Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/15/1997City Council AGEND. Tuesday, July 15, 1997 6:30 p.m. Regular Meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Bob Huff Caro l Herrera Council Member Eileen Ansari Council Member Clair Harmony Council Member City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Gary Werner Terrence L. Belanger Michael Jenkins Lynda Burgess Copies of staff reports, or other written documentation relating to agenda items, are on file in the C City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 19� the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistanc accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses icled paper and encourages you to do e same. PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member of the public may address Ihe Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject mat or jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in writing to I ie City Clerk. As a general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or t ie total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and tie business of the Council. Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks toward Council Members or other persons. Comments which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City Council and will not be tolerated. If not complied with, you will forfeit your remaining time as ordered by the Chair. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with put tic comment on items previously considered by the Council_ (Does not apply to Committee meetings) In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at le st 72 hours prior to the Council meeting. In cases of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the pasting -of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Council may act on an Rem that is not on the posted agenda. CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respi act to a regular or special meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. A. Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member of the thereof, tending to interrupt the due and ordE rly course of said meeting.. B. A breach of the peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and ordE rly course of said meeting. C. Disobedience of any lawful order of the Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from addressing the Board; and D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72 hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computei through a phone modem. Every meeting of the City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ANDA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the pul speaking area. Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business d; in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Frid HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Information (909) 860-2489 NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA. 1. CLOSED SESSION: 2. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: Next Resolution No. 97 5 Next Ordinance No. 04(19 7) None 6:30 p.m. July 15, 1997 Mayor Huff Dr. Robert Wiley, Jr. Northminster Presbyterian ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Harmony, Werner, Mayor Prc Tem Herrera, Mayor Huff APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Huff 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to providc an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values yourcomm ts, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot ake any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. P1 ase 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "DWIGHT KENNEDY'S DIXIE KI GS" (Dixieland)- July 16, 1997 - 6:30-8:00 p.m., Syca ore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - July 22, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., QMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. - First Public Hearing on Development Code (9 consecutive Tuesdays). 5.3 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "CRAZY RHYTHM HOT SOC ETY ORCHESTRA" (Roaring 201s) - July 23, 1997 - 6:30- :00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - July 24, 1997 - �:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 2 5.5 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "MID WEST COAST" (Top 40 Contemporary) - July 30, 1997 - 6:30-8:00 p.m., Syc more Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - August 5, 1997 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Me ting of May 22, 1997 - Receive & file. Requested by: Community Services Director 6.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated July 15, 1997 in the amount of $397,285.76. Requested by: City Manager 6.3 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Charmaine Santos Jun 18, 1997. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council reject the Claim and refer the matter for fu then action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Manager Requested by: City Clerk 6.4 (A) AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ASPEN GROVE - At the May 6, 1997 meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97-30 approving plans and specifications for construction of sidewalks on Aspen Grove Ln. Further, Council authorized and directed the City Clerk to advertise and receive bids. Notic to bidders was published on May 12, 1997. Eight bids were submitted and opened on June 9, 1997 and the apparent low bidder was Chino Construction. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the ity Council award the proposed contract to Chino Construction for construction of sidewalks on Aspen Grove Ln. in an amount not to exceed $24,990. It is further recomme ded that the Council authorize a contingency amount of $2,500 for project change orders to be approved by the ity Manager, for a total authorization of $27,490. ($) AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ASPEN GROVE LANE - At the May 6, 1997 meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97-30 approving specifications for construction of sidewalk3 on Aspen Grove Ln. On May 9, 1997 the Department of Pu lic Works solicited proposals for Professional Inspec ion JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 3 Services for this construction. Three proposals were received on May 16, 1997 and Dewan, Lundin, & Associates was the most qualified proposer. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award an inspection service contract to D wan, Lundin & Associates for Professional Inspection Ser ices for construction of sidewalks on Aspen Grove Ln. in an amount not to exceed 54,330. It is further recomm nded that the Council authorize a contingency amount of $500 for project change orders to be approved by the City Manager, for a total authorization of $4,830. Requested by: City Engineer 6.5 RESOLUTION NO. 91-72B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-72A PRESCRIBING A ME'T'HOD OF DRAWING WARRANTS AND CHECKS UPON CITY FUNDS - On June 17, 1997, Council adopted the FY 97- 98 Municipal Budget. Included with adoption of the budget was approval of the reorganization plan hich included a classification change of Accounting Manag r to Assistant Finance Director. Resolution No. 91-72A authorized the Mayor, City Treasurer and the Accounting Manager to sign City warrants and checks. Resclutio No 91--72B changes the authorized signatures to Mayor, ity Treasurer and Asst. Finance Director. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the ity Council adopt Resolution No. 91-72B amending Resolution No. 91-72A, prescribing a method of drawing warrants an checks upon City funds. Requested by: City Manager 6.6 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU CIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE ELECTION OF JOHN FASANA AS VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX supporting election of John Fasana as Vice Chairman of Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Requested by: Mayor Huff 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as mat can be heard. None 8. OLD BUSINESS: 'ity the the _ers JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 4 8.1 REQUEST TO REVIEW THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICA IONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96 9) - On May 6, 1997, Council voted to call for review o the decision of the Planning Commission approving Condit onal Use Permit (CUP) 96-10 and Development Review (DR) 96-9 for installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 22401 Darrin Dr. The issue before the Council is whether or not to uphold the decision off the Commission. Continued from July 1, 1997. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of the Planning CommiSion and direct staff as appropriate. Requested by: Community Development Director 8.2 ORDINANCE NO. XX(1997): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITZ OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF - On May 6, 1997, Council directed preparation of a draft urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the issuance of permits for wireless telecommunication facilities. On May 20, 1997, Council received public testimony, discussed the pro oral and continued the matter. The issue before Counci is whether or not to enact the proposed ordinance. Cont'nued from July 1, 1997. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council consider the urgency ordinance and direct staff as appropriate. Requested by: Community Development Director 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCU' CIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAKING AN ELECTION PURSUAN TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33676 - The Health and Safety Code provides for the election (choice), hy a legislative body (City Council), prior to the adoptioa of a redevelopment plan, for tax increment financing t be allocated its pass-through share of any tax increment allowable to affected taxing agencies. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the ity Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX making an election pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Requested by: City Manager 8.4 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 03(1997): AN ORDINNCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND AR. JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 5 CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA - Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 03(1997) approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. Requested by: City Manager 8.5 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY CF AN ADVISORY MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED REDEVELO MENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION A EA - At its meeting of July 1, 1997, Council introduced an ordinance approving the redevelopment plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area"). Council also directed staff to research and prepare necessary documentation to subject the Redevelopment Plan to a vote of the electors. The City Attorney's research reveals that a redevelopment plan cannot be adopted or repealed by initiative. However, Council may hold an advisory election. In order to meet the L.A. County deadlines to place an advisory measure on the November 4, 1997 ballot, Council must adopt the proposed Resolution at its July 15, 1997 meeting. (a) RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITZ OF AN ADVISORY MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA IN THE CITZ AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1997, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 97-46. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the ity Council consider adoption of Resolution No. 9 -XX ordering the submission to the qualified electors of the City of an advisory measure. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, SET ING PRIORITIES FOR FILING A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A PITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE! AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS. Recommended Action: It is recommended Council consider adoption of Resolution No. priorities for filing a written argument. Requested by: City Council that the 97 -XX settity ing JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 6 8.6 APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE TO THE "SAFER" BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council appoint a Representative and an Alternate t( "Safer" Board of Directors. Requested by: Mayor Huff 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 City the RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBI`T'ING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD TO SOUTH ALDER LANE - In order to mitigate noise creat d by parked semi -trucks with refrigeration units on WashirLgtOn St., the Traffic & Transportation Commission and staff recommend a parking prohibition for commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both zides of Washington street from Brea Canyon Rd. to South lder Ln. All residents on Washington St. have been notified of this matter and have been invited to attend this meeting. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97 ---XX prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parkina on both sides of Washington St. from Brea Canyon Rd to South Alder Ln. Requested by: City Engineer 9.2 RANCH FESTIVAL REQUEST FOR USE OF PETERSON PARK - The organizers of the Ranch Festival have submitted a request seeking the use of Peterson Park as the location for the 1997 Ranch Festival. The Parks & Recreation Commission considered this request at its June 12 and June 26, 1997 meetings and voted 3-0 (two Commissioners were absent to recommend that Council not permit the Ranch Festiva to use Peterson Park for the 1997 event, due to a con ern for the possible negative impact the event could hav on the park. Recommended Action: It is recommended that Council not permit the Ranch Festival to use Park for the 1997 event. Requested by: Community Services Director RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING the �ity Pete son JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 7 Next Resolution: R-97-11 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Werner ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Ha mony Herrera, VC/Huff, C/Werner 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Agency on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest tc. the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Redevelopment Agency values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Agency gene ally cannot take any action on items not listed on the p sted agenda. Please complete a Sneaker's Carr9 anri rr77rn ;+- Redevelopment Agencv. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 3.1.1 Regular Meeting of June 3, 1997 - Appro7 submitted. Continued from July 1, 1997. 3.1.2 Regular meeting of June 17, 1997 - Approi submitted. Continued from July 1, 1997. Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated 15, 1997 in the amount of $44,547.77. Requested by: Executive Director 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: 5.1 as as y RESOLUTION NO. R -97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL EAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1997 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1998, INCLUDING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH - Submitted for approval and adoption is the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Budget for FY 9798. Continued from July 1, 1997. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the JULY 15, 1997 PAGE 8 Redevelopment Agency adopt Resolution No. R -37 -XX adopting the FY 97-98 Diamond Bar Redevelopment .Agency Budget. 5.2 RESOLUTION NO. R -97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING ITS POLICY TO ACCOMPLISH REDEVELOPMENT OF THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA WITHOUT EMINENT DOMAIN - on July 1, 1997, Co ncil introduced an ordinance approving a redevelopment plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area"). D ring discussion of the ordinance, Council directed staf to prepare a resolution for the Diamond Bar Redevelo ment Agency (the "Agency") declaring a policy not to us its power of eminent domain. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Dimond Bar Redevelopment Agency consider adoption of the attached resolution and direct staff as appropriat . Requested by: City Council 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual I Members are for Agency discussion. Direction may be gi-\ this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action future meeting. 8. AGENCY SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10. COUNCIL SUB --COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council Mei are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a fi meeting. 12. ADJOURNMENT: ency n at at a Pers "-his zure CITY OF DIAMOND BAR "QUICK CAP" MINUTES JULY 15, 1997 1. CLOSED SESSION: 2. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: Presbyterian Church None 6:Lto P.M. Dr. Robert Wiley, Ncrthmidster ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Werner, MPI'/Herrera, M/Huff. C/Harmony was excused. Also present were: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Frank Usher, Deputy City Manager; Amanda Susskind, Assistant City Attorney; George Wentz, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director, Linda Magnuson Assistant Finance Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: No 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Elizabeth Beard, re parking limitations on Birch Hill Drive due to D.B.H.S. student parking on this street. Street sweeping cannot be accomplished and traffic jams take place every day. Ellen Stipo re cellular antenna moratorium - felt public was unaware of what these cell sites are. Has discovered hat over 200 cities have adopted moratoriums on sites in residential areas. Felt that residential sites were inappropriate. Debby O'Connor - Announced that Walnut now allows teenager to utilize their dial -a -ride program. Suggested that D.B. do the same. Clyde Hennessee - Objected to the taxpayers to paying for teenagers to utilize dial -a -ride. Spoke regarding fur her improvements needed to be made to Sunset Crossing, Don Schad - Pointed out all things he had done over the ast 8 years to help the City. Terry Birrell re 8.4 and 8.5 - Complained that Council c uld adopt the Redevelopment Agency before considering whethe to place the matter on the ballot. Mike Goldenberg -- D.B.I.A. will hold first annual "Paintour Town Project" to help paint two homes. Asked for volunte rs, coordinated by Mr. & Mrs. Ignacio Covarrubias, Dianne For ing or Bob Zirbes. 5. M Frank Dursa - Opposed giving free rides to students in D.B. Council should give City Tile to Don Schad for all he has done for the City. Wilbur Smith - Concerned that the items regarding approval of Redevelopment and removal of eminent domain were in the rang order of adoption. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "DWIGHT KENNEDY'S DIXIE KINGS" (Dixieland) - July 16, 1997 - 6:30-8:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - July 22, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. - First Public Heari g on Development Code (9 consecutive Tuesdays). 5.3 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "CRAZY RHYTHM HOT SOCIETY ORCHESTRA" (Roaring 201s) - July 23, 1997 - 6:30-8:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 E. Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - July 24, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.5 CONCERT IN THE PARK - "MID WEST COASTS` (Top 40 Contemporary) - July 30, 1997 - 6:30-8:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. Dr. 5.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - August 5, 1997 - 6:30 p.m., kQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved by C/Werner, seconded by C/Ansa i to approve Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0-1 by Roll all vote (C/Harmony absent). 6.1 RECEIVED & FILED PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUT S - Regular Meeting of May 22, 1997.. 6.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated July 15, 1997 in the amount of $397,285.76. 6.3 REJECTED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Charmaine Sa to$ June 18, 1997 and referred the matter for further ac ion to Carl Warren & Co., the City's risk manager. 6.4 (A) AWARDED CON'T'RACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ASPEN GROVE - to Chino Construction in an amount no to exceed $24,990 and authorized a contingency amount of $2,500 for project change orders to be approved by the City Manager, for a total authorization of $27,490. (B) AWARDED CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ASPEN GROVE LANE - to Dewan, Lundin & Assoc. in an amount not to exceed $4,330 and authorized a contingency amount of 500 for project change orders to be approved by the Qity Manager, for a total authorization of $4,830. 6.5 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 97-72B: A RESOLUTION OF THEITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING RESOLD TON NO. 91-72A PRESCRIBING A METHOD OF DRAWING WARRANT AND CHECKS UPON CITY FUNDS. 6.6 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 97-56: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE ELECTION OF JOHN FASANA AS VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AU'T'HORITY. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as ma ters can be heard. None. 8. OLD BUSINESS: 8.1 REQUEST TO REVIEW THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9) - Continued from July 1, 1997. DCM/DeStefano reported that the applicant had requested a 12 -month temporary approval of this cell site. Moved by C/Herrera to direct staff to prepare a Resolution for the next Council meeting- to modify the Planning Commission's action and add two conditions: 12 month approval and some type of security provided by applicant to guarantee the 12 month temporary appro al. C/Werner amended the motion to include the Counc'l's updated plans. C/Herrera accepted C/Werner's amendm nts to her motion. Motion carried 3-1-1 by Roll Call vote (C/Harmony absent. 8.2 ORDINANCE XX (1997): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DI OND BAR ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF - Continued from July 1, 1997. Don Schad - Spoke against approval of the tempoary placement of the antenna on Darrin Dr. Robert Delzman, right-of-way consultant for MetroCom, Inc. - no need for a moratorium; long-standing existing applications should be exempted; and applications for antennas in commercial areas should be exempted. Urged Council to shorten the length of a moratorium, if it must be imposed. Martha Bruske - How many ordinances have been adoted during the life- of the City and how many of these are being enforced. How many CUP's and how many enforc d? Dr. Lawrence Rhodes - Pointed out the State Atto General's opinion regarding urgency ordinances. Jerry Hamilton - What liability would the City have at the Darrin Dr. site and could the City require the property owner to have $1,000,000 liability insuran e? Mrs. Stipo - Disappointed that Council approved Ithe Darrin Site. C/Werner - include condition that antenna should n�t be visible, should be screened, should be below grade, etc. C/Werner moved to adopt urgency ordinance but to e empt those projects which have already received final approval or those structures or facilities within the City's public rights-of-way and other City -owned properties. C/Ansari seconded. Motion carried 4-0-1 (C/Harmony absent). 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-57: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU CIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAKING AN ELECTION PURSU T TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33676 - Felice Acosta explained the meaning of this Resolution. Moved by C/Werner, seconded by MPT/Herrera to a opt Resolution NO. 97-57. Motion carried 4-0-1 by Roll all vote (C/Harmony absent). 8.4 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 03(1997): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAP FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA - Wilbur Smith - 8.3 should have been included in original documentation and this appears to be cleaning up loose ends --felt this was inappropriate. Stated that changes including exclusion of several properties have not been incorporated in the Redevelopment Plan. Don Schad - Did not understand how the City c�uld consider itself "blighted." Debby O'Connor - Concerned that the opponents to redevelopment have offered no alternatives to impro ing the City's economic status. Seems that the cnly alternative would be to raise taxes which is unacceptable. Terry Birrell - Asked that a final Redevelopment P1a be prepared and distributed to the public. Again poited out that she was opposed to the plan. Jack Kowtoski - Provide the citizens a guaranteehat redeveloped properties will not become vacant with i 5 years time. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes - Suggested that an election be held to let citizens vote on the details of the plan. Lye Kennedy - Couldn't most of the work be paid for through Gas tax funds? Jerry Hamilton - Didn't feel the public was educated 0 enough on redevelopment. C/Werner moved, seconded by MPT/Herrera to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 03 (1997). Mc tion carried 4-0-1 by Roll Call vote (C/Harmony absent). 8.5 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY ANADVISORY MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED REDEVELOIF MENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AEA - A. RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF AN ADVISORY MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED PLAN FCR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA IN THE CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1997, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 97-16 - Moved by C/Werner, seconded by C/Ansari to adopt. Motion failed 2-2-1 by Roll Call vote (MPT/Herrera and M/ uff voted no; C/Harmony absent). B. RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS - Not considered for adoption due to failure of Item 8.5A. 8.6 APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE TO THE "SAFER" BOARD OF DIRECTORS - Continued to August 5, 1 97. NEW BUSINESS: 9.1 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU CIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING COMMER IAL VEHICLES OVER FIVE TONS (10,000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON BOTH -SIDES OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAI TO SOUTH ALDER LANE - Dr. Lawrence Rhodes - Concerned a out the trucks obstructing view of vehicles coming onto Brea Canyon Rd. from Lincoln. Not concerned about weight, or refrigeration noise. Mr_ Kennedy's vehicles do not Cause his neighborhood any problems. Lye Kennedy - Also concerned about line of sight probems as well as air pollution caused by the big trucks eft running for 2-3 days. Eric Flodine, 21239 Cottonwood Ln. - Refrigerator is a problem for his neighbors. Concerned aesthetics --there were 8 trucks parked in the tonight. n ise a out rea Lyle Kennedy - Suggested an ordinance prohibiting leaving of engines running on City streets. the 1. 2 Moved by C/Werner to send the issue back to Traffic & Transportation Commission to provide more public n tice and to ask them to consider other input and consider other options. Seconded by C/Ansari. Motion carri d 4- 0-1 (C/Harmony absent). 9.2 RANCH FESTIVAL REQUEST FOR USE OF PETERSON PARK - teve Johnson spoke in support of the request on behalf of the Ranch Festival. M/Huff moved, MPT/Herrera seconded to sustain the P & Recreation Commission's denial of the request bu direct staff to work with the Ranch Festival to dev other options. Motion carried 4-0-1 by Roll Cali (C/Harmony absent). RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING - 11:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairman Werner Agency VC/Huff, excused, arks to slop rote Members Ansari, Herr ra, C/Werner. AM/Harmony was Also present were: James DeStefano, Deputy City Mana er; Frank Usher, Deputy City Manager; Amanda Susskind, Assistant Agency Attorney; George Wentz, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Linda Magnuson, Assis ant Finance Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Clyde Hennessee - Praised the Coucil on the open discussion regarding redevelopment. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: Moved. by AM/Herrera, seconded AM/Ansari to approve the Consent Calendar_ Motion Carrie( 0-1 by Roll Call vote (AM/Harmony absent). 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES 3.1.1 Regular Meeting- of June 3, 1997 - submitted. submitted. 3.1.2 Regular Meeting of June 17, 1997 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated July 15, 1997 in amount of $44,547.77. by 4- sm- As 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. OLD BUSINSS: 5.1 RESOLUTION NO. R-97-11: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND 13AR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET OR THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1997 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 19 8, INCLUDING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET . . . FORTH - AM/Ansari moved, seconded by AM/Herrera to dopt Resolution No. R-97-11 4--0-1 by Roll Call vote (AM/Harmony absent). 5.2 RESOLUTION NO. R-97-12: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMONE BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING ITS POLICY TO ACCOMPLISH REDEVELOPMENT OF THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC rREVITALIZATION AREA WITHOUT EMINENT DOMAIN - AM/Ansari moved, seconded by AM/Herrera to adopt Resolution No. R-97-12 as amended by adding wording to require a Public Hearing on eminent domain pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 3--452. Motion carried 4-0-1 by Roll Call vote (AM/Ha mony absent). &. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: None 8. AGENCY SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: None AGENCY ADJOURNMENT: 11:43 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 11:43 p.m. 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS: 12. ADJOURNMENT: 11:43 p.m_ TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK DATE: �1 t PHON AGENDA #/SUBJECT: _. PJAbL,�C I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Signature )SO --6 -oma utas reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: r CITY CLERK DATE: PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. I Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: ADDRESS:3%Z� ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/rSUBJECT• DATE: PHONE: � -3 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes refect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: J DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: -1) 5 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Mir utes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK 6 lCc_ �,d -✓,�G. DATE: r .- PHONE: �� i �1-,-'7 A e46 !i c I expect to address the Council on the subje name and address as written above. A" ct a enda i m. lease have the Council Minutes reflect my Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK _ DATE: PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Min tes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM:-7 DATE: 1'r ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT:, I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Millutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: '. ��� DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Mi utas reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK �� FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: p� PHONE: A /-/� I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Si ature reflect my 17U TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: PE <-/ PHONE S � 7 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Mi name and address as written above. Signature reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK ` FROM: ]-- r � c Q DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: * �- I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Sig utes reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: a ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: G I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Signature utes refect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK/. FROM: ur 1' 67, � � DATE: ADDRESS: 6 w PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. name and address as written above. I Please have the Council Minutes reflect my Signature TO: CITY CLERK FROM: D / Esme r DATE: ADDRESS: Z37ZS'n a'� ��Cac�c, Ocf—, PHONE ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 16, I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Signature fs, [T� reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITYCLERK y FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: 41-2, PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council M name and address as written above. Signature ref ect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: jt:�2-16- 6-or��,�� DATE: —765 ADDRESS: 2/2 ��/ Co��o•lr<la C PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: i I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council M name and .address as written above. Signature reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: � � %V v Q DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. Sign e Utes reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK 6,,JJ DATE: PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Min name and address as written above. Signature 91 reflect my 1* VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 42— I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please Have the Council Mir�u#es reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK • _DATE: -2ADDRESS: d �r,a t PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council name and address as written above. 4 Signature J M utes reflect my VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: -- PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council inutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION BOARD HEARING ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D. 21865 Copley Drive MAY 22, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Finnerty called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by C/Tye. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Finnerty, Vice -Chairman O'Connor, Commissioners, �ye, Medina and Holder Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose, Community Supervisor Wendy Bowman MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE - Richard Toomes, 760 N. Golden Springs Drive, asked the City to provide a fenced "pooch" park. He suggested use of the undeveloped Summitridge Park area and indicated that if he had access to a pooch park in the City, he would be more likely to purchase goods and services locally. VC/O'Connor stated she visited Claremont's pooch park and observed that the park maintained through private donations. C/Holder asked how decorum is maintained at the pooch park. Mr. Toomes responded that there is an unwritten rule that when unleashed dogs are in a confined area and became overly aggressive, the owner must immediately remove the animal. VC/O'Connor indicated that rules of conduct are posted at the Claremont park. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that input received so far during the Parks Master process has not indicated the need for a pooch park. He said he is not aware of any req from the community for the inclusion of a pooch park. May 22, 1997 Page 2 Parks & Recreation Commi CALENDAR OF EVENTS: CSD/Rose presented the Calendar of Events. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Approval of Minutes of April 24, 1997 Regular Meeting. VC/O'Connor requested the last paragraph on Page 5 be corrected to ind placement of a park bench and tree is to be at Heritage Park. not Sycar Canyon Park. VC/O'Connor moved, GMedina seconded, to approve the April 24, 1 minutes as corrected. The motion was approved 4-0-1 with C/Hc abstaining. INFORMATION ITEMS: 1. Recreation Update. CSS/Bowman presented the Recreation Update. 97 CSS/Bowman responded to Chair/Finnerty that she will investigate the rea on for the apparent discrepancy in the youth sports projected and final figures CSS/Bowman responded to GMedina that the City still conducts youth bowing classes. GTye asked CSS/Bowman to provide the Commission with a comparison of year's actual figures to this year's actual figures for purposes of projecting fu participation. CSD/Rose explained that the City of Brea runs annual figures from May 1 through April 30. Diamond Bar runs annual figures based on its fiscal y ar, July 1 through June 30. Diamond Bar uses four consecutive sessions, summer, fall, winter, and spring, for annual recreation statistics. C/Tye indicated he would like to have a comparison based onfur consecutive sessions, summer, fall, winter and spring. May 22, 1997 Page 3 Parks & Recreation Commission CSS/Bowman responded to VC/O'Connor that the indoor soccer will be ield at South Point Middle School. VC/O'Connor asked if the City has entered into a dialogue with Diamond Ranch High School for facilities use. CSS/Bowman indicated high school facilities are generally not availabW on week nights due to school activities. CSD/Rose stated that the dialogue between the City and Diamond Ranch igh School has related to the design of the facilities. VC/O'Connor suggested that the City participate with Diamond Point Elementary to provide the Halloween Haunted House event. CSS/Bowman indicated to VC/O'Connor that due to lack of response, the ity was unable to provide a "first defense" class for children at the karate ce ter next to the Community Center. VC/O'Connor suggested that the City contact the karate center for fu information regarding free instruction classes. Lillian Orejel, Senior Services Coordinator, explained the City's senior activities and organization schedules and indicated the annual revenues realized. SSC/Orejel responded to Chair/Finnerty that 100 percent of the related adult excursion general fund costs are recovered and 70 percent of costs funded With Proposition A funds are recovered. CDBG funding is utilized to subsidize 50 percent of the Senior excursion costs. CSD/Rose stated that all general fund costs for excursions are 100 perc nt recouped through fees charged. CSD/Rose reported on the Tiny Tots program. He invited the Commission to attend graduation ceremonies on June 9, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. at Heritage P Community Center. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that the City recovers 100 percent of Tiny Tot program costs. No profits are realized. May 22, 1997 Page 4 Parks & Recreation Commi4si VC/O'Connor thanked Wendy Bowman, Lillian Orejel and Marsha Ro for their dedication and hard work on the City's 8th Anniversary Celebration NEW BUSINESS: 1. Proposal from Coca-Cola to Install Soda Machines in the City's Parks as a Source of Revenue for the City. Gary Stitt, Coca-Cola, offered the placement of two types of vending machines in some of the City's parks. One type is a Coca-Cola plastic bottle vending machine called the "Genuine Coca-Cola Plastic Bottle" with a resealable plastic cap. The second type of machine is called the "PowerAde". He indicated that PowerAde is an isotonic drink designed to refresh the athlete. He expla ned that these machines are already placed in a variety of Diamond Bar sch ols. The machines utilize current technology, provide night illumination and contain security alarms. The vending machines include a protective "cage" covering. The company proposes that the machines be anchored on a cenient foundation. The machines contain dollar bill validators. Coca-Cola prop ses a $1.00 per unit charge for a 20 ounce bottle. Mr. Stitt proposed that at a $1.00 suggested price, Coca-Cola would provide a 25 percent commission to the City for a $6.00 profit per case for PowerAde and approximately $5.35 per case for carbonated drinks. Projected outdoor vending machine sales are seasonal and range from five cases to 25 cases per month, depending on the park's activity. He suggested that PowerAde nd carbonated drink machines be placed side-by-side for security reasons an to make maximum usage of a single power outlet. Mr. Stitt proposed the following six park sites for machine placem nt: Heritage, Maple Hill, Peterson, Ronald Reagan, Summitridge and Sycamore Canyon. C/Medina stated that in other businesses vendors offer as much as a 50 pE commission. He asked if the 25 percent commission is based upon net or sales. Mr. Stitt responded that the commission is based on gross sales per unit for PowerAde. The carbonated drink commission is after tax and CRV. Coca-Cola stacks and rotates the product for the City and maintains the machines on behalf of the City. In determining a commission split, Coca-Cola factors in the May 22, 1997 Page 5 Parks & Recreation Commission employee and equipment related costs. He stated that in his opinion, 25 percent is a generous commission split. Chair/Finnerty asked for explanation of the machine's efficiency rating and kilowatt hour usage in order to determine the City's rate of return. Mr. Stitt responded that outdoor vending machines generally cost $9. 0 to $12.00 per month in electrical costs to operate. Chair/Finnerty suggested the company include bottled water in the vending machines. C/Tye asked if the 25 percent commission rate is negotiable. Mr. Stitt responded that 25 percent commission is generous and he d believe there is any flexibility in this offer. not C/Tye asked for what period of time Coca-Cola intends to provide vending machines. Mr. Stitt responded that Coca-Cola will evaluate each location on its ()wr merits. Coca-Cola would like a 12 month commitment for the six locati ns. Chair/Finnerty asked how Coca-Cola determined the six proposed locations. Mr. Stitt responded that the six locations were based upon st ff'� recommendations and his knowledge of Diamond Bar parks. C/Tye asked if the food vending service is part of the Coca-Cola Company. Mr. Stitt responded that Coca-Cola has a separate dedicated vending oper The people who fill the vending machines are compensated on the num: cases placed. The vending maintenance department personnel carry pa their trucks and can make on the spot repairs. CITye asked how often the Lorbeer Middle School machines are serviced. Mr. Stitt responded that the machines are serviced twice weekly dependin volume. Two to three weeks into placement of the machines, an inver track should develop and service visits will be adjusted accordingly, of on on May 22, 1997 Page b Parks & Recreation Comm VC/O'Connor stated the Lorbeer Middle School machines are locked d ring the day and are only accessible after school hours in order to avoid competition with the contracted cafeteria food and drink service. She ask d if the machines proposed to be placed in the parks can be locked during a eats where drinks are supplied/sold by other organizations. CSD/Rose responded that negotiations could involve non -competition. C/Tye stated that if he brings beverage to the park he is not supporting the vendor selling drinks. If a vending machine is located in the park, hewould like the option to purchase from the organization providing drinks or fro the vending machine. C/Holder indicated she favors competition. Mr. Stitt offered to negotiate favorable terms. He pointed out that use of the vending machines during park events provides revenue to the City. Chair/Finnerty asked how many containers each machine holds. Mr. Stitt responded that the machines hold about 14 cases of 24 bottles per case. VC/O'Connor asked where the revenues would be placed and forhat purpose the monies would be used. CSD/Rose responded that any monies generated in this type of operation goes into the general fund. During the budget process a revenue source can be identified for special materials purchases. If this operation proves successful, during the budget process the annual revenue could be requested for park improvements, or any other parks and recreation use. City Council ultima ely determines the use of funds. VC/O'Connor asked if any other vendors have offered to provide vend ng machines. CSD/Rose stated the City has not approached or been approached by any vendors. C/Tye asked if Pepsi Cola offers a similar program. May 22, 1997 Page 7 Parks & Recreation Co Mr. Stitt responded that Pepsi has vending machines. He said he is not rivy to information regarding competitors locating on park sites. C/Holder asked what recourse the City has if the machines are not serviced. Mr. Stitt stated an 800 number is provided in order for the public to their concerns. C/Holder asked about machine down time Mr. Stitt responded that vending machine problems are rare. Repairsareniade at the site, if possible. C/iye asked if the City will receive more money than a retailer because Were is no up front money involved. Mr. Stitt referred the Commission to objective marketing information that indicates Coca-Cola's products outperform the competition by about ane -t ird. CSD/Rose calculated assumptions that indicated two machines at each of six City parks would generated a net annual revenue of approximately $8,006. C/Medina stated he favors placing vending machines in City parks. However, he is concerned about competing with other organizations. CSD/Rose explained that the City currently does not charge for ligh ing provided for youth group athletic functions and the City needs to pursu all avenues of revenue generation in order to recoup such costs. C/iye asked who would bear the cost of electrical installation. to accomm vending machine installations. Mr. Stitt stated that if Coca-Cola could utilize company contractors, he feels hat his company would pay for reasonable expenses for necessary concrete nd electrical installation. Chair/Finnerty stated she would like Pantera Park included as a pro installation site. May 22, 1997 Page 8 Parks & Recreation Commission Mr. Stitt responded to CSD/Rose that the vending machines are adaptable to sloped pads. II C/Holder asked if the machines are secured to buildings. Mr. Stitt explained that the cages surrounding the vending machines are secured to concrete pads. The vending machines can be bolted. However, experience indicates bolting the cage affords sufficient security. C(Holder suggested the machines be placed out of the sun and away from susceptible to wind. Mr. Stitt responded that machine visibility should more than compensate for the possibility that it may be subjected to sun and wind. The greater the visibility, the more likely the public is to purchase the product which sh uld outweigh the cost of keeping the machine cool. Mr. Stitt indicated to C/Tye that revenue and use projections for Diamond Bar are based upon figures from three vending machine installations in the Cily of Duarte parks and one installation at Pathfinder Park in Rowland Heights. Chair/Finnerty concurred with the proposed project as a means to gen revenue for the City and enhance the park's amenities. VC/O'Connor moved, C/Tye seconded, to accept the concept of installing machines in seven designated City's parks including Pantera Park, to gen revenue for the City. The motion was carried 5-0. INFORMATION ITEMS (Continued); 2. Summer Concerts In The Park Final Schedule. CSD/Rose presented the final Concerts In The Park schedule. The first con will be held at Sycamore Canyon Park on June 25, 1997. VC/O'Connor asked if the City has purchased banners to advertise Concert In The Park. CSD/Rose responded that banners were not included in this year's budget. stop shelter ads will be posted and posters will be placed in grocery May 22, 1997 windows. Page 9 Parks & Recreation Commilsi 3. Brush Fire in Sycamore Canyon Park. CSD/Rose reported that approximately 150 firefighters responded Sycamore Canyon Park brush fire due to its proximity to residences. was contained to approximately one acre of vegetation. CSD/Rose responded to VC/O'Connor that erosion should not be a and that he expects the area to revegetate itself within one year. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Parks Master Plan Update. tol the Thd fire CSD/Rose stated Purkiss Rose -RSI continues to work on the draft master p Staff anticipates the updated document will be resubmitted next week. will review and return the document to the consultant for updating on turn 1997. The final draft will be presented to the Parks and Recreai Commissioners for review by June 13, 1997. The document will be avails for public review at the City Library and City Hall. If approved, a pul workshop will be held at 7:00 p.m. on June 24, 1997 at Heritage F Community Center. The item will also be agendized for the June 26, 1 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting for further discussion recommendation. If the document requires. further consideration, a spe4 Commission meeting could be scheduled for July 8 or July 10, 1997. The Commission concurred to schedule the public workshop for 7:00 p.m, June 24, 1997 at Heritage Park Community Center. 2. Request from Resident to Post Rattlesnake Warning Signs at Sycamore CSD/Rose reported that the City Attorney stated the City has a duty to warn public about known hazards that exist in the park's improved areas. 5 recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the ( Council the posting of rattlesnake warning signs at Sycamore Canyon Park. Following discussion, Chair/Finnerty moved, C/Tye seconded, to recommE to the City Council the posting of rattlesnake warning signs at Sycam+ Canyon Park. The motion was approved 5-0. 4, on ale lic 97 nd :ial m May 22, 1997 Page 10 Parks & Recreation Cornmiksion NEW BUSINESS (Continued): 2. Golfing in the City Parks. CSD/Rose presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the City Council that "golf and practicing golf' be added to the list of activities that are prohibited in theity's Parks and that violators be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Following discussion, C/Tye moved, Chair/Finnerty seconded to recom end to the City Council that "golf and practicing golf" be added to the list of activities that are prohibited in the City's Parks. The motion was carried -0. CSD/Rose stated that the signage text will be brought back to the Commi'ion for consideration prior to signs being placed in the parks. He went on to state that all appropriate park rules will be included on a single sign. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Tye welcomed Commissioner Holder. C/Tye said that although he is not a proponent of art in the park, he likes the "Ode to Diamond Bar". He asked if the City is contemplating removing trees in the area of the statue. CSD/Rose responded that he has not received a request for tree removal. He is aware that lighting and clearing for line of sight is under consideration but that this coulc be accomplished with tree trimming rather than tree removal. C/Tye asked for a Larkstone Park update. CSD/Rose stated he will meet with the Walnut Valley Unified School District Assi tant Superintendent of Schools Vernon Medeiros tomorrow morning to discuss Paul C. Grow ark and Larkstone Park. He indicated he will provide the Commission an update at the junE 26, 1997 Commission meeting. C/Tye asked CSD/Rose to pursue the Oscar Law tribute May 22, 1997 Page 17 Parks & Recreation Commission C/Tye advised he will be unable to attend the June 24, 1997 Parks Master Plan Pblic Workshop and the June 26, 1997 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. CJHolder advised that the Rotarians have agreed to donate approximately 40 to 50 tres to be planted at Ronald Reagan Park. VC/O'Connor welcomed Commissioner Holder to the Commission. She request d a breakdown of costs related to the "Ode to Diamond Bar" statue installation at Summitr dge Park and asked that the item be agendized for the June 26, 1997 Commission meeting. VC/O'Connor invited the Commissioners to attend the AYSO Cottontail Tournament w ich will be held from Friday, May 30, 1997 through Sunday, June 1, 1997 at CalPoly Pon ona and Mount San Antonio College. Approximately 5,000 people will be in the Dia and Bar/Walnut area as a result of this tournament. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that amenities such as "The Whale" will be consid red for Heritage Park as a part of the ADA retrofit upgrade project. He indicated that he anticipates construction will begin during the Summer of 1998. ADJOURNMENT: C/Tye moved, C -/Medina seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no obj Chair/Finnerty adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m. ■ ns, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Pro Tem Herrera and Councilmember Ansari 1 FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Registers, July 15, 1997 DATE: July 10, 1997 Attached are the Voucher Registers dated July 15, 1996. You ill notice there are two voucher registers. This is due to the Fiscal Year ending June 30. There is a register for expenditures allocated to FY96-97 and one for FY97-98. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher registers for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to their entry on the Consent Calendar. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the f nal approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listings of vouchers dated July 15, 1997 have lbeen reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts: FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 001 General Fund 112 Prop A Fund -Transit 115 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund 118 Air Quality Improvement Fund 125 CDBG Fund 138 LLAD 438 Fund 139 LLAD #39 Fund 141 LLAD #41 Fund 250 CIP Fund TOTAL ALL FUNDS APPROVED BY: Linda G. Md g„ uson Assistant Finance Director Terrence L. Belanger City Manager r_i00104111 $222,417.93 39,802.21 9,670.00 1,267.99 802.47 928.81 7,035.33 928.81 114,432.21 $397,285.76 Carol A. Herrera Mayor Pro Tem Eileen R. Ansari Councilmember ! Ic o _ -m r TIME: ''i�°-z" il7r sn7 v it '1 _ �` - ., ., £ ��� . r .`rte=__ r;J!!, r _ f -,EIDi3ft NAME V-KDOR I.D. :COI T R'C PO.LINE,IINOr. ENTP' /C` IHtOICE DE r, �, - PdT uSJMi P., O,T-h36 BATCH r i�E O: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'-------- AT & T AT&T OI -40,70-21€5 10c: +:7156 107109 0,61130 LunaYianca Fnu 95.1,3 TOTAL DLE VD -411 -MR --•------ 'a .011, AT& r 001-4090-2125 Accurate Laridscace 1.�)-4539- 210 1301 -4310-114 00 3? -45-19-1,500 �,1'1-4311`53v51J ;P71 -4J1;{- -a;0 001-43161-5300 C(L 1-4 f19-5 -TC,C-, '501-43:.2-5300 101-4.315-5.00 4S28 -5-'K,,,0 1001-4331-1Kk 0,01-4331-5300 Accurate L_ndsc.3�,e CY)1-431 G-.210 001-4S"13-"22101 _ . 001-4311-z 10 301-4;131'-'210 1 Ja-40 0 001-432'-2-210 222- Ansari, Eileen C01-4010-2-325 j!,1-40101 23 AT&T 104 Ml i S6 Accurate a7ea715B 0114624 94 st715B 01,14610 26 ;3'07156 11) 1i46 ? 25 007156 01 /'4525 2s 07152 02114625 118 8071156 03/4625 26 607156 0414625 24 &07156 05/46i5 F f l tl.�k [B _ 4 225 25 07152 07/4A25 66 807156 01/50'54 F� 60715B 08/4625 Accurate 42 807115B `,4/452y6. 60 W71� 02/4626 39 811/156 01114646 55 8071 08/4=',L6 62 6117156 0514626 21 007156 06/466 40 807106 031466 44 80715E 01/Z51 AnsariE 90 34715E 7B `0" U 713 07/09 06f,V 07/09 06/30 42it-r4 07/09 03130 43811 50710; 061:0 40043 07I09 006.1 ,}51 40882 07109 06/30 4RK-2 U17/09 l,b, -' 13000 0"'109 06/36 43KS 07/09 06.11?0 4,.5 62 . 0711 ± 011[ 130 V 3 'L 07M 06/30 ' 8822 07IV" e /:fit 480132' 07109 06,30 488K Long 0l5tance Phne Svcs TOTAL _Z 'rEk_1011 -------- Mai^t'"rmurdls X ldg-may D�en Park 'supplies Ka Mint-Paul Grow Park -June !'faint -Heritage Prk-Jsne, M.3int-maple Hill-iLne Maar,+-Peterscr; Prk-•vfane ;faint -titan P;eaga s- Eu3,s a laint`Btarshine Prk-June Maint-S;-!mitridge- June A. -V-1 Maim-" !icr4nPrk Maint-Sycamore Cyn -June MTAL ' E r'Ep NOF: 07,09 yl6'30 VC 49051 Add=i- hal nt-Pe?'_`rsfin 07/09 06/30 4$6.66/4c;724 Add' l point-Heriraae Prk 07/U-1 9 06130 4&667 Add -"I Maipt-P Grow Par': 07/1:'9 061230 4•`.553 Add'l Maint-Syc Cyn Prk 07/09 06.130 4rti669 Addl M alnt-A - Reac!E 07/09 Oh/��t3 46 J2 Add'1 Plaint-5tarshine 07109 06/30 437`:-? Add"I Maint-Maple Hall 07109 016130 58124 iiebri=-nmol-Peter'snPrk ';,-m. r� DUE VEP=/=,R--------) 0709 06 f�iS`1 ! t 07109 06/30 neimb-LeagICCC A�'3CAOCorifs TOTAL DUE VENDER --------} 3.1-0 16,52 h1u.00 Cl71.1. J0` 1.100.t�3 '5' y Cy 91130, jft 50130.00 F r.•} r, 1, 6:or. Citi 4£:.11 55.:_-3 ?99.1:0 c85.62 L;?O.00 1,651.26 Cp.90, 476.09 Austin Faust Assoc 3nc. AustinPaus 001`455c -S? "� 52 60/7156 01/5415 07109 1:6130 1543 TrfcStdy 01chIIiists-May R TOTAL DUE 'VENTER --------' 4,110.00 D AT -r ?;ATE HE; . li:1 T 5'22722'-21:22 tf 1 _ R' i T - _ . VEINOOR INAME VENDOR 10. ACCOUNT F^:O,l.TX-N0 BATCH PG" �� Cp.Ts�=Y/�i!c T�i.� � F�=;'n. Ll i!!?4e LiY_ . 11Y' F�L 1# !ON hfinn'S}T enchmark Publishing °enc`smark 0"01-4096-1110 38 007158 01/5741 n-QI-40'36-22115 15 K0715B 0i14740 Dendib, Khalil E=rdibK 001-4090-2210 106 80715B Bill's Lack & Safe BillsLcck «y�-431t3'21J 1::;071. � 06/48Z? 0'J1-4:-31- 1x1 3�?715B 05f46'z Bryan A. 5tirrat & Assc llryanStirr 001-4510-5222 320 03715U 01143613 u01-4551-5223 263 60715G 01/5481 CLUJT Cambo`s 'Welding Dill - 4 0 9 5 - 4CY00 ��an7l C;�n{fr:s bill -4,50-4::00 CLC -JT Cami�s6�eld i.'a a� 7150 ! 1 j"�l.�6 Carol inn i 75 F715C 01/4671 58 80715C 0374671 Charlies Sandwich Shop Gharlies .01-4210--2325 23 3137I5B 13/4590 Chebat, Flh.alil 2376 001-3474 42 8223715E 07/0'3 06/:30 000222495 Pri9-Ec341DvIp5uide 1,132.50 72209 06;`30 ;u�224`35 7 =!dEconDvlp �JRsrce0dilJE- 9v, 700.G TOTAL ?SLE VENDOR --------y 4,332.513 07/39 06/30 Reit-Ode To DBar-Expense 1,-126.43 T13TAL DUE VE7-@'OR --------1 1;:326.48 07/09 061/30 106918 ren Park Supplies 104.16 07/09 06'30 1122383 Re-Key-ScvCynPrkPrtbl 167,41 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------, 21. x5, 07.108 08,30 98996 Ensr Irs actn "c5 -s1169 75,03 07/09 06/30 '3iu1 ?Lan Check Svcs-BentiyWay 60.35 TOTAL DUE VENL!LR-------- 1:3.`_:. 13 07,11092016!30 �.. . 2 iS 6 TOTS RREPAID AM014T ----; 12. 0 TOTAL OLE VENLat - -------} 0.__ 0�1,i4 _fh�IF3� :>leldg;v,=-!?dei.}YL'�ar G_dt,�� TOOTA " OLE VENDOR --------i 260.00 07/09 0,6/:30 DBCCQ703 Dints 6/171Mtg-Ci+.yCnc: 2140. Xi j ..J7 1)6!30 70, P ,. ?1hts-r&R Mtg 51,22 22 .00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------; 460.00 07/09 08/30 010133 Mtg Supplies-6/17Dvlpi©de 3?.93 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 32.93 07109 06/30 21741 Recreation Refund 50.:0 TOTAL WE VENDOR -------- } 50.00 t Citv oF Oiamond 8e� *+* RUNTM V OUCHER RE@ [ S T E R DUE THRU ............. ��-7/15/97 VENDOR NAM[ VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PR0.TX-N'C _________________________________________________________ BATCH PO.LMM0. EMTRY/DUEE M0110E DE�IP�� A M.0J,11T C�RT` a"'t, Yvonne 2378 X11'3478 302 80715F 07/09 06/30 22127 Recreation Refund 54. GO TOTAL �� VEN8OR ----> 54.00 China Hills Ford ChHillFm� 001'4310-61010 13 c"07,158 01/3860 07/09 O6:0 1833118 Bed Liner-FordPickUp-PM TOTAL DUE VENDOR --''--> 837.96 Chokshi, Ketan 2380 00l'3478 Z9 8*715F 07/09 06/W 2211O Recreatjon Refund 155.00 TOTAL DUE VENB0{ -----> 155.O0 Coffee Smith CoffeeSmit O01'��0'2325 116 80715B 01/4555 07/09 06/30 4380 MtO 3upplies-June 97 S7.Y0 �TAL DUE VENDOR '----' > 37.90 Conrad & AssociatEs amrad OV1'4��-4O1O 19 807158 O1/5�0 OT�� O6/30 97-5�85 AuditorEvalutn'NwFinSystm 7230. 0-0 C�1-4��-4010 21 807i58 01/5575A V7�� V6/30 Y7-��86 AodtSvcs-QtrlyP-vw'3,rdBill A7000 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 4,7 C�.00 Corona CLay CorcmaClay 001-4319-2210 46 807158 011/!M26 O7/09 06/80 488/489 Ballfieldmaiot-Petersn 947.19 001-4J�8-221O �2 8O7158 03/5826 O7/OY 06/3O ��/�� Dal \fieldMaint-Sianifitrdge 4YO.59 U01-4331-2210 58 80715B 02/5826 07/09 06/30 488/489 8al1fieldMaint-5vCCvn 498,60 TDTAL DUE VENDO� ----> 1,044.38 0ave Bang Associaies 0O1-4A1O-1�N 95 8071.B 07/09 061241 5974 Plavgrod Rplcmnt Parts 49.54 TQTAL D31E VENDOR ------> 49.54 Day & Night CtVy Center Day&Night O01-4210-210 28 80715C 01/4659 07/0 06/20 0394 Gen Photocopy Svcs 73.43 C01 42��'2110 3O 80715C 01/4659 07/09 06/30 442 413.30 TOTAL DU[ VENDQR -------- 486.73 Dekra\ite Dekralite � 001-4350-5305 � 98 80715C 01/5923 O7/09 06/:30 97138 Cancert lo Prk-Banners 1,442.25 RUN , I'VE: Q8!35 .'.f 1 :'^" : '�,' i = u R~E j j .Y - fI A i -6E THRU..............07'i~ i`37 VENDOR WEE VENDOR ID.. ACCODUNT PROJ.TX-NC} BATCH MLINEP40, ENT1--YU JE 1NV,1;TCE I.K-RIPTTin' AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dewan Lundin & Assoc, newan � 1 I� 1249 2 :7 5C01/5-1-3 15-1- . i54'.-1 -411 r?�? 1' L �_1:.1_�i.l1 i+J?.:v Diaio-und Bar Automotive DIB"'utd1rt3 601-4210-2200 14 8117150 01/52''1 Diamond Ear Redevelopment DBarR17A Wi-I -1- �a K171`10 Diana Cho i& D: anachz 125-4215-4000 21 667150 0114M Direct COnnectiGn Direc1Conn f1G J 80715C' 01,4650 DivsrSiFied Di e'rsPira 112-455•=-552'; 51 30715C (31%59,;' 53 0,0715C 0114576 • L : � � Jvi `:press Pipe A531api r Exprsssrip 115-4515-1200 5 80715A 01/59:35 ederal Express Corp. FedExpress 00!-M90-21120+ 54 307150 Finnerty, ;nnette FinnertyA 001-4:G-4100 42, 80715E C,7/f.' }i.. =0 LEE -1011-1 Des n��1=s'�YBra�ir"r/ ,alomi no 5-1--T50.005-1--T50.000 MAL DUE VENDOR -------- i 5, 350, 00 07/09 06130 T1re5-Plnq Trick 72 TOTAL D!E VENDOR --------) 1Z8.82 07;0;9 Ohr30dJz,,e-7;'1` Expenditures 44,547,77 !TOTAL DUE VEAI----------1 44,547.77 07/1,;Q 1)i /33 CDBS Prof SVCS-,6ji:e 414.00 MTAL ME VENDOR --------? 416.00 1)71%,9 0,c r 94-- •_.; M c. t_ + aili uv:.�--uFir�erW 6r � 2 iJi.�t TOTAL DUE VEN_1DR-------- 201.62 1019 ,� .7 :.. 0, ,.a i S -s: 1-1 ,a Lab�vc i e' 15 TOTAL DUE VENDO.,-------? iD, 07,'09 06/30 Meta19heJvingMatrial5-PW 100.til 0, T.if L PREri'112 AMOUNT ----} 11:0.00 TOTAL DWYE `iENDOR--------! 0.Gur 07/09 06/30 418181J144 Express Mail Svcs 272.173 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------7 272.73 07/09, 0�:3i ??" , 1'?t?.00 TDTAL DUE VENDOR --------? 120-00 C PREPAID L - ------------------ r f i0 f 97 000603447 Fi-estcne Stores F -mg, Franklin 00`1-4210-410, F i rest c^,r=_ 124 @0715C 011-765 Fon-gF 50 813715E Foothill Transit FeothillTr 112-4553-5,533 :118 0li1 2)115116 1i2-45•a53,�-55a53 5 1''21'? tC 112-455_-3-5535 :2107150 'u2/58f,6 79-Frtedr-ich an,., ksoe v 9 0{ i-45121°-5 217 '304 1007150 01,523 332, , l-4 v,?.� -4000 '• 13107i5c 011153,78 13"-4.59-4000 1 : ' 021534 LU 1117- 0000 1 801-11151C, 34.5343 KE Cal ifiynia G 001 -4316-2125 13 817cL_n CTE F-alitorn213 {GTE 001-4322-211214 13 10715C CTE CaliForn-a GT` 0021-4040-2125 11 30715C GTE California GTE 11-4331-2125 2_6 00715C 07,N9 /30 62772 95 FrarE`Erak2s-GMCTrc 8x,44 07.`09 {A/30 6_774666 GilcW5-FQ71Cars Mona TOTAL WE VENIDOR--------) 102.50 07/11'''' 06/30 Plny Cc -,DR mt,3-4/10 W.00 LI U, T.s .- ............. ':y'17 TOTAL E YEKDOR --------� .D JA. ' 1lv ff�N VENDOR iii '!E �I ?e'�41ia �"�'.�. -1}. ire-Trr•.�t 5i� sdyPr� ir ?6. r3 07 lcr� 06130 C,—..D,IjNTP.PR( q_A H PO. L T l a i ;?l:', f rDL' 211 ` _ ._ �k ?`s EN V0.1C— c rrC, x 3une-TmsSt{�5 ares 4,67ti.10 TOTAL DJE VDIMIR--------} Fi-estcne Stores F -mg, Franklin 00`1-4210-410, F i rest c^,r=_ 124 @0715C 011-765 Fon-gF 50 813715E Foothill Transit FeothillTr 112-4553-5,533 :118 0li1 2)115116 1i2-45•a53,�-55a53 5 1''21'? tC 112-455_-3-5535 :2107150 'u2/58f,6 79-Frtedr-ich an,., ksoe v 9 0{ i-45121°-5 217 '304 1007150 01,523 332, , l-4 v,?.� -4000 '• 13107i5c 011153,78 13"-4.59-4000 1 : ' 021534 LU 1117- 0000 1 801-11151C, 34.5343 KE Cal ifiynia G 001 -4316-2125 13 817cL_n CTE F-alitorn213 {GTE 001-4322-211214 13 10715C CTE CaliForn-a GT` 0021-4040-2125 11 30715C GTE California GTE 11-4331-2125 2_6 00715C 07,N9 /30 62772 95 FrarE`Erak2s-GMCTrc 8x,44 07.`09 {A/30 6_774666 GilcW5-FQ71Cars 14.06. TOTAL WE VENIDOR--------) 102.50 07/11'''' 06/30 Plny Cc -,DR mt,3-4/10 W.00 TOTAL E YEKDOR --------� .D JA. ' 1lv 0- 00",10 09 ire-Trr•.�t 5i� sdyPr� ir ?6. r3 07 lcr� 06130 .3% Commission 4]7M9 '06/30 7046 3une-TmsSt{�5 ares 4,67ti.10 TOTAL DJE VDIMIR--------} 5,700.69 07/09 06/30 ?706-0'1 Ergr-lnspectr a.'C_-Ma 11.2'5 07% x:36;30 `y706-06 LanSscpe0,vcs-Dist#38-Ma:r `328.21 -r 11"? 06,130 (� j 7l�L t° �le1'J—''.t6 �( Lna�cce6vcs-Dist#ti�v-lla�a r�ie�e� 1 421 07"09 {x6130 ?{36-06 LandIs_apaSvcs#41- a3` 92S.E1 07/09 1,61Q0 Gen F'hne Svcs -Maple Hill 42.7. T lT L DUE VENDOR --------1 07/0 06130 Uer Thr=e svcs-Ron Reagan 4<.71 TOTAL DDE VEP- --------} 42.71 07/09 06/30 Gen =nne Evcs-Modem Line 48.93 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------3 46.",33 07;!3a r.6,/ti0 Gan'ne Stcs-SycCvnF-k 98._°0 TOTAL DUE VSNDOR--------3 50,60 �r ON TIDE: `�_:35 ';'7 i0 ` v` _L C H R n E.,6 WRnI u'ENELDR tiNhiE u. ACL i;rT F'R17_!.T: -Nil Er T H PO.04E/NO. r- M, .CLE 2N' ' ' E iE ' i ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GTE _aliFcrnia G!= TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- j1-4: 1-21''9 3 7 '1:17; c- 333 GTE Calitornia GTE Gen Phne Svcs aycC{nPrl: 001-4314-2125 2-3! 80715C ,i71! 0 ,'3o GTE California GTE ,-IAL DUE VDINDOR-------- i 001-43.31-2125 38 807150 0T<07 06/30 GTE CaiiF,--rnia GTE 24. G_ (101-4313-2125 16 _: 7' 5C ,, , to 61`3<0 GTE CaliFcrlria CTE TOTAL ;D LE VP24Dai --------r1''2,1, 118-409-8-2125 14 80715C 07/0 0 1K -i Goldenberg, .� ` : ve ch l '3o11end2rg ,f a-, y. A'] S((:: YL11 - 1v'v' 4f 20-715E 1j71 ticj 11{ '3-) HTE -PF" -inc. HIE-PFSTnc 001-4350-1200 177 80715D 1`1 j'`k": 9 07/051 00"1`30 .3802 Hall & Foreman HaliVorem 001-4510-52127 310 807151 01=4 0-7 09 1)6 j!,O 34365 001-4510-5227 303 })?151i 01/5596 071/09 06/10 .143,17 6 ��,t-4510'522 306 8071-9 0115'84 07/09 06/o0 34371 Han, Myuna 2372 001-3474 34 80715F 07/09 06/34 21724 Gep Phne -C:: I. ?2 - TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- -33 Gen Phne 7VC5- rt;CCfTi t X6,60 TOTAL DUE VENT --------? Eb,c�7 Gen Phne Svcs aycC{nPrl: 54.45 TDT4L DILE VENDOR ------- , 54.45 Sen Phne Svcs-Hrt - Pr'.f 5.4.45 ,-IAL DUE VDINDOR-------- i 54.45 Gen Phne Svc4-88-s Mc-dum 84, i4 + - TOTAL wl_E `_.<: � :�,3? -------- n 84.444 24. - RegistratnReceipts-Rec 19'=.12 TOTAL ;D LE VP24Dai --------r1''2,1, .:.: Cil a?`:nspect!?Svcs-T4i'50 2,418-84 Gv EnDr-lnsperhSvcs 90.35 Encr-1nspectnsvcs-Stp1's `,0°i TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1 2,794,19 Recreation Refund 5tl,00 TOTAL DLE VE,"IZOR-------- 50.00 TOT,k DUE VE@OR--------] `di,00 � Hligh, Poirt Graphics ray Hightu oint 0535070057 V DLECH - R RES 1 8 T EnR 07/09 06/30 7 pas E PrePressSycss-Bue-ards 21.65 ME ERU...........- 37 ,5,"_7 8071,521 01/537 /� VENDOR i� 519.40 gCCIUIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PROj.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/W. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AM0U'NT DATE CHECK Heimi&,,, Erwin 2?69 r-' -4350-4100 MIAP4 37 030715F 07/E09 06/30 21815 Recreation Refund 5100 120.00 TOT,k DUE VE@OR--------] `di,00 � Hligh, Poirt Graphics ray Hightu oint 001-4095-2111 66 007150 01/5837 07/09 06/30 59095 PrePressSycss-Bue-ards 21.65 j1,11-41-05-2111 64 8071,521 01/537 07f,rr9 06/30 59193 Pra'Press S.cs-5G=lRsri=0ue 519.40 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------; .541.25 Halder: Karen HeldwK. r-' -4350-4100 45 80715E 37!49 01/30 PSR Cammrtgs-5/22-5/12,26 120.00 OPAL DUE VENDOR --------; 120.00 Huff, Dara 23_ap. 001-3478 3010 81,1715F 07109n /c l t 5 Pscrea ion Refund 8i 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 85.C* Huff, Robert u rg 0 0 1 - 4i) 9 0 - 2 i �z5 105 80; i _:ii 07/09 ,, 0. a 0/.:830 Reimh-CellPhreSvcs 14X TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------? '4.14 Huis4h Family Fun Center Huisffamil 17, 30715D 0115861 0=109 U./30 1050 Encir-*aVti3mp 6,'.8 's,; TOTAL DUE VEiIDOR------_-; 320. GO Huls. d. Michael Hu1s'9ike 115-4515-5500 40 W717D 01/4796A 07/09 06/30 dbgt075-97 IntegrtdNsteMgmtS'Ycs-May 5-722.50 15-4515-5500 42 S0715D 01/4796A. 07/09 06!30 s,40705-97 IntegrtdWst.eMgmtSvcs-.4ay 3.810.00 TOTAL DUE 'VENOOR--------? 9,5'�?.50 ;s-�dr.ascape Hydrascope OQI-4 13-:'.-710 61 807150 02/5507B 07/0 06/30 1401576 Parr Supplies-Hrtge Priv 14=.14 TOTAL DUE VE, OR ------- , 146.14 Image 1V Systems Inc. image46ys 00 i - 409LI - 21200 126 80715D 01/4555 07/09 06;36k:uni.z � Maim Svcs -Ma', so 1L..Ot. 001-4090-22A 125 8071.5D 0114559 07/09 06/30 Konica Copy Charges 55.81 TOTAL DUE VE.ND�OR--------} 214.81 � � C', City of Jamond �� TIME' 08�35 �y0�9 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAEE 8 UE T�U...... ....... O7/15�7 VENDOR WE VENDOR 0. mCCOUm PROU.TX'NO BATCH PILINE/NO. --------------------------------------------------------'-------'-- �����N�I� DESICRlPTION Inland Valley D\y Du}letn IVD3 �1���5 �� �� ��1� O��14 �� �� �-Ti�����-�� 81.� TOTAL DiLE VENDOR -----') 81.9O Jamisom, Deborah 2377 001-3474 2980717 07/09 0-6136 21736 Recreation Refund �.� TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----} 47.00 Judicial Data Systems JudDataSys 001-4411-5405 2880715D 0/,,Y� t, /�May'PrkQCites 1319.12 001-4-411-5405 29 80715D 07/9 06/3* May-pevipwProcessing 22^00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR —'--''> 161.l2 eim, Jenny 237Y 887l5F 0/",9 06,12_0 21566 Recreation Refund 20,00 TOTAL FLUE VENDOR ----> 2O.00 KieinFe}'er Kleinfoldr 950-4310-6415024,?-,�Q 8�� 01�� 07,109 53'_L7,3 CI���l��r�'� �W,� TPTAL DUE VENDOR -----> L.A. County-8eriff'5 Dlep LACSheriff 001-4411-5404 18 8V7�50 07/09 N613V 85197 5,26O.83 TOTAL DIIJE V0,1DOR ----> 5,268 83 L.A.Coun y ��\ic Norks LA, Pu�Wk 001 -451V -522l 3 '009150 01/5445 07/09 06/30 027 LftTroSignI'DB/P hf-May 1,�9.34 001-41110-5530 20' 8-0715D 01/4574 07/09 06� �� �n����s'�r/May 813.30 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----> 2.582.64 L.A.County Public Works LAC9ubWk 001-4558'5510 26 80715D 01/4553^ 07/VY 06/30 97V0V0V6928 Tree Water Svrs'�� 2,S37.59 001'4"3 1'5300 70807155D 0214-753 009�00 9700001,17115 Sump Pump Maint'May TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- —''- LA LA Cellular Telephone LADellular 001'4090-2125 106 807150 07/09 06/3uO Cellular, Svcs -Gen 71.00 TOTAL DILE 'ANU0R ----> 71.00 � i a Y r. ' C inn va, Ji c 71, CiSE THF;J. . ........... 07 + � i I �;� NAME I��t 'i `dENT11OF NAME `FNijG; ID. ACCOUNT P t?J.TX-PDQ BATCH PG.LINE C. ENT ;1;j-. INw ICE DE tiRiPTIGM AMC T ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LaBel le -Margin LaBel le€Mla€^ 001-4510-4000 7 G-150 0115974 LaMarre, Kathi 2166 01:31-3476 37 80715= Laverne, City of LaverneCit Vil-4411-5405 vr: C0715D Lee, Sung 2373 001-3474 410 80715F Luis Engraving Inc. LewisE^gra "C.052J.-'3 '8{)7 1GR 011'52031 i-40' 5-2113 64 W715D 01. 15-0 Liu, an X370 Irl �- X14 0 3E71ci LOS A, aeles County MTA LA[MTA 112-4553-5533 120 807158 0115315 c5 c�;�5 �4 807 i . 112-4 3-..: 1�: 5f1 €12i.:c 81'1 M&H R8alty Partners li =-_P MSHPr pert 001-4090-2140 66 80715E 01/5964 001-40,90-2210 1€x.3 80715E 021%4 MCG:athlin, Bfant 2568 001-3474 36 80715F 07!09 061 30 °2t9 -R E: gr5vcs-Fi¢idTesf_g 570.00 TOTAL DIE VENDOR ------=-} 570.00 07/09 06/30 21613 Recreation Refund 74,;,0 TOThtL CLE VEtra!? --- ----? 74.?� 07109 06'=0 J,sne-Prkg Cite Hearings 5.€ 0 T+PUi4L DUE ,e-J1DGR--------3 35.00 07f09 06130 219 Recreation Refund 105. CIO TOTAL U'JE VEKNOR--------? i05.00 0709 06130 02557102:41 Eneravg vcs-Tiles 51 .9-S 07,''69 061 ' 30 022 48 _ guvcs-Til Engra� es , 1 7 , ice TOTAL DUE ':ENI'DOR--------i 5' 07/09 06/-10 21094 Recreation F?eE4nd 25.%0 TOTAL DLE VENDOR -------- 3 29-00 07!09 %130 677G827 June-IrisSut.sdyPrvg,rm 310.00 07109 € 6 t30 ''7i c 2 i June -1 rnSSubsdyFares 535.00 TIJTAL DUE `tEND'OR--•------i 845.00 07/09 06/30 Rent -Co �€ SvcsCir-June 1,2"34.%- 07/09 o6/; 'cl CAM-Ci-Ji(in.svcs.tr-June 1,2224.19 TOTAL DUE 4`PdlrsR--------1 2,510.6.9 07109 04!3+0 22134 Recreation Refund 150.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------k 50.00 PREPAID DATE ------------------ tFA1 _ _ _ �I:4 1 -. _� -=J .::5 r �1 _ iJ 1 r ��yy L[Lfc T�' ,4R-` ............. '1`i 5/97 :v E�vi OR � INE Iri'tiifi_f, Au. ACaGUNT PR0j.TX-N0 1ATCH PO.LIMEiWDI. ENTRY15LE 1INYOU ICE 21E5-CitiPT1GN AMOUNIT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mc`lanus, Joseph mcMinust! '931 -4210-4100 49 W715E Mzdina, Raul mv-,inaR 0-)1-4350-411Y) 46 80715E Metrolink Metrolink 112- 45533- 5 533 122 80715E 01/5217 112- 4152-5535 146%715E 02/5 17 Mitchell Pest Control Inc MitchellPe Ell;i 1r i 5 6 '4rY ii-�I�19 o0715E' 01/5-28 'MC -1-4210-2310 i 01-4:=1v-2'31 rf 001, -4415-231%: Mob i l 1? 80715E :36.14660 807f `E n4 i`99f� 14 3- 15E 35:'4 0 07fr,, is r {ft . Ping Comp lit: -6/10€' 6C.._ 10TAL EU'E VEI--------) S0.00 137/0+.9 66/30 P&R Comwiftigs 5/22,bi°12 100.00 Lea= : � u EytiCy,.tble-'vre 11TAL DUE VENDOR --------) 80.00 07/09 06.1130 Jun g-TrnsSibsdyPrgrm 4,490.60 i'.1109 06/330 ojune-TrnsEubsd}'Fares 17,754.4O -23 �a05 TOTAL i;1_'E VENDOR --------) 22.225.00 IV 26551 reeMa nt-C,dC'?,WnCrcl 225.00 80715E TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------'r 225.00 07/'09 06/3' M Faei-FIr� F a3 C[ 2P_ RI.3.67 t18%2f) "L -v Fuel -Pr k:.Re 32 79 .V�j4 06 1X iuel-i7.i" itrl 17: J7 MoonlightP r�.pairr yrs=y-.;iry , '. F!YL 501E Y�.t41iOR __---! _. -,. 5.;111) 03 Mobile Mod-ular Man,wement focoii14aduI i1 5+-2 t „ C'- `:1 111 i)0-430140 7 l t, t=_.7�.f 1,5+Js5f3 07109 f:t z� 0130 £t 6 4.e Lea= : � u EytiCy,.tble-'vre C 'n 'ICTAL DjE VENEUR--------1 33?.70 vrsan ; Don -23 �a05 00' -3474 80715E 07/09 06/30 X2002 Fecreat ion Refund TOTAL :'WJE .3E }10(x: ----- . -. Sf;,Cf= Moonlight Press MoonlightP 0011 -4090 -ilio ';l 80715£ 01/4500A 07f(,)9 Ci6,� 971-&6- Stationary 8?�,;ies f7.v4 0 1-4C`. i7 -211t! 9v W715E 01/5353 0710'? 06,130 ?7106 City Letterhead 50,E4 TOTAL DUE V INDOI ?-------- } 127.68 Moore Iacofano Goltsman Momelacof 'XI -4096-50910 2 ai171`E 07!+?9 06;30 97-1431-01 Pr rf3wcs5f3-Rd°,1MTwr iiMtg 3,182.81 TUAL SUE VE --------) 3,181.01 j f ^��JP TSlii [._:}� =�c _:-r� {;J =-, 1': J U�.,ri? P.Y,j- 0 I:Li rl`. ..........ss `!:1 1 EZ 7 VF-NDOR N41E VENDOR 10. ACCOUNT PRfCJ 1 TC F�t5 5� jaJ �h n` �,,; T , . i n"` aPMT �.Th-NG BATCH i.l.Li 9LrN . T:.k 1 U—E IN CE DEr�R�l rr -n� .z 0 ui Mule, Gerard 233 001-3414 33 M -1715F New West Signal NewwestSi9 250-4510-x.412 10697 y3 SC`15E 01/5779 O'Cennur, DEbby GcnnerC 01,11-435".1;-4100 44 80715E Oda, Irene C2�371 001 -34 11� 36 8Lf7l,- TO IEE Depot DfflE�.rnJ,� 001-4040-1 220C, 2 I'D "n 715E 8514566A 0'7 r 9 06 i3o 715E 9�).-f45L6A r01-4050-1 0 3 80715E 87/4566>A -01-1�;s.;;-1130A..", 1 2 8015E K/4`6'58 �1 1- l yK)-12110807 r fi'�i: n 23 15 1 _ e r 4-c1v�'�k 0 kl -4C.".0- 1 X11.71 _E '-2/47'6A ,kl 1'4G30-1200 c �k715E 2-`/4v,66A _,�I-4c 1 2",* 44 CRO` 7 1 5E 91 /4566A j01-4090-1 _'C10 122 4 - 111 ita fi7i=�E 1/5947 }} €JlJ1-4€� ✓-1 1k'j '� 807 r�� -q JVI IJC-4,-1-6A 001-41)50- i H)o 27 8071 C, IS/456'6A Payroll Transrer rayrvliTr 75 2.0715A 011/37 06/m 22•MK2E P'ea = I u'{ n Rerkind 50 � 0,0 TOTAL DUE YENDT x: -------- } 5(i,00 07/09 OEI.O 9??ClTrfECntr~ilr€pry-DDRi`d 27v90,7.35 TOTAL IL,'E VENDOR --------) 27,9-;7.,35 07/09 06130 F:µR Cam-mNtgs-5; 2-6/12,26 120.00 TOTAL DUE VE!,FCCR-------- 120.00 07/09 06/30 1567 Pprr Mi 1rlP# R2f rd1 q' f TOTAL 3.1E VENDOR --------} 1';3.00 071109 06, 01 020731.39 SUppiies-CLlx J -Q-3 0'7 r 9 06 i3o 0-2,1103--4179 1-upp l ilk SVCS • r. 4 07109 O ctt: i c: !? 11Jc�7r:,0�� �uYp11= 'F?.riant2 155-. 57 7[1 `�upp 11?`s-a `name l01—a.3 07/09 06/30 0'2115' 22 SLrplies-Ger, 030.yt 102. 62 k7/09 06/010 021158844 applies-Cty:cur,ii 26.- 07/09 =06130 0'211586.58 Supplies-CNar p,i . i i 07/09 Of,1 �3 021158551 Sup lies -Pub Wks 5a' S 07/0? 0631 0 0211:�U 427 Supplies -Cop --ye Paoer 7 4766 0 07ii3`# 06!30 0211'? 82 ;supplies-�CMQr 0 07/09 06/3%) 021189433 S ;plies -Finance X4.51 T ;-.n DUE VENDOR —01- 07/09 06/30 PayrollTransfer-F1.3 c� nr- .]o,�•�l].01s 0 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----1 53,300.00 GTA.L DUE rENDIA---------- iO,r,Y{ Phillips, Darryl 2:6C 001-3474 30 80715F 07/019 06/'3;.- �iJ75 Reereatien Refund 50.400 TOTAL OME VWDOR--------; 50.00 :._tY *i'r. `=31 `171i�.i it>I I� •1 !� _ �.' r. Tn a'ENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PR1?J IX -NG BATCH EN RY"DUE 1NVD-ICE DE:1CPRI P T1,N ga ------------------------ ---1 Pitney Bowes Pitneykwe x!1-40910- O 171080715F: 0115349 Pomona Judicial District PomjudD!ist ,�31-3223 40 80715E Pomona Jnified Schwl PGMVIyschl 250-4510-6411 1402977 14" W715E Prisma 1maging 001-4043,D-4030 Pri ect Sister Pr' sma I mag 54 a0715E 01157166 r _I i :ter 52 30715E 01,'4-601 Renal Dia -mord Bar Cinemia Recall! ar 9350 531 001'�.� �1'-.rL�iG 160 807ff-A tai!s-665 Re; regar, Debra 07101-3474 Repro Graphics 001-4090-2110 2";64 3S' 80.715F ReproGraph 95 307156 GI;'5380 Richards Watson & Gershon, Richardswa 001-Z300-1010 2-25 3171563 001-40'20-4020 ?8 607156 01/4713 001-4020-4021 91 8071563 01/4730 115-4515-4CM 7 807156 001-40,20-4021 9' 207150 01,4730 001-40201-4L.i21 95 8071F-0 01"4730 07/09 06/33 3816-133PtY/J LeaseMailEquip-'lay/June a53. 2-41 TOTAL DUE :EPS? --------i 3`x.,32 07/09 06/ May -Parking ktivity 41710.;10 TOTAL DUE tIEOOM--------} -11'0.00 ;57 /;�6 37V.50 !af€4-€ �a=l.t�y�5e-L, rS_t;iRenMt7 7. 50 '--------} TOTAL DUE VENDM � ...,630 ' 07/09 06,13ll "I 4«I--�EUpgrde-1{f€ti=_IeSystm 1,500.00 TOTAL DUE VEND j?B--------} .,.r00 CD�D'�F'rgrm-S<{`ssa€�1tTrg iC3+;,,,fit TOTAL f.'LEVENDOR --------3 �_ '.OG 07,109 06130 G -r 'Jb. 7� C'; TOTAL REPhi AKOUNT _--; 17C,5F, TOTAL DUE `VENEOR--------} tI,00 07/09 06/30 22076 Recreation Refund T07.A L DUE '''FIND- :------- , 50.00 07/09 05/31 8439 PusDard: mpr ints _3 ) "'.43 ICTAL BLE 'VF -N -%R --------1 57.43 07/09 06/.^;G Legal Svcs -FPL n --W6 50.IN,} 071`09 067130 eQal Svcs-Mav4_? ii. �4 47.109 06,130 Speclal Legal Svcs-LLADS 1,777.35 07/7109 061`30 Legal Svcs -Solid Waste 37.51 0,1/I0 06/30 92418 Special Legal Svcs -IPS 874.40 ',7110 0,6 'V1 P2410Special Legal Svcs -anis 71SO TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 7.2,01"1 ? DA C C,HEmCi... v C G _ E; DO NAPE F'REPAiD Nt-.00ti T cit=�.' -rU SA L,: F'O,L-I�JE;`NO. I sr'I;LUr aW, � ver:€_Slp-rn � U, F,IL 3£:Sy €�eurye `H6 O'C'i1-:14,4 3s : , :;F 077f.9 06i:nO 242 9022 Recreation Refund 50.':x# TOTAL iCE VENDOR -------- `r Row's Internet Business Romes Inter y{7F 01/535-8A .q a.rf 17! / _ , _.25 TOTAL iUE VENDIOR -------- -3-n.45 Romero, aj+rce c_ lli'",34r.J 14 80715F Y'/{'Cl�i 06I Qlefnd'M_trol lnkPass 89.60 TOTAL DUE 'v`END,7R--------s °,? .Lo Pon'-ranzer&;•issoc C.E. Inc r'fc_A 2)57 CO3715S 01/5571 t?'/{J'3 063j 5781 RIdChecking E HC3 4''..R4 001-45.51-522:3 25, 97 «r#7I!F ;`�i 57CA :<. f� s 7:;{i 06 f _'ryT G/�3 X781 JiGln 1 i,ilALk S`r`(:s 11_.(j L-01-45 i-5-_.i� - .1 1 ;P071`R t 1 -571 r7i` ° '6/10 57$i "rr CheckinL c g 1 6. C14 a1-4510-5 2 27 312 SO715F 01;`4';11 07/09 t;6..`;,, 4' S, 4 7-ngr-Insgectn Svcs 112.5 50 #1-451G'.U. 31= Et-:'a7t 5>- 01 i�?i; I+d X74 3ji . , 1 E.-/30 G7. �f3 r_'•._ ns� _:^ . �P Svcs 1C34. 50 0. jiil-TcjJ-52- J'1 6 riis 0 1 0 r:,: 7 09 0t::,.-:_:0 5-1 R`? r` � G��2 Gr ad :�„1 a c S1,.�A 4`!1€� 27 -5.:. f ? G 7': 01/1691 :. s 07/09 ;!?r 3f) 57''� _ _ En4r-InS�.iL�=•=' �•' s 11?.� tv},ii_ LUC 4 ••_______ TOTAL DU VE DOF n. 7 CY'U c;€;-42111-41Cs 4: RC�715F 07/0' 613 Flr;:oi„=-"Itys'� 1U,24 1 '7.Uta Te�TML DUE VENDOR -------- 3 1210. 0 Schad, Lion _haol) 8#7fEE : pip G]4 ! GS- E' ii46 i 4 iAL DUE VEX51OR--------{ - 1l- viELi.� ridrre?i C eCk=i} :11155 01/5930 07/09 0f"1 ;{0 -ray001-4210-4250 Cff[rFrkapkvw 24,00 li- .,. 4 8071;G 01f'5647 (7 Fi-Y_= i('_'. T- n estntMirmtRprt-May 950. CIO TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 1,234.00 S- aigmDawt 122 807150 07/€19 06/34-0 /:.� �- 15,�. � 5ignModifictns-;:•oncertBiir 87,89 TOTAL WE l'B[DOR--------} 37.39 s t _ ! 17�1 a' fi VENDOR i"I't"HE V2NE"OR 1D. ACCOUNT PR0JJX-N'0 6!;7GN PO.L'zNE NC. EN. -MY ICIU TN"f �'RIT`ON AMOUNT.T i^ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sir Peed i 1SirSpeed/ ZJ*11-4i1�:-i111f 3L 9-f l u !l1 �7y1' '17109 € 1/30. ..y.i• , 458 35 , TOTAL DUE VEN--------! 458.35 ` mi't& Fina: a4r 001-4350-1200 80711501u/4E6i 42l 07/09 )6 j'0 6764633 ReCrEEa4 iOn SUpplieS 45.00 I5-4215-1£1 '? 8v115G .1,x44517/0 9 06rf 67:54633 Supplies-SrBi❑ 60.39 TOTAL [SUE VENDOR --------; 105.3: Sundaresar, Ran Sunuers nR 0101-347 4-1 807155 07/09 06/30 37356 Rerurd-Excursn-7%1 4.x4 TaTAL DUE `JENDMR-------- I4.00 Takeshita, Steven '7 5 --4 4 f,: 7 3r 807115F 07/09 06!30 22232 R aN} ` 40 :'n C�. xCn .� f � 111, oij TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------- 105.1£3 The Gas Company ,c."a_a_ 0011-43114-2126 41 8071500 07/09 06j30 uas EslcS-4r4L,e Comm utr 57,114 .OTS !:+E YEtv_:3�8° ____-___} ,4 IIS -40%0-4000 0 18 80715E €31 !4800 07/09 10 :/3 t � C 'M27-, : r to t :,�";ye5;..t"!lc��"rinEYE S-uiiFte 86-0. 60 - TGTAL DUE VENDOR ---------i 86-0.60 T4TIe iOu—I Personnel zvc. �:,�y Time0jut - Q01-354-43i.)O 60 8071 1159-2 _G 0F, �, ; 06 30 07, u9 .rJ ' z=�;=; TmgSvc-GSz.:rstry-e, �• cj_. 111-i.. 18x,.1/8 :0 -4040.-4000 77 4.:158 GI;S,'b2 U7f.�°3 06t30 1f 3 T�.,Z'R�_prst-6/1' -« 200. c0 TOTyL OLE 'VENEUR --------i =.sir 71 ve, Stever TtreS 000-43. io-41.0 47 80715E 07/09 %../3C- rn en , bll.M 4 TOTAL DUE ' E' ;?Fi--------i 801.:W? i'anSon, Gerard VanSanG 001-3472 35 SK7156 0/09 €:6/311, Recreation -Pefund 11,010 TOTAL U 'JE;,EGR--------} 110.0'0 jJE u ---'--- . Dzamun� 8ar *** TIME� O8'35 ;,7 Ii V O Ij C H DUE 7HR0...........K7/15�7 VEIN'OR NAME VEMDOR lD. occuuw/ PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LIE/0. ENTRY/DJ I�ICE DESCR7PTION ` | -----------------------------------------_--__ Vance 'Corporation. Vancep-crp 250-4510-6411 103�?7 145 8071550 011/557,81 Wang, Fannie -48115 Fargo Bank 001'4030'2310 o01'4V3O-2325 001-4030-2330 �P-ils Farm Bank Wells Cargo8ank Wells Fargo Bank Wells Fargo Bank 001-4010-233O ��41 80715F WellsFar o 15 80715A 43 80,7154 335 80 7 15A WellsFarDo 74 80715 W811sFargo � 80715A �Le sFaro 890�1� WeilsFaruo 76813715A 31 8015A U7/09 06/30 ��?�/007/09 06/30 0714,15 0,6130 07/09 06/�301 07/09 06 — 07/09 06120 Wells Fargo Bank WellsFargo 001'4010-1200 35 80-715A �(� 06�XI-4010-23-30 77 W715A 071/09 0,6/30 —GE t5 �IUNT DAT7 --------------- °___—___—_' �,-�r-Retab-Strlmprvvit TDTAL DUE VENDOR ----> 8V,855.46 Recreation Refund 5V.O0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----> 5O,00 Fuel'Cmgr 63,37 )6/3,01137 00C)CI-Q-344159 �fqr MtSs-MaY/Jmne 236.74 )6/30/97 D0000334459 CCCA Coof'Cmgr-5/17-18 63Y.82 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---> TDrfL DUE VENO8R --- --> 0.00 CCCA Conf-Harmuny'5/18 65.49 '00N"'.84458 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---} 65.4Y TOTAL DUE VE@�� ----> O.0O Cc*CA Comf'5/18'Ansari 28.4Y O�)0V3446O TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ' —> 28.4Y TOTAL DUE VENDOR '----'--> O.O0 Mtgs w/Staff'HufF 56.24 0VOV�}4461 TDTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --- 56.24 T0TAL � YENDOR ''----> DUE 0.O0 CCCA Cocf'5/18-Herrera 30.180V0OC34462 l�C Con f'5/21-22'Herrera 296.8O�0034 .62 TOTAL PREPAID AM0LI-NT -'''> 326.98 TOTAL DUE VB0XOP ''-'----> O.D0 �fic��ip��� 166-59�� O�034463 CCCA Conf-5/18-Wermer 103.69 0 /30/97 X00034468 iOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --'} 275.28 TOTAL DM VENDOR ----> 0100 | R(o�j T1M ohc-1 e i E s __. 0 C H E 4 ,E _ 1 r. TF5,PJ........... VENUO; NAME VENDOR IU. r.rIn x ACNCUNT PROJ.TX-€ D, BIA C€'. RC iNE; i1). E` T� 'LCL I�d�'_ICE rT=T1pIPT°0, Ar.G _ - ���.s= , iiJ d ; T ., .. :moi �;.r= -- _ ----- 4WeSll Coast A.'LLor1c4- Inc. - f4:.F'Ir iior )1'"r5 -55f) 6,071 1 01/4"! Western gift Wp-sterrGif 1 5-4215-12'rX Si)119/ 75 E,'C1715G 01,W90 Wild Rivers (a01 -4u'5:)-5310 Yosemite lw-arer5 001-4314-2130 00 1-43350- 12TIO n}1-4311}-� 1:3 t 001-4314-1Cu0 Ziaei, Huss 001 -?474 WildRivers 17'2 807150 0115862 Y osmWater 152' 507150 01; 4640 I°`30 3071 C `„4 d� i 5 s lix.i -ham 150 80715G 01/441 63 30715G 021'4641 _381 :1 -3C.i 07/0'? :°F 10 12306 Tree00 TOTAL �' JE VENDOR -------- } ;;� , 00 C,71109 0,7109 (16130 L b1t 74 t� G1'i7�B;=} ^` I �e 4i4rg^IH 13.i`r TOTAL DUE VENEOR--------} 07,'0? 06/30 2459 EMIrs-Lay Caxp-6/25 :5 iii,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 1500 00 07/0-9 16/30. MaV".•_ .'.:4j l 1 tai_i 61 t i'F' 071')9 Mav032645 SQ--p'ies-SyCti`r'gPrk 4:'.710 :, . t�: 061:30 1iay0353292 Er4i�R ' r�tu�`fik-June 7,00 0111"'.39 1QVV J0 -%110Jv$2'.3Iles- rtg �'r.. 4 '� TOTAL DUE Ya-ZiI:4--------k +ri t X37 1,, OE - -.•,4.v, R : - TOTAL DUE YEN"MR --------) TOTAL PREPAID- -----------? -5 -23, TOTAL DUE ---------------i 2?3 635, 7 ____----_--- ..vt . Uiamond 8ar RUIN TIME35SDlO/97 VOUCHER REGlSTER FUND SU.MMA In. Y REPORT DUE THRU............. O7/15�7 OISDURSE G/l -JE WDl POST @JE HAS POSTEDTRANSACT!�6 '~ FUND _____________________________________________________ TOTAL IRECT DPAY REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE ___E�PENSE_ *}1 General Fund 174,677.75 98,397.77 2,012.0o 747267.9-8 139 LLAD #V Fund 7.f)-'Tj.33 7,0355.33 250 C.I.P. Fund 1t4,4:3 2.21 114,4312.21 ���M�� ��'� 8�.� 112 Prop A -Transit F 39,��.21 89.60 39,64O.61 115 Int Waste �gmt P Y,�D.80 9,60.00 {38 #38LLAD � Fund �B.81 7�'81 141 LLAD 441 Fuod 928.81 118 Air Quality imp 1,267.99 ',267.99 TOTAL------' ------------ ------------ ______ __________ _________ ________ 11 ` U C 4 _ h `f E�0^1'� LUE I HR Ll ............. 07: _ e iEM OLR NAME VENDW. ACC 12q1T P 0J.TX-PG BATCH p�r TSS �f�,� �••;!T p,"r "r Fc: l� PC. iJ. �ItE1i9L•. E FT/DUE I:jv:Ji C' DE;;;.,R!,. Tl�;X H3tiiL'21T------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A 3f�.7f L —AA -400Q -2 ' L3Ji.,N Vlic) tt {17/09 07i1� AnnudlLonf-�el5on ; r TOTAL DUE Vt`;n,,,R -------- 34 �i AMTRAK AMTPi;K lig <<)—`3 ^-.f7, 07/:.," 07/15: TrnsV0a CmpEx:urs-7/3 72.110 0 TOTAL PREPAID AMMNT ----? 72.W TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------} 0.00 ?arias, Edward 'Bar i -s 0I3 ...i-.1110 �� 13021 :i :��-iJv� + �s^1- 16 8 , ��A 0-1119 07115 SecZep-refund-HrtgK 1 ':<<,1 .00 01-v 20 1 8071`A y)7 /i9 07;'1v HQritdL]t�Far-RentalChr�s 47.50- TOTAL DUE VE1111DO--------} 152.50 Berry, Da7id rprrvD 001-2300-1010 2, 8,07150 nllr,q 0711=:00 TuTAL DUE VENIDGR------- 2100. 00 •C,• jJ�`G-.J 'ins '_il�ti ,•`i �j ;j1 r.JG=#i4 C�,' 09 07/15 Bair -d -Car: inPrk-;/h :1;',1011 ISTAL DUE VEINDOR--------} 000.00 iat^IE i.—n F ss_:_ c. , ic';ael Branman t _2M_ 1-01n Jrv9 07/15 0597J -:5 4 Prof S'•cs-FFL Y eti E 373 00,1-a 0 -:011 2 ''8071, 5D 07/09 07•'15 '=R7-_`:65 Prof Svcs -E'ER "6-1 v� 1-1y ?#J-101 17 80715B 07/.9 07/15 05Q -2,866 FT--,FSecs-FFt ,6.67.a3 .00-1011 3 E1715B 07,'01 07115 0597-'"867 Prof Svcs-FER ?3-03 699.16 TO" AL DUE VENDOR --------J 5,=81.97 Cd41. rrEia C3ntract CCr..A `01-4COLO -.?15 3 D0715C 071/0-9 07/15 f�18 Annual Dues TOTAL DUE :%ENDOR -------`r ?r (11,00. C0 I C,Qrri liter Applied Systems CA; 3 81-11-15A 0115?82 07/09 07/15 970)406 Fin-Co€€rptrSyelaint -July M1.€ 0 TOTAL M VENDOR --------) 832.00 Converse Consultants ConverseCo OM -2300-1012 ~ 1 R*715A 07/00 07115 .331654 GeoTchRvw-May-ENv,6-165 80.`0 LI,I- J1?f3-iV.. 2 2 E�0715A 07/09 07'/15 M654 GeoichRyw-clay-EN96-165 240.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 626.50 ;+.lt TIMIZ: fl:Iitlr 7 'l Yi D E i T - DUE 4r'! 1.... . .. , ... 4? ACCOUNT .TX -NO BATICH PO.LINEiNG. E.ITRI:/DOE INIVO.ICE DESCRIPTION AM;/WT FATE .ir"LECk. DoubleTree ''Hotel 001-4414`2:324 Evergreen School 441-2300-1,Xz' Do utalTreeH 2 0107150 rvergre;PS 4 807158 F&F1 Federal Credit Union F�ACredttU 01-2110-1412 1 80715A f.sal,ss � Son, Joe A. Oonsalves 42211-4010-4000 3 0471518 0115914 5914 !Tal l & --Sr eman Pal ! &F:Srem .t)1-f3r -1[12 9 K,7151 r n;;715„ .`�01-2.?ri4-11)12 � �._,i3 Hersh, Dennis Herrs'D } i.�1 ��nFlil 2 Lrs0 86 n07 i r_ :.0;5D 001 Charles NeaittW or, i -,>>v -i010 22 $47150 Inland Valley lily Bullets I`RIB i-1010 19 8475 "11 `2Yt1Cx-1014 20 337150 001-1304-1014 15 S471`B Intl Council of Shop; ina ICSC 001-4036-2141 J 5071-B 01;6010 07/09 47ii5 LeneAccom-71222-26-A,nsari 47101.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i 470.80 07/09 47/15 34450 SecrtyDapstRfnd-Prt:Rnt1 50.04) i O T AL r'UE VENDOR -------- t 51.00 Y,7t,,3 47/15 PP14-Cr Onion. Reductions 3,274.75 °l15/W u344b4 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----) 3,274.75 TOTAL DUE 'VEtdsOR-------- i 4.44 =Y?;r^ 07115 ieLslati /FSS cs-July 3ON). �0 Tgfik DUE VENDOR -------- i :3, C'mi. rxt 0,1/09 ()7135 034141 Pref Svcs -EN 95-140 1,4a5,0r1 (�:?i�wt1 (5'./225"3 Pref SYCS" "-84 "`9.h7 TOTAL WE led OR --------i 1,$44.67 47/49 4(/15 .7eLr LvZ'PstReTund-ReagaiPk 51. GO TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --- 0.0 TOTAL DOE VENDOR * 471109 47/15 SEAATAC Mtgs--Y5/8-6j'S 2._! .t�0 TOTAL DUE VENT -OR --------i 2€.1.44 47/ 47ti l {3f 2550t .� 4?s Legal = `FPL -:!7-421 54.1° i 07/,09 41/15 2501496 Legal Ad-FPL=?7-,?18 54.11 47,109 47/15 250221631 Legal Fid -FPL 97-9 94,68 TOTAL 222211E JBDOR--------i 190.91 071t7'? 47!15 EzhihtnSpceP.nt-97ICS,--Ccnf 1,964.44 I TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i 1,960.w *** City of D�anont Bar �N TI��� DUE THpU.....,..'^'.0 7Y\5/97 VENIJ10RN PIM. E ACCOUNT PQ,'Q,-J'.TX-NO BATCH RO.L�/t'C. BN RUDUE INVOICE M C U NT __________________________________________________________ <rvine IMAX IrvineIMAY LA ChildrensMusEum LAChildNus 0001-441-350-53310 16 -W715A LACtyReoistmrRecorder LACRecordr Z,Ioo-1 C-2 4 0.07151 Leighton md &syociates Le-Ighton 3 -15B MaJid, Abdul ;u� %81-230V-1�2 20 01 0 715B Marr�tt Desert Sprirgs MarriottPS IX 3 xl-403' -2-330 10 01.13715C Assoc inc Meverrzhad 5 807115B -1012 FERS Health Benefits RSZSHealth 001-2110'104)8 1 W7115A 10-W03 28O -715A 07.11119 071-15 0771�9 077/15 07/09 07/15 1397 �J,�/� 0710Y07/10 0711011- 07/115 071059 071/15 2540 O7/090.115 07/0Q 07/15 �/��17/15 JI 5 O000034457 TOTAL PREPAID AMUUNT --) 215.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----> 0.00 Dav Camp Excurs-7/3 6O.0O 00OOV3445� TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ''--> 60.O8 TOTAL GLEE YENDDR ----'> 0. CIO RecnrdatnFee-EN 96-164 54. 00 TOTAL DILE VENDOR ---'') 54. 00 hRyw-EN 96-167 100 00 TQTAL n1jE VEMQOR ----'> 10V.03 RefuodSec��'HrtgPk �.0.00 Rental 47.5V' TOTAL DUE- VENDOR ''---> 152.50 AccomlCSCCon��gr-9/24�� 72.25 TOTAL 311-1E. VB-IDOR -------- 572.25 prkgStuddy R-prt-ENY6-10 4550.60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -''-'—'> 4 Y).O0 July -Health Ins Prems 10,363.88 0 /15/97 00000J4453 ,kme-flealth Ino Retro 14J.73 0 /15/97 N)O0U3445� July Admin Re 56.29 0 /i5/97 0000V3.4453 � TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --} 10,573,90 TOT.k DUE ;END03 --'----> ' *** City of Oiamond Dar o*� 4U�� 1� 0�TIM: 08'13W0/97 VDUCHER REGISTER PAGE 4 DUE TRI ..........V71517 VEN�QB NAM[ VENDOR 11* * PREPAID* * oCMUINT PRjrj.TX~NOBATCH PO.LNE/,KLO. ENTRYiajE INVOICE EE SCRIP TIOW ANOUN 'ATE C�ECK —__—__—__________________—_—___________________---____—_______''^_' Phwe Pak %weaurk 00�'43505310 18 80715A 01/5867 07�1,4 07/15 D4CampEzcws-7/2/97 294.00 15!97 0000834454 TOTAL FREPAID AMQW --> 294.00 TO�� DUE VENDOR -----> 0.00 Public Effml Retirement PERS OV1'2110~{008, 1 80715A 07N9 07/15 PP13^Retire 1�omtrib'Enple 3,6525.12 /15/97 O00003445l 00\-2l\O'1NX)@ 2 P30715A 07M9 07n5 PP13'Retire C—omtrib-Emplr 3,274,1.08 0 /15/97 0000034451 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --> 6.931.20 TOTAL DUE VEvDOR -------- 0.00 RL Foley & Associates 8LFoley O01'2300-1010 16 80715B 07/09 07/15 0B -10O Analysis FPL 97-22 TWO TOTAL DUE VEN11,0R —'---> 350.00 Raval, Ruchika RavalR 001 -2300- 1002 9 80715B 07/09 C-7/15 -3,$181 REcreation. Refi�pd TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- ---Rivera, Rivera,Carmen RiveraC 001-23,00-1002 780715B C -7/G? 07/15 34034 200,Jo TOTAL DUE VENDO� ----- 0O Rogan, Alicia RogaoA 001'23OO-1002 22 80715B 07193 07/15 2C. 0.00 00-1-362Cr 3 80715B O7/VY CW RemtalChgs'HeritagpPk 53.75 - TOTAL DUE VENDQR ----} 146.25 ?RooKramzer&Assoo C.E. Inc RVA 0O1 -2300-1O12 6 88715B 07/09 07/15 5782 mdralogyRvw-EN 96-159 276.50 0O1-2,*0-1012 7 807158 07/09 07/15 5783 Hydrolog-&vw-EN 96'160 54',. 00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- ' ''—wosas, Rosas,Helen 031-230A-1002 8 8O715B 0709 07/15 37079 8efmd-ScrtyQSt'wtgePrk 50.00 - TOTAL DUE VENOM ---'-} 50.00 Sam O,abriel Vly Tribune SO'7ribuoo 001-2300-1010 25 80715C 07/09 07/15 05534 Legal Ad -FPL 97'20 1O5.12 301-23*0'1010 23 00715C 07/09 V7/15 07567 Legal Ad -FPL 96-003 8S.38 001-2300-1010 24 80715C 07/09 07/15 07567 Legal Ad -FPL 97-019 83.88 | I _ TE DUE THRU..............)7115/97 - VENDOR `dam VENDOR ID. Tb. yr GSC rtP.LJl�t11i P"CJ.TY-NO PATCH P'3,LIiNE NO, ENTRY/DUET ` ! E -RI iNJ��i�E ,EuL:h PriuN AMOLNT ^•TT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- S,arp SeaLi.Tp Company SharpSeat 4':11-135;0-5310 L _ _`,71.aC 07/0; 07'15 15'3 Pas.ePara'--eExcurTickts 2 534.00 ICTAL ;I r#4NDW------_- 1 L, JJ a u F Sheraton Tacoma Nuel S?erTacoTa 00 1-4030-L"j �- 11 P'0715C 07/09 07/15 AccCPI- .C}ronf-Mglson 43!.20 TOTAL DUE VEtLr'CR--------3 437.20 Spectacular Affairs 5pectacuia 0f�1-4?'0- 325 3 80715,G 61!4-018 07/',x9 07/15 PntraPr-k:GrdSrkq-7/1Suppis C TOTAL PREP41D AUNT ----! TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i 0.00 R. Jude Medical Center gf LdeMed 001-2300-1002 1 1*' 1-N, (}7_/(1'315 7/� i 1L :c, °.- Rfnd-ScrtyOepst-Prk 200.00 TOTAL DUE VENIDOR--------} YXJ-00 j L wti 'ard Insurance_" of Lira Sta ndardin l-i;lll-;{;:;, 2 EW715A 07/09 07/15 Life .ns Prems-July 464.'Ar 005 N/' -G-19 017/15 Quppl Life Ins Pregzs-uulp ?sS 41) 0 ICTAL PRtPAID AMOUNT ----- }IAL C:t1E VEt01CR-------- s (I. ivy .iperCu+s auperCuts 011". 1 - 230 - 10 13 1 S0715C 07r]9 07/15 Refund-?lnc rtpisft 100.10 807' Jl 07/0,9 071/15 36672 Re?-_+llnd-P.annrg Cee `.5. U0 TOTAL DUE VEND---------- 1-he Cch0 Group CobbCToup VC .3 80717A 01/598Q 07/09 07/15 13722,)1 Suhscrptr;-Wirdw NT Rin 5^ .r;,3 TOTAL DUE VEND --------! 89100 The Cobb Group CobbGr-oap 00i -405V-14:320 4 '0715A, , 07iG`7 G,/1S S~tb=crptn-InsideFgemkr 59,000 ICTAL DUE VEN JSR--------; 5?. 010 Wong, Petty wmgB 001-230'.-1002 12 00715C 07,109 07/15 '-519 Ref..nd-ScrtvCiepst-RnReagn 50',.'0 TOTAL ILE `,'ENDM --------; 50.00 . *»* C�tv cf Diamonu Bar '** r~ �~'` q</ -/y �� -I IME. cls -1,07/10/97 V O� C H E R R E G l 3 T E R ` |l/ DUE THRU.............�7�5�7 VENDOR NAME VMOR IO D. * * PREPAID * * ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------ PROJ.TX�� BATCH PO.LTNEIN0. ENTRY/DUE INVnlC[ 0�C8IPTIDN AMOUNT O4TE CH.ECK Wrig,ht,Paul g�� 001'4090-4000 3 80715C 01/6058 07/89 07/15 Audio/Yisua1Svcs-7/1,2 �V.00 | TOTAL PR[PAID-----} � .313.25 TOTAL DUE --------> 25.4cfd.93 TOTAL REPORT -------> 47,812.18 r^ ^ � - � /' RUIN TIME: 08:12 07/10/97'V O U [ H E R R E6 i S T E R ' / - FUND SUARY REPJRT 2UE THRU....... ..... 07/m5yR DISBU�SE Gl�� W�LL P�� G ALS POSTED FUND TOTAL DIRECT �� REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE EXPENSE —__--_______—_--_'___________—_—_—_—_'__—_---____—______—+----------------- (XII ___' _— _ 0OI General Fund 112 Pf-op A_Tr-m!,Isit F TOTAL ALL FUNDS 47,740 13- 33,289.39 i23.Tj- 14,17M4 -----'— '------- —'-----' —'------- ------' ------ --- —^----- ! June 24, 1997 -77 TO: City of Diamond Bar - ATTENTION: Tommye Nice, Deputy City Clerk. RE: Claim Santos v. City of Diamond Bar Claimant Charmaine Santos D/Event 04 -Apr -97 Rec'd Y/Office 1$ -Jun -97 Our File S-94170-LBQ We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action below: • CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY C' Dwight J. Kunz cc: CJPIA w/enc. Attn.: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Orive . Ste 400.Orange, CA 92868 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 740-7999 Ext. 140 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 740-9412 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY r, >=- INSTRUCTIONS L Claims for death,injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than 6 mos. after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than I year after the occurrence. (Gov. Cade Sec. 911.2) 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6_ Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim must be filed with City Cleric. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a) To: The City of Diamond Har �[ame of Claimant L'7H4PAIJIg1,&1' s�i�Tz5 Home Address of Claimant City and State 6,12 GRERT F3EIVO JD1,A9 npA ,0 SAa, C',q Business Address of Claimant City and State 111411 4 RR o uJ C-4 Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: (pr2 6y,eENr f367VQ !� lYd0M, f3 /q72 , La, 'F176,5- How 176,5 How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. 97 JUN 13 t,E 11 3: 3 6 Age of Claimant (if ntural person) dome Telephone Number usiae Telephone Number ICf 101'X0 - V4I 2 F& DRl�ii Ncti G ✓ER CaE�� �5�� P T QF C /ea,w� o E ;Ai:aa, did r,: I."..;':RY occ:u? GiVe f:'r r:rtic• '� da,date, time of Wda;y . ,4�..o G���E� or���✓�s_ Where did DA_IMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, wher� appropriate, give street names and addresses and measurements from landmarks: �/gmoNO l�Rn PG1/�. �i'�/,NGS ��tTH �F'•TW�"�1 (vo E�WAy ,,�,O G a,L-O hF / 3,04 / n1 6E 'What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees ca sing the injury or damage, if known: 77-fC- !AJ 77-� Qom 'khat DAN'_.'_GE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed: UAB aG 70 771-)0 /Z! M S , QU/lE— 1 f 4I° ftuGA.)A4&-7V Wi,at AMOU' T do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this clam, giving basis of computation: Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or darnsage, giving basis of computation: / �/ f 1-e (-77-1 rC? �C %7 G » -t / r7} i�ny-• SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED O REVERSE SIDE lasurance payments received, if any, a:._ nar..es of Insurance Company: penditum res ade on account oi. accident or in;uzy: (Date Do Ex ,,,me and address of Witnesses. Doctors and Hospitals: �r? 0 k0 / 7G 6-3 {,fr rr� � C�c'r► % `�: C A vT�3 READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following clicgram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. cle when you If City Vehicle was fi st saw Ciityate by letter "A" vehcle; locationlocation of City of City vehicle at time of accident 1r t by "A -P and location of yourself or your or your vehicle when you. g_I" and the point of impact by "X." vehicle at the time of the accident by " ;MOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS . .... jr\5 CUR ' 7 71 14 signature of Claimant or person filing on his behalf giving relationship to Claimant' FOR OTHER si ACCIDENTS S G 7J/i3 /n0n/,0 A,¢ P c v'0 Typed Name: 9 v CURS rF D ate CHARMAI�ANTOS 13935 BRADBURY WAY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 SERVICE ADVISOR CARLOS SEANEZ PAGE INVOICE NO. 83346 D'' 9 94 SAVAGE BMW 1301 AUTO CENTER DRIVE ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 3 0-7888 BAR# AL -121515 EPA# qAD982489148 FILTER INSERT .cr«-.,:a_c. ❑Mur:riEwt :.- .. CUST;NQ.. .- TAiu....,..� ...PRINTED 04APR97 - __ : TIME IN TIME READIR YEAR. MAKE&MODEL TELEPNCINE'N[1. A 4APR97 04APR97 WBACC9322VEE56324 EE56324ijW BY13:30 17:35 97 BMW 3182 909-396-138V96 MfLEAGEW M€LEA<3e:O 1T LICENSE.:- . .. 10814 10814 TE•µ: -TX BMW ENGINE OIL SERVICE SPECIAL..." (1.00} 0000249 ENGINE OIL SERVICE e Want INVOICE NO. 83346 D'' 9 94 Y 59 W94 0.50 (N/C) PARTS AMOUNT 1 11-42-1-432-097 OIL TO Be SUBLET AMOUNT- FILTER INSERT (NIC) ORAL APPROVAL OF L ESTIMATED PRICE, MISC. CHARGES 1 07-11-9-963-130 SEAL TOTAL CHARGES LESS INS / ADJ RING * (N/C) PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 2 07-11-9-963-355 SEAL SATISFIED RING (N/C) 1 82-14-5-407-502 7-W/S WAS ADD 500ML (N/C) 1 88-88-6-900-335 SAVAG BMW, Inc. OIL -ORD 81229407569 (NIC) At Savage BMW, we pride ourselves 3 83-22-1-467-993 1 LT in our dedication of keeping our DIFF OIL (N/C) customers comple ely satisfied FC: PART#: COUNT: CLAIM TYPE: Soon you will be contacted by AUI'H CODE: _ ' BMWNA regarding thi service. If you `' � ' cannot answer all the questions with TEL SHOP SUPPLIES ... an excellent rating, please let us know. Call your service advisor or myse6f. CUST HIT POT HOLE & NEEDS BOTH FRT 'a REAR RT Yours Truly SIDE RIMS REPL. 3699 INSTAT T, TWn Wui~ 1~ T.c nAMAGED TERMS: CASH OR THE FOLLOWING: MASTER CARD * DINERS VISA * AMERICAN EXPRESS RENTAL CAR SERVICE IS AVAILABLE TO OUR SERVICE CUSTOMERS. PLEASE SEE YOUR SERVICE ADVISOR DESCRIPTION LABOR AMOUNT TOTALS OEUCA NAL REV] ESTmeATE ES'nIAATE $ $ ngelo Verlingo Service Mgr. I ED PARTS AMOUNT GAS,OIL, LUBE SUBLET AMOUNT- I ACKNOWLEDGE NOT;CE ANC ^ AN INCREASE IN THE ORIGIN X ORAL APPROVAL OF L ESTIMATED PRICE, MISC. CHARGES TOTAL CHARGES LESS INS / ADJ SALES TAX PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT CHARMAZ,JSANTOS 13935 BRADBURY WAY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 SERVICE ADVISOR CARLOS SEANE'Z' PAGE SAVAGE IBMW 1301 AUTO CEN ER DRIVE ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 390-7888 BAR# AL -121515 EPA# C AD982439148 wBirTEN. - rTTArrr M P rrnpv DATE READY STOCK NO, : VEHICLE IDENTIfICATION::. LIST Nd0 TAG NO. P:O. ivo PFVN7ED IC INVOE NO., 4APR97 04APR97 WBACC9322VEE56324 EE56324 T386 � [04P�R9783346 TIME INTIME kY , .- LA&M RATE-. -- SAW 8Y 5fA 13:3a 17:35 97 BMW 3181 909-396-1386 75.00 21NOV96 94 MILEAGE. lM1k MILEAGE 4UT LICENSE�Nd. - :.' .... .. 10814 10814 59 C 0.50 0.00 0.00 .' `�,c3 Want \/ 2 36-11.-1-181-957 STEEL e IOLI RIM 80.00 80.00 160.00 UBL PO#33780/CIA/MOUNT & BALANCE... To Be C 25.00 25.00 ** 4 WHEEL ALIGNMENT 3100 4 WHEEL ALIGN!!= 2.00 150.00 150.00 i SATISFIED ** REPLACE BROYEN9HUB CAP I SOP SPECIAL ORDERED PART HAS BEEN ORDERED TO COMPLETE THE ABOVE 0SAVAG REPAIRS..... PARTS DEPT WILL NOTIFY BMW, hC. I WHEN IN At Savage BMW, we pride ourselves j 59 C 0.00 0.00 0.00 in our dedication o keeping our 1 36-13-1-094-158 customers comple ely satisfied *WHEEL COVER 3�. ;7s `k S5q4-7-5 35.75 STOMER PAY HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR REPAID. ORDER Soon you will be contacted --�-1.96 by ,, .4: ra BMWNA regarding thisservice. If you cannot answer all the questions with I -an excellent rating, please let us know. Call your service advisor or myself. I Yours Truly I Angelo Verlingo * PRE -INVOICE ** DESCRIPTION TOTALS Service Mgr. I LABOR AMOUNT TERMS: CASH OR THE FOLLOWING: 150.00 EST'e""TE PARTS AMOUNT75 MASTER CARD * DINERS ESTI 19ar. ATE j GAS,OJL, LUBE VISA * AMERICAN EXPRESS a. a0 $ -------- ORAL APPROVAL OF SUBLET AMOUNT 2S.00 I ACKNOWLEDGE NOTICE ANC MISC. CHARGES 1 96 AN INCREASE IN THE ORIGIN L E671MATED PRICE. TOTAL CHARGES 372.71 LESS INS / ADJ 0.00 1 SALES TAX PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 15.17 X 7, Ij B.A.R LICENSE #AL -121515 EPA# CAD 982489148 APR 04 /} RENTAL CAR SERVICE IS AVAILABLE------ TO OUR SERVICE CUSTOMERS. PLEASE SEE YOUR SERVICE ADVISOR rTTArrr M P rrnpv PART NO. C:A UN ~ 1-91-1-052-206 ARTIC/SILVER 1 19 . 975j 19.95 19. 1'' -HANK YOU FOP YOUR BUSINESS! i ARTS HCTLINE (909)39C-7897 PARTS �5 Ot RS MCN-FRI 7AM-6PM SUBLET nTUi��A 8AM- 5PM FREIGHT i ^ �S 77S ASO��T THIS WEER' S SPECIALS!! i SALES TAX J ] PLEASE READ LIMITED WARRANTY ON REVERSE SIDE. S,S7 X TOTAL X21.5 TERMS NO RETURNS ON ELECTRICAL OR SPECIAL ORDER ITEMS.. A 15% RESTOCKING CHARGE WILL BE APPLIED ON ALL MERCHANDISE RETURNED FOR CREDIT. NO RETURNS AFTER 10 DAYS. NO REFUND WITHOUT THIS INVOICE. 1668 - ll Q 1221�i� ^ �62 0-7 a ,— CHARMAFNE SANTOS LIC. A9978622 PH. 909 95-1388 13935 BRADBURY WAY� t RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 97739 A ✓/Gema (�'ft:.G�.t+�=•+t.t� A 12 21011911: 1668 0826 3??91Bl"m DAMAGE �ANrOS at 17:35 PIC;wer D. R. 251 AJz4201_E Power mirrors Est: �. ��F-Af CJ W C- L_ EE P4 ��� Cj I L_ 1 --:- j- C�j F,_j L_;����� FAX # 9090-38c�5 1301 8 AUTO UENTER Di-,, UNTAHlV, �A 91/61— (9elg) 390-3882 u C, C- t 0.wner: CHARMAIME Day Phone: ( ) Address: Other Ph: ( } Deduct ible: $ N/A Insurance �o.: Claim No � Phone: ^ BUMPER 97 8MW 3161 4D SED 1ILVEH 4-1.9L—FI vzn: WL'*C1"�322VEF56324 License: �AMTREZ Proo Date: 9/96 i/L�ome4er: steeringPQwer Power PIC;wer w3.m:.�r,�-Js Power locks Power mirrors A-ir conditioning Rear defogger u C, C- t S e .0-. t S L-I.Dar coat paint Metallic pa -Int PART --------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUMPER Front Bumper inc I Bumper cover sedan Pod for Ciear Coat !A". 113 AS Repi Hardware kit 1+ 77 Re -ml RT Molding outer 19.50 zi 2 10 GRILIE i3 Rod for L;lear L:oat -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 17 Paqe: 1 !J,-iMAGE RE F,t-1S-?T 04/10/97 at 173=5 W 1 420 i 3 1-i1"PR t . 4 LsAYS TO REP441 R. Hly f U' 1301 B AUTO LENTER DR P'cert s :i 0`j . 1 Body Labor 11.8 units in '�'_ . ct{s _-t4.'iF� Paint Labor 6.9 units @ =Q,7R is Paint/Materials 6.9 units $R0.00 1SK. 0—, Su o1 et /Mi sc W a _,c SUBTOTAL $ 82 Tax on $ 257. i7 at ----------------------------------------------- 7.l500% s.,. — !JPP�-4D TOTAL 1f -4S RAWE PAYS IHIS EETIPNATIIF IS bHSFD jiN t .sR I( 'F4TRIN AND DOE NLIT i:{% FR ANUTIOWL PROS Lia{ LNBuR WWKH *Y FF RFULlli{Et? AFFR T WjRx iiAS BON STARTED. IFTEF T>f '�jw� j'T �3 bTAFTEi1, WORN QR DAMAGED FARTS WHICH WERE NF)T EY.,F—Nf f14 THE FIRST INiPECTIFIN MAY BE 0I.s`0]VERE0. ;dHF im ALLY, THIS EST INAT! �ANNOT COVER SEUH € lINTINKNtIF5. Estimate based on WJT[R CRASH EE'TIMATINS KIIDi. Noss—asteriW*) items are dpriven from the Guide RFib40. Database Dat? 31' 7 hcnubiE ?5terlski**) items indicate part supplied by a supplier stiier than the uric ial equipment Salluract!rer. LA[ H Re" have been certified for fit acid Irish by t;`;e Certified Auto tart_ Hssociation. EZE:t - A product rsf -7,CC information Services ilio. Paget: L CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.: 4w . TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 8, 19 TITLE: Award of Contract for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. SUMMARY: At the May 6, 1997 City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97.30 approving specifications for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. Council authorized and directed the City Clerk to advertise and receive bids. Notice to bidders was published on May 12, 1997. Eight (8) bids were submitted and opened on June 9, 1997 and i he apparent low bidder was Chino Construction. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the bids and award the proposed col to Chino Construction for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane, in an amour to exceed $24,990.00 Furthermore, it is recommended that the Council authorize a conting( amount of $2,500.00 for project change orders to be approved by the City Manager, for a to authorization of $27,490.00. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Public Hearing Notification —Resolution(s) Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's Office) — Ordinances(s) _ x Other : Construction Contract Agreement(s) not EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NIA Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA _ Yes No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Community Services Department, Community Development Dept. & City Manager REVI�EY: Terrence L. "elan pAV DeStavid iu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Work CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. ISSUE STATEMENT To comply with ADA requirements providing for safe and contiguous pedestrian access. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive the bids and award the proposed contract to Chino Constructic the Construction. of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane, in an amount not to exceed $24,990.0( Furthermore, it is recommended that the Council authorize a contingency amount of $2,500.( for project change orders to be approved by the City Manager, for a total authorization of $27,490.00. FINANCIAL SUMMARY $106,270.00 of CDBG federal funds was approved and incorporated into the FY 1996-97 for these sidewalk improvements. This is a carry-over project from FY 1996-1997 and ful have been re -allocated in the FY 1997-1998 budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION At the May 6, 1997 City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97-30, approvinE specifications for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. The project consists 32 Liquid Amber parkway trees to be removed, 3400 square feet of sidewalk to be removed reconstructed, 60 square feet of driveway approaches to be removed and reconstructed, and linear feet of curb and gutter to be removed and reconstructed. As a separate project to be administered by Community Services, 46 new Crape Myrtle parkway trees will be replanted shortly after the completion of this project. for eget Notice to bidders was published on May 12, 1997. Eight (S) bids were submitted and opened on June 9, 1997 and the apparent low bidder was Chino Construction. The bids received were as follows: COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. Chino Construction $24,990.00 2. Ranco Corporation $25,447.60 3. Nobest, Inc. $28,822.00 4. Kalban, Inc. $32,814.40 5. Aggie Construction $35,600.00 6. Southland Construction $41,400.00 7. 14i Tech Pro Construction $43,500.00 S. M.T. Construction $46,500.00 Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor include: * Plan and schedule to be submitted at least seven days before beginning of work. * Notification to affected agencies. * Completion of all work within fifteen (15) working days. * Liquidated damages of $100/day for non-performance. * Compliance with CDBG requirements. * Labor compliance with Davis -Bacon requirement. The project schedule is tentatively set as follows: Award of Contract Notice to Proceed Start of Construction Completion of Construction Prepared By: Rose Manela July 15, 1997 August 4, 1997 August 4, 1997 August 22, 1997 AGREEMENT The following agreement is made and duplicate, as of the date executed by the Mayor the City Clerk, by and between Chino hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Di Bar, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." entered into, and attested I Construction, WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids bids were received, publicly opened, and declared specified in the notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of CONTRACTOR Chino Construction, Inc. and; in o by Inc. mond or Propo als, on the Idate WHEREAS, City has authorized the Mayor to execute a wri contract with CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment material for the Construction of Sidewalks Along Aspen Grove in the City of Diamond Bar. tten and Lane NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CONTRACTOR shall furnish necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment and do the work for the Construction of Sidewalks Along 2� Grove Lane the City of Diamond Bar. The work to be performed in accorc with the plans and specifications, dated May 6, 1997 (The F and Specifications) on file in the office of the City Clerk ar accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accorc with the instructions of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENT The Plans and Specifications are incorporated herein by refer and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if set f in full herein. The Plans and Specifications, CONTRACT Proposal dated June 6, 1997, together with this written agreem shall constitute the contract between the parties. This cont is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accord with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be perfo by the CONTRACTOR whether set out specifically in the contrac not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency ex between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, provisions of this written agreement shall control. 1 all for in ance lans d in ance ence Orth OR'S ent, ract and med or sts the 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT The CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work within fifteen (15) working days from the date of the notice to proceed. The CONTRACTOR agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of five hundred ($500.00) dollars for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the CONTRACTOR under this agreement. Progress payments made after the sche uled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liqui ated damages. 4. INSURANCE: The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontracto has been obtained. The CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain a all times during the life of this contract the following polici s of insurance: a. Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or th ough subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintainEd in full force and effect during the period coverEd by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every CONTRACTOR shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. The CONTRACTOR, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the Ciy a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the perforance of work of this contract." 2 b. For all operations of the CONTRACTOR or any contractor in performing the work providec herein, insurance with the following minimum 1 and coverage: c. sub - for mits 1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not uto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not uto) $250,000 each person; $500,000 aggregate 3) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Bodily I jury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 4) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Property D mage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. 5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. Each such policy of insurance provided fo in paragraph b. shall: 1) Be issued by an insurance company approvd in writing by City, which is admitted t do business in the State of California. 2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, its officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; 3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upoi to cover a Loss under the policy; 4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice 3 of such cancellation or reduction of cov as evidenced by receipt of a regis letter." age red 5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to the City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: 1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herei ; 2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' written notice thereof given to.City by registered mail. e. The CONTRACTOR shall, within ten (10) days fror date of the notice of award of the Conti deliver to the City Manager or his designee original policies of insurance required paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or deliver to the Manager or his designee a certificate of insurance company, showing the issuance of insurance, and the additional insured and c provisions required herein. 5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Divi 2, Part 7,.Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the CONTRACTOR is requ to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem w for work of a similar character in the locality in which the pu works is performed, and not less than the general prevailing of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that reg the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the S of California is required to and has determined such gen prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevai rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City C of the City of Diamond. Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Dr Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested p on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determination be posted at the job site. The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as penalty to City, 4 the ct,. the in ity the uch her in ion red ges lic ate rd, ate ral ing erk ve, rty to not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general pre- vailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Coulicil, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR is required to make contribution to funds established for the administrative of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprentic able trade on such contracts and if other CONTRACTOR'S on the p blic works site are making such contributions. The CONTRACTOR and subcontractor under him shall c m.ply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Dir ctor of Industrial Relations, ex ---officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Divisi n of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor hall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the CONTRACTOR and any sub- contractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the. State of California having to do with working hours set .forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to C.ity, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed. in the execution of the contract, by him or any sub - CONTRACTOR under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which the.laborer, workman or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to exeCUtE the work required by this contract as such travel and subsis'ence payments are defined in the applicable collective barganing agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773. . 5 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Diamond Bar an( officers, agents and employees ("Idemnitees") shall not answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of materials or other things used or employed in performing the T, or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workme employees of the CONTRACTOR, of his subcontractor's or the pul or for damage to adjoining or other property from any c whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performanc the work. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damac injury to any person or property resulting from defect: obstructions or from any cause whatsoever. The CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnitees against will hold and save Indemnitees harmless from any and all act: claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligatiol liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, t entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organize arising out of or in connection with the work, operation activities of the CONTRACTOR, his agents, employees, subcontrac or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concw passive or active negligence on the part of City. In connec therewith: f its be that the 7ork; sn or >lic, rause :e of re or or and ons, s or irm, tion or tors rent tion a. The CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any such claims, dam ges, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any jud rendered against the CONTRACTOR or Indemn covering such claims, damages, penal obligations and liabilities arising out of connection with such work, operations or activ of the CONTRACTOR hereunder, and the CONTR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees har therefrom. c. In the event Indemnitees are made a party tc action or proceeding filed or prosecuted agz the CONTRACTOR for damages or other claims ar- out of or in connection with the work, operatic activities hereunder, the CONTRACTOR agrees tc to Indemnitees and any all costs and expE incurred by Indemnitees in such action proceeding together with reasonable attori fees. 9 ment tees ies, r in ties ess any inst sing n or pay nses or eys' So much of the money due to the CONTRACTOR under a d by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by Citj may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims .for damages as aforesaid. This indemnity provision shall survive the terminati n of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or rem dies which Indemnitees may have under the law. This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under this Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Indemnitor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. 10. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1735, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons in the work contemplated by this Agreement because of the race, color or religion of such person. A violation of this section exposes the CONTRACTOR to the penalties provided for in .Labor Code Section 1735. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the CONTRACTOR for furnishing all material and doing the prescribed work the unit prices set forth in the Prase Schedule in accordance with CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated June 6. 1997 . 12. ATTORNEY'S FEES: In the event that any actior. or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any terIlL of provision of the this agreement, the prevailing party shall rec ver its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred with res ect thereto. 13. TERMINATION: This agreement may City, without cause, upon the giving of Termination" to CONTRACTOR at least thirty date of termination specified in the notice. termination, CONTRACTOR shall only be paid and expenses necessarily incurred prior to termination. 7 be terminated by the a written "Notic of (30) days prior to the In the event of 3uch for services rend red the effective dat of N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement with allthe formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California "CONTRACTOR'S" License No. 1 qC Date By. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 13y.- Date y:Date MAYOR ATTEST: By: CITY CLERK Date CONTRACTORS Business Phone Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any tirne DZ :APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date 22 P-01 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.:; TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 8, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Award of Professional Inspection Services Contract for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. SUMMARY: At the May 6, 1997 City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97-30 approving specifications for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. On May 9, 19 7 the Department of Public Works solicited proposals for Professional Inspection Services for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. Three (3) proposals were received on May 16, 1997 and Dewan, Lundin & Associates was the most qualified proposer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award the proposed inspection service contract t Dewan, Lundin & Associates for Professional Inspection Services for the Construction of Sidew ks on Aspen Grove Lane, in an amount not to exceed $4,330.00. Furthermore, it is recommended that he Council authroize a contingency amount of $500.00 for project change orders to be approved by t e City Manager, for a total authorization of $4,830.00. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification — Resolution(s) X Bid Specifications (on file in City Ordinances(s) Clerk's Office) — Agreement(s) x Other: CDBG Consulting Services Agreement EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION.- ISTRIBUTION:SUBMITTAL SUBMITTALCHECKLIST` 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NIA Yes No _ 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A Yes No _ Which Commission" 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Community Services Department, Community Development Dept. & City Manager REX,ITAJEIABY. Terrence L. Belag r k- mes DeStefano G. Liu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Professional Inspection Services Contract for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. ISSUE STATEMENT To comply with ADA requirements providing for safe and contiguous pedestrian access. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council award the proposed inspection service contract to Dewan, Lundin & Associates for Professional Inspection Services for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane, in an amount not to exceed $4,330.00. Furthermore, it is recommended that the Council authorize a contingency amount of $500.00 for project change orders to be approved by the City Manager, for a total authorization of $4,&30.00. FINANCIAL SUMMARY 5106,270.00 of CDBG federal funds was approved and incorporated into the FY 1996-97 bt for these sidewalk improvements. This is a carry-over project from FY 1996-1997 and fund, have been re -allocated in the FY 1997-1998 budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION At the May 6, 1997 City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 97-30 approving specifications for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. On May 9, 1997 the Department of Public Works solicited proposals for Professional Inspection Services for the Construction of Sidewalks on Aspen Grove Lane. On May 16, 1997, three (3) proposals we] received from Dewan, Lundin & Associates, Hall & Foreman, and Charles Abbott Associates The firms were asked to identify their scope of work and anticipated number of hours per da to provide adequate oversight and observation. Based on these responses, the three proposals wen reviewed and compared. Dewan, Lundin & Associates was determined to be the most qualified proposer. COMPANY IIID AMOUNT HOURLYRAT. I. Dewan, Lundin & Associates 1 $4,330.00 $42/hr - Inspects 2. Hall & Foreman, Inc. a $3,150.00 $75/hr - Inspects J. Charles Abbott Associates 3 $4,500.00 $75/hr - Inspects 1 Based on 6 hours a day for 15 working days for inspector plus a total of 10 hours fo: administration work. 2 Based on an assumption that the project area would be divided into 4 sections at 3 inspections within each section for each phase of construction and 3.5 hours per insp for a total of 42 hours. 3 Based on daily inspections at an average of 4 hours per working day for construction observation. Dewan, Lundin & Associates will be providing project oversight, pre -construction meeting attendance and minutes, primary contact and administrator for the contractor and utility companies, inspections and continuous monitoring of progress, prepare & submit detailed c inspection reports, verify quantities, review any contractor's submittals for City approval, r4 contractor's invoices for City approval, develop Punch List, prepare final project report for approval and acceptance. Dewan, Lundin & Associates has complied with all CDBG regulations and has signed the attached CDBG Consulting Services Agreement. Prepared By: Rose Manela AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of _RM 17. 1997 by and between the City of Diamonc Bar, a municipal corporation ("City") and DEWAN LUNDIN& ASSOCIATES, ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide col sulting services to City as set forth in Exhibit "A", the City's Request for Proposals dated MAY 9 997 B. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform such consulting services by virtL e of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and condition onditio herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Exhibit "B" the Consultant's Response, dated MAY 16, 1997 to the City's Request for Proposals. B. Level of Services/Time of Performance. The level of and time of the specific to be performed by Consultant are asset forth in Exhibit "B." 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall tape effect JUNE 17 1997 and shall continje until AUGUST19.1997 unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. 3. Compensation. City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Co ultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B." Payment vill be made only after submission of proper invoices in the form specified by City. Total payment to Co ultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed FORTY-THREE- HUMIZED THIRTY dollars (S_4.33).00). 4. Generai Terms and Conditions. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 5. Addresses. City: City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive Consultant: DEWAN, LUNDIN & ASS SURENDER DEWAN 12377 LEWIS ST., !#101 Suite 100 GARDEN GROVE, CA 9i Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 PHN 714 748-8840 FAX 714 740-8842 !M 6. Status as Independent Consultant. A. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent Cori tractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees f City. B. Consultant agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Ate, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and literest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In event that City is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Consult nit and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between City and Consultant, then Consultant agrees to reimburse City for all costs, including accounting and attorn 's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Cot sultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any fa dure of Consultant to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset aga nst the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as i result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under thisettion 6. 7. Standard of Performance_ Consultant shall perform all work at the standard of care id skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar conditions. 8. Indemnification.. Consultant agrees to indemnify the City, its officers, agents, voltntecrs, employees, and attorneys against, and will hold and save theta and each of them harmless from, and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or cl ' ed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the acts, eirors or omissions -of Consultant, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, including each person o entity responsible for the provision of services hereunder. In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Agreement as a Consultant, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 8 shall be joint and several: 9. Insurance. Consultant shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintaim, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and appro ed by the City (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $ I,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of w, ongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in perform ce of services tinder this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $500,000. 0; (3) automotive liability insurance, with minimum combined single limits coverage of $500,000.00; (4) prof sional liability insurance (errors and omissions) to cover or partially cover damages that may be the result of rrors, omissions, or negligent acts of Consultant, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; i nd (5) 2 Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders F. in the event of the CONSULTANTS non-compliance with the equal opportunity clauses of the Amort or with any such rules, regulations'or orders, this Agreement may be cancelled, terrain ted, or suspended in whole or in part and the CONSULTANT may be declared ineligible for firrther government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or as otherwise provided by law. G. The CONSULTANT will include the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (f) ' every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Laboi issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The CONSULTANT will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the CITY may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance; provided, however, that in the event the CONSULTANT becomes involved ' or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such directions by the CITY, the CONSULTANT may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 16. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, no shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the 1 of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistant 17. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. No person in the United Sates shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participa 'on in, be denied the benefits of� or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in who a or in part with funds made available under this title. 18. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Any pro 'bition against discrimination of the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, or with respec to an odxrwise qualified handicapped individual, as provided in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 19711, shall also apply to any such program or activity. Opportunities. 19. "Section 3" Compliance in the Provision of Training, Employment and A. The work to be performed under this Agreement is on a project assisted under a program providing direct federal furancial assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u. Section 3 requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for trainirg and employment be given to lower income residents of the project area and contract for work in connectionth the project be awarded to business concerns which are Iocated in or owned in substantial part by persons re si ' g in the area of the project B. The parties to this Agreement will comply with the provisions of said Section 3 and the regulations issued pursuant thereto by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development set f rth in 24 CFR 135, and all applicable rules and orders of the Department issued thereunder prior to the execui ion of this Agreement. The parties to this Agreement certify and agree that they are under no contractual or other disability which would prevent them from complying with these requirements. C. The CONSULTANT will send to each labor organization or represent wormers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, in any, advising the said labor organization of workers' representatives of workers with which he has a a bargaining agreernent or other contract or understanding, if any, a notice advising the said labor organiz workers' representatives of his commitments under this Section 3 clause and shall post copies of the n conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment or training. D. The CONSULTANT will include this Sere 3 clause in every subco work in connection with the project and will, at the direction of the applicant for or recipient of federal assistance, take appropriate action pursuant to the fact upon a finding that the subcontractor is in ofregulations under 24 CFR Party 135 will not let any subcontract unless subcontractor has first pros with a preliminary statement of ability to comply with the requirements of these regulations. E. Compliance with the provisions of Section 3, the regulations set for CFR Part 135, and all applicable rules and orders of the contract, shall be a condition of the federal f assistance provided to the project, binding upon the applicant or recipient for such assistance, its succes& assigns. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall subject the applicant or recipient, its contract, subcontractor, its successors and assigns to those sanctions specified by the grant or loan agreement or s through which federal assistance is provided, and to such sanctions as are specified by 24 CFR Part13 20. Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of City, attempt by Consultant to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereund be void and of no effect. 21. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anni of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafer throughout the term of this Agreement. T1 Product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or con received by City during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. City shall ma Consultant prior to preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, C direct Consultant to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as p: herein. 22. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 23. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or 1 the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of perfo under this Agreement. In no event shall the malting by City of any payment to Consultant constitul construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the Consultant, and the malting of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or available to City with regard to such breach or default. 24. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any 0 tive of notice of in for him in 24 and and r the I any shall. work with may of or be art of Or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing arty in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 25. Notices. Any notices, bilis, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be i Immed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by facsimile bqfore or during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 26. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordan with the applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, regulations and directives as they pertain to the performance of this agreement. 27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each o which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrum t_ 28. County Lobbying Certification. The CONSULTANT certifies that: (A) It is understood that each person/entity/firm who applies for a Community Development Commission contract, and as part of that process, shall certify that they are familiar with the requirements of the Los Angeles County Code Chapter 2.160, (Los Angeles County Ordinance 93-0031) and: (B) That all persons/entity/firm who seeks a contract with the Community Development Commission shall be disqualified therefrom and denied the. contract and, shall be liable in civil actio if any lobbyist, lobbying firm, lobbyist employer or any other person or entity acting on behalf of the above nai nod fir fails to comply with the provisions of the County Code. 29. Lobbying Certification. The CONSULTANT certified that: (A) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behof the CONSULTANT, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any pricy, a Member of Congress, and officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of any Member of Con ess in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any cooperative agreement, d the extension, continuation renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or coop rative agreement. (B) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Coi kgress, an office of employee of employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the CONSULTANT shall complete and submit Stindard Form -LLL, "Disclosures Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. 7 (C) The CONSULTANT shall require that the language of this certification be incl ed in all subcontracts and that all subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly, 38. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by s ific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agr ent supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agra==t Amendments on behalf of the City will only be valid if signed by the City Maniger or the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. 31. Ezhibits, All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this 0 written above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date "City" ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR By: By: . City Clerk Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney "CON T " By: Its: C:1WP661LNDAKAYIAGREE-971DLA ASPENCDBG. 617 60 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 kvA REPORT DATE: July 7,1997 FROM: Linda G. Ma nuson, ssistant Finance Director TITLE: A resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar amending Resolution No. 91-72A , prescribing a method of drawing warrants and checks. upon City funds. SUMMARY: On June 17,1997, the City Council adopted the FY97-98 Municipal Budget. Included with the adoption of the budget was the approval of the reorganization plan which included a classification change of Accounting Manager to Assistant Finance Director. Resolution No. 91-72A, authorized the Mayor, Ci Treasurer and the Accounting Manager to sign City warrants and checks. Resolution No. 91-7213cha ges the authorized signatures to Mayor, City Treasurer and Assistant Finance Director. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 91-72B LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: ` Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) Other. Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No _ _ by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes — No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? ` Yes ` No Which Commission? e 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Yes qo Report discussed with the following affected departments: RMED Y: DEPARTMENT HEAD: VTerrence L. Belanb# Frank M. sher Linda GMagn6sdn City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant Finance Director RESOLUTION NO. 91-72B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-72A PRESCRIBING A METHOD OF DRAWING WARRANTS AND CHECKS UPON CITY FUNDS A. Recitals. (i) Pursuant to California law, the Mayor and City Clerk are required to execute and countersign all warrants and checks issued for payment from City funds. (ii) California Government Code Section 37203 provides that the City Council may prescribe an alternative method for drawing warrants and checks. (iii) The City Council of the City of Diamond. Bar desires to provide an alternative to insure the timely drawing of warrants and checks upon City funds. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby finds, and resolves as follows. 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 37203, all and warrants drawn on City funds shall be executed and countersigned by any two of the following three positions: a. Mayor b. City Treasurer c. Assistant Finance Director 3. Notwithstanding the provisions set forth above, any and all checks and warrants d: on City funds payable in excess of $10,000 shall be signed by the Mayor and one of the requi signatures thereof. 4. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the execution of all documents reasonably necessary to implement the method for payment of checks and warrants set forth above, including but not limited to, execution of documents pertaining to City Bank City's banking institution(s). S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City C of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1997, by the foll vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER: LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar with RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE ELECTION OF JOHN FASANA AS VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS. WHEREAS, John Fasana, Mayor of Duarte, one of the four League of California C Transportation Corridor Delegates to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), a Chair of the Transportation Committee for the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments its inception in 1994; and WHEREAS, John Fasana has shown outstanding leadership as a voting delegate on behalf of cities while serving on the MTA in spearheading projects such as the further expan for of the HOV Lane Network throughout Los Angeles County and adoption of its Master Plan ensuring funding for completion of the Pasadena Blue Line, adoption of the MTA 1997 Call for Projects ($22 million for San Gabriel Valley cities); adoption of the MTA Recovery Plan, adoption of the MTA Congestion Management Plan; and WHEREAS, John Fasana has support innovative concepts such as the Fare Debit for Transit Fare Payment, Bike Stations and Bike on Bus Programs; and WHEREAS, John Fasana has spearheaded the drive to extend the Blue Line to the of Claremont; and WHEREAS, John Fasana has collaborated to help all cities in Los Angeles County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Diamond Bar does affirr support of John Fasana as the 2nd Vice Chair of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County, and asks that all cities in the region support him. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 1997, by the following vote Mayor its I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City C of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1997, by the follow vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS.- ABSTAINED: EMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar W Arroyo Associates, roc. =� ' -818-564-8700 7/2/97 9:37 AIM 2/2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE ELECTED OF JOHN IyASANA AS VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CPIY OF FOLLOW, CALIFORNIA HERESY FINDS, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS WHEREAS, john Fasana, Mayor of Duarte, one of the four League of California Cities Transportation Corridor Delegates to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), and Chair of the Transportation Committee for the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments since its inception in 1994; and WHEREAS, john Fasana has shown outstanding leadership as a voting delegate on behalf of cities while serving on the MTA in spearheading projects such as the further expansion of the HOV Lane Network throughout Los Angeles County and adoption of its Master Plan, ensuring Ainding for completion of the Pasadena Blue Lore, adoption of the MTA 1997 Call for Projects ($22 million for San Gabriel Valley cities); adoption of the MTA Recovery Plan, adoption of the MTA Congestion Management Pian; WHEREAS, John Fasana has support innovative concepts such as the Fare Debit Card for Transit Fare Payment Bike stations and Bike on Sus Programs; and WHEREAS, John Fasana has spearheaded the drive to extend the Blue Line to the City of Claremont; and County; WHEREAS, John Fasana has collaborated to help all cities in Los Angeles NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ci of does affirm its support of John Fasana as the 2nd Vice Chair oT the Metropolitan Transportation Authority of Los Angeles County, and asks that all cities in the region support him. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 1997, by the following vote: AYES; NOES: ABSTAIN EXCUS£i} ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT �^ AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 7, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: City Council call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission to ap rove a proposed wireless telecommunications facility located at 24401 Darrin Drive,(C P 96- 10 and DR 96-9) Continued from. July 1, 1997. SUMMARY: On June 3, 1997, the City Council concluded their public hearing and continued a call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-10 and Development Review (DR) 96-9 to provide the applicant time obtain information requested by the Council. The issue before the City Council is wht ther or not to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 d DR 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. On July 1, 1997, the applicants requested a continuance to July 15, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of the Commission and direct staff as appropriate. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Resolution(s) _ Ordinance(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Applicants SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification _X Other: (see staff report att 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Inas the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? PLANNING COMMISSION 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: N)I! Lx-v-� . k& Terr6nce L. Bela 4&es DeStefano City Manager Deputy City Man _ Yes — No -2L Yes ._ No -2LYes _No -& Yes _No _Yes X No CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERRENCE L. BELANGER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CALL FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNIN( COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9) (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 3, 1997) DATE: JUNE 17, 1997 SUMMARY: On June 3, 1997, the City Council concluded their public hearing a d continued the call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission approving Conditional Use Permit. (CUP) 96-10 arid Development Review (DR) 96-9 to provide the applicant time to obtain information requested by the Council. The issue before the ClEy Council is whether or not to uphold the decision- of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. BACKGROUND: On May 6, 1997 the City Council called for review the Plannir g Commission's decision approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 as outii ed within Section 22.60.200 of the Planning and Zoning Code. On June 3, 1997, the Council voted to continue this item to 5: p.m_ June 17, 1997. This was to provide the Council 1 opportunity to visit the mock-up of the facility installed at the subj site and to allow the applicant time to provide the follow information: The height of the antennas and their precise locat relative to the flat pad; the color and location of the gravel; location of the lease line, the length of the property lease < whether the lease constitutes a subdivision of land. The applicant v ne zt ng on he nd ,as Memorandum to the City Council June 17, 1997 Page 2 also directed to provide accurate and complete details of projected tree maintenance and removal, a precise landscape plan, evidence that the site is not visible from surrounding properties, and construct a mock-up of the commercial metering pedestal placed farther away form the right-of-way. DISCUSSION: The applicant has outlined their response to the City Council's requests in the attached letter from JM Consulting, dated June 11, 1997 and has submitted revised plans for the Council's review. The revised plans depict the height and location of the antennas; the proposed landscaped area, the size and location of existing on-site trees, the relocation of the metering pedestal and includes more detailed elevations of the project site and equipment cabinets. Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code 22.60.250 upon initiating a call for review, the City Council may affirm, modify or deny the action of the Planning. Commission or refer the matter back to the Commission for further review. The City Council's decision may address all aspects of the project, including the addition or deletion of any conditions. Once a decision is made, the Council shall direct staff to develop a resolution with the appropriate findings to be brought back to the next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of the Planning Commission and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments: City Council Staff Report Dated June 3, 1997 (incorporating Planning Commission Staff Report Date April 22, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-6 Letter from JM Consulting Dated June 11, 1997 Revised Pians Dated June 12, 1997 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: June 17, 1997 REPORT DATE: June 11, 1997 FROM: Terrence. L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: City Council call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission to aporove a proposed wireless telecommunications facility located at 24401 Darrin Drive, (CP 96- 10 and DR 96-9) Continued from June 3, 1997: SUMMARY: On June 3, 1997, the City Council concluded their public hearing and continued a call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-10 and Development Review (DR) 96-9 to provide the applicant time tc obtain information requested by the Council. The issue before the City Council is wlx.,ther or not to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10and DR 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of the Commission and direct staff as appropriate. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: —�L Staff Report Resolution(s) Ordinance(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Applicants SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification —X— Other: (see staff report att, 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed NIA by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? PLANNING COMMISSION 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Yes _ No -2L Yes.— N •Yes_N • Yes _ N _Yes X N Terrence L. Belan FrankU. Ushef James DeStefano City Manager Assistant City Manager Community Development CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERRENCE L. BELANGER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CALL FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9) (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 3, 1997) DATE: JUNE 17, 1997 SUMMARY: On June 3, 1997, the City Council concluded their public hearing a d continued the call for review of the decision of the Plannirig Commission approving Conditional Use Permit- (CUP) 96-10 atid Development Review (DR) 96-9 to provide the applicant time to obtain information requested by the Council. The issue before the Ci y Council is whether or not to uphold the decision of the Planniiig Commission approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. BACKGROUND: On May 6, 1997 the City Council called for review the Planni Commission's decision approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 as outlin within Section 22.60.200 of the Planning and Zoning Code. On June 3, 1997, the Council voted to continue this item to 5:30 p.m. June 17, 1997. This was to provide the Council tie opportunity to visit the mock-up of the facility installed at the subj ct site and to allow the applicant time to provide the followi g information: The height of the antennas and their precise locati n relative to the flat pad; the color and location of the gravel; tie location of the lease line, the length of the property lease aid whether the lease constitutes a subdivision of land. The applicant was Memorandum to the City Council June 17, 1997 Page 2 also directed to provide accurate and complete details of project tree maintenance and removal, a precise landscape plan, evidence th the site is not visible from surrounding properties, and construct mock-up of the commercial metering pedestal placed farther aw form the right-of-way. DISCUSSION: The applicant has outlined their response to the City Council requests in the attached letter from JM Consulting, dated June 1' 1997 and has submitted revised plans for the Council's review. The revised plans depict the height and location of the antennas; t proposed landscaped area, the size and location of existing on -s trees, the relocation of the metering pedestal and includes me detailed elevations of the project site and equipment cabinets. a s 0 Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code 22.60.250 upon initiating a call for review, the City Council may affirm, modify or deny t e action of the Planning Commission or refer the matter back to t e Commission for further review. The City Council's decision m y address all aspects of the project, including the addition or deletion f any conditions. Once a decision is made, the Council shall dire t staff to develop a resolution with the appropriate findings to e brought back to the next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of tl}e Planning Commission and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments: City Council Staff Report Dated June 3, 1997 (Incorporating Planni g Commission Staff Report Date April 22, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-6 Letter from JM Consulting Dated June 11, 1997 Revised Plans Dated June 12, 1997 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERRENCE L. BELANGER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CALL FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE PLAN COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9) DATE: JUNE 3, 1997 SUMMARY: On May 6, 1997 the City Council voted to call for review 1 decision of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 and 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility 24401 Darrin Drive. The issue before the City Council is whether not to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted public hearings for the propos on January 28, 1997, February 25, 1997, March 25, 1997 and AI 22, 1997. On April 22, 1997 the Planning Commission completed public hearing approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 by a 4 to 1 vc and adopting Resolution No. 97-6. at or The Planning Commission approval permits the construction of a wireless telecommunications facility on a site adjacent to and below Armitos Place. As proposed, the facility will consist of equipment cabinets and antennas, all located below the street, not visible from Armitos Place, designed with landscaping and screening to blend in o the hillside site as viewed from above and the Pomona Freeway. On May 6, 1997 the City Council voted to call for review ti decision of 'the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 and C 96-9. Councilman Harmony requested that the Planning Commission decision be called up for review as outlined within Section 22.60.2( of the Planning and Zoning Code. Memorandum to the City Council June 3, 1997 Page 2 Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.60.40, notificatk of the City Council hearing was made in the San Gabriel Valli Tribune on May 13, 1997 and in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin May 14, 1997. Approximately 275 property owners within a 50 radius of the exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 were notified of tl public hearing by mail on May 14, 1997. At the request of the City Council the applicant has constructed a 3 dimensional mock-up of the proposed telecommunications facility on the subject site, which can be viewed by the Council and members of the public. Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code 22.60.250 upon initiating a call for review, the City Council may affirm the action of the Planning Commission, refer the matter back to the Commission for further review, or take any action that in the opinion of the Counc I, is indicated by the evidence. The City Council's decision may address all aspects of the project, including the addition or deletion of any conditions. Once a decision is made, the Council shall direct staff to develop a resolution with the appropriate findings to te brought back to the next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of Planning Commission and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 22, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-6 Approved Development Plans Minutes of the City Council Meeting of May 6, 1997 Minutes of Planning Commission Meetings of January 28, 199" February 25, 1997, March 25, 1997 and April 22, 1997. Letter dated April 29, 1997 from Councilman Harmony Petitions from Residents dated 2125197 and 4115197 First Amendment to the CC&R's for Tract 42584 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE. CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST PROPERTY LOCATION: APPLICANTS: PROPERTY OWNERS: City of Diamond B; PLANNING COMMISSIO' Staff Repo 6.1 April 16, 1997 April 22, 1997 Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 Development Review No. 96-9 A request for the co -location of a telecommunications facility by two service providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and- egress to Armitos Place. 24401 Darrin Drive Cox California PCS, Inc. 2381 Morse Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Pacific Bell Mobile Services 5959 W. Century Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90045 Eric and Robin Stone 24401 Darrin Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765 1 SIIMMaRy- The applicant is proposing the construction of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility by two service providers. This use Is conditionally permitted within the Single Family Residential (R-1) zone. The proposed antennas and equipment cabinets will be located on t e sloped area of the subject property, below street level, facing aw y from the residences.. The facility will not be visible from t e surrounding residential neighborhood and will be screened from t e view of freeway travelers. The project will not generate significant additional traffic, create noise or light, or impair views. The facilil y is required to comply with federal regulations regarding rad o frequency emissions. Staff therefore recommends approval of t e proposed telecommunications facility. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The property owners, Eric and Robin Stone, and the applicants, Cox California PCS, and Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) are requesti g approval of Conditional Use Permit #96-10 and Development Revie #96-9 This request involves the placement of three antennas arid equipment cabinets to be placed on the sloped portion of a residentially zoned parcel. This project also includes a request for An amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. This project was originally scheduled for the January 28, 19W Planning Commission meeting. Notification was sent to all property owners within a 500' radius of the subject site pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code notification requirements for conditional use permits. Because the project included a request to remove a restriction from a tract map, the City Attorney advised staff, that in addition to the customary notice, notice to all property owners within he boundaries of the tract map and within a 500' radius of t e exterior boundary of the tract would be required. Based on this determination, the project was renoticed and scheduled for the February 25, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. At that time the applicant was proposing the telecommunications facility on a barn to be located on the site's flat pad area fronting on Armit s Place. K Staff had specific concerns regarding the size and aesthetics of ti barn. it was determined that the barn would be incompatible wi the architecture of the homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The were also concerns that the barn may have partially blocked tl views of the residents on the other side of Armitos Place. As a result, the applicant requested continuance of this project lo allow time to prepare and submit an alternative design address( g these concerns. The Planning Commission granted a continuance lo the meeting of March 25, 1997. At this meeting the applicarit requested additional time to finalize the project design and preps e plans. The Planning Commission granted an additional continuance o the meeting of April 22, 1997. The site's General Plan designation is Low Density Residential (R ) and it is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-10,000). The proposc d use is conditionally permitted within this zone pursuant to tt e Planning and Zoning Code Section 22.20.100. The land uses surrounding the subject site include the Pomona Freeway (SR 60) o the north, and single family residential development to the south, eat and west. The proposed facility will be part of a national wireless Person Communication Services (PCS) telecommunication system by Cx California PCS, Inc. and Pacific Bell Mobile Services. Since the City's incorporation, eighteen (18) cell sites have bei approved within the City. Generally, these sites are located adjace to or near the freeways or heavily roadways in order to capture tl maximum number of users. This is the first cell site to be propos( within residential neighborhood, although there are facilities located Diamond Bar High School, which has a residential zoning designation APPLICATION ANALYSIS: Subject Site The subject property is an irregularly shaped lot located at ti northwest corner of Armitos Place and Darrin Drive, south of the E Freeway. The site is approximately 6.87 net acres, surrounding 25,270 square foot parcel owned by the County and occupied by fire station. 3 n e The project site is relatively flat along its Armitos Place and Darr n Drive frontage. It trends downward at an approximately 2:1 slope (at its steepest point) to a canyon and then slopes upwards towards t e northerly property boundary adjacent to the freeway. There is E n existing 1,400 square foot single family residence on the site with frontage and access on Darrin Drive. With the exception of the residence, the site is undevelope . Vegetation consists primarily of sage scrub plants typically found cn the lower slopes of the City. The site also contains scattered trees believed to be oak and walnut. These trees will be retained although two walnuts may need to be trimmed to insure adequate line -of -sight for the antennas. The subject site is Lot 51 of Tract 42584. There are easements cn the site for storm drain and storm drain ingress and egress a d public utility purposes. Additionally, there is a map restriction on t e subject property granting the County of Los Angeles (upc n incorporation this right was transferred to the City) the right o restrict vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Project Proposal The current proposal consists of three (3) antennas and equipme t cabinets. The facility is proposed on the subject site's norther y slope, facing the freeway below the undeveloped area between t e fire station and the dwelling unit. Each antennas sector consists of three (3) panel antennas measuri g 5.5' wide, 2" thick and 51" high. The antennas will be mountcd back-to-back on three separate vertical poles placed in an angled rovi, going up the slope. The first antenna (PBMS) will be plac d approximately 40' from the northerly property line adjacent to the EO Freeway. This antenna will be placed at the lowest elevation on the slope and will be 26.5.' The next antenna (Cox) is 24' and will tie placed 10' south, above of the first antenna, going up the slope. The third antenna will be placed 10' south of the second antes a and will be 22' in height. All three antennas will rise to the same height and at their highest point will be approximately level with t e flat, street level portion of the site. Within the R-1 zoning district the height limit for buildings is stories or 35.' However, these height limits don't apply conditionally permitted uses such as the proposed facility. For t 4 projects, the maximum height is determined by the hearing officer, I n this case, the Planning Commission. As proposed, the antennas will be approximately 150' from tt nearest residence and as conditioned the antennas will not be visib from the street level along Armitos Place. The antennas will k visible (although screened) from the 60 Freeway. The facility will also involve the placement of equipment cabinets on a concrete slab located south and perpendicular to the antennas. The slab will be placed into an area cut into the side of the hill a d oriented parallel to the existing contours. Retaining walls not lo exceed 6' in height will be used to accommodate the necessary cut. Each cabinet will occupy an area of 2'5' x 2'5' and will be 5' n height. The slab area will be 280 square feet in size. There will also be a coaxial cable run underground from the equipment cabinets to the antennas. The equipment cabinets will be enclosed with a 6' high chain li k fence. The antennas, equipment cabinets and other support hardwa e will be painted to match the existing vegetation. The applicant is proposing access to the site via a 15' v easement extending from the curb to concrete steps going down the equipment cabinet enclosure. Maintenance visits to the facility will be required approximately 2 time per year and will require a maximum of two hours per visit. ICSI IFS Radio Frequency Emissions/Health Impacts The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires that all cellular and PCS providers comply with safety standards for rad o frequency electromagnetic fields. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electronic Enginee s (IEEE) have established standards for safe human exposure to rad o frequency electromagnetic fields. The Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 prohibits toal governments from allowing one carrier and excluding another and ba s state and local governments from regulating facilities because of t e environmental effects of radio frequency emissions as long as faciliti comply with FCC regulations. However, that does not preclude cities from requiring that telecommunication providers submit documentation showing safely standard compliance. ' As an example, to ensure that this occurs, staff could require that the applicant submit a radio frequency radiation (RFR) field measurement study to the Planning Dlvisin verifying compliance with FCC emission standards. Locationali Criteria The design and location of telecommunication facility sites s determined by several factors. Sites must be close enough to the caller to receive the signal generated by a half -watt portable phone. Sites must be far enough from one another to eliminate cross-ta k and sites must be located away from sources of interference (i.e. til buildings, large bodies of water) which will cause signal distortion and poor communication quality. Height is one of the most important considerations when locating a site because telecommunications facilities function on a line -of -sight transmissions. Antennas must be placed at precise heights in relation to one another in order to transmit and receive signals. Therefor , topography plays a major role when determining antenna heights. Other considerations include availability of road access, electric Powe', land based telephone lines and/or microwave link capability, structural capacity for equipment and maximum coverage in the desired area with minimal sites. According to a representative from Pacific Bell Mobile Servic (PBMS), the proposed project fills a gap in cellular coverage f approximately 1/2 to 1 mile along the 60 Freeway and the adjace communities. According to this representative, the project location was chos( because it was one of the few sites which was viable from a rad frequency standpoint that had a landlord that was willing to lease PBMS. Correspondence received from PBMS (see Exhibit 1 attached) descri the alternate sites that were considered and dismissed. G Land Use Compatibility Telecommunications facilities, including antennas are conditional permitted within the Single Family Residential zone. According to the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.56.010, a conditionally permitted use is a use which, because of specific characteristics such as size, technological processes, or location, requires "special consideration" to "ensure proper integration with other existing or permitted uses in the same zone..." Condition I uses are generally approved with conditions ensuring that th s integration is achieved. Uses permitted by right in the R-1 zone are single family residence, accessory structures, such as garages, guest houses workshop , storage sheds, etc. Conditionally permitted uses in the R-1 zo e include, adult day care facilities, churches, golf courses, fire station , libraries and other uses determined to be appropriate in a residenti I zones, subject to the imposition of conditions ensuring compatibility. Land uses within the neighborhood surrounding the subject property consists of single family residences and a fire station. A land use that had the potential to increase crime, produce excessive noise or light, emitted a hazardous substance, generate excessive traffic or negatively impacted the appearance of a residential neighborhood would be considered an incompatible use. It is unlikely that the proposed use would generate or have t potential to cause additional crime within the neighborhood, becau the facility is unmanned and there will be no activities associat with this use, other than infrequent site maintenance visits. The antennas and equipment cabinets will not be lighted and will generate any noise. Health hazards are addressed by the Telecommunications Act, whic as previously stated, prohibits the City from disapprovii telecommunications facilities because of the environmental effects radio frequency emissions as long as the facilities comply with FC regulations. The proposed use will generate minimal amounts of additional t within the neighborhood. 7 Strategy 2.2.4 of the General Plan states "Require that developments be designed so at to respect the views of e; developments..." The applicant has redesigned the project, elimi the barn, because it was determined that it was incompatible size and appearance with the existing neighborhood and be neighbors had expressed a concern that the barn would block views. The proposed facility will not be visible residential neighborhood and will not block the north of the 60 Freeway. Therefore, it will not be incompatible with the existing Aesthetics W thelir from the street of the the view of the hillside to in terms of its appearan e neighborhood. The redesigned project proposes to move the antennas away from t flat pad area, to the slopes below and has proposed painting t antennas a concealing color and providing landscaped screening. T equipment cabinets are proposed to be screened by a chainlink fen painted to match the surrounding landscaping and topography. The redesigned project represents a significant aesthetic improvement over the barn. Staff has reviewed the project and is proposii several enhancements and modifications should the project approved. The first modification is to the antennas. A condition of apprm has been included requiring that the individual antenna heights reduced so that they are approximately six feet (6') below the gra of the flat pad area. This will provide additional assurance that t antennas are far enough away from the street and the residences they will not be visible when viewed from the street. To furtl- ensure that the antennas are screened, a berm will be required to created at the northerly boundary of the pad area. This berm will a minimum of 4' in height, and will be landscaped with trees 1 additional screening. e The flat pad area fronting on Armitos Place will also be required o be landscaped, enhancing its appearance and creating an amenity or the neighborhood. A condition has also been included requiring replacement of t proposed chain link fence with a block wall painted to match t '3 topography and additional landscaping along the wall as furthr screening. To screen the antennas from the freeway, trees will be required o be planted in between the antennas, in a quantity and pattern whi h creates the appearance of a natural grove. Staff believes, that the project, with the recommended conditions ill not have a negative aesthetic impact on the residential neighborhoo or have a negative visual impact when viewed from the freeway. Access Part of the original project application was a request to remove map restriction prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress on Arrr Place. Any decision to remove map restrictions must be suppo by findings that the removal is of significant benefit to the City. Vehicular access to the project site would be utilized a few times a year for maintenance of the telecommunications facility. Since the equipment cabinets and antennas are located on the slope, access toy foot would be necessary even with a driveway. On -street parking is not restricted in this area, and therefore the maintenance crews could park their trucks on the street for the limited time that service visits require. Vehicular access to the site would be of benefit solely to telecommunications service providers. Further, a curb cut on Ar Place would detract from the appearance of the. streetscape. Public Response Since the time when this project was originally advertised, staff has Environmental Quality received correspondence from neighborhood residents expressing this project will have opposition to this project in the form of a letter, and petitions which on the were submitted to the Planning Commission at the February 25, 1997 meeting and most recently received by staff on April 15, 1997 a d which are included as part of the project package as Exhibit 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality (CEQA), the City has determined that this project will have significant impact on the environment and has been determined to Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant �o Section 15303. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 7, 1997, February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. Ninety-six (96) property owners within a 500' radius of the project site were notified by mail on January 8, 1997. 494 proper y owners within a 500' radius of the exterior boundaries of Tra t 42584 were notified by mail on February 4, 1997 and April 1 1, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission appro, Conditional Use Permit 96-10, and Development Review 96-9 subje to the Conditions of Approval contained within Planning Commissis Resolution 97 -XX. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission may direct staff to prepare a resolution denial or continue the project to a date certain for further discussii REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project is in compliance with the General Plan; 2. The requested use at the location proposed will not: (a) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare persons residing or working in the surrounding area or, (b) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment r valuation of property of other persons located in t e vicinity of the of site, or (c) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace the public health, safety or general welfare; and 3. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and lo; 10 ft facilities, landscaping and other development features, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use in t e surrounding area; 4. The proposed site is adequately served: (a) By highways or streets of sufficient width and. impri as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of tr such use would generate; and (b) By other public or private service facilities as are required. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's general plan, desi n guideline of the appropriate district, and any adOptE d architectural criteria for the specialized area, such as designat d historic districts, theme area, specific plans, community plan , boulevards, or planned developments; 2. Approval of the design and layout of the proposed project compatible with the characteristics of the surroundii neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly attracti, development contemplated by Chapter 22.72 of Developme Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) and the City's General Plan; 3. The architectural design of the proposed project will unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment neighboring existing or future development and will not cr traffic or pedestrian hazards; 4. The design of the proposed project would provide a desirabl environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as it neighbors through good aesthetic use of material texture an color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the publi health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the propertie or improvements in the vicinity. 11 FINDINGS FOR REMOVAL OF MAP RESTRICTION: 1. The removal of the reap restriction is of significant benefit t the City. PREPARED BY: Catherine Johnson, Senior Planner 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97--6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-10, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-9, A REQUEST FOR CO - LOCATION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY BY COX COMMUNICATIONS AND PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES, CONSISTING OF THREE ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS. 1. The property owners, Eric and Robin Stone and the applicants, Cox Calif. PCS, Inc. and Pacific Bell Mo ile Services have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9 as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit and Development Review shall be referred t as the "Application". 2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly o:­•-,-ized municipal corporatioi of the State of California. Thereafter, the City Counci of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No 14 (1990), thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contain the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now curre tly applicable to development applications, including the subject Application, within the City of Diamond Bar. 3. On July 25, 1995, the City of. Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan. Action was taken on the subject application as to the consistency with the General Plan. It has been determined that the proposed projec is consistent with the General Plan. 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Ba on April 22, 1997 conducted a duly noticed public heari g on the Application. 5. Notification of the public hearing for this project been made in the San Gabriel ValleyTribune and Ir Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 7 1 February 4, 1997 and April 111 1997. Ninety-six property owners within a 500 foot radius of the prc site were notified by mail on January 8, 1997. property owners within a 500' radius of the extE boundaries of Tract 42584 were notified by .mai. February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. 1 has 97, 96) ect 494 for on B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar follows: I. This Planning Commission hereby specifically fii that all of the facts set forth in the Recita: Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that project identified above in this Resolution Categorically Exempt from the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereund pursuant to Section 15303 of Article 19 of Chap 3 of Division 13 of Title 14 of the California C of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically fj and determines that, having considered the recor� a whole including the findings set forth below, changes and alterations which have been incorpori into and conditioned upon the proposed project forth in the application, there is no evido before -,this Planning Commission that the pro; proposed herein wil:-� 1 --ave the potential of adverse effect on wildlife resources or the hab. upon which the wildlife depends. Based substantial evidence, this Planning Commis hereby= -rebuts the presumption of adverse eff contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of California Code of Regulations. by as as S, ne is as r, er de ds as ted set nce ect an tat .Pon .ion Cts the 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set f rth herein, this Planning Commission hereby find as follows: (a) The project relates to a developed par el, approximately 6.87 acres in size located at 24401 Darrin Drive. (b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL) . It is within the Single Family Residential (R- 1-10,000) zone. (c) Generally, the following uses surround the project site: to the north is the P mona Freeway, to the south, east and west is single family residential development. In approximately the center of the project is a separate parcel occupied by a fire statin . (d) The proposed project is a request for the co - location of a telecommunications facility by two service providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract, Map 42584, 'removing a restriction from sai Map allowing the City to prohibit vehicular ingess and egress to Armitos Place. (e) The proposed conditional use permit will not be in substantial conflict with the adopted General Plan. The General Plan provides for a variety and mix of land uses and accessory uses necessary for the health, safety, comfort and convenience of the community. The facility's operation offers a service to the community and emergency agencies. Therefore, the prop sed facility is consistent with the General Ilan and is further authorized as a conditionElly permitted use within the R--1-10,000 one pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Cde, Section 22.20.100. (f) The proposed project will not: (1) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing in the surrounding area; or (2) Be materially detrimental to the mse, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site- or _ (3) 7eopardi2e, endanger or othex-*r?se constitute a menace to public health, safety or general welfare for the following reasons; The Conditional Use Permit's approval al oras for the proposed telecommunications facili y's construction. The facility, as conditi ned complies with all City Codes and therefore loes not jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public hea th, safety or general welfare. Currently, the consensus of the scientific community maintains that the radio frequency radiation emitted and the lower frequency electromagnetic fields associated with this type of facility generally do not produce adverse health effects in hu an= because they are non -ionizing in nature and normal exposures are controlled so as not to result in thermal effects.' As such, the facility will not be detrimental to the se, enjoyment or valuation of property or persons located in the vicinity of the site. (g) The proposed site is adequate in size and s ape to accommodate development features presc ibed in this approval to integrate the use in the surrounding area. (h) The project site is adequately served: (1) By highways or streets of suffi tent width and improved as necessary to qarry 3 the kind and quantity of traffic such u$e would generate; and (2) By other' public or private servi e facilities as are required. The project site is served by Armitos Place. However, the project site, which is Lot 51 of Tract Map 42584, contains a map restriction which gives the City the authority to restrict ingress and ingress to Armitos Place. It has been determined that vehicular access to the site is not necessary and that maintenance trucks can utilize on -street parking. Uhe facility does not significantly increase vehicular traffic to and from the site. It requires only a few routine maintenance the ks with one vehicle during a one year period. Additionally, electrical and telephone service to be utilized by the facility already exists at the site. (i) The proposed project is in compliance Th Development Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) -:kjj °`The -architectural design of this project is compatible with the character :;f the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain he' harmonious, orderly and attractive developrent contemplated by Chapter 22.72 of Develop ent .-Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990). The three antennas will be approximately level with the grade of the property's level pad area and ill not be visible when viewed from the street. Additionally, berming and additional landscaping will further screen and enhance the appearance of the project site so that it ill be compatible with the neighborhood. Additionally, the antennas will be painted to match the existing landscaping and topography and additional landscaping will be added to create a naturalized grove on the slope. The equipment cabinets will be screened Y'� a block wall painted to match the surroundings and screened with landscaping. (k) The design of this project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. (j)• The proposed removal of the map restriction is not of significant benefit to the C L Y. As part of the project proposal, the applicant has requested removal of a map restriction from Tract Map 42584 which gives the city the 4 authority to restrict vehicle ingress and ingress to Armitos Place. Removing this restriction will only benefit the pro ect applicants and will provide no benefit to the City as a whole, since vehicular access to this site from Armitos Place is not needed for the improvement of traffic or circulation within the area. Therefore, the action for approval of this project does not include the removaL of the map restriction from Lot 51 of Tract Map 42584. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to plans collectively labeled as Exhibit "A' as modified, dated April 22, 1997, as submi ted and approved by the Planning Commission. (b) The site shall be maintained permanently Ln a condition which is free of debris both du ing and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement gra ted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether` during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the prop rty owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation,and disposal of solid waste from residen.tial , commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) The applicant shall comply with all State, R-1 Zone, Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division requirements. (d) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire. one year extension may be requested in writin and submitted to the City 30 days prior to xpi- ration date. (e) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the office of Diamond Bar Community Development Departent, their Affi:!,ivit of Acceptance stating tha the applicant/owner is aware of and agrees t all conditions of this grant . Further, this rant shall not be effective until the permittee pays 67 any remaining City processing fees. (f) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game.Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check, payable to the County of Los Angeles, of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game C de requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed beca se the project has more than a de minimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game anys ch fee and any fine which the Depart m nt determines to be owed. (g) Prior to final inspection of the telecommunications facility, the applicant shall submit a radio frequency radiation (R R) field measurement study to the Plann'ng Division for review and approval which verifies es compliance with FCC emission standards. he study shall be accompanied by a rep rt . descr- bi-ng �Cmm-liance with these standards in language that: can be understood by a lay person. Any costs associated with this review shall be borne by the applicant. (h) one,year-from the date of project approval and yearly, on or before each subsequent anniversary date, the applicant shall submit a certification attested to by a licensed engineer expert in the field of RF emissions, that the facilities are and have been operated within the then current applicable FCC standards for RF emissions. Any costs resulting from the review of this certifica ion shall be borne by the applicant. (i) if the wireless telecommunications faci ity approved by th'i's-esolution is operate or maintained in violation of FCC standards, said facility shall be subject to permit revocation by the Planning Commission. (j) in the event of any future maintenance problems, abandonment of use or changes in technology which render the above mentioned facility and screening structure obsolete the applicant shall, upon notification by the City of Diamond Bar, repair, replace or remov the screening structure and/or facility within 90 days. (k) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit landscaping/ fencing and irrigation lans to the Planning Division for review and 2 approval. Landscaping, incorporating the earth removed from the equipment cabinet/pad arE a, shall be provided on the flat pad area in quantities sufficient to enhance the appearar ce of the project site when viewed from the street, creating a neighborhood amenity as determined by the Planning Division. The equipment cabinets shall be enclosed by a block wail or other opaque fencing materials as approved by the Planning Division, painted to blend with the surrounding terrain nd landscaping. Landscaping shall be provided adjacent to the walls, in quantities and heights sufficient to soften the appearance of the wall and provide additional screeniiig. Trees, shall also be provided between And surrounding the antennas and shall be planted in an arrangement representing a naturalied grove of trees. Plant materials shall emphasize drought - tolerant materials and/or native species in the following sizes and types: trees; 24 inch box, 20%, 15 gallon, 80%: shrubs; 5 gallon 70%, 1 gallon (herbaceous' only) 30% In order to guarantee t rn continuing hea 1th aiid maintenahce of the landscaping the applicant shall provide a statement of surety in the form of cash, performance bond or certificate of deposit equal to 1000 of the total value of all plant materials, irrigation anid' installation'co`is which shall be posted with the City for a to - year period. All landscaping shall be installed prior to final project inspection. (1) Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Codes (i.e. 1994 editions of the Uniform Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical C de, and 1993 edition of the National Electrical Code) as well as the State Energy Code. {m) Proposed antennas shall be engineered to, 4eet wind loads of 80 m.p.h. with an exposure of 11 C. of (n) All cables or electrical conduits from the BTS cabinet or any vault, shall be insta led underground. Any new or additional electr cal service associated with this project shal be installed underground. (o) Prior to permit issuance grading plan; sho, all cut and fill quantities .and .drainage p shall be submitted to the Public W Department. 7 ring .ans )rks The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; +nd (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of t is Resolution, by certified mail to, Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond ar CA, 91765, Cox California, PCS, Inc. 2381 Mo se Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714 and Pacific Ball Mobile Services, 5959 W. Century Boulevard, os Angeles, CA 90045. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1997 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: � Joe zicy Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Ear, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22ND day of April, 1997, by the following vote.: AYES: NOr:3. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES � SS CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1, LYNDA EER(;ESS, CITY CLEIRK OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, DO ` F I�E� Y CERTIFY I ND£R PENALTY OF PERAIURY U:,iDNEF, THE LAVVS OF THE S'IA'M CF CALIECn- NIA T.4HE Fj3-p(;OINe' TO BE. A TRUE ANE: Cop_-L-,.C1'CLgY OF THE CDI2!(ANAL AS 5A::ii ki3 is KS oi" FILE IN MY OFFICt. IN wirNESS WI -179'. a=OF , I HAVE HGREiiNTO SET IMY HAND AND AFFIXED THY lOF THE CITY DAY OF DIAhI�,Oti^iJ BAR, THIS 3 OF 9 17 1,YNUA BURGESS, CITT CLFRK COMMISSIONERS: Ru z i ck a , Goldenberg, COMMISSIONERS: Schad COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 7 � YaTeA DeSte-f—an–o-,V Secretary 8 Fa g, ,Ma*US, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA N0. jZ'2— TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: June 17, 1997 REPORT DATE: June 11, 1997 FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORAT RIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNIC TION FACILITIES SUMMARY: On May G, 1997 the City Council directed the preparation of a draft urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the issuance of permits for wi eless telecommunication facilities. On May 20, 1997 the City Council received public testimony, discussed the proposal, and continued the matter to June 3, 1997. The issue before the City Council is whether or not to enact the proposed ordinance. (Continued from J ne 3, 1997) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adopti n of the urgency ordinance and direct staff as appropriate. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) — Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) _ Ordinance(s) X Other: see staff Leport attachmena Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a ma)ority vote? 415 I Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Yes _X_No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. B61anger City Manager Frank M. UsWr Assistant City Manager HEAD: James DeStefano Community Developint Director CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Diri 1 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RAT RIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUN_CATI N FACILITIES (continued from June 3, 1997) DATE: June 11, 1997 BACKGROUND: On May 6, 1997 the City Council directed the preparation of E draft urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the issuance cf permits for wireless telecommunication facilities. On May 2C, 1997 the City Council received public testimony, discussed the pr posal, and continued the matter to June 3, 1997. The June 3, 1997 discussion was postponed to June 17, 1997. The issue before the City Council is whether or not to enact the proposed ordinan e. DISCUSSION: There are presently seventeen wireless communication facilities constructed or approved within the City. Two applications are pending to upgrade or expand facilities at existing sites (Radisson Hotel, Torito Lane office building). Development applications are in process for proposed facilities at two new locations (Dar in Drive, Peterson Park). In addition, Metricom has submitted proposal to utilize existing street light poles for a wireles data communications service. Inquires and applications continue regarding the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities within the City of Diamond Bar. The City does not presently have coordinated or detailed requirements responding to issues related to the placement, location, and design of such facilities. Project applications are reviewed on a dase by case basis. All applications for wireless telecommunication facilities require Development Review approval and most require Conditional Use Permit approval, however, there are no standards or guidelines responding to this rapidly growing land use. The City is currently in the process of preparing a comprehensive Development Code, scheduled for adoption in December 1997, which will in lude regulations addressing the placement of these facilities. Te proposed Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council June 11, 1997 page 2 interim ordinance would guide the development of wireless telecommunication facilities for the City until such time as amendments to the existing Zoning Ordinance are adopted and effective. The proposed interim ordinance, as crafted, would prohibit consideration of all four pending aplications and any new proposal for wireless facilities until such time as a new ordinance i adopted and effective. The City Council may wish to examine the effect the proposed ordinance will have upon the five pendilLg projects (see map exhibit for listing and location). Exemptions include the construction of facilities for which approval wa received, and made effective, prior to the establishment of the proposed ordinance. In accordance with Section 65858 of the Government Code the.Urgency ordinance requires approval by a four-fifths vote of the Cit Council. The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption. Upon conclusion of a noticed public hearing the Council may, by a four- fifths vote, extend the interim ordinance. The City Attorney and staff have prepared the attached draft urgency ordinance as a result of comments and direction received at the City Council meeting of May 6, 1997. The Council may consider and modify the proposed urgency ordinance as deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of the urgency ordinance and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments TB/JDS:dbm - Proposed Urgency Ordinance - Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Map ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTAELISHI ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS Co -NG :fG A MOTORI'.JI►! FACILITIES AND DECI."ING TBE URGENCY THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FOLLOWS.- Sectien i. nadi m . A. wireless telecommunications is a rapidly gr, and developing technology that has led to a significant dei for wireless communication towers, ant and facilities within the city of DiamowMasp related equip] Presently seventeen wireless telecommunication facilities constructed or approved within the City of Diamond Bar, inc both monopole facilities and roof -mounted. .facilities: B. The City presently requires development approval for every proposed wireless talecommunicaroval is required fax �igriculturan face In addition conditional use permit app wireless communication facility applications proposed with! l., Residential, and certain Commercial and Indus zones. Wireless telecommunication facilities and toners ar permitted by right within the Restricted Heavy Manufacturin zons. The City does not have any detailed standards to pro regulate and control the location, placement, and design of facilities; C. Due to evolving technology and changes in fs regulations in the winless communications industry, the do far new and modified wfreless communication facilities will continue to occur and proliferate within the near future; D. Evolving technology and transmittinq needs hi resulted in continuing changes and adaptations in the dosigs appearance of wireless cOlMUnication facilities, and these Circumstances have created a need to study the type of wire] communication facilities that are anticipated to be proposee their inputs on the eoamunity, and. to further determine hay these !ae#lities may best be regulated and controlled to pry the public health, safety, and welfare within the limits of current State and Federal laws and regulations; E• One of the stated goals of the Diamond ear Ge Plan is to assure an appropriate balance of land uses with resthepect to the adoptio adoption hisiordinance willand serveeatotadv adOf vance e t:ivoatVaJuwsqMT 'AIN AS wing and ant lading ew all L ;rial• erl y such and and the achievement of this goal as well as Other goals of General plan; F. Based on the statements cited Council believss that the current zoningre above, the Ci y provide sufficient standards to properly relations do no wireless communication facilities; and that a need th late and cont o2 exists to develop a new comprehensive tharefo e wireless communication facilities ordice to ensure and screened properly located, designed construction' and operatproper canditacilities; g ion Ofsuch Placed on the modified rrGrelessnsidertion of communication facilities applications for net Of such an ordinance could result in n Psion to the ado tion otherwise be avoided or be more effective1ivs impacts that therefore. consideration of further a y mitigated, and ight discontinued until such time as a PPljcationa should be nay► ordinance is adopted; �. Based on the statements cited Council finds that the current absence of controls�onhteheid si and construction of wireless communication facilities immediate threat to the public heaith, satet poses ani that the establishment of new And modified wirele scoaununic do facilities would result in that threat to the public health safety, and welfare; n r 1. the a moratorium onrnew and modifieentdowirelessthe City Council to estab ish facilities by means of adopting this ordinanceuascaniinterim urgency ordinance pursuant to the provisions a Dove Section only u It is intended that this moratorium remain Code de effect only until such time as other a may be studied, considered,and adopted,rmanent zoning measur s SEctierE * declarea- provided in Section 4 hereof, ,the City Of DiamondBarherb j declares a moratorium on the the of building permits, Y grading he use changes, and any other developments permits variances, zona the use, development or modificationefaita aand sn�o�em°nts f facilitiOs Within the city, unicatio tie� a. proviSecMML ded geCtlotl 4 hereof, notwithstand3 gcany atheonc�rdirsi ca or coda o! th! City of Diamond Bar, no a por'n't, �diW PaMit, demolition t, Conditional for a buil inq permit, variance, Zone change, development conditional use or entitleaant for establishment, davalo permit or other pe it modilicatzon of wireless communication facilities shall be accepted, PrOcotal.- sed or issued: no environmental.assassmant, environmental.- report, negative declaration se cat exemption shall be prepared in connection with any such categoric 1 L:\V0L1\MADG1MAT -2- application, permit or entitlement; and no building, struct re, or facility shall be constructed, reconstructed, establishe , erected or placed during the term of the moratorium declarel in Section 2 hereof. For purposes of this ordinance, a "Wirel ss communication facility* is defined as a structure that supports commercial antennae, microwave dishes and/or other related equipment that sands and/or receives radio frequency signals, whether mounted on the ground or on any portion of a structitre or building. Ssctign 4. Exemptions. The moratorium or limits on Provided for in sections.2 and 3 hereof shall not be applic Is to any of the following: (a) Repairs or maintenance of existing struc or facilities within the original footprint of th existing facilities and which do not increase the facility size or height; (b) Establishment or construction of facilities for which final approval was received by the Pla ing Commission or the Community Development Director and effective prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; (c) Minor modifications'to an existing strutura or facility required by lav to be constructed in rder for the structure or facility to comply with appl cable fire, building or other safety requirements. Nothing' contained in this section shall exempt or except any exempt construction or use from any requirement cr regulation of the Building Code, Zoning Ordinance, or other ordinance of the city of Diamond Bar. In the event that wo k is permitted to proceed under the terms of this ordinance, all required permits shall be posted on site. Section 5. Severability. It any part or provisi n.of this Ordinance, or the applicatioA•to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be effected and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Ordi ance are severable. Sion fi. Penalty. violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall bo Punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in County jail for not to exceed six (6) months, or by both suchL fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation Vhis ordinance. In addition to the foregoing, any violation ofs -3- Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided by all applicable provisions of aw. StatgMent-of-purposo the As set forth i�findings contained in Section ingy above, dthes. City of Diamond Har intends to conduct studies forthwith a,s to appropriate standards and regulations governing wireless communication facilities, and, if appropriate, to prepare and adopt amendments to the zoning ordinance regarding same. Fending such studies, and the preparation and adoption of the ante ded zoning regulations, it is necessary for -the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare that no new or expanded wireless communication facilities be constructed or developed and that this ordinance take eff t immediately. if this ordinance does not take effect immediately, wireless communication facilities will be undertaken which may in conflict with the zoning regulations which are to be studied and adopted as above mentioned, incompatible with proposed uses of adjacent property, and detrimental to the proper planning of the community. Due to the foregoing circumstances, there is a c and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and wel The approval of additional land use permits, variances, bu grading or demolition permits, or any other applicable entitlement for construction or modification of wireless communication facilities would result'in a threat to the P health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, it is necessary f preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welf& this ordinance take effect immediately. This ordinance is interim ordinance and shall expire forty-five {45} days af, adoption thereof unless extended pursuant to the provision Section 65858 of the Government Code. This is an interim measure, adopted pursuant to authorization of Stats law in order to maintain the status Pending the completion of the studies and adoption of amen zoning regulations, or sooner. It is not a final disposit to development of anY particular parcel of property within City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1 ATTEST: CITY CLERK -4- LAvoLtvu\o r MAYOR irrent !are. llding, tblic it the 'e that an :er the of he qua ed on as the P.-35 Consulting Group, Inc. June 11, 1997 Mr. Bob Huff, Mayor and Council Members City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Coply Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 Re: Responses to City Council -Queries Hillside Telecommunication Facility 24401 Darrin Drive Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: i This is a response to queries- of the City Council pertaining to physical placement and design of the telecommunication facility proposed to be located on the north facing hillside along Armitos Place and lying west oft e residence at 24410 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA in a R-1 zone. Q-1: What is the desired height of the antenna? A-1: The antenna will be two (2) feet below the existing flattened pad ff Armitos Place. Two antennas owned by Cox will be placed directly east of the level and they will have heights of 19 feet and 22 feet. One antenna owned by Pacific Bell Mobile Systems, (PBMS) will located farthest from the flattened pad will have a height of 24 feet. Q-2: What is the precise location of the antenna? A-2: The antenna will be placed at the elevations shown on the applicai site plan. Their exact location will be per the plans and will be locat pursuant to citing by a licensed civil engineer / surveyor. The mid( (Cox, 22`) and the most easterly (PBMS) poles will be within t southeast spread of the existing walnut tree located down slope frc the flattened pad. This placement requires the trimming is of Page 2 Mayor and Council Members 24401 Darrin Drive approximately five to seven feet off the top of this tree. The tree will be maintained at a height of approximately 16 feet above the ground. Q-3: What color of gravel will be used for the foot path around the antenna and equipment enclosure? A-3: There will be no gravel. Instead we will use pressure treated, green colored wood beams. These beams will be placed in the earth to provide a sturdy naturalized step path around the antenna and along the side of the equipment enclosure. Q-4: What is the boundary of the lease area? A-4: The lease references the site plan as the use area. The boundary of the initial lease area has been increased to inscribe the telecommunication facility improvements and landscaping area as shown on the revised landscaping drawings. This area is delineated on Sheet A-1, Location Plan, of the architectural drawings. Q-5: What is the term of the lease? A-5: The Lease has an initial terra of five (5) years. Cox has the right to extend the Term for five (5) additional periods of five (5) years each. Pacific Bell Mobile Systems has a similar lease. Also, both Cox and PBMS have the right to terminate their lease at any time. Q-6: What degree of trimming will be done to the trees surrounding the antenna? A-6: As noted above, the trees adjacent to the antenna will be trimmed five to seven feet. In this manner the antenna may transmit without interference and the companies will be able to maintain the height by pruning on a biannual basis. Q-7: Does the lease constitute a subdivision of land? A-7: The lease with the property owner defines the use of the property as an easement for telecommunication purposes. No specific leased land Page 4 Mayor and Council Members 24401 Darrin Drive currently have partial views of the mock equipment enclosure antenna. A windshield and pedestrian reconnaissance of the area was made. It revealed that views from the streets were not visible because homes and foreground features such as the flattened pad block any direct vie of the mock facility. With regards to views from the sidewalk along Armitos Place, a parti il view of the mock antenna poles is visible from the sidewalk just we 5t of Mr. Stone's residence. Plant materials along the property edge eliminate this view. Views from the residences along the opposite si e of Armitos Place will be completely shielded with the installation f the three to four foot high berm and plants. Landscaping plans reflect an upscale design for this neighborhood. Examination of the potential for views from the front yards oft e homes along the opposite side of Armitos Place revealed that while the homes sites and floor levels are higher than the subject anten a location, the views are not visible because the angle -of -view is interrupted by the flattened pad and will be completely shielded wi h the installation of the three to four foot high berm and plants. Upon completion the plants in their design will be a tranquil setting that should be effective in establishing a nice impression. Examination of the views from the residences along Darrin Dri e revealed these properties look down and across. Partial views are available from their rear fences. Persons must look over their fence to see downwards. The distance from the rear of the properties limits visibility. Brush and sloping terrain block views. Views from second story windows are blocked by distant objects such as fences, existing plantings and down sloping terrain. In locations whE re partial views are visible the camouflage and distance will lessen t e awareness to a level of acceptability. These home sites are over 300 feet away from the antenna. The visiblity of a camouflage painted 10" wide 50" long three antenna panels extending six to eight feet above the t p of shrubs needs to be sought and focused. Or lost. Views from the freeway are restricted. The degree of planting arou d the antenna, its camouflage paint and extended distance from he Page 3 Mayor and Council Members 24401 Darrin Drive mentioned. In this manner the owner is not precluded from using the land for any other purpose nor does the lease create a lot by meets and bounds. Q-8: Can we provide a precise landscaping plan? A-8: A precise landscaping plan has been prepared. The plan shows placement of trees, shrubs, ground covers, fencing, earthen berm and telecommunication facilities. Plant materials are drought tolerant. All planting areas shall be provided with a permanent irrigation system. The plan shows a three to four foot earth berm on top of the flattened pad, location of the antenna, equipment enclosure, electric metering pedestal, wood fence and pedestrian areas. Plants are shown to reflect an upscale pattern consistent with residential uses in the surrounding area. Plants are positioned to shield views of the facility from Armitos Place. Plants placed around the antenna shield views from the freeway. Q-9: What will the electrical meter pedestal look like? A-9: The electrical meter pedestal is a metal clad cabinet and houses the electrical and other such meters providing service to the facility. It is approximately handrail height (36") and measures two feet square. A set of specification will be provided separately. The color is institutional gray with a beige tone. This earthen coloring is chosen as it is characteristically a blending color for this setting. To ensure aesthetic computability with the neighboring homes the electrical meter will be located at the northwest corner of the site adjacent and east of the existing pine tree adjacent to the Fire Station. In this manner the pedestal is below the sidewalk grade. Wooden steps will be placed in the earth to provide an all weather path for meter reader people. Q-10: Will the facility be visible from any of the residences? A-10: Yes. Some of the residences lying southwest along the opposite side of Armitos Place and southeast with €rontage on Darrin Drive, may Page 5 City Council Queries 24401 Darrin Drive freeway edge mitigate the impression of the facility to a level insignificance. The use of pressure treated wooden steps and Bart tone equipment enclosure fencing surrounded by shrubs and t: mitigate the impression that these features even exist. The applicants will be in attendance at the site at 5:30 p.m. Tuesday, June 1997 to answer questions and provide information on the modified design. Sincerely, /J1im Ma uez, Senior Planner ': cc, J. cHaddad, Caraway for PBMS CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: TERRENCE L. BELANGER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CALL FOR REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANN COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9) DATE: JUNE 3, 1997 SUMMARY: On May 6, 1997 the City Council voted to call for review the decision of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. The issue before the City Council is whether r not to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission, BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted public hearings for the prop, on January 28, 1997, February 25, 1997, March 25, 1997 and � 22, 1997. On April 22, 1997 the Planning Commission completed public hearing approving CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9 by a 4 to 1 r and adopting Resolution No. 97-6. The Planning Commission approval permits the construction of a wireless telecommunications facility on a site adjacent to and below Armitos Place. As proposed, the facility will consist of equipment cabinets and antennas, all located below the street, not visible from Armitos Place, designed with landscaping and screening to blend in the hillside site as viewed from above and the Pomona Freeway. lo On May 6, 1997 the City Council voted to call for review tl decision of the Planning Commission approving CUP 96-10 and 1 96-9. Councilman Harmony requested that the Planning Commission decision be called up for review as. outlined within Section 22.60.2( of the Planning and Zoning Code. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT E; AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: June 3, 1997 REPORT DATE: May 28, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Call for review of the decision of the Planning Commission to approve a proposed wireless telecommunications facilty located at 24401 Darrin Drive, (CUP 96-10 and DR 96-9) SUMMARY: On May 6; 1997 the City Council voted to call for review the decision of the Planning Commission approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-10 and Development Review (DR) 96-9 for the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility at 24401 Darrin Drive. The issue before the City Council is whether or not to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of the Planning Commission and direct staff as appropriate. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Resolution(s) Ordinance(&) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Applicants SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: — Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification X Other: (see staff report attachments) 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A _ Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? PLANNING COMMISSION 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Be ger City Manager Frank M. Usher • JarfiA DeStefano Assistant City Manager Community Develop nt Director Memorandum to the City Council June 3, 1997 Page 2 Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.60.40, notifice of the City Council hearing was made in the San Gabriel V; Tribune on May 13, 1997 and in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin May 14, 1997. Approximately 275 property owners within a c radius of the exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 were notified of public hearing by mail on May 14, 1997. At the request of the City Council the applicant has constructed dimensional mock-up of the proposed telecommunications facility the subject site, which can be viewed by the Council and mem of the public. Pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code 22.60.250 upon initiatinc call for review, the City Council may affirm the action of Planning Commission, refer the matter back to the Commission further review, or take any action that in the opinion of the Coun is indicated by the evidence. The City Council's decision rr address all aspects of the project, including the addition or deletion any conditions. Once a decision is made, the Council shall dire staff to develop a resolution with the appropriate findings to brought back to the next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the decision of Planning Commission and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 22, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-6 Approved Development Plans Minutes of the City Council Meeting of May 6, 1997 Minutes of Planning Commission Meetings of January 28, 1 February 25, 1997, March 25, 1997 and April 22, 1997. Letter dated. April 29, 1997 from Councilman Harmony Petitions from Residents dated 2/25/97 and 4115/97 First Amendment to the CC&R's for Tract 42584 2 tion lley on the 3 on :rs F7 of be City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Re ort AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1 REPORT DATE: April 16, 1997 MEETING DATE: April 22, 1997 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 96-1 Development Review No. 96-9 APPLICATION REQUEST: A request for the co -location of telecommunications facility by tv service providers on a residentia property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584 removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and- egress to Armitos Place. PROPERTY LOCATION: 24401 Darrin Drive APPLICANTS: Cox California PCS, Inc. 2381 Morse Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Pacific Bell Mobile Services 5959 W. Century Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90045 PROPERTY OWNERS: Eric and Robin Stone 24401 Darrin Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765 1 SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing the construction of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility by two service providers. This use is conditionally permitted within the Single Family Residential (R-1) zone. The proposed antennas and equipment cabinets will be located on the sloped area of the subject property, below street level, facing away from the residences. The facility will not be visible from the surrounding residential neighborhood and will be screened from the view of freeway travelers. The project will not generate significant additional traffic, create noise or light, or impair views. The facility is required to comply with federal regulations regarding radio frequency emissions. Staff therefore recommends approval of the proposed telecommunications facility. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The property owners, Eric and Robin Stone, and the applicants, Cox California PCS, and Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) are requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit #96-10 and Development Review #96-9 This request involves eplacement l m the osl ped three porton asofand a equipment cabinets placed on residentially zoned parcel. This project also includes a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. This project was originally scheduled for the .January 28, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. Notification was sent to all property owners within a 500' radius notificativnthe requbrementssite fopursuant condivonal use Planning and Zoning Code permits. Because the project included a request to remove a restriction from a tract map, the City Attorney advised staff, that in addition to the customary atra t notice,notice nanlde within h'n aall ro500Y radius oWithin the he boundaries of th exterior boundary of the tract would be required. Based on this determination, the project was renoticed and scheduled for the February 25, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. At that time the applicant was proposing the telecommunications facility on a barn to be located on the site's flat pad area fronting on Armitos Place. 01 Staff had specific concerns regarding the size and aesthetics of barn. It was determined that the barn would be incompatible i the architecture of the homes in the surrounding neighborhood. Ti were also concerns that the barn may have partially blocked views of the residents on the other side of Armitos Place. the Pith ere As a result, the applicant requested continuance of this project to allow time to prepare and submit an alternative design addressing these concerns. The Planning Commission granted a continuance to the meeting of March 25, 1997. At this meeting the applicant requested additional time to finalize the project design and prepare plans. The Planning Commission granted an additional continuance to the meeting of April 22, 1997. The site`s General Plan designation is Low Density Residential (11L) and it is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-10,000). The proposed use is conditionally permitted within this zone pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code Section: 22.20.100. The landu es surrounding the subject site include the Pomona Freeway (SR SO) to the north, and single family residential development to ri,e south, a st and west. The proposed facility will be part of a national wireless Pers o al Communication Services (PCS) telecommunication system by C x California PCS, Inc. and Pacific Bell Mobile Services. Since the City's incorporation, eighteen (1 S) cell sites have be( approved within the City. Generally, these sites are located adjace to or near the freeways or heavily roadways in order to capture V maximum number of users. This is the first cell site to be s within residential neighborhood, although there are facilities located ; Diamond Bar High School, which has a residential zoning designation. APPLICATION ANALYSIS: Subject Site The subject property is an irregularly shaped lot located at th northwest corner of Armitos Place and Darrin Drive, south of the E Freeway. The site is approximately 6.87 net acres, surrounding 25,270 square foot parcel owned by the County and occupied by fire station. 3 0 The project site is relatively flat along its Armitos Place and Darrin Drive frontage. It trends downward a onward tltiennapproximately s opes upwards2:1 slope (at towa ds he its steepest pont) to a Y There is an northerly property boundary adjacent to the freeway. existing 1,400 square foot single family residence on the site with frontage and access on Darrin Drive. is With the exception of the eof residence, nscrubthplants site undeveloped. found on Vegetation consists primarily sage the lower slopes of the City. The site also contains scattered trees be believed to be oak and walbet•These trimmed to trees ill el adequate retainedalthough two walnuts may need to for the antennas. The subject site is Lot 51 of Tract 42584. There are easements on the site for storm drain and storm drain ingress and egress and public utility purposes.nt ndditi��e Ily'there County sa Map of Los restriction Angeles on the (upon subject property granting incorporation this right was transferred to the City) the right to restrict vehicular ingress and egress to Armitas Place. Project Pro osal The current proposal consists of three (3) antennas and equipment cabinets. The facility is proposed the on the undevelapedect area betweenerly the slope, facing the free y fire station and the dwelling unit. Each antennas sector consists of three (3) panel antennas measuring 5.5' wide, 2" thick and 51" high. The antennas will be mounted an back-to-back on three separatevertfirst aipes ntenna placedin will angled placed going up the slope. approximately 40' from the northerly property line adjacent to the 60 Freeway. This antenna will be placed at the lowest elevation on the slope and will be 26'5.1 enext che first antenna antenna, going of p andwill wslope placed 10' south, above of The third antenna will be placed 10' south of the second antenna and will be 22' in height. All three antennas will rise to the same height and at their highest point will be approximately level with the flat, street level portion of the site. Within the R-1 zoning district the height limit for buildings is two stories or 35.' However, these height limits don't apply to conditionally permitted uses such as the proposed facility. For these 4 projects, the maximum height is determined by the hearing officer, this case, the Planning Commission. As proposed, the antennas will be approximately 150' from nearest residence and as conditioned the antennas will not be vis from the street level along Armitos Place. The antennas will visible (although screened) from the 60 Freeway. The facility will also involve the placement of equipment cabinets a concrete slab located south and perpendicular to the antennas. slab will be placed into an area cut into the side of the hill oriented parallel to the existing contours. Retaining walls not exceed 6' in height will be used to accommodate the necessary c Each cabinet will occupy an area of 2'5' x 2'5' and will be, 5' height. The slab area will be 280 square feet in size. There also be a coaxial cable run underground from the equipment cabin to the antennas. in )ie be on rid to it. in fill The equipment cabinets will be enclosed with a 6' high chain Ink fence. The antennas, equipment cabinets and other support hardw re will be painted to match the existing vegetation. The applicant is proposing access to the site via a 15' wi e easement extending from the curb to concrete steps going downtc the equipment cabinet enclosure. Maintenance visits to the facility will be required approximately time per year and will require a maximum of two hours per visit. ISSUES Radio Frequency Emissions/Health Impacts The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires that cellular and PCS providers comply with safety standards for rac frequency electromagnetic fields. The American National Standar Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electronic Enginec (IEEE) have established standards for safe human exposure to rac frequency electromagnetic fields. -3 ill 1� The Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 prohibits local governments from allowing one carrier and excluding another and ba -s state and local governments from regulating facilities because of the 5 environmental effects of radio frequency emissions as long as facilities comply with FCC regulations. However, that does not preclude cities from requiring that telecommunication providers submit documentation showing safety standard compliance. As an example, to ensure that this occurs, staff could require that the applicant submit a radio frequency radiation (RFR) field measurement study to the Planning Division verifying compliance with FCC emission standards. locational Criteria cility is The design and location of S'rtesmustbe telecommunication ckoseaenough ito the determined by several factors• caller to receive the signal generated by a half -watt portable phone. Sites must be far enough from from sourne ces of interference to eliminate toe. tail and sites must be located away buildings, large bodies of water) which will cause signal distortion and poor communication quality. Height is one of the most important considerations when locating a site because telecommunications facilities at unction on a p precise heightslinre-°ela f-sgon ht transmissions. Antennas must be p to one another in order to transmit. and receive signals. Therefore, topography plays a major role when determining antenna heights. Other considerations include availability of road access, electric power, land based telephone lines and/or microwave coverageerage in the c arerala capacity for equipment and maximum with minimal sites. e Services According to a representative filo a gPacific Bell ° coverage for (DBMS), the proposed project 9 long the 60 Freeway and the adjacent approximately 112 to t mile a communities. According to this representative, sites which projectlocation vaaible f om a radio was chosen because it was one of the frequency standpoint that had a landlord that was willing to lease to PBMS. Correspondence received from PBMS (see Exhibit 1 attached) describes the alternate sites that were considered and dismissed. Cel Strategy 2.2.4 of the General Plan states "Require that developments be designed so at to respect the views of e; developments..." The applicant has redesigned the project, elimi the barn,. because it was determined that it was incompatible size and appearance with the existing neighborhood and bt neighbors had expressed a concern that the barn would block views. The proposed facility will not be visible from the street of residential neighborhood and will not block the view of the hillsid the north of the 60 Freeway. Therefore, in terms of its appear it will not be incompatible with the existing neighborhood. Aesthetics The redesigned project proposes to move the antennas away from flat pad area, to the slopes below and has proposed painting antennas a concealing color and providing landscaped screening. equipment cabinets are proposed to be screened by a chainlink fi painted to match the surrounding landscaping and topography. new ting sting I its ause their the to ince the the The ;nce The redesigned project represents a significant aesthetic improvement over the barn. Staff has reviewed the project and is prop sing several enhancements and modifications should the project be approved. The first modification is to the antennas. A condition of approval has been included requiring that the individual antenna heights be reduced so that they are approximately six feet {6'} below the g ade of the flat pad area. This will provide additional assurance that the antennas are far enough away from the street and the residences so they will not be visible when viewed from the street. To further ensure that the antennas are screened, a berm will be required to be created at the northerly boundary of the pad area. This berm will be a minimum of 4' in height, and will be landscaped with trees for additional screening. The flat pad area fronting on be landscaped, enhancing its the neighborhood. Armitos Place will also be require to appearance and creating an amenity for A condition has also been included requiring replacement of proposed chain link fence with a block wall painted to match H. the the Land Use Compatibility Telecommunications facilities, including antennas are conditionally permitted within the Single Family Residential zone. According to the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.56.010, a conditionally permitted use is a use which, because of specific characteristics such as size, technological processes, or location, requires "special consideration" to "ensure proper integration with other existing or permitted uses in the same zone..." Conditional uses are generally approved with conditions ensuring that this integration is achieved. Uses permitted by right in the R-1 zone are single family residences, accessory structures, such as garages, guest houses workshops, storage sheds, etc. Conditionally permitted uses in the R-1 zone include, adult day care facilities, churches, golf courses, fire stations, in a libraries and other uses determined etia of to be conditions roensu�ing compatibility. zones, subject to the imposition Land uses within the neighborhood surrounding the subject property consists of single family residences and a fire station. A land use that had the potential to increase crime, produced excessive noise or light, emitted a. hazardous substance, generated excessive traffic or negatively impacted the appearance of a residential neighborhood would be considered an incompatible use. it is unlikely that the proposed use would generate or have the potential to cause additional crime within the neighborhood, because the facility is unmanned and there will be no activities associated with this use, other than infrequent site maintenance visits. The antennas and equipment cabinets will not be lighted and will not generate any noise. Health hazards are addressed yhe � Telecommunications Yuni #�om s Actdisapproving , as previously stated, prohibits telecommunications facilities because of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions as long as the facilities comply with PCC regulations. The proposed use will generate minimal amounts of additional traffic within the neighborhood. 7 Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant Section 15303. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION to Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bul etin newspapers on January 7, 1997, February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. Ninety-six (96) property owners within a 500' radius of the project site were notified by mail on January 8, 1997. 494 property owners within a 500' radius of the exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 were notified by mail on February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission apps Conditional Use Permit 96-10, and Development Review 96-9 suk to the Conditions of Approval contained within Planning Commis Resolution 97 -XX. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONS: ME The Planning Commission may direct staff to prepare a resolutionof denial or continue the project to a date certain for further discussi n. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project is in compliance with the General Plan; 2. The requested use at the location proposed will not: (a) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare persons residing or working in the surrounding area or, (b) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment valuation of property of other persons located in vicinity of the of site, or (c) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace the public health, safety or general welfare; and 3. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loac 10 of �or he to to ing topography and additional landscaping along the wall as further screening• frm the trees will be required to To screen the antennasbetween the oantennasn a freeway, quantity and pattern which be planted m creates the appearance of a natural grove. ommended conditions will Staff believes, that the project, with the rec not have a negative aesthetic impact on the reside#romnthe fre'ewaY ghborhood, or have a negative visual impact when viewed Access the original project application was a request to remove the of Part vehicular ingress and egress on Armitos map restriction prohibiting supported Place. Any decision to remove map restrictions must be by findings that the removal is of significant benefit to the City. Vehicular access to the project site would be utilized a few times t`s fac' Sincethe year for maintenance of the nteleas a are located thesiope, access by equipment cabinets and a even with a driveway. On -street parking is foot would be necessary uld not restricted in this area, and therefore the maintenance timethat service visits park their trucks on the street for the limited require. Vehicular access to the site would be of benefit solely to the Veh� telecommunications service providers• Further, scurb eetscape n Arm'tas Place would detract from the appearance Public Response neighborhood residents expressing Since the time when this project was priginally advertised, staff as 5 from neighb received correspondence petitions which opposition to this project in the form of a letter. and P 25, 1997 were submitted to the Planning Commissionat the ArilFebruary 997 and meeting and most recently received by which are included as part of the project package as Exhibit 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: will have no Act Pursuant to the terms of the Cdalifornia that this project Environmental Quality (CEQA), the City has determine California ant impact on the environment and has been determined to be 9 FINDINGS FOR REMOVAL OF MAP RESTRICTION: 1. The removal of the map restriction is of significant benefit to the City. PREPARED BY: Catherine Johnson, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Application Plans Exhibit 1 - Correspondence from Pacific Bell Mobile Services Exhibit 2 - Resident's petitions Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 96- 0, Development Review 96-9 12 facilities, landscaping and other development features, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use in the surrounding area; 4. The proposed site is adequately served: (a) By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate; and (b) By other public or private service facilities as are required. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's general plan, design guideline of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for the specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme area, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments; oject is 2. Approval of the design he acharacteristics d layout of thof prop�oeseds�p surrounding compatible with neighborhood and will maintaintChapterharno22 nious72 oferly attractive De eiopment development contemplated by Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) and the City's General Plan; 3. The architectural design of the proposed project will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 4. The design of the proposed project would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of material will tyre retain color that will remain aesthetically appealing and reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 11 FILE No. 162 04/16 '97 12:36 ID: FA111BITY Pacific Bell Mobile Services History of Candidate Search -- Search Ring LA -462-00 Pacific Bell Mobile Services' proposed antenna facility at 24401 Darrin Drive (T_A-462-02) is part of the company's wireless PCS network in the LA basin. It is designed to cover approximately one mile of hilly terrain of the 60 Freeway and the adjacent communities. Connecting sites include I.A-208 located at 2 Rancho Road in Pomona and site LA -211 located at 249 Gentle Springs Lane in Diamond Bar. The Darren Drive project fills what would otherwise be a coverage hole for approximately 112 to I mile along the 60 Freeway and the adjacent cornmut ties. PBMS' contract site acquisition team pursued a number of options before ultimately leasing and submitting for land use approval the Darrin Drive site. LA County Fire Station #121 at 346 Armitos Place: The Fire Station was the primary candidate. When approached in lviarch, 1996, with a request to Iease space for a communications site, the Fire Department declined, citing conflict of interest because the Fire Department was in negotiations with PBMS for use of microwave links. Carlton Peterson Park (North Side of Freeway): The park was considered by PBMS' contract site acquisition tears. However, because of the topography (hills) blocking a Portion of freeway, it was ruled out as not viable from a radio frequency standpoint. Vacant Lots (Residential)- PBMS' contract site acquisition team contracted two institutional owners of residentially -zoned that abuts the 60 Freeway. Both landlords declined to eater into a lease agreement with PBMS. One of the parcels is owned by the City of Industry. Curl Burnett representing the City, Tndustry declined to lease to PBMS, saying the City did not wish to encumber the property and inhibit future development. Another parcel is owned by the Pomona Unified School District. Joann Lemig and Ron Young, representing the District mentioned the landlord had plans for the property and there would be no interest in teasing to PBMS liar the foreseeable future. 24401 Darrin Drive: This location was chosen because of it is one of the few sites viable from a radio frequency standpoint that will provide coverage to the area and had a landlord willing to lease to PBMS. The property was leased and submitted for land use approval because two small antennas could be mounted atop a single post with minimal visual impact to the surrounding area. 1 2. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAY 6, 1997 CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m., AQMD Rooms CC -3 & 5 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (G.C. S PROPERTY: Former Water District property, Brea Canyon Road north of Pathfinder Road NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LLA UNDER NEGOTIATION: ADJOURNMENT: p.m. City of Diamond Bar and Diamond C Material terms of the agreement Mayor Huff adjourned the Closed CALL TO ORDER: , Mayor Huff called the meeting to or p.m., in the SCAQMD Auditorium, 21$65 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Herrera. INVOCATION: Diamond Bar The Pledge of Allegiance was led Pastor Rick Motz, Evangelical Free ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Harmony, Mayor Pro Tem Herrera and Mayor Huff. Also present were. Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Frank Ushe Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; James DeStefan, Community Development Director; George Wentz, Public Works Directc Bob Rose, Community Services Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 54956.$): !rly side of st Estates :)n at 6:15 ?r at 6:37 :alifomia. Pro Tem hurch of Werner, In regard to the Closed Session held earlier, CA/Jenkins announced that Council gave direction to the City Manager to extend negotiations with Diamo d Crest Estates LLA. 3. SPECIAL P ESENTATIONS, CERTIFIC TES, PROCLAMATIONS: 3.1 mmendaation presented to rls Tuinel, Dallas Cowboys # for gi time and resources to the D Pop Warner Football and C rleadin 3. Commendation presen d to the D.B. Pop W er Foot Cheerleading Assn. f heir continued activities to rd D.B. you 3.3 PROCLAMATIONS: 3.3.1 Proclaimed ay, 1997 as "Water Aware ss Month". 3.3.2 Proclaim May, 1997 as "Bicycle App ciation Month". ng his Assn. and MAY 6, 1997 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL /respe to MPT/Herrera, CMBelanger xplained that staffs understood ia will direct staff to prepare Urgency Ordinance, the perp eould be to establish a mor rium on these types of facilitie ntil that permanent guid ices, standards an/le n be through the Dev . pm Code procesency Ordinance would be agendiz for discussion and possThe Ordinance would be effe a upon adoption by the ption requires a super majora ffrmative vote by four of fivebers. Following dis to prepare a issuance of commercial I Ordinance Motion c ie ACM -mer moved, C/Ansari seAnded, to direct staff rgency Ordinance es#ablishi a moratorium on the far telecommunications eaZDmerit and antennas for rdinance (not an Urgency "lar May 20, 1997 meeting. OFposes and to prepare a ar Council's consideration at its by the following Roll Call 0 A/SE COUNCIL MEMBERS - nsari, Harmony, Wer MPT/Herrera, M/Huff N COUNCIL MEMBE - None A: COUNCIL MEMB S - None 9.8 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO REVIEW THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO. APPROVE A PROPOSED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (CUP 96-10 AND DR 96-9). Don Schad suggested that Council read the information furnished in their packets regarding electromagnetic radiation. Craig Ciute supported a review of this matter. He suggested that Council Members visit his home and view the installation "in his neighbors backyard." Responding to M/Huffs request for a showing of hands, the audience indicated 12 to 7 that they supported a Council review of this matter. Terry Birrell pointed out that a number of audience members voting against the review were non-residents. She indicated the public can obtain information about telecommunications facilities through the City Managers office. She suggested that Council continue the matter until after standards have been established. Marie LaBond said that because one meeting was cancelled, there were only three Planning Commission Public Hearings, not four. She urged Council to reconsider this matter. 2.zgr- l!", MAY 6, 1997 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL public's concerns were being met by the Planning Commission actin. MPT/Herrera believed the Planning Commission worked with theapplicant and the neighboring residents to satisfactorily modify the project. A series of public hearings were held and, as a result of the approval, theapplicant must comply with 15 conditions. She said she had faith in the Comm ssion's ability to make decisions that are in the best interest of D.B. residents. Further, she expressed faith in staffs ability to recommend the pr ject for approval and felt there was no need to review this matter and tiat the Planning Commission's Decision should stand. C/Hamnony moved, C/Ansad seconded, to call for review of CUP 96{10 and DR 96-9 and set the matter for public hearing on June 3, 1997. In response to C/Werner as to whether the City needs to obt in the applicant's consent to review this matter, CA/Jenkins indicated that t at was not necessary. C/Wemer asked if the Council may request that specific informationf�om the applicant and neighboring residents. CA/Jenkins stated that this is a de novo hearing. The applicant E nd any public member may submit any, materials they wish. The Council cannot require submission. However, lack of submission may be considerec during review of the application. C/Werner asked what costs the City has incurred for this matter. CA/Jenldns indicated the only fee paid is the application fee. Since there is no appeal in this case, there is no appeal fee to be paid and tat any additional costs for review would be borne by the City. In response to C/Werner, CM/Belanger responded that appro imately $3,000 in costs had already been incurred for the review process. C/Werner asked for the motion to be amended to include his r revious request for three items: Petition updates, a three dimensional t mplate erection at the site and information regarding the amended CC&R' . C/Hamnony and C/Ansari agreed to amend the motion. Motion following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Harmony, Werner NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - MPT/Herrera, M/Huff ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None J by the JANUARY 28, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION cellular sites in the City of Diamond Bar. Two additional applications are pending approval with the City. He presented a graphic indicating the cellular site locations. Staff believes that a cellular site master plan exists based upon provider's needs. Some sites accommodate several cellular providers. CDD/DeStefano responded to VC/Ruzicka that the ity's ridgeline elevation is not appropriate to accommodate the reception and quality of desired service. At this time, it is not anticipated that single family residence, will be asked to accommodate these kinds of services. CDD/DeStefano presented background and historical information regarding communications systems monitored by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He spoke about neighboring cities ordinances which provide for wireless faci ities incorporated within free standing art such as a clock tower. CDD/DeStefano stated. Diamond Bar regulates wi eless telecommunications sites through the existing Planni g and Zoning Code which allows for use by right in some zones and for use via Conditional Use Permit in other zones. Eve zone requires a discretionary review by the Hearing Officer for Administrative Development Revie., or by the Pl nning Commission. He talked about the review and approval p ocess with respect to Diamond Bar cellular site installs ions. Staff determined through general information provided Dy the telecommunications carriers that property owners who p ovide cellular site accommodations can expect to receive fro$500 to $1200 per month. In addition, many cellular ca niers provide additional amenities to the property owner s ch as property improvements and signage. C/Schad asked if a topographical map indicating line of site installations would prevent interference by proposed construction_ He suggested light standards be used for cellular site installations in order to provide income for the City. He also suggested bouncing signals over and around structures. CDD/DeStefano responded that with respect to potential conflicts between property owners and cellular communications carriers; carriers need to locate sites they believe will not be blocked in the future. He stated the City probabl would not allow a cellular site facility to dictate potential land use decisions. Chair/Goldenberg recommended tonight's presentation b given to the City Council with emphasis on the permit a proval process and developer created master plan. MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Goldenberg called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/Schad. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Goldenberg, vice Chairman Ruzicka, and Commissioners, McManus and Schad Absent• Commissioner Fong - Also Present: Community Development Director James DeStefano, Senior Planner Catherine Johnson, and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CT_LENDAR: 1. Minutes of January 14, 1997. VC/Ruzicka made a motion, seconded by C/Schad, to approve the minutes of January 14, 1997 as.presented. Without objections, the motion was so ordered. OLD BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. Responding to the Planning Commission's request, CDD/DeStefano presented a report regarding wireless telecommunications facilities. With the cooperative effort of neighboring cities staffs and telecommunications carriers LA Cellular, Cox California and the Keith Companies, staff compiled the report. CDD/DeStefano explained the three currently utilized wireless telecommunications facilities known as the Cellular Systems, the Personal Communications Services (PCS) digital systems, and Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) analog digital systems. Transmission signals replicate and amplify voice messages carried from transmitting antennas to receiving antennas. He pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of the systems. Presently, five providers serve the Southern California area: AirTouch, LA Cellular, NexTel, PacBel Mobile Services, and Cox Communications. There are seventeen SANUARY 28, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9 (pursuant to Code Section 22.20.100) is a request for an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities for two service providers consisting of antennas to be located on a proposed 1,152 square foot barn with equipment cabinets located within and adjacent to the barn. This proposal includes an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing an easement from said Map restricting vehicle ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Project Address: 24401 Darrin Drive (northwest corner Darrin Drive and Armitos Place) Applicant: Cox California PCS, Inc., 182CO Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92612 Owner: Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 CDD/DeStefano presented the staff report. He indicated that in order to provide adequate advertising of this Public Hearing item, staff recommends that the Planning Com fission take no action on this item tonight and direct staff to readvertise Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9 when appropriate. VC/Ruzicka moved, C/Schad seconded, to continue Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 1. Development Code - Informational update. D/DeStefano presentelka Ce project. He refer ed De lopment Code survey s Gen ral Plan is the basi whit may account for the The rst Town Hall Meet Satur y, March 8, 1997. status update ont Deve opment the Commissioners to the Windmill alts summary enclosure The City's for the Development C e document w percentage of publi reponse. a g is tentatively sch u ed for VC/Ruzi Nka asked if colleg� students could as st in solicitiV community response. C/McManus kquested copies of thevurvey and survey resb3pses. C/Schad reit rated his concerns r arding implementa to of the Developme Code and more partic arty, the Tree Or ince MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/McManus. ROLL CALL: Present: vice Chairman Ruzicka, and Commissioners, Fong, McManus and Schad. Chairman Goldenberg arrived at 7:17 p.m. Also Present: Community Development Director James DeStefano, Senior Planner Catherine Johnson, and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of February 11, 1997.. C/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/McManus, to approve the minutes of January 28, 1997 as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. OLD BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS - None PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Developmer: Rcview 96-9, a request for the co -location of unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities by two service providers consisting of antennas to be located on a proposed barn, and equipment cabinets to be located within the barn and also next to the barn behind a fenced enclosure. This proposal also includes an amendment to Tract map 42584 removing an easement from said Map restricting vehicle ingress and egress to Armitos Place. project Address: 24401 Darrin Drive (northwest .corner Darrin Drive and Armitos Place) Applicants: Cox California PCS, Inc., 18200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite• 100, Irvine, CA 92612, and Pacific Bell Mobile Services, 5959 W. Century Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90015 FEBRUARY 25s 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION signatures of five neighbors residing adjacent to the pr ject. She indicated her neighbors are concerned that their views will be obstructed by the barn structure. In addition, the residents are concerned about the long term health impacts from constant low level radiation exposure and about the reduction of property values. She asked the Commission of to set a precedent by allowing residents to place anten31as in their back yards. She indicated that neighboring city officials told her antennas would not be allowed on residential properties in their communities. She asked the Commission to follow a policy of "prudent avoidance" s ch as the one practiced by San Diego which states that 1°wi Bless communications facilities, due to perceived concerns about health impacts, should not be located in areas where oeople would be exposed to them for prolonged periods of time'. She suggested the antennas be placed on City property in or er for the City to benefit from the lease payments. She asd the Commission to deny the project. Marie Nguyen, 367 Armitos Place, expressed concerns about her children's health. She is also concerned about property values. She pleaded with the Commission not to allow the antennas to be placed on residential property. She suggested the antennas be placed on City owned property instead. Joe Serrano, 365 Carpio Drive, stated he agrees with p evious speakers. James Golondzinier, 24339 Northview Place, stated he has no problem with the owner placing a barn on his property. He voiced his concerns that the 19 foot high antennas may need to be higher in the future as technology advances. He asked if the approval will state the maximum number of antennas and the maximum height, width and diameter that will be allow d. He said that his employer (Los Angeles County Fire Department) is concerned about health and safety issues related to EMF s. If any EMF's will be emitted from the proposed site, the project should not be placed in a residential area C/Schad asked Mr. Golondzinier if there is a possibility of frequency. impediment with respect to the adjacent fire station's communications equipment. Mr. Golondzinier stated he does not know the specifics and is not before the Planning Commission as a representative of the Los Angeles Fire Department. He suggested C/Schad contact his employer's communication department. Bruj Sharma, 24356 Darrin Dri--s, spoke against the project. He stated he believes the party who selected the project site has no regard for the residents. Studies regarding EMF radiation safety concerns are inconclusive. He asked if the applicant can guarantee that residents will not be adversely FEBRUARY 25, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Property owners: Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 CDD/DeStefano presented the staff report. Pursuant to applicant's request to continue the item to March 11, 1997, staff recommends that Conditional Use permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9 be continued to March 25, 1997. Chair/Goldenberg arrived and assumed the Chair. James Bartley, 411 Carpio Drive, stated that he feels the previously proposed barn structure is unsightly. He does not understand why antennas have to be placed in a residential area. Horacio Briz, 420 Carpio Drive, asked the height of the antenna, whether the City has conducted studies related to the impact on the neighborhood, and if night lighting is proposed. He stated that the project will impact the neighborhood and the residents do not want the type of building that has been proposed to be located in the neighborhood. The residents will fight against the project. Mel Davis, 419 Carpio Drive, stated he is against the project which conflicts with the General Plan zoning. He indicated that he purchased his property 20 years ago primarily for the view of the hills and mountains, not a view of any antennas which may or may not have blinking red lights due to excessive height. He asked if the City has imposed a height and size limit for antennas, and if not, why not? He said he does not understand why the City would want to place antennas above ground less than one mile from a City beautification project that involves undergrounding utilities. He further stated he is concerned about the City proposing to remove and ingress/egress map restriction to Armitos Place. He suggested the City consider a Golden Springs Road ingress/egress or a westerly access road which would parallel the SR60 freeway to the Diamond Ranch High School. If the applica:its feel this facility is necessary they should consider placing it on the Diamond Ranch High School property in order to financially benefit the community. He said he understands the property contains a deed restriction which requires the property owner to secure written approval from a percentage of neighborhood property owners prior to development of the property. He asked if such an approval had been submitted to the City. He urged the Commission to deny the project. Pat H., 540 Macenta Lane, asked if the proposed project will create additional interference with her television transmission. Mary and Doug Yuen, 379 Armitos Place, stated they are opposed to the project. She presented a petition containing FEBRUARY 25, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION impacted. He concurs with other neighborhood residents who feel property will be devalued in the area and th t the antennas could be raised to a significantly greater hei ht in the future. He said he believes it is inhumane f or the property owner to consider placing antennas in a resid ntial neighborhood for personal financial gain. Edward Le Van, 24365 Darrin Drive, stated he would like to have cellular service in the area. He believes people are objecting to the project out of fear. He said he feeLs the project should go forward. Helen Britt, 24313 Vista Buena Drive, stated that as a nurse practitioner, she believes it is unconscionable that the City is considering this project. Research indicates that this type of radiation effects children and causes cancer, The incidents of cancer in children is much greater than that of adults. This item should not be continued- because it is totally wrong. Chair/Goldenberg explained that a project is approve with certain conditions. An applicant must apply to the City if he/she wishes to make changes to the project after the fact. C/Schad stated some of the citizen's concerns are valid. The type of antennas proposed are very high frequency line- f -site installations that do not pose a significant emission risk. He. suggested that in addition to southerly and westerly exposure, this location could accommodate northerly transmission. He said that in his opinion, this form of communication would not be detrimental to individual health and safety. He asked to know the frequency and power transmission. He suggested the existing light tow rs be considered as facilities for housing communication antennas. If the antenna structures were placed closer together, the power conditions could be reduced by about 75 percent C/Fong encouraged the applicant to locate an alternate roject site. VC/Ruzicka moved, C/Schad seconded, to continue Public Ilearing Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 6-9 to March 25, 1997. Without objections, the motion was so ordered. 2. Develo went Review No. 7-1, a request (Pu scant o Code Sectio 22.72.010 and 2 72.020(4) to conve an existing Unocal ervice station 'to an unattended retal gas tation with the existing service ays remaining op tions The fueling f ction of the fac lity will be operat completely without a tendant partici ation similar to commercial "cardlock" pe facilities. he site will be mon for d by a "host site" ich is available o assist customers a d'bly via MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 25, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/Goldenberg. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad, and Commissioners, Fong, Goldenberg, and McManus. Also Present: Community Development Director James DeStefano, Senior Planner Catherine Johnson, and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/ PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of March 11, 1997. VC/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/Fong, to approve the minutes of February 25, 1997 as presented. Without objection, the motion was approved 5-0. OLD BUSINESS - None CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 3. Conditional Use Permit 98-10 and Development Review 96-9 (pursuant to Code Section 22.20.100) is a request for unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmise-icn facility for two providers consisting of antennas to be located on a proposed 1,152 square foot barn with equipment cabinets located within and adjacent to, the barn. This proposal includes an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing an easement from said Map restricting vehicle ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Continued from February 25, 1997. Project Address: 24401 Darrin Drive (northwest corner Darrin Drive and Armitos Place) Applicants• Cox California PCS, Inc., 18200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92612, and' Pacific Bell Mobile Services, 5959 W. Century Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90015 MARCH 25, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION limit, they would have to reapply for the change and proceed through the public hearing process for approval. C/Goldenberg stated the fire station has been located next to the proposed project location for approximately 10 years and carries a wider range band limit than is proposed for the cellular site. With respect t o the resident's safety concerns, several cell sites are located at the Diamond Bar High School. He agreed that the City should be concerned about real and not perceived safety issues with respect to EMF's. He stress4d the need for the Planning Commission to make an in ormed decision based upon the facts of the situation. C/McManus moved, C/Goldenberg seconded, to continue Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96--9 to April 22, 1997 and direct staff to re otice the public hearing. The motion was approved 5-0. BUSINESS: 1. Transmittal of the Draft Redevelopment Plan, Pre inary Report, and Dft Environmental Tact Report r the Diamond Bar Ec omic Revitalization Area. CDD/DeStefano recommends that the report. CDD/DeStefano re welcome a list of 1997 Planning Co environmental and prepare responses. ented the stafA Planning Commissi onded to VC/Schad questions in advanc fission meeting in development consult CDD/DeStefano explc*nec redevelopment planc' er .consists of projectsha \necsity me of the rede'k e, he cited the litation Project the lifetime of ing such projects of future plan rrently being re•cation. L�aZ6731WOT-03YtI0 T*l119)�W 400A YFAR report. Aga, f f receive ana kile gat staff of the Al order fc nts and sl it a" the Lff to ! to C/Goldenbkrg thatthe s a term of 45 y- rs. Th list t could be completed within the lopment project area. ks an current Diamond Bear Bou evard rich will again be rseconst ucted ie redevelopment pVaject area. t this time will ;negate the modifications. The p;7ojec list riled by staff fog', po sable C/Fong commented fiat the information shared .at the Ply !rIs Institute Seminar was valuable. He state the Commissioner' were able to spend quality time together whit allowed them to ecome better acquainted. MARCH 25, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Property Owners: Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 CDD/DeStefano presented the staff report. He indicated the applicant has requested this item be continued to April 22, 1997. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9 to April 22, 1997, and renotice the public hearing. Marie Nguyen, 367 Armitos Place, stated she has acquired 125 signatures from area residents who oppose this project as presented. She indicated the signatory stated that in several instances, they did not receive the public hearing notice. She asked that the April 22, 1997 public hearing be renoticed. CDD/DeStefano responded to Chair/Ruzicka that public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the applicant's property at 24401 Darrin Drive. In addition, because the property owner is requesting a modification to the original tract map, notices went to all residents within the boundary of the subdivision. Approximately 300 residents were sent notices. C/Goldenberg asked Mrs. Nguyen what, in her opinion, is the major objection of the neighboring residents to this project. Mrs. Nguyen responded to C/Goldenberg that the project property is zoned residential and there is concerned that it is being rezoned. The residents are concerned about the increased traffic, potential safety concerns for children, and a reduction of property values. Armando Gonzales, 24380 Vista Buena Drive, said he received notice of the February 25, 1997 public hearing. However, he did not receive a notice with respect to tonight's meeting. He concurred that it would be more appropriate to discuss this item when the revised plans are available €or review. He indicated he is concerned about the proposed project's visual impact on the surrounding properties, how the property values will be effected, and whether the health of people living in the area will be adversely effected. He said he is not opposed to the project. He believes the towers should be located in another area. CDD/DL,tefano responded to C/Goldenberg that if the Planning Commission approved a six foot high antenna structure and the applicant wished to exceed the six foot MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 22, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 Eas Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/McManus. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman S Commissioners, Fong, Goldenberg and at the Copley , and inus . Also Present: Community Development Director James Destefano, Senior Planner Catherine ohnson, and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: Craig Clute stated his concerns regarding the Heritage Tract Neighborhood Traffic Study's definition of "through traffic" and elimination of the red curbing on the west side of Fountain springs Road between Diamond Bar Boulevard and the Country Hills Towne Center driveway. C/McManus asked Mr. Clute for the two definitions of traffic. Mr. Clute responded to C/McManus that the traffic study i that all country Hills Towne Center traffic is "expected" in the neighborhood. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of April 8, 1997. VC/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/McManus, to minutes of April 8, 1997 as presented. The approved 5-0. OLD BIISINESS - None NEW BUSINESS - None CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Zdicates traffic the was 1. Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Re iew 96-9 (pursuant to Code Section 22.20.100) is a request for the co -location of a telecommunications facility by two service providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, re owing a APRIL 22o 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Continued from March 25, 1997. Project Address: 24401 Darrin Drive (northwest corner Darrin Drive and Armitos Place) Applicants; Cox California PCS, Inc. 18200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92612 and Pacific Bell Mobile Services, 5959 W. Century Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90045 -Property Owners: Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SP/Johnson presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 95-9, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution. SP/Johnson responded to Chair/Ruzicka that requests for antenna(s) in excess of the three proposed antenna would be subject to the public hearing process. A condition of approval proposes the top of the antennas will be six feet below the top of the hill. Jeff McKay, Pacific Bell Mobile Services, explained why the carriers chose the proposed site to co -locate their antennas. He presented slides showing antenna placement below grade and indicating the lack of visual impact to neighboring residences. He asked that the Planning Commission approve the project and delete the condition requiring construction of a berm. He indicated the carriers held a public meeting to address citizen's concerns. Mr. McKay responded to C/McManus that the closest resident to the proposed facility is the applicant who is approximately 150 feet from the facility. Responding to C/McManus, Jim Marquez, Cox Communications, stated the antennas are not visible to residences. Therefore, the additional landscaping will mitigate any opportunity for visual impact. A berm will have no additional mitigating effect. C/Fong asked if the antenna will create visual impact for the residences east of the proposed site. Mr. Marquez responded to C/Fong that the nearest residence is 150 feet from the proposed installati6n. APRIL 22o 1447 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Landscaping will camouflage the site thereby eliminating any visual impact. Mr. McKay responded to C/Fong that the proposed antennas are 6 inches wide. Responding to VC/Schad, Mr. McKay reiterated that the demonstration pole indicates the maximum antenna height. He stated his understanding of the restriction removal precludes the applicant from conducting activities in addition to those allowed under the CUP and existing zoning. The owner is providing split rail fencing around the entire property. The applicant will provide slecurity fencing around the facility. VC/Schad indicated he would like for the applicant to ground the security fence. Mr. McKay explained to VC/Schad that some of th native walnut trees may have to be thinned to provideline-of- site transmission. A condition of approval indicates the applicants will provide ongoing maintenance for t1Le site. The applicants intend to provide drought tolerant landscaping such as holly oak. A 200 AMP panel with a one 20 AMP breaker will be provided at the site. Water will be provided to the site for vegetation mai tenance only. Anthony Greer, Cox Communications, responded toVC/Schad that each carrier uses approximately 300 watts of power. Chair/Ruzicka reopened the public hearing. Craig Clute asked the applicant to explain how the landscaping will be irrigated until it takes hold, and to what extent the trees will be thinned, cut or removed. He warned the residents to be concerned about visual impact. He asked if the site property could ba sold, divided or improved at any time. He stated his concerns regarding EMF health risks. He asked what kind o backup system will be provided for the facility. Chair/Ruzicka stated that because he is also co cerned about safety risks with respect to EMF's, he co tacted The Environmental Protection Agency, The N tional Institute of Health, The National Institute of Environmental Health Services, Federal Communi ations Commission, and The Motorola Consortium. He further stated that all EMF studies indicate there is no information available that EMFFIs are dangerous toy Robert Zirbes stated he reviewed the project pl s. He indicated that although he agrees with the majo ity of APRIL 22t 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION staff's conditions, he feels a four foot high berm may distract from the aesthetic qualities. Responding to C/McManus, Mr. Zirbes indicated he believes the additional landscaping would be warranted without the berm. Mel Davis stated that he spoke against the project at the February Planning Commission meeting. With the current revisions, he is stili opposed to the project. He indicated he is concerned about a potential proliferation of antennas at the site. He asked who will provide the ongoing landscape maintenance for the site and if the neighborhood residents will be expected to pay for the maintenance. He urged the Planning Commission to reject the proposed facility. Armando Gonzales stated he feels the revised proposal addresses the visual impact concerns of the neighboring residents. He said he has some concerns about the future use of the site and the controlled growth of communication devices. He indicated he hopes the City will be more active with respect to the overall subject of communication device installations. Frank Schabarum, JM Consulting Group, asked that the Planning Commission approve the project as presented. He indicated that the planting and ongoing maintenance of the project site landscaping is provided by the property owner, Pacific Bell Mobile Services and Cox Communications. Dr. Jerrold Bushberg representing Pacific Bell Mobile Services, concurred with Chair/Ruzicka's statement regarding EMF's. The current FCC standard which will become effective September 1, 1997, applies to all existing as well as, new facilities, and provides a 50 fold safety margin. The proposed facility utilizes approximately one microwatt which is about 1000 times less than the standard. Dr. Bushberg responded to VC/Schad that the effective radiated power of the systems proposed for PBMS is about 300 watts. Collectively, the radiated system power is about 900 watts. The system must provide a minimum signal to insure minimum quality strength of the signature at the fringe of the curvature. Currently, there are no antennas that allow multiplexing. Dan Noland told the Planning Commission about a public safety incident that occurred in the area of the proposed site. He favors the proposed communication facility. APRIL 22, 1997 PAGE 6 PLANNING CODMISSION a berm and that the antennas do not have to be lowered any further than six feet below the top of the hill. Mr. Marquez responded to C/Fong that Pacific Bell. Mobile Services and Cox Communication would not be opposed to co -locating other company's antennas at the site. Future applicants would need to prove that they would not interfere with the current installation and present their project to the City for public hearing. Responding to VC/Schad, Mr. Marquez indicated 4 volt closed cell batteries will provide the backup system. C/Goldenberg asked what provisions are made to the City upon expiration of the applicant's two year landscape maintenance bond. He indicated to Mrs. Ewen that many commercial ventures are located in the City's residences. He requested an explanation of the citizen's petition against the project. CDD/DeStefano responded to C/McManus that if the Planning Commission approves this project and a future applicant wishes to place antennas at the site, the res lution provides an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the Planning Commission public iearing process. CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Fong that the CUP res lution does not require the applicants to cooperate witi other cellular service providers. - Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. C/Goldenberg moved, C/McManus seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and development Review No. 96-9, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution subject to the following corrections and amendments: Page 4, Finding J, s ntence one to read as follows: "The proposed removal of he map restriction is not of significant benefit to the City." Modify Condition K on Pages 6 and 7 to eliminate the berm, retain the landscaping conditions language. Add the following to Condition B, Page 5: "the permanent maintenance of the landscaping by the applicant., C/Fong proposed the motion be amended to pr ide a binding agreement in the resolution that the app icants cooperate with future cellular providers to co locate their facilities at the site. Mr. Marquez stated the tri -lateral lease provid s non- exclusivity.- Other similar types of business re not restricted from enjoying the property aspecto. He APRIL 22, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COXHISSION Mary Ewen stated she is concerned that the project installation will cause a negative precedent. She asked that the Planning Commission consider a moratorium against antenna installations while the City considers the matter. She does not believe the installation will benefit the City. She asked the transmission direction of the antennas. Tom Jackson stated he believes the project presents no adverse visual impact to the surrounding residences and that the best possible technology should be made available to the citizens. Bill Rafferty approves of the project and feels that Diamond Bar should have improved technology available to accommodate public needs. Robin Stone stated she and her husband believe the proposed project will benefit the Diamond Bar area and present no safety risks to her children or to the families that live in her community. The low impact project design as revised will present no adverse, aesthetic impact to the surrounding residents and visitors to the area. The location of the site will provide critical cellular phone needs. Helen Arlene Britt said she feels the City and the applicants have worked to accommodate -the resident's needs. She believes the revised plans are an improvement over the previous plans which incorporated a barn structure. She stated that EMF studies have not been completed and she is concerned that a proliferation of antennas may present a public safety concern. She asked that the City provide for the installation of allergy free plants. Mrs. Britt responded to C/Goldenberg that she has reservations and concerns. However, she can accept the revised project because the applicant has made an effort to do the right thing. Mr. Greer indicated the antennae are pointed up and down the 60 Freeway and away from homes. Mr. Marquez stated cellular installations are no more considered a commercial than cable television or telephone installations. The proposed installation will benefit subscribers and emergency services. He asked that the Planning Commission approve the project with conditions listed by staff with the exception that the only condition relating to visual impact will be the added vegetation with no importing of additional soil for APRIL 22, 1997 PAGE 7 PLANNING offered to provide evidence to the City's lanning Division and suggested that the condition be subject to the review of the Director of the City's Planning Division, that the applicant can provide evidence that they are receptive to co -location. C/Goldenberg stated he wishes to let the motion tand as stated since the applicants have provided for co -location within their lease. He favors incorporating a city-wide cellular site plan rather than encouraging additional installations at this time. C/Goldenberg responded to C/Fong that it is in the best interests of the applicants to encourage other vendors to co -locate their facilities. With respect to additional sites, the City should consider a cell site plam within the City. Mr. Marquez asked if Condition K, Pages 6 ano 7, is sufficiently amended to provide for the elimintion of Condition L on Page 7. Mr. Marquez responded to VC/Schad thatthe app icant's engineers have indicated that the top of the ntennas should be placed no lower than flat pad level nd that lower installations would not be effective. CDD/DeStefano restated the motion. Mr. Marquez reiterated to Chair/Ruzicka ttat the equipment will not operate at a point six feet below the flat pad without significant reduction of transmission levels. Responding to VC/Schad, Mr. Marquez indica ed the applicant will accept lowering the top of the ant nnas to flat pad level. C/McManus stated his understanding that the app icant's proposed antenna would not be below six feet below grade and that the poles depicted in the photograp s were placed at grade level. The poles placed at the height of grade level were not visible at grade level ind the landscaping is proposed to mitigate any potentia visual impact. C/McManus proposed that the motion under consider tion be amended to include the elimination of Condition L, Page 7. C/Goldenberg agreed to amend his motion to include the elimination of Condition L, Page 7. APRIL 22, 1997 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/DeStefano restated the motion as follows: To approve Conditional Use Permit No. 96-14 and Development Review No. 96-9, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution subject to the following amendments: Amend Page 4, Finding J, regarding the map restriction; amendment to Condition 5. (b) on Page 5 adding the "permanent maintenance of the property and landscaping"; amendment to Condition K, Page 6 and 7, eliminating the two sentences that discuss berming; elimination of Condition L, Page 7; and re -alphabetize the conditions accordingly. C/Goldenberg responded to C/Fong that in his opinion, appropriate landscaping will provide a much improved aesthetic view over the proposed four foot high berm. CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Fong that the applicant has indicated that earth removed from the equipment pad would be utilized to create a small berm on the flat pad at the top of the hill. C/Goldenberg agreed to amend his motion to amend Condition K to provide that the earth removed from the equipment pad will be used to create a small berm on the flat pad at the top of the hill. C/Fong stated that the condition pertaining to tree thinning should specifically stipulate that the shape of the trees will not be significantly altered. Referring to plan drawing A-1, he asked why certain trees are slated for removal. Mr. Marquez stated the tree thinning is at the discretion of the City's Director of Planning. No trees are slated to be removed. The motion was approved with the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As presented in the meeting agenda. Goldenberg, McManus, Fong, Chair/Ruzicka VC/Schad None From: C1ar W. Narmortq To: Dale: 44M97 Tata: 16:05:48 I Page 2 of 2 r. From Ike C 02 e Clair W. hopmony Cittj Councilman, C.iamond Ear, CA 4:'29.`97 Cin• of Diamond Bar Attn: Terry Belanger, City Manager C- 21660 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 RE: Conditional User Permit 96-10 and Development Review 9609 Dear Mr. Belanger: Under City Council procedure. per City Attomey X•fichael Jenkins opinion, I formerly request that the above referenced Planning Commission action be placed on next Tuesday's May 6, 1997. City Council Agenda for Council determination as to whethe it is willing to reconsider the Commission action. (Jenkins can give you the proper terminology.) Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 95-9 (pursuant to Code Section 22.20.100) is a request for the co -]oration of a telecommunications facility by two sen ice providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Ar=tos Place. A substantial contingency of Home ()%Ijer Association members for the affect] development have convinced me that the issue of placement of antenna facilities residential neighborhoods needs to be examined, in all deference to the Plamm Commission's fine efforts, from a policy perspective by the City Council for bo public health & welfare reasons, commercial/residential mixed uses, and open spa issues. Councilwoman Ansari has joined me in requesting this item be placed on Tuesday's Agenda. I have discussed our request with Mayor Huff who you work in planning agendas. Signed, w Clair W. Harmony P.01- 4153. D.—J &., (A 9x65 UW (909) 86CL 4 , FAX (909) 861-8881 111.1 D.;1 F« a V.4k. &,....1 From: Clair W ifan ony To: Die: 4129197 Time: 16:05:22 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE Page 7 of 2 To: Time: 16:05:14 From: Clair W. Harmony Date: 04f29197 Subject : Microsoft Word - Document2 Pages (including cover): 2 Please review and take appropriate actions. Clair --3 -7= r - ' . c^, r 5 rz L':�.iS: April 15, 1997 ' '97 APR 15 1,19 '56 To the City of Diamond Bar: Attached are copies of the signed petitions that we have gathered from some of our neighbors that are opposed to the proposed project, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. Also attached is a copy of the minutes of a recent Planning Commission meeting (meeting of March 24, 1997) from the city of Thousand Oaks regarding the unmanned wireless telecommunications facility. We, the Citizen Committee, would like to have them forwarded to the Planning, Commission and the City Council for their review. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Mr. Jim Bartley Mrs. Jo Bartley Ms. Helen Arlene Britt Mr. H M Briz Mr. Mel Davis Mr. Armando Gonzalez Mrs. Marie Levan -Nguyen Mr. Brij Sharma Mr. Doug Yuen Mrs. Mary Yuen 1 a� c o — v M rp 6 U O 9) �� cn _ UCVCc 65 Ac A G c cfi y C a O II (f2 �a G E°C'°�°Jai���u� X03 m.: zy oar C L,_ C O c3Checc.raUimo GyA j •� .- .c 1 a� c o — v M ti y 6 U O 9) mP 'a 3 _ UCVCc 65 Ac A G c cfi y C a O II CSL' y RO R: G v N L �a G E°C'°�°Jai���u� X03 m.: zy oar C L,_ C O c3Checc.raUimo GyA j •� .- .c GRi C > 3u co r.' aai� •� -''•,' • w vs Cry � � � -4 L-' �C H G Cn' w F. •?. y � AC � � •� �-. .cY .'�., Y . p ' .� w sG. 'i7 y .x o ti y 'C, f••r C :O .� ti _y C 'U -'C C o _w" y w-=� c U CJ y - a R .= 0 GA 0 y .••' Gn � � C •, .c m o o cc[ 3E" � U a o o � �� -� �+ 3 ecu° `C �a T x y ti fC7r•% M- C �` C t1..0,t a+ N "Cj '•' ° y � 4 -� O a ep QJ i• y _ r, � C•y 'a C. a p ++'G `� �� � M to G • .� 'G ." G i :t4 O m eo C (, � `' U= -c � ti s- ai 3 c o•_.�y m`" 3� � °' � o:- ` c c L� 0 3 � c � � c 3 ?•� u.c � c,-�r,� y a "� c•r ¢, oQ c o` � � _� '� C x +L •� � � .�, d ti � H R1 C�`'.•O 3 y C+ •Ua"" � .0 L C '_ � :" C, mai � y•c c� Gy G � air C' -o In G' .C, gfz C --C �� "A C,C v y C^ u ; to 4 C n• � �. C G +r. ccy , V �_ rG ' � o.c� 3 3w"RyEu V sem. ' C+ � -• .- >. o a �. ^ � cce Lt >�G�U 3z ,cy3'c 3 •m co�-�_ U s:� �► O � � m y � 3 C p � = C • V � O 'a O 1� � UO � ,� �_ O A 'C ti� G> G 7 � � -. � q '" G •� _ = � _• E ti ;o z -• � _c c oz.E '� m `o c �, c• = c m � •tic � E '3 c .E 3 'C E y o V y � _� .., u .� E �� 'a c: c •v: G fie' � •'�i 'b O h m � U II7 � v.• C � :r, > �. � G:, i G t=. C rC � ' G ...• O -' :' � v O RL„•1 0 e� e� 04-09-1997 09:06AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET NQ- OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS MMEETING OF MARCS 24,1997 The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Chair Po in the Council Chambers, 2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Thousand Oaks, California Commissioners Anderson, Carpenter, Frields, and Polansld present. Also present were Staff Members: Assistant City Attorney Schreiner Deputy Director Sangster Principal Engineer Reithrnayr Associate Planner Burgess Associate PLmmer Young Consultant Jonathan Kramer, M.K. Wyatt & Assoc. VCFD Larry Williams CRPD Representative Gilmore TOED Sergeant Matson Sr.`Administrative Secretary Sepe WRITTEN COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/CONTINUANM: 1. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Susan & Robin Perrenoud (con) re: Case A - DP 96-7271 Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 2. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Pichard & Margot Ball (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-7271 Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726Mad fic Bell Mobile Services 3 . Letter dated 3/20/97 from Jon E_ Morris, Real Estate Mgr, for AT&T re: Case A - DP 727/AT&T Wireless Services 4. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Jacqueline Ruchman (con) re. Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services S. Letter dated 3/17/97 from James G., Roxanne C_ & Vivian A. Horning (con) re: Case A - 96-7271AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 6. Letter received 3124197 from Vito Covino (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727IAT&T PCD.440.42IuzUMia3-2497 ADR 09 '97 1C:14 P.02 04-09-19W 09=06AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E Jr ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.03 Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 7. Letter dated 3119197 from David W. WOlkwitz (Pro) re: Case A - DP. 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services g, postcard reed from Wade Zirnmermarl (con) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 9_ Note dated 3/18/97 from Sill Barker (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services lo. Letter dated 3124/97 from Drew Oliver (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Beit Mobile Services PUBLIC ISCII ION:- D Pres. of Greater Shadow Oaks HOA, 338 E. Sidlee St., T.O.; unhappy with references made at the 3/10/97 meeting that HOA was not an active and viable organization; requested apology from Commission and was extended by Chair Powers. Cathy Koch. 571 Westminster St., T.O-, warted to make comments regarding paint colon at The Promenade (PCR 182); Chair Powers requested that she delay her comments until the Commission had an opportunity to review the report which was inadvertently absent from the packet; copy of report given to Ms. Koch. Nick uidwa"s, N.P., encouraged support for the Animal Crackers inning for Grand Marshal; paint colors at The Promenade appears to be well received by the community, felt Council should have approved the Comwt ssion's attendance of APA conference in San Diego on April 3-9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ]DP 96-727 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES/13P 96-726 - PA99C BELL MOBILE SERVICES y Speaker cards: P. I.atle T3ns1 repres. AT&T, 2927 de la viva, Santa Barbara, pro; Jeff McHaddad, repres. Pacific Ben, 5959 W. Century Blvd., L.A., pro; Stev n Isbell radio freq. cons.; 5959 Century Blvd., 9200, L.A, pro; David c res. B re AT&T, 1149 Bath, SB., pro; Fred D. Burkhardt repres. -----� P T. Chamber of Commerce, 625 W. crest Dr., T.O., pro; � Aidukas 1395 Dalaidge Ct., T.O.,T.O., con; Dave coqrrie Ca3421 Indian Mesa Dr., T.O., pro.; Robert Phipps, 1489 Wilder St., Carenter. 1743 La Granada Dr., T.O., con; Roger Barker TI• 1394 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; Qrs Aidu 1395 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; Paul Ukovic, 1629 Shadow Oaks, T.O., con; D2bby CarlCM, 1859 Sapra St., T.O., con; Ken BlQck. 1625 Shadow Oaks P1., T.O., con; Mali ppe g rr� 1748 Country Oaks, T.O., con; Dana er, 1784 Country Oaks Ln., T -O., con; Mark SandgEom 3421 Indian Mesa, T.O., pro; Bruce McCunneY, 1912 EF k-4onte Dr., T.O., con. FCD:440 t2j=& ja.M"7 2 04-09-1997 09=07AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA 7O 131081445.4 P.04 Statement cards: J. Michael & Pamela B. Sipple, 1875 Sapra St., T.O., con; Tim &1UdburgBurke, 1790 Country Oaks Lane, T.Q., con; Karen Phipps, 1489 Wilder SL, T.O., con; Ron & Lyn K Dller, 1868 Sapra St., T.O., con; Frances Clohessy, 1492 Valley High Ave., T.O., con; Richard & Judy Masterq,1867 Sapra St., T.O., con; Tarn Masters, 1678 Shadow Oak, T.O., con; Chong W. Lee, 1697 Shadow Oaks PI., T.O., con; Josh Leach, 47 Ocean View, 410, S.B., pro; Maureen Faulkner, 629 Shadow Oaks Pi., T.O., con; Susan Perrenoud, 1657 Shadow Oaks PI., T.O., con; Bradley ess, 1810 Chapala St., 48, S.B., pro; Kurt Sauter, 1516 El Dorado Dr., T.O., con; Ingrid Orr, 1860 Sapra St., T.O.. con; Bob Perrenoud, 1657 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; J. T. Huang, 1378 Oalaidg Ct., T.O., con; Ron Muddler, 1605 Shadow Oaks PI., T.O., con; Joseph Raboy, 1648 Shadow Oakk Pl., T.O., con; Paul Laroche, 1892 Shaw Ct., T.O., con. NCULve De laratia • subject to the following findings: Aesthetics - inadequacy of mitigation roadways and park site; cumulative impacts. DP 96-726 - Pacific Bell Res. 11-97 of Shadow Oaks Pl ce and 300 feet east of Church RQad-subiect to the follgwing findings. 1. The granting of this request would be detrimental to the public welfare and enjoyme it of private property by the residents immediately'adjacent to the proposed site. 2. The granting of the permit is not consistent or in compliance with all provisions of the Sepic 11iighways Element and the intent and purpose of the Protected Ridgeline Policies. 3. Approval of this request would set a precedent for attracting additional wimlen telecommunication facilities in this location. 4. There are alternative sites available that could provide necessary coverage with less environmental impact. 5. There will be a negative visual impact from this development as viewed from the adjacen Old Meadows Park and the proposed picnic pavilion on the plateau below the site. 6. There will be a negative impact on the proposed lookout site for recreational users. 7. There will be a negative impact on the property values of adjacent residences dueic� the perceived potential health effects of this facility. S. There will be a negative impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood due to intrusion on the protected ridgeline within their immediate view corridors. rC1r_440-4ZtMVMe1L7-24-97 3 CSC �c rn� 04-09-1997 09:08AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.05 DP 96-727 - AT&T wirelcs Sznric Res• 12-97 726. Should an appeal be filed, the Con=&sion recommends that the following revisions to conditions be incorporated: Condition No. 19 (AT&T) and No. 54 (Pacific Bell) revised: Condition No. 35 (AT&T) and No. 70 (Pacific Bell) revised: Condition No. 14 (AT&T) and No. 49 (Pacific Bell) revised: -s .?�a.: s C r ati=q—a`yy 1 r r - .w • • . r • �. .■ • .. •i — . k. r -.V • w ■ ...• .a1 Condition No. 36 and No. 65 revised: Any expansion or modification of the facility shall require the filing of a ' modification application to be reviewed by the Plannins Commission. Add new condition under DES -Ni- section for both AT&T and Pacific Bell: pCD:aaUj/n d rL12x a7 4 04-09-1997 09:09AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF S J ACOSTA 70 13106144%3 A.06 LD 669MPD 96-506 - FRANK MCDONALD 'TRUST TRI The mmi ian nanim ..:.,«, (AM a[7eS of a to contig to ril 7 Int fou 4 arc is f r o 1997• a r uest t to low the all w t di i cti n o f i feet soot of L Road. SUP 95-902 Kaior Modiircatioe No. 4 - LAKESxORE LEARNING STORE Speaker cards: Joseph Blanco, repres. App., 2695 E. Dominquez St., Carson, pro; Jack Roy, App., 2695 E. Dominguez St., Carson, pro. The Comm ion nani ov l a reed o continue to April 7,1997: re est to all w an i __ _ r_ _ _- _..*r. -....e..., ._ — 07 East Th usan O s B ul rd . MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. CORRESPD ENGE AND REFERRALS: (CDrfinued to Meeting of 417!97) ^ A. Arroyo Conejo Bikeway/Greenbelt Project (HA) B. On -building Sign Design Guidelines for Commercial Development (PJM} C. PCR 140 - Moorpark Village (Caruso Holdings) Building Sign Design (BR) D. PCR 192 - Paint Colors at The Promenade (BR) PLANNTNG DIRECTOR REPORTS AND REFERRALS: None. 1NnNTTES: Minutes of March 10, 1997, approved (5-0) as amended. CONv11viIS ION DISCUSSION: None. PCD AA"'71....W;n i?a97 5 04--09-1997 09:09AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E 3 ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.07 at I1:25 to 7:00 p.m. on Monday, April 7, 1997, for a special meeting - AD DUg E IT: p.m. —. - --� mowers, Chair pCOMTnission Date Approved PCD.440-42 mvW;. L?d�T1 TOTAL P_O7 ON AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PER -10 -'AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9679 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele, telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i; located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan�yf to another use. �.Ct � r 1 Resident I Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 191 15 ^ ' TITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE YAK 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW .96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. W(�-JAS -�1A- Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) dv O— Signature 3Gl fL/f-c& Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 •97 �?R 15 "- • "11;2 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-14 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele. telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that, the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chant to another use. I -;�r. 'M - i2 l Resid nt / roperty Owner Name (Printed) Signatur Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PEP 96-1-07A7-EVELOPMLNT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42554 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PE ON AGAINST ' CONDITION 96 -10 -AND EVEEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivirele s telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby b,y signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city f Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96110 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Tt -L--f -RN J A- 6-06 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 1 S ignatureX i Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 d :a The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property rp rtis located in a residential zone which we feel should not bey to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG U CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivirele,, telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i; located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chane( to another use. Resident &Property Signa Name (Printed) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 In PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another .use. Res' ent / Property Owner Name (Printed) 7. Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) 1 Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo Dt radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident �e�ty Owner Name (Printed) Signature f Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) : Signature l b-2, • � 1 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond E ar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change( to another use. MT)P:i E-: --V. L15 � Ati - Q C U'JcJ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) tom- Signat e G-7 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION A GAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9610 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �\) ;, N C 0 -��t+J Resident I Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) -� 1 Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 a o �, PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fool radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners withi a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B, zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 6. PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use_ Resident Property Owner Name (Printed) S�re 373 7,z; 7'� s �- Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners witf a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond L zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change( to another use. Resident /Property Owner Name (Printed) X Signature 1 Ste" Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed)` r - JSiatur Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL. USE PER '97 9` i--�� A3 b DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc of radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city f Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanac to another use. Tan4,i v la 1gf4�1 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature V 2�3z5 Vs e, `F-Sz{eaier- -Dr- Residence Address ( Number, Street) ��1. Imo.✓ J% �L,' Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 L6. J ON AGAINST CO 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property' Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) L6. Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITIC 96-1 N AGAINST COND ) AND DEVELOPM E PERIVIT W 96-9 —- i c The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wire telecommunications transmission facilities I antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 9E and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition .is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanE to another use. Resident I Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ." '03 ss i0 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW %,-9 c) s 7 :0.3 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission, facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 0."!sir 1 - Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i mature Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST 96-10 AND DEVI ONAL USE PERMIT T REVIEW 6 "O ] °3 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wire telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i; located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanat to another use. J J ! [ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) A wX Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIO rYrT Tf 1f Ti7T� _ • • � - 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT "VIE 6-9,R 15 7.11:03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in ober residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sic,ninc, this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident] -Y operty Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 C: L PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PE IT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIbW .9.619 703 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc of radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan to another use. Resident ! Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW X96=9 :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAII 96-10 AND D SE.PERNU T::, `.. M 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele., telecommunications transmission, facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident f property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature / f/ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 JLC f PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9699 APR The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition.is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S* nature % , Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST ONAL USE PERNIIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENTREVIEW. 9R ., t The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fox radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chant to another use. C' G10 i ( L--� .r 1 C Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sig ature -xPIA4 G J Residence Address ( Number, trees) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ON AG )6-10 AND NST C EVEL 0 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and Tracowners es within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries 25 84 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission o t e cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and y of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST C NAL USt PE '- Tyr 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 91 TFR!T5il,-03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wire telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition. is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan-ae to another use. �R18�-I 1'�gr1CiC� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signatur Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW9964 5 r11:03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. r 1 t. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - I [TION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PER. 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT RVIik_96__ The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, tivirele s telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan.* to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) r� Si mature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAUT, PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT RE , �9��-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sinning this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. `f NH �t A-V L lS- U 1L Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -' 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96T9 f,FIR The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireles telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 115 ."; '02 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sio-nina this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city o Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanLyec to another use. Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Si nature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG 96-10 AND DE NDITIONAL USE PERMIT PMENT REVIEW 96-9 .97 n, :02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. A L 5 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST IZEW " 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 ::-PR � 5 '11 :02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96- 0 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition -is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changec to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.,: ;.. 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 APR 15 r.1, 02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. _ i� U r Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) Sianature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST `CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND REVFjLQP-MENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chana to another use. r7 esident I Property Owner Name (Printed) 1 � _nature y sZ 1JAri ry S P/ - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 i ` - - ...,L:.. PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96U9 °":1 'C2 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 425 84 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature tr 4,�,te; 7J •� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERM T 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW M -W!' a,. �3 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc of radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident /-Property Owner Name (Printed) i Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 TION AG. 96-10 AN •97 "PR I5 1 A INST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT D DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property 1s located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. / Property Signature C --- Vr ame (Printed) Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirelels telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 #o radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by siEnin2 this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code recardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chancye to another use. t / Property Owner lame (Printed) S1, C' e 4 Residence Addre s ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 TITION AGAINST: CONDITIONAL USE Y.Lfi NII t ,11 -03 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 ` The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) Sianature ,L4 Def Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION A IC 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wire telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. &RR 15 1 :03 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city, of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chap to another use. s Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signa re 42,0 Carioll-11 Dr - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONI ITIVINAL UAL r&M 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT RE ESV' 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resi ent 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 1.7 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 W C 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 f0c t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners withi a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B, - zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature U Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. (300 U Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Residence A ss ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST 96-14 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners witl a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the; city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond L zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change( to another use. Reside t -/.Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. C; /�� OX)OV6fr Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature -//:3 � r Residence Address (� umber, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ON AGAINS 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersianed resident / property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. rJZIS�i(� % C%•�% Lfl�C� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. L c/- A h Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature �ZIJa e- O ✓< Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERM IT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sibnincr this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond I ar zoninc, code recardin� Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) I-Sianature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 4 l Signature Residence Address-/( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PEI 96-14 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners witl a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamonc Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond F zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident 1 Property S i anature (Printed) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 s ar T - ON AGAINST CONDITIONAL UNE rra XT"-nUXTVnUMFNT RFVTFW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( N ber, Stream _ Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 L; PETITI )N AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE P1 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT _REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wi in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be char, to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i 2nature Al Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ON AGAINST CONDITI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sinning this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. � l 1 Resident / Property Owner fame (Printed) Signature Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - PETITION A 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners with a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanaei to another use. f .J Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) n 1 ~ Signature 4 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT .REVJEW .96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. ,,-NT746 i f%C J - -L ,S Al W Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG 'T CONDI' 96-14 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wire telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our - residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) St -nature Residence Addres-9 ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 rTTION A( -1 LI NST COND DEVELOPM The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96 -9 - The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident 1 Property Ow4r Name (Printed) `_S' _nature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIO. 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wi in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing th s petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamo d Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chant d to another use. ! L /3 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 7.v. Signature � l� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PEI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature = Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST C 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this Petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. on ultct �1 ua--� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature AUG c�- Residence Address ( Number, Stree Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDTI`IO 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. _A Zvi�e,13 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) r�'l�✓Il� f�,I�f Signature �W t Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 TITION AGAINST Q ITIONAL U 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wi a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within tht city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing th petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamox Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan to another use. LLC c. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 Ui TION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE FLI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing, this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ON AGAINST CONDITIONAL 96-I0 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thin, petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i., located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 0 PE )N AGAINST CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i anature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) L L Signature Residence Address ( Number, Stmt) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PE TION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PEI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. wfi 1-S Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) _ Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 __ PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit iin a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. l Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature V Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 FA PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW.. 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. Resident!/ Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature J � _ Residence Address ( Number, Street) n - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CON ITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wilhin a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby bysigning this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-1.0 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be Chan, to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) r S i anature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property r SiLynature Name (Printed) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan to another use. Resident / Prope6y Owner N me (Printecj' Signat re Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 J _- )N AGAINST COND 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. r -IZ-1,4 Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Dom' _St Z -r✓ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ti PETITION AGAINST CONDITI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chap to another use. 1rL' S 1 OJ S �A v, 'i / Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PETITION AGAINST 'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Z6G 16 J!;�t 91� N;-tw Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature ��✓ CJS �� �.� `�L ���f`L�:�� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST COND A 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wi a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within thf city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing th petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamox Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chap to another use. r -41 � /� : n 1,2 J") Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 21) Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) 'Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG. 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property V located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang( to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature - Z ' �, -/- fes/ A,• C7, �-Zx "!t -' Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 N AGAINST CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. e: Al ------------ Resident I Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature I � Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo+ radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi! petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon( Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond 1 zoning code retarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be Chan.ge, to another use. Resident l Property Owner Name (Printed) .r Si6nature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 'Par PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. Ai+ Resident / roperty Owner Name (Printed) Signature - Sa0C` zfJ Residence Address ( Number, Street) .IJ Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chance to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) — g 4t,s' Signat�re Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 N AGAINST CONDITION -10 ANDD We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Re dent l Property Owner Name (Printed) Ilk SSia-nature �. Residence Ad ress ( Number, Street) -- Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - PETITION AGAINST CO 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 f radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wi a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing th petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamox Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i anature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PE ON AG :ONDITI( 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed I- to another use. t s Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sianature ;I — �-�: gin, �� •" �. Residence Address { Number, Street} Diamond Bar, Ca 91765. `ION AGAINST CONDITIONAL 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo Dt radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code retarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanac to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Z Signature 40S S- L" '?, ry v Lu Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 IA PETITION AGAINST CONDITION 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) U Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 -� _ PETITION AGAINS ONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of DiamondBar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. -- f Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities I antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property 1s located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. J Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature -�-- Residence Address ( N`umber, Street}, Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 N AGAINST CONDITI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond E ar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chance V to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i o ature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / P-roperty Owner Name (Printed) �ignature , Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL US 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fool radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners with) a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond & zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chap-ae to another use. Resident I Prope'ret-Qwner Name (Printed) Signature �k�, , a -Z 0" 1 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing, this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning, code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. ti Resident / Propert Owner ame ( rinted) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST GOND 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc of radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 9 -10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. C-'- E� F �/ --) � `d -t 6 h lXl&),:=-cKo Resident 1 Property Owner Name (Printed) Signatur Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION A AL 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners with: a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B; zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Vq Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 /Y� PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sianature II 5 D11 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST M 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners wit in a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan to another use. .c%vim Z f +� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) l v��vl �1 ✓ �' Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 7 - Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) ell Signature _ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST COND i� 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners with a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chancre to another use. Resident / Property 0w1fejName (Printed) Signature `- /l�CcJ?'e-L f1 r Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 TION AGAINST CONDITIONAL U�& rhI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. `'�• c 't N Prlll- Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) f Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91.765 �J - PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PEI 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. 0 � 'J'J le/ Resident /--Property Owner Name (Printed) Signa ure s . r%., L i:� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 T'1 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE .PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. L 1 of Z�7 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) -11�=4 d Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 F PETITION AGAINST CONDITIO 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele�s telecommunications transmission, facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, Califomia , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanLre to another use. ?Aj Cf 1 FC ii'�C Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed -: to another use_ si nt /Property Owner Na . e (Printed) . Signature r;- Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG 96-1 _ ►I �I, T CONDITIONAL USE TELOPMENT REVIEW The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireles telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 f Traand ct owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries 2584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commissiond f the the cityi1 of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law an Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 9E and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 lut ;d PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. ' �0' Nomf Resident / Property wner Name (Printed) Signature - -, Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 D;,o �b7- &f; V ro,,Z- 31171,5771 PETITION AGAINST COND U 96-14 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele s telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fc radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cid of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 9( and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. Resident / weer Name (Printed) Signatgre' \ \. 1 A<ZResidence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. :1 -7,T L a� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) - Signature L 7 --a i5,; Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST N 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chang to another use. f7%� s fir �M/2-_ ',E -I.5 V Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si ,natufe Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) r Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) r. Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AG. NDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chan-ae to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si anature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 n ar PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a-500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. - <' '. br o/ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 4, 1 ICII 1c5� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST COND W 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirele telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident I property owner within the 500 f t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of theCit17 of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chane to another use. /I,L -p pi/ - U S/V Resident / weer Name (Printed) Signature JDX Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 96-10 AND DEVEOPMLNT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. I NJ'A T -- 9,,AKit Resident / Property Owner Name rinted) Signature i Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIO 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 fo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners wit a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing thi petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond ar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Lu Signatur6'/' y/� ;�i�•1-.L J- t./,7,./it Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) ��LA,e-Cr.�I ,A�s��� r Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bara 91765 I N AGAINST. COND 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within tract 42554 and owners witt a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamon Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond E ar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. r��c�����,� _ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature v Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 --_- PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW. 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Alalvk-1 9A1/r4 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) ( Z1. r� /� - � � Signature Gas Residence Addre 's ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 = TITION AG. S 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foo radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners with: a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond B zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. TgYwi �eVRri3v� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 4� J---4� Signature ��..,�- Residence kddress ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 0 A g"�- LA /-) (t Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 0,2 'j��J 0 C'�/- Signature 3ir Pk' r Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITION.A►.L USE 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireles telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar. California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96- 10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change, to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S � bnature G/i2 ,4i2yz1,'7-n u lam'/ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. L VI An Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) ll 4I I ianature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 .. , PE X AGAINST CONDITI 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wirel telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident 1 property owner within the 500 fo t radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the cit of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96110 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chane to another use. L\L__A Resp ent /Property Owner Name printed) L4Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 M PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96 -10 -AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident! Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature - - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITION. 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foc radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners witl: a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond F zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be change to another use. ga-moL qlKww"k Res d nt I pr perty Owner Name (Printed) Signature _ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 0 I AM OPPOSSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: REDUCED VIEW APPEARANCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD _v/—POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD V REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES V REVISED CONSTRUCTION PLANS (Original Plan Was To Have Antennas Placed Down In The Gully Where They Would Not Be Seen From Armitos Place. The New Plan Places The Antennas In A Two Story Building On Armite Place At Street Level). OTHER (Please Specify) Print Name MPRV E10 Signature -� + lf,fy AA " t;\.Y " Address r - l-- DiPMOrOD BRA, CA Q1705- a I AM OPPOSSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. --- REDUCED VIEW APPEARANCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD y' POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES REVISED CONSTRUCTION PLANS (Original Plan Was To Have Antennas Placed Dorn In The Gulf Where They Would Not Be Seen From Armitos Place. The New Plan Places The Antennas In A Two Story Building On Armitos Place At Street Level). OTHER (Please Specify) Print Namet7. bl 14 r r" Signature Address I AM OPPOSSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: REDUCED VIEW -Z APPEARANCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES REVISED CONSTRUCTION PLANS (Original Plan Was To Have Antennas Placed Down In The Gully Where They Would Not Be Seen From Armitos Place. The New Pian Places The Antennas In A Two Story Building On Place At Street Level), OTHER (Please Specify) r Print Name - Z ef Z 4- LA/ci o&z r z Signature Qr4 Ccz Address !' 1 AM OPPOSSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AT 24401 DARRiN DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS; REDUCED VIEW APPEARANCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD Z— POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD V/ REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES REVISED CONSTRUCTION PLANS (Original Plan Was To Have Antennas Placed Down in The Gully Where. They Would Not Be Seen From Armitos Place. The New Plan Places The Antennas In A Two Story Building On Armitos Place At Street Level). OTHER (Please Specify) Print Name �'1f3 I- E' but Signature Address 3 -LT --L Mi�TL-)s r I AM OPPOSSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: -/ REDUCED VIEW APPEARANCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES REVISED CONSTRUCTION PLANS (Original Plan Was To Have Antennas Placed Down In The Gully Where They Would Not Be Seen From Armitos Place. The New Plan Places The Antennas In A Two Story Building On Armita Place At Street Level). OTHER (Please Specify) Print Name �- Signature Address C /A R '44 r PA In -, y9 3HR, C4 7 1765- 171 C. Section 2.07 of the Original Declaration sets forth certain restrictions on antennae and rooftop appliances. The undersigned Owners, by execu of this First Amendment, desire to amend Section2.07 of the Original Declaration in certain respects with regard to Lot 51 only, subject to certain conditions as set forth below. D. Capitalized terms set forth in these recitals and the operative provisions set forth below shall have the same meaning as such terms set forth and in the Original Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Owners of seventy-five (75%) or greater of the Lots within Tract 42584 do hereby amend the Original Declaration in the following respects only: follows: Section 2.07 of the Original Declaration is amended to read as "Section 2.07 Aitennae;-Rooftop Antennae;-RooftopA fiances. With the exception of one (1) television antenna installed in a manner designed to mitigate the obstruction of views and avoid unnecessary aesthetic impact, no radio antenna, aerial, C.B. antenna, television antenna or other facilities for the reception r transmission of radio or television signals or other means of communication shall be erected, installed or maintained on any Lot, except totally within a Dwelling Unit with no exterior evidence thereof or in underground conduits. A master antenna or cablevision antenna may be provided for the use of all Owners and Grantor may grant easements for such purposes. In addition, r o improvements, appliances or other installation shall be permittc d on the roofs of Dwelling Units, unless installed in a manner so as z tot to be visible from other Lots or streets, and approved in writin by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of t fis Section 2.07 and Section 2. 10, installation of commercial wire ss telecommunication facilities may be permitted on Lot 51. 2. In all other respects, all other Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions contained in the Original Declaration shall remain in full force and effect. 3. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts with appropriate notarial jurat affixed thereto_ (SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES) -2- Recording Requested by: cc -r- C.— s4 - When Recorded Mail To: 'L") \k a \ r� fit. CA %-76f— (Space Above this Line for Recorder's Use) FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SOUTH COUNTRY TRACT 42584 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRIC'T'IONS AND'RESERVATION OF EASMENTS FOR SOUTH COUNTRY TRACT NO. 42584 ("First Amendment") is made by the undersigned Owners of seventy-five percent (75%) or greater of lots 1 through 65, inclusive, of tract No. 42584, as shown on a Subdivision Map recorded on October 27, 1983 in book 1024, pages 6 to 14, Inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder ("Tract 42584")_ This first Amendment is made with respect to the following facts: PREAMBLE A. On February 24,1984, South Country Corp., a California corporation, caused to be recorded a Declaration of Covenams, Conditions and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for South Country Tract 42584 as Instrument No. 84-233763 in the Official Records of the Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County, California ("Original Declaration") for lots 1 through 65 of Tract 42584. B. Pursuant to Section 6.01 of the Original Declaration, the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in the Original Declaration run with the project, as defined in the Original Declaration, and are binding and enforceable by all Lot Owners of Tract 42584 for a period of fifty (5 0) years after the recordation of the Original Declaration and shall be automatically extended for a successive ten (10) year periods unless, by a written instrument signed by the Owners of seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots and at any time thereafter Recorded, the Owners determine to change the Original Declaration in whole or in part. /(a/z L1 Dat (J/ -Z, 6I5,6 Date "W14M A Owner of Lo 2 - Owner Owner of Lot Z CZ71Z Datb Signature Owner of Lo I C/1- (JI llixz Dat Signature Owner of Lo D STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF On 1 [� —a G - Q _ before me, Public, personally appeared h Inn personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be he person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg d to me that lie/they executed the same in l their authorized capacity(ies), and behal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Is Bobbi D. Haynes Signature of Notary LS +r"• 9938 NOTARYPUBLIC OCAUFONNiAni LOS ANGELES COUNTY Comm. Exp. Jure 6.2000 Dat Sign Owner of Lotil— I &-ey �� 'Datd Signature 7 U Date Signature Date Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF Owner of Lot Owner of Lot 7 Owner of Lot On 1 O - Q -q. °L C before me, a Notary personally appeared .r /e personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ialare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4ef�they executed the same in h64Wtheir authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. JI -Notary [Se r - Bobbi D. Haynes C 0 Comm. 05 00038 NOTARY PU LIC CAL►FGRNIA t LG6 ANGELES COpN7Y i Comm. Exp. June S. 20OC Date �b Date Date Date r i �I Nom' Signature Owner of Lot �a Signature J Owner of Lot Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF On - before me, Public, personally appeared � o✓t Owner of Lot Owner of Lot 12 - personally 7 personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be tie person(s) whose name(s) mare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that haWwJthey executed the same in l 64w/their authorized capacity(ies), and b ahat of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. otary [Seal Bobbi D. Haynes 0 Comm. #%0.99936 NOTARY PulaLm cAuFORHu^" LA AuarMs COUNTY `17 Comm. exp, June B, 2$00 '� 1 I 0/i �jf L Date Signature Owner of Lot -21 Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Date Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF toS Owner of Lot Owner of Lot On � G - p- r - R G before me,, , cz a Notary Public, personally appeared #`-'�: L �c z _a n4 �"�y •`v -c— personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) flare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thata/they executed the same in h64w/their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1 Signature of Notary [Se Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. Y7090638 NOTARY PLiCLIC CA�IFOANIA LOC AWILi0 COUNTY tJ conte. Exd. SWM $, 2000 fcIZL Jb Date 4,4. Signature Owner of Lo 3 3 Date Date Date ignature Owner Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF Owner Owner of On - - Q C. before,, me, a N Public, personally appeared f-�- k✓ti 3; personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be be person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowled to me that h*sl*Ahey executed the same in l ltheir authorized capacity(ies), and behal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary [SSI T '., . Bobbi D. Haynes 3 U . Comm. 01099938 ^ NOTARY PUBLIC GAMFORNIA6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY "I Comm. Exa. Juno S. 2000 i Date Aignarbk Date Date Date Signature Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Owner of Lot Owner of Lot Owner of Lot Owner of Lot On J -a a CrS� before me, L— a Notary Public, personally appeared -,— +� personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( whose name(e) is!are sebsegbad to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ke�,she4hey-executed the same in hi-AerAhek authorized capacity(k*, and behalf of which the person( -s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. +- R 4 Bobbi 0. Haynes g Signature of NotarySeal] Comm. #1099938 ^ NOTARY PUQUC CALIFORNI ut LOB AN09LBS COUNTY Comm. Exp. Juna 6, 2000 i D/2 L, fZ)P �-Z,7 Date I Signature Owner of Lo Date Date Date Signature Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) } ss. COUNTY OF On 1 C -„.nS. - q C ; be ore me, \r Public, personally appeared -VL t,) Ey Owner Owner C'RP - personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be 1 he person(} whose name(o isffe'subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hel4mAb&y-executed the same in hi&%eeth& authorized capacity(4*, and I ehal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary (Se Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. *1099938 ^ +� NOTARY MUC CALWORN1�w, LDS ANGELES COUNTY [1 Comm_ EYP. June G. 2000 'i Date Signature Owner of Lot- Date Sign tore Owner of Lot j Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss. COUNTY OF Owner of Lot On Gbefore me, 'D Notary Public, personafty app ared an L )r-,, CZ VS -_ - - Pers Wally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) iWare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hekA elthey executed the same in l wr/their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary [Seal] U ,.. -. Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. #1099888 0 NOTARY OVALIC CAMFOANII� LM ANGELS =UNTY � l COR1m. pxp. Jens /, 2000 t a 2 I, Date C 6 i Date ijaie Date � r Signature Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF On p - a - Ck C. before me, Public, personally appeared , Owner of Lot Owner of Lot L-5 0 Owner of Lot Owner of Lot personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be flie person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge to me that464telthey executed the same in h/their authorized capacity(ies), and b hat of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _ Bobbi D. Haynes 3 Signature of Notary Comm. #1099938 s NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNUQ LO$ ANGELES COUNTY %f Comm. Exp. Jura E, 2000 i Date Si4nature Owner of Lot Date Lj Signature Owner of Lot 2 3 Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature Owner of Lot STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Las a N G SE,�- ) On 1(� - D. -G - q C before me, — a Notary Public, personally appeared c personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)idare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he4k/they executed the same in lisher/their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes U `Gomm. #1099938 0E W NOT A" PUBLIC CAUFOFINUI,- LOS ANGELES COUNTY fill comm. Exp. Juno $. 20flfl Ltrft2 �� �:: � Signature of Notary Date / Signature Owner of Lo Date Signature Owner of Lo Date i Owner of Lo Z Z 16 Date Signature Owner of Lo a � t O NAV tier STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF \ _oma Ah<«[ [� On 1 L, - Q `� - q C before me, N Public, personally appeared Z -a e -S y "'-1, personally known to me of proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be he person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribe&to the within instrument and acknowled d to me that a/they executed the same M c their authorized capacity(ies), and behal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Bobbi D. Haynes [Se �:: Comm. *1099938 m� wN NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORPIIA�� LOS ANGELES COUNTY �+ C �,'. Comm. EXP. unto. 2000 1 Date I Signature Owner of Lot ( c-, 11 !- Date Signature Owner of Lot -37 Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature Owner of Lot STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss_ COUNTY OF } On G - G - Ci Co before me, fi, p. Notary Public, personally appeared .e a.q.l personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person{} whose narne(o) War.& subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshefffiey executed the same in him authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s}acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes [Seal] _ NOTARY Pu0L a1°eAL RORN LOG ANCCL1i C011N7Y �� i� Signature of Notary r, Date Signature Date Signature Date Date Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF On \ Q - Z 1., - q (; before me, Public, personally appeared '1�3%vvv,3 Owner of Lot Z' - Owner of Lot ��2t- Owner of Lot Owner of Lot personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be i he person(s) whose name(s) flare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg to me that he4s4ethey executed the same in hfteir authorized capacity(ies), and t ehal- of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature [Se Bobbi D. Haynes ; Comm. 01099938 Q NOTARY Pu8L1C CALIFORNIA;. _i LOS ANGELES O Nrf '41 F Comm. Exp. Jane 8.2000 i Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature Owner of Lot Dat �� gnature Owner of Lot T Date Signature Owner of Lot STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF pS & +.cam} On 1 G - ZG —q G before rne,��-_--1v �.1 c� ,a Notary Public, personally appeared �.� �} �•...� _ �C1.�a personally known to me or proved to me oi(the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) isfare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that #�they executed the same inef/their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. `:�r" Bobbi D. Haynes ; Signature of Notary [Seal]C., Comm.0109aws ' NOTARY PUBLIC CiALIRORNI Q t? LOS ANdiGLQa COUNTY C4ZM;A 9xR. Jarn00 : 9000ih Date Signature Owner of 10-1 Z Date 10/,; 2G Date 4,h / Date Owner Owner of Signature Owner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF On ti .0 - Z �,- 9C- beforee, _ d . [-� t�1 �� NC Public, personally appeared lt. C - k --� al personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be t ie person(s) whose narne(s) i!are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that bare/they executed the same in�/their authorized capacity(ies), and b hal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes Signature of Notary [Seal] U 2T ' `�' Comm.169993e ^ NQTAR7 PUBLIC PORN1�w LOS ANCiELB6 CCUNFv " comm. a P. June 6, 2000 D to i ignature Owner of Lot / L /-) ler f, Date f` Signature Owner of Lot 1 xkL LL�d ate 'Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss- COUlvTY OF t cis t.�c_ �'� ) Owner of Lot On > 1 - Z - 9 Co before me, — a Notary persarift appeared personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) -s/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h&Ww/they executed the same in l /their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. °�.-.. Bobbi D. Haynes [S Comm. #1099938 � NOTARY puSUG GAwFOANt1y� Los ANGELES COUNTr ``++ Comm. Exp. June 6, Signature of Notary f 1 1.,7 -11 q �- Date Date Date Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Owner of Owner of Owner of Owner of On � 1 — a- -R G before me, ti r), \--� AY a N( Rc personally appeared _��v �,Jd CIT—V6!r) personally known to me or prdved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be 1 person(s) whose name(s) isdare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge me that 44x! they executed the same in lis4witheir authorized capacity(ies), and t of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes 1 "x �_Q I p Signature of Notary Comm, 1QOD838 [Se NOTAFGY IN&r. CALIOGAN 0 LOS ANOSLSS COUNT* e Comm. aw JUAG B, 20001 15—q to k � Da Signature Owner of Lot f 2 3 Date' Silature Owner of Lot Date Signature Owner of Lot- . e Signature7 Owner of Lot" STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Ss. COUNTY OF La- On l 1- 1 _c Cbefore mei, LD• aN tary lic, personally appeared personalty known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4&lsh hey executed the same in-mf/their authorized capacity(ies), and behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi 6 Haynes Comm. 01099938 f NOTARY PURLkC CAUFORN X .. c LOS ANOCLEB COUNTY k` Comm. Eza. Juno E, 2000 i SIG Signature of Notary D to Signature Owner Date Signature Owner of Lc t z� C Date Owner of L t / [J4(,) 'Date Si re Owner of Lc t STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Ss. COUNTY OF On before me, -3 Public, personally appeared personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Aare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowled ed to me that ha4ke/they executed the same in iim4ekheir authorized capacity(ies), and behal of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument_ WITNESS my hand and official seal. ��L3C5-'fin � t Bobbi D• Haynes Signature of Notary t �Comm. NS09�639 (Seal] Q µpTARY fV ANC12 4 pµtFORRI comm ttRL4y a � � t1 Date Date Signature Owner of Lot Z5 Signature Signature Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF Owner of Lot Owner of Lot Owner of Lot On � 1 - a- Q G _before me,a Notary Public, personally appeared ralef personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(&) whose nam*) isfre-subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s4e4hey executed the same in him authorized capacity(, and behalf of which the person(-} acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �'p C'7-�er�--L Signature of Notary [Se Bobbi D. Hayrnes Comm. #1099938 C NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIAO C ' LOS ANC,ELEs C0UNT V 0 Comm Erp..7UM 6, 2000 i if l +� k1 9.(.. Date *: Date Date (? � - 1� (, Date SUBSCRIBING WITNE,1 C Signature Owner Si ature Owner /�- Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Owner of Owner of On - —'� C. before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the c personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose subscribed to the within instrument, as witness thereto, who, be' by me duly s< deposes and says that he was present and saw Mfi% L *'ZrE is the same persons described in and whose names are subscn`bedt(?the withinandamLexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, and that said affiant subscribed his nune to t thin instrument as witness at the request of WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes _ ,f1_S U ` Comm, mossm `"' . HOTAPY PUOCrC CUTFORN] Bobbi D. Haynes _ cap ANcQa MUNTY Comm. axP: JUAQ E. 2000 (' Date Signa re 6 Owner of Lot 4LZI-1a, 9. Dae Signature Owner of Lot IrA gt� LlLi Dae Signature wner of Lot 26 I �)l I 'L Da e SUBSCRIBING WITNE f ignature Owner of Lot SS: Eric STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On \a -I � r cl (o , before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally Down to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, as witness th reto, w , being b d ly sworn, doses and says that he was present and saw J2, "t ::f CCS _ the same persons described in and whose names are subscribed to the within and annexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, and at sal ant subscriname to the within instrument as witness at the request of_' r i co; WITNESS my hand and official seal. i D. Haynes Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. $1099938 OTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNL/�fl,, L0S ANGEM C04,1M Y k 7 Comm. Exp. June $, 2000 t C. ! j l � ►1 S - Date Signature Owner of Di4te Signature Owner of Date Signature Owner of Dai STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Owner On �— I 1 - °� �, before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose subscribed to the within instrument, as witness thereto, who, being by me duly ss dues ai 4 says that lye was present and saw the same persons described in and whose names are subscribed to the within and a instrument as a party thereto execute the same, and hat said affiant su scribed his the within instrumgnt as witness at the request of WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes Comm.#1099928 OTAAY PUSUC C"IFORN LOS ANGELES COUNTY tl Comm. W. Juni 4, 2000 Bobbi D. Haynes 3B is to 543 Date Signature Owner of Lot Date Signature Owner of Lot N Date Lz�ff Date SUBSCRIBING WI74e: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Owner of Lot Owner of Lot On I a— � y -q Ce , before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, as witness reto, who, being by me duly sworn, deposes and says that he was present and saw V Ohi the same persons described in and whose names are subscribed to the within and annexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, an t said affiant subscribed his name to tthin ' strument as witness t the request of i p WITNESS my hand and official seal. D. Haynes Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. *1099938 OTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 Comm. EXP. Juror 8.2000 Signature 2 IO) 1k Dat -�4 IDat SUBSCRIBING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Owner of Lo L Owner of LoZ— Owner of Lo� Owner of Lo On _VZ -_1 1 -Ci a before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose subscribed to the within instrument, as witness o, who, being VONA duly st d s and says t he was present and saw -� Qi Sr\, is the same persa escribed in and whose names are subscribed to the within and ann xed instrument as a parry thereto execute the same, an said affiant subscnl# his name to the within instrument as witness at the request of aT -3-- , WITNESS my band and official seal. Bobbi D. Hayne G _ Comm. #1099938 © NOTARY PUAL 0 0µ1F01 Bobbi D. Haynes "N���a omm z r. Date I -L---2 4 ' Date C! /5 Dat SUBSCRIBING. n Signk4ure Owner of Lot � 3 Owner of Lot q3 Owner of Lot Z 1 ignature : Owner of Lot y WITNE / Eric S STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On \ a _ I . — 9 (;� _, before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, as witness theret , who, being by me d}aly sworn, doses and spys that he was present and saw A/ v the same persons described in and whose narAes fle suliscribea to the within and annexed instrument as a parry thereto execute the same, and that id affiant subscr'bqd his name to "'thin "ent as witness at the request of WITNESS my hand and official seal. bbi D. Haynes Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. v099938 DTARY PU13UC OWFORM. LOS AVS COU r Comm. Ftp. June fi. 2000 Date -SignatUre Owner of Lo 2 Date Sigiature Owner of Lo rf t7 1a /jo .� Date Signature Owner of Lo 5a STATE OF At, Dar tore Owner of Lo 5 -z - G WITNESS E ,Sto CALIFZ4 M COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On 1 Zi - 1 ! - c ` G , before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the Stat , personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose nar ie is subscribed to the within instrument, as witness tleryto, who beinj& by me duly swo deposes spys that he was present and saw t"'kL .Q { v D2. )An. � -,-N :. J^ n... the same persons described in and whose names are subscribed to the within and armexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, an4,th1at said ed hisn eto t/h�j within ' rument as witness at the request of J%A Vg:%bZ'b = Ver c`y 05 U o o WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes Carttm. #fit 099938 //�� ,,w % NOTAAY PUALIC CALIFORNL� Bobbi D. Haynes `' LOS AN43ELSO COUNTY '`0 Comm EXP, JUMI 0.200 Signature gnature \-L- 9 Datek Signaturc� Date 4Signature ,-� Z�� 1, �0 Diit l: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Owner of Lot -�Y Owner of Lot 7 Z' Owner of Lot 7 ) Owner of Lot On - -gambefore me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, as witness thereto, who, bei,n, y me k tworn, dAposes� anti Ms t� at_he was present and sa z_,& the same personglescribed in and whose names are subscribed to the within and annexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, an t d t b his name to .�fssi��� _c WITNESS my hand and official seal.. Bobbi D. Haynes Bobbi D. Haynes ` Comm. 43086838 OTARY PUB41C CUIFORNLC WS RNOELfl9 COUNTY W Comm. Exp. Juno 8.2000 :4 Date I Sig6iture Q- 1, () Pil PA. z L Dat Signa e 1 1� ate 1 < < Dat SUBSCRIBING Owner of Lot 4 / Owner of Lot STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } Owner of Lot On 1 a 1 1 - C� G , before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscrniW to the within instrument, as witness thereto who, y me duly sworn, dam.°des ,says haat he \w present and saw J t C3 \/L. the same persons described in and whose names are subscnbed to the within andann ed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, and t d affi bscribed his a to the w}tW*"9 t as 4tTess at the request o J c WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bobbi D. Haynes Bobbi D. Haynes Comm. #IWA38 01 PiJB(JC CAUFORNII�� LOs ANGELES COt1" U Comm. Exp. June 6.2000 :• Datignature Owner of Lot �LL Dat Signature Owner of Lot S Z � Hate Signature Owner of Lot Ll Dat STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Owner of Lot / / On _ ZL - 1 1 - 9 Co , before me, Bobbi D. Haynes, a Notary Public for the State, personally appeared Eric Stone, personally known to me to be the person whose name is the same persons described in and whose names are subscribed to the within and annexed instrument as a party thereto execute the same, and that said affiant f ibed his name to tk} wft en: as witness at the reqs ue�fl�� c�LQ n ,0,_r J SC*I\ r �--� r►n��nr�2�3r1 WITNESS my hand and official seal. r �r�..:• Bobbi D. Haynes U Comm. 0102$938 Bobbi . Haynes �,,� Nas`zz!o I AHaELs cc NTN""� Ccrosn�8xp. Jn116 S. 2000 To'd -iuioi cocaA-...a,�e - - a aed - �:le zs�i-sly--u�r CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. "6, TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 7, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMM CATION FACILITIES. SUMMARY: On May 6, 1997, the City Council directed the preparation of a draft urg cy ordinance establishing a moratorium on the issuance of permits for wireless telecommunication facil ties. On May 20, 1997 the City Council received public testimony, discussed the proposal, and contin ed the matter to June 3, 1997. The issue before the City Council is whether or not to enact the propo ied ordinance. (Continued from June 3, June 17 and July 1, 1997) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption #f the urgency ordinance and direct staff as appropriate. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on Clerk's office) Ordinance(s) X Other: (see staff report Agreement(s) file in City attachments) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBIVHTTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been X Yes _ No reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? 415 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes --X— N Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X N Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terr nce L. Belang es DeStefan City Manager Deputy City M ager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manag4�1 er FROM: James DeStefano, Deputy City MaSUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLNG A MORAT RIUM ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNI TION FACILITIES (continued from June 3, June 17 and Jul 1, 1997) DATE: July 9, 1997 BACKGROUND: On May 6, 1997 the City Council directed the preparation of draft urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the iss ance of permits for wireless telecommunication facilities. On Maf 20, 1997 the City Council received public testimony, discussed tie proposal, and continued the matter to June 3, 1997. The Juna 3, 1997 discussion was postponed to June 17 and again to July 1 1997. The issue before the City Council is whether or not t enact the proposed ordinance. DISCUSSION: There are presently seventeen wireless communication facilit es constructed or approved within the City. Two applications hve been approved, but not yet constructed, to upgrade or expand existing facilities at the Radisson Hotel and the Torito Lan office building. Two development applications are in process for proposed facilities at new locations on Darrin Drive (Cox/PacBell), presently before the City Council, and at Peterson Park (LA Cellular). The Peterson Park proposal requests approval to attach an antenna to an existing ballfield light standard In addition, Metricom has submitted a proposal to utilize exist ng street light poles for a wireless data communications service. Inquires and applications have continued regarding the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities within the City of Diamond Bar. The City does not presently have a coordinated or Beta led requirements responding to issues related to the placement, location, and design of such facilities. Project applications are reviewed on a case by case basis. All applications for wireless telecommunication facilities require Development Re iew approval and most require Conditional Use Permit approval, however, there are no standards or guidelines responding to his Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council July 9, 1997 page 2 rapidly growing land use. The City is currently in the proc of preparing a comprehensive Development Code, scheduled for adoption in December 1997, which will include regulations addressing the placement of wireless facilities. The propos interim ordinance would guide the development of wireless telecommunication facilities for the City until such time as amendments to the existing Zoning Ordinance are adopted and effective. The proposed interim ordinance, as crafted, would prohibit consideration and/ or construction of all five applications process and any new proposal for wireless facilities until time as a new ordinance is adopted and effective. The City Council should examine the effect the proposed ordi ance will have upon the five pending projects (see map exhibit for listing and location). Exemptions include the construction f facilities for which approval was received, and made effective, prior to the establishment of the proposed ordinance. In accordance with Section 65858 of the Government Code the urgency ordinance requires approval by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. The interim ordinance shall be of no further [orce and effect forty-five (45) days from its date of adoption. pan conclusion of a noticed public hearing the Council. may, by a four-fifths vote, extend the interim ordinance. The City Attorney and staff have prepared urgency ordinance a at the City Council consider and modify appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: s a result of comments meeting of May 6, 1997 the proposed urgency o the attached draft and direction rece -ved . The Council may rdinance as deemed It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of the urgency ordinance and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments - Proposed Urgency Ordinance - Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Map TB/JDS:dbm ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND SM ESTABLISHING A K RATc3RI:.',S ON LAND i7S8 ENTITLEMNTS FOR WIRELESS COHNNTCATION FAC LITI,S AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OY DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY C RDAIY AS FOLLOWS: • Findings. A. Wireless teleCcxzunications is a rapidly growing and developinq technology that has led to a significant mend for wireless commtowers, antennas, related equipment and facilities Within the City of Diamond Bar. There are presentiy daventeen wireless telecommunication facilitie constructed or approved within the City of Diamond Sar, including both monopole facilities and root -mounted facilities; B. The City presently requires development r iev approval for every proposed wireless telecommunication fa ility. In addition conditional use permit approval is required f r all wireless coummnication facility applications proposed wit in agricultural, Residential, and certain Commercial and Ind atrial- zones. Wireless telecommunication facilities and towers re Permitted by right within the Restricted Heart' Manutactur nq aona. The City does not have any detailed standards to p aperly requlate and control the location, placement, and design t such facilities: C. Duo to evolving technology and changes in federal requlations in the Wireless communications indust for new and modified wireless communication facilitieshwi !amend continue to occur and proliferate within the near future; D. Evolving technology and transmitting needs have resulted in cantinuiM changes and adaptations in the des qn appearance of wireless COftunication facilities, and thea and circumstances have created a need to study the type of wi•lass communication facilities that are anticipated to be propo ed and their iapaets on the comunity, and to further determine I ov those fad411tias may beat be regulated and controlled to 1 rotect the public health, safety, and welfare Within the limits 4 f current Stall and Federal laws and regulations: a. one of the Stated goals of the Diamond ear General Plan is to assure an appropriate balance of land uses Vi. theadoptionhat thisiordinance willaservo totadvance slop nt: L: NVOLINQ1 8mm? the achievemant of`his goal 3s Nail as other General plan; goals of Council beF. lieve �thatsed on the statements cited provide saffieiet standards zoning regulations3bovo, the wireless cO�nication facilities, properly an do •Mists to develop9ulate and co. wireless communi ationyfaciAie$sivs Ordinancea need there. and screened, d rep.., to ensure cons tru that proper conditionsoaro'elY located, < etion and operation a! suchPlaced on tt a. tacil3tiesp modified wireless Of of fu Of Such Communication facilitier es for ah an ordinance could result in n prior to the a °fie iae be avoided or be more affoctively therefore consideration of fu e9ative impacts tha discontinued until such time as aPPlicatfonsisho d be a na�f ordinance is Council finds Based on the statements adopte< and Construction the current aha cited above, the Cj and C nstruction of wireless communicationlic of Cfacilitiaa the that the estabel ihme t oat to the f new anmad health, aafoty. and welfare fafeti* would result i ,.at to wireless common Safety* and welfare; n that threat to the Public healt 1. a moratorium onlnevsa• intent o! facilities b nd modified wirelesstc Council. to est< Y means of adopting this Ordcation etion bggs8anca pursuant to the n intar� effe It is intended that this of Government only until such time as moratorium remain may be studied, considered and adopted. Zoning measu Provided in Section�� herear, Exceptiu declares a moratorium on ,! Cit as other gradin the ishe Citnce cf D"m nd Bar hereb, 4 Derails. conditional use nq,permfts, ono changes, and any other develo permits' variances z the use, development or paant Permits and entitleme is facilities within m°ditication o! wireless c tA* City, omaunicati or in seetion�4 hereof • Except as otherwi or coda of th* Cit it Except any Other ordi: pmrmit, grsd�l Permit Diamond Bar, no application for a bui. permit, verl demolition permit, conditional use �r =Ona or entitles t'"!or sa — " , deVelopment permit or other pe Modification of wireless lcam ont' development, us* or accepted, process unicaticn facilities s environmental ed or iesuadr no anvironmantal assessmlent, eport exemption shat eet r , negative decluation or cat Prepared in convection with a agori any such W%"X'VWWWa"r -2- n ;i ty of trot ore that :signed, a low or Eoption might t design s an , and Lcation fish a iso for ding t application, Permit or entitlement; and no building, structure, or facility shall be constrscted, reconstructed, aetablisred, erected or placed during the term of the moratorium declared in section 2 hereof. For purposes of this ordinance, a "wireless communication facility" is defined as a structure that supports commercial antennae, microwave dishes and/or other related equipment that sends and/or receives radio frequency signals, whether mounted on the ground or on any portion of a structure or building. Section 4. Zzgntions. The moratorium or limit tion provided for in Sections 2 and 3 hereof shall not be appli able to any of the following: (a) Repairs or maintenance of existing stru urea or facilities within the original footprint of t e existinq facilities and which do not increase the facility size or height; (b) Establishment or construction of facilities for which final approval was received by the Planninq commission or the Community Development Director and effective prior to the affective data of this ordinance: (c) Minor modifications to an existing structure or facility required by law to be constructed ordar for the structure or facility to comply with ap licable fire, building or other safety requirements. Nothing contained in this section shall exempt r except any exempt construction or use frog any requiremen or regulation of this Building code, Zoning Ordinance, or othr ordinance of the city of Diamond Bar. In the event that ark is permitted to proceed under the terms of this Ordinance, -a I required permits shall be posted on site. Sgj=ign S. Savorability. If any part or provL this Ordinance, or the application -to any person or circa is hold invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, ineludin application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be effected and shall continue I force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Or are severable. seg -tion d. this ordinance shall constiViolation tute aasmisdeaeanor dpshallib punishable by a fine not to exceed $1.,000 or by imprisons County jail for not to exceed six (6) months,, or by both fine and imprisonnent. Each and every day such s violati exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation ordinance. In addition to the foregoinq, any violation o -3- t:�YOLS�MJ��T . ion of stance, the full inane of nt in uch n of this this- Ordinance shill; constitute a pub,, nuisance and snail to abatement as provided by all applicable provisions o law. AS set forth in the findings contained in Section l above,indiin City of Diamond Bar intends to conduct studies forthwith as the . appropriate Standards and requlations governing forthwith to communication facilities, and, if awireless adapt amendments tc the zoning ordinance regarding sato me. Pending such studies, and the preparation and adoption at the am nded Preservation recon o th it is necessary for the on of the preservation o! the public peace, health, safety and wet ars that no now or expanded wireleas coMMunication facilities be constructed or developed and that this ordinance take of ect immediately. If this ordinance does not take effect immediately, wireless communication facilities Will be undertaken Which may, be in conflict with the zoning regulations which are to be and adopted as above mentioned, incompatible with propos4d uses tudiid Of adjacent property, and detrimental to plwjoinq of the Community. the proper o Due to the foregoing ciroumstences� there is a and immediate threat to the public health, The approval current safet of additional Land use Y, and welfare. grading or demolition permits, or building, any orther'applicable� entitlement for construction or modification of wireless communication facilities would result in a threat to the health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, it is necessarylic Preservation of the public peace, health, this the safety and vlf ordinance take effect imstediately. This ordinance i interim ordinance r• that and shall expire forty-five (43) days a adoption thereof unless Oxtended an ter the pursuant to the provisiorls Section 6"58 of the GovOrnment Code of This is aA interim measure, adopted pursuant to authorization of State lav in the order to maintain the Istatu pending the completion of the Studios and adoption zoning quo o! ame regulations, or sooner. It is not a final dispose to development of any particular d ion as City. parcel of property withi the PASSED, IiLPMVSD AND 1lMMD this day of ` . l 97. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY clam L:1YOL t %JUWgm 1r _ 4 TOTAL P.,�5 ORDINANCE NO. 04 (1997) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING A MORA ORIi ON LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Fin dings. A. Wireless telecommunications is a rapidly gro ing and developing technology that has led to a significant demand for wireless communication towers, antennas, related equipment and facilities within the City of Diamond Bar. There are presently seventeen wireless telecommunication facilities constructed or approved within the City of Diamond Bar, incding both monopole facilities and roof -mounted facilities; B. The City presently requires development review approval for every proposed wireless telecommunication facility. In addition conditional use permit approval is required for all wireless communication facility applications proposed within Agricultural, Residential, and certain Commercial and Industrial zones. Wireless telecommunication facilities and towers are permitted by right within the Restricted Heavy Manufacturing zone. The City does not have any detailed standards to properly regulate and control the location, placement, and design of such facilities; C. Due to evolving technology and changes in fed ral regulations in the wireless communications industry, the dem nd for new and modified wireless communication facilities will continue to occur and proliferate within the near future; D. Evolving technology and transmitting needs hare resulted in continuing changes and adaptations in the design and appearance of wireless communication facilities, and these circumstances have created a need to study the type of wirel ss communication facilities that are anticipated to be proposed and their impacts on the community, and to further determine how these facilities may best be regulated and controlled to pro ect the public health, safety, and welfare within the limits of current State and Federal laws and regulations; E. One of the stated goals of the Diamond Bar General Plan is to assure an appropriate balance of land uses with respect to the location, intensity and quality of development; the adoption of this ordinance will serve to advance the achievement of this goal as well as other goals of the General Plan; L:\V0L1\MJ\DBM0Rk.afs F. Based on the statements cited above, the Cit Council believes that the current zoning regulations do not provide sufficient standards to properly regulate and control wireless communication facilities; and that a need therefor exists to develop a new comprehensive ordinance to ensure t at wireless communication facilities are properly located, des 'gn and screened, and that proper conditions are placed on the construction and operation of such facilities; G. Consideration of further applications for neu or modified wireless communication facilities prior to the ado tion of such an ordinance could result in negative impacts that night otherwise be avoided or be more effectively mitigated, and therefore consideration of further applications should be discontinued until such time as a new ordinance is adopted; H. Based on the statements cited above, the Cit Council finds that the current absence of controls on the design and construction of wireless communication facilities poses an immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that the establishment of new and modified wireless communication facilities would result in that threat to the public health, safety, and welfare; I. It is the intent of the City Council to establish a moratorium on new and modified wireless communication facilities by means of adopting this ordinance as an interim urgency ordinance pursuant to the provisions of Government C de Section 65858. It is intended that this moratorium remain i effect only until such time as other permanent zoning measur s may be studied, considered,and adopted. Section 2. Moratorium declared, Except as otherw se provided in Section 4 hereof, the City of Diamond Bar hereby declares a moratorium on the issuance of building permits, grading permits, conditional use permits, variances, zone changes, and any other development permits and entitlements for the use, development or modification of wireless communicatin facilities within the City. Section 3. Moratorium defined. Except as otherwi, provided in Section 4 hereof, notwithstanding any other ordi: or Code of the City of Diamond Bar, no application for a bui' permit, grading permit, demolition permit, conditional use permit, variance, zone change, development permit or other p� or entitlement for establishment, development, use or modification of wireless communication facilities shall be accepted, processed or issued; no environmental assessment, environmental impact report, negative declaration or categor: exemption shall be prepared in connection with any such application, permit or entitlement; and no building, structui or facility shall be constructed, reconstructed, established, erected or placed during the term of the moratorium declared L:\VOL1\MJ\DBMORAT.afs -2- ance ding cal in t Y Section 2 hereof. For purposes of this Ordinance, a "wireless communication facility" is defined as a structure that supports commercial antennae, microwave dishes and/or other related equipment that sends and/or receives radio frequency signal whether mounted on the ground or on any portion of a struct re or building. Section 4. Exemptions.. The moratorium or limitaion provided for in Sections 2 and 3 hereof shall not be applic ble to any of the following: (a) Repairs or maintenance of existing structures or facilities within the original footprint of th existing facilities and which do not increase the facility size or height; (b) Establishment or construction of facilities for which final approval was received by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director and effective prior to the effective date of this Ordinance; (c) Minor modifications to an existing structure or facility required by law to be constructed in order for the structure or facility to comply with applicable fire, building or other safety requirements; (d) Structures and facilities proposed to be erected in public rights-of-way or city -owned prop rty. Nothing contained in this section shall exempt or except any exempt construction or use from any requirement o regulation of the Building Code, Zoning Ordinance, or other ordinance of the City of Diamond Bar. In the event that worc is permitted to proceed under the terms of this Ordinance, all required permits shall be posted on site. Section 5. Severability. If any part or provisiom of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including t1le application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be effected and shall continue in f ll force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Ordinnce are severable. Section G. Penalty. Violation of any provision o this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in County jail for not to exceed six (6) months, or by both suc fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. In addition to the foregoing, any violation of this L:\V0L1\MJ\D8M0RAT.afs -3- Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided by all applicable provisions of law. Section 7. Statement of Purpose and Urgency Find n s. As set forth in the findings contained in Section 1 above, the City of Diamond Bar intends to conduct studies forthwith as to appropriate standards and regulations governing wireless communication facilities, and, if appropriate, to prepare a d adopt amendments to the zoning ordinance regarding same. P nding such studies, and the preparation and adoption of the amendEd zoning regulations, it is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfarE that no new or expanded wireless communication facilities be constructed or developed and that this ordinance take effec immediately. If this ordinance does not take effect immediately, wireless communication facilities will be undertaken which nay be in conflict with the zoning regulations which are to be stu ied and adopted as above mentioned, incompatible with proposed uses of adjacent property, and detrimental to the proper planninc of the community. Due to the foregoing circumstances, there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. The approval of additional land use permits, variances, building, grading or demolition permits, or any other applicable entitlement for construction or modification of wireless communication facilities would result in a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, it is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare that this ordinance take effect immediately. This ordinance is a interim ordinance and shall expire forty-five (45) days afte'r the adoption thereof unless extended pursuant to the provisions f Section 65858 of the'Government Code. This is an interim measure, adopted pursuant to th authorization of State law in order to maintain the status q10 pending the completion of the studies and adoption of amende zoning regulations, or sooner. It is not a final dispositio as to development of any particular parcel of property within the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July , 199'. ATTEST: CITY CLERK -4- L:\VOL1\MJ\©BMORAT.afs MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced al, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 15th day of July, 1997 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 15th day of July, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT:' COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ansari, Werner, MPT/Herr M/Huff None Harmony None Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 0 M RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAM BAR MAKING AN ELECTION PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33676 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HREBY FIND, RESOLVE, ORDER AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676, the City Council elects'to be allocated to the City off Diamond Bar, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated tD the City pursuant to subdivision (a) of Health and Safety Code Section 33670, the tax revenues allocated to the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section3670 attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of the City which levy occurs after the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area becomes effective. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1997. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamon Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the day of , 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City -&f- Diamond California 970529 10572-00001 rdh/gp 1672901 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency") has prepared a Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopm, Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area") and has recommended approval of the Redevelo- Plan by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar (the "Ci Council"). he !nt y nt SECTION 2. The Redevelopment Plan entitled "Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area," which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, is hereby incorporated by this reference. SECTION 3. As established in the Redevelopment Plan, the purposes and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area are to eliminate the conditions of blight existing in the Project Area and to prevent the.recurrence of blightefi conditions within the Project Area by undertaking all appropriate redevelopment projects pursuant to the Community Redevelopme t Law, California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et sea (the "Community Redevelopment Law"), including but not—limited to, providing public improvements and community facilities, providing for the rehabilitation of commercial structures, encouraging employment opportunities, and increasing, improv ng or preserving low and moderate income housing. SECTION 4. Based upon the record of the joint pub is hearing on the Redevelopment Plan, and the various reports a d other information provided to the City Council, the City Coulicil hereby finds and determines that: A. The Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment cf which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the Community Redevelopment Law. The Project Area is characterized by a combination of conditions th t are so prevalent and so substantial that it causes a reduction of, and lack of, proper utilization of the ar a to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical a d economic burden on the community which cannot be expect d to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. Approximately 65 percent of all buildings and 58 percent of all parcels suffer from one or more physical blighting condition. Approximately 49 percent of all buildings a d 39 percent of all parcels suffer from one or more economic 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 blighting condition. Overall, approximately 90 percent all buildings and 71 percent of all parcels suffer from or more physical and/or economic blighting conditions. addition, the Project Area is characterized by economic blighting conditions which are not site specific, such < declining building permit activity and retail sales tax revenues_ Conditions in the to, the following that cause blight: of one In Project Area include, but are not limited described physical and economic conditions Approximately 62 percent of the buildings (46 percent o: parcels) in the Project Area are in need of maintenance ranging from deferred maintenance to extensive rehabilitation. 132 buildings (53 percent) are in need deferred maintenance; 21 buildings (over 8 percent) are need of moderate rehabilitation, and one building is in of extensive rehabilitation. Conditions of deteriorate( include damaged exterior building materials, deteriorat( roofing material and eaves, sagging roofs, broken windoi nonstructural damage, chipped and peeling paint, expose( wiring and outdoor storage of materials and debris. Th( conditions cause the buildings to be unsafe or unhealthy persons to live or work and reflect a lack of investment property owners to maintain or improve their properties standard condition. The process of deterioration can be self-perpetuating; the presence of properties which exih- signs of deterioration deter owners of neighboring properties from improving or maintaining their propertie Approximately 27 percent of all buildings (17 percent o parcels) in the Project Area exhibit one or more Condit of defective design, including inadequate vehicular acc substandard building materials and inadequate loading a Inadequate vehicular access plagues the majority of the smaller retail centers in the Project Area. Typically, these centers provide very limited access points for business patrons. In addition, lack of or inadequate loading areas results in trucks loading and unloading i parking lots, often impeding access to businesses and restricting traffic flow, and resulting in potentially hazardous situations for business patrons. These condi also limit the potential for private sector development redevelopment to effectively utilize properties sufferi: from high vacancies, deterioration and defective design 24 percent of the buildings (17 percent of the parcels) the Project Area have one or more characteristic of substandard design, including obsolescence and outdoor storage and/or production. Commercial retail centers i Project Area are isolated, with virtually no freeway or major right-of-way visibility and limited access. The obsolete nature of the Project Area's strip retail cent 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 — 2 — the of in need )n !d FS, . :se for by in bit !S. all ons ss, 'eas . ions and in the and shopping centers (which are primarily smaller unanchored strip centers constructed in the 1970's and 1980's with little or no improvements or upgrades) has resulted in igh vacancies, high turnovers, profitability problems, and limited shopping opportunities for Diamond Bar residents. These limited opportunities have led to residents purch sing goods and services outside of the City, causing signifi ant retail sales leakage. Approximately 20 percent of the buildings (16 percent o parcels) in the Project Area do not have parking which is adequate to effectively conduct business and many of the older commercial buildings are built to the property limes. In addition to negatively affecting business operations the lack of parking interferes with vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Many of the light industrial and commerci 1 uses located in the Project Area also lack sufficient off street parking and, as a result, employees and patrons ELre forced to park along the streets, and in some cases residential streets, adjacent to these uses. Geotechnical hazards and problems, such as landslides aid critical flood control and drainage deficiencies, have impeded the adequate utilization of the land. Improvem nts are required to mitigate potential landsliding, floodinc and drainage problems, thereby discouraging investment in tie properties. 12 parcels are incompatible to adjoining or nearby uses. For instance, industrial uses surrounding Walnut Elementary School have resulted in a number of problems such as traffic and noise. The large volume of industrial traffic pose significant safety threats to school children traveling to and from school. 48 parcels (15 percent) located throughout the Project are irregularly formed and shaped and under multiple ownership. These parcels are a barrier to development because they are frequently difficult or impossible to without combining with other parcels. 10 of the 15 ret shopping centers (66 percent) are in multiple ownership Because of diversity of ownership, as well as small lot sizes, it is unlikely that the reuse or private redevelopment of deteriorated and obsolete properties w be possible without a land assembly effort. Secured assessed property values in the Project Area decreased by 11 percent from 1993-94 to 1996-97, compare a 3 percent increase in assessed valuation City-wide ant two percent decrease County -wide. Approximately 32 pert of all parcels in the Project Area have experienced decreases in property values over this same time period. Land prices throughout the Gateway Corporate Center have dropped by 50°s per square foot in the last year. 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 - 3 - rea se it 11 J to a ant From 1994 through 1996 only two building permits have b issued for new construction in the Project Area, with a total value of only $365,000. During this same time pe 9 building permits were issued in the City of San Dimas a total value of approximately $16 million, 55 building permits for new construction were issued in the City of Pomona with an approximate value of $20 million, and 30 building permits for new construction were issued in th City of Brea with an approximate value of $26 million. !en iod, with 6 sites in the Project Area have been identified by the California State Water Resources Control Board as havin leaking underground storage tanks. The high cost of remediation, particularly if the site is considered for a change of land use, makes the private development of these sites costly and problematic. The majority of the commercial businesses in the City are located within the boundaries of the Project Area. Taxable retail sales per capita in the City in 1994 was $3,023, which is among the lowest in the San Gabriel valley region. The retail sales per capita in surrounding cities, such as Brea, Chino and West Covina were $16,646, $6,895, and $6,722, respectively, representing per capita taxable sales that are approximately 100 percent to 500 percent higher. The City is experiencing significant retail leakage. A number of surveyed residents of Diamond Bar believe that. existing retail centers require improvements or upgrade.:. 67 buildings (27 percent), including over 150 tenant spaces, are partially or 100 percent vacant. Of these, 22 are commercial office, 13 are light industrial, and 32 are commercial retail. Retail, industrial and office vacancy rates in Diamond Bar are higher than in surrounding communities. Overall, the average vacancy rate for all Project Area retail centers is 24 percent while office vacancy rates range from 20 to 40 percent. The Project Area is characterized by inadequate public infrastructure, improvements and facilities, which contributes to the stagnation of the area's development and limits the use and reuse of existing commercial and industrial structures. Existing landscaping, streetsca ing, and public facilities are in need of upgrading or expanding to provide a pedestrian -friendly environment that encou ages business patronage and private sector investment. The conditions described above are causing and will increasingly cause a reduction of and lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that 't constitutes a serious physical and economic burden on te community (including decreased property tax revenues an 970527 10572-00001 oWs 1500109 — 4 — sales tax revenues) which cannot be expected to be reve sed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental act on, or both, without redevelopment. B. The Redevelopment Plan would redevelop the Project. Area in conformity with the Community Redevelopment Law and in he interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare. The implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will assist in the elimination of conditions of blight within the Project Area and prevent their reoccurrence. The Redevelopment Plan provides for the installation and construction of publi improvements. The Redevelopment Plan also provides for the rehabilitation of public and private structures. These improvements are essential to encouraging private investment and eliminating the conditions of blight in the Project Area and preventing their reoccurrence. .C. The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible. Under the Redevelopme t Plan, the Agency will be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including property tax increment revenues; the nature and timing of redevelopment activities will depend on the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment revenue generated in the Project Area; no redevelopment activity will be undertaken unless the Ag ncy can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity; and sufficient public and private financial resources, when taken together with tax increment revere e, will be available to carry out the proposed redevelopme t activities of the Agency. The Agency will issue its to increment bonds or other obligations payable from tax increment revenues only when such revenues are projectec to be available to the Agency in amounts sufficient to pay for the principal of, and interest on, such bonds. In addition, there are available to the Agency other methods of financing its redevelopment activities, including but not limited to bonds issued pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33750 or Section 33641(d). The Agency may receive fines cial assistance from the County of Los Angeles, State of California, the federal government, and any other public agency. As available, other funds also may be used to ray the costs of the Agency's redevelopment activities, including, but not limited to, Community Development Bl ck Grant funds. D. The Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar, including, but not limited to the General Plan's Housing Element, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, as set forth in the findings of the Planning Commission in its PC Resolution No. 97-5, adopt d on April 8, 1997 and its PC Resolution No. 97-8, adopte on 970527 10572-00001 ows 1500109 — 5 — May 27, 1997- The Redevelopment Plan proposes land use and public improvements contemplated by the General Plan an the goals and objectives of such Plan. E. The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan would promot public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City o Diamond Bar and would effectuate the purposes and polic of the Community Redevelopment Law. The implementation the Redevelopment Plan will assist in the elimination o conditions of blight within the Project Area. The Redevelopment Plan provides for the installation and co struction of public improvements, the rehabilitation of public and private structures, the removal of obsolete substandard structures, and the assemblage of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development. U the Redevelopment Plan the improvement of the public infrastructure, including the street and traffic circul system improvements will correct existing deficiencies. F. The condemnation of real property is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan, and adequate provi have been made for payment for property to be acquired provided by law. The assemblage of parcels for develop and the completion of the proposed public improvements involve real property acquisition. No real property wi condemned without the payment of compensation as requir law. Further, adequate moneys will be budgeted by the Agency for the acquisition of real property required by implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. G. Although the Agency intends to accomplish all redevelop pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan with as little displacement of families and persons as possible, the A has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of fam and persons displaced from the Project Area if the Redevelopment Plan may result in the temporary or perma displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in Project Area. The Agency has adopted a method of reloc for the Project Area which incorporates the California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines. H. If any displacement occurs as the result of implementat of the Redevelopment Plan, there are, or shall be provi in the Project Area or in other areas not generally les desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who may be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sani dwellings equal in number to the number of, and availab to, such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 6 — the es of Baer .tion ions .s lent gay 1 be .A the ent ency lies ent he tion on I. Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to Sections 3341 and 33411.1 of the Community Redevelopment Law. Dwelling u its housing persons and families of low or moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5 of the Community Redevelopment Law. The Agency has adopted a method of relocation for the Project Area which incorporates the California Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines. The method provi es that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housiilg unit available and ready for occupancy by such displace person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Section 533 of the Redevelopment Plan provides that whenever dwelling units housing persons a d families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of a redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four YeZLrS of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop o construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed or .constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income, an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing costs.within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency. 75 percent of the replacement dwelling units shall replace dwelling units available at affordable housing cost in the same income level of very low income households, lower income households, and person's and families of low and moderat income, as the persons displaced from those units destr yed. J. There are no noncontiguous areas of the Project Area. K. Inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improvements whicl are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfarE is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the area o which they are a part; any such area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law without other substantial justification for its inclusion. Any such lands, buildings or improvements are an integral part of the Project Area and their proximity to substandard lands, buildings or improvements requires their inclusion within the Project Area to ensure proper and comprehensive planning and redevelopment. Since conditions of blight are prevalent throughout the Project Area, it is not feasible to exclude the lands, buildings, or improvements which are not detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. L. The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not be reasonably expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 — 7 — aid and assistance of the Agency. Substantial public improvements must be constructed to assist in the elimination of the conditions of blight in the Project ; The extent of the required public improvements cannot bi accomplished by private enterprise acting alone. The detrimental conditions of inadequate infrastructure gre impede the Project Area's proper utilization and its ab: to develop and address conditions of blight. Further, 1 combined effects of the conditions of blight in the Pro - Area, such as the deficient buildings, inadequate infrastructure and the negative, non -motivational invest environment and lack of economic motivation caused by excessive costs, all contribute to the conclusion that conditions of blight will not be eliminated in the Proj( Area by private enterprise acting alone. The cost of rehabilitation is prohibitive, especially when property values are falling. The existence of irregularly shape( inadequately sized parcels in multiple ownership discoui private investment because new development cannot meet current zoning, building and design standards and reparcelization of land by the Agency may be necessary. addition, incompatible land uses within the Project Ares cannot be eliminated without the aid and assistance of t Agency. M_ The Project Area is predominately urbanized, as defined subdivision (b) of Section 33320.1 of the Community Redevelopment Law. Of the approximately 1,300 acres in Project Area, approximately 1,225 acres are developed f urban uses or are an integral part of one or more areas developed for urban uses which are surrounded or substantially surrounded by parcels which have been or developed for urban uses. Within the Project Area they, approximately 75 acres of vacant, nonurbanized land, or percent of the total area in the Project Area. Thereto, 94 percent of the Project Area is predominantly urbaniz N. The time limitations that are contained in the Redevelo] Plan are reasonably related to the proposed projects to implemented in the Project Area and to the ability of t] Agency to eliminate blight in the Project Area. The tot estimated cost of the public projects, programs and improvements needed to redevelop the Project Area is approximately $181 million. It is estimated that over 1 life of the Redevelopment Plan, approximately $405 mill: in tax increment revenues will be generated from the Pr( Area and up to $183 million will be available after pay: statutory pass-through amounts and depositing 20 percent the tax increment into the Low and Moderate Income Hous: Fund. In the event that bonds are issued, up to $174 million of tax increment will remain after paying debt service on approximately $47 million of bond principal. This amount could be available to pay for Agency project and may provide a hedge against likely cost inflation. 970327 10572-00001 ows 1600109 — 8 — fitly .lity :he ect ment !ct I and 'ages In he by the r re are six e, d. ment be e al he on ject ng of Therefore, the total cumulative revenues available for projects is estimated to be approximately $183 million. 30 -year duration of the Redevelopment Plan, the 20 -year limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness, and the 45 -year limit on the repayment of indebtedness are necessary in order to assure sufficien time to generate adequate tax increment revenues from t Project Area to implement the redevelopment activities to repay debt, including bonded debt. The C+J O. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area may be displaced and that, pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to such occupants who may be displaced adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to tho e in the City of Diamond Bar at the time of their displacemeilt. SECTION 5. The Redevelopment Plan is hereby appro ed and adopted and is hereby designated as the official redevelopment plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area of the Diamond -Bar Redevelopment Agency. SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized an directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council and shall cause it to be published as required by la . SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The Cit Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordin� and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sectic subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invali unconstitutional. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1997. CITY CLERK 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600104 - 9 - _ day of MAYOR be e - , d or I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Ba held on the 1st day of July, 1997 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Ba held on the 15th day of July, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ansari, Werner, MPT/Herrer and M/Huff NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Harmony ABSTAINED:COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar as duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting eld on the day of 1.997,by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, California 970527 10572-00001 ows 1600109 - 10 - ty of Diamond] Bar DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA PLAN AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pomona Unified School District Walnut Valley Unified School District - Clayton A. Chaput—w� ck''�DWPQ Pomona Unified School District 800 South Garey Avenue Pomona, California 91766 (909) 397-4800, x3888, FAX (909) 397-5050 County of Los Angeles Mishal Montgomery - County of Los Angeles 1199 South Fairway Drive, Suite 111 Rowland Heights, California Mail: P.O. Box 744 . Walnut, California 91788-0744 (909) 594-6561, FAX (909) 594-1621 Chamber of Commerce Arthur R. O'Daly —e-5 California Realty 1200 South Diamond Bar Boulevard, 4101 Diamond Bar, California 91765 (909) 861-9835, FAX (909) 861-0586 P F F Bank & Trust Gilbert F. Smith - `IfC' Senior Vice President / General Counsel P F F Bank & Trust 350 South Garey Avenue P. O. Box 1520 Pomona, California 91769 (909) 623-2323, FAX (909) 620-0296 '{ /Vern Medeiros — b(A 6�` �= Walnut Valley Unified School Distri 880. South Lemon Avenue Diamond Bar, California 91789 (909) 595-1261, FAX (909) 595-421 Caltrans Ron Kosinski -1 ° � - Chief Environmental PIanner Caltrans 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 897-0703, FAX (213) 897-0685 Residence: 21033 Quail Run Drive Diamond Bar, California 9 1789 D'Antoni/RilstorTony DSadie D' 808 NoA Diamond Bar Boulevard Diam nd Bar, California 91765 (90;460-3663, FAX (909) 860-8051 1/29/97 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, Cit anager FROM: Amanda Susskind and Robin Harris, Agency Counsel DATE: July 15, 1997 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUBMISS ON TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF AN ADVISO Y MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA BACKGROUND: At its meeting of July 1, 1997, the City Council introduced n ordinance approving the redevelopment plan (the "Redevelopme t Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area"). The City Council also directed staff to research and prepare the necessary documentation to subject the Redevelopment Plan to a vote of the electors. Our research reveals that a redevelopment plan cannot be adopted or repealed by initiative. However, the City Council may hold an advisory election. Elections Code Section 9603 provides that the City Council can submit an advisory measure to the electorate at a regular election or a special election called for that purpose. Thi procedure could be applied to redevelopment. Therefore, the City Council could place on the ballot an advisory measure on the Redevelopment Plan. While the vote on such a measure would rot be binding, the City Council could make a determination not to go against the wishes of the voters expressed at such an electi n. An advisory election would have no effect'on the base year f r the Project Area. In order to meet the County of Los Angeles deadlines to plat an advisory measure on the November 4, 1997 ballot, the City Co ncil must adopt the attached Resolution at its July 15, 1997 meet'nq. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption. of I the attached Resolution. 970707 10572-00024 rdh. 1672927 0 RESOLUTION NO, 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMO D BAR, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF AN ADVISORY MEASURE RELATING TO THE ADOPTED PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC NO REVITALIZATION AREA IN THE CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIP L ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1997, AS CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 97-46. WHEREAS, A General Municipal election on Tuesday, November 4, 1997 f r the purpose of electing candidates has been called by Resolution No. 97-46, adopted n June 17, 1997; and WHEREAS, the City Council also desires to submit to the voters at the el an advisory question relating to use of redevelopment in the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order submitted to the voters at the General Municipal Election the following advis question pursuant to Elections Code Section 9603: DO YOU FAVOR THE ADOPTED YES PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA? NO SECTION 2. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the elect shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. SECTION 3. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or addit notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoptionot� this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON MAYOR 1, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regu meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1997, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Diai Bar, California, on November 4, 1997, at which there will be submitted to the voter following measure: DO YOU FAVOR THE ADOPTED PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA? NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND C FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes in Favor in Favor Against Against the ND AS members of that body, to file a written argument regarding the City measure as specified above in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the Sqate of California and to change the argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. SECTION 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office o the City Attorney are affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation o the measure. If the measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The impartial analysis hail be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoI tion of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of I , 1997, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: CAWpWVesoluMarguments.res City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.6 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 9, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diam Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides Washington Street from Brea Canyon. Road to South Alder Lane". SUMMARY: In order to mitigate noise that is created by parked semi -trucks with refrigeration on Washington Street, the Traffic and Transportation Commission and staff recommend the par prohibition of commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides c Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lane. All residents on Washington have been notified of this matter and have been invited to attend tonight's City Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar restricting commercial vehicles over tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road South Alder Lane". LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: x Staff Report x Resolution(s) Ordinance(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office) x Other: 5/8/97 T/T Rpt. & Minu 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been x Yes —No reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? Majority — Yes — No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes —No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? x Yes —No Which Commission? Traffic & Transportation 5. Are other departments affected by the report? N/A Yes —No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belg r James DeStefano avid iGLiu City Manager Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council o the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Street frm Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lane" ISSUE STATEMENT: To restrict commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lane. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 97 -XX entitled: "A Resolution of the City Co cil of the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) firm parking on both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon. Road to South Alder Lane" FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The proposed recommendation, which requires the installation of approximately ten (10) Commercial Vehicle Parking Over Five Tons" signs, will cost the City of Diamond Bar approximately $500 and will be funded by Marking and Signing Maintenance account. BACKGROUND/DIS CUSSION: On May 8, 1997, the Traffic and Transportation Commission discussed the request to pro it commercial vehicle parking on both sides of Washington ,Street between Brea Canyon Road and Lincoln Avenue. According to the State of California Vehicle Code, commercial vehicle is defines as " a vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property". Furthermore, the Code states that "passenger vehicles which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or pro fit and housecars (a motor vehicle originally designed, or permanently altered, and equipped for human habitation, or to which a camper has been permanently attached) are not commercial vehicles. The request was based on the need to mitigate noise that is created by parked semi -trucks with refrigeration units in the abovementioned area. From residents in the area, semi -trucks are arked beginning late afternoon until the following early morning, Page Two Prohibition of Commercial Vehicle Parking: Washington Street July 15, 1997 while their refrigeration units are operating. Although staff, the Sheriff Department, and T Bar Volunteer Patrol confirmed the presence of semi -trucks once, residents from the area to their presence. The Traffic and Transportation Commission concurred with staff to prohibit commercial v 'cles parking based on Section 10. 16.150 (c) of Division 2, entitled Parking Time Limits. Sectio i 10. 16.150 (c) , entitled Commercial Vehicle Parking Restrictions, states that "no person siv, 11 stop, park or stand any commercial vehicle having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight ral ing of 10,000 pounds or more on any street, or portion thereof, located in a residential district wit the city...". Based on the public's input, the Commission modified the limitation of the restriction on both sides of Washington Street from Lincoln Avenue to South Alder Lane. All residents on Washington Street have been notified of this matter and have been invited attend tonight's City Council meeting. Prepared By: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D BAR PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES OVER FIVE TONS (11), 000 POUNDS) FROM PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF WASHINGTON STREET FROM BREA CANYON ROAD TO SOUTH ALDER LANE A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on May 8, 1997. (ii) At the meeting of May 8, 1997, the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the prohibition of commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 from parking on both.sides of Washington Street from Brea Road to South Alder Lane is appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commiss recommends the prohibition of commercial vehicles over fiveltons (10,000 pounds) from parking on both sides of Washington Sreet from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lane. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS. 1. Said action is pursuant to Section 10.08.010 of Diamond Bar City Code, as heretofore adopted; 2. The City Council hereby finds that the public heal safety, and welfare will be best protected by the prohibits commercial vehicles over five tons (10,000 pounds) from parki both sides of Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to of on sth Alder Lane as herein prescribed; 3. This resolution shall not become effective until th Commercial Vehicles Over Five Tons" signs on both side Washington Street from Brea Canyon Road to South Alder Lan, properly posted and painted by the City; and 4. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the City Engineer to cause said signs installed as herein defined be established. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , "No of are be 1997 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1997 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamon Bar k Traffic & Transportation Minutes of May 8, 1997. The motion was approved with the following Roll Call vo AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Istik, Nice, Morris, VC/Virginkar, Chair/Leonard NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None VI.BUSINESS: L7A.Evaluation of Washington Street East of Brea Road. AA/Aberra presented the staff report. Staff reco that the Traffic and Transportation Commission co with staff to install "No Commercial Vehicle Park signs on Washington street as deemed appropriate staff and forward said recommendation to the City Council. John Rapiajan said there are no parking problems neighborhood. He wanted to know who is objecting the parking and why. Chair/Leonard responded that as a result of citize input, the matter has come before the Commission f discussion. DPW/Wentz explained that a citizen raised a concer about semi tractor -trailer trucks parking in the a and leaving their vehicles running for extended pe of time which caused a significant amount of noise the adjacent residential area. He reiterated that staff is recommending restriction of commercial ve parking only and not residential. Mr. Rapiajan responded to C/Istik that it does not bother him that trucks park on his street but he w not like for it to be a regular occurrence. Raymond Van Dorn said that although residents need street parking, the semi -trucks parked on the stre with motors running all night concern him. He indicated he is also concerned with sight safety because of the parked trucks. He recommended that Commission place a weight limit restriction on the parking so that it does not penalize the residents prevent them from parking their cars, pickups and campers. He said the person who filed the complai with the City is concerned about the refrigerator trucks parking in front of his home and leaving th units run all night which generates a significant amount of noise and inteferes with the quality of in the area. his iods to icle t fe Traffic & Transportation CDRAFT 'ssion Minutes of May 8,_1997. Eric Flodine said he passes Washington Street at 1 three times a day. He can verify that trucks park the street and leave their motors or refrigeration units running all night. He indicated he feels th, elimination of semi -truck parking needs to extend full length of Washington Street. In addition to semi --trucks, there are usually three rental trucks parked on Washington Street which is very aestheti+ displeasing. He agrees that there is a need for residential street parking. He suggested that the Commission restrict commercial parking for the ful. length of Washington Street. Craig Clute stated the City has granted relief to residents in other parts of the City. He favors granting this request for Washington Street area residents. He is concerned with the placing signs restrict "commercial" vehicles. He said he agreed business vehicles such as rental trucks should be prohibited from street parking. He indicated he fi restricting vehicles of 3 ton gross weight and over DPW/Wentz in response to C/Nice, explained that restricting vehicles 3 ton and over would include larger utility vehicles and recreational vehicles. Therefore, staff is recommending that commercial vehicles be restricted from parking on the street. Following discussion, C/Morris moved, C/Intik seco to approve staff's recommendation to install "No Commercial Vehicle Parking" signs the entire lengt Washington Street to Alder Street as deemed approp by staff and forward said recommendation to the Ci Council. The restriction applies to the rental ag trucks. The motion was approved with the followin Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ast on that that of iate Morris, Istik, hice, VC/Virginkar, Chair/Leonard None None DPW/Wentz indicated this item will appear on the J 3, 1997 City Council agenda for further considerat VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None VIII.ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: DPW/Wentz confirmed that the City's Code Enforcement Department deals with disabled vehicles on private and public property. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 2, 1997 TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: May 8, 1997 Chair and Members of the Traffic and Transportation Commidsion George A. Wentz, City Engineer David G. Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works Tseday Aberra, Administrative Assistant Request to restrict truck parking on Washington Street betwen Brea Canyon Road and Lincoln Avenue BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: The Department of Public Works received a request from a resident to 3-estrict parking on the south side of Washington Street at Lincoln Avenue. The request is based upon the need to mitigate noise that is created by a parked semi - truck a with refrigeration unit. According to the resident, said semi -truck is parked on Washington Street beginning late afternoon until the following early morning, while its refrigeration unit is operating. This sei-truck utilize Washington Street for parking. Over a period of three months, the Department of Public Works, Walnut Sheriff Department, and Diamond Bar Volunteer Patrol Services monitored Washington Street between Brea Canyon Road and Lincoln Avenue and found no parked semi - trucks except on one instance. However, the resident who brought this matter to the Commission's attention relates to the City the presence of semi -truck on numerous instances. Should the Traffic and Transportation Commission consider restricting on Washington Street, staff recommends that the Commission consider of Diamond Bar's Municipal Code Division 2, entitled Parking Time Under Section 10.16.150 (c) entitled Commercial Vehicle Parking Restr Generally, "No person shall stop, park or stand any commercial vehicl a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or mor street, or portion thereof, located in a residential district wii city...". Staff also recommends the Commission consider Section 1 which prohibits parking of any commercial vehicle weighing more th pounds between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (see attachmen After the Traffic and Transportation Commission discusses and recei from the resident, the matter will be forwarded to the City Council determination. parking he City Limits. ctions- :having on nay hin the .16.160 n 6,000 s input r final Page Two Washington Street May 2, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic and Transportation Commission concur with staff to install "No Commercial Vehicle Parking" signs on Washington Street as deemed appropriate by staff and forward said recommendation to the City Co ncil. § 10.16.110 DIAMOND BAR CODE T DIVISION 2. PARKING TIME LIMITS Sec. 10.16.110. Signs limiting parking time authorized in certain circumstances. Whenever the city council finds that on any portion of the highway or of a private Sti eet or of any parking lot maintained or operated, for the public by the city there is at any time 1 ick of sufficient space to accommodate the drivers of vehicles and that the time of parking shc uld be limited so that everyone may have his fair turn, the city engineer shall erect and maint ain adequate signs along such portion of the highway specifying the limitation on the titre of parking. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.64.010), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.16.120. Commercial loading zones. A driver shall not stop for any purpose other than loading or unloading between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., on any day except Sunday, or at such time as the city council riay designate, in any place marked by the city engineer, as provided in this section. Such stop sliall not exceed three minutes for a passenger vehicle and shall n6 -.'exceed 20 minutes for a commercial vehicle in any loading zone so marked by the city engineer in accordance with he Vehicle Code. The city engineer shall so place signs or curb markings if the city council fi ds traffic conditions are such to make loading feasible. Unless otherwise specified by the city council; such loading zone shall not exceed 30 feet in length. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.64.020), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.16.130. Post office parking restrictions. The driver of a vehicle shall not park such vehicle for a longer time than ten minL tes between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. for a distance of 40 feet adjacent to any post of ice when there shall be in place appropriatemarkings or signs so placed by authority of the eity engineer in accordance with this title. {Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.64.030), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.16.140. Depositing mail; restrictions. A driver shall not stop or park for any purpose other than a stop not to exceed a perio I of time reasonably necessary for the deposit of mail in an adjacent mailbox at those Iocati ns marked by the city engineer pursuant to provisions of the Vehicle Code. (Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.64.040), 6-27-89) ec. 10.16.150. Commercial vehicle par rig restric ions— eenerally. (a) The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have he meanings ascribed to them in this subsection, except where the context clearly indicate a different meaning: CD 10:24 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC § 10.16.170 Commercial vehicle means any vehicle which fits the definition of commercial vehicles set forth in Vehicle Code § 260, as amended from time to time, or any successor provision thereof. ,Semitrailer means any vehicle which fits the definition of semitrailer set forth in Vehicle Code § 5550, as amended from time to time, or any successor provision thereof. Trailer means any vehicle which fits the definition of trailer set forth in Vehicle Code § 630, as amended from time to time, or any successor provision thereof. (b) No person shall stop, park or stand any commercial vehicle for more than one-half hour on any street located within the city in a commercial or industrial zone, except while loading or unloading property, for such time in addition to such one -half-hour period as is necessary to complete such work, or when such vehicle is parked in connection with and in aid of the performance of a service to or on property in the block in which such vehicle is parked for such time in addition to such one -half-hour period as is reasonably necessary to complete such service. (c) o person shall stop, pstand any commercial vehicle having a manufacturer's gro ehicle weight rating of 1 ,O�9younds or more on any street, or portion thereof, located in a residential district within the city, except for such time as is re-s,nably necessary to make pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, or merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the street or for such time as is reasonably necessary for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon the street for which a building permit has previously been obtained from the city. (d) No person shall stop, park or stand any trailer or semitrailer on any street, highv or alley located within the city unless such trailer or semitrailer is then attached to a me vehicle capable of drawing or carrying it upon the public streets and highways. (e) The prohibitions contained in this section shall not apply to areas designated resolution of the city council. (Ord. No. 4(1990), §§ 1, 2, 4-3-90) Sec. 10.16.160. Same—Between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Whenever the city council finds that the parking of commercial vehicles on certain pub' streets or alleys is creating a public nuisance or safety hazard, the city engineer shall erect a: maintain adequate signs along such public streets- alleys specifying that a person shall r park any commercial vehicle weighing more than 000 pounds unladen between the hours 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. {Ord. No. 14(1989), § 2(15.64.655), 6-27-89) Sec. 10.16.170. Provisions applicable to state highways. The provisions of this division apply to state highways, except that a sign or marking s not be effective unless and until the finding of the city council b; approved by the s CD10:25 r CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: July 15, 1997 REPORT DATE: July 8, 19 7 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Ranch Festival Request for Use of Peterson Park SUMMARY: The organizers of the Ranch Festival have submitted a request to the City of Diamor d Bar seeking the use of Peterson Park as the location for the 1997 Ranch Festival. Planned dates and times of the festival are as follows: Proposed Dates: Saturday and Sunday, October 4 and 5, 1997 Time: Saturday: Entertainment until 11:00 pm; close at 12:00 midnight continued on Page 2 Sunday: Start shutting'down at about 7:00 pm; close at 9:00 pm RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Coun it not permit the Ranch Festival to use Peterson Park for the 1997 event. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report , Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's c _ Ordinance(s) X Other: Draft minutes of June 12 and Jui Agreement(s) 26, 1997 Parks and Recreation Commission meetings; Correspondance received stating objections to the Ranch Festival's Request; Public Meeting Notice for June 26 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting; Proposed Event Site Plan, EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Ranch Festival Organizers SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? Yes X No 2. Does the report require a majority vote? X Yes — No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No What Commission? Parks and Recreation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: None REVIEWED BY: f Terrence L. Bel g r 4es DeStefano Bob Rose City Manager Deputy City Mana er Community Services Dire City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Page 2 SUMMARY: continued Set-up Dates: Wednesday through Friday, October 1 through 3, 1997 Take Down Date: Monday, October 6, 1997 The Parks and Recreation Commission considered this request at its June 12 and June 26, 1997 me The Commission voted 3-0 (two Commissioners were absent) to recommend that the City Council not the Ranch Festival to use Peterson Park for the 1997 event, due to a concern for the possible negative the event could have on the park. CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: July 16, 1997 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Issue Statement: The organizers of the Ranch Festival have submitted a request to the City of Diamond Bar seeking the ise of .Peterson Park as the location for the 1997 Ranch Festival. Planned dates and times of the festival re as follows: Proposed Dates: Saturday and Sunday, October 4 and 5, 1997 Time: Saturday: Entertainment until 11:00 pm; close at 12:00 midnight Sunday: Start shutting down at about 7:00 pm; close at 9:00 pm Set-up Dates: Wednesday through Friday, October 1 through 3, 1997 Take Down Date: Monday, October 6, 1997 The Parks and Recreation Commission considered this request at its June 12 and 26, 1997 meeting . The Commission voted 3-0 (two Commissioners absent) to recommend that the City Council not permit the Ranch Festival to use Peterson Park for the 1997 event, due to a concern for the possible negative impact the 3vent could have on the park. Shall the City Council affirm the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission to deny th use of Peterson Park for the 1997 Ranch Festival Event? Recommendation: The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council not permit the Ranch Festival t use Peterson Park for the 1997 event. Financial Summary: Staff believes that Ranch Festival organizers will be requesting services from the City that cost between $ ,000 to $10,000 in order to conduct this event. This includes sheriffs deputies, shuttle buses, traffic control de fices and building & safety personnel support. Staff believes that these services will be requested whether the event is conducted at Peterson Park or at the Gateway Corporate Center and that the costs for either locatia i will be similar. Background: The request for the use of Peterson Park by the Ranch Festival organizers was presented to the Parks and City Council Report Community Services Dept. Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Page 2 Background: continued Recreation Commission User Group Subcommittee at its meeting on June 11, 1997. Diamond Bar based youth sports organizations that are affected by the request from the Ranch Festival include AYSO soccer, DiE mond Bar Girls Softball, and FC International club soccer. Each of these groups have been allocated the ise. of Peterson Park for games and/or practices during the Fall season and each would lose the use of Peterso Park during the time that the Ranch Festival is on-site. Each of the organizations listed above had a represe tative present at the User Group meeting and none of them expressed a concern about losing the use of Pe erson Park during the time when the Ranch Festival would be set-up, conducted and taken down (A period of about one week). Therefore, the time at Peterson Park has been allocated to the Ranch Festival, pending ap )roval of the event itself. The matter was then presented to the entire Parks and Recreation Commission at their meeting on J ui ie 12, 1997. Several issues were discussed at this meeting, including traffic and parking, impacts on the local neighborhood, costs to be borne by the city and impacts on the park. The Ranch Festival organizers prcvided the following information at this meeting: 1. The Ranch Festival organizers stated that the sheriffs department supports their plan to close off one lane of traffic in each direction on Golden Springs Drive to allow for diagonal parking, end to shuttle participants to and from outlying parking lots, such as the K -mart shopping center, to s 3tisfy the parking needs of the event. Organizers believe that these measures will also result in a reduction of vehicular traffic in the vicinity of Peterson Park, thus limiting the impact that thevent will have on the neighborhood. 2. Noise impacts on the neighborhood will be reduced, according to organizers, by orientin the entertainment stage and speakers toward the freeway and away from the neighborhood. 3. The Ranch Festival organizer; stated that costs to be bome by the City should be about the as last year, between $8,000 and $10,000. This will provide for sheriffs costs, shuttle buses, control devices, and support from Building & Safety contract staff. 4. With regard to impacts on the park, organizers stated that they would leave the park in the condition that they find it at the start of their use. 5. Ranch Festival organizers stated that they are willing to consider any conditions that City or staff may present. After deliberations at the Commission's June 12 meeting (draft minutes attached), the Commissioners ag eed that they would prefer to haveNadditional input from the residents of the neighborhood that is in the vicini y of Peterson Park before making a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission requested for stE ff to City Council Report Community Services Dept. Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Page 3 Sackgroundmontinued send out a mailer to the residents whose homes are within a 114 mile radius of Peterson Park. The noti e (sample attached) included information about the facility request received from the Ranch Festiv 1 and instructions on how to provide comments about the request. Of a total mailing of 406 notices, 11 letters and 4 phone calls were received from residents who reside in the immediate neighborhood near Peterson Park. None of the correspondence received was in favor of the I tanch Festival being conducted at Peterson Park. Concerns expressed include: 1. Too much traffic 2. Too much noise 3. Not enough parking 4. Too much trash 5. Concern for safety with so many people coming into the neighborhood for such a large eve it. 6. Peterson Park is too small for this type of event. 7. Emergency vehicles will be delayed accessing the neighborhood due to all the traffic. Copies of the correspondence received are attached to this report. The Parks and Recreation Commission met on June 26, 1997 (draft minutes attached) to again consid r the request from the Ranch Festival to conduct the 1997 event at Peterson Park. There were five peor le in attendance at this meeting that supported the request from the Ranch Festival. Their identities are stat d on the attached Parks and Recreation Commission forms. None of those in support of the Ranch Festival re uest live in the immediate neighborhood near Peterson Park. In response to the concerns expressed by the residents from the neighborhood near Peterson Park, Festival organizers presented the following information: 1. Traffic - Seargent Dave Rash, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department/Walnut Station, si ited that the proposed event is scaled-down from what has been conducted at the Gateway Corp rate Center. The scaled -dawn event will result in less traffic. He stated that traffic on Golden Sp Ings Drive is actually disrupted more when conducted at the Gateway Coporate Center, then it w II be if conducted at Peterson Park. 2. Noise - Noise impacts on the neighborhood will be reduced, according to organizers, by orier the entertainment stage and speakers toward the freeway and away from the neighborhood. 3. Parking - Seargent Rash stated that 675 cars can be parallel parked on Golden Springs Temple Avenue and Diamond Bar Blvd, assumming the City waives the "No Parking" re City Council Report Community Services Dept. Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Page 4 Backg round: continued along Golden Springs. Also, shuttling participants to and from outlying parking lots, such Kmart shopping center, to satisfy the parking needs of the event will further reduce the impa the event will have on the neighborhood. the that 4. Trash - Ranch Festival organizers stated that youth volunteers pick-up the trash in the area (Of the event. 5. Safety- Seargent Rash stated that 160 deputy assignments will be allocated to the Ranch R for traffic control and security measures. He also stated that with no Friday night activity, will be a limited influx of junvenlles from neighboring and outlying communities. 6. Concerns About Peterson Park - With regard to impacts on the park, organizers stated tha with a scaled-down event, it will fit nicely into Peterson Park. They also stated that they will leave the park in the same condition that they find it at the start of their use. Ranch Festival organizer, also stated that they are willing to consider any conditions that the City Council or staff may present in order to conduct the event at Peterson Park. Emergency Vehicle Access - Seargent Rash stated that emergency vehicles will uninterupted access to the neighborhood during the event. The major concern expressed by the Commission was for the effect that large heavy trucks, describe as - weighing between 40,000 and 50,000 pounds, would have on the sidewalks, athletic playing fields an the sprinkler system. The City is in the process of constructing an ADA retro -fit project at the park, and the project includes a perimeter walkway. The project is not scheduled to be completed until the week prior to the Rinch Festival (Note: the plant establishment period will continue until 30 days after the Ranch Festival). In ord r to access the area proposed for the carnival rides, these large trucks will have to cross the perimeter wall, ay (see proposed plan attached). The walkways are designed to accommodate a City parks maintenance vet 'cle, which is a pick-up truck that weighs between 3,000 and 4,000 pounds. The Commission is concerned a out the large trucks breaking these new walkways. The carnival is proposed to be set-up in the grass area of field #1 (closest to Golden Springs Drive). Thisl ea serves as the outfield for the softball field and as a soccer game and practice field. Use of this field has airdy been allocated to Diamond Bar based youth sports organizations, and they are scheduled to be on thisld the day after the conclusion of the Ranch Festival. The Commission expressed concern that the heavy trks will damage the athletic field's topography and become a potential hazard for the participants of the yth sports programs. The soil under the grass of the athletic fields is clay material, which is easily compa ted when heavy weight is applied. The fields may need to be aeriated, mulched and overseeded after an ei ent like the Ranch Festival to bring the athletic field back into normal playing condition (Note: This maintena ice City Council Report Community Services Dept. Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Page 5 Background:continued work was all done after the City's Anniversary Celebration this year at Peterson Park). Itis unlikely ruts will be cut into the grass by the trucks, unless there is rain or broken main lines to the irrigation large The concern expressed by the Commission for the irrigation system is for broken heads and underg and water lines. When a large vehicle drives over a sprinkler head, not only can the head be broken, but the N feight of the vehicle pushes down on the sprinkler head and can easily break the lateral sprinkler line conn ed to the head below the ground. Broken heads and lateral lines would not be discovered until after the irrigation system is turned back on after the Ranch Festival concludes its use of the site (the irrigation system ill be turned off the week prior to and during the Ranch Festival to limit the possibility of large ruts in the gras# Ranch Festival organizers have stated that irrigation system damage can be prevented by placing plywood sheets over the sprinkler heads. Ranch Festival organizers have also stated that they will be financially responsible for any damage to Peterson Park caused by the event and are willing to pay a security deposit to guarantee that the funds are available for any necessary repair work. The Parks and Recreation Commission stated that they did not want to risk the potential damage tht the Ranch Festival event may cause to Peterson Park, even though over time, any and all damage cou t be repaired. Citing their concern for the negative impact that the event would most likely have on the park, the Co mmi sion voted 3-0 (two member absent) to recommend to the City Council that the Ranch Festival not be pe m�i d to use Peterson Park for the 1997 event. Because the Parks and Recreation Commission is an advisory body, this issue is before the City Counit for affirmation of the Commission's recommendation. Discussion The Diamond Bar Ranch Festival is a Diamond Bar based, certified non-profit organization. Per the Dark Facility Regulations section I -D (pg 6), this status qualifies the Ranch Festival as a Group B User Group, the second highest priority for use of park facilities, behind only City of Diamond Bar sponsored activities. Per I Dark Facility Regulations section Ill, A-1 (pg 12) and B-1 (pg 13), no fees are to be charged for the use of the Dark or for the lights. However, insurance, security deposits and fees for any damage to the park may be requ red. Section III, E-1 and E -1-a (pg 15) states that: "Diamond Bar based non profit organizations may use City p for commercial activNes/events to raise funds to support community service programs and activities in the of Diamond Bar. Requests must be submitted sixty (60) days in advance of the date of the activity/event will be considered by the City's park reservation personnel with input from the Parks and Recre2 City Council Report Community Services Dept. Ranch Festival Request For Use of Peterson Park Meeting Date: July 15, 1997 Page 6 Discussion. continued Commission." Since 1987, organizers report, the Ranch Festival has been responsible for over $100,000 in donations to the Diamond Bar community. Although Ranch Festival sponsors have been limited during the past few years, there were 12 community based organizations that benefitted financially by their involvement with the Ranch Festival in 1996, according to organizers. These 12 organizations include Diamond Bar High School Band, Dia and Bar High School Roller Hockey, Diamond BarlWalnut YMCA, Diamond Bar Breakfast Lions Club, Rotary Club, Fire Stations 120 and 119, Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), St. Dennis Church Youth Organization, G Iden Springs Elementary School, Diamond Bar High School Key Club and the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Reserves. Organizers also stated that the 1996 event concluded with the Ranch Festival $10,000 in debt. It was further reported that fund raising activities conducted since the 1996 event have reduced the amo nt of indebtedness. There are several Park Facility Regulations and City Ordinances that, unless waived by the City Council, affect the request for the use of Peterson Park as submitted: 1. Public address system and amplified sound may be used only during the hours of 10:00 ary and 9:30 pm daily. Use of the system must comply with the City Noise Ordinance and mu not unreasonably disturb the surrounding residences. (Park Facility Regulations Section IV, -2-a through e; pg 18) 2. Hour limit for use of ball field lights is 10:00 P.M. (Park Facility Regulations Section Ill, 13) 3. The park closes at 10:00 P.M. (City Ordinance Section 12.00.220 -2; pg CD12:9) Prepared by: Bob Rose Community Services Director Ki Proposed Site Plan for Ranch Festival at Peterson Pa r� 46 CNI� (300 I 41, Application Submitted by Ranch Festival. Organizers for the Use of Peterson Park May -30-97 12:09 City 01, Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Community Services Department 21660 F. Copley Drive, Ste 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 396-5699 • Fax (909) 861-311 7 Application For Use of City Facilities Estimated Aetendance or Participants: Adults Taa Admissioryponation or other Chwg*M Wye$ 0 No if yes, amt i e lanationt �� to the Ptitllic - '� of Inswanw, (si,000.ow MfRffAM PA" ❑ aascballDian+ond Q PSCniC Fa6lities ❑ Other o Sona Field Eli ❑ Soccer Field CZ) 0 82selsall Diamond (1) ❑ Baseball Diamond M ❑ Other - Q Lower Matic Afta ❑ Softs jam} ❑ 00W I City Special Event Insurance ❑ Private CenjrKaft FACAME3 DESIRED a F1W Arra 0 PiCniC Faditties ❑ other PICniC Shelilr (1) Q( ri nic Shelter u) Er Sollball Diamond Mn Ir� Softball Diamond (2)0 0� Soccer Field (1) cer Field (Z =o C stamirTMOGLeamZ =+ o 0 UPPlr Pt tic Area ❑ lower PlaniC Area rnm ❑ Softball Diamond c> ❑ othw r+'s P -OZ U No •INSU"Na UQUMMMM The CitY rpuirts a CertikMe of Slmlllion General liallility Insurance nurrins a City of Diamond 8W as additional insunld. Cry ofl�rs Special Event Insurarscr} if a inswwm. pial determined by lmCi1V Cs i3 r ■� is unable to stcurl." necessary CNV,fto s initrrsnce to he I�ecestary fi a: � r°r' CrO�'s o< 50 0► mors irtvol rod in as actldly the �>n#. Is�sl►tdoas eYa+M, ar tarr�nY �ta1. .SKURITY 004M KgU1 St The City requires a refundable Smrity Deposit of 150.00 for events wifi or more plQple in aaendancx Sscurity Deaosi; refunds are processed in aPPresimmoty 3 to a weeim. kss any charges iftc irred. Non4i,ror;t Crpnizations can rtQvesE use of storage rat iliti4s iAdlot restr00nf k -use of (!*Ilir�td I; e.�a;t Park re'ouinh a 5100 de K li is are 44 own, i$100 00 � }t will b# Ch&fM. rich key. May -3x- 97 1.2:09 C i tY of 0 i amari� �a r P.03 AG REEM ENT THE UNDERSIGNED hereby states, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California, that (s)he is the person duly authdrized to make and sign this application, and that (s)he hak read and understands the policies and regulations of the City of Diamond Bar pertaining to the use f City park and recreation facilities, a cops of the remipt of which is hereby acknowledged. FURTHER, THE UNDERSIGN D ACCEPTS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: • To comply with all laws, Kies, rules and regulations of the City of Diamond ON raining to the use of City facilities an to hold the City of Diamond Bar harmless from any liability damage to persons or property whi may arrive by reason of such use. • To promptly, upon recti of notice, reimburse the City of Diamond Har for any expenpes or loss incurred by said City as a ult of non-compliance with any of the approved twins oft is permit. • To promptly, upon receipttof notice, reimburse the City of Diamond Bar far any loss or, pe City Property Caused by u of such property, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Signature • No Alcoholic Beverages , • The City of Diamond Bar • The applicant must assn stalls. • No vehicle(s) will, be alto FEB COLLEET8W Security ,Deposit Light Deposit Key Deposit Special Event insurance TOTAL ]FM icant PARK REGULATIONS � /-g7 Date allowed in City Parks. . ay cancel the use of park facilities due to weatherfcondition that participants utilise public parking area and park only on City Park progeny. Oface Use only REFUNDED FEES : Deposit s Less Adjusted Fees s TOTAL REFUND s� S Rtteived Bya ... � bite: Aveessed BY Da Submitted for Approval: Data: Rofund Istut Dile. to park, nwked Public Meeting Notice for June 26, 1997 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Topic: Ranch Festival Request to Conduct the 1997 Ranch Festival at Peterson Park, 24142 Sylvan Glen Road Date of Meeting: Thursday, June 26, 1997 7:00 P.M. Location of Meeting: A.Q.M.D. Board Hearing Room 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar Hosted by: City of Diamond Bar Parks and Recreation Commission The organizers of the Ranch Festival have requested the use of Peterson P; for the 1997 Ranch Festival, scheduled for Friday and Saturday, October 4 and 5. The Parks and Recreation Commission is conducting this public meeting to obtain input from the neighbors of Peterson Park on this reque; Four Ways for you to provide your input on this request: I. Attend the meeting on Thursday, June 26 at 7:00pm 2. Write a letter to: City of Diamond Bar Community Services Departm€ 21660 E. Copley Dr. # 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 3. Fax a letter to: (909) 861-3117 4. Telephone Community Services staff at: k707)396-3 For additional information or directions, please call (909) 396-5694. Correspondence Received from Residents Living Nea Peterson Park June 29, 1997 City of Diamond Bar Community Services Department 21660 E. Copley Drive #100 Diamond Bar, CA. 91765 Re: 1997 Ranch Festival at Peterson Park. .. "? F1 !�' 3 j4 FA 'J v�ti _ 4 DIAMOND BRJR COn'r-UIN-TY SE YICE5 We are neighbors of Peterson Park and have supported the Ranch Festival in the past. we are opposed to using Peterson Park for the 1997 Ranch Festival. The Ranch Festival will bring considerable traffic congestion, noise, trash and unwanted vi 'tor; to our neighborhood. There are only two ways out of our neighborhood Sylvan Glen Road and High Knob Road neither of which has a traffic signal. The added traffic will increase the probability of traffic accidents and delays in entering and leaving the area. There is inadequ ate parking which means festival attendees will park in front of neighboring homes. This is an inconvenience to us and our visitors. The added foot traffic will bring trash that will end up on neighboring lawns. Although the Festival is scheduled for the weekend, the noise has a dire impact on those living closest to the park. We want to retain our quiet neighborhood! It We have noticed over the years that the Ranch Festival has lost some of its appeal and won4 this is why the change in location is requested. We believe that the Cooperate Center is the appropriate location for the Ranch Festival or perhaps it should be phased out altogether! We would like to know the outcome of your decision. Sincerely, A 'chard and GeraldinViylor� 774 N. Featherwood Drive Diamond Bar, CA. 91765 ler if most JULY 1, 1997 VED 7 �'LL -3 .1c; 0:'5 Bf�!#lOr�:D SAR COt`irIUNIT ERY[CPS RE: RANCH FESTIVAL REQUEST TO USE PETERSON PARK ON OCTOBER 4th AND 5th. AS A HOMEOWNER AT CIMMERON OAKS I AM PROTESTING THE USE OF THE PARK FOR THIS FESTIVAL. SINCE THE PARK HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FOR BALL GAMES AND ETC. THERE HAS BEEN AN ON-GOING PROBLEM WITH PARKING, TRASH, ANIMAL DROPPINGS AND GANG -BANGERS! I AM NOT AGAINST PEOPLE USING THE PARK AND CHILDREN PLAYING BALL OR PLAYING ON THE E UIP- MENT, BUT WHEN THINGS LIKE A "FESTIVAL" IS ADVERTISED, IT UNFORTUNATELY DRAWS ALOT OF UNDESIRABLE PEOPLE THAT IN RUDE ON THE GOOD-NATURED PEOPLE TRYING TO HAVE A GOOD TIME. THESE UNDESIRABLES PARK ON THE GRASS, BLOCK PRIVATE DRIVE- WAYS, THROW TRASH ON THE STREET TAKE OVER THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE AND RESTROOMS. IT'S PRETTY BAD WHEN GOOD FOLKS AND KI)S CAN'T HAVE A GOOD TIME WI'T'HOUT WORRY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. KATHY AND HAROLD KIE 24240 SYLVAN GLEN ROAD DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 MEMORANDUM TO: HEAD OF PARK & RECREATION SERVICES PHONE: 909-396-5694 FAX: 909-861-3117 FROM: Helen Martinez PHONE: 909-8604177 Homeowner above Peterson Park FAX. 909-396-0822 RE: RANCH FESTIVAL AT PETERSON PARK DEAR CFTY OF DWIOND BAR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: You have asked for response regarding have the Ranch Festival at Peterson Park. I vote no!!!!! Rationale: The past Ranch Festivals that have take place over in the Copley area show the amount of people that come. I believe that the last estimate of the year I went was 10,000 people. There is insufficient parking, insufficient street parking, it is a high density area, as the area has several townhouse complexes. Plus there is insufficient area for the carnival that usually accompanies the area. I recommend that you hold it in the area at the end of Grand --on either side. I aft# sure t YOU can negotiate rental of the land. - .mac 4 p i USING PETERSON PARK IS OUT OF THE QUESTION AS IT IS RAY TOO S),f tI 0 IF THE FESITVAL HAS GOTTEN THAT SMALL, I RECOMMEND YOU REIV IE u`',Z:, THE REASON WHY IT HAS GOTTEN THAT SMALL AND REPOSITION THE � � FESTIVAL OR RE-CREATE THE REASON WHY THE PEOPLE DID COME. llr_�G Ln S * 10'3Dud 'bic.L — CITY OR DIAMOND BAR Regarding annual Rauch Festival I will not be able to attend the meeting for the Ranch Festival. I will be minding my RETMEMENT DINNER! My main concern regarding this event, is the parking. The Sylvan Glen and Golden Springs corner is a very hazardous corner with out any events going on. A street traffic light is needed at this corner. During the ball game events pat5dng is terrible - you cannot have a very clear view at tines. I suppose excess traffic could be parked at the two schools. More restroorns will be needed. Sincereleylvan Connie 24104 En ltd. E Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 909-860-3390 r? .mss L --~ s-- Tune 23, 1997 "'=7 tl CITY OR DIAMOND BAR Regarding annual Rauch Festival I will not be able to attend the meeting for the Ranch Festival. I will be minding my RETMEMENT DINNER! My main concern regarding this event, is the parking. The Sylvan Glen and Golden Springs corner is a very hazardous corner with out any events going on. A street traffic light is needed at this corner. During the ball game events pat5dng is terrible - you cannot have a very clear view at tines. I suppose excess traffic could be parked at the two schools. More restroorns will be needed. Sincereleylvan Connie 24104 En ltd. E Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 909-860-3390 June 29, 1997 � r V ED City of Diamond Barco�� pip SA R Community Services Department CES 21660 E. Copley Drive. #100 Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing in regards to a letter I received regarding th( Diamond Bar Ranch Festival scheduled for October 4 and 5 and the suggestion of conducting the festival at Peterson Par] Although having the festival within walking distance from m, home might be interesting. But, the area surrounding Peterson Park is strictly residential and I feel very strong against the idea of the enormous traffic and parking situation this is going to create. Peterson park is not as large an area a opposed to where the Festival is usually held near the City Hall where there is more ground area and also a much larger parking area. As, I have mentioned Peterson Park is not ver) big, and the amount of traffic from the Festival is too much ft a small residential area that surrounds Peterson Park. I would enjoy attending the Festival in the Copley Drive area much more than having to deal with the traffic situation just to get to my home. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at my home number 909-560-5487. 1 ai definitely opposed to having the Festival at Peterson Park. Thank You, Betty Wong Cil 4 S 9 N. Featherwood Dave Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 Euclid Vi nage�x�ent M- ( fompany. .7ur;e :15, 1997 City of Diamond Bar n Commuity Services Department 21660 East Copley Drive #100 Diamonj Bar, California 91765 Ret C.Lmarron Oaks XI Homeowners Association Dear C'.)mmunity Services Staff; P . e I We ar,_ in receipt of your flyer regarding the public meet ng schedu.-ed for Thursday June 26, 1997 to discuss the Ranch Festiv 1, The Beard of Directors have several questions regarding the Praposs.d event. What type of security measures will be in Place? Will EI-curity guards be in place to patroladjacent areas? The homeowners are concerned that unauthorized persons will be enter ng the coriplex. What are the hours of the festival? The sei:ond concern is in regard to parking. The Association has very limited guest parking, many of the residents currently park on Sylvan Glen Road. The streets within the complex are all firela es and a towing company has been contracted. to tow all illegally parked vehicles within the complex. Where will Festival patrons be requirf d to park? s.astly, the Association is concerned with the potential probl with 1:.iter. The Association prides itself on a neat and clE appearance. Will a clean up crew be employed? pl.ease'send us the answers to our questions: in writing as soon possible. If you should have any queztions, please do not hesita to contract our office. Sincer{.iY, xla i;,nue Division Manager for Cimarroh Oaks XI Homeowners Association 1 1425 west Foothill Blvd. Mailing Address: t. E Suite 340 Upland,CA 909/981-a1 11 Box 1510 Upland, CA 91785-1510 C-) c t� roc M v �x 0t M 0 :e (_ I / 1� 1A Afl,A) It TAVA 601 �•E t�� N � Go t i Qu S-� � �o R -r T f. Ca K ,Q 5f Lw I- _CP, UP tLA yr 3 M•n��u��s Vto fUe + U S e icy 9gNu e vv Q Re s u G T A RNA kv L.o`r MR* tJ DQ ps y MeAj CN,,� isGeaJ Cyte-'fv��-_� I, _�k_ �_tj M br�L, SOX P&)kAA�,?jap. hjo *V e auo PAJ u ` y ftj1 A WN \) . C. �. ct h me -f _W 6'1 H t� Cota-ff4 IV6-S CIPU19 W307 V NO ts-C L" --r �f()u P, Yo v LW u L.D EL NU . 0) j86? �3 Jan \AJIAW 144,k-, -Pkf-a If, - s . TRW( C., � GSR 0 Lo [:yo e V -C,79 -z oiz- s P" t ykj&kA,Lj ►t-��,.�G��, tit _V\4"V YOO s 4� . 6-zs- 9r) .0 P09K Ka Message printed by INFO From : ANASECOI.MFRANKEN@EDS.COM To INFO Subj DIAMOND BAR RANCH FESTIVAL FEEDBACK Numb : 38516 of 38530 Date 06/26/97 5:06am Read 06/26/97 9:02am Reference None Conf 99 - Internet Email Gateway[I] Private YES Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:06:28 -0700 From: Maureen Frankeny <anasecOl.mfranken@eds.com> Organization: EDS, Southern California Resource Center To: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us Subject: Diamond Bar Ranch Festival Feedback To Whom It May Concern: I am a resident of North Diamond Bar. I live about a half mile fro Peterson Park. I am opposed to having the Diamond Bar Ranch Festival at Peterson Park. Living near Peterson Park, I know the effects on traffic that just ving the Diamond Bar Birthday Celebration and various softball tournament has had on access to my home. The Diamond Bar Ranch Festival is a much larger event designed to draw the maximum number of people. I do not feel that Peterson Park, wita its limited parking, its proximity to homes, and its limited access is tae appropriate place to hold the festival. Even last weekend, I notice that the Sheriff Department had stationed an officer on Sylvan Glen in an effort to control traffic and traffic speed along that street. The additional traffic will also have to negotiate Diamond Bar Boule ard, which is now under construction. While I noticed a start date on th project, I also noted that no target end date was listed. Please list my vote, and that of my husband, in opposition to the proposal of having the Ranch Festival at Peterson Park. Sincerely, Maureen & Daryl Coressel 838 N. Featherwood Drive Diamond Bar, 91765 nn(' vi viCi 7� �lil i,�3 CSC rib s,t c -v l C" I C Cp G) i n 4 � S 1 SCA 9 'c -f- G Y'r1G.i(� t- C?T' e- C-�t c) �c jj k Y-•S �`+R; �S the. rY�r �c3 CkC-5 �c-� cc.1"n 1 Ca �c r--N � y € G, C0 be c j) (1t G3 C) 0 C E �+ [ -� k C_:) 4p -) 0 Yl C,< L- . i0'd 6£S6�i98-606 sP-ARmP3 Lae4O!-W dOS=LA L-5o-unr FROM : HPML I N' S 0909) 396-4076 PHONE NO. : 909 396. 076 Jun. 25 19 i Q , : 4OPM Pi Jzd Say . & 9765 �c�� � t� 26 ell T- (A � F • dr r s a • 08/08/00 12:44 FAX I z01 V110 tip a 0 � Topic: NZI Ranch Festival Request to Conduct the 1997 Ranch Festival at Peterson Park, 24142 Sylvan Glen Road Date of Meeting: Thursday, June 26, 1997 7:00 P.M. Location of Meeting: . A.Q.M.D. Board Hearing Room 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Sar Hosted by: City of Diamond Bar Parks and Recreation Commission The organizers of the Ranch Festival have requested the use of Peterson for the 1997 Ranch Feil, sch®duled for Friday and Saturday* October and 5. The Parks and Recreation Commission isjcondt ctiinglthi public meeting to obtain input from the neighbors of Peterson Park on this reqs Four Ways for you to provide your input on this request I . Attend the meeting on Thursday, June 26 at 7ppr* 2. Write a fetter to: City of Diamond lla -;Sc Community 5ervices`PO 21660 E. Copley Dr.'f 10,`. Diamond Bar, CA 91765, 3. Fax a fetter to: (909) 861-3.1170 t CIO 4. Telephone Community Services staff at k -A"') 39 51 Fora&idoml informadion ordfimcWbns, please call (909) .393694 6124197 10:24am Paul Gonzalez Cimarron Oaks I am against the idea of the Ranch Fesitval in Peterson Park. The parking is inadequate Not enough parking for an event that size. Keep the event on Copley where it has alw been. 6/25/97 10:26am Resident Cimarron Oaks Not enough parking for that large of an event. The park is very crowded when the ballgames are in progress, I can't imagine how it would be with this size of an event. The intersection of Sylvan Glen & Golden Springs is too congested. I am concerned th emergency vehicles will not have access to our homes or will be delayed. 6126197 4:55p.m. Resident Cimaron Oaks Would not like Festival conducted at Peterson Park. The event would cause too much noise and traffic. The neighborhood streets are too narrow. Not enough parking in pa and overflow would cause a nuisance. Telephone Complaint regarding Ranch Festival: Received 6/30/97 from Mrs. Ortiz She is a ainst the Ranch Festival being conducted at Peterson Park because of traffic Draft Minutes of June 12, 1997 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 2900 S. Brea Canyon Road JUNE 12, 1997 CALL TO ORDER. Chairman Finnerty called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner Tye. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Finnerty, Vice -Chairman O'Connor, Commissioners, Medina and Holder Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ranch Festival Request for Peterson Park. CSD/Rose stated that the City of Diamond Bar has received a request fro organizers of the Ranch Festival seeking use of Peterson Park as the locatic the 1997 Ranch Festival. The event is proposed to be held on Saturda, Sunday, October 4 and 5, 1997. Setup and takedown would extend L Peterson Park from Wednesday, October 1, to Monday, October 6. indicated the event application was reviewed on Wednesday, June 11, at the User Group meeting. The facility users indicated no negative impZ their programs from the event. No one at the User Group meeting spc opposition to the request from the Ranch Festival. Cathy Johnson, representative of the Ranch Festival, stated that the F Festival has been a non-profit event that has been conducted in Diamon for approximately 15 years. The Ranch Festival purpose is to prov Tye, i the n for and ;e of He 997 .t on ce in Bar ea JUNE 121F 1997 �, P-A PAGE 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMINSION communitywide activity which gives organizations an opportunity t raise funds. The proceeds go back into the community. Mrs. Johnson said that the past two years have been difficult for the Ranch Festival. The Gateway Corporate Center location requires a great deal of effort and dollars for site preparation. In addition, major sponsors have pulled their funding. She indicated that members of the community and the City Council have expressed an interest in pursuing a joint venture between the Ranch Festival and the City's Anniversary Celebration. In the meanti the committee is considering a scaled down two day event. She also pres nted a site plan of the proposed facility setup. Mrs. Johnson indicated she spoke with Mike Roberts, Walnut Sheriff's Department in charge of traffic for Diamond Bar, who, according to Mrs. Johnson, stated he had no problem with Ranch Festival traffic circula ion at Peterson Park. She suggested that traffic on Golden Springs Road be nar owed to one lane each way with the outside lanes dedicated to parking in th park vicinity. In addition, she proposed shuttle service from each of t e two elementary schools in the area. Mrs. Johnson continued stating it would be the Festival's intention to leave the park property in the condition it was presented to them. The Park would be fenced on all four sides. Admission is charged. She recommended using portable toilets in lieu of the Park's restroom facilities. She listed the foll Dwing organizations that benefited from the 1996 Ranch Festival: Diamond Ba High School Band, Diamond Bar High School Roller Hockey, Diamond Bar alnut YMCA, Diamond Bar Breakfast Lions, Rotary Club, Fire Stations 120 and 119, VFW, St. Denis Youth Organization, Golden Springs School, Diamo d Bar High Key Club and Sheriff's Reserves. Chair/Finnerty asked what will the event cost. Mrs. Johnson and Mr. Johnson responded that the cost is approximately $50,000. The intention of the Festival is to break even. In 1996, the Festival lost $10,000. Overall, the Festival has given $100,000 to the community since 1987. Chair/Finnerty asked how much money the participating organizations rdalize. JUNE 1211997 P PAGE 3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Steve Johnson responded that the Festival does not solicit feed back from the participants on their revenues earned. Chair/Finnerty asked how many organizations have not returned to parti spate in subsequent Festivals. Mr. Johnson indicated the Festival does not maintain that type of data. Mrs. Johnson said she is not aware of any non profit organization that would not want to return. CITye asked why the Festival does not continue to use the Gateway Corporate Center. Mrs. Johnson responded that the Gateway Corporate Center has a more commercial feeling. In addition, it takes a considerable amount of prepaation and cost ($3,000 to $4,000) to plant the grass and maintain it. Mr. Johnson said that a $5,000 figure is more realistic for the preparation bf the lot. II CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that the irrigation and drainage wDrk at Peterson Park will most likely be completed after Pantera Park opens (pring of 1998) so that the City does not lose playing fields. The ADA Retrof t will commence when the Girls Softball tournament is completed the end of June. The work is scheduled to be completed within the 90 day contract period The contractor would be notified in advance of the Ranch Festival and work ould halt during the event. Mrs. Johnson responded to Chair/Finnerty that the site plan is tentativ and subject to input from staff, the Sheriff's Department, the City's Buildin and Safety Department, and the fire department. Chair/Finnerty asked if the adjacent condominium owners have been about the use of Peterson Park. Mr. Johnson responded that the adjacent residents would not be con unless the City approves the new location. C/Tye indicated he has a concern about charging the public for use of a public JUNE 12, 1997 PAGE 4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION park facility and asked how the Ranch Festival would handle charging eople access to a public park facility. Mr. Johnson responded that when the Ranch Festival was held at Sylvan Glen Park in 1987, the park was fenced off and admission was charged. The 1997 event would be handled in the same manner as per the Temporary Use Permit issued by the City. Mr. Johnson responded to C/Tye that Peterson Park would not be avails le for public use during the weekend of the event. CSD/Rose indicated to C/Medina that the City included this event in its calendar from Wednesday, October 1, 1997 through Monday, October 6, 1997. The user groups indicated they would be willing to practice at other facilities and that they could hold away games during this period. ClMedina suggested straw be placed on the turf to avoid damage. Mr. Johnson responded that the Festival did not consider using straw thi� year because it burns the grass. Mr. Johnson responded to Chair/Finnerty that the Festival is proposing tangle parking on Golden Springs Road. Chair/Finnerty explained that the City Anniversary Celebration Committee did not pursue angle parking on Golden Springs Drive because of a conce n for safety. CSD/Rose explained that on-site parking at Peterson Park for the City Anniversary Celebration was allowed on field #1 which accommo ated parking in the outfield area. Mrs. Johnson indicated it is the Festival's intent to limit parking on grassy areas to VIP's and workers. The only parking proposed for the right of way is senior parking. She stated she believes most vehicles will park away from the site and utilize the shuttles as they have in past years. Chair/Finnerty reiterated her concern that the condo residents adjacentthe park be contacted prior to considering the park as the site of the event. JUNE 12, 1997 PAGE 5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMI4SION Mr. Johnson responded to Chair/Finnerty that the condominium owners association is not aware that the Ranch Festival Committee has req ested tonight's meeting for the purpose of seeking a permit to hold the event. Mr. Johnson responded to C -/Holder that the admission fee basically Covers Festival overhead expenses. The Festival gives away a certain amount f free tickets. One year the Sheriff's Department handed out free admission tickets for good driving. Each school's administration is given a block of tickets to be disbursed as they deem fit. VC/O'Connor asked CSD/Rose how the placement of booths on the brick dust areas of the ballfields would effect the ballfield diamonds and how will the community react to booths in this area. CSD/Rose responded that booths and foot traffic will not damage the brick dust. VC/O'Connor stated that she is aware, through her work on the City Anniversary Celebration Committee, that two schools decided to ease participation in the Ranch Festival due to the increased cost and the la k of return on investment. VC/O'Connor said she has a difficult time believing the Festival can handle the traffic. She explained the parking setup for the Anniversary Celebration. She stated she does not believe the Festival will be able to mitigate the Golden Springs Road traffic. She likes the idea of no parking on Sylvan Glen Road because of the impact to the residents. She agrees with Chair/Finner and C/Holder that she is not ready to make a decision prior to notification f the condominium residents. C/Medina moved that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Ranch Festival's request for use of Peterson Park subject to notification of the residents adjacent to Peterson Park on Sylvan Glen Road. The motion died for lack of a second. C/Tye asked if the committee had considered a location more suitable t the scope of the Festival. He suggested consideration of the Calvary ChapelI t on Golden Springs Road at Grand Avenue. Mr. Johnson said Site D would be very appropriate if it was graded into a JUNE 12, 1997 PAGE 6 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION site. CJMedina suggested the Pantera Park location. CSD/Rose stated Pantera Park construction is scheduled to commence �uly 1, 1997 and continue through the Spring of 1998. C/Tye reiterated that he does not believe Peterson Park is the proper facility to accommodate an event of the Festival's size with the close proximity o the residences. Although security can be provided for the Festival site, security cannot be assured for the surrounding residents. Mrs. Johnson stated her understanding about the Commission's areas of concern which are the residents and traffic control. She offered to noti the condominium owners and the Sheriff's Department. She asked if the Commission would accept a consensus from these two entities and approve the Festival and work with the committee. Chair/Finnerty reiterated her major concern for the impact on the park sit the City's investment. Mrs. Johnson reiterated the committee's intent to return the fields to original condition. VC/O'Connor asked how much the City would be spending on the Festival. and their CSD/Rose responded that approximately $8,000 to $10,000 would bespe t by the City in the form of in-kind support such as shuttle service, Sheriff's dep ties and traffic control devices. VC/O'Connor asked if the City provides support for any other organization's activities. CSD/Rose responded the City supports programs such as those conducteby Diamond Bar based youth sports organizations by providing free use of fields and lights. CSD/Rose responded to C/Medina that he is not aware of any Birds Eye D residents complaining about the Ranch Festival when conducted at the JUNE 12, 1997 PAGE 7 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Gateway Corporate Center. There is minimal impact on the businesses in the area. Chair/Finnerty asked if the City requires insurance coverage for pr perty damage and personal injury. CSD/Rose stated he is not aware of personal property insurance coverage being required. Chair/Finnerty stated she believes the City has required property d image insurance for parades held on City streets. Mrs. Johnson said that she is generally asked to provide personal injury insurance to the school district and to the City. Mr. Johnson indicated that property damage insurance has not been re uired for the site. However, it is required for parades. CSD/Rose indicated that deductibles are usually not reached on the oc asion of sprinkler head damage. Chair/Finnerty stated she is concerned about damage to the soccerfield's topography and a potential safety hazard to the youth sport's participan . Mr. Johnson stated the Gateway Corporate site was graded once. The cz rnival trucks have not appeared to damage the topography. He indicated that lie has an agreement with the carnival that any damaged sprinkler heads must be repaired. Mr. Johnson indicated that unless it rains during the event, he dos not anticipate that trucks will create ruts. CSD/Rose stated that when the ballfield lights were installed at PetersoriPark, the field was somewhat damaged because it was very wet. The compay that damaged the field imported soil, and filled and smoothed the ruts. CSD/Rose responded to VC10'Connor that the walkway will be instal lec prior to the Ranch Festival event. The walkway is proposed to be a six inch thick concrete structure and is intended to accommodate vehicles such as S eriff's Department vehicles and City trucks. JUNE 12, 1997 PAGE 8 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION C/Medina moved that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommenc that the City Council approve Peterson Park location for the 1997 Ranch Festival event with assurances from the Sheriff's Department that traffic circulatior and parking will not present a problem and that the adjacent condomillium residents are in favor of the event. The motion died for lack of a second. VC/O'Connor indicated she believes this item should be tabled until the City receives a response from the Sheriff's Department and the residences ad j cent to the park. CSD/Rose recommended noticing residents within 1/4 mile of Peterson CSD/Rose indicated the mailing list used for notice of the ballfield lig ting public workshop is available. This Commission cannot conduct p blic hearings, however, the Commission can schedule a public workshop. Chair/Finnerty moved, VC/O'Connor seconded, to place this item on thearks and Recreation Commission's June 26, 1997 meeting agenda and otify residents within 1/4 mile of the requested site, Peterson Park. The motio was approved with the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Holder, VC/O'Connor, Chair/Fin NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Medina, Tye ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None CSD/Rose responded to VC/O'Connor that any resident may serve or the Ranch Festival Committee if invited to do so by the Ranch Festival Boa d of Directors. Mr. Johnson indicated the Festival Committee invites a member of the City Council to serve. They may then appoint anybody they choose. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Chair/Finnerty stated the request discussed at the last Parks and Recreation Comm i sion meeting was to trim the trees at Summitridge Park and not to remove the trees. There was never consideration for removing the trees. ADJOURNMENT: Draft Minutes of June 26, 1997 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting JUNE 26, 1997 A. Recreation Update. PAGE 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION CSS/Bowman presented the Recreation Update. CSS/Bowman responded to Chair/Finnerty that the pep and dance tryout ClOs does not continue through the entire year. Success of the class will determinehether it is scheduled for the entire year. Chair/Finnerty suggested the class would be more useful,if scheduled athe end of the school year in coordination with tryouts. Chair/Finnerty asked if the contract classes are advertised in the Friday section of the Los Angeles Times. CSS/Bowman responded that news releases are mailed to the Los Ange However, she has not seen the news releases published. 4. . OLD BUSINESS 6. Ranch Festival Request for use of Peterson Park. Gabriel Times. CSD/Rose presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Commission request a presentation from the Ranch Festival organizers, receive pub is input, request that staff read into the record any written correspondence received, and to present any information provided over the telephone, provide the Ranch Festival organizers the opportunity to make a followup presentation, conduct deli erabons and forward the Commission's recommendation to the City Council. CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Finnerty that the City provides $8,000 to $10,000 worth of services (Sheriff's Department , shuttle buses, traffic control de ices and Building and Safety Department personnel services) to the Ranch Festivill. Cathy Johnson, 21331 Hi Pass Road, and Michelle Baker, 2511 Castle R ck Road, presented the 1997 Ranch Festival proposal. The Festival is proposing it two day scaled-down event at Peterson Park on Saturday and Sunday, October 4 and 5, 1997 in place of the three day event previously held at the Gateway Corporate Center. Mrs. Johnson indicated there will be a minimal amount o carnival activity; entertainment with the stage facing south toward the SR 60 Fre way; and crafters fair. The Festival represents a wide range within the communi and has JUNE 26, 1997 PAGE 3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIION benefited both the non-profit and retail businesses. Mrs. Johnson stated Ranch Festival carries insurance for its event. She stated that a Department representative is present to address the parking concerns. Chair/Finnerty asked how the Festival will fund its project since the suffered a deficit last year. that the Sheriff's nation Mrs. Johnson responded that as soon as the location for the event is finalized, a major sponsorship and fundraising campaign will be conducted to finance the event. She indicated that by the end of August, last year's deficit will be cleared. The Festival organizers believe that the scaled-down event will realize a profit in 1997. Chair/Finnerty asked if previous contractors will work with the Fest incurred a deficit in 1996. Mrs. Johnson responded that the Festival has contracts with all vendors they will continue to provide service to the Festival. Sgt. Dave Rash, Walnut Sheriff's Station, in charge of all reserve i indicated he is responsible for organizing traffic control for all con community events held in the September -October months. He has wi the Ranch Festival for the past five years. The proposed scaled-down result in reduced traffic. Since there is no Friday night event, there influx of juveniles from neighboring and outlying communities. Sgt. Rash stated he plans to staff the event with approximately 16 Sheriff's. A mobile command post will be established at the event site fr+ evening through Monday morning. Residents adjacent to the park L streets for overflow parking. The Ranch Festival creates no more of a pr traffic control at Peterson Park than at the Gateway Corporate Center. the City sent out .400 mailings, only eight residents (about two percent) r with traffic concerns. Sgt. Rash stated there would be more traffic disr the main Golden Springs Road arterial if the Festival is held at the Corporate Center on Copley Drive. Sgt. Rash responded to Chair/Finnerty that 675 vehicles can be parked c Springs Road between Temple Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard. approves, the Ranch Festival may obtain a temporary variance for the "NI signs. He assured the Commission that safety vehicles will have unit since it believe its. He .ct cities ced with tent will Il be no Deputy i Friday public lem for sponded ption on Gateway Golden the City Parking" erru pted JUNE 26, 1997 PAGE 4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMiSJION access to the neighborhood. Chair/Finnerty asked about response time for illegally parked vehicles. Sgt. Rash responded that the vehicle should be towed within the hour it is provided the area is properly signed. He suggested property owners co Mike Rawlings for assistance with the proper signage. Sgt. Rash responded to VC/O'Connor that the westerly side of Go Road can accommodate 675 parallel parked vehicles between Temple Diamond Bar Boulevard. VC/O'Connor asked what 160 Deputy Sheriff's costs the City for this Sgt. Rash responded that on -duty Deputy Sheriff's would cost approximately $49,000. Uniformed reserve Deputy Sheriff's officers v the City approximately $4,100. No reserve officer receives payment. Festival donation is made to the Booster Club for Walnut Sherif participation. The donated monies are used to purchase equipment. Tl officers would be placed at the event as part of their regular duties. reported itact Sgt. Springs iue and the City auld cost A Ranch s Station •ee active Sgt. Rash indicated to VC/O'Connor that street closure would be done only in the event of an emergency situation. Residents will be given first pri rity after emergency vehicles. Sylvan Glen Road parking cannot be restricted to residents only. . There were no members of the public present who wished to speak CSD/Rose read eight letters from concerned residents and homeowner management companies into the record. Michelle Baker stated that she explained the proposed Festival parkin; Management and McCarthy Management and that it is the Festival intent to create as little disturbance to the community as possible. Shf she offered to meet with the residents of the adjacent condominium i She said she was told there would probably be only two or three resi might respond. Both organizations responded favorably to her present Chair/Finnerty asked about the size of trucks carrying carnival rides. this item. iation to Euclid gan izer's indicated implexes. ents who :icon. -0 . JUNE 26, 1997 PAGE 5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMIS VC/O'Connor asked Mrs. Johnson how the organizers anticipate insu ing that vehicles park on Golden Springs Road and not on Sylvan Glen Road, andhat the potential impact to the residents along Golden Springs Road will be. Mrs. Johnson responded that the Sheriff's Department will have officers qationed along Golden Springs Road to direct traffic. Signs will be placed at the intersection of Golden Springs Road and Sylvan Glen Road that indicates there is nc parking available on Sylvan Glen Road. Mrs. Johnson indicated that a youth group picks up trash in the area of thel Festival. VC/O'Connor reiterated her concerns about the traffic on Sylvan Glen oad and the inconvenience to the residents. She said she believes the Ranch Fe tival is a great benefit to the City and to the non-profit organizations. She indicated she is torn between the two locations, Peterson Park and Gateway Corporale Center because there is no interference with residents at the Gateway Corporate Center location. Chair/Finnerty said she is concerned that the Peterson Park ADA Retrofit walkway improvement will be damaged by heavy trucks carrying carnival equiprr ent. She is also concerned about damage to the park's sprinkler system. She s aced she believes there will be significant damage to the park and that an events such as the Ranch Festival is not a proper use of the park. Peterson Park i a large neighborhood park because of its location. Chair/Finnerty moved to thank the Ranch Festival organization for the r interest and invite them to go back to Gateway Corporate Center for the 1997 event because Peterson Park is not suitable for the type of event that is plarilled. The motion died for lack of a second. Steve Johnson, President, Diamond Bar Ranch Festival, respo ding to VC/O'Connor, asked what weight restrictions the Commission might impose on the event. CSD/Rose stated he would need to investigate what weight restrictionj might be appropriate. He said he is concerned about determining a means by which trucks may traverse the walkway without damaging or breaking the structure. Chair/Finnerty moved, VC10'Connor seconded, to recommend to the C Council O JUNE 26, 1997 PAGE 6 PARKS & RECREATION COMMi SION that the Ranch Festival organization be asked to remain at Gateway Corporate Center due to the problems and damage that the event would most I ikely cause to Peterson Park. VC/O'Connor asked if the Ranch Festival would be willing and able to absorb the cost of potential damage to the new walkway. CSD/Rose suggested the Commission request that the applicant post z $500 to $1,000 security deposit to cover potential damage to the park. CSD/Rose responded to VC/O'Connor that the City absorbs about W000 to $10,000 annually in Ranch Festival expenses (primarily for Sheriff's deput es, traffic control devices, shuttle buses and Building and Safety personnel suppor ). C/Holder suggested the carnival trucks utilize a structure to protect the aikway. CSD/Rose responded that the Commission may suggest that the Rancli Festival attempt mitigation of any potential damage to the sidewalk. Steve Johnson stated the Ranch Festival successfully placed plywood over sprinkler heads at Gateway Corporate Center. There has been no damage to the sidewalk' at that location for the past five years. Chair/Finnerty called for the question. The motion was approved -0 (with Commissioners Medina and Tye being absent). INFORMATION ITEMS, Continued: 3. Request for Proposals (RFP) to install Soda Machines in the City's Parks CSD/Rose reported that in order for the City to place soda machines in the City's parks, the City must complete an RFP process and solicit proposals from at least three competing firms. 4. User Group Meeting. CSD/Rose reported on the Wednesday, June 11 User Group Meeting. 5. Concerts in the Park. A VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSI N t* . . 0: SECRETARY OF THE COWISSION ROM:X,. DATE ,DDRESS: �/ � Gd� PHON )RGANIZATION: ,GENDA #/SUBJECT: V FAVOR OF/AGAINST? IM) / CW ��-- expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council ,y name and address as written above. i VX Signature 22�� utes reflect VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMIS ION r0: SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION :ROM: k0TS /1/E1.Son1 DATE: ADDRESS: '02!40 G2.�o�N Lv, -34 A3Rra � Ca . PHONE: ORGANIZATION: --D-rAKa►✓ �- AGENDA #/SUBJECT: IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST? :37Iy I expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda Item. Please have the Council inutes reflect my name and address as written above. re VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMM] To: =ROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: SECRETARY OFLA-16— THE COMMISSION LJ DATE: PHONE: ION AGENDA #/SUBJECT: J N FAVOR OF/AGAINST? LJ expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council M notes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMIS ION To: SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION =ROM: / DATE: -y ADDRESS:?}57�/EC?l',� PHONE: J� ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: N FAVOR OF/AGAINST? expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council ny name and address as written above. Signature notes reflect Al VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSI N 0: ROM: DDRESS: RGANIZATION: GENDA #/SUBJECT: I FAVOR OF/AGAINST? S RETARY OF THE COMMISSION DATE: PHONI 1 expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Min y name and address as written above. Signature reflect VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMIS ION TO: SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION FROM: i r� DATE: i ADDRESS: 11 Z S ,S CJSf _ PHONE: ORGANIZATION: , AGENDA #/SUBJECT:� i U (�s e. C� �� ' ( n r IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST? 1 expect to address the Commission on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council ftjlinutes reflect my name and address as written above. I re MINUTES OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS JUNE 3, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Werner 2. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Harmony, Herrera, Vice Chairman Huff, Chairman Werner Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director; Frank Usher, Assistant City Manager, Amanda Susskind, Assistant Agency Attorney; James DeStefano, Community Development Director; George Wentz, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director, and Tommye Nice, Deputy Agency Secretary. 2, PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3 Cl 5 CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/Herrera moved, AM/Ansari seconded, to approve Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, VC/Huff, Chair/Werner NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Harmony ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - None 3.1 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated June 3, 1997 in the amount of $2,174.80. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 5.1 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR OF THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM THE PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA - AM/Ansari moved, AM/Herrera seconded, to continue the matter and all related items to June 10, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. for public hearing and continue Council deliberation and action to June 17, 1997. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, Harmony, C/Werner NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: AGENCY MEMBERS - VC/Huff ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - None 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None JUNE 3, 1997 PAGE 2 REDEV. AGENCY 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: None S. AGENCY SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS: None 9. ADJOURNMENT: C/Werner adjourned the Redevelopment Agen meeting at 11:05 p.m. TOMMYE NICE, Deputy Agency Secretary ATTEST: Chairman REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS JUNE 17, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Werner 2. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ansari, Harmony, Herrera, Chairman Werner. Vice Chairman Huff was excused. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director; Frank Usher, Assistant City Manager; Mike Jenkins, Agency Attorney; James DeStefano, Community Development Director; George Wentz, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM Ansari moved, AM/Herrera seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, ClWerner NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Harmony ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - VC/Huff 3.1 APPROVED MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 20, 1997 - As submitted. 3.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER -.dated June 17, 1997, in the amount of $34,509.30. 3.3 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. R-97-10: A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING ADVANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER 4 WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - in the amount of $48,000; approved an adjustment in the budget for FY 96-97 adding $1,000 to the Photocopying account, adding $29,000 to the Professional Services account and adding $18,000 to the Legal Services account; approved an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Rosenow, Spevacek Group, Inc. (R.S.G.), increasing the contract amount by $27,500 to a total of $128,480 and approved an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Cotton Beland Assoc., increasing the contract amount by $1,500 to a total of $55,835. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari, Herrera, ClWerner NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Harmony ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - VC/Huff 4. OLD BUSINESS: None JUNE 17, 1997 PAGE 2 REDEV. AGElkICY 5. NEW BUSINESS: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: AM/Ansari urged her fellow Agency Members to consider holding proactive forums on redevelo ent. AM/Harmony believed the issue of redevelopment should be placed on the ballot for public vote after a specific plan has been developed. e suggested the power of eminent domain be eliminated. AM/Herrera indicated redevelopment can assist communities in accomplishing many positive and beneficial changes. She understa d that it is a complicated issue and many residents fear the unknown. She asked residents to trust in their elected officials to research the matter and make decisions that benefit the City and stated that the Council MerT bers and Agency Members will not engage in practices that put the City a d its residents at risk. C/Werner stated that Council has, for the past 8 years, recognized &ie loss of revenue confronting the City. Several options and opportunities have been investigated. The community continues to voice its desir for increased services and facilities. There has been a significant decrease in the City's business activity and a lack of public improvements. As a esuit, Council has pursued an economic and redevelopment plan to solve t ese problems. At this time, there appear to be no other viable options. F e noted that a large employer (Avery Dennison) has opted to leave D.E. and relocate in Brea because Brea has redevelopment. The question of redevelopment for D.B. is still open for debate. He indicated he is attempting to remain open-minded on the issue. S. AGENCY SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS: None ADJOURNMENT: C/Werner adjourned the Redevelopment Agency meefir g at 10:35 p.m. ATTEST: Chairman LYNDA BURGESS, Agency iry DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Werner and Board of Directors i FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: Voucher Register, July 15, 1997 DATE: July 10, 1997 Attached is the Voucher Register dated July 15, 1997 for the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency. The checks will be produced a ter any recommendations and the final approval is received. Payment of the listed vouchers totalling $44,547.77 allowed from the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Fund. APPROVED BY: Linda G. Onuson Assistant Finance Director Terrence L. Belang Executive Director Gary H. Werner Chairman Robert S. Huff Vice Chairman is he�eby Dizmunrl Par P 'PIN TIME: 15:19`7'- /97`r0JCk ER G. STGR DUE THP -J, .. . ....... . .. 07 ," r;' 7 � 1 VENDOR N�ME VE r�2€1R ID. --- S 'q• iFACCINT P^ ,Tvh-h R te? r4.L'dEl'1C, E rr,;LLE DEQ-IFT=GFY i -;iC,r uE; "f --------------- D;ri & Ni -hl CopV Ce,-,ta^ IEa % h, 002-4110-2110 421 COMA 01/5954 071/69 0611K, 00414 Rd',Ip�tC IoChf3p5 97.43 32-4110-2:10 44 03715A 01/5153 1071109 06/30 0388 rUPyi^p5vcs-Rdulpmtt TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 194.83 Pichards Matson & yershon RichardsWa 032-4110-4000 89 307151 W'16L64 37/09 06/34 92409 Legal SVCS-Rdvlpint 16,470.03 002-4110-4020 27 80715A 01/5300 07/09 061O 9-2409legalSvcs-4dvlp ,-t 4,688= 88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 21,150.91 Rosenow SevacBk Group Rosenow 002-4110-4000 85 80715€1 01/5904 3.7/09 06/30 Phase2-RDA Plan -Prof Svcs 14,811,92 002-4110-4000 87 OK715A 015.975 07/09 06'3 ProfSvCa-Phse2PlanRdvlpmt 81382=11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 23,194=3:3 TOTAL PEFAID -----------; t1.'J3 TQTAL DUE ---------------1 44,547,77 TOTAL R'EFORT------------7 44.547.77 * * * Dl --Mond Bar R I ; 4* R,uNir IME: , 19 ,7 rjaI - Ju�cHER REGISTER ;E < F ND 8UMMWR'f REP0RT I E THRL'.............!),7 1fi 7 DISbDUR E G.1 IL GLE WILL P98 -i #JJE HAS POSTED RJ URE TRA1�SA€TI�ONS ' ''D TOTAL QTRECT PAY REVEMMEXPENSE nitd E EXPENSE EXPENSE "= 44,547.7? 44;547.77 TOTAL------------ ------------ ------------ � �------------------------ ------------ ALL FTND'S 44.547.77 ------ 447,:47. ------ 1, DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Chairman and Board Members MEETING DATE: July 1, 1997 REPORT DATE: June 26, 1997 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director TITLE: A Resolution of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Approving and Adopting a Budget for the Dmond Bar Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year Commencing July 1, 1997 and Ending June 30, 1998 Inuding Appropriation of Funds for Accounts, Departments, Divisions, Objects and Purposes Therein Set Fol. SUMMARY: Submitted for your approval and adoption is the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Budget for FY 07-98. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution R 97 -XXX, adopting the FY 97-98 Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report —Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Cleric's Ordinance(s) _ Other: Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority vote? _ Yes No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY.: Terrence L. Belanger Executive Director 9 t 17 Linda 0. DEPARTMENT HEAD: RESOLUTION NO. R97 - A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 11 1997 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1998, INCLUDING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH. A. Recitals (i) The Executive Director has heretofore prep red and presented to the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors a proposed budget for the Agency's fiscal year 1997 98, including staffing, operations, and appropriations ther for (referred to the "Budget" sometimes hereinafter). (ii) Copies of the Agency Budget are on file in the office of the City Clerk labeled "Diamond Bar Redevelopment Ag ncy 1997-98 Fund Budget" and said Budget hereby is made a part of his Resolution. (iii) The Agency has conducted a public meeting on the fiscal year 1997-98 Budget and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: ,1. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, 1.3art A, of this Resolution. 2, The Budget, including the changes enumerated and directed to be made by the Board during the course of the Ag ncy meeting conducted by the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Board, hereby is adopted as the Budget of the Diamond Bar Redevelop ent Agency for the Fiscal Year commencing July, 1997 and ending Tune 30, 1998 and consisting of the estimated and anticipated reve ues and expenditures for that fiscal year. 3. There are hereby appropriated for obligations and expenditures by the Executive Director the amounts shown in the line objects set forth in the Budget. All obligations and expenditures shall be incurred and made in the manner provided by the provisions of State law and City ordinances and resolutions applicable to purchasing and contracting, which are adopted herewith by reference. 4. Subject to further provision of this Resolution, the appropriations made above constitute the maximum amount authorized for obligation and expenditure by the Executive Director for respective line objects as set forth in the Budget. Each Agency employee shall be"responsible, as well as the Executive Director, for seeing that said maximum amounts are not exceeded. 5. No warrant shall issue nor shall any indebtedness be incurred which exceeds the unexpended balance of the fund and Agency appropriations hereinabove authorized unless such appropriations shall have been amended by a supplem ntal appropriation duly enacted by the Board, or by individual appropriations within any aforesaid line objects, except insofar as the Executive Director may authorized transfers pursuant to this Resolution. 6. The Executive Director hereby is authorized to transfer funds appropriated hereby or by supplemental appropriation as follows: With respect to those classifications designated by code 1000 series, 2000 series, 4000 series, 5000 series and ode 6000 series, the Executive Director may transfer amounts bet een and within those classifications, but only within the Agencynd. 7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of his Resolution_ PASSED, ADOP'T'ED AND APPROVED this day of , 1997. Chairman I, LYNDA BURGESS, Secretary of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foreg ing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meetinj of the Board of Directors of Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency held on the day of 1997, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS: ATTEST: Secretary of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency a ' F DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGEN FUND BUDGET �lJit`3 TYRE O 1997-98 Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, the City of Diamond Bar established the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency on April 2, 1996. Redevelopment is the primary tool used by cities in California to revitalize neighborhoods & business districts. As in many cities, the purpose of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency is to provide a mechanism for economic development activities. Current funding for the Agency is being provided by a $125,000 loan from the City. It is anticipated that this obligation will be repaid from tax increment revenues. 1996-97 Executive Director DBRDJA Board sted Budget Recommended Appiroved ESTIMATED RESOURCES: 2550 Reserve Fund Balance Loan Proceeds 327,050 23,750 3610 Interest Revenue TOTAL $327,050 $23,750 APPROPRIATIONS: 1200 Operating Supplies 10 $0 2100 Photocopying 1,500 1,500 2110 Printing 4,450 1,500 2115 Advertising 26,000 1,000 2120 Postage 450 500 2320 Publications 250 250 2325 Meetings 490 500 2330 Travel-Conf & Mtgs 400 1,500 2340 Education & Training 0 500 2352 Promotional Items 0 1,500 4000 Professional Services 231,500 0 4020 Legal Services 62,000 15,000 4100 Director Compensation 0 0 TOTAL $327,050 $23,750 TO: Honorable Chairman and Agency Members VIA: Terrence L. Banger, Execiltive Director FROM: Amanda Susskind and Robin Harris, Agency Counsel DATE: July 15, 1997 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION REDEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT REVITALIZATION BACKGROUND: OF A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR AGENCY DECLARING ITS POLICY TO ACCOM LISH OF THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC AREA WITHOUT THE USE OF EMINENT DO IN On July 1, 1997, the City Council introduced an ordinance approving a redevelopment plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area"]. During discussion of the ordinance, the Council directed staff to prepare a resolution for the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agenc (the "Agency") declaring a policy not to use its power of em vent domain. DISCUSSION: The Redevelopment Plan contains authority for the Agency to exercise the power of eminent domain provided that condemnat o proceedings are commenced within 12 years after adoption of th Redevelopment Plan. However, the Agency has not commenced aily eminent domain proceedings. Nor is it presently considering acquisition of any private property except through voluntary purchase. As set forth in the ordinance approving the Redevelopment Plan, the authority of the Agency to acquire property in the Project Area by eminent domain is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan because the type and extent of parcel assemblage required cannot always be accomplished by private developers without Agency assistance. In addition, the prov cion of needed public improvements may require eminent domain. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the goal of the Agency is to accomplish all redevelopment with as little displacement as possible and to accomplish the redevelopment of the Project Area without the use of eminent domain. The attached resolution declares the policy of the Agency to accomplish all redevelopment of the Project Area without the use of eminent domain.. To that end, the resolution provides that the Agency shall not comme ce proceedings to acquire property by eminent domain, without the consent of the property owner, so long as the Resolution is in effect. The Resolution further provides that the Agency will not repeal the Resolution unless the Agency has first conducted 970707 10572-00024 rdh 1672926 0 noticed public hearing at which interested persons may testify regarding the Agency's power of eminent domain. Such public hearing shall be prior to and in addition to any hearing required by the Eminent Domain haw (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230. 010, et s_ etc . ) In addition to the Agency adopting the attached Resolution, he City Council may formally amend the Redevelopment Plan to eliminate or restrict the Agency's power of eminent domain. The Redevelopment Plan could be amended by ordinance of the City Council following a noticed joint public hearing of the City Council and the Agency on the amendment. Such an amendmentould have no effect on the base year assessment roll for the Proj ct Area. The Agency and City Council may follow a simplified process to consider this type of amendment (for example, a preliminary report is not required).. The Agency must prepare a report to the City Council (which need only contain information relevant t eminent domain) and make the report available to the public rior to the joint public hearing on the amendment. Notice of the joint public hearing must.be published once a week for three weeks prior to the date, of the joint public hearing. In addition, notice must be mailed to taxing entities, property owners, residents and businesses in the Project Area at leas 30 days prior to the date of the joint public hearing. Following the joint public hearing, the City Council may ado t an ordinance amending the Redevelopment Plan. There is no requirement to adopt written responses to written objections. If the Agency and the City Council commenced proceedings to ame d the Redevelopment Plan at their August 5, 1997, meeting and mailed notice of the joint public hearing by August 15, 1997 the Agency and City Council could hold a joint public hearing on the amendment and introduce the ordinance amending the Redevelopment Plan on September 16, 1997. The City Council could then adopt the ordinance amending the Redevelopment Plan on October 7, 1997. F"Aalefe)�I�00�IPJA*-k*)ZF It is recommended that the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency consider adoption of the attached resolution and direct staf as appropriate_ 970707 10572-00024 rdh 1672926 0 - 2 RESOLUTION NO. R-97-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING ITS POLICY TO ACCOMPLISH REDEVELOPMENT OF THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA WITHOUT EMINENT DOMAIN RECITALS: A. By its Ordinance No. 03 (1997), the City Council of City of Diamond Bar approved and adopted the Redevelopment P (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area (the "Project Area"). B. The Redevelopment Plan provides that the Agency may acquire property in the Project Area by eminent domain. The Redevelopment Plan further provides that the Agency must commence eminent domain proceedings within 12 years of the date of adoption of Ordinance No. 03 (1997). However, the Agency has not commenced any eminent domain proceedings. Nor is the Agency presently considering acquisition of any private property exept through voluntary purchase. C. As set forth in Ordinance No. 03 (1997), the authority of the Agency to acquire property in the Project Area by emi en domain is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan because the type and extent of parcel assemblage required ca no always be accomplished by private developers without Agency assistance. In addition, the provision of needed public improvements may require eminent domain. D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the goal of the Age cy is to accomplish all redevelopment with as little displaceme t as possible and to accomplish the redevelopment of the Project Area without the use of eminent domain. NOW THEREFORE, THE DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HERBY FINDS, DECLARES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Agency hereby finds and declares that it shall be the policy of the Agency to accomplish all redevelopment of the Project Area without the use of eminent domain. To that end, the Agency hereby declares that it sha 1 not commence proceedings to acquire property by eminent domain, without the consent of the property owner, so long as this Resolution is in effect. The Agency hereby declares that it will not repeal this Resolution unless the Agency has first condu ted a noticed public hearing, notice of which is provided in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33452, at whi h interested persons may testify regarding the Agency's power Df eminent domain. Such public hearing shall be prior to and i addition to any hearing required by the Eminent Domain Law ( ode of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010, et 999-)- 970721 10572-00001 rdh/gp 1672925 2 adoption. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect upon its PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this , 1997. Cha ATTEST: Secretary day of I, LYNDA BURGESS, Secretary of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agenc held on the 15th day of July, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: 970721 10572-00001 rdh/gp 9672925 2 BOARD MEMBERS: BOARD MEMBERS: BOARD MEMBERS: BOARD MEMBERS ATTEST: Secretary of the Dia: Redevelopment Agency - 2 - Ba