Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/04/2000
Tuesday, January 4, 2000 5:00 p.m. — Closed Session CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District Main Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mayor Debby O'Connor Mayor Pro Tem Eileen Ansari Council Member Wen Chang Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Huff City Manager Terrence L. Belanger City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Lynda Burgess Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO CONBESSION AND COMMITTEE Iv1EETINGS) PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member ofthe public may address the Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of interest which are within the subject matter jurisdiction ofthe Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in person to the City Clerk. As a general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion ofthe Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business ofthe Council. Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks towards Council Members or other citizens. Comments which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City Council and will not be tolerated Your cooperation is greatly appreciated In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public comment on items previously considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Corrunittee meetings.) In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Council meeting. In case of emergency, or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting ofthe agenda, upon making certain findings the Council may act on an item that is not on the posted agenda- CONDUCT gendaCONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect to a regular or special meeting ofthe Diamond Bar City Council. A. Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member ofthe staff thereof, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting. B. A breach ofthe peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting_ C. Disobedience of any lawful order of the Char, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from addressing the Board; and D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72 hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer through a phone modem Every meeting ofthe City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules ofthe Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Information (909) 860-2489 NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA. Next Resolution No. 00-01 Next Ordinance No. 0X(2000) 1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M. - CC -8 (a) Government Code Section 54957: City Manager Performance Evaluation (b) Conference with legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, Government Code Section 54954.5: Amrut Patel, et al., vs. City of Diamond Bar 2. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 6:30 p.m., January 4, 2000 Mayor Rex Wolins, Associate Pastor Diamond Canyon Christian Church Council Members Chang, Herrera Huff, Mayor Pro Tem Ansari, Mayor O'Connor Mayor 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Presentation of City Tile to Walnut Valley Unified School District Member Christine McPeak. 3.2 Presentation of City Tile to Mt. San Antonio Board of Trustee Members Barbara Booth and Dexter MacBride. 3.3 City Manager Reports and Recommendations 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. JANUARY 4, 2000 PAGE 2 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 HOLIDAY TREE RECYCLING - December 27, 1999 through January 15, 2000 - Recycling of Holiday trees through your disposal company. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - January 11, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - January 13, 2000 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - January 18, 2000 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 23, 1999 - Receive and file. Requested by: Planning Division 6.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated January 4, 2000 in the amount of $1,426,811.83. Requested by: Finance Division 6.3 ACCEPTANCE OF LORBEER MIDDLE SCHOOL BALL FIELD LIGHTING PROJECT - D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor was awarded a contract by the City Council to install the ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School. The lights have been installed and the work has been accepted by the Engineer of Record, Dream Electrical Engineering. The project is ready to be accepted by the City Council. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept the work completed by D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor on the installation of ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School and direct staff to file the Notice of Completion. Staff further recommends that the City Council direct staff to pay the loo retention of $17,295.13 to D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor 35 days after the Notice of Completion is filed.. Requested by: Community Services Division 6.4 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THREE MEDIANS ON GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE - Staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to seek a qualified consultant to design the landscaping JANUARY 4, 2000 PAGE 3 improvements for three medians on Golden Spgs. Dr. east of Diamond Bar Blvd. These medians are located at: Golden Spgs. (south side) at Torito Ln.; Golden Spgs. (north side) at El Encino; and Golden Spgs. (south side) at Ballena Dr. Five firms submitted proposals in response to the RFP. After a review of the proposals and interviews with the most responsive firms, staff has determined that Hirsch and Associates is the most qualified firm for this project. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract to Hirsch and Associates for the design of landscaping improvements for three medians on Golden Spgs. Dr. in an amount of $18,400, plus a contingency of $3,600 for reimbursables and soils analysis, for a total authorization not to exceed $22,000. It is further recommended that the City Council allocate $22,000 from LLAD #38 reserves for this project. Requested by: Community Services Division 6.5 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAILS AND BICYCLE ROUTES MASTER PLAN - The Parks Master Plan recommends the completion of a Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan. This plan will identify locations for trails and bicycle routes within the City and connectors to adjacent cities. It will also identify potential land acquisitions and easements needed to complete the trails system. The City Council has allocated $50,000 in the current fiscal year budget to complete this plan. Staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to seek a consultant to complete this work. A total of five proposals were received and the two firms that submitted the highest rated proposals were interviewed. Staff is recommending that a contract for this work be awarded to The Roth Group, which will use a public input process to complete the plan. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the completion of the Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan to the Roth Group in the amount of $48,500. Requested by: Planning Division 6.6 SECOND READING ORDINANCE NO. 14(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULATING WHEELED TOYS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY - To facilitate the safe use of pedestrian walkways on private property, there is a need to prohibit wheeled toys (rollerblades, JANUARY 4, 2000 PAGE 4 rollerskates, skateboards or any similar device). The utilization of wheeled toys on private property, where pedestrians are, creates conflict and an unsafe environment. The recommended Ordinance amends Chapter 10.28 of Title 10 of the D.B. Municipal Code to add new Sections 10.28.030, 10.28.040 and 10.28.050. These new Sections prohibit wheeled toys on any private property where a property owner elects to post a sign prohibiting rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity. On December 21, 1999, the City Council approved the first reading, by title only. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 14(1999) Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property. Requested by: City Manager 6.7 SECOND READING ORDINANCE NO. 9A(1989): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9(1989) ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL - City Council salaries were established at the time of incorporation pursuant to California Government Code Section 36'516. Compensation for City Council Members was established on May 2, 1989, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 9(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." First, Section 2 of the Ordinance needs to be amended to accurately reflect the City's population (58,300). Second, Section 3 needs to be amended in order to increase the compensation amount from $500.00 to $525.00 for City Council Members. Currently, Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9(1989) states that "Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of $500.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group." Since incorporation, the City Council Members' compensation has not been adjusted. On December 21, 1999, the City Council waived full reading and approved the first reading, by title only, of the Ordinance. With the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council Members' salary will be adjusted in December, 2001. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 9A(1989) amending Ordinance No. 9(1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council. JANUARY 4, 2000 PAGE 5 Requested by: City Manager 6.8 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF ADA IMPROVEMENTS AT SYCAMORE CANYON PARK - The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that public parks be constructed so that they are accessible to the disabled. When a park has already been constructed without access, the park must be re -constructed, or retro -fit, to accommodate the disabled. Staff released on R.F.P. to obtain a qualified firm to complete the A.D.A. Retro -Fit plan for Sycamore Canyon Park. Of the four proposals submitted, staff has determined that Hirsch and Associates is the most qualified firm for this contract. The City Council has allocated $20,000 in CDBG funds for this project. Total contract amount will be $25,000. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the design of the A.D.A. Retro -fit of Sycamore Canyon Park to Hirsch and Associates in the amount not to exceed $25,000. It is further recommended that the City Council allocate an additional $5,000 in CDBG funds for this project, for a total allocation of $25,000. Requested by: Community Services Division 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: "7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. None 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION - This report addresses the request of the City Council for staff to provide information on the pros and cons of a single service provider system within the framework of the recently enacted solid waste and recycling code modifications versus maintaining open permit system as currently employed. A description of the options, pros and cons of open market versus exclusive arrangements, analogous implementation schedules, and other information (e.g., rate impacts, diversion potential, environmental effects) needed by the Council to make a determination is included. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council review the attached report and provide direction to staff. Requested by: Engineering Division 9. NEW BUSINESS: None JANUARY 4, 2000 PAGE 6 RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Next Resolution No. RA 00-01 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Chang, C/Huff 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Agency Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Redevelopment Agency. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated January 4, 2000 in the amount of $27,868.68. Requested by: Finance Division 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: /fr TO: FROM ADD CESS: ORGA IZAT4eht: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: �r�,- Cl/• j� S >Y�fi s? PHONE: 9rqe/ ,T?(V '� G r I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. 4Signa VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK r rf FROM:/ I DATE: l (J U r ADDRESS: % r�r rx�xa�; yay-- PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: ��(J-1 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. 1 - f Signature TC FF DM: AC DRESS: OF GANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AC SNDA #/SUBJECT: ; WORA DATE: f h z!a 4o qyA G , ' — -7N0 qJ x"14, ki PHONE: 331; 3 6 3 expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. � nature . �Ir TO FR )M: AD )RE'SS: OR aANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AG :-N DA #/SUBJECT CITY CLERK DATE: PHONE: I exoect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. r---, r Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL 'TO --RC W ADID NESS: (DRj. ANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: ,,CITY CLERK to A, E DATE: S 1 PHONE: ltg) -fit L I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: �1 1 % JJ i C DATE: �- �' 00 ADDRESS: jd-� �00-;PHONE: ORGANIZATION: 1,n�i v� ��'s,��, Ci1/� Sc,SN c AGENDA #/SUBJECT: - I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. ignature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO CITY CLERK FRC 0: L` C �C �/e�SSE DATE: ato ADI] 117 -SS: "7�_ _ PHONE: OR ' 4NIZATION: AGF-14DA #/SUBJECT: rf I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 23,1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the Hearing Board Room of the South Coast Air Quality Management Headquarters Building, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner McManus. 1. 2. 3. 4 ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Steve Tye, Vice Chairman Steve Nelson, and Commissioners George Kuo, Joe McManus, and Joe Ruzicka. Also Present: Ann Lungu, Associate Planner, Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary, MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the November 9, 1999, meeting. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 9, 1999, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: 6. COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None NEW BUSINESS: None 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: None Kuo, Ruzicka, VC/Nelson, Chair/Tye None McManus None NOVEMBER 23, 1999 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 8. PUBLIC HEARING: 8.1 Development Review No. 99-6/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-3 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48 and 22.58) is a request to construct an office building (approximately 13,325 square feet) with a research laboratory facility for automobile emissions testing. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1575 Valley Vista Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Linda Czarkowski Specialty Equipment Marketing Association (SEMA) 1575 Valley Vista Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Dale Malcolm The Withee Malcolm Partnership, Architects 1983 West 190' Street, Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90504 DSA/Joe presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 99-6, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-3, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the Resolution. C/Ruzicka asked for assurance that the proposed type of operations is compatible with the area. Dale Malcolm, project architect and agent, stated that SEMA owns the building. They have completed negotiations for a long-term (10 year) lease to the Automobile Club of Southern California. He indicated that the flagpole is a design element and he will lower the height of the pole in accordance with staff's request. He explained the clean testing facility operation. The gases that are vented will be as clean or cleaner than the air that surrounds the building. He further stated that in his opinion, this is an appropriate location for this type of operation in that it is a research and development operation. There are ancillary functions the Automobile Club offers to people who have special problems with their cars. Individuals must have a pre - scheduled appointment to enlist the services of the facility. No repairs are allowed on-site. VC/Nelson said he is concerned about specialized facilities that sit empty and what the market statistics reveal about the demand for this type of facility. Dale Malcolm responded that SEMA has been planning this facility for about a year. One of SEMA's concerns was that if economic conditions did not sustain this type of operation, could the building be converted to an office building. SEMA's plan is that if anything happens in the future to render the facility useless, they will convert the bottom floor to offices. The ceiling is NOVEMBER 23, 1999 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION taller than it needs to be for aneffice facility, but the columns are in the right place to accommodate the conversion. Steve Mazer, Operations Manager for AAA, clarified that the proposed operation is not a government facility, -but a State of California and Federal Environmental Protection Agency approved facility. There are 22 test labs recognized by the State to perform the Federal Test Procedure which is a far more sophisticated emissions test than what is offered at local gas stations. This is a white lab coat and white glove type of testing envirorunent. The tests take a minimum of 24 hours to perform that requires careful preparation. Some clients are charged as much as $1,000 for a single test. The reason for the relationship with SEMA is that a number of their members need to perform this kind of testing in order to legally sell their after -market products in the United States and in California. He explained the testing process. He stated that they also hope to do contract testing for SCAQMD. Linda Czarkowski, Vice President of SEMA, responded to VC/Nelson that SEMA has not conducted a market study. Steve Mazer responded to Chair/Tye that of the remaining 21 test labs in California, one facility is operated by AAA. Chair/Tye opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Tye closed the public hearing. AssocP/Lungu stated that staff reviewed this project, considered the operation through the Negative Declaration process, through the filtration systems that have been developed for the emissions, and considered the use in relationship to Gateway Corporate Center. With its recommendation for approval, staff believes that this is an appropriate use for the location. This is a Conditional Use Permit. However, if the use was to stop for a particular period of time, SEMA may petition to turn the building into office space that is allowed in that zone. Following discussion, C/McManus moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Development Review No. 99-6 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-3, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, McManus, Ruzicka, VC/Nelson, Chair/Tye NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None NOVEMBER 23, 1999 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: tree plantings. 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: VC/Nelson complimented the City on the median 10.1 Public Hearing Dates for Future Projects - as listed within the packet. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the agenda. 12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Tye adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Attest: Stev e Chairman r", <— CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor O'Connor anddCCouncilmember Herrera FROM: Linda G. Magnuson inance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, January 4, 2000 DATE: December 29, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated January 4, 2000. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to its entry on the Consent Calendar. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAF; VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of voucher= dated January 04, 2000 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID VOUCHERS - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 121,980.40 C11,399,97 633,300.37 112 PROP A -- 'TRANSIT FUNI! .00 1 .,_!, , 1-.78.91---, 115 INTEGRATED WASTE MG'T- FUND 299-00•9.00 11:=, l ! ( 66) ATR t-I..TY Il`1F'R FL AB�:7382.64 .00 6,2S5..c'� 6,2S5.52 1:_C COM DEV BLK GRANT FUND .00 383.64 126 CITIZENS UPT-PUBLIC SFT'Y .,00 30.'22_{(_ .22 9 0.54 1 ?E: L #38' FUND .00 29,900.54 29,900.54 �9 139 -LAD LLAD #39 FUND .00 4,226.15 4,226.15 141 LLAD #41 FUND .00 2,205.74 2,205.74 '�5i � CAPITAL ]:1�1F'RO"J,'F'ROJ FUND .00 730,394.07 73i 94.07 730,394.S7 520 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT- FD 17,026.82 .00 17,026.82 REPORT FOR ALL FUNDS YYy1 � 1 ,28-7, S,04.6 1 , 4a_l_ , 811 . 8 -2 - 13 =9 ,�7 . -2 -4 APPROVED BY: I_..inda G. I`1 t. nuson Deborah H. O'Connor Finance Director Mayor Terrence L. Belanger--- elanger— Carol Herrera------- C;ity Manager Goc_nci lmember CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 1 DUE 7HRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK A-1 EgUIPMENT RENTALS 1255215-42130-- 137775"; TRUCK RNTL-FOOD GV -A -WY 42.32 1255215-42130-- 1377753 TRUCK RNTL-FOOD GV -A -WY 42.32 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 84.64 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 84.64 ADVANTAGE FORD 5204090-46100-- 9444 99 FORD TAURUS -C MGR 17,026.82 01/04/2000 3565E TOTAL PREPAIDS 17,026.82 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 17,026.82 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE 0014090-42140-- 9462 ANL RENT -STORAGE #371 1,342.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •U0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,342.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,342.00 AMERICANA ART CHINA CO 0014090-41400-- 17:334 CIT'r LOGO - MUGS 41.92 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 41.92 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 41.92 AT&T 0014415-42125-- CELL CHRGS-VLNTR PTRL 62.72 0014090-4125-- LONG DIST CHARGES 112.84 1264411-42125-- CELL CHRGS-SHERIFF 30.22 0014030-42125-- CELL CHRGS-C MGR 110.88 0014010-42125-- CELL CHRGS-C CNCL 65.73 0014090-42125-- CELL CHRGS-GENERAL 58.88 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 441.27 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 441.27 ATHENS SERVICES 0015510-45501-- 8971 OCT 99 STREET SWEEPING SVCS -OCT 8,214.16 TOTAL PREPAIDS .(K) TOTAL VOUCHERS 8,19.16 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 8,219.16 GLORIA BECERRA 001-23002-- 50180 REFUND SCRTY DEF -PETERSON 50.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR. 50.00 BILL'S LOCK. AND SAFE 2505:;10-46415-11298-46415 153762 PROF SVCS-B/FIELD LITES 30.51 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 30.51 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 30.51 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 2 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK: BLACK. LAB DESIGN COMPUTER EQ -SOFTWARE 25.00 0014095-462'3.5-- TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 25.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 25.00 BOSCACCI GRAPHICS 9398 1384 COMM REC GUIDE -DESIGN 800.00 0015350-44300-- TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 800.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 800.00 BOULEVARD BAGELS 0014090-42325-- 9134 1001 MTG SUPPLIES -12/10/99 25.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 25.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 25.00 CITY OF BREA 0015350-45300-- 64000010 SUPPLIES -ADULT REG 2°5.78 0015350-45300-- 3645000009 REC SVCS - NOV 99 43,911.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 44,206,78 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 44,206.78 BRYAN STIRRAT & ASSOCIATES INC 59.92 0015551-45223-- 922' 981895 PROF SVCS -INSPECTION TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 59.92 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 5`x•92 LYNDA BURGESS 0014090-42;;25-THCA-42325 REIMS-TRES HERMAN05 MTG 66.30 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 66.30 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 6E'•� C T PRINTING CC 0014095-4'2110-- 9'446, j/ 99-4241 PRNT SVCS-REC GUIDE -21000 J,302.OU TOTAL PREPAIDS •UO TOTAL VOUCHERS 3,302.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 3,3*21100 CALIFORNIANS OF SAN jUAN BATANGAS 001-2300''-- 50x209 REFUND SCRTY DEP-HERITAGE 200.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 200.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 200.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 0015310-42130-- 9036 150260116 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 14.52 RUN DATE: 12/29/1999 11:31:03 150260116 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 3 0015510-42130-- 150261460 DUE THRU: 01/0412000 17.00 0015310-42130-- 9036 150::62799 UNIFRM RNTL-WK12/13,12/20 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK, CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC TOTAL VOUCHERS 0015558-45509-- 4492 049-492 REMVL - TREE WELL COVERS 4,460.00 0015558-45508-- 9132 049-71-73 PROF SVCS -WD ABATEMT-NOV 4,55.08 1125553-45527-- 9132 049-71-73 PROF SVCS-B/STOP INSP-NOV 500.00 0015510-45502-- 8962 049-20 ROAD MAINT-OCT 31-NOV 13 5,325.18 0015510-45506-- 8963 049-20 MRKING&SGNING-10131-11113 1,149.77 0015558-45510-- 9132 049-71-73 PROF SVCS -TREE WTRNG-NOV 2,115.20 0015510-45522-- 8964 049-20 RGHT OF WAY - 10/31-11/13 403.97 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 21,479.20 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 21,4719.20 KITTY CHIM 001-34780-- 33294 RECREATION REFUND 22.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •C�(� TOTAL VOUCHERS 22.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 22.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 0015310-42130-- 9036 150260116 UNFRM RNTL-W:: 12/6 14.52 0015510-421"40-- 150260116 UNIFRM RNTL-Wt 12/6 PW 8.50 0015510-42130-- 150261460 UNFRM RNTL-WK12/13 PW 17.00 0015310-42130-- 9036 150::62799 UNIFRM RNTL-WK12/13,12/20 39.04 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 84.06 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 84.06 CITY OF SANTA ANA ni114r�40-42325-- RETIREMT RECEP-C/CLRK 15.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 15.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 15.00 CLU$NET INC 1185098-44000-- 9499 25465 ANN" RNWL - INTERNET SVCS 6,124.80 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 6,124.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 6,124.80 COFFEESMITH COMPANY 0014090-42130-- 8876 7081 WTR. COOLER LEASE -DEC 99 17.95 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 17.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 17.95 COMMUNITY INDUSTRIES 0015558-45521-- 9425 120199 LITTER ABATEMT-DCT & NOV 1,678.88 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,678.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR, 1;678.88 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/2811999 17:07:42 VAR REGISTER PAGE: 4 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO 4 INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK CONVERSE CONSULTANTS WEST 2505310-46415-1089$-46415 92210 334150 PROF SVCS-GEOTECH YAK. 1,680.62 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,680.62 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,680.62 COOPER DELIVERY SERVICE 0014090-42120-- 20892 DELVRY SVCS-CAFR RPT 40.00 TOTAL PP.EPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40.00 COPY CENTER 0015510-42110-- 9432 19992 PRNT SVC-NPDES TRNING MNL 912.01 TOTAL PREPAIDS 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 912.01 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 912.01 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RECORDER RECORDATION -EN 94-065 249.00U1/04/2000 35669 001-23012-- TOTAL PREPAIDS 249.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 249.00 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES 2505310-46415-1129C'•-46415 C7965 027793 PROF SVCS-LORBEER B/FIELD 7Q2.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 702.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 708.00 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER 0015350-42354-- 9503, 0107 PRNTNG SVC-KLL14NIUM FLYRS 855.61 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 255.61 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 355.61 DEANE HOMES SWIM CLUB 0014350-42140-- 8532 1283-85 REC FCLTY RNTL-SUM99 2,070.00 0015350-42140-- 9031 1803 REC FCLTY RN7L-SUM99 1,390.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 3,460.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 3,460.00 DEKRA-LITE 0014090-46250-- 9369 991521 PROF SVCS-BANNRS/HARDWARE 153.52 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 153.22 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 153.81 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12128/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 5 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0015510-45507-- 597' 151318 SGNL & LGHTING - OCT 99 2,766.73 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,766.73 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,766.73 DEWAN LUNDIN a ASSOCIATES 2505510-46411-12298-46411 944`i DB -0221-1 DESGN SVC -SAN LEANDRD PRJ 12,311.00 2505510-46411-122298-46411 9449 DE -0221-2 DSGN SVC -SAN LEANDRO PROD 12,755.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 25,066.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 25,066.00 DIAMOND BAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 0014090-42115-- 9104 1237/1224 CONSLTING SVCS-NOV 11000.00 PREPAID FUNDISECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK CAROL DENNIS 1,000.00 0014090-42115-- 991521 MEMBRSHP DUES-CNCL, CMGR 0014040-44000-- 9260 DBCC1123 PROF SVC-CC,RDA MTB -12/07 240.00 0015553-44000-- 9005 T&T1118 PROF SVC -T & T MTO 11/18 60.00 0014030-44000-- 9260 WCCA1201 PROF SVCS-WCCA MTG 12/01 60.00 TOTAL PP.EPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 360.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 360.00 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0015510-45507-- 597' 151318 SGNL & LGHTING - OCT 99 2,766.73 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,766.73 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,766.73 DEWAN LUNDIN a ASSOCIATES 2505510-46411-12298-46411 944`i DB -0221-1 DESGN SVC -SAN LEANDRD PRJ 12,311.00 2505510-46411-122298-46411 9449 DE -0221-2 DSGN SVC -SAN LEANDRO PROD 12,755.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 25,066.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 25,066.00 DIAMOND BAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 0014090-42115-- 9104 1237/1224 CONSLTING SVCS-NOV 11000.00 00140 95-45000-- 9104 1237/1224 COMM OUTREACH SVCS-NOV 675.00 0014090-45000-- 9104 1237/1224 FULL PAGE AD -VIEW 1,000.00 0014090-42115-- 991521 MEMBRSHP DUES-CNCL, CMGR 1,500.00 TOTAL PREPRIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 4,175.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 4,175.00 DIAMOND EAR INTERNATIONAL DELI 8c,77 6931: MTG SUPPLS-COUNCIL 1217 31.26 001409")-4 :3 5-- 8877 6934 MTG SUPPLS-LANTERMAN 12/7 37.71 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL 'VOUCHERS 68.97 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 68.97 DIAMOND PAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 001-13150-- ADVANCE TO RDA -01104/2000 357.50 01/04;2000 RDA0104 001-1:3150-- RDA ADVANCE TO RDA -011104/2000 27,511.113 01/04/2000 ROA0104 TOTAL PREPRIDS 27,568.68 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 27,865.65 DIGITAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 0?i4095-4623:'-- 17256 EDUIPMT-CAMERA 1,534.51 001-20710-- 172'a USE TAR -136.86 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,697.65 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,697.65 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 6 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 2505215-46420-13895-46420 9224 13258-2 PROF SVC-ECON ANALYSIS 13,860.00 2505215-46420-13892-46420 9224 13258-1 PROF SVC-ECON ANALYSIS 11,088.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 24,948•00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 24,948.00 EXCEL PAVING COMPANY 2505510-46411-13298-46411 915? 2 REHAB-GNU/TORITO LN -OCT 303,896.40 2505510-46411-13198-46411 9278ST REHAB/MEDIAN IMPRV PRJ 325,319.44 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 629,215.84 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 629,215.84 FEDERAL EXPRESS 0014090-42120-- 782043217 EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 64.32 0014090-42120-- 782018119 EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 38.89 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 103.21 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 103.21 FOOD SYSTEMS INC. 0014090-42325-- 01875 17808 MTG SUPPLS-CNCL 12/7/99 9.74 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 9.74 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 9.74 KELLEE FRITIAL 0014030-42330-- RE1MB-ICMA CONF 10/25-29 125.00 01/04/2000 35661 TOTAL PREPAIDS 125.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 125.00 GFB FRIEDRICH t ASSOCIATES INC 0015551-4522;-- 9347 9912-09 PROF SVCS -PLAN CHECK 760.26 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 760.26 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 760.25 GTE CALIFORNIA 0015=31-42125-- 909&61922: PH. SVCS - SIC CYN PAf,'1: 90.04 0015331-42125-- P1J9J56'O1':4 PH. SVCS-SYC CYN PARI: 34.74 11'`09-42125-- 9098605463 PH. SVCS - CITY ON LINE 160.72 TOTAL PREPAIDS ) TOTAL VOUCHERS 285.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 285.50 GTE LEASING 0014090-42'130-- 8842 2314:09 TELEPHONE EQ LEASE -JAN 466.79 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 466.79 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 466.79 ANNE HARAkSIN 0014415-41200-- kEIMB—SUPPLS—VLNTR PTRL 3E.76 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 38.76 TOTAL DUE VENDOR r,•76 HIGHPOIPdT 00149,,95-4'111-- 8927 66996 PREPF:SS SVCS—BUS CARDS 32.48 0014095-42111-- rJ?27 66997 PREPRSS SVCS—LETTERHEAD 8.66 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 41.14 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 41.14 NINO TA HSU TSENG 001-3478a-- 33315 4 RECREATION REFUND 33.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 3.3.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 33.00 v. MICHAEL HULS 0015510-44240-- 9156 S/WASTE,USED OIL SVC—NOV 1,240.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1+240.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,140.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAF; RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 7 DUE THRU: 01/04/20(* PREPAID FUND/SECT—ACCT—PROJECT—ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK ROBERT HALE 33954 RECREATION REFUND 54.00 001-34740-- TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 54.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 54•(K) HALL & FOREMAN 0015551-45223-- 9402 39624 PROF SVCS—INSPECTION 3,687.67 0015551-4522+-- 9259 39620 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 127.50 0015551-45223-- 00.579 39617 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 127.50 0015551-45223-- 9361 39629 PROF SVCS—FLAN CHECK 807.56 0015551-45223-- 9363 39630 PROF SVC—EROSION PLAN CK 127.50 0015510-45227-- 9281 39621 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 127.50 0015510-45227-- 9402 39624 PROF SVC—PLAN CHECK: 5,054.96 0015551-45223-- 9264 39619 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 127.50 0015551-45223-- 9362 39623 PROF SVCS — EROSION CNTRL 127.50 2505510-46411-13298-46411 9158 39614 PROF SVC—G/SPGS/GRND—TRTO 30,300.00 0015510-45227-- 9330 39620 PROF SVCS—INSPECTION 63.75 0015551-45223-- 9378 -39617 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 127.50 0015551-4522_-- 8211 39616 PROF SVCS — PLAN CHECK 131.25 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40,937.69 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40,937.69 ANNE HARAkSIN 0014415-41200-- kEIMB—SUPPLS—VLNTR PTRL 3E.76 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 38.76 TOTAL DUE VENDOR r,•76 HIGHPOIPdT 00149,,95-4'111-- 8927 66996 PREPF:SS SVCS—BUS CARDS 32.48 0014095-42111-- rJ?27 66997 PREPRSS SVCS—LETTERHEAD 8.66 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 41.14 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 41.14 NINO TA HSU TSENG 001-3478a-- 33315 4 RECREATION REFUND 33.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 3.3.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 33.00 v. MICHAEL HULS 0015510-44240-- 9156 S/WASTE,USED OIL SVC—NOV 1,240.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1+240.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,140.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 8 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION maw DATE CHECK INLAND EMPIRE STAGES 9457 120499 5EN10k EXCk5N-X-MAS I5 1,144.00 0015350-45310-- 9457 120499 SENIOR EXCRSN-TRANS 371.00 1125360-45310-- 9456 120899 SENIOR EXCRSN-PLM SPRING 1,892.00 0015350-45310-- 9456 120899 SENIOR EXCRSN-TRANSPRTN 457.00 1125360-45310-- TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .3,864.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 3,864.00 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY 4 �OQ-12UtN+ ANIMAL CNTRL SVCS -JAN 00 5,437.00 0014431-45403--88?8 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 5,437.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 5.437'00 INTERNATIONAL CNCL OF SHOPPING CTR5 MEMBRSHF DUES -D 0`CONNOR 50.00 0014010-42315-- MEMBRSHF DUES -W CHANG 50.00 0014010-42315-- TOTAL PREPAIDS .Ufa TOTAL VOUCHERS 100.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 100.00 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTIVE SVCS INC 8975 12057 CRSSNG GUARD SVCS-NOV 99 5,908.62 0014411-45410-- TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS -.00 .62 5,90862 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 5,908.62 KERMIT D FERGUSON INC 2505:310-46415-11298-46415 54451 11229`. PROF SVC-LORBEER BLL FLCi 510.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 510'00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 510.00 LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION 9370 12"�r� PROF SVCS -SKATE FARM. SRVY 1,605.00 2505310-46415-15500-46415 TOTAL PREPAICS TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,605.O00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,605.00 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CORP SOUTHWEST TICKETS 1,390.00 01/04/2000 35668 DU1409�?-4I;'30-- 9539 1,390'00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR, 1,390.00 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 02 87 r 4 84��./840. PRD, SVCS - EN 9,-255 .10.00 001-23012-- 848,2 °487 PROF SVCS - EN q9-254 /" 332.50 001-'301 - TOTAL PREPAIDS .OU TOTAL VOUCHERS 642.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 642.50 PAGE: 9 PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK 95.26 64.41 19.49 17.32 .00 196.48 196.48 1,440.00 .O0 1,440.00 1,440.00 1,63,-.40 .00 1,633.40 1,633.40 320,600.84 .00 320,600.84 Y-0,600.84 136.20 .00 136.20 136.20 1,527.55 .00 1,527.55 1,527.55 250.11 115.42 .O0 365.53 365.53 14.00 .00 14.00 14.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/29/1999 11:39:07 VOUCHER REGISTER DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION LEWIS ENGRAVING INC 0014090-42113-- 9052 35095 ENGRVIG SVCS - COUNCIL 0014090-42113-- 9052 35312 ENGRVNG SVCS -NAME BADGES 0014090-42ii3-- 9052 35234 ENGRVNG SVCS -NAME PLATES 0014090-42113-- 9052 35166 ENGRVN SVCS - PACHECO TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LIVINGSTON & MATTESICH 0014020-44021-- A8840 2220 LEGAL SVCS - LANTERMAN TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 0015510-45512-- C8614 SA000115 PROF SVCS -CATCH BASIN 98 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 0014411-45401-- 22311 CONTRACT SVCS-NOV 99 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LOS ANGELES TIMES 0014090-42320-- YEARLY SUBSCRPTN-12/99-00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LFA INC 2505215-46420-13298-46420 8445 11585 PROF SVCS -COMMUNITY SVCS TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR MAINTEX 0015314-41200-- 420311 MAINT SUPPLS-COMM CTRS 0015214-41200--9035 426903 CLEANING SPPLS-PARRS TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR DEBORAH O'CONNOR 0014010-42;,'30-- REIMB-LEAGUE CONF 12/2-3 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR PAGE: 9 PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK 95.26 64.41 19.49 17.32 .00 196.48 196.48 1,440.00 .O0 1,440.00 1,440.00 1,63,-.40 .00 1,633.40 1,633.40 320,600.84 .00 320,600.84 Y-0,600.84 136.20 .00 136.20 136.20 1,527.55 .00 1,527.55 1,527.55 250.11 115.42 .O0 365.53 365.53 14.00 .00 14.00 14.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 10 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO N INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK PACIFIC CREST YOUTH ARTS ORGANIZATN 001-23002-- 50223 REFUND SCRTY DEP-PANTERA 200.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 200.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 200.00 PACIFIC TIME RECORDER 0014040-42200-- 15735 REPAIR SVCS-TIME CLCK 49.50 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 49.50 TOTAL OLE VENDOR 49.50 P'AYR'OLL TRANSFER 001-10200-- PAYROLL TRANSFER-PP26 73,900.00 01/04/2000 PP26 TOTAL PREPAIDS 73,900.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 73,900.00 PENTAMATION ENTERPRISES INC 0014050-44030-- 9513 INC007632 FIN SYS SPPRT-2/1/00-1/01 7,384.65 0014090-42125-- 11-120800 DATA LINE CHRGS-NOV 99 17.:31 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 7,401.96 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7,401.96 PERIWINKLE ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTION 0015350-42.154-- 9515 MISC. ENTRTNMT-MILLEN CEL 1,600.00 0110412000 35665 TOTAL PREPAIDS 1,600.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,600.00 PERS RETIREMENT FUND 001-21109-- PP25 RETRO PAY 11.03 01/04/2000 35667 001-21109-- PP25 ' RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 4,506.27 01/04/2000 a667 001-21109-- PP25 RETIRE CONTRIB-ER 2,552.77 01/04/2000 35667 001-21109-- PP25 MILITARY BUY BACK 509.69 01/04/2000 35667 r301-21108-- PP25 SURVIVOR BENEFIT 33.48 01/04/2080 35667 TOTAL PREPAIDS 7,615.24 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7,615.24 PITNEY BOWES INC 0014090-42130-- 9000 3816188-DC99 EOUIPMT RNTL-DEC 99 369.90 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 369.90 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 369.90 PLAIN JANE EMBROIDERY 0015:350-42354-- 9517 JACKETS-MILLENNIUM COMMTT 675.42 01/04/2000 35664 TOTAL PREPAIDS 675.48 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 675.48 RADIOSHACK. 0014090-41200-- SUPPLIES - BAL DUE 1.24 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1.24 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.24 SANDHYA RAJPARA 001-24780-- 3355c" RECREATION REFUND 75.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 75.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 75.00 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY Ot-14rs9i-423�g-- 11742 SUPPLIES -HOLIDAY PRTY 43.30 0015::`0-41200-- 946.0 11717 SUPPLIES - TINY TOTS 50.57 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 93.87 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 93.87 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 11 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PRDJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK PLATINUM RESTAURANT EMPLY LUNCHEDN-12/17(99 343.40 01/04/2000 35662 0014090-42325-- TOTAL PREPAIDS 343.40 TOTAL VOUCHERS •00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 343.40 - POSTMASTER 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-026 23.50 01/04/2000 35663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-035 23.50 01/04/2000 35663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-048 23.50 01/04/2000 35663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-024 31.50 01/04/2000 x 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-051 11.75 01/04/2000 35663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-041 23.50 01/04/2000 3x663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 98-061 23.50 01/04/2000 35663 001-12,3010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 98-006 11.75 01/04/2000 35663 001-23010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-016 23.50 01/04/2000 35663 WI -2^010-- 917206 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-050 11.75 01/04/2000 3`,663 TOTAL PREPAIDS 207.75 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 207.75 PUkI'ISS ROSE-RSI 2505310-46415-15500-46415 9225 1702 PROF SVCS-SKATE PARK DSGN 8,225.85 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 8,225.85 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 81225.85 R & D BLUEPRINT 0014050-42110-- 9511 44669 BUDGET MANUALS-PRINTING 812.47 0015510-42110-- A8978 44644 PROF SVCS-PUB WS-PRTG 25.15 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 837.62 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 837.62 RADIOSHACK. 0014090-41200-- SUPPLIES - BAL DUE 1.24 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1.24 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.24 SANDHYA RAJPARA 001-24780-- 3355c" RECREATION REFUND 75.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 75.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 75.00 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY Ot-14rs9i-423�g-- 11742 SUPPLIES -HOLIDAY PRTY 43.30 0015::`0-41200-- 946.0 11717 SUPPLIES - TINY TOTS 50.57 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 93.87 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 93.87 CITY OF DIAMOND BAP. RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE.' 12 DUE THRU, 01/04/2000 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK. DEANNA RAMIREZ 001-34740-- 34082 RECREATION REFUND 59.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 59.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR, 59.00 REMEDY 0015310-44000-- 9459 278350/014 TEMP SVCS -WK 12/5,11/26 1,003.52 0015310-44000-- 9459 271312 TEMP SVCS-*,; 11/27 580.16 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,583.6E TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,583.68 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON 1255215-44000-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS-MINNEQUA-DCT 299.00 0014020-44021-- 900x1 104600 SPEC LEGAL SVCS-LANTERMAN 212.00 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -ADMIN ORD -OCT 1,456.00 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -OCT 38.45 0014020-44020-- PD 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -OCT 2,929.51 1155515-44000-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -SOLID WST-OCT 299.00 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -DCT 104.00 0014020-4402.0-- PD 9010 LEGAL SVCS -COM DEV -DCT 563.50 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -OCT 533.00 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -DCT 65.00 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -OCT 189.20 0014020-44020-- PO 9010 LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL -DCT 91.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 6,779.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 6,779.66 ROBBINS PRECAST INC. 112«<? -46420-- 93 4144 REPLACEMENT -BUS BENCHES 1,350.96 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,350.96 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,350.96 BRIAN ROBERTS 0014090-44000-- 8881 A/V SVCS -COUNCIL 12/7/99 210.00 JV•J TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 210.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 210.00 SCESA 001444042315-- 99-RENEW194 MEMBRSHP - RENEWAL 50.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 SIGN DEPOT 0015350-42354-- 9481 1085.; BANNERS -MILLENNIUM CELEB 1,091.16 0015350-42354-- 9435 10858 BANNERS -MILLENNIUM CELEB 727.44 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,318.60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,818.60 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 13 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT SMART & FINAL 0014090 -41200 -- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (015510-4212,_-- 0015319-42126-- 0015325-42126-- 0015510-42126-- 1385538-42126-- 1395539-42126-- 0015331-42126-- 0015313-421'26-- 0015314-42126-- 1415541-421'26-- 13°5538-42126-- 0015318-421'26-- 0015316-4'2126-- 00153«-42126-- 0015311-42126-- 0015510-42126-- 0015328-42126-- SOUTHLAND BAND 0015350-42354-- SUB6AY 0014090 -420125 -- 0014090 -4220 -- THE WEEKLY NEWS 0015350 -42354 -- THE WORLD OF FANTASY 0015150-42354-- PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK. 603042194 MTG SPPLS-CNCL 12/7/99 20.53 TOTAL PREPAIDS •I0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 20.53 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 20.53 ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 4,860.44 ELECT SVCS -PETERSON 1,850.79 ELECT SVCS-STARSHINE 12.64 ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTRL 151.77 ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 345.35 ELECT SVCS -DIST 39 228.65 ELECT SVCS-SYC CYN PK 353.$2 ELECT SVCS-HRTG PK 395.83 ELECT SVCS-HRTG CDM CTR 765.91 ELECT SVCS -DIST 41 155.74 ELECT SVCS -DIST. 38 14.38 ELECT SVCS-PANTERA 1,278.89 ELECT SVCS -MAPLE HILL 330.47 ELECT SVCS -R REAGAN 638.90 ELECT SVCS -PAUL GROW 45.96 ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTRL 162.44 ELECT SVCS-SUMMITRDGE 66.31 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 11,658.29 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 11,658.29 9491 PERFRMNC-MILLENNIUM CELEB 2,700.O0 01/04/2000 35670 TOTAL FREPAIDS 2,700.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS ,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,100.00 8883 MTG SUPPLS-LANTERMAN 9.98 8883 MTG SPPLS-CNCL 12/7 37.91 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHER'S 47.89 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 47.89 645 FLYERS -MILLENNIUM CELEB 280.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 28{x.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 280.00 9516 DECORTNE-MILLENNIUM CELED 4,300.00 01/04/2000 35666 TOTAL PREPAIDS 47300.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 4,-30Q.00 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1385538-45500-- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MNTHLY MAINT-DIST 38 -GEC RUN DATE. 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 14 MNTHLY MAINT-SYC CYN -DEC DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 0015311-45300-- FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-HERITGE-DEC 0015510-41250-- A9431 147137 SUPPLS-TRAFFIC SIGNS 51.18 MNTHLY MAINT-PANTERA-DEC TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 113700 TOTAL VOUCHERS 51.18 1395539-45500-- TOTAL DUE VENDOR 51.18 TRI -COUNTY OFFICIALS INC 0015322-45300-- 113700 0015350-44300-- 3774 REC SOFTBLL-OFFICIATING 220.00 113700 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 0015'12'-45300-- TOTAL VOUCHERS 220.00 ' 2 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 220,00 TRINITY SOUND CO. ,050.52 708.10 ?01`'19-45::00-- 0015350-42354-- 4438 1299583 SOUND SYS -MILLENNIUM CELE 4,000.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 4,000.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 4,000.00 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1385538-45500-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-DIST 38 -GEC 3,40.5.00 0015331-45.100-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-SYC CYN -DEC 708.10 0015311-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-P GROW -DEC 885.13 001531::-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-HERITGE-DEC 601.89 0015318-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-PANTERA-DEC 2,563.51 1415.541-45500-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-DIST 41 -DEC 2,050.00 1395539-45500-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-DIST 39 -DEC 3,997.50 0015322-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-R/REAGN-DEG 1,038.58 0015325-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-STRSHNE-UEC 354.10 0015'12'-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-SUMMTRD-DEC ' 2 0015316-45300-- 113700 MNTHLY MAINT-M%HILL -DEC ,050.52 708.10 ?01`'19-45::00-- 11_700 MNTHLY MAINT-PETERSN-DEC 1,490.74 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 19,933.17 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 19,9,3.17 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 0014090-4210-- 14082820 REPLENISH PSTG METER 1,000.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,000.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,000.00 VISION SERVICE PLAN 001-21107-- DEC DEC -VISION PREMIUMS 1,005.85 01/04/2000 35643 TOTAL PREPAIDS 1,005.85 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,005,35 WALLACE INCORPORATED 0015350-412'00-- K75317-0101 PRNTING SVCS -REG RECEIPT 244.70 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,40 TOTAL VOUCHERS 244.70 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 244.70 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. RLN DATE: 12/28/1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE, 15 DUE THRU: 01/04/2000 FUND/SECT—ACCT—PROJECT—ACCT WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 0015316-42126-- 0015325-42126-- 0015558-45508-- 001 219 -42126 -- 0015328 -42126 -- 0015221 -42126 -- 1385538 -42126 -- 0015313 -42126 -- 0015322 -42126 -- 0015313 -4212E - WARREN SIEC11 2505510-46412-14599-46412 2505510-46412-14299-46412 25055101-46412-14499-46412 25(;510-4641'2-14299-45412 2505510-46412-14599-46412 2505510-46412-14$99-46412 2505510-46412-1449'4-46412 2505510-46412-1449,'-4641' 2505510-46412-14299-45412 2505510)-4641-14599-46412 WEST COAST ARBORICTS TNP - 1555 j 5cr __)V- 0 () 155 5 53- 4 5 5 V-'- - 138 _)0()15553-455V-'-- sa 538 0- , `5r r -455 1J0•J_�•3� 00-- 0015558-45509-- WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES 0015350-42340-- PAUL 01`350 - PAUL WRIGHT 0014090-44000-- f)(1114090-44000-- PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION STNDBY CHRG-M/HILL 99/00 STNDBY CHRG-STRSHNE 99/00 WATER SVCS-TP.EES-NOV STNDBY CHRG-PETERSN 99/00 STNDBY CHRG-SMMTRDG 99/00 STNDBY CHRG-SYC GYN 99/(K) WATER SVCS -DIST 38-NOV STNDBY CHRG-HERITGE 99/00 STNDBY CHRG-R/REAGN 99/00 STNDBY CHRG-PANTERA 99/00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR 9277 4427 TRFFC SGNL-G/SPGS/RAPIDVW 9277 4427 TRFFC SGNL-B/CYN/S BULLET 9277 442, TRFFC SGNL-LEMON/LYCOMING 4425 TRFFC SGNL-B/CYN/S/BULLET 4425 TRFFC SGNL-G/SPGS/RAPIDVW 44.29 TRFFC SGNL-D/B BL/RTE 57 4429 TRFFC SGNL-LEMON/LYCOMING 4425 TRFFC SGNL-LEMON/LYCDMING 4429 TRFFC SGNL-B/CYN/S/BULLET 442;"• TRFFC SGNL-G/SPGS/RAPIDVW TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR PO 902b CRECI? - TREE STOCK PO 4026 PROF SVC -TREE REMVL 9289, 16746 PROF SVC -TREE MAINT 11/15 9238 16321 PROF SVC -TREE MAINT-NOV 15745 PROF SVC-TRMM,RMVL,CREW TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR WRtK5HP-CREWS,R0A,S0M0GYI TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR 8882 A/V SVC-CNCL MTG12%21,DUP '!82 A/V SVCS- 122/7/99 TOTA''_ PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR AMOUNT 318.08 92.40 115.00 921.76 1,460.96 2,834.16 595.81 188.72 362.32 1,'.,.';4.48 .00 5,22 .71 11,223.71 2,000.00 2,OOU.00 2, 0i a0.00 40.50 40.50 114.00 114.00 40.50 114.00 114.00 .00 6,577.50 6,577.50 -3,900.00 1,790.00 875.00 4,585.00 2,619.00 .00 31,969.00 31,969.00 45.00 .00 45.00 45.00 385.00 175.00 .00 560.00 560. GO PREPAID DATE CHECK REPORT TOTAL PREPAIDS 139,007.22 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,287,804.61 REPORT TOTAL 1,426,811.8 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR fV MATE: 12(28(1999 17:07:42 VOUCHER REGISTER : 16 mr .1mu: of /(4Wo6b PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO N INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK XEROX CORPORATION 8871A 072071974 MAINT CHRGS-COPIER 337.07 0014090-42200-- 0014090-41200-- 9453' 170884020 SUPPLS-STAPLE CARTRDG 7 153. 22 0014090-42100-- 8871A 072071974 SUPPLIES -COPIER CHARGES 931.16 TOTAL PREPAIEG .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,421.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,421.95 JAKE YOON 50226 REFUND SCRTY DEP-SUMMTRDC 50.00 001-23002-- TOTAL PREPAIDS '00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50'00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 YOSEMITE WATERS 0015314-41200-- A9152 NOV05?292 EQUIP RNTL-DEC 99 q 1:.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 19'00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 19.00 REPORT TOTAL PREPAIDS 139,007.22 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,287,804.61 REPORT TOTAL 1,426,811.8 CITV OG DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 28, 1999 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Acceptance of Lorbeer Middle School Ball Field Lighting Project SUMMARY: D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor was awarded a contract by the City Council to install the ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School. The lights have been installed and the work has been accepted by the Engineer of Record, Dream Electrical Engineering. The project is ready to be accepted by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the work completed by D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor on the installation of ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School and direct staff to file the Notice of Completion. Staff further recommends that the City Council direct staff to pay the 10% retention of $17,295.13 to D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor 35 days after the Notice of Completion is filed. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) _ Ordinance(s) X Other: Notice of completion: change order _ Agreement(s) #1, Notice of Acceptance from Engineer of Record EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Public Works REWWED BY: DE T EAD: Terrence L. Belan a James DeStefano Bd\b4ode City Manager Deputy City Manager Community Services Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Acceptance of Lorbeer Middle School Ball Field Lighting Project ISSUE STATEMENT Shall the City Council accept the work performed by D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor on the installation of ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School? RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council accept the work completed by D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor on the installation of ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School and direct staff to file the Notice of Completion. Staff further recommends that the City Council direct staff to pay the 10% retention of $17,295.13 to D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor 35 days after the Notice of Completion is filed. FINANCIAL SUMMARY There is $220,000 budgeted in the 1999/2000 FY budget for the installation of the ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School. Total cost for the contractor is $172,951.30, well within the budget allocation. BACKGROUND On July 6, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract to D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor to install the ball field lights at Lorbeer Middle School. The work was substantially completed on October 18, with only minor corrective work needed that was identified in the final walk through. That corrective work has now been completed and the project is ready to be accepted. DISCUSSION The contract that was awarded to D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor was for $163,437. A 10% contingency amount of $16,340 was approved by the City Council resulting in a total contract authorization of $179,777. There was one change order for this project in the amount of $9,514.30. This change order resulted from ground water that was encountered when drilling for the placement of the footing. The ground water forced a re -design of the footing, which resulted in additional material and labor costs for the contractor. The additional costs totaled $9,514.30 raising the total cost of the contract with D & J Foothill Electrical Contractor to $172,951.30. Acceptance of this work has been recommended by the Engineer of Record, Joe Nolan, of Dream Electrical Engineering. U8E Qr B kLL I'TLIS LIQI IM Staff has met with officials from Pomona Unified School District regarding the allocation of use of the new ball field lights. It is expected that the City of Diamond Bar will be scheduling the use of the lighted fields. A formal agreement to that effect will be forthcoming after discussions with the school district are completed. PREPARED BY: Bob Rose Director of Community Services 'T L - Engineering Incorporated Consulting Electrical Engineers 19031 Hipinsay 1R Ste 200 48880 Desert Flower .Apple Palley, CA 92307 Polm Desert, CA 92260 Phone, (760) 242-3369 Phone: (760) 773-4478 Fax: (760)242-1092 Fox: (760)242-1092 dreamjoea.:cwbergW.com dreasnjaoi aolcom MEMO Date: To:. Mr. Bob Rose - Director Community Svcs: From: JOE NOLAN Engineer in Charge Tuesday, October 26, 1999 Subject: Lorbeer Middle School Soccer Field Lighting - Further my previous Final Acceptance Memo of November 4, 1999. Electrical loads have been balanced. Job is closed. Bev Pinkerton from my office will file the DSA paperwork THE END cc Mr. Bernard Echanow Pomona Unified School Dutnct Ms. Kim Rhodes - David Evans hn. Ali Hekrnat. M. S.. P.E. Plan Check Eng Mr. Wade Clark IOR Mr. Dave Lammons - Foothill Director Lorbeer Middle School Soccer Field Lighting Second Final Acceptance Page 1 i .:l(`t1AdT:ATT (:70?1(_M1 (tnstn(rtions on reverse side) PAGE I— of 3 1'MRSS OWNER: City Of Diamond Bar PROJECT: Installation of Ballfield APPLICATION NO.: FINAL Distrinution to: 21660 E. Copley Dr—Suite 100 Lighting at Lorbeer Middle PERIOD TO: 11_22_99 ❑ OWNER Bar, CA. 91765 School. PROJECT NO5.:9810102 ❑ CONSTRUCTION Diamond MANAGER IVT-"ANIr.FS by Channe Orderl CONTRACT DATE: 7_14_99 ❑ ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR: OM CON D & J Foothill Electrical Conti. Inc. ❑ CONTRACTOR 2451 First Street VIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: Dream Engineering, Inc. La Verne, CA. 91750 VIA ARCHITECT: David Evans & Associates TNTRACT FOR: construction The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractors knowledge, Infor- ONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed been by the in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have paid ,plication is made for payment as shown below, in connection p ' P Y with the Contract. pay - Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and pay- mtinuatlon Sheet, AIA Document G703, Is attached. mcnts receiv d from the Owner, and hat current payment shown herein Is now due. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ................. . f 163 437.00 CONTRACT Net Change By Change Orders ............... S 9,514.30 u Date: 11--22-99 By: CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line t t 2) ........ 117295130 State of: �'� er/ C� vi d GORDON M. ANDERSON SR. TOTAL COMPLETED &STORED TO DATE ...... I 172 951 , 30 9 County of: s /4k� Commasion k 1231313 r oe%° z -� '` Notary Public - California (Column G on G702) Subscribed and sworn to before , Los Angeles County RETAINAGE: me this A.2 day of Aldu /P4r My Comm. "PiresSep2,2DD.9 a 10% of Completed Work E 17,295.13 (Columns D + E on G703) Notary Publi . IH, b. % of Stored Material f My commission expires: 4/2 / �G's (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Line Sa + 5b or I 17 295.13 eFRTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Total in Column l of G703) .. ' .... • - - . . TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE............I 155,656.17 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT 155,656.17 (Linc 6 from prior Certificate) ................. f CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..................I I 17,295.13 BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE 0 (Line 3 less Line 6) I HANGE ORDER SUMMARY I AuuffjONS DEDUCTIONS Dial changes approved in revious months by Owner 9,514.30 btal_a_pproved this Month TOTALS1 9,514.30 I IVT-"ANIr.FS by Channe Orderl Q RTA "10 In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising this application, the Construction Manager and Architect certify to the Owner that to the best of their knowledge, Information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED.............................:.I (Attach explanation if amount certified differs fmm The amount applied for. Initial ali figures on this Application and on the Continuation Sheet that changed to conform to the amount certified.) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: By: ARCHITECT: Date: By: Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Con- tractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT GMMMs • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERd,DVISER EDITION 1992 EDITION • AIA- • ©1991 • TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECIti, 1755 NEW YORK AVENUE. N.W., WASHINGTON' G702ICMe-1992 nc 2fRRV 5292 • WARNING: Unneensed photocopying violates US. copyright laws urd will subject the violator to legal prosecution. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO (""City of Diamond Bar i Sueet21660 E. Copley Dr. , Suite 1 0 Ad;reDiamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 City a State L J NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that I. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the properly hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar 3 The full address of the owcer is 21.6_6.0E _ Cnn 1 av Tlr 4 — c„ 4 +o 1 n n 4 The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is: In tee (If ot�er tnan lee, s!nhe "In fee" and insert, for "ample, "purchaser under contract c` ;urchase," or "lessee') 5 The full names and full adcresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6 A work cf Improvement on the property hereinaller described was completed on December 28, 1991tfe work done was: .Construction of Ball Field Lights on the Football field at Lorbeer 7. Ir'e—rl3rlfeloeithe ccnl0cto 'if any, for such work of improvement was _D F ,T Foot -hi 11 Flactrir contractors July 6, 1999 III no contractor for wort of improvement as a whole, insert "none'.) (Date of Unlnct) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Diamond Bar County of Los Angeles . State of California. and is described as follows: Lorbeer Middle School, of the Pomona Unified School District 9. The streei address of said property Is 501 S _ Diamond Bar Boulevard (If no street address has been officially assire;, insert "none".] Dated: December 28 1999 Verification fer Ind,v, dual Dwne, Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner named in parasrioh 2 or his agent I, the undersigned, say: tam the Project Manager the declarant of the foregoing ("President of "Manager of", "A partner of", "Owner of", etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DecemhPr 28 19 99 at Diamond Bar California. (Dale of signature.) (City where signed) (Personal signature of the individ:al who is swearing that the contents of the notice of completion are true.) NOTICE OF COMPL[TION—WOLCCTTS ICBM I tl<—ncv 6Q1 101-61117) 8 pt, type or larger CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 28, 1999 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Award of Contract for the Design of Landscaping Improvements for Three Medians on Golden Springs Drive SUMMARY: Staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to seek a qualified consultant to design the landscaping improvements for three medians on Golden Springs Drive east of Diamond Bar Blvd. These medians are located at: • Golden Springs (south side) at Torito Lane • Golden Springs (north side) at EI Encino • Golden Springs (south side) at Ballena Drive Five firms submitted proposals in response to the RFP. After a review of the proposals and interviews with the most responsive firms, staff has determined that Hirsch and Associates is the most qualified firm for this project. RECOMMENDATION ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract to Hirsch and Associates for the design of landscaping improvements for three medians on Golden Springs Drive in an amount of $18,400, plus a contingency of $3,600 for reimbursables and soils analysis, for a total authorization not to exceed $22,000. It is further recommended that the City Council allocate $22,000 from L.L.M.D. #38 reserves for this project. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) X Other: Request for Proposals, Proposal X Agreement(s) submitted by Hirsch and Associates EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? _Yes X No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Public Works REVIEWED BY: DERIT tN NT EAD: C f Terrerice L. Belan a James DeStefano se City Manager Deputy City Manager Community Services Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Design of Landscaping Improvements for Three Medians on Golden Springs Drive east of Diamond Bar Boulevard ISSUE STATEMENT This contract will result in the design of landscaping improvements for three medians on Golden Springs Drive. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a contract to Hirsch and Associates for the design of landscaping improvements for three medians on Golden Springs Drive in an amount of $18,400, plus a contingency of $3,600 for reimbursables and soils analysis, for a total authorization not to exceed $22,000. It is further recommended that the City Council allocate $22,000 from L.L.M.D. #38 reserves for this project. FINANCIAL SUMMARY There are no funds currently budgeted for this project. It is eligible for L.L.M.D. #38 funding. District #38 funds are available for this project due to alternative funding sources utilized for other District #38 CIP projects during the 1999/2000 fiscal year. BACKGROUND During the study sessions for the 1999/2000 Fiscal Year budget, the City Council requested that staff have landscape improvements constructed on three medians on Golden Springs Drive, if funding was available. District #38 funds originally allocated for the Golden Springs/Lemon Avenue improvements are now available for this project. Proposition C funds have replaced the District #38 funds for the Golden Springs/Lemon Avenue improvement project. DISCUSSION There are three medians on Golden Springs Drive east of Diamond Bar Boulevard, that are scheduled for landscaping improvements under this contract. They include: • South side of Golden Springs Drive at Torito Lane • North side of Golden Springs Drive at EI Encino • South side of Golden Springs at Ballena Drive The design of these medians will include a public input process from the residents, businesses and schools in the area . PREPARED BY: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of January 4, 2000 and between the City of Diamond Bar, a municipal corporation ("City") and Hirsch and Associates , ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide consulting services to City, as set forth in Exhibit "A", the City's Request for Proposals dated November 221999. B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "B", the Consultant's Response, dated November 23 , 1999 to the City's Request for Proposals. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as set forth in Exhibit "B." 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect January 4, 2000 , and shall continue until December 31, 2000 , unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B." Payment will be made only after submission of proper monthly invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $22,000 . 4. General Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 5. Addresses. City: City of Diamond Bar Consultant: Hirsch and Associates Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Pat Hirsch 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 2221 E. Winston Road, Suite A Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 Anaheim, CA 92806 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. B. Consultant agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consultant and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the City Manager or the City Manager's designee. 8. Indemnification. Consultant is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to be performed under this Agreement, and City is relying upon the skill and knowledge of Consultant to perform those services and duties. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Diamond Bar and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively Indemnitee's from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Consultant or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of the Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Consultant shall pay Indemnitees for any attorneys fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(b). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several. 9. Insurance. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (4) professional liability insurance (errors and ommissions) to cover or partially cover damages that may be the result of errors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; and (5) worker's compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater. City, its officers, employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, automotive liability, and worker's compensation coverages. The policy (ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automobile liability, shall provide that they are primary, and that any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess insurance only. A. All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non - renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) day's prior written notice thereof. Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage. B. Consultant agrees that if it does not keep the insurance in full force and effect, and such insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of Consultant and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of City, from payments due Consultant. C. Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement". 3 City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 10. Confidentiality. Consultant in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data of City, private individuals, or employees of the City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 11. Ownership of Materials. All materials provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. 12. Conflict of Interest. A. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. B. Consultant covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of hardware or software to City as a result of the performance of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 13. Termination. City may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon fifteen (15) days' written notice to Consultant. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the fifteenth (15th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, City agrees to pay Consultant for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue performing services. 14. Personnel. Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Consultant or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Consultant reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right, for good cause, to require Consultant to exclude any employee from performing services on City's premises. 15. Financial Condition. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Consultant has submitted documentation acceptable to the City Manager, establishing that it is financially solvent, such that it can reasonably be expected to perform the services required by this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall submit such financial information as may be appropriate to establish to the satisfaction of the City Manager that Consultant is in at least as sound a financial position as was City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement the case prior to entering into this Agreement. Financial information submitted to the City Manager shall be returned to Consultant after review and shall not be retained by City. 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Consultant shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of City relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 17. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, and any attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shat l be void and of no effect. 18. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall meet with Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, City may direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. 19. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 20. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 21. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 22. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile before or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 23. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 26. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. ATTEST: By: City Clerk Approved as to form: By: City Attorney "CITY" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By: Mayor "CONSULTANT" By: Its: City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement COMPANY BACKGROUND The firm of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA) was formed by Mr. Surender Dewan and Mr. Walter Lundin after many years of experience in the civil engineering and construction industry. Together they provide to the County of Orange almost fifty years of experience in the design and construction of municipal, residential and commercial projects. We have been very fortunate to have developed long-lasting relationships in numerous communities, including Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, Diamond Bar, South Gate, Anaheim, Baldwin Park, Cerritos and San Dimas, as well as the County of Los Angeles. These relationships are based on our commitment to always provide the best and most comprehensive service in a timely and cost-effective manner. DLA provides a full realm of services to various clients for their street improvement and new roadway design projects. Our staff has been responsible for preliminary and final plans, specifications and estimates, projects and contract administration, construction observation, right-of-way engineering, field and construction surveying, pavement evaluation and rehabilitation, alignment studies, bicycle roadway systems, environmental impact studies, street lighting plans, landscape architecture, construction traffic control plans, bid documents, and preparation of as -constructed drawings. Our staff is also familiar with government funding requirements such as Community Development BlockGrants, Federal Aid Urban, Housing and Urban Development, Local Public Works Act Bill, Housing and Community Development Administration, and Arterial Highway Financing Programs, ISTEA, and Measure "M". DLA is staffed with registered civil engineers, designers, construction observers, contract administrators and surveyors, and specialists in transportation, building and safety. DLA is uniquely qualified to respond to the diverse needs of our clientele. COMPANY PROFILE INTRODUCTION DLA is a minority-owned business enterprise that provides engineering and related services to municipalities, government entities, and private industries throughout Southern California. With a staff of registered civil engineers, designers, construction observers, contract administrators, surveyors, and specialists in transportation, building and safety, and computer- aided design/drafting, DLA is uniquely qualified to respond to the diverse needs of our clientele. AVAILABLE SERVICES: Specifically, DLA can provide an extensive range of services including the following: DLA prepares plans, specifications, estimates of probable cost, bid packages and other project documentation, and offers recommendations on a variety of engineering/public works issues and problems such as traffic control, infrastructure alignment to municipalities and governmental agencies for various types of capital improvement projects. Typical projects include the following: Highways/local streets including pavement rehabilitation, street lighting, landscaped medians, traffic signals, signing and striping. Potable water systems including water supply, transmission pipelines, and distribution pipelines. ° Sewer systems including force mains, manhole rehabilitation, and treatment facilities. Storm drain systems including hydrology studies/analyses, inundation studies and flood plain mapping. Building and safety plan checking, including checking plans for conformance to the UBC, UMC, UPC, NEC, the Uniform Building Security Code, and California State Title 24, as well as conformance to city requirements and conditions of approval. Inspection services have included observation for the construction's compliance with plans, code sections, and conditions of approval. Other available services: In order to provide a full range of services to meet our clients' needs, DLA provides structural engineering services, plan review, construction observation, and project/contract administration services. DLA also performs topographic, boundary, ALTA, aerial and construction surveys, and mapping services. Specifically, these services include: Field Observation/Plan Review Field investigation services, reviewing plans and specifications for conformity to the Subdivision Map Act, County Subdivision Standards, parcel map standards, and City Standards and conditions of approval, as well as verifying calculations such as hydrology/hydraulic, constructibility of improvements, and quantity takeoffs. Subdivision and on-site/off-site improvement plan review include reviewing tentative maps, parcel maps, tract maps, grading plans, street improvement plans, striping plans, utility plans, and hydrology/hydraulic calculations. Public works plan review includes reviewing improvement plans designed by private consultants for municipalities. This includes reviewing plans, structural area, and hydrology calculations, specifications, maps, and verifying constructibility. Site Development DLA works closely with the client to develop preliminary planning documents necessary to obtain funding and agency approvals. These services include: Preparation of tentative and final tract maps and parcel maps. Grading plans and on-site utility plans. Hydrology study and hydraulics. ° Preliminary construction estimates. Easement dedication descriptions and plats. Construction Observation DLA provides resident engineers, contract administrators and construction observers during the construction of various public works -type projects. Construction observation typically includes: Verifying and monitoring quality and cost control. Verifying and monitoring methods of construction against plans and specifications. Preparation of daily diaries. DLA provides coordination and control during the construction phase of public works projects such as street rehabilitation/improvements, street lighting, storm drain, sewer, and water main system improvements. Contract administration services typically include: ° Reviewing bids for completion and arithmetic accuracy. Checking references of low bidder. ° Scheduling and presiding over pre -construction meetings, including notification of utilities and other agencies. Supervising construction observers. ° Preparing weekly reports from daily inspection reports. ° Making periodic on-site visits to keep apprised of construction progress and conditions. ° Preparing weekly notices of working days used by contractor including accounting of holidays, rain days, etc. ° Monitoring contractor's work progress. ° Reviewing certified payroll records for compliance with prevailing wage laws including spot checking construction observer's daily report of labor against the contractor's certified payroll. ° Preparing tabulation of completed construction quantities for purposes of preparing and submitting contractor's invoice for approval by the client's Project Manager. Surveying The surveying activities at DLA have been organized and staffed to provide efficient and timely service. Our survey crews have the technical expertise and experience to perform topographic, aerial, ALTA, boundary, construction, as -constructed, cadastral, geodetic, and hydrographic surveys, as well as conduct special studies on projects as may be required, including subsidence monitoring. Mapping activities include preparing boundary plots, tract and parcel maps, records -of -survey, and legal descriptions and deeds. SURENDER M..DEWAN, P.E. PROJECT ASSIGNMENT: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Delhi University, 1970 Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Washington University, 1978 ACTIVE REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer, California - RCE 34559 Civil Engineer, Nevada - RCE 11221 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND: Mr. Dewan, Principal of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA), has over 28 years of professional experience in the design of Public Works projects. Mr. Dewan is responsible for performing and/or coordinating engineering design and other related technical services including project management; preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, design; and evaluation of major storm drain projects and street improvement projects, including numerous projects involving rubberized asphalt. Mr. Dewan has served as Project Manager on numerous municipal projects: • Historical Park Nature Trail - Fountain Valley • South Gate Park and Stanford Park Improvements - South Gate • Pantera Park - Diamond Bar • Pinetree Park Improvements -Tustin • Holmes Avenue Street Improvements - County of Los Angeles • Towne Center - South Gate • Nohl Ranch Road Improvements, Walnut Canyon to Stage Coach Road - Anaheim • East Newport Heights Storm Drain - Newport Beach • 1996-1997 CDBG Street Renovation Project - Baldwin Park • Baldwin Park Boulevard Improvements - Baldwin Park • South Laguna Beach Storm Drain - Laguna Beach • Firestone Boulevard Improvements - South Gate • Southern Avenue Improvements - South Gate • Ambushers and Meadowglen Street and Storm Drain Improvements - Diamond Bar • Brea Canyon Road and Brea Canyon Cut-off Street Improvements - Diamond Bar • Diamond Bar Blvd. Improvements, Grand Ave. to State Route 60 - Diamond Bar • Diamond Bar Blvd. Improvements, Palomino to Temple - Diamond Bar • Sunset Crossing Improvements - Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.X TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 28,1999 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Award of Contract for the Development of Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan. SUMMARY: The Parks Master Plan recommends the completion of a Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan. This plan will identify locations for trails and bicycle routes within the City and connectors to adjacent cities. It will also identify potential land acquisitions and easements needed to complete the trails system. The City Council has allocated $50,000 in the current fiscal year budget to complete this plan. Staff released a Request For Proposals (R.F.P.) to seek a consultant to complete this work. A total of five proposals were received and the two firms that submitted the highest rated proposals were interviewed. Staff is recommending that a contract for this work be awarded to The Roth Group, which will use a public input process to complete the plan. RECOMMENDATION ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the completion of the Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan to The Roth Group in the amount of $48,500. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Resolution(s) _ Ordinance(s) X Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) X Other: Request for Proposals. Proposal submitted by The Roth Group. SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: other affected Dept. — Public Works REVI WE BY: VB IA END: Terrence L. Bela r James DeStefano City Manager Deputy City Manager Community Services Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Development of Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan ISSUE STATEMENT This contract will result in the identification of locations for potential trails and bicycle routes, standard recommended designs and essential easement and land acquisition opportunities. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the completion of the Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan to The Roth Group in the amount of $48,500. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The City Council has appropriated $50,000 in the 1999/2000 FY budget for the completion of the Trails and Bicycle Routes Master Plan. BACKGROUND YEAR The City Council appropriated $50,000 in the 1999/2000 fiscal budget to have a consultant develop a trails and bicycle master plan for the City of Diamond Bar. Staff developed and released a Request for Proposals (R.F.P.) to solicit proposals from firms with experience completing this type of work. Staff received five proposals in response to the R.F.P. The proposals were reviewed by staff and the two firms that submitted the highest ranked proposals were interviewed. Staff determined that The Roth Group is the most qualified firm to complete this work. DISCUSSION The Roth Group submitted a proposal for $46,700 to complete the work requested in the R.F.P., plus $1,800 for reimbursables, for a total proposed fee of $48,500. The Roth Group has compiled a team of consultants to complete the work. Hirsch and Associates will provide landscape architecture; Austin Foust will provide traffic engineering; and Dewan, Lundin & Associates, the civil engineering. PREPARED BY: Bob Rose Community Services Director CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of January 4, 2000 and between the City of Diamond Bar, a municipal corporation ("City") and The Roth Group , ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide consulting services to City, as set forth in Exhibit "A", the City's Request for Proposals dated September 7 1999. B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "B", the Consultant's Response, dated September 7—, 1999 to the City's Request for Proposals. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as set forth in Exhibit "B." 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect January 4, 2000 , and shall continue until December 31, 2000 , unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B." Payment will be made only after submission of proper monthly invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $48,500 . 4. General Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 5. Addresses. City: City of Diamond Bar Consultant: The Roth Group Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Marlene Roth 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 200 N. Maryland Ave., Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 Glendale, CA 91206-4262 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. B. Consultant agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consultant and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the City Manager or the City Manager's designee. 8. Indemnification. Consultant is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to be performed under this Agreement, and City is relying upon the skill and knowledge of Consultant to perform those services and duties. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Diamond Bar and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively Indemnitee's from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Consultant or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of the Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Consultant shall pay Indemnitees for any attorneys fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(b). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution againstthe Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several. 9. Insurance. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (4) professional liability insurance (errors and ommissions) to cover or partially cover damages that may be the result of errors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; and (5) worker's compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater. City, its officers, employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, automotive liability, and worker's compensation coverages. The policy (ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automobile liability, shall provide that they are primary, and that any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess insurance only. A. All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non - renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) day's prior written notice thereof. Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage. B. Consultant agrees that if it does not keep the insurance in full force and effect, and such insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of Consultant and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of City, from payments due Consultant. C. Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement". City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 10. Confidentiality. Consultant in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data of City, private individuals, or employees of the City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 11. Ownership of Materials. All materials provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. 12. Conflict of Interest. A. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. B. Consultant covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of hardware or software to City as a result of the performance of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 13. Termination. City may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon fifteen (15) days' written notice to Consultant. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the fifteenth (15th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, City agrees to pay Consultant for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue performing services. 14. Personnel. Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Consultant or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Consultant reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right, for good cause, to require Consultant to exclude any employee from performing services on City's premises. 15. Financial Condition. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Consultant has submitted documentation acceptable to the City Manager, establishing that it is financially solvent, such that it can reasonably be expected to perform the services required by this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall submit such financial information as may be appropriate to establish to the satisfaction of the City Manager that Consultant is in at least as sound a financial position as was City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement the case prior to entering into this Agreement. Financial information submitted to the City Manager shall be returned to Consultant after review and shall not be retained by City. 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Consultant shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of City relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 17. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, and any attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. 18. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall meet with Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, City may direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. 19. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 20. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 21. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 22. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile before or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 23. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 26. reference. written above. ATTEST: By: Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney "CITY" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By: Mayor "CONSULTANT" By: Its: City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Hirsch & Associates Inc. Landscape Architecture and Planning 2221 E. Winston Road, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Principal Patrick L. Hirsch, Landscape Architect, ASLA Hirsch & Associates, a California corporation is a landscape architectural and planning firm specializing in planning and development of park and recreation facilities, streetscapes, freeway landscape enhancement and commercial retail centers for the past 20 years. Established in 1977 as Heimberger/Hirsch & Associates and incorporated as Hirsch & Associates in 1997, the firm has designed and developed over 120 parks, 18 streetscape and landscape enhancement projects, and 40 commercial retail centers throughout Southern California. The experience of the firm's principals and staff establish it as a leading design firm in the field of landscape architecture. Planning, designing and building a project for today's needs is an all encompassing challenge. The practice of landscape architecture has become an integrated team effort carefully considering the needs and desires of the people who live, work and play within the projects we design. As landscape architects and planners, we have a responsibility to the general public to create the best possible environment. The knowledge to design this environment is obtained from two sources, past experience; which helps provide a practical and timely design within budget restraints, and our vision of the future; which gives our designs life and meaning that will grow beyond the present. The professional staff of Hirsch & Associates, Inc. are registered landscape architects, selected on the basis of knowledge, talent, creativity and experience on a wide variety of projects. The professional experience of the firm has been recognized through the following awards granted by the California Park and Recreation Society, Landscape Architectural Foundation / Class Fund and the California Department of Rehabilitation. California Park And Recreation Society Special Award Of Excellence 1991 La Cienega Park and Tennis Complex, Beverly Hills Environmental Planning Awards 1997 McCambridge Park, City of Burbank 1996 Mission Oaks Park, Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District 1993 Citrus Park, City of Anaheim 1992 YMCA Ecke Sports Park, City of Encinitas 1991 La Cienega Park and Tennis Complex, Beverly Hills 1989 Birdsall Park, City of Rialto 1987 Rosewood Park, City of Cerritos 1985 Don Derr Park and Sports Complex, City of Riverside 1983 Verdugo Park, City of Glendale Hir5ch -- 6 AssociateS 10c. Merit Awards 1990 Cerritos Sports Complex, City of Cerritos 1988 Kit Carson Adult Athletic Facility, City of Escondido 1988 San Dimas SportsPlex, City of San Dimas LAE/Class Fund 1990 Cen itos Sports Complex, City of Cerritos 1987 Rosewood Park, City of Cerritos California Department of Rehabilitation 1987 Rosewood Park, City of Cerritos Corporate Headq art r 2221 E. Winston Road, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 Federal JD. Number 33-0299754 Corporate Officer Mr. Patrick L. Hirsch, President Mr. Thomas Kowalewski, Financial Officer Primary Disc i pli nes/Resou rces/S er vices Hirsch & Associates Inc. provides complete landscape architectural and planning services, including masterplanning and feasibility studies, construction documents, construction observation and construction management services. Structural, civil, architectural and electrical engineering services are provided by retention of appropriate consultants highly experienced within their professional fields. Construction management and inspections are provided by in-house staff. Financial References Mr. Thomas Kowalewski, EA (714) 525-1520 First Bank & Trust, Fullerton, CA (714) 870-5300 Dun & Bradstreet Rating 1R2 DUNS: 16-529-7367 Insurance References Professional Liability Insurance $1,000,000 CNA General Liability Insurance $1,000,000 Irvine Insurance Agency Worker's Compensation Insurance as required State Fund (additional insurance may be provided upon request) CaliforniaRegistration Numbers Patrick L. Hirsch, Landscape Architect #1710 Identification of Employees Male Female Principal Landscape Architects 1 0 Registered Staff Landscape Architects 1 0 Technical/Drafting/Production 3 1 Secretarial/Word Processing 0 2 MrSch Construction Inspector 1 0 6Associates— Regional Parks Size Category Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Challenger Park Master Plan and Design Development Report Community Parks City of Anaheim Pearson Park - Swimming Pool Complex Twila Reid Park Playground Renovation Pelanconi Park 140 Acres Regional Park 4 Acres Community Park 3 Acres Community Park 25 Acres Community Park City of Beverly Hills La Cienega Park / Tennis Center 18 Acres Community Park * 1991 CPRS Environmental Planning Award * 1991 CPRS Award of Excellence * 1991 California Landscape Contractors Association Achievement Award * 1992 United States Tennis Association Outstanding Facility Award City of Burbank McCambridge Park 18 Acres Community Park * 1997 CPRS Environmental Planning Award City of Carson Scott Park Improvements 8 Acres Community Park Veterans Park Improvements 12 Acres Community Park City of Fontana Southridge Park 20 Acres Community Park City of Glendale Verdugo Park 28 Acres Community Park * 1983 CPRS Environmental Planning Award City of La Palma Central Park 10 Acres Community Park City of Mission Viejo Alicia Park - Phase One 16 Acres Community Park City of Montebello Grant Rea Park Renovation 30 Acres Community Park Central Park Renovation 30 Acres Community Park I itSch ._� b /associates Inc. Community Parks (Cont.) Size lategory City of Ontario Homer Briggs Memorial Park 17 Acres Community Park City of Riverside 15 Acres Community Park Bryant Park 20 Acres Community Park La Sierra Park 35 Acres Community Park Reid Park City of Walnut 20 Acres Community Park Creekside Park * 1986 CPRS Merit Award Ortega Trail Recreation and Park District 15 Acres Community Park Marna O'Brien Park Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District 20 Acres Community Park Mission Oak Park * 1996 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Neiuhhnrhood Parks City of Anaheim Citrus Park * 1994 CPRS Environmental Planning Award City of Brea Arovista Park - Phase Two City of Burbank Pacific Park City of Cerritos Rosewood Park * 1987 CPRS Environmental Planning Award * 1987 LAF/Class Fund Honor Award * 1988 State Rehabilitation Merit Award for Handicap Access City of Culver City Lindberg Park - Irrigation Design City of Encinitas Orpheus Road Park 2-1/2 Acres Neighborhood Park 10 Acres Neighborhood Park 7 Acres Neighborhood Park 5 Acres Neighborhood Park 6 Acres Neighborhood Park 3 Acres Neighborhood Park lair ch �, Associates Inc. Neighborhood Parks (Cont) Size Category City of Fullerton Ford Park 4 Acres Neighborhood Park City of Huntington Beach Norma B. Gibbs Park & Monarch Butterfly Habitat 5 Acre Neighborhood Park City of Maywood City of Maywood Swimming Pool Complex Q Acre Neighborhood Park City .of Riverside Rancho Loma Park 8 Acres Neighborhood Park Rutland Park 7 Acres Neighborhood Park City of San Dimas Via Verde Park 4 Acres Neighborhood Park City of Vista Breeze Hills Park l0 Acres Neighborhood Park Bub Williamson Park ]0 Acres Neighborhood Park Snorts Facilities City of Cerritos Cerritos Sports Complex 28 Acres Sports Facility * 1990 LAF/Class Fund Honor Award City of Encinitas YMCA Ecke Sports Park 15 Acres Sports Facility City of Escondido Kit Carson Youth Athletic Area 20 Acres Regional Park Kit Carson Adult Athletic Area 20 Acres Regional Park * 1988 CPRS Environmental Planning Award City of Glendale Freeway Park "Site B" Sports Complex 20 Acres Sports Facility City of Huntington Beach Edison ParklKettler School 25 acres Sports Facility City of Rialto Rialto Sports Complex Birdsall Park Sports Facility * 1989 CPRS Environmental Planning Award 20 Acres Sports Facility 8 Acres Neighborhood Park Hirsch 6 AssociateS Inc. S-ports Facilities (Cont.)Size Cateeorv_ City of Riverside Don Lorenzi Sports Complex 15 Acres Acres Sports Facility Sports Facility Don Derr Sports Complex 20 * 1985 CPRS Environmental Planning Award City of San Dimas San Dimas SportsPlex 34 Acres Sports Facility * 1988 CPRS Merit Award City of San Juan Capistrano San Juan Capistrano Sports Park 18 Acres Sports Facility Ortega Trail Recreation and Park District 15 Acres Special Use Facility Butterfield Park Improvements ial J1se Faciliti City of Alhambra Joslyn Center City of Buena Park Whitaker -Jaynes Estate City of Burbank Brace Canyon Memorial Grove City of Claremont Joslyn Center Courtyard City of Covina Covina Metro -Link Station City of Fullerton Muckenthaler Cultural Center Improvements City of Glendale Adult Recreation Center City of Montebello Montebello Golf Course Club House City of Ontario Milliken Avenue Water Tank Beautification and City Entry 2 Acres Special Use Facility Q Acre Special Use Facility 4 Acres Special Use Facility J2 Acre Special Use Facility 2 Acres Special Use Facility 4 Acres Special Use Facility 10 Acres Special Use Facility 10 Acres Special Use Facility 10 Acres Special Use Facility Sch -- Associates Inc- Facilities (Cont.) Ci7.P (atPunr City of Riverside Bryant Park Child Care Facility 3 Acres Special Use Facility City of Southgate Southgate Corporate Yard 1 Acre Special Use Facility City of Vista Raintree Park Education Center Improvements 15 Acres Community Park Wildwood Park Community Center 5 Acres Neighborhood Park City of West Hollywood Plummer Park Pepsi Play Area Q Acre Community Park West Hollywood Community Gardens 0 Acre Special Use Facility Mini -Parks City of Anaheim Colony Park l Acre Mini -Park * 1980 Landscape Architectural Design Recognition Award City of Glendale Wilson Street Mini -Park 1 Acre Mini -Park Park Master Plans City of Anaheim Pearson Park Master Plan 20 Acres Community Park City of Burbank McCambridge Park Master Plan 18 Acres Community Park City of Cerritos Cerritos Park East Master Plan 20 Acres Community Park City of Encinitas Moonlight Beach Master Plan 20 Acres Community Beach City of Fontana Southridge Community Park Master Plan Community Wide Community Park City of La Palma Central Park Master Plan 10 Acres Community Park City of Mission Viejo Alicia Park Master Plan 16 Acres Community Park ffir5ch -- & Associates Inc. Park Master Plan (Cont.) size CateQor City of Monrovia Recreation Park Master Plan 22 Acres Community Park City of Montebello Chet Holifield Park Master Plan 16 acres Community Park Ortega Trail Recreation and Park District Marna O'Brien Park Master Plan 15 Acres Community Park Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District Mission Oaks Park Master Plan 20 Acres Community Park Pitts Ranch Park Master Plan 14 Acres Community Park City of Rialto Cactus Basin Park Master Plan 20 Acres Community Park Rialto Park Master Plan 20 Acres Sports Facility County of San Diego Fallbrook Multi -Use Sports Facility Master Plan 17 Acres Sports Facility 11fir5ch -- b Associates Inc. Patrick L. Hirsch, President Landscape Architect #1710 ASLA Principal Education Degree in Engineering Design and Technology Pensacola College, Pensacola Florida. Degree in Horticulture Fullerton College, Fullerton California Extended studies in sports facilities design Extended studies in irrigation design Professional Responsibilities Client Development Marketing Project Management Project Design Design Team Coordinator Public Presentations Construction Management Experience Upon graduation and completion of service in the United States Navy, Mr. Hirsch served as project manager with the firm of Recreation Land Planners, responsibilities included planning / design and preparation of construction documents for a wide variety of park and recreation projects. Furthering his career, Mr. Hirsch served as park planner for the City of Anaheim for 6 years prior to forming the firm of Hirsch & Associates Inc. Responsibilities with the city included park design and development of 13 major park facilities, presentations at City Council and Commission meetings and assisting in the preparation of grant applications and annual park budgets. Mr. Hirsch has over 26 years professional experience in the practice of landscape architecture and is recognized as a leading professional in the field of municipal park design, streetscapes, commercial retail landscape design and redevelopment landscape projects. Mr. Hirsch was a principal partner in the firm of Heimberger/Hirsch from 1977 to 1997 and formed the firm of Hirsch & Associates in 1997. This experience will translate into a well thought-out project with attention to details that address efficient landscape planning, cost effective development, safety, water conservation, and ease of maintenance. He is involved on a state-wide basis with the State Board of Landscape Architects, the California Park and Recreation Society, the Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation, National Park and Recreation Society, and the Southwest Maintenance Management School. Personal Achievements California Park & Recreation Society Awards Award of Excellence 1991 La Cienega Park and Tennis Complex, City of Beverly Hills, CA Environmental Planning Awards 1997 McCambridge Park, City of Burbank, CA 1996 Mission Oaks Park, Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District, Camarillo, CA 1983 Verdugo Park, City of Glendale, CA Merit Awards 1988 San Dimas SportsPlex, City of San Dimas, CA HirSch 1986 Creekside Park, City of Walnut, CA E ASSociateS Inc. California Landscape Contractors Association Achievement Award 1991 La Cienega Park & Tennis Complex, City of Beverly Hills, CA United States Tennis Association Outstanding Facility Award 1992 La Cienega Park & Tennis Complex, City of Beverly Hills, CA American Institute of Landscape Architects Design Recognition 1980 Colony Park, City of Anaheim Sunset Magazine Design Recognition Award 1996 Norma Gibbs Park and Monarch Butterfly Habitat, City of Huntington Beach, CA Affiliations American Society of Landscape Architects State Board of Landscape Architects California Landscape Contractors Association California Park and Recreation Society National Park and Recreation Society ch 6 Associates Inc. Charles Foley Project Manager Education Architectural & Civil Design certification, Porter & Chester Institute, Watertown, CT Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Professional Responsibilities With direct support from the principal partner, Mr. Foley's responsibilities include: * Project Management * Client Contact and Development * Marketing * Graphic Design * Rendering * Project Production * Computer Systems Management * Construction Document Preparation Experience Prior to Mr. Foley joining Hirsch & Associates, Inc in 1996, Mr. Foley completed an internship with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. Furthermore, He studied architectural and civil design at Porter + Chester Institute; as well as, attended California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Mr. Foley has increasingly expanded his capabilities at Hirsch & Associates, Inc. by attending irrigation industry design workshop seminars, playground industry design safety seminars, as well as, extended studies in horticulture design. He is responsible for the design, development , and construction management of a wide range of successfully completed projects. Representative Projects Experience * Glendale Sports Complex — City of Glendale * Jurupa Valley Big League Dreams — Riverside County * McCambridge Park — City of Burbank * Sunnymead Park — City of Moreno Valley * Mission Oaks Park — Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District * UCLA Soccer Fields — University of California, Los Angeles * Eldred Lokker Park — City of Camarillo * Grant Howald Park — City of Newport Beach * Hermosa Beach Greenbelt — City of Hermosa Beach * Grant Howald Park — City of Newport Beach Sch _— Associates Inc. PROFESSIONAL FEES Professional fees for services stated include all costs for general overhead, profit, telephone, clerical, travel and incidental expenses not separately requested. Professional fees are good for (90) ninety days from the date of proposal. All services not completed within 12 months from date of Notice to Proceed will be subject to an adjustment per consumer price index as published in the Wall Street Journal on a (12) twelve months basis. * Principal .............................. $120/hr. ................................................. * Landscape Architect ............................................................. $100/hr. ................................. * Project Manager ...................................... ............................... $75/hr. * Technical Support ...................... * Office / Clerical...................................................................... $40/hr. * Project Meetings ....................... ......$250/ea. ...................................... * Travel............................................. ..................................... $0.35/hr. * Reproduction / Printing ............................................... Cost Plus 10% Hirsch -- E Associates Inc. CPRS Environmental Planning Awards Sports Facilities 1985, Don Derr Sports Complex City of Riverside, Parks & Recreation Department 1988, San Dimas SportsPlex City of San Dimas, Parks & Recreation Department 1989, Birdsall Park Sports Facility City of Rialto, Community Services Department 1990, Cerritos Sports Complex City of Cerritos, Community Services Department 1993, YMCA Paul Ecke Sports Park City of Encinitas, Community Services Department Community Parks 1983, Verdugo Park City of Glendale, Community Services Department 1986, Creekside Park, Merit Award City of Walnut, Parks & Recreation Department 1991, La Cienega Park City of Beverly Hills, Recreation & Parks Department 1996, Mission Oaks Community Park City of Camarillo, Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District 1997, McCambridge Park City of Burbank, Parks & Recreation Department Neighborhood Parks 1987, Rosewood Park City of Cerritos, Community Services Department 1994, Citrus Park City of Anaheim, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Department Hirsch MsSocic-3teS Iqc. Bub Williamson Park, City of Vista This 7 -acre site was designed as a neigh borhood park, with an emphasis on sports activities. Site elements consist of 2 -little league fields, picnic areas and riparian area. Construction cost $300,000. Contact Mr. Jim Porter, Director (619) 726-1340, Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Civil, Gilbert Engineering Kirsch &/associates Inc. WCAMBRIDGE PARK, City of Burbank 1997 CPRS Environmental Planning Award This beautiful 17.8 acre park site is a major part of the City's park system and provides organized sports play op- portunities for the residents of Burbank throughout the year and open space for passive recreation activities. The site is adjacent to major city thoroughfares and easily acces- sible from the Golden State Freeway. McCambridge Park boasts 2 -softball fields with lighting, a tennis center with restaurant and pro shop, 8 -regulation tennis courts, 2 -clay tennis courts, 1 -tournament court with grandstand, bas- ketball court, 2 -bocci ball courts, a playground and tot lot to delight children of all ages, open picnic areas, 50M pool, community center, gymnasium and ample parking for more than 380 vehicles. The landscape architect incorporated a variety of landscape textures into the master plan of the park for aesthetic interest. Contact Ms. Jan Bartolo (818) 238-5315. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Gane Architectural Group Civil Gilbert Engineering Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Kirsch & /associates Inc. SAN DIMAS SPORTSPLEX, City of San Dimas 1988 CPRS Merit Award San Dimas Sportsplex is a 32 acre special use facility located at San Dimas High School. This project was a joint venture between the City of San Dimas and the Bonita Unified School District. The Bonita Unified School District provided the land, and the City of San Dimas provided funding for construction. The City controls program sched- uling and maintenance. Facilities consist of 8 -tennis courts with light- ing. 3-softball/Pony League fields with lighting and 60 ft. base paths, 1- Junior Varsity baseball field with 90 ft. base paths, l -Varsity b aseball field with lighting and 90 ft. base paths. 2 -regulation soccer fields with lighting. 1 -high school football stadium, restroom concession, main- tenance and office building, and appropriate parking to accommodate all facilities. Project requirements consisted of masterplanning, con- struction documents and construction observation. Construction cost - 2.5 million dollars. Contact Ms. Sally Duff (909) 394-6230. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Dan L. Rowland & Associates Structural Johnson & Nielson Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Mirsch &/associates Inc. DON DERR PARK AND SPORTS COMPLEX, City of Riverside 1985 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Don Derr Park and Sports Complex is a 20 acre park built by the City of Riverside in a flood control retention basin owned by the County Flood Control District. Facilities include 2 -softball fields, I - Little League field, 1 -baseball field. I -soccer field and 1 -football field. All sports fields are lighted. Support facilities include restroom concession maintenance buildings, basketball court, childrens play area, picnic area and parking. Project requirements consist of masterplanning, negotiation with County Flood Control District, providing construction documents and construction observation. Construction cost - 1.5 million dollars. Contact Mr. Robert Johnson (909) 955-43 10. Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Structural Hartman Engineering Electrical RWR Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Kirsch & /associates Inc. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO SPORTS PARK, City of San Juan Capistrano San Juan Capistrano Sports Park is approximately 20 -acres in size and located east of Marco Foster Junior High School, north of Camino Del Avion on the 56 -acre city -owned agricultural preserve. The new Del Obispo Elementary School is proposed to be constructed north of the park site. Park elements consist of I lighted Championship baseball field with covered spectator seating for 350 person capac- ity, 1.800 square feet restroom/concession/storage building. 3.000 square feet plaza and food court, 1 lighted softball field with spectator seating for 250 person capacity. 1 lighted soccer field overlay on lighted softball field, 3 soccer fields, children's play area, park drive to service the park and future school, future Olympic size swimming pool and future 32,000 square feet community center. Con- struction costs are approximately 2 million dollars with park funding provided by City Open Space Bond Act. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Crane Architectural Group Structural Correia Consulting Civil DGA Consultants Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Kirsch & Associates Inc. JURUPA VALLEY BIG LEAGUE DREAMS, County of Riverside (under construction) Jurupa Valley Big League Dreams is currently under construction. The site contains the following amenities; (3) replica lighted ballfields depicting Fenway Park, the polo grounds and forties field. (3) 300' soccer fields, (2) baseball fields, (3) sand volleyball courts, batting cages with (8) batting stations. stadium club (restaurant), administration building and restrooms, play structure, maintenance build- ing, allocated space for additional parking, (4) H arena and a multipurpose court. Prime Consultant: HNTB/Design Build. Subconsultants: Landscape Architect Architect Structural Civil Electrical Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Albert Group Correia Consulting Webb Associates Reedcorp Engineering w Hirsch E AssociateS Inc. Norma Brandel Gibbs Park, City of Huntington Beach Planning Process The megalopolis of Southern California is comprised of miles of con- crete, millions of vehicles and myriads of people. It is hard to com- prehend that a municipal park and recreation department would ever have an opportunity or even the resource to preserve a natural habitat. For the City of Huntiniton Beach this opportunity became a reality in the form of Norma Brandel Gibbs Park. This historical and ecological significance of the site overruled the possibility of adesign normally used for recreational facilities. There are no baseball diamonds. group picnic shelters, parking lots. or the array of other amenities found in a typical Southern California park. Instead Norma Brandel Gibbs park is a century old 5 acre Stand of eucalyptus globulus that has served as a wintering site for the Mon- arch Butterfly. With this unique aspect the City of Huntington Beach had the opportunity to develop a park like no other. a winter haven for the Monarch Butterfly, Design The design challenge was to develop a plan that preserved the Mon- arch habitat and allowed for the interaction of visitors to the park. Several issues had to be resolved. First, the eucalyptus grove was in a state of decline due to stress from years of drought and neglect. Numerous trees had become infested with the Australian Beetle. Next, an understanding of the wintering habits of the Monarch Butterfly had to be gained in order to finally develop a unique interpretive con- cept to tie the project together. Project completion 1995. MrSch & AssociateS Inc. PAUL ECKE SPORTS PARK, City of Encinitas 1993 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Normally the YMCA requires the city's permission to place a facility within the park, however, the City of Encinitas sub- mitted a proposal to the YMCA to lease 8 acres of YMCA owned property for the development of a multi -use sports facility. Project elements consist of 4-baseball/softball fields_ 2 -soccer field overlays with lighting, restroom building, spec- tator seating. jogging track and parking area. Construction cost - 1.3 million dollars. Contact David Wigginton (760) 633-2600. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Civil Gilbert En-ineering Electrical Creative Building Systems Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Hirsch & Associates inc. KIT CARSON PARK ADULT /YOUTH ATHLETIC AREA, City of Escondido 1988 CPRS Merit Award Kit Carson Park is a 290 acre regional park facility. The Adult Softball Complex consists of 4 -softball fields with lighting, restroom/concession building and parking area. Construction cost - $950,000. The Youth Athletic Area consists of 3 -girls softball fields with lighting. 2 -Little League fields with lizhtin2, 1 -cap field, I -Tee Ball field and 5 -soccer fields with lighting. Facilities include 2 -restroom concession areas, storage facilities and parking area. Construction cost - Contact Mr. Neal Osias (760) 839-4691. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Structural Electrical Hartman Engin Dream Enginef Geotechnical M.V. Engineers 7 million dollars. Kirsch & /associates Inc. MISSION OAKS PARK, Pleasant Valley Recreation & Park District 1996 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Mission Oaks Park is an existing 10 -acre community park consisting of 2 softball fields, 60 car parking lot, restroom/concession building and children's play area. Future park development includes an additional 10 - acres of the north and east sides of the park and interfacing the adjacent school into the total site Masterplan. New facilities include an additional softball field with sports lighting for all softball fields, larger children's play area, amphitheater and group picnic area, 6000 S.F. community center with recreational pool, 6 lighted tennis courts, 233 additional parking spaces, sand volleyball courts and 5 -acres of open plan/picnic area. Proposed construction budget is 3 million dollars. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Crane Architectural Group Structural Correia Consulting Civil Gilbert Engineering Electrical Creative Building Systems Hirsch & /associates Inc. SOUTHRIDGE PARK, City of Fontana This 25 acre park was developed through a joint agreement between the City of Fontana and Creative Communities, a land development company. Park elements consist of a 6.000 sq. ft. community building. swimming pool. 4 -tennis courts, childrens play area. 2 -Little League/ softball fields with soccer overlay and lighting. picnic areas and parking facilities. The sports field area is also used by an elementary school built south of this project. Project requirements consisted of masterplC n tact construction documents and construction observation. Construction cost - 2.5 million dollars. Contact Mr. Paul Burton. Park Development Coordinator (909) 350-6760. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Dan L. Rowland Associates Structural Johnson & Nielson Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Hirsch &/associates Inc. CERRITOS SPORTS COMPLEX, City of Cerritos 1990 CPRS Merit Award 1990 LAFICLASS FUND Honor Award This 27 acre multi -sports complex was designed to meet the current and future needs of the City of Cerritos. Project elements consist of 1-350 ft. baseball field, 1-300 ft. baseball/ softball field combina- tion, 3-280 ft. softball fields. 3 -regulation soccer fields and 3 -junior soccer fields. All fields are lighted and include scoreboard and PA system. Facilities include restroom/concession/ operations office. built- in bleacher spectator. seating, scorebooths, parking area and maintenance building. Future features include batting cage, picnic area and play area. Construction cost - 4.3 million dollars. Contact Joe Mendoza (562) 916-1254 ext. 1256 Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Dan L. Rowland & Associates Structural Johnson & Nielson Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Acoustical Colia Acoustical MrSch & /kssociateS Inc. LA CIENEGA PARK, City of Beverly Hills 1991 CPRS Award of'Excellence 1991 CPRS Environmental Planning Award 1991 CLCA Honor Award 1992 USA Tennis Association Outstanding Tennis Facility Award La Cienega Park is a 17 acre community park originally constructed in the 1920's. Our work focused on the redesign of the park to upgrade facilities to meet todays recreation demands. New facilities consist of 15 -tennis courts with lighting, 8,000 sq. ft. tennis clubhouse and pro -shop, championship court with light- ing and spectator seating for 450 -people, 340 -car parking garage (beneath the tennis courts to support the park as well as surround- ing commercial development), practice putting green, open lawn play area,plazas, childrens play area, picnic area, 2 -Little League ballfields with lighting and 60 ft. base paths, regulation size base- ball field with lighting and 90 ft. base paths, 2 -batting cages, re- stroom/scorebooth building. 2-scorebooth buildings. maintenance building and maint- enance yard. Construction cost - 9.3 million dollars. Contact: Mr. Alan Schneider (310) 285-1188. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Dan L. Rowland Associates Structural Johnson & Nielson Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Kirsch & AssociateS Inc. SUNNYMEAD PARK, City of Moreno Valley Sunnymead Park is one of the original parks that was established and maintained by the County of Riverside prior to the City of Moreno Valley's incorporation on December 3, 1984. At that time the park had already been a mainstay in the area for 26 years. but with the boom of incorporation and an influx of thousands of young families, it soon became apparent that it could no longer serve the grow- ing public demand. Thus, the renovation of this 15 acre community park is the realization of a long- term vision by the Parks & Recreation Department, as well as the Board of Directors and the commu- nity residents. One of the city's goals was to expand and improve the site so that local, regional and national tournaments could be accommodated. As the property is located within the central portion of the city, and due to the amount of funding that would be needed to complete the project ($2.6 million dollars) approval was given to use Community Development Block Grants and Redevelopment mon- ies to supplement the project budget. Contact Mark 1 . Adams (909) 413-3711. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Hirsch &/associates Inc. ROSEWOOD PARK, City of Cerritos 1987 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Consisting of 3-1/2 acres, this neighborhood park was design to meet the specific needs of the surrounding neighborhood. It was determined in the early design stages to follow a railroad theme for the park. The play area contains a locomotive, two flat cars and a caboose. The more traditional play/climbing equipment or any other thing a child's imagination could conceive. The picnic shelters were custom designed to resemble overheads that would be found at a turn of the century railroad station. Benches around the play area took on a Victorian flavor. Paving patterns around the play area and Group picnic areas contain banding patterns that represent spokes of a wheel. Other elements contained in this park are an informal baseball/ soccer field, basketball court, park benches. group and individual picnic areas and general turf open space. Construction Cost $538.900. Contact: Mr. Kevin McArdle (310) 860-0311. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Electrical Dream Engineering Kirsch & AssociateS Inc. DON DERR PARK AND SPORTS COMPLEX, City of Riverside 985 CPRS Environmental Planning Award Don Derr Park and Sports Complex is a 20 acre park built by the City of Riverside in a flood control retention basin owned by the County Flood Control District. Facilities include 2 -softball fields. I - Little League field, I -baseball field, 1 -soccer field and 1 -football field. All sports fields are lighted. Support facilities include restroom concession maintenance buildings, basketball court, ehildrens play area, picnic area and parking. Project requirements consist of masterplanning. negotiation with County Flood Control District, providing construction documents and construction observation. Construction cost - 1.5 million dollars. Contact Mr. Robert Johnson (909) 955-4310. Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Structural Hartman Engineering Electrical RWR Geotechnical Leighton & Associates Kirsch & /associates Inc. BIRSDALL PARK, City of Rialto 1989 CPRS Environmental Planning Award The design challenge on this 7-1/2 acre park was to place all required sports fields and recreation elements on the site in a logical and safe configuration. Project elements consist of 2 -lighted little league fields, 1,200 sq.ft. restroom/concession building, 1 -basketball court with night lighting, children's play are, picnic facilities and parking area. Construction cost 1.1 million dollars. Contact: Mr. Sandy McKinley (909) 860-2612. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates. Inc. Subconsultants: Structural Hartman Engineering Electrical Dream Engineering Civil Gilbert Engineering Kirsch & /associates Inc. AROVISTA PARK, City of Brea Arovista Park is a community park serving the diverse recreation needs of the citizens of Brea by offering active recreation in basketball, volleyball, childrens play and community activities for group picnic and amphitheater events with passive recreation provoded by individual picnic areas with open lawn and trees adjacent to Brea Creek Channel, a naturalized and active stream. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Belair-Crane Design Group Electrical Engineer Creative Building Systems Civil Engineer Sam Peterson & Associates Kirsch & Associates Inc. GLENDALE SPORTS COMPLEX, City of Glendale Park Completion, 1999 The Glendale Sports Complex was just completed in March 1999. The park is located in the hills above the City of Glendale. The park contains (2) soccer fields, as well as (2) soccer field overlays on softball/baseball fields, (1) baseball field, (2) softball fields, (1) separate maintenance building, (1 j concessions/restroom building, (1) building housing offices and storage, and (1) batting cage. Prime Consultant: Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Subconsultants: Architect Crane Architectural Structural Tilden Engineering Electrical Reedcorp Engineering Civil IWA Engineers Hirsch & Associates Inc. University Of California Los Angeles, SOCCER FIELDS Expansion of UCLA Medical Center and the increas- ing demand for parking, were the prerequisites for the development of the UCLA Soccer Field and Park- ing Structure #4. The projects scope was to remove the existing soccer field and construct a multilevel subterranean parking structure with a professional class soccer field atop the structure. Hirsch & Associates's responsibility was to work closely with the UCLA Athletic Department, Capi- tal Programs Department and the Project Architect to develop a subsurface drainage system, turf grass, soil profile and irrigation system to support the rig- orous demands of soccer play and practice through- out the year. The project was completed and turned over to the UCLA Athletic Department in August 1998. Consultants: Landscape Architect Hirsch & Associates, Inc Architect IPD, Inc. Structural FDG, Inc. Structural PB+A, Inc. Civil RBA Partners, Inc. Kirsch &/associates Inc. University of California Los Angeles, PARKING STRUCTURE Janss Plaza is a historical plaza dating back to the original development of UCLA. Due to the on going expansion of the campus, the plaza was removed for construction of a temporary library facility. Upon completion of the perma- nent library facility Janss Plaza was scheduled for redevel- opment to it's original historical design. Due to the increased historical design. Due to the increased demand for campus park the university wished to construct a multilevel parking structural under the plaza and connect the new structure with the adjacent soccer field parkin° structure 44. Hirsch & Associates's scope of work, included working closely with UCLA Capital Programs Department to return the plaza to its original state. while accommodating the sub- terranean parking structure below. Close coordination with the project architect and structure engineering was neces- sary to develop a structural deck and drainage system that would support the plaza's wish landscape and bricked lined walks. The project was completed and opened to the public in Julv 1999. Consultants: Landscape Architect Hirsch & Associates, Inc. Architect IPD. Inc. Structural FDG. Inc. Structural PB+A. Inc, Civil RBA Partners. Inc. MrSch & /Associates Inc. AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. 4rrd 4TES /NC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705-7827 TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 E-mail: mail 0 austinfoust.com The following are typical bicycle trails projects by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. 1. Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvement City of Diamond Bar 1998 2. Citywide Bicycle Master Plan City of Tustin 3. Back Bay Bike Trail System City of Newport Beach 1995 1994 ® qW AIIST/N-FOIIST ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705-7827 - TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 Effective January 1, 1999 AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE CATEGORY HOURLY RATE Direct expenses billed as actual costs $135 Principal $125 Associate $105 Design Engineer $75-$90 Transportation Engineer $85 Transportation Planner $65-$85 Transportation Analyst $65 Design Drafter $50-$55 Technical/Clerical Direct expenses billed as actual costs Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE The firm of Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) provides a broad range of consult- ing services in the area of traffic engineering and transportation planning. Clients served include numerous public and private entities, with services ranging from special studies directed at specific problems to comprehensive projects involving all facets of transportation and traffic engineering. The principals of the firm, Terence W. Austin and Joe E. Foust, have extensive back- grounds in all aspects of traffic engineering and transportation planning. They are supported by a professional and technical staff whose knowledge and experience combine to give the firm a broad base of traffic engineering and transportation planning capabilities. The firm has permanent offices in Orange County and maintains in-house data processing capabilities complete with a variety of software packages, many of which have been developed by AFA for specific applications. Staff members are familiar with transportation related data bases and have had considerable experience with both local area and regional travel patterns and the supporting transporta- tion infrastructure. Examples of the firm's areas of exper- tise are as follows: Land Use/Transportation Planning AFA is highly qualified in the area of land use related transportation planning. The firm uses state-of-the-art traffic forecasting procedures in relating land use to transport- ation demand, and the firm's planning experi- ence ranges from detailed local area applica- tions to comprehensive regional studies. Circulation Analysis Circulation analyses are one of AFA's specialties, with applications ranging from General Plan Circulation Element preparation to specific studies addressing existing and/or future transportation needs. EIR Traffic Analysis A significant amount of AFA's traffic analysis work is directed towards EIR prepara- tion. The firm is well experienced in the re- quirements of such studies and has partici- pated in many successful EIR preparation efforts. Roadway Design The firm has an in-house design group with experience in various aspects of roadway design. Signal System Design AFA's design group is well experienced in signal system design, and has completed numerous design plans ranging from single intersections to large areawide systems. Traffic Operations Analysis and Planning Traffic operation evaluations are a major area of AFA's expertise, with applica- tions ranging from system -wide analyses to construction zone planning. Transportation System Management The firm has prepared Transportation System Management Plans for a variety of existing and future developments. RESUME JOE E. FOUST Principal SUMMARY: Mr. Foust is co-founder of Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA), and prior to establishment of the firm, was the principal owner of JEF Engineering. Mr. Foust has designed and directed the preparation of plans for many traffic engineering projects, including traffic signal installation. He has also prepared studies and reports covering a wide range of traffic engineering activities such as impact studies of highway improvement, impacts of proposed development, traffic operations studies, channelization and signing studies, and computerized traffic control systems, as well as performing traffic signal system studies. In addition to traffic operations, Mr. Foust has had considerable experience in parking and lighting studies. This includes economic feasibility, determination of best design concept and the influence on functional design of annual maintenance and operational costs. Formerly, Mr. Foust was Head of the Traffic and Transportation Department of a large Los Angeles metropolitan based firm. Before that, Mr. Foust was the Head of the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Division for the City of Santa Ana, a position held for over five years. While with Santa Ana, he was involved with a variety of transportation projects including creation of the OCTD Multi -modal terminal in the downtown area. Prior to Santa Ana, he held the position of Project Manager/Traffic Engineer for VTN Consulting Engineers and Caltrans. In these positions, he developed experience in all aspects of traffic engineering from design through and including fiscal management. Local/regional work includes active participation in the area of operations, design, transportation planning, and local/regional funding institutions. Most recently, Mr. Foust has been a member of the OCTD Technical Advisory Commission (TAC) and Chairman of the Orange County Transportation Commission's TAC. EXPERIENCE: Mr. Foust has considerable experience in preparation of traffic signal plans, having directly designed or supervised over 1,000 new installations and modifications. Federal Hichwav Administration Experience Mr. Foust has been heavily involved in several different FHWA funding programs, including the current ISTEA. This experience includes preparation of applications during calls for projects up to and including preparation of final EXPERIENCE - continued Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) complying with FHWA and Caltrans requirements. The various programs Mr. Foust has participated in are Traffic Operations Programs to Improve Capacity and Safety, Hazard Elimination and Safety, Intelligent Vehicle Systems, Motorist Information Systems and Surveillance, and Pavement and Roadway Rehabilitation, among others. FETSIM Projects Mr. Foust has considerable knowledge and experience in the use of the TRANSYT computer model. He routinely utilizes the model for both optimization of signal timing and as an analytical tool. As Project Manager, he utilized TRANSYT-717 to analyze computer runs in the performance of Fuel Efficient Traffic Signal Management (FETSIM) projects for the following cities: • Bell • Garden Grove • Huntington Beach • Long Beach • Pasadena Additional Studies Mr. Foust has extensive experience in the preparation of traffic circulation and transportation planning studies. These studies involve TSM/Transit options, parking management, residential traffic control, and the integration of operational traffic engineering with regional travel modeling and forecasting. Examples of recently completed studies include: • Michelson Drive Residential Traffic Control Study, Irvine, • Blackmer Area Residential Traffic Control Study, Garden Grove • Palm -Harbor Redevelopment Parking and Circulation Study, Garden Grove • Transportation Assessment Fee Feasibility Study, Palm Springs • Peninsula Center Office Parking Management Study, Rolling Hills Estates • Palos Verdes Parking and Circulation Study, Rancho Palos Verdes • South Coast Plaza Area Transportation Study, Joint Effort: OCTC, OCTD,City of Costa Mesa and City of Santa Ana • Santa Ana/Orange Residential Traffic Control Plan, Santa Ana/Orange • High Flow Arterial Concept Feasibility Study, OCTC • Ocean Front Boardwalk Feasibility Study, Newport Beach • University Drive Extension Deletion Study, Orange County EDUCATION: Purdue University B.S. (Civil Engineering), 1965 Purdue University M.S. (Transportation and Civil Engineering), 1967 Registered Civil Engineer, California No. 20258 Registered Traffic Engineer, California No. 854 MEMBER: Institute of Transportation Engineers Orange County Traffic Engineers Council; Chairman, 1979 DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES COMPANY BACKGROUND The firm of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA) was formed by Mr. Surender Dewan and Mr. Walter Lundin after many years of experience in the civil engineering and construction industry. Together they provide to the County of Orange almost fifty years of experience in the design and construction of municipal, residential and commercial projects. We have been very fortunate to have developed long-lasting relationships in numerous communities, including Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, Diamond Bar, South Gate, Anaheim, Baldwin Park, Cerritos and San Dimas, as well as the County of Los Angeles. These relationships are based on our commitment to always provide the best and most comprehensive service in a timely and cost-effective manner. DLA provides a full realm of services to various clients for their street improvement and new roadway design projects. Our staff has been responsible for preliminary and final plans, specifications and estimates, projects and contract administration, construction observation, right-of-way engineering, field and construction surveying, pavement evaluation and rehabilitation, alignment studies, bicycle roadway systems, environmental impact studies, street lighting plans, landscape architecture, construction traffic control plans, bid documents, and preparation of as -constructed drawings. Our staff is also familiar with government funding requirements such as Community Development Block Grants, Federal Aid Urban, Housing and Urban Development, Local Public Works Act Bill, Housing and Community Development Administration, and Arterial Highway Financing Programs, ISTEA, and Measure "M". DLA is staffed with registered civil engineers, designers, construction observers, contract administrators and surveyors, and specialists in transportation, building and safety. DLA is uniquely qualified to respond to the diverse needs of our clientele. SURENDER M. DEWAN, P.E. PROJECT ASSIGNMENT: Project Manager EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Delhi University, 1970 Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Washington University, 1978 ACTIVE REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer, California - RCE 34559 Civil Engineer, Nevada - RCE 11221 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: 1994 -Present 1978-1994 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND: Principal, DLA Division Manager, DGA Consultants, Inc. Mr. Dewan, Principal of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA), has over 29 years of professional experience in the design of Public Works projects. Mr. Dewan is responsible for performing and/or coordinating engineering design and other related technical services including project management; preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, design, and evaluation of major street improvement projects, including numerous projects involving rubberized asphalt. Mr. Dewan has served as Project Manager on numerous municipal projects: • Arrow Highway Street Resurfacing and Restoration Project - San Dimas • 1996-1997 CDBG Street Renovation Project - Baldwin Park • Baldwin Park Boulevard Improvements - Baldwin Park • 32nd Street/Newport Boulevard Rehabilitation - Newport Beach • Firestone Boulevard Improvements - South Gate • Southern Avenue Improvements - South Gate • Ambushers and Meadowglen Street Improvements- Diamond Bar • Brea Canyon Road and Brea Canyon Cut-off Street Improvements - Diamond Bar • Bloomfield Avenue Improvements - Cerritos • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements, Grand Ave. to State Route 60 - Diamond Bar • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements, Palomino to Temple - Diamond Bar • Sunset Crossing Improvements - Diamond Bar • Brookhurst Street/Trask Avenue Intersection Improvements - Garden Grove. • 183rd Street Improvements - Cerritos • 166th Street Improvements - Cerritos • Norwalk Boulevard Improvements - Cerritos • Katella Avenue, State College Blvd. to 57 Freeway Improvements - Anaheim • State College Blvd., Orangewood Ave. to Katella Ave. Improvements - Anaheim WALTER F. LUNDIN, P.E. PROJECT ASSIGNMENT: Quality Control and Specifications EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1977 Masters of Business Administration, National University, 1989 ACTIVE REGISTRATION: Registered Civil Engineer, California Certificate 44453 Professional Engineer, Hawaii License Number PE -5666 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: 1994 -Present Principal, DLA 1989-1994 Construction Manager, FHP, Inc. 1977-1984 Contracting Officer, U.S. Navy PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND: Mr. Lundin, Principal of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA), has over 20 years experience in quality control and construction management of roadway and drainage projects. Within Mr. Lundin's quality control experience he has been responsible for constructibility review of plans and specifications, development and implementation of contractor quality control programs, and final acceptance of completed work. In the area of construction management, Mr. Lundin has been responsible for obtaining and evaluating bids, reviewing contractor qualifications, coordinating contractor's work with the client, reviewing requests for clarification, negotiating and approving change orders, approving requests for payment, coordinating inspections of work, final acceptance of work, and review of as -built plans. Recent projects on which Mr. Lundin provided design and construction services include: • South Laguna Beach Storm Drain - Laguna Beach • Orange Fair Lane Storm Drain Improvements - Anaheim • 1996-1997 CDBG Street Renovation Project - Baldwin Park • Baldwin Park Boulevard Improvements - Baldwin Park • Sunset Crossing Road Improvements - Diamond Bar • Southern Avenue Improvements - South Gate • Firestone Boulevard Improvements - South Gate • Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase I - South Gate • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements - Diamond Bar • Grand Avenue Improvements - Diamond Bar • Slurry Seal Area V and VI - Diamond Bar LIST OF REFERENCES Additional information regarding the professional capabilities of Dewan, Lundin & Associates can be obtained by contacting the present and former clients listed below. We urge you to contact these references regarding our record of performance, quality of work, and ability to meet time schedules. Mr. Bill Patapoff City Engineer (949) 644-3321 Mr. Jim Biery Director of Public Works (323) 563-9537 Mr. Bob Kellison Project Coordinator (714) 965-4400 Mr. Ralph Harp Principal Civil Engineer (714) 765-5176 Mr. Arjan Idnani Engineering Supervisor (626) 960-4011 City of Newport Beach City of South Gate City of Fountain Valley City of Anaheim City of Baldwin Park STREET IMPROVEMENTS DLA provides a full realm of services to various clients for their street improvement and new roadway design projects. Ourstaffhas been responsible for preliminary and final plans, specifications and estimates, projects and contract administration, construction observation, right-of-wayengineering, field and construction surveying, pavement evaluation and rehabilitation, alignment studies, bicycle roadway systems, environmental impact studies, street lighting plans, landscape architecture, construction traffic control plans, bid documents, and preparation of as -constructed drawings. Our staff is also familiar with government funding requirements such as Community Development Block Grants, Federal Aid Urban, Housing and Urban Development, Local Public Works Act Bill, Housing and Community Development Administration, and Arterial Highway Financing Programs, ISTEA, and Measure "M". STREET IMPROVEMENT EXPERIENCE Listed below are some of the major street improvement projects in progress or recently completed by our firm. Client: City of Anaheim Project: KATELLA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Description: Katella Avenue from State College Boulevard to the 57 Freeway. The project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, reconstruction of curb and gutter, construction of landscaped median divider, signage and striping plans and traffic control plans. Construction Cost: $800,000 Year Completed: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Eddy Jan, Associate Engineer (714) 746-5176 Client: City of Anaheim Project: STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Description: State College Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to Katella Avenue. The project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, reconstruction of curb and gutter, construction of landscaped median divider, signage and striping plans and traffic control plans. Construction Cost: $1 Million Year Completed: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Eddy Jan, Associate Engineer (714) 746-5176 Client: City of South Gate Project: TOWNE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS Description: Street improvements on all four legs of Firestone Boulevard/Garfield Avenue. The project includes• reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing, construction of landscaped median divider, parkway improvements, installation of traffic signals, signage and striping plans. Construction Cost: $650,000 Year Completed: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Tom Melendrez, Associate Engineer (323) 563-9582 Client: City of Cerritos Project: 183RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS Description: 183`d Street from Shoemaker Avenue to Marquardt Avenue. The project included construction of landscaped and irrigated medians on 183`d Street and rehabilitation of existing pavement using rubberized asphalt, construction of drainage improvements, signage, and striping plans. Total length 1.0 miles. Construction Cost: $1 Million Contact Person: Mr. Vince Brar, Director of Public Works (562) 860-0311 Client: City of Baldwin Park Project: BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Description: Baldwin Park Boulevard from Francisquito Avenue to Merced Avenue. Project included the reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway using rubberized asphalt, signage and striping plans, etc. Total length of project 3/4 mile. Construction Cost: $500,000 Year Completed: 1997 Contact Person: Mr. Arjan Idnani, Supervising Engineer (626) 960-4011 Client: City of Baldwin Park Project: 1996-1997 CDBG STREET RENOVATION PROJECT Description: The project consists of design of street improvements including design survey for various streets in the City of Baldwin Park. Construction Cost: $1 Million Completion Date: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Arjan Idnani, Supervising Engineer (626) 960-4011 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD Description: Diamond Bar Boulevard from Grand Avenue to State Route 60. Project included reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway including rubberized asphalt, signage and striping plans, etc. Total length 1.75 miles. Construction Cost: $1 Million Year Completed: 1996 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: AMBUSHERS AND MEADOWGLEN IMPROVEMENTS Description: Ambushers Street between Woodhill Circle and 20914 Ambushers Street, and Meadowglen Road between Ironhorse Canyon and Silver Rain Drive. Project included street and storm drain plans, striping and signage plans, specifications. Construction Cost: $350,000 Year Completed: 1998 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD Description: Diamond Bar Boulevard from Palomino Drive to Temple Avenue. This project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, signage and striping. Construction Cost: $950,000 Year Completed: 1998-99 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Description: Sunset Crossing Road from Golden Springs Drive to Diamond Bar Boulevard. This project included reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, signage and striping plans. Total length 1.25 miles. Construction Cost: $350,000 Year Completed: 1996 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Cerritos Project: 166TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS Description: 166th Street Improvemeos, fro ementsBfromfield Avenue Del Amo AvenNorwue oallortherly City Norwalk Boulevard Imp limits. Total length 1.6 miles. Construction Cost: $500,000 Contact Person: Mr. Rash Syed, Associate Engineer (562) 860-0311 Client: City of Garden Grove Project: BROOKHURST STREET/TRA SK AVENUE INTERSECTION abilitation of the intersection with Description: The project consisted of reconstruction/reh fabric, rubberized asphalt, additional turn lanes, signal modifications, etc. Construction Cost: $300,000 Contact Person: Mr. Navin Maru, Associate Engineer (714) 741-5184 SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES -1999 Dewan, Lundin & Associates HOURLY CHARGES FOR PERSONNEL: Project Manager ........................................... $85.00 ...... Project Engineer ................ ........... ........ $75.00 $60.00 Design Engineer ..... .................................... $60.00 CADD Designer ........................................... $45.00 Senior Drafter ................... ..................... ..... $55.00 Senior Plan Checker................ . . ................. Construction Administrator .... . ............................$56.00 Construction Observer......................................$48.00 Building Official............................................$65.00 Building Plan Check Engineer................................$60.00 Building Plan Examiner $60.00 Building Inspector .......................................... $50.00 Two -Man Field Party ...................................... $130.00 Three -Man Field Party$185.00 Office Survey Analyst ....... ..................... ....... $50.00 Word Processor ............. ............................. $35.00 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES: Out-of-pocket expenses (blueprints, reproductions, printing, etc.) will be billed at cost plus 15%. SUBCONTRACTS: A 15% fee for administration, coordination and handling will be added to subcontracted services. All of the above rates are subject to revision. CCCCCCCCC TTTT CCCCCCCCC TTTT CCCC TTTTTTTTTTTTTT CCCC TTTTTTTTTTTTTT CCCCCCCCC TTTT CCCCCCCCC TTTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT CALTRANS Certification Number: CT -027313 Certifying Agency: CALTRANS Expiration Date: 02-01-2000 Contact Person: SURENDER DEWAN Attention: SURENDER DEWAN DEWAN, LUNDIN 8 AS 12377 LEWIS ST 8101 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92640 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Business Enterprise Program PO BOX 942874 - MS 79 SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001 (916) 227-9599 ASIAN IND --- * CERTIFIED PROGRAMS --- MALE DBE SMBE PARTNERSHIP -----Post an ruoaac vaew----- (714) 740-8840 CERTIFICATION MUST BE RENEWED 120 DAYS PRIOR TO EXPIRATION DATE. --- It is your responsibility to: - Apply for Recertification an a Timely Basis. - Review this notification for accuracy and notify Caltrans in writing of any necessary changes. --Preferred WORK LOCATIONS ----- 19 LOS ANGELES 30 ORANGE 33 RIVERSIDE 36 SAN BERNARDINO 37 SAN DIEGO * Only certified DBE's may be utilized to meet Federally funded contract goals. Only certified SMBE or SWBE's may be utilized to meet State funded contract goals. Only certified CFMBE or CFWBE's may be utilized to meet Century Freeway contract goals. -----Preferred WORK CATEGORIES and BUSINESS Types----- C8700 CONSULTANT SE C8705 DESIGN SE C8710 ENGINEERING SE C8720 CIVIL ENGINEERING SE C8721 RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER SE C8760 SURVEYOR SE C8765 DRAFTING SE C8770 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SE * Only certified DBE's may be utilized to meet Federally funded contract goals. Only certified SMBE or SWBE's may be utilized to meet State funded contract goals. Only certified CFMBE or CFWBE's may be utilized to meet Century Freeway contract goals. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 22, 1999 FROM: Terrence L Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Ordinance No. 14 (1999) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property." SUMMARY: To facilitate the safe use of pedestrian walkways on private property, there is a need to prohibit wheeled toys (rollerblades, rollerskates, skateboards, or any similar device). The utilization of wheeled toys on private property, where pedestrians are, creates conflict and an unsafe environment. The recommended Ordinance amends Chapter 10.28 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code to add new Sections 10.28.030, 10.28.040, and 10.28.050. These new Sections prohibit wheeled toys on any private property where a property owner elects to post a sign prohibiting rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity. On December 21, 1999, the City Council approved the first reading, by title only. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 14 (1999) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property." LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification X Ordinance(s) X Other _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed XYes —No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? XYes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A —Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No 5, Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No REVIEWED BY: �l Terrence L. Belanger �; ` Anne M. Haraksin City Manager Sr. Administrative Assistant CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 14 (1999) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property." ISSUE STATEMENT: Shall the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 14 (1999) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property." RECOMMENDATION: b title only, It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, y y, and adopt Ordinance No. 14 (1999) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Regulating Wheeled Toys on Private Property." FISCAL IMPACT: Possible increase in fine and forfeitures revenue. BACKGROUND/DIS CUSSION : To facilitate the safe use of pedestrian walkways on private property, there is a need to prohibit wheeled toys (rollerblades, rollerskates, skateboards, or any similar device). The utilization of wheeled toys on private property, where pedestrians are, creates conflict and an unsafe environment. The recommended Ordinance amends Chapter 10.28 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code to add new Sections 10.28.030, 10.28.040, and 10.28.050. These new Sections prohibit wheeled toys on any private property where a property owner elects to post a sign prohibiting rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to post and maintain all signs. Such prohibition shall apply to the property or area so designated only after the property or area has been posted with signs in plain view at all entrances to the property area. These signs will be 17" x 22" with lettering not less than one inch in height. The signs shall read as follows: "Rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity is prohibited by Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 10.28.040. Any violation is punishable in accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Chapter 1.04." 1/4/2000 Page 2 With the addition of Municipal Code Chapter 1.04 (Penalties -Civil Remedies), all of the Diamond Bar Municipal Codes are subject to enforcement by the Enforcement Official. Section 1.04.020 defines an Enforcement Official as "A person, who has Penal Code Citation Certification Training, designated by the City Manager as an Enforcement Official or any member of the Sheriff's Department who is authorized to enforce the provisions of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code." Therefore, Section 10.28.040 (Prohibition -Restrictions) will be enforced by the Enforcement Official, and the violator will be subject to fines set forth in Resolution No. 99-77, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Establishing Penalties for All Violations of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code." The City has received a letter from M & H Property Management, requesting the establishment of a Skateboard Ordinance to regulate wheeled toys on private property. The City of Chino Hills adopted a similar Ordinance on March 14, 1995. According to M & H Property Management, the Country Hills Towne Center has continuously experienced problems with individuals on wheeled toys. They state that the individuals create not only a daily nuisance and potential hazard to tenants and patrons, but have also contributed to criminal activity on the property. On December 21, 1999, the City Council approved the first reading, by title only, of the Ordinance. Attachments: "A" Letter from M & H Property Management LLC "B" Diamond Bar Municipal Code pertaining to skateboard regulations "C" California Vehicle Code pertaining to skateboard regulations "D" City of Chino Hills' Skateboard Ordinance Report Prepared By: Anne Haraksin ORDINANCE NO. 14 (1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULATING WHEELED TOYS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHEREAS, the public health, safety and welfare require that the use of wheeled toys be prohibited where not consistent with the use of the property as determined by the owner of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Chapter 10.28 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add thereto new Sections 10.28.030, 10.28.040 and 10.28.050 to read as follows: 10.28.030 Definitions For purposes of this Chapter, certain words and terms are defined as follows: a. Private property shall mean any property held by private individuals or interests which is used primarily for business, commercial, office space, business park, religious, multi- family or recreational purposes. This shall also include the parking facilities for these "private property" areas. b. Public property shall mean any property owned or maintained by the City of Diamond Bar within the geographical boundaries of the City of Diamond Bar. Wheeled toys shall refer to rollerblades, rollerskates, skateboards, or any similar device. d. Rollerblades or rollerskates shall mean any footwear, or device which may be attached to the foot or footwear, to which wheels are attached. Skateboard shall mean a board of any material, which has wheels attached to it and which is propelled or moved by human, gravitational, or mechanical power. 10.28.040 Prohibition — Restrictions a. No person shall utilize, ride upon or otherwise move about on any rollerblades, rollerskates, or skateboards or similar devices on any private property where a sign has been posted prohibiting rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity. b. Any private property owner may elect to prohibit rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity by posting signage in accordance with Section 10.28.050 of this Code. 10.28.050 Posting of Signs Prior to the enforcement of the prohibition on rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity, the area so designated shall be posted with signs which provide substantially as follows: "Rollerblading, rollerskating, skateboarding or similar activity is prohibited by Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 10.28.040. Any violation is punishable in accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Chapter 1.04." Such prohibition shall apply to the property or area so designated once the property or area has been posted with signs in plain view at all entrances to the property or area. These signs will be 17" x 22" with lettering not less than one inch in height. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to post and maintain all signs prohibiting the above actions. Section 2 The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of the Ordinance and to cause it to be published or posted as required by law. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, portions, or phrases of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase without regard to whether any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of January-, 2000. Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar , do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, held on the 21st day of December, 1999, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, held on the 4th day of Januar 2000, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar WLA e4y=9 PROPERTY MANAGEI,t LLC February 26, 2999 The Honorable Mayo Wen Chang and Diaatond Bar City Council CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21660 E. Copley, SAt loo Diamond Bar, CaMOMia 91765 j 2711 W. imperial fth` ,ay Suite, Etna, Gabfomia 906'31 Fh: (W) 691-59% Fax (50 691-2171 M PROPOSAL FOR AN URGENCY ORDINANCE IN TM CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAMNG WAD TOYS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND C MAIN PUBLIC FROPE M Dear Mayor Clung and Council Members This letter shall serve as our request for consideration of the ectiiblishaa - i of an u raxy ordinance in the city of Diamond Bar to regulate wheded toys (i.e., skateboards, rollexHades, roner•skates, etc.). We are a real estate bolding corporation based ant of Sart Fra MW wilt offices throughout Southam California. These holdings consist of AKTP erg cabers, of which one of them is located in Diamond Bar. The Country HRk Towne Cezaa, located at the south end of Diamond Bar, has carmamunsly experienced Problems with lmxdles and occasionally adults on skateboards and roUablades. These individuals create not only a dally nuisance and potential hazard to our tBORns and patrons m the shopping center, but have also contiftated to eowanal activity on the property- We mot ovErstate the severity of tbis issue. The incidents kteease with the c d*nation of xlical aged children ort vacation and good weather. The Walrmt5her ff's Station does what it can to help, but without a city ordinance, thea hands are somewhat tied as to what wet ant of the law they inn go. The wrifart of the t nue is and patrons to the shopping oe1 are of inawst priority- We endeavor in mairw&dng a safe and comfortable eavftm= nit for all who work and situp at Country HBIs Towne Cotter. Therefore, we are requesting cora anon of an ordinance such as tine ordinance established in the City of C hmo, Hjus. For yaw convenience, a copy of Chico His Ordinance No. 62 is enclosed along with a copy of a news cl4n= g front the Chute Hills News regu%b ng sbw rss. Also, please Sad outer mise. documentation refu---1-4g this issue. FW 2 mayor Qxre & Gonnal Membra city of wand Bar February 26,1999 of fts vary "Me- B you We would gmtlY fmy7ea& MySeU or GaryTh0'cm at562-691-996, zed forth= b4ormatm, 8-30 a.m. to 5:00 pm Moaiday tltrn �Y, M,,* you in advaQ+ce kw Y=atian and we look forward to hea�8 from yo'u- M & H PROPERTY T L an Behalf of M do H RealtyPartllm'$ IL Sandra Z- wooer' Asst Property Mgr. //s1'`' cc: Terry Belanger, Cjl5'MWOW, D Bar, CA Gary Thomas, PM. Mg., M & H Fx0p rty Mgmt TIM Hoak P,4 mv- M do H Property MSML VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC § 10.28.020 often than once a week of every bicycle received in the course of business by him since his last report. In such reports he shall describe each such bicycle and give the license number thereof, if any. In addition, he shall supply such other information as the sheriff may require. (b) This section requires such a report even if the receipt of such bicycle also has been reported pursuant to division 5 of chapter 5.120. (Ord. No. 14(1989), §.2(15.84.110), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.24.120. Bicycle dealers and other businesses; holding period before sale or disposal of bicycle& An auctioneer, auto wrecker, foundry, pawnbroker, secondhand dealer, junk dealer or bicycle dealer receiving any bicycle in the course of business shall not sell, transfer, deliver, destroy or alter any such bicycle until 14 days after its receipt has been reported to the sheriff. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.84.120), 6-27.89) Sec. 10.24.130. Penalty for violation of chapter. Any violation of any of the provisions of this chapter by any person shall be an infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $5.00. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.84.130), 6-27-89) CHAPTER 10.28. SKATEBOARDS AND ROLLER SKATES* Sec. 10.28.010. Skateboards; prohibited on greater than three -percent grade. No person shall ride on or propel any skateboard, as defined in section 10.00.020, on any road, street, highway, lane or alley which has a grade in excess of three percent, nor shall any person ride on or propel any skateboard on any road, street, highway, lane or alley in excess of ten miles per hour. (Ord. No. 14(1989),. § 2(15.54.010), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.28.020. Roller skates; prohibited on greater than three -percent grade. No person shall, while wearing roller skates or other similar wheeled devices attached to his feet, travel on any road, street, highway, lane or alley which has a grade in excess of three percent, nor shall any person, while wearing roller skates or other similar wheeled devices attached to his feet, travel on any road, street, highway, lane or alley in excess of ten mules per hour. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.54.020), 6.27-89) Cross referenoes—Entertainment generally, ch. 5.44; funeral escorts, ch. 5.56; fire safety, tit. 16. *Cross references—Charitable solicitations, ch. 5.28; entertainment generally, ch. 5.44; bicycles, ch. 10.24. State law references—Authority to regulate use of skateboards, Vehicle Code § 21967; authority to regulate use of roller skates, Vehicle Code § 21969. CD10:47 0$1984 —828 Div. 11 predominantly white cane (with or without a red tip), or using a guide dog, OW have the right-of-way, and the driver of any vehicleapproachingthis pedestrian, who fall# to yield the right-of-way, this Minor toet4ke all ,bis guilt- reasonably necessary precautions to avoid injury Pad misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine of not less than five hundred dollen ($600) nor more than one prosecution underany other applicrs able provision oflaw. section or both. This shall not preclude Amended Cb. 1149, eau. Ina. a9wuve January I. 1994. Whlb Canes 91964. No p�t�. other than those totally or partially blind, shall carry or use on any highwy or in a4 public building. public facility, or other public place, a predominantly white cane (with or without a rod tip). Added Cd 461, &W& Is& t Wave Nerember 13, 110B., . 9 DoffnNA M used In Sections 9 1995 and 21964, -Wind,- `totally blind," and 'partially blind,' mean having central visual acuity not to exceed 9012200 in the yew e7e. with corrected lenses, as measured by the Snellen test, or visual acuity greater than 90/900, but with a limitation in the field of vision such that the widest diameter of the visual field subtends an angle not greater than 20 degrees. Aedd Ch. 461, eat. 1910. W.,. Nevemtar 16, 1M pod &Wbn M Blayela Lana 91966. No pedestrian shall proceed along a bicycle path or lane where there is an adjacent adequate pedestrian facility. ;81: 61aat. 1976. Modhe Jenaary 1-1977- Viabboo;81: Pr~10M 'r 91967. Except as provided inflection 91969, a local authority may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution prohibiting orwirestricting persons from riding or propelling skateboards on highway@. A•4e�ded Ch 1164, sofa 1107. gw�e Ja@uery 1, 1910. SMMboard PM*&W sidewalk, �,� �1969�. No motorized skateboard may be propelled on any 1'oa4wA, or any other part of a highway or on any bikeway, bicycle path or trAloquertrisn trail, or biking or recreational trail. Added Gh x76, eat. ts77. gNeed , Jaly 6.19771,1' Yeme afan uraena dwr. Local Rsguistim of Raftr f3MOV 91999. A local authority may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance i'tt{ldath g persons engaged In roller skating on a highway, sidewalk, or Added Ch. 146, eat. 196L M icdv§ January 1.196:. CH(1P'1'RR 8. TURNING AND SMPPIN() AND TURNING SIGNALS lhanhl>1 Upon a H19hMY 29100, gxcel q provided in Section 92100.5 or 29101, the driver of any ;' vehide intending to diva upon a highway shall do so as follows: (a) Right Turns, Both the approach for a right-hand turn and a right - band tarn shall be made as doss as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of aha roadway except: Di t!i L) poll a nAguway— direction which terminates aL an traffic in both directions, the driver of a vehicle in the middle lane may vera right into any lane lawfully available to traffic moving in that direction upon i the roadway being entered. (2) When a right-hand turn is made from_a One-way highway at an intersection, a driver shall approach the turn as fnprovided in subdivielion (a) rovide el to traffic moving and shall complete the turn in any lane lawfiy in that direction upon the roadway being entered. (5) Upon a highway having an additional lane or lance marked for a right turn by appropriate signs or markings, the driver of a vehicle may tarn right from may lane designated and marked for that turning movement. (bio 111rna. The approach for • left tarn shall be made as close sa practicable to the leMand edge of the extreme h&baed lane or portion of the roadway lawfully available to traffic moving in the diraetion of travel of such vehicle and, when turning at an interseedea, do left turn shall not be made beton entering the interseetln. After entering the intersection. the deft tarn to be made in that o an to leave the interactioa, direetion upon the roadway y (ane lawfully being erste available trac moving (1)SMOMa ha three marked lanes for traffic moving in one i (1) Upon highway ring _ direction which kaI'MilkatIMM at an intersecting tion( he driver of a vehicle� Adie � mcconimodmft traffic in both di:ectioaa, lett Into any lane law" available to traffic moving In that direction upon the roadway being entered. Amended Ch. 741. aide. 19M gaid{re January 1. 1103. tj-Turn if COntnofted hastow"On 99100.5. No driver @hall make a U-turn at an intersection controlled by official traffic signal exceptem providad in Section 914519 and thea only from the far lefthand tone that is lawfully available to traffic moving in the � ■ U-turnon of travel from which the tom is commeniced. No driver shall make at an intersection controlled by official traffic control devices except from the for lafttund )ane that is lawfully available to tragic moving in the direction of travel from which the turn is commenced - Amended 06.700, WAIL 1104_ ffiect a Janaery 1,1$66. fisyuisom of Tw"s of htisnscflb e 99101. (a) The Department of Transportation or local authorities les ,aspect to highways under their mail jurisdielio°s, may ruse official tral8c control devices to be placed or Greeted within or adjacent to intersections to regulate or prohibit turning movements at such intersections. intersection notice of are (b) When turning movements arequi d at an such requirement ,hull be given by erection Of a sign, unions an additional clearly marked traffic lane is provided for the approach to the 'turanal ' movement, in which event notice as applicable to such additional traffic lane shall be given by any official traffic control device. (c) when t- or left-hand turns are prohibited at an intersection notice of such prohibition shall be given by erection of a sign. c (d) When official traffic control devices aro plaoed ea required in subdivisions (b) or Cc), it shell be unlawful for any driver of a vehicle to \ -_ disobey the directions uw rcial traffic trot devices. 41) • �• •: r "r .,• yr r..;t+� • ra. tl-. C'; =�f`y •f 1. t: f �1' • - r"7" oa Mr •' „_� • y �mcu of the City of Chino Caligo=iSills. State of 1be C�.ty as follaer.- a, ozdaias that iiSBitEAS the pcbZic health, - s am sistent xi:h the use of vbMled toys be � the ops of Prop,'I - the s* of the � � at the CstY of coo �� does SECiZO1Q 1. City herabY find. detezmiae &nd decINCethat- ""that this a�sd� u =rim sa 2. 17u City i �sY the rZ �d setY� ens of UrgencprasesoatLM of the Pic P�Of mi imitis bxvP- � auras► about the ddaaa9 � rol.las'b3.ad t tie ty and the likelib�ood axacebo�-VJ =ahin serious �rities a=e is � tbat tbasseg�� that such acu �,s - The City oo�mci l ozd IMt therefore injury to that to are �amd czivesmsztiY is order to Prevent sai'nY beCAMMS PezS°US - sections 6.14.301 INdsair-i= 6.14302 phi ion - ��� 6.14.303 RMOWtsons. For pa=poses of this Mapter• certain -iaed es ial3.oes = .roads atd tezms ase �Y be A by private mall mean nay per- p for A. eft�V is �rict� ash � individuals OV office spsoQ. This WMIri-family or rets: i tb+ese 'P�vate sba11 also include t10 P axe". sba71 mean ssty pscD�y owmd c ued - jeugrapbi by rrb � fych3,o�o s t2u of the City X"Is . tea shall mesa am toot roar. oz C. 7to11a�1ad�as �� to the foot or footwear, to device Whir-h be vhi, ase attadbed- 0jWzbWcE VD. D. Slcatabcard mil beard of anyvBtarial is i=WeLl" ormonrad by _ bich b" D Vbal1S atLiC�dto LU md aiC� POier- • nits�aaa, vi=i al' Or aais in ac==da=e and z"bject to P to Shau l gz, for any Pe °n with Se. ic=vide. 6.p= o ccba� a01°a�°1°a%Sir prices mly ut#?izt, rids.uPaaat rol.le • roU=W3r&r-". � WI-ach a Sign bis be= on =y plc vara P—. S1a�td�oq, awl and Whieft bei _ pr sudj= c F Isset forth by �QVi j. �Zs Or - - - operty is not Ax r�zd o" , 'aat- A. If rsu � the pasez am►y �igMtion of alto Lj�lleift �r- Wil= ag atoll sx& U* or Similar hcti'rity Area - familY' w--� Piny g . if the PI z s malro men the t�� s>>ai1 nittm ?-iOn rithi /36�,t� of the submit a deSigmm Of unitsoa tba Ptd iitbasdue. or � aad the the the ,mitten =Mont �,� cs� � hits ar Y,er designted The cir C �, sat fords in C. am, by raseiat�, A and P of rais seet1 . subsaetio�s nate prapetty as a so � The desi9cate =y pri ar similar Activtzy-. p,�,lsssk&t"V and .� tames when city Gaeacil.. ohm, des1�e � and corder the P�� of sucb apprcgri.� stsm"M in ~ with Section 6_14- Chapter- SbaLl Cam noticx of City Coes in asY D. 1'ha of this aPplzcsr.�°� to be Pablsshda prior to r,=,zwlati= at least tea YS C3r,aty C� �s ccs. -2- 6_14.304 tic Ce cil "Y, by �=1r be - � Y ss a No The tY __ as Activity dray, s%ae+ra33c• lat. cmqser the Rolls lad Skateboas' i, dssi to �h Area -of City Signa" with 6_i4.305 of this Cbsptet_ Pr1at to the Of the s l 9 Or t�3,csLY� CDa�� �1 asfollows: be �Lefl vith signs rich P�� �ig er simiUz Wr •Ral,letblsdinge Simis pzdi %i X 1s �.eipal C� vi is; by ° moble by acti tY So=ian 6.14.302. AW � mos 3 $ S100.00 for tbt fir==0• s� i 3 Shcri£f q-Dt5` or szm so As.�. ti•t zzi0n � apply to PriO vi= si9m t•.Rt such Pz� az azea mm bem P�� _ M2ese �1gnated eats � p to tie or a%e&- 1410M vie+ at a3.1 SELL Asn e� inch is i r` P will be 17' z 22' rrich lettaaci of the veva p"41T os siie�jtes be the ti�3- ten=t (s) xto pot and min aby ll si9es Pr�`zbi City CMWLI a" IfiatiW—Moluti.On, ista � toes fK th'e r MLVC � Ot R,sll irskatin3 • 3,01 applis,�i for xo zbe City Wj' "E"L= and Zn addit1� T31@ t+ity COQ �Yvpsag. P Areas-- t this �� _ fees£ics� co_ the �oszs POS the asses design' p�'sa`a u an dltia l Uvi spa s c i, las is imf mctt m v c,at MS g�11 be punisbed c« - thil Code. S@ctiaa 1.01_120 � t ung Deviom dQsi9�• a the bandi�c P� �'. fns tbs tt�a Kaci of �s by this �pzez ons iNgosed sb&II be aMOMted ftaQ the passage Of Sz=ON 3. I�� caua the C2-tobep�-=s2� as this ordinmzmm and �guized by lsv- -3- rt App�flj MW =PTS this a�— day of ` . . APPRAVZD AS TO !t=: 1 C.' OF Fcmm ii OF SM � SSD } C=T OP110 of the City _� t�s��'�— eras .' C�and ice, City Q.esx adz Chun �_ CLty a�Y a z ,rich the co�P a cnrbe —_-- � *ay =.9ss, touori�s z ll �1, tc wit: AlM =SUN= mss: aorml= res: AgSTA�= cxytnIm W � is the �l of Ott � � y 1i,d199a S� Sills City cm0d1 at d dt Toga'= Ste LCL D- ffi�• GI'it . oMail iq f r1le Cs .S �F Grm t233t 14. 19953W _C62 , of rbc City of e4%oiO 8slls. ad� =9ency ear�.�ed= OF OF TM CITY �q cmmm C6 OF Mm C= 4MOZOLITM = TOTS IF nxmmSys mmmm � �= P n= ,Me MVeney Ott a ctbarraszmsI.sr stcacebo zdingF � � as sbop� aa�, and ativities P� wi11 allow Signs to be certain Puw4iti r�� '°'e °1°oca mod iC=iv tti - posted PtheC=y Com by � Crs go- 62 .res �� � G=aharmp following vote:urgency, hyes: md a . Vis. Abw�. ga®e r��• ��"rertY, to= of Oso pO_ i2 is A tified COW of the the �, City of available for "W� fnmj the Office of the City Gino Bibs. 2001 Gxaad Ate• ffilla P W:-_ M ZZ M ■.. "TF pabl,iZh:. Compim,gZ99 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. � l TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 22 1999 FROM: Terrence L Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Ordinance No. 9A(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Ordinance No. 9 (1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." SUMMARY: City Council salaries were established at the time of incorporation pursuant to California Government Code Section 36516. Compensation for City Council Members was established on May 2, 1989, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 9(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." First, Section 2 of the Ordinance needs to be amended to accurately reflect the City's population (58,300). Second, Section 3 needs to be amended in order to increase the compensation amount from $500.00 to $525.00 for City Council Members. Currently, Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9(1989) states that "Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of $500.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group." Since incorporation, the City Council Members' compensation has not been adjusted. On December 21, 1999, the City Council waived full reading and approved the first reading, by title only, of the Ordinance. With the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council Members' salary will be adjusted in December, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 9A(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Ordinance No. 9 (1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification X Ordinance(s) X Other _ Agreement(s) FXTF.RNAT, DNTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A —Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No REVIEW D BY: AUPIV� 04 Terrence L. Bela r Anne M. Haraksin City Manager Sr. Administrative Assistant CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 9A(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Ordinance No. 9 (1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." ISSUE STATEMENT: Shall the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 9A(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Ordinance No. 9 (1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 9A(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Ordinance No. 9 (1989) Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." FISCAL IMPACT: Combined (all five City Council Members for 1 year) compensation increase is $1,500. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: City Council salaries were established at the time of incorporation pursuant to California Government Code Section 36516. Compensation for City Council Members was established on May 2, 1989, with the adoption of Ordinance No. 9(1989) "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Establishing Salaries for Members of the City Council." Section 2 of Ordinance No. 9(1989) states that "The latest estimate of population of the City made by the Secretary of State is approximately 74,115." This recommended Ordinance would amend Section 2 of Ordinance 9(1989) to read: SECTION 2. "The latest estimate of population of the City made by the Secretary of State is approximately 74,1-15 58,300". Currently, Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9(1989) states that "Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of $500.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group." January 4, 2000 Page 2 Pursuant to California Government Code Section 36516(c), "Compensation of Council Members may be increased beyond the amount provided by this section by an ordinance or by an amendment to an ordinance but the amount may not exceed an amount equal to 5 percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in effect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted." This recommended Ordinance would amend Section 3 of Ordinance 9(1989) to read: SECTION 3. "Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of $500.00 $525.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516(c) of the Government Code of the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group." It is recommended that the City Council Members' compensation be adjusted because the compensation has not been adjusted since incorporation. With the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council's salary will be adjusted in December, 2001. Section 36516.5 prohibits against a change in compensation during term of office. On December 21, 1999, the City Council waived full reading and approved the first reading, by title only, of the Ordinance. Attachments: "A" Ordinance No. 9(1989) "B" California Government Code Section 36516 ORDINANCE NO. 9A (1989) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.9 (1989) ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL A. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar amends Ordinance 9(1989) to read as follows: SECTION 1. This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the provisions of Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State of California, authorizing the City Council to provide by ordinance that each member of the City Council shall receive a prescribed salary, the amount of which shall be based upon the population of the City as determined by estimates made by the State Department of Finance. SECTION 2. The latest estimate of population of the City made by the Secretary of State is approximately 58,300. SECTION 3. Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of $525.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516(c) of the Government Code of the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group. SECTION 4. The salaries prescribed in this Ordinance shall be exclusive of any amounts payable to each member of the City Council as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred by a member of the City Council in the performance of official duties for the City. SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be posted within fifteen (15) days after its passage in at least three (3) public locations in the City of Diamond Bar. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4t' day of Januga, 2000. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 21st day of December, 1999, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 4th day of Janu , 2000. Executed this 4th day of January, 2000 at Diamond Bar, California. Lynda Burgess City Clerk t ORDINANCE NO. 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMEHSERSBAR OFESTABLISHING ES FOR COUNCILI A. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the provisions of Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State of California, authorizing the City Council to provide by ordinance that each member of the City Council shall receive a prescribed salary, the amount of which shall be based upon the population of the City as determined by estimates made by the State Department of Finance. SECTION 2. The latest estimate of population of the City made by the Secretary of State is approximately 74,115. SECTION 3. Each member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of 5500.00 per month, as prescribed in Section 36516 of the Government Code of.'the State for cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population group. SECTION 4. The salaries prescribed in this Ordinance shall be exclusive of any amounts payable to each member of the City Council as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred by a member of the City Council in the performance of official duties for the City. SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be posted within fifteen (15) days after its passage in at least three (3) public locations in the City of Diamond Bar. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 1989. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: WERNER, MILLER, FORBING HORCHER and PAPEN NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None �4 a _A�-7%.l Mayor City of Diamond Bar ` I,r-mr,F rA;WFi i , City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 18th day of April, 1989, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 2nd day of May, 1989. Executed this 2nd day of May, 1989 at Diamond Bar, California. GEORGE ASWELL. City Clerk CITY GOVEIM r� " �► M ,NT Title 4 OFFICERS --GENERAL be filled asDiv. 3 any other § 36516 t' filing of statements or reports. 61 Ops.Atty. of a city council incurs for the handicap Gen. 342, 7-26-78. 3. Aandic� ed assistance of others needed b relat- ed Pped council members to travel in the performance of officital dutiescif A California city has authorityxpenda demand fitsor reimbursement of such costs is funds to reimburse as travel expenses those a r ordinance of the u costs which a approved by the city council unless the charter Physically handicapped member 65 Op ordinance f y provides otherwise. § 36515. Councilmen; compensation; filling The compensation of a cityvacancies I § 1. by Stats.1966, 1st Ex. vacancy is the same as that councilman a § 1. appointed or elected to fill a rom former dded (Added b Payable to the member whose office was vacated. ► uncodified statutes afrom Y Stats -1949, C. 79, p, 145, § 1,) ed in 1966 was derived (sem derivation). Derivation: Stats.1883, c. 49 Hlatorlcal Note relating to compensation 1909, c 100, § 1; Stats 1931, c. 132 855; Stats. led by Stats.1949, c, 79 p 1933, c. 516, § 8; Stats.1941, c. 130, § 1. Stats. by Stats.1957, c. 1362, p, 3, c. 1998, p. 4077, ss, i. 286, § 1, wasAk § 36516. Council members; ordinance p. 1287, § 1, the derived from Stat �. providing sal ats190, c. 100, t 193 compensation for council members, muxdCi� salary schedule; D. 190• § 6; Stats. 3 C. crease or decrease pal election; in- >tats.1941, c. 130, p, 1177 (a) A city council may enact an ordinance providing that each member of the city council shall receive a salary, the amount of which shall be deter- s mined by the following schedule: necessary (i) ($)per month In cities up to and including 35,000 in Population, u to and including Y expenses three hundred dollars 300 P P . P 11, 1966.) (2) In cities over 35,000 up to and including50 including four hundred dollars (1400 in Population, up to and (3) In cities over 50 )Per month. including five hundredd of p to and including 75,000 in population, up to and (4) In cities over 75,000 u (1500) Per month. and including six hundred dollars and including 150,000 in population, up to (5) In cities over 15dred u ($600) Per month. and including eight nd hundred dollars (including 250,000 in population, up to (6) In cities over 250,000 )Per month. dollars (11,000 per month. Population, up to and including one thousand stere was no valid ordi- For the purposes of this section the he ltorizing such payments last preceding federal census or Population shall be determined b !ct t of the claimed ex_ the De subsequent census, or estimate validated tby :ct to verification. Al_ Department of Finance. t San Francisco (1975) (b) At any municipal election the :A.3d 866. bers shall receive compensation for servicesnandOf �thetaer city council mem- tion, may be submitted to the electors. mount of compensa- fairany city to pay for the election favor it, all of the council members shall receive the co fair If a majority of the electors voting at Political practices tion specified in the election call. Compensation s council mem council members cur- mperisa- be ng to penalties for late increased beyond the amount provided in this section or decreased below the amount in the same manner. he 627 § 36516 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 (c) Compensation of council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in this section by an ordinance or by an amendment to an ordinance but the amount of the increase may not exceed an amount equal to 5 percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjust- ment of the salary in effect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted. No salary ordinance shall be enacted or amended which provides for auto- matic future increases in salary. (d) Any amounts paid by a city for retirement, health and welfare, and federal social security benefits shall not be included for purposes of determin- ing salary under this section provided the same benefits are available and paid by the city for its employees. (Added by Stats.1949, c. 79 p. 145, § 1. Amended by Stats.1963, c. 1998, p. 4077, § 2; Stats.1965, c. 286, p. 1287, § 3; Stats.1966, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 12, p. 276, § 4, eff. April il, 1966; Stats.1968, c. 642, § 1; Stats.1972, c. 591, p. 1053, § 1; Stats.1974, c. 1378, p. 3000, § 2; Stats.1984, c. 100, § 2.) Historical Note Stats.1984, c. 100, § 4, read: "In enacting this act it is the intent of the Legislature in the repeal of Sections 36514 and 36516.2, and in the amendment of Section 36516, of the Government Code relating to the salaries of city council members not to invali- date the payment of compensation to city council members approved by the electorate before January 1, 1985, as those sections exist. ed before that date. Any past or future pay- ment of compensation pursuant to those sec. tions is hereby confirmed, validated, and de. clared legally effective." Part of the subject matter of this section was formerly contained in §§ 36514, 36516.2. Derivation: See Derivation under § 36515. Forms See West's California Code Forms, Government. Library References Municipal Corporations T -162(l) et seq. C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 523 et seq. WESTLAW Electronic Research See WESTLAW Electronic Research Guide following the Preface. Notes of Decisions Adjustment of salary 1 1. Adjustment of salary The effective date of an adjustment in the salaries of city council members is delayed pursuant to § 36516.5 until one council mem- ber commences a new term of office when such adjustment is by an ordinance adopted in accordance with this section and is based on an increase in the city's population. 54 Ops. Atty.Gen. 112, 6-30-71. Section 36514 (repealed; see, now, this sec- tion) and this section relating to compensation of city councilmen, preclude a city council, which has declared itself to be the governing board of a redevelopment agency, as autho- rized by Health and S.C., §§ 33007 and 33200, from increasing the compensation of its mem- bers for their service as members of the gov- erning board of the redevelopment agency. 44 Ops.Atty.Gen. 170, 12-22-64. § 36516.1. Elective mayor; additional compensation A mayor elected pursuant to Sections 34900 to 34904, inclusive, of the Government Code may be provided with compensation in addition to that 628 7Y GOVERNMENT OFFICERS—GENERAL § 36516.6 Title 4 Div. 3 Repealed reased beyond the which he receives as a councilman. Such additional compensation may be n amendment to an provided by an ordinance adopted by the city council or by a majority vote of an amount equal to the electors voting on the proposition at a municipal election. of the last adjust- (Added by Stats.1966, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 45, p. 359, § 1.) ndment is enacted. salary increase by virtue of his beginning a new term of office. L provides for auto- Library References Municipal Corporations 4=162(3). C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 534. i and welfare, and C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 523 et seq. .rposes of determin- § 36516.2. Repealed by Stats.1984, c. 100, § 3 are available and See WESTLAW Electronic Research Guide following the Preface. Historical Note c. 1998, p. 4077, § 2 >_76, § 4, eff. April 11, The repealed section, added by Stats.1972, c. Legislative intent relating to repeal of 591, p. 1054, § 2, related to increases and de- § 36516.2, see note under § 36516. 3tats.1974, c. 1378, p, creases in compensation for councilmen. See, now, § 36516. § 36516.5. Prohibition against change in compensation during term of as those sections exist- office; staggered terms tiny past or future pay. pursuant to those sec- A change in compensation does not 1 to a councilman during his term apply med, validated, and de- of office; however, the prohibition herein expressed shall not prevent the adjustment of the compensation of all members of a council serving staggered utter of this section was §§ 36514, 36516.2. terms whenever one or more members of such council becomes eligible for a •ivation under § 36515. salary increase by virtue of his beginning a new term of office. (Added by Stats.1966, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 12, p. 276, § 5, eff. April 11, 1966.) Library References Municipal Corporations 8-162(1). C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 523 et seq. WESTLAW Electronic Research See WESTLAW Electronic Research Guide following the Preface. Notes of Decisions Effective date of change 1 The effective date of an adjustment in the Lied; see, now, this sec- salaries of city council members is delayed Blatin to compensation elating P reclude a city council, pursuant to this section until one council mem- 1. Effective date of change ber commences a new term of office when elf to be the governing A charter city has the authority to adopt an such adjustment is by an ordinance adopted in ordinance to increase compensation for city nent agency, as autho- accordance with § 36516, and is based on an council members which would become effec- C., §§ 33007 and 33200, increase in the cit 's Live at a time different from that p Y rovided b Y Population. 54 Ops.Atty. mpensation of its mem- this section. 57 Ops.Atty.Gen. 11, 1-10-74. Gen. 112, 6-30-71. is members of the gov- ievelopment agency. 44 !2-64. § 36516.6. Repealed by Stats.1985, c. 98, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1987 Historical Note The repealed section, providing for the grant bers, was added by Stats.1985, c. 98, § 1, and of a salary increase to certain council mem- expired by its own terms. i, inclusive, of the in addition to that 629 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 61— TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 28,1999 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Award of contract for the design of ADA Improvements at Sycamore Canyon Park. SUMMARY: The Americans with Disabilities Act (A.D.A) requires that public parks be constructed so that they are accessible to the disabled. When a park has already been constructed without access, the park must be re -constructed, or retro -fit, to accommodate the disabled. Staff released an R.F.P. to obtain a qualified firm to complete the A.D.A. Retro -Fit plan for Sycamore Canyon Park. Of the four proposals submitted, staff has determined that Hirsch and Associates is the most qualified firm for this contract. The City Council has allocated $20,000 in CDBG funds for this project. Total contract amount will be $25,000. RECOMMENDATION ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the design of the A.D.A. Retro -fit of Sycamore Canyon Park to Hirsch and Associates in the amount not to exceed $25,000, It is further recommended that the City Council allocate an additional $5,000 in CDBG funds for this project, for a total allocation of $25,000. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) X Other: Request for Proposals Proposal X Agreement(s) submitted by Hirsch and Associates. EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? X Yes No 2. Does the report require a majority vote? _ Yes X No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belang r City Manager James DeStefano Deputy City Manager DEPARTMENT AD: o e Community Services Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Design of ADA Improvements at Sycamore Canyon Park ISSUE STATEMENT This contract will result in a plan for disabled accessibility, consumer safety product guideline requirements and general improvements at Sycamore Canyon Park. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a contract for the design of the A.D.A. Retro -fit of Sycamore Canyon Park to Hirsch and Associates in the amount not to exceed $25,000. It is further recommended that the City Council allocate an additional $5,000 in CDBG funds for this project, for a total allocation of $25,000. FINANCIAL SUMMARY $20,000 in CDBG funds has been appropriated in the 1999/2000 FY budget for this project. Additional funding from unappropriated CDBG funds is available for this project. BACKGROUND The City Council has appropriated $20,000 in CDBG funds to develop a plan for the ADA Retrofit of Sycamore Canyon Park. This plan will provide staff and the City Council with a list of improvements needed to make the park accessible to the disabled. The plan will also identify corrections that must be made to meet Consumer Safety Product Guidelines and other general changes to improve the park. DISCUSSION Staff released an RFP to seek a consultant to complete the retro -fit plan for Sycamore Canyon Park. A total of four proposals were received and staff interviewed the two firms whose proposals demonstrated the most relevant experience. Staff has determined that the most qualified firm for this project is Hirsch and Associates. The consultant team that Hirsch and Associates has formed for this project includes Alexander & Hibbs, Architect; Dewan, Lundin Associates, Civil Engineering; and Reedcorp Engineering, Electrical Engineer. The proposal fee is $22,380. Staff recommends that an additional $2,620 be added for reimbursables, for a total contract amount of $25,000. PREPARED BY: Bob Rose Community Services Director CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of January 4, 2000 and between the City of Diamond Bar, a municipal corporation ("City") and Hirsch and Associates , ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide consulting services to City, as set forth in Exhibit "A", the City's Request for Proposals dated August 10, 1999. B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. C. Since this is a Federally assisted construction project, Davis -Bacon will be enforced, and if the State and Federal wage rates are applicable, then the higher of the two will be used. The Federal Labor Standards provisions (Form HUD -4010), HUD's Section 3 requirements Federal Minority Business Enterprise / Women's Business Enterprise (MBE/WBE) requirements and the Federal Wage Determination are attached and made part of this agreement, and compliance will be enforced. Any prime contractor or subcontractor working on a Federally assisted project must be eligible to participate. Any agreement must contain the same Federal language. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "B", the Consultant's Response, dated August 10 , 1999 to the City's Request for Proposals. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as set forth in Exhibit "B." 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect January 4, 2000 , and shall continue until December 31, 2000 , unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B." Payment will be made only after submission of proper monthly invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $25,000 . 4. General Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 5. Addresses. City: City of Diamond Bar Consultant: Hirsch and Associates Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Pat Hirsch 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 2221 E. Winston Road, Suite A Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 Anaheim, CA 92806 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shal I have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. B. Consultant agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consultant and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the City Manager or the City Manager's designee. 8. Indemnification. Consultant is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to be performed under this Agreement, and City is relying upon the skill and knowledge of Consultant to perform those services and duties. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Diamond Bar and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively Indemnitee's from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Consultant or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement provision, covenant, or condition of the Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Consultant shall pay Indemnitees for any attorney's fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(b). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several. 9. Insurance. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $100,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (4) professional liability insurance (errors and ommissions) to cover or partially cover damages that may be the result of errors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; and (5) worker's compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater. City, its officers, employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, automotive liability, and worker's compensation coverages. The policy (ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automobile liability, shall provide that they are primary, and that any insurance maintained by the City shall be excess insurance only. A. All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non - renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) day's prior written notice thereof. Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage. City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement B. Consultant agrees that if it does not keep the insurance in full force and effect, and such insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of Consultant and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of City, from payments due Consultant. C. Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other rninimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement". 10. Confidentiality. Consultant in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data of City, private individuals, or employees of the City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 11. Ownership of Materials. All materials provided by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. 12. Conflict of Interest. A. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. B. Consultant covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of hardware or software to City as a result of the performance of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 13. Termination. City may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon fifteen (15) days' written notice to Consultant. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the fifteenth (15th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, City agrees to pay Consultant for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue performing services. 14. Personnel. Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Consultant or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Consultant reserves the right to determine the 4 City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement assignment of its own employees to the performance of Consultant's services under this Agreement, but City reserves the right, for good cause, to require Consultant to exclude any employee from performing services on City's premises. 15. Financial Condition. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Consultant has submitted documentation acceptable to the City Manager, establishing that it is financially solvent, such that it can reasonably be expected to perform the services required by this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall submit such financial information as may be appropriate to establish to the satisfaction of the City Manager that Consultant is in at least as sound a financial position as was the case prior to entering into this Agreement. Financial information submitted to the City Manager shall be returned to Consultant after review and shall not be retained by City. 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Consultant shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of City relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 17. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, and any attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. 18. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall meet with Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, City may direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 19. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 20. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shal I not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 21. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either parry to this Agreement shall commence any legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 22. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile before or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 23. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Manager or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 26. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. written above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first ATTEST: By: City Clerk City of Diamond Bar "CITY" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By: Mayor 21 Consulting Services Agreement Approved as to form: "CONSULTANT' 0 City Attorney Its: City of Diamond Bar Consulting Services Agreement 0� inc. Architecture and Planning THE FIRM Alexander + Hibbs, AIA, Inc., Architects and Planners, provides design and consulting services to clients throughout California and the Western United States. The firm has a dedicated staff of professionals and consulting engineers, who have worked together for several years and are fully experienced in the broad range of design and construction. The firm has been commissioned in the fields of Health, Government, Recreation, Commercial and Industry. Special services include feasibility studies, planning, and interior design. The work of the firm is widely recognized for its practical and effective solutions to functionally and technically complex client needs. Planning and design services with effective project management achieve results in a timely and economical manner. A coordinated multiple discipline approach and strong commitment to quality control in all aspects of project programming and design, insures a project which is within budget and schedule. Our Principals having completed projects in more than forty governmental jurisdictions exemplify our experience and capabilities. Throughout, the Principals of Alexander + Hibbs, AIA, Inc. have maintained the continuity of an excellent working relationship with clients and community staffs and committees, as well as fire, building, engineering, and administrative review agencies. 1200 N. Jefferson St. Suite A. Anaheim, CA 92807 Tel: (714) 630-3686 Fax: (714) 630-3687 Architecture and Planning ALLEN L. HIBBS, AIA, PRINCIPAL EDUCATION California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Bachelor of Science, Architecture, 1975 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Licensed Architect in the States of California, Arizona and Colorado PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS American Institute of Architects AWARDS American Institute of Architects Orange County Chapter AIA - Award of Merit 1982, Smith Park Pool & Recreation Complex Orange County Chapter AIA - Award of Merit 1983, Cal State Northridge Art & Design Center PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Prior to joining Alexander + Hibbs, AIA, Inc., Allen L. Hibbs professional experience included being the Principal or Partner in previous California firms. Dan L. Rowland and Associates, AIA, Inc. - Principal Allen Lee Hibbs & Associates, Inc. - Principal Ralph Allen & Partners, Inc. - Partner William Blurock & Partners, Inc. Allen Hibbs has been the Project Manager or Project Architect for many significant governmental, institutional, commercial and recreation projects. SELECTED PROJECT LIST 24 Hour Fitness Centers Various Locations throughout Southern California Principal -in -Charge and Project Architect for the design and construction of Fitness Centers. Centers include weight and exercise rooms, locker rooms, showers, basketball courts and pools. U.S. Marine Corps Gymnasium/Recreation Complex Camp Pendleton. California Principal -in -Charge and Project Designer for a 31,000 square foot gymnasium building and softball field. The building includes locker rooms, weight rooms, exercise rooms and racquetball courts. Mama O'Brien Park Community Center/Recreation Complex Wildomar (Murrieta) California 1200 N. Jefferson sr. Principal -in -Charge for developing a master plan for a 7 acres park and a 30,000 square foot Suite A.community building. The master plan included a 25 meter pool, two baseball fields, one soccer field, Anaheim, CA 92807 Tel: (714) 630.3686 a group picnic area and a tot lot. Fax: (714) 630.3687 Page 2 Allen L. Hibbs, AIA, Principal Paramount Park CommuniNtSenior Center Paramount, California Principal -in -Charge and Project Designer for the demolition, remodel, and new construction which expanded the facility to its present 15,000 square feet. The project included meeting rooms, offices, and an auditorium with an adjacent commercial kitchen used primarily for senior lunch programs. Syd Kronenthal Park Recreational Building, Culver City. California Principal -in -Charge and Project Designer for a 5,000 square foot recreational building which is the focal point of a newly master -planned neighborhood park. Disneyland Anaheim California Project Architect for several projects within Disneyland including the Haunted Mansion Remodel, Carnation Kitchen Remodel, Adventureland/Frontierland Remodel, and the Cafe Orleans Restaurant Remodel projects. Home Run Park. Anaheim, California Project Architect for the Schematic Design and Cost Analysis for a Baseball oriented amusement complex. The complex includes batting and pitching cages on 2 levels, retail shops, video arcade, outdoor dining, and administrative offices. United States Postal Service. Santa Ana District Principal -in -Charge of over 50 ADA compliance, re -roof, and HVAC remodels for post office facilities. The projects included remodels of public and employee areas including restrooms, lobbies, locker rooms, and site accessibility. Orange County Juvenile Hall Orange, California Principal -in -Charge and Designer for a 30 -bed housing unit, classroom building, and perimeter security fence project at the existing Juvenile Hall Facility. The project includes a facility wide upgrade of the security CCN system and fire protection system. Pacific Coast Sightseeing Tours Headguarters Anaheim California Principal -in -Charge and Project Designer. Encompasses 3.8 acres of property located in the heart of Anaheim. The Headquarters comprises of a 2 -story 18,000 square foot office building with bus maintenance operations, a 7,000 square foot ticketing/concession island for tour patrons, and a separate bus wash/fuel island. FHP Medical Specialties Building Fountain Valley California Project Architect for the Fountain Valley Medical Specialties Building which is a 34,000 square foot, three story facility located on the FHP Medical Center campus. The building contains Gastroenterology, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Oncology, Cardiology, Dental, Health Education and Administration services. Theo Lacy Branch Jail Facility Orange California Project Manager during construction of a 276,000 square foot expansion of the County Jail. The project added 416 minimum security beds and 192 medium security cells, new intake, medical and support facilities. Manchester Fire Station Orange California Project Architect for a 8,000 square foot, two-story fire station developed by the County of Orange for the City of Orange. Page 3 Architecture and Planning ROLLAND E. ALEXANDER III, PRINCIPAL EDUCATION California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Bachelor of Architecture, 1985 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Architect in the state of California PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS Member, Orange County AIA, 1984 Founding Member, Committee on Architecture for Health OC/AIA Surfrider Foundation PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ated s career as a part-time P oentto to Dan' L. Rowland and AssAlexander + n it s, AIA, Rolland c. and progressed fir m dralftsman to architect and stuud then promoted to associate of the firm. Experience includes all facets of project phasing including marketing, fee proposals, design, contract documents and construction administration. Emphasis has been given to healthcare work, primarily acute care facilities. Hospital experience encompasses all aspects of acute care design and construction including installation of radiology equipment (C. T. scanners, radftomo, nuclear med.) at several facilities as well as remodels to the following departmental types: Dietary Pharmacy Surgery/O.R. (Laminar Flow) Clinical Labs Obstetrics (LDR's, NICU, Birthing Centers) Radiology SELECTED PROJECT LIST Outpatient Services Hyperbaric Units Administration Physician Suites Emergency Rooms/Departments ICU/CCU Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center Health Center Principal4n-Charge and designer of adapting reuse of existing office building into 20,000 s.f. medical offices with specialized regional breast center infusion suites and various primary care suites. 1200 N. Jefferson St. Suite A. Anaheim, CA 92807 Tel (714) 630-3686 Fax: (714) 630-3687 Page 2 Rolland E. Alexander 111, Principal Saddleback Memorial Medical Center. Laguna Hills California Principal -in -Charge and Designer for three new cath labs, remodel of emergency department, and a new 15 -bed post partum unit. Century City Hospital Century CM1, California, Tenet Healthcare Principal -in -Charge and Designer for remodel and expansion of 13 departments in the existing 9 story, 4 level basement hospital. Departments include clinical lab, cardio -pulmonary, pharmacy, out-patient services, surgery and recovery as well as an additional of a new staff elevator. Western Medical Center. Santa Ana. California Principal -in -Charge and Designer of master plan in existing acute care facility including obstetrics unit (LDR's, NICU), surgery department, recovery units and support spaces. Designer of proposed lobby remodel and expansion. Sechrist Hyperbaric Suites Principal -in -Charge of incorporating new Hyperbaric Chamber Suites into acute care facilities (Glendale Memorial Hospital & Health Center and Western Medical Center). FHP Hospital, Fountain Valley. California. FHP, Inc. Project Architect for various remodel projects including emergency room addition. Remodels encompass every major department within the hospital. FHP Hospital. Salt Lake City, Utah. FHP, Inc. 189 Beds; 168,000 square feet. Co -designer of this five story acute care hospital within a 26 acre medical center campus 24 Hour Fitness Center, Santa Clarita. Califomia (& Various Locations throughout Southern California) Designer and Project Architect of a 25,000 square foot, ground -up health club. OCJJC Manchester Complex Master Plan Orange California Design team member and schematic design for the County of Orange 72 acre site. Camp Pendleton Gymnasium Project Architectforthe 31,000 square foot gymnasium building with locker rooms, weight rooms, and racquetball courts. Santiago Hills Police/Fire Facility, Orange. California Project Architect for 14,100 square foot 2 story police and battalion level fire station. Design incorporates parameters of an Irvine Company master planned community. The Quarter. Anaheim. California Principalmin-Charge and Designer of master plan for a 23 acre/213,000 entertainment center with hotel pad. ©� inc. .. Architecture and Planning PROJECT EXPERIENCE RECREATION Disneyland, Adventureland/Frontierland Remodel, Anaheim San Dimas Sports Complex, San Dimas Capistrano Bay Multi -Purpose Facility, Dana Point Marna O'Brien Recreation Facility Master Plan, Wildomar (Murrietta) Syd Kronenthal Community Center, Culver City GOVERNMENT Betty Lou Lamoreaux Juvenile Justice Center, County of Orange Theo Lacy Jail Facility Expansion, Orange Mancheter Complex Master Plan, County of Orange Santiago Hills Police Station, Orange Officers Quarters Rehabilitation, EI Toro Marine Base, EI Toro Camp Pendleton Gymnasium, Camp Pendleton Marine Base, Oceanside COMMERCIAL Handyman Stores, Mira Mesa, Vista, National City and Chula Vista Petco, San Bruno Blockbuster Video Store, San Bruno Marshalls Department Store, San Bruno Hughes Markets Distribution Center, Banana Ripening Room, Irwindale Disneyland, Carnation Kitchen, Anaheim FHP Corporate Headquarters, Fountain Valley Comp USA Computer Store, San Bruno HEALTH FHP Hospital, Fountain Valley FHP Medical Specialty Building, Fountain Valley FHP Charter Hospital, Hawaiian Gardens FHP Hospital, Salt Lake City Western Medical Center, Santa Ana Western Medical Center, Anaheim Century City Hospital, Century City Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, Fountain Valley 1200 N. Jefferson St..i Suite A. Anaheim, CA 92807 Tel: (714) 630-3686 Fax: (714) 630-3687 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. ADA COMPLIANCE: SURVEY /ANALYSIS /`pTES POSTAI-) yN ❑ D W < i>- z a n M INDUSTRIAL } Z � Xx " �t \ \, I ✓\ �✓ vac L---- — AM I inc. ArrhlfecAJre and Planning ADH Inc. provides complete building and site analysis of existing property for ADA compliance; O Site Access O Parking O Building O Toilet Room ❑ PRIVATE ❑ PUBLIC ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ INDUSTRIAL ADH Inc. provides full construction documents that will enable your facility to be ADA compliant, We have completed over 2 dozen ADA compliance projects for U.S,P,S, and the City of Placentia. i EAST .............un rte- y a I E 11�� ®ME me- SIR pit NORTH Marna O'Brien Park Community Center/ Recreation Complex Master Plan Wildomar, California Client: Ortega Trail Recreation and Park District Size: 7 Acres The site is located in the rural setting of Wildomar, which is an unincorporated area within Riverside County. The project Master Plan includes a 30,000 sq. ft. community building, a 25 meter pool, two baseball fields, one soccer field, a group picnic area, a tot lot, and parking for 123 vehicles, 10) C. The Maser Plan identifies and prioritizes District functions and proximity relation- ships for the site. Detailed program requirements, space standards and support services were developed for each function. The building functions include a gymna- sium, locker rooms, recreation offices, county library branch, meeting rooms Architecture and Planning 41r 40 11' which can be utilized as banquet facilities, commercial kitchen with concession area, exercise room, and storage on the first floor with District Administration offices located on the second floor. The resulting facility needs have been incorporated into a phased building program for the overall site. AL ©� inc. Architecture and�PI-Ilnlll! Syd Kronenthal Park Recreational Building Culver City, California Client: City of Culver City Size: 5,000 Square Feet Project Architect: Allen Hibbs The recreational building Is the focal point of the newly master -planned and developed 7 acre neighborhood park for the City of Culver City. The building Includes meeting areas that also function as a day care facility and recreation rooms, recreation office, park restrooms, and a maintenance shop for the storage of materials and equipment used to maintain the park site, The design of the building was of a scale and character that blends with the surrounding community. AQ m I inc. Architecture and Pidnning Paramount Park Community/Senior Center Paramount, California Client: City of Paramount Size: 15,000 Square Feet The community building is located in the main park facility in the City of Paramount. The project included demolition, remodel, and new additional construction which expanded the facility to its present 15,000 s.f. The building includes an auditorium, meeting rooms, offices for staff and recreation staff, counseling rooms, and a commercial kitchen. The center provides a senior lunch program for approximately 300 people and a wide variety of senior programs. A special feature of the project was the participation in the City's Art in Public Places Program in which a metal sculpture by Hal Pastorius was incorporated into the entry plaza. „wT.rLt-= E � 0=_ ince Architecture and Planning U.S. MARINE CORPS GYMNASIUM/ RECREATION COMPLEX Camp Pendleton, California Client: Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command Size: 4 Acres The site is located in the coastal setting of Camp Pendleton, which is an area within San Diego County. The project includes a 31,000 sq. ft. gymnasium building, one softball field, and parking for 40 vehicles. The Master Plan identifies functions and proximity relationships for the site. Detailed program requirements, space standards and support services were developed for each function, The building functions include a gymnasium,locker rooms, weight rooms, exercise rooms, racquetball courts, control/check-out area, offices, and washroom and storage areas. (3)FITNESS Alexander + Hibbs Principals have along history with fitness centers having first designed a club for Family Fitness in 1987 and continuing today with 24 Hour Fitness. Alexander Hibbs provides a variety of services from space planning, CUP submittals, Remodels and ground up design, _&M I inc. Architecture and Planning LONG BEACH rtl* WILSHIRE o#4 PALOS VERDES COSTA MESA E;�* EAST ANAHEIM =#4 HUNTINGTON BEACH i� IRVINE (CULVER PLAZA) IRVINE (U.C.I. CAMPUS) _&M I inc. Architecture and Planning LAGUNA HILLS ca MISSION VIEJO 13-91 NEWPORT BEACH ORANGE E;�* RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA =#4 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO TEMECULA _&M I inc. Architecture and Planning . . FITNESS SANTA CLA�R/TA, EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVA L -----J L_ ----J --J AEROBICS EXEK15E 3,591 SF _ 5,553 SF WOMEN'SIdUN9RY F MEN'SLOCKERS LO_CKFWS (M LOCKERS) MO LOCKERS) — — — — _ — fig SF BABYSUMGG 1,460 SF M X129 SF .�� V. T[lE I ' I SLOW WALlS/ D4 FREE WEIGHTS i ------- 3,665 SF SALES i 550 SF RECEPTION Al CARDIO 1 1 2,683 SF i LOBBY 'PRO SHOP --------- 3495E ---------- L____—J L ------ L —_--- J L ---_—J L ------ PLAN ♦A M I inn. Architecture and Planning Home Run Park Anaheim, California Client: Anaheim Sports Complex, Inc. Size: 52,250 Square Feet Project Architect., Allen Hibbs The project was to provide Schematic Design and Cost Analysis for a Baseball oriented amusement complex. The complex Includes batting and pitching cages on 2 levels, retail shops, video arcade, outdoor dining, and administrative offices, all over 2 levels of underground parking for 200 cars. �©= inc. Architecture and Planning ♦©M MOM Disneyland Carnation Kitchen Restaurant Remodel Anaheim, California Client: Disneyland Size: 8,500 Square Feet The project was to renovate the dining area and remodel and expand the kitchen facility at the Carnation Kitchen Restaurant. The design included a complete new commercial kitchen with preparation area, scullery, walk-in refrigerators and freezer, and dry storage. The work also included providing new stairways to the roof top and mechanical room levels that originally had only ladder access. Special attention to detail in the public areas was taken to match the original motif. L&E inc. Architecture and Planning REFERENCES (Former Supervisor, 4th District) William G. Steiner, Director, National Programs CHILDHELP USA 15757 N. 78th Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 602/922-7061 Mr. Bob Parco, Director of Facilities SADDLEBACK MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 24451 Health Center Drive Laguna Hills, California 92653 949/837-4500 Mr. Jerry O'Connell, President PACIFIC COAST SIGHTSEEING TOURS 1213 East Howell Avenue Anaheim, California 92805 714/978-8855 Mr. Ho Won Suh, Project Manager UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Administrative Services 2201 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, California 92711-7184 714/667-6794 Mr. Don Fischbeck, Project Manager 24 HOUR FITNESS CENTERS Corporate Offices 18101 Von Karman, Suite 400 Irvine, California 92612 949/851-3828 Mr. Kirk Brantley, Director of Facilities WESTERN MEDICAL CENTERS 1001 North Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 714/953-3641 1200 N -Jefferson St. Suite A. Anaheim, CA 92807 Tel: (714) 630-3686 Fax: (714) 630-3687 Reedcorp Engineering Electrical Engineers 2061 Business Center Drive, #110 Irvine, California 92715 949/752-1278 Principal Ronald Reed, P.E. Reedcorp Engineering has provided twenty-seven years experience in electrical design of lighting systems, specializing in commercial projects, lighting design and electrical distribution systems, and a recognized leading consultant for sports recreation lighting projects throughout California. Mr. Reed is a member of the Institute of Electrical Technicians (ICET) sponsored by the National Society of Professional Engineers, California Electrical Design Apprenticeship Council, Building Industry Association and Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). Reedcorp Engineering brings together the vast experience of a building industry which encompasses the design of lighting power systems, energy management systems and power distribution systems. Mr. Reed has been keynote speaker on recreation lighting at the Southwest Regional Conference for Landscape Architects and the California League of Cities Conference and is the Chief Electrical Designer for all park and recreational lighting projects for Reedcorp Engineering. Jack A. Simmonds, P.E., Associate Jack Simmonds attended the University of Vancouver and received his California P.E. registration in 1966. Mr. Simmonds previously maintained his own consulting firm in Orange County for many years. Professional memberships include Illuminating Engineering Society, Orange County National Society of Professional Engineers and Consulting Engineers Association of California. Mario Fernandez, Associate Mario Fernandez has more than twenty-eight years of experience in electrical design for commercial and industrial projects. He completed his education at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina and began his electrical engineering experience in the United States in 1962. Mr. Fernandez is responsible for coordinating Reedcorp Engineering projects with client and other consultants. Michael R. Reed, Associate Michael Reed provides in-house coordination of utility companies, Title 24 compliance and computer design of all Reedcorp Engineering projects. Professional Experience • Creekside Park, City of Walnut; electrical design for 2 -lighted ballfields and concession building. San Dimas SportsPlex, City of San Dimas; electrical design for 5 -lighted ballfields, football stadium, 12 lighted tennis courts, concession/restroom building and public address system. • Cerritos Sports Complex, City of Cerritos; electrical design for 5 -lighted ballfields, public address system, electronic scoreboard and concession / restroom buildings. • Almansor Park, City of Alhambra; 2 -lighted ballfields and concession/restroom building. Mir Sch _— Associates Inc. • Lake Center Sports Complex, City of Santa Fe, 4 -lighted ballfields, soccer field and concession/restroom building. • Monroe Park, City of Riverside; 6 -lighted ballfields with soccer overlays and concession/restroom building. • Lancaster Park -East, City of Lancaster; l -lighted ballfield with provisions for future complex. • Tustin Sports Park, City of Tustin; 3 lighted ballfields, 2 lighted soccer fields, 6 lighted tennis courts, parking and walkway lighting, resroom concession building. • San Juan Capistrano Sports Park, City of San Juan Capistrano; 3 lighted ballfields, restroom concession building, parking and walkway lighting, electronic scoreboards, public address systems, and master utility design for future community center, school, swim facility on same site. • Sunnymead Park, City of Moreno Valley; 4 lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, parking and walkway lighting, electri scoreboards, public address system. Sch &Associates Inc. SURENDER M. DEWAN, P.E. PROJECT ASSIGNMENT: Project Manager EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Delhi University, 1970 Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Washington University, 1978 ACTIVE REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer, California - RCE 34559 Civil Engineer, Nevada - RCE 11221 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: 1994 -Present 1978-1994 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND: Principal, DLA Division Manager, DGA Consultants, Inc. Mr. Dewan, Principal of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA), has over 29 years of professional experience in the design of Public Works projects. Mr. Dewan is responsible for performing and/or coordinating engineering design and other related technical services including project management; preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, design, and evaluation of major street improvement projects, including numerous projects involving rubberized asphalt. Mr. Dewan has served as Project Manager on numerous municipal projects: • Arrow Highway Street Resurfacing and Restoration Project - San Dimas • 1996-1997 CDBG Street Renovation Project - Baldwin Park • Baldwin Park Boulevard Improvements - Baldwin Park • 32nd StreeVNewport Boulevard Rehabilitation - Newport Beach • Firestone Boulevard Improvements - South Gate • Southern Avenue Improvements - South Gate • Ambushers and Meadowglen Street Improvements- Diamond Bar • Brea Canyon Road and Brea Canyon Cut-off Street Improvements - Diamond Bar • Bloomfield Avenue Improvements - Cerritos • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements, Grand Ave, to State Route 60 - Diamond Bar • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements, Palomino to Temple - Diamond Bar • Sunset Crossing Improvements - Diamond Bar • Brookhurst Street/Trask Avenue Intersection Improvements - Garden Grove. • 183rd Street Improvements - Cerritos • 166th Street Improvements - Cerritos • Norwalk Boulevard Improvements - Cerritos • Katella Avenue, State College Blvd. to 57 Freeway Improvements - Anaheim • State College Blvd., Orangewood Ave. to Katella Ave. Improvements - Anaheim WALTER F. LUNDIN, P.E. PROJECT ASSIGNMENT: Quality Control and Specifications EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1977 Masters of Business Administration, National University, 1989 ACTIVE REGISTRATION: Registered Civil Engineer, California Certificate 44453 • Professional Engineer, Hawaii License Number PE -5666 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: 1994 -Present Principal, DLA 1989-1994 Construction Manager, FHP, Inc. 1977-1984 Contracting Officer, U.S. Navy PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND: Mr. Lundin, Principal of Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DLA), has over 20 years experience in quality control and construction management of roadway and drainage projects. Within Mr. Lundin's quality control experience he has been responsible for constructibility review of plans and specifications, development and implementation of contractor quality control programs, and final acceptance of completed work. In the area of construction management, Mr. Lundin has been responsible for obtaining and evaluating bids, reviewing contractor qualifications, coordinating contractor's work with the client, reviewing requests for clarification, negotiating and approving change orders, approving requests for payment, coordinating inspections of work, final acceptance of work, and review of as -guilt plans. Recent projects on which Mr. Lundin provided design and construction services include: • South Laguna Beach Storm Drain - Laguna Beach • Orange Fair Lane Storm Drain Improvements - Anaheim • 1996-1997 CDBG Street Renovation Project - Baldwin Park • Baldwin Park Boulevard Improvements - Baldwin Park • Sunset Crossing Road Improvements - Diamond Bar • Southern Avenue Improvements - South Gate • Firestone Boulevard Improvements - South Gate • Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase I - South Gate • Diamond Bar Boulevard Improvements - Diamond Bar • Grand Avenue Improvements - Diamond Bar • Slurry Seal Area V and VI - Diamond Bar LIST OF REFERENCES Additional information regarding the professional capabilities of Dewan, Lundin & Associates can be obtained by contacting the present and former clients listed below. We urge you to contact these references regarding our record of performance, quality of work, and ability to meet time schedules. Mr. Bill Patapoff City of Newport Beach City Engineer (949) 644-3321 Mr. Jim Biery City of South Gate Director of Public Works (323) 563-9537 Mr. Bob Kellison City of Fountain Valley Project Coordinator (714) 965-4400 I Mr. Ralph Harp City of Anaheim Principal Civil Engineer (714) 765-5176 Mr. Arjan Idnani City of Baldwin Park Engineering Supervisor (626) 960-4011 STREET IMPROVEMENTS DLA provides a full realm of services to various clients for their street improvement and new roadway design projects. Our staff has been responsible for preliminary and final plans, specifications and estimates, projects and contract administration, construction observation, right-of-wayengineering, field and construction surveying, pavement evaluation and rehabilitation, alignment studies, bicycle roadway systems, environmental impact studies, street lighting plans, landscape architecture, construction traffic control plans, bid documents, and preparation of as -constructed drawings. Our staff is also familiar with government funding requirements such as Community Development Block Grants, Federal Aid Urban, Housing and Urban Development, Local Public Works Act Bill, Housing and Community Development Administration, and Arterial Highway Financing Programs, ISTEA, and Measure "M". STREET IMPROVEMENT EXPERIENCE Listed below are some of the major street improvement projects in progress or recently completed by our firm. Client: City of Anaheim Project: KATELLA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Description: Katella Avenue from State College Boulevard to the 57 Freeway. The project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, reconstruction of curb and gutter, construction of landscaped median divider, signage and striping plans and traffic control plans. Construction Cost: $800,000 Year Completed: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Eddy Jan, Associate Engineer (714) 746-5176 Client: City of Anaheim Project: STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Description: State College Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to Katella Avenue. The project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, reconstruction of curb and gutter, construction of landscaped median divider, signage and striping plans and traffic control plans. Construction Cost: $1 Million Year Completed: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Eddy Jan, Associate Engineer (714) 746-5176 Client: City of South Gate Project: TOWNE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS Description: Street improvements on all four legs of Firestone Boulevard/Garfield Avenue. The project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing, construction of landscaped median divider, parkway improvements, installation of traffic signals, signage and striping plans. Construction Cost: $650,000 Year Completed. In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Tom Melendrez, Associate Engineer (323) 563-9582 Client: City of Cerritos Project: 183RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS Description: 183`d Street from Shoemaker Avenue to Marquardt Avenue. The project included construction of landscaped and irrigated medians on 183`d Street and rehabilitation of existing pavement using rubberized asphalt, construction of drainage improvements, signage, and striping plans. Total length 1.0 miles. Construction Cost: $1 Million Contact Person: Mr. Vince Brar, Director of Public Works (562) 860-0311 Client: City of Baldwin Park Project: BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Description: Baldwin Park Boulevard from Francisquito Avenue to Merced Avenue. Project included the reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway using rubberized asphalt, signage and striping plans, etc. Total length of project 3/4 mile. Construction Cost: $500,000 Year Completed: 1997 Contact Person: Mr. Ar an Idnani, Supervising Engineer (626) 960-4011 Client: City of Baldwin Park Project: 1996-1997 CDBG STREET RENOVATION PROJECT Description: The project consists of design of street improvements including design survey for various streets in the City of Baldwin Park. Construction Cost: $1 Million Completion Date: In Progress Contact Person: Mr. Arjan Idnani, Supervising Engineer (626) 9604011 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD Description: Diamond Bar Boulevard from Grand Avenue to State Route 60. Project included reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway including rubberized asphalt, signage and striping plans, etc. Total length 1.75 miles. Construction Cost: $1 Million Year Completed: 1996 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 i Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: AMBUSHERS AND MEADOWGLEN IMPROVEMENTS Description: Ambushers Street between Woodhill Circle and 20914 Ambushers Street, and Meadowglen Road between Ironhorse Canyon and Silver Rain Drive. 'Project included street and storm drain plans, striping and signage plans, spdcifications. Construction Cost: $350,000 Year Completed: 1998 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD Description: Diamond Bar Boulevard from Palomino Drive to Temple Avenue. This project includes reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, signage and striping. Construction Cost: $950,000 Year Completed: 1998-99 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Diamond Bar Project: SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Description: Sunset Crossing Road from Golden Springs Drive to Diamond Bar Boulevard. This project included reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing roadway, signage and striping plans. Total length 1.25 miles. Construction Cost: $350,000 Year Completed: 1996 Contact Person: Mr. David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works (909) 396-5672 Client: City of Cerritos Project: 166TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS Description: 166th Street Improvements, from Bloomfield Avenue to Norwalk Boulevard. Norwalk Boulevard Improvements, from Del Amo Avenue to Northerly City limits. Total length 1.6 miles. Construction Cost: $500,000 Contact Person: Mr. Rash Syed, Associate Engineer (562) 860-0311 Client: City of Garden Grove Project: BROOKHURST STREETITRASK AVENUE INTERSECTION Description: The project consisted of reconstruction/rehabilitation of the intersection with fabric, rubberized asphalt, additional tum lanes, signal modifications, etc. Construction Cost: $300,000 Contact Person: Mr. Navin Maru, Associate Engineer (714) 741-5184 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT, TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 REPORT DATE: December 28, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SUMMARY: This report addresses the request of the City Council for staff to provide information on the pros and cons of a single service provider system within the framework of the recently enacted solid waste and recycling code modifications versus maintaining open permit system as currently employed. A description of the options, pros and cons of open market versus exclusive arrangements, analogous implementation schedules, and other information (e.g., rate impacts, diversion potential, environmental effects) needed by the Council to make a determination is included. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the attached report and provide direction to staff. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X_ Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution _ Bid Specification _ Ordinance Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the Resolution, ordinance, or agreement been reviewed? N/A _ Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belan City Manager James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Da G. Liu Deputy Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: December 29, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION Executive Summary This report addresses the request of the City Council for staff to provide information on the merits of a single service provider (exclusive hauler) system within the framework of the recently enacted solid waste and recycling code modifications versus maintaining an open permit system as currently employed. This report includes a description of the exclusive hauler options, pros and cons of open market versus exclusive arrangements, analogous implementation schedules, and other information (e.g., rate impacts, diversion potential, environmental effects) needed by the City Council to make a determination. It was found by the Solid Waste Standards Task Force (Task Force) that the existing system of refuse collection and recycling yields a relatively low level of diversion. While there are positive aspects (e.g., freedom of choice and market demand) to continuation of the open permit system, there are a number of negative aspects such as traffic, street wear and tear, noise, and air pollution, from the imposition of multiple haulers each using two or more vehicles to collect refuse and recyclables. In addition, open systems are found only among recently incorporated cities. Nearly all cities in Los Angeles County have closed systems for the collection of refuse and recyclables in at least the residential sector. Where there are open systems, it has been the choice of the jurisdiction involved to either maintain open competition or to not involve itself in what is viewed as an open market system. In this report, staff findings are provided, but no recommendations are made with respect to the choice involved. Sufficient data are presented so that the City Council can make an informed choice. Page 1 12/29/99 Purpose Pursuant to the directions of the City Council, staff was given the task of examining the pros and cons of the open market permit system versus an exclusive permit, contract, or franchise for the collection of refuse and recycling throughout the City. Staff was to report back to the City Council the relative merits of either approach. The report would include comparative information including environmental impact, rates, institutional requirements, and timelines so that the City Council could make a reasonable determination of which approach best fits the City in light of new requirements. Background It is known that residential waste represents the majority of refuse collected and disposed in Diamond Bar. Residential waste is substantively different from commercial waste in that each discrete generator, i.e., the household, produces waste that is collected normally once each week. As identified in earlier reports, residential waste in divided into two groups: single family residences (SFRs) and multi -family residences (MFRS). SFRs are most often detached homes and each household has one or more containers ranging in size up to 100 gallons capacity that are filled with trash and taken to the curb to be collected by the hauler on the designated trash day. SFRs have also afforded the opportunity of curbside collection of recyclables and used oil, both of which are included in the monthly SFR rate, and complimentary home composting units. Recently, City Council enacted an ordinance that will substantively change solid waste programming to include pay as you throw rate structure, a ban on disposal of readily recyclable wastes, and program provisions for SFRs, MFRS, and businesses. Multi -family housing is divided into two types: those with barrels (i.e., services similar to SFRs since units are detached and semi-detached condos and town homes), and those with bins instead of individual containers. Bins normally serve several tenant units, who share the bin. Bin -served accounts can be picked up daily but no less than once per week. Residential waste is the single largest sector of generation in the City. It is known that about 37,000 tons of waste, based on the 1998 AB 939 Annual Report (see Attachment 1), are collected and disposed annually from residential sources. As a consequence, residential waste diversion is the City's best hope for complying with AB 939. At Page 2 12/29/99 present, SFRs contribute about'/4 of the total diversion credited to the City. Businesses provide up to 75% of all diversion. As noted in earlier reports, the City does not control rates or collection, but it does regulate collectors. Rate setting authority is most often contained in city ordinances. In Diamond Bar, prospective haulers must obtain permits, and are held accountable to various code standards, many of which are derived from County and State code provisions and regulations, and accepted industry sanitary and safety practices. At present, there are three firms who have permits and one firm that has applied for a permit. Waste Management, Inc. is the newly merged corporation consisting of USA Waste and Waste Management, Inc, and the merged firm currently collects about 75% of all waste disposed from Diamond Bar sources based on the aforementioned Attachment 1 and other sources. Waste Management also collects more than 95% of all SFR waste and recyclables set out at the curb. Two firms, Athens (previously known as Modem Services Company) and Valley Vista Disposal (AKA Industry Disposal), collect up to an estimated 5% of the waste stream combined based on Attachment 1 and other sources. Athens collects waste from a few businesses, schools, and MFR accounts. Valley Vista collects principally from a few businesses near the 60 freeway and from recent housing developments. Recently, Universal Waste Systems of Pomona, applied for a haulers' permit in Diamond Bar. However, they do not currently collect any refuse or recyclables. Companies lacking City permits haul the remaining 20% of waste reported by disposal sites either as legal self -haul or illegal hauling. Self -haulers include landscapers, gardeners, roofers, residents and businesses doing an occasional load of debris, and construction and demolition companies; all of which is legal. They probably collect about 80% of this 20% segment of the market share. The small segment collected by illegal operators is difficult to control and remains an ongoing effort since operators change constantly, and inadequate resources exist to catch and prosecute all of these offenders. Since Diamond Bar is essentially an open competition jurisdiction with regards to refuse, is this the norm or a significant variation from the norm? In Los Angeles County, there are 88 jurisdictions. Of these, it is known that four, including Diamond Bar, feature some level of open competition in the residential sector. Interestingly, these four (Diamond Page 3 12/29/99 Bar, La Habra Heights, Calabassas, and La Canada Flintridge) have all incorporated within the last few years with the exception of La Habra Heights. Therefore, the none for cities in LA County is to limit competition to one or two haulers who collect refuse from all residential accounts. Diamond Bar has three current haulers, but could have more since competition is not limited except that each hauler must be permitted by the City. In terms of commercial waste, there is no norm for franchising, and in fact, many cities maintain dual systems in which the residential sector is franchised and the commercial sector is not. However, in the San Gabriel Valley and Chino Valley, most cities have awarded exclusive contracts for both the residential and commercial sectors. One of the main reasons to award an exclusive arrangement for both sectors is to reap the benefits of larger market share and the more lucrative commercial accounts, enabling haulers to reduce prices to less lucrative residential units. Besides the reason cited above, does an exclusive hauler system create tangible and intangible benefits to the City or its residents? Conversely, do open market systems create tangible and intangible benefits? We can identify the pros and cons and analyze their impact upon Diamond Bar. Analysis Based on data previously discussed with the Task Force, an evaluation was conducted by JMH. Five factors were considered in the evaluation: diversion impact, cost and benefits, timelines, waste prevention incentives, and institutional impacts. Pros and cons are identified for each as appropriate. Table 1 summarizes the pros and cons. Diversion impacts -- Cities opt for an exclusive system because of a variety of reasons, but diversion is one that can have significant impact. Diversion is actually two issues in one. One, it appears to be easier to achieve diversion when only one hauler is involved, since programs and monitoring can be standardized. Second, reducing the number of haulers lessens the chance that mis-reporting of disposal tonnage occurs. This latter aspect has become a critical one, since diversion is measured indirectly; the absence of disposal infers diversion. The more haulers there are, the greater the chance for data problems. Several cities have recently run afoul of the Integrated Waste Management Board due to incalculable numbers. Page 4 12/29/99 Pros and Cons of Onen Versus Exclusive Svstems Item open System Exclusive System Advantage Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages Diversion Flexibility due to • Lower diversion . Greater diversion • Inflexibility depending upon impacts greater number of . Permittee failures Better measurement hauler selected haulers . Complexity • Program consistency • & uniformity • AB 939 compliance Costs & benefits • No city control . Market demand forces • More City control . City can lose control due to . Can reap revenues • Road wear & tear • Franchise fees external factors from gross receipts . Liability • Lower rates • Evergreen terms and permit fees • Rate instability More services • Potential corruption • Less services • Economy of scale Inflexibility . More noise • Responsiveness Long term contracts . More traffic • Rate stability/regulations • No control . Less traffic • Less responsive • Less maintenance • Poorer aesthetics . Less noise . Market shares smaller . Better aethestics leading to higher prices . Long term disposal capacity • Poor aesthetics • Commercial sector allows residential price break Timelines Scheduling • Need to keep haulers on . Only one hauler to administer Scheduling • Discontinuance schedule . Discontinuance • RFP unnecessary_ • RFP process • No hauler changes • Phasing in of hauler Incentives . All haulers can . Greater staff time • Consistency & uniformity of comply . Monitoring issues incentives • Ordinance stipulates . Enforcement • Less monitoring conditions of permit . Reporting problems . Hauler inability • Less reporting issues • Amortization lowers cost None Program stability . Indemnification . Less staff time Institutional 0 Freedom of choice • Liability • Bidding yields best deal . Freedom of choice limited . No need for bidding . Haulers change • Coordination with street Discontinuance issue • Flexible Illegal hauling increased sweeping • Inflexible • Market forces Scheduling of programs . Termination clauses In some cases, haulers have successfully argued for a city to establish a franchise or contract especially for the commercial sector (which tends to be less restricted than residential) so that all waste generated in a jurisdiction could be directed to a mass processing facility. Obviously, economy -of -scale considerations apply here, and the argument goes that with the greater tonnage it is more economical to process the waste. For curbside recycling, the conventional wisdom is that fewer haulers means less monitoring effort on the part of the jurisdiction with regards to their diversion activities. And, there may be some benefits to ease of implementation of programs since collection routing is standardized. In the case of diversion of open versus exclusive systems, we can examine the results of the recent biennial review performed by the Integrated Waste Management Board. Regarding the four open cities, Calabassas was approved, Diamond Bar received a good faith effort, and La Canada Flintridge and La Habra Heights both got a compliance order. For exclusive cities, 21 out of 85 jurisdictions received a compliance order. It would appear that exclusive cities fared better with regards to monitoring, documentation of diversion, and programming, given that compliance orders were for inadequate programming. Cost and benefits — We have selected below a few cities to examine in detail their rate structures in comparison to Diamond Bar. Exclusive cities are identified in the table that is shown below and open cities are shown in the table immediately following. �..,,:.—..,, r+U.. 0�4–� Cnmrnpnts Monrovia: $10.13 base rate (BR) No franchise fee (FF) but some funds rebated Newco (w/ yard waste and recycling) to city monthly ($12,000). City is automated with $1 other fees yard waste and curbside recycling. City $11.13 total rate TR received biennial review approval from CIWMB. Covina $8.77 BR Standard 3 -barrel system, but no waste Athens $3.53 w/ yard waste reduction incentive. City received biennial $1.91 w/ recycling review approval from CIWMB. $14.21 TR San Gabriel $12.09 BR Standard 3 -barrel system, but no waste Athens $1.20 w/ yard waste reduction incentive. City received compliance $1.31 w/ recycling order. $2.10 w/ city fee $16.70 TR La Puente: $10.87 BR (w/ recycling and yard Automated with yard waste and curbside Valley Vista waste) + $1.20 FF recycling. No waste reduction incentive. City $12.07 TR received compliance order. Walnut: $9.13 BR + $1.50 FF + $2.30 recycle FF set at 15%. City received compliance order. Waste + 2.93 yard waste + $0.20 AB939 fee Management = $16.06 TR Page 6 12/29/99 Baldwin Park: Waste Management $10.51 BR $1.30 FF $1.16 w/ recycling $12.97 TR Hauler has not taken cost of living adjustment for last two years. City received compliance order. West Covina: $14.62 BR (w/ yard waste collection) Automated collection with two barrels, one for Athens $1.39 FF greens and the other for refuse. Resident can 2 residential $0.14 other fees choose between 60 gal and 90 -gal container, haulers w/ $16.15 TR with increase in rate for larger container. Form 18 in of variable rate. All residential waste is mass business processed for 50% diversion. City received sector. biennial review approval from CIWMB. Diamond $13.25 BR (w/ recycling) City gets no FF. Semi -automated system of Bar: Open, $0.35 w/ AB939 fee collection only. Recycling cost not itemized on permit system $13.60 TR (Waste Management) billing to residents. Free compost containers to haulers w/ 5 residents not offered in any other city where in business $14.42 BR (w/recycling) residents have to pay up to $40 ea. City sector. $0.35 w/ AB 939 fee received biennial review approval from CIWMB. Diamond $14.77 TR Valle Vista City gets no FF. Semi -automated system of r%--- r%;4— 004nc Cemments La Canada $18.25 base rate (TR) on average 10% franchise fee (FF). City is manual with Flintridge: (w!o recycling) curbside recycling using small crate. No limits Open permit, on trash. City received compliance order. 2 residential haulers w/ 18 in business sector. Calabassas $27.28 TR Automated 3 -barrel system, with pay as you Open permit, throw rates as dictated by city ordinance. City 2 residential gets fee for service. City received biennial haulers w/ 5 review approval from CIWMB. in business sector. Diamond $13.25 BR (w/ recycling) City gets no FF. Semi -automated system of Bar: Open, $0.35 wl AB939 fee collection only. Recycling cost not itemized on permit $13.60 TR (Waste Management) billing to residents. Free compost containers to system residents not offered in any other city where $14.42 BR (w/recycling) residents have to pay up to $40 ea. City $0.35 w/ AB 939 fee received biennial review approval from CIWMB. $14.77 TR Valle Vista It can be seen in this random selection that the open system in general is less beneficial in a monetary sense to the City. The City receives no compensation to offset any costs resulting from administration and maintenance. In terms of pricing and price competition, an area touted by some as a reason to select an open system, Diamond Bar's rates are comparatively higher in the sample of rates for exclusive cities on the basis of equivalent programming and exclusion of city fees. We can compare Diamond Bar to all cities in Los Angeles County. Using the Hilton, Farnknopf & Hobson (HFH) residential rate report from September 1997, the average Page 7 12/29/99 base rate (exclusive of various city fees) throughout the county of Los Angeles is about $12.27 per month. This includes both private and public collection, and such expensive routes as Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Palos Verdes, Avalon (the island of Catalina), and Rancho Palos Verdes, where rates are double the cost in other jurisdictions. This somewhat skews the results to the high end, which is helpful for us in illustrating the point of cost. Additionally, the base rate in all of the reporting cities includes recycling and yard waste collection, many of whom now offer automated, three - barrel systems which may have decreased costs. Diamond Bar does not regulate rates. Its residential monthly base rates range from $13.25 to $14.42 per month. While not exactly a mechanism for comparison, it can be stated that collection cost is a function of the number of stops. The larger the number of stops the more costs can be distributed to reduce the per unit price. This is simple economics. Therefore, in Diamond Bar, our rates should be higher than adjoining jurisdictions since haulers have to apportion costs among a smaller segment of the market. This can be extended to the commercial sector as well. Business accounts are normally more lucrative than residential accounts on a one for one basis. Awarding an exclusive arrangement for the commercial sector can help to decrease costs for residential units. JMH has done some analysis on the apportioning of costs in areas hit hard by landfill closures, and found that residential rate increases have been directly forestalled by distributing costs to the commercial sector. On the other hand, the business community may not be enthusiastic with a system that allows hauler(s) to distribute costs in a way seemingly adverse to business. Therefore, the open market system might be perceived as more business friendly. For those cities that have reported rates in the HFH study (about 68 out of 88 jurisdictions), 29 or 43%, charge greater than the average base rate of $12.27, but only 17 or 25% report charging greater than Diamond Bar's average base rate of $13.84. This includes six cities offering municipal collection of refuse and recycling, which traditionally has always cost more than private collection due to economy of scale considerations. Based on this, it would appear that Diamond Bar's average base rate may not be competitive with rates currently charged in all other cities reporting in the County. If we Page 8 12/29/99 were to compare with all other reporting privately hauled' cities, then the average base rate of $12.27 still compares unfavorably with the lowest rate possible in Diamond Bar of $13.25. It is noteworthy that the comparison is between Diamond Bar, an open city, with 64 other closed systems. However, this seems to confirm the view that economy -of - scale influences rates or commercial sectors subsidize residential rates. However, a casual review of commercial bin rates supplied to the City via the existing permittees show that commercial waste hauling is just as expensive for businesses in the City as it is for residential units. In those cities with more than one permitted or franchised hauler, the base rate and total rates are often averaged to create one publicly identified rate. If more than one hauler is present, then the service is distributed geographically to eliminate multiple haulers on single streets. Therefore this is not an aspect that can be compared with Diamond Bar. Diamond Bar's average total rate of $13.84 would rank it above the median of rates reported by cities in the HFH study (LA County only). If Diamond Bar were to institute a franchise fee, then its refuse rate would be even higher. Please be advised that this is an extremely rough analysis of cost since there are many discrepancies in the data reported by the cities, and the costs reported may or may not be accurate. In addition, there are many variables as to why costs differ among cities including geography, population, demographics, collection characteristics, and distance to landfills. In addition, costs have changed since 1997. However, it can be stated that if the free enterprise system were operating exactly as theory would indicate, Diamond Bar's rates should be among the lowest in the County. This is not the case. In addition, the City is losing the potential for significant revenues that could be derived from a franchise system for solid waste collection. Again, it must be stated in fairness that the smaller market segment afforded to each hauler precludes offering a lesser price due to economy -of -scale considerations. Other pros for the exclusive arrangement is that it is easier to set up and coordinate for street sweeping, scheduling of collection, consistency in program, and several other items summarized in Table 1. 1 Cities' residential waste is normally hauled municipally (i.e., city vehicles) or privately (i.e., private contractor or franchisee). Page 9 12/29/99 Timelines — A clear cut advantage for the open market system is the issue of timelines. Obviously, since the open market system already exists, then it is not necessary to solicit bids, change permittees, or alter other aspects of collection. On the other hand, there are some negative issues with bidding for an exclusive hauler especially as time is short for AB 939 implementation. These include scheduling, discontinuance, RFP process, and phasing in of a new hauler. There are three likely timeline scenarios that could occur: 1) no change, 2) an informal process whereby the City develops RFP specifications, and negotiates with one or more haulers to get the desired rate, and 3) in the event that scenario 2 fails, a formal process whereby the City issues an RFP and obtains competitive bids. Each scenario is described below. A. No change: This requires the least amount of activity and decision making on the part of the City. The timetable would call for each hauler to submit its plan of action and implementation schedule in response to the new requirements. The biggest problems will result from multiple trucks and traffic, environmental impacts, and the various public education issues resulting from multiple programs. If this is the desired approach, then staff could begin implementing the new ordinance immediately, and the program could be up and running by June 30, 2000. Our planned schedule is as follows: • January 4`h CC meeting, during which CC decides between open and exclusive system • If open system is retained, then... • City develops new permits and schedule • Proceed with July 1, 2000 program start-ups B. Develop RFP specifications, and negotiate to get the desired rate: In this informal process scenario, the City would develop RFP specifications, but also allow the existing refuse hauler to submit its best price for service. If the submitted package were inadequate, based on staff review, then the City would be able to solicit other proposals. The plan for this scenario would be to allow one month for negotiation. If negotiations were fruitless, then the City could proceed with publishing and issuing the RFP specifications as discussed in Scenario C below. The specific schedule proposed is provided below: • January 4m CC meeting, during which CC decides between open and exclusive system • If exclusive system selected for residential and commercial sectors, then... • Prepare bid specifications for Council review by February 1, 2000 Page 10 12/29/99 • Complete negotiations by March 1, 2000 • Assuming acceptable negotiated settlement, then prepare exclusive instrument by April 1 • Hauler provided with draft final exclusive instrument by May 1 • Other haulers noticed on May 1, 2000 to cease operations by June 30, 2000 (expiration of current permits) Hauler begins operations on or after September 2000 C. Negotiations fail and City needs to obtain proposals. In this scenario, we assume that negotiations fail, and the City needs to obtain competitive proposals. The timetable would be as identified in scenario B, but additional time would be needed to obtain proposals and select a contractor. We assume in this scenario that the RFP specifications are already created (see Scenario B) and ready for distribution by March 1, 2000. Our formal process is as follows: • January 4'h CC meeting, during which CC decides between open and exclusive system • If exclusive system selected for residential and commercial sectors, then... • Prepare bid specifications for Council review by February 1, 2000 • Assuming unacceptable negotiated settlement, then RFP distributed by April 1 • Haulers submit proposals by May 1 • City reviews and selects winning bid by June 1 • City finalizes agreement by July 1 • Hauler implements programs beginning December 2000 or January 2001 Staff believes that it will take about one month for this final selection and contract to be finalized for City Council approval, or by July 1, 2000. Given that it takes up to six months to order and obtain needed equipment such as barrels and bins, then the likely date that a completely new hauler could begin service might be about December 2000 or January 2001. If a hauler other than Waste Management is selected, then the implementation of the new hauler might be substantively delayed for up to five years based on the issue of discontinuance. Based on state law, when a community decides to make an open system exclusive, it must provide up to five years notice of discontinuance to any lawfully operating hauler who is collecting waste in the community and has done so continually for a period of at least three years. The question of whether Waste Management would be entitled to a five year notice is currently under legal review. Another aspect of this latter scenario is that the City would likely need to enact an ordinance or fee resolution to allow it to govern rates. This could be done during the process of processing bids. Page 11 12/29/99 Waste prevention incentives — If the City were to let a permit for refuse and recycling services under the open system, it could specify that any service provider meet standard conditions of the permit system. This would include any incentives. Incentives are identified in the new ordinance, and include variable rates, where a SFR could pay less if they generate less waste. For a small hauling company in an open, competitive market, the requirements might be difficult to comply with when competing with larger firms. On the other hand, the open system might allow an unscrupulous operator to offer lower rates than existing hauler(s), then curtail programs; saying residents would not participate. It would be extremely difficult for the City to prove its case and terminate its operating permit without a lengthy legal battle. The advantage of the exclusive system is that the City only has to deal with one hauler in terms of reporting, monitoring, programs, and rates. This may increase the consistency and hence the viability of the programming. Institutional impacts — Given that the residential sector's refuse is now collected by a single hauler (about 99%), then the overall impact of going to one hauler seems relatively minor. It could be argued that in the absence of any other considerations, the existing system is fine and need not be changed. However, the existing level of the monthly rate begs some adjustment and there is the matter of compliance with AB 939. In a single hauler system it would be far easier and probably less expensive to implement standardized programs. Also, and most importantly, the existing system most likely will not achieve the goal of 50% diversion as mandated by AB 939 (our current rate is 34% in 1998). However, there are very real impacts that should be considered by the City Council. Traffic is one aspect. Normally, the more haulers operating, the more truck traffic is generated. In addition, the more haulers operating, the greater the number of trucks required by the diversion program. If we have three haulers operating, and all three offer three standardized barrels, then we could expect nine trucks to pass by any given house on any given route weekly. This raises a concern with the City's ability and need to schedule street sweeping on a regular basis. Besides the traffic, there is the issue of environmental impacts. Air pollution, energy consumption, water pollution, litter, and noise may all be exacerbated by additional trucks demanded of multiple haulers. Page 12 12/29/99 Liability is another issue that is greater with large numbers of haulers. If there are more haulers and more trucks to consider, then the burden on staff is greater to assure minimum liability by the City. Whether to permit, contract, or franchise is less of an issue but still important. Franchise confers a right upon an entity to collect refuse and recyclables. Contracting gives an entity an exclusive legal mechanism to haul materials. Permitting merely permits an entity to collect based on some preconceived rules and requirements. Length of term is an important consideration in that 5 to 7 years allows haulers to properly amortize rolling stock and barrels/bins. Any longer term probably benefits the hauler more so than the City. The City's options are open to any of these considerations. There are no limits on decisions. One of the more important aspects is the opportunity for a city to obtain needed revenues from fees. Fees may include revenues obtained from gross receipts, a fixed percentage of business gross regardless of total revenues. At present, there is no revenue from the permitting process. Any open or exclusive system can yield similar revenues. Finally, there is the question of what the existing code allows or does not allow with respect to permitting or franchising. The code reserves the right of the City to enact a franchise. It also enables the City to permit collection for any term and to any qualified entity. While it does not set rates, there is a clause that requires permittees to inform the City 60 days in advance of any rate change. If the City were to award an exclusive arrangement, it would most likely have to enact additional code provisions to address the control of rates, since there would no longer be an "open market." Findings There is a likely need at this juncture to modify the existing solid waste and recycling ordinance to give the City authority to set rates, although the code already gives authority to the City Manager to extend permits of any duration to haulers in the context of public need and safety, and the code allows the City to award an exclusive franchise. A key factor to the findings is that one hauler currently services nearly the entire single family residential sector, and the majority of multi -family residences as well. This will create an issue of what happens if an exclusive contract is awarded to a firm other than the existing residential hauler. It could take up to five years to make a transition from the Page 13 12149/99 current to a new hauler; as indicated above, this issue is currently under legal review. While this could be awkward, it should not interfere with the process of implementing the new programs, as any hauler permitted under discontinuance would still need to conform or risk immediate termination of permit. Since the City did receive an approval of the Integrated Waste Management Board for the 1995 and 1996 years, this gives the City some leeway on when our new programs must be implemented. So long as the programs are implemented within the calendar year 2000, the City can certify to the Board that it has made a good faith effort for year 2000, the final year of compliance according to AB 939. While the City's programs can be implemented within both open and exclusive systems, the high incidence of compliance orders for open systems indicates that their diversion achievement is less than exclusive systems where there is more control on waste. Prior to making a decision, the City Council should carefully consider the aforementioned issues. While an exclusive system is more desirable than an open one, the City already has a de facto exclusive arrangement due to market demand. This makes selection of negotiation or bidding scenarios both attractive. Finally, while there is no absolute need to award an exclusive arrangement to a single hauler (some cities do award multiple franchises) to implement the programs, keeping the system open would require a greater effort on the part of the City to "police" the system of haulers and to assure continuity. This likewise is a concern if the City were to want to award multiple contracts or franchises. Staff would not recommend more than two haulers. Recommendation: That City Council review this report and make an appropriate determination as to the status of the solid waste collection and recycling system. Page 14 12/29/99 AMC/ --f 7' 1 MEMORANDUM TO: All Solid Waste Pennibees FROM: J. Michael Huls, REA, Integrated Environmental Services Coordinator DATE: November 23,19" RE: Solid Wash Disposal Tonnage by Sector for 1998 Permittees have asked for the latest data on solid waste disposal in the City of Diamond Bar (City). Based on Information provided by all permittees, the Disposal Reporting System, and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board), the City has compiled a reasonably accurate portrait of solid waste disposed. In 1998, the City reportedly disposed 54,241 tons of refuse, according to official records of the Board. Official solid waste permittees' reports identified a total of 44,402 tons collected for disposal from all generating sectors. The differential of 9,839 tons (Board total minus permittees' totals) is likely the result of self -haul (special permitted and non -permitted entities). Incidentally, the City's official 1998 diversion rate is 34% as identified by the Board. It is not known as to the origin by sector of the self -haul total. The permittees' aggregate quantity of 44,402 tons is probably distributed as follows: Single family type accounts` = 30,874 tons • Multifamily bin accounts = 5,676 tons • Commercial bin accounts = 6,659 tons Roll off bin accounts = 1,193 tons • Repnsembz a combined total from aM b4tMi wYW mmidattial aecoonts InskWing sagma4 mliy reeidanes InFRs) pix mufti-hmMy nsidasres (MFRS) Mwn hens and condos. SFR& proh&W 60counMd for about 24,000 tons, leaving 6,974 dlspesad hon MFR lown hors and condos. 100"e /s DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Huff and. Board of Directors FROM: Linda G. Magnuso�f, Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, January 4, 2000 DATE: December 28, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated January 4, 2000 for the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated January 04, 2000 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID VOUCHERS TOTAL 610 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND .00 27,868.68 27,868.68 REPORT FOF'. ALL FLINrjf-:-, APPROVED BY: Finance Director Imm Robert S. Huff Chairman Terrence L. Belanger/ / Wen Chang u Executive Director Vice Chairman -------� 27,868.68 REPORT TOTAL PREPAlDE ,00 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS REPORTTOTAL DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RUN DAT[: 12/28/1999 16:56:03 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 1 DUE THRU: Vl�4/2�O0 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOC 6107110'42315— :EMBRSHP OUE6'C MGR 375.00 TOTAL PREPAlDS .VO TOTAL VOUCHERS 375'0C TOTAL DUE VENDOR 375.OV KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 610,7110-44OVS'- 9366 Cm00oZ PROF SVCS'ECON DEv 5TRTSC 13111. 18 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 ' TOTAL VOUCHERS 27,136.18 T3TAL ',UE VEWDOR 27,136.18 ROSENOWSPEVACEKCROUP INC 6107110'44000- NOV Y9 RDA SVC2'TOOLY/0PUS AUDIT 357,50 TOTAL PREPAl0S .0V TOTAL VOUCHERS 357,5O TOTAL DUE VENDOR 357.50 REPORT TOTAL PREPAlDE ,00 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS REPORTTOTAL