HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/07/2000South Coast Air Quality Management District
Main Auditorium
21865 East,Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Mayor Debby O'Connor
Mayor Pro Tem Eileen Ansari
Council Member Wen Chang
Council Member Carol Herrera
Council Member Bob Huff
Interim City Manager James DeStefana
City Attorney Michael Jenkins
City Clerk Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available-for public inspection. If you have questions regarding
an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II ofthe Aineeicans withDisabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance
or accommodation(s);in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform
the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Have •nline access? City Council Agendas are now availableon
City of Diamond -• site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com
Please refrain }rom smoking; eating or drinking in the Council Chamberx
The City ofDiamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same.
ry,
DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL RULES
(ALSO APPLIES TO COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS)
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. Amember ofthe public may address the Council on the subject of one or more
agenda items and/or other items of urterest which are within the subject matter jurisdiction ofthe Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the
Council should be submitted in person to the City Clerk
:Asa general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion ofthe Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting,
Persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may
limit the public input on any item or the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the
business ofthe Council.
Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks towards Council Members or other citizens. Comments which are not.conducive to a
positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City Council and will not be tolerated.
cooperation Your is !eatl
y
In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.30) the Chair may from time to time'dispense with public comment on items previously
considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Committee meetings.)
In accordance with State law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Council
meeting. In case of emergency, or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting ofthe agenda, upon making certain findings the Council may
act on an item that is not on the posted agenda
CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect to a regular or special meeting ofthe
Diamond Bar City Council.
A. Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member ofthe staffthereot tending to interrupt the due and orderly
�I
course of said meeting
B. A breach ofthe peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of
said meeting
C. Disobedience of any lawful order ofthe Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from addressing the
Board; and
D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL
Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer through a phone modem.
Every meeting of the City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area Sign language interpreter
services are also available by giving notice at least three business days in advance ofthe meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8-a.m.
and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules ofthe Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860.2489
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Information (909) 860-2489
NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA.
s ss s _ 5 t s��sx< s s s 5ssssususs ■�ss 3 # � �� � x 5# #si# � # ## # # ���
r
a � c ,� s ii�G#s�##�i•#��#�� ��� z� � s ,� �S��fS
j
�:.tsu,.>..,::>�x::xc;;r,.:>f rra.•.:r•:,,, .....:..:: {••s^t a.. t#,5 #'s ...>.> .:.:. ..'.. ::t -.:...###s �T �C a::-::::. `-:?.::.#.:..:::n�::. s. r. �:'3�'ts r� #sd.G"Fz-�::' �3i .c�`,.•,
Next Resolution No. 2000-54
Next Ordinance No. 07 (2000)
1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m.,, CC -8
1) Public Employment - GC 54957.6 - Discussion of Interim
City Manager Contract
2) Conference with Legal Counsel - Initiation of Litigation
- GC 54956.9 - one case
2. CALL TO ORDER. 6:30 p.m., November 7, 2000
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor
INVOCATION: Reverend Mike Schuenemeyer, D.B.
Congregational Church
ROLL CALL.: Council Members Chang, Herrera, Huff,
Mayor Pro Tem Ansari, Mayor O'Connor
APPROVAL, OF AGENDA: Mayor
3A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS;, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.A.1 Proclaiming November 15, 2000 as "America Recycles
Day."
3.A.2 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to D.B.
Residents David Reynolds, Southcoast Cabinets, and
Cimarron Oaks VIII Homeowner's Assn.., `Trash
Cutters Award" Recipients.
3.A3 Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Andrew
Sumpter, Diamond Bar resident., National Academic
All-American Scholar.
3.A.4 Presentation of Quarterly Crime Statistic Report by
Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff and Update on Civilian
Advisory Committee
3.A.5 Presentation by Waste Management on New Trash
Program
3B. INTERIM CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
4.. 4.a PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the
time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directlyaddress the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 - PAGE 2
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments,
pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take
any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please
complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk
(completion of this form -is voluntary). There is a five
minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council
4.b RESPONSE TO PUBLIC C%MNT: Under the Brown. Act,
members of the City Council may briefly respond to public
comments but no extended discussion and no action on such
matters may take place.
5 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 DIAMOND BAR ON LINE - November 8, 2000 6:00 p.m., AQMD
Room CC -8, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - November 9, 2000 -
6:�00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21.865 E. Copley Dr,.
5.3 VETERAN'S DAY - November 10 2000 (Friday) - City Offices
will be closed in observance` of Veteran's Day. Will
reopen Monday, November 13, 2000:
5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION - November 14, 2000 7:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.5 COMMUNITY MEETING REGARDING THE COMMUNITY%SENIOR CENTER
- November 15, 2000 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865
E. Copley Dr.
5.6 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - November 16, 2000 - 7:00
p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.7 DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION November 16, 2000
7:00 p.m., AQMD Room CC -8,'21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.8 COMMUNITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE November 20, 2000 -
7:00 p.m;., AQMD Room CC -2 21865 E Copley Dr.
5.9 LANTERMAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - November 20, 2000 CC -8,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 21,, 2000 6:30 p.m,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr,
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2000
- Approve as submitted.
NOVEMBER
PAGE 3
7, 2000
Requested
by: City Clerk
6.2
PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES:"
6.2.1
Regular Meeting of September 12, 2000 - Receive
and File.
6.2.2
Regular _Meeting of September 26, 2000 - Receive
and File;
Requested by: Planning Division
6,3.
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
6.381
Regular, Meeting of August 10, 2000 - Receive
and File.
6.3.2
Regular Meeting of September 14, 2000 - Receive
and File.
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.4
PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting
of September 28, 2000 - Receive and File.
Requested
by Community Services Division
6.5
VOUCHER REGISTER -- Approve Voucher Register dated
November 7, 2000.in the amount of $810,445.66.
Requested
by: Finance Division
6.6
TREASURER'S
REPORT - Submitted for City Council's review
and approval is the Treasurer"s Statement for September,
2000..
Requested
by: Finance Division
6.7
CLAIM FOR
DAMAGES'
6.7.1
Filed by Erika Daly October 5, 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that
the City Council deny the Claim for Damages
filed and refer the matter to the Claims
Manager for further action.
6.,7.2
Filed by Juana Daly October 5, 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that
the City Council deny the Claim for Damages
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 4
filed and refer the matter to the Claims
Manager for further action.
6.7.3 Filed by Juan GarciaOctober5, 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that
the City Council deny the Claim for Damages
filed and refer the matter to the Claims
Manager for further.action.
Requested by; City Clerk
6.8 EXTENSION OF VENDOR SERVICES FOR PRINTING SERVICES - The
City has utilized Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. to ;provide
printing services for City business cards, miscellaneous
forms and the fall issue of the Community Recreation
Guide for a total expenditure of $11,600 for the current
fiscal year. In addition, they have been awarded the
contract to publish the winter, spring and summer issues
of the Community Recreation Guide. Per the City's
Purchasing Ordinance, awards for services to a single
vendor in a fiscal year shall not exceed the City
Manager's purchasing authority of $15,000 without
authorization, from the City Council. The combination of
these printing services would bring the total expenditure
up` to $;50, 000 for the current' fiscal year.. Funds for
these services are already included in the 2000/01 fiscal
year budget
Recommended Action': It is recommended that the City
Council authorize additional printing services to be
performed by Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. in an amount not
to exceed $50,0.00 for the 2000/01 FY.
Requested by; Community Services Division
6.9, AWARD OF INSPECTION SERVICES FOR TRACTS 48487 AND 50314
- It is the intent of the developer:, Windmill
Development/C&A Developers, to develop Tracts 48487 and
50314 simultaneously. Tracts 48487 and 50314consist of
thirty single family residences on sixty-four acres in
The Country. The developer anticipates commencement of
construction in early 'November 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council award inspection services for Tracts 48487 and
50314 to Hall & Foreman, Inc. in an •amount not -to -exceed
$30,273.86.
Requested by: Planning Division
NOVEMBER 7, 20bO PAGE 5
6.10 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT
GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE, AT LEMON AVENUE AND DIAMOND BAR
BOULEVARD AT SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS - City traffic engineer, Warren Siecke has
designed and prepared plans and specifications for left
turn traffic signals at the intersection of•Golden Spgs
Dr. at Lemon Ave. and Diamond Bar Blvd. at Sunset
Crossing Rd. To expedite the construction time, the two
intersections have been incorporated into one set of
plans and specifications to be bid at one time.
Recommended Action: it is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No. 2000 -XX: Approving Plans
and Specifications for the Traffic Signal Improvements at .
Golden Spgs. Dr. at Leman Ave,. and Diamond Bar Blvd. at
Sunset Crossing Rd. in said City and Authorizing and
Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids
Requested by: Public Works Division
6.11 AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BONTERRA CONSULTING TO PROVIDE
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING SERVICES FOR VESTING
TRACT MAL' NOS. 48487 AND 50314 (WILDMILL DEVELOPMENT/JCC)
- Approval of an amendment to an existing consulting
services agreement with BonTerra Consulting ;is requested
in order to provide environmental services necessary to
monitor the mitigation measures as outlined within the
previously -approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No
52267.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve an agreement with BonTerra Consulting in
the amount of $83,172 for environmental mitigation
monitoring services for VTM Nos. .58487 and 50314
(Windmill Development/JCC).
Requested by Planning Division
6.12 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -XX: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AMENDED AND RESTATED
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT The San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) was established by
a Joint Powers Agreement the City is a party to, the
Agreement and a member of SGVCOG. SGVCOGG membership
amendedthe Agreement and created the Alameda Corridor
Eas Construction Authority to implement the Alameda
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 6
Corridor East (ACE) Project. By January, the rate of
expenditure will increase as the/project moves forward,
with funding provided through Federal and State grants.
Federal and State funding is reimbursed in arrears after
invoices have been paid. Thus, Authority staff has
determined that the Authority will experience cash flow
difficulties by early 2001 as it -lets more contracts to
implement the ACE Project. It has been determined that
short term borrowing will be the best course of action to
solve cash flow concerns The first step in authorizing
short -tem borrowing is to amend the SGVCOG Agreement to
provide the power to borrow, incur indebtedness and/or
issue bonds. Adoption of the amendment will have no
effect whatsoever on the City's liability,
creditworthiness or its own ability to issue debt.
Recommended Action:It is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No. 2000 -XX approving and
adopting an amendment to the San Gabriel Valley Council
of Governments Joint Powers Authority Amended and
Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement.
Requested by: City Manager
6.13 AMENDMENT NO.. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
SPACES TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION BID ANALYSIS/NEGOTIATION
SERVICES RELATIVE TO THE RELOCATION OF CITY HALL TO THE
AQMD FACILITY AND APPROPRIATE THE NECESSARY FUNDS FROM
GENERAL FUND RESERVES - On September 5,, 2000, the City
contracted with SPACES to provide space planning and
design services relative to the proposed relocation of
the City Hall offices to the 'AQMD' facility. At that
time, SPACES included two optional services-, bid
analysis/negotiation services and construction management
services, for the City to consider. Staff is
recommending that the City utilize the expertise of
SPACES to assist with the 'analysis of both the
preliminary cons-truction bids and the final construction
bids.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve Amendment No 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with SPACES to include construction
_bid analysis and negotiation services relative to the
proposed move.to the AQMD facility and appropriate $4,000
from General Fund reserves.
Requested by: City Manage
6.14' EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH JAMES DeSTEFANO TO SERVE AS
INTERIM CITY MANAGER - On October 17, 2000, City
Manager
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 7
Terrence L. Belanger resigned his position effective
October 20, 2000, in order to commence employment as City
Manager for the City of Yorba Linda. Council accepted
the resignation of Mr. Belanger, appointed James
DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, as the Interim City
Manager and directed staff to solicit proposals from
executive search firms. Additionally, Council directed
a subcommittee comprised of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
to develop additional compensation and benefits for the
Interim City Manager. The Subcommittee has negotiated an
Employment Agreement with Mr. DeStefano. The Agreement
states that the city employs the Interim City Manager to
perform the duties and functions of the City Manager
while concurrently performing the dutiesand
responsibilities of Deputy City Manager. The Agreement
shall expire upon the commencement date of the new City
Manager. The employee shall be reinstated to the
position of Deputy City Manager at that time. The city
agrees to provide the employee with additional
compensation in the amount of $ per month, above
his existing salary, for service as the Interim City
Manager. The Interim City Manager will be provided with
the use of a City car > and electronic communication
devices, all of which shall be relinquished upon
termination of the Agreement. The City agrees to
reimburse the Interim City Manager for City. -related
expenses
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve- the Employment Agreement with James
DeStefano to serve as Interim City manager -and authorize
the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Requested by: City Council`
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
matters may be heard.
7.1 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT'-(LLEBG) FUNDING FOR -
FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 - The City received ;approval of the
its application for funding under the Bureau of Justice
Assistance's (BJA) Fiscal Year 2000 LLEBG Program in the
amount of $56,141 with the City obligated to match
$6,2`.38, for a total of $62,379. The purpose of the LLEBG
Program is to provide units of local government with
funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve
public safety. Capt. Yim of the Walnut/D.B. Sheriff's
Station, recommends that the LLEBG funds: continue to be
utilized for the D.B. Special Problems Unit/High Impact
Team Deputy. In addition, an Advisory Board has reviewed
the proposed use of funds and concurs with the
ffi
NOVEMBER 7, 2000PAGE 8
recommendation of Capt. Yim.. Prior to the obligation of
funds, a public hearing is required.
Recommended Action: It' is recommended that the City.
Council open the public hearing„ receive testimony, and
approve the recommended use of funds as requested by the
Walnut/D_B,. Sheriff's Station.
Requested by City Manager
8. OLD BUSINESS:
" 8.1 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY AND S.P.C.A. (IVHS) CONTRACT'
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 - Continued from October 17, 2000
Since Incorporation., the City has utilized Inland
Valley Humane Society for animal care and control
services. Typically renewed on an annual basis, the
latest agreement commenced January 1, 1999 for an
eighteen -month period expiring June 30, 2000. On August
30, 2000, IVHS Executive Director William Harford
submitted correspondence and a proposed contract in the
amount of $72,486, which represents a $7,242 increase'
over last year's, contract amount of $65,244. Three
options were provided including keeping the contract at
its current rate with the adoption of a new fee schedule.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that'. the City
Council 1) Approve the FY00-01 contract for animal
control services with IVHS in the amount of $65,244; and
2) Set a public hearing for December 5, 2000 to adopt a
new fee schedule as recommended by IVHS..
Requested by: City Manager
8.2 APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER AND ONE ALTERNATE
REPRESENTATIVE AND TWO COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AND TO
ALTERNATES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANTERMAN
DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - On
October 12, 2000, the Cities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and
Pomona,_ along with the Department of Developmental
Services, signed' the Statement. of Principles and
commitment related to the proposed severe behavioral
program at Lanterman Developmental Center. The Statement
specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee
to (a) assurea full and fair sharing of information and
concerns among DDS and the local communities and their
residents with respect to the ongoing operation of the
specialized behavioral program at LDC and (b) confirm, on
an ongoing basis, that DDS/LDC are in compliance with the
terms and conditions to be set forth in; this Agreement
and other legal requirements relating to the specialized
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 9
behavioral program. The Committee shall consist. of
"...three (3) representatives from the City of.Diamond 'Bar
(2) of whom will be residents who are not elected
officials or employees 'of that City or Employees of
Lanterman Developmental Center Committee.." The first
meeting of the State Advisory Committee will be held on
December 4, 2000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council appoint one City Council representative and one
alternate and two community members and two alternates to
represent the City on theStateof California Lanterman
Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee, The
City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee,
at its meeting of October 30, 2000, recommended the
selection of advisory committee Sue Sisk and Darla
Farrell as the two at-large community representatives and
City Council Member Carol. Herrera as the City Council
representative. The City Council will need to nominate
and appoint alternates for each of the three advisory
committee seats.
Requested by: City Manager
9. NEW BUSINESS:
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Next Resolution No. RA 2000-02
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman
ROLL GALL: Agency Members Ansari, Herrera,
O'Connor, VC/Chang, C/Huff
.2. PUBLIC CObt-DENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Agency on"Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the
public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your
comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally
cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted
agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the.
Agency Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary)
There is a five minute maximum tame it when addressing the
Redevelopment Agency.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES = Regular Meeting of October 17 2000
NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PAGE 10
- Approve as submitted.
Requested by: Agency Secretary
3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER Approve Voucher Register dated
November 7, 2000 in the amount of $41,548.72.
Requested by Finance Division
3.3. TREASURER'S REPORT - Submitted for the Redevelopment
Agency's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement
for September, 2000.
Requested by: Finance Division
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS None
5. OLD BUSINESS': None -
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency
Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at
this meetingor the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL, MEETING
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS:
11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMWNTS: Items raised by individual Council
Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting,
12. ADJOURNMENT:
i
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR`
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Closed Session at 5:30 p.m. in CC -8 and a
Regular Meeting at 6:30 p -m., in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality
Management District at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California on November 7,
2000.
I, Lynda Burgess declare as follows:
am the City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that a copy of the agenda for the
Closed Session and Regular Meeting to be held on November 7, 2000 was posted at
the proper locations.
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct and that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 3rd
day, of November, 2000, at Diamond Bar, California.
/s/ Lvnda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item: Please have the Council
name and address as written above, Minutes reflect my
Signature
c' -7186
e
CITIZENS FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY
Regarding Traffic:
We petition that more freeways and city streets be built
first before Standard Pacific and
Pulte build a substantial amount of homes in the Diamond Bar/Walnut area;, Since they,
are building approximately 400 homes, it would equate to about 800-1200
for our roads... creating excessive gridlock, additional=cars
Ir �
1
tib
t, V44
1t�,
r
22 02-j-
{
a
TRAFFIC ISSUES PAGE 2
TRAFFIC ISSUES PAGE 3
G..,
q , . Foos"
2-2 o 32- GdLOC-i 3ey�'s -A- tivg7 , Dwla-1
A
d,2
s
� � // /y,.+ /%//f/��,/1 �,fj�7///�,,//rd�✓�/'7lyJ��j�./jj p �/�J ��L/�/J} �//'
y
arc Eao-9 ®9
f
717r
VWW3 0
'tCCA
c�a
d
l
s
�17
TRAFFIC ISSUES PAGE 4'
-v►� C� f3
(SFO
(ceYrp, i-kK q WoLiniAt e-
G C u) 1376 ° �� 1 Co
9'72
r(a
011
Lfe3 e-
v,,A,a,AC44-1.
i
qt
-71
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James DeStefano, Interim City Managat)--p
Re: November 7, 2000 Council Meeting, Agenda Item 8.1:
Inland Valley Humane Society (IVHS) Contract for FY 00-01
Date: November 6, 2000
This memorandum has been prepared to address questions from a member of the City Council regarding the
IVHS staff report, agenda item 8.1. This item was carried..over from the October 24, 2000 meeting. Staff
contacted ]VHS Executive Director William Harford to address these concerns, particularly those regarding
auditing procedures and the method for deriving the estimated revenue figures.
AUDITING PROCEDURES
Mr. Harford stated that IVHS has an independent audit every year and has donesofor the past 52 years. The
audit is paid for by the Society and is sanctioned by the Board of Directors. The audit is not a systems audit, but
instead a financial audit to verify that income and revenue accounts are correct. Mr. Harford and the Board of
Directors review the audit. In addition, the Board meets monthly to review the level of service provided, as well
as, the monthly income and revenue accounts.
ESTIMATED REVENUE 00-01
The chart in the staff report compares FY 99-00 and FY 00-01 revenues based on revenue types. There are
concerns regarding the validity of the estimates for FY 00-01 and how those figures were derived. Mr. Harford
stated that those figures are based on trends for previous years, taking into account revenue and activity for each
category.
In reviewing the estimates in the FY 00-01 (non -canvassing year) chart, you will notice that the program costs are
offset by revenue, as well as, the City's cost. 'However, if you were to estimate revenue for canvassing year
based on the proposed fee schedule, it appears that a significant amount of revenue would be generated. Mr.
Harford realizes the revenue potential with the new fee "schedule: However, in actuality there could be either an
overage or ashortage. Throughout the years, these overages/shortages have offset each other. In future years, if
actual revenue continues to exceed estimated revenue, then the contact can be adjusted accordingly. Following
is a summary of actual costs for 'a five-year period, The figures below are taken from information submitted
November 6, 2000 by Mr. Hartford (attached):
Budgeted -Cost
Revenue
City Cost
(shortage)/overage
CY
NCY-
CY
NCY
CY
FY 95-96
FY 96-97
FY 97-98
FY 98.99
FY 99-00
$ 144,510
$ 153,353
$ 195,108
$ 138,343
$ 176,519
72,969
69,267
135,598
73,488
123-,495
59,510
59.510
59.510
62,026
65.244'
(12,031)
(24,576)
50,707
(552)
12,220
CY denotes Canvassing Year
NCY denotes Non Canvassing Year
*FY 00-01 based on estimates, all other FY's are actual
Prepared by:
Teresa Arevalo, Senior Administrative Assistant
NCY
FY 00-01*
$ 155,486
90,242
65.244
0
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
OCTOBER 17 2000 4pp
1. CALL TO ORDER: None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro
Tern Ansari.
INVOCATION: The invocation was given by Dr: James Price,
Diamond Canyon Christian Church.
ROLL CALL: . Mayor O'Connor, Mayor Pro Tern Ansari, and
Council Members Chang, Herrera, Huff.
Also present were: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney; James DeStefano,
Deputy City Manager; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of
Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance
Director; Mike Nelson, Communications and Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess,
City Clerk.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: M/O'Connor announced the receipt of a letter from
City Manager Belanger offering his resignation effective October 20, 2000. Due to
the fact that the letter was just received, M/O'Connor proposed that an emergency
Closed Session be held immediately following the Special Presentations portion of
the agenda and that Item 9.2 be added to the agenda for acceptance of the
resignation and designation of an Interim City Manager.
MPT/Ansari moved, C/Herrera seconded, to recess the Regular City Council
Meeting to Closed Session immediately following the Special Presentations portion
of the agenda, and that Item 9.2 "Acceptance of Resignation of City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger and waive 60 -day notice requirement, appointment of Interim
City Manager and authorizing staff to release a request,for proposals for a contract
with an executive search agency and declaring the urgency thereof" be added to the
agenda under New Business due to the fact'that this matter came to the attention
of the City and the City Council after the posting of tonight's agenda, and that
immediate action is necessary because of emergency circumstances.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
3. A. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.A.1 Proclaimed October 22-28, 2000 as "Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Week."
3.A.2 Proclaimed October 28, 2000 as "National Immigrants Day."
3.A.3 Proclaimed October 22-28, 2000 as "Red Ribbon Week." Presented to
OCTOBER 17, 2000
PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL ,
Superintendent Ron Hockwalt on behalf of the Walnut Valley Unified School
District and to Carol Thomas on behalf of the Pomona Unified School District.
3.A.4 Proclaimed October 2000 as "Crime Prevention Month."
3.A.5 Presented Certificates of Recognition to Community Volunteer member
Eberhard Meyer for 500 hours of service, and to Glen Plovanich for 1000
hours of service.
3.A.6 Presented Certificate of Recognition to Marissa McKendall for finding Council
Member Herrera's purse of Albertson's Market and returning it to her.
3.A.7 Presentation by Ray Anderson, Vice President, Waste Management
regarding the New Trash Collection System.
3.A.8 Deputy City Manager David Doyle introduced Todd Strojny, Senior
Administrative Assistant.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION: M/O'Connor adjourned the meeting to Closed
Session at 7:20 p.m:
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/O'Connor reconvened the City Council
Meeting at 7:55 p.m.
3. B. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None offered.
4. 4.A. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Dave Reynolds expressed concern about slope
maintenance and potential hillside failures on Diamond Bar Boulevard and
other affected areas of the City. He reminded the public to keep their storm
drains cleaned out. He asked Council to consider sending letters or to have
the City's Code Enforcement officer call on affected residents.
e
Clyde Hennessee again gave his view on certain November 7, 2000 ballot
measures.
Larry Rhodes asked Council to look into what the City can do to stop
residents from feeding their pets outside because petfood attracts vermin
such as skunks, opossums, etc.
Toni Simmons, speaking on behalf of Northminster PresbyterianChurch,
announced that on November 5, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., the
church would hold its annual Alternative Gift Market and Cultural Celebration.
Entertainment and food begins at 11:30 a.m.
William Klein spoke against adding a truck lane to SR 60.
Sue Sisk spoke about the Lanterman Agreement Principles and
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL
Commitment. She emphasized to the residents that the City would continue
to monitor this situation.
Darla Farrell registered her concern about the Waste Management pickup
issue. She lives .on a cul-de-sac street and it is difficult to place containers
on the street and she does not want trash containers in her driveway.
Dick Farrell spoke about sewer problems at his home.
4.13. RESPONSE TO PUBIC COMMENTS: M/O'Connor acknowledged Dave
Reynolds' concerns regarding hillside slopes. She has also noticed that
storm drains are filled with dirt and residents needed to be reminded that
drains should be cleaned each year. She thanked DBIA for their assistance.
DCM/DeStefano recommended that with respect to Larry Rhodes concern
about vermin, the City solicit suggestions from the Humane Society for
mitigating the problem: In addition, advice couldbe given to the community
through the City's newsletter or via a news release.
MPT/Ansari explained to Mr. Klein that SCAG is conducting a truck lane
feasibility study. To date, nothing has been determined. She suggested that
he write a letter to SCAG stating his concerns and that he attend the truck
lane task force meeting at the SCAG office on Thursday, October 26 from
10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
C/Herrera explained that the reason the SR 60 is being considered for a truck
lane is because it accommodates the heaviest truck traffic in Los Angeles
County.
C/Huff spoke about the considerations regarding a possible truck lane on the
SR 60. He responded to Darla Farrell that the Alameda Corridor East open
house is tomorrow evening from °6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Shilo Hilltop.
Specifically, the open house will address the project at Temple Avenue in
Pomona that impacts the northerly' sections of D.B.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - October 19, 2000 - 7:00 p.m.,
SCAQMD Room CC -8,21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUSINESS EXPO - October 21, 2000 - 9:00
a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Kmart Parking Lot, 249-S. D.B. Blvd.
5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION October 24, 2000 7:00 p.m., SCAOMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - October 26, 2000 - 7:00 p.m.,
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL
SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.5 "HALL OF HORRORS" HAUNTED HOUSE - October 28, 30 & 31 - 6:00 p.m.
to 10:00 p.m. - Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
5.6 LANTERMAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - October 30, 2000 - 7:00 p.m.,
Room CC -8, SCAQMD, 21685 E. Copley Dr.
5.7 FALL FUN FESTIVAL - October 31, 2000 - 4:30 p.m. to 8`30 p.m., Heritage
Park, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
5.8 COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING November 2,
2000 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Room CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.9 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 7, 2000 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.10 ELECTION DAY November 7 2000 -Polls open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
5.11 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - November 9, 2000 - 7:00
p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.12 VETERANS DAY - November 10, 2000 (Friday) - City Offices will be closed
inobservance of Veterans Day - will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000.
5.13 PLANNING COMMISSION - November 14, 2000 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.14 COMMUNITY MEETING REGARDING THE COMMUNITY/SENIOR
CENTER - November 15, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD 'Auditorium, '21865E.
Copley Dr.
5.15 CITY COUNCIL MEETING- November 21, 2000 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD
Auditorium, 21865. E Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Chang moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to
approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception -.of Items 6.8 and 6.10. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
6.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular City Council Meeting of October 3, 2000 -
as submitted.
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL
6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular
Meeting of August 8, 2000.
6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES:
6.3.1 Regular Meeting of June 8, 2000.
6.3.2 Regular Meeting of July 13, 2000._
6.4 RECEIVED AND FILED PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
- Regular Meeting of August 24, 2000.
6.5 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated October 17, 2000 in the amount
of $656,649.53. M/O'Connor recused herself from approval of P.O. 10293
for $120; Petty Cash of $14.98; All 0471 for $1,496.03; 110310 for $35.00;
109874 for $17.50; 9885 for $5,882.42; and 10495 for $1,293.34, for a total
of $8,559.27 due to potential conflict of interest regarding the Lanterman
Forensic Expansion Project.
6.6 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT- for August 2000.
6.7 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BREA CANYON
ROAD/DIAMOND CREST LANE, BREA CANYON ROAD/GLENBROOK
DRIVE AND BREA CANYON ROAD/GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE - accepted
the work performed by L.A. 'Signal and authorized the City Clerk to file the
Notice of Completion and release any retention amounts thirty-five days after
the date of recordation.
6.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2000-52 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ACTING
IN BEHALF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY GENERAL FUND, LOS ANGELES
COUNTY LIBRARY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT #10006 - DIAMOND BAR, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY FIRE-FFW THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO 21 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
AND THE GOVERNING BODIES OF CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GREATER
LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT, THREE
VALLEYS' MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, WALNUT VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT (WVWD), WVWD-IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #5 APPROVING
AND ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED, EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX
REVENUES RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 21 - approving and accepting the negotiated exchange of
property tax revenues resulting from Annexation No. 682 to County
Sanitation District No. 21 (McDonald's at 21095 Golden Springs Drive.)
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL
6.11 ADOPTED RESOLUTION, NO. 2000-53: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO ACQUIRE
FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE
AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY.
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:-
6.8 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR DOCUMENT CONVERSION SERVICES to
Prime Ventures, Inc. dba Document Imaging Service Corp. in the amount of
$79,239.08 for document conversion services for engineering drawings and
maps and building permits, with a 10% contingency for contractchanges` in
the amount of $7,923.
In response to M'O'Connor regarding security of the City's records,
CC/Burgess explained that documents will be inventoried by staff prior to
transport to San Diego for scanning and again inventoried, upon receipt by
the vendor. An inventory will be conducted again when the documents are
returned to City Hall The proposal contains a`guarantee for the safety of
these original documents.
CA/Jenkins did not believe there is any way that the City can absolutely
guarantee that nothing would- get lost, even though the possibility is remote.
The alternative is to not proceed with the project with respect to those types
of documents that cannot otherwise be copied.
M/O'Connor moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to award a contract for
Document Conversion Services to Prime Ventures, Inc. dba Document
Imaging Service Corp. in the amount of $79,239:08 for engineering drawings
and maps and building permits, with a 10% contingency for contract,changes
in the amount of $7,923. Motion carried' by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang,' Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
6.10 APPROVED A TEN-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH COAST AIR
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SCAQMD) TO LEASE OFFICE
SPACE (12,117 SQUARE FEET) FOR DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL AT AN
INITIAL COST OF $1.65 PER SQUARE FOOT - for the first two years,
escalating by $0.05 per square foot ever two years thereafter.
MPT/Ansari explained the benefits of the SCAQMD lease contract.
C/Huff also spoke about the benefits of the SCAQMD lease contract and
location. The SCAQMD facility has 24-hour security. He asked staff and
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL
Council to consider installation of an ATM at the new location to allow
residents the convenience of conducting business.
C/Chang pointed out that this option helps to offset the loss of redevelopment
agency funds. He reminded staff to continue the lease -to -purchase
agreement negotiations with SCAQMD, which he believed was approvedby
their board. He thanked SCAQMD and staff for their excellent negotiations.
MPT/Ansari moved, C/Huff and C/Chang seconded, to approve a ten-year
agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to
lease office space (12,117 sq. ft) for City Hall at an initial cost of $1.65 per
sq. ft. for the first two years, escalating by $0.05 per sq. ft. every two years
thereafter. Motion carried by the following Roll' Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
7. PUBLIC HEARING: None
8. OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY AND S.P.C.A. (IVHS) CONTRACT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 - The contract for animal control services
through the [VHS' expired June 30, 2000. IVHS has submitted a contract for
FY 2000-2001 in the amount of $72,486. This is a $7,242 increase over last
year's contract amount ($65,244). Based on the information provided in the
staff report, staff recommends that the Council approve a one-year contract
keeping the contract at its current rate ($65,244) by adopting a new fee
schedule. Continued from October; 3, 2000.
C/Huff asked that this matter be continued in order to give Council and staff
an opportunity to digest the ,materials provided and provide due diligence to
make certain that the Council's action best represents the community's
interest and concerns. He previously referenced his concerns about the
Humane Society. He asked Mr. Hartford to comment on an incident that
happened at the home of C/Huff. He again asked if those who canvas for the
Humane Society could wear a picture identification when registering an
in the field' and forego wearing a badge to which Mr. Hartford replied that
canvassers to carry a,pictured' ID and since they are classified as limited law
enforcement personnel they are required to wear a Humane Society badge.
Who 'requires them to wear , -a badge?
Mr. F arford responded that under the Codes that allow the Humane Society
to enl orce animal control contracts, the State requires that personnel wear
a badge.
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL
C/Huff asked staff to verify the State Code and reiterated that the person who
visited his home and insisted that C/Huff had a dog was not wearing picture
ID which to him is more important than wearing a badge.
Mr. Harford responded to M/O'Connor that 90%+ of the total violations are
leash law violations. Most leash law violations occur when one neighbor
complains about another neighbor.
In response to MPT/Ansari`, Mr. Harford explained that the officer who is
assigned to D.B. is also assigned to Chino Hills The officer dialogues with
Code Enforcement.
MPT/Ansari asked that Mr. Harford look into establishing an improved and
ongoing dialogue with the City.
Mr. Harford agreed with MPT/Ansari and offered to the Sheriff's Department
that a full-time educator and several administrative members are available
for presentations at block group meetings to help citizens understand
responsibility issues. As a result of AB 1755, the Humane Society has
experienced a significant increase in operational costs. In the first year that
AB 1755 was implemented, no costs were passed along to the cities. He
further stated that the Society would look into what it can do to create
solutions to the problems previously expressed by Larry Rhodes.
In response to MPT/Ansari, Mr. Hartford indicated that there have been two
or three in-service meetings to discuss issues such as those brought up by
C/Huff. The Humane Society desires to acquire personnel who provide "code
enforcement with emotion" and to find ways to get people to comply without
making there feel tike they are being interrogated or intimidated. Accordingly,
his office has had several staff changes since he last visited Council. The
Humane Society will continue to monitor these very serious issues.
Dr. Rhodes reiterated his concerns about adverse treatment of his dogs by
the Humane Society and was strongly opposed to continuing the contract
with the Inland Valley Humane Society.
Clyde Hennessee asked for the Council to continue the matter until further
information is available to the public.
C/Huff moved, MPT/Ansari seconded, to continue the matter to the
November 7, 2000 meeting and directed staff to contact other cities utilizing
the services of L.A. County for animal control services. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE -9 CITY COUNCIL
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
8. NEW BUSINESS:
9.1 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 4T" OF JULY CONCERT AND
FIREWORKS SHOW - For the past 10 years, the Summer Concerts in the
Park series has been held on Wednesday evenings from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. at Sycamore Canyon Park. In the summer of 2001, the 4t" of July falls
on a Wednesday evening. When this circumstance was presented to the
Parks & Recreation Commission at its August 24, 2000 meeting, the
Commission recommended that if a fireworks show is not a part of the 4t" of
July concert, then there should be no concert on that date. This issue was
presented to Council at its joint study session with the Parks & Recreation
Commission on September 6, 2000 and Council directed staff to agendize
this matter for a future Council Meeting. Staff has developed two options for
a 4th of July patriotic concert. Option I is for an evening concert from 6:30
p.m. to 9:00 p.m., followed by a fireworks show. Cost for Option l is about
$20,000. Option II is for an afternoon concert from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. with
no fireworks show. Cost for Optionll is about $10,000. There is also a third
option, which is to not have a concert on July 4, 2001, but instead have the
patriotic concert on Wednesday, June 27, 2001.
In response to M/O'Connor, CSD/Rose explained that staff members who
work the Concerts in the Park series consist of primarily part time staff
members who do not receive any additional compensation for working a
holiday. In addition, management staff is not compensated for working on
holidays. Therefore, the staff cost would be the same as for any other
occasion.
C/Huff continued to have reservations about spending $20,000. How can the
City restrict fireworks to its residents when the City sponsors fireworks. In
addition, the City experiences a tremendous fire hazard in July.
CSD/Rose explained that the fireworks display would be similar to the one
held during the Millennium Celebration. A lane on Golden Springs Rd. would
be closed and the fireworks would be set off from the sidewalk. The site has
been reviewed and approved by the pyrotechnics provider. Before a show
could move forward, the City would have to have further assurance from the
fire department that the site is safe.
MPT/Ansari stated that although the expense is high, the actual holiday
occurs on the date of a Concert in the Park only once in eight years. The
City has never held a July 4t" celebration and she believed that the City
needs to have something for the citizens to enjoy.
C/Herrera favored having fireworks and believed it may be a deterrent to
people setting' off fireworks in their own neighborhoods. She would like the
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL
City to sponsor a 4 1 of July celebration:
C/Chang has promoted the concept of a July 4th celebration for some time.
M/O'Connor expressed concern about the potential parking problem and how
many people the park can accommodate.
Martha Bruske stated her opposition to having fireworks, which is against the
City's Code. Sycamore Park is in a residential area and the Concerts in the
Park series impacts the surrounding neighborhoods. In her opinion, a
fireworks show in that location would be unmanageable.
Jeff Koontz voiced concern about the impact on staff of having two events,
the City Anniversary Celebration and July 4th, within 70 days of each other..
M/O'Connor asked if staff has looked into the parking situation. How many
people can the park accommodate. Where will they park? Has approval
been given by the Country Club for parking? Is Calvary' Chapel available for
parking?
CSD/Rose stated that parking is available during the evening time at the D.B.
Golf Course and the Cafe Illustrado. parking lot. Staff would expect at least
2400 people for this type of event.
C/Huff reiterated his concerns about fireworks sending the wrong message
to children and stated that he could not support a fireworks show.
In response to MPT/Ansari, CSD/Rose stated that an $8,500 fireworks show
which amounts to about a 20 minute show. If staff is directed to move
forward, arrangements will be sought for parking with the golf course, the
Cafe lllustrado location and the Calvary Chapel location.
MPT/Ansari recommended that staff seek input from adjacent residents.
_C/Herrera moved, M/O'Connor seconded, to continue the matter to
November 21, 2000 to determine the actual capacity of the site, parking
availability and receive input from adjacent residents. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
- M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
9.2 ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION OF CITY MANAGER TERRENCE L.
BELANGER; WAIVER OF 60 -DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENT;
APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND AUTHORIZING STAFF
OCTOBER 17, 2000 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL.
TO RELEASE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A CONTRACT WITH
AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH AGENCY AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF - C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to accept the resignation
of City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, waive the 60 -day notice requirement,
appoint Jim DeStefano as Interim City Manager; direct staff to release an
RFP for an Executive Search Agency, and direct the Mayor and Mayor Pro
Tem as asubcommittee to develop additional compensation for Interim City
Manager.. Motion carried by the following RollCall vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, Huff, MPT/Ansari,
M/O'Connor
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - MPT/Ansari
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: M/O'Connor recessed the City
Council Meeting at 10:00 p.m.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/O'Connor reconvened the City
Council Meeting at 10:01 p.m.
9. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
C/Herrera stated that on October 7, as President of the L.A. County Division of the
League of Calif. Cities, she conducted a League Retreat at which the Executive
Board discussed a strategic plan for the division next year, during which they
determined to promote legislation to strengthen' local control of cities and to be
aggressive about returning revenue to the cities. She was pleased that on October
12, the Lanterman Agreement of I Statement of Principles and Commitment was
signed. The document was unanimously approved by the Cities of Diamond Bar,
Pomona and Walnut. Clifford Allenby, Director of Developmental Services for the
State, has approved that Ruth Maples, Lanterman Director and C/Herrera will co' -
chair the State's Advisory Committee. On October 10, the Lanterman Advisory
Committee met with Captain Yim to discuss security plans for the Lanterman
Developmental Center's 128 severe behaviorals. She invited residents to participate
in this process. She pointed out that the Brea Community Hospital is a full-service
hospital within five miles of the city limits of D.B.While she will personally miss
Terrence Belanger and his talents, she looked forward to the challenge of selecting
a new City Manager.
C/Chang recently attended the NASA Commercialization Boards' groundbreaking
ceremonies at CalPoly, which is one of five such facilities in the United States. He
attended the President of Western University of Health Sciences' presentation
regarding his vision for the school. The school trains about 20% of the family
physicians that practice on the West Coast. He and M/O'Connor attended the
Council's joint meeting with the Pomona Unified School District during which a
dedication of Diamond Ranch High School was discussed. Dedication ceremonies
are slated to take place in January 2001. At this time, Diamond Ranch High School
has a full student body of 8th through 12th grades. Pantera Elementary School
OCTOBER 17, 2000 1 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL
construction is completed and the facility is being used for teacher supported
programs. It is likely that the school will have open enrollment for September 2001.
Last week, the D.B. Chinese-American Association, the Chinese-American Self -
Improvement Organization and Vision 21 held a seminar on Proposition 38. He
commended the organizations for their efforts. C/Chang stated that Terry Belanger
is an outstanding, capable and very knowledgeable city manager and is a walking
encyclopedia of the city's affairs. He was privileged to spend a great deal of time
with him and respected his knowledge, and is grateful for his help. He is sorry to see
Mr. Belanger leave D.B. and wishes him great success in his new venture.
C/Huff asked staff if information regarding the waste rollout program could be
provided to the public on the City's Web site. He asked staff to agendize discussion
of a plan to address hillside and drainage maintenance. He also asked staff to
address the issue of feeding wild animals and notification to the public. He spoke
about attending the D.B. High School Band competition at Nogales last Saturday.
The band will be performing in this year's Rose Parade. He encouraged residents
to support the youth who are good ambassadors for the City. On October 11, he
and M/O'Connor met with CalTrans to discuss traffic mitigation measures related to
the industry East Project. He stated that the signing of the Lanterman document
emphasizes the extensive hard work and involvement on the part of the community.
It is time to set aside the rhetoric, move forward and re-establish the close ties with
Lanterman and its clients. He wished Mr. Belanger the best in his new venture. It
is difficult to replace someone of his knowledge and stature. The measure of a good
leader is the depth within the organization, whichMr. Belanger helped to provide.
He asked the public to be patient with staff and the Council during this time of
transition. He recommended that the City present Mr. Belanger with a plaque and
related parting ceremonies.
MPT/Ansari reported that on October 4, she met with the Inland Valley Economic
Corporation, which helps small businesses to integrate into communities. Also on
that date, she attended the SCAG retreat during which the group discussed the
regional transportation plan. That evening, she attended a Calif. Contract Cities
Board meeting in L.A. On October 5, she attended the regular SCAG meeting and
board meeting. On October 10, she attended a Solid Waste meeting for L.A.
County. On October 12, she attended the Lanterman document signing. That
afternoon, she attended the Project Sister' open house. The director is seeking
volunteers. That evening, she and three other Council Members attended the
Chamber of Commerce function at South Point Middle School On October 13, she
attended the grass-roots lobby committee meeting for the League of Calif. Cities in
Sacramento. The grass-roots lobby was established to determine how the 16
regions could be more legislatively responsible to cities. On October 14, she
attended the NAACP San Gabriel Division dinner, during which three D.B. residents
were honored with scholarships. Today she attended a Water Quality Committee
meeting in L.A. at SCAG. MPT/Ansari said that she has worked with Terry Belanger
for seven ears, which were interestingand tumultuous years. Mr. Belanger
managed to guide the City through those times and took the City from a $4 million
reserve to a $15 million dollar reserve. He will be missed. D.B. will look to the
OCTOBER 17, 2000
PAGE 13
CITY COUNCIL
future and attempt to choose a City Manager with the attributes of Terry Belanger.
She asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Hal Sturim, husband of
Carol Sturim. He was a realtor and very involved in D.B. activities.
M/O'Connor joined C/Huff at the Foothill Transit Cluster meeting on October 4. She
attended Lorbeer Middle School's Back to School night during which she re-
presented their Blue Ribbon Award. On October 5, many Council Members
participated in the YMCA fund-raising Golf Tournament. On October 6, she and
C/Huff attended the Chinese Independence Day celebration. On October 11, they
met with CalTrans to discuss the Industry East Project. Also that day, a City On -
Line meeting was held. The new name for City On -Line is Diamond Bar On -Line.
On October 12, she had the pleasure of joining 10,000 women at the Governor's
Conference for Women in Long Beach. She attended the Chamber Mixer with the
Walnut Valley Unified School District and the Walnut Chamber of Commerce. With
respect to the Industry `East 'Project, D.B. received a letter from Majestic Realty
updating the City on the project, portions of which she read aloud. On October 13,
the Finance Committee met. She, was not able to attend the Saturday DBIA slope
maintenance session. She commended DBIA and all of the volunteers who helped
the homeowner. On Saturday she attended a D.B. Community Foundation seminar
training session on how to be good board members and engage in fund-raising.
During the subcommittee meeting with the Pomona Unified School District, school
officials stated they are willing to help D.B. write grants for library funding. A couple
of months ago, Assembly Member Pacheco's office issued a press, release stating
that the City of D.B. was given a $50,000 grant for a parole board museum.
Factually, the $50,000 was given to the Department of Corrections and not to the
City. Ribbon cutting ceremonies for the museum are slated for November 1, 2000.
She asked staff to pursue the sublease of the current city hall facility. She also
asked staff to address street parking on trash pickup days. She reminded residents
that a community meeting would be held on November 15 to discuss the
community/senior center. She spoke about the accomplishments of City Manager
Belanger. Personally, she felt he was the most intelligent man she had met. He
was able to state both sides of any issues facing the City Council. If he did not know
the answer to a question, he got the answer. She also looked forward to the
selection of a new City Manager. D.B. staff is very capable and will be up to the
challenge of taking the City forward. She asked staff members to lend their support'
during the long process of finding a new City Manager. She wished Mr. Belanger
success in his new venture.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/O'Connor adjourned the
meeting at 10:50 p.m. in memory of Hal Sturim.
ATTEST:
DEBORAH O'CONNOR, Mayor
LYNDA BURGESS,_ City Clerk
SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROPERTY OWNER: Eric Stone
24401 Darrin Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Nextel Communications
310 Commerce
Irvine, CA 92602
DCM/DeStefano presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04 and Development Review No. 2000-10,
Findings of Fact, and conditioi is of approval, as listed within the resolution.
In response to Commission questions, DCM/DeStefano indicated that the project was
originally approved in mud 199. Due to the concerns regarding the potential effects of this
type of project, it was, at the time, a very controversial project because it was the proposed
to be located close to single fa iuly residential properties. This was the 18'b such project
in the City of Diamond Bar and it generated more concern than all other projects combined.
Due to the issues involved, the City Council deemed it appropriate to condition the project
for a one-year termination. In mid 1998, the Planning Commission determined that the
applicants had complied with ill of the conditions set forth in the original approval and
approved a one-year extensioi with a sunset clause to August 2001. The grant did not
prohibit future applications on he site. The Telecommunications Ordinance identifies this
site as an opportunity for provi(ers of these types of services. However, it does not identify
how many sites are available at any one location. On the heels of the Planning
Commissions concerns regarding periodic review, staff has added a condition that
specifically talks about periodic. review (see Condition 5 (e), page 5). Should there not be
compliance, the Planning Commission has the ability to either modify or revoke the permit.
While this project is immediately ;adjacent to the previously approved project, it is a
separate and free-standing application. If one provider were not in compliance it should
not have an effect upon a second provider in obtaining compliance. If the Commission
wishes, it may also provide for a sunset clause. DCM/IDeStefano noted that staff received
one letter of objection from an anonymous individual.
Lynn Van Aken, Nextel Communications, stated that whether or not the approval contains
a sunset clause, in the case of non-compliance, anyone in the city may petition that the
matter come back to the Commission for review. The more sites that are on the property,
the more likely that they are to be in compliance. Except for the maintenance of the
mQnopole itself and their equipment and equipment area, all users are responsible to assure
that the vegetation hides the project and remains approved. This site is provided for the
SEPTEMBER 12, 2000PAGE PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
planned. However, he is concerned that the city is adequately protected with this type of
facility in a residential back yard.
Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.
C/Ruzicka asked if staff would respond to Roland Morris. He asked his fellow
Commissioners to consider a sunset clause for this project.
DCM/DeStefano responded to statements by Roland Morris that there are private
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this property and several hundred
surrounding properties. This use is in compliance with those CC&R's. The City does not
review nor enforce private CC&R's. Therefore, it is incumbent upon that homeowner's
association to ensure that its members are in compliance with their CC&R's. The issue that
Mr. Stone required an amendment to a couple of years ago is not an issue €or this project.
With respect to environmental impact, staff looked at this specific application for the
criteria that is generally required for an Environmental Impact Report and Negative
Declaration and the variety of exempt projects for which a categorical exemption would be
appropriate. Staff felt that this project fell into one of the many categories of categorical
exempt projects like the adjacent project. Further, staff feels that this project has followed
the requirements of the Telecommunications Ordinance including the site that has been
chosen.
Chair/Nelson encouraged the Commission to focus its discussion on land use and physical
structure.
C/Ruzicka felt that in order to be consistent, it would not be unreasonable to place the same
date on this project so that this and the prior projects could be reviewed at the same time.
At the request of Chair/Nelson, Roland Morris returned to the podium to express his
concern that there are a number of places in the City where this type of development could
occur and he is opposed to the fact that city residents can put any type of development in
their yard because of this precedent. Perhaps the property in question should be re -zoned.
VC/Zirbes said that while the project is well laid out, he is not comfortable in ;looking at
the conceptual plan where the antennas are proposed to be placed and he would like a
document that clearly indicates where the antennas will be placed and what the heights will
be in relationship to the site line from Armitos Place and in relationship to the monopoles
that currently exist. He would also like to see a better landscape plan. If the Commission
requested that the monopoles ` be no higher than the current monopoles, could the
monopoles be moved or replaced and how would it impact that structure. He would' like
to have a more definitive description of where the equipment will be placed. He would' like
i
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 PAGE 2PLANNING COMMISSION
4.2 Minutes of the August 15, 2000, Joint Study Session Meeting with the City Council.
- C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 15, 2000, Joint
Study, Session. Meeting with the City Council as presented. Motion carried by the following
Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ruzicka, Tye, Kuo, VC/Zirbes
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson
8. PUBLIC HEARING:
8.1 Development Review No. 2000-13 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request to
construct a two-story single family residence with a three-car garage, balconies, deck` and
patio cover for a total of approximately 11,729 square feet. Additionally, this request
includes a side yard retaining wall not to exceed six feet in height.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2818 Water Court Drive
(Lot 7, Tract 47850)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER/ Diamond Bar West, LLC
APPLICANT: 3480 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 300
Torrance, CA 90503
AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review No. 2000.-13, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as
listed within the resolution.
Richard Gould, Diamond Bar West, LLC, responded to C/Tye that the square footage
indicated on the plan includes liveable area only and does not include the garage or volume
in the two story entry which staff included in their square footage calculation. With respect
to C/Ruzicka's concern regarding garage space/bay calculations that the Commission has
reviewed since the current Development Code became effective. Prior to that time, 40
houses were built under the prior Code. Most of the four car garages that have been
constructed measure 36 feet wide by 20 feet deep which is the industry standard for a four-
car garage. A one car garage requires 10 foot width by 20 foot depth. However, a two car
garage does not need to be 20 feet wide because the space between the two cars has double
use. Likewise, a three car garage diminishes the required space between the vehicles.
Diamond Bar's code is interpreted to require that parking spaces must be 10'x 20'. If he is
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
DCM/DeStefano presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct
staff to prepare a resolution of denial.
: Lynn Van Aken, Nextel Communications, stated that his company's architect did not draw the
original plans to scale and he apologized' for the error. A second edition of the plan was submitted
to staff showing the antennas to be placed still above grade. Nextel's intent was that the antennas
would not be visible even with the height of the antennas beingabove grade. He referred the
Commission to a photograph and indicated that the trees would obscure the view of "anything" that
was that height. After discussing the matter with DCM/DeStefano Nextel dropped the antenna
height to approximately 1 '/2 feet to 2 feet below the pad level. With that and the existing
landscaping, whether from the street level or from the second floor level of any of the houses in the
area, the antennae will not be visible. He further referred the Commission to a Nextel RF Engineer's
statement that in moving or lowering the antennas it would diminish the value to Nextel,.
C/Ruzicka said that the project was to be placed below the street level and the fact that the applicant
did not comply with staff's recommendation left a poor impression with the Commission.. The latest
information indicates that the project is still about seven feet (T) above street level.
Lynn Van Aken responded that there is no way that there is any visibility from the street. Due to
untimely delivery by the post office, staff's report was not received in time to clear up the issue.
C/Ruzicka pointed out that because of the controversy surrounding the original project at this site,
he would prefer that the applicant reconsider this proposal ,and propose a project that takes the
neighborhood into account. The property owner has a right to develop his property to the full extent
of the code and the law. However, the property owner has a responsibility to the neighborhood. He
pointed out that Armitos Place appears to be at the 935 foot level and the top of the tower appears
to be at the 942 foot level.
Lynn Van Aken responded that "he did once." By the way, if the Commission would take staff's
original recommendation, it was for approval.
C/Ruzicka indicated- that tonight's recommendation is for denial unless the .Commission can
determine something different.
Lynn Van Aken stated he does not know what more he can do for the Commission. The intent is that
it not be visible from the surrounding homes. This property is situated so that the with the rise in
the hill the antennas are below the top of the hill and vegetation extends about 10 to 15 feet above
that.
sn
n ,
�i
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
C/Ruzicka asked if the top of the antenna is below, street level to which Lynn Van `Akenresponded
that the top of one of the antenna is right at street level and the other antenna is a'hair over that. If
you would like for Nextel to drop it more, be my guest. I'm tired. Id like to go home.
C/Tye ,said that although he was not present two weeks ago for the public hearing he reviewed the
packages. He is thoroughly confused and he is trying to make sense of the drawings. Either the
antennas are below street level or they are not below street level. The speaker commented that this
is not an optimum location.
Lynn Van Aken responded that it is not an optimum location because when the antennas are lowered
Nextel loses the coverage it needs. However, it is far better than what presently exists and Nextel
is trying to fill a hole. The antennas may, not be exactly at street level. Nextel has done its best to
try to find a blend of concealing the antennas so that they are not visible and still have the necessary
coverage.
VC/Zirbes stated that staff's report presented to the Commission on September 12 outlined the
parameters of the project. Nextel's first presentation did not indicate elevations of the existing
monopoles and/or the proposedmonopoles, nor did those diagrams provide the Planning
Commission the exact locations of those poles in relationship to the existing poles which were issues
that the Commission addressed with the applicant. Because the Commission did not receive an
answer regarding these concerns, the Planning Commission continued the matter and directed Nextel
to return to tonight's meeting and to provide the Commission with information as to the exact
heights in relation to existing monopoles and where those monopoles would be placed in relation
to existing monopoles. On Friday, he reviewed the set of Nextel plans as well as, staff's
recommendation to deny the project. Upon review of the information regarding elevations and Sheet
C-1 which indicates the different grade elevations which still does not provide him with the exact
placement of the monopoles on the project site in relation to the existing poles. Staff and the
Planning Commission had always indicated that this was below street level project. On Friday, the
Commission 'received a set" of drawings' that clearly indicates that this is not below, street level
proposal. Tonight, the Commission was presented with a set of drawings which indicate that the
proposed monopoles exceed the elevation of the street level and still do not provide the Commission
with the requested information of monopole placement. The Commission needs to be able to not
only provide the property owner with the best project possible, it also needs to be certain that the
property owner will not be caused any undue grief. Nextel's proposal is to triple the amount of
antennas located on the site. The Commission wants to make certain that the residents on Armitos
Place and that the surrounding area will not be impacted in any form or fashion - that this will be an
invisible project. The elevations do not make sense. He further pointed out his concern about the
untimely dates of the documents submitted to the Commission. Based on his request to Nextel and
the fact that he has not received answers to his requests that the applicant provide information
V
1
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
regarding the exact height and location of the antennas he cannot find information that leads him to
trust the numbers supplied to the Commission. He does not understand' how a project that is so
important to Nextel can be delivered to staff and the Commission in this manner.
Lynn Van Aken placed responsibility on the architect for not supplying accurate drawings and
apologized to the Commission. He did not have time to review the plans before they were forwarded
to the City's staff and Planning Commission. The elevation is below the pad and a few feet above
the street. The project is not visible and it meets the intent of staff's requirements.
C/Ruzicka said that based on the fact that Mr. Van Aken states that he was so upset by what the
architect did with the plans and that the architect will no longer be employed by him, he does not
trust the information received from the applicant.
C/Tye pointed out that staff's report of September 12, 2000, clearly `states in summary that Nextel
Communications has applied for a Conditional Use - Permit for an unmanned wireless
telecommunications facility to be placed below the street level. Nothing in the report confirms Mr.
Van Aken's statements about a "pad." Staff's report for tonight's meeting clearly states "to be placed
below street level." The Minutes of September 12, 2000, Public Hearing meeting, indicate that the
Planning Commission "would like a document that clearly indicates where the antennas will be
placed and what the heights will be in relationship to the site line from Armitos Place." Clearly, the
applicant has not responded to the Commission and he has no confidence in the materials that the
Commission has been asked to review.
Lynn Van Aken recommended that the Planning Commission continue the matter to allow the
applicant an opportunity to provide drawings in accordance with the Commission's request.
VC/Zirbes that the information delivered tonight is dated July 6, 2000, and it indicates that existing
antennas are mounted on eight foot (8) tall pipe mounts. Those monopoles are 22-24 feet high.
Therefore, he has no comfort with the submission and he does not need any additional time to look
at the proposal that was submitted.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial. Motion carried
by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Tye, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson
AUGUST 10, 2000 PAGE 3 T&T COMMISSION
trails. The informationfor the recreational trails is pending. Asa result, the scheduled joint
meeting with the barks and Recreation Commission will be scheduled for September.
2. Wash ngton Street Permit Parking Status.
DPW/Liu reported that today, the City of Industry installed parking signs along the easterly side
(Metrolink) side of Brea Canyon Road which will accommodate approximately 65 vehicles and
hopefully relieve overflowparking on Washington Street and other interior streets. The red
curbing is still visible. The Park N' Ride lot will be expanded by 400 parking spaces as part of the
rough grading for the Industry East Project.
3. Golden Springs Drive/Temple Avenue (Avenida Ranchero) Traffic Signal.
DPW/Liu stated that this matter came to the city as a request from the residents who reside in the
town homes on the northerly city limits border. Currently, staff is in communication with the City
of Pomona because that intersection is within their jurisdiction and those jurisdicational issues will
have to be resolved before further action can be taken. This matter will likely be scheduled as a
future agenda item when these issues have been resolved.
XII SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY MEETINGS AND EVENTS:
As agendized.
DPW/Liu stated that on Tuesday, August 15, the City Council will hold its first joint meeting with the
Planning Commission. On September 5 a joint meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission will
take place. The City Council has requested a joint meeting with the Traffic and Transportation
Commission for 4:30 p.m. on September 19, 2000 in Room CC -S, SCAQMD, 21865 E. Copley Drive.
The Commissions list of goals and objectives will be scheduled on the agenda. ' If there are any other
matters of mutual interest related to traffic and transportation issues those items can be scheduled for
discussion.
VC/Virginkar indicated that if for any reason Commissioners have a scheduling conflict, please submit
your questions, comments and concerns in writing in advance of the meeting date.
C/Kung'requested a copy of the Traffic and Transportation Commission's list of 2000/2001 FY Goals
and Objectives.
DPW/Liu stated that the City Council will adopt its Goals and Objectives for the current fiscal year
SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 PAGE 3 T&T COMMISSION
C/Istik said it makes sense to him that there should be no u-turns in that area.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
HEARING BOARD ROOM OF SC.A.Q.M.D.
21865 Copley Drive
SEPTEMBER 28, 2000
6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Finnerty called the meeting to order at 6:12 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairman Anis.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Annette Finnerty, Vice Chairman Patty Anis and Commissioner Mark St.
Amant.
Commissioner Marty Torres arrived at 6:13 p.m.
Commissioner Jeff Hull arrived at 6:33 p.m.
Staff: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services; Gary Olivas, Recreation Superintendent;
Marsha Roa, Community Services Assistant and Marisa Somenzi, Administrative
Secretary.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE None Offered.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1.1 Minutes of August 24, 2000 Regular Meeting.
1.2 Minutes of September 5, 2000 Joint Meeting with the City Council
C/St. Amant moved, VC/Anis seconded, to approve the Minutes of the August 24, 2000 Regular
Meeting and the Minutes of the September 5, 2000 Joint Meeting with the City Council as corrected
and amended. Motion approved by the following Roll Call vote:'
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: St Amant; Torres, VC/Anis, Chair/Finnerty
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hull
it
SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 PAGE 2 PARKS & REC COMMISSION
2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
2.1 Recreation Report
RS/Olivas presented staff's report for the following events:
1. Youth Baseball
2. Cross Country
3. Youth Basketball
4. Adult Basketball
5. Adult Softball
6. Adult Volleyball
7. City Employees Softball Tournament
8. Special Event - 2nd Annual Hall of Horrors and Fall Fun Festival
9. Recreation Guide
10. Contract Classes
2.2 Parks Maintenance Update.
CSD/Rose presented the parks maintenance update.
The Commission scheduled the following park visit schedule:
Date Park Commissioner
10/9/00 - 9:00 a.m. Heritage Anis
10/16/00 - 9:00 a.m. Summitridge St. Amant
10/6/00 - 9:00 a.m. Sycamore; Canyon Hull
10/20/00 - 3:00 P.M. Paul C. Grow Park Torres
11/16/00 - 9:00 a.m. Ronald Reagan/Starshine Finnerty
11/2/00 - 9:00 a.m. Peterson Finnerty
10/16/00 - 10:00 a.m. Maple Hill St. Amant
'I
*11/10/00 -
9.00 a.m. Pantera Hull _
*Holiday — Need to re -schedule
I
SEPTEMBER 28 2000 PAGE 3 PARKS & REC COMMISSION
2.3 Capital Improvement Program Update.
a. Skate Park
CSD/Rose stated that renovations are underway and the park will re -open on Saturday.
2. Pantera Park Ball Field Lights
CSD/Rose reported that the light poles are slated to be delivered to the park site by October
9, 2000.
Barring complications, the work is anticipated to, take approximately two weeks.
2.4 Diamond Bar Community Foundation - Oral Report.
_Chair/Finnerty presented"the report. The Foundation will hold a training seminar on October14
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. She asked if the City could provide an overhead projector and screen
for use at the seminar.
3. OLD BUSINESS:
4. NEW BUSINESS:
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: VC/Anis reported on this morning's City Anniversary subcommittee meeting.
The vendors will be set up by 11:00 a.m. A community relations member of the Walnut Valley Unified
School District is going to attempt to have some of the schools to have game booths and be more involved
in the festivities. The picnic will be from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m. and the rides and food booths will remain
open until about 7:00 p.m.
C/St. Amant stated that for the Anniversary celebration, the Sheriff's Department, along with the Fire
Department and Highway Patrol will probably have a 12 to 15 vehicle parade from the south end of town.
Banners on the sides of the vehicles' will announce the anniversary celebration. He reported that the hockey -
court is still available to be purchased.
`
CIT': OF, DIAMOND 2F±R
fid! DATE= 11/0112006 17:01;4.9
VOUCHER REGISTER
PACE; 1
DL _THRUk 11't7 ° }tet
REPAID
FL 1D fvECT r+ ,T -PR CT -SCC,
#
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
AMOUJ1T' DATE ChECr,
mic
cHELLE APRIL
001-23002—
51208 Rc!i#r PK 1EP —S{l„ CYN,
�^jEj a:3�;
TT�ET(;L I EPIUDS '
.00
T,.G Li3!ETR_ {t�;_,_.HERS,_
Ss;Oi;
TOTA11- ZLE VEND
5ti . ti+ti+ .W,t,
MARY ANN ACA E iiia
1
51227 REFUND F*. DEP-R REAGAN
TOTAL PREPAIIS
TC:r j1 EL': 'HERS
'
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
50. 00
ADOBE SYSTEMS
C!jslts5 11
• 5--
f1e
1: F ,7 ASN AL TECH SEjF'F4 T
279.00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
x
TOTAL VOUCHERS
399.00
TOT AlL DUE tE}.dLOMR
AAX S_ RAP4I S INC
1007
7' 51 SUPPLIES -.NAME PLATE
TOTAL FR;-EPAIIES
,,fir,
TOTAL �rj HERS
I .62
UTIAL DUE VENDOR
14,22
POP 'i._RICAN YOUTH -SOCCER C: .GAUnTI1?N
0114010-42355--
Dr..S ;Ir TIOFd Ems:- }PFRT
150 60 11/07/2W0 46573
TOTAL PREPPAIDS
150.00
TOTAL L VGUUCHRRRTOTAL
DUIE VEINIMR
IS0.00
c EE ANINt' nfflnrLLi
CHRISTINE
0015251,
CONTRACT CL SE FALL
�276.0
TOTIAL 1- EFAI IS
TOTAL Y'GL{CHERS
+ 4 x �Ia+.•
270
TOTAL DUCE VENDOR
',6.00
PATTY ANIS
..
F t, R COMM , i•:
�a3
TOTAL F'REPAIDS
x!�,
TOTAL YUCH.ERu
90.01,
TOTAL WE VEIMIDO
c 8471 ROUT CONSULTANTS
ANTS
C`tl4;?;-T424 -'
102°l
SEPT SVCS„ Et'"EF FRET' S!.'a-sEPT G:3
0 .00
TDTPL PPEPA 196
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
900.00
TOTAL LEE.:k1r-NDOR
510. Gv
f
CITY OF DIAFIOPE! EPR
FUN DATE= 11/01/ ;MO 17a01'=49
VOLEC EF REGISTER
PAGE., 2
DUE THRU. 11/07/20,00
'rOtlif SE T-AC.T . ` 0 SECT -PED'
PO 4 INVOICE LEECRIrTlM
:. PFEpAin - - -
O iNTDATE CHECK
AT&T
0014090 42 ,5__
•r---
_ -
O ;�
9'}9f :�J�.'M LO'a.: DIS -1 CHARGES
16 79
J
0014001-4212-75-
0140 4125--
LONG DIS.. CHARLIE_
142.
��
�� r�r e
u 4 r.---
00140195-42125—
LON6 DIST r� ARBES
,sit
5y 7i
ail4M-42i',15-
a}". a' 15-43 LONG DIST CHARGES
L��
,7. 8
t:
001401190 421d --
LOW 1 DIST CHARGES
.4u
65.55
(I014090-4' 125--90939
1/ LONG DISCHARGES
4 -42125--
( 190
LONS DIST CHARGGFS
81.66
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL V UCHEF5
399.5
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
399.55
��7 t 7
AT, WIRELE.�'S
x:14 15-42125--
CELL.CHARSER-V/ ASRDL
59.25
C }?4D 10' <125—
CELL LFARGES-PE-VERA!
-
172=59
ii6441t 42125--
CEi L CHPRGES-SHERIFFF
;.
;ER
0014030-4:2125— 43'25--
CELL CHARD -CITY MANAGER,
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TD`AL VOUCHERS
- 294.67
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
?94.E.
Eki' SE Gti <i
L2 ,
LI_i.J� ifJLS: i..
_
.
PECREAT I ON REF►JFJD12
; D(
TOTAL PREPPIDS
„(t
TOTAL, 11DUCHERR
12,E
"CTA; 11M VENDOR
12,x'
BEST LIC!- INS
00 i'5322 -4y
{
i r.�.75sL TGr 77 MAINT P,EAGAN PAR;,
694,21
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.Li
.30
TOTAL VOUCHERSS .
694.21-
TOTAt DUE VENDOR
694.21
BEST WESTERN H-ArIENDA S"JITES-OPOWN
12644111-123,40—
POLICE CONF-zF.1-41NERY/DODO
1,Di4.D0
TOTAL PREPAIDR
•tal)
TOTAL. VGUCHEPS
17094.00
TOT AL D7!, VENDOR1,
094> :�i
CIT} OF DIAM0 D EAP;
RUN DATE: 1.1101/2000 17.101:49
'VOUCHER REGISTER
PAGE:
CLUE THRU. 11107ri.000
F131�lf'SECT-PC,CT-PRDJE1T-ArST PG #
I DICE .
DEFDIPTiD
PREPAID
AMC iiT . GATE CHECK
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRO? Ucs
,�yccjf41 fJ J"
PC 10408
SPP° IE�_�;1ELIC-`�t'.S
�.L3
riYi.=:=rY 4i si4k--
Pi' 104E
Sc=PPL
0014Cft 44 i -
J, _
PC 10408
SUPPL1ES-GENIERAL 60V i+
iGf� tl�
0014090-41200-
('� a ;k
PL 1 +401.
L J� ft
SL'.PPLIES CE";i;;AI G i�JT..
1�k[dX,•'
0015350 -;4t_00 -
PC
T40CRED1 CEMG-s mS!
-E. 15
r
t.Jt t15 +,J-41200
.,Pit 10408
'SUPPLIES - 3J. -.i. qy��
e c
00155.-C, 41200--
P3 10408-
SGP?_Ire € "i . SV r�[•
L:7
t.•
45.72
0015_:°0-412CJ0--.v
1040£
SUPPLIES - COMIM. SVCS
n r;
38.s:_
P' 1'`4-06y
SLLIES` -
}
CC, .. SJrR
f s
001515. 41 OO--
PO 104018
SUPPLIES RECREATtCits
1, 7cJ
nt,:14090 41200--
h hn
1t.4t,-;,
_
ElIF i_IES CiElh E GOVT
11.50
001525f A1122, 0-
nPC
PC€ 1ak4.iJ�; ,
j�"'++����GCi r�h41A: .. Svcs
7S 3[ i LIES ` L•Jf iiiaYL
161,if4
301T00tk 41 �it(J-
PC 104'`__
SU'PP'LIES - CITY MANAGER'
40.08
i �ti4, t �1 a,, ;__
PLS 1ti4o?
SUPPLIES - GENERAL CLEF
277,e?
0Q1531t' 41 { J--
Kn 10408
SUPPLIES _ FECREATION
266.;5
Pit 10408
SLIP Pi IES - COMM. SVCO,
X1.95
0`0 15 5 4i" __
PO 104CB
SUPPLIES - COMM. SVCS
es�14J,FtY 41°tJCJ--
"PLIES
SiERAL. GOVT
-
t 1rr
PO 10-14
t}; , LIES - G t+.,- L SOVT -
.J2/
14.49
00152350-41-200-
Y. '
PG 104Ct
SUPPLIES - COMM, %ics
55„ �
C10114090-41200-
PC 1040°
SUPPLIES - CtENERAL MVT
92.10
W15350-41200-
104=
SUPPLIES _ cair, SriS
11.89(1j5_.3.0
41 tJ; --
PO 10400
S!r'PF! IES-RECRcATICr197,34
lni55i{i 1 t __
PO 10408
SUPPLIES.7 PUBLIC WORKS
7� -
[;('s f�:Sti 41 f ^Jit --
r ;1 t040°
,.
SUPPLIES --- PLANNING
,e.62
i�t�h.liS
0 140 41 00-
10400SUPPLIES-CITY
MANArGER
15.40
?15v10 =-
PSC i 0401
IES -PUBLIC WORKS
157.730
t r j tt 4ti + �-
-C 10406
SUPPLIES - PLIBLIC WORKS
25,6.5f
gory^
10403
SUP, LIES -FEC ATIO"
7.9S
,
POi 12
tPI-S-PUB1 ORvS)
{'
rJktz
tC1t_
Vvl
P3 104, 08
,` UPPLIIES-f[7.ECREATI.Gtq,
ug
P` 104+t_'
�_
SILT T+'e-r.iaAid.,i:.
-
..
:+:a74:
P'�I 1iJM1
`- rLrttnL G1�1}`�•
SUPPLIES c�ni
,.
177.48
toi jc+s. 4 1.--
PC 10 Ch.
SLIPPLTES-R-rl't-
r tnsa�sn
t ,
Si_t<4> 4:,T{ "FM. tER
74.93
J 4t u:_-
fir, t,l4{,P.
pp, I= COMM '. I"i� iNG
16.11
0101400s-41200--
PO 1'i4
ii_SCO M^ ;IN"
?
14 55
?1j._:.+ 1y J:
1048.0
PIES-PEaR_TIC�I'
=,rllt
TOTAL PR;EFAIDS
.00
D OTAL VO!U CrE:R
'
TOTAL DUE VB@OR
-
3,2 '7v. ;1
MCPS -A. H ', B0RUA
3 1
CCWTFACCT CLAS -EA!_L
15�' • �j
TO [ PREPrly5
TOTAL sULS
150.00
t OTPL CUE &i•1I=OR
150.00
IAN :W EE
x_411- _s4'--
PEP: ItIEi-BH'1„ TRA Ir?It1Cz
�
"-' 75
TOTAL P+`EPAIlls
TOTAL VOUCHERS
6,,
,r_5
T OTAL DUE VENDOR-
CITY W: UTAtw BAR
RUNDATE. 1110112M 17.01.45
V�UCH�R MOISTER
`AGE= 4
DUE THRUM W07/20M,
PL!'!'JII,SEC-A;'1CT--ROJECT-ACCT PC,,#
IPv7I3ICE DIESCRIPTTgt
PREPAID
AMOUNT LATE
CHECK
!vt
't 15:5 -41
9C5062 :7 SUPPLIES -ADULT -TB LL7Sa1
_
TOTAL PREP ID}y ,
6 lii�i �,I17
,00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
78,16
TOTAL AL DUEE VENDOR
LESLEY ANNE BUFFUM
SOLS° REFUND P€' DEP-HERITAGE
2%,00
TOTAL PREPAID'
.
TOTAL VOUCHERSi�)0.00
TOTAL DUE VEMDOR
1100). 00
CAL IFREQ ASS" OF SANITATION A, lk ,
NPDES CU:" 1 TL1,HC'Lc 11/13
�a,Of"
TOTAL PRE AIDS
,�#1
TL'TAL VilUCHU
SCf,%Cz
TG i AL DUEE MiTIGRt
0. �;
CP;LIFC-PNIA PUBLIC 11;tCT0 R
}
rt 14C3 42 i fj--
1'a12A593-91 (,tCi i
_ a CPQ ia. ti DIRE
-Cf�iP5
..•
TOTAL PREPAInS
.40
TCTAL y4a�C! EFS
455
TOTAL SL'E }:EiT_a
45Sa9
GALS NSE NC
_
i0
,oar 3 TtsL;-L�jE BLerr;
�� mT ��
4tI',25
TOT AIL PREPAID
,
.{fit
TOTAL VOUCHP,
r�
Ly40',25
TUT?L DUE VER Do
1 y 4C7. L
LHS,.LIE SA,J.IA CaF._^PF
IT SJ?PL-5 ?EtRIFF• g CRTL�
Y 1'_Jt3;; itio i 46t76
y
TCTAL PPEPAICS_8.3.5
T n 3 AL Vu7dr ERti
.tk
7 T D ��rr
TOTAL C {rEiV �0
SUPPI SF HA LOWIEE 3 uj�ic
v CC, 1! 107 46574
TOTAL PREPAID
525a/p00
"si
Leinl ei.l'
TOTAL :SUE VC�Ii:'CN
55.00
C` IOI LE ,. HADVEl s � .?t S a f IG
_vJ• 1_= ��r=f- 1v �i
170 E'RGM: C, PrLS-D/ i r .
MURS
i .•�
633. tis
TnfA' PREPAIDS
,
aGC�
TOOL 0 UCHER9
TOTAL DUE VE ID
,U_
2,vL.:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE: 11/01,120M 17:01.49
VOUCHER REGISTER
PAGE, 5
DUE THRU: 11/107/ Ty.,
FUP'ILiSECT-ACCT-PRO>tECT-ACCT
PI3 #
INVOTCE DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT . DATE CNEC};
CINTAS CORPORATION
00-15310-42130
F•,i C.C1C4
34
15033, 84 UNI FORK T#:�,L-C!S €�•InI1�.
I
S.
1� 06
JS {.J�--
! ri Ute? ail �.
2{x-:,66
{ {. {.{ j� p 7.� y
la m?4142 UPtIF�`1 t�TL-Pi A 3S 1�. ,
z .
� 1.. c
0015554-41130--
ID v
_ 84
1 0 �� L UNIFF, F`1dTL-P •`I M.20{26
11.75
2"-'fj 3
151032-114; UNIFOPUM RNTL-C: - I o"109
TOTAL MEMOS'
.:JCS
TOTAL 3 AL VOU HERS
TOTAL DUE VENrUR
58.47
CITu; CLERKS ASSOC OF CALIF r.-:NiA
31—_
i50 j4i4 42315
C a n:PDUES- BR_ ESCRB3
20,5.01
TOTAL 7 , AID
I4.iI .'''FL IY-S.ifJL;';ER�`
ilCi'•
'205, 00
OTA DUE {ENDDR
,ii fU a 00vI
OF
'? OF LA:'ER°IE
00F 4t 2 454s =__
SEPT �0 PRKG CITE HRGv -SEPT'1,0,�
TOTAL PPEPAI85
i
TOT A' VOLICHERS
TOTAL DUE .VENDOR' '
7.00
CITY TRAFFIC 'ENG1NEE'u ASS 0'CI ON
00I5 42 21--
[TEA CONF-JGE,ILS'I,ISTICF:
X75,00 11/07/2000 ' 4F5 �
xl2 ,.
TI AL LF;EPAIDu
2 5,00
`
TOTAL VOA, L HERS
.DO
�1
TOTAL DUE VENDOR'
27.T'r.. �
—Y:T:ss �
CO E ss t SURTES
r E
-
'0557'DBCF
?.TG - 23/14; U:7
667,92 22/0712rYD) 46Z65
TOTAL PREPAID
66]ay
TO f A�_ .'1O1EER5
.04 f
TOTAL DUE^VENDOR
_66792
1M.rtU IE CRUO!"'
3.4'E'--
438YREC ErTIO"REFU"x0,
.ra00
TBTAL PRE ATDS
t�l -
T .Tnf tt'1!,CL�r�
sS7.r.L >.R
39 V0.
DL
TL:3 Ae- D'a.i iSEkQOR
SC! l+� iii -.
39.00
"r i 4050- 41,;15--
a --:,n
rlit.r AP1.; ! DUEF'-D1,'Ui r,12/01
100. 00
TOTAL PRE_PAID'S
a{1�
TOTAL VOUCHERS
TOTAL DUE_VFNDOr?
100.00
C�vtlHli-r�LLISGhI CORPORATION
00A409041200--
4536-3 PNINILMAINT-Ct; PFiEFD"ATIIR
341.40
TOTAL PREPAIDB
,DG ;
TOTAL V13UC14EPS
341.40
TOTAL DUE ;:ENDOR
341.40
CITY OF UTAM-NC EPs:
vt lt}'k3E. !l?01 2000 17:01=49
IER REGISTER
:bF'faCE' f:. -
�'#,Y{.alu
DLE HRL a
Crf I DE
k; ..,CCI' CC -I L :EC ECCE
i.d29L{iJL'vT-4ir..E Fi�3t`.? f�Y:i+:+
?a y'.
f SF Taii'�i+i
�..(-MIC- -DE ^j^T'10N
i�isiLllrt la:+ii
jll!"KII *ATE C•P
t7!i;,Sv!?i 1.'::iL' ~i'
.D J ENDINEER IN
t11Y4`) 4;y":--
12)303
2b0-ODB-11 Bk.-LIsCfJCTi Sv ' /ll-- loA8
4Z8,2Y2.278
27
n
TOTAL F�F..IDcS
.CIO
TOTAL VOUC Y:_ :-5
48,222.28
MAL DUE VENDOR
448;,222.28
MICHEL-t DA EEY
0Ol535U 4!— fk'e__
1O. 1"
CM14T1''`ACT,iL
700.00
TMIAL FREEPAISS
.00
TOTAL VOUCRERE
700. 0 ;
TOTAL-Ik'UE YEDiMOR
- 700. Vsk
CA' r. MITE COPY CENTER
0015350-42140— _
PRINT E CCE-CPJT C #p,[,E�.
-`,7L;
0015535-0-4-211
PRINT ... L•J H,L L?1-.EEM ,.V;d:
..=Ya6.
v;,3,{.ail0 -}..1:.�',--
10:1;.
�?��?iE. PRiNT SVCS PLNN ESMik"I !STI_
336.90
:i= 4,... if'-'_
fl >tT E1ES xir:,RRW
75a78
'.
`sG l;':L P1EPrasit
.i: i A L VOUCHERS
5211.10
TOTAL LJE. VENTBOR
_ 521.10
BE x _`S kn
001 `23002—
51120-A REFUND Pt-, CEER-R Rr BAN
50.00
''a ' M,.EPAIDS
00
TOTALUC RS
50.00
# LTPL IDUE VENDOR
50.00
S -
C 4040-444.:;��
��'.t:...
L`;.A;iO.., •n M10117,
W0.00
to a e.
?.i_:..k.k-.. .,,_�-_
'5553
A1G1;i
; . s� _ e 7'• { -. t • �_
PER1O:i FRC�Y..,`LJ P�,Rj 10 1t •
-3I}M
fI
f2.1 r`.;i. �;`_ _`.'-_
}�•' _
1k. fa'
TTF{{ri rci^; plRn +}7�+-__rcC �i'
1+L-4a1 .: LL Lc.'i.•? TTO ?/221
1010'.00
Vt,_`.•:
tt-'.i:Jt-.u�Vir{+�J+.
'R C 1 =' F -,RDF. JcS--E/., :"ITC 1/28
80. 00
oi.Y�14,,k 44rlo1 __
no
{102, k�•'_
DECCIOD1 .. i3iOF.S��L,}'S-Li.., R -DA 1{J"03
x60.00 ,
1.Y' 3
3EP-ITF101..2 PROF. SVEs- MUST RY EAST
60. '
ik 4431;(..-
-r•r =
1 ir'.'
..:.�
LA Eke 0 ROPE CS: � I . l 17
�r..�.1,: PROP. - PTE€�11�kF� 7}1t-
}
9Q.C1�=
TCTct PRE
11-1 NL VOUCHERS
.
TOTA I=UE VENDOR
8.3111
{17-
:
L-ART',-1-tiYT C1TF:: SIS'FORTATION
��pp { '-
w,t. Jv,:.'{' -s,a,....-
: :{f
1:.i..
I �` t ,- I 1.2•.
i�,1 SON' MIDI.,. WGI kms"' f
4r •..._..
01 _`E
TOTAL FRE.Pi DIS
.00
TOT -L : I�� #.Lt:J
5
TOT ;MOTE V: map
981„25
--
GC MTG -EESTCF hr
cn 27�� 4L75
J)C= " .
TOTAL PREPAIDS
50. Or)
'F Lffp.L Vn E CCE
¢(ri”
TOTAL SJE VENDOR
50. DO
RUM DATE: ?fr01/i0t73 171-01M!
HEIR REGISTER
PAGE, ,
PREPAID
FUNDISELT-ACCT-PROJECT-.AS-1T
PD 4
INVOICE LE;C RIFT ION AMOMUNT DATE C}?ECK
- DIF BAR AUTMOTIVE
0015210-42200—
523- TIRE REPLEUMNT-CIENFFD EH
4•}
T:DTt L `REPAID
d 00
IOTA rClCF RS
431.59
-
70
GTAL DUE Ery�
431 .59
DIAMOND, p?F CHAMBER, aF CBMIMIERICE
10573
15l"o �L?3Sv-TN4; Pl.EJIL;�?;G,S PT
b.,tri 00 11/0-7120010
465-17
CIO 14ffh. 45000--
094 C��:rit lH ilX6-1}L•L f+ir-,}
_ t 0 0., 1,;t] 11/0-712000
'.4CWl '
(V014010-45000—
9'4 COM fill REI-s'M-Mii Y 99
75.00 11/07/000
46581
TDT�:L F �P" ^:
TOTAL ND'u' 1':ERE
.00
TOTAL DUCE VENDOR
7,075.00
DIAMOK13 BAR REDEVELOPMENT PC ENCC Y,
1001-13150--
RDA 11077 ADVANPi TL RD -if/tt7!�?��
41, 48.72 if/07/200v
RDA ll0:i
TGT PREPRIDS
41,54E.72
-
-
TOTAL lJOUMERS
.00
TOTAL D?'zE: '.fitMLAR^,
82,548.71
DID': M u4F;'ROOFINGG
REFUND REFUNDS - PERMIT IN5t.'FA"-'CE
20.00
001-34350--
;EFLJ.D REFUND -'SMIP FEE
.40
REFUND REFUND - PERMIT 'FEE
60.88
TOTAL PPt" PRIDE
.00 ,
-
TOTAL VOUCHERS��jj
81.28
. .
TOTAL AL ..DUE 'VENDiDR.
t 1.. ro
D1r ,4.D{ BARM t ��� r5s A
a_5-v+,i- .LJ.
02 13
P PT{_
v-, x , il'vCvf, AFTER Sr SET
i,U64 0
-
TOTAL t��`�t..S
2,664.00 , 1S
-,.�.1-".ga.
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
27W.00 [�� 0
l!,.s3i`!Mr_ r+;ni,i„t 3'i.MI Li.UDxEE-.,LIU.�'i
Al,10 4+356 _ -
[ �� }
SMINvi}7 {y`j IP-AUCTIM 10 i
�+ ) (� i�
00. Ji -i 1111107£siY3i+
4656!
TOTAL P AIDS
500,00
TOTAL `
..
TOTAL DQE:VENDOR...
500.00
00 , .
ci221f4 REFUND PK' ; DEP-P RE€GAN
50.0
TGTAL FrREPA1DS
TMAL VOl "HC ,F
50. 00
Ta7AL DUE VENMOR
50.00
L t '_. " y. IEif PFTRANSIT INC
afi ^x4. -A 529--
-1
1036.
i'0112,1100 ;.: DRIDE SVC -S-9/1-9/15/00
16,230.83
TO!TH Pp PAIDS
000
-
TOTAL irin�i�DI'iiv-R`S
1!•'"236=•i
: Til 4 AL DUE: VG;Yi1S7G.'.
1.6 230 J.:
CITY OF DIAMOND DP°
RUN GATE' 11101,200V117=01.49
VOL'C4ER REGISTER
PAGE
DUE THRU I. 11107, 20001
r^REPAII
FilMU/SEC!-ACCT PRU;_'ECT-KCCT
PLj #
? ��GICE iiESCRIPTIO AMOtNVT` DATE MCI!
Dccumiw IM:4uI c, SERVrIivE CORP.
0014040-44030—
1039,
Liz: ANL SUPPRE-IMAGING SYSTEM
L,090.00
TOTAL PREF TDS
vtr
TOTAL. . VE.OUrt HERS
8,090.00
TOTAL DUE W11
8,0��O.UO
DIANE DODD
1264411-r 40-
PER. DIEM-IACP COMP
323.75
TOTAL PEPP,IDS ,'
.00
TOTAL UOL HERS
323.75 ,
TOTS_ LuE VENDOR
L22..75
DO` DIALERS, ll.�
4;3[;U_-
0015-35-45300—
104+ ..
CONTRACT CLASS FALL
65.00
45._00-_
1011
CONTRACT CLASS -FALL
160.00
DOTAL PREFAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
.00
TOTAL e t 01up;•
'225.00
DA ID YL E
{' ,$ 4.03 j 41.,_ 3':�"
R IMM-LAEOR S` MPSM 10/ 516
12.5., 47
•_�
EI 3
¢'-U°IA �Ot1F 30112,1
lc.'3E F
TOTAL IP DS
.Gita
IOTA. '4a ,�HE
1 :.'7
TOTAL AL DOE VENOM
291.77
PATCH
444.00 11107/2000 4+5580
TOTAL FIRE
v+E vaME
444<00
ry
! O S A '?
� !Ci�R
s 0
TOTAL € LIE VEMMOR
444.00
A ` A_7*_
t
001 -234720- -
1321Y.313 PUPEATION REFUND
317.04E
TOTAL > r.Et`rI iS
.00
TOTAL VUUC�frRS
117.00
TCk UE VENDOR
117 a 0v
Cir if- UP !'e�L:�-'i«
, L,: AL ,: :.�uv
ft , E, ZLLO
556084606 EXPRESSNAIL-GENBRAL GOVT
14. 02
90-41t ; ,
_:_9L=4: 5 8 EXPRESS '?AI' B NBRAL Gv'tT
16 .05
0-:014090-42212-0—
:3 yEtERuGOVT
5Z136 111_ .ruE S
45.78
7 �
,TIAL FREP�,I S
.00
.
r i n r
, O (ice VUUL?��.RS _J
71.61
5
TOTAL WE LENIDOP
76.65
�30- -
105 3
GOrIT ACT CLASS -FALL
307.00
TOTAL RREPAiDS
.00
TOTAL tFOtir US
F17
c;_..00
TOTAL WE V END�OR
307.00
CITY OF DIRiIM, BAR
RUN DATE. 11131000 17:01:49
VOUCHER REGISTER
ME: 9
WE THIRU. 11/0712000
PREPAID
FUNIUSECT- :CCT Pc3JEC -ACCT
PO #
sMMICE L:_SCRIPTIBN
Amami DATE CHECK
A NETsE EIMESTU4
TOTAL PREPAIDS�
' LE`�
TOTAL VOUCHERS
9'3.31)
TOTAL DUE VE;DL
91".00
FIRST CHOICE COFFEE 'SERVICE
10521
8-7J.8at0 SUPPLIES -COFFEE
001409 0-4212",
10521
5332403 ED RENTAL410V 00
17.95
TOTAL PRErA;DE
.00
TD T AL VOUCHERS
154;14
TOTAL DUE VENDPOP,
154.14
BILL L FLAINNE Y
1264411-423,40—
PER DIEM -IACD CON -F323.75
t
TD Ott P EPA IDS
.'O0
TOTAL VOUCHERS
323.75
TOTAL DUrr VEtD!GP
n -v T=
323. 1 f
FOOTHTLL T';MSIT _"PIE
1125 45 ..5--
1056:3
11457 FOOTHILL PASSES -DCT 00
5,32' 60
111.5.5. 455'•_:--
10560
11457 CITY SUDSIDI - DCT -00,1,.213-99
TOTAL PREPAIDES
.00
TOTAL VOLICIHERS
6,544.59
TOT AL DUE .,'ENL ---i
,, , 544, 55'
3 -.Sr 32 RECREA t I ata R a UNU
V.00
..
T01 ' ��'ryj� �}r
La i, r_ , REPAIM
E�34 �.
TOTAL VOUCHERS
39. 00
TONAL DUE —NDrI'+
.'vt�r•3
ra
F 1iv.L. Ci�r�l-l.:irTES _I NIC: A -i r
....
2505510-464i 1-81499-4641, 1
A60656.
10-09 IASCCFI Sk, .0 C y Ri CSLAL
1.3 7 6116
i_.__..v cv vs... ♦�.:. 1i
Y yrZ S. ;et C'"
ili ij4 ., :�! v.:Y L.trr hS
,
�{ -:r 0.
5
TOTAL PrwPATDv
..
.00
707- VOUCHERS'
TOTAL DIE VENDOR
i rt 104,67
1MCNASN
tt1.4-3 •7i;'--
1
,.
-347120; FECF:EATItTE fiEFL'P.iD
78.00
TuT,.L PREPP-1 DS
.005
TOTAL llJUCHERS
70.003
TOTAL DUE VENDDP
78aii�':
GWWS REP TC4Elr.f{T TO%l
00115'314 4221---
it -717i' 54.'Cv-HERITAGt P�.
280.00
?01,.-319 42210--
10526
1?it73 REPAID EiICS-PETERSON PK
530,00
TOTPL PREPATDG
.00
TOTAL VOUQ EIRS3�0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
860.00
CITY 01F'DWA41001' Bich
RUN DATE= 11/51/x'0 } 17'01:4'4
ViOUL-WER. REGISTER
PASS= 10
BU'E THBU; 11G7/2000
PREPAID
Fli JSECT-ACCT- RG" T CT
FD #
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
An-tNT i}ATE CHcCi.
GRAPHICS UNITED
0'0 4 f� 42 jfL_
1
s em!
1 _.4�_
T a � �-'_ C{? j� t�.^al
44 FSI j SVC Its, J 1000 ERCH
u [r i
, 16.5,2',
TOT; PF_ AIDE
.Ot}
TOTAL VOLICriERS
4, 5.01
TOTAL DDE VE MUM
4,65';.01
GARY GREENID
Oi- •. i 45 __
5 p
101 ._
1
'TRACT SS -S C a
CGs9fR„LT GLPo � E"htEF
Qf, ,
,f.t _
Tt pt F 'AT
U , A .:'iL� , :IDS
e�
. tN
Tern: }'n't''�ERS
,OTAL DLEEvD—'D
90.0.
'E*SICA FALL,
00 153.5 455,0 -
1U1' i
COh i'RACT';CLASS-BALL
576,00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
576.00
TOTAL DUE :EN.DOR
576, 00..
HANISGA 16 INDOOR CLIMBING Uyr. LLL
, o 45 --
.0512
COidTRACT:. CLASS -FALL
192.00
TDTE i �ii::"AIDS
, }0
9S S!r
TOTAL ILICHEFS
TOTAL DUE �E bB11 fR
P2.00
(!0
HDL r
, _,} CRE. STAT Pfj'E :';
30,x_`.00
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL }ate HERS
TOTAL DE
300,00
I-iT
ARTHUR
.1-92 7 REC EATIM REFUND
50.00
TOTAL FRRFAIDL0
.00
TOTAL "'OLICHERS
5 -cf. 0 ;'
TOTAL WE VENDOR
0 t
rcFlN'T TIS
L [[±r ff
2'L — I3` j� E.r{itr.Ev
21 .
kT1 _jP5-42'1 j 1 -
r ,1
bBti01 MEPR• -SS MICS -NEWSLETTER
303.W
TOTAL PREP IDS
.00
TOTAL V53�v'r�ER5
324,75
.,, �
TOTAL DILE 'tEPi}'Ott
��
3 24. 3
SUPPLIES-HALLOWE N
144.71
TQTAl PRE- FAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
144.71
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
144.71.
[1.1-'472-0--
Cid T f7., ,Cri �,i'�
FE,�,_Ft ION F�rJ,'D
-):� �.
,,,,.C),,
rf l •_``�:. =:�_
355G`=' P CREHjii i F#EFJhdD
4l}„}??
TOTAL P�t_FA.D9
. 11
r�}y , om,r c
Fiii FiL }V;,SCH �
l }
TOTAL_ WE NX ELI
115,�n
CITY OF DIAMOND uAF;
RUN DATE. 11/01/200" 17.01.49
VOOCHER REOISTER
PAGE: ii
DUE THRI U' 11/07/2000 `
PREPAID
ECT-QCT
PO
iMl ICE DIESCR1FTION
DATE C.4ZEC .
0015M5110-45300—
is Ali,:
CD :T'-.ACT: CLASS—FALL
v • t?ryL?
S
TRIAL . ,..EPAIDS
.00
TUTAL "rULyr!ER
936.0-01
TOTAL r N
,JEFF R6LL
. V4;
"
TIM PR PAii%=
s (�
TOTAL MUCKERR
10.00
TOTAL WE VENDOR
90.00
OINIM
HULS EN IRENTAL°MI AN }�;_;?-41T, 1.EC
0015510-44:4;--
101464
SEPT U% ': PROF a)CS-NIPDES;
1,c75,00
ii555?5 455CIO--
104M
SEPT 100 PROF 5UC`SMST,tJlOIL,RCYC
%,451.Z'5
TOTAL PREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL j.OLC?iERS
5,1 .25
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
11,156.25
NiVAL iPR:: IN
1115,_c f 45200._
1(v11i
WNTFAET CLASS-CALL
2r.. 00
TOTA PFEF;1iDS
.UD
TOTAL VOLC'E S
2.3.0!1
E OTAIL DU- ` t -DCR
aF,L AMrj _t,PIR.- E S
1I) __
927W ION 'EA C;;U:Il4T1 FAEIR
240.00ljn
:lE 45,:10—
tJj
u'?'FF' # `fy`ifC`"Il.? Tl .i.}73iiiCsC~-'RT,i^y.T7i.i'E'1
41250
O.R- P?.EPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VQU-Hr RS
6 .50
T AL
.652.5
Ui -:.LCC;L
FLI '- FPL 00-.33
10
Or '" --
I T:GAL AD - FPL 00-4
i ••
_via 2301 _--
LEGAL AD FF:� r}_:.,
ii1:9�f
C _•_-,iv?'
LE r�_ I7 - FM 00-19
LFII L f U - FPL 00 - �
i •1� .7v
Ow •, a ._ E t.
'
LEF11L AD - =PL ^� -36
iw40
T01TAL PREPAsLE
.00
O, f} , F
TOTAL L%LcNC;E-:
773.
INT'L ASS" OF CHIEFS ni I=• "'CE
126441 42'".;--
1ACP C C N F FLAN''NERY/I?UDD
4:0.00
Tmll FREPA1DBS
D
TC I AL VIDU .i EEF!S
4W. 00
TOzA.} DLIF aECI'MOR
440.1'3
INT.- . COUNCILOFFn HIF_FPaINSI CENTERS
;_._5--
A*� MIE�iDF:'SiP-�!I�h3TGOMERY
54.40'
0014095--t_ii=--
Ai+•_?_)
"'4 /yy3 AD - IC."-C"Pu1'1. C
;992.44
TOTAL PF'EPAID5
,4 .
-TOTAL VOUMERS
3,442.('14
TOTAL Didt VENDOR
3,042.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
RUN DATE:11.%011-20010 17:01:4?
VOUMR REGISTEP.PAGE:
1 '
DUE THRI: 11.107J2404
PFEPrIt
FLI!FO.,'SECT-Ar4CT-PRDv''ECT-A,C-LT
PC '#
I11V010E DEtSC91IPTION
A"1 JPdT. LATE GHFGk:
INTERNATIONAL PROTECTIVE SVCS IIN
00trL411-;•5416--
103=1.
V
olw6l,COR55INS GUARD S41CS -SEPT
P, s
, 75
TOTAL PREPIDS
AI
.00
TOLTAL 'VOUCHERSL
�'^ 75 '
J,�,_v1
TOTAL D'VEHTf i
i,Q'.: ,75
INVISIBLE TOUCH
00 14:910- 42325--
1}5:4
.-2 E[ITPTMdT-1LIDAY Pett
:.545a00
TOTAL PREPAIDS00`
TOTAL VOUCHERS
2_545,Of?
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2,545.00
TP. F1-rATf;Y
`10 ? � 42140--
1+ :'7&
DE C-00 LEASE SUITES .166.190 -DEC
-9,465.70
T3ITAL FREE PAl
TOT T L VOL l IEP5 .
19,465.70
fteTnL DUE VENDOR1G_465.7
CkMC
.. -2-10f.-27-
_
_. {: z LF A:TL� F-cFs1 D
.. -
_10.00�•
TOTAl F ;E �;II
sJt+ •
TO AL VI 'CHER
;
5 .001 ,
f DTA;' DUE M: AORMIN
5G, �tCf
1
___�_ •:--
00,140190-4
E•?i57 SVCS ASORm 'T XEF.C' :
:..
75.15 .
T:beAL PREPrniIDS
!.!.,
G I AL , OlulCHIER9
75.18 -
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
75r1S
KEEN 11,11ARIM R=
v '5_v!4 1 t i--
-:` i g s SLS c`r€Ar ?SAI°
X4,1?'
TOTE' PREPA ?"
,W
T,OTf L VOUCHERS
24:
TO L'DL� VENO
24,12
a .1. 4 4iA.?'
PLSgi4 vv�'i'3-9.rj, /ly �--
195.0
r+•}i
10TAL F.' PATIDE "
,{3G
TOTAL '.VOL'-CHE 5
loSvD
OTP, DUE VENDOR
195. (10 `
H Orl. `. ! S t 9
=: u411 ri ,fy--
PER DIEM-BEIM' JMINIt�
y ,,;5
f
,DOTAL PR
,fief -
TOTAL VOUCH S
323,75
TOTAL i1Pi4lLEVP
323.75
cj%
L_9 Out O� ,C.. L. tES, Lr COUNTY' DIV
,
:3 24.:42' 42^_25
L-342 LEAGUE AWL MTG-DJt GESS
25.00
V :_=--
D- 4� LEAGAFL AtVL MTG-AREVALO
2.5. 00
TOOT, WL PP-.EPATDS
.00
TOTAL VG
SU,fv
TOTf,L DLA VENDOR
5t}.�JG
CITY OF DIAMOWD BAR
Ul DATE.' 11101,12000 17.01.49
YUW+CtEP REGISTER
PAGE,Li+ -
DUE THRU. 11/07/220013 ,
PREPAID
;s CCT +'— [GJECT_"CCT
v
fG
INVOICE tLCVGTPTifVELrt
AMIDILNT DME LEi4c1..L•.i'.+
LIGRTDIN t� ASSOCIATES" IM: '
o'i'''M—
LET991i PROFS?C5 - EN' 00-274
i
OTAL KEPT IDS '
,n
fav
TOTAL 4'IIt F CNERS
5,30.00
TOTAL DUE VEINDORavL..00
- LE I aei.a3-W, SNUTE{i'e l iv
vr + tSyE p { :r
0014wa 4�1.=--
0014090-4211413-
t
1 2•:'-
.4 f1 S AE a'� 1,� 1` F)i+ j^,a 1';
4; c U, . Eh.� ;# ING 9VC'S-t�ADG:.
C
1 ,4G�
TOTAL PRE Tl�
PA
- ..'
s i. 13ii. • ss r HE S
11.410 .
.:
TGTAIL DUE VENKIR.
IR: NE LEYVA
001-34'211--'
arS RECREflTIC"; RE NO:
3U.00
Di
3P ^S REDEASIO?K 'REFUTE,
Lit
TGTP F"r.EPAI�JS
T
101 AL APIOULi�ERS
78M 8 x t14
10 EM
'L JtLj cap
78.00
f'LR1Ti1?: F_F
iC��
0,.15_ 45.,0.0, -
:"1
CaNTRTCT CLASS -FALL
h .40
TGi-Al..� .PREPAITlitS :
.�pp�;
i O t r,L t vuCHE-RS
62.—t'U-:
. TJ I AL DUE�E;=.}, IPM,
6.:.x40
v DI 'AN' J t.. T. E Tf:
10121
CONTRACT CILASS-FALL
421.20
TC'TAll- P .EPH"Tu:t
.CSE
TOTTh .OU!'-EE
421.20
TOTAL DUE 'VEMI OR-
E:iaG?
A`•;CL Li COUINTY $
__ _-
10561
tTt
1s0005i'3 OCT rl
`kprx8�.
1 1 "�'S12, ' T PASSES - or.. 00
323.20
TOT L PF_PATEIS
�?(�
TOTAL VDIUCP_RES
584M
TOTAL DUE :VENDDRI
584.00 ,
€ <
LCC 11GELE5 CEDU I`T • T, I ST . ATTORNEY
PP1='-'L SALARY ATTCHMIT-BDOW"1469
345.00
TOTAL PREPAIIIS
,��r�
TBTPL VO!7C!'ERS
345.00, .
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
00
LCA ..":1GE' C rftEtlTf 'PLBLIC nuR1;"a
01015554-45507—
LFL
AF1�Fi_':j SIt`_,,, t'JL REPA.R L?B £sL�'u
5,1178
TGTAI FRE- AOS
, u
-
T [ITA,L lEOUCHERSrj
1T_x. 15 .
1MlAL DUE VENDOR
5 s73.15,
CITY lF LIMIND- BA
RUN DWI:111 112001 17101:49
VOUCHER. REGISTER
ME: 14
DUE THRU= 11/07/2000
PREF`AIL
FUh ,'SECT—ACCT—PRC T= T
PL
1MJ01CE DESCRIPTION
TE
A�!CUNT LAE CHECK
LOS ANECELES EU<,_�dT �` SHEFIF`E LEFT
00144.1-45402—_
� y <
_1411 T ff FL Ci ,FcII1v 7SE S 4
172
4, .94
f.1 E1 4L 2--
31411 SCHL TlRFFC CUNTP-,L—SEPT
_
'�, 2.'1.x2
0014411-45402-- _2--
31411 CALVARY TFFFr_ CONTRL—SEPT
5,41?.0 -
I014411-4r4-`,�I--
31256 CONTRACT SVIS—SEPTQ0
_,.:._ 427.4
11255553-45402--
31411 TRNST SALES SECUF'Itr—SEPT
L
102.54
TOTAL FREPfi IDS _
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERES
337 34_=.42
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
337,343,42
BEE 10,41
C: 334f"7 J0--
t01
-
39206 RECREATION KC[' �
29.0-0,�t.
TOTAL PIR EPI AILiS
t
S
TOTAL k,'L�XHERS
28.00
TOTAL DUB VENDOR
2 8. 0 0
k
MAINTEX
001534-200-- 191
a Ts
1Cil Ti_
`i.Js_s�}15 MAIN SUPPLIES-i-ERIT�154
i r.
43.8-
PRL
.00
TOTAL VE10MCH01M
o5
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
4_.55
V12MA C MAa sU:
0015350 —45300-- 300--
10 5
CONTRACT CLASS ALL
326.0
�01 52 0 a ^' —
10129
CONTRACT CLASS—FALL
204.00
00153tO 45.00--
10410
CONTRACT CLA53—FAI-
1,0��), fir
:TOTAL PFEPA1DS
TO FAL VOUCHERS
1,530.00
TOTAL DUE �IENILJQIR'
i 5330.
MCE CORPOR". t
00155 4-45522--
1r,125
305=i RSHT OF WA" MAIiIT—SEPT {}q
0015554-45522--
—
1�t_�'
9-Ivi; F`;I=WAI MAhiT _ SEPT, 000-01555-6-45506--
M254
9050 VEGETATION CGNi F`uL—St;' :
2, 951.9
TOTAL PREPAIDES
.00r
TOTAL ELL 6 rFh} OR 22 3
r - vy; i
w
r 1 u ;--
. -•
1 316
5 i`-,7374-6 1 WATER SERVICES—SEPT 00
5 50 ,
0014090-421310--
IC�v1t�
4':
57973744,11 ED REN E SUITE r,0
,_� ,E�,:' 1.t1,� 1. _
L+Jz+a4..
G
TOTAL FREPAIUS
TOTAL F O Cu_rRS
34.00
TO AL CUE 'VENDOR
34.00 ,
,.. ME T %21i.'1.5..
1125.5553-45535-- —
f! 9
! 5
LL.i ) kSwT�f�('( I 'PASSES—CCT 00
20,F73'.20 -
1125553-45533--
5Ct`'
UuT } CIT{ S� .SITE n�
Y OCTC.
7 &84. so
_
TOTAL PRrPAIDS
.09
TOTAL '` U 1 _fiS
28,424.00
TOTAL DUE VEh11tiF:
23,424a00 ;
CITY OF DIAMOND DAF+
Fld% DATE: 11/01/20M, 17:01,49
kU CHER REGISTER
1=
GE
WE THRU. 11,507/2(300-
-
P F'PI:D
Fut1D� SECT-AC�:T- ' OL�ECT-=;CyT `
PO ,#
1INVOIGE . DESCRIPTION
A}aOL'CIT DTE Ch'EC!i
MMASC
0014030-42315—
Ca {E S- Yi
�A a G{.
TOTAL fist £?R3.` -x -i.
at•Y
IOTAL VO iCCHERS
50.0?
11TAL DUE E"I'DLei.
MOBILE MDDiULAR MANAMMENT f rIMP
Nj5
26FS-eVC CYN n�00"Y650-42140—
=_6LsL 7C-LELG
4.J.06
TOTAL F'RE]PAIDS
100
TOTAL VOUCHERS
460.06
1fl1All" DOE ,}i■1I :
460.06
E L�_R' M.'Ffi
1� 7`r1
22576, € F T 'REFUND
iv t1
TOTAL PREPAID,
TOTAL 41OUNIC ERSCL
, 7 v 8 ,
.
TOTAL DLTE VENDOR
,++
USE
,
10500
o2945SR SUPPLIES-DSY INS ` EROa
1;,11 .?5
TOTAL PrEPAIDS
00
TOTAL VDUCHERE
1,11°.7v
TOTAL DUE }tE11110
.x.- L Y si..x}.._
STEVEN1 0. raLLE.axi
'D 0 1 5210 4 4 10 ;_l_-
r+��
TOTAL P?EitPy�",,IDS�
.;MITA-
.?G
VOiiLi3L-p.:J
130. 0
TOTAL DLE ; ;1E5
I =x-00
x
0014090-421130—
-0-4.3`0 ??v[ 5!mc_F! LIG REPEATER
217. 14
TOTAL F UAIDS
To l k VOI LICFER
217.14
Tr' AL DLit" VENDOR
: 217.14_ .:
0-1-RANIGE COAST FENCING ACAMEMY
CONT vx
CONT Alf GLAJ�-r^ALL
'{ L
OTA EP 7 t-
TOTAL [ 7'arE 117
.00
TGT-_ 4LU-CFEEiaS
196.00
T'OT'AL DILE 1.'E�DtOR ,
19e.V1
.,..4.4. 's,....s1
1• t REPA T +`_ S i
,. IF-' iii' TAM C CLRV
142.°`
fy
TOTAL PPEP IDS
TOTAL VOUCHERS
102.89
TOTAL DILE VENDOR
oi.Er4
��ss i [[ �{{++n (j
i .ir 4-vMS PRI.}=FrF'aEF1HG, F,.,LCUM v.
0014070-44000—
A. 7oci..
tc-p tc PROF. . {+^-_TRy3,�' r, ?, D
s 4
`' 16
T TAL GEF' IBS
.0t3
TOTAL ,�
Y�JCC HER'S
r,TOTAL� 7554.1_'
- 1i tx
TOTAL i t sE},D;534.1ix
CITY OF DIA' JND BAR
RUN DATE! 11,101f2000 17 tf1=49 :,
MOUCHER REGISTER
;`AGE: 16
DUE THRU= 11/0.7/21 }
PRE -PAID
_
FUND#SECT-AC TT -PF UJE T-fLCCT
P3 n
IIAr}IC {iF,R:FTIOP!
4MOUNT DATE
CHECK
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PP 22A /B PAYROLL TRANSFER-PP22A/B
397000.00 11107/2000
P?22A/3
P ai PAtRO LL,.' Rc N1FER-,LC 22 a
95,000.00 11107,2000
PPz
TOTAL PR€GAIL{B
134,000.00 '
TOTAL GLLIC i IEPRS
a 00
TOT AL DUE VEPdLtOF
134,00#O.Uv
CATHY PECi=ICH
001-3473.#--
`00 " RECREATION REFUND
(�5(r
tL,
T[,AL `'!,._PAIL{;
.00
..TOTAL VO1i'E+j.+';E,
A
34. Oft
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
-24.00
PEGB RST I RE14E11T �' I'
:0
{##'-=1ra--
PP22 PER5-RETRO PAY
20, .19 11;0712000
4579
001-21109--
PP 21 sr SUR
- ' °EM'51ENEFFIT
43,71 11/07/2000
46567
tj#= :<0 --
to
PP 2i1a?LiTtiRY FIJI BA�r.
509.69 111U7120} �
46557
001 2,1,109
PP22 RETIRE COVTRIB-ER
3 441 S2 11107/2000
46579
{�•r1 �11At9--
PP 21 RETIRE CCS€{RIB EE
5,448.66 11/0712000
46567
,z,, 1.o?--
P°222 4ILITAPY BUY BACK
509»59 X110712000
46579
001-21109--
Pv 2 SU VIVIIR BENEFIT
413.71 1110710#00
46579
PP 21 RETIRE-CGNdTRIB-ER
1,287.0A 11107r2000,45567
*01 1#?"--
PPZ) RETIRE CONTRIB-EE
5,427.54 1,1/071/2000
4,579
T"TAL PREPAIDS,
17,020.05
#20.05
TI
T[ t A" VOUCHERS
.00
TOTAL DUE `.'ElN
17,020.05
4.550. —
�C'?4
11007 A5B[iE.IST SVCS-BILEABLRD
175.00
DTAL f•REPAITE
.fljfj'
l•_
{DTAL VOUCHERS
175.00
TTM DUE ::tcNIlOR
175.00
PIA tNEY B1MES INC
_
Fj014090-4213,'Y--
�� �.
% 1 -F
1 7 1�9
4 � fj 1'
361 1t•,-OT00 LB�, MAILING 5Y5TM-[{vT € 0
� 369.90
..
TiITAL PREPAID S
vBrr
TOTAL „ LUC tER-u
v6�s93
TL!TAL DUE VE'N'DOR
66.90
POET NET
4095 RL.-
-
�. _ _ SlGi• I1r,JL F`RI:.t.
5.52
{v�AE:iiPAIa
.00
TOTAL AL YJU#CHE
7.52
TOTAL DUE VE^dL tR
7.52
f ivi.•
47" :' PRINT BVvS-CIP PR7J
199.4'
t
0 (R 5510-42118--
47310 'PRINT 51uS-SEISMIC STUDY
,�Ft �•_�j10}__
4/.12: PRINT S:LS-- FPL 00-3142.87
Cr /� r1
: {J�lvili5 4ii1U
TJ 1. y,
PRIN MCS-ZCNSING MA q
�}
i=Ja=7i
TOT AL PREPAID
.0f.
TOTAL 'VOUCHERS
329.61
GT'L
TDUE VEfi1u�R
329.61
CITY OF DIAMOND BP
RUM DATE. 11/01112000 17.01=49VOLCHER
AEGISTER
PAGE' i?
DUE TRRuj: 11107J2000
PPEPAID
F•UW1j SE[T-ACCT-FFO;J,'ECT-ACCT
FO #
1NIVO10E DESCRIPTION
RMIMI DATE CHECt•'.
RAMIDSHAC'F,
te
0015350-41300—
26u 1 : �,;�[P, IES CONCRff IN PAP
-6 " 42
0t14l95 _ 0--
254019 SUPP, -L'(�j-TOT+COfqc„F;R
21.64
TOTAL FREPAIDS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHER w
49 ,55
TOTAL DUE ENIDOR..
495.55 -
�t
t,AB! vi,Ji':
,.
C�, BTOD11 ITCONANSARI
f;
'84 "07'200. 46566e.
TOTAL FrLFAIL y.
C
154 a Ou
TOTAL F”0, U, ,ER
TOTAL TSE VENDOOR
154 grj
RAL`HS MCERY C0MPAt'3y
0014090-42-225—
i0�o_
101460:: MTC _vU.°�F51S_ G;r.
23.3?
0044090-42 --
SUP.-PIPACE M, & 101126
00155 3 _;_ 1«:.;
11 3
0x4_ c ` 61RE`LS-C°iEri uATTERIES-
1.18
14.06
15014090 4z_25--1,
t:
101116C,1092 MTO ,LGL5-CI-IMM;
25.45
10555
10 146009iIES—Lt3t;TL3'.�hl�
r
iv4Rr
iFai
TOTAL c ,PFT Ov
o 00
TO j AL VOUCH_ ;S
93.73
T 13 AL DUE WtIMOR
,..-.. .:l:i EE i':. _l; t": 11.. s6ir.
v.
RACT CLAS_ -FT LL
�.1a
TM 17-MUDE)
00
TOTAL VaUCHEIPL,
91"a3t�
-
TOT y jj ))'��
TOT AIL �.}tlE iF4 ii; V�,'
i.v tii{�
[ 7 1j
::rf i;:Li�'aEEP PR y113j3LR .v 1INC
(! 4 f 7 f�--
�.. i
l t'+;
1€ 400
108
_moi 6 ' C5!^C L CARD'S
i�:-5 , r:It1i ��.. uU— vi�rsl
4�Jw95
TOTAL , : EPA MS
.00
r
TOTAL VOUCHERS
40.95
TTAL DUE VENDOR
40 .a4
nrE ,.
M L.! t y
-
419K-5 TEMP SVC--P.1W S W c1L
309
010 14 1 40 14000--
10L96
,29
41655,11TEMP- S ES fi Cl -RI, fic G ?4
.2.3
, 568. 40. �,..
TOTAL PREPATIxS
,60
TOTAL VOTUCHERS
kOTAL DQE VENDOR08:Ja
7?P 63
' aJu}
HRU21Liuv
0015210-44100
- PLN}'4 MIyi
195.00
TOTAL PREPM #
TOTAL 'VOUCHERS
195.0'
TOM D Uit VENT
DO
1:5.00
1.01,1 aJ 4TL NC
tU PLIEI LF`, CAMP
55.41
fglir-v J1, `t ,110!_--
;975.:
cul. FLIEc - DAY CAMP
1,444w42,.
TvTFL PREPAIDS
a00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
1, � -2.83
T T t rf,^- t�rkiTlr,:
0, L i�VE __M -1„
5,f • a-.:,
1,53 .83
C17{ OF DIAMOND BAR
RLQ?: IIPTE= 11,101/2000'17101.49
V€it CHEF: REGIS EP
PAGE! 1S
DUE Ti-ERU 11?�i7/2,p00
PRE—Pp .
FUNEI 1SECT -ACCT FROJ CT -ACCT
PC # INIVOICE DIESCRIF TiL-44
AMOUNT DATE CHECK,
S.C.A.C.E.O.'
A.0
.:�._.CA"CE
c nr-c-y '!',-° :r L� :-,'
- COM, UI b 1 i
M1�F.. F 4 i/07/2000r..G,
_0.0 1. 46., 1
TOTAL PREP IT
60.00
_
TOTA-
L VDUL-ERS
atl
TOTAL DU.E VZOOR
c ."_a1)
i�.�t J Sf-RIL
EP, ii. ._ l•:iFJi r FF! P!l!.'
C1015210-42310—
,. SEPT 00 '-LtEL — DOME14. DU.
247.53
'
F! . n
�G.?iL t P i c
.01i
TOTAL CH 5
415.8
TG,AI DUE
SAN 7EL VIA P rTrIPIMP
LEG, L ri FFL 00-33
179.40=
CUM7 1:+
LEGAL Ail . FPL f'YF_ ;?
i 7�t .1ft
0--
LEGAL An _ FPL 00-19
2077 a �
LEGAL AD._ FP
c
00 1 23U 10
LEGAL AD.- FPL CIO -31
a_iaa,
v i
LEGAL Ail, _ FvL,c
1°
__. _
LEGAL
LEGAL,-
23 .I.
F 1 _vF.Sfi--
LEAF fiLF�.. �'P 00-�39
E7.-
TCTAI GF?= AIDS
.f.}:01
k l ii 1 .iv:CiCF:i]
J
l 1 Z06.96
Dum "ENT -0
E £t IF SA%vcge, .
.38.9715 RECREATION REFUNID
78M
T7. AL PRZ ATMS
00
v E nL .iLESr :.;
118.7
TOTAL DUE :ENI ;
? ?
r
u_ .AF
T
:A563' 'fiF-ENIS' 6101— F: —i .1
F r
:..
ii 00
cz 5r
_
14675, e : Ci B ..OSSE.
i G C 1
O14.ee ,- P.
TOTAL VU.N. h I
i J . Fv
TOTAL WE tfLkr'yil]R'
!�� GECCREATIGfis .LF'�3!�
1�-. f)
TOTAL PIREPAI
T'�AL lF u+ rnn
1
#3,00
p T
TciA DUE Y.?.:�L:5
13. 00
CITY OF LIA," NEI Sqq
PUN LATE= 12/0-I/2000 17,0I;49
n
VOUCHER REGI TEr
-
'int L:l iv a
_f�
t't'G_� i •�
-
UE T? fit ; 11[07/20W
PREPAID
FUT%ll;/SECT -" F,;O;EC -!CCT
'r's� u
T.Pd ;ICS L rR TT7r
_ t�U, IF'Ti :,
3T lLiT
1' DATE `
%}SCF:
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE air-otp.pOP TED
. =
TETE L SON! "�AIF:T �E�`� ytt3
f �.#S
'.
t.Iv.-•
{
t:RC'nLiL i!I(E"AUG 00s
C 5
1115__
5555
1`1`'
1
E1�NT {i
ili,
-t
e^i
44.00
00115454cZ ;7--
iil
_
5
J RCL YNLI MAIflT RG Vo
li
0,0
iicc445.7--
j
TEFF4
=v `vy: { {i S6it ��iIsAU Lt
3i3
yS
i,=i-�i;
ti
?i•
zv:TRFc `6NL MAL-ACi
35Ga
-
Cy4j,,
f}dFj,
tv ja
3 06
__ '- ,7--
tt T 'I ff+r
�1�1 .,j
.%_�, �` 7L?FCt' u'¢ iAe 's'• [•� -
1 I,�? �•I- 1 dist
-, in, 3
F i L— A C
Jf.t 5 +T7_ 1?--
n �,
Ic.._._
tF �° rt n t=-
3_t . 3t: T{,. SON I€ P3 ;
_ tT 3 aUG; 0
i2= a .
. -'
TOALP-t ILS
3
TOTAL VOUCHES.
c I�rafi
T OT I{I,: IErIr�OR
31 ,
SKYNAWKS SPURTS fCA-u� Iic.
'153=_,1, 4.= * -
1M37
CONTRACT GLASS-tFALL
364S
0053'-5�7"---
' -
CONTRACT ClS-Q''A
18. W
OTAL RKP ILS
001
TFj Ira I R' It i i C
-
ss_. J1
-
TOTAL LLE VENDOR -
�7 , ti
: a..Et
LLL .tY
DUNEorii
'
1RSG, Ai TON REFUND
70.00
TOTAL FRE IL
0
TOTAL VOLEHIEFiv
70M;
TO I AL nucVENDOR
?u, i)(
T;^t {
JJ = ::i��., ;j:,yTi ES+�.i£L�>—.aii. i��i�'si fn'S
C 3 T T,4, C EJ]_ .atv�e
itL_i.l1 E: i?__—�
f 1 7I'J Sf..
�i{: �. rijs t+-1..31}
`Lu��•C=3'J
ei +
PDCPATDS
a sI
r
.00
TVIOUICHERIS
OTAF > lu;: l3FA Lt
{ .+iCl
{ := r
isRL i:�sl: Fi[A El D_ssDIN
.
tt tr, fin{ __
ti'
a rr C 'f'� TR [
ELL 1 n� IRI
462.57.
.r- '
E{._€ Tti"'i, LIT,a
L
a r 7 6L
26
ELECT Slice T = G CPaTR:,
�._
's, J fZr
O � 5TH :=-
ELEGt �{t T tEF s fir-•,`
�Cu .. ISL
-
r '
08. 70
f� 7 ; ' ..---
F-
ELE"T 61;C- - DIST '�"
1 s.
- �,1 3.
00 �3. L--
i�.i
Cf. Clt..-.
I- C 3 SVC TFiFs L C1� l RL
141.0
{
Jt-vL_.�r1 411.26--
ELECT v.'Cu TRFFG CWTRL
?7f
TOTAL PRE;'AILIE;
^l
TGTn Vl'j,Jr c
DUC
TOTAL LIQ 4 E*3a3Oi;i
r.
:�.OJa
{ T>•�.FA!I-A f.:.,ie L MI'llANY
— —
G S�6 HIO COMM CTR
68.au5
TOTAL 'EEPA_S
l�3
TOTAL VOlUDH RS
{ LTA_ L{E 11EiDL
68 .555
68 .55,
CITY GAF DIAMO D: BA
Rid i! TE; 11t'G1/'ijr,17-0-149
L
VOL0EF FIGISTE
F'AsEa t'
DUE THRU. 11/07/2000
EE tt f1 1+
FLih9I AMT—A1"�,,.T—°,ROJECT—ACCT
p12. #
i� 1�t rtn 11
:�xiFili CE._ Lt'rPI PT I aN
u
^pPREPAID
LI�1'l:
DAT_ CHEC
51 L�TI ILA1i, IIANASEMEN i
1i.F30
LSE 00 EAS CPdTR ?�E"
1,225.00 .
12,,4411 i1l)__
1 ,1
�J,:�:
DEC +.r(. �rDMI�Dt; AREA MAI`T—DE�. C.
�i75ac30
I'I ¢RE._PAI''i?;S
TOTAL f4HE9 RS
=tf13
i w.1
TCT,L DUE FE?� ;'LIR
s 3...�1 ..,_
iLLORES 6PRAD L 1 NG
1.-'.+ t } _
1f
51,20 S`sERUHD PIS. DEP SUMMi RiDK
�L, a:LJi'S
TGtT_ REJA Y iD�;
400
r �iTnTL r L•, ai :S
A
Es- ' £v
50 0
GTL 2222E VENDOR
StF, �X
)RK, ST 'AM " ---i
0015 3"ny v_;__
F` Fr Eu iG
., _
r
,.0.D
TGTs^L F::E A1DS
;}
TD T AL VOUCHERS'
TGTA DUE VErD7R
oi,,ptt
J.
°T: Sic11 RITt ='-Th tiEi:(ATlit€3
r
tr+15 , + F`,ti., 0 0 --
.t „
;. 5—. UZlITl 61,1 S-Mk.4EE rAF:.
5h01�?i1
DS TOTAL rL rfirrF. n ' ! *i�v
TOTA- VOI Ir -E
CP. PIS
V
HUI f i>_ DUE irNEYLIK,
5t3, tx j
(TL TF nq-r
85 55 - PEF.El;I i{:i� REFUND
78.00
T1:TA_ Cti—yrC ; 3.
�-t
ii. 3 ,i r�<_ ti r'3.�LfiLkli
1L. cc'.
Ta TAIL: u�= kiPktDON
7:.00
,
tWAY
i 11 fat
31
1r,�1c
tt
',UCC7�c MM 6r�
_
�'7
,t'
lt!
T7 i3=rL LPNT'd
.,�jf��1TG
j
�--1i 42332
1{ry1 •'
YsG ,SUPPILS INDIUSTI211 1OPA�i't!
'- cmq- 4 &.
A1J1iF
MTr. PUPF�L T'(R,FLTL%?i310 isJ-
::.99
ff �t 33
- .23-251--
hE!#j
{TjJ� jlij _10
7t98 .
TOTAL PR p 'illsTi3T,
r )t
Al t
TGTr_ DUE,
.a
'W•.,
"7 t r'Ali TT'4 j -h12-
.. .
{ •; _ U i�it3�.,
'.=Tt"iTP3 '.;-:!'+t•;tinrrsn -
6. 164v
..�
CITY OF LIAMOM,, BAR
_
RUN DATE. 11.`01; 000 17.01:4°
V}5t'CHER RE ISTE�
Rt
PASE.- _
DUE T..HRE f.. 11, 107/2000
O6�}Otec
F t v_C r-AllT-PROJE1_T "'
e u
D ,
T I -- r S c a
# D.�L ry C,I iI
PREF- 1
� ;�.
ASC T DA E
.. CHE
sL. ! I ANYONE;:
:•ice
00
10526
COQ TRAC CLASS -FALL
T1.A:_ . t:_t A..S
at...,s.-
TOTAL VOUMIERS3z
, F9.. Iii
1 DT. -^,L DCS,`_ i EN-ItIR3,739.10
Tic OcF I ,r
SUPPLIES E/MEIR
53.04
�•.
r
7T t5
TOTAL PRERAILty
.Vit
TOTAL VOUCHERS ..
52 .04
TOTAL DUE F--Nr'OR
S Cao
THE ROT I IP T,
00155-J10-44300--
u 82
• j.;i
r._
.i4;-j�li Pi�'t1� `-��i'5-TR.�-�Ii = '37 PLM
.�, .., . � �u MSi ::: LP:
2,54M6
TOTAIL PR:EPAIDS
„O
T OT A L VOUCH!EPS
2,540.4.5 4,
TOTAL L'LE VENDOR
, Li._� -
7
27540.46
THOMAS v TL:BY
10M
CONTRACT CLASS-FALIL:
or
TOTAL PREPAID
.Uti
TOTAL k! Ur F
MOM
LUTATF'!"
Il1l.{i i{,3�. �`E�dLL
sFFv3f aVl
001 3 t 44100--
�+ F. [,
P�: & R COMPS -7128
p �.0
45.00 .
TDTA FREPAHIS00
TOTAL V0U :,>.,Fa.ilij
TOTAL DL ! �, ` ivR
45.00
.RAr
. Ci_ L'lb RO" v>.n:+j Cr_7
�i
1?i•. v
gcr`s It_: PRO .vteu_Si NS BIKE E LANE
171, 98 11 07 40510
011r�15 til . 410_ }--
� 82 SU PLIEL _ RDAZ}-
1�' _:?T
�, 7
ilii?; /nGQt 47G�
TOTAL fRPPAIDS
1,�54a?1
TOTAL VOUCHERS
TD}z DtiL #'E}ufi
— 17 554,1
hd
.�"sE!.,'.}:MICRO jNiCORNfic;A1TCO
1 .O 4' 2. --
FFOOLMM 9WTI VIRUS MT -1101-11011
339-5. 1
TOTAL PREPAIDS
,p{
TOTAL MIM
355. 61
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
375.bi
C'Mi hl TIF..
01)1.5210-
-. f LM, 80NMI: 9126
�� .30. 00 1
TOTAL PFEEPAIDu
r
T: STA" VOTLIMERS
T ITAL DUE Vi24BO
--;1 0. 0
SHE"i URBAN A
rLr...._.. N •
-230022__
tt t •t•
51212 REFUME, P?; i' F—HE3:ITABE
50 1,10
TO AL, f EPA:DS
.tau
TOTAL VOUCHERS
...
50.00
TTJTAL DUE. VENDOR -'
50. Of ;
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
t
,RLYv DATED 11/0112000 17.0i;49
VOUCHER
tr�G�.eH"tff PiLE i,ISTLF:
A
znr,E
{3i.JE ', hUi # J '43tF+
REPAID,
�OATE
PL t LST CE F vU�4? IL i
c Y INVOICE ESLD r'TIOr
AMOUNT CHECK
US H.EALT-iORKS MEEICL GROUP
0014090-42345—
1t Pn :.85351O9:i "-o- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
HY}iiLv
80.00,
TOTAL PREPAMS
TOTAL VOUCHE. v
&0.00 ,
TRIAL OLE VENDOR
r
: POSTMASTER
0014095-42120—
Q1. E5 `• 4` _
.. .:... r;ztdL4#AL S;.�a REPLY �JrEPMT
TOTAL 7. RL fii}J
TOTAL VOUCHERS
TOTAL DUE VES DGR
LOR'RAINIE VELLROL
001-23'002—
"j go RfFLlND PK DEP-PANTERA
200.00
]OT AL PPE.PAILS
.00
TOTAL VOUCHERS
200.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
r. ,'�
2100.00
r
ERIZON ALIFORNIA
Ity 1~ 4PSJ--
3r1L 14�j p'' PlioS}{`v+.J —. FJ lillilE4.
9093964-03-5
11 4.62
f
i.i,:ait��n
�[:i�"�tt!53 �, PH.
6- ,H. SVCS - CIT! ON LINE
157,34
ppi%i1::L--
rr314O'yt3 'Y 1i5--
25
:iQ8t 5 IiTVM — BLDG q -FTC
86.42 2
0014010-42125--
9C} 61_07 PH.S%0-N3DEM C./CN"
22.91
1185098-42'125--
o l�G t°G 'j PH.SVCS-IELEWORkS/ACS
:va
111.74
PH. SV - 5lc CYN Pj;
90.36
=h PH- 5 M -h `T'u GO! ".CTS
6
:31.54
001405 -42125--
�'H t�1La-yL3t��i�th�hfP
29.16
00-152-31-4211.:.�__
('
9I�t3.i%j� 9951 Pi i SI' C�—S 1 C CYN N PK
59
59.78
.0014090-42125—
rfJu 1I,rrH INSTALL CJl6-DEC�
116.6. .
0014090 -42125--
73123 t T
2,247.73
0015316-42125—
F098_ : 3 922 . SV CS A rE HILL LL
00193 .*. -42125--
PH
`JJ9-Fiif �s.}:C `�EA�R�'LK
�Gr.
.
'TOT; P�,= -:.I�S ,
r -_
.E.#�
OT, VOLC ERS
3,141.48
Y
TOT AL -1114E='E VENDOR
1147=45
WARREN SSI4L,1
..
C t fi
103.4 460P'?.E,
_ 5STarSOL
;L
2595.00^rfi
2++0_—
4�1M{;PFS- "fi FPL 0537
14f:!1+)
001-23010— 01;,r--
1 1 rte
TOTAL
.00
'.
fREPAIDS
1'1 i t—i. ii v�.iCiFli.�j•3�
r.
52.00
TOTAL DUE 4?EH
518.00
V._L R.SCC iNG IIC
_P
116509E-44000—
HUSTINO FISRAITY ' ON LIE
5100 W07;20(70 46575
IOTA F EII) J
:,50,; 0
TOTAL VOUCHERS
.00
TOTAL DUE VEENJOF,
350.00 ,
CITY OF u'IA GI L PAP
�'5j�;
RUN DATE= 11/01,'.:0,00 17:01=49
K " t�4ER REGISTER
PACE_ 22
DUE € HR'U} i 11 /07 -uu:
FU";T/aEvT rLt) P t iLT L
PO #
!
i iOTCr DES F'
3 .IPE�GI
PREPAID
NATE CHECK
CIESTI PUBLISHING C4:
- 0014090 -423:20—
1 rC�'
Sf,1f. }t�Y � ANNOTATED CA CODES
TOTAL PREPAIDS
TOTAL ;NChERSa
,8 .,
WESTERN GAMIN
Pit+�?SE 412i,='--
t1'r?7
00 SUPFFLIES-SIR BINGO ACTWE
27.555
TOTAL PPEEPAIDS
TOTAL VOUCHERS
27.55
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
27.55
PALL; IIRIGtHT
0014rrtt 44000--
-
1 i1
i �
='/i1; _i A/V SV1`-Pf[L•r_-ir,
7Dj•
rt c
117.5,
TOTAL PREF'AIDS
,nr}
:
TOTAL VOUCHERS
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
7117.50
1189 REFUND DEP-hERTTASEr
n
TOTAL PREPAID_
_L
.00
-ITA I
OU
?? iTt r, VENDO
r
20 ,00
jL .T
V I Rv L t
.9 L. +... a.i i
33610 FLORAL 13 HA,D,,
64.975 .
TOTAL PREPATD5
e00
T t A }Y�UfCHERR,
64.95..
TGT'AI yi:c MUM
64.95
TTON
.1
7766290 iitii tiT - CGPf LF SUM
iL 1rr'
: v
f� :.
4 8 4'
0 89
76---1Q00 r4- 2TNIT-C—OPIER SUITE 100
-
1 CO !#f+4 ; EUILV-SEP l �+
Leu:. .ev Ui
- ..
1 y —M9
7 6 1L: i! 4L) 1 �,lCo JUI Y—.SEP r1,t-.,
673. 59.
TOTAL FREPAIDS -
-
'
TOTAL VOUCHEr°E<
.0}U
<'} c42 5,
-
_
10: Ell
RL jE VENDOR:
+;-,- 2.56
p
i=v
C_r
F, !CREATION REFUND
TOTAL PREPAID
pp
TOTAL VOUCHERS
45.0}, 4
TOTAL DUE VIE, OR
45.60
..,.
^# nr.
_
S 4411 -_ 4 } _
f_ . atJ `
REIMS - MTC 1,,,15/00
F_+,:1
TnT8r Pt`'Zi P. ri TDS
_
Gf)
BT VOUCHERS
'-
T€FT1 DUE aJrtEi-t+E.
i is F t+,_ u�L S _3.r +3
L
36,� .
59
36.59
l
CITY OF -DIAMOND' BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: James DeStefano, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 07, 2000
REPORT DATE: October 31, 2000
FROM: -Linda G. I Magnuson, Finance Director
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report -September 30, 2000
SUMMARY:
Submitted for the City Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of September
2000
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report —
Public Hearing Notification
— Resolution(s) _
Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk's office)
— Ordinance(s)
Other:
— Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1.' Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
Yes No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
N/A Yes No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
N/A Yes No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
N/A Yes No
REVIEWED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
JVq1ED
mes DeSteflnop
4no,
David A. Doyle
Linda
G. Magnuso
City Manager Deputy City Manager
Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 07, 2000
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement September 30, 2000
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City
Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the September 2000, Treasurer's Statement.
,FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for the Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of
September 2000. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of
bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from
investments.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
I
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
September 30, 2000
J��Glj�lll`�ING T124hISFER�
EI�QING
EC LA Glc . RE E PIS PAW,` E, A�IQd�� 1N {9>�i ::
&ALAiYCE
GENERAL FUND $15,377,638.22 $1,730,790,18 $2;484,420.28
$14,624,008.12
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND 100,592.40 930.05
99,662.35
COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FD 4,621.12
GAS TAX FUND 2,261,889.43 6,351.00 27,645.50
4,621.12
2,240;594.93
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD 1,566,857.98 38,434.10 107,331,70
1,497,960.38
TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD 1,483,850.41
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD 276,992.50 17,041,00 8,582.71
1,483,850.41
285,450.79
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD 162,233.10 1,486.35
160,746.75
FACILITIES & PARK DEVEL. FD 2,434,652,52 - 3,541.25
2,431,111.27
COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FID (52,078.86) 54,895.00 20,274.28
(17,458.14)
CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY FID 241,448.20 4,246.23
237,201.97
NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD 338,195.31
CA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP PREM 0.00 120,430.00
338,195.31
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD 564,869.35 7,235.86,
120,430.00
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD 237,059 .16 5,962.79
557,633.49
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD 19,817.88
231,096.37
GRAND AV CONST FUND 139,193D,88
319,123.00
.78
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD (312,026.20) 155,299.87 896,631,75
139,130,78
(1,053,358,08)
SELF NCE FUND 1 0434,195,,65
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 96 23,681.94
1,014,519.65
19,51.4.02
TOTALS $26,222,581''_.91 $2,123,241.15 $3,611,788.57 $0.00
$24,734,034.49
SUMMARY OF CASH
DEMAND DEPOSITS`.
($98,954:86)
COUNT
PAYROLL AC OUNT 1,605.77
CHANGE FUNq 250.00
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS ($96,599,09)
INVESTMENTS US TREASURY Money Market Acct. $715,927,23
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 24,114,706,35
TOTAL INVESTMENTS $24,830,633.58
TOTAL CASH
$24,734;034.49
Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested In the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment
Fund. All funds are available
withdrawal within 24 hours, Investment in the _Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed
fo
under the City's formally
investment policy.
adopted
As a secondary investment option, the City continues to maintain the Treasury
US Sweep Account�wlfh Wells Fargo. Any
excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis fro the City's bank accounts and are invested overnight into on investmen,
pool of US Treasury Notes, .Interest is credited
Y �o the City's bank account on a monthly basis
L.A.I.F - Effective Yield for September 2000 8,50290
Money Market -Effective Yield for August 2000 5.8061/8
All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy.
Thbove sum cry provides sufficient cash
flow liquidity to meet the next six month's
esti d I u s.
t
James DeStefano, Treasurer
F,
#
O
sLO
C
—
� ,co
L > L
W
U >, C6
-
O a
-
0
U Ln
��c co
a� w
_
C5
co
-
_ _ CO M_
UUc O
as
c�
M
d
W
T -
�
_ ko -
N
W
U
N �
ul
W
Q
W
o
LL
Q
Q
a
W
�
� Q
Qoo
�Z
N a
:
r .
4 ' p
1
PLEASE SEND NOTICES TO.
2
THOMAS P. CACCIATORE
3
99 South Lake Avenue, Suite 501
Pasadena, California 91101
4
(626) 795-0200
5
VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL & CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 7.099 3220 0005 7388 0753
6
City Clerk's Office
`7
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copely Drive,,: Suite 100
8
Diamond Bar, California 91765 '
9
Re: Claimant Juana Daly
10
Government Code Claim, § 910, et. seq.
11
Gentlemen:
92
An amended and supplemental claim is hereby made` pursuant to Government
13
Code § 910, et. seq.
14
15
16
Name of Claimant: Juana Daly
17
"Address of Claimant: 1358 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Apt. D
18
Diamond Bar, California 91765
19
=Date of Birth of Claimant: November 25, 1947
20
Date of Iniury: April 12 2000
21
Place of Injury: Intersection of Golden Springs Drive and
22
Gateway Center Drive, Diamond Bar, California
23
Description of Occurrence: On April 12, 2000, 'Erika Daly was driving a
24
1986 Toyota Tercel along Golden Springs Drive in a eastbound direction. The light for
25
her direction of travel was green as she approached the intersection of Gateway Center'
26
Drive. Suddenly, Fang Liu, who, had been travelling westbound on Golden Springs
27
28
I Drive turned left immediately in front of her, causing his car to crash into Erika ,Daly's
2 vehicle:
3- Erika Daly alleges that the intersection of Golden Springs Drive and
4 Gateway' Center Drive is a dangerous condition of public property in that the signal light
5 and sequence is unreasonably dangerous and defective in design. The sequencing of
6 the left turn traffic Eight for westbound' Golden. Springs creates a trap for east and west
7 traffic as defined by Government Code §830.8 because the governmental entities and
$ private entities that may be applicable knew with sufficient time to make corrections that
9
the type of signal created an increase of accidents among the motoring public.
10
Here, the physical characteristics of the signal create a hidden hazard for
11
which a suitable warning was not sufficient and which endangers careful motorists.
12
See Cameron v. State (1972),7 Cal.3d 318, 102 Cal.Rptr. 305. In this case, the
13
14 existing warning signs were inadequate to actually warn motorists such as Fang Liuof
15 the danger inherent in making a left turn herein. This is in partbecause-other
16 intersections immediately before the intersection in question also have left turn arrows,
17 but have reasonable yellow arrows after the green cycle, and then red arrows 'after the
18 yellow cycle, and then go to solid green. Further, in the space of approximately 1'/2
19 miles there are at least four different left turn green light and left turn arrow
20 configurations, each of which is different from the other. This further creates a trap for
21 unsuspecting motorists.: Further, the warning that is in place at the location is
22 ambiguous and confusing. It states "'Left Turn Yield on Green". This suggests that
23 motorists with a left turn arrow should "yield" even though the arrow may be a -protected
24 left turn signal, or that a' green light is not green, but yellow, or flashing yellow.
25 Further, the installation of the signal used at this location was an abuse of
26 discretion by a governmental official and in direct violation of Cal -Trans Traffic Manual
27 recommendations which require a recognition and avoidance of offset phasing at
28
1
intersections, particularly where..one approach right-of-way is: terminated while -the
2
opposing approach continues with a green indication, exactly what occurred at this
3-
location.
4
It is the claimant's contention and belief and is therefore alleged that the City of
5
Diamond Bar and the County of Los Angeles has been aware for a substantial period of
6
time that traffic signals that phase from protected left turn green arrows to a
7
non -protected interval with a circular green while opposing traffic continues with the
circular green is a highly dangerous and well known danger to the motoring public.
9
`
The installation of a sign to warn that a traffic signal is confusing and is itself, an
10
admission of the defective design of the signals. Yet, this signal, along with others like
11
it, continued to operate, directly causing Erika Daly's serious injuries.
12
At all times mentioned, Juana Daly was immediately following Erika Daly in
13
another car on their way home after retrieving keys when Juana Daly had been locked
14
15
out of her car. Juana Daly witnessed the accident involving her daughter and "Fang; Liu,
16
and as such, presents a claim in her own right under the guiding principles of,Dillion v.
17
Lego, and the cases following it. In that regard, Juana Daly suffered extreme emotional
g
and mental distress at seeing her daughter involved in the actual accident and seeing
19
the horrible injuries she sustained. Further, Juana Daly incurred medical expenses and
20
personal expenses and loss of time associated with the care and treatment of: her
21
daughter, as well as general damages associated with her own personal' loss of time
22
and loss of earnings.
23
Juana Daly further believes that the City of Diamond Bar and the County of Los
24
Angeles own and jointly operate this intersection in question.
25
Name of Public Employee
26
Involved: Unknown
27
Amount of Claim: Within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court
28
_
•L
7
co
0E0
E
_
6-
U o CD
-
UUcwO
00
r
r
r?
u
}� N
N O7
LL
0
w �
Qc m Q
N UI
m Q
Q IL
1 19
1i�! �.--o���i�l�iafli 4/ i � ry
i
R )
-,. B E
� � a � �' EL i.": �_ ae i
i'.U. Box 2268
Brea, CA 92822
141529.0217
Pg7tEN7 NAME - -- — ----
GARC: 1dl. AM
PLEASE ✓MACH AT PERFOPATiON AlVo RETJRN
TIENT ,rOCOJhJ" 1J !.a P
U SE MISSION DATE' - DISCHARGE
/ 7 ' Y' — 11
F J(l9 fiE..s„ , 1t
._ii.. (:
t
i. {.)lam✓'-..
DATE'
S11-4fiNG DATE
{l i�{i ;: x RAj'-A.E
..lf i
IrlsURartcr: covFP_ACE—POLICY MJMSER
\I'?l (.� , _i i, +,
'
.
Il"r-S CA 91745
r
SERVICE DATE
V DESCRIPTION CPT/RVS QTY.
�.
�'. {? Erb f ;1 '— — — --- — _
�Lll prf...Y (IF.i+II..I.A€. _
—y.
A;YtOUNT
t{?i: iJ-FE-';lTS
COMPLETE 4
V11=W ISS1 N.l mtrt:)c"{. o
x•. •'I �l3 C:I+ti "F�'t;E'N v : 00MG�E_i
lG. i ;t:L. � • I
I ' ty :s
! !"}'
2 LE11FL. BASIC
f
i
t
!
� f
,
I E.jI.;; oC"
1
t
f
r
!
IJ
I
€
!
I �
R
AliGl_S OR CREDITS NOT IN BUSINESS OFFICE f PATIENT ACCOUNT' NO,
THE TIME OF BILLING WILL BE BELLED TO YOU
L TOTAL
A LATER TIME.
TOTAL CREDITS
(SICIAN SERV!CES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS STATEMENT.
E } 00 '
TOTAL DUE
_RGENCY PHYSICIANS,RADIOLOGISTS,' PATHOLOGISTS &
`-STHESIOLOG1STS
WILL BILL YOU SEPARATELY,
E REVERSE SIDE FOR OUTS!DE LABORATORY INFORMATION.
� TCITAL
PATIENT
FILE
`V i�`'7` "'.�-.g t,'�" ., r a. '#n'
'n*�..r, r3 t •:a_ ✓:� s -,. '", v-�°�""t.�"ra..�a �, z4 za,' lc?.r�°it 4ti
=To
s f
4 y
a
w wxH
S" A
y
c �
r
sA S"?a r.fa.
u
$,F,N,4
{'8a `%` : ,yam
7maM"'.
— —.
Y o
A owl;
. � a, , �.
kh
S'
P m
r ktj
vEapK"
m a
May
gar+
4 r5q
� s ,
-
j0 7 y `
Ww MOM
"who Moms,
•
y} V
j
1104nomm MR
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO r
T0: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 REPORT DATE November 1,'2000
FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director.
TITLE: Extension of Vendor Services for Printing Services
SUMMARY: The City has utilized Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. to provide printing services for City business
cards, miscellaneousforms, and the fall issue of the Community Recreation Guide for a total expenditure of
$11,600 for the current fiscal year. In addition, they have been awarded the contract to publish the winter,
spring, and summer issues of the Community` Recreation Guide. Per the City's Purchasing Ordinance, awards
for services to a single vendor' in a fiscal year shall not exceed the City Manager's purchasing authority of -
$15,000 without authorization from the City Council. The combination of these printing services would bring
the total expenditure up to $50,000 for the current fiscal year. Funds for these services are already included
in the 2000/01 fiscal year budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: It recommended that the City Council authorize additional printing services to
be performed by Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the 2000/01 Fiscal Year.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report — Public Hearing Notification
Resolution(s) _ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's office)
Ordinance(s) Other:
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: NIA
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been
reviewed by the City Attorney? N/A Yes X No
2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A' Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? — Yes X No
What Commission? N/A
5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY: Department Head
James DeStef no Bab `ose
Interim City Manager Community Services Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
T0: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT; EXTENSION OF VENDOR SERVICES FOR PRINTING SERVICES
Issue Statement
Shall the City Council authorize additional printing services to be performed by Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. in
an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the 2000101 Fiscal Year?
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize additional printing services to be performed by Reinberger
Printwerks, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the 2000/01 Fiscal Year.
Financial Summary
Funds for the printing of business cards, miscellaneous forms and the publication of the Community Recreation
Guide are already included in the 2000/01 FY budget. The authorization to approve additional work to be
performed by this vendor will have no financial impact on the current fiscal year budget.
Background/Discussion
The City of Diamond Bar has utilized Reinberger Printwerks, Inc. to provide business cards, miscellaneous
forms, and the publication of the fall issue of the Community Recreation Guide for a total expenditure of
$11,600 for the current fiscal year. It has been more cost effective and timely to utilize Reinberger Printwerks,
Inc. as -they currently have the artwork for the City forms on file. In addition, they are the low bidder to publish
the winter, spring, and summer issues of the Community Recreation Guide. Staff is seeking City Council
authorization to expend up to $50,000 this fiscal year for printing expenditures with Reinberger Printwerks, Inc.
Funds for the publication of the Community Recreation Guide, City business cards, and miscellaneous forms
are already included in the 2000/01 FY budget. The authorization to approve additional work to be performed
by this vendor will have no financial impact on the current fiscal year budget
Prepared by:
Marsha Roa, Community Services Assistant
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. .
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 REPORT DATE: October 31, 2000
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Award of Inspection Services for Tracts 48487 & 50314
SUMMARY:
It is the intent of the developer, Windmill Dcvelopment/C&A Developers, to develop Tracts 48487 & 50314
simultaneously. Tracts 48487 & 50314 consists of a total thirty (30) single family residences on a total sixty-four (64)
acres in the Country. See attached Exhibits "A" and `B." The developer anticipates to commence construction in early
November 2000.
The City Council previously approved plan check services for Tracts 48487 & 50314 to Hall & Foreman, Inc. on
December 19, 1995, and December 1, 1998, respectively. For consistency and continuity, the City has assigned inspection
services for private developments to the on-call firm that has completed the plan check services for those improvement
plans.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award inspection services for Tracts 48487 & 50314 to Hall '& Foreman,
Inc. in an amount not -to -exceed $30,273.86'
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing
Resolution Bid Specification
_ Ordinance Other:
T Agreement
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
L Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been
reviewed by the City Attorney? X N/A Yes No
2. Does the report require a majority vote? Majority ' X Yes _ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X N/A _ Yes _ No
4. Has the, report been reviewed by a Commission? X N/A T Yes _ No
Which Commission?
5. Arc other departments affected by the report? X N/A Yes No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
I
hdnes DeSte o 4a;G. liu
Interim City M ager. Director of Public Works
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
e
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Award of Inspection Services for Tracts 48487 & 50314
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award inspection services for Tracts 48487 & 50314 to Hall& Foreman,
Inc. in an amount not -to -exceed $30,273.86,
FINANCIAL SSUMMARY: Inspection fees in the amount of $40,365.15 will be provided by the developer, Windmill
Development/C&A Developers, to fund the inspection services.
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSI ON:
It is the intent of the developer, Windmill Development/C&A Developers, to develop Tracts 48487 & 50314
simultaneously. Tracts 48487 & 50314 consists of a total thirty (30) single family residences on a total sixty-four (64)
acres in the Country. See attached Exhibits "A" and `B." The developer anticipates to commence construction in early
November 2000
The City Council previously approved plan check services for Tracts 48487 & 50314 to Hall & Foreman, Inc. on
December 19, 1995, and December 1, -1998, respectively. For consistency, and continuity, the City has, assigned inspection
services for private developments to the on-call firm that has completed the plan check services for those improvement
plans.
It is at the City's and the developer's best interest to have consistency between the plan check and inspection stages. Since
Hall & Foreman, Inc. conducted the plan cheek services, they would be most familiar with the project design issues,
requirements and sensitivities that must be adhered to during construction.
As per the contract service for engineering services (City Council approved October 6, 1998), seventy-five percent (75%)
of the inspection fee collected will be paid to the on-call firm as an not -to -exceed amount, and the remaining 'twenty-five
percent (25%) will be retained by the City for administrative services rendered. A not -to -exceed amount of $30;273.86
will be paid to Hall & Foreman, Inca
The associated inspection fees for the various improvements of the project are as follows
Grading = $24,252.10.
Storm Drain = 9,067.00
Sewer 3,141.20
Street = 3,904.85
Total $40,365.15
** Of this total amount ($40,365.15), 75% ($30,273.86) to Halt & Foreman, Inc. The remaining 25% ($10;091.29) to City for
administrative services rendered.
Prepared by: David G. Liu / John L. Ilasin
EXHIBIT «A�
+
r'
r
mw
i
waoM uxe
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
1LYA
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO •
TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 REPORT DATE: October 31, 2000
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Resolution 2000-xx: "A Resolution of the. City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Signal Improvements at Golden Springs
Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road in Said City and
Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids."
SUMMARY: Our City Traffic Engineer, Mr. Warren Siecke has designed and prepared the
plans and specifiicaions for left turn traffic signals at the intersections of Golden Springs Drive at
Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road. To expedite the
construction time, the two intersections have been incorporated into one set of plans and
specifications to be bid at one time.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Resolution 2000-xx: "A Resolution of
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Traffic
Signal Improvements at Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at
Sunset Crossing Road in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to
Receive Bids."
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification
X Resolution(s) X Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office)
Ordinances(s) _Other:
_
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following'affected departments:
Interim City M&nager
cAWord\ShwonU.-ends/Huls
David -G. Liu
Director of Public Works
XYes _No
Majority
N/A _ Yes No
N/A Yes No
_Yes —No
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO. _
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution 2000-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Signal
Improvements at Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar
Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road in Said City and Authorizing and
Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids."
ISSUE STATEMENT
To construct left turn traffic signal improvements at the intersections of Golden Springs Drive at Lemon
Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road'.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve Resolution 2000-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Signal Improvements at Golden Springs
Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road in Said "City and
Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids."
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
A total of $120,000 has been budgeted for the left turn traffic signal improvements at the two
intersections. The budget was prepared to reflect only the cost for left -turn signal at an intersection
without needs for upgrades. The breakdown for each intersection is as follows:
• $60,000 RDA - Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue
• $60,000 RDA — Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road
The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $244,000. Upon receiving the bids, staff will analyze the
information fully and bring back a budget recommendation for Council's consideration and approval.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Our City Traffic Engineer, Mr. Warren Siecke has designed and prepared the plans and specifications for
left -turn traffic signals at the intersections of Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond bar
Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road. The engineer's estimate is significantly more than budgeted. Due to
the age of the existing equipments (over 15 years old), it's necessary to replace the conduit systems as
well as upgrading all of the equipments to current standards. The upgrades include replacement of 8
heads with 12", new pedestrian heads, illuminated signs, new poles, wheelchair ramps and modifying the
median noses of Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue.
To exedite the construction time, the two intersections have been incorporated into one set of plans and
specifications to be bid at time.
i
Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor includes:
➢ Schedule to be submitted at least 10 calendar days before start of work;'
➢ Completion of all work within 90 calendar days; and
Liquidated damages of $500/day for non-performance.
Tentative schedule is as follows:
Approval of Plans and Specs
November 7, 2000
Bid Opening for Construction Contract
November 28, 2000
Award of Construction Contract
December 5, 2000
Notice to Proceed for Construction
December 18, 2000
End of Construction
April 30, 2001
Prepared by:
David G. Liu
1
2
RESOLUTION NO.2000
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
IMPROVEMENTS AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AT LEMON AVENUE AND
DIAMOND BEAR BOULEVARD AT SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE
BIDS.
WHEREAS; it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain
improvements in the City of Diamond Bar.
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented to
the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the Traffic Signal
Improvements, Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset
Crossing Road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing of the work
specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles
County, California, directing this 'notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of
Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or
before the hour of 2:00 o'clock p.m. on the 28th day of November, 2000, sealed bids or
proposals for the Traffic Signal Improvements, Golden Springs Drive at Lemon Avenue and
Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road:
Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite
100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City, of Diamond
Bar, California, marked, "Bid for the Traffic Signal Improvements, Golden Springs Driveat
Lemon Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road in the City of Diamond
Bar."
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required
to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per them wages for work of a similar character
in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate
1
of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department
of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per them wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to
any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
determinations to be posted at the job site.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Barg not more than fifty
dollars($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or
portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing
rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or
by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5: of the Labor Code as amended by
Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California
Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of
the work.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprentceable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee
nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in
that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to
journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to
journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has
exceeded an average of fifteen percent (15%) in the ninety (90) days prior to the request
for certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or
C. When the trade can show' that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of
his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established' for the
administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in
any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
2
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of
Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of 'Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices:
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in
the execution of this Contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall employ
with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as
set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended,
The Contractor shall forfeit, as apenalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars
($25:00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
him or any subcontractorunder him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute
the work required by this Contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or
bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least ten percent
(10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed
Contract if the same is awarded to him, and in the event of failure to enter into such Contract said
cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond
Bar.
If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for
said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and
material bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%n) of the contract price for said
work shall be given to secure thepayment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for
the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any
kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries
compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which' may
be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work.
3
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as an A and/or C-
10 contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations
adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of
Diamond Bar.
The work is to be done in; accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the
City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar,
California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnishedupon application to the City
of Diamond Bar and payment of $30.00, said $30.00 is non-refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated' above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of $10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead'.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Diamond Bar. In accordance with the requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as
set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost
and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Diamond Bar, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By
order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this day of
2000.
PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
California, this - day of , 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the
day of , 2000, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar, California
5
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Award of Contract to BonTerra Consulting to provide
Environmental Mitigation Monitoring services for Vesting Tract
Map. Nos. 48487 and 50314 (Windmill Development / JCC).
ISSUE STATEMENT: This report requests approval of a Professional Services
Agreement with BonTerra Consulting in order to provide
environmental services necessary to monitor > the mitigation
measures as outlined within the previously approved
Environmental Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tract Map Nos.
484$7 and 50314 located within The Country Estates.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the, City Council approve an agreement
between the City and BonTerra Consulting in the amount of
$83,172.00.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 48487 and 50314 were approved by the City Council in the
late 1990's. The combined project consists of thirty (30) homes upona 64 -acre site at the
terminus of Windmill Drive in the Country Estates. The applicant, Windmill Development / JCC,
has 'received all necessary approvals and has recently commenced vegetation clearance of the
site in preparation for grading activity anticipated to begin in mid-November.
The two tract map approvals incorporated development conditions and monitoring measures
necessary to ensure that the provisions of the approved environmental impact reports are
implemented. On October 19, 2000 the City distributed a Request for Proposal to thirteen (13)
firms to conduct post -grubbing / clearance biological mitigation monitoring services for Vesting
Tract Map Nos. 48487 and 50314. The City received three proposals for review on November
1, 2000. Proposals were received from Bonterra Consulting ($75,611.00), LSA ($84,884.00)
and Michael Brandman Associates ($83,450.00). Bonterra is currently, providing similar
services to the City for the Pulte Project.' Bonterra is an excellent firm for the requested services
and has provided the City with exceptional environmental services in years past.
The work program and budget for all tasks necessary to implement the five year Mitigation
Monitoring Program is $83,172.00' ($75,611.00 plus $7,561.00 contingency). The scope of work
outlined within the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be conducted over a five-year period.
Costs associated with processing and development of the project are funded through developer
fees paid by the project developer / applicant to the City. The developer has previously entered
into an Agreement for Payment of Preparation and Processing Costs for the development. .
Attachments: Request for Proposals
Bonterra Proposal for Mitigation Monitoring dated November 1, 2000
2
Request for Proposals
Biological Mitigation Monitoring for
Vesting Tentative Tracts 48487 and 50314
City of Diamond Bar
October, 19, 2000
Description of Approved Proiecis
JCC Homes is the developer for these two tracts. A total of 30 lots have been approved for the two tracts:
15 lots on 20 acres (Tract 48487) and 15 lots on 44 acres ('Tract 50314). Exhibit l shows the locations of
the two tracts. The tracts are located in hillside areas, westerly of Tonner Canyon. Both tracts are within
the private community known as "The Country" in the City of Diamond Bar.
Mitigation Monitoring Programs have been approved for each tract. Copies of the Biological Resources
sections of the respective Mitigation Monitoring Programs for each tract are attached to this RFP_
Scone of Work
The selected biological monitoring consultant will provide construction monitoring and related mitigation
monitoring services to the City of Diamond Bar to insure that the provisions of the Biological Resources
requirements in the approved'' Mitigation Monitoring Programs for each tract are implemented. The
monitor will begin work at the beginning of the grading phase for the projects; monitoring of grubbing
and clearing of the tracts will be completed prior to issuance of an authorization to proceed for this scope
of work. Copies of documents specified below for review will be provided to the selected monitoring
consultant after contract award.
The following tasks are required of the biological monitoring consultant:
• Review and comment on oak woodland and walnut woodland revegetation and landscape
plans prepared by the applicant
+ Review mitigation requirements contained in the approved U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404, permit, State Water Resources Control 'Board Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, and California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement;
insure the 'biological resources mitigation requirements of these permits/agreements are
'13
implemented.
Conduct field monitoring during grading to insure that the biological resources requirements
of the Mitigation Monitoring Programs are implemented `
• Monitor implementation of revegetationlmitigation programs from initial installation through
the five year monitoring period specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Programs.
a Provide monitoring reports to the City as required by the Mitigation Monitoring Programs.
a Attend progress meetings,construction field meetings, and other meetings as required
throughout the five year monitoring period.
St VPNtx4848750314oct00.doc
-
Costs
Provide a summary of the costs of implementing the scope of work described above. The cost proposal
should include the following for each task, labor hours and fees and estimated reimbursable expenses.
The billing rates used to derive the labor fees must be included.
Required Proposal Contents
The proposal response shall be limited to 10 pages, excluding resumes and cover letter. The following
minimum contents must be provided for the proposal to be considered responsive:
1. Name, address, and telephone number of the company. The designated principal, project
manager, and key staff shall be named. Resumes for each shall be provided.
2. Proposed approach to be used in accomplishing the scope of work described herein.
3. Description of the tasks to be accomplished in performing;, the scope of work throughout
the five year monitoring period.
4 Proposed costs to complete the scope of work.
5 List of three mitigation monitoring projects that involved a similar 'scope of work,
including name and telephone number of an individualwho can be contacted as a
reference.
6. Statement of commitment to start work immediately upon receipt of authorization to
proceed from the City.
Proposal Schedule
Proposals due at City Hall November 1, 2000, by 12:00 p.m.
Selection of Consultant and November 7, 2000
City Council Approval of Contract
Consultant Selection Process
Each proposal will be evaluated to determine if it meets the submittal requirements specified above.
Failure to meet the requirements will be cause for rejection of the proposal. The City will evaluate the
ppw ll not necessarily work, and be selected The selected consultant to deterrmine the best value to the City. The lowest priced
proposal Y will be' a consultant to the City; the
applicant will pay the costs for the consultant's work specified in the proposed work program. The City
may. reject any proposalifit is conditional or contains irregularities. The City may waive deviations in
any proposal if it is determined to be otherwise responsive, but this shall not modify the proposal
document or excuse the Consultant from compliance with contract requirements if the Consultant is
awarded a contract. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals responding to
this RFP without indicating.any reason for such rejection(s).
The City shall not be liable in any way for any expenses incurred by Consultants, in responding to this
RFP. Consultants shall not include any such expenses as part of the costs to complete the scope of work.
Proposal
for
Biological Mitigation Monitoring
Vesting Tentative Tracts 48487 and 54314
4
Submitted By:
Eea'?�-
C 0 N S U L
151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200
Costa Mesa, California 92626
(714) 444-9199
Contact: Thomas E: Smith, Jr., AICP
Principal
Task 1.2: Field Reconnaissance
BonTerra (two staff) will accompany the City and the applicant on a field
reconnaissance to review the status of the grading program for Tracts 48487 and
50314 and the candidate on-site and off-site locations for the oak and walnut mitigation
programs. It is assumed that one six-hour field day will be required to complete this
reconnaissance. if off-site locations have not beenidentified by the City, BonTerra can
conduct a survey for candidate sites under separate budget authorization with prior
City approval.
Task 2: , Review of Mitigation Plans and Permit Requirements
Task 2.1: Review Permit Requirements of Regulatory Agencies
Permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board
RW
QCB will be reviewed. The intent of this reviewrs to insure that mitigation
measures required by the permits are consistent with the mitigation measures specified
in the MMPs. A memorandum summarizing BonTerra's comments will be submitted
to the City:
Task 2.2: Review Mitigation Plans
BonTerra will review the'oak/walnut, riparian mitigation plans, and project landscape
plans for conformance to: biological mitigation measures in the adopted MMPs;
requirements of the regulatoryagency, permits; and generally accepted mitigation and
restoration practices. As part of the review, any on-site oak trees proposed for
relocation will be reviewed in the field to determine their overall quality and health and
the potential for successful relocation. Relocation receiving sites within the two tracts
will also be reviewed for acceptability. A review memorandum will be submitted to the
City with recommended' revisions.
Task 2.3: Project Management and Coordination Activities
BonTerra will coordinate with the applicant and the City concerning the status of the
various tasks in this phase.
Task 3: Conduct Field Monitoring During Grading/Construction
Task 3.1 Attend Construction Meetings
The BonTerra biological monitor will attend construction meetings with the applicant's
grading contractor, landscape installation company, project engineer, and other project
team members periodically as needed during the estimated six-month grading period.
We have assumed a total ,of 40 hours for this task. Elements of project
grading/construction that are expected to require these meetings include:
--at initiation of grading and weekly during grading
--after installation of interim (during grading) and long-term (during home-
construction) erosion/drainage control measures
Page 3
Page 4
PROPOSALFEES
BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
VTTM Nos 48487 and 50314
November 1, 2000
Fees
The proposal fees for the biological mitigation monitoring are provided below:
Task 1:
Project Initiation
Task 1.1: Kickoff Meeting
Hours: 8 $720.00
Task 1.2: Field Reconnaissance
Hours: 12 1,080.00
Subtotals Task 1:
$1,800:00
Hours: 20
Administrative/Clerical - 10% 180.00
Reimbursables 75.00
Total Budget Task 1:
2,055:00
Task 2:
Review of Mitigation Plans and Permit Requirements
Task 2.1: Review Permit Requirements 1,565.00
of Regulatory Agencies
Hours:16
Task 2.2: Review Mitigation Plans. 2,140.00
Hours: 22
Task 2.3 Project Management and Coordinatim1200.00
Hours: 12
Subtotals Task 2:
$4,905.00
Hours: 50
Administrative/Clerical - 10% 490.00
Reimbursables 60.00
Total Budget Task 2:
$5,455.00
Task 3: -
Conduct Field Monitoring During Grading/Construction
Task 3.1: Attend Construction Meetings
Hours: 40 3,400.00
Task 3.2: Biological Monitoring During Grading 14,400.00'
Hours: 192 (6 months)
Task 3.3: Prepare Progress Reports 900.00
Hours: 10
Subtotals Task 3:
$18,700.00
Hours: 242
Administrative/Clerical - 5% 1 935.00
j
Page 8
Reimbursables $1,500.00
Total Budget Task 3:
$21,135.00
Task 4: Monitor Implementation of Revegetation/Mitigation Plans
(During installation and for 5,years thereafter)
Task 4.1: . Perform Monitoring of Oak/Walnut 4,800.00
and Riparian Habitat Installation
Hours: 60
Task 4.2: Perform Monitoring for Oak/Walnut 22,400.00
and Riparian Habitat Mitigation Sites
Hours:. 280 ,(5 years)
Task 4.3 Project Management and 8,550.00
Coordination
Hours: 90 (5 years)
Task 4.4 Attend Progress Meetings and Field '4,750.00
Meetings
Hours: 50 (5 years)
Subtotal Task 4:
$40,500.00
Hours: 480
Cost of Living Increase for Tasks 4.1 to 4.4 in
Years 2 and 4 (3% each of two years) 2,466.00
Reimbursable Expenses (5 years) 4;000.00
Total Budget Task 4:
$46,966.00
Subtotal Fees/Expenses all Phases.
$75,611.00
Recommended Contingency at City's ` 7,561.00
Discretion (10%)
TOTAL FEESIEXPENSES AND CONTINGENCY
$83,172.00
Page 9
C o +v s v t r I N c THOMAS E. SMITH, A., AICP
`PRINCIPAL
Master of Architecture & Urban Planning, Environmental Planning Specialty
University of California, Los Angeles, 1976
Bachelor of Arts, Social Ecology
University of California, Irvine, 1974
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) # 3783, 1979
Mr. Smith has been involved in environmental planning and impact assessment since the early
1970s. His experience includes responsible positions with public agencies as well as consulting
companies. Since 1979, Mr. Smith has been a consultant to federal, state, and local agencies, and
real estate developers, architecture and engineering companies, lawyers, and other private industry
clients. Project specialities include large scale planned communities, water and wastewater
treatment facilities, landfills, and hazardous materials site assessments.
Representative Project Experience:
Currently serving as, Project Director for the preparation of an EIR for the Hughes-Fullerton
Reuse Project (Amerige Heights) in the City of Fullerton. The Amerige Heights Specific
Plan proposes reuse of the approximate 300-acre project site with residential, commercial,
light industrial and open-space uses. The project involves a general plan amendment, zone
change, and specific plan. The project site is located within a developed area in the eastern
portion of the City of.Fullerton and is surrounded ;primarily by residential uses. Key
environmental issues being addressed include traffic, land use compatibility, aesthetics, and
Impacts to schools.
Client: LSFII`Fullerton, 1999 to present
Project Director for the preparation of a mixed-use master plan, planned commercial
development/planned industrial development permit programs, and Program EIR for
redevelopment of an existing aerospace manufacturing facility on 'a 244-acre site in the
Kearny Mesa community of San Diego. The project site was a key facility in ,the
development of the Atlas Missile and related manned space vehicles. Vernal pool and
related sensitive plants and animals were located in areas proposed for development.
Historical resource issues were also evaluated to determine the potential impacts of the
project and the historical importance of the site and contributing facilities. Key issues
evaluated in the EIR included sensitive biological resources,' traffic, air quality, land use
compatibility, and historical resources.
Client: General Dynamics, 1994-1997
Project Director for preparation of a specific plan and EIR for redevelopment of a 300-acre
aerospace manufacturing and maintenance facility in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
site included developed facilities as well as adjacent open space areas that had been
devoted to agricultural' uses. The City's Industrial Area Specific Plan, prepared in the early
manus, had designated t
manufacturinhe property and, adjacent areas for industrial and light
g uses which were no longer marketable. The specific plan proposed a mixed-
use project incorporating retail and business park uses, a hotel/conference facility, a
Metrolink commuter train facility, and an 18-hole golf course designed by Arnold Palmer.
The EIR and specific plan were prepared on a fast track schedule,
and,receiveCit
Council approval within 14 months. The issues evaluated in the EIR included traffc nd
circulation, hazardous materials contamination, land use compatibility, biological resources,
ca NsvcrrNG MELISSA A. HOWE
Page 3'
Currently performing implementation monitoring and coordination to facilitate compliance with
program specifications and the ultimate successful establishment of coastal sage scrub habitat.
Client: Capital Pacific Holdings, LLC, 1996 -present `
Project manager responsible for the development of conceptual riparian woodland habitat
creation plan for 86 acres of riparian revegetation within a major flood control project in
northern San Diego County. Coordinated with both public and Private landowners as well as
the CDFG and USACE in an effort to satisfy mitigation requirements and maintain the biological
value of the creek system while providing adequate flood control measures, as well as providing
visual and recreational amenities for current andfutureurban development: Supervised the
development of implementation level plans and provided implementation monitoring to facilitate
compliance with mitigation requirements. Current)
rmance and
maintenance monitoring to assess`; compliance with required perng for an erowthesta dards and
provide remedial measures to ensure the successful establishment of riparian and wetland
species. Responsible for documenting site's overall progress and compliance with
performance standards and for providing annual mitigation summaries to USACE and CDFG.
Client: City of San Marcos, 1992 -present
Project man
ager mitigation planning for a 727 -acre residential site in Peralta Hills,
California. Offsite mitigation was required as compensation for project impacts to CDFG and
USACE jurisdiction. Identified Offsite mitigation opportunities within County of Orange, City of
Anaheim, and private landowner's open space areas based on project, County of Orange,
I
CDFG, and USACE requirements. Developed a conceptual mitigation program that
incorporates both participation in the Santa Ana Canyon Mitigation BankArundo donax removal
program and wetland/riparian creation at offsite locations. Developed detailed mitigation
installation programs for both onsite and offsite mitigation areas (21 acres) in cooperation with
County of Orange and resource agency requirements. Currently responsible for
implementation coordination and monitoring for onsiteloffsite mitigation areas.
Client: CH2MHill, 1996 to present
Project manager ,responsible for developing a 4.0 -acre conceptual mitigation plan and
implementation level habitat creation program for impacts to coastal sage scrub resulting from
project construction for a residential site in Santa Margarita, California. Both conceptual and
detailed programs were developed in compliance with County of Orange, USFWS, and CDFG
requirements as specified in the approved Special 4
specifications for 1) site preparation; specificalllines and
y the(d conteolnit and t ofartichoke
d included choke
thistle, mustard, and tree tobacco, 2) seed collection, 3) seed mix application, 4) long term site
maintenance, 5) long term growth performance monitoring, 6) documentation of site conditions
and compliance with required performance standards, and 7) coordination with the County of
Orange and USFWS. Provided implementation monitoring and coordination to facilitate
compliance with program specifications and the ultimate successful establishment of coastal
sage scrub habitat. Currently monitoring long-term site performance and maintenance activities
as part of a five-year program.
Client: RSM Management Company, 1996 to present
Project manager responsible for implementation and performance monitoring programs for
various Orange County, San Diego, and Los Angeles Cou nty revegetation/restoration projects
totaling up to 90 acres. Performs qualitative and quantitative surveys of sites to assess plant
�
C O N S U 1 T f N G MELISSA A. HOWE
Page 5
use of the site for recreational purposes (county bikepaths, hiking trails, etc.). Also "provided
guidelines for habitat revegetation and existing coast live oak and California sycamore
transplantation. Guidelines included planting/transplantation methodology, site preparation
methods, and long-term maintenance and performance monitoring requirements.
Client: County of Orange, February -March, 1996
Developed a resources management plan for a 585 -acre residential development site in Tonner
Canyon, Los Angeles County, California. The plan provided for the short- and long-term
management of existing coastal sage scrub, oak woodland, walnut woodland, and riparian
woodland habitats during and following project construction; it also included short term
protection measures to be implemented during project construction as well as long term
preservation and management guidelines. that addressed urban/open space interface issues
and ongoing recreational uses of the site. The resources management program also provided
for the restoration and enhancement of existing native habitats and included conceptual
implementation methodology, long term performance guidelines, and long term maintenance
guidelines;
Client: Estate of Albert Levinson, May -April, 1995
i
Developed a conceptual dascrt riparian habitat mitigation program and associated incremental
costs analysis as compensation for project impacts to USACE and Arizona Game and Fish
Department (AGED) jurisdiction within the Arroyo Chico Wash, Tucson, Arizona. Mitigation
program guidelines addressed desert,riparian habitat revegetation/creation and enhancement
within flood control basins and improved flood control channels of the Arroyo Chico Wash. Site
specific guidelines consisted of: 1) site preparation methodology; 2) planting and seeding
methodology; 3) native riparian vegetation salvage techniques; 4) long-term site maintenance;
5) long-term growth performance and maintenance monitoring; and 6) mitigation site status
documentation and reporting requirements. An incremental
cost analysis was performed s
_ , Y a ed to
P
evaluate revegetation and enhancement alternatives for cost effectiveness. Ms. Howe utilized
the Ohmart & Anderson method of habitat evaluation to determine appropriate habitat units;
this included identifying revegetated habitat' structure, habitat type; regional habitat location,
etc. She coordinated with local landscape maintenance firms in an effort to determine
appropriate unit costs to be assigned to the various implementation tasks. Habitat units and
costs per habitat unit were identified and, via the incremental costs analysis, the most cost
effective quantifies and methods of revegetation implementation were identified.
Client: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1995-1996
Provided construction monitoring and participated in vernal pool habitat salvage activities during
the demolition of U.S. Navy radio transmission towers in San Diego, California. Habitat salvage
activities consisted of the hand removal and temporary storage of vernal pool topsoils and
seed bank materials. Vernal pool inoculum materials were stored in cardboard boxes for future
re-application in appropriate habitat creation areas. Dominant vernal "pool species included
Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii, Psilocarpus brevissimus, Lythrum hyssopfolium, Juncus
bufonius, and Spergularia villosa. Construction monitoring was performed to facilitate the
protection of preserved vernal pool and coastal sage scrub habitats and included coordination
with construction personnel during the placement of protective fencing' adjacent to protected
habitat areas and the placement of protective metal plates oververnal pool habitats designated
C O N s u i r! H c AMBER S. ONEAL
ECOLOGIST
Bachelor of Science, Ecology & Evolution
Bachelor of Science,Environmental Studies
University of California, Santa Barbara, 1998
Ms. Oneal is an Ecologist with approximately two years of experience in environmental
documentation (California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and
Federal Endangered Species Act). She `has performed impact analysis for many environmental
resource issue areas, including biology, geology, air quality, land use, infrastructure and visual
resources, solid waste, hazardous' waste, and pollution prevention. She has now,. concentrated her
efforts on biological resources and has performed biological surveys, mitigation' monitoring, and
habitat evaluations. Ms. Oneal is familiar with the flora and fauna of Southern California, and has
field experience in the areas of wildlife and botanical identification as well as vegetation mapping.
She has conducted both general and directed surveys for biological resources surveys for plants
and wildlife listed as sensitive of endangered under state and federal laws and regulations. Ms.
Oneal has also completed coursework in the areas of environmental law, environmental impact
analysis, endangered species management, experimental design, and field techniques. inaddition,
she has also completed a senior honors thesis on the topic of habitat conservation planning.
Representative Project Experience:
Participated in general plant and wildlife surveys, as well as vegetation mapping of 3,000 acres
of open space in the foothills of San Dimas. The purpose -of the survey was to identify potential
for special status biological resources, and make recommendations for the General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change Specific Plan.
Client: City of San Dimas, 1999
Participated in general plant and wildlife surveys, and vegetation mapping of 470 acres of open
space in the City of San Juan Capistrano. The purpose of the survey was to identify potential
impacts to biological resources, and provide mitigation measures for the Whispering Hills
project, which proposed to build single family residential lots and a golf course.
Client: Concorde Development, 1999
Participated in general plant and wildlife. surveys, and vegetation mapping of 159 acres of open
space in the City of Yucaipa. The purpose of the survey was to identify potential impacts to
biological resources, and provide mitigation measures for the Robinson Ranch North project,
which proposed to build single famity residential lots and a commercial center with a movie
theater, hotel, and several types of retail.
Client: Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, 1999
Participated in general plant and wildlife surveys, and vegetation mapping of approximately 30
acres of open space in the City of Yucaipa. The purpose of the survey was to identify, potential
impacts to biological resources, and provide mitigation measures for the Washington Street
Improvements project, which proposed to widen the existing street to a 110 -foot right-of-way
and construction of a new storm drain system.
Client: Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, 1999
C0NSULrING AMBER S.ONEAL
Page 2
Lead ecologist in general plant and wildlife surveys, and vegetation mapping of approximately
15 acres of open space in the City of Lake Forest. The purpose of the survey was to identify
the potential constraints to development due to special status biological resources for the
Regency Park project, which proposed to build a park.
Client: City of Lake Forest, 1999
Participated in general plant and wildlife surveys, and vegetation mapping of approximately 36
acres of located in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles and Ventura counties near the cities
of Agoura Hills and Westlake Village,. The purpose of the survey was to identify the potential
constraints to development due to special status biological resources for the Reyes Adobe
School project, which proposed to build a middle school.
Client: Las Virgenes School District, 1999
Participated in an oak tree survey for the Bouquet Canyon project in Los Angeles' County.
Efforts included tagging each tree, and recording its size, health and aesthetic value.
Client: Crouse/Beers & Associates, 1999
Participated in annual monitoring of the Las Flores Revegetation project in Orange County.
Efforts included line-intersect sampling and rating .the health of container species planted on
the site.
Client: Vintage Homes, 1999
Participated in Parry's tetracoccus and white coast ceanothus focused surveys for the Vista
Palisades Estates in San Diego County. Efforts included: quadrat data collection, analysis and
documentation.
Client: Capital Pacific Holdings, 1999
Participated in a southwestern pond turtle trapping efforts at Bonita Canyon Dam. Efforts
included setting up traps, marking turtles caught, and recording information on their size, sex,
and age.
Client: The Irvine Company, 1999
Participated in spring surveys for special statins plants for the Vista Palisades Estates in San
Diego County. Special status species included thread-leaved brodiaea, San Diego thornmint
Palmer's grappling hook, decumbent goldenbush, and ashy spikemoss. Efforts included
documentation of the special status species found.
Client: Capital Pacific Holdings, 1`999
Participated in a General Habitat Assessment for the Quino checkerspot butterfly for the 160=
acre Murrieta Hot Springs project site. Efforts
included udetl
assessing qualities es of the :site to
determine the potential for Quino, and recording the location of plantain (the butterfly's
foodplant) found on the site.
Client: Hewitt and McGuire, 1999
C o N s u c r r N G RICHARD B. LEWIS, III
ECOLOGIST
Bachelor of Science, Biology
Pacific Union College, Angwin, California, 1988
Mr. Lewis is a field biologist and educator with over six years of professional experience as a
biological consultant. Mr. Lewis is responsible for monitoring restoration/mitigation projects,
developing habitat mitigation programs; coordinating with contractors, assisting with tree surveys,
preparing GIS vegetation and restoration maps He has performed a variety of surveys, including
focused surveys for sensitive avian species such as the southwestern 'willowflycatcher (Empidonax
trafflYextimus) and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). Mr. Lewis
conducted focused surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher in a base-wide survey of U.S.
Marine Corps Base at Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, in 1993. Mr. Lewis served as primary
permittee and conducted focused surveys for the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl (Glaucidium
brasi/ianum cactorum) and southwestern willow flycatcher in Arizona. He also worked as a NEPA
planner, preparing environmentaldocuments for such clients as the Arizona 'Department of
Transportation(ADOT) and the Flood Control District of'Maricopa County (FCDMC). Mr. Lewis was
also federally permitted in Arizona to study the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Mr. Lewis
conducted focused surveys and nest monitoring for the southwestern willow flycatcher along the
San Pedro and Gila Rivers in southeastern Arizona for the Arizona Game & Fish Department
(AGFD). Mr. Lewis has also performed constraints-level biological analysis of proposed project
sites for the DPW.
Representative Project Experience:
Monitored site preparation and planting of 1,500 container plants for the Saddleback Community
Church Bridge Habitat Mitigation Program.
Client` The Keith Companies, 1999 to present.
Monitored creation of 0.1-acre pond and 2.0-acre riparian habitat for the habitat mitigation
program for Bonita Canyon Dam in Irvine. Supervised grading, rock placements and
redistribution of duff materials. Currently monitoring irrigation and planting activities on site.
Client: The Irvine Community Development Company, 1999 to present.
Monitored planting of native plants as part of the coastal sage scrub mitigation implementation
program for the Talega Valley Development Project - Site B. Also assisted with evaluation of
seeding success.
Client: Talega Development Company, 1999 to present.
Prepared maps, surveyed riparian trees and prepared coast live oak and cherry woodland
mitigation documents for the Tesoro del Valle development in the Santa Clarita area.
Client: SunCal Companies, 1999 to present.
Served as Project Manager and lead biologist for a cactus ferruginous pygmy owl survey in the
City of Phoenix. The pygmy owl survey was conducted under USFWS protocol along a ten-mile
project right-of-way in the vicinity of South Mountain Park. Utilized Trimble TSC1/Asset
Surveyor for `call point' navigation. Coordinated extensively with USFWS personnel to create
a detailed, project-specific survey methodology within the framework of the proposed two-year
clearance survey protocol.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.,
T0: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
REPORT DATE: November 2, 2000
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Amendment to the SGVCOG Joint Exercise`of Powers Agreement
SUMMARY: The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) was established by a Joint
Powers Agreement; the City is a party to the Agreement and a member of the SGVCOG. The membership
of the SGVCOG amended the Agreement and created the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority
for the purpose of implementing the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Project. By January, the rate of
expenditures will increase as the project moves forward, with funding provided through Federal and State
grants. Federal and State funding is reimbursed in arrears after invoices have been paid. Thus, the
Authority staff have determined that the Authority will experience cash flow difficulties by early 2001 as it
lets more contracts to implement the ACE Project. If is been'determined that short term borrowing will be
the best course of action to solve cash flow concerns.
The first step in authorizing short term borrowing is to amend the SGVCOG Agreement to provide for the
power to borrow, incur indebtedness and/or issue bonds. The adoption of the amendment will have no
effect whatsoever on the City's liability, creditworthiness or its own ability to issue debt.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopt the
attached Resolution approving and adopting an amendment to the San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments (SGVCOG) Joint Powers Authority Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: XX Staff Report — Public Hearing Notification
XX Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office)
_ Ordinance(s) Other:
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
I
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
N/A Yes
No
by the City Attorney?
2.
Does the report require a majority vote?_
Yes
No
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
N/A Yes
No
4. "
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
N/A Yes
_
No
Which, Commission?
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
Yes
No
RE l WED Y:
M
000
Ja s DeStefano Ilivid Doyle
Interim City Manager Deputy City Manager
k
Todd Strojny
Sr. Administrative Assistant
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Amendment to the SGVCOG Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Should the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving and adopting
an amendment to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCQG)
Joint Powers Authority Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement by adding the power to borrow money, incur indebtedness and/or
issue bonds for the benefit of the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Project and to be
repaid exclusively from funds pledged or designated for the ACE Project and
relieve the City from any liability whatsoever arising from such borrowing?
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopt the
attached Resolution approving and adopting an amendment to the San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) Joint Powers Authority Amended and
Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
There is no financial impact on the City in connection with the approval of the
attached Resolution amending the SGVCOG Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) was established by
a Joint Powers Agreement (the "Agreement") .entered; into as of March 1, 1994.
The City is a party to the Agreement and a member of the SGVCOG. The
membership of the SGVCOG amended the Agreement, effective September,17,
1998, creating the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority ("Authority") for
the purpose of implementing the Alameda Corridor East Project ("ACE Project"),
consisting of improvements at 55 grade crossings on Union Pacific Railroad
routes throughout the San Gabriel Valley; The Authority is proceeding to
implement the ACE Project. To date, the ACE Project funding requirements
have been fairly modest and primarily addressed by a loan from the City of
Industry and by MTA grants that are disbursed on a reimbursement basis as
debts come due. However, by the beginning of the new year, the rate of
expenditures will increase as the project moves forward and Federal and State
grants will become the predominant source of funds. Federal and State funding
is reimbursed in arrears after invoices have been paid. Thus, the Authority staff
have determined that the Authority will experience cash flow difficulties by early
2001 as it lets more contracts to implement the ACE Project. The Authority has
retained financial advisors and bond counsel to advise it with respect to financial
alternatives. The advisors in consultation with Authority staff have determined
that short term borrowing will be the best course of action to solve cash flow
concerns.
The first step in authorizing short term borrowing is to amend the SGVCOG
Agreement to provide for the power to borrow; incur indebtedness and/or issue
bonds. The short term borrowing that is contemplated is a'tax exempt
commercial paper issue which is essentially a short term bond issue. The
interest and principal on the issue will only be payable from monies pledged or
otherwise designated for the ACE Project: If,the amendment authorizing
borrowing is not expeditiously approved by members of the SGVCOG, the
Authority will experience a cash shortfall and will have to curtail Project progress
until an alternate means of cash flow financing is in place.
There is one major issue that City staff has identified and which has been
adequately addressed in the JPA and the proposed amendment. The issue is
whether the City is exposed to any liability as a result of the amendment. Section
16 of the Agreement, adopted pursuant to the express authorization of
Government Code section 6508.1, provides that:
"ftjhe debts, liabilities and obligations of the Council shall be the debts,
liabilities or obligations of the Council alone. No Member of the Council
shall be responsible, directly or indirectly, for any obligation, debt or
liability of the Council, whatsoever." (The term "Member of the Council"
refers to the member cities of the San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments.)
Moreover, the proposed amendment states that any borrowing thereunder shall
be for the purpose of financing the ACE Project and shall be repaid solely from
funds pledged or otherwise designated for the ACE Project. Accordingly, the
adoption of the amendment to the JPA and subsequent issuance of debt by the
SGVCOG will have no effect whatsoever on the City's liability, creditworthiness
or its own ability to issue debt.
The financing transaction will take several months to complete. The Authority
estimates that, it will encounter cash flow difficulties by February 2001.
Accordingly, adoption of the amendment to the SGVCOG Agreement by at least
16 members as soon as possible is essential to complete the financing and
provide the necessary cash flow to the Authority by late January 2001.
Prepared by: Todd Strojny
RESOLUTIONNO. 2000 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS JOINT POWERS
AUTHORITY AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments ("SGVCOG") was
established by that certain Joint Powers Authority Agreement (the "Agreement")
entered into as of March 1, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City is a party to the Agreement and a member of the SGVCOG;
and
WHEREAS, the membership of the SGVCOG amended the Agreement, effective
September 17, 1998, creating the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority
("Authority") for the purpose of implementing the Alameda Corridor East Project
("ACE Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority is proceeding to implement the ACE Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project is being funded by Federal, State and local agency grants
that are disbursed on a reimbursement basis; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that to responsibly manage the ACE
Project and meet its cash flow requirements the SGVCOG needs the express
power to borrow money; and
WHEREAS, the SGVCOG may obtain the power to borrow money to resolve the
cash flow needs of the Authority only by amending the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, unless the authority to borrow money as set forth below, is granted by
adoption of this Resolution by the Members of the SGVCOG, the Authority will
experience a cash shortfall thereby negatively impacting continuing progress on
the ACE Project; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Resolution will not result in any additional liability for
the City, nor affect the City's creditworthiness in any manner whatsoever;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1, That Paragraph B, entitled "Common Powers" of Section 4, entitled
"Purposeand Powers of the Council" of the Agreement is hereby amended by
adding subparagraph 15 to read as follows:
(15) Borrow money, incur indebtedness and/or issue bonds pursuant to the
Constitution of the State of California and any of the laws of the State of
California and to exercise any implied power necessary to exercise the
express powers provided for in this subparagraph 15, provided,
however, the any borrowing hereunder shallbe for the purpose of
financing the Project, as defined in Section 27 of this Agreement and
shall be repaid solely from funds pledged or otherwise designated for
the Project. Borrowings authorized hereunder shall be subject to
Section 16 of this Agreement.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall
transmit certified copy of it immediately upon its adoption to the San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of November, 2000.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and; approved at a regular meeting of the
Cit Council it of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 7th day of November, 2000, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: CHANG, HERRERA, HUFF, MPT/ANSARI,
M/O'CONNOR
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 'NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
-, T
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 6, I
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 REPORT DATE: November 3, 2000
FROM: James De Stefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Amendment No. I to Professional Services Agreement with SPACES to include Construction
Bid Analysis/Negotiation Services relative to the relocation of City Hall to the AQMD Facility
and Appropriate the Necessary Funds ($4;000) from General Fund Reserves
SUMMARY: On September 5, 2000 the City contracted with SPACES to provide space planning and design
services relative to the proposed relocation of the City Hall offices to the AQMD facility. At that time,
SPACES included two optional services, bid analysis/negotiation services and construction management
services, for the City to consider. City staff is recommending that the City utilize the expertise of SPACES to
assist with the analysis of both the preliminary construction bids and the final construction bids.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve amendment number 1 to the professional service agreement
between the. City of Diamond Bar and SPACES to include construction bid analysis & negotiation services
relative to the proposed move to the AQMD facility and appropriate $4,000 from General Fund reserves.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification
_ Resolutions Bid Specification (on l file in City Clerk's Office)
Ordinances
Agreements
EXTERNAL` DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney? n/a
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed' by a Commission?
Which Commission? Planning Commission
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
49Q]—f
Jardes DeStefan
Interim City Manager
Yes
X Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
David Doyle
Deputy City Manager
M
No
X No
X No
X No
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
DATE: November 7, 2000
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with
SPACES to include Construction Bid Analysis/Negotiation
Services relative to the relocation of City Hall to the AQMD
Facility and Appropriate the Necessary Funds ($4,000) from
General Fund Reserves
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize an amendment to the existing contract
between the City and SPACES to include construction bid analysis and negotiation
services and appropriate ($4,000) for these services.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
The current contractual agreement between SPACES and the City is for $17,000. The
inclusion of these additional services will increase the contract by ($4;000) for a total
contract amount of ($21,000).
Significant additional expenses related to the relocation of City Hall will be incurred in
the future including construction of the required tenant improvements (approximately
$275,000). The City will also incur additional costs for moving the existingequipment to
the new facility, installation of fiber backbone and network cabling, utility relocation
costs, as well as additional furniture, fixtures and equipment, as necessary.
BACKGROUND:
On September 5, 2000 the City contracted with SPACES to provide space planning and
design services relative to the proposed relocation of the City Hall offices to the AQMD
facility. At that time, SPACES included two optional services, bid analysis/negotiation
services and construction management services, for the City to consider. The City may,
at the time the construction contract is awarded, contract for construction management
services ($4,000). However, staff will return to the City Council prior to any
authorization to SPACES to proceed with construction management services
1
DISCUSSION:
At that time the contract was executed, City staff did not know the extent of the
construction required to accommodate the City's needs. We now know that because of
the required number of offices and specialty areas such as a computer server room, etc.
the bid process will include many detailed items that need to be careful reviewed to
ensure a comparison of equal services. Itis staff's recommendation to utilize the services
of an expert in the field. This will provide the City with assurances that the bids received
by contractorsare complete and that each contractor is proposing equal services. A
description of the bid analysis/negotiation services being provided by SPACES is
attached for Council review.
MOVE TIMELINE
Originally, City staff anticipated moving into the new facility at the beginning of January
2001. However, as we become more involved in the planning effort, more
knowledgeable about the construction required and in order to comply' with state law
regarding the formal bid process for public projects, we realize that this timeline is
unrealistic. Since the construction of the tenant improvements is defined as a "Public
Project' we are required by law to proceed through a formal bid process and to comply
with the regulations related to the formal bid process.
State law requires all projects defined as "Public Projects" to comply with the Public
Contract Code. The Code defines a "Public Project" as a "project for the erection,
improvement, painting or repair of public buildings and works. " Any expenditure for a
public project that exceeds $5,000 must be contracted to the lowest responsible bidder.
This requires the City to proceed through the formal bid process and comply with all the
regulations outlined in the Public Contracts Code related' to advertising the project,
accepting bids, etc.
As a result of our requirement to comply with state law regarding public projects it is
necessary to re-evaluate our timeline for moving. Based on several factors including the
number of weeks necessary for construction as well as providing adequate time for
advertising the project and accepting bids (requirement of state law) we should consider
moving to the AQMD campus in early March. The delay moving to the AQMD facility
will not result in any increased relocation and/or construction costs.
Below is an outline of actions that have occurred, or need to occur, prior to the move of
the City Hall offices to the AQMD facility.
Distribute RFP for Space Planning Services
Select Space Planners
Develop initial block plan — adjacencies/dept locations
Develop detailed space plan
Lease Approval
2
Issued August I lth
Awarded September 5th
Completed September 26`h
Completed October 23rd
City Council Approved
October 17'h
A
Prelim Job Walk Completed October 27th
Preliminary Cost Estimates— budget purposes Received Thursday, Nov. 2nd
Preliminary Bid Analysis Nov 3rd — 6th
Final Construction Documents Developed Nov 6rh — Nov. 17th
Plans & Specifications approved by CC November 21"
Advertising and acceptance of bids November 22 - Dec 1"
Bids due Dec. Ist
Review/analysis of bids reference checks Dec. 4th — Dec. 8d'
Award of contract for demolition & construction December 19th
Mobilization Dec. 20'x' - 27h
Demolition & Removals Jan. 3rd —Jan 10'h
Construction Jan I& — Feb 28d'
Move March 2nd, 3rd, 4th
City staff will work with the architect and contractor to accelerate this schedule whenever
possible. However, since the City is making at least a ten -.year commitment to locate in
this space, we want to ensure that space adequately serves the needs of the community,
city council and city staff.
City staff is working with the AQMD staff to revise the lease agreement dates to reflect a
move date in March. Initial discussions with the AQMD staff have been very positive
and it not anticipated that there will be any issue with adjusting the lease dates as well
as the rental abatement period to reflect the move in March.
PREPARED BY
2.'a-4. 20yk
cct�
aC1¢p-ty l.ity /i .ay¢r
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND SPACES FOR
SPACE PLANNING AND DDEIGN SERVICES
SPACES will provide the following services to the City of Diamond Bar at a cost not to
exceed $4,000.
PHASE 6
SPACES shall assist Client in the preparation of bid packages and other supporting
documents to facilitate the solicitation of bids from contractors, interior furnishing
contractors, material suppliers and'equipment manufactures as follows:
6.1.1 SPACES will review the preliminary bids to be sure all items are complete.
_ 6.1.2 SPACES will submit to the client a spreadsheet of the construction bids, using
SPACES form, showing preliminary pricing and cost estimates
6.1.3 SPACES will prepare "Instruction to Bidders" package for unit price bidding and
furniture bidding
6.1.4 SPACES will issue construction bid documents to CLIENT for release to final
construction contractors and vendor bidding
6.1.5 SPACES will review the bids to be sure all items are complete.
6.1.6 SPACES will submit to Client a spreadsheet for construction only showing
pricing submitted by the three(3) lowest bidders with cost comparisons.
6.1.7 SPACES will convert existing hard copy "as -built" drawings to an auto -cad
format.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. `I.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members -of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November. 7, 2000
REPORT DATE: November 1, 2000
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Funding for Fiscal Year 2000-01
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar received approval of the City's application for funding under
the Bureau of Justice Assistance's (BJA) Fiscal Year 2000 LLEBG Program in the amount of $56,141
with the City obligated to match $6,238 for a total of $62,379. The purpose of the LLEBG Program
is to provide units of local government with funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve
public safety.
Captain Alexander R. Yim of the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station, recommends that the LLEBG
funds continue to be utilized for the Diamond Bar Special Problems Unit/High Impact Team Deputy.
In addition, an Advisory Board has reviewed the proposed use of funds and concurs with the
recommendation of Captain Yim.
Prior to the obligation of funds, a public hearing is required.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar open
public hearing, receive testimony, and approve the recommended use of funds as requested by the
Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
X Staff Report
X Public Hearing Notification
X Other: BJA Correspondence re: Application approval
Captain Yim Correspondence re: Recommended use
Advisory Board Review Acknowledgements "Forms
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed NA
by the City Attorney?
1 Does the report require a majority vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NA
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NA
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? NA
Report discussed with the following affected tlepartments:
Interim City Manager
000
David A. Doyle
Deputy City Manager
_ Yes No
x Yes No
Yes _ No
Yes No
Yes No
Teresa Arevalo
Senior Administrative Assistant
AGENDA NO.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant fLLEBG) Funding for Fiscal Year 00-01
t,
DATE: November 1, 2000
ISSUE STATEMENT
Should the City Council approve the recommended use of LLEBG funds for fiscal year 00-01 as
requested by the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station?
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar open public hearing, receive
testimony, and approve the recommended use of funds as requested by the Walnut/Diamond Bar
Sheriff's Station.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
For FY 00-01, the City of Diamond Bar's LLEBG Program total award, including the City's obligated.
match of $6,238, is $62,379. As in previous award years, the award amount will be used to partially
fund a Special Problems Unit Deputy. The annual rate:for this position is $100,815 (including 6%
liability insurance). The remaining costs ($44,674) will -be funded through the City's General Fund
as identified in the 00-01 budget. Therefore, no additional budget appropriation is required.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City received approval for its application for funding under the Bureau of Justice Assistance's
(BJA) Fiscal Year 2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program in the amount of $56,141 with
the City obligated to match $6,238. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to provide units of local
government with funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public safety.
On October 10, 2000, the City of Diamond Bar received correspondence from Captain Alexander R.
Yim of the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station. In his correspondence, Captain Yim recommends
that the LLEBG funds for fiscal year 00-01 continue to be utilized for the Diamond Bar Special
Problems Unit/High Impact Team Deputy. The Diamond Bar Special Problems Unit/High Impact
Team Deputy is responsible for a variety of law enforcement functions including lecturing at local
schools regarding gangs and narcotics, performing vehicle check points and surveillance, and
conducting search warrants.
LLEBG — Staff Report
Page 2
LLEBG recipients are required to establishor designate an Advisory Board that includes
representatives of groups with a recognized interest in criminal justice and crime/substance abuse
prevention and treatment. The Advisory Board reviews the application for funding under the LLEBG
Program and is authorized to make non-binding recommendations to the local unit of government for
the use of funds received under the program.
The Advisory Board for the City of Diamond Bar is comprised of the following individuals:
Local Law Enforcement Agency:
Bill Flannery, Walnut/Diamond Bar Station `
Local Prosecutor's Office:
Carol Najera, Assistant Head District Attorney
Local Court System:
Lieutenant ]Pete Fosselman, Court Liaison
Local Public School System:
Pam Lopez, Administrative Director/Pomona Unified School Dist,
Local Nonprofit Educational Group:
Mike Armijo, Sheriff's Booster Club President
On October 19, 2000, the Advisory Board met to review the proposed use of funds for FY 00-01.
Present at the meeting were Deputy City Manager- 'David Doyle, Finance Director Linda Magnuson,
Senior Administrative Assistant Teresa Arevalo,A
'ccountant Gina Tharani, Sergeant Bill Flannery,
Team Leader Deputy Diane Dodd, and Administrative Director Pam Lopez. Advisory Boardmembers
not present (Armijo, Fosselman and Najera) were sent information for their review and comment.
Included in this report are all Boardmembers' acknowledgement forms.
Prior to the obligation of funds, a public hearing is required.
The Sheriff's Department will be present to discuss their request.
Prepared by:
Teresa Arevato
Senior Administrative Assistant
Y
Captaiw— Yim::Garr esponden6e
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES'
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 2000'
FROM: ALEXANDER R. YIM, CAPTAIN TO: JAMES DeSTEFANO, I/CITY MANAGER
WALNUT REGIONAL STATION CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED USE OF LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT
{LLEBG}
It is our recommendation that the LLEBG funds this year be utilized to continue funding the deputy
Position assigned ig to the Diamond Bar Special Problems Unit / High Impact Team.'
That deputy position is responsible for a variety of functions, all directly related to local law
enforcement. Over the past year, as part of the Special Problems Unit, the deputy assigned has
preformed the same functions as in the past, plus has had added responsibilities. The deputies assigned
to the 'special problems unit have recently worked with the District Attorney's office in locating and
bringing to court uncooperative witnesses and victims, They have served subpoenas and done what is
usually considered DA Investigator's work. This has been done in complete cooperation with the DA's
office. He has given lectures at schools regarding ,gangs and narcotics and participated in several
vehicle check points. As a team, they have conducted surveillances of habitual criminals, written and
served search warrants and made numerous arrests. This unit is a proactive as well as reactive type
unit. While they constantly look for illegal activity, they also deal with any special problems that <may.
arise. They have responded to complaints of marijuana use in some areas, conducted traffic surveys in
residential areas, and assisted the District Attorney's office in coordinating victims response to court
subpoenas.
Therefore, as a team, this unit assists schools, District Attorneys, City Government, and all aspects of
Law Enforcement. Presently, they are formulating a plan to combat a graffiti problem in Diamond
Bar. They have implemented a'tracking system and data base which correlates times and locations, as
well as gang or tagger affiliation. This would be;a "Quality of Life" project which would help deter
crime as well as hopefully deter juveniles away from that type of behavior.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000
REPORT DATE: November 3, 2000
FROM: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: Inland Valley Humane Society and S.P.0-A. (NHS) Contract for Fiscal Year 00-01
SUMMARY: Since incorporation, the City of Diamond Bar has utilized Inland Valley Humane
Society for animal care and control services. 'Typically renewed on an annual basis, the latest
agreement commenced January 1, 1999 for an eighteen -month period expiring June 30, 2000.
On August 30, 2000, IVHS Executive Director William Harford submitted correspondence and a
proposed contract in the amount of $72,486, which represents a $7,242 increase over last year's
contract amount, ($65,244). Three options were provided including keeping the contract at its
current rate with the adoption of a new fee schedule.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar:
1. Approve the FY 00-01 contract for animal control services with NHS in the amount of
$65,244; and
2. Set a public hearing for December 5, 2000, to adopt a new fee schedule as recommended by
NHS.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: William C. Harford; Executive Director IVHS
REVIEWED BY:
f\. n /1
Interim City
David A. Doyle
Deputy City Manager ;
Teresa Arevalo
Senior Administrative Assistant
X Other: 'Agreement.
Proposed Fee Schedule
IVHS Correspondence - October
31, 2000
SUBMITTAL CHECKLISTa
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
Yes
No
by the City Attorney?
_
—
2.
Does the report require a majority vote?
x. Yes
No
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed? NA_
Yes
_
No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NA
Yes
_
No
5.
Are other departments affected by the report? NA .
_
Yes
No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
_
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: William C. Harford; Executive Director IVHS
REVIEWED BY:
f\. n /1
Interim City
David A. Doyle
Deputy City Manager ;
Teresa Arevalo
Senior Administrative Assistant
AGENDA NO.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: HonorableMayor and Members of the City uncil
FROM James DeStefano, Interim City Manag
SUBJECT: Inland Valley Humane Society and S.P.C.A. (IVHS) Contractual Services FY 00-01
ISSUE STATEMENT
Should the City Council approve the animal control services agreement as submitted by the IVHS in
the amount of $72,486 for FY 00-01 or approve the agreement at the current rate in the amount of
$65,244 which will require the adoption of anew fee schedule?
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar:
1. Approve the FY 00-01' contract for animal control services with IVHS in the amount ,of
$65,244; and
2. Set a public hearing for December 5, 2000, to adopt a new fee schedule as recommended by
NHS.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
If the City Council recommends the contract with adoption of a new fee schedule, then no
additional funding is necessary. However, if the agreement is approved in the amount of $72,486,,
then an appropriation of $7,242 from the general fund reserve balance is needed.
BACKGROUND
Since incorporation, the City of Diamond Bar has utilized Inland Valley Humane Society for animal
care and control services. Typically renewed on an annual basis, the latest agreement commenced
January 1, 1999 for an eighteen -month period expiring June 30, 2000. The terms of the agreement
state that "Unless either party gives notice of its intent to terminate this agreement at least ninety
(90) days prior to the expiration date of the agreement, this agreement shall automatically renew for
successive periods of twelve (12) months each until terminated by one of the parties."
On August 30, 2000, lVHS Executive Director William Harford submitted correspondence and a
proposed contract in the amount of $72,486, which represents :.a $7,242 increase over last year's
contract amount ($65,244). Three options were provided including keeping the contract at its
current rate with the adoption of a new fee schedule (attached).
NHS Staff Report
Page 2
DISCUSSION
The program cost includes personnel, field services, kennel service, administrative services,
canvassing, veterinarian services, and manpower overhead. The City contract cost and revenue
received for license and service fees such as impounding and vaccinations offset the program costs.
During canvassing years the program cost increases ;dueto the increase of personnel Canvassing
years require eight additional personnel during a three-month period. This is evident below when
comparing the program cost for FY 00-01 ($155;486), a non -canvassing year, to the program cost
for FY 99-00 ($188,739), a canvassing year.
Following are the three options for renewal and the breakdown of program costs, for a three-year
period, as well as, the proposed costs for FY 00-01 based on the proposed fee schedule.
Option One: a one-year contract with no increase to the current contract rate of $65,244, with the
adoption of a new fee schedule.
Option Two: a one-year contract with an increase of $7,242 for an annual rate of $72,486. With
this option there will be no change to the fee schedule.
Optionthree-year a three- ear contract with no increase to the contract rate. This option will require
the adoption of new fee schedule. The contract rate for the first year will be $65,244 with a CPI
provision for years two and three.
FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 Proposed 00-01
Program Cost $ 195,108 $ 135,475 $.188,739 $ 155,486
Revenue (135,598) 73,448) (123,495) 90,242)
City Cost $ 59,510 $ 62,027 $ 65,244 $ 65,244
There have been some concerns 2000, Mr. Harfordsubmitted correspondence addressinthe t services through IVHS. On October 12,
P g the concerns pertaining to canvassing,' the
proposed fee schedule, and retention of a veterinarian. Subsequent correspondence dated October
31, 2000 further addressed some of those same concerns (attached).
Mr. Harford . also met with City Staff to discuss ways to increase public awareness pertaining to
NHS services and activities. IVHS has agreed to provide regular presentations to the City Council.
In addition, IVHS will extend outreach through involvement in City functions such as the Annual
Birthday Celebration.
Following is further information regarding canvassing, services, contracting through Los Angeles
County, and impact of the proposed fee schedule.
Identification - Limited Law
Staff was directed by City Council to review Corporations Code Section 145020). This code.
section states that "Every humane officer shall, when making an arrest, exhibit and expose a
IVHS Staff Report
Page 3
suitable badge to be adopted by the corporation under this title of which he or she is a member
which shall bear its name and a`number." The City Attorney has opinioned that humane society
officers issuing citations are required to have (not wear) a badge. The badge is an enforcement
badge and is not just limited to a picture ID.
Los Angeles County was contacted regarding their canvassing identification procedures. Their
canvassers wear an identifiable uniform (green or blue) and identification badge. Canvassers with a
blue uniform signify a trainee and will only have picture identification. Canvassers with a green
uniform will have a badge including the picture identification.
IVHS understands that the badge may be intimidating and based on the interpretation of the code,
they have agreed to alter their canvassing methods. NHS will have their canvassers wear picture
identification. The badge will not be worn, but carried and available if asked to show another form
of identification. NHS will work closely with staff to ensure information is provided to residents
regarding their canvassing operations and to promote positive community interaction.
Services Offered through IVHS
Throughout the year, IVHS provides many services to Diamond Bar residents. These services
include on-site classes and ,tours, visits to schools and youth groups, and presentations to businesses
and community organizations. These services are provided at no cost to the groups. These services,
as well as other information are available on the IVHS website. The website, www.ivhsspca.org,
can also be accessed through a direct link on the City's website. NHS also utilizes local
publications for outreach on its services and to provide helpful pet information to Diamond Bar
residents. The local publications include the Windmill, Chamber of Commerce Newsletter, and the
Weekly News.
One of the newer services provided by IVHS includes an on-site veterinarian, which was retained in
1998. Prior to the veterinarian, IVHS processed 50 to 75 full refunds for adoptions per month.
With the veterinarian, their successful adoption rate has increased with only about 5 refunds per
month. Although Los Angeles County provides the same service, they do not allow full refunds on
adoptions. Instead, if an individual is not satisfied with their adoption, they are able to exchange it
for another pet.
Los Angeles County Animal Care & Control
Los Angeles County was contacted for a cost estimate to provide animal care and control services.
The estimated cost for the first year through LA County is $95,000. This cost is based on an IVHS
estimated first year program cost of $187,500 leas estimated revenue of $92,500. In the first year,
the County will require the City to offset the cost of anew field truck in the amount of $35,000.
The second year estimate cost is approximately $60,000. This is based on an estimated program
cost of $139,500 less estimated revenue of $79,000. The cost estimates for the first and second year
are based on the current level of licensing and the assumption that Los Angeles County is able to
back license and retain license compliance from current licensees.
If the City were to contract with Los Angeles County, the shelter that will serve Diamond Bar will
be at their Baldwin Park facility, which is approximately twelve (12) miles from Diamond Bar. The
current IVHS shelter serving Diamond Bar is approximately five miles away.
IVHS Staff Report
Page 4
Three cities were contacted regarding their general level of satisfaction/dissatisfaction of service
provided by Los Angeles County. All three cities, Covina, Walnut, and West Covina are generally
satisfied with the level of service provided by the County.
The City of Covina stated that they are very satisfied. with the service provided by Los Angeles
County and recently renewed their contract for -an additional five-year term. Prior to contracting
with the County, the City of Covina established its own Animal Control Service. The in-house
service became very costly due to personnel, equipment and vehicle repair costs. At it's June 21,
1994 City Council meeting, the City Council of the City of Covina directed staff to seek out costs of
other providers of animal control services. The contract was awarded to Los Angeles County. The
City of Covina stated that the County is very responsive and keeps -staff informed of problems. The
City does receive complaints, but they indicated that complaints from residents regarding animal
control service are down as compared to when the service was in-house.
The City of Walnut stated.that they are currently satisfied with the service they receive. However,
two years ago this was not the case. The City was not receivingadequate response and contact with
the Officers assigned to the area. Several conversations and meetings were held with the County.
They now have a good rapport with the individual assigned to Walnut, who makes frequent visits to
City Hall (at least two times per week) and airs information (primarily on adoption) on Walnut's
weekly cable show. The only drawback was that the Officer assigned to Walnut also services
Covina and West Covina, therefore, he/she is in the Walnut area two or three times per week. There
have been instances when the Officer was needed but unavailable.
The City of West Covina previously contracted with three agencies: San Gabriel Valley Humane
Society for shelter and patrol, Inland Valley Humane Society for shelter and after-hours services,
and Los Angeles County for all three facets of animal control. After an exhaustive RFP process in
1995, the City of -West Covina entered into a five-year control for animal control services with Los
Angeles County. At its October 17, 2000 meeting, the City of West Covina City Council renewed
the existing Animal Control contract with Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and
Control for a five-year term. The City of West Covina indicated that there have been complaints
from time to time; however, the number of complaints is not excessive based on the size of the City
and the type of service provided.
Impact of Fee Schedule
IVHS has requested the adoption of a revised fee schedule. The proposed fee schedule will result in
increases to dog licensing, food and care, and miscellaneous fees. A significant number of the fees,
including all impound fees will remain the same. There have been no changes to the fee schedule
since incorporation. In addition, NHS' desires to have all their contract cities with the same fee
schedule by the end of this fiscal year. Following is a comparison of revenues for FY 99-00 (a
canvassing year) with current fees and FY 00-01 (a non -canvassing year), which is based on that
include the proposed new fees. The fees that will increase under the proposed fee schedule are
highlighted:
IVHS Staff Report
Page 5
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001
(CANVASSING YEAR) (NON -CANVASSING YEAR)
# OF CURRENT REVENUE # OF PROPOSED REVENUE
REVENUE TYPE CASES FEE TOTAL CASES FEE TOTAL
Altered -1 year
Altered - 2 year
Senior Citizen Altered -1 year
Senior Citizen Altered- 2 year
Impound fee (dog)
1st offense
2nd offense _
3rd offense
Impound fee (cat)
Vaccinations
Rabies vaccinations
Quaranteen fees
Owner's release fees
Ambulance fees
3016
$10.00
$60,320.00
$240.00
6
2688
$26,880.00
67.5
$20.00
$1,350.00
83.5
.-.
$1;670.00
270
$5.00
$1,350.00
19.5
$10.00
$195.00
2627
121
$10.00
$26,270.00
400
$2,869.00
$10,000.00
$20.00
$3,000.00
$40.00
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001:
$60.00
$188,739.00
11
$5.00
$55.00
370
$7.00
$2,590.00
235
$5.00
$1,175.00
240.4
$5.00
$0.00
195.682
$22.00
$4,305.00
14
$20.001
$280.00
1700
$42,500.00
5
$90,242.00
$250.00
2240
$10.00
$22,400.00
45
$20.00
$900.00
75
$1,875.00
250
; $5.00
$1,250.00
15
$10.00
$150.00
400
$10,000.00
121
$3,000.00
$20.00
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001:
$40.00
$188,739.00
$60.00
$155,486.00
5
$5.00
$25.00
370
$7.00
$2,590.00
240.4
$5.00
$1,202.00
$65,244.00
$0.00
172.727
$22.00
$3,800.00
15
$20.00
$300.00
SUBTOTAL
$129,549.00
$90,242.00
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
$139.00
$0.00
RECEIVABLES
$6,193.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE
$123,495.00
$90,480.00
NET,COST ANALYSIS
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000:
FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001:
Program Cost
$188,739.00
Program Cost
$155,486.00
Revenue
($123,495.00)
Revenue
($90,242.00)
Net Cost
$65,244.00
Net Cost °
$65,244.00
IVES Staff Report
Page 6
The comparison shows that the proposed, fees will have a minimal impact to most revenue types
during a non-canvassing year. However, during canvassing years the greatest impact will be to
revenues for Late Application Fees and Licenses. This revenue type will increase to $25, a $15
increase from its current rate of $10, whereas other revenue types will increase from,$3 - $10.
CONCLUSION
Based on the proximity of the current shelter for Diamond Bar residents, the services provided, and
the minimal impact of the proposed fee schedule, it is recommended that the City continue to
receive animal care and control services through Inland Valley Humane Society.
If the recommended option, a one...-year contract with no increase to the current contract rate of
$65,244, with the adoption of a new fee scheduleAis, selected, then a public hearing will be required
to establish a new fee schedule. The public ; hearing process will also require adoption of a
resolution setting forth fees.
IVES has provided informational packets for City Council. In addition, Mr. Harford will be present
at the City Council meeting to answer any other questions or concerns that may arise.
List of attachments:
Agreement
Proposed Fee Schedule
IVES Correspondence- October 31, 2000
Prepared by:
Teresa Arevalo, Senior Administrative Assistant
Todd Strojny, Senior Administrative Assistant
Attachment
(Proposed Fee Schedule),
Inland Valley Humane Society & S__,P.C.A.
City of Diamond Bar
Proposed Fee Schedule
2000
Dog -License Fees
Unaltered - 1 Year
Current
Proposed
Unaltered - 2 Year
20.00
25.00
Altered ---1 Year
40.00
50.00
Altered --- 2 Year
10.00 .
no change
Senior Citizen Unaltered - 1: Year
20.00
no change
Senior Citizen Unaltered - 2 Year'40.00
20.00
25,00
Senior Citizen Altered - 1 Year
50.00 '
Senior Citizen Altered - 2 Year
5.00
no change,
Late Application Fee for New Dog License:
10.00
no change
Late Renewal of Dog License
10.00
25.00
10.00 '
25.00
lmnound Fees
Dog - Ist Offense
- 2nd Offense
20.00
no Change
3rd Offense
40.00
no change
Cat
60.00 `
no change
Small Animals.' - i.e. Rabbits, Chickens, Ducks, Turtles
5.00
5.00 `
no change
no change �.
Medium Animals - i.e. Goats, Sheep Calves,
- ,
Animals _:i.eHorses, Ponies, Donkeys, Cows, Pigs
15.00
25.00
no change
no change
(trailer needed)
Foo_ d_ 8z Care per day
Dog
Cat � ��
4.00
7.00
Biter Animals (dogs/cats)
3.00
7.00
Small Animals-
3.50
10.00
Medium Animals
2 Q0
5.00
Large Animals
4.00
7.00
5.00
ail biter animals quarantined at the shelter: food and care charged at a
10.00
higher rate.
Othe-- r Fees
Trailer Fee
Service Fee on Large Animals requiring
25.00
no change
extra man ower
Special Animal Permit p
50-00'
no change
Owner Release Fee50.00
- Per Animal
no change
- Per Litter
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
- Per on Site Pick-up - live animas
20.00
30.00 Fee for service
- Carcass removal - owners
20.00
no change
Justification: Extended period of time an owner's annul must be held at the shelter as per
oaivooep SB 1785 Hayden Bill - (three days)
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 REPORT DATE: October 31, 2000
FROM: James De Stefano, Interim City Manager
TITLE: APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER AND ONE ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE AND TWO
COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AND TWO ALTERNATES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
SUMMARY: On October 12, 2000 the cities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and Pomona along with the Department of Developmental
Services signed the Statement of Principles and Commitment related to the proposed severe behavioral program at Lanterman
Developmental Center. The Statement specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Committee is
to (a) assure a full and fair sharing of information and concerns among DDS and the localcommunities and their residents with respect
to the ongoing operation of the specialized behavioral program at LDC and (b) confirm on an ongoing basis that DDS/LDC are in
compliance with the terms and conditions to be set forth in this Agreement and other legal requirements relating to the specialized
behavioral program. The Committee shall consist of"... three (3) representatives from the City of Diamond Bar (2) of whom will be
residents who are not elected officials or employees of that City or Employees of Lanterman Developmental Center Committee..."
The first meeting of the State Advisory' Committee will be held on December 4, 2000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council appoint one (1) City Council representative and one (1) alternate and two (2) community
members and two (2) alternates to represent the City on the State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Community
Advisory Committee. The City's Lanterman Developmental Center 'Advisory Committee, at its meeting of October 30, 2000, '
recommended the selection of advisory committee Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell as the two at -large community representatives and City
Councilmember Carol Herrera as the City Council representative. The City Council will need to nominate and appoint alternates for
each of the three advisory committee seats.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X 'Staff Report Public Hearing Notification
Resolutions Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Ordinances
Agreements
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Sue Sisk & Darla Farrell
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No
by the City Attorney? n/a
2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Yes X No
Which Commission? Planning Commission
5. Are other' departments affected by the report? Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED'BY•
James DeStefano David Doyle
Interim City Manag, r Deputy City Manager
AGENDA No.
CITY OF DIAMOND,BAR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: James De Stefano, Interim City Manager
DATE: November 7, 2000
SUBJECT: Appointment of a City Council Representative and Alternate and Two
Community Representatives and Two Alternates to the Lanterman
Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION
The City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee recommends that the
City Council appoint Darla Farrell and Sue Sisk as the two non -elected community
representatives and Councilmember Herrera as the City Council representative to the
State of California Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee.
It is also recommended that the City Council appoint alternates for each of these seats.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no costs or financial implications associated with the appointment of the
members of the Lanterman Developmental Center Community Advisory Committee.
However, the City may incur additional costs through participation of community
members on the Committee.
BACKGROUND
In -January 1999 the State of California circulated a mitigated negative declaration related
to a proposed security expansion of Lanterman Developmental Center to accommodate
75 forensic clients and 53 severe behavioral clients. The State of California certified the
mitigated negative declaration and approved the expansion in February 1999.
Thereafter, the communities of Diamond Bar, Walnut and Pomona engaged in a very
contentious legal and political battle over placement of a forensic facility at Lanterman.
The legal and political effort resulted in the State rescinding its approval of a forensic
client project at Lanterman. Subsequently, the State proposed security modifications to
Lanterman which would accommodate 128 severe behavioral clients.
Prior to the approval of the security modifications by the Public Works Board, City
Councilmembers, local residents and representatives of the State of California
Department of Developmental Services (DDS) held a workshop to discuss the proposed
1
AGENDA No.
expansion of the Lanterman Developmental Center. The workshop produced a Statement
of Prinicples and Commitment. The _Statement set forth several provisions relative to the
manner in which a severe behavioral project would be processed, approved and
implemented. The Statement of Principles and Commitment was signed by all parties on
October 12, 2000.
DISCUSSION
The Statement specifies the creation of a Community Advisory Committee. The purpose
of the Committee is to (a) assure a full and fair sharing of information and concerns
among DDS and the local communities and their residents with respect to the ongoing'
operation of the specialized behavioral program at LDC and (b) confirm on an ongoing
basis that DDS/LDC are in compliance with the terms and conditions to be set forth in
this Agreement and other legal requirements relating to the specialized behavioral
program.
The Community. Advisory Committee will make recommendations to DDS/LDC
regarding the specialized behavioral program, which DDS/LDC shall consider in good
faith. The Community Advisory Committee will have 16 members, comprised of (2)
representatives from DDS, (3) representatives from the City of Diamond Bar (2) of whom
will be residents who are not elected officials or employees of that City or Employees of
Lanterman Developmental Center, (3) representatives from the City of Pomona (2) of
whom will be residents who are not elected officials or employees of that City or
Employees of Lanterman Developmental Center, (3) representatives from the City of
Walnut (1) of whom will be a resident that is not an elected officials or employees of that
Cit or Employees of Lanterman Developmental C
Cityp enters (2) client representatives from
Lanterman Developmental Center, (1) of whom shall be a client in the severe behavioral
program, and (2) representatives from the Parent Coordinating Council and (1) from the
Area Board 10 or from the Governor's Advisory Board:
The City's Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee, at its meeting of
October 30, 2000, recommended the selection of Sue Sisk and Darla Farrell as the two,
at -large community representatives and City Councilmember Carol Herrera as the City
Council representative to serve on the State of California Lanterman Developmental
Center Advisory Committee. Also, it is recommended that the City Council appoint
alternates for each of the three (3) representative seats on the State of California
Lanterman Developmental Center Advisory Committee. The appointment of both
representatives and alternates to the Committee requires City Council approval.
The first meeting of the State of California Lanterman Developmental` Center Advisory
Committee is scheduled for December 4, 2000.
Prepared by:
David A. Dayle
Deputy City Manager
2
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Huff called the meeting to order at 10:00 p.m.
in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Herrera, O'Connor, Vice
Chairman Chang and Chairman Huff.
Also present were James DeStefano, Interim City Manager; Mike Jenkins,
Agency Attorney; David Doyle, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Director of Public
Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director;
Mike Nelson, Communications and Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency
Secretary.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/O'Connor moved,,AM/Ansari seconded, to approve
Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS AnsIari, Herrera; O'Connor, VC/Chang,
Chair/Huff
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - None
3.1 APPROVED MINUTES - RegularMeeting of October 3, 2000 As submitted.
3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated October 17, 2000 in the amount
of $895.92:
3.3 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT - for August 2000.
4., PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: None Offered.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Chair/Huff adjourned the
meeting at 10:02 p.m.
LYNDA BURGESS', Agency Secretary
ATTEST:
Robert S. Huff, Chairman
DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT A:��E,dC=
RUN UP:TE= it/01 2000 37`• 2.31.
VOUCHER 'RMISTER
PROD ?
DUE TNFU * 11107/2000
REPAID! I REPAID!
Ft� ". / t+ nT PP,3 jEC ACCT
r��'siiJ SECT—�iii.ax . tavv+—�rT —3ivLt
P ,3}
i-� II
t '.s 14j CE ^Fnnn+. IO tr.'! it AI 7•y_,
11�i Lrliri-... Esc-wC. rii. �i�_ d �iliJ!_�iR� itr]3L
C'- L
Li3LCY,
DEWAN LITT, ITN ASSOCIATE'
701E
DB-A.15A`4 ISGII; S,f'CS-P-RtA CYNI RD
,426.50
61kGI100 1-6-1i1 R�'ir�8-0,6411
701
DIB 015A -S iD.•Sb sSStCS Rp-,EA CYN R.E�
c 4�5..0i1
1
TGTAj PREdAMS
.00
TM AIL VOUCHER 3
11 '903.50
IF, PIL DUE t:CNDO{5R
11,903.50
.GSt�xGN, j ,,,:,s'rCE;?.ES 3di4
c 3 {}Y11f, 44 CII),--
A9366
F.r� lVr-S-ECr, , Sr^Tr^
in
8,875.79
4-107110-44000—
A_3'sls
11 RRCt.SrL. * EL-U`s-1 ULI STRIM
e 75-
13Gr
10731i 44010
er66
4 CwJn -C' N DEV wTxG-4
PROF SVC
4,.07,68
TOTAL PREPAID[
'TOTAL VOL RS
Y.
t.;s`�f`}�:77
.LL
TOTAL DUE VEPIJOR
'27,0Sff.22
WARREN SI_D(E
9468
46071 IST! -5SES f H NDR P/CYN
4217. AF
5It.i7i1. 46412—R1300-16412
94L8
46l+' MGM —B/CY,4/LYCr.4�! s[,
427.50
'7y A b1R ptt-.4 4
J1 J.. 1 j ?rr'f1• F._'t r _ •J 1i
fSh S
�'x_
��+�VC
P, E f } 3
607 ,rJ�li v� ice+ -3 R!4Ux.�L `s=LE:'R:A
NR-
427.50
j
73'f =t 412—R-15
1.2 r c,{,-4 41-2
_1Vi 1-_ 6, .i .c1:J: "(
iso V
T�3J
jCJ��'HF (i�'P-'.'�D,
Nyj}
4.4li
' DIM,N 3 C9—i3/L-E1-R77G BALLENi
9
717 e��1
61071110-4641
9468
OS3tf vvC6—}./SG cd"uw/LEMI'D"d
427.50
6r4733!aLtS 41^ a+zl.r T64--
9468
4607 i'SG °SkCS L/ /ShnL T C^SV:G
427150
;CTP' PR'OPPAID�—
00
T�S+_�.:su
AL VO.s�x,6
�
i,5t5anE
TOT DUE VENDOR
}`11_
.. 27565.00
-
-
E
RER?RT T1?T_ RRE'IIPS
.00
TOTAL l
411,548.72
REPORT TCT _
41,543.72
r
DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: James DeStefano, Executive Director
MEETING DATE: November 07, 2000 REPORT DATE: October 31, 2000
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - September 30, 2000
SUMMARY;
Submitted for the Redevelopment Agency Board's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the
month of September 2000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification
Resolution(s) - Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk's office)
Ordinance(s) Other:
_ Agreement(s)
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes_ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote? _ Yes No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes _ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A Yes _ No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes — No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD:
James DeStefan DavidW Doyle Linda G. Magn s n
Executive Directof Deputy City Manager Finance Director
DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 07, 2000
T0: Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM James DeStefano, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement= September 30, 2000
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per Agency policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the
Redevelopment Agency Board's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the September 2000 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for the Board's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of
September 2000. This statement shows the cash balances for the Redevelopment Agency, with a
breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned
from investments:
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY C1PFD $1;213,197.96 $37,595.68 $4,342.50 $1,246,451.14
LOW & MOD INCOME HOUSING FD
REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SVC FD
TOTALS $1,213,197.96 $37,595.68 $4,342.50 $0.00 $1,246,451.14
SUMMARY OE CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT $167,588.83
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS $167,588.83
INVESTMENTS:
TIME CERTIFICATES 1,078,862.31
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 0.00
TOTAL INVESTMENTS $1,078,862.31
TOTAL CASH $1,246,451.14
Note: The Redevelopment Agency approved a development and disposition agreement with 'Triple T Diamond Gateway, LLC'
This agreement requires the Agency to invest $983,040.50 in a Time Certificate of Deposit. The agreement provides
than the developer guarantee the current LAIF investment yeild, The certificate of deposit has increased due to the interest
earned being reinvested into the account.
L.A.I.F Effective Yield for September 2000 6.502%
Certificate of Deposit Yield (05106/00-11/05/00) 5.500%
James DeStefano, Tre', surer