The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/21/2000South Coast Air Quality Management District Main Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mayor Debby O'Connor Mayor Pro Tem Eileen Ansari Council Member 'WenChang Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Huff Interim City Manager James 17eStefano City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Lynda Burgess Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title H of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person: in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in.order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk'a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting, Have •nline access? City Council Agendasnow on City of • • -• site at vvww.CityofDiamondBar.com Please refrain from smoking eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of .Diamond Bar uses recycled paperrmd encourages you to do the same. w- Next Resolution No. 2000 - 56 Next Ordinance No. 07 (2000) 1. CLOSED SESSION: None 2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m., November 21, 2000 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor INVOCATION: Sr. Pastor Paul Lehman-Schletewitz, Walnut Valley Brethren ° in Christ Church ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem Ansari, Mayor O'Connor APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor 3A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS 3.A.1 Proclaiming December 1, 2000 as "World AIDS Day. 3.A.2 Introduction of Rita Torres, Sr. Account Clerk. 3.A.3 Presentation by El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon regarding Regional' - Airports. 3.A.4 Presentation by Mike Nelson, Communications and Marketing Director regarding "Info -to -Go." 3B. CITY MANAGERREPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 4. 4.a PUBLIC COMMENTS "Public Comments is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please - ------- -- - - ...+.,. ...r...,.a vv„, ,vuvi i. vi;u ua: t"IIF1 10. . voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit` when addressing the City Council. 4.b RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments' but no extended discussion NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 2 and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 COMMUNITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE -`November 20, 2000 — 7:00 p.m., AQMD, CC -2, 21660 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY — City Offices will be closed on Thursday, November 23 and Friday, November 24, 2000 for the Thanksgiving Holiday. City Offices will reopen on Monday, November 27, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. 5.3 HOLIDAY DIAMOND RIDE — November 24 — January 2, 2001 - Free door to door taxicab service to and from any commercial/retail center in the City to all residents (must be at least 18 years old, or accompanied by an adult). 5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION - November 28, 2000 7`.00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2000 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of November 7, 2000 Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of October 10, 2000 - Receive and File. Requested by: Planning Department 6.3 VOUCHER REGISTER — Approve Voucher Register dated November 21, 2000 in the amount of $986,573.44.' Requested by: Finance`'` Division 6.4 DENIAL OF CLAIM: 6.4.1 Filed by Mike Stickney, November 2, 2000. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the Claim for Damages and refer the matter to the Claims Manager for further action. 6.4.2 Filed by State Farm Insurance, November 2, 2000. NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 3 Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the Claim for Damages and refer the matter to the Claims Manager for further action. Requested by: City Clerk 6.5 EXONERATION OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT BONDS FOR LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION, GRADING, DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM, SEWER, STORM DRAINS & STREETS, AND MONUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 48487 -1n accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City entered into agreement dated October 20, 1995, with subdivider, Windmill Development/C&A Developers, to completevarious improvements for Tract 48487. The subdivider guaranteed faithful performance of this agreement by posting various surety bonds with the City. The subdivider later amended the Tract 48487 improvement plans and -consolidated them with Tract 50314 with the intent to simultaneously install all improvements for both subdivisions, which then' resulted in the posting of new consolidated bonds. The new consolidated bond amounts are now posted under Tract, 50314 in which the City entered into agreement dated April 18; 2000. The subdivider now requests exoneration of the original` bonds for Tract 48487. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve exoneration of Subdivision Improvement Bonds for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading, Domestic Water System, Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation Improvements for Tract 48487: Requested by: Public Works Division 6.6 (a) AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF PLAY EQUIPMENT AT LONGVIEW NORTH MINI PARK — Wooden play equipment that is located at Longview North Mini -Park has deteriorated since its installation over 10 years ago and is now in need of replacement as a matter of routine maintenance. Staff released an RFP to obtain a qualified contractor to remove the existing play equipment and install a replacement play set. Two firms responded to the RFP. The lowest responsive proposal was submitted by Creative Contractors in the amount of $53,312.43. This work is included in the 2000/01 FY Budget for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Dist. 39 (LLMD #39) in the amount of $50,000. In order to complete this work and provide for required inspections, it will require $63,300, including contingencies. Residents living in LLMD #39 pay into a fund, to provide maintenance for district facilities, such as replacement of this play, equipment. LLMD #39 is located on the eastern 'side of the City, in general location of Grand Ave. and Summit Ridge Dr:/Longview Dr. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for installation of play ground equipment at Longview Mini -Park to NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 4 Creative Contractors in the amount of $53,312.43, plus a 10% contingency of $5,330 for a total authorization of $58,642.43. It is further recommended that the City Council appropriate an additional $13,300 from LLMD #39 reserves to this project, for a total authorization of $63,300 in the 2000/01 FY Budget. (b) AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PLAY EQUIPMENT AT LONGVIEW NORTH MINI PARK — If the City Council awards a contract for installation of the play equipment at Longview North Mini -Park, it will be necessary to secure the services of an inspector. D & J Engineering is currently under contract with the City as the provider of these services. D & J Engineering has been the inspector for several successful play equipment installation projects in the City, including Maple Hill Park, Peterson Park, Ronald Reagan Park and Heritage Park. Recommended Action: It is recommended that,the City Council award a contract forinspectionservices for installation services of the play equipment at Longview North Mini -Park to D & J Engineering the amount of $4,225, . gineering in plus a contingency amount of $425 (10%), for a total authorization of $4,650 and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the purchase order for said amount. Requested by: Community Services Division 6.7 AWARD OF CONTRACT TO DMG-MAXIMUS, INC. TO PROVIDE EXECUTIVE RECRUITMENT SERVICES FOR THE POSITION OF CITY MANAGER - approval of a Professional Services Agreement with DMG- Maximus, Inc. to provide professional executive search services necessary to assist the City in its efforts to recruit and screen candidates for the position of City Manager. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City'Council approve an agreement between the City and DMG-Maximus, Inc. in the amount of $23,500, authorize a contingency amount of $1,50,0 and allocate the necessary resources ($25,000) from General Fund reserves. Requested by: City Manager 6.8 APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE NEW CITY HALL FACILITY AT THE AQMD CAMPUS - On September 5, Council authorized staff to enter into agreements with SPACES an ' d TOTAL PLAN for design services related to the proposed relocation of the City Hall facility from 21660 E. Copley Dr. to the AQMD campus. Since that time, City staff and the design team, including representatives of both SPACES and TOTAL PLAN, have been developing a space and office design plan that will adequately serve the needs of the community, City Council and City staff. NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 5 Recommended Action It is recommended that the City Council approve the conceptual plan for City Hall offices at the AQMD campus and authorize staff to develop final detailed construction documents and direct the City Clerk to advertise for the acceptance of bids. Requested by: City Manager 6.9 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE BREA CANYON ROAD (BETWEEN PATHFINDER ROAD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT On June 6, 2000, Council awarded a contract in the amount of $672,000.00 with a contingency of $67,000 for a total authorization amount of $739,000 to rehabilitate Brea Canyon Rd. from Pathfinder Rd. to Golden Spgs. Dr. Construction commenced on July 17, 2000, and was completed on August 31, 2000, ahead of the original anticipated completion date of October 17, 2000. Staff determined that all work, including punch list items, are complete and in accordance with specifications prepared and approved by the City. The final construction contract amount is $801,516.75. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council (1) authorize the Interim City Manager to approve a contract amendment with Sully -Miller Contracting Co: in an amount,not-to-exceed $62,516.75 and (2) accept the work performed by Sully -Miller Contracting Co. and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion and release any retention amounts thirty-five days after the recordation date. Requested by: Public Works Division 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. None 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 CONSIDERATION FOR PROPOSED 4Th OF JULY CONCERT AND FIREWORKS SHOW The 4ty of July is on a Wednesday in 2001. Summer Concerts in the Park have been conducted on Wednesday evenings for the past 10 years. The concert before Independence Day has always been billed as the "Patriotic" concert. Because of these circumstances,staff has developed three options for the "Patriotic concert for the summer of 2001. Option I is for an evening concert on July 4th from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., followed with a fireworks show. Cost for Option I is about $20,000: Option II is for an afternoon concert on July 4th from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., with no fireworks show. Cost for Option 11 is about $10,000. Option III is to have the Patriotic Concert on June 27th instead of July 4, with no fireworks show. Cost for Option Ill is about $2,0000; the regular cost for a single summer concert. Option I I I also saves about $2,000 in the FY 2001-02 budget because there would be only nine concerts instead of the usual, ten. This item was . a NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 6 continued from the October 17, 2000 City Council Meeting. At that meeting, Council directed staff to obtain additional information related to this event, which is proposed for Sycamore Canyon Park. RecommendedAction: It is recommended that the City Council review the options presented for the July 4, 2001 Summer Concert date and direct staff as deemed appropriate: Requested by: Community Services Division 8.2 APPOINTMENT OF TWO COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO SERVE AS ALTERNATES TO THE LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE At its meeting of November 7, 2000, Council appointed D.B. community members Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell along with Council Member Carol Herrera to serve on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee. At that time, Council also appointed Council Member Bob Huff to serve as the alternate City Council representative to the Committee. Also at that meeting, Council directed that the City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee members should nominate two alternates for each of the at -large, community representative seats. The City's advisory committee will meet on November 20th to nominating two community members to serve on the Committee. The names of the nominees will be presented to Council at this meeting, Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council appoint two community members to serve as alternates to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee: Requested by: City Manager 9. NEW BUSINESS: None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Next Resolution No. RA 2000-02 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman' ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Chang, C/Huff 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act; the NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 7 Aaencv aeneraliv cannot takeanyaction on items not listed on the posted agenda. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 7, 2000 Approve as submitted: Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER— Approve Voucher Register dated .November 21, 2000 in the amount of $1,083,808.21. Requested by: 'Finance Division 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 1. CLOSED SESSION: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR "QUICK CAP" MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 None 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor O'Connor called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Huff. INVOCATION: Sr. Pastor Paul Lehman-Schletewitz, Walnut Valley Brethren in Christ Church gave the Invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem Ansari, Mayor O'Connor Also present were: James DeStefano; Interim City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: No changes. 3A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.A.1 Proclaimed December 1, 2000 as "World AIDS Day." 3.A.2 Introduced Rita Torres, Sr. Account Clerk. 3.A.3 Presentation by El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon regarding Regional Airports. 3.A.4 Presentation by Mike Nelson; Communications and Marketing Director regarding "Info -to -Go. 3B. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ICM/DeStefano announced that a new grocer, "Market World," has established a lease for the former Albertson's store on Golden Springs at Brea Canyon Rd. and is currently beginning work on tenant improvements. ICM/DeStefano gave an update on the status of the study conductedby SCAG for exclusive truck lanes on the 60 freeway. 4. 4.a PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mrs. Luber, Castlerock Elementary School, presented several students from her former third grade class who participated in a study about the City last year. The students presented a paper, quilt for display at NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 2 City Hall. Martha Bruske - continues to be concerned about slope maintenance and that the matter be agendized on a future agenda for discussion and attention. Lydia Plunk — expressed concern about the fact that one Council Member has fallen behind in filing campaign statements. Suggested that the City Council adopt a policy that the individual who is behind: in filing be restricted from serving o committees or other activities, which may interfere with completion of the filing. Darla Farrell — appreciated information received tonight regarding regional airports and the truck lane study. Sue Sisk - Thanked C/Herrera and C/Huff for their assistance on the Lanterman matter. Suggested agendizing the study on the 60 freeway truck lanes. 4.b RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY City Offices will be closed on Thursday, - November 23 and Friday, November 24„ 2000 for the Thanksgiving Holiday. City Offices will reopen on Monday, November 27, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. 5.2 HOLIDAY DIAMOND RIDE — November 24 — January 2, 2001 — Free door to door taxicab service to and from any commercial/retail center in the City to all residents (must be at least 18 years old, or accompanied by an adult). 5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION November 28, 2000 7;00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4 LANTERMAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE December 4, 2000 — 7:00 p.m., Research Meeting Room, 3530 W. Pomona Blvd., Pomona 5.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - December 5, 2000 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved by C/Chang, seconded by MPT/Ansari to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Items No 6.8 and 6.9. Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote: 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES" — Regular Meeting of November 7, 2000 — As submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 10, 2000. NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 3 6.3 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER — dated November 21, 2000 in the amount of $986,573.44. (M/O'Connor recused herself from approval of a payment in the amount of $363.23 related to the Lanterman Forensic Expansion Project.) 6.4 DENIED CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES: 6.4.1 Filed by Mike Stickney, November 2, 2000 and referred the matter to the Claims Manager for further action. 6.4.2 Filed by State Farm Insurance, November 2, 2000 and referred the matter to the Claims Manager for further action. 6.5 EXONERATED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT BONDS FOR LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION, GRADING, DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM, SEWER, STORM DRAINS & STREETS, AND MONUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS' FOR TRACT 48487- for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading, Domestic Water System, Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation'Improvements for Tract 48487. 6.7 AWARDED CONTRACT TO DMG-MAXIMUS, INC. TO PROVIDE EXECUTIVE RECRUITMENT SERVICES FOR THE POSITION OF CITY MANAGER — and approved an agreement with DMG-Maximus, Inc. in the amount of $23,500, authorized a contingency amount of $1,500 and allocated the necessary' resources ($25,000) from General Fund reserves. 6.9 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE BREA CANYON ROAD (BETWEEN PATHFINDER ROAD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT (1) authorized the Interim City Manager to approve a contract amendment with Sully -Miller Contracting Co. in an amount not -to -exceed $62,516.75 and (2) accepted the work performed by Sully -Miller Contracting g Co. and authorized the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion and release any retention amounts thirty-five days after the recordation date. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.6 (a) AWARDED CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF PLAY EQUIPMENT AT LONGVIEW NORTH MINI PARK — to Creative Contractors in the amount of $53,312.43, plus a 10% contingency of $5,330 for a total authorization of $58,642.43. It is further recommended that the City Council appropriate an additional $13,300 from LLMD #39 reserves to this project, for a total authorization of $63,300 in the 2000/01 FY Budget. (b) AWARDED CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PLAY EQUIPMENT AT LONGVIEW NORTH MINI - PARK — to D & J Engineering in the amount of $4,225, plus a contingency NOVEMBER 21 2000 PAGE 4 amount of $425 (10%), for a totalauthorization of $4,650 and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the purchase order for said amount. Moved by C/Ansari, seconded by C/Huff to approve 6.6(a) and 6.6(b). Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote: 6.8 APPROVED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE NEW CITY HALL FACILITY AT THE AQMD CAMPUS — and authorized staff to develop final detailed construction documents and directed the City Clerk to advertise for the acceptance of bids. Moved by MPT/Ansari, seconded by C/Huff to approve. Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote: 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. None 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 4T" OF JULY CONCERT AND FIREWORKS SHOW The 4th of July is on a Wednesday in 2001 Summer Concerts in the Park have been conducted on Wednesday evenings for the past 10 years. The concert before Independence Day has always been billed as the "Patriotic" concert. Because of these- circumstances, staff has developed three options for the "Patriotic concert for the summer' of 2001. Option I is for an evening concert on July 4th from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., followed with a fireworks show. Cost for Option I is about $20,000. Option II is for an afternoon concert on July 4th from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., with no fireworks show. Cost for Option II is about $10,000. Option III is to'have the Patriotic Concert on June 27th instead of July 4, with no fireworks show. Cost for Option III is about $2,0000, the regular cost for a single summer concert. Option III also saves about $2,000 in the FY 2001-02 budget becausethere would be only nine concerts instead of the usual ten. This item was continued from the October 17 2000 City Council Meeting. At that .meeting, Council directed staff to obtain additional information related to this event, which is proposed' for Sycamore Canyon Park. Inspector Joe Alvarado, L.A. County Fire, stated that he has inspected the area where the proposed fireworks show will be held. He felt that the area would be suitable for this purpose. A Fire Safety Officer can be provided during the event at the City's request. Moved by C/Chang, seconded by C/Herrera to approve Option 1. Motion carried 4-1-0 by the following Roll Call vote (C/Huff voted no): M/O'Connor recused herself from discussion of the following item due to a potential conflict of interest: NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 5 8.2 APPOINTMENT F TWO COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO SERVE AS ALTERNATES TO THE LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY AD ISORY COMMITTEE— At its meeting of November 7, 2000, Council app inted D.B. community members Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell along with ouncil Member Carol Herrera to serve on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee. At that time, Council also appointed Council Member Bob Huff to serve as the alternate City Council representative to the Committee. Also at that meeting, Council directed that the City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee members should nominate two alternates for each of the at -large, community representative seats. The City's advisory committee will meet on November 20th to nominating two communitymembers to serve on the Committee. The nmes of the nominees will be presented to Council at this meeting. Moved by C/Herre Figueroa as altern Advisory Committ (M/O'Connor abst 9. NEW BUSINESS: RECESS TO REDEVELOPME 1. CALL TO ORDER: at 8:35 p.m. in the Auditor 21865 E. Copley Dr., Dia ROLL CALL: O'Connor, VC/Chang, C/N Also present were: Jame Agency Attorney; David D Works; Bob Rose,'Commu Mike Nelson, Communica Secretary. r , seconded by C/Huff to appoint Ruth Purpuro and Lydia ales to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community e . Motion 'carried 4-0-1 by the following Roll Call vote ned). None AGENCY 8:34 p.m. Chairman Huff called the meeting to order i m of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Bar, CA. Iff Agency Members Ansari, Herrera, Jame a N s DeStefano; Interim Executive Director; Mike Jenkins, yle, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of Public ity Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director;- tons irector;tons & Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/Ansari to approve the Roll Call vote: 3.1 APPROVED MINU- submitted. 3.2 APPROVED VOUCI None offered. Moved by AM/Chang, seconded by )nsent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0 by the following ES — Regular Meeting of . November 7, 2000 - As REGISTER dated November 21, 2000 in the NOVEMBER 21,'2000 PAGE 6 amount of $1,083,808.21. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7.. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: AM/Ansari spoke about a recent Redevelopment Agency Abuse Conference attended by a member of City staff. ADJOURN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: 8:39 pm. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 8:39 p.m. 10. COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS: C/Huff requested that the Regional Airport issue be brought back at a future Council meeting for consideration of a Resolution. 12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/O'Connor adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.. TO: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 14, 2000 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Award of Contract for Installation of Play Equipment at Longview North Mini -Park' SUMMARY: Wooden play equipment that is located at Longview North Mini -Park has deteriorated since its installation over 10 years ago and is now in need of replacement as a matter of routine maintenance. Staff released an R.F.P. to obtain a qualified contractor to remove theexistingplay equipment and to install a replacement play set. Proposals were received from two firms who responded to the R.F.P. The lowest responsive proposal was submitted by Creative Contractors in the amount of $53,312.43. This work is included in the 2000/01 F.Y. Budget for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District #39 (L.L.M.D. #39) in the amount of $50,000. Continued on Page 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It recommended that the City Council award a contract for the installation of play ground equipment at Longview North Mini -Park to Creative Contractors ip,the-amount of $53,312.43, plus a 10% contingency of $5,330 fora total authorization of $58,642.43. It��'u„n is further recommended that the City Council appropriate an additional $13,300 from L.L.M.D. #39 reserves to " this project, for a total authorization of $63,300 in the 2000101 F.Y. Budget LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) - Bid Specifications Ordinance(s) X Other: Request for Proposals (on file with City X Agreement Clerk's Office) Proposal Submittal Results EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? X Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3 Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No What Commission? NIA 5. Are other, departments affected by the report? Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REVIEWED James DeStef ` no ob se Interim City Ma, ager Community Services Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Installation of Play Equipment at Longview North Mini - Park Issue Statement Award of this `contract will result in the installation of new play equipment at Longview North Mini -Parka Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the installation of play ground equipment at Longview North Mini -Park to Creative Contractors in the amount of $53,312.43, plus a 10% contingency of $5,330 for a total authorization of $58,642.43. It is further recommended that the City Council appropriate an additional $13,300 from L.L.M.D. #39 reserves to this project, for a total authorization of $63,300 in the 2000/01 F.Y. Budget: Financial Summary The City Council has allocated $50,000 in the 2000/01 Fiscal Year Budget for the completion of this work. Total cost to complete this work, per the following detail, will be $63,300. Play Equipment Installation Contract: $53,312.43 10% Installation Contingency: $ 5,330.00 Inspection: 4,650.00 TOTAL: $63,292.43 The reserve fund balance in L.L.M.D. #39 for the 2000/01 F.Y. Budget is $157,431. Background Wooden play equipment was originally installed at Longview North Mini -Park by the developer of the homes in the area over l0 years ago. The wood has deteriorated to the point that the play equipment now must be removed because of safety concerns. It is staff's intent to replace the play equipment with a new play set, Utilizing funds from L.L.M.D. #39 to pay the costs. Staff released an R.F.P. to seek a qualified contractor to complete the demolition work, of the existing play equipment and to install a new play set. Proposals were submitted by two qualified firms in response to the R.F.P. with thelowercost proposal being submitted by Creative Contractors, in the amount of $53,312.43. The contractor's license has been checked with California Consumer Affairs and the license is active and clear. References have been checked and Creative Contractors is highly recommended for this type of work by other agencies. They are also a certified installer of the type of play equipment that will be placed in the park. Discussion Longview North Mini -Park is located in L.L.M.D. #39, on Longview Drive north of Grand Avenue. The park is less than an acre in size and includes turf, trees and the tot lot. It is classified as a neighborhood park and it is intended to serve residents within about a 1/z mile radius of the park. The residents in this neighborhood pay into a fund to provide for maintenance of the park and other landscaping amenities in the neighborhood. It is appropriate to utilize funds from L.L.M.D. #39 to complete the work necessary to replace the play equipment at this park. The total cost to complete this work should not exceed $63,300. This includes construction, inspection, and contingencies for unexpected conditions. The work will start within six weeks after execution of the contract and take 60 days to complete. Prepared by: Bob Rose Community Services Director I $1,000,000 each accident. 4) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. 5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1;000,000 each accident. 6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall.: 1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted to do -business in the State of California. 2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, its officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; 3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon to cover a loss under the policy; 4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: „ "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days, after receipt by City of a written notice of such 1 cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidencedby receipt of,a registered letter." 5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to the City. d The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: 1) Waives.all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c. (2) hereof to be listed as additional insured in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; 2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' - 'written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. City of Diamond Bar Page 3 Agreement e. The CONTRACTOR shall, within ten (1 0) days from the date of the notice of award of the Contract, deliver to the City Manager or his designee the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. -hereof, or deliver to the City Manager or his designee a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance 'of such insurance, and the additional insured and other provisions required herein. " 5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the CONTRACTOR is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar, character in the locality in which' the 'public works is performed, and not less than the generalprevailing rate of ,per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, ,the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required' to :and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as penalty to City, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion` thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated' for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR is required `to make contribution to funds established- for the administrative of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other CONTRACTORS on the public works site are making such contributions. The CONTRACTOR and subcontractor under him shall comply with the, requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and .other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor steal I constitute a legal day's work for al l workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the CONTRACTOR and City of Diamond Bar Page 4 Agreement I any sub -contractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.: The CONTRACTOR shah forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by hien or any sub- CONTRACTOR under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which the laborer, workman or mechanic is required or permitted to tabor more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Diamond Bar and its officers, agents and employees ("Indemnities") shall not 'be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed -In performing the work, or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen or employees of the CONTRACTOR, of his subcontractor's or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever. The CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnities against and will hold and save Indemnities harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to ,persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may beassertedor claimed' by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the CONTRACTOR, his agents,, employees, subcontractors or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City. In connection therewith: a. The CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any such claims, damages; penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the CONTRACTOR or Indemnities covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations or activities of the CONTRACTOR hereunder, and the CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnities harmless therefrom. C. In the event Indemnities are made a party to any action or proceeding filed or i City of Diamond Bar Page 5 Agreement l 11/10/2000 10:45 949-858-0113 CREATIVECONTRACTORS, PAGE 02 NON-09-00 11 s 17A P . Clft IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parfips hereto have executed this Agreement with all the formalities required by taw on the respective dates set fortis opposite their signatures. State of California "CONTRACTOR'S" License No. t3l'�4-a -TeA '�Z- 0Q-l- �4 100 By: Lia' j 00 TITLE CITY OF DIAMONd BAR; CALIFORNIA By: Date MAYOR ATTEST: By. Date CITY CLERK CONTRACTOR'S Business Phone: Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any time: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date 'Cityof Diamond Bar Page 7 Agreement , 2 k .` . | � 4ag LOCAL NEWS / WEATHER EDITORIALS SECT10U FR ME MONDAY MAY 17, 1999 CC 0 Put Airports Wherelhey're Most .Needed ■ Southland: The growth centers County can determine it John Wayne The communities of Southern Catifor will be in outlying areas, so that's Airport should continue in its current nia closest to LAX will grow the least; the role. El Toro is an essential part of any communities most remote from LAX will where expansion of facilities equitable system. It makes no sense for grow the most. For example, one of those should be. the communities around LAX to continue "Chicagos'- will be in the Inland Empire. to bear the burden of Orange County air San Bernardino and Riverside counties travel. together will double in size to nearly 7 By MIKE GORDON In the Inland Empire, Ontario Airport million people. A similar rate of growth is • should grow to be a hub airport with expected in north Los Angeles County. The debate about the wisdom of ea- cargo service. International service may , parts of the region once thought of as panding Los Angeles International Air be appropriate eventually. The former port—and the role of other regional air Norton Air Force base can become a primarily rural add sparsely populated soon will be de«dedly urban—aria will ports—is not about meeting the air short and medium haul satellite' ate their ownneeds for air commerce. commerce needs of today. Rather, this while March and George Air Force bases Happily, they already have their own air discussion is about meeting Southern asps to serve the region as, primarily port resources if we Choose to use them. California's needs 20 years from now and cargo airports. because of their beyond_ Such a system can capture all the Furthermore, cheap The airport . system that makes sense growth in air commerce -passenger and land, the high-growth communities in the Inland Empire and north Los es over the nest 20 years dnea not require. an cargo—anticipated in Southern California �8� expanded LAX, but rather appropriate without requiring a expansion of LAX. County have become bedroom communi- utilization of airports in each of the three These airports exist now and require few" ties to the rest of Southern California. Ev- emerging economic centers of Southern runway additions. As a result, this system ery morningand evening, hundreds of can meet the thousands of commuters fill the freeways California: Los Angeles County, Orange region's needs at a fraction ys of the cost projected for expanding LAX. heading to and from jobs in, Orange and County and the Inland Empire. Each of Los Angeles counties. Utilizing these areas has a natural candidate to lm�►t, this system recognizesexisting Most important, airports in these high growth areas and serve as its hub airport and one or more and responds to the changing growth pat' helping industry to locate near theme will candidate satellite airports. terns in Southern California. It simply makes sense to use existing airport re- provide local jobs for loeg residents in In:to Los Angeles County, Los Angeles sources in the heart of the new growth these areas. Interriational Airport, obviously. Conti- l�cen� of enormous sums requiring mthe ex- Building our airport resoum m _in the nues to i`be the hub and the regions maor on to heart of these new growth centem, rather international, airport. Burbank and Long expand an airport that will be me as- than at LAS, is not only the least costly Beach airports should continue as sate ingly remote from the markets of the and most sensible alternative available, It lite airports with short and medium haul Southern Californmof the future. is also an important part of our regional service appropriate to their communities, planners at the Southern California efforts to avoid unnecessary congestion simil r p airport can develop to serve a Assn of Governments like to say that we and improve future air quality. similar satellite role. will add two cities the size of Chicago" Gridlock serves no one. In Orange County, the Proposed El to our Population over the next 20 Years. Toro airport should become a hub airport Hov tearer, this population will be distnb- ,)like Gordon is the mayor of El Segun- vith international cervice as well. Orange uteri quite differently than now. do. LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIALS-___ a - r w 0 H U r KATHRYN M. DOWNING, Publisher MICHAEL PARKS, Editor C JANET CLAYTON, Editor of the Editorial Pages LAX Can't Do It Alone 0 ne of Southern California's most im- a year at LAX, adding to traffic and conges- portant transportation decisions ever tion problems. will probably be made in late 2000 or Southern California's airport problem is early 2001. It's whether Los AngelesInter- one with national echoes. More Americans national Airport will get new infrastructure are. flying, but few want new or busier air - to meet soaring demand for passenger and ports. Just three major airports have been cargo service. LAX needs to grow, but it built in the United 'States since 1970, a pe - cannot bear the whole burden. riod in which passenger trips tripled, The -Six-runway, five -runway and reconfig- East Coast was better prepared to absorb .-ured four -runway plans have been drafted the growth, with 35 airports, including ma - for LAX, to allow 92 million to 98 million jor facilities in Boston, New York, New Jer- passenger trips a year by 2015, a major in- sey, Pennsylvania, Maryland; - Virginia, crease over today's 61 mil- Georgia and Florida. lion trips. A fourth option is no expansion. ` Crowded L By 2015, regional de- Ninon a Passeoger vio rnand for air passenger kikmaiunalArpot `service is expected to. hit i�ss..; ,.• ...:;a7 157 million passenger trips. lean .r Even with expansion, LAX would see its share of re- lass gional passenger traffic re- duced from 75% to 60% of all passengers. e� w ns 5 Right now, only Ies°V&WAjr `" Palmdale and Ontario would welcome airport ex- pansion, and both have problems. Palmdale Regional Airport is separated from the L.A. Basin by mountains, many miles and heavily burdened freeway choke points. At Ontario International, air quality issues re- strict growth. Los Angeles World Airports, which oper- ates LAX and the Ontario and Palmdale air- ports, is hoping for just a I % increase in Burbank passenger traffic. Long Beach Air- 'port, ir-`"'port, with severely capped operations, isn't ,.,,even mentioned. In Orange County, a new El Toro Interna- "lional Airport is being planned but is op- -posed by 75% of neighbors, according to poll§. John Wayne Airport currently has a cap of 8.4 million passenger trips, Orange County residents account for 12 million trios On the ; West Coast, the K vast majority of passengers mauykiLmAngeles and cargo is funneled through • LAX. and San Francisco- . International, two bottlenecks with less available land than other si major airports. LAX en- compasses Tess than 5.5 ' °QZ square .. miles, and San est of Proposed Francisco even less. Com- D"—Wnh kW to pare that, with Orlando, Los nr geft Times Fla., at 23` square miles. Aviation's impact on jobs and revenues also must be considered. LAX alone generates 393,000 jobs and $61 billion annually. Southern California communities that are unwilling or unable to join in a true regional growth plan will see new jobs and revenues go to San Francisco International, which is expanding capacity, Denver, Phoe- nix and elsewhere. Environmental reports on the LAX op- tions are expected by mid -2000. At least a dozen state, federal and local agencies or panels will review or pass judgment on the plans, including the Los Angeles City Coun- cil. During that process, other airports such as those in Orange County, Burbank, Long Beach; Riverside and San Bernardino will have to step up and bear some of the burden that LAX has shouldered for so long. FRIDAY, O- - 6,2000 IT R IAL L ETTER 1 OUR OPINION The LAX alternative OST of the communities. It would reports that Expandingthe also keep the LAX area come out of region's smaller — especially the West - the Southern California airports makes side corridor of the San Agency of Govern- Diego Freeway from menta end up collecting sense both getting even more con - dust on some ware- economically gested, clogging up traf-- house shelf and fic routes to and from But this time, SCAG environmentally the Valley and pollut- - a regional planning mg the air with exhaust agency that has never�, fumes and noise. quite lived up to its � l The result would be Potential because it lacks authority cleaner air, quieter neighborhoods, — has produced some literature a stronger regional economy, an eas- worth reading, ler commute and safer skies that are SCAG's report on airport ,devel not choked with too many air- opment is one to take seriously. Its planes. It's a very reasonable policy findings are promising for the — which is why City Hall will prob- future of the Los Angeles area and ably bury the SCAG report instead the people who live here. of taking it seriously. The study suggests that the need City officials are against decen- to meet increased demand to move tralizing air services because they cargo and passengers can best be fear losing tax dollars that more achieved by improving services at passengers at LAX would generate other neighboring airports. That for them to squander. Moreover," includes going ahead with develop- they ;are in bed with union leaders ment on the proposed El Toro facil- who are working hard to control the itv in Orange County. work force at LAX so they can 'it sounds pretty straightforward drive up wages by holding air ser- - if LAX is overwhelmed, send the vices hostage. traffic elsewhere. But for once, quality of life and But the idea flies in the face of public safety should count more Mayor Richard Riordan's plan to than the politicians' insatiable appe- spend $12 billion beefing up LAX. tite for more revenue or the unions' Unlike the LAX proposal; the demands for more power. For once SCAG alternative would spread the taking care of the economy and the wealth — and the problems — environment should take preee- more equitably throughout the Bence over taking care of City region. Hall's special interests. Expanding services at other air- Before the city's politicians shelve arts would bring more passengers, the SCAG report, they should try` businesses and prosperity to those reading it. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL' © 20O7 Dmv Jocks CY Company, Im. All Rights Reserver!. . VOL. CCXXXX't NO. 66 ti E/RV * * * WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4. 2000 WSJ.com New Study Questions New Study Suggests Expansion Bigger LAS Of LAN May Not Be worth It By SHIRLEY IXUITG Continued k`rom Page CAI rently, LAX ferries about 64 million passen- staff Reporter: of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL- planning agency, commissioned thestudy gers annually, or nearly 75% of the.. re - Southern California's economy will get as part of devising a regional transportation gion'sair=passenger traffic. It creates a similar boost from an airport expansion, plan that it expects to issue next March. 408.000 jobs in a five -county region and whether it's at giant Los Angeles Interna The group is to recommend in the; plan bringsin about S60' billion in direct' eco- tional or a small, regional airport, a new which airports in the region should expand. nomic benefits, measured by wages and study says. Currently, the region's six major airports business generated, such as tourist spend - As a result, the. study recommends, fly about 85 million passengers annually. ing at hotels and restaurants. LAX staff is planners should focus on expanding air- Opponents of an expanded LAX say the recommending a $10 billion to S12 billion ports according to which projects would study confirms their arguments that a big- master plan that would reconfigure run - have the least impact on traffic and the ger LAX isn't critical to the health of the ways and add a terminal to expand air environment. "Air transportation is impor- regional economy. Rather, the region capacity to 89 million passengers annually tant, but so are a lot of other things," says should look to expand airports in other ar- in 2015,' Skip Hull, an economist and vice president eas, such as Orange County's El Toro site: `Airport of Choice' at San Diego -based CIC Research Inc., Ruth Galanter, a Los Angeles City which conducted the study for the South u Council member who opposes an expanded This has been an airport here for 70 ern California Association of Govern- LAX, says the study reaches "the same years, and for the past 50 years it has been meets. "Now let's do it well." the dominant airport," he says. "If we The $100.090 study. comes at a time " conclusion" ene she has reached. The "eco- grow in the next 20 years, to doubling the mte benefits to Southern California are demand, you can certainly expect LAX P tty much the same," Ms. G County are working on plans for-multibil- says. "no matter where in the region air- alanter will be a key point in that growth.... Air when officials in Los Angeles and Orange re lion dollar airport expansions, partly be port demand is met." lines have continued to prosper to the point that LAX is an airport of choice for cause bigger airports bring new jobs and Adds El Segundo. Mayor Mike Gordon, convenience." businesses. the leader of a coalition of nearly 80 cities Looking at passenger forecasts for d counties that opposes LAX expansion: Mr. Ritchie says LAX will release its g an 2020, the study concluded that there would that own economic -impact analysis in about is study fully supports .our arguments two months. be an additional annual economic activityt a regional plan is the best approach" of $11.2 billion—and the creation of 83,000 for the communities surrounding' LAX, But Carol Schatz, president of the Cen- jobs—if the most -aggressive LAX expan- and the best approach for other communi- tral Citv Association, which represents sion plan were implemented, as compared ties that want opportunities to develop air- downtown businesses in Los Angeles, says with no expansion. Economic activity in- ports. there is more at stake than simply eco- eludes direct and indirect benefits, such as nomic benefits. Rather, it's a matter of airline ticket sales, employee wages and Economic Engines meeting aviation demand. hotels. That regional plan factors to an The study, however, is drawing criti- "The principal reason that you need to expanded LAX that would' ferry 94 million cism from LAX officials and airport boost- modernize and expand is because of the passengers annually and a new airport at ers. "Airports -whether it's LAX or oth- growing market," says Ms. Schatz. "The the former El Toro Marine Corps Air Sta ers—are tremendous economic engines," airport simply isn't big enough to accom- tion that would carry 22.2 million passen says Jim Ritchie, deputy executive direr- modate all the passengers and air cargo." gers. for for long-range planning at Los Angeles World'Airports and the person spearhead- T� WALL STREET JOURNAL/CAMFORNIA In Context ing the LAX master plan. welcomes your comments via e-mail, fax, letter or phone. Contact Michael Totty, While the estimates Of 811.2 billion and Mr. Ritchie says LAX has played a big Editor, by e-mail at ivslcaCwsJ.eom, or by 83,000 jobs may seem large, the study role to the region's aviation and will. con- fax at 415-765-8294. Write to Mr. Totty at points out that by 2020, the six -county, re- tinue to do so in the future because it's 201 California St., Suite 1175, San'_ gional economy—which stretches from located in a dense population center. Cur- Francisco, Calif. 94111. Or call 415-765.8285. Ventura to Orange to San Bernardino coun- ties—also will be huge. The result: CIC's estimated increase in economic' activity will represent a tittle more than '0.59 of the region's $1.7 trillion' economy and its nearly 13.8 million jobs. TheSouthern California Association of Governments, the region's transportation Please Tum to Page CA4, Column 5 L� Ch rn , O CO C. rn rn p - ooy �"�°' -14 �_�m�a'3t° x"070mW� �� m.c a oW o o to c o o s:'"Q C7 a o c•� _ p °''5 ■� L=R�c sU v,C;�Eoc°7..��_=o ods=�� L� cEcr,L-,a `o>r., a - moo., Y�'� o[s '�v o c C'R�-4,oc�3oOts o«�y> AE E., ... O O —ca 'o U G yU r... C.1 'r L a C O. O O W=semR _ L pcG=Y >C 3 Wcc rjpo oRL =UE a) 9, cc C O t.R... O O N V1 L O '"C" C R C C = y . = to `CS.� _. 'p •^ �+ E ^ «. �- ... � •� O 61 w _ ..., ... �+ tn. R = �• �' 'c4.. 3 o OD cca E aci o �^ as Q eon^x c E s cF R ... L R- R 3 .+ L' p .'O O. D y. W w O M .= d - a 3 •�^L Rp= �`oo u o� �� x E> o E E Cn tDy �WU rrA .. d 2== O. 7 = u !!1 � .i =^ �,. S.. b O +�' O p t O ,„+ R: _. •O COD R m = .- p, O .fl cc S. +-' s0. - R . a N 0 ;x. 0 ria ^ n C �' va in = � 0 ...> c a O Q �p r:. R''a. C . m '� O= O O 3 OCL) a R �.. arm R O C O '" >'LM 0. = a) U'' apt+va ss rF ayE= UC:,' y�.v 0 c t.=>I�. _ y�WWEfl�ya>�W r-NDy�L'pa=�C.C_ _UCa> .L Ci o C a, R ■ c�siCVUc� vL�•�>110o`_s�cvEd�mEY+U-vc,�.5 oE��y ti E ..a�� =p a� U E EW s•o aF c U o sR•¢ y o a'oF" a=i R d c� a c ca'.,a o S. 0 R c ID tA .. T E s v =%Dcn o._. ..0 u R m.EAu E Rr C. u .00 E� - « q e ,Eaoy coio"'Arn - ocdo o=RU-ai�>cv`o R w CO cu S. 3 .... Q�,, U p �.,, E. O E p.•p R En c am•.... Dov >,Em .3 10 c.. O •p y CZ -0 Lfj LZ Q 0 R-�'o o ca 3 C N a g o cu �R0 ,cur- E W uri W N U a.0 DC o. W .c a) i O CD: L= •a. M. L LU !1 Z M .0 C O R �,,, R R ""i.4 y •p �p 7 L y m cu cO =.c c o a^ c<a cagy oW o V Z .� E v, +� �.N'R =NA Z C:� OU r�0. L r.L. s: CN y L.0 ESC. y E a, u C'C m Yo E afz cu EH L,E rn c w Eumom•a 3 a¢ ..f. m a) O = Cp •-moi C ?. i� R . R , 4: O %» L C 7 SN �;, IL N ,. `o do .= �� 5 ccc cx R'0-�'a E� i E va J D c C' Eiy c =U o �.00 OCw c 3 O a�'" o o m &... °= o c .,o r. «. a.a �ouo�" d wE - L O O O N C R O L U ca O y rYa CD a) O C O -. v, h a) O W> p a, .. u L , U� R. L40 L a, i.•VS` 00.1." o^_ •0 R -� ■ a R w - C cti . o m m0 o g � R p y p �� s. pL v E o Y o . O 'm = c=C R C lO aR, O cs l� Cts A a .0 r 'cC y ep aci �0-;:C L y cC ..0 fid].-, R-�^•O O L R R.O O00-0 'n C E ■ 0 y L �c4 arm O.�a)� OOH U-Q.p-.i.0 p C CL p.. t. •.O".. �>, •� �. o�aC9iTsycOv>�"yya�_m-.o"'=oee°s=cmRa�-t' 0E :c c L � c n a> s. o a r �L.'"' 3F W B °�� y� G o a`i= °•'� ai o o c� �`c-occcco"E caciRocmccw`°vV'a.Wai,v ID o 0z ciaG r= -0 .� C -a L. O Q U 0...."" C p �, O C C W O O- .0 = :'C R +.+ v, R +.' .... L '�, ..7 C s. O >c•Ecn->'= aRE�vE'�`4��aEio".��wYECz°,Dc��o.= L I E �Z 3= (D >C� 0to'E cc h W W-.= a+•.. O R U'r0 O..., r+ _ ... L p R O L= cn= O CD p f3,.0 ". L= >.'� w O G. E R O V OD -m �' U N r.. c aCU E.L 3. E C 3. R� p (D > m O mm ca v d.: _ >,¢ = .. - O cp rn O V d E .Q o i.. C '� Q pVj = ,C y'�:•a rn � .:� w C i� ";7 N C ■O v a�w>`�c� p .J RV .:s=°� cyQocc... S U v; ., ..0 ro.^ O OU...,va O aoiQ v''�¢ c0 0 ��,;c sR. c o C. cp o 0.0 cQ ai E _ od ewe «aRC UEos:R Rw0E3 uR n.U;eau E W0 CD L Ctm Z O : Y C f0 QLr. _.� O O ro a'.r 'C 0 .1°9 A-0 a'i FQ 'ai m,= > ��:C Q ro =-C � £t O �L u+a` Eo 3Wm�'= o o roma�,",E��w a, o ._ - E ?Gp,� m rn m� a'E v av ,�_v n� co m o x a V' ♦ cn r Z :" 2 V .0 "> 'ro w. .n O rn .O'o .0 i O n Yn r ----- --- P*With t,+,r.:h1.04. Knack off AFC rival t ` t� with two 4th -quarter touchdowns 20-19. NFL report, 11 12C "nnyTestaverde: 3-7D passes fa Yankees'straWIierry jailed again:1, 4C Tv_esday SSeptember 12 .2000 , Newsline.7, dl Markets slump on tech sell-off Ikn V )rnzes industrial average "dile ?s.I6lots to� ` z 1,19549. PJasda ; p0 ; q r< d n 4 r16 pnintc to 38963 tear LIDIAM hnn,i yield n5ei 3. 1,413, ' EiSA 70�hs intern z 1(ur F.iVls 3.3� [0 7s3.9f1 aB ► japa rr Nikkei average is dos ^n 7 1 points, tl81,07 +F O M a: ! a.m. F1 roda rmn =s 10r,.12 ver doll . I t nn_ kn g < €TanR Sent drop 3o-,, LR . to 16.7p3ai O, Release of nuclear scientist held up Well Hn Lee e p tett rn ac 2pt a:pi a deaf in the 01 Alamo, nirc!ear crers cas., remains {ailed as his ^"rose crani and ,.rewwrs haggle! over details. 31t Teen stnokerc hooked quick ly,studyfinds Nli otin addr tion evident in marry young —moi—em r. ithin day . of first light. Genetics and phys- +ai d�telnpme ttplaV a hig min, journal reports Ip. Ad bans abroad den 1 snuff outc1garette logos. IB. — -- { The public is wary of Fire- ■For 11 Fxpk Waiting, waiting. Passenger jets lineup at San Francisco International Airport Ittereasr t stone tires - and to a lesser. �" IiAct; re ' } airports need to expand, but marry are surrounded by development and have little tooth tau congested US. "extent Ford litcploreis _'af- ' all 0 6.5 million t,um,t 1y i,•,, - Using alternative sites may be a better solution rereta most on the sport tire', vehicle, and report, of at least R8 deaths, a USA TO- os mo side R . + F ntPht addrsc By Fred 1lryles MiCNNIGallup Poll shows. shudrnts on the Inii- LISA TONY ' � "y I Z t t_• r I , IN herndreds of people and businesses About 77% of 1,19? mil- a '" ' a roti... earn gl�nda morning;n Bloortrrnet°ir. forced to mlbcate and the delays sttmerssurvevof 1.1 7 Con- 12 -page Bonus Section E won r be fixed. Rd ana's Knight goes an the offensive Bhe notion'; Mn-- For so �\ said they at least would be, •m— of the nation's busiest air_ The monev would less likely to buy Firestone w +a •aaem ;�; Y y opened f ours after h! dismissal. Bob Knight ells hes players p Its, the planned Galva. �/ be hetter spent, they tiles because ofcoverage of a re rft I team meetire that he plarrs to corlrinue tion from growing flight say irWisting in ten- ^;tile let 311 The griesLion has ► EXp l0I 7achin He Gro: s to nay his acs delays is to pot it, more run- derused airports, re ('a.marginoferroruf</-3 pet- stanzs salaries tvay concrete tired military fields , cenrage points problem end if +heyleare4he univnrsitt+ iC. ,' and neky airports to outlying + ► 1h s.ene in Honsrerland 16C Same Protects are as ` i Phil Parse, Fi estnnedirer_ 0, SOrIMe pr ► Re,d_rs' vie,vs on Knight's ouster. 3C. coct!v, as then are ambi- areas where land is cheaper and for of consumer cite brand Slow t0 Todays debate: Firing of Bob knight. ZRA tions: a $6 bilk tit pxpan- the population more welcoming. ( marketing, isnt surpricetl IacP tit sionPlanatAtlantaklarts- t "We are crowding ground and air -"once we get through zhe, p hildren carry on, alone, after parent dies field a vet unpnced runway , _:: , traffic into one place while'rile nnp- ?recall process, it will be, our challen e t c n Ica, a .ght b a matiabr trend in sm in to San 1 ranrtceoBaS^ S t.6 oilhnn ulation and deyelopnaent are grrhv_ 1 numbers,"liP said Q ° ha ^h ,Id,. flee chileren s; hose parents died keprqui- for runways and taxi :ays at Cleve- in sornewhere Re,'' says VitkP Gm l Tize sunlev fourxl that of 47s ennlr svi nd carried on, even alongside the ceruses. 16A. + are 'earmarns.ked Additional billions Cover stor j d� ouchmayof E! Segundo, Calif„ l prestousiv would h,n:e considered buvin� h t are earntarked for leen pals rand lust south of -Los Angeles Interna- 44.,, novo said they ar least yvnUIdbe less like ruse: 011 l)rlCes hit Guif War levels 1 cargo facilities at ins Angeles ]nternational, Chicago` The fight over Lambetionatrt5tport. Louis lnternationaT Air- oenta e tore Wars past 535 a barmt as expert warn of a one. That question has' a maiginof errgr of G Hare and scores of °cher airpor[so port, a busy hub for TWA and a>gmwiog Southwest Burge po st okesmait Via: energy crisis and pas;ihty a recession. 1B. V` brie no one has a cumulative rust for all the pro Airlines-operatror...is, rypicaT Lastrbert is landlocked, P Ken Zirm said he c+x s. !Pi) energized by ti:e-'new economy" have "Pets, a mvriew of the nancnat wish hst svggects the surrounded by suburban developments. factories I plorer sales to stay strong. "i remain confider;, ind!ed a 8_daling firms become gun-shy 1 g. t figure, could approach SRO billion during the next taro hotels. After a two -decade battle: airport officials have p Dries and -tire Explorer brand and Orel dealers at the poi; ► ldenun iifeve. nae of tricks. Your R7onev 3B. decades. e to address ari tit- issues;' Ile said. But some wonder if the money is being s finally won approval for a thirst runvvay. The recall vvas announced At12: Sports: McGwire hits first HR in months t tient places Critics say the money being ii t on new w But td ito_ceill come at a cost: neighboring Bridgeton 0,8� to 40.157 in August fent l,he Ca duiak. sluff er who has been sidelined since I rumQays at already airpnrtc vgiB-prove onlya Budin ! .o of its community m bulldozers in- marketing information at a-,vc,, r liar. I 6. has only one plate appearance per night 5C i stopgap against the ¢rowing' number of flights and g schools and two churches that wi{I be re sales are still -very rohv ft:t (il f, a A -1 innthall Qa rev only in high schnnl: One 'Passengers. In the end, then say, bi!lidnsw 11 be spent ) Seventy-eight percent n(p c� Ir ,ur -cod;. p Please see COVER STORY next page ► 1 #nx e followed th tire case dei . l :.,r ,,rJ ng -. - _ - ,mil, -,to ..+�e �a.•....,, ..,. ,.. .:..bi. : �.•�>°°'t F+ t'ai:°wG m ea"vc " _"° .D��>7 wX �;Ow�' AZ 2-- Ed a c'v -F > me =x p d j m v �••o.R ^-yGRvn+a.`a_lc zaC'.G3RG. �'°-^".L tay�"�^'o .' ��=�o�N =�',Ae'cO�c'CgECa"'-.: c'>oECEEGa'..4>ym S, •`.4 O'° -;GL¢Lmc�>s°aER o :� � � ,°EEa000wR_�a�xoy' � Znc�-e'-"s,� ❑�p my��'vv`e^+°�e�°'+c�3oy cr m�-mac E- F¢�� t $xa°J u:° o,o¢ me va.C`€�E`°'Rk yaOE az Yrs$ Rasa' v"c '`°�" cfi ut, a?T m gE:35. �Do s-om �??o- a -c ° PH°cLG3�aaam. m vmRmewoav�Qv �anAQEao w' d=s-,a,i3rt._eaen °' t`o `m¢n�'b pm s'ea 'gym a. ps Y nDoNf{tmo omu OE> B R c exp .. t �,-oac'oo °c°,c..o�..te•aa�sa,`o D a_oo o... •p boo -0 a g3mGm'm °°ew>�o, to °�3-r-m- 80.5. �y._;de =a Ca Em` �d �+>$oe ka 5 Z.'eEeoo=?=..>+aea'ne�-oa�93$'�.'o Ra:G,cQ-a°i i £ mEscTo. m3>> 3 0�- co ee=a+ c'AQ� J CO $$ R.N� E a ?Q-oa3oGR��yyma=.n R° cvha�RElL 5�occ�ca wm ec E3Lc >tm"Lm�+E"c 3m3v�n .mph ao$ ou' Ey> baaa _c O y Op L�L m' y..gtmG Diy Ry-L=e+ m M H Ec o`wc,Q cn�_a wroy"'�re=I.g�tio- .-& >,s -�a.-�=-Ev'°s..v°C. ao=-mics=V3 td cQ_ca4ar'aC7v =..°''34 a'A ��$'=�d'�y$s y' �'wll�l' a. i �N. fl=a g3da,cg�y'cr�cu`o>'om`^qu plc£ �.G='''°�.L u�ao.��yasncac c oaEv€'wo v M.!d, GtiG�EccGacp 'c�aa¢3o=: 3:'- Eu� pca D�,�ELa0r- =6C==6=as'��o`,ma�mEtQ asEan�'SEmLocE E ia';e w �cg�Gcq,E� Lma Loc v ^tiD c�n� 7x�e', 9& a E+�mori3 i - L >a�co Expo oy m,.�3 `mc o�mma:eno a cmcos= ; 1 T �c cm'e mrS-E Fav °p �L GcDw"iv°'ca_o=Dosuamc c� �0a 3r c'3QRwoo�nFo=en_cca�3N.o� �n its c °i c E°J �•c •�C�"m`^O`a be- V R V a'C7 D m m py Cy m Dtp e+p m.a�L`w'L W �.i+ E'm -Sp.0 w.p -��•.. �r .�� a�.0>m.+^O.pan°': ¢'ra Aow Jme Gmia o ds EZ o - m dvsar ��//��► 2' We cna �� m33t oo�y� ro EL n.E3LE_ $ m�caa0i - O -J a.a ICU GcmF: a<x bog Go° m'ano ao sg�m h ac co��Eo �aC� 3 =3u ^3 a+ G_�- ,c Lu G G `u r n o o - 3so�cEa -w EES,: sDo rac- aga s2 �5c �/� ac w.u+eage 3 =E— wv,` R h 4 ��acaoa>wGo 2om2wc a,c cmamMimhox mN ¢ s: a b0 m t �" ,n m C 9 _ CC rr,rr 6/v �L 'D N GOp-p w YL bO cL G¢x�m xy TC. E R'« w m'C Fn •�� `.o�w.- s„R� cVoR-9tew -. ww uC Nm -'�i^9a:eicC 3+pasAa� .0oR.•'Ru aH�'JGu La>+v: .�e0 G=.a,oL "ia��, Ke_>d0u-7.�°y�i'�fly�eea{��aaDaii =aEuAQe°„oc a LoHcmaagu.� °adRc9g �" cG.�06 `�Ya==x NCJFPn°`a•-� C.-. RDD:3 >'w T- - �6X TC+T m.D.CC � �a m�� =° Gd �'•3 d O' CL A 7•- .,m 3°C� w. •Q `y'o cGcg--3 0._=�oE.a o•^coeom`� �,m; a¢�Q�i,c_cy€ °dSc,a¢ p ma, a. w .er a.E w_ oA Z c. D m. •.- c c >, p. eo>, c aoti EwEZ`^.cmc'^�'a�c°.ti =s �Q aa'u"r, o oc'-oso�3aL. r s Ea'mo'p.?_ �` o w�_ R"°^s.cLp_au�y�pN ec Ego; oa�p�E=EC i E.A •+,�G u .. Z:..- C "�' _ V"�L i V.L umry,> E m'GO ep�2 CE-0 am �'y Lc O`.O GC.:o m.o vi�pp mG ud-C :. XCL M.G n GO � 6E>'>e:. _ zzcEca -L a c�a- a, Rb^DH 'n0 GG�3v'Lv¢ m Ec 2 r.- 0 O E oRgn w�u c �dOOu��c9 °°°c°ia.�RoW`� a=, co' ac, n6 y' Ec c-stizc',rY°>•v C��... sy'CC p°pp^=egie�L_a..�: 7 d X T:G+ s. D C T �O a m �.:O a iy C La m'. m �.� G �:.. m C m"° G 3 N °q C m,S yen c°oGE3v c' a ppom eQao.-c `off p a3aoG-a�5� rs EmyEaaC' a �moy.�>�u 2 Z. y mw. o _'a v �Tom3'v.c4cEuac co a yLw^acc�c�cGP°LS a. G eoe LO'� o �a� tse Fa �y^ -Rol: a �..° RC N.v-ymi �.p m DAC si z>,L� R, .ie 'per-LiA¢O� a ,fie°+ UmGi,L.-pC 8 3 0 °' G s% e c o m ^ o G.D iv : m _t Via. .. m " Ry. ,co o¢ '^ r^.Y O R �._:.e r .�a e."2 m 3 c;c o �T a a'cm .�oao�,�-cG�r^ao"w a awm Q�aic 'm 3c o p a+ 'e u 2vcimo a4c=° 35 �¢n3` EBD��Eo oP�_c 3oa aL,cEv� � °a c m E.6 of ,n lii I I - it THF `To injure no manx RXI ll nd' but to blessall mankiCIIENCIE t BOSTON _• WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 4, s 2040' • Key choice for crunch Old airports ■. Expand big hubs' or build more regional airports? Billions of dollars are at stake. By Daniel B. Wood Staff water of The Christian Science Monitor EL SEGUNDO, CALIF. —'Reeling fro -in two summers of record Congestion and delays, Americas airports are at a crossroads and in the cross hairs. Amid dramatically rising de- mand for more flights by_travel- ers and cargo companies, air- ports are under unprecedented pressure to improve service. Already, 80 of the nations busiest airports have earmarked $80 billion to boost facilities be- tween now and 2020. The federal ov e grnrn eat,: meanwhile, has dou- bled, its annual funding for run- ways, terminals, and other, im- provements from $1.9 billion last year to more than $3 billion through 2003. Now, in hearings this week be- fore the aviation subcommittee of the US House - and in dozens of local battles nationwide - ac- tivists and legislators gklat ors are clashing over what is the best way, to use that money. Af issue are two dif ertlt views Of the u _ tore. One wo-ald expand existing major metro airports in an attempt to provide compre- ensiv=- service and 1o,ver prices. See AIRPORTS page 4 Z. o !t -- P F eco Et,m O� �*r.J' .Cmma°+pp «'++ u o>v ► 3� :3 e C Rs O(� ves..ri fl i+ ,b0G av�i v v ��" v N O Qom' O CSQ O IV O=_ a1 O m v m6>'m Q v w Co p>v'p Rt is �' v zt v t]. m y v yet m ,� +» x . S ' m O >+ i. S3 w t L" Q c' p t3 ... y ay a�3 as�A�o O, U�,�.so.� d tL ,om�,.a= �B<yw U'.v0 5.dm,•c�= 65v o�v+-ts_5p.�.Uw4.a.>Q�' a,. a V uo,q CD w. o a Nr i� �' w. a a O $ a .a �, v i, ° 'o C, ca o cn A..ar nv= y o o a x a�3 ops >,�3{-- v a: u y � W -1;..a aw oc o e4+�S°z7`Crc.op, °w' ., Ls m. v�`o " v3_ d3 �°'a50 CD N y p¢� ai, II .w� m esf O w o O C • m ,fin V Q q� t/1 �,:4q A. tr.. y F'r "'' ii m i.."`i Co c vv v' u �' av ;,, t)yo n"i;:,c�. �$. oamu° v o° `a' W d'' " °� o°.:°' a ° um) c"A C7 3• a. H � � 5ME Go .tea --Q 6w ul m i 8'o5 u� U � � +a v LT, �,� 1 „ `�� - � O � C y�.^ O m c� � � O ❑ r vi c .� � .>. m t4 �.� a � v w y � m v O� a'U,b Ov�mvyzxmO�v'Q�CLvv.,cvi�Ca�i.,O { "b� O c� svv,.0 °'Iqy C II °'cro Cl 1LS'1{ ul r mCIS o G o a .p > 5 an .J v Q O> w G z o O �c L w ( CU a� 7� 5 7 > •� O +"� p� � as O 'Q m ^O v c� R.. m U ,Q .C3 Q V „ v ° .t i � m ,;,, O 0 >1 bt�j='� awn �,16 oU ` .a�.o m o}'��,P. y w y i o Q C cC v a m v >,*5 v `0 i, „ v y v y. O a �.. w >, v L1, °cC Q cc RI o y Sl u> i °� ,C T3 c w C. °.°. > co O 0 o Sc a � 5 r� �,� yc r ce.'my c o ° 0 (L) a m 3`� o c � a� '+�-W :3 a o V 67 Q mcn c� a o w u i Q w iso" l. o 0 m v c vm"5uUcm Zsm C4 3o 5 q a v C m m Rs O m° v a O C t. wl m� +' c6 w it. o V/ ,.aaaru �.o v'� mO o oow = Rt >,ttiD A'«.og3r1^ c+ -e c m v ai O m v n4 w°°" m Z ° O y 5 O 'S CL +a R o C c '" ca 5 m :: ,^. v w S o $ u '� C '" 3 T$ � O I/ aa�a�: mai ?:¢~a: -0 o o.aw o❑c wu" „5 R A m v R .Q > w c m C 5U in N 'Q n c� O GFi m 5:2 v 3 m .Q O v m c cc c O Q 5 i II.°.v �tl� o >=0 o v v v Ga ° io•Q Q c o °Cpp�$ y c'` ,C t> =.�'� v D•, L p.+ v O 'O Q 7,'Cy" .O 5 GUxU °°.� 01 aizsb ° °w' A c°5 `1 .°ate cn'O w r�r Ri O 4 my 5«0 oO,•v vm>m•, {0m5¢+�'�¢G.'., .vQ K4dLi .v y.owaO� =Lmaw 5OctOQ.f. yccp6i 'c04 CGvv°3 C, EA aO v O^ob° t m ° w o ° a� O C oO o`d° b';{ ID.v vcc o'U-a O 0 o �+bcav173 ,. . m o - Q a [0 a� a. w R5 Ov al 00vO 00 nb>Fcc d °Q" . mco v O`cts O O0RO C O w o o CaONvV°i, «vVm. ' 5f °�0 EacN oL �a � a ab v oo 1G .o PC.§ 0nv~ v5� ,gib�ob�mo b,y ;, W .m;'.Utn0 ❑w c°� O cU ami aJ avi G O$ �' 3 6 m O Q cm W w m c cn a, s. Q ,- C a b v: o 5 CO t, o v —• c� m S o p c v Ems= th' Q,v •� _. Q Ov o v" 4-, c a5 m in o E 3 C See LAX 1 Page 13 Re' opal airports et a lift ll,. Study: No need td expand LAX By dick Orlov Staff Writer Traffic and environmental problems can be avoided without sacrificing economic growth if LAX expansion plans were scriEpped in favor of developing regional airports, a Southern Cal- iforpia Association of Govern- ments study said Wednesday. The SCAG study by CIC Research Inc. of San Diego was sued on bycrities ofthe proposed s 12;billion- expansion of Los - `- Ang es International Airport that is being pushed by Mayor Richard Riorjdan. 'o "We think this validates the argument we have been making , from the outset," said El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon, who heads a group of neighboring, cities Opposed to the expansion. "What is significant is that , Mayor Riordan has been saying that the reason LAX had to expand was that if it didn't, the region would lose the opportunity for business growth." The study commissioned by the regional planning agency ques- tioned that, saying LAX would continue to be a significant influ- ence but that growth of other facilities — particularly the pro- posed El Toro airport in Orange County —would ease some of the strain. "Given the relatively small dif- ferences in overall economic impacts, it would seem likely that the planning decisions among the alternative regional aviation - development scenarios may be more strategically related to environmentaland transportation See LAX 1 Page 13 yg 4 - CL n. g 13 Cv {f �a y r L N ��s a (n ��mo.;3$� xma•cs t >x o> E�dto'm -WdmL�d,,....°Rp oR$¢ osEcW tep c r 1 C an 4—J vJ -- m y G y- E• aj Vl `VG. [Q 9 �U > - .•.i 4--+ 1� � �. 5 �,c�cQQS c G.• ams � t o.U1328 a o a a 4r wr�5 A06 0 �Ea • C a ! v L30�x n, E E ar s N V VJ io s�3 10, iy.y..°C om 01196 I�c�s�dums>E tw ��^ Qy34014G=Gy��yLOgyi— Eara �rcv33 °•V y33�� L E m 7 _ .- - is 30a o c Amo m !� yg 4 - CL n. g 13 Cv {f �a y r L N ��s a (n ��mo.;3$� xma•cs t >x o> E�dto'm -WdmL�d,,....°Rp oR$¢ osEcW tep c r 1 C an 4—J vJ -- m y G y- E• aj Vl `VG. [Q 9 �U > - .•.i 4--+ 1� � �. 5 �,c�cQQS c G.• ams � t o.U1328 a o a a 4r wr�5 A06 0 �Ea • C a ! v L30�x n, E E ar s N V VJ io s�3 10, iy.y..°C om 01196 I�c�s�dums>E tw ��^ Qy34014G=Gy��yLOgyi— Eara �rcv33 °•V y33�� L E m 7 _ .- - LA dressed a dozen people at Cafe Boogaloo in Angeles City Council and other Southern California cities that increased air traffic Hermosa Beach on a Sunday afternoon. FROM PAGE A 1 should be spread among a number of air- "It was the first time eve given a ports rather than concentrated at LAY, speech in a' bar — at Ieast officially,' transcends the "not in my back yard" Using some of the $1.2 million it set aside for fighting the LAX Master Plan, McDowell quipped. Hundreds more telephone calls, trips approach. Council members — especially Mayor El Segundo hired Gladstein & Associates, a Santa Monica -based environmental and ' and speeches must be made to swell co - alition membership to 100 by the end of Mike Gordon - have spent hundreds'Of political consulting firm, to help develop the summer, which is El Segundo's goal. hourspreparingand delivering anti -ex- a battle pan, Soon, El Se gundo will try to reel in 13 pansion talks, often traveling several times a week Southern Cali- Tailor-made itches p north Orange County cities, plus Palm - ..throughout fornia Dennis Zane, a former Santa Monica dale,- Burbank and Longe Beach. "For'a city that small they have taken city councilman and mayor who at the At the same time, El Segundo is trying tog et $25,000 to $50,000 in financial aid a yeoman's task and done a great job so far," said Gardena City Councilman Ste- time worked for aGladstein, advised El Segundo to tailor its anti -expansion sales from each of its coalition partners, Gor- 'Ci ven Bradford, whose city joined the anti- pitches to each area don said. Santa Monica and Culver ty have kicked in $15,000 each and $150,000 expansion coalition. "They've definitely raised the issue to other cities." So in speeches to South Bay cities, El Segundo emphasized noise, pollution and has been pledged by several cities in San The expansion —backed most strongly triflic In the lnlan d Empire, the Riverside counties, plus the counties themselves, he said. by Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan angle was that LAK expansion would eat — would add runways and reconfigure upstate and federal money that could be Pressure tactics cargo areas and passenger terminals to spent on expanding airports in San Ber- Building a united front and amassing a boost annual capacity to 98 peo- nardino and Riverside counties. Safety hefty war chest is fine. But to accomplish ;million ple in 2015 from 61 million today. Annual issues were stressed in the San Gabriel anything, the coalition must wield its cargo capacity would climb to 4.8 million valley, where many cities are beneath power effectively, Gordon said. tons from 1.8 million to the LAX flight path. That will entail bringing public. pres- Supporters saythe a expansion would And. in Orange County, where a' debate 'Toro sure on everyone that has a say in , the bring billion in trade and m`to is ragg over El airport develop- expansion, including state and federal d-. gio the region and create 367,000 jobs. obs. meat, El ' Segundo' argued that LAX ex- ficials and regulatory agencies; mull. Airport staff `members are considering pansion would discourage airlines from venturing south to any new facility. dates lining up to succeed Riordan when his term ends in 2001; the L.A. City Cour- four expansion alternatives and will ommend one to the Board of Airport Assembling the coalition has been a . cfl; and the Southern California Aswcia- i Commissioners likely within the next t formidable Eight to 10 telephone calls accompany tion of Governments, which allocates transportation funds. few months. Lengthy environmental views will be done before any expanswn each antiexpansion presentation, said LAX afficfals commend II Segundo for plan goes to the Los Angeles City Council Gordon, who estimates he spends 20 to 25 positioning itself to have a voice in the ,for final approval hours a week on coalition -related work. upoommg expanswn � debate. But they say If El Segundo has its way, that wlll When II Segundo � �g its case in the Inland Empire, Gordon said, Irs premature to talk about specifics until an expansion plan is approved. never happen he made the two-hour round-trip com- Zane and Gordon, however, say the co - City: officials and residents see the mute two or three times a week, on top of alition already has succeeded in wres- $8 billion to $12 billion airport expansion, running his marketing business,' attend- , fling momentum away from the pro -ex- . as a potentially fatal threat to their. cozy ing to other city matters and spending' forces. little community, the northern boundary time with his wife and four children .pansion "I think (Riordan's) office has to concede of which abuts LAX. "I was joking I'd have to start paying: we've won the opening rounds," Zane said. But instead of a lepl flgh#, El 9egtstlo i 'b► bye out,ibere.' Goedan said w -r--, newer took us seriously and now decided to focus on persuading the Lm COMCBmen NWDvMR add he wn at !bell hove a doglisht on Owk hand&" t 4ag Cleo, C,6 ON THE INTERNET: www.LATIMES.CDW TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 1999 DAILY 2U CIRCULATION: 1.095.007 DAILY/ IJ85313SUNDAY COPYRR7{f.1991/T}IETIMES MIRROR COMPANY/CC/99 PAM DESIGNATED AREAS HIGHER - Broad Coalition to Fight Mayor's Vision for LAX ■ Government: The Riordan -backed expansion faces a challenge from other leaders who favor spreading airport growth around''the Southland. By JIM NEWTON TIMES STAFF WRITER Banding together. in an effort to isolate and defeat Mayor Richard Riordan, a broad coalition of Southern California govern - meet officials has sketched a blueprint for the region's air transportation future that spreads out its growth rather than'concen- trating it at Los Angeles International Airport. - Leaders of governments from El Segun- do to San Bernardinointend to unveil their efforts Wednesday. But they already have succeeded in winning the endorsements of more than 65 city councils, county boards of supervisors and others who believe Riordan's emphasis on LAX expansion is misplaced. They favor a smaller LAX expansion along with construction of an airport in Orange County and relatively modest growth at an additional 10 regional facilities. In a sense, the dispute between Riordan and the coalition is one of degree: Both sides say they support regional solutions to the growing air traffic demand in Southern California. and both agree that some ex- pansion of LAX is in order. But though Riordan generally has advocated one of several solations that would add at least one runway to LAX, increase its passenger capacity from 60 million to 98 million a year and massively upgrade its cargo flow, the coalition favors afar more modest LAX plan, one that would increase traffic there' to just 70 million passengers a year, - Please see AIRPORT, 88 TOT hers are not only challenging Rior- mining economic growth and envi- 1 1 dan's approach, but also question- ronmentai health far ,beyond their Continued from Bl ing his facts. Riordan, for instance, often ar- own borders. "One of the things that we can combined with the other regional gues that most air cargo travels no longer tet occur." said Riverside airport improvements. Opponents of the proposed LAX inside passenger planes, snaking it County Supervisor Tom Mullen, "is expansion represent a variety ,of hard to send cargo to one airport and : to let one parochial body or person interests, ranging from South Bay passengers to another. But in inter- make decisions that will have ef- and Westside cities that want to views Monday, leaders of the coali- fects on the rest of the region." curb the airport's growth. to Inland tionsaid that's not true; that in fact, In theory, San Bernardino or Empire municipalities that want a majority of all air cargo now travels in so-called designated cargo another municipality could go ahead with airport expansions re- new airports of their own. "The NIMBYs and the wannabes," one planes, and that number is expected gardless of what happens at LAX.' wag has dubbed the group. to rise in the next 10 years. But :two things' keep that from Nevertheless, the coalition repre- Michael Armstrong, an analyst happening, according, to members 'the sents a potentially formidable obsta- with the Southern California Assn. of the coalition. One is that cle to Riordan and his backers for of Governments, said a recent proposed LAX expansion is so two reasons: Its members come from study by his organization supports the, coalition's position, not the expensive—estimates range from $8 billion to $12 billion -that it across Southern California and thus mayor's. Depending an the season, would eat up virtually all federal it enjoys broad political appeal, and between 56% and 64% of all cargo' airport expansion money` for its counter -proposal moves away from efforts to highlight a single is carried in all -cargo freighters, Southern California. The other is LAX alternative and instead- sug- the study concluded. Although seemingly arcane, that that as long as new airport capacity is promised for LAX, the airlines Bests the appealing notion of re- point looms targe in the regional serving the region have no incen- gonal sharing of the burdens and airport debate because if such com- five to begin looking elsewhere. enticements of airports. "Everywhere we've gone, we've munities as San Bernardino,, River- So far, the issue of airport expan - found support for our proposal," said side and Palmdale can lure cargo flights to airports in those areas, sion has yet to attract much :public comment by most members of the El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon, who is leading the campaign. "We they might be able to build stronger Los Angeles City Council, who want people to understand that economies. The results would be probably will not, consider the issue theres a choice:' Mayor Riordan's more jobs for local residents and less traffic on the region's freeways, as until next year at the earliest. Councilwoman Ruth Galanter, who - plan versus the region's desire." residents of ' those communities represents the area around LAX, Riordan has made the airport worked closer to home. has led opposition to the expansion, expansion a mainstay of his second Leaders of those communities said but other members have mainly term, touting it as essential for the Monday, that they 'need airports to avoided the topic. region's economy and vital to help- drive their future growth, and that a ing the poor, who benefit from jobs regional solution to -air transporta- created by the airport as well as tion would benefit them with jobs the jobs it helps support. Deputy Mayor Noelia Rodriguez' and provide the area around LAX said the LAX opponents are prema- with some relief from traffic, noise and air pollution. They also ex- ture in criticizing plans for expand- pressed guarded frustration with a ing LAX. Noting that an environ- planning process that essentially mental impact report on the allows Los Angeles' mayor and City" proposed LAX expansion is not yet Council with the key voice indeter- complete, Rodriguez said: "The pro- posal isn't on the table yet We need to have that complete so we can have some real facts to talk about." The coalition and other LAX critics are not waiting however. They have hired consultants and already have lawyers lined up to challenge the LAX expansion if it is approved by the Los Angeles City Council and Riordan. Meanwhile, the 'coalition mem- I Ng a.e o g op'" co WA C6 P VR. ari pOpuK �y V ��•G •in u.�.rJ' p C �7 �. y . .� eug$m3v"m,a Lr 8-S'3 A OJr'S' y 7rt` CO o o a • r.y •T•+,j 8 cQ Imcea5"•o" a. � r a a"•u aym� {V� C "u a_ .3 9� LEOv Q u 3 o'd,avd•g `� S oily Film-� L p ycc t �q mp. p � � J� W i3M.A< o I WCD°y E PO a °_ o o54 ,,,-a,_5y • .m yLUa a -19..-• C ,q� g Wy�" E>�uc°s _oaTi�C oV E. cao06c u._�i o AU o v u.. L73 A A _t.3 E t c > h ax g 8eRIcu:'Ciau�s-c�L'�� .m3 W aw ob°ca.55l�o"Oo��o5€. uv�o�cUGG;c"oEE�ucbToe as oue.°$ o'�'ii v _ �.. EL fl 0 o c o c c o"g $� mErg -5 0 5,�Y.EU�� _3m ffp o� o'p�5ui.c'$nyE$ 055 ppr v 4 c -.p '7 O =m M.919% OC C W vCi �7 Y U'_O ty L Q m3;00 �ujA U •� Oil OOM Z.=o oueE>_ Sua5r9i t>"c�l,E c � plc.. Q g°�aysEv�Hma��vozQaOf 0 0 ..�i�w3rr, uQE if b 6 yo$ToeS E� oo`uu�., ou��gg�;v�L'ju�rg �og 90c..L ■- vol.^o$�Y �''•' �ti� •A`oua��'vo�,`p3 moa. C 3g�L�.7 r..r•sbro=br��.°<2c �._ gg >r�Q�Ypp'>o Qai3vo Q'pEg�L�v - � �.. CO ii u.G 0! Y. �rJu. pu � ��.°L 3 A ��,m^ �.� •�W ep. wig's g 5rSue ipr+T5Sao U.O, m y os �.�<5. rs mr�_v aw- 1-4:2 .a o,Og'6a $E�$ �b,^°,� 55 Cl Qi p 0.5 3 di° ��oo g u.rol $•Ea."�'�• y O T V w "� � � N a . �u•z !.� � a, � '�y°i r� o � �.r ��Cu � 515' a .9 -- m YS > a st •�.s'v mz' q lyeyta }}1� a K• � Q'S C.$� iy �r - ooh o'er V Nc1 ooQ� �pN !�-.�.mou � - =�vui$ -all 5� vaYpa�9 $uo +.�eoE$.�c tae=g��a�;Vo mo 2... U'., EL' cE.�a c E = >-V;!aE m Lu �• p u u,. €€ice z� `'°; ap�9_ oLa d .5.uo � ��a ;_.E' LL of CGGu"Cia°tea 3b'ep� �"MR N •,-�ur�m52�ool6z�•�a9gen, iii3YYY ~ � s 2 c E u V , ° ?� � L' u u 3 M. E'u6Ogg�e?rLv5�q�,�t`o�3 - THEL JOURNAL. - - ©-)999 THE WA U.STREET JOURNAL. I CALIFORNIA _ WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 1999 �jn{� Group ry i I f Ly V rou fv T Y i (� LAl1 Booster Group member advisory committee included top names in the Los Angeles establishment. T1 �Tt� % r r Falters as t But only a month later, things took a ung turn. Mr' Riordan, dissatisfied with Boosting LAX, t Uses the expansion effort, caused a shake-up at Mayor's Backing the Airport Commission that led to Mr. Garda's departure. The mayor went on to Went Nowhere appoint John Airport ,then LAX chair - w G . man, to the Airport Commission. Mean- Continued A oin Page CAI time, Mr. Garcia took over at LAX 21. Airport boosters have suggested that BySHIRLFY LeuNG the business "community," says Barbara the mayor saw Mr. Garcia's continued s1G1f Rcp"rta 1f'r a WILL s-meer JOURNAL LOS ANGELES—A year and a half after Yanow Johnson, an adviser the mayor hired last May to work on LAX issues. presence in the expansion project as`a challenge to his leadership over the, - taking off on a mission to promote the ex- pansion of Los Angeles International Air- "More and mare, it became dear it had to be a regional approach." pro jest, and the Riordan administration's sup- '21 port, a high-profile booster group called LAX 21 has practically fallen oft the map. So with LAX 21 now grounded, at least port for LAX immediately withered. Not really having (Mr. Riordan'sI out - The reason? Personalities and politics. one business group is trying to fill the void. The Los Angeles Area Chamber of Com- right support on the fund raising hurt us" says Mee Lee, LAX 21's executive director. LAX 21 leaders say Mayor Richard J. Riordan—who initially gave his blessing to merce is vowing to launch its own cam- Adds Richard Lichtenstein, president the fgroup's effort _raise sector paign for the expansion, which advocates say could mean as many as 20,000 more of the Los Angeles public relations firm Marathon Communications and another fundss frromom the business community fora n—has >, campaign—has pro-expansionP .g jobs. "I don't think people fully understand -LAX 21 founder: The group "became a m f- his su the past year. C, what happens at LAX and how important it is to our economy," says chamber Presi- - litical football, and contributors no longer - wanted to contribute." terDanwn m- ter Dan Garcia: the hornier Airport Com rt mission president who had a falling out dent Ezunial Burts. By the end of 1998, the booster club had with the mayor, took charge of the group. But any potential new booster group disconnected its hot line, suspended its Meanwhile; in recent weeks. the Rior- ought to be aware that anti -expansion board meetings and stopped collecting sig- dan-administration. under fire for the forces are gaining speed. Today, for exam. natures -25.000 names short of its goal. slackening pace of the expansion project, ple,,El Segundo Mayor .Mike Gordon and officials representing at least 75 suburban Commitment Questioned has signaled it may support creatinga ri- vat LAX support campaign. This group, the cities are scheduled to hold a news confer- So with LAX 21 dormant, ai airport expan- Ston planning delayed and a groundbreak- administration says, would be larger than LAX 21 and would look more toward re- ence urging that airport expansion be di- verted to other parts of Southern Califor- Ing during a Riordan administration un - likely, some business and laborleaders gional community support. So without the mayor's supportand the nia. Already, 81 Segundo, just south of LAX• has dedicated $1.2 million—or 3% of fear the mayor has lost the political will to fight for LAX. Miguel Contreras, himself a money from business and local leaders its municipal budget—to legal and political that had followed, leaders of LAX 21— whose name optimistically looks to the 21St efforts toward that goal. El Segundo op poses the expansion because of the extra r� k 21 noise and the century—are mulling whether to disband. Very Narrowly Focused' pollution city says it would suffer due to its proximity to the airport "This is Meantime, .within Los Angeles City >-A� tragic." says Mr. Garcia, a Warner Bros. executive who was president Hall', Councilwoman Ruth Galanter, whose district includes LAX, has revived efforts11 $S COrii-�a` of the five -member Airport Commission— which oversees the city Department of Air toe xpandairport operations at Palmdale— almdale ports—from January1996 until he resigned PO theAn- remote County Cam ch of northeastern LOS An some 5o miles away from + r� QSfj under pressure last year. He says 'the mayoral administration wanted a change LAX, where city officials bought property m leadership.' but won't elaborate on the the in 1,968 for a second airport. She says LAX 21'?i s failure indicates _ yD circumstances of his departure. Mr. Garda, who also helped found LAX that despite what business leadets say 21, does say the turmoil isn't "good for the about the necessity of enlarging the air- Riordan appointee to the Airport Commis- city- 'm personally more than willing to step asand someone else grab this ided l � Port, those at the grass-roots level are skeptical icai. "It's this blind faith that said sionan executive secretary -treasurer of Angeles County Federation of y the horns. f don't see anyone willing and 'Thiis good for business,'" she says. nor, says he asked the mayor about his aLa- ble:to do that.' Growing DLssattlsfaction dedication to the project. Mr. Riordan's re - Although the Airport CommissionWhen Mr. Garcia and others founded sponse? Recalls Mr. Contreras: "I'll get back shak shake-up was widely reported last- year, the mayor's office denies',tt forced out Mr. LAX 21 in December 1997, the aim was to Farman airport booster dub that was lode- Kelly M" Machin Mr. s commit chief n Garcia nd heleft left mist voluntarily. As fo r LAX 21, the Riordan'administratian the Rio pendent of cityr government, and therefore f,in staff, insists' he remains committed to an Dan expanded LAX. "It was never ever our ex- rysis��thratt group tsays he necessary support for able to marshal un or bitter) con- could lobby fo the poll tical needs Of the project- P jecL The ro airport overhaul estimated Peetstion that there would be a ribbon-cut- ting before the mayor left office" in 2001. y tested Project. to cost between S8 million and S12 billion— would add as many as 100 and in- Ms. Martin says the mayor hasn't fo- LAX ?1 as X 21: wwas very " narrowly focused on Please 7yirn to Palle Ct4, Column J gates crease the rapacity of the third-largest air- cured on the airport campaign because the technical components the LAX master rt in the country to million passengers Po .try P [;els tere in Plan continue to be refined—and probably by 261:5 from 61 million last year. won't be done until the end of the year. The coalition officially kicked off with a news conference in April 1998. After hiring And without a clear picture of the air• a full-time executive director. LAX 21 set port project. Ms. Martin says there isn't much for the mayor to do. You can't per - out to collect more than 50,000 signatures suade people to write big checks"' for an ex - as a show of community support. it also pansion campaign "unless you're going to raised more than S200,090 from business have a product to deliver,' she says. "Its and labor, while its executive board and,W the cart -before -the -horse problem." ,1 s- Eg 9 ice t 00) oiol N �^ m 99m EID— Lb € N I.— ;'� g c o � Ra --;;E,2c»..m m A,A 9 am to Doff Ema .E E E E�r��Eom APS o� Cram E�� /\ c m Cc Jd�oCcr e, c g Q < X00 Evc �a— E Z to E �m0 0°'3 `° wn o'5 Q= .1-:;t =m w r a- =cn aycn;RR E o yn� i - 3;;-c o ISA AAAA O E oS EollQ. -. Em£o�gg ox Cuao6m-- Lyy.£ > a�i"5 a`i 5ER'�CIgC m y m'*sEo� do��a'�gE'2�m OCd •O.O t6 O C o� N rj •p C.. S =Im m o p ym C d inodLmd F�Q.Od- co d d = y— Vd£c�" O V y y O y u cc rO y d d. y d O.Op 0m5, d O E ■ " a mELQQ. v a U Z m a L p G L 4 m y m 0 ` c :O L cn _ L w d y C'. m � V a p'II ' -. .y. R t- C C O00: m -- Lo Co W LL.,eao d oc royL �� have joined the coalition to help available.. IfLAX is permitted to pay for the effort; to date, El develop a master plan as pro - FROM PAGE A 1 Segundo has spent $1.2 million, posed, our communities will be Gordon said. Santa Monica and impacted in a negative fashion. hill in El Segundo that overlooks Culver City each have contribut- ed $15,000. We can't build our way out of the airport. Los Angeles City Councilwoman Ruth Galanter, At the crux of the issue for the coalition are several proposals this.., John Driscoll, LAX's executive credited during the news confer- encu for her longstanding soon now undergoing environmental director, called the coalition's tion against LAX expansion review by LAX officials. The pro- wish list unrealistic and prema. Plans, was on hand and called the posals would boost aviation activ- ture until the environmental ion a milestone for the anti- ity at other airports in Southern studies on the expansion propos- expan expansion effort. California but also hike the num. � are completed. He stressed Meanwhile, Rep. Maxine Wa- ber of passengers that take off that every alternative under can. ters, D -South Bay, blasted LosAn- and land at LAX — f'om.6o mil. lion to as many as 98 million pas- sideration calls for regional air- port expansion, but they all call geles Mayor Richard Riordan, who supports expanding the ca- sengers a year. for significant growthat LAX, pat ty at the °rt Cargo coming in and out of the South Bay airport could jump too. "For Mayor Richard persist is foolhardy,- said Wa� from 1.8 million tons to 4.8 mil- The fact' is, Driscoll said, people who live 'close to LAX' fly more ters, who praised the coalition for lion tons a year, say coalition members. And. the number often than those who live farther beingable #o come together on g "Enough lof flights could increase: annually y east _ a function of their jobs the issue. is enough. from 2,000 to 3,000 a day — mean - and their;incomes. We're tired of bearing the burden. No expansion at LAX." - ing a plane would take off or land "If you look at the demograph. every 25 seconds. its; ifs impossible to suggest that Waters said she already has The Southern California Asso. LAX could stop growing," Dris. support from Rep. George Brown ciation of Governments approved toll said a demand (for air Jr., D -San Bernardino, on the an- ti-expansion effort and plans to a regional transportation propos- al travel). happens to be predomi- contact the other members of the last year that similarly called for an increase in capacity at nantly around ' the South Bay, West L.A. I think people need to California congressional delega- tion. She praised the for LAX. However, a task force with. understand the dynamics of de. coalition taking action quickly, before Los in SCAG is now reviewing that plan to assess its impact on sur- mand. There is population growth but the ' demand is not Angeles officials have a chance to unveil their final LAX expansion rounding communities. there. Is El Segundo encouraging proposals. The Federal Aviation Adminis- people to close businesses and All but two South Bay cities so tration will have the last word on whatever plan is finalized move?" far have joined the coalition and Members of the anti -expansion SCAG has done studies show - have adopted resolutions against LAX expansion plans, which call coalition — especially those from the South Bay and Westside " — ing that 157million passengers a Year will catch flights by the year for new runways and terminals. argue that LAX does not need "to 2020 in Southern California, ex - The Torrance City Council has get bigger for the region to meet cludmg San Diego County. Of not taken official action but is, its aviation needs. They propose those, 94 million people will want scheduled to do so in upcoming weeks, and Rolling Hills does not capping Passenger loads. to travel out of LAX. Pass resolutions that are not spe- Otherwise, they say, streets and freeways around the airport will SCAG officials ftirther predict that the lion's share of new ln- cific to the city: "I'm aware there has to be a gridlock, worse Pollution is inevi- table land Empire residents will be regional solution to any FrePOSed and traffic accidents will climb. Any more than 70 million those who cannot afford to fly or those se who rarely travel LAX expansion' and I think there will be," said Torrance Mayor Y passengers a year is too man Y y' they predict, especially consider - Coalition members call those Dee Hardison.. "If nothing else, ing that'Playa Vista and several kinds of'predictions self-fulfilling with all the cities banding togeth- other major projects are at vagi• prophecies. er, it will indicate that there is not a simple sollition to the prob. ous stages of ,development in the "If you don't have quality air lem." ane area. "What travel, you don't have the benefits During the news conference, El you can see is, that con-- gestion in the South Bay would of it either," said Eric Haley, ex. ecative .director of the Riverside Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon become enormous,- Gordon said asked officials from cities that "There aren't enough mitigations County :Transportation Commis- sion ... ,.... ,._:-.-.. ...•_- vim._=.. �i�.�y .,,..-,<.,....«..u:,::�.r3.,.-"_,-..��-�.�...�,W�.,_�....�:�, ..:��_.----:i -. ._. ._-�.__ _-. ._ .__ _. Saw G.aMrQ. VA ter T ONE FRmAx, Aim 2, 1999 Coalition o oyes �p expansion of LAX_ City News Service does E1 Segundo oppose the expansion of LAXT To us, EL SEGUNDo —More than expanding LAY is the wrong answer to he right ques- 65 `transportation agencies tion. How should. Southern and° governments in three California ` capture the Southland counties, formally growth m the air .commerce announced that they are marketplace over the next against a plan to expand Los 20 years? Angeles International Air- "It makes no sense to con - port. The members of the un centrate both the burdens precedented regional alli- and opportunities of that growth at. LAX, when the ance want to see a thorough rem. onal plan for air trafic majority of growth expected issues in Los Angeles, San in Southern California over - m the the next 20 years is Bernardino and Riverside counties. And they said they Inland Empire", and North have more than b1 million Los s County.. Angele at their disposal to achieve When news of the alliance g surfaced last week, Los Communities near the air- Angeles World Airports port fear ,a bigger facility spokeswoman Nancy Castles will lead to more noiseandsaid a debate now is prema. ground traffic. Distant ture because the agency has groups feel the project not completed its environ - would deprive them of ion. view of,expansion. mental re spans transportation dollars. Ultimately, the Los Ange El Segundo Mayor Mike les City Council will decide Gordon spearheaded the co- on an expansion plan. The ailt`lon building effort. ort. matter is expected to be con - en we first beoanI "When Wh e stdered some time next was frequently asked, 'Why year Daily Bulletin Thursday, A.p ril I, ` 1999 a Area alliance earn g u p to combat LAX expansion By Jason Z. Cohen different approach to handling Daily Bulletin increasing air traffic in Southern California. Communities: from El Segundo Although the alliance enjoys to San Bernardino are teaming nearly unanimous support from up to oppose the proposed master the Inland Empire's municipal plan for expansion ofLos Angeles and county governments, the city International Airport. of Ontario is an exception, hav-. Representatives of the regional ` ,ing opted not to take part in the alliance presented their strategy Wednesday for recommending a See LAXID2 Story continued from D1 opposition, said El Segundo Mayor He said Los Angeles' side of the per year. It also anticipates the Mae Gordon. story hasn't been told. "I think airport handling an additional z',.7he city of Ontario is the only everyone needs to give Los Ange- 1.8 million tons of cargo every city- that did not support the res- les more of an opportunity to .say . year, bringing the annual total to olution. We respect their decision, what their plans are,' Ovitt said. 4.8 million tons. and we recognize that the city of The authority that oversees LAX The opposition group has pro - Los Angeles is a large entity „ " supports a regional approach to posed a regional airport plan within their community, Gordon meeting air traffic demand for the that keeps LAX at its current said. "As a result, they weren't future of Southern California," size and develops surrounding iitterested_in voicing opposition, said John Dnsmil,executive direc- airports tohandleincreased which I understand." tor ofLos Angeles World Airports. demand for air traffic. Debbie Acker, an Ontario City The Field of Dreams' argument The coalition plans to continue Council candidate whose business is - build and they will come — is just seekingsupport from other cities. aii; cargo marketing, said she is dis- not a truism in this business." Other plans action include try- appointed that Ontario Mayor Gary Gordon said Ontario and the ing to convince the Southern. Cai- Ovtt did not join the opposition. rest of the Inland Empire stand to ifornia Association of Govern - "He was the only one in the gain greatly from restrictions on meats todevelo a regional airport Southern California Association LAX expansion and the resultingP plan and lobby Los Angeles City of ;Governments who did not increase in traffic for Ontario Council members to vote against oppose the Los Angeles expan- International Airport. the LAX diaster plan as it is now sion," Acker said. "Ontario is not The communities in the coalition written, he said. on the agenda for Los Angeles. oppose LAX expansion for widely In addition, Rep. Maxine The agenda right now is Los Ange- differing reasons, Gordon said. Waters, D -35th Dist., pledged les expansion. ,That's Mayor Some opponents to LAX expan- Wednesday to fight the LAX (Richard) Riordan's agenda, and he's a very powerful man." sion contend that the increased ground traffic would create more expansion plan in Washington. "For Mayor Riordan to persist Ontario International Airport air pollution and congest already in the face of this opposition is is owned by the city of Los Ange- crowded freeways, and that the absolutely foolhardy," said les, but Acker said Ontario needs larger number of daily flights Waters, whose district includes to fight for its airport. "It is not in our best economic would result in more noise. "Any; expansion to the level some of the communities near. est LAX. interest to leave it up to Los Ange- "We that's proposed by the LAX airport SCAG is an important piece of les," Acker said. need indepen- dent studies and independent mar- commission, we believe, is going to have a terrible impact upon our the puzzle, Gordon said. The regional consortium of govern- keting.CPheairport)reallyshouldbe No. I on the agenda for Ontario." community," Gordon said- Gordon said other cities have meats is the agency that devei- Ovitt said Ontario prefers to joined in opposition to LAX expan- ops plans on which the federal government bases many trans - neither support nor oppose the LAX expansion plan but rather to sion in the hopes of increased traf- fi,c at their airports. portation funding decisions. promote itself. The LAX master plan calls for DWire services and the Los Angeles passenger traffic to grow from Daily News contributed to this 60 million to 98 mullion passengers report. 0 0 279 6 u L•-•� 9'0` E E� 3�u $' " as °� fa -a = n e`m mo .7 . q /6 F. .- - m,2 r.E .•SOY s m'V G .55 � e � R � Ste• oq. q o o ��$ � b $.a �.� � x c - yOpp Cs - aSiu•a a Q V to lJ •$ O RU ■ =G 8 •G•, O m 9 L O w UI 3 e Ug$ �•o$ Cz 56'SoN ° u_ya •� � 0 ° qah n'N ^u W � YY01 G v E $ q oUo p o Y= c� >` M. c s m E oi'- �� o u - O @ 6o v u e ov�L- *E' q or -.0 °p'o.5 � E >,U YO Vi WJE- ;>7. C Yq O C O V C q3 sE =fit V � C C T•Y'� V � v� •- r O S.be c oE o 9 o-EawEue - OR rz _e _ T9 e 9 •E 9 r Al C N.. qEsRt. Y�� Y m i O_ C 'a ;Ew m _ 0 > t 'a •o O.t G ul .km V O: G O� CLQ E y e .w•G Oc � c` cn m �'°•o ,,, E9.Ya.e'oc� A E .� � • u E` L• csC a€° c m u G•o'r Ei u c F ova a C 1t m f _v8iyE=c� 'az ane c..obrJro_'o$` u�o ow- ocis o$auEQE1a` mE.ee W$aEi ca a .�EE:5- Z2EB� � �O..�CL £ all cuc V O cis. A's, ,- i'.E Vq 7 etl.pd C N� v C r V V pC,p �%. aC7a, C O �eOO ��o oZm°0om _a��E>�Qi1 Q v C6 E_�io SE9S! u�'o9�;vt�E v� Mme �9cr6_ Cte` _'-aE� 0 e�is • C Y OggVO- 19,41� 9 CH "CC! =A Va-mC A:S:scis 'SCwEffie e C 06- -~--_ Ea,Pi3$aoa`�iuoa-vo, �. hl c' VvE4'a8DV> A.0> =°' oLrc be$me4, > .ea rmn>�°-��$'a= pvo=m EE 5.�mu45Z= o €mac �o °u°r >a$�°gym v > 8fc°c. 5m o>m� c aAW vc CO, `o$ m=DE20� c g�am.mo�9�L�o m�m�d E:um� •'�' O' r' a-S V-m CD= VL_yr:.. E_� �'v0_:S Kaci >a0 9cm-s�� EoEIQm U--a =��L, o ae.a -r'v'" o v e E a _ E p e. V s+`c2= uw >�$C •av ey�d,�L. Ep' E €�ra�ol-cca 4 O E Vo oa�' �vo$�'�E - o��o a-mi3 c�a8 aoui r�~°am m �b QQ oatat h �° o-9SmCEvaia� v°ala��9 c myo Lut:om sme$ m°d�c O O c U49° E y= gS o e m$ v� �� doom o E� E quo t E E m o; E-E a 9-� _ Yfp9 Cw V'= iV. *S1' m m 'QTY 7V�d Cm.W',_.. OOtj C.- .�VQW �y OlO �C=� yi GW �.. 'p QiOV O> O_OD ...d ��n. n uTn E o wv_ o L$m m o ma e'0.$�S5 E E rS S mmQ SaV�VO�.r3 Ce V $O y"- �pa... i -a M= damC6CvLt±d C�c�°� foCR cc p 06 GGV.O -m.•OO�0 C`04 L ° ��myVt�6�at971 p ICC Cy7779 G7 Lip $1.8 °�--p,.�a� ��yu >vaaYmet L ?�<cE °-wnyvou=�°a'"5°1o"m co�2mu0 o�=pETo° v oaPI-8 Em `o9 " moo ap o'-"mu`>.f2 ,°puho.3mE�L:.maE�oeo7"e°='ereis�a� cmc c `' Q vdz��nYaEe�mdia.Eiooa�$iye$o$mi°�gte$EE�gom�?>IE vF Q c >3ar �E ` �L" �. La oyam A/ ..12 'QpC�,a oo °° Ea o$�<�med�� L= w$dce ii �u b�,>cVVR t_EE c�..>Eaa� E1.:-0 a� m Uatm LJ.1 = - zam',,�ms s-aims m I�� • oO ma�op E mm?wd Craig �=b�_ 0ce Z �V I Zl � e o e" amp d. d po a O 8O"D my Is EE�cdo-pa mac.-ceioaEm F°u?i°4'`ev E N �o : `mariivcoi=� Zr.6 dEc °r Er«E >>_>o�oto O q` m41 m6 EgudEUNo e z 6 6 m C 6 m. V t 00 5o. m e� - o• -v, EA a. •o n 8 { IV • X _ 8 4-� m . St m 3 0. all u is Pow y m , ,z Bim ag� guco�m c d 3 a • f 3.pE'c o 0 tm�5 a� a�' u r •52, jaa m arx o q o rn^� d 333 E-L7�nai° �3 0 Ck _ - . 1V�11 'O ro p, 0�vv�� .o P•a r d r C d 7 N d mp O a • � A-8 I g 7g C-3 Uc W =W.�G'b tJ d ts :s E 'o y z odm3�v�� `o5lj Wm�.o id T� m o19 2 M,1.0 ��W 1 ^� the residents there try to [hear NnNUt6 FROM 1 their] TVs with a DC-10 flying overhead, and see what kind of re sp you get. I. grew up cause unless we work togefih- under aflight pattern. I know i, we have no political clout, what it's like.' ► nes said: `One little,city is not Manhattan Beach City Coun- mg::. .have` ari; impact on cilwoman Linda Wilson is ,her 's:"plans. But perhaps -all- of city's appointee to the South Bay ► c�i3es worKmg together- to; Cities Council of Governments onth`eir [til iapensron sup and chairwoman of the organi `tter3"ear All:,,have' , i ,... n zation s LAX subcommittee, :a which is studying the possible She �;arisi rhavea impacts of an expanded airport PPP P,"0 to' Based an the recommend_- jouater the recen't''efforts' of.Los tions of her .constituents, Wilson iigeles Mayos Richard Riordan;- has sent letters to U.S. Rep. Jane o has_been.., r otuig a.larg:_ Harman, state Assemblywoman LAX Y� :high level. meetings : Debra Bowen and Los Angeles 'Be -. mijing to Washington, D.C.' 'CountySupervisor Don Knabe ii,Ri9rdanzargues.thai it's ; critf- -all of whom represent resi- aI to eapano thgAirpoit's capac , dents living near the airport. to handle onhimore e trd as= ' ,., , . _ P The letters ask that a special angers from 60•million a year board of . elected officials and 95 on and dou- o about . community representatives from the amount of air cargo --, throughout the South Bay be om Z hMon %ns a year 1o.4. 2' appointed to-work more closely *ilhon:tons bY,the year 2015.; •. i with the Department of Airports t j Increasing the airport's capac- on design y a gn Flans for the LAX to handle .more passengers' expansion d freight }Mould.reaffihw-Los Two expansionscenarios now igeles` position as the intenaa on the table a third will be nal.gateway4:to-bid 'irom _the released in 60 to 90.days — call . 'aafictim,'said Deane Leaven- Mor. reconf' the ' ' ' ` arth 121ordaii's press deputy ' existin runways g amort s t " " g ys and adding at Another' part of ;this whole _east one runway to either the } expansion is Making sure' other, northwest or the southeast end ► es don't vii the ; .business, of the airport. ourism an jols;that come from F _ � Whichever scenario is eventu- providing su' & ac'cgss, - he said. • ally put forward by the Depart- =. Leavenworth said `one in 20 ment of Airports would be sub- lobs in-.the e1iv64count - region' 'ect to a le t J lengthy and envi- si=ou1iding..`,LAX ;.are : directly. rorimental review process -- a tied to':the airport; An expanded point Los Angeles CityCouncil- L'AX , is projected to :bring . an ,woman Ruth Galanter continues • additional-$3y.j.bitllion ,:from to impress upon her 230,000 con- jncreased. tourism.and trade. stituents: ,.... , and '367,000 more jobs to--the The ro region. ', ► ? P ]act's environmental impact report is expected to be "The'people are coming" Los released in . August,:. she said, ,'Angeles Department-of Airports The earliest the Los Angeles spokeswoman Cara Fossett said. City Council could vote on the "We- can be ready,for,them or issue would be in 1999. - not." .. .. "The biggest challenge I'm But Hawthorne Mayoi Larry - facing is trying to ` convince Guidi isn't biting ow the theory everyone that the deal is not yet that what's good for Los Angeles done,N Galanter said adding. is necessarily good for the South that she does not recall •another BaY issue that has pulled South Bay ."What people here need -.to cities and the city of Los Angeles realize is that'-a- lot of the busi- into a closer working 'relation- ness that will move in, such ' as ship. freight forwarders, will not be ? "I think what's newsworthy is beneficial to cities because they that the smaller cities have don't generate sales tax dollars," .always kind of viewed L.A. 'as �Guidi said. _"If you expand LAX, the 400-pound gorilla [on the `ypu're not going to attract high- ;airport issue], and a mean gorilla ,end retailers because who wants 'at that, she said. "Now they're to be under the flight pattern of a learning that the gorilla has _a 747t'.. -- - - !soft underbelly, and as they -learn more, [they] are surprised `to find out that there is a con- certed effort qoing on to fight it. SECTION - a L TUESDAY AUGUST 4.1998 METRO Supervi ors Seeka Voice 'ro date, aecmons aoouc expan- sion or development of airports n LAV PjanS have been made for the most part by the cities in which whey are-' located without consideratiotil ,)F control over airports in other citi* By SHARON BERNSTEIN or in unincorporated areas. TIMES STAFF WRITER That means Los Angeles has Saying that the proposed expan- been left to decide on its own what Sion of Los Angeles International kind of facilities to build, typically doing so without input from or Airport is "troubling," the county To far other municipalities. Board of Supervisors on Tuesday To begin addressing that demanded a voice in the city's T- ues- plans to enlarge the overcrowded day the supervisors decided Tues facility.. day to set up a countywide task force- The orce The board also urged the city.to But that would still not bind any develop a regional approach to city to participate in a regional plan anticipated growth in air traffic and it would not involve repre- that would siphon some activity sentatives of nearby counties, such from LAX to smaller airports. as Orange County, that might Logi- "L.A. city has turned a deaf :ear 'cally be included in one on the other 87 cities in L.A. "You can set up task forces until County about this," alleged county the cows come home, said Los Supervisor Mike Antonovich, who Angeles: City Councilwoman Ruth had asked the board to go even Galanter, who represents the area further and place a measure on the around LAK and opposes the cur - November ballot requiring that rent expansion plan. "The question regional airports be included in any is who is going to build what at expansion of LAX. their airports." The board declined to go that far, Galanter, who testified Tuesday but the supervisors voted unani- in favor of Antonovich's plan for a mously to oppose any expansion referendum, nonetheless wel- plan that includes only LAX itself. comed the supervisors` entrance "They've got to bring us to the into the discussion. table, said Supervisor Don Knabe, Los Angeles Mayor Richard whose district includes the airport Riordan, a staunch supporter of and small nearby cities and who LAX expansion, welcomed input introduced the motion to call for a from the county's task force but regional plan. "If not, I'm ready to would not comment on whether oppose this whole thing:" the county would be included in A regional approach, Knabe said, Lite city's panel overseeing the Proposal. said his spokeswoman, would include expanding not only Ncelia Rodriguez. Ontario and Palmdale airports, Rodriguez stressed that the which are owned by Los Angeles, mayor's vision includes increasing but perhaps Long Beach or a future traffic at Ontario and Palmdale airport at El Toro, in Orange airports. County, as well. 'LAX would be a key player, but But such ideas run' smack up it wouldn't be the only player in against a systemic problem likely the new system," Rodriguez said - to stymie efforts for a broad -rang- i "The bottom line is that for Los ing plan: There is no regional Angeles to remain competitive in regulatory body with responsibility the i 21st century, LAX has to for developing appropriate air traf - expand. But so do other airports in fie. the region." GAILY NE'NS /SUNDAY; APRIL 5. 1998 / NEWS Missed flights Traffic also 'isa reason why many people miss flights leaving LAX or have to sprint through the terminal to nuke the gate: On a recent Friday night, attorney Todd Chapman ran up to a Conti- nentai Airlines gate at LAX five Lto AX '' ^- 4 -Z .F - - r �'��^ could helpcut congestion. `Bute whether it sufficient, we will have. minutes. late for his flight Francisco. He said traffic was so bad ~ - '� , to see," he said. Airport engineers still are dis-' on the Harborand 105 freeways that ;.�. � � � ,�,, -= " , cussing the: plans with state trans-• he never thought he would get to the airport. on time. Fortunately for �. 1; � � � ; E portation officials, and details could; .. Chapman, the plane was till there. ''_`. '� be released in April or May, Depoian ted' "I give myself an hour and 15 r minutes to get here from �_ �,, _ Most of the expansion, project downtown," Chapman- said a he 1 '' would be paid for by the airlines, but, stood in line to check in. -.. the tate and federal ove g rnments; Asked if that was a -sufficient - _"_ would have to, oin with LAX to pay' ' for , the road and transit work;. amount of time, he replied, "Often, Depoian said. Other possible:sources it's not." Then he walked into a bar - include the Metropolitan; for a beer after learning his flight was ' Transportation Authority, the city delayed at least two hours due to a!� „. • Transportation Department and the: mechanical problem. l: -s Southern California Associatiotr.of Most airlines do not keep records - - ,, _ - - — Governments of why passengers show up late, but officials say backed -up streets and freeways are a common excuse. _ - Traffic experts Weigh in "It's not necessarily an everyday experience, but our employees who.r; = The governments association, -work out at the gate area say cus- - `� - �" ^ looking at the regional issues, has endorsed adding a lane in each. Comers do mention the traffic as a ., - - direction on the 405 between Rose - reason why they are late to a flight or as a reason why they missed a .- a _ -. trans and the 10.1. Car-pool and flight," Southwest Airlines spokes -Mich el Owen El", aiy News regular lanes are planned within woman Kirsten Kendrick said. : A sea of brake lights on the southtaound 405 Freeway in West Los Angeles illustrates the congestion problem. sev y Last week, Pinzler, the expansion According to an airport study, 'LAX opponent from Redondo Beach who - -bound motorists heading south on the 405 accounted for Congestion -busting mini -freeway, with entrance and is a member of SCAG's aviation about 4 percent of traffic in the The cornerstone ofthetrafficplan exit cps at points not yet deter- subcommittee, persuaded his col-; leagues on thepanel to passmotion Sepulveda Pass. That figure rises to to deal with the anticipated annual mined; Depoian said- ,a opposing new construction at LAX.! 7 percent at La Tijera Boulevard passenger increase from 60 million Other projects under consider- The association staff supports the. and 10 percent at Century today to 100 million in 17 years is ation are: . Boulevard. the beltway, or road encircling the ■ More czar -pool and regular expansion. iTransportation and Com - South of LAX, airport traffic on 3,500 -acre property. traffic lanes on the 405. municaTrans Committee is expected the northbound 405 accounts for Officials say it would route cars, ■ An elevated car-pool lane over to vote On the measure Thursday, l 6 percent of the traffic at Rose. vans and cabs to near and existing Century Boulevard for direct access and the fon the ensureG board will debate trans Boulevard and 10 percent at terminals and take traffic off' Local to LAX from the 405. the issue April 16. .9 Century Boulevard- During rush hour on a typical streets. ■ Modification of the 105 Th "e only reason you'd want to be Freeway's Imperial Boulevard exits Pinzl doesn't believe the traffic afternoon, 18,229 motorists use the on it is ifyou're going to the airport," to separate airport traffic from other 'vehicles. situation can resolved :enough it ion.' He said now it allow an expansion. 405 between Century and La Tijera boulevards, of which 573 are going said Phil Depbian, the airport's assistant executive director. ■ Anew airport exit on the 405 at takes 30 to minutes to go from; to or from LAX. By 2020, the Preliminary designs show the Arbor Vitae Street, just north of ard to the airport via '��m Boulevard Sepulveda when it should take 10 to number could rise to 23,176, with road involving Westchester Park Century Boulevard. Arbor Vitae 15 minutes. With the expansion and LAX accounting for 1,457 vehicle way on the north, Pershing Drive on runs into Westchester Parkway, only some road improvements, trips. the west, Imperial Boulevard and which is art of the proposed P p ring Pinzier fears that ride could take 45, On - the 405 south of the 105' the 105 on the south, and the 405 on mad. gimes' ' Freeway, there are 21,093 motorists the east. Alterations to that, ■ Extension of the Green Line it s going to make it so that the. during peak hours on a typical day, including a shortcut near or light rail onto airport property. only way you are going to be able to ofwhich 2,545 are tied to LAX. And including Sepulveda Boulevard, are Tim Merwin,:an aviation expert move a cards with a crane —pick it by 2020, the number could jump to possible: for the Southem California Assoc said d move it out of the road," he 25,643, of which 4,075 are Connectors would be erected to -ation -of Governments, said the link the existing roads into a LAX plans for road improvements E m '. O y ^' ►. d .M O Z5 a p b a m m y� >, o ,, cn b e a ►, 67 3 d o c A N O C ai c9 ,= .aC M ... a > a L cR ,.vw ..00 3 H V O 07 p � 4f3 Y ••• C. N _R E, � a; c o A� L 66 o c 3. X 3 0 G W r: o eO n,C a R >,y w,� a.=•> y'C-� x c_,, A�`3 � N 3 3:4 ;, N � as �� v o mba e o cc�h " .. O _ so S ca c 50 a v O to '0. O O C axi oa ,p R H O .."v a.4U cb� p e a �, o d a �X c 2 d >,: b v'G.c y c A nr O. op t. O of y> 0 W a d C Q t c, m O � TO�! 0 c a... a ra �- ca >, a c 3 E Ela S o c.. ^b A,= A c r� U • Ha.� tin r 7 r •- Ncwo6O� 5i'vA aerv3��y�O/�' �; ' O W a a G. O G '0 O. G a G C w O"� =� ip C X cu L C nc3 av ao °v Xm'd oa. ..e,�3,.pyo O ? ..,.^ di a .O .� >,7 a as o - r b o-Q'3� N a� ° >,o� a,o- o ,m „ac �< > c O �Db a �" O �- CO. C s y R e , c C- = O O+ E 'ep O= O d a ev a a X a s oA • r� o a 3= a, 'y°s°f. d o ^aO o A a y 3 w ca^o T c p r 'R CE > o:S 0 ' o'c 3 =�'� �b a�a �acn m 3 '�o�ab°as0Ra0-,z a ,C., •d� �.V �as ��O�O c �c •�= cc O ON > VOoC •p aw =•� E M t'eO� a =yo .5 c E E `o.c.� a fl R E „a a ^• to c A ,t5 y..,� > �a W b' d y ti N .� ca N •"3. O O °> bo" a i.^,. Y Ci a •C ^ O V) a r S weg mo c .. o.5 c.aa O_p a �' �Q� o o,ca E c.- ■ .° N 00 ° d 'a �» N c e �, o E .° . . L:6 oo N i' c o E oO 8 ■�� ` N�Nv°:c°R�� a�p'�Z O O ba. X O u 0 O lC6 mm X eta .0 d R ,� O ,� u a v C a a a w 7 W F "CS a a O V O s. �+ C .. w �: W.. C 'cp-..� N >.. � C [r] u �.: .'_. •� + G a_ 7 >' to 'C G d a ea O •O co C v� of to .0 c u s O O L > a p N eO a U 3 a+ c m roLJ J O to .a E., ,: E ..+ R 10 �, _. �, ,�. w •`r..Y•. _a 6J '.7 V R C y �. 4Ei O O a a A p C O'u C E.>rG a G G a O • TEO( •:S -0 3 S ,. 3 O u N m ua a m 6> s, o C] -o ». cc E r E r, a a� c R aa5 y °'>s o c :; e6 ¢c °0 3 / h c y R o -O 0. p iLS nxi O C G4 R c ca C G S]. b ca ,,, H X a C3.� R N> .. G. O a a p �, .., ,^ O C a, 3 v 0 x •a ..„ E E a 6l O' La, ��R C ti a a v a) 7,9 �„ -� S •� m H C- O ... %c QE.� .» a' C .,, o w. G u C v u t d ".a C : a R 6 .. ni G. N^ .m p Lr�.. ' ....�'� a y ayyy O o. V a .., .. v a G.'ai 7 7 c H o t v c a d o o a c R 'o 0 W.. M D E N �'a �.a.O'+.� am.�LU s..� m bo �_ ,� = N t •a. a vi . kZ C66. T ca O Y O.. (J ,a p i a Dq 7 C ay.. r. .0 a V ... X a .4 O N O L 'c...� y. Or .O - C R G. a `•' •+� 'a •^ L O c cc �m'' °�' c O a,u eca C c - R d N @ E� � a`�, ? c am 'o c� E s c ^o. 3� c� a V a^ N c ea.� o c'E �vs o= 00E �, Ey'LH°�a�sY�HoL:6 3o�3 ,�'=sabO „3' Q •� u'.. O 60 a C •b a •O V. ,p m C f•"' cc O. •C !n O •� L i C... r .r w N N a ra G 1S. :OC N >,. a a >. �. t �` vyi C.1 C 3 G q>, > 3 m vU...S.E '"ea3.T`a o oU c a.'6Oc oZs m C f S€e ogsecy a`3� �o ms' S _E2�8« S��Q' ,—Es 39:�q$ ¢dug E'�3e s�Zy�+ E5 'o .. w E Tex C � 9 Z 3' '✓S Fa w e -� � as a S.� d e o. m re p�{"E 'o ivc^yam E oO g. n�Y < ' 7. �e.� etg�� tb i=0x '�°a uii> 3. �:'$^1. i'es-'25 .� R C r� g p l�Jrw 33 ��€rz ��wYS�$ C r _ � � js t+ ';' w > Y arm i r� � �v $c o z u a w r P A. `ire �,dE 5 _ esj aY�-9i E e: L' w u v E �5 a >.. c Ly'Q5 t w$ uQ iJC' ,g CG J• 5 p c m _ Cr �iY[gLr4jrCa�iw. YC•_��YrY :uYy OO C$J a O n $��> s Y`u„te%y „fie ■um urf7F N �3E�”-=v��'>Dw�,9 �'n.L ;'--eEE:�.'o.�.JSy C"qr-L�+!^tETe`��'S.ue"J•°`.+'no.E -. 'erD�vc�p'�owr Re uy�?aarcpyg c 8��? 03 c3 m�E rrc��OP�n QQ6Ec$ <3g�25�•mu1�"C��gg�y�f od < M i3 s: J: y S u: � L 9 � g o f $r v a 9=.R. u9- �! � �`'$� gg !t $�: ��u�•S ��e: caa^'.c� cum n- �a C ED c Ew g c ."...�'_b' H fJ s. ->C o i.. ,a $ c n c u o c m c E 4 .CY V 'S Lim C_9'Eu 60 EY.w �o i r Y O loi u$ e Z oa E 9r n <a. u c� xd Er' Qq5o�e e$e °Eu e�g`.uYE r r' _ v� cin Y34 '..uJ�i. $3r=``'c ma Y..0 p ..i >_ ^ w rWX5�d Q s c :E 7 E Yo$a v w C t L L ^tea 000 � o to E t a. S A S �. V C = T D G OG u uE 'n uu u = Y 5 a-- '�„ V_ Q W ��L 7`.GV r-2Ew �- -E A70yV ZY.�O gOOq.Hu � V C n C Y` O. T9 r 7 r l2 Je G E C W H p O w 'Q W CJ O N s a,� av : S S-1 eoo a. o r �'ew Yo^eo5t a °° � `c SE �- 3 no 3r �.«nu.ti o�+'E �cYic ❑� oE� Q bD i]. � 4, < = s • .i .F . E m u � w v u ^ :3 u .; L E >� \o, o .. �.:� VIA .c. N Q u u O5;Tcm _ o_Yuu a$�. >��^LyEo mYY��o �_ Gl •�..i � Z �. a`. ` V V 4 9 ... q V L_ 'q O C Y O �. � C C �•�. �. C�'�';�Z c?c p'.0 �� yo t.E cn�:�ie -e�o.e d`�no Aomra °c'. • N:.. O rJ ' 'S' T O C >: L V m V O Y D• O v m. G .. r ii. >. I . �r+ K J-1 G. C >� 'O O G ... C Y J E G O r+r 94 C> omi i.Lw w m« -35-p 4 -o 04c^ ° :t'� a w., �ecuv'gqe3� =L Qa h=>, k •'�Y r.A��Eoo�Y '.7.. V N.JYr N $S1 enov`a �E Et 6! a.2 =ry we -ws u a.mD^ mJ c eu'w 3 " or ao '4V.} .ccC ..a u& �s u7.. au ,u E -g Y<C c ,m. w9'g.. u n u e:'� n � n • a, C: O' -Bi C$:...,7^ =mmo c±wo'o9 Ec �..� ^srgw.J�'.goc�Yq��n,n�ococuc-�Qy��E_�. C _ V Q \. u 5- 5:E mQ c m7 C. u n C G. �o c v-. \" GJ L Q.' c u �- 9. �. o n '3 - c 4 D c uta -L" uE•v C >>m ^ _ gC m - r 9 G 9EE .EF n< n�'c o.. d3�o '`o nN.. >.�'a vo 3'. vN.2 f r 1. Adelanto 2. Alhambra 3. Apple Valley 4. ` Banning - 5. Barstow 6.: Beaumont 7. Bell 8. _Bell Gardens 9. 'Bellflower 10. Big Bear Lake 11. Blythe 12. Calimesa 13. Canyon Lake 14. Carson 15. Cathedral City 1,6. Chino 17. Chino Hills 18. Coachella 19. Colton 20. Corona 21. Covina 22. Cudahy 23. Culver City 24. Desert Hot Springs 25. Downey 26. EI Segundo 27. Fontana 28. Garden Grove 29. Gardena 30. Grand Terrace 31. Hawthorne 32. Hemet 33. Hermosa Beach 34. Hesperia 35. Highland 36. Huntington Park 37. Indian Wells COALITION ROSTER 38. Indio 39. Inglewood 40. Lake Elsinore 41. Lawndale 42. Loma Linda 43. Lomita 44. Los Angeles County 45. Manhattan Beach 46. Montclair 47. Monterey Park 48. Moreno Valley 49. Murietta 50. Needles 51. Norco 52. Palm Desert 53. Palm Springs 54. Palos Verdes Estates 55. Perris 56. Rancho Cucamonga 57. Rancho Mirage 58. Rancho Palos Verdes 59. Redlands 60. Redondo Beach 61. Rialto 62. Riverside 63. Riverside County 64. Rosemead 65. San Bemardino 66. San Bernardino County 67. San Jacinto 68. Santa Monica 69. South Gate 70. Temecula 71. Torrance 72. Twentynine Palms 73. Upland 74. Victorviile Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 75. West Hollywood 76. Whittier 77. Yucaipa 78. Yucca Valley 79. Alliance fora Regional Solution to Airport Congestion (ARSAC) 80. Coachella Valley Assoc. of Governments 81. Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) 82. EI Segundo UnifiedSchool District 83. Inglewood Unified School District 84. Inland Valley Development Authority 85. LAX Expansion No! (LAXEN) 86. Lennox School 'District 87. Manhattan Beach School District 88. March Airport Joint Powers Authority 89. P.A.N.I.C. 90. Redondo Beach School District 91. Riverside County Transportation Commission 92. San Bernardino County Association of Governments 93. San Bernardino International Airport Joint Powers Authority 94. Southern Califomia Cities Joint Powers Consortium . 95. Southern Califomia Logistics Airport 96. Western Riverside Council of Governments 97. Westside Civic Federation 98. Wiseburn Unified School District Revised 10/12/00 Coalition M •� Airport Plan Why Do`We'Need to Expand Airports At All? Regional Growth The current debate over expanding airport capacity is driven by projections for growth in demand for air commerce in Southern California over the next twenty years. New airport demand is largely a product of the -projected 40% growth in population and even greater increases in employment in Southern California over that period. More new people more gainfully employed in Southern California means more people wanting to fly. It means more businesses engaged in commercialactivityrequiring commercial passenger and cargo services. It means more demand for goods from other countries, particularly Pacific Rim countries; perhaps, when the Asian economic crisis is over, there may be more demand for our goods as well. The result - increased demand for commercial flights, both passenger and cargo. We believe that an expanding; air commerce marketplace can be good for our economies and good for our communities.' The real issue remains. How do we best meet this new demand for commercial air services? By expanding LAX, as proposed or by making better use of the many other commercial airports in Southern' California? Key Issues In This Discussion • Where will growth in Southern California occur over the next twenty years? Are there airport resources located nearer these centers of growth that can more fairly capture the new air travel demand with fewer environmental' burdens and at a lower cost than endeavoring to capture most of this new demand at LAX? Contact; Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (3f0) 899-6767 Pagel Subregion % increase Expected Expected % increase Gateway Cities in pop. total pop. in in South Bay Cities: population increase 2020 employment North LA County:" 169% 762,000 1,213,000 199% Riverside County 519,100 3,547,200 105% 1,439,100 2,815,800 148% San Bernardino County 82% 1,271,700 2,830,000 127% Total Growth in Areas Most Remote from LAX 102% 3,472,800 6,858,800 As Projected in SCAG RTP RegionalGrowth is Slowest Nearest LAX. Subregion % increase in population Expected pop. increase Expected total pop. in 2020 %' increase in employment Gateway Cities 19%° 386,500 2,368,600 40% South Bay Cities: 13% 106,600 925,600 36% Westside Cities: 11% 26,000 253,000 20% Total Growth in Areas Nearest LAX 519,100 3,547,200 w Areas of Southern California Once Thought of as Rural Will Soon be Very Urban It does not make sense to centralize our airport facilities at LAX while the population of Southern California becomes increasingly decentralized? We should remember that we are not planning our airports to meet today's needs; rather, we are planning for the growth expected in the next twenty ears.Areas of Southern California which may seem remote and less developed now will become very urban during that time. Yet, the unfortunate truth is: Until now, with the convening of the SCAG Aviation Subcommittee, there, wasn't even .a process to develop such a plan. Nevertheless, the local communities where these' airports operate are energetically' pursuing their own plans to develop their "airports, in most cases with strong local political support and little opposition. Consider: In twenty years, the population in the Inland Empire - including the Coachella Valley - grows to nearly 6 million people. it will become one of the great urban areas .of the nation. More people will live and work there than in the City of Los Angeles. This region has several existing airports to serve its needs, including March, Norton, George, Palm Springs, and Ontario airports. These airports need regional support pport to gain the `resources They need for development in order to give them a fair share of the air commerce and marketplace. Contact: Dennis Zane. Urban Dimensions (M) 899-6767 Page 3 t , Coalition for a Truly Regional • * •, Consider: In twenty years, the population of North Los Angeles County, including Santa Clarita, Palmdale and Lancaster, is expected to nearly triple. It will become an urban area of over one million people Palmdale Airport will be far closer to these population centers than LAX or even Burbank. This airport can serve passengers and cargo needs of the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley as well. High speed rail, should it occur and connect to Palmdale Airport will clearly expand' their potential marketplace. Consider: Even Orange County needs its own regional and international airport service. While its population will grow more slowly than other parts of the region, Orange County's employment base is expected to grow, by nearly 70%. Airport planners see the growth in air traffic emanating from Orange County to be particularly significant. It makes no 'sense for Orange County residents and businesses to continue to seek their air commerce services at LAX, adding unnecessarily to the burdens experienced by LAX neighbors, when they could better be served in their own backyard. Southern California Needs A Truly Regional Airport Plan Contact: Dennis tone: Urban Dimensions (310) 89-9-6767 Page 4 ..,,,,._-.c .. _._:.�_. ..lw•�.,��. �t-��.,e�.-=.�:,-�,�-�..,-t.�.,.u,.�.n�.�«.,..�.4_ .._sem--a...�,._�m..�.,w �,..,._...,-�, s RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WHEREAS: The Los Angeles Department of Airports has initiated a revision of the Master Plan for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which anticipates expanding its passenger activity from a current 60 million passengers per year to an expected 92 million passengers per year and its cargo activity from its current 1.8 million tons per year to an expected 4.2 million tons per year; and, WHEREAS: Expanding LAX's passenger and cargo activity as proposed will greatly increase the number of flights and nearly double ground traffic going to and from LAX; and, WHEREAS: Communities in the vicinity of LAX which already experience enormous adverse environmental impacts from the operations of the airport can expect greatly increased noise and air pollution from overhead aircraft, and greatly increased congestion and air pollution from ground traffic, especially from dramatic increases in the activity of diesel trucks around the airport; and, WHEREAS: Airport officials estimate the LAX improvements will cost as much as $12' billion, not including the costs of transportation improvements required to facilitate access to LAX °which will be paid for by regional tax payers; and, WHEREAS: There are many other commercial airports in Southern California, some, with significant histories as commercial airports, and some recently converted to commercial or joint military and commercial airports; and, WHEREAS: Several of these airports are located in areas of Southern California expected to experience the greatest growth in population and employment over the next twenty years, while LAX is nearest to communities expected to experience the least growth in the same period; and, WHEREAS: Developing airport capacity near high growth communities rather than concentrating airport development at LAX may be an environmentally superior, lower-cost and more equitable strategy for serving future growth in air commerce in Southern California; and, WHEREAS: The development of these regional airport resources will help spread jobs and economic development opportunities more equitably throughout the region, and reduce the public health and environmental burdens on communities near LAX. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: The [NAME OF CITY] calls upon The communities of Southern California, including the City of Los Angeles; the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Sam Bernardino, Riverside, and Ventura; the State of California; and our congressional representatives to join together in developing a Regional Airport Plan for Southern California that constrains LAX to operate within the capacity of its existing facilities and develops the capacity of the many other commercial airports in Southern California to serve the expanding air commerce marketplace. The Coalition for a Truly Regional Airport Plan, organized primarily by the efforts of the City of El Segundo, unites over 95 cities, counties, transportation agencies, and school districts in a call for a truly regional airport system that utilizes the capacity of ten other commercial airports in Southern California rather than concentrating the growth in air commerce at LAX. The Problem: Southern California can expect a 40% growth in population and a doubling of air commerce activity over the next twenty years. Officials at LAX propose to capture the lion's share of that growth by expanding LAX from its current 61 million passengers per year to over 92 million passengers per year and more than doubling its cargo activity. However, the growth in Southern California wilFprimarily occur in communities in the Inland Empire Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, North Los Angeles County, and Orange County - all remote from LAX. These communities want to develop their own airports, airports that already exist, to help build their economies to meet the needs of this growing population. Communities near LAX do not want to bear the excessive and unfair burden of an expanding LAX, when far better alternatives exist. The Environmental Burden: Communities surrounding LAX and those under its flight path suffer the burdens from an already overbuilt airport. Excessive aircraft noise, pollution from air operations and autos, and traffic congestion continually plague our communities and our schools. • Approximately 31,335 residential units and 36 schools around LAX fall within in the 65 decibel Community Noise EquivalentLevel,; a noise standard defined by the State of California. Properties within this high -noise contour experience the full impact of the jets that take off or land every 35 seconds at LAX. • LAX is the largest source of NOx emissions in Southern California unleashing 3.5 times the NOx generated by all Los Angeles County MTA buses combined. NOx is a major contributor to the formation of ozone. • Southern California's freeways and boulevards already suffer from almost constant gridlock. A substantial number of annual vehicle trips result from funneling the region's air commerce into LAX. The Southern California Association of Governments, our only regional planning authority, estimates that stretches of the 405 Freeway will have average congested speeds reduced from the current 12-23 miles per hour to 10-16 miles per hour in the next 20 years. Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page 1 The Coalition: The Coalition now consists of over 95 cities, counties, transportation agencies and other entities. These communities and agencies collaborate in pressing for a fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of air commerce in Southern California. They are united by the principle that each county in Southern California has both the right and the responsibiliy torp ovide amort facilities to meet its own needs and to capture a fair share of regional air commerce. The Coalition unites: • the cities in the South Bay and on the Westside, cities in the "LAX impact zone." These communities oppose the proposed expansion of LAX because of concerns over excess noise, congestion, air pollution and reduced safety in overcrowded skies_ • more than 48 cities, counties and agencies of both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. These communities expect.their population to nearly double over the next twenty years, roughly half the growth expected for the entire Southern California region. They have airports of their own — Ontario, March, Norton, and George --'that they wish to develop to help provide for the economic needs of this growing population. • a growing number of communities from the interior of Los Angeles County, like Monterey Park, Rosemead, Bellflower, Whittier, Huntington Park, Bell, etc., are joining the coalition because they are anxious to avoid increased overhead flights, additional congestion, and the doss of regional. transportation dollars to mitigate an overcrowded LAX. The Regional Plan: The Coalition is united in support of a plan that constrains LAX to the capacity of its existing facilities and distributes the new growth in air commerce to the airports already operating in the high growth areas of Southern California. In such a regional system: • LAX could still grow from its current 61 million passengers to approximately 70 million passengers per year; • El Toro should capture up to 28 million passengers per year from the -rapidly growing Orange County market, as proposed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors; • Ontario Airport could grow from its current 6 million passengers per year to approximately 20-30 million passengers per year; and, • Other regional airports, such as Burbank, John Wayne, Palmdale, Long Beach, Norton, Palm Springs could serve niche markets as short and medium haul airports, just as Burbank and John Wayne Airports do today; or could serve the region as • Cargo -only airports, such as proposed by March and George airports, reflecting the increasing tendencies in the cargo industry to rely on dedicated freighter aircraft. Such a plan would provide comparable economic benefit to Southern California compared to expanding LAX at far less cost, with far less environmental burden, and far greater fairness. Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page 2 Coalition o' Truly Regional Airport Frequently Asked Questions about LAX and Regional Airports 1. How much expansion does LAX want? • LAX currently services approximately 62 Million passengers per year (MAP) and 2.1 million tons of cargo per year. They propose to expand their capacity to service 92 million passengers per year and 4.2 million tons of cargo. (92 Map represents about 60% of the regional air, passenger activity anticipated for the year 2020.) Currently, LAX handles over 2000 flights per day; if they expand as proposed the airport was projected handle more than 3,000 flights per day. • Lately, LAX officials have begun to say that over the next twenty years air carriers will change their fleet mix to rely upon super jumbo aircraft that carry more passengers and that LAX intends to divert alarge number of commuter and business jet activity to other nearby airports. Doing so will allow LAX to serve more than 90 million passengers and beep the number of operations to current levels. • However, this projected outcome relies heavily upon unforseeable and improbable developments. Projecting the fleet mix of air carriers twenty years from now is nothing short, of "fleet -mix voodoo." In addition, LAX staff acknowledge they have no authority to divert any commuter flights to other airports. Most of these commuter flights are flying to LAX to connect with flights there and will have little reason to cooperate with this diversion. (Besides, these same changes in fleet mix will mean that an LAX constrained to current footprint will have dramatic reductions in flights — and neighboring communities would get some relief.) • In any event, these growth projections need to be treated with some degree of skepticism. When the last Master Plan was approved for the current LAX, it was supposed to be capable of handling merely 40 million passengers per year. LAX now exceeds that by a factor of 50%, and can handle more than 70 million according to LAX officials, • This enormous increase in activity at LAX, obviously, has profound implications for the rest of the "LAX Impact Zone". 2. Why does the City of El Segundo and other communities near the airport oppose the expansion of LAX? • The proposed expansion of LAX is the wrong answer to the right question. How should Southern California capture the growing opportunity in air commerce in the 21" Century? ,' We believe that the best way to answer this question is by developing a regional plan to better use the eleven other. commercial airports in Southern California. Many of these operate in the areas of Southern California expected to have the highest population and employment growth. • The concerns of the cities near LAX are straightforward and reasonable. The proposed expansion of LAX Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page l N will mean dramatically worsening traffic congestion (especially in Iight of othernewdevelopment proposed for the region, such as Playa Vista), far greater air pollution, more excessive airport noise, and increasing air safety risks. • Concentrating our airport facilities at LAX remote from where the eatest new rowth in population and jobs will occur only ensures unnecessary congestion. • Projections of the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) makes it clear that the region faces absolutely daunting congestion problems over the next twenty years. In the time frame of the expansion plan, stretches of the I-405 near LAX are expected to have an average congested speed of 16-23 mph reduced to 10-16 mph. It makes no sense to exacerbate this congestion by: concentrating our air traffic at LAX when the growth in the region is in the Inland Empire, North Los Angeles and Orange Counties. • The expansion will significantly increase air pollution and traffic congestion in communities around .LAX. - - In addition to doubling automobile traffic, expanding LAX as proposed may more than double diesel truck traffic around the airport. • LAX is already the region's single largest source of NOx emissions the primary precursor to ozone, greater than the next three largest sources combined, oil refineries and a power plant; 3 %2 times the NOx generated by all MTA buses. • The California Air Resources Board has determined that diesel exhaust particulates are a toxic air contaminant, responsible for thousands of lung cancer cases among Californians. Air pollution in the LA region has been associated with diminishing the lung capacity of youth by as much as 15%. • Expanding LAX as proposed will dramatically increase the noise burdens on surrounding communities. For El Segundo this noise comes from takeoffs and from "fly arounds" that will increase substantially as the air space ` becomes more crowded. • Overcrowding in our air corridors reduces the margin of error in the air traffic system and increases the likelihood of air disasters. 3. You say that expanding LAX isn't safe, isn't fair, isn't prudent, and isn't necessary. What 'do you mean? Is it safe? There are very significant concerns about air safety, congestion, air pollution and other environmental impacts that compromise the safety and public health of our community and other communities. Is it fair? A disproportionate share of theseburdens are born by a small' number of communities in the "LAX impact zone." In addition to El Segundo and other South Bay communities, these impacts are born by several low-income and minority communities under the flight path of the airport. Further, the proposed expansion of LAX will unfairly deny other communities in the region a full opportunity to develop their own airport and economic resources: Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page 2 Is itrodent? F El Segundo has concerns over the excessive costs of the proposed expansion of LAX. Other airport resources in the region can be developed at afar lower cost, since they will not require building new or "moving" runways as does LAX. Is it necessary? The capacity exists for capturing the anticipated growth in our regional air traffic at the multiple airports in Southern California that are suitable for commercial airport use. Properly using these airport resources, located in the high growth regions of Southern California, will make it unnecessary to expand LAX. 4. Assuming the increased environmental burdens you suggest, isn't the contribution to the local and regional economy too great to pass up? • Not when comparable benefits can be had and the burdens largely avoided by utilizing airports closer to where the new markets for air traffic will be developing, in the high growth regions of Southern California like Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange Counties as well as North Los Angeles county, 5. >El Segundo is not under the take -off or landing flight paths.' Why is it so concerned about LAX? The burdens of airport noise do not occur solely for communities under the flight path. For El Segundo, our noise problems come from nearby takeoffs and as a result of "fly Grounds ma de whileaircraft are queuing for landing. 0 In addition, the impacts of traffic congestion and air pollution will be very severe for E1 Segundo. 6. Isn't this just a case of middle class NIMBYism? Won't communities elsewhere in the region experience lots of job benefits? •- No. These environmental burdens are both excessive and unnecessary. It issimply good sense to use the regional resources that yield the fewest burdens, as well as the fairest distribution of benefits and burdens. 7. El Segundo is talking to other communities to gain their support. How is this effort going? •. Very well. As of today 77 cities and counties have joined us and adopted a version of our resolution calling for a regional airport plan and limiting growth at LAX — nearly 100 entities; if you include transportation agencies and school districts, etc. Those include virtually all communities of the South Bay, Westside, and communities from the San Gabriel Valley, Southeast Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The list continues to grow. 8. Isn't some expansion of LAX justified? Do you oppose any expansion whatsoever? + LAX officials have said in their original Notice of Preparation that if they were constrained to existing facilities they would expect to grow to 70 million passengers per year. (Now they, say 78 million passengers.) That is, even if the Master Plan is not approved as proposed, they say activity at LAX would likely grow by 20-30%. Residents of El Segundo would not be happy with that, and we do not support this growth. But if we choose to oppose this growth we wouldhave to do so through the FAA, or some other means, since it is independent of the Master Plan that we are now opposing. 9. Isn't the expansion of LAX necessary if we are to have a competitive economy in the 21st century? • A case can be made that capturing all or a significant share of the potential growth in air commerce is important to the regional economy. However, we believe that this growth can and should be captured by making 'better Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899'6767 Page 3 t use of the eleven other commercial airports in Southern California, rather than by expanding LAX. • We believe that utilizing these other regional airports would provide comparable regional benefits, be far less environmentally impactful, would produce far less congestion, would cost far less, and would provide a much fairer distribution of burdens and benefits. 10. What makes you think that the development of a regional airport plan is possible? • The system we envision includes major connecting airports in the Inland Empire at Ontario Airport, in Orange County at El Toro, and in Los Angeles County at LAX. Other airportsin each of these three areas would serve the short and medium haul point-to-point markets much like Burbank does today or serve as primarily cargo airports as March and George propose. Such a system provides each county with a system that meets its own needs and reflects the growth expected in the next twenty years. • Most of the eleven other commercial airports in Southern California are poised for significant growth and development. Many operate in communities expected to ,experience dramatic growth over the next two decades, growth that will ensure a strong market for local airport services. These airports have built appropriate local management capability and are marketing themselves to airline operators. All have existing runway systems and can avoid the enormous expense that expanding LAX would entail. • These airports are ready to grow. However, consistently these airports hear the sante refrain from potential operators: the operators want to see what will happen with the proposed expansion of LAX. As long as LAX is potentially expanding, the opportunity for other regional airports is limited. 11. Won't these other airports get tied -up by local political opposition, just as you're doing to LAX? ■ Some airports have a history of local political resistance, especially those in built out urban environments,: like LAX, Long Beach, Burbank, and John Wayne. However, airports in the less built out areas, like the Inland Empire, can operate with little impact on residential areas. These communities can plan their airports and their = overall development to avoid future collisions with neighbors. As a result, these airports now experience strong local community support. They are seen by their communities as opportunities for economic development and a chance to become full partners in the regional economy. 12. The majority of the population and employment growth in the region is expected to occur in the Inland Empire and North Los Angeles County overthenext twenty years. However, LAX officials say that the population with the "high propensity to fly" will grow mostly near LAX, and thus the proposed expansion is justified. How do you respond? LAX likes to say that 50%e of all origins and destinations in Southern California are centered within a 20 mile radius of LAX and will still be so after the build out of the proposed Masterplan. We say, fine' LAX can have that 50%; it is the other 50% that concerns us. A large share of those passengers can be served by other airports. • What we do know is that the primary market of LAX (about a 20 mile radius) will experience about one-fourth of Southern California's population` and job growth, yet LAX proposes to capture more than half the new growth in regional air commerce. • By contrast, the airports in the subregions of the Inland Empire and North Los Angeles County will experience more than half of the region's population and job growth. Based on the SCAG adopted RTF these regions will capture only 1'5% of the new growth in regional air commerce. (Not coincidentally, most of that new air commerce will be captured at Ontario Airport, an airport also owned by the City of Los Angeles.) Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page 4 13. Some say that Palmdale Airport is the major alternative to expanding LAX. Others say Palmdale Airport simply cannot meet the needs of the 21" Century. What do you think about Palmdale Airport as an alternative? • Palmdale Airport has an important role to play meeting the needs of a growing population and a growing economy in the North Los Angeles County and North San Fernando Valley region. However, Palmdale Airport is likely to play a role comparable to that played by Burbank Airport now. It can be a contributor in an overall system, but not the major alternative to LAX. 14. LAX officials say they are ready to support a regional pian that would include new airports at El Toro, expanding Ontario Airport, and perhaps building out Palmdale Airport. Nevertheless, they say, expanding LAX as proposed will be necessary. What do you say? • Officials at LAX tend to reduce a regional plan to those airports they own and, recently, El Toro. Yet, there are eight other commercial airports in the region. We see no reason to deny these regional airports a role in the marketplace and the economic opportunity to the communities- they serve. Rather, if we responsibly distribute the air traffic in the region, expansion of LAX would be unnecessary. • During the recent debate over the Regional Transportation Plan, the SLAG Aviation Subcommittee asked its staff to do a run of the computer model that SCAG employs which assumed constraining LAX to its existing facilities. How would air traffic be distributed in the region? Under that scenario, LAX officials said the their airport would likely increase its activity to 70 million passengers per year, a nearly 20% growth. While that is not a level of activity at LAX that El Segundo supports, this model does demonstrate that the rest of the projected growth in air travel demand can be distributed to other airports in the region.. The aggregate demand approximated the medium level projections, indicating little or no loss of air commerce outside the region. 15; There is strong opposition to El Toro Airport in Orange County. if El Toro is blocked, won't it be necessary to expand LAX? • Measure F, recently approved by Orange County voters, does not send a clear signal about El Toro at all. The measure was crafted to include concerns about prisons, toxic dump sites, as well as airports. Previously, El Toro Airport has been approved by the Orange County Board of Supervisors three times and by Orange County voters twice. However, if El Toro is not built, it will mean little for the approval of LAX. Opposition to El Toro is no more committed and no more vigorous than opposition to the expansion of LAX. We see no reason why communities around LAX should bear the burden of Orange County need for air commerce. in addition, SCAG computer modeling projects that Inland Empire Airports could capture El Toro's share, if necessary, and without economic loss to the region. 17. What is the role of SCAG and the RTP in all of this? • SCAG plays a very important role. Federal law has designated SCAG as the entity that must approve a Regional Transportation Plan. The RTP identifies projects eligible for federal dollars. If LAX is constrained in the RTP,' it will be difficult for larger project to be financed. In addition, the SCAG Regional Council vote on the RTP is the closest thing we now have to a regional vote on LAX or a regional airport plan. 18. LAX proponents say that air cargo is carried primarily in the belly of passenger aircraft rather than on cargo only air carriers. They say that the region's cargo facilities should therefore be located near to the centers of passenger activity, rather than in single purpose airports in the Inland Empire? How do you respond? • SCAG has produced a recent study that indicates that more than 60% of the cargo in the region now arrives in Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page, 5 dedicated cargo aircraft and that indicates that the direction of the air cargo industry is increasinglytoward dedicated cargo aircraft. In twenty years, 80% of the cargo will arrive in dedicated freighters. This indicates that the proposed use of airports such as March and others as primarily cargo airports may work very well in the air commerce marketplace of the 21s` century and that expanding LAX to accommodate a'huge growth in air cargo is unnecessary. 19. Recently, LAX officials unveiled a fourth alternative plan for the expansion of LAX. They say that it is intended to address concerns from airport neighbors, especially El Segundo. Is this a satisfactory solution for El Segundo? • We appreciate the efforts that have been made to address our concerns. We believe the efforts were honest and well intentioned. However, the scale of the proposed expansion of LAX is still such that efforts at mitigation are destined to be inadequate. We do not believe that it is possible to increase the level of passenger andcargoactivity at LAX as is proposed without serious, even dramatic, impacts on neighbors such as ourselves. That is why we urge the region to develop a regional plan to take advantage of other airport resources, especially those in the high growth areas of Southern California.' 20. What is the next step if the City' Council of Los Angeles decides that it is going to go ahead and expand the airport? • Should that occur the City of El Segundo will pursue all of its legal remedies. We believe other cities will join us as well. 21. How do you expect to win in your effort to propose a regional airport plan that constrains LAX and utilizes other airports? • We believe that a regional coalition of communities and constituencies can be built among those who expect to be burdened by the proposed expansion, those who have airports they want to develop, and those who are simply fair minded. Such a coalition would be difficult for the City of Los Angeles to ignore. We believe that the members of the City Council of Los Angeles are responsible people, concerned about the environment, and concerned about fairness to their neighbors. We believe that a majority will prefer to be a regional leader among partners rather than isolated from its neighboring communities. Collaboration, is the prudent course, and the course that will most benefit Los Angeles. 22.` Is there reason to believe that the airlines are interested in utilizing other regional airports? • So long as the proposed expansion of LAX is on the table, we expect the airlines to express reluctance to consider other airports, especially the five largest carriers who are accustomed to operating out of centralized hubs. However, were LAX constrained to the capacity of its existing facilities, we strongly believe that the airlines will follow the market to these other regional airports in the high growth areas of Southern California. They are experienced businesses that would not want their competitors to gain a foothold in these airports uncontested. Contact: Dennis Zane: Urban Dimensions (310) 899-6767 Page 6 v City of Pico Rivera (letter) City of Rancho Cucamonga (letter) City of Redondo Beach (letter) Riverside County Transportation Commission (letter) City of San Bernardino (resolution) County of San Bernardino (resolution) City of South Gate (resolution) City of South Pasadena (resolution) City of South Pasadena City Council (letter); County of Ventura Supervisor Judy Mikels (fetter) State and Federal Elected Officials 1 State Assemblyman Martin Gallegos (letter) State Assemblywoman Shiela Kuehl (tetter) State Assemblyman George Nakano (letter) U.S. Congressman Julian Dixon (letter) U.S. Congressman Stephen Horn (letter) Councils of Goyemment Arroyo Verdugo Cities (letter) Gateway Cities Council of Govemmerrts (resolution) San Bernardino Associated Governments (resolution) San Gabriel Valley Council of Governmentw(letter) South Bay Cities Council of Governments (letter) Western Riverside Council of Governments (letter) Private and other 0man_izations Joint Powers Commission of the March Joint Powers Authority (resolution) League of California Cities Inland Empire Division patter} Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce (letter) Metrolink (letter) Moreno Valley Chamber of Commerce (letter) Moreno Valley March Field Rotary Club (resolution) NorthCounty Transportation Coalition (letter) Ontario Chamber of Commerce (letter) Valley Industry and Commerce Association (letter) J� OF ..OS 4p -. C ° All s ,. QAC/FORN1P COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF AIDS PROGRAMS AND POLICY 600 S. Commonwealth Avenue • Los Angeles CA 90005 (213) 351-8000 November 3, 2000 The Honorable Deborah O'Conner Mayor City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 Dear Mayor O'Conner: E C This is to invite your participation in World AIDS Day 2000 on December 1, 2000. The theme for this year is "AIDS:All Men—Make A Difference!" and is a call for your leadership in addressing the continuing crisis of HIV/AIDS. I am requesting a proclamation from your city to recognize World AIDS Day 2000. Attached is sample proclamation. Your assistance in this regard will be appreciated. The kick-off event for these activities is a breakfast, at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in Los Angeles beginning from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. You will be sent a formal invitation to this event in the hopes that you can attend. Los Angeles County will use the World AIDS Day event to announce dynamic new partnerships among the County, media and community-based organizations that will dramatically increase our ability to reach those in need of HIV counseling, testing and other services. Mark Finucane, Director of the Department of Health, Services, will announce the award of funds raised by staff of the Department of Health Services to improve food services across the County. Other World AIDS Day activities will include HIV memorial events, targeted counseling and testing and HIV educational outreach programs to college, university, school and faith -based groups. I hope that you canjoin in this commemoration of World AIDS Day. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Armando Garcia at (213) 351-8280. ve;yluly ours t Charles L. Henry, Director Office of AIDS Programs and Policy CLH:EH:MLG ENPROJECTMORLDAIDSWIAYOR'S LETTER.DOC Attachment SAMPLE PROCLAMATION" WORLD AIDS DAY --DECEMBER 1, 2000 WHEREAS the global epidemic of HIV infection and AIDS requires a worldwide effort to increase communication, education and united action to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS; and, WHEREAS the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) observes December 1 of each year as World AIDS Day, A,day to expand and strengthen worldwide efforts to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS; and, V`HEREAS UNAIDS estlmatcs that over 34 m lli n people currently . living with HIV/AIDS, with young people under the age of 25 accounting for more than half of all new infections; and, WHEREAS the American Association for World Health is encouraging a better understanding of the challenge of HIV/AIDS nationally as it recognizes that the number of people, diagnosed with HIV and HIDS in the United States continues to increase, with 850,00 people in the U.S. now infected; and, WHEREAS World AIDS Day provides an opportunity to focus local, national, and international attention on HIV infection and AIDS and to disseminate information on how to prevent the spread of HIV; and, WHEREAS, because men represent the majority of people living with HIV/AIDS, the World AIDS Day 2000 theme, AIDS: All Men --Make a Difference!, urges all men to increase their awareness of the risk of HIV/AIDS for themselves, their partners and their children and to use their influence in their families, among their friends and in their communities to help stem the tide of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, , [title] do hereby declare that [your ci[y] will observe World AIDS Day on Deceinber 1, 200:0; I urge all citizens to take part in activities and observances designed to increase awareness and understanding of HIV/AIDS as a global challenge, to take part in HIV/AIDS prevention activities and programs, and to join the global efforts to. prevent the further spread of HIV/AIDS. Sample proclamation prepared by the American Association for World Health. SIVE 7WE (DA7-E DECEMBER Y, 2000 WORLD AIDS DAY 2000 ----- GALA KICK-OFF CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST ----- WHAT: --- IWHAT: 13TH Annual World AIDS Day Celebration Kick -Off Continental` Breakfast WHEN: Friday, December 1, 2000 WHERE: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles County 135 North Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90012 WHO: You are cordially invited. Invited Guests: Members of the Board of Supervisors Local Mayors and other elected officials Guest Celebrities and Personalities Entertainers Audience of 300 guests including Department of Health Services officials, faith based groups, local HIV/AIDS Service providers, business and civic leaders, school leaders and representatives, HIV impacted individuals. Page9 Revised to indicate the RDA beet"ing concluded at, 8,45 p.m. NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL 6.5 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated November 7, 2000 in the amount of $810,445.66. M/O'Connor abstained from approval of a warrant in the amount of $125.64 relating to a potential conflict of interest re and"rn the Lanterman „ i regarding Forensic Expansion Project. 6.6 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT - for September 2000. 6.7 DENIED CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES: 6.7.1 Filed by Erika Daly October 5, 2000 6.7.2 Filed by Juana Daly October 5, 2000 6.7.3 Filed by Juan Garcia October 5, 2000- 6.8 APPROVED EXTENSION OF VENDOR SERVICES FOR PRINTING SERVICES - authorized additional printing services to be performed by Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for FY 00-01. 6.9 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR TRACTS 48487 AND 50314 -,to, Hall & Foreman, Inc. in an amount not -to -exceed $30,273.86. 6.10 ADOPTEDRESOLUTION NO. 2000-54::A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND' BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT ; GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AT ' LEMON AVENUE AND - DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. 6.11 AWARDED CONTRACT TO BONTERRA CONSULTING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR VESTING TRACT MAP NOS. 48487 AND 50314 (WINDMILL DEVELOPMENT/JCC) - in the amount of $83,172 for environmental mitigation monitoring services for 'VTM ` Nos. 48487 and 50314 (Windmill Development/JCC). 6.12 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2000-55: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 'APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT. 6.13 APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SPACES TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION BID NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL renewed on an annual basis, the latest , agreement commenced January 1, 1999 for an eighteen -month period expiring June 30, 2000. On August 30, 2000, NHS Executive- Director William Harford submitted correspondence and a proposed contract in the amount of $72,486, which represents a $7,242 increase over last<year°s contract amount of $65,244. Three options were provided including keeping the contract at its current rate with the adoption of a new fee schedule. Larry Rhodes read from a letter written in January, 2000 by his veterinarian regarding a lawsuit involving' the Inland Valley Humane Society. Carole Meade commended the Inland Valley Humane Society's timely response in dealing with adverse incidents. She recently became aware of the Society's education programs and used their bat education box in her classroom. Janet Clark presented statistical information about the services provided by the Inland Valley Humane Society. Sue Sisk suggested a broader outreach program in the community to inform the community that animals are available for adoption from the Humane Society and recommended that animals be vaccinated to insure that they do not become ill. She reported that an Inland Valley Humane Society employee came to her home and treated her in a rude manner. She would like the City to have an oversight committee or person to react to situations that cannot be resolved through the Humane Society: C/Huff moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to 1) Approve the FY 00-01 contract for animal control services with IVHS in the amount of $65,244; 2) set a public hearing for December 5, 2000 to adopt a new fee schedule as recommended by IVHS and 3)directstaff to keep more diligent track of the Humane Society prior to the City's renewal next year. 8.2 APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER AND ONE ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE AND TWO COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AND TO ALTERNATES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANTERMAN - DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - On October 12, 2000, the Cities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and Pomona, along with the Department of Developmental Services, signed the Statement of Principles and Commitment related to the proposed severe behavioral program at Lanterman Developmental' Center. The Statement specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee`,to (a) assure a full and fair sharing of information and concerns among DDS NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/ Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/O'Connor ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS- None C/Herrera moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to appoint C/Huff as the Council Alternate. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/ Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/O'Connor ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None M/O'Connor returned to. the dias. 7. NEW BUSINESS: None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: M/O'Connor recessed the City Council Meeting at 8:43 p.m: RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/O'Connor reconvened the City Council Meeting at 8:45 p.m. 8. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: None offered. 9. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M'O'Connor adjourned the. meeting at 8:48 p.m. in memory of the passengers who lost their lives in the Singapore Airlines disaster which included General Gunn Liu, father of SCAOMD Director Dr. Gunn Liu; crew members of the U.S.S. Cole tragedy who lost their lives; Mr. Tsao Yung Lien who suffered a tragic accident in D.B. (contact the City for information regarding donations to the family); Louise McReynolds Steffans, and in honor of all Veterans. LYNDA'BURGESS, City Clerk ATTEST:` DEBBY O'CONNOR, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOVEMBER 7, 2000 1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m., Room CC -8, South Coast Air Quality Management District. 1) Public Employment - GC 54957.6 - discussion of Interim City Manager Contract. 2) Conference with Legal Counsel - initiation of Litigation - GC 54956.9 - one case 2. CALL TO ORDER': Mayor O'Connor called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mike l `` ': Armi'o, The Weekly INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Reverend Mike Schuenemeyer, D.B. Congregational Church. ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Connor, Mayor Pro Tem Ansari, and Council Members Chang, Herrera, Huff. Also present were: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director;Mike Nelson, Communications and Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess,,City Clerk: CA/Jenkins reported that there was no reportable action taken during the Closed Session. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: M/O'CQnnor requested that Council Subcommittee Reports and Council Member comments be suspended this evening. Council concurred. 3. A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.A.1 Proclaimed November 15, 2000 as "America Recycles Day." 3.A.2 Presented Certificates of Recognition to D.B. resident David Reynolds, Southcoast Cabinets, and Cimarron Oaks VIII Homeowners Association - "Trash Cutters Award" recipients. 3.A.3 Presented Certificate of Recognition to Andrew Sumpter, D.B. resident; National Academic All-American Scholar. NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL 3.A.4 Quarterly Crime Statistic Report presented by Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff along with an update on Civilian Advisory Committee, now calked the "Public Safety Committee." 3.A.5 Presentation on the City's New Trash Program by Ray Anderson, Waste Management. 3. B. INTERIM CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None offered. 4.A. PUBIC COMMENTS: Joe Dunn, Production Manager, Adelphia Cable, announced that, the company -sponsored blood drive will be held on Friday, November 10 beginning at 1:00 p.m. At the same time, a blood drive will be held at Adelphia's facility in Brea. Larry Rhodes urged people to use controlled watering systems for animals. Leafvacuums should be used instead of leaf blowers. Weed whackers injure trees and animals Thom Pruitt announced upcoming events and activities for the Pop Warner Football and Cheerleading organization. Carolyn Gong presented a petition to the City signed by concerned citizens of D,B., Walnut and surrounding communities requesting support for the building of more streets and highways prior to the building of 400 homes new homes in the area. She recommended that the Council propose an ordinance to fine homeowners $500 to $1000 for failure to landscape their yards within three months of the home purchase. Allen Wilson asked if taxpayer funds are used to support the California Contract Cities Association Political Action Committee (PAC) and if so, to what amount: Sue Sisk said she has not received a response from MPT/Ansari regarding the proposed special truck lane. Marie Buckland expressed concern about three trash cans ,per residence and cans left on the sidewalks on days other than trash pickup days. Her previous request for enforcement of the stop sign at Santaquin and Redgate Drs. has apparently been ignored. What is planned for the Albertson's Center location? 4.B. RESPONSE TO PUBIC COMMENTS: MPT/Ansari responded to Mr. Wilson that Contract Cities PAC monies come from private individuals, engineering companies and other businesses which NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL are donated to both democrats and republicans. ICM/DeStefano indicated to Mrs. Sisk that the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) is undergoing a feasibility study of adding truck lanes on the SR 60 from the 710 fwy. to the San Bernardino County line. Public meetings have been held to discuss the matter. D.B. has received a -draft report, which is available for review and staff is preparing comments on that report. MPT/Ansari indicated that she sent a memo to Sue Sisk of a letter regarding the newspaper article on the truck lane issue. There was no reply from SLAG. She sent a second and third request letter to the head of the committee. She does not serve on that committee and felt the response should come directly from SLAG. Although the newspaper article made it sound as if a truck lane would be a reality, the matter is not on the January agenda. It is a feasibility study and there is no indication that there are plans for the truck lane to be built. Staff is monitoring all meetings and information regarding this matter can be obtained from cityhall. ICM/DeStefano indicated to Mrs. Buckland that the City has rules regarding the placement and storage of trashcans. Trash cans are not permitted to be on the street until the night before trash pickup and cans are to be removed from the street and placed on the individual's property by sundown of the trash pickup day. Cans are supposed to be placed behind some type of barrier (fence, block wall, etc.) and out of sight. City Code Enforcement officers currently monitor this situation. Regarding the stop sign at Santaquin and Redgate, staff willlook into the matter and report back to Council at its next meeting. In addition, Code Enforcement officers will be directed to look into the matter of the slope issue. With respect to Albertson's site, there is current interest in the site by a grocery store operator. M/O'Connor assured Mrs. Buckland that Council and staff conduct ongoing efforts to entice businesses to locate in the City. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 DIAMOND BAR ON-LINE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE - November 8, 2000 - 6:00 p.m., S'CAQMD Room CC -8,'21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - November 9, 2000 - 6:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 VETERANS' DAY - NOVEMBER 10, 2000 (Friday) City Offices will be closed in observance of Veterans Day. Will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000. NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL 5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION - November 14, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER COMMUNITY MEETING - November 15, 2000 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.6 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION- November 16, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.7 DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - November 16, 2000 - 7:00 p.m, SCAQMD Room CC -2,21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.8 COMMUNITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE - November 20, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Room 00-2, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.9 LANTERMAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE November 20, 2000 SCAQMD Room CC -8, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 21 2000 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Chang moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari M/O'Connor NOES:. COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular City Council Meeting of October 17, 2000 - as submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of September 12, 2000, 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of September 26, 2000. 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.3.1 Regular Meeting of August 10, 2000. 6.3.2 Regular Meeting of September 14, 2000, 6.4 RECEIVED AND FILED PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 28, 2000. NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL 6.5 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated November 7, 2000 in the amount of $810,445.66. M/O'Connor abstained from approval of a warrant in the amount of $125.64 relating to a potential conflict of interest regarding the Lanterman Forensic Expansion Project. 6.6 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT - for September 2000. 6.7 DENIED CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES: 6.7.1 Filed by Erika Daly October 5, 2000 6.7.2 Filed by Juana Daly October 5, 2000 6.7.3 Filed by Juan Garcia October 5, 2000 6.8 APPROVED EXTENSION OF VENDOR SERVICES FOR PRINTING SERVICES - authorized additional printing services to be performed by Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for FY 00-01. 6.9 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR TRACTS 48487 AND 50314 - to Hall & Foreman, Inc. in an amount not -to -exceed $30,273.86: 6.10 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2000-54: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AT LEMON AVENUE AND ` DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT -SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. 6.11 AWARDED CONTRACT TO BONTERRA CONSULTING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR VESTING TRACT MAP NOS. 48487 AND 50314 (WINDMILL DEVELOPMENT/JCC) - in the amount of $83,172 for environmental mitigation" monitoring services for VTM Nos. 48487 and 50314 (Windmill Development/JCC). 6.12 ADOPTEDRESOLUTION NO. 2000-55: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT: 6.13 APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SPACES TO INCLUDE' CONSTRUCTION BID NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL ANALYSIS/NEGOTIATION SERVICES RELATIVE TO THE RELOCATION OF CITY HALL TO THE SCAQMD FACILITY AND APPROPRIATE THE NECESSARY FUNDS FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES - and appropriated $4,000 from General Fund reserves. 6.14 APPROVED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH JAMES DE STEFANO TO SERVE AS INTERIM CITY MANAGER - added $1,000/mo. To the current salary of Deputy City Manager as well as an additional 8 hours/mo. for Administrative Leave and authorized the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 - The City received approval of its application for funding under the Bureau of Justice Assistance's (BJA) . Fiscal Year 2000 LLEBG Program in the amount of $56,141 with the City obligated to match $6,238, for a total of $62,379. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to provide units of local government with funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. Capt. Yim of the Walnut/D.B. Sheriff's Station recommends that the LLEBG funds continue to be utilized for the D.B. Special Problems Unit/High Impact Team Deputy. In addition, an Advisory Board has reviewed the proposed use of funds " and concurs with the recommendation of Capt. Yim. Prior to the obligation of funds, a public hearing is required. M/O'Connor opened the Public Hearing. There being notestimony offered, M/O'Connor closed the Public Hearing. C/Huff moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to approve the recommended use of funds as requested by the Walnut/D.B. Sheriff's Station. Motion approved by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chung, Herrera, Huff, MPT/ Ansari, M/O'Connor NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY AND S.P.C.A. (IVHS) CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01' - Continued from October 17, 2000 - Since Incorporation, the City has utilized Inland Valley Humane Society for animal care and control services. Typically NOVEMBER 7, 2000, PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL renewed on an annual basis, the latest agreement commenced January 1, 1999 for an eighteen -month period expiring June 30, 2000. On August 30, 2000, IVHS ' Executive Director William Harford submitted correspondence and a proposed contract in the amount of $72,486, which represents a $7,242 increase over last year's contract amount of $65,244. Three options were provided includingkeeping the contract at its current rate with the adoption of a new fee schedule. Larry Rhodes read from a letter written in January, 2000 by his veterinarian regarding;a lawsuit involving the Inland Valley Humane Society. Carole Meade commended the Inland Valley Humane Society's timely response in dealing with adverse, incidents. She recently became aware of the Society's education programs and used 'their bat education box in her classroom: Janet Clark presented statistical information about the services provided by the Inland' Valley Humane Society. Sue Sisk suggested a broader outreach program in the community to inform the community that animals are available for adoption from the Humane Society and recommended' that animals be vaccinated to insure that they do not become ill. She reported that an Inland Valley Humane Society employee came to her home and treated her in a rude manner. She would like the City to have an oversight committee or person to react to situations that cannot be resolved through the Humane' Society. C/Huff moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to 1) Approve the FY 00-01 contract for animal control services with IVHS in the amount' of $65,244; 2) set a public hearing for December 5, 2000 to adopt a new fee schedule as recommended by IVHS and 3) direct staff to keep more diligent track of the Humane Society prior to the City's renewal next year. 8.2 APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL' MEMBER AND ONE ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE AND TWO - COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AND TO ALTERNATES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - On October 12, 2000, the Cities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and Pomona, along with the Department of Developmental Services, signed the Statement of Principles and Commitment related.to the proposed severe behavioral program at Lanterman Developmental Center. The Statement specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee to (a) assure a full and fair sharing of information' and concerns among DDS ---- - ---- - NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL and the local communities and their residents with respect to the ongoing operation of the specialized behavioral program at LDC and (b) confirm, on an ongoing basis, that DDS/LDS are in compliance with the terms and conditions to be, set forth in this Agreement and other legal requirements relating to the specialized behavioral program. The Committee shall consist of "...three (3) representatives from the City of Diamond Bar (2) of whom will be residents who are not elected officials or employees of that City or Employees of Lanterman Developmental Center Committee..."The first meeting of the State Advisory Committee will be held on December 4, 2000. M/O'Connor recused herself from'discussion of this matter, passed the gavel to MPT/Arisari and left the dias. C/Herrera suggested that Council not take action to appoint two alternates until approval of alternates by the Advisory Committee at its next meeting. Sue Sisk disagreed that Council should be the appointing authority and asked that the entire Advisory Committee be advised prior to any Council action being taken. Her understanding was that nominations were to be made by the Committee and brought to the Council for vote. Larry Rhodes supported Council appointment of the first three, committee members this evening. Dick Farrell urged Council to approve appointments as suggested by C/Herrera. Marie Buckland objected to having members on the committee who have not been involved with this issue during the past couple of years. Don Gravdahl agreed that appointments should be the people who have been members in the Advisory Committee and who have actively participated in this issue. C/Chang suggested appointment of Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell and supported the appointment of C/Herrera. C/Chang moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to appoint one City Council representative (C/Herrera) and two community members (Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell) to represent the City on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: ,, T -, --- 7- --- -- --11 - .a NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/ Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/O'Connor ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS - None C/Herrera moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to appoint C/Huffas the Council Alternate. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/ Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - M/O'Connor ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None M/O'Connor returned to the Bias. 7. NEW BUSINESS: None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: M/O'Connor recessed the City Council Meeting at 8:43 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/O'Connor reconvened the City Council Meeting at 8:43 p.m. 8. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: None offered. 9. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M'O'Connor adjourned the meeting at ' 8:48 p.m. in memory of the passengers who lost their lives in the Singapore Airlines disaster which included General Gunn Liu, father of SCAQMD Director Dr. Gunn Liu; crew members of the U.S.S. Cole tragedy who lost their lives; Mr. Tsao Yung Lien who suffered a tragic accident in D.B. (contact the City for information regarding donations to the family); Louise McReynolds Steffans, and in honor of all Veterans. LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk ATTEST: DEBBY O'CONNOR, Mayor OCTOBER 10, 2000 PAGE 4, PLANNING COMMISSIO restaurant, including overcrowding, overflow parking and severe traffic problems at the site. The restaurant's security serves the premises well. Problems occurimmediately off- site,in the Gentle Springs area. OCTOBER 10, 2000 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1012000 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2000PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2000 ; PAGE FLANNING COMMISSION. endly aspossible because Diamond Bar he case of Platinum, there are problems finer. . Jill Pierce'respondecl to OlRuzicka that,although she had the number:of, . been issued<to`the prior businessT no one coin locate the CUP which business. As a result, Platinum had to rnalke a new application, Prior' .he Jherff's iedadequate find gathered reminute by [ as a normal AFlannery ,. -are not the to receive a: ails. 1 for OCTOBER 10, 2000 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2000 PAGE 14 PLANNING COMMISSIO\ K.Uiamon" OCTOBER 10, 2000 PAGE 18 PLANNING COMMISSION x CITY OF DIA= BAR FSI DATES '11/1bl 14=34.37 VOLVER REGISTER FAUE;' DUE THRU' 11 /tel 12000 « PREPAID FWD/SECT-ACCT=PRDi1EC7-ACCT - PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMMW DATE CHECK; 4-M, EINGPLEERING X. 25052310-46415-155hO0-46A15 R-816A, 3143706 PROS PAR,: 18,704.55 TOTAL PRE FAIDG .00 i DIAL VC3V9C R^ 15 , 7 0!4.55 TOTAL L {E i� xx €€ �R 8 70 9 M. AAA CF�=ICE MACRINES uY ?I!-RKS , 0O14OR 4? ?-_ r Ri s IR l� e_ sYC't R? 115.31 TOTAL PREPAII35 305, TOTAL VOUCHERS vOv. v1 TOTAL DITE VENDOR 30. al AC9ERIC?R CLASSIC vAR3iTA"IOC# 03€°15315 4 1 et}- i?5�4 1ii'.j LS PRTSL-Ls RF'9122-10/19 � 1.4U 0301531`-42130-- 105:'3 1 012 LSE PRTBL-LIM1O120-1111" °.Ou TOTAL PREPAIDS aOfJ Q - TOT A.L ` IUCRERS TOT, AlL DUE VENDOR 519.48 :N.flNIA ART a4Ii`43i M O1140,3 412 t0-- i'1::yrs.= CITY tjtjl9:, - LOBO 15.30 TO AL PREPHIDS .00 ?OTAL €,1tU3. HUS TOTAL .DUE VENDOR, 18.30 EPRIIST lIE . NIN AN (f c^,cfi Act _ inj ;.q TiStu'ri T 4LASKSL LL Cr}.LY) c' OTAL PF AIDS TOT AL 4f3.ik C-w}ER 90.00 BIPL DUE VEND10R' 90.00 DTT,'3'1I" 3. tTC1-- 00 :.544S 1= R 4C�i -10,126 4,a00. TOTAL E'REPs;IIS .00 TG 1 AL VOUNERS 45.00Y TOTAL DUE VENDOR 45.00 re ENTFO3UT c6-N3-U: TAN"rS 0'x'144403 44040''- 10311 10 u0 ENER PREF` SkrLS-D€_•T t3O 1537.50- 001..40 412CA LCT 00 ,UPPLIES-E IER PREP SNCS195.22 TOTAL PREF0IL5 .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1 642. 72 .. TOTAL L VENDOR 1,642.72 T- �10RKES . r t;i--, 4.1FK' s1120 SLIDM_� E GG"KLFP S 40.00 TOTAL LEF'AIDS .00 $ .,.i r.L � �L,i.#iLRy V. 00 _ TOT�� DUE VE 40.00 996427 SUPPLIES-F` LOWEEEN B;PdiGI £STA. PR_FAIDv .0+n 10TAL VOUCHERS '7 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 82.27 =S,CITY=t)FMAMMU BAR 'RUN DOTE. 11/16/2,M 14*443,7 VOUMB REGISTER PACE 'DUE TM ; 1112112010 -.PREPAID FU;ID/SECT—AECT—PROTECT—ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION ArtOUNT DATE €+M t)cA 0901-42125-_ LMNS DIST CHAFZSES 16.79 +i i g 4Li 25- LONE DIST CHARGES f 7.95 TOTAL fiEPAIDBx4� nv TOMYGiCiERS _--4,74 TOTAL IE: VENDOR 44.74 -IRELE ATT4 1y64411 421x4-- CELL LI.WGE5=5tjsERIFF 26.10, 00'14415-42125-- CELL CHA SS VIPATROL 58. M. 0011 0, 421 -- CELL .CHIARGES—CITY M, ER 2.9.67 =tal4ri{r 4_:.[-- GEI I CfiAR S—Gi I fiFL 26yaSO TL�-TALI PREPAT:DS .00 TOTAL VDUCPEf LS 177. , 2 M p�! �� ( j�� TO 27 BPI I�jg%hl pUIL'S>' 0014050 42;140 7020 PRINT M—PAYROLL C UIKS 250.29 TOTAL PREPAIDS .+ TOT'L VOUCI?tF5 250.29, 'TOTAL DUE VENDOR 00.29 I IOR B ATT% 0 2 ? -- 512L,'0 REFUNT. PV DEP—REAGAN 50.00; TOTAL PREPAIDS .010 n TOTAL ;I UMHERS 50.4Ct TOTAL PJTE VENDOR' 50.00 ELOISE B=Ly u t+!., 34 420—_ 6W, V FECREW19N REFUND 19.00 TOTIRL FREPAIIS- i TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUEVENDS. u=T Llri a TNvi • '.. 0,01-5348-422r.+0i 574 REPAIRGCS -} N EA PY 246M . ._15:2. 4L_1+}-_ 676 ELECT SVCS—Sl'"lhllTr.IIa.I?E 24M.3 .. ,..3•. '_ .. T....a. s,_': _:[ a .v... EEE+ , 5i'EERTtGE Pt•. 4,Ds 00,15 -3-2q 2,a:0- A, I- 573 ELECT SVCS—R REAAnPV 6 387.66 ?CTAS FRE€AIDu TOTAL VOU.l?tr' 1,`SR.3v TO. A{ C!+C �. ENDDR :.. 1,288.70 Li [ . t �� t7.1? rnpSY r+ C :111 CONTRACT _ULA : E ALL (:. - 34.0.1 TOTAL FF F IDS .€ 0; TOTAL vajt-YERv 84.0+++1 TOTAL DUE WMBIOR ` 54.00 MIN., _tri - 0 10 15 - +, A 1210 — 1M57 , 0,152 2' ' _ SUPPLIES—RECREATION 6 3.14' TOTALFl AIDS TOTAL VO Q U CLI US 60'10+.14 TOTAL DL:'E VEN 0R' 600.14 RLN DA?E: 11116{ G€3 #= 37 t ,°„ 1 'ER r GGIEiE!? RGr� ti -.. ... ;DLTT .1. imi`I2o. ? - FREOAI FU?,DISEET-ACET-PROJECT-ACT FE 4' INVEIEE DE IFTI3" AMOUNT ;TATE tHECK U-1 1FORNIA CONITRACT CITIES ASS 0 1403 422,,'v-- EIMI.MAGER, MT.6-11FIYLE 8124 2.00 ; TOTAL PREPAIDS w00 TOTAL VCJ?MERS 2:7.00 - TOTAL DUE VENDER< CAL, IFUMNIA F'AVEWNTI MiAINT COMPANY 7545510-46421-rji449.464i1 10.374 .2013479 PROF TrES-SLIURRY SEAL FFtj 495.00 25G5 1( -4k=411- 149` =4£4i1 10374 100479 FROFF $`JCS -SLURRY rSEAL RF;J 436,395.46 11 TOTAL FREFAIFSS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 426 ,�':�1.46'', TOTAL -DUE MILER ROBIN CALLOT 39722 RECREATION REFUND 29.00, .. .... TOTT �. FR: -P.4 IDS ,'. •€.moi TTAi V[I43CrRu 29.0 TM 4L UE' JEINUF 1.9.00 i sv3.n'; — 1"L1Cl REFI!' D f {; TOTAL FRERAIDSS TGTAI V'JINHERE TOTAL DUE WNDOR. v;-€RLES NOT i A •CEI TEES IE'C 844 7561 PFucaC#ILS-FLAfd CHECK 127.50 u 1-510-4 27-- 1'' f_k 7 69 PROF, SVCS 127.% 1:cnt r_c, [" e S-ifIC"4Lryi! i6 8 , vy..t .•'331 : :!�'=-�M1SI:=Err;O.1 ,�',�3# - 7;1 s'K .SVr -FLAIMI IMEa. FRO t 83.40 _ 3 13 L' +S - 7 � P" 55110 '+__ f• ttj: ?"..= O 3- 7567 FrK09: SkiCS-REVIEW LOT, LIKE 170.00 s= F3' n-_ ..._v _�•J+ ._s.. PRQP tt [-P Y0.k {�j_#r�"�, ,: . 3 L.v v. L3 -1'i Gas. -i.. 664.05,: L , L PREPAEi�S a�JV�' •�E•OT1F' T0TA,_ CLUE VEND 13 �, M.69 e _voTp Cnp,Fu`c;�rl3ty ilz5` 1COY 36 6 .T` 1.503 a__... UMTF„i rRNTL £}6.`,':::1-1x0}.-';� U.7 4i+v\-- _ iVv..�.�. i::A3i5'4 �''�!!_i �:i .. I: L :IJvi i:9 I lR +.�tv i. _ 10-34 � .a3 t ., ,C qP i5O r? s €�.'aT 01-all, 1#)il'� i.`313Jj €#�41 t 3 l �3 {1i'.06 �� T0TAIL FR.E?AIDS TCT iL iLll w 69w6 TT {+ fes•, TQTAIL L-�L`;.{{L 1:L7i: R L. r 1 e1 0nsviv—_ '"MT'.7 {3T6 CLPc`c-LG ca 7v =� i ' 0 31 TCTIA- PREPAIL-u' 54.70 R.5 .00 TOTAL ?�# 'wrilLrlR 54.7 4 „CITY CF DIARMS49MR FUN MTE1 1112412WO 144f*137 UCl t RE&ISIER PAGE'' 4 : 141UE `FHRU1 111211-M PREPAID 4LrV0/FELT-ACCT-PRO!ECT-ACCT . PO # MICE DEESC-RIPTION A�1'�'_.l1NT DATE CHECK DAY t-KITE COPY`CENTEP. t�D15aaC�-4`110-- PRINT 54'-POSTC4P 5.',.6'9 TOFPREPAIDS .00i pAL TOTAL IIL ?ENI10R _ `9 53. 'DELTA CARE Pt'lI 01-2 104-_ [ 1-D'-NTF:''L PREMIUM 2_=r .40 1 � 121 /2000 415514, T?TAL PSEPAlDS X7.40 TOTAL tlOs„icr{EFE .t3 TOTAL DUE VEMOR ' 2,67.48 DELTA D VITAL C�y11-11`1t>4-- P }-OEMTA1 PREI�I 14 1746.00 "11; 23Y � X4 03 luTs�� rREc -IDS ?'.746.00 TOTAL 't�OUCr?ERw , (3^ o TOT1;L DUESsr�tU01� 1 74 ,W CARGO LNIS 0°.1`210 440'0}:-_ 102934 PE [F�:72• PROF.S3: -F`LIf CO r, 121},D0 0015 4400c_-- - A10191 ' %Tlo?= F%F.SVCS-T&T COmr, OC.Di► 0:x.154.0, 44000-_ ,", AF=1?;12 PF�.S4'CS-AIt"1IN RE4'N . 1t�.t�fi! ;,,11535( 44000-- A1C11?I P°R1016 FrFOF.St�CS-PSR 11TG' 0,,c,`, tDTAL PR PRIM too TOTS} VO! 1 HIER, 490. Oki TOTAL Did,s VENDOR 4P x.00 DEPARTt ENT OF'TRP' 0FRTnTION j,1l�:,- .� ,;r__ 1C .111 154M5 SIONA` ;AIN? SEPT 00 514.20 Tl P1 p p IJS TDT�VOi� •; 4, r L X14 . i•: n TOTAL DUI ; a I it lip 514.2. v,s[i 4� 1-�. � 5'4. 41 i . 1#. '•Jv LB-VL6-3 iNSCM SIC-LEANDR!C41NOOK 4,094.00. ?TAL VOUCHERS 42094.0':1 TOTAL I�L� '{ r.NOF 4, 1 1, 01 00'1`10-42L i,-- it?iIi'• CAF !{ ter} :t OLE civ} 4'Eh 4; .0 } .az... l.XL7L _ CAR �L LF CAP, fL%" '36.85 .. J0 TAL PREPAID TOTAL vC 1YEttY 8&65 TOTAL DUE VENDOR :. 83. vi .,} it SAE Iiu} Ed,S CIA s -105;5-42115— 1f 6232 .05,6 MURTS...M. }NT-[Ohl; . KTG/PLNN S80.00 !1-_;0 4__15=- rrt} - i!'LIOAY RIDE 44G1.U0' TOTAL. PREPAIDS .00A TOTAL VOUCH 1�A1^.fir' TOTAL DUE VENDOR , 1'314Tj.OD CITY'F#F�d' BAR F.L? Lt�TE= 11�ih7iC`00 14.54=57' ' ', V'i3CrER R�CISTEP PAM: v PREPAID FJtdO SECT-ACCT- OJECT-ACCT PO # IMMICE DSRCRIPT'.IDIN 41"CM FATSCHEM '.: uIPIMORBAF IL 4�F1�..1 4 •?�_ .' .:iTS rads) q kryr ±� �j , <15.5vkLi. �?T� li':'ii�.iia1v3=.'F �rtn1'v �FiZV: 't..�'.71 —_ 1'! F.kse�k, t-U — idL'r'4�Q i-:� . r _. 0-01I r 10-4 3-10-- OCT OC, c _ COMMI SIVICS 24:f 1 ` kk�' i`r' AIDS TOTAL •00 . TOTAL VC4%C~� rt TOTAL IEUIE :VECDMR6?:g3': DIAM.�iNM PAR, F'CtTt CASH y. 001.53550-41200— Ry'FtEATIM - VJFTl -1 'S 0IrIs4F,�., 4iu;Ia-- CO!4�t ? MUG- SL�LIES 27, 00 C2{'14".404?34t'--EMBR! PREF` - KTSu. u�. {�J15551 4t sed` 'D%LR MEETINGS M; 15�4232 'DrU SRMUNLIES� OF 's 01014030- 4y_30 CITY MIAAN GtR-TRMVLLT:.JRE .53 4FM-- CITY CgLE)fiJj'�- 15.00 �`Olfi�v�k ii. 5—.— 5 ¢[EET1P,iGS .eDy F' �t'€S`s"-.'kk.3E? MEET;INBS ii.•14. 001,5'"o-ft COM.DEVELOP ENT SUPPLIES., 47.09 �42 +LF�AlLLBTtaEFS4;14,: t :. J-2 3140 41�Ov- COQ M TRAVEL& CON. F 6.47 TOTAL PREFAITDS TOTAL YQIS1;ERt TOTAL i{UE'VENIJ0F3 rkFliLL I A'. hiJ B AR—fln,E�,' A�E?hi Y {� .:- C{ �f .s • "115 — ((r r:.. �.r,{ AL,IAvt TO RISA-ii�it Ot IRIii: 121 f, -J.-s lrS� c'e,.00 1fl.i2lfr€7` RL'A1121 TOTAL FRFA'OS 560.00 TOTAL t'CJC LRs TOTAL �lv'E VERT IR 560.00 .. TATn !j . P f.,T -. t� ; 4� 1--71t :_ �NCTC.TI4-H�L#dP;FLL FST X6.09 TOTAL PRryEPAMS T:Ji Y Iii3�u�FuHIiCkl r":�' ', ,•-.1 TOTAL IL.iE VENDOP r,IE, LAY TECH c}�s,{RITe ., -. . _- L }y! k_ k .r� 4. ,.-- 10 ? 4 rr8 Tp r rr sl u_ M SVCS if'4.. E HE�,IF MS Ak CO�i k.34 3 � Y19C.a01 . TOTAL PRS°AI!?S .00 TOTAL VgjcHER5 :,1 0.01 ' TOTAL �UE_-VEC,I�OR 2,190.91 - LIBURSI 3. ELI P'.ARATR Hl'`01 i I iL- 111.,_r 0 4 311C_'-- 100 St siTTLE 54v� Ce1CRT5 FAFir:' 1`,125=00.. 10263 FROE' l0�tx1'-its/11 ' 16,031.40 —475 1255 5 M9 r FRE 14 TOTS{ PL:F9�TM .0a TTOTAL tlnl}rt��44 kr.;7cf!'�k'F., riF:a.,,,�.kk,��.�y.SlsF�t[ 1 4 ^7 TOTAL Y vi 1 FlS'x 311 9, 6.3 1 z IN- 0(j3 , •'�. J 1; : -- 114p;1 Chi . �u iie i veLi"iv-i—F.r..•1*1. V' TuT PR'hk'-';;IT TOTAL VUU:.HE S 3O,a00 TOTAL OUE =4d??;. '_ 0a00 CITY OF.; LI#1yaqT-. BAF; RUIN DATE'111161200-014.341;7 R REGISTER ?AGE 6 "DU r = li `�1f2t i1 PREPAID PQ ,# I%'V,'UCE DEKRI P: a A -M-.. T DATE. CHECK "4:5:1`3470:x'- J71+;J4 RECREATIM REiti1 •.�•—f akalhh°:. �•i TOTAL LrE�FA3Lia •l L' TC£TAll VOUCHER: TOTAL I.I1z:;,`ENDOR EDUCATION IG CEL, INC C�£1r 5: 4-30 1535 1[x140 � s,£x .7 '' C ? TAU CLASS ' FAi...!_ 4��:00 TOTAL PREPAMS, v TOTAL VG tt hERv' 2�2.00 TOTAL i:LE VENDOR . 223. EMPLO ;ENT %Ev LOPMENT DEPART ml 0014090-40M- - o-SRB RT -';'GQ 1]{Ic I LY 3T "C# vS-uL�-SEPT '•" 1,;523.7 : . TOT' FREFAIM .00 TOTAL V01JEHERS i.' IL::TL DUENDWR SGA ESQ. I V E L RECREATT Ohl REFUND iflTAL PREPAiDS .tt T eTAL JMCERS TOTAL �.LE VF GR r 19.{00, Er•Et'AL.v RE r -3r' 51636 63192 E fiESS MIk Pi Go -39- 4.+ 40 ,.. 2� 01 .41StvK4 iv EXPRESS iiAIL_ fZ'Il A'1�3^ 12,,__ 73?1'301 "= - EXT';, S MAIL-CJUP3N14030 C212(11-- fr2 434. EPRE 6 Il- FMRAL SO',T; 31,R1 56336-63192 EXPRESS ?` I -FPL 0£, 42 zz.20 XPRESS MAli_ii'63"92, E: J4,.6563: TOTAL PREFAIBS VD! HER T i .L .i DI7Jj Lzi't .^L•EJI" �"L.fki3: V �...v74v - 0 1 R: M, IM t . t �i5.,fir=.. TUNf RE AT S; TOTAl VOUCHER 00 TOTAL DUE VENDU�: :^ CHOICE CCFrEE SSI v,' �li.a 1x•,21 _.•� EG r�Nlr .;_C' 0 , it. IIT z3 R S AID .{ TPIT A" klo"CHERS e 17.055 TL3TAL GL'E �ENI#R ` 17a95 r c : CA' 4CRAINSrtidPft :. It TOIT AL rlTp 40 TOTAL DUE VENDOR,iso .4c -- a. tITi WDIAMOND-'EAR Rte DATE.' 1111612000 14:34=37 VOl1YER'RESISTER PACE= DUE THR#I 11/21/2000 F°REPAIEt Pl.WDISECT- ACCT - PROJECT -ACCT PO # IMMICE DESCR PTIMl AMOUNT DATE CHECK FLOFERS AME LB 0014690-424395-- 4L~+'hC_- 1..748 IMM ARRI i-WiN!.3'li\S1'KOI�NZ 1140.773 TOTAL HREPAIDE ,00 TOTAL�HEA,S .��, °S TOTAL DU>. VENDOR j • 4C� , ; i DAVID-BABN 41224 REFUND F'k. DE° 141RITAM 200.00 TOTAL PREPAID .t TOTAL `1EPMERS 200,00 TOTAL D'jE VE "ID 200, 00 CO1�lL'IE .EISLER 105532 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 40.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS,In TOTAL V%0AMERSS 4i„cfn TOTAL DUE VEMIR 4lstl0 , Cr 1 i .0 .r A O° �ATES IN Cms[ls•-_•.• ._F._!��,9-464.1 o.`' „C:.. CGS1 j1�"LURR 1 ua if ,-�C -TOT A;_ PREPAID:• .00 TOTAL VOLT HERS T3f�AL DUE VENDOR ` . O S�'4t r, =L •.03 tR.;r:F1Tc MPuR _L SYSTEMS '. .. _.. .;... _={S±C .=?ruAFPITI F{EP1`-OLTNO 3 .. "tl40.tli _ sCTnL PraEPAIoS 0 � TOTAL t#"Jt?'E_ i'1' . 0' TO i AL LIE ` Eki'EOR 47 n Fit p ._.•=30,21 .0. 46 t CTA IOP 1033..z TC'ThL P..: FAIDS .001 TOT AL VOUCHER'S 103.95 TOTAL, DUE VENDOR 100.95.” APHICS UNITED 2 1{-_ _•5-42110- - . F �T�i 6' 1.0 T{ � Art {O'ss'v� r v M. Of Lt.�? H-IDUSC 7'LIF-3-. Sil-HIND ____tea. _DIK EM 4 W,ORY TOT L REP; ,I 5 TC A_ VOi?1f1HERr_t TL.G. 00 TOTAL DUB V IMF 160. DO .._� _tIT DF DIAMM RAR FUN DATE.' 21116 $000 14.3#;37 �101(CHEF F,EGISTER PAGE. S DUE THRID 1112112 PREPAID FUNDISECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PG itivDICE DESCRIPTION (tMMUT DATE CACI; 0017510-452127-- 10479 41151 PU.9YU INSPECTION W. 22 - 0015510 45::27-- i=.4Lit 41150 PROMMS-INSPECTION •: 1171.50 O015510 -4M277-- 102864114: FFUF.R4'i `-lti5 E"TI't njI.0 00i5510 452222 1C^72 41140 PROF.S'�U - INSPECTION .510 001--4101 -- 41154 PR10F.Si'CS-EN 010-293 1,640.0 €30145551 49r-3-- 1C"t.f 41131 PFCiFaS�CS-PLAN CHECK , 001.5551 4......3-- .`3456: 41;15:; °kO{C.SVCS,_pPLAN CIECK 717155.01 0015510-45227__ ?C1'Y: ?11�'� PCU' nu'4f�-I'.\ �= T C 89.26 00155110-455M- 648a 411,E S 7" -INS 13:LIS 'r "015510-45227-_ " :� 3Lvvt 41144 PROF,S'CS - INSPECTION 2":.5 ' ;CTAL PtREUP IDES .� TOTAL VOUCHERS 5,937.41 ' TOT�?LI:t- u?iNI�O'1`-.. :s.,iit s �++ ��++ dESSICA 4AL L GO 415350 45.0€3-- 1012A CONTRACT: CLASS -FALL ,: o.06 TOTAL .PREPAIDS .90' TOTI A'" MUC.HERS TOTAL DUE VENDEGN ` 300.00 r r. ! n-- .A =-� qtr+ ., t ii:NVT.I 1_ IN:{-��i. Ci 3.13.'21'-.1.) �ili LLC -. - 0 0115 :51 415530'1-- 105 12' COIkuTFiii — 1 y � TOTAL, PREPAIIC .00 TOTAL VGUCHERS 36.00 TOTS! DUE VENDOR 3ti.00 . ALU: ° .f=.NMEZ ` '`' 1. _` a--OaTRACT "LAS F! LL °f8>€�3; TO.1 P EPAID'S .D TDTk .,;HE MTAL retic ,tEu.Ct?E '?ism, f Mi I{ r 4 r5-42111-- t 233 e- 2331 �.C1n PF ES €.i' .. 1{ S• R 6; .�� r.:E,ra.r�:S'CS- AFF CuJ�'S C, 656.97 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 ... TOT"i V'O{ C Esc P a i 656.9 _ €OTAL Utf s��,r€OR 66>97 HOME BASE 0-M14-4Mf;-- _ . EL'FPLI=L-GO"? 1`,SV: s 89.92 cc=. _•.Jil'vv!'--?_�Pf}LiE5-4LL'E41 EVENT 75.67, TOTAL PREPAID TOTAL VOUDIERS 165.5 TOTAL DUE VENA; : 165,59 L; DE OUT x'.151314 41_11`>-- EXIT SIGNPEPL - H" 496.136 TOTAL PR,TPAIuS ,^�? IOTA! VOMiicR$ 49e.46 TOTAL DDE VENIiOR 496.06 r Si IT'Y' IAMMD, BAR RL' DATE; _1111612000 ' 141-24-137 4 3 HEFt 'REGISTER FAZE' 9 I'THFtO: 1L/L1/2G ; PREPAID FL;�I/5ECT-ACCT'PRGs'ECT-ACCT FG t INVOICE GEGCFIFTIGv Awl 14T GENE 'j -HECK ,JEFF PUL _ G 1535Lf'44iQG" p ❑ omloo tt {- C+ Ps CG�i�t-1�F{r2Cs � -' 45L0� ; T OTP.L PREPAIi5 , 00 TOTAL v"G°x CHERS' 45 L G TGTAL DUE VEND -OR 45.00 HYATT PEGENIC"` 001403 42 O-- Me. CWF ESTEFAING 20.,{ :. 179 .''S,'., -. iii 1,12000 ..... 61597, TOTAL PREFAIMS 179.20 TE 'IAL �IGo —S , TGTAL DUE VENDOR, ' 179.2t, Tu S t''RETIR= UTI TRf; T _r} 7, 0' M, FF21- E!OV- M, "aTRI3 ALL L'E?v 1 ,700:03 11/2112(40 415 Q 14030 40 _.7 FP 1-22 PG}-C3:�iTEt?CT vGNIRIi3 400.01;111212000 4UV;251 PP21-22 NOV PAYROLL DEDU TI CS 37690.34>11121r210,0t 465 . TGTAL PPEFAIDS i1n_r��3.37' TOTAL VOUCH Rt .00 -. ,Yr_Y?EStL ,.rTji 90.37 .., I..h7A RE A IPEmEn! i 401 O •:1 2-1 a Ji-- FP21722DEF C0M 401(A) 11342.30 11!2112000 4559 T A. PRE c. t 2.' ..,� . TGAVOICHE .00 T3 T A� ,DUE':'3r GE 1 -M.3 } I CRli I :., .. 001405-0-44030-- ft 105°5 y' 1�p; c+ 5600 AMMIL i1:4T ICS -11/00-11/01 I"gti.82 AML FREPL?DE LAG, TGTAL VOUCHLeu 1,965.32 TOTAL DUE VENDOR "' 1,965.' st;_SI'll _ V=_LLt: DAILY BULLETIN i 4:.'f- 120 SU CRIPTION RENEWAL 38.74 0- 104 4115_- j 10-1,146 01434.7 IPI -REVIEW GF LLEEL� e4,05 TOTAL PPtEFAII€bCIO TGTAL 'iLIJC Er,5 94.79 f GTA DUE i{ 1fi#OF 94179 I1TEnI TIu Ail rRL:TECTI':_ 3rC.3 ItaC IOG21 016 ui1CROSSiNL GUARD E':s 31M -OCT 3,21...5 TOTAL PREFHIE`S .00 ' TAArs 'xG HEr,U 8 219, ,25 }., •. TGL 8i.s +iESM{A:2 8,21+.2re ._ .. io -10/12 TGTA1 P:tifA:I;G 45.E TOT AL 'JUE VENDOR, : Y, CITY OF-DIRM� BAR IfATEfi 'I1;16/2000 1434:37 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 10 DLIE TFtTiJ, I1 2 11,Mth PREPAID FUhr-J5ECT-A=T FFC'JECT-A,�`CT 'PtD # INVOICE DESCRIPTION Ai NT GATE CHEG�; JOBS AVAILP,PLE 1F &Au,EIGIN c uE ALS ;t -7 00 MT('i FREPAIDS [ E , TOTA:. WOUCHERS� 276. r40 , TQTAL DUJC vE"9D 276[0}. —E A GONSAL}ES &SON INC 0014010 44000-- 102,&0 " LEui LA?IVE SVC. - NOV 3,Mv.CIO ' TOTALP=iEFA.T S ? TGTAll L VOMMEP-.S 3,ci0OM TOTAL DUE VENDOR . ti. 000. cru MA Ji'L v�Si 00115210-42330— RUMB-RDA SCIS 10/1"M 75.010 T3TPL PFE°AIDS .00 T[ITAL DUEHENS 71.. 00 i T9TAL DL E t;cNEM 75.00 JUDICIAL DATA `cySTEMS CDPPORATIM 001_4411 Vj&04-- SEPT . O PP:RKING CP TE AL' -?"3!V -SEPT 71TAL. PREFPAIDS .00 TGTAL VOUCHERS 160.76 TEITAL DUE VENDOR ' 1&0.76 001.5 50 4i S. LF -.� SeP 00 Sl1PRLS '_ RE4Rcr.ATi4Fi"r �S1.7a 7i '.. 00+5331 fl, 41 3 1, f,-- - SEPT 00 PLS - PrP411; 46.2 )U 14090-4 1 a ,.5-- SEPT 00 SUPPLS - GtNERAL 13.5 .0 -316- 4 �1C°-- :A L '• SEPT 00 S6LS -;i� �L� 1?ILL P}' . 10.73 " l.- 1 �1- 4law SrPT 00 SLIFrLS- _lErlinBE 36[6x£ Ool A � - R T o �� PLS - CGt�'EPT' IN 1 }, .:9. 1 1'C8l53318-4' ° "}--SE.P r 010 SULc - r,Tt�A }. 53,40 • -fdakL SEF. 00 SUPPLS -HERITAGE' PY MQ c`FT , 61 E''trrli.F, 6 C C: "1",,4.Pr: ,. 6. 1-... :.. .. SE T { 0 i�.:x�"�Lz PF, x� � y 185F.99 ,3 C 00 a. _-,- Ls .. v ERSW Y - 8.64 SEPT (lf1 {�Pt-LC, - v •n Vh� 1t�i v , i.a ' . 1 K 13.18.,+1'.. - T{ T ,A_ P'EA.s% {{'Y ; 622.77 y + E.C. �yyyy ,1:.E� iL G - ` �i.tv: f:. ._ KTM ?? .s 7`:-- � t377` ri '0. o T1,THL PREPAIDE ,` J T1)1Aa VOUCHERS 30.0:' - TDTAL DQE" VEh,�CO 1. iv . .x.,FA x:t,x EjxH 47 Try-_ Axa _ v: g0-17 +V�C � i4Y`F:' 3 ; ? f �",_' L4 i IUN i'•yxx FUK.i.. ca} 5i .00 -_ •. - uTA.l ixRE,P-AI: b 100 , TOTAL t C'UCHERS T1TAL DJE VES 1iOR u 1 [ 00 DIRMONV Mw RUN LDATE; ;I1Tl6J' 0 14.34.37 VOL ER RESISTER PACE., 11 I Ti tCI R S A. / � 00 PREPAID} F��Lr'ucCT-r�C T-PRLI�E ?-s�tP? T`P, I)ESCkIPTIDN 'MOUNT DATE 4�EC}'v KJLi iftAGE INC 5315:35})-41200-;- 10483 5673`v SUPPLIES-T-SFCIRTS'R_C 432.51 TOTAL PREP .00 TCTI;L VOUCHERS 4.32.51 "TOTAL BlUE VEP DOR432.51 JOE, KUNG. `0015553-44100-,-, T Y� T COMM 'i /i.' 4u.00 TtIT:A� PFEPfiIS ,00 TOTAL VCt'JCliERS 45. ?ty TOTAL DUE VENDOR 45.00 LAI>.A'l TMr.,ISIT INC 1125363-45310--, 8,16-422:=7 EXCURSION-FllH-t t ? PAT 277.55 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL Vii !w I ERS 277.55 TC?TA>i BLE VENMROD 277a81P5 LEAGUE '01: CCi i it LEG �?TS-S�RiL3aV� 1i.`2112i}flt} 453y 00I403s? 42325-- LEAL MTC -L YLE,A�?+?L,STR11'QI,t2 4 , -TOTAL PREPAIBS 9.2.43 TGIt?' i;Lr�EF_S YAL LSE VENDOR ".0 y* ra+;• ?r TCC'..: ONI& AMC LE Ml PF'C'c.5!'CS - EN `��-IC7 1,i4s.53.: T"�TAL PREPAI TC [ AL SLE �tE�di}uR 1;147 , 5t} } ERM 4835.00 TOTAL PREPAIL}S >3? TOTAL €)DUC !ERS 485. of) TOTAi DUE L VENDOR 3.'�}rR ?i 7 r 00 '.. � C SE LEVV .. .u.: t. r;..i0-- Ore 5 FEC EATjl,, rL�II? 19.00 T I A pREF-InS4r} MiAL Vulu"0H R- 19.33 '1'['{,i DUE V OR r .00 p T TINA P i j T?'j i %� •� T i+r I_fliF (�, (+ {�eli'i�P{'fC C]LASS�RLL r (' Tn*r AL PREPAYS ,00 Q-TAL Vol 1 ER CH 30.00 TCT AL, DUE V IiIiOR, zL .y .a BUSIM EE jolliT4.1A-1„. - �v`;JEuF;?PTI? RE�k:3�'X1,01 /' �• 9(.)01”! ++;;3 ;} ?0 Al, rREPAIDS TOT VCL;u#cRE ?CT3iL DUE VENDOR 90: k x rITT. i1F DI AMOM RAR, RUN DATE: W15/2000 14:34=37` V[l! ER REGISTER PAGE' 12 VJE 'THRU> I'l L %�3 " PREPAID: FUND/SECT-ACCT-PRO>;ECT-ACCT PD # I OICE DESCRIPTION DATE CHECK. LO5 iu FUEL, 00,15510 745533— 1031'5 ARI 116:3 1K6TRF' WST SVr-SEPT,UOQ 1 225. ?: 0015.,3: -453?'D-- lnr ? CIfi,;1_22' c!' G,!� p,^Ili?-�-PT L!!: ` .31014 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOLICHEF ,TOTL DrErRD 111 456.47 MWILSON M LL,uTRACTOR..: INC rCr ��r 11 4�G.Pc:1C�£-:.1.0..4.•:f 4A�. 41 C_i. 10428 2463Br" FLD` iCHTC-R:TERA 1833,303. .}l) TOTAL PREPnIOS TOTAL Vr-ER: 183;J',O:) ; TOTAL DUE -VENDOR 1831303.00 MNINTE:. ,20,01-- 001,5314-4 1� 1C!1z:3 ^S • SUP PLS - IE NAGE .O" K t V, TUTPL FFEt" Il3S , TOTAL lv"OUCCHERES 127.23 TOTAL DUE ;' ENDOW - : C,qS ,4 S- 'l[T'.,.t MS 3IW TCR FROM T5 0014060- 412;''Sa98245-64 WATER SUPFLS-SUITE J, 43,13 - �n14M'4213£0-- 10331{ 5998848-t,l' E� fi��lTAt - SUITE'iF3 3,51 ' i TU A_. PF=EAIU. .y OG TOTAL `r �; PERS 56,63 10T jLC, VEMBOR 56.63 ,' T . pp�33{� LCHARTS i.,f3 `£, CisC,+y.. i3£.'i::'. 76 M.0 .., "0'r ^k�4 f 3e »';cf't` ��L�R CHAP.,, u.£:f,.>_v.,S San v -;:.£�3 TOT,^l 'E'Rs 263 � J TOTAL L€vim :fE?`DO 9.77 _ LfUA v. k:._ CI...: ILI ON MADTETC[ DMD ry!. t, . 13 TOT mss, fiR5 • 1 {s,13 TONAL DUE : L_NDOR1 7 t- Lya,, t MILLUZ s.2 7 GE1£ G rFi{ .ir PAR11K, 5 1 D. F -HER £ A.GE "+ TOT;L , rEPAILU, ,+JL TOTAL MUCH ERE 3O;s r DUE '�'Etdl£:OR LUQ>.CO r w L ;l :F111M.-NT t� sCi: Eti 4-117 AO -- 9 MULL Pttrte 'PYTG[ N' 874 „11 TGTA i £v£ REPAID .: - TOT.-_ `: i:�J HEIR �a:_;j•t�, •�1 .. TOTS ii SlE vui}: C} �4.*M ,. �T,I L''DIAi" 6AR ' FTI DATE: 111161 0 t4�*407 , �MiC EER, fiEGIST ER PAGE, I3 DU TWJ= 11/"1lMO FN .PAiil EJf'Ws:'eECT—ACC}'—:90JEvT—P,CiT I.i'�'{L�tCE � � ��'�i-�sIPTi�� y'�TE GEC! I ASC ' {r14!1.-42.i'3Cf-- Aft i°EMBF—FREVALO Ti1TAL FREPAIDS TOTAL 41t0JC.-?TEEPS TIITAL I.JE;}Jtrdli� PICNLI6hT FRESS c101„S1 r 411:1.f?�-- 'tai? 5 Si!a��IE — f�;: FUS 55.2* , \ 7 OTA PFE f IDL .00 TPf T AL VOUCHERS �', 95.2 t(tom� TOTAL DUE VEINDODIR 95.26 R"LAhM MIDURIS 0use `44i00-- T :T G1IMM-10/1245x 4 T6TAL PREPAIDIS .010 TOTAL VOLEHERS 4=,C.r ; - TOTAL "UU'E VENDOR 45.00 V t a E: LC` UNITED WAY o f K ;2 PA ROU DE U TIUN.=' F�;.9-22 ' 12.,'0 'TOTAL PREP. AIDS TOT AL MICHEIrol OTAL OLE+��EC:I?7R 11200 f G rnt�f•1t. 4 u'?-- NAACP MT6 — ANSARI 2 r :4 a; 45.00 11121/200 465522 � T ori PRUA'_J M Al 4�.# L.flf T6Tni IMIrp L TOTAL DAUE 4,00 RE a. RECREAT1ON FEW -1 ia.00 T6TA' } ERAI6S „6f1 T6 i A.L. !.'Q11t i '7t .j, TOTAL Ol. t}EP3DOR `9.6C� t t #f T i .n f NATI01NAL N'0TAiii ASSOCzAT= � 01531! 4—.5177 ERyHC 4EN"F4t 0.tVi1 31 a(0 BT TOTAL Val HERS�} aCC TnT I 6j =:jEt;rR „t, TE --ieal1': ?�7.S7dCv�I�3 ?vt'EATER. 217s14 TOTAL PRET 1IIi e� CHUG IER 217 .14 . 7T'ul'AL TO O��.=Til ifUE �iE it R Lj7yi, r r r 14T .E_ Lft=� r, i1v 9>_c 't x22210 - ." lr467 17=icr4 6tA NT T L r+-cryL !01 AL PRE3"AMS ,�(f 250. 2DO TOTAL ME VEN�}}wnR s.. '- . ,y50,r�;� = CITY OF`DIANNIt :BAF • RM DATE. 11/16/20W 14.*4.87 WIL04.ER REGISTERPA�Es 14 DUE TWU'. 11/2 /28 !? PREPAID EO; /5EC?7ACCT-SRO °ECT`ACCT " 'PO 1# I'NkjOICE ; .. DESCRIPTION AMOUNrr DATE CHECK DEBORAH O`CONNOR 0014010-4282-5-- Fi_IiE 7.t ! FsE?f"B-=EAG,IGSvi�!E ��aC':l TOTAL PREPAIL!S TOTAL VC VC i r� ' TO'EAL DUL 'END"-__. OFFICE SOLUTIONS. 0014090-413�t�3--" 1o57i 79.552 OFFICE'"5 P1-TIFE€ BITER + i1S.4 'TOTAL PRERAIDS, .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS -216.49 'TOTAL,I.DUE VENDOR , 216a49 PACIFIC TIME RECORDER' 0014040-422007- 1 702 REPAIR, SiiGS-TINE GLa- 402{y ;.," 89 TOTAL PREFAIDS ., rt�U q _ -_, ..TOTAL .4'CUCi'lR5 -,. TOTAL DLE VENDOR 182.89 PARCEL POST iff-2e0451c=-- 1t�519 PRINT SVCS-HLDY RIDE'PLf '205 S''' TOTAL PREFAIOS TOTAL VOUCHERS 205.b° TOTAL BUE tei:,,.OR ' `,)Or 68 �_ PIRT F 390-6' RECREATION RtFUNO - :1 3 t TOTAL F EPRI lS TOTAL , EUir� D€E «ERsiGDR 120.00 WITH f - PP 23 ; ;AYROLL Tr, �IN! ..FES-PP`;':c 7c 000.f.0 1!/-41t �,.00 PP23 TOT �L c`EFar Tn 7:.��'"�r6D TOTE F)[jlt(E ♦1�tiLi s(�]]c� {9 r .3 TAT 11 3,."— _4 fk ; • i VioCfo. i�'+. TE•: ::: Pp' 3-22 NOV .HEALTH 16 c PR`MrS 11;828.62" 11 /1/2000 4,`'4 i. : ,(• f 4 ( - .:� PF21-2,.I LE 59 14 hi4E 4AL u T!"!TS G�EPAIDSI t 937 --FF TOTI1. 'V C�!�Rr TOTAL DUE VENDOR 127$$7r76. r � REr ;E#, E FUND, s : �iiCf9-- PP2_ RE?TIRE COP?TRIL"Er" i 695r99 11/21[2000 4��1 - ",iJ-241:F__ - F' , a -SUR"iNOR DENIER' 40 20 46,02 4 ylts__ oc 3_ RETIRE CMITIRIE r S,DLr,Q 'f1/r1/L'8Q!I 46!02 T�'T{sL FREPAIDS, nT7 n7 TOTF 4fOL�iEtttbF� a{JV €OTS DUE Y;ENEDOR 8,203.97 -CITY -.Br' 1AMOND SAF RUN GATE. 11116, 000 1434.37 I{ "0MiER F.EGISTER PAGE 15 £f THR+.1= W21,12000 PREPAID f1XIII'SEOT-P,M, T -PROJECT -ACCT ; PO # INVDICE >LESGRIPTION ASEEMI DATE I EC. Pahi0m 'Llrmc A' LISTRICT AUG 00, PARKINIG.CITATN FEE -Alii Ori M.00 TOTAL PFEPAII45 .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1495.00 TOTAL DUE VEETIM 29'5.00 =, POSTMASTER 001-23010-- E105ESS ?SAIL - FISIL 00-31 11.7E ' EMPRESS MAIL- FPL CEO , 11,75 001-2301 0— hlA.t - FFL OU -11 111.75 001-23010— EYPRESS MAIL - FPL 00-31 11.7 001-23010— E#FR=S" 1-14IL - FPL 00-11: 11.75' 001-23010— DUPRE% MAIL - FPIL 00733 11.7: TCI7AL PF AIDS TOTAL 4OUGiEF8 7{3,50 TOTAL CLUE VENDOR 70.50 FRIOR RECEDU CESS INC t E L t „ua... 0-011535 42340 - M TFLE PEC! JWi R, 7MFRilJRf; TOTAL PREPA;r,S ,00 - TOTAL kXUCHIERS 195.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR . 195. LSO C! t T „ tC`G -��-•• - {3SEI .. io-_ 4vv PROFMCI v -FPS. 9:-24 CF sOC3 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 ?TFLWEEK-) -.tr,''.�I�1 TOTAL I?LE `; EI~a"nR 57.00 ,t 1LIESUT TES 44' 1 423,41 Pne—MAN''R�N L�MIp GxY.R 8012 - TOT "L F.'{E��`�AIIOS .ptEO TOiAA. VLLL �� I� is iE 786.80 E O € ESL €rt+E VENDOR' 7u,., s 0 vv a"Ca VyiPRINT„tiv J IR C:A A P}L JF e e7iv_vJuJS Vo d7516PRINT MCS MM PS vla7 ; Lx•1 fcH TOTAL VOUCHERS 162.vo Tl � B':_E -VE �LQJF4 i a Jri .,. ' -.555 'iiv�!rY=J- E: (Ckjv ,t" 'SL —.7=5—r v<";L - iE. i}t Cr4 }.r.j�.,v y' 61 D; ,-- :r•�j�'�y r- .r 71 J 1040-646060 W'va LIL�r�iSL€: 13• F J �R}Li r. ,�15 Life: E TOTAAI L :-EF;-P Ti : 00 " _ .— .. x sj#�,} Mir nn 553.20 CITY BF I11AMND I RUN DATEI 11116I2N)OO 1$`,3,34.1? . tVDiERR REGISTER PAGE, I W (� DUE. THRW 11t211G FREPAM —FUND/SECT -ACCT -PROJECT-ACC-1 FU II`"'t:;ICE DESCR, P-1 Ind AMOLN, DATE CHECK FEL} -mso%; I.AnrTE 1 _ _ •_ L,fr 4t -- i 0134 CONTRACT CLASS-Fkl L 49.001 �-1,. 1� ) �i,� _ v :• 104i2 D±4 E Rt7t- I aeLAvty SUIM! Et1 _ -.. 1051.00 (1015 is -1115-200-- 10411 CONTRACT CLAS&FALL 19. 00 TOTAL :'REPAI v- .00 TOTAL �10UCHCCR 6 t r TOTALDUE- VENDOR 273, 00 PEI114 EFGER PRINT€ ORR.K. W INC +1arr r1_z: 0n-omSUt _,.ES_ CITY ENVE,ei-tS t t� ._1ii.0 TCT"! F?EPAID-S .00 TUBE VUFJ_XC R. 1�6.51. _ TnTAL DUE VENEBOR' I x.51 jACQUELINEE RE-THI uI [? ..t'-?;f`1.•E-- (} p }�� a{-'560 RECREAT I4:V REFUND ;70a11{i-.. S T CITAIL FREE IDS 0 TD I A� tF OUCHERS .. 29.00 T[TA! DILIE VENDOR - .4I,031 REM E21 Y 0014-40 146-40-440-)- AIEl5 0 y c,qLr_C./CLP,, £01115 S 781 TF! 627.20 A 10 513 544 EMP SVC6-is0 0, 10'1018 51_.52. i'- ' .�1E1{.. ; 22c?:,g.°.i. 4i s ET Clft– f _Fi,If{t 1 :.: q 14. Yf 9 3 X{ 10496 19149 ,i5 TEMIP S3CS — C/CLRh tkK10{1 l,09,65; 1 Tva A. FC°Epi TG . } T ALL DUE V94DOP 14'A'i"-- 5xC LC'*H 47 92 L r�' �tvtE2,900 inJrEG:t vi ar It�i__ 1?I'Ln i_C'arL--r1"v AUDIT SEPT '43 50 "01-1-C-00-44020— -' 1st t�.e`?'._Av Vii'}... LE„�.,a�§ar_ SVGS eLFiib- G, �,`'T.,e•i { tjs>•,..tt $"A�''j–_ - 11.12 i-�. A Cy;,.u–G51� S�Ev3 r:EF'T- 2,?14. ii. 11s�rJ 4 LFG, 5.'CS r1PL AUG r n� ,, T LEGAL * SUES HIES JULY :13.45: 111290 FGAL SVCS F,1u WKS SEPT 1 0, 7.5Cf' {aI} 14}y 3 4 3y is-- 11128e LEGA LVMu rM vVCS ,, 0.05 _ 000 40200-44021— 1 —�: LE!. S' SL" ?TE Nfl i SEPT29.50 TOTAL F'cGAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS IL LSE VENDOR BOB ROSE a y.r�r0 4,1 30-- REIMB—HIALLOWEEN SUPPL--S 86.69- TOTAL F^Err TDS . }C} TLTAL VOUCHER T: 'CITY OF DIAMOND PAP: RM DATA=' 11/1612CO 14:=34 -;?7 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE- 17 DUE TMU. 11,2112OWN '.. PREPAID} AM FO • IT :OIC= IESC°IFTIO`r} AMUNT DATE raC. .n; 0015210-42320— SCACEO rr} FLB ES 11;4 60aT TOTAL PREPAI S TOTAL VOUCHERS 60.00 TOTAL DUE `=rRI 0a. -:..0r. J• vi MIS '110 x } .- t}15'�1. OF -'T O,, FUEL - C�i�? DEV. GCT: .:55.52 QCC T 00 FUEL - PUBLIC MOR'S OCT 57.50 OCT W FLIE - fC/MAMAIGER OL } c;. A.3 TOTALFfi�PrIOS TOTAL- AL S,Fuuui '- 372.51 TOTAL DUE VV4MI R =?<,51 SANLAbR". EL-Sr7LLEI 3RI'Eq iliiE _ C2922 PUBHRS LLE G 52.68 T071X1,;Pr ITIS TOTAL (�[� TO Al DUEV E�RDOP 8 .6r L !y ((-- ESLL�IA S;-NrHLL. _ --tt RECREATION ..86; 755 RECREATION REFUND REFUND { JxJ e:l •1 TL�TAL FREP TI a0. TOTAL t� l rIEFS 38.00 TOTAL r�lt VENDOR 38,00 t: K40 SUPPLE-LIALLOWEEN TOT1i_ PREPrt€DSOTAL ,4 j VOM TMAL AL DUE VEN3JU1•{'' 11ti; s y{ t _ . 14t 55 vu, PLat 31CC, .CtS F ,.Li."i 45. (fi1 TOTALP EFnIDS }�:TAL 10DUCHERS TfT_ �� V BOOR r IMA EBRIIINM 39 KCREEAT 074 ION REET LIN El 5 'o nllS, TOT" " �j�.:UrDHs: RS c L4 aRi0 R ` TOTAL DUE t 3lO � � (Y) SC- 'RITY R t —A�-- n ' 99J x 11.f'Fi '~'iJ`JY2ER 2YsC hi ti l}`.� :; 1 1198.00 nr •jTisi3 it. Prl" Y' E ROM CM 19A TOT"L Oi?L t,EjtT3OP 9aaer" 001 -23002— 2 EF RE UND PK DEP-PEASAN' 50.00 TOTAL F EEHiC� ,i10 TOTAL t3OiUCHEF S MAL DUE'EPS DIIR. tiTy Ti tIAPOND BAR RLIN DATE: 11J16J?DDCi 14=34.37 WJCHER REGISTER ¢ v� ` ..ACC 1� ITE THRJ: 1111':112000 ri3PiU,'v�CTTo -AC�.T PRD',:=C? -ACTT. 1 i] Pt I `d�1 i � DE " TP+ IO EC£Tiz, T. ? _ AMOUNT DAT;: - CHECK 01 .17 u�7n7 RUREiRTION PFUND 45.00 TOTAL PFEPA1DS ,CSD DUl TONAL c:LE lVEN OR 45.00 EIL't-,A� MAINTENIAtrCE INCOR P CR TED 015554 4,5(07-- 1!�?9-a i�%��it T� �f� SGL t�At� �'�I C' 0015554-45517 _ 107124 Tp FC 56NL MAINT-�DCT DO i100,00 37,74 0015,954 el5t". _ i i" 1f)7._`-� TRrFC .�l;2';i i.iij�1T_!1�`j' t;tj' 127,16 Cl i 155 C7 107825 TRIFtCP— i'lAI iNIT -T 00 x"4,71 +'•D 554 ' Er : 10 7}r255 N TP�FC G to MA-DCT Cn 294.37 ooffL gr-5j 011n 10313 - 1075?7 TRFFC &rNL"14.'s?�?T-DCT 0* 44.00_ TOT, nL PREPAIDE .00 OTAL lU-JCHER'R2, 5; a92 TOT, AIL BNE, VENDOR ; 2,907.' - gt.AP T & FINAL . n5C'S�1c ,airy -- 1255215-41200-" 00 5LPP'L-ESR PROGRAM DIhgDD . � yttea� _ 0015150 412N- SjE -? n A' PREPAIDS .00 Tt3T'L VD? CHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR. `?5.°? -J •?c .50-4 ,.?-.-t ifir CLASS-FALL. 1.26.00- REPIDSTD €L .{) , VOL ARE 16.0{p ?OTAL I;Jt: DCI'OR 126. 00 2hi y t EMITH K , 0. NP-Tot"I 40.0f 40. 00 TL,� R? �'{;E VENDOR., 3 a,, - - ME: FRILP1, t?TC-D:IRGr c 30 D) ? , r4 1e 20'? 4459� ti i T 7A_ =..;.E! AIDE # _.J,:)f) TGTA AL t TOTAL DUE �r'ENDDR 010 ? ,1-- ;. TIOPN ;EF ND 80 TD7TFA�._ F? E; AIDq .00 T-, l Vol RS Pi. : TOTAL D E TEND n, y v.(N CITYlF _DIAMI&M BAF -UN DATE: 11.116r 00 i4.?a}: 7 VOPIR REGISTER�tiuE: ly DUE TIM 11121/2 W PREPAID. Ft ND/SECT-ACCT-PllMJECT-ACCT PC 'iniVDTCE : DESCE?TPTI 4P "` nT^,CC1NT DATE CFECK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EuiSSIN 13:55351-421'26-- 11ECT Ss XS -DIET �39 24,..6'' y 14155341 421'26-- :DC�41 416 E�Et 3 SVCS - DIST 4i 12 9.61 015,14-42126-- 0015,14-42126-- ELECT S;#Gi-!;E€sTACE 774.01. t� 155-42,26-- (10115 y�li��SSSD_x �' L # SVCS - TRFFC CTI°L_2. 71, 0015510-4212k6-- ELECT WCS-TRFFC CMTRCL" 13.63 00115510-42126- - 2147972046 ELECT SVGS'TRFFC'CC'�tt TRL 156.24 %st:c 1 4.i26-- EL CTSLS TRFC CONTROL 7.75 0 15:2 4211 :.6^- E? FC 4x7SIL5 - 1 x n s r. . 001531 342126-- ELEC NES HEriTACE L 1554214 1 ?,.�s�-- 1554 1"' ELECT S�CS_LTST41 - `�15;22 4'12-_ ELECl SVR REMAIN' �A1 O'.,2v7i - n16` "1'015328-42126— ELECT SVr,--, Et'-M.MITRIIGE �55 f1i15311.14n1=t:: - ELECT 5tPLmaw �1v 001531 4126=- y.E Hl 44,C7EL�+�St 4 01-015-3:19-42126- - E ECT EVCS PETE ON 1 253.51. 1 ;` ELECT SVCS-SYC CYN Pt'. phi 71 D 1C'1r 4i1..— ELECT;F�3t-fir � D,+ -• ter, TOTAL xR-'AIDSITAL TO xr.. i�.q{{V.ii -TGTAL DUE .#END 6,7 0.22 11ARK ST AALR T 5 TOTAL PREF;TDS Q{hti TOTAL VOUCh TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR 45.00 STANDARD 7Ntj'I`4.A C OF GRE, 6fl,''-.. NVY LIFE INS ?FESS 63$!_5 i0 11/21 2000 4t 05 TOTALC ECAIDS .Vb.60 ` T�?TA i � rCHE�j _, TO AL as—i.i ._:iJ TOT DUE t R iLi''i.., Lie_ +E�DCn' ,s xn 7 ERLIN HO EL _4 : • _ xie-- LA'-'#"�?tnt a.7r, 11t,1: ..•. { 2x.0 6:n 46 D <: -TOTAL PRE. AIZ6 -323-7 TOTAL V0051 o'1ERS •� ,a TAL DUE vtNDM My. 76 ' SUB, Ay fq } ! 1 1 i, __ Ct i z= �{::. ,.Y�.�*i'� f c 10/26 1 ;r5 0 4, t9 ^}+.325-- 0014090-4 10:'1']_ iy�?J��ai MIS SLi ` L - CClJ� MIS - nr 1 510_ 42325- 10219 i'rL .lin 13T sIJPa L.vJ Ors. .. tav{i, tii i Rl :FF: ,� 19.95 ' r , '1 rtii SLrPLv-CC;+1,Ctu CTS i1,� TOTAL. PREPAIDS; rx . D4 - TOTAL VOUCHERS 55.86 TOTAL DUE VENDDP �J•J cC 8 v s CITY EDF DIAP RUN DATE. 11/16/20W 14.34:37 VOUCHER REGISTER PACE. 20 ME 91 M, 11;/ 1 /aa <' " FUNDI EEET—AC�'T—PROJECT—A;CT FG - INVOICE DESCRIPTItONASC PREPAID Ft�fa INT DATE, Ul15SUTEL EMT, ON 014-03C 4 0-o-- LOCCE COM DO E 715.20 42Ew�°-- LOrn COIY C�sA�t3G,HtPPERA' 1,43.4ta ff�CT� p RE TOTAL iOU ERS 2,145.x.€ TOTAL DUE VENDOR ;145 ,n 2'145,60 I RMAS G TOBY fir JJ 0 'TRACT C# —FA1 t} lcl.tv�Vr vt1 TOTAL PREFAI S TOTAL VOM ERS 150.00 TOTAL LUE VENO l�ty n{y �AtrGE1 TELENTINO 5126 F;EPUPdE PK DEP—PETEPEEfi r,.Qt�' v TOTAL PREPAIDS aU ® - TOTAL 4'GrUCHERSS 50.00 TOTAL Ls1i VE III 50. GO TCS L t hA:.:. EErt L,: Pt tflyt r Ir ADDI AINt 3 i ITF:OCT tx T, '` rS31r30^ S 1" j,�;.f 1 L 1 s.::ttetf: Jtsr:.: : P1ra S Al"ll MAIN �, It�YS ityl — `S r,JWIs?E I"?Ihdl "APLE OCT 708.I0 fft tl! jl!_– t'r, �,L�..n, – t7 2 �2 11 , L,_ P `i B : 488.00 si 3t __ :�rfcc AG'EL ' INT "3L CYC! >?ET 1011.-51? 0.tC i.s 9 tet. _ r. � E AIDE MINT OCT 601.$9 � it ,� i – t+u�4Ji#V. :SrnL li`r7;tdT !�'ETFREOt!:! C i.J 3iJ ' 1 ti T IF m M -F PANTL A OCT 2, 563. 5 .t. -, 3a � t ME 1t MAJ P �.�vGOCT 7 1,4°�.,4 Csf s:` D `1"SsARN '61 `iif� �� {' r"!'f' 1('F L: t L '3i3 kF CAW'l M. r 4llxia—or OCT ? lt5•i �y': 7y;� / ,s LL. tif;: �dT a:iv U1i�L "iL `L•i'.: 101 _,ji }-7qp In 5539 A c -- 1 s.,z!>i �' {'FhI]ii'I}IuI.: 3 vuT U.a9";z'ta;3i# ti 93 �1 �f ?IIS* PA1NT RE€�GAN DE l x38.5° ' 4-4�r 10 7 _ 2218 911rt8 'irCr t tiOCT ' a 00 141115 S 5C::-- - ir9trE jL ,,S.l 0.50 . 00 TOTAL PREPAID {} .�1 TOTAL VOi HERS 23,329.64 TOTAL'DUE VENDOR aza4 ;+ NI _D ! ! 4ES POSIL =E .:t ICE t } ..rti +-- 42 —0 REALEMISH PO'ETAGE METER- 2,000.00 TOTAL FREPAIDS .00 TGiT°5_ VO'jCHERS 2 ai7Q:4O T3EAL DUE VES DOR i,tx O,[, a vi11 c:-.33,, i:., .ra_.Lr._ _. 001510-120—: 15 10 121 - BUSINEM RELY MAIL �1 ltizj,(jCt SPGS AEE REE' EATION GUIDES ?,�v:1t�4} TOTAL, RUAIDS, . .tau a TO ` CITY 'OF DIAMOND RAR =. N DATE=?I;�IuMOC 14=34*7 WMER DREOMIUS FAuE= '?? E Mu 31J21/?0? EFEF`AiL - F;,#ND SECT- #L i-?'' aruT i„ Al I xVOIiE iLS�t T Y .... -?f<.' i AHLANT 1.Lit TTi. L'I`—ur.•`•: ..'c _ . VERIMINI SRLIF A <t•�:liCi i:��.,_`•_?`_ ��rr LL aa;�'� L�++ Th i4 L 7if:4�9 FIitV[nB7E, :; t FtYLp fs87 .glia Ut,g53'4 421225-- 909- 65680 FHaS CS '?ERITAC-E COMM CTR F°Y-L'BRAF: ROJECT 128.51 0010,40-4- -- - —37,720 aa� eYr x r 5...-�t!�it�E•y��t' �. �0 [�qq {(� F� 0014010 421125-- amu:•:,- {FSH �C+'i{�L^n� T�Fr' :' •�:P1 F�i'�a NY'.�.S-11C +Fs1 L14iYm 26. 76 001 0900 it 212e — 90�. � � � � _;, ,. 27 19 4.78. TOI IA F L 'FE -PAH .00 T T OTAL ' OUC IEF. I. 2, 474 a 44 TOTAL WE VENDOR x-04.44 ALAN 1IROtAF. v1` Mil :2 r 45 001 TOTAL MEMOS—.00 TCTA'._ T:a1E VEM:OR . ? a0C , 4 ftyt —21 M1111— �yyi�. ' Ili.F4 ION'T °REh�TU�15. :�{,Yi,. 43 11" tF.i 2000 46594- •r -#T;A! CFI ".Ei''n#.#5 T. 091 .4?, IN AL APOUCHIERS TOTAL Fly'"EItI#OR c 0—RE�iva43 n ` W fu i= _ �'T 2,01-0— T50-41 y REiV,B-HA# E� OttEEN SUF�PLS _ 45.1' . F- T Al FREPAIDS a00 �+ TLYTAL YC'UrHERu TOTAL WE Y�E�?vOR 45,3 ^,I#T VALLEY ILy.e.r."s J-:�,nT_S,T o ,53,5, 42£.4`3=- ��,, rt n+^ yc.St r` T E,! 4= FELIT" z FST. L-5EFT MT Cs3 4 36fi.(1r, TC ML ,#CJCHERS 4 368.00- TOTAL L#11 ENICR 1i_ 3aj1C ER M WATER v SCJ R RtF Ata i'rK 3, q Z �,:; ME -42126— F42 — - D IS IST lk{"[i E Jivv�°• Y�LF? :Y� -8.50 '14,�:4a� . PRE�r PREP OT"' ra,TliS - #ir1E�aL .ls�l,i :tel' 24,1 1, TOTAL LAIC M Llat_A5 'RUN DATE: 11/16/2000 14134:37 VDIDS REGISTER PnCE. 22 FiJPdr�/SrCT—ACCT—PROJECT— aC T FO # PREPAID INMICE DESCRIPTION AMOLNF°'` DATE, CHECK NELLEFARGO MNK ' 001 40'0-4rjifl--FE1EL — ICSC 26.31 , 2i/2000 46590 0014010-42125-- GiinOS . 2N�^ 46590 kE MENTION UPPLIES 270.50 11/�1/2000. 4- 00140 0 4 _2: --(?' — B LAIIGER i' #.f�sf� 4w591 00#40°0-42•'_==-- NTGS —.STAFF/C1 495.95.11/21/2000 4591 0014411 41232;-- i"TG —` LLiG ,flr #t4.i?0 ii;': i/ 000 46- r9 ' 0140x0 4'y�€j- i �#A CLONIF-CMIGR BOYL E,ARVi.. 574M2 iirzi1 000 4F.,5=91 001433 aF-20 —— LEEP,LREIIT`LPIA:CardF-C4 —b.Sf40 13/1i/GOLD. 4�9k ;!i=14G33L} 4i 3O__LEAG CQ F-GCIiLE,R �'L,Ta B, 1,44�e3C, 11/21/2000 ':46F, ra0140;?5414I0-- P i'mo �;PPLG—EsEL ! -ER iis,5#'ii/zl/2C 4659 1 ' 001403Ir 42KO-- I SC Ct F` f',i54.30 11/21/2000 '4 591 r '=14[J 0 4 "5-- ORAL :€s�J€wl, SR ACCT CLY �' 31,66 11/21/200 `4559`? . . 0V14010 4` 330-- ' � i :. . NAT, LLAti-,ERRERA 1C11� __,615.0,011/21120W N: 0014030-42330-- ICf1i CG#vF-BELANCIEf 16.1 '11/21/2 , 46591 r40#40L`3 45'40-- CITY ?M—PALM NET 4G7.ii;k1/2i/�?00 46599- ;14� #0 4 2' -- - N€aTL 'LEAAG-CRAM, i0/i 1 615 D0 1112112000 '46586 . 0014030 4�i 5- PAL,*F_T'SVCS—BELANGER _' 10.38 11/2112000 465911 '`� OOI A (} 4�� 1r3- FLzEL — BELAh 413 �i :. f 108x14 11/2#� 000 46591 F. ` O0,i4'aiC 42325.— MITGE—HUFF;9/ib �1.55'1#121/200�1 .46,587 00140110`42330-- APTA COW -i31f1iFF1=°,2C 1`48.;32 11/.21/:(us. 46G7 #``'#,423-30--JTY Cs7�dF—Ai1R?7.E0 11 121/2(M:. 4658$ E �' 1 's' 4 MTGS / AS�ti i,i l- -11/2000 0 10 14 010 42 NTGS NEF,ER t4 -46538 _ 001411. 42'5, UNCL SPE..CO4gNTu—PGS i4�.0(a 11 �#/2a00, 46,x.99 SRT NRTG TRI MS OCOaNI-1;,, 79,40 1112112Ga04 . 46590 �Z#__-- PALs'11ET SVCS r OCONNOR 10.0 11/21/2000 . W9,0 �r f C "M1t 171t'�i �v TM L_ L. � ' 67.21 t _ TOTAL ;;0L1L (X TCT(;.. LXX V— OR 6 17, ; ' i 7 .,3JR�C 0131- Fi3'.PTO SPPLS — PLAU41EE —TAX TOTAL PRE°AIDS ,00 O TA TL SFO? �_HZ TOTAL 'tiJE VENTSF{ :•' 2'�n c T COASTARBOR I STS TM 1` ;° 19'=i1 ADDI TREE SAINT—SEPT #?iti 1t3 }�C . 01015558-4551 o- i a� i`v�71a—A TREE NATER AUG 00 :60,00 `s .5_ 45510-- s z0 w_t , c N �_ a . _ TREE WATERING—SEPT n0 ;?6(a,r�rl �a1 3t, �'�� 10`081- 13^.55 TREE PLA'43TING S',at��StPT 0{i 85.00 4C 3-- isa02 IScA ,. i,404O _UKflJ8 Q015555L-455kt— {�}(� :y Kfj`i fl _ is h Flit. i , TR "1AIPdT-AU(� 430 10,`6"0. ' (atD. M58 -45510-- 11 1C 311 ilial ( Cn �� 3^— ADDIL TRLG WA: ERANu' tiCPTt C' _ TOTAL F -s.PAM Th , `,1 C• U. �LHER 14,s f TOTS DaUE VEMOR 147309arara , e• A'WEST x_ s 1`015250-41200— KIMEf-4 ALLOWEEN SUPPLS 139.2: TGTA" Pr,EPr,iaa5' Ora '10 A'_ Mu"CHLRS1" r 9 n7 TOTAL EUE VENDOOR 139.22 I CITY OF BAR Ft. DATE= 1111612000 14134:37. 4OLEHER REGISTER PAGE. 23 11JE Tit3=. 11211�DQ0 . FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJEDT-ACCT PD -# IkiVDICE DESCRIPTION'AMCpJlVT PREPAID DATE CHECK YOSEMITE WATERS 0015310742130-- 10277 OCT191M M RENTA1-PARES - Or 12.0 001 5310-42130- 10277 SELP191 9A EG RE11TA'L-PARKS ' tu`D<1 00 12.00 TOTAL PFEPAIDS _ TOTAL DUCHERS 24.00 TOTAL DLE VEMBOR 24,00 ROBERT ZEEMAN 0111!-347 4f 3:76=24 RECREATION REF'UM.0 2C 0 TOTAL PR AIDS TOTAL 'VOUCHERS 20.00 TOTAL rLUIE VENDOR, 20.00 REPORT TOTAL PREPAILS f }`_. eyp r� REPORT TOTAL VOUfiERS 353,y44.F. FtiFO T iUt ifVJffsii44' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City. Council MEETING DATE: November 21; 2000 REPORT DATE: November 14, 2000 FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager TITLE: Exoneration of Subdivision Improvement Bonds for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading, Domestic Water System, Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation Improvements for Tract 48487. SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Diamond Bar entered into agreement dated October 20, 1995, with subdivider, Windmill' Development/C&A Developers, to complete various improvements for Tract 48487. The subdivider guaranteed faithful performance of this agreement by posting various surety bonds with the City.. The subdivider later amended the Tract 48487 improvement plans and consolidated them with Tract 50314 with the intent to simultaneously install all improvements for both subdivisions, which then resulted in the posting of new consolidated bonds. The new consolidated bond amounts are now posted under Tract 50314 in which the City of Diamond Bar entered into agreement dated April 18, 2000. The subdivider now requests the exoneration of the original bonds for Tract 48487.' RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended' that the City Councilapprove the exoneration of Subdivision Improvement Bonds for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading, Domestic Water System, Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation Improvements for Tract 48487. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Resolution _ Bid Specification _ Ordinance Other: Agreement EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? XN/A _Yes No 1 Does the report require a majority vote? Majority _ Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X N/A Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X' N/A _ Yes No-, Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X N/A _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: James DeStefano D id Liu Interim City Manager r 0 Director of Public Works i CITY COUNCIL REPORT . AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, interim City Manager SUBJECT: j •. Exoneration of Subdivision Improvement Bonds for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading; Domestic Water System, Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation Improvements for Tract 48487. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of Subdivision Improvement Bonds for Landscape & Irrigation, Grading, Domestic Water System; Sewer, Storm Drains & Streets, and Monumentation Improvements for Tract 48487. FINANCIAL SSUMMARYc This action has no fiscal impact on the City. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Diamond Bar entered into agreement dated October 20, 1995, with subdivider, Windmill Development/C&A Developers, to complete various improvements for Tract 48487. The subdivider guaranteed faithful performance of this agreement by posting various surety bonds with the City. The subdivider later amended the Tract 48487 improvement plans and consolidated them with Tract 50314. It is the intent of the subdivider to simultaneously install all improvements for both subdivisions. The subdivider therefore posted new consolidated bond amounts for Tract 48487 and Tract 50314•to replace the original bond amounts for Tract 48487. The new consolidated bond amounts are now posted under Tract 50314 in which the City of Diamond Bar entered into agreement dated April 18, 2000. The original bonds with their respective bond numbers for Tract 48487, whichhave been superseded, are as follows: Landscape & Irrigation = $185,000.00 (Bond No. 18474 IS) Grading = $630,000.00 (Bond No. 184'743S)` Domestic Water System $132,000.00 (Bond No. 184742S) Sewer, Storm Drains, Streets = $602,000.00 (Bond No. 1847445) Monis nentation $ 2,000.00 (Bond No. 184745S) The subdivider now requests the exoneration of these original bonds for Tract 48487. See attached letter dated November 6, 2000. Prepared by: David G. Liu I John L. Ilasin LLC Windmill, Inc. 3480 Torrance Blvd,, Ste. 340 Torrance, CA 90503- (� we`d 113 P 2 • . telephone (3T 0) 540-3930. facsimile (310) 316-7133 November 6, 200Q City of Diamond Bar Mr. Jim DeStefano, Deputy City Manager 21660 E. Copley Drive, Ste. 120 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 RE: Release of obsolete subdivision bonds - Tract 48487 Dear Jim, On 1/31/2000, I wrote to you and Mr. Wentz ( copy enclosed) regarding the posting of consolidated subdivision improvement bonds for Tracts 48487 and 50314. I enclosed new bond nd estimates from Hunsaker & Associates and Craig Weber & Associates, setting forth the new numbers for the aggregate improvements, and requesting their approval for incorporation into the Subdivision Agreement. The matter was delegated to Rose Manella, who coordinated with the City Attorney, and the new, consolidated bond numbers were approved, with the City Attorney modifying the Subdivision Agreement to accommodate both tracts (see Rose's fax to me of 3/13/2000 enclosed). I -had requested that the old, obsolete improvement bonds for Tract 48487 be released at the same City Council hearing wherein the new subdivision was approved, but this apparently did not happen. We are now in the position of having two sets of bonds outstanding for the same subdivision improvements with respect to tract 48487, and the rather substantial renewal premiums, are due. Could you please set the release of those bonds enumerated in the enclosed 1/31/00 letter for the first possible Council hearing? Please call me directly if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kurt Nelson Windmill Development " Windmill Development 3480 Torrance Blvd., Ste. 300 Torrance CA 90503 � telephone (310).540-3990 facsimile (310)316-7133 January 31, 2000 Mr. James DeStefano Mr. George Wentz Deputy City Manager RICA City of Diamond Bar 398 So. Lemon Creek Dr. 21660 E. Copley Dr., Ste. 120 Suite E Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Walnut, CA 91789 RE: Subdivision Bonds, Tracts 48487 and 50314 Gentlemen, As you know, we have amendedthe improvement plans for previously recorded Tract 48487, and consolidated them with VTM 50314, as the two subdivision will share the grading and all other infrastructure, which will be installed simultaneously: I have therefore provided Hunsaker & Associates with the Subdivision Agreement and subdivision bond figures already of record for Tract 48487, and had them make new consolidated bond estimates for the two tracts. I would like to replace the existing bonds for Tract 48487 with these new, consolidated bonds. Enclosed are the new bond estimates from Hunsaker (and from Craig Weber with respect to landscaping) for your review. For your convenience, I've also enclosed a copy of the original subdivision agreement. The existing bond Nos. and amounts are: Landscape & Irrigation - $185,000.00, Bond No. 1847415 Grading improvements - $630,000.00 Bond No. 184743S Domestic Water System $132,000.00, Bond No. 184742S Sewers, Storm Drains/ Streets - $602,000.00, Bond No. 184744S Monumentation $ 2,000.00 Bond No. 184745S According to our engineers, the original sewer, storin drain and street improvement bond amount must have included some of tract 47851's improvements, which makes sense since they were necessary for the development of the LaPeter Tract 48487. It appears that we in effect bonded twice for those improvements. Now that the 47851 offsites are completed, even the aggregate estimates for those particular improvements to serve 48487 and 50314 along' Windmill Drive total less than the original. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 13,20'00 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Award of Contract for Inspection Services for the Installation of Play Equipment at Longview North Mini -Park SUMMARY: If the City Council awards a contract for the installation of the play equipment at Longview North Mini -Park (also on the agenda for this City Council meeting), then it will be necessary to secure the services of an inspector. D&J Engineering is currently under contract with the City of Diamond Bar as the provider of these services. D&J Engineering has been the inspector for several successful play equipment installation projects in Diamond Bar, including Maple Hill Park, Peterson Park, Ronald Reagan Park and Heritage Park. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is 'recommended that the City Council award a contract for inspection services for the installation services of the play equipment at Longview North Mini -Park to D&J Engineering in the amount of $4,225, plus a contingency amount of $425 (10%), for a total authorization of $4,650, and authorize. the Interim Cit Manager to ex City g ecute the purchaseorder for said amount. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS - Staff Report Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) X Other: Proposal for Inspection Services X Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:, SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? X Yes _ No 2 Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No What Commission? Parks and Recreation Commission 5 Are other departments affected by the report? — Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REV WED B James DeStefan Bob gose Interim City Man ger Community Services Director i r _ PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION *ADMINISTRATION .556 N. Diamond Bar Blvd. #108, Diamond Dar, CA 91765 u a^„ r Phone (909) 396-6984 • Fax (909) 396-7634 E :, l { ! e.mail: djeng@clubnet.nec ft t N Y`4 iT tea i October 30, 2000 Mr. Bob Rose Director, Community Services City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 170 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Re: Inspection Services for the installation of Tot Lotequipmentat Longview. North Mini- Park. Dear Mr_ Rose.- Per ose:Per your requests, D&J Engineering is pleased to submit this letter of proposal for li inspection services for the Longview North Mini -Park Tot Lot: D&J Engineering proposes the following scope of services; 1. Provide field inspection of construction to verify work is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications: 2. Interpret the approved plans and to assure the field changes (due to soils conditions, and topography) meet approved standard construction methods. Changes requiring extra work and change orders will be brought to the attention of the City Project Manager for review and; approval: 3. Review progress payment requests before approval by the City: 4. Prepare project punch list for items needed to be completed by the contractor prior to acceptance of the work. S. Provide the Project Manager Daily Inspection Update. In addition, keep Project Manager apprised of any site construction concerns. 7. Attend meetings with designer and contractor. Proposal to provide inspection services for Longview North Tot Lot Page 2' FEE SCHEDULE The total not to exceed estimate fee is based on the estimated time required to complete each task as shown. Should additional time is required, the City will be notified and additional compensation will be requested at the time and material rates shown on the attached schedule of hourly billing rates: Field inspection: Inspector - 3 hours/20 days 60 hours @ $65.00/hr. =$ 3,900.00 Construction meeting ,(pre -construction, etc.) .5 hours @ $65.00/hr. _ $ 325.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED NOT TO EXCEED FEE: $ 4,225.00 Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (909) 396-6984. Very truly you , D A. go, C.-B.O. 7 ngineering PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract to DMG-Maximus, Inc.to provide Executive Recruitment Services for the position of City Manager. DATE: November 15, 2000 ISSUE STATEMENT: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND': This report requests approval of a Professional Services Agreement with DMG-Maximus, Inc. to provide professional executive search services necessary to assist the City in its efforts, to recruit and screen candidates for the position of City Manager. It is recommended that the City Council approve an agreement between the City and DMG-Maximus, Inc. in the amount of $23,500.00, authorize a contingency amount of '$1,500.00 and allocate the necessary resources ($25,000) from General Fund reserves. On October 17, 2000, City Manager Terrence L. Belanger resigned his position in order to commence employment as City Manager for the City of Yorba Linda. The City Council accepted the resignation of Mr. Belanger, appointed James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, as the Interim City Manager. The Council directed staff to solicit proposals from executive search firms in order to assist the City in its efforts to recruit and select a new City Manager. City staff requested proposals from nine executive search firms. The City received the proposals for review on October 27, 2000 (proposals on file). The proposals were reviewed by a subcommittee comprised of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and Interim City Manager. On November 14,' 2000 the City `Council concluded interviews with Bob Murray and Associates; Perry and Associates; and DMG-Maximus. Upon conclusion of the interviews the City Council' directed staff to formalize an agreement with DMG-Maximus for consideration' at the November 21, 2000, City Council meeting. The work ,program and budget for all tasks necessary to conduct the executive search is $23,500. Staff recommends the addition of $1,500 contingency to be utilized, if necessary. The scope of work outlined within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, will be conducted over a five-year period. - DMG-Maximus is a well-known,_ respected executivesearch firm providing similar services to municipalities over several years. The consultant firm will develop a recruitment profile, actively recruit for the position, prepare and place advertisements, evaluate resumes and candidates, and assist the City Council in its selection of Diamond Bar's next city manager. Mr. Norman Roberts, a national leading recruiter for Governmental Agencies and Municipalities, and Mr. 'Eric Middleton, a manager of the firm, will conduct the search and provide the recruitment services for the City:' Attachments: DMG-Maximus Proposal dated October 23, 2000 (previouslytransmitted) 2 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of ` by and between -the City of Diamond Bar, a municipal corporation ("City") and DMG-Maximus, Inc. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide consulting, services to City as set forth in Exhibit "A", the City's Request for Proposals dated ,2000. B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance ;by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: L Consultant's Services. A. Scope of. Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "B the Consultant's Response, dated October 23, 2000, to the City's Request for Proposals. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are -as set forth in Exhibit "B. 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect , 2000, and shall continue until unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B Payment will be made only after submission of proper invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000). 4. General Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's, proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 5. Addresses. City: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager Consultant: Mr. Norman Roberts City of Diamond Bar Mr. Eric Middleton 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 DMG-Maximus, Inc. Suite 100 1800 Century Park East, Suite 430 Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 Los Angeles, CA 90067-,1507 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant'is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. B. Consultant agreesto pay all required taxes on amounts paid .to Consultant under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City -harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consultant and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable worker's' compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all work at the standard of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar conditions. 8. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify the City, its officers, agents, volunteers, employees, and attorneys against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the negligent, reckless or wrongful acts, errors or omissions of Consultant, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, including each person or entity responsible for the provision of services hereunder. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several. 9. Insurance. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage` against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees; agents, and independent` contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (4) professional liability insurance (errors and omissions) to cover or partially cover damages that may be the result of errors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per claim; and (5) worker's compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater. City, its officers; employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies)' as to comprehensive general liability,',, property damage, and automotive liability. The policy (ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property 'damage, and automobile liability shall provide that they are primary, and that any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess insurance only. A. All insurance policies for comprehensive general liability and auto shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non -renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified as it effects City (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) day's prior written notice thereof. 'Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage as it effects City. B. All policies of insurance shall cover the obligations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; shall be issued by -an insurance company which is admitted to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by the City; and shall be placed with a current A.M. Best's -rating of no less that A VIL C. Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement", or a substantially similar form which the City has agreed in writing to accept. 10. Confidentiality. Consultant in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data of City, private individuals, or employees of the. City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this g y authorization Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed b Consultant written by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant prepares reports of a proprietary nature specifically for and in connection with certain projects, the City shall not, except with Consultant's prior written consent, use the same for other unrelated projects. 11. Ownership of Materials. All materials provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of City. 12. Conflict of Interest. A. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not,acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. B. Consultant covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of hardware or software to City as a result of the performance of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 13. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon fifteen (15) days' written notice to the other party. However, Consultant shall not -terminate thisAgreementduring the provision of services on a particular project.. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the fifteenth (15th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, City agrees to pay Consultant for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Consultantshall discontinue performing' services. 14. Personnel. Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Consultant or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Consultant reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right, for good cause, to require Consultant to exclude any employee from performing services on City's premises. 15. , Non -Discrimination and: Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Consultant shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of City relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination' shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant state either that it is an equal' opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 16. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, and any attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. 17. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by, this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall meet with Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, City may direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. 18. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more erformanc of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any -right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default: 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either parry to this Agreement shall commence any legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 21. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile before or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 22. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 23. Counterparts. This Agreement maybe executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk: 25. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. "City" ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By: By: City Clerk Mayor Approved as to form: - By: "CONSULTANT" City Attorney By: Its: ADDITIONAL. INSURED ENDORSEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY_ Name and address of named insured ("Named Insured"): Name and address of Insurance Company ("Company"): General description of agreement(s), permit(s), licenses) and/or activity(les) insured: Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the, policy to which this endorsement is attached (the "Policy") or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The (PublicAgency' its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above namedadditional insureds are hereafter referred to as the "Additional Insureds") under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the Policy shall be primary insurance, and' no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages provided by the Policy. 3 Each insurance, coverage under the Policy shall apply separately to each Additional Insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by, one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall covered as third party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained in or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s), or permits) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. J-1 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall not be subject to -cancellation, change in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non -renewal except -after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereof. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. S. It is hereby agreed that the laws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive; alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or, exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF TIIIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROMITO LIABILITY 11. Scheduled items or locations are to be identified on an attached sheet. The following inclusions relate to the above coverages. Includes: ❑ Contractual Liability ❑ Explosion Hazard ❑ Owners/Landlords/Tenants ❑ Collapse Hazard ❑ Manufacturers/Contractors ❑ Underground Property Damage ❑ Products/Completed Operations ❑ Pollution Liability ❑ Broad Form Property Damage 0 Liquor Liability ❑ Extended Bodily Injury ❑ Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability Endorsement ❑ J-2 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY 12. A ❑ deductible or ❑ self-insured retention (check one) of $ applies to all coverage(s) except: (if none, so state). The deductible is applicable ❑ per claim or ❑ per occurrence (check one), 13. This is an ❑ occurrence or ❑ claims made policy (check one). 14. This endorsement is effective on at 12:01 A.M. and forms apart of Policy Number 1 (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the 'Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed - 119 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only; no facsimile signature or 1 initialed signature accepted) Phone. No.: J-3 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Name and address of named insured ( "Named Insured"): Name and address of Insurance Company ("Company"): General description of agreement(s), permit(s), license(s), and/or activity(ies) insured: Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached (the "Policy") or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The ("Public Agency"), its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above named additional insureds are hereafter referred to as the "Additional Insureds") under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have..no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the Policy shall be primary insurance, and no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages; provided by the Policy. 3. Each insurance coverage under the Policy shall,apply separately to each Additional Insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall covered as third - party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s) or permit(s) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall not be subject to cancellation, change J-4 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non -renewal except after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, -return receipt requested, not -less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereto. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. 8, It is hereby agreed that the laws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMrrS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROM/TO 4 LIABILITY 11. Scheduled items or locations are to be identified on an attached sheet. The following inclusions relate to the above coverages. Includes: ❑ Any Automobiles ❑ Truckers Coverage All Owned Automobiles ❑ Motor Carrier Act Non -owned Automobiles ❑ Bus Regulatory Reform Act ❑ Hired Automobiles ❑ Public Livery Coverage ❑ Scheduled Automobiles ❑ ❑ Garage Coverage 12. A ❑ deductible or ❑ self-insured retention (check one) of $ - applies to all coverage(s) except: (if none, so state). The deductible is applicable ❑ per claim or ❑ per occurrence (check one). 13. This is an ❑ occurrence or ❑ claims made policy (check one). J-5 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 14. This endorsement is effectiveon at 12:01 A.M. and forms a part of Policy Number I, (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed 19 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only; no facsimile signature'' or initialed signature accepted) Phone No.: ( ) J-6 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT 11 EXCESS LIABILITY Name and address of named insured ("NamedInsured"): Name and address of Insurance Company ("Company"): General description of agreement(s), permit(s), license(s), and/or activity(ies) insured: Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached (the "Policy") or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The ("Public Agency"), its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents,' employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above named additional insureds are hereafter referred to as the "Additional Insureds") under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the`Policy shall be primary insurance, and no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages provided by the Policy. 3. Each insurance coverage under the Policy shall apply separately to each Additional Insured against' whom' claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall covered as third - party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's` limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained in or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s) or permit(s) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. J-7 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT s EXCESS LIABILITY 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall notbesubject to cancellation, change - in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non -renewal -except after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than' thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereto. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will -continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. 8. It is hereby agreed that the taws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROM/TO LIABILITY Following Form ❑ Umbrella Liability 11. Applicable underlying coverages: INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. AMOUNT 12. The following inclusions, exclusions, extensions or specific provisions relate to the above coverages: 13. A ❑ deductible or ❑ self. -insured retention (check one) of $ applies to all coverage(s) except: none,' so state). The deductible is applicable ❑ per claim or ❑ per occurrence (check one). J-8 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT EXCESS LIABILITY a 14. This is an ❑ occurrence or ❑ claims made policy (check one). 15. This endorsement is effective on at 12:01 A.M.-and forms,a part of Policy Number I, (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed '19 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only, no facsimile signature or initialed signature accepted) Phone No.:( ) J-9 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT EXCESS LIABILITY, i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James De Stefano, Interim City Manager DATE: November 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Approval of Conceptual Design for the New City Hall Facility at the AQMD Campus RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the conceptual design plan for the City Hall offices at the AQMD campus and authorize staff to develop final detailed construction documents and direct City Clerk to advertise for the acceptance of bids. BACKGROUND: On September 5t" the City Council authorized staff to enter into agreements with SPACES and TOTAL PLAN for design services related to the proposed relocation of the City Hall facility from 21660 E. Copley Drive to the AQMD' campus. Since that time, City staff and the design team, including representatives of both SPACES ''& TOTAL PLAN, have been developing a',space and office design plan that will adequately serve the needs of the community, City Council and City staff. DISCUSSION: An office design plan has been developed culminating several weeks of work including a complete inventory of all existing office furniture, fixtures and equipment at City Hall as well as the equipment available for use by the City at the AQMD facility; meeting with all departments to understand existing and future' space requirements for their respective operations; review and modifications by the executive management team and cost estimates provided by the contractors. The next step in the process is to move from the attached floor plan drawings to the development of construction documents. Construction documents are detailed drawings and other relevant information necessary to enableprospective contractors to provide firm construction bids through the formal bid process. The development of the construction documents will take two additional weeks. In order to maintain our construction schedule the City Council is scheduled to award a construction contract on or beforeits meeting of January 2nd. In order to facilitate the award of a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, the City is required to proceed through the formal bid process. The formal bid process requires the City to publish a notice inviting bids and setting the date for the opening of the bids in'a newspaper of general circulation. The publication of the invitation of bids, must be placed at least 10 days before the date of the bid opening. The construction documents must be completed prior to, or concurrent with, the solicitation of bids. City staff and the design team will develop the construction documents and the request for proposal to provide for alternate options. In other words there will be the basic construction details along with optional items that the City may select to incorporate in the project depending upon cost. For example, the City will request the contractors to provide cost estimates for both a carpeted front lobby area as well as a lobby are using, tile material. The tile material will provide a more formal presence and will be easier to keep clean. However, using tile in the lobby area may result in additional costs. By bidding this element of the project as an alternate option, the City has the flexibility to review the cost difference and decide which material to use. Following conceptual approval of the design by the City Council, staff will continue to develop formal construction documents, prepare a formal bid package, advertise in accordance with State law, accept bids, review and analyze the bids and recommend the responsible low bidder to Council for award of contract. It will take up to two weeks to develop the construction documents; advertising and accepting bids will take up to 10 days; and the design team will require at least one week to review and analyze the submitted bids to ensure award of contract to the lowest, responsible bidder. Once the lowest responsible bidder is identified, staff will return to the City Council and propose award a construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There is no direct budgetary implication with the conceptual approval of the design layout. However, at the time a construction contract is awarded, the City. Council will need to appropriate the necessary funds to complete the work. Preliminary budget estimates have been received from five contractors who have reviewed the attached plans and participated in a preliminary job walk with City staff and design team. Based on the preliminary budget estimates provided by the contractors, the cost of the tenant improvements, excluding the installation of computer network cabling systems, phone systems; furniture, etc., is approximately $250,000 --$275,000. Again these are budget estimates and the actual cost of construction will not be determined until the final engineering is completed and the formal bids are received. The following items are attached for City Council review: 1. Attachment A -Draft floor plan showing the office and modular office equipment layout, 2. Attachment B — Draft detail plan of the front counter design 3. Attachment C —Draft detail plan of the tile design for the front lobby area. Prepared By: !dDoyle Deputy City Manager 441 uj a b E ® 71 C.? gill =g =E t a f E C $ 9 'III 5- �' ell ; ,,I , L $ o— m . ,gy fill Fulm., , 4.Fix� LU Y 6 AAO ® 6 06 60® A A A O 0 I 'RI11 M- ,o� �@ s' fit if tu if gill v- Jd 1J J JiJ—- s. fill O c ° gq J $. I �_ Un d RR w Il v vve.6= r. . 1PIIMr11l Q4'#F+•W f.��pAJF=O.QeFNSDMi\ .!. / LU §./?�� \� .:./ f.�.\: y..~\2 . - . /U- \. \Ir $\�` .� . x .\ » cr / /�.§?. \\ LU K<..,\.:..'.\�.I~�.\ �f J O a c'x 0 ' .. a ru ui a im ,i r >p r i x ` � � r c y 0 ol J W V a cit »>� �t'axalurw wms�wwz i m W y, U I C9 til OD i X' m 1 i 0 0 3 Z OR m 00 0 J W V a cit »>� �t'axalurw wms�wwz CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 14, 2000 FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager TITLE: Notice of Completion for the Brea Canyon Road (between Pathfinder Road and Golden Springs Drive) Street Rehabilitation Project. SUMMARY: On June 6, 2000, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $672,000.00 with a contingency of $67,000 for a total authorization amount of $739,000.00 to rehabilitate Brea Canyon Road from Pathfinder Road to Golden Springs, Drive. Construction commenced on July 17, 2000, and was completed on August 31, 2000, ahead of the original anticipated completion date of October 17, 2000. Staff determined that all work including punch list items are complete and in accordance with the specifications prepared and approved by the City. The final construction contract amount is $801,516.75. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council (1) authorize the Interim City Manager to approve a contract amendment with Sully -Miller Contracting Co. in an amount not -to -exceed $62,516.75 and (2) accept the work performed by Sully -Miller Contracting Co. and authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and to release any retention amounts thirty- five days after the recordation date. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report - Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification X Other: Notice of Completion 1`. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: James DeStefano Davi G. iu Interim City Manager Director of Public Works N/A Yes No Majority N/A Yes _ No N/A Yes No _Yes X No CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE BREA CANYON ROAD (BETWEEN PATHFINDER ROAD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE) STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT. ISSUE STATEMENT: To file and submit for recordation a Notice of Completion for the Brea Canyon Road (between Pathfinder Road and Golden Springs Drive) Street Rehabilitation Project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council (1) authorize the Interim City Manager to approve a contract amendment with Stilly -Miller Contracting Co. in an amount not -to -exceed $62,516.75 and (2) authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release any retention amount thirty-five (35) days after the recordation date: FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The total allocated project budget is $850,000 and the process of filing Notice of Completion has no fiscal impact on the City. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On June 6, 2000, the City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $672,000.00 with a contingency amount of $67,000.00 for a total authorization amount of $730,000.00 to rehabilitate Brea Canyon Road from Pathfinder Road to Golden Springs Drive. Construction commenced on July 17, 2000, and was completed on August 31, 2000, ahead of the original anticipated completion date of October 17, 2000. To enhance the project and address the finalconstructed quantities for the asphalt concrete and pavement reinforcing fabric, change orders in the amount of :$129,516.75` are necessary to complete the contract. With the authorized contingency amount of $67,000 and the financial participation of all players in the amount of $22,000, an amount of $40,516.75 is being requested to complete the required changes. The amended contract amount would be $801,516.75. Prepared By: David G Liu RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE, STE. 100 DIAMOND BAR CA 91765-4177 ATTENTION: CITY CLERK NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is the owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar I � 3. The full address of the owner is 21660 East CgpleV Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar CA 91965 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. (If other than fee, strike In fee" and insert, for example, "purchaser under contract of purchase," or "lessee") 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: ' NAMESADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on The work done was: Brea Canyon Rd. Between Pathfinder RdJGolden Serines Dr. Street Rehabilitation Project 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was SWIV-Miller Contracting Co Tune 6 2000 (If no contrnctor for work of improvement as a whole, insert none) (Date of Contract) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows Brea Canyon Road between Pathfinder Road and Golden Springs Drive Street Rehabilitation Proiect 9. The street address of said property is Brea Canyon Road Between Pathfinder Road and Golden Sprint=s Drive T (If no street address hasbeen officially: assigned, insert "hone") - CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Dated: Verification for Individual Owner Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner named in paragraph 2.or his agent VERIFICATION 1, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Works the declarant of the foregoing ("resident of', Manager of 1, 'A partner of', " Ownerof', etc.) - notice of completion; 1 have read said notice of completion and know the contests thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 19 �, at Diamond Bar California. (Date of signature) (City where signed) r (Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the notice of completion are true) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0. TO: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 15, 2000 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Consideration for Proposed 4h of July Concert and Fireworks Show SUMMARY: The 4th of July is on a Wednesday in 2001. Summer Concerts in the Park have been conducted on Wednesday evenings for the past 10 years. Continued on Page 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staffrecommends that the City Council review the options presented for the July 4, 2001 Summer Concert date and direct staff as deemed_appropriate LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report — Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specifications Ordinance(s) X Other Minutes of September 5, 2000 _ Agreement(s) Joint Meeting of P&R Commission and City Council., Staff Report of October 17, 2000 City Council Meeting. - Minutes of October 17, 2000 City Council Meeting. Summary of resident comments from response cards. Letter to residents dated October 25, 2000. Sample of response card. Approval letter from Calvary Chapel EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION; SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? Yes X No 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes No What Commission? Parks and Recreation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? — Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REVIEWED BY: James DeStefano eoYKose Interim City Manager Community Services Director I Continued from Page 1— Summary The concert before Independence Day has always been billed as the "Patriotic" concert. Because of these circumstances, staff has developed three options for the "Patriotic" concert for the summer of 2001. Option is for an evening concert on July 4th from,6:30p.m. to 9:00p.m., followed with a fireworks show. Cost for Option I is about $20,000. Option II is for an afternoon concert on July 4th from 1:00p.m. to 4.00 p.m. with no fireworks show. Cost for Option I I is about $10,000. Option III is to have the Patriotic Concert on June 271h instead of July 4th, with no fireworksshow. ' Cost for Option III is about $2,000, the regular cost for a single summer concert. Option III also saves about $2,000'in the FY 2001/02 budget because there would be only nine concerts instead of the usual ten. This item was continued from the October 17, 2000 City Council Meeting. At that meeting, the City Council directed staff to obtain additional information related to this event, which is proposed for Sycamore Canyon Park. Staff was directed to ■ Determine availability of parking ■ Examine park capacity Obtain input from residents Staff's response to this direction ■ Confirmed parking for this event is available at Calvary Chapel and Diamond Bar Country Club, a total of about 950 parking spaces combined. ■ Capacity for the grass area of Sycamore` Canyon Park is 5,000 people, based on the standard of one person per 7 square feet. Staff expects a turn out of about 2,4000 people. ■ Staff mailed 523 letters to residents living within Yz mile of Sycamore Canyon Park. 126 responses were returned to the City with 95 favorable responses and 31 unfavorable responses. r CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: Consideration for Proposed 4th of July Concert and Fireworks Show Issue Statement Shall the City fund and conduct"a Patriotic Concert and Fireworks Show on July 4, 2001 as a part of its Summer Concerts in the Park Series Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review the options presented for the July 4,'2001 Summer Concert date and direct staff as deemed appropriate. Financial Summary Option l Fireworks Show and Evening Concert - $20,000 Option II Afternoon Concert with no Fireworks Show- $10,000 Option III Conduct Patriotic Concert on June 27th with no Fireworks Show, skip the July 4th concert date, and conduct only nine (9) summer concerts rather than the normal ten (10). Savings of about $2,000 in FY 2001/02 Budget. Background This subject was first discussed at the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting on August 24, 2000. It was pointed out that July 4, 2001 is a Wednesday and that Summer Concerts in the Park have always been conducted on Wednesday evenings. Because of this circumstance, the Commission has recommended that fireworks be added to the Summer Concert Program that evening. This recommendation was presented to the City Council at their regular,meeting on October 17, 2000. Three options for the proposed July 0 concert date were presented to the City Council, including: I Option -I Fireworks Show and Evening: Concert - $20,000 Option II Afternoon Concert with no Fireworks Show -$10,000 Option III Schedule Patriotic Concert on June 27th and skip July 4th as a summer concert date - savings of about $2,000. (one less summer concert) After deliberations by:the Council Members, staff was directed to provide the following information regarding is proposed event: 1_) Determine parking availability. 2.) Determine the capacity of the site. 3.) Obtain input from residents who live adjacent to Sycamore Canyon Park. Discussion' Following is staff's response to the City Council's request for additional information: 1.) Staff, has made arrangements with both Calvary Chapel and the Diamond Bar Country Club to use their parking lots for this event. There are about 950 parking spaces at these two locations, combined. ..2.) The upper area of Sycamore Canyon Park has a grass field that is over 35,000 square feet in size,' The standard for festival seating in an outdoor, area without fixed seating is 7 square feet per person. With that standard, the capacity for the grass area of the park is 5,000 people. Staff is estimating a turnout of approximately 2,400 people. 3.) Staff mailed 523 letters with pre -paid postage response cards to residents living within about %z mile from Sycamore Canyon Park. A total of 126 cards were returned as of November 15, 2000. Following is the break down of resident responses: Yes, fireworks are a good idea: 95 cards No, do not have fireworks: 31 cards Many of the response cards (both pro and con) expressed concern about the fire danger related to having fireworks at Sycamore Canyon Park. Staff- met with a representative from Pyro Spectacular (firework show provider at the City's Millennium Celebration) and with inspectors from the LA County Fire Department to verify that this event can be safely,conducted at Sycamore Canyon Park. After touring the park and the proposed launching site, it was determined that the fireworks show canoe safely conducted at the park. Representatives from Pyro Spectacular 'and the LA County Fire Department are expected to attend the City Council Meeting to be available to answer questions from the Council. In order to conduct the concert on July 4, 2001 as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission, the cost will be approximately $20,000. Preliminary budget is as follows: Option I - Fireworks Show 1 Evening Concert Fireworks $8,500 *Entertainment $2,500 Sound System $2,000 Traffic Control Equipment $1,000 Sheriff's Deputies $3,000 Stage Lights $ 500 Insurance $ 750 Fencing Around Fireworks $. 500 Decorations Im ESTIMATED TOTAL $19,750 Option II - No Fireworks Show/ Afternoon Concert An option to the fireworks show and evening concert is to hold an afternoon concert from 1:00 p.m.- 4:00 p.m. with two different bands performing and no fireworks show. Cost for this option is estimated as follows: *Entertainment $3,500 Sound System $2,000 , Sheriff's Deputies $1,500 Decorations $1,000 Canopies 1110 ESTIMATED TOTAL $9,750 Option III No Concert on July 4, 2001 Both Options l and Il are very expensive when compared to a regular concert that costs about $2,000. The additional cost is primarily due to the high rates charged by vendors on a holiday like the 4t" of July. Sheriff's costs vary because of the expected difference in crowd size for the different options. A fireworks show is sure to draw a large crowd to the vicinity of Sycamore Canyon Park, plus a street closure will have to occur on Golden Springs while the fireworks show is in process. If no concert is held on July 4t", then it is recommended that the patriotic concert be held on :June 27, 2001 (with no fireworks.) *Note - Entertainment listed in Options I & Il wouldinclude 1-112 to 2 hours of a professional; band and 45 minutes to one hour of the 80 member Pacific Crest Drum and Bugle Corps. Prepared by: Bob Rose Community Services Director CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION JOINT MEETING WITH THE: PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: November 21, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 15, 2000 FROM: James De Stefano, City Manager TITLE: Appointment of Two Community Members to serve as Alternates to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee SUMMARY: At its meeting of November 7, 2000, the City Council appointed Diamond Bar community members Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell along with City Councilmember Carol Herrera to serve on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee. At that time, the City Council also appointed City Councilmember Bob Huff to sere as the alternate City Council representative to the Committee.Also at that meeting, the City Council directed that the City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee members should nominate two alternates for each of the at -large, community representative seats.' The City's advisory committee will meet on November 20th for the purpose of nominating two community members to sere, on the Committee. The names of the nominees will be presented to the City Council at the City Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council appoint two community members to sere as alternates to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: — Staff Report Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) _ Ordinance(s) Other: Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTIONS SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: I Has the resolution, ordinance' or agreement been reviewed - Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote?_ Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: James DeStefano David Doyle Interim, City Manager Deputy City Manager AGENDA No. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEMORANDUM TO`. Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: James De Stefano, Interim City Manager DATE: November 21`, 2000 SUBJECT: Appointment of Two Community Members to serve as Alternates to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council appoint two community member alternates to the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There is no costs or financial implications associated with the appointment of the members of the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee. However, the City may incur additional costs through participation of community members on the Committee. BACKGROUND The Statement of Principles and Commitment between the cities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and Pomona and the Department of Developmental Services(DDS) related to the proposed expansion of the Lanterman Developmental Center (LDC) specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to (a) assure a full and fair sharing of information and concerns among DDS' and the local communities and their residents with respect to the ongoing operation of the specialized behavioral program at LDC and (b) confirm on an ongoing basis that DDS/LDC are in compliance with the terms and conditions to be set forth in this Agreement and other legal requirements relating to the specialized behavioral program. The Community Advisory Committee will make recommendations to DDS/LDC regarding the specialized behavioral program,, which DDS/LDC shall consider in good faith. The Community Advisory Committee will have 16 members, comprised of (2) representatives from DDS, (3) representatives from the City of Diamond Bar (2) of whom will be residents who are not elected officials or AGENDANo. employees of that City or employees of Lanterman Developmental Center, (3) representatives from the City of Pomona (2) of whom will be residents who are not elected officials or employees of that City or employees of Lanterman Developmental Center, (3) representatives from the City of Walnut (1`) of whom will be a resident that is not an elected officials or employees of that City or employees of Lanterman Developmental Center, (2) client representatives from Lanterman Developmental Center (1) of whom shall be a client in the severe behavioral program, and (2) representatives from the Parent Coordinating Council and (1`) from the Area Board 10 or from the Governor's Advisory Board. DISCUSSION: At its meeting of November 7, 2000, the City Council appointed Diamond Bar community members Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell along with City Councilmember Carol Herrera to serve on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee. At that time, the City Council also appointed City Councilmember Bob Huff to serve as the alternate City Council representative to the Committee. Also at that meeting, the City Council directed that the City's Lanterman DevelopmentalCenter Advisoy Committee members should nominate two alternates for each of the at -large, community representative seats. The appointment of alternate representatives will help ensure that there is always three Diamonds Bar representatives available to,attend the Committee meetings. The City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee will meet on November 20, 2000 for the purpose of nominating two, at -large community representative alternates. The names of the nominees will be provided to the City Council the night of the City Council meeting: nrspd A3� eC.JePa% C,ciy �arta�er REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 7 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Huff called the meeting to order at 8:43 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Herrera, O'Connor, Vice Chairman Chang'and Chairman Huff. Also present.were: James DeStefano, Interim Executive Director; Mike Jenkins, Agency Attorney; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager, David Liu, Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director, Linda Magnuson, Finance Director, Mike Nelson, Communications and Marketing Director, and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. e 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3. CONSENTCALENDAR: AM/O'Connor moved, AWAnsari seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Chang, i Chair/Huff NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS None 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2000 As submitted. 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated November 7, 2000 in the amount of $41,548.72. 3.3 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT for September 2000. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None i 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: None Offered. , e DIAS'o mLi..BAt Rt:.rEVE,,-br-'i-EhtT -AGENCI VOL REGI STE! ; PPfi VAL ` ; z-F}C-..' tYtta;` _d'ied-- 1 "a. ^tI i 4a ' CJ's vou+_.fi"'tC- rs a. a ed' NoveliFber .. 1 y '.,..i_}E_ 0 ha't e�..3' een reviewed, approved nd r•ecorrgleinded for payment. °Gyrr:ents are haraby -aj l cnzofiCi from the fol. li:).w:f g ri_tt'€d-`= in-.these-c^1.rricU's1" t=_. FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID VOUCHERS 610 e f ;EE-D,_.VEL:OPMEN sW iCt 10 3 yt4 } sg 560.00 E EEf' !R1 FOR ALL rUNrjw, �0 X24,--.,.^. 1 , APPROVED BY _,.nda G. # 7T .E_ 5 Robert S. Huff _ Finance T-dre'cto C h i r x4.41 M- A `• es.4;a. i t —... vii em, h an g j t.. ] n t r r J. m e 4 VE .F i ?c•C'.r.Jr 33.c e Chci3 r43tr 3i