HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/3/2005Tuesday, May 3, 2005
5:00 p.m. — Study Session — CC -8
6:30 p.m. - Regular Meeting
The Government Center
South Coast Air Quality Management District/
Main Auditorium
21865 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Mayor Wen Chang
Mayor ProTem Debby O'Connor
Council Member Carol Herrera
Council Member Bob Zirbes
City Manager Linda C. Lowry
City Attorney Michael Jenkins
City Clerk Linda C. Lowry
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding
an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance
or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform
the City Cierk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting,
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers,
The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same.
DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
Welcome to the meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. Meetings of the Diamond Bar City
Council are open to the public and are cablecast Iive on Channel 3. You are invited to attend and
participate.
PUBLIC INPUT
Members of the public may address the Council on any item of business on the agenda during the
time the item is taken up by the Council. In addition, members of the public may during the
Public Comment period address the Council on any matter not on the agenda and within the
Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Persons wishing to speak should submit a speaker slip to
the City Clerk.
Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Mayor determines otherwise.
The Mayor may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people wishing to speak, the
complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and any other relevant consideration.
Speakers may address the Council only once on an agenda item, except during public hearings,
when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a rebuttal.
Public comments must be directed to the City Council. Behavior that disrupts the orderly conduct
of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the Council chambers.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL
Agendas for regular City Council meetings available 72 hours prior to the meeting and are posted
in the City's regular posting locations and on the City's website at www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us. A
full agenda packet is available for review during the meeting in the foyer just outside the Council
chambers. The City Council may take action on any item listed on the agenda.
ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE DISABLED
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot
access the podium in order to make a public comment. Sign language interpretation is available
by providing the City Clerk three business days' notice in advance of a meeting. PIease
telephone (909) 839-7000 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30
a.m. to 4.30 p.m. on Fridays.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of agendas, rules of the Council, CassetteNideo tapes of meetings (909) 839-7016
Computer access to agendas: www.ci.diarnond-bar.ca.us
General Information: (909) 839-7000
THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY ADELPHIA FOR AIRING ON
CHANNEL 3 AND BY REMAINING .IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR
PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS MEETING WILL BE RE -BROADCAST
EVERY SATURDAY. AT, 9:00 A.M. AND EVERY TUESDAY AT 8:00 P.M. ON
CHANNEL 3.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
May 3, 2005
Next Resolution No, 2005-21
Next Ordinance No. 06(2005)
STUDY SESSION: 5:00 p.m. Room CC -8
No. Discussion of Cable TV Franchise and local programming needs.
► Pathfinder Road Beautification
► Budget Calendar Discussion
► Library
Public Comments
CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor
INVOCATION: Ahmad H. Sakr, Ph.D.
Islamic Education Center
ROLL CALL: Council Members Herrera, Zirbes, Mayor Pro
Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
1.1 Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Robert Gauthier, resident and
winner of a Pulitzer Prize (Public Service) for the series of stories depicting
the level of care to patients at the Martin Luther King Jr./Drew Medical Center.
1.2 Proclaiming May 2-8, 2005 as "Public Service Week."
1.3 Proclaiming month of May, 2005 as "Asian Pacific American Heritage Month."
1.4 Proclaiming month of May, 2005 as "Water Awareness Month."
MAY 3, 2005 PAGE 2
1.5 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the 2005 Cottontail Country
Classic Tournament Committee.
BUSINESS OF THE MONTH:
1.6 Presentation of City Tile to Goodrich Corporation, Hoists & Winches Power
Systems, as Business of the Month, May, 2005.
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular
meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly
address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public
that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City
Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally
cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a
Speaker's Card and cive it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary).
There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Cit Council.
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City
Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no
action on such matters may take place.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — May 10, 2005 — 7:00 p.m.,
Auditorium, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr.
5.2 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING — May 12,
2005 — 7:00 p.m., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865
Copley Dr.
5.3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — May 17, 2005 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium,
AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.1 City Council Minutes:
6.1.1 Study Session of April 19, 2005 -Approve as submitted.
6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 19, 2005 — Approve as submitted.
6.2 Traffic and Transportation Commission Minutes — March 10,
2005 - Receive and file.
MAY 3, 2005 PAGE 3
6.3 Ratification of Check Register — Ratify Check Register dated May 3,
2005 in the amount of $938,383.31.
6.4 Treasurer's Statement- Month of March, 2005- Review and Approve.
6.5 Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -XX: Authorizing the Renewal of the General
Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles.
Recommended Action: Adopt.
Requested by: City Manager
6.6 Appropriate $25,000 From Prop A (Transportation Funds) for
Development of Online Transit Pass Software.
Recommended Action: Appropriate Funds.
Requested by: IS Division
6.7 Approve Plans and Specifications and Award Construction Contract in
the Amount of $570,972 to Macadee Electrical Construction; and
Authorize a Contingency Amount of $57,000 for Contract Change
Orders to be Approved by the City Manager, for a Total Authorization of
$627,972 for Construction of Traffic Signal Modifications (Left -Turn
Signals) on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Sunset Crossing Rd., Northbound Sr -
57 On Ramp, and Cold Springs Ln.; and Construction of New Traffic
Signals at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Maple Hill Rd. and Pathfinder Rd. and
Peaceful Hills Rd.
Recommended Action: Approve and Award.
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.8 Approval of Appropriation of $8,000 for FY 2004105 Expanded Summer
Day Camp Program
Recommended Action: Approve and Appropriate Funds.
Requested by: Community Services Division
6.9 Legislative Sub -Committee Recommendations:
Recommended Action: Approve responses.
Requested by: Legislative Sub -Committee
MAY 3, 2005 PAGE 4
6.10 Appropriate Necessary Funds from the Integrated Waste Management
Special Fund and Approve Consultant Services Contract with Hilton,
Farnkopf and Hobson in the amount of $35,300 for Audit of Solid Waste
Hauler Services and Authorize a Contingency Amount of $5,000, to be
Approved by the City Manager, for a Total Authorization Amount of
$40,300.
Recommended Action: Appropriate Funds and Approve Contract.
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.11 Approve General Fund Reserve Appropriation for Purchase of Copiers
for City Hall in the Amount of $35,000.
Recommended Action: Approve.
Requested by: City Manager
6.12 Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -XX Accepting an Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication for Road Purposes from Diamond Hills Ranch Maintenance
Corporation, the Owner of the Property Located at the Terminus of
Highcrest Dr.
Recommended Action: Adopt.
Requested by: Public Works Division
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 Adopt Resolution No. 2005 -XX: Determining that Undergrounding
Utilities is in the General Public Interest and Establishing the Brea
Canyon Rd./Washington Street Underground Utility District.
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, Receive Testimony and
Adopt.
Requested by: Public Works Division
7.2 (a) Approve for First Reading Ordinance No. 0X(2005) Establishing
Business Registration and Amending the Diamond Bar Municipal Code.
MAY 3, 2005 PAGE 5
(b) Resolution No. 2005 -XX: Establishing a Fee for Business
Registration and Business Registration Renewal and Amending the
Existing fee Schedule to Include Business Registration Fees.
Items (a) and (b) can both be discussed in the public hearing. Separate motions should be
made to approve the first reading of the Ordinance and adoption of the New Registration
fee.
Recommended Action: Open Public Hearing, Receive Testimony.
Requested by: Planning Division
8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None
9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
City of Diamond Bar
Memo
To: Linda Lowry, City Manager
From: Ryan McLean, Senior Management Analyst
CC: Dave Doyle, Assistant City Manager
Date: April 29, 2005
Re: 513105 Study Session — Discussion of Cable TV Franchise
Linda,
As an aid to the discussion at the May 3, 2005 City Council Study Session on the City's
Cable N Franchise and local programming needs, l have attached a document
explaining possible monthly and yearly pass -on costs to Diamond Bar subscribers.
These pass -0n costs, amortized over the period of the franchise agreement, would only
be assessed if the City chooses to collect money from our cable provider to purchase
new capital for the production of new programming.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Ryan
Estimated Adelphia Payment Amortization
Amount Months Subscribers IMonthly Cost to Subscriber I YearlY Cost to Subscriber
$60,000* 29 10,719 Notes
$0'19 $2.32 $50,000 u front, plus
(4105-9107) $5,000 each oft the
next 2 years until the
current franchise
expires 9/14107
84 1 10,719 $0.09 $1.13 Fyear
00 u front, Plus $5,000 per
9/07-9/14 p P
Estimated or seven years over the life
time period new seven year franchise
100,000"** 12 10,719 $0.78 $9.36
Estimated cost to
raise $100,000 per
year for new original
programming on DBTV
City for capital equipment purchases. Adelphia would then be liable to pay an additional $5,000
*By failing to have proper studio facilities in Diamond Bar, we can request that Adelphia must provide an initial payment of $50,000 to the
per year for the remainder of the franchise
agreement. Adelphia may pass these costs along to subscribers on an amortized monthly basis. The figures here represent these added
costs to Diamond Bar subscribers if the City chose to collect the payment over the remainder of the current agreement, which is due to
expire September 19, 2007 approximately 2 years remaining).
**These figures represent the costs passed on to Diamond Bar subscribers if the payment was requested over the course of a new seven
year franchise agreement.
***This figure is a staff estimate of the costs needed to produce quality original programming on DBTV for one year, and the costs passed
on to Diamond Bar residents.
Study Session Report
Item 1
TO: City Council
FROM: Linda Lowry, City Manager'/ j -�t..
SUBJECT: Cable Franchise Report J
DATE: April 3o, 2005
Staff has been reviewing the cable franchise agreement with Adelphia with particular
attention to Adelphia's obligations to provide a base level of customer service and to
provide studio facilities in Diamond Bar.
It is appropriate for the City Council to be informed about the results of the most recent
review, and to discuss the matter with respect to obtaining future compliance with the
agreement as well as compensation for past performance issues.
Staff will make an oral presentation about the recent findings and seek input from the
Council.
Adelphia has been informed that this item has been placed on the study session agenda.
Study Session #2
MEMORANDUM '
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
David G. Liu, Director of Public Works
VIA:
Linda C. Lowry, City Managers i-
DATE:
May 3, 2005
RE:
PATHFINDER ROAD BEAUTIFICATION
CC:
Jim DeStefano, Assistant City Manager
David Doyle, Assistant City Manager
Funding Pathfinder Road improvements from State Route 57 east to Diamond Bar
Boulevard has been identified by the City Council as one of the objectives for FY 2004-
05. This objective is not currently budgeted and will require appropriation of funds for
any portion of the project to commence. To properly plan for this project, funding and a
defined scope of work with project limits/phasing will be necessary.
A preliminary cost estimate of a block wall along the south side of Pathfinder Road,
between Evergreen Springs Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard (approximately 1,g00
linear feet), is $500,000. This amount includes design and construction management
services. As mentioned, this project is not currently budgeted in this fiscal year.
In 2004, an appropriation request was submitted to Congressman Miller for funding.
And, in November of 2004, the Congress approved $1,000,000 to fund the rehabilitation
of Grand Avenue. In a recent update received by the City, we were informed by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) staff that because of the current bill limitation
they can only allocate 8/12th of the $1,000,000. For the Grand Avenue Project, the
amount currently available for obligation is $661,333 and will be handled through
Caltrans.
In a recent site visit with Council Member Zirbes, a desire to establish a consistent
streetscape theme along Pathfinder Road between the westerly City limit and Diamond
Bar Boulevard was noted. Staff consulted and obtained a fee proposal for a conceptual
plan from the City's on-call consultant, David Evans and Associates, for a not -to -exceed
amount of $14,000.
The initial efforts will be to thoroughly review the physical conditions/limitations and
provide enhancement opportunities of Pathfinder Road for visual impacts, pedestrians,
Page Two
Memo to Council
May 3, 2005
motorists, and the relationship of adjacent developments. To help visualize these
preliminary design ideas (walls, fencing, railings, and landscaping), four (4) photo sims
Prepared in a month.
sections and four (4) photo sims elevations with construction cost estimates, can be
At this time, there are four (4) options for the Council's consideration:
Option 1- To authorize an expenditure amount of $14,000 for David Evans and
Associates to proceed with a conceptual plan for Pathfinder Road between the westerly
City Limit and Diamond Bar Boulevard;
Option 2- To appropriate $500,000 for a block wall along Pathfinder Road between SR -
57 and Diamond Bar Blvd. This includes design and construction management services
without a concept plan as identified in Option 1;
Option 3- To appropriate $550,000 to proceed with a conceptual pian prior to design
and construction of a block wall along Pathfinder Road between SR -57 and Diamond
Bar Blvd. This is basically a combination of Options 1 and 2; or
Option 4- To do nothing.
A "photo album" of the existing conditions along Pathfinder Road has been compiled
and is attached herewith for your review and discussion. Upon receiving the Council's
comments tonight, staff will bring back an appropriate recommendation for Council's
approval.
Attachments
STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 3
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 4
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
APRIL 19, 2005
Agenda No. 6.1.1
STUDY SESSION: Mayor Chang called the Study Session to order at
5:30 p.m. in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA.
Present: Council Members Herrera. Zirbes, Mayor Pro Tem
O'Connor and Mayor Chang.
Also Present: Linda Lowry, City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City
Attorney; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; James DeStefano, Assistant City
Manager; David Liu, Director of Public Works; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Ryan
McLean, Community Services Coordinator; Phyllis Young, Los Angeles County Library;
and consultants Frank Tripepi, Eric Scriven, Chris Fisher, Muni Financial and Dr. Allan
Heslop, Municipal Demographics.
► Financing the Diamond Bar Library:
CM/Lowry introduced Muni Financial consultants who were present to discuss
possible financing options for construction of a new library.
Frank Tripepi introduced his colleagues and stated that in discussing this matter
with staff in detail it would appear to him that one of the best financing options is
a parcel tax for the library and the operation thereof.
Chris Fisher explained the parcel tax model. During discussions with staff two
weeks ago it was determined that one of the goals was to have an option that
would be placed on the ballot this November in order to move forward as quickly
as possible. The other goal was to provide flexibility through a means for
financing facilities and for maintenance and operation of the facility. The
discussion included a community facilities district and a special "parcel" tax and it
was decided that a parcel tax would be appropriate because it is more flexible, a
quicker process and simpler to implement. In order for the parcel tax to hit the
ballot in November the resolutions would have to be passed by the middle of
August. Once the tax was implemented the City would administer the program on
an ongoing basis. The first step would be to create an ordinance that would
contain language and methodology for taxing the parcels within the City. The
next step would be to pass a resolution calling for an election. Once the election
was complete a second resolution would certify the results.
Dr. Heslop, National Demographics, introduced his firm which performs surveys.
His firm spent the past 25 years focusing on local governments and the problems
affecting them. National Demographics has enjoyed a strong and lengthy
collaboration with MuniFinancial and its personnel. Surveys are meant to garner
what is possible, the best possible way to approach a particular issue (parcel
tax), identifying center of community leadership and adjusting the CPR range.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 2 CC STUDY SESSION
ACM/Doyle responded to C/Herrera that the recommended last date for Council's
decision to place the parcel tax issue on the ballot would be early July. The drop -
dead date is August 12.
Dr. Heslop indicated to C/Herrera that ideally a telephone survey should last less
than 15 minutes, Once the City and Muni Financial agreed upon a survey
instrument it would take less than one week to put the survey into the field, bring
out the data and to analyze and issue a report, He cautioned that it was
imperative that the instrument be created with full input from staff. Dr. Heslop
assured C/Herrera that the information would be available for Council review by
the second June meeting and render a decision by early July as to whether it
would be placed on the ballot.
Dr. Heslop assured MPT/O'Connor that his firm employs bilingual surveyors.
MPT/O'Connor explained that in the past the City received complaints about
surveyors who were difficult to understand. Dr. Heslop responded that his firm
uses people who have been doing surveys for a long time, who have been
trained and who have clear enunciation and not foreign accents. There will be no
such problem with his firm.
MPT/O'Connor asked for explanation of the Community Facility District.
Chris Miller explained that the Community Facility District is also known as the
Mello -Roos special tax. The Mello -Roos law was passed in 1984 as a means to
give the City the ability to finance facilities and services. It takes about 120 days
to meet the legal requirements to implement a Community Facility District tax. He
explained the process. Once the law is passed the tax must be used for the
specific purpose for which it was intended; Council must provide an annual report
to the public stating what the City collected, how it was spent and what the status
is of any facilities and/or services being financed with the tax.
ACM/Doyle responded to MPT/O'Connor that he was not aware of the next
County election date after November 2005. If the matter were held over to June
2006 for example, the City would be required to pay the County $50,000 for
inclusion.
C/Zirbes asked what kind of financial information would be needed from the City
to come up with the total package cost.
Dr. Heslop explained that one of the functions of the survey is to assess
reactions to a range of numbers.
C/Zirbes asked if the survey could garner feedback as to whether the residents
would prefer to have a County run facility or a D.B. run facility.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 3 CC STUDY SESSION
Dr. Heslop said the question could be asked but he cautioned that there should
be no education during the survey because it could create a false level of
awareness. He felt it was important to keep the questions as simple as possible
and to not take for granted any high level of information on the part of the
respondent. Dr. Heslop explained that 80 percent of their surveys are done with
one form or another of high -propensity "tight" voters who voted in the last two of
the last three elections.
In response to M/Chang Dr. Heslop said that the City of Perris for example did
not have a clear idea of what it wanted to do and the survey showed them that
whatever they decided to do it would potentially fail. In other cases $5.00 could
make a difference or the exact elements of the case needed to justify the
assessment is crucial. The survey will determine the way in which D.B. should
proceed if at all.
Public Comments:
Clyde Hennessee felt there were a lot of people who wanted a library but
wondered if they were willing to sacrifice the City's security in order to do so. D.B.
is facing significant loss of tax revenue this year and now the discussion is to
spend another $10-15 million. During the last three years his taxes have
increased about 30 percent and it was unlikely that he would vote for a library in
D.B. when there were two or three facilities within four or five miles of the City.
He was not refuting the need for a new library, just the cost.
Kathleen Newe agreed there were people who felt there was no need for a
library. She wanted to know when in the timeline of events the opportunity would
present itself for outreach to the community to let them know that they currently
pay for fire, sheriff and library.
Marsha Hawkins appreciated the information presented during tonight's study
session and felt the survey would assist the City to provide the necessary and
proper community outreach.
At the request of ACM/Doyle, CA/Jenkins explained that the period of time during
which a campaign would take place would be from the time the City Council
decided to put the measure on the ballot. From that point forward City funds
cannot be used other than to provide factual information. Funds used for
campaign purposes would have to be non-public funds. City Council and City
Council Members could communicate their positions and individual Council
Members can use their own time to campaign. City staff cannot engage in any
form of campaigning and is limited to providing only factual information about the
measure, what the money would be used for and so forth.
CM/Lowry said that although the contract and sub -contract proposal falls within
the City Manager's spending authority she wanted specific direction as to
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 4 CC STUDY SESSION
whether or not the Council was comfortable with her engaging the services of
MuniFinancial and their subcontractor as outlined in the exhibit.
C/Zirbes said he was not comfortable with the funds coming out of the Economic
Development budget. He appreciated the information presented tonight and
wanted to know if staff had talked with Supervisor Knabe about the potential of
obtaining $7.5 million toward construction of a library and he would prefer to wait
for feedback from Supervisor Knabe before proceeding to authorizing $25,000 for
a study and a survey.
C/Herrera said that she too was very uncomfortable about using Economic
Development money and it was her impression that the next step was to talk with
Supervisor Knabe.
CM/Lowry explained that staff felt that in order to stay within the timeline all
options should remain on the table including the option of what type of tax it
would be. To be very candid, the response from Supervisor Knabe's office gave
CM/Lowry no reason to believe that D.B. would receive any monies toward
construction of the library. As Council requested, staff prepared a letter and faxed
it to Supervisor Knabe's office. Since it was just sent, there has been no official
response.
MPT/O'Connor said that Council requested that two Council Members meet with
Supervisor Knabe.
CM/Lowry responded that the Council's request for a special meeting was
included in the letter.
C/Zirbes felt that although there was a desire to get a new facility built there were
other options to explore. He felt that attempts to get the item on the November
ballot was too quick and too soon to get all of the facts together about what type
of facility was needed, what would it actually cost, what is the cost of the money
to build the library, what is the cost to operate the facility, who will operate the
facility, etc. Additionally, the Governor plans to have a lot of items on the ballot
and D.B. is holding a City Council election in November so now the library has
become politicized instead of it being the primary issue. In his opinion, it would
make more sense to schedule the matter for March 2006 for example to give the
City more time to properly educate the residents and why a new facility would be
a key component in a community wherein education is paramount.
CA/Jenkins explained that there are two kinds of taxes, a special tax and a
general tax. The only opportunity the City would have to levy a general tax would
be in November of odd numbered years. If the City chose not to move forward in
2005 it would have to wait until November 2007. A special tax could be done at
any time. A general tax requires a majority vote of the electorate and the
revenues can be used for any purpose. A special tax requires a two-thirds vote of
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 5 CC STUDY SESSION
the electorate and it may only be used for the specific purpose identified in the
tax measure.
CA/Jenkins responded to MPT/O'Connor that depending on the survey outcome
the City could do a special tax wherein it included a laundry list to include a
library, sports center, etc. or it could do a general tax to be used for any specific
purpose.
M/Chang agreed with staff that Council should move forward with the survey to
determine whether or not a special tax is feasible. He agreed that the library
should not be convoluted by including it in the November election but he would
need more information about what and when the Council should hold an election
if feasible. At the same time the City should continue attempting to meet with
Supervisor Knabe to determine whether he would be able to give the City any
money toward a new library.
CM/Lowry explained staff's direction in bringing this matter to the Council, was to
secure a revenue stream for the library without having to rely on outside sources.
M/Chang agreed that the City should not use Economic Development monies to
pay for the consultant but that the City should continue to pursue the survey and
other means of financing including possible funding of the survey by Supervisor
Knabe and the Friends of the Library.
C/Herrera recommended putting this item on the May 3 City Council agenda to
allow staff an opportunity to talk with Supervisor Knabe about funding the survey
and other possible sources instead of using Economic Development funds to
move forward with the survey.
C/Zirbes agreed with C/Herrera. When he received the study session packet he
was surprised to see that consultants were on the agenda because he thought
that staff was going to pursue other avenues before bringing in other people.
Certainly if the City was left with no other options a survey should be conducted
before deciding whether to push for any kind of a tax on the ballot. He would
prefer to exhaust all other options before spending money on a survey.
CM/Lowry confirmed Council's direction to schedule a face-to-face meeting with
Supervisor Knabe to obtain funding to construct the library or obtain money for
the survey to obtain information about whether to pursue a parcel tax. If
Supervisor Knabe gave D.B. $8 million and the City used the $2.5 million
committed funds to build a library, where would the money come from to maintain
the library? Staff has to address that concern. One way to address the issue is to
discuss securing a revenue stream to maintain and operate the library. The
survey could be geared to suit either situation. Regardless of the outcome of the
meeting with Supervisor Knabe, there remain unanswered questions.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 6 CC STUDY SESSION
C/Herrera explained that if Supervisor Knabe gave D.B. $8 million to build a
library, it would be a regional library.
ACM/Doyle explained that the D.B. would not be large enough to support a
regional library.
C/Herrera said that in that case Supervisor Knabe would not give D.B. $8 million.
ACM/Doyle explained that Supervisor Knabe had indicated that he would not
give D.B. $8 million.
C/Herrera said that if D.B. was able to build a regional library it was likely that the
Rowland Heights Library would close and Supervisor Knabe would relocate
those dollars to the D.B. Library.
C/Chang felt that under the circumstances the best option would be to go for an
assessment and if the City wants to build a new library the survey and campaign
would be a necessary element. He agreed that the Council should talk with
Supervisor Knabe. However, he felt it was not feasible that the City would get the
money to build the library and the City would be wasting time if it did not move
forward to seek other alternatives.
C/Zirbes felt the consensus was to meet with Supervisor Knabe and to bring the
matter back for further consideration on May 3.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the City Council,
M/Chang adjourned the Study Session at 6:35 p.m.
Linda C. Lowry, City Clerk
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of ,, 2005.
WEN CHANG, Mayor
Agenda No. 6.1.2
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
APRIL 19, 2005
b*4?*440tr
STUDY SESSION: Mayor Chang called the City Council Study Session to
order at 5:30 p.m. in Room CC -8 of the SCAQMD/Government Center Building, 21825
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
► Discussion with Consultants regarding financing a new Diamond Bar Library.
► Discussion of Cable TV Franchise and local programming needs (Continued to May
3, 2005)
M/Chang adjourned the Study Session to the Regular Meeting at 6:35 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the Regular City Council meeting to
order at 6:50 p.m. in The Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 Copley Dr.,
Diamond Bar, CA.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Zirbes led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION: Pastor Darlene Jones, Diamond Canyon Christian
Church, gave the Invocation.
ROLL CALL: Council Members Herrera, Zirbes, Mayor Pro Tem
O'Connor and Mayor Chang.
Staff Present: Linda Lowry, City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City
Attorney; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; James DeStefano, Assistant City Manager;
David Liu, Director of Public Works; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Ryan McLean,
Senior Management Analyst and Sara West, Recreation Supervisor il.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Approved as presented.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
1.1 Mayor Chang read a Proclamation proclaiming April 25 to May 1, 2005 as
"West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week.
1.2 MPT/O'Connor read a Proclamation proclaiming April 2005 as "County of Los
Angeles Earthquake Preparedness Month."
NEW BUSINESS RECOGNITION:
1.3 C/Herrera presented Young Oh with a Certificate Plaque for Tofu Restaurant
as New Business of the Month for April 2005.
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None Offered.
APRIL 19, 2005
PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Matson said she was concerned about the
tone of the campaign for election of a City Council Member. She urged residents to
vote in this very important election.
Kathleen Newe, Friends of the Library, thanked the Council Members for taking time
to investigate possibilities for building a new library in D.B. She spoke about new
programs at the current library advertised on the new electronic sign that includes
an ethnic author series in conjunction with Irene Wang, Community Librarian, who
was recently named "Librarian of the Year' by the County of Los Angeles. On May
5, Cinco de Mayo, two Chicano authors will speak about their experiences. On May
25 Asian Americans will participate. She asked residents to please attend the free
series beginning at 6:30 p.m. at the D.B. Library. She invited everyone to attend the
May 1 Wine Soiree at the D.B. Center. Tickets can be purchased at local businesses
or from Rick Rogers 861-2002,
Marie Buckland said that sometime Saturday or Sunday night her candidate's signs
were removed and she reported the incident to the Sheriff.
Clyde Hennessee was pleased the City was holding a special election for City
Council Member. He felt the City could not afford to build a new library.
Steve Tye said that he, Jack Tanaka and Frank Farago are candidates for City
Council. He had occasion to speak with Jack Tanaka on Saturday and no mention
was made of any mudslinging or backbiting. He challenged the Council to end what
he called campaigning by issues" in front of the Council. If anyone has an issue with
his campaign they should call him to discuss the matter. Steve Tye thanked Deputy
Tom Lanning when during his lunch break last week he thwarted an attempted
robbery near Barro's Pizza. Last week Mr. Tye attended the League of California
Cities Planners Institute and one issue that was addressed was "traffic." He thanked
Council for approving expenditures for consultants who were directed by staff to
sponsor meetings that address traffic issues in the community and he urged
residents to attend the Neighborhood SMART Meetings addressing traffic issues in
their neighborhoods.
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
5. SCHEULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — April 26, 2005 — 7:00 p.m.,
Auditorium, AQMDIGovernment Center, 21865 Copley Dr.
5.2 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING — April 28, 2005 —
7:00 p.m., Hearing Board Room, AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley
Dr.
5.3 ARBOR DAY CELEBRATION — April 29, 2005 — 9:00 a.m., Pantera Park,
738 Pantera Dr.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL
5.4 PEPSI PITCH, HIT AND RUN — May 1, 2005 —2:00 p.m., D.B. Little League
Field, 22601 Sunset Crossing Rd.
5.5 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING — May 2, 2005 — 7:00 p.m.,
Diamond Bar/Walnut Sheriff Station, 21695 E. Valley Blvd., Walnut,
5.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — May 3, 2005 — 6:30 p.m., Auditorium,
AQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded to approve
the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Zirbes, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
6.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
6.1 .1 Study Session of April 5, 2005 — As Submitted.
6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 5, 2005 — As Submitted.
6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES —
Regular Meeting of March 22, 2005.
6.3 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER DATED APRIL 19, 2005 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $474,965.51.
6.4 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR AUDITING SERVICES FOR FY 2004-05
THROUGH FY 2006-07 WITH OPTION TO RENEW FOR AN ADDITIONAL
TWO YEARS,
6.5 AMENDED PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED
JANUARY 16, 1990 TO FACILITATE IN-HOUSE PROMOTIONS AND
REDUCE RECRUITMENT EXPENSE.
6.6 APPROVED APPROPRIATION OF $10,711 FOR FY 2004105 BUDGET FOR
UNANTICIPATED CLEANUP AND SLOPE DAMAGE DUE TO HEAVY
RAINSTORMS IN JANUARY 2005.
6.7 (a) AWARDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF
$184,924.50 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $18,492.50 FOR
FOR
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $203,417 TO 4 -CON ENGINEER,
CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 11 ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE
CANYON PARK, PLUS AN ALLOCATION OF $13,863 OF CDBG FUNDS
AND $116,322 OF PROP 40 FUNDS TO FULLY FUND THE PROJECT.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL
7.
(b) AUTHORIZED D&J MUNICIPAL SERVICES TO PERFORM
INSPECTION AND PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR THE SYCAMORE
CANYON PARK ADA PHASE 11 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE NOT -
TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $7,500.
6.8 APPROVED COMOND BAR MEMBERSHIP TO THE NATIONAL
PROPR ATED $2 864 FOR PAYMENT
LEAGUEOFCITIESAND AOF
DUES FOR ONE YEAR.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 5A(2005): PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05(2005)
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF.
ACM/DeStefano reported on staff's recommendation for Council to extend
an existing interim ordinance that resulted in a moratorium on prohibiting
establishment of medical Marijuana dispensaries in the City to permit staff
additional time to research the matter. Unless extended the interim ordinance
would expire at the end of the month. On April 5 in accordance with State law
staff provided Council with a report detailing actions that were performed to
date toward establishing new standards to regulate such businesses in the
City. Granting of the extension would result in termination of the moratorium
of March 2005 unless again extended by the City Council.
M/Chang opened the Public Hearing.
With no one present who wished to speak on this item, M/Chang closed the
Public Hearing.
C/Zirbes moved, C/Herrera seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 5A(2005)
extending Ordinance No. 05(2005) by ten and one-half months. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Zirbes, MPT/O'Connor,
M/Chang
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
8.1 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-60E: APPROVING CHANGES TO THE
FACILITIES USE POLICY FOR THE DIAMOND BAR CENTER TO
ESTABLISH A NEW VARIANCE THAT ALLOWS FREE USE OF THE
CENTER FOR GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT PROVIDE
BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY OR ARE CO-SPONSORED BY THE
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL
CITY; AND A LOTTERY SYSTEM FOR INSTANCES WHEREIN TWO OR
MORE PARTIES ARRIVE AT THE SAME TIME TO RESERVE THE SAME
DATE, TIME AND ROOM AT THE CENTER. (Continued from April 5, 2005)
RSII/West reported that staff had received several requests from
governmental organizations seeking free use of the Diamond Bar Center for
meetings that are open to the public. Having these meetings at the Diamond
Bar Center serves the public interest by having public presentations on
issues of local interest that are conveniently located for D.B. residents to
attend. The current Facilities Use Policy requires governmental
organizations, except the City of D.B., to pay a fee for use of the Diamond
Bar Center. Approval of a resolution would allow staff to waive fees if staff
determined that there is public benefit from use by a governmental
organization. She explained the Lottery System that would be used to
determine first right of use and asked that the City Council to adopt the
resolution as amended.
C/Herrera moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2003-
60E as amended.
C/Herrera asked for clarification of the "same time."
RSII/West said that in most cases the first person would have made a "soft
reservation" so that a person coming in at a later time would not be able to
make a reservation. In this case the policy refers to the first day of the month
when the month becomes available at the 12 or 15 month point and there is
usually more than one individual on-site with the same priority ranking at the
same time. This Resolution allows staff to implement a fair and balanced
lottery system that would treat all individuals the same who were present
when the doors opened at 7:30 a.m.
RSII/West responded to C/Herrera that the Facilities Use Policy was
available on the City's Website.
C/Herrera asked that an explanation of the lottery system also be scrolled on
the message board.
C/Herrera asked if Council of Governments, Metropolitan Transit Authority,
League of Cities and other such groups fell within the category of
governmental agencies.
CA/Jenkins asked if Council wanted those organizations included.
C/Herrera asked that the following groups be included: Council of
Governments, Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los Angeles County Sanitation
District and League of Cities.
APRIL 19, 2005 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL
C/Zirbes asked if these would be "no charge to the public" events because he
wanted to be certain that no revenue would be generated.
C/Herrera said that Mobility 21 charges a registration fee. In order for an
organization to qualify for exemption there would have to be enough lead
time for Council to adopt a resolution allowing them to use the facility at no
cost. She suggested that "when deemed appropriate" be added so that the
City Manager, upon concurrence of the City Council could waive the fees.
CA/Jenkins said that the resolution would only be required in the second
instance. For example, if staff determined that use by the governmental
organization would provide a substantial and measurable benefit to the D.B.
community, the fee would be waived and there would be no need for a
Council resolution. The only time Council would need a resolution was if the
finding could not be made and it was brought to Council for sanction.
CA/Jenkins suggested the following amendment In Line 3 add the following
after agencies: "....agencies, districts and authorities." And, after Federal add
the following: ,multi -city organizations and joint powers authorities to which
the City belongs."
C/Herrera concurred and said she would prefer to leave it open ended in
case an agency was inadvertently left off of the list.
C/Herrera moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2003-
60E as amended. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Zirbes, MPT/O'Connor,
M/Chang
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT. COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
RECESS: M/Chang recessed the City Council Meeting to the Redevelopment Agency's
Annual Meeting at 7:45 p.m.
RECONVENE: MlChang reconvened the City Council Meeting at 7:49 p.m.
9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
C/Zirbes thanked staff for a wonderful 16th Annual City Birthday Celebration. During
the past two weeks, he attended many events. He apologized to the Volunteer
Patrol for not being able to attend their dinner last week. He said that he and other
Council Members work on community issues on a daily basis and he encouraged
residents to contact their Councilperson with any concerns or suggestions.
C/Herrera echoed C/Zirbes' thanks to staff and special thanks to Bob Rose, Sara
West, Christy Murphey and Ryan Wright who along with other staff members
worked very hard to make the 16th Annual City Birthday Celebration a successful
and enjoyable event. She hoped the residents enjoyed the party. She said she was
APRIL 19, 2005
PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL
pleased and happy that the world had a new Pope, Pope Benedict XVI and that this
was an important event for her religion. She wished the Pope long life and excellent
health.
MPT/O'Connor also thanked staff for the wonderful 16th City Birthday Party. This
event allows the community to come together to let the community see what groups
and individuals participate in the daily betterment of D.B. Special kudos to staff and
Sara West for taking charge of the event. Every year it seems to get better and
better. She felt that each of the three candidates for the vacant City Council position
was well qualified and the community should feel proud that the applicants stepped
forward to run for office. She agreed that mudslinging was uncalled for because
each candidate had his own qualities and it was up to the voters to find out about
each candidate and vote accordingly.
Sy weelt that any one of the three candidates
would serve the Council a comm
M/Chang echoed his colleagues in praising staff for their excellent work on a very
successful 16th City Birthday Celebration. Staff did a wonderful job planning and
executing this event as they have done with many other events. Recently, he and
C/Zirbes attended the Youth Athletic Competition at much. High
School and the
kids and parents seemed to enjoy the program very again commended
staff for their efforts in promoting such a wonderfully successful event. He and
C/Zirbes met on April 14 to discuss possibilities for economic development in the
community. He thanked C/Zirbes and the consultant for their intelligent input. He
cautioned everyone that with summer approaching residents should take every
precaution to avoid the West Nilevirus.
sties, but that membid he was very eeased rship ship wastals�o
colleagues voted to loin the NationLeague of C
appropriate in the past.
10. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the
meeting at 8:00 P.M.
LINDA C. LOWRY, CITY CLERK
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of
12005.
WEN CHANG, MAYOR
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Agenda No.
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF
MARCH 10, 2005
CALL TO ORDER:
6.2
Chair Pincher called the meeting to order at 7:05
p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management/Government Center Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond
Bar, California 91765,
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chair Pincher led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chair Pincher, Vice Chairman Torng and Commissioners Morris, Shah and
Virginkar.
Kimberly Molina, Assistant Engineer; Sharon Gomez, Senior ManageAlso Present: David Liu, Director of Public Works; Fred Alamolhoda, Senior Engineer;
Debbie Gonzales, Administrative Assistant. ment Analyst and
1• REORGANIZATION OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION:
Chair/Pincher opened the nominations for Chair of the Traffic and Transportation
Commission.
Commissioner Morris nominated Commissioner Pincher to serve a second term as
Chair and Commissioner Torng to serve a second term as Vice Chair.
There were no other nominations offered.
Roll Call was taken as follows:
Commissioner Morris — YES
Commissioner Shah — YES
Commissioner Virginkar — YES
Commissioner Torng — NO
Commissioner Pincher— YES
C/Morris said there was precedence for serving two consecutive terms on the
Commission and felt the nominations were in order.
MARCH 10, 2005 PAGE 2
T&T COMMISSION
Il. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A• Minutes of regular meeting of February 10, 2005.
CNirginkar moved, VC/Torng seconded, to approve the February 10, 2005
minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
Morris, Virginkar, VC/Torng,
NOES:COMMISSIONERS:
None/Pincher
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS:
Shah
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
None
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: None
V. ITEMS FROM STAFF:
A. Traffic Enforcement Update — Received and filed on the following items:
1. Citations: February 2005
2. Collisions: February 2005
1 Future Deployment of the Radar Trailer
VI. OLD BUSINESS: None
VII. NEW BUSINESS: None
VIII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS: None
IX. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: None Offered.
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
A. Caltrans 57/60 Freeway Construction Project.
SE/Alamolhoda reported that the project was on schedule. He said he
spoke with Caltrans engineers this morning and they reported no major
changes or delays in the project and no major damage as a result of the
excessive rain. Staff and Caltrans engineers will meet next Monday to
discuss further project details.
B. Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP)
SMA/Gomez reported that the first meeting was held on February 17, 2Q05
in the most southerly district south of Pathfinder Road. The summary
MARCH 10, 2005 PAGE 3
T&T COMMISSION
contained in the packet lists residents' concerns and requests: The second
meeting held February 22, 2005 was a follow-up meeting for the most
northerly district on the east side of SR -57 and north of the SR -60 freeway.
Eight residents attended and provided their comments. The third meeting
was held February 24, 2005 for the westerly side of the SR -57 freeway,
north of Golden Springs Drive. Seven residents attended. The consultant
showed digital photos of the area with overlays depicting the possible
mitigating devices. For subsequent meetings the consultant is preparing a
draft proposed modifications to the streets and will show the exact street
locations for placement of the devices. Accompanying the draft will be a
letter from the City that explains the program and the concept to the
residents as well as a survey card asking for residents. Results of the
survey will be presented to the commission at a future date.
SMA/Gomez stated that the City had scheduled introductory meetings for
the three remaining districts. The first meeting is scheduled for Tuesday,
March 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m, in Room CC -3 of the SCAQMD for the area
immediately adjacent to the Diamond Bar Center bounded by Grand
Avenue on the south, Golden Springs Drive on the west, SR -60 on the north
and the entire boundary of the City limits on the east. The second meeting
is slated for Thursday, March 24, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Pine Room at the
Diamond Bar Center for the area bounded by Grand Avenue on the north,
Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive on the west, Pathfinder Road on
the south and Diamond Bar Center for the area immediately adjacent to the
Diamond Bar Center bounded by Grand Avenue on the south, Golden
Springs Drive on the west, SR -60 on the north and the entire boundary of
the City limits on the east. The third meeting is scheduled for Tuesday,
April 12, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the multi-purpose room at Walnut Elementary
School for the area surrounding the school bounded by the railroad tracks to
the north, Pathfinder Road to the south and Brea Canyon Road to the east.
Chair/Pincher wondered if the survey card would be an adequate response
from residents who had not been present for the neighborhood meetings
and consultant's presentations. She wished that more 'residents would
participate in the meetings. SMA/Gomez further explained that the
conceptual plan pertaining to each district would accompany the cover letter
and survey card that would be mailed only to the respective affected
residents.
XI. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY EVENTS — as adgendized.
MARCH 10, 2005 PAGE 4 T&T COMMISSION
XII. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
PWD/Liu stated that ACE informed the City they would conduct a public outreach
meeting on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 commencing at 6:00 p.m. and ending at
7:30 p.m. in the multi-purpose room at Walnut Elementary School.
SE/Alamolhoda reported that the Grand Avenue Beautification Project had become
three separate projects. Phase I is from the SR -57160 freeways to 1600 .East
Golden Springs and is a $1.5 million dollar project currently advertised with bids to
open on March 24, 2005 and Council award of contract on April 5, 2005. The
project consists of reconstructing and enhancing Grand Avenue within those limits
and modifying the signals on Golden Springs Drive and Grand Avenue as well as
Grand Avenue including the signal at the ingress/egress of the condominiums. An
additional signal will be added on Golden Springs Drive for the new entrance to
Target. Other improvements include median improvements, improvement of the
irrigation and landscaping system, intersection treatments (decorative items),
traffic enhancements and street widening with the addition of a lane on Grand
Avenue with new turnouts to Target and the residences. Construction is slated to
commence in April and is expected to conclude in 90 days. Phase II is currently
under design and includes the area from 1600 East Golden Springs Drive on
Grand Avenue to Rolling Knoll Road. Phase III encompasses the remaining area
from Rolling Knoll Road to the easterly City limits.
SE/Alamolhoda responded to C/Virginkar that Phases II and III is expected to cost
close to $3 million dollars for a total project cost of about $5 million dollars.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the Traffic and
Transportation Commission, Chair/Pincher adjourned the meeting at 7:32 p.m,
Respectfully,
David G. Liu, Secretary
Attest:
Chair Liana Pincher
CITY COUNCIL l�
'v fj i
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of e City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage ,{,�,.U�
TITLE: Ratification of Check Register dated Aril 28, 2005.
Agenda # 6.-3
Meeting Date: May 3, 2
AGENDA REPORT
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify Check Register dated April 28, 2005 in the amount of $938,383.31.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Expenditure of $938,383.31 in City funds.
BACKGROUND:
The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly
basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION:
The attached list of accounts payable bills, in the form of a check register dated April 28,
2005 for $938,383.31, is being presented to the City Council for ratification. All
payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and
the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deem
accurate by the Finance Director.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
Finance Director
REVIEWED BY:
Department Head
— VNI
Assi Ci y. anager
Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register — 04/28/05
I ~ I A
CITY OF DIAMOND
AFFIDAVIT
AR
CHECK REG
The attached listing of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register
and is afoed is accurate. Payments have
dated April 28, 2005 has been audited
been allowed from the following funds in these
Amount
Description
General Fund
Prop A - Transit Fund
integrated Waste Mgt Fund
Air Qlty Impr FD (AB2766)
Com Dev Blk Grant Fund
Citizens Option for Public Safety Fd
LLAD #38 Fund
LLAD #39 Fund
LLAD #41 Fund
Capital Improvement Project Fund
Total for All Funds
Signed:
Linda G. Magnuson
Finance Director
$737,455.96
80, 815.28
5,657.19
912.75
19,975.00
459.27
32,805.00
37,249.20
16,106.44
6,947.22
$938,383.31
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 1
DUE THRU! 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
PREPAID
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
IST PMF BANCORP
0014030-44000--
4/08/05 TEMP SVCS -WK 4/2
1,201.49 04/21/2005
64417
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,201.49
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUB VENDOR
1,201.49
ELLE ABINADER
001 -23012 --
REFUND -EN 01-307
946.24 04/28/2005
65035
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
946.24
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
946.24
ADELPHIA
0014010-42130-CC505-42130
0015340-42126--
MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL
46.95 04/28/2005
65035
0014010-42130-CC465-42130
INTERNET SVCS -HERITAGE
39.95 04/28/2005
65036
MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL
46.95 04/28/20Q5
65036
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
133.85
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
133.85
AJAX SIGN GRAPHICS INC
001409C-41200,-
25911 NAME PLATE-MEYER
13.59 04/21/2005
64918
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
13.59
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
13.59
ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION
0015350 -42353 --
REIMS -CITY B/DAY PARTY
93.00 04/28/2005
65037
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
93.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
93.00
AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION
0015340-42130--
I-86129 EQ RENTAL-LORBEER SCHL
69.24 04/28/2005
65038
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
69.24
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
69.24
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
0015510-42315--
4/11/05 MEMBERSHIP DUES-ALAMOLHOD
152.50 04/28/2005
65039
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
152.50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
132.50
AMERICANA ART CHINA CO
0014090-41400--
44718/45011 SUPPLIES -CITY MUGS
0014090-41400--
20.64 04/21/2005
64919
44718/45011 SUPPLIES -CITY MUGS
148.79 04/21/2005
64919
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
169.43
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
169.43
f �
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
PAGE: 3
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
JOSIE BAUTISTA
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
001-34780--
19449 RECREATION REFUND
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
5
0.00 04/28/2005 65043
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(,,)
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
50.00
BENESYST
001 -21105 --
PP 08/05 4/22/05 -PAYROLL DEDUCTION
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
384.62 09/2I/2005 64925
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
389.62
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
BRIAN HUGHES CONSTRUCTION
384.62
1255215-44000-60050304-44000
16282 4/6/05 HIP PROG-21241 BNTN SPRNG
TOTAL PREPAIb CHECK (S)
13,500.00 04/28/2005 65044
TOTAL. UNPAID CHECK(S)
13,500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
13,500.00
MAUREEN BURNBTT
001-34780--
19373 RECREATION REFUND
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK{S}
65.00 04/28/2005 65045
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S.)
65.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
65.00
BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYS INC
0015333-46250--
56093 MISC EQ -DBC
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
155.94 09/28/2005 65046
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
155.94
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
155.94
CALIFORNIA JPIA
0015210-42340--
2281 TRNG-N FONG 4/18-4/20
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
675.00 04/21/2005 64926
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
675.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
675.40
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL-AGE CONSORTIUM
0015350-42340--
CALSACTRNG-C/SVCS STAFF
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
80.00 04/21/2005 64927
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
80.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
CALIFORNIA SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS INC
80.00
0015333-96250--
16219 1263 INST-ADNL SEC CAMERA DBC
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
980.00 04/28/2005 65097
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
980..00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
CALVARY CHAPEL/POMONA VALLEY
980.00
001-23002--
19146 PK REFUND -PETERSON 17106
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(,,)
50.00 04/21/2005 64928
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
-00
50.00
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 4
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
PREPAID
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE CHECK
EVERETT CARDINAS
001-23002--
19152 PK REFUND -$YC CYN
1605.1 50.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64929
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
50.00
CATALINA BALLAST BULB COMPANY
0015333-41200--
56496 SUPPLIES -DBC
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
54.13 04/28/2005 65048
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK($)
54.13
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
OQ
54.13
CATALINA EXPRESS CORP
0015350-42410--
820222 ESCURSION-DAY CAMP
8/3 150.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64930
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
150.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
150.00
KRISTINE CHANG
001-34760-
19292 RECREATION REFUND
155.00 04/28/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
65049
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
155.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
155.00
LING -LING CHANG
0015350-44100--
P & R COMM -4/13
45.00 04/28/2005 65050
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
45.09
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
45.00
CHARLIES SANDWICH SHOPPE
0015510-42325--
2182 MTG SUPPLIES-P/WORKS
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(5)
31.22 04/28/2005 65051
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
31.22
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
31.22
CHERI CHEN
001-39780--
19365 RECREATION REFUND
129.00 09/28/2005. 65052
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
129.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
129.00
CHINO MOWER & ENGINE SERVICE
0015310-42210--
0015310-42210--
113528 MAINT-pARKS
260.00 04/21/2005 64931
0012944 MAINT-PARKS
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
71.52 04/21/2005 64931
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
331.52
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
331.52
CHERRY CHIU
001-34780--
19129 RECREATION REFUND
85-00 04/21/2005 64932
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
85,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
85.00
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 5
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
PREPAID
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT BATE
CHECK
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
001.4090-42330--
MTG-GONZALVES LEGISLATIVE
437.30 04/21/2005 69933
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
437.30
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
437.30
COMMERCIAL, SECURITY GROUP
0015310-41200--
307752 SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015310-41200--
142.40 04/21/2005 64934
307755 SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015333-92210--
55.79 04/21/2005 64934
310888 SUPPLIES -DBC
157.01 04/21/2005 64934
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
355.20
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
355.20
CORPORATE BUSINESS INTERIORS INC
0015350-41200--
17175 SUPPLIES -DBC
234.36 04/28/2005 65053
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
234.36
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
234.36
D & J MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC
2505310-46415-15700-46415
16111
4/12/05
PLAN CHECK SVCS-SYC CYN
1,500.00 04/26/2005 65054
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
11500.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
1,500.00
D H MAINTENANCE SERVICES
0015333-45300--
A15809
7467
0015333-45300--
AD➢L MAINT-pBG
2,498.00 09/21/2005 69935
0015340-45300--
A15809
7381 MAINT-DBC MAR DS
12,006.50 04 /21/2005 64935
A15809
7381 MAINT-DHC
925.00 04/21/2005 64935
TOTAL PREPAID CF{ECK(S)
15,429.56
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
15,429.50
DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC
0015340-42210--
20994 SUPPLIES -PARKS
185.88 04/28/2005 65055
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
185.88
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
185.88
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC
2505310-46415-10005-46415
16044
166563
2505510-46416-10005-46416
16044
PROS MGT SVCS -FEB OS
1.,826.07 04/28/2005 65056
166563 PROJ MGT SVCS -FEB OS
1,826.07 04/26/2005 65056
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
3,652.14
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
3,652.14
ODILE DAWUD
001-34780--
19366 RECREATION REFUND
36.00 04/28/2005 65057
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
36.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
36.00
RUN BATE: 04/20/2005 14:56;32
BAR HAND CAR WASH
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
001535Q-45300--
15846 516714 EMPLOYEES BACKGROUND CHCK
0025554-42200--
CHECK REGISTER
0014060-42345--
15846
160.0.0
04/21/2005
64939
PAGE:
6
160.00
04/21/2005
64939
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
15642
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCTPREPAID
PO #
04/28/2005
320.00
0015230-42200--
15642
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
65060
.00
CAR WASH-NGHBRHD IMP
22.97
DATE
CHECK
DAY & NITE COPY CENTER
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
3.20.00
0015350-42353--
DIAMOND BAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
63.92
0015350-92110--
0014010-42325-CC405-42325
13053 PRINT SVCS -CITY B/OAY
53.85 04/28/2005
65058
0015350-42110--
0014010-42325-CC205-42325
13049 PRINT SVCS -RECREATION
61.70 04/21/2005
64936
0015510-42110--
16285
12455 PRINT SVCS -RECREATION
616.16
04/28/2005
65058
OOI5350-42110--
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
13046 PRINT SVCS -PUBLIC WORKS
152.69
04/21/2005
64936
1155517-42110--
120.00
12863 PRINT SVCS -RECREATION
18.94
04/21/2005
64936
OOI5350-42110--
16286
13275 EVERNT FLYERS -E -WASTE
1,867.31
04/28/2005
65058
450.00
04/28/2005
12897 PRINT SVCS -RECREATION
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
8.12
04/21/2005
64936
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
2,778.77
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
.00
450.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,770.77
MANUELA DEL ROSARIO
001-34730--
16383 RECREATION REFUND
66.00
04/21/2005
64937
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
66.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
66.00
CAROL DENNIS
0015.350-44000--
A15695
P&R041305 PROF.SVCS-P&R COMM
0014030-94000--
A13695
175.00
04/28/2005
65059
0014030-44000--
DBCC041905 PROF.SVCS-CC/SS MTG
225.00
04/28/2005
65059
0019030-94000--
A15695
DBCC040505 PROF.SVCS-CNCL MTG 4/5
250.00
04/21/2005
A15695
LTF040405 PROF.SVCS-D/B LIBRARY
64938
200.00
04/21/2005
64938
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
850.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
850.00
DEPARTMENT OE JUSTICE
BAR HAND CAR WASH
001535Q-45300--
15846 516714 EMPLOYEES BACKGROUND CHCK
0025554-42200--
0014060-42345--
15846
160.0.0
04/21/2005
64939
516714 EMPLOYEES BACKGROUND CHCK
160.00
04/21/2005
64939
65060
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
15642
CAR WASH -COMM SVCS
21.97
04/28/2005
320.00
0015230-42200--
15642
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
7.99
04/28/2005
65060
.00
CAR WASH-NGHBRHD IMP
22.97
04/28/2005
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
3.20.00
DIAMOND BAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
63.92
0014010-42325-CC405-42325
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
0014010-42325-CC205-42325
MTG-COUNCIL 6/6
75.00
04/21/2005
64940
MTG-COUNCIL
45.00
04/21/2005
64941
DIAMOND
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
120.00
15694
5752
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
_00
120.00
450.00
04/28/2005
DIAMOND
BAR HAND CAR WASH
0025554-42200--
OD15350-42200--
15642
CAR WASH-P/WORKS
10-99
04/28/2005
65060
0014090-42200--
15642
CAR WASH -COMM SVCS
21.97
04/28/2005
65060
0015230-42200--
15642
CAR WASH -POOL VEH
7.99
04/28/2005
65060
15642
CAR WASH-NGHBRHD IMP
22.97
04/28/2005
65060
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
63.92
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.DO
63.92
DIAMOND
BAR IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION
0014095-42115--
15694
5752
AD -MAR OS
450.00
04/28/2005
65061
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
450.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(,,)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
450.00
' L �
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 7
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO 4
INVOICEPREPAID
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE CHECK
DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONAL DELI
0015350-41200--
MTG SUPPLIES -P & R COMM
83.00 04/21/2005 64942
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
$3.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
83.00
DIAMOND BAR MOBIL
0015350-42200--
19417 VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS
176.27 04/28/2005 65062
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
176.27
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
176.27
DIAMOND BAR/WALNUT YMCA
1255215-42355-D9690104-42355
A15629
MAR 05
CDEG PROG-CHILDCARE MAR
2,640.00 04/21/2005 69993
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
2,640.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
2,640.00
DIANA CHO & ASSOCIATES
1255215-44000-D9690604-44000
15690
FEB/MAR
CONSULTANT SVCS-FEB/MAR
3,045.00 04/28/2005 65063
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
3,045.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
3,045.00
DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INC
1125553-45529--
1125553-45529--
15815
3/16-.3/31 DIAMOND RIDE -3/16-3/31
13,243.01 04/21/2005 69944
15815
3/01-3/15 DIAMOND RIDE -3/01-3/15
10,858.54 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64944
24,101.55
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
24,101.55
DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES
001-23004--
`AN-MA.R 05 SPCL EVENT INS -JAN -MAR 05
4,163.63 04/28/2005 65064
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
4,163.63
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
4,163.63
EDUCATION TO GO
0015350-45300--
15708
849112 CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
78.00 04/21/2005 69945
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(.S)
78.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
78.00
EPC FUND
1264411-42390--
EMER PREP TRNG-S CLARKE
20.00 04/21/2005 64946
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
20.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
20.00
EXPRESS TEL
0014090-42125--
1578255 LONG DIST SVCS -MAR OS
77.21 04/21/2005 64997
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
77.21
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
77.21
e +
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND $AR
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 8
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROTECT-ACCT
POP
PREPAID
REPAID
DESCRIPTION
'4MOWT DATE CHECK
FEDERAL EXPRESS
0014090-42120--
547512405 EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL
122.52 09/21/2005 64948
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
122.52
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
122,52
CINDY FOISY
001 -32230 --
DB 434D2 REFUND -PARKING CITATION
30.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
64949
30..00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
30.00
FOOD PROM THE HEART CATERING
0015350-41200--
16207
4/14/2005 SENIOR TEA -DBC 4/14
1,836.00 04/28/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
65065
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
1,836.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
1,836.00
FOOTHILL TRANSIT
1125553-45533--
1125553-45535--
15724
15607 CITY SUBSIDY -APR OS
1,518.50 04/21/2005 69950
15724
15607 FOOTHILL PASSES -APR 05
6,290.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64950
7,808.50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
7,808.50
NATALIE FRANCO
001-23002--
19145 PK REFUND -PETERSON 17440
50.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64951
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL, DUE VENDOR
.00
50.00
FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC
0015333-42210--
283428 SUPPLIES -DBC
116.21 04/21/2005 64952
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
116.21
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
116.21
KIM GARCIA
001-23002--
19148 PK REFUND-REAGAN 17701
50.00 04/21/2005 64953
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
50.00
BARBARA GASPARIAN
001-23002--
19147 PK REFUND-REAGAN 17085
50.00 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
64954
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
50.00
LAURA GASPARRELLI
001-34780--
19372 RECREATION REFUND
85.00 04/28/2005 65066
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2065 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 9
DUE THRU: 04/2$/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
PO jj INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
MYUNG GO
001 -34430 --
REFUND -TEMP SIGN
100.00 04/21/2005
64955
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
100.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
100.00
GOVPARTNER
1185098-44030--
15831 994 REQUEST PARTNER SVCS -APR
850.00 04/21/2005
64956
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
850.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
850.00
GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS
0015230-45520--
15602 DB3/05 GRAFFITI CONTROL SVCS -MAR
4,070-00 04/28/2005
65067
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
4,070.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
4,070.00
GRAND MOBIL
0015510-42200--
28351 VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS
153..67 04/28/2005
65068
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
153.67
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
153.67
GRAYBAR
0015333-42210--
908208883 SUPPLIES -DBC
108.72 04/21/2005
64957
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
108.72
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
108,72
LAURIE GRUENWALD
001-23002--
19337 PK REFUND -PETERSON 17544
50.00 04/28/2005
65069
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
DAVID J GRUNDY
0015350-44100--
P & R COMM -4/13
45.00 04/28/2005
65070
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
45.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
45.00
x
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE:
10
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
PREPAID
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE
CHECK
HALL & FOREMAN,INC
001-23012--
15-03-082
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-459
93-75
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-077
ADMIM FEE -EN 04-466
187.50
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-071
ADMIN FEE -EN 05-475
-152-35
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-071
ADMIN FEE -EN 05-475
152.35
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-103
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-434
-112.50
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-078
ADMIN FEE -EN 05-472
-754.38
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-077
ADMIM FEE -EN 04-466
-187,50
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-076
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-469
-187.50
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-068
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-434
75.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-081
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-448
206.25
04/.28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-068
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-434
-75.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-078
ADMIN FEE -EN 05-472
754.38
04/26/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-076
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-469
187.50
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-103
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-434
112.50
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-081
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-448
93-75
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
15-03-069
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-459
93.75
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-069
ADMTN FEE -EN 04-459
-93.75
04/28/2005
65074
001-.34650--
15-03-082
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-459
-93.75
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-081
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-448
-93-75
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
A16099
15-03-068
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
248.14
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
16158
15-03-081
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
249.18
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16159
15-03-081
PROF -SVCS -EN -04-448
825.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16279
15-03-077
PROF -SVCS -EN -04-466
750.00
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
16132
15-03-76
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
230.55
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16159
15-03-081
PROF.SVCS-EN-C4-448
375.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16069
15-03-082
PROF.SVCS-EN-04-459
375.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16098
15-03-068
PROF -SVCS -EN -04-434
300-00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16229
15-03-071
PROF,SVCS-EN-05-475
609.38
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16226
15-03-078
PROF -SVCS -EN -05-472
3,017.50
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
16158
15-03-081
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
320-38
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-4S223--
16160
15-03-077
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
301.71
04/28/2005
65074
001-23912--
16133
15-03-076
PROF.SVCS-EN-04-469
750.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16069
15-03-069
PROF.SVCS-EN-04-459
375.00
04/28/2005
65074
001-23012--
16098
15-03-103
PROF,SVCS-EN-04-434
450.00
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
A16099
15-03-103
PROF -SVCS -PLAN CHECK
372.00
04/28/2005
65074
0015551-45223--
A16039
15-03-070
PROF,SVCS-PLAN CHECK
258.75
04/28/2005
65074
001-34650--
15-03-081
ADMIN FEE -EN 04-440
-206.25
04/28/2005
65074
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
9,807.59
TOTAL UNPAID
CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
9,807.59
JESSICA HALL
0015350-45300--
CONTRACT SVCS -WINTER
120.00 04/21/2005
64958
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
120.00
TOTAL UNPAID
CHECK(5)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
120.00
RICK HESS
001-34780--
19130
RECREATION REFUND
65.00 04/21/2005.
64959
TOTAL PREPAID
CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID
CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
CITY OF DIAMOND PAR
RUN. DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 11
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
GWEN HILL
001-23002--
19150 PK REFUND-REAGAN 18603
50.00 04/21/2005
64960
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES INC
2505310-R46415-15700-46415
13000
0001 RE#13 ADA RETRO FIT-SYC CYN PK
114.89 04/28/2005
65075
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
114.89
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
114.89
HITT MARKING DEVICES,INC
0014090-42200--
245604 MAINT-F/COUNTER SIGNS
77.40 04/28/2005
65076
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
77.40
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
77.40
HOLLYWOOD BOWL
0015350-45310--
16206
25-29047 ADULT EXCRSN-HOLLYWD BOWL
814.00 04/28/2005
65077
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
814.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
814.00
GRACE HU
001-34760--
19276 RECREATION REFUND
183,00 04/28/2005
65078
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
183.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
183.00
HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
1155517-44000--
16264
2753 CONSULTNT SVCS -GRANT PROG
492.50 04/28/2005
65079
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
492.50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
492.50
INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE
0014095-42115--
15600
61795 AD -DHC
APR 05
895.00 04/20/2005
65080
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
895.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
895.00
INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA
0014431-45403--
15536
MAY 05 ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -MAY
6,241.50 04/21/2005
64961
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
6,241.50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
6,241.50
JAMES. EVENT PRODUCTIONS
0015350-42353--
08627 -DS CARNIVAL RIDES -CITY B/DAY
12,400.00 04/28/2005 65081
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
12,400-00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
12,400.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 12
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO # INVOICE
PREPAID
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
JOBS AVAILABLE
0014060-42115--
509038 AD -PUBLIC INFO COORDINATR
138.00 04/21/2005
64962
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
138.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
138.00
KENS HARDWARE
0015350-42200--
SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS
59.07 04/21/2005
64963
0015333-41200--
15826 SUPPLIES -DBC
0015340-42210--
224.31 04/21/2005
64963
15641 SUPPLIES -PARKS
231.94 04/21/2005
64963
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
515.32
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
515.32
HEEBOK KIM
DO1-34780--
19454 RECREATION REFUND
30.00 04/28/2005
65082
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
30.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
30.00
KIRK STEINKE ELECTRIC
0015340-42210--
5188 MAINT-HERITAGE C/CTR
415.00 04/28/2005
65083
0014090-42210--
5190 MAINT-CITY HALL
160.00 04/2B/2005
65083
0015333-42210--
5189 MAINT-DBC
225.00 04/28/2005
65083
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
800.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
800-00
MELODY KOJIRA
001-34780--
19321 RECREATION REFUND
85-00 04/28/2005
65084
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
JUDI KRETSCHMER
001-23002--
19141 PK REFUND-PANTERA 18634
50.00 04/21/2005
64964
TOTAL PREPAID CHFCK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
LA COUNTY REGISTRAR -RECORDER
0014030-42390--
ACCESS CRDS-CRBBNS/DELAMS
150.00 04/28/2005
65085
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
150-00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
150.00
LANDAMERICA GATEWAY TITLE CO
0015210-44000--
6904151/1 TITLE SEARCH -23885 MNNQUA
75.00 04/21/2005
64965
0015210-44000--
6904150/1 TITLE SEARCH -23840 S/XNG
75.00 04/21/2005
64965
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
150.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
150.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 13
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE
PREPAID
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
LANDS' END
0014095-41400--
15619
3968284 SUPPLIES -STAFF SHIRTS
234,67 04/28/2005
65086
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
234.67
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
234.67
LANTERMAN DEV CENTER/COMM INDUSTRIE
0015558-45503--
15640
328 PARKWAY MAINT-MAR O5
1,829.36 04/28/2005
65087
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,829.36
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,829.36
LEE KOSMONT ADVISORY SERVICES INC
0015240-R44000--
13411
6 PROF.SVCS-ECON DEV
2,538.91 04/28/2005
65088
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(5)
2,538.91
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,538.91
VICKY LEE
001-34780--
19275 RECREATION REFUND
85.00 04/28/2005
65089
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, INC
001-34650--
LSC12205 ADMIN FEE -EN 04-422
-28.80 04/28/2005
65090
001-23012--
LSC12205 ADMIN FEE -EN 04-422
28.80 04/28/2005
65090
001-23012--
16121
;SC12205 PROP -SVCS -EN -04-422
160.00 04/28/2005
65090
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
160.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.OD
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
160.00
LETTER PERFECT SIGNS INCORP
2505310-46415-19103-46415
7045 SIGNS-STARSHINE PK
105.55 04/28/2005
65091
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
105.55
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
105.55
HENNY LIANG
0015350-44100--
P & R COMM -4/i3
45.00 04/28/2005
65092
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
45.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
45.00
LIEBERT CASSIDY W14ITMORE
0014060-44021.--
15839
54372 LEGAL SVCS -PERSONNEL
100.00 04/21/2005
64965
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
100-00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
100.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 14
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
LIEHERT CORP
0014070-46230--
16189
GI337457 AC SYSTEM -SERVER ROOM
9,370.00 09/28/2005
65093
0014070-46230--
16189
CI1652026 AC SYSTEM -SERVER ROOM
5,913.79 04/28/2005
65093
TOTAL PREPAID CHBCK(S)
I0,283-79
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
10,283.79
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DIST. ATTORNEY
001-21114--
PP 07-08 SLRY ATTCHMT-BY0426064
258.$5 04/21/2005.
64968
001-21114--
PP 07-08 SLRY ATTCHMT-13D0001469
147.30 04/21/2005
64967
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
406.15
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(5)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
406.15
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
0015340-45300--
AR304771 SUMP PUMP SVCS-SYC CYN PK
59.38 04/28/2005
65094
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
59.38
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
59.38
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT
0014411-45402--
75156 CALVARY CHAPEL -MAR 03
5,956.75 04/2.8/2005
65095
0014411-45401--
75227 HELICOPTER SVCS -JAN -MAR
457.92 04/28/2.005
65095
0014411-45402--
74660 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTOR -MAR 05
5,929.63 04/21/2005
64969
1125553-45402--
75051 TRANSIT TCKT SALES -MAR 05
113.23 04/21/2005
64969
0014411-45401--
74972 CONTRACT SVCS -MAR 05
329,52.8.53 04/21/2005
64969
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
341,966.06
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
341,986.06
RUTH M LOW
0015210-44100--
PING COMM -3/8,3/22
130.00 04/21/2005
64970
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
130.0.0
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
130.00
LOWE'S
0014090-42200--
0015350-41200--
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
24.20 04/21/2005
64971
SUPPLIES -PARKS
12.98 04/21/2005
64971
0015333-42210--
15654
0015340-42210--
SUPPLIES-D13C
211.30 04/21/2005
64971
0015340-42210--
15654
SUPPLIES -PARKS
24.40 04/21/2005
64971
15654
SUPPLIES -PARKS
11.84 04/21/2005
69971
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
284.72
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
284.72
LUITEN'S WELDING
0015340-4221D--
26619 MAINT-LORBEER SCHOOL
140.00 04/28/2005 65096
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
140.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
140.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 15
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
PO #
PREPAID
INVOT CE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
NANCY LYONS
0015350-44100--
P & R COMM -4/13
45.00 04/28/2005 65097
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
45.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
45.00
M S A
0015510-42315--
MEMBERSHIP DUES-GARCIA
55.00 04/28/2005 65098
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
55.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VR'NDOR
55.00
MAGIC CARPET INC
0015340-42210--
8064 MATNT-HERITAGE PK
29.48 04/28/2005
65099
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
29.48
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
29.48
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
001-21115--
RI 34967 MAY 05 -EAP PREMIUMS
128.64 04/28/2005
6.5100
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
128.64
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
128.64
JENNIFER MATA
001-23002--
19151 PK REFUND-REAGAN 17217
50.00 04/21/2005
64972
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
MCE CORPORATION
0015558-45508--
15828
0503066 VEG CONTROL MAINT-MAR 05
7.,746.55 04/28/2005
65101
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
7,746.55
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
7,746.55
CRISTINA MCLOON
001-34780--
19294 RECREATION REFUND
85.00 04/29/2005
65102
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00 -
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
JOE MCMANUS
0015220-44100--
PLNG COMM -3/8,3/22
130.00 04/21/2005
64973
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
13.0.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
130.00
MDG ASSOCIATES INC
1255215-44000-60050304-44000
16238
3588 HIP LOAN DOC -21355 H/PINE
30.00 04/21/2005
64974
1255215-44000-60050304-44000
16238
3588 HIP LOAN DOC -2989 CRKD OR
1255215-44000-60050304-44000
16238
3588
30.00 04/21/2905
64974
HIP LOAN DOC -21242 FNTAIN
232.00 04/21/2005
64974
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
292.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
292.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 16
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
JENNIFER MENDOZA
001-23002--
19143 PK REFUND-PANTERA 18285
50.00 04/21/2005
64975
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
METROLINK
1125553-45533--
15725
131558 CITY SUBSIDY -APR D5
10,062.20 04/21/2005
64976
1125553-45535--
15725
131556 METROLINK PASSES -APR 05
1125553-45535--
39,654.80 04/21/2005
64976
15725
131558 PASSES RETURNED -APR 05
-2,746.00 04/21/2005
64976
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
46,971.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECC(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
46,971.00
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION RUTH
1125553-45535--
15726
4050474 MTA PASSES -APRIL OS
1,308.90 04/21/2005
1125553-45533--
15726
4050474 CITY SUBSIDY -APRIL
64977
05
512.10 04/21/2005
64977
TOTAL PREPAID CHPCK(S)
1,821.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,621.00
CELIA MEYER
001-23002--
19136 PK REFUND -HERITAGE 18299
200.00 04/21/2005
64978.
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
200.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
200.00
LAUREL MEYER
0015350 -41200 --
REIMS -SUPPLIES
140.04 04/21/2005
64979
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
140.04
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
140.04
ALISON D MEYERS
0015350-44000--
16058
CONSULTANT SVCS -WK 4/16
2,076.48 04/21/2005
64980
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
2,076.48
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,.076.48
MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT GROUP
0015350-42140--
15697
2169417 BLDG RENTAL-SYC CYN
PK
535.84 04/28/2005
65103
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
535.84
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
535.84
MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES INC
0014440-42130--
207014 REPEATER SVCS-MAR/APR /
78.65 04/28/2005 65104
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
78.65
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
78.65.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/26/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 17
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PD #
INVOICE
PREPAID
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
MUNICIPAL MGMT ASSOC OF SO CALIF
0014030-42315--
40505-9 MEMBERSHIP DUES-MCLEAN
50.00 04/21/2005
64981
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
MARIA NAGY
001-39780--
19131 RECREATION REFUND
170.00 04/21/2005
64982
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
170.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
170.00
NAKOMA GROUP LLC
0614070-44000--
15589
2715 CONSULTING SVCS -WK 4/3
450.00 04/21/2005
64983
0014070-44000--
15589
2772 CONSULTING SVCS -INFO SYS
300,00 04/28/2005
65105
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
750.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
750.00
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
0014090 -42315 --
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP - CITY
2,864.00 04/28/2005
65106
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
2,864.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,864.00
SHARON NEOH
001-34780--
19134 RECREATION REFUND
170.00 09/21/2005
64984
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
170.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
170.00
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0014090 -42130 --
AIRTIME CHRGS-P/W,C/S,C/D
537.62 04/28/2005
65107
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
537.62
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
537.62
DANIEL NOLAN
0015210-44100--
PLNG COMM -3/8,3/22
130-00 04/21/2005
64985
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
130.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
130.00
NORRIS REPKE INC
2505510-46411-01404-46411
16272
0970501 DESIGN SVCS -SLURRY
SEAL
565.00 04/21/2005
64986
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
565.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
565.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE:
18
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #{ INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT
DATE
CHECK
OFFICE MAX
0014060-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-H/R
47.82
04/21/2005
0014070-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-I/S
64988
0015333-41200--
77.59
04/21/2005
64988
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-DSC
123.49
04/21/2005
64988
0014070-46220--
PO 1565.7 OFFICE EQ-I/S
0014070-41200--
430.37
04/21/2005
64988
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-I/S
251.76
04/21/2005
64988
0014070-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-I/S
190.71
04/21/2005
64988
0014030-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-CITY MANAGER
6.01
04/28/2005
65108
0014095-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-PUBLIC INFO
256.53
04/28/2005
55108
0015210-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-PLNG
227.05
04/28/2005
65108
0014060-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-H/R
30.10
04/28./2005
65108
0015510-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS
8.29
04/28/2005
65108
0014030-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-CITY MANAGER
12.31
04/21/2005
64968
0015510-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS
49.08
04/21/2005
64988
0015510-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS
5.20
04/21/2005
64988
0014030-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-CITY MANAGER
7.35
04/21/2005
64988
0014090-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-GENERAL
20.97
04/21/2005
64958
0014070-46250--
PO 15657 OFFICE EQ-I/S
430.37
04/21/2005
64988
0015350-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-COMM SVCS
67.53
04/21/2005
64988
0015333-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-DSC
40.22
04/21/2005
64988
0014090-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-GENERAL
22.27
04/21/2005
64988
0014090-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-GENERAL
929-97
04/21/2005
64968
0015350-41200--
PO 15657 SUPPLIES-COMM SVCS
18.55
04/21/2005
64988
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
3,252.54
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
3,252,54
OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES
0015310-44000--
113321 TEMP SVCS-WK 4/10
59.58
04/21/2005
64989
0015310-44000--
113502 TEMP SVCS-.WK 4/17
69.51
04/28/2005
65109
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
129.09
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
-00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
129.09
ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
0014095-42115--
479199000 AD-BRIDAL FAIRE
264.96 04/28/2005
65110
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
264.96
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
264.96
ORIENTAL TRADING CO. INC
0015350-41200--
599096301-01 SUPPLIES-COMM SVCS
413.21 04/21/2005
64990
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
413.21
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
413,21
PAYROLL TRANSFER
001-10200--
PP 08/05 PAYROLL TRANSFER-OS/PP 08
100,700.00 04/21/2005 PP 08/05
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
100,700.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
100,700.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/20/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE:
19
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
PREPAID
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO 4 INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE
CHECK
PEPR GRAPHICS
0014095-42110--
1067 PRINT SVCS -BUS CARDS
510.00
04/28/2005
65111
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
510.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
510.00
PERS HEALTH
0014060-40093--
PP 07-08 ADMIN FEE -MAY 05
92.03
04/21/2005
64991
0014090-40086--
PP 07-08 ADMIN FEE -MAY 05
145.20
04/21/2005
64991
001-21105--
PP 07-08 MAY 05-HELATH. INS PREMS
19,580.54
04/21/2005
64991
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
19,617.77
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
19,817.77
PERS RETIREMENT FUND
0014010-40080--
PP 08/05 CC -RETIRE CONTRIE-EE/ER
449.42
04/21/2005
64992
001-21109--
PP 08/05 RETIRE CONTRIB-ER
7,416.27
04/21/2005
64992
001-21109--
PP 08/05 SURVIVOR BENEFIT
39.06
04/21/2005
64992
0014010-40090--
PP 08/05 CC -SURVIVOR BENEFIT
8.00
04/21/2005
64992
001-21109--
PP 08/05 RETIRE CONTRIB-EE
6,440.11
04/21/2005
64992
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
14,352.86
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
14,352.86
PETALS THE CLOWN
0015350-45300--
6/10/05 CLOWN -TINY TOTS
75.00
04/21/2005
64993
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
75.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
75.00
BRYAN PETROFF
0015333-41200--
REIMB-SUPPLIES
51.20
04/28/2005
65112
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
51.20
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
51.20
AMY PIATTONI
001-34780--
19443 RECREATION REFUND
65.00 04/28/2005
65113
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
65.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
65.00
POMONA JUDICIAL DISTRICT
001-32230--
FEB 05 PARKING CITATION FEE -FEB
1,940.00 04/21/2005
64994
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,940.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,940.00
POMONA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
0015350-42353--
05032 FACLTY RNTL-CITY B/DAY
150.00 04/28/2005
65114
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
150.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
150.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 20
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO 4
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
POMONA WHOLESALE ELECTRIC INC
0015333-42210--
1241950-001 SUPPLIES -DBC
16-37 04/21/2005
64995
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1(5.37
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
16.37
PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES
0015340-42210--
2153492 ALARM SVCS-SYC CYN PK
235-00 04/28/2005
65115
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
135.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
135.00
PURCHASE POWER
0014090-41200--
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
125.82 04/28/2005
65116
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
125.82
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
125.82
R & D BLUEPRINT
2505510-46411-18603-46411
08999 PRINT SVCS -GRAND AVE
403.14 04/21/2005
64996
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
403.14
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
403.14
R F DICKSON COMPANY
1155515-45500--
15610
2500146 DEBRIS SVCS -MAR 05
3,297.38 04/28/2005
65117
0015554-45501--
15611
2500144 STREET SWEEPING SVCS -MAR
8,999.46 04/28/2005
65117
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
12,296.64
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
12,296.84
RALPHS GROCERY/FOOD 4 LESS
0015350-41200--
15638
SUPPLIES -CITY B/DAY
16,16 04/28/2005
65118
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
16.16
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
16.16.
REINBERGER PRINTWERKS
0014095-44000--
16217
14307 PRINT SVCS -LETTERHEAD
945.02 04/28/2005
65119
0014090-42110--
14305 PRINT SVCS -GENERAL
192.69 04/21/2005
64997
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,137.71
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,137.71
REMEDY
0014030-44000--
1444755 TEMP SVCS-CMGR/HR WK 4/17
1,367,20 04/28/2005
65120
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,367.20
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,367.20
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 21
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO 4
INVOICE
PREPAID
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
0015554-45507--
15612
3477 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-MAR
4,200.68 04/28/2005
0015554-45507--
0015554-45507--
15.612
3544 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-MAR
6,361.61 04/26/2005
65121
65121
15612
3543 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-MAR
2,310.00 04/28/2005
65121
0015554-95507--
15612
3982 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-MAR
1,358.58 04/28/2005
65121
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
14,230.87
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
14,230.87
MARIA REYES
001-34780--
19165 RECREATION REFUND
80.00 04/21/2065
69998
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
80.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
80.00
RHF INC
1269411-42200--
44882 EQ MAINT-LASER
GUN
70.00 04/21/2005
64999
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
70.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
70.00
ANNA RIVERA
001-34780--
19274 RECREATION REFUND
40.00 04/28/2005
65122
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
40.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
40.00
ROADRUNNER EXTERMINATING INC
0015333-42210--
3812
MAINT-DBC
225.00 44/28/2005
65123
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
225.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
225.00
KAREN RODRIGUEZ
001-23002--
19137 PK REFUND -HERITAGE 18624
200.00 04/21/2005
65000
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
200.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
200.00
NANCY ROSS
O.9I-34780--
19453 RECREATION REFUND
60.00 04/28/2005
651.24
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
60.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
60.00
ROTO -ROOTER
0015340-42210--
074100 MAINT-PETERSON PK
43.5.00 04/21/2005 65001
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
435.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
435.00
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 22
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO 4
PREPAID
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE CHECK
SAMPSON GRAPHICS
0014095-44000--
16262
3111 GRAPHICS SVCS -PUBLIC INFO
774.5.3 04/28/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
65125
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
774.53
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
774.53
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CITY MGR ASSOC
0014030-42325--
MTG-LOWRY,CRBBNS,DESTEFAN
109.00 04/21/2005 65002
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
109.40
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
109.00
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE
0014030-42115--
15569
26956 LEGAL AD -ELECTION NOTICE
64.40 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
65003
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK($)
64.40
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
64.40
SCAN ALERT
0014070-96235--
16127
1827 COMP EQUIP -SOFTWARE
2,000.00 04/28/2005 65126
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
2,000.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,000.00
SECTRAN SECURITY INC
0015350-42353--
40595 COURIER SVCS-B/DAY CELEB
400.00 04/28/2005 65127
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
400.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
400.00
SHARP SEATING COMPANY
0015350 -45310 --
DEPOSIT -ROSE PARADE TCKTS
1,103,00 04/21/2005 65004
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,103.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
,D0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,103.00
WARREN SIECKE
2505510-R46412-19704-46412
15184
5384 ENG SVCS-G/SPRINGS/ADSL
606.50 04/21/2005 65005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
fi66-50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
606.50
MATT SLOVAK
001 -32230 --
DB 42060 REFUND -PARKING CITATION
120.00 04/21/2005 55006
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
120.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
120.00
SO COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIS
0014090-42140--
15601
LEASE -CITY HALL MAY 05
21,204.75 04/28/2005 65128
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
21,204.75
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
21,204.75
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
0015340-42126--
CHECK REGISTER
0015333 -42126 --
GAS SVCS -HERITAGE PK
108.67 04/28/2005
6.5130
GAS SVCS -DHC
2,163.17 04/28/2005
PAGE: 23
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
2,271-84
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
PREPAID
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
PO INVOICE DESCRIPTION
2,271.84
SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS
AMOUNT
DATE
CHECK
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
15734 OFFICIAL SVCS -4/5-4/19/05
1,564.00 04/28/2005
0015333-42126--
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1395539 -42126 --
ELECT SVCS -DBC
5,518.37
04/21/2005
65007
1415541-42126--
ELECT SVCS -DIST 39
TOTAL VUE VENDOR
466.24
04/21/2005
65007
1385538-92126--
ELECT SVCS -DIST 41
15.50
04/21/2005
65007
1385538-42126--
ELECT SVCS -DIST 38
14.00
04/21/2005
65007
1269911-92126--
ELECT SVCS -DIST 38
65008
44.50
04/21/2005
65007
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -SHERIFF
CTR
70.05
04/21/2005
65007
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
72,91
04/28/2005
65129
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
36.42
04/28/2005
65129
O D15S10-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
15.10
04/28/2005
65129
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
60.48
04/28/2005
65129
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
46.13
04/28/2005
65129
0015510-42126--
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
35.76
04/28/2005
65129
0015510-42125__
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
51.04
04/28/2005
65129
0015510 -42126 --
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
82.88
04/28/2005
65129
ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC
CONTRL
112.28
04/28/2005
65129
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
91673905 SUPPLIES -RECREATION
227,60 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
65009
6,641.66
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
227.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
227.60
6,641.66
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
0015340-42126--
0015333 -42126 --
GAS SVCS -HERITAGE PK
108.67 04/28/2005
6.5130
GAS SVCS -DHC
2,163.17 04/28/2005
65130
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
2,271-84
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.00
2,271.84
SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS
0015350-45300--
15734 OFFICIAL SVCS -4/5-4/19/05
1,564.00 04/28/2005
65131
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,564.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
TOTAL VUE VENDOR
.00
1,564.00
SPEC BUILDERS CORP
1255215-44000-60050304-44000
J-316-2044 HIP PROG-541 GREAT BEND
998.00 04/21/2005
65008
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
498.00
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
498.00
SPORT PINS INTERNATIONAL INC
0014095-41400--
16239 61795 2005 PINS-B/DAY CELEB
2,026.45 04/28/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
65132
2,026.45
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
co
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,026.45
SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC
0015350-41200--
91673905 SUPPLIES -RECREATION
227,60 04/21/2005
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
65009
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
227.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
.OD
227.60
RUN DATE; 04/28/2005 14:56:32
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
ST DENTS KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
0015350 -42353 --
STANDARD INSURANCE OF OREGON
001 -21106 --
001 -21106 --
001 -21112 --
STAR ECO STATION
0015350 -42410 --
STAR PROGRAM FUND 323
1264411 -41200 --
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0015510 -42315 --
STITCHES UNIFORMS k EMBROIDERY
0015350 -41200 --
STUBBIES PROMOTIONS
00.14095-41400--
SU13WAY
0014090 -42325 --
0014090 -42325 --
PAGE: 24
PREPAID
DINT DATE CHECK
21.00 04/28/2005 65133
21.00
.00
21.00
655.40 04/26/2005 65134
42.00 04/28/2.005 65134
1,259.89 04/28/2005 65134
1,957.29
.00
1,957.29
170.00 04/21/2005 65010
170,00
.00
170.00
299.22 04/21/2005 65011
299.22
.00
299.22
150.00 04/28/2005 65135
150.00
.00
150.00
1,023.74 04/28/2005 65136
1,023.74
.00
1,023.74
1,041.87 04/28/2005 65137
1,041.87
.00
1,041.87
14.37 04/21/2005 65012
14.37 04/21/2005 65012
28.74
.00
28-74
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
PO
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
4/17/05 FOOD REIMB-CITY B/DAY
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK($)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
PP 07-08 MAY 05 -LIFE INS PREM
PP 07-00 MAY 05-SUPP LIFE INS PREM
PP 07-08 MAY 05-STD/LTD
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK($)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
DEPOSIT -EXCURSION
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
4/11/05 SUPPLIES -STAR T-SHIRTS
TOTAL PREPAID CRECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
MEMBERSHIP DUES -D LIU
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
16284
6231 SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
16218
2110 PROMO ITEMS-B/DAY CELEB
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
15700
4/19/05 MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL
15700
4/5/05 MTG SUPLIES-GENERAL
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
PAGE: 24
PREPAID
DINT DATE CHECK
21.00 04/28/2005 65133
21.00
.00
21.00
655.40 04/26/2005 65134
42.00 04/28/2.005 65134
1,259.89 04/28/2005 65134
1,957.29
.00
1,957.29
170.00 04/21/2005 65010
170,00
.00
170.00
299.22 04/21/2005 65011
299.22
.00
299.22
150.00 04/28/2005 65135
150.00
.00
150.00
1,023.74 04/28/2005 65136
1,023.74
.00
1,023.74
1,041.87 04/28/2005 65137
1,041.87
.00
1,041.87
14.37 04/21/2005 65012
14.37 04/21/2005 65012
28.74
.00
28-74
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14;56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 25
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCTPREPAID
PO #
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
SUNGARD PENTA4ATION INC
0014070-46235--
16077
38730 MEMO CREDIT -FINANCE
-322.90 09/21/2005
0014070-46235--
16077
38541 FINANCE SYS MAINT-SOFTWAR
14,269.00 04/21/2005
65013
TOTAL PREPAID CHBCK(S)
13,966.10
65013
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
13,966.10
JACK TANAKA
0015210-44100--
PLNG COMM -3/8,3/22
130.00 04/21/2005
65014
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
130.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
130.00
TANDEM PRIVATE SECURITY
0015350-42353--
CD041605 SECURITY SVCS-B/DAY CELEB
238.00 09/28/2005
65138
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
238.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
236.00
TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS
0014070-44030--
16155
1569681-0 INTERNET SVCS
-T1
502.92 04J28/2005
65139
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
502.92
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
502.92
THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM AT LA HA2RA
0015350-42410--
5/27/05
EXCURSN-TINY TOTS
96.00 04/28/2005
65140
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
96.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
96.00
THE COMDYN GROUP
0014070-44000--
16214
C3632 CONSULTING SVCS -INFO SYS
810.00 04/28/2005
65141
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
810-00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
810.00
THOMSON WEST
0014030-42320--
15934
1936791 PUBLICATION -TAXATION
CODE
84.44 04/21/2005
65015
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
84.44
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
84.44
LIAR TJOKRO
001-34780--
19450 RECREATION REFUND
58.00 09/28/2005 6.5142
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
58.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
58.00
MARTIN TORRES
0015350-44100--
P & R COMM -4/13
45.00 04/28/2005 65143
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S}
45.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
45.00
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 19:56:32 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER PAGE: 26
DUE THRUe 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT—ACCT—PROJECT—ACCTPREPAID
PO q
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE
CHECK
TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
0015210-41200--
0015333-42200--
508859 SUPPLIES—TONER
25.00 04/21/2005
65016
A15786
5180226 COPIER MAINT—DBC
107.64 04/28/2005
65194
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
132.64
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK{S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
132.64
TRUGREEN LANDCARE
1395539-45500--
16141
1694135734 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 39
1385538-46410——
JAN
10,313.00 04/28/2005
65146
16251
1694260857 MEDIAN PLANTING—DIST 38
1385538-45500——
7,875.00 04/28/2005
65146
16141
1694135734 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 38 JAN
1415541_45500—-
5,311.00 09/28/2005
65145
16141
1694174615 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 41 FEB
1395539-45500——
A15736
3 247.00 04/28/2005
65146
0015340-45300——
1694251619 ADDL MAINZ'—DIST 39
600.00 04/28/2005
65146
16141
1694135734 C/WIDE MAINT—JAN 05
1415541-45500--
16141
7,426.00 04/28/2005
65146
0015390-45300——
1694135734 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 41 JAN
3,247.00 04/28/2005
65146
A15736
1699249283 ADDL MAINT—PARKS
1395539-45500——
990.00 04/28/2005
65146
1385538-45500--
16141
1694174615 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 39 FEB
10,313.00 04/2 8/2005
65146
1915541-45500——
1 6141
1694260395 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 38 MAR
5,311.00 04/26 /2005
65146
1415541-45500--
A15736
1694257316 ADDL MAINT—DIST 41
3,000.00 04/28/2005
65146
1385538-45500--
16141
1694260395 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 41 MAR
3,247.00 04/28/2005
65146
16141
1694174515 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 38 FRB
0015390-95300-—
5,311.00 09/28/2005
65146
16141
1694260395 C/WIDE MAINT—MAR 05
1395539-45500——
16141
1694260395
7,426.00 04/28/2005
65146
0015340-45300—-
C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 39 MAR
10,313.00 04/28/2005
65146
16141
1694174615 C/WIDE MAINT—FES 05
1395539-45500——
7,426.00 04/28/2005
65146
A15735
1694042246 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 39 DEC
1415591-95500——
4,389.33 04/21/2005
65017
0015340-45300--
A15735
1694042246 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 41 DEC
2,250-94 04/21/2005
65017
1385538-45500——
A15735
1694042246 C/WIDE MAINT—PARKS DEC04
6,096.73 04/21/2005
65017
A15735
1694042246 C/WIDE MAINT—DIST 38 DEC
4,210.91 04/21/2005
65017
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
108,303.91
TOTAL UNPAID C14ECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
108,303.91
STEVEN TYE
0015210-94100—-
PLNG COMM -3/8,3/22
130.00 04/21/2005 65018
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
130.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
130.00
EUGENIA URTECHO—MARTINEZ
001-34780--
19170 RECREATION REFUND
40.00 04/28/2005 65147
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
40.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
40.00
VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC
0015310-45518--
16288
3679223 SLOPE MAINT—DBC
9,636-00 04/28/2005 65148
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
918.36.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
9,836.00
VANGUARD VAULTS LA INC
0014070-45000--
16103
13413
TAPE STORAGE SVCS—APR OS
615.00 04/28/2005 65149
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
615.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
615.00
Y I
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 27
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS -303248
001-21108--
PP 08/05 4/20/05 -PAYROLL DEDUCTION
6,524.48 04/21/2005 65019
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
6,524.48
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
6,524.48
LORRAINE VELARDE
001-34780--
19168 RECREATION REFUND
36.00 04/21/2005
65020
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
36.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
36.00
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
0014090-42125--
0015340-42125--
9093999774 PH.SVCS-DATA MODEM
28.41 04/21/2005
65021
1185098-42125--
PH.SVCS-SYC CYN PK
90.67 04/21/2005
65021
0015333-92125--
PH.SVCS-DIAL IN MODEM
62.75 04/28/2005
65150
0015333-42125--
PH.SVCS-DBC
84.78 04/28/2005
65150
0015340-42125--
PH.SVCS-DBC
90.77 04/28/2005
65150
PH.SVCS-HERITAGE
59.14 04/21/2005
65021
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
416.52
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
416.52
VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SVCS
0014090-42125--
L8418988EI MESSAGING SVCS -MAR -MAY O5
-
364.39 04/28/2005
65151
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
364.39
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
364.39
VISION SERVICE PLAN
Y
001-21107--
PP 07-06 MAY 05 -VISION PREMIUMS
1,154.87 04/28/2005
65152
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
1,154,87
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
1,154.87
DANIELLE WAHID
001-34780--
18932 RECREATION REFUND
15.00 04/21/2005
65022
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
15.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
15.00
WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
0015340-42126--
1395539-42126--
WATER SVCS -PARKS
3,590.72 04/21/2005
65023
1415541 -42126 --
WATER SVCS-DIST 39
854.63 04/21/2005
65023
1385538-92126--
WATER SVCS-DIST 41
1,099.00 04/21/2005
65023
WATER SVCS-DIST 38
4,727.59 04/21/2005
65023
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
10,271.94
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
10,271.94
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE; 04/28/2005 14:56:32 CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 28
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROSECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY CORP
0015340-42210--
15886
SUPPLIES -HERITAGE PK
0015333-41200--
122.69 04/21/2005
65024
0015333-91200--
SUPPLIES-DBC
521.11 04/21/2005
65024
0015333-41200--
SUPPLIES -DBC
149.39 04/21/2005
65024
SUPPLIES -DBC.
46.55 04/21/2005
65024
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
839.74
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
839.74
WELLS FARGO BANK
0014010-42330-CC205-42330
GONSALVES DINNER -COUNCIL
207.90 04/28/2005
65153
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
207.9C
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
207.90
WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES
0014060-42347--
0014090-41400--
SUPPLIES-EMP RECGN
5.41 04/21/2005
65026
0014090-42325--
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
8.57 04/21/2005
65026
0014050-92320--
MTG SUPPLIES -GENERAL
65.00 04/21/2005
65026
0014060-42347--
PUBLICATIONS -FINANCE
134.00 04/21/2005
65026
0014090-42325--
SUPPLIES -EMP RECGN
41.07 04/21/2005
65026
0015350-41200--
MTC SUPPLIES -GENERAL
43.30 04/21/2005
65026
0014095-42112--
SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS
9.00 04/21/2005
65026
0015510-42325--
AD -BRIDAL FAIRE
624.00 04/21/2005
65026
0014030-42325--
LEAGUE CONF-LIU
425.00 04/21/2005
65026
0015210-41200--
MTG-CLARKE
182.31 04/21/2005
65026
0015350-92353--
SUPPLIES -PLUG
72.72 04/21/2005
65026
0015350-42315--
SUPPLIES-B/DAY CELE$
58.65 04/21/2005
65026
0014090-42128--
MEMBERSHIP DUES-BERENTIS
140.00 04/21/2005
65026
0015210-4232$--
BANK FEES
29.00 04/21/2005
65026
LEAGUE CONF-DESTEFANO
425.00 04/21/2005
65026
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
2,263.03
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,263.03
WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
0015558-45510--
15637
36370 WATERING SVCS
-MAR 05
553.80 04/28/2005
65154
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
553.80
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
553.80
WEST COAST MEDIA
0014095-42115--
16236
5062152 AD -MAY 05
475.00 04/28/2005
65155
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
475.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
475.00
WI SCTF
001-21114--
PP 07-08 SLRY ATTCHMT-1965778
77.88 04/21/2005 65027
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
77.88
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
77.89
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:55:32
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE: 29
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
PO #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
MARY WILSON
001-34780--
19135 RECREATION REFUND
85.00 04/21/2005
65028
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
95.00
HELEN WRIGHT
001-23002--
19149 PK REFUND-REAGAN 17074
50.00 04/21/2005
65029
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
50.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
PAUL WRIGHT
0014090-44000--
15656
4/21/05 A/V SVCS-P/C,CCMTG
227.50 04/29/2005
65156
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
227,50
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
227.50
XAVIERS FLORIST
0014095-44000--
FLRL ARRNGMNT-ST OF CITY
330.16 04/21/2005
65030
0014090-41400--
FLRL ARRNGMNT-PHILLIPS
70.37 04/21/2005
65030
0015350-41200--
FLRL ARRNGMNT-HULL
64.95 04/21/2005
65030
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
465-48
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
465.40
XEROX CORPORATION
0014090-42100--
15796
9230246 COPIER SVCS -MAR 05
647,86 04/21/2005
65031
0014090-42200--
15796
9230246 COPIER MAINT-MAR O5
459.68 04/21/2005
65031
0014090-42200--
15796
9230246 PRINT SVCS -MAR 05
1,133.50 04/28/2005
65157
0014090-42100--
15796
9230246 COPIER MAINT-MAR 05
459.66 04/28/2005
65157
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
2,700.72
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,700.72
KATHY XIAO
001-34780--
19133 RECREATION REFUND
85.00 04/21/2005
65032
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK{S)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
CARI YASUNO
0.01-34780--
19132 RECREATION REFUND
85.D0 04/21/2005
65033
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
85.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
85.00
JASON YEH
001-36610--
19324 PK REFUND -DHC 16945
400.00 04/28/2005 65158
TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS)
400.00
TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS)
.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
400.00
RUN DATE: 04/28/2005 14:56:32
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT
YOSEMITE WATERS
0015310 -42130 --
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER
DUE THRU: 04/28/2005
PO N INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15634 MAR00191998 EQ RENTAL -MAR 05
TOTAL PREPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL UNPAID CHECK(S)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
PAGE: 30
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
.12.00 04/21/2005 65034
12.00
.00
12.00
REPORT TOTAL PREPAID CHECKS 938,383.31
REPORT TOTAL UNPAID CHECKS _00
REPORT TOTAL 938,363.31
CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
TITLE: Treasurer's Statement — March, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the March 2005, Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No Fiscal Impact
BACKGROUND:
Agenda #
Meeting Date. May. 3, 2005
AGENDA REPORT
Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the Cit
Council's review and approval. This statement shows the preliminary cash balances for the various
funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective
yield earned from investments.
PREPARED BY:
Susan Full, Senior Accountant
Departme t ead
Attachments:
Treasurer's Statement
Deputy Ci )�Manacgjer
SUMMARY OEPOSF GASH:
MA
DEND DITS:
INVESTMENTS:
CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT:
GENERALACCOUNT
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHANGE FUND
10,748.82
TREASURER'S
MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
March 31, 2005
US TREASURY Money Market Acct.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD
$745,825.61
31 437 644.61
BEGINNING
$338,634.00
(Bond Proceeds Account)
150,084.45
BALANCE
RECEIPTSDISBURSEMENTS
TRANSFERS ENDING
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND
$23,774,537.49
$462,037.42
$1,329,612.48
BALANCE
COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FD
0.00
($10,920.44)
$22,896,041.99
GAS TAX FUND
TRANSIT TX(PROP A) FD527,139.67
{6,706.74)
85,413.61
2,102.00
0.00
(8,808.74)
TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD
ISTEA Fund
1,371,666.37
963,738.29
134,809.51
73,943.45
115,788.37
612.553.28
1,390,587.51
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
0.00
(15,599.76)
1,022 081 98
AB2928-TR CONGESTION RELIEF FD
567'832'99
25,832,66
19,911 02
0.00
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
00
573,754.63
PARK 8 FACILITIES REVEL. FD
COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD
164,5766.88,88
1,8,067.48
16,639.8$
55 849 54
0.00
125,367.22
CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY FD
(9
(9,941.38)
240,794.07
14,406.13
1,890,067.48
NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD
CA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP PRG
315'822.77
25.00
4,699.83
(24,347.51)
236,119.244
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
71,477.18
315,822.77
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
463 '849'38
274,888.37
10,918.65
71,477.18
452,930.73
GRANA AV CONST FUND
387.743.62
8,152.62
2 520 62
(677.50)
266,058.25
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
111'579'53
385,222.80
SELF INSURANCE FUND
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
(612,841.93)
1,319,644.12
49,753.45
13
(52'860.03)
80,057.73
58,718 50
(582,537.65)
FUND
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
195,932.19
,37.00
1, 318, 307.12
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY FUN(4,061.55)
511,984.33
195,932.19
TOTALS
$32 519,723.13
0.99
$798,702.52
23266.87
g1_F�a z�r �o
_ _
(4,061.55)
488,718.45
SUMMARY OEPOSF GASH:
MA
DEND DITS:
INVESTMENTS:
CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT:
GENERALACCOUNT
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
($1,003,580.62)
CHANGE FUND
10,748.82
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT
250.00
500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
US TREASURY Money Market Acct.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD
$745,825.61
31 437 644.61
US TREASURY Money Market Account
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD
$338,634.00
(Bond Proceeds Account)
150,084.45
($992,081.80)
32,183,470.22
488, 718.45
TOTAL CASH
$31,680,106.87
Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. There are two LAIF accounts set up. The
regular account's funds are available for withdrawal within 24 hours. The LAW Bond Proceeds account's withdrawals require 30 days notice.
As a secondary investment option, the City maintains the US Treasury Sweep Accounts with Wells Fargo and the City's Fiscal Agent, Union
Bank of California. Any excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis from the City's bank accounts and are invested overnight in a pool of US
Treasury Notes. Interest is credited to the City's bank accounts on a monthly basis.
L.A.I.F - Effective Yield - March 2005
Wells Fargo Money Mkt -Effective Yield - March 2005
Union Bank Money Mkt - Effective Yield - March 2005
2.542%
1.951%
2.450%
All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy.
The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's
estim ted expenditur
Linda C. Lowry, Treasurer
Agenda # 6-!i
Meeting Date: May 3, 2005
CITY COUNCIL _~ =' f AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage
TITLE: RENEWAL OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GENERAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution XX -2005, renewing the General Services
Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for the period from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2010.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City directly associated with the renewal of the General Services
Agreement. The City incurs expenses only for specific services requested from the County such as
law enforcement services through a contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
BACKGROUND 1 DISCUSSION:
The renewal of the General Services Agreement, which allows the City to contract with the County of
Los Angeles for basic services upon request, was approved by the City Council at the April 5, 2005
meeting. Two signed original copies of the agreement were sent to and received by Ron Morales at
the County. The County is now requesting that a resolution certifying the agreement be transmitted
to officially complete the process.
The General Services Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
Prepared by: Reviewed b�r
t1, �j .w
Ryan cLean, Senior Management Analyst David Doyle, ssistant City Manager
Attachment
1. Resolution 2005 -XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AUTHORIZING THE RENEWAL OF THE GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES.
WHEREAS, the General Services Agreement between the City of Diamond Bar and the County of
Los Angeles is general in nature and simply provides authority to the County to provide services as
formally requested; and
WHEREAS, renewing the agreement does not authorize the expenditure of City funds for any specific
service; and
WHEREAS, any request for a specific service that requires expenditure of City funds would require
additional authorization; and
WHEREAS, services provided to the County to the City include many basic services such as
predatory animal control, county prosecutor's services, and a wide range of public works activities;
and
WHEREAS, the renewal of this agreement would ensure the continuation of basic services currently
provided by the County and will leave Diamond Bar with the option of augmenting services in the
future.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar agrees to
renew the General Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles and directs the following:
SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall adopt the Resolution and the City
Clerk shall certify to the adoption.
SECTION 2. That certified copies of the resolution be circulated to the following:
Ron Morales, County of Los Angeles
Agenda #
Meeting Date: May 3, 2004
CITY COUNCIL �z12,���,
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of t City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager, 1,u
TITLE: Appropriate $25,000 from Prop A (Transportation Funds) for development of online
transit pass software
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $25,000 from Prop. A funds to develop a web -
based, software application to allow the sale of transit passes via the City's website.
Budget/Financial Impact:
There is approximately $1.3 million in reserved Prop A — Transportation Funds available for this
project.
Discussion:
The City contracted with Mr. Taylor Murphy in February 2005 to develop a software application that
will allow the City to sell transit passes online through its website. Originally the software
development services were going to be paid from the City's AB 2766 — Clean Air Funds which had
been appropriated in the FY 2004-05 budget for such applications. However, recently the City
secured permission to utilize Prop A — Transportation Funds for the project.
The City receives approximately $65,000 a year in Clean Air Funds with an available fund balance of
$120,000. These funds may be utilized for online applications that reduce vehicle trips to City Hall.
Each year the City receives $600,000 - $800,000 from Prop A and has a reserve fund balance of
approximately $1.3 million. Since AB 2766 funds may be use for a variety of online applications and
Prop A can only be used for transit related programs, staff recommends the City Council appropriate
Prop A funds for this project ($15,000 software development and $10,000 hardware).
When the project is completed in August and customers will be able to purchase transit passes online
rather than physically coming to City Hall. This will significantly enhance our service to the
community.
PREPARED BY
Dave Doyle, Assistant City Manager
Agenda # 6.7
Meeting Date: May 3, 2005
CITY COUNCIL i , �" AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Managua( _t,
TITLE: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARD
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $570,972 TO
MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION; AND AUTHORIZE A
CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $57,000 FOR CONTRACT CHANGE
ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL
AUTHORIZATION OF $627,972 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS (LEFT -TURN SIGNALS) ON
DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT SUNSET CROSSING ROAD,
NORTHBOUND SR -57 ON RAMP, AND COLD SPRING LANE; AND
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT DIAMOND BAR
BOULEVARD AND MAPLE HILL ROAD AND PATHFINDER ROAD
AND PEACEFUL HILLS ROAD.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve plans and specifications and award contract.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The traffic signal modifications and full intersection signalizations were approved as part
of the FY 2004-05 budget. The budget for this project is as follows:
Prop C Funds $636,000
General Funds {Prop A Funds Sale Swap} $140,000
Total Project Funding $776,000
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Based on the warrant studies, three intersections were recommended for the 2004-05
CIP budget for left -turn modifications and two intersections were included for full
signalization. The left -turn modifications are for the intersections of Diamond Bar
Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road, Northbound SR -57 On Ramp, and Cold Spring
Lane. Diamond Bar Boulevard at Maple Hill Road and Pathfinder Road at Peaceful
Hills Road have been approved for full signalization.
The City released plans and specifications to receive bids for construction of the five
traffic signals in March 2005. Bids were received from three contractors that were
publicly opened on April 21, 2005:
Macadee Electrical Construction $570,972
Steiney & Co. $738,630
Dynaelectric $781,383
The responsive low bidder is Macadee Electrical Construction. The contractor's license
has been checked with the State of California and the license is active and clear. The
scope of services will include construction of the traffic signal modifications and full
signalization, traffic signal interconnect, striping and signage. The project schedule is
tentatively set as follows:
Award Construction
Start Construction
Construction Completion
PREPARED BY:
May 3, 2005
May 31, 2005
September 10, 2005
Sharon Gomez, Senior Management Analyst Date prepared: April 26, 2005
REVIEWED BY:
D rd G. u, Director of Public Works Jam y eStefan Assistant City Manager
Attachment: Agreement
K,
AGREEMENT
The following agreement is made and entered into, in duplicate, as of the date executed
by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk, by and between Macadee Electrical
Construction,hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Diamond Bar,
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY."
WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received,
publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in the notice; and
WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of CONTRACTOR Macadee Electrical
Construction Inc. and;
WHEREAS, City has authorized the Mayor to execute a written contract with
CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment and material for installation of the Traffic Signal
Modifications at Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road, Northbound SR -57 On
Ramp, and Cold Spring Lane and the new traffic si nals at Diamond Bar Boulevard at
Maple Hill Road and Pathfinder Road at Peaceful Hills Road in the City of Diamond Bar.
agreed: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is
1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CONTRACTOR shall furnish all necessary
labor: tools, materials,_ appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the installation of the
aan111"u01 F%%Jdu dllu r-tRUUUyU1 rims Koamin
the City of Diamond Bar. The work to be performed in accordance with the plans and
specifications, dated March 9, 2005 (The Plans and Specifications) on file in the office of the
City Clerk and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the
instructions of the City Engineer.
2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY:
The Plans and Specifications are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof with
like force and effect as if set forth in full herein. The Plans and Specifications,
CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated April 4 2005, together with this written agreement, shall
constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and
finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance
with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR
whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any
inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the
provisions of this written agreement shall control.
3. TERMS OF CONTRACT
The CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work within One hundred 100
working days from the date of the notice to proceed.
The CONTRACTOR agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in
the amount of five hundred ($500.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains
incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof
from any monies due or that may become due the CONTRACTOR under this agreement.
Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of
liquidated damages.
4. INSURANCE: The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract
until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable
to City nor shall the CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on his
subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The
CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the
following policies of insurance:
a. Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the
CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance as proof
that he has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons
whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out
the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect
during the period covered by this contract.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor
Code, every CONTRACTOR shall secure the payment of compensation
to his employees. The CONTRACTOR, prior to commencing work, shall
sign and file with the City a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which
requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that Code, and I will comply with
such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this
contract."
b. For all operations of the CONTRACTOR or any sub -contractor in
performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following
minimum limits and coverage:
1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person;
$1,000,000 each accident.
2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each
person; $500,000 aggregate.
3) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each
person; $1,000,000 each accident.
4) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each
accident; $500,000 aggregate.
5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $9,000,000
each accident.
6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident.
C. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall:
1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City,
which is admitted to do business in the State of California.
2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, its officers,
agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid
documents to be so included;
3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or
owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon
to cover a loss under the policy;
4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words:
"It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be
canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until
thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such
cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a
registered letter."
5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to the City.
The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an
endorsement which:
1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities
specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional
insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b, by
reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations
Of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor in performing the work
provided for herein;
2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days'
written notice thereof given to City by registered mail.
e. The CONTRACTOR shall, within ten (10) days from the date of the notice
of award of the Contract, deliver to the City Manager or his designee the
original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or
deliver to the City Manager or his designee a certificate of the insurance
company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional
insured and other provisions required herein.
5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the
CONTRACTOR is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public works is performed, and not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that
regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is
required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of
3
such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, 21825 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any
interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at
the job site.
The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as penalty to City, not more than twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed for each calendar day or
portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing
rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any
subcontractor under him.
6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section
1777.5 of the Labor Code, and in accordance with the regulations of the California
Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the performance
of the work.
The CONTRACTOR is required to make contribution to funds established for the
administrative of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen
in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other CONTRACTOR'S on the public works
site are making such contributions.
The CONTRACTOR and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other
requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the
Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of
Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's
work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the CONTRACTOR and
any sub -contractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of
California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of
the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00)
for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any
sub- CONTRACTOR under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which the laborer, workman or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code.
8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and
subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such
travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements
filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
9. CONTRACTO'R'S LIABILITY:The City of Diamond Bar and its officers, agents
and employees (Idemnitees) shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any
loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or
4
other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or
persons, either workmen or employees of the CONTRACTOR, of his subcontractor's or the
public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or
in connection with the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for
any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from
any cause whatsoever.
The CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnitees against and will hold and save
Indemnitees harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property,
penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity,
corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the
work, operation, or activities of the CONTRACTOR, his agents, employees, subcontractors or
invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on
the part of City. In connection therewith:
a. The CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection
with any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will
pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in
connection therewith.
b. The CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the
CONTRACTOR or Indemnitees covering such claims, damages,
penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with
such work, operations or activities of the CONTRACTOR hereunder, and
the CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees harmless
therefrom.
C. In the event Indemnitees are made a party to any action or proceeding
filed or prosecuted against the CONTRACTOR for damages or other
claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities
hereunder, the CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to Indemnitees and any all
costs and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in such action or proceeding
together with reasonable attorneys' fees.
So much of the money due to the CONTRACTOR under and by virtue of the
contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has
been made of such actions or claims for damages as aforesaid.
This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in
addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law.
This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of
any insurance coverages which may have been required under this Agreement or any additional
insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees.
CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it,
hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting
within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of or incident to
activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Indemnitor regardless of any prior,
concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees.
5
' 04/27/2005 13:50 9096273772 MACALM ELECTRICAL N PAGE 01/01
04/27/2005 09:55 909-861-,3117 CITY C" DIAMOND EfR ._-rAUE 07
termination, CONTRACTOR shall >qiy be paid for servi;es rendenq,i and experims necessarily
incurred prior to the effective date ij: lkmninatlon.
IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, -hp parties hereto have executed this Agreement with all the
ibrmallties required by law on the ra si�Eartive dates set forth opposite thf!ir signatures.
State of California
"CONTRACTOR'S" License Na,_ 5832. C�10 �2 8ss c'^
. �ul��adaa ElQfaricel Cg.Li.�`
ANIS- nier Read
!-,JUno CA 91710
f D�rUT'
l'1TLE
C;fTY OF DIAMOND B 4R, CALIF0'2NIA
Agenda #_fi��
Meeting Date: 15103105
CITY COUNCIL -
,�,k,,� AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of,tbe City Council
ViA:�-
Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
TITLE: APPROVAL OF APPROPRIkTION OF $8,000 FOR FY 2004105 EXPANDED SUMMER DAY
PROGRAM, CAMP
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and appropriate funds.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The appropriation of $8,000 in expenditures will be off -set by the collection of $8,000 in
participant revenue.
BACKGROUND: The City of Diamond Bar has a tentative contract with the Diamond Bar Chinese School to provide
a summer day camp program for the coming summer. The day camp program will start on Monday, June 13 and continue
for eleven weeks until Friday, August 26. Total cost to provide this program will be $22,500, of which $8,000 will be
expended in the 2004/05 fiscal year, An equal amount of revenue wili be collected from program participants to recover the
cost for expenses. Since the program starts in June, the costs for program start-up, staff training and the first two and a half
weeks of the program need to be appropriated into the 2004105 FY budget. Revenue goals for the current fiscal year will be
increased by the same amount. The costs for the 2005/06 FY, $14,500, are included in a decision package to be considered
with the proposed 2005/06 FY budget.
DISCUSSION: The day camp program for Diamond Bar Chinese School will include between 10 and 50 participants per
week for up to 55 hours per week for 11 weeks. The final number of participants from the Diamond Bar Chinese School will
be determined after a parents meeting scheduled for May 14. The funds being requested in this report are sufficient to cover
the anticipated costs for the remainder of the current fiscal year. The program will be run at the Diamond Bar Chinese
School facilii an at eritage Park Community Center.
Bob Royal "
Director of Community Services
James DeStefano
Assistant City Manager
Agenda #
Meeting Date: May 3 2005
CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manag
TITLE: APPROVAL OF LEGISLATIVEUS BCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Legislative Subcommittee recommends that the City Council approve the proposed responses to
the legislative items identified below.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City based on the approval of these actions.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION:
The Legislative Subcommittee meets with staff on a regular basis to discuss and analyze proposed
legislation and its effects on the City. Following their meeting April 19, 2005, the subcommittee has
recommended action be taken on the following pieces of legislation:
• AB 317 (Margett) - Increases penalties for who anyone who attempts to evade a peace
officer (i.e. high speed vehicle pursuits) by adding county jail or prison time based on the
severity of the attempt.
Recommended Action: Support
The attached letter of support will be sent to Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, Joe A.
Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities.
• SB 435 (Hollingsworth) — Amends state planning and zoning law to require cities to provide
additional density bonuses and incentives to developers who donate land within a
development or build lower income units within the development. Diminishes local land use
authority by forcing cities to lower zoning and architectural standards for these developers.
Recommended Action: Oppose
The attached letter of opposition will be sent to Senator Hollingsworth, Assemblyman Huff,
Senator Margett, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities.
• SB 926 (Florez) -- Prohibits a local public agency (in this case, the L.A. County Sanitation
District) from exporting treated biosolids processed in that county to another county. The bill
would limit beneficial reuse programs and could force the construction of new treatment
facilities, leading to higher rates for users.
Recommended Action: Oppose
The attached letter of opposition will be sent to Senator Florez, the L.A. County Sanitation
District, Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, and the League of California Cities — L.A.
Division.
• SB 1059 (Escutia) —Authorizes the California Energy Commission to designate an electric
transmission line corridor zone on its own motion or by application of a person who plans to
construct a high voltage electric transmission line. The bill would limit local land use authority
and the effectiveness of local zoning and planning ordinances.
Recommended Action: Oppose
The attached letter of opposition will be sent to Senator Escutia, the Senate Committee on
Appropriations, Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, and the League of California Cities.
• AB 835 (Huff) — Limits the allotted time for the collection of signatures on a petition designed
to reorganize a community college board from an indefinite period to 180 days. The recent
attempt to reorganize the Mt. SAC Board of Trustees, which was opposed by the City Council,
was the result of a petition that had accumulated signatures over several years.
Recommended Action: Support
The attached letter of support will be sent to Assemblyman Huff, Senator Margett, and Mt.
SAC President Christopher O'Hearn.
• AB 877 (Huff) — Allows peace officers to remove an individual suffering from a physical or
mental impairment not related to drug or alcohol intoxication from the operation of a motor
vehicle. Allows officers to use an Issuance of Priority Re -Examination on site. This measure
seeks to prevent incidents such as the tragedy involving the elderly driver at the Santa Monica
Farmer's Market.
Recommended Action: Watch
• AB 1145 (Huff) — Relates to the California Rehabilitation Organization's employment program
for the developmentally disabled. Reduces the supervisor/employee ratio from 4-1 to 3-1.
Recommended Action: Watch
SB 142 (Florez) — Intended to limit school superintended severance packages. Provides that
superintendent severance packages may not exceed the monthly salary multiplied by six, and
that a superintendent must be on the job a minimum of 12 months to be eligible for a
severance package.
Recommended Action: Watch
• AB 888 (De La Torre)/AB 1222 (Jones)/SB 459 (Romero) — These three bills are sponsored
by the South Coast AQMD (SCAQMD), and would allow for new air quality regulations for
owners, operators, and lessees of rail yards and locomotives. They would allow for the
SCAQMD to impose a fee to cover the cost of an emission reduction program.
Recommended Action: Watch
• AB 1248 (Umberg) — Amends current law allowing counties to bill local agencies with their
own police departments for booking fees related to the processing of persons into county jail
facilities by limiting billing to the processing of non -felonious offenses and all municipal code
violations.
Recommended Action: Watch
• AB 373 (Bermudez) —AKA the David March Officer Safety Act, would allocate $7,000,000
from the general fund to the U.S. Dept. of Justice to conduct a study comparing the safety and
efficiency of two officer patrol car deployment as compared to one officer patrol car
deployment.
Recommended Action: Watch
Please find additional information regarding the above issues in the attached Legislative
Subcommittee Watch List.
Prepared by:
Rya McLean, Senior Management Analyst
Attachments:
1. Legislative Subcommittee Watch List — 4.25.05
David Doyle, ssis n ity Manager
2. Letter of support for SB 317 (Margett) to Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, Joe A.
Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities.
3. Letter of opposition to SB 435 (Hollingsworth) to Senator Hollingsworth, Senator Margett,
Assemblyman Huff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California Cities,
4. Letter of opposition to SB 926 (Florez) to Senator Florez, the L.A. County Sanitation District,
Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the League of California
Cities — L.A. Division.
5. Letter of opposition to SB 1059 (Escutia) to Senator Escutia, the Senate Committee on
Appropriations, Senator Margett, Assemblyman Huff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son, and the
League of California Cities.
6. Letter of support for AB 835 (Huff) to Assemblyman Huff, Senator Margett, Joe A. Gonsalves &
Son, and the League of California Cities.
2005 Legislative
Watch List
Bill Author Descrintion
—
Potential Imaacts
AB 194 Dymally Removes the opportunity for Cities to
Encourages litigation and may
3131 make "good faith" efforts Brown Act
force legal action against cities.
violations prior to the commencement
May risk future decisions of
of any legal action.
city gov't based on constant
threat of litinatinn
AB 260 Bermudez Requires California Fire Depts. to prepare a report that This bill would increase fire staff
3131 compares state response times and staffing levels
9 costs and sets response time
to those at the national level according to and other standards that are
FEMA statistics nearly impossible for smaller
cities to match.
This bill is a reintroduction of
last session's AB 2406 which
was opposed in a council reso.
and b the CA League of Cities.
SB 148
3131-
Scott
Amends code to allow cities to establish reasonable
Currently, cities can only
4119
Letter of
amortization periods and termination of, or imposition of
p
enforce zoning ordinances
OPPOSED
conditions on legal nonconforming uses pursuant to, a
that were in effect when
sent 4.6
validly enacted zoning ordinance. These provisions
a licensee secured a license
Hearing 514
4/6/2005
would now apply to liqour stores which had operated
This bill would allow cities
prior to the effective date of the zoning ordinance.
to pass new ordinances and
CITY OF PASADENA HAS REQUESTED SUPPORT
enforce them on premises
Also see AB 744 Oro eza regarding the same issue
that had been exempt.
Provides for greater local
control and law enforcement
capabilities.
CA Jenkins feels there is little
impact on Diamond Bar
Status
Recom.
Letter of
opposition
OPPOSED
Letter
sent 4.6
sent
Hearing 514
4/6/2005
Opposition
sent 4.6
Passed comm. 417
Hearing
Committee on
Governmental
Organization
4126105
OPPOSED
Letter
sent
416!2005
NO POS.
ACA 7 Nation + Proposes a constitutional amendment that would
Gives local government greater No action to report WATCH
3131 would allow local agencies to impose a special tax
with the approval of 55% of voters rather than 213.
Would no to the DeoDle for vote_
AB 435 Hollingsworth Amends several pieces of Planning & Zoning law,
4119 which requires cities to provide density bonuses or
Incentives to developers that donate land or build
lower income housing within the development.
If passed, the bill would include mobile home parks for
seniors as eligible for bonuses and require cities to offer
additional bonuses to developers in the instance that
they receive density bonuses but can use less than
Developers would no longer be required to apply for a
waiver/reduction of development standards to show that
a waiver is necessary to make units affordahlp_
flexibility in obtaining special
funds needed for services.
SUPPORTED BY CA LOC
Requires cities to provide add'l
con cessions/bon uses to
developers. Diminishes good
land use plans and architectural
standards by increasing
densities up to 35%. Results in
more demands on traffic, water
schools, etc.
OPPOSED BY LEAGUE OF CA
CITIES
May be heard in
committee
Committee j OPPOSE
Meeting 414
AB
1248
Umberg
Amends current law allowing counties to bill agencies
While the bill would have little
Referred to Comm.
WATCH
4119
with city police departments for booking fees related to
initial Impact on Diamond Bar as
on Local Gov't
the processing of persons into county jall facilities
a contract city, we may be faced
3/17/2005
by limiting billing to the processing of non -felonious
with the Inclusion of booking
offenses and all municipal code violations.
fees in our next Sheriffs contract
SB 317
4119
SB 926
4119
AB 373
4119
Margett
Florez
Bermudez
Increases the penalties for those who attempt to evade
a police officer by adding time in countyjail or state prison
based on the severity of the attempt.
Prohibits a local public agency from exporting treated
biosolids processed in that county to any other county.
LA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT REQUESTS OUR
Deputy David March Officer Safety Act
Allocates $7,000,000 from the General Fund to the
Dept. of Justice to conduct a study comparing the safety
and efficiency of two officer patrol car deployment as
Should reduce the amount of
high speed chases and related
injuries to innocent bystanders,
including pedestrians and drivers,
as well as police officers by
providing for prison sentences
for convicted violators.
Little effect on the City of DB, but the
bill would reduce opportunities to
resue and recycle biosolids in
a beneficial way. May result in
passed on costs to users
Impacts state budget during the
current budget crisis. In the
future, may impact cities by
increasing costs of policing
Hearing PostponedI SUPPORT
3/29/2005
Amended 414 OPPOSE
Re-referred to Sen.
Committee on Env.
Quality
Hearing 512
Referred to comm. WATCH
on Public Safety
2123!2005
compared to one officer car deployment
services. The mandated
deployment of two officer cars
may become too expensive, cutting
the number of patrol cars on our
streets
AB 835
Huff
Would limit time for the collection of signatures on a petition
Would further protect Mt SAC
Hearing 4120
SUPPORT
4119
designed to reorganize a community college board from an
from additional reorganization
Asm. Coormmittee
indefinite period to 3 months or 180 days.
attempts as happened recently.
Education
Mt. SAC requests support
AB 877
Huff
Allows police officers to remove an individual suffering
Designed to avoid incidents such
Passed Comm.
4119
from a physical or mental impairment not related to drug or
as the Santa Monica Fam7ers
on Trans. 4111
WATCH
alcohol abuse from the operation of a motor vehicle
Market tragedy. No immediate
Referred to Comm.
upon Issuance of a Priority Re -Examination. The vehicle
city impacts, but may impact senior
on Appropriations
may be released to another driver in good standing until
drivers.
the individual asses a re-examintation.
AB
1145
Huff
Changes number of individuals in a CA Rehabilitaion
No significant city impacts. Allows
Hearing 4126
WATCH
4119
Association work group from 4 to 3. These work groups
for increased contributions of
Assm. Committee on
NO POS.
place developmentally disabled individuals with local
developmentally disabled to the
Human Services
employers under the direction of a job supervisor paid by
local workforce.
the state. Individuals in the work groups are paid by their
em to ers.
AB 888
De La Torre
These bills ares
sponsored by the AQMD, and would allow
Increases
AB 888: Hearing
AB
cast of goods
4/18
WATCH
1222
Jones
for new regulation of rail yard and locomotive emissions,
movement by train, leading to
SB 459
Romero
They would allow the AQMD to impose a fee on the owners,
increased truck traffic. Could also
AB 1222: 4/25
4119
operators, and lessees to cover costs of a South Coast
result in improved air quality
AQMD program to reduce emissions.
and provide a chance to work
SB 459: Hearing
in cooperation with AQMD in
postponed 4/14
AQMD requests support.
advance of the 57160 interchange
O osed b Huff Fee Increases
ro ecE.
SB 44
Kehoe
Requires City to amend its general plan to
Unknown costs to fund study
Referred to Senate
Watch
include data/analysis, updated policy, and
and secure data for inclusion
Committee on
implementation strategy to improve local air
n updated general plan.
Appropriations
312105
uali within one year from the date specified.
SB
1060
Campbell
P
Allows Legislature to enact changes to code
May allow cities to collect a
May reach
committee
Watch
allowing cities within a county to contract/negotiate
larger share of property tax
on or after 3/26105
to exchange allocations of local sales/use tax for
revenue. Terms of exchange of
allocations of ad valorem property lax revenues
sales tax for property tax are
between the city.and county.
unknown at this time.
SB 321
Morrow
Requires cities determine how there is a rough
May require a study/report
Hearing 5/20/05
Watch
proportionality between a fee's use and the type
showing the proportionality of
of development project on which the fee is imposed
each fee levied in comparison
when collecting fees in connection with development.
to the project, May result in
additional city costs.
AB
1234
Salinas
This bill would require adoption of a
written policy explaining qualifying instances of
In committee -
Watch
Hearing postponed
reimbursement for travel, meals, & lodging.
Expense reports would become public record.
3/29/2005
In addition, legislators and designated staff would
be required to attend ethics training.
If passed, this measure would be considered a
state -mandated program, and the state would be
required to reimburse certain costs subject to some
revisions.
SB 142
Florez
Requires a school superintendent to have a minimum of
Designed to limit school
Amended 3/29/05
Watch
12 months of service to be eligible for severance
administrator severance
Re -Referred to
packages, and authorizes the state to reduce any package
packages
Sen. Comm_ On
that exceed the monthly salary multiplied by six (6).
Amended to clearly refer to school
Local Government
Also bans employerlboard from negotiating with
superintendents
su erintendent in the 60 days preceding an election.
AB
1013
Garcia
Mandates that in the event of a vacancy in an elected
Could cut costs of a special
Referred to Comm.
Watch
office, the council shall fill the vacancy within 30
election, but may not be in the
on Local Gov't.
days by appointing the person with the third-highest
best interest of the City. Does
3/17/2005
number of votes at the previous election for that
not take into account variables
office. If that person is not available, declines
that may have changed since
appointment, or cannot be appointed, the council
the time of the election.
shall then call a special election to be held at the
next election date not less than 114 days from the
call of the special election
f
AB 463
Tran
Expands provisions in Brown Act regarding closed
No fiscal impact on City.
Passed committee
Watch
sessions. Includes threats to private property/facilities
Further expands Brown Act
3/30/2005
that are open to the general public and the discussion
protection. May increase
of responsive and preventive strategies relating to
cooperation between agencies.
these threats as credible reasons for council to hold
closed meetings with appropriate officialslauthorities.
AB 11
De La Torre
Prohibits a City Council from authorizing additional compensation
Passed Committee
Watch
for its members for any purpose in an amount exceeding the existing
To Senate 4125
salary schedules unless authorized by statute. Also prohibits
Council Members from receiving compensation in excess of $150
per month for participation on a commission, committee, board, or
authority created by or under the jurisdiction of the City Council,
unless specified by another statute.
Traveling ex enses would not be included as compensation.
April 28, 2005
Senator Bob Margett
California State Capitol, Room 3082
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: City of Diamond Bar Support of SB 317 (Margett)
Dear Senator Margett:
Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill,
SB 317, which would increase the penalties for those who attempt evade a police officer in a vehicle
pursuit by adding the possibility of jail or prison time. The subcommittee recommended to the full City
Council that they support SB 317 (Margett). Subsequently, on May 3, 2005, the Diamond Bar City
Council voted to support SB 317 (Margett).
Those who choose operate a vehicle in an attempt to evade a peace officer endanger the safety and
lives of both peace officers and private citizens. SB 317 (Margett) will serve as a deterrent by
enhancing the possibility of prison sentences for offenders that choose to put lives at risk.
The City of.Diamond Bar is committed to the safety of all of our citizens and peace officers. It is our
strong belief that SB 317 (Margett) will play a positive role in maintaining safe communities
throughout our state. The City of Diamond Bar is proud to join the League of California Cities in
supporting this bill.
Respectfully,
Wen P. Chang
Mayor
CC: City Council/CM/ACM's
Assemblyman Bob Huff
Senator Bob Margett
Joe A. Gonsalves & Son
California League of Cities
April 28, 2005
Senator Dennis Hollingsworth
California State Capitol, Room 5064
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: City of Diamond Bar Opposition to SB 435 (Hollingsworth)
Dear Senator Hollingsworth:
Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill,
SB 435, which would require cities to provide additional concessions density bonuses to developers.
The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that they oppose SB 435. Subsequently, on
May 3, 2005, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to oppose SB 435 (Hollingsworth).
By offering further incentives to developers and removing the existing requirement for a developer to
demonstrate the necessity of a reduction in development standards, local control of General Plans,
zoning ordinances, and development standards is diminished. The reduction of developmental
standards will decrease setbacks, parking spaces, and design requirements, negatively affecting
community acceptance of such a project. Additionally, the increased densities of these developments
will generate additional traffic on our streets and further tax our schools, water and energy supplies,
and other important infrastructure.
It is our strong belief that land use decisions should be made at the local level, where officials
understand the effects of the development on the community best. Ultimately, SB 435
(Hollingsworth) limits the control of these decisions. The City of Diamond Bar joins the League of
California Cities in fundamentally opposing this bill.
Respectfully,
Wen P. Chang
Mayor
CC: City Council/CM/ACM's
Assemblyman Bob Huff
Senator Bob Margett
Joe A. Gonsalves & Son
California League of Cities
April 28, 2005
Senator Dean Florez
California State Capitol, Room 5061
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: City of Diamond Bar Opposition to SB 926 (Florez)
Dear Senator Florez:
The City of Diamond Bar respectfully opposes your proposed bill, SB 926, prohibiting a local public
agency from exporting biosolids processed by that agency to any other county.
As proposed, SB 926 would adversely impact attempts to reuse and recycle treated wastewater in an
environmentally positive way. By limiting the export of treated biosolids, beneficial reuse programs
are discouraged, increasing reliance upon landfills and other less environmentally sound options.
Such legislation would also limit the effectiveness of treatment facilities with inter -county use
agreements. These beneficial use projects between counties would be compromised, leaving urban
counties with no way to handle the increased compliance standards. To manage, sanitation districts
would be required to build new treatment facilities, leading to probable rate increases for our
residents. Simply because it is a "government" issue does not mean that the people served should
be deprived of the common sense benefits of economies of scale.
SB 926 undermines efforts of sanitation districts to operate efficiently and in an environmentally
friendly manner. The City of Diamond Bar joins the Los Angeles County Sanitation District in
fundamentally opposing this bill.
Respectfully,
Wen P. Chang
Mayor
CC: City Council/ACM's
L.A. County Sanitation District
League of California Cities — L.A. Division
Senator Bob Margett
Assemblyman Bob Huff
April 28, 2005
Assemblyman Bob Huff
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0060
RE: City of Diamond Bar Support of AB 835
Dear Assemblyman Huff:
Recently, the Diamond Bar City Council Legislative Subcommittee met to review your proposed bill,
AB 835 (Huff), which would limit the time for the collection of signatures on a petition designed to
reorganize a community college board. The subcommittee recommended to the full City Council that
they support AB 835 (Huff). Subsequently, on May 3, 2005, the Diamond Bar City Council voted to
support AB 835 (Huff).
Currently, petitioners have an indefinite period of time to collect the necessary number of signatures
needed to bring a reorganization attempt to hearing before the county committee. AB 835 (Huff)
would limit this time period to 180 days, allowing for more legitimate petitions and increased efficiency
of the county committee.
The City of Diamond Bar is committed to promoting quality educational systems. It is our strong
belief that this bill is in the best interests of our local students and schools. We are proud to support
AB 835 (Huff).
Respectfully,
Wen P. Chang
Mayor
CC: City Council/CM/ACM's
Assemblyman Bob Huff
Senator Bob Margett
Joe A. Gonsalves & Son
California League of Cities
Agenda 4 -6-10
Meeting Date: May 3 2005
CITY COUNCIL '' Y
_ � AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Managfa> ,"_K_
TITLE: APPROPRIATE NECESSARY FUNDS FROM THE INTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT SPECIAL FUND AND APPROVE
CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT WITH HILTON,
FARNKOPF AND HOBSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,300 FOR
AUDIT OF SOLID WASTE HAULER SERVICES AND
AUTHORIZE A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $5,000, TO BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL
AUTHORIZATION AMOUNT OF $40,300.
RECOMMENDATION:
Appropriate funds and approve contract.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The proposed services, in the amount of $40,300, will be funded by the City's
Integrated Waste Management Fund. In FY 2004-05, only $5,000 was budgeted
for professional services. The amount of $35,300 will be appropriated from
available AB 939 Fund Balance Reserves which currently total approximately
$500,000.
BACKGROUND:
The current contracts for both residential and commercial services were awarded
in August 2000 for a term of 10 years. As the midpoint of the contract with Valley
Vista Services and Waste Management approaches, it behooves the City to seek
a thorough, independent evaluation in order to ensure that all contractual
obligations/requirements are being met; including quality of customer service,
verification of the accuracy of billing for services, verification of accuracy of AB
939 fee remittances, review and evaluate the City's monthly recycling progress
report, etc. This evaluation shall be conducted by a third -party consultant who
has been selected through the Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
DISCUSSION:
The RFP for these services was released on Friday, February 11, 2005 with a
closing date of Thursday, March 3, 2005. The proposals received are as follows:
Company Fee ProMosal
Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson, LLC $59,000
Brown, Vence and Associates, Inc. $31,459
Huls Environmental Management, Inc. $21,000
All of the proposals received were reviewed and rated by a panel of three (3)
staff members. Since the RFP provided general parameters regarding the type
and scale of services that staff anticipated may be required for a thorough audit
of the City's solid waste haulers, each proposal ranged in depth, scope and
project duration. Based on these factors, staff met with the firm deemed most
qualified to meet the City's needs, Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson. Their well-
rounded background exceeded the others in the type and scale of services
provided, prior experience with Southern California cities, as well as the project
team's qualifications.
In contrast, Brown, Vence and Associates' Project Team did not include a C.P.A.,
had limited experience in auditing similar cities in our region, and were based out
of Northern California and San Diego. Lastly, Huls Environmental Management
was at a disadvantage as they had previously assisted in drafting and negotiating
the existing solid waste hauler service contracts which defeated the project
proposal premise of using a third -party, independent consultant to evaluate the
City's contracted haulers.
Tasks to be completed
Upon further consideration of all of the City's special needs and expectations,
staff requested Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson submit a revised/enhanced scope of
work and fee proposal which resulted in a new total amount of $35,300.
Staff compared the top two (2) fee proposals (Attachment 2). Hilton, Farnkopf
and Hobson's scope of work includes, but is not limited to, the following items:
o Review and evaluate the Contractors' Handling of Customer Complaints
o Verify the Accuracy of Customer Billing
o Verify the Accuracy of AB 939 Administrative Fee Remittances
o Review and Evaluate the City's "Monthly Recycling Progress Report"
Staff verified the consultants' business license and insurance and found them to
be current and valid. Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson have satisfactorily completed
similar projects for many other cities in Southern California.
Page 2 of 3
The project schedule is tentatively set as follows:
Award of Contract
Start of Mid-term Review
Completion of Mid-term Review
PREPARED BY:
Javier Peraza, Management Analyst
REVIEWED BY:
avid . Liu
Director of Public Works
Attachments:
1. Consulting Services Agreement,
Including Fee Proposal
2. Comparison of Proposals
May 3, 2005
May 4, 2005
July/August 2005
eDeSteno
ty Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 3`d day of May 2005, between the City of
Diamond Bar, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Hilton,
Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the
performance of professional services with respect to
("Project" hereafter) and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
(ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of
such services, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"
and by this reference made a part hereof.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services
necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and
is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and
CONSULTANT as follows:
B. Agreement.
Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms,
except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires:
(a) Project: The preparation of the solid waste audit
described in Exhibit "A" hereto including, but not limited to, the
preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the
presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys,
reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any
and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings
conducted by CITY with respect to the assigned project.
(b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be
performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the assigned
project.
(c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases of the
Project, including any and all procedures, maps, surveys, plan
documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and
attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the
approval of the final report as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project
in accordance with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with
Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations, ordinances and
guidelines, and professional standards, all to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports,
plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as
described in Exhibits "A" and "B" to CITY within the time specified
in Schedule of work in Exhibit "A". Copies of the documents shall
be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A". CITY may
thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments
regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter
make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary.
CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the
quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth
pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be extended upon written
approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense,
secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of
CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this
Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by
CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons
shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder.
CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be
retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval
of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $40,300 for the
performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall
cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs
or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and
subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by
CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth
below.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance
with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis,
and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said
invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be in accordance
with CONSULTANT's proposal either with respect to hourly rates or
lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will
said invoices exceed 95% of the total budget described in Exhibits
"A" and "B" until the project is complete.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to
pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum
payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents,
together with all supplemental technical documents, as described
herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall
be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final
documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in
writing, by CITY, and not included in CONSULTANT's proposal as
set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a time -and -materials
reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth
in said Exhibit "A". Charges for additional services shall be
invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a
reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY agrees to rp ovide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other
information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary
in order to complete the Project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files
applicable to the Project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other
governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with
respect to the gathering of such information.
5. Ownershb of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the
property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by
CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be
delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however,
make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as
CONSULTANT may desire.
6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving
of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event
this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at
CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "A", on a
pro -rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as
of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT
receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above.
CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports,
whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the date of
termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for
cause.
7. Notices and Designated ated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands,
invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be
addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals,
furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the
performance by the parties under this Agreement:
City of Diamond Bar Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC,
Attn: David G. Liu Attn: Laith Ezzet
21825 Copley Dr. 3990 Westerly Place, Suite 195
Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Newport Beach, CA 92660
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by
mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight
(48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid
and properly addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this
Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a
company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow
any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance
required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall
take out and maintain at all time during the term of this Agreement the
following policies of insurance:
(a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work,
CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as
proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for
all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors
in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the
laws of the State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section
3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to
his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall
sign and file with CITY a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of Labor Code which
require every employer to be insured against liability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement"
(b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this
Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense,
CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and
effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT,
comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile
insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or
property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing
protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for
property damage, bodily injury or death to any one person or for
any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) aggregate.
(c) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by
express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in
responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the
State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and
(b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials,
officers, employees, agents and representatives. All policies shall
contain language, to the effect that: (1) the insurer waives the right
of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers,
employees, agents and representatives; (2) the policies are primary
and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by
CITY; and (3) they cannot be canceled or materially changed
except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by
certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all
such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate
evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own
account insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save
harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and
employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or
property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal
costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of the acts and/or
omissions of CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, but
not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent
permitted by law.
10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation
of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by
CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT
and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under
this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be
employees of CITY.
12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce
any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal
proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the
opposing party in an amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
14. Mediation: Any dispute or controversy arising under this Agreement, or in
connection with any of the terms and conditions hereof, shall be referred
by the parties hereto for mediation. A third party, neutral mediation service
shall be selected, as agreed upon by the parties and the costs and
expenses thereof shall be borne equally by the parties hereto. In the
event the parties are unable to mutually agree upon the mediator to be
selected hereunder, the City Council shall select such a neutral, third party
mediation service and the City Council's decision shall be final. The
parties agree to utilize their good faith efforts to resolve any such dispute
or controversy so submitted to mediation. It is specifically understood and
agreed by the parties hereto that referral of any such dispute or
controversy, and mutual good faith efforts to resolve the same thereby,
shall be conditions precedent to the institution of any action or proceeding,
whether at law or in equity with respect to any such dispute or
controversy.
U4/12/2005 09:23 9492519741 HFH PAGE 04/04
whether at law or in equity with respect to any such dispute or
controversy.
15- Entire A re_g ement: This Agreement supersed,:�s any and all other
agreements, either oral or in writing, , )etween thr parties with respect to
the subject matter herein. Each partf to this Ai,,reement acknowledges
that no representation by any party wl ich is not embodied herein nor any
other agreement, statement, or promi ye not co ilained in this Agreement
shall be valid and binding. Any mod fication of chis Agreement shall be
effective only if it is in writing signed bti all pai#ies
IN WITNESS WHEREOI=, the pa Iies hersto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first set forth abo re:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
COPIS TANT /
tF Fz. �Fpre iAAi
CIT (OF DIAMOND BAR
Linda L�3�E ry, City Manager
Linda Lawry, City Clerk
Wen P. Chang
Mi yor
Deborah H. O'Connor
ktivor Pro Toni
Carol Herrera
Council Llemhvr
Bob Zirbes
Council Memher
February 11, 2005
EXHIBIT A
City of Diamond Bar
211325 Copley Drive • Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178
(909) 839-7000 • Fax (909) 861-3117
www.CityniDiamond13ar.com
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT
FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE BY COMMERCIAL &
RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULERS
To Interested Consultants/Firms:
INTRODUCTION:
The City of Diamond Bar (City) is requesting proposals from qualified firms to audit
all of its current waste haulers' records relating to the service provided under
contract for the period of August 2000 to December 2004. Copies of the
PROPOSALS SHALL BE DELIVERED IN A "SEALED FASHION" NO LATER
THAN 5:00 P.M. ON THURSDAY, MARCH 3, 2005.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Diamond Bar presently has one (1) exclusive residential hauler, Waste
Management Inc. (WMI) and one (1) exclusive commercial hauler, Valley Vista
Services. Cumulatively, there are approximately 388 commercial and 14,993
residential accounts served.
SCOPE OF WORK:
The following tasks shall be completed:
A. Review the Diamond Bar Municipal Code and hauler contracts.
B. Conduct on-site reviews of all of its current waste haulers' records
relating to the services provided under the contract, including but not
limited to, financial records, route maps, customer lists, billing records,
weight tickets, maps, AB 939 records, and customer complaints for the
period of August 2000 to December 2004.
C. Complete a final report with findings and recommendations especially if
there is identification of any discrepancies or inaccuracies of the records
and reports made to the City.
D. Recommend any program changes regarding the assessment of fees
and the permitting of haulers.
E. Review, and if necessary, revise the City's "Monthly Recycling Progress
Report" form.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR'S RESPONSIBILITIES:
List of items the City will provide to the proposing firm in order to assist them with
the project:
A. Chapter 8.16, Solid Waste, Recyclable and Compostable Materials
Collection of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code
B. Agreements between solid waste haulers and City.
C. City of Diamond Bar's most recent AB939 Annual Report to the California
Integrated Waste Management Board.
D. Listing of all current waste haulers and the number of accounts served.
E. Monthly Reports for the two (2) commercial/residential waste haulers.
F. Other mutually agreed upon items that may be necessary to facilitate the
project.
PROPOSAL FORMAT:
In order to assist our panel in making a selection, the City requires that all
consultants adhere to the response format outlined in this section. Firms failing to
meet this requirement will be evaluated negatively. Responses shall be simply
prepared, brief and to the point. Responses to this Request for Proposal shall be
prepared in a two -envelope format and include the following material in the order
so designated:
1. Cover/transmittal letter indicating interest in and understanding of this RFP
and its requirements (e.g., summarize the proposal).
2. General information about the firm(s) which comprise the Project Team.
State the names and phone numbers of the project team who will be
involved in this project, including the sub consultants (if any) that will be
utilized. Include the responsibilities of each team member in the project
and their qualifications. Resumes may be included.
3. Five (5) references including company's name, contact person, address,
term of project, and telephone numbers with explanations of similar/related
projects. Emphasis should be placed on experience performing similar
work for other municipalities/governmental agencies.
4. A written plan of action in completing the Scope of Work with an estimated
schedule of completion per task.
5. A staffing chart indicating the estimated number of staff hours required, by
job description or title, for each task of the scope of work.
6. Twisting and description of previous and/or ongoing related
experience/projects in auditing City refuse collection firms. Must indicate
the best approach selected and why such method(s) was/were used. Using
such method(s), clearly provide explanation of results, relevant findings and
recommendations, especially if discrepancies and inaccuracies were
identified as a result of the audit.
7. The consultant must include in their proposal a written statement
acknowledging they can provide all the insurance required in the Insurance
Requirements section referenced in the attached sample Agreement.
8. A total fee for the project shall be provided in a separate sealed envelope
marked "Fee Proposal — City of Diamond Bar Financial Audit of Commercial
and Residential Waste Haulers." The fee proposal shall be prepared as a
not -to -exceed lump -sum (including costs for supplies and materials that are
required to complete the scope of work) with additional tasks listed on an
hourly rate basis.
SELECTION CRITERIAIBASIS OF PROPOSAL EVALUATION:
The following is a list of criteria that will be used to evaluate and select the
consultants. Please note that this criteria is in no particular order, any one item
may or may not be weighed more than another.
• Demonstrated record of success by the firm in performing this type of service.
• Relevant experience and qualifications of individual team members assigned to
the project.
• Understanding of project as demonstrated by the thoroughness of the
proposal.
• References from clients for whom similar work was performed.
• Depth of staff available to perform services.
• Timeliness of the proposed project schedule.
• Ability to perform all of the services without having to resort to subcontracting.
• The resources and fee required to perform the requested services.
• Correlation of proposed costs to actual work required by City.
• The consultant's comments on the Consulting Services Agreement.
• The City reserves the right to enter into a contract with the proposer who is
determined by the City to be best suited and qualified to perform the work.
Please note that the responses to this RI=P are subject to the following conditions:
Acceptance of Terms
Submission of a proposal shall constitute acknowledgment and acceptance of all
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in the RFP unless otherwise expressly
stated in the proposal.
Right of Rejection by the City
Not withstanding any other provisions of this RFP, the City reserves the right to
reject any and all proposals and to waive any informality in a proposal. All
proposals submitted to the City in response to this RFP shall become the property
of the City.
Financial Resoonsibilit
The consultant understands and agrees that the City shall have no financial
responsibility for any costs incurred by the consultant in responding to this RFP.
Proposers are entirely responsible for the costs incurred in preparing and
submitting their proposals.
Award of Contract
The selected firm shall be required to enter into a written contract with the City of
Diamond Bar. This RFP and the proposal, or any part thereof, will be incorporated
into and made a part of the final contract; however, the City reserves the right to
further negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract with the selected
consultant. The contract will, in any event, include a maximum "fixed cost" to the
City of Diamond Bar
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:
The consultant shall provide Certificate of Insurance evidencing minimum
coverage of $1,000,000 in Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile
Liability Coverage and Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no
less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California and satisfactory to the
City. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by
the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
DISCRETION AND LIABILITY WAIVER:
The City reserves the right to reject any/all proposals or to request and obtain
supplementary information as may be necessary for City staff to analyze the
proposals pursuant to the consultant selection criteria contained herein.
The City may require consultants to participate in additional negotiations and
meetings before the ultimate selection of a consultant team is made, These
meetings could encompass revisions of the submittal criteria in response to the
nature and scope of the initial proposals.
The consultant, by submitting a response to this RFP, waives all rights to protest
or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this RFP and the
awards of such. The City may choose to interview one or more of the firms
responding to this RFP.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Any conflict of interest by the consultant shall be disclosed immediately. Failure to
do so shall result in immediate termination of the contract. If terminated for conflict
of interest pursuant to this provision, the consultant shall return to the City all
4
information provided by the City including all working drafts and documents
prepared for the City and ail data gathered for the project. The consultant shall
compensate and indemnify the City for any and all damages and losses the City
suffers proximately caused by the consultant's conflict of interest. In addition, the
consultant is prohibited from disseminating any verbal information regarding the
project to anyone else terminated.
AGREEMENT:
Attachment A is a copy of the City's professional services agreement. A statement
MUST be made in the proposal stating that all terms and conditions are
acceptable.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
The agreement shall be signed by the successful consultant and returned within
ten (10) days, not including Sundays and legal holidays, after the City has
provided written notice that the contract has been awarded. Failure to execute an
agreement and insurance documents as provided herein shall be just cause, at
City option, for annulment of the contract award.
Should the successful consultant decline to execute a contract, City Council has
the option to either reject all proposals and call for new proposals or accept one of
the other proposals.
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND DIRECTIONS FOR DELIVERY:
• Proposals must be submitted on 8 % inch by 11 inch paper.
• Submit five (5) copies of the proposal in one envelope,
• Submit 5 copies of the Fee Proposal in a separate envelope.
• The proposal shall be signed by an official authorized to bind the company
and shall contain a statement indicating that the proposal is valid for ninety
(90) days. You will be notified before the end of the 90 -day period of the
City's decision regarding the status of your proposal.
• All proposals and accompanying collateral materials become the sole
property of the City of Diamond Bar and may not be reproduced without the
permission of the City.
• Facsimile or electronic mail submittals will not be accepted.
Copies of the proposals shall be delivered in a "sealed fashion" no later than 5:00
p.m. on Thursday, March 3, 2005 at the following location: City of Diamond Bar,
Public Works Department, 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
Consultants wishing to mail proposals in a "sealed fashion" shall address same to
the City of Diamond Bar, Public Works Department, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(Attention: David G. Liu). Please note: Proposals must be marked on the outside
of the envelope, "City of Diamond Bar Comprehensive Audit of Commercial
and Residential Waste Haulers Proposal."
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Javier R. Peraza, Management
Analyst, at (909) 839-7038.
Sincerely,
D vid G. Liu, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Cc. Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
Jim DeStefano, Assistant City Manager
6
FXNTRTT R
SCOPE OF SERVICES
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The City of Diamond Bar entered into ten-year contracts for residential and
commercial solid waste collection in 2000 with Waste Management, Inc. and
Valley Vista Services, respectively. The City is approximately half -way through
the 10 -year term of the contracts and desires to perform compliance reviews of
the performance of both contractors. The specific study objectives are to:
1. Review and evaluate the contractors' handling of customer complaints;
2. Verify the accuracy of customer billing;
3. Verify the accuracy of AB 939 administrative fee remittances; and,
4. Review and evaluate the City's "Monthly Recycling Progress Report."
Additionally, if requested by the City, we will profile the contract terms and
conditions of the City's existing residential and commercial agreements against
those contained in a state-of-the-art solid waste agreement (Optional Task).
APPROACH
HF&H will use a systematic approach to achieve the City's goals for this study.
Through reviewing the City's municipal code and the solid waste contracts, we
will develop an understanding of the City's residential and commercial solid
waste programs, contract terms and contractor requirements. HF&H will
identify and develop a thorough understanding of:
specific contract requirements related to contractor documentation of and
resolution of customer complaints;
• contractors' billing methodology and documentation,
contractors' methodology and documentation of their calculation of the AB
939 fees due and paid to the City.
Contractor participation and willingness to provide access to necessary financial
and operating documents is implicit in the completion of this study.
4/21/2005 1 -1 City of Diamond Bar
Objective 1: Review and Evaluate the Contractors' Handling of Customer
Complaints
The City has received complaints from customers/ residents arising from the
provision of service by the haulers. Examples of complaints include noise in the
morning from refuse trucks, and from the refuse trucks "doubling back" though
neighborhoods after collection.
In order to evaluate customer complaints and contractor resolutions, it will be
necessary to obtain the customer complaint and resolution documentation from
the contractors. We will request access to the customer complaint logs and
documentation of each contractor's complaint resolution for the year ended
December 31, 2004. We will review and evaluate a sample of complaints, looking
at the number and type of complaints, and the existence of multiple complaints.
We will inquire about repetitive complaints, to determine the root cause of the
complaint(s). The root causes may include routing issues, with drivers
beginning routes too early in the morning, inexperienced drivers, trucks
exceeding allowable noise levels, etc. We will obtain and review the contractors'
documentation of the resolution of the customer complaints and evaluate the
contractors' response to and resolution of customer complaints.
Objective 2: Verify the Accuracy of Customer Billing
The City would like to evaluate the performance of the contractors in billing
residential and commercial customers.
For residential billing, we will scan the billing reports for two months, looking
for customers with billings that do not correspond with the approved City rates.
We will inquire about residential accounts with rates other than the approved
rates.
For commercial billing, we will request a customer account listing for City of
Diamond Bar customers. We will select a sample of customers from the
customer list, determine the service level based on billing records and compare
the amount billed to the City -approved rates for a recent month, and document
any differences.
We will also perform an analysis to evaluate the overall billings. We will obtain
or prepare a schedule of monthly billings for 2004 for each of the contractors. We
will review the monthly billings, observe the month-to-month billing trends, and
inquire about any unusual variations.
4/21/2005 1 - 2 City of Diamond Bar
We will request a history of transactions during calendar year 2004 that involved
credits or charges related to prior period billing accuracies. We will summarize
the number and nature of these transactions.
Objective 3: Verffy the Accuracy of AB 939 Administrative Fee Remittances
The City implemented an AB 939 administrative fee in order to recover its costs
of implementing recycling programs to meet the state's diversion goals.
We will obtain copies of the contractors' AB 939 administrative fee remittances,
agree data to supporting financial documents and verify the accuracy of the fee
calculations.
Objective 4: Review and Evaluate the Ci 's "Monthly Recycling Progress
Report"
We will review and evaluate the City's "Monthly Recycling Progress Report."
We will determine through interviews of City staff that use the monthly report
whether the existing format provides the information required to monitor the
contractor's performance and manage the City's AB 939 compliance efforts.
We will revise the form based on the City's needs and our knowledge of solid
waste reporting standards in the industry.
Optional Task: Profile the Contract Terms and Conditions of the Ci 's
Existing Residential and Commercial Agreements against those Contained in a
State -of -the -Art Solid Waste Agreement.
We will profile the City's existing services and contract terms against those
contained in a state-of-the-art franchise agreement, including residential services,
commercial services, collection from city facilities, special services (e.g. HHW
collection, e -waste collection, city -sponsored events collection, neighborhood
cleanups, etc.), rate adjustment provisions, performance standards,
indemnifications, insurance limits, and other key business terms and conditions.
(Note: this is an optional study objective supported by Optional Task 8).
PROJECT TASKS
The following tasks describe the steps we will take, and issues we will consider,
in reviewing the solid waste contractors' contract compliance.
Task 1: Initiate Stud
We will prepare for and conduct one kick-off meeting with City staff to confirm
4/21/2005 1-3 City of Diamond Bar
the objectives, scope and approach, and schedule for the study. We will also
prepare for and conduct one meeting with each of the contractors and City staff
to discuss the study objectives and expected contractor participation.
Task 2: Review Customer Complaints and Contractor Resolution
In order to review and evaluate the contractors' handling of customer complaints
and subsequent resolution, we will:
• Obtain access to each of the contractors' documentation of customer
complaints and the related complaint resolution;
• Review and evaluate a sample of complaints, examining the type and number
of complaints, the existence of multiple complaints for the same issue and the
related resolution of complaints received;
• Inquire about repetitive complaints to determine the root cause of such
complaints; and,
• Review the contractors' documentation of the resolution of complaints and
evaluate the contractors' response to and resolution of the customer
complaints.
Task 3: Verify that the Contractors are Accurately Billing Customers
To verify that the contractors are accurately billing customers, in accordance with
City -approved rates, we will:
• Request and review a customer account listing that reflects the customer's
name, address, service level and billing rates;
• Scan two months of residential billings looking for rates other than the City -
approved residential rates and inquire about any unusual differences;
• Select a sample of commercial customers for testing;
• Agree each sample commercial customer's billing rate to the City -approved
rate schedule for a recent month;
• Obtain or prepare a schedule of monthly billings for 2004 for residential and
commercial customers, observe the month-to-month trends and inquire about
any unusual variations; and,
• Request and review a history of transactions for 2004 for credits or charges
related to prior period billing inaccuracies, and summarize the nature and
number of these transactions.
The above testing of the accuracy of customer billings will be based on the
contractors' customer service -level data and invoices compared to the City's
4/21/2005 1-4 City of Diamond Bar
approved rate schedules. This task does not include verification of reported
service levels by visual confirmation in the field.
We will also review the language contained in the City's franchise agreement
regarding procedures for crediting/ debiting customer accounts for past
over/under charges, and provide recommendations regarding alternative
methods for handling these situations.
Task 4: Verify the Accuracy of AB 939 Administrative Fee, Remittances
To verify the accuracy of AB 939 administrative fee remittances, we will:
• Obtain copies of the periodic reports submitted to the City supporting the
computation of the AB 939 administrative fees remitted,
• Agree reported data to the contractors' internal financial and/or operational
reports and documents; and,
• Recalculate the AB 939 administrative fees due and compare to the fee
remitted.
Task 5: Review and Evaluate the Ci 's "Monthly Recycling Progress Report"
In order to review and evaluate the City's "Monthly Recycling Progress Report",
we will:
• Interview City staff that use the monthly report to determine if:
o The report provides the data they require;
o The data is in a useable form or do they have to manipulate the data
before it can be used;
a There is data that could be used that is not provided on the form; and,
o They have any suggestions or recommendations for improving the report.
• Prepare a revised reporting form, if needed.
Task 5: Prepare Report and Attend Meeting to Answer Questions about Report
To accomplish this task, we will:
• Prepare a draft report for comment by City staff, including separate exhibits
or appendices presenting the findings for each contractor for the contractors'
review and comment;
• Prepare and submit the final report to the City after reviewing City and
Contractor written comments; and,
4/21/2005 1 - 5 City of Diamond Bar
Attend one meeting with City officials to answer questions about the report
findings.
Task 7: Manage Project
We will administer the project, conduct internal quality reviews, and prepare the
workpapers at the conclusion of the project.
Task 8: Profile Contract Terms and Conditions (Optional Task)
We will profile the City's existing services and contract terms against those
contained in a state-of--the-art franchise agreement by:
Reviewing and summarizing key terms in the City's existing residential and
commercial solid waste agreements; and,
• Summarizing alternative terms and conditions based on those obtained in a
sample of other cities in the counties of Los Angeles and Orange.
The work product from this task will be a three column matrix summarizing the
key service categories and contract conditions in column 1, the City's existing
services and contract terms in column 2, and alternative services and contract
terms in column 3 recommended for consideration by the City of Diamond Bar,
CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
It is the City's responsibility to ensure cooperation by the two solid waste
contractors. Additionally, the City shall be responsible for promptly providing
the background information listed in the Request for Proposal, copies of the
monthly or quarterly reports submitted by the contractors and supporting
documentation for fee remittances.
4/21/2005 1-6 City of Diamond Bar
PROJECT COSTS AND WORKPLAN
We will perform the scope of work based on time and materials. The estimated
cost to perform the scope of work, excluding optional Task 8, is 35,300, as shown
in the workplan on the following page. If optional Task 8 is included for $10,010,
then the total cost would be $45,310.
The fee estimate assumes that we will meet with City staff a maximum of two
times: once for the kick-off meeting initiating the project, and once to review the
project findings prior to preparation of the report. We will prepare one draft
report and the final report. We have budgeted to attend one meeting with City
officials to answer questions about the report. We have not budgeted to prepare
a separate presentation -style document to present the study findings at a
meeting.
We will bill you once per month based on the number of hours worked
multiplied by our hourly billing rates, plus expenses incurred. Payment is due
within 30 days of invoicing. Hourly rates for our consultants are as follows:
Staff Level
Senior Vice President
Senior Manager
Senior Associate
Associate
Assistant
Out of pocket expenses will be billed as follows:
Mileage:
In-house document reproduction
(over 15 pages/run)
Public conveyances and parking
Postage/ document couriers/ overnight mail
All other out of pocket expenses
*Or as adjusted by the IRS for mileage allowance
Hourly
$220
$185
$175
$125
$95
$0.405 per mile*
$0.15 per page
Actual
Actual
Actual
4/21/2005 2-1 City of Diamond Bar
TASK DESCRIV7[ON
Senior:
St.
Assistant
Total
1 Initiate Study
As spcists
,
Flouts
Subtotal: Task 1 Fees
$
6
1,320
$
8
1,400
$
-
-
$
14
2,720
2 Review of Customer Complaints and
Contractor Resolution
4
16
40
60
Subtotal: Task 2 Fees
$
880
$
2,800
$
3,800
$
7,480
3 Verity that the Contractors are
Accurately Billing Customers
6
30
Subtotal; Task 3 Fees
$
1,320
$
5,250
$
36
3,420
$
72
9,990
4 Verify the Accuracy of AS 939
Administrative Fee Remittances
2
16
16
Subtotal: Task 4 Fees
$
440
$
2,800
$
1,520
$
34
4,760
5 Review and Evaluate the City's Monthly
Recycling Progress Report
1
8
2
Subtotal: Task 5 Fees
$
220
$
1,400
$
190
$
11
1,810
6 Prepare Report & Attend Meeting
Subtotal: Task 6 Fees
$
14
3,080 $
20
3,500 $
8
760
$
42
7,340
7 Manage Project
Subtotal: Task 7 Fees
$
1
220 $
2
350 $
1
95 $
4
665
Total Hours
34
100
103
237
Hourly Rate
$
220 $
175 $
95
Fees
Expenses
$
7,480 $
17,500 $
9,785 $
34,765
Total Costs (excluding optional task 8)
$
535
$
35,300
8 Profile Contract Terms (Optional)
$
16 $
36 $
Subtotal: Task 8 Fees
$
3,520 $
6,300 $
2
190 $
54
10,010
Total Costs Including Optional Task 8
$
45,310
4/21/2005
2-2
City of Diamond Bar
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Scope of Work Comparison
Task Description
1 Initiate Study
2 Review of Customer Complaints
3 Verify Accuracy of Contractor Billing
4 Verify Accuracy of AB 939 Administrative Fee Remittances
5 Review & Evaluate the Monthly Recycling Progress Report
6 Prepare Report
7 Manage Project
ATTACHMENT 2
Included in Scove of Work?
H.F. & H.
B.V.A.*
$ 2,720
N/A
$ 7,480
YES
$ 9,990
YES
$ 4,760
YES
$ 1,810
YES
$ 7,340
YES
$ 665
N/A
EXPENSES $ 535 N/A
TOTAL FEES AND EXPENSES $ 35,300 $ 31,459
Task Description - Optional Included in Scope of Work?
H.F. & H. B.V.A.
S Profile Contract Terms (i.e. City vs. "State of the Art" Contract Terms) $ 10,010 N/A**
TOTAL FEES AND EXPENSES INCLUDING TASK NO. 8 $ 45,310 $ 31,459
* Fee proposal was submitteed as Not -to -Exceed Lump -Sum
** This task was a direct result of meeting with HF & H only
4/26/2005
Agenda # 6.11
Meeting Date: Ma 3 2004
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
TITLE: Authorize City Manager to Purchase two copiers from Contact Office Solutions in
amount not to exceed $35,000 and appropriate the necessary funds from General
Funds reserves
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to purchase two copiers from
Contact Office Solutions and appropriate $35,000 from General Fund reserves for the purchase of
new two new photocopiers.
Budget/Financial Impact:
This expenditure was not identified in the current budget. However, there are sufficient General Fund
reserves to accommodate this purchase.
After purchasing the new copiers, it is anticipated the City will save approximately $11,000 per year in
support costs.
The existing copiers will be become surplus property and disposed of at auction. The proceeds of the
auction sale will be returned to the City. However, we have been advised by multiple sources that
these machines have zero trade-in or resale value so the income from the sale will most likely be
negligible.
Background:
In 1998 the City purchased two, 8 year old Xerox 5100 high volume copiers. At that time Xerox
agreed to provide support and maintenance on the machines for the next 7 years. Over most of the
past 7 years these machines have served faithfully, however over the last 12 months the copiers
have required more service than usual which resulted in significant `but of service" time.
With the advanced age of the machines (nearly 15 years old), the increased service requirements,
and the expiration of Xerox service contract, City staff recognized the need for new copiers. The
Information Systems Department met with key City staff members and a number of vendors to
analyze and review our current business processes and future needs.
Discussion:
After reviewing different machines from Xerox, Sharp, Panasonic and Ricoh, it was determined that
the replacement machines that best meet the City's current and future needs are manufactured by
Ricoh. After reviewing equipment costs and checking customer service references, it was
determined that Contact Office Solutions would be the best vendor. The two machines proposed for
purchase are a Ricoh, model 2075SP 75 ppm (page per minute) Black and White and a Ricoh model
2228C 20 ppm Color printer. Staff is currently conducting a 30 day demo/trail of these two machines.
If the demonstrations are successful, staff will purchase these machines in the next few weeks.
Since the total cost exceeds the City Manager's purchasing authority, the City Council must authorize
the purchase of the copiers. By authorizing the City Manager to purchase the copiers, we can
expedite the replacement of the two outdated copiers.
PREP RED BY:
dnZDesforge , rector information Systems Dave Doyle, ssis t ty Manager
Agenda 6.12 _
Meeting Date: May 3, 2005
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage
TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -XX ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER
OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD PURPOSES FROM DIAMOND HILLS
RANCH MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF HIGHCREST DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept and authorize the Director of Public Works to sign the Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This action has no financial impact on the City.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Highcrest Drive terminates approximately 85' northeast of the wrought iron fence and
gate separating Skyline Drive, a private road within the gated community of Diamond
Hills Estates as shown on the attached aerial maps. As a result, a portion of the private
road, the cul-de-sac of Skyline Drive, is directly connected to a publicly maintained
roadway, Highcrest Drive. In order to maintain all of Highcrest Drive, portions of
roadway and sidewalk belonging to the gated community of Diamond Hills Estates
(Skyline Drive) outside of the gates must be dedicated to the City. In addition to
improving the consistency of maintenance along Highcrest Drive, this dedication will
also enable law enforcement officers to patrol the dedicated portion of the road.
Diamond Hills Ranch Maintenance Corporation has prepared the attached Legal
Description, Exhibit A and Skyline Drive dedication map, Exhibit B, which have been
reviewed by staff. The documents conform to the City standards and staff recommends
Council to accept this offer of dedication. The property owner has executed the
attached Irrevocable Offer for the City's approval and acceptance.
PREPARED BY:
Kimberly Molina, Assistant Engineer
REVIEWED BY:
- z�za
D vid klil
Director of Public Works
James DeStefano
Assistant City Manager
Attachments: Aerial Map A & B
Resolution No. 2005 -XX
Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Purposes
MAP A_.Cuvr rxTu Y%"YXTT
MAP B-SKYLINE DRIVE IRRF,VOC A Rr .F nFrrn rnu . r.rT,-.,.T
RESOLUTION 2005 -XX
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD
PURPOSES.
A. RECITALS:
(i) WHEREAS, Diamond Hills Ranch Maintenance Corporation is the owner
of the property located at the terminus of Highcrest Drive and has offered the City of
Diamond Bar a dedication for such portions of property more particularly described in
Exhibits A and B of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Purposes attached
hereto;
(ii) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed, approved and recommends
acceptance of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Purposes; and
(iii) WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the acceptance of this offer and the
adoption of this resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION:
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find that
all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby accepts
the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Purposes attached hereto from Diamond
Hills Ranch Maintenance Corporation and consents to recordation of this offer of
dedication.
Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar is hereby authorized and
directed to cause the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Purposes to be recorded
on behalf of the City in the Office of the County Recorder and to execute any and all
other documents as may be necessary or convenient to effect the recordation, and to
certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of May, 2005.
Wen Chang, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda C. Lowry, City Clerk
I, LINDA C. LOWRY, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 3rd day of May, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LINDA C. LOWRY, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
PLEASE COMPLETE INFORMATION
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Office of the City Clerk
AND WHEN RECORDE=D MAIL TO:
City of Diamond Bar
21825 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 (THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION — ROAD PURPOSES
City of Diamond Bar
County of Los Angeles, State of California
The undersigned, being the present title owner of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
IRREVOLCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION to the City of Diamond Bar, a California Municipal Corporation, and its
successors or assigns of a permanent easement and right-of-way for street and highway purposes, and incidents and
appurtenances thereto over, under, along and across the real property situated in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los
Angeles, State of California more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and as shown in Exhibit "B", both attached hereto
It is understood and agreed that the City of Diamond Bar and its successors and assigns shall incur no liability with
respect to such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any
improvements thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by resolution of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar or its authorized designee. The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs,
successors, assign rsonal representative of the respective parties hereto
IN W IT�NESS W�ERFOF, thes presents have executed this instrument this 21 day of
its: t—
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by this instrument to the City of Diamond Bar, a California
Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the city of Diamond Bar
Date:
By: T
Its:
REQ c�co
s Corr�r�WM s 1413479
t Notal Pubic - CoNaroo
os Aroelim County
MV LCOMM EX13i1W Mm l Z7
NOTE: NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FOR ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE ATTACHED
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ( ss.
On A__ � _0 G before me,
Dale and isle o10 car e. '
9.� "Jane Doa, Notary Pu61il
personally appeared ! ��ro
REIN O
Co70*obn• 141161p19
No coy t� - C�ba�a
it Angoas Carly
�MCa TMEg ea a
C personally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entit on behalf of which the person(s)
acted, xe ted the i:071,
ent.
WIT�I S my hand aial seal.
Signature o! Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
Individual
Corporate Officer — Title(s); Top of th,il here
E Partner — - Limited I _ General
G Attorney -in -Fact
L Trustee
— Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing;
v^Ct G
®1999 National Notary Assxiaron • 9350 De Soto Ave.. PO 8oe 24112 • Chullwolh, CA 9.313-24f12 • www r '�y..
atcnalrotaryorg Prod. INC 5907 Reorder. Cull oil -Free 1-800876.6827
EXHIL-31T Pi
LEGAL DESCIRMT10N
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "G", "K" AND "M" OF TRACT NO. 52267, IN THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON MARCH
13, 2000 IN BOOK 1245, PAGES 57 THROUGH 72, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, SAID PORTION
OF LOT "G" BEING DESCRIBED AS PARCEL"A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LL -00-006 IN
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED AUGUST 3, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 01-
1401902 IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER, BEING MORE PARTICULARILY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.-
BEGINNING
OLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT "M"; 'THENCE ALONG
THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT "M" THE FOLOWING 4 COURSES: SOUTH
29048'03" EAST, 13.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59°51'14" WEST, 48.03 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 29°33'23" EAST, 41.62 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 64°33'00" WEST, 19.00 FEET TO
THE EASTERL Y BOUiNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID
EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 02°20'00" EAST, 11.36 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF
A NON -TANGENT 45.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, RADIAL
LINE_ TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 51'19'51" EAST; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY
BOUNDARY LINE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71017'54", A DISTANCE OF 56.00 FEET TO THE:. BEGINNING OF A
REVERSE 5.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
POINT BEARS NORTH 'I9°58'03"EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45020'03", A DISTANCE OF 4.35 FELT TO THE
NORTHER LY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT "G°; TFiLNCE. ALONG SAID NOR-HERLY
BOUNDARY LINT SOUTH 64°38'00" WEST, 8.62 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE NORTH 252.2'00"WEST. 60.00 FE[ T TO THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT "K THENCE" ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE
NORTH 64°38'00" EAST, 8.62 FEE=T TO THE BEGINNING OF A 5.5D FOOT RADIUS CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY: THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE:
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
45°20'03", A DISTANCE OF 4.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 45.00 FOOT
RADIUS CURVE= CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS
PAGE 1 OF 2
Descriplions`J;O1 !Of].doc
NORTH 70°42'03" WEST; THENCE NOPTHEASTLRLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CUF:VE-
I FIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85°02'58", A DISTANCE OF 66.80 FEET 1-0 TFIE
BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 14°20'54" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY .
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°42'54", A
DISTANCE OF 13.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT "K";
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES;
NORTH 64038'00" EAST, 9.21 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°54'59", A DISTANCE OF 36.23 FEET
TO THE. POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 0.166 ACRES MORE OR
LESS.
a LAND So
�Me �1-
C) Q �`�� �o
L.S. 7322
W. AMBLER c ` Rxp.
DAVID
L, S. 7322
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. �*
a �
LL. V, ^,?3;ip1G011Lea�l DFacr,�;i:�nsL101 IOC3.doc
`SCALE
LEGEND
P. o. B.
- MOSF N'LY CORNER LOr '41"
\max• o !
Vmss ��, l� � � •<8'03� �
4
JN3.30
JIG
) 1
C2
007V64 -J8'00 1-
8.62 '
3.79'
J, 0 ' JJ
V64"38'00'E i Y r G T "J9 4
q� 19.00'
lo,,-
!
1 olfIl- --)2
>> rZ=71
\ F'LY LINE PARCEL A� \
�.I
2 \
JJ�1r�L JA N
INOCATES ST RFFT DEDICATION
AREA - 0. 166 ACRES
(LINE DRIVE DF-DICAT70fe'
BAp
CAU! WA
NUMBER_
DFL TA RADIUS LENGTH
j
0,354'59 "
530.00
.6.23
C2
39'4254 "
20.00
13.86
C3
45'20103
5.50
4.35
C4
45'20'03"
5.50
4.35
� T
JWAISAK R , ASSOCYATF_S .SAN D11 GO, INC'_
j
PL4M'IA'G - ENv,NFERING -- SMSNG
10179 HUI MVriCtNS SIRFU - &W OlEGO, CJI .42121
1
(859) 558--4500 - FAX (858) 558-1414
PH ] SHT 0l.DWG(11.]Sy1pr-U6-X005:15:47
Agenda # � 1
Meeting Date: MM?Y!., 2005
CITY COUNCIL
AGEND
A REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager. j
TITLE: RESOLUTION NO.
UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES 5 IS IN THE DETERMINING GENERAL PUBLIC
INTEREST AND ESTABLISHING THE BREA CANYON
ROAD/WASHINGTON STREET UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct a public hearing and approve Resolution No. 2005 -XX.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact for the City of Diamond Bar. The City of Industry will fund
all costs.
BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the proposed Grade Separation Project of Brea Canyon Road the
Cities of Industry and Diamond Bar along with Alameda Corridor East (ACE)
Construction Authority have initiated a program to remove poles, overhead wires and
associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities
for supplying electric, communication or similar services in the area within the Cities of
Industry and Diamond Bar. The affected area within Diamond Bar is located south of
the Union Pacific Metrolink Railroad Tracks along Brea Canyon Road to approximate)
780' south of the intersection with Washington Street and along Washington Street
approximately 420' east of the intersection with Brea Canyon Road (Exhibit A).
DISCUSSION:
Several poles along with all the necessary appurtenances
underground as part of the Grade Separation pProject All thirteepnosed affe ted prto be operty
owners have been notified and invited to the May 3►d Council Meeting. The
underground installation is anticipated to be completed no later than January 1, 2007.
The City of Industry and ACE are taking the lead on the undergrounding of the utilities
and will coordinate the work with both the utility companies involved and the property
owners affected.
In accordance with the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 13.04 Undergrounding of
Utilities, Division 1 provides a procedure for formation of underground utility districts.
The City finds and determines that the following are in the general public interest:
a.) Existing overhead electric or communication facilities presently located within
certain designated areas, or sections thereof, of the City should be removed
and replaced with underground electric or communication facilities; and
b.) Any future or new electric or communication facilities located within certain
designated areas, or sections thereof, of the City should be underground
electric or communication facilities.
This project has the following advantages:
1. Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration
of overhead electric or communication facilities;
2. The designated area, or sections thereof, are extensively used by the general
public and carry a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic;
3. It has great aesthetic value;
4. It does not affect a significant number of property owners.
Upon receiving the public comments tonight, staff recommends the City Council
approval of the resolution to establish the Brea Canyon Road/Washington Street
Underground Utility District.
PREPARED BY:
Kimberly Molina, Assistant Engineer
REVIEWED BY:
Date Prepared: April 28, 2005
Da d 'iu Jim DeStefano
Director of Public Works
Assistant City Manager
Attachments: Resolution 2005 -XX with Exhibit A
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
DETERMINING THAT UNDERGROUNDING, IN THE SPECIFIED AREA, IS IN THE
GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST AND ESTABLISHING THE BREA CANYON
ROAD/WASHINGTON STREET UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT
A. Recitals
0) WHEREAS, Division 1, Chapter 13.04 of the Diamond Bar Municipal
Code establishes a procedure for the creation of underground utility
districts and requires as the initial step in such procedure the holding of a
public hearing to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety, or
welfare required the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated
overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities
for supplying electric, communication, or similar or associated service for
the Brea Canyon Road/Washington Street area of the City of Diamond
Bar, as more particularly described in this Resolution; and
{ii) WHEREAS, a public hearing was called for May 3, 2005 at 7:00 pm at
the South Coast Air Quality Management District Main Auditorium,
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, to ascertain whether the
public necessity, safety, health, or welfare requires the removal of poles,
overhead wires, and associated overhead structures and the underground
installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication,
or similar or associated service on Brea Canyon Road and Washington
Street in the area specified in Exhibit A; and
(iii) WHEREAS, notice of such hearing has been given to all affected
Property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll concerned
in the manner and for the time required by law; and
OV) WHEREAS, notice of such hearing was posted in the manner and for the
time required by law; and
(v) WHEREAS, such hearing has been duly and regularly held, and all
Persons interested have been given an opportunity to be heard.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SEC Tom: Undergrounding, in the specified area, is in the general
Public interest for its health, safety and welfare as:
(a.) such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate as unusually heavy
concentration of overhead electric and communication facilities;
and
(b.) the street or road or right-of-way is extensively used by the general
public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular
traffic.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the project identified in
Exhibit A in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirement
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as
amended, pursuant to Section 15302 (d) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 3: The area defined by Exhibit A shall constitute and be known as the Brea
Canyon Road/Washington Street Underground Utility District.
SECTION 4: The following exceptions are incorporated in the Brea
Canyon Road/Washington Street Underground Utility District:
(a.) Poles and pedestals for fire alarm boxes, street lights, traffic signals
and the like installed and maintained by or for the City.
(b) Airvents, meters, cabinets containing electronic devices, and cabinets
for connection points determined by the Director of Public Works to
be necessary for service continuity, and not feasible for underground
location, subject to approval by the Director as to location and
unobtrusiveness.
(c.) Telecommunication antennae and supporting structures used for
communication service or reception for a community
telecommunication antenna system subject to approval of the City
Council as to location and unobtrusiveness.
(d.) Temporary overhead facilities necessary for emergency services for
less than ten (10) days which period may be extended by the Director
of Public Works for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days and
which may be extended by City Council for an unlimited period.
(e.) Temporary overhead wires and supporting poles approved by the
Director of Public Works and erected to facilitate construction of a
building or other structures, for a period of not more then one hundred
eighty (180) days.
SECTION 6. The City Council resolves that all poles, overhead wires and
associated overhead structures shall be removed and underground
istrict within the following
installations made in said underground utility d
times:
(a.) Underground installation and reconnections not later than January 1,
2007;
(b.) Removal of poles, overhead wires and other associated structures not
later than January 1, 2007;
SECTION 7. The City Cleric shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and, within ten (10) days after the adoption of this Resolution shall mail a
copy of this Resolution to affected property owners as such are shown on
the last equalized assessment roll and to the affected utilities.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of May, 2005.
ATTEST: Wen Chang, Mayor
Linda C. Lowry, City -Clerk
I, LINDA C. LOWRY, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 3d day of May 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LINDA C. LOWRY, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
UNDERGROUND DISTRICT F sP I
COUNTY OF ARGFCES �`
BOUNDARY
UNDERGRO' ND DISTRICT
BOUNDARYCD
BOUNDARY CITY OF INDUSTRY
60� / / I o
Q I �
a� r
S
0-
160'
r
30'
Liz
r
o
.' SCE POLE NO. 1863265E
r
r
r
/ pp
r
LYCOMING
ST.
r7
z
a
> NORTHAMPTON ST, _
DIAMOND BAR
-- UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT
Agenda # 7.2 a & b
Meeting Date: May 3 2005
CITY COUNCIL P AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of. the City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager,�i��:�°f
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING
BUSINESS REGISTRATION AND AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR
MUNICIPAL CODE AND A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR BUSINESS REGISTRATION AND BUSINESS
REGISTRATION RENEWAL AND AMENDING THE EXISTING FEE
SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing and approve the first reading of Ordinance
No. (2005) and adopt City Council Resolution No. 2005 -
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City has purchased Pentamation's Miscellaneous Receivables which is a billing system.
According to the Finance Department, this billing system may be sufficiently adaptable for the
proposed Business Registration Program. Since the finance system is not fully implemented,
it is not known if the registration requirements will be compatible. This avenue will be
explored prior to considering the purchase of specific software which has been estimated to
cost $25,000.00.
Administering the Business Registration Program is not a full cost recovery program. F
associated with business licensing, regulatory business certificates and business registraees
were discussed at City Council study sessions. To administer a Business Registration tion
Program, staff estimated the initial fee at $75.00 and a renewal fee at $42.50. The fees were
based on staff time needed to review and approve a business registration application and
issue a certificate. Council asked staff to re-examine the fees and at a subsequent study
session, staff presented a $30.00 initial fee (base on 20 minutes of time or the cost of a
Zoning Clearance) and an annual renewal fee of $10.00. However, to encourage businesses
to open in the City and for economic development purposes, the Council consensus was to
charge $10.00 for each new business registration and annual renewal fee of $10.00.
BACKGROUND:
Upon incorporation in 1989, the City adopted the Los Angeles County Code and entered into
a General Services Agreement with the County to provide the City, its residences and
business community with various municipal services. A contract service that is still in place is
to administer the City's business license function.
The City Council has expressed an interest in evaluating the possibility of transferring the
business licensing function from Los Angeles County to an "In House" city service. As a
result, City Council has conducted several study sessions regarding this matter.
DI'SCUSSI'ON:
The study session discussions have centered on three types of business license programs
that could be administered "in House." These programs are summarized as follows:
• Business Registration
The business registration program will document the business activity and ensure that
a business establishment is operating within the correct zoning district and in
accordance with applicable Municipal Codes. Business registration may be used in
conjunction with the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. The business registration
process will assist the City in understanding the types of businesses within the
community. The information obtained from business registrations will be used to track
approximately 1,500 business that exist in the City by business types, aid in the proper
receipt of sales taxes from the State, provide useful information for economic
development programs, and assist public safety agencies.
• Regulatory License Fee
In addition to purposes listed above for the Business Registration Program, a
regulatory license program allows the City to regulate the proposed business use
and/or business operator. This program necessitates scrutiny by the Building and
Safety Division, Fire Department, Health Department, Planning Division and/or
Sheriff's Department. Field inspections and criminal background investigations may
be required. Should a business create special land use or law enforcement problems
such as noise, traffic, criminal behavior, etc., the City would be able to investigate and
cause the business in question to operate in a manner that will not negatively impact
the adjacent businesses or residents. As a result, a regulatory license program
necessitates fees that are higher than those established for business registration.
Fees required for a regulatory business license would reimburse the City for the cost
to investigate the proposed business and to operate the City program. Fees
associated with a regulatory license program do not require voter approval.
• Business License Tax
In addition to the purposes listed for business registration and regulatory license, a
business license tax may be imposed upon a business for the privilege of conducting
business within the City. This type of revenue generating program is most often based
upon gross receipts or levied at a flat rate. At times, it is based upon the quantity of
goods produced, or the number of vehicles, or number of employees in the business
or some other combination of factors. Cities may levy this type of business license tax
for either regulatory or revenue raising purposes. A business license fee is considered
a tax pursuant to Proposition 218. A tax requires voter approval pursuant to
Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" that was approved by the voters on
November 5, 1996 and became effective July 1, 1997.
At the January 18, 2005 study session, the City Council directed staff to prepare an
ordinance that would implement an "In House" Business Registration Program. This would
require businesses including home based businesses to register with the City and renew their
registration annually. It would also require registration upon change of ownership or
relocation within the City. Furthermore, existing businesses not already registered would be
required to do so. This type of registration would require the business owner to complete a
simple application form furnishing basic information about their business. For new
businesses, this would allow the Planning Division to verify zoning compliance.
The "In House" Business Registration Program will be utilized in conjunction with Los
Angeles County's General Services Agreement which includes administering the business
license function for Diamond Bar. The Business Registration Program is expected to begin
on July 1, 2005.
BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES
If the City Council adopts an ordinance establishing a Business Registration Program, the
existing fee schedule will need to be amended. A resolution amending the City's existing fee
schedule is attached for Council's review. The Council may adopt or modify the resolution. If
the resolution is adopted, it will be effective July 1, 2005.
The City Council study session discussions regarding an "In House" business licensing
function also included fees. Fees were discussed related to administering either a Business
Registration Program or a Regulatory License Program. Staff presented several fee
scenarios that would off -set the costs of administering these types of programs. Ultimately,
the Council wanted to keep fees at a minimum to market the City as business friendly. As a
result, Council consensus was to charge $10.00 for each new business registration and
annual renewal fee of $10.00.
NOTICE TO THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY
If the ordinance is adopted, the City will notify the business community of the Business
Registration Program. Notification could be accomplished through sources such as the City's
web site, Diamond City News, Windmill, DBTV, Weekly News, local newspapers and the
Chamber of Commerce.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopting a Business Registration Program does not require public notice. However, public
notice is required to adopt or amend fees. Therefore and pursuant to Government Code
Sections 66018 and 6062a., notice for amending the City's fee schedule was published in the
Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on April 22, 2005. Pursuant to
Planning and Zoning Law Government Code Section 65091 (a) (3), if the number of property
owners to whom a public hearing notice would be mailed is greater than 1000, a local agency
may provide notice by placing a display advertisement 1/8 page in one newspaper of general
circulation. The City placed a 1/8 page display in the above-mentioned newspapers of
general circulation ten days prior to the public hearing date.
PREPARED BY:
iln J. Lun , As ciat lanner
REVIE D BY
Nancy Fo Plannin Manager
James DeStefano, Assistant City Manager
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. XX (2005);
2. City Council Resolution No. 2005 - ; and
3. January 18, 2005 City Council Study Session Minutes pertaining to business licensing.
Cl
ORDINANCE NO. (2005)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING BUSINESS
REGISTRATION AND AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Title 5 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new
Chapter 5.200 to read as follows:
Chapter 5.200. Business Registration
Division 1. General Regulations
Section 5.200.010. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this title, shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Business means any employment avocation, occupation, profession, trade, calling, lawful game,
show, exhibition, event, venture, fund-raising activity, commercial enterprise, company,
corporation, joint enterprise, place of business, partnership or other activity or enterprise engaged
in for gain, profit, benefit, advantage, or livelihood, whether or not a gain, profit, benefit, advantage
or livelihood is earned by such business.
Branch Establishment means a location where a business is conducted in addition to its main or
fixed place of business.
Business Registration means a process provided for in this chapter by which each business owner
having a business or is doing business in the City is required to provide general information to the
City.
Business Registration Certificate means a written statement issued by the City to a business
owner as evidence of registering a business in the City.
City means the city of Diamond Bar.
Home Based Business means a business conducted within a single-family residential dwelling unit
or residential site, employing occupants of the dwelling unit, with the business activity being
subordinate to the residential use of the property.
Person means and includes any business owner, individual, firm, co -partnership, joint venture,
association, corporation, estate, business trust, or any other group or combination acting as a unit.
1
Premises means all lands, structures, places and also the personal property, equipment and
appurtenances connected or used in any business.
Section 5.200.020. Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to establish a regulatory mechanism whereby the City may maintain
accurate record of businesses conducting business in the City, for statistical purposes and to
assist in zoning compliance.
Section 5.200.030. Business Registration and Fee Required.
FO
Business Registration.
1. No person shall conduct any business in the City without first having obtained a
Business Registration Certificate, paid the applicable business registration fee and
complied with any and all applicable provisions of this code.
2. When a business registration fee is imposed upon any business pursuant to this
chapter and such business is conducted at one or more fixed place of business and
one or more branch establishment, the fee shall be computed as if each fixed place
of business and branch establishment are separate and independent.
(a) A separate Business Registration Certificate shall be obtained for each
business location and for each separate type of business at the same
location.
3. A Home Based Business shall be required to obtain a Business Registration
Certificate prior to conducting business within a residential dwelling unit or on
residential property.
4. In any business where a county, state, federal license is required, such license shall
be shown to the City before a Business Registration Certificate is issued.
5. A Business Registration Certificate shall not be issued to a business which requires
Workers' Compensation Insurance until satisfactory proof of having Workers'
Compensation Insurance is provided to the City.
Fee Required.
1. Every person engaging in business in the City shall pay a business registration fee
as prescribed by resolution adopted by the City Council.
2. The business registration fee is not a revenue raising device, but shall bear a
reasonable relationship to the service to be performed by the City and the costs
incurred by the City in reviewing, processing and action upon the application.
3. The City Council shall, from time to time, review the resolution fixing the business
registration fee and shall revoke, modify, adjust, add or determine any amount or
rate of such business registration fee.
2
Section 5.200.040. General Application Procedures.
A. Every person operating a business in the City shall apply to obtain a Business Registration
Certificate. Upon receipt of a completed application and any fee required, the City shall
process the application and issue a Business Registration Certificate. The application may
be reviewed by other City departments or governmental agencies to determine if the
business premises to be occupied meet the requirements of federal, state, and local laws.
B. Contents of Application.
1. Each business registration application shall contain the following:
(a) Business name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Mailing address;
(d) Phone number;
(e) Fax number;
(f) Employer I.D. Number (or Social Security number);
(g) State resale permit;
(h) State employer I.D. number;
(i) State contractors/business and profession license number (if applicable);
(j) Type of business being conducted;
(k) Days and hours of operation:
(1) Start date;
(m) Type of ownership;
(n) Owners or principal officers;
(o) Description of all vehicles and mechanical equipment owned by or under the
control of the business.
(p) Business license number;
(q) Business Registration fee paid;
(r) Health permit number;
(s) Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy number, date and date of
expiration if applicable; and
(t) Such other information as may be required by the application form or
requested by the City for enforcement and administration of this chapter.
Section 5.200.050. Contents of Business Registration Certificate.
A. Upon the payment for business registration, the City shall issue to the applicant a Business
Registration Certificate which shall contain the following:
Type of business;
2. Name of business
3. Business location;
4. Business tax number;
5. Business owner;
6. Expiration date;
7. Amount of fee paid for business registration; and
8 Such other information as deemed necessary by the City.
Section 5.200.060. Annual Renewal of business registration.
A. Business registration fees shall be due and payable annually in advance.
B. Any person applying to renew a business registration shall submit to the City a completed
renewal application and pay the renewal fee. Business Registration Certificates shall be
renewed between January 1 and January 31 of each year.
C. If deemed necessary, the City may establish alternative registration periods for individuals
or businesses. In no instance shall a registration period extend for more than one year or
less than one day,
Section 5.200.070. Refunds.
No business registration fees or penalties collected shall be refundable.
Section 5.200.080. Duplicate Business Registration/Modification to Business Registration/
Transfer of Business Registration,
A. Duplicate Business Registration. Upon filing a statement indicating that a Business
Registration Certificate has been lost of destroyed, and after paying a fee, a duplicate
Business Registration Certificate shall be issued by the City.
B. Modification to Business Registration. Where a Business Registration Certificate is issued
authorizing a person to engage in a business under a particular business name at a
particular location, the Business Registration Certificate may be amended to reflect the
modification after paying the business registration fee.
C. Transfer of Business Registration Certificate. Upon change of ownership, a Business
Registration Certificate is transferable subject to the filing of a new application and paying
the business registration fee.
Section 5.200.090. Business Registration Fee Received by Mail.
Whenever any payment, statement, report or other communication is received after a deadline
prescribed by this chapter, but is received in a sealed envelope with a postmark dated on or
before such deadline, the City may regard such payment, report or other communication as
having been received within the appropriate time frame.
Section 5.200.100. Posting and Keeping Business Registration Certificate.
A. Any person engaging in business at a fixed location or branch establishment in the City
shall keep a Business Registration Certificate posted in a conspicuous place upon the
premises where the business is carried on.
0
B. Any person engaging in business, but not operating at a fixed location or branch
establishment in the City, shall be in possession of a Business Registration Certificate at all
times while on such business in the City.
Section 5.200.110. Authority to Enforce/Entry to Inspect.
A. Authority to Enforce. The City shall have authority to enforce each of the provisions of this
chapter. The Los Angeles County Sheriff Department and other City departments shall
render assistance in the enforcement of this chapter as may be necessary. The City
Attorney is authorized to file a complaint against any persons found in violation of this
chapter.
B. Entry to Inspect. The City, deputy sheriffs, fire inspector, an other City officers empowered
to enforce the provision of this chapter, shall have the power and authority to enter into a
business, free of charge and at any reasonable time, and required to see the Business
Registration Certificate posted in a conspicuous place upon the premises. If the business
does not have a Business Registration Certificate and/or posted Business Registration
Certificate, the business owner is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Section 5.200.120. Penalties for Delinquency/Action to Collect.
A. Penalties for Delinquency. Any person engaging in business in the City who fails to pay
the appropriate business registration fee shall be subject to the following penalties:
1. For failure to pay a business registration fee when due, the City shall double the fee
on the day following the last day of each consecutive thirty day interval following the
due date while the fee remains unpaid.
2. For failure to secure a Business Registration Certificate to engage in business, the
business registration fee shall be due and payable from the first date the person
engaged in the business together with applicable penalties provided in subsection
A. 1. of this section.
B. Action to Collect. Notwithstanding subsection A.1. of this section, should court action be
required to collect any business registration fee and/or penalties, an additional penalty shall
be charged equal to the cost incurred by the City for court action, including attorney fees.
All penalties shall be added to the business registration fee and shall become due and
payable along with the delinquent business registration fee.
Section 5.200.130. Withholding a Business Registration Certificate.
The City shall withhold a Business Registration Certificate to engage in business from any person
when there are pending violations of any City code against such person and/or business applying
for a Business Registration Certificate, or when a debt is owed to the City as a result of a violation
of this Code.
Section 5.200.140. Appeal.
Any person aggrieved by any decision of the City with respect to the issuance or denial of a
Registration Certificate shall have the right to appeal to the City Council by filing an appeal with
5
the City Cleric within ten (10) days of the date of the action being appealed and paying any appeal
fee determined by resolution of the City Council.
Section 5.200.150. Remedies Cumulative.
All remedies prescribed in this chapter shall be cumulative and the use of one or more remedies
by the City shall not prohibit the use of any other remedy for the purpose of enforcing the
provisions of this chapter.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 2005, BY THE CITY
Wen P. Chang, Mayor
I, Linda C. Lowry, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held
on the day of , 2005 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
Linda C. Lowry, City Clerk,
City of Diamond Bar
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
JANUARY 18, 2005
STUDY SESSION: Mayor Chang called the Study Session to order
at 5:23 p.m. in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District/Government Center, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA.
Present: Council Members Herrera, Zirbes, Mayor Pro
Tem O'Connor and Mayor Chang.
Staff Present: Linda Lowry, City Manager; Michael Jenkins,
City Attorney; James DeStefano, Assistant City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant
City Manager and Acting City Clerk; David Liu, Director of Public Works; Bob
Rose, Community Services Director; Ken DesForges, IT Director; Linda
Magnuson, Finance Director; Nancy Fong, Planing Manager; Ann Lungu,
Associate Planner; Sharon Gomez, Senior Management Analyst; April Blakey,
Public Information Manager; and Tommye Cribbins, Executive Asst.
00. Business Licensing:
ACM/DeStefano reviewed prior Council discussions on the matter of Business
Licensing in the City and indicated that staff was recommending that Council
w allow staff to develop appropriate Ordinances and Resolutions to
move the ty
into a Business Registration program with an initial fee of $30, an annual renewal
Of $10.00 and continue with the Los Angeles County Business Licensing. At
Council's direction staff would.take all necessary steps toward formal adoption
and implementation by July 1, 2005.
MPT/O'Connor asked why staff was recommending a renewal fee.
ACM/DeStefano responded that revenue from renewal fees would allow staff to
maintain inventory for marketing economic development and assure that the City
was receiving the proper sales tax if the business were determined to be a sales
tax producing entity.
MPT/O'Connor asked if staff believed the home-based businesses would come
forward.
ACM/DeStefano said there was no certainty that home-based businesses would
reveal their business. However, staff would work with the Chamber to market the
City's reasons for implementing a process that would include an opportunity for
those businesses to be listed and become known as a provider of services to the
community.
� MPT/O'Connor expressed concern about the motivation of the program.
C/Zirbes said that the ordinance would contain a first violation fine of not less
than $100 for operating in the City without a business registration. In his opinion
there were numerous good reasons to register businesses and felt the City
JANUARY 18, 2005 PAGE 2 CC STUDY SESSION
should move forward. He was concerned about charging $30 for the initial
registration and felt the charge should be lowered to a $10 one-time charge.
Personally, he would prefer to have a no -cost registration fee but understood
there was an initial cost for software and staff time. He also felt it might take a
couple of years to get everyone to participate in the program.
MPT/O'Connor asked if the goal was to register everyone who did not have a
business license or businesses including those that have a business license with
the County of Los Angeles.
ACM/DeStefano stated that in staff's view all business and all individuals
list. For example, the Mary Kay person working out of her home, the roofconducting business in the City should be included in the Business Registration
ing
contractor who comes into the City to . roof a house as well as a business
operator who was located within the City would be included. He confirmed to
MPT/O'Connor that business registration would apply to Waste Management and
Valley Vista.
M/Chang said that in spite of future problems he felt there would be more benefit
to the City and its businesses with implementation of this program. He agreed
with C/Zirbes that the program should be easier to implement by establishing a
$10 one-time registration fee and believed it would be appropriate to charge a
$10 annual renewal fee.
MPT/O'Connor asked if each individually licensed cosmetologist doing business
inside a beauty salon would have to register under the program.
ACM/DeStefano responded that a determination had yet been made for those
types of situations.
CM/Lowry felt it would be useful for the City to know how many individuals
worked within each business because the City has no idea how many people
drive to D.B. to work each day and this program would allow the City to capture
information useful to economic development.
ACM/DeStefano stated that this type of program is very common to other cities.
The programs are conducted differently and cities charge significantly more than
this Council is contemplating.
C/Herrera agreed with the $10 fee.
MPT/O'Connor concurred.
ACM/DeStefano concluded that Council's direction was to move forward to
implement the program based on a $10 startup registration fee and a $10 annual
renewal fee and said that staff would report back to the Council in about eight
weeks.
D
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS.
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
DATE: 1 3 0 r
00 7
401
oe iquoo 4
r� �6
expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
g;�
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
,-7 1A PAIV_ PHONE:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signa#ure
U�
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
�T
Y'l +G k 117 U r DATE: 15-- 2~ 01K�
(,7V�Nl�fra Iu ftl rOn, "PHONE: / 7 (�
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
9;�
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION
Signatur
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
- 2k �}�QU` dP'� - PHONE: W (O o
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: Wo 0 DATE: 05-10-;,! 1 t�-
ADDRESS: Fg1cq)c WM, PHONE: 9o.9) bbc) --�nfb
ORGANIZATION: DI 14ad r Ho k S4� I
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: t} �, p(r d Cf cOj
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
9;
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
i
Signatur
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
I expect to address the Council on the subject
name and address as written above. _
DATE: 0 5 ~ 0,3 -0S
PHONE: '7J9 ?&/. 7,3565
a item Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
®MM�Aw- �
ignature