Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/4/1999City Council Agendv U L1JII IJ 11 Ii.1C '� Tuesday, May 4,1999 5:00 p.m. — Closed Session — CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District Main Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mayor Wen Chang Mayor Pro Tem Debby O'Connor Council Member Eileen Ansari Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Huff City Manager Terrence L. Belanger City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Lynda Burgess Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS) PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of interest which are within the subject matterjurisdiction of the Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in person to the City Clerk Asa general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Council. Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks towards Council Members or other citizens. Comments which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City Council and will not be tolerated Your 000peration is greatly appreciated In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public comment or items previously considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Committee meetings.) In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Council meeting. In case of emergenmcy, or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings the Council may act on an item that is not on the posted agenda. CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect to a regular or special meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. A Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member of the staff thereo& tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting. B. A breach of the peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting. C. Disobedience of any lawful order of the Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from addressing the Board; and D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72 hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer through a phone modem, Every meeting of the City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules ofthe Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Information (909) 860.2489 NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON TIM AGENDA. Next Resolution'No. 99-28 Next Ordinance No. 05(1999) 1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 p.m. CC -8 (a) Initiation of Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9 (1 case) 2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m., May 4, 1999 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor INVOCATION: Monsignor James Loughnane, St. Denis Catholic Church ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Proclaiming May 8, 1999 as "Fire Service Day." 3.2 Proclaiming May, 1999 as "Water Awareness Month." 3.3 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the members of the IOth Anniversary Celebration Committee. 3.4 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Art and Dottie Logan, upon their retirement from the Volunteer Patrol. 3.5 Introduction of L.A. County Sheriff Department Diamond Bar Team Lieutenant, Lt. Joseph Maxey. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 2 MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 2 complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - May 11, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 COMMUNITY/CIVIC CENTER TASK FORCE - May 12, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - May 13, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - May 18, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ROUNDUP - May 22, 1999 - West Covina City Maintenance Yard - 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., 825 Sunset Ave., Covina. 5.6 TOWN HALL MEETING (Y2K)- June 5, 1999 - 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 6.1.1 Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - Approve as amended. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 - Receive & File. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of March 23, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Planning Division 6.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 11, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Engineering Division MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 3 6.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.4.1 Regular Meeting of February 25, 1999 - Receive & File. 6.4.2 Regular Meeting of March 25, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: community Services Division 6.5 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of $359,449.10. Requested by: Finance Division 6.6 TREASURER'S REPORT - Submitted for City Council review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for March, 1999. Recommended Action: Review and approve. Requested by: Finance Division 6.7 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Albert E. Saldana on November 25, 1998. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the Claim for Damages and refer the matter for further action to the City's Risk Manager. Requested by: City Clerk 6.8 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS INSTALLATION ON DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT MONTEFINO AVENUE AND QUAIL SUMMIT DRIVE - On June 16, 1998, Council awarded a contract in the amount of $159,700 to Pro Tech Engineering Corp., with a contingency of $16,000, for traffic signal installation on D.B. Blvd. at Montefino Ave. and Quail Summit Dr., for a total authorization amount of $175,700. On December 1, 1998, Council approved a change in the scope of work in the amount of $10,874, resulting in a total authorization amount of $186,574. In accordance with the Final Account Summary, an amount of $14,440 will be deducted accordingly from the 10% retention. The construction contract amount, before the deduction, is $185,984.38. The final construction contract amount will be $171,554.38. Due to various issues and late completion of the project, a deduction of $14,440 from the contract amount is requested. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 4 Recommended Action: It is` recommended that the City Council authorize staff to deduct $14,440 from the contract amount, accept the work performed by Pro Tech Engineering Corp., authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release $4,159.44 of the retention amount. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.9 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMBUSHERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - Council awarded an engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers St. and Meadowglen Rd. Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with the L.A. County Department of Public Works to approve storm drain and NPDES requirements. DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for the Ambushers St. Project. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving plans and specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvement Project and authorize and direct the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.10 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AREA 1 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - The Area 1 Slurry Seal Project is the first year of the new.5-year Pavement Management Program. The new and enlarged Area 1 has a total pavement area of 3,810,000 sq. ft. An emphasis has been placed to rehabilitate highly distressed residential streets as identified in the Pavement Management Program. To maximize the City's resources and extend service life of the streets, the consultant and staff are recommending a Cape Seal approach to rehabilitate some of the distressed streets. The Cape Seal approval involves an initial ARAM (Asphalt Rubber & Aggregate Membrane) overlay followed by the slurry seal. Additionally, certain areas where the curb and gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches have displayed severe cracks/settlement will be reconstructed. The entire project has been incorporated within one set of project drawings, specifications and bid document package, which has been prepared by GFB-Friedrich & Associates. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 5 Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project and authorize and direct the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. Requested by: Engineering Division 7. PUBLIC -HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m:; or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: (a) RESOLUTION N0. 96-41C: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. The City established the parking penalty schedule through the adoption of Resolution No. 96-41. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to conform to Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. Continued from April 20, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 96-41C amending the parking penalty schedule for parking penalties and late payment fees for parking violations. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions of the Title and to improve traffic safety within the City. The amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. Continued from April 20, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, waive full reading and approve first MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 6 reading by title only, Ordinance No. 0X(1999) regarding traffic regulations and amending Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic. Requested by: City Manager 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A -RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Amrut Patel of Sasak Corp. has requested approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Ave. into 21 single-family lots: On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 6, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 20, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time. Requested by: Planning Division 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 QUITCLAIM OF PROPERTY BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR PROPERTY ALONG BREA CANYON ROAD - The matter of ownership of the 6.58+/ - acres of Brea Canyon Rd. property which was sold to Arciero/Woodbridge, has been raised by the County. The City declared the City -owned Brea Canyon Rd. property, comprised of 4.01 acres of former water district property and 2.57 acres of excess right -of way (6.58+/- acres) surplus in Summer, 1997. Thereafter, all relevant public agencies were duly notified of the City's intention to sell surplus property. No comment, objection or exercise of first right of refusal demand was received from any agency. After close of the required notice period, the City sold the property to Arciero/Woodbridge in September, 1997. In 1998, the County Public Works Dept. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 7 wrote the City to indicate that about 2.517+/- acres of the land that was sold belong to the County. The County made a demand for the appraised value of the land - $196,000. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve payment of $196,000 to the County, as consideration for quitclaim .of 2.57+/- acres of property located, generally, between Diamond_ Crest Ln. and Sapphire, along Brea Canyon Rd. using one of the following three alternatives: 1) Use General Fund unappropriated reserves; 2) Sell $300,000 of Proposition A Transit Fund reserves to substantially fund the reimbursement or 3) Pay from the Parks & Facilities Development Fund, which is the fund in which the proceeds of the sale of the 6.58+/- acres were placed. Requested by: City Manager RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Next Resolution No. RA99-05 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, C/Ansari 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public .that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Agency Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Redevelopment Agency. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of $19,206.61. Requested by: Finance Division MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 8 3.3 TREASURER'S REPORT - Submitted for the Redevelopment Agency Board's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for March, 1999. Recommended Action: Review and approve. Requested by: Finance Division 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: S. OLD BUSINESS: 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL FETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 1 Vy Next Resolution No. 99 - Next Ordinance No. (1999) 1. CLOSED SESSION: 61-eo 2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m., May 4, 1999 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor INVOCATION: Monsignor James Loughnane St. Denis Catholic Church ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera Huff, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: r 3.1 Proclaiming May 8, 1999 as "Fire Service Day." ,) 3.2 �,, 6', -kh(A :3 `1 IN GCt V, 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - May 11, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - May 13, 1999 - 7:00 P.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - May 18, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.1.1 Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - Approve as amended. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 - Receive & File. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of March 23, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Planning Division 6.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 11, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.4.1 Regular Meeting of February 25, 1999 - Receive & File. 6.4.2 Regular Meeting of March 25, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Community Services Division 6.5 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of Requested by: Finance Division 6.6 TREASURER'S REPORT - March, 1999 - Receive & File. Requested by: Finance Division 6.7 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Albert E. Saldana on November 25, 1998. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the Claim for Damages and refer the matter for further action to the City's Risk Manager. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 3 Requested by: City Clerk 6.8 NOTICE OF COMPLETION - Signalization at Diamond Bar Blvd. at Quail Summit and Montefino - Recommended Action: Requested by: Engineering Division 6.9 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICIATIONS FOR GOLDEN SPRINGS STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT - Recommended Action: Requested by: Engineering Division 6.10 PARKING ON FALLOWFIELD - Recommended Action: Requested by: Engineering Division 6.11 PURCHASE OF SIGNAL POLES FOR DIAMOND CREST LN. AT BREA CANYON ROAD - Recommended Action: Requested by: Engineering Division 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as a)matters may be heard. 1) r �(-0,0nh(\Q,j })H -k arkiYi�VeC12rsa�`,.�r� -r�vQ(w 0, . 8. OLD BUSINESS: 9. NEW BUSINESS: RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Next Resolution No. RA99-XX 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, C/Ansari 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the MAY 4, 1999 M 5. W PAGE 4 public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Agency Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Redevelopment Agency. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of Requested by: PUBLIC HEARINGS: OLD BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: Finance Division 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: M i vee W I K DATE: ADDRESS: 5 BSS 6- LA ORGANIZATION: ,2 c � eCA 13cge IS Ca AGENDA #/SUBJECT. 1 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL 'TO: CITY CLERK FROM: �_�'�-•-.�--'' DATE: ADDRESS: d PHONE:_ K /-� /J ,J ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Sig ture VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: Y �-�c �Y a •r? DATE: 1 ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: �- AGENDA #/SUBJECT: C' `J� 1 h i a L I L: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. kC( Sigr afure VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: �./D%'`� i'� ' DATE: , ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT:, I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: - Ca; C J'fi+/✓�� �1L DATE: 6 — ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 71' I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. i Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: S 1 PHONE: �,66> 6 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. { Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE. ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: A gyrei I —V I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please h the Council name and address as written above. Signature Minutes reflect my CITY OF DIAMOND BAR "QUICK CAP" MINUTES MAY 4, 1999 Next Resolution No. 99-28 Next Ordinance No. 05(1999) 1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M. CC -8 (a) Initiation of Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) Conference with Legal Counsel -- Anticipated Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9 (1 case) 2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:37 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Assistant Fire Chief Gil Herrera INVOCATION: Monsignor James Loughnane, St. Denis Catholic Church Mayor Chang announced that the City filed a lawsuit today against the Lanterman Developmental Center. CA/Jenkins - special council filed for Preremptory Writ of Mandate against the State regarding the Lanterman Expansion Project. Council Member O'Connor was not included in the lawsuit because her home is within the boundary of Lanterman and she may have a conflict of interest issue. This matter is presently being researched. If no conflict is found, she will be included as a cc -petitioner in the matter. With regard to the other threatened litigation, no reportable action was taken. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney; James DeStefan.o, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: CM/Belanger suggested moving Item 6.8 from Consent Calendar to Old Business. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Proclaimed May 8, 1999 as "Fire Service Day." 3.2 Proclaimed May, 1999 as "Water Awareness Month." 3.3 Presented Certificates of Recognition to the members of MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 2 the 1Oth Anniversary Celebration Committee - Alison Meyers, YMCA; Nancy Stinson & Joe Dunn, Century Communications; Orien Pagan & Larry Tanouye, Chamber of Commerce; Robert Zirbes and Eric Stone, DBIA; Patty Anis, Yvonne Pruitt and Karen Holder, Parks & Recreation Commissioners; Wendy Bowman, Marsha Roa, Bob Rose, Lillian Orejel, City staff and Mark St. Amant, Walnut Sheriff. 3.4 Presented Certificates of Recognition to Art and Dottie Logan, upon their retirement from the Volunteer Patrol. 3.5 Introduced L.A. County Sheriff Department D.B. Team Lieutenant, Lt. Joseph Maxey. Motion by C/Ansari, seconded by C/Herrera to add the following to the agenda. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. 3.6 Proclaimed May 9-15, 1999 as "Sheriff's Appreciation Week." 4. PUBLIC COHMNTS: Sharman Amani - 'Presented gift from D.B. Baha'i community - "A Statement by the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United States" called "Two Wings of a Bird." Kim Chapman re Lanterman Expansion Project - recently read Lanterman's Plan for handling forensic patients. Forensic patients can be patients previously convicted of crimes and can be patients from the Youth Authority. Severe behavioral patients will not be housed within the 16' fences. Asked residents to call or fax Governor Davis to urge him to oppose the project. She announced that on the coming Saturday, at 10:00 at Highland Valley and D.B. Blvd., a large rally will be held. Petitions will be available for signing. Don Gravdahl re document produced by Environmental Services Agency, published in January 1999, which answers questions that the public has been asking. Booklet outlines which patients and how many of them will be going to which facilities. Asked the public to obtain copies of the document. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes - Recommended that the Council ask the Sheriff to place photographic equipment at signaled intersections. Look into whether Lanterman has a method of controlling and locking up the patients to be brought in with severe behavioral problems, but are not forensic patients. Judy Messa - Poly High School - also concerned about her safety in getting to and from school at Cal Poly. Lives close to the project. MAY 4, 1999 0 meP PAGE 3 Joseph Farrell - Reiterated the importance of the Lanterman Plan document. The EIR only addressed impacts to the residents of Pomona, not D.B. Martha Bruske - Concerned about protocol. Is this a Council meeting or a Town Hall meeting? Wally Langan - Lives very close to Lanterman. There are still a lot of people in D.B. unaware of the Lanterman proposal. All local politicians are on the side of the resident's in this matter and concentration needs to be focused toward State representatives. Need to flood Sacramento with letters and faxes, phone calls, etc. Jeff Koontz, Exec. Dir., Chamber of Commerce - May 20 Mixer at W.V. Water, 5:30 - 7:30; May 25 1't Small Business Seminar at AQMD in Room CC -6; Legislative Meeting, 2nd Thursday of month at D.B. Golf Course. RECESSED AT 7:41 P.M. RECONVENED AT 8:00 P.M. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - May 11, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 COMMUNITY/CIVIC CENTER TASK FORCE - May 12, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - May 13, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - May 18, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ROUNDUP - May 22, 1999 - West Covina City Maintenance Yard - 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., 825 Sunset Ave., Covina. 5.6 TOWN HALL MEETING (Y2K)- June 5, 1999 - 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved by C/Ansari, seconded by C/Herrera to approve the Consent Calendar with the except of Item Nos. 6.8 and 6.10. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. 6.1 APPROVED OF MINUTES - 6.1.1 Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - As amended. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - As submitted C/Ansari abstained from voting approval on 8.3 on. 6.2 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 4 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of March 23, 1999. 6.3 RECEIVED & FILED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 11, 1999. 6.4 RECEIVED & FILED PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.4.1 Regular Meeting of February 25, 1999. 6.4.2 Regular Meeting of March 25, 1999. 6.5 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of $359,449.10. Reduce by 126.64. 6.6 REVIEWRD & APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT - for March, 1999. 6.7 REJECTED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Albert E. Saldana on November 25, 1998 and referred the matter for further action to the City's Risk Manager. 6.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-28: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMBUSHERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - and authorized and directed the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.10 RESOLUTION NO. 99-29: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AREA 1 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - The Area 1 Slurry Seal Project is the first year of the new 5 -year Pavement Management Program. The new and enlarged Area 1 has a total pavement area of 3,810,000 sq. ft. An emphasis has been placed to rehabilitate highly distressed residential streets as identified in the Pavement Management Program. To maximize the City's resources and extend service life of the streets, the consultant and staff are recommending a Cape Seal approach to rehabilitate some of the distressed streets. The Cape Seal approval involves an initial ARAM (Asphalt Rubber & Aggregate Membrane) overlay followed by the slurry seal. Additionally, certain areas where the curb and gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches have displayed severe cracks/settlement will be reconstructed. The entire project has been incorporated within one set of project drawings, specifications and bid document package, which has been prepared by GFB-Friedrich & Associates. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 5 Recommended Action: Moved by C/Huff, seconded by MPT/O'Connor to adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project, as amended and authorize and direct the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: (a) RESOLUTION NO. 96-41C: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. The City established the parking penalty schedule through the adoption of Resolution No. 96-41. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to conform to Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. Continued from April 20, 1999. M/Chang re -opened the Public Hearing. There being no public testimony offered, M/Chang closed the Public Hearing. Moved by C/Herrera, seconded by C/Ansari, to adopt Resolution No. 96-41C amending the parking penalty schedule for parking penalties and late payment fees for parking violations. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 05(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions of the Title and to improve traffic safety within the City. The amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. Continued from April 20, 1999. MAY 4, 1999 1! 91 M0A KI Moved by C/Herrera, seconded by MPT/O'Connor to waive full reading and approve first reading by title only, Ordinance No. 05(1999) regarding traffic regulations and amending Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99-30: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Amrut Patel of Sasak Corp. has requested approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Ave. into 21 single-family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 6, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16,, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 20, 1999. Jan Dabney, representing Mr. Patel - In response to Dr. Lawrence Rhodes, CA/Jenkins stated that he reviewed the letter received from Mr. Patel's attorney at the last meeting and sent a letter requesting clarification. Dan Wildish, representing Mr. Patel - asked for reconsideration of the matter. Disagreed with CA/Jenkins' interpretation of the case law in the matter. Moved by C/Ansari, seconded by C/Herrera to adopt Resolution No. 99-30, as amended, Denying An Extension Of Time For Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 For Property Located East Of Morning Sun Avenue and North Of Pathfinder Road. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll call vote. 6.8 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS INSTALLATION ON DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT MONTEFINO AVENUE AND QUAIL SUMMIT DRIVE - On June 16, 1998, Council awarded a contract in the amount of $159,700 to Pro Tech Engineering Corp., with a contingency of $16,000, for traffic signal installation on D.B. Blvd. at Montefino Ave. and Quail Summit Dr., for a total authorization amount of $175,700. On December 1, 1998, Council MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 7 approved a change in the scope of work in the amount of $10,874, resulting in a total authorization amount of $186,574. In accordance with the Final Account Summary, an amount of $14,440 will be deducted accordingly from the loo retention. The construction contract amount, before the deduction, is $185,984.38. The final construction contract amount will be $171,554.38. Due to various issues and late completion of the project, a deduction of $14,440 from the contract amount is requested. Mike Niknaps, President, ProTech Engineering - Explained reasons for the delays in completion of the project and requested that liquidated damages not be deducted from this contract amount. John Huey, Inspector - Explained reasons for inspection problems and stated that he had to temporarily shut down the project due issues related to the quality of work performed by the contractor. Motion by C/Huff, seconded by C/Herrera to authorize staff to deduct $14,440 from the contract amount, accept the work performed by Pro Tech Engineering Corp., authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release $4,159.44 of the retention amount. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 QUITCLAIM OF PROPERTY BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR PROPERTY ALONG BREA CANYON ROAD - The matter of ownership of the 6.58+/ - acres of Brea Canyon Rd. property which was sold to Arciero/Woodbridge, has been raised by the County. The City declared the City -owned Brea Canyon Rd. property, comprised of 4.01 acres of former water district property and 2.57 acres of excess right -of way (6.58+/- acres) surplus in Summer, 1997. Thereafter, all relevant public agencies were duly notified of the City's intention to sell surplus property. No comment, objection or exercise of first right of refusal demand was received from any agency. After close of the required notice period, the City sold the property to Arciero/Woodbridge in September, 1997. In 1998, the County Public Works Dept. wrote the City to indicate that about 2.517+/- acres of the land that was sold belong to the County. The County made a demand for the appraised value of the land - $196,000. C/Ansari suggested sending a letter to the Board of Supervisors expressing the City's dissatisfaction with MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 8 this situation. Martha Bruske - Don't take money out of General Fund; isn't it illegal to use from the Prop A funds? Recommended using Parks & Facilities Development funds. MPT/O'Connor agreed that the money should come from Parks & Facilities fund since that's where the money the City received for the property came from. C/Huff suggested that the City sell Prop A funds since there is a large surplus in that fund at this time. C/Ansari further suggested that the money be withdrawn from the Parks & Facilities fund. C/Herrera agreed that the payment should be made from Parks & Facilities fund. C/Huff disagreed with sending a letter to the County. He suggested that a less formal communication be made. Motion by C/Herrera, seconded by C/Ansari to approve payment of $196,000 to the County, as consideration for quitclaim of 2.57+/- acres of property located, generally, between Diamond Crest Ln. and Sapphire, along Brea Canyon Rd. from the Parks & Facilities Development Fund, which is the fund in which the proceeds of the sale of the 6.58+/- acres were placed. Motion carried 4-1 (C/Huff voting no) by Roll Call vote. RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 10:55 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, C/Ansari. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger; Executive Director; Mike Jenkins, Agency Attorney; James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved by AM/Huff, seconded by AM/Herrera to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote (C/Ansari abstained from approval of 3.1). 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999 - As submitted. MAY 4, 1999 PAGE 9 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated May 4, 1999 in the amount of $19,206.61. 3.3 REVIEWED AND APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT - for March, 1999. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Chair/Ansari suggested moving the Redevelopment Agency agenda in front of the City Council agenda. Agendize for May 18, 1999. ADJOURN REDEVELOPMENT MEETING: 11:00 P.M. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 11:00 P.M. 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: C/Herrera suggested that C/Huff be appointed to the Lanterman Task Force in place of MPT/O'Connor until the conflict of interest issue has been settled. Council consensus to place C/Huff on the Lanterman Task Force. 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the meeting at 11:37 p.m. in memory of Charles Abbott. 497 April 18, 1999 TO: City of Diamond Bar ATTENTION: Tommye Cribbins, Deputy City Clerk 99 APT 29 i i i I: 55 RE: Claim Saldana v. Diamond Bar Claimant Albert E. Saldana D/Event 5/25/98 Rec'd Y/Oifce 11/25/98 Our File S 100421 MRQ We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: • CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. sigCARL WARREN & COMPANY cc: CJPIA Attn: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANACEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive . Ste 400.Orange, CA 92868 Mail: P.O. Box 25180. Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone. (714) 740-7999 a (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 740-9412 PROPERTY No.--__-- TO PERSON OR PROPERT--- _- - INSTRUCTIONS I. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than,6 mos. after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.: ) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 yoeaz after the 8 r occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) Q -'��t 2J Pr 112: 52 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accider t. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SIMIT. 7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a) To: The City of Diamond Bar . ainr imant Ag��aimant (if natural person) Him Address of Claim t Ci and State c Home Telephone Number �N Business A dress of aimant �� ' �l z1- of S City and State Business Telephone Number Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. ��; W nen did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day: L �11 Where dif DAMAGE or INJURY occur? 6eicribe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this shee where a street names and addresses and measure ents it landmarks:, ppropriate, giv r � � l�,s�•'-c1a�� .tel C � �2. �`-c.c�.�;�sc1 �p� — �"vJ ��e-t+-xQ_ i i��L��:.'�i -'"Z"�-'–. '�– C� IJ .-� �� Cc„-� .1v c.�� , �C:�.. ✓ _� G {�—G�-.... � / � at particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage, if known: W at DAINL?GE cr INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full/ extent of injuries or damages claimed: 61 -If A What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, computation:P giving basis of Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis of computation: SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE Insurance payments received, if any, . names of Insurance Company; Expenditures made on account or accident or injury; (Date—Item) (Aniount Name and address of Witnesses. Doctors and Hospitals; READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle vehicle at the timeeofaccident b lthe arst saw ity vehicle; location City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location Y "B-1" and the pointt of impact by "XII of yourself or your NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS L Lj 7 FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS Signature of. Claimant or person filing on his behalf giving relationship to Claimant: SIDEWALK C1=1S MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (GOV. NDE SEC. 915a) . Date ■ ■A�� + age of Medicare Summar Notice' �QtCARE •`�IEDIOAIb August 14, 1998 ALBERT SALDANA 21104 GERNDAL ST WALNUT, CA 91789-3918 HELP STOP FRAUD: Always review your Medicare Summary Notice for correct information about the items or services you received. TOMER SERVICE INFORMATION . Your Medicare Number: 568-14-2992A If you have questions, write or call Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. P.O. Box 30540 Los Angeles, CA 90030 Local: (213) 748-2311 Toll-free: 1-800-675-2266 Other Languages: 1-800-438-7044 TTY for Hearing Impaired: 1-800-410-9600 This is a summary of claims processed from 07/15/98 through 08/14/98. PART B MEDICAL INSURANCE - ASSIGNED CLAIMS Dates of Service Services Provided Amount Charged Medicare Approved Medicare Paid Provider You May Be Billed See Notes Section Claim number 98209116064000 KENNETH S MACHADO DC, 1241 GRAND AVE STE C, a,b DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4447 Referred by: DR. KENNETH S MACHADO 05/27/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) $29.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 c,d 05/28/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 05/29/98 l Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/01/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/03/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/05/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/08/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/10/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/15/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/17/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/19/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/22/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d 06/24/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d Claim Total $381.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Claim number 98209116064010 KENNETH S MACHADO DC, 1241 GRAND AVE STE C, ab DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4447 Referred by: DR. KENNETH S MACHADO 06/26/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) $29.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 c,d 06/29/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940) 29.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,d Claim Total $58.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 THIS IS NOT A BILL - Keep this notice for your records. 0041234 82260195964 ALBERT SALDANA 21104 GERNDAL ST WALNUT CA 91789-3918 HELP STOP FRAUD: Always review your Medicare Summary Notice for correct information about the items or services you received. SERVICE INFORMATION Your Medicare Number: 568-14-2992A you have questions, write or call: Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. P.O. Box 30540 Los Angeles, CA 90030 Local: (213) 748-2311 Toll-free: 1-800-675-2266 Other Languages: 1-800-438-7044 TTY for Hearing Impaired: 1-800-410-9600 This is a summary of claims processed from 09/09/1998 through 10/09/1998. PART B MEDICAL INSURANCE - ASSIGNED CLAIMS Dates of Service Services Provided Amount Charged Medicare Approved Medicare Paid Provider You May Be Billed See Notes Section Claim number 98236124885000 KENNETH S MACHADO DC, 1241 GRAND AVE STE C, b,c DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4447 Referred by: DR. KENNETH S MACHADO 05/27/98 1 X-ray exam of shoulder (73030) $70.00 $0.00 $0.00 $70.00 d 05/27/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 05/27/98 1 X-ray exam of thorax spine (72070) 75.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 d 05/27/98 1 X-ray exam of ribs (71100) 70.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 d 05/28/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 05/29/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/01/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/03/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/05/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/08/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/10/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/15/98 l Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.10 5.53 06/17/98 1 Chiropractic manipulation (98940 -AT) 29.34 27.63 22.14 5.49 Claim Total $508.40 $27630 $221.04 $270.26 Notes Section: a Your claim was separated for processing. The remaining services may appear on a separate notice. b Your claim was separated for processing. The remaining services may appear on a separate notice. c This information is being sent to your private insurer(s). Send any questions regarding your benefits to them. (continued) THIS IS NOT A BILL - Keep this notice for your records. 0040659 82820189232 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99- A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TEKE FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS. The property owner/applicant, Armut Patel of Sasak Corporation, has filed an application for a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9. The project site is located east of Morning Sun Avenue and north of Pathfinder Road, Los Angeles County, Diamond Bar, California, as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Extension of Time WWI be referred to as the "Application". 2. On May 17, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 95-21 and 95-22 approving the applicant's project. On May 17, 1995 the map was conditioned to respond to evidence of unresolved geotechnical concerns upon the property. 3. On May 19, 1995 a landslide occurred upon the applicants property. 4. The adopted City Council Resolution Nos. 95-21 and 95-22 contained certain conditions precedent to the signature of the Mayor. The applicant satisfied the conditions and therefore, the Resolutions were signed by the Mayor on August 6, 1996. 5. On January 8, 1997, the Walnut Valley Unified School District approved an agreement with the applicant. The agreement provided for temporary access, temporary reciprocal encroachments, a permanent easement, exchange of property, and consent to the preparation and recordation of the final map. 6. The City Council approval was based on the applicant obtaining a permanent transfer of property from the Walnut Valley Unified School District to the applicant. The permanent transfer of property (approximately 3 acres) would allow the applicant access to the project site from Morning Sun Avenue and allow the applicant to expand the lot and pad size of lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, in order to comply with the required lot size and pad size. 7. The approved project would subdivide approximately 6.7 acres (owned by the applicant) and approximately 3 acres (owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District) into a 21 unit, single-family, residential development, along with the removal and replacement of oak and walnut trees and native vegetation according to the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program. 8. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL Maximum 3 Dwelling Units Per Acre). It is zoned Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size, 10,000 Square Feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -10,000-6U). 9. Generally, the following zones and uses surround the project site: to the north is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 15,000 Square Feet (R-1-15 000) Zone; and to the east is the Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -100,000-6i) and the Walnut Valley Unified School District property; to the south is the RPD -100,000-6U Zone; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size -8,500 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone. 10. The City Council project approval expired August 6, 1998. The applicant submitted a written request for a one year extension of time, prior to the expiration of the map, as required by the Subdivision Map Act and Title 21 of the Los Angeles County Code (the City Subdivision Ordinance). 11. On November 24, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. At that time and pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to December 8, 1998. On December 8, 1998, pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to January 12, 1999. 12. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission concluded its public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 99-01 recommending City Council approval of the Application. 13. On February 16, 1999, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which testimony was received from interested parties, including the applicant. The City Council concluded its public hearing on February 16, 1999. 14. Notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Vallev Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 27, 1999. Notice of the public hearing was mailed to 137 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January 20, 1999. OA B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this City Council hereby finds as follows: (a) Due to the Tract Map's design, 3 acres of property owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District is required for the Map's development as presented. Access to the project site through the Walnut Valley Unified School District property is essential. Without a permanent transfer of property from the School District to the applicant, the project site has no means of access. Additionally, in order to comply with the required lot and pad size, the permanent transfer of land, adjacent to the rear of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, from the School District to the applicant is also essential. Without the transfer of property, the Map cannot record. (b) The applicant has not demonstrated compliance with the conditions of approval. The following conditions of approval are required for final map approval/or map recordation: Resolution No. 95-21: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11. through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30., 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. Resolution No. 95-22: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11 through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30.; 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. (c) As a result of the landslide and subsequent grading activity the physical environment has changed. Evidence has not been presented to the City Council to support a finding that the earth movement has stabilized. (d) The applicant has not demonstrated through the completion of project conditions that the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed 21 unit residential development proposed. As a result, the design of the subdivision or improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (e) Further extension of the subject map is not warranted. The applicant should prepare and file a new map that addresses the foregoing unresolved concerns. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the City Council hereby denies the Application. With the denial of the extension of time, Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 expire and all privileges granted and related to these entitlements expire. The City Clerk shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of the Resolution, by certified mail, to: Amzut Patel, Sasak Corporation, 858 W. 9th Street, Upland, California 91785. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY 1999, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of May 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar 4 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 6, 1999 STUDY SESSION: 4:20 P.M. Room CC -2, SCAQMD a) Goals & Objectives b) Traffic Impact Solutions 1. CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 p.m. - Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the regular City Council meeting to order at 6:42 p.m. in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. CA/Jenkins reported that Council asked his office to fully investigate all avenues relative to the possibility of initiating litigation to oppose the expansion of the Lanterman facility. In addition, the City has engaged the services of another law firm to look into these issues as well, so that the City has the services of two separate law firms exploring all avenues relative to whether or not a sound basis exists to file a lawsuit to oppose the expansion project. Tomorrow, a lawyer will be traveling to Sacramento in order to inspect all of the State's files in connection with this expansion project. In addition, he has begun working closely to share information and theories with the City Attorney of Pomona. Pomona has directed its City Attorney to file litigation in this matter. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director, and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Kathleen Newe. INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Reverend Rex Wolins, Associate Pastor, Diamond Canyon Christian Church. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: CM/Belanger requested the following: a. Continue Item 7. 1, Public Hearing on Parking Penalty Schedule, to April 20, 1999. b. Continue Item 8.3, Resolution Denying an Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map 51253, to April 20, 1999. C. Continue Item 9. 1, Standardized Emergency Management Systems (SEMS) Multi -hazard Plan to April 20, 1999. d. Move Item 8.4, Resolution opposing the Establishment of a Forensic Treatment Program at Lanterman Developmental Center for discussion APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL prior to Public Comments. Council concurred with CM/Belanger's recommendations. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Introduction of new Team Lieutenant Brent Cannady, Walnut Sheriff Station - Continued indefinitely. 3.2 Proclaimed April 11-16, 1999 as Library Week. 3.3 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Earthquake Preparedness Month. 3.4 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 3.5 Presented City Tile to Robert Steelwagon, owner of the Shopping Center at Golden Springs Dr. and Lemon Ave. MATTERS TAKEN OUT OF ORDER: 8.4 LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER'S SERVICES FORENSIC EXPANSION PROJECT - A) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FORENSIC TREATMENT PROGRAM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORENSIC PATIENT SECURITY COMPOUND AT THE LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER - The State Department of Developmental Services has determined, and the State Legislature has approved the transfer of 75 forensic patients to the Lanterman Developmental Center. Phyllis Baca asked why, after a year and a half, is the Council suddenly opposing this project. She asked for a copy of the first letter received from Sacramento as well as other correspondence received by the City. She asked if Council was told to remain quiet about this matter. Martha Bruske said that Lanterman has experience in caring for clients and that the facility has not caused the area any harm in its 72 year history. She believed that this time should be used to discuss how all parties concerned could work together. She also believed that the facility's clients are better cared for in the hospital rather than in community homes. The State owns the property and could use the land for a prison or a facility in which to house sex offenders or the acutely mentally ill. Kim Chapman, 22713 Happy Hollow, said she lives in the neighborhood APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL that is situated closest to Lanterman - 1100 feet from the proposed expansion. She indicated that she and her neighbors have firsthand knowledge of Lanterman residents wandering aimlessly on the hill behind their homes and she cited several incidents that have occurred in her area. She urged the Council to hire an attorney to file a lawsuit on behalf of the residents of Happy Hollow Rd. against the State for improper notification of the project. Sue Sisk, 1087 Flintlock Rd., felt that Council and the State were grossly negligent in notifying the residents. She thanked Council for forming a Task Force to address the issue and she believed that there had been misrepresentation by Lanterman regarding the extent of the project. She felt that housing forensic patients is a type of "prison." She reported that more than 1250 residents signed petitions over the holiday weekend and she was in support of the proposed resolution opposing the Lanterman project. Michael Lin, real estate sales and property management, expressed concern about the safety of his friends and their families. He felt that the State failed to properly notify the residents of the project. He pointed out that other developers are required to give notice of proposed projects. He asked citizens to join him in standing up for their rights as taxpaying citizens to stop the project before it destroys the neighborhood community. Bob Watts, 23845 Strange Creek Dr., explained that his home is about 400 yards from the Lanterman Development Center's entrance. Between his home and Lanterman, is a retirement center and several families with children. He was concerned that it would take only one incident to cause harm to one of these residents. He thanked Council for helping to make the community safe and encouraged them to continue their course of action to get forensic patients located to a more rural area. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes asked for a definition of "forensic" as it applies to the Lanterman project. The community must do something to reduce the fear and anguish of the residents. Darla Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said that the City needs to address "behavioral health beds" as well as, "forensic" beds. Although these patients may not have committed crimes, they are still dangerous. Wally Lyman, 615 Firepit Dr., lives very dose to the Lanterman facility. He and other residents in his area were notified about the Lanterman project only about 10 days ago, not by an official agency, but by a flyer placed on their doors. He felt the residents should have received proper notification. Contrary to what he had been told, he believed that the project will adversely affect property values in the area. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL Betty Johnson, 546 EI Encino Dr., said she has always felt comfortable and safe in D.B. She asked Council to do its best to ensure the community's continued safety. Clyde Hennessee pointed out that the Chino Men's Facility is only 15 miles from D.B. Citizens need to be prepared for the worst possible situation. He asked why the Lanterman guards are not armed. Jennifer Hoey, 1104 Clouds Rest Dr., does not want to have to tolerate acceptance of this situation. She wants a safe living atmosphere for her family and her neighbors. She asked Council to do what is right. Fred Encinas, 716 North Looking Glass Dr., thanked Council for appointing him to the Task Force. He spoke about Pomona's lawsuit to stop the project. He read an article from the April 6 issue of the Daily Bulletin which quoted Councilman Robles of Pomona. He also read from an April 4 Daily Bulletin article regarding the project. He asked Council and the citizens to continue the fight to stop the project. He believed that Lanterman officials are not telling the truth about the project and wanted Council to expose the truth and ask Lanterman officials to stop the violence against protestors of the project. Craig Parks, 222 Gunsmoke Dr., said that this project sounds like a prison. He urged Council to do whatever they can to prevent this project from moving forward. C/Ansari agreed with Mrs. Bruske that Lanterman has been a good neighbor. However, when you hear that the project proposes that double 16' fences spaced 4' apart with four 28' high observation guard towers, double gated entry sally port with an access/ingress control building and a security staff of more than 30 personnel, it sounds like a prison to the community. She believed it is incumbent upon her to take a stand in opposition to the project because of the potential security risk to the community and the security of the current Lanterman clientele. She explained how the project was down- played to the community. Knowledge of the facts changes the tone of the Lanterman project. D.B. is no longer the rural area that it was 72 years ago when Lanterman was first established. She said she will fight to stop the project; however, there are only five Council Members and the citizens need to send letters and make telephone calls to the State's elected officials protesting the project. C/Herrera stated that on March 16, 1999, Council established a Task Force to meet with community members to discuss options regarding the Lanterman project. The last three weeks have been filled with a great deal of activity on the part of City staff and residents in opposing the project. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL The City has committed thousands of dollars toward that end and the five Council Members have been contacting individuals and officials in order to attempt to influence others to oppose the project. Last night, the Pomona City Council took a position to oppose the project and voted to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop the project. Pomona invited D.B. to join with them in the fight to stop the project. The City Attorney reported at the beginning of tonight's meeting that this Council had a closed session during which the Council directed the City Attorney to pursue D.B.'s options regarding the City of Pomona in filing a lawsuit to stop the project. This morning, she, MPT/O'Connor and Paula Lantz, Pomona City Council Member, appeared before the L.A. Board of Supervisors and urged them to adopt a position of opposition to the Lanterman expansion project. The vote was four Yes. Walnut City Council will consider the matter at its meeting tomorrow night (April 7). This Council and this City is doing everything it can to form a strong coalition. She asked CA/Jenkins to talk about the State's powers of authority regarding its programs. CA/Jenkins explained that the State is the paramount governmental authority and can do what it chooses with its property. The State does not have to comply with local zoning laws and the State has undertaking the authority and responsibility for the care of those persons with developmental disabilities including those who have committed crimes. The State has passed laws and adopted statutes and policies that dictate what type of facilities those persons are to be placed in and what types of standards judges must be guided by in the placement of such individuals when they are determined not to be competent to stand trial. The State has established facilities for the placement of those persons until they are in a position where they are competent to stand trial for the crimes that they have committed. Generally speaking, cities, as creatures of the State and subsidiary bodies of the State, have very little authority to stand in the way when the State sets its mind to use its property for those purposes, particularly when those purposes are determined to be the advancement of a State policy. As earlier stated, his firm has been asked to look at all possible avenues of opposition. The State is obligated to comply with environmental laws and a great deal of study has been started relative to whether the State has indeed complied with environmental laws in the approval of this facility. Ultimately, it becomes more of a political issue than a legal issue as far as the City is concerned. It may be that there are people who own property in the vicinity who may have other issues and other considerations that are not shared by the City. Those property owners are in a position to do whatever is necessary to protect themselves. The City can only participate in this matter with respect to assuring that the State has fully complied with environmental laws and has otherwise complied with all other requirements with which it must comply in going forward with a project of this kind. The Council has contacted elected officials at the State level in order to apply pressure to see what can be APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL done about changing the State's plans. However, it should not be forgotten that the law is clear that the State has plenary authority over cities. C/Huff believed the City was "snookered" about the project. The City relied upon the good will that it had developed with Lanterman over the years. When Lanterman speaks about forensic patients, it is on a very low-key level. As more information is received, the City becomes more concerned. By definition, this project is a "prison." He also expressed concern about the compromised good will of Lanterman and their recent tactics of confiscating video tapes. He stated that Council is committed to making this matter right. MPT/O'Connor said that each Council Member attends meetings on a daily basis which could be considered "secret" because they do not notify each and every resident. The Lanterman meetings were not secret meetings - they were attended by D.B., Pomona, Walnut, Cal -Poly, Sheriff Department, CHP and City of Pomona police department personnel. She read a letter she wrote on February 11, 1999 to Ruth Maples, Executive Director of Lanterman. She stated she attended the Lanterman meetings last year and she trusted what was said during the meetings. As time went on, she came to realize that the facts were not as originally presented. She recommended that language be added to the proposed Resolution that Council wishes to join forces with surrounding communities in fighting this matter and that the Resolution acknowledge that in the past Lanterman has been a good neighbor to the City of D. B. M/Chang spoke about the efforts of Council and staff to oppose this project. C/Huff expressed concern about adding language to the Resolution regarding Lanterman's previous record because the City cannot corroborate this information. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-16 opposing the establishment of a forensic treatment program and the construction of a forensic patient security compound at the Lanterman Developmental Center, with the following amendment: Following the sixth WHEREAS, insert and, "WHEREAS, the State of California failed to provide effective notice to the Diamond Bar community which is especially inexplicable in light of the failure to provide notice to surrounding communities related to other recent projects i.e.: Metropolitan Hospital in Norwalk and, "WHEREAS: the City of Diamond Bar will work in concert, with its neighboring cities (Pomona, Walnut and Industry), the County of Los Angeles, Cal Poly -Pomona, State elected officials, Congressional elected officials, other public agencies/institutions and community individuals and organizations, to oppose the Lanterman forensic expansion project." Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL AYES- COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None B) MATTER OF LANTERMAN AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT TASK FORCE MISSION STATEMENT - On March 30, 1999, the Task Force approved a Mission Statement related to the proposed Lanterman Forensic Project. David Bell expressed concern that the Task Force members who work for Lanterman are not working cohesively with the City's Task Force members. He asked that, in good faith, Council should remove the two Lanterman employees from the Task Force and appoint new members who are committed to stopping the project. Sue Sisk clarified the Mission Statement Task Force discussions. She believed that this is a working document only. C/Huff asked if it would be acceptable to the Task Force if the Council accepted the Mission Statement in the spirit with which it was made, i.e., to give direction to the Task Force. Could this be received and filed without the Council's approval? Some things are problematic to approve, such as "insure re -opening of the EIR." The City has hired an attorney to analyze it, legislators mounted a written campaign to re -open the EIR and the State said no. Other avenues to accomplish this are still being explored. It may be a better way to phrase it that "we can try our hardest." Also, "obtain injunction"—we may or may not be able to do that. We understand the spirit of the Statement. Ms. Sisk agreed that receipt and file of the Task Force Mission Statement by Council would be acceptable. Martha Bruske pointed out that Task Force members who work for Lanterman are D.B. residents. Joseph Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said he is a member of the Task Force and strongly believed that the Lanterman employees who are Task force members do not strongly support the views of the group and do not have the best interest of D.B. in mind. He outlined reasons why he is opposed to referring to Lanterman as a "good neighbor." Wally Lyman also believed that Lanterman employees should be asked to resign from the Task Force. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL Dr. Lawrence Rhodes stated that the Task Force cannot prevent Lanterman employees from being present during meetings. Bob Watts recommended that the City change the name of the Task Force to a name reflecting its opposition to the Lanterman project. Fred Encinas asked Council to publicize its opposition actions, reimburse the Task Force for its expenses and to more visibly and vocally show their outrage at this project. In response to C/Ansari, Mr. Encinas indicated that he would like the Council to request that Lanterman return the confiscated video tape to its rightful owner and to stop escalating violence against petitioners. Kim Chapman asked for a response to her question regarding whether the City will provide funding for legal services to represent the Happy Hollow residents. CM/Belanger stated that staff will contact Mrs. Chapman tomorrow morning regarding this matter. Linda Farrell spoke about the confrontation with Lanterman staff and clients while she was petitioning residents in front of Von's Market. M/Chang reminded the audience to focus on the agenda item. Joe Ruzicka stated that there about 900 children in the D.B. Little League bordering the railroad tracks and Sunset Crossing which is in close proximity to the proposed project and the district board is very concerned about their safety. The Little League does not have funding to provide protective measures from potential Lanterman escapees. MPT/O'Connor reminded the audience why the Task Force was established. She felt that Lanterman employees might be able to give the Task Force information it did not already have. She stated she will ask her Lanterman employee Task Force member to resign. However, Task Force meetings are public meetings and Lanterman employees may attend the meetings. C/Huff proposed adoption of the Mission Statement. He stated that the Task Force job is finished and he proposed formation of a committee to oppose the Lanterman Forensic Expansion with five members appointed by each Council Member. He read a suggested Mission Statement for the new committee: "The Mission of the Committee Against Lanterman Forensic Expansion, appointed by the D.B. City Council, is to establish and bring to bear a powerful and unified voice of elected officials and community members to ensure the safety and welfare of the community, APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL protect property values and preserve the socio-economic environment through the abolition of the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Expansion Project Secure Treatment Facility." CA/Jenkins stated that the dissolution of the Task Force and formation of a committee is not on the agenda and should be scheduled for the next Council meeting. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to accept the Mission Statement. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None MPT/O'Connor indicated that she had had many questions concerning the make up and activities of the Task Force. Further, she had some real legal issues with some of the things that the Task Force was doing. Before we form a new committee, we need to establish what the legal requirements are for the Task Force members. She stated that she was not ready for form a new Task Force until Council can define the Task Force's legal issues and whether they are on personal business or Task Force business. C/Huff moved, C/Herrera seconded, to consider the matter of the status of the Task Force an urgency matter to place upon the agenda discussion of the possibility of disbanding of the Task Force. Motion failed by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, M/Chang ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Martha Bruske reiterated that the Council failed to adequately notify the residents regarding the Lanterman project. Thom Pruitt stated that the Lanterman Expansion Project would potentially have an adverse effect on the D.B. Pop Warner Football and Cheerleader program in that some of the group's activities are held in the vicinity of the YMCA which is adjacent to the Lanterman facility. He announced that the Pop Warner Football organization will hold its annual Celebrity Invitation Golf Tournament on Monday, May 3 at the Via Verde Country Club. Carolyn Elfelt and Janet Roberts invited the Council and residents to participate in the DBHS stadium expansion festivities to be held on Friday and Saturday, April 16 and 17. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL Allen Wilson stated that the Friends of the Library Wine Tasting Soiree will be held on April 25 to raise funds for books and other community related library projects. Aaron Flisik reminded the Council that there is a need for a skateboard park in D. B. In response to Clyde Hennessee, MPT/O'Connor explained that the Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6 budget adjustment is the total amendment amount for the change in General Fund expenditures. Carol Willner, Lorbeer Middle School Principal, spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No_ 6.9. She suggested that the afternoon time be changed to 2:15 to 2:45 p.m. Joseph Farrell asked for an explanation of the vote to place an item on the agenda as an urgency item. Jeff Koontz, D.B. Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Grand Opening for the Hand Car Wash will be held on Saturday, April 17 adjacent to the Country Hills Towne Center. He spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6. He recommended that a neon sign be added for "No Right Turn" purposes that would be monitored by the crossing guard. Fred Encinas reiterated the need for press releases on Council Member's activities regarding Lanterman. He recommended that the Walnut Sheriff's Station be alerted to potential conflicts between residents and Lanterman employees. Sue Sisk asked for an explanation of legal issues regarding the Task Force. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 8, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - Tuesday, April 13, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 CITY 10th BIRTHDAY PARTY CELEBRATION - Sunday, April 18, 1999 - 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m., Peterson Park, 24142 E. Sylvan Glen Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, April 20, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 22, 1999 - 7:00 APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.6 CURBSIDE BULKY ITEM COLLECTION - Saturday, April 24, 1999 beginning at 7:00 a -m. to include furniture and appliances. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item No. 6.8. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote with MPT/O'Connor voting No on Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES: 6.1 .1 Joint Public Hearing of March 16, 1999 with D.B. Redevelopment Agency - as submitted. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of March 16, 1999 - as submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1999. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of February 23, 1999. 6.3 RECEIVED & FILED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.3.1 Sheriffs Department Presentation Workshop of January 14, 1999. 6.3.2 Regular Meeting of January 14, 1999. 6.3.3 Regular Meeting of February 11, 1999. 6.4 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 6, 1999 in the amount of $744,145.02. 6.5 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT - February, 1999. 6.6 APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 BUDGET AMENDMENT No. 2 (MPT/O'Connor voted No). 6.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 100 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY WEST OF PRESADO DRIVE AND 50 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY EAST OF PRESADO DRIVE. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL 6.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-18: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF "NO RIGHT -TURN ON RED, 7:30 A.M. - 8:00 A.M./2:15 P.M. - 2:45 P.M., SCHOOL DAYS ONLY: SIGNS AT ALL QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE". 6.10 AWARDED CONTRACT TO DEWAN LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES (DLA) FOR PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CABLE UPGRADE - in an amount not -to -exceed $5,000 for inspection services related to the Cable System Upgrade. All fees will be paid by Century Communications. 6.11 RESOLUTION NO. 99-19: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 1998-1999 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT - for a 1998-1999 Playground Cover and Surfacing Grant. 6.12 EXTENDED VENDOR SERVICES FOR PUBLICITY BANNERS - authorized additional work to be performed by Dekra-Lite for banners, banner support poles and banner installation/removal in an mount not -to -exceed $15,000 for FY 98/99. 6.13 AUTHORIZED ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR REMEDY - In the amount of $3,500 for temporary secretarial support assistance, making the total to Remedy in the amount of $14,520. 6.14 APPROVED AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR MINUTE SECRETARY SERVICES - authorized the City Manager to approve an additional expenditure of $500 with Carol A. Dennis, amending the total contract amount to $23,500. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.8 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 50 FEET OF DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING ON EACH RESPECTIVE LEG OF THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND HIGHCREST DRIVE, AND A STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTING LEG OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AT HIGHCREST DRIVE - Continued to April 20, 1999. 7_ PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. Through adoption of Resolution No. 96-41, the City established the current penalty which needs to be APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL amended in order to conform to the Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. M/Chang declared the Public Hearing open. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20, 1999. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. These amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. M/Chang opened the Public Hearing. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20,1999. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 PRESENTATION BY THE ROTH GROUP REGARDING THE COMMUNITYICIVIC CENTER TASK FORCE - Council established the Community/Civic Center Task Force to study the possibility of creating a focal point for the D.B. community. Marlene Roth, principal of The Roth Group, presented an update of the Task Force's activities. 8.2 AWARD OF CONTRACT TO COCA COLA FOR INSTALLATION OF VENDING MACHINES IN CITY PARKS - Council approved a policy to allow installation of vending machines in City parks to generate revenue. Staff released an RFP and received three responses. A committee of three staff members interviewed each of the proposers and recommended awarding a contract to Coca Cola Bottling Company. Features of the proposal include: 1) two state-of-the-art vandal resistant machines to be installed in each park at no cost to the City; 2) all stocking and maintenance costs to be borne by Coca Cola; 3) City will receive 35% commission on each $1 of sales, less sales tax and CRV, and 4) each park will have soda, non -carbonated drinks and water. MPT/O'Connor asked that a "lock -down" provision be included in the contract so that the machines are not available for use when various sports organizations are APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL selling items from concession stands. Following discussion, C/Ansari moved, C/Herrera seconded, to approve the agreement for twelve months (one year) with the addition of a termination clause, with the addition to a lock -down provision and with a maintenance turn -around time of 24 hours, with the exception of weekends. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from March 16, 1999. Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its Public Hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration - Continued to April 20, 1999. 8.5 AMENDMENT N0, 1 TO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES (PETER LEWANDOWSKI) REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE WOHL PROJECT AND THE LANTERMAN FORENSIC PROJECT - The existing contract amount is $5,560. An additional allocation of $14,000 is requested to permit additional environmental services as necessary. The total amount of the contract will increase to $19,560. MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Environmental Impact Sciences (Peter Lewandowski) in the amount of $14,000. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.6 EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL STANDARDS TASK FORCE - The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force was presented to Council on July 21, 1998. In August 1998, Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues and institutional impact. A presentation was made before Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five Task Force recommendations requiring additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50% diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selection of a single service provider for the single-family residence sector and stipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi -family residential housing. Don Gravdahl expressed concern regarding a proposed $4 green waste pickup charge and how the inclusion of commercial/multi-family accounts could help the City reach the State mandated requirements for recycling. Clyde Hennessee did not want to bear the burden for the cost of recycling. C/Ansari asked that staff explain how San Dimas has reduced its recycling by 64%. C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to continue this matter to April 20, 1999. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTI - HAZARD FUNCTION PLAN - The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. SB 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve the coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations which took effect in September, 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Plan will bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future. Continued to April 20, 1999. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL 9.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING PACIFIC BELLS' 411 RATE INCREASE - SBC/Pac Bell has applied to the California Public Utilities Commission for permission to increase the charge of a local directory assistance call from $.25 up to $1.10. This is a 340% increase. In addition, SBC/Pac Bell is asking to raise the rate of an emergency break -through call from $1.00 to $5.00. C/Huff moved, C/Ansari seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-20 with a clarification of the term "not any other dial around numbers" to the Council. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9.3 RECOMMENDATIONS BY CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE: (a) SUPPORT SB 597 (POOCHIGIAN) - Would require a city's consent prior to acquisition, through eminent domain, by a joint exercise of powers authority/agency, where the property proposed to be acquired is within the boundaries of the city. If said property is within the city's sphere of influence area, the county in which the property is located must consent to the condemnation. A city's participation as a party to the joint owners agreement to form the authority/agency shall not constitute the consent required by this section. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 99-21: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING POLICY GUIDELINES REGARDING RIVERS AND MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS - There are several State legislative proposals which would create a rivers and mountains conservation authority related to the San Gabriel River watershed area. The proposals are very different in scope and approach. In an effort to avoid, at least at this point, choosing between the legislation, the League of California Cities, L.A. Division. Legislative Committee, adopted policy guidelines to guide the League member cities regarding any rivers and mountains conservancy legislative proposal. (c) SB 1277 (HAYDEN) - Would prohibit construction of new roads and other infrastructure in or through units of the State Park system and land reserves that are either leased or held in fee simple title. Further, it would exclude infrastructure specifically identified in an approved General Plan for the park or reserve that is necessary for operation, maintenance, management or use of the park or reserve. However, construction can be approved by a legislative measure requiring approval of a two-thirds vote APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL of the membership of each house of the Legislature. C/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve (a), (b) and (c). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: M/Chang recessed the Meeting to the Redevelopment Agency at 11:50 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Council meeting at 11:50 p.m. M/Chang reconvened the City 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Huff stated that he had devoted most of the past three weeks to the Lanterman project. He hoped that the Council Member's actions clearly convey their commitment to this matter. He asked that during the Kosovo conflict, citizens please extend their hearts and prayers to the families of the captured soldiers and NATO forces that are in harms' way. C/Ansari said she had attended many meetings regarding the Lanterman project. She continues to work to obtain funding for transportation going out of California into Texas. She asked that the Larkstone Park matter be placed on the next City Council agenda. C/Herrera believed that all Council Members are united in our effort to oppose the Lanterman expansion project and are working diligently to successfully conclude this matter in such a way that officials in Sacramento will locate the forensic facility at a different location. MPT/O'Connor concurred with C/Herrera's comments. She requested that staff meet with the D.B. Amateur Radio Society members to review the applicable section of the newly adopted Telecommunications Ordinance. M/Chang reported that Council has been working very hard on behalf of the community to successfully resolve the Lanterman project matter as well as other important matters that affect the residents of D. B. He thanked the citizens for their concern and input. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 18 CITY COUNCIL 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk SAMPLE WATER AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, water is California's most. precious natural resource, and; WHEREAS, the drought years of 1987 — 1993 taught Californians the importance of conserving water for the health and welfare of the state, and; WHEREAS, residents, local government, and business have successfully decreased the use of water in California, and; WHEREAS, all Californians need to continue to conserve water and to use water wisely, and; WHEREAS, during the month of May, the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR joins with the Walnut Valley Water District and the California Water Awareness Campaign, composed of various urban and agricultural water agencies, cities, farm bureaus and other organizations, to work to increase understanding of water and to make water conservation a way of life. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR does hereby proclaim May 1999 as Water Awareness Month and urges all citizens to join in supporting local water organizations in their effort to help Californians "Use Water Wisely -It's a Way of Life." C:VAY Documentswisc Foiderm'99 MAY WATER AWARENESS MONTH4Proclamation'99.doc WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 271 South Brea Canyon Road -- Walnut, California 91789 Phone: (909) 595-1268 / FAX: (909) 444-5521 + �� Fax Transmission To: Marisa From: Alice Nahani City of Diamond Bar Fax #: (909) 861-3117 Date: 4-27-99 Time: Message: Re: Water Awareness Month Proclamation Thank you for advising that the City will place the Water Awareness Month Proclamation before the Council for adoption on May 4. Following is a sample Proclamation for your convenience. We will let you know as soon as possible if someone from our District can be present to accept the Proclamation at 6:30 p.m. on May 4. _ Again thank you. Alice Number of Pages, including cover letter: 2 _ Original to Follow: ❑ Yes Xr No If you do not receive all of the pages to this transmittal, please call us back as soon as possible. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPTED FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW- IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMbIEDIATELV DY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. C:WIy DocumentslFormslFAK Form_doc 1]61551 N25A-SN-AD-M i CCOUNTY OF LOS ArvQeLeS SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DATE April 29, 1999 OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE 1P FILE NO. . FROM: RICHARD J. MARTINEZ, CAPTAIN TO: TERRY BELANGER, CITY 1!t4NAG WALNUT REGIONAL STATION ` C CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, l SUBJECT: SELECTION OF DIAMOND BAR T M LIEUTENANT .—. I am pleased to announce the selection of the new city of Diamond Bar Team Lieutenant, Lt. Joseph Maxey. RJM:TP:tp MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 6, 1999 DRAFT' STUDY SESSION: 4:20 p.m. Room CC -2, SCAQMD a) Goals & Objectives b) Traffic Impact Solutions 1. CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 p.m. - Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the regular City Council meeting to order at 6:42 p.m. in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. CA/Jenkins reported that Council asked his office to fully investigate all avenues relative to the possibility of initiating litigation to oppose the expansion of the Lanterman facility. In addition, the City has engaged the services of another law firm to look into these issues as well, so that the City has the services of two separate law firms exploring all avenues relative to whether or not a sound basis exists to file a lawsuit to oppose the expansion project. Tomorrow, a lawyer will be traveling to Sacramento in order to inspect all of the State's files in connection with this expansion project. In addition, he has begun working closely to share information and theories with the City Attorney of Pomona. Pomona has directed its City Attorney to file litigation in this matter. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Kathleen Newe. INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Reverend Rex Wolins, Associate Pastor, Diamond Canyon Christian Church. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: CM/Belanger requested the following: a. Continue Item 7.1, Public Hearing on Parking Penalty Schedule, to April 20, 1999. b. Continue Item 8.3, Resolution Denying an Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map 51253, to April 20, 1999. C. Continue Item 9. 1, Standardized Emergency Management Systems (SEMS) Multi -hazard Plan to April 20, 1999. d. Move Item 8.4, Resolution opposing the Establishment of a Forensic Treatment Program at Lanterman Developmental Center for discussion prior to Public Comments. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL Council concurred with CM/Belanger's recommendations. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Introduction of new Team Lieutenant Brent Cannady, Walnut Sheriff Station - Continued indefinitely. 3.2 Proclaimed April 11-16, 1999 as Library Week. 3.3 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Earthquake Preparedness Month. 3.4 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 3.5 Presented City Tile to Robert Steelwagon, owner of the Shopping Center at Golden Springs Dr. and Lemon Ave. MATTERS TAKEN OUT OF ORDER: 8.4 LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER'S SERVICES FORENSIC EXPANSION PROJECT - A) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FORENSIC TREATMENT PROGRAM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORENSIC PATIENT SECURITY COMPOUND AT THE LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER - The State Department of Developmental Services has determined, and the State Legislature has approved the transfer of 75 forensic patients to the Lanterman Developmental Center. Phyllis Baca asked why, after a year and a half, is the Council suddenly opposing this project. She asked for a copy of the first letter received from Sacramento as well as other correspondence received by the City. She asked if Council was told to remain quiet about this matter. Martha Bruske said that Lanterman has experience in caring for clients and that the facility has not caused the area any harm in its 72 year history. She believed that this time should be used to discuss how all parties concerned could work together. She also believed that the facility's clients are better cared for in the hospital rather than in community homes. The State owns the property and could use the land for a prison or a facility in which to house sex offenders or the acutely mentally ill. Kim Chapman, 22713 Happy Hollow, said she lives in the neighborhood that is situated closest to Lanterman - 1100 feet from the proposed expansion. She indicated that she and her neighbors have firsthand knowledge of Lanterman APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL residents wandering aimlessly on the hill behind their homes and she cited several incidents that have occurred in her area. She urged the Council to hire an attorney to file a lawsuit on behalf of the residents of Happy Hollow Rd. against the State for improper notification of the project. Sue Sisk, 1087 Flintlock Rd., felt that Council and the State were grossly negligent in notifying the residents. She thanked Council for forming a Task Force to address the issue and she believed that there had been misrepresentation by Lanterman regarding the extent of the project. She felt that housing forensic patients is a type of "prison." She reported that more than 1250 residents signed petitions over the holiday weekend and she was in support of the proposed resolution opposing the Lanterman project. Michael Lin, real estate sales and property management, expressed concern about the safety of his friends and their families. He felt that the State failed to properly notify the residents of the project. He pointed out that other developers are required to give notice of proposed projects. He asked citizens to join him in standing up for their rights as taxpaying citizens to stop the project before it destroys the neighborhood community. Bob Watts, 23845 Strange Creek Dr., explained that his home is about 400 yards from the Lanterman Development Center's entrance. Between his home and Lanterman, is a retirement center and several families with children. He was concerned that it would take only one incident to cause harm to one of these residents. He thanked Council for helping to make the community safe and encouraged them to continue their course of action to get forensic patients located to a more rural area. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes asked for a definition of "forensic" as it applies to the Lanterman project. The community must do something to reduce the fear and anguish of the residents. Darla Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said that the City needs to address "behavioral health beds" as well as, "forensic" beds. Although these patients may not have committed crimes, they are still dangerous. Wally Lyman, 615 Firepit Dr., lives very close to the Lanterman facility. He and other residents in his area were notified about the Lanterman project only about 10 days ago, not by an official agency, but by a flyer placed on their doors. He felt the residents should have received proper notification. Contrary to what he had been told, he believed that the project will adversely affect property values in the area. Betty Johnson, 546 EI Encino Dr., said she has always felt comfortable and safe in D.B. She asked Council to do its best to ensure the community's continued safety. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL Clyde Hennessee pointed out that the Chino Men's Facility is only 15 miles from D.B. Citizens need to be prepared for the worst possible situation. He asked why the Lanterman guards are not armed. Jennifer Hoey, 1104 Clouds Rest Dr., does not want to have to tolerate acceptance of this situation. She wants a safe living atmosphere for her family and her neighbors. She asked Council to do what is right. Fred Encinas, 716 North Looking Glass Dr., thanked Council for appointing him to the Task Force. He spoke about Pomona's lawsuit to stop the project. He read an article from the April 6 issue of the Daily Bulletin which quoted Councilman Robles of Pomona. He also read from an April 4 Daily Bulletin article regarding the project. He asked Council and the citizens to continue the fight to stop the project. He believed that Lanterman officials are not telling the truth about the project and wanted Council to expose the truth and ask Lanterman officials to stop the violence against protestors of the project. Craig Parks, 222 Gunsmoke Dr., said that this project sounds like a "prison." He urged Council to do whatever they can to prevent this project from moving forward. C/Ansari agreed with Mrs. Bruske that Lanterman has been a good neighbor. However, when you hear that the project proposes that double 16' fences spaced 4' apart with four 28' high observation guard towers, double gated entry sally port with an access/ingress control building and a security staff of more than 30 personnel, it sounds like a prison to the community. She believed it is incumbent upon her to take a stand in opposition to the project because of the potential security risk to the community and the security of the current Lanterman clientele. She explained how the project was down- played to the community. Knowledge of the facts changes the tone of the Lanterman project. D.B. is no longer the rural area that it was 72 years ago when Lanterman was first established. She said she will fight to stop the project; however, there are only five Council Members and the citizens need to send letters and make telephone calls to the State's elected officials protesting the project. C/Herrera stated that on March 16, 1999, Council established a Task Force to meet with community members to discuss options regarding the Lanterman project. The last three weeks have been filled with a great deal of activity on the part of City staff and residents in opposing the project. The City has committed thousands of dollars toward that end and the five Council Members have been contacting individuals and officials in order to attempt to influence others to oppose the project. Last night, the Pomona City Council took a position to oppose the project and voted to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop the project. Pomona invited D.B. to join with them in the fight to stop the project. The City Attorney reported at the beginning of tonight's meeting that this Council had a closed session during which the Council directed the City Attorney to pursue APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL D.B.'s options regarding the City of Pomona in filing a lawsuit to stop the project. This morning, she, MPT/O'Connor and Paula Lantz, Pomona City Council Member, appeared before the L.A. Board of Supervisors and urged them to adopt a position of opposition to the Lanterman expansion project. The vote was four Yes. Walnut City Council will consider the matter at its meeting tomorrow night (April 7). This Council and this City is doing everything it can to form a strong coalition. She asked CA/Jenkins to talk about the State's powers of authority regarding its programs. CA/Jenkins explained that the State is the paramount governmental authority and can do what it chooses with its property. The State does not have to comply with local zoning laws and the State has undertaking the authority and responsibility for the care of those persons with developmental disabilities including those who have committed crimes. The State has passed laws and adopted statutes and policies that dictate what type of facilities those persons are to be placed in and what types of standards judges must be guided by in the placement of such individuals when they are determined not to be competent to stand trial. The State has established facilities for the placement of those persons until they are in a position where they are competent to stand trial for the crimes that they have committed. Generally speaking, cities, as creatures of the State and subsidiary bodies of the State, have very little authority to stand in the way when the State sets its mind to use its property for those purposes, particularly when those purposes are determined to be the advancement of a State policy. As earlier stated, his firm has been asked to look at all possible avenues of opposition. The State is obligated to comply with environmental laws and a great deal of study has been started relative to whether the State has indeed complied with environmental laws in the approval of this facility. Ultimately, it becomes more of a political issue than a legal issue as far as the City is concerned. It may be that there are people who own property in the vicinity who may have other issues and other considerations that are not shared by the City. Those property owners are in a position to do whatever is necessary to protect themselves. The City can only participate in this matter with respect to assuring that the State has fully complied with environmental laws and has otherwise complied with all other requirements with which it must comply in going forward with a project of this kind. The Council has contacted elected officials at the State level in order to apply pressure to see what can be done about changing the State's plans. However, it should not be forgotten that the law is clear that the State has plenary authority over cities. C/Huff believed the City was "snookered" about the project. The City relied upon the good will that it had developed with Lanterman over the years. When Lanterman speaks about forensic patients, it is on a very low-key level. As more information is received, the City becomes more concerned. By definition, this project is a "prison." He also expressed concern about the compromised good will of Lanterman and their recent tactics of confiscating video tapes. He stated that Council is committed to making this matter right. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL MPT/O'Connor said that each Council Member attends meetings on a daily basis which could be considered "secret" because they do not notify each and every resident. The Lanterman meetings were not secret meetings - they were attended by D.B., Pomona, Walnut, Cal -Poly, Sheriff Department, CHP and City of Pomona police department personnel. She read a letter she wrote on February 11, 1999 to Ruth Maples, Executive Director of Lanterman. She stated she attended the Lanterman meetings last year and she trusted what was said during the meetings. As time went on, she came to realize that the facts were not as originally presented. She recommended that language be added to the proposed Resolution that Council wishes to join forces with surrounding communities in fighting this matter and that the Resolution acknowledge that in the past Lanterman has been a good neighbor to the City of D.B. M/Chang spoke about the efforts of Council and staff to oppose this project. C/Huff expressed concern about adding language to the Resolution regarding Lanterman's previous record because the City cannot corroborate this information. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-16 opposing the establishment of a forensic treatment program and the construction of a forensic patient security compound at the Lanterman Developmental Center, with the following amendment: Following the sixth WHEREAS, insert and, "WHEREAS, the State of California failed to provide effective notice to the Diamond Bar community which is especially inexplicable in light of the failure to provide notice to surrounding communities related to other recent projects i.e.: Metropolitan Hospital in Norwalk and, "WHEREAS: the City of Diamond Bar will work in concert, with its neighboring cities (Pomona, Walnut and Industry), the County of Los Angeles, Cal Poly -Pomona, State elected officials, Congressional elected officials, other public agencies/institutions and community individuals and organizations, to oppose the Lanterman forensic expansion project." Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None B) MATTER OF LANTERMAN AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT TASK FORCE MISSION STATEMENT - On March 30, 1999, the Task Force approved a Mission Statement related to the proposed Lanterman Forensic Project. David Bell expressed concern that the Task Force members who work for Lanterman are not working cohesively with the City's Task Force members. He asked that, in good faith, Council should remove the two Lanterman employees APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL from the Task Force and appoint new members who are committed to stopping the project. Sue Sisk clarified the Mission Statement Task Force discussions. She believed that this is a working document only. C/Huff asked if it would be acceptable to the Task Force if the Council accepted the Mission Statement in the spirit with which it was made i.e.. to give direction to the Task Force. Could this be received and filed without the Council's approval? Some things are problematic to approve such as "insure re -opening of the EIR " The City has hired an attorney to analyze it legislators mounted a written campaign to re -open the EIR and the State said no. Other avenues to accomplish this are still being explored It may be a better way to phrase it that "we can try our hardest." Also "obtain injunction"—we may or may not be able to do that We understand the spirit of the Statement. Ms Sisk agreed that receipt and file of the Task Force Mission Statement by Council would be acceptable. Martha Bruske pointed out that Task Force members who work for Lanterman are D.B. residents. Joseph Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said he is a member of the Task Force and strongly believed that the Lanterman employees who are Task force members do not strongly support the views of the group and do not have the best interest of D.B. in mind. He outlined reasons why he is opposed to referring to Lanterman as a "good neighbor." Wally Lyman also believed that Lanterman employees should be asked to resign from the Task Force. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes stated that the Task Force cannot prevent Lanterman employees from being present during meetings. Bob Watts recommended that the City change the name of the Task Force to a name reflecting its opposition to the Lanterman project. Fred Encinas asked Council to publicize its opposition actions, reimburse the Task Force for its expenses and to more visibly and vocally show their outrage at this project. In response to C/Ansari, Mr. Encinas indicated that he would like the Council to request that Lanterman return the confiscated video tape to its rightful owner and to stop escalating violence against petitioners. Kim Chapman asked for a response to her question regarding whether the City APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL will provide funding for legal services to represent the Happy Hollow residents. CM/Belanger stated that staff will contact Mrs. Chapman tomorrow morning regarding this matter. Linda Farrell spoke about the confrontation with Lanterman staff and clients while she was petitioning residents in front of Von's Market. M/Chang reminded the audience to focus on the agenda item. Joe Ruzicka stated that there about 900 children in the D.B. Little League bordering the railroad tracks and Sunset Crossing which is in close proximity to the proposed project and the district board is very concerned about their safety. The Little League does not have funding to provide protective measures from potential Lanterman escapees. MPT/O'Connor reminded the audience why the Task Force was established. She felt that Lanterman employees might be able to give the Task Force information it did not already have. She stated she will ask her Lanterman employee Task Force member to resign. However, Task Force meetings are public meetings and Lanterman employees may attend the meetings. C/Huff proposed adoption of the Mission Statement. He stated that the Task Force job is finished and he proposed formation of a committee to oppose the Lanterman Forensic Expansion with five members appointed by each Council Member. He read a suggested Mission Statement for the new committee: "The Mission of the Committee Against Lanterman Forensic Expansion appointed by the D.B. City Council, is to establish and bring to bear a powerful and unified voice of elected officials and community members to ensure the safety and welfare of the community, protect property values and preserve the socio- economic environment through the abolition of the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Expansion Project Secure Treatment Facility." CA/Jenkins stated that the dissolution of the Task Force and formation of a committee is not on the agenda and should be scheduled for the next Council meeting. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to accept the Mission Statement. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None MPT/O'Connor indicated that she had had many questions concerning the make up and activities of the Task Force. Further, she had some real legal issues with APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL some of the things that the Task Force was doing. Before we form a new committee, we need to establish what the legal requirements are for the Task Force members. She stated that she was not ready for form a new Task Force until Council can define the Task Force's legal issues and whether they are on personal business or Task Force business. C/Huff moved, C/Herrera seconded, to consider the matter of the status of the Task Force an urgency matter to place upon the agenda discussion of the possibility of disbanding of the Task Force. Motion failed by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera Huff. MPT/O'Connor NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari M/Chan ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Martha Bruske reiterated that the Council failed to adequately notify the residents regarding the Lanterman project. Thom Pruitt stated that the Lanterman Expansion Project would potentially have an adverse effect on the D.B. Pop Warner Football and Cheerleader program in that some of the group's activities are held in the vicinity of the YMCA which is adjacent to the Lanterman facility. He announced that the Pop Warner Football organization will hold its annual Celebrity Invitation Golf Tournament on Monday, May 3 at the Via Verde Country Club. Carolyn Elfelt and Janet Roberts invited the Council and residents to participate in the DBHS stadium expansion festivities to be held on Friday and Saturday, April 16 and 17. Allen Wilson stated that the Friends of the Library Wine Tasting Soiree will be held on April 25 to raise funds for books and other community related library projects. Aaron Flisik reminded the Council that there is a need for a skateboard park in D.B. In response to Clyde Hennessee, MPT/O'Connor explained that the Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6 budget adjustment is the total amendment amount for the change in General Fund expenditures. Carol Willner, Lorbeer Middle School Principal, spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No. 6.9. She suggested that the afternoon time be changed to 2:15 to 2:45 p.m. Joseph Farrell asked for an explanation of the vote to place an item on the agency as an urgency item. Jeff Koontz, D.B. Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Grand Opening for the Hand Car Wash will be held on Saturday, April 17 adjacent to the Country Hills Towne Center. He spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6. He recommended that a neon sign be added for "No Right Turn" purposes that would be monitored by the crossing APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL guard. Fred Encinas reiterated the need for press releases on Council Member's activities regarding Lanterman. He recommended that the Walnut Sheriffs Station be alerted to potential conflicts between residents and Lanterman employees. Sue Sisk asked for an explanation of legal issues regarding the Task Force. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 8, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - Tuesday, April 13, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 CITY 10th BIRTHDAY PARTY CELEBRATION - Sunday, April 18, 1999 - 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m., Peterson Park, 24142 E. Sylvan Glen Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, April 20, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 22, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.6 CURBSIDE BULKY ITEM COLLECTION - Saturday, April 24, 1999 beginning at 7:00 a.m. to include furniture and appliances. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item No. 6.8. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote with MPT/O'Connor voting No on Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES 6.1.1 Joint Public Hearing of March 16, 1999 with D.B. Redevelopment Agency - as submitted. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of March 16, 1999 - as submitted. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL 6.2 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1999. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of February 23, 1999. 6.3 RECEIVED & FILED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.3.1 Sheriffs Department Presentation Workshop of January 14, 1999. 6.3.2 Regular Meeting of January 14, 1999. 6.3.3 Regular Meeting of February 11, 1999. 6.4 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 6, 1999 in the amount of $744,145.02. 6.5 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT - February, 1999. 6.6 APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 BUDGET AMENDMENT No. 2 (MPT/O'Connor voted No). 6.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 100 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY WEST OF PRESADO DRIVE AND 50 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY EAST OF PRESADO DRIVE. 6.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-18: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF "NO RIGHT -TURN ON RED, 7:30 A.M. - 8:00 A.M./2:15 P.M. - 2:45 P.M., SCHOOL DAYS ONLY: SIGNS AT ALL QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE". 6.10 AWARDED CONTRACT TO DEWAN LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES (DLA) FOR PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CABLE UPGRADE - in an amount not -to -exceed $5,000 for inspection services related to the Cable System Upgrade. All fees will be paid by Century Communications. 6.11 RESOLUTION NO. 99-19: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 1998-1999 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT - for a 1998-1999 Playground Cover and Surfacing Grant. 6.12 EXTENDED VENDOR SERVICES FOR PUBLICITY BANNERS - authorized additional work to be performed by Dekra-Lite for banners, banner support poles and banner installation/removal in an mount not -to -exceed $15,000 for FY 98/99. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL 6.13 AUTHORIZED ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR REMEDY - In the amount of $3,500 for temporary secretarial support assistance, making the total to Remedy in the amount of $14,520. 6.14 APPROVED AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR MINUTE SECRETARY SERVICES - authorized the City Manager to approve an additional expenditure of $500 with Carol A. Dennis, amending the total contract amount to $23,500. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.8 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 50 FEET OF DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING ON EACH RESPECTIVE LEG OF THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND HIGHCREST DRIVE, AND A STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTING LEG OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AT HIGHCREST DRIVE - Continued to April 20, 1999. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. Through adoption of Resolution No. 96-41, the City established the current penalty which needs to be amended in order to conform to the Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. M/Chang declared the Public Hearing open. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20, 1999. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. These amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. M/Chang opened the Public Hearing. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20,1999. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 PRESENTATION BY THE ROTH GROUP REGARDING THE COMMUNITY/CIVIC CENTER TASK FORCE - Council established the Community/Civic Center Task Force to study the possibility of creating a focal point for the D.B. community. Marlene Roth, principal of The Roth Group, presented an update of the Task Force's activities. 8.2 AWARD OF CONTRACT TO COCA COLA FOR INSTALLATION OF VENDING MACHINES IN CITY PARKS - Council approved a policy to allow installation of vending machines in City parks to generate revenue. Staff released an RFP and received three responses. A committee of three staff members interviewed each of the proposers and recommended awarding a contract to Coca Cola Bottling Company. Features of the proposal include: 1) two state-of-the-art vandal resistant machines to be installed in each park at no cost to the City; 2) all stocking and maintenance costs to be borne by Coca Cola; 3) City will receive 35% commission on each $1 of sales, less sales tax and CRV, and 4) each park will have soda, non -carbonated drinks and water. MPT/O'Connor asked that a "lock -down" provision be included in the contract so that the machines are not available for use when various sports organizations are selling items from concession stands. Following discussion, C/Ansari moved, C/Herrera seconded, to approve the agreement for twelve months (one year) with the addition of a termination clause, with the addition to a lock -down provision and with a maintenance turn -around time of 24 hours, with the exception of weekends. Motion carried by the following. Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPTIO'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from March 16, 1999. Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its Public Hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration - Continued to April 20, 1999. 8.5 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES (PETER LEWANDOWSKI) REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE WOHL PROJECT AND THE LANTERMAN FORENSIC PROJECT - The existing contract amount is $5,560. An additional allocation of $14,000 is requested to permit additional environmental services as necessary. The total amount of the contract will increase to $19,560. MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Environmental Impact Sciences (Peter Lewandowski) in the amount of $14,000. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.6 EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE - The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force was presented to Council on July 21, 1998. In August 1998, Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues and institutional impact. A presentation was made before Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five Task Force recommendations requiring additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50% diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selection of a single service provider for the single-family residence sector and S-tipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi -family residential housing. Don Gravdahl expressed concern regarding a proposed $4 green waste pickup charge and how the inclusion of commercial/multi-family accounts could help the City reach the State mandated requirements for recycling. Clyde Hennessee did not want to bear the burden for the cost of recycling. C/Ansari asked that staff explain how San Dimas has reduced its recycling by APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL 64%. C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to continue this matter to April 20, 1999. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTI - HAZARD FUNCTION PLAN - The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. SB 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve the coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations which took effect in September, 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Plan will bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future. Continued to April 20, 1999. 9.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING PACIFIC BELLS' 411 RATE INCREASE - SBC/Pac Bell has applied to the California Public Utilities Commission for permission to increase the charge of a local directory assistance call from $.25 up to $1.10. This is a 340% increase. In addition, SBC/Pac Bell is asking to raise the rate of an emergency break -through call from $1.00 to $5.00. C/Huff moved, C/Ansari seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-20 with a clarification of the term "not any other dial around numbers" to the Council. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9.3 RECOMMENDATIONS BY CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE: (a) SUPPORT SB 597 (POOCHIGIAN) - Would require a city's consent prior to acquisition, through eminent domain, by a joint exercise of powers APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL authority/agency, where the property proposed to be acquired is within the boundaries of the city. If said property is within the city's sphere of influence area, the county in which the property is located must consent to the condemnation. A city's participation as a party to the joint owners agreement to form the authority/agency shall not constitute the consent required by this section. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 99-21: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING POLICY GUIDELINES REGARDING RIVERS AND MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS - There are several State legislative proposals which would create a rivers and mountains conservation authority related to the San Gabriel River watershed area. The proposals are very different in scope and approach. In an effort to avoid, at least at this point, choosing between the legislation, the League of California Cities, L.A. Division. (c) Legislative Committee, adopted policy guidelines to guide the League member cities regarding any rivers and mountains conservancy legislative proposal. (d) SB 1277 (HAYDEN) - Would prohibit construction of new roads and other infrastructure in or through units of the State Park system and land reserves that are either leased or held in fee simple title. Further, it would exclude infrastructure specifically identified in an approved General Plan for the park or reserve that is necessary for operation, maintenance, management or use of the park or reserve. However, construction can be approved by a legislative measure requiring approval of a two-thirds vote of the membership of each house of the Legislature. C/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve (a), (b) and (c). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: M/Chang recessed the Meeting to the Redevelopment Agency at 11:50 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Council meeting at 11:50 p.m. M/Chang reconvened the City 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Huff stated that he had devoted most of the past three weeks to the Lanterman project. He hoped that the Council Member's actions clearly convey their commitment APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL to this matter. He asked that during the Kosovo conflict, citizens please extend their hearts and prayers to the families of the captured soldiers and NATO forces that are in harms' way. C/Ansari said she had attended many meetings regarding the Lanterman project. She continues to work to obtain funding for transportation going out of California into Texas. She asked that the Larkstone Park matter be placed on the next City Council agenda. C/Herrera believed that all Council Members are united in our effort to oppose the Lanterman expansion project and are working diligently to successfully conclude this matter in such a way that officials in Sacramento will locate the forensic facility at a different location. MPT/O'Connor concurred with C/Herrera's comments. She requested that staff meet with the D.B. Amateur Radio Society members to review the applicable section of the newly adopted Telecommunications Ordinance. M/Chang reported that Council has been working very hard on behalf of the community to successfully resolve the Lanterman project matter as well as other important matters that affect the residents of D.B. He thanked the citizens for their concern and input. 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL O REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 20, 1999 A p CLOSED SESSION: .m., 5:00 SCAQMD Room CC -8 Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the City Council meeting to order at 6:43 p.m. in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. CA/Jenkins reported that during Closed Session, Council directed the City Attorney to work with special legal counsel to file a lawsuit against the State of California objecting to the expansion of the Lanterman facility. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Mike Jenkins, City Attorney; James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director, and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Tom Ortiz INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Pastor Larry Grigsby, Calvary Chapel. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: CM/Belanger requested that Agenda Item 7.1 (a) and (b) be continued to May 4, 1999. C/Huff asked that Council Comments and Subcommittee reports be brought back to the front part of the agenda after Special Presentations, Certificates, Proclamations and prior to Public Comments. M/Chang recommended that the Council Comments and Subcommittee reports be placed on the agenda following Public Comments. Council concurred to place the Council Subcommittee reports on the Agenda following Public Comments. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Presented Certificates of Recognition to D.B.H.S. Students for receiving perfect SAT scores. 3.2 Presented City Tile to Lt. Dave Stothers upon his retirement from the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL 3.3 Proclaimed April 30, 1999 as "Dia de los Ninos; Celebrating Young Americans." 3.4 Proclaimed April 25 through May 1, 1999 as "Safety Seat Checkup Week." 3.5 Presentation by Foothill Transit regarding its 10th anniversary of service. 3.6 Informational update regarding City Council efforts to oppose the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Expansion Project. M/Chang stated that there is nothinq more important in the City than the Kim at Lanterman and suagested that emplovees of Lanterman refrain from harassing demonstrators and that everyone should treat one another with Cal Poly and asked them to send a representative to attend the public hearing to be held by Assemblyman Pacheco at Walnut City Hall and asked Cal Poly President Suzuki to send written opposition to the project Further Congressman Gary Miller to thank him for writing the letter against the proiect. along with Congressman David Dreier. Congressman Miller indicated that he would put pressure on the State and if necessary, $14 million of Federal funding could be cut if this project is still ongoing He also indicated that he had spoken to the Chinese newspaper to provide information about the proiect explain the City's opposition to it and express possibility of legal action against the project The decision was made to do so. All Council Members signed a letter to the Governor opposing the prosect. Both MPT/O'Connor and M/Chang spoke with PUS D Superintendent Patrick Leier and two Board Members to encourage them to adopt a resolution of opposition He thanked Sen Mountjoy for his continuing support in opposing the Proiect and had staff contact Joe Baca President Pro Tem of the Senate to ask for his support MPT/O'Connor stated that she had been taking phone calls daily, both at n.i_ - I a— _ _ . . . . -- - - Chamber of Commerce Legislative Breakfast meeting and brought them up to date. She attended the Walnut Town Forum and spoke about some of the discrepancies that she had heard as a member of the Advisory Committee APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL with Lanterman. On April 10, she attended an Economic Summit held at Cal Poly and spoke with a representative from the Lt Governor's Office and asked the representative what the economic benefit would be to the City, Cal Poly Pomona and the surrounding areas to have the Lanterman "Prison" in 7:30 p.m. at PUSD to discuss the project and encouraged residents to attend to lend their support to the resolution that will be presented She too attend the Pomona Chamber of Commerce Power Lunch attended by Congressmen Miller and Dreier. Sen Mountiov. Sen Baca Assemblymen Pacheco Margett and Soto and thanked all of them for their letters of support in opposition to Lanterman She also encouraged them to keep this on the front bumer, because there is $1.7 million for the 1999-2000 budget for were brought up to date on what the City has been doing on the political expressing that the City is anxiously awaiting their response to the citizens' questions and the possibility of transferring different types of clients to a letter to Mr. Schleope concerning the public notification and the subscription for the Dailv Bulletin S G Tribune L A Times and the O.C. Register and how many subscribers there are in D B Determining whether that was an adequate public notice She attended the D B Chamber of Commerce Board Meetina this morning and attempted to bring them up to date as to what is happening with Lanterman C/Huff indicated that he had attended the April 8th the Town Hall meetina and spoke with all Council Members in attendance from the surrounding he had a lengthy conversation with a Council Member from Norwalk who had a similar situation in their community, and she suggested that the City work uvith Qtimtn a --'L-- I--- .-- . — . . . . - regarding the project and attended the rally after. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL C/Herrera stated that on approximately April 13`h she sent a letter to the WVUSD asking the school board to take a position of opposition She received a phone call from one of their Board Members asking what she could do to help. Most of the Council Members were at the meetings Previously addressed. She indicated that she would be going to Sacramento the next day to participate in a function with Sen Richard Polanco Assemblywoman Denise Ducheny, Sen. Richard Alarcon Sen Joe Baca and Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa These are "key" people within the State Legislature, who will receive letters asking them to ioin with the cities of D.B.. Pomona. and Walnut to oppose the Lanterman Expansion Proiect We are paining support everyday, editorials in favor of stopping the expansion. The public pressure needs to continue Lee Baca asking him to come on board with the City, he guaranteed he she met with the SCAG General Assembly, where she spoke local politicians about the situation with Lanterman and urged them to speak with their asked Assemblyman Lowenthal in Lona Beach (Legislative Chair of Contract Cities) for his support. Further, she was a quest panelist on the Bill Rosendahl Show and spoke against the project at that time She wrote letters to Assemblywoman Martha Escutia Assemblywoman Dion Aroner, Chair of the of the Health Committee and to Assemblvman Villaraigosa CM/Belanger stated that on April 8th,the Task Force asked Lanterman whether forensic patients had already been housed at their facility and the response was "no." If Lanterman had answered "yes," they would have been in violation of the law since they don't have the proper security facilities. Staff will endeavor to find another way to discover whether there are currently forensic patients or if there have been recently forensic patients at the Lanterman facility. A report will be given on this matter at the next Task Force meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jaime Pardo said that the D.B. exit sign on the eastbound SR 60 is not visible during the evening hours and asked if the sign could be illuminated. He also requested that the D.B. Blvd. exits be labeled North D.B. Blvd. and South D.B. Blvd. respectively. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL Clyde Hennessee commended the D.B. residents for rallying to the efforts of opposing the Lanterman expansion project. He further commended Council and staff for their efforts to oppose the project. He asked Council to remember that competition among vendors is good for the City. Martha Bruske asked why the Lanterman issue is not an agenda item this evening so that the matter can be publicly discussed. She asked if Council has a contingency plan in the event that the Lanterman project moves forward and what plans the Council has for healing the community. She expressed concern that it is important for Council and the public to hold discussions regarding this matter. Sue Sisk, Chairperson, Lanterman Task Force, said that the previous evening's task force meeting was interrupted because the members were not previously informed about certain rules and guidelines that it must follow. She asked Council to contact her to discuss this matter further. She wanted the public to know that the task force is working on their behalf. She outlined the group's efforts and thanked Council for their support. David Bell asked Council and City Attorney to support the Mt. SAC Board's proposed Resolution calling for an investigation into Lanterman's history. He also asked Council to stop the politics and assist with funding for the lawsuit being proposed by the residents who live on Happy Hollow Road. Tom Ortiz said that if he had met with Lanterman officials over a year ago he would have asked them more questions about the types of patients that were anticipated to be included in the expansion. Kim Chapman said she is very upset about the Lanterman expansion project. She suggested that the Little League adopt a Resolution opposing the project. Al Rumpilla said that the State of California lied to the Council and City Manager about what kind of patients would be accommodated by the Lanterman expansion project. However, it does not excuse Council from informing the public. Bob Watts, 23845 Strange Creek Dr., asked what the City's focus will be when it files a lawsuit against the State of California. CM/Belanger stated staff will contact CalTrans tomorrow to obtain an answer for Mr. Pardo. The Task Force has asked staff to determine whether Forensic patients will be housed at the Lanterman facility when the expansion is completed. He indicated that this question was asked of Lanterman officials at the April 8 meeting and they responded that there will be no forensic patients housed in the Lanterman facility. Staff will endeavor to find another way to discover whether there are currently forensic patients or whether forensic patients have recently been housed at the facility and to prepare a report for the Task Force committee's next meeting. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL CA/Jenkins stated that the City cannot engage in "grass roots" lobbying and that it is improper for City funds to be expended in attempting to persuade people to persuade their State and Federal officials on a particular course of action. The City has attempted to draw some distinction between disseminating information, conducting meetings, making recommendations on one hand, which is an appropriate course of conduct for a City Task Force and other types of activities such as petition gathering, or engaging in protests, or engaging in other sorts of "grass roots" lobbying behavior which is more appropriate for a private group of citizens and not a City Task Force. There has been some notion that the use of the word "prison" was inflammatory and inaccurate and not appropriate for the City's Task Force to employ. There has been no discussion limiting the use of that terminology on the part of private citizens or groups of citizens. There is no problem with the use of "stop" in printed materials. According to the law, the Lanterman expansion facility is not a "prison." The goal of the City is to avoid grass roots lobbying and to avoid the use of incorrect terminology on official City documents which the City is responsible for preparing at City expense. A prison is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Corrections. The Lanterman facility is not technically a prison within the State of California. 5. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS: C/Ansari stated she attended the following: Library Week; the Chamber of Commerce Installation Dinner; the Water Quality Committee meeting during which the new Water Bond issue was discussed; the Inland Valley Micro Enterprise Committee meeting; a Legislative Board meeting for Contract Cities during which Solid Waste Bill AB939 was discussed, and an Alternate Dispute Resolution meeting. C/Herrera reported her participation in the following subcommittee meetings: Finance Committee; Legislative Subcommittee; Tres Hermanos Conservation Authority (Joint Powers Authority) during which discussions regarding the use of land between D.B. and Chino Hills was discussed; and the Lanterman Expansion Project Subcommittee meeting. C/Huff reported on the following meetings: Walnut School District meeting as liaison; Alameda Corridor East Construction special board meeting as Chairman; Community Center/Civic Center Task Force Meeting as Chairman; Council of Governments (COG) meeting; the City's Birthday Party; and the Tres Hermanos Conservation Authority as Chairman. MPT/O'Connor reported on the following meetings: Chamber of Commerce Legislative breakfast meeting; Chamber of Commerce Installation; Community Center/Civic Center Task Force meeting; Pomona Unified School District Subcommittee meeting; 10th City Anniversary Celebration Subcommittee as City Council liaison. She commended everyone who participated in the success of the Celebration and asked that they be recognized at the next Council meeting. Further, she attended the Lanterman Task Force Subcommittee meeting; Chamber of Commerce Board meeting as the City's liaison; and YMCA Golf Tournament APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL committee meeting. She serves as delegate to the Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority (WCCA). The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 5. WCCA has received notice that D.B. can appoint two representatives to WCCA's Advisory Committee. She encouraged citizens who are concerned about environmental issues and who might wish to participate on the committee to request an application form from the City. M/Chang reported on his attendance at the Pomona Unified School District meeting, the Economic Development Subcommittee meeting and participation in many City functions. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - April 22, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 CITYWIDE CURBSIDE BULKY ITEM COLLECTION -April 24,1999-7:00 a.m. 5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - April 27, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, May 4, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item Nos. 6.1.1, 6.5, 6.11 and 6.13. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote with MPT/O'Connor voting No on Check Nos. 35342 through 35347 on the Warrant Register because the entire Council had not vet had an opportunity to provide their input on the Community Support Fund. MPT/O'Connor also abstained from voting on approval of the Study Session Minutes of April 6, 1999. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES: 6.1.1 Study Session of April 6, 1999 - as submitted. 6.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 20, 1999 in the amount of $1,068,400.38. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL 6.3 REJECTED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Kathryn McGrath on April 5, 1999 and referred the matter for further action to the City's Risk Manager. 6.4 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-22: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AT HIGHCREST DRIVE. 6.6 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-23: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 1998-1999 CDBG HANDICAP RAMPS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. 6.7 AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES OF CONVERSE CONSULTANTS FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - from existing developer accounts to continue the pre -October 6, 1998 assignments for soils and geotechnical engineering services of Converse Consultants in an amount not -to -exceed $51,489 through FY 99-2000. 6.8 AUTHORIZED CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF DEWAN LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - from developer fees for continuance of the pre - October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by Dewan, Lundin & Associates. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through FY 99-2000 is not -to - exceed $25,500. 6.9 AUTHORIZED CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - from developer fees for the continuance of the pre - October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by GFB-Friedrich & Associates, Inc. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through FY 99-2000 is not -to -exceed $37,600. 6.10 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-24: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE SURPLUS OF THREE CITY VEHICLES WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL SECTION 3.24.200 - authorized the City Manager to surplus the vehicles as listed in Exhibit "A" of the Resolution. 6.12 AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO PURCHASE A VEHICLE - in an amount not -to -exceed $20,000 from AB 3229 (COPS Program) funding. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999. C/Huff requested several corrections - continued to May 4, 1999. 6.5 RESOLUTION NO. 99-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MEADOWGLEN ROAD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. Following discussion, C/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-23 approving plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Rd. public street improvement project. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.11 APPROVED EXTENSION OF VENDOR PRINTING SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER AND RECREATION GUIDE. Following discussion, C/Ansari moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to authorize additional work to be performed by Bradshaw Brothers Printing in the amount of $6,085 so that they can proceed with printing the summer'99 issue of the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide. The total amount awarded shall not exceed $15,000 for FY 98-99. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.13 APPROVED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND THE DOLEZAL COMPANY AND THE DOLEZAL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL C/Ansari expressed extreme frustration about receiving a copy of "The Country Estates"' settlement agreement at the last hour. MPT/O'Connor asked CA/Jenkins to verify that the proposed settlement agreement contains terms set forth by Council. She would have preferred to have the settlement agreement in advance of tonight's meeting. CA/Jenkins responded that the agreement reached between Dolezal and "The Country Estates" provides, among other things, for those items that were felt to be important by Council. The settlement provides that this item will now come back to the City for full Public Hearings before the Planning Commission and Council. Following discussion, M/Chang moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to authorize the Mayor and the City Attorney to execute the Agreement. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 99-41C: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. Through adoption of Resolution No. 96-41, the City established the current penalty which needs to be amended in order to conform to the Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. Continued from April 6, 1999. M/Chang re -opened the Public Hearing. In response to Clyde Hennessee, CM/Belanger explained that the fines will not be increased. There being no further testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to May 4, 1999. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC — APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. These amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. M/Chang re -opened the Public Hearing. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to May 4,1999. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51243, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from April 6, 1999. Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. CA/Jenkins explained the considerations available to Council based upon a letter presented to the City by Mr. Patel's attorney. He did not agree with the opinion that the map is valid absent an extension of time approved by Council. Jan Dabney, representing Mr. Patel, explained Mr. Patel's current position and requested that the matter be continued to May 4, 1999. Mr. Dabney responded to C/Huff that Mr. Patel would withdraw the 17 lot subdivision and take his chances with litigation in trying to compel the Council with a writ of mandate for an act of God. Clyde Hennessee believed Council had been very accommodating to the applicant and he would like to see the issue resolved in two weeks. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL Following discussion, M/Chang moved, C/Ansari seconded, to continue the matter to May 4, 1999. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.2 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTIHAZARD FUNCTIONAL PLAN - Continued from April 6, 1999. The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. SB 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve the coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations which took effect in September 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Plan will bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future - report presented by Phil Armentrout, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator. C/Herrera requested that a Town Hall meeting be held to familiarize Council, staff and the public with the updated plan. MPT/O'Connor asked for consideration of the following comments and questions concerning the SEMS document: 1. Page: Part One - 56, Transportation Accidents. The detail under this line item is for San Dimas, not D.B. 2. Page: M-81. Why should the "Council Members refrain from direct involvement with City or Joint City/County/State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) activities"? 3. Do we have the "Vests" referred to in the Checklists that identify your title in the EOC? 4. Do we have 48 hours worth of food for City Staff? If so, where is it stored? 5. Page: 0-34. First sentence has a typo. "meed" should be "meet." 6. Page: P-18. Do we need to add the Inland Valley Humane Society? 7. The Organization Charts refer to a "City Council Advisory Committee." What is this about? 8. Page: L-7. Says the Assistant to the City Manager will fill the position of Logistics; Section Coordinator and Community Services Director APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL will be the Alternate. However, on Page L-9, it lists the positions in reverse order. Which is correct? 9. Page: L-30. Need a space between man/personnel (second to last line). 10. Acronyms: Should we add DBARS since it is referred to in the document? 11. Do we have a list of planned shelters and occupancy of those shelters? 12. Page: F-8. Refers to "Accounting Manager." Should that be changed to "Finance Director'? 13. Disaster Pay - Page 2. Do we have a policy to enable the City to pay overtime during a declared disaster which could then be eligible for reimbursement by the State and Federal Government? If not, should we create one? Mr. Armentrout replied that the typographical errors that MPT/O'Connor pointed out to him in her memorandum dated April 19, 1999 would be corrected accordingly. With respect to question 3, currently, there are no vests on hand; however, he will ask that an amount be included in next year's budget to provide for vests for management, the EOC director and others so that personnel are easily identifiable in the event of a disaster. The current budget includes an amount for supplies. Currently, SEMS is in the process of obtaining three bids for City staff to have three days worth of supplies on hand. He stated that, with respect to Council's role, it is very important that Council Members provide policy direction during a disaster. State law provides that the City Manager is the EOC Director/Incident Manager. It is important for Council to know when to declare a disaster, know the proper method of declaring or ratifying a disaster, and what support Council can conclude is a legislative liaison role if support from State or Federal agencies is required, or what the Council's role is with respect to public information. MPT/O'Connor commended Mr. Armentrout and his partner on their preparation of the document. MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve the SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan, as corrected, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Letter of Promulgation on behalf of the City. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL 8.3 EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE -Continued from April 6, 1999. The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force was presented to Council on July 21, 1998. In August, 1998, Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues and institutional impact. A presentation was made before Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five Task Force recommendations additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50% diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selection of a single service provider for the single-family residence sector and stipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi -family residential housing. - J. Michael Huls presented the report. C/Ansari left the meeting at 10:20 p.m. Mr. Hennessee said he kept hearing the words "single hauler" and believed that the City must have competition in order to insure quality and reasonable pricing. He does not need three bins and he does not want to have to pay for something he is not using. Jaime Pardo does not want three barrels and more than one truck coming down the street in one week. He would prefers a two barrel system. Why residents would be charged for recycling when they are doing their part to contribute to the 50% diversion. Who will provide the "roll out" service for seniors. He recommended that Council continue this matter and request more public input. Dave Pesh, District Manager, Waste Management, thanked Mr. Huls for his excellent presentation and offered his services to the City. Following discussion, MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Herrera seconded, to proceed with the "middle pack" (three barrel) system that results in the implementation of the recommended one barrel, two barrel and three barrel system including mandatory commercial and multi -family residential programs in an open environment; and direct staff to report on the numbers incorporating the key findings of the proposed systems and include the numbers for breaking out the voluntary green waste program. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS -Ansari APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL 8.4 APPROVAL OF THE 1999-2000 CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - Council has developed their 99-2000 Goals and Objectives, which have been divided into two categories; immediate time sensitive and regular goals and objectives. They have been ranked by the Council and have 19 general categories. There are 58 goals and objectives for the 99-2000 FY. Fred Encinas asked Council to expand the definition of what other citizens the Council assigns as a task force are expected to do and what assistance the Council will and will not provide. Further, he requested that Council provide as much information as possible so that the citizens and Council can work together to obtain the same goal. He read from a San Gabriel Valley Tribune editorial dated Wednesday, April 14 which supported the citizens' position in opposition of the Lanterman Expansion Project. He asked the Council to stand up for what is right and support the residents. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to approve the 99-2000 City Council Goals and Objectives with the following inclusion: "do everything possible to prohibit Lanterman Forensic and Behavioral Expansion Project" ranked No. 1. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari 8.5 APPOINTMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AND CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSN. - Due to resignation of MPT/O'Connor as Alternate to SCAG and Delegate to Contract Cities C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to approve the appointment of C/Ansari as delegate to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and California Contract Cities Association. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES COUNCIL MEMBERS -None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS —Ansari 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99-26: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE RATE INCREASES FOR CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES PROVIDED BY CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL In response to MPT/O'Connor, CM/Belanger stated that notification of the rate increase was given to staff on March 29, 1999. C/Herrera indicated that the subcommittee was notified of the proposed rate increase on April 8 during the scheduled subcommittee meeting. On April 8, the subcommittee requested that this matter be placed on the next (April 20, 1999) Council agenda. CM/Belanger indicated that it is unlikely that this resolution will have an effect on the impending rate increase. However, it is a method for making the Council's wishes known. Clyde Hennessee again pointed out the reasons he favors a competitive market. Nancy Stinson, General Manager, Century Communications, stated that the notification of the rate increase was given to City staff on March 29, 1999 and was presented to the Cable Subcommittee on April 8, 1999. She pointed out the cost benefits and services provided by the cable system. She explained the channels and services to be added within the next couple of months. Moved by C/Huff, seconded by C/Herrera to adopt Resolution No. 99-26 opposing the cable rate increase. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari 9.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-27: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 13 WITH THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the D.B. Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement #13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 and 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-27. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9.3 SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES RE: LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER FORENSIC FACILITY PROJECT - The City Manager has contacted the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter and Hampton, LLP, specifically Jack H. Rubens, regarding representation of the City relative to the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Facility Project. The City Manager has authorized an expenditure SManager to Closed Session held April 15, 1999, Council directed the City contract Mr. Rubens and extend the assignment. The longer term retention requires further action of Council and a budget adjustment. Joseph Farrell stated that he would like the Council to ask the attorney to come up with a better word for use by the Task Force to replace the term "prison" that will more appropriately describe the proposed expansion facility. Fred Encinas asked Council to have Jack Rubens attend the next Council meeting and provide answers to questions that were posed during the town hall meeting. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to enter into a contract and authorize special legal services with the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, in an amount not to exceed $50,000 and allocate $50,000 from the General Fund unallocated fund balance reserves. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: M/Chang recessed the City Council Meeting to the Redevelopment Agency at 12:12 a.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/Chang reconvened the City Council meeting at 12:14 a.m. 10_ COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Herrera thanked staff for their efforts in making the City Birthday Party a success and for their efforts in supporting the opposition of the Lanterman Expansion Project. She asked that the City's POW/MIA flag be flown in honor of the three soldiers who are being held as prisoners as a result of the current conflict in Yugoslavia. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 18 CITY COUNCIL CM/Belanger explained that as a result of an accident, the flag pole at City Hall is not standing. The POW/MIA flag will be flown at Heritage Park Community Center. MPT/O'Connor apologized for not informing the citizens about the Lanterman Expansion Project in a more timely fashion. She was told that the project was a "done deal" and proceeded with the information she was given. As a result of this matter, she resigned from two regional committees in order to devote her time to local issues to insure that citizens are kept as informed as possible about issues that affect D.B. She explained that she attempts to make all of her decisions based on the facts and not with political motivation and that she wanted to be sure that every consideration she makes as a Council Member is legal. She did not want to put the City in jeopardy. C/Huff said he will comment about statements made this evening at the next Council Meeting. 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the meeting at 12:18 a.m. LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk ATTEST: Mayor MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMiVIISSION MARCH 9, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman McManus called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by VC/Tye. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Joe McManus, Vice Chairman Steve Tye and Commissioners George Kuo, Steve Nelson and Joe Ruzicka. Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Ann Lungu, Associate Planner; Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant; Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of February 23, 1999. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve the minutes of February 23, 1999 as presented. Motion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Reorganization of the Planning Commission. DCM/DeStefano opened the nominations for position of Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Kuzicka nominated Commissioner Tye to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Nelson seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. DCM/DeStefano closed the nominations. Commissioner Tye was elected to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: 2. MARCH 9, 1999 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PAGE 2 Kuo, Nelson, Ruzicka, Chair/McManus None VC/Tye None Chair/Tye opened the nominations for Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/McManus nominated Commissioner Nelson. C/Ruzicka seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Chair/Tye closed the nominations. Commissioner Nelson was elected to serve as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Kuo, McManus, Ruzicka, C/Tye None Nelson None Chair/Tye presented a plaque to C/McManus for his service to the Planning Commission as Chairman from March 10, 1998 to March 9, 1999. C/McManus thanked staff for the presentation. DCM/DeStefano stated that from staffs prospective, it has been a remarkable year for the Planning Commission. Major events during the past year under the leadership of Chairman McManus include the approval of the SunCal project which generated over 360 acres of public open space; the arrival and significant contributions of Commissioners Nelson and Kuo; consideration of a number of projects that are now under construction and/or completed and approval of major building construction in the Gateway Corporate Center. He congratulated Chairman McManus and the Planning Commission for their efforts. C/McManus pointed out that he and Commissioner Ruzicka were members of a previous Planning Commission and many of these projects may not have gone forward except for the participation of Commissioners Kuo, Nelson and Tye. Comprehensive Sign Program No. 99-2, a request to install four wall signs and one monument sign. ruuccti 9, 1999 PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: PAGE 3 Diamond Bar Hand Car Wash 2845 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 David Zerner 954 Shumacher Los Angeles, CA 90048 Lance Templeton 2899 Monte Verde Drive Covina, CA 91724 DSA/Smith presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Comprehensive Sign Program No. 99-2, Findings of Fact and conditions as fisted within the resolution. Applicant, Lance Templeton, stated he feels the proposed non -illuminated signage compliments the building as well as the surrounding community. The monument sign will be on a clock timer for illumination. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve Comprehensive Sign Program No. 99-2. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PUBLIC HEARING: Kuo, McManus, Ruzicka, VC/Nelson, Chair/Tye None None 1• Development Review 98-13(1) pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request to revise a project approved by the Planning Commission on November 24, 1998. The approved project allows the construction of a three-story office building of approximately 73,000 square feet and a two-level parking structure on a vacant lot within Gateway Corporate Center. The revision request is to add two levels to the parking structure, thereby allowing a four -level parking structure. PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER: 21950 E. Copley Drive (Lot 23, Tract No. 39679) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Associates c/o AEW Capital Management, LP 601 S. Figueroa, Suite 2150 Los Angeles, CA 90017 MARCH 9, 1999 PAGE 4 APPLICANT: Opus West Corporation 2030 Main Street, Suite 520 Irvine, CA 92614 DCM/DeStefano presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 98-13(1) and Addendum to Negative Declaration No. 98-4, Findings of Fact and conditions listed within the resolution with the following amendment: that Condition (f) on Page 6 related to a secondary access to the parking structure be deleted. Jeff'0. Opus West Corporation, thanked the Planning Commission for their consideration. He explained that his fun has worked extensively with the City's staff and Redevelopment Agency to bring this division of Allstate Insurance to Diamond Bar. It was a competitive situation for this new division of Allstate is creating between Stockton, Modesto, Phoenix and Diamond Bar. He stated that this facility and the Lot 22 f acility are expected to generate in excess of 31 million dollars of annual payroll which would make Allstate the largest private employer in the City of Diamond Bar. All state's goal is to attempt to hire people from the immediate area. He explained the proposed project. C/Ruzicka thanked AssocP/Lungu for conducting a tour of the project. He asked if the Project proposes roof parking and spoke about the concerns of the homeowners living above the project. Mr. Hill responded to C/Ruzicka that approximately half of the roof space will provide parking. The roof will provide downward diffused lighting The distance from the ridge to the project is substantial. It would be difficult to see the structure from the home sites on the ridge. The structure was designed to be tucked up under the hill in an effort to be good neighbors to the homeowners on the ridge. C/Ruzicka said he concurs with the applicant that homeowners would probably have to come out to the edge of their lots in order to see the building. He said he is now assured that the applicant has taken into account the feelings of the people who reside on the ridge above the project and taken every precaution to make certain the building is as unobtrusive as possible. Mr. FRU explained that the after hour usage is anticipated to be about half the amount anticipated during the hours of 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Mr. Hill confirmed to C/McManus that ingress/egress of the parking structure will be at ground level. Chair/Tye asked how the issue of safety has been addressed. W. Hill stated that Allstate will place surveillance cameras on the interior and exterior of the structure. In addition, there is on-site 24-hour seven days per week security. One of the requirements for a facility was to be able to provide a protected site. MARCH 9, 1999 PAGE 5 Chair/Tye closed the public hearing. C/McManus moved, VC/Nelson seconded, to approve Development Review 98-13(l) and Addendum to Negative Declaration No. 984, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution with Condition (f) on Page 6 deleted. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, McManus, Ruzicka, VC/Nelson, Chair/Tye NOES: COMIVIISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Ruzicka thanked Commissioner McManus for his patience, forbearance and open mindedness during his leadership as Chairman of the Planning Commission. VC/Nelson said he is very excited about the economic growth of the City and in particular, the Gateway Corporate Center. He would like to have the City display huge banners that say "SHOP AND EAT IN DIAMOND BAR" which might help to turn the First Interstate Bank building into a restaurant and reopen Casa OBrian's. C/McManus stated he conducts business with a number of people who reside outside of Diamond Bar and that they are now saying that this is a much more business -friendly City. This is a result of the staff being freed up to do their jobs instead of fighting ancillary battles. Chair/Tye thanked Chair/McManus for his efforts last year. He said it has been a pleasure to serve as his Vice Chairman. He thanked the Commissioners for their confidence in making him the Chairman for the next year. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: DCM/DeStefano presented an updated version of the project meeting Projection Matrix and spoke about upcoming projects. He stated that at its February 16 meeting, the City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance to approve the Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance. Applications were submitted by various carriers the next day to begin providing coverage in areas where there are dark spots in the community. The City Council also approved the Planning Commission's recommended General Plan Amendment for open space. Any modification to the open space General Plan classification map or deed restrictions will require a vote of the people prior to conclusion of any project proposal. DCM/DeStefano stated he looks forward to working with Chairman Tye and the newly reorganized Planning Commission. He again thanked Chair/McManus for his service the past year. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As agendized. MARCH 9, 1999 PAGE 6 ADJOURNMENT: C/Ruzicka moved, C/McManus seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Tye adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James :eStefanoSecretto the Planning Commission Attest: l Steven Tye Chairman NIINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH -23,1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Kuo. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Steve Tye, Vice Chairman Steve Nelson and Commissioners George Kuo, Joe McManus and Joe Ruzicka. Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant; Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of March 9, 1999. C/Kuo moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve the minutes of March 9, 1999, as presented. Motion carried 54 OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: None PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Development Review No. 99-2 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020.A) is a request for approval to construct a two-story office building of approximately 42,720 gross square feet (40,900 ne: square feet) to be utilized for general office purposes. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1520 S. Bridge Gate Drive (Lot 15, Tract No. 39679) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 MARCH 23, 1999 PAGE 2 PROPERTY OWNER: Diamond Bar Associates c10 AEW Capital Management, LP 601 S. Figueroa, Suite 2150 Los Angeles, CA 90017 APPLICANT: Opus West Corporation 2030 Main Street, Suite 520 Irvine, CA 92614 DCM/DeStefano presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 99-2, Findings of Fact and conditions listed within the resolution subject to the following recommended modification: That Condition (j) be reworded to read: "The applicant shall provide a crosswalk in the vicinity of Lot 15 and Lot 12 to connect the existing and proposed sidewalks, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer." In response to C/McManus, DCM/DeStefano presented a drawing of the proposed crosswalk. He explained the location of existing and proposed sidewalk in the immediate area of the proposed project. He fin Cher explained the intent of the City Engineer to provide pedestrian linkage throughout the Gateway Corporate Center. C/Kuo pointed out a typographical error on the parking space chart located on Page 4 of staffs report. 153 parking spaces should be corrected to 173 parking spaces. He asked for an explanation of the effectiveness of the proposed traffic mitigation measures. DCM/DeStefano explained that without the implementation of a number of traffic improvements, the level of service (LOS) at Copley Drive and Golden Springs Drive will drop from an acceptable level of C to F. Staff anticipates the installation of a number of different improvements such as lengthening the left throat ingress to Copley Drive, modification of the signal to accommodate the new length of throat, as well as, the related phasing, creating two right turn lanes and two left turn lanes out of Copley Drive, modifying the median in front of Lot 23, etc. C/Ruzicka stated his concerns about the already congested intersection of Grand Avenue at Golden Springs Drive. He asked if the proposed mitigation measures will take care of increased traffic at that intersection. DCM/DeStefano responded that a Comprehensive Environmental Impact Report was produced for the Gateway Corporate Center. Built into that EIR was anticipated buildouts of various product types within the Center. Built into the mitigation measures for the anticipated traffic impacts was a long list of public improvements on Golden Springs Drive and its immediate vicinity. The mitigation measures included signalization, medians, etc. that currently exist. In addition, the developers of the Gateway Corporate Center contributed about $380,000 to the City of Diamond Bar for "downstream" mitigation which included Golden Springs Drive - Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive - Brea Canyon Road, where improvements have been ongoing over the years. This project has met its obligation in contributing to the anticipated impacts. This project will add to the congestion at Golden Springs Drive and Grand Avenue. However, it has paid its mitigation for those impacts. The MARCH 23, 1999 PAGE 3 increased congestion is more a product of transient cut -through traffic. The thousands of building permits that have been issued and constructed in Chino Dills, for example, has had an enormous impact upon Grand Avenue. Chair/Tye stated that one of the conditions for approval of Development Review No. 98-15 and 98-16 was to "restripe the northbound approach on Copley Drive to provide one left turn and dual right turn lanes, and modify the existing traffic signal accordingly. The identified improvements which will be conditions of approval are expected to mitigate the traffic." The identical condition is found on Page 6 of this project. He asked why all three projects contain the same conditions. DCNVDeStefano explained that the repeated conditions are deliberate. The conditions came about as a result of the traffic study that was conducted at the time which took into consideration the anticipated development within the various lots. The conditions are repeated to insure that the improvements are captured by the development. If Lot 22 or Lot 12 is never constructed, the improvements are never implemented. Therefore, the condition insures that the improvements are implemented by repeating the condition for each of the four projects that were a part of the original traffic study. Chair/Tye asked why the focus of the conditions is on Copley Drive and not the same at Gateway Center Drive. DCM/DeStefano stated that the traffic consultant has not recommended consideration of this type of condition at Gateway Center Drive. Based upon the engineering assessment, the assumption is that the majority of the trip generation will be from Copley Drive moving toward Grand Avenue. The majority of the development will be coming off of Copley Drive and Bridge Gate Drive. Jeff Hill, Opus West Corporation, explained the proposed project. He explained that the applicant asked the traffic consultant to look at all three projects in total. The traffic studies have shown that the Gateway Center Drive at Golden Springs Drive intersection is not nearly as impacted as the Copley Drive at Golden Springs Drive intersection. The proposed building is a spec building. There is no specific tenant contemplated for the building at this time. Chair/Tye opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak on this item, Chair Tye closed the public hearing. C/Ruzicka stated his concerns regarding the impact of parking lot lighting and building signage with respect to residents living on the ridge above the project. VC/Nelson asked that language be added to the conditions to provide for minimal impact of lighting upon animals in the immediate area of the project. MARCH 23, 1999 PAGE 4 VC/Nelson moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Development Review 99-2, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution with staffs recommended amendment to Condition 5. G) and with the following statement be added to Condition 5. (d) on Page 6: "The applicant shall install lighting with shielding to insure that it not glare or spill onto adjacent residential properties." Jeff Hill stated that he has no issue with the proposed statement. However, he wants to be certain that he complies with the Sheriff Department's safety and security requirement. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, McManus, Ruzicka, VC/Nelson, Chair/Tye NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Kuo stated he is looking forward to attending the Planners Institute in order to learn more about becoming a professional and contribute more to the community. VC/Nelson said he will be unable to attend the Planners Institute because of family commitments Chair/Tye congratulated VC/Nelson on the occasion of his 25th Wedding Anniversary. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: DCM/DeStefano stated that as Hearing Officer for Administrative Development Review applications, he tonight took action to defer the matter of a room addition to an existing house within "The Country Estates" to the Planning Commission because the project will require a front yard setback -variance. This item will be scheduled for the April 13, 1999 meeting. Opus West has submitted an amendment to Lot 22. It is the intent of Opus West to seek approval for retaining walls surrounding the building on Lot 22 in order to generate about 50-60 additional parking spaces. This project will be an item before the Planning Commission on April 13. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As agendized. MARCH 23, 1999 PAGE 5 ADJOURNMENT: McManus moved, C/Kuo seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Tye adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, 4js DeStefano ry to the PI ng Commission Attest: Steve Tye Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Leonard -Colby called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District Hearing Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chair Morris. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Chair/Leonard-Colby, Vice Chair Morris, and Commissioners Istik, Lin and Virginkar. Also Present were: David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works; Rose Manela, Assistant Engineer; Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant and Sharon Gomez, Administrative Secretary. I. REORGANIZATION OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. DDPW/Liu opened the nominations for Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. Commissioner Virginkar nominated Commissioner Morris. Commissioner Leonard -Colby seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Morris was unanimously elected Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. Chair/Morris opened the nominations for Vice Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. Commissioner Leonard -Colby nominated Commissioner Lin to serve as Vice Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission, Commissioner Virginkar seconded the nomination. Commissioner Lin respectfully declined the nomination. Commissioner Istik nominated Commissioner Virginkar to serve as Vice Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. Commissioner Leonard -Colby seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Virginkar was unanimously elected to serve as Vice Chair of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 11, 1999 PAGE 2 A. Minutes of January 14, 1999 Sheriffs Department Presentation Workshop VC/Virginkar moved, C/Leonard-Colby seconded, to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1999 Traffic and Transportation Commission Workshop as submitted. The motion was approved 4-0-1 with C/Istik abstaining. 2. Regular Meeting of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. VC/Virginkar moved, C/Leonard-Colby seconded, to approve the regular Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting minutes as submitted. The motion was approved 4- 0-1 with C/Istik abstaining. B. Minutes of February 11, 1999. Regular Meeting of the Traffic and Transportation Commission. C/Leonard-Colby moved, VC/Virginkar seconded, to approve the regular Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting minutes as submitted. The motion was approved 5- 0. H. COMMISSION COMMENTS: None Offered. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Installation of red curbs on Pathfinder Road at Presado Drive. DDPW/Liu presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to the City Council the installation of 100 feet of red curb on the north side of Pathfinder Road west of Presado Drive and 50 feet of red curb on the north side of Pathfinder Road on the east side of Presado Drive. C/Leonard-Colby moved, VC/Virginkar seconded, to recommend to the City Council the installation of 100 feet of red curb on the north side of Pathfinder Road west of Presado Drive and 50 feet of red curb on the north side of Pathfinder Road on the east side of Presado Drive. Motion carried by the following vote: MARCH 11, 1999 AYES NOES: ABSENT: PAGE 3 COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Istik, Leonard/Colby, Lin, VC/Virginkar, Chair/Morris None None V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Longview Drive and Eastgate Drive. DDPW/Liu presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission discuss the issue of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Longview Drive and Eastgate Drive and make its recommendation to the City Council. Following discussion, the Commission concurred to request staff to further investigate other intersections along Longview Drive and bring forth its recommendation. B. Parking Issue on Fallow Field Drive. DDPW/Liu presented staff s report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission discuss and review the parking issues on Fallow Field Drive and concur with staffs recommendation to remove the existing "2 -Hour Parking, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday - Friday" signs along Fallow Field Drive and Pasco Court and replace with "No Parking, Except by Permit" signs; and to remove the existing "No Parking, 6 a.m. - 8 a.m., Monday — Friday" signs in front of the FMC property on Fallow Field Drive and replace with "No Parking, Except by Permit" signs. Armondo Farmacona, 20940 Pasco Court, stated that carpoolers do not use the street for parking, rather it's the FMC employees, His concern is about the sight visibility on Pasco Court at Fallow Field Drive. Gary Ditford, 3130 Fallow Field Drive, supported the parking permit system. However, he questioned why he has to obtain a parking permit in order to park in front of this residence. He stated that he needs five annual parking permits. VC/Virginkar suggested that if the problem hours on Fallow Field Drive are between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., the recommendation might be to place signs on the street that say "No Parking, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday -Friday, Except by Permit". C/Leonard-Colby said she would prefer to require First Mortgage Corporation to use their parking lot and not the City streets for parking. The neighborhood problems are a result of abuse by the commercial business. MARCH 11, 1999 PAGE 4 C/Istik said that he believes that the number of First Mortgage Corporation's on-site parking spaces, the number of County provided spaces as well as, the parking spaces available in front of the business are sufficient to allow for future growth. He is concerned that the Commission is considering this matter without being provided all of the available information. He stated that he is not in favor of posting the street "Parking by Permit Only". Such a restriction is not something he would like to see if he was selling a house in the area. Such a consideration takes away from the integrity of the neighborhood. He said he believes that restricting parking on a primarily residential street (Fallow Field Drive) is a terrible precedent for the City to set. VC/Virginkar stated he does not favor issuing parking permits to First Mortgage Corporation. He prefers to restrict commercial parking on the street to directly in front of the business which will allow residents to park in front of their residences during 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Chair/Morris said he believes it is questionable for the City to grant exclusive parking rights to a commercial business on a residential street. He suggested that the time be limited as suggested by VC/Virginkar, place the signs beyond First Mortgage Corporation, leave the area in front of First Mortgage Corporation open parking and limit the distance for permit requirement to a reasonable distance down Fallow Field Drive and Pasco Court. C/Leonard-Colby stated she would like to eliminate parking on the west side of Fallow Field Drive to improve the look of the neighborhood and which still allows sufficient parking for the commercial. C/Istik pointed out that First Mortgage Corporation has exclusive parking on a dedicated public street. Residents are required to obtain permits in order to park on the street. DDPW/Liu stated that First Mortgage Corporation indicated that even if the County allows approximately fifty (50) cars to park across Brea Canyon Cut -Off Road they will still need the parking spaces in front of the business to accommodate employee parking. First Mortgage Corporation feels that they have been a good neighbor and that the City needs to balance the needs of both the residents and the business. C/Leonard-Colby moved to remove the existing "2 -Hour Parking, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday — Friday" signs along Fallow Field Drive and Pasco Court and replace with "No Parking, 8 a.m. - 5 P.m., Monday -Friday, Except by Permit" signs; and to remove the existing "No Parking, 6 a.m. - 8 a.m., Monday - Friday" signs in front of the FMC property on Fallow Field Drive and replace with "No Parking, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m., Monday -Friday, Except by Permit" signs; post "No Parking Anytime" sign on the west side of Fallow Field Drive immediately across from First Mortgage Corporation, and reinvestigate the necessity of installing red curbing at Pasco Court. VC/Virginkar amended the motion to include the following language for replacement signage: MARCH 11, 1999 W PAGE 5 "Parking, 8 a.m.- 5 p.m., Monday - Friday, Residential Parking Permit Only" from the first house immediately north of FMC and along Fallow Field Drive including Pasco Court up to Malad Court on both sides of Fallow Field Drive and place "No Parking, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday — Friday" signs directly across from First Mortgage Corporation on the west side of Fallow Field Drive. C/Leonard-Colby accepted the amendment. C/Lin seconded the amended motion. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Leonard -Colby, Lin, VCNirginkar, Chair/Morris NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Istik ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C/Istik explained the reason for his "NO" vote is because he is not assured that the number of allocated parking spaces is for current usage or future usage by First Mortgage Corporation. NEW BUSINESS: A. Installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and High Crest Drive. DDPW/Liu presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission discuss staffs recommendation to install 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive and make its recommendation to the City Council. Following discussion, C/Leonard-Colby moved, C/Lin seconded, to recommend that the City Council approve installation of 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Istik left the meeting at 9:10 p.m. VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS: Leonard -Colby, Lin, VCNirginkar Istik, Chair/Morris None DDPW/Liu reported that at its February 16, 1999 meeting, the City Council conducted a short term traffic solutions study session. The Council was presented with updated information on traffic volumes and the impact to Grand Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard as well as, turning movements in and out of the shopping centers at the intersection. On March 2, 1999, the City Council approved the Traffic and MARCH 11, 1999 PAGE 6 Transportation Commission's recommendation to install multi -way stop signs at Santaquin Drive and Redgate Drive, Kiowa Crest Drive at Deerfoot Drive as well as, Mountain Laurel Drive at Pecan Grove Drive. In addition, the Council approved the installation of red curb at the intersection of Pasco Court and Fallow Field Drive. On March 16, 1999, the Council will consider the Commission's recommendation to reinstate the crosswalk at Walnut Elementary School and establishment of a loading zone in front of the school. The Sheriffs Department will present information regarding the results of the increased patrol in the vicinity of the Diamond Bar schools. VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: C/Leonard-Colby asked if the City is working with the traffic signal timing on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Quail Summit Drive and if the driveway alignment is completed. DDPW/Liu responded that physical improvements have been made to both locations. The signal timing at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue is still on recall. The Quail Summit Drive signal is fully functional. VC/Virginkar said he would like for the Commission to have been invited to participate in the study session regarding short term traffic solutions for Diamond Bar Boulevard and Grand Avenue. On behalf of C/Istik, Chair/Morris asked that the matter of changing the Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. be placed on the April 8 agenda for discussion. Chair/Morris asked that the following items be placed on the April 8, 1999 agenda: An update regarding seepage on the City's streets, as well as, staff s recommendation for the potential for a three-way stop at the intersection of Bellena Drive and Palomino Drive. IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF: A. Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update: None presented. X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: A. Future Agenda Items. B. Verbal Presentation by DSA/7oe: Street lights on Diamond Bar Boulevard between Crooked Creek Drive and Cold Spring Lane. C. Verbal Presentation by DDPW/Liu: Water schedule of Diamond Bar Boulevard medians between Quail Summit Drive and Brea Canyon Road. MARCH 11, 1999 PAGE 7 XI. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY MEETINGS: As agendized. C/Leonard-Colby stated she has tickets available for the Friends of the Library Wine Soiree on Sunday, April 25, 1999. All proceeds go to the Diamond Bar Library, ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Traffic and Transportation Commission Chair/Morris adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully, /s/ David G. Liu David G. Liu Secretary Attest: /s/ Roland Morris Roland Morris Chair CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION HEARING BOARD ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D. 21865 Copley Drive FEBRUARY 25, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Finnerty called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner Holder. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Finnerty, Vice Chairman Nolan and Commissioners Anis, Holder and Pruitt. C/Pruitt arrived at 7:15 p.m. Staff: Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Don Hensley, Parks & Maintenance Superintendent; Wendy Bowman, Community Supervisor; and Marsha Roa, Administrative Secretary. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1.1 Approval of Minutes of January 28, 1999 Regular Commission Meeting. C/Holder moved, Chair/Finnerty seconded, to approve the minutes of January 28, 1999 as presented. Motion carried 3-0-1 with VC/Nolan abstaining and C/Pruitt being absent. 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: FEBRUARY 25, 1999 PAGE 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 2.1 Recreation Update CSS/Bowman presented the recreation update. 2.2 City Birthday Party Update: CSD/Rose stated that the next City Birthday Party committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 4, 1999 at 9:00 at the City Hall. Currently, the committee is planning the event marketing. One of the commercials is completed and will be aired on the regular television cable channels. The commercial will be previewed on March 4. Two of the three planned commercials have been completed. On Tuesday the City Council will consider whether to allocate additional monies to the budget for the purchase of banners that contain a birthday logo. The committee is considering proposals from five different ride vendors. 2.3 CIP Projects Update - Oral Report. CSD/Rose presented updates on the following projects: a. ADA Retrofit of Heritage and Ronald Reagan Parks b. Lorbeer Ballfield Lighting 3. OLD BUSINESS: 3.1 Parks Maintenance Update. PMS/Hensley reported on the Commission's first walk through of each of the City's parks, problems that were reported as well as, actions taken. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that the City is responding to the Ronald Reagan Park neighbor's concerns. The tennis court lights are being changed and the bounce houses has been moved over to the side of the tennis court away from the block walls adjacent to the houses. VC/Nolan reminded staff that the upper Sycamore Canyon sidewalk area is still in need of maintenance. He suggested that the matter be scheduled as a bi-annual service project. FEBRUARY 25, 1999 4. PAGE 3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION The Commission agreed to the following scheduled park visits: C/Pruitt C/Anis Chair/Finnerty C/Pruitt C/Ani s VC/Nolan Chair/Finnerty VC/Nolan C/Holder 3.2 Park Rules Signage Summitridge Park Heritage Park Peterson Park Sycamore Canyon Park Ronald Reagan Park Paul C. Grow Park Maple Hill Park Pantera Park Starshine Park Thursday, March 11 - 9:00 a.m. Friday, March 19 - 9:30 a.m. Thursday, March 25 - 9:00 a.m. Thursday, April 1 - 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, April 7 - 9:30 a.m. Thursday, April 15 - 9:00 a.m. Thursday, April 22 - 9:00 a.m. Thursday, April 29 - 9:00 a.m. Thursday, May 6 - 9:00 a.m. Following discussion, C/Holder moved, C/Pruitt seconded, to approve the following 7 Park Rules signs and that the signs will consist of blue lettering on a white background and be 24" wide by 36" high. Motion carried 5-0. Park Hours (sign will state park hours) 2. Dogs Must Remain on Leash 3. Owner Must Remove Animal Waste 4. Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited 5. Golfing Prohibited 6. Operation of Model Airplanes/Rockets Prohibited 7. Fires Only in Park Barbecues NEW BUSINESS: 4.1 Commission Priorities for 1999/2000 Fiscal Year. The Commission concurred to add the following items to the priorities list: A. Establish a 501(c)(3) Foundation FEBRUARY 25, 1999 PAGE 4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION B. Establish ongoing dialogue with the school districts Chair/Finnerty asked staff to provide a list of improvements anticipated for each school to assist the Commissioners in the pursuit of a dialogue with the school districts. 4.2 Review of Participation in 1999 C.P.R.S. Conference in Santa Clara. Each Commissioner presented a report on their attendance at the conference. Chair/Finnerty discussed the possibility of formulating a youth committee to participate in the design and construction of a skateboard facility. She spoke about the possibility of contractors contributing to the City's public art program and about grant monies that are available for "Heart -Smart Cities". C/Anis spoke about her attendance at various sessions. She said she was impressed with the methods Santa Clara incorporated in the process of constructing a skateboard park and most particularly the inclusion of the youth. She emphasized the importance of a high quality design, that the design incorporate the features desired by the skaters, and that roller bladers are included in the process. She attended a session regarding city brochures and spoke about three cities that saved money by having their brochures printed at the same time by the same printer. C/Pruitt said she attended several sessions including the "heart -smart cities". She said she liked the emphasis on community involvement and making people aware of what they can do to stay healthy. Although she was unable to attend the skateboard park session, she gathered materials from vendors which she presented to staff. She spoke about attending a session on communications between commissioners and staff members. She attended rock climbing wall exhibits. She commented that the seminar was very good and she looks forward to attending next year's conference. C/Holder said the weekend was wonderful and an excellent opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to bond. She stated she likes the "village" concept and she is concerned about the opportunities for teenagers to be involved and participate in sports and events in Diamond Bar. She liked the climbing wall. She learned that the majority of people who use parks are seniors and not youth. VC/Nolan stated he felt the conference was a very worthwhile endeavor. He expressed appreciation for the high level of professionalism and dedication of staff FEBRUARY 25, 1999 PAGE 5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION members. He said he felt that the skateboard session was one of the better sessions and the key to success is to have youth involved in the design and construction of a facility. He likes the idea of a contest on the design and allowing the winner to have a portion of what he designs incorporated in the park. He suggested the Council Members judge the designs, etc. He likes the idea of future parks having a teen center and spectator area adjacent to a skateboard park. In his view, the next best seminar promoted inter-generationally motivated centers with facilities that allow youth, adults and seniors to interact. He spoke about attending a developing youth seminar which promoted single -caring adults interacting with at -risk youth. He said he enjoyed the conference and the feeling that it promotes the value of Commissioner's participation. C/Pruitt stated that the award for Pantera Park was awesome. CSS/Bowman spoke about attending a surprise session which promoted repackaging events and using humor to get youth interested in participating in various activities. She also attended sessions that pertained to parks and recreation staffing and staff evaluations. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Anis stated that the Brahma's Casino Night will be held tomorrow night at 7:00. The charge is $15 per person and the event will be held in the Diamond Bar High School gymnasium. Friends of the Diamond Bar Library will hold their Wine Soiree on Sunday, April 25 from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Shilo Hilltop. The charge is $25 per person and all of the proceeds go to the library. She spoke about cities that have used the internet for their Parks and Recreation Guide. Registration forms are included. She encouraged the City to consider using the internet. C/Pruitt stated there will be a skate demonstration at Trinity Board on Sunday, March 28. In association with Diamond Bar High School, C.I.F. Championship Dinner will be held on Saturday. She presented a copy of a petition with 300 signatures favoring a skateboard park. FEBRUARY 25, 1999 PAGE 6 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business to come before the Commission, Chair/Finnerty adjourned the meeting at 10:22 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, /a/ 'Rob Rose Bob Rose Secretary Attest: /s/ Annette Finnerty Annette Finnerty Chairman (,,,z. C2 -- CITY CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION HEARING BOARD ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D. 21865 Copley Drive MARCH 25, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Finnerty called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner Anis. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Finnerty, Vice Chairman Nolan and Commissioners Anis, Holder and Pruitt. Staff: Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Wendy Bowman, Recreation Supervisor; and Marsha Roa, Administrative Secretary. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: Thom Pruitt commended the Commissioners for their accomplishments on behalf of the City during the past year - the opening of Pantera Park, adoption of the Parks Master Plan, the City Birthday Party and planting the seeds for construction of a skateboard park. He thanked each Commissioner for their participation and promotion of the Pop Warner Football and Cheerleading organization. In post season play, three teams participated in bowls against other cities. Two of the teams became champions and one team placed second. Pop Warner will sponsor its annual golf tournament on May 3, 1999 at Via Verde Country Club. He invited the Commissioners to attend. He also thanked the Commissioners for initiating participation by individuals to clean up after their dogs. 1. REORGANIZATION OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: 1.1 Election of Chairman Chair/Finnerty opened the nominations for Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission. MARCH 25, 1999 PAGE 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Chair/Finnerty nominated Dan Nolan to serve as Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission for the term March, 1999 through February, 2000. Commissioner Pruitt seconded the nomination. There being no further nominations, Chair/Finnerty closed the nominations. Dan Nolan was unanimously elected to serve as Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission. 1.2 Election of Vice Chairman Chair/Nolan opened the nominations for Vice Chairman. Chair/Nolan nominated Commissioner Pruitt to serve as Vice Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission. Commissioner Anis seconded the nomination. There being no further nominations offered, Chair/Nolan closed the nominations. Commissioner Pruitt was unanimously elected to serve as Vice Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: 2.1 Approval of Minutes of February 25, 1999 Regular Commission Meeting. C/Finnerty moved, VC/Pruitt seconded, to approve the minutes of February 25, 1999 as presented. Motion carried 5-0 by Roll Call vote. 3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 3.1 Recreation Update: RS/Bowman presented the recreation update. RS/Bowman asked for the Commissioner's assistance in obtaining the Pomona School District's help to distribute recreation flyers. She offered to accompany the Commissioners to school sites, provide Commissioners with a list of contacts and have staff members place flyers in school mailboxes. MARCH 25, 1999 W PAGE 3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Chair/Nolan offered to contact Golden Springs Elementary School and Lorbeer Middle School. He suggested that a Commissioner/staff member attend the school district board meeting. CSD/Rose recommended that the Commissioners first contact school principals. VC/Pruitt stated she will contact Armstrong Elementary School officials. 10th City Birthday Party Update: CSD/Rose presented the report. C/Holder suggested that the Community Services Department provide an information booth manned by staff and Commissioners. She said she envisions having a copy of the Parks Master Plan with a visual presentation to show what is planned for the community. She further suggested that a booth be provided at the high school's April 17 event. Nick Anis suggested that the Commission provide a map of the City's parks together with a list of facilities available at each location. C/Finnerty suggested that the overhead picture of the City be used to provide visual information regarding park locations. VC/Pruitt recommended that written information be provided with respect to what the Parks & Recreation Commission's function is and the fact that it is an advisory Commission to the City Council. C/Holder suggested that a "fact sheet" be provided at the booth to update people on status of the Community Center/Civic Center Task Force's discussions. 3.3 Update of Heritage/Ronald Reagan Park ADA Retrofit. CSD/Rose presented the report. He stated that the Contract has been awarded to 4 -Con for the Heritage/Ronald Reagan Park ADA Retrofit. Construction will commence at both parks on April 5, 1999. Construction is anticipated to be completed by June 30, 1999. MARCH 25, 1999 PAGE 4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION C/Holder indicated that construction may interfere with the June 9 or 10 Castle Rock Elementary School 5th grade picnic. CSD/Rose responded that the contractor will provide a detailed schedule of completion. The grass area, barbecue areas, community center and restrooms should be available as well. The area most likely to be blocked off for the longest period of time during construction is the Tot Lot area. 3. OLD BUSINESS - None 4. NEW BUSINESS - None ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Holder stated her son is the top shot putter for Diamond Bar High School. Several colleges are calling him and there may be a track scholarship in the offing. C/Anis congratulated Chair/Nolan and VC/Pruitt on their appointments. She expects the Commission to have a great year under their leadership. She commended C/Finnerty for the wonderful work she has done on behalf of the City. The Friends of the Library is holding a Used Book Sale on Friday and Saturday, March 27 and 28 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. She reminded the Commission about the Friends of the Library Wine Tasting Soiree on April 25 from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Shilo Hilltop. She stated she is enjoying her new job with the Walnut/Diamond Bar weekly newspaper doing ad designs. t to be C/Finnerty congratulated the Community ServlDivision obtainingShe athanked here fellow used for playground resurfacing at SycamoreYon Park Commissioners for their time, effort and hard work during her tenure as Chairman. VC/Pruitt thanked the Commission for their support and C/Finnerty for her leadership. The City Birthday Party Celebration meetings are eingstrong.She inhfullaid she is swing for theng Pop WarnderoGo'If weekend's track meet. She reiterate thatpan Tournament. Chair/Nolan commended C/Finnerty for her service as Chairman of the Commission. He appreciates the Commission's support and enthusiasm, and he is looking forward to another great year. He stated he was elected the Regional Commissioner for AYSO and because his daughter suffered a second knee injury, he withdrew his nomination. MARCH 25, 1999 PAGE 5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION CSD/Rose announced that Chair/Nolan is the 1999 reigning Rotary Club golf champion based upon last Monday's tournament. ADJOURNMENT: C/Finnerty moved, C/Anis seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no other business to come before the Commission, Chair/Nolan adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bob Rose Bob Rose Secretary Attest: / 8 //-gin No, Dan Nolan Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor and Councilmember Herrera FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, May 4, 1999 DATE: April 30, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated May 4, 1999. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to its entry on the Consent Calendar. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listinq of vouchers dated 050499 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts FUND DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND 010 LIBRARY SERVICES 112 'PROP A - TRANSIT FUND 115 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FUND 125 COM DEV BLK GRANT FUND 138 LLAD #38 FUND 139 LLAD #39 FUND 141 LLAD #41 FUND 250 CAPITAL IMPROV/PROJ FUND REPORT FOR ALL FUNDS APPROVED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Finance Director Terrence L. Belanger City Manager PREPAID VOUCHERS TOTAL 84,210.79 264`656.87 348,867.66 .00 1,736.03 1,736.03 ~V0 47`111.82 47,111./82 '00 2,231.25 2,231.25 .00 193.31 193.31 .00 4,280.85 41280.85 .00 3,900.00 3`900.00 .00 2,166.17 2,166.17 .00 33,172.80 33,172.80 84,210.79 4+e,659.0, 359,*4 zo Deborah H. O'Connor Mayor Pro Tem Carol Herrera Councilmember RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:13:18 RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT 3CMA 0014095 -42315 -- ACCURATE LANDSCAPE 0015322-45300-- 0015319-42210-- 0015318-42210-- 1:385533-4'210-- 0015K5-45300-- 0015310-41200-- 0015322-45300-- 0015316-42210-- 1415541-45500-- 0015318-45300-- 0015316-45300-- 1385538-42210-- 1395539-45500-- 1385538-45500-- 0015.1j19-45300-- 0015313-45:00-- 0015311-45300-- 00153:31-45300-- ADRIANA GARCIA 001-347'30- - AJAX SIGN GRAPHICS INC 0014090-41200-- AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 00151216-4230-- AMERICANA ART CHINA CO 0014075 -41400 -- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 VOUCHER REGISTER DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PO INVOICE DESCRIPTION 8627 ENTRY FEES-3CMA AWARDS TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR PAGE: 1 PAGE: 1 PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK 225.0? .00 225.00 _:5.00 9904006 APR MAINT - R. REA3AN 1,013.25 APRIL ADDNL MAINT-APR.F'ETERSON 70.00 APRIL ADDL MAINT-APR PANTERA 300.00 APRIL ADDNL MAINT-APR.DIST Q 305.85 990400= APR MAINT - STARSHINE 345.46 8017 19033 PAPER SUPPLS-PARKS 294.00 9904006 APR MAINT - SUMMITRIDGE 2,000.51 APRIL ADD -1 MAINT-APR MAPLEHILL 65.00 9904006 APR MAINT - DIST #41 2,000.00 9904006 APR MAINT - PANTERA 2.500.99 9904006 APR MAINT - MAPLE HILL 690.83 APRIL ADDNL MAINT-APR.DIST 33 575.00 9904006 APR MAINT - DIST #39 3,900.00 9904006 APR MAINT - DIST #38 3-400.00 9904006 APR MAINT - PETERSON 1,454.38 9904006 APR MAINT - HERITAGE 587.21 9904006 APR MAINT - P. GROW 863.54 9904006 APR MAINT - SYC CYN 690.83 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 217056•?5 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 21,056.85 J�tGLi RECREATION REFUND 150.00, TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 150.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 150.00 122 WALL FRAME & NAMEPLATE 19.39 TOTAL PREFAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 19.39 TOTAL IUE VENDOR 19.39 NATL PLPiG CONF-4/24-LUNGU 130.00 05/04/1999 35381 TOTAL PREPAIDS 130.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 130.00 8465 13868 MUGS -10TH ANNIV. CELEB 535.85 TOTAL PREFAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS `35.85 i sE535 TOTAL DUE vNi�DR 6, CITY OF DIAM[ CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE*. 2 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK AMERICOMP IMAGING SYSTEMS 0014095-42205-- 3584 COMPUTER MAINT.SVCS 840.83 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS840.83 _ TOTAL DUE VENDOR 340.83 EILEEN ANSARI 0014010-42330-- REIM NTL LEAG CONF-3/5-9 294.47 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 294.47 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 294.47 ARROW RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT 0015318-46250-- 8461 302 EQUIPMT PANTERA PARK 2,455.73 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,455.73 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,455.7:3 AT&T 0014090-42125-- LONG DIST. PHONE SVCS 147.44 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 147.44 TOTAL IUE VENDOR 147.44 AT&T WIRELESS 00140 '-i�-"2f25-- CELL SVCS - GENERAL 30.54 0014415-421"25-- CELL SVCS -VOLUNTEER PATRL 34.4' 0014411-42'125-- CELL SVCS - SHERIFFS 114. 2 0014010-42125-- CELL SVCS - CITY COUNCIL :38.97 0014030-42125-- CELL SVCS - CITY MANAGER 117.57 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 385.38 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ATHENS SERVICES 0(:'15510-4.5501-- 7859 MARCH 1-31 ST.SWEEP SVCS -MARCH 99 8,463.80 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 8,863.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 8,86-2.80 CITY OF BREA 0015350-45300-- 7916 642::? RECREATION SVCS -MAR 99 43,196.42 0015350-41200-- 7917A 64208 RECREATION PRGM SUPPLIES 5,611.01 0014095-42205-- 64241 PROF SVCS - TECH SUPPORT 360.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 49,167.43 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 4x,167.43 BRIAN ROBERTS 0014090-40}0-- 7683 A/V SVCS -COUNCIL MTG 4/6 210.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL 'VOUCHERS 21 .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1kl) CITY OF DIA04D BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:17 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE::3 DUE THRU: 05104/1999 PREPAID FMD/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # 1 INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK JULIE BUTTERFIELD 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 75.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS A_ 75.0? TOTAL DUE VENDOR 75.00 CA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY 0014050-42340-- CONF-JUNE 23-25 MAGNUSON 650.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 650.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 650.00 ROBIN C.ALLOT 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 49.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 49.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 49.(10 CAPIO 0014095-42330— ANNUL CONF-4/28-30-NESLON 220.00 05/04/1999 35323 TOTAL PREPAIDS 220.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR .'0.00 CASH 0015.350-42353-- CASH ADVANCE-ANNV CELEE 300.00 05104/1999 35378 TOTAL PREPAIDS 300.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 300.00 VIC*KY J CASTRO N)1-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 45.(x) TOTAL PREPAID .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 45.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 45.00 AUGUSTA CATALANO 001-334720-- RECREATION REFUND 93.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 93.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 93.00 COCA 0014030-42325-- GEN MTG 3125 CMGR 10,00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 20.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 20.00 CCEC 0015210-42340-- WORKSHOP 5/7-FLORES 25.00 05/04/1999 35382 TOTAL PREPAIDS 25,00 TOTHL VOUCHERS .Vo Ti+TAL DUE VENDOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29%1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 4 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PUN'D "'SECT —ACCT —PROJECT— ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK CAROLYN CHANG 001-34730-- RECREATION REFUND 160.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS w_ 160.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 160.00 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 001—::011-- 210/211/190 PROF SVCS—FEP 92-001 906.42 001-23010-- '10,'211/190 PROF SVCS—FPL 92-30 75.00 001-23011-- m/211/190 PROF SVCS—FER 92-001 759.58 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2.391.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2.391.00 MIRANDA CHOW 001-34780—. RECREATION REFUND 44.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 44,)x} TOTAL DUE VENDOR 44,00 CINTAS CORPORATION 001•`_:310-42130-- 7539 150219109 UNIFORMS—PARK: STAFF -4/19 19.47 0015:310-42130-- 7539 150217903 UNIFORMS—PARK STAFF -4/12 19.47 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 38.94 TOTAL DUE VENDOR J8.94 CLOWNING.AROUND 0015350-42'.353-- 8674 PETTINGZOO—ANV CELEB-4/18 350.00 05/04/1999 3531.", TOTAL PREPAIDS :350,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 350.00 COFFEESMITH COMPANY 0014690-42130-- 766 4050 WATER LEASE — MARCH 99 17.95 0014090-4235-- It}6, ?10, COFFEE SUPPLIES 84,80 0014,690-42130-- 7665 4112 WATER LEASE — APRIL 99 17.95 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 120.70 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 120.70 COOPER DELIVERY SERVICE 14 CK! -42121-- 18 1611 DELIVER'' SVCS — LANTERMAE! 35,Oia T TAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 35,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR CSB SCOUT P -:C}:: 777 0015350-4235::-- 8647 CLEAN—UP SVCS—ANINV CELEB 100.00 05/04/1999 3 374 TOTAL PREPAIDS 100.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 5 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND,SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-'ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK D&J ENGINEERING 0015220-45201-- 99DB-04 BLDG&SFTY SVGS -3/15-4/16 125,904.82 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VDUIHERSr 125,904.83 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 125,904,83 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES 2505310-46415-11298-46415 7965A DBAR000:3 PROF SVCS-LORBEER LGHTS 571.00 2;05310-46415-- 05-7157 ADA RETROFIT-REAGAN PARK 51`.09 2505310-46415-- 05-7157 ADA RETROFIT -HERITAGE PK 515,09 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,601.18 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.601.18 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER 0014090-42110-- 867.3 PRTG SVCS-LANTERMAN 1,266.53 00141190-42,110-- 85:5 PRTG SVCS-LANTERMAN 617,00 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,833,5:3 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,&;3,53 DEKRA-LITE 0015350-4235}-- 990:349 BANNERS -10TH ANNIVERSARY 2,302.20 0014095-46250-- 8493 990:18 BANNERS -10TH ANNIVERSARY 3,336.90 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 5,63'?,10 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 5,64,10 CAROL DENNIS )_ 14;'40-44(:1;1+-- 7757 DBCC0406 MNT SECRTRY SVC-CCNC1. 460.00 0014!)4if-441)011-- 7757 0408 MNT SECRTRY SVC-CCNCL MTG 80.170 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,t)(, TOTAL VOUCHERS 540.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 540,00 JAMES i!ESTEFANO REIMS PLNF. INS? -=','24-:: 454.112 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 454,02 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 454,02 DEWAN LUNIIIIN & ASSOCIATES 251}5511)-46411-12098-46411 05577 OB -010-4 PROF SVCS-AMBUSHERS 581.00 2-505510-46411-121980-46411, C5577 11tB-010-4 PROF SVCS-MEADOWGLEN 581.00 2505 15-464'20-06799-4642:) `:58 DB -0111-1 CDBG PROD -HANDICAP RAMP 13,004,00 11` ' = 46420-{;67f�?-464",1 555' DB -01"-2 CDBG PFOJ-HANDICAP RAMP 4.636.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 8,802.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 8,302,00 DIAMOND PEAR CHAMBER OF COKMIERCE X7,5. -��A ;ten �: o , PROF SVCS -FEE: MAF' 'a9 & 2,0011,00 TOTAL PREFAIDS 110 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER'REGISTER PAGE: 6 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECI DIAMOND BAR INTERNATIONAL DELI 0014090-42325-- 8248 496 TRES HERMANOS MTG-4/14/99 53.86 TOTAL PREPAIDS .U0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 53,86 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 53,86 DIAMOND PHOTO 0014095-42112-- 7515A 19684.!44!45 PHOTO DEVLP 36,01 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,U0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 36.01 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 36.01 ANGELA DIDONATO 001-3470-- RECREATION REFUND 35.00 TOTAL PRI PAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 35. W. TOTAL DUE VENDOR 35.00 DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INC 1125553-45529-- 7671 4/7/99 DIAMOND RIDE SVCS -:3/16-31 11,182,82 TOTAL PREPAIDS 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 11,182.82 TOTAL DUE VE'CIOR 11.182.82. DOGGIE WALK BAGS 0015316-42210-- 001531:'-42210-- 8:3r:_ 4:24':12 SUPPLIES - MAPLE HILL Pf': 3. 3.': 02 _ (0 5 1 ,:;�1-4210-- 492402 SUPPLI€S - HERITAGE PARK 213.35 4 5Q SUPPLIES - R REAGAN PAR. :320.00 0015 18-42'10 i:t.5 49240.' SUPPLIES - PANTERA PARK ;320.02 00153-111-42L10- 8365 492402 SUPPLIES - PAUL C GROW PK 213.35 TOTAL PREPAID' .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,336.74 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,386.74 SHIRLEY DROZDOWSKI 001-:34780-- RECREATION REFUND 1:.•7.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 130.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 130.00 DOROTHEA FATHERLY 0'.1-:34720-- _ REFUND FOR VINO & CASINO 21.00 001-34730-- 49574 REFUND FOR SANTA ANITA 11.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS 06 TOTAL VOUCHERS :32.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 32.00 EIS ENVIRONIIENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES 0;115210-44240-- 86(17 990302-0I PROF SVCS-LANTERMAN PROJ 3,836.80 0017110-44440--c 60' 1 9QO402-91 PROF SVCS-LANTERMAN PRQJ 2,816.80 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 6.703,60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 6,70:.60 CITY OF DIAMOND DAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 7 DUE THRU: 05/0411999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK. NERISSA FEATHER 001-34780-- 305225 RECREATION REFUND 50.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS 001-23010-- 480673987 EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 90-017 16.00 001-023010— 480673987 EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 98-061 16.00 0014090-42120-- 4030673987 EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL GOVT 124.25 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 156.25 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 156.25 PRISCILLA FERRERI 001-34780-- 30820 RECREATION REFUND 44.0c! TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 44.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 44.00 FOOD SYSTEMS INC. 0014090-42325-- 8249 16792 CITY COUNCIL MTG-4/6/99 164.81 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 164.81 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 164.81 GALE NEBB SAFETY IN SPORTS °: AIF; SH 0015"s50-42'353-- 0-648 PERFORMANCE-ANNV CELEB 1,450.00 05/04/1999 35375 TOTAL PREPAIDS 1.450.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS ,04 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,450,00 GFE FRIEDRICH R ASSOCIATES INC 2505510-46411-- C7013 990212 PROF -SVCS -SLURRY SEAL 1 2,250.00 0015551-45223-- ?939 9904-04/12 PROF.SVCS-DID BLVD 15.62 0015510-45227-- 821 9904-04/12 PROF.SVCS-FLINTROCK. 416.05 2505510-46411-01498-46411 9904-04,12 PROF SVCS -SLURRY SEAL 1 9.268.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 12,119.67 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 12,119.67 GRAINGER 0015310-42210-- 440;'33::29170 PARK SUPPLIES 23.77 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 23,77 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 23,77 ,-,TE CALIFORNIA 0015331-42125-- 909860:'951 PH.SVCS-SYC CYN PARK 59.99 0015331-42125-- 90:39601'%4 PH.SVCS-SYC CYN PARK38.82 TOTAL PREPAIDS .0c, TOTAL DUEVENDOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: g DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # IN'VOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK GTE LEASING 0014090-42130-- 7688 2^11680 EQUIP RENT - MAY 9y 466.79 TOTAL PREPAIDS loo TOTAL VOUCHERS a_ 466.79 TOTAL DUE VENDOR. 466.79 DEBORAH HARPER 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 60.00 TOTAL P'REPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 60.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 60,(X) PAUL HAST 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 65.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 65.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 65.00 CAROL HERRERA 0014010-42330-- REIMB.-SACRAMENTO 4/21/99 23.95 TOTAL PREPAID .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 23,95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 23.95 HIGHPOINT 0014045-42111-- PREPRESS SVCS-BUS.CARDS 21,65 0014017.5-42111-- ?5:;5(17 PREPRESS SVCS-MUMR NWSLTR 847.60 0014095-42111-- PREPRESS SVCS-BUS.CARDS 21.65 0014095-42111-- PREPRESS SVCS -GENERAL 25.98 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOT14L VOUCHERS 916.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ?16.88 HOME BASE 0014190-42115-- 2625 SUPPLIEr. - WOOD STAKES 129.64 TOTAL P'REPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 129.64 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 129.64 HOME DEPOT 001532-42210-- 1:09145.= MISC.SUPPLIES-PETERSON PK 126.78 TOTAL PREPAIDS On TOTAL VOUCHERS 126.78 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 126.78 ANDY HUANG 001-34780-- 303177 RECREATION REFUND 70.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 70.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 70.00 RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER RESISTER PAGE: 9 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PC # INVOICE DESCRIPTIONPREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK J. MICHAEL HULS 1155515-45500-- 1155515-45500-- 7822A WASTE/ENVRNMTt MNGMT-MAR 1,353.75 0415510-44240-- 7822A WASTE/ENL'RNMTL MNGMT-MAR 877.50 782- MNGMT-MAR 152,50 TOTAL PREPAIDS,PREPAIDS,WASTE%EWRNMTL .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2 3G3 75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR r,.-: 5 L, JVJ. 7 ICMA RETIREMENT -401 001-2110$-- F'P7/8/9 PP7/8/9-DEF COMP CONTRIB 2.013.45 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,013.45 2 01:.45 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY 0014431-45403-- 8463 ANIMAL CONTRL SVCS -MAY 99 5.:361.92 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL INE VENDOR 5,361.92 5.361.92 JACKS LOCK & KEY 0014090-42200-- 27148 PROF -SVCS -CM DEFT. 45.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 45.00 45.00 JOE A GONSALVES `; SON 0014010-44000-- 7197 SVCS-LEGISTV-MAY ',000.00 TOTAL PREPAIDSPROF .00TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR ,000.00 ;1. 000,00 JOHN REVES 001-347E0-- 0 638 RECREA T IO+i REFUNDr 55. 0 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 55 55 00 .1)0 55.00 JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION 0014 411-454:5-- MAF -99 REVIEW PROCESSING -MARCH 27.00MAR-99 MAR-FRKQ ACTIVITY .3:30.04 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .!J!1 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ,57.04 357.04 JULIE JORDAN 001-:34780-- REFUND 39.00 TOTAL FREFPREPAIDSRECREATIMI TOTAL VOUCHERS ,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 39.0!) .'`.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 10 DUE THRU: 05104/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT—ACCT—PROJECT—ACCT PO # INVOIC" DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK. K&V BLUEPRINT 0014090-42200-- 63295 LINEAR FTG CHCS—XEROX 84.66 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS F 64.V� TOTAL DUE VENDOR 84.66 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 0015310-41200-- 640336 PARKS SUPPLIES 140.73 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 140.73 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 140.73 GRACE KD 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 42.50 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 4.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 42.50 AMY ICUO Orli-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 59.O0 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 59.00, TOTAL DUE VENDOR 59.00 CATHERINE LANGSTON REFUND — PRKG CITATION 10.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •Dig TOTAL VOUCHERS 10.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 10.00 LARIBA ISLAMIC BANKING C101,40:110-42325-- MTG — MAY P — ANSARI 50.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS t�0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 JAE SOD LEE Gini -347,0-- RECREATION REFUND 11.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 11.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 11.00 LEWTS ENGRAVING INC 014090-42113-- 7905 3'1.766 ENVGRVG SVCS—SHERIFF DEPT 17.32 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 17.32 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 17.3 LIEBERT. CASSISDY & FRIERSON 0014030-42:-3,—' LAW CONF-6iI0-11 HARAKSIN 425.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .DO TOTAL VOUCHERS 425.06 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 425.1?G RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 11 DUE THRU: 05104/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK SCOTT LIN 0015553-44100-- T&T COMM.MTG-4/2/99 40.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 _._ TOTAL DUE VENI+OR 40.00 4:+. C0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY - MTA 1125553-45r.,�-- 1125553-45535-- 8661 499046 MTAPASSES - APRIL 1990 748.80 8661 4990462 CITY SUBSIDY - APRIL 1999 412.20 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,161.00 1,161,00 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 00+15510-45507-- 4=''I 190-j +)0+15;10-45507-- ROUTINE/EXTRAORD MAINT 557.55 x'484 . - 13`26 ROUTINE MAINT-MARCH 92 617.84 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.225.39 1,225.39 LFA INC 0505115-464<<+-13898-45420 8445 PROF.SVCS-CIVC CTR DSGN 10,322,62 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 10,322.60 10,388.6d- 0,382.52ANN ANNLUNGU 0015010-42:330-- PLNRS CONF-MEAL PER DIEM TOTAL PREPAIDS 326.25 05/04/1999 35390 TOTAL VOUCHERS 316.22 5 TOTAL DUE VENDOR , 00 316.25 LYNDA BURGESS 0014040-42,1130- REIMB-LCCA CONF-4/21-23 317.44 TOTAL PPEPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 317.44 317.44 LYNDE-ORDWAY 0014+90-41200-- 0014090-41200-- 2601 SUPPLIES - SHRED BAGS 5:1.71 ;: 66'' SUPPLIES - SHRED BAGS 49.72 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 00 .103.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 103,43 MAINTEX 0015314-412200-- 8533. 3Ni7+ ;1a-; MAINT SUPPLIES -HERITAGE 44.32 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .0U O TDTAL DUE VENDOR 44. 44.-� RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 12 DUE THRID: 05/04/1999 FUNIVSECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT # IWOI IM�OICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK MANAGED BY DESIGN 0015310-46250-- 8512 29602 VEHICLE MNGMT SOFTWARE 308.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS y_ 30,8 00, TOTAL DUE VENDOR 302A MONTEREY MARRIOTT 0014095-42330-- CAPIO CONF-4/28-30-NELSON 305.80 05/04/1:..999 393 .�53'�3 TOTAL PREPAIDS 305.80 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 305.80 JANET MCENROE 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 160.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 160.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 160.00 MCKENNA DODGE 0015210-46100-- 8621 VEHICLE EQUIP -CODE ENFORC 952.60 05/04/1999 35394 TOTAL PREPAIDS 952.60 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 952.60 JANICE MEKETARIAN 001-34?30-- RECREATION REFUND4'; d, 00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 49.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 49.00 METPOLINK 11:'5553-4553`-- 1;`5553-4«r, 8659 1089;6_ METROLINK PASSES - APRIL 27,814.40 ,,.,. �_,-, _:__ 859 108983 TRANSIT SUBSIDY - APRIL 6.953.60 TOTAL PREPAIDS 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 34 768.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 34,768.00 ROLAND MORRIS 0015553-44100-- T&T COMM.MTG-4/3/99 40.(x) TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40.00 TOTAL IUE VENDOR 40.00 ELSA MUELLER: OC i -:34730-- 49574 REFUND FOR PALM SPRINGS 37,00 TIAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS '37.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 37,40 NELSDNICS 0015350-42:53-- SOUND SYSTM-ANNV CELEB 500.00 05/'04/1999 35371 TNAL c:�:— �I�r. O TO*i AL VOUCHERS. RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 13 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE PREPAID DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK NEKTEL 0014440-42130-- 7879 1417045 2 WAY RADIO SVCS -APR 216.86 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 216.86 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 216.86 NATALIE L NGUYEN 001-34760-- REFUND 205.00 TOTAL PREPAIDSRECREATION � TOTAL VOUCHERS 205.00 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 205. 00 KATHLEEN NOLAN 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 70.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00TOTAL VOUCHERS 70.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 70.00 O'ROURKE ENGINEERING 2505510-46412-14799-46412 8091 MU10981/2 SCHL/TRFC IMPV. STDY TOTAL PREPAIDS 863.00 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 863.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 863.00 OFFICE DEPOT 0014030-41200-- 00140 30-41200-- 7656/OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY MANAGER ^� 2_35.4,, 0014090-41 7666/OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY MANAGER 82.48 00-- 4014090-41200-- 7,,bc,/OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY MANAGER 139.15 766h/OPEN SUPPLIES - GENERAL 8171,88 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 540.96 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 540.96 CRANGE COMMERICAL CREDIT 00140'0-46250-- 8605 x'1221 MISC.EOUIP-CODE ENFORCEMT 989,40 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 989.40 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 989.40 PACIFIC TIME RECORDER ()014050-42200-- 15289 MAINT-TIME CLOCK: FOR FINC 105.39 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 105.39 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 105.39 MYUNG PARK 001-34780-- REFUND 80.00 TOTAL PREPAIDSRECREATION .04 TOTAL VOUCHERS 80.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 80.00 RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 14 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREFAIQ 1 AMOJNT DATE CHECK PAYROLL TRANSFER 001-10200-- 1050074 PAYROLL TRANSFER-PP8 60,600.00 05/04/1999 PPE, TOTAL PREPAIDS 60 600.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 60,600.00 BOB PAYTON 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 12.01) TOTAL PREPAID5 . 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 12 12.00 PERS RETIREMENT FUND 001-21109-- 001-21109-- PPS kETIRE CONTRIB-EE 4,110.95 05/04111999 ac -3917 001-21109-- PF'8 RETIRE CONTRIB-ER 3 616.44 0`/O4/1999 3539 OOi-2110'9-- PP8 MILITARY BUY BACK: oo� 509.69 05/04/1: 35=;95 �, ,_; PPS SURVIVOR BENEFIT 31.62 05/04/ 1999 353395 TOTAL PREPAIDS 8,268.70 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 8.268.70 PITNEY BOWES INC 0014091)-42130-- 7657 3.16188-AP99 PSTG EQUIP RENT - APF: 369,90 TOTAL PREPAIDS UU TOTAL VOUCHERS 369.90 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 369.90 PAUL PLESE 001-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 10.00 TOTAL PREPAID5 .0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 0 10.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 10.00 POMONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 0014010-42325-- 0014010-42325-- MTG 5/4 -MAYOR CHANG 20.00 05/04/1999 35384 0014030-42325-- MTG-4/16-MPT O'CONNOR 20.00 05/04/1999 35377 MTG-4/16-CM DESTEFANO 20.00 05/04/1999 35377 TOTAL PREF'AIGS 60.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00TOTAL DUE VENDOR 60,00 POMONA JUDICIAL DISTRICT 001-M'330-- FEB -99 FEB-PAW:ING ACTIVITY 1,065.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,06.5.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,065.00 POMONA VALLEY PIPE & SUPPLY CORP (N)1531.3-42210-- 21559 MISC SUPPLIES -HERITAGE PK 53.6? PREPAIDS ,TOTAL TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 53.69 53.69 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:7 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 15 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHER, PONIES FOR PARTIES 0015350-42353-- 8675 PONY RIDE-ANNV CELEB-4/18 525.00 05/04/1999 3538; TOTAL PREPAIDS 525.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS ,._ .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 525.00 PRECISION SOUND 0014090-46240-- 8658 018979 MISC.EOUIP-CODE ENF VHCLE 161.59 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 161.59 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 161.59 PROMO GRAPHICS 0014095-41400-- 6062 10TH ANNIVERSARY T-SHIRTS 651.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 651,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 651.00 R & D BLUEPRINT 0015210-42110-- 8096 38194 COPY SVGS 24.51 00i5210-42110--8096 41560 COPY SVCS 70.99 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 95.51 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 95.51 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 0014090-42225-- 10027374 SUPPLIES-CIC SE55IDN 4/15 7.48 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 7.48 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7.4$ REINBERGER PRINTWERKS INC 0014090-42110-- 7499A 9591 PRINTING SVCS-BUS.CARDS 40.95 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40.95 REINBERGER PRINTWERYS INC 0014090-42110-- 7804 9591 SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES 112.42 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 172.42 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 172.42 REMEDY 0015210-44000-- 8168 10152 TEMP.SVCS-ADMIN SCRTARY 142.89 0015210-44000-- 8326 101521 TEMP.SVCS-ADMIN SECRETARY 291.06 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 433.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 433.95 CITY OF DIAMOND DAR RUN DATE 04(29(1999 15:55: J VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE ib DUE THRU! 05/04/1999 PREPAID C FUND(SECT-ACCT-PROJErT-ACCT PO # INVOIC' DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK: RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 0411517/9/20 FEB -LEGAL SVCS 3,012.84 00140-44020-- 200- "513 04116 FEB LEGAL SVCS -CABLE 332.50 0014020-44.021--2 TOTAL PREPAIDS __ .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS �,` 335 .34 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -3,335.34 RIO HONDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRCT COURSE -4/30 FLORES/L SMTH 73.00 05/04/1999 353c",i 0qi�: 0-42330- TOTAL PREPAIDS 73'00 TOTAL VOUCHERS '00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 73.00 MARSHA.ROA RE1MB-ANNIVERSARY EXPENSE 755.83' 0015350-4235_-- TOTAL PREPAIDS 'q0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 75.V3 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 75.83 ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES 8649 INS.PREM-ANNV CELEB 4/18 6TA 707.95 0015'250-42353-- TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 707.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 707'575 SAN DIMAS GRAIN� HAY BALES-ANNV CELEB-4/18 216.00 05/04/1999 35386 (..;15350-42:53-- 36 1 TOTAL PREPAIDS 216.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS '00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 216.00 SAN FRANCISCO HILTON HOTEL CONT 6/10-11-HARAK.5IN 385.50 Ocii4��)-42_'•i�-- TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 3K5.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 355.50 TIM SHIELDSn RECREATION REFUND 55.00 q�;1 -3478 i --TOTAL PREFAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 55'00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 55.00 SIGN DEPOT $615 BANNEF'.S-WINE SOIREE 1,736.03 0ic:i=3,55-42115-- " 19155 BANNERS -ANNIVERSARY JERSARY CELEB %11.09 0015350-42:353-- - TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,947.12 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,947''` CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/19/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 17 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK. SMART & FINAL 0015350-45310-- 7522 189�?52/82 SUPPLIES -SUPPLIES -PARKS 501.x6 1255215-41200-- 7522 289205 SUPPLIES -SENIORS 66.70 TOTAL PREPAIDS t .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 568.56 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 568.56 SO CALIFORNIA BINDERY & MAILING 0014095-42121-- 7500 242Ac8 MAIL PROCSSNG SVCS-LNTRMN 352.52 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 352.52 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 352.52 SOFT -TRAIN 0014095-42340-- 8598 105900 PROF SVCS-CMFTR TRNG 1,000.00; TOTAL PREPAIDS .(n) TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,000.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1,000.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1415541-42126-- ELECT SVCS-DIST #41 166.17 OBJ 1551 l-42126-- ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 282.66 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 448.83 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 448.83 SPORT PINS INTERNATIONAL 247: 40285 l,TH ANNIVERSARY PINS 9400.67 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 940.67 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 940.67 STEVEN ENTERPRISES iis14090-41200-- 8024 60738 COMPTUTER SUPPLS 107.72 TOTAL PREF'AIDS . 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 107.72 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 107.72 SUBWAY 001409 0-4232-- LANTERMAt1 TAR.. FORCE -4119 3".90 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS :9.90 TOTAL DUE VENDOR; SWARTWOOD AMUSEMENT COMPAI4Y !�p15:5ii-4i JC-- VJiV CARNIVAL RIDES-ANNV CELEB 1,050.00 05/04/1999 35372 TOTAL PREPAIDS 7.050.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7,050.00 WANDA !ANAKA F;EIME-EASTER HU"dT SUPPLS 375.42 05/04/199` "'76 TOTAL PRE'r't;IL'S 375.4' STEVEN TYE 0015210-423215-- MMB-PLNNERS MTG-3/24-26 CITY OF DIAMOND BAF: RUN DATE: 04/19/1999 15:55:27 PREPAIDS 37.00 VOUCHER'REGISTER VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION MAE TANG 74.00 POSTAGE-SUMMR NEWSLETTER .00 001-34720-- PREPAIDS RECREATION REFUND VOUCHERS 274.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS 274.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS OSJi EOUIPMT-LANTERMAN MTG4/19 TOTAL DUE VENDOR TORRANCE BAKERY C .30 TOTAL VOUCHERS 00153RIO-42'353-- 2517 DUE VENDOR CAKE -ANNIVERSARY CELEB 262.59 TOTAL PREPAIDS STATEBUDGET BRFNG-HERRERA 2.500.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL TOTAL DUE VENDOR TOWNE CENTRE TRAVEL DUE VENDOR VAN WINKLE AND AFFILIATES .00 0015210-42330-- 0014095-44000-- cb7,-: J7 AIRFARE PLNNG CONF-LUNGU 0014040-42330-- 8670 PREPAIDS AIRFARE-CCLK CONF-4/21-23 TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL PREPAIDS 1,126.00 05/04/1999 TOTAL VOUCHERS .` 0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. 0015350-42353;-- 3.^_,69 73503 TRFC SUPPLS-ANNV CELEB TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR STEVEN TYE 0015210-423215-- MMB-PLNNERS MTG-3/24-26 TOTAL PREPAIDS 37.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR U.S. POSTMASTER 74.00 05/04/1991 0014095-42120-- 74.00 POSTAGE-SUMMR NEWSLETTER .00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 274.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS 274.00 0014090-42:130-- OSJi EOUIPMT-LANTERMAN MTG4/19 TOTAL PREPAIDS C .30 TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR VALLEJO'S 262.59 0014010-423.30-- 262.59 STATEBUDGET BRFNG-HERRERA 2.500.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,500.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR VAN WINKLE AND AFFILIATES .00 0014095-44000-- cb7,-: J7 VIDEOGRAPHY SVCS-PANTERA TuTAL PREPAIDS 15.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS PAGE: 12 PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK 37.00 ,0n 37.00 ^7.00 74.00 05/04/1991 35373 74.00 .00 74.00 212.12 05/04/1999 35320 274.00 212.1 274.00 426.12 33.30 .00 C .30 ,OM 261.59 .00 262.59 262.59 2.500.00 .00 ,500.00 2,500.00 427.59 .00 427.59 4'7.59 15.00 05/04/1999 35325 15.00 .00 15.00 1,126.00 05/04/1999 350396 1.1$6,t�f .` 0 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 19 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK VANTAGE POINT PRODUCTIONS 0014090-41200-- 8034 1864 VIDEO SVCS-LNTRMN MTO 4/8 49.58 TOTAL PREPAIDS .(m TOTAL VOUCHERS 49.58 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 49.58 ARUN VIRGINKAP. 0015553-44100-- T&T COMM,MTG-4/8/99 40,00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40.00 WARREN SIECKE 001-23010-- 4251 PROF.SVCS - FPL 98-057 74.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 74.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 74.00 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 0015558-45509-- 8485 15217 TREE MAINT-SVCS FOR 3/31 2,245.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,245.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2,245.00 WESTERN GAMING 1255215-41200-- 8559 SUPPLIES - SENIOR BINGO 126.61 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 126.61 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 126.61 WESTIN SEATTLE 0015210-422330--. PLNNG CONF-4123-28 LUNGU 895.90 05/04/1999 35379 TOTAL PREPAIDS 895.90 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 895.90 THE WORE; STATION LLC 001550-42?53-- 8616 2061 POSTERS-ANNV CELEB 61.42 0015350-4235-- :616 2048 FLYERS-ANNV CELEB 194.85 (x)14090-42110-- 8634 206Y COPIES-LANTERMAN TAS,. FRC 1,299.81 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,556.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.556.08 PAUL WRIGHT 0014090-44000-- 7584 AUDIOIVISUAL SVCS -APRIL 700.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 700.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 700.00 REPORT TOTAL PREPAIDS 84,210.79 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS 359.449.10 REPORT TOTAL 443,659.89 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15!55:27 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 20 DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK XEROX CORPORATION 0014090-42100-- 7474 067790100 COPY CHARGES -MARCH 1,663.94 0014090-42200-- 7474 067790100 MARCH MAINT SVCS-kEROX 327.25 0014090-41200-- 8622 168429965 COPIER SUPPLIES 148.30 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 2,139.49 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2.139.49 XPEDX 0014090-41200-- 0571 SUPPLIES -COPY PAPER 497.05 0014090-41200-- 8545 SUPPLS-COPY PAPER 497.95 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 995.90 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 995.90 HIROKO YOSHIMURA O01-34780-- RECREATION REFUND 56.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 56.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 56.00 REPORT TOTAL PREPAIDS 84,210.79 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS 359.449.10 REPORT TOTAL 443,659.89 GITY OF UTAMONU BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: May 4,1999 ,,��YY1� REPORT DATE: April 21,1999 FROM: Linda G. MagnusorP-Finance Director TITLE: Treasurer's Report — March 31, 1999 SUMMARY: Submitted for the City Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of March 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) _ Ordinance(s) _ Other: _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? _ Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NIA _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: RE EWED BY: �qwl,t1 � / Terrence L. Belanger O,4� City Manager DEPARTMENT HEAD: Linda G. Magnus Finance Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: May 4,1999 AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - March 31, 1999 ISSUE STATEMENT: Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the March 1999, Treasurer's Statement FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Submitted for the Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of March 1999. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from investments. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson TMCA3UKCK"0 MUNTr1LT GA317 31ATGmG11T March 31, 1999 TOTAL CASH $24,304,894.83 Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. All funds are available for withdrawal within 24 hours. Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed under the City's formally adopted investment policy. As a secondary investment option, the City continues to maintain the US Treasury Sweep Account with Wells Fargo. Any excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis from the City's bank accounts and are invested overnight into an investment pool of US Treasury Notes. Interest is credited to the City's bank account on a monthly basis. L.A.I. F - Effective Yield for February 1999 5.210% Money Market -Effective Yield for February 1999 3.620% All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. The ove summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's esti ted expenditures. Terrence L. Belanger, Treasurer' BECsMIHING TRMFERS ENDING d3ALAN RIEG$�1$.... ..!]18HttRSdNEI+tTs IN t!!1 BALANCi: GENERAL FUND $11,987,798.34 $1,033,735.48 $831,009.61 $12,190,524.21 LIBRARY SERVICES FUND 109,414.68 569.44 108,845.24 COMMUNITY ORG SUPPORT FD 9,914.54 9,914.54 GAS TAX FUND 3,036,630.92 208,876.50 3,245,507.42 TRANSIT TX(PROP A) FD 1,846,429.32 99,528.90 61,017.46 1,884,940.76 TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD 2,097,830.88 52,005.20 2,149,836.08 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD 192,367.10 4,484.71 187,882.39 AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD 152,650.61 14,210.67 347.33 166,513.95 TRAILS & BIKEWAYS FD (SB 821) 30,065.79 30,065.79 PARK FEES FUND 174,876.21 174,876.21 S PARKS GRANT (PRP A) FD (467,695.64) 467,697.00 1.36 FACILITIES & PARK DEVEL. FD 1,395,896.18 1,395,896.18 COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD (141,162.83) 40,005.00 5,747.78 (106,905.61) CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY FD 342,736.32 1,622.48 341,113.84 NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD 318,206.59 318,206.59 LANDSCAPE DIST X38 FD 503,055.14 4,436.57 498,618.57 LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD 160,850.33 4,873.79 155,976.54 LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD 299,808.87 3,017.16 296,791.71 GRAND AV CONST FUND 139,130.78 139,130.78 CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD 132,199.30 107,500.00 61,278.23 178,421.07 SELF INSURANCE FUND 938 719.21 18.00 938,737.21 TOTALS 23,2592722.84 $21023,576.75TO8,404.58 $0.00 24,304,894.83 SUMMARY OF CASH: DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT $273,647.29 PAYROLL ACCOUNT 233.31 CHANGE FUND 250.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00 TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS $274,630.60 INVESTMENTS: US TREASURY Money Market Acct. $1,522,053.90 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 22,508,210.33 TOTAL INVESTMENTS $24,030,264.23 TOTAL CASH $24,304,894.83 Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. All funds are available for withdrawal within 24 hours. Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed under the City's formally adopted investment policy. As a secondary investment option, the City continues to maintain the US Treasury Sweep Account with Wells Fargo. Any excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis from the City's bank accounts and are invested overnight into an investment pool of US Treasury Notes. Interest is credited to the City's bank account on a monthly basis. L.A.I. F - Effective Yield for February 1999 5.210% Money Market -Effective Yield for February 1999 3.620% All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. The ove summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's esti ted expenditures. Terrence L. Belanger, Treasurer' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 28, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Notice of Completion for Traffic Signals Installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue and Quail Summit Drive. SUMMARY: The City Council on June 16 1998, awarded a contract in the amount of $159,700.00 to Pro Tech Engineering Corporation with a contingency of $16,000.00 for traffic signals installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue and Quail Summit Drive for a total authorization amount of $175,700.00. On December 1, 1998, the City Council approved a change in the scope of work in the amount of $10,874.00 resulting in a total authorization amount of $186,574.00. In accordance with the Final Account Summary, an amount of $14,440.00 will be deducted accordingly from the 10% retention. The construction contract amount,before the deduction, is $185,984.38. The final construction contract amount will be $171,554.38. Due to various issues and the late completion of the project, a deduction of $14,440.00 from the contract amount is requested. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to deduct $14,440.00 from the contract amount, accept the work performed by Pro Tech Engineering Corporation, authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release $4,159.44 of the retention amount. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (an f& in cay ctwk,s office) _ Ordinances(s) X Other: (Notice of Completion) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A —Yes —No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A —Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: 7M; l Terrence L. Belang J s DeStefano DKid G. Liu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. _ MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for Traffic Signals Installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue and Quail Summit Drive ISSUE STATEMENT: File and submit for recordation a Notice of Completion for traffic signals installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue and Quail Summit Drive. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to deduct $14,440.00 from the contract amount, accept the work performed by Pro Tech Engineering Corporation, authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion and release $4,159.44 of the retention amount. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: This process of filing Notice of Completion has no financial impact on the City's 1998-1999 budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City Council, at their regular meeting of June 16, 1998, awarded the contract for the installation of traffic signals on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Monetefino Avenue and Quail Summit Drive to Pro Tech Engineering Corporation, the lowest responsible bidder. The awarded contract amount was $159,700.00 with a contingency amount of $16,000.00 for a total authorization of $175,700.00. On December 1, 1998, with the opportunity to enhance the pedestrian circulation at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Montefino Avenue, the City Council approved a change in the scope of work in the amount of $10,874.00. With the authorized contingency and change in scope of work, staff has approved change orders in the amount of $26,294.38 and extended the contract to February 4, 1999. Due to complicated conditions in the field, some of the contractor's construction methods and the untimely delivery of equipment, this project was not completed until March 3, 1999. Stats met with Mr. Mike Niknafs of Pro Tech Engineering Corporation on March 19, 1999 to express our desire to resolve all the outstanding issues (see Attachment "A"). However, as of April 27, 1999, we have yet to receive any additional information * from the contractor. At this time, it is staff s recommendation that we finalize the project with the filing of the Notice of Completion. Furthermore, in accordance with our Final Account Summary, an amount of $14,440.00 will be deducted accordingly from the 10% retention. The construction contract amount, before the deduction, is $185,994.38. The final contract amount will be $171,554.38. Prepared By: David G. Liu Word\Sharon\CityCouncilReport\DBBi\Moatefino\Quail * On April 28, 1999, Pro Tech Engineering Corp. faxed the attached letters (Attachment `B") to staff. Upon reviewing these letters, both consultant and staff did not find any new information to change staffs recommendations as presented. :; rn rn 0 N co N r W m Z U uiw CLJ OCZ U U. LL c o 0) N r 0 0 0 0 O O 01 L) D N O O O O Off t) O mt Oco O Li Cl It 0 0c W v Cv1 OvD v M v v w 0 O 0 0 0 000000 O ti 00000 t� a CD N N O I— I— Le Q cu !^c rn O c O v' E � "= o i --c9 `c 06o �' a) cc o ��E o��eEvaci L a 0 mi L) E 0) LL a IM V O= �� r4) v O Q p N 7 C Ncli E (n N N d g ch cc 3 Z N «+ o u Z d N >+m ca c c ''D O O O &V aEin°5acn 10 �E CO J o cc m° m= o c a o & N t5 •c N 7 i C y C> Co C C O o�E��c°�voaD0 - S` a `o c 'D is — m (D O C U O U U w C 0 co M> M J 3 a rn •` N N N, 7 0 N N j N O C 0 LL •O a L c0SM O > O 'D >"D W 0) Q N Q Q Q W �O H Z Z W fA O � J wN M et to 40 !- 00 Qi N9 Z H d O W J Q Z Pro Tech £n iueel in Gar 39.4.4 E. La Palma Ave FAX To: Cg?Y OF DL4MOND BAR IFT, bat.." ryIn T.TH -- "LIC WORK TWIPT. Phone- (9W9)-8 W24U9 Fa. pholln- - 49051) M13117 CC: MR_ yalm MITTT? .�TT,�II,�/rE,t✓7 � �, Suit 117,. Anaheim, -CA 92807 inCludictg �v.'er meet: 3 From: PRO TICH ENGTNF.ERING UORP. 1�idKt:. Tiii4?ihT?5 Fax (71s)Z$I-GR29 IMMAIUM- CT Kreent ft For your m -few n R"*r ks" r] Plrbse Cx+nlnlcnt i)rar David -i?nrinced yrm find a cmw Qftwo lattcrs lions aur supplier for 3bov4 reference proje%A wiQl All J)rnhlnm-t, etlrrectlons. and their reesutls rut QJay of tilt Ujaledal wll lc.11 wA% rRtnlptcfciy chit Qf our control and VArtialiv due to Qie raulc dcsiy a and spc opdic'►tioa whloh Wovipod to us at the, 6t2g1rW UwvUdkt% As you awaro the have tried our bebt to "xipfete tltn ptejert ill 1 i mely manner wi"t)1 all Swett problems froth manufacturer with availabilitY of tong load materials And aU ehaaRes vAdch n°as made On drewiuG W' -W rcrr the pmbleius. mould ioti.te4uXmndInir;..n-nt infotttiatl04-danot hesitate. to. call tua4L(71.4) R(U -5220. Thank you lot: all your-Padent Mike Niknaffb Precident nPR /—iv,gq 15: L11 1 M I tPSECT I OM DF—W. CGRP. SAJ 973 ?M7 P-01/01 0 InterseMon Development C V 9 P O N A T 1 U H A Display rochnologlec Inc. CvrnPany April 27, 1009 Mike NiknAfs Pro -tech Engineering Corporation 3855 F. I A Palma Ave.. Suite #127 Anaheim, GA. 92807 RE! PON 187531 IDC 5045077 Mike, I am sorry that I have taken so long to write this letter. I know that you have nelplele i this to finish your project with the city. The following is a cronological listing of this order with IDC. 5-26-98 Bid job to contractors. 9-1-98 Purchase Order dated 9-21-98 Purchase Order received. 9.22-98 Purchase Order in system with a due date of 11 16-98, 12-1-98 Shipped Controllers / Cabinets. 1-13-99 Controllers returned for repair ( short power nutsgo test failuro). 1-1�1-99 Shipped signals. 1-1 B-99 Repaired Contrulldrs returned to test lab. 2-1-99 Shipped frameworks for signals and ped heads than were shipped Incorrectly. 2-16-99 Shipped 4094 ped heads to replace incorrect heads originally shipped. 2-19.99 Shipped (3) arrow lenses to replace ball lenses incorrectly shipped. Turn On controllers 1 cabinets ( add loadswitch at city request for Montefino). 3-9 99 Shipped (2) ped framdworks that were shorted on original signal shipment (1-14-99). Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (562) 923- 9600 oxt. 144. Thank Youl 1 sin1ce�re Mark Dillard Chief Estimator [)etlwC:A r 3ynlan�.F - lutJ�t:ad . ixwd"dx - q'Ad State f)og ; *& - Mullizoniaa - Traeonex - MVOr3 Cu*tor" Products - WinkotYsaUe Tra"IC� r''..v�nrafw I(�erigrrarfsrs 930n F. Halt Road - Dnwney. CA 90241-5309 • USA Tet: (502) 823-9600. (000) 733-7872 - Fax: (562) 023-1666 www. ido-rraffip.00m ?V4ir{e'" WI•otesalr_ Electric Co, 1510 U. Hit0hoy 6t. silMP Ana, GA 92706 • (714) 541 22b3 • FOX (714) 841-6966 Mike Niknafs Protech engineering 3855 E_ La Pelma Ave Anahoim CA. 92806 RE, Diamond Bar I recelved your order for the poles on 9-1-96. The poles have a ten to twelve week lead time. The poles were delayed for two masons: 1) Ameron's factory experienced a flood that shut down all their manufanhiring. This flood forced all their shipments back an additional week. 2) Ameron's factory closed down over the Christmas and new years holiday. This added two weeks to the original lead tlmen- Should you have any questions, please give me a call at (714) 541-2253. Thank You, r i Ryan Thibault Walters Wholesale Electric TOO In XVI 36:ST 66`9Z!Yo RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE, STE. 100 DIAMOND BAR CA 91765-4177 ATTENTION: CITY CLERK NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is the owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City dDiamond Bar 3. The full address of the owner is 21660 East Copley Drive. Suite 100 Diamond Bar. CA 91765 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. (If other than fee, strike "In fee" and insert, for example, "purchaser under ocabad of purchase." or "lessee") 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on March 3. 1999 . The work done was: Traffic Signals Installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefmo Avenue and Ouag Summit Drive 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvemak was Pro Tech Enrineerinr Corporation June 16.1998 (1fno 000tractor far work of improvanear m a whole, iasal "none") (Dab of Conirset) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows Traffic Signals Installation on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue and Ouail Summit Drive 9. The street address of said property is (If no area address has been officially assigned, insert "none") CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Dated: Vai6c Um for Individad Owner Signature of owner w mrporab offices of owner n mod in pwayraph 2 or his agar VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the Deputy Director of Public Works the declarant of the foregoing Cresid nt or, Maoaga or, "A paha or, "Owner Of", eta) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contests thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 19 _, at Diamond Bar California. (Dab of signumre) (City what signed) (Personal sig mume of the indivi3W who is swearing that the oebads of the notice of completion are true) sllf-vim l�-r � G � Pro Tech Engineerin Comp 3855,E. La Palma Ave.. Suite 177 `` Anaheim, CA 92807 E? Phone (714) 801 _S220.E [-; :.1• "' FAC (714)281-6829 '' 3 1999 CITv (c p DATE: 4/30/99 c1�;iw City of Diamond Bar ATT avid Liu TO: FROM: - Mike Niknafs DEPTH Public Works _ Traffic Signa] @ Diamond Bar B1vdLMontefino/Quai.l Summit. SUBJECT:_ _-_ 3 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET • April 30, 1999 Devic -G_ Liu Public works Deparurtent 21669E.Eepley IIr+vs, Seize 190 Diatnond Bar, CA 91765-4177 Subject- : TRAFFIC SiGNPA s Oi.1.Lx AxdfQw, BAR BO> A.FwARD AT QUAIL SI MMIT DRIVE AND MONTEFINO AVENUE Dcar Mr. Uu We reouw;c cyyu t. IcL= daAcd_A4wiL 20,.1999 oa April 29, 1999 via far. Respond to yorm letter %&e have_fhx you a copy of letter from our suppliers as soon as it A&x54LUaiIaWC so us Am April -27, 19W. The content of this letteasclearly slala swLic hwhan w'Ct Q_nrAQWAth­ and_vsl4c n iLWAS shipped to us, plus all problems that we encouttler to i114", Rtcrclassc orders abich utas com[pi tely beymW our control. Ttic-Penuanext address ntlmbcrSff]LtnoLseruil,---pecioctnlc beminUnitwi f kv da;,s jler, wee, up, otx Iay 4, l9 9. Respond to your Final Account Summary Dedurtix-ms ITEM- its : Atldcd-91 L.E. of Cenduit_andLr. cd canduit W3 V,,5.00). Rase on the verbal agreement we made inks 1998 rltese uld ht m deductionercredit on this item. You hadntadatheL Ar Oxine to change soiree ooa uit x nc a, -d pal�t Imal nu Yousubuulted to us tIw_ye►v (4esign . We reviewed the nese design and had agreed to cova ract it.mithoutany.addi•ianal chargcs4arrredits. ITrM #7 ' EigtdeeL,_w.urlcutt/ daysof i .iq-, rtatrrtnames a aL S500.00 per- day a9,000.00) The delaved of the completion of Ute project was beyond our control. The-maurials %Nvm Ordered on the timely manner. Howevorthc taanufacrurerwas.lataitt_11ip-,t,wrnont orilie-umlenal Also_lbe_wgual C ila Der_dtd not pass the test due to manufacturer fault. It was shipped bar' _w1he ntan„rarnlre for repair It tack a month to receive the control tet=s from tate test tab. The other cause of thatislay w -as dee to signal-fr;attae atad-ped head that were shipped incefE tt:tl} 1'lv-y were: send back to the manufucturcr, and it took over two weeks for them to ship back to us the correct signal frame and ped heads. The Ourri c rasoLdel2y was due to.Microwal Dr eeln*Usw;hiLh_ i dc3vi;ucdinr-___r _r Aly for this application. Because it would not detect the presence of vehicles. It took city oder riro weeks to present us the ne%v equipment that could ft[nction accordingly. Au.:ordiug STAWnARD 5PECU9W.A-PLQNS FORFUEu W WORKS CONSTRUCTION, DELAYS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME. This aielr¢1car1 sttitcd t)taE uwdcf u u evswlsbeye the oenirol of the Contme1w, such delays %%ill entitle the Contractor to an extension of time. According to section 6.6.3 such unforeseeat events may include but not limited• A-1MABILrrY TO OBTAI)J- M!4TERdAd-S, EQT-1lPJv Ew— AND/OR F.XTAA WORK. ITEM #8 : 136.5 HOURS ADDITIONAL INSPECTION DUE TO CON TRACTOR ACTIONS (58,190-M) Based or►~ stat¢t WM tuff 11'r:M #>Zihe we Wmn*W-n94be charged with any add"toaal-inspection fcc. ITEM #9: 640 S.F. OF PAVEMENT REPAIR DUE TO WATER DAMAGE-. The damage was fully repaifed by Walnut Valley Water Department's l ontsacler, L"o" B"tlters cb- It the present of the City Inspector. As of today there has not been any sign of default with the repair_ We have paid in full fof this dawage arm we should -flet -be cluwseid- again bv- Qw of niamond Bar. In Stlmmary we would like to remind you that we have completed ll» sprpjcctprofcssionngy, econotuically, and in tnncly�-reaattcnto tAcbcst o€otts ability. Wchavc 6cta:vc�cpamiWynad-oaoperatfve throughm t this prryocL We do not appreciate to be put m this position unexpectedly at the end of theproject, and have only a day to reply. Please contact us at-'X'XM-W30- 71.7 if -you hW o any men qWstions- Sincerely -e-Niknafs Presiftm. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR _ AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. �. 7 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 26, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." SUMMARY: The City Council awarded the engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers Street and Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with L.A. County Department of Public Works to approve the storm drain and NPDES requirements. At this time DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvement Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification x Resolution(s) x Bid Specification: on file at City Clerk's _ Ordinances(s) office. _ Agreement(s) _ Other: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: x Yes _ No Majority N/A _ Yes _ No N/A _ Yes _ No N/A _ Yes _ No Terrence L. Bel er JatWes DeStefan4avid 4GLidu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 AGENDA NO. _ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L.Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." ISSUE STATEMENT The City desires to approve the plans and specifications in order to advertise for bids for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." FINANCIAL SUMMARY The total allocated project budget is $200,000.00 of Gas Tax Fund. The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $185,000.00. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Ambushers Street, between Woodhill Circle and 20914 Ambushers Street, has been experiencing a constant flow of nuisance -water dishcarge running down the street gutters to the storm drain catch basins near the bottom of the street, accumulating and facilitating the growth of algae and scum. Converse Consultants conducted the geotechnical investigation which evaluated the existing underground infiltration and seepage conditions for the project areas and recommended remediation measures to mitigate distress conditions. The improvement design incorporates additional catch basins to be constructed uphill on Ambushers Street to intercept the nuisance water, extend the storm drain section. The design also includes areas that are highly distressed to be overlayed and remainder project areas to be slurry - sealed. This would relieve the homeowners along the lower sections of Ambushers Street. The City Council awarded the engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers Street and Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with L.A. County Department of Public Works to approve the storm drain and NPDES requirements. At this time DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. Plans and specifications for the project have been prepared. Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor includes: ➢ Schedule to be submitted at least 10 calendar days before start of work; ➢ Traffic control plans; ➢ Notification to residents, utility owners and other public agencies; ➢ Completion of all work within 30 calendar days; and ➢ Liquidated damages of $500/day for non-performance. Tentative schedule for the project is as follows: Approval of Plans and Specifications May 4, 1999 Notice to Bidders May 10, 1999 Bid Opening June 1, 1999 Award of Construction Contract June 15, 1999 Notice to Proceed June 28, 1999 End of Construction July 28, 1999 Prepared by: David G. Liu /Rose E. Manela 2 RESOLUTION NO. 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMBUSHERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared plans and specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented to the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be in the form and content as approved by the City Attorney and a copy of this Resolution shall be contained in each specification package for the work: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock a.m. on the 1st day of June, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Diamond Bar, California, marked, "Ambushers Street Drainage Improvements Project." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate; or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five; or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally; or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this Contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least 10 percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, or certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and material bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carnes compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as a Class A contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Diamond Bar. The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar, California. Copies of the specifications will be furnished upon application and a non -reimbursable payment of $30.00 to the City of Diamond. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by a non -reimbursable payment of $40.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overheads. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Diamond Bar. In accordance with the, requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Diamond Bar, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this 4`s day of May, 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City this 40' day of May, 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the 4`h day of May, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL, MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar California qp- ir�.� • '•M DIS �� \ 4 i 3r Ic, Z5 pt Tt qr Ilk TIft MCI In QA' 1p G tib g lo Pr . �, ,�' _ 3 :.a_ .f,. �'•fiJi s€�'.rai-rY�n.., � ' :4' �,11" �" ' _ , 5540) + ----- ` a 75 (V ,F,, N sa! n s 53 T 4, =n,. Co � ,c 4 95 SO N `" '' :..r ! 'tt`- wig ; � � � < .,.� • � cfr � �^' 10 t 03 TW c'� a � i l � tri 84 '';. -��►', (� �-i� ,g r It � c 24 . N �r �• � �� ,� �.� ,:+� �. �r �_ a xr�t ,a p •� � �`4�� .4„ ,A .. y f • u .. , ./ �� ,� , a��_yt.yc.4f�, , �`: " ��'• . re •G�i �n Y x,�.i��, .a a„:g �,4�,� .ru ''�� �rr�,x CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.: 6,, /0 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 28, 1999 FROM: Terrence L Belanger, City Manager TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving the Specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. SUMMARY: This Area 1 Slurry Seal Project is the first year of the new 5 -year Pavement Management Program. The new and enlarged Area 1 has a total pavement area of 3,810,000 square feet. An emphasis has been placed to rehabilitate highly distressed residential streets as identified in the Pavement Management Program. To maximize the City's resources and to extend the service life of the streets, the consultant and staff are recommending Cape Seal approach to rehabilitate some of the distressed streets. The Cape Seal approach involves an initial ARAM (Asphalt Rubber & Aggregate Membrane) overlay, followed by the slurry seal. Additionally, certain areas where the curb and gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches have displayed severe cracks/settlement will be reconstructed. The entire project has been incorporated within one set of project drawings, specifications and bid document package, which has been prepared by GFB-Friedrich & Associates. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the Specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Resolution(s) —Agreement(s) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: __ Public Hearing Notification x Other: Specifications on file at the City Clerk's office. 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A 4, Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? REVIEWED BY: Terrbnce L. City Manag James DeStefa Deputy City Manager x Yes _ No Majority _ Yes _ No _ Yes _ No _ Yes x No d G. Liu Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving the Specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. ISSUE STATEMENT To approve the specifications for Area 1 Slurry Seal Project and advertise to receive bids. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the Specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. FINANCIAL SUMMARY For FY 98-99: • $340,000.00 Gas Tax Fund has been allocated for Area 1 Slurry Seal; • $50,000.00 Gas Tax Fund has been allocated for sidewalk improvements in Area 1; and • $310,000.00 Gas Tax Fund has been allocated for certain residential streets as identified in the City's 5 -year Pavement Management Program, in Area 1. For a total of $700,000.00 allocated budget for Area 1. Engineer's estimate is $699,985.00. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Previously, the City was divided into seven areas and this project will begin the second cycle of street maintenance/slurry activities on a citywide basis including emphasis on addressing the rehabilitation needs in residential areas. With the approval of the 5 -year Pavement Management Program, the City has since been redivided into 5 areas (from the original 7 areas) in order to have a better maintained system and much less deterioration over time. This redivision of the City has enlarged the limits of Area 1. Slurry Seal Area 1 originally consisted of 2,418,000 square feet of pavement. An additional 1,392,000 square feet of pavement are (+58%) was added, for a new total pavement area of 3,810,000 square feet. With an emphasis on addressing the rehabilitation needs in residential areas, 4 additional residential streets in the newly created Area 1 have been identified for pavement rehabilitation. These streets are: Diamond Bar Boulevard frontage road between Goldrush Drive and Kidd Drive, Cleghorn Drive between Grand Avenue and Clear Creek Drive, Golden Prados Drive between Golden Springs Drive and Bridle Drive, and Great Bend Drive between Tin Drive and Stirrup Drive. To maximize the City's resources and to extend the service life of the streets, the consultant and staff are recommending Cape Seal approach to rehabilitate some of the distressed streets. The Cape Seal approach involves an initial ARAM (Asphalt Rubber & Aggregate Membrane) overlay, followed by the slurry seal. Additionally, certain areas where the curb and gutters, sidewalks and drive approaches have displayed severe cracks/settlement will be reconstructed. The entire project has been incorporated within one set of project drawings, specifications and bid document package, which has been prepared by GFB-Friedrich & Associates. Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor includes: ➢ Schedule to be submitted at least 10 calendar days before start of work; ➢ Traffic control plans; ➢ Notifications to residents, utility owners and other public agencies; ➢ Completion of all work within 50 working days; and ➢ Liquidated damages of $500/day for non-performance. Anticipated timeline for the project milestones is as follows: Approval of Plans and Specifications May 4, 1999 Notice to Bidders May 10, 1999 Bid Opening June 1, 1999 Award of Construction Contract June 15, 1999 Notice to Proceed/Start of Construction July 6, 1999 End of Construction September 14, 1999 Prepared By: David LiulRose Manela z RESOLUTION NO. 99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AREA 1 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented to the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be in the form and content as approved by the City Attorney and a copy of this Resolution shall be contained in each specification package for the work: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or before the hour of 11:00 o'clock a.m. on the 1" day of June, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the Area 1 Slurry Seal Project. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Diamond Bar, California, marked, "Area 1 Slurry Seal Project." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 1J0, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five; or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally; or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this Contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least 10 percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, or certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and material bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as a (Class A) contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Diamond Bar. The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar, California. Copies of the specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Diamond and a non -reimbursable payment of $20.00. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by a non -reimbursable payment of $30.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overheads. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Diamond Bar. In accordance with the requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Diamond Bar, California reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this 4h day of May 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City this 4`h day of May 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the 4h day of May, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar California It. ft . %D—.r h......—, .o.—:M 4.. — S.. 1, w A i. 7. Y — - . ...w., w.. C. .. - � LEGQQ SLUMMU 2E&L &RE&B LOCAL STREET MILEAGE AREA 1 s 19.6 C PY98—") AREA 2 ■ 22.0 c FC "-oo) AREA 3 s 23.6 cFYoo-•I) AREA 4 s 18.7 cpyet - *1) AREA 5 ■ 17.5 Wro1_ ,3 M � g of e % .10 p d 5 CITY Or DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO -7, i 11 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 27, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations" SUMMARY: The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State decriminalization of parking citations. The City established the parking penalty schedule through the adoption of Resolution No. 96-41. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to conform to the Diamond Bar Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt Resolution 96-41C "Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) _ Ordinance(s) _ Other: Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Los Anqeles Countv Sheriff's REVIEWED BY: n Terrence L. Belang Kellee A. Fritzal City Manager Assistant to the City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations" ISSUE STATEMENT: Should the City amend the Parking Penalty Schedule for clarity and consistency with the Diamond Bar Municipal Code? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt Resolution 96- 41C "Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations." FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The adoption of Resolution No. 96-41 C will have no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Pursuant to State law, cities are responsible for the processing of parking citations. Cities must adopt a Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties that list all infractions of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to be consistent with the Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code and to clarify the infractions. No fees are being increased; however, one section was added and several sections were removed from the list. The modifications are the following: Added: 10.16.410 - Parking Prohibited Amended: 10.08.080 — Parking Signs 10. 16.640 to 10. 16.660 — Taxicab Stands — Use Restrictions 10. 16.1240 to 10.16.1310(a) — Preferential Parking Districts Penalty Removed: 10.08.070 - Warning and Directional Signs 10.08.090 - Lane guidelines and Other Pavement Markings 10.080.140 — Weight Limit Signs; Emergency Procedures 10.12.910 — Established Specific Streets (weight limits) 10. 12.1130 — Bicycle Lanes — Placement; use by Motor Vehicles 10.16.560 — Parking in Intersections Permitted in Certain Cases The items removed frorn the Parking Penalty Schedule were deleted only on the schedule, not In the Municipal Code, because either the item was a non -parking issue or the item was better encompassed under 10.08.080 Parking Signs. The proposed new municipal code section 10.08.080 incorporates the failure to obey warning, directional or regulatory signs and all signs installed pursuant to section 10. 16, which regulate parking. The item added, Section 10.16.410, was accidentally left off the previous parking penalty schedule. The two items amended more accurately reflect the actual infractions to be cited regarding failure to obey the preferential parking districts and use restrictions regarding taxicab stands. RESOLUTION NO 96-41C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS A. Recitals (i) Section 40203.5 of the California Vehicle Code requires the City of Diamond Bar to establish parking penalties for parking violations and late payment penalties for parking violations. (ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution. 2. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby adopts as its parking penalty schedule that schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" together with each penalty and other fee amount set forth therein. 3. The parking penalty schedule adopted by the City Council in Resolution 96-41(B) is hereby replaced in its entirety in this Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, this day of , 1999. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar AMENDED EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE MAY 5, 1999 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES: Delinquency Notice Penalty $5.00 DMV Hold Penalty $48.00 Return Check Fee $15.00 PARKING PENALTIES: The following parking penalties are established for citations issued in the City of Diamond Bar by the Walnut Sheriff's Department. The first amount for each violation is the penalty if the citation is paid on "citation". The second amount is the parking penalty with the Delinquency Notice penalty. The largest amount is the parking penalty plus the Delinquency Notice penalty and the DMV Hold penalty. With With # Code Section Description Delinquency D.M.V. Penalty Notice Hold 1) DBMC 10.08.080 Failure to Obey Parking Signs 50.00 55.00 103.00 2) DBMC 10.08.100 Parking Space Markings 50.00 55.00 103.00 3) DBMC 10.16.110 Signs Limiting Parking Time Authorized in Certain 50.00 55.00 Circumstances 93.00 4) DBMC 10.16.120 Commercial Loading Zones 45.00 50.00 98.00 5) DBMC 10.16.130 Post Office Parking Restrictions 40.00 45.00 93.00 6) DBMC 10.16.140 Depositing Mail Restrictions 40.00 45.00 93.00 7) DBMC 10. 16.200 Passenger Loading 45.00 50.00 98.00 8) DBMC 10.16.210 Alleys; Parking Limits 45.00 50.00 98.00 9) DBMC 10.16.220 Temporary Restrictions Authorized in Certain 45.00 50.00 98.00 Circumstances 10) DBMC 10.16.410 Parking Prohibited 50.00 55.00 103.00 11) DBMC 10.16.440 Removal of Ignition Key when Parking 40.00 45.00 93.00 12) DBMC 10.16.450 Parking on Steep Grades 40.00 45.00 93.00 13) DBMC 10.16.460 Angle Parking 40.00 45.00 93.00 14) DBMC 10.16.470 Double Parking 45.00 50.00 98.00 15) DBMC 10.16.480 Parking Prohibitions for Specific Places; Council 45.00 50.00 Authority 98.00 16) DBMC 10.16.490 Parking Prohibitions for Vehicles over Six Feet High, 45.00 50.00 Near Intersections 98.00 17) DBMC 10.16.500 Parking on Private Driveways or other Public and 45.00 5000 Private Property 98.00 18) DBMC 10.16.510 Dual Roadways 45.00 50.00 98.00 19) DBMC 10.16.520 Parking between Curb and Adjacent Property 45.00 50.00 20) DBMC 10.16.530 Blocking Highway or Private Street 45.00 50.00 98.00 21) DBMC 10.16.540 Vehicles Transporting Hazardous Materials; Parking 335.00 360.00 98.00 Restrictions 408.00 22) DBMC 10.16.550 Blocking Driveways on Private Streets 45.00 50.00 98.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE PAGE TWO Registration/Equipment Violation upon proof of correction, penalty is reduced to $10.00 With With Delinquency D.M.V. # Code Section Description Penalty Notice Hold 23) DBMC 10.16.570 Parking Vehicles for Sale or Rent 45.00 50.00 98.00 24) DBMC 10.16.580 Special Hazard Areas; Parking Prohibition Authority 45.00 50.00 98.00 25) DBMC 10.16.590 Areas Adjacent to Schools 45.00 50.00 98.00 26) DBMC 10.16.600 Areas near Fire Hydrants on Private Roads 60.00 65.00 103.00 27) DBMC 10.16.620 Use of Assigned Parking Spaces 45.00 50.00 98.00 28) DBMC 10.16.630 Physically Handicapped Persons; Off -Street Parking 330.00 335.00 383.00 Facilities 29) DBMC 10.16.660 Taxicab Stands - Use Restrictions 25.00 30.00 78.00 30) DBMC 10.16.830 Highway Parking Requirements when Meters 25.00 30.00 78.00 Installed 31) DBMC 10.16.840 Parking Lot Requirements when Meters Installed 25.00 30.00 78.00 32) DBMC 10.16.850 Deposit of Fees Required 45.00 50.00 98.00 33) DBMC 10.16.1310(a) Preferential Parking Districts - Penalty 50.00 55.00 103.00 34) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Commercial Vehicle Parking Exceeding 1/2 Hour 47.00 52.00 100.00 35) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 36) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Third Offense within I Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 37) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Vehicle Exceeding 10,000 lbs. 47.00 52.00 100.00 38) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 39) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Third Offense within 1 Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 40) DBMC 10.16.190 Trailers or Semitrailers; Parking Requirements 47.00 52.00 100.00 41) DBMC 10.16.190(a) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 42) DBMC 10.16.190(a) Third Offense within 1 Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 THE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF STANDING AND PARKING LAWS CONTAINED IN THE VEHICLE CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS AS FOLLOWS: Registration/Equipment Violations: 43) CVC 4152.5 Foreign Vehicle Registration 30.00 35.00 83.00 44) CVC 4454(a) Registration Card Kept with Vehicle 30.00 35.00 83.00 45) CVC 4457 Stolen, Lost or Damaged Cards and Plates 30.00 35.00 83.00 46) CVC 5200 Display of License Plate 30.00 35.00 83.00 47) CVC 5201 Positioning of Plates 30.00 35.00 83.00 48) CVC 5201(f) Plates Clearly Visible 30.00 35.00 83.00 49) CVC 5202 Period of Display 30.00 35.00 83.00 50) CVC 5204(a) No Tabs 30.00 35.00 83.00 51) CVC 27155 Fuel Tank Caps 30.00 35.00 83.00 Registration/Equipment Violation upon proof of correction, penalty is reduced to $10.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE PAGE THREE With With Delinquency D.M.V. # Code Section Description Penalty Notice Hold California Vehicle Code Violations: 45.00 50.00 98.00 52) CVC 21113(a) Unlawful Parking -Public Grounds 50.00 98.00 53) CVC 22500(a) Parking within Intersection 45.00 45.00 50.00 98.00 54) CVC 22500(b) Parking on Crosswalk 45.00 50.00 98.00 55) CVC 22500(c) Parking/Safety Zone Marked with Red Paint 65.00 113.00 56) CVC 22500(d) Parking Fire Station Entrance 60.00 45.00 50.00 98.00 57) CVC 22500(e) Blocking Driveway 45.00 50.00 98.00 58) CVC 22500(f) Parking on Sidewalk 45.00 50.00 98.00 59) CVC 22500(g) Parking along Excavation 45.00 50.00 98.00 60) CVC 22500(h) Double Parking 255.00 260.00 308.00 61) CVC 22500(i) Parking in Bus Zone 45.00 50.00 98.00 62) CVC 225000) Parking in Tunnel 45.00 50.00 98.00 63) CVC 22500(k) Parking on Bridge 250.00 255.00 3 3.00 64) CVC 22500(1) Blocking Disabled Access Ramp 65.00 1113.00 65) CVC 22500.1 Additional Prohibited Stopping, Standing or 60.00 Parking; Fire Lane 45.00 50.00 98.00 66) CVC 22502(a) Parking 18" from Curb 45.00 50.00 98.00 67) CVC 22502(e) Curb Parking -One Way Roadway 55.00 103.00 68) CVC 22504(a) Unincorporated Area Parking 50.00 50.00 98.00 69) CVC 22505(a) State Highway Parking 45.00 330.00 335.00 383.00 70) CVC 22507.8(a) Disabled Parking -No Visible Placard/Plate 335.00 383.00 71) CVC 22507.8(b) Obstruction of Disabled Parking Space 330.00 335.00 383.00 72) CVC 22507.8(c) Parking -Disabled Crosshatches Boundary Lines 330.00 98.00 73) CVC 22510 Parking in Snow Removal Areas 45.00 50.00 113.00 74) CVC 22514 Fire Hydrants 60.00 45.00 65.00 50.00 98.00 75) CVC 22515 Unattended Vehicles 40.00 45.00 93.00 76) CVC 22516 Locked Vehicle 60.00 65.00 113.00 77) CVC 22517 Opening and Closing Doors 35.00 40.00 88.00 78) CVC 22520 Stopping on Freeway 35.00 40.00 88.00 79) CVC 22521 Parking upon or near Railroad Track 285.00 333.00 80) CVC 22522 Parking near Designated Sidewalk Access Ramps 280.00 158.00 81) CVC 22523(a)(b) Abandonment Prohibited 105.00 110.00 65.00 113.00 82) CVC 22526 Anti -Gridlock Act 60.00 105.00 110.00 158.00 83) CVC 22526 Second Offense -Anti -Gridlock Act 260.00 308.00 84) CVC 22526 Third Offense -Anti -Gridlock Act 255.00 93.00 85) CVC 22951 Street and Alley Parking 40.00 45.00 42.00 90.00 86) CVC 23333 Stopping and Parking -Vehicular Crossing 37.00 90.00 87) CVC 25300(c)(e) Warning Device on Disabled or Parked Vehicle 37.00 42.00 88) CVC 31303(d) Parking Hazard -Waste Carrier -Residential District 355.00 360.00 408.00 89) CVC 35712(a) Vehicle Exceeding 14,000 lbs. Posted 45.00 50.00 98.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. � TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4,1999 REPORT DATE: April 27,1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic" SUMMARY: Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code regulates the operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the Title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions of the Title and to improve traffic safety within the City. The amendments to the Title will ensure that the traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, approve for First Reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic" LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) X Ordinance(s) _ Other: _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ X No Which Commission? _ 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Engineering/Public Works/Sheriff's REVIEWED BY: 1 r� Terrence L. Belan r City Manager Kellee A. Fritzal Assistant to the City Manager CITU OOUNGIL REPORT MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic" ISSUE STATEMENT: Should the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, approve for first reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic." FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The adoption of the Ordinance will have no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic - regulates the operation of vehicles upon City streets to protect drivers, pedestrians and others. Title 10 includes: Traffic Signs, Signals and Devices; Stopping, Standing Parking; Abandoned and Inoperative Vehicles and other related divisions. In review of Title 10 and the Parking Penalty Schedule, it has been determined that certain sections should be clarified so that the residents may have a better understanding of the infraction provision and to improve the enforcement of all related parking regulations. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the drafted Ordinance and recommends the adoption. No increased regulations are being added. The additions to the Ordinance are underlined and The new section added Section 10.08.075 was the former Section 10.08.080. The proposed amended Section 10.08.080 Parking Signs incorporates the infraction of the failure to obey warning, directional, regulatory and all signs installed pursuant to section 10.16 — which regulate parking. Section 10.08.080 is the violation, which is listed on the parking citations. Therefore, the Sheriff's Department can cite one section for failure to obey signs in lieu of two or three. Section 10. 16.610 is recommended to be repealed, due to the section not being required and repetitive in nature. ORDINANCE NO. 1999 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 10 -VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.04.010 of Chapter 10.04 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (c) to read as follows: "(c) Not withstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b), pursuant to section 40200 of the California Vehicle Code, any violation of section 10.08.080, section 10.08.100, or any provision of Chapter 10.16 shall be subject to a civil penalty in accordance with Chapter 10.50 of this Code." Section 2 Section 10.08.020 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.08.020 Character of signals. The City Council shall determine the character of all official traffic control signals where the California Vehicle Code or California state law, re ulations or requirements do not so provide." Section 3 Section 10.08.070 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.070 Warning and directional signs. The City Engineer may place and maintain all official warning and directional signs necessary to the proper control of traffic. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs." Section 4 Section 10.08.075 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows: "10.08.075 RegulatoLy Signs The City Engineer shall place all regulatory signs and other markings required or authorized either by this title or by finding of the City Council or finding of the City Engineer. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs or other markings." Section 5 Section 10.08.080 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 1110.08.080 Parking Signs The City Engineer shall place and maintain all signs and demarcations required or authorized pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of this title or the California Vehicle Code. No person shall stop, park or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended in violation of anX sign erected or any demarcation established in accordance with this section or any restriction stated upon any such signor demarcation " The City &nDineef rt ttony signs and er by tr.• �. , a z h title b finding of h of finding ef the City Engineef! Section 6 Section 10.08.090 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.090 Lane guidelines and other pavement markings. The City Engineer shall may place appropriate traffic guidelines dividing highways into the number of traffic lanes that is proper and necessary and to shall place such other pavement markings as are necessary to direct vehicular movements in accordance with requirements of this title and the State Vehicle Code. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of such traffic guidelines or pavement markings." Section 7 Section 10.08.140 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.140 Weight limit signs; emergency procedures. If a weight limit is suspended pursuant to this chapter and a different weight limit is necessary, the City Engineer shall erect and maintain, during the emergency, appropriate signs. At the end of the emergency, the City Engineer shall remove such temporary signs and uncover and restore the original signs unless the City Council otherwise determines. No person shall operate any vehicle in excess of the posted weight limit upon any street or highway where such signs have been erected." Section 8 Section 10. 12.010 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.010 Driver training; driving on closed streets restricted. No A person shall *e4 operate any vehicle on any portion of the highway closed to through traffic for driver training except when engaged in driver training or for the purpose of going to or from a point within the specified closed area." Section 9 Section 10. 12.070 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.070 Pedestrian tunnels; closure conditions. Whenever the City Council finds and determines that the use of any pedestrian tunnel is dangerous because of the presence of loiterers, or for other reasons, and that it is not economically feasible to protect such tunnels other than by temporary closure, the City Engineer shall install gates and post signs, or cause such gates to be installed, prohibiting the entrance by persons into such a tunnel during such times as the tunnel is not required by pedestrians going or from the seheel premises and the City Engineer has caused such gates to be locked and has posted signs informing the public that such tunnel is temporarily closed. No person shall enter any tunnel closed pursuant to this section where such signs have been erected." Section 10 Section 10. 12.120 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.120 Flagman to regulate traffic when traffic control devices are inoperative. Whenever the City Engineer finds and determines that official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable, he may regulate traffic by means of any person given temporary appointment for such duty. No person shall fail to obey any such traffic regulation when operating any vehicle," Section 11 Section 10. 12.130 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.130 Flagman at construction and maintenance areas. Whenever the City Engineer finds that the regulation of traffic is necessary at the site of road or street construction or maintenance, he may regulate traffic by means of persons authorized for such duty No person shall fail to obey any such traffic regulation when operating any vehicle." Section 12 Section 10.12.310 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (c) to read as follows: "(c) No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of this section." Section 13 Section 10.12.510 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (3) to read as follows: "(3) No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such traffic control signals or stens. Section 14 Section 10. 12.540 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.540 Yield right-of-way signs — Installation required in certain circumstances. The City Engineer shall erect, or cause to be erected, yield right-of-way signs complying with provisions of the Vehicle Code at one or more approaches to an intersection of highways, which are not through hi hya s, where the City Council has determined that because of lack of visibility, or because of the number of reported accidents or the apparent probability thereof, such signs are considered necessary, and where according to the principles and experience of traffic engineering the installation of stop signs is not justified. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs when erected." Section 15 Section 10. 12.720 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.720 Turn restrictions — Near channelization devices. (a) At locations where channelization devices have been placed and the City Engineer finds that it is necessary to prohibit left turns or right turns for the purpose of diminishing the hazard of collision, he shall place appropriate signs prohibiting such left or right turns. (b) At those intersections where the City Engineer has placed such signs, no person shall operate a vehicle other than as permitted by such signs." Section 16 Section 10. 12.730 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.730 Same — Other intersections. (a) At all other locations at which the City Council has determined and found that the elimination of left turns or right turns is necessary to reduce traffic congestion or to diminish the hazard of collision, the City Engineer shall place appropriate signs prohibiting such left or right turns. (b) At those intersections where the City Engineer has placed such signs, no person shall operate a vehicle other than as directed and required or permitted by such signs. Section 17 Section 10. 12.750 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.750 Turning around prohibited in certain conditions. If the City Council finds that the volume of traffic, the width of the highway, and other traffic conditions at any intersection are such that the making of a U-turn at such intersection would create a traffic hazard, the City Engineer shall erect and maintain in a conspicuous place at such intersection an adequate sign stating that such U-turns are prohibited. No person shall operate a vehicle in violation of such signs when erected." Section 18 Section 10. 12.1120 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.1120 Pedestrians and bicyclists; roadway crossing restrictions. The City Engineer may place signs where it has been determined that conditions of vehicular and pedestrian or bicycle traffic are such that a traffic hazard would exist if pedestrians or bicyclists were permitted to cross the roadway at these locations directing that pedestrians and bicyclists shall not cross at a location so indicated. No ,pedestrian or any person operating a bicycle shall cross at any such location." Section 19 Section 10.16.110 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.110 Signs limiting parking time authorized in certain circumstances. Whenever the City Council finds that on any portion of the highway or of a private street or of any parking lot maintained or operated for the public by the city there is at any time lack of sufficient space to accommodate the drivers of vehicles and that the time of parking should be limited so that everyone may have his/her fair turn, the City Engineer shall erect and maintain adequate signs along such portion of the highway specifying the limitation on the time of parking. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of any such sign." Section 20 Section 10. 16.220 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.220 Temporary restrictions authorized in certain circumstances. Whenever the City Engineer finds that traffic congestion or traffic hazard is likely to result from the operation, stopping, standing or parking of vehicles during the holding of public or private assemblages, gatherings or functions, or during the construction, alteration, repair, sweeping or improvement of any highway, or for other reason, he may place or cause to be placed temporary signs prohibiting the operation, stopping, standing or parking of vehicles during the period such conditions exists and ig wing notice that the vehicle may be removed which signs shall be erected at least 24 hours prior to any removal No person shall operate park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of any such sign Section 21 Section 10. 16.430 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.16.430 Vehicles parked over 72 hours; removal by Sheriff (a) No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle upon a highway for 72 or more consecutive hours. W iW The Sheriff shall remove to a safe place every vehicle which has been parked or left standing upon a highway for 72 or more consecutive hours. (b) LcJ As used in this section, the words "safe place" include, but are not confined to, any garage, parking lot or open space owned by, maintained by or under the jurisdiction of the city, and also every privately owned garage the owner or proprietor of which will accept such vehicle." Section 22 Section 10. 16.490 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.490 Parking prohibitions for vehicles over six feet high, near intersections. Whenever the City Council finds that the parking of vehicles, with a height of six feet or more, within 100 feet of an intersection, creates a visibility limitation resulting in a potential traffic hazard, the City Engineer shall erect signs or markings stating that the parking of vehicles with a height of six feet or more is prohibited within 100 feet of an intersection. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such prohibition." Section 23 Section 10. 16.580 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows "10.16.580 Special hazard areas; parking prohibitions authority. At any place for a distance not to exceed 100 feet where the City Engineer finds that parking would unduly hamper the free flow of traffic, result in special traffic hazard, or endanger public health or safety, he shall place appropriate signs or markings prohibiting such parking. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such signs or markings." Section 24 Section 10. 16.590 of Chapter 16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.590 Areas adjacent to schools. Whenever the City Engineer finds that parking adjacent to any school property would unduly hamper the free flow of traffic or otherwise constitute a traffic hazard, he shall place appropriate signs or markings prohibiting such parking. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such signs or markings_" Section 25 Section 10. 16.610 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 26 Section 10. 16.630 of Chapter 16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.630 Physically handicapped persons; off-street parking facilities. Whenever the City Council designates stalls or spaces in an off-street parking facility, owned or operated by the City, for the exclusive use of physically handicapped persons whose vehicles display either one of the distinguishing license plates issued to disabled persons pursuant to Vehicle Code §22511.5 or to disabled veterans as specified in Vehicle Code §9105, a driver of any vehicle not displaying one of the aforesaid distinguishing license plates shall not park such vehicle in such parking space. The designation shall be made by posting immediately adjacent to, and visible from, each stall or space, a sign consisting of a profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on a blue background and by outlining or painting markings in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code." Section 27 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1999. Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on _ day of , 1999 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGEtTDA gEpAIiT AGENDA NO. �_ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 29, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATI�FINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY: Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation has requested approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue into 21 single-family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, the City Council concluded its public hearing and directed the preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 20, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification X Resolutions _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Ordinances Agreements EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Applicant SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Public Works Division REVIE ED BY; Terrence elang V `ger City Manager r ji DeStefano Deputy City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA ISSUE STATEMENT: Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation has requested approval of a one- year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue into 21 single-family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, the City Council concluded its public hearing and directed the preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 20, 1999. RECOM[ MENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time. BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1999 the City Council began its public hearing review of a proposed extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253. The project consists of 21 units upon a site located along the east side of Morning Sun Avenue. The City Council concluded its public hearing on the extension request and directed staff preparation of a resolution denying the application. On March 16, 1999 the City Council received a presentation from the agent, Mr. Jan C. Dabney, for the applicant, Mr. Amrut Patel of the Sasak Corporation requesting City Council consideration of an 17 lot alternative subdivision map for the 6.7 acre site. The City Council continued the matter to April 6, 1999 in order to permit the City staff an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposal. On April 6, 1999 the application was continued to April 20, 1999 at the request of the applicant. On April 20, 1999 the City Council received a presentation from Mr. Dabney that included a withdrawal of the 17 lot proposal and a further request for a continuance to May 4, 1999. City Council Report Tract Map No. 51253 The City Attorney has reviewed the letter from Mr. Daniel Wildish as presented on April 20, 1999 by Mr. Jan Dabney. The City Attorney does not find the arguments outlined within the letter persuasive and, as of this writing, has not received any additional communication from Mr. Wildish. A copy of the Wildish letter and the City Attorney is attached. Attachments: TB:JDS - Resolution No. 99 -XX. - Tentative Tract Map No. 51253. - Letter dated April 20, 1999 from Mr. Daniel Wildish to Mr. Jan C. Dabney. - Letter dated April 21, 1999 from the City Attorney to Mr. Wildish. - City Council meeting minutes of February 16, 1999, March 2, 1999, March 16, 1999, April 6, 1999 and April 20, 1999. 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TEHE FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS. The property owner/applicant, Armut Patel of Sasak Corporation, has filed an application for a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9. The project site is located east of Morning Sun Avenue and north of Pathfinder Road, Los Angeles County, Diamond Bar, California, as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Extension of Time shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. On May 17, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 95-21 and 95-22 approving the applicant's project. On May 17, 1995 the map was conditioned to respond to evidence of unresolved geotechnical concerns upon the property On May 19, 1995 a landslide occurred upon the applicants property. 4. The City Council approval was based on the applicant obtaining a permanent transfer of property from the Walnut Valley Unified School District to the applicant. The permanent transfer of property (approximately 3 acres) would allow the applicant access to the project site from Morning Sun Avenue and allow the applicant to expand the lot and pad size of lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, in order to comply with the required lot size and pad size. 5. The approved project would subdivide approximately 6.7 acres (owned by the applicant) and approximately 3 acres (owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District) into a 21 unit, single-family, residential development, along with the removal and replacement of oak and walnut trees and native vegetation according to the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program. 6. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL Maximum 3 Dwelling Units Per Acre). It is zoned Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size, 10,000 Square Feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -10,000-6U). 7. Generally, the following zones and uses surround the project site: to the north is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 15,000 Square Feet (R-1-15,000) Zone; and to the east is the Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -100,000-6U) and the Walnut Valley Unified School District property; to the south is the RPD -100,000-6U Zone; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size -8,500 Square Feet (R 1-8,000) Zone. 8. The City Council project approval expired August 6, 1998. The applicant submitted a written request for a one year extension of time, prior to the expiration of the map, as required by the Subdivision Map Act and Title 21 of the Los Angeles County Code (the City Subdivision Ordinance). 9. On November 24, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. At that time and pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to December 8, 1998. On December 8, 1998, pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to January 12, 1999. 10. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission concluded its public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 99-01 recommending City Council approval of the Application. 11. On February 16, 1999, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which testimony was received from interested parties, including the applicant. The City Council concluded its public hearing on February 16, 1999. 12. Notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 27, 1999. Notice of the public hearing was mailed to 137 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January 20, 1999. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this City Council hereby finds as follows: (a) Due to the Tract Map's design, 3 acres of property owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District is required for the Map's development as presented. Access to the project site through the Walnut Valley Unified School District property is essential. Without a permanent transfer of property from the School District to the applicant, the project site has no means of access. Additionally, in order to comply with the required lot and pad size, the permanent transfer of land, adjacent to the rear of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, from the School District to the applicant is also essential. Without the transfer of property, the Map cannot record. (b) The applicant has not demonstrated compliance with the conditions of approval. The following conditions of approval are required for final map approval/or map recordation: Resolution No. 95-21: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11. through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30., 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. Resolution No. 95-22: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11 through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30.; 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. (c) As a result of the landslide and subsequent grading activity the physical environment has changed. Evidence has not been presented to the City Council to support a finding that the earth movement has stabilized. (d) The applicant has not demonstrated through the completion of project conditions that the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed 21 unit residential development proposed. As a result, the design of the subdivision or improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (e) Further extension of the subject map is not warranted. The applicant should prepare and file a new map that addresses the foregoing unresolved concerns. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the City Council hereby denies the Application. With the denial of the extension of time, Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 expire and all privileges granted and related to these entitlements expire. The City Clerk shall: 3 (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of the Resolution, by certified mail, to: Amrut Patel, Sasak Corporation, 858 W. 9th Street, Upland, California 91785 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY 1999, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TBE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of May 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar 4 DANIEL A. WILDISH MARK A. NIALIS MARILYN L. SONETATi MI'CNAEL A. RETNOLOa JOSEFH R. MCFAUL LINDA L. ADAMS TNOMAS H. THRASHER, JR, CHRISTOPHER A, RIDpIE N. CATHERINE RLID CHARLES P. MURAWSKI JO NoFgas I.Ex LEE a. NADINOER CHRIaTOPHER R. ItILLET April 20, 1999 11 ..._.....N. NIA. -IB & $oNBTATI ATTORNEYS AT LAW ORANGE TOW@R 800 N. aTATE eoLLEOf IOULEVARD INLAND EMPIRE o><FICE SUITE 1200 AAA xr%9ALL DRIVE ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 02466 •a114 A -:II TELEPHONE (T11I Sa4•a 001 DAN SIFENARDIND, eALi.OANIA Aala7 FACSIMILE (71A) vaA-sass PAOSIMILA (fee) 1egal 31.91 6 •aoa VIA FACSB=: 714/203.2542 Mr. Ian Dabney Re: Vacant propefty/Diamond Bar/Patel Tentative 7*m Map Dear Mr. Dabney: T110MAG OL WAGNER OFOOUNSEL You have asked tbat I researcb a question concerai>dg yclient's efforts to obtain an extension of time m oompletr! the prOftsaing of a MW map. Dere to the lateness of your request for an opinion on this question, please understand that this opinion is preliminary and is based on a limited mview of the Each, With this qualification, it Is my opinion that the period of validity of the patel map was exaewled by opmtiu of law pursuant to e c t3overrenteat Code sectionsection66432.6(b), (c) sad ((f).This Code wi best allows for an q of the period of validity where ircamataaces itr he � Y or indireMly crease a moratorium or an irabUY to 8260Y a condition attached to the Tentative Map. Z7te authority for this proposition of OXIOWiAg the period of validity c m also be fous>d in 1'O 's A m, 2'� Fd. at section 6.21(11) u follows: b/L 3aVd 699£ 1+69 biL I-MLIX04 91ZVIK H9IQZIAt at -91 rani) 66. OZ xav April 20. 1999 Page 2 The period of validity does not include any period of time during which a development moratorium, imposed altrt approval of a tentative map, is in exiatecce. provided that the length of the moratorium does not exceed five yeas. Once the moratorium is terminated. the map is valid for the same period of time as was left to run on the trap at lite time the moratorium was imposed: however, if the remaining time is less tb m 120 -days. the map shall be valid for 12o -days following terminadon of the mwmrk= (a developmeat moratorium includes a water or sewer mosxtoriuM, IS well a other acting to rt g k% land use). A development nwratorium is deemed to exist where, fir any period of time, a eondition imposed by the local agency could mot be w6fied because the condition was one which. by its nature, necessitated action by the local agency, and the local agency either did not take the necessary action or by its own inaction was prevented of delayed in taking the neUMM &Cion prior to the expirntian of the tentative map. The perked of validity► also does not include any period of time during which a lawsuit involving the Approval of the tentative map bas been tiled and is pending, if a stay of the time period is approved by the local agency. Govt =wu Code section 66152.60). The conditions the existed at the site and prevented development could also be deemed a "friendly moratorium" as that term is described in the cm of CWUMIkCumb Homes Assn. v. City of Ins Aegeles (1993) ISCal. AppAth 1423, wherein the oov t iutstptetod Government Code section 66452.6 and overturned the City's decision to decry approval of a development project. Factually, we understand that the Tentative Tract Map was approved on May 17, 1993, with attached conditions, Oar May 23, 199S, a natural land subsidme occurred which primarily affeued adjacent property. The condition resulting from am 'Act of Cod" peraiseed until or about September 1997. During this petiod, the repair of the eomdition was outside do control of the applicant, and it would bave been ftitile to submit for fatal map approval in view of the condition attached to the Tentative Map - We also understand that a 12 -month extension of the Tentative Map was granted by the City, By our calmW ions, and considering the period of iattruptio®, the period of validity of the . Tentative Map continues through on or about August 2000. In conclusion, it may well be the case that a request for a faunal extension is now premature as the time period for the validity of the Tantmdve Map has not yet expired. it ea ft the City Council's consideration of the audmitiea contained bervin, it may be prudent to postpone the applicant's request for an extension for a brief period. V/E '3Ovd 6980 bE9 VIL 1IV13NOH 911VIN 149IC71A 64:91 CIA.L) 66 , 0a IVdV April 20, 1999 Page 3 If you have any question or copy, Plane do not hesitate to contsot the undtnigned. Very truly yours, ISH. M' AQLIS 80 An DANIEL R WM-DISH cc: Mr. A. Patel APR -27-1999 17=08 FROM RICHARDS WATSON 9 GERSHON TO 19098613117 Ir N RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTOFWdM AT LAW � L. o iom Ysew�u peress2e.� ae�a.+ew w nnEwa- cc �Jlrm.eHie • T. �°" TMSFrrr FIaMTN FLOOR sz awe. 311 S >UTH MOPE STREET P. 02,'02 RICHARD KCHARM (14"0-1100) SM FPANCAm oFwer Daniel R. Wildish Wildish, Nialis & Bonetati 500 N. State College Drive Suite 1200 Orange, CA 92668-1639 Re: Sasek Tract/City of Diamond Bar Dear Mr. Wildish: RK"NRD PWK4A= SAN FVV W4GWCO OFFlCE BLIflE 080 FON"-FQNw MOMTOOMEW 21MEET SAN FwAM(J` 0A0. CA.UROONIA ","."l 1 (4ts) 421.44" 19A( MO -E (A, s) 42i.8488 ORANGE COVN" OFFlCE 1"UM90% ONE CIVKi C NTCw CIS ea-► CALRaWAA M21 (7Ty 080480, FACSIMILE C11141 9004910 a Gq-AWn . w1LLM M K t01AM6, 05662'72 OUR RLE NUMBER 11393-00001 Your letter of April 20, 1999 addressed to Jan Dabney regarding the above matter was delivered to the Diamond Bar City Council last evening during its regular meeting. I was asked by the Council to review your letter and comment on it at the next meeting. T have read the California Country Club Homes case cited on page two of your letter and am perplexed by both your brief recitation of the facts of the case (which is inaccurate) and your reliance on the case in this instance. I am wondering whether you intended to cite a different case; if not, perhaps you could explain with greater particularity why you think the case supports your position" Thank -you for your cooperation. MJ:mj 0666212 CC: Terry Belanger, City Manager V ly yo rs, is Jenkin t City At orney City of Diamond Bar TOTAL P.0? RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW OLO M AwATaeN WCNAM Q. a X.^PV% owe A Ooo�aebwAL aerwewAT,ew NAAW L aMWASNON OouoLA4 w. Awet,c A TLDEN qM OAe,4A t. AWq/wA THIRTY r113NTM FLOOR MiYUC L iA1M14j� � E. AM" RArOM O. NY/E e. mwA110 Mm 39� SSOIfTTI MOPE SiTP1EET UAMOi.ft & 0*0" Ayp+! ABAt.tt!,+ FCTkR N h L OCNED �AAt4 LOS ANOELES, CALIFORNIA 80071-144M -I^kW* . RLLLAM L WWAL 82 09901%A , w. NAlOAAN (217) BZO.W94 AN"40wr B. ewewwr wrN P. vow"M FACSIMILE 6f1C "LL M A960" OAt+ j^owB f21 �i6-0078 TBNOTwr L NEVFEID 4S41%0 A AH"O 0R004— w. W111PANCKM V. MTM MwCi 110CN/N.L Lwo."a OAMD Ab6dwr 0�K9 MN=P MLJENONO w66 AM P. qtr I„ a cRAA Am MmNfAVALLWA MM OUWN M. "MOW LVMN t. yAMA April 21, 1999 CA/gL w. CSMA, B• vounom .,BFFR A PLAN Town TMBNO! t p8111 go" o ORlOORr M tRiN87fT L EOIA vwca"o Mem" eam. Lj" gOo0 vAgN0 AMANDA F. woo""0 ONN! AR100M1 OIto44 ROV A CL a OBOpOM " ROLAOIAIB IA OA`AAVK ftNAw eft MARIBU.PIOAOM KAw 07lVOd N. ttAH•AWw ME(1►M./K. IMNO �i �ww18 - =wv=OwAN tO:NN a d'NM PATPN4M K OLAPM R08M1 O. liA1Vr4 OANYIIA\MoeONOUON MONABL. BOTRAG 8WM@1K CC" LAVIvL%ICC 0. wIR41CA MATTPN[w Q M/IONBLL f,LVMR OwA RAM,A WVTVWWM 2AB2A Daniel R. Wildish Wildish, Nialis & Bonetati 500 N. State College Drive Suite 1200 Orange, CA 92668-1639 Re: Sasek Tract/City of Diamond Bar Dear Mr. Wildish: RK"NRD PWK4A= SAN FVV W4GWCO OFFlCE BLIflE 080 FON"-FQNw MOMTOOMEW 21MEET SAN FwAM(J` 0A0. CA.UROONIA ","."l 1 (4ts) 421.44" 19A( MO -E (A, s) 42i.8488 ORANGE COVN" OFFlCE 1"UM90% ONE CIVKi C NTCw CIS ea-► CALRaWAA M21 (7Ty 080480, FACSIMILE C11141 9004910 a Gq-AWn . w1LLM M K t01AM6, 05662'72 OUR RLE NUMBER 11393-00001 Your letter of April 20, 1999 addressed to Jan Dabney regarding the above matter was delivered to the Diamond Bar City Council last evening during its regular meeting. I was asked by the Council to review your letter and comment on it at the next meeting. T have read the California Country Club Homes case cited on page two of your letter and am perplexed by both your brief recitation of the facts of the case (which is inaccurate) and your reliance on the case in this instance. I am wondering whether you intended to cite a different case; if not, perhaps you could explain with greater particularity why you think the case supports your position" Thank -you for your cooperation. MJ:mj 0666212 CC: Terry Belanger, City Manager V ly yo rs, is Jenkin t City At orney City of Diamond Bar TOTAL P.0? FEBRUARY 16, 1999 PAGE 6 7.3 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9. M/Chang opened the Public Hearing Jan Dabney, J.C. Dabney & Assoc., agent for Mr. Patel, spoke on behalf of the applicant and stated that he is not Mr. Patel's engineer of record. Mr. Patel has not addressed the conditions of approval because the project was approved in May, 1995 and the landslide had already occurred. Patel's project did not have enough mass to butress the overall landslide that occurred during this period of time. Therefore, Mr. Patel had no choice but to wait until the school district's mitigation took place and possible litigants were determined. The school district spent hundreds of thousands of dollars for geotechnical review to determine what had actually caused the landslide. However, they did not make the information available to Mr. Patel or any of his neighbors. For about 26 months, Mr. Pater had no r -1 - means to do anything on his property that might have a bearing on the landslide or the conditions of approval placed on the project. — Therefore, additional time is needed in order to meet the conditions of approval. FEBRUARY 16, 1999 PAGE 7 Clyde Hennessee spoke in favor of granting a one-year extension. Following an extensive question and answer period with the applicant's agent, M/Chang closed the Public Hearing. In response to C/Huffs question about whether the residents of Morning Sun Ave. were notified of tonight's Public Hearing, CM/Belanger indicated that they were. In response to C/Huff, CE/Wentz stated that the condition of Mr. Patel's property is difficult to determine because pertinent information is not available to the City, based upon the work completed and representations made to the City that the remediation work done by the school district was done in accordance with their geotechnical engineer's recommendation. The missing piece is Mr. Patel's property and completion of the stablization of the small portion of area. The question of whether Mr. Patel is able to stabalize the remainder of the site must be addressed by Mr. Patel's geotechnical engineer. C/Huff believed that this project made sense as a part of the South Pointe Master Plan but not on its own merits. There are too many unanswered questions regarding what was a flawed project from the beginning. The City has been unable to satisfactorily work with the applicant on this project. And in spite of the fact that Mr. Dabney has made an eloquent effort on behalf of Mr. Patel, he said he could not support an extension of this map. C/Ansari said she was told by one of the residents of Morning Sun Ave. that they are in litigation and are, therefore, not present for tonight's meeting. Mr. Dabney did well by Mr. Patel. However, she was against this project in 1995 and now, with the problems of dealing with Mr. Patel and with the fact that the land is moving, she cannot, at this time, vote in favor of an extension for this project. If Mr. Patel wishes to bring the City another map which proposes construction of 12 houses, that is another matter. ACA/Susskind recommended that in the event of denial of the extension of time, that the Council direct staff with respect to required findings contained in the Subdivision Map Act. The Council has indicated items'of concern that would qualify as findings such as, consistency with the General Plan and the Specific Plans; physical suitability for the type of development and for the proposed density of the development; design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems; substantial environmental damage, etc. FEBRUARY 16, 1999 PAGE 8 Following discussion, C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial containing findings as set forth by ACA/Susskind, for the extension of time request. MPT/O'Connor stated that she would vote to deny the extension of time. Further, she did not understand how the City can continue with the map since so much has changed because of the landslide. She questioned whether a new Environmental Impact Report is needed because the original EIR was done for the entire South Pointe Master Plan which no longer exists. She questioned whether the map would be approved under the new General Plan and Development Code. She also questioned how many of the original conditions of approval may have changed due to the landslide.. Further, she wondered whether the Buyers Awareness Package would include the fact that the homes are built on a landslide. How can the 'City approve a project built on a known landslide and what proof does the City have that the landslide poses no further public danger. The project might possibly move forward without the school district's property but it would need to be a different configuration. The land continues to move. Where would an access be located if the school district's property is not included in the project. She indicated that her questions may add to the findings of denial and that she wass not asking for answers to her questions. In response to C/Ansari about the City's legal responsibility when it approves a project and landslides occur after completion of the project, ACAISusskind responded that, contained within the Municipal Code, are immunities for approval of developments. CM/Belanger pointed out that the City has approved projects that are on historic landslides. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8. OLD BUSINESS: None 0-7 MARCH 2, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL 8. OLD BUSINESS: r 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation has requested approval of a one-year extension of time in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. CONTINUED TO MARCH 16, 1999. 8.2 MATTER OF MID -YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT #1 for FY 98/99 General Fund Budget and FY 98/99 Special Funds Budget. MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Huff seconded, to approve the budget adjustments for FY 98/99 General Fund Budget and the FY 98/99 Special Funds Budget. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang. NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None r ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera 8.3 PARK IMPROVEMENTS AND ADA UPGRADES FOR RONALD REAGAN PARK AND HERITAGE PARK - S. rl- ARCH 16, 1999 OLD BUSINESS: PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO: 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map 51253, Conditional use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Ave. and generally north of Pathfinder Rd. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. (Continued from March 2, 1999.) Martha Bruske stated that, in the interest of history and truth, Council received testimony at the meeting of May 17, 1995 that the land was sliding and they approved the project that evening. CM/Belanger stated that on May 17, 1995 only one of the current Council Members was a Council Member on that date and she voted not to approve the project. Jan Dabney stated that, in accordance with Mr. Patel's instruction, he has modified the project by reducing the impact to the blueline stream. In addition, the total number of trees scheduled for removal has been reduced by 70%; the land grading was reduced 35%. The project includes landform grading techniques and is a very buildable/doable project. The areas of concern to the Walnut School District with respect to geotechnical considerations have been set aside and are not a part of the map today. The portion of the property that was to be transferred to the school district per the agreement has been increased. The project has been reduced to 16 lots that would remain with Mr. Patel. The 17th lot would be transferred to the School District. Lot 17 was originally about 9,000 sq. ft. and has been increased to about 46,000 sq. ft. as an outgrowth of the landform grading. Off-site grading was reduced from approximately 3 acres to slightly less than one acre. CA/Jenkins explained that the matter before Council is the question of whether to extend the life of a map, which is before Council, and not the map that has been presented this evening. The Council can take an action on the map that is before the Council to approve or deny the extension, approve with conditions, or continue the matter to allow staff an opportunity to review the new map and make a recommendation as to whether or not the new map presents sufficiently changed circumstances that might warrant a change in staffs current recommendation, which is to deny the extension. A denial would allow the applicant an opportunityto reapply with a new map and begin the process once again. Following discussion, C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to continue the matter to April 6; 1999 to allow staff time to review the proposed changes. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.2 MATTER OF APPOINTMENT OF TWO DELEGATES AND ONE ALTERNATE TO THE TRES HERMANOS CONSERVATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS - (Continued from March 2, 1999). .4fC4.4- 6, 1999 CITY COUNCIL 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from March 16, 1999. Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No - 92 -12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its Public Hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999,'the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration - Continued to April 20, 1999. 8.5 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT S APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51243, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from April 6, 1999. Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No: 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. CA/Jenkins explained the considerations available to Council based upon a letter presented to the City by Mr. Patel's attorney. He did not agree with the opinion that the map is valid absent an extension of time approved by Council. Jan Dabney, representing Mr. Patel, explained Mr. Patel's current position and requested that the matter be continued to May 4, 1999. Mr. Dabney responded to C/Huff that Mr. Patel would withdraw the 17 lot _ subdivision and take his chances with litigation in trying to compel the Council with a writ of mandate for an act of God. Clyde Hennessee believed Council had been very accommodating to the applicant and he would like to see the issue resolved in two weeks. Following discussion, M/Chang moved, C/Ansari seconded, to continue the matter to May 4, 1999. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ::f:[sass:v:iasi3•iia:i:esis::e:i�tiHHHmtie•••:'i.� ';••;a;i:::iv^•••ii:ilii::HiHi:SaW�H111ttit1111HH1SpppSCSYiittilliiiilStiiiYSSiSSSSYWH.4SYil♦SAS!>CEgHHppiptlltlHSilaSHiitia[SSSSS!lite:StaIIHISSHIvaSlavtH:atael[t131331i1aSlays[ttittitt INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERRENCE L. BELANGER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: QUITCLAIM OF PROPERTY BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR — BREA CANYON ROAD DATE: 04/29/99 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the payment of $196,000 to the County of Los Angeles, as consideration for the quitclaim of 2.57+/- acres of property, located, generally, between Diamond Crest Lane and Sapphire, along Brea Canyon Road. DISCUSSION: The matter of the ownership of the 6.58+/- acres of Brea Canyon Road property, which was sold to Arciero/Woodbridge, has been raised by the County of Los Angeles. As you recall, the City declared the City -owned Brea Canyon Road property, which was comprised of 4.01 acres of former water district property and 2.57 acres of excess right-of-way (6.58+/ - acres) surplus in the Summer, 1997. Thereafter, all relevant public agencies were duly notified of the City's intention to sell surplus property. No comment, objection or exercising of first right of refusal demand was received, by any agency. After the close of the required notice period, the City sold the property, to Arciero/Woodbridge, in September, 1997. In 1998, the County of Los Angeles Public Works Department wrote the City to indicate that about 2.57+/- acres of the land that was sold belonged to the County. The County made a demand for the appraised value of the land: $196,000. The City staff met with members of the County staff to discuss the assertion of ownership and related claim for payment. Following the meeting, the City Attorney was asked to research this matter. The City Attorney found. In 1992, the County wrote the City to indicate that the land in question belonged to the City. The title report related to the sale of the property did not indicate that the County held title to the property. There were no responses, including the County, to the notice of the City's intention to sell the property. In fact, the County did abandon the roadway easements on the property, which had come to the County as surplus State right-of-way property, and recorded the abandonment, in May, 1988. Although the County's interest in the property was rendered a fee simple one, the County did not assign parcel numbers to the property, for record notice purposes. The Title Company was apparently aware of the status of the property, but did not divulge it in the title report, upon which the City and Arciero/Woodbridge relied. The affected parties in this matter are, arguably, the current property owners of related lots in the Diamond Crest Estates subdivision, including the developer, Standard Pacific. Obviously, the County is affected. Standard Pacific and other subdivision lot owners are affected because it has a right to clear title to the property it purchased. The County is affected because it owned the subject property and has a right to valuable consideration for its sale. The City, arguably, was enriched by the sale, by the amount that has now been demanded by the County: $196,000. Therefore, it is recommended that the City pay the County $196,000, on the condition that the County quitclaim the property to the City of Diamond Bar. The City, thereafter, would quitclaim the property to Standard Pacific or other affected owners of record. It is recommended that the City fund the payment to the County of Los Angeles using one of the following three alternatives: Use General Fund unappropriated reserves. 2• Sell $300,000 of Proposition A Transit Fund reserves to substantially fund the reimbursement. 3. Pay from the Parks and Facilities Development Fund, which is the Fund in which the proceeds of the sale of the 6.58+/- acres were placed. 2 KA 3. 4. 5 91 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 41D REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 20, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Huff called the meeting to order at 12:12 a.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, Vice Chairman Huff. Chair/Ansari was excused from the meeting. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director, Mike Jenkins, Agency Attorney; James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/O'Connor moved, AM/Chang seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - Chair/Ansari 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - As submitted. 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 20, 1999 in the amount of $706,780.59. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 RESOLUTION NO. RA99-03: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 13 WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the D.B. Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement No. 13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 & 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 2 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AM/Herrera moved, AM/Chang seconded, to adopt Resolution No. RA 99-03 approving Advance and Reimbursement Agreement No. 13 with the City of Diamond Bar in the amount of $6,000. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari 6.2 AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP The Redevelopment Agency has retained Rosenow Spevacek Group to provide real estate and economic consulting services to DBRDA related to Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center (opus/Allstate Project). Additional authorization is necessary as a result of professional services rendered in response to final negotiations with Opus. The existing contract needs to be amended from $20,000 to a total of $26,000. AM/Herrera moved, AM/O'Connor seconded, to approve an amendment to the existing agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group for real estate and economic consulting services related to office complexes on Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center in an amount not to exceed $6,000. Further, authorize and direct the Executive Director to Execute the amendment. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: None AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Vice Chair/Huff adjourned the meeting at 12:14 p.m. LYNDA BURGESS, Agency Secretary ATTEST: Vice Chairperson DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Ansari and Board of Directors FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, May 4, 1999 DATE: April 30, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated May 4,1999 for the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated 050499 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID VOUCHERS 610 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOND .00 19_206.61 - REPORT FOR ALL FUNDS -206. 61 APPROVED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Finance Director Terrence L. Belanger Executive Director Eileen R. Ansari Robert S. Huff Vice Chairman TOTAL 19,206.61 19,206.61 RUN DATE: 04/29/1999 15:55:59 DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: i DUE THRU: 05/04/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK NORRIS REPK.E INC 6107110-46411-RO198-46411 9703-8/'{ BREA GYN RD REHAB -FEB 4,080.50 6107110-46411-R01913-46411 9703-8/9 BREA CYN RD REHAB-DEC/JAN 3,454.50 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 7,535.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7,535.00 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 6107110-44020-- 4121/4122 RDA LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL 1,596.65 6107110-44020-- 41'1.1/4122 RDA LEGAL SVCS-COURCHESN 296.60 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL 'JOUCHERS 1.8'7'3.25 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 11893.:5 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC 6107110-44000-- CONSLT SVCS -OPUS WEST 5,173.66 6107110-44000-- 8443 CONSLT SVCS -OPUS WEST 4,604.70 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 9.778.:36 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 01,778.36 REPORT TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 REPORT TOTAL VOUCHERS 19,206.61 REPORT TOTAL 19,206.61 TO: DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMCNT AOCNOY AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0. k.3 Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director MEETING DATE: May 4, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 FROM: Linda G. Magnuson°Finance Director TITLE: Treasurer's Report—March 31, 1999 SUMMARY: Submitted for the Redevelopment Agency Board's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of March 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report — Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) — Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) — Ordinance(s) — Other: — Agreement(s) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes — No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? _Yes — No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A — Yes — No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA — Yes — No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? NIA — Yes — No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belanger / Executive Director DEPARTMENT HEAD: Linda G. Magnu on Finance Director vinmv"L) oMR RwL;r«vrmLnT PWF- gay RePaRIF AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: May 4,1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Board FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement — March 31, 1999 ISSUE STATEMENT: Per Agency policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the Redevelopment Agency Board's review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the March 1999 Treasurer's Statement. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Submitted for the Board's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of March 1999. This statement shows the cash balances for the Redevelopment Agency, with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from investments. Linda G. Magnuson DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT March 30, 1999 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FD $1,072,197.90 $9,306.25 $1,062,891.65 TOTALS $1,072.197.90 SO 00 $9,306.25 $0.00 ;1,062,891.65 SUMMARY OF CASH: DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT $79,851.15 TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS $79,851.15 INVESTMENTS: 983,040.50 TIME CERTIFICATES LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 0.00 TOTAL INVESTMENTS $983,040.50 TOTAL CASH $1,062,891.65 Note: The Redevelopment Agency approved a development and disposition agreement with "Triple T Diamond Gateway, LLC' This agreement requires the Agency to invest $983,040.50 in a Time Certificate of Deposit. The agreement provides that the developer guarantee the current LAIF investment yield- L.A. I.F ield. L.A.I.F -Effective Yield for February 1999 5.210% Certificate of Deposit Yield (11/16/98 - 5/16/99) 4.500% Terrence L. Belanger, Treasur v