Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4/20/1999
Tuesday, April 20, 1999 5:00 p.m. — Closed Session — CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District Main Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mayor Wen Chang Mayor Pro Tem Debby O'Connor Council Member Eileen Ansari Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Bob Huff City Manager Terrence L. Belanger City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Lynda Burgess Copies of stats reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Cleric a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinla'ng in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO COr&IISSION AND COMIvETTEE MEETINGS) PUBLIC INPUT The meetings ofthe Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member ofthe public may address the Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of interest which are within the subject matter jurisdiction ofthe Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in person to the City Clerk Asa general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion ofthe Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business ofthe Council Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks towards Council Members or other citizens. Comments which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City Council and will not be tolerated Your cooperation is greatly appreciated In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public comment on items previously considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Committee meetings.) In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Council meeting. In case of emergency, or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting ofthe agenda, upon making certain findings the Council may act on an item that is not on the posted agenda. CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect to a regular or special meeting ofthe Diamond Bar City Council. A Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member ofthe staff thereof, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting. B. A breach ofthe peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly course of said meeting. C. Disobedience of any lawful order ofthe Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from addressing the Board; and D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72 hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer through a phone modem Every meeting ofthe City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business days in advance ofthe meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 pm Monday through Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules ofthe Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Information (909) 860-2489 NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA. 1. CLOSED SESSION: 2. 3. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Next Resolution No. 99-22 Next Ordinance No. 05(1999) 5:00 p.m., CC -8 Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9 6:30 p.m., April 20, 1999 Mayor Pastor Larry Grigsby, Calvary Chapel Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor, Mayor Chang Mayor SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to D.B.H.S. Students Monique Cho, Jeff Huang and Nancy Li for receiving a perfect score on the SAT's. 3.2 Presentation of City Tile to Lt. Dave Stothers, upon his retirement from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. 3.3 Proclaiming April 30, 1999 as "Dia de los Ninos: Celebrating Young Americans." 3.4 Proclaiming April 25 to May 1, 1999 as "Safety Seat Checkup Week." 3.5 Presentation by Foothill Transit. 3.6 Informational update regarding City efforts to oppose the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Expansion Project. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 2 this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, l pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk form is voluntary). There is a five (completion of this minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - April 22, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 CITYWIDE CURBSIDE BULKY ITEM COLLECTION - April 24, 1999 - 7:00 a.m. 5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - April 27, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - May 4, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 6.1.1 Study Session of April 6, 1999 - Approve as submitted. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated April 20, 1999 in the amount of $1,068,400.38. Requested by: Finance Division 6.3 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Kathryn McGrath on April 5, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council deny the Claim for Damages and refer the matter for further action to the City's Risk Manager. Requested by: City Clerk 6.4 RESOLUTION N0. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AT HIGHCREST DRIVE - In order to ensure that APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 3 motorists making turn movements maintain their respective lanes and to ensure that vehicles on Goldrush Dr. come to a complete stop when reaching Highcrest Dr., the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommended installation of 50 ft. of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection of Goldrush and Highcrest Dr., and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush at Highcrest. On April 6, 1999, staff recommended the installation of multi -way stop signs to reduce potential safety hazard. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Dr. at Highcrest Dr. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.5 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MEADOWGLEN ROAD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - Council awarded an engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers St. and Meadowglen Rd. Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with L.A. County Department of Public Works to approve the storm drain and NPDES requirements. There has also been a public information meeting with residents to discuss the project's intricacies and to receive further residents' input. Another public information meeting will be scheduled after the City has awarded the construction contract. DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for this Project. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Rd. Public Street Improvements Project in said City and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.5 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 1998-1999 CDBG HANDICAP RAMPS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - This 98-99 CDBG Project is for handicap access ramp installation at various locations in the vicinity of the local public schools. Handicap ramps are proposed at the following APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 4 schools: Golden Springs Elementary (13 ramps), Armstrong Elementary (15 ramps), Castle Rock Elementary (12 ramps), Walnut Elementary (7 ramps), and Evergreen Elementary (7 ramps). Due to the increase in construction costs, the public schools scheduled had to be phased. The following schools have proposed handicap ramps for the second phase: Quail Summit Elementary (6 ramps), Chaparral Intermediate (6 ramps), Maple Hill Elementary (7 ramps), and South Pointe Middle (2 ramps). Phase 2 ramps will be bid as alternate items with this year's project so that if the unit prices received are lower, additional ramps may be completed. Dewan, Lundin & Associates has prepared the specifications for the project. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving plans and specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project, and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to receive bids. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.7 AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES OF CONVERSE CONSULTANTS FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - On October 6, 1998, Council approved and extended a Consulting Services Agreement with Leighton & Associates as a City Soils and Geology Engineering firm. Until that time, the City had been utilizing four professional consultants to provide on-call/as-needed soils and geotechnical engineering services. One of those firms was Converse Consultants. Noted in the October 6, 1998 Council report, the existing projects being reviewed by Converse Consultants and others, would continue until the development projects are finalized and completed through FY 1999-2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development -related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated on a time -and - material basis from the applicant's deposit account. Also, the applicant compensates the City approximately 18� of the consultant costs for overhead. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from existing developer deposit accounts to continue the pre -October 6, 1998 assignments for soils and geotechnical engineering services of Converse Consultants in an amount not -to -exceed $51,489 through FY 99-2000. Requested by: Engineering Division APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 5 6.8 AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - On October 6, 1998, Council approved extensions of Consulting Services Agree- ments with Charles Abbot Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. as the City Civil Engineering Services firms. Until that time, the City had been utilizing six civil engineering companies to provide on-call/as-needed civil engineering plan checking and inspection engineering services. Dewan, Lundin & Associates is one of those firms. As noted in the October 6, 1998 Council report, existing projects being reviewed by these firms would continue until the development projects are finalized and completed through FY 99-2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development -related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75% of the applicant's fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fees for continuance of the pre -October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by Dewan, Lundin & Associates. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through FY 99-2000 is not -to -exceed $25,500. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.9 AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR EXISTING PROJECTS - On October 6, 1998, Council approved and extended a Consulting Services Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. as the City Civil Engineering Services firms. Until that time, the City had been utilizing six civil engineering companies to provide on-call/as-needed civil engineering plan checking and inspection engineering services. GFB-Friedrich & Associates, Inc. is one of those firms. As noted in the October 6, 1998 Council Report, the existing projects are finalized and completed through FY 99-2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development -related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75% of the applicant's fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 6 Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fees for the continuance of the pre -October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by GFB-Friedrich & Associates, Inc. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through FY 99-2000 is not -to -exceed $37,600. Requested by: Engineering Division 6.10 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE SURPLUS OF THREE CITY VEHICLES WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.24.200 - The City of D.B. Municipal Code Section 3.24.200 authorizes the City Manager, with approval of Council, to surplus all personal property which is no longer used or has become obsolete. Currently, the City has three vehicles, which are no longer used because of the present condition of the vehicles. Therefore, this Resolution would allow the City to appropriately dispose of these vehicles. These items will be auctioned on a competitive basis, and a record shall be kept of each item sold. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX and authorize the City Manager to surplus the vehicles as listed in Exhibit "A." Requested by: City Manager 6.11 EXTENSION OF VENDOR PRINTING SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER AND RECREATION GUIDE - Under purchasing guidelines, awards for services to a single vendor shall not exceed $10,000 without prior authorization from City Council.. Requests for quotations for printing the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide are usually sent to approximately six qualified vendors. This fiscal year, there have been two vendors (Graphics United; Bradshaw Brothers Printing) that have consistently submitted the lowest bids. Due to the nature of the task, and the process involved in selecting the vendor with the lowest qualified bid, it is quite possible that a qualified vendor could become the winning bidder more than once during the year. Thus, a single vendor could exceed the $10,000 limit. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize additional work to be performed by either, Bradshaw Brothers Printing or Graphics United APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 7 (whichever is determined to be the lowest qualified bidder) so that the selected company can proceed with printing the summer 199 issue of the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide. The total amount awarded to these vendors for services rendered this fiscal year shall not exceed $15,000 for Bradshaw Brothers or $25,000 for Graphics United, at this time. Requested by: Communication & Marketing Division 6.12 AUTHORIZATION TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PURCHASE A 1999 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE - At the October 20, 1998 Council Meeting, the Council approved the expenditure of AB 3229 (COPS Program) monies for the 98/99 FY. The approved list of expenditures for the L.A. County Sheriff's Department includes purchase of a vehicle to be utilized as an unmarked sedan. The City intends to utilize the aforementioned funding mechanisms to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for the L.A. County Sheriff's Department. However, pursuant to the City's Purchasing Ordinance, Council must grant approval for the City Manager to sign the necessary documents because the cost of the vehicle exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000).. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to purchase the 1999 Pontiac Bonneville in an amount not to exceed $20,000. Requested by: City Manager 6.13 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND THE DOLEZAL COMPANY AND THE DOLEZAL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Mr. Warren Dolezal is the owner of property located in the 3000 block of Steeplechase In. On June 20, 1995, the City approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 23382, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-1 and Oak Tree Permit No. 95-2 for the proposal of subdividing the property into four residential lots. On September 15, 1998 the City Council denied the applicants request for an extension of the land use approvals. Subsequently, Mr. Dolezal filed an action in Superior Court seeking to overturn the City denial. Upon execution of the Agreement, Dolezal will submit a cashier's check in the amount of $5,020.74 for payment of the City processing costs related to the 1998 extension request. Dolezal will file an amended map containing a maximum of 3 lots which will provide for the preservation of the existing oak tree and submit a filing fee deposit for the processing of the amended map. The City will expeditiously schedule public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration of the 3 parcel map. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 8 Recommended Action: It is Council authorize the Mayor the Agreement. Requested by: City Manager recommended that the City and City Attorney to execute 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 96-41C: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. Through adoption of Resolution No. 96-41, the City established the current penalty, which needs to be amended in order to conform to Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. Continued from April 6, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 96-41C amending the parking penalty schedule for parking penalties and late payment fees for parking violations. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets.. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions of the Title and to improve traffic safety within the City. The amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. Continued from April 6, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, waive full reading and approve first reading by title only, Ordinance No. 0X(1999) regarding traffic regulations and amending Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic. Requested by: City Manager APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 9 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from April 6, 1999. Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation has requested approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Ave. into 21 single family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its public hearing and directed the preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 6, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation from the staff, review the alternative plan and (1) direct staff to prepare an appropriate resolution approving an extension of time; or 2) adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time. Requested by: Planning Division 8.2 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTIHAZARD FUNCTIONAL PLAN - The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. SB 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve the coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations, which took effect in September 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Plan will bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future. Continued from April 6, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan and authorize the Mayor to sign the Letter of Promulgation on APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 10 behalf of the City. Requested by: City Clerk's Office 8.3 EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE - The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force was presented to Council on July 21, 1998. In August 1998, Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues and institutional impact. A presentation was made before Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five Task Force recommendations requiring additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50° diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selection of a single service provider for the single-family residence sector and stipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi -family residential housing. Continued from April 6, 1999. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council review the staff report and direct staff concerning the key findings. Three pathways are identified, of which two are proposed for deliberation: implement the identified five program elements in either an open or exclusive hauling environment in the residential sector. No change in hauling is proposed for the commercial/industrial sector. Requested by: Engineering Division 8.4 APPROVAL OF THE 1999-2000 CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - Council has developed their 99-2000 Goals and Objectives, which have been divided into two categories; immediate time sensitive and regular goals and objectives. They have been ranked by the Council and have 19 general categories. There are 58 goals and objectives for the 99-2000 FY. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the 99-2000 Goals and Objectives. Requested by: City Manager 8.5 APPOINTMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AND CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSN. APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 11 Recommended Action: Make appointments as necessary. Requested by: City Manager 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE RATE INCREASES FOR CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES PROVIDED BY CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS - Shall the City Council approve the Resolution opposing the rate increases for the cable television service provided by Century Communications? Recommendation: It is recommended by the Cable Subcommittee that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX opposing the rate increases for the cable television service provided by Century Communications. Requested by: City Council Cable Television Sub - Committee 9.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 13 WITH THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the D.B. Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement #13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 and 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving Advance and Reimbursement No. 13 with the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $6,000. Requested by: City Manager 9.3 SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES RE: LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER FORENSIC FACILITY PROJECT - The City Manager has contacted the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter and Hampton, LLP, specifically Jack H. Rubens, regarding representation of the City relative to the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Facility Project. The City Manager has authorized an expenditure in the amount of APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 12 $5,000. In a Closed Session held April 15, 1999, Council directed the City Manager to contact Mr. Rubens and extend the assignment. The longer term retention requires further action of Council and a budget adjustment. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council enter into a contract and authorize special legal services with the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, in an amount not to exceed $50,000 and allocation of $50,000 from the General Fund unallocated fund balance reserves. Requested by: City Manager RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Next Resolution No. RA99-03 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, C/Ansari 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Redevelopment Agency (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Redevelopment Agency. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 6, 1999 - Approve as submitted. Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated April 20, 1999 in the amount of $706,780.59. Requested by: Finance Division 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 13 5. OLD BUSINESS: 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 RESOLUTION NO. RA99-XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 13 WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the D.B. Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement #13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 & 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency adopt Resolution No. RA99-XX approving Advance and Reimbursement No. 13 with the Diamond Bar City Council in the amount of $6,000. Requested by: City Manager 6.2 AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP - The Redevelopment Agency has retained Rosenow Spevacek Group to provide real estate and economic consulting services to DBRDA related to Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center (Opus/Allstate Project). Additional authorization is necessary as a result of professional services rendered in response to final negotiations with Opus. The existing contract needs to be amended from $20,000 to a total of $26,000. Recommended Action: It ds recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors approve an amendment to the existing agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group for real estate and economic consulting services related to office complexes on Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center an amount not to exceed $6,000. It is further recommended that the Redevelopment Agency authorize and direct the Executive Director to execute the amendment. Requested by: Executive Director 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a APRIL 20, 1999 PAGE 14 future meeting. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: C' ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: DATE: 4 PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature jt u U-UNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO CITY CLERK F=ROM: DATE: �d AD[ RE'SS: PHONE: OR( ANIZATION: AGE VDA #/SUBJECT: 9. i expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM:Ja" DATE:ZlJ 9 ADDRESS: K 4ade ilg i -e, PHONE: �-�j 3 ORGANIZATION: �• !/G�:�J ft.�" AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature LU: TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK DATE: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: if PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: � �`JWe- 10AA4d DATE: ADDRESS: <S /fie.�� PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 61Aj4,9AID $cZ14 E,Y/T (eA,�r,-16,1y�v/�J I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. �f Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL I� TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: .2D ADDRESS: -- ��- '� PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: i expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. 1,7 Signature MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 6, 1999 STUDY SESSION: CLOSED SESSION: 4:20 p.m. Room CC -2, SCAQMD a) Goals & Objectives b) Traffic Impact Solutions 6:00 p.m. - Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the regular City Council meeting to order at 6:42 p.m. in the Auditorium of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. CA/Jenkins reported that Council asked his office to fully investigate all avenues relative to the possibility of initiating litigation to oppose the expansion of the Lanterman facility. In addition, the City has engaged the services of another law firm to look into these issues as well, so that the City has the services of two separate law firms exploring all avenues relative to whether or not a sound basis exists to file a lawsuit to oppose the expansion project. Tomorrow, a lawyer will be traveling to Sacramento in order to inspect all of the State's files in connection with this expansion project. In addition, he has begun working closely to share information and theories with the City Attorney of Pomona. Pomona has directed its City Attorney to file litigation in this matter. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Kathleen Newe. INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Reverend Rex Wolins, Associate Pastor, Diamond Canyon Christian Church. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: CM/Belanger requested the following: a. Continue Item 7.1, Public Hearing on Parking Penalty Schedule, to April 20, 1999. b. Continue Item 8.3, Resolution Denying an Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map 51253, to April 20, 1999. C. Continue Item 9.1, Standardized Emergency Management Systems (SEMS) APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL Multi -hazard Plan to April 20, 1999. d. Move Item 8.4, Resolution opposing the Establishment of a Forensic Treatment Program at Lanterman Developmental Center for discussion prior to Public Comments. Council concurred with CM1Belanger's recommendations. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 Introduction of new Team Lieutenant Brent Cannady, Walnut Sheriff Station - Continued indefinitely. 3.2 Proclaimed April 11-16, 1999 as Library Week. 3.3 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Earthquake Preparedness Month. 3.4 Proclaimed April, 1999 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 3.5 Presented City Tile to Robert Steelwagon, owner of the Shopping Center at Golden Springs Dr. and Lemon Ave. MATTERS TAKEN OUT OF ORDER: 8.4 LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER'S SERVICES FORENSIC EXPANSION PROJECT - A) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FORENSIC TREATMENT PROGRAM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORENSIC PATIENT SECURITY COMPOUND AT THE LANTERMAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER - The State Department of Developmental Services has determined, and the State Legislature has approved the transfer of 75 forensic patients to the Lanterman Developmental Center. Phyllis Baca asked why, after a year and a half, is the Council suddenly opposing this project. She asked for a copy of the first letter received from Sacramento as well as other correspondence received by the City. She asked if Council was told to remain quiet about this matter. Martha Bruske said that Lanterman has experience in caring for clients and that the facility has not caused the area any harm in its 72 year history. She believed that this time should be used to discuss how all parties concerned could work together. She also believed that the facility's clients are better APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 3 _ CITY COUNCIL cared for in the hospital rather than in community homes. The State owns the property and could use the land for a prison or a facility in which to house sex offenders or the acutely mentally ill. Kim Chapman, 22713 Happy Hollow, said she lives in the neighborhood that is situated closest to Lanterman - 1100 feet from the proposed expansion. She indicated that she and her neighbors have firsthand knowledge of Lanterman residents wandering aimlessly on the hill behind their homes and she cited several incidents that have occurred in her area. She urged the Council to hire an attorney to file a lawsuit on behalf of the residents of Happy Hollow Rd. against the State for improper notification of the project. Sue Sisk, 1087 Flintlock Rd., felt that Council and the State were grossly negligent in notifying the residents. She thanked Council for forming a Task Force to address the issue and she believed that there had been misrepresentation by Lanterman regarding the extent of the project. She felt that housing forensic patients is a type of "prison." She reported that more than 1250 residents signed petitions over the holiday weekend and she was in support of the proposed resolution opposing the Lanterman project. Michael Lin, real estate sales and property management, expressed concern about the safety of his friends and their families. He felt that the State failed to properly notify the residents of the project. He pointed out that other developers are required to give notice of proposed projects. He asked citizens to join him in standing up for their rights as taxpaying citizens to stop the project before it destroys the neighborhood community. Bob Watts, 23845 Strange Creek Dr., explained that his home is about 400 yards from the Lanterman Development Center's entrance. Between his home and Lanterman, is a retirement center and several families with children. He was concerned that it would take only one incident to cause harm to one of these residents. He thanked Council for helping to make the community safe and encouraged them to continue their course of action to get forensic patients located to a more rural area. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes asked for a definition of 'forensic" as it applies to the Lanterman project. The community must do something to reduce the fear and anguish of the residents. Darla Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said that the City needs to address behavioral health beds" as well as, 'forensic beds. Although these patients may not have committed crimes, they are still dangerous. Wally Lyman, 615 Firepit Dr., lives very close to the Lanterman facility. He and other residents in his area were notified about the Lanterman project only about 10 days ago, not by an official agency, but by a flyer placed on APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL their doors. He felt the residents should have received proper notification. Contrary to what he had been told, he believed that the project will adversely affect property values in the area. Betty Johnson, 546 EI Encino Dr., said she has always felt comfortable and safe in D.B. She asked Council to do its best to ensure the community's continued safety. Clyde Hennessee pointed out that the Chino Men's Facility is only 15 miles from D. B. Citizens need to be prepared for the worst possible situation. He asked why the Lanterman guards are not armed. Jennifer Hoey, 1104 Clouds Rest Dr., does not want to have to tolerate acceptance of this situation. She wants a safe living atmosphere for her family and her neighbors. She asked Council to do what is right. Fred Encinas, 716 North Looking Glass Dr., thanked Council for appointing him to the Task Force. He spoke about Pomona's lawsuit to stop the project. He read an article from the April 6 issue of the Daily Bulletin which quoted Councilman Robles of Pomona. He also read from an April 4 Daily Bulletin article regarding the project. He asked Council and the citizens to continue the fight to stop the project. He believed that Lanterman officials are not telling the truth about the project and wanted Council to expose the truth and ask Lanterman officials to stop the violence against protestors of the project. Craig Parks, 222 Gunsmoke Dr., said that this project sounds like a "prison." He urged Council to do whatever they can to prevent this project from moving forward. C/Ansari agreed with Mrs. Bruske that Lanterman has been a good neighbor. However, when you hear that the project proposes that double 16' fences spaced 4' apart with four 28' high observation guard towers, double gated entry sally port with an access/ingress control building and a security staff of more than 30 personnel, it sounds like a prison to the community. She believed it is incumbent upon her to take a stand in Opposition because of the potential security risk to the community and the security of the current Lanterman clientele. She explained how the project was down- played to the community. Knowledge of the facts changes the tone of the Lanterman project. D. B. is no longer the rural area that it was 72 years ago when Lanterman was first established. She said she will fight to stop the project; however, there are only five Council Members and the citizens need to send letters and make telephone calls to the State's elected officials protesting the project. C/Herrera stated that on March 16, 1999, Council established a Task Force to meet with community members to discuss options regarding the APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL Lanterman project. The last three weeks have been filled with a great deal of activity on the part of City staff and residents in opposing the project. The City has committed thousands of dollars toward that end and the five Council Members have been contacting individuals and officials in order to attempt to influence others to oppose the project. Last night, the Pomona City Council took a position to oppose the project and voted to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop the project. Pomona invited D.B. to join with them in the fight to stop the project. The City Attorney reported at the beginning of tonight's meeting that this Council had a closed session during which the Council directed the City Attorney to pursue D.B.'s options regarding the City of Pomona in filing a lawsuit to stop the project. This morning, she, MPT/O'Connor and Paula Lance, Pomona City Council Member, appeared before the L.A. Board of Supervisors and urged them to adopt a position of opposition to the Lanterman expansion project. The vote was four Yes. Walnut City Council will consider the matter at its meeting tomorrow night (April 7). This Council and this City is doing everything it can to form a strong coalition. She asked CA/Jenkins to talk about the State's powers of authority regarding its programs. CA/Jenkins explained that the State is the paramount governmental authority and can do what it chooses with its property. The State does not have to comply with local zoning laws and the State has undertaking the authority and responsibility for the care of those persons with developmental disabilities including those who have committed crimes. The State has passed laws and adopted statutes and policies that dictate what type of facilities those persons are to be placed in and what types of standards judges must be guided by in the placement of such individuals when they are determined not to be competent to stand trial. The State has established facilities for the placement of those persons until they are in a position where they are competent to stand trial for the crimes that they have committed. Generally speaking, cities, as creatures of the State and subsidiary bodies of the State, have very little authority to stand in the way when the State sets its mind to use its property for those purposes, particularly when those purposes are determined to be the advancement of a State policy. As earlier stated, his firm has been asked to look at all possible avenues of opposition. The State is obligated to comply with environmental laws and a great deal of study has been started relative to whether the State has indeed complied with environmental laws in the approval of this facility. Ultimately, it becomes more of a political issue than a legal issue as far as the City is concerned. It may be that there are people who own property in the vicinity who may have other issues and other considerations that are not shared by the City. Those property owners are in a position to do whatever is necessary to protect themselves. The City can only participate in this matter with respect to assuring that the State has fully complied with environmental laws and has otherwise complied with all other requirements with which it must comply in going forward with a project of this. kind. The Council has APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL contacted elected officials at the State level in order to apply pressure to see what can be done about changing the State's plans. However, it should not be forgotten that the law is clear that the State has plenary authority over cities. C/Huff believed the City was "snookered" about the project. The City relied upon the good will that it had developed with Lanterman over the years. When Lanterman speaks about forensic patients, it is on a very low-key level. As more information is received, the City becomes more concerned. By definition, this project is a "prison." He also expressed concern about the compromised good will of Lanterman and their recent tactics of confiscating video tapes. He stated that Council is committed to making this matter right. MPT/O'Connor said that each Council Member attends meetings on a daily basis which could be considered "secret" because they do not notify each and every resident. The Lanterman meetings were not secret meetings - they were attended by D.B., Pomona, Walnut, Cal -Poly, Sheriff Department, CHP and City of Pomona police department personnel. She read a letter she wrote on February 11, 1999 to Ruth Maples, Executive Director of Lanterman_ She stated she attended the Lanterman meetings last year and she trusted what was said during the meetings. As time went on, she came to realize that the facts were not as originally presented. She recommended that language be added to the proposed Resolution that Council wishes to join forces with surrounding communities in fighting this matter and that the Resolution acknowledge that in the past Lanterman has been a good neighbor to the City of D.B. M/Chang spoke about the efforts of Council and staff to oppose this project. C/Huff expressed concern about adding language to the Resolution regarding Lanterman's previous record because the City cannot corroborate this information. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-16 opposing the establishment of a forensic treatment program and the construction of a forensic patient security compound at the Lanterman Developmental Center, with the following amendment: Following the sixth WHEREAS, insert and, "WHEREAS, the State of California failed to provide effective notice to the Diamond Bar community which is especially inexplicable in light of the failure to provide notice to surrounding communities related to other recent projects i.e.: Metropolitan Hospital in Norwalk and, "WHEREAS: the City of Diamond Bar will work in concert, with its neighboring cities (Pomona, Walnut and Industry), the County of Los Angeles, Cal Poly -Pomona, State elected officials, Congressional elected officials, other public agencies/institutions and community individuals and organizations, to oppose the Lanterman forensic expansion project." Motion APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None B) MATTER OF LANTERMAN AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT TASK FORCE MISSION STATEMENT - On March 30, 1999, the Task Force approved a Mission Statement related to the proposed Lanterman Forensic Project. David Bell expressed concern that the Task Force members who work for Lanterman are not working cohesively with the City's Task Force members. He asked that, in good faith, Council should remove the two Lanterman employees from the Task Force and appoint new members who are committed to stopping the project. Sue Sisk clarified the Mission Statement Task Force discussions. She believed that this is a working document only. C/Huff explained that the City can attempt to carry out the Task Force's mission. Martha Bruske pointed out that Task Force members who work for Lanterman are D.B. residents. Joseph Farrell, 23721 Jayhawker Ln., said he is a member of the Task Force and strongly believed that the Lanterman employees who are Task force members do not strongly support the views of the group and do not have the best interest of D.B. in mind. He outlined reasons why he is opposed to referring to Lanterman as a "good neighbor." Wally Lyman also believed that Lanterman employees should be asked to resign from the Task Force. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes stated that the Task Force cannot prevent Lanterman employees from being present during meetings. Bob Watts recommended that the City change the name of the Task Force to a name reflecting its opposition to the Lanterman project. Fred Encinas asked Council to publicize its opposition actions, reimburse the Task Force for its expenses and to more visibly and vocally show their outrage at this project. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL In response to C/Ansari, Mr. Encinas indicated that he would like the Council to request that Lanterman return the confiscated video tape to its rightful owner and to stop escalating violence against petitioners. Kim Chapman asked for a response to her question regarding whether the City will provide funding for legal services to represent the Happy Hollow residents. CM/Belanger stated that staff will contact Mrs. Chapman tomorrow morning regarding this matter. Linda Farrell spoke about the confrontation with Lanterman staff and clients while she was petitioning residents in front of Von's Market. M/Chang reminded the audience to focus on the agenda item. Joe Ruzicka stated that there about 900 children in the D.B. Little League bordering the railroad tracks and Sunset Crossing which is in close proximity to the proposed project and the district board is very concerned about their safety. The Little League does not have funding to provide protective measures from potential Lanterman escapees. MPT/O'Connor reminded the audience why the Task Force was established. She felt that Lanterman employees might be able to give the Task Force information it did not already have. She stated she will ask her Lanterman employee Task Force member to resign. However, Task Force meetings are public meetings and Lanterman employees may attend the meetings. C/Huff proposed adoption of the Mission Statement. He stated that the Task Force job is finished and he proposed formation of a committee to oppose the Lanterman Forensic Expansion with five members appointed by each Council Member. He read a suggested Mission Statement for the new committee. CA/Jenkins stated that the dissolution of the Task Force and formation of a committee is not on the agenda and should be scheduled for the next Council meeting. C/Huff moved, MPT/O'Connor seconded, to accept the Mission Statement. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL C/Huff moved, C/Herrera seconded, to consider the matter of the status of the Task Force an urgency matter for potential disbanding of the Task Force. Motion failed by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Huff NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Martha Bruske reiterated that the Council failed to adequately notify the residents regarding the Lanterman project. Thom Pruitt stated that the Lanterman Expansion Project would potentially have an adverse effect on the D.B. Pop Warner Football and Cheerleader program in that some of the group's activities are held in the vicinity of the YMCA which is adjacent to the Lanterman facility. He announced that the Pop Warner Football organization will hold its annual Celebrity Invitation Golf Tournament on Monday, May 3 at the Via Verde Country Club. Carolyn Elfelt and Janet Roberts invited the Council and residents to participate in the DBHS stadium expansion festivities to be held on Friday and Saturday, April 16 and 17. Allen Wilson stated that the Friends of the Library Wine Tasting Soiree will be held on April 25 to raise funds for books and other community related library projects. Aaron Flisik reminded the Council that there is a need for a skateboard park in D.B. In response to Clyde Hennessee, MPT/O'Connor explained that the Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6 budget adjustment is the total amendment amount for the change in General Fund expenditures. Carol Wilner, Lorbeer Middle School Principal, spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No. 6.9. She suggested that the afternoon time be changed to 2:15 to 2:45 p.m. Joseph Farrell asked for an explanation of the vote to place an item on the agency as an urgency item. Jeff Koontz, D.B. Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Grand Opening for the Hand Car Wash will be held on Saturday, April 17 adjacent to the Country Hills Towne Center. He spoke in support of Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6. He recommended that a neon sign be added for "No Right Turn" purposes that would be monitored by the crossing guard. Fred Encinas reiterated the need for press releases on Council Member's activities regarding Lanterman. He recommended that the Walnut Sheriffs Station be alerted APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL to potential conflicts between residents and Lanterman employees. Sue Sisk asked for an explanation of legal issues regarding the Task Force. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 8, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - Tuesday, April 13, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.3 CITY 10th BIRTHDAY PARTY CELEBRATION - Sunday, April 18, 1999 - 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m., Peterson Park, 24142 E. Sylvan Glen Dr. 5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, April 20, 1999 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Thursday, April 22, 1999 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.6 CURBSIDE BULKY ITEM COLLECTION - Saturday, April 24, 1999 beginning at 7:00 a.m. to include furniture and appliances. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item No. 6.8. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote with MPT/O'Connor voting No on Consent Calendar Item No. 6.6: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6.1 APPROVED MINUTES: 6.1.1 Joint Public Hearing of March 16, 1999 with D.B. Redevelopment Agency - as submitted. 6.1.2 Regular Meeting of March 16, 1999 - as submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED & FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.2.1 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1999. 6.2.2 Regular Meeting of February 23, 1999. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL 6.3 RECEIVED & FILED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES: 6.3.1 Sheriffs Department Presentation Workshop of January 14, 1999. 6.3.2 Regular Meeting of January 14, 1999. 6.3.3 Regular Meeting of February 11, 1999. 6.4 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 6, 1999 in the amount of $744,145.02. 6.5 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT - February, 1999. 6.6 APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 BUDGET AMENDMENT No. 2 (MPT/O'Connor voted No). 6.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 100 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY WEST OF PRESADO DRIVE AND 50 FEET OF RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PATHFINDER ROAD IMMEDIATELY EAST OF PRESADO DRIVE. 6.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-18: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF "NO RIGHT -TURN ON RED, 7:30 A.M. - 8:00 A.M./2:15 P.M. - 2:45 P.M., SCHOOL DAYS ONLY: SIGNS AT ALL QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE". 6.10 AWARDED CONTRACT TO DEWAN LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES (DLA) FOR PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CABLE UPGRADE - in an amount not -to -exceed $5,000 for inspection services related to the Cable System Upgrade. All fees will be paid by Century Communications. 6.11 RESOLUTION NO. 99-19: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR A 1998-1999 TIRE RECYCLING GRANT - for a 1998-1999 Playground Cover and Surfacing Grant. 6.12 EXTENDED VENDOR SERVICES FOR PUBLICITY BANNERS - authorized additional work to be performed by Dekra-Lite for banners, banner support poles and banner installation/removal in an mount not -to -exceed $15,000 for FY 98/99. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL 6.13 AUTHORIZED ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR REMEDY - In the amount of $3,500 for temporary secretarial support assistance, making the total to Remedy in the amount of $14,520. 6.14 APPROVED AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR MINUTE SECRETARY SERVICES - authorized the City Manager to approve an additional expenditure of $500 with Carol A. Dennis, amending the total contract amount to $23,500. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.8 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 50 FEET OF DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING ON EACH RESPECTIVE LEG OF THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND HIGHCREST DRIVE, AND A STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTING LEG OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AT HIGHCREST DRIVE - Continued to April 20, 1999. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 (a) RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS - The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State's decriminalization of parking citations. Through adoption of Resolution No. 96-41, the City established the current penalty which needs to be amended in order to conform to the Municipal and California Vehicle Codes. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. M/Chang declared the Public Hearing open. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20, 1999. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 0X(1999): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING TITLE 10 - VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - Title 10 of the Municipal Code regulates operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions and improve traffic safety. These amendments will ensure that traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City. and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations, thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL M/Chang opened the Public Hearing. There being no testimony offered, M/Chang continued the Public Hearing to April 20,1999. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 PRESENTATION BY THE ROTH GROUP REGARDING THE COMMUNITY/CIVIC CENTER TASK FORCE - Council established the Community/Civic Center Task Force to study the possibility of creating a focal point for the D. B. community. Marlene Roth, principal of The Roth Group, presented an update of the Task Force's activities. 8.2 AWARD OF CONTRACT TO COCA COLA FOR INSTALLATION OF VENDING MACHINES IN CITY PARKS - Council approved a policy to allow installation of vending machines in City parks to generate revenue. Staff released an RFP and received three responses. A committee of three staff members interviewed each of the proposers and recommended awarding a contract to Coca Cola Bottling Company. Features of the proposal include: 1) two state-of-the-art vandal resistant machines to be installed in each park at no cost to the City; 2) all stocking and maintenance costs to be borne by Coca Cola; 3) City will receive 35% commission on each $1 of sales, less sales tax and CRV, and 4) each park will have soda, non -carbonated drinks and water. MPT/O'Connor asked that a "lock -down" provision be included in the contract so that the machines are not available for use when various sports organizations are selling items from concession stands. Following discussion, C/Ansari moved, C/Herrera seconded, to approve the agreement for twelve months (one year) with the addition of a termination clause, with the addition to a lock -down provision and with a maintenance turn -around time of 24 hours, with the exception of weekends. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-12 APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD - Continued from March 16, 1999. Amrut Patel of SASAK Corporation is requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 in order to subdivide approximately 6.7 acres into 21 single family lots. The project is located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue and generally north of Pathfinder Road. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, Council concluded its Public Hearing and directed preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration - Continued to April 20, 1999. 8.5 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES (PETER LEWANDOWSKI) REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE WOHL PROJECT AND THE LANTERMAN FORENSIC PROJECT - The existing contract amount is $5,560. An additional allocation of $14,000 is requested to permit additional environmental services as necessary. The total amount of the contract will increase to $19,560. MPT/O'Connor moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Environmental Impact Sciences (Peter Lewandowski) in the amount of $14,000. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 8.6 EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE - The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force was presented to Council on July 21, 1998. In August 1998, Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues and institutional impact. A presentation was made before Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five Task Force recommendations requiring additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50% diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selection of a single service provider for the single-family residence sector and stipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi family residential housing. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL Don Gravdahl expressed concern regarding a proposed $4 green waste pickup charge and how the inclusion of commercial/multi-family accounts could help the City reach the State mandated requirements for recycling. Clyde Hennessee did not want to bear the burden for the cost of recycling. C/Ansari asked that staff explain how San Dimas has reduced its recycling by 64%. C/Herrera moved, C/Huff seconded, to continue this matter to April 20, 1999. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTI - HAZARD FUNCTION PLAN - The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. SB 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve the coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations which took effect in September, 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Pian will bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future. Continued to April 20, 1999. 9.2 RESOLUTION NO. 99-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING PACIFIC BELLS' 411 RATE INCREASE - SBC/Pac Bell has applied to the California Public Utilities Commission for permission to increase the charge of a local directory assistance call from $.25 up to $1.10. This is a 340% increase. In addition, SBC/Pac Bell is asking to raise the rate of an emergency break -through call from $1.00 to $5.00. C/Huff moved, C/Ansari seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 99-20 with a clarification of the term "not any other dial around numbers" to the Council. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 9.3 RECOMMENDATIONS BY CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE: (a) SUPPORT SB 597 (POOCHIGIAN) - Would require a city's consent prior to acquisition, through eminent domain, by a joint exercise of powers authority/agency, where the property proposed to be acquired is within the boundaries of the city. If said property is within the city's sphere of influence area, the county in which the property is located must consent to the condemnation. A city's participation as a party to the joint owners agreement to form the authority/agency shall not constitute the consent required by this section. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 99-21: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING POLICY GUIDELINES REGARDING RIVERS AND MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS - There are several State legislative proposals which would create a rivers and mountains conservation authority related to the San Gabriel River watershed area. The proposals are very different in scope and approach. In an effort to avoid, at least at this point, choosing between the legislation, the League of California Cities, L.A. Division. (c) Legislative Committee, adopted policy guidelines to guide the League member cities regarding any rivers and mountains conservancy legislative proposal. (d) SB 1277 (HAYDEN) - Would prohibit construction of new roads and other infrastructure in or through units of the State ark system and land reserves that are either leased or held in fee simple title. Further, it would exclude infrastructure specifically identified in an approved General Plan for the park or reserve that is necessary for operation, maintenance, management or use of the park or reserve. However, construction can be approved by a legislative measure requiring approval of a two-thirds vote of the membership of each house of the Legislature. C/Herrera moved, C/Ansari seconded, to approve (a), (b) and (c). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Huff, MPT/O'Connor, M/Chang NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: M/Chang recessed the Meeting to the Redevelopment Agency at 11:50 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M/Chang reconvened the City Council meeting at 11:50 p.m. 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Huff stated that he has devoted most of the past three weeks to the Lanterman project. He hoped that the Council Member's actions clearly convey their commitment to this matter. He asked that during the Kosovo conflict, citizens please extend their hearts and prayers to the families of the captured soldiers and NATO forces that are in harms' way. C/Ansari said she had attended many meetings regarding the Lanterman project. She continues to work to obtain funding for transportation going out of California into Texas. She asked that the Larkstone Park matter be placed on the next City Council agenda. C/Herrera believed that all Council Members are united in our effort to oppose the Lanterman expansion project and are working diligently to successfully conclude this matter in such a way that officials in Sacramento will locate the forensic facility at a different location. MPT/O'Connor concurred with C/Herrera's comments. She requested that staff meet with the D.B. Amateur Radio Society members to review the applicable section of the newly adopted Telecommunications Ordinance. M/Chang reported that Council has been working very hard on behalf of the community to successfully resolve the Lanterman project matter as well as other important matters that affect the residents of D.B. He thanked the citizens for their concern and input. 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m. LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk ATTEST: Mayor 2 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION GOALS & OBJECTIVES "4# TRAFFIC IMPACT SOLUTIONS APRIL 6, 1999 r CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chang called the meeting to order at 4:20 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Room CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Herrera, Huff, Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor and Mayor Chang. Council Member Herrera arrived at 4:25 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor arrived at 5:34 p.m. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director; Lynda Burgess, City Clerk; Rose Manela, Assistant Civil Engineer; Kellee Fritzal, Assistant to the City Manager and Anne Haraksin, Administrative Assistant. A. GOALS & OBJECTIVES: C/Ansari believed the City should have an architectural review committee or increase the Planning Commission by two members with one member being a planner and one member being an architect. There have been project approvals in the City that she is not happy about and it is time the City makes this critical change. C/Huff concurred with C/Ansari and asked that staff make its recommendations as to how this might be accomplished. Council asked staff to schedule an appropriate Friday in May for a Strategic Planning Session. C/Ansari asked why it appears that the grass and plants are dying in the center medians on D.B. Blvd. from Grand Ave. to Lorbeer Middle School. CSD/Rose explained that when it gets too cold, the Lantana goes dormant and must be replanted. C/Ansari said she has received complaints from several community members who tell her that the water from the medians is flowing into the street. She asked what the cost of a drip system would be. CSD/Rose responded that a drip system does not work on turf. There are underground saturation systems that are specifically designed for turf areas. The City has looked at those systems before. However, the technology has developed APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 2 COUNCIL STUDY SESSION over the years and staff is receiving updated information with respect to current systems. C/Ansari asked CSD/Rose to contact the owner of Modern Irrigation in Upland. M/Chang asked CSD/Rose to check the water timing system Gose to D.B. Blvd. on Grand Ave. because someone complained that there is too much water and it runs down the street. M/Chang stated the Council's 1999-2000 Goals & Objectives will be placed on the April 20 Council meeting agenda for action. B. TRAFFIC IMPACT SOLUTIONS: Rich Barretto, Linscott Law & Greenspan, stated that the purpose of the study was to identify the possible origin and destination of traffic within the City that has access to Grand Ave. and D.B. Blvd. The boundaries of the study extend to Longview Dr. and Golden Springs Dr. Data counts were conducted in November and December, 1998 along Grand and D.B. Blvd. In early February, intersection traffic counts were conducted at 14 public street intersections, of which 8 or 9 are signalized. He stated that if the Council's goal is to solve problems for the residents of D.B., converting the curb lane to a through lane improves traffic and lessens congestion, which benefits everyone. If it is easy for commuter traffic to get through the system, the system improves and benefits those vehicles that are attempting to ingress/egress the side streets. He agreed with C/Huff that by making it easier for traffic to proceed more effectively through the City, it may attract additional traffic. By opening an additional lane of traffic on Grand Ave. at D. B. Blvd., traffic flow will improve. It is not known whether there would be an increased demand for use if the capacity of an intersection is improved. The increase will not come from D.B. traffic, it will come from cut -through traffic. Two of the traffic enhancement options previously considered were: 1) Restriping and converting the right turn lanes into through lanes, and, 2) widening the approaches to the intersections so that the right turn lanes were pushed further into the shopping centers which would provide the benefit of an additional through lane as well as maintaining the right tum lane. The first alternative is cost-effective and the second alternative is significant. He reminded the Council that there would be additional costs with respect to interruption of affected businesses which could outweigh the construction and right- of-way costs. His firm is seeking direction from the Council. The traffic counts confirm that about two-thirds of the morning traffic lineup on northbound Grand Ave. is related to Chino Hills traffic. Similarly in the p.m. hours, the opposite is true. He asked if the Council wanted to increase capacity. C/Huff pointed out that Chino Hills is only about 60% built out and if that is the direction in which the traffic is coming from, then the assumption is that the additional residents will operate in the same work and traffic pattern methods that currently exist. Additionally, the dairy preserve is being planned out in Ontario. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 3 COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Edison Ave./Grand Ave. extends through the head of the preserve and no major arterials have been developed in the area to accommodate the traffic to the 91 and 60 freeways. Given those factors, it follows that cut -through traffic will increase on D. B. streets. Steve Sasaki pointed out that restriping does not involve a considerable amount of money and is a feasible option. He responded to C/Ansari that, in consideration of Council's goal, he would recommend that the City consider restriping at this time to help with the traffic flow in the short term. He further recommended that if the Council decides to restripe, that the City work with the shopping center owners to improve the shopping center accesses prior to restriping. If, at a later time, Council determines that it wants to return to the current condition of the streets, there would still be improved access to the shopping centers. Under this scenario, Council needs to decide if it wants to put monies toward the improvement of shopping center driveways. C/Huff asked what Mr. Sasaki would advise if the major goal is to improve the traffic for D.B. residents. DPWD/Liu stated that, in addition to restriping, the improvement of the signal timing along Grand Ave. would give the residents shorter cycle lanes. In response to M/Chang, Mr. Sasaki indicated that the estimate for construction and added right-of-way is $100,000 per approach exclusive of impacts to the adjacent businesses. This may be an appropriate time to begin acquiring some of the right- of-way as redevelopment occurs. C/Huff requested data regarding the impacts of the carpool lanes since it appears that the institution of these lanes has taken some of the traffic off of the streets. In response to M/Chang, Mr. Sasaki further indicated that if Council is looking for an option to increase traffic flow, the logical first step is restriping because of the minimal cost. It makes sense to have a long-term plan to preserve added right-of- way or dedication when property recycles. In general, when there is an attempt to increase traffic flow, special markings such as "Keep Clear" should be reserved for special situations such as fire station entrances, etc. C/Herrera stated that she wanted to move the traffic through the City efficiently and wanted to discourage cut -through traffic. Her concern is that if the City makes it easier for traffic to flow through the area, more traffic will come to the City. Four Corners is working on a study which is considering an alternative route and if D. B. facilitates better traffic flow, how will that impact the study. At the same time, she did not want to do anything that will harm the City's businesses. Residents are frustrated. "If we make it easier for residents, do we also make it easier for more vehicles to come through the City from San Bernardino, etc?" APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 4 COUNCIL STUDY SESSION C/Huff stated that, clearly, the traffic problems started when Grand Ave. was opened up to the South. M/Chang said that businesses are perversely influenced by the traffic. In addition, the residents are very frustrated because they cannot reach the businesses during the p.m. peak hours. Last week, Ontario approved building 31,000 houses within the next 10 years, which will have a big impact on the traffic in the area. According to the Four Corners study, a billion dollars will be needed to improve the area's infrastructure (north of 91, east of 57, west of 15 and south of 210) in order to maintain the current level of service. If the City does not proceed to make changes, it will be in trouble. Mr. Sasaki asked if Council is in favor of increasing the capacity of the intersection. C/Huff said he was not convinced that increasing the capacity of the intersection will add to the quality of life. As long as there is a seemingly infinite number of cars coming into the City, it does not seem to benefit the traffic situation. Mr. Sasaki indicated that perhaps the first consideration will be with the signal timing followed by consideration of restriping. He believed it was important to resolve the shopping center driveway situation first and then the City is prepared to try the restriping. If it turns out that there is no benefit, the intersection can be returned to its current striping. At the very least, the City will benefit from the signal timing and driveway improvements. C/Herrera indicated she would like to see an updated traffic count since the carpool lanes have been completed to determine if it has lessened the impact on the City's streets. MPT/O'Connor said her family has noticed a considerable lack of traffic on D.B. Blvd. since the first of the year and that they rarely have to stop at Grand Ave., whereas the traffic used to be backed up to Mountain Laurel Way. DPWD/Liu stated that staff will look at the latest information available regarding traffic counts. In addition, staff will begin to put together specific and quantified recommendations to present to Council for possible short term traffic solutions. C/Herrera asked DPWD/Liu to include projected costs in the recommendations. In response to M/Chang, DPWD/Liu reported that staff will provide its recommendations to Council the first week in May. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 5 COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 3. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Mayor Chang adjourned the Study Session at 5:50 p.m. to Closed Session. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk Michael Huls 1 J Evaluation of the Recommendations of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force Presented by: 3. Michael Huls, R.E.A. integrated Environmental Services GwrdinaW z J Recommendations of the SWSTF Residential Sector - incentive -based system, automated 3 -barrels for yard wastes, commingled recyciables, and refuse, select a single service provider, mandatory recycling provisions for multi -family residents, & educational outreach, but no disposal bans or fines Commercial/industrial Sector - Maintain the existing course: educational outreach, Incentive -based system, C&D debris recycling, waste audits, & waste prevention programs 3 J Current System • Semi -automated, unlimited pick-up for SERs • Bins and barrels for MFRs • Two permitted haulers, one in process • Open permit system with no City revenue • Rates in upper half of cost for County • City does not regulate rates 4 �] Existing Diversion • Ranges from 15% - 38% based on data • 24% of diversion originates from residents • 76% of diversion from business sector • 16 -gallon crate for SFR recycling • Home composting and educational outreach • No MFR provisions • Self -hauled waste major obstacle 5 J SRRE Programs • Commercial sector (bin -served) includes waste auditing, enhanced incentive -based rates, C & D debris recycling, education outreach, & code requirements • Residential sector (barrel -served) includes variable rates, commingled recyclables, yard waste collection, home composting, & code requirements 6 J Findings • Business programs underway per SRRE • Over 62% of waste disposed by residents • About 20% of waste is self -hauled • SFRs and MFRS (greatest potential) • Residential service can remain open • Landfill closures imminent • Rates can stay competitive through negotiation and/or bidding 7 J - SFR Sector Program • Maintain unlimited pick-up w/ surcharge is trend for over 200 CA cities Evaluation of the Recommendations of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force Michael Huls • 3 -barrel automated system workable • Incentives for prevention desirable • Yard waste, recyclables & refuse separation • Additional education needed 8 J MFR Sector Program • Mandatory provisions for apartments, town homes, & condos preferred rather than specified programs • Site-specific program left up to owner/manager • City reviews technical aspects & approves • Need for code changes g J Commercial Sector Program • Enhance existing incentive -based rates to encourage use of recycling services • Mandatory provisions required • Schedule expansion by December `99 • Need to develop A/B routing for smaller scale generators • Procurement guide & other technical advice • C&D debris recycling function of self -haul 10 J Implementation • Costs can remain reasonable • Start in May to implement programs can allow start-up by December'99 • Require further community input • Need for code changes • Council direction needed to implement system (three pathways) 11 J Implementation Pathways t No action on Task Force recommendations at this time 2 Implement Task Force recommended programs in exclusive environment a Implement Task Force recommended programs in non-exclusive environment 12 J Assume Implementation of Task Force Recommendations ... • Direct City staff to negotiate with existing permitted haulers for residential services on long-term permitted basis • If negotiations are unsuccessful, then go out to bid for residential services on long- term permitted or exclusive basis 13 J Comparison With Other Cities • Cities Vending toward automated pick-up • Increased diversion due to larger recycling containers • Yard waste to ADC single largest diversion program residentially • Cities reviewing "pay as you throw" systems for both R & C sectors • Interest in processing mixed wastes growing • More emphasis on commercial sector recycling Evaluation of the Recommendations of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force 2 40 e1 ➢ia do lws WfA s LOS ANGELES COMMITTEE April 5, 1999 Ms. Eileen R. Ansari Council Member 21660 E. Copely Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 Re: El Dia De Los Ninos: Celebrating Young Americans Dear Ms. Ansari: To be a part of history in the next millennium comes but once in a lifetime! Today the National Latino Children's Institute (NLCI) offers you such an opportunity Serving as the voice for Latino Children, the NLCI has begun a national initiative to celebrate April 30th as EI Dfa De Los Ninos. A day for the children is already celebrated throughout Latin America, but not in the United States. The purpose of the day is to focus on uplifting Latino children and all other children into the next millennium by declaring their own day of celebration. This task alone will require the help of thousands of organizations, children, families, individuals, officials, professionals, opinion makers, and small businesses ... in other words, the total national community. And you are invited to be a part of this process. It is our hope that EI Dia De Los Ninos will become more than just another celebration. We intend for this day to draw communities together around building places where children can grow up safe and healthy. We believe that EI Dia De Los Ninos offers a venue for parents to connect with their children, for schools to connect with their students, and for cities to include youth in their structure and planning. We are delighted that on October 9th, 1998, the U. S. Senate unanimously passed a resolution declaring April 30th El Dia 648 SOUTH INDIANA STREET . LOS ANGELES, CA 90023 .(323) 268-1107 111 e1 ➢ia do los WtA s LOS ANGELES COMMITTEE De Los Nir%s. A similar resolution is currently before the U. S. House of Representatives. I was very fortunate to be included by Rebeca Barrera, President of NLCI, as a member of the Los Angeles Host Committee. As a member of the education sub -committee, it is my task to inform local school boards and officials with which I have been involved regarding this important issue. You are well known as a respected professional and City Council member in our community and champion of children's rights. As a teacher myself, I feel obligated to work toward the best possible future of all children. 1 believe that supporting this Resolution is a step in a positive direction. The City of Pomona issued a Proclamation on April 5th. The Clty of Los Angeles issued it's Resolution on March 26th. The Los Angeles School District Board of Education passed a resolution on March 9th in support of this issue. The California State Assembly will be receiving a resolution this week for its consideration from Nell Soto. The California State Senate will receive a resolution for consideration next week. I was pleasantly pleased to meet you this evening at the Pomona City Council meeting. I was there to hear the adoption of their city's Proclamation supporting EI Dia de los Ninos. Just as my husband, Ron Kosinski, has worked to improve our city's physical environment, it is my mission to elevate the status of children in our community by giving them a voice. 1 hope that the Diamond Bar City Council will pass this or a similar resolution to support giving a day of celebration to the children of Diamond Bar this year and in the future. I hope this will be on the agenda of the next City council meeting. 648 SOUTH INDIANA STREET . LOS ANGELES, CA 90023 . (323) 268-1107 []I e1 Dia do les MAO -S LOS ANGELES COMMITTEE Thank you for offering to put this issue on the Diamond Bar City Council agenda. I have included a variety of materials for your edification. It is my personal hope that we can teach children that their voice is important and will be heard, I want children to know how to appropriately speak in all forums. I also want to give the community and individual families a venue to uplift and honor their children. A celebration will be held in downtown Los Angeles to celebrate the signing of the Los Angeles Resolution. Mayor Riordan will march with about 450 children from Olvera Street to City Hall, followed by a press conference with officials and media. The children will then be treated to entertainment and activities as well as lunch by McDonalds. This is just one of 10 major city celebrations throughout the United States. I will be taking about 100 children from Pomona and have reserved space for children from our school district as well. I am hoping that Superintendent Ronald Hockwalt will decided to send some children to represent our community as well. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 397-4747 or at (909) 598-8800 at home. I look forward to speaking with you again regarding this issue. Thank you for you kind consideration to this matter. Sincerely, Kris Kosinski Enc. 648 SOUTH INDIANA STREET . LOS ANGELES, CA 90023 . (323) 268-1107 Dia de los Ninos Senate .Keso_ution HoM" Dia dry Los Ninos Designating the 30th day of April of 1999, as "Dia de los Nirios: Celebrating Young Americans", and for other purposes. (Introduced in the Senate) SRES 278 IS 105th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 278 (Designating the 30th day of April of 1999, as 'Dia de los Nifios: Celebrating Young Americans', and for other purposes.) IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES September 16, 1998 Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DODD, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. BOND, Mr. KERRY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary RESOLUTION (Designating the 30th day of April of 1999, as 'Dia de los Ninos: Celebrating Young Americans', and for other purposes.) Whereas many of the nations throughout the world, and especially within the Western hemisphere, celebrate 'Dia de los Niftos' on the 30th of April, in recognition and celebration of their country's future --their children; Whereas children represent the hopes and dreams of the citizens of the United States; Whereas children are the center of American families; Whereas children should be nurtured and invested in to preserve and enhance economic 1/ 99 http://www.nici.orglactivity/dianinosres.htm Dia de .os Ninos Senate .Keso_uuon prosperity, democracy, md the American spirit, Whereas Latinos in the United States, the youngest and fastest growing ethnic community in the nation, continue the tj adition of honoring their children on this day, and wish to share this custom with the rest of the Nation,- Whereas ation; Whereas one in four Americans is projected to be of Hispanic descent by the year 2050, and there are now 10.5 million :' atino children; Whereas traditional Latino family life centers largely on its children; Whereas the primary teachers of family values, morality, and culture are parents and family members, and we rel} on children to pass on these family values, morals, and culture to future generations; Whereas more than 500,000 children drop out of school each year and Hispanic dropout rates are unacceptably high; Whereas the importance of literacy and education are most often communicated to children through family members; Whereas families should be encouraged to engage in family and community activities that include extended and elderly family members and encourage children to explore, develop confidence, and pursue their dreams; Whereas the designation of a day to honor the children of the Nation will help affirm for the people of the United States the significance of family, education, and community; Whereas the designation of a day of special recognition of children of the United States will provide an opportunity to children to reflect on their future, to articulate their dreams and aspirations, and find comfort and security in the support of their family members and communities; Whereas the National Latino Children's Institute, serving as a voice for children, has worked with cities throughout the country to declare April 30 as 'Dia de los Nifios: Celebrating Young Americans' --a day to bring together Latinos and other communities nationwide to celebrate and uplift children; and Whereas the children of a nation are the responsibility of all its citizens, and citizens should be encouraged to celebrate the gifts of children to society --their curiosity, laughter, faith, energy, spirit, hopes, and dreams: Now, therefore, be it Resolved That the Senate designates the 30th of April of 1999, as 'Dia de los Nu1os: Celebrating Young Americans' and requests that the President issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to join with all children, families, organizations, communities, churches, cities, and States across the Nation to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies, beginning April 30, 1999, that include -- (1) activities that center around children, and are free or minimal in cost so as to encourage and facilitate the participation of all our citizens; (2) activities that are positive, uplifting, and that help children express their hopes and dreams; ..>., - . - (3) activities that provide opportunities for children of all backgrounds to learn about one another's cultures and share ideas; niel.org/activity/dianinosres.htm 1/ U/yy Jia c.e ..os .N mos Senate _ ,eso_ution (4) activities that include all members of the family, and especially extended and elderly family members, so as to promote greater communication among the generations within a family, enabling children to appreciate and benefit from the experiences and wisdom of their elderly family members; (5) activities that provide opportunities for families within a community to get mquai�ted; and ( 6) activities that provide children with the support they need to develop skills and confidence, and find the inner strength --the will and fire of the human spirit --to make their dreams come true. Introduced and Co-sponsored on September 16, 1998 by the following Senators. 1. Hatch, R - UT 2. Bingaman, D - AZ 3. Hutchison, R - rX 4. Daschle, D - SD 5. McCain, R - AZ 6. Boxer, D - CA 7. Domenici, R - NM 8. Dodd, D - CT 9. Abraham, R - MI 10. Harkin, D - IA 11. Bond, R - MO 12. John Kerry, D - MA 13. Grassley, R - IA 14. Landrieu, D - LA 15. Chafee, R - RI 16. Lautenberg, D - NJ 17. Mikulski, D - MD 18. Moseley -Braun, D - IL 19. Reid, D - NV Additional Co-sponsors after September 16, 1998 include: 20. Kennedy, .D - MA 22. Murray, D - WA 21. Feinstein, D - CA 23. Graham, D- FL [Home] [ About NLCI IThe Agenda ( Dia de Los Ninos I Milagro I La Promesa ] [ EI Futuro NewsletterI La Tienda I Calendar I About You I Web Links I FA ] National Latino Children's Institute 1412 West` Sixth Street Austin, Texas 78703-5139 Phone 512.472.9971 Fax 512.472.5845 E-mail: nica@inetport.com Copyright O 1998 NLCI. All rights reserved. Revised,` October 07, 1998. http://www.nlci.org/activity/dianmosres.htm 1/10/99 National Latino Children's Institute Los Angeles Chapter Guiding Principles Organizations that make a commitment to establish El Dia de Los Ninos in their , community must adhere to certain values that promote e celebration ual activities benefiting Whether activities are elaborate citywide events or small only a few children at a hospital, they must be appropriate and uplift children. The following principles can be used as a guide to measure the suitability of a proposed El Dia de los Ninos activity. ❖ Children and youth must be at the center of the event. ••• The activity must be positive and uplifting to young Latinos from the community. It • should welcome all children and create opportunities for children of different ethnic groups to get to know each other's culture. ••• The activity should make children happy, improve self-esteem, pride, etc. • • The activity should be inclusive of family and others. It must promote family unity and incorporate the extended family. The activity should involve parent S` participation. ❖ Products used for the activity must be child -safe and positive. ••• Although children from the community can participate in the making of banners, • murals, or other artistic items, no product manufactured in violation of child labor laws, including imported products, can be used. •'•• The activity is planned with respect for the diversity of the community, including the various ethnic, cultural, racial, and religious groups. ••• The activity is respectful of the environment and results in cleaner, safer spaces for • children. ❖ The activity results in a positive learning experience for all who participate. ❖ Whenever possible, participation should not have a cost. ❖ Children from the community should participate in every aspect of activity coordination. ••• Ways parents can take advantage of benefits available in the community. ❖ Encourage parent education and participation. ❖ The value.of language + Achieve participation. ee The activities should not be gentler biased. Los Angeles (Ammod School District Resolution Whereas, Children are, the center of the Family unK; Where"? Fal"mes should bane an astablishad day to vulva their children and celebrate their childhood; Where", Fammes, commummes and the generations that follow are committed to prodding a positive famug, social and educational environment for childran; Whereas, "El Dia de los riiAW will serve to bring attention to issues related to children including poverty, abusa, illlteracg and safety; and W*ereasj. This day will bring communities nationwide to celebrate and upl%ft children and ensure they are first in our lives and have a future in the next millenium; now, tberefere, be it Resolved? That the Beard of Education of the Ciy of Los Angeles declare April 30, 1999, as "El Dia de los Mass," throughout the distr%t; and be it Resolved furtber, That the Superintendent be directed to urge schools to participate in acttvmas to prol"ote 'tel Dia de les Htfies." Passed March 9, 1999, after explanation by Fee de In Torre of CASE. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Pro Tem O'Connor and Councilmember Herrera FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, April 20, 1999 DATE: April 15, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated April 20, 1999. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to its entry on the Consent Calendar. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF EiIAMOND BAR VOVCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated Pp'�/l W. 1999 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment' Payments are hereby allowed fro, the following funds in these ammunts FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID VOUCHERS TTAL 001 GENERAL FUND 81p,024.85 158,340.51 977,365'36 256 96 256.96 010 011 LIB�ARY COM ORGANIZAT�ION SERVICES SUPPORT . 00 17,000.00 ` .00 17,000'0� 112 PRCP A - TR�NSIT FUND .0O 53,042.51 53`042,51 118 AIR QLTY IMPR FD (AB2766) .00 80.50 80.50 125 �OM ZEV BLK GRANT FU 11,174,76 11_i74,76 126 CITIZENS OPT-PUBq LIC SFTY .00 488,20 488'20 138 LLAD #38 FUN3 .00 4,833.00 4,833.00 139 LLAD #39 FUND .00 3,703.17 3,703.17 1:41 FUND '00 212.06 212.06 141 250 LIM) CAPITAL IMPROV/PROJ FUND .00 243.86 243.86 REPORT FOR ALL FUNDS uit'S 5 232,375.53 1,06~,.00^3- APPF Finance Director Mayor Pr� Tem ------------------------ ------------- tj city Manager Councilm�m�er RUN' DATE' 04/1611991? 10:2`7:00 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT A'l EQUlPMEMT KENTALS DR. ��lFI.�G 001-238O2 ' ACCURATE LA�JSCAPE 00���1-4221�- 1��538 �21C' VV15316-42210— OOL531S 42210-- 00L538'422\V— L385538-��1U- 1395539'�21V- 1415541-4220- 00\5328'��|V- 0315319'4221V' V015328'42210- OO\53\3-422\0' VO�5322-422LV-' ��L5319'42210' 00153l8 -4221O'' AEl CASC Fhl, TNEE�l*G 01521O'4�2�C - uTRTSUCH �U�� CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER DUE THRU. 04.1120/19919 PO# INIV�� DESCRIPTION ��� 8448 01^359465'03 TRUCK RENTAL'FOOD F�-�Ny �T���I� TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE V[�OOR 4936� �CURlT� Y SF.'SUMMlTRI�� T0� ��AI� TOTAL VOUED-ER'_3 T --A U� PAGE : 1 PREPAID DATE CHECK 40.2t'- .VV 4 0.26 � 50^� 5O.� 75.'--6l.":, D0.R 6 '-'c 4..q \7.86 2 3 2' D7.18 �2.06 [9.� 25 0.00 �.05 341.70 17O.86 1':-2D0.81':- 1 7-1 7-1 2,742.42 792� PROF 5VC9 nc- .vv TOTN k 101�� TIT AL 1 '912 -H�� TOTAL�B�l� ��V01"C"HEPS TOTAL 6.76'��/35-D, 6.78 '`- 6.78 f.NDRE CAMW O01 4V_ RECREA ION KEFUNC %J.VO VV 77P���� . TCTAL V0JOHEKS 320.00 TCTAL DU� :ENDOR 320.OV A- -kiM���-�-,.-�f-�l,CYN 01��A ADDNLMAINT MAR-DI",38 O�90V3A ADDN� MAINT AP -E HILL ADDNL AR.TAGE 0�9003A ADDNL h" TN' Mar'SYCw CYN �w: NL MT-�AR,''fit APLE HL ADDNLMAINT-MAR.'DIST.38 All0NL MAINIT 'MAR,'DIST,39 ADDNL MAlNT-MAR-DIST.41 �DDNL MAIMT-MAR.'SUM IM17RDG ADDN- MAlNT'MAR.-DIST.39 !Ni MAINT-MAR.'PETERS0N O190O3A ADDN� MAINT �-R-SUMMTRDGE n\9003A ADDNL MAIN! :AR -HERITAGE 019003u ADDN� MAIN- MAR -F` REAGAN V1 ADDNL MAINT MAR -PETERSON ADD�L MAINT'MAR.'PANTERA T0�� PREPA�DS TOTAL VOUCHEB TOTAL CUE VENDOR PAGE : 1 PREPAID DATE CHECK 40.2t'- .VV 4 0.26 � 50^� 5O.� 75.'--6l.":, D0.R 6 '-'c 4..q \7.86 2 3 2' D7.18 �2.06 [9.� 25 0.00 �.05 341.70 17O.86 1':-2D0.81':- 1 7-1 7-1 2,742.42 792� PROF 5VC9 nc- .vv TOTN k 101�� TIT AL 1 '912 -H�� TOTAL�B�l� ��V01"C"HEPS TOTAL 6.76'��/35-D, 6.78 '`- 6.78 f.NDRE CAMW O01 4V_ RECREA ION KEFUNC %J.VO VV 77P���� . TCTAL V0JOHEKS 320.00 TCTAL DU� :ENDOR 320.OV CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE D4jlb/tti3 fU:27:f:F. VOUCHER T,EG,v7 PAGE: 2 DUEL THRU * '54 /2' _' i 194'-' FGA+D/SECT-ACCT-FF,DJECT-ACCT -',� # INVGICE uESCF,IrT.GN PREPAID AMOUNT DATEI CHIE CK Pt TTY HINT -- I T--.1 0015 _.5 i-441{.-- _ P c C`.n,4 _ _ r 40. 00 . =TAL , SEPAIDS TOTAL VGUIICH -VF N-i0t: F. APAMO 001A':ji'.-'y_ii-- liffAMO .-U+: A° 4+.^: :--- - r_ r. 1 Yii?I�!ii'. DUE T,Tp! --EPAIDS .00 TOTAL VLi '_HERS T-" n- 00 ISMA I AFASTU 011- 3 47r0,-- DECrrAiID'. 15 0 00 CTRL PREF'AIlS „ fU ra'rF: TOTAL � � CH� F. ... 1C it_i,t){; '-TAL DUE VEND F-, P -M -_'d I ROU --u!§= _LTSkpJ,, �_- ...-. MAR r(!�F''i'�S PLNN-S-RCH -- TOTAL ,t)cr TOTAL VOUCHERS 1°air,i;1; TOTAL DUEiU-T-iir - �, �i 1,59.0 h li:., - MNTH, E-, -.�, L SVCS- �� -: PHONE 16.67 i :'- - - 225- - LUNG DISTANCE PHONE CHGRS 1c, $4 9.84 0014440-44212,51— SVCS-EOC CELLPHONE 16.47 MNTHLY SVC -1 -HOC CELLPHONE 20.97 O044' l -42'125 -- LONG D1ST.PHONE CHARGES 42. ?r--. TOTAL PREPAIDS {fir TOTAL V"iCHERS 29.01 TOTAL DUE VENDOR T: TLE!'- .� _. qji ---- REHi_iFTt i F= DJUGE TRC'': PR.EF',DC .UU �� 'dOi�CHEf;S -- „i lz 121.96 U" i;ig',c '?5'_4 Iq moi} . TUTL-- 1,._ _ T.,� _.,_ .•c`iJiJF; 1:x.9:: CD� [_GJAMGND�� DATE*. 04/16/199' 1��27�00 VO�CHER ��lSTER PAGE� 3 PREPA ID F�0/SECT'ACCT'PROJECT-�CC PO # AHOUNI T DATE CHECx MICIP.AEL BRANDMAPN� ASSrCCI--.7B lN" 001'23V10'' PROF.SVCS FPL Y4'0O6 1,196.1O O01-23O10'- PROF.SVCS ' FPL 94-003 2.16O.77 00\'23VL0' R0F.SVCS FP L 94"10 2`84�.37 OO1-230� PROF.SV�5 F�� 94-O25 954.02 TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL v����R8 ' 7.154.26 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7.154.2� BUY COM 001�095-412VO'' 8�2� 8729�3 COMPUT[P SUPPLIES-COM&�T 477.6V rOTAL PRF��DS .0V TOTAL V�UCHER3 477.6V T07 AL DUE 477.60 CALVARY CHPP�EL/POM0NA O01-23002- 49413 PARK SECURITY DEPOSIT 50.00 TOTAL PREPAlDS .0� TOTAL VOUCHERS 510. 01,", TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 CAPlO 14 O0O95-��15- 8555 CAPIO MBRSHP-KAJlWR/�AMYA T%TAL PREPAlDS '0O T�TAL YOUCHERS 250.00 TOrAL DUE VENDOR �W.00 C��ER TRAK VO153�O 4234O-- 850C WOR�SHOP-M.ROA 5/6/99 99.00 ��TAL PREPAIDS .V0 TO O0 TOTAL �UE V[NDOR Y9.0O C��n�-ES ABB2Tr AGSJ�lATES I�C PRD;.�VCS'PAVE�wT FY9�-97 493.50 C��5�58 ��|O 77S8 ��l%T S�CS-TRE� :..,.T NG 112555� 45527 T78C MAl�T SVCS �US SHBZER 4OO 7r33 Ml�%T �vCS'aEED ���L'�� 5,656.35 OO15558'455h8- 7C7AL PRE�'AIDS .VO 8 O83 37 T04� VCi�HER� TO7AL �� VEN�5R _ . 8,V83.37 �Iu� N)L'S47B�-' p��E4��O� REFUND \55.O0 TOTAL PREPAlDS .VO TOTAL VOUCHS rOTA� �UE YENDO� 155.O0 CHINO HI! 1S FORD OO14V90-422O0'' 8582 2:7412 E�CS FO� 9T TAURUS 323.89 T8TAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOG[HERS 323.89 Tn7AL DUE YENDOR 323.89 CDY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN, DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 4 0���- 04/210/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT P0 # INVOICE AMOUNT DATE CHECK ClNTAS CORPORATION 0015310-42130—. MAlNT STOFF �FRM-WK 3/2Y 19.47 0O\5318 -42i30— MAlNT STGFF UNFRM'WK 3/22 . 15.47 001531O'421�+' ' MAlNT STGFF UNFRM'WK 4/V5 . 19.47 TOTAL PREPAlDS .O; TOTAL VOUCHERS 58.41 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 58.41 CITY OF CERRlTOS O0140 42325 - GO��VS DINNER'COUNCl�/CM 397.4` TOTAL PKEPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 397.48 T2JAL �� VENDOR 397.48 CO�0%lTY I�D��TR�ES 7545 LITTER ABATEMENT'MARCH, Y9 83f.44 0O1555S 45503'' T�rAL PREPAlDS .00 TOTAL -,n-, TOTAL D�E YE��� 839.44 COMMUNlT� SPAKKS 85\9 CONCERT SC�DL LISTING 6V.00 OO�535�-453O5'' T�7AL PREPAIDS .0V TOTAL VOUC*ERS 6O.OV TCTAL �E VENDOR 6 0 0Ol4��O'44�\V- 779� AUDlTlw0 SYCS'FY9O/99 �.25V.0V �01405O-44O10' Svc, 8573 AUDlT�NG S-�Y�8/99 484.O0 T2�Ai PREPAIDS '0V T��AL vOUC*E�S 1,734.00 TDT�� DUE VE��[� 1734.O0 —.7--:-�Z �,lv��~ GEn'.'LLE T�AL l� .vv TDTAL V����RS TOTAL DUE 35.00 JU%E CK�3ELL �ECREA-�Om REFUNJ ��.00 �OTAL P�EPAI�5 .O0 TOTAL VOUCHERS 56,0V O01'3473�' RE�REATlON �EF�m� 49.0O PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOCCHERS 47.OV TOTAL DUE VE��P �9.0V -' "iZ. 14:.4 °�GH.Nr,-rttl -'Q °... rc A F?I ._ f tf ILi�L ;�K�ry _ AL V:7uCHERu e9 TOTAL DUE VEN7I:O', iIAt'J.,I BAR AYS;T kali, f - LO 1{ C ITY SUPPORT 'U4/20/1999 35447 TOTAL'REF'i"IDS 000.00 TOTA_ VOUCHERS ,i;E; TOTAL ',"P v:Mo'- L'i'l ACIOND, CHAMBER nD�F CnOmMrEnt�- 0014vif)-413 — - I�iSTLTs.-., ,.- �_ 210.100 0:l:0J1`+''a TOT �.l CHt ; =._ j N - .. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR R'GN DATE: W1Sr17`79 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER RACE: DUE THRUI: 04/20!14y4 FUND/SECT -ACCT -RFDJET-AT nE _T_-iPION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK DhY °. NTE COPY 0 E ' :444 F`F.t'.;TjN3 _. _ Dr _ _ TOTAL V0°li CC PIS: 38 ; «f DUE -NDOP 4 E-LbAY EAS-r:2-F'AR T IAL RY T $70.1c (if R= TOTAL DUE > r'-,,SO�. � v IDI, "i' • 1'= DEITY �'_'wT4- 497,47 VIDUEHERS T; iTA ::.0 EN LN .. _ .. 57 .. Ji r :- . 7Crh.;:�i �'1`l ��� _li fR�n _DV._ :l,00 •�(!l;„_ is `it i0 1 71 -' "iZ. 14:.4 °�GH.Nr,-rttl -'Q °... rc A F?I ._ f tf ILi�L ;�K�ry _ AL V:7uCHERu e9 TOTAL DUE VEN7I:O', iIAt'J.,I BAR AYS;T kali, f - LO 1{ C ITY SUPPORT 'U4/20/1999 35447 TOTAL'REF'i"IDS 000.00 TOTA_ VOUCHERS ,i;E; TOTAL ',"P v:Mo'- L'i'l ACIOND, CHAMBER nD�F CnOmMrEnt�- 0014vif)-413 — - I�iSTLTs.-., ,.- �_ 210.100 0:l:0J1`+''a TOT �.l CHt ; =._ j N - .. CITY OF LIA'IJN BAF; RUN DATE: 04,`16i1' -'?9 10:17:0% 'VOUC'HER REGI_=ER PAGE: 6 nj: THP' 0412f),"95' PREPAID FUNr,'SECT-ACCT -PRO.;ECT-ACCT F'D # 1N.'OiCE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHEC„ DiAMON'= BAR CHTf—SvE ACE.=Tr I'lF 11_!1114'1: 4`,0=-- C7" :: U'P..RT ... r = :42_ TOTAL PREF.!, =' TOTAL '.'000HE-' TOTAL CUE YENr.OF T DIA�OND G ^,- - OF TnE L._=.CRY f' AMM t. -IT C...-. ��f1.�'' lc , .;t rIQ;'?C, i Q ^�34y T=TAL =,_`'AIDE ir' `, la A TOT''`' VGU�CF,,E. _ ,:: , L T AL DUE VEND -CF'. - , ;!C) • �!(! thE`s1i ii`a^_'_f.: 25 . LF4H,. R �{ -- 4yANTEF - iNr ={ TCT�L F,EFAI=!'F n i Ir TOTAL ENT _— VENT—` .t r : ril t:li'di '. L.. F'KM yTtu, �`R•- ',,; .�}�.' 04%x. 1.. v_2-".._. . )500,(!6 Tf_TAL FREPAiDS .:, TOT CIO TCTP:L i'E VENDOR 00 DIAMOND BAR, r"O IL 0314,`0-42-;11';-- MA RCH FUEL - CITY MANAGER 61.50 MARCH FUE1 - COMMUNITY SVC5 1`x;.6,5 TOTAL PREPAIDS: .00 TOTAL ."UCHERS 55.15 �" TOTAL DUE VENDOR, 155 15 ND BAR PET`Y CASH RECRE, �1„ S! �p IT O. , _ ;�IE S ., �°, 6`;.66 Flair.,.,,^r _ P;!e, ;; ATI!C .�: 50.00 C, k! E.r.'.,-OUPF'_IEE „-: .RI +''-""= `=-- •"2-T __`RI:_ MEE TI, ':j _ --°(viCIES 57.51 h!d"EF'T(_1 4. 4._ _ __rLAi`di"+iwG - :,__ EIEC= q. tiEL%'v:J:i Tl- I�—.H LTJ i� 9.qi% 4;=: .: 'TnT Z7 7 VOU TOTAL 50 ?C:C Ttjr i;=.7 nRt; i. r_•TEp F;_,i_tp r.74 i�.- - .._ TO At F`r"rI Ota: CITY OF DIAMOND FA=: RU$1 LATE: 04/16/1:+99 10:27:00 VOUCHEF' REGISTtF; PAGE: 7 DUE THRU: PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-F'RO,lECT-ACCT F'O # INiiCE DE5CRIF'TI0N AMOUNT NATE CHECK DIAMOND RAF'. R.ELEVELOWt:,.TAGEtC +' l'' ADI.ANCE-VE PARTNERS IJU(, 7- i.0:' 04/..:'/1;a:' WT414 r^-fPREF-All--Si 70Q it TOTi l VOUCHEF:C T 0 T '!L D��E v'EN_�Dh ,:lfli_i,i I0 BAR fr:; NU ym i•.utii.� � I : WHL� f f H ' COPt"liJtd T'i SUP ORT 7i,;l,ii1 04/20/1909;5344 001-,-0,02 -- 411 SECURIT` DEP.-HERITAGE F}:. 12.;•_2 (- _'r Lft4lJHif1 flll,A l.: LU lal,I-•.E 'vl•E13 FROiL •.�,VT. Tu l AL HRtFAIDS , i i l TOTAL VOUCHERS 4. r,0 .,<<; s O T AL 1UE VENDOR 8,046.50 DIAMOND PHOTO 0014095-42112-- 17_ 4.l,?ll L PHOTO DEVLF 41.43 TOTAL F'REFAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 41.43, TOTAL LUE VENL'OR 41.4'.-i i Er5IFIED F`ARATV —L T IivC 112555-49525 4/,. DIA, ,.:.t�L _ :j;�-1_ 1'),462.4: TuiAL : R„FAII'C ,CIO r,- - - G S T� AL v;;U'_HE. 10 , 46:L 49 j^' .,q.,,:.� `.1• a—..i4:-- - - __ r -:1i [: LIF _ tih ML —.. F �`. tiv'xi4 R: . Iy7.Vt) J ICTAL Mia-:_ _. ._.40 TA'. �__ 'TnT Z7 7 VOU TOTAL 50 ?C:C Ttjr i;=.7 nRt; i. r_•TEp F;_,i_tp r.74 i�.- - .._ TO At F`r"rI Ota: CITY OF DIAMO;dD BAR FUN DATE: 04116(199' 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: _ PREPAID FUrID;CEC?-ACC?-PROJECT-ACC? PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK FEDERAL EXPRESS 4 {'02-76730 EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-134 12.75 001-2:iolo-- ;00120-- (x140-4. 4--7674ti EXPRESS MAIL-GENERAL GGIOJ E8i2 x";•2 5 001-2,3010-- 4-S02-7674;: EXPRESS MAIL-FPL 99-04 12.75 4-002-767, Sff) EXPRE S6 MAIL-FPL q'?-tir-,^; 12.75 001-2',rttl-- 4-802-76780 EXPRESS MAI'--PPLJJ—tiy '5.5i >� 4-'tit-767;t; EXPF,Ecc MAIL-RL 99-002 'OTAL PPFPAnc .Gsl T"TA.. L ','OUCH *_RE 1T-' • 7c DUE VENUOR 170.75 40. Of' >.. - - ='REYA - :. _ tit( 'rq 4C: i;il lEHICLL Do AL . _v ICTA fi7 c^ L Fr.( -nt --%s. - A; . - UiT T ; C4C�- - 46c.ti 2rL ,G. TO,,T 1A. j„ L .-_ .,-, 1�.,Ir.-e .-c =, - _ l-Il. - - tll HCS,"=: L .� OT JC•,� �� : .t1t - -- PREPAID do-�--- AYWNT DATE CHECK 14'2.`0 142' 50 142- 0.00 .00 :+ 4t.'a1 44.02': 1r$ cc DO ,I)I1 4:..__ V*� 4;T,{lri CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04i'1611999 10:27*0 VOUCHER REGISTER DUE TNS:U, 04,'z""111995'. FUIN ISE C I T_ RO i CT_A(a T PO # 1 NVO I C E DEC, IPITON DIP,NE GLADWEL_ 4 w.,: 4000- ,,.�. CON -- N O . ii'. TOTAL E'-:'EF`AID-- ^,T^; i 1 V EPS TOTAL ' .:-_ cV tai ia'i( %. %'. PRG-._rC:S-L=�:-r MYL-M P. -ITA' r='EFA ;'- TOTAL VC. CHEF. AL T 0- 77 Di_c vEfaTOR T; TQ: -:CCN -^-C -,H. C,_.:7-P,in'dYL, ,C:EHUei°'i Ar;- qua.. .._ Y�-. U rl . 'OT _,j , r_,Irrucoc l'ONF—r HERRERA t!— Tr;TAL F;F,^p, TrjC TOTAI- V0UC:HE-'- Tf1TAL illi V' END,I]F, - -- PREPAID do-�--- AYWNT DATE CHECK 14'2.`0 142' 50 142- 0.00 .00 :+ 4t.'a1 44.02': 1r$ cc DO ,I)I1 4:..__ V*� 4;T,{lri CITY OF DIAMOND E:Ac' RUN UATE: 04/16)1999 10::J:00 VC' L:HER REGISTER FAGE: ii} DUE THr,^J i}4 il�'- i+�C'Pu , r : PREPAID # IPJVOIE DESvRIrPJ AMOUNT u>TE CH_��:. HICHIPS `iT �,�_h !C14/7 _ ; u� � S i; }1d)"J-4 111-- FZ146'T,; ' TOTAL rr-REFIi:= -�, --- VHS 1; — Vt U`:: -: , ENNIFER HOt",, 0""-:;47:x;!-- RECREAT:'ON 4E:L-D 6.G" TO HL F'Rt5 --Ai VOU- 56.00 " jT', DUE "j At OR cF r; -:_ rnrPi HvLr._.. MT) TnrA `' t 1-t ';n TOTi � 'VOUCHERS 411-1 0f 4C 00 01, 53i-�- 4 Ij-- -PETERSON PK II TOTAL PREF A IDel .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS ITAL DUE VEN OR HOME n1 -P 'T 1110618-16 MISC. SURF'LIES-PANTERA PK 171.37 TOTAL FREF'AIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 171.37 =:TAL DUF VENDOR 171.'37 iCiA -,E..=EEPT ;F:Uc;T-45- Uu i F 0 ,tlli Pi^:i ! d4 ; 3`-6 ALL 5 `i!6.;7 04/3. - F;__ :72; . _ ..1 y11, CITY OF DlAMONB BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 1i DUE THRU. 041120/1999 '��'��83'�� P0# INVOICEDB�lPT(� PREPAIDR��C ��� LATE CHECK. INLAND VALLEY BOC 0014095'42115'' FEGNL ECNMK SUMMT-SPNSRS - |.VV0.OV V4/2O/199Y 35369 TOTA/,EPAIO- TOTAL VOUCHER6 TOAL DUE VENDOR .0V 1.00O.0O lNTERNATl0NAL SERVI�� INC 0014411-454110' 7860 8397 CRSSlNG GUAPDO !VCS -MAR �9 7.427.70 TOTAL �PA �IDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS ' 7,422 7,70 T0�D���� 7`427.70 KATHRYN JOHNSON V01 -3474O - RECREATION REFUND 7.00 TOTAL PREPAlDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 7.01.1 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 7.00 KENS HARDWARE 0015331'42216 -' 75OO-OPEN MISC.SUPPLlES'SY[� CYN PK 16 V8 0015310'4��00'' 758V -OPEN PAM-`MlSC.SUPPLIES ' 53.85 O0153i8'4221V-' 750C,-OpEN MlSC.SUPPLIES-PANTERA PK 3.21 O0\5313-42218'' 758V -OPEN MlSC.SUPPLlE5-HEADAGE PK 17.28 TOT4L PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL YOUCHERS 90.42 TOTAL DUE VENDUR 9O.42 VALERlE KERNOHAN V01'34740-- RECREATIOm REFUND 7.0O TOTAL 2REPAlDS TOTAL VOUCHERS .O0 7.00 PO�E9 L KIR� TDTA'L DUE VENDOR 7.VO 0��'230O2 SE�URI7/ DEP'PANTERA PARK 2�O.0V TOTAL P�EPAIDS .0V TOT�� VOUCHER� 2;o.VO TOTAL DUE VEN3OR 2VV.00 �1EI��ELD[R �Z55215-44000— 8l20 �/6'3/5/99 PROF S�CS-�I�W[QU4 LN0SLD 5,288.Of. TOTAL AS '00 T0A V��� 5.2138.00 TOTAL DUE 1`0R 8.00 K�OX INDUST9IAL S�PLIES OO�5310'41200-- �37491 MISC.EQU�P 8AGS ClSPENSER 86.47 TO -AL RE . .00 TOTAL VOUC��S o6.47 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 86.47 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16V1999 0;27;00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 12 DUE THRU: 04/20'-/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK GEORGE KUO 0015210-44100— PLNG & COMlM.MTG-2/9'2/23 120.00 TOTAL PKEPAlOS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 120.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 120,00 PATRICK KWOI45 RE REPTREFUND 160.00 TOTAL PREP- I7S .00 TOTAL YOUCHERS 160.O0 TOTAL JUE VENDOR 160.00 SCARL[TT KWOND 001-34780'' RECREATI8* REFUND 4O.00 TOTAL PRE PAlILLS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 41j. 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40.00 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC O�158\8'4221O - O54V 187O27 REPLC EQUlP'PANTERA PK 207.2V TOTAL PREPAlDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 207.20 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 207.2V LASHEN ��/3OD6E 001409O'461VV- 8234 8712 DODGE PICKUP TRUCK -CO ENF 19.314.54 TOTAL P8EPAlDS .VV TOTAL VOUCHER3 19.314.54 TDTAL �l E VENDOR 19,3114.54 CATHY T LAYTO* O�1 230o2-' 4Y3Y2 SECURlTY 11EP'HERlTA8E PK 200.00 TOTAL PREPAlDS .00 T0AL VOUCHERS 20V.0 0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 2OO.VV LEAGUE OF CA CITI�Z OO�403V'42325 GEN M8RSHlP MTG-CMbR 25.00 04/20/1999 35354 0��4V�V 42325'' GEN NBRSHlP MTG'CNCL 71,00 04/20/1999 35354 TOTAL PKEPAlDS 96.0O TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR LEWIS ��RAVIMO I�C 001*VY0'42113 79O= 32577 ENGRVNG CCCA 17.32 0V15210'412OO-' 8�l 3233O SVCS PLAQUE -JOE "'-MANUS 61,70 VV14V90'42113— 7905 32428/3265O ENGRVNG �CS'O'OALY/STLWG 34.64 TOTAL PKEPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 113.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1.13.66 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTERDUE THRU: 04/20/1'7-99 PO# INVCITCE DESCRIPTION CAROL Ll VV1'34780 - RECREATION REFUND ,UTAL P*EPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL D'7_ VENDOR LlNSCQTT & GREEWSPAN 60155 I'j -4521— �� 2 YC0t��SI� �3667 jLN 99 -HELICOPTER SVCS CML44z1-45402— T�'�0���J�BR 0VO:'i C H Ir R S �2545 ' SEPT YG'�lICOPTER SVCS 0014411 -454O1 - TOTAL DUE VENTE—JR FES.99-HELICOPTBR SVCS L TY TOTAL PREPAIDS �125553'455S3- O5O� 3990425 MTA/JOlNT PASS -MARCH 99 11��53 45535' O506 399O425 CITY SU3STDY -MARCH 99 TOTAL PFF PAIDS TDTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL DUE VENDOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY PU8LIC ��KS SV�5331'453VO'' 7532 99000V�5403 SOMP PUMP MAINT'2/l'2/28 0O�55lV-45530- 7865 54O2 lNDUSTHlAL WASTE -FEB 99 0V15510-45507— 848 ROUTINE MAINT-JULY '518- 2 5 55 1 C! - 4 6 41 122 - I 8�95 TSTNG TRFFC SIGNAL VV15510'455O7-- 8484 1686 ROUTINE MAINT-SEPT 98 0V155�V-455O7— 8484 174' ROUTINE MAlNT-OCT 98 0O1551O-45507-- 8484 162 6 RJ�TINE MAlNT'AUGUST Y8 00�55�0-45507-- 84O� 1084 ROUTINE MAlNT-NOV Y7 VO�5510-45507' 8484 �806 ROUTINE MAINT'NOY 98 O015510'45507^- 84O4 |386 R8UTINE MA[NT-APR[L 98 OO15510-455O7-' 84O4 2�45 i0TIN`-' MAINIT'JAN Y9 0O1551�-4�@7-' 7866 2V45 ROUTINE :AlNT-JAN. 99 O015510-45507 ' 3434 21O5 RO�TINE HAlNT-FE8 99 O0�551V-45507-- 8484 12o5 ,OUT NE MAINT-JAN 98 O0\55\h-45507 8484 1266 ROUTINE MAlNT'FE8 98 8015510'45507--8�04 1145 POUTINE MA[NT'DEC 97 O015518 -455t7 8484 9t2 ROUTINE MAlNT'TRAFFIC TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS TOTAL Dc VENDOR 0��4U-45401- 1'.-)"j 14 DEC. 98 -HELICOPTER SVCS m)144U'45�V1— �3667 jLN 99 -HELICOPTER SVCS CML44z1-45402— T�'�0���J�BR �;�4411'454o1— �2545 ' SEPT YG'�lICOPTER SVCS 0014411 -454O1 - 13/o8 FES.99-HELICOPTBR SVCS TOTAL PREPAIDS TOTA: YUUCHERS T�TAL DUE VENDOR PAGE: 13 PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECY 'm 6,-.64 6,525,61 6,�5.64 0,24 |09.22 Z4'3.86 496.65 l.l19.75 8�.77 4�.� 1,3�7.44 76.7f) 4048.lL 765.25 ^55 55l.51 .00, 0.252.6V 19'252.6V 551.66, ��.0 1V.998'34 73 3.7 1,241.23 '~ 13.�9,04 13,��.04 CITY OF DIAMOND BAF: RUN DATE: 04/14%1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PACE: 14 DUE THRU: 04/20/1999 FUND/SECT—ACCT—PROJECT—ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK LR BACKHOE INC 001-34200-- REFUND! ISSUANCE FEES 1,305.00 04/2'001999 35350, RER ND °L'JMBING PERMITS 568.. I 01,4/20/1999 3'35S TOTtl TOTAL VOUCH=RS, ,raft T0,TAL ELE VENDD . 1,C2 7...00 IMA.NTE .�_ . JU HES, ''� C 341.E..= TA'_IUE V-.0 P.. it--�_ -I TRONI r3�' _._ c,.EC : ES ff•ia-• iy EnL!jP 1T PLCMT—HEwITAOE jj� TOTAL PREPAIDS O•J • j17 0ta TOTAL VOUCHERS E•3,=7 TOTAL DUE VENDOR I,3.57 RAUL MARTINEZ 001-23002-- PARI: SECURITY DEPOSIT 50.00; TOTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 JOE MCMANUIS 0015210-4410!:-- PLNG & COMM.MTO-2/9,2/23 1'0.00 T"TAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 120.00 1 !} TOTAL 1 AL DUE `'IEIN7,0i. 120, 00 L_LJ VOM"iL:.iRi* 14 SF_OF1 �50 .04 1210 ! -: f19f +t : TuTHL 2�s500,00 JCYU T.---A- Vrt,:fE[S TF- DUE -- `"'+ PAS=EE-: — MARCw 27 '45 _- Toll AL T LIS TOTAI nT 7.'I �Jp�� r ,F Jl 1P1F' 71 •J __ 1�. k'J t�.J._ '- 4 ` AL PREAiIDS _;,o VOUCHER-- 6 039 22 -7.a_ CITY OF L'IAMONG BAR RUN GATE: 04/16/1959 10:17:0'3 1'OUCF+ER REGISTER` WAGE: 15 DUE THRU: 04/26/l-'49 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PRC ECT -ACCT PO # INVOICE !ECC" PT!ON AMOUNT DATE CHECK MICE; LINA: ENTERPRISES Ot;i4`''=1-4610--' t: _= COMrUTEL'. EC'.'IPMENT 4'�.:. TOTA P".EPAI.._ ._ TOT€L VOUCHE'RE 4`',5 DU .'Eti10R 4''.=ii? p INCTOTAL MIKE DRO N GRAN -STA NDiSN 001 55 .5._x!-42140-- �.�1 a l{,_LC RENTAL -GR .STNG , AT f17 t tl",C TOTAL PREPk, DS .013 TOTAL VOUCHERS 1,600.0; TDTAL DUE VENDOR 1 600. Of) MeeAGr 00140:_l%-4131=-- MMAS' MTG-ii HiiR4:itd 1f11 TOTAL PREPA:DS .00 TUI ;L VG"UCHEF. S1 .110 . u i iL r, I- L 1E VCNi i.0. 0ib m; 'Cii' m 7 P ,Evc F'RI"j TNG QV:S-CASH REC`-''TS 11,4,5(, ia.!;'1_SiC'-4i ---- - EtVELCPES-PUBi1 NOTICE 1`4.1 TOTAL PF.EPr411DS .00 :.:TAS 4 2- '= TOTAL DUE VENDO=. 41°'o.: _-4 t0-- _- T NOTA''r 3EMI'i-=. - CF;IBII4S iG .tjf! _ T \LF�II!6 00 T OTS:_ VOU HERS 7 Li IM c, c CC c � T- 441 „Q ..-`Yt__"-� f 7, -U SGT AL Tr,TA! riU.— VEr,{'-:,FID: "`- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUIN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER: REGISTER, PAGE: 16 DUE THRU: 04/20/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOlIN7 DATE CHECK OFFICE DEPOT 0014010-41200-- 7666 -OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY MANAGER. 71.62 0014040-4i.'1:0-- 7666 -OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY CLERK 62.4 0014040-41200-- 766.6 -OPEN SUPPLIES - CITY CLERK `i.6:='. C:�i1405C}-41200-- 7A66-DFEN SUPPLIES - FINANCE 40.43 001`510-41200-- 706b -OPEN P '' ._-- - G` r : S E 5U F_� n- FU .i I� WORD:. 40 OPEN cU'F LIE- - TY 001400 ,0-412200— �:: , a , Imo,_ _ �h;:=�,.: ::_::: SPE:~ SU: � C� GENERA: - 102 -- � 41 -:) -- 66 -?PEN _' "p"LIEc u^":E'=:rL r., ,4 :1P L1E _ . r:- ' i: -- r .-4. iobk-iFE;5 = .. HNE UPPLI-_A -CM _ SU1�:_1tJ vill Ilfil'i-.J�:. 4 .13 TAL PGtF:n HL'_ 0,0 Ti—:. (jr TiJ T AL DUE VENDOR i-1:{ S�CUnIT DEF-SUMMiTFRIL E G' ... TD f AL TDTAL VDU,CH,ERS -_-AL -SUE VEIND 00R 50.00 21_ _IGHTA -C::SD YEHI.LC 48,3.20 AIDS TOTAL VOUCHERS 43-2. 2`0 T i)UE .EN`UF; 7-A- -- rr iY h...- ..l it:{i. !:4�t:}�1LF'F _T ` Yiu._-- .o ) LET HILL 5' PL loci ._.._T" r^hIL ;' YLiN INS `RE{iE 9,891.9'? 04;'::0j 19.99 2t35. --•._.---..-: -- I:MIN FEE 4' 1 r 04 x2:_)11999 = -9 --,; F'rEF'hI'iv 4.39.17 -�TAL VOUCHERS TOTAL JVL 'YENI. I I, .11 RUN GATE: 64/16/1999 10:27:04 CITY OF DIAMOND BARVOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 17 DUE THRU: 04/24/1999 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PREPAIDDATE CHECK PERS RETIREMENT FUND 401-21109-- 441-21109-- PP6k RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 4,10'x.1'2 04500'319`+9 35'.61 t 1111-21109-- PPL RETIRE CUNTRIB-ER 608,69 4.20 3 , - �' 0 r'� J 1'33°' 35361 ' nr. n. __ 4:V1 211V PP- SURVIVOR BENEFIT '311 .62 04 %^0 /1999 35:361 ' 0'311-21109-- PP 7 SURVIVOR BENEFIT 3 t04/20/1999 11.,_2 . •'1_.- �:�..;6; 001-2110):%-- T'P7 MILITARY BUY BACK. 509.69 (14,••20/199'3 :35361; 001-21109-- PP7 RETIRE CONTRIB-�R - 3 E.1.�,52 04/n/1999 , - -:� ._ _.;6(-1 .� 4':'11-211'•): -- F'�`7 RETIRE CCINTRIH-EE ^ 4,107.6E 04,20)/19`?`i' ' 3�:=6() `- =`Ff: Mil ITAR'' ?'JK BACk. _ � - 50'9.69 04/;:0/19:9 35361 TOTAL PREPAIDS 1..F, c ,514.57 TOTAL VOUCHERS ,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 16:,514..`_:7 PROJECT SISTER 0114010-42_:55-- COMMUNITY SUPPORT •,- 0()'31,00 04/20%1999 35°45 5 TCTAL PREPAIDS 1 000.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR i'006.00 PROMO GRAPHICS '3!014();+5 -41400 -- 001-20711;-- 10TH ANNIVSRY T-SHIRTS 1,51.3.34 04%20/1994 35356 USE TAX -115.34 04/20/1999 0556 TOTAL PREPAIDS 1,39.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS .00 TOTAL DUE VEND 1,393.00 _u,IQN SERVICEL0 01 i i;uJ'RfCE c1-. fz_t 5.s. 613648447 MNTHLY "TdTORNG-SYCAMORE C bl_b4'_147 MNTHLY MNTO-NG-HEIRTAGE +r' 13. . Jh TOTAL PREPAIDS 1!n TOTAL VrOUCHER23 216.'24 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ?16.'4 YVONNE PRUITT 0015350-44100-- P & R COMM, - 3/25 MTG 40.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 40.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 40.00 R & T' BLUEPRINT 001`51_-42110-- 41';: PRINT ING].RiNING SUN .2-12 T07PL F`REF'AIDS 00 TOTS _ 'VOUC'HERS 241. 22 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 21414.212, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/19199 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 1E: DUE THRU: 04/20/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-;CCT-PRO,iECT-ACCT PO 4 INVOICE DESC-IPTION AMiOUPST DATE CHEC}'. KEN RADFORD 001-347 1-- RECREATION REFUND 8.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 8.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR `'•00 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 0015250-41200-_ SUPPLIES - TRAIK MEET 15.59 0015350-41200__ SUPPLIES - TINY TOTS 50.07 0014090-427325-- .. 7^cI37-11 MTG SUPPLIES-CNL MTG-x.12':' 7.E:0 ;,Gi5:,50.41-.��0-- 1L SUPPLIES - TRACK MEET 11.33 42_'25--37272,37261 MTG SUPr' T ES-LANTERMAN4.12 6.6'1 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 91.70 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 91.70 KAREN RALSTON 001 -34780 -RECREATION REFUND '+5.00 TOTAL PREPAIIIS 00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 75.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 75.00 EVELYN RAMOS 001-32250-- REFUND -IMPOUND FEES 60.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 60.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 60.00 AhMhi� `.ANJEAfi i 001-230r_� - 44 PARK SECURITY DEF. 50.00 TOTAL FREF'AIDS •00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 REMEDY ii!)1404{�-44tiGir- F'rcc-: TEMP.SVC�-311 "i.7 '4 ��_1._.._,J l,Li,_ 26.70. TEMP. SVCS -3J19, '22 ?: 24 214.24 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 241.02 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 241.02 TERESA ROSALES 4'J396 SECUR.I 71' DEP . -MAPLE HILL 50.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 50.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 50.00 ,JOSEPH R;U?IC„A ,01`:'1:1-44100-- i FLNG : COMMIXG-2/9,2/23 120.00 TOTAL F'F,EF'AIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 120.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR i20.0G CITY OF DIAMONI' BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 19 DUE THRU: 04/2-0/1999 FUPlIi/SECT-ACCT-F'RDlECT-ACCT P 0 # INVOIC,,,r E DESCRIPTION PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK SAM`S MOBIL 0015210-42310-- FUEL - VOLUNTEER PATROL 8:3,74 0014415-42310-- CODE CA 9553 FUEL - CODE _NF 121.97 TOTAL PREPAIDS ,Ot;: TOTAL VOUCHERS 0`.71 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 205.71 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE 001-23010-- LEGAL AD - FPL 99-04 1'32.48 001-23010-- LEGAL AD - FPL 98-025 149.76 001-13010-- LEGAL AD-FPL 98-05916. 0, 92 001-23010-- LEGAL AD- FPL 99-061 88,56 001-23010-- LEGAL AD- FPL 99-001 88.56 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 629,28 TOTAL DUE VE :DOR29 6' :2 .2' BASSAM M SEBAI 001-34760-- RECREATION REFUND 106.00 TOTAL PREPAID) .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 106.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 106.00 3E-:':RAN SECURITY 6014090-440100-- 7 7 4107 BANK COURIER VCS-APRIL99 187.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 187.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 187.00 y ;ELLii.J� .aE PIR1',>0 R-REATIDN REFUND 44.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS 00 TOTAL VOUCHER.. 44.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 44.00 S71. DEPOT BHNN.,.. LHNIGRMPN Tr rRr— 1'21.1 .06 00 TOTAL VOUCHER LS i, 1.06 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 1 + ,22..06 Ora.+,,•,., RECREATUON REFUND 56,00 TOTAL PpEF`AHIS ,;}�i TOTAL VOUCHERS 56.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 56.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 20 DUE THRU: 04/2011999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK SO CA ASSN OF GOVERNMENTS 0014010-42525-- GENL MEMBSHP MTG-ANSArI 65.00 04/20/1999 55367 TOTAL PREPAIDS 65.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS •��`' TOTAL DUE VENDOR 65.0u SO CALIFOF,NIA BIN7ERY MAILING MAR_ S 00140;5-421y1-- 750' 24::55 6CF.IaO TOTAL VOUCHERS 192.00 r;rADUE, r�r;;nF198. 0c, T'o"L LL E Y'IYLUI.: SO'�TH POINTE MIDDLE SCHL -;H ORCH'ST A , COMMUNIT'' SLPPCRT 21,500.00 04/20/1999'55340 771TAL PREPAIDS 2 1500.00 TOTAL VOUCHERS •0(0 TOTAL DUE VFN 0P 2,500.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0015316-42126-- ELECT SVCS -MAPLE HILL 315.54 t0IF5lio-42i'26-- ELECT SVCS -TRAFFIC CONTRL 149.=3 ,,,, -42126-- "I5 '`` ELECT SVCS-STARSHINE 13.93 001 5 ':_13-42i' c•-- ELECT SVCS-HRTGE FARE; 434.55 O�,i�i' 4i2v-- ELECT SVCS -PETERSON PARK. 1,753.92 0;:1=311-42126-- a� ELECT SVCS -PAUL BROW . 69 42 13i:�53P•_42126 _ ELECT SVCS -DISTRICT 38 12.66 0015:'2 4 12`-- ELECT SVt*S-RON REAGAN 422.81 0015311-42126-- ELECT SVCS -PAUL GROW 39.73 ELECT SVCS -PETERSON 1,730.07 -4u�_ ELrLT °i'"5-B:S'..'•�. 87 -- ELE T SVCS-FANTERA 1.'}54.:'0 -- __ ELEC? .':j -DIST'? T 03 .73.4` _ =L - S+irr-T :`' TC rDNTRl Ei;T .�..; AF'a C i t:.t 4,751.67 LEC— S.__ TAr,.ITor—NE 27.21 ELtLT E';i-_-5�u"MfTr.LDGC 21311..:;1 _ -- ELECT CYN PARK 3:C.66 _- ELEC- c `'- RO'd FEAGAN2 '. yr.-- EL ECTv.�c--,TIiE PARK 74;'.21 ? _' _E- U' MITRI GE 157, 26 rLt�i �VCt-r1 r_� HILL �7 .57 QCT 'VCE-SYC CYN r'ARK 9c. :. ;. ELECT 5':C.. -H TGE COMM, CTR 574.64 1 072.52 TOTAL PREPAI LS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 15,695.81 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 15,695.81 STEVEN ENTERPRISES 0014090-41200-- `''2� 5`1`?13 XEROX SUPF'LS-MAP COPIEF' 200.68 TOTAL PREPATDS (K) TOTAL VOUCHER: 200.68 TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR 200.68 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE. 21 DUE THRU: 04/20/1999 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK; SUBWAY 0014000-42325-- MTG SUPPLIES-CNCL MTG=/29 01014090-42325-- MTG SUPPLIES-CNCL MTG 416 7.98 0014f3':i-423' 5-- MTu SUPPLIES -COG TRCI': STD 001410-42325-- M'u SUPPLS-LANTERMAN iSKF 47.816 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHER': 71.32 TOTAL DUE VENDOR71,:.. PAI3ETT THOMPSON 0014{?40-423411-- 1,40=: SEMINAR -MSO"Ehv7I 4J6 I49.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .DO TDTAL VOUCHERS 14' .00 TOTAL DUE 'aENDu9. 149.0+� TOWER '`QIUSTRIAL MEDICAL CROUP 00140:+0-42345-- 7501; PRE-EhiPLYMT PHYSC L-MARTNZ 1013.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TDTAL VOUCHERS 1113,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 10='.00 TOW;NE CENTRE T4''VEL = PW;S CDLII 3E4.00 0 ,! i(1994 x,n3 aN-: TaTAL : -,_r'AI-: =64.00 - T1;A' ;_ C .. VOUC:HER� .00 T0: T AL DUE VENDOR 3E:4.00 c 001•�;:i0-44i0 TDTAL PREPAIDS ,00 TOTAL VOUCHER- 120.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 120.00 U.S. POSTMASTER 0014090-42120-- FEES LANTERMAN FLIERS 5,500.00 04/20/1999 35341 00i535Ci-41 : ' POSTAGE-COMM.SVCS 60.00 TOTAL PREPAIDS 5,500,00 TOTAL 'VOUCHERS 60,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 5,560.00 UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORc ±::14090-4:40-- ;58-6 13:_25 Ec,.JIP RNTAL-LANTERMAhr MTG 400.21 1 �: -1 .�._:.4 EyM` T'• UIP RN:NL-LAN ERMAN MTG 326 ,45 TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHER'S 72..66 TCTAL DUE VENDOF; 70.66, ..,:T=� INDIA Av-rIATiON 001- _=0{t2-- 49%9: SECUP°ITY DEP.-SUMMITRDGE 50,00 T=,TAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL 'VOUCHERS 5t , 00 -M•rr DUE ; N- P 50.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 22 DUE THRJ: 04/20/10091 PREPAID FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # IN'vOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 0014090-42120--9632780027 3rd SHIF'T'ING 6.75 TOTAL -' 1.l PREPAjS loo ' TOTAL VOUCHERS 6.75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 6.75 URBAN DESIGN STUDIOS C;f i ur 1 1 }0 1, �� i -: 0015210-44009-- F'ROF. ,yC5-SiT.. �IiGTL TC,T. PREPAID 1^ TOTAL VOUCHERS I 2,lUC.0 TOTAL DUE `rEN :GF. 2,100,00 WALLACE INCORPORATED 5',- ;541 97X,91 RECEIPTS-RECREATTQN 4''°• ' TOTAL PREPAIDS .00 TOTAL VOUCHERS 489.99 TOTAL DUE VENDOR 4B"•G WALNUT VALLEY iWIPTER DISTRICT WATER SVCS-PANTERA PARK 1,75 .:30 WATER SVES-PETERSON PARK 659.97 WATER SVCS-SYCM CYN PARK 539.46 Qt115_.i_4.2124-- WATER SVGS-SulMMITRIDGE PK 1,134.13 0015 -32"S -42126 --WATER SVCS -TREE WTRNG MAR 141.16 001555:3-45509-- MATER SVCS-DIST. 4,033.37 3= WATER SVCS-DIS -,a�.,°- 3,043.1 ,T. ,:,5 26-- ._ , 42-1 _. rnrp! PFEF'AT05 .00 07AL VOUCHERS 1. 617 i , =^)" TOTAL nllc .'E`MOR i? '`n•F5 RECREAT '�^; REPU, 75.U0 -TAL F"K"_F'AI-C. 'i}it i4L iulu.,.,:� c T,',-'! ^uL lig\!If'�� 75.OU t`f 44Ev SIECKE _ ft;i-�si!16-- PROF. SVCS -FPL "9-Ot:r=�•- ir 1t-- Pu`F.SV'� - FPL '?'?-.0'2 14,3.G0 lt -- :irr - :9:�_f cG RDF. S' "S FF'' ). 4 Ln PROF .SV'CS - FPL -,: -051 -' 1 PROF. CVCt - FPL 9'y-060 49 S TOTAL P,RFp"'IDS •i}'' TOT AL V0U'_4ER:S TOTAL DUE VES!_:; XEROX •r R_._T 4 2':10- .47;1 iir:'7�';():) -4 1`1':1:2!: MAINT. COFY S' CS-'1ARCH ` 9 Jif .GJ TOTAL PREP AI: C;n r.jt L DUE' ;;`,. no CITY OF DIAMONI BAR FUN DATE: 04/16/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 23 DUE THRL C a/ i,ar+a PREPAID j'• F'U'a' SECT -AC T -F I �- nrrr Lf/ 4 -el RGJE I—�!�r:_ri � y 4 >< 1 EyL T�lni dVGI�E L RIF A AMOUNT DATE _ GCK CK WELLS WELLS FARGO BANE. (1014010-42325-- r, -' xTti tip C•rMBR LE It' : AN3ARi 1? :: 2i.62 4.1'20 /11 ::5 •� 2aJ' uU �S� 1LES/LEAG Cf -I F-CHAN 1 �, -- - :/2'.`j/+9',;' _Ja�_ 35351 ' 0014010-42330-- GONSALVES-2/1"-APlSARI_ C C : r 25f.52 9;a cfc!1q 11-4: rf-- CPRS AWARDS-ANSAR 21::i - ir'.;:•1 :'Y2i1l 0014010-42;25-- MTD - 2/2. - HUFF-. t��'� 1.65 04/20/1999: JJ•JJ_� .f ; 5 5n 2 0014010-42)21]"0-- CPRS AWARDS-O'CONNOR 13.00 (14/2(/1999 J[z 0014010-42330-- CPRS AWARS-ANSARI 2/21 112.60 04/20/1999 3535`_ 001400-42:R1i]-- FLEL - CM 33.21 04/0/1991 35155 Cx]14030-41a:i]-- GONSALVES/SAC-CMGR 781.57 04/20111999 35355 LEAG CONE D 1 C MTG-(MGR 143.83 `}4/20 199.E / 9 JJJJJ 0014010-4'33 i]-- LEAG CONF/DC-HUFF :3/4,10 77x.54 04/20%1999 35352 (0]1403;(1-423:10-- ORAL D -ACCOUNTANT 35.76 04/2i] 1999 35355 OO 1 4010-42330-- LEAG COP.r/GIfE AWDS-HE-%-RA I,1_,3.55 04/20/11999 35350 TOTAL I'tl Alr`J i C77 J •' L TOTAL 'VOUCHERS f,;1 T — TOTAL ,:t VENDOR 577,63 WEST COAST ARBC;ISTE INC � -fir-_r 4121 li.iJ1JV'4'J'vr r:i . 151 ` TR EMA�,.f JI C 0 J!._:;'"y -iTAI 0.0 C f . ' -a 14-- .ill TA �- 'VOUCHERS � . TCT AL DUE VENDOR 2t'l,010 l;;;.ES-7 END UNIFMIRMS r„�1qa+=.-41200-- �•-'--- *'=15” P ECUIPMT-VLNTR PATROL 56.20 TOTAL VO'.lCPERc, , 20- ZU Vj--rfl) Jw-- ` LESS: Tl._ L- + UFuH;E :::• 157.0'0; AL PF'EFAIIS ,OC, T 4 5 � I _ L,rE, r r1.?J J. '-:vim _'TlHE"NE W`li Egnli:�= �`(:' -71'+x'•^.__ 112 (10 Ob TOTA- V01UCHER, 112,(}11; - _ 3TAL '-'-cF'AI�S 1111 TOTAL � iv,;C;HE•�S 1 _:; 5 .4 TOITAL DU_ k, _ 134.4.5 XEROX •r R_._T 4 2':10- .47;1 iir:'7�';():) -4 1`1':1:2!: MAINT. COFY S' CS-'1ARCH ` 9 Jif .GJ TOTAL PREP AI: C;n r.jt L DUE' ;;`,. no CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RJN DATE: 04116/1999 10:27:00 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE: 24 DUE THRU: 04/201'15199 FUND/SECT-ACCT-PROJECT-ACCT PO # INVOICE DESCRIPTION I -N PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK STEVEN YAMADA 001-23002-- 49403 PAR:' SZ rm'i DEP 5:).00 TOTAL PREPA17LI 00 TOTAL VOLICHEPS 50. . L TOTAL DIU- VENIDIOR REPORT TOTAL PREPA I DES E 'PO RT TOTAL D` -C -H E!'R RE.ZmTOTAi April 12, 1999 93 13 TO: City of Diamond Bar ATTENTION: Tommye Cribbins, Deputy City Clerk RE: Claim McGrath (Bellegia) v. Diamond Bar Claimant Kathryn McGrath D/Event 4/17/98 Rec'd Y/Office 4/5/99 Our File S 97318 RQ We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: • CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, C WARREN OMP Y f �D. cc: CJPIA Attn: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive • Ste 400. Orange, CA 92868 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 740-7999 • (800) 572-6900 9 Fax: (714) 740-9412 JOAN ALTMAN BRENDAN W. BRANDT CRAIG O. DOBLER ROBERT W. FLORY DANIEL A REED KRISTEN L. ROBINSON STEPHAN G.SALESON BRUCE D. VARNER SEAN S. VARNER MICHAEL O. WOLF VARNER, SALESON & DOBLER LLP LAWYERS A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP POST OFFICE BOX 1148 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1148 3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 3U CE 610 RIVERSIDE.3 March 30, 1999 Mr. Terrence Belanger, City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, #100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 TELEPHONE (909) 274-7777 FACSIMILE ((909 2274-7770 E-MAIL WWW. SD W.COM Re: Leslie Bellegia vs. City of Diamond Bar, Walnut Valley Water District, and William McGrath Los Angeles County, East District Case No. KCO29777 Dear Mr. Belanger: Please be advised that this law office represents the interest of Kathryn McGrath, the successor -in -interest to William McGrath, deceased. William McGrath has been named as a defendant in the above -entitled matter. This correspondence is directed to your attention as a claim for damages by Kathryn McGrath as successor -in -interest to William McGrath pursuant to Government Code Section 910, et. seq. A.Claimant: Kathryn McGrath individually and as successor -in -interest to William McGrath, Deceased. 101 Milford Drive, Corona del Mar, CA 92625. B. Person Presenting Claim Where Future Notices are to be Sent: Varner, Saleson & Dobler LLP, Attention Daniel A. Reed, 3750 University Avenue, Suite 610, Riverside, CA 92501; (909) 274-7777. C. Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim: Claimant Kathryn McGrath, individually and as successor -in -interest to William McGrath is submitting a claim for equitable indemnity, contribution, and declaratory relief arising out of a slip or trip and fall incident occurring on April 17, 1998. Claimant has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit initiated by plaintiff Leslie Bellegia filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, East District, Case No. KCO29777 (a copy of the Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"). Plaintiff Leslie Bellegia contends that she tripped and fell on a crack in a public sidewalk on the north side of the street fronting 23525 a cn r --, — � 3 s - Please be advised that this law office represents the interest of Kathryn McGrath, the successor -in -interest to William McGrath, deceased. William McGrath has been named as a defendant in the above -entitled matter. This correspondence is directed to your attention as a claim for damages by Kathryn McGrath as successor -in -interest to William McGrath pursuant to Government Code Section 910, et. seq. A.Claimant: Kathryn McGrath individually and as successor -in -interest to William McGrath, Deceased. 101 Milford Drive, Corona del Mar, CA 92625. B. Person Presenting Claim Where Future Notices are to be Sent: Varner, Saleson & Dobler LLP, Attention Daniel A. Reed, 3750 University Avenue, Suite 610, Riverside, CA 92501; (909) 274-7777. C. Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim: Claimant Kathryn McGrath, individually and as successor -in -interest to William McGrath is submitting a claim for equitable indemnity, contribution, and declaratory relief arising out of a slip or trip and fall incident occurring on April 17, 1998. Claimant has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit initiated by plaintiff Leslie Bellegia filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, East District, Case No. KCO29777 (a copy of the Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"). Plaintiff Leslie Bellegia contends that she tripped and fell on a crack in a public sidewalk on the north side of the street fronting 23525 VARNER, SALESON h DOBLER LLP LAWYERS Terrence Belanger March 30, 1999 Page 2 East Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar, California. The sidewalk where the incident occurred is owned by the City of Diamond Bar. Photographs of the location where plaintiff fell clearly indicates that the crack plaintiff contends caused her fall was not created by the owner of the abutting private property. D. amages Sot.jzhl: Claimant is seeking from the City of Diamond Bar indemnification, contribution, and declaratory relief for all attorney fees, costs and damages incurred by claimant in the defense of the action brought by Leslie. Bellegia as a result of her fall on City of Diamond Bar property on April 17, 1998. �� • ' �� TO III Fe• • F. Amount of Damages Claim: The amount of indemnity, contribution and declaratory relief sought is anticipated to exceed $10,000.00. The action has been filed in the Superior Court and will consist of a civil case. DAR:Ibs Encl. cc: Mr. Gregg Sholty Ms. Kathryn McGrath Very truly DIniel AjLi6d of VARNER, SALESON & DOBLER LLP SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO GEFENbANT; 1Avlao a Acuaadb) City of Diamond Dar. Walnut Valley Water District, and William McGrath & �-- s / - /Gr YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: CAyM; ASMNED FOR (A Ud. 10 esta denlandando) All PUAP0SES'a-0: Leslie 13ellegia J00C DAN THOMAS !DEPT. A You have 30 Ct}i_ NDAR DAys atter tilts surn- mons is soured on you to file a typewritten re- 4POnso atthia court. A I*ttvr ar phone cell will not protect ya:; your fypewnft9n raspOnsa must be Itl proper legal form If you want the court to }lobi your caro. It you do rot fete your raaponq en time, you may toss the Case, and your ways, mortey and pro - Party may eo taken without further warning from the court. There arm other legal rpqulremonts. You may want to call a7 attornoy right away. If yqu dv not ItnOw an altvrrley, you may call an attorney rafe:r- ral service or a iegal pica office (Iletod in tho phone book). rower u91 :Ai r Deapuds dte qyo !c enbvvven esta 00016n jud the usfed Vane un plain de 30 D1AS CALENDAR105 para presprifar urw respuesfll oscdta a m4qu/na en esxa ,torte. t117A carts a Una !lamada 1eletdrilaa rig Ic otrvicera prorccclda, su respuesta oacrits a maqulrta bcnc que cumpllr con las lorneaYdacica lepalses ap opbdas xi usted qulcrc quo In Coro ercuf he su baso. St usted no prleaeBfA su rrspoesta a tiempo, pua& ponder c•r tabu, y le puedcn guitar su saludo, sr, dlncrq yobas cows de su propledfl d sin a visa adlelonal per parte eta la eortf. +Exist4n otros foul/Ms tagales. Fuede quo usted quicra 8ernpr a vn abopado cnnredlahrmente. si tro conoce a Un abogado, pusdo lfamar a un Sprvkro do r+elonencla de vb4t dos o -a Una eRclna do ayuda !oval (vea er diroctedo Woknlcn). .1tIiR:CIOF l;Ai]iT Q! al)[Ojj113, out, i1�rlei75I 7t ti CSvrl'15I L11SiF1Ct Ont) Civic Center Plaza Pomona, Ca, CA 91766 The name, address, and Wcyilone number orplVr,tifrs a7tomey, ar plainlif Wth.M vn Rttorwyv Ir,: Kcith C. Holmes ($3T 4 9S527) Ef rro+7ttxct !rr direr.' 6o Y er rtu,n YC &Ir i�r �r,o �rci nnoaado der acre a�d<,n1c, c de+l dOniandantc .7U@ no time obugode, esl LAW 01,P c' :OF• 1�2tTIi C. II[)l MfiS 55fi N. Namont Bur 131, cl, uitc 21 b hex No. 985: 7 Dimiond tsar. C!1 9170S, Califi ioia 91765 Pllolie No. 009) 851 -75:�° — —. i'ax No. (909) 800-9 3-29 UA dAN - 7 T" NO -'ICE IC 7A FER5UN SERVED: D: aft .ervtd as an ndivkhoi ,,,efcnj jnj I 2. r � as the petite, S�,�d �nt1Ci tl7t: titiir'szru� n5me nt (guy) 3. � on hrenall Of rCperwlYi. enter Cep 4715 10 (carnoraliun) =1 11521 (derii.cl caporalrw) IlI. Ger' :'IG. -1- Ca :::,�.ihliM Fr .•,.,t•9rn.hi,a7 ( l� alk;,. J 4• L ) by personal:;olfvor, on gale) (:..clmad�l Q CGP 416 bU j'11jnorl _ CCP 41G 7_• iWnr:,:rv'.JQt Ccp 416 rz (,nr;R.idu31'; fizv�M,rrp�np�yRulr.'JBi (Sw. raverjr+far Prpnf nt S�rviCC .i.-T.rlic! C4m.Cd of Carn„�ni7 I o*aCs)t+,lrttr. I.,,vc.rt 1. s; a; SUMMONS CCP dt._w firm.: Corin! Fnrrr.r,,, It air. "' Kath C:ordcll 11olnics (Bar 4 98527) (909) 861= Law Offices of Kc%th Cordell Holmes FAA ?Q.: 556 TT_ Dlatnond Bar Blvd., Suite 210 (909) 86(m Diamond Bar, California 91765.1000 Insert no me of court, Wictai dishlcl or branch Couri if any. and ppst office and sheet address: Superior Covet of Califonzia, County of Los hnlcics, East Dibtrict 400 Civic Center Plaza Pomona, Ca, CA 41766 W. PLAINTIFF' «r t'.E. i OR Leslie Bellcgits TQ, DEFENDANT: City of Diamond Bar, Walnut Vallcy Water Distnct, rind William McGrath I TO 10 COURT USE ORIGINAL RED JAhI - 7 1SSS R,( )PPRIN N)t IM, CASENUMDER COMPLAINT— Personal injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death D MOTORVEKICLE DOTNER (specify): ED Property Dirctago D Wrongful Dcalh �h► r © Personal Injury 1-71Other Damagos(specity): 1. Ties plaading, including attachnlenrs a'ut cahibits. eonsl;ts of the following number of pares:_ 2, a, Each plaintiff mimed above is a coripctcnl adult ExceptplairR(fl (Ramo): Da corporation qu3617100 to do bu. moss in Caiifarnia Q tin unlncarporatert entity (describe). a public 4rltity (rfesc(ihe) [� a minor F- ] an adult D fpr whUrn a Qjdfdiar, or rorrmnrvator of the est3tc or n guardian ad I#Crn has beert appointed I] other (.specify)- LI other (speU61 Q Except plaintiff (rtrrne): C7 a ccuporatbn gUVlifit;d Iu dD in Cnlifolnld an unincorporated untily ('describC); El a public cnt :y (,rlescri eJ iDa min�ir C3 ar adul+, for whom a guardian ut Corscrvytor of the estate or a guardian ad li;urtl has been appointed other 1.Npccify)- [] otner (speciry; b. D 131341NO (name; is doing bosin(uns Jndef Ine fJOIDU11S s:inu of (s/x:ufy): and has complied with thu fiUiticris t)irsinans narile law& IAlerinaticn tiboV adc:i:krtal plahiulis who are not i.,,rwn in CompluiW - _ ARcar:hmCnt 2G-- - I''ontinuecN _, .-- Fnnn Appiovtfrl by Ing _pidicalCv-101Of.^.aklue„l;t COMPLAINT— Personal injury, Property, Damage, E Kt%orv,; J.lNlar) 1, 1962 Wrongful Death Rub -n7 1(�} CCP ata 1? SHORT TITLE: CABS NUMSER: �rji",ia v. f ity of L)ipi-Rond Aar et el. COMPLAINT ---Personal injury, Property Damage, Wrongful NAth Peg*yn+ 3, a.Ee& dcfcndant nomad above la a naturalpenian CiD Except defendant (nano): Walnut Valley M kxwapt defendant (namoj: City of Diamond Bar Water District ® a buslncss organization, form unknown 0 acorporatOn M an uninovrWrawd entlly (describe): Q a public entity (desr ribc): = other (specify): In Except defendarA (ramie)_ 11 a buslncs:. urganizalicn, form unknown Q a corporation O an uninror1>nrt4ed entity (descerbe). CJ a public entity (describe;: 0 ouvey (v—dy)_ L::j a bu3lnuss organlUtion, form unknown a corporation Q an ardnoorporatod entity (describe}: ® a public crrtity (deso0f): = nfher (sipec:lfy) M Except defondant (name): © a business organfzatlon, form unknown p a corporation F1 an unincorporatac entity (describe): [7j a public entlly (dvscfibv); = other (Spociry;l; b. The true rromes and capacidcs of detandants sued as Does are unknown to piaintiff. a Q Information about additional de.endanis who are nal nattirel pefsons is containw in OOmplaint-- Attachment 3c. d Q Oefcnrdants who art: jcined pursu.)nt to Code of Civil F'rocedurb st:ctioti 3132 ar< (ranges): 4. !%lairntit4'rs required to damply with a claims statute, and a. ® pin[ntiN has Complied with npplicable daims staft+tos, or b, = p1i31nJtf r cxct:Seq rt�im c:urnp)ing tmc;ause (spray)• 5. Alis court Is the proper court bocauSe CJ at least one dele-Ja rt now roGldw In is lurlsdlct!anat i�irW. Q d -IQ principal place cf bun,inucs of , -1 rorpuratior, or uninu,r;au(ah:d Is50Ciutinn i5 in its jurisdirtDnat area., [.bt injury to pomin Lu pgre:pni}I Urn1ert, oCt urred iii itsjLxrisdirti0nal are.2_ Ci other (sna;ary): $. [gyp, nie ronovwing pamor-y4phs pf this uunlpu!Ir.i atC alt E ci un iflfOmation 9ntj !1CtiCt (sf)Frci1YPar39r0Ph n!M'ilrKrR). (CV ntl nuod ) N J1166,01 [ornci! 7•i m, fw lrafAed r'wy: Mn SHORT T1T E ��' l:ASG NUMBrzR- BCllc '& fir. Cit of 17iatnPAf3 Bar et. t2. COMPLAINT Persanal injury, Property Darrlage, Wrongful Death (Continued) T. M Thu damage& claimed (of wrongful death and the folutianships of plaintiff to the dviceaaod aro =) U %W in compiaioi—Altaa,ment 7 0 as foilaws: S. Plaintiff has suffered LJ wpge loss M hospital and modicaf bxi+onsos M Property da-pUo Q other darnagC (specify): Pain & Suffering loss of use of property ($7 general damage k ss of eaming upsci y 9" Rolief sought in this corntpt0int is wit %in thcjuriadi,-tlun of this wort. 10. PLAINT15F PSAYS FQ01,42 Ignt fQr ovstc of suit: rnr sunt, rcl,ef as is f8rr, just, and egoilabie: and (Of � wnipltnsowry damages CM (Superlor Court) according to propf. M (Munfcipal and Justice Court) in the a;noun2 of s ©other (specify): 11, The folkwing eaasnn pf action are a!tachcd anj V)tC slnlesments above apply to ejaw; (t pvch cDmpfnlrtl I)i!rSl hgw one or wont cease.:: n`o0onaltaclredJ LD Mok)r Vehicle GAJ Uunoral Negligence ED Intentional Tory M ProAucis taahitity CO Pramiwr, LinbiAty = Other (soecffy): 0"ya: or purl M,Mp) ,rgna0.tr.: al Silein TI ur a9ormyT. . Wt A1. (!l) t=11FM, COMPLAINT— Personal Injury, Property Damage, .Qji-chl(Arw,ra—I,— rc„n,.., ^ Wrongful Death 1Cantinucd) row Osie SHORT TffLE:CASE NUME,2A CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence a numtu4) a6q d ATTACHMENT in MJComplafnt Cross-Coinplttirit (Use a aeXWO cause of diXon loan tc r cvch cause of acUorr.) GN -1. Plaintiff (name): Leslie Bellegia alleges that delendnnt (namo)- City of Diamond Bar, Walaat Valley Water District, and William N4cGrattt M noes 1 to 10 WQC thQ tegal (PrOAMiato) caum of damage& to plaintiff, By the fallowing acm Or omisticns to gct, dofendafA; negligtntiy caused the damage to plaintiff on (,fate): 4-17-96 it (pjacq). Sidzwnik ill front o1 23525 L. Goldctl 5priiigs Dr. Dianiond Bar, CA (descripffon of reasons for iisbmtry): As a result of DCfcndam*!` negligent maintenance of ith: si#1vwa1k5; in (lie city of Diamond R;±r Plai.nt,ff fell and stiffed personal injuries. Funn i:pptgv ,y Vy Nr; .LOw.nl Cnunr 1 p( Criifomis E&U mo Juilur+y 1. low Rub OU 1(n) CAUSE Of ACTION — General Negligence, CC. 'd;; 1:i SHORT TITLE: GCSE NUM9Eft: Bcllegia v. City of Diamond Bar ct, cl, r2 CAUSE OF ACTION--PromltrSO Liability Pt go 5 >u�,oarl ATTACHMENT TO Q Complaint © Cross -Complaint (Use a saparare cause of aackin form for rirch cause, pfadion.J Prem.11. Plaintiff (namo): LcIshe I301t;gia alleges the arta of O tt ridm,ts were the lt;yal (proxirnale) cause of damag es to plaintiff_ On (dato). 4-,17-98 plointit( ww injured von tho fo9owA r pmmiso: in the foilotmIN fashion (descrip6w of premises and( licLunstances of injury) Flain(i IT was waikiu� on Coldun Springs Dr. on Iiia north side of the simel:, east of Marnond Bar Blvd. ill DianlVIld 13,1T, in Grunt of the NfWival Square Villa,;o whim she trippod and fell un it crack in the sidewalk. Prvm.L-2. ® Count One—Nepligcnco The defendants wrw negligell* owned, mafntained, managed and operlrtcd the describetl prcmiscs were (rlararus). City of Numond Bar, Walnut Vailcy Wates-I)istricl, acid William MC+.jgatil flocs . 1 to ..._ 5 prem l-tI' i, Count Two—Willful Failyre to Warn [Civil Code SC4ti0n 8451 The defendant owners wt* wflfft,lly or mariciou.py fallenIo Uuaed or warn against a dar�gemus cpndiSion, use structure, or aCh,±ty were (names). City` of Diamond Aar, Walnut Valley "atcr DistriCt, and Wfillinn McGrath ® Does 5 . to 7 -..-- 31ainritl, a recreational usor, wo5 Man invited ptrnst Qa paying yuest. Prem.L-d ® Count Three—Dangerous Condition of Publio Property The defendants who owned Public pxooarty 0,1 wriiCh a c'Jny ruu,; condition r:xisted wLxv. fanrrres)• City (if Diamond liar ®Does. I-- In 8 a• The defeadant public entity hud []actual Mtonsttuctive 400CC of t48= extstynGv of ttt8 dangerous cendltiuo h sidficicnt tirne prior to the Injury to nava corrected ii. n L ; The condition was rr::,ted by employee:: of the defendant PUMC entity. Prern.l 5- a, E7 Aflegations about OLh9r Dcfondrntt Th1, dcfendAnts who wort the agent; and esrrulCyc—.' of tho oUrr:r OMCndantt, and acted within )lie SCOpe o`. the ajaney wore (names): X Etna — 4 — to _. 1 it h. Li The deie p%Janis vrilo arC ti; hlo to pl,,inlrf(y lur other reasons and the retibor1S for their iizbili'•y ere L --j docr-ribi cd in :ritra:hillCnt Pi'Cm.L h.b [ j �Ift fUtlrntS (�vam�s). Foss brand by�- .Wfiidel CQUW ul ti01'10'nia 01fe"iw )emery I DY.:' Ri,le w' ii:,) CAUSE 4F ACTION—Premises Liability i:4?.7;5 .J 2-dilW fIlk!1:',! i - VP fF:.• rr,�'rl,,• ., FEDERAL PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, I till] errtplpyed iii The Counly of l.os Angeles, State of Caliitvnia in tic c7Fiice of an attoracy admitted to the Liar of or peruiittc:d to practice boort this court, and that service, was made at the attorney's direction or shall comply with the requirements of state taw i'or proof of scrvicc by trail. I am over the age, of IS years and not a party to the within action; inv businass address is 556 North Diamond Bar Auulevard, Suite 210, Diamond liar California 91765-1000, On December 24,1999, 1 served a true and correct copy and placed in the US Mail, the foregoing document describett as: SUMMONS AND COIVIU"T to Ilio intm5ted parries in this Ut;tion by piach-re; a true and corroct copy thcrcof to; ATTN: William McGrath 101 Milford Dr. Corona DI Mar, CA 9262.5 I ani "readily familiar" with tate rums practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing,, L.ludc:r that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal ServiGc on that sane day with pustage thercort fidly prepaid at I.os Ange", Catiftrrtia in tare ordinary course of business. 1 atn aware that on motion of the party served, hervice is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is afore than one day after dais of deposit for nsailing in affidavit. Rxectttcd on Jantuary 15, IT)9 at Diamond I3111,, Calif egii. ; / r 1Chol:1S �. SAW C} CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 15, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Resolution No. 99 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive". SUMMARY: In order to ensure that motorists making turn movements maintain their respective lanes, and to ensure that vehicles on Goldrush Drive come to a complete stop when reaching Highcrest Drive, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends to the City Council the installation of 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive. On April 6, 1999, staff recommended the installation of multi - way stop signs to reduce potential safety hazard. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive". LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) X Other: 3/11/99 T/T Minutes, Aerial Map Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been X Yes _ No reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? Majority X Yes _ No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Traffic & Transportation 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes —No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVINW D Terrence L. Bela ger J66es DeStefa David G. Liu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 99 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highscrest Drive". ISSUE STATEMENT: To ensure that motorists come to a complete stop when reaching the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highscrest Drive". FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The installation of the striping and stop signs will be funded through the City's Signing and Striping Maintenance account. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On March 11, 1999, the Traffic and Transportation Commission approved the recommendation to install 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highscrest Drive, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive". Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive are residential streets. Goldrush Drive is 2,640' in length with a 60' right-of-way, and a 40' street width, and has a notable vertical upgrade as it approaches Highcrest Drive. Highcrest Drive is 1,295' in length with a 64' right-of-way, and a 40' street width. Currently, a cul-de-sac with seventeen residences, Highcrest Drive also has a notable vertical grade as it approaches Goldrush Drive. Page Two Goldrush Drive/Highcrest Drive April 20, 1999 As motorists approach the intersection, it was noted that some motorists on Goldrush Drive do not give the right-of-way to those on Highcrest Drive and speeding was observed in the vicinity of this intersection_ There were no reported traffic accidents at this intersection within the past three years. To ensure that motorists making turn movements maintain their respective lanes, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommended to the City Council the installation of 50' of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection. Furthermore, the Commission recommended the installation of a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive to ensure that vehicles on Goldrush Drive come to a complete stop when reaching Highcrest Drive. On April 6, 1999, staff recommended the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive to reduce potential safety hazard. This recommendation is based on sight distance, street geometrics, and approach speed to this intersection. Area residents were invited to attend the Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting as well as the City Council meeting. Prepared By: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND HIGHCREST DRIVE A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on March 11, 1999. (ii) At the meeting of March 11, 1999, the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the installation of 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive is appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends the installation of 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive. (iv) At the meeting of April 6, 1999, the City Council determined that motorists will be better served by the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive. -1- B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Said action is pursuant to Sections 10.08.010 and 10.08.080 of the Diamond Bar City Code, as heretofore adopted; 2. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by the approval of the installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and Highcrest Drive; and 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorizes and directs the City Engineer to cause said stop signs to be installed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of '1999. MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1999 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar MARCH 11, 1999 PAGE 5 "Parking, 8 a.m.- 5 p.m., Monday - Friday, Residential Parking Permit O om the first house immediately north of FMC and along Fallow Field Drive includin co Court up to Malad P Court on both sides of Fallow Field Drive and place "No ng, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday — Friday" signs directly across from First Mortgage C ration on the west side of Fallow Field Drive. C/Leonard-Colby accepted the amend . C/Lin seconded the amended motion. Motion carried by the following �l'Call vote: AYES: CO SIGNERS: Leonard -Colby, Lin, VCNirginkar, Chair/Morris NOES: MMISSIONERS: Istik AB SEN COMMISSIONERS: None /Istik explained the reason for his "NO" vote is because he is not assured that the number of allocated parking spaces is for current usage or future usage by First Mortgage Corporation. VI. NEW BUSINESS: A. Installation of multi -way stop signs at the intersection of Goldrush Drive and High Crest Drive. DDPW/Liu presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission discuss staffs recommendation to install 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection, and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive and make its recommendation to the City Council. Following discussion, C/Leonard-Colby moved, C/Lin seconded, to recommend that the City Council approve installation of 50 feet of double yellow centerline striping on each respective leg of the intersection and a stop sign at the intersecting leg of Goldrush Drive at Highcrest Drive. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Leonard -Colby, Lin, VCNirginkar NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Istik, Chair/Morris ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Commissioner Istik left the meeting at 9:10 p.m. VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS: DDPW u reported that at its February 16, 1999 meeting, the City Council conducted a short term traffic solu ' ns study session. The Council was presented with updated information on traffic volumes and the impa to Grand Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard as well as, turning movements in and out of the s\hopping at the intersection. On March 2, 1999, the City Council approved the Traffic and Ca MN�a� Y � � a MN_ r�F P L r'G fit:. n s. R a t r ra' i. t �< !r: r T f � t t r ra' i. t �< Jilli ..aa, .. ,. \� \� ; I X� : 41 ,41 44i, OACm AF 7 II y,o i I i Ri 1 f hi � �iyy� Gt 1b�Jj,. '1 �^y '�,.�^� �' _ » "+'�'fF►�= yXV Pi ^aa. '' � � � � r ':r• a :� *� i y� � ,t� + � ` � � � � � m �_�• AFI � � �,� C x i�. •J � I�' tri � �' � I � i 4i= fit• i � i�J � i ,Mai ^�, , I �� 3 i "4 .�" i r9N' F •. C c � k i !fir vr.x�p 1 y 7 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. S TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 14, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." SUMMARY: The City Council awarded the engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers Street and Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with L.A. County Department of Public Works to approve the storm drain and NPDES requirements. There has also been a public information meeting with residents to discuss the project's intricacies and to receive further residents' input. Another public information meeting will be scheduled after the City has awarded the construction contract. At this time DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report x Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) _ Public Hearing Notification x Bid Specification: on file at City Clerk's office. Other: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes —No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes _ No REVIEWED BY: x? � Terrence L. Belanger City Manager James DeStefano Deputy City Manager via G. Liu Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L.Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." ISSUE STATEMENT The City desires to approve the plans and specifications in order to advertise for bids for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve Resolution 99-xx: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Plans and Specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids." FINANCIAL SUMMARY The total allocated project budget is $500,000.00 of Gas Tax Fund. The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $300,000.00. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Meadowglen Road, between Ironhorse Canyon Road and Silver Rain Drive, has been experiencing constant nuisance -water discharge running over sidewalks and driveways down the street gutters to the storm drain catch basins located near Silver Rain Drive, creating a similarly hazardous condition with growth of algae and scum. Converse Consultants conducted the geotechnical investigation which evaluated the existing underground infiltration and seepage conditions for the project areas and recommended remediation measures to mitigate distress conditions. Recommendation was made for mitigation within Meadowlgen Road such as constructing a street underdrain system, which would relieve the hydrostatic pressure (water pressure) and control the high groundwater conditions and pavement repair: The street underdrain system would consist of an 8" subdrain pipe system along each curb on Meadowglen Road and to be bedded and buried in permeable drain rock material with a sloped blanket drain extended over the subgrade soils across the roadway. The street is highly distressed and the pavement will be reconstructed. The City Council awarded the engineering design services contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates (DL&A) for the Ambushers Street and Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Projects. DL&A coordinated with L-A. County Department of Public Works to approve the storm drain and NPDES requirements. Plans and specifications for the project have been prepared. Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor includes: ➢ Schedule to be submitted at least 10 calendar days before start of work; ➢ Traffic control plans; ➢ Proper means/equipment for the construction dewater activities; ➢ Notification to residents, utility owners and other public agencies; ➢ Completion of all work within 30 working days; and ➢ Liquidated damages of $500/day for non-performance. There has also been a public information meeting with residents to discuss the project's intricacies and to receive further residents' input. Another public information meeting will be scheduled after the City has awarded the construction contract. At this time DL&A has completed the plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements project. Tentative schedule for the project is as follows: Approval of Plans and Specifications April 20, 1999 Notice to Bidders April 26, 1999 Bid Opening May 25, 1999 Award of Construction Contract June 15, 1999 Notice to Proceed June 28, 1999 End of Construction August 9, 1999 Prepared by: David G. Liu /Rose E. Manela RESOLUTION NO. 99 -. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MEADOWGLEN ROAD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented to the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be in the form and content as approved by the City Attorney and a copy of this Resolution shall be contained in each specification package for the work: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock a.m. on the 25th day of May, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the Meadowgle Road Public Street Improvements Project. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Diamond Bar, California, marked, "Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate; or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five; or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally; or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this Contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least 10 percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, or certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and material bond in an amount equal to one hundred 0 00%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carnes compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to fu done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as a Class A contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Diamond Bar. The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar, California. Copies of the specifications will be furnished upon application and a non -reimbursable payment of $30.00 to the City of Diamond. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by a non -reimbursable payment of $40.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overheads. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Diamond Bar. In accordance with the requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Diamond Bar, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this 20`h day of April, 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City this 20'h day of April, 1999. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 4 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the 20d, day of April, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar California CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.: TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 14, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belan er City Manager TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. SUMMARY: The 1998-1999 CDBG Project is for handicap access ramp installation at various locations in Diamond Bar in the vicinity of the local public schools. Handicap ramps are proposed at the following public schools: Golden Springs Elementary (13 ramps), Armstrong Elementary (15 ramps), Castle Rock Elementary (12 ramps), Walnut Elementary (7 ramps), and Evergreen Elementary (7 ramps). Due to the increase of construction costs, the public schools scheduled had to be phased. The following schools have proposed handicap ramps for the second phase: Quail Summit Elementary (6 ramps), Chapparral Intermediate (6 ramps), Maple Hill Elementary (7 ramps), and South Pointe Middle (2 ramps). Phase 2 ramps will be bid as alternate items with this year's project so that if the unit prices received are lower, additional ramps may be completed. Dewan, Lundin & Associates has prepared the specifications for the project. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project in Diamond Bar, and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to receive bids. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification X Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's Office) Other 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A —Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Administration Division REVIEWED BY: - Akokn2pq,__� Tei6ice L. Belange James DeStefano City Manager Deputy City Manager avid G. Liu Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving Specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project in Said City and Authorizing and Directing the City Clerk to Advertise to Receive Bids. ISSUE STATEMENT To comply with ADA requirements providing for handicap access. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX approving the specifications for the 1998- 1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project in Diamond Bar, and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to receive bids. FINANCIAL SUMMARY $100,000.00 of CDBG federal funds was approved and incorporated into the FY 1998-99 budget for these handicap access ramps improvements. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The 1998-1999 CDBG Project is for handicap access ramp installation at various locations in Diamond Bar in the vicinity of the local public schools. Handicap ramps are proposed at the following public schools: Golden Springs Elementary (13 ramps) Armstrong Elementary (15 ramps) Castle Rock Elementary (12 ramps) Walnut Elementary (7 ramps) Evergreen Elementary (7 ramps) -1- Due to the increase of construction costs, the public schools scheduled had to be phased. The following schools have proposed handicap ramps for the second phase: Quail Summit Elementary (6 ramps) Chapparral Intermediate (6 ramps) Mapel Hill Elementary (7 ramps) South Pointe Middle (2 ramps) Phase 2 ramps will be bid as alternate items with this year's project so that if the unit prices received are lower, additional ramps may be completed. Dewan, Lundin & Associates has prepared the specifications for the project. Staff has prepared a tentative schedule for the various project activities. They are as follows: Specifications to City Council April 20, 1999 for approval and authorize City Clerk to advertise for bids Bid Opening May 17, 1999 Award of Contract June 1, 1999 Notice to Proceed June 14, 1999 Start of Construction June 14, 1999 Completion of Construction July 2, 1999 All schools let out for summer break by June 10, except for Armstrong Elementary School (June 29) and Golden Springs Elementary (June 17). Actual construction schedule will be worked around these dates so that construction will not interfere with the school activities. Prepared By: Rose E. Manela -2- RESOLUTION NO. 99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 1998-1999 CDBG HANDICAP RAMPS PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. This is a federally assisted construction contract and Federal labor standards, including the Davis Bacon requirements, will be enforced. If Federal and State wage rates are applicable, then the higher of the two will prevail. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented to the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be in the form and content as approved by the City Attorney and a copy of this Resolution shall be contained in each specification package for the work: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock a.m. on the 17th day of May, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the 1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Diamond Bar, California, marked, "1998-1999 CDBG Handicap Ramps Project." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate; or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five; or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally; or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. -2- The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this Contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least 10 percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, or certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and material bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work. -3- No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as a (Class A and/or C-8) contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Diamond Bar. The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar, California. Copies of the specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Diamond. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by a non -reimbursable payment of $10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overheads. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Diamond Bar. In accordance with the requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Diamond Bar, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this 20"' day of April, 1999. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City this 20'h day of April, 1999. ATTEST: CITY CLERK -4- MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the 200' day of April, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar California -5- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NOZ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 14, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES OF CONVERSE CONSULTANTS FOR EXSITING PROJECTS SUMMARY: On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended a consulting Services Agreement with Leighton and Associates as the City Soils and Geology Engineering firm. Until that time the City had been utilizing four professional consultants to provide on-call/as-needed soils and geotechnical engineering services. One of those firms was Converse Consultants. Noted in the October 6, 1998 City Council Report, the existing projects being reviewed by Converse Consultants, and others, would continue until the development projects are finalized and completed through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated on a time -and -material basis from the applicant's deposit account. Also, the applicant compensates the City approximately 18% of the consultant costs for overhead. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from existing developer deposit accounts to continue the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for soils and geotechnical engineering services of Converse Consultants, for a total amount not -to -exceed $51,489 through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: x Staff Report Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specification Ordinance(:) Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the Resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? N/A _ Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? x Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Finance REVIEWED BY: feirence L. Bel ger City Manager Dmord-UNDMAGEN49 CONVERSE 331 r Jiriies DeStefan Deputy City Man ger 59vil G. 'u Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA N0. MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES OF CONVERSE CONSULTANTS FOR EXSITING PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from existing developer deposit accounts lo continue the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call soils and geotechnical engineering services of Converse Consultants for a total amount not -lo -exceed $51,489 through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. FINANCIAL SUMMARY For development related projects involving soils and geotechnical review, funding is currently and will continue b be provided through developer's fe(Wdeposits paid by the applicant tD the City at the Plan Checking stage. Each specific development related project assignment is compensated on a time -and -material basis from the applicant's deposit account via purchase orders authorized by the City Manager. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION In October 1996, the City Council awarded the two year on-call contracts with provisions lbr extension up tD twee (3) years tD fall soils and geotechnical companies: Leighton and Associates; Kleinfelder, Inc. Engineering & En*on vmW Geology Associates; and Converse Consultants. On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended a three-year Consulting Services Agreement with Leighton and Associates as the City Soils and Geology Engineering firm. To ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants, existing development projects being reviewed by Kleinfelder, Inc., Engineering & Environmental Geology Associates, and Converse Consultants, would continue ung each of the development projects were finalized and completed. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated on a time -and -r k*dal basis from the applicants deposit account Also, the applicant compensates the City approximately 18% of the consultant costs for overhead. The Purchasing Policy and Procedures Guidelines limits the authority of the City Manager to $10,000 for one vendor in a given fiscal year. Converse Consultants' contract for geotechnical monitoring services for the Meadowglen Road Public Street Improvements Project awarded on July 21, 1998 for $40,444.00 wMr a cwndngancy amount of $4,000.00, as well as development related project reviewers and it pectioW wit eaaeod this anwunt in FWA Year 1998-99 (See Attachment 1). This report requests audtortzadon for the City Manager b approve additional purchase orders from existing developer deposit ac courb to continue and finalize the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for the soils and geotechnical engineering services of Converse Consultants through Fiscal Year 1902000 for a total amount not -to -exceed $51,489. The requested adjustment does not adversely affect the General Fund. Prepared by. David G UWUnds Smif D:wordLINDA1ccr-91t1caCONVERSE 330 2 rn J U J 0 J m EO U CUD O 0 Q m OU Z Z CL Z LL t N Q O� W J N C! O o O g C o O p O p 8 p 8 p Q ww ii O O Q O C O W� ch 60 Go .- 44 N 44 cV p u7 uo O N 00 tjow W 8 0 8 8 t 8 _ 8 IL LU app pp§ in ^ 8 O 1► m Z U W iA W) �Rj y p ty Lu i O N � W 8 O Oi co U 8 H $ h 8 w m w v► g o p p p 69 49 F- O _44 8 q O O � r 2 Q r o 8 O �' O 9 p O s g afMP/ o N w w n w 44 H OV m U OLU OV Z w a a 8a°0 S a$ U U Ud W P o C CDIx r �- 0 zC)fn Q W > ° (7 W N }Q ZO V Z Z C07 V W O Y >'8p 3w: D = UW Q >Q Q pJ LL p Q �Z J m �? oZ w �O O `8* = J m Q (o— O N n��� �Z - N i V- N F- OQ. 1- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO 6 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 REPORT DATE: April 14, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, city Manager TITLE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES FOR EXSITING PROJECTS SUMMARY: On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended a Consulting Services Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. as the City Civil Engineering Services firms. Until that time the City had been utilizing six civil engineering companies to provide on-call/as civil engineering plan checking and inspection engineering services. Dewan, Lundin & Associates is one of those firms. As noted in the October 6, 1998 City Council Report, the existing projects being reviewed by these firms would continue until the development projects are finalized and completed through Fiscal Year 1999.2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75% of the applicant's fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fee's for the continuance of the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by Dewan, Lundin & Associates. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is not -to -exceed $25,500.00. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: x Staff Report Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specification Ordinance(s) Other SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the Resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? WA _ Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? WA — Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA Yes No Which Commission? — — 5. Are other departments affected by the report? x Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Finance REVIEWED Y: c3 Tk nce L. B anger City Manager D:WORD-LINDAWGEN-990LA 042099 kwu`20- Jimes; DcSt4f ino Deputy City M Hager vidG. Liu Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF DEWAN, LUNDIN it ASSOCIATES FOR EXSITING PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fee's for the continuance of the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by Dewan, Lundin & Associates. The total amount including Capital Improvement Projects through Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is not-th- exceed $25,500.00. FINANCIAL SUMMARY For development related projects involving civil engineering plan checking and inspection, funding is currently and will continue to be provided through developer's fees/deposits paid by the applicant to the City at the plan checldng stage. Each specific development related project assignment is compensated with 75% of the applicant's fees via purchase orders authorized by the City Manager. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In October 1996, the City Council awarded the two year on-call contracts with provisions for extension up to three (3) years to six civil engineering companies: Bryan Stirrat & Associates; Charles Abbott Associates; Dewan Lundin & Associates; GFB-Friedrich & Associates; Hall & Foreman Inc; and RKA Civil Engineers. On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended three-year Consulting Services Agreements with Charles Abbott Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. to provide City Engineering Services. To ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants, existing development projects being reviewed by Bryan Stirrat & Associates, Dewan Lundin & Associates, GFB-Friedrich & Associates, and RKA Civil Engineers would continue until each of the development projects were finalized and completed. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75% of the applicant's fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. The Purchasing Policy and Procedures Guidelines limits the authority of the City Manager to $10,000 for one vendor in a given fiscal year. The purchase order amounts for Dewan, Lundin & Associates for Fiscal Year 1998-99 total $23,196.37 (see Attachment 1). This includes Capital Improvement and carry over on-call projects. Further development related project reviews and inspections will exceed the $10,000 City Manager authority in Fiscal Year 1998-99. This report requests authorization for the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fees to continue the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checldngfinspection services of by Dewan, Lundin & Associates for a total amount not to -exceed $25,451.37 (see Attachment 1) through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The requested adjustment does not adversely affect the General Fund. Prepared by: David G i iulUnds Smith D:WORD-LN)A=R-WCR GFB 042099 2 DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASSOCIATES April 20,1999 At1acI 1 ` Caltln9an0Y anwunt a twrtmd vAM =trod award D:EXCa-LN WREADg4EET'M A 04 yp 9D CIP 6799 APPROVED 2/2/99 APPROVED 4/6199 RW INSP. LOT LINE ADJ. RW INSP. RW/GR. PLAN CK RW/GR. INSP. TOTAL RW/GR. MSP. RW REVISION OTAL RW INSP. Rw PLAN CK Rw INSP. As BUILT OTAL TOTAL BALANIC REQUEST FOR PROJECT DATE PO NUMBER PAID FY PO AMOUNT 1888.89 BALANCE NEEDED F COM FY 1998-99, FY CIP 1898-2000 FY 199849 1998.98 CDBG HANDICAP ACCESS RAMPS 3/16!99 8558 $14,390.00 $0.00 $14,390.00 '$2,000. $16,390.00 CABLE UPGRADE INSP. SERVICES 416199 $5,00000 $000 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 ON-CALL CIVIL CARRY OVER 2871 WOODBRIDGE 3f17/98 7067 $112.50 $112.50 $0.00 $0. $112.50 ARMITOS 611/98 6528 5585.00 $595.00 $0.00 $0. $595.00 445 BALLENA 6/lQw 7417 $112.50 $112.50 $0.00 $0. $112.50 24002 FALCONS VIEW 5/29198 7362 $770.18 $770.18 $0.00 $0. 9/9/98 7930 5795.00 $795.00 $0.001 $0. $1,565.18 1636 DERRINGER 23/99 am $Bw 89 666 89 $000 $0 7/21/99 7855 $127.50 $127.50 $0.00 $0. $784.39 T ON-CALL CIVIL FY 199849 2823 WATERCOURSE 9/28/98 7888 $127.50 S12750 $000 $0 $127.50 2445 INDIAN CREEK 8128198 7884 $24000 $2,� 00 $000 $0 3+2m $289.30 $289.30 $255 $764.30 T TOTALS $23 196.37 $3,537.07 -$19,659.301 $2,255.1 $25,451.37 ` Caltln9an0Y anwunt a twrtmd vAM =trod award D:EXCa-LN WREADg4EET'M A 04 yp 9D CIP 6799 APPROVED 2/2/99 APPROVED 4/6199 RW INSP. LOT LINE ADJ. RW INSP. RW/GR. PLAN CK RW/GR. INSP. TOTAL RW/GR. MSP. RW REVISION OTAL RW INSP. Rw PLAN CK Rw INSP. As BUILT OTAL CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 REPORT DATE: April 14, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR EXSITING PROJECTS SUMMARY: On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended a Consulting Services Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. as the City Civil Engineering Services firms. Until that time the City had been utilizing six civil engineering companies to provide on-calllas-needed civil engineering plan checking and inspection engineering services. GFB- Friedrich & Associates, Inc. is one of those firms. As noted in the October 6, 1998 City Council Report, the existing projects being reviewed by these firms would continue until the development projects are finalized and completed through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. This is to ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75°x6 of the applicant's fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fee's for the continuance of the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by GFB- Friedrich & Associates, Inc. The total amount including previously authorized Capital Improvement Projects through Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is not -to -exceed $37,600.00. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: x Staff Report Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specification Ordinance(s) Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the Resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? WA Yes No 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? _ Majority _ 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? WA Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ N/A Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? x Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Finance _ REVIEWED BY• 4_X/ Terrence L. Bel nger City Manager D:WORD-LINDAAGEN-994FB 042099 464)_0 James DeStef no Deputy City Manager avid G. iu Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ON-CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES OF GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR EXSITING PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fee's for the continuance of the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checking and inspection services provided by GFB-Friedrich & Associates, Inc. The total mount including Capital Improvement Projects through Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is not to -exceed $37,600.00. FINANCIAL SUMMARY For development related projects involving civil engineering plan checking and inspection, funding is currently and wil continue to be provided through developer's fees/deposits paid by the applicant to the City at the plan checking stage. Each specific development related project assignment is compensated with 75% of the applicants fees via purchase orders authorized by the City Manager. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In October 1996, the City Council awarded the two year on-call contracts with provisions for extension up to three (3) years to six civil engineering companies: Bryan Stirrat & Associates; Charles Abbott Associates; Dewan Lundin & Associates; GFB-Friedrich & Associates; Hall & Foreman Inc; and RKA Civil Engineers. On October 6, 1998, the City Council approved and extended three-year Consulting Services Agreements with Charles Abbott Associates and Hall & Foreman, Inc. to provide City Engineering Services.. To ensure consistent and continuous service to the applicants, existing development projects being reviewed by Bryan Stirrat & Associates, Dewan Lundin & Associates, GFB-Friedrich & Associates, and RKA Civil Engineers would continue until each of the development projects were finalized and completed. Each specific development related project assignment has been and continues to be compensated with 75% of the applicants fees. The balance (25%) compensates the City for overhead expenses. The Purchasing Policy and Procedures Guidelines limits the authority of the City Manager to $10,000 for one vendor in a given fiscal year. The purchase order amounts for GF&Friedrich & Associates, Inc. for Fiscal Year 1998-99 total $35,171.16 (see Attachment 1). This includes Capital Improvement and carry over on-call projects. Further development related project reviews and inspections will exceed the $10,000 City Manager authority in Fiscal Year 1998-99. This report requests authorization for the City Manager to approve additional purchase orders from developer fees to continue the pre October 6, 1998 assignments for on-call civil engineering plan checidngfinspection services of by GF&Friedrich & Associates, Inc. for a total amount not -to - exceed $37,564.53 (see Attachment 1) through Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The requested adjustment does not adversely affect the General Fund. Prepared by. David G U"inda Smith D:W0RD-L1NDA=R-WCCR GFB 042089 2 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. April 20,1999 Att8thmGnt1 D:EXCEL-LINDAWREADSHEETS% iFB a 20 99 CIP 1498 APPROVED 1/19199 EXTENSION APPROVED 3/3198 3R.. EST TOTAL a -W INSP. 1S BUILT EST. ST. TOTAL tw INSP. tW PLAN CK tW INSP. W. TOTAL NN, EST. TOTAL W PLAN CK W INSP. S BUILT EST. ST. TOTAL W INSP. VNIGR. PLAN CK N/GR. INSP. i BUILT EST. 3T. TOTAL TOTAL BALANC REQUEST FOR PROJECT DATE PO NUMBER PO AMOUNT PAID FY 1998-99 BALANCE NEEDED FO COMPLETIO FY 1998-99, FY 1999,2000 CIP FY 1998.99 SLURRY SEAL DESIGN AMEND. AREA 1 1/19M 7013 $22,118.00 $0.00 $22,118.00 $0. $22,118.00 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENG. 3r3/99 8386 $9,250.00 $1,207.50 $8,042.50 $0. $9,250.00 ON-CALL CML CARRY OVER 2878 OAK KNOLL 8/12/97 6302 $381.21 $190.61 $190.60 $0. $381.21, 2821 OAK KNOLL 10022197 6574 $225.00 $33.75 $191.25 $0. $255. $480.001 23338 WAGON TRAIL 300 6996 $112.50 $0.00 $112.50 $0. $112.501 1902 MORNING CANYON /1J98 6/1J987375 8119/98 7452 $112.50 $112.50 $112.50 $56.25 $0.00 $56.25 $0. $0. F F $225.00 E $112.50 F 528 PLATINA 61'19198 7503 $112.50 $112.50 $0.00 $0. ONZALL CML FY 1998-99 1941 FLINTROCK 7/15198 12/10198 7633 8213 $1,076.15 $924.55 $1,076.15 $189.91 $0.00 $734.64 $0. $0. F A 3800. A $2,800.70 E 3031 STEEPLECHASE 8/10/98 7805 $127.50 $0.00 $127.50 $0. $127.50 R 3255 DIAMOND BAR 9/11198 7939 $618.75 $618.75 $0.00 $0. R $538.3 R $800.001 x $1,957.12 E. $37,564.53 TOTALS $35171.16 $3 597.92 $31 573.24 $2 393.37 D:EXCEL-LINDAWREADSHEETS% iFB a 20 99 CIP 1498 APPROVED 1/19199 EXTENSION APPROVED 3/3198 3R.. EST TOTAL a -W INSP. 1S BUILT EST. ST. TOTAL tw INSP. tW PLAN CK tW INSP. W. TOTAL NN, EST. TOTAL W PLAN CK W INSP. S BUILT EST. ST. TOTAL W INSP. VNIGR. PLAN CK N/GR. INSP. i BUILT EST. 3T. TOTAL CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. (n TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 13, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Mana er TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving the Surplus of Three City Vehicles which are no Longer Required as Provided under the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200. SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200 authorizes the City Manager, with approval of the City Council, to surplus all personal property which is no longer used or has become obsolete. Currently, the City has three vehicles, which are no longer used because of the present condition of the vehicles. Therefore, this Resolution' of the City of Diamond Bar would allow for the City to appropriately dispose of these vehicles. These surplus items will be auctioned on a competitive basis, and a record shall be kept of each item sold. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution of the City of Diamond Bar and authorize the City Manager to surplus the vehicles as listed in Exhibit "A". LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification Ordinance(s) X Other: Contract: References; and Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200 EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? REVIEWED BY: TDA JTe nce ALIBe lian er City Manager _Yes No X Yes _ No N/A — Yes _ No N/A _ Yes _ No — Yes X No Q , Anne M. Haraksin Administrative Assistant CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Approving the Surplus of Three City Vehicles which are no Longer Required as Provided under the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200. ISSUE STATEMENT: Shall the City Council approve the Resolution and authorize the City Manager to surplus three vehicles, which are no longer required, under the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200? RECOMMENDATION: The Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 3.24.200 authorizes the City Manager, with approval of the City Council, to surplus City -owned property if the items do not meet the present or future needs of the City. Currently, the City owns three vehicles, which are no longer needed because of the present condition of the vehicles. Approval of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to surplus the property and utilize the General Auction Company as the auction firm. Staff contacted four auction houses: General Auction Company; Nationwide Auction Systems; South Coast Auction; and Bakers Auction. It has been determined that the City would receive the greatest amount of money for the vehicles if the City were to utilize General Auction Company as the auction firm. The four auction firms and the commission rates are as follows: Auction Firm % Commission the Auction House Receives General Auction Company 1.5% on vehicles Nationwide Auction Systems 11% on vehicles South Coast Auction 30% on vehicles Bakers Auction 30% on vehicles The General Auction Company auctions vehicles, real estate, construction equipment, office equipment and all types of industrial and/or commercial business items. Their customer base is primarily municipal agencies located throughout Southern California including the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside. The cities of Fontana, Baldwin Park and Upland were contacted as references, and the three cities highly recommend that the City utilize the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Surplus Resolution Page Two General Auction Company. The auction house is located in Norwalk, California, and the auctions are held every third Saturday and are open to the public. General Auction Company staff will move the property to the storage and auction site, clean and detail the vehicles, coordinate all legal documentation, liability releases and accounting, and net proceeds would be delivered to the City within fifteen working days. In return for auctioning the City's vehicles, the General Auction Company will receive 1.5% commission on each item sold. Additional fees include a transportation fee of $20 per vehicle and a $10 fee for each title search. Before auctioning the item, the General Auction Company contacts the DMV and initiates a title search. The Auction Company conducts a title search in order to verify that the City is the legal owner. RESOLUTION NO. 99 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE SURPLUS OF THREE CITY VEHICLES WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.24.200 WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City vehicles are no longer required for City purposes; and WHEREAS, Section 3.24.200 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code authorizes the City Manager to surplus any vehicles which are no longer used or have become obsolete, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to surplus said vehicles as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: SECTION 1. That approval and authorization is hereby given to surplus the vehicles described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this 20th day of April, 1999. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 20th day of April, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar Exhibit "A" SURPLUS LIST VEHICLES 1989 Oldsmobile Vin#1G3AJ51N8K6301141 1989 Chevy Corsica Vin#lG1LT5419KE274087 1991 Chevy Pickup Vin# 1 GCCS 19Z 1 M8198349 AUCTION AGREEMENT (539) GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY 13804 Shoemaker Ave. Norwalk, CA 90650 (562)483-0526 GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY (hereinafter "GAC") and undersigned (hereinafter "SELLER") agree as follows: 1. AGENCY SELLER hereby appoints GAC as its agent to conduct a public auction of the personal property as described herein. GAC shall be on independent contractor. SELLER authorizes and confers upon GAC the power to take all actions on SELLERS behalf necessary to complete the auction, including but not limited to publication and recordation of a "Notice to Creditors of Bulk Sale by Auction" in compliance with the Bulk Sales law, giving any other notice or filing any documents that may be required by law, accepting cash or checks on behalf of SELLER as registered and/or legal owner of any motor vehicle sold to effect a transfer, and satisfying or comprising secured parties who hold or assert a lien in any property sold at auction. SELLER hereby agrees to sell the property to the highest bidder, with no minimum, reservation, buy -backs, or persons bidding for SELLER. 2. PROPERTY The property is generally described as cars, trucks, vans, trailers, motor homes, camper vehicles of any kind, make or model, equipment, machinery, tools, parts and/or miscellaneous items used, manufactured or distributed by any industry, busi''n��ss, entity or agency. %%Z Commission applies to the following: cars, trucks, vans, motor homes, boats and/or camper vehicles 15% Commission applies to personal property, office equipment, furniture, construction equipment, trailers and/or misc. items At the option of GAC, vehicles may not be offered at auction unless the Certificate of Ownership and all other documents necessary to effect a transfer of title of motor vehicles, trailers and towable forklifts are submitted to GAC at least five (5) days prior to the sale. The SELLER agrees to pay advertising and all other costs as provided below on any property withdrawn from the sale as a result of the failure of the SELLER to submit the required title documents. GAC reserves the right to add other personal property not owned by SELLER to the auction inventory. 3. TIME AND PLACE. GAC shall use GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY'S yard located at 13804 Shoemaker Ave Norwalk, California, as the auction site. None of the property may be sold before the auction without the written consent o oth parties, in which case the sale proceeds shall be treated as part of the gross proceeds of the auction. GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY will accept items on a continuing basis to be included in the next available and regularly scheduled auction subject to GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY'S discretion to change such date. In the event of SELLER'S breach of this Agreement, SELLER agrees to pay the commission provided below based on current market value of said property plus all of GAC's out of pocket costs. 4. COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES. GAC shall receive as commission See Item #2 Above of gross sale proceeds. GAC makes no representations or warranties as to the amount that the property (or a particular item thereof) will sell for. GAC shall be reimbursed by SELLER the cost of a title search if one is deemed necessary by GAC. In the event GAC satisfies or takes an assignment of the interest of secured parties, all amounts paid to the secured parties in satisfaction of the secured interest or for an assignment of the interest to GAC shall be deemed to be advances by GAC, which advances, shall be deducted by GAC out of the sales proceeds of SELLER after payment of commissions and expenses. The terms and conditions on the reverse side TRANSPORTATION @: $20 nn (PER UNIT) of this agreement must be read carefully. TRANSPORTATION @: (PER LOAD) DETAILING @: (PER UNIT) AGENCY CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAINTING @: (PER UNIT) OTHER: CONTACT NAME: ANNE HARAKSIN ADDRESS: 21660 E. COPELY, SUITE too APPR - ' CITY DIAMOND BAR STATE: -CA ZIP 91765 DATE: 4/8/99 PHONE (909) 396-5692 GAC BOND # 1007186 SIGNATURE GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY REFERRAL LIST CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Mr. Trine Manriquez 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-5501 CITY OF FONTANA Mr. Sid Lambert 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA (909) 350-7678 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Mr. Mike Madrid 13135 Garvey Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (818) 960-3993 CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS Mr. Ed Andrade 11710 Telegraph Rd. Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 868-0511 CITY OF ANAHEIM Mr. Rodger Olsen P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, CA 92803 (714) 765-6828 FONTANA POLICE DEPT Mr. Michael Myers 17005 Upland Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 (909)350-7797 BALDWIN PARK POLICE DEPT. Lt. Robert Curtis 14403 East Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 960-1955 CITY OF UPLAND Mr. Frank Domijan 1360 North Benson Ave. Upland, CA 91786 (909) 931-4253 GENERAL AUCTION COMPANY REFERRAL LIST THE GAS COMPANY Mr. J.J. Silvas 8101 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660-5164 (562) 806-4216 COUNTY OF ORANGE Mr. Tony Bernard 1300 S. Grand, Bldg. A Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)834-7158 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O.C. Mr. Marc Dubois 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 x2650 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Mr. Mel Bryant 2980 Washington Street Riverside,CA 92504-4647 (949) 955-4923 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH Mr. John Aguilar 505 Foreat Ave Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 497-0347 CITY OF WHITTIER Mr. Paul E. Waugh 12016 Hadley St. Whittier, CA 90601 (562) 464-3548 METRO WATER DISTRICT Mr. Robert Fortson 700 Moreno Ave. La Vern, CA 91750-3399 (909) 392-5217 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Mr. John R. Swaim 1253 Price St. Pomona, CA 91766 (909) 469-0237 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. Lt. Rick Edgmon 550 N. Flower St. Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714)647-7000 INTEGRATED WASTE MGMNT. Mrs. Robin A. Hall 320 N. Flower St., Suite 400 Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714)834-4151 LAGUNA BEACH POLICE DEPT Officer Cathy Berg 505 Forest Ave. Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 497-0701 WHITTIER POLICE DEPT Mr. Bill Cosby 7315 S. Painter Ave. Whittier, CA 90602 (562) 945-8217 Ai-+-a.-l--t "C REVENUE AND FINANCE § 3.24.200 Sec. 3.24.170. Use of recycled materials. The city encourages the use of recycled paper and materials in response to all bids for supplies and services. Wherever possible, preference will be given to those vendors of, supplies and services to the city who utilize recycled materials, including recycled paper products. (Ord. No. 02(1995), § 2, 2-21-95) Sec. 3.24.180. Bidding for public works projects. Public works projects, as defined in the California Public Contract Code Section 20161 or subsequent amendments thereof, shall be bid, advertised and awarded in accordance with applicable sections of the California Public Contract Code. (Ord. No. 02(1995), § 2, 2-21-95) Sec. 3.24.190. Contractual authority. The city manager is authorized to enter into contracts where the amount of the contract does not exceed $10,000.00 with any single vendor within a fiscal year; provided there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the fund account against which said expense is to be charged. Contracts in excess of the city manager's authority must be approved by the city council. In the case of professional services, where there does not exist a specific appropriation in the fund account against which said expense is to be charged, the city manager's expense authorization shall not exceed $5,000.00. (Ord. No. 02(1995), § 2, 2-21-95) Sec. 3.24.200. Surplus personal property. The city manager is authorized to determine, with approval of the city council, whether any item of city -owned personal property is surplus to the present or future needs of the city. He may designate the purchasing agent to fulfill this function. The city manager may require periodic reports showing all city personal property which is no longer used or has become obsolete'. (a) Items declared to be surplus shall be offered for sale on a competitive -bid basis. Bids may be solicited by written requests, telephone, public notice posted on city property, by advertisements in any newspaper or magazine, or by any combination of such methods. A record shall be kept of notices given and bids received. (b) The city manager or his designee is authorized to sell to the highest bidder. Sale of any item or items with an estimated value in excess of $1,000.00 shall be sold to the highest bidder, in accordance with the formal bid procedures, or any other means provided herein, with the approval of the city manager. (c) When, after a reasonable effort has been made to obtain bids, no bids have been obtained for any item of city -owned personal property declared to be surplus, the city manager or his designee is authorized to dispose of such items for the highest scrap Supp. No. 2 CD3:27 § 3.24.200 DIAMOND BAR CODE value that can be obtained therefor, and if a reasonable effort to do so brings no opportunity to sell the same for scrap, he may cause its destruction or any other disposition thereof. (d) The purchasing agent shall have authority to exchange for or trade in, on new supplies and equipment, all supplies and equipment which cannot be used by any department or which have become unsuitable for city use. (Ord. No. 02(1995), § 2, 2-21-95) CHAPTER 3.28. DEMANDS AND CLAIMS Sec. 3.28.010. Purpose. The city desires to adopt procedures relative to the fiscal affairs of the new city and to provide for the payment of its debts as they come due. (Ord. No. 6(1989), § 1, 4-18-89) Sec. 3.28.020. Generally. The provisions of this chapter recognize the general claim procedures applicable to local public agencies, including this city, are governed by the provisions of Government Code §§ 900-906. (Ord. No. 6(1989), § 2, 4-18-89) Sec. 3.28.030. Special claims procedures. Pursuant to the authority contained in Government Code § 935, the following claims procedures are established for those claims against the city for money or damages not now governed by state or local laws: (1) Employee claims. Notwithstanding the exceptions contained in Government Code § 905, all claims by public officers or employees for fees, salaries, wages, overtime pay, holiday pay, compensating time off, vacation pay, sick leave pay, and any other expenses or allowances claimed due from the city, when a procedure for processing such claims is not otherwise provided by state or local laws, shall be presented within the time limitations and in the manner prescribed by Government Code §§ i hin 915.2. Such claims shall further be subject to the provisions of Government Code § 945.4 relating to the prohibition of suits in the absence of the presentation of claims and action thereon by the council. (2) Contract and other claims. In addition to the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, and notwithstanding the exemptions set forth in Government Code § 905, all claims against the city for damages or money, when a procedure for processing such Supp, No. 2 CD3:28 SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1 • Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A CITY OF DIAMOND BAR No AGENDA REPORT — AGENDA N0. ,6.0 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: FROM: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 14,1999 Terrence Belanger TITLE: Extension of vendor printing services for Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide SUMMARY: Under the purchasing guidelines, awards for services to a single vendor shall not exceed _ No $10,000 without prior authorization from the City Council. — Requests for quotations for printing the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide are usually 5. Are other departments affected by the report? sent to approximately six qualified vendors. This fiscal year there have been two vendors (Graphics United; Bradshaw Brothers Printing) that have consistently submitted the lowest bids. X Yes Due to the nature of the task, and the process involved in selecting the vendor with the lowest Community and Development Services — Recreation Services Division qualified bid, it is quite possible that a qualified vendor could become the winning bidder more than once during the year. Thus, a single vendor could exceed the $10,000 limit. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize additional work to be performed by either Bradshaw Brothers Printing or Graphics United (whichever is determined to be the lowest qualified bidder) so that the selected company can proceed with the printing of the Summer'99 issue of the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide. The total amount awarded to these vendors for services rendered this fiscal year shall not exceed $15,000 for Bradshaw Brothers Printing, or $25,000 for Graphics United, at this time. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report — Public Hearing Notification — Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) — Ordinance(s) — Other: — Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1 • Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A Yes No by the City Attorney? — — 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A X Yes Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? — —No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: X Yes — No Community and Development Services — Recreation Services Division MREVIEjBaengfelPr City Manager Mike a on Communications and Marketing Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Extension of vendor printing services for Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide ISSUE STATEMENT: Under the purchasing guidelines, awards for services to a single vendor shall not exceed $10,000 without prior authorization from the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize additional work to be performed byeither Bradshaw Brothers Printing or Graphics United (whichever is determined to be the lowest qualified bidder) so that the selected company can proceed with the printing of the Summer'99 issue of the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide. The total amount awarded to these vendors for services rendered this fiscal year shall not exceed $15,000 for Bradshaw Brothers Printing, or $25,000 for Graphics United, at this time. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The authorization to approve additional work to be performed by either Bradshaw Brothers Printing or Graphics United will have no financial impact on the current FY'98-'99 Communications & Marketing Division budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The average cost for printing the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide is approximately $6,000 per issue. Four issues are printed during each fiscal year. Requests for quotations for printing the Community Newsletter and Recreation Guide are usually sent to approximately six qualified vendors. This fiscal year there have been two vendors (Bradshaw Brothers Printing; Graphics United) that have consistently submitted the lowest bids. Due to the nature of the task, and the process involved in selecting the lowest qualified vendor, it is quite possible that a single vendor could become the lowest bidder more than once during a fiscal year. Thus, a vendor could exceed the $10,000 per vendor limit. Previously, Graphics United submitted winning bids of $4,895 for the Fall '98 issue and $6,220 for the Spring '99 issue. Bradshaw Brothers Printing submitted a winning bid of $5,400 for the Winter '99 issue. If either vendor submits a winning bid for the Summer'99 issue, it will become necessary to extend the $10,000 ceiling again. At the March 16th City Council Meeting, an additional amount of $10,000 was approved for Graphics United, bringing the new approved total for vendor services to $20,000. However, based on previous newsletter bid amounts, as well fees for other printing projects produced by Graphics United, it will be necessary to raise their amount to $25,000 in anticipation of a winning bid for the Summer issue. Bradshaw Brothers Printing, which has one winning bid this fiscal year, will require approval of an additional $5,000 ($15,000 total), should they become the lowest bidder for the Summer'99 issue. In order to retain the most qualified vendor, at the lowest possible price, it will be necessary to extend awards for services to either Bradshaw Brothers Printing or Graphics United, once the low bidder has been determined. PREPARED BY: Mike Nelson CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. Z.. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 15, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Authorization to the City Manager to Purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville. SUMMARY: At the October 20, 1998 City Council Meeting, the City Council approved the expenditure of AB 3229 (COPS Program) monies for the 1998/99 Fiscal Year. The approved list of expenditures for the L.A. County Sheriff's Department includes the purchase of a vehicle to be utilized as an unmarked sedan. The City intends to utilize the aforementioned funding mechanism to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for the L.A. County Sheriff's Department. However, pursuant to the City's Purchasing Ordinance, City Council must grant approval for the City Manager to sign the necessary purchasing documents because the cost of the vehicle exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000). Therefore, staff is seeking City Council approval to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for an amount not to exceed $20,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar authorize the City Manager to purchase the 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for an amount not to exceed $20,000. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: X Staff Report _ Resolution(s) _ Ordinance(s) — Agreement(s) _Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification Other: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A No by the City Attorney? _Yes _ 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: _ 'VIND een Belger City Manager ,4At /1/I dl� Anne M. Haraksin Administrative Assistant MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ISSUE STATEMENT: CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. April 20, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Authorization to the City Manager to Purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville. Should the City Council authorize the City Manager to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for an amount not to exceed $20,000? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar authorize the City Manager to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for an amount not to exceed $20,000. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The City will utilize AB 3229 funds for the purchase of the vehicle. Staff contacted three automobile dealerships to solicit bids for a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville. The three vendors responded with the following price quotes: Vendor CCC Pomona Pontiac Community Pontiac Cost of Vehicle Not to exceed $20,000 Approximately $25,012 Approximately $28,285 * The cost of the vehicle includes delivery and tax. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the October 20, 1998 City Council Meeting, the City Council approved the expenditure of AB 3229 monies for the 1998/99 fiscal year (Attachment "A"). AB 3229 monies are distributed via the Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program, which was established in 1996. The COPS program is intended for front-line law enforcement services, including anti -gang and crime prevention. Purchase of Vehicle April 15, 1999 Page Two The approved list of expenditures includes the purchase of an unmarked sedan. Specifically, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department has requested that the City utilize the AB 3229 funds to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville. According to the Sheriff's Department, the Bonneville has enough space and engine power to meet the Department's needs. The County of Los Angeles will hold title as registered owner only, and the City of Diamond Bar will hold the legal title of the vehicle. All liability insurance, maintenance, repairs, gasoline, and other necessary vehicle services will be provided and paid for by the Sheriff's Department. The vehicle will be on loan to the Sheriff's Department for an indeterminate time, however, the vehicle will be returned to the City of Diamond Bar when, in the opinion of the Sheriff's Department, it is no longer suitable for County service. Pursuant to the City's Purchasing Ordinance, it is necessary for the City to secure the lowest purchase price for materials, supplies and capital equipment. Therefore, staff obtained three bids. Staff contacted two automobile dealerships (Pomona Pontiac and Community Pontiac), and one independent automobile dealer (CCC). The two automobile dealerships' price quotation exceeds the allocated $20,000. Therefore, staff contacted an independent automobile dealer, CCC. Mr. Skip Clark, owner of CCC, is an authorized automobile dealer (Dealer #5148), who purchases vehicles via factory automobile dealer auctions. The vehicles at the auction have less than 12,000 miles, and are vehicles, which are formerly used as corporate cars, movie cars, dealership cars, or rental cars. The purchased vehicles have a factory warranty for 36 months or 36,000 miles. However, with an additional $700, the vehicle will have an extended warranty for five years or 100,000 miles, with a $50 deductible. CCC attends the factory auctions and purchases cars for local law enforcement agencies. In fact, CCC periodically purchases vehicles for the Southgate Police Department, La Habra Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Staff contacted Captain Terry Rammell from the La Habra Police Department, and Captain Rammell highly recommends the utilization of CCC for the purchase of the unmarked sedan. CCC has purchased many vehicles for the La Habra Police Department, and Captain Rammell feels that CCC is very reputable and experienced in purchasing and registering law enforcement vehicles. CCC has also purchased over $2 million dollars worth of vehicles for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. These vehicles are often utilized as unmarked vehicles, and are registered accordingly. Staff contacted a reference, who along with the Los Angeles County Fleet Department, purchased vehicles for the Sheriff's Department. Specifically, staff contacted Mr. Bob Ciulik, retired Asst. Chief of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and Mr. Ciulik recommends the utilization of CCC because of the overall cost savings to the City. Therefore, it is recommended that the City utilize the lowest bidder, CCC. It is also recommended that the City authorize the City Manager to purchase a 1999 Pontiac Bonneville for an amount not to exceed $20,000. In total, it is estimated that the vehicle will cost approximately $19,302. This expenditure includes the approximate cost of the vehicle ($16,800), tax ($1,302), the extended warranty ($700), and the fee to CCC ($500). Purchase of Vehicle April 15, 1999 Page Three In order for the City to purchase the vehicle, the City Council must authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract for the purchase of the vehicle. According to Diamond Bar's Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual, "The City Manager is authorized to bind the City for the payment of services, supplies, materials, equipment, labor or other valuable consideration furnished to the City in an amount not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000)." Therefore, since the vehicle amount exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars, the City Council must give approval to the City Manager to sign the necessary purchasing documents. Attachment COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEM9ER 30, 1998 FILE.NO. FROM: RICHARD J. MARTraz CAPTAIN TO: TERRY BELANGER, CITY MANAGER WALNUT REGIONAL STATION CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED USE OF AB 3229 MONIES The followingis ourroc=dafm fccthe tureofAB 3229motics forthe l998199 &cal year. 1. Directed patrol operations 2. Training 3. Vehicle, unmarked sedan 4_ Surveillance equipment and accessories 5. Community relations promotional items 6. Youth Athletic Leapt afar -school programs. 7. Communications equipment (phones, radios, etc) 8, Computer identiadt system 9. Portable Breathalyzer ldts 10 Tape recorders and accessory items 11.Camera, 35mm SLR, with leases $55,000.00 520,000.00 $20,000.00 510,000.00 $ 5,000.00 S5,000-00 S5000.00 S51000.00 S2,000-00 S2,000.00 S1,000-00 The items shown hem arenot rankedinanyparticularorder ofimportw=- 1helistisre1ative1y&1nbu4 depending on c= ces, maybe amended fmm time to time as needed. Ouracpcndi n requo0will continue to be processed in the same manner as in the past. RJM/DES/ad CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: April 20,1999 AGENDA NO. Cv -13 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Mana! lam' SUBJECT: Settlement Agreement By and Between the City of Diamond Bar and the Dolezal Company and the Dolezal Family Limited Partnership BACKGROU NDIDISCUSSION: Mr. Warren Dolezal is the owner of property located in the 3000 block of Steeplechase Lane. On June 20, 1995 the City approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 23382, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-1 and Oak Tree Permit No. 95-2 for the proposal of subdividing the property into four residential lots. On September 15, 1998 the City Council denied the applicants request for an extention of the land use approvals. Mr. Dolezal subsequently filed an action in Superior Court seeking to overturn the city denial. The panties have agreed to settle the dispute. Upon execution of the agreement, Dolezal will submit a cashier's check to the City in the amount of $5,020.74 for payment of the City processing costs related to the 1998 extension request. Dolezal will file an amended map containing a maximum of 3 lots which will provide for the preservation of the existing oak tree and submit a filing fee deposit for the processing of the amended map. The City will expeditiously schedule public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration of the 3 parcel map. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Attorney to execute the agreement Attachment: Settlement Agreement THIS SETTLS'CM AGREMOM (the "Agreement") is made and entered into and effective on FQW,(X-, 1999 by and between THE CITY OF DIMOND BAR, a municipal corporation, on behalf of itself, its City Council and its officers, agents and employees (the "CITY") and TSN DOLEZAL COMPANY, a California corporation, and the DOLEZAL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership (collectively "Dolezal"). R 9 C I T A L S A. Dolezal is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Diamond Bar, California located along the northerly boundary of the 3000 block of Steeplechase Lane, and more fully described as Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 7409, recorded December 9, 1976 in Book 74, Pages 3 and 4 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California (the "Property"). B. On June 20, 1995 Dolezal obtained approval from the City of Tentative Parcel Map No. 22382, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-1 and Oak Tree Permit No. 95-2 for the purpose of subdividing the property into four residential lots (the "Land Use Approvals"). C. On September 15, 1998 by its Resolution No. 98-54 the Diamond Bar City Council denied Dolezal's application for an extension of the Land Use Approvals, thereby allowing them to expire. D. On or about October 23, 1998, Dolezal filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, East District of the County of Los Angeles, entitled The Dolezal et al., Case No. KCO29327, in which Dolezal alleges in relevant part that the City inversely condemned its property by denying it access to the property by way of Hawkwood Road, a public street. E. On or about December 14, 1998, the City filed its answer to the foregoing complaint denying the allegations contained therein. F. On or second action in the East District of the of mandate ent.itled about December 11, 1998, Dolezal filed a Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, a petition for writ 4 -1Case No. KS005104, seeking to overturn ty' the Cis denial of the extension of time for the land use approvals [this petition and 990303 12393-00002 m7 C01e2a12 0 the complaint referenced in Recital D hereinabove to be collectively referred to herein as ',the Lawsuits*]. G. The City denies the allegations contained in the petition for writ of mandate and contends that its denial of the extension of time of the referenced land use approvals was proper and supported by the evidence. H. Since filing the Lawsuits, Dolezal has negotiated an agreement with the Diamond Bar Country Estates Association providing, among other things, for a right.of access over the streets controlled by the Association for the purpose of ingress and egress to the Property and for a reduction in the number of buildable lots on the Property from four to three. I. In light of the agreement referenced in Recital H hereinabove, the City Council of the City is willing to reconsider its decision denying an extension of time for the Land Use Approvals subject to fulfillment of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. J. Though each party believes it will prevail if this matter proceeds to litigation, the terms contained in this Agreement offer a mutually satisfactory resolution of this dispute and serve to avoid the cost and uncertainty of litigation. K. The parties believe and intend that this Agreement and the various actions and transactions it contemplates will provide a fair, equitable and permanent resolution of the matters in contention described in the pleadings filed in the Lawsuits (the "Dispute°). W T N S S S E T H For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of these premises and of the promises, agreements, representations, warranties, covenants, and conditions contained herein, the City and Dolezal hereby agree'as follows: 1. Stipulation dor Issuance of Alternative Writ of Mande-. Upon execution of this Agreement, counsel for the parties shall execute a stipulation for issuance of an Alternative Writ of Mandate in Case No. KS005104 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, solely and exclusively in order to allow the City Council to regain jurisdiction over Dolezal,s request for extension of the Land Use Approvals. 2. ion Of this Agreement, Dolee zalshall odeliver Qtoecounsel ofor xthe tcity a 990301 11193-00002 ml dolezal2 o — 2 — -. :) , - . _r"✓ Li Ij cashier's check in the amount of $5,020.74 made payable to the "City of Diamond Bar," representing the amount due and owing the City in processing costs for the processing of Dolezal's request for final map approval and previous extension request in 1998. 3. Consideration of Extension of Time for Amended Trac-�.�t Man- Upon issuance of the Alternative Writ by the Court, Dolezal shall file with the City an amended map containing a maximum of three lots and providing for preservation of the oak tree thereon, and a request for an extension of time for one year from the date of this Agreement of amended Tentative Parcel Map No. 22382, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-1 and Oak Tree Permit No. 95-2, accompanied by a cashier's check in the amount of $3,750, representing the City's usual filing fee deposit for Processing an amended tract map and a fully executed copy of the agreement between Dolezal and the Diamond Bar Country Estates Association referenced in Recital H hereinabove. City shall expeditiously schedule public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council for reconsideration of the request. In the event the Court declines to issue the Alternative writ, or the City Council denies the extension request, or the City Council approves the extension request subject to conditions which are unacceptable to Dolezal, or Dolezal has not entered into a binding agreement with the Diamond Bar Country Estates Association as referenced in Recital H hereinabove, then this Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect and City shall promptly refund to Dolezal the filing fees referred to above in this Paragraph 3. Otherwise it shall be enforceable and binding on the parties. Nothing herein, however, shall compel the City Council to act in any particular way on the application for extension of time. 4. Diamiseal and Payment. In the event that the City Council approves Dolezal's extension request and amended map filed pursuant to this Agreement, Dolezal shall within twenty- four hours of the City Council's adoption of a resolution of approval file with the Superior Court a dismissal with prejudice of the Lawsuits, and deliver to counsel for the City a cashier's check in the amount of $4,544.63 made payable to the „City of Diamond Bar." The Mayor's execution of the resolution of approval shall be contingent upon performance by Dolezal and its counsel of the obligations of this paragraph. Counsel for Dolezal shall provide counsel for City with a conformed copy of the dismissal with prejudice within three (3) days of receipt thereof from the Court. 5. Waiver Of Attorneys' Fees. With exception of the payment provided for in Paragraph 4, each party will bear its own costs, attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Lawsuits, the Dispute and with respect to the preparation and execution of this Agreement. 950303 11333-00002 mi d01era12 0 - 3 - 6. Release- Upon execution of this Agreement and Performance of the obligations set forth in paragraphs i through 5 hereinabove, in consideration of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and except for the obligations arising out of this Agreement, the parties shall and do hereby generally and specifically relieve, release, and forever discharge each other from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, judgments, accounts, obligations, promises, acts, agreements, costs, expenses (including but not limited to attorneys, fees), damages, actions and causes of action, of whatsoever kind or nature, whether now known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, based on, arising out of, or in any way connected with any conduct, act, omission or state of facts with respect to the Dispute and the Lawsuits. Each party expressly waives the provisions of Civil Code Section 1542, which reads: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." 7. ReDreeentations and Warranties. a. The parties hereto warrant and represent to each other that: (1) Each party hereto has received all corporate, partnership or other approvals necessary to enter into this Agreement on behalf of such party and that the person signing this Agreement on its behalf is fully authorized to commit and bind such party to each and all of the terms and conditions hereof. (2) Each party was duly represented by counsel in connection with this Agreement, and acknowledges that its officers have carefully read and reviewed this Agreement with counsel, and have freely and voluntarily entered into this Agreement of their own accord, and are not entering into this Agreement because of any duress, fear, or undue influence. (3) This Agreement is the result of protracted, arms' length negotiation between the parties. (4) Each party has full power, authority and capacity to release the claims which are the subject of this Agreement and has not previously transferred, assigned or encumbered any claims released herein to any other person or entity. (5) The parties to this Agreement mutually warrant and represent that no right, claim, cause of action or 290303 11393-00002 mj daleaal2 0 — 4 -.,i - . - T demand, or any part thereof, which either of them has against each other and released herein has been assigned, granted or transferred in any way to any other person, entity, firm or corporation. (6) In negotiating this Agreement, each party has made various representations to other parties and their attorneys. Nevertheless, each party specifically does not rely upon any statement, representation, legal opinion, accounting opinion, or promise of any other party in executing this Agreement, or in making the settlement provided for herein, except as expressly stated in this Agreement. (7) Each party hereto agrees that such party will not take any action which would interfere with the performance of this Agreement by any other party hereto or which would adversely affect any of the rights provided for herein. (8) The parties hereby covenant and agree not to bring any claim, action, suit, or proceeding against any other party hereto, directly or indirectly, regarding or related in any manner to the matters settled and released hereby, and further covenant and agree that this Agreement is a bar to any such claim, action, suit or proceeding. b_ The warranties and representations set forth in this paragraph shall survive and shall continue following the execution and delivery of this Agreement. e. X -o- Admission of -Liability expressly recognize o--�� ver. The parties hereto p Y gnize that the terms and conditions of this Agreement constitute a compromise and settlement of disputed claims and an accord and satisfaction of the Dispute. Neither the Stipulation for issuance of an alternative writ of mandate nor this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as an admission by any party hereto of any liability of any kind to the other party, nor shall be it considered or interpreted as an assumption of any liability by either party. 9. Attorneys Fees. Should any party bring any lawsuit to enforce or interpret the terms and provisions of this Agreement, or arising out of or related to this Agreement, whether pursued under contract or tort theories, the losing party in such action shall pay to the prevailing party, in addition to any other relief ordered by the court, costs and expenses in connection with that prevailing litigation, including reasonable attorneys, fees and expert witness fees. The provisions of this section shall apply with equal force to any appeal of any decision rendered by a lower court, and any enforcement efforts undertaken in connection with such decision. 990303 11393-00002 my Cp1GC312 0 - 5 10. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the validity, construction, interpretation and effect of this Agreement. 11. Notices. All notices to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given, upon receipt, if delivered personally, or telecopied with receipt acknowledged, or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or delivered by a recognized commercial carrier, to the parties at the addresses set forth below, or at such other address as any party shall have designated for itself by ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party: if to the CITY: Terrence Belanger City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 With a copy to: Michael Jenkins, Esq. Richards, Watson & Gershon 333 South Hope Street, 38th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1469 (213) 626-8484 If to DOLEZAL: S•�it/.l,�iis �B✓sga csg 9340/ With a copy to: Robert E. Knudsen, Esq. 121 N. Harvard Avenue Claremont, CA 91711 12. waiver, Modification and Amendment This Agreement may not be changed, modified or amended except by written instrument, specifying that it amends such 990303 11393-00002 mj dole"12 0 - 6 - agreement and signed by the party against whom the enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension or discharge is sought. No provision hereof may be waived unless in a writing signed by all parties hereto. Waiver of any one provision shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein. 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the instruments executed and delivered herewith contain the sole and entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the entire subject matter hereof, and any and all prior discussions, negotiations, commitments and understandings related hereto are hereby merged herein. No representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, other than those contained in said documents have been made by any party hereto. No other agreements not specifically referred to herein, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. 14. Agreement binding. This Agreement is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto and each of them. 15. Interpretation. This Agreement is deemed to have been prepared by all of the parties hereto, and any uncertainty or ambiguity herein shall not be interpreted against the drafter, but rather, if such ambiguity or uncertainty exists, shall be interpreted according to the applicable rules of interpretation of contracts. 16. Execution. This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute a single agreement. 17. Time of the essencg. Time is expressly declared to be of the essence. 990302 11393-00002 My 412,10za12 0 - 7 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed.as of the date first set forth above. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By Mayor ATTEST: By city Clerk THE DOLEZAL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP THE DOLEZAL COMPANY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richards, Watson & Gershon - Attorneys for City of Diamond Bar By: Michael Jenkins, Esq. Robert E. Knudsen, Esq. Atter Dolezal Parties Robert E. Knudsen, Esq. 990303 11393-00009 mj dalo=12 0 — 8 TOTAL P.09 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 7.1a TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 8, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations" SUMMARY: The City administers the processing of parking citations pursuant to the State decriminalization of parking citations. The City established the parking penalty schedule through the adoption of Resolution No. 96-41. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to conform to the Diamond Bar Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code. No fees have been increased; however, sections have been amended for clarity. This matter was continued from April 6, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt Resolution 96-41C "Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) — Ordinance(s) _ Other: _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? — 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Los Angeles County Sheriff's _ REVIEWED BY: Xlee �Fritzal Terr nce L. Bela . City Manager Assistant to the City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. 7.1a MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations" ISSUE STATEMENT: Should the City amend the Parking Penalty Schedule for clarity and consistency with the Diamond Bar Municipal Code? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt Resolution 96- 41C "Amending the Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties and Late Payment Fees for Parking Violations." FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The adoption of Resolution No. 96-41 C will have no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Pursuant to State law, cities are responsible for the processing of parking citations. Cities must adopt a Parking Penalty Schedule for Parking Penalties that list all infractions of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code. The Parking Penalty Schedule needs to be amended in order to be consistent with the Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code and to clarify the infractions. No fees are being increased; however, one section was added and several sections were removed from the list. The modifications are the following: Added: 10.16.410 - Parking Prohibited Amended: 10.08.080 — Parking Signs 10. 16.640 to 10. 16.660 — Taxicab Stands — Authorized Locations 10, 16.1240 to 10. 16.1310 — Parking in Preferential Parking Districts Removed: 10.08.070 - Warning and Directional Signs 10.08.090 - Lane guidelines and Other Pavement Markings 10.080.140 — Weight Limit Signs; Emergency Procedures 10. 12.910 — Established Specific Streets (weight limits) 10.12.1130 — Bicycle Lanes — Placement; use by Motor Vehicles 10. 16.560 — Parking in Intersections Permitted in Certain Cases The items removed from the Parking Penalty Schedule were deleted only on the schedule, not in the Municipal Code, because either the item was a non -parking issue or the item was better encompassed under 10.08.080 Parking Signs. The item added was: Section 10.16.410 was accidentally left off the previous parking penalty schedule. The three items amended more accurately reflect the actual infractions to be cited. RESOLUTION NO 96-41C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR PARKING PENALTIES AND LATE PAYMENT FEES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS A. Recitals (i) Section 40203.5 of the California Vehicle Code requires the City of Diamond Bar to establish parking penalties for parking violations and late payment penalties for parking violations. (ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution. 2. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby adopts as its parking penalty schedule that schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" together with each penalty and other fee amount set forth therein. 3. The parking penalty schedule adopted by the City Council in Resolution 96-41(B) is hereby replaced in its entirety by this Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, this day of '1999. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 1999, by the following vote: ' AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar AMENDED EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE APRIL 21,1999 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES: Delinquency Notice Penalty $5.00 DMV Hold Penalty $48.00 Return Check Fee $15.00 PARKING PENALTIES: The following parking penalties are established for citations issued in the City of Diamond Bar by the Walnut Sheriff's Department. The first amount for each violation is the penalty if the citation is paid on "citation". The second amount is the parking penalty with the Delinquency Notice penalty. The largest amount is the parking penalty plus the Delinquency Notice penalty and the DMV Hold penalty. With With Delinquency D.M.V. # Code Section Description Penaltv Notice Hold 1) DBMC 10.08.080 Failure to Obey Parking Signs 50.00 55.00 103.00 2) DBMC 10.08.100 Parking Space Markings 50.00 55.00 103.00 3) DBMC 10.16.110 Signs Limiting Parking Time Authorized in Certain 50.00 55.00 93.00 Circumstances 4) DBMC 10.16.120 Commercial Loading Zones 45.00 50.00 98.00 5) DBMC 10.16.130 Post Office Parking Restrictions 40.00 45.00 93.00 6) DBMC 10.16.140 Depositing Mail Restrictions 40.00 45.00 93.00 7) DBMC 10.16.200 Passenger Loading 45.00 50.00 98.00 8) DBMC 10.16.210 Alleys; Parking Limits 45.00 50.00 98.00 9) DBMC 10.16.220 Temporary Restrictions Authorized in Certain 45.00 50.00 98.00 Circumstances 10) DBMC 10.16.410 Parking Prohibited 50.00 55.00 103.00 11) DBMC 10.16.440 Removal of Ignition Key when Parking 40.00 45.00 93.00 12) DBMC 10.16.450 Parking on Steep Grades 40.00 45.00 93.00 13) DBMC 10.16.460 Angle Parking 40.00 45.00 93.00 14) DBMC 10.16.470 Double Parking 45.00 50.00 98.00 15) DBMC 10.16.480 Parking Prohibitions for Specific Places; Council 45.00 50.00 98.00 Authority 16) DBMC 10.16.490 Parking Prohibitions for Vehicles over Six Feet High,45.00 50.00 98.00 Near Intersections 17) DBMC 10.16.500 Parking on Private Driveways or other Public and 45.00 50.00 98.00 Private Property 18) DBMC 10.16.510 Dual Roadways 45.00 50.00 98.00 19) DBMC 10.16.520 Parking between Curb and Adjacent Property 45.00 50.00 98.00 20) DBMC 10.16.530 Blocking Highway or Private Street 45.00 50.00 98.00 21) DBMC 10.16.540 Vehicles Transporting Hazardous Materials; Parking 335.00 360.00 408.00 Restrictions 22) DBMC 10.16.550 Blocking Driveways on Private Streets 45.00 50.00 98.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE PAGE TWO With With Delinquency D.M.V. # Code Section Description Penalty Notice Hold 23) DBMC 10.16.570 Parking Vehicles for Sale or Rent 45.00 50.00 98.00 24) DBMC 10.16.580 Special Hazard Areas; Parking Prohibition Authority 45.00 50.00 98.00 25) DBMC 10.16.590 Areas Adjacent to Schools 45.00 50.00 98.00 26) DBMC 10.16.600 Areas near Fire Hydrants on Private Roads 60.00 65.00 103.00 27) DBMC 10.16.620 Use of Assigned Parking Spaces 45.00 50.00 98.00 28) DBMC 10.16.630 Physically Handicapped Persons; Off -Street Parking 330.00 335.00 383.00 Facilities 29) DBMC 10.16.660 Taxicab Stands -Authorized Locations 25.00 30.00 78.00 30) DBMC 10.16.830 Highway Parking Requirements when Meters 25.00 30.00 78.00 Installed 31) DBMC 10.16.840 Parking Lot Requirements when Meters Installed 25.00 30.00 78.00 32) DBMC 10.16.850 Deposit of Fees Required 45.00 50.00 98.00 33) DBMC 10.16.1310 Parking in Preferential Parking Districts 50.00 55.00 103.00 34) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Commercial Vehicle Parking Exceeding 1/2 Hour 47.00 52.00 100.00 35) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 36) DBMC 10.16.150(b) Third Offense within 1 Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 37) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Vehicle Exceeding 10,000 lbs. 47.00 52.00 100.00 38) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 39) DBMC 10.16.150(c) Third Offense within 1 Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 40) DBMC 10.16.190 Trailers or Semitrailers; Parking Requirements 47.00 52.00 100.00 41) DBMC 10.16.190(a) Second Offense within 1 Year 147.00 152.00 200.00 42) DBMC 10.16.190(a) Third Offense within 1 Year 447.00 452.00 500.00 THE SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF STANDING AND PARKING LAWS CONTAINED IN THE VEHICLE CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS AS FOLLOWS: Registration/Equipment Violations: 43) CVC 4152.5 Foreign Vehicle Registration 30.00 35.00 83.00 44) CVC 4454(a) Registration Card Kept with Vehicle 30.00 35.00 83.00 45) CVC 4457 Stolen, Lost or Damaged Cards and Plates 30.00 35.00 83.00 46) CVC 5200 Display of License Plate 30.00 35.00 83.00 47) CVC 5201 Positioning of Plates 30.00 35.00 83.00 48) CVC 5201(f) Plates Clearly Visible 30.00 35.00 83.00 49) CVC 5202 Period of Display 30.00 35.00 83.00 50) CVC 5204(a) No Tabs 30.00 35.00 83.00 51) CVC 27155 Fuel Tank Caps 30.00 35.00 83.00 Registration/Equipment Violation upon proof of correction, penalty is reduced to $10.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PARKING PENALTY SCHEDULE PAGE THREE With With # Code Section Description Penalty Delinquency Notice D.M.V. Hold California Vehicle Code Violations: 52) CVC 21113(a) Unlawful Parking -Public Grounds 45.00 50.00 98.00 53) CVC 22500(a) Parking within Intersection 45.00 50.00 98.00 54) CVC 22500(b) Parking on Crosswalk 45.00 50.00 98.00 55) CVC 22500(c) Parking/Safety Zone Marked with Red Paint 45.00 50.00 98.00 56) CVC 22500(d) Parking Fire Station Entrance 60.00 65.00 113.00 57) CVC 22500(e) Blocking Driveway 45.00 50.00 98.00 58) CVC 22500(f) Parking on Sidewalk 45.00 50.00 98.00 59) CVC 22500(g) Parking along Excavation 45.00 50.00 98.00 60) CVC 22500(h) Double Parking 45.00 50.00 98.00 61) CVC 22500(i) Parking in Bus Zone 255.00 260.00 308.00 62) CVC 225000) Parking in Tunnel 45.00 50.00 98.00 63) CVC 22500(k) Parking on Bridge 45.00 50.00 98.00 64) CVC 22500(1) Blocking Disabled Access Ramp 250.00 255.00 303.00 65) CVC 22500.1 Additional Prohibited Stopping, Standing or 60.00 65.00 113.00 Parking; Fire Lane 66) CVC 22502(a) Parking 18" from Curb 45.00 50.00 98:00 67) CVC 22502(e) Curb Parking -One Way Roadway 45.00 50.00 98.00 68) CVC 22504(a) Unincorporated Area Parking 50.00 55.00 103.00 69) CVC 22505(a) State Highway Parking 45.00 50.00 98.00 70) CVC 22507.8(a) Disabled Parking -No Visible Placard/Plate 330.00 335.00 383.00 71) CVC 22507.8(b) Obstruction of Disabled Parking Space 330.00 335.00 383.00 72) CVC 22507.8(c) Parking -Disabled Crosshatches Boundary Lines 330.00 335.00 383.00 73) CVC 22510 Parking in Snow Removal Areas 45.00 50.00 98.00 74) CVC 22514 Fire Hydrants 60.00 65.00 113.00 75) CVC 22515 Unattended Vehicles 45.00 50.00 98.00 76) CVC 22516 Locked Vehicle 40.00 45.00 93.00 77) CVC 22517 Opening and Closing Doors 60.00 65.00 113.00 78) CVC 22520 Stopping on Freeway 35.00 40.00 88.00 79) CVC 22521 Parking upon or near Railroad Track 35.00 40.00 88.00 80) CVC 22522 Parking near Designated Sidewalk Access Ramps 280.00 285.00 333.00 81) CVC 22523(a)(b) Abandonment Prohibited 105.00 110.00 158.00 82) CVC 22526 Anti -Gridlock Act 60.00 65.00 113.00 83) CVC 22526 Second Offense -Anti -Gridlock Act 105.00 110.00 158.00 84) CVC 22526 Third Offense -Anti -Gridlock Act 255.00 260.00 308.00 85) CVC 22951 Street and Alley Parking 40.00 45.00 93.00 86) CVC 23333 Stopping and Parking -Vehicular Crossing 37.00 42.00 90.00 87) CVC 25300(c)(e) Warning Device on Disabled or Parked Vehicle 37.00 42.00 90.00 88) CVC 31303(d) Parking Hazard -Waste Carrier -Residential District 355.00 360.00 408.00 89) CVC 35712(x) Vehicle Exceeding 14,000 lbs. Posted 45.00 50.00 98.00 011r1w, OF Or1~10 VI7 S9ftF1 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 7.1 b TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April S, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic" SUMMARY: Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code regulates the operation of vehicles upon City streets. The parking provisions of the Title effectuate the efficient flow of traffic within the City and allows the City to improve and maintain traffic safety. The Title is being amended to clarify certain provisions of the Title and to improve traffic safety within the City. The amendments to the Title will ensure that the traffic and parking regulations are clear to persons driving within the City and improve the enforcement of existing traffic and parking regulations thus promoting safe, efficient traffic movement. This item was continued from the April 6, 1999 Meeting RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, approve for First Reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic" LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) X Ordinance(s) _ Other: _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? _ 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ X No Which Commission? _ 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Engineerinq/Public Works/Sheriff's REVIEWED BY: Ter nce L. Belang City Manager 6 e lee A. Fritzal Assistant to the City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 AGENDA NO. 7.1b TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic" ISSUE STATEMENT: Should the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony, approve for first reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. XX (1999) "An Ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar Regarding Traffic Regulations and Amending Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 - Vehicles and Traffic." FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The adoption of the Ordinance will have no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Diamond Bar Municipal Code Title 10 — Vehicles and Traffic - regulates the operation of vehicles upon City streets to protect drivers, pedestrians and others. Title 10 includes: Traffic Signs, Signals and Devices; Stopping, Standing Parking; Abandoned and Inoperative Vehicles and other related divisions. In review of the Parking Penalty Schedule, it has been determined that certain sections should be clarified so that the residents may have a better understanding of the provision and to improve the enforcement of all related parking regulations. Since the creation of the Off -Street Parking Task Force, the City has been reviewing Title 10 in regards to the enforcement of applicable parking regulations. The City reviewed Title 10 and the Parking Penalty Schedule to ensure that both documents meet the City's requirements. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the drafted Ordinance and recommends the adoption. No increased regulations are being added. Overall, the Ordinance clarifies the enforcement of the sections. A new section regarding enforcement of all parking signs is being recommended under section 10.08.080. Section 10.08.075 is the section relating to regulatory signs. Furthermore, the additions to the Ordinance are underlined and deletions are strikeeat. ORDINANCE NO. 1999 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGARDING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND AMENDING DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 10 -VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.04.010 of Chapter 10.04 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (c) to read as follows: "(c) Not withstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b), pursuant to section 40200 of the California Vehicle Code, any violation of section 10.08.080, section 10.08.100, or any provision of Chapter 10.16 shall be subject to a civil penalty in accordance with Chapter 10.50 of this Code." Section 2 Section 10.08.020 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.020 Character of signals. The city council shall determine the character of all official traffic control signals where the California Vehicle Code or California state law, regulations or requirements do not so provide." Section 3 Section 10.08.070 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.08.070 Warning and directional signs. The city engineer may place and maintain all official warning and directional signs necessary to the proper control of traffic. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs." Section 4 Section 10.08.075 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows: "10.08.075 Re ug latory Si ns The city ngineer shall place all regulatory signs and other markings required or authorized either by this Title or by finding of the city council or finding of the city engineer. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs or other markings." Section 5 Section 10.08.080 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.080 Parking Signs The city engineer shall place and maintain all signs and demarcations required or authorized pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of this title or the California Vehicle Code No person shall stop, park or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended in violation of anv sign erected or any demarcation established in accordance with this section or any restriction T stated upon any such sign or demarcation." Section 6 Section 10.08.090 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.090 Lane guidelines and other pavement markings. The city engineer shall place appropriate traffic guidelines dividing highways into the number of traffic lanes that is proper and necessary and shall place such other pavement markings as are necessary to direct vehicular movements in accordance with requirements of this title and the State Vehicle Code. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of such traffic guidelines or pavement markings." Section 7 Section 10.08.140 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.08.140 Weight limit signs; emergency procedures. If a weight limit is suspended pursuant to this chapter and a different weight limit is necessary, the city engineer shall erect and maintain, during the emergency, appropriate signs. At the end of the emergency, the city engineer shall remove such temporary signs and uncover and restore the original signs unless the city council otherwise determines. No person shall operate any vehicle in excess of the posted weight limit upon any street or highway where such signs have been erected." Section 8 Section 10. 12.010 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.010 Driver training; driving on closed streets restricted. No A person shall fK4 operate any vehicle on any portion of the highway closed to through traffic for driver training except when engaged in driver training or for the purpose of going to or from a point within the specified closed area." Section 9 Section 10. 12.070 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.070 Pedestrian tunnels; closure conditions. Whenever the city council finds and determines that the use of any pedestrian tunnel is dangerous because of the presence of loiterers, or for other reasons, and that it is not economically feasible to protect such tunnels other than by temporary closure, the city engineer shall install gates and post signs, or cause such gates to be installed, prohibiting the entrance by persons into such a tunnel during such times as the tunnel is not required by pedestrians going or from the seheel premises and the city engineer has caused such gates to be locked and has posted signs informing the public that such tunnel is temporarily closed. No person shall enter M tunnel closed pursuant to this section where such signs have been erected." Section 10 Section 10. 12.120 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.120 Flagman to regulate traffic when traffic control devices are inoperative. Whenever the city engineer finds and determines that official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable, he may regulate traffic by means of any person given temporary appointment for such duty. No person shall fail to obey any such traffic regulation when operating any vehicle." Section 11 Section 10. 12.130 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.130 Flagman at construction and maintenance areas. Whenever the city engineer finds that the regulation of traffic is necessary at the site of road or street construction or maintenance, he may regulate traffic by means of persons authorized for such duty. No person shall fail to obey any such traffic regulation when operating any vehicle." Section 12 Section 10.12.310 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (c) to read as follows: "(c) No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of this section." Section 13 Section 10.12.510 of Chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new subsection (3) to read as follows: "(3) No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such traffic control signals or signs_" Section 14 Section 10. 12.540 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.540 Yield right-of-way signs — Installation required in certain circumstances. The city engineer shall erect, or cause to be erected, yield right-of-way signs complying with provisions of the Vehicle Code at one or more approaches to an intersection of highways, which are not through highways, where the city council has determined that because of lack of visibility, or because of the number of reported accidents or the apparent probability thereof, such signs are considered necessary, and where according to the principles and experience of traffic engineering the installation of stop signs is not justified. No person shall operate any vehicle in violation of any such signs when erected." Section 15 Section 10. 12.720 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.720 Turn restrictions — Near channelization devices. (a) At locations where channelization devices have been placed and the city engineer finds that it is necessary to prohibit left turns or right turns for the purpose of diminishing the hazard of collision, he shall place appropriate signs prohibiting such left or right turns. (b) At those intersections where the city engineer has placed such signs no person _shall operate a vehicle other than as permitted by such signs." Section 16 Section 10. 12.730 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.730 Same — Other intersections. (a) At all other locations at which the city council has determined and found that the elimination of left turns or right turns is necessary to reduce traffic congestion or to diminish the hazard of collision, the city engineer shall place appropriate signs prohibiting such left or right turns. (b) At those intersections where the city engineer has placed such signs no person shall operate a vehicle other than as directed and required or permitted by such signs." Section 17 Section 10. 12.750 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.12.750 Turning around prohibited in certain conditions. If the city council finds that the volume of traffic, the width of the highway, and other traffic conditions at any intersection are such that the making of a U-turn at such intersection would create a traffic hazard, the city engineer shall erect and maintain in a conspicuous place at such intersection an adequate sign stating that such U-turns are prohibited. No person shall operate a vehicle in violation of such signs when erected.' Section 18 Section 10. 12.1120 of chapter 10.12 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.12.1120 Pedestrians and bicyclists; roadway crossing restrictions. The city engineer may place signs where it has been determined that conditions of vehicular and pedestrian or bicycle traffic are such that a traffic hazard would exist if pedestrians or bicyclists were permitted to cross the roadway at these locations directing that pedestrians and bicyclists shall not cross at a location so indicated. No pedestrian or any person operating a bicycle shall cross at any such location." Section 19 Section 10. 16.110 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.110 Signs limiting parking time authorized in certain circumstances. Whenever the city council finds that on any portion of the highway or of a private street or of any parking lot maintained or operated for the public by the city there is at any time lack of sufficient space to accommodate the drivers of vehicles and that the time of parking should be limited so that everyone may have his/her fair turn, the city engineer shall erect and maintain adequate signs along such portion of the highway specifying the limitation on the time of parking. No person shall nark or leave standing any vehicle in violation of any such sign " Section 20 Section 10. 16.220 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.16.220 Temporary restrictions authorized in certain circumstances. Whenever the city engineer finds that traffic congestion or traffic hazard is likely to result from the operation, stopping, standing or parking of vehicles during the holding of public or private assemblages, gatherings or functions, or during the construction, alteration, repair, sweeping or improvement of any highway, or for other reason, he may place or cause to be placed temporary signss prohibiting the operation, stopping, standing or parking of vehicles during the period such conditions exists and giving notice that the vehicle may be removed which sign shall be erected at least 24 hours prior to any removal. No person shall operate, ark or leave standing any vehicle in violation of any such sign " Section 21 Section 10. 16.430 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.430 Vehicles parked over 72 hours; removal by sheriff La) No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle upon a highw consecutive hours ay for 72 or more 00fb� The sheriff shall remove to a safe place every vehicle which has been parked or left standing upon a highway for 72 or more consecutive hours. {b} Lc) As used in this section, the words "safe place" include, but are not confined to, any garage, parking lot or open space owned by, maintained by or under the jurisdiction of the city, and also every privately owned garage the owner or proprietor of which will accept such vehicle." Section 22 Section 10. 16.490 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.490 Parking prohibitions for vehicles over six feet high, near intersections. Whenever the city council finds that the parking of vehicles, with a height of six feet or more, within 100 feet of an intersection, creates a visibility limitation resulting in a potential traffic hazard, the city engineer shall erect signs or markings stating that the parking of vehicles 6 with a height of six feet or more is prohibited within 100 feet of an intersection. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such prohibition." Section 23 Section 10.16.580 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows "10.16.580 Special hazard areas; parking prohibitions authority. At any place for a distance not to exceed 100 feet where the city engineer finds that parking would unduly hamper the free flow of traffic, result in special traffic hazard, or endanger public health or safety, he shall place appropriate signs or markings prohibiting such parking. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such signs or markings.' Section 24 Section 10. 16.590 of Chapter 16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.590 Areas adjacent to schools. Whenever the city engineer finds that parking adjacent to any school property would unduly hamper the free flow of traffic or otherwise constitute a traffic hazard, he shall place appropriate signs or markings prohibiting such parking. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle in violation of such signs or markings." Section 25 Section 10. 16.610 of Chapter 10.16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 26 Section 10. 16.630 of Chapter 16 of Title 10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.16.630 Physically handicapped persons; off-street parking facilities. Whenever the city council designates stalls or spaces in an off-street parking facility, owned or operated by the city, for the exclusive use of physically handicapped persons whose vehicles display either one of the distinguishing license plates issued to disabled persons pursuant to Vehicle Code §22511.5 or to disabled veterans as specified in Vehicle Code §9105, a driver of any vehicle not displaying one of the aforesaid distinguishing license plates shall not park such vehicle in such parking space. The designation shall be made by posting immediately adjacent to, and visible from, each stall or space, a sign consisting of a profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on a blue background and by outlining or painting markings in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code." Section 27 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this — day of 1999. Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on _ day of , 1999 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on theday of 1999 the following vote: by AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR , AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. �' 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 15, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TSE: RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY: Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation has requested approval of a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue into 21 single-family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, the City Council concluded its public hearing and directed the preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April 6, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation from the staff, review the alternative plan and 1) direct staff to prepare an appropriate resolution approving an extension of time; or 2) adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification X Resolutions — Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Ordinances Agreements P,a 11ILKvAL DISTRIBUTION: Applicant SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: I. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEW BY: " Terrence elanger James DeStefano City Manager Deputy City Manager X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No Yes X No X Yes No Public Works Division CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 99 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA ISSUE STATEMENT: Amrut Patel of Sasak Corporation has requested approval of a one- year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12, and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9, in order to subdivide a 6.7 acre site located on the east side of Morning Sun Avenue into 21 single-family lots. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested extension of time. On February 16, 1999, the City Council concluded its public hearing and directed the preparation of a resolution of denial. On March 16, 1999, the applicant presented a 17 lot alternative map for consideration. Continued from April6, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation from the staff, review the alternative plan and (l.) direct staff to prepare an appropriate resolution approving an extension of time; or, (2.) adopt Resolution No. 99 -XX denying the extension of time.. BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1999 the City Council began its public hearing review of a proposed extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253. The project consists of 21 units upon a site located along the east side of Morning Sun Avenue. The City Council concluded its public hearing on the request and directed staff preparation of a resolution denying the applicants request. On March 16, 1999 the City Council received a presentation from the agent, Mr. Jan C. Dabney, for the applicant, Mr. Amrut Patel of the Sasak Corporation requesting City Council consideration of an alternative subdivision map for the 6.7 acre site. The City Council continued the matter in order to permit the City staff the opportunity to review and comment upon the proposal. The following matrix has been prepared to compare the previously approved map and the proposed alternative project as proposed by the applicant. Tentative Tract Map No. 51253 COMPARISON MATRIX Revised: April 14, 1999 APPROVED 21 lot TRACT PROPOSED 17 lot TRACT Sasak Acres: 6.7 Sasak Acres: 6.7 WVUSD Acres: Total: approximately 3 acres WVUSD AcresTotal: approximately .20 acres approximately 9.7 acres approximately 6.96 acres Number of Units: 21 Number of Units: 17 Density: Average Lot Size: 2.85 units/acre Density: 11,616 square feet Average Lot Size: 2.44 units/ acre 14 696.7 square feet Avera Pad Size: 7,845 squ=Aa Average Pad Size: 8 144 feet Largest Lot Size: 17 064.9 fat Largest Lot Size 43 466.6 Kware few Largest Pad Size: 12,899 square feet Largest Pad Size: 11,707 care feet Smallest Lot Size: 7,558.7 square feet Smallest Lot Size: 7,586.3 square feet Smallest Pad Size: 6,081 square feet Smallest Pad Size: 6,070 square feet Street/Circulation: two culStreet /Circulation: two cul-de-sacstenhance from Morning Sun Ave. Morning Sun Ave. Length of Earthwork Volume: 91,400 cubic yards of cut/fill Earthwork Volume: north cul-de-sac shortened 74,400 cubic yards of cut/fill; increase in the utilization of Vegetation: 8 y approximate) 50 oak trees will Vegetation: landform techniques per the applicant -oak trees to be be removed removed will be reduced by 83% "Blueline" Stream: project will fill in "blueline" "Blueline Stream" approximately per the applicant — reduction of stream adjacent to development impacts on adjacent "blueline" Drainage: site grading off-site (on school Drainage: stream by 100% grading off-site (on school district property) for drainage district property) for drainage system Lot Frontage: All parcels t"upon the Lot Frontage: Lot Nos. 13 & 14 will front on interior streets. Morning Sun Ave. (will take WVUSD Participation: requires an agreement for access WVUSD access from Morning Sun Ave. requires agneemimt for access from Murniag Sun Avenue. Participation: from Morning Sun Avenue. Off. site Swing of Applicant will deed to WVUSD approximately 3 aces. all of Lot 10 for access to Retaining walls: maximum height approximately Retaining Walls: adjacent WVUSD property. maximum height approximately 5 & adjacent to Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 5 & adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4; 14, 15, 16; 5ft. high retaining maximum height approximately wall between Lots 16 & 17 2 ft. between Lots 4 & 5; maximum height approximately 4 ft. adjacent to Lot 11; maximum height approximately between Lots 11 & 12 Pad Elevations: Range from 677.0 (Lot 4) Pad Elevations: Range from 678.94 (Lot 4) to to 723.5 (Lot 12) 727.50 (Lot 10) City Council Report Tract Map No. 51253 The City Engineer has reviewed the alternative map and has raised issues regarding the maintenance of the undeveloped portions of lot nos. 5 and 10. Drainage responsibility should be clearly defined and designed such that surface run-off is to the adjacent street. All dwelling units should include roof drains. All lots which contain cut / fill sections through the pad should provide for an over -excavation to assure stability. The City Engineer and Planning Staff recommend that Lot Nos. 13 through 17 all front upon the same street. The relationship of the proposed lot lines and the pad delineation requires further refinement to assure proper homeowner understanding of ownership and maintenance responsibility. The applicant has requested a one year extension of time in order to fulfill all conditions of approval required prior to approval of the final map and recordation of the 21 unit tract map. The extension of time would commence from the date of the original map expiration. Therefore, with the one year extension, final map approval and recordation will be required prior to August 6, 1999. Should the applicant not complete all required conditions to receive final map approval or record the map by that date the project will cease to exist. The City Council would appear to have several options: Attachments: TB:JDS 1. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution approving the requested extension of time for the 21 lot project. Action on the Resolution to be taken at a subsequent meeting. 2. Adopt the attached Resolution denying the requested extension of time. Direct staff preparation of necessary documents to support approval of an extension of time incorporating project conditions responding to the applicants alternative 17 lot proposal. Final action to be addressed at a future meeting. - Resolution No. 99 -XX - Approved 21 Lot Tentative Tract Map - Proposed Alternative 17 Lot Tract Map 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-12, AND OAK TREE PERMIT NO. 92-9 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MORNING SUN AVENUE AND NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS. 1. The property owner/applicant, Armut Patel of Sasak Corporation, has filed an application for a one-year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9. The project site is located east of Morning Sun Avenue and north of Pathfinder Road, Los Angeles County, Diamond Bar, California, as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Extension of Time shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. On May 17, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 95-21 and 95-22 approving the applicant's project. On May 17, 1995 the map was conditioned to respond to evidence of unresolved geotechnical concerns upon the property 3. On May 19, 1995 a landslide occurred upon the applicants property. 4. The City Council approval was based on the applicant obtaining a permanent transfer of property from the Walnut Valley Unified School District to the applicant. The permanent transfer of property (approximately 3 acres) would allow the applicant access to the project site from Morning Sun Avenue and allow the applicant to expand the lot and pad size of lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, in order to comply with the required lot size and pad size. 5. The approved project would subdivide approximately 6.7 acres (owned by the applicant) and approximately 3 acres (owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District) into a 21 unit, single-family, residential development, along with the removal and replacement of oak and walnut trees and native vegetation according to the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program. 6. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL Maximum 3 Dwelling Units Per Acre). It is zoned Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size, 10,000 Square Feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -10,000-6U). 7. Generally, the following zones and uses surround the project site: to the north is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 15,000 Square Feet (R-1-15,000) Zone; and to the east is the Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square feet -6 Units Per Acre (RPD -100,000-6U) and the Walnut Valley Unified School District property; to the south is the RPD -100,000-6U Zone; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size -8,500 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone. 8. The City Council project approval expired August 6, 1998. The applicant submitted a written request for a one year extension of time, prior to the expiration of the map, as required by the Subdivision Map Act and Title 21 of the Los Angeles County Code (the City Subdivision Ordinance). 9. On November 24, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. At that time and pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to December 8, 1998. On December 8, 1998, pursuant to the applicant's request, the public hearing was continued to January 12, 1999. 10. On January 12, 1999, the Planning Commission concluded its public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 99-01 recommending City Council approval of the Application. 11. On February 16, 1999, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which testimony was received from interested parties, including the applicant. 12. Notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Land Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 27, 1999. Notice of the public hearing was mailed to 137 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January 20, 1999. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. M CCw.Asl2siadm@chle IM 2 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this City Council hereby finds as follows: (a) Due to the Tract Map's design, 3 acres of property owned by the Walnut Valley Unified School District is required for the Map's development as presented. Access to the project site through the Walnut Valley Unified School District property is essential. Without a permanent transfer of property from the School District to the applicant, the project site has no means of access. Additionally, in order to comply with the required lot and pad size, the permanent transfer of land, adjacent to the rear of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, from the School District to the applicant is also essential. Without the transfer of property, the Map cannot record. (b) The applicant has not demonstrated compliance with the conditions of approval. The following conditions of approval are required for final map approval/or map recordation: Resolution No. 95-21: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11. through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30., 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. Resolution No. 95-22: B. 2. through 5.; C. 2. and 10; E. 4., 11 through 13., and 18.; E. 1. through 3., 6. through 8., 11., 12., 16., 17., 20., 21., 28., 30.; 32., 37., 39., 46., 48., 49., 51. through 54. and 57. (c) As a result of the landslide and subsequent grading activity the physical environment has changed. Evidence has not been presented to the City Council to support a finding that the earth movement has stabilized. (d) The applicant has not demonstrated through the completion of project conditions that the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed 21 unit residential development proposed. As a result, the design of the subdivision or improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (e) Further extension of the subject map is not warranted. The applicant should prepare and file a new map that addresses the foregoing unresolved concerns. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the City Council hereby denies the Application. With the denial of the extension of time, Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, Conditional Use Permit No. 92-12 and Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9 expire and all privileges granted and related to these entitlements expire. The City Clerk shall: D,.Wew tiomoftsd512M3 nd1161999 (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of the Resolution, by certified mail, to: Amrut Patel, Sasak Corporation, 858 W. 9th Street, Upland, California 91785 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1999, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Mayor 1, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of March 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar DAMa0htiar0C*@ t51253edmwch16IM 4 J. C. DABNEY & ASSOM TES LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS 4439 Rhodelia Drive, Claremont, CA. 91711 phone: 909-398-4430 Fax: 909-398-4433 FAX TRANSMITTAL COMPANY: FAX NO: 9Q`7- &4:� / 3//7 NO. PAGES: DATE: REFERENCE: NOTE: C—�o rrccc�- Q �/crapG Lo S. �Y- _ 147 b 9G .7 5, Oc✓e% 4 -t -P <6, /44 5.tz-- 545.2 � y FAX TRANSMITTAL COMPANY: FAX NO: 9Q`7- &4:� / 3//7 NO. PAGES: DATE: REFERENCE: NOTE: C—�o rrccc�- Q �/crapG Lo S. �Y- _ 147 b 9G .7 5, Oc✓e% 4 -t -P <6, /44 5.tz-- 545.2 C I C. DABNEY & ASSOCIA TES LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS 4439 Rhodelia Drive, Clammont CA. 91711 Phone: 909-398-4430 Fax: 909-3984433 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: �!f? COMPANY: �- FAX NO: 9W- 396-- Seo -7k NO. PAGES: J DATE: all REFERENCE: NOTE: � 0 April 1, 1999 Reference: Patel, Tract 51253, Alternate Map Comparison Comparison Statement: The original map provided by Mr. Patel's Engineer, Pfeiler & Associates, required that approximately 107,800 cubic yards of material be exported off-site. The modified grading plan dated 2-12-98 prepared by J. C. Dabney & Associates provided for grading to balance on-site by incorporating the adjacent School District property thus eliminating the need to export material by truck through the adjacent neighborhood. The alternate map proposes to balance the grading by utilizing the School District property also. Comparison of Dabney Grading Plan dated 2-12-98 & Alternate Map by Dabney dated 2-20- 99. The Lot layout in the Dabney Grading Plan dated 2-12-98 is generally speaking the same as represented on the approved Tentative Map 51253 provided by Pfeiler & Associates. The Alternate Map provided by Dabney dated 2-20-99 reflects a reduction of lots from the original 21 approved to 17 lots. Lot 10 of the Alternate Map is to be transferred to the Walnut Valley Unified School District per mutual agreement. The following is a comparison between the two Dabney prepared maps: DESCRIPTION 2-12-98 MAP 2-20-99 MAP % CHANGE Overall Grading Footprint (includes School District) 9.4 acres 7.3 acres -23% School Site Grading 2.52 acres 1.25 acres -50% Intrusion into the tree area North end of project 0.54 acres 0.09 acres -83% Intrusion into Blue -line Stream area All 0 -100% Additional Pad area added to School District 0.71 acres 0.31 acres -62% Additional Terrace Drains Required above Existing +566 if +10 if -98% Additional Down Drain Required above Existing +100 if -40 If -71% Volume of Earthwork Required Area of Land Required from School District Area of Land Transferred to School District 91,400 cy 0.30 acres 9,300 sf 74,400 cy 0.20 acres 43,467 sf -20% -33% +467% CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.'. 2— TO: TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 15, 1999 FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk TITLE: Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Multihazard Functional Plan SUMMARY: The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. S.B. 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of this legislation was to improve coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities were required to comply with new SEMS regulations, which took effect in September, 1994. The City's current emergency operations plan was written before the most recent SEMS regulations were developed by the State and needs to be updated to comply with these new regulations. Approval of the proposed Plan will bring Diamond Bar into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the future. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan and authorize the Mayor to execute the Letter of Promulgation on behalf of the City. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) _ Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes X No by the City Attorney? _ 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A _ Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: RE IEW Te ence L. BelAnger J mes DeStef no Lynda Burgess City Manager Deputy City Manager City Clerk CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: April 6, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) MULTIHAZARD FUNCTIONAL PLAN ISSUE STATEMENT: To bring the City into compliance with State and Federal requirements while providing the organization with an updated document that will serve as a blueprint for emergency planning efforts in the coming years. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan and authorize the Mayor to execute the Letter of Promulgation on behalf of the City. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ILS BACKGROUND: The Standardized Emergency Management System, commonly referred to as SEMS, was introduced as a result of the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland. Senate Bill 1841 was adopted by the Legislature with an effective date of January 1, 1993. The intent of the legislation was to improve coordination of state and local emergency response in California. All California cities are required to comply with new SEMS regulations, which took effect in September 1994. Currently, Diamond Bar is operating under a Plan that was developed prior to adoption of the most recent SEMS regulations by the State. It is necessary for the City to update its plan to comply with the current regulations. The City's Emergency Services Coordinators have assisted in development of the proposed plan and have met with Area D staff to prepare a plan that meets SEMS and Federal civil preparedness guidelines. The Plan, consisting of three parts, is complete and complies with all SEMS requirements. Part One is the basic plan that addresses all general requirements of SEMS. Part Two contains all of the functional operation checklists formatted to meet SEMS requirements. These checklists outline the duties of elected officials and staff during an emergency. Part Three consists of supporting documents and reference materials related to the various management functions that would need to be performed in an emergency. The updated Plan has been approved by the State Office of Emergency Services. Attachments: 1. Letter dated February 9, 1999 from Governor's Office of Emergency Services 2. Memorandum dated February 5, 1999 containing conditions of approval specified by the Office of Emergency Services 3. Letter of Promulgation 4. SEMS Manual (transmitted under separate cover) PREPARED BY: Phil Armentrout, Emergency Services Coordinator INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager FROM: Mayor Pro Tem Debby O'Connor SUBJECT: Agenda Item 8.2 - SEMS DATE: April 19, 1999 I have had the opportunity to review the SEMS Emergency Operation Plan. It is quite obvious that a lot of time has been spent in preparing this document. I want to thank Phil and Deborah Armentrout for their thoroughness in getting this document completed. I do have the following comments and questions concerning the SEMS document that I would like to have discussed for Agenda Item 8.2 on Tuesday's City Council meeting: 1. Page: Part One — 56, Transportation Accidents. The detail under this line item is for San Dimas, not Diamond Bar. 2. Page: M-81, Why should the "Council members refrain from direct involvement with City or joint City/County/State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) activities"? 3. Do we have the "Vests" refereed to in the Checklists that identify your title in the EOC? 4. Do we have 48 hours worth of food for the City Staff? If so, where is it stored? 5. Page: 0-34, first sentence has a misspelling, "meed" should be "meet". 6. Page: P-18, Do we need to add the Inland Valley Humane Society? 7. The Organization Charts refer to a "City Council Advisory Committee". What is that? 8. Page: L-7, Says the Assistant to the City Manager will fill the position of Logistics Section Coordinator and Community Services Director will be the Alternate. However on page L-9 it has it the other way around. Which is right? 9. Page: L-30, need a space between man/personnel (second to last line) 10. Acronyms- Should we add DBARS since it is referred to in the document? 11. Do we have a list of planned shelters and occupancy of those shelters? 12. Page F-8, refers to "Accounting Manager", should that be "Finance Director"? 13. Disaster Pay Page 2. Do we have a policy to enable the city to pay overtime during a declared disaster, which could then be eligible for reimbursement by the State and Federal Government? If not, should we make one? c: P. Armentrout, Emergency Services Coordinator nbw CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO g3 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: March 31, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Continued from April 6, 1999 TITLE: STAFF REPORT ON AN EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DIAMOND BAR SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE SUMMARY: The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force (SWSTF) was presented to the City Council on July 21, 1998. In August, 1998, the City Council requested staff to fully evaluate five of the recommended programs and bring back to City Council their assessment of impact, cost, scheduling, implementation issues, and institutional impact. The staff report was presented to City Council in a study session on March 2, 1999. Based on the analysis, staff finds that the five SWSTF recommendations requiring additional study can be implemented at reasonable cost, time, and resources enabling the City to reach the year 2000 mandate of 50% diversion. The five elements for implementation include: variable rates (i.e., pay as you throw), automated collection featuring a three barrel system, yard waste collection, selecting a single service provider for the single-family residence sector, and stipulating a mandatory recycling service provision to multi -family residence housing. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the staff report and provide direction to staff concerning the key findings. Three pathways are identified, of which two are proposed for deliberation: implement the identified five program elements in either an open or exclusive hauling environment in the residential sector. No change in hauling is proposed for the commercial/industrial sector. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) Bid Specification Ordinance(s) Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the Resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed? NIA —Yes — No 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? Majority Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A — 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A — Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belang City Manager w wp8ftolid VAdba9d.SVftd Ja s DeStefano Deputy City Manag r a ' G. lu Deputy Director of Public Works MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT ON AN EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DIAMOND BAR SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE Background Staff has been evaluating key elements of the recommendations of the Diamond Bar Solid Waste Standards Task Force (Task Force) since July, 1998. The Task Force recommended specific actions on nine separate program elements. Five of these elements required staff assessment based on their projected impacts upon solid waste management systems in the City. The five elements requiring study included yard waste collection, variable rates, automated collection, mandatory recycling provisions for the multi -family sector, and selection of a single service provider for Diamond Bar's residential sector. The four elements not requiring further study included business sector recycling, educational outreach, avoiding disposal bans and mandatory provisions, and construction and demolition debris recycling. These latter four elements are already in-place or under development. Discussion The reasons for considering changes in the solid waste system include the need to meet the requirements of AB 939 which call for diversion of 50% of municipal waste from landfilling by year 2000, and the looming landfill crisis which is seeing the pending closure of the City's nearest landfill, Spadra, between December, 1999 and June, 2000. Currently, the City's diversion rate is estimated to be no more than 38%, which is 12% below the year 2000 mandate. The City has just eight months from this date to meet the 50% mandate, although the law provides jurisdictions the entire year 2000 for demonstrating compliance. Importantly, the commercial industrial sector is the source of 29% diversion out of the 38% diversion rate total, while the multi -family and single-family residential sectors are the source of one percent and eight percent diversion, respectively. The programs described herein have different milestones and implementation schedules, but overall could take up to eight months as a minimum to reach full implementation. Assuming April 6th as the start point, the earliest target date will be about December 6, 1999 to reach full implementation. This means that full impact of these programs will not be felt until mid -way year 2000. Solid Waste Recommendations April 20, 1999 Summary rage z The attached staff presentation (see Attachment 1, dated March 2, 1999, presentation from J. Michael Huls, Intergrated Environmental Services Coordinator) provides a clear description of the five program elements, the specific conditions under which they can be implemented, and a full analysis of their impact in terms of cost, diversion, implementation, scheduling, and institutions in the community. The programs as configured affect the residential sector primarily, since that sector has been found to represent the most significant potential source of diversion. In fact, the residential sector comprises 62.5% of all waste in the City, with single family residents generating fully half of all waste collected for disposal. Already, the commercial industrial sector contributes three-quarters of all diversion in the city, so further gains must come from the residents. Key findings of the staff began with concurrence that implementation of a fully automated collection system of three barrels for the separation and collection of yard waste, commingled recyclables, and refuse would greatly increase diversion, enhance the ambiance of the community, and provide the basis for "pay as you throw" pricing or variable rate. Further, staff concurred with Task Force recommendations that a variable rate would provide the necessary incentive for residents to participate in recycling, by rewarding those who recycle and prevent waste with financial incentives. It was also found that the MFR sector should share in the responsibility as well as the opportunity of recycling through code provisions rather than any specific program. Finally, it was found that selecting a single service provider for the residential sector would not negatively impact the community, and would facilitate greater collection, disposal, and waste prevention efficiencies. Staff found that the existing residential rate structure for the City rates about the average rate for area communities. Importantly, the City's programs are less and it does not receive any revenues. While the City does not now control rates, it can have a positive impact through the permitting process. Below, we have itemized local and area rates for residential monthly service. Area Refuse and Recycling Rates City Monrovia 11f £ ff 1 Sj2 7s; f12�t ..i1:: F i}f it3i S SS #133' s >51 € �;£� City Fee $ Included 1.20 I,#3 if'Ig 3 I iia Ili i3s 3#�!3' 3_ # ;:' ? Total Rate $�l 11.13 12.07 5ir N f £11# slisl€ ,=31 f ,27#' 4 Diversion 33% Unknown La Puente }3}I ( - Claremont £E5£ Included kj £,}{} .3 5 18.71 49% = k b 155 j5 xyii1; t1 Covina 3; 1 }� i5 0.58 }� � � i� �;: 12.66 s i, ,� 3:I i€ £ West Covina ', [2"d rate is x 1.30 k. . 13.87£,, 96 gallon ?kkk I}5 } } 2 barrel]`£ 3} Solid Waste Recommencaations Page s April 20, 1999 * Unless otherwise stipulated, other fee refers to recycling fees, surcharges, AB 939 fee, and unidentified costs. Recommendations Staff recommends that City Council review the attached presentation, the staff reports, and the recommendations of the Task Force, and receive input from the public at this Council meeting, regarding AB 939 program development. Staff has provided all reasonable evidence of the pros and cons of AB 939 program element implementation, and Council may take one or more of the following pathways. Decision-making is based on the need to achieve 50% diversion by January 1, 2000. One, no action could be taken. This is an approach that other jurisdictions have followed, if only by their inaction. Some cities have assumed incorrectly that meeting 50% diversion is enough. Instead, the Board has found these cities to have not made a good faith effort, and they are now under compliance order. Already, two cities that achieved 50% diversion have been placed under compliance order for not putting forth a good faith effort, meaning all of their SRRE programs were not implemented. This pathway, therefore, has been shown to result in compliance orders and fines, and represents a significant risk to the public trust. Second, the City could take a middle path, one that results in implementation of the recommended programs but in an open environment (no exclusivity). This pathway could decrease any cost impact to the public, while possibly enabling the City to reach 50%. This does increase the effort of city staff to monitor and enforce permit provisions mandating haulers to comply with code provisions. Since there would always be the opportunity for new haulers to enter into the system, costs might be kept lower, although evidence to date suggests that an open system does not necessarily result in lower rates. Third, the City could implement the recommended programs in an exclusive environment. This would reduce the impact on the city for monitoring. The City might not need to monitor larger numbers of haulers, but it would also be responsible to a certain extent for rates. The City would have to assure through negotiation or bidding that the residents receive the lowest and best rate for the service level desired. If the City were to follow either of the latter two pathways, staff is prepared to draft code revisions needed to implement the full slate of programs. A possible draft code revision is included as Attachment 2.. It is purely for discussion purposes and does not include all probable changes to the city code. Prepared by: J. Michael Huls / David G. Liu ,4174- 0y14-47 s PRESENTATION DATE: March 2, 1999 PREPARED BY: J. Michael Huls, REA Integrated Environmental Services Coordinator SUBJECT: STAFF PRESENTATION ON EVALUATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DIAMOND BAR SOLID WASTE STANDARDS TASK FORCE Background The final report of the Solid Waste Standards Task Force (Task Force) was presented to the City Council on July 21, 1998. The final report was received and included Task Force recommendations on nine separate items. Council requested staff to evaluate the recommendations, and bring back to Council an assessment of time and resources needed to fully evaluate them. Staff found that five of nine recommendations required further study and in a presentation on August 4, 1998, proposed completion of further studies within a six-month period. The items not requiring any further study included business sector recycling, educational outreach, avoiding bans and mandatory provisions, and construction and demolition debris recycling; all of these are currently in place or in progress. The items requiring further study included: yard waste collection, variable rates, automated collection, mandatory recycling provisions for multi -family residences, and selection of a single service provider for Diamond Bar's residential sector. Context There are nine months plus the remaining days of March until the California Integrated Waste Management Act's medium term deadline of January 1, 2000, which is the date that California jurisdictions are to comply with the 50% diversion mandate. We have all of the year 2000 to demonstrate compliance. The programs discussed herein have different milestones and implementation schedules, but overall could take up to eight months as a minimum to reach full implementation. Assuming March 2, 1999 as the start point, the earliest target date will be about December 1, 1999 for full implementation. This means that the full impact of these programs will not be felt until mid -way 2000. Summary of the Five Staff Reports Overall, the City of Diamond Bar (City) appears to have a "healthy" diversion rate of about 38% based on the official statistics received from the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board). However, this diversion rate is still short of the mandate of 50% by January 1, 2000 by 12%. Since the City has progressed from an estimated 9% Page 1 March 2, 1999 in 1990, this means that on average the diversion rate has increased about 4% per year. Obviously, maintaining our course as is without change will likely result in the City being far short of the expected diversion goal. Since we have less than a year to the mandated deadline, the City will have to implement substantive programs to achieve 50°x6, which means that voluntary -like programs that we previously implemented will be inadequate to the task. Additionally, our local landfill, Spadra, is set to close in June 1999, meaning that our waste will need to be transported to a more remote landfill. Already, the principal hauler in the City has informed its customers that commercial rates will rise about 10% to pay for the longer haul. The findings of the five reports are presented below with report number 5 first, then numbers 1 through 4 in their respective order. In addition, we have included a short brief of the City's current diversion rate and an analysis of our existing shortfall with respect to the 50% mandate. The waste generation brief is presented as a introduction to the five reports. Waste Generation. The most likely source of diversion in the City is the residential sector. Together, multi -family residences (MFRS) and single family residences (SFRs) compose about 62°x6 of all wastes, with single family residents alone responsible for 50% of all measured disposed wastes. MFRS are responsible for 12.5% of all wastes. Commercial and industrial wastes compose about 37.5% of all wastes, but about half of this is self -hauled waste which is not easily regulated nor identified (much of the self - hauled loads of wastes coming from Diamond Bar and other cities are simply identified as "cash accounts" at local landfills). Of the types of waste accepted at local landfills, yard waste is a readily identified component and reflects about a third of our waste stream. Nearly 90% of all yard wastes comes from SFRs. Also, SFRs currently contribute about 8% diversion to current diversion rates, and MFRs contribute less than one percent to diversion rates. Based on this, SFRs could contribute up to 18% diversion if all programs recommended in this presentation for this sector were to be implemented and we recovered the maximum extent feasible. MFRs could contribute about 4% if all programs recommended in this presentation for the sector were to be implemented and we again recovered the maximum extent feasible. The commercial/industrial sector could contribute about 7.5°x6 diversion at maximum. Realistically, we could expect about half of these levels to be achieved based on practical experience, yielding a net diversion of about 14°x6. This would be enough to slightly exceed the year 2000 mandate. Conclusion: Programming needs to be targeted primarily at SFRs to gain the most diversion at the least cost. However, all sectors must participate to enable the City to meet the AB 939 mandate looming in year 2000. Single Service Provider for the SFR Sector. Staff reviewed the options for the City in terms of a single service provider for the SFR sector. Although not explicitly required for any of the SFR programs identified above, having a single service provider enhances efforts by reducing the City's administrative time and resources required to oversee solid waste firms. Rather, time and resources can be spent on implementing educational and outreach programs designed to encourage residents to participate. The probable pathways to acquire a single service provider are to either negotiate Page 2 March 2, 1999 directly with one of the existing permittees, or to launch a bid process with the aim of selecting the most qualified hauler. Conclusion: City could extend the permit of a specific hauler or conduct a bidding process. The latter is seen as the most open and economical approach, while the former is viewed as the easiest way of getting a single service provider for the SFR sector. Yard Waste Collection. Yard waste is one of the most readily identifiable components of our municipal waste stream. It is ordinarily separated at the home in the process of gardening, then often mixed with other wastes. This gives an excellent opportunity to homeowners to simply keep yard wastes separated, then place the materials in a segregated barrel. This means that diversion should be quite high for the component, perhaps yielding about 8% diversion alone. The obstacles to green waste collection include the potential cost which could range from $2 to $4 per household, the need to distribute "green" barrels, the need for a longer term permit or a contract, and the need to integrated existing grass cycling and home composting programs into the mix. It is noted that the principal hauler in the City proposed to offer some incentive to homeowners currently composting and grass cycling if they were awarded an exclusive "right" to collect the SFRs' waste. Conclusion: A yard waste recycling program aimed at SFRs will be the single most effective program that can be implemented in the time remaining to the deadline. There is no apparent reason not to implement this program based on the analysis. Automated Collection Using Three Barrels. Several cities have opted for the look and economy of automated collection. Just recently, Walnut opted for automated collection, while Baldwin Park, La Puente, San Dimas, West Covina, Glendora, Duarte, Bradbury, EI Monte, and Covina all have chosen automated systems. The reason is simple: less labor equals lower cost. This helps to offset increasing disposal rates and longer travel times required to move waste to more remote disposal sites. In addition, the use of automated barrels has additional benefits: communities report that their neighborhoods look better with the standardized barrels, the lidded containers keep rainfall out of the refuse (reducing the net weight taken to landfill), and any type of variable rate requires standardization to equitably distribute costs. There is the high cost of purchasing the expensive barrels, especially if wastes are to be sorted into three categories; but this can be ameliorated by extending the length of time for provider's permit or contract. One significant issue is that many seniors report that they are unable to handle larger barrels. This is an area that the service provider may want to address in some innovative manner. Implementation of automated containers alone would not necessarily increase diversion. Conclusion: As a minimum, automated collection should be implemented since it is a necessary precursor to commingled recycling, yard wastes, and variable rates, all of which are slated to be implemented by the .SRRE and recommended by the Task Force. Variable Rates. Electricity, water, gas, and so many other items we purchase each day are based on the principle that the more we buy the more we pay. No one balks at the fact that usage implies greater cost. If we also consider refuse management as a utility, then its cost should be governed by buying requirements afforded gas, water, and Page 3 March 2, 1999 electricity. For those who might complain for any variety of reasons, many residents have had to subsidize their waste generating neighbors for years, so scaling rates makes a lot of sense on an equity basis. One of the key issues is how best to provide incentives to residents who significantly reduce their wastes. This may take a combination of City and hauler monitoring to document reported reduction to merit incentives. Variable rates are known to have a significant impact upon waste generation. It is believed that variable rates in Diamond Bar could generate at least similar levels of diversion to yard waste collection. Conclusion: Variable rates are a program element placed at the top of the solid waste management system hierarchy. The importance of variable rates is that it changes how residents view waste. Variable rates are an important way of rewarding those civic minded residents who take the time and energy to reduce waste and recycle materials. Mandatory Provisions for MFRS. The MFR sector is among the most difficult to implement recycling for the reasons of lack of adequate space to separate and store recyclables, the transient nature of residents in many complexes, and the low cost afforded refuse collection in many complexes in the City. However, MFRs do generate waste, up to 12.5% of the total waste generated in the City, and their recycling rates are the lowest of all three sectors. Rather than specify a specific program to be implemented by all complexes (complexes are too variable to set a single design for implementation), the City should consider setting a single standard for MFR owners and managers to follow. A single standard, say, all complexes must provide recycling access, gives each complex the option of planning and implementing the program that works best based on size, residents, space, and service type. The City can take the role of facilitator to help the hauler and the MFR management choose the method best suited for the complex. Conclusion: Prepare a change to the solid waste ordinance specifying that all MFRs must offer recycling access to residents by no later than June 30, 2000. Decision Making Pathways Decision making on the solid waste issue is predicated on the need to achieve the 50% mandate by January 1, 2000. Further, the City's existing diversion rate is only 38%; that is below the acceptable range of diversion established by the CIWMB. It is important to note that the average diversion rate in California for 1998 is estimated at 33%, which puts the City above the average. Nonetheless, the City must achieve an additional 12% by the end of year 2000, which is about 21 months from today. The programs contained in the Source Reduction and Recycling Element or SRRE, probably do not get the City to the threshold. Implementation of the full program recommended by the Task Force itself barely achieves the threshold. With this as a backdrop, there are three potential pathways that the City Council could take regards this issue. One, no action could be taken. This is an approach that other jurisdictions have adopted, instead placing the initiative upon the state to issue Page 4. March 2, 1999 compliance orders and possibly fines. This represents a significant risk to the public trust. There are two action agendas that could be taken. One, all of the recommendations could be accepted and a vote taken to authorize staff to proceed with implementation. Or, one or more of the recommendations could be approved and a motion made to staff to proceed with the more limited in scope program. These approaches entail less risk with the state, however, the latter embodies a higher risk with the state if the City were unable to achieve the mandate of 50% diversion by January 1, 2000. The state has indicated that good faith effort will play a significant role in the establishment of fines. That means the state will examine carefully what programs we have implemented or tried to implement, and our results. Already, the state has entered into compliance orders with three communities over failure to achieve the 25°x6 mandate. State board members have been heard to urge a more active and punitive stance by the board on year 2000 compliance. The very real possibility exists that the state could fine the City up to $10,000 per day for failure to meet the numerical and programmatic goals by the statutory deadline, especially if no action were ultimately taken. On the other hand, failure to implement even a portion of our programs could mean compliance orders and fines if we were to fall short of the mandate. Notwithstanding the law, the City is faced with higher costs in the long term once area landfills close which could be as soon as year 2002. Already the pending closure of Spadra in June 1999 has meant the hike of commercial fees by 10%. There exists the potential to reduce or at least maintain the level of monthly fee as currently constituted by introducing cost saving measures (automation and larger recycling containers) and increasing waste prevention and recycling (incentives are increased through variable rates and greater recycling opportunities). Even if the City were not to achieve the mandate of 50% diversion, the state could not fine the City for noncompliance since the SRRE was implemented (indicating a good faith effort). Schedule The probable schedule for implementing these measures requires a minimum of eight months. Each of the projects described above has its own time and resource demands, such as the need to modify ordinances, purchase equipment, publicize and educate the public, and obtain and select winning bids. Whatever mix of alternatives is chosen, there would appear to be the same amount of time required as different tasks can be conducted on a concurrent basis. Action No action is recommended for this meeting. The intent of the study session is to purely consider the results of the staff investigation of the Task Force Recommendations. Review and comments are appreciated. Whatever the outcome of later deliberations, Council should be cognizant of the need to implement the Task Force Recommendations or some parallel system that reflects Task Force conclusions. Any Page 5 March 2, 1999 other outcome risks significant fine and increased costs for the residential and business communities. Page 6 March 2, 1999 �sc�5sra� o Draft additions to the city code that do not include any modifications required to bring other chapter sections and subsections into conformance ORDINANCE NO. XX (1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING CHAPTER 8.16 OF TITLE 8 OF THE DIAMOND BAR CITY CODE ADOPTING REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS RELATING TO THE COLLECTION, RECYCLING, TRANSPORTATION, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE, RECYCLABLE, AND COMPOSTABLE MATERIALS. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Sec. 8.16.450. of Chapter 8.16 of the Diamond Bar City Code (DBCC) is hereby amended by adding subsections 15 through 17 to read as follows: (15) The permittee shall implement by January 1, 2000 the following program as a minimum for all single-family residential accounts. The program shall consist of a three -container system consisting of no less than one container each for yard waste (only those yard debris allowed by the County Sanitation Districts for use as Alternative Daily Cover), mixed refuse, and commingled recyclables consisting of materials to be stipulated by the City. This three -container system shall be of automated design, and as a minimum, the refuse container shall be 100 -gallon capacity, while the recycling and yard waste containers shall be of 64 -gallon capacity. Residents will be eligible to receive smaller sized refuse containers of 64 -gallon capacity upon request. All three containers must be set out on the appropriate trash day alongside the curb. (16) The permittee shall implement a variable rate structure by January 1, 2000 based on the three -container system described above in subsection 15. A set charge must be developed subject to City Manager approval based on the 100-64-64 gallon volume ratio (refuse-recyclables-yard waste). Any additional refuse containers would be charged at a set rate to be determined by the permittee and subject to approval of the City Manager. Additional yard waste and recycling containers will be made available to residents on a request basis at no additional charge, unless the request is made to replace any container lost or damaged as a result of the resident's negligence. As an incentive, residents who request smaller refuse containers (i.e., 64 -gallon capacity) shall be provided such a container and extended a percentage reduction of no less than 15% of the monthly rate. For residents who practice yard waste composting and grass cycling, and who do not require a yard waste barrel, no less than a 10% reduction in monthly fee shall also be applied, pending verification of the absence of yard waste in the refuse container and confirmation that the resident has participated in a City -sponsored home composting seminar. (17) The permittee must solicit and offer cost -competitive multi -family residential unit recycling systems to any owner/manager of MFR customer complexes. Such systems must be approved by the City Manager. Section 2: Sec.8.16.130. Special Provisions regarding method of disposal, is hereby amended by adding subsection (h) to read as follows: (h) Any owner, manager, or operator of a commercial unit which utilizes two or more bins or other containers, and/or single bins collected more frequently than twice per week, shall not place into any refuse bin any readily recyclable and/or compostable material without due cause. Such materials may be placed in a refuse bin or disposed only after all reasonable efforts have been made to reduce, reuse, and recycle said material or if diversion is economically or technically infeasible. Reasonable efforts shall be documented with the permittee along with documentation of technical and/or economical infeasibility. SECTION 3: The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of pre-emptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this revision shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in three (3) public places within the City of Diamond Bar within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the manner prescribed by Resolution No. 89.6. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF '1999. Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on this day of , 1999, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the _ day of , 1999 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 REPORT DATE: April 8, 1999 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: APPROVAL OF THE 1999-2000 CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES SUMMARY: The City Council has developed their 1999-2000 Goals and Objectives. The Goals and Objectives have been divided into two categories; immediate time sensitive and regular goals and objectives. The goals and objectives have been ranked by the Council and have 19 general categories. There are 58 goals and objectives for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the 1999-2000 Goals and Objectives. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) — Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) — Ordinance(s) X Other: Goals and Objectives — Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed NIA _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No /A Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NSA Yes _ No . 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission — Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: All City Departments REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belange Kellee A. Fritzal City Manager Assistant to the City Manager 0 0 Joe i 00 N r! rh ti �.� ti ti h N 00 �'MW gUa"W ,-�c; W W q W U C7NQ' WgryCi ,--rN� WUQW erg W C) q �L W C�M�W QUW r en W Q W pU q W W C7�tgQUtyW to � —,Z3 � O v ti O � C '� � _ � o� `ti '% � itq�= � � p ti �' '� 4Ri Gq � pVj � � � � � � Q q 4�i � • � O t:t it Z. C �. •� C '� � ''-£ O � O � O � 0) � ,� � of s. '� O w; b O � � U C b Q U O ti _� •p U CCi 7: C `n p h 5 V� V it C st y y16) y C p y pIn w w _� tU\r ani w o C h 0. S+ C col v ,• O v e C •^• O� � ti �, � V 4r 0 0 w MOMMM■ME QQ W Q4 (-� '-ot- O O O ° w h O O 'Zt O •.y o� Q o) q � h O ti v O Lir O h L y O C H O tc � �"' O +„ •� O � � y � L" C Ln w y Q Chi 0� •� 0 w MOMMM■ME WE O O O ° O O O 'Zt O •.y o� Q o) q � h O ti v O Lir O h L y O C H O WE M O R O CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Effective 3-16-99) COMMITTEE DELEGATE ALTERNATE California Contract Cities Association 19 .. Ansari Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir., 10810 Paramount, Suite 202, Downey, 90241, 562-861-3908 Meets 3rd Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30 p.m., dinner, various restaurant locations of host City. Reservations required. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority . Chang 4952 La Palma Ave., La Palma, 90623, 800-220-2343 General Board Committee meets annually each July - location to be announced CLOUT Ansari Herrera c/o Dr. Jerry Young Chaffey College, 5885 Haven Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 7:30 a.m., location to be announced East San Gabriel Valley Planning Committee DeStefano Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m., at various restaurant locations of host city. Planning Directors Sub -Committee: Meets 4th Monday of each month at 12:00 noon at Cal Poly. Foothill Transit Zone Huff Ansari Bill Forsythe, 100 N. Barranca #980, W. Covina, 91791, 626-967-3147 Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at above address. Four -Corners Transportation Policy Committee Group Huff Chang Robert Huff, Chairman - Meets as needed. Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District MacBride 12545 Florence Ave., Santa Fe Springs, 90670, 562-944-9656 Meets 2nd Thursday at address above at 7:30 p.m. L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21 Chang Huff Charles Cary, Chief Engineer & Gen. Mgr., 1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier 906014998 Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier 90601-4998, 562-699-7411 x1500 Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at District Office CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Cont'd.) (Effective 3-16-99) L.A. County City Selection Committee Chang O'Connor Larry J. Monteilh, Secretary, 383 Hall of Administration, 500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles, 90012, 213-974-1431 Meets: After the League of Calif. Cities - L.A. County Division Meeting - (Approx. 8:30 p.m.) League of Calif. Cities - L.A. County Division Chang Herrera Jack O'Neil, Exec. Dir., 602 E. Huntington Dr., Ste. C, Monrovia 91016, 626-305-1315 FAX 626-305-1345 Meets 1st Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at Almansor Court, 700 S. Almansor Street, Alhambra San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Herrera Huff Nicholas Conway, Exec. Dir., c/o Arroyo Assoc., 234 N. EI Molino, Ste. 202, Pasadena 91101- 1675, 626-564-8700, FAX 626-564-1116 Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at various locations. Executive Session 5:00 p.m. San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership of Commerce & Cities Ansari Herrera 10501 Valley Blvd., Ste. 101, EI Monte, CA 91731, 626-453-3082 FAX 818 -453-3090 r Southern California Assn. of Governments (SCAG) Chang Cson -vf- Main Office, 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, 90017, 213-236-1800 Eileen Ansari, Representative for Dist. 37 General Assembly meets annually each March - location to be announced Tres Hermanos Conservation Authority Huff, Chair c/o City of Diamond Bar, Terrence Belanger, Executive Director Herrera Chang Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority (WCCA) O'Connor Huff Joseph Edmiston, Executive Director, Contact: Andi 5810 Ramirez Canyon Road, Malibu, 90265 310 454-1395 x 106 CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEES (Effective 3-16-99) (Meet As Needed) Finance Herrera/O'Connor Cable TV Franchise Herrera/Chang Chamber of Commerce Liaison O'Connor/Ansari City Anniversary Liaison O'Connor City Council Goals/City Manager Evaluation Chang/O'Connor City on Line Technical O'Connor/Huff Community/Civic Center Task Force. Huff/O'Connor Economic Development Chang/Herrera Lanterman Expansion Herrera/O'Connor Legislative Ansari/Herrera Liaison Committee to Surrounding Cities Chang/Herrera PUSD/City O'Connor/Chang Redevelopment Ansari/Huff Senior Citizen Liaison Ansari/Herrera Sister City Huff/Ansari WVUSD/City Huff/Ansari CITY COUNCII, REPORT AGENDA NO. fl MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of e ity Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manag SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Opposing the Rate Increases for the Cable Television Service Provided by Century Communications ISSUE STATEMENT: Shall the City Council approve the Resolution opposing the rate increases for the cable television service provided by Century Communications? RECOMMENDATION: The item is being brought forth to the City Council as a result from the Cable Subcommittee's opposition to Century Communication's rate increases. It is, therefore, recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar pass, approve and adopt the attached Resolution, which opposes the rate increases for the cable television service provided by Century Communications. BACKGROUND/DIS CUSSION: The Telecommunications Act of 1996, as passed by the Congress of the United States, provided that the Federal Communications Commission would cease to review and regulate the rates charged by cable operators for the cable programming services tier effective as of March 31, 1999. The underlying premise of the deregulation of rates for the cable programming services tier was that the cable industry would be facing more competition for subscribers from satellite broadcasters, wireless cable providers, and telephone companies, thereby preventing or reducing ever -escalating increases in those rates. By letter dated March 29, 1999, which was two days prior to the federally -mandated deregulation of rates for the cable programming services tier, the City's franchised cable operator, Citizens Century Cable Television Venture ("Century Communications"), notified the City of a proposed increase in rates for its cable programming services tier and for its hourly service charges. The rates are to become effective in May 1, 1999. According to the March 29, 1999 letter, the cable programming services tier for the expanded cable will increase by 18.96%, from $15.19 to $18.07, and the hourly service charge will increase by 61.88%, from $16.16 to $26.16. Over the last three years, the rates charged by Century Communications for the cable programming services tier for the expanded cable have escalated by approximately 29%, and the hourly service charges have escalated by approximately 81%. The following chart demonstrates the Diamond Bar cable rate changes from 1997 to 1999. April 16, 1999 1997-99 1998-99 Category 1997 1998 1999 % change % chanae CABLE Basic 10.75 10.85 10.75 0.00% (.92%) Expanded 14.00 15.19 18.07 29.07% 18.96% Premium Channel 10.00 10.53 11.53 15.30% 9.50% HBO/Cinemax 17.50 17.50 17.84 1.94% 1.94% Any 2 Pre Channel 14.87 14.87 17.84 19.97% 19.97% HBO/CM w/Showtime or TMC 23.29 23.29 24.16 3.74% 3.74% Showtime/TMC w/HBO/CM 20.66 20.66 24.16 16.94% 16.94% All 4 channels 29.08 29.08 29.42 1.17% 1.17% INSTALLATION SERVICES Installation/Service hourly rate 14.47 16.16 26.16 80.79% 61.88% Installed unwired homes 41.00 45.76 40.80 (.49%) (10.84%) Installed prewired homes 20.50 22.88 24.06 17.37% 5.16% Installed addtl connection (initial) 10.25 11.58 14.39 40.39% 24.27% Inst addtl connection (separate) 20.50 22.88 23.02 12.29% 0.61% EQUIPMENT Addressible Convertor 2.38 2.39 .85 (64.29%) (64.44%) Standard Remote n/c n/c .17 Century Communications included in its letter to the City a copy of the notice to be inserted in customers' statements beginning on April 1, 1999. (The fees stipulated in the customers' notice include the franchise fee. The fees stipulated in the letter to the City Manager do not contain the additional franchise fee.) That notice to customers states in part: "As a result of increased programming costs and inflation, some of our monthly prices will change in May in accordance with the FCC regulations." The City of Diamond Bar and Century Communications have discussed the proposed rate increases. According to Century Communications, the cable rates have increased for various reasons. The quality of the cable product continues to increase, which in turn causes an increase in the operating cost. The maintenance of the system and general operating expenditures have increased over the last three years. The programming rates (i.e. the cost of channels such as ESPN and Discovery) have increased. In addition, Century added two channels within the last six months (Fox Sports West 2 and Fox News). Over the last three years, the cost of insurance, employee benefits and wages have increased. Overall, Century Communications stipulates that the pricing represents the value and the variety of the services offered. 2 April 15, 1999 As discussed previously, Congress deregulated the telecommunications industry with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The 1996 Telecommunications Act was initially proposed to increase competition in the cable industry, thus controlling the cable rates. However, the increased competition has failed to materialize and the cable rates have risen. Therefore, the effective relief for subscribers from unrestrained and ever-increasing rates imposed by cable operators, such as Century Communications, can be provided only through legislation at the federal level of government. The attached Resolution expresses its opposition to the increase in rates to subscribers that are proposed to be implemented by Century Communications, as set forth in the notification from Century Communications dated March 29, 1999. Also, the Resolution requests that the Congress of the United States reauthorize the Federal Communications Commission to receive and to act upon complaints from consumers and local franchising authorities with regard to rates charged by cable operators for the cable programming services tier, and that new legislation be adopted that will encourage competition among video service providers. It is believed that new legislation and the assurance of competition among video service providers will protect the public from the escalation of cable rates. Furthermore, it is proposed that the attached Resolution be sent to Senators' Feinstein and Boxer; Congressman Miller; Members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation; Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection; Members of the Federal Communications Commission; and the General Manager of Century Communications. Prepared by: Kellee A. Fritzal/Anne Haraksin 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OPPOSING THE RATE INCREASES FOR CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES PROVIDED BY CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS WHEREAS, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as passed by the Congress of the United States, provided that the Federal Communications Commission would cease to review and regulate the rates charged by cable operators for the cable programming services tier effective as of March 31, 1999; and WHEREAS, the underlying premise of the deregulation of rates for the cable programming services tier was that the cable industry would be facing more competition for subscribers from satellite broadcasters, wireless cable providers, and telephone companies, thereby preventing or reducing ever -escalating increases in those rates; and WHEREAS, by letter dated March 29, 1999, which was two days prior to the federally -mandated deregulation of rates for the cable programming services tier, the City's franchised cable operator, Citizens Century Cable Television Venture ("Century Communications"), notified the City of proposed increases in rate and s for its cable programming services tier and for its hourly service charges, which increases will become effective in May 1999; WHEREAS, Century Communications included in its letter to the City dated March 29, 1999, a copy of the notice to be inserted in customers' statements beginning on April 1, 1999. That notice to customers states in part: "As a result of increased programming costs and inflation, some of our monthly prices will change in May in accordance with the FCC regulations."; and WHEREAS, the rate charged by Century Communications for the cable Programming services tier will increase by 18.96%, from $15.19 to $18.07, and the hourly service charge will increase by 61.88%, from $16.16 to $26.16; and WHEREAS, over the last three years, the rates charged by Century Communications for the cable programming services tier have escalated by approximately 29%, and the hourly service charges have escalated by approximately 81 % -- substantially in excess of the nationwide inflation rate; and WHEREAS, the City Council isacutely aware that competition among video service providers has failed to materialize and that effective relief for subscribers from unrestrained and ever-increasing rates imposed by cable operators, such as Century, Communications, can be provided only through legislation at the federal level of government. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council expresses its opposition to the unwarranted and unjustified increases in rates to subscribers that are proposed to be implemented by Century Communications in connection with its cable programming services tier and its hourly service charges, as set forth in the notification from Century Communications dated March 29, 1999. Section 2. The City Council requests that the Congress of the United States reauthorize the Federal Communications Commission to receive and to act upon complaints from consumers and local franchising authorities with regard to rates charged by cable operators for the cable programming services tier, and that new legislation be adopted that will encourage competition among video service providers and thereby protect the public from the continuing and unbridled escalation of rates, fees, and charges for equipment, installation, and service. Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit certified copies of this Resolution to the following: U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein U.S. Congressman Gary G. Miller Members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection Members of the Federal Communications Commission General Manager of Century Communications, Ms. Nancy Hanks Stinson Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, this day of , 1999. Mayor - 2 - I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar - 3 - CENTURY C COMMUNICATIONS CaWe Division 'o%6 L\ coming Street Walnut. CA 9175) March 29, 1999 Mr. Terrence Belanger City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Fared and mailed to (909) 861- 3117 Dear Mr. Belanger: Effective May, 1999, the rate charged for basic cable will decrease from $10.29 to $10.21. The rate for expanded basic will change from $14.42 to $17.17. And the following is a list of premium services, equipment and installation charges that will change: Premium Services Old Rate New Rate Any one (1) service — HBO, Cinemax, Showtime or The Movie Channel $ 10.00 $ 10.95 Premium Packages HBO and Cinemax $ 16.53 $ 16.95 Any other two (2) combination $ 14.13 $ 16.95 HBO and Cinemax with Showtime or The Movie Channel $ 22.13 $ 22.95 Showtime and The Movie Channel with HBO or Cinemax $ 19.63 $ 22.95 All four (4) premium channels $ 27.63 $ 27.95 Installation and Service Charges Installation of unwired home $ 45.73 $ 38.76 Installation of prewired home $ 22.88 $ 22.86 Installation of add'l connection (same trip) $ 11.58 $ 13.67 Continued c:\R1Nt3DB99AR10.d0C March 29, 1999 Installation and Service Charges cont. Old Rate New Rate Installation of add'] connection (sep. trip) $ 22.88 $ 22.86 Hourly service charge $ 16.16 $ 24.85 Equipment Charges Remotes Standard Remotes $ .00 $ .16 Converters Addressable $ 2.39 $ .81 Attached is the notice that will be inserted in customers' statements beginning on April 1, 1999. Here at Century Communications we are constantly working to bring the highest -quality service to our customers. We're dedicated to offering a wide variety of choices in entertainment, local and national news, sports and information. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (909) 595 - 7344, ext. 238. Sin erely, Nancy anks S inson General Manager cc: Kellee Fritzal, City of Diamond Bar enclosure c:\R1M3D1399AeI0.doc _ x66es3 12112tno10 �C4m11 MCa nOATS Dkww Bat Dear Century Customer. Since our founding 25 years ago, Century Communications has been committed to offering you quality programming and reliable service at a reasonable prise Today& we offer guaranteed, on time service and more viewing choices than ever bcf including original programming like Btarapity on A&F, RuM* on M ckelodeon, CAAPs Leary iKiag Lim, and Shark N3ek on Discovery In fact, if you compare Century to other sources of television programming yau'B find that we offer a combination of value, variety and service you won't fond anywhere else. As a result of increased programming costs and inflation, some of cur monthly prices will change in May in accordance with FCC regulations A revised pricelist and a new channel lineup are printed on the reverse side of this notice. At Century, we greatly value you as a customer. That is why we are dedicated to ensuring that service from Century is now, and will continue to be, your best entertainment value. Sincerely Century Communications C+aft7 Ce®oirudem 20965 *oniq Stunt, Walnut, CA (909) 594.2729 Locally Toll Fuc Available 24 Hours Lobby lbws Mm, Tues., Wed. 8e Fri.: 8:00 am to &00 pm Thum; 8:00 an to 1:00 pm Sat.: 9A0 an to 3:00 pm Alnd.and.Lrt.iade I f -.Lae ire lout. FuNisBE AMnottn Cm w DauaO in Office of City Manager 21660 E Copley Dr., Suite 100 Diamond Bay CA 91765 FCC ID it CAI 394 909-396-5690 (Ad Nw Rate Rate Limited Bark 510.85 E10.75 Expanded Basic Premum Seldom 15.19 18.07 HBO. Cinemax, Showtime or TMC 10.53 1153 Ns HBO and Cinemax 17.50 17.84 An7 other two Premium Service combination 14.87 17.84 HBO and Cinemax with Showtime or TMC 23.29 24.16 Showtime and TMC with HBO or Cinemax 20.66 24.16 All Four Premiums Services 29.08 29.42 lastalWan red Sardoa C hwW Hourly Service Charge 16.16 26.16 Installation ofunwired Home 45.76 40.80 Installation of Prewired Home 22.88 24.06 Installation ofAddl Connection (Initial Install) 11.58 14.39 Installation ofAdd7 Convection (Separate Install) 22.88 23.02 Equipmat C hWW Addressable Converter 2.39 0.85 Standard Remote — 0.17 C+aft7 Ce®oirudem 20965 *oniq Stunt, Walnut, CA (909) 594.2729 Locally Toll Fuc Available 24 Hours Lobby lbws Mm, Tues., Wed. 8e Fri.: 8:00 am to &00 pm Thum; 8:00 an to 1:00 pm Sat.: 9A0 an to 3:00 pm Alnd.and.Lrt.iade I f -.Lae ire lout. FuNisBE AMnottn Cm w DauaO in Office of City Manager 21660 E Copley Dr., Suite 100 Diamond Bay CA 91765 FCC ID it CAI 394 909-396-5690 X666M 82112700.10 DIAMOND BAR Aaof hday 1, I9D9 O 0 AivateSelctiass/Adult • 29 ESPN F -Vu —S (PPV) • 30 CNN O 1 Century Select Ticket 2 (PPV) n 131 HBO n 2 KCBS ♦ 32 Gnemax 0 3 7V Cuide Channel * 33 Dsssy Channel 0 4 KNBC A 34 The MovieChannd C) 5 K71'A ♦ 35 Shownme C7 6 KPXN (UHF 30) * 36 FOX Sports Wet 7 KABC * 37 FOX Sports Wet 2 8 KOCE (UHF 50) 038 Cettury Select Ticket 1 (PPV) C) 9 KCAL * 39 AMC -American Movie Classics, 10 KDOC (UHF 56) * 40 Nickelodeon 11 KTTV 041 FOX Famuly Channel 12 CPAC Local Origination * 42 lifetime 13 KCOP 943 7heNishvilleNetwork C) 14 KLCS (UHF 58) 044 The Weather Channel 15 KCEI (UHF 281 * 45 Discovery Channel 16 I xel School Access 946 Supentation TBS C) 17 MusrsicipalAeces/C"psn 947 BEI' -Black Ent rtanment7V 18 KSCI (UHF 18) * 48 Haedline News 19 KHSC (T -W46) * 49 ESPN2 20 KTBN (UB40) 950 IntemationaWADEChatnel 21 KMEX (UHF 34) * 51 CIBC 22 KWHY (UHF 22) * 52 'ihaHistory Chamd 23 KVEA (UHF 52) * 53 M7V C) 24 KRCA (UHF 62) * 54 VHl C) * 25 LISA Netw ,,k n * 55 C -SPAN * 26 WON Chicago C) 056 FOX News Chamd * 27 A&E 0 57 Century Select Ticket Prawave * 28 TNT - Turner Network Telension RLL SGWKE NCRIES EIYIEB Uw Al* EXMNIR UK CIIOB -------- A Pra0 Clmxal O C x" Soled richt (�` � n AwdeblelaStaeo------- A PUII, 2"C L .........................................$28.82 EQUm m C ladsdes [unkind Basic and Expanded Basic Addtsawble Comate.............................30.85 channels(*). StatdafdRancb ..30.17 LEkf D RASCC... ..... ....................._ ......$10.75 Broadcast, cable and local otos eAmoek. RiSpf] A110NAlD lOIVIQ` HowiyS'ervaro (barge ..........................326.16 8UPFJlAIIpO Inahlleticerof Uawirai Home._ . .--- .. _..$40.80 .............---.......__......_.......FIiFE 21 Clamed Ptd Service. ImtaBsuonofAevwedHor e, ..............,$24.06 Installation efAddl Camctioa (lmitiellast&M ..................................$14.39 FREbm m smym (RgvmmAdissWCaaav) InstallationefAdd7 Oomaction . ................._...V3.W HBC, Gonna, Showasa, or TheMevie Chanel _..........(each) $11.53 CfrM C7.LtjtG Additional IV Outlet (laahnation Fee Regained) Charge 4 �t Aocnum ........Nits Late IseymmtFie _. -_,_,. ::::...............34.75 PFZMR IFACZAM P-WissdCheckFor, .._ ...................$20.00 (P-1— en A"a cgs Caasaror) Anytwo P§%21vm Serum ....................$17.84 ADY three Pnemam Services ...............424.16 All finer Premium Smices .... __.......... V9.42 caelln > (PATr�xvrwp ceaMy SoledTfdst Ides,bs ....3lries very^ Century SisdTIcI;aEvmh........$ Per Event" Priwne swwbons . (Adult pmrsormasg) ..........3 Aires Vary - "Am a cheviot 57 fm p,assaad sckaifedc Al aevfsa aces anaam61Y unapt wbseimdeadd 1,7 •. N sdsaedehsasedad. fasehue, fa acav for rues hsed vada, odor Urea .lah franehass $e not %vhm". Ram end clesgar ere subset ball afire, a"6.bL ay, coma abbe and fadeal fee, aadk, tans. A dammtd 2096—Lemaed Hasa, Is wnla%. to Ced M hxr tecaoe hub olhoushdds mdr 1ha CanLryAssrem Plan (CAPI. �" Mme' •COM 13,900 c�N�rtzY C011?MUNICAZ'IONS CnbJe DJvtr[nn pp March 29. 1999 Mr. Torrence Belanger REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME City Manager #PAGES COMMENT 1 City of Diamond Har 3-29-99 3:45PM 2'30" 21660 Bast Copley Drive. Suite 100 Diamond Sar, California 91765 Forced wird eraifed re. (90Dj Bbl - 3JI7 Dear Mr. Halanger: $tfective May. 1999, the rate charged fbr basic cable will decrease from 31 0.29 to 510.21. The rate fbr expanded basic will change from $14.42 to 517.17. And the fbllowing is a list oFprezziiurn services, equipment and installation charges that w511 change: Premium Services Old Rate New hate Any one (1) service - 1EIB0. Cinemax. Showtime or The Movie Channel S10.00 S 10.95 Premium Paeiuses i380 and Cinemax S 36.53 $26.95 Ary other two (2) combination S14.13 S1695 1-M4D and Cinemax with Showtime or The Movie Charnal S22.13 $22.95 Showtime aril The Movie Channel with kM4D or Cinemax S 19.63 322.95 A11 four (4) premium channels S27.63 327.95 Inssaliasion sued Seevlee Cifarges Installation ofunwirsd home $45.73 $36.715 Installation of prewired bome S22.88 $22.86 Installation oFadd'l cormaction (same trip) $21.58 S13.67 Cantimu" o:�xsansvwaiu.aee TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT COUNT # 4 *** SEND *** (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 3-29-99 3:45PM 2'30" 4 TOTAL 0:02'30" 4 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council de VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manae-, FROM: Linda G. Magnuson", Finance Director DATE: April 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 with the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $6,000. Discussion: In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement #13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 and 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING ADVANCE AND RERABURSEMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER 13 WITH THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby finds, determines, resolves and orders as follows: SECTION 1. The Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 for Administrative and Overhead Expenses, attached here to as Exhibit "A", is hereby approved. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute such Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 for and on behalf of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1999. Mayor I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 AGENDA NO. q, 3 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Mana4y � -4-1 SUBJECT: Special Legal Services Re: Lanteman Developmental Center Forensic Facility Project BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: The City Manager has contacted the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter and Hampton LLP, specifically Jack H. Rubens, regarding representation of the City of Diamond Bar relative to the Lanterman Developmental Center Forensic Facility Project. The City Manager has authorized an expenditure in the amount of $5,000. The City Council directed the City Manager in Closed Session to contact Mr. Rubens and extend the special services assignment. This longer term retention requires further action of the City Council and a budget adjustment. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council enter into a contract and authorize special legal services with the firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, in an amount not to exceed a total of $50,000 and to allocate $50,000 from the General Fund unallocated fund balance reserves. RECJEvCLU1JMENT AGENCY Or THE CITY Cr DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 6, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Ansari called the meeting to order at 11:48 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, Vice Chairman Huff, Chairwoman/Ansari. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director; Mike Jenkins, Agency Attorney; David Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications & Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Finance Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/O'Connor moved, AM/Herrera seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Chang, Herrera, O'Connor, VC/Huff, Chair/Ansari NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - None 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES 3.1.1 Joint Public Hearing of March 16, 1999 with D.B. City Council - as submitted. 3.1.2 Regular Meeting of March 16, 1999 - as submitted. 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated April 6, 1999 in the amount of $15,395.30. 3.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TREASURER'S REPORT - month of February, 1999. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Chair/Ansari stated that as a result of the Redevelopment Agency, there is a possibility of 2,000 new jobs coming into the City. APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 2 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Chair/Ansari adjourned the meeting at 11:50 p.m. ATTEST: Chairman LYNDA BURGESS Agency Secretary DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Ansari and Board of Directors te FROM: Linda G. MagnusorP,' Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, April 20, 1999 DATE: April 15, 1999 Attached is the Voucher Register dated April 20,1999 for the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VOUCHER REGISTER. APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated Ap-il 20, 1999 have been reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the Following funds in these amounts FUND DESCRIPTION PREPAID 610 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 700,000.00 REPORT FOR ALL FUNDS 700,}00.}0 APPROVED BY: Eilean R' Ansari Finance Director Chairman Terrence L. Belang�r � Executive Director Vice Chairman VOUCHERS 6,780.59 6,780.59 TOTAL 706,780.59 706,780.59 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chair and Board Members of the Redevelopment Agency VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manak/ FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Finance Director DATE: April 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 in the amount of $6,000. Discussion: In September 1996, the Redevelopment Agency proceeded with a redevelopment plan adoption process for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. Included within this project area is the Gateway Corporate Center. The $6,000 requested in this Advance and Reimbursement Agreement #13 will be used to fund real estate economic cost/benefit analyses and reports related to the development of office buildings on Lots 22 and 23 located within the Gateway Corporate Center. The primary tenant of this office complex is Allstate Insurance, a Fortune 500 company, which will house an estimated 1,000 employees. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER 13 WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR The Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency hereby finds, determines, resolves and orders as follows: SECTION 1. The Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13, for Administrative and Overhead Expenses, attached hereto as Exhibit 'W, is hereby approved. The Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute such Advance and Reimbursement Agreement Number 13 for and on behalf of the Agency. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1999. Chairman I, Lynda Burgess, Secretary of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: AGENCY MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, Secretary REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD REPORT AGENDA NO..9' V-1 C, .-Z MEETING DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Honorable Chairman and Agency Board Members FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Man SUBJECT: Amendment to Real Estate and Economic Analysis Consultant Services Agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group Related to Lots 22 & 23 of Gateway Corporate Center BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency (DBRA) has retained Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) to provide real estate and economic consulting services to the DBRA related to Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center (Opus/Allstate Project). Additional authorization is necessary as a result of professional services rendered in response to final negotiations with Opus. Board authorization is required to amend the existing contract compensation from $20,000 to a total of $26,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors approve an amendment to the existing agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for real estate and economic consulting services, related to office complexes on Lots 22 & 23 of the Gateway Corporate Center, in an amount not to exceed $6,000. It is further recommended that Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Board authorize and direct the Executive Director to execute the amendment. ,82 Inland Valley Chino Don Lugo to hold 11 th academic pep rally Don Lugo High School will hold its 11th annual Renaissance Academic Pep Rally on Monday. The event will take place at 10:45 a.m. in the Don Lugo gym. The pep rally will recognize more than 800 students for their academic achievements. During the first semester this year, 803 students made the honor roll. Twenty-five seniors have achieved a 4.0 grade point averake during the course of their ilemesters at Don Lugo. The, staff member of the year, who has made a significant difference in students' lives, will also be honored at the event. training Programs. _ Another boo square feet would be added for a game roomthat woWd be done to have a 1950s diner theme. Monica Ro&iyws isoe► ss«-sno Diamond Bar rr, 3 seniors scorerfect 1600s on their ATs Three Diamond Bar High School seniors scored a perfect cr, 1,600 score on their Scholastic Aptitude Test. . Monique Cho, Jeff Huang and Nancy Li were among the 95 students in California who received the top scores in math and verbal sections during the 1997-1998 school year. This is the third year that at least one Diamond Bar High student received a perfect 1,600 on the college entrance exam. Huang, who applied to Boston University's 7 -year accelerated medical program, plans to specialize in either neurosurgery or cardiosurgery. Cho was recently accepted to Stanford University but is undecided about her major. Li has been accepted by UC Irvine and UC Berkeley. She plans to major in biology and possibly puiaue a career in research. isos► 404MI Ontario More road closures slated For I-10 lanes and ramps Alternating westbound and eastbound lanes of Interstate 10 will be closed during late night hours from Grove Avenue to Interstate 15 from today through Saturday. There will also be periodic closures of on- and off -ramps at Haven, Milliken, Archibald and Vineyard avenues and �1 Fourth Street. Th be through traffic sides of the freew. consecutive ramp closed at the sam. The westbound ramp closures wil tonight and be nit p.m. to 5 a.m. On eastbound side th will be from 11 p. and start on Mon, closure schedule < will be from 11 p. and the Saturday be from 8 p.m. to The lane and re are to allow grind barrier placemew median work. Information: (8 1010. Pomona Commerce. The forum incl and closing state Correctlo, It is the poli Inland Valley Bulletin to co, factual error F the newspaper will be public. possible. Erro called to the o city editor at NEWS.