HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/21/2001_ Tuesday, August 21, 2001
4:00 p.m. — Study Session CC -8
6:15 p.m. Closed Session CC -8
6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting
South Coast Air Quality Management District/The Government Center
Main Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Mayor Bob Huff
Mayor Pro ,Tem Carol Herrera
Council Member Eileen Ansari
Council Member Wen Chang
Council Member Debby O'Connor
City Manager Linda C. Lowry
City Attorney Michael Jenkins
City Clerk Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding
an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909)860-2489 during -regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need: of any type of special equipment, assistance
or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform
the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the
Please refrainfrom om smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers.
Next Resolution No. 2001 - 47
Next Ordinance No. 02(2001)
STUDY SESSION: 4:0.0 p.m. AQMD/The Government Center Room
CC -8
a. Discussion regarding the Community/Senior Center Project
b. Diamond Ride (Dial -A -Cab) Program Modifications.
CLOSED SESSION: 6:15 p.m. CC -8
Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) Exposure to litigation threatened against the
City; one case.
2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m., August 21, 2001
3A.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor
INVOCATION: Pastor Daniel Barrozo, Calvary Chapel
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Chang, O'Connor,
Mayor Pro Tern Herrera, Mayor Huff
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.A.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Community Volunteer Patrol
Members Teo Galelli, 1500 hrs.; Ben Potter, 500 hrs.; Jerry Arnet, 500 hrs.
and Frank DuQuite 1000 hrs
3.A.2 Presentation of City Tile to Dave Winn, Former Mayor of the City of Industry.
3.A.3 Presentation Re: Diamond Bar On -Line
3.A.4 Presentation of City Tile to Diamond Bar High School Key Club, sponsored
by Walnut Valley Kiwanis Club; Kiwanis Club International; 1st Place
Worldwide Service Fundraising, 2nd Place Worldwide Project Awareness -
UNICEF, Iodine Deficiency Disease
BUSINESS OF THE MONTH:
3.A.4 Presentation of City Tile to Kim Lindemann, owner of Boulevard Bagels.
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 2
3B. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
4. 4.a PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on
each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public
to directly address the, Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although
the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council
generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda'.- Please
complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk completion of this form is
voluntary). ''There is a five-minute maximum time limit when- addressing the City
Council.
4.b RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of
the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion
and no action on such matters may take place.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 FINAL CONCERT IN THE PARK (Westwind Review) - August 22, 2001 -
6:30 — 8:00 p.m. — Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr.
"Tremor" the Quakes Mascot, will be therefrom 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
5.2 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION —August 23, 2001 7:00 p.m.,
AQMDIGovernment Center Hearing Board Room, 21865' E. Copley Dr.
5.3 DIAMOND BAR NIGHT AT THE QUAKES - Saturday, August 25, 2001
Meet`at City Hall at 5:00' p.m., 21825 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 28, 2001 - 7:00 p.m.,
AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865'E. Copley Dr.
5.5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY September 3, 2001 — City Offices will be closed in
observance of the Labor Day Holiday. City offices will reopen Tuesday,
September 4, 2001.
5.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — September 4, 2001 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD
/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: _
6.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:
6.1.1 Special Joint Meeting with the Traffic and Transportation Commission
of July 31, 2001 Approve as submitted.
6.1.2 Study Session of July 31, 2001 — Approve as submitted.
6.1.3 Regular Meeting of August 7, 2001 — Approve as submitted.
i
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 3
Requested by: City Clerk
6.2 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MINUTES Regular Meeting of July
12, 2001 — Receive and File.
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ---Regular Meeting ofJuly10, 2001 —
Receive and File.
Requested by: Planning Division
6.4 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of
May 24, 2001 - Receive and File.
Requested by Community Services Division
6.5 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated August 21, 2001
in the amount of $642,266.56.
Requested by: Finance Division
6.6 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES — Filed byJohn `Jasso November 27, 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the
Claim for Damages filed and refer the matter for further investigation by the
Risk Manager.
Requested by: City Clerk
6.7 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR WORK PERFORMED BY BRONGO
CONSTRUCTION FOR REPAIR OF THE LANDSLIDE IN SYCAMORE
CANYON PARK.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept the
work performed by Brongo Construction and direct the City Clerk to file the
Notice of Completion and release any retention amount 35 days after the
recordation date.
Requested by: Community Services Division
6.8 NOTICE OF COMPLETIONFORWORK PERFORMED BY JEFF MERRICK
CONSTRUCTION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES AT THE AQMD CAMPUS.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept the
_work performed by Jeff Merrick Construction and direct the City Clerk to file
the Notice of Completion and release any retention amount 35 days after the
recordation date.
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 4
Requested by: City Manager
6.9 INCREASE CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDED BY
GARY NEELY TO INCLUDE CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES
NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve a
$10,000 increase to the previously awarded contract for consulting services
provided by Gary Neeley.
Requested by: City Manager
6.10 CONTRACT WITH TOM VAN WINKLE AND AFFILIATES IN THE AMOUNT
OF $15,000 FOR VIDEO SERVICES AND RELATED DOCUMENTATION
AS REQUIRED.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve a
$15,000 contract with Van Winkle and Affiliates to provide, specialized video
and documentation services (videography) geared toward litigation mitigation.
Requested by: 'Planning Division
6.11 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OBTAIN
STATE AND LOCAL SUMMARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION
THROUGH THE 'FINGERPRINTING OF EMPLOYEES INCLUDING
VOLUNTEERS AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -XX.
Requested by: City Manager
6.12 GRADING BOND EXONERATIONS:
(a) EXONERATION OF CASH DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF GRADING BOND
IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,504.00 FOR LOT 19 OF TRACT 33417 (3255 S.
DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF
DIAMOND BAR).
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
- exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify the owner and financial
institution of this action.
(b) EXONERATION OF GRADING BOND NO. NA 100304 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $163,801.00 FOR TRACT 13594 (21951 GOLDEN SPRINGS
DR., COUNTRY SUITES).
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 5
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify the principal and surety of this
action.
(c) EXONERATION OF GRADING BOND NO. P289-33-63 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $11,790.00 FOR PARCELS F AND G OF TRACT 47850 (2859
WATER COURSE DR., CRYSTAL RIDGE ESTATES).
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify the principal and surety of this
action.
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.13 CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH R.F. DICKSON COMPANY TO
IMPLEMENT A STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS COMPOSTING PROGRAM
IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,410.00;, AND AUTHORIZE A CONTINGENCY
AMOUNTOF $5,000 FOR PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS TO BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER,` FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION
OF $37,410.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
amendment with R.F. Dickson Co.
Requested by: Public Works Division
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be
heard.
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: VACATING A PORTION OF HAWKWOOD
ROAD WITHIN LOT 28 OF TRACT 47850 OF THE CRYSTAL RIDGE
ESTATES.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the
public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing and adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -XX. -
Requested by: Public Works Division
7.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: ADOPTING THE LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION
REPORT AND CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETS
THE CONFORMITY CRITERIA OF THE 1999 -CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT 'PROGRAM (CMP).
Recommended 'Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the
public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing and adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -XX.
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 6
Requested by: Public Works
7.3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 26235 - A REQUEST BY C&A
DEVELOPERS AND DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS TO SUBDIVIDE
TWO VACANT RESIDENTIAL PARCELS TOTALING 5.5 ACRES INTO
THREE LOTS FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE CUSTOM
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS.
Recommended Action: It is recommended by the Planning Commission that
the City Council- open the -public hearing; take=public=testimony, close the
public hearing and approve the application with the Findings of Fact and
conditions as listed within Resolution No. 2001 -XX.
Requested by: Planning Division
8. OLD BUSINESS: None
9. NEW BUSINESS: None
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMENTS: Items raised by
individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
"QUICK CAP" MINUTES
AUGUST 21, 2000
STUDY SESSION: 4:15 p.m. AQMD/The Government Center Room CC -8
a. Discussion regarding the Community/Senior Center Project
b. Diamond Ride (Dial -A -Cab) Program Modifications.
ADJOURNED STUDY SESSION: 5:55 p.m.
1. CLOSED SESSION: 6:15 p.m. Room CC -8
Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) Exposure to litigation threatened against the
City; one case.
2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:35 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Ansari
INVOCATION: Pastor Daniel Barrozo, Calvary Chapel
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Chang, O'Connor,
Mayor Pro Tem Herrera, Mayor Huff
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor
3A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES PROCLAMATIONS:
3.A.1 Presented Certificates of Recognition to Community Volunteer Patrol
Members Teo Galelli, 1500 hrs.; Ben Potter, 500 hrs.; Jerry Arnet, 500 hrs.
and Frank DuQuite 1000 hrs
3.A.2 Presented City Tile to Dave Winn, Former Mayor of the City of Industry.
3.A.3 Presentation Re: Diamond Bar On -Line (Continued to September 4, 2000)
3.A.4 Presented City Tile to Diamond Bar High School Key Club, sponsored by
Walnut Valley Kiwanis Club; Kiwanis Club International; 1st Place Worldwide
Service Fundraising, 2nd Place Worldwide Project Awareness -UNICEF,
Iodine Deficiency Disease
BUSINESS OF THE MONTH:
3.A.4 Presented City Tile to Boulevard Bagels, owner, Kim Lindemann.
3B. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
4. 4.a PUBLIC COMMENTS: Sue Sisk - Thanks for recognizing small
businesses. Reminded Council that Lorbeer field conditions are badly in
need of attention—does the City have any idea what plans the School District
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 2
may
have? Concerned that the City is now allowing Walnut to use the City's fields.
4.b RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT:
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 FINAL CONCERT IN THE PARK (Westwind Review) — August 22, 2001 —
6:30 — 8:00 p.m. — Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr.
"Tremor" the Quakes Mascot, will be there from 6:00 — 7:00 p.m.
5.2 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION — August 23, 2001 — 7-00 p.m.,
AQMD/Government Center Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.3 DIAMOND BAR NIGHT AT THE QUAKES — Saturday, August 25, 2001 —
Meet at City Hall at 5:00 p.m., 21825 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 CITY LANTERMAN MONITORING COMMITTEE MEETING — August 27,
2001 — 7:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center Room CC -8, 21865 E. Copley
Dr.
5.5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — August 28, 2001 — 7:00 p.m.,
AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY — September 3, 2001 — City Offices will be closed in
observance of the Labor Day Holiday. City offices will reopen Tuesday,
September 4, 2001.
5.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING — September 4, 2001 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD
/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved by C/Ansari, seconded by C/Chang to
approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item Nos. 6.9, 6.10 and 6.11.
Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote:
6.1 APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:
6.1.1 Special Joint Meeting with the Traffic and Transportation Commission
of July 31, 2001 — As submitted.
6.1.2 Study Session of July 31, 2001- As submitted.
6.1.3 Regular Meeting of August 7, 2001 — As submitted.
6.2 RECEIVED & FILED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MINUTES —
Regular Meeting of July 12, 2001.
.6.3 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 3
Meeting of July 10, 2001.
6.4 RECEIVED & FILED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
—
Regular Meeting of May 24, 2001.
6.5 APPROVED AMENDED VOUCHER REGISTER — dated August 21, 2001 in
the amount of $642,266.56.
6.6 DENIED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES — Filed by John Jasso November 27, 2000
- and referred the matter for further investigation by the Risk Manager.
6.7 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR WORK PERFORMED BY
BRONGO CONSTRUCTION FOR REPAIR OF THE LANDSLIDE iN
SYCAMORE CANYON PARK - and directed the City Clerk to file the Notice
of Completion and release any retention amount 35 days after the
recordation date.
6.8 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR WORK PERFORMED BY
JEFF MERRICK CONSTRUCTION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES AT THE
AQMD CAMPUS - and directed the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion
and release any retention amount 35 days after the recordation date.
6.12 APPROVED GRADING BOND EXONERATIONS:
(a) EXONERATED CASH DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF GRADING BOND IN
THE AMOUNT OF $9,504 FOR LOT 19 OF TRACT 33417 (3255 S.
DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF DIAMOND
BAR).
(b) EXONERATED GRADING BOND NO. NA 100304 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $163,801 FOR TRACT 13594 (21951 GOLDEN SPRINGS DR.,
COUNTRY SUITES).
(c) EXONERATED GRADING BOND NO. P289-33-63 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $11,790 FOR PARCELS F AND 0 OF TRACT 47850,(2859 WATER
COURSE DR., CRYSTAL RIDGE ESTATES).
6.13 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH R.F. DICKSON COMPANY
TO IMPLEMENT A STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS COMPOSTING
PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,410; AND AUTHORIZED A
CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $5,000 FOR PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS
TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL
AUTHORIZATION OF $37,410.
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.9 INCREASE IN CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDED BY
GARY NEELY TO INCLUDE CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES
NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 4
Concerns raised by C/Ansari re potential conflict of interest and others.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve a
$10,000 increase to the previously awarded contract for consulting services
provided by Gary Neely.
Moved by C/O'Connor, seconded by MPT/Herrera to approve. Motion
carried 4-1 by the following Roll Call vote:
6.10 CONTRACT WITH TOM VAN WINKLE AND AFFILIATES IN THE AMOUNT
OF $15,000 FOR VIDEO SERVICES AND RELATED DOCUMENTATION
AS REQUIRED.
MPT/Herrera requested that the same condition be placed in Mr. Van
Winkle's contract as in Mr. Neely's contract to the effect that he would not be
involved in any political activity within D.B. during the term of the, contract.
Moved by MPT/Herrera, seconded by C/Ansari to approve a $15,000
contract with Van Winkle and Affiliates to provide specialized video and
documentation services (videography) geared toward litigation mitigation.
Sue Sisk—
Jeff Koontz (as a D.B. citizen) — Include an amount for supplies.
Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote:
6.11 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-47: AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO
OBTAIN STATE AND LOCAL SUMMARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION
THROUGH THE FINGERPRINTING OF EMPLOYEES INCLUDING
VOLUNTEERS AND CONTRACT EMPLOYEES.
Moved by C/Ansari, seconded by MPT/Herrera to adopt Resolution No. 2001
47.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: VACATING A PORTION OF HAWKWOOD
ROAD WITHIN LOT 28 OF TRACT 47850 OF THE CRYSTAL RIDGE
ESTATES.
M/Huff declared the Public Hearing open.
Sue Sisk - Pointed out that there were residents on Hawkwood who were not
aware of the hearing.
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 5
There being no further testimony offered, M/Huff continued the Public
Hearing to the next regular City Council meeting on September 4, 2001.
7.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: ADOPTING THE LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION
REPORT AND CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETS
THE CONFORMITY CRITERIA OF THE 1999 CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP).
M/Huff declared the Public Hearing open.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the
public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing and adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -XX.
7.3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 26235 - A REQUEST BY C&A
DEVELOPERS AND DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS TO SUBDIVIDE
TWO VACANT RESIDENTIAL PARCELS TOTALING 5.5 ACRES INTO
THREE LOTS FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE CUSTOM
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS.
M/Huff declared the Public Hearing open.
Tim Sung Oak Knoll Rd., suggested that surrounding homeowner input
should be sought before this project is approved. Delivered 3 pages of
signatures of surrounding homeowners.
Michelle Yi Oak Knoll 'Rd., complained about dust and noise that took place
during the grading process on the lot across the street.
Mrs. Garyia — Oak Knoll Rd. understood that the dust and noise is just a part
of everyday construction and felt that JCC had been reasonable in offering
cleanup after the work has been completed.
Kurt Nelson —
Torn Wong
There being no further testimony offered, 'M/Huff closed the Public Hearing.
Moved by'MPT/Herrera, seconded by C/Ansari to approve the application
with the Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within Resolution No. 2001-
48.
8. OLD BUSINESS: None
AUGUST 21, 2001 PAGE 6
9. NEW BUSINESS: None
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMENTS: Items raised by
individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting.
11. ADJOURNMENT: Therebeing no further business to conduct, M/Huff
adjourned the meeting at 925 p.m. in memory of Don Horn.
gonzalezG 0 0 D A L F
5 35 ". E S T GREEN S 1 REET S U.'{ T E ZOO ?ASA -^=ENA C .. 9 1i D S' i
City of Diamond Bar
Community Center/Senior Center and Library
Schematic Design Revisions
August 20, 2007
The following summarizes design initiatives taken in response to meetings with City Council and with
individual City Council members. These initiatives are represented in the attached plan, roof plan,
and 3-dimensional schematic sketches. Overall, we have sought a design expression that has more
dramatic movement and glassy openness without sacrificing the distinctiveness of the
natural/classic material accents previously proposed: stone, wood, and copper.
1. The height of the Banquet Room entry hall has been increased from 14' to 18'. (Also visible
behind the entry hall is a still -higher clerestory window into the Banquet Room.) Window
mullion treatment has been revised to rhythmically celebrate this verticality.
2. Solid walls, piers, and high planters facing the main entry road have been decreased. The
building is now much glassier and open to approaching visitors
3. Benches and passive bubbling water features in low stone enclosures have been added to the
perimeter of the motor court.
4. Additionally, the rear wall of the Banquet Room entry hall (facing the motor court) is clad in
stone with quiet water running vertically down over it. This feature, accent -lit at night, will
provide a dramatic identity for the entry hall.
5. Throughout the design, roof forms have been revised to be more casual and dynamic, in
keeping with the dynamic movement of the surrounding mountains. The roof forms have also
become more extroverted, sloping up and out to oncoming visitors as a gesture of welcome
and invitation.
6. The radial foreground walls that were thought to fragment the landscape have been eliminated
for a freer landscaping in the foreground, with 2 clear connective pedestrian paths provided
between the Community Center motor court and the Library.
7. In 'keeping with its potential division into rooms, clerestory lighting has been introduced
throughout the interior areas of the Banquet Hall.
8. The design proposes a rich and contrastive pallette of warm materials and textures, including
redwood and copper trim, natural stone, weatheredsteel, and textured/colored motor court
paving. The architects will provide a 'range of samples at the August 21st workshop.
„
a
4 `
lif
X «;
t
i
=
o
W
i
a
O=
U z
O �
o
JZ
I
}
W LUS
m <
W U
m
U —
�
a
r a
z
m
2
0
a
Q -
V
m
M
R'
O
W
U
Z
W
U
}
F-
Z
i4 �
b
U
r ,
o a —
Q-
1- WIL
L�
w U
- -` JLi
.
1
W w a 1 V) � "
U. -j 0 1 F- 1 l 0. \ N 1
—J0 1 w�WJLO \
V) Z
0 1 ' Cl 3 1
0 1
aa
Woo
Li F-
L
- —
l7 w
— — — - — — — — — — — — — —
>
a� H� LD (4 1 } I m
12
LY
N co C El
m 3 IL
L i I N p
a'ol J_wI I aao Zo
3 W ¢ af
I �L
❑ I I I � a
I v
----------- =-- -==- J w r
u,
LL,
I I w I I "'v _ m
Cl I "�
I
� o
W I I �a
I m
u _WCU
z
W E 2Ew
Llt)
b
° L W
r_ T17
T b
C7
J
W W
O
8
Nw
Q _
Z p
Ds
a
w
¢
m
3
UU
m
y F
J
D
F Q
z
—�
O
Z W
Z M
�x
a a
ME
a
O
w
U
�
Z
W
U
July 22, 2001
To Whom It May Concem:
I am writing this letter to document the threat of coyotes in our neighborhood currently and in previous
months. During February of 2000 we saw coyotes on our coater (the earner of El Encino and Cholame
Dr.) and on Bower Cascade approximately 5 times. We saw them anywhere from 7:30 PM until 12:00 am.
One rooming in February my 2 oldest children, boys, ages 10 and'8 were walking to school on EI Encino at
approximately 8:00 am. They saw a coyote coming towards them. They were veryfrightened and turned
around and started walking home. A'neighbor of mine saw the coyote and the children and stopped her van
and picked; them up. Ater this encounter my children were very scared to walk to school. The same
neighbor who picked. up my children also encountered a coyote on the school grounds of Diamond Point
School at dusk in the upper field when they were finishing baseball practice.` My husband and myself and
surrounding neighbors were very relieved to know that the city had hired a trapper to trap the coyotes. I
was concerned for my children's safety. These animals did not run when they saw humans but merely
continued what they were doing. We were satisfied when the coyotes were trapped. Unfortunately, there is
now another coyote in our neighborhood. A friend of mine spotted him walking next to our house at
approximately 8:30 one evening. My neighbor below me has found the remains of at least 4'dead cats in
his yard over the past 2 weeks. He said he sees the coyote sitting on the hillside from his property up to
ours in the early morning. My biggest concerns now are the safety of my children and my dog. The
humane society told me my 5 -foot fence would not keep theeayOte out of my yard. They said this coyote
would attack anything usually its size or smaller. 1 have a 1 -year-old son and a 3 -year-old daughter that fit
into this category. Now I have to be concerned about them being attacked by a coyote anytime we step foot
into the front or backyard. In addition I have a golden retriever/spaniel mix that weighs about 35 pounds
who is also in danger. If my dog were out roaming the neighborhood' the humane society would pick her
up and confine her with no problem. I would` also be fined. But since there is a wild animal roaming the
neighborhood there is nothing I can do. Last week there was a 3 -year --old child attacked in Irvine by a
coyote during the day. I do not want the attack of my children by coyote to be the next news story.
Sincerely,
t'' tel. -
Ju ' retschmar"
23860 Cbolame Dr.
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Listed' below are other household's addresses that have seen or encountered coyotes over the past months in
our neighborhood.
541 El Encino Ik.
501 EI Encino 7 r.
419 E1 Encino Dr. -
420 EI Encino Dr.
313 E1 Encino Or.
23807 Cholame Dr.
THE DOLEZAL COMPANY
4251 South Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401
(805)" 544-3990 FAX (805) 784-0888
3 20 August 2001
Mr. Robert S. Huff, Mayor; and ti
Mr. James DeStefano, Assistant City Manager and R v.
Director Community Development Department
City of Diamond Bar 4. '' -
_ P.
21825 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar,California 91765-4177
_,:
SUBJECT: City Council Hearing Regarding Vacating a Portion of Hawkwood Road within
Tract 47850 and Approval, of The Associated Proposed Resolution No. 2001-44.
Dear Honorable Mayor Mr. Huff and Mr. DeStefano, -
The purpose of this letter is to request a continuance of Subject Agenda Item 7:1 to th64ext City-
Council Meeting. This continuance is to provide time for us to meet with City Staff ant};come tq_'-
an agreed set of conditions regarding this matter. r
In a telephone conversation this afternoon Mr. DeStefano and I discussed the following facts:
(1.) The Dolezal Company is the present owner of the property abutting the Hawkwood Road -
Street that is proposed to be Vacated as a Public Street;
(2.) We were not notified of or invited to any City meetings regarding Vacating this street
(except last weeks notice of this City Council Meeting) nor any notice that the City Planning
Commission was considering this item and had passed,a recommendation to the City Council.
(3.) We did not know what had been recommended by City Staff until we requested a fax copy of "
the Staff report prepared for this City Council meeting that we received today.
(4.) The City is well aware of the fact that we have a complete easement over the 60 foot width
of the land of the street called Steeplechase Lane abutting our property from the "Country" to the
original end of Hawkwood Road prior to Tract 47850. The court judgment affirming that
easement also includes a permanent restraining order against any interference with that easement.
(5.) Our Lot 1 uses the full street'frontage of that portion of Hawkwood Road proposed to be
vacated as its access for ingress and egress as well as the 55 foot portion that is not to be vacated;
(6.) The thought of placing some type of emergency access gate right in the middle of the front
of our Lot is not acceptable to us;
(7.) The fact that we do not object to the Emergency Access Gate at the present cull-de-sac where
Hawkwood Road ended prior to Tract 47850 actions. In fact JCC Homes should have done what
they promised to do long ago to the City Council. That promise was to place the gate at the
existing fenced area where the chain link fence gate, that I originally built long ago, now exists.
A meeting with us and City Staff to resolve the conditions to be placed on this Vacating action is
certainly necessary to fully resolve the issues prior to bringing it back to the City Council for
approval. A continuance will certainly be appreciated:
Sincerel
4arren F. D'olezal,' President
l
___ __
Zd Wtl8S: T L 100E TZ -6ntl -q?-6T T98 606 : 'ON 3NOHd 3J1 n&i UHINOW WO'
INTEROFFICE
MEMORANDUM
DIAMOND BAR
COMMUNITY &DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of t e City Council
VIA: Linda C. Lowry, City Manag
FROM: David G. Liu, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 16, 2001
SUBJECT: PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS FOR DIAMOND RIDE (DIAL -A-
CAB) PROGRAM
Staff has met with Diversified Paratransit, Inc. (DPI) to discuss and review the Diamond
Ride Program. The following information is submitted to provide Council with information to
review and discuss possible modifications.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The Diamond Ride (Dial -A -Cab) program is funded through Proposition A, local transit
Funds, In Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the approved budget for the Dial -A -Gab system is
$360,000.00
BACKGROUND
In April 1995, the City established the Diamond Ride (Dial -A -Cab) Program to provide a
reliable, quality transportation system for the elderly (60 years of age and older) and
physically challenged residents of Diamond Bar. The Diamond Ride (Dial -A -Cab) Program
operates seven (7) days a week, 24 hours a day, within a designated geographic boundary
and designated facilities. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit "I." As the City's current
service provider, DPI has been serving the community since the inception of this program as
a curb -to -curb service (please see Exhibit 11" for service guidelines).
Diamond Ride Program Page 2 of 6
August 16, 2001
DESIGNATED FACILITIES:
In addition to the geographic boundaries, the City has designated 31 medical/doctor's
facilities. The City has also designated the Ontario Airport and Fullerton Amtrak Station as
eligible destinations.
PASSENGERS:
To date the City has issued a total of 1,893 Diamond Ride Identification 'Cards. For your
information we have prepared Exhibit 11111", a summary of the Fiscal Year 2000-2001
activities and annual comparisons (Exhibit "IV") from Fiscal Year 1995-96 to the Fiscal
Year 2000-2001,
DISCUSSION:
The current fees are $1.90 flag drop (flag drop is the fixed charged for initiating a trip) and
$1.90 per mile meter rate, with no wait time fees, and a 10% administrative fee charged by
DPI. The per mile meter rate increase was approved by City Council on June 19, 2001.
The increase of 10 cents was due to increased costs of gasoline, insurance, and wages.
As shown in Exhibit for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, the average number of monthly riders
is 2,225 and the average monthly contract expense is $30,057.10. Of the 2,225 riders, 47%
of the trips are to destinations outside of Diamond Bar and 53% of the trips are within the
City of Diamond Bar. The average cost per trip is $18.03 and the net cost per passenger is
$13.51.
The demand for this service has steadily increased every year since the start up in April
1995. Through year end June 30, 2001, 1,863 cards have been, issued to Diamond Bar
seniors and physically challenged. With a successful program comes an increased cost to
the City. In the Fiscal Year 1995-96, the average monthly cost was $15,168.19. During the
Fiscal Year 2000-2001, the monthly cost has increased to $30,057.10 (please see Exhibit
"IV"). With the popularity of the program, the City should expect this increase to continue.
DAILY/REGULAR USERS:
After reviewing the monthly reports provided by DPI, we have found 13 cardholders (eight
seniors and five disabled) using this service on a daily, or near daily, basis (please see
Exhibit "V"). From November 2000 to June 2001, expenses charged to the City cost
$43,012. This amount represents 18,% of the total cost of $234�,437 between the months of
November 2000 and June 2001 (please see Exhibit V).
r
Diamond Ride Program Page 3 of 6
August 16, 2001
USAGE OF DAILY/REGULAR USERS:
To better understand the usage, we learned that four of the cardholders use the service
daily to go to work/school. Another example is a cardholder who uses the program to travel
to La Puente to pick up a friend, return to Diamond .Bar and then travel to a Chino Hills retail
center. The couple then returns back to Diamond Bar and the cardholder travels with the
guest back to La Puente and then returns home. This trip costs the City $136 round trip.
Occasionally, this same cardholder will pick up the La Puente resident and return to
Diamond Bar for the day and then back to La Puente to drop off the friend and home again
to Diamond Bar. The trip costs the City $62. This type of travel occurs approximately two to
three times per week.
Two to three residents who are regular users limit their travel to three times per week.
These trips are to medical facilities for dialysis and other medicalprocedures. However,
one dialysis center is in Fontana and the trip costs the City $118 per round trip. Another
resident travels to a medical center in Pomona with 'a cost of $180 per week.
SNAPSHOT OF CARDHOLDER ACTIVITIES FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 2001:
To provide a "snapshot" of the usage, the following is a review of the all trips for the month
of June 2001:
Total Trips:
Below 20 trips
Over 15 trips
Over 20 trips
Over 30 trips
Over 40 trips
Over 50 trips
156 cardholders
6 cardholders
5 cardholders
3 cardholders
0 cardholders
1 cardholders
Furthermore, during the month of June 2001, twenty trips were made to the Ontario Airport
costing the City $777. This represents a one-way fare to the Ontario Airport costing the City
an average of $38.87 (exact fare depends on departure point in the city).
Diamond Ride Program Page 4 of 6
August 16, 2001
The following is also a review for the month of June 2001 of the most frequent destinations
traveled outside the city by all cardholders:
Trips Outside of City by Destination: Cost:
Pomona 91 Trips $1,837.10
West Covina 51 Trips $1,345,80
Covina 46 Trips $1,317.50
Brea 44 Trips $ 955.10
Rowland Heights 44 Trips $ 604.80
Industry 39 Trips $ 767.30
Fullerton 21 Trips $ 617,90
La Puente 19 Trips $ 640.60
The majority of the Diamond Ride customers utilize the program on an occasional basis.
The cost for travel within the city limits can range from $6.00 up to $20.00 per trip. Travel
outside the City can range from $23.00 for one way to the City of Industry, up to $37 one
way to the northwestern boundary at Covina. Many of the residents only utilize the program
to travel to the Ontario Airport (average cost $38.87).
MODIFICATIONS
Staff has met with Diversified Paratransit, Inc. (DPI) to discuss and review the excessive
usage by some residents, as well as reviewing the travel destinations and costs for the
average user. The following modifications to the program were discussed:
A, Limit number of monthly trips to 30 per cardholder.
B. Increase fare to out -of -city destinations for all but medical facilities to $3.00/per
trip (currently $1.50/per trip).
C. Considerfare increase to Ontario Airport and Fullerton Amtrack Station from
$5.00/per trip to $10.00/per trip.
D. Reconsider medical facilities list for excessive destinations.
E. Reconsider the out -of -city boundaries.
A. Limit Number of Monthly Trips: The Diamond Ride Program was
established to assist seniors and disabled in travel to and from medical appointments,
shopping and miscellaneous errands. The demand for the service on a daily or very regular
basis for transportation to work is overloading the system. There is other public
transportation available for commuting to work with a 20% discount given to Diamond Bar
residents. The City's Diamond Ride program is designed as a supplement to the available
public transportation services. Another ,option for a disabled person' is the Los Angeles
Diamond Ride Program Page 5 of 6
August 16, 2001
County "Access Services" Program operated by MTA as a transportation opportunity for
disabled persons. The cost for Access Services is based on mileage and can cost between
$1.50 for 0-6" miles up to $4.00 for over 22 miles. However, Access Services is only a last
alternative after public transportation and dial -a -cab programs.
Currently, Diamond Ride does not have any trip restrictions, i.e. the numberoftrips per
month a participant may utilize the system. If trip restrictions of 30 trips per month were
imposed in the Diamond Ride Program, 98% of the June ridership would not be affected (if
y p p June ridership would not be
the month) trips were limited to 20 per month, 95 /o of the.
affected). The average ride cost for June 2001 was $18.31.
The following is a comparison of savings to the City based on a limit of 30 or 20 trips per
month (using the month of June 2001 as a basis):
Limit of 30 Trips Per Month
Total of Riders Affected Number of Trips Savings
4 164 $3,011
Limit of 20 Trips Per month
Total of Riders Affected Number of Trips Savings
9 294 $5,398
The new DPI computer system would allow the City to monitor the number of trips for each
cardholder. On the 15th of each month, a report would be generated to check the usage of
all cardholders. Any cardholder with 20 or more trips would receive a postcard alerting them
to this fact. On the 21 s of each month, the report would be generated daily to monitor
usage. A block could be placed on an individual cardholder who has exceeded the 30 trips
per month limit. If the cardholder has exceeded the limit, but calls from a destination other
than their residence, DPI will still pick up the cardholder and return them to their home. No
passenger would ever be left stranded due to the monthly trip limit.
B.In crease Fare to Out -of -City Destinations for all but Medical Facilities to $3.00/per
trip(currently
$1.50/per tri To place a higher per trip charge to destinations
other than medical facilities would encourage riders to limit their trips. The fee of $3.00 still
is within reason, but riders would think twice before taking more frivolous trips. Trips to
medical facilities would stay at the current rate of $1.50.
C. Consider fare increase to Ontario Airport and Fullerton Amtrack Station from
$5.00/per trip to between $7.50/ to$10.00/per trip: The current fare to the Ontario Airport
is a great bargain for the traveler. The lowest per day parking fee is $6.00. Many'of 'the
cardholders use the card only for the purpose of traveling to and from the airport. Not many
Diamond Ride Program Page 6 of 6
August 16 2001
cardholders use the Fullerton Amtrack Station. Increasing the fare would not hinder the
traveler from using the program. The price of $10.00 per trip is still a bargain when you
compare the cost of parking.
D. Modify Medical Facilities List for Excessive Destinations: Currently, the City has
31 medical facility destinations. A number of the destinations are a considerable distance
from the current out -of -city boundary (i.e. Kaiser Permanente, Savi Ranch Parkway, Yorba
Linda; Kaiser Permanente, 'Lakeview Ave., Anaheim Kaiser Permanente, Euclid Ave.,
Anaheim; Kaiser Permanente, Fontana; and Haven Ave.', Rancho Cucamonga). Most of the
locations are Kaiser Permanente facilities. There are numerous Kaiser Permanente
facilities closer to Diamond Bar which offer the same services as the locations listed above
(i.e. dialysis programs are offered at the West Covina facility). Staff has been successful in
the past in assisting residents who have requested to go to a medical facility outside the
boundaries and/or not on the 'medical facility list, to obtain authorization at a more local
facility (and with no degradation of medical support).
E. Reconsider the Out -of -City Boundaries: Diamond Bar currently has the most liberal
and generous boundaries compared to the cities of Walnut, San Dimas, Covina, Claremont,
La Verne, and Pomona. Some of these cities only have transportation within the city
y most liberal with a five (5) mile limit to destinations outside
boundaries. Walnut is the next
the cit limits.' See Exhibit Vi for Dial -a -Cab Contract Comparison.
Conclusion:
That the City Council review and discuss this program and provide comments' and input for
staff to incorporate:
Prepared By:
David G. Liu/Sharon Gomez
t
rn
0
C)
(D
m
Co
(D
CD
r-
ao
o;
rI
- C N
0
O O
T N
Nf
O
M
CD
CD
O
�
r
O
O
W..
N
LO
r
CV
co
�.
In
[D
Lfi
O
V
Oli CA
CD
cc
Cp.
O
CO
(O
O'.
O
•)
_
M N
M
MIN
N
69
C7
N
-O
M
M
M
Oi
N
O.
�
C7
I
I
L ay.
O
C1D
W
r.
O
Y
(n
O
ct
'tC)
tC')
M N
M
I T
r
r
O.
I T
V O
N
ap
L()
_ Q.
CV
CV
(2
'a
C'h
CV
(�]
('M C6
�
cE
C+J
co
Q%
d3
6f3
V3,
69
'6f}
&4
6R} '..69
69
&4
69
�
Z
CD.
OD
CCJ
V'
CO
".N
CD tt
CC7
cY
('7
cq
Z H
LO
LO
ui
ao
rn
r`
rn
ao ao
rn
rn
ao
00
Ud9'
1 6
44
vi
f;;
r;;
69
f;;69
to
6%
to
cl,
T
Q'
ri
Oi
��
MOS
O
Oi
O
O
O
O.I
a% L
N
r
O
I r
T
�. r
CO.:.
coOi
M
d'
M
r
m
00
i a0
O
, co
O
m
(9'
CA
r
coO..
d'
eO
I
�I
��
I
I
1
T
�
I
r-. L.
`M"Io�o�Q
rniMio
co
CO
N
N
•-
I z
,NCO-
rn
rn
r
r
o
o
O
.a
o
N
olm
M N
coo
to
cm
r
1M
T'
io
L.
Lo
o
CO
m
N
V
T
T
Z
r
�..�
O
CD
O.
cc-
C
I T
T
T
r....
r'
'i.
O
inI
O
rn
LD
�1
m
00
rn
r
M
N
v
V
M
F,
�I
�i
rn
T
T
ao
T
o,
�I
r
(o
co
TI Lq
NI
(fl
M
(o
o
I
TICli
rMI
-a
ID W
.!C '�
O�
I CMO
O
¢
�
co
VO
O
O
N
r-
N
0000
CD
1 M
-,wZ
M
M
M
Wil'
.-
M
M
dr
C)
?'Q7
I
a
:G
O
m
co
CO
c0
m
O
m
co
Q
O
r,
O
N
CO
M
co
co
N I
co
LO
CA
co
n
(D
�
n
mN
(D..
ao
N
cq
00
Gj
i
Z
+ice
i i
I
I
CD
-�%
Lf)
COI
CD
com
r
N
ap
'rn
co
r
n
�0pnpp
l ,-
T
r
�
N
f
-CD
CD
(MD
CA
to
co
COAD
c T
JU
C19 p
OT
Q,n
:�
T
'CO
Cf�
to
O"
V
'I'-
EO
M
G Ca
U
�y
�
m
I
w,
toUl)
nU').
coD
E
m
co
I
ro
0
O
m
v
rn
v
o
as
y-
rn
N
tv
rn
co
ur7
-LOj_
Q
COQ)"
uj
(M•i
' CLC').
A(7,
CMf') :'.
LO
- // /��/��
cn
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
Y.
r
T
T
T
T
M
M
:O
N
O
L
O
r
CO
O.
N
PO7
C�{
�
0
CP`
M
Cn
c}.
_O
d- rn
OD CD
�
N
:.
N
cm
:N
CV
c
N'
N
-
N..
N
N:'CV
N
N
X10
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
p
O
r
O
�
E -9
O
SII
a
>I
U
C
.O
Q
C
p
N
��
�i
31cololz
N
U
O
N���
0
7
LLIm
Q
c�
M�-Oj
~I.Q
O O CO N Cp C
T O T CO N T
00 Nrj T CA 1l- O CO00 � N I'd" LO
<
+- "N 00 " M N 0
lKe
W
O
69 f;q 69 EF} V9 SCJ-
f}(D
W
M co
C
Q
CO O O O T C7
cu U
T T T T T
W
�
<Fj- ta 6 4'
a
a
CA p i
r N T t.[) CO M
0 00 LO LO C
O „NC�
-> ' C,-
Q< L
I N N N. M 00
0.
I
W
O
T cr
NOO N N e
N
X00
fEf�
CO ' N N CO ct' N
ca
r- 00 , O'> 00 O r
Q .a
O
«.
Q
O
CO 000 0 i 000 O
i.r
'-
Q
v
N 'yam.
V" T CO LO M
c' V V CO
Q
O
aa
Q p ,6
CO.M '- O co F-
T
T
S 0.
z
a
O
N .
r CO r CO t
�
CD N Ch CA.I N M
et ch d O ICp
CO
>
Q �
I
T rn d OIOo
>, N y
�
M d co to 0
O O T O CM 6[)
A
O O CO N Cp C
T O T CO N T
00 Nrj T CA 1l- O CO00 � N I'd" LO
<
+- "N 00 " M N 0
r r N- N
O
69 f;q 69 EF} V9 SCJ-
f}(D
(DN
Z Q• -0
M co
C
[__
CO O O O T C7
cu U
T T T T T
Q
<Fj- ta 6 4'
7. N yQ
CA p i
r N T t.[) CO M
0 00 LO LO C
O „NC�
-> ' C,-
Q< L
I N N N. M 00
I
W
O
T cr
NOO N N e
N
X00
CO ' N N CO ct' N
ca
r- 00 , O'> 00 O r
Q .a
F
«.
*- N N 00 N O
O
CO 000 0 i 000 O
_a
'-
c a U
F- o
00
N 'yam.
V" T CO LO M
c' V V CO
—ca
C-
Q p ,6
CO.M '- O co F-
T
T
S 0.
.f Q
CUa
N .
r CO r CO t
�
CD N Ch CA.I N M
et ch d O ICp
CO
>
Q �
I
T rn d OIOo
>, N y
�
M d co to 0
O O T O CM 6[)
O
�'It LOoLO
fl_ co, co CD CD N
Q
L L'i' h CD 0 C"L
v c6
CA In O m O O
O y
LO
-
- LL U--
CF)
O [M C)
Exhibit "V"
Daily User's Summary By Rider 11)
Type of
Monthly Cost %° of Monthly
Month-
# of Trips
Amount (Meter)
Daily User
to City
Total Cost
I.D. No. A
Senior
Nov
39
$1,053.10
$29,106.66
3.62%°
Dec
25
$832.90
$26,277.80
3.17%
Jan
35
$1,068.80
$30,500.30
3.50%
Feb
44
$1,399.00
$25,628.20
5.46%
Mar
46
$1,525.30.
$30,275.40
5.04%
April
53
$1,529.10
$31,032.57
4;93%
May
40
$1,270.50
$31,751.58
4.09%
June
37
$1,024.50
$29,865.10
3.30%
Total - ID A
319
$9,703.20
LD No. B
Disabled
Nov
33
$730.60
$29,106.66
2.51%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
42
$804.70
$30,500.30
2.64%
Feb
41
$725.50
$25,628.20
2.83%
Mar
46
$831.60
$30,275.40
2.75%°
April
23
$460.10
$31,032.57
1.48%
May
35
$736.10
$31,751.58
2.37%
June
37
$761.60
$29,865.10
2.45%°
Total - ID B
257
$5,780.80
LD No. C
Disabled
Nov
17
$363.60
$29,106.66
1.25%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
30
$194.10
$30,500.30
0.64%
Feb
28
$306.60:
$25,628.20
1.20%
Mar
34
$251.20
$30,275.40
0.83%
April
33
$171.80
$31,032.57
0.55%
May
24
$404.60
$31,751.58
1.30%
June
28
$322.60
$29,865.10
1.04%
Total - ID C
194
$2,014.50
LD No. D
Disabled
Jan
22
$319.60
$30,500.30
1.05%°
Feb
26
$386.00
$25,628.20
1.51%
Mar
20
$260.50
$30,275.40
0.86%
Apr
11
$144.40
$31,032.57.
0.47%
May
0
$0.00
$31,751.58
0.00%
June
0
$0,00
$29,865.10
0.00%
Total - ID 'D
79
$1,110.50
-11-
Type of
Monthly Cost
% of Monthly
Month
# of Trips
Amount (Meter)
Daily User
to City
Total Cost
I.D No. E
Disabled
Jan
43
$747.80
$30,500.30
2.45%°
Feb
43
$259.00
$25,628.20
0.86%
Mar
49
$253.20
$30,275.40
0.84%
April >
14
$747.80
$31,032.57
2.41%
May
$31,751.58
0.00%
June
$29,865.10
0.00%
Total - IDE
149
$2,007.80
I.D. No. F
Senior
Nov
0
$0.00
$29,106.66
0.00%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0;00%
Jan
73
$893.50
$30,500.30
2.93%°
Feb
69
$930.30
$25,628.20
3.63%
Mar
76
$941.30
$30,275.40
3.11%
April
53
$616.50
$31,032.57
1,99%°
May
0
$0.00
$31,751.58
0.00%
June
57
$684.60
$29,865.10
2.21%
Total - ID F
255
$4,066.2
I.D. No. G
Senior
Nov
0
$0.00
$29,106.66
0.00%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
30
$606.30
$30,500.30
1.99%
Feb
31
$530.50
$25,628.20
2.07%
Mar
35
$582.40
$3.0,275.40
1.92%
April
15
$250.00
$31,032.57
0.81
May
18
$399.40`
$31,751.58
1.29%°
June
26
$424.70
$29,865.10
1.37%
Total - IDG
155
$2,793-30
I.D. No.H
Senior`
Nov
0
$0.00
$29,106.66
0.00%°
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
0
$0.00
$30,500.30
0.00%
Feb
26
$330.80
$25,628.20
1.29%
Mar
29
$303.30
$30,275.40
1.00%
April
22
$171.90
$31,032.57
0.55%
May
38
$565.40
$31,751.58
1.82%°
June
2
$26.60
$29,865.10
0.09%
Total - ID H
117
$1,398.00
-2-
f
Type of
Month `
% of Monthly
# of Trips_
Amount (Meter)
Monthly Cost
Daily User
to City
Total Cost
I.D. No.
Senior
Nov
0
$0.00
$29,106,.66
0.00%°
Dec
10
$224.40
$26,277.80
0.85%
Jan
22
$380.60
$30,500.30
1.25%
Feb
22
$25510
$25,628.20
1.00%
Mar
21
$224.60
$30,275.40
_0.74%
April
21
$235.00
$31,032.57
0.76%
May
17
$259.80
$31,751.58
0.84%
June-
8
$141.50
$29,865.10
0.46%
Total - IDI
121
$1,721.00
I.D. No.J
Disabled
Nov
0
$0.00
$29,106.66
0.00%°
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
38
$762.70
$30,500.30 '
2.50%°
Feb
34
$562.20
$25,628.20
2.19%
Mar
35
$560.50
$30,275.40
1.85%
April
0
$0.00
$31,032.57
0.00%°
May
18
$399.40
$31,751.58
1.29%
June
26
$424.70
$29,865.10
1.37%
Total - ID J
151
$2,709.50
I.D. No. K
Senior
Nov
6
$158.70
$29,106.66
0.55%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
4
$128.40
$30,500.30
0.42%
Feb
19
$612.60
$25,628.20
2.39%
Mar
51
$1,231.20
$30,275.40
4.07%
April
28
$927.40
$31,032.57
2.99%
May
27
$870.80
$31,751.58
2.81%
June
24
$961.50
$29,865.10
3.100%
Total - ID K
159
$4,890.60
-3-
Type of
Month
Monthly Cost
%a of Monthly
# of Trips -
Amount (Meter)
Daily User
to City
Total Cost
I.D. No. L
Senior
Nov
23
$288.30
$29,106.66
0.99%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
38
$414.80
$30,500.30
1.36%
Feb
35
$347.30
$25,628.20
1.36%
Mar
44
$527.10
$30,275.40
1.74%0
April
35
$41`2.30
$31,032.57
1.33%
May
15
$129.50
$31,751.58
0.42%
June
14
$167.90
$29,865.10
0.54%
Total - ID L
143
$2,287.20
I.D. No. M
Senior
Nov
23
$288.30
$29,106.66
0.99%
Dec
0
$0.00
$26,277.80
0.00%
Jan
38
$414.80
$30,500.30`
1.36%
Feb
35
$347.30
$25,628.20
1;36%
Mar
44
$527.10
$30,275.40
1.74%
April
35
$412.30
$31,032.57
1.33%
May
0
$0.00
$31,751.58
0.00%
June
57
$684.60
$29,865.10
2.21%
Total - ID M
232,
$2,674.40
Grand Total of each ID #
$43,157.00
Grand Total of monthly cost &
$234,437.61,
18%
-4-
Exhibit "Vi"
DIAL -A -CAB CONTRACT COMPARISON
Walnut Way Get About Diamond RideSan Dimas Covina Claremont
2000
Annual
15,284
21,537'
25,731
29,054
16,658
35,168 -
Passengers
2000
Annual
$213,805
$286,391
$335,237
$196,700
$97,100
$182,139
Expense
2000
Cost per
$13.99
$13.30
$13.03
$6.77
$5.83
$5.18
Passenger
Seniors
Seniors
Seniors
Eligibility
General Public
Et
Disabled
Et
Disabled
General Public
EL
Disabled
General Public
Only
Only
Only
$1.00
$2.00
General Public
In City
In City
Fare
None
None
None
$0.75
$2.00
$3.00
Out of City
Out of City
$0.50 In City
$i in City
$1 In City
Seniors Et
$1.00
$1.00
•$1.50 Out of City
$0.50
Disabled Fare
Out of City
$1.50
$1.50
Out of City
Out of City
$0.50 To/From
Joslyn Center
City Limits
San Dimes
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
Boundar es
and
La Verne
and
Plus
Plus
City Limits
5 Miles Outside
Claremont
10 Miles Outside
5 miles for
5 miles for
Only
Pomona
Medical Only
Medical Only
Mon - Fri
Mon - Fri
7 Days a week 7 Days a week 7 Days a week 7 Days a week
Hours' 8AM to SPM 6AM to.7PM
24 Hours a Day g.30AM n 3PM 24 Hours' a Day 24 Hours a Day 24 Hours a Day Sat
7AM to 6PM
Service Type Curb to Curb Door to Door Curb to Curb Curb to Curb Curb to Curb Curb to Curb
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) §
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Study Session at 4:00 p.m. in Room CC -
8, Closed Session at 6:15 p.m. in Room CC -8 and a Regular Meeting in the Auditorium at
the South Coast Air Quality Management District)/The Government Center located at
21865 E. Copley Drive; Diamond Bar, California at 6:30 p.m. on August 21, 2001.
I, LYNDA BURGESS, declare as follows:
am the City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that a copy of the agenda for the City
Council Study Session, Closed Session and Regular Meeting, to be held on August 21,
2001 was posted at their proper locations.
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct and that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 17th day
of August, 2001, at'Diamond Bar, California.
_ /s Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
City of Diamond Bar
I
21825 E. Copley Drive • Diamond Bar, CA 917654178
(909) 860-2489 • Fax (909) 861-3117PO -
j98y
www.CityofDiamondBar.com
July 23, 2001
Kim Lindemann
Boulevard Bagels
574 N. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Dear Ms. Lindemann:
On behalf of the Diamond Bar City Council, I would like to take this
opportunity to express our; appreciation to Boulevard Bagels for their support
i
and contribution to the economic strength of the City of Diamond Bar.
The City Council would like to formally recognize Boulevard Bagels at its -
meeting on Tuesday, August 21, 2001. The meeting is held at 6:30p, at
the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
Robert S. Huff
Drive, Diamond Bar. Please contact my secretary, Ms. Nancy Whitehouse,
Mayor
909/396-5666, to indicate your availability.
-
CarolMayor
-Mayor
I look forward to seeing you August 21.
Tern
Pro
Pro Tem.
Eileen R Ansari :
Sincerely,
Council Member
Wen Chang
Council Member
Robert S. uff
Deborah H. CVConnor `
Mayor
Council Member
RSH:nbw
c: City Council
City; Clerk
-` Recycled paper
:-.'.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
JULY 31, 2001 :04
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Huff called the Special Joint Meeting of the City
Council and Traffic & Transportation Commission to order at 4:00 p.m. in the Lobby
of Diamond "Bar City Hall, 21825 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
2. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, Mayor Pro
Tem Herrera and Mayor Huff.
Traffic and Transportation Commissioners, Leonard,
Morris, Vice Chairman lstik. Commissioner Kung and ChairmanVirginkar were
excused.
Also present were`. Linda Lowry, City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney;
James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David
Liu, Director of Public Works; Kirk Phillips, Associate Engineer and members of the
Diamond Bar/Walnut Sheriff Department.
3. FIELD VISIT OF CENTERLINE STRIPING ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS - City -
sponsored transportation departed City Hall at 4:15 p.m. and visited the following
locations:
1) Evergreen Springs Drive
2) Bella Pine' Drive
3) Cliffbranch Drive
4) Quail Summit Drive
5) Montefino Avenue
6) Decorah Road
7) Minnequa Drive
8) Sunset Crossing Road
Following the Centerline Striping tour, the City Council and the Traffic & Transportation
Commission met in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865
E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA' at 6:00 p.m.
4. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT CENTERLINE STRIPING DETERMINATION POLICY
C/O'Connor stated that consistency is very important to her and that she preferred
broken yellow lines over double yellow. She felt that double yellow would be ok for
channeling traffic.
JULY 31, 2001 PAGE 2 SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
CITY COUNCIL AND TRAFFIC
& TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
C/Chang stated that he felt that Minnequa Dr. required a double yellow line due to
the street's narrowness.
MPT/Herrera felt that stripes were an extra caution for the driver. Sometimes, it is
warranted to create caution and slow down.
C/Ansari felt that everything was fine as it was. Decorah Road is 30 feet wide.
Recreational Vehicles need to be addressed. Botts dots were recently added. She
felt that Montefino was a good match to the stripes.
M/Huff stated that in his area, he would need to see how double yellow lines would
be at drop off. He was happy with the skipped lines near Quail Summit. As a
resident, double stripes have an industrial look. The Sheriff is not using this as a
reinforcement tool (as was originally sold), thus, the skipped line is better.
C/Chang pointed out that street sweeping and trash pickup needs to be looked into
as those services relate to RV parking and inoperable vehicles. He suggested that
another sweeping day be added to the contract (approx. $120,000).
C/Leonard felt that uniformity is good but with the curvy streets in the area,
centerlinesand single broken lines work. She felt that Evergreen Springs should
have double striping.
C/Morris felt that consistency is good but street width is an important factor, which
needs to be considered.
C/lstik felt that yellow striping was appropriate. What currently exists is therefor a
reason. Striping does not have to be standardized. No one wants Botts dots
because they make noise and have a commercial, CalTrans look.
Clyde Hennessee asked what the legal parking distance is from the curb as it relates
to egress and ingress? He suggested that brackets painted on the street be used
to define parking spaces.
M/Huff asked about the cost of paint.
C/lstik stated that there are plastics for paint. No parking on inside of curves would
also help.
Sgt. Flannery explained that the Sheriff does not wish to enforce crossing over the
lines in residential areas:
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Chairman lstik adjourned
the Traffic & Transportation Commission Special Meeting at 6:20 p.m. to the regular August
65,
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION "414
JULY 31, 2001
COMMUNITY CENTER/SENIOR CENTER/LIBRARY PROJECT
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayos Huff called the study session to order at 6:40 p.m.
in Room CC -8 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21825 E. Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
2. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, Mayor Pro
Tem Herrera and Mayor Huff.
Also present were: Linda Lowry, City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney;
James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David
Liu, Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Lynda
Burgess, City Clerk; Teresa Arevalo, Sr. Administrative Assistant; Todd Strojny, Sr.
Administrative Assistant; Kirk Phillips, Associate Engineer; Gina Tharani,. Sr.
Accountant, and members of the DB/Walnut Sheriff's Department.
3. Discussion of the Community Center/Senior Center/Library. Project.
Presentation and discussion of revised renderings of structures by David Goodall
and hardscapes and landscape by Calvin Abe.
MPT/Herrera said that prior making a decision about a water element, Council
would need to know the costs for construction and ongoing maintenance. She
requested that these cost items be limited to the Community Center and not the
Library.
MPT/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to not have the architects spend any
additional time, effort or money on the library concept until additional information is
received by Council.
DCM/Doyle explained that the library had been included only to the extent that the
landscaping runs through the entire site. Staff has no plans to spend any additional
time, effort or money on inclusion of landscape related to the library beyond this
point.
Mr. Abe pointed out that landscaping will be done only in connection with the first
phase. However, it is important to have an overall "site vision."
Motion carried unanimously.
C/O'Connor liked the stream element because it fit in with the canyons and
mountains relative to the area.
Council Members concluded that they do not care for palm trees as part of the
"country" element.
C/Chang liked the idea of a garden atmosphere and inclusion of a stream or creek
K 0
JULY 31, 2001 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
element. However, he was concerned about the cost to construct and maintain
such an element.
M/Huff liked the community circle, the stone path and the water element with it's
stream -like look, but not palm trees. He expressed concern about costs. Further,
he preferred that trees be placed randomly rather than soldier -like.
MPT/Herrera believed there should be more grass and fewer trees in the community
circle area.
Council concurred that there should be more grass and fewer trees and that the
trees should be placed randomly rather than in a soldier -like fashion. Council
Members expressed a desire to see different types of architectural renderings for
the buildings. Council further concurred to maintain the project at 22,500 sq. ft with
seating for 500.
Council agreed to meet during a Study Session on August 21, 2001 to further
discuss the matter.
C/Chang asked for an explanation of the $177,000 increase in the contract costs as
a result of the increase in 4,000 sq'. ft. of space.
David Goodall explained the percentage of construction fee increase. The current
fixed contract relates to an 18,400 sq. ft. building at a cost of approximately
$3,000,000. Based on discussions for a 22,000 sq. ft. building and the work
completed, the current contract would need to be renegotiated. His firm cannot do
a $5,000,000 building under the terms of the current contract.
CIO'Connor suggested that Council Members provide pictures of community center
structures that they like for the August 21 meeting.
4. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Mayor Huff
adjourned the Special Study Session at 8:26 p.m.
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Robert S. Huff, Mayor
6A3
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AUGUST 7, 2001
CLOSED SESSION: None
s
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pro Tem Herrera called the meeting to
order at 6:35 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government
Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Manager
Linda Lowry.
INVOCATION: The invocation was offered by Reverend Mike
Schuenemeyer, D. B. Congregational Church.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Pro Tem Herrera, and Council Members
Ansari, Chang and O'Connor. Mayor Huff was excused.
Also present were; Linda Lowry, City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City
Attorney; James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of Public
Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director;. Linda Magnuson, Finance Director;
Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented.
3. A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, -CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.A.1 Presentation of $50,000 check by Assemblyman Bob Pacheco to the T. H.
Pendergast California Parole Museum.
3.A.2 Presented Certificates of Recognition to Dr. Julius Kpaduwa, Dr. Stella
Kpaduwa, Joan Byron and Sue Schuster for the medical care they donate to
the people of Mbano, Nigeria.
3.A.3 Presented Certificate of Recognition to Ziyad Jabaji for his participation in the
United States National Chemistry Olympiad.
3.A.4 Presentation by Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff Department regarding Quarterly
Statistics, Deputy Diane Dodd, Team Leader.
3:13. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None Offered.
4.a. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Martha Bruske objected to the Council's goal
"work with the County for possibility of acquiring the D. B. Golf Course. She asked
if the Sheriff Department's survey was successful, when will it be expanded to other
areas in the City, who has approved of or modified the questions, and if the results'
would be reviewed at a public meeting.
Clyde Hennessee questioned Consent Calendar Items 6.4, 6.6 and 6.12.
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL
Rebecca Romo read the "Extension of Remarks" recognition presented to Council
Member Debby O'Connor by Congressman Gary Miller. The "Extension of
Remarks" is the highest honor given to a constituent.
Sgt. Bill Flannery responded to Martha Bruske that the survey process is far from
over. The recent survey, conducted over a four-week period, was the first phase.
On July 10, a community meeting was held to discuss the results of the survey and
to obtain feedback from the residents. Most of the survey results will be published
in the September issue of the "Diamond Bar Community News." As a direct result
of the survey, the department spent 12 to 16 weeks working"to'correct-the"problems
that were identified through the survey and communitymeeting. The department
intends to continue the process into other neighborhoods once the first phase is
completed.
MPT/Herrera responded to Clyde Hennessee that a complete Voucher Register is
available for all attendees. The current voucher register incorporates the previous
three weeks (rather than two weeks) which may account for the increase.
CA/Jenkins explained that Consent Calendar Item 6.6 conforms to the resolution
that was adopted some time ago and which addresses the city's regular meetings
to the City Council's practice of occasionally holding study sessions and closed
sessions
prior to the regular 6:30 p.m. meeting. This resolution merely updates the
prior resolution.
CSD/Rose reported that, with respect to Consent Calendar Item 6.12, officials are
paid with fees collected from teams that participate in the adult basketball and
softball program. This is merely a payment of revenues already collected.
CM/Lowry stated that she is working with the members of the Sheriff's Department
on the creation of a policing plan for the City and the Sheriff's survey is a component
of that plan. The method by which the surveys will continue to be taken will be'
brought forward to Council for approval.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 CONCERTS IN THE PARK and NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - August 8, 2001
- 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., STEVE COPELAND & RAGING SUN (West Coast
Contemporary Blues) - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Dr.
5.2 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - August 9 2001 - 7:00
p.m., The Government Center Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.3. PLANNING COMMISSION -August 14, 2001 - 7:00 p.m., The Government
Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 CONCERTS IN THE PARK August 15, 2001 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
INSTANT REPLAY (Classic 50's & 60's) - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL
Golden Springs Dr.
5.5 COMMUNITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE -August 20, 2001 - 7:00 p.m.,
Room CC -2 of The Government Center, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - August 21, 2001 - 6:30 p.m., The Government
Center Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.7 CONCERTS IN THE PARK (LAST OF THE SUMMER SERIES) -August 22,
2001 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 "p.m. - WESTWIND REVIEW `(Summer Luau) -
Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Dr." Tremor" the Quakes
Mascot, will be present from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
5.8 DIAMOND BAR NIGHT AT THE QUAKES - Saturday, August 25, 2001
Meet at City Hall at 5:00 p.m., 21825 E. Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Ansari moved, C/Chang seconded, to approve
the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 6.4 and 6.9. Motion carried by the
followingRoll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, MPT/Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS'- M/Huff
6.1 APPROVED MINUTES:
6.1.1 Study Session of July 17, 2001 - As submitted.
6.2 RECEIVED & FILED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
6.2.1 Regular Meeting of June 28, 2001.
6.2.2 Special Meeting of July 16, 2001.
6.3 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting
of June 26, 2001.
6.5 REVIEWED & APPROVED TREASURER'S STATEMENT -Month of June
2001
6.7
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-46: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING THE DAY AND TIME OF CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-413.
(a) AWARDED A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM TORITO LANE TO
TEMPLE `AVENUE TO MOBAS'SALY ENGINEERING, INC. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $828,140; ALLOCATED $401',252 FROM THE
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROPRIATED PROP C FUND BALANCE FOR THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND; AND AUTHORIZED A CONTINGENCY
AMOUNT OF $60,000 FOR PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS TO BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION
AMOUNT OF $888,140.
(b) AWARDED CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE
GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS FROM TORITO LANE TO
TEMPLE AVENUE PROJECT TO DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES AND
AUTHORIZE A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT"OF $3,000 FOR PROJECT
CHANGE ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER, FOR A
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $33,812.
6.8 EXTENDED CONTRACT WITH CAROL A. DENNIS FOR MINUTE
SECRETARY SERVICES FOR CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION,
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION, INDUSTRY EAST DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, LANTERMAN MONITORING COMMITTEE, TRES
HERMANOS CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY
FOUNDATION AND WILDLIFE CORRIDOR CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,200 FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2001 THROUGH
JUNE 30, 2002 WITH A ONE-YEAR RENEWAL OPTION FOR THE CITY.
6.9 ACCEPTED THE WORK PERFORMED BY L.A. SIGNAL INC. FOR GRAND
AVENUE/GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE TRAFFICSIGNAL MODIFICATION
PROJECT; AUTHORIZED AN ADDITIONAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF
CONTRACT A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $48,824.25 AND
AUTHORIZED THE E CITY CLERK TO LE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND RELEASE ANY RETENTION AMOUNT 35 DAYS AFTER THE
RECORDATION DATE.
6.11 (a) AWARDED CONTRACT TO GREEN GIANT LANDSCAPE FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AT
PETERSON PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $205,607 PLUS A CONTINGENCY
AMOUNT OF $20,560, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $226,167.
(b) AWARDED CONTRACT TO DMC DESIGN GROUP FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE
PETERSON PARK DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,100.
(c) AWARDED CONTRACT TO D & J ENGINEERING FOR PLAN
CHECK SERVICES FOR THE PETERSON PARK DRAINAGE AND
IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,120.
6.12 AWARDED CONTRACT TO SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000 FOR ADULT SOFTBALL AND
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL
BASKETBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES DURING THE 2001-02 FISCAL
YEAR.
6.13 (a) AWARDED CONTRACT TO MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE/SUNSET CROSSING
ROAD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $186,209.15
PLUS A CONTINGENCY OF $18,620.85, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION
OF $204,830. _
(b) AWARDED CONTRACT TO D k & J ENGINEERING FOR ' PLAN
CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE GOLDEN SPRINGS
DRIVE/SUNSET CROSSING ROAD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,135 PLUS A
CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $715, FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF
$7,850.
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.4 VOUCHER REGISTER - dated August 8, 2001 in the amount of $935,174.75.
C/Ansari expressed concern that the City had not been provided reports
regarding Gary Neely's scope of work and the hours spent on this matter.
She requested that future contract considerations be sent out on a request
for bids. She suggested that there may be a potential conflict of interest
relating to a contract with Mr. Neely because he is a consultant to the City of
Industry's Redevelopment Agency.
DCM/DeStefano reported that this consultant has not produced reports but
has provided the City with services that include attendance at a variety of
meetings as directed and assisted in the preparation of responses to various
plans that outside organizations have submitted with respect to open space
and environmental issues as well as the ecological study done by the county,
etc. This consultant has assisted the City in understanding what some of the
electricity deregulation opportunities are provided as a variety of cities are
looking at such enterprises as possibilities for their future. This consultant
has provided detailed invoicing for meetings he has attended at the request
of the City.
C/Ansari stated that this consultant has campaigned for various Council
members and assembly races, which she views as nepotism.
Following discussion, 'C/Ansari moved, C/O'Connor seconded, to approve
Item 6.4. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote with C/Ansari voting
against approval of P.O. 10878 in the amount of $5,800 and C/O'Connor
abstaining from a total of $160 with respect to a potential conflict of interest
in the Lanterman Expansion Project matter.
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE6 CITY COUNCIL
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, MPT/
Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/Huff
6.9 APPROVED A THREE-YEAR CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR INTEGRATED
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $145,720 FOR THE
FIRST YEAR WORK PROGRAM AND DIRECT STAFF TO DEVELOP
SPECIFIC WORK PROGRAM/BUDGET FOR SUBSEQUENT YEARS AND
AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE THREE-YEAR
CONTRACT.
C/Ansari and J. Michael Huls explained the program's expansion, increase
in fees and contract costs due to additional State mandates.
Following discussion, C/Ansari moved, C/Chang seconded, to approve a
three-year consulting services agreement with Huls Environmental
Management for integrated environmental services in the amount of
$145,720 for the first year work program, direct staff to develop specific work
program/budget for subsequent years and authorize; the Mayor to execute
the three-year contract. Motion carried' by the following Roll Call voter
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang,' O'Connor, MPT/
Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/Huff
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) ADVISORY BOARD FOR EXPENDITURE, OF
GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $61,940 (INCLUSIVE OF THE
REQUIRED 10% MATCHING AMOUNT OF $6,194 FROM THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR) FOR FY 2001-02,
MPT/Herrera declared the Public Hearing open.
There being no testimony offered, MPT/Herrera closed the Public Hearing
C/O'Connor moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve the recommended use
of funds as requested by the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call vote`.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, MPT/Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/Huff
AUGUST 7, 2001
8. OLD BUSINESS:
PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL
8.1 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 93-66C AMENDING THE POLICIES,
PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF FACILITIES
OPERATED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, INCLUDING THE USE OF
TENNIS COURTS LOCATED IN PUBLIC PARKS FOR PROFESSIONAL
TENNIS INSTRUCTION.
Kay Dalli thanked the ad-hoc committee for attempting to set forth some type
of regulation in an effort to control unauthorizeduse of D.B.'s public tennis
courts. She believed that Item 1 Rule 5 should include complete verbiage in
the final draft to alleviate confusion.
Mark Dalli, owner, Mad Dog Tennis and Racquet Sports, believed that
because Walnut Unified School District is strictly enforcing their rules and not
allowing lessons to be given on school courts, pirate teachers would invade
the eight D.B. tennis courts.
Robert Chou, spokesperson for the D.B. Tennis Association, thanked the City
for taking time to consider the tennis court issue. The telephone number for
individuals who wish to join the association is (626) 617-2379. He asked for
a copy of the proposed Resolution No. 93-66C. If the content of the
resolution mirrors the letter he received from GSD/Rose, he would support
the resolution. By his own accounting, there are more than 250 tennis
enthusiasts who support the resolution. He believed that the resolution
grants' no special treatment to anyone and it is good for the residents and
tennis players of D.B. as well as the City as a whole. He requested that from
this point forward, all complaints regarding tennis court usage be fully
documented and that the complaint be fully investigated with the investigation
report being available to the public.
Charles Lin spoke in support of the proposed resolution. He believed that
residents of D.B. should have first priority for tennis court use.
Brian Su supported the proposed resolution. Last year, he was ranked #1 for
doubles and ranked #2 and #3 in singles. He currently coaches 70% of the
D.B.H.S. tennis team. He felt he was being harassed by Sheriff's deputies
for teaching D.B. residents.
Eddie Shaw spoke in support of the proposed resolution. If un -licensed, un -
permitted use of tennis courts is allowed, it will open the floodgates to other
- - problems. If people are permitted unregulated use of tennis courts, rogue
instructors will come to D.B. to use the courts.
Dexter MacBride, speaking as a member of the D.B. Tennis Association, said
that his organization has attempted to be of assistance to the City and
appreciates the work of the Parks & Recreation Commission and CSD/Rose
AUGUST 7, 2001 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL
toward remedying this situation. The association believed that the proposed
resolution is reasonable and practical and is in accord with the majority of
tennis programs throughout the United States. His son, Dexter MacBride, is
a professional tennis player living on the east coast. He referred to
CSD/Rose's August 1 letter regarding tennis court rules and instructor permit
application. He agreed with the opening statement and the eight points that
followed. He took exception to CSD/Rose's presentation statements with the
exception of attaching municipal codes.
Tommy'Lu said he has observed non-residents using D.B. tennis courts and
he asked `for the Council's assistance in protecting the interests of D.B.
residents.
Paul Moravek took exception with individuals who presented a case for not
allowing Brian Su to give tennis lessons to D.B. residents. He was pleased
with the evolution toward the proposed resolution, which incorporates the will
of the people. He strongly supported the proposed resolution.
At C/O'Connor's direction, CSD/Rose confirmed that the inclusion of the
reference to municipal code infractions in his August 1 letter was for
informational purposes only. The information will not be included in the
resolution.
Following Council questions, comments and discussion, C/Chang moved,
C/O'Connor seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 93-66C amending the
policies, procedures and regulations for the use of facilities operated by the
City, including the use of tennis courts located in public parks for professional
tennis instruction. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, MPT/
Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/Huff
CA/Jenkins stated that the new rules are in effect with the adoption of the
resolution.
C/O'Connor and MPT/Herrera hoped instructors would not abuse the new
resolution by monopolizing court time.
8.2 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX: ESTABLISHING ALTERNATE
VEHICLE ROUTES TO CHAPARRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL AND INSTALLING
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AS APPROPRIATE; ANTICIPATE THE USE
OF GAS TAX FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,000 AND REQUEST
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO RECONFIGURE THE
CHAPARRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL PARKING LOT TO INCREASE AND
MAXIMIZE ON-SITE PICK-UP/DROP-OFF ZONE.
AUGUST 7, 2001
PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL
MPT/Herrera asked staff to make certain that Ray Shackelford is advised
when this item is agendized for further discussion so that he has the
opportunity to offer his comments.
David Little, 22910 Aspen Knoll, asked Council to act on this matter, which
has been an ongoing matter for the past three years.
C/O'Connor sympathized with Mr. Little's concerns but she believed it was
essential for the City to communicate with the school district to improve traffic
circulation.' Mike Armijo, Public Information"Officer forr°Walnut Valley Unified
School District, told her the district would meet on August 20 to discuss
options for mitigation.
C/Ansari moved, C/Chang seconded, to continue the matter to a future
meeting after staff has met with school district officials regarding joint efforts
to improve the traffic circulation in the area of Chaparral Middle School.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Chang, O'Connor, MPT/
Herrera
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -Nome
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS- M/Huff
9. NEW BUSINESS: None
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMENTS: C/O'Connor spoke
about the Concerts in the Park and the sponsorship of food booths by the D.B.
Community Foundation. On July 19, the City Birthday/Anniversary subcommittee
met. That evening, she attended the "Friends of the Library" folk tale presentation.
On July 24, she and M/Huff attended ribbon cutting ceremonies for a new martial
arts company. She, M/Huff and MPT/Herrera attended the parole officers' week
ceremonies. The D.B. softball team participated in the City of Azusa's softball
tournament. D.B. is sponsoring a softball tournament beginning at 7:00 p.m. on
Thursday, August 9, at Peterson Park. On July 27, she and C/Chang participated
in the Chamber's networking walk through the Ralph's Shopping Center. The
majority of complaints involved trash and parking. She and C/Chang also attended
the July 25th Chamber networking breakfast. On July 26, she attended the IMC
breakfast during which Assembly Member Pacheco spoke about legislation affecting
businesses. On July 31, Council Members attended the ` Sheriff's luncheon
presentation of Quarterly Statistics for D.B. On'August 2, the Finance Committee
met.
C/Chang invited residents to partake in the final two Concerts in the Park. He
complimented the Chamber of Commerce and staff on their fine preparation for the
Council's walk-through of the Ralph's Shopping Center businesses.Council
recommended that staff contact the property owner or management company to
discuss steam cleaning the trash bin area in back' of the stores. The parking
AUGUST 7, 2001
PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL
problems indicate a growth in the economy and expansion of shopping. He thanked
the storeowners for their participation in the City's growth and thanked residents for
shopping D.B. Graffiti is another problem in the center, which appears to be
perpetrated by outside influences. Council is moving forward with the community
center project.
C/Ansari attended the following events: A water policy meeting for SLAG; L.A.
County Solid Waste Committee meeting; the League of California Cities Energy and
Environment committee meeting; a SCAG solid waste meeting; League of California
Cities meeting in Monterey; the Sheriff's luncheon; the Inland Valley EDC meeting;
the August 2 Friends of the Library event (she encouraged residents to visit the
"Friends of the Library" bookstore); a San Gabriel Economic Partnership meeting,
and a graduation party for a resident who graduated from Washington School of
Law. Miss Diamond Bar will participate in the Miss California pageant in September
and she needs funds to help her get to the event. Anyone wishing to contribute may
call Linda Headley at 861-8454. Tomorrow, the Chamber will be serving food at the
Concert in the Park. She encouraged residents to attend.
MPT/Herrera stated that Lanterman's environmental document will likely be released
the beginning of September. The document will discuss the new severe behavioral
program that will be instituted by the facility. She invited the public to obtain a copy
of the document for review and put their comments in writing to the Department of
Developmental Services.
11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, MPT/Herrera
adjourned the meeting at 9:37 p.m.
ATTEST:
Carol Herrera, Mayor Pro Tern
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
JULY 12, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Virginkar called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Headquarters Hearing Board Room, 21865 East Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner Leonard.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners: Chairman Arun Virginkar, Vice Chairman Jack lstik, and
CommissionersJoyceLeonard and Roland Morris.
Commissioner Joseph Kung arrived at 7:20 p.m.
Also Present were David Liu, Director of Public Works; Kirk Phillips,
Associate Engineer; John Ilasin, Assistant Engineer; Linda Smith, Development
Services Assistant; Sharon Gomez, Administrative Assistant, and Deputy Mark St.
Amant, DB/Walnut Sheriff's Station.
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of June 14, 2001.
C/Morris moved, C/Leonard seconded, to approve the June 14, 2001
meeting minutes. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Leonard, Morris, VCflstik,
Chair/Virginkar
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Kung
III COMMISSION COMMENTS:
IV PUBLIC COMMENTS:
V CONSENTCALENDAR:
None Offered
None Offered.
None
Z
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE 2 T&T COMMISSION
VI OLD BUSINESS:
A. Chaparral Middle School Traffic Concerns.
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and
Transportation Commission receive public comments, discuss all options
and concur with staff's recommended options.
Laurie Troudy, 1329 Holly Leaf Drive, teaches at Chaparral, D.B. High and
Maple Hill schools. She pointed out on the map that on Spruce Tree coming
off of Mountain Laurel cars are parked along the street in the way of the right
hand turn traffic. in order to make aright turn she must remain in the left
turn lane until she gets passed the parked vehicles. She pointed out that
about one in 10 vehicles is turning left off of Spruce Tree onto Mountain
Laurel from the right turn lane. If a stop sign is installed at this location, the
traffic will back up at Diamond Bar Boulevard and vehicles will cut through
Diamond Gate. She strongly recommended a left -turn light on Diamond Bar
Boulevard at Mountain Laurel Way in order to mitigate U-turns, vehicles use
of property owners' driveways for turnarounds, etc.
Steve Tye, Chinook Place, said he appreciates the alternate route
suggestion for sixth graders. It took him two trips to Chaparral to seek out
alternate routes. He believes Maple Hill is being heavily used. To Mrs.
Troudy's point, no U-turns all the way up to the cul-de-sac at the end of
Spruce Tree does not necessarily serve a purpose if people are going to use
driveways for turnarounds. He recommended a no left turn at the
intersection of Ironbark and Spruce Tree which will relieve the problem at the
top of Spruce Tree. Further, circulation would improve if all 40 residents
came out the top of Aspen Knoll and turned right on Ironbark. By taking
away the ability of the traffic to turn left from Ironbark onto Spruce Tree, the
problem is solved,and the homeowners can make the right turn onto '
Ironbark which makes them part of the solution and not part of the problem.
He commended staff for their effort and recommendations.
Wally Tallant, 1428 Spruce Tree, leaves his house at about 7:00 a.m.
weekdays and at that hour the school traffic is already backed up. Some
mornings he is unable to leave his driveway due to the congestion so he
waits until 8:00 a.m. to leave. Last night at about 11:30 p.m., a 21 year old
motorist lost control of his vehicle traveling up the hill and knocked down his
brick wall. The motorist was cited for DUI. It is not legal to make U -Turns
using private driveways. When he comes home at 3:00 p.m., cars' are lined
up along the street in front of his driveway.: In speaking with school staff
members who direct traffic, he learned that they have no training to direct
traffic. He feels that stop signs would help the situation.
t
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE 3 T&T COMMISSION
C/Leonard moved, C/Morris seconded, to concur with staff's five (2, 3, 4, 5 &
12) recommended options with emphasis on Item #15. During discussion,
the Commissioners expressed the view that.a left turn signal on Diamond
Bar Boulevard at Mountain Laurel Way should be considered and that staff
may wish to include potential costs for such an installation in their report to
Council.
DPW/Liu said that the Commission may wish to consider this matter further
since the traffic problem consists only of two -fifteen minute periods during
a.m. and p.m. weekday peak school hours. He suggested to the
Commission to implement the tier 1 - first five improvements, continue to
observe the conditions, and evaluate the mitigation measures at the end of
six months. In general, the cost of a left turn signal installation could range
from $50,000 to $100,000.
Following discussion, the motion was carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kung, "Leonard, Morris, VC/Istik,
Chair/Virginkar
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: None
VII NEW BUSINESS:
A. Navajo Spring Road Traffic Concerns:
AE/Ilasin presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and
Transportation Commission concur with staff to install a Right Turn Warning
Sign with supplemental 15mph advisory speed plate at approximately 23603
Decorah Road and install a 15 mph advisory speed plate atthe ,existing Left
Turn Warning Sign located approximately at the property line of 227 and 231
Navajo Spring Road, and to consider oneofthe interim measures as
recommended by staff, and (3) review and discuss the current Speed Hump
Policy for the City of Diamond Bar.
Ray Hallenbeck, 208 Navajo ,Spring; Road, said that according to the city
attorney's opinion paper regarding speed humps, it states that he does not
oppose speed humps. Neither is the Sheriff's Department opposed to speed
humps. Those in attendancetonight who live on Navajo Spring favor speed
humps. He does` not agree with staff's recommendation that speed humps
be placed only on straight roadways of less than five percent grade. He
believes with sufficient signage a speed hump could be placed on the
downhill section on Decorah Road before the turn at Navajo Springs. In
addition, a speed hump could also be placed at the curve and another speed
hump at the end of the turn so that both southbound and northbound traffic
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE 4 T&T COMMISSION
would be forcedtoslow down at the curve. The Sheriff's Department issued
a citation recently for 50 mph at the curve. The speeding is getting worse
and the sheriff's department cannot be on the street all day. He believes
that the portable speed humps make a lot of sense.
Iry Rem, 221 Navajo Spring Road, has lived in his home for 34 years. He
appreciates the city's efforts with the stop sign on upper Decorah. He
believes in accident prevention and he believes the temporary speed hump
would be the most prudent solution. He is retired and is frequently in his
front yard. The neighborhood has cycled back to young families which he
believes has increased the risk factor on this curve. He urged the
Commission to give serious consideration to the safety factor. He agrees
that a preventivemeasure needs to be placed on Decorah Rd. before
vehicles reach Navajo Spring. He thanked the Commission for their
consideration and urged them to consider the temporary speed hump.
Samuel Guillaume, 505 Navajo Spring Road, said that by the time vehicles
reach his driveway they have gained significant speed. He is very concerned
about the safety of his family and kids who cross the street to go to the club
house. He has had many close calls backing out of his driveway. Most of
the time he tries to reach home when the traffic is light so that he can safely
back into his driveway andnotbe at risk when leaving his home in the
morning. He recently visited a city that had temporary speed humps and
thought to himself at the time that this was the remedy needed on his street.
Shortly after that visit,- he signed the petition for tonight's meeting. He
strongly urged the Commission to do whatever it takesi to slow down traffic
and make Navajo Spring a safer place for everyone to live and walk.
Robert Huff, 441 Navajo Spring, commended staff for seeking a.method of
trying speed humps on a trial basis. He recommended against installation of
Botts dots because of the noise factor. He believes that speed humps would
be useful tools to calm neighborhoods on streets such as Navajo Spring and
other collector streets. taw enforcement` cannot be in all places at all times.
Therefore, a mitigationmeasure such as a temporary speed hump may be
an effective tool. He urged the Commission's consideration.
Mary Lewandowski, 23524 Decorah Road said she has lost two or three cats
on the street. She offered to have enforcement use her driveway to observe
the traffic. She is concerned 'about the families with young children and
something must be done about the speeding vehicles.
Dolores Vallejos, 23858 Navajo Springs Road, said she is very excited that
the Commission is considering temporary speed humps. She has lived at
her residence more than 12 years. Within five months of moving into her
house she and her young children were in their van getting ready to pull
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE 5
T&T COMMISSION
away from the curb when they were hit by a young man who failed to stop.
When deputies are present ithelpsto slow the traffic but they cannot be
present at all times. The neighborhood really needs speed humps. There
are classes for youth ages 3 to 17 at the clubhouse. Children must cross the
street to get to the clubhouse and it is extremely dangerous for them.
People are held hostage in their homes and she would be very grateful if the
city would finally give the neighborhood some help with this matter.
Ken Shaeffer, owns both 407 Navajo Spring where he lives and 415 Navajo
Spring. He has a 19 month old son. He teaches at D.B. High School. He
has hived in Diamond Bar since he was one year old. When he moved into
his home seven years ago there were no children on the street. In the last
three or four years, six to eight houses have sold and suddenly there are
many children. He lives in the middle area of the street and vehicles reach
peak speed in front of his home. Three years ago someone rolled his car
down the street. The car came to a stop in front of his driveway. It is a very
scary situation and anything the city can do to slow the vehicles down will be
greatly appreciated. He wants a safe environment in which to raise his
children.
C/Morris pointed out that the traffic in the area is neighborhood traffic and
not cut -through traffic. He believes the homeowners association should be
approached to assist in educating the neighborhood. He likes staff's
recommendation for the 15 mph speed sign. He proposed a portable raised
speed hump for the area in front of rthe clubhouse. He also suggested red
curbing the area across from the clubhouse.
C/Kung said he would Eike use of portable speed humps authorized,
locations to be determined between staff and residents.
C/Leonard said she would concur with staff's recommendation for 15 mph
advisory speed plates and she is definitely in favor of portable speed humps
as a pilot study project. She asked for explanation of "temporary" in this
instance and suggested placement of more than two speed humps, one of
which would be placed between the addresses of 208 and 217 Navajo
Spring.
VC/Istik used Pepper Tree Court in ;Brea as a good example of a street that
uses speed humps. In addition, the street has several warnings signs
indicating 15 mph on the pavement. The signs are unavoidable. He
believes a similar design for Navajo Spring would be appropriate. He also
believes that it would be helpful to have the petition signed by the person
who initiated the petition, and that it should point out the benefits as well as,
the negative impacts. He said he would support permanent or temporary
speed humps.
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE 6 T&T COMMISSION
Chair/Virginkar said that as a part of this project he would like for staff to
provide feedback regarding enforcement. He concurs with staff's
recommendation to install 15 mph advisory speed plates: Regarding speed
humps, some law enforcement officials believe that speed humps have a
temporary effect. Once the drivers get used to the speed humps they will
use them as launch ramps which could cause unexpected negative results.
Currently, the city has a "no speed hump" policy. Therefore, prior to
installation of temporary or permanent speed hump installations, the city will
have to revisit and revise its policy and criteria. Another issue brought up by
the city attorney was the matter of residents indicating they did not wish
speed humps used as a law enforcement device and that it should be more
of a roadway design feature. It is understandable that if this was a new area
of development being discussed and that speedhumps were installed as
roadway design features, it would be acceptable. However, after -the -fact
speed humps may be perceived as traffic' enforcement devices which may
cause the city to wrestle with liability and other, issues. As a result, he is
reluctant to recommend installation of speed humps at this time. He would
have no problem with Botts dots which have noise problems.
DPW/Liu said that regardless of a pilot project, a uniform and consistent
policy must be adopted citywide. A pilot project will provide the city more
information and data regarding adoption and implementation of a citywide
policy. Staff would recommend that a petition must be signed by a majority
of the residents between Sunset Crossing Road' and Briar Creek Road. The
information received from California cities that have initiated portable speed
humps is that the minimum support must be from 65 to 75 percent. In
addition, there are current standards that need to be passed along to the
Commission, Council and residents. The latest information was compiled in
1995-1996. At this point, staff is aware of only one city, Santa Monica, that
has used temporary speed humps. Chino Hills looked at this particular
device and decided not to implement temporary speed humps. Under a pilot
program, the city has an opportunity to experiment and compile data.
Ultimately, if it is in best interest of the city not to have speed humps, it is
a matter to be decided by the City Council. Even for a pilot project, a city
must have standards and procedures in place regarding the project and the
residents must understand the basis for and nature of the process.
C/Leonard moved, C/Morris seconded, to adopt staff's recommendation to
install`a 15 mph advisory speed plate at approximately 23603 Decorah Road
and install a Right Turn' Warning Sign with supplemental 15 mph advisory
speed plate at the existing Left Turn' Warning Sign located approximately at
the property line of 227 and 231 Navajo Spring Road and request staff to
initiate a pilot study regarding possible installation of portable speed humps
in the Navajo Spring Road/Decorah Road area. The study will recommend
criteria for a city-wide policy regarding speed humps. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
JULY 12, 2001
PAGE 7
T&T COMNIISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS Kung, Leonard, Morris, VC/Istik
NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ChairNirginkar
ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: None
B Request to Keep Clear at Brea Canyon Road and Gerndal Street.
AE/Phillips presented staff'sreport. Staff recommends that the Traffic and
Transportation Commission concur with staff to have the necessary repairs
made to the traffic signal at Brea -Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive
and then conduct an investigation to see if the access problem at Gerndal
Street still exists
VC/Istik moved, C/Leonard seconded, to concur with staff's recommendation
to have the necessary repairs made to the traffic signal at Brea Canyon
Road and Golden Springs Drive and then conduct an investigation to see if
the access problem at Gerndal Street still exists. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kung, Leonard, Morris,VC/istik,
ChairNirginkar
NOE&COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
VIII STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTIONS ITEMS: DPW/Liu stated that the
D.B./Walnut Sheriff's Station has a public safety committee that meets monthly.
Thecommitteeis comprised of members from the cities of D.B., Walnut and from
the unincorporated area of Rowland Heights. Matters of traffic concerns, crime
issues, etc are regularly discussed. One of the items featured in their recent
minutes is the concern for speeding on Navajo Spring Road and Decorah Road and
the fact that motorcycle cops were sent to the area and five speeding citations were
issued. DPW/Liu said that he would like to have the Sheriff's Department report to
the Commission on their direct response to resident's complaints.
IX ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: C/Morris would like staff to take a look at
the corner of Navajo Springs and Sunset Crossing Road area for possible red
curbing,
ChairNirginkar reiterated Mr. Tallant's concern regarding double parking on Spruce
Tree near Chaparral which is a major problem during peak school hours. He asked
staff to look at potential solutions.
Deputy St: Amant said that the same problem exists at Quail Summit Elementary
School. Cars are not really double parked, they're just waiting in-line. As a result,
they cannot be cited for double-parking. Other than improving the traffic flow there
is little that can be done.
JULY 12, 2001 PAGE S T&T COMNIISSION
X ITEMS FROM STAFF:
1. Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update: June 2001 - Report by Deputy St.
Amant.
2. Monthly School Citation Update: June 2001 - Report by Deputy St. Amant.
XI INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
A. Fire Department Request for Flashers on Armitos Place - Report by
AE/Phillips.
2. Fountain Springs Road Neighborhood Traffic Management Study Report by
DPW/Liu.
3. Country View II On-Street Parking Request - Report by DSA/Smith.
4. Future Agenda Items - Report by DPW/Liu.
XII SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY EVENTS:
As agendized.
{
ADJOURNMENT:
Upon motion by C/Leonard, duly seconded and there being no further business to come
before the Traffic and Transportation Commission, Chair/Virginkar adjourned the meeting
at 10:14 p.m.
Respectfully,
f s / David f r.i i,
David G. Liu
Secretary
Attest:
Isl Aran Vir"inkar
Chairman Arun Virginkar
JULY 10, 2001 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the planning Commission
approve Development..Review;`No. 20.01704(1) and Minor Variance No. 2001-09(1),
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed.within the resolution.
David Catlan, applicant's agent, said he didnot believe the parking would be an issue
inasmuch as the center is not as heavily parked during the weekend. Mr. Akbar has agreed
not to open his restaurant to the public until` 11:30 a.m, on Saturday and Sunday. 'Mr.
Akbar stated he would not enter the premises on Saturday or Sunday until 11:00 a.m.
C/Tye asked why the applicant would need to -enter the premises at 10:00 a.m. to begin
serving the. public' at 5:30 p.m. on weekdays and only need to enter the premises '/z hour
before opening on Saturday and Sunday.
David Catlan, 2 speaking for Mr. Akbar, responded to C/Tye that the reason he arrives early
(during the week)' is to take reservations and only he and possibly one other person would
be at the restaurant during that time.
Chair/Zirbes opened the public hearing.
Peggy Guess, 2020 Brea Canyon 'Road s#A5, asked who enforces the restrictions and if there
is a violation who can she call to report the incident.
Chair/Zirbes referred Ms Guess to the City's Code Enforcement officer, Al Flores.
Chair/Zirbes closed the public hearing;
C/Kuo recommended that the operating hours on Saturday and Sunday begin at 10:00 a.m.
for uniformity.
David Catlan explained that the food for the catering portion of the t usiness is prepared on-
site and taking to other locations for consumption. He plans to }:ave four people at the
location on the weekends to prepare food for the catering portion of the business, which is
almost entirely the weekend business.
Chair/Zirbes said he believes the resolution should focus on the hours of operation when
the restaurant is open to serve the public to wit: 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m Monday through
Friday and: 11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on .Saturday. and Sunday,
VC/Ruzicka moved, C/Nelson seconded, to approve Development -Review No. 2001-04(1)'
and Minor Variance No. 2001-09(1), Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed
within the resolution subject to the following: The hours of operation when the restaurant
is open to serve the public shall be from 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
t
W
4 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
HEARING BOARD ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D.
21865 Copley Drive
MAY 24, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Hull called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Hull.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Hull, Vice Chairman St. Amant, and Commissioners
Finnerty and Torres.
Commissioner Anis was excused.
Staff: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services; Gary Olivas, Recreation
Superintendent; Dorothy Schmid, Senior Coordinator, and Marisa
Somenzi, Administrative Secretary.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: Grace MacBride spoke about the way tennis
courts are handled. She said she does not believe that Diamond Bar has to abide by the County's law
regarding private instruction. Actually, the courts should be locked and people who want to be
members of the Tennis Association of the City of Diamond Bar should have to pay for a key, and a
membership card. The card could be placed on a board when members want to engage in play.
Currently, tennis courts are used for skateboarding and in-line skating, etc. The court finish is very
delicate and refinishing is expensive. There are no monitors present at tennis courts. Members of
the association could volunteer to monitor the courts. With keys there should be no concern. If
someone loses their key or gives it to a non-resident, they can be barred from using the courts.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
C/Finnerty moved, VC/St. Amant seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented.
Without objection, the motion was so ordered with C/Anis being absent.
1.1 Approved Minutes of April 26, 2001 Regular Meeting of the Parks & Recreation
Commission as corrected.
1.2 Recommended to the City Council the adoption of the "July is Parks and Recreation
Month" Proclamation. C/Finnerty recommended that the phrase "People, Parks and
Programs" be included in the Proclamation.
MAY 24, 2001
2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
2.1 Recreation Program Update.
PAGE 2 ' PARKS & REC COMMISSION
RS/Olivas reported on the following items:
1. Youth and Adult Sports
2. All City -Wide Youth Track Meet
3. Youth Baseball
4. Youth Indoor Soccer
5. Adult Basketball
6. Adult Volleyball
7. Adult Softball
8. Contract Classes
9. Tiny Tots
10. Adult Excursions
11. Concerts in the: Park
12. Day Camp
13. Youth Excursions
14. Volunteen Program
2.2 Recreational Trails and Bicycle Route Master Plan Update - CSD/Rose reported
that on May 15, 2001 the City Council approved the document.
2.3 Diamond Bar Community Foundation Report Chair/Hull.
2.4 Parks Report - CSD/Rose.
A. Schedule of Future Park Visits:
Park
Date
Time
Commissioner
Sycamore Canyon Park
6-14-01
8:30 a.m.
Chair/Hull
Maple Hill Park
6-21-01
9:00 a.m. '
C/Finnerty
Heritage Park
6-21-01
10:00 a.m.
C/Finnerty
Pantera Park
TBD
TBD
C/Torres
Peterson Park
TBD
TBD
C/Torres
Summitridge Park
6-28-01
9:00a.m.
VC/St. Amant
Paul C. Grow Park
6-28-01
10.00 a.m.
VC/St, Amant
Ronald Reagan Park,
TBD
TBD C/Anis
Starshine Park
TBD
TBD C/Anis
2.5 Park Facilities and Reservations Report SC/Schmid
C/Finnerty suggested that more trees are needed at Starshine Park.
MAY 24, 2001 PAGE 3 PARKS & REC COMMISSION
VC/St. Amant recommended using the same type of trees as the English Springs Park,
in Chino Hills. Trees are needed as a barrier between the park and residences to set
it apart.
C/Finnerty also recommended installation of a picnic shelter.
2.6 Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) CSD/Rose
a. Sycamore Canyon Park Landslide Repair Work in progress scheduled to be
complete by next week.
b. Peterson Park Drainage Correction - Work to begin in the Summer.
C. Sycamore Canyon Park ADA Retro -fit - Under review
2.7 City's 12a' Birthday Party - Results of the City Council Subcommittee evaluation
meeting of this event - CSD/Rose reported on the success of this year's event. The
13th Birthday Party is scheduled for April 21, 2002.
4. NEW BUSINESS:
4.2 Request from Mr. Simon Cohen fora facility site for a Table Tennis Club.
W. Cohen detailed his request. He presented a petition to the Commission.
Chair/Hull asked how many tables would be required and how large a facility is
desirable.
Mr. Cohen responded that with a minimum 3 tables that the Heritage Park location
could accommodate the club. Each table costs approximately $1,000. Paddles and
balls are usually provided by the players.
VC/St. Amant suggested that Mr. Cohen look into the possible use of a commercial
facility such as the vacant Ralphs location in the Country Hills Towne Center.
Mr. Cohen indicated that play usually takes place in the evening hours and on the
weekends between 5:00 or 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 or 9:00 p.m.
Chair/Hull asked Mr. Cohen to provide him with a=list of table tennis rules.
Following discussion, Chair/Hull appointed C/Finnerty and C/Anis to serve on an ad-
hoc committee to consider Mr. Cohen's proposal.
4.1 Report on Soda Machines in the City's Parks - Report by CSD/Rose and
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission receive staff's report,
review information provided by the Coca-Cola representative and recommend the
following to the City Council:
w MAY 24, 2001 PAGE 4 PARKS & REC COMMISSION
1. Authorize the, use of cages around the soda machines in the City's parks to
help reduce vandalism.
2. Require operating dollar validators on all soda machines installed in the City's
parks, prior to the extension of the contract.
3. Recommend the extension of the contract with Coca-Cola with the inclusion
of the preceding items 1 and 2, for the period of August 1, 2001 through July
31, 2002.
Selena Robinson -Kruse, Coca-Cola representative, provided details on future plans
for soda machines in the Diamond Bar parks.
Following discussion, C/Finnerty moved, VC/St. Amant seconded, to recommend that
the City Councilapprove renewal of the contract in accordance with staff's
recommendations. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Finnerty, Torres, VC/St.' Amant,
Chair/Hull
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Anis
RECESS: Chair/Hull recessed the meeting at 9:35 p.m.
RECONVENE: Chair/Hull reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
3. OLD BUSINESS:
3.1 Consideration of Fee for reserved use of Skate Park -
C/Finnerty moved, C/Torres seconded, to continue discussion of this item to June 28,
2001. "Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Finnerty, Torres, VC/St. Amant,
Chair/Hull
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Anis
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Torres commented that the left turn signal on southbound
Diamond Bar Boulevard to Eastbound SR 60 is over the #1 lane instead of over the left turn
lane.
VC/St. Amant asked the status of the roller hockey courts.
CSD/Rose responded that the matter of the roller hockey courts is on a wish -list for the
2001/2002 Fiscal Year budget and has not been recommended by management staff to be
included in the budget that goes to the City Council on Tuesday, June' 5.
VC/St. Amant reported that the owner of the roller hockey courts said "make me an offer" and
%4 A X7 IA '711AI PAGE 5 PARKS & REC COMMISSION
he believes the city could take advantage of a good opportunity. He believes the city needs
to move forward on acquiringtD additional land.
CSD/Rose stated that all of the Commission's recommendations for land acquisition to be
used as potential parks were forwarded during the City budget process.
VC/St. Amant expressed concern about the way the trees were planted on Gold Rush and
Diamond Bar Boulevard. It looks like a tree farm and is very unattractive.
CSD/Rose explained that the area is landscaped to prevent casual use.
ADJOURNMENT:
C/Finnerty moved, VC/St. Amant seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no other business
to come before the Commission, Chairman Hull adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Isl Bob Rose
Bob Rose
Secretary
Attest:
Isl Jeff Hull
Chainnan Jeff Hull
Cl 1"Y OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated August 21, 2001 have been
reviewed, approved, and recommended for—payment. Payments are
hereby allowed from tete following funds in these arriount
FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID ,:VCiL,...,,s-.__RS TOTA._..
001. G C.t%AEF s-+._. FUND 150,533.03 1391999.0_100,531.09
112 FaP_i i.Trl liFUND 62,523.29
.s_6_lvrvr60,804.58
115 l(-EG-A_1WASTE
y_EMi . FUND
VD } 3,548.75
L/J l_5T:5
EIPt6.:x'xi (=C' l :�FW 14.86, 14.86
1. i _ CO--! SB EV iL.:'.. GRANT -^FUND f 5 -,25
1 50 5,629.50 ,6n_'0
}t CITIZENS OPT-PUBLIC S ^t 0 1,632.57 1,632.57
2,14S.29 2,141.29
141. LL AD #41. r-:1-IND .00 12,002.12 12 002.1.
i + 1 dL ' 1. r,.: F., .t ti Y_t iFt i'. - k =C •7C
....._t ..+ ,.._ . xF ;. . . �{-- ....1 3: �- { A ,1; k k ,Cl tJ - i" i.a=xYt._�. x= �=4�x# a_..? 1.., --15.91. 251,785.91
t I � r., 11 3: 77 E Ft S t5` "' _429,210.24 - 642,266n50
F ik__ x._�. i i" x..l v i"SL..J.._ [_z { � .s:_ 1 _. y"0 v.+... . .:. y ..'- ,.
APPROVED BY:
a
FiKancE Director Mayor
V ' 1#
LAnda C. Lowry
` 2;
CITY : Or DIAMOND BAS'
RUN DATE. 08/1.6/2001 07'53.03
4'O';ICHER REGISTER
PAUE'
I
DUE THPU* 08/21/2001
PREPAID
,11?t'D :ECT-ACCT-PFi"EUECT-A-ELT
PC t
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AP1DIN,
DATE CHECK.
AAFA, GLASS
0015350-42140--
RECREATTON REFUND
300.00
?S0TA
I'REPAIDL
.00
TOTAL AsL
VOA CHERS
300. 00
TOT AL
rE•.LE VENDOR
A33RIxfi.ssLTURA.L COMM. WGHTS c MEASURES
00153-311-42210—
1630
►FEES' ABATEMENT SYC CYN PK
2,849.46
1417,=4i 45519--
6113C
WEED ABATEMENT DIST 441
11, 66.68
W!e539-422+,£,--
163G
WEED ABATEMENT DIST #'39
5,839.02
TOTAL
PREPEIDS
. f3
TOTAL
VOUCHERS
26;505.!5
TOTAL
DUE'VENDOR
26,5535.1E
A IAV CTE" { G
>.,,z=v � ! �lAFHIC ISyC
0014:cO 412100--
11372
10541
ENGRAYINu—NAMSEPLATr
1aa0t
TOTAL
PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL
VOUCHERS
16.07
TOTS l
DUE VENIDGP
16.07
O)II N S PLLEN
11284E
CONTRACT GLASS -FY 01,01
1,191.00
03/21/2001 50890
'TOTAL
Pt:EPAIDS :.
1}2•Rt.00
TTWL
VOICHER3
.0E3
TOTA.?
DUE VENDOR .
1,201.00
35045
LSE POR -TPS -JULY 4 "&,,,,CPT
397.44
TOTAL
PRFPAIDS
.00
T OTAII
43L,CHvR :
;37.44 -
TOTAL
`A
DUCE VE R h#EU
?7:44
f o,
f -Vit__
1131_' �
RENTAL FY 01/02492,#146
}:
1,913.0.:
TOTAL
P'l(EPAIDu
.00
TOTAL
Ol UCHE"C,
Y
1,11°.OSS
7; OTAL
DUE VENDOR
AMERICAN AN r4,_.—,li;'.t.5, ..5r' LiT:rr.`si
a1'• ,a_..
8I D.'Ev E`LNINS EMM
410.00
TOTAL
PREPAIUS
O,AL
VEU.S„H..RS
TOTAL
DUE VEkNIDIOR
400 010
....;_AN, ART -r IN' C
ne n
IM82
24456
LOGO MUGS
152.11'
TEiT4L
FEEPAIDS
.00
-
TOTAL
VOUCHERS
151.11
.
S OTrEL
r r. 'i -.
: Y }� SG*
r.:
, 52. i €
hmi j ` IN
Er! G^ .� REFUNE sir.
t,t:
TOTAL
PREPAID=
.00
TOTAL
VU -1-11" E
CHERS
40.00
..
TUAL
r•
DUE
40.00
CITY OF %IA:�10"iii BAR
RL -#d DATE' lro/15, j220,01 07=53:03
VOUCHER'REGISTER
PARE. 2
D:IETH.i l' 08/21/2001
PREPAID
FUND/SECT-ACCT-PI?II,1ECT-ACT
00 #
INt;?DICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT 'DATE CHECK
CHP}ISTINE ANN' AN ELI
0015350-453' --
1125,7
CONTRACT GLASSES -SUMMER'
27.00 -'
TOTAL PRE PATI+S
TOTAL VOUCHERS
27.00
TOTAL U F, A)SN'DO
7.
Ell EEW ANSARI
0-0140,10-42330—
REIMB-LEAG IMNI 7/25-27
g4s _v
TOTAL PPERAID-5
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
9 6.A- -
T'sTAL Isi:1E 'YE;MBOR
%.66 '
A i�= ACC1u ANTS DIVERt 'A�.f
0014050. 1,100,--
11329
1:39351 TEMiP DiCS-MKBCD 7122/01
""9.50)
014050 ddi(1f•.^_ -
�'?,7
11.:2:
;.�5.?.rr i�j f» Ct�'I" F� h� '71`279,101
1 __ TEMP E.VCS-WK EQ
Ei� �(
6C•_._,7
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
1 dry. oo
TOTAL ISLE VEHB
1, 4u.ti
001-2"f'•'2--
51860 REFUND; FART: LEEP-REABAN FK
50.00
TOTAL PREPAII.S
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
50.00
- -
f PTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
h d i
::.
112722
4 97315 Tr P CS- MB 7` t 1
Cry -.n..._ , �M: 57:.E.d .t21tt.
K
51 .6
1ss72
CA 4 63-3.02 TEMP SWS-WKEV-1 7/281101
519.60:
r R 4
TEt°. 1{I:.S-C,M SV-W1E 7,'2'
,b,
15 5
TOTAL PREPAIBS
.00
TOTAL
TOT .aL L��E VENDOR
1,1'2.65
r
r
111
6742 ,t10
449.30
T R T. ,P "eC
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
-442,,3(?
T OF ARL DUE Efl! 0--h
44..?.
�0 _ 4-2.1 -_
? j1�.!01 LON.C.DIST C1HRroS-00MyM M :TG
17.34
t "1I 4x,25--
LONU TWIST CMRBS-SuzRaFF
1-3y�
11 _ _f.aF: 4_U5--
7114/01 LONE DIST CF G--COuMM/MKTG
14.&1
fl_4:: 4t�j--
7I1ot01 LONG GrP45-B1BC,STY
19.11IS
-
TOTAL Pt=�AILiy..
.011" : _ -
TOTAL VOUCHERS
45.50
TOTAL DUE VENMOF,'
.c5 50
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUM TATE: W11,116/2.301 07:513:03
VOUCHER REGISTER
PAGE: 3
DUE THPU: :-812112002
PREPAID'
FLItID'SECT-AECT-PRC�ECT-ACCT
PC '# INVOICE DESCIRIPTION AMOUNT
DATE CHECK
AT&T WIRELESS BEFI,'ICES
1254411-42125--
7!29101 CELL CHARGES-SOERIFF
.x_,.24
R:lr 1 1
00I .;E,�O-4i1�S--
1 4 {^{�JARDES- MANAGER
7129(01 EF_f.L WiI'ff taf_,� CI1Y �T;��1..f�ER
3
,0,91
00114415-42125—
7/29101 ,3 CELL Cts-f;Cf_SJOL PATROL
6. 67
0014090-42125--
7129/01 CELL CHARGES -POOL CARS
218.2
TOTAL PREPAIDS
,00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
:05
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
3•1;.05
BAUDIVILLE INT.
0014010-41-200—
113.74 769337 CC CERTIFICATESUPPLIES
101.55
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL 4:OUCHEPS
101.55
TOTAL BOE VENDOR
101.55
0': 34'�t -
RECREATION REFUND
35.00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.{
TOTAL VOUCHERS
35.00
TOTAL DOE VENDLOP:
35.00
BL M Lc- L.^t;, AD= S3f p m: P Li1'Ui. i
: e12200-
508232 BUFF c_
I=M1-K+tLSAT
f
+},C._.
' rf .
`5?v ;_..--
- t ,-
49614 SLFPLIES-PIItLI... Rri�
-,'
9.12
c.,. ;..>_.!--
5`s'Ywl:'. IiPPLiES-RECREA.TIJt��?
f7,iJ't
,.'
'31661 SL°PLIES-PEEREa? IO d
9.29
0.Cii1 .ti 4 1'22
t.10 15211
f3 6i.iri S teP`LIf S'-PLAd;.Nr
36. Do
r1 ..:,
377449 SUPPLIES-Gr�,tLAL,ER MEQ?:
-1104.,62
;.ti 4 -`;} ,'Lr, -;PL TES-S,..v :EvriA TOi?
113. 95
z
636v20 �1SU PPLFES-F3ME
r.
s. L.liv-T ?�EDt,,..!��Y'
s_ i
_
.19.5:: SU -PLIES -GENERAL
103.00
..., ... ,a�1•;-'
LO 2S2 ,r Ti F o -S _via,_i.:_.
_._,t�ir:2, �i:Ps-�IL_ G
1;2.t}4
y
567664 SUPPLIES-GE?,ERAL
5:.95
TOTAL P?EPAIDS
,r}r}
TT4�jt Fl[^t `>�+
.,..E i,7
n.
�..i vra.y
DUE WENDOR
0u' ,au yt'Li,_} AND EuAir, ,`TERS
f.i_.moi. 21_.J-_
GA? FEMIA `E(SC(,!tTF ON
a
255 R
v,.
TOTAL PREPAIDS
,±10
`
TOTAL VOUCHES
255.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
22 .420
r )A [� �cE
—_. EL
0,01 -24740--
REFUNDIOPE SET OF EPBES
100.00
TOTAL PPEPAII S
t
TOTAL VOUCHERS
100.(10
TOTAL BLEL '-ENIOR
1 T^.arj
L_: r,__'.--
rr p��r�c { + - IM -6/02
1�r 00
:OAL Pe EPA MS
.00
r
TOTAL
A Ve'dCHERS
165. i+%
TO",AL tDT`c
CITY OF LIANIOI ND BAR
RUN LATE 07:53:03
VOMiEF REGISTER
FACE: 4
DUE THRU,. 08121/2001
PREPAID
FLt4'D-:./S-c`l-ACCT-PR��EET-ACTT
pC #
Ilii IICE DESCRIPTION' AMOUKIT
DATE Ci4EC1?,
TINA CAFEY
00140010-42340—
11373
360 TEANEUILDINO WORKSH33P-811
750.00
TOTAL PREP IDS
TOTAL imoUCHERv
750.00
TOTAL DUES %rtNl.JDR
750.00
ICT- C 3
Fy!RsL.-1 uARv..,�iv
f Sir t--
. t7ECRES:ION FEFUIND
197.00
MMM PR -PAI -L ,
,tt}
_
TOTAL tDIC.R-RS
197.€00
TOTAL ??E VE"1DG
197.0-0
—S_v_tC1AaLJ INC
{0 2, _3,i0--
8043 PROF WCS-INSPECTION
15,1.0 0
TFT AlL F'PEPAIDS `
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
153.00
TOTAL DUE VEE, 0F,,
153.00
mu
DAY CANS' EXCUMION
416.55 08/21;2001 5C27y
TOTAL PREPAIDS
413,55
TOTAL MUCHEPS
.00
TI TAJ OU-- VEND Ox
413e505
L.i_�.'�i!
C , 47 ;,__
PECR3_VID41 REFUND
168.00
TOTAL PREPAID
.Qty
TOTAL VOUCHERS
168.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
168. 00
.n
11210
1104142441 UNFRIM RNTL-7/30/01
22.62
11:70
150416192 L`NFRM PNTL-016/01
22.62'
T�TAI PREPAIDS
X00
-1137, AL VOUCHERS
45.24
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
45,24
!A
RECREA ION REF
59.iYJ
TOTaL FRLPa?Yv
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
59,0
TOTAL LLE VEINIOR
59.E
R I Wf
;1015,=n 4t 2z .--
37604 KE'S-HERiTACH- PCOMM CTR
51.60
TOTAL FF:EPAIOS
.00
TOTAL Vaa.3Ct4us
51.60
t OTA! DUE VENDOR
51.60
F:1'11 UNITY C3_TrEAs- CE�.TEP
" •s•_•�--
REIME-BIDAY CELED
44.00
TOTAL PR'EPATDS
.O+CI
TOTAL VOUCHERS
43.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
GlTY OF DIAMOND BAR
PUN DATE.' 0811612001 O7:Ml'O,':
VOUCHER REDISTEG
FADE' 5
DuE TNRUa 0831/2001
FEEPAID
FL4i'r."r,zGT-ALGT-PRGL!ECT-ACCT
PO #
P01010ICE DESCRIPTION
AMIXT DATE
CSC
GO^� T RAGT LRS FUND
-�1�•_.v Ta.Ji_=
ruGA-M-STAFF30.
Or) 08/21 /21,101
50.8 r
0014415 -423
GGCA..<B;; :uL tPiLFt,z
'240. On, S,212001
5088.
-
TOTAL PR-:PnIDS. -
.2..0. QO -
.,
TGT�L IFW�,.S
TOTAL DUE GR
270 O
3-,
.a uPEFL DE' f'I V Y -,atl? ME
- - -
30407 LiE;'-VRY SVCS -GEN
TOTAL0011090-42121—
s. PA 1 L
n
TOTAL 'r?� HER3
TOTAL rE.It k,,EN .t?
Cb j4l r OF ORANy t
-yl �1t14`_
PF 14-15 SALARY ..ATTCH Lr-,ii� '1'f -tai
35:9.08 U;3/21/221001
50880
TOTAL PRtPAIDS
359.08
- --
TOTAL VOUCHERS
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
59 ,fir
D" n- %A',! � .. _. .0018..
-
- -
` E 00 -:
51766 €rF}r t - ;ft�1prif
50 yrs
TG,AL PELFnIDS
.01,
TOTAL 01�'!-t_ RS
50.00
rmy rgF'.':--n
?1°j1RECREATION BROCH", SVCS
L«.7
-_
»I:1e Cy fivICE RE {EC,T 1-.�R ��
- -
95.&9
oi
013:«s. }_w... t'.:
ILL t."Eli 'J
h 7h`_«
1.-1l.CA T{. Iv—PEr•,`.I3k.t 7'±L
TOTAL PRE PA.IL:
niy
T OT tl t)^jlat-HR
454 .19
TOTS l D �E VENO.
454.19
ti+�-B-BATTERIES GAM RA
P � 14
t_:c 8 fil
5 `;Ic
TOTAL , REPAIDS
139.5S
h.
TOTAL l'G;.r;zryERSrr,
T:i}TA;� E ,E uG
n= A pml
A_iq: '£t T EM t '- 3' a
PF 1 DENTAL FP At t(
i.,.c
s 21 • E,
r _
_
T Y
EG.�,L MI.EPAIBS
-
Tfi}rn} L OIDUCH RS
00
-
A A `: E Ety -
04-1
.i L:4--
y. a
PP 1;-15DENTAL LM 20
'Uf.. r'
1,468.72 081/21120011
z{8p•
TnTa- PREPAT'_t5
1,488.12
.
TOT` _ V01I PER'"
, fn?
- -
-
-
Trj'I ! il?_-t#t1T}'t
i L- A _ ,
uv ��..ir
- L.,.Cr•.ti
CITY'' OF DIAMCMD BAR
FUN DATE: Dr.jl6/2WI 07'53:x)^
VDUCHER I%EMSTER
PAGE: 6
DUE THR ' C8/21/ 2001
PREPAID
FUND,'SErT-AP-FRO ECT -R CT
PD #
ItdVCICE , DESC'RIPTIM
AMLt1`I DATE GlIECV
DEWAM LUNDIN 5 ASE CIATtS
2505510-46411-P.0295-46411
7014A
DB -015-10 ESGN MES-BREA CYN R04D
8,390.00
25i). 10 -4411 -15901 -Wil 11
i10771.
DA-027-4DESIGNi SVCS-C,/SPRNUS
10,9-0.()0
50"5510 -46411 -ROM -46411
D9 -".•15B-1 LIFE LANE": IMPRCVEMEINT5
11,0001.00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
31,3e4.00
TOTAL DUE NNL,0R
_?IIm t..Df BAR COM UNITY F)sCM-ATIDk
350-42-M-3•� -
REIMB-B/DAY CELEBPA T IOM
L,25
8 :.J
TOTAL PREPAIDS
C0
TOTAL VOUCHERS
26.25
TOTAL DUE ;}ENDO
i0o', 23002-_
M96 REF;1:�,D PARK DEP-SYC CYN
50. 00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL .YOUI.iiF7
rsf
50'. 00,.
T0 I DUE VzlvDCp
ett: 00.
DIANIOND BAR 'IMPROVEMENT AS-SOCTAT-101
r ,if. 4
a1
fr tRT IN PARI`..
45101,00
TOTAL PREPAID
.00
450.00
BB
L!. LFi.F:il iIP-- RN:.: :.a'. ?E.0 .11 v�.. vL ILLI.
-
_...
nC MTS -7/17/011
,rn
215.00
i. _;:1
-23V5 CSC f�V ._, •:,`i,f0i
250.00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VBUCIV PS
A65. 00
TOTAL DUE WETMCS.
465.00
` ^_
t M:.r11
O
aC-L-D1 MPIMi C3),'SC�` TBIC..
28.30
-t )
�� ��Jj f1_L F) -CO
1
r) 42-10--
JUL-01 FUEL-GENERAL
90.',-15
1Tr b EPAIDS,
.}
TOTAL �;OUC ERS
487..37
TOTAL tkL D)_'E dcNDv), -
487.07
1132K,
8111!01 DAY CAMP -JULY 01
5'31 _z.:f 0
TOTAL P,t k.PAIDS
.00
TOR A t I '} ,
7
TOTAL MIIE VENDOR
5, 3-3-Mg5D
D_v.._L AND
' `AMJ')EXCURSION-DA 8 —
2,106.000
,106.0i0-OW211Zi0l C {•Ll
TG.,,L Pp -ETI
.,:A,�.
2,106.0
m ns_ VOUCHERS
TOTAL .
.0(1
TOTAL DUE t,Er-JDUF`
^
, 108,00
CITi Ii7 I3iP ?t' ' BAR
RIIN DATE: 08/16J20101 07.53=03
WCHER REGIETER
PACE: 7
:'LE T%:R�: {lf /�i�Icd,I
PREPAUD
I r!lT: j,'�GL f -ACCT-F`Itf i L !-ACCT
f 53.. '!i
II�'XI CE -- 1EEK 1!" 1 1:i{y
A iOUNT ' ' L•i e E l=-
f,ti1J!•.
L'IVERQMIEL PARA—INC
iI 555° f_1527--
7/18/01 DI'nM �uRIDE L F_ try 3tira
14,2 1r90 �41/^i-G1L
50807
I1. - 9--
7/5/01 Li1i $;l RIDE 5/16-31/01.1
- ILyv 6,25229.C9C9 03!211,200"y
�11i087
I2`,L53 lam•. -
+ DIAMU,L FILES 6/1-I5r0I
I:y529.81 _ 1120 1
50887
A Y:.,.J,.`vv 4552'9--
7( _2807 D1AMQUIND. RIDE 511-15.1101
15,442.19 081-'1/?fl01
L
-
_
L5i0887,
TOTAL PEEPA I?'
1 �,5 j
TOTAL VOUCHERS -
.00
TOTAL DUE VE�.�` DOR
-L2,523.29
r�
-
DIANE D
a_' -`.1f
fi
. 4
TO r P!REPA1 DS
00
TAL OUq7.PI�-
La:
TLTA DUES i. CLtF._^R
Os : }T-
112j360 -4 ,..tl--
II099
012:.1.75 TRAN—PORTATION-DAY CAMP
1,446.34
t--- - rr-.-1'i--
`;1-r1
iaarl
tt<t_-•rr. *lREilu rff.}•"t+�(: EXCURSION '?.E,
2_2111 Y1,_ lliv.ff i!-si UPIM EXCUlva._s�{
.d.�.d. t>{
_
T?Ts,L PREPAID
.s
'
S:
TOTAL r E ,rE!r8H
5 71j.�9
y
7Is6f
20-01-14391, CONTRACT CLASS -FY. 01/
726.00-
-
Tr €.,L FR EMIL'
}
TOTAL VCUC HERS
116.00
n
T T9CL DUCE VENE10p
116,00
iLL.•T' __
.. J _ _ .
L s -;`, RECREA FLFdhr
,�-_L D
..
59. or)
-
T'STAL PREPA1DS ;
.00
TCT.,._ VOUChtRS
`9.00
TC1TAIL DUE VENDOR
- -
J�+�� a- il)
_:; ia_L�'_•'
592605,51�,_
a EXLF_55"AI_-ClTf - CLERK
12.Pt
-
L
5679-
7- EXFrEuv MAIL-vE�dEkAL
'' �-
8. S
59c6i}.�551 EY.PRLSS MAI PIIBi^,i!siirS
57.57
Toll AL FREPAIDE.
.vU
TOTAL. VOUCHERS
IN.25
,�j
TUTAL r!l3t VENDOR
r �9 a 2C
7 •� ^
1 /7 Ar CO FEE "VCO -SUPPLIES
4iJ �I- E
84.88
TOTAL FFEPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
e4.88
TOTAL DUE "VENDOR
84.88
=IF.: .._, 1C f: REA1 EST---, Su2w, it k-1
f i1:1n
MAFP;;71, neRB" A T! AvE
1,799.00
T tTAL rF'EPAIiw
.00
-
T[-PLVoLrLI.ERy
?,�ITAi DUE VENDOR
1,75-5.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
R{UP. DATE' 0811EI2101 07:53.03
VOUCHER REGISTER
PAGE' 8
DUE THRU. 03/21/2001
PREPAID
USECT-' [-rOJE4 -ACCT
LO #
rFJiRiilSti
INVOICE
j iR� CHECK
iiFU
VANESSA FLINT
VI -347L)--
44069*
RE -1 ..�. L
�"CREATIM FFFIi`r-M
..
15.00
TOTAL
PREPAIDS
Gr
'TOTAL
'VOUCHIERS
15.0
r7nE
T0TAL
-
DUE VE�,?;GR
-
S� St1E�1
EST. itER Gi 1 Y TAN
M-1-34780—
RECREATION REFUND
60.00
TOTAL
PREPAID
.t
T
T Al�TAL
! ur
VOUMERS
..
- 60.00
TOTAL
DUE ;ENMOR
6..00'
CHRISTOPHER [EINDREAL)
CE_1 • U*!i
.51.5119277?�
REFUND PARK DE`-5Ev CYN
�.v.!
TOTAL
FREPAIBS
eft,
TOTAL
110CRER5
530.001
TOTAL
WEEIN OER
5-11.00
-k E7 P.{.0 ' E r rxC LaTE -i7C'
r:��....L€�LE ><L HRCH E __.. i
- -
-
..-
05
i1 sj�:J.�.�!
-�
1` ,- n�
n
I4�i v{iITR
i"f�TLTi1.Lx71+i.t-•C/SR,
21A 344.010 -
a
s__s2$15-246-420-13 a_L::34�-46-442?._
Al t65v
1�962
ARCHCTRLvL ^ JCr ITr-'
n'1-20.00
TOTAL
P7RREPi-�UM
.00.0
TOTAL
M.111- -
50,!'_64'..0
TOTAL
L{„E '. 4,"R
510 264. ,;1
,
P }n
-.
t_4 :i--
v 41_40"
25
crF
PFO '11 -YO
3:'
7.94
.:: .
�
' LP BENIDEH-U"ETS
.y
,1.8.00(1014095-41400
TOTAL
PREPA1n5
.ta!
TU{AL
V7 UHt 23
1,Ph5.`?4
-TOTAL
DUE ._EVvvPi.... -
1,9:5.94
r E
# 1i1
42,645C�l'![fr
tl
Cr`C Pi -4',' . ri-rg
n(t C' ,
05516
426404
- rr.n SM CS -k ,.CTHI,d
- 3, 97 ,..12
4 _;_-
,
dr
42f�4
FROF.S F' S I ;�PECTIL'
�r,t .7
TOTAL
PREPAI'Arl
r� f
TOTAL
VOUC? IER
4,547. i«•
...•
T ETht
FCf�tL
DUE, 'VENDOR' - -
uJt- -
�°, X47 LC
.4_T .:L.1..
y.3.. t iy •
,, _ 4. 0--
s
1111_I
f
5:1 11
':ie+C Tt'_r- i' ;- T .i^^
•v , . L.�S r#L,.YLIC KEY ,ASS'
.y cn
54E,,.54
TUT -11L
i" PAIDQ -
. i�v .
TOTA
n
�'1T ICH;EFiv
;. c#
401.54
TOTAL
DUE VE'NDUR. -
540.54
}
e -
1 2. .6Z.
ASS -SU viG
3.
-,TIAL
-A
IDDS
.0.0
TO AL
V3U'_H,ZR=
0
T-
' . l...
CITY 4F I)IAIG RAP
RIS DATE: 08/16/2001 ci:52: 2
VOUCCHtR RErISTER
PAGE 9
DUEHEZU 08/21/20-01
PREPAID
Fi�eD/SECT-?CCT PROD CT -ACCT
PO #r'' 13d'.€DICE �.)ttC PTMN
MOUNT . IATE CHECK
CAROL HERRER
y0014010-42330--0014010-42330--FitlMB-LEAu
- CGidF 7/25-27
,•a,79
TOTAL PREPAID
IIC)t
'1071. WL VDUCHEKS
TOTAL DUE tOENDOR
3101;79
F7 �r.�j_T..,
LULIE C13,1ES
-
;
�� 47' r--
�,:!
�? 5;t RECREATIO�t REF�.�#I1
15. CIA
TOTAL
.00
tPREPAIDS
TOTAL VIRiv)'CHE
t
- 15.00
TOTAL DUE VE DUR '
15 .)C
HiITT MARKING
001400/0 4+.210--
7 p{ �}}�� ii �r.
169, 72 SIGN -Com SVICS
�(
.1. .00
TOTAL PREPAIOO
;GO
TOT 'VOUCHERS
R)
TOTAL LLE VENN Mu
22.00
FINK Hit]
RECREATIM R'EFi rI)
TTiTL
Cii
iPF,tEPuAIi
TOTAL ERS
06.00
r0r L DUE ' E><:r� , -
itiA�;�:L� V�la;sOP.
0 tit
I�t.C:�.
1 .fit. - r' 3 N Al 11RIN M r L%_.�.
.LL. F'_ z �..ii'S:-..t_vYz�lzi _
- i it1'4".g. i5"
PRn F SIX5-SC'LID IWST E
2,s4P,75
hr,=., F4
3-35.00
-t _L L `#-,. •_-
20SG i'RO. SlL<Ci:-ilJC.i: uIL
1,200.00
MAL RRFPAIDS
.00
TOTAL tJL) CHEFS
3 75
t- 8 ---; .
TOTAL ?LEE VENDOR
r
_ ,J..�. .t.T•J J:�_
It00..9vs SUPPLIES S
s"Jr;Tv TI s
,018.69
it0
1071,11L PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERE
-OT t,L I'LE 'k)ENfiDP.
07S. `
"m RIT T TRUST -457
: r --
F'° f �r- t cOTRIP-ALL LtF T �1 L € �t f
:! .
171050.057 r,
.,,G_!t•,,, .cu,�.;�[tC1 508?
v _
PP 14-15 PA"FULL DEDUCTI-JULY 2,1001
3192:!.108 ijfi/=1`��?O1 57
_
TOTAL PREPAII'"a
20,971.85
TOTAL VOUQAtRS
.Ox)_
TOTAL. DUE VENDOR
20,971,85
T f t,T Q m T.7
aui zv
-
-..
,,..' "..'_._.
4044 SiGNIA'GE PUBLI!_ HEARDI
297,00,
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VI,' UC RS
?' .00
TOTAL OL?E 'VENDOR
297 fifi
CITY OF MAMaOM BAR
RLN DATE: X81'16:/2 )1 07153:(x^_.,
}t1UCKR REGISTER
PACE: Iia
DUE THRU: 08121/2001
PREPAID
FLF-1LI,'SECT-At,CT FROJECT-RC4T
Po #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION.
AMOUNT
?ATE CHEM
INDUSTRY EQUIFMFN;T RENTALS
0015350-42140--
10890A
235948 FENTAL-WMDENI FLOOR
M5.16
Ll --
1(h "�aR
c•� ? FEI+tTRi- EP FLOOR
360.00
00155350-42140--
108190
237881 RENTAL -MODEM FLOOR
90.00
TOTAL RR=FAIE'S
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
655.16
TOTAL. Luc VENDOR
E55.16
St,..n: ,l Er IRE-SMACES
-rs -
11—J3-4rz r1
112: -
41v,
-
"?tEICRS -L.FED RSF�r%} P.
4. .0
nay „5n 4`_a --
{,�:'
�:
1_,; E CFStd-LR FED Rett I"I:
av-�v
4szra.C1,
?'OTT FF:EFAID
4J•: 00
-
T"Tft V
: � t „L kGT:yF:ERS.
930.00
TOTAL DUE VE I! OR.
93•..1 C
„ ' ? -
f u4844 LEC�L RIi-FPL 2001-24
145.00
z-� 1_4, 1 s--
1h7j 56 DBE ANNUAL iL FLRN €Y ?11122
56.22
00 ) ,t 4-1, --
11.335
4615 An—PTD-GSTMP
58.81
1335
1060145 AD -ELECTION 11106101
72.00
fa tty:;}rt 4 1s__
1 5
1'._x8.:5 FUR Hr:G-LLEB3
59,00
,, 115--
.,1�
4;1Q29 Ar! -ET IS-EICR STREEt�T5CAFE'
68c68c.00.�
3 ; r
11.35
499012 AD -BM -AREA SLURRY
64.0,--
.K-,: 5
1 2LAD-WICCA VACANCY
34
TO FREPAIEtti
-TOT A,rL--i,Ca �`�� -
�
5 -56.00
TOTAL I'v= VEMMOR
556.00
_
_. _`--
t Z J.,
# /24 inI LEASc HUGUS 01
19,774.95
TO FREFRIuS
. OD
V
TG...L VOUCHERS
19.774.95
TOT Al E VT DOR
l�19,774.9595
51953 REFUND PARK. DEF-F'E,ERS9NI
r
TOT.4L FREPAIDS
+fl y
0
TG. AL VOld .Ftt:.,
50.00
TOTAL SLE VENDOR R
50.00
r n R JRFhI-sr r�'j:Ci
..e_..r. gin=
-
_
}t:=-
11. a=;
CLtNTFt(T'CLRSS-ff 01/02
84.08
TOTAL FIEFAILS
.8
TOTAL VOUCHERS
84.00
TOT13L DUE VENDOR,
54.00
CITE OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: Ce/16/20011 07=5:::123
VDADEP FEGISTER
PAGE: 'Al
DUE T.HRU". 08871/200/
FkUNDISECT-ACCT-PRU- CT -ACCT
Pt #
INAY` ICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
JEwitis HriGIN, LLP'
0G14121 44{}1k::--
JULY 01 LEGAL Sf'CS`FT.'i�ANICE 71011
i3i.5l+
y ea•.n s
"�•14w2C'-44tiv--
-.
JULYi1 CEN LEGL SVCS -sULY Il
R ,iVL1afd)
_4421--
JULY 01 iEl7/!1
S1C"'0r14
IE:,Ut
1014020-441::1-_
JULY 11 LEGAL SVCS -COM SVCS 7/11
351.00
JULY of LEGAL SVCS -FCB IWY5 7/01
648,0?
12,5215-440W- ,5215-44001--
i U L ? 11 LEGAL FVCJ CES -u 7111
y 7.0Cj
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.t}
DT-t'L VOUCHERS
4,320M,
hy �.
TOTTAL. DUE VENDOR
4,3 M,0!(}
—
JOBS AVA]lABLE
f _ rM -
AM -ADMIN �r:rcETA11
119. 60
00110. 42:15__.
1141D3,55 Mu AD -IAV SVCS ASST
1E5 60 _
T -T L fflc ' 7D4
}k,
TOTAL sOlUC�EF_3
285.20
TOTS;,_ DUE VENDOR;'
285e1C
1� _. R'{ � z �1r..-�L�.ESON ., . _, r °c
fii.T.z,,.:•,
1.1rit 1
AUGUST ELS n TTVESVCS-AUG :.
3,1ts.J,,: _
TGTAL FREPAIDS
00
TOTAL V 0 U Y`
-,,oro [fin
TRTl AL DUE }rat1 OR
z, coo. ooa .1rj
—f�
VTrP
C''' 4._- i1-_
11346
-- SR•C t"-IGJtt�Ei iEiF, 8/0',-08/02
!0E•`
!.
kOTA>_ FR ErA_Eka
+
TOTAL VOUCgEES
�R� . �)•
TOT IL IDUE VFND R
396.00
_`..EAU ILL' r rr1.;�i
vJ
_ _,?,_E
CSA_,.J
-
48
r ._
3VT!-'L P:TLYyyiiv
*J'
TOT AL F: uI t w pS
489. 00.
TOTAL DUE VEINDIOR
43..11
Kv,,>,rkttE ,,n;;F.,Fw CEINT.=FS
11M
41 I11RIrCrtc - V;PT?L
1 ,
�3.2J
+'x;14415 41_,=?--
11290
462 UNIFORMS. - V/PAT€OL
144.45
TOTAL PFEPAIDS
.00
TOTAL 'VOUCHERS
272.71
TOTAL DUE VE1,4DOR
272,70
DERRY ,FAR
11115
77 _41 ESC R�IC1? -G ,1 CAI p 7,11
991;50
TOTAL PyRiEEPAIDS
s00 '
TGF L . L _ ,L.
" -
91.51
TOTAI DME VENDOR
9011.50
VICTORIA KOROL
O .2_3478 ;__
-
4? ='7 FECFF A
ATION FEFUvIk
J i.
TGTAL PREPAIUv
TOTAL VOUCHERS :
351. or,
TONAL :TLE VENDOR
,,,1s
CITY CF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE= 08111511=001 07;53.
VEWICHER REGISTER
PASE. 12
0€JE THFU: 08121/2001 -
FREFAII
HEIR ISEET-11;01111-FYojECT-ACCT
PC t
INVOICE DENCRIPTiCN
AMOUNT DATE GI FEr:
JONATHAN W KRAUS
00153W-457300—
113317
CCk; T RkLT _ CLASS FY OI P-32
619.2;
TOTAL PREPA?I
e 0
TOT AL VOI CHEF[B
TOT AL DUE i VENDOR
519.2.10
0 _521;1 44110--
v va.e
6/1_,26101 PLNG COM" NTG-6,1.:,261101
130.00
TOTAL- PREPA I DS
, CIO
TOTAL V'OUCRERS
130.0110
TOTAL DUE VENIDOP
11710. Of"
01535 45300 _
1iC_:�€
CONTRACT CLA-M—SL11t1LR
252
TOT€;L PREPAID
.00
TOTAL VOUrXES
252.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
252.00
fn€NTY F-E;ilr' RAR. E:EL'G ._G`
u!t4"" ;a.ja•_--
VTC. -C CLR: 4: ASST CLF
44.00'
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.a)
TOTAL VO`OCHERS
44.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
44. DO
£ r T
..
41„409 41401--
1104E
1097402 SUPPLIES - Sr;IRTuIHATS
595.7'.
t it C.
1111714
8 62 t AGSt SUPPLTES - B^
2,006 .1,
TOTAL PF'.EFAIDS
00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
2,702.90
TOTAL DUE VENDOR.
2,70:.9'Qt
LLAu-L np rA r TsP�
?767 GRASSROOTS NET'r!K START -OF
2,2132.00
3TAL PRErAl
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
2,232.00
TUTAI AI i U':E VENDOR
2, 2 _ f �'0
Lrr c � ' t _��t
.
-
076r,-_
REL REFUND
262. 00
TOTAL PREPAII€S
,00
TOTAL ' VI€UCHER•E
m?- 0o
TOTAL WE. ,'E� DOR
2111 .00
E. CC.
r� r k;- U
440. RECR_'i,TTON ..0.11 D
50.010
TOTAL PREPAID
.00
TOTAL V 0:.€CHERB
59.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
59.00
HEilli Lt€_'
1
3ti_0--
RECREATION REFUND
1`.00
TOTAL rr,FFHEPtkr s �I'S ..,
,
•[��
TOTAL tiTtUl,:�TERS
MOO
TOTAL DUE NENDOR
15.011
CITY OF IIIAMMOhD BAR
L; uATE. Cii,'l i 0011 07'53-03
ta,
'y t uiREGISTER
P'1uE•
¢ %•3
IUE'THRIJ: 06/21/2001
pp
�E3.'Ea3Jt+�.3�EuT�IF i �ri�.-•:F�i3 -A, IT
fL #
INVOICE 1x~..,.CRIP ION
AMOUNT
CNECK
LOS AEEtyLu CC13fl4T, .DIST. AsTUr:l+L,
-
1r 14-15 SL 1 A.TTCiiTPY0491.021
iI00fi-.i11}1.--
41s7
,01 50,S'8
0 12" M,01
001-21114--
,
�r 14-t5SLRY 'vTEK11YT-BYt491(t23
z
82
08/21/20""! 50882
TOTAL
RREEPAIIS
is.,,
-
-.
:
TOTAL-
[ •itLiL1} 4IN R9
.00
-
-E vT, =t
-
DD
E. 1 [ IfE_ikI lDP.
225.5'7 Cr+
-
r- r r r t r•..2
lIMX
AMID NIT
.
4�:}1;`v'•
CAL �r=P:/.:.I'' LM:L =1,3EYL
_1,72
TOTAL
PREPAID
6nn
TOTAL t BIS
; ULIt,"aLE:l
_ _ 1 ..
- -
Tf,
ILS?i:,;E:�iD?�,�^�!.,'
330.7.;.-
- -
�
0,. Ni ,-r._
RECREATION REF'?rIti
�.ao .
TOTr'k.L
PREPAIDS
00
TOTAL
VGLIu!'P'F5
62.:O
T' A
rill7Fik..!?R,
62. DD
2134
TRAFFIC SIG AL MINT
r
_ �- i '_ -4 q<
:
c
CTALi?
�4
,7?_ i}TR
-T-4.1. .�,
- - - -
-t
tl.3n
S7Ghi iI Id r4T
S L: 1i-I!'i
jr[. riLL {�..
iv 6.�_•
-
T •T
•r:EP -
-
_1 TA
O I
112, n
r
-
1 r-
L _
i +
nk = T t c� r r+ ,t��
..
32 r'
TOTAL
[5[.-
MA 1 91
TI'D T„i
OUCHERS
17320.00
-
TOTAL
asst •.ffu"":.
3 s:.00
T
iz:zi�r
SvVPRINT }a4SUti„ tC
.av ¢Cl
TOTAL
-
: PEF AiT;^
-
TOTAL
nHE
I RE
220.00
t� AL
DUE VENDO
IFIEFUND
15.00
TOTALRECREATION
- :, -
;
TOTAL
OU"PEF:a
15.00
TOTAL
._L F';
:,nrE
- ,}-i --
1 Gil
1
- i ` IC Ii T CtF±' Pr"'r+ 111
vGP —MINT SVIS-APPR.EJ.,._
�„� :.jl-
1,000.00
TOTAL
PREPAIDDS
TO T A. —1
VOUCHERS
"000.0o
TOTAL
DUEEDIDIOER
1,t.o .00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE. /iF!220;
CITY OF DIAD! I PAR
RONt DATE: 01.16,.2,}!:1 07.53-M-3
VOd IfiER REGISTER
PA"-' 15
1E THRU: 12001
PRE, n.€
Ct t:f'..li-+-CT '� T C ECT fi.�•.-.
}€IDIS €�.-€;GC.:+ a�� !- Gus
r
}!� #
rsR};y ,-.C. DESCRIPTION +
INVOIC DES€RiPTION
,... �: -fL
n�G��T s�H?�
c EC,
ORANUBE COAST FEWL-INN PrAL•EMY CORE
1127E
CONTEALT CLASS-SURMMFER
tut+, L 8 0n
TOTAL PREE'ATD
A
TOAf<€1
n� , VOjjr
r10
TOTAL i.'JE 4EhBOUR
ir.€
. n
pA IFIu VIDEO PRODUCTS 1WE
-
x :5
iin,.y
F. }� t Er. t,_
Y7Tr_.? C�!`.`}. _ GALA SYS. Ea!
� -� �
1e.,°.r._=
-
10 pL �,,.ErAI.;S
rjl�
. tom
TOTAL VOUCHERS
19,597.60-
TOTAL Lt.E VE1,..Cu
19,5977 ,6C.a
HELEN [ .,i
TOT.".L FRE PAI IS
, t
TO t r L VOUCHE}:S
.€ 0
TOTAL AL �:€uE VE IDOR
206.:'.f
T
P JL ��; }
r.P. 16/01 PAIR L TRAIMIS-PG:263 16AD"I
if}}Zss rle t.? i ii}01
pp i6S€:1 -
!t_€TAI rC_PA 1rzs
F
n f r
TOT. �, +�>iJ{ •NrR�
v}€)
TOT AL DUE tEKBOR
16 100M
LH tr.S -..ALT'
0 } ' 105--
P 14-15 HEALTH INS PREM A! B 2001
d f h
1.,..E7.87- )5, 21, 2001
5,1875
TOTAL PR;EPATTI
14,=87.$7
TOTAL ;`D•JCHERS
,GO
TOTAL DUE VEMBOR
14,9-47.87
rr I rtx
1+C,_lz v�D:n`
BENEFIT
0L ! L1jt 31
�z t'•=
t.: ? r
CD. rlrr.. ..E TF �;7 'jrt �? CG
: 1bi :+t, R-- RE rONTRI,. :R
1 f
3,376afZl 08121/2'001
J()u'+6
Jl f,:--
?p 16/01 RETIRE ENTRIB-EE
5,840.17 12Q01
..9
5057316
TOTAL f REPAIDS -
2,5 28
TOTAL VOUCHERS
*OC)
TOTAL DUE VENDOR:
9,256.:,8
, -
C.A},GL1�,'._ } �;�?" ELS
`-11290,
CONTRACT CLASS -SUMMER
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
155.70
TOTAL I<OE err!QUOR
155.7{}
SHArtT CORIF
JUL-01 _15
-
JUL-01 �CE_P'v!L`-.LT y,G i:S
U:.. 1 U E� iYJRrvv
i87.=5
y
TO1;L FREF-AIDS
�r
TOTAL VOuCHEI
441.Ct7
TOTAL BLEE VEtrijOR
491.,)?
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN ;}E. 0 16/2001 07:5S;GS
VGCtCHER RESISTER
PAS= lu
DUE THRU. 08/21/2001
PREPAT -
Fr['4D/5ECT-Ai CT Yv:C=ItCT7PE--
Rei #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMUNT DATE CHECK.
R g, D BLUEPRINT
0115 1� silt>-
4T-563 PR NO' "- CALTRAN€- MAPS
53 a.}.;
46634 PRINTING—TIAFIS,
18.46
TOTAL PREPAID=_
,00
TOTAL ttLt;C!-iERS
71.79
TOTAL DUEL VENDOR
711.79
rr
—,n - T _
.,_..SL v,.--_. ,.L,r .,C.....a,
_„_ 0 4_ r
11210
11ts184_8 MT(, supD' q,
=.G6 •
..
11145
1013-44.23 y�•.UPPI E HiR FCOMF? MITG 7/24-
11.5f
T S
TOTAL
TEITAI VOOCui-QjS
42. 613
TOYh: e�
e rl� DOL , E", CrR
Ji2
REFU'-'n Pa`� DEP-„ R:EA.AN M1
.
50. 0 -
—
TOTAL PREPA, E_TS
.00T
'v=
TC? NL VOUCHERS
5^...00
TnTRI nli�.: `L,rg DOR
50.00
r T*r. 5 , s ;m*rpt Tt'
112 78
CONTRACT CLASSES -SUMMER
1,45%40
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAI. VCL:_!�ERS
1,454.40
TOTAL DUE MID, P
1,454.40
rr e-.r-�f 7?t s rl
41 464 ' c SVCS US CARDS
� ... _:: ; :� I?�T SVCS -BUS -L•tf��l: '
177
> , �n
_ _... ..
jt 'C3
___.
L4
1.. i:Y±i_ CS TNIT �lICS—BB ShPNa'D I ABLE
: RI 3 �try :.L
116.80
TOTS' VOUCHERS
T0_t?-_ DUE VENDOR
a
_T
CONTRA. CLABS'SIUMMER
351-60
TOTAL PREPAID_
.00
TvV0U...DHERC'
^5i.60,
TOTAL DO: `.t� 4D DR ;
_51,::0
fin i>�t
1/;?1 IMEDIATIO TRAINPs!r ?i-
3'1x55
--
611'2.2=101 FUND CUM hTG-ht 12 { /M1
130.00
TOTAL PREPAI S
,pn
TOTAL ,'-7ERS
505.56
TCTAL Gti!E VENDOR '
5it5.5
GO. _,--_- 4.1_
tt � 245` L':AY f:AhiP ETr,Pt IE
�74 1_
TOTREI AI S
.00
TC!T?;L VOUCHERS
274.15
TCA_ DI :E"BR
234.15
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATEI 07"L3*03
VDUC R REGISTER,
PAGE. 17
J
I" T
DUE I H RU O6/21/200i
,EPA-, ri
pp y
FUNDISECT -A'CCT+lROjZCT-ACCT
po #
IN"j, T- DCLIMT
?DICE —ilPTIM
}inrCE
AMOUhr7 CHECK
dOE SAEN
'01
55 1 -17 7 6 REFUND PARK DEP-SUMMTRD-u
-5. 00
T -If I•AL rtj EPA T D_Q
.011i -
TOTAL VOUCHERS
25. 00
T I
10FTIAL DUE VENDOR
Lr5.00
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE
rwl 3A.
23„x? LEGAL AD -Pi- W01-24
TOTAL FR.EPA1 DS
OTAL IT
I I UCPIE IF,
167. 28
TOTAL DUE VENDOR'1671.2B
KCI ;AN SECURITY
8123 COURIER S7VCS-AUG 01
210.00.
,�F, A
I-TAL Ps P TH-.-.
Of
TOT Al" V 0 UC P1 ER S
21 li 1) . rlj 11)
TOTAL DUE VEMDOR
210.00
511 7 `82 REFUND PARK DEP-PETERS-101,11
50.00
1
TOTAL PREPAPIDS
us 01
TOT A' V OUIC H R
Tri AL DUE VENDOR
DID
y
-�7DR tIT SOCr-Q--nDr:A CYhj ppj;
II
448,62
TOT p.1 FREPAIDS
.00
.nTA 101 if-FIERS
62
TOTAL DUE VBIDOR
448. 62
n y p m
CYC{ �S I Cq
256. 150
Dc
TOTAL FIREPATIG
.00
TO"Al "'I EHE c:
i
2-50". 50
T Ol'AL DUE VENDOR
2�6.50,
T
An p!
a --
T
-74140-7/28M - Sl
2 .28'
"L 4_
.417 32 - o"S EL -171
SVCS- LLAD 33-
214cf. 81
Irk
-1741 1 L - cl �rl` ril -TPAX RL
FC 1 CCV
41 —t— 1 16 T
-30
n-71 PLi'z r SIYI'��-PAF
417409V -T
El 5 99.51,
TO T PAL P ADi b'
TOTAL V I'D U C �
m &R. IS
9,89i.40
TOTAL D -LE IVIE-I'DJOR
9,27-1.40
MA-KEMENT
1 2 6 4 -A t 1 -A 77 10
CAM SHERIFF CNTF-AUGUST
'75Or,
2 6 4 4 1- 1 '_i G
I I OAV
LEACSE SHERIFF CNTIR-AUGUSIT
1,.c 00
- 1— D -M.
TOTIA"i FREPAI
"
. 00
TOTAL YBUCHEERIS
HITAL D VENDOOR
CITY GAF DIP.kIT'1D BAP
PUN DATE. 08/16120D1 07.53:03
VOUCHER. REGISTER
PAGE.' 16
y
L.UE T�.i) ' f o [r0 t si l"+t'*13..
PFE AID
F'tLr D'I�'LT-A,-ED`T-PFDurECT- i:CT
Pit #
11141VOICE DESCRIPTION
M ! g' i PATE
CHECK
SOUTHILAIND SPORTS OFFICIALS
C-015350-4.5300—
- .
+0�4
ii•}�:
1 1 1�F -�S SPORTS '. — `
7/ ,Q r: RTS OFFICIALS -7/1-15
1,590.00
TOTAL PREF IDS
Cir
TDTf liIOUvi CRE
t 5v
TOTAL DUE VEN-firiR
i
' -T.a. v?iTit'k vJ ct"}SrvR f'rN dee IIFLryeEiTliF�iY
1 t==:--
PP i -i` LIFE INS PREM. -AUG 2601.
y1;l/,n,,,v0'
57,
001 ..ii06--
F 14-i5 SUP0 LIFE TtSi FE! , UC, Cl
106.60 D°/?i/BGG''
5GJ; V : .
TOTAL PFEPAIDS'
14 rft
a
I t —
S.00
,-TATE. N .CAI IFORNIT tt
pp -.11 SLF.Y FT t=."1! -`.fit S-97 f 3 M
283.61 0{{8, .21,12 01
50881
DOTAL PREFA._i5
.8a.6i
Ton., V C�UC: f'FlE n
r
.. ..
Tl'Tnt DUE gip WR
i.-s:�4 1
C F t.
4. _M--
PEER TTSN FErJIND
TOTAL ttO.-'1Gr!!ER5
120.O'D
TOTAL DUEENT'" R
lm. 00
IBM s7njiki
OTAL PRE T«tS
.00
TOT AL VOUCHERS,
TD
w ,l., }: �- --`--
112",6
14 it If31 SPIEFIFF-1
5G.81
Tfs'TE�L P: EPAIiry
.!'tet..
UT AL VOUCHERS
59.83
T1Tr` art:)-.i:-M1kii
59.vt8
11 4"
CONT°�i-' rL�_E -SUMMEER sal
.•
990.00
TOTAL PREPAID
.00
TOTAL V0UCHEPS
990.00
TOTAL DU i'!',�Li�7F
r.�,G.GG
+ k AN T!`.t'JuNCUIi
on 0-'--`31P54
REFUND PARK DEPK
510.00
I „ITAl, t• rtEPAI'
.00
TOTAL VD''-F;FRS
50.00
TOT All- DUEE VENDOR
50,0;3
DR—S FLACEE
001-22002—
51913 REFUND PAR , vEP-FEAGAN PK
50,00
TOTAL PF:EPAIM,
.00
TOTAL L VO HERS
50. GG
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50.00
CITY`OF DIAMOND EAR
{ TA t r
RUNT DAME, 08/1 ;�,h'_UC1 07..53.0"
.. {,f Urr.C:ER °EMES ES
A_ -
PAGED
DUE TH U= fLSP11200;
FUNIC?/SEC1 .ACCT'PRWIECT—ACCT
SD #
i5iCER DESCRIPTION
AMOUtIff DATE
THE WHOLE Et4CHI ADA IFIL
0014090-42225--
11213
A t v 1
4i4.1:_s D.Rri LtP.iLi- '7/31 JAI
v s.
113TAL PREPAIDS
.00
TM, AE i`tOLICiaS
442.2-c"
..TOTAL. ,.AIM VENTJR... -
4�r'.r..t.3-
FEEL EER? Tl 100 REFUND
35.0
CREPJ1Iijr,_', _
.00
.TAT S t ICHE `
f 17t__.
!�.a._.1 RErC�ErTiDIN YiEEUiW.i=.
TOTAL PF-..EPA1
TO I AL VOUCHERS
I A0
_
T03AN, IDUE...VOiLlrli,
151 s.0,._ -
TOTAL PR'ERY,TnQ
�
TCT U L. rlig
TDITAI- -
•3L
A,"? A t.'7{ Pi K C!lm>7' FTP`
rc -ftf!
TOTAL._ :.
S
TTOTAi
00
0 to r 5
-
TOTAL DIU E VENDOR
.65.00
_TRE'! M _N 240 OUTLET
450.00
TuTAAI FR firlit5
e
TE;T, ,L DUE 'VET,—;DGR
450.00
3......
17141 DIESSEE CLEAN' UP W21,101 10
x2 _"
T CUTAL PRE., II5
.0
TOT1 �)1 F;
._ :_
o.
` c q � -
]:__..:
TOTAL
r t I rtr
TT per!
"MUTAT E;!CUY'SaOtti LFh4
-' to
2,10_S.e_i
CTAI FF R' EFATDD06
-
-
(Q1. 2•3
-' { �• •'` .,._ �'
�_+i,. __ a �,v� FEE EMM-By'.-,'H�`jILnL -
- 80. 010 - -
j.OITAL FREf'AIDS
06
TOTAL !;L {EHERS
80.110
TLTAI DUE `'ENDOIR
80.00
x
CITY OF DIAMOND RAP
RUN BATE. 0,M-6/''.Cn1 07_53»;
` 0CHER REGISTER;,,
i=AGE° •
DUE THt'',L1 08121121001
2100
PREPAID
PREPAS Ii
FrD/SECT-ACCT PRRJ4 T -AC T
PINVIDICE DESCRIPTION
nprr—
AM[D T r!AT'
VP-RT-Zn.N CALIFORNIA
LHO2676-7101 PH SVr-e—T.NTiERNCT LINES
UK2.7Y
104AL F R4EPA1DS
11;y
TDTA t,G.tx HERS
J uv .t_ ,�
TOTAL DUE vEi1LCR
_�_° 4
WIRELESS MESSAGING SVCS
00140-1-0-42125— .
8 flit CSA �.} 'i
-- Ct) 3
TOTAL C.:EPA ileS_,
- .00
TOTAL VOUCHERS°ia
Sf
TOTAL ai Tib iE V ENTMOR -
82.37
VTUAp OR
f"'_}'•� --
5i7. -.7 1a RLFL��PARK n _ EfT15GE"
n ._,00 -
TC'TAL PFEF'AIEE
{
-.. TOTAL G'0UCH EP;S -
- - -
200.00
TOTAL DUE t,EN"'D R
"•eLCi
tal'n..OGN SERIvICE PLAN -
-
- -
?yJa
PP 1T-15 VISION PREM!LlMS-A;1G 2001"
1,1.01.40 8,`21/2001 9-067�
TOTAL PREFAII.S
TOTAL VoUrHERS
4,136.40
aC '
Tj3TAL DUE VE";
1,136.40
S.AK tR W aK EE L AND
0 0 '
4?8 ;f RECREATION RLS clND=.r'Li1s00
TOTAL PREPAIEG
.00
- _
TOTAL '1ii;JCHER �t-t
59.00,! -
TOTAL I-- E. , VEINIDOR, - -
5^,aQ0 -
s�:
Lai, r
j. Tir_t
si tffJTF 30
'/3311 WATER v
ICv -TTCT
a cf69 -
.J_
TOTAL P EPAICI_
,00
f-TAL VL C
{ 549.69 - -
TOTAL DU LC -D -UR
1-54-9.69
k _ _�Li A. GC CARr q�Pkrir
-- - '•
SUPPLIES -JULY 4 CG��vEP.T
,, �,�
1 _
EBWSITE RE!;ISTRATIC
1
MELTING103.90
i -
i3OMIP 5UPP'LTEc C&M
105.90,
r .t.: _:--
PAi= MNET-DOYLE.DEBTEFAND
20.76
PHO r�p i.I ;' E��~L2- 7M
i@
r a-
-
TOTAL FREPAIDS,
;C; -
TOT , GG f r-4 4=:
iLri F'7 Y_�L-G •e..f,+v
f
a 114+11=11 - -
TOTAL D- JEE '1ENDOR
714 .1=.
T tC..S '1T'LI'G cTq TG�,r
_ �;. u. IC 5 It,
-
� a_: .37--
aaL.. 21448 f RrP_ MAIN'fE.tiA.R.,E4UL" "i
14 ,5 c,
{TAI 'F!EPAluv
a i,i
TOTAL VOUCHERS
i G c ti,
-1 CT SGL IDUE: VE-rDOR
i
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE. 0811612001 0*53.03
VOUCHER REGISTER
PAGE' 21
DUE THRU. 08/21/201
PPE PAlED
l
FUND/SECT-ACCT P R 0 ECT -ACCT
PO
spaVOIICCE IF- SCR1FTIC",
fi zUOT DATE CHEC}.
WEST COAST MEDIA
11.2'.5 ,.
YY
,3'•�.�.i�lF7�-. S-A D �t1 3 t L'
AL U -� l CERT IN PAP6K
475. M'
TOTAL --PREFAI D
r..:
TOTAL:VETUCI ERRS
475.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
475. 0 0
WILDLIFE CORRIDOR CONSEWATIO(g AUTH
� , f'� �.. i •_
::it ANN""�BRS;?: F" S 01,102'
S FY
-.
500.00TOTAL
R
.00
TOTAL VOUCHER'S
500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
500.100
XEROX C011po
jR ri '
6_9:. 41..1.:?--
11370
D=175773 CC�FIE� eth�4E�
317.552
!-j-17a0.1-+000
1'15j0't^7.. MOVE—COPY t"AC►fINE
-
�7c}
• +
tl i
TOTni :-`REF ,IDS
.0vrl
T0TA.L VOUC PIS
89.7.12
TOTAL DUE VE�LIIOR.
,.897 12' -' -
... n
':'.M.C.A. =tv.•IC[ N
. :3:x .1
01015-350-42353—.-
REI4B-B/DAY CELED
43.0
TOTAL FREPAIDS
.0
TOTAL `+'+OU HL u
43 00
TOTAL € UE 1 iC'EiDS
4 , Dr
rtE 0 A +r0'
TOTAL FRE AIDS
.Dx`
.. E In C
- "iiT 'VOUCHERS
€OPAL D UEEEV E,L0
nrry 00
LET , ,- W I Rh:.:
CO., 41 3}--
1 tQ7
s ii l
1
t� ,-
CONTRACT CLASS-,S.1'UNI R
108.00 0
TOTAL PFEPAIDS
TOTAL O, lrHEFS
1081.00
TOTAL DUE VENDnn
108.01)
YMCA INDIAN GUIDES
`.1,_5 ! '5._, '-
REIMB-EJDH;1 CELEBR HON
87.50-
TOTAL Fps=PANS.11ti
r
TGTA_ VOUCHER
87 ! ,
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
67.50
jaF. Ill
00' -34760—
RECREATIaN R-F'Uh.D
145.00
TOTAL PREFAIPC
,00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
145.C3ij
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
145.00
BOB 77RECR
On, . �1 .. s
/ P },
:4f�:.ry'..t2�}1:}1, !-'l_�iG COQ`•; :MTG-6!12,26 1/i`)i .-
:130.00.
TOTAL FREFAIDS
.001
TOTAL VOUCHERS
130.00
TOTAL. DUE V-EINIDOR
138.CIV,
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
5/31 /QQ ReserrE-€a r Filing Stamp
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
Claim No.
1. Claims for death, injury to person or to
Pmozilll Property must be filed not , -
later than six (6) months after the O=rrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) r ,
2. Claims for damages to real pmperty mug be filed not later than one (1) year ' ; C 7 P
after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
3. Read entire claim before filing.
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident
5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. (SIGN EACH SHEET)
7. Claim must be filed with the City Clerk. (Gov. Code Seca 915a)
8. Additional documentation submitted with claim becomes a permanent part of record.
To: CITY CLERK Age of Claimant (if nan ni person)
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SUrrE 100
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
Name of Claimant/' _ Hmw Telephone Number
,Jp/,,1 , f J s5
Home Address of Claimant City and State Business Telepihene Numbw
-3/ 23 6 aQ 1,3 S/F � /Ji A,77 0--i /J (3A 2
Busmess Address of Claimsat City and State
Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sen regardingti is claim:
Ar- A-S A<5,n 1('c
How did Dom.: , • Geor minry occur? Give lull palb=iars.
C— ttiJA �"Lr�- L-t Nc' AN r� L✓AL NlerC-olt
CC
7U11
�' `I 6S"' �— Lt/1►'KG � ?i�
?U11 'r-e Gv� 774) -J '3 f' G�f
When did DAMAGE or INJURY oxer? Give full particulars, date, time of day:
S�cc�'n M & f' A /L57` Ti.yi �9P Alk 3 y,
T? -ra/L s A�sv
- %god �"40. � - -
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully and where apphopriate give strxt names and addresses. If diagram is provided in
blank space on back of form insicate mes�hnro�ts from landmarks: p ULI291F� 1� -2-S6-1--3
f�P/o< i f^eilr - ('
What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of Coy employees caaussingth�e lin, jurry�or
damage, ifknown: I � /� I r — cl;-AY 4c--6 ,V A7ry U/r+'/ r-tl' �- live, 6ol ries- / n77%-'-
f-'f"�"`-
-NO U2 woTS.
What DAMAGE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed
n ,J r> > n, i'fdM c
What AMOUNT do you claim on account ofeach item of injury or damage "'of date ofpresentation ofthis claim giving basis of
computation: �r L16'7-'7 Z S 7` t A�6710s
Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT of your claim for personal, per..WXoperty, andlor real property damages. Give basis of computation:
416 i- 77>e. -07-
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SUITE 190
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
PHONE 909-396-5671 FAX 909-861-3117
The undersigned hereby makes application to construct specific improvements on public .streets at the location described below with
the understanding all work is subject to the provisions of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code and an approved Street Construction
Permit
In consideration of the granting of the permit,, it is further agreed by the applicant that the City of Diamond B ar and any of its officers
or employees shall be saved harmless by the applicant from any liability or responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to persons
or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any :cork undertaken under the terms of this application and the permit
orpermits which maybe granted in response thereto, and that all liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. Traffic Control devices
shall be installed per Cal-Tran's Traffic Manual and W.A.T.C.H. Handbook before start of construction. This permit shall expire
Twelve (12) months after the date issued. _
IMPORTANT NOTICE'
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: (Describe'and show sketch if appropriate) section 424614217 or the Government code
requires a DigAlert Identification Number
Z be issued before a "Permit to Excavate'
0 will be valid. For your DigAlert I.D. Number
a �
Call Underground Service Alert
_
� TOLL FREE 1-800422-4133
Two working days before you dig
J
CL
d
(� LOCATION OF WORK: Estimated value of work: $
Signature of Applicant Date
Applicant (printed) Contractor
Address Address
17
S
City, Zip Code _ City, Zip Code
l �
YC/ •
Telephone (Office & 24 hr. Emergency Numbers) Telephone (Office & 24 hr. Emergency Numbers
Permission is granted to Applicant as noted above to construct the improvements as noted on this permit and per the approved plans
in accordance with the standards and specifications of the City of Diamond Bar for public improvements.Incorporated in this permit
are all applicable approvedplans for
improvement and special p conditions attached hereto, including the Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction, late tedition.
! Rn 4:q--
For City Engin er
~-PERMIT NO. QC .��J
J PLAN CHECK FEE
W cPERMIT ISSUANCE FEE-
DATE ISSUED ._ I
IL v�, GUARANTEE (CASH BOND)
Applicant Copy - White INSPECTION FEE S• 0—" D
Cashier Copy - Goldenrod
Office Copy - Green TOTAL AMOUNT DUE M)
City Engineer's Office-Pink &YeHow
Work initiated before calling for inspection under this permit is subject to removal and reconstruction.
CALL (909) 396=5671 AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE STARTING WORK
Approximately three years ago we had a water leak from the main water line
coming from the meter on the under the sidewalk. It appeared that the roots from
the tree that had been planted too close, both to the meter and the water tine, had
broken the line from the pressure of the growth of the roots.
Once we found out that the roots of the tree had caused the problem we
called the city hall and the very next morning a crew came over to our house and cut
the tree down to the about six inches above the ground.`
At that time we were never notified that we needed a permit to either dig nor to
remove the concrete from the sidewalk, nor at any time did an inspector come by to
varify if the cement had been put back properly.
On 9!6/2000 we were notified by the Walnut Valley -Water District that we
had a water leak coming from the main water line on our side of the meter .I
contacted the water department to inform them that I needed water in the house
since I did not know how long it would take to repair the problem.
Once I dug down to where the problem was I noticed that once again the
roots from the same tree had done the damage again. However this time the City
Hall did get involved and we were told that we needed a permit to dig under the
sidewalk and to break the cement and to also to put it back. Therefore since the city
called Parks and Recreations remove the tree the first time this would. indicate to me
that they approved the planting of the tree so close to the main water fine and the
water meter. I have taken photos and video of the area in question for your revue if
you, wish to see the video let me know. I hope that you can see that the tree was the
cause of both problems with the water line being busted. The first time I only
repaired the cracked plastic PVC water line which was done in one day, however
the second time it took three days and this time I replaced all the water lines with
copper materials. Unfortunately I do not have any of the receipts from the first
incident. I had to take off from work one day in each incident. On the first incident I
was earning $134/day in addition to paying a plumber $575 for parts and labor. As
for the second incident, I'm currently earning $148.721dayin addition to the
plumber who charged me 51500 for the prolect,parts and labor .This of course does
not include the city fees of $110 for the permit.
•e ely
OHN J so
AFF)"'
kx
-� x
�r��_ , �
e
��
a,
� �:�
��
>- s
i.
s
..- ,,.
,� [;
a
yy
�'
•4,
`.
i
i ��
.� ;.
�p
��.
-
� - - r � `:� �.
i
��Iryl
�� � �`
Ili
;`> ;�.
.—r°� _ _ �,' � s ' � `
I.,,.
� �
,_
._ .
�.
..
,<�
,.
� .� _ � � .•^'"' :yes' � -�` ��r.-"+,•-a�.'.�zc.,-•.r. ��t�i�^,
r
et�'- � ' � � �"�'�'•��`�m��n°c...7-i `Y+@:�s:. �f.+cx� .s�v�c >,�,x., �r— � ,i.+-,,,� -. � ia^ ` arM
�= z�Zz..; - ,a. c._ _`c� , Tom, � � x�k°., ; .,��< 4 _z.. -u
.. ? •.
. � . - - v;
r _ .. - � _" �� ��." -
- 4 .t ,a r ,¢„ *s. ��•�_-+�-�u-Y?� "�'�"�'r' '�-�'t�r�c' w+a �"J�:'TR-
.x
a
1
INI
_ _ ..}.
st
.:a.r "S. -.=.+.a. i'k 'R.R<w,•#t
_"a":-"a'':.:•,.'",`4,,„�y"f^•L;rL"sswT.'4..t�+--r..c"'.. s
� f
a
J'
.t
r
r y�
2n,
• . Y .+ i . � r �'}1 t � "'�� � t if CL �� 1 i® ->d ! ..
f �
.L
CITY COUNCIL ftEPORT 6.7
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
TITLE: Acceptance of the work performed by Brongo Construction for the repair of the
landslide in Sycamore Canyon Park and authorization for the City Clerk to file the notice
of completion and to release any retention amount 35 days after the recordation date.
Issue Statement
Shall the City Council accept the work performed by Brongo Construction on the repair
of the landslide at Sycamore Canyon Park?
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the work performed by Brongo Construction
2. Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion
3. Release the 10% retention amount 35 days after recordation of the Notice
of Completion.
Financial Summary
This project has a budget of $105,000. Total cost to complete the project was
$101,945.
Background
The City Council awarded a contract to Brongo Construction on May 1, 2001 for the
repair of the landslide at SycamoreCanyon Park. The work has been completed and
the project is ready to be accepted.
Discussion
The total construction contract with Brongo Construction is $57,775. The 10% retention
being held by the City of Diamond Bar is $5,777.50. This retention amount will be
released to the contractor thirty-five (35) days after the recordation of the Notice of
Completion:
P7
r qb
f ll
g se
Director of Community Services
Attachment: Notice of Completion
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 21 2001
AGENDA NO.6°
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manag
SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for work performed by Jeff Merrick Construction to
construct City Hall offices at the AQMD campus
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the work performed by Jeff
Merrick Construction, and authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release
any retention amount thirty-five (35) days after the recordation date.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget
Construction Budget
Contingency
Project Budget
$304,000
15,000
$319,000
The total cost of the construction work completed by Jeff Merrick Construction is $302,131.24.
It should be noted that the additional expense to install the automatic card reader at the front door of
City Hall ($7,901) was charged against the project budget. The work was completed by Simplex Inc.
and is therefore not part of the contract between the City and Jeff Merrick Construction. However, it
is a cost related to completing the project.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On January 4, 2001 the City Council awarded a contract to Jeff Merrick Construction in the amount of
$304,000 plus a 5% contingency amount ($15,000), for a total construction project budget of
$319,000. Jeff Merrick Construction has completed all work associated with the contract. All work
has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications for this project. The final
construction contract cost for construction of the City Hall offices, Tess the amount for installation of
the card reader at the front door, is $302,131.24.
While, it was anticipated that all work associated with this contract would be completed by March
2001, there -were unforeseen circumstances that delayed the completion of the construction work until
June 2001. However, this did not delay the relocation of the City Hall offices. The relocation of the
City Hall offices occurred on schedule and the contractor worked on weekends and after hours, at no
additional cost to the City, to complete the construction project.
Since June, the contractor has been working with City staff,'AQMID staff and the subcontractors to
provide as -built auto -cad drawings of the City's offices. The City received these drawings in early
August. This completes the remaining commitments of the contractor.
Therefore, it is appropriate for the City to formally accept the work performed by Jeff Merrick
Construction, to file the appropriate notice of _completion with the County of Los Angeles, and to
release the retention amount ($13,250.45) thirty-five days after the recordation date.
&W
Prepared by: Dave Doyle, Deputy City Manager
RECORDING REQUESTED BY{PRIVATE )
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21825 E. COPLEY DRIVE
DIAMOND BAR CA 91765-4177
f ,
ATTENTION: CITY CLERK
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion.
Notice is hereby given that:
I. The undersigned is the owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or -estate stated below in the property hereinafter
described:
2. The full name of the owner is Air Quality Management District
3. The full address of the owner is 21865`1. Conley Drive
Diamond Bar CA 91765
4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee.
(If other than fee, strike "In fee" and insert, for example, "purchaser under contract of purchase," or "lessee")
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common
are: NAMES ADDRESSES
City of Diamond Bar 21825E Coulee Drive, Diamond Bar CA 91765
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on August 3, 2001 . The work done was:
Construction of City Hall ofMcesat the Air ()uality Management District Cam us
7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was
Jeff Merrick Construction Tanuary 4 2001
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert none) (Dale of Contract) -
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of
California, and is described as follows_21825 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar CA 91765-4178
9. The street address of said property is 21825 E. Copley Drive; Diamond Bar CA 917654178
- (If no street address has been officially assigned,msertnone')
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Dated:
' Venfication for lndtwdual Owner
Signature of owner or corporateofficer of a6Wnarned in paragraph 2. or his agent
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Det)uty Ci Manager an` the declarant of the foregoing
(resident of', Manager of'. "q partner of', "Owner of', etc.) -
notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contests thereof, the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on 20 -at. Diamond Bar California.
(Date of signature) _ (City where signcd).. - -
(Personal signature of the individual who is sweating that the contents of
the notice of completion are true)
DO NOT RECORD
REQUIREMENTS AS TO NOTICE OF COMPLETION
A notice of completion must be filed for record WITHIN 10 DAYS after completion of the work of improvement
(to be computedexclusive of the day of completion), as provided in Civil Code Section 3093.
The "owner" who must file for record a notice of completion of a building or other work of improvement means the owner (or
his successor in -interest at the date the notice is filed) on whose behalf the work was done, though his ownership is less than the fee title.
For example, if A is the owner in fee, and B, lessee under a lease, causes a building to be constructed, then' B, or whoever has succeeded
to his interest at the date the notice is filed, must file the notice:
If the ownership is in two or more persons as joint tenants or tenants in common, the notice may be signed by any one of the co-
owners (in fact, the foregoing form is designed for giving of the notice by only one covenant), but the names and addresses of the other
co-owners must be stated in paragraph 5 of the form.
Note that any Notice of Completion signed by a successor in interest shall recite the names and addresses of his transferor or
transferors.
In paragraphs 3 and 5, the full address called for should include street number, city, county and state.
As to paragraphs 6 and 7, this form should be used only where the notice of completion covers the work of improvement as a
whole. If the notice is to be given only of completion of a particular contract, where the work of improvement is made pursuant to two or
more original contracts, then this form must be modified as follows:
(1) Strike the works "A Work of improvement? from paragraph 6 and insert a general statement of the kind of work done or
materials furnished pursuant to such contract (e.g., "The foundations for the improvement");
(2) Insert the name of the contractor under the particular contract in paragraph 7.
In paragraph'7 of the notice, insert the name of the contractor for the work of improvement as a whole. No contractor's name
need be given if there is no general contractor, e.g:_, on so-called "owner -builder jobs."
In paragraph 8, insert the full legal description, not merely a street address or tax description. Refer to deed' or policy of title
insurance. If the space provided for description is not sufficient, a rider may attached.
In paragraph 9, show the street address, if any, assigned to the property by any competent public or governmental authority.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage
SUBJECT: Increase contract for consulting services provided by Gary
Neeley to include continued and additional services not to exceed $10,000.
ISSUE STATEMENT: Shall the City Council approve a $10,000 increase to the
current $14,500 contract with Gary Neeley for professional services.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a $10,000
increase to the previously awarded contract for consulting services provided by Gary
Neeley.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY: This additional contract amount would be expensed to the
Regional Planning - Professional Services appropriation in the Planning Division of the
2001-2002 annual budget (001-5210-44210). There are sufficient funds available.
BACKGROUND: Under an agreement' made in January, 2001, Mr. Neeley
was engaged by the Interim City Manager, within his authority to award contracts under
$15,000, to provide professional governmental affairs consulting services for the period
of February 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. The proposal included particular
stipulations related to other consulting services and scope of work, as indicated in the
attached correspondence. Those particulars would not be amended, however the
contract amount would be increased by $1,0,000 and the period of services would be
extended from ending December 31, 2001, to June 30, 2002. The described
assignment would not be changed.
Because Mr. Neeley remains uniquely qualified to conduct this type of professional
service due to his extensive experience with land use matters related to the City of
Diamond Bar and the eastern canyons particularly, proposals from other consultants
were not solicited prior to awarding the original contract. This purchasing procedure is
consistent with state and municipal purchasing requirements.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO �
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members g the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City ManagerOpol
SUBJECT: Contract with Van Winkle and Affiliates in the amount of $15,000 for
video services and related documentation as required. -
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Shall the City Council approve a $15,000 contract with Van Winkle and Affiliates to
provide specialized video and documentation services (videography) geared toward
litigation mitigation.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a $15,000 contract with Van 'Winkle
and Affiliates for documented video services. The contract would be for video services
to be provided on an as needed basis at the hourly rates stipulated in Example #1 of the
attached "Contract Proposal
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The $15,000 contract amount would be expensed, as used, to specific capital
improvement projects included in the current year `budget. There are sufficient funds
available in special funds where various capital improvement projects are appropriated.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department and, Parks and Recreation Department have used the
services of Van Winkle and Affiliates to record construction data for specific
improvement projects in the past. The product created by Van Winkle provides a
reliable video record that protects the City's interests in case of potential Litigation, as so
often occurs with expensive construction projects
Since the City has a number of projects to complete in the current year, like the
streetscapes on Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Road (Temple to Torita), the
Van Winkle proposal has been broughtforward for consideration. This contract cost
would be partially offset by reduced inspection costs and can be justified as a means of
protecting the City from unnecessary future litigation costs.
Because Van Winkle & Affiliates offers a unique professional service due to the video
quality and accompanying documentation and because of the successful performance
of the firm in the past on Diamond Bar projects, informal estimates were solicited by
staff from other providers. The Van Winkle firm remains most qualified to serve the City.
s� x
L M Q
Litigation Mitigation Documentation
Annual Rate Contract Agreement
2001-2002
City of Diamond Bar
Contract Bid Proposal
21103 Germ Bar, CA 91789
Tel # [90% 91595-2002
TaMO
.com
i'
Contract Proposal
June 2001
Van Winkle & Affiliates has done several "LMD" jobs for the City of Diamond Sar.
Maple Hill Park, Minnequa traf iicisafety, Minnequa landslide, School Traffic Study,
Sunset Crossing, Golden Springs road restoration, Peterson Park, and Pantera Park,
just to name a few.
We presently charge full day, half day or hourly rates for video shooting and a set rate
for work done in the edit bay [which includes video logging]. When all the work is done
and added up using the various rates, the dollar amount can be higher than expected.
This may be acceptable on a job by jab basis or on large jobs, but not for all projects.
This Proposal Clff+ers A Money Saving Option For Aft Work Done In The City.
This proposal could be looked at as a "WIN-WIN". The City would have "LMD services
at the best passible rate and VW&A could more effectively schedule its different tasks
throughout the city, while also having a consistent "cash flow' to facilitate being at the
cutting edge of technology, providing for our clients, performance at the highest
possible standards.
EXAMPLE #1
[Using the Present Rate Sheen
• -..A job using 21 hours of video shooting @ $70 per hour = $1470.00
• ...Add 9 hours in the edit bay logging and duplicating @ $50 per hour = $450.00
• ...The tape stock costs for a job of this size could be approximately $56
• ...This job would cost $1,976.00+.
If this example was a big project no one would give it a second thought, but on small
projects it could be cost prohibitive, or even hurt the opportunity to have video
documentation on future small projects.
EXAMPLE #2
(Using the New Proposal Rate Of $1,500»00 Per Month)
• With this retainer rate a job of this size would cost $1,500.00+.
• A savings of $476.00.
• This rate is for thirty [30) hours of work per month and would include; videotape
shooting, logging footage, videotape editing, and attending meetings, [full service].
• Additional hours of work during the month [after 30 hours] would be billed at $70.00
per hour and invoiced separately. Special needs/equipment, tape or CD stock
would still be billed per unit/per job.
• This LMD Service would cover all project areas for the City of Diamond Ear.
• The annual cast of this proposal rate is approx $18,000 per year and could be paid
two times per month or $750 per warrant period.
• NOTE. the amount of hours per month or the rates are subject to negotiations.
This is only a good sample to consider.
4 • w
In the years to come, your "LMD" library will become the most valuable tool in your
toolbox. The power of such a tool will help you take a hard look at the future and
where you want to go.. or not go. Here are some suggestions on how to use LMD
documentation footage:
• Training all staff personnel in specific areas of responsibility.
• Reports: small in-house reports for staff, City Council, or City Manager, and larger
reports for other government agencies at the state or federallevels.
• Public Service Announcements [PSA] for information programs for the general
public.
• Power Point presentations to state or federal agencies, schools districts, fire and
police departments, chambers of commerce, using J -peg pictures taken from video.
• Mitigation, to improve the quality of life issues with new projects.
• Litigation... to "WIN*' if you need to go to court for any reason.
These are just a few of the things this tool can be used for. I welcome the opportunity
to discuss this proposal with you and to make your "LMD" library the best tool you
have.
Tom Van Winkle
Van Winkle & Affiliates
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Linda Lowry, City ManagWA!t
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2001 -XX, authorizing the City to obtain state and local
summary background information through the fingerprinting of employees
including volunteers and contract employees.
ISSUE STATEMENT':
to obtain state and
a resolution of the :City of
Diamond Bar authorizing the Ci
Should the City Council approvei'yResolution No. 2,nd local summary criminal history
information of employees including volunteers and contract employees.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopt Resolution
No. 2001 -XX.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
There is no impact to the FY 01=02 municipal budget. No additional funding is needed
since staff has incorporated the agency costs for fingerprint submissions into the FY 01
02 Budget and the cost of the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station upgrades will be
funded jointly by the Cities of Diamond Bar and Walnut through Career Criminal
Apprehension Program funds.
BACKGROUND:
Penal Code Sections 11105 (b) (10) and 13300 (b) (10)authorize cities and counties to
receive state and local criminal history: information ,to assist the agency in fulfilling
employment duties. In order to receive criminal history information, the City must
submit fingerprints to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Currently, the City uses a manual process for fingerprinting of new hires and volunteers.
By doing so, the City is also complying with Education Code § 10911.5 which requires
public recreation program employers to fingerprint each employee having direct contact
with minors and submit them to the Department of Justice as a condition of employment.
This manual process of rolling fingerprints is a lengthy process and takes several weeks
before a response is received from DOJ.
Staff Report — Resolution No. 2001 -XX
Page 2
On June 18, 2001, Captain Alexander Yim of the Walnut/DiamondBar Station
submitted a funding request for station improvements. Included in the request was an
upgrade to the fingerprinting area, specifically for the Applicant Live Scan; this system
allows for the electronic submission of applicant fingerprints and the subsequent
automated background check and response.
Live Scan technology replaces the process of recording an individual's fingerprint
patterns manually through a rolling process using ink and a standard 8"x8" fingerprint
card. The transfer of information using live scan takes a matter of seconds with a
response from DOJ within 72 hours instead of weeks with the current manual process.
In order for the City to submit fingerprints via Live Scan, the DOJ requires a tracking
identification number and a resolution on file that authorizes the City to obtain state and
local criminal` history information. According to DOJ records, the City of Diamond Bar
does not have a resolution on file with DOJ. In order to complete the Live Scan
application, DOJ requires adoption of the attached resolution.
By adopting this resolution, the City obtains the right to secure criminal history
information from the California Department of Justice on all employees, including
volunteers and contractual employees. This does not change current practices but
instead provides the City with a better mechanism to continue what is currently being
practiced, ensures that the interests of the City of Diamond Bar, its employees and
members of the public are protected and helps minimize' potential liability.
Resolution No. 2001 -XX, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney, instructs the
City Manager to enact policies and procedures which will govern the administration of
received criminal history information via Live Scan.
Upon adoption of Resolution No. 2001 -XX, staff will process the necessary documents
associated with Applicant Live Scan submissions.`
Prepared by_
Teresa Arevalo, Senior Administrative Assistant
Todd Strojny, Senior Administrative Assistant
Reviewed by:
David Doyle, Deputy City Manager
Attachment: Resolution No. 2001 -XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OBTAIN STATE AND LOCAL
SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION OF EMPLOYEES
INCLUDING VOLUNTEERS AND CONTRACTEMPLOYEES.
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(10) and 13300(b)(10) authorize the City to
access state and local summary criminal history information for purpose of screening
employees and volunteers; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(10) and 13300(b)(10) require the City to
exclude from employment or volunteer activities persons with certain criminal histories
and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 11105(b)(10) requires the City Council to authorize
specified personnel to have access to summary criminal history information for the
purpose of screening employees (including volunteers and contract employees).
NOW THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Manager and/or his/her designee
for the City of Diamond is hereby given authority to obtain summary criminal
background information from the California Department of Justice for the purpose of
screening employees (including volunteers and contract' employees);
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby
instructs the City Manager and/or his/her designee to enact policies and procedures
which will govern the administration of received criminal history information and which
meet the requirements of the State of California, Department of Justice, Bureau of
Criminal Identification and Information, Field Bureau Operations and Record Security
Section for any agency that maintains or receives criminal history information; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar shall not
consider a person who has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral
turpitude eligible for employment (including volunteers and contract employees), or
licensing; except that such conviction may be disregarded if it is determined that
mitigating circumstances exist, or that the conviction is not related to the employment,
volunteerism or license in question.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF AUGUST 2001
Robert S. Huff, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -
Page 2
001Page`2
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of August, 2001 by
the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members:
Noes: Council Members:
Absent: Council Members:
Abstained: Council Members:
Attest:
City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.��-6t)
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City ManagVN�y
SUBJECT:
Exoneration of Cash Deposit in Lieu of Grading Bond in the Amount $9,504.00 for -Lot -19 of Tract 33417 (3255 S
Diamond Bar Boulevard, Evangelical Free Church of Diamond Bar).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify the owner and
Washington Mutual Bank of this action.
FINANCIAL SSUMMARY:
This action has no fiscal impact on the City
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Department of Community and Development Services is in receipt of a request for grading bond exoneration for
Lot 19 of Tract 334177 (3255 S'Diamond Bar Boulevard, Evangelical free Church of Diamond Bar). A grading bond
(Labor and Materials and Faithful Performance) for improvement security was required in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act. The owner, Evangelical Free Church of Diamond Bar, posted with the City a cash deposit in
lieu of the grading bond on February 3, 2000. The City contract inspector, G.F.B. Friedrich& Associates, confirmed
that all grading
on the grading plan on file with the CitY tothe-grading plan. The City finds that the owner performed all
work as
Prepared by:
John L. Ilasin
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:
Letter of Request, dated July 25, 2001
Certificate of Deposit
Reviewed by:
p,x4a s 11eStefano D d. !_
Deputy City Manager Director of Public Works
CASE DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF GRADING BOND
(FAITHFUy PERFORMANCE, LABOR i'MATZRIAL)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT OF
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
(hereinafter "Financial
Institution") hereby acknowledges
that the ����y.Q1-4 Free rl...,L
(hereinafter "Depositor") has deposited
with Financial Institution the sum of $ 7,5-0e Uv
Financial Institution acknowledges and agrees that,the fore
deposit stands in the namy of
e of the Citgoing
Diamond Bar, a California
municipal corporation (hereinafter the "Cit ►�
Y) , and that the City is the
owner of such account. No funds shall be withdrawn from said account
count
the express, written consent of the City. provided, however,
that any interest earned on the deposit shall belong to the
Depositor. y
Financial Institution further acknowledges and agrees `that ;u
written instructions" from' the Cit Pan
Y, Financial Institution shall
immediately pay to ;the ;City such amount (not exceeding, in the
aggregate, the sum specified above) as may be reguested-b City.
es and grees
g that such funndd
Financial Institution further acknowledges a ys
shall be paid to the City notwithstanding any contrary that
may have been given by the Depositor.
Financial Institution represents to City and warrants t
entire amount of the that the
principle on deposit as .provided herein is insured
`through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Savings and Loan :(FDIC) or the Federal
Insurance corporation (FSLIC).
WHEREFORE, this acknowledgement and consent is executed
Of �ccv�w:�.c, this .:day,
to .2%UU .
14c1011 71 177eQ�zs
�77 FINANCIAL,INSTITUTION:
WASH .INGTOM NVIUAL
BANK. FA /
u�titn' �K
------------
JA! 217 '00 By:
! VLr9PWORMS LO/C-GRADIN. M.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.Io .12?
MEETING DATE: August 21 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of e City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manag
SUBJECT:
Exoneration of Grading Bond No. NA 100304 in the Amount of $163,801.00 for Tract 13594-(2,1951 -Golden
Drive, Country Suites).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify James Econn &
Company Insurance of this action.
FINANCIAL SSUMMARY:
This action has no fiscal impact on the City.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Department of Community and Development Services is in receipt of a request for grading bondexonerationfor
Tract 13594 (21951 Golden Springs Drive, Country Suites). A grading bond (Labor and Materials and Faithful
Performance) for improvement security is required in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act.
Tract 13594 was developed prior to the incorporation of the City of Diamond Bar. A grading a bond was initially
posted with the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, the local governing agency at the time.
The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works has released all records for Tract 13594 including the posted
grading bond to the City of Diamond Bar. Improvements to Tract 13594 were further constructed later through the
development of the now existing Country Suites, but with a posting of a different grading bond. That bond has now
since been exonerated. The Public Works Division finds it appropriate to exonerate the former grading bond.
Prepared by:
John L. Ilasin
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:
Letter of Request, dated July 12 2001
Grading Permit Security with Surety Rider (No. NA 100304)
Reviewed by:
James 6eStefano avid G. Liu
Deputy City Manager Director of Public Works
JAMES ECO'NN & CO. INSURANCE since 1919
`vs YKirlluri 'bo-)uu
GPJIN& PERMIT SECURF
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
�- COUNTY OF. LOS'ANGELES
f DEPARTMENT Ol PUBLIC WORKS
17USLOING AND aAFETY DIVISION
- -r �. t �, j lk . ; •�; i, -�r (/ , ray � w
KNOW ALL HEN By THESE PRESENTS, rnSCCURt TT NUMBER -
Th.t ... ` MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION' T. 1
2, 2029: Century Park East, Suite 81550, Los Angeles; CA 90067
or Los Angeles c,liisrni.,
x NATIONAL.INDEMNITY COMPANY
- pri,ieipwl. and ,.
■ coroor ion, ea surety, are heldandrireLy bound I.—to the Count,. er LUS ANCItrs.' Lad.
E DOLLARS .NO/10;a , O� OOwrpala.(ulfeoueySof thefo atsdaSt.tos.joreif.. pay-9Nt of nicriRED alp- .aE` lTOUSAND EIGHT NtlHDR
L. as meds we heroby Blind'. eurs.lvme, jointly ■ad eamerslly firmly "by th.ae prsoan.La.
i
{' Slgnme, cooled end dated this 4th day of September Is 86
\\^.. WIICREAS, on apolication by the above -nerved principal. ,hag beer,. mad& tii the 0EPaR11fEN1 _
- Or PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY O(.LUS ANCCLES, OivisJon of au, ldii.q and Sef.1T for the i --.,-to void prinelont, of spar—it to perform aseavatie,. or fill sack or both. with — the County
of.. Los Angeles ware womcl(ically described In the : application for a Creding P -wait uses ■
10, tion eon.d b sold prineloal knees ■•:lot , blackN A tract 13574 ,
i— iltyDiamond Barbr a. street adlr..w erGoi ensorinas w/o Grand --I. mcc=ra—cv . ch
- Cha prov;atons *7 .Chapter 10 or the Les AnqI.m Lounty duAldLnq Coca, and -
' WHERCAS, Loa Angeles County Building 'Code, Chapter 70, requires ■■.a .canditia„-pro.
rearm to <the issuance ofsaidpermit that -.-the principal shell furni■d,. a. security in the
- sum abode serval to the County of le■ Angalas, conditioned a. hweeineft.r set rorthe
NOW, THEREFORE. -
tl) If the prial pal camp tali wad 'truly comply with ■11 the applicable requirements
of Las Angeles County auilding Code, Cheater 7U,'. and _
- (2) if oil of the work required to be done aoepliaa with oil o!tho ter., and em.dl� -
-tfa„o a( the Permit rat vicawatlon or rill or bath to the s.
tJ.efoe tion... a f the
941tdi,.q UfrieiaL the„ this obligation *hell be void) otherwise It small remain
In full fares end•:efract..
- :It 1s understood, that the liability or the principal and surety coon this ■eeorlty
*ne 11 be 1. a pact from.: the date-:hortof and remain in effectental the 'camei■tlon
of the mark in camoli's.•,es with all term. ..d eond:itione of said Geadinq Permaq and
.until finial appedvai,thmraar by-the"auildinq afficiei. -
It le further vnder.toad that the Cea„ty -er Low AngeJam, er if.. m—ty, or bath,.
`pr any euthorirsd revrrs.nt.tiv. of .Ltl•*r, -d-ll h.me the right to mater the
-salve described property -:car the purpose:' of lnspeeting the ark. endo. shou Lid the
'prtne20•1' def.ult. Ln tho :perfer.anes of -any of the ter., and conditions of the
- r—dinq' Psr.1L:,; the .aid':. Caunty_i'.-.r .—ty, or both', or agent of ■Atf.er... shell
have the right of access to the property -.and way complete the mark nacmeoery for
- ,compliance with requir•m*nt■ of said Building Cade, Chapter 7a..
''here -the mark requiring this bond is I.Cmtrd ►itliin .n IncUroar.ted city and
u.e County, er Las ■ngele+l 1. the'-..,farcovi—t wq.—Y, the ohltgatAen or M.A.
e■cur,ty shall, .include the incorporated city where the work Is to be performed.
In each ;:7:the wards 'Dmperty-..t or :Puhlle.Walk*. Csm.,ty sf .Lee' A... lea, guild-
', - 'lnq e..d 5.f sty Division'. and 'Building Orfic:ial' snail mos„ such Dra.rtmn.t and
- 'afri.clal rwepettivwiv shale oetl..q, reeoseti.ely, as. the ■Vorcorist.& deosrt-1. -
- 'wad official of --such city. ,1h* words "Los Angeles County erildi„g Code' wa.,.
.the buildlnq.:Code ar ath.r ardrin.,.e■ hsminq d:rov!'s.odm the .nme. a.. or subelam.
- tinily -•!miler -to Chapter 70 or cold Lose Angeiee' County UuAldlng Coat.
.
IN viyNESS wicrtror the oriniep.l snd'.erwty caused't1.io eecurtty to I.e..... tad is..
day and year first ■bore. written:. -
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
(s..r) er/neios y Paul N. Byrnes,-Vit:e Prestnent
ores M. nen, c ary
(Sesl'I Surety
Donald Killian III, Attorney in Fact
(Th,Aa security wu;st be acknowledged both .. to principal -end surety bmfare ■ NprPtart'%volts•)
Loci Nailing Addresa of Surety--^ln T—Pic fa
Prnnn A n. in5s Wi1'.ehiRlv,d-
Los Angeles, Calif. 90010
FOR: OCPART11EXT USE. CULT
►len Ch.ck a-ar.It Nn.- 'Det- Wnrk Cemolet.ed Data S►eurity Rel....d
- '•.FOR OEPARmcmr USE ONLY •_
GP J1NG PERMIT SECURI-
a,r.1t Mw,
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
Data Saeu:Lty Raj....tj
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
r
DE?AATL/ENT, OF PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING ANO'SAFETY DIVISION
CMOY ALL MEM BY tHCSE �
lRE5EN T5, -
,If 'ITT �MBCR
ECUR
MU
FA.t .., MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'
2029 Century 'Park East, Suite 11550, Los Angeles, CA 90067
-or Los Angeles
�PF
:Call/ern}a, ae
v; �
principal. and NATIONAL. INDEMNITY COMPANY I
_
Is 'ePrDpr ten, .a ■ur.ty, are held: and rlr.ty bound a..to ti.. C.ancr
-
it LUs Akerl s. rni_
E DOLLARS;,NO/`10 ''7 O1gO�eerpertto Of the State er Call'lernLb, In tl,e Be- ar9NE HUNDRED FORTY-THREE (THOUSAND
larlvl
.cosy of tl.e Uni Ced Stara., EIGHT HNHDR:
!o b•�.ao. the p•Ay�ent ar
•ter .n Pcn all eras tzq/y
t , ae osteo ner-Or D1nd ourselves, Jointly dud aw erelir. Fl[.1T:'br thea.
preee..la.
Signed. Pealed and' delsd thin 4th September
d.y
of ly 86
\�y •• YIICREAS,
■n POP ilea!len try the .bvve-da.ed� or in"' Da 1, "a been -.d.
Of PUSLIC
to the DCPan Te ckr.
Iuflys, CUUNry or_LU5 ANCCLES, Olvl.ivn Of Bulldi.,q and ssretr
to
ter the i .... n<.
amid prinela.l,:of a Permit to Parrarm msear.tlpn bt x311 Berk or boli. di lni„.the
al. Lo. Anq.Ie. .or♦ rlcally
.pees Caun�ty.
described -in the •pPileati.nlfar 1 Grading Permit upon a
lo2ition adn.a b aald principal k,evn as Lot
N tract 135 4
ldrelityDiagiNd �arbr e. street oddr.ea PF 1 blOeY N A
GO ensorr nes
w/b Gran ip eeaerpanP.
the pre. oleo. . Ch.pe.r 10 Dr tna each
1pa Anp es Cauntr Buaidanq Cvae:, and-
VMEAEAS, -LP. Angela. !aunty Building Coda, Chapter 7U,: requl raw u e .Dodi tionpre-
eecant !e th. Iaaueoce
of told permit that -`the prinei Pal shall furnlah • security In the
■u,. above.-nese• to lha !pont) ar Lou
Angglea, candl'tlonad rte heel niftar :.at fartha
NOW, THCREFURE ,.
II) Ir the principal "'.It -11 and truly em Pit ■it,,'ell the epPllesbla requirements
or Lou Angeles County Building
. Cod., ChoPtar 7U, send
_ t2) lr all ofthe work rwqut;red to be done et.solles rith ■11 or th. ler..
-(fur..
.f ah. Permit for eaeavatlod or rii1 or both. to the utisreolian OF can
can -
al-
9ulldlnq pfriela+.!bass this
'6119"10- .nail be raid!. stherei.. it..n.
In F-11 rare.. end..fr.et. li se..ln
undo raloed-that the llabllity of the prinelpal and surety upon this security
+hell be lq eff.ct fro. securit
the data heraor and ease in In •fleet uutll the co.
.t the avry )n pc.pllsne■ .lib ala tar.. -and I.tlwind
da..ditlone. of said Grading Pv,.tt.
until final spprpaal thewef by the aulldi,rg,.Orfleaal.
It la further und.retaod. that the County of La. Anycl.s,-at the auret b.
or any sutherit.d-representative bull.,.
-how•
or either, ■halt the right to enter the -
above described D.raoert-for theInspecting
' y 'Pu.Daae
renter
er ins . dark, and ..
prineio.t..dit, to tne,:.Ce of or
f
anlthe
thetterm.
,ty.ene. Rn.' term. and eeneltion, of un
O e
Cr adlnq Par.at, the .-id :Caunty,..o r ■urety, Or bath,
ek'.genR of Bather,. shell
)rave the right or access to the prOPerty ;and say Comeltte the •Arlt necessary for
cD.PLlanea eith raquir+
ata .r .aid aulldinq Cads.Lhapter 70.
Vh.r. th- -Or* requiring .thin bond la I.e.tad within n i r.carvorated city and -
lira County ar lOa Angel la
raw the enl.
%c.ent .gcney, the ahllq.tlan or 6A.
eaeurlty •heli Include the /ncerpdret ad city
•here: the week 1. I. be p.rforeed.
1. each C..e the -word. 'D.dP rt..,,; Of Public Yorks, EOv..ty-Of le. A yrled:,�Uulld-
!rq n•a Sefr[y, Olw:reivn' -Building
end Orrici.l- shell ae u. •racer Orv.rt.e,.t avd
Dlflc lel rd.p.p tl vel) M:l'i. eetf..q, rmeveetivelr, the
as wOucgariarte department
end ofr(elal of such rlty. Th. .arae -La". A.,gel.e County: t+aridi..q Cad. -maven
Vie build l,.q even
of etner ordlne�.ee her In.toolcion. the.r ae, or cube tan_ '
dally alealar tp.Chap R.r 70 of ►old Los Anqq. pun
lee C ty. Uuildiug. Coo..
. IM VITMCSS vtrEnr Or the ,Drtn Lcpal and surety caused thLs Security to be evecutad
eek
and .your first 0... .ritt... th.
MARL30ROUGH'DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By
tS..liau 'T-e-
NsrrincSpat,, yrnes,t
ts..t1 S..r.ey areMe r7en. etre Pry
Donald 'Killian III, Attorney in Fact
trh;a es,ur4ty ..at be acknowledged both .a . -to principal endcaret, b..fore w.r.atary Pualtc. 1.
Loc.l Mailing Addr.■a or 4(155 [r t L• rp Blvd-,
Los Angeles, Calif. 9oolo
- '•.FOR OEPARmcmr USE ONLY •_
►t.n:Ch.ek
a,r.1t Mw,
pate Ynr4 Gp.olrt.d-
Data Saeu:Lty Raj....tj
GP JtNG PERMIT SECUR{--
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPART)AENT OF' PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
v
( r �
r"y^ �- tfly
L1
KNOW :ILL MEN.pT THESE FRESCHrSr _ i✓ „ SECURITY NUMBER -
MARLBOROUGHDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'
Th.t ao.
2029 Century Park East, Suite 711550, Los Angeles, CA 90067
.at - Los Angeles cAllforrris,, gm ti y
principal. and
NATIONAL.INDEMNITY COMPANY
\
■ torpor ion, as svrmty. arm held ■r,d firmly bound unto the county er LUS AkCrtrS. a h—,1 -
a cerparata or the state ar C■ilrarnis, In the mu- erQNE HUNDRED. FORTY-THREE'THOUSAND EIGHT HMNDRE
E' DOLLARS.NO/104a , 01..S 00' Iseful volley of lire Unfted States. ,for the payment of wnten sell aria truly
# to be .ads •e heresy bind ourselves, Jointly *ad severally, firmly by these prmawnta.
4th September
5lgned, aeeled and'dsted thin day of ly B6 '
W11CREAS,- an application by .the above-named Principal. haw bars, end& to the DEPAniuc NI
Or PUBLIC WURKS, CUUHfy or, LUS ANGELES, Oivla/an or Buildi.sq and safety, for the issuance,
to said princlpsl, or a permit to Perform *weeration-or fill wort or both`aithi., the County
location owned b gold pri++ctpal kr.o.n so lot- N/A black NIA ding act
135§4u
3 upon e
1pcali yDiamaTod �arbr s..tr,et addre.. orGo en i-ln sew o Gran r erect 1354 ,
or Los An ole■ ■arw gpeeiricsil deacribed In the application far a Grading
S! / in ■ecaras..es wAth
the prow sions a Cho 70 of the Las Angles County.Autiding Coca. and -
WHEREAS,, Lo■ Angeles 'County 'Building CodesChapter70, requires—ex a eondiLiarr pre
cwaent to :the issuance or said permit that the; principal shsLl fuenlrli a security in the:
au,. above ns-ed to the County of Los Angeles, conditioned as hereinafter oat Forth,
NOW. THEREFORE.
(1) If the princloel''shnll wall and truly comply witis all the opplicabLa requiramente
of Lar Angeles County Building -Code, Chapter 7U, and
(2) IF aii of the work rmqulred to be done, eomplleI with all or the terms and rnndl�
tla„a of the Permit for a:eavotlon or fill or both to the satisfaction ' of the
Buildlnq urfiela't than this obligation shall be waidl otherwise It shill ravaln-
in full'fores •n& arrect.
7t.1■ understood that the liability of the principal and surety-uoctr thin security
hall be in orrept from the date horeaf and temein in affect until the complotlon
0r trio work )n eampiianea s['.tt% all ter.e end conditions, of sold Grading Paret:t and
until 'final approval thersaf by the Buildinq Official.
_
It 1s further 'understood that the County of Los A:ngeima, or Lira surwty,'ar butt%,
oranyauthorttad rwpresentatiae of si there--whall be..ethe, right to anter the
above deacrlbod 'property for the purposeofinanerting the work, -,and should the
pr ncioe-1 dof■ult In :the performance -of any of the .ter-a and conditions: of the -
Grsdlnq Prrmlt.';the said County, or surety, or both• or agent of either, shall
nava the right of access to the property and may complete thw mark nrcaasar7 for
eomplianes with requirs.ments of said Building Code Chapter 70, -
'Where the mark reaulrinq this bond in located witlsin on licarpora-ted city ends-
The County or Loa Angeles Is the •%%forcemeat agency, the ohLigmLion of this
security shell Include'-the incorporated city'.whars the work Antobe performed.
In ouch came the words 'Tlepartr�..t nor Public Worka, County of Lao A.,geieb. italic.
iris and Saf.ly 0lvteion' and 'Buildlnq Official' shall ■e■., -auch oepertme..t a,sd'
a rricial rwwouctivelr while acting., -,respectively.,on the 'amoropriate devertvrnt -
end official of suel%city. the words "to. Aageles County Bui-ldinq. Code' meed _
tole bulldihq code or other 'ardinn.ce- having'. proviaaone -tote ones *a. or subsLaa.
tinily similar to Chaptse 70 :or sold Los Angola* County,Uualding Coos,
IN W{1NES5 W%IEnrOr the prin1cpal and surety caused -Lt.Is security to be oweeut■d the
del and year firstabove written.
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPPRA.TJON
_ By
Princ:pa�.,• Paulyrnes,�lCe Yre51 e t
Dolores M. rTen, ecretary
(Seal) Surety
Donald Killian III, Attorney in Fact
(This-a.curi;ty must be acknowledged both as toprincipal and surety before '■'Notary Pualic.)
Local Hailing Address of Surmty:C tin Tnmsc Frnnn & rn - , 1095 Wil chirp Rivrl _ _
Los Angeles, Calif. 90010.
FOR'OEPARTHENf USE ONLr
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA N0.
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manage
9t
SUBJECT:
Exoneration of Grading Bond No. P289-33-63 in the Amount of $11,790.00 for Parcels F & G of Tract 47850 (2859
Water Course Drive, Crystal Ridge Estates).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration and direct the City Clerk to notify the owner and
Reliance Surety Company of this action.
FINANCIAL SSUMMARY:
This action has no fiscal impact on the City.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Department of Community and Development Services is in receipt of a request for grading bond exoneration for
Parcels F & G of Tract 47850 (2859 Water Course Drive, Crystal Ridge Estates). A grading bond (Labor and
Materials and Faithful Performance) is required for improvement security in accordance with Section 66462 of the
Subdivision Map Act. The owner, Diamond Bar West, LLC, posted with the City a grading bond on March 4, 1999.
The City contract inspector, Hall & Foreman, Inc., confirmed that all completed grading work is in general
conformance to the grading plan. The City Engineer finds that the owner performed all work as shown on the grading
plan on file with the City.
Prepared by:
John L. Ilasin
Assistant Engineer
Attachments:
Letter of Request, dated August 16, 2001
Grading Bond (No. P289-33-63)
Reviewed by:
es eStefano David G. Liu
��Deputy City Manager Director of Public Works
cc Kathleen Bryant, Jenkins-Athens Ins. Services
ZF'? ' d 666 ' 01J S3WOH ,0 _r Wti9 Q.
OGILAD INA OND D �B A R BOND NO.P289 33 63
-- ,
PREMIUM: $177.00
(LABOR AND MATkUALS MID FAMNM PEMP24ANCP Project:
KNOW ALL NMN By � gg pP�S °'' Q tr C as, and hereinafter referred'
to collectively' as, "Principal", andKtE�ANGE g 'Y r on or
State of Delaware
Organized existing, under the laws of the
and 4 ly awhorimm to Transact Sttrt:ty business in the Slane of Caftmia as, and hereinafter
referred to as, 'S ', are held and firmly bound unto the City of Diamond Bar, hereinaftr referred to as The
.
"City", m the sum oil 4e. sa Dollars for Faidit Performance 'and f p4r oo Dollars for r
and Materials for the
PaSmmcnt of which Principal and Surety bard themselves. 'their herrn, admiaisaatorsp
and assigns, ,wrntlyand severally as follows:
THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS THAT:
WHEREAS, Principal is the owner of a parcel of land in the City, which it is perform grading
operations and has fled with the City a grading plan and grading application for such parcel of land described
as:'%7 tc X" k Time/ g7DSL au ZRS4 WA&+/tdtMSE� :,ows r+l 74t and
WM3 EAS, as a condition precedent to the approval of said grading plan Principal is required' to deliver to
the City a bond, s=wkg payment an the conoraaor, his subcontractors and to persons renting equipment or furnishing
labor or materials m them for such mpmv== and is the faimai performance of Principal to complete such grading
pursuant to the provisions of the City's Code; and
WIfEREAS, all of such grading is to be pafozmed is accordance with the grading plugs approved by the City
Engineer for such parcel; and
WHEREAS, Principal ,shall perform any cbanges or alterations in the grading required by the City to conform
to approved plans for above said grading; and
WHEREAS, Principal shall compku the grading operations within 3t# (4 ys from die date of
commencement; and ./
WHEREAS, the completion of such grading shall be at the sole cost and expense of Principal.
NOW, THEREFORE, if Pn=pai sbrall faithfully performand shag pay the coatracmr, his subcontractors and
all persons rearing equipment or fumisbmg labor or materials m them for the
full cost of all work as shown on the
grading plan in accordance with the conditions of approval of said 'plan and permit, dren this obligation shall be null
and void.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall not pay the contractor, his subcontractor and all persons renting
equipment or fiunishing labor or maoetials to them Smr the full cost of said approved grading. then this obligation shall
m,.,am in full force and effect' and such contractor. subcontractor, City and persons. shall have a direct right of =don r
against the Principal and Surety under this obligation, subject to the priority of the City.
PROVIDfiD. HOWEVER, if Pancipal shall not fahhfvlty perform an work as shown on the approved grading
plan then this obligation shall remain in full force and effrcL
PROVIDED FURTHER, HOWEVER, that Surety hereby sdpufates and agrees that no change, extension of
dine, almmnon of modificadoo of the contract documents or of the work to -be performed thereunder shall in any way
effect its obligation on this bond and it does hereby waive notice of any such c3range, exmnsioa of time, alteration
or modification of the contract documents or of work to be performed thereunder, and ,
PROVIDED, FURTHER, that in case suit is brought upon. this bond by the City' or any other person who
may bring an action on this bond. a reasonable attorney's fee, to be fazed by the Court, shall be ,paid by Principal
or Surety.
IN WITNESS VVHBREOF, Principal and Surety bave caused these presents to be duly
signed and sealed this 3rd day of February X j0'
(Seal) (Seal)
SUxETYJi.>r�r,►,�► 74 RAMr,
RE
IANCE � RETY GO PANY Pit�rtcrnAz
13Y By.l e. e. l�rc-w,f a Q9 lip.rir.� /�%*�9
By Fn ,1, al By
�athlee Bryant, ttorn y -in -Fact �T, tErf Err iEG.rrr�/
580 California St., #14300
San Francis -c -o. _CA 94104_
0
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.113
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members o he City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City'Manager
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH R.F. DICKSON
COMPANY TO IMPLEMENT A -STREET SWEEPING
DEBRIS COMPOST PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF
$32,410.00; AND AUTHORIZE A CONTINGENCY
AMOUNT OF $5,000.00 FOR PROJECT CHANGE
ORDERS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER,
FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $37,410.00.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
To implement a street sweeping debris compost program to help the City comply
with the AB 939 diversion mandate of: 50% and our anticipated SB 1066 Time
Extension Requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the contract amendment with R.F. Dickson
Company.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The cost of implementing the provisions of the proposed program is fully known
and identified in the accompanying proposal by R.F. Dickson. The projected cost
for a full year is estimated at $32,410.00. For Fiscal Year 2001-02, the approved
budget for street 'sweeping debris compost program under the Integrated Waste
Management Fund is $45,000:00. The compost program will start after
September 1, 2001, representing ten months of operation this fiscal year. It is
noted that the FY 2001-02 budget for street sweeping services (i.e.,without any
compost program) is $128,000.00.
BACKGROUND
Since October of 2000, the City has contracted with R.F. Dickson Company for
municipal sweeping services of its public thoroughfares. Street sweeping is
conducted not only for sanitation and to clean our streets of unwanted debris, but
also to conform to environmental regulations. Street sweeping is mandated by
the Regional Water Quality Control Board as a municipal "best management
practice", and more recently, several cities have arranged for, or conducted,
composting of street sweeping debris as a means to help meet the AB 939
diversion mandate. Since street -sweeping debris collected is normally disposed
at area landfills, the disposal tonnage counts against the City meeting the 50%
diversion mandate. Composting, hence diversion, of street -sweeping debris
provides jurisdictions with additional diversion.
In order to fulfill the good faith effort provisions of the taw and to demonstrate the
intent of the City to fulfill likely time extension requirements to be imposed by the
California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), the City has identified
this as a viable and significant diversion alternative in .its SB 1066 Time
Extension Application to be submitted September 1, 2001.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the information presented in the Background; R. F. Dickson
was requested by Public Works to provide the City with a proposal to expand
their services to include composting of street' -sweeping debris. Dickson
submitted their proposal on July 20, 2001, a copy of which is attached. They
were requested to submit a proposal so as to help the City reach the 50%
diversion mandate. Street sweeping debris composting is a program added by
staff in this fiscal year to help address our shortfall in diversion, and which will be
in our SB 1.066 Time Extension application.
R. F. Dickson estimates that it collects about 490 tons of debris of which 96% is
organic in composition and can be easily composted and diverted from disposal.
Street sweeping debris is collected bi-weekly for a total 'collection of 252 loads
per year. R. F. Dickson will take compostable materials to a processing site in
Placentia (Republic Industries' materials recovery facility) where the debris is
screened to remove contaminants and inorganic contents. About 4% (-20 tons)
is removed and disposed locally at a landfill. The remaining 960/0 will be delivered
to a remote site for composting. The exact site depends upon the cost and
capacity availability of any ',one of several remote compost facilities. End -uses of
the compost are already established, and include agricultural markets. If feasible,
the City will explore- acquisition of some of the compost to distribute locally to
DiamondBar residents.
Composting of the 490 recoverable tons represents about one percent diversion
to the City within the context of its overall waste generation. While this may not
appear to be a large quantity, the diversion is significant in that it demonstrates
the good faith effort of the City to implement alternatives to its menu of programs
identified in the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE), as expected
to be stipulated in the terms of our anticipated SB 1066 Time Extension with the
CIWMB. The Time Extension is required because the original SRRE menu of
programs was inadequate to meet the 50% target. As this debris is already
separated from the normal waste stream, to ignore its segregation, and the fact
that it is 96% compostable, "wastes" an opportunity to obtain easy diversion.
Staff has reviewed other cities' costs and finds that Dickson's pricing is
acceptable. Larger cities, such as Long Beach, have actually reduced their costs
by 25%. However, smaller cities, such as Diamond Bar, do not normally conduct
their own street sweeping, so the cost of composting must be added to the cost
of services. Generally, compost processing is estimated at $35 to $45 per ton
while transportation can range from $10 per ton to over $60 per ton depending
upon distance and specifics of hauling. Deducting avoided costs due to the City
no longer landfilling its debris (about $18 per ton); our net cost for composting is
calculated to be $17 per ton, assuming the lower end of composting cost. R F.
Dickson has proposed its composting cost to be $16 per ton.
The bulk of the cost increase is attributable to the long haul of transporting debris
to a processing/composting facility. There is no local compost site, nor any
transfer operation, so the street sweepers are required to travel a considerable
distance to Orange County, and after processing, further transportation is
required to the remote compost sites. In addition, the street sweepers must travel
back to the area or to other job sites expending time and resources in excess of
normal travel time.
If the City can identify and establish a local transfer site for the debris, then the
delivery costs can be substantially lowered. No such location currently exists. It
will require off-loading of the street sweeper vehicle, with loads to be dumped
directly into transfer trailers. Such a site will likely need a solid waste permit as
street -sweeping debris is considered a regulated solid waste.
Attachments are provided in the form of an Amendment to the City's Professional
Services Agreement for Street Sweeping, and a proposal dated July 20, 2001
from R. F. Dickson.
Prepared by:
J. Michael Huls, REA, Integrated Environmental Services Coordinator
Attachments:
1. Amendment No. 1 and Exhibit"C"
Reviewed b
pip aures DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
avid G. Liu
Director of Public Works
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO THE CITY'S PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
This Agreement (Amendment No. 01) is made and entered into this 21st day of
August, 2001, between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "CITY") and R. F. Dickson Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
"CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals:
(i) The CITY entered into an Agreement with R. F. Dickson Company,
Inc. to provide Street Sweeping Services, which the Agreement was dated September 5,
2000 and was amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 21, 2001 (as amended,
referred to as the "Agreement").
(ii) The term of the Agreement expires September 30, 2005.
(iii) The CITY requested additional Street Sweeping Services to develop
and implement a street sweeping debris composting program as listed
in Exhibit "C".
(iv) The CONSULTANT submitted a proposal, a full, true and correct copy
to provide Street Sweeping Services for the AB 939 Diversion
Program of street sweeping debris at a projected yearly cost of
$32,410.00 (Exhibit "C").
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT:
Section 1: Section '3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:
3. Compensation. CITY agrees to compensate Consultant for
each service, which CONSULTANT performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with
the schedules set forth in Exhibits "A", "B" and "C". Payments will be made only after
submission of proper monthly invoices in the form specified by City
Section 2. Exhibit "C" of this agreement is hereby attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
Section 3. Each party to this Amendment No. 01 acknowledges that no
representation by any party, which is not embodied herein, nor any other agreement,
statement, or promise not containedin this Amendment No. 01 shall be valid and binding.
Any modification of this Amendment No. 01 shall be effective only if it is in writing signed
by the parties.
1
08J151200i 09:29 562-569-5919 PF DICKSON PAGE 03
Aug -16-01 07:32A P-03
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
No. 01 as of the day and year first set forth above:
APPROVED AS TO FORM. CONSULTANT:
BY'. -
City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DATE; _-___._
ra
R. . DICKSON COMPANY, INC.
Steve Dickson a
President
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Robert S. Huff
Mayor
V
.CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA N0. 7- t
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Mana06
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 2001 -XX: Vacating a Portion of Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of Tract 47850 of the Crystal Ridge
Estates.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
This item asks the City Council to conduct a public hearing in accordance with Resolution No. 2001-44: A Resolution
of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Declaring Its Intention to Vacate a Portion of Hawkwood Road within
Lot 28 of Tract 47850 of the Crystal -Ridge Estates in the City of Diamond Bar. After consideration of the evidence
and testimony heard at this hearing, this item then asks City Council to consider a resolution of vacation for this
portion of Hawkwood Road. Action on this resolution must consider the testimony received at the public hearing and
must necessarily find that the right-of-way is unnecessary for the present and prospective public use.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing
and adopt Resolution No. 2001 -XX A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Vacating a Portion of
Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of Tract 47850 of the Crystal Ridge Estates in the City of Diamond Bar.
FINANCIAL SSUMMARY:
Approving the resolution to vacate has nominal but favorable impact on the budget of the City. By vacation of this
portion of right-of-way, the financial risk of the City related to the liability for this street is reduced. Also, the street
operation and maintenance costs are reduced. Both these costs are reduced minimally though and in proportion to
the elimination of approximately 0.02 miles of the approximately 135 miles of public streets in the City.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
This matter is before the City Council because of a request by JCC Homes to vacate a portion of Hawkwood Road
within Lot 28 of Tract 47850 of the private community of the Crystal Ridge, Estates. This request is made to facilitate
the installation of a security gate for emergency services access at this entrance to the Crystal Ridge Estates.
As required by Section 65402 of the Government Code, no street shall be vacated until the Planning Commission has
reported on the proposed location, purpose and extent as to conformity with the General Plan of the City of Diamond
Bar. By Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-21 attached hereto, adopted at its meeting of June 26, 2001, the
Planning Commission reported that the proposed vacation is found to be in conformance with the General Plan of the
City of Diamond Bar.
Page 2
Hawkwood Road Vacation
August 21, 2001
As required by the Streets and Highways Code, rights-of-way established for other purposes shall not be abandoned
unless the governing body determines that the rights-of-way are not use as a non -motorized transportation facility.
The Planning Commission considered this matter at the time it studied conformity with the General Plan of the City of
Diamond Bar. It found and in its said resolution recommended the City Council find that the proposed vacation is not
necessary for a non -motorized transportation facility.
As shown in Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached hereto, the portion of right-of-way to be vacated is all right-of-way for
Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of said tract, excepting the west 55 feet. The installation of a security gate for
emergency services access will be at 55 feet east of the westerly boundary of Lot 28 of said tract. The area of the
portion of Hawkwood Road to be vacated is approximately 5,000 square feet. The existing right-of-way width is 60
feet.
The vacation proceeding is undertaken in accordance with Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The
Code prescribes the procedure and requirements for vacating streets.
The City Clerk has given notice of the date, hour and place of the public hearing by publication for at least two (2)
successive weeks prior to the hearing in a weekly newspaper published and circulated in the City of Diamond Bar
pursuant to Section 8322 (a) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The City Engineer was
authorized and directed to post notices of said vacation conspicuously along the line of said street to be vacated at
least two (2) weeks before the date of said hearing pursuant to Section 8323 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the Stateof California. Additionally, notices have been mailed to all properties within a 500 -foot radius of this portion
of Hawkwood Road.
The public hearing is for the purpose of receiving testimony and hearing evidence offered by interested persons
regarding the declared intention of the City Council. if from all the evidence heard and submitted, the City Council
finds that the street as described in the resolution of intention is unnecessary for the present or prospective public
use, the City Council may adopt a resolution of vacation.
The resolution of vacation may provide for the reservation and exception of easements as may be necessary for
sanitary sewers, storm drains, water lines, public utilities, etc. and may include other conditions as the City Council
finds' necessary. Also, it may provide that the resolution not be recorded until the conditions have been satisfied. Only
upon recordation of the resolution of vacation by the City Clerk in the Office of the County Recorder is the vacation
complete.
As there are existing public utilities within the area proposed to be vacated, the owners and/or operators have been
advised of this request to vacate. Responses have been received from all, and no agencies have indicated that they
object to such vacation. All have indicated that if the existing right-of-way is vacated, they desire that the City retain
suitable public services easements for their existing respective facilities. Relocation of any existing facilities isnot
desired, and therefore the resolution of vacation reserves and excepts an easement for public utilities and public
services purposes over the entirety of the vacated right-of-way and an easement for emergency vehicle access
purposes as shown in Exhibit B attached to the resolution of vacation.
Page 2
Hawkwood Road Vacation
August 21, 2001
As required by the Streets and Highways Code, rights-of-way established for other purposes shall not be abandoned
unless the governing body determines that the rights-of-way are not use as a non -motorized transportation facility.
The Planning Commission considered this matter at the time it studied conformity with the General Plan of the City of
Diamond Bar. It found and in its said resolution recommended the City Council find that the proposed vacation is not
necessary for a non -motorized transportation facility.
As shown in Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached hereto, the portion of right-of-way to be vacated is all right-of-way for
Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of said tract, excepting the west 55 feet. The installation of a security gate for
emergency services access will be at 55 feet east of the westerly boundary of Lot 28 of said tract. The area of the
portion of Hawkwood Road to be vacated is approximately 5,000 square feet. The existing right-of-way width is 60
feet.
The vacation proceeding is undertaken in accordance with Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The
Code prescribes the procedure and requirements for vacating streets.
The City Clerk has given notice of the date, hour and place of the public hearing by publication for at least two (2)
successive weeks prior to the hearing in a weekly newspaper published and circulated in the City of Diamond Bar
pursuant to Section 8322 (a) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The City Engineer was
authorized and directed to post notices of said vacation conspicuously along the line of said street to be vacated at
least two (2) weeks before the date of said hearing pursuant to Section 8323 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the Stateof California. Additionally, notices have been mailed to all properties within a 500 -foot radius of this portion
of Hawkwood Road.
The public hearing is for the purpose of receiving testimony and hearing evidence offered by interested persons
regarding the declared intention of the City Council. if from all the evidence heard and submitted, the City Council
finds that the street as described in the resolution of intention is unnecessary for the present or prospective public
use, the City Council may adopt a resolution of vacation.
The resolution of vacation may provide for the reservation and exception of easements as may be necessary for
sanitary sewers, storm drains, water lines, public utilities, etc. and may include other conditions as the City Council
finds' necessary. Also, it may provide that the resolution not be recorded until the conditions have been satisfied. Only
upon recordation of the resolution of vacation by the City Clerk in the Office of the County Recorder is the vacation
complete.
As there are existing public utilities within the area proposed to be vacated, the owners and/or operators have been
advised of this request to vacate. Responses have been received from all, and no agencies have indicated that they
object to such vacation. All have indicated that if the existing right-of-way is vacated, they desire that the City retain
suitable public services easements for their existing respective facilities. Relocation of any existing facilities isnot
desired, and therefore the resolution of vacation reserves and excepts an easement for public utilities and public
services purposes over the entirety of the vacated right-of-way and an easement for emergency vehicle access
purposes as shown in Exhibit B attached to the resolution of vacation.
Page 3
Hawkwood Road Vacation
August 21, 2001
The matter of present circulation was considered. The street is required for emergency access purposes to the
properties of the Crystal Ridge Estates. All such properties are subject to the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
(C, C & R's) of the Crystal Ridge Home Owners Association (HOA). The resolution of vacation conditioned the
Crystal Ridge HOA to annex all right-of-way for Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of Tract 47850 excepting the west 55
feet and modify its C, C & R's to designate all right-of-way for Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of said tract excepting
the west 55 feet as a public utilities and public services easement and an emergency vehicle access easement.
The matter of future circulation was considered. The existing street system adequately serves the Crystal Ridge
Estates and the properties adjacent to the Crystal Ridge Estates. No extension or interconnection with this vacated
portion of Hawkwood Road appears to be required or desired. Therefore, it does not seem that the portion of
Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of Tract 47850to be vacated is necessary for the present or prospective public use
and consequently no reservation of any easement for future street purposes is included in the resolution of vacation.
Prepared by:
Kirk Phillips, Associate Engineer
John L. Ilasin, Assistant Engineer
Attachments:
City Council Resolution
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-21
Reviewed by:
�sXs DeStefano avid G. Liu
r— Deputy Cit Manager Director of Public Works
p Y Y 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-%i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, ;CALIFORNIA, VACATING A
PORTION" OF HAWKWOOD ROAD WITHIN LOT 28 OF TRACT 47850 OF THE CRYSTAL RIDGE ESTATESIN
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
A. RECITALS`.
(i.) WHEREAS, Hawkwood Road has been dedicated to the City of Diamond Bar for public use, dedicated by
statement of the face of Tract Map 47850, recorded in Book 1225, Pages 89 through 99 inclusive, of maps in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California;
(ii) WHEREAS, on July 17, 2001, the City Council duly passed and adopted: Resolution No. 2001-44
declaring its intention to vacate a portion of Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of Tract 47850 in the City of Diamond Bar,
the general location and extent of which was shown therein;
(iii) WHEREAS, said Resolution fixed 7:00 p.m. on August 21, 2001, in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Auditorium at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 as the time and place for
hearing all persons interested in the proposed vacation, and the date of said hearing was not less than fifteen (15)
days from the date of the adoption of said resolution;
(iv) WHEREAS, it appropriate to consider the vacation of a portion of Hawkwood Road within Lot 28 of
Tract 47850,the location and extent of which is generally described in Exhibit A and shown as "Existing Public Right -
of -Way for Hawkwood Road to be Vacated" in Exhibit B attached hereto.
B. RESOLUTION:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1. That all the facts set forth in Part A -Recitals of this resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. That the portion of Hawkwood Road to be vacated, generally described in Exhibit A and
shown as "Existing Public Right -of -Way for Hawkwood Road to be Vacated" in Exhibit B
attached hereto and made a part hereof, is unnecessary for the present or prospective
public use:
Section 3. That the portion of Hawkwood Road to be vacated, as herein above described, is not
required for anon -motorized transportation facility.
Section 4. That within the portion of Hawkwood Road to be vacated, there are existing public utilities
and other facilities which are required for public convenience and necessity and the City
Council, from such vacation herein ordered, hereby reserves and excepts an easement for
public utilities and public services purposes over the entirety of the vacated right-of-way.
Section 5 That emergency vehicle access is currently provided by the portion of Hawkwood Road to
be vacated. Therefore, the City Council, from such vacation herein ordered, hereby reserves
and excepts an easement for emergency vehicle access purposes as shown in Exhibit B
attached hereto.
Section 6. That the portion of Hawkwood Road herein above described is hereby ordered vacated,
upon satisfaction of the following condition:
The Crystal Ridge Estates Home Owners Association shall annex as common area, as
common area is defined in that Document titled Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and
Restrictions (C, C, & R's) of the Crystal Ridge Estates, the vacated portion of Hawkwood
Road and the 26 foot wide "emergency vehicle access easement" and shall amend the C, C,
& R's to designate such annexed property as "public utilities and public services" easement
and "emergency vehicle access" easement respectively and provide therein a separate class
of standards for the construction, modification, repair, operation and maintenance of "public
utilities and public services" easement and "emergency vehicle access" easement including
requirements for vehicular clearance and access pursuant to Section 10.207' of the Los
Angeles County Fire Code and the approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department a
and minimum requirements for gates to meet Regulation 5 of the Los Angeles County
Prevention Manual, all as approved by the Deputy City Manager and City Engineer of the
Department of Community and Development Services. All such documents evidencing same
shall be recorded concurrently with the recording of this resolution of vacation in the Office of
the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California.
Section 7. That upon recordation of this resolution and the vacation of that portion of Hawkwood Road
described herein above to be vacated, all rights, title and interest in the improvements within
the area vacated shall be vested in the Crystal Ridge Estates Home Owners Association for
the benefit and use of all members of the, Crystal Ridge Estates Home Owners Association.
Section 8. That the City Clerk is directed, only upon satisfaction of the above condition, and concurrent
with the recordation of the documents annexing the vacated area and the documents
amending the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, to record a certified copy of this
resolution of vacation in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles,
State of California.
-2-
o
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of August, 2001,
Robert S. Huff, Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
Number 2001- was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
California, at its regular meeting held on the 21st day of August, 2001, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LYNDA BURGESS, CITY CLERK
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
-3-
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
TANGENT
Cl
101.87'
370.00'
15'46'27"
51.26''
C2 '
67.08'
400.00'
9'36'32"
33.04'
C3
61.48'
430.00'
8'11'29"
;31,34'
C4
4.85'
71.00'
68'28'27"
72.43'
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-21
l t
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.Z
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Linda C. Lowry, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2001 -XX adopting the Local Implementation
Report (LIR) and certifying that the City of Diamond Bar.
meets the conformity criteria of the 1999 Congestion
Management Program (CMP).
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Adopt the Local Implementation Report (LIR) which tracks development activity
and transportation improvements in the City of Diamond Bar and certify that the
City of Diamond Bar meets the conformity criteria of ' the 1999 Congestion
Management Program (CMP).
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -XX adopting the Local Implementation Report (LIR) and
certifying that the City of Diamond Bar meets the conformity criteria of the 1999
Congestion Management Program (CMP).
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The City of Diamond Bar receives various gas taxes, State and Federal Funds as
sources for Public Works operations and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP).
The City must report its compliance with Congestion Management Plan
requirements annually. If the City does not comply, the State may withhold our
monies for non-compliance.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) was enacted by the state
legislature with the passage of Assembly Bill 471 (1989), as amended by
Assembly Bill 1791 (1990), 1435 (1992), 3093 (1992),'1963 (1994), and 2419
(1997). The passing of -the CMPstatute was aimed at addressing congestion
relief and the diminishing quality of fife occurring in many communities. The
requirements of the CMP" became effective with voters' approval of Proposition
111 in June 1990. The 1997 CMP is incorporated by reference into the 1`999
CMP and together comprise the 1999 CMP. The Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) is the agency responsible for
the administration of the CMP:
The CMP requires the City to track development activity and transportation
improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. Development activity is associated
with debits and transportation improvements generate credits. The intent is to
balance the two factors. The CMP requires jurisdictions to adopt and submit to
LACMTA a Local Implementation Report (LIR), which states the City's positive
balance. Those jurisdictions with negative balance, are in noncompliance with the
CMP, which may result in ,the withholdingof gas tax revenues or eligibility for
transportation grant funds.
The purpose of the LIR is to demonstrate that the City of Diamond Bar complies
with the requirements of the 1999 CMP. According to the 1999 CMP, the LIR
must include the following:
• Resolution of Conformance;
• Deficiency Plan Status Summary;
• New Development Activity report; and
• Transportation Improvements Credit Claims.
The City of Diamond Bar, based on its construction and demolition activities
occurring between June 1, 2000 and May 31, 2001, generated 2,242 debits for
such projects as Farmer Boys, an office building in Gateway Corporate Center
and the church on Brea Canyon Road. These debits were offset by the City's
transportation credit claims that totaled 2,617 points and the carry-over credit of
62,250 points. Based on the City's ability to achieve a positive credit balance of
62,625 points (62,250+375), the City will remain in compliance with the 1999
CMP.
Prepared By:
Linda Kay Smith
Development Services Assistant
Attachments
1. Resolution 2001 -XX
2. City of Diamond Bar 2001 Congestion Management Program Local
Implementation Report
Reviewed b
.fir---
J eStefano Dav d G. Liu
Deputy City Manager Director of Public Works
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP
LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089
A. RECITALS.
(i) The Los Angeles County >Metropolitan Transportation
Authority ("MTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los
Angeles County, adopted the 1999 Congestion Management Program on
December 2 1999; and
(ii) The adopted CMP- requires that MTA annually determine
that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP
requirements; and
(iii) The adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP
local implementation report by September 1, 2001; and
(iv) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held a noticed
public hearing on August 21 2001.
B. RESOLUTION:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
Section 1 That the City Council has taken all of the following actions, and
that the City of Diamond Bar is in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the 1999 CMP.
By June 15, 2001,the City of Diamond Bar conducted the annual traffic
counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections,
consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway
System Chapter.
The City of Diamond Bar has locally adopted and continues to implement
a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum
requirements identified in the CMP` Transportation Demand Management
Chapter.
1
The City of DiamondBar has locally adopted and continues to implement
a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements
identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter.
The City of Diamond Bar has adopted a Local Implementation Report,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements
identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to
growth within the City of Diamond Bar with transportation improvements, and
demonstrates that the City of Diamond Bar is meeting its responsibilities under
the Countywide Deficiency Plan.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority.'
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of August, 2001.
Robert S. Huff
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, _adopted and approved at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on 21 sr day of
August, 2001, by the following votes
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:"
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
2
City Of Diamond Bar
Date Prepared: 16 -Aug -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
Contact: Daavid G. Liu
Phone Number: 909 396 5671
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
20 01 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUSSUMMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section 1]
................ (2,242)
Exempted Dwelling Units
0
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section il]
.................. 2,617
Land Use Strategy Claims
0
Capital Improvement Claims
4
Transit Claims
0
TDM Claims
3'
Total Strategies Claimed
7
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal)
......... .... I.... 375
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (2000)
Local Implementation Report
.........`......... 62,250
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance;
.................. 62,625
JENTER JURISDICTION NAME Date Prepared:
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31,'2001
SECTIONI - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
A DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
16 -Aug -01
Category Dwelling
Units
Debit
Value/DU
Debits
Single FamilyResidential 90.00
x
6.80 =
612
Multi-FamilyResidential 0.00
x
4.76 =
0
Group Quarters 0.001
x
1.98 _
0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value/1,000SF
Debits
Commercial (less than 300,000 s .ft.) 0.00
x
22.23 _
0
Commercial 300,000 s .ft. or more 0.00
x
17.80
0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 2,78
x
66.99' =
186
NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category' 1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value/1000SF
Debits
Lodging 0.00
x
7.21 =
0
Industrial 0.00
x
6.08 =
0
Office (less than 50,000 s :ft.) 0.00
x
16.16 =
0
Office(50,000-299,999 s .ft.) 129.40
x
10.50 =
1,359
Office 300,000 s .ft. or more) 0.00
x
7.35 _
0
Medical 0.00
x
16.90 =
0
Government 0.00
x
20.95 _
0
Institutional/Educational 12.90
x
7.68- =
99
Universi# 0.00
x
1.66 =
0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips,
Attach additional sheets if necessary) Enter "0" if none)
Debit
Value/Trip
Debits
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
x
0.71 =
0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
x
0.71
0
Subtotal New Development Activity
2,256
Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2
=
14
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points)
_
(2,242)
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME Date Prepared: 16 -Aug -01
2001 CMP Local 'Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total.
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may claimed only -for 1) development permits that were both issued and
revoked,expired or withdrawn during; the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the
reporting eriod.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
Units
Adjustment
Value/DU
Subtotal
Single Family Residential
2.00
x 6.80 =
14
Multi -Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76- -
0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 =
0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment
Value/1000SF
Subtotal
Commercial less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
x 22.23 =
0
Commercial 300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
x 17.80 ° =
0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.001
x 66.99 -
0
NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category 1000 Gross
Square' Feet
Adjustment
Value/1000SF
Subtotal"
Lodging 0.00
x 7.21 _
0
Industrial 0.00
x 6.08 -
0
Office less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
x 16.16 =
0
Office 50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00
` x 10.50 =
0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
; x 7.35, =
0
Medical 0.00
x 16.90 _
0
Government 0.00
x 20.95' _
0
Institutional/Educational 0.00
x 7.68 _
0
University 0.00
x 1.66 =
0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description Daily Trips
Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0" if None)
Adjustment
Value/Trip
Subtotal
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.001
x 0.71 _
0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.001
x 0.71 -
0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points)
=
14
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME Date Prepared: 16 -Aug -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 MAY 31, 2001
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
LowNery Low Income Housing
High Density Residential
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
near Rail Stations
Development Agreements entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
0 Dwelling Units
0 Dwelling Units
01 1000 Gross Square Feet
01 Dwelling Units
01 1000 Gross Square Feet
01 Dwelling Units'
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Units
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Units
0
1
Exempted DevelopmentDefinitions:
1. LowNery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows:
Low -Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low -Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family si
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passengE
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Secti
65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destro,
to the extent' of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calan
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations a
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locall,
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR,
LIR-2001 diamond bar WITH DELETES FOR COUNCIL(4. Exempt Dev Act) Section I, Page 4
City of Diamond Bar Date Prepared: 16 -Aug -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION II.a - LAND USE CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Land Use Projects: o Total Land Use Credits (Points): o
7. Str.
Name:
Diamond Bar BI @ Tin Dr
8. From/To:
Enter
9. Intersection:
Diamond Bar BI @ Tin Dr
10. Map, Page:_ Enter'
11. Participants:
0
12. MTA Funding:
0%
13. Your share of local funding: 100%
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100%p
15. Other Info:
Signalize Intersection with right and left turn
16
17 1 1L_X 19
20 21 22
23 24
144.00"
144 2001 1 $125
100% 3 0 J
100% 144
LIR-2001 diamond bar WITH DELETES FOR COUNCIL (7. Capital Improvement Claims) Section II.b, Page 1 .
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME Date Prepared: 16 -Aug -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION IF.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 4 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 2,169
1 2 3 General use lane on Other Major Arterial 5. Scope 6. Units
4 212.2 4 Diamond Bar BVTin Dr/Crestview Dr. 0.1 lane -mile
7. Str. Name: Diamond Bar BI
8. From/To:' 0
9. Intersection: Tin Dr/Crestview Dr. right and left turn lanes 10. Map Page: Enter
11. Participants: 0
12. MTA Funding: 0°l° 13. Your share of local funding; 100%
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100%
15. Other Info: Added right and left turn lanes on Diamond Bar B
16 17 18 1 19 1 20 21 22 23 24
2900.00 290 2001 $50,000 100% 3 0 100% 290
City of Diamond Bar Date Prepared: 16-Aug-01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION <II.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Transit Projects: o Total Transit Credit (Points): a
w
City Of Diamond Bar Date Prepared: 16-Aug-01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: 1, 3 ITotal TDMCrediit (Points): 448
1 321.0 CMP TDM Ordinance 1 145.08 [1000 gsf
Non-Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section
No other description/entries required for this strategy. This is already done for you.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0.30 44 n/a n/a 100°1a 3 n/a 100%° 44
::<::«::
1 2 3 Remote Access to Gov't Info/Transactions 5. Scope: 6. Units:
2 354.00 1 4 City On-Line 1 343 1 daily log-in
inter. zero (0 )rf.queetion dices nat appl
7. Total employees in program: 0
8. Total employers: 0
9. Operator of Transit Service: 0
10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: 0%
11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: 280
12. Facility/Center Address: 0
13. Daily Parking Rate: $0.00
14. Fee Increase: $0.00
15. Other Info: The City's Website is functional for gathering information, applications, etc. and has
I
updated with informationrequests, too.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1.40 480 1995 $4,800 100% 3 78 100% 402
1 2 3 Remote Access to Gov't Info/Transactions S. Scope: 6. nits:
3 354.00 4 Info to Go Automated Telephone Information and Reque 4 daily Jog-in
i=rater zero (� Ott question. does no: apply
7. Total employees in program: 0
8. Total employers: 0
9. Operator of Transit Service: 0
10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: 50%
11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: Enter
12. Facility/Center Address: 0
13. Daily Parking Rate: $0.00
14. Fee Increase: $0.00
15. Other Info: This program was initiated in October 2000 as an automated information system with
information for all Departments and services.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1.40 6 2000 $4,800 100% 1 0 40% 2
LIR-2001 diamond bar WITH DELETES FOR COUNCIL (10. TDM Claims) Section II.e, Page 1
MEETING DATE:
TO
VIA:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.73
August 21, 2001'
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Linda C. Lowry, City Manage4u�
James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 26235 — A request by C&A
Developers and Diamond Bar East Partners to subdivide two
vacant residential parcels totaling 5.5 acres into three lots for
the future construction of three custom single-family
residential dwelling units.
RECOMMENDATION: It recommended by the Planning Commission that the City
Council approve the application with the Findings of Fact
and the conditions as listed within Resolution No. 2001 -XX.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Diamond Bar East Partners, and property owner, C & A Developers,
have submitted an application for Tentative Parcel Map 26235 and are requesting the
approval of plans to subdivide two parcels of land totaling 5.5acres, into three (3) lots.
The project site consists of lots 12 and 13 of Tract 48487, which are located on the
southwesterly side of Oak Knoll Drive at its easterly terminus'. The General Plan Land
Use designation is Rural Residential (RR) and the zoning is Heavy Agriculture (A-2-2).
Surrounding development consists of custom single-family homes with minimum lot
sizes of 1 acre.
The subject ,property was previously analyzed as a component of Vesting Tract
Map 48487. That project consisted of the creation of fifteen (15) custom home lots
upon a 19.998 -acre site at the terminus of Windmill Drive. The City Council's approval
of Tract Map No. 48487 incorporated development conditions and 'environmental
monitoring measures necessary to ensure that the provisions of the certified Master
Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 were implemented. BonTerra Consulting
prepared a five-year Mitigation Monitoring Program. The City Council approved the
Vesting Tract Map in the 1990's and it was subsequently recorded. The 19.998 acre
site is presently being graded for the future development of single-family homes.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning Commission reviewed the subject Tentative Parcel Map at its regular
meeting on July 24, 2001. The Commission found that the proposedsubdivision was
consistent with the goals and objectives of the adopted General Plan, the requirements
of the City's Development Code and the regulations of the State and local subdivision
codes. The Planning Commission adopted'a Resolution recommending that the City
Council conditionally approve the proposed division of land.
Pursuant to the City of Diamond Bar's Subdivision Ordinance, the advisory agent is the
Planning Commission, who recommends approval, conditional approval, or disapproval
of all Tentative Maps to the City Council. The City Council has the responsibility to
approve, conditionally approve or deny subdivision requests.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The project site is zoned Heavy Agricultural (A-2-2). Its General Plan Land Use
Designation is Rural Residential (RR). Generally, the land uses surrounding the subject
property include Single -Family Residential, R-1, 20,000 to the north and west. The
vacant property located to the east and south is in the County of Los Angeles (City of
Diamond Bar Sphere of Influence) and it has been pre -zoned A-2-2.
Vesting Tract Map No. 48487 was approved by the City of Diamond Bar and recorded
on October 30, 1995. The zoning of the tract map was a combination of the County of
Los Angeles Zones R-20,000 and A-2-2. The subject property (Lots 12 and 13 of
Tract 48487) are zoned A-2-2 because the minimum lot size is 2 -acres.
Subsequent to the approval and recordation of the Vesting Tract Map No. 48487, the
City of Diamond Bar adopted its Development Code. The Development Code
establishes new zone districts and it provides a matrix to show the relationship of the
old County of Los Angeles zones to the new City of Diamond Bar zone districts.
Section 22,06.040 of the Diamond Bar Development Code establishes the matrix
(see Table'2-2 "Zoning Consistency Matrix").
The City's adopted General 'Plan recognizes the subject property as Rural Residential
(RR). The City is under an :obligation to make its zoning consistent with the General
Plan Land Use designations, The City's Development Code establishes Rural
Residential Development Code Standards as the applicable category for review of the
proposed project (see Section 22.06.040). Chapter 22.04 of the Diamond Bar
Development Code establishes provisions for the Interpretation of Development Code
Provisions. Section 22.04.020-F-1 indicates that if there is a conflict between the
zoning district regulations and allowable 'land uses, the General Development
Standards shall control.
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Rural Residential (RR). The
Development Code (Section 22-06.040)'' establishes various zones to determine
consistency with the land use designation. The General Plan requires that the
maximum density shall be one dwelling unit per acre. The applicable development
2
standards shall be Rural Residential. The staff is suggesting' that Section 22.Q8.040 of
the Development Codebe used to establish the development standards. for the
proposed subdivision. The Rural Residential standards have been used for the review.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
The City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance implements the provisions of the State
Subdivision Map Act (hereafter referred to as "Map Act"), Sections 66410 et seq. of the
California Government Code. Map Act Section 66426 requires that any subdivision or
re -subdivision of >land shall require the filing and approval of a Tentative Map. The
Tentative Map review process is used to evaluate the compliance of the proposed
subdivision with the standards detailed in the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the
appropriateness of the proposed subdivision design. Furthermore, Chapter 21.22 of the
City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance requires that a parcel map be filed for the
subdivision of four or fewer_, parcels. In compliance with Chapter 21.03 of the
Subdivision Ordinance, the City of Diamond Bar is authorized to approve all
subdivisions through the approval of a map or other entitlement.
SUBDIVISION DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
The purpose of the established standards for design and layout of the subdivision, and
the design, construction or installation of public improvements within the subdivision are
to provide consistency of development with respect to the General Plan, Subdivision
Ordinance, and any applicable Specific Plan. As required by State Subdivision Map Act
Section 66411.1, improvements required for subdivisions of four or fewer parcels shall
be limited to the dedication of rights-of-way, easements, and the construction of
reasonable off-site and on-site improvements for the parcels being created.
The original City Council approval of Tract No. 48487 contained a number of conditions,
which remain relevant to the proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235 The applicable
conditions and requirements of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, the Biological Mitigation
Monitoring Plan, and all unfulfilled conditions of Tract No. 48487 will remain in effect.
Additionally, the 'proposed subdivision will adhere to subdivision design and
development standards provided in the Subdivision Ordinance, adopted by the City
Council in 1999.
The underlying two parcels that are being proposed for reconfiguration are described as
follows:
3
Approx.
Lot
Lot
Gross
Net
Pad
St.
Average
Average
Density
No.
Area
Area
Area
Frontage
Width (ft.)
Depth (ft.)
(du/gross
(ac.)
(ac.)
(ac.)
(ft,) to St.
ac:)
Centerline
12
3.04
2.84
0.-
248
475
264
.329
13
2.44
2.18
0.-
356
339
260
.410
3
When analyzing TPM No. 26235 in the context of the original Tract No. 48487, the
following changes are reflected:
Total Tract
Area (ac.)
Total
Parcels
Project
Density
Approx.
19.998
15
Lot
Lot-
Gross
Net
Pad
St.
Average
Average
Density
No.
Area
Area
Area
Frontage
Width (ft.)
Depth (ft.)
(du/gross
(ac.)
(ac.)
(ac.)
(ft.) to St.
ac.)
Centerline
1
1.5
1.3
0.5
245
230
295
.667
2
1.9
1.6
0.7
310
264
302
.526
3
2.1
2.0
0.8
89
368
259
.476
When analyzing TPM No. 26235 in the context of the original Tract No. 48487, the
following changes are reflected:
Resultant lot densities for the three (3) proposed parcels under TPM° No. 26235 are:
0.476 du/gross acre, 0.526 du/gross-acre, and .667 du/gross acre. The General Plan's
land use designation for the project is Rural Residential (RR) which allows for a
maximum density of one (1) du/acre. The three proposed lots conform to Diamond
Bar's General Plan density requirement for the RR land use designation.
Rights -Of -Way Dedications
Right-of-way dedication requirements have been fulfilled as part of the City Council
approval of Tract No. 48487. Public access to the subject property is provided by Oak
Knoll Drive. The applicant will be required to construct drive approaches within the
public right-of-way in accordance with City standards.
Easements
Access to public and private utilities, including electricity, gas, water, sewer, storm
drains and telecommunications services must be installed as part of the improvements
within all subdivisions as provided in Section 21.30.110 of the City of Diamond Bar
Subdivision Ordinance. The required easements have been recorded as part of Tract
No. 48487.
Cl
Total Tract
Area (ac.)
Total
Parcels
Project
Density
Original Tract No. 48487
19.998
15
.750
Incorporating TPM 26235
19.998
16
.800
Resultant lot densities for the three (3) proposed parcels under TPM° No. 26235 are:
0.476 du/gross acre, 0.526 du/gross-acre, and .667 du/gross acre. The General Plan's
land use designation for the project is Rural Residential (RR) which allows for a
maximum density of one (1) du/acre. The three proposed lots conform to Diamond
Bar's General Plan density requirement for the RR land use designation.
Rights -Of -Way Dedications
Right-of-way dedication requirements have been fulfilled as part of the City Council
approval of Tract No. 48487. Public access to the subject property is provided by Oak
Knoll Drive. The applicant will be required to construct drive approaches within the
public right-of-way in accordance with City standards.
Easements
Access to public and private utilities, including electricity, gas, water, sewer, storm
drains and telecommunications services must be installed as part of the improvements
within all subdivisions as provided in Section 21.30.110 of the City of Diamond Bar
Subdivision Ordinance. The required easements have been recorded as part of Tract
No. 48487.
Cl
Off-site and On-site Improvement
Off-site and On-site Improvements have been addressed as part of the previous
approval of Tract No. 48487. The proposed project represents a reconfiguration of two
parcels of land into three lots. Approximately 4,000 cubic yards of material will be
moved to create the new subdivision configuration. The proposed grading is consistent
with the surrounding neighborhood and the approved grading plan for Tract 48487. The
proposed building pad elevations will be simi'lar to those approved as part of Tract
No. 48487. The conditions of approval relative Tract No. 48487 will remain applicable
to the proposed project.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Master - Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 (VTM) (MEIR) was prepared in
conjunction with Vesting Tract Map 48487, which contains the subject TPM 26235. The
VTM was approved and the EIR certified by the Council on June 2, 1992, by the
adoption of City Council Resolution 92-34.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235 proposes changes with regard to lot configuration only,
and the proposed project is in substantial conformance with the analysis conducted
under the former MEIR. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21166, the lead agency is prohibited from requiring
subsequent reports for a certified project in the absence of substantial changes, which
would impact the findings of the MEIR, or the introduction of new information which was
unknown at the time of MEIR preparation.
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the
previously certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 for Tract No. 48487
according to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California
Code of Regulations. No further environmental review is necessary.
CONCLUSION
The design and development of the proposed subdivision is appropriate with the
existing surrounding neighborhood. The use of land within the proposed subdivision will
be consistent with surrounding residential developments. The site is located in the
Rural Residential (RR) General Plan Land Use designation, which mandates a
maximum of one developed unit/acre. After the proposed subdivision, all three lots will
be in conformance with the applicable zoning designation and land use requirements.
Therefore, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235 is consistent with the goals and objectives
of the Diamond Bar's General Plan.
TPM 26235 proposes the subdivision of two existing parcel of land into three (3) lots.
The project meets all requirements of the. Diamond Bar Development Code, the
Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, the State Subdivision Map Act, and is in
conformance with the Diamond Bar General Plan. All conditions of approval for the
parent Tract No. 48487 will be applicable to the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. All
5
environmental mitigation measures specified in Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2
will be applied to the proposed subdivision. The existing mitigation monitoring plans will
be used for the proposed project. Proposed grading will substantially' conform to the
approved Tract No. 48487, Subsequent development of the project will conform to all
requirements of the Diamond Bar Development Code.
With respect to Tentative Parcel Map 26235, the City Council has the following options:
1. Approve the Tentative Parcel Map as submitted;
2. Approve the Tentative Parcel Map with conditions; or
3. Deny the proposed Tentative Parcel Map
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
On August 10, 2001, the project was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin; every property owner within a 700 -foot radius of the
subject property was sent a notice of the public hearing; a notice of public hearing
display board measuring at least 4 foot by 6 foot was posted at the subject site and
displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing; and a notice of public hearing:
was posted at three public places.
REQUIRED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS:
(a) The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific
Plans,
(b) The design or improvement of the proposedsubdivision is consistent with
applicable General and Specific Plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development;
(d) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;
(e) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat;
(f) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not Likely to
cause serious public health or `safety problems;
(g) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use
- of, property within the proposed subdivision. (This finding may be made if
the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will
be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones
previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to
6
easements of record, or to easements established by judgement of a court
of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is granted to the review
authority to_ determine that a public at large has acquired easements of
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision);
(h) The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the
community sewer system will not result in violation of existing
requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board;
(i) A preliminary soils report or geological hazard report indicates adverse
soil or geological conditions and the subdivider has provided sufficient
information to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or Council that
conditions can be corrected in the plan for the development; and
(j) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the
City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and
any other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, and the Subdivision
Map Act.
MANDATORY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Section 21.20.090 of the City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance requires that the
review authority adopt the following mandatory conditions of approval along with the
approval of a Tentative Map:
1. Require that parcels, easements or rights-of-way be provided for streets, water
supply and distribution systems, sewage disposal systems, storm drainage
facilities, solid waste disposal, and public utilities providing electric, gas and
communications services, as may be required to properly serve the subdivisions.
Easements for public utilities shall be limited to those needed to provide service
to present and future development;
2. Mitigate or eliminate environmental problems identified through the
environmental review process, except where a Statement of Overriding
Consideration has been adopted in compliance with CEQA
3. Carry out the specific requirements of Chapters 21.30 (Subdivision Design and
Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and
Agreements) of this Title;
4. Secure compliance with the requirements of this Title and the General Plan
5. Require that any designated remainder parcels not be subsequently sold or
further subdivided unless a certificate or conditional certificate of compliance
(Chapter 21.28) is obtained in compliance with this Title; and
6. Require the dedication of additional land for bicycle paths, local transit facilities
(including bus turnouts, benches, shelters, etc.), sunlight easements, and school
7
sites, in compliance with Map Act Chapter 4, Article 3, where required by the
General Plan.
OPTIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Pursuant to Section 21.20.090 of the City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, the
review authority may also require the following optional conditions of approval:
1. The waiver of direct access rights to any existing or proposed streets;
2. The reservation of sites for public facilities, including fire stations, libraries, and
other public uses in compliance with Map Act Chapter 4, Article 4;
3. Time limits or phasing schedules for the completion of conditions of approval,
when deemed appropriate; or
4. Any other conditions deemed necessary by the review authority to achieve
compatibility between the proposed subdivision, its immediate surroundings, and
the community, or to achieve consistency with City ordinances or State law.
Prepared by:
LDM Associates
Planning Consultant
ATTACHMENTS:
1: Draft Resolution of Approval;
2. Planning Commission Resolution No.2001-26
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235;
4. Tract Map 48487 Overlay for Subject Parcels;
5. City Council Resolution No. 92-34 dated June 2, 1992;
6. Applications.
REVIEWED BY:
�(L ames DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26235 AND ENVIRONMENTAL
EXEMPTION SET FORTH HEREIN FOR A 3 -LOT SUBDIVISION
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF OAK KNOLL
DRIVE IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
A. RECITALS
(1) WHEREAS, the property owner,, C & A Developers and the applicant,
Diamond Bar East Partners, have filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235 to
subdivide two parcels of land totaling 5.5 -acres into three (3) lots for the
eventual development of three custom single-family homes. The project site
is located on the southwesterly side of Oak Knoll Drive of its terminus in
Diamond Bar, California; and
(ii) WHEREAS, the Planning Commissionheld a duly noticed public hearing
regarding the proposed subdivision and, adopted its Resolution No. 2001-26,
recommending that the City Council conditionally approve the proposed
project; and
(iii) WHEREAS, notification of a public hearing before the City Council has been
made in accordance with the provisions of the City's Development Code; and
(iv) WHEREAS, on August 21, 2001, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on TPM No. 26235. The public
hearing was opened and comments were received.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
B. RESOLUTION
Section 1 The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
Section 2 The environmental _ evaluation demonstrates that the proposed project is
within the scope of the previously certified Master Environmental Impact
Report No. 91-2 for Tract No. 48487. Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article
11 of the California Code of Regulations, no further environmental review is
necessary because the proposed project is considered a minor land division
and the potential impacts of this project have been previously evaluated in the
Master EIR. The circumstances and impacts evaluated in MEIR No. 91-2
have not changed. No new information has been made` available that would
have a bearing on the findings, °conclusions and mitigation measures included
DRAFT
in the previously considered EIR. The mitigation measures set forth in the
MEIR are included as conditions of approval of this proposed project.
Section 3 The City Council declares that the information contained in the staff report,
the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-26 and testimony given at the
public hearing are incorporated in this resolution and comprise the basis upon
which the following findings have been made:
(a) The proposed project relates to two partially graded parcels that are
vacant and contain approximately 5.5 -acres:
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of RR (Rural
Residential Maximum One Dwelling Per Acre). It is zoned A-2-2 (Los
Angeles County Heavy Agricultural) and the corresponding City of
Diamond Bar Rural Residential (RR).
(c) Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north and
west R-1, 20,000 and to the east and south A-2-2.
(d) The request for approval of TPM 26235 is a request to subdivide two
parcels of land totaling 5;5 -acres into three lots for the future
development of three custom single-family homes.
(e) The approximate gross land area of the lots proposed under TPM 26235
is: Lot 1: 1.5 ac., Lot 2: 1.9 ac., and Lot 3: 2.1 ac. Respective net land
areas, exclusive of road easements is: 1.3 ac., 1.6 ac., and 2.0 ac.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
(f) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and applicable
Specific Plans.
The General Plan's land use designation for the project area is Rural
Residential (RR) which provides for a maximum of one (1) du/acre. TPM
26235 proposes three lots varying in size from 1.5 to 2.1 gross acres,
with an average lot size of 1.8 gross acres. The project's overall density
is 0.55 dwelling units per gross acre. Therefore, the proposed TPM
26235 is consistent with the City's adopted General. Plan. There is no
specific plan applicable to the subject property.
The proposed project is designed utilizing the standards and guidelines
established in the City's Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance.
This will ensure that the proposed project is in 'compliance with the
adopted General Plan.
(g) The design or improvement of theproposed subdivision is consistent
with applicable General and Specific Plans.
The General Plan's land use designation provided for the project area is
Rural Residential (RR max. 1 du/acre). TPM 26235 proposes three lots
2.
DRAFT
varying in size from 1.5 gross acres to 2.1 gross acres, with an average
lot size of 1.8 gross acres. Therefore, the proposed TPM 26235 is
consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. There is no specific
plan applicable to the subject property.
(h) The site is physically suitable for the type of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 -acres, which will be divided
into three lots. Gross lot sizes vary from between 1.5 acres to 2.1 acres.
The proposed development for this site will be one (1) custom single-
family home per parcel. The site has adequate access to public/private
streets and all public infrastructure." The site is similar in terms of
topography and size to the surrounding developed neighborhood.
(i) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 -acres with a resultant density
of .55 dwelling units per acre. The density is consistent with the
provisions of the Development Code and the adopted General Plan.
(j) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or; injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat.
All substantial environmental issues have been examined and
addressed by the certifiedMaster Environmental Impact Report No. 91-
2. Additionally, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) was prepared, and
TPM 26235 will adhere to the guidelines and measures addressed in the
adopted MMP.
(k) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health or safety problems.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems due to the following:
(1) Conditions and mitigation measures have been imposed
regarding the grading of the subject property in order to
stabilized the property and that a factor of safety of 1.5 or better
must be achieved before building permits will be issued for the
construction of dwelling units;
(2) No active faults transect the project site and the project site is
not located in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
Therefore, the potential for ground rupture is minimal.
Additionally, the expected ground .shaking levels are within the
range of current engineering practices for construction of
habitable structures. The project is not located within an
identified' significant hazard area. All buildings and structures
3
D , n
RAFT
must be designed and constructed in accordance with the
provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC); and
(3) The proposed project will comply with the required standards of
the Los Angeles County Fire Department. A fuel modification
plan, appropriate access and turnarounds for fire equipment,
and fire hydrants in appropriate locations with adequate flow
are conditions of approval, as specified by the Fire Department.
(1) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at Targe for access
-through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
Conditions of approval are incorporated into the project which provide
for future street easements, the installation and maintenance of utilities,
slope and drainage easement, and "restricted use" area easements and
appropriate access easements. Therefore, the design of the subdivision
and improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the
public at large, for access through or the use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
(m) The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the
community sewer system will not result in violation of existing
requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board.
The proposed project will not violate existing requirements of the Walnut
Valley Water District.
(n) If a preliminary soils report or geological hazard report indicates adverse
soil or geological conditions, the subdivider has provided sufficient
information to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or Council that
conditions can be corrected in the plan for the development.
All soils and geological hazard concerns have been considered and
adequately addressed by the Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted as a
condition of approval of Tract Map 48487.
(o) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of
the City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code,
any other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, and the
Subdivision Map Act.
The proposed project meets all the requirements of the City of Diamond
Bar Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, Diamond Bar Municipal
Code, and the Subdivision Map Act.
Section 4 The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 26235 subject to
the execution and/or fulfillment of all conditions set forth in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2001-26 which is attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
4
DRAFT
Section 6 The City Council shall
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail
to Diamond Bar East Partners, 3480 Torrance Blvd., suite 300,
Torrance, CA 90503
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF AUGUST, 2001, BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY:
Mayor
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, held on the
21 st day of August, 2001, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar
5'
PLANNING COMMISSION
00py
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ' NO. 26235 AND THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION SET FORTH HEREIN FOR A 3 LOT
SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF OAK
KNOLL DRIVE IN DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS.
1. The property owner, C & A Developers and the applicant, Diamond Bar East Partners,
have filed a Tentative Parcel Map Application (TPM No. 26235) to subdivide two parcels
totaling 5.5 acres into three (3) lots for the eventual -development of three custom single-
family homes. The project site is located on the southwesterly side of Oak Knoll Drive at
its terminus in Diamond Bar, California;
2. ' On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal
corporation of the State of California. Subsequently, the Diamond Bar City Council
adopted its Development Code (Title 22) and Subdivision Ordinance (Title 21). Titles 21
and 22 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code contain the review, criteria applicable to
TPM 26235.
3. Notification of the Applicant's public hearing has been made in accordance with the
provisions of the City's Development Code.
4. On July 24, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on TPM 26235. The public hearing, was opened and comments
were received.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City
of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct:
2. The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the
previously certified Master Environmental Impact Report No 91-2 for Tract Map 48487.
Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations, no further
environmental review is necessary.
3. The Planning Commission declares that the information contained in the staff report and
testimony given at the public hearing are incorporated in this resolution and comprise the
basis upon which the following findings have been made:
(a) The proposed project relates to two partially graded parcels that are vacan, and
contains approximately 5.5 acres.
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of RR (Rural Residential
Maximum One Dwelling Per Acre). It is zoned A-2-2 (Los Angeles -County
Heavy Agricultural) and the corresponding City of Diamond Bar Rural Residential
(RR).
(c) Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north, and west
R-1 20,000 and to the east and south A-2-2:
(d) The request for approval of TPM 26235 is a'request to subdivide two parcels of
land totaling 5.5 acres into three lots for the future development of three custom
single-family homes.
(e) The approximategross land area of the lots proposed under TPM 26235 are: 1.5
ac., 1.9 ac., and 2.1 ac. Respective net land areas, exclusive of road easements
are: 1.3 ac., 1.6 ac., and 2.0 ac:
Tentative Parcel Mag
(f) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and applicable Specific
Plans.
The General Plan's land use designation for the project area is Rural Residential
(RR) which provides for a maximum of one (1) du/acre. TPM 26235 proposes
three lots varying in size from 1.5 to 2.1 gross acres, with an average lot size of
1.8 gross acres. The project's overall density is 0.55 dwelling units per gross acre.'
Therefore, the proposed TPM 26235 inconsistent with the City's adopted General
Plan.
The proposed project_ is designed- utilizing the standards and guidelines
established in the City's Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance. This will
ensure that the proposed project is in compliance with the adopted General Plan:
(g) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with
applicable General and Specific Plans.
The General Plan's land use designation provided for the project area is Rural
Residential (RR max. 1 du/acre). TPM 26235 proposes three lots varying in size
from 1.5 gross acres to 2.1 gross acres, with an average lot size of 1.8 gross
acres. Therefore, the proposed TPM 26235 is consistent with the City's adopted
General Plan.
2
(h) The site is physically suitable for the type of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 -acres, which will be divided into three
lots. Gross lot sizes vary from between 1.5 acres to 2.1 acres: The proposed
development for this site will be one (1) custom single-family home per parcel.
The site has adequate access to public/private streets and all public infrastructure.
The site is similar in terms of topography and size to the surrounding developed
neighborhood:
(i) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 acres with a resultant density of .55
dwelling units per acre. The density is consistent with the provisions of the
Development Code and the adopted General Plan.
(j) The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
All substantial environmental issues have been examined and addressed by the
certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2. Additionally, a Mitigation
Monitoring Plan (MMP) was prepared, and TPM 26235 will adhere to the
guidelines and measures addressed in the adopted MMP. .
(k) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems due to the following:
(1) Slope instability will not occur due to the introduction of project features
like shear keys and the removal of landslide.. areas along the western and
eastern facing slopes;
(2) No active faults transect the project site and the project site is not located
in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Therefore, the potential, for
ground rupture is minimal. Additionally, the expected ground shaking
levels are within the range of current engineering practices for
construction of habitable structures. Therefore, the project is in an area
that does not r pose significant hazard when structures are designed in
accordance with the UniformBuilding Code (UBC) Structures for this
project will comply with the standards of the UBC through the City's permit
process; and
(3) The proposed project will comply with the required standards of the Los
Angeles County Fire Department. A fuel modification plan, appropriate
access and turnarounds for fire equipment, and fire hydrants in
3
appropriate locations with adequate flow are conditions of approval, as
specified by the Fire Department.
(I) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property
within the proposed subdivision.
Conditions of approval are incorporated into the project which provide for future
street easements, the installation and maintenance of utilities, slope and drainage
easement, and "restricted use" area easements and appropriate access
easements. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and improvements will not
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or the
use of property within the proposed subdivision.
(m) The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer
system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the .
California Regional Water Quality Board.
The proposed project will not.violate existing requirements of the Walnut Valley
Water District.
(n) If a preliminary soils report or geological hazard report indicates adverse soil or
geological conditions, the subdivider has provided sufficient information to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer or Council that conditions can be corrected in the
plan for the development.
All soils and geological hazard concerns have been considered and adequately
addressed by the Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted as a condition of approval of
Tract Map 48487.
(o) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City of
Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, any other applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act.
The proposed project meets all the requirements of the City of Diamond Bar
Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, Diamond Bar Municipal Code, and the
Subdivision Map Act.
findings tforth above, the Planning Commission hereby
4 Based e
commendsCy Council approval of TPM 26235 subject to the followingi
conditions:
a. General:
(1) The project site shall be developed in conformance with: TPM 26235, the
unmodified components and conditions of approval of Tract Map 48487 as
delineated in Diamond Bar City Council Resolution No. 92-34 and the
site's Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
4
(2) The project site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris
both during and after construction, addition or implementation of the
entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse,
whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the
property owner, applicant, or, duly permitted waste contractor, who has
been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation and
disposal of solid waste from residential, .commercial, construction, and
industrial areas within the City or it shah be the -applicant's obligation to
ensure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the
City of Diamond Bar to provide such services.
(3) This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and
owner of the property have filed within 15 days of approval of this map, at
the City of Diamond; Bar's Community and Development Services
DepartmentlPlanning Division, their Affidavit I of Acceptance stating that .
they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval
Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pays all
remaining Planning Division processing fees.
(4) In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9 (b)(1), the
applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void or annul, approval of TPM 26235 brought :within
the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37:
(5) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric
Code, and all ,other applicable construction codes, ordinances and
regulations in effect at the time of grading and building permit issuance.
(6) The proposed TPM 26235 is exempt from further environmental review as
it is in substantial compliance with the Master Environmental Impact
Report. Because the project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA it is
also exempt from the fee requirements of the State Department of` Fish
and Game as set forth in Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(7) Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not limited to
Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Division,
Engineering Division, and school fees) at the established rates, prior to
final map approval, issuance of building or grading permits (whichever
comes first), as required by the City. Additionally, the Applicant shall pay
all remaining fees prior to the Map's recordation as required by the City.
(8) All`equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. The
staging area, including, material stockpile and equipment storage area,
shall be enclosed with a six foot high chain link fence. All access points to
5
the fenced area shall be locked whenever the construction site is not
supervised.
(9) TPM 26235 is valid for two years. The applicant may file for a one-year
extension of the City's approval in the event that the application for
extension is file with the City at least 30 days prior to the expiration date.
(10) The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with
the conditions of this approval and applicable laws, and other regulations.
(11) Prior to the granting of any occupancy permits, all conditions of approval
and improvements shall be completed or bonded for, to the satisfaction of
the City.
b. Plannina Division
(1) Applicant shall adhere" to all conditions of approval as _delineated in
Resolution 92-34, adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
on June 2nd, 1992.
C. Fire Department
(t) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions of approval as delineated in
Resolution 92-34, adopted by City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
on June 2^d, 1992.
d. Public Works/Engineering Department
(1) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions of approval as delineated in
Resolution 92-34, adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
on June 2^d, 1992.
-The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Diamond
Bar East Partners, 3480 Torrance Blvd., Suite 300, Torrance, CA 90503.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JULY 2001, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY:
Bob Zirbes, Chairman
6
�-� - .� i � OO�.O"lYib IYwu' i-Ir•t s
F -
V'
1:7(a3a. `�� g -pt•... + luN
x i3 i $s
Si
cv
• s
twig
CL
LU
j IRS
R.
iTT
1
BCD r � s // .ice • �� � � a a
!. FNMQs �$t; i 1 , ;a�'1! jrr, ifig 11
�48� $fig;
el ti t j I ? {
Ll kggE k$ic;
Ila
<
In 110N
N
1717
NO
I II
/ i W r r r P-1i
fi r
it H
s
v -'� I f *•11't �' file � r - �Y rr"1 �`'� � a -
u •
1 ?tat 14 {} �. ! Qlj r•
IJ.
1 � '
1
� ' f
.`�, YY Fttt 11 � �_•' �./ t k y 1 -4 7 1 1 i� j i 1 f i f �•.•_.� �� -
-
'q1 t
1 L �. `'. ; t. { � tare°' •°" ;iw:33•
UA
C*3
� N
cm
i�
lot s $t
_'a _ I
Y' '< r
p - j
3•, ��' C ri. �t (! j ! i Y tea+
. a
lb
AJI c 9
•rr _ } .,TL r , 1 , r_�-Y � -`fit 4�
. IDD ° +�
fib
cm
LLJ
!.
f �1b
,
.moi .v jt;\-; � •- -- i�1 ��. ���' �q.�s�%S ;•-���
Fill I
co
C IN
1 ' j
�- ,�' , r t .._•vs•— IIs'. -7
--j� ' �r qtr �'_.:�'^ � �! 6 �" '�` ' , ��'i'•��f � '�'� -
- r
r • - /tf'-r 'M�!/,/ .' O.`-
I
Z. F1� j7 fi i W
` •+ 1@ al l;i ,azn. _. � �f(7/fi � 17.t f t ( r fl O l.O, � f '�
• fF
!
,
. - y .i �''y;, , x.+111 ,t � � i < 1,} r � � •''+ �
` \ i�4 'j'1a1M•, o h � t ? � ' � l s f { moi:: -_ '--
I
Ej
` { \•�; �j Q= µ11I �; t ±� i\.,,t1 `• �'1 '—.-.h {--- .c—�
1 a '
''• � S ' �1l a [•- ' . ., t i §
iir,f t i.•
-
1�-4%f\\rsjffi
" -
Y
I
.a 1 I i
,..1� �{ . —... _ _'ria' i.., , 1 l � � 1 j , 6 . • . , ,
C(0,py
PLANNING COMMISSION`
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26235 AND THE
ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION` SET FORTH HEREIN FOR A 3 LOT
SUBDIVISION LOCATED' ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF OAK
KNOLL DRIVE IN DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS.
1, The property owner, C & A Developers and the applicant, Diamond Bar East Partners,
have filed a Tentative Parcel Map Application (TPM1 No. 26235) to subdivide twc parcels
totaling 5.5 acres into three (3) lots for the eventual development of three custom single-
family homes. The project site is located on the southwesterly side of Oak Knoll Drive at
- its terminus in Diamond Bar, California.
2.: On April 181, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as'a duly organized municipal
corporation of the State of California. Subsequently, the Diamond Bar City Council
adopted its Development Code (Title 22) and Subdivision Ordinance (Title 21). Titles 21
and 22 of the Diamond Bar `'Municipal Code contain the review criteria applicable to
TPM 26235.
3. Notification of the Applicant's public hearing has been made in accordance with the
provisions of the City's Development Code.
4. On July 24, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted'a duly
noticed public hearing an TPM 26235. The public hearing was opened and comments
were received,
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City
of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the
previously certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 for Tract Map 48487.
Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations, no further
environmental review is necessary.
(h) The site is physically, suitable for the type of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 -acres, which will be divided into three
lots. Gross lot sizes vary from between 1_.5 acres to 2.1 acres. The proposed
development for this site will be one (1) custom single-family home per parcel.
The site has adequate access to public/private streets and all public infrastructure,
The site is similar in terms of topography and size to the surrounding developed
neighborhood.
(i) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5acres with a resultant density of .55
dwelling units per acre. The density is consistent with the provisions of the
Development Code and the adopted General Plan.
(j) The design of the subdivision or ,the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
All substantial environmental issues have been examined and addressed by the
certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2. Additionally, a Mitigation
Monitoring Plan (MMP) was prepared, and TPM 26235 will adhere to the
guidelines and measures addressed in the adoptedMMP.
(k) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems due to the following;
(1) Slope instability will not occur due, to the introduction of project features
like shear keys and the removal of landslide areas along the western and
eastern facing slopes;
(2) No active faults transect the project site and the project site is not located
'in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Therefore, the potential for
ground.' rupture is minimal. Additionally, the expected ground shaking
levels are within the range of current engineering practices for
construction of habitable structures. Therefore, the project is in an area
i
that does not pose significant hazard when structures are designed in
accordance with the Uniform Building Code` (UBC). Structures for this
Pr.oject will comply y with the standard's -of the
UBC
throu h the City'spermit
process; and
(3) The proposed, project will comply with the required standards of the Los
Angeles County.Fire Department.- t. A fuel
modification cation
.plan, appropriate
access and
turnaro
and
s
for fire equipment, and fire hydrants in
3,
(2) The project site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris
both during and after construction, addition or -implementation of the
entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse
whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the
property owner, applicant, or duly permitted waste contractor, who has
been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation and
disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and
industrial areas within the City or it shall be the applicant's obligation to
ensure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the
City of Diamond Bar to provide such services.
(3) This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and
owner of the property have filed within 15 days of approval of this'map, at
the City 'of Diamond Bar's Community and, Development Services
Department/Planning Division, their Affidavit of Acceptance stating that
they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. "
Further, this approval ;shag not be effective until the applicant pays all
remaining Planning Division processing fees,
(4) In accordance with Government Code Section !66474.9 (b)(1), the
applicant shall: defend, indemnify, and hold harmless from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void or annul, approval of TPM 26235 brought within
the time period; provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37.
(5) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted -Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform °Plumbing Code, National Electric
Code, and all . other applicable construction codes, ordinances and
regulations in effect at the time of grading and building permit issuance.
(6) The proposed TPM 26235 is exempt from further environmental review as
it is in substantial compliance with the Master Environmental Impact'_
Report. Because the project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA it is
also exempt from the fee requirements of the State Department of Fish
and Game as set forth in Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(7) Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not limited to
Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Division,
Engineering Division, and school fees)at the` established rates, prior to
final map approval, issuance of building or grading= permits (whichever
comes first), as required by the City. Additionally, the Applicant shall pay
all remaining fees prior to the Map's recordation as required by the City.
(8) All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. The
staging area, including, material stock pile and equipment storage area,
shall be enclosed with a six foot high chain link fence. All access points to
5
Jul-26-0I'1248p
P. 14
to proposed building envelopes.
Aestricted'use areas and, structural
setbacks shall be considered And
delineated prior to recordation of
the final trap.
(c)
Soil remediation measures shall be
designed for a "worst case"
geologic interpretation subje=t to
verification in the ,field during
grading. '
4
(d)
The extent of any remedial grading'
into natural areas shall be clearly
I,
defined on the grading plans.
(e)
Areas of potential for debris flow
shall be defined and proper
rem edial measures implemented as
approved by the city Engineer.
,
(f)
Gross stability of all fi 11sl oP es `
shall be analyzed as part of
geotechnical report, including,
remedial fill that replaces natural
slope
(g)
Stability of all proposed slopes
shall be confirmed by analysis, as
approved by the City Engineer.
(h)
All geologic data including
13
Jul -3.6-01' 12:48P
P_12
C.
be.approved by the City Engineer prior
l
'
to final map approval.
10.
Street names'shall be submitted for
lty
review and approval prior to approvallof
L
the final Snap. Streetnames shall no
duplicate ekisting streets withinthe
City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip
code areas."
Ii
House numbering plans shall be approved
Y the City Engineer prior to issuance)
Of building permits.
f
€
12.
The detail d rawings and construction
II
nates shown on the submitted plans are)
ponce tual
P only.: -.and the a PProva2 of th�s
mag does not constitute approval of said
notes, '..
13 .
Lot of line ad ,us
_7tme nt between Tracts 47851
and 48487 shall be approved prior to'
3.--ecordation pf the final- map.
14.
Grading of the subject 7 property shall b�
in accordance with the Uniformrauilding
Code, City Grading Ordinance 14 (199o)
and acceptable grading practices. The
precise grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the.grading
k
11 ,
Jul -16-01' 12:47P
P.1O
Ii
C
S,
g
7. All hydrants shall be brass or bronze,
i
and conform.to current AWWA standard
6503 pr,,approved equal. All hydrants
shall be installed a minimum of 25' from
a structure or ;protected by a. two ,(2)
hour fire wall`.
(c) ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:
1. All easements existing prio{ to final,
Map -approval -must be identified. If an
easement is blanket or indeterminate in
nature; a-s--tatement to that effect must
be shown on;the final map in lieu of its
location.
2. A title.reportfguarantee showing all fee
owners and interest holders must be
submitted when a'final map is submitted
for plan check. The -account shall
remain .open until the final --map is filed
with the County Recorder. ; in updated
titie'report/guarantee must be submitted
II
�
II
ten (10) working days prior to final map
approval — ,
3. Applicant shall submit to the City
1�
Engineer the total cost estimate for
bonding purposes'of all public
9
Jul-1-6-0 V 12:47P
P.06
(f,)
Neither , the: design. . of the subdivision nor the
types of improvements will cause serious
public°.health problems, since sewage
disposal, storm drainage, fire protection alnd
-geological and soils 'factors are addressed Iin
the conditions of approval appended hereto.
(g)
The design of the subdivision provides, to
the extent feasible, for'future passive or
natural, heating or'cooling opportunities_
The design of the subdivision is based on the
size and shape of[ the parcel. .
(h)
The proposed subdivision does not contain or
front upon any public Waterway,' river,
stream; coastline, shoreline, lake or
reservoir.
The subdivision and development of the
property, in the manner set forth on themap
will not unreasonably interfere with the free
and complete exercise of public; entity and/or
public, utility rights--of-way and/or easements
within the area covered by said, map, since
the, design d development as set forth in
theconditions of approval and on the
tentative map provide adequate protection for
any such easements,:
5
.]u1-16-01 12:46P a
P.03
s i
pursuant. to"the terms and provisions of California Government
Code § 65360.
(iv) on September 23 and November 25, 1991" the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar"conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on"the subject matter of the Application
and, upon conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning
Commission adopted its Resolution No. 91.-25 recommending approval
of the Application to this City 'Council.
(v) on January 21, January 28 Marc h 3, April 7 and
April 21,, 1993, the City Council of the City"of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the App
(vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. ResclutiOr►.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is- found, determined and resolved
by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
2,
In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, part
A, of this Resolution. -
2• The City council hereby certifies that
Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 was cOM14eted in compliance
with the California Environmental'Quality Act of 1970 as
amended, and the Guidelines
9 thereunder,'
the promulgated thereunder the City
Council has reviewed and considered the info'
rmatio3r contained in
said Environmental Impact Report No.,91-2 and that said
Environmental Impact Report reflects the independent judgment of
the City of Diamond Bar.
Z ,
I
YES NO POSSIBLY
10• Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
X a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances
(including but not limited to, oil, pesticides. chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset condition?
X
b. Probable interference with as emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
I1. Population. Will the proposal:
a. Alter *the location distribution, density, or growth rale of the human
population of an area?
1'2- Housing. Will the proposal affect:
X
a. Fasting housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in;
a.
Generation of Substantial additional vehicular movement?
b Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new paring?
c• Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
d•Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and goods.
e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f• ' Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14 Public Services. Will the proposal:
a• Have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or altered
governmental services in anv of the following areas:
1 Fire Protection?
2. Police Protection?
3 • Schools?
4 4. Parks or other recreational facilities?
$• Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? `
6. Other governmental services?
II. Environmental Impacts:
ubmilMed ons and additional es) informction to supplemenr all yes" and possibly- answers are required to be
submitted "on attached sheets)
YES NO POSSIBLY
I • Earth. Will the proposal resW t in -
2. a.
Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures?
X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
X
C. Chart a in topography pography or ground surface relief features?
X d• The destruction, coverins
or modification of any unique geologic or
physical feature?
X e• Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the
site?
X_ f Changes in deposition, erosion of stream banks or land adjacent to
standing wa'er, changes in siltation, deposition or other processc s
which may :modify the channel of c1 1onstant or intermittentlyflOW SlP
standing wafer?
water as well ?the areas surrounding permanent or intermittent
X g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar
hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal, result in:
a Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b• The creation Of Objectionable odors?
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any
changes in climate, either locally or regionally?
3 • Water. Will the proposal result in:
a
Changes in :urrents or the course or direction of water movemea ;?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface run-off?
t•
c. Alterations of the, course or flow of flood waters?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any body of water.... -
e• Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water
quality including but not Iimited to dissolved oxygen and turbidity?
f• Alteration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters?
X
the '
g• Change ' to quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by
cuts or excavations?
Jul -16-01 12:49P
P.19'
Prior to finali2ation of any development
phasg, `sufficient drainage improvements
shall be completed beyond the phase
boundaries to assure secondary access
and 'drainage protection to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Phase boundaries shall correspond to l
t
- lines shown on the final map.
II
33. Prior to placement'of any dredged or
fill material into any U.S.G.S. blue
line'stream4bad, a 404 permit shall be
`
obtained from the Army corps of
Engineers and an agreement with the
jCalifornia
V
Department of Fish and Game
I
shall be obtainedand submitted to the
City Engineer.
i�
34. Each dwellin unit shall
11 b
e serves by a
separate ,sewer lateral which shall not
cross any other lot lines. The sanitary
�i
sewer system serving the tract shall :be
connected to the City sewer system.
Said system shall be of the size, grade
h
and depth approved by the City Engineer,
County Sanitation District and Los
j
Angeles County Public Works De artm
P ent,
it {
prior to approval of the final map.
is
Jul-16-01 12:51P-
P.
to defray the cost of imnlementat
on and
monitoring by City staff and consultants
retained by city.
•
ExterlOr construction activities
(grading, framing, etc.) shall be
restricted to 7•
. 0 oa.m. .-
to 5•00 p:m.,.
Monday through Saturday, except that
intkrior building construction
activities shall not be limited. All
construction equipment shall be properly
muffled tOl reduce noise 1'evels.
Transportation of equipment and
materials And operation of heavy grading
equipment shall also be limited to the
hours of 7':00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. All
equipment staging areas shall be sited
an the subject y
Property
P . Dust generated
by construction activities shall b::
iedu.ed.by watering the soil priory
and c-ring grading activities. Use of
'
reclaimed water shall be used whenever
Possible.
6• All lots shall be redesigned to provide
a minimum pad'size of 10,000 square
feet.
24
I
Jul -16-01 12:51P
- P.27
transplanted trees shall be shown on the
detailed landscape plans.
11. Applicant shall -contribute $2,500.00
:.as
its pro rata share for the Ecological
1
Concept study for Tonner. Canyon and SEA
No. 15.
12- Applicant shall pay development fees
(including, but not limited to,
planning,'building, and school f±es)
at
the established rates prior to is
I
Of ; building permits.
13. Applicant shall prepare, and submit to
the Director of Community`Development
{
for approval: prior to the sale of the
first lot of the subdivision, a "BuY er
Awareness Parka "
ge which shall include,
but not'be limited to, informdtiorr
pertaining t07 geologic issues e a
r rdxa
g g
theert ro '
P P y, wildlife corridors, oak
and walnut. tree preservation issues, the
existence and constraints pertaining to
S£A,Na. 15 and Tonner ,Canyon,
explanatory information pertaining to-
orestrictions
r strIctionton use Ofpropertiesas
necessary and similar related flatters.
Applicant shall institute a program to
26
..
+ Jul-26-o1 12:51P
P_28
r
include delivery of a
Copy of said
"Puyez Awareness Package" to each
prospective,
purchaser and shall keep on
•.
file in the office of A pplicant-a
'
receipt signed by each such prospective
Purchaser indicating that the
Prospective purchaser has received and
read the infOrm tion
contained within
the "Buyer,Awareness`Package.n
Applicant shall inco,
rporate within the
cc&Rs a reference to the availability
of
the 'Buyer Awareness Package" and the
fact that a co PY thereof is on file-in
the office of the City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar.
8. The City Clerk is hereby
y directed to
to the
(a) Gertify
ado tion
P of this :Resolution,
certfiedcopy
and (b) forthwith transmit a
of this besolut
receipt
Rian ,v y cert' ified mail ► return
requestedto the Applicant at its address
records.
per City
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 2nd day
1992.
4 of June
Mayor Pro Tim'_..
27 ,
CITY OJ" iA.NViOND BAR
COMMUI+a DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FPL # f' -
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Deposit's
->;
(909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Receipt#
��- By
-77
Dates Reed
Record Owrtgr Applicant Applicant's Agcnt
HUNSAName C & A DEVELOPERS DIAMfiND BAR EAST PARTNERS TTN: Pa & ASSOCIATES
(Last name first) (Last name first) ATTN: Paul DeP First), . (Last name first)
Address 3480 TORRANCE BLVD. 3480 TORRANCE BLVD. 2900 ADAMS'STREET, i6A-15
SUITE 300 SUITE 300
City TORRANCE, CA TORRANCE. CA RIVERSIDE CA
tip 90503 90503
_92504
Phone( -)310/540-3990 Phone-) 310/540-3990 Phone) 90g/352-7200
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in %:*ruing of any ,change 'of the
principals involved during the processing of th,scase. `
(Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and
directors of corporations.)
Consent :1 Sertify I 10 am r ner a erein desdnb.rfweu�J2,ndpygg,a
p ' ant t ate you a ues
L`
(All reco oumus
) L4�y EL�I�d� /d�l�iltf :Date
Cern cation: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is
correcr to the best of my knowlede
Prim tot
-
Sided Dateiis.. 1/
(Applicant or Agent)
Location OAK KNOLL 'DRIVE '(LOTS 12 & 13 OF TRACT AQ 87)
(Stre_t address or tract ano Iot number)
betwe`a _
and s
(Street) (Street) 3 7
Zoning R-1-20-,•000, A2-2
HNM
Previous Cases TENTATIVE TRACT 48487
Present Use of Site VACANT; GRADED FOR SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
Use applied for SFR (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
Domestic Water Source WALNUT VALLEY
Company/District WATER DISTRICT
Niethod of Sewave Disposal' L A. COUNTY
Sanitation District UNITATTt7N DTSTRTCT
Environmental Information Form for Residential Projects
(To be completed by applicant)
OASTREE STATEMENT
NARRATIVE ATTACHMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 26235
APPLICANT: DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS/C&A DEVELOPERS
REPRESENTATIVE: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
This Project consists of subdividing two single-family lots into three single-family lots, a net increase of "
one single-family residence. The portion of the lots containing the building envelope has already'been
graded and this existing graded area will be slightly reconfigured to accommodate the additional lot.
Consequently, no additional areas of disturbance will be created by the project and there will be no 'impact
on natural areas, landform, drainage courses, biological resources, etc. In addition, because the area is
already developed for residential uses and is served with utilities and public services; the incremental
increase of one unit will have no noticeable impact upon consumption of natural resources, generation of
waste products or service by public agencies/utilities.
YES NO POSSIBLY 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
X a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X b• Substantial increase in demand upon existing energy sources or
require the development of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in:
X a. A need for new systems, or Substantial alterations to public utilities?
17. Human Health. Will the Proposal result in:
X a. Creation of any health hazard ox
mental health)? potential health hazard (excluding
X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
X a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or
will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to the public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in:
X a. An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
Opportunities?
20• Cultural Resources." Will the proposal result in:
h a. The alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
X b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or tbject?
h C. A physical change whi :h would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
X d• Restrictions On existing religious or sacred uses within the
impact area. potential
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance?
X a. Does the proposed project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels,. threaten to eliminate or significantly reduce a
Plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
YES NO
POSSIBLY
... ... 10.
Risk of Upset. Will ,the proposal result: in:
X
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances
(including but not limited to, oil, pesticides; chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset condition?
X
b. Probable interference with an emergency response plan or, an
emergency evacuation pian?
11.
Population. Will the proposal:
X
a. Alter the location, distribution, density, or ;growth rate of. the human
population of an area?
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect.
X
a. Existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13.
Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
X
a. Generation of Substantial additional vehicular movement?
X
b. Effects on" existing parking facilities or demand for new parking?
k ` X
C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
X
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and goods.
X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air`tmffic?
X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14.
Public S, r vices. Will the proposa"c
-
a. I ,ave an effect upon, or resAt in the need for new or altered
!
Vvernmental services in any of the following areas:
J - X
1. Fire Protection?
X
2. Police Protection?
X
3. Schools?
X
4. - Parks or other recreational facilities?
X
5. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
X
6. Other governmental services?
11. EnviromnentalImpacts:
i
(Explanations and additional information to supplement all 'yes' and 'possibly' answers are required to be
submiugd ,on, attached sheets)
YES NO POSSIBLY
<1.
Earth. ' Wilt the proposal result in:
X
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures?
X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or'overcovering of the soil?
X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or
physical feature?
X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the
site?
X
f Changes in deposition, erosion of stream banks or_lazd adjacent to
standing water, changes in s: +tation,deposition or otl- �r processes
which` may modify the channel of constant or intermittently flowing
water as well as the,• areas surrounding permanent or intermittent "
standing water?
X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar
hazards?
2.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
X
a. Substantial air emissions or, deterioration of ambient air quality?
X
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
X
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any
changes in climate, either locally or regionally?
3.
Water. Will the proposal result in:,
X
a. Changes in currents or the c Burse or, direction of waL r._movemeuts?:
X
b. Changesin absorptionrates, drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface run-off?
X
C. Alterations of the course or flow of flood waters?
X
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any body of water?
X
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water
quality including but not limited to dissolved oxygen and turbidity?
X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
X
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by
cuts or excavations?
SUMMON CHECKLIST
G. List of Owners Submit on gummed labels two lists, certified to be correct by affidavit,. of names and
addresses of all per ; shown on latest assessment roll as owner` c subject property and of property
within a distance of *)w foot radius from all boundaries of proposed'iand division. Include the names and
addresses of the applicant, agents and owners.
is a rondo
by affidavtet project
Warnes and addresses
submit on gummed labels one list, certified to be correct
of 'all tenants of the project.
H. Ownership Map - Submit one copy of a map indicating locati
subject property. Scale: I' = lo0 feet. on of ownerships within a SOO foot radius of
I. Assessor Maps - Submit two prints of the most recent Assessor Map Book page or pages covering the
proposed division of land.
J. Affidavit - Submit one copy of an affidavit certif
yingunder penalty of
PejurY Pursuant to Section 2015.5
of the Code of Civil Procedure that all existing easements of record are shown on the tentative map.
K. Oak Tree Statement: Under Section 22.56.2050 (Oak Tree Permits), a person shall not cut, destroy,
remove; relocate, inflict damage, or encroach into the protected zone (5' from the drip line) of any tree
of the oak tree genus without first obtaining a permit. Damage includes but is not limited to: burning,
application of toxic substances, pruning or cutting, trenching, excavating,
or changing Pang. operation of machinery
or
equipment,ging of'the natural grade. See Oak Tree Application for requirements.
L. United States Geological Services Quad Sheet with project site plotted on the map.
M. Photos of subject property and key diagram.
N. 2 copies of a Title Report that is less than 30 days old.
THE MATERIALS HEREWITH BEING SUBMITTED DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE FILING OR AN
ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY.Within 30 days from the date noted on the fee receipt, the applicant or his agent
will be mailed a statement notifying him if additional materials or information are needed.
It should also be noted that additional environmental material/ data may required before project
begin and a public hearing meeting scheduled The results of the staffs environmental` rev ew, t al S s y) can
be sent to you as soon as possible. AT THE TIME THE INITIAL STUDY IS COMPLETED, yp ual Study) will
BE INFORMED OF ANY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEES REQUIRED. WILL ALSO
Study sbould be directed to the Diamond Bar Planning Division.
Q Questions regarding the initial
Additional information may be requested by the Planning Division in order
application. to enmplete the processing of this
B. ENVIRONM£NTAL INFORMATIO-
Staff Use
Project No.
INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Applicant (Owner): Project Representative:
DIAMOND BAR -EAST PARTNERS HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
C & A DEVELOPERS (Owner) ATTN: Paul DePalatis
NAME NAME
3480 TORRANCE BLVD, #300 2900 ADAMS STREET, #A-15
ADDRESS ADDRESS
TORRANCE, CA 90503 RIVERSIDE CA 92504•
(310) 540-3990 (909) 352-7200
PHONE # PHONE #
r. Action requested and project description: APPROVAL OF :TENTATIVE PARCf L MAP
SUBDIVIDING TWO LOTS INTO THREE LOTS
2. Street location of project: OAK KNOLL DRIVE
3a. Present use of site: VACANT; GRADED FOR SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
3b. Previous use of site or structures:
NONE
4. Please list all previous cases (if any) relatedto this project:
TENTATIVE TRACT 48487
5. Other related permit/approvals required.
Specify type and granting agency. _
NONE
6- Are you planning future phases 'of this project? Y O
If yesexplain:
7• Project Area:
Covered by structures, paving:
Landscaping:
Open space:
Total Area:
qK
TENTATIVE'biAP.SHALL SHOW THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
1. Tract or parcel map number in lower right hand corner.
2. Date, north point, scale and name of all owners.
3. Boundaries
a• Approximate bearings and distances.
b. Use heavy dashed lines to define.
C. Label with references; to adjoining recorded maps or deed lines.
4. Legal description of the land - sufficient to define boundaries.
5. Lots. -,number each lot and show approximate dimensions.
6. Contours (approximate) within and adjacent to subdivision.
7. - Streets
a• Existing within and adjoining the subdivision - show name, location, width, status, and
existing and proposed improvements.
b. Proposed - identify by name or letter. Show location, width, status and improvements.
C. Curve radius.
d. Rate of grade, drainage direction, and water distribution.
8. Easements - Location, width and status within the adjoining subdivision.
9. Existing Structures
a• Show approximate location of those not to be removed.
b• Show if within 50 feet of subdivision on adjoining land.
10: Grading Plan can be preliminary, if grading indicated on Owner's Statement.
11. Zoning - present and proposed, Delineate zone boundaries.
12. Storm Water - Approximate limits of any area subject to storm water overflow or inundation and
the Iocation, width, and direction of flow of each water course and/or swale.
13. Wells - existing or proposed.
14. Apartment Projects, Condominium or Lease.
a• Show structures with number of units therein building setbacks and required distances
between building. '
b. Access - vehicular and pedestrian. Show on ma
C. 'arking -'Show or note on ma S P, specify widths.
p. pecify number and type (covered or uncovered).
d• Recreation and service area. '
e• If more than one ]6t, specify the net area, the number of dwelling units, and the number '
cfparking spaces for each lot. .
f. If a condo conversion, note on the map the project address and the number of each type
Of unit (I' Br, 2 Br, etc.) and comply with the Condominium Conversion Ordinance
requirements for tenant notification Of relocation fees and waving casts allocations.
Submit a letter, indicating that the tenants have been notified prior to submittal of the
tentative
map.
P Also, submit schedule of rents.
9- Submit Ietter that tenants have been notified of the provision of Sec. 66452.9 of the
Subdivision Map Act and a copy of the notification to the tenants as it is
worded in the Map Act. specifically
15. Sewage Disposal - Location of any existing sewage disposal system which is proposed to remain
in the division of land.
F. Geological Report- Submit preliminary geological and/or soils reports to City Engineer at time of tentative
map submittal.
It RUCTIONS FOR SUBDIVISION APPL '.TION
y/ A. APPLICATION: Complete and submit one (1) copy of the Subdivision application. If a Subdivision map
is submitted with any number of other requests, submit the appropriate materials that accompany each
request.
Appointment to file: In order to. file a 'Subdivision Application' please call and make an appointment:
Making an appointment will assure that someone is available to review the case material for completeness
and accuracy. Planning Division, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, (909),396
5676.
1. The Subdivisions Application form MUST either be signed by the owner(s) of the subject property
or the application must presenta statement signed by the property owner(s) giving- him the right
to file the case. Purchaser in Escrow is not acceptable.
2. Zone may be identified on the House Numbering Map.
3. HNM—House Numbering Map.
5.` Use applied for - Describe the proposed project in detail—the nature of the business, occupation
or purpose for which the structure or improvement or premises are to be used and what is to be
done on or with the property in the way of additional improvements.
6 Tract or parcel map number shall be -obtained from Department of Public Works, 900 South
Freemont Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801, (818) 458-4930. Write the map :number on all items
submitted.
7." Domestic Water Source and Method of Sewage Disposal should specify
.type:of source, name of
service agency and district.
B. Legal Description: A separate complete legal description MUST be typed on or attached to EACH form
requiring; a legal description.
j C. Land Use Vicinity Maps: Maps are to be the scale of one (1) inch to 100 feet, (except for very large. areas
1 requiring a map of more than 9;square feet) showing all: surrounding uses, streets, highways, alleys, rights -
of --ways and lot cuts. This map' shall include applicant's property with dimensions and all surrounding
property within a radius of 700 feet from the exterior boundaries. 'Outliae subject property on all copies
of the map. A margin should be left around the edges of the map after drawing the 700 foot radius.
D. Initial Study:' The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a review of your proposed
project for possible environmental impacts. This Initial Study process is intended to a Germine the type
of environmental documentation necessary to have your project considered by the City. rhe Initial Study
consists of a completed ;questionnaire and other material which you must. provide arA an analysis of
potential impacts prepared by staff -often with the input from reviewing agencies with pecial expertise.
This process can beexpedited with your cooperation. See instructions for completing Initial Study
Questionnaire.
1. Environmental Information Form for Residential Projects - complete along with the Initial Study.
This information will be reviewed to preparethe Environmental Determination. The rear portion
of this form is for staff use only`.
E. Tentative Maps: shall be on one sheet and shall be on white back -ground prints. Engineers: scale shall be
1" = 100', or that will adequately show the proposed development. The overall dimensions of the map
should not exceed 36" x 42", as oversize maps may not be accepted. Maps shall be folded no larger than
8" x 14" with map number showing on front.
Lj
w
24. Describe the surrounding properties (synopsis). This narrative shall include a description of the soil'
stability, slopes,' drainage, scenic Quality, plants, and awmais: Which may exist. Indicate the type of land use
(resideatial, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use (single-family, multi-family,density,
professional, etc.), and scale of development ty, commercial,
p '(height, frontage, set -back, etc-) is the adjacent surrounding area.
SURROUNDING PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, EAST &,WEST IS DEVELOPED OR
DEVELOPING WITH CUSTOM SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENCES. THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT IS SIMILAR TO THE PROJECT AND IS DEPICTED ON THE
TENTATIVE MAP. PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH CONSISTS OF AN OPEN SPACE
LOT WITH A MANUFACTURED SLOPE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required. for initial environmental evaluation of the proposed project. ,All info ion is to the best of my
knowledge, belief and ability to determine factual, true, correct and eom
Date:. '%f, Signatures �-
Fo
Completion of this form is required to begin review of a project. Information within this form and the required
attached materials will assist the Ciry in determining whether a Negative Declaration maybe granted, whether a
Mitigated Negative Declaration may be granted, or whether Environmental Impact Report shall be required
I
Revised 1195 Subdivision
SUBDIVISION - CHECK -LIST,