HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/2/1997Citti
co"Cl
AGENDA
Tuesday, September 2, 1997
6:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Mayor Bob Huff
Mayor Pro Tem Caro l Herrera
Council Member Eileen Ansari
Council Member Clair Harmony
Council Member
City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
Gary Werner
Terrence L. Belanger
Michael Jenkins
Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports, or other written documentation relating to agenda items, are on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item,
please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk
a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
ni.�e��►�ir ic.�r 1
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking The City of Diamond Bar uses re cled paper
in the Council Chambers. 1 and encourages you to do the same.
t`
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member of the public may address the
Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in writing to the
City Clerk.
As a general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in
order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their
presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or the
total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the
business of the Council.
Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks toward Council Members or other persons. Comments
which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City
Council and will not be tolerated. If not complied with, you will forfeit your remaining time as ordered by the Chair.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public
comment on items previously considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Committee meetings)
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least
72_ hours prior to the Council meeting. In cases of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Council may act on an item that is not on the posted
agenda.
CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect
to a regular or special meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council.
A. Disordery behavior toward the Council or any member of the thereof, tending to interrupt the due and orderly
course of said meeting.
B. A breach of the peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly
course of said meeting.
C. Disobedience of any lawful order of the Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from
addressing the Board; and
D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL
Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72
hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer
through a phone modem.
Every meeting of the City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal
charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public
speaking area. Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business days
in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Information (909) 860-2489
NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA.
1.
2.
THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY JONES INTERCABLE
FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 12, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM,
YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS
MEETING WILL BE RE -BROADCAST ON THE SATURDAY FOLLOWING
THE COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:00 A.M. ON CHANNEL 12.
CLOSED SESSION:
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Next Resolution No. 97 -63
Next Ordinance No. 07 (1997)
None
6:30 p.m. September 2, 1997
Mayor Huff
Pastor Rick Motz, Diamond Bar
Evangelical Free Church
Council Members Ansari,
Harmony, Werner, Mayor Pro Tem
Herrera, Mayor Huff
Mayor Huff
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: None
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public Comments is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments,
pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take
any action on items not listed"on the posted agenda. Please
complete a Speaker s Card and give it to the City Clerk
(completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five
minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - September 9, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - September 11, 1997
- 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - September 16, 1997 - 6:30 p.m.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 TOWN HALL MEETING - ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION - September
30, 1997 - 6:30 -9:30 p.m., South Pointe Middle School
Multi -Purpose Room.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 PAGE 2
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
6.1.1 Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 - Receive &
File.
6.1.2 Regular Meeting of July 29, 1997 - Receive &
File.
6.1.3 Regular Meeting of August 5, 1997 - Receive &
File.
Requested by: Planning Division
6.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated
September 2, 1997 in the amount of $866,602.86.
Requested by: City Manager
6.3 TREASURER'S REPORT - Submitted for the City Council's
review and approval is the Treasurer's statement for the
month of July, 1997.
Requested by: City Manager
6.4 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT TRAIL ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVE
GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT: SYCAMORE CANYON
PEDESTRIAN/BIKE ROUTE - The City is submitting an
application for the 1997/98 FY Trails Acquisition &
Development Competitive Grant Program. The purpose of
the grant project is to provide a pedestrian/bike route
in Sycamore Canyon from Diamond Bar Blvd. to Golden Spgs.
Dr. The route will traverse the scenic canyon. This
proposed pedestrian trail is in accordance with the
General Plan Resource Management Element Strategy 1.3.7.,
"Pursue development of an integrated trails system within
the community." The City, if awarded the grant, will
administer the grant and be reimbursed for all costs
associated by the State of California. The proposed
project cost estimate is $157,000.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX approving the
application for grant funds for the Sycamore Canyon
Pedestrian/Bike Route.
Requested by: City Manager
SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 PAGE 3
6.5 APPROVAL OF THE REVISED WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
RESERVOIR CAPACITY AND ACREAGE SUPPLY CHARGES FOR PANTERA
PARK - Walnut Valley Water District has both Capacity and
Acreage Supply charges for all developable parcels of
land within their District. Usually these charges are
paid in full by the developers during development. When
the housing tracts were developed in the Pantera Park
area not all the reservoir capacity and acreage supply
charges were paid. the overall Tentative Tract 37075 was
approved in December, 1980. Pantera Park consists of two
parcels in separate tracts. One of the parcels (Lot 60)
had the water charges paid and water meters installed.
The second and larger parcel (Lot 10) did not have the
water charges paid and water meters installed. The City
was notified by Walnut Valley Water District that the
water charges would be $50,359.95 or $2,465 per acre. In
an effort to reduce the water charges the City prepared
a Lot Line Adjustment. The Lot Line Adjustment
modified/enlarged (Lot 60) to include all proposed
improvements of the park and Lot 10 was reduced to
incorporate the hillside and undeveloped portion of the
park. The City is required only to pay water charges on
the parcel to be developed (Lot 60). With the Lot Line
Adjustment the Water District has recalculated the water
charges to be $27,065.70, which is cost savings of
$23,294.25. The water charges are included in the
Pantera Park construction budget.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council authorize the City Manager to approve a Purchase
Order and payment to the Walnut Valley Water District for
Reservoir Capacity and Acreage Supply Charges for Pantera
Park in the amount of $27,065.70.
Requested by: City Manager
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters
can be heard. None
8. OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL
VEHICLES OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON
BOTH SIDES OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD TO
ITS EASTERLY TERMINUS AND THE PAINTING OF 150 FEET OF RED
CURBS AT THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON
STREET AT LINCOLN AVENUE - In order to mitigate noise
that is created by semi -trucks with refrigeration units
parked on Washington St., the Traffic and Transportation
Commission and staff recommend the parking prohibition of
commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from
SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 PAGE 4
parking on both sides of Washington St. from Brea Canyon
Rd. to its easterly terminus and the painting of 150 ft.
of red curbs at the southwest and northeast corners of
Washington St. at Lincoln Ave. All residents/businesses
along Washington St. and the Shea Business Center have
been invited to attend the Council Meeting.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX prohibiting commercial
vehicles over five tons from parking on both sides of
Washington St. from Brea Canyon Rd. to its easterly
terminus and the painting of 150 ft. of red curbs at the
southwest and northeast corner of Washington St. at
Lincoln Ave.
Requested by: Public Works Division
8.2 SECOND READING ORDINANCE NO. 06(1997): AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING DIVISION 2 OF CHAPTER
12.00 OF TITLE 12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS - At its meeting
on August 19, 1997, the City Council approved for first
reading, Ordinance No. 06(1997) to prohibit golf in the
City's public parks, except for areas designated for this
purpose. This is the second reading of the ordinance.
The ordinance will be effective in 30 days.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve for second reading, by title only, waive
full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 06(1997) amending
Division 2 of Chapter 12.00 of Title 12 of the Diamond
Bar Municipal Code relating to Park Rules and Regulations
to prohibit golf in the City's public parks.
Requested by: Community Services Division
9. NEW BUSINESS:
9.1 CITY MANAGER COMPENSATION AND CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS -
A contract amendment with the City Manager for the
purpose to include a definition for Involuntary
Termination for Cause, creation of a Comprehensive
Administrative Leave, and contribution by the City to Cal
PERS for military buyback on behalf of the City Manager.
Further, a salary range is proposed for the City Manager
classification, and Schedule A of Resolution 96-53C is
proposed to be amended.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve (1) Modification to the City Manager's
Agreement as set forth in the memorandum dated September
2, 1997; and (2) Amendment to Schedule A of Resolution
SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 PAGE 5
No. 96-53C.
Requested by: City Council
RECESS OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next Resolution No. R-97-16
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Werner
ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Harmony,
Herrera, VC/Huff, C/Werner
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public Comments is the
time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the
public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your
comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency generally
cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted
agenda. Please complete a Speaker s Card and give it to the
Agency Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary).
There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the
Redevelopment Agency.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR: None
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Agency
Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting.
AGENCY ADJOURNMENT:
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS:
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Members
are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this
meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future
meeting.
12. ADJOURNMENT: In memory of Joe Whitzman, longtime resident
who leaves behind wife Jean and a son and daughter-in-law.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: DATE: I' ;Z -
ADDRESS: PHONE: % J J/
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
L
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
/I �:;, 11 �-z -- r(--- -- 17! �;- � - I - -11 �- - -
Signature
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Regular Meeting in
the AQMD Auditorium, located at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond
Bar, California at 6:30 p.m. on September 2, 1997.
I, LYNDA BURGESS declare as follows:
I am the City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that a copy
of the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar City
Council, to be held on September 2, 1997 was posted at their
proper locations.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and
that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 29th day of
August, 1997, at Diamond Bar, California.
/s/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
(0 1, 1
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 22, 1997
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. at the
South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Fong.
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Also Present:
Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad,
Commissioners Fong, Goldenberg and McManus
Deputy City Manager James DeStefano, Senior
Planner Catherine Johnson, and Associate
Planner Ann Lungu.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of July 8, 1997.
VC/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/McManus to approve the
minutes of July 8, 1997 as submitted. The motion was approved
4-0-1 with C/Fong abstaining.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. Parks Master Plan Update.
DCM/DeStefano stated the Parks Master Plan is scheduled
for review and possible approval at the July 24, 1997
Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. If the Plan is
approved, it will be reviewed by the City Council on
August 5, 1997. If the City Council approves the Plan,
the Planning Commission will be asked, on or about August
19, 1997, to find that the Plan conforms with the City's
General Plan. The document will then be returned to the
City Council for final approval in September, 1997.
NEW BUSINESS - None
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Draft Development Code (Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 97-1)
Article I: Purpose and Applicability of Development
Code
Article VI: Development Code Administration
Article VII: Definitions
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
SP/Johnson presented staff's report. Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission review Articles I, VI and
VII of the Development Code and make an informal
recommendation. A formal recommendation will be made at
the conclusion of the review process.
Ron Pflugrath, AICP, Urban Design Studio, presented an
overview of the Development Code process.
Paul Crawford, AICP, Crawford Multari & Starr, presented
Article I of the Development Code.
VC/Schad asked if Section 22.01.030 applies to remodels
and room additions.
Mr. Crawford responded that Section 22.01.030, Page I-4,
is a general statement that describes what authority,
under California law, the City is using to prepare and
adopt this document. This section does not operate on
individual pieces of property or projects.
Chair/Ruzicka asked if the title Community Development
Director will remain in the document since the City has
undergone a reorganization.
C/Goldenberg asked for a more detailed explanation of
Section 22.01.040 E. 1., Page I-5 and I-6.
Mr. Crawford responded that this section is intended to
address what happens to projects that are in the pipeline
when this code is adopted and replaces the Los Angeles
County Zoning Code under which the City currently
operates, and what happens as amendments occur in future
years. Subsection E. 1. deals with applications that
have been filed with the City before an amendment occurs
and are determined to be complete. As worded, the
subsection says that the application may be processed
according to the requirements in effect when it was
accepted as complete by the City, unless the review
authority (Planning Commission, Planning Department,
etc.) determines it is necessary to apply new or amended
development standards to the project approval, in order
to ensure public health, safety, welfare, and orderly
development. This gives the City an opportunity to take
another look at the project in the event that it raises
substantial issues regarding health, safety or welfare
and apply appropriate standards on that basis.
Mr. Crawford responded to VC/Schad that the Planning
Commission will be reviewing sections and requirements
regarding tree removal in Article III which will be
presented to the Planning Commission at a future date.
C/Fong asked if Article I is standard throughout other
cities.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr. Crawford responded that the provisions which refer to
State Law are standard. The suggested wording is a
compilation of previous work and draft language proposed
by staff as a result of the Diamond Bar General Plan.
C/Goldenberg asked if the completed Development Code
document will be electronically accessible by the general
public.
DCM/DeStefano responded that a specific component of The
Planning and zoning Alliance's employment by the City was
that this document would be designed to be electronically
accessible via the Web site.
VC/Schad asked if any of the Building Code provisions
will be included as part of the Development Code.
DCM/DeStefano stated that the City's Building Code
regulations are contained within a separate document.
The City utilizes the latest version of the State's model
codes.
DCM/DeStefano stated that as a result of the City's
reorganization, a Community Development Director title no
longer exists. Staff is working with the City's Attorney
to redirect responsibilities to the Deputy City Manager.
C/Goldenberg suggested that Section 22.030.020 - Rules of
Interpretation, Page I-13, include "or designee" so that
A. reads: Authority. The Community Development Director
or designee shall have the responsibility and authority -
etc."
VC/Schad asked about the time frame for Development Code
amendments and divisions of responsibility for the City's
construction approval process.
DCM/DeStefano suggested the Planning Commission consider
approval thresholds for various levels within the City.
For instance, the Planning Commission may chose to remove
certain items from Administrative Development Review
process and assume those items for deliberation.
Conversely, the Planning Commission may chose to abdicate
some of its responsibilities to the Administrative
Development Review Hearing Officer. An amendment to the
zoning Ordinance generally requires extensive analysis by
staff and at least one public hearing before the Planning
Commission and one public hearing before the City
Council. The process requires a minimum of 120 days to
process with the entire procedure taking closer to nine
months to complete.
There was no one present who wished to speak on Article
I.
Bruce Jacobson, Jacobson & Wack, presented Article VI.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
DCM/DeStefano recommended the Planning Commission
carefully consider the City's lines and levels of
authority for projects. A permit type and related
decision making authority matrix will be presented to the
Commission for review at a future Development Code
meeting.
VC/Schad asked what happens if a project is approved,
construction does not commence as scheduled, and
amendments are made to the code which would require
changes to the project.
Mr. Jacobson responded that the Community Development
Director would have the authority to grant reasonable
changes. Major changes may be subject to a new permit
and public hearing process.
Mr. Jacobson explained to C/Fong that this document does
not attempt to cover the responsibilities of the City's
Building Official with respect to the issuance of
building permits.
Chair/Ruzicka stated that the completion of the City's
Development Code is compliance with Title 22 and not the
City's entire Municipal Code.
Mr. Jacobson concurred with Chair/Ruzicka. Title 22,
when adopted, will be referred to as the Diamond Bar
Development Code. The document will contain Zoning and
Subdivision provisions.
C/McManus asked if non -conforming use would apply to
historical sites in perpetuity.
Mr. Jacobson responded that all sites are protected in
perpetuity so long as the owner does not voluntarily
cause termination of its use.
Mr. Jacobson responded to Chair/Ruzicka that the State
has deemed that home care facilities are single family
homes. Therefore, in 'the event of loss, the same
structure could be rebuilt.
C/Goldenberg asked that the document contain language
specifying who is responsible for monitoring deed
restricted time limitations.
DCM/DeStefano responded that the City maintains a tickler
system to monitor time sensitive permit provisions.
Currently, information pertaining to properties within
the City is maintained in various files within the City
offices. At some future time, the information will be
coordinated and accessible by parcel number.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
C/Goldenberg asked
He asked if permit
priority basis.
DCM/DeStefano to propose a solution.
information should be compiled on a
DCM/DeStefano indicated the City is currently
computerizing the records management portion of its
operation. The cost to purchase or create a records
management system is prohibitive and has not been the
City's priority.
DCM/DeStefano recommended the Commission give careful
consideration to the public hearing notification process.
C/Goldenberg asked if tenants will be included in the
notification process.
Mr. Jacobson responded that some communities include
renters and tenants in the notification process even
though it is not a State minimum requirement. Item D,
Page VI -21 gives the Director an opportunity to enhance
the notification process in any manner deemed appropriate
by virtue of the application being processed.
DCM/DeStefano cautioned that "additional notice" is
subject to interpretation. The Commission may wish to
set more specific parameters.
C/Goldenberg asked the Commission to enter into further
discussions regarding notification to renters.
C/McManus asked if cities have distinguished between
public hearing items that effect structures and public
hearing items that effect humans.
DCM/DeStefano stated he is not aware of any such
distinctions.
Mr. Crawford stated he is not aware of any such
distinctions. However, he encouraged the Commission to
discuss the matter and determine whether to codify
"additional notice" or continue to allow the Director to
use his discretion. He cautioned the Commission that
codification may override discretion by the Director.
Chair/Ruzicka stated he favors keeping the Development
Code as simple as possible while addressing concerns.
Mr. Crawford suggested that if the process requires an
Environmental Impact Report the Commission may wish to
increase the notification provisions because there may be
additional impacts.
Chair/Ruzicka asked if Mr. Crawford can suggest how this
concern is addressed by other municipalities.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr. Crawford stated that several communities
automatically notify tenants as well as property owners.
He indicated he is not aware of communities imposing a
threshold other than a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report as a reason for increased
notification.
VC/Schad suggested a matrix be included to address
different types of projects and applicable notification.
Mr. Crawford suggested the matrix be a department policy
directive rather than a part of the Development Code.
C/Goldenberg asked staff to prepare its recommendation
for Item D. Additional notice on Page VI -21 to be
presented at the July 29, 1997 Planning Commission
meeting.
C/Fong stated he believes the notification radius depends
on the project. At a minimum, the abutting property
owner should be notified. With respect to installation
of antennas, people within sight of the project should be
notified. A major development such as the SunCal
development should involve most of the City. Other
variables such as noise impacts and visibility should be
considered in the notification process.
Chair/Ruzicka asked the Commissioners to consider this
item for discussion at the next meeting.
Clyde Hennessee asked how Article VI, Page 13, non-
conformance due to parking, applies to home additions.
Mr. Jacobson responded that this requirement deals with
the reuse of an existing building or a change to an
existing building. If the building was legally
constructed and operated, and no longer meets parking
requirements for a new use, if it is a residential use,
no change is required as long as the number of dwelling
units is not increased. Any changes to a non-residential
use would require parking conformance.
Thom Pruitt, Pop Warner Football and Cheerleading
Association Executive Vice President, stated his
organization is interested in the use of public lands
within the City and the proposed Development Code. The
youth involved in this organization are future Planning
Commissioners and administrators of Diamond Bar who will
be implementing the adopted Development Code.
Chair/Ruzicka indicated the Planning Commission will
continue its discussion of Articles I, VI and VII at the
July 29, 1997 meeting.
RECESS: Chair/Ruzicka recessed the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
RECONVENE:
Chair/Ruzicka reconvened the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50314, Conditional Use
Permit No. 96-1, Oak Tree Permit No. 96-1 and Zone Change
96-1 & deir 97-1 (pursuant to Code Sections Title 21,
22.56.215, 22.26 Part 16 and 22.16, Part 2) are requests
to approve a 15 lot subdivision on approximately 44
acres. The average lot size will be 2.92 acres. Six of
the proposed lots are part of two approve tracts.
Therefore, VTTM 50314's development will result in a net
increase of 13 residential lots. The project site is
within Los Angeles County Significant Ecological Area No.
15. The Zone Change will convert the current zoning of
A-2-2 to R-1-20,000 to a zoning of R-1-40,000.
Project Address: Southeast of the most southerly
intersection of Steeplechase
Lane and Wagon Train Lane.
Project Owner/Applicant: Kurt Nelson, Windmill
Development, 3480 Torrance
Boulevard, Suite 300, Torrance,
CA 90503
AP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends that
the Planning Commission open the public hearing, receive
comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and
project entitlement, and continue the public hearing to
August 12, 1997.
Michael Houlihan, AICP, Michael Brandman Associates,
presented the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50314 (VTTM 50314).
Mr. Houlihan responded to C/McManus that riparian oaks
are proposed to be replaced at a minimum 3:1 ratio and
upland habitat associated oaks are proposed to be
replaced at a minimum of 4:1 ratio.
VC/Schad recommended that the Mexican Elderberry be
retained during development because it is a prime food
source for the mammal wildlife. He indicated that
although it is not mentioned in the DEIR, Hairy Fringepod
is found within the tract and because it is scarce and
enjoys compatible growth with black walnuts he would like
to have it retained within the tract. He said that
although he has never seen a Mariposa Lilly in the area,
it is a perfect growth setting for the plant. He asked
about the developer's consideration of scrub oak. He
said the report did not mention Crotalus Pacifica or the
alligator lizard. He asked if any natcatchers are found
in the area.
C/Fong referring to the California Parks and Recreation
Department letter contained in the DEIR and to Paragraph
C7 on Page 9, asked when the survey was conducted and if
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
it was timed to adequately incorporate all species. He
asked if the 9 hours spent by two biologists (see Page 9,
C8) was sufficient to adequately conduct the survey.
With respect to Page 9, C9, the Parks and Recreation
Department has indicated this project will have a
significant impact on the flora and fauna in the area.
He asked how the Commission should determine whether the
State or the consultant's assumptions are correct. He
indicated he feels the consultant's comments are not
adequate.
C/Fong continued referencing the design plans. He asked
about accessibility of the hiking trail to the general
public and where is the trail head located. The plans
indicate a realignment of the Schubarum Trail at the
southerly portion of the site. The hiking trail crosses
an intermittent stream at the southwest corner of the
site and asked if a culvert will be constructed at that
location. At the southeast portion of the site just west
of the lift station, the earth structure retention basin
appears to be linear and non -conforming to the natural
contour of the land. He asked that the structure be
altered in the final grading plan to incorporate the
natural contour. He referred to Sheet 2 of the proposed
Landscape Mitigation Plan indicating there does not
appear to be any proposed landscaping or revegetation of
the area. He asked that this area be reviewed to be
certain that the area is properly revegetated.
C/Fong stated it appears that only California black
walnuts are proposed to be planted along the slope (Sheet
T-2). He asked if scrub oak is proposed to be included
with the California black walnut in the area so that the
outer slope will be similar to the natural vegetation in
the undisturbed areas. Referring to Sheet 2 for the
Landscape Mitigation Plan, he suggested including a
symbol or key on the legend to indicate Coast Live Oak
and black walnut because it is difficult to determine on
the drawings what species are included.
Tom Leslie, Michael Brandman Associates, stated that the
reconnaissance surveys were conducted during the period
when the potential sensitive plant species that could be
found in the area would be flowering and identifiable.
The sensitive species were listed in the flora
compendium. The project proponent indicated that any
species the Commission felt might be important to be
included in a landscape plan would be considered. With
respect to the survey hours, there are no standard number
of hours per acre. The Fish and Wildlife service that a
competent surveyor can look at So to 100 acres per day
per surveying biologist. This project is less than 50
acres. He stated he believes that two biologists present
on the survey days for nine hours is more than adequate
to cover the site. He referred C/Fong to Page 13 of the
DEIR, Appendix D Biological Reconnaissance Survey Report.
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
He indicated the surveys were conducted in May and July
during the time when the sensitive species could have
been identified if they had been present.
C/Fong was excused from the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
VC/Schad commended the developer for the propagation
programs he has established to replace vegetation on the
site. He said he is not aware of any other developer who
has given a project such consideration.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
Kurt Nelson, Windmill Development, presented an overview
of the project and explained how the grading plan for the
proposed project will render the area considerably more
stable than what currently exists. He also explained how
the Master Environmental Impact Report for the site and
the tracts immediately adjacent to the proposed project
were updated in the Spring of 1995.
VC/Schad asked how the proposed project will handle its
runoff.
Lex Williman, Hunsaker & Associates, responded that
pursuant to the mitigation monitoring, this project will
incorporate pollution basins similar to those installed
on the adjacent tracts. He explained how the basins will
function indicating that as a result, nuisance water will
not flow into Tonner Canyon.
Mr. Williman and Mr. Nelson explained to Chair/Ruzicka
how the significant amount of grading contemplated for
this project will render the area significantly more
stable than it currently exists and how the project will
mitigate any possibility of future landslides in the
area.
CE/Wentz reiterated that the area is currently
susceptible to landsliding. When the project is
completed, it will eliminate those areas that are
potential landslide areas.
Chair/Ruzicka continued the public hearing to August 12,
1997.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
DCM/DeStefano stated that the City Council approved, at its last
meeting, Second Reading for the Redevelopment Project Area
adoption. The Council approved a 12 month Conditional Use Permit
for the Darrin Drive cell site. The Council approved the wireless
telecommunications facilities moratorium with directions for staff
to craft an ordinance. The Council approved a slurry seal project
JULY 22, 1997 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION
for Area 7 (generally the area on both sides of Sunset Crossing
Road west of the SR 57. The Council denied the Ranch Festival's
request for use of Peterson Park. Staff was directed to work with
the Ranch Festival to locate a more suitable site.
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As presented in the agenda with the addition of the August 5, 1997
Planning Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, C/Goldenberg moved, C/McManus seconded, to adjourn the
meeting. Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. on July 29, 1997 in the South Coast Air Quality Management
auditorium.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
Attest:
/s/ Joe Ruzicka
Joe Ruzicka
Chairman
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 29, 1997
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. at the
South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Associate Planner Lungu.
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Also Present:
Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad,
Commissioners Fong, Goldenberg and McManus
Deputy City Manager James DeStefano, Senior
Planner Catherine Johnson, and Associate
Planner Ann Lungu.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of July 22, 1997.
C/Fong requested the following changes: Page 6, Paragraph 4,
Line 4 to read: "of antennas, people within sight of the
project should be". Page 8, Paragraph 2, last sentence to
read: "Referring to Sheet 2 for the Landscape Mitigation
Plan, he suggested including a symbol or key on the legend to
indicate Coast Live Oak and Black Walnut because it is
difficult to determine on the drawings what species are
included.
VC/Schad requested that the spelling of Hairy Fringepod be
corrected on Page 7, Paragraph 5, line four.
C/McManus made a motion, seconded by C/Goldenberg to approve
the minutes of July 29, 1997 as amended. The motion was
approved 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS - None
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Draft Development Code (Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 97-1)
continuation of Article VI - Development Code
Administration, and Article VII - Definitions
Bruce Jacobson, Jacobson & Wack, continued the Article VI
discussion with Item B. 3, Page VI -21, to whom mail
notice would be sent.
JULY 29, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
C/McManus asked if renters/tenants can be distinguished
from property owners in any given area of the City. He
indicated it may be advisable to notify renters/tenants
where a high volume exists and where the project may
effect this segment of the population.
Mr. Jacobson responded that the major concern is for
consistency. He cautioned that in lieu of a written or
verbal policy and by including more people in the notice
process that an applicant may have grounds for reversal
of the decision.
Chair/Ruzicka stated he is concerned about future
application of this paragraph.
Mr. Jacobson stated the City may defer adoption of a
policy, monitor application and establish a policy within
a six month time frame.
C/Goldenberg suggested language to include renters for
projects that concern traffic or safety and health of the
residents.
Mr. Jacobson responded that the level of safety may be
difficult to determine in the abstract. A trigger might
be the project's inclusion of an environmental impact
report (EIR).
Chair/Ruzicka reiterated his concerns that any future
Director or designee should, in the event that the
Planning Commission is not pleased with the notification
process, be aware that the Commission may suggest a
change to the Development Code.
Mr. Jacobson again suggested that the City's departments
operate under the regulations as they are written for a
prescribed period of time. If the Commission determines
that inadequate notice is being given, it may then
suggest a Development Code amendment. This document,
once adopted, will continue to be subject to change.
DCM/DeStefano suggested that the document remain as
written and that staff provide a policy statement for the
department to be considered by the Commission for
inclusion in the notice process within the Development
Code document. The City's Community Services Department
and Public Works Department routinely notify residents
and business owners in the immediate area of the project.
DCM/DeStefano responded to C/McManus's question regarding
the City's ability to determine renters/tenants as
opposed to property owners that it would be difficult
except for the pockets of rental units within the City.
JULY 29, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
The City would be most likely to send out dual notices -
one to the property owner and one to the renter/tenant.
Ron Pflugrath, Urban Design Studio, presented a brief
overview of Definitions Chapter VII.
DCM/DeStefano responded to C/McManus that the Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) section of the code implements provisions of
the City's General Plan which calls out a ratio from .25
(commercial) to 1.0 (the Gateway Corporate Center).
C/Goldenberg asked if Residential Care Facilities are
included in the "Medical Services - Extended Care (land
use)" category.
Mr. Pflugrath responded that these facilities are
considered in the Single Family Dwellings (land use)
section of the code on Page VII -36.
C/Goldenberg recommended the code refer directly to a
Residential Care Facility use with cross reference to
Single Family Dwellings (land use).
DCM/DeStefano responded that staff will add a definition
for Residential Care Facilities.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/Goldenberg that the term
"Granny Flats" is not contained within the code but that
the type of unit is referred to under "Secondary
Residential Units (land use)" on Page VII -34.
C/Goldenberg requested that the code refer directly to
"Granny Flat" with cross reference to "Secondary
Residential Units (land use)".
Mr. Pflugrath responded that certain categories of
definitions such as signs and adult business are
contained within specific chapters and not within the
general "Definitions" Article.
C/Goldenberg asked that the term "light manufacturing" be
contained within Article VII.
Mr. Pflugrath offered that he would consider the matter
of "light manufacturing" when the "use tables" are
presented for further discussion.
C/Goldenberg said he did not find the term "computer"
contained within Definition Article VII.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
There was no one present who wished to speak on this
item.
JULY 29, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
The Commission concurred to accept Articles I, VI and VII
with recommended changes and additions.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
C/Goldenberg referred to a resident's request to reschedule the
August 5, 1997 Development Code meeting to avoid conflict with the
City Council meetings.
Following discussion, the Commission concurred to maintain the
Development Code Public Hearing Notice meeting schedule that was
previously agreed upon by the Commission.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
1. Preview of Development Code Articles III and IV.
Bruce Jacobson, Jacobson & Wack, previewed Article IV.
He indicated Article III and IV will be presented at the
August 5, 1997 meeting.
C/Goldenberg asked the Commission to consider including
a "garage sales" regulation within the Development Code.
Mr. Jacobson responded to VC/Schad that Article III
identifies the standards for dish antennae.
There was no one present who wished to speak on this
item.
2. DCM/DeStefano stated review of the Parks Master Plan is
not scheduled for the August 5, 1997 City Council
Meeting. A Town Hall Meeting will be scheduled for
public review of the document.
3. DCM/DeStefano stated that on August 5, 1997, the City
Council will consider the Darrin Drive wireless
telecommunications facility resolution of approval for a
one year term. On August 19, 1997, the City Council will
consider extension of the 45 day telecommunications
moratorium.
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As presented in the agenda.
JULY 29, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, VC/Schad moved, C/Fong seconded, to adjourn the
meeting. Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. August 5, 1997 in the South Coast Air Quality Management Board
Hearing Room.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ James DeStafano
James DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
Attest:
/s/ Joe Ruzicka
Joe Ruzicka
Chairman
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 5, 1997
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. in the
South Coast Air Quality Management Board Room, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Recording Secretary Dennis.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad,
Commissioners Fong, Goldenberg and McManus
Also Present: Deputy City Manager James DeStefano, Senior
Planner Catherine Johnson, Associate Planner
Ann Lungu and City Attorney Jenkins.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Debbie O'Connor stated that with respect to the Parks Master Plan,
misstatements have been made to the public during Redevelopment
petition signature gathering. She referred the Commissioners to
Exhibit 5.1 Capital Improvement Plan of the Parks Master Plan which
states one of the funding sources for improvements, including
recreational trail improvements, community center, sports parks,
comes from the Redevelopment Agency.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of July 29, 1997.
C/Goldenberg made a motion, seconded by C/McManus to approve
the minutes of July 29, 1997 as submitted. The motion was
approved 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS - None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Draft Development Code (Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 97-1)
Article III - Site Planning and General Development
Regulations, and Article IV - Land Use and Development
Permit Procedures.
Bruce Jacobson, Jacobson & Wack, presented an overview of
Article IV - Land Use and Development Permit Procedures.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
DCM/DeStefano left the meeting at 6:25 p.m. to attend the City
Council meeting.
C/Goldenberg was excused from the meeting at 6:30 p.m. to
participate in City Council ceremonies.
C/Goldenberg returned to the Planning Commission dais at 6:50
p.m.
C/Fong asked if the Development Code spells out the
maximum retaining wall height.
Mr. Pflugrath responded that retaining wall information
is discussed in Article III - Hillside Management.
C/Fong requested that the Planning Commission discuss
retaining walls during the Article III presentation.
Chair/Ruzicka asked if an enclosure on top of a room
addition at the rear of a residential structure would
fall under Minor Conditional Use Permits. He asked if
residential property room additions are considered under
minor Conditional Use Permits.
Mr. Jacobson responded that if the room additions are
proposed to be within the allowable building envelope and
not intruding into the allowable setback or exceeding the
allowable height, no discretionary permits would be
required.
SP/Johnson responded to VC/Schad that the Development
Code is interpreted to balance the rights of neighbors
and the rights of the property owner. It is difficult to
disapprove a project when the property owner is
constructing within the setbacks and height requirements.
Chair/Ruzicka said he believes staff should caution
property owners to act prudently.
SP/Johnson responded to C/McManus that surrounding
property owners would be notified about projects that are
subject to Administrative Development Review.
Mr. Jacobson stated that if the project is allowable and
does not describe the need for discretionary review, no
notice will be given and the neighbors may not be aware
of the project until construction begins. During review
of Article III, it is incumbent upon the Commission to
look at the standards and decide which, if any, may need
to be revised.
Chair/Ruzicka reiterated his concern for staff to include
questions or statements to the property owner
contemplating room additions such as, whether the
AUGUST 51 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
property owner has asked his neighbors if the proposed
room addition might adversely effect them.
Mr. Jacobson suggested that building envelope numbers
could be tightened to more frequently trigger a
discretionary permit for certain types of activities such
as rear yard accessory structures. If the property owner
builds within what is proposed in the document before the
Commission, the addition is non-discretionary. The
standards could be changed through this public hearing
review process to limit the amount of building on a
residential or commercial site. There are many ways to
regulate building coverage and minimize view and privacy
intrusion.
Bob Zirbes complimented the consultants on their proposed
Development Code.
Mr. Jacobson responded to Mr. Zirbes that the City does
not enforce CC&R's. Mr. Jacobson stated definitions for
both "Neighborhood or Area Plans" and CC&R's will be
provided in Chapter VII.
Mr. Zirbes asked for an expanded definition of
"materially injurious" such as "due to its design,
appearance or use" found on Page IV-13, Item E.
Mr. Zirbes asked for inclusion of a definition of "view"
called out in Item 7. on Page IV-10.
Following discussion, the Commission concurred that due
to the City's unique topography, "view" is an important
issue and should be more thoroughly discussed in the
Development Code document.
Mr. Jacobson indicated that in order to protect "views",
an element would need to be added to Article III. The
question would be whether the City would have the comfort
level in regulating and saying "no" to a project that
would impact a single person's view versus the ability
for the landowner to use the land in the way the City's
General Plan allows them to use the land.
SP/Johnson pointed out that the City's Planning
Department and Planning Commission have discretionary
authority and can exercise sensitivity in the negotiation
of projects.
Mr. Pflugrath indicated the consultants will work with
staff to provide the Commission with documentation and
copies of other city's ordinances for perusal.
C/Fong asked if staff has read the document and has any
suggestions to offer.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
SP/Johnson again explained that the version of the
Development Code now before the Commission is a result of
cooperative effort between the consultants and the
Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning staff.
Staff has had ample opportunity to include
recommendations and offer corrections to the document.
The existing review thresholds are codified in the
current document. She asked the Commission to consider
the current thresholds for the review process and whether
it wishes to make changes.
Chair/Ruzicka stated he is comfortable with the
thresholds contained in the document.
SP/Johnson responded to C/Fong that the Development Code
is meant to be a fluid document.
The Commission concurred to accept Article IV with
recommended changes and additions.
Mr. Pflugrath requested the Commissioners forward their
recommendations with respect to punctuation, spelling,
grammar and syntax of the document to staff.
Ron Plugrath, AICP, Urban Design Studio, present an
overview of Section I of Article III - General Property
Development and Use Standards.
C/Goldenberg asked that "whenever possible" be added to
A. 5. on Page III -6 so that it reads: "on-site roads.
On-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered
periodically with reclaimed water whenever possible, or
stabilized in an environmentally safe manner;".
Mr. Pflugrath responded to Chair/Ruzicka that with
respect to Exterior Lighting C. on Page III -7, the code
does not apply to single-family residential uses.
Chair/Ruzicka asked that E. 1. on Page III -7 be corrected
to read: "Light fixtures shall not be located closer
than 10 feet to the nearest property line.".
Chair/Ruzicka stated he believes the code should address
security lighting for single-family residential use.
C/Goldenberg asked that the last sentence under Exterior
Lighting A. on Page III -7 be changed to read: "Generally,
pole -mounted fixtures shall be low in height or equipped
with light shields (See D. shielding.) to reduce or
eliminate light spillage beyond the project's boundaries.
C/Goldenberg asked that Item E. 3. on Page III -8 be
corrected to read: "Light fixtures shall not be located
more than 18 feet from the court surface.".
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
C/Goldenberg ask if commercial lighting, such as golf
course lighting, should be included in Item E. 6. on Page
III -8.
C/Goldenberg asked if the hours of operation should be
expanded to include weekends and/or holidays under Item
E. 7. on Page III -8.
C/Goldenberg asked for inclusion of a graphic explanation
of the "Height Measurement and Height Limit Exceptions"
Chapter on Pages III -8 and III -9.
Mr. Pflugrath indicated that a graphic will be provided
within the Hillside Ordinance in addition to this
chapter.
C/Goldenberg asked that "community" be added in place of
"public in line 4 of the opening statement of the Open
Space for Commercial Projects chapter on Page III -9 so
that the last sentence reads: "The intent is to make the
pedestrian environment more pleasant through the
provision of community open spaces, plazas, courtyards,
etc.".
C/Goldenberg asked that a space be inserted near the end
of the second sentence of C. Open space bonuses. under
Open Space for Commercial Projects on Page III -10 to
separate available and at.
Chair/Ruzicka pointed out that with respect to the
Screening and Buffering section, the Gateway Corporate
Center is in full view of several homes along the
ridgeline. He stated he is concerned about neon signs on
buildings. The Commission denied a request for a second
sign for the University of Phoenix which was overturned
by the City Council. He asked how this section will
protect the homeowners from blight due to rooftop signs
and apparatus such as air conditioning units, antennas,
etc. when the center is built out.
Mr. Pflugrath stated this section can provide that
rooftop mounted equipment must blend architecturally with
the structure. He indicated language would be added to
Screening and Buffering B. Mechanical equipment. on Page
III -10, to require consideration of views from above the
structure. The Sign Ordinance addresses glare and light
emission from signs.
C/McManus stated he believes parapet roofing would be the
best solution for screening equipment. He further stated
that in his opinion, there should be no rooftop signage
in the Gateway Corporate Center.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/McManus that this section of
the Code deals mainly with new construction.
C/Goldenberg asked that the Commission give further
consideration to camouflage with respect to Page III -11,
Item E. 2. Fences.
VC/Schad said he is concerned about sidewalk safety with
retail store doors opening directly into the parking lot.
Mr. Pflugrath suggested inclusion of a requirement to
provide a separation of a designated number of feet
between vehicular travel lanes and front building
entries.
C/McManus suggested that commercial buildings build the
front entrance out and provide entry through the side
rather than from the front.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/Fong that the requirement
for commercial parking lot landscaping is contained
within the Parking section.
Chair/Ruzicka asked for inclusion of a setback chart or
graphic.
C/Goldenberg asked if Section B. 1. a. refers to the roof
overhang or the structure as the nearest point.
Mr. Pflugrath responded that the measurement is from the
face of the wall.
C/Goldenberg requested the first sentence, line 2 of B.
4. b. on Page III -12 be correct to read 11 ... parallel to
and at a maximum distance from the front lot
line.... etc."
C/Goldenberg requested that Item B. 5. Nonparallel lot
lines be stated more clearly or eliminated entirely.
Chair/Ruzicka asked Mr. Pflugrath to reconsider
paragraphs B. 4. b. and 5. on Page III -12 for further
clarification (chart or graphic) or rewrite.
Mr. Pflugrath concurred with C/McManus that "and" should
be changed to "or" near the end of the third line of
Paragraph B. 5. on Page III -12.
Mr. Pflugrath explained to C/Fong that the side yard and
rear yard setback requirements are contained in Article
II - Property Development Standards.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, Chair/Ruzicka recommended "as
defined in Article II" be added at the end of B. S. on
Page III -12.
C/Goldenberg suggested minimums of three feet be included
in Section D. 2. c. and 3. b. 3) on Page III -13.
The Commission and the consultants concurred that the
Code should address "solar devices" as a separate
category. See Item D. 2. on Page III -13 continued from
page III -12.
C/Goldenberg asked for reconsideration of Item D. 4. d.
2) on Page III -13.
Mr. Pflugrath suggested that the sentence be rewritten as
follows: "The height of guard rails shall be as required
by the Uniform Building Code (UBC)".
Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/Fong that satellite dishes
and antennae is covered under the Telecommunications
Chapter. Usually, such devices are not allowed within a
setback area.
RECESS: Chair/Ruzicka recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
RECONVENE: Chair/Ruzicka reconvened the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
C/Goldenberg pointed out that D. 4. g. 2. on Page III -14
should be corrected by eliminating "and" at the end of
the paragraph and ending the paragraph with a period
following "parcel".
Craig Clute asked if the code section referring to
Exterior Lighting applies to school sites.
Chair/Ruzicka responded that school districts are not
governed by City statutes.
Mr. Clute recommended that the Code state that no duct
work can be mounted on residential rooftops.
Mr. Pflugrath stated the Code currently allows duct work
to be mounted on rooftops as long as it is compatible
with the building aesthetics.
Following discussion of D. 4. g. Retaining walls, the
Commission concurred that the Code should refer to the
UBC Code where applicable throughout the document.
Ron Pflugrath presented an overview of Section II of
Article III - Affordable Housing Incentives/ Density
Bonus Provisions discussion.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
C/Goldenberg asked how the City will enforce and monitor
the provisions contained in Eligibility for Bonus and
Incentives B. 1. 2. and 3.
CA/Jenkins responded that typically, a property owner is
obliged to enter into an agreement with the City which
compels them to make the percentage of units affordable
(rental or for -sale units) and an annual report to the
City that would evidence price and eligibility based on
income requirements for rental units. In the case of
for -sale units, a deed restriction would be required to
be placed against the title of the property so that it
could not be sold for more than the original price plus
a certain inflation factor so that the qualifying buyer
could not make a huge profit by selling it at a market
rate so as to insure the affordability of the unit for a
specified number of years (20 or 30 years). City staff
will monitor the development to insure that the units are
being used for their proper purposes.
C/Goldenberg asked if additional language should be
included in the code to explain the procedure.
CA/Jenkins indicated that some additional language may be
appropriate with regard to entering agreements and
periodic report provisions. He indicated he will provide
sample language to the consultants.
C/McManus suggested that the chapter include language to
the effect that this section "conforms to current State
regulations".
CA/Jenkins indicated specific language is not contained
within the State regulations. Cities may define and
enforce the regulation differently.
C/Goldenberg said that in his.opinion, A. Density bonus.
under Types of Bonuses and Incentives Allowed on Page
III -18, is a variance without findings and he has a
problem with the concept.
CA/Jenkins stated the reason the bonus is allowed without
variance findings is that in the absence of a bonus it
could be argued that the developer is being forced to
give up a right (being forced to use his property for
public purpose) which would constitute a taking of his
property. The 25 percent figure is mandated by State
law.
C/Goldenberg stated that in his opinion, Section B. 1.
could lead to "junk development" and how does the City
protect property values in the surrounding neighborhoods.
He further stated he believes that in addition to the
City Council, the Planning Commission should have input
AUGUST 51 1997 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
with respect to the approval of one or more of the
incentives (see the last paragraph under B. Other
incentives on Page III -18).
CA/Jenkins responded that there is discretion in terms of
what incentives may be required. Therefore, the
Commission can have input with respect to what incentives
would be most appropriate and what incentives would not
be appropriate. A discretionary approval would be
required by the Planning Commission.
C/Goldenberg asked that specific language be included
within the last paragraph under B. Other incentives on
Page III -18 that property values of surrounding
neighborhoods are to be protected in the event that
incentives are granted.
SP/Johnson stated that new development is subject to
Development Review. The Development Review Ordinance
requires high quality of development and compatibility
with the surrounding neighborhood.
Chair/Ruzicka reiterated the Commission's concern to have
language incorporated which specifies that property
values will not be negatively effected.
C/McManus stated he believes that no matter how cautious
a City is in administering affordable housing, it may
have some adverse effect on property values.
CA/Jenkins explained that the discussion is not about
exclusive "affordable housing". The discussion is about
developments that contain a percentage of affordable
units which are disbursed throughout the project and
which must have the same appearance in all respects to
the market rate housing.
CA/Jenkins, addressing C/Goldenberg's concerns, stated
that incentives are no longer available for developers
building exclusively affordable housing projects. This
program is completely separate and is designed to deal
with the developer who wants to provide affordable units
which are disbursed within an otherwise market -rate
housing development or is compelled to, by virtue of an
inclusionary housing program that the City has that
compels the developer to provide a percentage of
affordable units in order for the City to meet its
Housing Element goals called out in the City's General
Plan.
C/Goldenberg asked that C. 5. under Processing of Bonus
Requests on Page III -19 be defined.
AUGUST 5, 1997 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
C/Goldenberg commended the staff, consultants and his fellow
Commissioners for their attention to the Development Code document.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As presented in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, C/McManus moved, C/Goldenberg seconded, to adjourn the
meeting. Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. August 12, 1997 in the South Coast Air Quality Management
Auditorium.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
Attest:
/s/ Joe Ruzicka
Joe Ruzicka
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Pro Tem Herrera and Councilmember Ansari
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, sistant Finance Director
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, September 2, 1997
DATE: August 27, 1997
Attached is the Voucher Register dated September 2, 1997. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
its entry on the Consent Calendar.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated September 2, 1997 have been
reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are
hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO.
FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
001
General Fund
$556,071.49
112
Prop A Fund -Transit Fund
1,912.58
115
Integrated Waste Mgt Fund
4,385.00
118
Air Quality Improvement Fund
746.58
125
CDBG Fund
2,853.60
138
LLAD #38 Fund
5,854.27
139
LLAD #39 Fund
6,853.15
141
LLAD #41 Fund
3,444.00
250
CIP Fund
284,482.19
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$866,602.86
APPROVED BY:
Aida G..°Mauon
Assistant Fina ce Director
Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager
Carol Herrera
Mayor Pro Tem
Eileen R. Ansari
Councilmember
-u^TAL DUE VE, t --------? ,,55,.75
Ameri.omp
Amer:Camp
*061-4090-1200
4 80902B 01/6203
08/26 09/02 159?'D
VENDOR NAME
VENBOR ID.
2 3002B 01/6203
081:6 09/02 15959
icnerCsrtridge-HPiII 43.15
*001-4090-1200
6 80902H 01/6203
AL = i`,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PG.LI%E,,NO.
EN':'' .L:
i^i.=::E
.- F.i ": N_-
A°.r Bus Cmrany
A,&BPUSCo
Da, 'uaT,F-._,r-.Mr:=-',7'�',u.:.
AARF-55 AI�e
:+ARP
:0011-4 .5_-43.++.i
.Slf-L,
rr�jt;2
�,_
Maturehr..er:, 214
�. :. 'i'� '�,,7-
TOTAL PREPAID AMGUNT ----i
30.:.11?
TOTAL DUE VENCC'F,--------)
0.0':
ABE Corporation
ABECurp
*011,1-404)-620+';
_:9G2B C?1 G`_ 15
1
211;11 F,
1" +
r i)_
,4-
5. ?
f: p-iL r
uF :erur- r_ L'
�,
2,,».44
_'IAL ui1E 'V'E14DOR--------)
2, 44
rble Construction
A::KDr�str
*00 1-43110-22110
_ 309026 0112 5,4
), /:F
,;?/02
050;;4
Pal --tgEvca-' tage
100.00
-_'4L :;OE �';_NLGR--------
1:...00
Accurate Landscape
Accurate
IOU T-4311.-1200,
2 .i,>,)26 0'1/ 1 ,5
v:r2..
C`4/02'
4`2t-4/47_557
Ser Parr: Supp:ieS
'P9 t
*139-3539-5StX?
1 S1,902B 01/%"46
02/26
09/02
4:=825
Maint-Dist+39-Aug'77
,1'f'�,r,2
+00', -4311-1100
: 80 0 E O1, `w 7A
08/26
0102
4'�85:.
Main _rau.:irawPt:Huy' %
*001-3x13-` JO
0902B 0215897A
08/26
09/02
49852
Maint-HeritagePkAugW
71,.50
*0611-4316 5306
2 c(9r^ [-"
�1.3cB 1.,,5$97A
05/26
0./02
4.�_�c
98J,
t_ u, t. -7
Mair Maple. iiiFug-,
u'i ,,-
t_.�:�
*?1101-4319-5300
2 oc,-K3 04/5897A
08/26
09/02
49852
Maint-PetersonPk-Aug97
i,41.b0
*001-4322-5300
2 809026 05/5897A
08/16
09/02
49852
Main t -Pon -ReaganAuy=7
*001-432,5-5300
2 80902B 06/5897A
08/26
09,,02
498`2
Maint-Starsh1nePkhug97
•`_A;'7,0?0
*001-4328-5300
2 809028 07/5897A
08/26
09/02
V852
Maint-SummitridgeA,ug97
1,527.OF,
*001-4331-53W
2 80902B 08/5897A
08/26
09/02
49,3`2
Maint-SycamoreAug97
1'&&.78
TOTALDUE JEv "CR
,r: r:
Airborne Systems Inc.
AirborneSy
*001-400:'-400;'
2 809028 01/C5972
03/26
09/0:2
97-481
Aerial-P',otgropn,
:,555.7:
-u^TAL DUE VE, t --------? ,,55,.75
Ameri.omp
Amer:Camp
*061-4090-1200
4 80902B 01/6203
08/26 09/02 159?'D
TorerCartridge-HPIII 6k.4?
*001-4Cr70-i200
2 3002B 01/6203
081:6 09/02 15959
icnerCsrtridge-HPiII 43.15
*001-4090-1200
6 80902H 01/6203
03/26 09/02 16075
TonerCartridgesHKP 68.14
uTAL DUE 'JEN4'R--------1 1.77.'8
TOTAL DUE VENLDR--------) 101.25
Bat.n, Nestor
Bat1'N
.tom
_...............
.-
-E`aEUR '.AME
VENDOR ID.
*0(!1-220 %-1002
3 6019020
)S/26
ACCOUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
F'ROj.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINP.140,
Eh" f!D!E
iN4%: 6
SE _R F � SCh AMUul-N! OATIC
— ----------------------------------------=-----------------
Arago, Carf4en
AragoC
-.- ,-,.
84'3
r0�r)23
Jci2. .=,'r"2
CF' 3'44. Ev_
a._ Pefur, =,,..r
(61 rl '}l
* �. -435=-1�1,t
7^ "AL 0UE :9400R --- ) _x.00
B b K. Electric
Wholesale MElect
15
S�_C_
f -
ay_�:S{J-pplles
2 7d.E5
*001-431,1-1200
3 80?02B 0111,1.33A
08/26 09/02
122052
Voltage ester 64.83
*001-41,::-2110 1--2110
1 -:VQ 1128 02/,_..3_A
02, a 1., JM2
'12'2 )52
2
nep a_ r.t ,;.es-KeaganPk
TOTAL DUE VENLDR--------) 101.25
Bat.n, Nestor
Bat1'N
*0(!1-220 %-1002
3 6019020
)S/26
00/02
CR 384±,3
Par0eposltRefund
50.00
-.- ,-,.
Brea, City of
dreaClty
(61 rl '}l
* �. -435=-1�1,t
,21
16 8(19ti2G 01! 4759
r,c,_�:
0'?!
15
S�_C_
f -
ay_�:S{J-pplles
2 7d.E5
*001-4 50-1200
.3 X19020 J1,'C4759
0,=/26
19/02
59`38
Mi=_cRecreationSupplies
13-356,96
*.•. 1 - 4350 6<<+_2
=.�=020 fj1fC4760
._6
0'?/()'_
SUS_=-„ -
F1ald ha1re^-
__• _. L�
80901SB Olf611'
nrf b
;
.a
R ecreationEvc -wly97
t, 3-0
2 ,51
-,-. -.-
fir ����.``--------)
41,634.7•4
Business Svstems :crp
3LSSvsCorp
V)10I-4051:-1200
2 80'x:28 01/t 254
VS/26
09/02
"'1:
Cc--, ra;.er-20cases
16-1. i'=
TOTAL DUE ,EN3OR--------)
16'?.1?
DMP 'USA
CompElj3A
*001-409(1-6230
2 8Va02C 01/6211
/
0j 2
/ 6
O,? i':�
217 5
.04.
c M. - Upgrade }
C,r"r :1Gg .,e 1t5
-5 4
4_.
*001-4090-230
.J'-^- 21
:4. 'Js; 1
0,8 6
:�•/�
1 064:
jn - 1!H+�
Ed ttcrL.. ,..:ems
2r" 3n_
c c
cai:'crna C.xitract
CMA
*0")±-401±.-;3:5
1 8090
08/26
39!02
_:,er:ff6r : 2.-.L'ncl
5:.x;11 "IQ 1,)'-
x(i01-4:x31-_=25
1 8090
08116
v _
3ne�i-.rr 3i20-C"yrStirr
3".Uf ;'�; =.
*0(1-4415-2325
1 80902A
08/2'6
09
J ��
91 .Vri�';,
M
1'=.., o
TOTA, Du VENLO
JP
0.00
Cal,,for•nla ;or -,tract
CZ ---A
*c?U1-4010-233:
1 80902B
v6/26
9/0_'
SemRegstr- /1'"�-21-Ans!keF
460,00
7'' -AL UE SEND]R--------)
460.00
,ENDCR rME iENDOR IU. * Q riE 1i 4
ACUOUNT PRCJ.TX-ND BATCH PO.LINE/NC. ENIlRY1DUE INvCi'Er DE5C;iF' ;Jv AMOUINI DATE CNE:,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California joint Powers
C,1PIA
10 �t,-4 00,c„_U
fiC 2B
03,rc-b
03/v.__
12).of:
+001-4050-2:320
i
80'902B
u8/26
09,02
RskMgmntConf-Gltm-i0/1-2
LI). 00
TOTAL DUE VENEJR--------}
240.00
Canaveral, Pianeta
C'anaveralP
*0131-KMJ-1002
7
80502G
08/26
09/,32
CR =7091)
Par-,DepcsitRef,,nd
50.;-l-
Til -AL JUE VENDOR --------)
5u. 60
Carol Dennis
Car c1Jenni
*001-4040-4000
2
0,v 02C 0I1''0087
08%26+
09!0'2
DBCC971u
MinSec-C1tyCnel8/5/97
160.30
*001-4210-4000
26
,,y,+32
PC'9": i
I1: Bec-PCUMfff7, 2 29,3iU5
=4:,.:i0
*001-4:315? -4:300
4
£0902C 03/60871
08/:6
09/02
PRR9K9
"ti^aec-P R-7/24197
160.00
_.
Certified Transportation
fertTrarrsp
*Ii: 436,'-`:,ili
c
�...:8 01/"; -4
Gc,':6
r:i;i"
2'?2:1
Td, rYE = Beakor:d
:::,7
*I12 -4,:b0-:310
1'
_1,0 ';::3 01,61'i2
;,;126
Ti/02
20ia..
xiyCatr;przc-8eawerld
*11:-4360-5310
4
8,0P1.tH 01 4
1E/2t.
C'�/::
2022,
,w,,pE,_-Aecret_„
*lI:-4' 10-.i1.t
_
2B 1
'26
Y:,,'02
--U.:Z_
ua:'ll.1)pbc-Raglngwaters
4' C -__i:
14
3t =.-E :'1i`,,j'?5
C ', c
Ce-)
20:4
Dar:a.-,r=z_-BreaTat^e
C' -°
10
1:
3 -:.:b _;1..I+:
3i:E.
')"x,'02
iCA
:a4Campbc-::alGcaPter
24:.48
Char:es _cbott :+ Asc
Inc
JiariesAbb
*-X, -451';-!,502
2
-;_a,' 01/6".-J79
_ ._H.=/
0 2t.
;!�
_./C�_
_2`
04'�-' _
, _ - ' -'
Rca,: _ pure,';
-
-„
:tetault, iJJlfCle
x.447
*01'1-347':'
3
80902D
08121
0'7/02
22127
Recreationnefand
�TAL JUE vEZOR --------}
_ .7J
Chino ;-sfg &;:'_pair
ChinoMfg
0: -4090-221;.'
2
80902B 01/6153
08/26
09/02
464:4
CcugarFly-Ratric/MuLn:Fr
345.[x:
TGTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
345.00
Choi, Myvng
2450
*001-347.3
1
30902D
08/26
09/02
23008
RecreationRefund
60.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
r,0.00
"E - - - - y
ENDuR FirGlE
)ENI -OR iii.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINPN0. EINT' I/D'u�_ IN._�.CE DE'_::RT� `31_4 AMOUNT DATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Church in The Valley ChurchInTh
*Cr41-23+':--1002 6 809000
*001 1 C . -G
Cintas Corporation C,-cas
*001-4310-213++ 2 P,09:A 01':1:1
401-4310-2130 4 'I-A",;02B 01,5131
Clements, 3�ddy
*0Gi-220C-1002•
Czffee Sn:th
*J:'1-4090-2325
Clementsd
Community Disposal Co. CvmDIScuSI
40t;i-451G-5501 E"U-02.12 011603A.
LJ@m�ility
�„ .��6
*t:�Cl-45.,•_:-5.,,.0 SGS��.B 01i?5
0'3/02 CF __4»: �'a:^•Lepcsitnefund 200. C-0
Facii,t.y"entalRe+and 215.04
_'-AL DILE VE PCR --------) 415.u'
='"
Ur,;- m Rent--rkStaf
vc';26 09'72
150 11
Jn:fvrT Rent-PrkStaf
119.03
TOTAL !UE ' EK93R--------)
3c'.0t:
p_LJ_ c� rcurityiepos,t
50.00
T] AL DUE VENIGOR --------I
50.00
2i2o i';r;C
545_'
MtgSupp:,e5-Aug?7
53.85
L =!i;E 'VEK-OR--------)
:)`
f o,'-
=t-_e'_:,aeer--;_iy
7,=4".P'=
7 k DUE CEN-- --------)
7.90.28
V /+
08/20 0",�}:
' 7
L,ttemAbate-�uly3
S39.
-------
n - .44
Converse Consultants ConverseCo
zc,., pnnG ') na !•� t� .� - -, _ 'Sa a :C' 44
*255-4513,-6411 1��01 _ c,0902B 01/C5784 012/'26 3,;/02 "17:'Cn:rvvR15dr,L?ar:.r :,::..._,•_
'GTAL WE VENDOR ) 5,301.4,
:&J Eng:ieer,ng DU)Engine
*001-4220-5201 2 809028 01/5952
D. B. Chamber of Commerce DBCham,)er
*001-4096-2115 2 80902C 01/6299
08/26 09/02 97H -G'? Bldg&SftySvc-7/17-8/15 21,243.72
TOTAL CUE VENDOR --------) 21,843.72
08/16 09/02 6t6 Ad-ChmbrNwsletr-Jul/Aug 3,580.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 3,584.00
�';_N -,E I
VENDOR %'ME vSIDOR 1D.
AC&DUNT ;;,'-Q.-X-NO BATCH PO.LNE/11C. EN f D.,jW 7 %V T I-,: T DA_
- I _ - A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Da, & Nig;' Cup, CErter Day&Night
2 S09020 01/5,;KA
0:3,12"t
0910--
,J�
-laterial
�e,�Lode, -1-Prtng
-,.9+001-41.10-22110
TAL :�:E ',B.'OR --------
Delta _'d -re
4001-r1 00 4
1 80;1l21A
(,9102
kga7
Aug2er,talpremltm.s
2 75. 36 1`,/r)2-,
"J'AL PREPAID Ar1OUNT
TOTH,L DUE VEN[CR --------
C-01
jelta Caire
'.eltmCare
(14
GE:/16
09/,K
Sept'�7
Der-,a17.arePrems-907
277, 3
70TAL 26E VS'COR --------
-75,316
r-awar, _jnlrj Oy Assoc.
, ewaT,
*25,J-4510-64 II 103'='_'
4 80302C OliC5,846
0&/26
09102
DBarRehab-ConstAdiTun
12,735,00
j:11,021
DE0211
ConstSurvey-Pantera
4,:L D.00
T O,A, DUE VENDOR --------
17,}45.:}i?
�
Di3mcrd BarNalriLt -NalJmCA
I_- f-4215-2355
08/26
0,9/02
flay -,amp - June 1_97
00
7,7 ,AL DUE VENDOR --------
F;.
4481
2
06!26
09/02
221951-:
Recreat , JnRef..umd
40.:.
o3TAL CUE ;EKOR --------
150.00
*0(}i-2800.-1011
1 8090140
08/26
09/0:
g707'2r4la.254
OeotenRe4EN96-145
40.00
TOTAL TUE VENEOR ----------
00
,,A Federal Credit Union
F&ACreditU
I0G:-2110-1012
I 8M2A
08/26
09102
PP17
PP17;ayrollDed
3,295.75 0Q/02/517
TOTAL DREPALD AMOUNT ----
25
45r?. 75
TOTAL DUE VENDm -- --------
0.81}0
Feoeral Express Corp.
Feabpress
*001-4091"-212_
2 '80902C
081/26
09/0-2
423608550
Express.11Eil-1Ger.Ccvt
175.90
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
175,90
-ijj1
VENDOR NAME
yEOOF :D.
AirC±?Uk' PF"IJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/40.
EN =`f u.
Fe.'aral Reserve Bark.
FedReserie
vs/
u
FPio,ii
PP lc:l'Pa•.rcliDe�
10 .U0
Fess Parser s Lwbitree
Fess ar,er
*0()1-4030-2330
2 ?,u?02C
Lodging-7_JF'iA-Fritzal
*001-4050-23:x)
2 ROQ021C
/26
09/02
1-) 1-2
Lodging-CJPIA-Gitmed
215.60
TOTAL DLE VENDOR--------)
4:1.2:j
Firestone Stores
Firestone
*001-4310-2200
2 80"020 01/62)70
08/26
0'i/Oi
27_:62 i'?57v
'vehMtce-GKTrk
208.17
*001-4210-2200
2 � OQKC 01/11269
i., !;6
09/02
2T i;o63
tires-P1ngT%ck
190.68
TOTAL DUE VENLOR--------)
398.85
ranchi=_e Tat Board
rranch.seT
*00i-2110-1009
2 E,,)':;2E
h;�2c,
i i0'2
3�14)t_''c
Wit; hoi.tn;"r'F'I6/17
50.00
NAL J4;
'E dE,,@7R-------'t
5'1. t>
Franchise Tat 3oard
;�rarch._=T
*0ta1-211,-100Q
3 _,,;n C
V"26
0,4/02
553::7`C4
PPIF,tPi ithno',nnq
:.1-AL LUE VENKiCR--------,
.25
'JFB-Frieortch and Assoc
-FB
*01;,-2y'OCi-101:
2 ,G9;2I'
C-6 112L 6
- f0
674'-_
.�e -EJ
LLr;eI a6-164
1'+2.`!'
f001-4551-5223
4 c.O':r G 01.,;5;355
08/26
!%910'.
9708-0 1
uradtngPlanCk
:,4"7,.16
21
*O(:.-4,51-`_c
: °09926 0' 05763
0 ./
08 26
/
09•/.:_
q7r C,'- i
;L
r '-4' 23c;
DrainPlanCk-, 7- _
1i_ c ,
*1 18-4538-4,A)0
:-:
:' P.a02G 01/0`!398
08/26
i;9!02
:+708-04
Engr Svcs-Dist q.0
'34 iJi)
*1--45o�-4WU
2 8',09020 02/C5398
08/26
09/02
''37:?8•-04
E,-.gr Svcs-Dist #39
"'04.6(,
*141-4541-40()0
� 809ON 03/C53%
OE/26
09/02
'?70 -04
Engr Svcs-2iist 441
364. )0
*Z'-4510-6411 01498
14 809026 Ol/C5960
08/26
09/02
;70S7
S_rrySeal-nrea--F'yT:`i
1,42=•.'--
TCTAL DUE ,Itt+01,06'--------;
:.4_c,tb
;,TE Califor ala
GTE
*001-4331-2125
1 809020
08/26
09/02
PhoneSvc-SycamoreCyr.
54.63
T"'AL 'DLE VENu3IR -------- )54.
63
GTE California
OTE
*001-431'_-2125
1 8002C
08/26
091102
Phone5',c-Her:tagePV
54.6.;
C'AL M VENDOR--------)
54.63
rENDOR NAME 14EN" ID.-
ACi-aJNr FF',2;J.TX-NC BATCN PO.LINE!NO, EN7;*f1[j IN'•_• -E AMC, -'NT DA -E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G,C California
GTE
*;){'1-4314-2125
1 80_,QC
Pha.eSvc-HeritagePk
26.•:1
GTE California
UTE
++_1-4J.'1-.1.:.
2 Ji)-ii`IrY
(',j `LG,
09/12
C[,. _.
''TAL DUE VENDOR -/-------}
56.'.6
GTE Cal=for-.a
+E115-40.8-2125
i 80902C
08r2o
09/02
PSoneSvc-CGL
184.58
GTE Califzrnla
G E
4?'_ -2125
Fac
kip
GTE = a.. -g
GTELease
*0t. -4l?' .-.L?,?
a 3( =2C 116'38a
OS2t,
187,744
Fe;,. :7
46'�..7"
--TSL :UE - - }
44
usrc:a- ;ersr eet
UarciI'ver
5', U)
K"'2F /?=3U
US/26
09JV2
rf'.-,v
"'VIAL 1JUL ;r -Ok ________
r .'v1V
generator iervizas
�ertePat�rS
*t)+:.-4095-400+
•:�G2G 01/6167
0h/26
09;02
5b;3
Generaiur4 ti-SistrCty
47..
7'T "LI v'E'470R--------i
Gordon's Inc
Gtrdons
�0+ 120t,
2 809020
08/26
09/tit
:;:_'_ 5�;:
CC. - Lpp:ies
4.001-4350-1200
14 80M 01/6195
03/26
09102
1)8714:J/2`6
P�ieEquip-HrtgCtr
584.19
TOTAL WE 'VENDOR --------}
626.00
Gryff.ti Control Systems
GrafitiCon
*001-4558-5520
2 8t5902E 01/5M
08/26
09/02
DE07.7
GraffitiP.mvl-July97
2,910.01L
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
2,910.00
vE,+DOR : +ME ',ENDOR D.
A0=0DNT ='nvL T X -NO BATCH PO.LINEINC. EN ; IIit
___________________________________________________________________--_-__________-_-___-__-______-__
&-a-It Wcs*.err.
*GC 1-405,0-217!,
Green 7�ant
*0C,1-455:-5509
GreatWestD
]Q?ti-;:)1 /7701 081'__ 1 01:�;+)_
,;reenGiant
iVl%9G2Eai UiiC5506 8/:7 OQ1,02
AMU;-`,, D4, 7-
--------------------------
pvlpmt-=Hers;Tellvery 1,;5'i.G+. CJQri_;:'-tiV'?:':'lrbi
TO?�.L DUE 'TENSOR --------) 0.0(;
F'ri.vireelilntfrl
=TAL _'_E�E":.+OR-------->
Gurrlerl, laseph
GurrlerlJ
-347---
i 809O . -C
t;Ef2-
i)?/u
CF' :,$?_
Fey -.:er:orTr:p
LO+.i
*115-4515-5500
2' 80902Z .. 01, ,4 sb
0Ei26JL
_ _. ,)
5,)
x115-4`15-:500
4 K;03 OI/C4796
::5/2b
09/02avICB/07=7+
IulMgrn,tbres�u�Ef•ly
r 3,62. 50
,-
*001-4095-2111
. 301C2D 01/60,r4A
C,E. 26
09.102
5?r,45
5etupFGr5usCards
.n4
*001-4095-2111
4 :l''C2 _,1 f6r' 'A
26
7+)
_ _ pi U ;amAward
_ e --F t;
-',47
*0C:1-40- iii
680 .+jC', 116)9,;A
:.�('26
,)?; 12
5a7(,
Fi.rt;-F all'Q7Newsletter
;_t.10
+001-40 5-211:
- 'I'09 2L `1r '.''?A
)'a/02
21L.Pt
734
:Ad s=tep
21._`
..1-4 ,j X111
t 80902D )1 116 1C'
1,8
i .C,_
SePtEe"t+itCc7trltLtl3n
F'r:r''re_iiaNGs-Fro(rcha;
64. _
';AL SIDE VEmOLP-------)
,-4L _-LIE EN.OR --------?
`_., Si
Home Deput Ioffei�.put
riulS, J. Michael
HUISMIK.e
*115-4515-5500
2' 80902Z .. 01, ,4 sb
0Ei26JL
_ _. ,)
5,)
x115-4`15-:500
4 K;03 OI/C4796
::5/2b
09/02avICB/07=7+
IulMgrn,tbres�u�Ef•ly
r 3,62. 50
,-
.. .. CLE .I{Y15` __;
------
4, .�...
ICMA Retirement Trust -457 ICMA
1 809M
08/26
09/C2
PF1%.-1'
'c0, 0
*001-40:30-0,)8ri
1809020
08/26
)'a/02
21L.Pt
SeptCG+ tractCor.trlh
VO. 00
*OC1_40`;A-WBC+
180902C
08/26
') /.2
Sept
SePtEe"t+itCc7trltLtl3n
9,165.7'=
';AL SIDE VEmOLP-------)
'?,'9'5.75
_CMA Ret4rement-401
+001-2110-1007
2 80902C
08/26
0102
F'P16,17
PP16;177'air:IlDec
1,120.06
TOTAL UE VENCOR --------1
? 12_.:6
L.A.County P4olic Works LACPubWk
*001-4510-5507
6 MOM 01/06201
08/26
09/02
Q700l�O-,551
Traikc-GraridiRollk.noll
1,4:33.67
dE'ia Nt'--mE
EINuVtt 1-.
UP, 6
T: JL
9/ 0-5 280
Trdr„cc-,jcl JJrrgS, aRbO
'VJ.JJ
ACCOUNT Pnf-`J.T;;-NO BATCH PO.LINEiNG,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EN',
___
:I'av_'.:
970tj0 (-t,()7
Trafkc-Caplet'/Golc$prgs
Inland Empire Stage
InEmpStage
- •)1/„b2 %1
;:�/ b
'9,10'
;7.--,n00t854
TrafAcc-11BBlvdrrath
i0t_;1-441 -2'2-
*001-4510-5507
2 SOQ02D 01/6083
08/26
09/02
98010000714
TrafficSignalMtce-july97
3,564.45
TO-JAL j-UE ':E'IJOR --------
li .00
,.:and valley ;y 3.Fiieti :,'=•E
*001-130031010
1 :;0 1i1D
a-16
015,,2-_3�,
Ad- °L'37-0�:S;ADR- -u
84.3_
41MI-4040-2115
t6
'JO
yd-�r-,»:•7;Wireless
93
*0�q-4040-2115
4 :!ia01D (71/6151
08/10
09/i'2
0: C2a
Atl-ConfllctInterest
38,03
;GT,L DUE VE!,LOR--------i
101.84
int'! Business Equipment :nbusi=, ,ip
f001-4090-110(:
..�.
„.
-ug1
_;5i.51
v16
,7
35
Monts.Y9aseCng-Xerox
:6.5.00
TOTS L DUE 1/ENE _,R-------- ]
524.51
Jack's -ock & �"ey
qac a�oc;.
*001-$:.11-2200
49,P
TuTAL JUE VEN50R --------]
49.99
roily Bagel
l:idayel
*001-405,0—2-325
08/26
0=/02
Supaiie=_ /`--7ownHa1IMtg
33.60 0'?/.ice, 7 ar:-.:,:
roTAL fnEPAID AMOUNT ----}
33.60
TOT(,L DUE VENDOR--------)
0.00
JudiClaS Lata S(=_tems
-'udDataSys
+0011-4411-5405
I 01 /5.397
08/16
09/02
535';
P-E jCitaH,"a ,in-July
231.80
7-uTAL DUE vENLOR--------)
141.80
L.A. +=ounty-County:ep
LACSheriff
*+X_-441,-541"!1
1 80902D
08/02
ng!CC::rdC+ErC-Lu1y97
154,175.17
AL LLE 'VENDOR )
289,1 f 5.15
L.A.County P4olic Works LACPubWk
*001-4510-5507
6 MOM 01/06201
08/26
09/02
Q700l�O-,551
Traikc-GraridiRollk.noll
1,4:33.67
*VV1-4510-iv'v/
3V. QLD .'111,6101
UP, 6
T: JL
9/ 0-5 280
Trdr„cc-,jcl JJrrgS, aRbO
'VJ.JJ
*001-4510-5507
8 80901D 0i/C6101
08;26
09/01
970tj0 (-t,()7
Trafkc-Caplet'/Golc$prgs
11,39:1.23
*0C1-451--5:07
- •)1/„b2 %1
;:�/ b
'9,10'
;7.--,n00t854
TrafAcc-11BBlvdrrath
.L, 101.25
*001-4510-5507
2 SOQ02D 01/6083
08/26
09/02
98010000714
TrafficSignalMtce-july97
3,564.45
7-17AL L, -,UE VENDOR --------]
29,396.'33
rL"{Y�'Jr, 'Y•,!Y!E
.�NDOR t➢•
� r - -- ... � .f
ACCilUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FftGJ,TX-NC BATCH PO.LINE/NG.
EN Y/DUE
INVU E
L___Rir ._
AMO: AT DA` ,HEr,_
Lands Eno
LandsEnd
�i0;1 2�5_�2
-405 - -,'C:';/-'i';
c �0'.0..n D Q1!_,L�74
':6
`'
Ul_,,7.,7.�?
- rL
?eac-uE+3rv; ;rts-Iii
�5
i•D:AL DUE VENDOR --------)
_i2.9'S
Landscape West
LandscapeW
141-4»11-5501
i 30.O4D 01/58 94
0;1 7,„<
01647
`?aint Cist441-July='7
c,�.Q 0.0
#001-455, -=`Q3
—A
WeedAbate3v1s-JulyP7
4,6.4`-.._4
Tj,k_ DUE 'VENCER--------}
7 595.54
La._rne, City a- Lacer„er-it
4Q01 -;411-5405
2 311 ?::2C
C,8/26
�O9l02
July 9,
FarkOlt e+�r'gSvcs-July
7.00
_'7A
Leichton and Associates LCIQIton
-c_ ,.:- 112
6 1 Jam:
U_ 1
0 9 /lc
c43,
iec_eCrn2�-Eh ri 0
42t.50
X001-2300-110112
r�G D
o; [6
ri;12
437
Sai:aF,eti” EN'?5-106
_.!X1
*C-(,, 00 1"1_
4 8031,,2,
50.W
0Ftx11-_=fin:-1~:112
5 3Q�:2D:.26
09!0239
Geotecinev-EN"?t.-170
29 .,)
Ct- 4 : `412C 01;:=76,
r',:;'26
Q?102
246`_
l
_ _D
- , �6
.' 1 Ji
�4r c
70: a5„ev =N. _ 1'-
^L LJ
_atter Fertect 1SIgns _-tter:�erf
#2__-451.-b41. 10'3 8=.='Q2C 01/6250
�5U-4`1J-x.411 1:k 1': _ '9Cr22i tllib23
Lewis Engraving :-ic. LewisEngra
*(}i _' -4r,95-2111? 2 '0''O'2D (111/6187
"CJS Oc:atr,:c :on :ic. mWWm5t
08/2a 09%+.2 183,' Letter ;.n,g-EbehpE.gr.
s
;.;126 Q9,'Q2 .'149 OpenBushign-DBBIvd 64.95
TOTAL DUE YEKCn_--------}
Oe/26 .;/02 012.2 = Ecgn.y^^ acs-5isterCity 17:,20
MAL ]GE vE•,lh--------? 11'_,210
X25;;-4 1G-6415 11793 6 $090 Ol/C5771 03/26 09/02 ProgFa,2 Pet_rson ADA Retro -t 26,52.5.83
TDTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------} 2t•,526.53
Ma,r,tex Ma:rrtex
*001-4350-12CO 3 309020 01/6139 08/216 0911"72 117527111 MtceSi.pp:ies-Heritage 173.5
OiAL CUE 'VENDOR --------} 17.:.:34
LL..............
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT FRO JX -NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. Eta -`•'.:i;: iJ':ci:,E LE= r:Z .'�N AM[ id' iH`E �=
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mariposa Horticultural Mariposa
0oo-4538-2210 : 30902E 01/6148
*138-45.,8-5500 2 SV -`0:E 01i 8a2
McLonald, Will:am McL'onaldW
*001-'3223 1 809021
Mobile Modular Managesa,at `tabilmooul
*0G1-4351-214;:' 2 01/.125
Mt. Laid _:%tEC � .P1 tCzd4a�
400 211+:'-1013
Muni vff.cials-RDA Re+ora, "ORR
Nextel r+mur::at_ ns iest�i
*0+:.-4448-213:' .. 8vG::E (,1/614;
Nicolas, Micnael
fr.ce L'Eput
x001-421:0-1210
*001-421 Li''GO
*001-4050-1200
+0*,1-404,-1200
#001-4350-1200
*001-43-50-1201)
*001-4v' r1 -12t_0
NicolasM
:0903
OfficeDepo
1 80982E 11/5998
1 80902E 12/5998
2 80402E 13/5948
3 8002E 15/59n
1 80902E 14/5998
1 30'�02E It./`398
2 8)902E 17/5943
i-8126
09102
11270
Emer Repair -GAB Medians
589. G9
7--TAL P++E VENu':F--------,
1 .49
:321';
Re4 d Park Deposit
TOTH, :UE VENL-DF - }
r,;8 cn
:8%28
0'�i�)=
GEr1�1'�
Refu-+cr:Lit-Crt:+iamissai
685,01
')9/02
212o_,`_t9
FwtS-Suc lies 3red:t Memo
-+TAL JUE VEND R --------?
00
�` ''
Cc/26
0'a/0-
81.14
3gcCy^?LdgLease-Sept
3S';.7'0
09/02
21511325
Cox Dev-Supplies Cr Memo
TAL JUE dtNJOR --------
38. , 0
payrola,dLi.tic;s-PF.�117 5`. ,0
G9/02
145:v48
Two Way Radio Svcs -Jul/
i5.40
7--TAL P++E VENu':F--------,
:321';
Re4 d Park Deposit
01"
T TAL DUE VE';:.OR --------?
50.Gfj
08/2
')9/02
212o_,`_t9
FwtS-Suc lies 3red:t Memo
3.132-
(P8 /-'6
9;';)2
:lv, =s8
coal Lev--iappiies
13.:.'4
08/26
09/02
21511325
Cox Dev-Supplies Cr Memo
2:1.`-'-
:°12b
13'-1.'02
2159t-4:
�7,^3rce-Suppl.es
2:.09
0:'/26
09/:2
215'6637
Cit+Clk-Supplies-
38.59
26
'?/0:.
215961`,7
Recreation -Supplies
94.90
08/26
09/02
2159r-7315
Recreation -Supplies
124.97
718
Sen 3c t -Supplies
14.73
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40319:_
VE1_'-_1'n NAME
VENi,GR 0,
ACLIJ`.T _ %'X4CC
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
;%,T"'� PO.LINE,10.
it
- %
pV`Y____
__- - r_
N _%T
F'i:r_il-ra-s,:er
''ayrai:Tr
*C}•:.-1026
i .0?O:.A
0$,._
0'+/J2
PF.7
Payroll :'rans+_rF'F17
52,44'
v ;L-_n,,:_ AKUNT ----,
TOTAL DUE VENCCR --------)
O.00
Plt�ey �.w?s
a�ey�cwe
`
.111 11:W11-1
iFl_•,-4 ..1 J(e
2 .illy, 1E
L nir fret U1/']+101
'2
U�� r_,
:1Y -
_: /l1�
381: 1
oL� cl•�F-r{�r:,
tglJlp Rentl-August
Pivey Bowes
Pl"neyBowe
r. _4U''. itifi
_ -:�dE ",11,1--5941
.'.,r'a,
0'10'�411i1;.
'So aid. Jpua_e
—
�E VEVGOR
�_i.09-L
=wora .Jlwl_lal _.ate_=`_
-:%Iu:L-T
l-
}
.=�2C�
ihl�)c
vUiy ,r
Pt. �y,y_T.lvltr-JU1 Y�/
45�C-.V0
1'Urt�i'a _I11t1CG v'LiuGl
Par?1tv1Y5chI
140
4 311`'O:E?x;26
f.?'J-
/97!7:
Pae ,,t:-;2_Ci3ss25 Fi?(-7
1-4-7.7;
u'r+L LUE 'JEIGUR--------)
i,2r=.'6
`7rJna .aiiEy Hufna'e Soo.
"v!,s
*Gi.i-44-31-54C.
2 81"';02E 01;6075
0E/26
09/G2
42500-0,3
Ar.dalCr-trl5vcs-Sept
4,;59.17
T''TAL -1;E YENEOR
r•'oc i saver
Fool sa ver
-10C. 3Q2f,
_ 309026
OS/26
09/02
OR 8742'
•'a- Der:slf nerunC
50.00
TCTAL DUE--------
00
�ablic Empi Ret.rament
PERS
*i(C1-2110-1008
1 80902A
08/26
09/02
PP16
PF16Ret1reCGnt
3,960.35
09/02/97 000t)0.3450?
X001-2110-1008
2 80902A26
0'x;02
FP16
F'F'lartetirzCont3,760.69
� 9102/97 00000' 450'3
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----?
7,720.44
;TAI. DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
Public Empl Retirement
PERS
¢001-2110-1008
3 80902E
08/26
09/02
PP17
Retirement CGntr-PP17
*091-2110-1003
4 809021:
03/26
09/02
PP17
Retirement antr-PP17
3,773.83
TOTAL Lra 'VENDER--------i
7,153.9'2-
VEN:uE NAME VENCOR 'E.
4LZC1iNT nOJ. TX NC BATCH PO.LINE '10. :UTFY..;JE :',e, t :E=_h'1=-iJN a CJNT =ATE t_
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- —--------------------------------------------------
.H.F. inc.
;HFinc
*0C1-4411-220;
?0'':�E
,-.
!a'-�
«__
"b.=Trailar-iispiyBd-Mtce
45,:(;
'. i HL Cid VENT OR -------- }
4-`,. ;r
;'alpms arccer'j JD.
;,alNls
*o'01.1-4'350-1200
4 8(i:,,Et 01!_13,'
S, T.Gels-r.T
ny ots/Ga,L'mp
*125-41415-'200
Senior �fingo Supplies
40
71
LT :R------ -
-.moo
_ .
Repro Graphics
=prcUraph
*001-40';0-2110
"'2 80902E 01/A,161
08(2t
09/02
8522
Prty Svcs -Sus Cards
11'x.17
-7 -1 -ALL JUE VENDOR }
Roberts, Brian
,;'�iberteB
*0�:1-409'^•-4^00
4 Ct;•:2E r?1G=)54
i'_'2;
C"+.'--
F,u o:" s_ai5v[s-$/12
1'a5.CU
'nL JUE '.E'a;OR--------)
.'=x.00
Roy Allan. Slurry Zeal
.rc _.Allan
*250-4513;-6411 01418
� "`902E 01
2GNE
8i_.. ,'=F:rt1S, s -Ar ea"
' 87; 5'
-_rAL ----------
-------iSan
SanGabriel Viy Tribune
':;G ribane
2 -- --F
CIE:/2
0
AC 2,
114.4.
*001-4:10-2115
2 809'021 01 -5.983
0, 2/26
0'x,02
D:s„:ay 4d-OrlpCode 7/1
x=6.00
3 810- 2F O.,h15U
CE,126
09/0 _--
U7cx43
cuctry_.- ra4. My.a.or.um
aQ -
.--
*001-41040-2115
6 "0902F 01/6150
J�P/26
09;02
2W9
E'abinrg-Conflict/lntrst
52.x•
TO -4L .'.'UE VENDOR --------}
321,4:5
Sign Depot
SignDepot
*!1t1 40Q0-6 1C
1 80902E
06/26
384..
1,702.45
TOTAL uUE VENLOR --------}
1.70::.45
Silva, Barbara
SilvaB
*0 () I - 230 0 - 1002
4 80902G
08/26
0910.1
CR 33224
Reis:ndFari:Deposit
50. 00
TAL 'JE VEN%OP, --------}
50.00
Smrart & Final
Smart&Finl
*125-4215-12,30
S 80902E 04/6121
08/26
09/02
6756407
Ser:or Bingo Supplies
14.37
}001-41210-1200
5 80902E 01/6168
0)8/26
09/02
6763965
Prr, Supp-Soap/Dispnser
132.41
*125-4215-1200
4 809<2E 04/6121
08/:.6
676466t
Ser.ior Bingc Supplies
47.23
*001-4350-1200
6 S.0902E 0]/6121
08f16
09102
6764,607
Suppiies-recreation
1:.4).
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
207.64
VENEER 4WE vEND6f iL. � •i RE=-. � o-
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE,NO. ENTRY OUE INV'iGE LE3 =1r -T N ANLUNT DATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern _a. Edison
SoCacdison
*001-431: -2126
1 8011:112.
*001-446-_-126
1 80902F
*001-4314-2125
1 80902=
*001-4322-2126
1 3091J2F
*001-4325-2126
1 809'QF
*001-4328-2126
1 80�02F
*Wi-4331-2126
1 80902P
Southern Ca. Edison Do'aEd son
* W i - 4 0 9 1 - 21141 6 1 80902F
Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison
*141-4541-2126 1 °0 02F
Southern Ca. En son aEd.son
*138-4538-2126 1 :'v9G"F
Southern Ca. Edison Sc1;aEo.:an
j.
Sotitner* Ca. Eo.=cn SoCaEc son
*001-4510-2126 1 60902F
08/26
t!. ?126 ;1'11; J2
CQ
/2t• 1_'x/02
08/26 09/02
08/26 09/0-7
X8/26 09/02
08/26 09/02
08/26 09/02
081126 051012
08/26 09/02
Star.dard insurance of !Ore SiandardIn
*001-2110-1005 1 80903E 08/26 09/02 Sept
*001-2110-1005 280902E 08/26 09/02 Sept
The Cobb Croup CobbGroup
*001-403CJ 320 2 MOM 01/6268 08/'26 09/02
Electric
3vcs-GrQwFi
39.50
Electric
Svcs-MapiehillPk
207.14
Electric
Svcs-PeterB,nFk
3 S.'_7
Electric
Svcs -Reagan Pk
590.53
Electric
Svcs-StarshineP'k
14.52
Electric
Svcs-Sumaitridge
204.17
Electric
Svcs-SycamoreCyn
-71.85
TOTAL WE VENDOR --------)
1,5556.58
Electric
Svcs -Com Svc Ctr
273.62
l,,TAL DLDE
VEj,4-MR--------)
273.62
Ele=*r:c Svca-LLAE 441 111J.00
_7AL DUE VENDOR --------
Electric Svcs-LL.AD #346 155._3
-T4c :;UE ;E.420R--------) -
Elect -.c Sres-LLAD #al
26r.=
,IAL _UE
, ,. :,
-46
Electric Svcs-TrafficCFti
3,74'x.30
-..r r,--,
.,
Supplmntl Life Ins Prem
93.40
Life ins Prem -Sept
464.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
562.40
Subscrptn-InsdePgmkr
59.00
TOTAL ,DUE VENDOR --------)
59.00
�J�
—
—. .aa•. a..ra-
.� ..
VENDOR NAME
4ENDOR 1Z.
ACCOUNT PF'3,�.'X-NO BATCH PO.LINE/w .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E!a-
:L.
I"J. Lr
DE=LP:= ";=,„,"a
Ai"C'ti` 2A" = CFiEL
The Planning Center
PIngCenter
+i 15-409c,-4001)
2 80902E 01 /C4800
06i26
09/0,-
�- 45:. %
Prjf 54cs OMP -July
56:.00
-------
"''Tr1L 1v'E VENDOR - i
!h' "0
Time Out Personnel Svc. T meGlt
001-4 _-40iN)
c 8009022F ':1/6 _
u::/: ,
_ ,'-
24=
?empwcs-PubW1.s 8/4-8
,64.42
TOTAL CUE VENDOR --------)
;64.42
Tweed 'Financial -erv.ce TwezdFir
+0(,11-2300-1002
1 8i*,9C a
0-:,/26
09/02
CF 370 3
RefFac.l.tyDeposit
2(y'.00
--iL --UE VENDOR --------)
011).00
Universal Waste
nivWaste
117:,3
3 00%.Y
051.=,7.a
Ptr-5P4--;or_abia Kn}I
_ :.67
�(AL UE vEN;:UR--------)
2.43.67
_mail :J.L._.gn ctud:oss
J3�ir.5:'y
-4--',1.`-4251',;
_ 805.-'f
GSf t,
u9/0_
Der Codr Svcs-ii'>7
i,•�(.:'•'-"-
-,:,7
tO'r-+L 'DUE',END F - --------t
:a,1ce �C;r orat on
iC-L-rp
12 '8090J )1iC57 1
3
GEE Reconstr/Rehab-July
_ 7c.it.i5
`:7�L . E VEK2GR --------;
�istun Ser,.ce r`lan
.sion5ery
2116-1006
1 c1)`;( iA
i,r/t6
tug<7
ALg`v.slo7Frems
95_,8f. 09110211'.7
-CTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----i
956,86
TY L DUE VENE,";--------)
0.(X
vision Service Flan
VisionSery
280902E
06/26
09/u
Sept
Sep' Visicn Premiums
?`3,86
uTAL DUE vENLOR--------)
956.36
Walnut Vly +tater Dist
WvovaterDis
*1.38-45aG-2126
2 80902F
08/26
09/02
Water Usage - LLAD N38
1,40::.86
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,402.36
z ffl�- 7 z z
T4 . . . . . . . . . . ...
ACCOUNT PR1Sj,TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. EN,� _L:JE E N AMC,_NT
I -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
Wal-.Lt Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis
-*Q - -
*Qu1-444C-2,1 - 444t'. - 2, 1 1 ,.1 -- 7., _LI
'hellz -Fargo Bank
*0; 1-4010-2325
wells Fargo Bank
*001-4010-23'25
WellsFarge
3 80902F
2
Aest PUlishing Co. 4esit-,ib
*0,•1-4090-2,3'20 I&,*,;C--,F 0111157
f05ET,It2 waters YosemWater
C.
8002F 0116141
*001-4:011)-:.13t} 101 =, C9 Cr2F 0 1, 4 Q
j , 0 100902'F 0216141
*OC 1 -435' - 12,0 1
*00 1 -4:z5c, -1 20 V 12 F 02,"5:4?
I. C'NiQuY 01 140
cj 0, - 4 14 - I ":'(1 21'6140
Zee Medical Serqice Zee
*0(,I -23X-1002 5 SCI�02G
"-TAL JUE a --------
-4
Mtq w/0r-.mTsnr-Huff
'14.o3
7"TAL ',,,EENUOP - --------- )
0,8."'26
7,'-TAL DUE VENDOR --------r
34.61
t*, -?/,'-'5
7 7 3, - 2T, 5
CA Lode Updaf-Ji1Y '
74.0
7-7AL :'�E --------
74. ,4
- -12
2 6 NA
Jul,1132645
EqL:p Re-t-C`"r
0'3,02
ju I y0l'-3 L-545
EquipRent-SycC,v,,PrK
Supplies-CSCe^ter
.11-6 09 1,02
�Ii I y032645
� a t e r - 3 y c C' y P,t a -y Camp I
'
6 OP 10,2,
ju I y -1.' 5 8
Equipment Rental -Aug
08/:6 09,-62
w 1 V05,02542
Supplies-HrtgeCoviCtr
75.=-4
TOT�L SUE VENLO; --------
7
08/.-:'6 09/02
CR 37?93
ParLDeF--sitRefL:nd
5,-,. -Y-J,
TOTAL 11E VENDOR --------
50. )0
TOTAL PREPAID - --------------
70, 2'98. () I
TOTAL OLIE ---------------
7 ?6, 3(j4. 85
TOTAL REPORT ------------
106, � 602.56
SBUu, t JE -juE mAS
TOT D K C T A, EA EN 'mE',"EVE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i 'I-- Pro p �-T,-arst F
01) 1 General F,no
3 -�j6, 0 7 i . 49 Z�4, 1 -3,5. 82,
581 00 4T), 1354. 67
1z
1 LLAE C' --und
150 C.I.P. Funa
2,4,432. i9
1c)4 48, i
I _-, 5 ONG fund
1-o LLAD *38 Fundj
_5 IN
`x,154.17
141 LLAI, #41 Fund
.
5,444.;G
444.C,,-
:•,444•t":
118 Air Quality Trip
113
74t-. S'd
11 ') Int. Waste Mgmt F
4, IK.
4,
TOTAL------------
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
ALL FUNDS
2,66 , c-02) . 86 S' 4 , 1 2
1 , t'81
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 6.3
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 REPORT DATE: August 26,1997
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Assistant Finance Director
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - July 31, 1997
SUMMARY:
Submitted for the City Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of July, 1997.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
_ Ordinance(s)
_ Agreement(s)
_ Public Hearing Notification
Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office)
_ Other:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
_ Yes
_ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
_ Yes
_ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NIA
_ Yes
_ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA
_ Yes
_ No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? NIA
_ Yes
_ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
RVIEWED BY:
I
V
Ir
Terrence L. Belanger Frank M. Usher
City Manager Deputy City Manager
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
Linda G. Magnuson
Assistant Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL KEPOKT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - July 31, 1997
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City
Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the July, 1997 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for the Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of July,
1997. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank
account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from investments.
The City's Deferred Compensation balances which are managed by ICMA are also being reported.
The City receives ICMA statements on a quarterly basis. The balances reported are as of June 30,
1997.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
CITY OF UTAMONU BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
July 31, 1997
INVESTMENTS:
US TREASURY Money Market Acct. $828,253.33
TIME CERTIFICATES 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 20,000,000.00
TOTAL INVESTMENTS $20,828,253.33
TOTAL CASH
$20,884,101.23
Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. All funds are available
for withdrawal within 24 hours. Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed under the City's formally
adopted investment policy.
In May, 1997, the City's amount of investable surplus exceeded the LAIF limit of $20,000,000. As a result, the City had to
invest money in an alternative investment option. While other investments options are being evaluated, these funds have
been invested in a US Treasury sweep account through Wells Fargo Bank. These funds are "swept" on a daily basis from
the City's bank accounts and invested overnight into an investment pool of US Treasury notes. Interest will be creditied
to the City's bank account on a monthly basis.
L.A.I.F - Effective Yield for June 1997 5.667%
Money Market -Effective Yield for June 1997 4.448%
GENERAL FUND
$11,459,988.70 $1,309,232.16
$1,311,369.26
$11,457,851.60
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND
107,420.28
318.58
107,101.70
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
16,652.23
16,652.23
GAS TAX FUND
2,807,743.62
2,807,743.62
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
1,791,618.86
73,133.50
55,566.14
1,809,186.22
TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD
2,071,539.23
43,454.00
2,114,993.23
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
125,305.93
13,248.10
12,401.34
126,152.69
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
102,251.81
6,858.97
95,392.84
TRAILS & BIKEWAYS FD (SB 821)
26,156.40
26,156.40
PARK FEES FUND
562,145.58
562,145.58
S PARKS GRANT (PRP A) FD
(9,163.39)
(9,163.39)
COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD
(61,294.12)
41,302.00
10,020.45
(30,012.57)
CITIZENS OPT -PUBLIC SAFETY F
132,249.33
36.00
132,213.33
NARCOTICS ASSET SEIZURE FD
299,823.05
299,823.05
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
289,096.53
7,720.04
1,701.09
295,115.48
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
80,400.61
5,744.26
7,657.71
78,487.16
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
253,634.28
2,940.72
1,808.82
254,766.18
GRAND AV CONST FUND
139,130.78
139,130.78
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
3,445.25
8,625.11
125,633.45
(113,563.09)
SELF INSURANCE FUND
881,387.19
167,459.00
713,928.19
TOTALS
$21,079,532.15 $1,505,399.89
$1,700,830.81
$0.00
$20,884,101.23
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT
$53,864.84
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
1,308.06
CHANGE FUND
175.00
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT
500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
$55,847.90
INVESTMENTS:
US TREASURY Money Market Acct. $828,253.33
TIME CERTIFICATES 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 20,000,000.00
TOTAL INVESTMENTS $20,828,253.33
TOTAL CASH
$20,884,101.23
Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. All funds are available
for withdrawal within 24 hours. Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed under the City's formally
adopted investment policy.
In May, 1997, the City's amount of investable surplus exceeded the LAIF limit of $20,000,000. As a result, the City had to
invest money in an alternative investment option. While other investments options are being evaluated, these funds have
been invested in a US Treasury sweep account through Wells Fargo Bank. These funds are "swept" on a daily basis from
the City's bank accounts and invested overnight into an investment pool of US Treasury notes. Interest will be creditied
to the City's bank account on a monthly basis.
L.A.I.F - Effective Yield for June 1997 5.667%
Money Market -Effective Yield for June 1997 4.448%
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
July 31, 1997
(page 2)
INVESTMENT: DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNT (AS OF 08/30/97)
ICMA Retirement Corporation - 457 Plan:
AGGRESSIVE OPPORTUNITY FUND
10,587.09
INTERNATIONAL FUND
13,972.23
GROWTH STOCK FUND
92,603.00
BROAD MARKET FUND
20,348.76
EQUITY INCOME FUND
5,202.09
ASSET ALLOCATION FUND
32,970.50
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FUND
0.00
CORE BOND FUND
7,747.66
US TREASURY FUND
8,253.91
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
1,382.87
PLUS FUND
323,654.55
GUARANTEED FUND
0.00
TRADITIONAL GROWTH
11,520.16
MS CAPITAL APPRECIATION
4,987.33
MS GROWTH 8 INCOME
5,094.87
TOTAL OF DEPOSITS
538,325.02
Note: These investment options are at the discretion of the employees
Due to the complexity of the funds, which are solely handled by ICMA, the City is only reporting the balances available in
in the various instruments
The reporting period reflects the most current quarter reported by ICMA to the City.
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS
$21,422,426.25
All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy.
The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's
estimated expenditures.
n
9
Terrence L. Belanger, Treasurer
CITV OF 0IAMON1C> BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 REPORT DATE: August 25, 1997
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN
SPACE DISTRICT TRAIL ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVE GRANT
PROGRAM FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT: SYCAMORE CANYON PEDESTRIANIBIKE
ROUTE
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar is submitting an application for the 1997198 Fiscal Year Trails
Acquisition & Development Competitive Grant Program. The purpose of the grant project is
to provide a pedestrian/bike route in Sycamore Canyon from Diamond Bar Boulevard to
Golden Springs Drive. The route will traverse the scenic canyon. This proposed pedestrian
trail acts in accordance with the General Plan Resource Management Element Strategy 1.3.7,
"Pursue development of an integrated trails system within the community." The City, if
awarded the grant, will administer the grant and be reimbursed for all costs associated by the
State of California. The proposed project cost estimate is $157,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. (1997) approving the application for grant funds for the
Sycamore Canyon Pedestrian/Bike Route.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: _ Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's
office)
Ordinance(s) _ Other:
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been _ Yes X No
reviewed by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes _ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: Community Services Department
REVIEWED BY: /Q
ter,
Terren a L. Belanger Frank M. Usher Anne M. Haraksin
City Manager Deputy City Manger Administrative Assistant
Resolution No -97 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM
THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
TRAIL ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM
FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT:
SYCAMORE CANYON PEDESTRIANBIKE ROUTE
WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992, enacted Los
Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gant Prevention, Tree -Planting,
Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection (the Proposition), which, among
other uses, provides funds to public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the County for the
purpose of acquiring and developing land and rights-of-way for walking, hiking, horse, bicycle
and handicapped access trails; and
WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and
Open Space District (the District) to administer said funds; and
WHEREAS, Section 8(a)(3)(A) of the Proposition has allocated funds for acquisition and
development of land and rights-of-way for walking, hiking, horse, bicycle and handicapped
access trails; and
WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for
grant funds under the Proposition; and
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar certifies through this resolution, that the
application is approved for submission to the District; and
WHEREAS, if the City of Diamond Bar is selected for a grant award, it will be required
to enter into a Project Agreement with the District for the performance of the project as described
in the application;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR HEREBY:
1. Approves the filing of an individual application with Los Angeles County Regional
Park and Open Space District for funds allocated under Section 8.a.3.A of the Proposition for the
above named Project; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant understands that it will be required to provide additional
funding for the above-named Project if the requested grant funds are insufficient to complete said
Project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant understands its obligations to operate and maintain the
property in perpetuity; and
4. Certifies that the Applicant will return, within 30 days, both signed copies of the
project agreements sent by the District for authorizing signature.
5. Certifies that the Applicant will cause work on the project to be commenced within
180 days after receipt of a fully executed agreement.
6. Certifies that the Applicant agrees and understands that the District may terminate the
project at any point if it determines that the project cannot be performed as described in the
application.
7. Authorizes Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager, as agent of the City of Diamond Bar
to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited
to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be
necessary for the completion of the project as described in the application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
this day of 1997.
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. (1997) was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the
day of 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
Ayes: COUNCILMEMBER:
Noes: COUNCILMEMBER:
Absent: COUNCILMEMBER:
LYNDA BURGESS, CITY CLERK
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0. Q_L�_
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: September 2,1997 REPORT DATE: August 26,1997
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
TITLE: APPROVAL OF THE REVISED WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RESERVOIR
CAPACITY AND ACREAGE SUPPLY CHARGES FOR PANTERA PARK
SUMMARY: Walnut Valley Water District has both Reservoir Capacity and Acreage Supply charges for all
developable parcels of land wilt their District. Usually these charges are paid in full by the developers during
development When the housing tracts were developed in the Pantera Park area not all the reservoir capacity
and acreage supply charges were paid. The overall Tentative Tract 37075 was approved in December, 1980.
Pantera Park consists of two parcels i n separate tracts. One of the parcels (Lot 60) had the water charges
paid and water meters installed. The second and larger parcel (Lot 10) did not have the water charges paid.
The City was notified by Walnut Valley Water District that the water charges would be $50,359.95 or $2,465
per acre. In an effort to reduce the water charges the City prepared a Lot Line Adjustment The Lot Line
Adjustment modified/enlarged (Lot 60) to include all proposed improvements of the Park and Lot 10 was
reduced to incorporate the hillside and undeveloped portion of the Park. The City is required only to pay water
charges on the parcel to be developed (Lot 60). With the Lot Line Adjustment the Water District has
recalculated the water charges to be $27,065.70, which is a cost savings of $23,294.25. The water charges
are included in the Pantera Park construction budget
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve a
Purchase Order and paymeMix) the Walnut Valley Water District for Reservoir Capacity and Acreage Supply
Charges for Pantera Park in the amount of $27,065.70.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report a Public Hearing Notification
_ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk's office)
_ Ordinance(s) X Other: Lot Line Adiustment
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been
reviewed by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
3. Has environmental trnpact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
REVIEWED BY:
Terrence L. 04geer James DeStefano
City Manager Deputy City Manager
N/A Yes No
X Yes —No
X Yes _ No
_ Yes X No
Yes X No
Vivid G. Liu
Deputy Director of Public Works
CITY WUNGIL KLFUKT
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of the Revised Walnut Valley Water District Reservoir Capacity and
Acreage Supply Charges for Pantera Park
ISSUE STATEMENT
To receive water service at Pantera Park the reservoir capacity and acreage supply charges by the
Walnut Valley Water District must be paid in full.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve a Purchase Order and
payment to the Walnut Valley Water District for Reservoir Capacity and Acreage Supply Charges for
Pantera Park in the amount of $27,065.70.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The reservoir capacity and acreage supply charges of $27,065.70 is included in the budget for the
development of Pantera Park.
BACKGROUNDI DISCUSSION
The Pantera Park site includes two parcels of land (total acreage of 23.83). The Walnut Valley Water
District fees - Reservoir Capacity and Acreage Supply charges have not been paid for one of the Pantera
Park Lots. The two charges are required to be paid in full for all developed lots that will be served with
water. The Walnut Water District will not provide water service to the Park, until these fees have been
paid. The original Walnut Valley Water District invoice was for a total of $50,359.95.
Due to the Pantera Park site consisting of two parcels - Lot 60 of Tract Map 42582 and Lot 10 of Tract Map
31479 - the City prepared a Lot Line Adjustment to include the developed portion of the park as one parcel
and the undeveloped/hillside as the second parcel. Said Lot Line Adjustment was submitted for
recordation on July 25, 1997. The Lot Line Adjustment increased Lot 60 from 3.40 acres to 14.38 acres.
The original Lot 60 of 3.40 acres had the water charges paid for, therefore the City is only being charged
for 10.98 acres or a total of $27,065.70 ($2,465 per acre). The original Lot 10 was 20.43 acres and has
been modified to 9.45 acres. Concurred by the Walnut Valley Water District, the water charges are not
required for the undeveloped Lot 10..
Prepared by:
Kellee A. Fritzal
Assistant to the City Manager
RECORDING REQUESTED BY J U 251997
of D=Tier,? Reccrdco
WHEN RECORDED MAu. TO 497, — 135
CITY CLERIC ............. ��.. .... . ...,.......
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
SUnE 100, Has R•' •s
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, 0'•_ , ?t 9�
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
pry?,.. r -a. �'s ir2 ,
Loki M1=zi.c
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CASE NO. LLA -97-003
l/WE, the undersigned owner(s) of record of the following described real properties within the City of Diamond
Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereby request the City of Diamond Bar to determine if said real
property complies with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (Section 66410 et soq., Government Code of the
State of California) and the City of Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance.
(See Attached Legal Descriptions. Exhibits A" and "B )
BY: C4*y of Diamond Barf� . AS OWNER OF LOT 10. TRACT 3147_9 /
BY VLI YV Z y- NL L
BY:
Tertq= T
L. Bolaaser L Bur
gess
City Manager 7 City Clerk
DATE: �L Z i I l q7 7 DATE:
AND
BY:itv,1 of Diamond Bar AS OWNER OF
BY: . _ V W I VL( lJ �l/�f ("i -A 1/ BY:
Terre
poC L. Belanger
City Manager
-y�LOT 60, TRACT 42582
uLynda Burgess
City Clerk
DATE:] Z q ifl 7 DATE:{� / �7 S 7
DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE
THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE relates only to issues of compliance or noncompliance with the
Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances enacted pursuant thereto. The parcels described herein may be sold,
leased, or financed without hi Cher compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted
pursuant thereto. Development of the parcels may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants
of approval.
THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE is being issued for w C,;L) lots as described hereinabove and are
shown on Assessor's Map as Parcel No. 901 in Assessor's Boob 8701 at page 006 and Parcel No. 900 in
Assessor's Book X81 at page 42 , of records of the County Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, State of
California.
WE hereby state that the above described parcels comply with the applicable provisions of the S vision Map Act
and of the City of Diamond Bar Subidivision Oridinance, andmaybe leased, or fi i compliance
with all appy _ o+i/sioonssoof the Subdivision Map Act and of thte Ci
BY. ��������
BY.•
i�avtd G. Lig James DeStejano
Deputy Director ojPublic Works Deputy CityMan4r
DATE: I P7 DATE. i - 0. T7
NOTE: Sigoatu *s) of Owner(s) must be notarized, Attach Aduiowledgement form.
EXHOT "A62'
Space above this lire for Recorder's use
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LLA NO. _Y
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL " A "
That certain real property situated in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State
of California, described as follows:
Lot 10 of Tract No. 31479, as shown on a map filed in Book 998, Pages 7 to 17 inclusive
of maps, in the Office of the Registrar - Recorder of Los Angeles County and Lot 60 of Tract
No. 42582, as shown on a map filed in Book 1033, Pages 75 to 83 inclusive of above.
mentioned maps.
Excluding therefrom the following described portion of above mentioned Lot 10 of Tract
31479.
Beginning at the Northeast comer of said Lot 10, thence along the Easterly line of said Lot
10 South 09°32'25" West 1526.79 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 10; thence South
88036'18" West 90.97 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the
Southeast having a radius of 528.00 feet, a radial through said point bears North 88036'18"
East; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 52040'18" 485.39
feet; thence North 54004'00" West 89.16 feet; thence North 35056'00" East 93.03 feet;
thence North 02°36'18" West 246.81 feet; thence North 14°52'58" East 99.89 feet; thence
North 37019'04" East 179.24 feet; thence North 53033'44" East 172.00 feet; thence South
88014'19" East 147.02 feet; thence North 20015'36" East 248.09 feet; thence North
68°32'45" West 92.90 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 10, said point also
being the Southeast comer of above mentioned Lot 60; thence North 56003'25" East 206.99
feet along the Northerly line of said Lot 60 to the Point of Beginning.
As more particulary shown on the plat attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
Legal Description Prepared B.y: Qspfr
Surender Dewan, P.E. R.C.E. 34559 I L7CIS
t .
Expiration Date: 9/30/99
at =s;;
Dewan, Lundin & Associates `k
12377 Lewis Street, Suite 101
Garden Grove, CA 92840
Date: -7115117
EXMO.OT 66 �99
Space above the line for Recorder's use
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LLA NO. 97" "j
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL " B "
That certain real property situated in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State
of California, described as follows:
A portion of Lot 10 of Tract 31479, as shown on a map filed in Book 998, Pages 7 to 17
inclusive of maps in the Office of the Registrar - Recorder of Los Angels County, described
as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast comer of said Lot 10, thence along the Easterly line of said Lot
10 South 09032'25" West 1526.79 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 10; thence South
88°36'18" West 90.97 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the
Southeast having a radius of 528.00 feet, a radial through said point bears North 88°36'18"
East; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 52°40'18" 485.39
feet; thence North 54004'00" West 89.16 feet; thence North 35°56'00" East 93.03 feet;
thence North 02036'18" West 246.81 feet; thence North 14052'58" East 99.89 feet; thence
North 37019'04" East 179.24 feet; thence North 53033'44" East 172.00 feet; thence South
88°14'19" East 147.02 feet; thence North 20015'36" East 248.09 feet; thence North
68°32'45" West 92.90 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 10, said point also
being the Southeast comer of above mentioned Lot 60; thence North 56°03'25" East 206.99
feet along the Northerly line of said Lot 60 to the Point of Beginning.
As more particulary shown on the plat attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
Legal Description Prepared By:
—LU 6v"
Surender Dewan, P.E. R.C.E. 34559
Expiration Date: 9/30/99
Dewan, Lundin & Associates
12377 Lewis Street, Suite 101
Garden Grove, CA 92840
Date: 7 / 1:5/ q 7
Q %OESS/,p�;�\
f
ce ,
s.
'�l
I
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR L.L.A ?;-- --3
EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY
OF LOS AW.EU-S
DR4W PIASPOWS RW SMW
10
R- 17.00•�
L -2a78
&-074OVf
R -;ZOO
r44
CZ
AAWWW'WR)
s
7
N36'26'19'W WAIr- 1--207
4.00,
00
y 2e
140 A14
LEGEND
LOT UNE TO aE REMOVED OR
AaRJ57W
• NEW LOT LAC
E4SDAENT LOW
7
'l,' 04 -
v
k
ti
Q
FR
Ict
NW36'1rf(R) .90.97'
LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT PLAT
NOTE
TINS PUT 6 NOT A LEGAL DESCRAOMN AND SHOULD
aE USED ONLY AS AN AAD AV &AWERSTANDbW THE
ACCCAOWYM LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
m
[)M:em.
= = 3" 101
ch
omm% Lun& 7m�-�SW F. 7
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 3
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. O
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City_ Council
MEETING DATE- September 2, 1997 REPORT DATE: August 28, 1997
FROM: Terrence L Belanger, City Manager
TITLE Resolution No 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington
Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and the painting of 150 feet of red curbs at the
southwest and northeast corner of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue."
SUMMARY: In order to mitigate noise that is created by parked semi -trucks with refrigeration units on
Washington Street, the Traffic and Transportation Commission and staff recommend the parking
prohibition of commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of
Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and the painting of 150 feet of red
curbs at the southwest and northeast corners of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue. All
residents/businesses along Washington Street and the Shea Business Center have been invited to attend
tonight"s City Council meeting
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000
pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus
and the painting of 150 feet of red curbs at the southwest and northeast corner of Washington Street at
Lincoln Avenue "
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS h Staff Report
x Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification
x Other: 5/8/97 & 8/14/97 Traffic and
Transportation Minutes
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney"
2 Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote''
3 Has environmental impact been assessed'?
4 Has the report been reviewed by a Commission'?
Which Commission" Traffic and Transportation
5. Are other departments affected by the report'?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY
Terrence L Be f ng r James DcStcfano
City Manager Deputy CIT\ Manager
Y Yes —No
Majority
N/A _ Yes _ No
Yes —No
N/A _ Yes _ No
David G. Liu
Deputy Director of Public Works
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L.Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five
tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Street
from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and the painting of
150 feet of red curbs at the southwest and northeast corners of
Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue."
ISSUE STATEMENT
To restrict commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of
Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and red curb 150 feet on the
southwest and northeast corners of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from
parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and
the painting of 150 feet of red curbs at the southwest and northeast corners of Washington Street
at Lincoln Avenue "
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The proposed recommendation, which requires the installation of approximately ten (10) "No
Commercial Vehicle Parking Over Five Tons" signs and painting of a total of 300 feet of red curb,
will be funded by the Marking and Signing Maintenance account budgeted this 1997-1998 Fiscal
Year
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
On May 8, 1997, the Traffic and Transportation Commission discussed the request to prohibit
commercial vehicle parking on both sides of Washington Street between Brea Canyon Road and
Lincoln Avenue According to the State of California Vehicle Code, commercial vehicle is
defined as "a vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained
primarily for the transportation of property" Furthermore, the Code states that "passenger
vehicles which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit and
housecars (a motor vehicle originally designed, or permanently altered, and equipped for human
habitation, or to which a camper has been permanently attached) are not commercial vehicles.
At the direction of City Council, the Commission re -visited this issue to receive further comments
and input from businesses and residents during their August 14, 1997 meeting. This issue was
brought about by residents request to mitigate noise created by parked semi -trucks parking in the
area while their refrigeration units are operating from late afternoon until early the following
morning.
During both the May 8 and August 14 meeting, residents spoke in support of the recommendation
to restrict commercial vehicle parking. During the August 14 meeting, further input was recieved
and concerns regarding sight visibility at the intersection of Washington Street and Lincoln
Avenue were discussed.
Based on these discussions, the Traffic and Transportation Commission forwarded their
recommendation to install "No Commercial Vehicle Parking" over five tons (10,000 pounds) on
both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and to install
150 feet of red curb on the southwest corner and the northeast corner of Washington Street at
Lincoln Avenue.
Prepared hy:
Dawe! G. Liu Rose E. Manela
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM
PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD
TO ITS EASTERLY TERMINUS AND THE PAINTING OF 150 FEET OF RED CURBS AT
THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AT
LINCOLN AVENUE
A. RECITALS
(i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at
public meetings on May 8, 1997 and August 14 1997.
(ii) At the meeting of August 14, 1997, the Traffic and Transportation
Commission determined that the prohibition of commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000
pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly
terminus and the installation of 150 feet of red curbs on the southwest corner and the northeast
corner of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue are appropriate.
(iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends the prohibition of
commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington
Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and the installation of 150 feet of red curbs
on the southwest corner and the northeast corner of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Said action is pursuant to Section 10.08 010 of the Diamond Bar City Code, as
heretofore adopted,
The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be
best protected by the prohibition of commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from
parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly terminus and
the installation of 150 feet of red curbs on the southwest corner and the northeast corner of
Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue as herein prescribed;
3. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Commercial Vehicles Over
Five Tons" signs on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to its easterly
terminus and the 150 feet of red curbs at the southwest corner and the northeast corner of
Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue are properly posted and painted by the City; and
4. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the City
Engineer to cause said signs to be installed and said red curbs to be painted as herein defined be
established
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
MAYOR
, 1997
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1997 by the following
vote
AYES COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar
AUGUST 14, 1997
PAGE 2
T&T COMMISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:VC/yi�ka
nr, Morris,
.; istick, Chair/Leonard
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMI.B'SIONERS: Nice
II. COMMISSION--LN%&ENTS - None
III. MMLIC CONNIENTS - None
IV . - CONSENT CALENDAR - None
r
V. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Parking Restrictions on Washington Street Between
Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lane.
DDPW/Liu presented staff's report. Staff recommends
that the Traffic and Transportation Commission
receive further comments and input from residents
and property owners and discuss various alternatives
to the parking restriction to forward to the City
Council.
Lyle Kennedy, Industry Machinery Sales, Washington
Street, stated he is not opposed to a parking ban on
Washington Street. However, he proposes something
less than a ban such as "No Overnight Parking" or no
engines running on parked vehicles for the
residential portion of the street.
Dr. Lawrence Rhodes, 21224 Fibre Court, said he
represents approximately 15 people who live in the
area who are concerned about site safety when
exiting from Lincoln Avenue North onto Washington
Street because trucks are parked too close to the
intersection. He and the people he represents are
asking for 150 feet of red curbing on both sides of
Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue. He indicated
he concurs that refrigeration units should not be
allowed to run all night. Several residents of the
trailer park on Washington Street drive trucks or
tractor trailers and cannot park their vehicles
inside the trailer park.
Sgt. Rawlings cited Diamond Bar Ordinance No. 4
which addresses parking of commercial vehicles on
city's streets. He suggested the Ordinance be
posted on Washington Street to alert commercial
AUGUST 14, 1997 PAGE 3 TAT
vehicle operators regarding the law.
Dr. Rhodes said that the cabover portion may not
meet the restrictive commercial weight standard and
that is the reason the residents are asking for the
red curbing.
Following discussion, C/Istik moved, VC/Virginkar
seconded, to recommend to the City Council the
installation of "No Commercial Vehicle Parking" over
five ton (10,000 pounds) on both sides of Washington
Street from Brea Canyon Road easterly to its
terminus, and install 150 feet of red curbing on the
southwest corner and the northeast corner of
Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue. The motion was
approved 4-0 with the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Istik, VC/Virginkar,
Morris, Chair/Leonard
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nice
I. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Intersection Markings on Carpio Drive and itos
Place.
AE/Manela presented staff's report,/ Staff
recommends that the Traffic andansportation
Commission concur with staff' recommendation to
install 100 feet length int section markings of
three legs of the interse9tion of Carpio Drive and
Armitos Place. y`
y'
Debby O'Connor ask%Y what kind of striping is
11
proposed to be installed.
r
,r
DDPW/Liu resp ded that a solid double yellow line
striping is,roposed.
C/Morri,,moved, C/Istik seconded, to concur with
staff' recommendation to install 100 foot length
inte ection markings on three legs of the
in rsection of Carpio Drive and Armitos Place. The
m tion was approved 4-0 with the following Roll Call
ote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Morris, Istik,
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 7, 1997 MEETING DATE: August 14, 1997
TO: Chairman and Members of the Traffic and
Transportation Commission
FROM: David G. Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works
Rose E. Manela, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Parking Restrictions on Washington Street between Brea Canyon Road to South Alder
Lane
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Traffic and Transportation Commission has previously discussed this item during the May 8, 1997
meeting and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to prohibit parking of commercial
vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) on Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder
Lane. During the regular meeting of the City Council on July 15, 1997, Council directed staff to obtain
additional input/comments and to explore the various alternatives regarding the parking issue on
Washington Street.
The original request was based on the need to mitigate noise that is created by parked semi -trucks
with refrigeration units on Washington Street Line of sight concerns was also brought to
attention.
Possible alternatives are,
A. Prohibit parkin; of commercial vehicles over five tons on both north and south sides of
Washington Street.
B Prohibit parking of commercial vehicles over five tons on the south side of Washington street
and on the north side, starting at frontage of the trailer homes.
C Consider red curbing adjacent to the drive approaches of properties.
RECOi\1MENDATION:
It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission receive further comments and input
from residents and property owners and discuss various alternatives to the parking restriction to
forward to the City Council.
7
i JU70F
PAGE 7
RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD TO SOUTH
ALDER LANE.
Dr. Lawrence Rhodes expressed concern about the trucks obstructing views
of vehicles entering Brea Canyon Rd. from Lincoln Ave. He was not
concerned about vehicle weight or refrigeration noise. Mr. Kennedy's
vehicles do not present problems to the neighborhood residents.
Lyle Kennedy said he is also concerned about line -of -site problems as well
as air pollution caused by big rigs left running on Lincoln Ave. for two and
three days at a time.
Eric Flodine, 21239 Cottonwood Ln., said refrigeration unit noise is a
problem for him and his neighbors and expressed concern about aesthetics.
He stated there were 8 trucks parked on Lincoln Ave. this evening.
Mr. Kennedy suggested the City adopt an ordinance prohibiting trucks from
running their engines while parked on City streets.
C/Wemer moved, C/Ansari seconded, to return this item back to the Traffic
& Transportation Commission to provide more public notice, request that the
Commission consider additional input received by Council and offer other
mitigation options. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Werner, MPT/Herrera, M/Huff
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony
9.2 RANCH FESTIVAL REQUEST FOR USE OF PETERSON PARK - Steve
Johnson, Ranch Festival President, spoke in support of the request for use
of Peterson Park.
Don Schad explained why he is opposed to permitting the Ranch Festival
to take place at Peterson Paris.
Steven Tye said if he had been present at the last Traffic & Transportation
Commission meeting, he would have voted against allowing the Ranch
Festival at Peterson Park. He agreed that the Festival had been good for
the community; however, Peterson Park is the wrong facility for this event.
Gary Neely pointed out the benefits of the Ranch Festival to the community.
He asked that Council consider giving $5,000 to the Festival for preparation
of the Corporate Center location.
a Al %I" 1
Traffic S Transportation Commiission`\
Minutes of May 8, 1997.
Cif! ;ic,t Lon was approved with the following Roll Call vote:
k'l,S COMMISSIONERS: Istik, Nice, Morris,
VC/virginkar,
Chair/Leonard
I tc �F S: COMMISSIONERS: None
1.5 EY7 : COMMISSIONERS: None
VI. r3x EDB: Nli B:
A. ! Evoluation of washington Street last of Brea Canyon
�_,/ Road.
kkj kbe^ra presented the staff report. Staff recommends
t:,iat tie Traffic and Transportation Commission concur
r.th staff to install "No Commercial Vehicle Parking"
,.gns in Washington street as deemed appropriate by
al-.aff ind forward said recommendation to the City
cou -1ci ..
johi Rapiajan said there are no parking problems in his
liE'.ilhborhood. He wanted to know who is objecting to
the parking and why.
char/Leonard responded that as a result of citizen
input, the matter has come before the Commission for
discussion.
EPW,Wentz explained that a citizen raised a concern
about semi tractor -trailer trucks parking in the area
and leaving their vehicles running for extended periods
of time which caused a significant amount of noise to
the adjacent residential area. He reiterated that
staff is recommending restriction of commercial vehicle
parking only and not residential.
Mr. Rapiajan responded to C/Intik that it does not
bother him that trucks park on his street but he would
not like for it to be a regular occurrence.
Raymond -Van Dorn said that although residents need
street parking, the semi -trucks parked on the street
with motors running all night concern him. He
indicated he is also concerned with sight safety
because of the parked trucks. He recommended that the
Commission place a weight limit restriction on the
parking so that it does not penalize the residents and
prevent them from parking their cars, pickups and
campers. He said the person who filed the complaint
with the City is concerned about the refrigerator
trucks parking in front of his home and leaving their
units run all night which generates a significant
amount of noise and inteferes with the quality of life
in the area.
I . , in-3JC-=-_ _ -)n =_55 __,r1
WLIIlltes it !Ia7 3, 197.
:ric FLod.ne said he passes Washington Street at least
:hr(tE :im(s a day. He can verify that trucks park on
:he steel and leave their motors or refrigeration
u6nits -unr ing all night. He indicated he feels the
41ia.in, Ltic n of semi -truck parking needs to extend the
lull length of Washington Street. In addition to the
:emi-t;-uchs, there are usually three rental trucks
Farked on Washington Street which is very aesthetically
cispleisir,3. He agrees that there is a need for
zesidertiaL street parking. He suggested that the
Commis ion restrict commercial parking for the full
lengt1A of aashington Street.
rai4; tlut, stated the City has granted relief to
rasidents :n other parts of the City. He favors
j : an,:in 3 t. its request for Washington Street area
:Bsidents. He is concerned with the placing signs that
at]-ict ",.ommercial" vehicles. He said he agreed that
.�lisines3 vehicles such as rental trucks should be
p:-ohl.bi:ed from street parking. He indicated he favors
r(!stri.c :ince vehicles of 3 ton gross weight and over.
I)I,W/wen,:z :n response to C/Nice, explained that
restricting vehicles 3 ton and over would include
larger utility vehicles and recreational vehicles.
Therefore, staff is recommending that commercial
vehicles be restricted from parking on the street.
Fcllowirg discussion, C/Morris moved, C/Istik seconded,
to approve staff's recommendation to install "No
Commercial Vehicle Parking" signs the entire length of
Washington Street to Alder Street as deemed appropriate
by staff and forward said recommendation to the City
Council. The restriction applies to the rental agency
trucks. The motion was approved with the following
Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Morris, Istik, Nice,
VC/Virginkar,
Chair/Leonard
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
DPW/Wentz indicated this item will appear on the June
3, 1997 City Council agenda for further consideration.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII.ITEMS FROM CONXISSIONERSs
DPW/Wentz confirmed that the City's Code Enforcement
Department deals with disabled vehicles on private and
public property.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 7, 1997 MEETING DATE: August 14, 1997
TO: Chairman and Members of the Traffic and
Transportation Commission
FROM: David G. Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works
Rose E. Manela, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Parking Restrictions on Washington Street between Brea Canyon Road to South Alder
Lane
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Traffic and Transportation Commission has previously discussed this item during the May 8, 1997
meeting and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to prohibit parking of commercial
vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) on Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder
Lane. During the regular meeting of the City Council on July 15, 1997, Council directed staff to obtain
additional input/comments and to explore the various alternatives regarding the parking issue on
Washington Street.
The original request was based on the need to mitigate noise that is created by parked semi -trucks
with refrigeration units on Washington Street. Line of sight concerns was also brought to
attention.
Possible alternatives are:
A. Prohibit parking of commercial vehicles over five tons on both north and south sides of
Washington Street.
B. Prohibit parking of commercial vehicles over five tons on the south side of Washington street
and on the north side, starting at frontage of the trailer homes.
C Consider red curbing adjacent to the drive approaches of properties.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission receive further comments and input
from residents and property owners and discuss various alternatives to the parking restriction to
forward to the City Council.
>YI
/ JU7OF
PAGE 7
RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD TO SOUTH
ALDER LANE.
Dr. Lawrence Rhodes expressed concern about the trucks obstructing views
of vehicles entering Brea Canyon Rd. from Lincoln Ave. He was not
concerned about vehicle weight or refrigeration noise. Mr. Kennedy's
vehicles do not present problems to the neighborhood residents.
Lyle Kennedy said he is also concerned about line -of -site problems as well
as air pollution caused by big rigs left running on Lincoln Ave. for two and
three days at a time.
Eric Flodine, 21239 Cottonwood Ln., said refrigeration unit noise is a
problem for him and his neighbors and expressed concern about aesthetics.
He stated there were 8 trucks parked on Lincoln Ave. this evening.
Mr. Kennedy suggested the City adopt an ordinance prohibiting trucks from
running their engines while parked on City streets.
C/Wemer moved, C/Assad seconded, to return this item back to the Traffic
& Transportation Commission to provide more public notice, request that the
Commission consider additional input received by Council and offer other
mitigation options. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Werner, MPT/Herrera, M/Huff
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony
9.2 RANCH FESTIVAL REQUEST FOR USE OF PETERSON PARK - Steve
Johnson, Ranch Festival President, spoke in support of the request for use
of Peterson Park.
Don Schad explained why he is opposed to permitting the Ranch Festival
to take place at Peterson Park.
Steven Tye said if he had been present at the last Traffic & Transportation
Commission meeting, he would have voted against allowing the Ranch
Festival at Peterson Park. He agreed that the Festival had been good for
the community; however, Peterson Park is the wrong facility for this event.
Gary Neely pointed out the benefits of the Ranch Festival to the community.
He asked that Council consider giving $5,000 to the Festival for preparation
of the Corporate Center location.
l.jlI"t'`li- i
`iiautes of May 3, 1997.
:r i<; F Lod .ne said he passes Washington Street at least
:hrmi :im,!s a day. He can verify that trucks park on
:he :;t -ee- : and leave their motors or refrigeration
snit::: =uni ling all night. He indicated he feels the
:lira_ n iti( ,n of semi -truck parking needs to extend the
.ul:. 1 angl h of Washington Street. In addition to the
cemi.- t -ucl s, there are usually three rental trucks
earl*d on Washington Street which is very aesthetically
lisp) a tsii g. He agrees that there is a need for
•esj c.e itii 1 street parking. He suggested that the
('o=.is cion restrict commercial parking for the full
encth of Washington Street.
c raig i :lute stated the City has granted relief to
residents in other parts of the City. He favors
c rantij ig this request for Washington Street area
iesidei;ts. He is concerned with the placing signs that
restrict "commercial" vehicles. He said he agreed that
kusine:,s Vehicles such as rental trucks should be
rrohibated from street parking. He indicated he favors
restricting vehicles of 3 ton gross weight and over.
LPW/Wertz in response to C/Nice, explained that
restricting vehicles 3 ton and over would include
larger utility vehicles and recreational vehicles.
Iherefcre, staff is recommending that commercial
vehicles be restricted from parking on the street.
Following discussion, C/Morris moved, C/Istik seconded,
to approve staff's recommendation to install "No
Commercial Vehicle Parking" signs the entire length of
Washington Street to Alder Street as deemed appropriate
by staff and forward said recommendation to the City
Council. The restriction applies to the rental agency
trucks. The motion was approved with the following
Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Morris, Istik, Nice,
VC/Virginkar,
Chair/Leonard
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
DPW/Wentz indicated this item will appear on the June
3, 1997 City Council agenda for further consideration.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITM(S - None
VIII.ITEMB FROX COX>MIISSIONERS:
DPW/Wentz confirmed that the City's Code Enforcement
Department deals with disabled vehicles on private and
public property.
Traffic S Transportation Commissio,
Minutes of May 8, 1997.
rie ru�tLon was approved with the following Roll Call vote:
k'Es: COMMISSIONERS: Istik, Nice, Morris,
VC/Virginkar,
Chair/Leonard
WE 3:
COMMISSIONERS: None
J S rlr7 : COMMISSIONERS: None
VI. law, Bus: NEE B:
2. ) Evaluation of Washington street East of Brea canyon
Rot d.
ki A.be:-ra presented the staff report. Staff recommends
:zzt tie Traffic and Transportation Commission concur
with staff to install "No Commercial Vehicle Parking"
:.Lcns in Washington street as deemed appropriate by
:;-:aff ind forward said recommendation to the City
Cou Fici ..
,'oh't Rnpiajan said there are no parking problems in his
tteilhborhood. He wanted to know who is objecting to
the parking and why.
C'ha'r/Leonard responded that as a result of citizen
inp-it, the matter has come before the Commission for
dis�:ussion.
DPW,Wentz explained that a citizen raised a concern
about semi tractor -trailer trucks parking in the area
and leaving their vehicles running for extended periods
of time which caused a significant amount of noise to
the adjacent residential area. He reiterated that
staff is recommending restriction of commercial vehicle
parking only and not residential.
Mr. Rapiajan responded to C/Istik that it does not
bother him that trucks park on his street but he would
not like for it to be a regular occurrence.
Raymond -Van Dorn said that although residents need
street parking, the semi -trucks parked on the street
with motors running all night concern him. He
indicated he is also concerned with sight safety
because of the parked trucks. He recommended that the
Commission place a weight limit restriction on the
parking so that it does not penalize the residents and
prevent them from parking their cars, pickups and
campers. He said the person who filed the complaint
with the City is concerned about the refrigerator
trucks parking in front of his home and leaving their
units run all night which generates a significant
amount of noise and inteferes with the quality of life
in the area.
fr ;l'w ?L Aq
Qv
CITY QF v10%mcs9Vv WO%F%
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NOSZ
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 REPORT DATE: August 28,1997
FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director
TITLE: Second reading of Ordinance No. 06 (1997) of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending
Division 2 of Chapter 12.00 of Title 12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Relating to Park Rules and
Regulations
SUMMARY: At its meeting on August 19, 1997, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 06 (1997) to
prohibit golf in the City's public parks, except for areas designated for this purpose. This is the second reading
of the ordinance. The ordinance will be effective in 30 days.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council approve for second reading, by title only,
waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 06 (1997) amending Division 2 of Chapter 12.00 of Title 12 of the
Diamond Bar Municipal Code relating to Park Rules and Regulations to prohibit golf in the City's public parks.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report
Resolution(s)
Ordinance(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's office)
_ Other.
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been
reviewed by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
What Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
�i�a�naer
;- TZ7
erre cif e L. James DeStefano
City Manager Deputy City Manager
X
Yes _
No
X
Yes _
No
_
Yes X
No
X
Yes _
No
Parks & Recreation
_
Yes
No
None
Bob s
Community Services Director
ORDINANCE NO. 06 (1997)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING DIVISION 2 OF
CHAPTER 12.00 OF TITLE 12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS.
The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Does Ordain As Follows:
Section I
Section 12.00.410 is hereby added to Division 2 of Chapter 12.00 of Title 12 of the
Diamond Bar Municipal Code to read:
"Sec. 12.00.410 Golf.
A person shall not play or practice golf (including, but not limited to, driving, chipping
or putting a standard or simulated golf ball), except in a golf course, driving range
and/or areas permitted by the director, and subject to all rules and regulations posted
at such areas.
Passed, Approved and Adopted this day of 11997.
Mayor
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar held on the day of , 1997 and was finally passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of
, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members -
NOES: Council Members -
ABSENT: Council Members -
ABSTAINED: Council Members -
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF COUNCIL CITY MANAGER EVALUATION COMMITTEE
FROM: MAYOR HUFF AND MAYOR PRO TEM HERRERA
RE: CITY MANAGER COMPENSATION AND CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1997
The City Council has not modified the City Manager's agreement since September, 1995. With
the completion of the City Manager's evaluation, by the Council, it is appropriate to discuss and
recommend improvements in the City Manager's salary and compensation.
DISCUSSION: The City Manager has not had an adjustment in salary and benefits, except for
monetary changes in the cafeteria benefit amount, since September 1995. In consideration of the
time since the previous modification of the City Manager's agreement and the City Manager's
recent evaluation, several modifications to the agreement, salary range, and benefits are proposed.
1. Salary and Benefits:
Instead of a salary, (which includes payroll -based benefits, PERS, workers compensation,
and medicare), an amount approximately equivalent to a six percent (6%) increase in
salary and basic benefits is proposed to be contributed instead to Ca1PERS, on behalf of
the City Manager to "buy back" military service time (8/1/63 to 5/31/67). The bi-weekly
contributions would be $263.86. The annual cost would be $6,860.36 for the military
service buyback. The total cost of a six percent (6%) would be $6,834.80 (salary =
$5,800; Ca1PERS=$790; workers compensation=$160; medicare=$85).
Although a salary change is not proposed, the establishment of a salary range for the City
Manager is proposed. The salary range provides a mechanism for maintaining an
appropriate salary differential between the City Manager's salary range and the salary
ranges of City Manager subordinates. The proposed range is $83,508.91 to $111,909.92.
2. Definition of Involuntary Termination for Cause:
The City Manager has requested that the definition of Involuntary Termination for cause
be defined pursuant to the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority's (CJPIA) Special
Liability Protection Section 15 (attached hereto). The language found in the recommen-
dation hereinafter set forth is the CJPIA's involuntary termination for cause language,
which is found in Section 15 of the Special Liability Protection Program.
City Manager Compensation and Contract Modifications Memorandum
Spetember 2, 1997
Page Two
3. Comprehensive Administrative Leave:
The City Manager currently receives annual accruals of a variety of paid leaves:
vacation=160 hrs; sick=30 hrs; administrative=80hrs; and floating=l6hrs. Vacation and
sick leaves can be accumulated up to a maximum amount (240 hrs and 160 hrs,
respectively). Administrative leave and floating holidays are not now accumulated.
Vacation and sick leaves are payable to the Manager, upon leaving the City's service.
Administrative leave and floating holidays are not payable upon separation from City
service.
The proposal here is to create Comprehensive Administrative Leave as the method for
accruing, accumulating and paying at separation, such leave. The proposal would provide
three hundred sixty (360) hours of Comprehensive Administrative Leave (CAL) to the
City Manager annually, accrued bi-weekly. CAL would not have a maximum accumulated
limit. CAL would be payable, at the time of separation from service. Forty (40) hours of
CAL must be utilized each fiscal year, in that forty (40) hours of CAL would not be
carried over annually (320 hours may be accumulated and carried once annually).
With this in mind, the following modifications to the City Manager employment agreement are
recommended:
1. CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS:
Section 3, TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY:
A. The City Council may terminate the employment of the Manager at any time, provided
however, that if and when such employment is involuntarily terminated without cause,
City shall pay Manager a lump sum cash payment equal to the monetary value of six (6)
months salary and benefits, which are set forth in Exhibit "A ".
B. Involuntary termination for cause means ending the employment of Manager because
Manager has been convicted of robbery, bribery, extortion, embezzlement, fraud, grand
larceny, burglary, arson, a felony violation of a state or federal law regulating a
controlled substance (felony drug conviction), murder, rape, kidnapping, perjury, assault
with intent to kill, or any felony involving abuse or misuse of the City Manager's position
to obtain an illegal personal gain.
C. In the event the Manager desires to resign his position with City, then Manager shall
give City sixty (60) days written notice thereof in advance.
City Manager Compensation and Contract Modifications Memorandum
Spetember 2, 1997
Page Three
Section 7, OTHER BENEFITS:
A. Manager shall be entitled to observe holidays on the same basis as management
employees. Cafeteria benefits, Ca1PERS contributions and other similar benefits provided
to other management employees shall be provided to the Manager on the same basis.
B. Effective July 1, 1997, Manager shall be entitled to Comprehensive Annual Leave
(CAL); in lieu of, vacation, sick, administrative, and floating holiday leave(s). Manager
shall be entitled to three hundred sixty (360) hours per fiscal year in Comprehensive
Annual Leave. With the exception of forty (40) hours per fiscal year, any and all
Comprehensive Annual Leave maybe carried over from one fiscal year to another. All
accrued and accumulated Comprehensive Annual Leave is payable upon termination of
employment.
C. Manager shall be permitted to attend, at City expense, professional conferences,
seminars, workshops, meetings and other similar activities, approved and allocated, by the
City Council through the budget or other appropriate process(es).
Section 8, RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS:
A. City and Manager recognize that City has completed the legally required procedure to
contract with the Public Employees Retirement System. To the extent the same is legally
permissible, City agrees to endeavor to enroll Manager therein. City agrees to pay
Manager's share of the PERS contribution in addition to the City's share thereof.
B. The City shall also contribute, on behalf of the City Manager, $263.86 in bi-weekly
payments to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (Ca1PERS), to add four
years of service credit to the City Manager's retirement account for City Manager's
military service (8/01/63 to 5/17/67).
2. AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-53C:
A. Salary range, Schedule A, be modified to include a salary range for the position of City
Manager.
CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
SPECIAL LIABILITY PROTECTION
SECTION 15. TERMINATION OF CITY MANAGER'S EMPLOYMENT LIABILITY
PROTECTION
15.1 Protection Clause
Subject to all provisions of this Memorandum, the Authority shall cause
this Program to pay on behalf of the Protected Party the Unemployment
Protection Payment, in exchange for a Waiver and Certification, in the
event of Involuntary Termination of a City Manager's Employment, caused
by an Occurrence during the Protection Period of this Memorandum
specified on the Cover Page.
15.2 Definitions Applicable to this Section 15
Involuntary Termination of a City Manager's Employment means injury
arising out of the following:
a. Dismissal, discharge or termination of the employment of a
City Manager.
b. Failure to renew an employment contract which results in
termination of the employment of a City Manager;
Involuntary Termination of a City Manager's Employment injury
does not occur if the dismissal, discharge, termination of
employment or failure to renew a contract is for cause, for the
reasons stated in 29 USC, Section 1111, of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Termination for cause
means ending the employment of a City Manager because the City
Manager has been convicted of robbery, bribery, extortion,
embezzlement, fraud, grand larceny, burglary, arson, a felony
violation of a state or federal law regulating a controlled substance
(felony drug conviction), murder, rape, kidnapping, perjury, assault
with intent to kill, or any felony involving abuse or misuse of the
City Manager's position to obtain an illegal personal gain.
Benefits means perquisites, fringe benefits, payments in connection with an
employee benefits plan, other than the Medical Benefit, or any other
payment, other than salary or wages, to or for the benefit of a City
Manager.
Certification means a signed statement by a City Manager that he is entitled
to the Unemployment Protection Payment because he is unemployed or is
employed but at a specified, lower salary than he was earning at the time of
the Occurrence.
City Manager means the governing body -appointed chief administrative
officer of a Protected Party whether called City Manager, Chief
Administrative Officer or other title designating the highest appointed
official of the governmental entity.
Medical Benefit means the cost of all benefits to which the City Manager is
entitled under the Comprehensive Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1986 (COBRA).
Occurrence means the ending of a City Manager's employment by a
Protected Party which results in Involuntary Termination of a City
Manager's Employment.
Unemployment Protection Payment means a payment which shall be paid
once a month, for a time period not to exceed six months (the "Payment
Period") following the Waiting Period that shall equal the amount of the
City Manager's salary at the time of the Occurrence plus payment of the
Medical benefit less any amount of compensation earned, while self-
employed or an employee, or any other payment received as a result of the
Occurrence during the Payment Period.
"Salary," for purposes of this Unemployment Protection Payment,
means the regular monthly compensation of the City Manager,
whether paid monthly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly or otherwise, and
does not include Benefits, bonuses, car allowances, expense or
other allowances, contributions to the Public Employees Retirement
System or any deferred compensation payments made on behalf of
the City Manager by the Protected Party.
Waiting Period means a period of time after the Occurrence equal to the
greater of (1) six months or (2) the number of months of salary received by
the City Manager as a severance payment from the Member.
Waiver means a full and complete relinquishment by a City Manager of any
and all rights to sue a Protected Party for any Benefit, compensation, injury
or damages, known or unknown, past, present or future, arising out of the
employment of, termination of the employment or, or failure to employ the
City Manager.
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1997-98
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Receptionist
834
8.34
8.75
9.19
9.65
10.13
10.64
11.17
1,444.98
1,517.23
1,593.09
1,672.74
1,756.38
1,844.20
1,936.41
17,339.74
18,206.73
19,117.06
20,072.92
21,076.56
22,130.39
23,236.91
Jr. Clerk Typist
967
9.67
10.15
10.66
11.19
11.75
12.34
12.96
1,675.94
1,759.73
1,847.72
1,940.11
2,037.11
2,138.97
2,245.92
20,111.25
21,116.81
22,172.65
23,281.29
24,445.35
25,667.62
26,951.00
Community Services
967
9.67
10.15
10.66
11.19
11.75
12.34
12.96
Coordinator
1,675.94
1,759.73
1,847.72
1,940.11
2,037.11
2,138.97
2,245.92
20,111.25
21,116.81
22,172.65
23,281.29
24,445.35
25,667.62
26,951.00
Clerk Typist
1037
10.37
10.89
11.44
12.01
12.61
13.24
13.90
1,798.21
1,888.12
1,982.52
2,081.65
2,185.73
2,295.02
2,409.77
21,578.48
22,657.40
23,790.27
24,979.78
26,228.77
27,540.21
28,917.22
Account Clerk 1
1037
10.37
10.89
11.44
12.01
12.61
13.24
13.90
1,798.21
1,888.12
1,982.52
2,081.65
2,185.73
2,295.02
2,409.77
21,578.48
22,657.40
23,790.27
24,979.78
26,228.77
27,540.21
28,917.22
Adminstrative
1136
11.36
11.93
12.53
13.15
13.81
14.50
15.23
Analyst
1,969.51
2,067.99
2,171.39
2,279.96
2,393.96
2,513.65
2,639.34
23,634.16
24,815.87
26,056.66
27,359.49
28,727.47
30,163.84
31,672.03
Secretary
1141
11.41
11.98
12.58
13.20
13.87
14.56
15.29
1,977.19
2,076.05
2,179.85
2,288.85
2,403.29
2,523.45
2,649.62
23,726.29
24,912.60
26,158.23
27,466.14
28,839.45
30,281.42
31,795.49
Account Clerk 11
1141
11.41
11.98
12.58
13.20
13.87
14.56
15.29
1,977.19
2,076.05
2,179.85
2,288.85
2,403.29
2,523.45
2,649.62
23,726.29
24,912.60
26,158.23
27,466.14
28,839.45
30,281.42
31,795.49
Code Enforcement
1193
11.93
12.53
13.15
13.81
14.50
15.23
15.99
Officer
2,068.11
2,171.52
2,280.09
2,394.10
2,513.80
2,639.49
2,771.47
24,817.34
26,058.20
27,361.11
28,729.17
30,165.63
31,673.91
33,257.60
Parks Maintenance
1203
12.03
12.63
13.26
13.93
14.62
15.35
16.12
Worker H
2,085.34
2,189.61
2,299.09
2,414.04
2,534.75
2,661.48
2,794.56
25,024.10
26,275.31
27,589.08
28,968.53
30,416.96
31,937.80
33,534.69
Deputy City Clerk
1257
12.57
13.20
13.86
14.55
15.28
16.04
16.85
2,179.08
2,288.03
2,402.44
2,522.56
2,648.69
2,781.12
2,920.18
26,148.96
27,456.41
28,829.23
30,270.69
31,784.23
33,373.44
35,042.11
Administrative
1257
12.57
13.20
13.86
14.55
15.28
16.04
16.85
Secretary
2,179.08
2,288.03
2,402.44
2,522.56
2,648.69
2,781.12
2,920.18
26,148.96
27,456.41
28,829.23
30,270.69
31,784.23
33,373.44
35,042.11
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1997-98
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Administrative
1257
12.57
13.20
13.86
14.55
15.28
16.04
16.85
Assistant
2,179.08
2,288.03
2,402.44
2,522.56
2,648.69
2,781.12
2,920.18
26,148.96
27,456.41
28,829.23
30,270.69
31,784.23
33,373.44
35,042.11
Management
1257
12.57
13.20
13.86
14.55
15.28
16.04
16.85
Information System
2,179.08
2,288.03
2,402.44
2,522.56
2,648.69
2,781.12
2,920.18
(MIS) Assistant
26,148.96
27,456.41
28,829.23
30,270.69
31,784.23
33,373.44
35,042.11
Engineering
1519
15.19
15.95
16.75
17.59
18.47
19.39
20.36
Technician
2,633.35
2,765.02
2,903.27
3,048.44
3,200.86
3,360.90
3,528.95
31,600.25
33,180.26
34,839.27
36,581.24
38,410.30
40,330.81
42,347.35
Planning
1519
15.19
15.95
16.75
17.59
18.47
19.39
20.36
Technician
2,633.35
2,765.02
2,903.27
3,048.44
3,200.86
3,360.90
3,528.95
31,600.25
33,180.26
34,839.27
36,581.24
38,410.30
40,330.81
42,347.35
Community Relations
1519
15.19
15.95
16.75
17.59
18.47
19.39
20.36
Coordinator
2,633.35
2,765.02
2,903.27
3,048.44
3,200.86
3,360.90
3,528.95
31,600.25
33,180.26
34,839.27
36,581.24
38,410.30
40,330.81
42,347.35
Secretary to the
1635
16.35
17.16
18.02
18.92
19.87
20.86
21.91
City Manager
2,833.35
2,975.02
3,123.77
3,279.96
3,443.96
3,616.16
3,796.96
34,000.23
35,700.25
37,485.26
39,359.52
41,327.50
43,393.87
45,563.56
Assistant Civil
1635
16.35
17.16
18.02
18.92
19.87
20.86
21.91
Engineer
2,833.35
2,975.02
3,123.77
3,279.96
3,443.96
3,616.16
3,796.96
34,000.23
35,700.25
37,485.26
39,359.52
41,327.50
43,393.87
45,563.56
Assistant Planner
1635
16.35
17.16
18.02
18.92
19.87
20.86
21.91
2,833.35
2,975.02
3,123.77
3,279.96
3,443.96
3,616.16
3,796.96
34,000.23
35,700.25
37,485.26
39,359.52
41,327.50
43,393.87
45,563.56
Sec to the City Mgr/
1890
18.90
19.84
20.83
21.88
22.97
24.12
25.32
Office Manager
3,275.60
3,439.38
3,611.35
3,791.92
3,981.51
4,180.59
4,389.62
39,307.22
41,272.58
43,336.21
45,503.02
47,778.17
50,167.08
52,675.43
Community Relations
1897
18.97
19.92
20.92
21.96
23.06
24.21
25.42
Manager
3,288.38
3,452.80
3,625.44
3,806.71
3,997.05
4,196.90
4,406.74
39,460.55
41,433.58
43,505.25
45,680.52
47,964.54
50,362.77
52,880.91
Assistant to the
1897
18.97
19.92
20.92
21.96
23.06
24.21
25.42
City Manager
3,288.38
3,452.80
3,625.44
3,806.71
3,997.05
4,196.90
4,406.74
39,460.55
41,433.58
43,505.25
45,680.52
47,964.54
50,362.77
52,880.91
Superintendent of
1897
18.97
19.92
20.92
21.96
23.06
24.21
25.42
Parks/Maintenance
3,288.38
3,452.80
3,625.44
3,806.71
3,997.05
4,196.90
4,406.74
39,460.55
41,433.58
43,505.25
45,680.52
47,964.54
50,362.77
52,880.91
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1997-98
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Senior Accountant
1897 18.97
19.92
20.92
21.96
23.06
24.21
25.42
3,288.38
3,452.80
3,625.44
3,806.71
3,997.05
4,196.90
4,406.74
39,460.55
41,433.58
43,505.25
45,680.52
47,964.54
50,362.77
52,880.91
Associate Planner
1987 19.87
20.86
21.91
23.00
24.15
25.36
26.63
3,444.32
3,616.54
3,797.36
3,987.23
4,186.59
4,395.92
4,615.72
41,331.84
43,398.43
45,568.35
47,846.77
50,239.11
52,751.06
55,388.62
Associate Engineer
1987 19.87
20.86
21.91
23.00
24.15
25.36
26.63
3,444.32
3,616.54
3,797.36
3,987.23
4,186.59
4,395.92
4,615.72
41,331.84
43,398.43
45,568.35
47,846.77
50,239.11
52,751.06
55,388.62
Transportation
1987 19.87
20.86
21.91
23.00
24.15
25.36
26.63
Planner
3,444.32
3,616.54
3,797.36
3,987.23
4,186.59
4,395.92
4,615.72
41,331.84
43,398.43
45,568.35
47,846.77
50,239.11
52,751.06
55,388.62
Accounting Manager
2039 20.39
21.41
22.48
23.61
24.79
26.03
27.33
3,535.01
3,711.76
3,897.34
4,092.21
4,296.82
4,511.66
4,737.25
42,420.08
44,541.08
46,768.14
49,106.54
51,561.87
54,139.96
56,846.96
Senior Planner
2136 21.36
22.43
23.55
24.73
25.96
27.26
28.63
3,702.64
3,887.78
4,082.16
4,286.27
4,500.59
4,725.62
4,961.90
44,431.72
46,653.30
48,985.97
51,435.27
54,007.03
56,707.38
59,542.75
Senior Engineer
2136 21.36
22.43
23.55
24.73
25.96
27.26
28.63
3,702.64
3,887.78
4,082.16
4,286.27
4,500.59
4,725.62
4,961.90
44,431.72
46,653.30
48,985.97
51,435.27
54,007.03
56,707.38
59,542.75
City Clerk
2319 23.19
24.35
25.56
26.84
28.18
29.59
31.07
4,018.95
4,219.90
4,430.89
4,652.43
4,885.06
5,129.31
5,385.78
48,227.38
50,638.75
53,170.69
55,829.22
58,620.68
61,551.71
64,629.30
Community Services
2319 23.19
24.35
25.56
26.84
28.18
29.59
31.07
Director
4,018.95
4,219.90
4,430.89
4,652.43
4,885.06
5,129.31
5,385.78
48,227.38
50,638.75
53,170.69
55,829.22
58,620.68
61,551.71
64,629.30
Assistant Finance
2319 23.19
24.35
25.56
26.84
28.18
29.59
31.07
Director
4,018.95
4,219.90
4,430.89
4,652.43
4,885.06
5,129.31
5,385.78
48,227.38
50,638.75
53,170.69
55,829.22
58,620.68
61,551.71
64,629.30
Deputy PW Director
2571 25.71
26.99
28.34
29.76
31.25
32.81
34.45
4,456.27
4,679.08
4,913.04
5,158.69
5,416.62
5,687.46
5,971.83
53,475.25
56,149.01
58,956.46
61,904.29
64,999.50
68,249.47
71,661.95
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1997-98
JOB TITLE A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Deputy City Manager 3172 31.72
33.31
34.97
36.72
38.56
40.49
42.51
5,498.49
5,773.41
6,062.08
6,365.19
6,683.45
7,017.62
7,368.50
65,981.86
69,280.95
72,745.00
76,382.25
80,201.36
84,211.43
88,422.00
City Manager 3468 40.15
42.16
44.26
46.48
48.80
51.24
53.80
6,959.08
7,307.03
7,672.38
8,056.00
8,458.80
8,881.74
9,325.83
83,508.91
87,684.35
92,068.57
96,672.00
101,505.60
106,580.88
111,909.92
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1997-98
PART TIME/ HOURLY
JOB TITLE
A B C D
E
F
G
Comm. Svcs Leader
5.37 5.79 6.31 6.84
7.37
7.89
8.41
Community Svcs Leader H
7.53 7.89 8.41 8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Intern/Part-Time
7.53 7.89 8.41 8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Parks Mice Helper
7.53 7.89 8.41 8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Transportation Clerk
8.59 9.02 9.47 9.94
10.44
10.96
11.51
Counter Clerk/Permit Tech
13.43 14.10 14.81 15.55
16.32
17.14
18.00
d r �
Io n d 01
fL&g.l
INDUSTRY
MACHINERY
4- = SALES, INC.
QUALITY USED MACHINE TOOLS • SINCE 1945 �.
� Cn
City of Diamond Bar ,
21660 Copley Dr. Suite 100August 30,1997
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
Subject: Parking on Washington St.
Dear City Council:
We believe it to be unnecessary to prohibit commercial truck
parking on Washington St. for the following reasons:
1. Washington Street is not a residential street contrary
to the findings of the Traffic Commission because:
a) The street is 64' wide (4 travel + 2 parking)
which meets the criteria for an arterial inmost any
city.
b) there are no residential properties with frontage
(or access for that matter) on Washington untill you get
to the very end.
c) there is a right of way barrier between the street
and the nearby residential use.
2. The Sherrif's representitive revealed at the Traffic
Commission meeting that there is already an ordinance that
allows only 30 minute parking of commercial vehicles in a
Commercial/Industrial zone
It is this writers opinion that the residential use nearby is
noncorming because the zoning was all industrial around here
when we came in 1955.
We believe posting this street for no commercial parking is
beyond what the residents have requested (except one who
brought up appearance) and will add additonal maintenance
expense for the city without significant benefits.
Sincerely,
G. K nnedy
21015 Washington St. • Walnut, California 91789-3276 0 Phone (714) 595-3131 • FAX (714) 595-2402