510 SIGNAL-D/B/MAPLE TRFFC SIGNAL-D/B/SUNSE 0.00 0,00 252.20 70062 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECK$ 2505510 2505510 TRFFC SIGNAL-DS/NB 57 0.00 252.20 252.20 TRFFC SIGNAL-DB/C/SPRI 0.00 252.20 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC -- FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD 'ENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03 31/06 TIME: 09 21:21 C1''Y OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 8 : CHECK REG-STER - DISBTJRSEMFNT FU%D ACCTP.21 SELECTIOJ CRITERIA: trans-,ct.trans_date>'20p->03L 00:00:00 0' and transact.ck_date--'20050316 OO:OI 00.0' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 FUN:; - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL ACC'"' CHECK NO 70062 70062 70062 CHECK I:SUE DT -------------- ---- ---- ----- 0.',/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 03/23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE 03;23/06 SIECKEWA WARREN SIECKE -- FUND/DIVISION 0015554 0015554 001 -----DESCRIPT• N-- --- ENGINEERING S`a.S-FEB ENGINEERING S`.;'(.:S-FES PROF.SVCS-EN Oe, -508 SALES TA3; 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM' SUNT 10';.50 96::.00 176-00 10100 10100 TOTAL 70063 70063 CHECK 03/23/06 WAXIESAN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 03/23/06 WAXIESAN WAYIE SANITARY St,'PPLY 0015340 001$333 SUPPLIES -PARKS SUPPLIES -DBC O.pO 0.00 0.00 251;.50 31).68 97:;.25 10100 10100 10100 107.00 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL 7006403/23/06 70065 70066 70067 70068 70069 70070 70071 70071 CHECK WUDAVID DAVID WU 0;/23/06 YAOLAWRE LAWRENCE YAO 03/30/06 AARP AARP 03/30/06 ACTGISIN ACT GIS INC 0.51130/06 ADELPHIA ADELPHIA 03/30/06 AGIACADE AGI ACADEMY CORP 03/30/06 AGGCOMWE AGRICULTURAL COM WGHTS 03/30/06 ALDEGUER ROSARIO ALDEGUER 03/30/06 ALDEGUER ROSARIO ALDEGUER 001 003 0015350 0014070 0015340 0015350 & 0014431 001 001 PK REFUND -DBC 27241 PK REFUND -DBC 27755 MATURE ➢RIVING CLASS -M GLS CONSULTING' SVC -MPR INTERNET SVCS -HERITAGE CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER COYOTE CONTROI, SVCS -JA STAFF TIME -DBC PK REFUND -DBC 28189 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 128`,.93 10:;,00 10°).00 13".00 2800.00 39,95 25;--00 68.21 00 50000 .00 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 10100 TOTAL 70072 70073 70074 70075 70075 70075 70075 CHECK 03/30/06 ALLIEDST ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINER 0015350 03/30/06 ALVAREZL LAUREEN ALVAREZ 001 03/30/06 AMERART AMERICANA ART CHINA CO 0014090 03/30/06 AMERICOM AMERICOMP GROUP INC 0014070 03/30/06 AMERICOM AMERICOMP GROUP INC 0019070 03/30/Ob AMERICOM AMERICOMP GROUP INC 0014070 O3i30/06 AM£RICOM AMERICOMP GROUP INC 0014D70 RENTAL -RECREATION RECREATION REFUND PROMO SUPPLIES -CITY MU SUPPLIES -TONER SUPPLIES -TONER SUPPLIES -TONER SUPPLIES -TONER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 472.00EQ 189.54 40.00 162.22 184.01 139.64 100.67 238.1.5 101000.00 10100 10100 10100 10100 70076 70077 70078 70079 70080 03/30/66 ANGELICH CHRISTINE ANN ANGELI 03;30/06 ARAUJOEL ELAILSE DE ARAUJO 03/30/06 AZIZISAA ISAAC AZIZ 03/30/06 BANKSLAT LATANYA BANKS 03/30/06 BAUTRAYM RAYMUNDO BAUTISTA 0015350 001 1185098 001 001 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER PK REFUND -DBC 28688 PER DIEM-ESRI CONF PK REFUND -28693 PK REFUND-REAGAN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 662.47 57,00 50.00 454.00 50.00 50.00 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENT_lvjATIUN IN=' - FUND ACCOi 'JT1NG DATE: 0 6 CI.Y OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 9 TIME: 099::2121:: _1 CHECK REG STER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21 SELECTION CR TERIA: tr-ansact.traris_Cate>'2006)315 00:00:00.0' and Lransact.ck date>12006031i; 00:00:00.0' ACCOUNTING P RIOD: 9;06 FUND - 01 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CH1,CK NO ISSUE DT -- ----------- VENDOR ---------- -- H'TTND/DIVTSION --- -DESCRIPTION------ SALES TAX AMOUNT 10100 70081 03/30/06 BEEREMOV BEE REMOVERS 0015340 10100 70082 03/30/06 BSNSPORT BSN SPORTS CORP 0015350 10100 10100 70083 70083 03/30/06 BUSINESS BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATI 0034090 10200 70083 03/30/06 BUSINESS BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATI 0014070 03/30/06 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 BUSINESS BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATI 0014070 101.00 70084 03/30/06 CASH CASH 001 10100 '70085 03/30/06 CAT'ABALL CATALINA BALLAST BULB CO 0015333 10100 70086 03/30/06 CHALNLEAN LEAN CHAN 001 10100 70087 03/30/06 CHP'QGTIN TINA CHANG 0015350 10100 "/0088 03/30/06 CHEATER CHARTER OAK GYMNASTICS, 0015350 10100 70089 03/30/06 CHTENALI ALICE CHIEN 0015350 10100 10100 70090 70090 03/30/06 CINGULAR CINGULAR WIRELESS 0014090 10100 70090 03/30/06 CINGULAR 03/30/06 CINGULAR CINGULAR WIRELESS CINGULAR 0014090 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2200.00 WIRELESS 0014090 10100 70091 03/30/06 COMMSUPP COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT G 0014090 10100 70092 03/30/06 LII,LIEC CONSTANCE J_ LILLIE 0015350 10100 70093 03/30/06 CONTACTO CONTACT OFFICE SOLUTIONS 0014090 10100 70094 03/30/06 CONVERSE CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0015240 10100 70095 03/30/06 DAVIDELO ELOISE DAVIS 001 10100 10100 70096 70096 03/30/06 DAVIDEVA 03/30/06 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIAT 2505310 TOTAL CHECK DAVIDEVA DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIAT 2505510 10100 70097 03/30/06 DENNISCA CAROL DENNIS 0014030 10100 10100 70098 70098 03/30/06 DEPTOFJU DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0014060 10100 70098 03/30/06 DEPTOFJU 03/30/06 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0014060 10100 70098 DEPTOFJU 03/30/06 DEPTOFJU DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF 0014060 10100 70098 03/30/06 DEPTOFJU JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0014060 0014060 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 BEE REMUVAL-SYC CYN PK 0.00 65.00 SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0.00 329.49 SUPPLIES -TELEPHONE 0.00 75.00 SUPPLIES -TELEPHONE 0,00 341.50 SUPPLIES -TELEPHONE 0,00 422.88 0.00 839-38 CHANGE -CITY B/DAY CELE 0.00 600.00 SUPPLIES -DBC 0.00 94.74 REC'REATTON REFUND 0.00 64.00 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 192.00 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 582.00 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 538.20 CELL CHRGS-POOL VEH 0.00 12,72 CELL CHRGS-POOL VEH 0.00 13.55 CELL CHRGS-POOL VEH 0.00 12.72 0.00 38-99 CONSULTING SVCS-FEB/MA 0.00 481,25 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER 0.00 411.60 COPIER MAINT-FEB/MAR 0.00 757.60 CONSULTING SVCS -DEC -FE 0.00 2200.00 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 48.00 CIP PROD -LANDSCAPE 0.00 3727.74 CTP PROJ-ARCHITECT 0.00 3727.75 0.00 7455.49 PROF'.SVCS-CC/SS 3/21 0.00 250.00 LIVE SCAN -FINGERPRINT 0.00 96.00 LIVE SCAN -FINGERPRINT 0.00 160.00 LIVE SCAN -FINGERPRINT 0.00 370.00 LIVE SCAN -FINGERPRINT 0.00 32,00 LIVE SCAN -FINGERPRINT 0.00 32.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING S-NGAHD PFNTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING D -.TE: 03/33/06 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 14 T ifE: 09:7.7:21 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCTPA21 S -.LECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans,dat-e>'20060315 00:00:00.0' and transact.ck date>'2,0060316 OO:OO:QQ.Q' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 _ FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND C_ -.SH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ---- ----------- VENDOR-------FUND/DIVISION ----- -- --DESCF.IPTION---- - SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 10100 10L00 70099 70099 03/30/06 DESFORGE KEN DESFORGES 1185098 REIMS-ESRI 0.00 690.00 111900 70099 03/30/06 DESFORGE KEN i7ESFORGES 03/30/06 1185098 CONF REIMS-ESRI CONE 0.00 99.53 TOTAL CHECK DESFORGE KEN DESFORGES 1185p98 REIMS-ESRI CONE 0.00 87.00 0.00 72,09 10100 lUlOp 70100 03/30/06 DHBREAKF DIAMOND BAR BREAKFAST LI 0015350 0.00 258.62 TOTAL CHECK 70100 63/36/06 DBBRFAKF DIAMOND DAR BREAKFAST LI 0015350 REIMB-EASTER SUPPLIES 0.00 23.34 REIMB-EASTER SUPPLIES 0.00 247.00 10100 10100 70101 70.101 03/30/06 DBDELI DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONA 03/30/)6 0014090 MTG SUPPRLIES-ERC 3;1 0.00 270.34 TOTAL CHECK DBDELI DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONA 0015350 SUPPLIES -COMM 0.00 75.00 SVCS 0.00 100.00 10100 10100 70102 70102 03/30/06 DIVERSIF DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT 1125553 DIAMOND 0.00 175.00 TOTAL CHECK 03/30/06 DIVERSIF DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT 1125553 AIDE -2/16-2/28 DIAMOND RIDE 0.00 14018.51 -3/1-3/15 0.00 10996.37 10100 70103 03/30/06 DRIVERAL DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE 0015350 0.00 25014.88 10100 SPCL EVENT INS -CITY H/ 0.00 1369.80 10100 70104 70104 03/30/06 EXCELLAN EXCEL LANDSCAPE 03/30/06 1415541 ADDL AIMST 41 TOTAL CHECK EXCELLAN EXCEL LANDSCAPE 1385538 LANDSCAPETAI NT -MAR 06 0.00 390.25 0.00 3547.59 10100 10100 70105 03/30/06 EXTERMIN EXTERMINETTCS OF SO CAL 0015333 0.00 3937,84 TOTAL CHECK 70105 03/30/06 EXTERMIN EXTERMINETICS OE SO CAL 0015333 PEST CONTROL SVCS -DBC 0.00 75.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS -DBC 0,00 40.00 10100 70106 03/30/06 FAIRBANK FATRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLI 0014090 0.00 115.00 10100 CONSULTING SVCS-LIBRAR 0.00 9875.00 70107 03/30/06 FASTSERV FAST SERVICE INC 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -JAN 10100 70108 03/30/06 FILLMORE FILLMORE & WESTERN RAILW 0015350 -FES D. 00 752.84 10100 ADULT EXCURSION -APR 06 0.00 782,46 10104 70109 70109 03/30/06 FIRSTCLA FIRST CLASS EVENTS 03/30/06 FIRSTCLA 001 PK REFUND -DBC 0.00 TOTAL CHECK FIRST CLASS EVENTS 001 PROP DAMAGE -DBC 800.00 0.00 -28.40 10100 10100 70110 03/30/06 FLACKSED ED FLACKS 0015230 0.00 772.00 TOTAL CHECK 70110 03/30/06 FLACKSED ED FLACKS 0015230 REIMB-TUITION REIMB-TUITION 0'00 40.00 0.00 13.00 10100 10100 70111 03/30/06 FONGNANC NANCY FONG 0015210 0_00 53.00 TOTAL CHECK 70111 03/34/06 FONGNANC NANCY FON) 0015210 REIMB-MTG SUPPLIES REIMB-MTG D-00 53.09 SUPPLIES 0.00 23.91 10100 70112 03/30/06 GALANGGE GENEVIEVE GALANG 001 0.00 77.00 PK REFUND-PANTERA 275 0.00 250.00 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTAMATION IN(, FJIND ACCOUNTING DATF: 03/31/06 FIMF: 09;21:21 CITY OF DIAMOND R.;R PAG F, NUMSIIR: 11 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND AC(TPA-)1 ACCOUNTING CRITERIA; /Ca' acr.trans_date>'20060315 00:00:00.0' and transa c:_:ck_date>'20060316 00:00:00.0 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/0F, FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ---- ----------VENDOR- - ----- ---- FUND/D_'VISION -----DESCRIPTIc)N 10100 70113 - ---- SALES TAX AMOUNT 03/30/06 GONZCARO CAROL GONZALE2 OOI 16100 70114 03/30/06 GRIFFITH SHANNON GRIFFITHS PK REFUND -HERITAGE 27 0'00 250.00 10100 70115 03/30/06 HALLFORE HALL 0015350 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0.00 10100 70116 & FOREMAN, INC. 03/30/06 0015557 PROF .SVCS -PLAN CHECK 0.00 HOCATHER CATHERINE HO 001 496.80 900.00 10100 70117 03/30/06 HONBALIS LISA HONER RECREATION REFUND 0.00 64.00 1G100 70118 03/30/06 HO'T'SHOTS HOT 001 1?K REFUND-DF3C 0. 10100 70119 SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAR 0015350 SUPPLIES -RECREATION 10100 70119 03/30/06 IVDB INLAND VALLEY DAILY 03/30/06 BULL ODl 0. 0000 923.00.56 10100 70119 IVDB INLAND VALLEY DAILY 03/30/06 IVDB -BULL 001 LEGAL AD -FPL 2006-192 LEGAL 0.00 145.60 10100 70119 INLAND VALLEY DAILY 03/30/06 IVDB BULL 001 AD -FPL 2006-191 LEGAL 0.00 2'34.00 TOTAL CHECK INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULL 001 AD -FPL 2004-85 0 00 7-6'40 LEGAL AD -FPL 2006-193 0.00 10100 70120 03/30/06 IVHSINLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOC 0014437 0.00 1.6.40 775.20 10100 70121 03/30/06 ICSC INTERNATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -AP 0.00 F,8i1.92 10100 70122 COUNCIL OF 0014070 MEMBERSHIP DUES 03/30/06 JOEGONSA JOE A. GONSALVES & SON I 0014030 0-00 )0.00 10100 70123 63/30/06 JUDICIAL JUDICIAL LEGISLATIVE SVCS -MAR 0 0.00 3004.00 10100 70129 DATA SYSTEM 03/30/06 COR 00.14411 PARKING CITE ADMIN -FEB 0.00 KIRCHNER BONNIE KIRCHNER 001 1704.64 10100 70125 63/30/06 KLEINFEL KLEINFELDER PK REFUND -DBC 27746 0.00 500,00 10100 70126 INC 03/30/06 KOONTZAR ARLETTE 0015551 CONSULTING SVCS -MAR 06 0.00 36,,7 50 10100 70127 KOONTZ 03/30/06 001 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 10100 10100 70127 70127 LEWISENG LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. 03i30/06 LEWISENG LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. 0014090 ENGRAVING SVC-TILE/SAD 47.00 10100 70127 63/30/06 LEWISENG LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. 03/30/06 0014090 0014090 ENGRAVING SVC-TILE/BAD 0.00 0'00 06.21 10100 TOTAL 70127 LEWISENG LEWIS ENGRAVING INC_ 03;30/06 LEWISENG LEWIS ENGRAVING SVC -BADGES ENGRAVING 0.00 106.09 120.16 CHECK ENGRAVING INC. 0014090 SVC -TILES ENGRAVING SVC -BADGES 0.00 110.42 10100 10100 70128 70128 03/30/06 LASHERIF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERI 0014911 03/30/06 0.04 0.00 77.14 469.02 10100 10100 70128 LASHERIF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERI 0014411 03/30/06 LASHERIF LOS CALVARY CHAPEL -FEB 06 CROWD CONTROL 0.00 7077.42 10100 70128 70128 ANGELES COUNTY SHERI 1125553 03/30/06 LASHERIF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERI -SCRIBBLE TRANSIT SALES -JAN 06 0.00 6537.68 TOTAL CHECK 0014411 03/30/06 LASHERIF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERI 0014411 STAR DEPUTY SVCS -FEB 0 0-00 0'00 718.93 CONTRACT SVCS -FEB 06 0.00 8698.58 10100 70.129 03/30/06 MANTRASA ANN MANTRAS 0.00 348497.22 3708'10.23 001 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 59.00 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03/31/06 TIME: 09:21:21 CITY OF' L;IAMOND BAR PAG: NUMBER: 12 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEME,NT FUND ACC -I. -k21 SELECTION CRITI-RIA: 9/06 ct.r_rans_date>'200F,0315 00:00:00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: g/n6 .0' and transac1.ck_date>'20060316 OO;I?0:00.0' FUND - 007 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ------------ - VENDOR ------------- FUND/DIVISION 10100 70130 03/30/06 MAYKAREN KAREN MAY 10100 70131 03/30/06 MAZZAWIB BASSEM MAZZAWI i}01535G 10100 70132 03/30/06 MCECORPO MCE CORPORATION 001 10100 70133 03/30/06 MEYERSAD ALISON D. 0015558 MEYERS 001$350 10100 70134 03/30/06 MIRANDAC CRYSTAL MIRANDA 10100 70135 03/30/06 MOBILERE MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES 001 0014440 10100 703.36 03/30/06 MTCALVAR MT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHUR 0015350 10100 70137 03/30/06 NEXTELCO NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 0014090 10100 70138 03/30/06 NORRISRE NOPPIS REPKE INC 10100 70139 03/30/06 OAKTREE OAK TREE LANES INC 2505510 10100 70140 03/30/06 OWENSTED TED OWENS 0015350 10100 76141 0015310 03/30/06 PAETECCO PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS 10100 70142 IN 03/30/06 PAZLAURI LAURIE 6014090 PAZ 001 10100 70143 03/30/06 PURKTSSR PURKISS ROSE RSI 10100 70144 03/30/06 QUINLAN QUINLAN PUBLISHING 2505310 10100 GROUP 0014030 70145 03/30/06 R&DBLUE R & D BLUEPRINT 10100 10140 70146 70146 03/30/06 RALPHS RALPHS GROCERY/FOOD 4 LE 03/30/06 RALPHS 0015510 0014090 TOTAL CHECK RALPHS GROCERY/FOOD 4 LE 0015350 10100 70147 03/30/06 RAMOSTRI TRICIA RAMOS 10100 70148 03/30/06 REINBERG REINBERGER PRINTWERKS 001 10100 10100 70149 70149 03/30/06 SGVT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 03/30/06 0014090 01 10100 70149 SGVT 03/30/06 SGVT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 4061 10100 10100 7014SAN 9 70149 GABRTEL VALLEY TRIBU 03/30/06 SGVT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY 001 10100 70149 03/30/06 SGVT TRIBU SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 03/30/06 001 001 10100 70149 SGVT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 03/30/06 SGVT 001 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 001 ---- -DESCRIPTION ------ SALES TAX AMOUNT CONTRACT' CLASS -WINTER RECREATION REFUND VEGETATION MAINT-FEB 0 PER DIEM -NTL LEAGUE CO PK REFUND-SYC CYN PK REPEATER SVCS-FEB/MAR FACILITY RENTAL -MAR 06 AIRTIME CHRGS-P/W,C/S, SLURRY SEAL PROJ-AREA CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER REIMB-CPRS CONE LONG DIST SVCS-MAR/APR PK REFUND -DBC 28090 DESIGN SVCS -PAUL GROW PUBLICATIONS -CITY MAMA PRINT SVCS-P/WORKS SUPPLIES -GENERAL SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS PK REFUND-REAGAN 2847 PRINT SVCS -ENVELOPES LEGAL AD -FPL 2006-191 LEGAL AD -FPI, 2004-85 LEGAL AD -PPL 2006-192 LEGAL AD -FPL 2006-193 LEGAL AD -FPL 2002-09 LEGAL AD -FPI, 2006-190 LEGAL AD -FPL 2006--189 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.0u 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING 432.00 59.00 7370.97 70.00 50.00 78.75 7640.00 652.42 120.00 207.00 15.35 866.14 500.00 3064.19 195.89 15.13 25.36 34.98 60.34 50.00 249.52 222.14 217.44 217.44 242.82 272.90 143.03 143.03 ;UNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 03/31%06 IME: 09:21:21 (ITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAGE NUMBER: 13 CHECK R::GISTER - DISBURSEMYNT FUND ACCTPA23_ ELECTION CPERIOD : transact trans date>'20060375 00:�G:fO-0' and transact.ck_date>'20060316 00:00:00.0' ELECTION PERIOD_ 9106 FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ----- 10100 70149 ---------VENDOY --- - ____-- 03/30/06 FUND/DIV7:SION -----DESCRIPTION------ SALES TAX 'TOTAL CHECK SGVT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBU 0215210 AMOUNT 12100 70150 AD-PLNG 0.00 245.64 OTAL 70150 03/30/06 SMARTFIN SMART & FINAL 03/30/06 0015350 0.00 1704.44 TOTAL CHECK SMARTFIN SMART & FINAL 00153$0 SUPPLIES -SR BINGO 0'02 SUPPLIES -DBC 270.00 i0100 10100 70151 70151 03/30/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIF( - 0.00 0-00 103.93 373.93 10100 70151 03/30/06 03/30/06 SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 03/30/05 SCE EDIS 0015510 EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0 00 0100 70151 SOUTHERN CAi,IFGRNIA 03/30/06 SCE EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0-00 27'97 TOTAL CIJECK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS 0015510 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 131-34 ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CON 0.00 42.48 10100 10100 70152 70152 03/30/06 SPARKLET SPARKLETTS 0'00 671.02 872.81 TOTAL CHECK 03/30/06 SPARKLET SPARKLETTS 0014090 SUPPLIES -WATER 0014090 EQ RENTAL-FEB/MAR 06 0'00 284.52 10100 10100 70153 70153 03/32/06 STANDARD STANDARD INSURNCE 2.00 0'00 9.75 294.27 10100 70153 OF 03/30/06 STANDARD STANDARD INSURNCE OF 03/30/06 ORE 001 ORE 001 APR 06 -LIFE SNS PREMS 0.00 TOTAL TOTAL 70153 STANDARD STANDARD INSURNCE OF 03/30/06 STANDARD ORE 001 APR C6-SUPP LIFE INS p 0'00 643.80 CHECK STANDARD INSURNCE OF ORE 0014095 APR 06-STD/LTD 0.00 42.00 APR 06 -LIFE INS PREMS 0.00 1146.17 10100 70154 03/30/06 STERLING DEBORAH STERLING0.00 14.50 1846.47 10100 10100 70155 03/30/06 SUBWAY SUBWAY OOZ PK REFUND -DBC 27975 0.00 100.00 TOTAL CHECK 70155 03/30/06 SUBWAY SUBWAY 0014090 MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0214090 MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0.00 0 9.58 10100 70156 03/30/26 THECOMDY THE COMDYN GROUP 02 0,00 9.58 19.16 10100 70157 INC 03/30/06 THEWHOLE THE WHOLE 0014070 CONSULTING SVCS -INFO S 0.00 525.00 10100 70158 ENCHILADA INC 03/30/06 0014090 MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0.00 TOOLSRUS TOOLS R US 361.46 101000015333 70159 03/30/06 UPS MAINT-DBC 0'00 10100 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 0014090 EXPRESS MAIL 10.00 10100 70160 70160 03/30/06 VALLEYTR VALLEY TROPHY0.00 -GENERAL 10.00 TOTAL CHECK 03/3 0/0& VALLEYTR VALLEY TROPHY 0015350 0015350 SUPPLIES -RECREATION SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0.00 0.00 136.40 10100 70161 03/30/06 VERIZONC VERIZON CALIFORNIA 0-00 1966.73 2103.13 10100 10300 70162 03/30/06 VERIZDNW VERIZON 0015333 PH.SVCS-DBC 0'00 90.31 10100 70162 70162 WIRELESS -LA 03/30/06 VERIZONW VERIZON WIRELESS -LA 03/30/06 0014070 0014030 CELL CHRGS-DESFORGES 0.00 10100 10100 70152 VERIZONW VERIZON WIRELESS -LA 03/30/0& VERIZONW VERIZON 0014440 CELL CHRGS-EOC CELL 0.00 65.26 42.41 70162 WIRELESS -LA 03/30/26 VERIZONW VERIZON WIRELESS 0014090 CHRGS-EOC CELL CHRGS-GENERAL 0.00 115.29 -LA 0014090 CELL CHRGS-GENERAL 0.00 38.43 4.00 36.53 RUN DATE 03/31/26 TIME 09:21:23 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING ST.TNGARD PENTAMATION INC FUND ACCOUNTING DATY: 03/31/06 T'MF.: 09:21:21 CITY OF DIAMOND PAR "HECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ACCOUNTING CRITERIA: transact.trans date>'20Q6031S 00:00:00.0' and transact.ck_date>'2006031.6 00.00:tiO.D ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 - PAGE NT:MBFR: 14 ACC'FPA 1 i FUND - 001 - GENERAT, FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT -------_ TOTAL CHECK ------VL:NDOR-------------- FUND, DIVISION -`---DESCRIPTION--- -- SALES TAX .^-.MOUNT 10100 70163 03.30/06 VERMONTS VERMONT SYSTEMS INC 0.00 297.92 10100 0164 - 03 30/06 1185098 WEBTRAC CONF-STAFF 0.00 16100 0164 VSP VISION SERVICE PLAN C3 30/06 001 175.00 ]0100 70164 VSP VISION SERVICE PLAN 03;'30/06 VSP 001 APR 06 -VISION PREMIUMS 0'00 X107.58 10500 70164 VISION SERVICE PLAN C3 30/06 VSP 0014095 APR 06 -COBRA VISION 0.00 TOTAL CHECK VISIQN SERVICE PLAN 0014095 APR 06 -VISION PREMIUMS 0.00 46.77 APR 06 -VISION PREMIUMS 0.00 8'11 10100 701.65 03 30/06 BOOSTERC WALNUT/DIAMOND 18.12 17-80.58 10100 70166 BAR SHERI 00140100.00 MIG -COUNCIL 3 0'30/06 WAXIESAN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0015333 0.00 30.00 10100 10100 70167 70167 03 30/06 WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO BANK SUPPLIES -DBC 0.00 34.63 OTAL 70167 03 30/06 WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO BANK 03;30/06 0014030 0014010 MTG-TRANSIT PRGM 0'00 T TOTAL CHECK WELL WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO BANK 0014630 NAL LEAGUE CONF-DOYLE 0.00 30.85 NAL LEAGUE CONF-DOYLE 0.00 160.00 10100 70168 03;30/06 WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO 223-.75 412.60 10100 70169 BANK0.00 03'30106 0014010 NAT LEAGUE CONF-COUNCI 0.00 10100 TOTAL 70169 CHECK WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO BANK 03 30/06 WELLSFAR WELLS FARGO 0014030 MTG-CMGR 1273.63 BANK 0014630 MTG-CMGR 0.00 33.41 10100 10100 70170 70170 63/30/06 WILLISJE JEN WILLIS 0.00 0'00 73.82 107.23 TOTAL CHECK 03'30/06 WILLISJE JEN WILLIS 001 001 PK REFUND -DBC PROP DAMAGE -DBC 0.00 0.00 500.00 10100 70171 03/30;06 WOOMARTA MARIAN WOO 0'00 -60.00 440.00 10100 70172 03'30/06 WRIGHTP PAUL WRIGHT 001 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 59.00 10100 70173 03/30/06 YMCAADVE YMCA 0 014090 A/V SVCS-PLNG,CNCL, 0.00 280.00 10100 W/T #07 ADVENTURE PRINCESS 001 PROCEEDS -SNOW FEST 03,30/06 UNIONBAN UNION BANK OF 0 00 224.45 10100 06 -PP 06 CALIFORNIA ' 0014090 DBC -DEBT PMT 10100 06 -FP 06 03,,30/'06 PAYROLL PAYROLL T 3%30/06 001 0.00 ]-2941.80 10i00 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03/30/06 112 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 0.00 10100 06 -PP O6 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 63/30/06 115 P/R TRANSFER-06/Pp 06 0'00 105333.70 10100 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03/30/06 118 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 0'00 3162.1$ 10100 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03/30/06 125 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 0.00 1473.21 10100 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03;30/06 138 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 0.00 682.99 10100 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03%30/06 139 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 0'00 1336.72 10100 06 -PP Ob PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 03/30/06 PAYROLL 141 P/R TRANSFER-06/Pp 06 0.00 864.76 864.79 10100 10100 06 -PP 06 PAYROLL TRANSFER 03%30/06 PAYROLL PAYROLL 001 P/R TRANSFER-06/PP 06 P/R TRANSFER-061PP 0.00 $64.78 06 -PP 06 TRANSFER 03/30/06 PAYROLL PAYROLL TRANSFER 112 06 0.00 105333.70 115 0.00 3162.18 0.00 1473.21 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:24 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING SUNGARD PENTLMAT'-ON INC - FUND ACCOUNTTNG F'.GE N'MBER: 15 CITY OF D`;,MONL BAR ACCTPAII 1 DATE: 03 /31/OF TIME: 09:21:27 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>'2006[315 00:00:00.0' and :.ransact.ck date>'2006(.3I6 00:00:07.0' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/06 — ` FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT --------- --VENDOR------------- FUND/DIVISION -----DESCRIPTION ----- SALTS ZAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 224552.22 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1017835.35 TOTAL FUND 0.00 1017835.36 TOTAL REPORT O.GO 1017835.36 RUN DATE 03/31/06 TIME 09:21:24 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager TITLE: Treasurer's Statement --- February 20 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the February 2006, Treasurer's Statement. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact BACKGROUND: Agenda # Meeting Date: Apr. 4, 2006 AGENDA REPORT Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. This statement shows the preliminary cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances, and the effective yield earned from investments. This statement also includes a separate investment portfolio report which details the activities of the investments. All investments have been made in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director A Department He'Ad Attachments: Treasurer's Statement, Investment Portfolio Report M� - Deputy City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT February 28, 2006 . . . . . BEGINNING:.. DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT TRANSFERS ENDING BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS IN OUT BALANCE GENERAL FUND $28,074,906.11 $834,594.52 $1,283,201.68 $27,526,298.95 LIBRARY SERVICES FUND 0.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTE - 2.0 yr 0.00 COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FD (3,339.68) CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT: 2,200.00 (5,539.68) GAS TAX FUND 717,437.91 92,481.86 809,919.77 TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD 805,514.78 147,631.82 54,289.54 898,857.06 TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD 1,176,661.76 79,136.03 1,255,797.79 iSTEA Fund 0.00 0.00 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD 564,137.32 4,170,00 14,680.79 553,626.53 AB2928-TR CONGESTION RELIEF FD 122,103.53 122,103.53 AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD 85,237.05 16,239.78 3,888.72 97,588.11 PROP A - SAFE PARKS ACT FUND (2,016.41) (2,016.41) PARK & FACILITIES REVEL. FD 1,929,277.65 1,929,277.65 COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD (78,660.53) 11,977.00 14,112.38 (2,700.00) (83,495.91) CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY FD 298,850.64 298,850.64 NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD 324,722.62 324,722.62 CA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP PRG 73,491.39 73,491.39 LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD (68,254.08) 16,155.74 15,130.83 (67,229.17) LANDSCAPE DIST 939 FD 161,408.25 10,854.86 5,537.92 166,725.19 LANDSCAPE DIST 941 FD 209,882.30 8,926.36 6,444.20 212,364.46 GRAND AV CONST FUND 0.00 0.00 CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD (1,599,724.91) 289,158.57 2,700.00 (1,886,183.48) SELF INSURANCE FUND 1,363,398.99 1,363,398.99 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 141,329.31 141,329.31 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 31,917.86 31,917.86 PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY FUN 243,976.39 537.14 33,611.07 210,902.46 TOTALS $34,572,258.25 $1,222,705.11 $1,722,255.70 $0.00 $34,072,707.66 SUMMARY OF CASH: DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT PAYROLL ACCOUNT CHANGE FUND PETTY CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS INVESTMENTS: US TREASURY Money Market Acct. LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTE - 1.0 yr FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTE - 1.5 yr FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTE - 2.0 yr FED FARM CREDIT NOTE - 2.5 yr FED HOME LOAN BANK NOTE - 1.5 yr CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT: US TREASURY Money Market Account LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD (Bond Proceeds Account) ($151,791.02) 10,983.66 250.00 500.00 $677,109.76 28,324,752.80 1,000, 000.00 1,000, 000.00 1,000, 000.00 1,000, 000.00 1,000, 000.00 209, 217.41 1,685.05 ($140,057.36) TOTAL INVESTMENTS 34,212,765.02 TOTAL CASH $34,072,707.66 Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. There are two LAIF accounts set up. The regular account's funds are available for withdrawal within 24 hours. The LAIF Bond Proceeds account's withdrawals require 30 days notice. In addition, the City has started investing in longer term investments. These investments are detailed on the attached Investment Report. All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's estimated expenditures. Linda C. Lowry, Treasurer CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REPORT for the Month of February 2006 2004-05 Actual Interest Income $687,186.07 2005-06 Budgeted Interest Income $717,500.00 Actual Year -To -Date Interest Income $ 537,838.06 Percent of Interest Received to Budget 74.960% (1) Callable 12/29105 (2) Callable 04120/06 (3) Callable 10/28/05 (4) Callable 12/27/05 (5) Callable 12/09/05 Monthly Interest Purchase Maturity Amount Fair Market Interest Received Yield Investment Type Rating Date Date Term At Cost Value Accrued in Feh'06 Rate Institution 28,324,752.80 28,255,699.29 95,430.81 - 4.043% 4.043% State of California Local Agency Inv Fund AAA 677,109.76 677,109.76 - 2,098.78 3.320% 3.320% Wells Fargo Bank US Treasury Money Market AAA 209217 41 209,217.41 518.00 4.380% 4.380% Union Bank -(Fiscal Agent) US Treasury Money Market AAA 1,685.05 1,685.05 6.15 19.14 4.380% 4.380% Union Sank -(Fiscal Agent) Local Agency Inv Fund AAA Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note AAA 09!29105 09129!05 1.0 Yr 1,000,000.00 994,900.00 3,625.00 3,541.67 4.350% 4.350% (1) 4.250% 4.250% (2) Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note AAA 10/20!05 04/20/07 1.5 Yr Yrs 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,500.00 992,300.00 3,375.00 4.050% 4.050% (3) Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note AAA 09/28105 09128/07 2.0 Yrs 1,000,000.00 992,400.00 3,783.33 4.540% 4.540% (4) Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Farm Credit Note AAA 09127!05 03/27108 2.5 1,000,000.00 994,500.00 3,833.33 4.600% 4.600% (5) Wells Fargo Inst Securities Federal Home Loan Note AAA 11/09/05 05/49/07 1.5 Yrs $ 34,212,765.02 $ 34,111,311.51 $ 113,595.30 $ 2,635.92 Totals for month Less Investments matured during the month 0.00 0.00 Total Investments at 02128106 $ 34,212,765.02 $ 34,111,311.51 2004-05 Actual Interest Income $687,186.07 2005-06 Budgeted Interest Income $717,500.00 Actual Year -To -Date Interest Income $ 537,838.06 Percent of Interest Received to Budget 74.960% (1) Callable 12/29105 (2) Callable 04120/06 (3) Callable 10/28/05 (4) Callable 12/27/05 (5) Callable 12/09/05 Agenda # Meeting Date 0 April 4, 2006 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT rig TO: Honorable Mayor and Members o the City Council VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage TITLE: APPROPRIATION OF $43,901.00 FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES AND RATIFICATION OF AN AWARD OF CONTRACT TO EROSION CONTROL SPECIALISTS (ECS) FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES (TEMPORARY WEATHERIZATION) OF THE SUNSET CROSSINGIMINNEQUA LANDSLIDE IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,901.00 AND A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $4,000.00 FOR CHANGE ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $43,901.00. RECOMMENDATION: Appropriate and Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: To date, the City has incurred cost associated with the temporary weatherization. They are as follows: " To be prepared Staff will present a detailed and itemized account of the costs incurred by the City at a future Council meeting. The matter of cost recovery shall also be brought forward at a future meeting. Kleinfelder Total for Total Cost ECS (Geotechnical Engineering Administrative Fiscal To Date Contractor Consultant Cost* Year FY 04105 $35,000.00 $14,700.00 $49,700.00 FY 05106 $39,901.00 $5,200.00 $45,101.00 " To be prepared Staff will present a detailed and itemized account of the costs incurred by the City at a future Council meeting. The matter of cost recovery shall also be brought forward at a future meeting. BACKGROUND: On January 11, 2005 a mudslide approximately 100 feet wide by 135 feet long occurred on private property within five single family residential lots. To prevent further deterioration, on January 17, 2005 the City's geotechnical engineering consultant (Kleinfelder), submitted recommendations for the temporary storm protection of the slope failure area. These recommendations included covering the slope with plastic, sandbagging the terrace drains to prevent surface water from entering the distressed area, and redirecting the water from these drains to a suitable collection point. On January 24, 2005 the recommendations of Kleinfelder were carried out by the City's contractor, Erosion Control Specialists (ECS) with the property owners' signed approval and completed in mid-February of 2005. Shortly after the City's work, on February 22, 2005, an independent contractor was retained by the five (5) property owners to recover the soil mass as additional movement had occurred. Since then, no further work has occurred on the landslide and the existing weatherization work has deteriorated. Furthermore, four (4) of the five (5) homes remain red -tagged while the fifth is still occupied by the property owners at the approval of the City's Chief Building Official. Staff has repeatedly requested the property owners' cooperation in resolving a prohibited and unstable slope condition on the private properties. The failing slopes remain unabated. On October 25, 2006 the City finally issued an "Order to Abate Slope Hazard" to the four property owners. There was no response from any of the property owners nor have they performed the requested actions. On February 14, 2006, pursuant to the City provisions set forth in Diamond Bar Development Code, the City issued a Notice of Nuisance Determination and Intended Actions. None of the four property owners challenged the Notice. DISCUSSION: On March 22, 2006, the City Prosecutor and staff obtained warrants from Judge Gately, Los Angeles County Superior Court, for the four affected properties. These warrants enabled City contractors to enter these 4 properties to undertake the temporary weatherization work. Copies of the warrants were sent to each property owner and their respective attorneys. Two contractors were contacted to obtain bids for the temporary weatherization actions. One contractor declined while ECS submitted a bid in the amount of $39,901.00. The City accepted ECS' bid and issued a Notice to Proceed effective March 27, 2006. Clean up of the existing deteriorated coverage began on Monday, March 27, 2006 with ECS. The upper portion of the landslide along the two properties on Minnequa was covered immediately as it was declared by Kleinfelder as a critical location of the landslide. Complete coverage of the slope is expected to be completed in approximately 14 calendar days but has been delayed due to the recent rain storm that came in on March 28tH Due to the urgency of threat of additional erosion damage, the City Manager, after appropriate administrative judicial process, authorized the contract with ECS. The Council is therefore being asked to ratify that contract and make the necessary appropriation of funds. The Council must also be informed that the actions taken thus far by the City, do not correct the existing slope failure which remains the responsibility of the private property owners. PREPARED BY: Kimberly Molina, Associate Engineer Date Prepared: March 28, 2006 REVIEWED BY: David . Liu, Director of Public Works Attachments: ECS Contract Agreement ECS Bid Dated March 15, 2006 AGREEMENT The following agreement is made and entered into, in duplicate, as of the date executed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk, by and between Erosion Control Specialists hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Diamond Bar, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in the notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of CONTRACTOR Erosion Control Specialists. and; WHEREAS, City has authorized the Mayor to execute a written contract with CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment and material for the Sunset Crossing/Minnegua Landslide Nuisance Mitigation in the City of Diamond Bar. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CONTRACTOR shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the Sunset Crossing/Minneclua Landslide Nuisance Mitigation in the City of Diamond Bar. The work to be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications, dated January 17 2005 (The Plans and Specifications) on file in the office of the City Clerk and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instructions of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The Plans and Specifications are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if set forth in full herein. The Plans and Specifications, CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated March 15 2006, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. TERMS OF CONTRACT The CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work within Twenty-one (21) calendar days from the date of the notice to proceed. The CONTRACTOR agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of five hundred ($500.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the CONTRACTOR under this agreement. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages. 4. INSURANCE: The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every CONTRACTOR shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. The CONTRACTOR, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract." b. For all operations of the CONTRACTOR or any sub -contractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: 1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each person; $500,000 aggregate. 3) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 4) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. 5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. C. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall: 1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted to do business in the State of California. 2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, its officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; 3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon to cover a loss under the policy; 4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." 5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to the City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: 1 } Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; 2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. The CONTRACTOR shall, within ten (10) days from the date of the notice of award of the Contract, deliver to the City Manager or his designee the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or deliver to the City Manager or his designee a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insured and other provisions required herein. 5. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR is required to make contribution to funds established for the administrative of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other CONTRACTOR'S on the public works site are making such contributions. The CONTRACTOR and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 6. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (S) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the CONTRACTOR and any sub -contractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any sub- CONTRACTOR under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which the laborer, workman or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code. 7. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 8. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Diamond Bar and its officers, agents and employees ("Idemnitees") shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen or employees of the CONTRACTOR, of his subcontractor's or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever. The CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnitees against and will hold and save Indemnitees harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the CONTRACTOR, his agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City. In connection therewith: a. The CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the CONTRACTOR or Indemnities covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations or activities of the CONTRACTOR hereunder, and the CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees harmless therefrom. C. In the event Indemnitees are made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the CONTRACTOR for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities hereunder, the CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to Indemnitees and any all costs and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So much of the money due to the CONTRACTOR under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damages as aforesaid. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under this Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Indemnitor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend at its expense CONTRACTOR from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, charges, expenses or attorneys fees to which CONTRACTOR may be subject by virtue of CONTRACTOR entering the property and performing the work set forth in the scope of services in a professional manner as directed by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City's obligation under this Section shall not apply to liability incurred by CONTRACTOR for actions outside the scope of services or which result from wrongful or malicious conduct or negligence in the performance of the work, all as to which CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents and employees harmless. 9. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1735, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons in the work contemplated by this Agreement because of the race, color or religion of such person. A violation of this section exposes the CONTRACTOR to the penalties provided for in Labor Code Section 1735. 10. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the CONTRACTOR for furnishing all material and doing the prescribed work the unit prices set forth in the Price Schedule in accordance with CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated March 15, 2006. 11. TERMINATION: This agreement may be terminated by the City, without cause, upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONTRACTOR at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the date of termination specified in the notice. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall only be paid for services rendered and expenses necessarily incurred prior to the effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California "CONTRACTOR'S" License No. 851583 D64 Erosion Control Specialists 16761 Viewpoint Suite 74 Huntin ton Beach CA 92647 IN Date TITLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA By: CAROL HERRERA, MAYOR Date ATTEST: By: TOMMYE A. CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK Date CONTRACTOR'S Business Phone 800 376-1015 Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any time _ (909) 733-9637 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date Agenda # 6.7 Meeting Date: April 4. 200b CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT C�'� TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of�.the City Council VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager. TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 004-M TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT NO. 07-5455 FOR FEDERAL FUNDS TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE GRAND AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - PHASE II RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The adoption of the Resolution and the execution of Program Supplement Agreement will allow the City to be reimbursed $1,405,909 of the estimated Phase ll project cost of $1,680,000. The following table details the project construction funding sources: Fund Surface 2005 Federal Transportation Local Type Transportation Appropriation Development Act Funds/ Local Match Program -Local (Miller) (TDA)/Local Match STP -L Amount $935,845 $470,064 $31,083 $243,008 Total Pro'ect Cost 1 $1,680,000 * At the time of construction contract award, staff will recommend that the City Council appropriate General Fund Balance (most likely proceeds from previous sales of Prop A funds) for the construction of the Grand Avenue Improvements Project, Phase 11. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: The City has previously entered into an agreement with the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), commonly referred as Administering Agency - State Agreement No. 07-5455, which allows the City to administer Federally Funded Project. The Grand Avenue Improvements Project — Phase ll from 470 feet west of Cahill Place to Rolling Knoll Road consists of asphalt and concrete pavement rehabilitation; center median irrigation and landscaping improvements; traffic striping and signage. The construction cost of the project will primarily be funded with Federal Funds (STPL and Miller). The Program Supplement No. 004-M to the Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5455 is specifically for Phase II of the Grand Avenue Improvements Project. The adoption of the Resolution and execution of the Program Supplement are required for the City to receive $1,405,909 of Federal Funds. PREPARED BY: Fred Alamolhoda, Project Manager Date Prepared: March 30, 2006 REVIEWE David diirector of Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 2006 -XX Program Supplement Agreement No. 004-M E RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 004-M TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT NO. 07-5455 FOR FEDERAL FUNDS TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE GRAND AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PHASE II WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (TEA -21) and 2005 Appropriation Programs Funds for program funding; WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar (City) annually receives Surface Transportation Program — Local Funds through Metropolitan Transportation Authority; WHEREAS, the City has applied for the 2005 Federal Appropriation Funds from the United States Congress and the funds have been awarded to the City; WHEREAS, the Program Supplement Agreement No. 004-M to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5455 shall be fully executed by the City and State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prior to processing of the City's requests for reimbursement of the federal funds for the Grand Avenue Improvements Project, Phase II. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: Section 1. Approve the Program Supplement No. 004-M to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5455 for Federal Funds to be utilized for the construction of the Grand Avenue Improvements Project, Phase II. Section 2. Certifies that the Grand Avenue Improvements Project, Phase II will be constructed in accordance with the Program Supplement No. 004-M and federal procedures outlined in the Local Assistance Program Manual and Guidelines. Section 3. Appoints, the City Manager as an authorized official of the City of Diamond Bar to execute, conduct all negotiations, submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment request, reimbursement request from Caltrans and so on, which will be required for the completion of the project construction. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a regular meeting of the City Council this 4th day of April 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 4th day of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar, CA STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 TDD (916) 654-4014 (916) 654-3151 Fax (916) 653-7621 March 1, 2006 Mr. David G. Liu Director of Public Works City of Diamond Bar 21825 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Dear Mr. Liu: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor 0 File: 07-LA-0-DMBR STPL-5455(005) On Grand Ave from 470' w/o Cahill Place to Rolling Knod (Phase 11). ell Enclosed are two originals of the Program Supplement Agreement No. 004-M to Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5455 and an approved Finance Letter for the subject project. Please retain the signed Finance Letter for your records. We have included two new special covenants that allow any funding for future phases of this project be encumbered upon approval of the "Request for Authorization" and Finance Letter. The Program Supplement Agreement need not be revised for that purpose. However, please note that federal funding will be lost if you proceed with future phase(s) of the project prior to getting the "Authorization to Proceed" with that phase. Please review the covenants and sign both copies of this Agreement and return both to this office, Office of Project Implementation - MS1 within 60 days from the date of this letter. If the signed Agreements are not received back in this office within 60 days, funds will be disencumbered and/or deobligated. Alterations should not be made to the agreement language or funding. Attach your local agency's certified authorizing resolution that clearly identifies the project and the official authorized to execute the agreement. A fully executed copy of the agreement will be returned to you upon ratification by Caltrans. No invoices for reimbursement can be processed until the agreement is fully executed. In accordance to Government Code 16304, Federal funds appropriated by the State budget are available for liquidation only for seven years and the State funds are available only for five years. The attached Finance Letter shows these deadlines as the "Reversion Date". Please ensure that your invoices are submitted at least 60 days prior to the reversion date to avoid any lapse of funds. If your agency is unable to seek reimbursement by this date you may request an extension through a Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA). A CWA is subject to the final approval of the State Department of Finance. If approved, the CWA may extend the deadline for up to one year for federal funds and up to three years for State funds. Please note that Government Code 16304 does not supersede any other more restrictive expenditure deadlines. Your prompt action is requested. If you have questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer. Sincerely, DENIX ANBIAH, Chief Office of Project implementation Division of Local Assistance Enclosure c: DLA AE Project Files (07) DLAE - Kirk Cessna DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCE LETTER Date: 02/2812006 07- DIVISION OF ACCOUNTING Agency: STPL- LA - P 455(00 5 LOCAL PROGRAM ACCOUNTING BRANCH roject No: EA No: 07-93267767700 Attention: City of Diamond Bar ! FINANCE ITEMS— TOTAL COST OF FEDERAL PART. FED. FEDERAL FUND FEDERAL LOCAL WORK COST REIMB % #1 FUND #2 H230 H660 Agency Preliminary Engineering $ $ 00 R1W Acquisition $ $ .00 contract Items: $1 388 325 Contingencies: 138 833 Total: $1527158 Construction $1,057,09 $1,057,09 88.53 $935,84 $ $121 %470.06 $470,06 100.00 $ $470,06 Agency Construction Engineering $ $ 00 b w Totals: $1,527,15 $1,527,15 $935,84 $470,06 $121,24 Fed. Partici 100.00% This Finance Letter was created based on specific financial information provided by the responsible local agency. The following encumbrance history is prepared by Local Assistance Accounting Office and is provided here for local agency's information and action. For questions regarding finance letter, contact: Signature: 1/ Printed Name : Albert Soares Title: HO Area Engineer Telephone No: (916) 653-7140 Remarks: This FL is based on the City's FL dated 212106. F- ACCOUNTING INFORMATION- STPL-5455005 Fund Program Fed/State Encumbrance Amount Approp Year Expenditure Amount Reversion Date 061 L.A. DEMO PROJECTS F $470,064J 2005 $0 06/30112 06DH A. STP-MINALLOC DB F $935,845 2005 $0 06/30/12 I Page 1 of 1 PROGRSUPPLEMENT NO. M004 Date :February 22, 2006 AM to Loc at ion : 07 -LA -0 -DMB R ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT Project Number:STPL-5455(005) FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS NO. 07-5455 E.A. Number: 07-932677 This Program Supplement hereby incorporates the Administering Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Administering Agency and the State on 08/19/96 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Administering Agency on (See copy attached). The Administering Agency further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by State of any funds derived from sources noted below obligated to this project, the Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the Special covenants or Remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: On Grand Ave from 470' w/o Cahill Place to Rolling Knoll Rd (Phase II). TYPE OF WORK: Road rehabilitation and landscape beautification LENGTH: 0 (MILES) Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds 14230 $935,845.00 LOCAL OTHER $1,527,158.00 H660 $470,064.00 $121,249.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By Date Attest Title STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By Chief, Office of Project Implementation Division of Local Assistance Date I hereby certify upon my Personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: �y Accounting officer.Gdti Date $1,405,909.00 Chapter Statutes Item Year Program BC CAtegOry Fund Source AMUNT 38 2005 2660-102-890 2005-2006 20.30.010.680 C 262042 892-F 470,064.00 38 2005 2660-102-890 2005-2006 20.30.010.810 C 262040 892-F 935,845.00 Program Supplement 07-5455-NO04- ISTEA Page 1 of 6 )7-LA-0-DMSR 3TPL-5455(005) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 02/22/2006 1. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the most current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 2. All project repair, replacement and maintenance involving the physical condition and the operation of project improvements referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE, of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and shall be performed at regular intervals and as required for efficient operation of the completed project improvements. 3. This project must be in conformity with the National ITS Architecture, adhere to ITS Standards and undergo Systems Engineering. 4. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act and ONE A-133 if it receives a total of $500,000 or more in federal funds in a single fiscal year. The federal funds received under this project are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning & Research. OMB A-133 superceded OMB A--128 in 1996. A reference to OMB A-128 in a Master Agreement (if any) is superceded by this covenant to conform to OMB A-133. S. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in the Federal -Aid Project Authorization/Agreement or Amendment/Modification (E-76) and accepts any resultant increases in ADMINISTERING AGENCY funds as shown on the Finance Letter, any modification thereof as approved by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of Project Implementation. 6. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to the District Local Assistance Engineer immediately after the project contract award. A copy of the award package shall also be included with the submittal of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY's first invoice for the construction contract to; Department of Transportation Division of Accounting Local Programs Accounting Branch, MS#33 Program Supplement07-5455-M004- ISTEA Page 2 of 6 )7-LA-0-DMBR 3TPL-5455(005) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR RLWARKS P. O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 02/22/2006 Failure to do so will cause a delay in the State processing invoices for the construction phase. Please refer to Section 15.7 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and LPP 01-06. 7. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that any additional funds which might be made available for new phase(s) of work by future Federal obligations will be encumbered on this PROTECT by use of a STATE approved "Authorization to Proceed" and Finance Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that Federal funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amounts obligated by the Federal Highway Administration. S. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds are needed for those future phase(s). 9. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are only available for disbursement for a period of five (5) years and seven (7) years, respectively, from the start of the fiscal year(s) that those funds were appropriated within the State Budget Act. All project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested and is approved by the California Department of Finance per Government Code Section 16304. The exact date of each fund reversion will be reflected in the approved finance letter(s) issued for this project. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement that is not submitted to the Department on or before 60 days after that applicable fixed fund reversion date will not be paid from that fiscal year's encumbered funds because all of these unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting Program Supplement 07-5455-MO04- ISTEA Page 3 of 6 )7-LA-0-DMBR STPL-5455(005) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS on that date. 02/22/2006 Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance, the last date to submit invoices for reimbursed work in each fiscal year is May 15th in order for payment to be made out of those then current appropriations. Project work performed and invoiced after May 15th will be reimbursed only out of available funding that might be encumbered in the subsequent fiscal year, and then only when those funds are actually allocated and encumbered as authorized by the California Transportation Commission and the Department's Accounting Office. 10."ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies that neither the ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor its principals are suspended or debarred at the time of the execution of this agreement. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will notify the STATE immediately, in the event a suspension or a debarment happened after the execution of this agreement." 11.The Administering Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT -assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The Administering Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFE Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts. The Administering Agency's DBE Program, as required by 49 CFE Part 26 and as approved by Caltrans, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recepient of its failure to carry out its approved program, Caltrans may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 es seq.). 12. Billing Cycle ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit invoices in arrears for reimbursement of participating PROJECT costs at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each Program Supplement 07-5455-M004- iSTEA Page 4 of 6 02/22/2006 )7 -LA-0-DMB R 3TPL-5455(005) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS phase by the execution of this PROJECT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or by STATE's future approval of an applicable Finance Letter. The total of all invoiced amounts claimed, plus any required matching funds, must not exceed the actual total cost allowable under this PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT for all authorized and completed PROJECT engineering work, right of way acquisition, and construction. If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit a written explanation (with target billing date and target billing amount) of the absence of PROJECT activity. Should ADMINSTERING AGENCY fail to invoice for participating PROJECT costs incurred (including a written explanation when no invoice is submitted) within one year of the issuance of the PROJECT authorization to proceed by STATE or from the next invoice due date following the last PROJECT invoice, STATE may de -obligate and reassign to another party any unexpended Federal funds without notice to ADMINSTERING AGENCY. STATE may also not process any future request for authorization to proceed submitted by the ADMINSTERING AGENCY. Final Billing ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it shall submit the Final Invoice and Final Detail Estimate within 180 days of PROJECT completion. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's failure to submit these documents will result in sanctions imposed upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY by STATE in accordance with Chapter 17.6, "Consequences For Non -Compliance", of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. De -obligate Federal Funds for Construction Phase ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that if the estimated PROJECT construction cost is less than the obligated amount for construction by more than $50,000, that excess amount of federal funds initially obligated is subject to de -obligation by STATE once the project has been awarded by ADMINSTERING AGENCY. 13.The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse the STATE for the Program supplement07-5455-X1004- ISTEA Page 5 of 6 )7-LA-0-DMBR v 3TPL-5455(005) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 02/22/2006 ADMINISTERING AGENCY share of costs for work requested to be performed by the STATE. Program Supplement07-5455-M004- ISTEA Page 6 of 6 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6_9 (a,h,c.dty, Meeting Date: pail, 4, 2006 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members o he City Council VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager TITLE: APPROVAL OF LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPORT AB 2696 (HUFF), SB 1407 (MARGETT), AND PROPOSITION 81 AND TO OPPOSE SB 411 (ALARCON), SCA 20 (McCLINTOCK), AND SB 1210 (TORLAKSON) BY RESOLUTION AND APPROPRIATE CORRESPONDENCE RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Subcommittee recommends that the City Council approve the proposed responses to the legislative items identified below. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City based on the approval of these actions. BACKGROUND 1 DISCUSSION: The Legislative Subcommittee meets with staff on a regular basis to discuss and analyze proposed legislation and its effects on the City. Following their meeting March 20, 2006, the subcommittee has recommended action be taken on the following pieces of legislation: • AB 2696 (Huff) —This bill was sponsored by the City. Classifies the use of non -motorized or electric scooters as a hazardous recreational activity, and would lower the age limit from 14 to 10 years. The bill would help to limit the liability of cities that allow the use of scooters in public skate paries. Recommended Action: Support The attached resolution and letter of support will be sent to Assemblyman Huff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. • SB 1407 (Margett) — Like AB 2696 (Huff), this bill would also add the use of non -motorized scooters to the list of hazardous recreational activities. This will help to limit the liability of agencies that allow the use of scooters in public skate parks. Recommended Action: Support The attached resolution and letter of support will be sent to Senator Margett, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. • SB 411 (Alarcon) — Eliminates the existing diversion credits given to source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover, which is used as a cover for landfills. By doing so, it will become more difficult for agencies to meet the state mandated 50% waste reduction standard. Recommended Action: Oppose The attached resolution and letter of opposition will be sent to Senator Alarcon, the L.A. County Sanitation District, Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, and the League of California Cities — L.A. Division. • SCA 20 (McClintock) — Limits eminent domain to properties that will serve a public use. Any proceeding that is designed for economic development use would require the consent of the property owner before condemnation. Would severely impact redevelopment and economic development efforts. Recommended Action: Oppose The attached resolution and letter of opposition will be sent to Senator McClintock, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. • SB 1210 (Torlakson) —Revises state law to state that eminent domain does not fit public use when transferred to a non-governmental entity for purposes of economic development or an attempt to increase tax revenue. Limits the options of cities to pursue beneficial redevelopment of economic development opportunities. Recommended Action: Oppose The attached resolution and letter of opposition will be sent to Senator Torlakson, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. • Proposition 81 (The Library Bond of 2006) — The group Californians for Literacy & Community Libraries has requested our support for the 2006 Library Bond Initiative, which will be on the ballot for the voters in June, 2006. The initiative would authorize the sale of $600 million in bonds, and would benefit cities and districts throughout the state that wish to apply for funds to construct or improve their libraries. Recommended Action: Support The attached resolution will be sent to the Californians for Literacy & Community Libraries. Prepared by: ►G t iy�- Ryan Lean, Senior Management Analyst Attachments: 1. Legislative Subcommittee Watch List — 4.4.06 David Doyle, ss City Manager 2. Resolution and letter of support for AB 2696 (Huff) to Assemblyman Huff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. 3. Resolution and letter of support for SB 1407 (Margett) to Senator Margett, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. 4. Resolution and letter of opposition to SB 411 (Alarcon) to Senator Alarcon, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, the LA County Sanitation District, and the League of California Cities. 5. Resolution and letter of opposition to SCA 20 (McClintock) to Senator McClintock, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. 6. Resolution and letter of opposition to SB 1210 (Torlakson) to Senator Torlakson, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities. 7. Resolution in support of Proposition 81 to the Californians for Literacy and Community Libraries 2006 Legislative Subcommittee Watch List 2696 Huff This bill would classify the use Recommended Bill Author Description Potential Impacts Status Action AB In Senate 2696 Huff This bill would classify the use If passed, the bill would lessen f=irst Read 2.27 Support of non -motorized or electric the liability of local agencies 3.2 separated greenwaste that operate public skate scooters as a hazardous parks. recreational activity. The bill and recycling. By eliminating would also lower the age limit these credits, it will become from 14 years to 10. very difficult for local agencies SB In Senate 1407 Margett Like AB 2696, this bill would If passed, the bill would lessen Judiciary Support classify the use of the liability of local agencies 3.2 separated greenwaste that operate public skate non -motorized ("push) scooters parks. as a hazardous recreational and recycling. By eliminating activity. The bill is designed to these credits, it will become apply mainly to the popular very difficult for local agencies "razor" scooters. to SB Returned to Sec. 411 Alarcon This bill would eliminate exisitng When greenwaste credits of Oppose diversion credits given to source were established in 1996, they Senate 1.31 separated greenwaste were designed to encourage alternative daily cover. curbside greenwaste collection This material is used as a and recycling. By eliminating cover for landfills_ these credits, it will become very difficult for local agencies to LA Co. Sanitation District meet the state mandated 50% requests opposition waste reduction standard. Prop. In Sen. Jud. 81 McClintock Since SB 1161 (Alpert) passed, Provides communities in CA Will appear on the Support Proposition 81 will appear on the an opportunity to apply for June ballot SB June ballot. Prop. 81 is the 2006 state grant funds to construct 1210 Torlakson Library Bond Act, and if passed or improve library facilities. by CA voters, would authorize Applicants must match 35%. the sale of a max. of $600 million Up to the remaining 65% may in bonds to fund library construction. be funded by grants. The group Californians for Literacy & Community Libraries has requested the City's endorsement. SCA In Sen. Jud. 20 McClintock These bills are designed to limit the Limits the rights of cities to Comm. Oppose use of eminent domain by agencies. use eminent domain when SB pursuing economic 1210 Torlakson development or redevelopment SCA 20 limits eminent domain to opportunities. properties that will serve a public use. Any proceeding that is designed for economic development would require the consent of the property owner before condemnation. SB 1210 revises law to state that eminent domain does not fit public use when transferred to a non-gov't entity for purposes of econ. dev. or an attempt to increase tax revenue. (Among many other related provisions) RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING AB 2696 (HUFF), WHICH CLASSIFIES THE USE OF NON -MOTORIZED AND ELECTRIC SCOOTERS AS A HAZARDOUS RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY AND LOWERS THE AGE THRESHOLD FROM 14 TO 10 YEARS WHEREAS, the use of non -motorized and electric scooters has exploded in popularity among the youth in communities throughout the state, WHEREAS, like skateboards, scooters are often used to perform stunts and tricks that can lead to injury; and WHEREAS, non -motorized scooters are often used in public skate park facilities; and WHEREAS, Assemblyman Huff has introduced Assembly Bill 2696 (AB 2696), which if passed, would classify the use of non -motorized or electric scooters as a hazardous recreational activity, and lower the age threshold from 14 to 10 years; and WHEREAS, AB 2696 would help to protect the interest of cities by limiting their liability for injuries related to the use of non -motorized and electric scooters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar SUPPORTS AB 2696 (Huff). SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to SUPPORT AB 2696 (Huff). SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following.. Assemblyman Bob Huff League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL, 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4thday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar March 29, 2006 The Honorable Assemblyman Bob Huff State Capitol P.O. Box 942849 Sacramento, CA 94249-0060 RE: City of Diamond Bar Support of AB 2696 Dear Assemblyman Huff Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill, AB 2696 (Huff), which would classify the use of non -motorized and electric scooters as a hazardous recreational activity. The bill would also lower the age threshold from 14 to 10 years. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they support AB 2696. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to support AB 2696. By identifying the use of scooters as a hazardous recreational activity, cities are able to realize a lower level of liability for injuries suffered in the course of scooter use. With so many young people participating in this activity in public skate parks and other facilities, it is imperative that local agencies have this level of security. The City of Diamond Bar thanks you for your willingness to heed our request to carry this bill. It is our strong belief that it is in the best interests of cities throughout the state. The City of Diamond Bar supports AB 2696 (Huff). Respectfully, Carol Herrera Mayor CC: Assemblyman Bob Huff Joe A. Gonsalves & Son California League of Cities City Council/CM/ACM RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING AB 1407 (MARGETT), WHICH CLASSIFIES THE USE OF NON -MOTORIZED SCOOTERS AS A HAZARDOUS RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY WHEREAS, the use of non -motorized scooters has exploded in popularity among the youth in communities throughout the state, WHEREAS, like skateboards, scooters are often used to perform stunts and tricks that can lead to injury; and WHEREAS, non -motorized scooters are often used in public skate park facilities; and WHEREAS, Senator Margett has introduced Senate Bill 1407 (SB 1407), which if passed, would classify the use of non -motorized scooters as a hazardous recreational activity; and WHEREAS, SB 1407 would help to protect the interest of cities by limiting their liability for injuries related to the use of non -motorized scooters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar SUPPORTS SB 1407 (Margett). SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to SUPPORT SB 1407 (Margett). SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following: Senator Bob Margett League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 4" DAY OF APRIL, 2006 Carol Herrera, Mayor 1, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4thday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar March 29, 2006 The Honorable Senator Bob Margett California State Capitol, Room 3082 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: City of Diamond Bar Support of SB 1407 Dear Senator Margett: Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill, SB 1407 (Margett), which would classify the use of non -motorized scooters as a hazardous recreational activity. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they support SB 1407. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to support SB 1407. By identifying the use of scooters as a hazardous recreational activity, cities are able to realize a lower level of liability for injuries suffered in the course of scooter use. With so many young people participating in this activity in public skate parks and other facilities, it is imperative that local agencies have this level of security. The City of Diamond Bar thanks you for your willingness to carry this bill. It is our strong belief that it is in the best interests of cities throughout the state. The City of Diamond Bar supports SB 1407 (Margett). Senator Bob Margett Joe A. Gonsalves & Son California League of Cities City Council/CM/ACM RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING SB 411 (ALARCON) WHICH ELIMINATES DIVERSION CREDITS GIVEN TO SOURCE SEPARATED GREENWASTE ALTERNATIVE DAILY COVER WHEREAS, Senator Alarcon has introduced SB 411, which would eliminate the existing diversion credit given to source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover; and WHEREAS, source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover is used to cover deposited waste at landfills, and has been consistently proven to effectively protect public health and safety and the environment, while extending the life of landfills; and WHEREAS, since 1996, agencies have received diversion credits for curbside greenwaste collection for use as source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover, helping them to meet the state mandated waste reduction rate; and WHEREAS, the elimination of these diversion credits would significantly hamper the ability of many local jurisdictions to meet the state mandates, making them subject to steep fines and penalties; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar OPPOSES SB 411 (Alarcon). SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to OPPOSE SB 411 (Alarcon). SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following: Senator Richard Alarcon League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son Los Angeles County Sanitation District PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 4t" DAY OF APRIL, 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor i, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4 thday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar March 29, 2006 The Honorable Senator Richard Alarcon State Capitol, Room 4035 Sacramento,CA 95814 RE: City of Diamond Bar Opposition to SB 411 Dear Senator Alarcon: Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill, SB 411, which would eliminate diversion credits for source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they oppose SB 411. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006 the Diamond Bar City Council voted to oppose SB 411. Source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover has proven to be an effective and efficient method of covering landfills. This material helps protect public safety and health as well as extend the life of landfills, which saves taxpayer money. Since 1996, local jurisdictions have received valuable diversion credits for curbside collection of greenwaste that is converted into source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover. If these credits are eliminated, as proposed in SB 411, many agencies will not be able to reach the state mandated waste diversion rate of 50%, and will be subject to severe fines and penalties. While we support the goal of SB 411 to develop and stimulate the composting industry, it will take time to develop and build the necessary infrastructure and markets that the composting industry needs. The elimination of diversion credits for source separated greenwaste alternative daily cover will do away with an important way to manage waste in a positive way. For these reasons, the City of Diamond Bar is opposed to SB 411 Sincerely, Carol Herrera Mayor CC: Senator Richard Alarcon Joe A. Gonsalves & Son League of California Cities City Council/CM/ACM RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING SCA 20 (McCLINTOCK), WHICH PROPOSES A CHANGE IN THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION RELATED TO EMINENT DOMAIN WHEREAS, Senator McClintock has introduced Senate Constitutional Amendment 20 (SCA 20), which, if passed, would propose a change to the state constitution in regards to eminent domain; and WHEREAS, SCA 20 would provide that private property may be taken only for a stated public use, and not without the consent of the owner for purposes of economic development, increasing tax revenue, or any other private use, nor for maintaining the present use by a different owner; and WHEREAS, SCA 20 would also provide that if property ceases to be used for the stated public use, the former owner would have the right to reacquire the property for its fair market value; WHEREAS, SCA 20 would severely limit the ability of local agencies to proceed with redevelopment and economic development that benefit the entire community, WHEREAS, eminent domain has been used effectively in California for years to provide affordable housing and eliminate blight. WHEREAS, the State of California already has strong laws on the books restricting the use of eminent domain and protecting the rights of home and property owners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar OPPOSES SCA 20 (McClintock). SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to OPPOSE SCA 20 (McClintock). SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following: Senator Tom McClintock League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL, 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4thday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar March 29, 2006 The Honorable Senator Tom McClintock State Capitol, Room 3070 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: City of Diamond Bar Opposition to SCA 20 Dear Senator McClintock: Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed state constitutional amendment, SCA 20, in regards to eminent domain rights. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they oppose SCA 20. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to oppose SCA 20. Introduced in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling the case of Kelo vs. New London in Connecticut, SCA 20 is one of many recent proposals that would severely limit the use of eminent domain by public entities. However, the state of California already has very strong laws on the books protecting the rights of home and property owners that restrict the use of eminent domain. Currently, cities or redevelopment agencies may only use eminent domain in rare circumstances when there is a clearly defined case of blight under state law. California law already prevents cities from using eminent domain to take land that may be more valuable for other uses. By limiting the uses of eminent domain even further, agencies will lose a primary tool used to improve downtrodden areas and improve the lives of residents in those neighborhoods. After the federal government, redevelopment is the largest source of affordable housing projects in California, and has revitalized many communities economically and aesthetically. Redevelopment projects, few of which have no alternative but to use eminent domain, are the leading source of affordable housing in the state, provide hundreds of thousands of jobs to working Californians, and help to build a strong economy. With housing costs skyrocketing, the state's economy in recovery, and many Californians out of work it is imperative that cities retain these powers to better their communities should the need arise. For these reasons, the City of Diamond Bar is opposed to SCA 20. Sincerely, Carol Herrera Mayor CC: Senator Tom McClintock Joe A. Gonsalves & Son California League of Cities City Council/CM/ACM RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING SB 1210 (TORLAKSON) WHICH WOULD REVISE CALIFORNIA LAW RELATING TO THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN WHEREAS, Senator Torlakson has introduced Senate Bill 1210 (SB 1210), which, if passed, would revise California law relating to the use of eminent domain; and WHEREAS, SB 1210 would primarily provide that public use does not include the taking of property in order to transfer it to a nongovernmental entity for purposes of economic development or increasing tax revenues, except as specifically provided under the Community Redevelopment Law, among other related provisions; and WHEREAS, SB 1210 would severely limit the ability of local agencies to proceed with redevelopment and economic development that benefit the entire community, and; WHEREAS, eminent domain has been used effectively in California for years to provide affordable housing, eliminate blight, revitalize business districts, and provide jobs; and; WHEREAS, the State of California already has strong laws on the books restricting the use of eminent domain and protecting the rights of home and property owners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar OPPOSES SB 1210 (Torlakson). SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to OPPOSE SB 1210 (Torlakson). SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following: Senator Tom Torlakson League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4"' DAY OF APRIL, 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4 1hday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar March 29, 2006 The Honorable Senator Tom Torlakson State Capitol, Room 3070 Sacramento, CA 95514 RE: City of Diamond Bar Opposition to SB 1210 Dear Senator Torlakson: Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill, SB 1210, in regards to the use of eminent domain. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they oppose SB 1210. Subsequently, on April 4, 2006, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to oppose SB 1210. Introduced in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling the case of Kelo vs. New London in Connecticut, AB 1210 is one of many recent proposals that would severely limit the use of eminent domain by public entities. However, the state of California already has very strong laws on the books protecting the rights of home and property owners that restrict the use of eminent domain. Currently, cities or redevelopment agencies may only use eminent domain in rare circumstances when there is a clearly defined case of blight under state law. California law already prevents cities from using eminent domain to take land that may be more valuable for other uses. With state funding uncertain, cities must rely on sales tax revenues to provide the services that residents have come to expect. With this in mind, economic development of blighted areas is a very important option for local agencies to have. By preventing cities and redevelopment agencies from the option of using eminent domain to pursue economic development opportunities when the proper conditions are met, a primary tool used to improve downtrodden areas and improve the lives of residents in those neighborhoods is lost. After the federal government, redevelopment is the largest source of affordable housing projects in California, and has revitalized many communities economically and aesthetically. Redevelopment projects, few of which have no alternative but to use eminent domain, are the leading source of affordable housing in the state, provide hundreds of thousands of jobs to working Californians, and help to build a strong economy. With housing costs skyrocketing, the state's economy in recovery, and many Californians out of work it is imperative that cities retain these powers to better their communities should the need arise. For these reasons, the City of Diamond Bar is opposed to SCA 20. Sincerely, Carol Herrera Mayor CC: Senator Tom McClintock Joe A. Gonsalves & Son/California League of Cities City Council/CM/ACM RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 81, THE LIBRARY BOND ACT OF 2006 WHEREAS, Governor Schwarzenegger has signed SB 1161 (Alpert), the "California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2006" into law, and; WHEREAS, the proposal will appear on the June 2006 ballot as Proposition 81, WHEREAS, if approved by the voters of the state of California, Proposition 81 would authorize the sale of $600 million in bonds to assist local agencies in the construction or renovation of library facilities, and; WHEREAS, if approved, cities throughout the state would have the opportunity to apply for funding for local projects, and; WHEREAS, cities throughout the state continue to have ongoing needs for library services and facilities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar SUPPORTS the passage of Proposition 81. SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar asks all elected local and State officials to SUPPORT Proposition 81. SECTION 3 That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following: Californians for Literacy and Community Libraries League of California Cities Joe A. Gonsalves & Son PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL, 2006. Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 4thday of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: qe lei -D r, S-" DATE: '� 7 0 ADDRESS: -2-3306 C/e Coyl e -Dr PHONE: n61�° r�057� ORGANIZATION: AG EN DA #/SUBJ ECT: C I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. I� TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. 1 Sianature