HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/5/1996cit'19
C 01KRCI
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 5, 1996
6:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Mayor Eileen Ansari
Mayor Pro Tem Bob Huff
Council Member Clair W. Harmony
Council Member Carol Herrera
Council Member
City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
Gary Werner
Terrence L. Belanger
Michael Jenkins
Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports, or other written documentation relating to agenda items, are on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item,
please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodations) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk
a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
� 111,1!111111 1.11:
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking " - , The City of Diamond Bar uses reQgf ed paper
in the Council Chambers. and encourages you to do the same.
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar City Council are open to the public. A member of the public may address the
Council on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar City Council. A request to address the Council should be submitted in writing to the
City Clerk.
As a general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in
order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their
presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit the public input on any item or the
total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the
business of the Council.
Individuals are requested to refrain from personal attacks toward Council Members or other persons. Comments
which are not conducive to a positive business meeting environment are viewed as attacks against the entire City
Council and will not be tolerated. If not complied with, you will forfeit your remaining time as ordered by the Chair.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public
comment on items previously considered by the Council. (Does not apply to Committee meetings)
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the City Council must be posted at least
72 hours prior to the Council meeting. In cases of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Council may act on an item that is not on the posted
agenda.
CONDUCT IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Chair shall order removed from the Council Chambers any person who commits the following acts in respect
to a regular or special meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council.
A. Disorderly behavior toward the Council or any member of the thereof, tending to interrupt the due and orderly
course of said meeting.
B. A breach of the peace, boisterous conduct or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the due and orderly
course of said meeting.
C. Disobedience of any lawful order of the Chair, which shall include an order to be seated or to refrain from
addressing the Board; and
D. Any other unlawful interference with the due and orderly conduct of said meeting.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL
Agendas for the regular Diamond Bar City Council meetings are prepared by the City Clerk and are available 72
hours prior to the meeting. Agendas are available electronically and may be accessed by a personal computer
through a phone modem.
Every meeting of the City Council is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal
charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public
speaking area. Sign language interpreter services are also available by giving notice at least three business days
in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 860-2489 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Council, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 860-2489
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Information (909) 860-2489
NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA.
1.
2.
3.
CLOSED SESSION:
CALL TO ORDER:
Next Resolution No. 96-72
Next Ordinance No. 04(1996)
None
6:30 p.m. November 5, 1996
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Presentation of Colors by
Ganesha High School JROTC
ROLL CALL: Council Members Harmony,
Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.1 Presentation by Mike Nelson re "Savvy" Award given to the
City by 3CMA (City -County Communications and Marketing
Association).
3.2 Presentations to representatives from Danyang, China
BUSINESS PERSON OF THE MONTH:
3.3 Presentation of City Tile to Diamond Bar Honda.
Continued from October 15, 1996.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments,
pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take
any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please
complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk
(completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five
minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 VETERANS DAY - November 11, 1996 - City Offices will be
closed. Will reopen Tuesday, November 12, 1996.
5.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - November 14, 1996 -
7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 19, 1996 - 6:30 p.m.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
NOVEMBER 5, 1996 PAGE 2
6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 15, 1996
- Approve as submitted.
Requested by: City Clerk
6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of
September 9, 1996 - Receive and file.
Requested by: Community Development Director
6.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular
Meeting of September 12, 1996 - Receive and file.
Requested by: City Engineer
6.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
A. Regular Meeting of August 22, 1996 - Receive and
file.
B. Regular Meeting of September 26, 1996 - Receive and
file.
Requested by: Community Services Director
6.5 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated
November 5, 1996 in the amount of $712,620.17.
Requested by: City Manager
6.6 TREASURER'S REPORT - for the month of September, 1996 -
Receive and file.
Requested by: City Manager
6.7 CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES:
A) Filed by Chairit Phadungslip on October 11, 1996.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the
City Council reject the request and refer the
matter for further action to Carl Warren & Co., the
City's Risk Manager.
B) Filed by Samuel Rich on October 18, 1996.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the
City Council reject the requests and refer them for
further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's
Risk Manager.
Requested by: City Clerk
6.8 RESOLUTION NO.96-XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INSTALLING A RED CURB ON THE
NOVEMBER 5, 1996 PAGE 3
NORTH SIDE OF MONTEFINO AVENUE BETWEEN THE DIAMOND BAR
POST OFFICE'S GENERAL PUBLIC DRIVEWAY AND DIAMOND BAR
BOULEVARD, 15 FEET EASTERLY FROM CURB RETURN OF THE "POST
OFFICE TRUCKS ONLY" DRIVEWAY AND 15 FEET WESTERLY FROM
THE CURB RETURN OF THE POST OFFICE'S GENERAL PUBLIC
DRIVEWAY - The Traffic & Transportation Commission
recommends that a red curb on the north side of Montefino
Ave. between the D.B. Post Office's general public
driveway and Diamond Bar Blvd., 15 ft. easterly from curb
return of the "Post Office Trucks Only" driveway and 15
ft. westerly from the curb return of the post office's
general public driveway be installed. The recommendation
is based on the need to minimize visibility restrictions
for Post Office employees/customers.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No.96-XX approving the
installation of a red curb on the north side of Montefino
Ave. between the D.B. Post Office's General Public
driveway and Diamond Bar Blvd., 15 ft. easterly from curb
return of the "Post Office Trucks Only" driveway and 15
ft. westerly from the curb return of the Post Office's
General public driveway.
Requested by: City Engineer
6.9 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FUNDS FOR
LEFT -TURN TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONSTRUCTION ON DIAMOND BAR
BLVD./MOUNTAIN LAUREL WAY, DIAMOND BAR BLVD./GOLDEN
SPRINGS DR., AND BREA CANYON RD./GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. - On
February 6, 1996, Council awarded a $7,000 not -to -exceed
amount to Warren C. Siecke for construction inspection
for left -turn traffic signals construction on Diamond Bar
Blvd./Mountain Laurel Way, Diamond Bar Blvd./Golden Spgs.
Dr., and Brea Canyon Rd./Golden Spgs. Dr. Due to the
unforeseen removal of an abandoned traffic signal and
street light foundations, damaged conduit, timing plans,
and the need to coordinate these issues with all affected
parties, an additional $3,000 is requested.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve an additional $3,000 to Warren C. Siecke
for construction inspection for left -turn traffic signals
construction on Diamond Bar Blvd./Mountain Laurel Way,
Diamond Bar Blvd./Golden Spgs. Dr., and Brea Canyon
Rd./Golden Springs Dr.
Requested by: City Engineer
6.10 RESOLUTION NO. 96-53A: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS
REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS,
LEAVES OF ABSENCES AND OTHER REGULATIONS" AND BUDGET
ADJUSTMENT - Due to adjustments to several allocated
NOVEMBER 5, 1996 PAGE 4
positions and their job responsibilities, it is proposed
that these positions be modified and a new position for
a part-time Transportation Clerk be created. These
changes include the reduction of one Administrative
Assistant position from full-time to 30 hours per week;
increase the hours of the Planning Technician from 30
hours a week to full-time; addition of one Administrative
Intern position in the City Manager's Office and creation
of a part-time Transportation Clerk position with salary
range. The Transportation Clerk position will be funded
through the Prop A - Transit Passes project.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve: the position modifications, the proposed
Transportation Clerk position, the budget adjustment for
personnel and adopt Exhibit A and B of Resolution No. 96-
53A.
Requested by: City Manager
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 RESOLUTION NO.96-XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 52203 A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.3 GROSS
ACRE SITE INTO SIXTEEN NUMBERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 6 LETTERED LOTS FOR STREETS
AND LANDSCAPING AND THE ADDENDUM TO THE EIR FOR SOUTH
POINTE MASTER PLAN (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 3 92081040),
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD, NORTH OF
PATHFINDER ROAD IN DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.- The
applicant, Diamond Crest Estates, requests approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.52203, the subdivision of
a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single
family residential development and 6 lettered lots for
streets and landscaping.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and
adopt Resolution No.96-XX approving Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 52203, a request to subdivide a 6.3 gross acre
site into sixteen numbered lots for single family
residential development and 6 lettered lots for streets
and landscaping and the addendum to the EIR for South
Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040),
located on the west side of Brea Canyon Rd., North of
Pathfinder Rd.
Requested by: Community Development Director
8. OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 ORDINANCE NO. XX(1996): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULATING STORM WATER AND
NOVEMBER 5, 1996
PAGE 5
URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION AND AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR
MUNICIPAL CODE - As a co -permittee, the City is required
to adopt an ordinance and implement procedures with
respect to the entry of non -storm water discharges into
the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) and
submit it to the County by November 28,1996. This
ordinance will provide the City with the legal authority
necessary to control discharges to and from those
portions of the MS4 over which the City has jurisdiction
as required by the permit and thereby comply with the
terms of the NPDES permit.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve for first reading by title only and waive
full reading of Ordinance No.XX (1996) regulating storm
water and urban runoff pollution and amending the Diamond
Bar Municipal Code.
Requested by: City Engineer
9. NEW BIISINESS: None
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
3. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Next Resolution No. R-96-09
Chairman Werner
Agency Members Ansari, Harmony,
Herrera, Vice -Chairman Huff,
Chairman Werner
3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 15, 1996
- Approve as submitted.
Requested by: Agency Secretary
3.2 VOUCHER REGISTER: Approve Voucher Register dated
November 5, 1996 in the amount of $1,289.75.
Requested by: Executive Director
4. OLD BIISINESS:
4.1 ADJUSTMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. - On April 2, 1996, the
Agency approved a contract with R.S.G. in the amount of
$42,080 for preparation of a redevelopment feasibility
study. On September 24, 1996, the Agency approved a
subsequent contract with R.S.G. for redevelopment plan
NOVEMBER 5, 1996 PAGE 6
preparation and adoption services and map and legal
description preparation services. In reviewing the first
invoice for the plan preparation contract, some of the
services relate to the feasibility study contract, and
should be allocated appropriately. The amount for these
services is $2,124.31. This additional amount was
incurred under the first contract because of assessment
appeals analysis and meeting time required beyond that
anticipated in the original proposal and contract.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve an adjustment to the redevelopment
services agreement with Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
(R.S.G.), dated April 2, 1996, adding an amount of
$2,125.
Requested by: Executive Director
5. NEW BUSINESS:
6. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS:
7. AGENCY SOB -COMMITTEE REPORTS:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADJOURNMENT:
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS:
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council -
members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Regular Meeting in
the AQMD Auditorium, located at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond
Bar, California at 6:30 p.m. on November 5, 1996.
I, LYNDA BURGESS declare as follows:
I am the City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that a copy
of the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar City
Council, to be held on November 5, 1996 was posted at their
proper locations.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and
that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 1st day of
November, 1996, at Diamond Bar, California.
/s/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
TFWrl1 C:►1 3
TO: Chairman and Members of the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director 1
SUBJECT: Adjustment to Redevelopment Services Contract with Rosenow Spevacek
Group, Inc. - $2,125.00
DATE: November 5, 1996
Recommendation:
That the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency (Agency) approve a contract adjustment to the
redevelopment services contract with Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. (R.S.G.), dated
April 2, 1996, adding an amount of $2,125.00.
Background:
On April 2, 1996, the Agency approved a contract with R.S.G. in the amount of $42,080 for the
preparation of a redevelopment feasibility study. On September 24, 1996, the Agency approved
a subsequent contract with R.S.G. for redevelopment plan preparation and adoption services and
map and legal description preparation services. In reviewing the first invoice for the plan
preparation contract, some of the services relate to the feasibility study contract, and should be
allocated appropriately. The amount for these services is $2,124.31. This additional amount
was incurred under the first contract because of assessment appeals analysis and meeting time
required beyond that anticipated in the original proposal and contract.
VOLUNTARY HEQUE5T I U ADDRE55 THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: (�m4c AOry DATE: 1119-114
ADDRESS: PHONE:
ORGANIZATION: �f}tthc C45t �oEM AtZ*S 0l?6A-#,j TWT/&k
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
i
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
- i
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
OCTOBER 16, 1996 11*4P4
CLOSED SESSION: None held.
2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ansari called the meeting to order at 6:40
p.m. in the SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Colors presented and Pledge of Allegiance led
by Boy Scout Troop 737.
ROLL CALL: Council Members Harmony, Herrera, Werner,
Mayor Pro Tem Huff, Mayor Ansari.
Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Frank Usher,
Assistant City Manager; Amanda Susskind, Assistant City Attorney; James
DeStefano, Community Development Director; David Liu, Deputy Director of
Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and Lynda Burgess,
City Clerk.
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
3.1 Presented Certificates of Recognition to members of Boy Scout Troop 737
for being the first troop to complete the fifty mile hike along the Silver
Moccasins Trail on its Golden Anniversary.
3.2 Presented City Tile to Troy Butzlaff for his efforts to relocate the City of
Industry Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Also presented Certificate of
Appreciation from Congressman Kim's office.
3.3 Presented City Tile to Peter Lewandowski for his efforts to relocate the City
of Industry Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Also presented Certificate of
Appreciation from Congressman Kim's office.
3.4 Proclaimed October 24, 1996 as "United Nations Day."
3.5 Proclaimed October 26, 1996 as "Make a Difference Day."
3.6 Proclaimed October 27 -November 2, 1996 as "World Population Awareness
Week."
BUSINESS PERSON OF THE MONTH:
3.7 Presentation of City Tile to Diamond Bar Honda. Continued to November 5,
1996.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Nona Edelen, Government Relations
Representative, Metropolitan Water District, spoke about the importance of the Bay
Delta water supply to the Southern California area.
In response to C1Werner, Ms. Edelen explained that the Metropolitan Water District
has a "readiness to serve" charge. Currently, the charge is at the discretion of local
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 2
districts to determine its imposition. Local districts have requested the charge be
imposed at the regional level and the matter is under consideration by the Board
of Directors. Three Valleys Water District represents the community to the
Metropolitan Water District.
Martha Bruske expressed concern about areas labeled "not a part" on the City's
proposed redevelopment project area map. She asked why Lorbeer is the only
school included in the project area and why some parks are shown and others are
not shown. She also asked why the City's Sphere of Influence is not included in the
redevelopment project area map.
Don Schad thanked the City for providing transportation to the August CalEx
exposition. He spoke about the destruction of native flora by non-native flora in
D.B.'s park areas. He offered to explore public access areas, identify species,
provide a list to the City's Community Services Director and assist in the proper
control of invasive plant species. With respect to Consent Calendar Item 6.4, Mr.
Shad stated that the agenda packet did not contain information regarding the
Sycamore Canyon stream pollution. Regarding Consent Calendar Item 6.5, he
asked what species of trees are proposed for planting in the City's parkways, how
the public walkways will be maintained and what replacement factor applies.
CM/Belanger responded to Mr. Shad that Claremont Colleges graduate school is
evaluating the pollution area and will, as a class project, design a filtration system
to interface between the water flowing from the pipe and into the downstream area.
The City anticipates a progress report toward the end of the current semester.
CSD/Rose explained that crepe myrtle trees will replace the bronze loquat trees on
Washington St. The City contracts monthly to maintain a 7 ft. overhead clearance
above the public walkways. He indicated that he would contact Mr. Shad regarding
his offer of assistance.
Jerry Boykin, D.B. Chamber of Commerce President, thanked C/Herrera and
MPT/Huff for assisting the Chamber with its recent membership drive.
Terry Birrell stated that, in her opinion, residents in Area A who fought for
incorporation to avoid development would be interested to know that these areas
are included in the proposed redevelopment area. She referred to a Notice of
Public Hearing from the Community Development Department indicating a hearing
date of Monday, November 5, 1996, which should have said Tuesday, November
5. She asked that due to the error, the City re -notice the Public Hearing. Further,
she suggested that Redevelopment Agency meetings be scheduled on the Council
agenda following "Special Presentations, Certificates, Proclamations."
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 L.A. COUNTY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ROUNDUP - October
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 3
20, 1996, 1300 block of Bridgegate Dr., Gateway Corporate Center.
5.2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - October 24, 1996 - 7:00 p.m.,
AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION - October 28, 1996 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 TOWN HALL MEETING - Joint Meeting with Parks & Recreation
Commission - November 2, 1996 - 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., Heritage Park
Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
5.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 5, 1996 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Werner moved, C/Herrera seconded, to
approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously by the following Roll
Call vote (C/Harmony abstained from voting on approval of the Rutan & Tucker
invoice on the Warrant Register):
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
NOES COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
6.1 APPROVED MINUTES:
A. Regular Meeting of September 17, 1996 as submitted.
B. Regular Meeting of September 24, 1996 as submitted.
C. Regular Meeting of October 1, 1996 as submitted.
6.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated October 15, 1996 in the amount
of $605,579.90.
6.3 REJECTED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Jill McKinsey September 9,
1996, and referred the matter for further action to Carl Warren & Co., the
City's Risk Manager.
6.4 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR TO SYCAMORE
CANYON PARK CHANNEL - to Gueno Development Co. in the amount of
$30,963, plus an additional $1,500 for a contingency of 3%. Further,
amended the CIP budget to reflect the actual FEMA reimbursement
received.
6.5 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR PLANTING OF PARKWAY TREES - to Green
Giant Landscape, the lowest responsive bidder, in the amount of $8,814,
plus an additional amount not to exceed $1,500 (contingency) if needed.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 4
8. OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SOILS AND
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - Dr. Rhodes expressed
concern that the most cost effective consultant be utilized.
Following discussion, C/Werner moved, C/Harmony seconded to award
contracts to Converse Consultants West; Engineering & Environmental
Geology Assoc.; Kleinfelder and Leighton & Assoc. to provide professional
soils and geotechnical engineering services on an as -needed basis for a
period of two years commencing October 21, 1996 with the possibility of 3
additional annual renewals, subject to the City Attorney's final approval of
the Consulting Services agreement. Motion carried unanimously by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
8.2 AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL PLAN
CHECKING AND PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS SERVICES - In response
to C/Harmony, CM/Belanger explained that although staff awards contracts
on a numerical rotation basis, contract amounts differ. He suggested that
additional tiers be created to narrow the difference in dollar amounts.
C/Harmony requested quarterly reports be provided to Council.
In response to MPT/Huff, CM/Belanger stated that by responding to the RFP,
the consultants accepted the rotational proposal and fixed fees.
C/Werner asked about potential conflict when one of the consulting firms
serves as the City's Engineer.
ACA/Susskind responded that the City would have less liability when two
independent consultants conduct and review the work completed.
C/Herrera stated that, in her opinion, it is commendable that the City is
sharing the work with several consultants. She asked why two consultants
had been added to the list.
DPW/Liu responded that 28 proposals were received and 10 firms were
interviewed. The selection committee felt that the two additional companies
were equally qualified. The two firms were added to augment the City's
professional capabilities.
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 5
John Freidrich, GFB-Freidrich & Assoc., stated that the three tier rotation
system presented by the City is acceptable to his firm. Further, he
understood and accepted the statistical probability that his firm may receive
the least or the largest amount of fees.
John Bourgoise, Exec. Vice President, Hall & Forman, stated that he would
like the rotation process to result in fair equity. He indicated that staff had
made every effort to be certain that all contracted firms receive a fair share
of the work and profit. Further, stated he believed the present tier system is
fair and equitable and that he is perfectly satisfied with the current system.
Domonic Malado, Pres., RKA Civil Engineers, stated that his firm was happy
to accept the contract as stated and continue working with the City.
C/Werner moved, M/Ansari seconded to award contracts to Bryan A. Stirrat
Assoc.; Charles Abbot Assoc.; Dewan, Lundin & Assoc.; GFB-Freidrich &
Assoc., Hall & Forman and RKA Civil Engineers to provide professional plan
checking and public works inspection services on an as -needed basis, for
a period of two years commencing October 21, 1996 with the possibility of
3 additional annual renewals, subject to the City Attorney's final approval of
the Consulting Services Agreement. In addition, staff will provide the City
Council with a bi-annual progress report. With the following Roll Call vote,
motion carried unanimously:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
8.3 AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC AND
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES - C/Werner moved,
C/Herrera seconded to award contracts to Austin -Foust Associates; DKS;
Linscott Law & Greenspan; Meyer Mohaddes Assoc.; O'Rourke Engineering,
and Warren Siecke to provide professional traffic and transportation
engineering services on an as -needed basis for a period of two years,
commencing October 21, 1996 with the possibility of 3 additional annual
renewals, subject to the City Attorney's final approval of the Consulting
Services Agreement. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 6
9. NEW BUSINESS:
9.1 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED PROPOSITION 218 - VOTER APPROVAL
FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAXES, LIMITATIONS ON FEES,
ASSESSMENTS, AND CHARGES - Martha Bruske felt that it was
inappropriate for Council to discuss this matter.
Gary Neely concurred with Mrs. Bruske.
Following discussion, MPT/Huff moved, C/Werner seconded to take a
neutral position on proposed Proposition 218. With the following Roll Call
vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff,
M/Ansari
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
9.2 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSITION 204 - SAFE, CLEAN, RELIABLE WATER
SUPPLY ACT - C/Harmony moved, MPT/Huff seconded to suspend
discussion on Items 9.2 and 9.3. Motion was carried 3-2 by the following
Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, MPT/Huff, M/Ansari
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Werner
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
9.3 DISCUSSION RE: PROPOSITION "A" SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
ACT OF 1996 - Discussion suspended by Council vote on Item 9.2 above.
9.4 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED TRIP BY MAYOR ANSARI TO CHINA AS
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - M/Ansari presented her itinerary and stated that
she will return to D.B. on October 30.
RECESS: M/Ansari recessed the City Council meeting at 8:33 p.m. to convene
the Redevelopment Agency meeting. M/Ansari then left the meeting.
RECONVENE: MPT/Huff reconvened the City Council meeting at 10:10 p.m.
9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: C/Herrera stated that the City to City
Chino Hills/D.B. subcommittee met with Chino Hills Council Members to consider
a possible joint meeting with the City of Industry to discuss potential uses of vacant
land between D.B. and Chino Hills.
OCTOBER 15, 1996 PAGE 7
MPT/Huff reported that he and M/Ansari attended the League of California Cities
meeting on October 3. He indicated a video presentation of pros and cons
regarding proposed Proposition 218 would be available to citizens at City Hall. On
October 4, he and C/Herrera attended the Council of Government Legislative
Summit in San Gabriel. He encouraged D.B. business owners to support the
Chamber of Commerce.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Harmony announced that the D.B./
Walnut branch of the American Association of University Women will hold a voter
information night on Tuesday, October 22, 7:00 p.m. at Heritage Park. Discussion
will include Propositions 209, 214, 216, 208, 212, 207 and 211.
C/Werner stated that Proposition A, if approved, would generate revenue available
for park enhancement or property acquisition of approximately $276,000 to the City
over the next 25 years. However, the assessment to each property owner is
calculated to be $6.76 per year, which would generate $2.9 to $4.5 million. He
cautioned voters to examine the circumstances of the proposed Proposition.
C/Herrera reiterated that it is important for the voters to investigate all of the facts
of Proposition A and other ballot propositions. She stated that she had represented
the City at the L.A. County Board of Supervisors and the Private Industry Council
Supervisorial District in the Job Training Partnership Act Recognition Awards
Banquet on Thursday, October 10. She also represented the City at St. Denis's
Silver Jubilee Auction and dinner on Saturday, October 12 and the mass conducted
by Cardinal Roger Mahoney on Sunday, October 13.
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None
12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to
conduct, MPT/Huff adjourned the meeting at 10:19 p.m.
ATTEST:
Mayor
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Goldenberg called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. at the
South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairman
Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Goldenberg, Vice Chairman Ruzicka,
Commissioners and Schad and Fong.
Absent: Commissioner McManus.
Also Present: Community Development Director James
DeStefano, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer George Wentz, Senior Planner
Catherine Johnson, Assistant Planner Ann
Lungu, City Attorney William Rudell, and
Recording Secretary Carol Dennis.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Road, referring to Conditional
Use Permit No. 94-7, stated he is concerned about landscaping,
undergrounding of utilities, and fuel storage. In addition, he
indicated his concerns about the project's impact on the Walnut
Valley Unified School District's slope revegetation and irrigation
system on the southerly portion of the Diamond Bar High School
property. He pointed out that L.A. Cellular's subcontractor has
installed an improper drainage system and damaged the school
district's sprinkler system which has resulted in erosion on the
slope adjacent to Fountain Springs Road at Brea Canyon Road.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of August 26, 1996.
VC/Ruzicka made a motion, seconded by C/Schad to approve the
minutes of August 26, 1996 as presented. The motion was
approved 3-1-1 with C/Fong abstaining.
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS - None
September 9, 1996 Page 2 Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.16.020 Vesting
Tentative Tract 52203 is a request to subdivide a 6.3
gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single family
residential development and six (6) lettered lots for
streets and landscaping. This proposal is a further
subdivision of Lots 92 and 93 of Vesting Tentative Tract
32400 located on the west side of Brea Canyon Road north
of Pathfinder Road.
Property Owner: City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, CA; and Arciero
and Sons, 950 North Tustin, Anaheim,
CA 92807
Applicant: Diamond Crest Estates, LLC, 27285
Las Rambles, Suite 230, Mission
Viejo, CA 92691
CDD/DeStefano read the staff report into the record. He
used visuals to point out the location of the proposed
project and the balance of the South Pointe Master Plan
area. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
adopt the resolution recommending City Council approval
of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203, subject to the
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed
within the resolution.
CDD/DeStefano responded to Chair/Goldenberg that the City
has received an offer to purchase an approximately 4 acre
portion of the 6.3 acre site from Arciero and Sons. The
City has proceeded, through regulatory process, to offer
the property for sale to other public agencies. The
acceptance of offers concluded today with no additional
offers received by the City. Based upon the conclusion
of the process, the City may proceed to sell the property
to anyone. Mr. Arciero is fulfilling his obligations
outlined within the previous Tract to seek purchase of
the 4 acres. The City will commence negotiations with
Mr. Arciero in the near future. The Planning Commission
may make a decision on this project based upon the stated
conditions that the applicant conclude acquisition with
an adjoining property owner, especially when the
adjoining property owner is a party to and cognizant of,
the issues involved. The Map will not exist unless the
sale transaction concludes.
C/Schad asked if a park is shown to be on the proposed
6.3 acres.
CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Schad that there is no park
as a component of the proposal. The applicant is
September 9, 1996 Page 3 Planning commission
required to provide park in lieu fees to the City. Park
in lieu fees for a 91 unit project amount to
approximately $120,000 and for a 16 unit project, the
fees amount to approximately $25,000. A 30 acre
active/passive park was proposed for the overall 90 acre
master plan. In addition, open space was proposed for
the area. Those projects dropped out for various
reasons. He stated that to his knowledge, there has
never been a park discussed for the 6.3 acre site.
Frank Arciero, Jr. , Arciero and Sons, stated his firm has
developed residential property in the Diamond Bar area
for approximately 20 years. He indicated the proposed
two product lines will include units of 3100 to 3400
square feet and 3400 to 3900 square feet. The
architecture is proposed to be Mediterranean. The units
will be contained within a guarded community.
Chair/Goldenberg opened the public hearing.
Rial Flesher stated he has lived in his Larkstone Drive
property since 1984. Mr. Flesher indicated the South
Pointe Master Plan was started by the Walnut Valley
Unified School District prior to Diamond Bar
incorporation. He further stated he agrees with the
proposed project. He asked the Planning Commission to
require that the access road to South Pointe Middle
School be constructed wider than what has been proposed.
C/Fong asked Mr. Flesher if he feels the proposed project
should include a park. Mr. Flesher responded "no" and
that he did not want any additional traffic on his
street. He indicated that there is adequate accessible
park space available to the area. C/Fong asked Mr.
Flesher if he is in favor of the proposed 16 units. Mr.
Flesher responded that he is in favor of the proposed
project. The 6.3 acres is not usable as park land.
VC/Ruzicka reiterated Mr. Flesher's approval of the
proposed project with the widening of the access road.
Mr. Flesher responded to VC/Ruzicka that he suggests the
Planning Commission and City Council consider the impact
of a narrow access road on the proposed project and ask
the developer to open the street wider than what is
proposed. He indicated that regardless of whether the
road is widened, he wants the project to go forward.
Chair/Goldenberg closed the Public Hearing.
VC/Ruzicka stated this project is confusing to him. He
asked for further clarification of the proposed site.
CDD/DeStefano pointed out the proposed project using an
September 9, 1996 Page 4 Planning commission
aerial photo encompassing the South Pointe Master Plan
area.
CDD/DeStefano responded to VC/Ruzicka that the project
consists of two adjacent rectangular shaped lots. The
line between the lots represents the gated access area.
CDD/DeStefano responded that prior to building permit
issuance, final design will be coordinated between the
public safety providers. Upon conclusion of
construction, the Fire Department and the Sheriff's
Department will have access through the gates. Street
maintenance will be privately contracted through the
Homeowners Association.
C/Fong asked staff to comment on plans to incorporate a
park within the proposed development.
CDD/DeStefano responded that within the original South
Pointe Master Plan, there was a proposal for a 30 acre
public park and about 30 acres of open space. Those
proposals did not encompass the land presently under
consideration. They were separate properties south and
west of the proposed site. Three acres proposed for
Larkstone Park are currently under the tennis courts at
South Pointe Middle School. This issue is yet to be
resolved by the City and the Walnut Unified School
District. The City's General Plan discusses the
acquisition of three acres within the immediate area.
CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Fong that the completion of
South Pointe Middle School offers recreational
opportunities. In addition, Ronald Reagan Park,
Starshine, Walnut Elementary and others in the immediate
area serve the residential neighborhoods of the tract.
Therefore, a decision was made for the City to receive in
lieu fees as opposed to additional land. The fee can
only be used for improvements to existing park land or
purchase of new park land. The General Plan identifies
the 6.3 acre lots as Single Family Residential and not as
a potential future park.
C/Fong stated that in his opinion, a development of this
size should include a park or open space. He indicated
that he is concerned with the visual impact of the lot
arrangement. He asked if the development can be designed
to incorporate slopes, meandering pathways along the
adjacent streets, and greenbelt areas to break up the
back sides of the lots. He asked that the project
include contour grading to preserve the natural
topography as required in the City's Hillside Maintenance
Ordinance. He stated that he believes the City is in
dire need of parks. He reiterated that a development of
September 9, 1996 Page 5 Planning Commission
this size and quality deserves to have open space and
parks incorporated within the tract. He believes studies
should be conducted to see if open space and greenbelt
areas can be provided for the proposed project. In order
to answer Mr. Flesher's concerns regarding increased
traffic, the City should conduct a Traffic Study to
determine the impact of additional parks versus
additional residences.
C/Schad stated that perhaps a pocket park should be
considered for this project. He indicated that he had
hoped that an effort would be made to preserve the
natural stream and the big row of oaks along side of the
stream. He stated he has been fighting for 16 years to
preserve this area. He further stated he concurs with
C/Fong's concepts regarding contour grading. He
indicated the project's EIR is incomplete. He agrees
that the traffic in Mr. Flesher's neighborhood is
impossible. He stated he recently encountered two
engineers on his street who were considering a secondary
access road into the back of South Pointe Middle School.
He asked CDD/DeStefano if he had any knowledge of
consideration of a secondary access road from Shaded Wood
Road to the school.
CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Shad that he is unaware of
any plans to develop a road from Shaded Wood Road to the
school property.
C/Schad stated he objected to the building of South
Pointe Middle School in the present location.
Chair/Goldenberg asked C/Schad for his comments on
Condition D. 11. regarding the suitability of oak trees
for transplanting.
VC/Ruzicka concurred with Mr. Flesher regarding the
school traffic.
VC/Ruzicka made a motion to continue the item to the
September 23, 1996 Planning Commission meeting to allow
the Commissioners time to review the Final EIR addendum
and Resolution. The motion died for lack of a second.
C/Schad responded to Chair/Goldenberg that it is
difficult and expensive to replant oak trees. He stated
that he is not certain that transplanting the oak trees
from this project would be feasible, but he believes it
should be reviewed by two arborists. In addition, he
would like to see some of the plants relocated.
C/Fong stated he is not against the developer's right to
develop his property. He feels that the proposed
September 9, 1996 Page 6 Planning Commission
development could be improved. He recommended that the
developer work with staff to improve the quality of the
development.
Chair/Goldenberg reminded C/Fong that the Commission is
addressing only 6.3 acres.
C/Fong responded to Chair/Goldenberg that he is
suggesting reconsideration of the 6.3 acres. As
presented, he cannot approve the project.
CDD/DeStefano suggested to C/Fong that the Commission
first ask for additional comments from the applicant. If
the Planning Commission is uncomfortable with the project
presented, it may direct that the project be reviewed and
amended by staff. It would be helpful for staff to know
the details of what the Planning Commission would like to
have accomplished. The Commission may recommend to the
City Council that the project be denied or approved with
the recommended conditions or with other conditions that
may incorporate the Commission's concerns. If the
Commission feels it is appropriate to include a park
within the project, it may recommend that one dwelling
unit be removed for purposes of creating a pocket park.
Mr. Arciero stated that the 6.3 acres is essentially a
flat graded piece of property. The grading of the
property has been included in the approval of Tract
32400. He further stated that he believes a residential
subdivision is the best use of the property. The land
does not lend itself to commercial or park uses. The
applicant will pay in lieu fees to acquire park land in
a more suitable location. He indicated he feels the
proposed land layout is appropriate for the site.
Mr. Arciero responded to C/Schad that although the land
has not yet been graded, the grading of the land was
approved through Vesting Tentative Tract 32400.
Chair/ Goldenberg asked Mr. Arciero if he could revise his
grading plan to preserve some of the natural topography.
Mr. Arciero responded to Chair/Goldenberg that he cannot
revise the already approved grading plan because of the
access road tie-in. A revised grading plan is not
technically feasible.
C/Schad made a motion, seconded by VC/Ruzicka to continue
the item to September 23, 1996 in order to allow the
Commission time to review the EIR addendum and new
Resolution. The motion was approved with the following
Roll Call vote:
September 9, 1996 Page 7 Planning Commission
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
Schad, VC/Ruzicka,
Chair/Goldenberg
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
Fong
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
McManus
Chair/Goldenberg reopened the
Public Hearing and
continued the
item to September
23, 1996.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
Chair/Goldenberg asked CDD/DeStefano to address Mr. Clute's
concerns.
CDD/DeStefano stated that on Friday, September 6, at about 4:15
p.m., Mr. Clute informed staff that activity had occurred on the
school district property. Staff has determined that L.A.
Cellular's subcontractor improperly installed an electrical pole on
the property. L.A. Cellular attempted to install overhead
utilities to the repeater station which is in direct violation of
the CUP Conditions of Approval. Staff encountered school district
personnel at the site and learned that the school district would
prefer a different kind of tree than what has been planted. In
addition, the school district would like fence screening to
mitigate the storage shed view. Staff has determined that the
installation effort will have to be coordinated to insure that the
City's Conditions of Approval and the homeowners needs are met by
the applicant. L.A. Cellular will use a battery backup system in
lieu of a fuel powered backup system. Staff will require detailed
documentation regarding the proposed backup system.
Chair/ Goldenberg thanked staff for their efforts toward addressing
the situation. He thanked Mr. Clute for reporting the matter to
the City.
CDD/DeStefano responded to C/Schad that the trench is a result of
erosion. The trees in place were approved by the Planning
Commission. Staff will work with L.A. Cellular to improve the
appearance.
Responding to C/Fong, CDD/DeStefano indicated the power pole
installed on Friday will be removed tomorrow. The second pole was
previously installed as part of an earlier application. Staff is
reviewing the application to determine if the installation is
proper. Staff will update the Commission.
VC/Ruzicka recommended that staff write a letter to L.A. Cellular
outlining what has occurred since the onset of this project stating
that the City of Diamond Bar would like to have the project brought
to a successful conclusion in spite of what has previously
occurred. He asked that the Planning Commission, City Council and
Mr. Clute be copied.
September 9, 1996 Page 8 Planning commission
VC/Ruzicka asked if he should keep project maps and other inventory
items. CDD/DeStefano responded to VC/Ruzicka that he may maintain
an inventory of Planning Commission projects or return the
materials to the City for filing or recycling.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
CDD/DeStefano stated that upon conclusion of the City Council's
deliberation of its goals and objectives, the item will be
agendized for the Planning Commission.
CDD/DeStefano stated that he approved two projects under the
Administrative Development Review process: A 400 square foot
outdoor patio dining area for the Diamond Bar Grill in the Lucky
Shopping Center, and a cellular repeater device to be located on
the side of the existing Armstrong Nursery building on Golden
Springs Drive.
ADJOURNMENT:
At 8:48 p.m., there being no further business to come before the
Planning Commission, C/Schad moved, VC/Ruzicka seconded, to adjourn
the meeting to September 23, 1996. There being no objections,
Chair/Goldenberg adjourned the meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Community Development Director
Attest:
/s/ Michael Goldenberg
Michael Goldenberg
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 12, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Istik called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. at the South
Coast Air Quality Management District Hearing Room, 21865 East
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by C/Tamaya.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners: Chair/Istik, Vice Chair Leonard,
Commissioners Nice, Tamaya, and Virginkar
Staff: Director of Public Works George Wentz, Deputy
Director of Public Works David Liu; Assistant
Engineer Rose Manela; Administrative
Assistant Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings;
and Recording Secretary Carol Dennis
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A. Minutes of July 25, 1996. C/Nice made a motion,
seconded by C/Tamaya, to approve the minutes of
July 25, 1996 as presented. The motion was
approved 4-0-1 with C/Virginkar abstaining.
B. Minutes of August 1, 1996. C/Tamaya made a
motion, seconded by VC/Leonard, to approve the
minutes of August 1, 1996 as presented. Without
objections, the motion was so ordered.
C. Minutes of August 8, 1996. C/Virginkar made a
motion, seconded by C/Nice to approve the minutes
of August 8, 1996 as presented. The motion was
approved 4-0-1 with C/Tamaya abstaining.
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Oscar Law, 21511 Pathfinder Road, asked for curbs and
sidewalks on Brea Canyon Road and for diagonal parking
on Brea Canyon Road in front of Heritage Park.
September 12, 1996 Page 2 T&T Commission
DDPW/Liu responded to Chair/Istik that Brea Canyon Road
design discussion is scheduled for the October 10, 1996
Traffic and Transportation Commission agenda.
Responding to Mr. Law, DPW Wentz stated that Traffic
and Transportation Commission recommendations regarding
Brea Canyon Road vehicle parking changes would be
forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Brea
Canyon Road design is scheduled for Fiscal Year 1996-
1997.
Grace MacBride, 435 Willapa Lane, asked how many other
residential areas in the City, in addition to her
street, have double yellow center lines.
Chair/Istik responded to Ms. MacBride that the Standard
of Practice for installation of centerline striping for
residential streets in the City is a scheduled agenda
item for this meeting.
Ms. MacBride stated she feels centerline striping ruins
the ambiance of the neighborhood. She indicated
several of her neighbors have complained about the
striping. She further stated she is opposed to
centerline striping on Sunset Crossing Road.
Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Drive, stated he is in
favor of centerline striping under the SR 60 at Sunset
Crossing Road.
Clyde Hennessy, 22702 Sunset Crossing Road, stated his
concerns about the speeding vehicles on Sunset Crossing
Road and asked for striping, reduction in speed, stop
signs and proper signage to indicate truck weight
limits and that the street dead ends.
Chair/Istik responded to Mr. Hennessy that cul-de-
sacing of Sunset Crossing Road is planned. In
addition, a discussion to narrow the street and conduct
a speed survey is pending.
Mr. Hennessy asked the City to bypass the speed survey
and immediately reduce the speed limit on Sunset
Crossing Road.
DPW/Wentz responded to Chair/Istik that the Sunset
Crossing Road discussion is scheduled for the October
September 12, 1996 Page 3 T&T commission
10, 1996 Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting.
Joe Larutta, 2546 Sunbright Drive, stated that eight
out of ten vehicles do not acknowledge the stop sign on
Sunbright Drive at Fountain Springs Road.
Phillip Kuida, 22635 Dry Creek Road, asked why the
freeway vehicles have right-of-way over the vehicles on
City streets exiting the SR 60 westbound offramp at
Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Chair/Istik referred Mr. Kyle to CalTrans which has
jurisdiction over freeway exit traffic flow.
Ron Collosi, 109 N. Prospectors Road, stated that many
vehicles disregard the three stop signs on his street
between Sunset Crossing Road and Golden Springs Drive.
He asked that the City reconsider installation of speed
bumps.
Debbie O'Connor, 23725 Bower Cascade Place, stated that
yesterday she observed a semi -truck with two trailers
made an illegal U-turn in the intersection of Sunset
Crossing Road and Del Sol Lane with school children
present on all four street corners. Today, she
observed three cars make U-turns at the same corner
just prior to school hours. She reiterated the need
for law enforcement at local school sites. She
requested the City contact the construction company and
advise them of the safety concerns.
Shanna Garno, 440 N. Del Sol Lane, stated she is very
concerned about the safety of the children in the area
of Del Sol Lane and Sunset Crossing Road. She
suggested a traffic signal in lieu of the stop sign at
the intersection.
Bob Zerbes, 2141 Tierra Loma Drive, stated he feels the
Northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard left turn signal
illumination at Pathfinder Road is inconsistent and
confusing, and presents a safety hazard.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. overnight parking of recreational/commercial
vehicles on City of Diamond Bar public streets.
September 12, 1996 Page 4 TAT Commission
DDPW/Liu read the staff report into the record. Staff
recommends that the Traffic and Transportation
Commission receive public testimony, discuss, and
forward a recommendation to the City Council.
Chair/Istik asked for public testimony.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Road, requested that
all of his comments be submitted to the City Clerk
verbatim. He referred the Commission to the City's
Municipal Code and the California Motor Vehicle Code
books. He stated he is angry to have to appear before
the Commission once again regarding an item that has
been previously tabled. He indicated staff's report is
incorrect when it states that at the October, 1991
meeting, several Diamond Bar residents opposed
overnight parking. He further stated that at the first
meeting in 1991, there were 300 people in attendance at
the County of Los Angeles Library. In addition, he
submitted a petition with 300 signatures and does not
understand how staff considers this number to be a few
people. He indicated the Page 2 staff statement that
the interim City Attorney inadvertently omitted the
County's 1130 minute parking between the hours of 2:00
a.m. and 4:00 a.m. from the ordinance is incorrect. He
referred the Commission to the meeting tape which
clearly states the motion is not to enforce the 2:00
a.m. to 4:00 a.m. restriction.
Mr. Rumpilla, referring to sections of the Vehicle
Code, asked for enforcement of the current laws
regarding recreational and commercial vehicle parking.
He stated that in his opinion, no additional laws are
needed.
Mr. Rumpilla asked that his letter and letters in
opposition to restrictions on overnight parking from
the following citizens be filed with the City Clerk:
Tom Ortiz, Tom Van Winkle, Alexandria French, Jeff and
Deena Ryan, Deanna Hoy, and Mike Goldenberg. These
letters are available for review at City Hall.
Chair/Istik observed that approximately 28 people in
the audience indicated by show of hands that in
principle, they agree with Mr. Rumpilla's position on
overnight parking of recreational and commercial
vehicles.
September 12, 1996 Page 5 T&T commission
Debbie O'Connor stated that if the City stripes
residential streets, recreational vehicles should not
be permitted to park on streets for safety reasons.
Owners moving their vehicles a short distance to
eradicate the enforcement markings does not solve the
problem. Vehicles should be moved away from the
problem area.
Don Gravdahl stated that in two previous instances, the
Traffic and Transportation Commission voted to table
the overnight parking on City streets item and
recommendations were forwarded to the City Council. He
acknowledged that citizens are breaking the laws that
are on the books. He suggested that 90 percent of the
street parking problems could be remedied by
enforcement of the current laws. He asked the
Commission to recommend enforcement of the existing
laws to the City Council.
Oscar Law stated he participated in writing the City's
Property Maintenance Ordinance. He does not want the
City to stop citizens from earning a living by taking
away their ability to park their commercial vehicle on
the City street at night.
Barbara Clannon, 3543 Falcon Ridge Road, agrees the
Vehicle Code should be enforced as written. People
have a right to make a living. However, some
neighborhood CC&R's restrict commercial vehicle parking
on City streets.
Joe Larutta stated that in his opinion, some City
streets lend themselves to street parking and some
streets do not. He asked that the City enforce the
current laws and CC&R's.
Ron Collosi indicated his wife parks a commercial
mobile dentistry vehicle on the street in front of
their house at night and on the weekends. It is
necessary that the vehicle be placed on leveling jacks
when parked. He stated he spoke with his neighbors to
determine if they had a problem with the arrangement.
He further stated that they have attempted to locate a
commercial parking space. However, there is no public
storage facility that can accommodate the necessary
hours of use. The vehicle cannot be parked in the City
of Walnut business lot at night because there is no
September 12, 1996 Page 6 T&T Commission
security.
Greg Cullen, 1118 Moonlight Summit Drive, stated he
attended the 1991 meeting held at the City Library. He
believes that the City Council tabled the item because
it had received only three letters of complaint
regarding recreational vehicles parked on City streets.
He recalls that approximately ninety-nine percent of
the people present at the 1991 meeting favored the
current regulations. He indicated he believes he has a
right to park his vehicles on City streets. He would
prefer the City focus on maintaining clean streets
instead of trying to keep the recreational vehicles off
of the streets at night.
Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Drive, asked the Traffic
and Transportation Commission to table the overnight
parking issue and recommend to the City Council that
the City enforce the current laws.
Clyde Hennessy, 22702 Sunset Crossing Road, concurred
with Frank Dursa and Oscar Law that there should be no
ban on overnight parking on City streets.
Royal Wilkes, 2702 George Lane, stated the City does
not need more laws - just enforce what's on the books.
Lydia Plunk, 1522 Deerfoot Drive, asked the Commission
to consider recommending creation of an educational
booklet for the citizens and the Sheriff's Department.
Don Fisher, 465 Bregante Drive, favors enforcement of
the existing laws. He indicated that although he owns
a 27 foot commercial truck and a 48 foot travel
trailer, he refuses to park them on the street out of
respect for his neighbors. He pays for vehicle storage
at a public facility. He stated that he believes a
street parked recreational vehicle is against the
letter of the law. A City street is a public right-of-
way, not a private area.
Shanna Garno stated she believes that the law
enforcement agencies have enough to do handling crime.
She wants to continue parking her recreational vehicle
on the street in front of her home.
Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Road, supports
September 12, 1996 Page 7 T&T Commission
RECESS:
safer, cleaner, calmer neighborhood streets. Parked
cars, trucks and recreational vehicles are the
neighborhood traffic chokers. He indicated he favors a
person's right to park their vehicles on their property
as long as it is within the Property Maintenance
Ordinance limitations. If the City revises overnight
parking, it needs to revisit the Property Maintenance
Ordinance. He further indicated he favors using the
current laws to mitigate safety concerns when
recreational vehicles are connected to household
wiring.
Chair/Istik recessed the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
RECONVENE: Chair/Istik reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to C/Tamaya that the Sheriff's
Department currently enforces "No Overnight Parking"
Ordinances for the cities of San Dimas and Walnut.
Deputies issue citations to offenders during the
appropriate hours of the morning. San Dimas previously
employed a Parking Patrol Officer to enforce the
Overnight Parking Ordinance. He indicated the deputies
routinely rotate enforcement in different area of the
cities. Diamond Bar is approximately the size of San
Dimas and Walnut combined. Diamond Bar citizens are
used to parking on the City's streets overnight. If a
ban is invoked, additional enforcement will be required
at the onset. If the Sheriff's Department receives a
call regarding a potential parking violation, a unit is
dispatched to the location. The offending vehicle's
tires will be marked and tagged. If the vehicle is
still in the same location at the end of the 72 hour
period, it will be stored. The ordinance works for
abandoned vehicles. It does not work well to prevent
people from storing their vehicles on the street. He
estimated that the Sheriff's Department responds to
approximately six to twelve parking violation calls per
month.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to C/Nice that the Sheriff's
Department responds to violations that occur on
residential street.
Responding to VC/Leonard, DDPW/Liu stated that
applicable provisions of Title 10 of the Municipal Code
are included in the Commission packets.
September 12, 1996 Page 8 T&T Commission
Chair/Istik stated he believes discussion is valuable.
He cited a Walnut Times article and indicated that some
cities have gone so far as to disallow recreational
storage in driveways. In 1970 the City of Walnut
modified its home building policies to allow 12 foot
side yard setbacks to accommodate recreational vehicle
storage. He further stated that this item is being
discussed as a result of concern regarding use of
residential streets for long term recreational and
commercial vehicle storage. He indicated that parking
such vehicles on city streets poses a potential sight
distance safety problem.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to Chair/Istik that an in place
Ordinance prohibits the parking of vehicles in excess
of six feet in height within 100 feet of an
intersection. The Ordinance cannot be enforced without
proper signage.
DDPW/Liu referred the Commission to Section 10.16.490
of the City Code.
VC/Leonard stated she is concerned about sight distance
and vehicles crossing over yellow center lines to avoid
recreational vehicles. She further stated that she is
particularly concerned about safety. She indicated she
is opposed to using public streets for vehicle storage.
She appreciates both sides of the issue. However, she
recommends the City focus on the safety of its
residents. In addition, she stated her concerns about
parked vehicles causing a blight upon the City.
C/Nice stated that in his opinion, adequate provisions
exist to remedy 90 percent or more of the current
street parking of recreational and commercial vehicles.
He further stated that he sees no reason for another
layer of bureaucracy. Enforcement is the issue.
C/Nice made a motion, seconded by C/Tamaya, to table
the issue of overnight parking of recreational/
commercial vehicles on City of Diamond Bar public
streets and inform the City Council that enforcement is
the issue and that no new ordinances are necessary.
Chair/Istik stated he is in favor of enforcing the
existing codes and monitoring the enforcement for six
months to one year to see if the enforcement is
September 12, 1996 Page 9 T&T commission
effective.
C/Nice restate his belief that no matter how many laws
are on the books, enforcement is the primary concern.
Chair/Istik stated he believes that enforcement will
mitigate a good portion of the citizen's concerns.
C/Nice stated he does not believe that recreational
vehicle parking on the City's streets compares to
enforcement concerns related to vehicles failing to
stop at stop signs. In his opinion, there are a few
Diamond Bar citizens who abuse the recreational
/commercial vehicle parking laws and these offenders
can be dealt with individually. He would prefer to see
law enforcement concentrate on the moving traffic
violations.
Sgt. Rawlings explained to Chair/Istik that most of the
enforcement items discussed at this meeting are being
addressed by the Sheriff's Department. With respect to
the 72 hour parking rule, he indicated he does not
believe Diamond Bar expects the Sheriff's Department to
mark and red tag every vehicle on the street. However,
the Sheriff's Department responds when called. He
stated that in his opinion, if the 72 hour law is
enforced, there will be no difference in the amount of
vehicles on the street. Citizens will be angry because
vehicles they use on a regular basis have been marked
and red tagged.
C/Tamaya suggested that if the law is not currently
being enforced, it would be difficult for the City to
enforce any new laws. He would like to see the current
laws enforced. He stated that in his opinion, citizens
should exercise their responsibility to call the
Sheriff's Department when they observe a violation.
C/Nice recommended the City initiate educational
programs to advise citizens regarding the law and
options for resolving conflicts.
VC/Leonard concurred with C/Nice regarding education of
the public regarding the existing laws. She reiterated
her safety concerns.
C/Virginkar stated he does not believe safety is an
September 12, 1996 Page 10 T&T Commission
issue with respect to overnight parking of recreational
vehicles. If recreational or commercial vehicles are
improperly parked, it is an ongoing issue. He further
stated that in his opinion, the only issue is
enforcement. He indicated that about 50 percent of the
concerns brought to the Traffic and Transportation
Commission deal with enforcement and favors
recommending increased enforcement of existing laws to
the City Council.
VC/Leonard pointed out that the City has received
letters from three citizens favoring enforcement of a
ban on overnight parking.
C/Nice called for the question. He reiterated his
motion to table the matter of overnight parking of
recreational/commercial vehicles on City of Diamond Bar
public streets and to recommend to the City Council
that they instruct law enforcement to strictly enforce
the existing laws. The motion was approved with the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Nice, Tamaya, Virginkar
VC/Leonard, Chair/Istik
None
None
Chair/Istik stated his no vote is because he believes
the matter should not be passed on to the City Council.
Greg Cullen asked for clarification of the vote.
VC/Leonard stated her no vote is because she is
concerned about the 72 hour law and that some citizens
use public streets for recreational and commercial
vehicle storage. She indicated she favors enforcement
of the existing laws.
Don Fisher recommended the City employ a Community
Service Officer to enforce the Parking Ordinance.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to Mr. Fisher that criminal
enforcement has priority over 72 hour parking. The
Sheriff's Department responds to calls on a priority
basis.
Al Rumpilla asked that the motion be reiterated.
September 12, 1996 Page 11 T&T Commission
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Request to red curb the entrance/exit driveway of
the Diamond Bar Post Office at Montef ino Avenue.
C/Tamaya made a motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to
forward a recommendation to the City Council to
red curb the north side of Montefino Avenue
between the post office's general public driveway
and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from
curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only"
driveway, and 15 feet westerly from the curb
return of the post office's general public
driveway. Without objections, the motion was so
ordered.
VI. NEW BUSINESS - Continued to October 10, 1996.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS - None
I%. ITEMS FROM STAFF:
A. Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update: Sgt. Rawlings
presented the Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update
for August, 1996. The August Enforcement Index
was 36.9.
S. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
BI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Traffic and Transportation Commission, C/Nice made a
motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to adjourn the meeting.
Chair/Istik adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. to
October 10, 1996.
Respectfully,
David G. Liu
Attest: Secretary
Jack Istik
Chair
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
BOARD HEARING ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D.
21865 Copley Drive
AUGUST 22, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by VC/Finnerty.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Tye, Vice -Chairperson Finnerty, Commissioners Law,
O'Connor
Absent: Commissioner Medina
Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose,
Community Services Supervisor Wendy Bowman, Parks and
Maintenance Superintendent Don Hensley
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE:
Julie Ream and Scott Scheffler, Day Camp staff, invited the Commissioners to attend their Ice
Cream Social on August 23, 1996 at 1:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park. Ms. Ream stated that
the Day Camp program runs for 10 weeks during the Summer. The program's primary
concern is service to the participants and their parents. Scott Scheffler explained how his
experience as a Day Camp attendee assisted him in becoming a staff worker.
CSD/Rose thanked Ms. Ream for her great job of setting -up and operating the Summer Day
Camp program.
NEW BUSINESS:
4. Storage Container Donation for Summitridge Park.
CSD/Rose stated that the Diamond Bar Girls Softball organization has offered
August 22, 1996 Page 2 Parks & Recreation Commission
to donate a storage container to the City for placement at Summitridge Park.
The container will be used by the Diamond Bar Girl's Softball program during
their season and will be available to other users during the off-season.
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission accept the
donation of a storage container from Diamond Bar Girls Softball to be placed
at Summitridge Park.
Sharron Shepard, President, Diamond Bar Girls Softball, proposed three
locations for the storage container. She recommended option #1 and asked for
the Parks and Recreation Commission to accept the donation by the Diamond
Bar Girls Softball team. She asked that they be allowed full use of the container
during the softball season. She indicated that during off-season months, the
container would be available for city or other organizations' use.
Ms. Shepard responded to GLaw that multiple keys are difficult for the
organization because the managers often volunteer for more than one
organization and would, therefore, have access to the equipment. Use of the
equipment by other organizations is not beneficial to the Girls Softball League.
The keys are controlled by the scorekeepers who are present during games.
Responding to C/O'Connor, Ms. Shepard indicated the proposed container is
smaller than the container at Peterson Park.
GLaw made a motion, seconded by VC/Finnerty to recommend acceptance of
the donation of a storage container from Diamond Bar Girls Softball to be
placed in accordance with Option #1 at Summitridge Park. The motion was
carried 4-0.
5. Request to Install Temporary Batting Cages at Peterson Park.
CSD/Rose stated that the Diamond Bar Girls Softball organization has
submitted a request to install temporary batting cages at Peterson Park for their
use during the girls softball season. It is understood that Diamond Bar Girls
Softball will pay all costs associated with the batting cages.
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission receive and
comment upon the concept of temporary batting cages at Peterson Park and
request further action as deemed appropriate by the Commission.
August 22, 1996 Page 3 Parks & Recreation Commission
John Foy, 1st Vice President, Diamond Bar Girls Softball, presented conceptual
plans for construction of portable batting cages at Peterson Park. He stated that
in addition to the donated portable batting cages, the Diamond Bar Girls
Softball organization will donate a 26 foot long by six foot wide cement
walkway between the batting cages so that the public has access to all areas of
the park. He indicated that the organization's primary concerns are safety and
the preservation of the park landscape. Because there are no cages in the
immediate area, the girls are shuttled to Chino Hills or other area facilities for
batting practice.
In response to C/Law, Mr. Foy stated that the pitching machine will be located
inside the batting cage and locked in the storage shed when not in use.
CSD/Rose responded to VC/Finnerty that batting cage installations would not
interfere with the use permit area of the park. The sleeve design would not
create a safety hazard because they are outside the play area.
Mr. Foy volunteered that the organization would provide sleeve caps to
mitigate safety concerns.
CSD/Rose stated that the batting cage plans need to consider the future light
pole installation.
Responding to CJO'Connor, Mr. Foy indicated sprinkler heads will be the only
item moved. No trees will be cut down or relocated. The organization
proposes to leave the grass as is inside the batting cages or cover it with red
clay. The batting cages may be used for little league practice. However, the
big league teams will be excluded from using the batting cages because of the
design.
C/O'Connor asked what signage will be provided to advise the public of the
intended uses. Mr. Foy responded that he will discuss the matter with the
softball board of directors.
C/O'Connor asked about injury liability. Mr. Foy responded that the softball
organization is responsible and provides liability insurance. Use of the batting
cages will be restricted and supervised. When not in use, the cages will be
locked.
CSD/Rose responded to C/O'Connor that the City's Building and Safety
August 22, 1996 Page 4 Parks & Recreation Commission
Department will approve the final structural plans. Risk Management will
assess the liability risk. It is expected that the batting cages would afford no
greater liability risk than the existing ballfield back stops.
VC/Finnerty stated in her opinion, the batting cages will present an attractive
nuisance to children.
Chair/Tye stated his concerns about the proposed netting cover. Mr. Foy
responded that the alternative is to install permanent chain link on top of the
batting cages.
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that if the organization should fail to remove
the batting cages at the end of the season, the City would use deposited funds
to hire labor to remove the cages. The deposit will be based upon estimated
costs for dismantling the cages.
Mr. Foy responded to C/O'Connor that the organization's field maintenance
manager is in charge of batting cage maintenance.
CSD/Rose recounted to C/O'Connor the process for approving the project.
Mr. Foy responded to C/O'Connor that Diamond Bar Girls Softball organization
hopes to have the project approved and the installation completed by the end
of January, 1997.
C/O'Connor asked where the portable units will be stored during the off-
season. Mr. Foy responded that the league storage unit will most likely be
utilized for storage of the batting cages.
VC/Finnerty made a motion, seconded by C/Law, to continue the item to
September 26 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting for additional
information and response to the Commissioner's questions and that an Ad Hoc
committee be appointed to accompany the applicant to the proposed site and
report its findings to the Commission. The motion was approved 4-0.
Chair/Tye appointed VC/Finnerty and C/Law to serve on the Ad Hoc committee
and report their observations to the Parks and Recreation Commission on
September 26, 1996.
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that staff will coordinate the scheduling of
August 22, 1996 Page 5 Parks & Recreation
the meeting.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS:
September 1
- Fall Recreation Brochure delivered to public
September 26
- Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
7:00 p.m., A.Q.M.D. Board Hearing Room
September 28
- Gondola Getaway in Long Beach (Adults) $40/person
September 29
- Los Angeles Dodger Baseball Game (Seniors) $10/person
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Approval of Minutes of July 25, 1996 Regular Meeting
C/Law made a motion, seconded by C/O'Connor to approve the minutes as
submitted. The motion was approved 3-0-1 with VC/Finnerty abstaining.
OLD BUSINESS:
2. Parks Master Plan.
CSD/Rose reported that the RFP to obtain a consultant to complete the Parks
Master Plan has been released. The deadline for submittal of proposals is
Thursday, August 29. After receipt of the proposals the selection team will
review the proposals, conduct interviews with the most qualified firms and
recommend to the City Council the consultant deemed best for this project.
Staff anticipates that the recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council
for its September 17 or October 1 meeting in order to prepare for the October
12 Scoping Session. Staff recommends that the Commission determine two
Commissioners to serve on the interview panel to recommend a consultant to
complete the Parks Master Plan.
Chair/Tye volunteered himself and C/O'Connor to serve on the Ad Hoc
committee to review the proposals and interview the prospective consultants.
In the event that either Chair/Tye of C/O'Connor are unavailable for either
phase of the committee process, alternate Commissioners will be called to
serve in their place.
August 22, 1996 Page 6 Parks & Recreation
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that four RFP's were mailed to the City's
short list and the job was advertised in the consultant's newsletter. As a result,
the City forwarded a total of 21 RFPs. Staff is still receiving calls from
consultants regarding the RFP.
3. Parks Maintenance Update.
CSD/Rose stated that over the past summer, the Commissioners and staff have
reviewed existing conditions at the City's parks. He referred the
Commissioners to the list of items determined to require attention.
PMS/Hensley stated that most of the maintenance and cleanup items listed have
been completed.
CSD/Rose responded to VC/Finnerty that the ropes hanging over the creek in
Sycamore have been removed on more than one occasion. Accurate
Landscape has presented staff with a proposal for weekly cleanup. California
Conservation Corp has offered to do a one-time cleanup, and Graffiti Control
Systems has presented a proposal for one-time removal of graffiti. Staff is
currently evaluating the proposals. The item may be referred to the City
Council for appropriation.
C/Law suggested that a color other than red be used on the playground
equipment at Starshine Park because red fades too quickly. PMS/Hensley
responded he will research the matter and report back to the Commission.
CSD/Rose responded to C/Law that all City parks meet or exceed the California
State requirement for handicapped parking.
C/Law stated that he is working with Congressman Jay Kim's office to reduce
the parking ratio from 1 per 29 to 1 per 19.
Responding to Chair/Tye, CSD/Rose stated approximately 10 percent of the
City's population is 55 years of age and over.
Chair/Tye responded to C/Law that he is excluded from Handicapped parking
spaces. However, handicapped persons can park anywhere. He is concerned
that increasing the ratio of handicapped parking will infringe on needed
general parking spaces.
August 22, 1996 Page 7 Parks & Recreation
PMS/Hensley explained that the Sycamore Canyon Park field remained wet for
the final concert in the park because the drainage system reached its maximum
and would not allow for proper runoff. Sunday night is the last night the
sprinkler system runs until after the Wednesday concert night.
CSD/Rose responded to VC/Finnerty that the sand channel drainage system
estimate for the Peterson Park soccer field is $36,000.
Responding to C/O'Connor, CSD/Rose stated the Sycamore Canyon Creek
water analysis has been completed. The City is awaiting the report.
In response to C/Law, CSD/Rose explained the drainage filter will be designed
and constructed during this year's Claremont College Master's program.
Chair/Tye commended the Parks and Recreation staff for their work.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
6. User Group Field Allocation Schedule.
CSD/Rose referred the Commissioner's to the August 1 through December 31,
1996 athletic facility use schedule. Permits have been mailed to all of the
participant programs. He pointed out that the only athletic facility that has not
been reserved is Paul C. Grow Park on Sundays.
Chair/Tye complimented staff on the matrix.
7. 8th Anniversary Celebration.
C/O'Connor reported that the Ad Hoc Committee is considering a 50's theme
for the 8th Anniversary Celebration which would include a car show. Local
schools are being asked to participate and support the celebration. The date
recommended to the City Council is April 20, 1997. The Committee is
considering asking the sports organizations to conduct their registration, having
businesses sponsor the celebration, hanging street banners and other methods
to get the whole community involved in this event.
VC/Finnerty stated she likes the car show suggestion and recommended that
Diamond Bar citizens be contacted for participation prior to engaging an
August 22, 1996 Page 8 Parks & Recreation
organization. She concurred that street banners would be very helpful and
would encourage community participation.
C/O'Connor continued that sponsor money may be used to provide banners,
portable stages, easy -up canopies, storage bins, pennant streamers, balloons
(balloon arches).
CSD/Rose stated the 50's theme ties to the issuance of the initial Diamond Bar
grading permits which were issued to Transamerica in the 1950's.
Chair/Tye recommended a specific day be set aside for the Diamond Bar
annual celebration such as the third Sunday of April.
C/O'Connor further stated the committee is pursuing purchase of items which
can be used for several years to come. The committee meets every two weeks.
C/O'Connor responded to VC/Finnerty that the committee is discussing sponsor
contributions of $100, $500, $1,000 and $2,000 to advertise and to hang a
banner. In addition, sponsors would be allowed to sell their wares.
In response to C/Law, C/O'Connor stated there will be shuttle service offered
from Diamond Point Elementary School and from Golden Springs Drive.
8. Recreation Update.
CSS/Bowman presented the following update:
ADULT SPORTS
CSS/Bowman stated staff has been struggling with the Sunday Adult softball and
basketball leagues. The City may be able to offer evening leagues with the
installation of lighting at Peterson Park. Adult softball ended with tournament
play on August 11. Basketball ended August 18. The winning teams were
awarded championship t -shirts and team trophies. Flyers for the next softball
season, which starts August 25 were distributed to Cal Poly Pomona, Mt. Sac,
Vons, Ralphs, Lucky Markets, Alpha Beta, Rudy's Pizza and Barro's Pizza,
AQMD, and Diamond Bar City Hall. Newspaper releases were sent to the Los
Angeles Times, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, The Highlander, The Windmill
and Jones Intercable. Releases will be resubmitted every two weeks. On July
August 22, 1996 Page 9 Parks & Recreation
23 a direct mailing was sent to individuals who have participated in the past or
have expressed interest in the next leagues.
CONTRACT CLASSES
The summer session is coming to an end and the fall newsletter is due out the
end of August. The 1996-97 contract goal is to generate $130,000 in revenue.
To date, $33,904 has been generated with 982 participants enrolling in classes.
Staff is looking forward to moving to the new office location which will afford
the City the opportunity to utilize two available classrooms.
The City is recruiting for a Contract Class Specialist and an Athletics Specialist
to fill two recently vacated positions.
YOUTH BASEBALL
The youth baseball season came to a close on August 23. Pictures and
trophies have been delivered to all the teams and customer care evaluation
forms have been handed out to all league participants. A total of 430
participants signed up to play in the program, generating $23,650 in revenue.
Projected revenue for the program was $25,740 with 468 players participating.
Youth baseball did not reach this goal.
DAY CAMP
Day camp enrollment is excellent. The interesting programs have included
"Many Faces, Many Nations" day with 10 Koreans participating. To date, 365
campers have enrolled and 76 additional participants signed up for the weekly
major excursions, generating a total of $32,335 in revenue.
CSS/Bowman responded to Chair/Tye that she is optimistic about adult softball and
basketball. She would like to see the schedule moved from Sunday. CSD/Rose stated
other facilities would be required to form a league on other days.
VC/Finnerty suggested that a different day be offered when Pantera Park is completed.
CSS/Bowman indicated she would like to form a corporate league. However, facilities
are required.
August 22, 1996 Page 10 Parks & Recreation
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
C/O'Connor asked for an update on the lights at Lorbeer Middle School. CSD/Rose
responded the City is working on a joint agreement with Pomona Unified School District.
The school district wants to maintain control of the school facilities. Diamond Bar wants
priority for its residents. The next meeting is scheduled after Labor Day.
C/O'Connor reported that Diamond Bar AYSO now has 1,376 players on 127 teams. She
thanked staff for the Concerts in the Park series. She reported she attended the Brea
Community Center Grand Opening July 27. She referred the Commission to brochures which
outline the center's available facilities. She stated she attended the Walnut MRF celebration
on July 27. All Diamond Bar City Council members and two Traffic and Transportation
Commission members also attended.
C/O'Connor stated that on July 30 she went to the Heritage Park facility to see the senior
citizens and survey their parking situation. She indicated that several senior citizens attended
the fifth Tuesday free lunch. She stated that although the parking lot does not accommodate
all attendees, street parking is available. She further stated she did not arrive early enough
to determine if the senior citizens are carpooling.
VC/Finnerty stated she missed the July Parks and Recreation Commission meeting because
she was attending the soccer matches at the Olympic Games in Alabama and Georgia.
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that the Ranch Festival Committee has extended an
invitation to Sheila Cornell, Diamond Bar resident and U.S. Women's Softball gold medal
winner, to participate in their parade.
Chair/Tye thanked staff for the Concerts in the Park series. He suggested the series start a
week earlier next year because darkness falls too early on the last concert. He indicated he
is concerned that citizens are unaware of the Concerts in the Park. He reminded the
Commissioners that Mayor Ansari will address the Friends of the Library at the City Library
on September 19.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
CSD/Rose stated staff received 64 positive evaluations on the Concerts in the Park.
CSD/Rose demonstrated the paper bag receptacle which could be placed in the City's parks
for citizen's use in disposing of animal droppings.
August 22, 1996 Page 11 Parks & Recreation
ADJOURNMENT:
GLaw made a motion, seconded by VC/Finnerty to adjourn the meeting at 9:35 p.m. The
motion was carried 4-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Bob Rose
Bob Rose
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Steve Tye
Steve Tye
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
BOARD HEARING ROOM OF S.C.A.Q.M.D.
21665 Copley Drive
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:17 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by C/O'Connor.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Tye, Vice Chairman Finnerty, Commissioners Law, Medina,
O'Connor
Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose, and Community Services
Supervisor Wendy Bowman
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
11. Recreation Update.
CSS/Bowman presented the following update:
ADULT SPORTS
CSS/Bowman stated adult basketball league play began Sunday afternoon and
evenings on September 22. There are currently 10 paid teams participating in the
league. Six teams are registered for adult softball which began September 22. She
indicated the City is looking for indoor facilities for an adult volleyball league.
CONTRACT CLASSES
The Summer session of contract classes has been completed and registration for the
Fall session began on September 3. Several new classes have been added for the
September 26, 1996
Page 2 Parks & Recreation Commission
preschool age children including Fun With Your Toddler, Preschool Fun Club, and
Mommy and Me Dance. New classes for youth are Native American Indian Living,
Ecology Mysteries and Starlab, a portable planetarium designed to surround students
with the universe. Starlab is taught by staff from Discovery Science Center. Twenty
eight people have registered for the Ballroom Dance class. Popular returning classes
are Kindermusik, Youth and Adult Tennis, Karate, Computer Classes, and Children's
Drawing.
YOUTH BASEBALL
Youth baseball ended August 24. Program and customer care evaluations were given
to all participants. A hand out was distributed to the Commission that shows the
survey results.
DAY CAMP
Projected revenue for the 10 week camp, June 17 through August 23, was $35,600
with 400 campers registered. Summer revenue was $31,997 with 382 campers
attending. Revenue was projected at a 50-50 split for regular and extended day
schedules charging $79 and $99 respectively. In reviewing registration for this
summer, a more practical split would be 75% regular day and 25% extended day
which would reduce the projected revenue to a more realistic dollar amount. Seventy-
four public participants registered to attend the day camp excursions which generated
$1820 in revenue. Projected revenue was $1250 with 50 participants. Staff believes
the Day Camp program will continue to grow and a larger facility may be needed next
summer. The Commission was presented with a handout that shows the growth of the
Day Camp program from 1995 to 1996. Also, a copy of a letter to Brea Trophy
thanking them for their donation was provided to the Commission.
CSS/Bowman presented the customer care evaluation results. Suggestions were:
Ethnic diversity of counselors, financial aid for participants, earlier hours, sibling
discount, microwave, and a larger facility.
CSS/Bowman stated that the Recreation Services office will move to the Country Hills
Towne Center site on October 14.
CSS/Bowman responded to C/Law that the City will accept applications for Summer
Day Camp in March or April, 1997.
CSS/Bowman responded to VC/Finnerty that the new Recreation Services office will
September 26, 1996 Page 3 Parks & Recreation Commission
be located at 21345 Cold Spring Lane #B in the Country Hills Towne Center between
Ralphs and AAA.
C/Medina thanked CSS/Bowman for including the Ballroom Dancing in the contract
class program. He asked if the City could include nutritional classes or seminars.
CSS/Bowman responded to C/O'Connor that most coaches are respectful to umpires
and participants. If there is a problem, coaches are asked to speak with umpires one
on one.
Chair/Tye asked where staff is looking to obtain a volleyball facility. CSS/Bowman
replied that staff will research Diamond Bar High, Lorbeer Junior High, Chaparral and
South Pointe middle schools. About half of the teams indicated they will consider
Sunday play.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1.1 Approval of Minutes of August 22, 1996 Regular Meeting
VC/Finnerty made a motion, seconded by C/O'Connor to approve the minutes
as submitted. The motion was approved 4-0-1 with C/Medina abstaining.
1.2 Transmittal of Information
1.2.1 League of California Cities Conference
1.2.2 C.A.P.R.C.B.M. 1996 Southern California Workshop
1.2.3 Letter dated September 19, 1996 from Walnut Valley Unified
School District regarding spores in wrestling room at Diamond
Bar High School.
OLD BUSINESS:
2. Request to Install Temporary Batting Cages at Peterson Park.
CSD/Rose presented staff's report. He indicated the Commission's ad hoc
committee met with staff and a Girls Softball representative at Peterson Park on
Wednesday, September 18. He reviewed the three proposed options for
batting cage locations.
September 26, 1996 Page 4 Parks & Recreation Commission
C/Law stated his concern that batting cages, as a gift to the City, should be
available to all citizens.
VC/Finnerty responded to C/Law that temporary batting cages would be the
sole property of Diamond Bar Girls Softball. If the batting cages are
permanent, the City retains possession and the facility would be available for
public use.
CSD/Rose responded to C/Law that if the batting cages are removed, the post
holes will be covered.
VC/Finnerty suggested changing the park's master plan to move the basketball
court closer to the SR 60 to mitigate the noise potential at the condominium
complex across the street from the park.
CSD/Rose stated the City can run conduit to potential batting cage locations
when the park lighting is installed.
C/O'Connor asked if it would be prudent to wait for completion of the Parks
Master Plan to consider this item.
CSD/Rose responded to C/O'Connor that temporary batting cages would not
conflict with the Parks Master Plan.
C/O'Connor stated she favors temporary batting cages. She reiterated her
concern about postponing this item until the Parks Master Plan is completed.
John Foy, 1st Vice President, Diamond Bar Girls Softball, stated the original
proposal was for construction of portable batting cages at Peterson Park. He
indicated he favors permanent cages with chain link fencing material covering
the top and tennis court screening, manufactured concrete footings and red
brick dust at site option U. He indicated that he expects Diamond Bar Girls
Softball enrollment to increase dramatically next year. Last year 49 teams
participated in the Girls Softball program. He anticipates that with lighted
ballfields accommodating evening play, 55 or more teams will participate in
the 1997 season. Permanent batting cages would provide use to all in the
community.
Mr. Foy responded to Chair/Tye that if site option #3 is approved, teams will
be encouraged to use the batting cages. There is a 50-50 chance the cages will
September 26, 1996
Page 5 Parks & Recreation Commission
be used for warm-up pitching.
Responding to C/O'Connor, Mr. Foy indicated that it would be feasible to
require the batting cages be used for pre -game warm-up. There are
approximately 465 Girls Softball participants currently with an additional 125
girls anticipated to play next year. He expects 55 Diamond Bar teams will
participate in the June, 1997 tournament.
Responding to CSD/Rose, Mr. Foy stated that instead of brick dust, sod and
grass could be used in a temporary facility.
Mr. Foy responded to Chair/Tye that the prefabricated concrete footings sit on
top of the ground and can be moved. He anticipates the batting cage
installation will cost approximately $7,500.
Mr. Foy indicated that due to the cost involved, he would need to obtain the
Girls Softball organization's board of directors approval for temporary batting
cages.
Following discussion, the Commission agreed to support the concept of batting
cages at Peterson Park, and concurred that site option #3 is preferable and that
portable (not permanently installed) batting cages can be supported at this time.
The Commission continued the item to the October Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting for further consideration.
NEW BUSINESS:
4. Proposed Sunset Crossing Pocket -Park Conceptual Plan Presentation.
CSD/Rose stated that at its December 19, 1995 meeting, the City Council
awarded a contract to Charles Abbott Associates (C.A.A.) to design a conceptual
plan for a proposed pocket -park at the cul-de-sac of the western terminus of
Sunset Crossing Road.
CSD/Rose responded to VC/Finnerty that the City Council has the option to
postpone a decision on this item until the Parks Master Plan is completed.
Alan Fishman, Landscape Architect, presented three conceptual plans and cost
estimates for a proposed pocket -park at the cul-de-sac of the western terminus
of Sunset Crossing Road. The plans vary significantly in activity level and
September 26, 1996
Page 6 Parks & Recreation Commission
related development costs. All concepts involve demolishing the street and
replacing the 43 lost street parking spaces by converting the "Christmas Tree"
lot to a parking lot (42 spaces). All concepts maintain compatibility with the
existing and future YMCA facilities. Scheme #1 incorporates a competition
level rollerhockey rink, a skateboard park, 42 parking spaces in the Christmas
Tree lot and 14 additional potential parking spaces (current driveway and
undeveloped portion of the existing lot), Little League baseball field, restrooms
and concession stand. Scheme #1 construction costs are estimated to be
approximately $900,000 which includes a 10 percent contingency.
CSD/Rose responded to C/Law that the State Code outlines procedures to
reduce or eliminate the City's liability with respect to the skateboard facility.
The City would offer no supervision and posted signs would require
participants to wear helmets, pads, etc. As a result of State Code enactment,
Huntington Beach, for example, has received no liability claims for its
skateboard park.
Mr. Fishman referred to Scheme #2 which eliminates the skateboard facility
and reduces the construction cost to approximately $600,000. Scheme #3
proposes a Community Park which eliminates the skateboard and rollerhockey
facilities and includes a tot lot. Construction cost is estimated to be $450,000.
Mr. Fishman responded to VC/Finnerty that all three proposed plans are
relatively low maintenance concepts.
Responding to Chair/Tye, Mr. Fishman stated an epoxy resin can be applied to
the concrete in the park which allows graffiti (spray paint) to be washed away.
He indicated to VC/Finnerty that the application cost is relatively low and
would most likely be covered by the contingency.
Mr. Fishman responded to C/O'Connor that a tot lot could be included in
Scheme #2.
VC/Finnerty stated she favors Scheme #1 which incorporates facilities not
available in other City parks.
C/Law stated he favors Scheme #1 and asked how the City would fund the
facility. CSD/Rose responded that effective January 1, 1997, Proposition A
funds will be made available for a discretionary reallocation grant program for
which the City may submit proposals. CDGB cannot be used for this facility
September 26, 1996 Page 7 Parks & Recreation Commission
because it is an undeveloped area. Unallocated Quimby monies are available.
The City's General Fund reserve contains funds. If the new November ballot
Proposition A is passed, Diamond Bar will receive approximately $270,000.
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that the YMCA will donate land only for the
park.
VC/Finnerty moved,
approve Scheme #1
carried 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS - Continued
3. Parks Master Plan.
C/Law seconded, to recommend that the City Council
as presented, with the addition of a tot lot. The motion
CSD/Rose stated that at its September 17 meeting, the City Council awarded a
contract in the amount of $106,000 to Purkiss-Rose/RSI to complete the Parks
Master Plan for the City of Diamond Bar. The joint meeting with the City
Council and Parks and Recreation Commission will be held on Saturday,
November 2 at Heritage Park Community Center from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00
noon.
NEW BUSINESS - Continued
5. Citizen Complaint Regarding Ronald Reagan Park - The City received a written
letter of complaint regarding the operation of Ronald Reagan Park from a
resident who lives immediately adjacent to the park. The complaint is
generally with regard to 1) glare from lights, 2) noise from park activities and
maintenance operations. Staff is receiving bids for light shields to block the
glare from tennis and basketball court lights. In addition, staff is considering
mitigation measures for three additional items of concern. Other suggestions
involve policy issues that will affect the community's use of the park.
Following discussion, the Commission concurred that no ad hoc committee
should be established. Further, the Commission requested staff to write a letter
to the resident addressing the items of concern indicating the changes that have
been made, the changes that are in progress, and explain the items of concern
that would require changes in park use policies.
September 26, 1996 Page 8 Parks & Recreation Commission
6. Signage for Posting Rules in Parks.
CSD/Rose stated staff has received verbal requests from several residents the
past month asking that rules be posted in parks immediately adjacent to their
homes. The residents believe that this action would control park patrons.
CSD/Rose further stated he feels too many signs can detract from the ambiance
of the City's parks. He indicated that City Council approval may be required
for new rules that affect the public's use of City parks.
The Commission requested staff to review park signage and posting in general
and submit information to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review and
consideration at a future meeting.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - Continued
7. Maintenance of Natural Area of Sycamore Canyon Park.
CSD/Rose reported that the California Conservation Corps began maintenance
work on the natural area of Sycamore Canyon Park on Monday, September 23.
He outlined the Corps scope of.work. On October 1, City Council will
consider a contract amendment for Accurate Landscape and Maintenance to
complete weekly maintenance of the park's natural area at a monthly cost of
$193.50.
8. New Office for Recreation Staff.
CSD/Rose reiterated that the City's recreation staff will be moving to 21345
Cold Spring Lane #6, Country Hills Towne Center on October 14.
9. 8th Anniversary Celebration Update.
CSD/Rose reported the City's 50's theme 8th Anniversary celebration will be
held April 20, 1997. The next committee meeting is scheduled for October 10,
1996 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Hall Conference Room.
10. Concerts in the Park.
CSD/Rose presented the written results of the Concerts in the Park evaluation.
C/O'Connor recommended that with the exception of seeing eye dogs, no dogs
September 26, 1996 Page 9 Parks & Recreation Commission
be allowed in the park during Concerts in the Park.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
CSD/Rose responded to C/O'Connor that Commissioners are welcome to assist in staffing the
City's Ranch Festival booth. Contact Wendy Bowman for details.
C/Medina announced that eleven senior citizen's teams participated in a special bowling
event at Oak Tree Lanes. The bowling alley proprietors have scheduled a banquet for the
participants.
CSD/Rose responded to Chair/Tye that the City Council will discuss the matter of donations
and gifts to the City in general at its October 1 meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENTS - None
ADJOURNMENT:
VC/Finnerty made a motion, seconded by CJLaw to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 p.m. The
motion was carried 5-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Bob Rose
Bob Rose
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Steve Tye
Steve Tye
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMUNU 95AK
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0.
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 5,1996 REPORT DATE: October 30,1996
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Accounting Manager
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - September 30, 1996
SUMMARY:
Submitted for the City Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of September,
1996.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
_ Ordinance(s)
_ Agreement(s)
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's office)
_ Other:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
_ Yes
_ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
_ Yes
_ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? NIA
_ Yes
_ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? NIA
_ Yes
—No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? NIA
_ Yes
—No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Terrence L. Bela r
City Manager
Frank M. Usher
Assistant City Manager
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
Lin a G. Magnus"
Accounting Manager
Gil Y GOUNGIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: October 30, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - September 30, 1996
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City
Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the September, 1996 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for the Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of
September, 1996. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown
of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from
investments.
The City's Deferred Compensation balances which are managed by ICMA are also being reported.
The City receives ICMA statements on a quarterly basis. The balances reported are as of September
30,1996.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
September 30, 1996
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT
BEGINNING
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
1,738.51
TRANSFERS
ENDING
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT
9
RECEIP'T'S
DISBURSEMENT
IN (DUT) ...
BALANCE.
GENERAL FUND
$10,211,396.64
$639,140.04
$718,161.16
$101,582.19
$10,233,957.71
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND
106,276.75
342.77
105,933.98
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
10,505.88
(4,607.90)
5,897.98
GAS TAX FUND
2,611,072.69
(4,659.58)
2,606,413.11
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
1,557,878.79
18,071.90
53,475.20
1,522,475.49
TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD
1,638,646.24
(3,603.00)
1,635,043.24
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
98,051.44
3,348.95
10,173.44
91,226.95
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
125,638.42
2,708.87
122,929.55
PARK FEES FUND
316,306.79
(730.00)
315,576.79
S PARKS GRANT (PRP A) FD
0.00
(55,197.79)
(55,197.79)
COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD
12,582.90
31,332.00
3,568.34
(47,733.00)
(7,386.44)
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
144,041.03
4,372.73
139,668.30
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
20,814.36
6,782.63
14,031.73
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
209,880.74
6,878.39
203,002.35
GRAND AV CONST FUND
139,130.78
139,130.78
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
177,457.19
24,481.44
14,949.08
167,924.83
SB 821 FUND
26,264.22
26,264.22
SELF INSURANCE FUND
579,717.34
300.00
579,417.34
TOTALS
$17,985,662.20
$691,892.89
$831,244.97
$0.00
$17,846,310.12
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT
$249,863.01
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
1,738.51
CHANGE FUND
175.00
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT
500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS $252,276.52
TIME CERTIFICATES $0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 17,594,033.60
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 17,594,033.60
TOTAL CASH $17,846,310.12
Note: The City of Diamond Bar is invested in the State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund. All funds are available
for withdrawal within 24 hours. Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund is allowed under the City's formally
adopted investment policy.
L.A.I.F - Effective Yield for August, 1996 5.566%
(September Unavailable)
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
September 30, 1996
(page 2)
INVESTMENT: DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNT (AS OF 9130/96)
ICMA Retirement Corporation - 457 Plan:
AGGRESSIVE OPPORTUNITY FUND
6,402.12
INTERNATIONAL FUND
6,704.87
GROWTH STOCK FUND
78,898.56
BROAD MARKET FUND
23,828.01
EQUITY INCOME FUND
1,876.34
ASSET ALLOCATION FUND
22,797.04
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FUND
311.60
CORE BOND FUND
6,305.46
US TREASURY FUND
2,848.09
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
371.56
PLUS FUND
244,354.34
GUARANTEED FUND
11,812.87
TRADITIONAL GROWTH
9,017.41
MS CAPITAL APPRECIATION
2,217.60
MS GROWTH & INCOME
2,240.44
TOTAL OF DEPOSITS
419,986.31
Note: These investment options are at the discretion of the employees.
Due to the complexity of the funds, which are solely handled by ICMA, the City is only reporting the balances available in
in the various instruments
The reporting period reflects the most current quarter reported by ICMA to the City.
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS
$18,266,296.43
All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy.
The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's
estimated expenditures.
a
Terrence L. Belanger,
Treasurer
POOLED MONEY INVESTMENT ACCOUNT
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT DATA
A COMPARISON OF AUGUST 1996 WITH AUGUST 1995
(Dollars in Thousands)
AUGUST 1996 AUGUST 1995 CHANGE
Average Daily Portfolio
$28,156,866
$25,261,428
+$2,895,438
Accrued Earnings
$133.116
$126,448
+$6,668
Effective Yield
5.566
5.910
-.344
Average Life --Month End (in days)
258
300
-42
i otal Security Transactions
Amount
$15,881.,484
$24,323,070
- $8,441,586
Number
391
564
-173
Total Time Deposit Transactions
Amount
$343,200
$194,695
+$148,505
Number
26
21
+5
Average Workday Investment Activity
$737,486
$1,065,990
-$328,504
Prescribed Demand Account Balances
For Services
$126,379
$142,310
-$15,931
For Uncollected Funds
$157,925
$155,891
+$2,034
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND*
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY
AUGUST 1996
BEGINNING BALANCE DEPOSITS WITHDRAWALS MONTH END BALANCE
$10,265,236,388.49 $1,036,469,000.00 $1,104,153,781.40 $10,197,551,607.09
*Local Agency Investment Fund Invested Through Pooled Money Investment Account
State of California
Pooled Money Investment Account
Market Valuation
8/30196
-� °�'•�`""
Garry Goad R
Estimated
+• o*�i'lu .�'ia �,��� , we
i'rtot Value
Accrued Interest
United States Treasury:
Bills
$
2,401,069,042.99
$
2,456,987,050.00
NA
Strips
$
309,528,260.00
$
355,188,460.00
NA
Notes
$
5,293,796,886.41
$
5,205,262,305.00
$
43,211,187.67
Federal Agency:
Bonds
$
752,826,699.69
$
746,341,630.00
$
7,483,315.33
Floaters
$
454,928,512.73
$
455,539,450.00
$
9,218,833.65
MBS
$
164,017,728.68
$
156,701,917.97
$
968,371.24
TVA
$
29,924,691.38
$
29,982,343.70
$
719,008.92
GNMA
$
4,059,363.04
$
4,495,905.85
$
38,697.36
SBA
$
123,563,564.03
$
124,991,725.24
$
1,254,396.32
FHLMC PC
$
33,887,540.42
$
36,061,123.51
$
544,227.33
Discos it Notes
$
374,004,701.39
$
375,600,700.00
NA
Bankers Acceptances
$
298,198,295.85
$
298,548,179.37
NA
Corporate:
Bonds
$
1,447,220,484.03
$
1,436,401,986.17
$
30,195,183.53
Floaters
$
580,760,942.27
$
580,881,482.50
$
5,919,038.12
CDs
$
5,165,016,893.59
$
5,207,332,365.86
$
6,750,141.93
Bank Notes
$
960,106,971.27
$
973,164,154.60
$
1,937,452.78
Repurchase Agreements
$
200,000,000.00
$
200,000,000.00
NA
Time Deposits
$
340,995,000.00
$
340,995,000.00
NA
AB 55 & GF Loans
$
1,842,349,978.00
$
1,842,349,978.00
NA
Commercial Paper
$
6,807,889,686.07
$
6,817,305,229.42
NA
Reverse Repurchase
$
(405,500,000.00)
$
(405,500,000.00)
$
(1,524,833.33)
TOTAL $ 27,178,643,261.84 $ 27,238,630,987.18 $ 106,715,020.86
Estimated Market Value Including Accrued Interest $ 27,345,346,008.04
NOTE: Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and
Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost).
Certificates of Deposit (CDs), Bank Notes (BNs), and Commercial Paper (CPs) less
than 90 days are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). Interest accrued
from the date of purchase on CDs and BNs under 90 days is not included.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Councilmember Werner and Councilmember Herrera
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson Accounting Manager
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, November 5, 1996
DATE: October 31, 1996
Attached is the Voucher Register dated November 5, 1996. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
its entry on the Consent Calendar.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated November 5, 1996 have been
reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are
hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO.
FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
001
General Fund
$601,701.36
010
Library Services Fund
54.32
112
Prop A Fund -Transit
58,488.22
115
Integrated Waste Mgt Fund
342.15
118
Air Quality Fund
86.00
125
CDBG Fund
727.34
138
LLAD #38 Fund
4,984.42
139
LLAD #39 Fund
6,387.65
141
LLAD #41 Fund
2,984.08
250
C.I.P Fund
36,864.63
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$712,620.17
APPROVED BY:
Linda G. Magndson I t /ry
Accounting Manager Counc
� n
Terrence L. tlanger
City Manager
d' 4/v"'
Carol A. Herrera
Councilmember
DUE THF
L ...............
VENDOR NAME
VENDOIR ill,
a - ---
ACCO NT P'ROJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH F'G.LINE,'iO.
E` r'y
n -E
1NVr-,:=c
A11Cv14' .r-= _ CHE_�
_CMA
KMA
i]l•i-4(73ci-2325
1 '1105B
'0129
111105
Conr 1Gi5!Qt_.-CMgr
'S, W
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
AARP -55 Alive
HARP
+001-4.350-4300
1 '1105A
11/05
Driver Safety Class-Snrs
96.00 116]5;'!0 04X-100_'1)<3=�
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
'6.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
AT ii T
til it
*011-40910-215
1 71105B
10/:3
11;65
1064';c
Sept -Long Distance Svcs
:1.35
-.. � hr_ �•�E rENDOR--------,
21.35
Hccount Temps
n•__:ur,Lrem
't. 4.5_-�:{;{,
4-c'
i_),,_{)
.1/05
__,1-_.__2'�
TEGY �r=-SrAcc. __-10/4
1,y5(1.75
TOTAL DLE VENDOR--------
-------Accur
Accurate
to Landscaoe
Acc'..r to
r?�'l-4322-2'21`)'711',`R
05/4626
10/2,9
11 `i)`
44Q16
Add I Mtce-Sep!F' F'gn Prk
2c.77
71105E 0414c26
17/,/211.`05
Y4';17
Addl Mtce-Sep Ptrsn Prk
5:'.,3?
'1105B 01/4626
10/_":+
111!05
44918
Add! Mtce-PGrow-Sep
6.147
!nr)1-45-2210
'il:c`B ib/4e.26
10/29
11/05
44919
add 1 Mtce-Sep!5mtrdge PI. -SQ
-F.
t,01-431.-2210
71105B 02i`4626
10/29
11/05
44?20
Addl Mtce-Sep!Hrtge Pro:
24.5!
2 711:58 J7!4626
10/29
11;05
44921
Add 1 Mtce-Sep/SycmrCvnPk
2.tt
+('C1-4:316-2210
2 711358 03/4626
10/29
11/05
44 64
Ada 1 Mtce-Sep Mple H Prk
2-'.5c:
TOTAL 'DUE VENDOR --------)
38.36
Acc'arate Landscape
Accurate
413Q-45.3'4-2210
2 711058 01/4624
10/29
11/05
44904
Oct"Addl Reprs/Dist #3'y
263.57
x001-4.331-2-210
2 71105B 01/4957
10/':9
11/05
45063
Svc Cyn Prk Fence Prep
480.00
*1'3,- 45 ,Q-5500
2'1105B 01/4623
10/2Q
11/05
45216
Oct Mtce-Dist #39
F; A90.o
TL?AL DUE VENDOR --------)
6,832.57
Alexander, Pamela
AlexanderP
Cc) 1-2 00-1002
1 711058
10;29
11/05
288Q5
Prk Dep RefundJRRPrk
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
50.00
All City Management
All City
¢001-4411-5551
2 711058 01/487:=
10!29
11/05
00157
CrssgGrd8vcs-9/15-28
3,149.22
kWI-4411-5511
4 7/11059 01/4878
10/2'9
11/05
001577
CrssgGrdSvcs-j9/29-10/12
2,945.49
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
5,094.71
_...............
i' , R NAME
VENDOR ID.
4 f
ACCDUNT PROJ.Tx-N0 SATC4 PO.LINE,,NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_N7Rr'
UE
:`v0IOE
_HH;CRIFT:UN
AMUUNT "TE
alvarex, Farla
AlvarEzK
#001-3470,
41
71105H
li)/3C
11; ),
IQqv
Recreation Refund -Tennis
:7.x:0
T07AL DUE VENDOR --------)
27.00
AmeriCamp
4mer:Comp
+001-4090-1::05
2
711050 01/50(-14
10i2a
11/05
13e'=1
Annual Printer Maint Agmt
2,7150.6f,
TC-TAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,550.00
American Storage LTD
AmerStorag
#001-4D''t•- 140
2
71105B 01/5C5-3
10/1;
11/05
100196
Storage Unit Annual Rent
�yc.0U
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
�90.CK)
Animal ='est Managecent
AnimalRest
*0
L
711056 01/4887
10/19
11/05
0074640 -IN
CoyoteCntrl-WhiteStar
:,500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
x,500.00
Aqua Backflow &
AquaBack
*001-4311__M o
4
711056 01/4944
10/29
11/OS
16434
Repr Bkflw Dev/PGrowPrk
X001-4:313-2110
4
71i05B 02/4944
10/2"Q
11/05
16434
Repr Bkfls Dev/HrtgePrk
'9.3'1
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
307.54
Beckley-Cardy
BeckleyCar
4001-4090-6220
711056 01/4862,
10/19
11/05
9631+)656
Panel Display System
1,14'2.59
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,193.59
Bear, Area
X1.39
+001-3478
4
71105A
10/19
11/05
19978
Recreation Refund
17.00
TOTAL SUE VENDOR --------
00
Bear, Anna
1174
(j1 4'=,
3y
7110SA
10/29
11)05
1='=73,
Recreation Refund
I4 V
107AL DUE 1-172 !DGR ---------)
34.00
Birch ThzTas A.
B.rchT
vX,I-1225
1
71105A
10; '9
11/05
/
Refun d -Impound Fees
6().W
TO?AL PRErAID AwOL'NT ----)
00.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
RUN TIIE: ! 1 15 1. 1t'�= � _ =N_ P=C STE�, F��
LUE-HRL..............:
YE..'kGR NAME •,ENDOR ID. t s FF'E=til: 4 4
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE,N0. E+TRr _`UE .NV- I E DEE IF'I2N AMOUNT DATE 3 t
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bluntach, Don 2185
*Cn)1-3473 3!; 11105A
Brandman Assoc., Michael Brandman
*0)1-230!7-1010 1 71105E
Brea, City of BreaCity
*001-4350-5300 2 71105B 01/4788
*001-4350-1200 2 71105B 01/4759
Brvan A. Stirrat & Assc PrvanStirr
*001-4510-5227
6
71105E
01/4360
*001-4510-5127
8
?1105F
1)1/4°60
*001-4510-5227
10
71105F
01/4360
4C!01-451()-51:7
12
71105E
)I/4558
+001-4510-5227
14
71105E
01/4526
nn„1-x51!?-` 27
1
11''5F',I/4;41
ContractSvcs-Sept '96
Bryan, Denny "
*i n)1-3478 12 71105A
Butler, Carol X171
r);1-3419 36 71105A
I__DUT CLOUT
*0G1-4010-1325 1 71105A
Caballero, Jonathan 2137
*001-3470 1 71i05A
1/29
11/05
1Q7/Q7
Recreation Refund
62,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------5
62.00
10/29
11/05
()8y6-2361
Prof Sery-FPL 9.3-10
92Q.07
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
929.07
10/29
11/05
57305
ContractSvcs-Sept '96
31,749.58
10129
11/05
57316
Supplies-RecPrgrm
3,002.80
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------}
34,752.38
10/30
11/C!5
Q8022
Inspection Svcs-TT51169
3,545.07
10130
11/05
'x5,122
Storm Drain Inspctn-51169
1,004.15
10!30
11/05
95136
Inspection EPa6-1234
3,207.76
10!1,0
11/05
IS181
7nspection-EP96-162
11.50
10/30
11/05
98181
Inspection -RW 96-223
180,00
30
ll/0.)5
Q 181
i^specticn-EP '96-12:9
21x15
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
4.25'x.53
10!29
11/05
19506
Recreation, Refund
12.00
TOTAL I'VE VENDOR --------}
12.00
10/29
11/05
192,13,Recreation
Refund
85.00
I3TAL DUE 'VEt0OR--------
135.1XI
10/?9
11/05
Meeting -10/24, Huff
12.00 11/05/9& 0!k(j,)'_t21'
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
11.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.0!)
10/229
11/05
19Q-.38
Recreation Refund
10.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
10.00
T.... ............. i s
Lk 'rh"IE k _ cPrii T
ACCOUNT PFOu.T/-NO BATCH PO.LINE/t0. ENT, ,ItuE :^i!:_IC SE_ -FI; -ISN AMOjNT DATE ,,HE'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Car,as, Fivatinc Bong CarisF
*it+J1-2,30,-1Ct02 i It, 5P
Cathcart/Pegin Associates Latncart
*250-4310-6415 024?7 2 7110`D 01/4907
Chapman, Kim
*001-3478
Chino Hills Ford
*0i i 1-41130-2200
21;+J
35 7111"A
fhHiiltord
71105E 01/4962
Ch.no Lock v, Security :,nincLock
't+J. 4 -110"E .-1 /511,_
::hou. Irene
*(?01-347,8
Chung, Hyun
4001-':' 73
Cintas Corp. #640
*01+1-4310-213'0
4001-4310-2130
*A')() 1-4310-21'30
_145
1.i 711+15A
ChungH
42 711:i5H
Cintas
2 71105E 01/4630
4 711058 01/4630
6 711058 01/46,30
Classe Party Rentals ClassePart
*001-4055-2130 2 71105B 01/4478
Sec itep Refund/RR Fre
`=1.?0+
70TAL DUE VENDOR --------)
itll2'�
11J05
114<
PetersonPb-Lghtg0rainge
6,314.5
TOTAL DUE 'JENDOR--------)
6,314.35
10/.:4
11/05
10029
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.00
10;29
11/05
17:160
OilChange-CMgrCar
55.81
TJTAL DUE VENLOR--------;
193"
Loc, 12•,s-i071E,c r
1.6 8.111
T'�TAL IdJE VENDOR --------)
1011129
1110`
1'-54
Recreation Refund
641.0(
-CTRL DUE VENDOR --------)
62.:10
10!30
11/05
Recreation Refund-Tennls
27.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
27.00
10/29
11/05
6404949855
UnifrmRent-PrkStaff
17.2E
10/29
11,0.5
640501968
Unifrmnent-PrkStaff
17.::8
10/29
11/05
640504056
UnifrmRent-PrkStaff
17.28
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
51.:34
10/29
11,05
7734
Suppls-RnchFestBooth
65.46
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
65.46
QuN TIME:
VENDOR NIAME )ENDOR :D.
ACLI-uNT PhOu.TX-NO BATCh FO.LINElNO. Et.: t.LuE 1'aE -JEz i:,MOUNT DH ME_
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC=fee Smith CoffeeSmit
*01) 1 - 4 09 0 - 2 3K.,5 711056 01/45"
*(Y)I-4090-2130 711')JB 020555
Commerce City Maintenance ComCtyMain
*001-4314 10 2 711056 01/4631
Community Disposal Co. ComDlsposl
*001-4510-5501 6 711056 01/4950
3ommunity Industries CommIndust
V101-4558-5521 2 711055 02/4620
Comp.ter Applied -,_ternsCAS
x,)Gi-405x'-4030 rliC!5H "1 '4520
.2y_ Janette
*,:C 1 - 347."n
Gnu �rgineerlr,g
rGJ1-4i�u-5201
4U 711=5H
DWEngine
71101D 01/472t,
D. B. Improvement 4ssoc. DBIA
15 2 71105C 01/4980
D1.,S Hssoc.ates :4S
• 1{�;-4::�.,-5'�l. 71105C 01 / 4 —t,
2262
Oct Coffee Seri
37.90
:uta
1i, 05
4:16
--I-t tgpmt Rental
10
TOTAL DUE 'vENDOR--------)
56.'x0
11/05
73458
Sep-F1oorMaint-Hrtgef'rk
4::5.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
45.00
10/2a
11/05
10/01/':�J,
Street Sweeping -09/96
7.c"(0.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,E*3.00
10/2'a
11/05
10/011,,Q5
LitterAdate-Sept Q6
2:a.44
T'-ITAL ''UE VENDOR --------i
_==.44
158nCe 1.otr Ma1nt-1'_+,
Rec,eation Refund -Tennis
=TmL DUE VENDOR --------;
10/29
11/05
%LB -12
B:b a-ervlces 9/ ()-10/_5
2a, 346.47
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------)
:9,346.97
10/29
11/05
Dvipmrt L-oce ;!uestionaire
1,=`0.00
TOTAL _",uE dtNLOR--------)
1,850.00
1012';
11/05
Neighborhood Traffic Stdy
5-5. ;0,0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
52215.00
-t _ t
DUE THF'_ ............... ._. _
VENDOR NAME VENDOR 1D.
til.--OUNT=nDJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NC. E+d C'_E :"•' .:c ::==;I r::id w�'t� F; i� - :n=
-------------------------------------------------- ------- —------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lailas Midwest :,a:: -as
:
_C ,1 4 ,_ _
Davis. Shara 151
4001-34' I� 71.?5A
Day & Night Copy Certer Dav&Night
11 F :171
THL :OR --------;
'1/05 1,461c
* (.l-40`+11-2100
2 71105C 01/4997
1+112-'
i1/,)5
5779
*101-4:50-12%
: 711J5C
1,0/29
11,315
� Cr?
4CN011-4210-2110
4 711050 01/4r,59
10./29
11/05
5811
*001-4210-2110
2 ,.:()SD 01/4659
10/29
11/05
`.81'9
+001-40'=)0-2100
3 71105C
10/29
11!05
582'2
Deere: Travel Bureau, Inc DePre:Trav
4001-4096-2330 : 711C,5A
..eFre: Travel Bore=u, TnCLP: _.T^a/
Dept of Transportation DeptTrans
*001-4511-5501 2 71105D 01/4575
Dewan Lundin & Assoc. Dewan
*25,)-4510-6411 10397 4 71105C 01/C3753
*250-4510-6411 10097 2 71105C 01/4710
Diamond Bar Business Asoc DB9usAssoc
*001-4090-2140 2 71105C 01/45918
f-001-409'0-2210 5 71Cj5C )2/4598
Rec,eat::-, Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
Copv5vc-P&RCommPacket''/26
CopvSvc-Recreation Signs
Copy Color Maps-VTM5220_'
RedevMaps-Color copies
CopySvc-SunsetKingParkPln
TCTAL DUE VENDOR
1012' 11•`05 ICSC Con; -5/97 Accom CMgr
TOTAL PREPAID "NMOUNT ----)
TCTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1� 2'� 11 iCS�Ccnf,='=tlC��m-JCOifnO
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----i
TO „L DUE VENDOF-------
v
143.41
3.25
54. 02
31.19
"2.15
314.02
170.30 11/05/,-6 1hn)U).30-'t4
1'0.00
0, 01)
n, "JO
U. (jo
10/29 11i05 1399`0 Signai/Light Maint-c/96 2,067.02
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1 2,067.02
10/29 11/05 CX)6-5a DsgnSvc-DB/SunsetKingRhab 200.00
10/29 11/05 007-1 ConstrMgt-SunsetXingkehab 1 ,405,50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 12,605.50
10129 11/05 1911,1918 Rent-5uites1GO,190-Nov 11,661.50
10/29 11/05 1911,1918 CAMChgs-Ste100,I9fJ-Nov 1,231.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 12,892.50
RLty"Ir._.-
_jE ...... _
17
L.affonc Ear - Erratibnai _.cintDeli
Diamond Bar Redevelopment DBan;;DA
*001-1315 1 71105.4
D i 3mond Bar-Wa l %t AAUW :IBWAAUW
*001-220-1002 i 71105C
Z.i,er_ifieo rar_ztran5it Dl.ersFara
¢ 1:
-4r5 3 -5529
l 1 Uf D :1,`4571.
E. =an Jab. Y;anning 'Camm
c- i-4211- 315 1 71iu5L
EI is abet4 F 1,71 tIi_ic�'T_�iF
5E '01,4Q41
ngi'eer:�g-Envl*��nmental t-!EnJLeol
4or1- (kki-1?1� 1 711050
Eng iPeer .no -Env 1runmental EngEnvGeol
*_`;:-451 -6411 IC�.197 b 71105C 01/4306
Epley, ,;ody 2146
*001-'473 11 71105A
1„ 11 ?5
�'_44
Er�gr.,g-interview Panel
IJTNL DUE VEN-LIOR --------)
101-10 111(:5
Advance - RDA Eip 11•;05
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,L ?.75
10r2� 1i,J5
2Qa 8
Refund Security Deposit
200.00
TOTAL DUE 'JENDOR--------)
00
final A Cab-';, is -30
,CTAL !UE 'v'ENDOR--------t
:0,11f:'_'.07
ir'La 11 15-"
Ann, -al Cue=_-DeE'-efanU
50.00
1.1THL 7 vG'MU1111 ----+
1.
7! -if 11..'5
lgnace
54.__
:TAL t!UE 'IErdDOR --------)
54.2{
11(C'S
B6li'iJ.iA,L54
Prof Svc_ -En 9A-145
455.:.
j 11/05
.]t1 -'021A.2`5
rcf Svcs -Er 'i6-148
__ _
TOTAL DL'E JENDIF'--------}
''1_.0_
101"2'1 11i�'S
Gt�16011A.2`2
CIF-�astXingnehabTesting
.. . ,_ �.UC
2 S5
T=,TAL SUE VENDOR --------)
2.':`.M
1?J29 11/05
19`20
Recreation Refund
12.00
'DTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
12.JU
N TIME: 1::15 .1,'1 =.
_ r
�' E 5
_ �'
�r,E
IUE 'HFt ...........
.....
..
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* n
ACCOUNT r'F'OJ.TX-NO
-------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE,NQ.
--------------------
EN'-I't'L'E
-------
-------
lN'V'-',ICc
-------------
DE.,fi)
----------------------------
AMOUNT
-------------
DATE YHE_
-------------------
E=-Guerra, Antonia
E_,uerraA
.
"11:5C
-
Reyund Secur:tv _cepaq-_it
1�t4
TOTAL ..E VENDOR --------}
-i•ii. ,f)
Pba =eaeral Credit Union
FtXrecitU
R� i i IIl i-�1a1'1.1 i
'I1"rA
_
Cn
F Fi rro:l tP1uctlon5
-f.'S
,
i 601' .4,-
li> �j..,
'D?AL FREPAID AMOUNT ----)
,',36 75
TOTAL DUE 'vENDG�' --------)
0.0t.
-.A Federal Credit •inion
F'�"Cred.tU
r _1x11'
"001--11�
%11+ A
5
it „a
1. _
r
11/6:
P ''1 7 r t
F- Payroll Leda_ icns
' F '� c
_ �t, .7,
5/3 0 1! 302-_0
11/0 ' 6 JOl)'._
TC'TAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
2,615.9.75
TGT�L DUE YENDOR --------)
0.00
Farago, F. Anthony
FaragoF
*001-SDG+:-UJli2 5
711O5C
10f2'V
I.id5
OJOQ45
Re*,r.d Security Deposit
50.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------1
50.60
Federal Express Corp.
FedExpress
*'201- =00-1010 C
711+75-
1 1 ''
11/05
`.•w2116152
Express "fall-FPL?6-34
`'.75
titai-40' 6--i-0 1
71165C
10/29
11,'05
`_'?-116152
Etpress Mail-Uan Govt
16,.'x0
TO`;�L DUE 'VENDOR--------1
:-77, Af
Federal Reserie dank
FedReserve
*001-2114-10Ct' 1
711050
ii a
11105
F'F-:x/21
Fa/roll CeductLans FP-`t l
:v"=':'
Feiiz,=atric.a
-153
:478 18
71105A
1012'9
11,05
IY;'40
Recreation Rettund
-�.00
-JTHL %UE VENDOR--------}
Firestone Stores
Firestone
*001-4-10-21200 -
71105C 01149835
10/29
11/05
Brake Repair-CodeEnf Trk:
248.7'?
TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------)
2483.79
Fong, Franklin
FongF
*001-4210-41fjo 5
71105D
16/2
11/65
Ping Cormn-09/09/96
60.00
*001-42.10-4100 6
71105D
10/29
11/05
Ping Cone-09/23/96
60.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------->
10.00
_'LIC, 4 1 ...............
,FNI0,; N�,
HmE VENDOR ID.e F E. -
ACCOUNT ;FOj.TY-NO EATICH PO.LINE-NO. Lr� T R 1, , LUE ' vv iS I- C E Ll 1 E E, PT '.,,-,,N "I. ANT DATE
niG�j ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E
_ o 1 ,
�— Transit
Foonill7r
71105H
10 71105H 02,4Q_'5
Franchise -ax 2card FrancniseT
2 7 t 1,_JIC
GES Exposition Svcs. TradeShow
f 0f�1
1-409t-'.141 :
GTE California GTE
40)0,1-433':'1-21.5 1 7111050
GTE California OTE
i-�X-1-4-14-21125 1 1111050
GTE --alifornia GTE
*001-4313,-21125 1 71105C
GTE California GTE
h,':0-4 C5-115 1 71105D
Garcia, Alberto '150
C..'01-111478 15 711005A
Garcia, Marlene 211 4.3
*001-0,478 8 71105A
3ubs1dy Frgr7j
1,
Oct -Transit Subsidy Fares
4 E'-.70
Oc -'7"ranslt Commission
DUE ,ENDOR --------
5,710. 15
!1/05
WithhlwlingOrder 3"2140,9f)
LuE VENDOR --------- I
50.00
16
il/011
Ku--�7CJ1.)04
ElectricSvc-ICCC Corlf�/'7t.
.o2.00
"ITAL DUE VENDOR --------
_'K .00
'11 `v5
Te I ephone -SycamoreCyn
78
TOTAL _nUE VENDOR --------
71
Telephone-HeritagePkBIdg
40.411
TOTAL :UE VENDOR --------7
4,1,41
10/2Q
11/05
Telephone -Heritage Park
53,46
_0TAL DUE VENDOR --------1
53.46
10/29
11/05
Phone Svcs -Library
54.n2
IS7AL DUE VENDOR --------
� j -., -'
10/251
11111)5
19613
Recreation Refund
34.";0
TOTAL SUE VENDOR --------
34.00
1011--';
11/05
195.32
Recreation Refund
1�.0llj
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
1.(m0
= 5 _..............
4 _, c e :'
A��S�FtaT=F"Cu.Tk-NO BATCH F'C.LINE•N0. EN-S1,GLE ai'..._E D'E=:-i = -- DF
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ge:;, Trudr
X001-'41'.
�? 711 �)5A
ucldenberg, ^1;c�a?1 co:denU
#0.'1-4210-4100 1 '1105L�
Goilins, Michelle 2I 1
*001-3418 2r 'll+iSA
'}rafrit: Ccntrcl 3,.stems GrafltlCon
o-.;;1-+_�•.-_5�0 .. llia`�.. !�i/rE•.3�
2rainger ura:nger
�f,+i1-4^14-211? 71iG5C)`,4A.-:4
Hald.man, L�ec'� Haldeman➢
11- 347" 44 711,05H
,ail z, roreman Hall&Forem
45..-:. _ 71105E 01/4445
71105E ';1174454
4 71105E 01/4480
"101 _j 4 71105E 01/4746
4 71105E
?01-05`1-`113 2' 71105E il1/4813
.-fall & Foreman stall&Forem
X15':-4''10-6415 11197 t, 71105n 01'4?ji
Fe_,eat.on Re;und
0 T AL VENDOR --------)
62.+ n
11/+?5
1
�-eution Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
20.00
1r;72a
11/05
Flnq
W-00
-1L DUE VENEM --------
10',
11IiI5
::0u 2, 7
Recreation Refund
:4.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------?
>4.00
10r.'
tl�t5
DBG'�'�6
Graffiti Removal -'4/96
�'6Cr,iJO
ECTAL DUE VENDOR --------,
`'cir.UO
1011
11/v5
30-`1?3't.-`
RepicmntLamps-HrtgPkS1dg
Ik.. _
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
13b.S?
10130
11/05
Recreation Refund -Tennis
i,AL DUE VENbOR--------`
00
10/30
:1;05
-_:
Fri-i#4560-51/Wail inspctn
ii.<5
:0
11,05
1�=;�'Sr,
Pro��453U-52;RW°•.Grdg PC
2`.a.=7
li/w
032717
rroj;45d'!-0547FW inspctn
179.74
17/:0
11 /',)5
i327,-,8
Frou44580-05 ;I
Flan Lk
t.i:.'ifh
10,'30
11/05
03::761
Froj#458+1-5c/Aug Frof Sev
:55.00
1:,,=0
11; V5
:2759
F1anCnkServ;F`ro,t#4580-061
_V7. 7Q
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1.627.02
10/ 0
117x5
=2710
SycCyn Crk:hed Repair Flan
1,4U.0�i
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,640.00
FU
ENDOR NAME
;ENDO+ lb.
ACCOUNT QOJ.TX-?4O FATCh F'O.LINE '40.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E -T
.7il uE
Harmony, Cialr
HarmcnvC
F)C+1-4010-2220
1 71.1()54
10,'2
11'45
'rerClemAdvance-RedevConf
4:.50 11/4`,''41.O00001,62---
'OTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
13.3.50
TOTAL DUE VENCOR--------)
0.06
Herrera, Carol
HerreraC
*001-4010-2�L'0
3 71145E1Q."Q
11,'05
i0!22!'qE•
Relmt-League Conf 10i1
1`.,.`4
TJTAL DUE VENDOR --------`
.5.'}4
`igy Pclnt Grap`lcs
,'' 3hPo, -t
71105E 01r464S
10." -`G
..,--
-5o.=
PreF're553vc-CrrndRlde BDor.'
1..:4
lil
4 ''5E C1'4648
iC =+sJ
11,:`
`5:1$
'r'reF'ressSvc-OCMA Program
A 5
-1145E 01/4�4c'
1V'/ 1j
11/0-
5544
PreFressSvc-3CMA Program
115.94
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
1113.71
Rouse, Lhuck
71105A
11/05
Rec^eatlon Refund
34.+:)
''-TAL DUE VENDOR --------?
-4.00
Howell, Art
711V5A
li;:'�
11(05
1''''''_D
Recreaticn Refund
47.:'0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
47.,)0
,+uan, Scohia
4I)+:,i-347°
)1 711': `_A
10/29
11/05
19'x='1
Recreation Refund
1�.:,n
-DTAL :'UE 'VENDOR --------
(10
)cuff. �obert
Huffu
_114_�
�
`,
_
t,)1/'
5.
_
'E:"ii, x411 F��Drr Cid
16.i-
10, _'•G
11';}5
.. =h
Reirb;Leacue Conf
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR- --------;
4c,,.44
:CMA ;.etlrement Trust -457
IT CMA
x(i1,1-211'0-1007
_ 711,5E
i1)!_")
11/05
1A 2','9t.
Nov Ded/PP2Q&21
;21D,1XI
1)O1-a_.'t}
1 1111u5E
10/30
11,'05
1012c!96
Nev Cafe/Cty Mgr
1.IQD.70
-404Q-00QO
171145E
-
i0 30
, ��
11105
11 C"' ;=
)' ., ++
Nov�Jov Cafe. ty lk
C
,r ' a'
i,..l_
-(V,1J0
—0_
77
11 15
1)/'� 0b
Nov lafe„Fin Dept
4 1Q
-
xOGti--
41)4S-)i'{(j
1 71115E
i0r?0
.1;45
10/29/95
ND. Cafe/Cam Rel
SC.C7
t, )
7117.1
10/*
11105
10%19/:+6
Nov Cafe/Com Rel
_..2h
*00!-421(}-0090
1 71105E
10/34
11/05
10/29!;6
No, Cafe!Pianng
1,10 42
,,,001-4'10-01-, l
nq
1 711. _E
iJ, �0
W
N�
11.3._
( 'r 9
i �/': /,b
NovNav Cafe(PrH Sec
401.4 7
*001-4314-0+)Q0
1 71105E
10;?0
11/105
10/29/96
Oct Cafe Ber+eflt
4131.49
-001-4350-0090
1 71105E
1.^/30
11/05
10/2i/96
Nov Cafe/Cantu Sery
51).39
001-4511-Oi00
1 71105E
10/=0
11/J5
10/29)96
No+, Cafe/Pub Wk.s
462.06
.TOTAL DUE i'ENDOR -------- 12`.I:10
I -
.mace 1Y Systems ,-,c. mace4SI s
71 1I,,j5 224:';5 --,-ier Cop,, Clh.arges
7 1)-� Ilj,'.iFi 2,24.3-45 1aint.onicaCGp,Er -,`45
�j 0 1 - 4,u9t) - _- (I - I
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------- ---
E
.-a-d :ffpire S, -age
1-.7-MpStage
11/05 014313
Copy Charges -Oct
341.9';
*601-4090-2200
0. ,0 i-4 -53' 10
71105E 0114784
10/110
!I;.)'j 092189r
Excurs-GondolaGetawy
E 3
1 E T E
7'105E tj 4 7,2 4
10/110
11/105 OKR'�6
Trnsp-GndlaGetaoiav
_E ...................
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
567.19
VENDOR NAME
VENIC= :D.
TJT�'L DUE VENOOR ----------
1 35. �Xj
Inland Valley MY BLIletn
lVDB
H'-flOUNT PRCJJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH F'O.�INE,,40.
ENTF1
- DjE
_NVO 7 CEJuz
T F T ON
11/05
:CMA IRetirement Tr,,,st-457
TL'MA
*001-2300-1010
4 711.')5D
1.)/29
111/05
'-egal Ad -FPLQ6-fC,49
�70U: -4551-000
1 '11'+`_E
NL., EazleFub *.s
44..
-';u 1 -4553-009f)
1 1 ')5-
1 '11:}5E
:1;05
I. -J,
- -
No'v LafE.ub 14�s
1 71 1 C'H
Nc, '�'Id Wste
1105
10* _46
Ncv Cafe/AQMD
1 71105E
11,105
10/2 'aE
It,, Caf, H
- '71
30
11,'f15
10/2"" 6
Nov '-..3fe/CDBG
453-- -02",
1 71105E
I I /�0,;
10 "20 / �C,
Nc� Cafe 'LLADt
39 - 45 --9-00rw)
I 711051E
11 '(15
'0/ Qi;6
Nov Cafe,'LLAD#S,
X4.08
1141-4541-0090
1 -1105E
10/'0
11105
Nov Cafe/LLA10#41
34. ('j8
*CIO I - 4,Y-_0- r'0�.
. . I
- 1105H
10/.30
11 '05
3821
DIrtly Plan Fee -401(a)
1 25. 00
x001-409+-0093
5 711 �fE
10 ) J' I
11;05
8821
Cor- ec t i or,
125
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
7
.-MA Retirement -41'!
ICMA401
7110`E
11.1,11C,
lli,.I5
10,12rtPlz!
PP2c)-21 ','Ontr,,b
I,_-30.76
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
1,-30.76
11CMA FEtirement-401
1 EMWI I
4- U f'j 4 f) (P-3
6 71105E
10,:1
11 / (Fj
:4321
Orti. Plan Fee -401(a)
125.+10
.TOTAL DUE i'ENDOR -------- 12`.I:10
I -
.mace 1Y Systems ,-,c. mace4SI s
71 1I,,j5 224:';5 --,-ier Cop,, Clh.arges
7 1)-� Ilj,'.iFi 2,24.3-45 1aint.onicaCGp,Er -,`45
�j 0 1 - 4,u9t) - _- (I - I
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------- ---
E
.-a-d :ffpire S, -age
1-.7-MpStage
11/05 014313
Copy Charges -Oct
341.9';
*601-4090-2200
0. ,0 i-4 -53' 10
71105E 0114784
10/110
!I;.)'j 092189r
Excurs-GondolaGetawy
X
11/05 094tOA
7'105E tj 4 7,2 4
10/110
11/105 OKR'�6
Trnsp-GndlaGetaoiav
-,45,,)0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
567.19
TJT�'L DUE VENOOR ----------
1 35. �Xj
Inland Valley MY BLIletn
lVDB
*001-.",00-1010
3 71105D
10/2Q
11/05
Legal Ad -FPLQ6-0-14
7c, 37
*001-2300-1010
4 711.')5D
1.)/29
111/05
'-egal Ad -FPLQ6-fC,49
101.25
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- ) 178.12
nt'l Business Equipment InBusEquip
001-40191,-2100
7 71109E 02i4763 101130
11/05 014313
Copy Charges -Oct
341.9';
*601-4090-2200
4 711105E 01j4761
1 -1
11/05 014313
Mcnthy Copy Serv-Cct
1 t,lj. 00
*001-4090-2200
711 Q5E ['1156
11/05 094tOA
SlapleWire-Xerox
610.21
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
567.19
I
PLN '-'IE: 10:..
ACCOUNT FPOJ.TX-NO E";' --- 7 7 =u`; •,i Dr _
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intl Council of Shopping ICS:.
4vn)I-4o;; '-mo 3, o() 1 711'15A
Intl Counc:l of Shopping TC:C
,CI -40`G -x_30 4 7116-5A
intn 1 Institute Mun CM Intnllnst
0j)1-4040-_ 315 1 71105E
(071-4140-2315 _ 7111,5E
AJS Elite Building AJEiite
#0 }1-40'?lj- Z17 71105E 01/5011,
Jacbz ;;o_:e. Jennie 216_
4(n;,1-3478 _7 711('5A
Jeeco Jeeco
X041 40''1-= 10 10 711115E 01/4987
"11c:21 Data Systems JudDataSys
*-)(,1-44.1-5405 1 71105E
}ens hardware
Kens
*001-4310-12K,0
3 71105H
02/4637
:01-42_-2210
11 71105H
06/4837
$001-4331-210
3 71105H
07/4637
?:t:11-4350-1200
711J5H'02,'41,37
4001-4311-.10
6 71105H
0:-/4637
f)1-4('4()-1�T)o72
7111:+5H
01/46.37
1{}n1,-4'14-2210
6 71105H
04/4637
t001-4318-__1+)
711U`H
05/4837
I_SLCnr-5/' CMq'
_Ci ,0 i 11 `:='4-: i('? ;
-CiAL FREP-�ID AM UNT ----?
Lnc r,n
TC`;L DUE ';fNC:.n--------'>
(.(t0
ICS_ Con f-5,Fl- DeSt2fanc
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
_(01110
TCiTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
10/30 11/05
10/07/4F,
7 Mbrsnp Fee/Cty CIF•
1_5.0+7
x7/30 11/05
10/07/'x6
97 Mbrsnp Fee/Dep CClk
50.00
TOTAL D;UE 'JENI'OR--------}
175.00
1))1=:0 11105
2,1,67
CarpetCin0FlrWaz-CS Ctr
2_5.00
Tu7AL DUE VENDOR --------t
`15.00
10t'1'a 11/"5
1'x,2,`7
Recreation Refund
:5. i+7
TOTAL '-UE ;ENEOR
10/30 11;05
_01::7
FloorStripMachne Rental
43.2x'?
Tr.TAL DUE VENDOR --------i
43.97
10/30 11/t15
3`451
Sept Parking Citation Adm
155.40
:-Q AL DUE 'VENDOR -------->
155.40
lig/-•0 111105
Fars Dper Supp; its
143.'?a
10/30 11:05
Reagan Pk. maint Supplies
454.13
10/3G 11/05
Sycamore Maint Supplies
try/30 11,'05
Recreation Supplies
-
10/30 11!05
?6%i'
Grow Park Maint Supplies
266.5
101_0 11/05
'x7416
Operating Supplies -_Mgr
4.51
10/30 11/05
97444,'-74c,-'
Her:tagePH4aint Supplies
34.Q6•
10/30 11;05
97511,97258
Maplehill Maint Supplies
67.52
TC -4L DUE VENICR--------}
1,`50.=3
RLN' TIRE: 1 = - = = T T R =
iJE TH -..............
'.VENDOR NAME VENDOR iD.
+i i CUNT :OJ. i �.- �O -ATCH PO.LINE,N0. E-vTR1, ilUE IN'.C, ICE r 3L1 it T : JN nr, 'uNT -iATE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• ens Hardware
I eels
*001-40'00-12"_0
11. 711!j5H 1'?z4'_,-7
-,001-421';-1:'00
711:+5H 09/4537
*001-43110-1200
4 "1105H 10;4,07
10/30 11 /05
; 71105H 13'/4637
001-4?lE,-2210
4 711 ()`H 12,14A -7
*+m1-4116-2210
h 71105H 02/5027
4001-431.9-2210
3 71105H 14/4637
4001-4328-2210
3 71105H 16/4637
*001-4331-X10
6 711))`-'H 01/5027
*001-4350-1100
7 71105H 18/4637
*001-4311-2210
7 71105H 11/4627
*001-4331-2210
4 71105H 17'4637
*001-4:322-2210
4 71105H 15/4637
4`lm, Jenny -105
*001-3478 10 71105A
Kirk Paper Kirk Paper
*601-40,770-1100 7110,5E 01/5051
L.A. County -Sheriff's -Uep LAL3her•iff
40,01-4411-5401 1 71105H
LA Cellular Telephone LACellular
*11.01-41;30-212` 1 71105G
?•001-40Qc)-2125; 3 71105G
*,.-1x1-4415-21_15 1 711056
Landscape West
*141-4541-5500
O i -4•`_•55-5508
Lara, Maria
*r101- 347'3
LandscapeW
2 71105E 01/414
2 71105E J)1;4619
1144
�a 7ll05A
/
iii j4j 11 i�5
_..13.
10/ U 11!05
122.?'-
l,i/3,C1 11 /05
1°.47
10/31) 11/05
5.55
10/30 11 /05
94.65
10/130 11105
14.31
10/30 11105
3.=
10/30 11/05
294.64
10/30 11/05
9.70
10/30 11/05
96873
11-0/30 11/05
97129
101=0 11;05
97254
110129 11/05 1 .'7 3C)
10/11111;+115 62451114
10/30 11/05 81065
10/31) 1;105 12 72444
10/20 11/05 12,472444
10;'0 11!05 11x72444
10/30 11!295 18926
1,j' / 30 11/05 1'� 125
10/2+ 11/05 1?556
Main _.Yp Ies-Ger I Govt
:es -PI arning
_..13.
Fare. Supplies
122.?'-
Heritage -Maant
1°.47
Maplehlll-Maint
5.55
MaintSupplies-MapleHill
94.65
Peterson -Maint
14.31
Summitrdge-Maint
3.=
MaintSupplies-SycmreCyn
294.64
Recreation Supplies
9.70
Grow Pk-Maint
11.10
Sycamore - Maint
1.`33
Reagan Rk-Maint
21.20
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------} ';128.78
Recreation Refund 31.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 311.:0
Copy Paper EZ 4.
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 684.12
Sept Contract Svcs
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} law,473.99
Sept Chgs/Cty Mgr
sept Chgs/City Council
Sept Chgs/Comm Vol
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
Maint Dist #41 -Sept
WeedAbateSvcs-Sept
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Recreation Refund
TOTAL DUE VENEUR--------}
-
161.7:3
144.90
2 '+50.00
4,645.84
7,595.84
62.::0
2.00
ckTLH F'O.LINE;NO. E, • rILE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
League of U -a. Cities League
3�+11-4i;_;1,-.:_'•ni� i '11U5A
Lerman, Rodney -i4Q
W;;l-_470 14 7110CA
4001-1418 :11U`A
Leighton and Associates Leig`.ton
•001-�=.0�,-101;' . i1�5'c
Levin, E.sie :175
34''. 4-- 711..5r
_ewls Engrivir,d_ :"C.-?W15tngia
i�ir_�-4�}t 5-x111 _ a_5E
5E 1
_lnde';trr,�, 0e'o
L.ocai uovernment
*001-4210-2315
Loft, Nickie
*00 i- 3478
LocGovCom
71105D
2136
1 71105A
Los Angeles County MTA LACMTA
*112-455:;-5533 2 71105E 01;4'x'-7
*112-455.3-5535 t 711115E 0-2,4927
League Conf-Haraksin
141,00
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----7
140,00
TOTAL DU VENDS -' --------i
?,00
10r
11/05
1:524
Recreation Refund
:5,00
101-'9
il,'05
1' 5:.4
Recreation Refund
_5.00
T OT'iL D 'E ++ENiun
> b+ .0p
'x415
Aug 5erv1EN' ..i=;T
I i 1.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------?
11..00
1C)
.1"05
1a'A
Recr-maticn Refund
'vENDOR --------
7,1es-IW, T",rr52
=�.��,
DUE VE'r'i;GR --------7
10;'��
11105
1';5 5
Pei--neation Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
20.00
10/2+
11/05
Membership - DeStefano
5r1.i10
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------5
50.00
10/29
11/05
Recreation Refund
40.00
rUTAL DUE 'JENDOR--------i
40.W
10/30
11/05
10/30,'96
Oct-TrnstSLbsd�F�grm
35i�,2s1
10:30
11005
Oct-TrnstSubsdyFares
-^_5..0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR' --------?
1,145.00
...............
VENDOR NAME 10,
ACCOUNT FRIJ.TX-NO :TCH PO.LINE,NG. PNTRI,DUE NvF1 C E DE-," --JN
AM6UNT7,ATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M?H Proo.arty 'Management *9"'4P'0ne't
-4
-gnuSon
Mairtex a ter
5E
)1 -4`i4 -i2
FE ','4t
00
--Y
ianela' 1-1,05e
liripasa Horticultural "ar i posa
136 - 45.--'S - 5"?. -'O 711105E 047o!7
0138-4'.3"13-2210 - illUtE
Martindale, Ahn
McGill, Cecilia
*001-34712
McManus, Joseph
4001-4210-4100
Martindale
6 71105E
McGI 1 IC
71105E
McManus)
8 71105D
CU
-,--7AL '-'UIE )E'ZOR --------
1 50
—ion Re;ur,�
:UE VENDOR --------
40.,*
T�
E 1"Ur- E'11� - --------- I
J1
HL j --'E 16115DR --------
!0/30
1'I/v5
)8 0
SEPt MtCE-515t #-'Q'
-J,
1Q/ -S0
11)05
dW
zept Hodl MaIrIt-LLA1438
I 6C). 38
TOTAL DuE VENDOR --------
-3,427.18
10/30
11/oF5
30915
Park Sec Dep Refund
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
5G. ".10
10/30
11/05
0--1�997/
Refund!Laughlin Excur
44.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
44.00
1012`4
1Ii05
Ping Comm-Oi/23/96
60.0u
13TAL DUE VENDOR -------->
bu. CIO
SLE-HFt..............i:
.-
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR 1D.
ACCOUNT F'ROJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCH F'O.LINE,NO.
EN-- /DUE
INVE-10E
DEE_F,'IF'11UN
AMOuNT PATI: CHE-
Metrolink.
Metrolink
iii.:-4_Jr ��.;.;
`- "-'-'
6
� U
711;5F -114�C_
1.i/3t1
11;C15
IA) C�,;t
� t- �-
Oc rnstSj�sayFrgrm
-_...
4 `-- _
X112-4553-53.5
6
_,
711h5F J''4`' b
i),'_O
ii,�i`
..
1) -•t:'
'_n.,'-'6
-"
Jct-Trn�,;ubsoyhares
o _
1 ,24�.cC1
*11C-4`5=-553:,
4
711i15F 01/4805
16 1,t"
11105
Sept-TrnstSuosc_',,Prgm
¢,;:,a,;0
�11I'-4553-5`,:,5
4
71105F 02/4c,05
10; 30
11/u5
r',;' 6
Sept-irnstSudsdyFares
57'a.PO
TG;AL DUE VENDOR --------)
41,')77. C-0
Mitts, +.aren
MittsK
*061-2300-100:
7
71105E
141 +)
11105
02?':)75
Summtrdge Frk. Dep Ref
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
5C'.00
Mollura, -ebby
-'154
*001-.473
1';
711P,5A
10/2Q
11/05
1'701
Recreation Refund
62.00
FCTAL DUE VEN;:OR--------)
a2.00
Morshed and Associates
Mars ed
*001-4010-4• i:0
2
711050 01/476'=
10 ,1310
11/05
Ser; s; Oct
? ,C11)() .00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,DX., io
Mt. Baldy United ;
,-,UN T I `t E: 11
d
0_ C
H=
SUE TNP
.............ii
.- -
VE^ DOR NAME
�E 'Ofi iD.
AC_G NT FF'QU.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH FC.LINE;.JO.
Er;-P(/DUE
IN1='::E
LIE C-=,:F'
AMO''NT
DATE C :
Onsoe, Aalai
OnsoeA
+001-3478 45
71105H
10/30
11!)5
Recreation Refund-Tennis
54.)0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
54.00
Oronoz Painting & Drywall
,�ironozPain
*(Z'1-400')-2230 2
71105A 01/5021
i0/2
11/05
43611
Fainting/Repairs-ComCtr
2,525.00
11/r5/3� 0(in'i:;t2
TOTAL PREPAID AMCUNT ----)
1,525.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------)
0.00
P.F. Pettibone & Co.
PFPett=n
*001-4210-1200 2
71105D 01/486'=
10/29
11/05
5515
Ping Conus Minute Books
271.10
TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------->
271.10
PERS Health Benefits
PERSHealth
*061-2110-1003 3
711050
!W-1
11/05
Nov
Nov-Health Ins Premiums
10,245.8::
X001-40'P0-:09.3 4
722050
10/31
11/05
Nov
Nov-Health Ins Admin Fees
51.23
TO_;AL DUE v'ENLOR--------'t
10,297,.v5
aul Gardner Corp;,ratian
Fa..jardnr
*250-4`2:-e�}12 (0c"97 2
; i105C 01!407:
10/2'a
11/:+5
Left,rn'=7 ;ni-Mt -acre:
1,0 •2.53
4
i i _•`_G _ ; d' 1
ri i L
l i i5
LttTrnagni-C ccprgsr l+Bb
25.'rj
'11r5C J3, 4,J i
1)i'2a
11/�+.5
Lr-brCyn; GicnSpg
i,1'a. T
I-T!•'IL DUE --------•
Fayroll Transfer
fl,i;i-i SIV i
'11 �5A
1:ji�
li :�
Fayroll Tans+er - FF21
'7TAL ='^EF'AID AMOUNT ----)
52_ur_::r.m
rOT;L DUE VENDOR--------)
0.1"(D
�'avrcll '^ rSfar
PayrcllTr
0;)1-102( 2
71105H
101';)
11/05
Fayroll Transfer
51,000.00
11+O51°c
TOTAL FREPAID AMOUNT ----)
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR----------
+:1.00
Photo Plus by -,im
PhOtOPIL5
00 40'5-2112 2
':1056 0124649
10/�v
11,05
75716
r`h�tographicSvcs
34.56
TOTAL ]UE VENDOR --------)
34.86
-'JN T'ME:
-=E T�-F_............. -_ =
VENDOR TAME VENDOR ITS.
ACCOUNT rRCJ.TX,-NC BATCH PO.LINE!NO. ENTF'Y71jUE INVOICE 0E'_:RjP7j3N AMOUNT DATE CNE--r
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pomona Judicial District PomJudDist
*t)O11—��23
711q�G
10/30
11/05
10/070%
Sep Parkirq Activity
li?)•')"
*001-3223
i 711056
11.1,"10
11/05
' 1091156
Aug F'ao ing Activity
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
3hJ5.00
Pomona Valley Humane Soc. PVHS
*001-44?1-540..
4 711050 01/4579
10130
11/05
42500-08
Oct Animal Cntrl Sery
4,'?5'x.17
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
4,359.17
Pomona Valley Fipe
PomViyPipe
*001-4311-210
5 71105D 02/4943A
10/29
11105
13787
Dr16 ingFtnParts-Grow Pk
51.'95
*001-4313-2210
5 71i05D 0114943A
10/29
11/05
13787
DrinkingFtnParts-Her Cage
51.96
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
103.92
Princess Resort
Housingb
*001-4040-2330
1 71105E
10/30
11105
12,14/96
CCLaw&Electn-Burgess
180.67
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------)
180.67
Puo'ic Empl Retirement
PERS
1 71105A
10/2q
ilp_5
Excess Contrib Credit
`__'.e:-- 11/05' , (K.00',
*=n=?1-2110-1003
1 71105A
11;,:5
PKI -Retirement -ontrib
J1 11 05,/' 6 ClCirj r,L71
#Gui- 110-1?08
2 'iii+SA
10/2`4
11/05
PP211-Retirement Contrib
'. _..2? .1, 55/'='6 40±01)_?; .c
T.;TAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
1,3.30.6"
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
0.00
Puri: iss F;ose-PSI
PurE. iss
*25:,-4310-6415 118'x7
4 71105G 01/4753
10/30
11/05
8721
Sun�e, Crossing -Pk Design
1 500.00
T:7.T4L DUE VENDOR --------)
1,`_� ..0f)
;e^ro GrapFi:s
ReproGraph
Y);1-40'yt- i1U
2 71105G 01/5031
100)
1:/05
7'491
BusL-ardImprnts
50,.35
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
56.:5
Reyes, Angie
2141
*QGi-34'8
6 71105A
10/2
11/05
1x655
Recreation Refund
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
Riv-.ards Watson & Gershon
RichardsWa
*i;C1-4020-4021
2 711053± 01,f47,C
10;=0
±1/05
84970
Spec Legal Sery-LLADs
2�.5h
-40(:1-40'20-40'21
1 7111?50 01/47=:0
. -.1/30
11/05
X6179
Spec Legal Sery-LLADs
351.'30
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
579.30
Y:
VEND P NAME VENDOR 1L.
_4LLL,'JNT F-%j.TA-NO BATCH F'Q. ::aE,'10. c„?Fi :,jE s'! :CC uF .'J D•
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'i'e `_umuing Specialties RitePluxg
�ti-I-4_i4-22i': 1105u 01,'`0.4
,'obert DrirEr Ins Co. Gulr ve
1 711C,5A
=cmero, Lr.ia RomeroL
Q 711050
RonKran;er&Assoc C,E.
Inc RY'A
+001-4551-5223
14
71105G
01i4801
001-4551-5223
16
71105G
02/48005
*001-4551-522=
18
711050
01/48'q6
*101-4551-5 23
20
71105G
011'4351
5ftiil-4551-52)22
78.75
71105G
01/436'2
*-F01-4`•51-5223
24
71105G
01 14()P9
*001-4510-52-27
1t'
711055
01,'4196:
C C -i
-?':11-4,51- �_�,
=
711050
/11i3466
+i,-'1-45`_1-52
10
711050
01141?
ACCOUNT ;'6'7J.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TX-Pt0 b'rTCH F'C.i_iNE/'VD.
EN ;
•DUE
iN.'=:=L
:E :R F, TON
AMOUPdi DATE CrE=
Rutan & TLCher
FutanTuck:r
*0n1-4020-40 1
4
'11J5G ':'115,'1__
16/36
11'i15
1_ '_ =_
Sept Leqal Svc -Harmon,
4 •;.'.
_,AL DUE VENDOR
Ruzac>a, 'lsrph
T.
?,.ictiaJ
-411C-4100
711tD
i0 2
1; 5
F'1^,G Comm-_'''ritafQ;
:"ng 1--omm-6 J
TO DUE 'VENDOR -------->
i 0
Salca-a, Denise
*IICi-34%'D
3_1
71105«,
1G,��
11!07
19514
Recreation Refund
31.00
T9TAL DUE VENDOR --------i
_1,,00
San Gabriel Viy
Tribune
SGVTribune
C)C1- 00-1011.;
1
71105L
1o/219
11/1,5
Legal Ad-FF'L96--:49
?
*001'-__310-10 10
6
;11ti}5G
10,130
111,05
1'4668
;1R''b-i`.'F LF""'b-34
109.71
TOTAL DUE vENDOR--------;
45.c4
Sarinana, Regina
F.
:1h7
tt 01-34=
_2
71105A
11/05
iQ651
Recreation Refund
1 .00:
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------7
,Chad, --,on
Sch; cil
*061-410-4100
G
711i;5D
111/05
Fing Comm-r';;Cra;aE.
60.+:0
x`_i:1-4�i,a-i1i)0
#
711 5D
1 i; '�
li;'05
Ping Comm-09/23/'ah
nil, fQ
TOTAL CUE VENDOR --------f
:haiir.ar Tours {
Gnarter
;,halimar
11�-4"_ -5.310:
4
71105G 01/5005
10, 13.0
11/M
E43C
RoseF'rd-Trnsp Dep 1/1/'?7
j)O"jO
TOTAL CUE VENDOR --------
0
Shine a 21ind
ShineaBlin
31-40?0-2110
12
711056 01/5007
10/30
11/05
1e•,'a5
MiniBindClnq-CmCtr
17D.0"j
TOTAL :SUE VENDOR --------1
17�.0)
Sir Spzedy
SirSpeed',
*i;';l-46go-1110
?110`_=F 01:4`02
10,30
11/a}j
20271
Frig -Mailing lapels
74.4
s?01 4C}'�t1- 110
4
711:)`h •11x4;'28
I0r'0
11/05
1:464
NrtgSvc-Com Svc Ctr Flyer
39.62
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------)
1c4,
VENDOR NAME VENDOR 1D.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NC BATCH PD.LINEiflO. ENTRIAUE W',07CE "DE :,CR[FTiON Arl"6 2NT E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smart °g Final
Smart&Finl
*001-4350-1200
5 71105F )1/4642
10/3,v
11/r-,5
2140614
Supplies/Tiny Tot Prog
#125-4215-1200
2 7i1U5F ')1'4146
10;:)0
11/05
_242 -'?9
Supplies-SrActi.ities
7.'J
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
`6. ;`
Southern Ca. Edison
SOCaEdlson
*001-4510-2126
1 71105H
10/0)0
11/05
Electric Svc -Traffic Cntl
3,' , 00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
Standard Insurance of
Ore Standardln
*001-1110-1005
1 71105E
10/30
11/05
10/18/96
Nov Life Ins Prems
473.50
*001-1110-1005
2 71105E
10/30
11/05
10/13/96
Nov SupplLifelnsPrem
-0.40
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
498.90
Starcer, Rose Marie
StarcerR
*001-3472
3 71105F
10/30
1105
02Q'498
Refund -Laughlin Exc
44.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
44.00
State Compensation Ins
Fd StateComp
*:`r1-1110-1011
1 7110`_,A
10721`1
11/05
8:310
Juli-3ept WC Premiums
:3.16 tliu5" r �fi(Hai '
x.)i�i 110-1 i1
5 711i?SA
10/29
11;05
0410
Jul -Sept WC Premiums
325.65 il; i5/';6 _)iw ii _.;21';
-211)-1011
71105A
10/_'?
ii/OS
'?4"'
July -Sept WC Premiums
41_.01 il,u5/'a,; n;0«}_f)2:
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
4,731.80::
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
Sumpter, Christina
SumpterC
*001-3473
46 71105H
10/30
11/05
Recreation Refund -Tennis
2.7.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
21.00
Time Out =ersonnel Svc.
TimeOut
*Of)1-4046-4000
2 71105E 01/5006
10/30
11/05
1627
TemNSres-Recept 9/27
76.72
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,.72
Tim 'pan Wim le
T'omVanWink
*_5,)-4510-6411 10097
8 71105F 01/4QO4
10/30
11/05
11"7
Sunset Xing/Videography
1,500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,600.00
Traffic Control Svc Inc.
Tr-afficCon
*001-4095-21130
4 71105F 01114901
10/30
11/05
88190
EquipRental-RnchFestvl
437.50
*001-4095-2130
6 71105F 01t4" 81
1:),''30
111105
:91.32
EquipRental-RnchFestvl
::10.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7'7.50
%est End Uniforms
ti �i ;1-4415-1::i+0
WestEndUni
2 71105F 01/4731A 10/30 11/05 425::: Unfrms-V1trPtrl/Sept 1+13.44
West Publishing Co. WestPub
*)01-4090-2320 2 71105F 01/4513
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) i':+'=.44
10/30 11/05 37140°06 CA CD An V23,Pts 1-3 70.20
TC"AL DUE VENDOR --------) 110.20
RUN 'IME:
L_
h E R F.
'E "5 1 2 T E R
0 -
,:UE
'hF'U.............11,
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
PRE; ID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/N0.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOILE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECY
Turner, Judy
2142
X001-3473
7 71105A
10l='
11/(15
1x733
Recreation Refund
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
50.00
Usher, Frank
UsnerF
}001-4030-2330
2 71105E
10/30
11/05
10117/9t,
Reimb/Leag COnf 10/14
6.00
*001-4096-2330
5 71105F
10/.30
11,05
10/17;a6
ReimbliCSC Conf 9/25
70.10
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
76.10
Virgil s Mobil Service
Virgils
*101-4090-2'310
1 71105F 03/4661
10/30
11/05
10/4/a,
Sept Fuel Charges
59.50
*601-4310-rKO
1 11105F 04/4661
10i30
11105
10/4/6
Sept Fuel Charges
50.03
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
109.53
Vu, Tinh
VuTinh
*001-2300-1013
1 71105E
10/30
11/05
0.30274
Dep Refund/TSF: 96-10
100.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
100.00
Walnut Vly Water Dist
WVWaterDis
fi33-45_"3-2126
: 71105F
10/30
ilf+
°/2'f''h
Wtr Svcs -LEAD 33
251.27
X133-45:33-2126
4 'l- 5F
11/:X+
11;05
9/27/96
Wtr Svcs-LLAD 381.03b.53
X
1 10`F
10/'3
3
3
207.h113.-4508-212
*1_c,-45310,-2126
2 Ii,o5F
20 30
11105
9/30/96
Wtr Svcs-LLAD 33
27.76
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,523.16
Welders Warehouse
WeldersWar
1+)1-4310-1200'
2 71105E 02/4940
10/30
11/05
43503
Welding Supplies
54.1a
#001-4310-6250
2 71105F 01/4940
10/30
11/05
43503
Wire Feed Welder
595. LS
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
14'?.47
%est End Uniforms
ti �i ;1-4415-1::i+0
WestEndUni
2 71105F 01/4731A 10/30 11/05 425::: Unfrms-V1trPtrl/Sept 1+13.44
West Publishing Co. WestPub
*)01-4090-2320 2 71105F 01/4513
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) i':+'=.44
10/30 11/05 37140°06 CA CD An V23,Pts 1-3 70.20
TC"AL DUE VENDOR --------) 110.20
.c
74 .'_ ............. .
VEN:,UR NHMt
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO &TCH PC.LINE(NO. EN -i'- Y;iiLE INVOICE Dt CPIF'IIGN AMOUNT DATE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whiting, Linda
Wh:tingL
*(n)1-3472
1 71105D
1?:
i1;05
Recreation Refund-Ercur4n
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
107.00
Williams, Michelle
169
*001-3478
34 71105A
10/29
11/05
19611
Recreation Refund
31.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
31.00
Wilson, Terrie
WilsonT
*001-2300-1002
8 71105F
10/30
11/05
02'993'
Sec Dep Refund
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
50.00
Wolf, Audrey
Wolf)
*001-3473
1 71105F
10/30
11/05
028919
Halloween Ezc Refund
20.00
*001-3473
2 7110,5F
10130
11/05
028919
Christmas Ezc Refund
30.00
*001-347'-3
3 71105F
10/30
11/05
028910
O6toberfest Ezc Refund
16.00
*001-3473
4 71105E
10; 3U
11/05
023919
McGill Halloween Refund
10.00
*001-3473
5 711055
10/.30
11/05
028919
McGill Christmas Ezc Refd
15.00
*001-34731
6 71105F
10130
11/05
02391'a
McGill Misc Fee/2� 5 ea.
10.00 -
*001 -3471
4 711105F
10/30
11/05
02'`,196
Laughlin Ezc Refund
73.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
17;.00
Wright, Paul
WrightP
*0G1 -4090-W)0
2 71105A 01/4599
10/29
11/0.5
AV Support -10/14, 10/15
270.00 11/05/96 0000030--3
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
270.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
Yosemite Waters
YosesWater
*001-4310-2130
8 71105F 01/4640
10/30
11/05
Sep032645
EquipRent-SycCynPrk/Oct
12.00
*1101-4310-21330
10 71105F 01/4641
10/30
11/05
Sep058292
EquipRent-HrtgPrk/Oct
7.00
*001-4314-1200
4 71105F 02/4641
10/30
11/05
Sep058292
4plies-HrtgPrk/Sep
35.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
54.50
Yuen, Mary
2172
*001-3478
37 71105A
10/29
11/05
1x538
Recreation Refund
45.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
45.00
Yueng, Sanwa
'173
*001-3478
33 71105A
10/29
11/05
19497
Recreation Refund
27.00
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------)
27.00
A
VENDOR NAME a.-__ tOR !D. PFEFHi_
ACCOUNT PRGJ.TX-NO HATCH PO.LINEINO. EN -F'` 'DUE IN, L::E I,E'S iR IP -7,-N AMOUNT tA?c
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
loia, Rlcnard 2 140
t?Cji-347t 5 71105A 10;24 11/05 195_,7 Recreation Refund :.00
TGTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 'j..00
TOTAL PREPAID -----------) 1'20,333.44
TOTAL DUE --------------- 591.756.73
TOTAL REPORT ------------? 71"-2,6?0.17
" - - 21UPIE I ---JE 4.-L� -,jE
�lz IS - - � :
FiNI,C ;, L I-IRECT P 7
; EV E E REVENUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GeneraI Rini
601,7-1.-16 1-34 _, 7-
, i
LLH -D CQ -ind
-7.
L5
25. C.I.P. Funcl
RILN
'71"L
I -j Fund
7�7-4
7 p
Librar, '-Eryice
'N
115 Int Waste Mgmt F
342'.15
342.15
i!,13 Air Quality Imp
.:b.'_U
0 -1 6.00
CL,[-:
H^'._ .............
1
141 LLAD 441 Fund
" - - 21UPIE I ---JE 4.-L� -,jE
�lz IS - - � :
FiNI,C ;, L I-IRECT P 7
; EV E E REVENUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GeneraI Rini
601,7-1.-16 1-34 _, 7-
, i
LLH -D CQ -ind
-7.
L5
25. C.I.P. Funcl
I -j Fund
7�7-4
It- Prop A -Transit F
Librar, '-Eryice
115 Int Waste Mgmt F
342'.15
342.15
i!,13 Air Quality Imp
.:b.'_U
0 -1 6.00
138 LLAB f3l,0 Fund
4,QS4.4.
4,984.42
141 LLAD 441 Fund
:,y84.08
C,,?84.080
TOTAL------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
ALL FUNDS 141,064.03 2,433.00 569,123.14
TO: City of Diamond Bar
ATTENTION: Tommye Nice, Deputy City Clerk
5
October 21, 1996 S% Q
RE: Claim Phadungslip v. City of Diamond Bar
Claimant Chairit Phadungslip
D/Event 4/14/96
Rec'd Y/Office 10/11/96
Our File S 87656 SWQ
We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated
below:
• CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.
Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions
please contact the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
CARL WARREN & COMPANY
Dwight J. Kunz
cc: SCJPIA w/enc.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS
750 The City Drive • Ste 400. Orange, CA 92868
Mail- P.O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180
Phone: (714) 740-7999 Ext. 140 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax (714) 740-9412
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not r
later than ( r,os. after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec 911.2)
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year atter thet {'
occurrence. ( Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) C �y�: '1
3. Read entire claim before filing. j'J
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident_
5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a)
To: The City of Diamond Bar
Mame of Claimant
CHAIRIT PHADUNGSLIP
Home Address of Claimant City and State
1117 Bramford Court, Diamond Bar, California 91789
Business Address of Claimant City and State
Age of Claimant cif natural person)
48
Home Telephone Number
(909) 860-1595
Business Telephone Number
Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claire:
GERALD H. NELSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Union Bank Tower, Suite 1040,
500 South Main Street, Orange, California 92668 (714) 558-1225
How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. ^
Claimant was on Grand Avenue in Diamond Bar and fell in debris from trees in back
of property located at 1349 Crestmont Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
W -hen did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day:
Sunday, April 14, 1996 at approximately 8:00 P.M.
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
street names and addresses and measurements from landmarks:
Sidewalk in back of property located at 1349 Crestmont Drive,
Diamond Bar.
What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give naines of City employees causing the injury of
damage, if known:
Sidewalk, public property, was littered with leaves and other unknown debris. -
Created a hazard to myself and other persons using the public thoroughfare.
What DAML?GE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed:
Received injuries to face, hands and knees. Sutures were required to right eye.
Have had to be evaluated by a plastic surgeon for injureis to right eye and face.
Glasses were broken in the fall.
What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis c
computation: TOTAL MEDICAL INCURRED: $1,451-00
Pomona Valley Hospital $980.00 Frederick Berkowitz, M.D. $150.00
Helena Kim, O.D. $ 45.00 Fedco — Glasses $225.00
Peter H. Chung, M.D. $ 51.00
Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis
computation:
Future Medical $1,450.00
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SII
Ins ar. e paycients received, if any, and names of Insurance Company:
None
Expenca. es rr.aae on account of accident or in;ury: (Date — Item) (Amount
Pomona Valley Hospital $980.00 Frederick Berkowitz, M.D. $150.00
Helena Kim, O.D. $ 45.00 Fedco $225.00
Peter H. Chung, M.D. $ 51.00
Name an:: ac --r ess of Witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals:
Julie Phadungslip, 1117 Bramford Court, Diamond Bar, California 91789
READ CAREFULLY
For a'! accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate plapa
acc!cent --y "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners.
C.ty e'nc:e was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yoursel-
or ..o -r %eh: -:e %+hen you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or you:
V en:L:e at the time of the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X."
ti C : :f �4.a;: anis below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant.
FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS
C UR9—S
FOR OTHER AC IDENTS
0 f,
SIDE
WAL„K
PARKWAY
SIDEWALK
x -
Signature f Claimant or person filing on his behalf giving
relatio p to C1.irpaqt'
Typed Name:
GERALD H. NELSON
CURS-}
Date
10/11/96
TO: City of Diamond Bar
I
October 22,199(1 Q C T 2 111
ATTENTION: Tommye Nice, Deputy City Clerk
RE: Claim
Rich v. City of Diamond Bar
Claimant
Samuel Rich
DBvent
23 -Apr -96
Recd Y/Office
18 -Oct -96
Our File
S-87660 SWQ
We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated
below:
• CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.
Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions
please contact the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
CARL WARREN & COMPANY
Dwight J. Kurz
cc: SCJPIA w/enc.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS
750 The City Drive • Ste 400 • Orange, CA 92868
Mad. P O Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180
Phone (714) 740-7999 Ext 140 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax (714) 740-9412
i
1 THOMAS M. McGREAL, ESQ.
Bar No. 128152
2 LAW OFFICES OF BENTLEY & McGREAL
301 West Mission Boulevard
3 Pomona, California 91766-1688
4 Telephone: (909) 623-8683
5
6 Attorneys for Claimant: SAMUEL RICH
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
i[]
1 1 SAMUEL RICH, ) CASE NO.
12 Claimant, ) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
13 vs. } (910 GOVERNMENTAL CLAM
14 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, STATE OF)
CALIFORNIA, CAL -TRANS, )
15 )
Respondent. )
16 )
17
18 TO: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CAL -TRANS:
19 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED that SAMUEL RICH, whose address is 21322 Cold Spring
20 Lane, Diamond Bar, California 91765, claims losses for personal injury and emotional distress in the
21 amount of $1,000,000.00 computed as of the date of the presentation of this claim.
22 This circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows:
23 On or about April 23, 1996, Claimant was walking southbound on Diamond Bar Boulevard in
24 a safe and prudent manner, in the city of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, when he tripped over
25 an irregularity in the side walk and fell on hid face, resulting in serious physical injury.
26
27
28 ///
1
1 All Notices and Communications with regard to this claim should be sent to the Law Offices of
2 Bentley & McGreal, 301 West Mission Boulevard, Pomona, California, 91766; (909) 623-8683 or (909)_
3 620-5000.
4 DATED: October 14, 1996 LAW OFFICES OF BENTLEY & McGREAL
5
6 Ik ' K" --&UOLQ
THOMAS M. McGREAL
7 Attorneys for Claimant
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0. � �
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 5,1996 REPORT DATE: October 31, 1996
FROM: Kellee A. Fritzal, Assistant to the City Manager
TITLE: "Resolution 96 - 53A- A Resolution of the City of Diamond Bar setting forth personnel rules
and regulations regarding the payment of salaries, sick leave, vacations, leaves of absences
and other regulations" and budget adjustment
SUMMARY: Due to adjustments to several allocated positions and their job responsibilities , itis proposed
that these positions be modified and a new position of a part-time Transportation Clerk be
created. The position changes include the reduction of one Administrative Assistant position
from full-time to 30 hours per week; the increase in the Planning Technician position from
30 hours a week to full-time; the addition of one Administrative Intern position in the City
Manager's Office and the creation of a part-time Transportation Clerk position with salary
range. The Transportation Clerk position will be funded through the Proposition A - Transit
Passes project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the position modifications and the
new proposed Transportation Clerk position, approve the budget adjustment for the
personnel adjustments and adopt Exhibit A and B of Resolution 96-53 A.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification
_ Ordinance(s) X Other: Budqet Adiustment, Position
Allocation Chart
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been
NIA _ Yes
_ No
reviewed by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote? N/A
NIA _ Yes
_ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
NIA —Yes
No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ Yes
X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
I �11'i
Terrence L.Bel g r
City Manager
Frank M. Usher
Assistant City Manager
X Yes _ No
Finance, Community
Development, Public Works
' Kellee A. Fritzal
Assistant to the City Manager
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: "Resolution 96-53A - A resolution of the City of Diamond Bar setting forth personnel rules and
regulations regarding the payment of salaries, sick leave, vacations, leaves of absences and
other regulations" and budget adjustment
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Should the recommended adjustments in the Personnel Positions be approved, including the creation of a part-time
Transportation Cleric.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the position modifications and the new proposed Transportation
Clerk position, approve the budget adjustment for the personnel adjustments and adopt Exhibit A and B of Resolution
96-53 A.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The required budget adjustments consist of: Reduction of $8,950 in Account 4553 - Traffic & Transportation budget;
Increase of $7,300 in Account 112 - Proposition A fund; Increase of $9,870 in Account 4210 Planning Department
budget; and Increase of $11,800 in Account 4030 - City Manager Department
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:
Administrative Assistant Position - The Administrative Assistant in the Engineering Department, Tseday Aberra, has
entered into her clinical psychological doctoral program at Azusa Pacific University. Due to this new endeavor, Ms.
Aberra has requested a reduction in working hours from full-time to 75%, 30 hours a week.
Transportation Clerk Position - This position would be funded through Proposition A - Transit Passes. The
Transportation Clerk will work approximately one to two weeks per month, when the bus passes are being sold. The
Transportation Clerk will be able to devote the necessary time to assist the public in the selling of the passes,
prepare the required reports and track the cash and receipts.
Planninq Technician Position - The Community Development Department created a 75%, 30 hours a week, Planning
Technician to replace two (2) 20 -hour interns. To better assist the Community Development Department in the
processing of development projects and assist in the Engineering Department, due to the reduction of hours of the
Engineering Administrative Assistant, the Planning Technician is recommended to be increased to full-time. The
Planning Technician will assist at the front counter, prepare Planning commission reports and analyze planning
codes, in addition, the Planning Technician will assist the Engineering Department in the absences of the
Administrative Assistant.
Administrative Intern Position - The Administrative Intern position would be in the City Manager's Office. The Intern
will assist in studies, surveys and other appropriate projects.
City of Diamond Bar
Personnel Summary
Fiscal Year 1996.97
FULL TIME
POSITION
Approved
Actual
Proposed
City Manager
1
1
1
Assistant City Manager
1
1
1
Community Develop. Director
1
1
1
Community Services Director
1
1
1
City Clerk
1
1
1
Accounting Manager
1
1
1
Deputy Public Works Director
1
1
1
Assistant to City Manager
1
1
1
Senior Planner
1
1
1
Senior Engineer
0
0
0
Associate Planner
0
0
0
Senior Accountant
1
1
1
Supt. of Parks & Maint.
1
1
1
Secretary to City Manager
1
1
1
Administrative Assistant
2
2
1
Community Relations Officer
1
1
1
Deputy City Clerk
1
1
1
Administrative Secretary
3
3
3
Secretary
0
0
0
Assistant Planner
1
1
1
Assistant City Engineer
1
1
1
Planning Technician
0
0
1
Code Enforcement Officer
1
1
1
Maintenance Worker II
1
1
1
Community Services Coordinator
1
1
1
Clerk Typist
1
1
1
Totals
25
25
25
PART TIME
191**1[d'L1
Administrative Assistant
0
0
1
Account Clerk
1
1
1
Clerk Typist
1
1
1
MIS Assistant
1
1
1
Planning Technician
1
1
0
Community Service Coordinator
1
1
1
Transportation Clerk
0
0
1
Comm. Serv. Leader II
2
2
2
Comm. Serv. Leader 1
1
1
1
Parks Maintenance Helper
5
4
5
Engineering Intern
1
1
1
Planning Intern
0
0
0
Administrative Intern
1
1
2
Totals
15
14
17
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 53 A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL
RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, SICK
LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES, AND OTHER REGULATIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR HEREBY RESOLVES,
ORDERS, AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to the efficient operation and
management of the City that rules and regulations be maintained prescribing sick leave, vacation,
leaves of absences, and other regulations for the employees and officers of the City; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time to establish comprehensive wage and salary
schedules and to fix the rates of compensation to be paid to officers and employees of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
California, as follows:
SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE WAGE AND SALARY PLAN
There is hereby established a Comprehensive Wage and Salary Plan for employees of the City of
Diamond Bar. The Comprehensive Wage and Salary Plan is designed to provide for a fair and
efficient framework for the administration of wages and is based upon the recommendations of the
City Manager.
SECTION 2. SALARY SCHEDULE
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 21 (1989), the Diamond Bar City Council hereby establishes the salaries
and the various full-time positions of the City of Diamond Bar. As of the pay period which is paid
on November 22, 1996, the compensation of the various classes of positions shall be as shown on
Schedule A and B (attached).
SECTION 3. FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE GUIDELINES
New employees shall be hired at the entry step or any step at the discretion of the City Manager and
must successfully complete a one year probation period. At the end of six months, the employee will
be given a performance evaluation and may be eligible for the next step. Every year thereafter,
employees shall be given a performance evaluation and shall move to each successive step, so long
as the employee's performance is satisfactory or above.
RESOLUTION 96-53 A
Page Two
SECTION 4. PROBATION
In an effort to monitor newly -hired employees, the probation period for newly -hired employees is one
year.
SECTION 5. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Private automobiles are not to be used for the City business except as authorized. The City Manager
may authorize such use at the reimbursement rate equal to that set forth by the Internal Revenue
Services. Payments shall be based upon the most direct route to and from the destination, and garage
and parking expenses shall be paid in addition to the current rate, upon submission of paid receipts.
SECTION 6. HEALTH, DENTAL, VISION, LIFE, LONG TERM DISABILITY AND
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE.
All full-time employees and designated permanent part time employees are eligible to receive group
health, dental, vision, life, deferred compensation, disability insurance and unemployment insurance
within the City's group insurance carrier(s), with the administrative cost and premiums paid by the
City to a maximum established in Section 7 after 30 days of employment. Dependents of employees
are eligible for health, dental and vision insurance.
SECTION 7. FRINGE BENEFIT PACKAGE
An employee benefit program is authorized wherein all officers, full-time employees and designated
permanent part-time have a choice of medical and/or fringe benefits, as described in Section 6, in an
amount not to exceed $570.00 a month, paid by the City.
A. Employees, defined as Management, shall receive an additional $30.00 per month to be applied
as described in Section 6.
B. All employees shall participate in the Life, Dental and Vision Insurance programs. The City shall
pay the cost of the employee in addition to the benefit program described in Section 6 or Section
7(A). Monies in excess of the City's 457 Plan may be paid off annually, during each December.
C. All eligible employees may participate in the City's 401(A) deferred compensation plan.
SECTION 8. PART-TIME HOURLY RANGE CHART
Hourly compensation for the various part-time positions shall be as set forth in Schedule B (attached).
RESOLUTION 96-53 A
Page Three
SECTION 9. STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT
All employees serve under the City Manager, pursuant to Government Code Section 34856. Per
Government Code Section 36506, nothing in these rules and regulations shall be construed to provide
employees with any tenure or property interest in employment.
SECTION 10. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM - DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
The City of Diamond Bar shall pay the employee contribution of said employee salary to the State
Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) as deferred income.
SECTION 11. PAY PERIODS
The compensation due to all officers and employees of the City shall be on a bi-weekly basis.
SECTION 12. PAY DAYS
Warrants or checks in the payment of compensation shall be made available by the City to employees
and officers of the City on the Friday succeeding the close of any given pay period. In an event that
pay day falls on a holiday, all warrants or checks in payment of compensation shall be made available
to the City employee on the last work day preceding the holiday.
SECTION 13. WORKING HOURS AND OVERTIME
A. Eight (8) hours, exclusive of lunch period, shall constitute a day's work for all full time
employees.
B. The official work week of the City of Diamond Bar shall be five (5) working days of eight (8)
hours each. It shall be the duty of each Department Manager to arrange the work of their
Department so that each employee therein shall not work more than five (5) days in each
calendar week. The City Manager may require an employee to temporarily perform service in
excess of five (5) days per week when public necessity or convenience so requires.
C. Whenever an employee, other than an Administrative/Executive employee, shall be required to
work overtime, beyond 40 hours per week, such person shall receive compensation for such
overtime worked at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the regular rate of pay, provided they have
completed a full 40 hour work week.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Four
D. Any full time employee, other than an Administrative/Executive employee, who is required to
work on an observed holiday beyond the regular 40 hour work week, shall be entitled to pay at
the rate of two (2) times the regular rate of pay provided they have worked a 40 hour work
week.
E. There is nothing contained within this Section to exclude the City from implementing a 4-10
Plan, at their option.
SECTION 14. ANNUAL VACATION
YEARS OF SERVICE
1 - 5 10 days
6-10 15 days
11 & Up 20 days
VACATION ACCRUAL
A. A full time employee, after twelve (12) months continuous service with the City of Diamond Bar,
shall be entitled to a vacation of ten (10) work days per year to be accrued at a rate of 3.08 hours
per pay period.
B. Vacation time maybe accumulated to a maximum of twenty (20) days (160 hours). The City
Manager may approve vacation time accruals exceeding twenty (20) days.
C. The total vacation allowance shall be computed to the nearest whole day, based upon the number
of full months of City service.
D. In the event one or more municipal holidays follow accumulated vacation leave, such days shall
not be charged as vacation leave and the vacation leave shall be extended accordingly for those
employees eligible for such holidays.
E. An employee shall take vacation at such time during the calendar year based upon due regard to
the needs of the employee's services and the work schedule.
F. Vacation shall be taken during the year following which the vacation privilege has been earned.
G. The time set for the vacation of the City Manager shall be subject to the approval of the City
Council.
H. Employees who terminate shall be paid the salary equivalent to all accrued vacation earned after
one (1) year of service has been completed, prior to the effective date of termination.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Five
SECTION 14. ANNUAL VACATION (CONT'D)
I. All vacation requests shall be made at least five (5) days in advance and prior approval must be
given by employee's supervisor and department head.
J. If an employee does not request time off in advance and simply does not show up for work, the
City Manager may deny the use of vacation time or other benefit for the time off, and said
employee is subject to disciplinary action including discharge.
K. Management employees, for the purpose of accrual, shall be credited with previous municipal
experience, up to five (5) years of service.
SECTION 15. SICK LEAVE
A. Sick leave with pay shall be accrued by full-time employees at a rate of 3.08 hours per pay
period.
B. After six (6) months of continuous service, the employee is eligible to use sick leave.
C. Unused sick leave may be accumulated to a maximum total not to exceed 160 hours. Absence
or illness may not be charged to sick leave if not already accrued and/or accumulated.
D. Each full time employee shall be paid one-half (1/2) of the unused balance of the annually
accrued sick leave, accrued during a given accrual year, when the then annual accrual results in
sick leave in excess of the maximum allowable accumulation of 160 hours. The sick leave
payout shall only apply to the amount which is in excess of the maximum allowable accumulated
amount of 160 hours. The annual accrued sick leave, over the maximum accumulation, shall be
paid once a year, at the employee's current wage at the time of payment. Said payment is to be
made on the first day in December, or at such other time as the City Manager may determine,
at his/her absolute discretion, as appropriate.
E. Sick leave shall be allowed only in case of necessity and actual sickness or disability of the
employee or dependent family members, as determined by the City Manager. In order to receive
sick leave with pay, the employee shall notify the department head prior to or within two (2)
hours after the time set for beginning daily duties. The City Manager may, if he/she deems
necessary, require the employee to file a Physician's Certificate or a Personal Affidavit stating
the cause of absence.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Six
SECTION 15. SICK LEAVE (CONT'D)
F. Sick leave shall not accrue to any employee for any month in which that employee is on unpaid leave
and does not work a minimum of ten (10) eight (8) hour working days in any one month or
combination thereof.
G. If an employee does not show up for work and does not call in within two hours, the City Manager
may deny use of sick leave for the unauthorized time of, and employee is subject to disciplinary
action.
H. Employees using all accumulated sick leave may be deemed to have abandoned their employment.
After five (5) years of service, when an employee retires, resigns or terminates in good standing,
that employee will be paid all accumulated sick leave at a rate of one-half (1/2) of the employee's
current rate of pay at his/her date of termination.
SECTION 16. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
When circumstances are such and the City Manager determines that conditions warrant, three (3) paid
bereavement leave days may be granted in the event of death of a relative of a full-time employee.
"Relative" is defined as spouse, parents, children, step -children, brother, sisters, grandparents,
grandchildren, half-brothers, half-sisters, aunts, uncles, or other individuals related by blood or marriage.
SECTION 17. UNAUTHORIZED LEAVE
If an employee does not show up for work for three consecutive work days without notifying said
employee's supervisor or department head, said employee shall be considered to have voluntarily
terminated employment with the City.
SECTION 18. ON-THE-JOB INJURY
Whenever a person is compelled to be absent from employment with the City on account of injury arising
out of or in the course of that employee's employment as determined by the Workers' Compensation Act,
the employee may elect to apply pro -rated accrued sick leave, if any, to such absence to receive
compensation of an amount of the difference between the compensation received under the Workers'
Compensation Act and that employee's regular pay, not to exceed the amount of the employee's earned
sick leave. An employee in such instance may also elect to use any earned vacation time in like manner
after sick leave is exhausted. The City will pay the employee up to three (3) days of that employee's
regular salary as it relates to an on-the-job injury and if not covered by Workers' Compensation.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Seven
SECTION 19. JURY DUTY
If a full-time employee is called for jury duty, such person shall receive regular pay while actually
performing jury service, however, any amount received by such employee as payment for services as
juror shall be reimbursed to the City. All mileage paid to the employee as a juror shall not be considered
as a reimbursable item to the City.
SECTION 20. ATTENDANCE
Full time employees shall be in attendance at their work in accordance with the rules regarding hours of
work, holidays, and leave. Departments shall keep attendance records of all employees. Absence of any
employee without leave may result in possible disciplinary action including discharge.
SECTION 21. HOLIDAYS
A. Holidays which fall on Saturday shall be observed on the preceding Friday, and holidays which fall
on Sunday shall be observed on the following Monday. Paid holidays are only for the observed
days.
B. The City of Diamond Bar's observed paid holidays are as follows:
1. New Year's Day (January 1)
2. Washington's Birthday (observed the third Monday in February)
3. Memorial Day (observed the last Monday in May)
4. Independence Day (July 4)
5. Labor Day (observed first Monday in September)
6. Veteran's Day (November 11)
7. Thanksgiving Day
8. Day following Thanksgiving Day
9. Christmas Eve (December 24)
10. Christmas Day (December 25)
11. Two (2) Floating Holidays
SECTION 22. FLOATING HOLIDAYS
A. Each full time employee is allowed two (2) floating holidays (8 hours each) per calendar year,
January through December.
B. Floating Holidays are not cumulative and must be used during the above period or said employee
will lose the allocated hours.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Eight
SECTION 22. FLOATING HOLIDAYS (CONT'D)
C. Each employee must submit a request in advance, and approval must be given by the employee's
supervisor and department head.
D. A full time employee is eligible to use a floating holiday after 30 days of continuous employment.
E. Floating Holidays maybe used in lieu of sick leave only if all other benefit time has been exhausted.
SECTION 23. TRAINING PLAN
The City Manager and employees of the City are eligible to request specialized training in the form of
symposiums, special courses, forums, etc., at the City's expense.
SECTION 24. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of absence without pay may only be granted by the City Manager.
SECTION 25. RESIGNATION
An employee wishing to terminate employment in good standing shall file a written resignation with the
City Manager stating the effective date and reasons for leaving, at least two (2) weeks prior to the
resignation. Failure to give such notice shall mean the employee did not terminate in good standing,
unless by reason of hardship and upon that employee's request, the City Manager has waived the two
week notice requirement.
SECTION 26. ANTI -NEPOTISM PROVISION
A. Relatives of those listed below may not be employed anywhere in the City organization:
1. City Councimembers;
2. Standing Board and Commission members;
3. Administrative/Executive employees of the City;
4. Employees of the City Manager's Department; or
5. Employees of the Personnel Department.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Nine
SECTION 26. ANTI -NEPOTISM PROVISION (CONTD)
B. The employment of a relative within a department is prohibited when they:
1. Perform joint duties;
2. Share responsibility of authority;
3. Function in the same chain of command; and
4. Work on the same shift at the same work site.
C. For business reasons of supervision, safety, security or morale, the City may refuse to place one
spouse under the direct supervision of the other spouse.
D. For business reasons of supervision, safety, security or morale, an employer may refuse to place
both spouses in the same department, division, or facility if the work involves potential conflicts of
interest or other hazards greater for married couples than other persons.
E. "Relative" means child, step -child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, half-brother, half-
sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, parent -in-law, brother -in law, sister-in-law, or another individual
related by blood or marriage.
F. "Employee" means any person who receives a City paycheck for services rendered to the City.
SECTION 27. NON-DISCRIMINATION
The City of Diamond Bar does hereby affirm to adopt and support a policy of non-discrimination with
regard to all phases of personnel recruitment, selection and appointment.
The City further declares that it will not exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject
to discrimination any person on the basis of race, religion, nationality, sex, age or handicap, thereby
affirming the City of Diamond Bar's posture as an equal opportunity employer.
SECTION 28. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPEALS PROCEDURES
It is the intent of the City to offer fair and equitable appeals procedures for employee's performance
evaluations. Below are the official guidelines.
A. Employee and supervisor meet to review and discuss the employee's performance evaluation.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Ten
SECTION 28. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPEALS PROCEDURES
(CONT'D)
B. The employee may respond in writing to the contents of the evaluation. This response must
be submitted to the department head within five (5) working days immediately following the
evaluation.
C. The department head, as the reviewing official, shall respond in writing to the employee
within five (5) working days. This response becomes an official part of the evaluation.
D. If the employee chooses to continue to appeal following the response from the reviewing
official, the employee must submit an additional written response to the Personnel Director
within five (5) working days after receipt of the reviewing official's response.
E. The Personnel Director shall review the evaluation appeal within five (5) days with the
employee, supervisor and department head. Every effort will be made at this level to resolve
the appeal.
F. If the matter is not settled, a written appeal may be submitted tot he City Manager by the
employee within five (5) working days following the decision rendered in writing by the
Personnel Director.
G. The City Manager shall review the appeal with the employee, supervisor, department head
and Personnel Director. The decision shall be rendered in writing within five (5) working
days by the City Manager and shall be final.
SECTION 29. POST OFFER PHYSICAL EXAMS
All individuals who become a candidate for City employment must successfully pass a post -offer
physical and substance abuse exams and are subject to fingerprinting and a background investigation.
The candidates being considered for employment will be sent to a City authorized physician at the City's
expense.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Eleven
SECTION 30. EMERGENCY CALL -OUT POLICY
The following Emergency Call -Out Policy shall be adhered to:
A. When a full time employee, other than an Administrative/Executive employee, is called out
for a City emergency, the employee shall be given a minimum of two hours pay, regardless
of the amount of time it takes to rectify the problem.
B. The employee shall be paid overtime per Section 13.
SECTION 31. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
Administrative/Executive employees are allowed two (2) days of administrative leave per fiscal year.
Additional days of leave may be authorized by the City Manager, based on the number of total hours the
individual works over and above 40 hours per week.
A. Administrative/Executive employees do not receive paid overtime, and this leave is to
recognize those employees who work over and above 40 hours per week.
B. Following is a list of Administrative/Executive positions:
Accounting Manager
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Assistant to the City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant Civil Engineer
Assistant Planner
Associate Engineer
Associate Planner
City Clerk
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
Community Relations Officer
Deputy Public Works Director
Director of Community Development
Director of Community Services
Secretary to the City Manager
Senior Accountant
Senior Engineer
Senior Planner
Superintendent of Parks & Maintenance
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Twelve
SECTION 31. ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE (CONT'D)
C. Administrative leave may not be accumulated and carried over to the following year. It must be
used by June 30 of each fiscal year. Leave may be granted in hourly increments. Requests shall be
submitted to employee's immediate supervisor for approval, then forwarded to the City Manager
for approval. Administrative leave will be authorized at the convenience of the City and the work
schedule.
SECTION 32. MEDICARE
Pursuant to Revenue Billing 86-68 of the Internal Revenue Code, all employees hired after March 31,
1987 will have 1.45 percent of their base salary deducted from their paycheck to be paid to Medicare.
The City will match the 1.45 percent as mandated by law.
SECTION 33. IM[MIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986
In compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, all new employees must verify
identity and entitlement to work in the United States by providing required documentation.
SECTION 34. EXTENDED BENEFITS - COBRA
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) provides for the continuation
of health care coverage to certain employees who terminated employment and beneficiaries of
employees who die, become disabled or are divorced. Employees become eligible for continued
coverage upon termination of service, whether voluntary or not (other than termination for gross
misconduct), retirement or reduction in hours worked. For these employees and their dependents,
continued coverage is available for 18 months, at their expense.
SECTION 35. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
Subject to Council fiscal year budget authorization, each employee shall be entitled to reimbursement
in the amount of $500 per fiscal year, for college -level or university -level educational courses (including
tuition and related books), which have been approved by the personnel Officer or his/her designate as
being job-related and of value to the City. Reimbursement under this Section is contingent upon the
verification of the attainment of a letter grade of "C" or better, or in those cases where no letter grade
is given, verification of completion of the course with a "Pass" or "Credit" grade and submittal of a
receipt for registration bearing the name of the course, for which reimbursement is being requested. In
the case of reimbursement for books for any approved/verified course; a syllabus, course reading list or
course outline showing the book as being required for the course, plus a receipt bearing the title of the
book shall be submitted.
RESOLUTION 96 - 53 A
Page Thirteen
SECTION 36. PART TIME EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
Effective July 1, 1991, part time, seasonal and temporary employees will be covered by a retirement
system, under Social Security (OASDI). An employee's contribution rate shall be 6.2% on wages up
to $61,200. The employer's tax rate is the same. Election workers and emergency workers are excepted
from coverage, under this section.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS day of , 1995
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on
the day of , 1996, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1996, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
LYNDA M. BURGESS,
City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1996-97
(1.6%)
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Receptionist
816
8.16
8.57
9.00
9.45
9.92
10.42
10.94
1,415.26
1,486.02
1,560.32
1,638.34
1,720.25
1,806.27
1,896.58
16,983.09
17,832.25
18,723.86
19,660.05
20,643.06
21,675.21
22,758.97
Jr. Clerk Typist
945
9.45
9.92
10.42
10.94
11.49
12.06
12.67
1,638.34
1,720.26
1,806.27
1,896.58
1,991.41
2,090.98
2,195.53
19,660.07
20,643.07
21,675.23
22,758.99
23,896.94
25,091.78
26,346.37
Community Services
947
9.52
10.00
10.50
11.02
11.57
12.15
12.76
Coordinator
1,641.47
1,723.54
1,809.72
1,900.20
1,995.21
2,094.97
2,199.72
19,697.60
20,682.48
21,716.60
22,802.43
23,942.56
25,139.68
26,396.67
Clerk Typist
1016
10.16
10.67
11.20
11.76
12.35
12.97
13.62
1,761.22
1,849.28
1,941.75
2,038.83
2,140.77
2,247.81
2,360.20
21,134.65
22,191.38
23,300.95
24,466.00
25,689.30
26,973.76
28,322.45
Account Clerk 1
1016
10.16
10.67
11.20
11.76
12.35
12.97
13.62
1,761.22
1,849.28
1,941.75
2,038.83
2,140.77
2,247.81
2,360.20
21,134.65
22,191.38
23,300.95
24,466.00
25,689.30
26,973.76
28,322.45
Adminstrative
1113
11.13
11.69
12.27
12.88
13.53
14.20
14.91
Analyst
1,929.00
2,025.45
2,126.73
2,233.06
2,344.72
2,461.95
2,585.05
23,148.05
24,305.45
25,520.73
26,796.76
28,136.60
29,543.43
31,020.60
Secretary
1117
11.17
11.73
12.32
12.93
13.58
14.26
14.97
1,936.52
2,033.35
2,135.02
2,241.77
2,353.86
2,471.55
2,595.13
23,238.28
24,400.19
25,620.20
26,901.21
28,246.27
29,658.59
31,141.52
Code Enforcement
1169
11.69
12.27
12.88
13.53
14.20
14.91
15.66
Officer
2,025.57
2,126.85
2,233.20
2,344.86
2,462.10
2,585.20
2,714.46
24,306.89
25,522.24
26,798.35
28,138.27
29,545.18
31,022.44
32,573.56
Parks Maintenance
1178
11.78
12.37
12.99
13.64
14.32
15.04
15.79
Worker H
2,042.45
2,144.57
2,251.80
2,364.39
2,482.61
2,606.74
2,737.08
24,509.41
25,734.88
27,021.62
28,372.71
29,791.34
31,280.91
32,844.95
Deputy City Clerk
1231
12.31
12.93
13.58
14.25
14.97
15.71
16.50
2,134.26
2,240.97
2,353.02
2,470.67
2,594.21
2,723.92
2,860.11
25,611.13
26,891.69
28,236.27
29,648.08
31,130.49
32,687.01
34,321.36
Administrative
1231
12.31
12.93
13.58
14.25
14.97
15.71
16.50
Secretary
2,134.26
2,240.97
2,353.02
2,470.67
2,594.21
2,723.92
2,860.11
25,611.13
26,891.69
28,236.27
29,648.08
31,130.49
32,687.01
34,321.36
Administrative
1231
12.31
12.93
13.58
14.25
14.97
15.71
16.50
Assistant
2,134.26
2,240.97
2,353.02
2,470.67
2,594.21
2,723.92
2,860.11
25,611.13
26,891.69
28,236.27
29,648.08
31,130.49
32,687.01
34,321.36
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1996-97
(1.6%)
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Management
1231
12.31
12.93
13.58
14.25
14.97
15.71
16.50
Information System
2,134.26
2,240.97
2,353.02
2,470.67
2,594.21
2,723.92
2,860.11
(MIS)Assistant
25,611.13
26,891.69
28,236.27
29,648.08
31,130.49
32,687.01
34,321.36
Engineering
1488
14.88
15.62
16.41
17.23
18.09
18.99
19.94
Technician
2,579.19
2,708.15
2,843.56
2,985.74
3,135.02
3,291.77
3,456.36
30,950.29
32,497.81
34,122.70
35,828.83
37,620.27
39,501.29
41,476.35
Planning
1488
14.88
15.62
16.41
17.23
18.09
18.99
19.94
Technician
2,579.19
2,708.15
2,843.56
2,985.74
3,135.02
3,291.77
3,456.36
30,950.29
32,497.81
34,122.70
35,828.83
37,620.27
39,501.29
41,476.35
Community Relations
1488
14.88
15.62
16.41
17.23
18.09
18.99
19.94
Coordinator
2,579.19
2,708.15
2,843.56
2,985.74
3,135.02
3,291.77
3,456.36
30,950.29
32,497.81
34,122.70
35,828.83
37,620.27
39,501.29
41,476.35
Secretary to the
1601
16.01
16.81
17.65
18.53
19.46
20.43
21.46
City Manager
2,775.08
2,913.83
3,059.52
3,212.50
3,373.12
3,541.78
3,718.87
33,300.91
34,965.96
36,714.26
38,549.97
40,477.47
42,501.34
44,626.41
Assistant Civil
1601
16.01
16.81
17.65
18.53
19.46
20.43
21.46
Engineer
2,775.08
2,913.83
3,059.52
3,212.50
3,373.12
3,541.78
3,718.87
33,300.91
34,965.96
36,714.26
38,549.97
40,477.47
42,501.34
44,626.41
Assistant Planner
1601
16.01
16.81
17.65
18.53
19.46
20.43
21.46
2,775.08
2,913.83
3,059.52
3,212.50
3,373.12
3,541.78
3,718.87
33,300.91
34,965.96
36,714.26
38,549.97
40,477.47
42,501.34
44,626.41
Assistant to the
1601
16.01
16.81
17.65
18.53
19.46
20.43
21.46
City Manager
2,775.08
2,913.83
3,059.52
3,212.50
3,373.12
3,541.78
3,718.87
33,300.91
34,965.96
36,714.26
38,549.97
40,477.47
42,501.34
44,626.41
Superintendent of
1858
18.58
19.51
20.49
21.51
22.59
23.71
24.90
Parks/Maintenance
3,220.74
3,381.78
3,550.87
3,728.41
3,914.83
4,110.58
4,316.10
38,648.92
40,581.37
42,610.44
44,740.96
46,978.01
49,326.91
51,793.25
Senior Accountant
1858
18.58
19.51
20.49
21.51
22.59
23.71
24.90
3,220.74
3,381.78
3,550.87
3,728.41
3,914.83
4,110.58
4,316.10
38,648.92
40,581.37
42,610.44
44,740.96
46,978.01
49,326.91
51,793.25
Associate Planner
1946
19.46
20.44
21.46
22.53
23.66
24.84
26.08
3,373.48
3,542.15
3,719.26
3,905.22
4,100.48
4,305.51
4,520.78
40,481.72
42,505.81
44,631.10
46,862.65
49,205.79
51,666.08
54,249.38
Associate Engineer
1946
19.46
20.44
21.46
22.53
23.66
24.84
26.08
3,373.48
3,542.15
3,719.26
3,905.22
4,100.48
4,305.51
4,520.78
40,481.72
42,505.81
44,631.10
46,862.65
49,205.79
51,666.08
54,249.38
Schedule A
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1996-97
(1.6%)
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Transportation
1946
19.46
20.44
21.46
22.53
23.66
24.84
26.08
Planner
3,373.48
3,542.15
3,719.26
3,905.22
4,100.48
4,305.51
4,520.78
40,481.72
42,505.81
44,631.10
46,862.65
49,205.79
51,666.08
54,249.38
Accounting Manager
1997
19.97
20.97
22.02
23.12
24.28
25.49
26.77
3,462.30
3,635.41
3,817.18
4,008.04
4,208.45
4,418.87
4,639.81
41,547.58
43,624.96
45,806.21
48,096.52
50,501.35
53,026.41
55,677.73
Senior Planner
2092
20.92
21.97
23.07
24.22
25.43
26.70
28.04
3,626.49
3,807.81
3,998.20
4,198.11
4,408.02
4,628.42
4,859.84
43,517.85
45,693.74
47,978.42
50,377.35
52,896.21
55,541.02
58,318.07
Senior Engineer
2092
20.92
21.97
23.07
24.22
25.43
26.70
28.04
3,626.49
3,807.81
3,998.20
4,198.11
4,408.02
4,628.42
4,859.84
43,517.85
45,693.74
47,978.42
50,377.35
52,896.21
55,541.02
58,318.07
City Clerk
2172
21.72
22.80
23.94
25.14
26.40
27.72
29.10
3,764.23
3,952.44
4,150.07
4,357.57
4,575.45
4,804.22
5,044.43
45,170.79
47,429.33
49,800.80
52,290.84
54,905.38
57,650.65
60,533.18
Community Services
2259
22.59
23.71
24.90
26.15
27.45
28.83
30.27
Director
3,914.80
4,110.54
4,316.07
4,531.87
4,758.46
4,996.39
5,246.21
46,977.61
49,326.49
51,792.81
54,382.45
57,101.58
59,956.66
62,954.49
Deputy PW Director
2307
23.07
24.22
25.43
26.70
28.04
29.44
30.91
3,998.20
4,198.11
4,408.02
4,628.42
4,859.84
5,102.83
5,357.97
47,978.43
50,377.35
52,896.22
55,541.03
58,318.08
61,233.98
64,295.68
Comm. Development
2924
29.24
30.70
32.23
33.85
35.54
37.32
39.18
Director
5,067.84
5,321.24
5,587.30
5,866.66
6,160.00
6,468.00
6,791.40
60,814.12
63,854.83
67,047.57
70,399.95
73,919.95
77,615.95
31,496.74
City Eng/Public
2924
29.24
30.70
32.23
33.85
35.54
37.32
39.18
Works Director
5,067.84
5,321.24
5,587.30
5,866.66
6,160.00
6,468.00
6,791.40
60,814.12
63,854.83
67,047.57
70,399.95
73,919.95
77,615.95
81,496.74
Assistant City
3107
31.07
32.62
34.25
35.97
37.77
39.65
41.64
Manager
5,385.39
5,654.66
5,937.40
6,234.27
6,545.98
6,873.28
7,216.94
64,624.74
67,855.98
71,248.78
74,811.21
78,551.78
82,479.36
86,603.33
City Manager
8,056.00
96,672.00
acneame n
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1996-97
PART TU*IE/ HOURLY
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Comm. Svcs Leader
5.26
5.79
6.31
6.84
7.37
7.89
8.41
Community Svcs Leader II
7.37
7.89
8.41
8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Intern/Part-Time
7.37
7.89
8.41
8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Parks Mtce Helper
7.37
7.89
8.41
8.94
9.47
10.00
10.52
Transportation Clerk
8.41
8.83
9.27
9.74
10.22
10.73
11.27
Counter Clerk/Permit Tech
13.15
13.67
14.2
14.72
15.25
15.78
16.31
riTv nF- niAm()ND DAn
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996 REPORT DATE: October 30, 1996
FROM: George A Wentz, City Engineer
TITLE: ORDINANCE NO, _(1996) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR REGULATING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION AND
AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE
SUMMARY: As a co -permittee, the City of Diamond Bar is required to adoptan ordinance
and implement procedures with respectto the entry of non -storm water discharges into the
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) and submit to the County of Los Angeles by
November 28, 1996. This ordinance will provide the City with the legal authority necessary to
control discharges to and from those portions of the M34 over which the City has jurisdiction
as required by the permit, and thereby comply wQi the terms of the NPDES permit
RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe City Council approve the firstreading by title only and waive
full reading of ORDINANCE NO. _(1996) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR REGULATING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION AND
AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE,
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk s office)
X Ordinance(E) _Other:
Agreement(s)
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreementbeen
X Yes
T No
reviewed by the City Attorney
Does the reportrequire a majority vote? Majority
X Yes
No
Has environmental impactbeen assessed? NIA
_Yes
_ No
Has the reportbeen reviewed by a Commission?
_Yes
No
Which Commission? NIA
Are other departments affected by the report? NIA
_ Yes
_ No
Reportdiscussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Terrence L. Belau e Frank M. Usher e eor A. +enV�i
9
City Manager Assistant City Manager City Engineer
C;11 -j- cc3urvc,11 iii
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE N0, (1996) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR REGULATING STORM WATER AND URBAN
RUNOFF POLLUTION AND AMENDING THE DIAMOND BAR
MUNICIPAL CODE
ISSUE STATEM ENT:
To possess the legal authority necessary to control storm water and non -storm water
discharges within the City of Diamond Bar's jurisdiction.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the first reading by title only and waive full reading of
ORDINANCE NO, (1996) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULATING STCRM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION AND AMENDING THE
DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed recommendation has no financial impacton the City of Diamond Bar's FY
96-97 budget. For further information, please refer to BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION,
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Clean Water Actof 1987 established requirements for storm discharges under the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. It essentially
compels municipalities to perform a regulatory role forthe purpose ofprotecting marine
environments. In response to those requirements, the Regional Water Quality Control
Board -Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) issued a five-year perm itfor m unic 1paI storm
water discharges to Los Angeles County in June 1990. The 1990 permit required
municipalities to identify existing practices thatoperate to reduce storm water pollution
and to comply with thirteen (19) mandatory Best Ma nag em e nt Practices (BMP s), These
include activities as cleaning catch basins annually, sweeping streets on a regularbasis,
encouraging residents to clean sidewalks, and to recycle oil and properly dispose
household hazardous waste
After more than a year of negotiations with representatives of the Los Angeles County,
municipalities and the environmental community, the Regional Board issued the second
five-year NPDES permit. This perm itis setoutto address and regulate pollutants present
in storm water and non -storm water discharges onto City sidewalks, streets, and
ultimately into storm drain systems,
P-,- T --
Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution
November 5, 1996
As a co -permittee, the City of Diamond Bar is required to adopt an ordinance and
implement procedures with respectto the entry of non -storm waterdischarges into the
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) and subm itto the County by November
28, 1996.
This ordinance will provide the City with the legal authority necessary to control
discharges to and from those portions of the MS4 over which the City has jurisdiction as
required by the permit, and thereby comply with the terms of the NPDES permit.
It should be noted that Municipal NPDES Permit contemplates the development and
implementation of a Countywide Storm Water Management Plan (CSWMP) and a
Watershed Managemert Area Plan (WMAP), in which the City will be required to
participate and implement specified program elements. As program elements (i.e,
elimination of illicit connections and illicit discharges, development planning and
construction, public information and education, etc.) are being developed by the
Permitees and approved by the Regional Board, itmay be necessary to amend this
ordinance to implementsuch programs.
Prepared By: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra
and Los Angeles Countv Municipal Permittees
SUBMITTAL DATE FOR LEGAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION TO THE
REGIONAL BOARD UNDER NPDES PERMIT FOR STORM WATER
DISCHARGES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (ORDER No. 96-054, NPDES No.
CAS614001, Cl 6948)
The Program Management Section of Order No. 96-054 (Part 2.1.E.2) requires that
Permittees submit legal information to the Principal Permittee by November 28,
1996, who then submits the information to the Regional Board Executive Officer.
However, no submittal date to the Regional Board Executive Officer was provided
in the narrative provisions of the Order. As discussed between Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works staff and Regional Board staff, the information
required under Part 2.I.E.2 of the Order will be submitted to the Regional Board
Executive Officer by December 12, 1996.
If there should be any questions or comments in regard to this matter or the Permit
in general, please do not hesitate to contact Carlos Urrunaga of my staff at (213)
266-7598.
ROBERT P. GHIRELLI, D.Env.
Executive Officer
cc: Jorge Lean, State Water Resources Control Board
WD
%aRegcled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and
ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations.
Cal/EPA�1
-\ Pete Wilson
Governor
Los Angeles
F` OCT /
Regional Water
g
duality Control
October 11, 1996
1�-.
-.�
Board
CC^Tj r,1it!
iOl Centre Plaza Drive
Mr. Don Wolfe, Deputy DirectorVonterey
)1754-21 Park, ca
;'17sa-21s6
Department of Public Works
p
l j
213) 266-7500
County of Los Angelesd
'AX (213) 266-7600
900 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803-1331
and Los Angeles Countv Municipal Permittees
SUBMITTAL DATE FOR LEGAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION TO THE
REGIONAL BOARD UNDER NPDES PERMIT FOR STORM WATER
DISCHARGES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (ORDER No. 96-054, NPDES No.
CAS614001, Cl 6948)
The Program Management Section of Order No. 96-054 (Part 2.1.E.2) requires that
Permittees submit legal information to the Principal Permittee by November 28,
1996, who then submits the information to the Regional Board Executive Officer.
However, no submittal date to the Regional Board Executive Officer was provided
in the narrative provisions of the Order. As discussed between Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works staff and Regional Board staff, the information
required under Part 2.I.E.2 of the Order will be submitted to the Regional Board
Executive Officer by December 12, 1996.
If there should be any questions or comments in regard to this matter or the Permit
in general, please do not hesitate to contact Carlos Urrunaga of my staff at (213)
266-7598.
ROBERT P. GHIRELLI, D.Env.
Executive Officer
cc: Jorge Lean, State Water Resources Control Board
WD
%aRegcled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and
ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations.
CITY OF DIAMOND DAn
AGENDA REF'UR I
AGENDA NO. G -8
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996 REPORT DATE: October 24, 1996
FROM: George A. Wentz, City Engineer
TITLE: Resolution No. 96 -XX approving the installation of a red curb on the north side of
Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar Post Offices general public driveway
and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feeteasterly from curb return of the "Post Office
Trucks Unly" driveway and 15 feetwesterly from the curb return of the post
office's general public driveway
SUMMARY: The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends to the City Council
thata red curb on the north side of Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar Post Offices
general public driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feeteasterly from curb return ofthe
"Post Office Trucks Only'' driveway and 15 feetwesterly from the curb return of the post
office's general public driveway be installed. This recommendation is based on the need to
minimize the visibility restriction for Diamond Bar Post Office employees/customers,
RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe City Council adopt Resolution No 96 -XX approving the
installation of red curb on the north side of Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar
Post Office s general public driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feeteasterly from curb
return of the "PostOfPice Trucks Only'' driveway and 15 feetwesterly from the curb return of
the post offices general public driveway"
LIST OF ATTACHMElJTSX Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
X Resolutions) Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk s office)
Ordiriance(s) X Other: 9112196 T&T Rpt. & Minutes
Agreemen(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreementbeen X Yes No
reviewed by ttie Citv Attorney?
2 Does the reportrequre a rnajority vole? Majority X Yes _ No
3 Has environmental impactbeen assessed? NIA _Yes _ No
4 Has the reportbeen reviewed by a Commission? X Yes No
Which Commission? Traffic & Transportation
5. Are other deparTnents affected by the report? NIA _ Yes _ No
Reportdiscussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
I-��
err'ence L. Bela er Frank M Usher �eorge A. Wentz
City Manager , AssistantCity Manager City Engineer
nTI ' m(INCH RCr'ORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Reso iution No 96 -XX approving the installation of a red curb on the
north side of Montefinc Avenue between the Diamond Bar Post
Office s generalpublic driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15feet
easterly from curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only" driveway
and 15 feetwesterly from the curb return ofthe postoffices general
public driveway.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
To provide)enhance sightvisibility atthe entrancelex itdriveway of the Diamond Bar Post
Office on Montefino Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
Thatthe City Council adopt Resolution No, 96 -XX approving the installation ofa red curb
on the north side of Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar Post Offices general
public driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from curb return of the
"Post Office Trucks Only'' driveway and 15 feet westerly from the curb return of the post
cfFices general public driveway.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed re._ommenclation is estimated to cost the City $200,00, which will be
funded by traffic maintenance account.
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:
The Diamond Bar Post Office requested that the Ciy of Diamond Bar consider the
feasibility of installing red curbs at the office's entrance/exit driveway located on
Montefino Avenue This requestwas based on the employees 'restricted visibility when
entering/exiting the drveway on Monte�ino Avenue Staff has observed vehicles utilizing
the area in discussion for parking.
On September 1 1996, the Traffic and Transportation Commission discussed the
Diamond Bar Post Offices request to restrict parking on Montefino Avenue, The
Commission concurred with staff's recommendation to install red curbs o on the north
side of Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar Post Office's general public
driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from curb return of the "Post
Office Trucks Only" driveway grid 15 Feet westerly from the curb return of the post offices
general pubic driveway (September 12, 1996 staff report and Minutes attached) This
recommendation s, breughtbefore the City Council for approval,
Prepared By: David G. LiulTseday Aberra
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
INSTALLING A RED CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MONTEFINO
AVENUE BETWEEN THE DIAMOND BAR POST OFFICE'S GENERAL
PUBLIC DRIVEWAY AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, 15 FEET
EASTERLY FROM CURB RETURN OF THE "POST OFFICE TRUCKS
ONLY" DRIVEWAY AND 15 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE CURB RETURN
OF THE POST OFFICE'S GENERAL PUBLIC DRIVEWAY
A. RECITALS.
(i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission
considered this matter at a public hearing meeting on September 12,
1996.
(ii) At the meeting of September 12, 1996, the
Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the
installation of a red curb on the north side of Montefino Avenue
between the Diamond Bar post office's general public driveway and
Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from curb return of the
"Post Office Trucks Only" driveway and 15 feet westerly from the
curb return of the post office's general public driveway as
appropriate.
(iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission
recommends the installation of a red curb on the north side of
Montefino Avenue between the Diamond Bar post office's general
public driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from
curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only" driveway and 15 feet
westerly from the curb return of the post office's general public
driveway.
RESOLUTION.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Said action is pursuant to Section 10.16.480 of the
Diamond Bar City Code, as heretofore adopted, by the City Council;
2. The City Council hereby finds that the public
health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by the
installation of a red curb on the north side of Montefino Avenue
between the Diamond Bar post office's general --public driveway and
Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from curb return of the
"Post Office Trucks Only" driveway and 15 feet westerly from the
curb return of the post office's general public driveway as herein
prescribed;
3. This resolution shall not become effective until the
red curb on the north side of Montefino Avenue between the Diamond
Bar post office's general public driveway and Diamond Bar
Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from curb return of the "Post Office
Trucks Only" driveway and 15 feet westerly from the curb return of
the post office's general public driveway are properly installed by
the City; and
4. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby
authorize and direct the City Engineer to cause said red curbs to
be installed as herein defined be established.
1996.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ,
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved,
and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar held on day of , 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
September 12, 1996 Page 11 T&T commission
DRAFT
CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Request to red curb the entrance/exit driveway of
IV.
the Diamond Bar Post Office at Montefino Avenue.
C/Tamaya made a motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to
forward a recommendation to the City Council to
red curb the north side of Montefino Avenue
between the post office's general public driveway
and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from
curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only"
driveway, and 15 feet westerly from the curb
return of the post office's general public
driveway. Without objections, the motion was so
ordered.
VI. NEW BUSINESS - Continued to October 10, 1996.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS - None
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF:
A. Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update: Sgt. Rawlings
presented the Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update
for August, 1996. The August Enforcement Index
was 36.9.
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
XI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Traffic and Transportation Commission, C/Nice made a
motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to adjourn the meeting.
Chair/Istik adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. to
October 10, 1996.
Respectfully,
Attest:
Jack Istik
Chair
David G. Liu
Secretary
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: September 6, 1996 MEETING DATE: September 12, 1996
TO: Chairman and Members of the Traffic and
Transportation Commission
VIA: George A. Wentz, City Engineer/Director of Publi Works
FROM: David G. Liu, Deputy Director of Public Works
Tseday Aberra, Administrative Assistant`s
SUBJECT: Request to red curb the entrance/exit driveway of the Diamond Bar
Post Office at Montefino Avenue
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Diamond Bar Post Office has requested the City red curb the entrance/exit
driveway located off of Montefino Avenue. Said request is based on the need
to secure a safe visibility distance for mail carrier trucks/vans as well as
motorists who utilize the post office. According to the post office, the
vehicles which park near the Montefino Avenue driveway restrict the
visibility of the carrier trucks/van who utilize this driveway.
The Diamond Bar Post Office is located at the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Montefino Avenue. There are three
entrances/exits to the post office. Two entrances/exists are located off of
Diamond Bar Boulevard and one is located on Montefino Avenue.
A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Diamond Bar and
Montefino Avenue in the near future. At that time, parking in the vicinity
of the driveway will most likely be prohibited. The red curbing, therefore,
will compliment future signing and striping. Staff recommends the east side
of the Montefino Avenue driveway be painted red (between the post office's
driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard). On the west side of said driveway and
east side of the second driveway (accesses post office trucks only), it is
recommended 15 feet of red curb be painted. Refer to the attached aerial for
areas of red curbing. The intent of these red curbs is to provide a safe
visibility distance or those who utilize the Montefino Avenue entrance/exit
to the Diamond Bar post Office.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Traffic and Transportation Commission concur with staff's
recommendation to red curb the north side of Montefino Avenue between the
post office's general public driveway and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet
easterly from curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only" driveway, and 15
feet westerly from the curb return of the post office's general public
driveway. Furthermore, it is recommended that the Commission forward said
recommendation to the City Council.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department of Public Works
REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION AND STUDY
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONEp
DATE
Request for: ' Y^16 (J -
Description Description
t�7 n > C (- a/�-' t 11 C IPPAz C'.
"J ,1� Rfi n► � �_r�s � �- � i r -ice f -� u l� � -,�� _ c�r���a� � �.� �=x � fii�� �tR�
Pa��'U�, : cc-� ftp sc—c— erg ��•�.�� �-��.�-r�,c. �sr�rcc� �hc� .������
S �
t;"
15-1= G i t= h biA
Diagram.%' /
Submit completed forms to: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department of Public Works
21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909) 396-5671
wm�
.400
t�,
• y'1� !` t /'� Mw,r r1'.� .rj —'`,_�9L'
:r�, �` d- �-.*�1 � jai '•t
I.:.
�.•3 �. � .x,1'1" 3':
♦ ' .( i. '� � _ .Aa I.C./ _}, �liy�{Ti� .�1• �y_
' is .�� •�7 R�• �_ -, r � �.• � � -
im
IA s a yr
A pro,
44
Qv
r S 4 r •
• / i, _
Gi I7 ur UTAMUNU Uf\t-(
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA N0.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996 REPORT DATE: October 28, 1996
FROM: George A Wentz, City Engineer
TITLE: Requestfor additional construction inspection fund for Left Turn Traffic Signals
construction on Diamond Bar Boulevard/Vountaln Laurel Way, Diamond Bar Boulevard/
Golden Springs Drive, and Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive.
SUMMARY: On February 6, 1995, the City Council awarded $7,000 (not -to -exceed amount)
to Warren C, Siecke for construction inspection for Left Turn Traffic Signals construction on
Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain Laurel Way, Diamond Bar Boulevard/Golden Springs Drive,
and Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive. Due to the unforeseen removal of abandoned
traffic signal and street light foundations, damaged conduit, tim ing plans, and the need to
coordinate these issues with all affected partes, staff requests an additional $0,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe City Council approve an additional $3,000 to Warren C.
Siecke for construction inspecton for Left -Turn Traffic Signals construction on Diamond Ear
Boulevard/Mountain Laurel Way, Diamond Bar Boulevard/Golden Springs Drive, and Brea
Canyon RoadlGolaen Springs Drive.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
X Staff Report
Resolutions)
_ Ordinance(s)
— Agreement(s)
Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City
Clerk s office)
X Other: 216196 Council Report.
1 Has the resolution, ordinance or agreementbeen _
Yes
_ No
reviewed by the City Attorney? NIA
2. Does the reportrequire a majority votes X
Yes
_ No
3 Has environmental impactbeen assessed NIA _Yes
_ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Comm ission�, _
Yes
X No
Which Commission-)
5 Are other departments affected by the report? NIA _
Yes
` No
Reportdiscussed with the tollowing affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
K11- A - I
Terrence L. Belan r Frank M. Usher e rge A. Wentz
City Manager Assistant City Manager City Engineer
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November S, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for additional construction inspection fund for Left -Turn
Traffic Signals construction on Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain
Laurel Way, Diamond Bar BoulevardlGolden Springs Drive, and Brea
Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Request for additional construction inspection funding for Left -Turn Traffic Signals
construction on Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain Laurel Way, Diamond Bar
Boulevard/Golden Springs Drive, and Brea Canyon RoadlGolden Springs Drive,
RECOMMENDATION:
Thatthe City Council approve an additional $3,000 to Warren C, Siecke for construction
inspection for Left Turn Traffic Signal construction on Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain
Laurel Way, Diamond Bar Boulevard/Golden Springs Drive, and Brea Canyon
Road/Golden Springs Drive
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed recommendation will be funded by Capital Improvement Project account
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On February 6, 1996, the City Council awarded a construction contractfor left -turn traffic
signals on Diamond Bar BoulevardlMountain Laurel Way, Diamond Bar BoulevardlGolden
Springs Drive, and Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive, Concurrently, the Council
awarded Warren C Siecke a contract to perform construction inspection services in an
amount not -to -exceed $%,000.00 (see attached 2126196 staff report).
This additional cost of $3,000 is requested to address conflicts between old and new
pole foundations at the northeastand southwest corners of Brea Canyon Road/Golden
Springs Drive and at the northeast and southwest corners of Diamond Bar
Boulevard/Mountain Laurel Way, to coordinate the approval of timing plan between the
engineer and LA County, to identify previous damage to a traffic signal conduitacross
Construction Inspection
November 5, 1996
the north leg of the intersection of Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Drive, and to
coordinate additionally needed inspection schedules. The Depar nentof Public Works
wishes to issue a second purchase order to Warren C. Siecke for $0,790,00, This
amount is the sum of the remaining $800,00 (initially approved by Council on February
6, 1996) and an additional $x,990.00 (estimate given by Warren C. Siecke to complete
inspection for i ie project)
Prepared By:
David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra
TO: Terrence L. Bela
MEETING DATE: February 6, 199(
FROM: George A. Went.
TY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
;r, City Manager
REPORT DA'
City Engineer
AGENDA NO. ?.//
January 30, 1996
TITLE: Left -Turn Traffic Signals on mond Bar Boulevard at Mountain I lret Way, Golden Springs
Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard, an, 3rea Canyon Road at Golden Sprin= Drive
SUMMARY: On December 5, 199: the City Council authorized staff t, advertise for bids for the
installation of left -turn traffic signals o► )iamond Bar Boulevard at Mountain urel Way, Golden Springs
Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard, an 3rea Canyon Road at Golden Sprin,, Drive. At this time, the
City proposes to award a contract the lowest responsible bidder, aul Gardner Corporation.
Furthermore, it is recommended tha he City Council award the consm ion inspection services to
Warren C. Siecke.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recom coded that the City Council award contract to Paul Gardner
Corporation in the amount not-to-excL i $45,287.00 and authorize a contin . ncy amount of $5,000 for
project change orders to be approvec y the City Manager. Furthermore, it is recommended that the
City Council award the construction in ,ction services to Warren C. Siecke It,the amount not -to -exceed
$7,000.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff -report
Resolu ,on(s)
Ordinai tces(s) _
X Agree. ient(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
Public Hearing Notification
Bid Specification
(on file in Cir. Clerk's office)
Other:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? ` Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
R IEWED B : ,
errence L. Belanger Frank sher �AIL George A. entz
City Manager Assistant City Manager City Engineer
r \wp60\Imdakay\agen-96\"rSGardnO 130
0 01
CITY -COUNCIL REPO ZT
� ENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: February 6, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Ci Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Left -Turn Traffic Signals on Diamond B Boulevard at Mountain Laurel Way,
Golden Springs Drive at Diamond Bar Bou] ard, and Brea Canyon Road at Golden
Springs Drive
ISSUE STATEMENT:
The City proposes to award a contract for the installation of ::ft -turn traffic signals on Diamond Bar
Boulevard at Mountain Laurel Way, Golden Springs Drive at D1, mond Bar Boulevard, and Brea Canyon
Road at Golden Springs Drive to Paul Gardner Corporation the I ,)west responsible bidder. Furthermore,
the City proposes to award the construction inspection services co Warren C. Siecke.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award a contract to Paul Gardner Corporation in the amount
not -to -exceed $45,287.00 and authorize a contingency amount of $5,000 for project change orders to be
approved by the City Manager. Furthermore, it is recommended that the City Council award the
construction inspection services to Warren C. Siecke in the amount not -to -exceed $7,000.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The total allocated project budget is $88,000 of Gas Tax Fund and $22,000 of Developer's Fee. Our
engineer's estimate was $60,000.
BACKGROUND:
On December 5, 1995, the City Council authorized staff to advertise and receive bids for the installation
of left -turn traffic signals on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Mountain Laurel Way, Golden Springs Drive
at Diamond Bar Boulevard, and Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive. In response to the
advertisements, a total of thirteen (13) contractors obtained plans and specifications for the project.
3
NV
%LEFT -TURN TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AT THREE LOCATIONS
January 31, 1996
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
Formal bids were received and opened on January 3, 1996 from ten (10) firms.
The bids received were as follows:
COMPANY
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
1. Paul Gardner Corporation $45,287.00
2. C.T. & F. Inc. $45,388.00
3. Macadee Electrical Construction $46,409.00
4. California Electrical Services $48,000.00
5. Dela Cruz Construction, Inc. $49,545.00
6. L & R Electric Service Co., Inc. $49,885.00
7. Peek Traffic $51,770.00
8. TDS Engineering $55,105.00
9. Steiny and Company, Inc. $55,198.00
10. Hovey Electric, Inc. $61,854.00
The bid of $45,287.00 submitted by Paul Gardner Corporation has been determined by staff to be the
lowest responsible bid. It is anticipated that the construction will begin on March 4, 1996 and be
completed by June 4, 1996.
To ensure that the construction work will be in conformance with the City's plans and specifications for
these left -turn traffic signals, staff obtained three (3) fee proposals from the City's on-call traffic
consultants. The fees range from $6,000 to $15,600. Staff recommends Warren C. Siecke to provide
the necessary construction inspection services based on his familiarity with the City's procedures,
requirements and past performance.
Prepared By:
David G. Liu
C:\WP60\LINDAKAY\CCR-95\TS Gardner0.130
2
3
4
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR*
REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OCTOBER 15, 1996
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Werner called the meeting to order at
8:33 p.m. in the AOMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California.
ROLL CALL: Harmony, Herrera, Vice -Chairman Huff, Chairman
Werner. AMIAnsari was excused from the meeting.
Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, Executive Director; Frank Usher,
Assistant City Manager; Amanda Susskind, Assistant Agency Attorney;
James DeStefano, Community Development Director; David Liu, Deputy
Director of Public Works; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and
Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary.
The Agency Members unanimously concurred to add Public Comments to the
agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/Herrera moved, VC/Huff seconded, to
approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, VC/Huff,
C/Werner
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS - Ansari
4.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A. Regular Meeting of September 17, 1996 - approved as submitted.
B. Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 1996 - approved as
submitted.
C. Regular Meeting of October 1, 1996 - approved as submitted.
4.2 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER dated October 1, 1996 in the amount
of $5,616.94.
5. OLD BUSINESS:
5.1 PRESENTATION BY ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (ERA) OF
DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC/MARKETING RESEARCH STUDY - Dave
Wilcox, Project Manager, Economic Research Associates, presented the
D.B. Economic/Marketing Research Study. He explained that his firm's task
was to evaluate where D.B. currently stands with regard to commercial,
industrial and retail properties, to identify current economic activities and
determine the prospects for improving the economic base and business
October 15, 1996 Page 2 - Redev. Agency
activity volumes in the community. In cooperation with RSG, his firm
researched the economic blight as it may exist in the commercial and
industrial areas of the City. He indicated that D.B. is more advanced than
a number of surrounding cities. With respect to the City's competitive
region, the tax system is lower than many of the surrounding cities.
Mr. Wilcox offered the following summary: D.B. has approximately
1,200,000 sq. ft. of existing retail space occupied by about 500 tenants.
There are currently 116 vacant retail spaces (170,000 square feet - 15%
vacancy rate). The City enjoys approximately 1,100,000 sq. ft. of built floor
space for professional office. About 96,000 sq. ft. are vacant (9% vacancy).
Industrial space has the lowest vacancy factor of about 6% with 1,000,000
existing sq. ft. (north and west portion of the city) including 62,000 vacant sq.
ft. There are more than 35 acres of available developable commercial sites
(11). Nine sites are in the Gateway Corporate Center. He felt there is
substantial room for improving the potential of spendable incomes in D.B.
Mr. Wilcox stated his firm looked at the following niche markets for D.B.:
New and upgraded restaurants, specialty retail collections, combinations
(retail, dining, entertainment), conversion of available vacant building office
park pads to other uses, and crossroads retail nodes. He stressed that D.B.
wants to stimulate and serve the home-based businesses because value is
created at this level. So long as home-based businesses are not a
nuisance, they will attract the types of niche market business the City seeks.
In his opinion, the City's shopping centers are not in jeopardy so long as
they transition, self -improve and maintain the evolving goods lines. The City
needs to be proactive in working with poorly designed shopping centers to
upgrade their facilities.
He concluded that retention and transition must be simultaneous goals. D.B.
is a regionally convenient location. The range of available floor areas
provides for the kind of space startup firms are seeking. D.B. is a low
expense community to begin and operate a business within. He stressed the
need for a more energetic partnership with the City's business community.
In response to VC/Huff, Mr. Wilcox stated that his firm met with the two City
Council subcommittees: Redevelopment Agency subcommittee - VC/Huff
and C/Werner; and Economic Development subcommittee - AM/Ansari and
AM/Herrera. Redevelopment need not change the zoning as outlined in the
City's General Plan. He indicated that he does not believe it would be in the
City's best interest to go head to head with some of the big box
developments in the lower valley. He suggested that leading edge
specialized warehouses may be viable for the community.
Responding to AM/Herrera, Mr. Wilcox stated there are nine properties in
the Gateway Corporate Center that have been held primarily for office
October 15, 1996 Page 3 - Redev. Agency
development. In his opinion, the City and the developer should be engaged
in conversations about how these properties might be utilized to the benefit
of all parties for the better economic balance of the City. The property could
be moved to higher end retail and retail/dining/ entertainment. The area may
become a mixed use commercial area rather than a held off market for office
space. In addition, the main arterial of Golden Springs Dr. and Grand Ave.
offers additional opportunities.
In response to AM/Harmony, Mr. Wilcox explained that the Redevelopment
Agency should pursue development prospects which cost the agency least
and offer the greatest gain to the community such as rehab loans, public
rights-of-way improvements, and site clearance. The primary purpose for
redevelopment is economic diversification of the community. The City needs
to be proactive and deliberate in its strategy to improve shopping centers
within the City and target market potential tenants. He advised against
opening new shopping centers which would compete with the existing
businesses. The City needs to target new niche type business to fill existing
space.
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. AGENCY MEMBER COMMENTS: AM/Herrera believed the intent of the RSG
study was to imply that D.B. must compete with the bigbox shopping centers located
in the valley by attracting competing businesses. This implication did not intend
that bigbox shopping centers be built in D.B.
AM/Harmony stated he had attended a Municipal Officials for Redevelopment
Reform conference on Saturday. He pointed out that 41% of all redevelopment
monies are spent for overhead. He expressed concern that D.B. will spend money
for improvements that market forces would otherwise accomplish on their own
initiative. He is concerned that increased traffic in the community will result in
increased pollution and crime.
VC/Huff stated that Lorbeer Junior High School was not included in the
redevelopment project map because the concept of redevelopment is to strengthen
the City and not to weaken its structure. Redevelopment is a tool to economic
development. He favored proceeding carefully and yet boldly to get D.B. on a
competitive track of economic prosperity so that the City does not have to ask the
citizens for money to conduct local services.
C/Werner stated that the Redevelopment process should be studied and
implemented carefully and in accordance with the General Plan which states the
City should look at every opportunity to enhance the community to resolve issues
that present obstacles to citizen's quality of life. He believed it is important to
present all available information to the public and to discuss the matter in an open
forum. He encouraged the Agency Members and citizens to consider this matter
October 15, 1996 Page 4 - Redev. Agency
with an open mind.
CM/Belanger stated the Economic Research Associates report will be available in
written form at City Hall. The report will also be available On -Line.
8. AGENCY SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: None
9. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to
conduct, Chair/Werner adjourned the Redevelopment Agency meeting at 10:10
p.m.
Lynda Burgess, Agency Secretary
ATTEST:
Chairman
DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chairman Werner and Board of Directors
1
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson� Accounting Manager
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, November 5, 1996
DATE: October 31, 1996
Attached is the Voucher Register dated November 5, 1996 for the
Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency. The checks will be produced after
any recommendations and the final approval is received.
Payment of the listed vouchers totalling $1,289.75 is hereby
allowed from the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency Fund.
APPROVED BY:
Linda G. Magn son Gary H. Werner
Accounting Manager Chairman
Terrence L. Belanger Robert S. Huff
Executive Director Vice Chairman
,�JN TIME: 17:17 0 J S E R R E G I S T E R =BOE 1
DUE THRIU .............11 1)5r c
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. F'REFAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINEINO. ENTFY/DUE INVOICE LEELR! F11ON AMOUNT DATE CHEE�
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economics Research EconResear
*002-4110-4000 2 71105A 01/C4290
Federal Express Corp. FedExpress
¢002-4110-2120 1 71105A
10/30 11/05 11041-5 ProfSyc-Mdrket Analyses 1,280.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 1.2,80.00
10/30 11/05 592116152 Express Mall Svcs 9.75
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 9.75
TOTAL PREPAID -----------i 0.00
TOTAL DUE ---------------) 1.39.75
TOTAL REPORT ------------) 1.289.75
¢+¢ D;3mo^d sr R A
RUN TIME: :7:1' H E R F' _, S T E
FUND S U M M A R I REPORT
DUE THRL'.............I I G5i' t•
DISMSE GIL 5JE WILL POST uJE HAS POSTED
FUND TOTAL DIREST FAY REVENUE EXF'E"iSE REVENUE EXPENSE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
)U2
TOTAL
ALL FUNDS
1.--°9.75
FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
REVENUE EXFENSE
----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I,289.75 1,--'03a.75
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 11/5/96
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 shall
not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized
representative of the applicant has filed with the
Community Development Department an Affidavit of
Acceptance, thereby accepting all conditions of this
approval which Affidavit shall be filed within 15 days of
the date of approval.
2. All requirements of the Resolution, the applicable Zoning
District, the City Codes, City departmental policies,
rules and regulations of any State, Federal or local
agency with jurisdiction thereof shall be complied with
by the Applicant.
3. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) and
(c), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees
from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside,
void or annul, an approval of the City, which action is
brought within the time period provided for in Government
Code Section 66499.37.
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Provide and locate water mains, fire hydrants and fire
flows as required by Fire Department and Fire Code.
2. Fire Department access shall be extended to within 150
feet distance of any portion of structure to be built and
shown on the final map.
3. Access shall comply with Section 10.207 of the Fire Code
(all weather access).
4. Driveways shall include, as necessary, turnarounds
suitable for fire protection equipment use and shown on
the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed,
constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for
Fire Department use.
5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and
accepted prior to construction of on-site improvements.
Vehicular access must be provided and maintained
serviceable throughout construction.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 1
6. All hydrants shall be brass or bronze and conform to
current AWWA standard AC503 or approved equal. All
hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25' from a
structure.
C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall be recorded in
concert with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400. In the
event that Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400 is not
recorded, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall not be
recorded as a separate, independent tract.
2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance
with the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and plans
approved by the City Council.
3. Exterior construction activities (grading, framing, etc.)
shall be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, except that interior building
construction activities shall not be limited. All
construction equipment shall be properly muffled to
reduce noise levels. Transportation of equipment and
materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall
also be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00, Monday
through Saturday. All equipment staging areas shall be
sited on the subject property. Dust generated by
construction activities shall be reduced by watering the
soil prior to and during grading activities. Use of
reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible.
4. Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not
limited to, planning, building and school fees) at the
established rates prior to recordation of the final map
and issuance of building permits.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the
applicant/ subdivider shall prepare and submit to the
Director of Community Development for approval a "Buyers
Awareness Package" addressing VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 as
a single development, which shall include, but not be
limited to, information pertaining to geologic and
environmental issues regarding the property, freeway
noise, proximity to bus routes and oak tree preservation
issues, explanatory information pertaining to
restrictions on use of properties as necessary and
similar related matters. Applicant shall institute a
program to include delivery of a copy of said "Buyer
Awareness Package" to each prospective purchaser and
shall keep on file in the office of Applicant with copies
to the City and a receipt signed by each such prospective
purchaser indicating that the prospective purchaser has
received and read the information contained within the
"Buyer Awareness Package."
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 2
D.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the variety of
materials and colors to be used on the exteriors of
residential structures shall be approved in form and
color by the Community Development Director as a part of
the Development Review of the model homes.
7. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these
conditions and all improvements shall be completed or
bonded for, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. The use authorized by this approval shall be commenced or
construction necessary and incidental thereto shall be
started on or before the time limit specified herein and
thereafter diligently advanced on or before the (2)
second year after the expiration of City Council
approval.
9. Applicant shall pay all remaining City project review and
processing fees prior to recordation of the tract map as
required by the Community Development Director.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
1. As a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts,
the applicant shall suspend construction in the vicinity
of a cultural resource encountered during development of
the site, and leave the resource in place until a
qualified archaeologist can examine them and determine
appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant shall
comply with mitigation measures recommended by the
archaeologist and approved by the Community Development
Director.
Upon initiation of grading activities, a paleontological
grading observation schedule by a Certified
Paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in
bedrock units to further evaluate the fossil resources of
the site. Salvage operations shall be initiated and
coordinated with the project applicants if significant
concentrations of fossils are encountered.
2. Plant street trees as directed pursuant to the adopted
street tree plan in effect at the time of recordation and
approved by the City Engineer.
3. No underground utilities shall be constructed within the
drip line of any mature tree preserved on-site except as
approved by a registered arborist.
4. The mitigation monitoring program contained in EIR No.
92-1 (SCH 91081040) and approved by the City shall be
implemented and rigorously complied with. Applicant
shall deposit and maintain with the City, a fund in such
amounts required by the Director of Community Development
to defray the cost of implementation and monitoring by
City staff and consultants retained by City.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 3
5. A single, detailed landscape and irrigation plan for VTT
32400 and VTT 52203 including slope planting and model
home landscaping, shall be prepared by a licensed
landscape architect and submitted for City review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. Fence
details, tree staking, soil preparation, planting details
and an automatic irrigation system and the incorporation
of xerotropic landscaping shall be incorporated wherever
feasible. The Applicant shall pay all processing fees
associated with plan review.
6. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be
constructed in muted earth tones so as to not impart
adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow land
form slope configuration and shall not be placed in
exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in
swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face.
7. Prior to approval of a project landscape plan the
applicant shall demonstrate that the landscaping palette
for the project emphasizes the use of drought tolerant,
native plant species with low water requirements adapted
to the inland Southern California climate. Also, plants
used in perimeter or common area landscaping shall
include those which provide nectar, fruit or seeds as
food for native wildlife species. With the proper
selection and placement of native plants, the proposed
development would retain some of its natural value.
Recommended plants for landscaping include:
Big -Leaf Maple
Bigberry Manzanita
Coyote Brush
Ceanothus
Redbud
Toyon
Honeysuckle
California Sycamore
Holly -leaved Cherry
California Coffeeberry
Holly -leaved Redberry
Sugarbush
Chaparral Currant
Our Lord's Candle
California -Fuchsia
Acer macrophylla
Arctostaphylos glauca
Baccharis pilularis
Ceanothus spp.
Cercis occidentalis
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Lonicera spp.
Platanus racemose
Prunus ilicifolia
Rhamnus californica
Rhamnus ilicifolia
Rhus ovata
Ribes malvaceum
Yucca whipplei
Zauschneria californica
8. Prior to issuance of building permits, if applicable, Los
Angeles County Fire Department requirements for
development in a wildland fire area shall be incorporated
to reduce potential fire hazards. These provisions
include, but may not be limited to: (1) fire -resistive
protection of exterior walls/openings; (2) fire -retardant
roof covering; (3) fire -resistive construction for decks,
balconies and support structures; and (4) chimney screens
installed on each chimney flue.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 4
9. Project design and maintenance activities shall comply
with brush clearance programs administered by the Los
Angeles County Fire Department.
10. Prior to the initiation of construction activities,
building permits or recordation, the project applicant(s)
shall submit and the County Forester and Fire Warden
shall approve a fire hazard reduction/fuel management
plan to minimize brush fire hazards on-site. That plan
shall include, but may not be limited to: (1) use of
fire retardant construction materials; (2) brush
clearance and maintenance activities within 100 feet
surrounding individual structures; (3) irrigated planting
areas with provisions for maintenance activities; and (4)
the provision and maintenance of fire breaks.
11. In order to limit the potential threat of wildland fires,
low -fuel volume plants shall be incorporated into the
revegetative plan.
E. APPLICABLE EIR MITIGATION MEASURES
(not addressed in subsections a, b, c or d)
The following conditions are EIR mitigation measures not covered by
the tract conditions listed in subsections a, b, or c which apply
to the project site.
1. All grading, earthwork and associated development
activities shall be designed and conducted in accordance
with applicable City and County standards and shall
conform with recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Soils Engineering Investigation for Tentative Tract No.
32400, County of Los Angeles (Petra Geotechnical, Inc.,
October 18, 1988 and the subsequent report by Petra
including the area of Vesting Tentative Tract 52203, and
such other Geotechnical reports as may be prepared for
the site and/or required by the City and County.
2. The project applicant shall be financially responsible
for the following items: (1) the construction or
advancement of funds for the construction of any required
on-site drainage improvements as contained in the Master
Plan of Drainage Facilities approved by the City Engineer
and County Engineer of Los Angeles County; (2) the
construction of in -tract and off-site storm drain system
improvements; (3) prorated mitigation fees of contributed
flows and/or (4) any permits or other assessments
customarily imposed by the County Engineer.
3. Drainage shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer. The design and installation of
project drainage facilities shall be in accordance with
the flow criteria, design standards and construction
requirements of both the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works and the City of Diamond Bar.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 5
4. Prior to the approval of the final tract map, a special
maintenance district or other funding mechanism
addressing Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 and Vesting
Tentative Tract 52203 as a single entity, acceptable to
and approved by the City shall be established for the
maintenance of on-site storm drainage facilities.
Terrace and down drain will be part of the Landscape and
Lighting District. The main drainage system shall be
accepted into the Los Angeles County or City of Diamond
Bar maintenance District.
5. Prior to the initiation of grading operations, the
project applicant(s) shall obtain all applicable
construction, stormwater and NPDES permits as may be
required by the City, the County of Los Angeles and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the
discharge of urban pollutants.
6. Prior to final map approval, Brea Canyon Road shall be
constructed or bonded for, to the planned four -lane
cross-section south of Glenbrook, adjacent to the tract,
to the extent of the graded area. Plus, left -turn lanes
shall be provided at each of the two project access
points along Brea Canyon Road shall be designed to
provide adequate sight distance. Care shall be taken
that the future grades and landscaping adjacent to these
intersections, as well as all internal project
intersections, do not obstruct the necessary line -of -
sight. Applicant shall provide those dedications and
improvements, and be subject to pro -rated reimbursement.
7. With the development of the site plan for residential
components of the project, a traffic signal warrant shall
be conducted to determine if a traffic signal is
required. If warranted, a signal shall be installed by
developer at both collector road entrances off Brea
Canyon road. Applicant shall pay the prorata share of
the total cost of such signalization.
8. Construction and maintenance activities, including the
repair and maintenance of equipment, shall conform to and
comply with applicable provisions of the City of Diamond
Bar's Noise Ordinance.
9. When feasible, construction equipment shall be stored on-
site to eliminate and/or reduce heavy -equipment truck
trips.
10. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential
Lot Nos. 14 through 16, inclusively within Tentative
Tract No. 52203, the project applicant(s) shall construct
a suitable noise barrier for those properties effectively
attenuating traffic noise to levels in compliance with
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 6
City noise standards. Compliance shall be based upon the
City's acceptance of a subsequent noise study for those
properties and implementation of those measures deemed
appropriate by the City Engineer.
11. Project security features which shall be incorporated
into the final design may include: (1) residential
dwelling unit orientation which facilitates "neighborhood
involvement" activities; (2) exterior security lighting;
(3) well-designed access for police patrols to provide
optimum observations; and (4) illuminated street
addresses to ensure visibility from the street for better
patrol observation.
12. Prior to final tract map approval, the project
applicant(s) shall submit a sewer study to both the
County and City Engineer identifying project wastewater
flow and tributary flow to the existing County trunk and
local sewer lines. This study shall identify: (1) the
location, phasing, bonding and details of any proposed
sewer facilities and improvements by street
configuration, lot layout and gravity flow; (2) any
current capacity shortfalls of the County trunk and/or
City sewer lines; and (3) specific design recommendations
to provide additional lines or sizing upgrade, if
required.
13. The project applicant(s) shall convey access and property
easement and rights-of-way to the County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County, as deemed necessary by
the County and City Engineers, for the construction and
maintenance of sewer lines and associated facilities,
prior to final map approval.
14. The project applicant(s) shall contribute an equitable
share of cost, as established by the City, to fund
improvements to the area's main lines, pumping stations,
etc. required as a result of project development, prior
to final map approval.
15. The project applicant(s) shall provide to the County
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County information
regarding the construction and/or building schedule of
the project so that the timing of the County Sanitation
Districts' expansion may be coordinated with the project
increase in demand.
16. In order to minimize the impact of project development on
the County's solid waste disposal system and to
facilitate the attainment of source reduction standards
for the City of Diamond Bar as contained in the
California Integrated Solid Waste management Act of 1989,
the project applicant(s) shall: (1) consult with the
City of Diamond Bar, the County Sanitation Districts of
Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works regarding implementation of technologies
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 7
to reduce and recycle solid waste both during
construction and after completion of the project; and (2)
consult with the current refuse removal collection
company(ies) regarding design standards for access to,
location and construction of trash container enclosures
in order to facilitate implementation of automated refuse
collection.
17. The project applicant(s) or subsequent homeowners'
association(s) shall comply with those source reduction
and recycling and composting requirements as may be
adopted by the City of Diamond Bar in accordance with
Assembly Bill 939.
18. The project applicant(s) through the Buyer Awareness
program, shall encourage the segregation of green wastes
for reuse as specified under the City's Source Reduction
Recycling Element and County Sanitation Districts waste
diversion policies.
19. Applicant shall comply with the mitigation monitoring
program to implement the required EIR No. 92-1 mitigation
measures.
20. The applicant shall provide a thematic design for the
southerly entrance to the site off of the access road
which is consistent with the design of the entry
statement for the entrance to Vesting Tentative Tract
32400 from Brea Canyon Road as a component of the
Development Review application. The entry statement
design shall be consistent with the design elements of
The Country Estates.
21. This project shall be subject to and part of the
Homeowners Association created for Vesting Tentative
Tract 32400 and made a party to the Conditions,
Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project. A
copy of the CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and placed
on file with the Planning Department.
22. Each lot shall be developed in substantial compliance
with the final map and applicable CC&R's.
23. Any lighting fixtures adjacent to interior property lines
shall be approved by the Community Development Director
as to type, orientation and height.
24. All slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the
developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied
by the buyer. Prior to any occupancy permit being
granted, these conditions and all improvements shall be
completed or bonded for subject to the approval of City
Engineer.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 8
25. All down drains and drainage channels shall be
constructed in muted earth tones so as to not impart
adverse visual impacts.
26. All residences will be required to receive approval via
the Development Review process by the Planning Commission
subsequent to approval of the final map.
27. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these
conditions and all improvements shall be completed or
bonded for subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
F. ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:
1. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map,
written certification from each affected district, that
adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be
available and from each public utility and cable
television purveyor that adequate facilities are or will
be available to serve the proposed project, shall be
submitted to the City. Such letters must have been
issued by the district, utility and cable television
company, within ninety (90) days prior to final map
approval.
2. All easements existing prior to final map approval must
be identified and shown on final map. If an easement is
blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that
effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its
location.
3. A title report/ guarantee showing all fee owners, interest
holders, and nature of interest must be submitted when a
final map is submitted for plan check. The account shall
remain open until the final map is filed with the County
Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee and
subdivision guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working
days prior to final map approval.
4. New boundary monuments shall be set in accordance with
the State Subdivision Map Act and as required by the City
Engineer.
5. If any required public improvements have not been
completed by Subdivider and accepted by the City prior to
the approval of the final map Subdivider shall enter into
a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the
appropriate security.
6. All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street, sewer
and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to final map approval.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 9
7. Street names shall be submitted for City review and
approval prior to approval of the final map. Street
names shall not duplicate existing streets within the
City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip code areas.
S. House numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building
permits.
9. The detail drawings and construction notes shown on the
vesting tentative map are conceptual only and the
approval of this map does not constitute approval of said
notes.
10. Subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer the total
grading and drainage construction cost estimate for
bonding purposes prior to approval of the final map.
11. The final grading plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a
grading permit and approval of final map.
12. Precise grading plans for each lot are to be submitted to
the Community Development Department for approval prior
to issuance of building permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis.)
13. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance
with the current Uniform Building Code, City Grading
Ordinance 14 and City's Hillside Management Ordinance, as
modified by CUP91-5 and acceptable grading practices.
The precise and final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved Vesting
Tentative Map.
14. All landslide debris shall be completely removed prior to
fill placement as required by the final geotechnical
report.
15. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for
plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be
submitted in compliance with City guidelines to the City
Engineer for approval and said report shall be prepared
by a registered geotechnical engineer and geologist
licensed by the State of California. The report shall
address, but not be limited to, the following:
(a) Soil remediation measures shall be designed for a
"worst case" geologic interpretation subject to
verification in the field during grading.
(b) The extent of any remedial grading into natural
areas shall be clearly defined on the grading plans.
(c) Areas of potential for debris flow shall be defined
and proper remedial measures implemented as approved
by the City Engineer.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 10
(d) Gross stability of all fill slopes shall be analyzed
as part of the geotechnical report including
remedial fill that replaces natural slope.
(e) Stability of all proposed slopes shall be confirmed
by analysis as approved by the City Engineer.
(f) All geologic data including landslides and
exploratory excavations must be shown on a
consolidated geotechnical map using the 40 -scale
final grading plan as a base.
All geotechnical and soils related findings and
recommendations must be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of any grading permits and
recordation of the final map.
16. Final grading plans shall be prepared in a 24" x 36"
format and designed in compliance with the
recommendations of the final detailed soils and
engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork
specified in the final report shall be incorporated into
the plans.
17. Grading plan(s) must be signed and stamped by a
California registered Civil Engineer, registered
Geotechnical Engineer and registered Geologist.
18. All identified geologic hazards within the vesting
tentative tract boundaries which cannot be eliminated as
approved by the City Engineer shall be indicated on the
final map as "Restricted Use Area" subject to geologic
hazard. The owner shall dedicate to the City the right
to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures
within such restricted use areas shown on the final map.
19. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed
guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities
necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer prior to final map approval and
prior to the issuance of grading permit(s).
20. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over
adjacent parcels shall be delineated and shown on the
final map as approved by the City Engineer.
21. All drainage improvements necessary for dewatering and
protecting the subdivided properties shall be installed
prior to issuance of building permits for construction
upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows
enter, leaving, or within a parcel for which a building
permit is requested.
22. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 11
23. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into
any U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 permit shall be
obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and an
agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game
shall be obtained and submitted to the City Engineer.
24. The Subdivider shall provide drainage facilities to
remove the flood hazard and dedicate and show necessary
easements and/or rights of way on the final map to the
satisfaction of City Engineer. Storm drainage facilities
should be constructed within the street right-of-way or
in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and the
Los Angeles County Flood Control District.
25. All identified flood hazard locations within the
tentative map boundaries which cannot be eliminated as
approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final
map and delineated as "Restricted Use Area" subject to
flood hazard. The Owner shall dedicate to the City the
right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other
structures within such restricted use areas shown on the
final map.
26. A permit from the County Flood Control District is
required for work within its right-of-way or connection
to its facilities. A permit from CALTRANS is required
for work within its right-of-way or connection to its
facilities.
27. A final drainage study and final storm drain improvement
plans in a 2411x36" sheet format shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works prior to final map approval.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with County of Los
Angeles Standards for acceptance and disposal of all
related drainage.
28. Prior to finalization of any development phase,
sufficient street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall
be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure
secondary access, proper outfall for sewers and drainage
protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on
the final map.
29. Subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer the detail
cost estimate for bonding purposes of all public
improvements, prior to approval of the final map.
30. New street centerline movements shall be set at the
intersections of streets, intersection of streets with
tract boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of
curves or the points of intersection of tangents thereof.
Survey notes showing the ties between all movements set
and four (4) durable reference points for each shall be
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 12
submitted to the City Engineer for approval in accordance
with City Standards, prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
31. Street improvement plans in a 241lx36" sheet format,
prepared by a California registered Civil Engineer, shall
be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
Security shall be posted and an agreement executed
guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private
street improvements, prior to final map approval.
32. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,
fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be
obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to
any other permits required.
33. No street shall exceed a maximum slope of 12% unless
approved by the City Engineer.
34. Construct base and pavement on all streets in accordance
with soils report prepared by a California registered
soils engineer and approved by the City Engineer or as
otherwise directed by the City Engineer.
35. Vehicular access must be provided to all "Urban Pollutant
Basins" with a minimum width of 15 feet, with 12 feet of
pavement and with a maximum slope no greater than 15%
unless otherwise approved the City Engineer.
36. Subdivider shall pay its fair share amount for signal
improvements at Pathfinder and Brea Canyon Road prior to
f inal map approval based upon amended traff is study as
approved by the City Engineer.
37. Subdivider shall pay its fair share of other signal
improvements required pursuant to the approved EIR prior
to approval of the final map based upon amended traffic
study as approved by City Engineer.
38. Label any private drives or fire lanes and delineate on
the final map to the satisfaction of the City. Owner
shall offer to dedicate on the final map the public
street from Brea Canyon Road to the westerly vesting
tentative tract boundary. Subdivider shall improve
street to its full width in accordance with City
standards, including, but not limited to, sidewalks on
one side, curbs, gutters, and street lights.
39. Construct or post bonds for drainage improvements and
offer easements needed for street and slope drainage as
required by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the
final map.
40. Construct sidewalks throughout and adjoining the frontage
of the vesting tentative tract per City standards and as
approved by the City Engineer.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 13
41. Provide and install street name signs to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate
of occupancy.
42. All utility lines shall be underground within the Vesting
Tentative Tract Map.
43. Dedicate slope easements along Brea Canyon Road in favor
of the City as required by the City Engineer, prior to
approval or recordation of the final map. The dedicated
slope easements shall be placed in a Homeowner's
Association as directed by the City Engineer.
44. Construct curb and gutters per City standards subject to
approval by the City Engineer.
45. Construct wheelchair ramps at all corners and all
intersections pursuant to City Standards or as may be
required by the City Engineer.
46. Construct street lights along all streets as required to
per City standards and as approved by the City Engineer.
The street lights shall be annexed into the County
lighting districts, or shall be operated and maintained
by a homeowners association.
47. Traffic improvement plans shall be prepared by a
registered Traffic Engineer in a 2411x36" sheet format and
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing
completion of traffic improvements prior to final map
approval.
48. Intersection line of sight designs shall be submitted to
the City for approval as may be required by the City
Engineer.
49. Traffic control signing and striping plans shall be
prepared in accordance with City requirements and
submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of the final map.
50. Secondary street access must be provided as approved by
the City Engineer.
51. Prior to final map approval the subdivider shall submit
a sanitary sewer area study to the City Engineer to
verify that capacity is available in the sewerage system
to be used as the outfall for the sewers in this land
division. If the system is found to be of insufficient
capacity, the problem must be resolved to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
52. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer
lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. The
sanitary sewer system serving the tract shall be
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 14
connected to the City or District sewer system. Said
system shall be of the size, grade and depth approved by
the City Engineer, County Sanitation District and Los
Angeles County Public Works Department, prior to approval
of the final map.
53. The Owner shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City
and County Sanitation District prior to issuance of
building permits. The area within the tentative map
boundaries shall be annexed into the County Consolidated
Sewer Maintenance District and appropriate easements for
all sewer main and trunk lines shall be shown on the
final map and offered for dedication on the final map.
54. The Subdivider, at Subdivider's sole cost and expense,
shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the
City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department and
County Sanitation District Standards.
55. Prior to final map approval a water system with
appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the
land division designed to Walnut Valley Water District
(WVWD) specifications, must be provided and approved by
the City Engineer. The system shall include fire
hydrants of the type and location as determined by the
Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water mains
shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire
flows to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, WVWD and
Fire Department.
56. Prior to final map approval, the Subdivider shall
construct, or enter into an improvement agreement with
the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary
improvements to the existing water system according to
Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to
accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be
required by the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire Department.
57. Provide separate underground utility services to each
parcel, including water, gas, electric power, telephone
and cable TV, in accordance with the respective utility
company standards. Easements required by the utility
companies shall be approved by the City Engineer prior
to granting.
58. Subdivider shall relocate and underground any existing
on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the respective utility owner.
59. Prior to submittal of the final map, written
certifications from Walnut Valley Water District, GTE,
SCE, SCG and Jones Intercable stating that adequate
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed
project shall be submitted to the City.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 15
60. Based on a determination by the City Engineer, the City
reserves the right to require the applicant to plan and
incorporate into the homeowners' association obligations
the future installation of main and service lines
capable of delivery of reclaimed water to all homeowners'
association maintained common area landscaped portions of
the Tract, prior to final map approval. The system shall
be designed to permit "switch over" of non-domestic
services on each area within the homeowners' association
maintained landscaped common area at time of
availability of reclaimed water, all to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer and designed to the specifications
of the Walnut Valley Water District.
61. The applicant has agreed to work with staff to
incorporate the placement of trees along the south side
of the access road to the South Pointe Middle School.
62. The applicant shall incorporate a meandering sidewalk,
minimum 16 foot wide landscape setback, block wall
undulation and landscaping theme as depicted on Exhibit
"C" dated September 18, 1996 along the southerly boundary
of the tract.
63. If the applicant proposes, as part of the final map, to
incorporate private streets, the applicant shall provide
a security/access plan for review and approval by the
City staff. This shall include at least such items as
perimeter walls, gates, gate houses and similar
amenities.
City Council Resolution 96-72 Exhibit B
Page 16
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.:1J,
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996 REPORT DATE: October 16, 1996
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
TITLE: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203
SUMMARY: The applicant, Diamond Crest Estates, requests approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
52203, the subdivision of a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single family residential
development and 6 lettered lots for streets and landscaping
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 96 -XX, a resolution
of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Public Hearing Notification
X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's
_ Ordinances(s) Office)
_ Agreement(s)
Other
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: The project applicant
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
6�y'0 Ai
errence L. Belanger Frank Usher
City Manager 91 Assistant City Manager
X Yes No
MAJORITY
X Yes _ No
X Yes —No
Planning Commission
X Yes _ No
James DeStefano
Community Development Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: November 5, 1996
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203
ISSUE STATEMENT:
The applicant, Diamond Crest Estates requests approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203, the
subdivision of a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single family residential development and
6 lettered lots for streets and landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 96 -XX, a resolution of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTT) 52203 is part of what was originally known as the South Pointe
Master Plan, which was never approved in its original form. The City Council approved VTT 32400,
which includes the project site and the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration and
Mitigation Program for the Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan on
October 18, 1994 (Resolution 94-48). In association with the approval of VTT 32400, Conditional Use
Permit 91-5 and Oak Tree Removal Permit 91-2 were approved by City Council Resolution 94-49.
The 78 acre area adjacent to the South Pointe Middle School encompassed by VTT 51407 was acquired
from RNP Development by the Walnut Valley Unified School in August of 1994. In December of 1994,
VTT 51407 was denied by the City Council. On May 14, 1995, TT 51253, proposed by the Sasak
Corporation was approved for 21 residential units on 7 acres.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is comprised of 6.3 acres located at the southerly end of VTT 32400, on the west side
of Brea Canyon Road, north of Pathfinder Road. The project site is located within the Low Density
Residential (RL) General Plan land use designation and is zoned Single Family Residential, (R-1-15,000).
As approved, VTT 32400 consists of 93 lots on 47.44 acres. Ninety-one lots.are approved for single
family homes, with two residual, residentially zoned parcels (Lots 92 and 93) totaling 6 acres set aside
for future development.
Under the current proposal, VTT 52203, the applicant is requesting to further subdivide Lots 92 and 93
of VTT 32400 into 16 numbered lots for single family development and 6 lettered lots for streets and
landscaping. Lots 1-16 represent the residential lots, Lots A -C are proposed for private streets and Lots
D -F for open space. Once developed, VTT 32400 and 52203 will comprise a single, private, gate -guarded
community.
The average lot size (including the numbered and lettered lots) is 17,152 square feet. The actual lot sizes
range from 7,606 square feet (Lot 8) to 16,785 square feet (Lot 15). The pad areas range in size from
7,000 square feet (Lot 7) to 16,785 square feet (Lot 15).
Clearing and grading of the project site, including the area encompassed by the current proposal was
approved under VTT 32400. Therefore, the proposed project will occur on a site that is essentially a
cleared and graded parcel of land. Very little additional grading will be required, involving only two (2)
cubic yards of cut and 15,088 cubic yards of fill.
The interior streets will be private and generally have a right-of-way (ROW) of 60', although portions
of streets "A" and "B" will have a ROW of 54'. While privately maintained, all streets will include
curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Street "C," which will be reconfigured from what was approved as part
of VTT 32400 will accommodate a vehicle turn -around with an information kiosk, landscaped median
and restricted access gateway.
External access to the site will be from two points off of Brea Canyon Road, located at the northwestern
end of the VTT 32400 and at the southerly end of VTT 52203. The alignment of the southerly road was
approved by the City Council as part of VTT 32400 to connect Brea Canyon Road and the South Pointe
Middle School. The boundary of this road generally parallels the southerly boundary of VTT 52203.
DISCUSSION:
VTT 52203 was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 9, 1996. Concerns were expressed
by the Commission regarding the design of the the "double frontage" or "through lots" along the
southerly tract boundary, which have both their front and rear boundarys directly adjacent to streets. The
Commission continued the project to September 23, 1996 to allow the applicant to consider redesigning
the tract to incorporate a greenbelt with a meandering walkway and enhanced landscaping to buffer the
rear of the homes from the street and provide an improved streetscape.
At the September 23, 1996 Planning Commission meeting the applicant presented a revision to the project
(see attached Exhibit "C") which included an increased landscaped setback with a meandering walkway
and a block wall alung the southerly tract boundary- faJjac ccie co d.-—Fe---A----r., A MlAiffill 1
16' of landscaping will be provided within the ROW adjacent to the tract. The landscaping will be
consistent with the vegetation that is native to the canyon area and will be arranged in natural plant
groupings. This will enhance the appearance of the streetscape along the access road and provide
additional buffering for the homes located adjacent to this road.
Subject to these revisions, on September 23, 1996 the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203.
A condition of approval was included in the resolution approving VTT 32400 requiring that the applicant
purchase the 4 acres of City owned property on the project site. Development of VTT 32400 and
therefore VTT 52203 cannot occur unless this condition is fulfilled. The applicant has made an offer to
the City to purchase this land. On September 17, 1996, after completion of the formal 60 day period
where the property is offered to other public agencies, the City Council directed the City to accept
Arciero's contingent offer for the purchase of the 4 acre portion of the site and to direct staff to start the
proceedings to enter into escrow for the sale of this property.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
On June 3, 1994, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Southe
Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse x/92081040) which includes the subject property. Pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that potential environmental
impacts associated with the proposed project will not require major revisions to the EIR in that no
significant changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken have occurred and no new
information or issues of substantial importance not previously addressed in the Final EIR have been
identified through the subsequent environmental review and therefore an addendum to the Final EIR has
been prepared for this project.
CONCLUSION:
The Planning Commission has reviewed this project and found that it is consistent with the General Plan,
the provisions of the Planning and Zoning Code and the design and conditions for VTT 32400. Further,
it has been found that the proposed project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Subdivision
Map Act and the provisions of the City's Subdivision Code.
PREPARED BY:
Catherine Johnson
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Draft Resolution of Approval, Draft Conditions of Approval
VTT 32400 -Map, VTT 52203 -Map
PC Minutes, 10/9/96, 10/23/96 (excerpts)
PC Resolution
EIR Addendum
Public Hearing Notice
Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 52203 A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.3
GROSS ACRE SITE INTO SIXTEEN NUMBERED LOTS
FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
6 LETTERED LOTS FOR STREETS AND LANDSCAPING
AND THE ADDENDUM TO THE EIR FOR SOUTH POINTE
MASTER PLAN (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #92081040),
LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD,
NORTH OF PATHFINDER ROAD IN DIAMOND BAR
CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS.
1. The property owner, Arciero and Sons, the applicant
Diamond Crest Estates, LLC, and the applicant's agent,
Hunsaker and Associates, together, the "Applicant" have
filed an application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map
52203.
2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was
established as a duly organized municipal corporation of
the State of California. Thereafter, the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 14
(1990), thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as
the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and
22 of the Los Angeles County Code contain the
Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now
currently applicable to development applications,
including the subject Application, within the City of
Diamond Bar.
3. On July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted a
General Plan. Action was taken on the subject
application as to the consistency with the General Plan.
It has been determined that the proposed project is
consistent with the General Plan.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on
September 9, 1996 and September 23, 1996 conducted duly
noticed public hearings on the Application.
5. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar on November
5, 1996 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
Application.
6. Notification of the public hearing for this project has
been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on October 10, 1996 and
October 11, 1996 respectively and on October 22, 1996.
Ninety-one property owners within a 500 foot radius of
the project site were notified by mail on October 11,
1
1996 and October
notification w
approximately 3
surrounding the
Plan.
B. Resolution.
18, 1996. Further, additional public
as provided through mailings to
00 property owners within the area
originally proposed South Pointe Master
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all
of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The City Council hereby determines that potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project will not require major revisions to the
Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
South Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse
#92081040) which includes the subject property,,in
that no substantial changes are proposed in the
project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of the previously
identified significant effects; no substantial
changes in circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of
the previous EIR have occurred due to indirect or
new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects; and no new
information or issues of substantial importance
which were not known and could not have been known
with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the
time the previous EIR was certified as complete
shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant
effects not discussed in the previous EIR;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will
be significantly more severe than shown in the
previous EIR.
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously
found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative;
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in
the previous EIR would substantially reduce
one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation or
2
alternative.
Therefore an addendum to the EIR has been prepared and
is hereby being approved.
4. Based on the findings and the conclusions set forth
herein, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a vacant parcel,
approximately 6.3 acres in size located on the
west side of Brea Canyon Road, north of
Pathfinder Road. The project site is zoned
Single Family Residential, R-1-15,000. It has
a General Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (RL). The proposed map
and the design and improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the allowable
density of development permitted within the RL
General Plan land use designation, General
Plans goals and strategies. This site is not
part of a specific plan.
(b) Generally, the following zones and uses
surround the project site: to the north is
the Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size
8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone; to the
south is vacant land zoned Residential Planned
Development (RPD -10,000), Brea Canyon Road and
the 57 Freeway to the east, and the South
Pointe Middle School to the west, which has a
zoning designation of (R-1-15,000).
(c) The proposed project is a request to subdivide
a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots
for residential development and 6 lettered
lots for streets and landscaping.
(d) The proposed project will not:
(1) Adversely affect the health, peace,
comfort or welfare of persons residing in
the surrounding area; or
(2) Be materially detrimental to the use,
enjoyment or valuation of property of
other persons located in the vicinity of
the site; or
(3) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise
constitute a menace to public health,
safety or general welfare; and
(e) The proposed site is physically suitable for
the type and proposed density of development
in that it is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development features.
(f) The project site is adequately served:
3
(1) By highways or streets of sufficient
width and improved as necessary to carry
the kind and quantity of traffic such use
would generate; the site is adequately
served by Brea Canyon Road and private
roadways will be constructed within the
subject tract which have been reviewed
and determined to be adequate to
accommodate traffic generated by this
project and;
(2) By other public or private service
facilities as are required. This project
has been conditioned to provide or be
connected to all necessary public
services and facilities.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed project
will not be materially detrimental to the use,
enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development, and will not create traffic or
pedestrians hazards. Vesting Tentative Tract
Map 52203 has been designed with lots and a
system of private streets which are adequate
to accommodate the proposed level of
residential development.
(h) The design of this project will provide a
desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors
through good aesthetic use of materials,
texture and color that will remain
aesthetically appealing and will retain a
reasonably adequate level of maintenance. The
project has been designed and conditioned to
ensure that it will provide a desirable
environment for its residents and the homes
will be constructed providing good aesthetic
use of materials and design.
(i) The design of the subdivision and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife in their habitat, in that an EIR (SCH
#92081040) has been certified for the project
site by the City Council on June 3, 1994 and
Findings of Facts and Statement of Overriding
Considerations and Mitigation Reporting and
Program has been adopted by the City Council
on October 18, 1994, which has adequately
addressed any potential impacts on wildlife at
this site.
(j) The design of the subdivision and the type of
improvements will not conflict with easements,
acquired by the public at large for access
4
through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision. The proposed map has been
reviewed by the Planning Division and
Engineering Department and it has been
determined that the proposed subdivision and
any improvements will not conflict with any
on-site easements for public access.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth
above, the City Council hereby approves the
Application subject to the following conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to
plans collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" and
Exhibit "C" dated November 5, 1996 as
submitted and approved by the City Council.
b) The project shall conform to the Conditions of
Approval collectively labeled as Exhibit "B"
dated November 5, 1996 as submitted and
approved by the City Council.
(c) This grant is valid for two years from the
date of the City Council resolution and shall
be exercised (i.e. construction started)
within that period or this grant shall expire.
A one year extension may be requested in
writing and submitted to the City 30 days
prior to the expiration date.
(d) This grant shall not be effective for any
purpose until the permittee and owner of the
property involved (if other than the
permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15)
days of approval of this grant, at the City of
Diamond Bar Community Development Department,
their affidavit stating that they are aware of
and accept all the conditions of this grant.
Further, this grant shall not be effective
until the permittee pays all remaining City
processing fees.
The City Council shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution;
and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail, to Arciero and
Sons, 16590 Aston St., Irvine CA 92714.
1996
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 5th day of November,
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 5th
day of November, 1996 by following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
R
City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar
EXHIBIT H
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 11/5/96
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 shall
not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized
representative of the applicant has filed with the
Community Development Department an Affidavit of
Acceptance, thereby accepting all conditions of this
approval which Affidavit shall be filed within 15 days of
the date of approval.
2. All requirements of the Resolution, the applicable Zoning
District, the City Codes, City departmental policies,
rules and regulations of any State, Federal or local
agency with jurisdiction thereof shall be complied with
by the Applicant.
3. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) and
(c), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees
from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside,
void or annul, an approval of the City, which action is
brought within the time period provided for in Government
Code Section 66499.37.
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Provide and locate water mains, fire hydrants and fire
flows as required by Fire Department and Fire Code.
2. Fire Department access shall be extended to within 150
feet distance of any portion of structure to be built and
shown on the final map.
3. Access shall comply with Section 10.207 of the Fire Code
(all weather access).
4. Driveways shall include, as necessary, turnarounds
suitable for fire protection equipment use and shown on
the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed,
constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for
Fire Department use.
5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and
accepted prior to construction of on-site improvements.
Vehicular access must be provided and maintained
serviceable throughout construction.
6. All hydrants shall be brass or bronze and conform to
current AWWA standard AC503 or approved equal. All
hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25' from a
structure.
1
C_ C�MMi1N=TY DEV i+i �Fu z+vs a��-.��. ��=mv� r �nnusyz-a
1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall be recorded in
concert with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400. In the
event that Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400 is not
recorded, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall not be
recorded as a separate, independent tract.
2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance
with the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and plans
approved by the City Council.
3. Exterior construction activities (grading, framing, etc.)
shall be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, except that interior building
construction activities shall not be limited. All
construction equipment shall be properly muffled to
reduce noise levels. Transportation of equipment and
materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall
also be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00, Monday
through Saturday. All equipment staging areas shall be
sited on the subject property. Dust generated by
construction activities shall be reduced by watering the
soil prior to and during grading activities. Use of
reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible.
4. Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not
limited to, planning, building and school fees) at the
established rates prior to recordation of the final map
and issuance of building permits.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the
applicant/ subdivider shall prepare and submit to the
Director of Community Development for approval a "Buyers
Awareness Package" addressing VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 as
a single development, which shall include, but not be
limited to, information pertaining to geologic and
environmental issues regarding the property, freeway
noise, proximity to bus routes and oak tree preservation
issues, explanatory information pertaining to
restrictions on use of properties as necessary and
similar related matters. Applicant shall institute a
program to include delivery of a copy of said "Buyer
Awareness Package" to each prospective purchaser and
shall keep on file in the office of Applicant with copies
to the City and a receipt signed by each such prospective
purchaser indicating that the prospective purchaser has
received and read the information contained within the
"Buyer Awareness Package."
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the variety of
materials and colors to be used on the exteriors of
residential structures shall be approved in form and
color by the Community Development Director as a part of
the Development Review of the model homes.
7. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these
conditions and all improvements shall be completed or
bonded for, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. The use authorized by this approval shall be commenced or
construction necessary and incidental thereto shall be
started on or before the time limit specified herein and
thereafter diligently advanced on or before the (2)
second year after the expiration of City Council
approval.
9. Applicant shall pay all remaining City project review and
processing fees prior to recordation of the tract map as
required by the Community Development Director.
D. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
1. As a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts,
the applicant shall suspend construction in the vicinity
of a cultural resource encountered during development of
the site, and leave the resource in place until a
qualified archaeologist can examine them and determine
appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant shall
comply with mitigation measures recommended by the
archaeologist and approved by the Community Development
Director.
Upon initiation of grading activities, a paleontological
grading observation schedule by a Certified
Paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in
bedrock units to further evaluate the fossil resources of
the site. Salvage operations shall be initiated and
coordinated with the project applicants if significant
concentrations of fossils are encountered.
2. Plant street trees as directed pursuant to the adopted
street tree plan in effect at the time of recordation and
approved by the City Engineer.
3. No underground utilities shall be constructed within the
drip line of any mature tree preserved on-site except as
approved by a registered arborist.
4. The mitigation monitoring program contained in EIR No.
92-1 (SCH 91081040) and approved by the City shall be
implemented and rigorously complied with. Applicant
shall deposit and maintain with the City, a fund in such
amounts required by the Director of Community Development
to defray the cost of implementation and monitoring by
City staff and consultants retained by City.
5. A single, detailed landscape and irrigation plan for VTT
32400 and VTT 52203 including slope planting and model
home landscaping, shall be prepared by a licensed
landscape architect and submitted for City review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. Fence
details, tree staking, soil preparation, planting details
and an automatic irrigation system and the incorporation
of xerotropic landscaping shall be incorporated wherever
feasible. The Applicant shall pay all processing fees
associated with plan review.
constructed in muted earth tones so as to not impart
adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow land
form slope configuration and shall not be placed in
exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in
swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face.
7. Prior to approval of a project landscape plan the
applicant shall demonstrate that the landscaping palette
for the project emphasizes the use of drought tolerant,
native plant species with low water requirements adapted
to the inland Southern California climate. Also, plants
used in perimeter or common area landscaping shall
include those which provide nectar, fruit or seeds as
food for native wildlife species. With the proper
selection and placement of native plants, the proposed
development would retain some of its natural value.
Recommended plants for landscaping include:
Big -Leaf Maple
Bigberry Manzanita
Coyote Brush
Ceanothus
Redbud
Toyon
Honeysuckle
California Sycamore
Holly -leaved Cherry
California Coffeeberry
Holly -leaved Redberry
Sugarbush
Chaparral Currant
Our Lord's Candle
California -Fuchsia
Acer macrophylla
Arctostaphylos glauca
Baccharis pilularis
Ceanothus spp.
Cercis occidentalis
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Lonicera spp.
Platanus racemose
Prunus ilicifolia
Rhamnus californica
Rhamnus ilicifolia
Rhus ovata
Ribes malvaceum
Yucca whipplei
Zauschneria californica
8. Prior to issuance of building permits, if applicable, Los
Angeles County Fire Department requirements for
development in a wildland fire area shall be incorporated
to reduce potential fire hazards. These provisions
include, but may not be limited to: (1) fire -resistive
protection of exterior walls/openings; (2) fire -retardant
roof covering; (3) fire -resistive construction for decks,
balconies and support structures; and (4) chimney screens
installed on each chimney flue.
9. Project design and maintenance activities shall comply
with brush clearance programs administered by the Los
Angeles County Fire Department.
10. Prior to the initiation of construction activities,
building permits or recordation, the project applicant(s)
shall submit and the County Forester and Fire Warden
shall approve a fire hazard reduction/fuel management
plan to minimize brush fire hazards on-site. That plan
shall include, but may not be limited to: (1) use of
fire retardant construction materials; (2) brush
clearance and maintenance activities within 100 feet
4
5LAXE-UUnding individual structures; (3) irrigated planting
■
P'
■
aq Apu sP sgTuaad SHadM pup aagPMuaogs 'uoTgOnagsuoo
eTgPOTTdde TTP uTpggo TTPgS (s)guPOTTddP goaCoad
agq 'suoTgpaado buTppab 3o uOTgPTgTUT aqg og aOTad •S
•gOTagsTG aaupuagUTPM apg
puOMPTG go AgTD ao Aqunoo saTabuV sOq agq oguT pagdaoop
aq TTegs uagsAs ableuTeap uTRM aqs •gOTagsTo buTggbTZ
pup adpospupq aqg go gapd aq TTTM uTPap uMOp PUP aOPaaay
•saT4TTT3QJ abPUTPap uaogs agTs-uo 3o aOUPUaquTpu
agq jog pagSTTgPqsa aq TTPgs AgTD aqq Aq panoaddP pup
oq aTgpgd000p 'AgTqua aTbuTS P SP £OZZS gOPas aATgPguas
buTgsaA puP 00tZ£ gOPas aAgpquas buTgsaA buTssaappp
usTUPgOaui buTpung aaggo -Jo gOTagSTp aOUPuaquTpUl
TPToads P 'dPu gop-Tq TPuT3 aqq 3O TPAOaddP aqq oq aoTad •�
•aeg puOUPTQ 3O AgTD aqq PUP sxaoM OTTgnd
3o quaugapdao Aqunoo saTabuV soq aqq ggoq go squamaaTnbaa
uotgOnagsuoo pup spaepuPgs ubTsap'PTaagTaO mo -[j aqq
ggTM aOulepa000p UT aq TTpgs saTgTTTOP3 abPUTPap goaCoud
3o UOTgPTTPgsuT PUP ubTsap ags •aaauTbus AgTO aqq
oq AaogOPJsTgPS aauuPu P UT go pasodsTp aq TTPgs abPUTPJQ •£
•aaauTbua Aqunoo aqg Aq pasoduT ATTaPuogsno
squaussassP aaggO ao sgTuaad Aup (V) JO/PUP SMOT3
pagngTaquoo 3o saa3 uoTgpbTgTm pagpaoad (£) !S4UOManoaduT
u94SAS uTPap Maogs a4Ts-3Jo PUP gDPaq-UT 3O uOTgonjgsuoo
agq (Z) :Agunoz) saTabuV soZ 3o aaauTbus Aqunoo pup
aaauTbus AgTo aqq Aq panOjdde s9TgTTTOP3 abeuTeaQ Jo uPTd
aagseK aqq UT pauTPquOO SP sguauanoaduT abRUTPap agTs-UO
paaTnbaa Aup 3o UOTgOnagSUOO aqq aOJ spun] 3O quaUlaOUPApp
AO UOTgOnagsuoO aqg (T) :suagT buTMOTTO3 aqq jog
aTgTsuodsaa ATTPTOUPUTJ aq TTPgs guPOTTddp goaCoad aqs •z
-Aqunoo pup AgTO aqq Aq paaTnbaa ao/pup agTs aqq
jog peapdaad aq Aeu sp sgaodaa TPOTugoagoaq aaggo guns
PUP '£OZZS gOPal aATgPquas buTgsaA 3O PaaP aqq buTpnZouT
P -1 -4 -ad Aq gaodea guanbasgns agg Pup 886T '8T aagogOO
'•OUI 'TPOTUgOa4oa9 pagad) saTabuV sOq 3o Aqunoo 'OOVZ£
-OR goPas aATgPquas ao3 UOTgebTgsanul buTaaauTbUH sTTOS
AaPUTuTTaad aqq UT pauTPquOO suoTgppuauuoOaa ggTM uaOguOO
TTPgs pule spaepuPgs Agunoo pup AgTz) ajgPoTTdde ggTM
aouepaODOP UT pagOnpuoO PUP paubTsap aq TTPgS SaTgTAT40P
guaudoTanap pagPTOossle PUP xaoMggapa 'buTppab TTY •T
•agTs goaCoad aqq oq
ATddp gOTgm O ao 'q 'P SUOTgoasgns uT pagsTT SUOTgTpuOO gOPaq aqq
Aq paaaAOD qou saanspau UOTgPbTgTm IdIa aae suotgTpuoO buTMOTTO3 aqs
(p ao a 'q 'B suotgaasgns UT pesseapple qou)
33UQSY3W NOISYDISIN HIS 3ZSYDIZddY 'a
•upTd aATgPgabanaa
agq oguT pagPaodaoouT aq TTlegs squPTd aunToA Tana -MOT
'saaTJ PUPIPTTM 90 gPaagq TPTquagod aqq gTUTT oq aapao uI -TT
•SXPaaq aaTJ 90 aOUpuaquTeU PUP uOTsTAoad aqq
(V) PUP :saTgTATgoP aoUPuaquTPU ao3 SUOTSTAOad ggTM sea -TP
buTquPTd pagPbraaT (£) !saangOnags TpnpTATpuT buTpunoaans
required by the City, the County of Los Angeles and the
I
j
IIr.
pasodoad Aup 3o STTpgap pus buTPuoq 'buTspgd 'uoTgsooT
aqg (T) :A3T4u9PT TTpgs Apngs STgs •sauTT aaMas TpOOT
pup xunaq Aqunoo buTgsTxa aqg Og MOTg AapgngTag pup MOTS
aagpMagspM 4oaCoad buTA3TquapT aaauTbug AgTD pup Aqunoo
aqg ggoq og xpngs aaMas p gTmgns TTpgs (s)gupOTTddp
4oaCoad aqq 'Tpnoadde dew gopaq TeUT3 og aoTad 'ZT
•uoTgenaasgo Tonged
aaggaq jog gaaags aqq moa3 AgTTTgTsTA aansua oq sassaappe
gaaags PageuTunTTT (t,) pup !SUOTgpAaasgo unuTgdo
aPTAoad oq sToagpd aOTTod aog sseDOp paubTsap-TTaM (E)
!bUTggbTT AgTanOas aoTaagxa (Z) !SaTgTATgop „quamaATOAUT
poogaogqbTau„ s94pgTTT0e3 gOTgM UOTgpquaTaO gTun buTTTaMP
TpTguapTSaa (T) :apnTouT Apu ubTsep TpuT3 aqg oguT
pagpaodaoouT aq TTegs gOTgM saangeag AgTanoas -4oaCoad 'TT
•aaauTbua AgTo aqq Aq agpTadoaddp
pauaap saanspau asogg 3o UOTgpquamaTdmT pup SOTgaadoad
asogq jog Apnqs asTou guanbasgns p 3o aouegdaoop s,AgTD
aqq uodn paspq aq TTpgs aoupTTduoo 'spappuegs asTou AgTD
ggTM aoupTTduioo uT sTanaT og asTou OT33paq buTgpnuaggp
AT9ATg09339 saTgaadoad asogq jog aaTaapq asTou aTgpgTns p
gOnagsuOO TTpgs (s)gUPOTTdde goaCoad aqq 'COZZg 'OH goeas
aATgpguas UTggTM ATaATsnTOuT 19T gbnoagg t,T 'soH gori
TpTquapTsaa aog sgTuaad buTPTTnq 30 aOuenssT aqg og aoTad 'OT
•sdTag
xonag quamdTnba-AAeaq aOnpaa ao/pup ageuTmTTa oq agTs
-uo paaogs aq TTpgs quamdTnbe uoTgonagsuoo 'aTgTsea3 uagm '6
'aoupuTpap asTON s,apg
PUOMPTp 3o AgTD aqg 3o SUOTSTAOzd aTgPOTTddp ggTM ATdmoo
pup og maoguoo TTpgs 'quamdTnbe go aoupuaguTem pup aTpdaa
aqq buTpnTOUT 'saTgTAT40P aOupuagUTpu pup uOTgOnagsuOD -g
•UOTgPZTTpubTS gonS 3O 4800 Tpgoq aqg
go aapgs egpaoad aqq Apd TTegs qupoTTddV •ppoa UOAUPD
eaag ggo saOupagua ppoa aogOaTTOO ggoq gp aadOTanap
Aq paTTegsuT aq TTpgs TeubTS a 'pagueaaeM 3I •paaTnbaa
ST TpubTs OT33pa4 p 3T auTuaagap oq pagonpuoo aq
TTegs gueaaeM TpubTs oT33eaq e '-4oaCoad aqq 3o sguauoduoo
TeTquapTsaa aog ueTd agTs agg 3o quaudOTanap aq-4 ggTM 'L
•guemasanquTea pagpa-oad oq goaCgns eq pup 'squamanoaduT
PUP SUOTgpoTpap asogq aPTAoad TTpgs qupOTTddV •ggbTs
-go-auTT Aaessaoau agq gonagsgo you op 'SUOTgOasaaguT
gaaCoad TeuaaguT TTe se TTaM se 'suoTgOasaaguT
asagq oq quaoUCPp buTdeospueT pup sappab aangn3 aq-4 gpgg
uaxeg aq TTegs aapZ) •aouegsTP ggbTS agenbapp apTAoad
oq paubTsap aq TTpgs peog uoAupZ) pang buoTp squTod
ssaOOp -4oaCoad omq aq-4 go goea gp paPTAoad aq TTegs
saueT uanq-4;9T 'snTd 'pane pappab aqg 90 guagxa aqg og
'gopaq aqq oq quaopCpp 'xooaquaTO 3O ggnos uOTgOas-ssoaO
9upT-ano3 pauueTd aq-4 oq 'ao3 papuoq -To Pa40nagsUO0
aq TTpgs peog uOAueD pang 'Tenoadde dem TeuT3 oq aoTad '9
•sgupgnTTod upgan 3o abapgosTp
aqq ao3 papog ToaquoD AgTTpnb aagpM TpuoTbag eTuao3TjpD
aqq pup saTabuV SOq go Aqunoo aqq 'AgTo aqg Aq paaTnbea
G
saanspam
uOTgpbTgTm T -Z6 'OH gIg paJTnbaJ agg guamajdMT og mpaboad
buTJOgTUOUI UOTgPbTgTLU agg ggTm ATdmoo TTPgs guPOTTddv -6T
•saToTTod DOTSJaATp
agSPM sgOTagSTQ UOTgpgTUPS RgunoD pup guamala buTTOADag
uoTgonpag ao.znoS s;AgTo aqq aapun paTjToads sp asnaa Jog
sagspM uaaab go uoTgpbaabas aqq abpano0u9 TTPgs Impaboad
ssauaapmV -laAng agg gbnoagg (S)-4UP0TTddp goaCoad ags '8T
*6C6 TTTg ATquzassV
ggTM 90UPpaoOOP UT JPg pUOMPTQ 30 A -4T3 aqg Aq pagdopp
aq Aleuz sp squauzaaTnbaz buTgsodmoo pup buTTo�Coa-T pup
uoTgonpaa aoanos asogg ggTM ATduzoo TTpgs (s)uoTgeTOOssP
,Saaumoauzoq guanbasgns ao (s)4UPOTTddle goaCo.zd aqj 'GT
•UOT409TTOO
asn3aa pagpmognp 3o UOT4P4u9m9Tdm-r ag2gTTT0PJ Og aapao UT
saansOTOua laUTP4UO0 gspag 3O UOTgon.zgsuoo-pup uoTgleOoT
'og ssaOOP lOj spaPpuPgS ubTSap buTp-lPbaa (saT) AuPduzoo
uOT40ajjoO TPAouxaa asnjaa guaaanO aqg ggTM gTnsuoo
(Z) pup !goaCoad aqq 3o UOTgaTdmoo aagjP pup uoTgonagsuoo
buTanp ggoq agspm pTTOS aTOA09a pup aonpaa og
S9Tbojoug09g 3O UOT4P4u9m9TdmT buTpapbaa sxaOM oTTgnd 3o
guauzgapdaa Agunoo saTabuV sol agg pup Agunoo saTabuv Soq
3O S40Ta4STa UOTgpgTuPS Agunoo aqg 'aPq PUOMPTG 3O A4TO
agg ggTM -4TnSUOD (T) :TTpgS (S)gupoTTddp goaCoad ail -4
'686T 90 40V guauzabPuPm agsPM PTTOS pagpabagul pTuao3TTp0
agg UT pauTPguOO SP JPq puouzPTQ 90 A4T3 aqg JO3
spappupgs UOTgonpa.z aoanos 3o guaMUTPggP aqq 94P4TTT0p3
og pup magsAs TPsodsTp agsPm pTTOs s,RgunOD aqg
uo guamdOTanap goaCoad go govdmT aqg azTuzTUTM og aapao UI *9T
'puPMap UT aspaaOuT
goaCoad aqq ggTM p94PUTPJOOO ag QPM uOTsupdxa ,SgOTJ4STG
UOT4PgTUPS Aqunoo aqq 3o bUTIUTg aqq gpgq os goaCoad agg
JO aTnpagOs buTpTTnq ao/pue uoTgon.zgsuoo aqq buTpapbaa
UOTgPUIJOJUT A4un0D saTabuV SOq 30 S40TJ4STQ UOT4P4TuPS
AgunOD agg og apTAoad TTpgs (S)guPOTTddu goaCoad ags 'ST
• T PAoaddp dpuz T PUT 3 og
aoT-ld 'guamdOTanap goaCoad 3o gTnsaa P sp paaTnbaa •oga
' SUOTgPgs buTduznd ' SaUTI uTPuz s, Pa-lP aqq og sguameAoaduzT
puna oq 'A-4Tz) aqq Aq pagsTTgpgsa sp 'gsoo go azpgs
ajgPgTnba up agngTaguOO TTPgs (s)gupOTTddp goaCoad ags, *VT
•TPAOaddp dPM TPuT3 Og JOTJd
'S8TgTTT01p3 pagPTOOssP pule S8UTT -lamas -4O 80UPUaguTeM
PUP uOTgOnagsuOO agg aOj 'saaauTbug A-4TO pule A4UnO0 aqg
Aq Aapssa0au pauzaap se 'A4UnOD saTabUV sOq 3O S40T_14STG
uOTgPgTUPS Agunoo aqg og Alem-go-SggbTa PUP guaUMSs a
A4g adoad pup SS900P A6AUO3 TTPgs (s)guPOTTddP goaCoad aqy 'CT
'paJTnba-1
3T 'appabdn buTzTs ao sauTT TPUOTgTppP apTAoad og
suoTgPpu9unuo09-1 ubTsap OTJToads (£) pup !saUTT lamas A4TO
ao/pup xunag A4UnOD aqg 3O sTTP34aogs A4TOpdpo guaaan0
Aup (Z) !MOTS A4TAP-lb pule -noAPT g0T 'uoTgpanbT;uoo
498ags Aq SguaManO-ldUT pup SaTgTTTOp3 Jamas
•Tenoadde
dem TeuTj Og aOTad sAgp (06) AgauTU UTggTM 'Auedmoo
UOTsTAaTag aTgPo pug AgTTTgn 'goTagsTp agq Aq panssT
uaaq aneg gsnm saaggaT gong •AgTD agq og paggTmgns
aq TTpgs 'goaCoad pasodoad agq aAzas og aTgPTTene aq
TTTM aO aaP saTgTTTOP; egenbape gggq aoAanand UOTSTAeTaq
aTgpo pup AgTTTgn OTTgnd goPa moaj pup aTgpTTpAP
aq TTTM JO aae saTgTTToe; aageM pup jamas agpnbape
gegq 'goTjgsTp pagoa-Tjp gopa moaj uoTgeoTjTgaao uaggTaM
'dem TvuT; agq 30 uoTggpaooaa pug Tgnoadde og aoTad 'T
:slxaNaHIn6av 9NIassXima '3
'aaauTbUa AgTD aqq 3o TPAOudde aqq oq goaCqns Ao3 papuoq
-To pagaTdmoo aq TTpgs sguamanoadmT TTP pup SUOTgTpuoO
asagq 'paqueab buTaq gTmaad Aouedn000 Aue og aoTad 'GZ
•dPu TPUTJ aqq 90 TPAoaddP oq guanbasgns
uoTssTmmoo buTuueTd aqq Aq ssaooad MaTAaa quamdOTanaQ 9T4-4PTA Tgnoadde aATaoaa og paaTnbaa aq TTTM saouapTsaa TTS '9Z
•sgoedmT TPnsTA asaanpP
gaedmT you og sP os sauog ggapa pagnm uT pagonagsuoo
aq TTPgs sTauuggo abPUTpap PUP SUTPap UMop TTV 'SZ
•aaauTbug
AgTO 90 TPAOaddP aqq oq goaCqns aoj papuoq ao pagaTdmoo
aq TTPgs SgUeManoadmT lie pup suoTgTpuoo asagq 'paqueab
buTaq gTmaad Aoupdn000 Aup og aoTad •aaAnq aqq Aq
paTdn000 PUP PTOs ST gTun TPnpTATpUT gOPa TTqun aadoTanap
agq Aq UOTgTpuoo buTATagg PUP AggTeag e uT pauTequTpm
ATsnonuTguoo aq TTPgs UOTgPbTzaT PUP buTquPTd adOTs TTV 'bZ
•ggbTag pup UOTgeguaTao 'adAg oq sp
aogoaaTQ quamdoleAeG AgTunmmoD aqq Aq panoaddP aq TTegs
sauTT Agaadoad JOTa94UT og guaopCpp saan4xT3 buTggbTT AUV •£Z
•s,a��� OTgpoTTddp pup dem TPUTJ agq ggTM
aouPTTduoO TgTquggsgns uT padoTanap aq TTugs goT gOPg 'ZZ
•quamgapdaQ buTuueTd agq ggTM OTT; uo
paoeTd pup dem STgg ggTM Papaooaa aq TTegs 'AauaoggV AgT3
agq 30 TPAoaddp agq oq goaCqns 'UOTgPTOOSSV saaumOamOH
aqq go uoTgPaodaooui 3o saToTgaV pug s,a100 aqq go Adoo
V •goaCoad STgg aOJ (s,11100) SUOTgoTagsag PUP 'squPuaAOD
'SUOTgTpuOZ) agq og Aq-Ted a apem pue OO�Z£ goeas
aATgpquay buTgsan JO; pagPaao uOTgPTOOSSV SJGUM09MOH
aqq go gapd pup oq goaCqns aq TTPgs goaCoad sTgs 'TZ
•Saqugsa AagunoD agy
JO squamaTa ubTsap aqq ggTM guagsTsuoo aq TTPgs ubTsap
guamagegs Aagua agy 'UOTgPOTTdde MOTAaa quamdoTanaQ
aqq go guauodmoo P sp ppoa uoAuPD Paag moa; 00VZ£
gOPas aATgequas buTgsaA og aouPaqua aqq ao3 quamagPgs
Aaqua aqq 3o ubTsap agq ggTM guagsTsuoo ST gOTgM
ppoa ssaooP aqq J0 jjO agTs aqq oq aoueaqua ATaaggnos
egg aog ubTsap oTgpmagg e apTAoad TTpgs queoTTddP agy 'OZ
LO
•saoTgoPjd bUTPPJb aTgsgdaooE pup 5-T6df1Z) Aq PaT3TPout
se 'aoueuTPIO guauzabeueK aPTSTTTH s,AgTO pup VT aoupuzp.zp
bUTPPjD AgTz) 'apoz) buzpTznu m-io3Tun qua.z.zno aq-4 ggTM
aouppaOOop UT aq TTpgs Agjado.ad goaCgns agg 3o bUTPPID • CT
(• szspq agzsoduzoo 10 Te4u9uz9JOUT
up uo aq Auu szgy) •SgTtujad buzpTznq 3o eouenssT oq
.
aOTad Tenojddp o3 queuigaPdau quaudoTanaQ Agzunuzu100 agg
oq paggTmqns aq oq aip qoT gopa jo3 supTd bUTPPAb asTDOJd ' ZT
• deli TpuT3 30 Teno.zddp pup qTu jad buzpeab
p 3o aoupnsst oq ao-raa jaauzbus AgTo aq-4Aqpano.zddp
pup oq paggiuxgns aq TTegs supTd buTpe.ab TpuT3 ags 'TT
•dpu[ Tpuz3 agg 90 TPAOadde oq joTjd sasodand buzpuoq
b
Jo3 agpmTgsa gSOO UOTgonJgsuoo apuTPJP pup buzPp.zb
Tpgog agq aaauzbug AgTO agq oq gzutgns TTegs aapTAzpgns 'OT
•sagou
pTes 30 Tenoaddp agngTgsuoo qou scop dpm sTgg 30 Tenoadde
agg pup ATuo Tpngdaouoo azp deux anTgpquaq buTgsan
agq uo uMogs saqou uoTgon.zgsuoo pup sbuTmEaP TTpgap ags •6
• sgTu jad
buzpTznq 3o aoupnssT oq joTjd jaeuibug AgTz) aq-4Aq
panoaddp pup oq paggTuzgns aq TTegs supTd buTjagmnu asnog • g
•spaip apoo dzz OOTAJOS Tpqsod s,jpg puompTQ 3o AgTD
agq UTggTM sgaa.zgs buigsTxa agpoTTdnp qou TTegs sauieu
gaa.zgs •dpuz TpuT3 agq 3o Tpnozddp oq zoTzd Tpnoiddp
PUP MaTAa.z AgTO .103 paggTutgns aq TTegs sauzeu gaa.zgS -L
• Tpnoadde dpuz TeuT3 og JOT.ad aeauTbug AgTO agq
Aq panojddp aq jjpgs supTd quau[anoiduiT uTp-Tp iu.zogs pup
jamas 'gaaags 'uoTgpbTJlT 'buTdpospueT 'buTppab agTs TTS' '9
•AgTanoas agpTadoaddp
agq qsod TTpgs pup AgTD agq ggTM quaUaaJbp UOTSTATpgns e
OguT .zaqua TTpgs J9pTATpgns deli TpuT3 agq 3o JpAOjddp agq
oq JOT.ad AgTo agq Aq pagdaooe pue a8PTATpgnS Aq pagaTdmoo
uaaq qou aApg S4U9M9nojdMT OTTgnd P9JTnb9.z Aup 3I •9
-Jaauzbug
AgTO agq Ag paaznbea sp pup qoV dPW UOTSTAzpgnS agegS agq
ggTM aouepa000e uT qas aq TTpgs squauunuom A.zppunoq MaN
•TPAOaddp dpm TpuT3 oq aoTjd sApp
bUT3(JOM (OT) uaq paggTmgns aq gsnm aaqupjpnb UOTSTAzpgns
pup aaquPjPnb/gaoda.z aTgTg pagppdn uv : a;p. ooau
AqunOO agq ggTM paTT3 ST dpui TpuT3 agq TTqun uado uTPM9a
TTpgs qunOOoe agy •NOago upTd.zo3 paggTmgns ST dem TpuT3
P uagm paggTmqns aq gsnuz gsajaquz 3o aingpu pup ' S.zapjog
gsaaaquT 's2aumO aa3 TTe buTMogs a9quejPnb/4aodaa aTgTg V • c
•UOTgpoOT
sqT 3o nOTT UT deli TeuT3 aq-4 uo uMogs aq gsnm 4oa33a
gpgq oq quauzagpgs p 'aUngpu UT agPUTUIJagapUT Jo gaxupTq
ST quauzasea Up 3I •deli TpuT3 uo uMogs pup paT3TguapT aq
gsnui Tpnojddp dPw TpuT3 og JOTjd buTgszxa squautaspa TTK - Z
OT
-deux TeuT3 aqq uo uMogs seaae asn pagOTagsaa Bons UTggTM
saang3nags .zaggO ao sbuTpTTnq 3o uoTgoaaa aqq gTgTgoad oq
ggbTa aqq AgTD aqq oq agPOTpap TTegs aauMO aqy •p.zezeq
OTbOToab oq goaCgns ,lea-IVasn pagOTagsag„ se deux TPuT3
aqq UO p94POTPUT aq TTegs aaauTbug AgTD aqq Aq panoidde
se pageuTuzTTa aq gouueo gOTgM saTaepunoq govaq anTgequaq
buTgsan aqq UTggTM spaezPg OTbOToab paT3T4uaPT TTV '8T
•gsTbOT090 paaagsTbaa PUP aaauTbUH TeOTUgOagOaD
pa.zagsTba.z 'aaauTbua ITnTZ) paaagsTbaa eTUao3TTeJ
P Aq padutegs pue paubTs aq gsnuu (s)ueTd buTpPaC) 'LT
•sueTd aqq
04UT pagPaodaoOuT aq TTegs gaodaa TPUT3 aqq UT paT3TOads
)jJoMggaea TeTpautaJ TTS.' •sgaodaa A60TOeb buTaaauTbua
pue sTTos paTTegap TeuT3 agg 30 suOTgepuautuzoOaa
aqg ggTM aOueTTduzoo uT paubTsap pup geuzao3
„g£ x „vZ a uT paaedaad aq TTegs sueTd buTpeab TeuT3 '9T
•deux TeuT3 aqq 3o uoTgepaooaa
pue sgTmied buTpeab Aue 3o aouenssT oq aoTad aaauTbua
AgTO aqq Aq panoaddP pue paMaTnaa aq gsnut suoTgepu9uM009a
pup sbuTPUT3 pageTaa sTTos pue TPOTugoagoab TTV
•aseq P se ueTd buTpeab TeuT3
aTeos-0� agg buTsn deux TeOTugOagoab pagepTTOsuoO
P UO Umogs aq gsnui suOTgenPOxa AaogeaoTdxa
pue sapTTspuPT buTpnTOuT Pgep OTbolOab TTV
(3)
•aaauTbua AgTO aqg Aq panoaddP se sTsAIPUP Aq
pauiaT3uoo aq TTegs sadoTs pasodoad TTP 30 AgTTTgegS
(a)
•adOTs Teangeu sOOPTdoa gPgg TTT3 TPTpautaa
buTpnTOuT gaodaa TPOTugOagoab aqq 3o gaPd se
pazATPue aq TTegs sadoTs TTT3 TTP 30 AgTTTgPgs ssOJD
(p)
•aaauTbua AgTO aqq Aq
panoadde se paquauzaTduzT saanseauz TeTpamaa aadoad pue
pauT3ap aq TTegs MOTS sTagap ao3 TPTguagod 3o seaav
(a)
-sueTd buTpeab aqq uo paUT3ap ATaPaTO aq TTegs seaaP
Teangeu OguT buTpeab TeTpautaa Aue 3o quagxa aqs
(q)
•buTpeab buTanp pT9T3 aqq uT uOTgPOT3Taan
o-4 gOaCgns uoTgegaaT daaquOTbOTOab „as*D -4s-Tom"
P ao3 paubTsap aq TTegs saansPauz uOTgPTpautaa ITOS
(P)
:buTMOTT03 aqg 'og pagTMTT aq you gnq 'ssoappP
TTegs gaodaa aqy •PTuao3TTPZ) 3o agegS agq Aq pasueoTT
gsTbOToab PUP aaauTbua TeaTugOagoab paaagsTbaa P Aq
paaedaad aq TTegs gaodea pTPs PUP TenoaddP aO3 aaauTbua
AgTJ aqg og sauTTapTnb AgTO ggTM eDURTTdmoo uT paggTmgns
aq ITPgs gaodaa AbOToab PUP sTTos paTTPgap P IX09W UQTd
ao3 ueTd bUTpPab aTPOs-phi aqq 3o IPggTmqns 3o autTq aqq gid -ST
•gaodaa
TeOTugOagoab TeuT3 aq-4 Aq paaTnbea sP guamaOPTd TTT3
oq aoTad panouzaa ATagaTdmoo aq TTegs sTagap apTTspuPT TTV - tT
•dvK anTgPguas
buTgsan panoadde aqq ggTM 9ouPwjo3uoo TPTquegsgns
uT aq TTegs ueTd buTpeab TeuT3 pue asToead aqs
TT
•abeuTPap pagEZaj
TTP 3o TpsodsTp pup aOUPgdaooE ao3 sp.TEpuEgS saTabuV
sol 3o AqunoZ) LjgTM aOuepaOOOE UT PUP aaauTbus AgTo agq
Aq paaTnbaa sP paTTPgSuT aq TTPgTa
s S2TgTTOp3 b.T
PUTEp TIV
•TPAOaddP dPm TPuT3 oq aoTad SXJOM oTTgnd 3o quautgaedaQ
AqunoZ) SaTabuV sOZ agq puP aaauTbus AgTQ agq Aq pano.Tddp
pup oq paggTmgns aq TTPgs gpuzao3 gaags ,gEx„f7Z e uT supTd
quauzanoaduxT UTPap utaogs TPUT3 pup Apngs abPUTPap TPUT3 K ' GZ
•saTgTTToP3
Sq.T Og UoTgo9UUOO a0 APM-30-ggbTa SgT UTggTM XJOM a03
paaTnbaa sT SIZii2isliiD utoa3 gTuzaad 'd • saTgTTToP3 sgT og
UOTgoauuoD aO APM-3O-ggbTa sgT UTLI4TM xaoM Jog paaTnbaa
ST goTagsTQ ToaguoD pooT3 AqunOD agq uzoa3 gTuzaad v '9Z
•dum TpuT3
agq uo uMogs speap asn pagOTagsaa gons uTggTM saangonags
aa,ggo ao sbuTpTTnq 3o uoTgOaaa agq gTgTgoad og ggbTa
agq AqTO agq oq agPOTpap TTPgs aauMp ags •paezeg poOT3
oq goaCgns „Paay asn pagOTagsag„ SP pagpaUTTap pup dua
TPuT3 agq uo uMogs aq TTPgs aaauTbug AgTJ agq Aq panoaddp
Se pagPuTUXTTa aq gouupo gOTgM saTappunoq dpw aATgPguag
agg UTggTM SUOTgEOOT paEZEg pooT3 p9T3T4u9pT TIV 'SZ
'goTagSTQ ToaguoQ pooT3 Aqunoo saTabuv sol
agg PUP aaauTbua AgTO agq oq AaogoP3STgPs sgUOMOSPO UT
JO APM-3o-ggbTa gaaags agq UTggTM pagon.Tgsuoo aq pTnogs
saT4TTToP3 abpuTPap uzaogS •aaauTbus AgTZ) 3o UOT-40E3STgPS
agq oq dpuz TPUT3 agq UO APM 30 sggbTa aO/pup s4uaM9SPa
AaPssaOau MOgs PUP agPoTpap pup papzPg pooT3 agq anoutaa
og s9T4TTToP3 abeuTeap apTAOad TTPgs aapTATpgns agy *tZ
•aaauTbus AgTQ agq oq paggTuzqns PUP pauTPggO aq TTPgs
auxPg pup gsT3 3o guauzq.TPdaQ PTuao3TTPD agq ggTM quautaaabP
UP PUP saaauTbug 3o sdaoo' AMJV agg moa; pauTPggo
aq TTPgs gTuzaad VOV P 'paq uQaags auTT anTq 'S'J'S'Il Aue
OquT TeTaageu[ TTT3 aO pabpaap AuP 3o quameopTd oq aOTad 'CZ
•sgTutaad buTppab 3o aoupnssT oq aoTad aaauTbua
AgTO agq Aq panoadde aq TTPgs uPTd Toaquoo uoTsoaa uy *ZZ
•pagsanbea sT gTmiad
buTpTTnq P gOTgM aO3 Taoapd P UTggTM ao 'buTAPaT 'aagua
SMoT3 abeuTPap oq goeCgns aq APm gPgq Teoapd Aup uodn
UOTgonagsuoo ao3 SgTutaad buTpTTnq 3O aoupnssT oq aoTad
paTTPgsuT aq TTPgs saTgaadoad papTnTpgns agq buTgoagoad
PUP buTaagPMap ao3 AaPSsaOau squaucanoadUT abPuTPap TTV 'TZ
•aaauTbua AgTO Dqq Aq panoaddu sp dPw TPUT3
agq uo uMogs pup pagpauTTap aq TTPgs sTaoapd quaoPCpe
.Tann ao oquo aageM abeuTpap 3o TpsodsTp jog squauzasPg 'OZ
•(s)gTutaed buTpeab 3o aoupnssT agq oq aoTad
PUP TPAoaddP deur TPuT3 Og aoTad aaauTbua AgTZ) ;aq-4 go
uOT40e3ST4eS agq oq sTaoaed TTE buTaageMap 103 AaesSOOau
saTgTTToP3 abpuTPap TTP 3O uOTgaTdmoo buTaaquPaPnb
pagnoexa quamaaabe up pup pagsod aq TTPgs AgaanS '6T
ZT
aauMo -AgTO aqq Jo uOT40PJSTgPS aqq oq dum TPUT3 aqg
uo ageaUTTap PUP sauPT aaT3 ao saATap agPATid Aue Tagpq '8£
aaauTbug AgTO Aq panoaddP sP Apngs
oT33Paq papuamp uodn pasPq dPm TPuT3 agg 90 TPAoaddu oq
aoTad -dIa panoadde agq oq quensand paaTnbaa SquautanoaduiT
TPubTs aaggo 30 aaegs aTP� sgT Aed TTegs aaptATpgnS 'GE
-aaauTbua AgTO aqq Aq panoaddP
se Apngs oT33Paq papuauze uodn paseq TPAoadde them TPuT3
og aoTad pPog UOAueO Paag PUP a9puT3ggPd gP squamanoaduzT
TPubTs JOJ qunouzP aaPgS -TTPJ sqT APd TTPgs aapTATpgns '9£
-aaeuTbug AgTO aqg panoaddP asTMaaggo ssaTun
GT uPgq aageaab ou adoTs uznwrxem e LjgTM pup guamaAPd
go gaa3 ZT gqTM 'gaaj 5T go ggpTM mnuzTulm P gqTM „SuTSPg
guPgnTTOd uegan„ TTP oq papTAoad aq gsnm ssa00P aPTnoTgan -5£
•aaauTbug AgTO aqq Aq pagoaaTp asTMaaggo
SP ao aaauTbus A4TO aqq Aq panoaddP PUP aaauTbua STTos
paaagSTbaa PTuao3TTP0 a Aq paaedaad gaodaa sTTos gqTM
a3uPpa000P UT sgaaags TTP uo gUOM9APd pup asPq gonagsuo0 •tic
-aaauTbug AgTO aqq Aq panoaddP
ssaTun %ZT 3o adOTs utnutTxeut P pa90xa TTPgs gaaags ON ' E£
-paaTnbaa sgTuuaad aaggo AuP
og UOTgTppe UT aOT330 S,aaauTbug AgTO agq UOJJ pauTPggo
aq TTPgs gTuaad uoTgonagsuoo P Pup pTPd aq TTPgs s993
'APM-JO-ggbTa oTTgnd UT pautao3aad buTaq xaoM Aue og aoTad ' Z£
'TPAoaddP dPm TPuT3 04 aoTad 'sguautanoaduzT gaaags
agPATad ao/puP oTTgnd agq go uOTgaTdmoo buTaaquPaenb
pagnoaxa quamaaabP up pup pagsod aq TTegs AgTanoes
•aaauTbua AgTO aqg Aq panoadde pup og paggTutgns aq
TTegs 'aaauTbus TTATO paaagsTbaa PTUao;TTPO P Aq poaedaad
'gPuiao3 gaags „g£x„�Z P uT SUPTd guamanoadurr gaaags •T
-AouPdn000
3o 94P0TJT4a90 3o a0uenSST og aoTad 'spaPpuPgS AgTO ggTM
90UPPJ000P UT TPAOaddP jog aaauTbug AgTO aqq oq paggTmqns
aq TTPgs g0e9 jog sguTod aouaaajaa aTgPanp (t) anog pup
gas sguauzanouz TTP uaaMgaq saTq aqq bUTMogs S94Ou AananS
•3o9aag4 SguabuPq 3O UOTgOasaaguT Jo sgUTod agg -To sananO
3o buTpua PUP buTUUTbaq agg xaem og puP saTaepunoq goeaq
ggTM sgaaags 90 UOT400SAaquT 'sgaaags 3o SUOT409sa94UT
aqq qP qas aq TTPgs sguauzanouz auTTaaguaO gaaags MaN '0£
-dPuz TPUT3 aqg 3o TPAoaddP oq aoTad 'SgU9ManoadmT
OTTgnd TTP go sasodand buTpuoq jog agPMTgsa 4so0
TTPgap aqq aaauTbua AgTO aqq oq gTmgns TTPgs aapTATpgns '6Z
-deux T PUT 3 agg
uo uMogs sauTT qoT oq puodsaaao0 TTPgs saTaepunoq asPgd
-aaeuTbua AgTO agg 3o uOT40e3STgPS aqq og uOTgOagoad
abeuTPap Pup saaMas Jog TTP34no aadoad 'ssa00P Aaepuooes
aansse oq saTaepunoq asegd aqg puoAaq pagaTdmoo aq
TTegs sguauzanoadutT abeUTPap PUP 'aaMaS 'gaaagS quaTOT33ns
P
'asegd quamdoTanap Au90 UOT4PZTTeuT3 oq aoTad '8Z
£T
•deu TPuT3 aug 90 TPnoaddP
oq aoTad aaOUTbua AgTD agq Aq panoadde pup oq paggiugns
pup sguamaaTnbaa AgTD ggTM aouppaoOOP UT peapdaad
aq TTL -14S supTd buTdTags pup buTubTs ToaguOO oT3Jeas '6%
-aaauTbua
AgTO agg Aq paaTnbaa aq APm se TPnoadde ao3 AgTZ) agg
oq paggTmgns aq TTpgs subTsap gubTs go auTT uoTgoasaaquI
•IPnOaddp
deux TPUTJ oq JOT -Td squamanoadur OT33Paq Jo UOTgajdmoo
buTaagupapnb pagnoaxe quamaeabe up pup paqsod aq TTPus
AgTanoag •aaauTbua AgTO agg Aq panoaddp pup oq paggTmqns
pup gpmaog gaaus ,g£x„-VZ P UT aaauTbug OT33Pas paaagSTbaa
P Aq paapdaad aq TTPus suPTd guamanoaduT OT�3pay 'Gig
•uoTgPTOossP saauMoomou a Aq
pauTpquTpu pup pagpaado aq TTPgs JO 'SgOTagsTp buTggbTT
AqunoZ) au -4 oguT paxauuP aq TTPus squbTT gaaags ags
•aaauTbua AgTo aug Aq panoadde sp pup spappupgs AgTO aad
og paaTnbaa se sgaaags TIP bUOjP squbTT gaaags gonagsuoo
-aaauTbua AgTD agq Aq P@JTnbaj
aq Apm su ao spaepupgs AgTz) oq qupnsand suoTgOasaaquT
TTP Pup saauaoO TTP gP sdmpa aTPuOTaagM ganjgsuoo •5li
-aaaUTbUR AgTO agq Aq TPnoadde
oq goaCgns spappupgs AgTo aad saaggnb pup gano gonagsuoD •��
-aaaubua AgTo agq Aq p9409JTP sp UOTgeTOOSSV
s,aauMoamog p 'UT paoeTd aq TTpgs sguamaspa adoTs
pagpOTpap aqs -dPm TPUT3 agg go uoTgppaoOaa ao TPnoaddP
oq aoTad 'aaeuTbua AgTo' agq Aq paaTnbea sp AgTD agq go
aonpJ uT pPog uOAuP3 Paag buOTP squamaspa adoTs agPOTPOC -£{l
•dPY1 gopay anTgPquas
buTgsan agg uTggTM punoabaapun aq TTPgs sauTT AgTTTgn TTK 'Zi'
•AOupdn000 go
9gPOT3Tgaao p go aouenssT oq aoTad aaauTbua AgTO agq Jo
uoTg0123sTgPs aq-4 og subTs auPu gaaags ITPgsuT PUP apTnoad 'Tf7
-a99UTbua AgTO agq Aq panoadde
SP PUP spaPpuPgs AgTO aad gOPag anTgpquag buTgsan agg JO
abe4uoa3 agq buTUToCpp pup gnogbnoagq sxTPMapTs gOnagsuOD '0t,
-dem TeuTJ
agq Jo UOTgppaooaa oq aoTad aaauTbua AgTO agq Aq paaTnbaj
SP abEUTPap adoTs pup gaaags ao3 papeau squamasea aaggo
PUP squauanoadmT abpuTpap ao3 spuoq qsod -To gonagsuoz •6£
•sggbTT gaaags pup 'saaggnb 'sgano 'apTs auo
UO sxTvm9PTS 'og pagTMTT qou qnq 'buTpnTOuT 'SPJPpuPgs
AgTO 114TM 80UPP2000E uT 114PTM TTn3 sqT Og gaaags
anoadmT TTPus aapTnTpgng •Aappunoq gOPaq anTgpquaq
buTgsan ATaagsaM aug oq ppog uoAupZ) pang moa3 gaaags
OTTgnd agg dPm TPU -1; aug uo agPOTpap oq aag90 TTPgs
VT
•buTquuab Oq
aoT-ld aaaUTbus AgTO aqq Aq panoaddp aq TTpgs saTuleduoo
AgTTTgn aq-4 Aq paaTnba-1 sguauasea •spappupgs Aupduoo
AgTTTgn aATgoadsaa aqq gqTM eOupp-loOOP UT 'Al aTgpo pup
auogdaTaq 'aamod OT-lgoaTa 'sleb 'a8IPM buTpnTOUT 'Taoapd
goes oq saoTA.zas k4TTTgn puno-lbaapun agleapdas ap?Woad 'GS
'gU9mq-ledaQ aaT3 pup GMM 'aaauTbug AgTo aqq Aq pa-lTnbaa
aq Aleu se smoT3 a-lT3 pup oTgsatuop Tlegog aqq aglepouuoOOP
Oq SUOT4eOT3Toads (QMAM) gotagsTQ -lagpM Aa -[TPA gnUTQM
oq butp-looOP uragsAS J94PM buTgSixa aqg oq squaM9AO zdmT
AJPsS9O9u aqq 3o uozgonxgsuoo buTaaqule-lenb A4T3 aqq
gqTM quauiaa-lble quautano-lduzT UP 04UT aaqua ao ' gon.zgsuoo
TTpgS -lapTATpgnS aqq 'TPAOzddp dleu TPuT3 og aoT-ld '95
pue aMAM 'aaaUTbu A T a o uoT Ole sT'gpsaaq-lledaQ MOTS
� g,� qq 3 q 3 q LIg og sr''�oT3
a-lT3 pue OTgsautop Tpgog agq agppoutut000p oq pazTs aq TTpgs
SUTeut aagpM ags •quauq-lpdaQ ajT3 Aqunoz) saTabuV sol
aqq Aq POUTuz-lagap se uotgleoOT pule adAq aqg 3o squeapAq
9-lT3 apnTOUT TTlegs uagsAs aqs •aaaurbua AgTO aqq
Aq pano-lddle pup papTAo-ld aq gsnu 'suoTgeoT3Toads (aMAM)
goTagSTQ aagleM AaTTPA gnuTPM oq paubTsap UOTsTAip pupT
aqg UT sTao.zed/sgoT TTP aA-las og sOT4TTTOP3 queuaq-lndde
gqTM uIagsAs Ja4Pm p Tpno.zddP deux TPuT3 Oq JoTJd • SS
•spappupgg goT.zgsTQ UOTglegTUPS AqunOD
Pule quamq.zedaQ SXJOM OTTgnd AqunoZ) saTabuv soq 'AgTZ)
agq gqTM aoupp.zODOP UT uagsAs Jamas aqq gonagsuoo TTlegs
'asuadxa pup gsoO aTOs s,aapTATpgnS qP '.zapTATpgnS aqZ *VS
•dPut TpuT3 aqq uo uoTgvoTpap -lo3 pa-la33o pup dpur TpuT3
aqq uo umogs aq TTpgs sauTT Nun -1-4 pue uteuz -lamas TTP
ao3 squauasea agpTadoaddp pup goTagsTQ aOupuagUTPw -lamas
pagPpTTOSUOD AgunOo aqq OguT paxauule aq TTpgs saTaPpunoq
deur aATgpquaq agq UTggTM paap aqs •sgTuaad buTpTTnq
3o aOUPnssT oq JOT -id gOT.zgsTQ UOTgpgTuPS AgunO'D pup
AgTD aqq uO-l3 (s)4Tutaad uoTgoauuoo uTpggo TTpgs zaump aqy •£S
•deu TpuT3 aqq 3o
Tenoadde oq aoT-ld 'quamgaledaQ sxaoM oTTgnd Aquno* saTabuV
soz pule g0TJ-45T(I UOTgpgTUPS AqunoQ 'aaawrbug AqTZ) aqq
Aq panOzdde ggdap puE apeab 'azTs aqq 3o aq TTpgs uagsAs
ATPS 'uragsAS JOMaS gOT.zgSTQ -lo AgTD aqq og pagOauuoO
aq TTpgs qoP-lg aqq buTAJas uagsAs Jamas AalegTups
aqy •sauTT qoT aaggo AUR sso-lO qou TTpgs gOTgM Tpa94PT
-lamas agleapdas P Aq pan -las aq TTpgs gTun buiTTamp goleg 'ZS
'-laauTbUa AgTO aqq 30 UOT40e3ST4PS
agq oq paATosaa aq gsnu uzaTgo-ld aqq 'AgTOedpo
4uaTOT33nSUT 3o aq oq puno3 sT MagsAs aqq 3I •uOTSTATp
puPT STgq UT S -lamas agq ao3 TTle3gno aqq sp pasn aq oq
uragsAs abPJaMas aqg UT aTgeTTeAP ST AgTopdpo gpgq A3Ta9n
oq .zaauTbuEI AgTZ) agq oq Apngs ea -le camas AapgTups p
gTuu{ns TTpgs aapTATpgns aqq Tenoidde deur TPuT3 oq aoTad 'TS
•aaauTbus AgTO aqq
Aq panoaddle SP papTAoad aq gsnu ssaoop gaaags Aappuooas '09
ST
•gOleaq 044 90
Aaepunoq ATaag4nos aqq buOTe 966T 'ST jaquiagdas PagpP
gTgTLixS uo pagoTdep se amagq buTdeOspueT pus uOTgeTnpun
TTPM XOOTq 'Xopggas adpospupT apTM 4003 9T mnUTUTM
'NIPMapTS buTJapuleaui e agpaodaoOuT TTeus gupOTTddle aqL 'Z9
'TOOgOS aTPPTW aquTOd ugnoS aqq oq ppoa ssaOOe aqg 90
apTS g4nos aqq buOTP seeaq 3o quamaopTd aqq ageaodaoouT
oq 3jegS ggTM xaoM oq paa.able Seib quaOTTdda aqs *T9
-40TJgSTQ aagpM AaTTeA gnuTeM a44 3o
suoT4eOT3TOads aqq oq paubTSap pule aeOUTbug AgTD aqq 3o
UOT40e3ST4eS aqq 0-4TTP'aageM pauzTETOa.T 90 AgTTTgaTTEAa
_4o 9UITq qe Reap uouzuzoo padpospueT pauTequTeuz
UOTgpTOOSSe , SjaUMOaUIOq aqq UTT44TM e9ae L(Oe9 u0 SaOTAaaS
OTgsauiop-uou 30„aano gOgTMs„ gTutaad oq paubTsap aq
TTetjs uiagsAs aqy • TaAOjdd2 deur TeuT3 og aoTad ' 4opjjL aiig
3o SUOTgaod padpospuleT eaje uounuoo pauTeguTeut UOTgpTOOssp
,s.zauM68mOL1 TTe og .zageM pauzTeTOaa 3o A.zaATTap 90 9Tgedeo
sauTT aoTA.TaS pup uTPM Jo UOTgeTTegsuT aangnj atI4
suOTgebTTgO uOTgpTOossp ,sa9UMoautou OLiq oquT ageaodiODUT
eoTTdde aqq asTnbaj og 4gbTa at;g sanaasaa
Pup ueTd oq gLI
AgTO 8114 'aaauTbuS AgTD 9114 kq uoTgpuTuzaagap a uo paseg -09
•AgTO attq og paggTmgns aq TTegs goaCojd
pasodoad aqq anaaS oq aTgeTTeAE aq TTTM JO 9JP S9T4TTTOle3
agenbape gptiq buTgegs 9TgeOaagul sauor pule DDS 'aDS
'Sys 'goTagsTQ zageM AaTTeA gnuTeM uzoa3 SUOTge3T3TgJ90
uaggTaM 'deux TeuT3 at;g 3o TpggTuzqns oq a0Tad *6S
•aauMO AgTTTgn aATgoadsaa aqq pup aa9UT6ug
AgTO aqq 90 UOT40PJSTgles aL14 oq S9T4TTT4n agTs-uo
buTgsTxa Aue punOJbaapun pup agpOOTaa TTegs aapTATpgns 'ss
p 324
Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Ma
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
..131 e
1 r.»)f a rerlso roma r. qr3 ;" i I .•.:e
t 11 '' . 't Yin• •-»f3' .-»S/ r-)f)r �� •r•t_ .. NOTES
r , 1 ,
ir_)feq•,Ir¢ .u.w....e. r :::�.: ••..w
I.
' `' . - •+rK • --ib _-_ _..— •�. �• ,r.r
i P.7110Iil r.la v �' I I jS
, I.»>O I•)Stf , I -)HO I.!!!.e 7 tt377 4, y ss ..lrl
•a\ /.n70 r- /HC r.l O r. )SIJ --
\ 3 _
`• :\1'r\\ ,\I-rr •11i I.»ft r� � �1 a... .. .,.....
,\. \ ,••\ • r. !Il _ _ _ Ti �1 1 rT��--y'`�I11}- , 1L
LEGEND: M IT RAOAMY_
` \• , A. 1•• I - _ J•y _ _-��._'-' I- . . SI!f I ,I�` 1 _4 nml vw wore
Is
`\ i O'1 1 -e P -f+, Sr)1 EQJ r
e r.»Ao .�) o `A\nnn7o -n) - ••
VICNITY MAP
_ ,` /-�..�Jr/�f/�/J--.LIA�:�Sr"'�.��Tj•- L 7 i/ Y yr, (j I j/�/''�['•- I �i i i J\ r..,i . � —.,-- J
i � � _ +�•!k,( f' ��:���t°SF1i\`"_Y�i 1`I�1 / I � � '1 Y`;-i--i�.�,`�•'}:�; A ;y .r ;J. � a- - �..�..... O I + /
. i ,,, f, • �. ' �� r•. W. .... r.. ... s.,. �.
_ •� 1 _ ( 't \I. •\ LEGAL DESCRPTION
1 '•{ 1'• I I ,� \` �•, ••�',` c�'- STATEMENT OF OWNERSNP
� wAr. W v ru<Ywa.e q w HK u
PROPERTY OWNER$ PROPERTY OWNEIC
LOT SUAIMAEY mmiko w sow Off Of OL A Dp W
n aua e.
IM Ir IM 4iwY � w�fA
lye fyll y11 w'iulirw „�
1 JM fH
nweel fnn) rEOrgN
_ yy1�. PREPARED ■Y:
-J`-i."j :iWi ACffAQ A1MWY `•� __ _e. lr _ SI I., 1 I ,y,,ry 11111 ILIAIIS III ,--I-
-)."jU-_ rF ) r J
-1-_7.1{1-/,Isi~"y.- - N::� � �, �w.�
-r7:Iitw�; u _f Vlt=ee>«� -- - -'• `'•t '*,
--b--.III -1,1J, ;,Eu f.r. ..... ..... .....
-'ll— /,»,-.»1 ewrl. •.r "-'• M«w • I. •�+ M.r rY.Y ar...r
H'- _i.lb 'r,ltA Nr--Ar.r/Iw IlN•
-14 iI,IN 7l,flt
_Il_-I1`H 11yJH
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 52203
3-6
upTd a94spy4 aguTOd ggnOS aqg 3o aoupTpq aqg pup goeEoad
pasodoad agg 3o uoTgpOOT aqg qno quTod oq STpnsTA pasn
aH 'paoOaa aqg OguT gaodaa 33pgs aqq ppaa oua3a4SaQ/QQo
T69Z6 Vo 'OCaTn
uoTssTK '0£Z agTnS 'saTquzpg spq
98ZLZ 'OrIrI 'sagpgsg gsaao PuouipTQ :qupOTTddV
L08Z6 FID
'MTagPUV 'uTgsny ggaOH 096 'suoS pup
OaaToav pup Ivo 'apg puouzpTQ 'aATJQ
A9Tdoo 'a 099TZ 'apg puouzpTQ 3O AgTo :aaumo Agaadoad
'Ppog a9puTJg4Pd 90
ggaou ppog uOAUPD pang 3o apTS gsaM aqq uo p94POOT OOVZ£
gopas OATgpquas buTgsan 90 £6 pup Z6 sgoq Jo uoTsTATpgns
aagganj p ST Tpsodoad sTgs 'buTdpospupl pup sgaaags
ao3 sgoT paaaggaT (9) xis pup guamdOTanap TpTquapTsaa
ATTuzp3 aTbuTS aOJ sgoT Paaaquznu 9T oquT agTs aaop ssoab
£'9 p apTATpgns oq gsanbaa p sT SOZZS 4OW21 aATq$guas
buigsaA OZO'9T'TZ UOT409S epoo uotsTAipgns oq quunsand 'T
:9NIHVaH oI'IHnd
•sTuuaQ ToapD Ajpgaaoas buTpaooag
PUP 'TTepng me-ITTTM AauaoggV AgTO 'nbunq
uuV aauupTd gupgsTSsv 'uosugor auTaaggpo
aauupTd aoTuaS 'zguaM abaoao aaauTbug
AgTD/S4AOM aTTgnd 90 aogOaaTQ 'Oup3agSaQ
sauzpr aogoa.zT(J quamdOTanaQ AgTunimoo : quasaad OSTK
snupwow aauoTssTututoo :guasgv
'buo3 pup ppgOS pup saauoTssTMUIOZ)
'P4OTzng uputaTpgo aOTA 'baaquaPToo upuzaTpgo :guasaad
: rI'IKO r qou
'pxOTzng
URMaTpgo 80TA Aq aOupTbaTTV 90 abpaTd aqg UT P9T SPM aOuaTPnp aqs
:3oNKIJ3' rm 30 3JQ3Zd
'pTuaOJTTpo 'apg PuouipTQ 'aATJQ
AOTdoo gsp3 S98TZ 'mnTaogTPnv guamaFipupK AgTTenb aTv gspoo ggnog
aqg gp 'uz'd 80:L gp aapaO Og buTgaauz aqg PaTTpO baaquapTOD upuzaTpgo
: HHaHo OS ggyo
966T '6 URRM31d38
NOISSINHOo JNINN`PId RHI a o JNIS33x Hy7fivau
ava amoNvIQ 30 xxio 3HS a o 83SnNIYd
AOTTeA 4nuTPM 9Li4 Aq paq.zegs sem ueTd aa'4SPW aguTod
ggnoS aqg pageOTpuT aagsaT3 •aY1 •V86T aouTs Agaadoad
aATJG 9uo4SXaeZ STq UT paATT seg aq pagegs a9gs9TA TeTH
•buTaeaq oTTgnd aqq pauado baaquapToD/aTego
•AgTUnUMOO papapnb a UT44TM p9uTP4UOO aq TTTM
s4Tun aqs •upaueaaagTpaY1 aq oq pasodoad sT aJngOagTgO.ze
aqs •gaaj aaenbs 006£ oq 00V£ pup gaa3 aapnbs
OOiv£ Og OOT£ 30 SgTun apnTOUT TTTM sauTT gonpoad omg
pasodoad aqq pagPOTpuT ag •sapaA OZ ATagPUITxoaddp jog
paap aeg puouteTQ aq-4 UT Agaadoad TeT4uapTS91 padoTanap
seg MaT3 sTg p94egs 'suoS pue OaaTOJV ' •ar 'oaaTOaV Xupa3
•a4Ts aaOe £•9 aqg jog passnosTp Xaed p uaaq aanau
spq aaagg 'abpaTMOuX ST14 oq 4pgg pagpgs ag •suospaa
snOTapA JOJ qno paddoap sgoaCoad asogs •eaae aqg
jog pasodoad spm aopds uado 'UOTgTppe UI •upTd a94seuz
aaOP 06 TTeaanO aqq jog pasodoad sem Xaed 9ATsspd/aAT40p
aaop O£ V •000'SZ$ ATagpuiTxoadde o4 qunomp S993
aqg 'goaCoad gTun 9T a jog pup 000'OZT$ ATagpuzTxoaddp
oq qunouze goaCoad gTun T6 e jog saag n9TT UT
Xapd •AgTD aqg Og saa3 n9TT UT Xapd apTAoad oq paaTnbaa
sT gueOTTddp aqs •Tpsodoad aq-4 4o guauoduzoo p sp
Xaed ou sT aaagq gpqq ppgoS/0 oq papuodsaa oupjagsaa/GaD
•seaOp £•9
pasodoad aqq uo aq oq umogs sT Xapd p 3T paxsp ppgos/0
•sapnTouoo uoT4Opsupag ares
aqg ss9Tun gsTxa you TTTm dpw aqs •paATOAUT sanssT aqq
'3o qupzTuboo pup oq Agavd a sT aeumo Agaadoad buTuTOCpp
aqg ua14M ATTeToadsa 'aaumo Agaadoad buTuTOCpp up
gqTM uOTgTSTnbOe apnTOuoO 4UPOTTdde aqq gpqq suoTgTpuoo
pagegs aqq uodn paspq goaCoad sTgq uo uOTSTOap a axeuz Apuz
UOTSSTumzOD bUTUUPTd ags •aan4n3 apau aqq uT oaaTOaV 'JW
gqTM suoT4PT4ob9u ODueuxulOO TTTm AgTO aql • seaOp v aqq
3o aspgo.znd Xaas og 4Oeas SnOTAaad aqg uTggTM pauTTgno
suOT4pbTTgo sTq buTTTT3Tn3 ST OaaTOJV •aL1 •auOAup 0-4Agaadoaa a14g TTas og paaooad Aem A4TZ) aqg 'ssaooad aqq 3o
uoTsnTouoo a14q uodn paspg •AgTO aqq Aq paATaOaa Saa33o
TpuoT4Tppp ou gqTM Appoq papnTouoo saa33o go 9ouegdaooe
aq,Z •59TOu9bp OTTgnd -Tag-4o og 9Tes JOJ Agaadoad aqg
aaJJo o4 'ssaooad Aa04PTnb9a gbnoagq 'papaeooad spq A -4 -FD
aq, •suoS pup oaaTOaV utoaj agTs aaoe £•9 aqq 3o uoT4aod
aaOe V ATagpuzTxoaddp up aspgoand og J9JJO ue paATaoaa spq
AgTD 914,4 gegq baaquapTOD/aTeqZ) o4 papuodsaa oue3agsau/QQD
•uOTgnTOsaa aqq uTg4Tm
pagsTT se Tpnoadde go SUOTgTpuoo pue '40e3 JO sbuTpuT3
9144 oq goaCgns '£OZZS •oH dpw gopas 9ATgpqu9s buTgsaA go
TeAOadde TTounoD AgTD buTpuaURUOOaa uoT4nTO59a aqq qdopp
UOTSSTUTMOO buTuupTd 9144 gpqq spuaumzooaa 33e4S • eaae
UOisstumuOD butuupTd Z abed 966T '6 zegme4deS
ao; pasodo.zd saaoe aaagl •agTs pasodoxd aq-4 ;o gsam
pup ggnos saTgaadoad agpapdas aaaM Aags •uoTgpaapTsuoo
aapun KTquasaad pueT a14g ssedmooua qou pTp sjesodoad
aso141 •aoeds uado go sa.zoe OE: gnoge pup Axed oTlgnd
aaop O£ p ao3 Tesodoad a sem aaagq 'ueTd aagspw agutod
ggnoS TVUTbTao aqq UT44TM gpgq papuodsaa ouPjags9a/QQO
-quaudojanap pasodoad aqq uTggTM xapd
P ageaodaoouT oq supTd uo gueumoo oq jjpgs paAsp buo3/o
'uOTgeTOOSSV sxauM09MOH
aqq gbnoa14q pagoeaguoo AT9gPA-[zd aq TTTm aoueuaquTEtu
gaaags •Sagpb aqq gbnoagq ssaooe anew TTTm quaulgaedaQ
s,jjTaagS agq pup quam-4apdaQ axT3 aqq 'uoTgonagsuoo
-4O UOTsnTouoo uodn •saapTnoad Agajes OTTgnd
agg uaaMgaq pagPUTpaoOO aq TTTM ubTsap TeuT3 'aouenssT
gTmaad buTpTTnq og -To-rad gp14q papuodsaa ouPjagsaQ/QQo
•paap ssaoop pagpb aqq squasaadaa sgol aqq uaamqaq auTj
aq1 •sgoT padegs apjnbupgoaa guaoeCpe omg 3o sgsTSUOO
goaCoad aqq gpgg eAoTznH/Dn og papuodsaa ouPj9gs9a/QQo
•paap
UvTd a94SPW aquTOd ggnoS aqg buTsspdmooue ogogd IpTaap
up buTsn goaCoad pasodoad aqq qno paguTod ouej9gsaQ/QQo
•agTs pasodoad aqq 3o UOTgpOTJTapTO .z9g4an3 109 paASe
OH -mT14 oq butsnjuoo sT goaCojd sTgg pagpgs PXDlznH/Dn
•buTaeaH oTlgnd aqq pasojo baaquapTOD/aTpgD
•paemao3 ob oq goaCoad aqq squpm aq 'pauepTm sT ppoa
aqg .zaggagm 30 ssajpapbaa gpgg p64POTPUT aH •Pasodoad
sT gpgm uegg aapTm gaaags aq-4 uado oq aadojanap agg
Asp pup goaCoad pasodoad aqq uo ppox ssaoop moaapu p go
govdmT aqq aapTsuoo TTOunOO AgTQ PUP UOTSSTUIUIOD bUTUUPTd
aqq S4Sabbns aq gegg 2AoTznH/Dn oq papuodsaa aagsaT3 •aye
•ppoa ssaoop agg 3o bUTU9PTM aqg g4TM goeCoad pasodoad
agg 30 Tpnoaddp s,aagsaT3 -JW pagpaagTaa eAoTznH/On
•pupT Aapd sp 9Tgpsn qou ST saaop E-9 9141 •goaCoad
pasodoad agq 3o aone3 UT sT aq gpgq papuodsea a9gs9T3
•JY1 •sgTun 91 pasodoad agg go aonp3 uT sT aq 3T aagsOT3
-Jw Paxsp buo3/z) -pane agg og aTgpTTpnp aoeds xapd
aTgTssaooe agpnbapp sT aaagq gegq pageoTpuT aH •gaaags
ST14 UO OT33paq TeuoTgtppp Aup guem you PTP x14 4e144
pup „ou,, papuodsaa aagsaT3 •aye -Axed e apnTOuT pTnogs
goaCoad pasodoad aqq sTaOJ aq 3T aagsaT3 -JI4 paAse bu03/D
-pasodoad uaaq seg gpgm uegg aapTm pagonagsuoo aq TOOg0S
9TppTH aquTod ggnoS og peoa SS900e agq gpgg aaTnbaa
og UOTSSTMUIOD buTuueTd aqq paAse aH •goaCoad pasodoad
agq ggTm 999a5p aq pagpgs J9144.zn3 aH •uOTgeaodaoouT
aeq PUOUIETQ Oq JOT -id goTagsTQ TOOgOS PaT3Tun
uotsstUMoD butuusTd c ebga 966T '6 aac[me4deS
•TOOgOS aqg og Pleog
pooh pappgS u10a3 ppoi SsaOOP AJPPuooas P 3o uoTgpaapTsuoo
90 abpaTMoux Cue pPg aq 3T OuP3a4g8Q/QQD paxsP aH
'TOOgOS aTPPTH aguTod ggnoS 3o xoPq agg oguT pleoa ssaooe
AalepuoOas P bulaapisuoo aaaM 04M gaaags STg uo saaauTbua
OMg paaagunOOue ATguaOaa aq Pagegs aH •aTgTssodmT
ST poogaoggbTau s,aagS91d •aL1 UT OTJJPaq agq gPgg
g
SaaabR aH •aaTduzoDUT ST gIS s,gOaCO.d aqq pagpoipuz
aH •buTpeab .TnoguoO burpalebaa sgdaOuoO s,buog/o
ggTM sanOUOO aq Pagpgs Jag4an3 aH •P9JP Szgg anaasaad
Og saeaA 9T ao3 buTggbTJ uaaq SPq aq PagRgS aH •uteaags
agq 3o apTs buoTle sxleo 3o Moa bTq aqq pup MPaags TPangPU
aqg an.zasa.Td og apeuz aq pTnoM g.Tog ja up gRgq padoq
PPq aq gpgq p91POTPUT aH •goaCoad sTgg ao3 paaapTsuoo
aq pTnogs xaed gaxood le sdPgaad glegq pagRgs pPgOS/D
•saOuapTsaJ TPUOTgTPple
snsaan sxaed TPUOTgTppe 3o govdaT aqq auTuxaagap
oq ApngS oT-43pas R gonpuoo pTnogs kgTQ aqg 'OT33Paq
PaseaaDUT biTpaebaa suaaOuoo s,aagsaT3 •aye aaMsule og
aapao u2 •goaCoad pasodoad agg aoj paPTnoad aq upo sleaale
gTaquaaab pule aOpds uado 3T eas oq pagonpuoo aq pTnogs
satpngs sanaTTaq aH •goleaq agg uiggTM pagleaodaoouT sxaled
pup aopds uado anPq oq sanaasap A4TTPnb pup 92TS STgq
go guouzdOTanap P gPgg Pa4Paa4T9a aH •sxapd 3o paau aaTp
UT ST AqTO aqq sanaTTaq aq gpgq paglegs aH •aOUPuTpap
aOUPuaguTPK aPTsTTTH s,AgTZ) agg UT pexrnba.T sle Agdleabodog
Tuangleu agg anaasaad og buTpeab anoguoo apnTOuT
4oaCoad aq-4gpgq paxsp aH •sgoT agg JO sapTs xOPq
aqq do xleaaq oq seaaR glaquaaab pup 'sgaeags guaORCpe
aqg buOTle sAleMggPd buT.Tapuleauz 'sadOTs agPaodaoOuT oq
paubTsap aq upo guamdoTanap aqg 3T paxsu aH •guauzabuRaale
qoT aqq 3o gOPdMT TPnsTn aqg ggTM PauaaOuoO ST aq gPgg
PageOTPUT aH •aORds uado ao xapd R apnTOuT pTnogs azTS
sigg 3o guauzdoTanap R 'UOTuTdo STg UT gPgq pagegs buo3/o
•xapd aangnj IPTquagod e
sP qou pule TPTquapTsag ATTMPd aTbuS sP sgoT aaOP C-9 aqg
sOTJTguapT uRTd TPaau9D aqy -PURI' x.zpd Mau go asPgoand
ao puPT x.Tpd bUTgsTxa og sguauzanoadmT ao3 pasn aq Aluo
uPO aa3 aqy -PURI TPUOTgTppP oq pasoddo sp see; naTT
UT anTaOaa og AgTQ aq-4 ao9 aPRuz SVM UOTSTOap R 'aaojaaags
•goleaq aqq 3o spoogaoggbTau TPTquapTsaa aqq anaas PaaP
94PTPOUIUIT aqg UT saaggo PUP AaRguaMaja gnUTRM 'auTgsaegS
'xand upbeag PTleuog 'uOTgTppP UI •saTgTungaoddo
TPUOT4P9J39z saa33O ToogDSaTPPTi�I aquTod ggnoS
3o uoTgaTduzoo aqg gPgq buo3/o oq papuodsaa oule3aggaQ/QQ�
•PeaP 94EXPOUIULT agg UTggTM SaaOP aeagq JO UOTgTSTnbOR
aqq sassnOSTp UQTd TRaauao s,XgTO aqy •gOTagSTQ
TOOgaS PaTJTun gnuTeM aqq Pup A-4TQ agg Aq PanTosaa
aq oq gaA ST anSST STgy •TOOgOS 91PPTYI aguTOd ggnoS
gR sganoO sTuuag agg aepun ATquaaanO aaP XJPd auogsxapq
UOTSSTMMOD BUTUUVTd V abled 966T '6 zegmegdes
-xaed gaxood e butgeaao 3o sasodand ao3 PeAOMaa aq gTun
buTTTaMp auo geqq puemmooaa Meal qT 'goaCoad aqq uTggTM
xaed e apnTouT og ageTadoadde sT qT sTaa3 uOTSS-rMMOZ)
9T4 3I -suaaouoo s,uOTSSTUIUXOZ) agg ageaodaOoUT Aeul
gegg SuoTgTpuOo aaggO ggTM ao SUOTgtpuoo papuaunuooaa agg
g4TM Panoadde ao paTuap aq goaCoad aqq geqq ITOunoo AgTO
aqq oq puaurtuooa.z Avul uOTSSTUIUIOD agy - PagsTTdut000e aneq
oq axTT PTnOM uOTSSTMMOO butuueTd all-4 gegM 3o sTTegaP agg
Moux oq 33e4s ao3 In3dT9g aq pTnOM qI -33sgs Aq papueuze
pue p9M9TA9a aq qoa Coad aqq gegg 408JTP deal qT ' paquasaad
goaCoad aqq ggTM 9Tgegao3uzooun ST uoTSSTuzuzoZ) butuuetd aqq
3I-queoTTdde aqq uzoa3 Sgu9=00 TEuotgTppe JO3 xSe gsaT3
uOTSSTUIIUOD aqq geqq buo3/3 og pagsabbns Oue394S9G/QQO
-goaCoad aqq anoadde gouueo aq 'paquesaad
sv -Saaoe £-9 aqq 90 uoTgeaapTsuOoaa buTgsabbns
sT aq gegg baaquapToD/aTeg0 oq papuodsaa buo3/o
-Saaoe E-9 Aluo butssaappe
ST uOTSSTUIUiOD aqq geqq buOd/D paputulaa baaquapTOO/aTegD
queadoTaAOP
aqq 90 A4TTenb agg anoadmT oq 33egs ggTM xaoM aadOTanaP
aqq geqq papuammOOaa ag-panoadmT aq pTnOO quamdoTanap
pasodoad aqq geqq sT993 ag -Agaadoad sTq doTaAap
oq ggbTa s,aadoTanap aqq gsuTebe qOu ST aq pageqs buo3/o
•pageoOTaa SgueTd aqq 3o autos eas 04 axTT PTnOm
aq 'uOTgTppe ui -SgSTaogae oMq Aq paMeTAaa aq pTnogs
qT SanaTTaq aq qnq 'aTgTsea3 aq PTnoM goaCoad stgq uzoa3
Saaag XeO aqq buTqueTdsueaq geqq uTegaao qou ST aq geqq
pageqs ag -saaag xeO queTdaa oq aATsuadxa pup 4TnOT33TP
st qT gegg baaguapTo�/ateg� oq papuodsaa pegos/o
-Puooas a 3o NOET ao3 paTp uoTgom aqs -uoTgnTOSag pue
uznpueppe 2ii3 TeuT3 aqq Matnaa oq aulTq saauotsSTMUXOD aqq
MOTTe oq buTgaaul uoTSSTUIMOD buTuuPId 966T ' CZ aaqulagdaS
agg oq uzagt agg anutguoo oq uotgoul e apeul exoTzng/oA
-0T33ea4 TOOgos
agg butpaebaa a9gs9T3 -JN ggTM paaanOuoo e5[OTZn-d/DA
-butqueTdsueaq ao3
saaaq xeO 30 A4TTTge4Tns aqq butpaebaa -TT -a uoTgtpuOD
uo squeumoo sTq ao3 pegos/o Paxse baaquapTOD/aTeq'
-uotgeooT quasaad aqq UT TOOgOS aTPPTK aquTOd
ggnoS 3o butpTTnq aqq oq pagoaCgo ag page-4s pegoS/o
-Agaadoad Toogos
aqq oq peog pooh papegS uzoa3 peon a dOTanap oq suuld Niue
3o aaeMeun sT aq geqq pegS/o oq papuodsea oue3a4Sea/acD
uOTOSTMMOD butuuvTd 5 abed 966T '6 zegmegdes
'966T ' CZ jagmagdaS 04 m94T 8q4 p9nuT4uoo
PUP buTapag oTTgnd aqq pauadoaa b.zaquapToO/JTPgD
SnUPKO l : suaNOISSIKKOD : ZNSSSK
auON : SUaNOISSI1 KOD : NIVISgV
buod : suaNOISSIKKOD : SSON
b.zaquapToO/JTPgO
' pxoT zng/OA ' PpLIOS : S2ISNOISSIKKOD : SHAV
:940A TTaO TTO-d
buTMOTTo3 9qq ggTM panO.zddp spm uoTgom aql •uoTgnTOSag
Mau pup mnpuappp gIa atl-4 MaTA9J o-4 auzT-4 uoTsSTUIMOZ)
914-4 MOTTp O-4 -TOPJO uT 966T ' CZ .zagma-4daS o-4 uia-4T all -4
anuTquoo 04 PXOTzng/OA Aq papuooas 'UOT-4out p apput ppLloS/O
•aTgTsp93 ATTPOTuuo94
4Ou sT upTd buTpp.zb paSTAa.z •UT -;9T-4 ppOJ ssaoop
atlq 3o asnpoaq upTd buTpp.zb PanOaddp AppaiTP 9qq asTAaa
gouupo aq gpgq baaquapTOD/JTPgD oq papuodsaa o.zaTOJV -JK
-AgdPabodo4 TPJn4Pu atlg JO autos aAJesaid 04 upTd buTpp.zb
STLI 9sTA9J pTnoo aq JT OJ9TDJV ' jK paxsp b.zaquaPTOD/. TPgD
'OOVZE gOVJs aATgpquas buT4saA gbnOJg4 panOaddp
spm pupT 9t44 JO buTpp.zb 9144 ' Papp.zb uaaq -4aA qou sptl
pupT aqq gbnogqTp gpgq pptloS/o oq papuodsai o.zaToJV *JN
'94Ts aqq JOJ 94PTadoaddp sT 4nOAPT PupT pasodoad
atl-4 STaaJ 9LI pa-4poTpuT ag •uoT�pooT 9Tgp-4Tns azouz p
uT pupT Xapd BaTnbop 04 S933 naTT UT Apd TTTM 4upoTTddp
aqj • sasn x.zpd Jo TpTo.zauzMOO o-4 3T8s4T puaT 40u saop
pupT Oql -Agaadoad aqq jo asn gsaq aqq sT uOTSTATpgns
TPTquapTsa.z p SanaTTaq aq gpgq p94pgs .z9t44Jn3 ag • OOVZC
40P.11 3O Tpno.zddp atl-4 uT papnTouT uaaq sptl Aq-Tedozd
atl.4 jo buTpp.zb atls •A-4.zado.zd 3o aoaTd papp.zb -4pT3
P ATTPT4u9ss8 sT sa.zop C-9 8q4 4ptl4 P94p4s Oa9TOJV -JK
uOTSSTWMOD buiuu$Zd 9 abgd 966T '6 aegmagdag
ago uo buTdleospuleT papple sleg queOTTddle aqq 'uoT4TPPle
ui • sbuidnoab aeag uauzToads pule xTaMapTs aqq agepouzut000e
og 4T9quaaab padleospueT (9PTM 4003 9T) pasleaaouT
ue pue Toogog aTppTK a4uTod ggnOS aqq 04 pleou uOAUPD
Peag uzoa3 XTeMapTs buiaapuleaut le buTuTT4no oTgdeab e g4TM
peoa ssaooe ago o4 goadsaa ggTM suaaouoo ,SUOTSSTURUOD
aqq o4 papuodsea seq gueoTTdde aqq gegq p94eOTPuT
ag •paooaa aqq 04UT 4aodaa 3jle49 aqq pleaa ouel94S9Q/QQO
T69Z6 VO 'OCaTA
uoissTI4 ' O C Z aging 'saTqutleu sleZ
98ZLZ 'O`I'I 'sagle4sa 4saa0 PuouzeTQ :guleoTTddv
L08Z6 VO
'UTageuV 'uT4sns g4aoH 096 'sung pue
oaaToaV pule :VO 'aleg PuouzleTQ '9ATJQ
AOTdoo 'g 099TZ 'aeg puouzeTQ 3o A4To :aaump Agaadoad
•pleou aapuT3gged 3o
g4aou pleog uoAupo Peag go apis 4sam ago u0 pa4eOOT OOVZC
goeas 9AT4le4u91 buTgsan 90 E6 pule Z6 sgo7 3o uoTsTATpgns
aag4an3 e sT Tesodoad sign •buTdeaspuleT pue s4aaags
Jog sgOT paaa4g9T (9) xis PUP 4uauzdoT9A9P TleT4uapTs9a
ATTulle3 OTbuTs ao3 sgoT paaaquxnu 9T oqui agis aaOP ssoab
£'9 le apinipgns oq gsanbea le si £OZZS 409ZI SAT494UOI
bu-4saA OZO'9T'TZ UOT4099 apo0 uoTsTATpgnS o4 4u9nsand 'T
JNIHVaH OIZSnd a3ANISNOo
•siuuaQ ToaeO Aae49a09g buTpaooau
PUP ' T Tapnu MUT T T TM A9U-10-44V A4T O ' nbunq
uuV aauueTd 4ule4sTssV 'ZguaM 95.1090 a99uibug
A4TO/sXaOM OTTgnd 3o ao4oaaTQ 'oule3agsaa
saMl2f aogoaaiQ guamdOTanaQ AgTunuzuzo0 :quasaad osTV
•baaquapT00 UPMaTegO :4uesgV
•Plegos Pule snUPHOW
'buod saauoissTuuUoO pue 'leXOTznu ueuzaTPgD 90TA :quasaad
•buod
aauoTssTiumo0 Aq aouleTbaTTFI 3o abpaTd aqg UT PaT sem aouaipnle aqs
: aomvisaiq i ao aoaagd
-UTuaOjTTuD 'ae$ puOMUTQ '9ATaQ
AaTdoO gsles S98TZ 'uxnTaogiPnV quautabeuleyl AgTTeno aTK 4seo0 g4nOS
aqq 4e •ut•d OT:L 4e aapao og buTgaauz aqq p91Teo baaquapTOD uleutaTegO
: uaauo os ggvo
966T '£Z IdagN3Sd3S
NOISSINNOO JNINNK a 3HS ao Omilaam HyaaDav
ava allommia SIO ASIo sm ao sainmix
UI •AgTz) aq-4 Aq panoadde ATsnoTna.zd sem guauzubTTe
peo.z ssaooe guajino agq gegg papuodsaj oiaToaV • aw
•Tenomaj
9914 xeo azTutTuTm oq Agjadoad aqq go jauaoo 4seag4aou
aqq ge gTTnq aq pTnoo peoa ssaooe aqq gT paxse pegoS/0
• quaoaad
xTs og 9nT3 uegq .zagea.zb ou ST guauzubTTe qu91-= ags
• uoTgoas.zaquT aqq buTgoeoadde sassnq Toogos agepouIUIOOOV
og quaoaad OZ og gT uegg a.zotu ou go sape.zb sajTnbaa
AgTD ails • ape.zb aadaags a agea.zo pTnOm AT.zagg.zou
peo.z aqg buTAOM gegq buo3/o oq papuodsa.z o.zaTo-TV -jW
•uoTgoas.zaguT aqq
JO apTs gsomgqnos aqq uo qno agg azTuzTuTuz oil UOTgoas.zaquT
peog uoAue:) peaq aqq qe AT.zagg.zou peo.x ssaooe
aqg buTnouu go sTsATeue Jog sem gsanbea 6 .zaquiagdaS sTg
p94POTpuT ail •ggpTM gaa.zgs uinutTuTut a s.zoneg ail asneoaq
STSATeue agq gsanbaa you pTp ail gegg pagpaagTaa buo3/o
•peo.z ssaooe agg go buTuapTM
buTp.zebaJ quauzuuoo aTge.zoneg a apeut J9UOTssTURUOD e gegg
paTTeoaa ail •buTgaaux uOTSSTUIMOD bUTUuPTd 6 .zagmagdaS aqq
qe apeuz SW9MMOO OTTgnd oq buo3/o pajaagaj OJ9TOJV 'JW
•buTuapTM peo.z SSaooe go sTSATeue Jog queoTTdde aqq paxse
aauoTSSTUMOD Aue 4L-14-4TTeoaz qou pTp au pagegs buo3/z)
•pegoS -jW oq auTT Aq.zadoid ATaaggnos quaaano
sTg qno paquTod o.zaTo.zV • ays Idem TeoTgde.zbodoq agg buTsn
•UOAueo
aqq oq eouegangsTp gseaT agq sp.zogge pue 'Toogos agg oq
SSaooe 'uoTSTnTpgns agg jog ageTjdoadde gsouz ST UOTgeooT
AEMpeoj quasead agg gEgg sjaag aaeuTbua sTg p94POTPUT ail
•paaTnbaa aq pTnoM TTTg uoAueo go 4-TVAODL 'ATzag4aou
panout ST AeMpeOJ SSaooe agg gong TeuoTgTppe A.zana
aOJ gegg pauTETdxa 'suoS I OaaTOaV '.jr 'o.z9T3JV xue.z3
•UOTgnTosa.z aqq uTggTM p94STI
SP Tenozdde go suoTgTpuoo pue 'goe3go sbuTpuT3 aqq
oil goaCgns '£OZZS •off deyl goeal anTgeguas buTgsan ano.zdde
TTounoj AgTZ) buTpuauuuooaa UOT74nTOS;8j aqq gdope uoTssTunuoZ)
buTuueTd aqq gegg spuaulmooaa 33egS •suoS )3 oaaToav
oil Aq.zadoad aqq go aTes apnTouoo oil squamnoop ageT.zdozdde
aqq eapdaid oq ggegs TebaT pagoaaTp TTounOD AgTD
aqs •Aq.zadoad sqT go asego.and jog AgTo aqq Aq panTaoaj
.zaggo ATuo aqq ST g0TgM .zaggo suoS I OJ9TOaV aqq ssnosTp
oil UOTssas pasoTO UT -49M seq TTounOD AgTO aqg '966T
'6 aaquiagdaS aouTS gEgg pagegs ouejagSaQ/Q(IZ) •aueTd
s,TTeM xooTq aqq PaTaPA pue peoa ssaooe agq go aPTs ggnos
UOTOSTUMOD buTuusTd Z abud 966T 'EZ aegmegdes
s,gueotTdds agg 'uotu-rdo szq uz gpgg pagsgs aaggan3
ag • guauzgsanui szq uo uangaa p goodxa og ggbia p spg
gusozTddp agg pus asiadaague agsntad og PTOs sem �gaadoad
agg '.zanaMog -ob uodueZ) auogspupS aas og pps st ag
gpgg pagpgs aaggan3 ag -agzs agg P84TSTA pus 'sTeTaageu
p94PT91 pus gaodea 3jsgs aqq ppaa aq pagsgs snuPWON/D
•seaag
OOZ ATagpuzxoaddp 30 ssoT gau p uz sgTnsaa goTgm saaag
Ogg buzOeTdaa sz ag gegg psgoS/Z) og papuodsaa oj9ToaV *jN
•saaag 89L ATagpuTxoadds go ssoT s aq TTTm
aaagg 'goaCoad sigg 30 gTnsaa e ss gsgg pagegs ppgOS/0
-Agaadoad go aOaTd pappab APeaaTP us uo 940T
9T aO3 Tenoaddp 9AT909a og uOTssiutut00 buTuupTa aqq aaojaq
ST ag gsgg Pagpaagtaa ag•aTgzssod saaag go aaquinu
uznuzzxpu aqq anps og NaoM TTTM aq pazTspgdua oaaTOaV 'JW
•Panaasaad aq PTnOO anoab aqg
3T PaNsp ag -panouzaa aas saaag aqg uagM gsau TTTM spaTq
aqg aaagM pauoigsenb ag -sgpgzgpg buzgsau go aoupgangszp
smOTTssip autpg pus gst3 go guauigapdaa aqg gsgq
sanaiTaq aq p94VOTPUT ag •pagoagoad sT gegTgpg buzgsau
aqy -saogdsa gsabapT s,A4TD aqg ao3 anoab buzgsau p ST
PUP A4TO agg uz asuap gsom aqq sz Agaadoad aqq go aauaoo
gsamggnos agg ge pagpOOT anoab Neo aq-4 page -4s pegoS/'
-sasnq Toogos ao3 auzTout snopapzpg
aaou pup aadaags p uz gTnsaa pTnom ppoa ssaoop ATaaggaou
aaou p 'TTTJ pus gno go ssaTPasbaa gsgg pagsgs snuPWON/D
-ado-Es
apis aqq go aauaoo gsaMggnos aqq gp saaag Nso buzgstxa
aqq o-4gopdMT agg ggTM pauaaouOO sz ;DLIpagegs buo,3/Z)
•sgoT butpTTnq
OOVZB dRW gopay 9nzgpgU91 panoadde aq-4 g0a3Ja pTnom dpu
Panoadde aqq JO uOzsinag •buzPeab aziurtuiuz og Agaadoad
agg 3o uoigaod ATaaggnos agg og panou ATTpuotguaguz
spm peoa ssaOOp ag,y -pageOOTaa pup panou aq og spq gazp
aaouz 'ATaaggaou panou ST Ppoa ssaoOP agg SV -suOzgsOOT
psoa ssaOOP Tpaanas paaapzsuoO A-4TZ) ags •guaoaad OT
aapun appab gaaags p saajaad pup gueoaad ZT Jo ssaOxa ut
sappab gaaags Aus gTuaad you scop AgT3 aqs •ppoa aqq go
uoigaod ATaagsam auaagxa agg uo Agaadoad gOzagSTG TOOgOS
agg sgngp guaoaad L go appab gsadaags aqs -aOupgszp
psoa aqg JO V/£ Aj9gPuixoaddp spuaqxa pup guaoaad
E - T ST ' uotgOasaaguz ppog uoAupD pang agg gp appab s , peoa
ssaoop pasodoad aqq Begg buo3/D og papuodsaa zguaM/HD/MdQ
•aoupgangsip pupT aztuzuzu og guiodpupgs buTaaauTbua ue
uzoa3 aTgzsea3 gsou 9114 *ST' Tpsodoad guaaano agq 'uoT4TPps
UOTGSTMMO, buiuu$Td E ebpd 966T 'EZ a9qm94dsS
•sq.zadxa pTpd s,AgTO aqq Aq paquamnoop
8-Tam sainspam UoTgpbTgTUI aAigoadsa.z pup saToads
uOAUPO aqs • p.zooa.z 3o q.zodag gopdu I TpquautUOJTnua
aqq MOu ST qT pup pabuaTTEgO qou spm guautnOop
aqs •paTJTq.zaO spm q.zodag gopdutj TpquaUIUOJTnug aqq
V66T 'aunt ui •uOTgoE gpqq og saTg.zpd a.zam uOTSSTUIUIOZ)
buTuupTd quaaano aqq go saaquzaui oms •q.zodag gOpdutj
TEquautuOJTnua agg 3o UOTgpOTJTq.zaO pup Tpno.zdde goaCoad
3o uoTgppuaunuooaz E uTpagjnsa.z sbuTavaq uOTSSTUItUO�
buTUUPTd pup pagETnOJTO ATapTM spm q.zodag gopduuI
TpguautuOJTnua gJPJp aqs •upTd .zagseLl aaop 5LT TeUTbTJO
aqq 3O 4jed sp pagOnpUOO SPM sTSATpup agTS anTgsnpgxa
uv •uOTgeOTTddp agq 3o gzpd sp saanspaul uoTgpbTgTm
TpguauluO. Tnua agq buTquemaTdmT pup ssaooid sTgq bUTns.znd
ATquabTTTp sT quEoTTddp ags •sgTmaad autpD pup gsT3
ETuJOJTTED agg pup JeauTbud go sd.zoD Au av aqq .zoj paTTddp
sEq quEOTTddp aqq gpqq ppgos/Z) oq papuodsa.z oupjagsaQ/Q(iz)
•pagopdWT aq TTTm saaaq Jama3 aqq 'paDvTd sT ppoa
ssaOOE aqg gq.aou aagq.zn3 aqg sanaTTaq aq pagEgs ppgos/0
• saaa4 AT.zaggnos aqg gopdMT
ATgupOTJTubTs you saop supTd buTpvab quaaano agg uo
uMogs buTpp.zb aqq ' aanaMog • pangs aq Apul auTT Agaadoid
agq asOTO saa.zq aqq 3o autos ' gq.zou aqg oq panout SPM
ppOJ 58800E aqg JT gpqq buod/D oq papuodsai z4uaM/a3/MdQ
•buTggnO aaag xpo aqq aonpa.z pTnom
AT.zagq.zou gaaj OS peo.z ssaoop aqq buTAOUI JT paxsp bUOd/D
•saa.zg xeO Jo buTXPq
aq-4 azTMTuTUI pup sansST app.zB aqq agppommoOOE oq uoTgpOOT
pasodoid sqT uT paOpTd sem ppoa ssaoop aqy • sTpnO.zddp
snoTnaad sTq uodn paseq buTpaaooad sT oiaToaV -jW •dPW
gOpzs anTgEquas buTgsan pano.zddp aqq ggTM 90UPPJ000P uT
panO.zdde buTaq ST uPTd buTppzb aqs •dpN goe.zs anTgpquas
buTgsan panoaddp STq ggTM aOUPTTdutoo uT 00t Z£ gop-TZ
.zo3 AgTM agg Og upTd buTpp.zb p paggTuigns Spg oaaTO-TV
•.zyg •quautagpgs s,ouPjags6Q/QQ3 pagUjagTaj zquaM/aD/MdQ
•UOTSSTututoD
buTuupTd agq ;9JO39q uOTgEOTTddp aqq Oq Aq.zpd p qou
ST .zaumo Agjado.ad aqq pup buTuana sTgq uOTgPaapTsuoo JOJ
uOTSSTUMOD buTuuETd aqq ajojaq uoTgpoTTdde aqq go gapd
-40U sT gpqq A4'aadoad uo pagpooT sT quaUIUbTTE ppOJ ssaoop
ags •panO.zddE uaaq aneg seanseatu uOTgpbT4TM agg pup
STsATEUE TEquaUluOJTnua TPUTbTJO aqq go g.zpd SEM quaMUbTTP
ppoi aqy • v66T '.zagogop uT quaMUbTTP ppo.z SS900E aqq
panOaddp AgTD aqg qugq buo j/D oq papuodsa.z oupjagsaQ/QQD
•sgaojja s,gupoTTddp aqq
SagETo9adde ag PUP guautanOadulT up sT buTgaaul UOTSSTuIIUOD
buTuueTa 6 .zaqutagdas agg aOUTS sabuego pasodoad
UOTBSTUIMOO baiuusTd 6 abQd 966T '£Z aaqulagdes
'uOTuTdo sTq UT 'gOTgM T og T : Z UIOJJ adOTS aqq buTuadoags
30 AgTTTgTspa3 aqq 9UTUI.z949p oq UOTgTpuoo buTppaq
aqg xoagO Og SUOTgpbTgsanuT PTOT3 TpquauzaTddns gonpuoo
og .zaauTbua sTTOS .ao gupgTnSUOO TpOTugOagoab s,AgTD
aqg buT.ATnb9a papnTOUT aq uOTgTpuOO p gpgg paxsp buO3/O
• gopaq panoiddp ATsnOTna.zd aqq pup qoa Coad quaiino
aq-4 go Aiepunoq aqg UTggTM OTgeJ T:Z e qp peopTdai
buTaq eap saa.zq aqq gpgq ppgos/D oq papuodsaa OJ9TOJV 'JW
• Agjadoad aqq 3O UOTgjod ATaaggnos aqg uO
saa.zq gqTM a.zaj.zaquT .zaggjn3 pTnOm .zauupui p Bons uT ppoi
ssaoop agg buTnouz gpgq ppgos/o oq pauTpTdxa zquaM/Ho/MdQ
• Aq.zadoad
aqq 3o quTod AT.zagq.aou gsOm aqq qp pagpOOT anO.zb xpO
aqq aTDJTo pTnoo ppoi ssaoop aqq gegg pagsabbns pegos/D
•AqT, aqq Aq panoidde pup paMaTnaJ aq TTTM supTd
buTggbTT s,gupoTTddp agg gpgg sagpgs gOTgM papnTouT aq
upO uoTgTpuoo le q,egq p4o-rznu/z)n oq papuodsai z4u8M/H3/Mda
-buTggbTT gaaJgs azTUTuTuz og 33pgS
s,AgTD aqq pup Aupduzoo uosTpH aqq gqTM x.zoM oq Addpq
ST aq PagpOTPuT .zagq.zng aH-OTgpuzagOs buTggbTT gaa.zgs
aq-4 SagpTgTUT uosTpH pup Aupducoo uosTpH aqg oq paggTuzgns
9aP su'eTd quauiano-TduzT p94VOTPUT aH • JJpgs gqTM x-'OM
TTTM aq p94POTPUT pup buo3/D gqTM paajnouoo oaaToav -aw
•buTggbTT gaa.ags
aqg azTuzTUTuz oq qupoTTddp aqq pup-T3egs pax S12 buOd/3
•MaTn aqq aoupqua oq peo.z SSaoap aqq
go uoTgjod Aljaggnos aqq UO UOTgsPJ Tpangpu p uT paqupTd
saaag aas og axTT PTnoM aq '.zanaMOH •pagTgTq *. aq you
pTnogs MaTn aqq gpgq OJ9TOJV 'JW gqTM paJJnOUOO buOd /D
•aopds
uado aqq 3O MaTn aqq gTgTgUT TTTM Aagq 'ppOJ ssaOOP aqg
go apTs gqnos agq buOTP paopTd aip saa.zq 3Z -gOTJgSTQ
TOOgos agq og SbuOTaq peon ssaooe aqq go apTs gqnos
aqg gpgq PagpgS aH '33p4s gqTM XaOM TTTM gupOTTddp aqq
' uvld adpospupT agq oq goadsaa gqTM gpgq agpOTpuT og gxaq
UOTgTpuOO JOJ paxSP aH • saa.zq 099 ATagpuzTxo.zddp qupTd
oq pagpbTTgo ST aq gpgq buo3/o oq papuodsai OJ9TOAV 'JW
TTT3 Pup qno anTssaoxa JOJ paau aqq sagpUTuiTTa
pup saejq aqq oq gopolzT gspaT aqq SJBJJO UOT' POOT
ppoi ssaoop pasodoid agq AqM pauTPTdxa z4u8M/H3/MdQ
TTT3 pup qno pup saaaq og gopduzT gspaT
agq uT gTnsa.z TTTM su'eTd pasodo.zd agq JO UOTgpOTTddp
gpgg UL-111 aouTnuOo Og 4UPDTTddp aqg pup 3jpgs paxsp 6uo3/'
UOTssTUMOD buTuuvTd S abed 966T 'cZ zegmegdeS
agq bUOTe saeaq 3o guamaoe-[d agg agpaod.zoouT oq 33pgs
ggTM NjoM oq paeabe spg quleOTTddle aqs„ : SMOTTO3 sp plea.z
og pappe aq T9 uoTgTpuoD gegg pagsabbns ag ,-UOTSSTUIMOD
buTuuleTd aq-4 Aq panO.zddle pule paggTmgns se '966T '8T
aagmagdaS PagpP soil gTgTqxa PUP '966T '6 .zagmagdaS PageP
„FI„ gTgTgxg sle paTagleT ATaATgOaTTOO suleTd oq m-io3uo0
ATTPTqupgsgns TTpgs goaCoad aqy„ :ppa.z oq papuame
aq UOTgnTOsag 43le.za agq 30 b abled uo (P) -(S UOT-4TPUOZ)
gegg pagsabbns 'exOTzng/DA og buTpuodsa.z 'oue39gSao/aaD
•uoTgnTOSaJ
agq uTggTM pagsTT suOTgTpuOO Pule '40le3 30 sbuTPuT3
agg og goaCgns '£OZZS '0H dpN g0pzs aATglequay buTgsaA
3O Tpno.zddle TTounoo AgTo buTpuauzuzo0a z uoTgnTosa.z agq
gdope og PXOTzng/DA dq papuooes 'uoTgouz p apleuz snupWoK/D
•buTav9H OTTgnd aqg PasOTO PXOTzng/DA
'uzagT sTgq uo Neads oq pagsTM ogM auo ou buTaq a.zags
• AuouzTgsaq oT Tgnd jog paxsp exoT zng/DA
•agTuoquag uTlegUOO qou S90P UOAUPD auogSPUPS
gegg sanaTTaq aq gpgg PegoS/a oq papuodsaa OJaT0JV *JW
•UOAUPo auogspueg
3o uzoggoq agq UT gTnp3 axenbggaea ue ST a.zagq gegq
TTPOaa you saop ail gegg ppg0g/o og papuodsai zquaM/so/Mda
•aTgTssod
.zanauegm sado-[s T:Z/T T saonp3 aq geqq pagp.zagTaa
ag •saueTd buTppaq aTge.zone3un 3o SUOTg.zod aq-4 30
asneoaq sadoTs T : Z papu9MM0O8a aaauTbue sTTos aqs •.zaAnq
amoq aATgoadso.zd aqq og 4T3auaq .aagpa.zb pup buTpp.zb ssaT
UT gTnsea pTnoM goTgM sadoTs T:Z/T T 30 A4TTTgTse83 aqq
agpbTgsanuT og aaeuTbue TTATO aqg Pup aaauTbua AboToab
Pule sTTos aqq pagsanbea aq quauzdOTanap ueTd buTpeab
agg 3o sebegs TeTgTUT aq-4 UT gegg pagpgs OJ9T0JV -JN
•94TS agq JO; Sao4Op3 A49JPS agPTadoaddp apnTOuT p -[hogs
MOTAE)a aqq gegq pauOTgnpo ag • buTpp.zb peaTnba.z aonpa.z
pup saa.zq buTAps UT gTnS9a Apm goTgM sadoTs T:Z/T T 90
A4TTTgTse93 agq MaTAaJ A4TD aqq anpq Oq gSTM sTq 409TJBJ
pTnogs sagnuTm agq gpgq buo3/3 oq papuodsa. zqu9M/a3/Mda
• up -[d buTPUab qua.z.znO
agq UTggTM pegeaodaOOuT a.ze sq.zodai asags •buTssaaggnq
TPUOTgTppp aaTnbai -[TTM gOTgM adoTs agq UTggTM buTppaq
aTgvaoAle3un sagpoTpuT gaoda.a aqy •3[.zoM AboToab pule
sTTos ao3 000'09$ TpuoTgTppp up papuadxa aq obp sgquom
aa.zgq ATageuzTxoadde gpgq buog/o oq papuodsaa OaaTDaV 'JW
• TPAOmea aO; pageTs
sea -T-4 agg 3o uoTquaga.z quao.zad OL p uT gTnsa.z pTnoM
UOTBSTM 00 BUTUUVTd 9 abBd 966T 'EZ aegmegdes
September 23, 1996 Page 7 Planning Commission
south side of the access road to the South Pointe Middle
School." He further suggested that Condition 62 be added
to read as follows: "The applicant shall incorporate a
meandering sidewalk, minimum 16 foot wide landscape
setback, block wall undulation, and landscaping theme as
depicted on Exhibit "C" dated September 18, 1996."
C/McManus amended his motion to include CDD/DeStefano's
recommendations. VC/Ruzicka agreed to the amended
motion. The motion was approved with the following Roll
Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McManus, VC/Ruzicka, Fong
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Schad
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Goldenberg
RECESS: VC/Ruzicka recessed the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
RECONVENE: VC/Ruzicka reconvened the meeting at 8:53 p.m.
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 96-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 52203
A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.3 GROSS ACRE SITE
INTO SIXTEEN NUMBERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 6 LETTERED LOTS
FOR STREETS AND LANDSCAPING AND THE ADDENDUM
TO THE EIR FOR SOUTH POINTE MASTER PLAN (STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE #92081040), LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD, NORTH OF PATHFINDER
ROAD IN DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS.
1. The property owner, Arciero and Sons, the applicant Diamond
Crest Estates, LLC, and the applicant's agent, Hunsaker and
Associates, together, the "Applicant" have filed an application
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203.
2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a
duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California.
Thereafter, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted
its Ordinance No. 14 (1990), thereby adopting the Los Angeles
County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title
21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contain the Development
Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to
development applications, including the subject Application,
within the City of Diamond Bar.
3. On July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted a General
Plan. Action was taken on the subject application as to the
consistency with the General Plan. It has been determined that
the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on September
9, 1996 and September 23, 1996 conducted duly noticed public
hearings on the Application.
5. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been
made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspapers on August 19, 1996. Ninety-one property
owners within a 500 foot radius of the project site were
notified by mail on August 16, 1996. Further, additional public
notification was provided through mailings to approximately 300
property owners within the area surrounding the originally
proposed South Pointe Master Plan.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the
1
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed project
will not require major revisions to the Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Pointe
Master Plan (State Clearinghouse 192081040) which includes
the subject property, in that no substantial changes are
proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of the previously identified
significant effects; no substantial changes in
circumstances under which the project is undertaken which
will require major revisions of the previous EIR have
occurred due to indirect or new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and no new
information or issues of substantial importance which were
not known and could not have been known with the exercise
of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be
significantly more severe than shown in the previous
EIR.
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and
would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects of the project, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative;
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the
previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation or
alternative.
Therefore an addendum to the EIR has been prepared and is hereby
being approved.
4. Based on the findings and the conclusions set forth
herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a vacant parcel, approximately
6.3 acres in size located on the west side of Brea
Canyon Road, north of Pathfinder Road. The project
site is zoned Single Family Residential, R-1-15,000.
It has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (RL). The proposed map and the
design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the allowable density of development
n
permitted within the RL General Plan land use
designation, General Plans goals and strategies. This
site is not part of a specific plan.
(b) Generally, the following zones and uses surround the
project site: to the north is the Single Family
Residential -Minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-
8,000) Zone; to the south is vacant land zoned
Residential Planned Development (RPD -10,000), Brea
Canyon Road and the 57 Freeway to the east, and the
South Pointe Middle School to the west, which has a
zoning designation of (R-1-15,000).
(c) The proposed project is a request to subdivide a 6.3
gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for residential
development and 6 lettered lots for streets and
landscaping.
(d) The proposed project will not:
(1) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or
welfare of persons residing in the surrounding
area; or
(2) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment
or valuation of property of other persons
located in the vicinity of the site; or
(3) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a
menace to public health, safety or general
welfare; and
(e) The proposed site is physically suitable for the type
and proposed density of development in that it is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development features.
(f) The project site is adequately served:
(1) By highways or streets of sufficient width and
improved as necessary to carry the kind and
quantity of traffic such use would generate; the
site is adequately served by Brea Canyon Road
and private roadways will be constructed within
the subject tract which have been reviewed and
determined to be adequate to accommodate traffic
generated by this project and;
(2) By other public or private service facilities as
are required. This project has been conditioned
to provide or be connected to all necessary
public services and facilities.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed project will
not be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment
of neighboring existing or future development, and
will not create traffic or pedestrians hazards.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 has been designed
with lots and a system of private streets which are
adequate to accommodate the proposed level of
residential development.
3
(h) The design of this project will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as
well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of
materials, texture and color that will remain
aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate level of maintenance. The project has been
designed and conditioned to ensure that it will
provide a desirable environment for its residents and
the homes will be constructed providing good
aesthetic use of materials and design.
(i) The design of the subdivision and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife in their habitat, in that an
EIR (SCH #92081040) has been certified for the
project site by the City Council on June 3, 1994 and
Findings of Facts and Statement of Overriding
Considerations and Mitigation Reporting and Program
has been adopted by the City Council on October 18,
1994, which has adequately addressed any potential
impacts on wildlife at this site.
(j) The design of the subdivision and the type of
improvements will not conflict with easements,
acquired by the public at large for access through or
use of property within the proposed subdivision. The
proposed map has been reviewed by the Planning
Division and Engineering Department and it has been
determined that the proposed subdivision and any
improvements will not conflict with any on-site
easements for public access.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Application sub-
ject to the following conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to plans
collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated September
9, 1996, and Exhibit "C" dated September 18, 1996
as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission.
b) The project shall conform to the Conditions of
Approval collectively labeled as Exhibit "B" dated
September 23, 1996 as submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission.
(c) This grant is valid for two years from the date of
the City Council resolution and shall be exercised
(i.e. construction started) within that period or
this grant shall expire. A one year extension may be
requested in writing and submitted to the City 30
days prior to the expiration date.
(d) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose
until a duly authorized representative of the
4
applicant and/or owner of the property involved has
filed, at the office of Diamond Bar Community
Development Department, the Affidavit of Acceptance
stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and
accepts all the conditions of this permit.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail, to Arciero and Sons,
950 North Tustin, Anaheim, CA 92807.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1996, BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
' Joe R zicka, Acting Chairman
)� 5:�
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23RD day of September,
1996, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fong, McManus and Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Schad
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Goldenberg
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: - f
James DeStefa no, Secretary
5
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 9/23/96
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 shall not be
effective for any purpose until a duly authorized representative
of the applicant has filed with the Community Development
Department an Affidavit of Acceptance, thereby accepting all
conditions of this approval which Affidavit shall be filed
within 15 days of the date of approval.
2. All requirements of the Resolution, the applicable Zoning
District, the City Codes, City departmental policies, rules and
regulations of any State, Federal or local agency with
jurisdiction thereof shall be complied with by the Applicant.
3. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) and (c),
the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action
or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval of
the City, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37.
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Provide and locate water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as
required by Fire Department and Fire Code.
2. Fire Department access shall be extended to within 150 feet
distance of any portion of structure to be built and shown on
the final map.
3. Access shall comply with Section 10.207 of the Fire Code (all
weather access).
4. Driveways shall include, as necessary, turnarounds suitable for
fire protection equipment use and shown on the final map.
Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to
insure their integrity for Fire Department use.
5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and
accepted prior to construction of on-site improvements.
Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable
throughout construction.
6. All hydrants shall be brass or bronze and conform to current
AWWA standard AC503 or approved equal. All hydrants shall be
installed a minimum of 25' from a structure.
C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall be recorded in concert
with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400. In the event that
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400 is not recorded, Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall not be recorded as a separate,
1.
independent tract.
2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with
the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and plans approved by
the City Council.
3. Exterior construction activities (grading, framing, etc.) shall
be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Saturday, except that interior building construction activities
shall not be limited. All construction equipment shall be
properly muffled to reduce noise levels. Transportation of
equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment
shall also be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:0011 Monday
through Saturday. All equipment staging areas shall be sited on
the subject property. Dust generated by construction activities
shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during
grading activities. Use of reclaimed water shall be used
whenever possible.
4. Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not limited
to, planning, building and school fees) at the established rates
prior to recordation of the final map and issuance of building
permits.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/subdivider
shall prepare and submit to the Director of Community
Development for approval a "Buyers Awareness Package" addressing
VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 as a single development, - which shall
include, but not be limited to, information pertaining to
geologic and environmental issues regarding the property,
freeway noise, proximity to bus routes and oak tree preservation
issues, explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on
use of properties as necessary and similar related matters.
Applicant shall institute a program to include delivery of a
copy of said "Buyer Awareness Package" to each prospective
purchaser and shall keep on file in the office of Applicant with
copies to the City and a receipt signed by each such prospective
purchaser indicating that the prospective purchaser has received
and read the information contained within the "Buyer Awareness
Package."
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the variety of
materials and colors to be used on the exteriors of residential
structures shall be approved in form and color by the Community
Development Director as a part of the Development Review of the
model homes.
7. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. The use authorized by this approval shall be commenced or
construction necessary and incidental thereto shall be started
on or before the time limit specified herein and thereafter
diligently advanced on or before the (2) second year after the
expiration of City Council approval.
9. Applicant shall pay all remaining City project review and
processing fees prior to recordation of the tract map as
Em
required by the Community Development Director.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
1. As a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the
applicant shall suspend construction in the vicinity of a
cultural resource encountered during development of the site,
and leave the resource in place until a qualified archaeologist
can examine them and determine appropriate mitigation measures.
The applicant shall comply with mitigation measures recommended
by the archaeologist and approved by the Community Development
Director.
Upon initiation of grading activities, a paleontological grading
observation schedule by a Certified Paleontologist shall be
maintained when grading in bedrock units to further evaluate the
fossil resources of the site. Salvage operations shall be
initiated and coordinated with the project applicants if
significant concentrations of fossils are encountered.
2. Plant street trees as directed pursuant to the adopted street
tree plan in effect at the time of recordation and approved by
the City Engineer.
3. No underground utilities shall be constructed within the drip
line of any mature tree preserved on-site except as approved by
a registered arborist.
4. The mitigation monitoring program contained in EIR No. 92-1 (SCH
91081040) and approved by the City shall be implemented and
rigorously complied with. Applicant shall deposit and maintain
with the City, a fund in such amounts required by the Director
of Community Development to defray the cost of implementation
and monitoring by City staff and consultants retained by City.
5. A single, detailed landscape and irrigation plan for VTT 32400
and VTT 52203 including slope planting and model home
landscaping, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect
and submitted for City review and approval prior to issuance of
building permits. Fence details, tree staking, soil
preparation, planting details and an automatic irrigation system
and the incorporation of xerotropic landscaping shall be
incorporated wherever feasible. The Applicant shall pay all
processing fees associated with plan review.
6. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in
muted earth tones so as to not impart adverse visual impacts.
Terrace drains shall follow land form slope configuration and
shall not be placed in exposed positions. All down drains shall
be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope
face.
7. Prior to approval of a project landscape plan the applicant
shall demonstrate that the landscaping palette for the project
emphasizes the use of drought tolerant, native plant species
with low water requirements adapted to the inland Southern
California climate. Also, plants used in perimeter or common
area landscaping shall include those which provide nectar, fruit
or seeds as food for native wildlife species. With the proper
3
selection and placement of native plants, the proposed
development would retain some of its natural value. Recommended
plants for landscaping include:
Big -Leaf Maple
Bigberry Manzanita
Coyote Brush
Ceanothus
Redbud
Toyon
Honeysuckle
California sycamore
Holly -leaved Cherry
California Coffeeberry
Holly -leaved Redberry.
Sugarbush
Chaparral Currant
Our Lord's Candle
California -Fuchsia
Acer macrophylla
Arctostaphylos glauca
Baccharis pilularis
Ceanothus spp.
Cercis occidentalis
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Lonicera spp.
Platanus racemose
Prunus ilicifolia
Rhamnus californica
Rhamnus ilicifolia
Rhus ovata
Ribes malvaceum
Yucca whipplei
Zauschneria californica
8. Prior to issuance of building permits, if applicable, Los
Angeles County Fire Department requirements for development in
a wildland fire area shall be incorporated to reduce potential
fire hazards. These provisions include, but may not be limited
to: (1) fire -resistive protection of exterior walls/openings;
(2) fire -retardant roof covering; (3) fire -resistive
construction for decks, balconies and support structures; and
(4) chimney screens installed on each chimney flue.
9. Project design and maintenance activities shall comply with
brush clearance programs administered by the Los Angeles County
Fire Department.
10. Prior to the initiation of construction activities, building
permits or recordation, the project applicant(s) shall submit
and the County Forester and Fire Warden shall approve a fire
hazard reduction/fuel management plan to minimize brush fire
hazards on-site. That plan shall include, but may not be
limited to: (1) use of fire retardant construction materials;
(2) brush clearance and maintenance activities within 100 feet
surrounding individual structures; (3) irrigated planting areas
with provisions for maintenance activities; and (4) the
provision and maintenance of fire breaks.
11. In order to limit the potential threat of wildland fires, low -
fuel volume plants shall be incorporated into the revegetative
plan.
E. APPLICABLE EIR MITIGATION MEASURES
(not addressed in subsections a, b, c or d)
The following conditions are EIR mitigation measures not covered by the
tract conditions listed in subsections a, b, or c which apply to the
project site.
4
1. All grading, earthwork and associated development activities
shall be designed and conducted in accordance with applicable
City and County standards and shall conform with recommendations
contained in the Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation for
Tentative Tract No. 32400, County of Los Angeles (Petra
Geotechnical, Inc., October 181 1988 and the subsequent report
by Petra including the area of Vesting Tentative Tract 52203,
and such other Geotechnical reports as may be prepared for the
site and/or required by the City and County.
2. The project applicant shall be financially responsible for the
following items: (1) the construction or advancement of funds
for the construction of any required on-site drainage
improvements as contained in the Master Plan of Drainage
Facilities approved by the City Engineer and County Engineer of
Los Angeles County; (2) the construction of in -tract and off-
site storm drain system improvements; (3) prorated mitigation
fees of contributed flows and/or (4) any permits or other
assessments customarily imposed by the County Engineer.
3. Drainage shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the
City Engineer. The design and installation of project drainage
facilities shall be in accordance with the flow criteria, design
standards and construction requirements of both the Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works and the City of Diamond Bar.
4. Prior .to the approval of the final tract map, a special
maintenance district or other funding mechanism addressing
Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 and Vesting Tentative Tract 52203
as a single entity, acceptable to and approved by the City shall
be established for the maintenance of on-site storm drainage
facilities. Terrace and down drain will be part of the
Landscape and Lighting District. The main drainage system shall
be accepted into the Los Angeles County or City of Diamond Bar
maintenance District.
5. Prior to the initiation of grading operations, the project
applicant(s) shall obtain all applicable construction,
stormwater and NPDES permits as may be required by the City, the
County of Los Angeles and the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the discharge of urban pollutants.
6. Prior to final map approval, Brea Canyon Road shall be
constructed or bonded for, to the planned four -lane cross-
section south of Glenbrook, adjacent to the tract, to the extent
of the graded area. Plus, left -turn lanes shall be provided at
each of the two project access points along Brea Canyon Road
shall be designed to provide adequate sight distance. Care
shall be taken that the future grades and landscaping adjacent
to these intersections, as well as all internal project
intersections, do not obstruct the necessary line -of -sight.
Applicant shall provide those dedications and improvements, and
be subject to pro -rated reimbursement.
7. With the development of the site plan for residential components
of the project, a traffic signal warrant shall be conducted to
5
determine if a traffic signal is required. If warranted, a
signal shall be installed by developer at both collector road
entrances off Brea Canyon road. Applicant shall pay the prorata
share of the total cost of such signalization.
8. Construction and maintenance activities, including the repair
and maintenance of equipment, shall conform to and comply with
applicable provisions of the City of Diamond Bar's Noise
Ordinance.
9. When feasible, construction equipment shall be stored on-site to
eliminate and/or reduce heavy -equipment truck trips.
10. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential Lot
Nos. 14 through 16, inclusively within Tentative Tract No.
52203, the project applicant(s) shall construct a suitable noise
barrier for those properties effectively attenuating traffic
noise to levels in compliance with City noise standards.
Compliance shall be based upon the City's acceptance of a
subsequent noise study for those properties and implementation
of those measures deemed appropriate by the City Engineer.
11. Project security features which shall be incorporated into the
final design may include: (1) residential dwelling unit
orientation which facilitates "neighborhood involvement"
activities; (2) exterior security lighting; (3) well-designed
access for police patrols to provide optimum observations; and
(4) illuminated street addresses to ensure visibility from the
street for better patrol observation.
12. Prior to final tract map approval, the project applicant(s)
shall submit a sewer study to both the County and City Engineer
identifying project wastewater flow and tributary flow to the
existing County trunk and local sewer lines. This study shall
identify: (1) the location, phasing, bonding and details of any
proposed sewer facilities and improvements by street
configuration, lot layout and gravity flow; (2) any current
capacity shortfalls of the County trunk and/or City sewer lines;
and (3) specific design recommendations to provide additional
lines or sizing upgrade, if required.
13. The project applicant(s) shall convey access and property
easement and rights-of-way to the County Sanitation Districts of
Los Angeles County, as deemed necessary by the County and City
Engineers, for the construction and maintenance of sewer lines
and associated facilities, prior to final map approval.
14. The project applicant(s) shall contribute an equitable share of
cost, as established by the City, to fund improvements to the
area's main lines, pumping stations, etc. required as a result
of project development, prior to final map approval.
15. The project applicant(s) shall provide to the County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County information regarding the
construction and/or building schedule of the project so that the
timing of the County Sanitation Districts' expansion may be
6
coordinated with the project increase in demand.
16. In order to minimize the impact of project development on the
County's solid waste disposal system and to facilitate the
attainment of source reduction standards for the City of Diamond
Bar as contained in the California Integrated Solid Waste
management Act of 1989, the project applicant(s) shall: (1)
consult with the City of Diamond Bar, the County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works regarding implementation of
technologies to reduce and recycle solid waste both during
construction and after completion of the project; and (2)
consult with the current refuse removal collection company(ies)
regarding design standards for access to, location and
construction of trash container enclosures in order to
facilitate implementation of automated refuse collection.
17. The project applicant(s) or subsequent homeowners'
association(s) shall comply with those source reduction and
recycling and composting requirements as may be adopted by the
City of Diamond Bar in accordance with Assembly Bill 939.
18. The project applicant(s) through the Buyer Awareness program,
shall encourage the segregation of green wastes for reuse as
specified under the City's Source Reduction Recycling Element
and County Sanitation Districts waste diversion policies.
19. Applicant shall comply with the mitigation monitoring program to
implement the required EIR No. 92-1 mitigation measures.
20. The applicant shall provide a thematic design for the southerly
entrance to the site off of the access road which is consistent
with the design of the entry statement for the entrance to
Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 from Brea Canyon Road as a
component of the Development Review application. The entry
statement design shall be consistent with the design elements
of The Country Estates.
21. This project shall be subject to and part of the Homeowners
Association created for Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 and made
a party to the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
for this project. A copy of the CC&R's and Articles of
Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map
and placed on file with the Planning Department.
22. Each lot shall be developed in substantial compliance with the
final map and applicable CC&R's.
23. Any lighting fixtures adjacent to interior property lines shall
be approved by the Community Development Director as to type,
orientation and height.
24. All slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer
until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
7
Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for subject to
the approval of City Engineer.
25. All down drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in
muted earth tones so as to not impart adverse visual impacts.
26. All residences will be required to receive approval via the
Development Review process by the Planning Commission subsequent
to approval of the final map.
27. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for subject to
the approval of the City Engineer.
F. ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:
1. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, written
certification from each affected district, that adequate sewer
and water facilities are or will be available and from each
public utility and cable television purveyor that adequate
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed
project, shall be submitted to the City. Such letters must have
been issued by the district, utility and cable television
company, within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval.
2. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be
identified and shown on final map. If an easement is blanket or
indeterminate in nature, a statement to that .effect must be
shown on the final map in lieu of its location.
3. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest
holders, and nature of interest must be submitted when a final
map is submitted for plan check. The account shall remain open
until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An
updated title report/ guarantee and subdivision guarantee must be
submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval.
4. New boundary monuments shall be set in accordance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and as required by the City Engineer.
5. If any required public improvements have not been completed by
Subdivider and accepted by the City prior to the approval of the
final map Subdivider shall enter into a subdivision agreement
with the City and shall post the appropriate security.
6. All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street, sewer and
storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to final map approval.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City review and approval
prior to approval of the final map. Street names shall not
duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar's
postal service zip code areas.
8. House numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
19
City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
9. The detail drawings and construction notes shown on the vesting
tentative map are conceptual only and the approval of this map
does not constitute approval of said notes.
10. Subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer the total grading
and drainage construction cost estimate for bonding purposes
prior to approval of the final map.
11. The final grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit and
approval of final map.
12. Precise grading plans for each lot are to be submitted to the
Community Development Department for approval prior to issuance
of building permits. (This may be on an incremental or
composite basis.)
13. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
current Uniform Building Code, City Grading Ordinance 14 and
City's Hillside Management Ordinance, as modified by CUP91-5 and
acceptable grading practices. The precise and final grading
plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved
Vesting Tentative Map.
14. All landslide debris shall be completely removed prior to fill
placement as required by the final geotechnical report.
15. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan
check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted in
compliance with City guidelines to the City Engineer for
approval and said report shall be prepared by a registered
geotechnical engineer and geologist licensed by the State of
California. The report shall address, but not be limited to,
the following:
(a) Soil remediation measures shall be designed for a "worst
case" geologic interpretation subject to verification in
the field during grading.
(b) The extent of any remedial grading into natural areas
shall be clearly defined on the grading plans.
(c) Areas of potential for debris flow shall be defined and
proper remedial measures implemented as approved by the
City Engineer.
(d) Gross stability of all fill slopes shall be analyzed as
part of the geotechnical report including remedial fill
that replaces natural slope.
(e) Stability of all proposed slopes shall be confirmed by
analysis as approved by the City Engineer.
(f) All geologic data including landslides and exploratory
excavations must be shown on a consolidated geotechnical
map using the 40 -scale final grading plan as a base.
All geotechnical and soils related findings and recommendations must
be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of
4
any grading permits and recordation of the final map.
16. Final grading plans shall be prepared in a 24" x 36" format and
designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final
detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial
earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated
into the plans.
17. Grading plan(s) must be signed and stamped by a California
registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and
registered Geologist.
18. All identified geologic hazards within the vesting tentative
tract boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the
City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as "Restricted
Use Area" subject to geologic hazard. The owner shall dedicate
to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or
other structures within such restricted use areas shown on the
final map.
19. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing
completion of all drainage facilities necessary for dewatering
all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to
final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading
permit(s).
20. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over adjacent
parcels shall be delineated and shown on the final map as
approved by the City Engineer.
21. All drainage improvements necessary for dewatering and
protecting the subdivided properties shall be installed prior to
issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel
that may be subject to drainage flows enter, leaving, or within
a parcel for which a building permit is requested.
22. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits.
23. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any
U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 permit shall be obtained
from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the
California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and
submitted to the City Engineer.
24. The Subdivider shall provide drainage facilities to remove the
flood hazard and dedicate and show necessary easements and/or
rights of way on the final map to the satisfaction of City
Engineer. Storm drainage facilities should be constructed
within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to
the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County Flood Control
District.
25. All identified flood hazard locations within the tentative map
boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the City
Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as
10
"Restricted Use Area" subject to flood hazard. The Owner shall
dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of
buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas
shown on the final map.
26. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for
work within its right-of-way or connection to its facilities.
A permit from CALTRANS is required for work within its right-of-
way or connection to its facilities.
27. A final drainage study and final storm drain improvement plans
in a 2411x36" sheet format shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works prior to final map approval. All drainage
facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with County of Los Angeles Standards for
acceptance and disposal of all related drainage.
28. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient
street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall be completed
beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper
outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot
lines shown on the final map.
29. Subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost
estimate for bonding purposes of all public improvements, prior
to approval of the final map.
30. New street centerline movements shall be. set at the
intersections of streets, intersection of streets with tract
boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the
points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes
showing the ties between all movements set and four (4) durable
reference points for each shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for approval in accordance with City Standards, prior
to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
31. Street improvement plans in a 2411x36" sheet format, prepared by
a California registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and
an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval.
32. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from
the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits
required.
33. No street shall exceed a maximum slope of 12% unless approved by
the City Engineer.
34. Construct base and pavement on all streets in accordance with
soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer
and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by
the City Engineer.
11
35. Vehicular access must be provided to all "Urban Pollutant
Basins" with a minimum width of 15 feet, with 12 feet of
pavement and with a maximum slope no greater than 15% unless
otherwise approved the City Engineer.
36. Subdivider shall pay its fair share amount for signal
improvements at Pathfinder and Brea Canyon Road prior to final
map approval based upon amended traffic study as approved by the
City Engineer.
37. Subdivider shall pay its fair share of other signal improvements
required pursuant to the approved EIR prior to approval of the
final map based upon amended traffic study as approved by City
Engineer.
38. Label any private drives or fire lanes and delineate on the
final map to the satisfaction of the City. Owner shall offer to
dedicate on the final map the public street from Brea Canyon
Road to the westerly vesting tentative tract boundary.
Subdivider shall improve street to its full width in accordance
with City standards, including, but not limited to, sidewalks on
one side, curbs, gutters, and street lights.
39. Construct or post bonds for drainage improvements and offer
easements needed for street and slope drainage as required by
the City Engineer prior to recordation of the final map.
40. Construct sidewalks throughout and adjoining the frontage of the
vesting tentative tract per City standards and as approved by
the City Engineer.
41. Provide and install street name signs to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
42. All utility lines shall be underground within the Vesting
Tentative Tract Map.
43. Dedicate slope easements along Brea Canyon Road in favor of the
City as required by the City Engineer, prior to approval or
recordation of the final map. The dedicated slope easements
shall be placed in a Homeowner's Association as directed by the
City Engineer.
44. Construct curb and gutters per City standards subject to
approval by the City Engineer.
45. Construct wheelchair ramps at all corners and all intersections
pursuant to City Standards or as may be required by the City
Engineer.
46. Construct street lights along all streets as required to per
City standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street
lights shall be annexed into the County lighting districts, or
shall be operated and maintained by a homeowners association.
47. Traffic improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered
12
Traffic. Engineer in a 2411x36" sheet format and submitted to and
approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an
agreement executed guaranteeing completion of traffic
improvements prior to final map approval.
48. Intersection line of sight designs shall be submitted to the
City for approval as may be required by the City Engineer.
49. Traffic control signing and striping plans shall be prepared in
accordance with City requirements and submitted to and approved
by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map.
50. Secondary street access must be provided as approved by the City
Engineer.
51. Prior to final map approval the subdivider shall submit a
sanitary sewer area study to the City Engineer to verify that
capacity is available in the sewerage system to be used as the
outfall for the sewers in this land division. If the system is
found to be of insufficient capacity, the problem must be
resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
52. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral
which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer
system serving the tract shall be connected to the City or
District sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade
and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation
District and Los Angeles County Public Works Department, prior
to approval of the final map.
53. The Owner shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and
County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building
permits. The area within the tentative map boundaries shall be
annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
and appropriate easements for all sewer main and trunk lines
shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on
the final map.
54. The Subdivider, at Subdivider's sole cost and expense, shall
construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los
Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation
District Standards.
55. Prior to final map approval a water system with appurtenant
facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division
designed to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications,
must be provided and approved by the City Engineer. The system
shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as
determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water
mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire
flows to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire
Department.
56. Prior to final map approval, the Subdivider shall construct, or
enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing
construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water
13
system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD)
specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows
as may be required by the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire
Department.
57. Provide separate underground utility services to each parcel,
including water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV, in
accordance with the respective utility company standards.
Easements required by the utility companies shall be approved
by the City Engineer prior to granting.
58. Subdivider shall relocate and underground any existing on-site
utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the
respective utility owner.
59. Prior to submittal of the final map, written certifications from
Walnut Valley Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Jones Intercable
stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to
serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the City.
60. Based on a determination by the City Engineer, the City reserves
the right to require the applicant to plan and incorporate into
the homeowners' association obligations the future installation
of main and service lines capable of delivery of reclaimed
water to all homeowners' association maintained common area
landscaped portions of the Tract, prior to final map approval.
The system shall be designed to permit "switch over" of non-
domestic services on each area within the homeowners'
association maintained landscaped common area at time of
availability of reclaimed water, all to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and designed to the specifications of the Walnut
Valley Water District.
61. The applicant has agreed to work with staff to incorporate the
placement of trees along the south side of the access road to
the South Pointe Middle School.
62. The applicant shall incorporate a meandering sidewalk, minimum
16 foot wide landscape setback, block wall undulation and
landscaping theme as depicted on Exhibit "C" dated September 18,
1996 along the southerly boundary of the tract.
14
yy'S[.' 1 il�iy
UVIOND HIM 1. REVISED
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 396-5676
TO: Property Owners within a 500 foot radius of subject site
FROM: Community Development Dept., City of Diamond Bar
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to State Law, that a public hearing will be held by the City Council to determine whether
or not the subject request(s) shall be approved under the provisions of State Law and the City of Diamond Bar Zoning Code as
follows:
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Tuesday, November 5, 1996 7:00 p.m.
PLACE OF HEARING: SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203
REQUEST: A request to subdivide a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single family residential development
and 6 lettered lots for streets and landscaping. This proposal is a further subdivision of Vesting Tentative Map 32400, Lots
92 & 93, which is a 93 lot subdivision with 91 residential lots and 2 remainder lots, located on the west side of Brea Canyon
Road, north of Pathfinder Road.
APPLICANT: Diamond Crest Estates, LLC, 27285 Las Rambles, Suite 230, Mission Viejo, CA 92691
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: On June 3, 1994, the City Council Certified the Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the South Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040) which includes the subject property. Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Sec. 15164, it has been determined that potential environmental impacts associated
with the proposed project will not require major revisions to the EIR in that no significant changes in circumstances under which the
project is undertaken have occurred and no new information or issues of substantial importance not previously addressed in the Final
EIR have been identified through the subsequent environmental review and therefore an addendum to the Final EIR has been prepared.
Published in:
San Gabriel Valley Tribune: October 22, 1996
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin: October 22, 1996
If you are unable to attend the public hearing, but wish to send written
comments, please write to the City of Diamond Bar Community Development
Department at the address given below. To preview case materials or for
further information on this subject please contact the Community
Development Department at (909) 396-5676. POMON
If you challenge this application and project in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
CASE MATERIALS are available for review between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 3 p.m., at the Community Development Dept., 21660 Copley Dr., Ste.
190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
AREA MAP:
T
North Subject Site
(not to x Ic)
PA-HP:NDrR RD
� � •p r 5 C
LOT s LOT 5 ; LOT b i LOT T LOT a ; LOT 9 a
96 SEP 20 'P Z :09 ' 9'
alAAAM
! a■
`i \ i
earoeJ•I+s. rae�e ACCE55 ROAD `—w«ITe ALneRe
OAa TR4,
+iI 40010 t% V ViN+►i (i_ _ice_ I,* w0c, fi �. +�w5 J.
2-1 DOWN 5LOPe .—.
�r
PARKWAY PLANVIEW
i SI
i
LOT 10 LOT 1 / LOT 12 LOT 15
W�
J�
e -v
pec o a>a_o�e
�Sg
2 1 UP 9LOP� Q
wf �'
PER5PECTWE SKETCH
rir.
r
SECTION A -A
xALt a ,e-•,-o
elueeANe ao.+aev
r- o.c Ta[ee
raoEEciwrul
OEiIiN
ABBOC.AlE6
L
t0
� G
0
C 0
fl.
�z
Q 0 V n
E m <
Q
II
I �
s
1
I 10111 • N
CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN
wc•Noe1Nw e•x�.tr V
C-1 11
� � I
Rnne
:.1 uP alo.e
cls ?, ��(U
i
"I (7C rlADDENDUM TO THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
'96 JUN 25 f 3 :46
SOUTH POINTE MASTER PLAN
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 92081040
LEAD AGENCY:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING DEPARTMENT
21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE, SUITE 160
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765-4177
1
APPLICANT:
DIAMOND CREST ESTATES, LLC
16950 ASTON STREET
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714
JULY 1996
ADDENDUM
TO THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
SOUTH POINTE MASTER PLAN
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 92081040
Lead Agency:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING DEPARTMENT
21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE, SUITE 190
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765-4177
(909) 861-3117 FAX
(909) 396-5676
Applicant:
DIAMOND CREST ESTATES, LLC
16950 ASTON STREET
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714
(714) 221-0517 FAX
(714) 221-0510
JULY 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF SECTIONS
Section
EM
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1-1
1.1 Statement of Objectives .................................. 1-1
1.2 Statutory Authority ..................................... 1-3
1.3 Intended Use .......................................... 1-3
1.4 Incorporated by Reference ................................ 1-4
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................... 2-1
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................... 3-1
3.1 Project Location ........................................ 3-1
3.2 Project Description ...................................... 3-1
3.2.1 Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 ......... 3-5
3.2.2 Design Revisions to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 ... 3-7
3.2.3 Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 52203 ............................... 3-9
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS .............................
4-1
4.1
Introduction ...........................................
4-1
4.2
Land Use ............................................
4-2
4.2.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .............................
4-7
4.2.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 .......................
4-8
4.2.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-10
4.3
Earth
..............................................
4-11
4.3.1
Approval of VTT 52203 ............................
4-12
4.3.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ......................
4-13
4.3.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-14
4.4
Hydrology/Water
Quality .................................
4-14
4.4.1
Approval of VTT 52203 ............................
4-16
4.4.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ......................
4-17
4.4.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-17
4.5
Biological
Resources ....................................
4-17
4.5.1
Approval of VTT 52203 ............................
4-20
4.5.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ......................
4-21
4.5.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-21
4.6
Transportation/Circulation................................
4-22
4.6.1
Approval of VTT 52203 ............................
4-25
4.6.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ......................
4-26
4.6.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-28
4.7
Air Quality ..........................................
4-29
4.7.1
Approval of VTT 52203 ............................
4-30
4.7.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ......................
4-32
4.7.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 .......
4-32
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
LIST OF SECTIONS (Continued)
0
4.8 Noise ............................................ 4-32
5.0 DETERMINATION ........................................... 5-1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1 Vicinity Map .............................................. 3-2
2 Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 ................... 3-3
3 Approved Access Road ....................................... 3-4
4 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 ........................... 3-6
5 Amended Land Use Plan Overlay ................................ 3-8
South Pointe Master Plan ii
Addendum to the Final EIR
4.8.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .........................
4-34
4.8.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 .......4-35
4.8.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 ....
4-36
4.9
Public Services and Facilities ............................
4-36
4.9.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .........................
4-42
4.9.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ...................
4-45
4.9.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 ....
4-45
4.10
Archeology/Paleontology
...............................
4-45
4.10.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .........................
4-46
4.10.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ...................
4-46
4.10.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 ....
4-47
4.11
Aesthetics .........................................
4-47
4.11.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .........................
4-48
4.11.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ...................
4-48
4.1 1.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 ....
4-49
4.12
Growth
Inducement ................... I ..............
4-49
4.12.1
Approval of VTT 52203 .........................
4-50
4.12.2
Design Revisions to VTT 32400 ...................
4-50
4.12.3
Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400 ....
4-50
5.0 DETERMINATION ........................................... 5-1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1 Vicinity Map .............................................. 3-2
2 Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 ................... 3-3
3 Approved Access Road ....................................... 3-4
4 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 ........................... 3-6
5 Amended Land Use Plan Overlay ................................ 3-8
South Pointe Master Plan ii
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Statement of Objectives
On June 3, 1994, the City Council (Council) of the City of Diamond Bar (City) certified the
Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan, SCH No. 92081040 (Final
EIR).' On October 18, 1994, following its consideration of the information presented therein
and following a number of additional public hearing, the Council conditionally approved Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 (VTT 32400).2 As part of that action, the Council adopted
Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Consideration (Findings), and a Mitigation
Reporting and Monitoring Program (MRMP) for VTT 32400. In conditionally approving VTT
32400, the Council also approved a Development Agreement (Agreement), Hillside
Management Ordinance Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Oak Tree Removal Permit (Oak Tree
Permit) for that project.
By certifying the Final EIR and adopting both Findings and the MRMP, the City fulfilled those
environmental disclosure obligations contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, as
amended (CEQA), codified in the California Public Resources Code (PRC), and the Guidelines
for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Guidelines), included in
Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).
The Final EIR contained a comprehensive analysis of the potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative environmental effects associated with the development of that 171 ± acre site
identified as the South Pointe Master Plan Project. In addition to VTT 32400, a number of
separate projects were included in and addressed as part of the Final EIR, including Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 51407 (VTT 51407) and Tentative Tract Map No. 51253 (TT
51253). Notwithstanding the inclusion of those projects therein, the City's conditional
approval on October 18, 1994 related only to VTT 32400.3 In conditionally approving that
subdivision application, the City authorized the subdivision of that 48± acre site to create
ninety-one (91) single-family residential lots and two (2) residual residentially -zoned parcels
' The Final EIR consists of the following documents: (1) Annotated Draft Environmental Impact
Report for the South Pointe Master Plan (November 1992, annotated May 1994); (2) Response to
Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan (February 18,
1993); (3) Technical Appendix - Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for
the South Pointe Master Plan (May 18, 1993); (4) Volume 11 - Response to Comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan (November 1993); (5) Volume 0l -
Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan
(May 1994); (6) City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission resolutions, staff reports, minutes, and
public testimony; and (7) City of Diamond Bar Council resolutions, staff reports, minutes, and public
testimony,
2 City of Diamond Bar City Council Resolution Nos. 94-48 and 94-49.
3 Tentative Tract Map No 51253 was subsequently conditionally approved by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar on May 14, 1995. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51407 was denied by
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar in December 1994 (Resolution No. 94-55).
South Pointe Master Plan 1-1
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
(i.e., identified as Lots 92 and 93 in VTT 32400) totaling approximately 6.3± acres." In
accordance with the City's land use policies, one single-family residence could be constructed
upon each of the two residential lots without subsequent discretionary actions by the City.5
As a result, the total development authorized by the City upon approval of VTT 32400 was
93 dwelling units.
In June 1996, the Applicant (i.e., Diamond Crest Estates, LLC) submitted an application for
Vested Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 (VTT 52203) to the City for the 6.3 ± acre portion of
VTT 32400 which comprises the two residual residential zoned lots. As proposed, the two
residual residential properties would be subdivided to create sixteen (16) single-family dwelling
units, thereby producing a net increase of fourteen (14) units upon that subdivision map area.
As part of that pending application, the Applicant further identified a number of minor technical
amendments to VTT 32400, including both minor design revisions and changes to those
conditions of approval (Conditions) adopted by the City under Resolution Nos. 94-48 and 94-
49. Both VTT 52203 and the proposed changes to VTT 32400 are more thoroughly described
in Section 3.0 (Project Description) herein. The potential environmental impacts associated
with the implementation of VTT 52203 and the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 are
examined in Section 4.0 (Environmental Impact Analysis) of this document.
The City, acting in its capacity as Lead Agency, has undertaken this environmental analysis
for the purpose of assessing the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
amendments to VTT 32400, including the implementation of VTT 52203, the design changes
to VTT 32400 as required to accommodate VTT 52203, and the proposed revisions to the
adopted Conditions. Based upon the presence of a previous environmental analysis
encompassing the project site, this document has been further prepared for the purpose of
identifying those minor technical changes to the Final EIR which may be required to accurately
describe the potential environmental effects of the project.
This addendum to the Final EIR (Addendum), as authorized under Section 15164 of the CCR,
has been prepared to: (1) provide an environmental basis for the City's consideration of the
project; (2) identify those physical changes' which may occur to the project area which are
attributable to the proposed action; (3) provide an analysis of those potential environmental
impacts associated with those physical changes which have been proposed or which may
" The two residual residential lots were initially proposed for commercial use and comprised a
portion of a larger 31 -acre area which included both the two residual lots and other adjoining areas
within the then proposed VTT 51407 which was part of the South Pointe Master Plan Project as
addressed in the Final EIR. The analysis presented therein assumed the commercial development of
the 6.3± acre residual residential parcels.
5 This statement is not intended to infer that the City either established a minimum lot size
requirement distinct from that contained under the City's general plan and zoning code or precluded
the property owner from pursuing the subsequent subdivision of the 6.3± acre site in accordance with
those policies and procedures.
' In accordance with Section 15358(b) of the CCR, effects analyzed under CEQA must be related
to a physical change in the environment.
South Pointe Master Plan f-2
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
result from the development of the project; and (4) set forth the technical changes to the Final
EIR as required to fully assess the project's potential environmental effects.
1.2 Statutory Authority
Section 15164 of the CCR authorizes a Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency to prepare an
addendum to a previously certified environmental impact report (EIR) when: (1) none of the
conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have
occurred 7; (2) only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR under
consideration adequate under CEQA; and (3) the changes to the EIR made by the addendum
do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment.
Based upon this analysis, the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project will not require important revisions to the Final EIR in that no new significant
environmental impacts not previously considered have been identified herein, no substantial
changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken have
occurred, and no new information or issues of substantial importance not previously addressed
in the Final EIR have been identified through this subsequent environmental review.
The Final EIR, together with the information included herein, adequately analyze the potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed project and provide an adequate
environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions which may be taken by the Lead
Agency and other Responsible Agencies thereupon.
1.3 Intended Use
The following governmental agencies are anticipated to utilize this Addendum, in conjunction
with the Final EIR, as the environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions upon the
project:
7 Section 15162 of the CCR requires that further environmental analysis, beyond that contained
in a previously certified EIR, is required when: (1) subsequent changes are proposed in the project
which will require important revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in a previous EIR on the project; (2) substantial changes occur
with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, such as a substantial
deterioration in the air quality where the project will be located, which will require important revisions
in the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered in the
previous EIR; or (3) new information of substantial importance to the project becomes available and
the information was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete and the new information shows any of the following: (a) the project will have one
or more significant effects not previously discussed in the EIR; (b) significant effects previously
examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would be feasible and would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects of the project; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which were not
previously considered in the EIR would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the
environment. Should any of these conditions exist, the Lead Agency is required to prepare either a
subsequent EIR (Section 15162(b), CCR) or a supplement to the previous EIR (Section 15163, CCR).
South Pointe Master Plan f"3
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
City of Diamond Bar. Section 15025(c) of the CCR indicates that where an advisory body,
such as the City's Planning Commission, is required to make a recommendation to the
decision-making body on a pending project subject to CEQA, the advisory body shall review
and consider the environmental documentation in either draft or final form. Section
15169(c) of the CCR further requires that prior to taking action the decision-making body
of the Lead Agency consider the Addendum with the previously certified Final EIR.
Responsible Agencies. As required under Sections 15050(b) and 15096(f) of the CCR,
prior to reaching a decision on a pending project, Responsible Agencies having jurisdiction
thereupon must consider the environmental effects of the project as shown in the
environmental impact report. Those Responsible Agencies, identified during the preparation
of the Final EIR or subsequently identified during the preparation of this Addendum, may
subsequently utilize the information contained in the Final EIR, as augmented by this
Addendum, as evidence of those agencies' CEQA compliance.
1.4 Incorporated by Reference
Section 15150 of the CCR allows EIRs to incorporate by reference all or portions of other
documents that are a matter of public record. Where all or a portion of another document is
incorporated by reference, the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full
as part of the text of the environmental impact report.
The information presented in this Addendum is based, in part, upon other environmental
documents and technical studies addressing those environmental issues which may be affected
by the proposed project. Pursuant to the above referenced regulatory authority, the following
document is hereby incorporated by reference:
• Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, SCH No.
91041083 and Addendum (City of Diamond Bar, July 25, 1995).
The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Diamond Bar General Plan and
Addendum presents a program -level analysis of the potential secondary and cumulative
impacts resulting from the implementation of those land use and related policies contained
in the City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan (City of Diamond Bar, July 25, 1995). As
indicated in the Land Use Map therein, both the area comprising VTT 32400 and VTT
52203 is designed "RL Low Density Residential (max. 3 du/acre)." Under that designation,
the 48 ± acre site, inclusive of those tentative maps, could be developed to a maximum
density of 144 dwelling units. Since the combined number of units associated with both
VTT 32400 (i.e., 93 units) and VTT 52203 (i.e., net increase of 14 units) is less that total
assumed in the City of Diamond Bar General Plan and analyzed in the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the City of Diamond Bar General Plan and Addendum, the environmental
analysis contained in that first-tier environmental document adequately addresses the
potential secondary and cumulative effects of the proposed project.
This document is available for review at the office of the City of Diamond Bar Planning
Department (21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177) during
the regular business hours of the City.
South Pointe Master Plan 1-4
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
SECTION 2.0
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Fina/ Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan, SCH No. 52081040
was certified by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar on June 3, 1994, in that body's
capacity as the decision-making body of the Lead Agency. The Final EIR, prepared in
accordance with CEQA and Guidelines, analyzed the direct, indirect and cumulative
environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the then proposed South Pointe
Master Plan Project, including each of the elements and activities described therein. The Final
EIR identifies a number of significant or potentially significant effects on the environment
which may occur as a result of the implementation of the South Pointe Master Plan Project.
Although the City certified the Final EIR,' pursuant to Section 15090 of the CCR, and
subsequently prepared and posted a Notice of Determination (NOD) of that action as required
under Section 15094 therein, the City did not approve, conditionally approve or deny the
South Pointe Master Plan Project, inclusive of VTT 32400 and VTT 51407 and TT 51253, or
any of the alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
On October 18, 1994, following the City's consideration of the information presented in the
Final EIR, the City elected to implement a variation of Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon
Preservation,2 as more thoroughly described in both Volume /ll - Response to Comments on
the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan and in the adopted
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations,' in lieu of the then proposed
South Pointe Master Plan Project. As described in the Final EIR, that alternative project
included the approval of VTT 32400 as well as any and all related discretionary actions,
approvals, and entitlements requisite to the construction and occupancy of that subdivision
map within the jurisdiction of the City. Following that action, a second NOD was posted and
disseminated by the City pursuant to CEQA and Guidelines.
' The Final EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects associated with the development of
that larger 171 ± acre site identified as the South Pointe Master Plan. Included as part of that
environmental analysis was the development of then proposed VTT 32400 which included 91 single-
family residential lots and two separate commercial parcels. In adopting a 91 -unit variation of
Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon Preservation, as described in the Final EIR, and subsequently
approving VTT 32400, the City eliminated the then proposed commercial use from that subdivision map
area and redesignated that portion of the project site for residential development.
As indicated in the Final EIR, the commercial area upon VTT 32400 was assumed to total
approximately 5.9± acres. Not included therein was the 0.34 acre area identified as Lot "A" (as
indicated in VTT 32400) which was identified as a common area lot. Based upon the inclusion of that
additional acreage, the residual lots (as described in the Final EIR) directly correlate with the 6.3± acre
area now under consideration as part of VTT 52203.
2 As described in Volume /// - Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report
for the South Pointe Master Plan, which is part of the Final EIR, Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon
Preservation assumed the development of 75 dwelling units upon the area of VTT 32400. No
commercial development was assumed thereupon. Alternative No. 2, as adopted by the City as the
"preferred project," included both a 91 -unit subdivision and two residual residential parcels.
3 City of Diamond Bar, City Council Resolution Nos. 94-48 and 94-49, dated October 18, 1995.
South Pointe Master Plan 2-1
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
In December 1995, under City Council Resolution No. 94-55, the City Council formally denied
VTT 51407. On May 14, 1995, following further consideration of TT 51253, the City
conditionally approved that tentative map and authorized the construction of 21 residential
dwelling units upon the 7 t site defined by the boundaries of that tract map.
Independent of the City's actions, the Walnut Valley Unified School District (District) acquired
from the then property owner (i.e., RNP Development Inc.) the area identified as VTT 51407.
In acquiring that site, the District ceased the subsequent processing of that tentative map
through the City. Following its acquisition, the District prepared and implemented a grading
plan which resulted in the relocation of that surplus soil stockpile (as described in the Final EIR)
from the South Pointe Middle School site to an alternative stockpile location southerly of that
facility's boundaries (within the area of the previously proposed VTT 51407). Upon
completion of those activities, the District commenced construction of a permanent facility
upon the South Pointe Middle School site.
In May 1995, in an event unrelated to those grading operations conducted by the District, a
landslide occurred in the westerly area of VTT 51407 affecting both that tract map area and
portions of TT 51253. Remedial grading activities were undertaken by the District to stability
the affected slope area. Based upon both the District's relocation of the stockpile and its
subsequent actions to remediate the area of slope failure, the physiological characteristics of
a significant proportion of that area previously described as VTT 51407 have been
subsequently modified, including the removal of a majority of vegetation thereupon.
Based upon ongoing coordination between the Applicant and the District, both parties have
entered into an agreement whereby the Applicant will be able to utilize the District's relocated
soil stockpile as partial fulfillment of the fill material required by the Applicant to create the
building pads and street network associated with VTT 32400.
Since certification of the Final EIR, a number of the related projects identified in the Final EIR
and used for the assessment of cumulative environmental impacts therein have been modified
through the approval, construction and/or other modification to those projects. In addition,
other reasonably foreseeable future projects have been proposed subsequent to the
certification of that EIR. Those changes to the inventory of probable future projects will not
alter the cumulative impact assessment presented in the Final EIR. No new projects are known
to the City which, in combination with the pending project, will produce additional cumulative
environmental impacts not previously disclosed in the Final EIR.
South Pointe Master Plan 2-2
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SECTION 3.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Project Location
The proposed project is located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Diamond Bar
and comprises a portion of that area identified in the Final EIR as the South Pointe Master Plan
Project site. The site's location is illustrated in Exhibit 1 (Vicinity Map).
The project site is more specifically defined as that area located within and adjoining the
boundaries of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400, as conditionally approved by the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar on October 18, 1994. The project site is bordered on the
east by Brea Canyon Road, on the west by the Walnut Valley Unified School District's South
Pointe Middle School, on the north by an established single-family residential area, and on the
south by a vacant property presently owned by the District and previously described as
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51407.
The approved VTT 32400 is illustrated in Exhibit 2 (Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
32400). Although not included as part of that same exhibit, the City concurrently approved
a secondary access road designed to provide additional vehicular access to the subdivision
map area and connecting Brea Canyon Road to the South Pointe Middle School. That
secondary access road is illustrated in Exhibit 3 (Approved Access Road).
3.2 Project Description
A number of events have occurred which potentially affect the subsequent development of the
South Pointe Master Plan Project site (see Section 2.0, Setting). For example, the purpose of
the area of VTT 51407 by the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the District's election
to cease the subsequent processing of that tentative map has resulted in a reduction in the
overall development previously proposed or currently pending within the geographic area
examined as part of the Final EIR. Following that action, rather than revising the Final EIR to
eliminate the cumulative analysis of VTT 51407, the City retained the environmental analysis
for that tract as part of that certified environmental document to facilitate any future
development proposal(s) which may be submitted by the District or others thereupon.'
In conditionally approving VTT 32400, the City authorized the construction of 91 single-family
dwelling units and two residual residentially -zoned parcels totaling 6.3 ± acres upon that 48 ±
acre project site. In accordance with City policies, a total of two single-family dwelling units
could be constructed upon the residual parcels without subsequent discretionary actions by
the City. The Applicant now proposes to develop 16 single-family residential units upon the
6.3± acre residual parcels. As proposed under VTT 52203, a net increase in fourteen
dwelling units would be authorized thereupon.
' With the purchase of that map area previously defined as VTT 51407 by the District and the
District's cessation of the further processing of that tentative tract, the 24.7± acre commercial site
and the adjoining residential units proposed as part of that tract were eliminated from the South Pointe
Master Plan Project.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-1
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
}583 /
•� 9 ♦ 1 1 GRANT1�
II DDY I "" •------ '/C'
••• Y'�' - \ �' I
Cit t( a �\
r
Hall " P PG / '!
2'
\ I r , t
:''� `C� • - I III r /Ov /��� I t��l�/I 1 ) � .i /hl� /
Vol
SSSS`
� �M�.SJ�i�..,�i•�alnut•�f •-4r;�'CI`
01
Walnu Siding
(-- -- / u
Covina I^ _
F 1� 528, LYCOMING 559 _ 1�e s4rJustry
----- _ f
Industry PO) /,/ ............ _ ;n.r
SIN 1i
FIG
LANE'' �- �_ �• 571 ` s
PROJECT SITE BM
�, a z —
• �I J L II ,\ ..p!! , '� 1089Ide
10
iamond
• , c"I" � �I j''•..% f/
13
4($ }
Base Map: USGS Quadrangle Maps, San Dimas and Yorba Linda, CA EXHIBIT 1
Photo Revised in 1981 VICINITY MAP
South Pointe Master Plan 3-2
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
0
VESTING TENTATIVE NAP NO. j2400
CITY OF D I A,'C\D 3A
Q NOTES
5,
01
V,4
VI(IN11Y MAP
� N.7
n err s nr_
I 1 (.1 NO I dhdd I',
If, /1'1
j 'I Ak-
e)
E.
J
:,CAI I. I'• h0' MIN 1 (11 W IW
C-f-AdMIRCIAL
," - 'i I.- f :: -.. :� 1) 1111',, 1)3 GIM!,�, AW A: 4/.44 AC
jqq?
LL I ILRI-D LOISI 8 DAIL: JUNL.
-..:\.� } \ I r +r �`. tfutf miwvs�
PREPARI D BY: OUNI, R/Uf VI I (]1'[ It:
CI 111111:11 1 NG I N1 1111 NC A111, I 1 110 AND SON'S
A I
EXHIBIT 2
APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32400
South Pointe Master Plan 3-3
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
�a
NOT TO SCALE
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
s '�1CJ
t� I
M
AIM
r ■ r M r ■ p r N
Flat F/rt P-41 P.M.1pma P.M "61/ -wt /-Ir1
--- a --_a---------------------.
J
f
a,
r Q
cc
.-w• Fw r -rat �w� Fw.t /.qt � ��V�rr
-----------------------
74;,,
M
EXHIBIT 3
APPROVED ACCESS ROAD
3-4
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The area within VTT 32400 is presently designated "RL Low Density Residential (max. 3
du/acre)" on the Land Use Map included in the City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan. As further
indicated in the City's Zoning Map, the site is designated "R-1 15,000." Pursuant to Section
22.20.070 et seq. of the Los Angeles County Planning and Zoning Code, adopted as the City's
Zoning Ordinance, residential land uses with an average lot size of 15,000 square feet are
authorized thereupon.
Based upon the site's general plan and zoning designations and based upon the lot averaging
provisions contained therein, no formal redesignation of the site's current zoning standards is
required to accommodate the proposed residential use upon the 6.3± acre area defined as
VTT 52203.
Concurrent with this subdivision application, the Applicant seeks minor technical changes to
VTT 32400, including both design revisions and modification of the approved set of Conditions
as adopted by the City. Each of these project components are individually described below.
3.2.1 Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203
Proposed is the subdivision of that 6.3 ± acre site which was initially proposed for commercial
use and subsequently conditionally approved by the City (as part of VTT 32400) for residential
development. The proposed 22 -lot tentative map, illustrated in Exhibit 4 (Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 52203) herein, includes 16 residential lots, three (3) numbered streets
(identified as Lots "A," "B," and "C"), and three (3) common -area lots.
Ingress to and egress from the tract map area is by means of those local streets contained in
VTT 32400. As approved in that vesting tentative map, access from Brea Canyon Road is
provided by means of two access points. Access to VTT 32400 is provided from both an
approved roadway located in the northwestern portion of that approved map and a second
roadway located southerly of the tract map boundaries. As approved by the City on October
18, 1994, an access road connecting Brea Canyon Road and the South Pointe Middle School
will be constructed as part of VTT 32400. The approved alignment of that access road, as
illustrated in Exhibit 3 (Approved Access Road) herein, generally parallels the southerly
boundary of VTT 32400. That same southerly boundary also serves as the southerly edge of
VTT 52203.
From Brea Canyon Road, the southerly access road commences at a location south of the
approved subdivision and intersects with Brea Canyon Road at a location within that area
previously identified as VTT 51407 and now under the ownership of the Walnut Valley Unified
School District. From that point, the access road curves northwesterly such that the resulting
right-of-way includes portions of both VTT 32400 (now VTT 52203) and the District's current
holdings located southerly of that tract map area. At the westerly edge of VTT 32400 (now
VTT 52203), the roadway again curves northwesterly and terminates at the South Pointe
Middle School campus site.
2 Identified as Lot "A" and Lots 92 and 93 in VTT 32400.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-5
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
P. 16o o
P-79
/ / - "OTES
1-12
4
It
-'t-V
ShLEGDD sTet" sL*Immv
T;-
c
VICMTY MAP
4
T
z
LUT SUMMARY
is la rxl
IMAs Iq AI 91
3A"
7,11 'Ap
9 TAIF-TAlf
is -4",3 AM
--Tv-_ 731--y.3yi
-�i HI
t ' 'yfi
I
'm I)Aa
ACRF SUAY.NRY
4— b—A' oRre
LEGAL DESORPTION
0 S
PROPERTY O*FNER! PROPER"
OWNER
c -
ea 159Y
DEVELOPEW
Pnro
PREPARED BY -
EXHIBIT 4
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 52203
South Pointe Master Plan 3-6
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Approximately midway between Brea Canyon Road and the South Pointe Middle School, the
southerly access road connects to Street "C" (as designated in VTT 32400 )3 which extends
northward into VTT 32400. Motorists traveling along Street "C" would then travel either
eastward or westward along other interior streets within VTT 324004 and then southward to
enter upon those local streets serving the residential lots comprising VTT 52203. Street "C,"
which will be reconfigured from that approved as part of VTT 32400, will accommodate a
vehicle turn -around with informational kiosk, landscaped median, and restricted access
gateway.
As proposed, VTT 52203 will be developed upon the area of the two residual residential sites
which were previously approved by the City of Diamond Bar as part of that agency's
conditional approval of VTT 32400. Although VTT 52203 is proposed within the geographic
area of VTT 32400, the approval of that project constitutes a subsequent action by the City
which is independent of its previous approval of VTT 32400 but which relates to its
subsequent consideration of those proposed changes to VTT 32400 as identified by the
Applicant and as described herein.
Those Conditions which have been previously approved by the City impose upon VTT 32400
underlying conditions which (unless otherwise amended by the City) apply to both that project
and any subsequent discretionary actions which include that geographic area. Since the
underlying map (i.e., VTT 32400) imposes Conditions subsequently affecting VTT 52203, each
of the Conditions adopted by the City for VTT 32400 also apply to VTT 52203.
3.2.2 Design Revisions to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400
In addition to the proposed subdivision of the 6.3 ± acres to accommodate 16 residential units
(see Section 3.2.1, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203) and the requested revisions to
the adopted Conditions imposed by the City upon VTT 32400 (see Section 3.2.3, Revisions
to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400), the Applicant has
identified a number of minor physical changes to the approved development plan for VTT
32400 as required to accommodate VTT 52203.
Proposed design modifications to that approved vesting tentative map are illustrated in Exhibit
5 (Amended Land Use Plan Over/ay) herein. These changes include, but are not limited to:
Conversion of all approved streets internal to VTT 32400 from public roadways to privately
owned and maintained rights-of-way.
• Minor lot line adjustments for select residential lots within VTT 32400
Construction of a restricted access gate at the northerly roadway (Street "A," VTT
32400), including both the reconfiguration of the project's entryway to create a cul-de-sac
surrounding an informational kiosk to provide adequate turnaround for motorists and the
s Identified as Street "D" in VTT 32400.
° Identified as Street "B" in VTT 32400.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-7
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
-// , � ' � ' \` �-- - � ;1!_ - �j ••• . -. :\f l 1. ` /w� � \` .r •• - - ? • �.��_ _
L _
r{�I I' / L � . ♦1' .�1�1��(�•� i;4. �^�'`�\�\I'tI��9)`t�)�. 111/111t I v ,,�, `\�// `
1111' 1�, �♦ �'i,., • `+ .`, d`1 � •. tu:,!,'�, .1{: •'141 `" v`�'
1. �•*"�' ��I ��?. � U,�l" r !� I' 4.i, - ,,�� , Er�lle' �' I �;�t � �1,�
��/ �r Fl / ,•�I- l� (�' �"•r �ti'i �+� I (ro) •� r 1 I TAY r, ,�,
_
"/� J � ,� / � ��' _ -.` _'•< 1 ,� ',. .III_ I C'�.._
/ /• )_/ � ' / �� / •1t1^• ••. '`'� �• h I/;f,r llI,t.f���/: "(. fi�. I � 1 rr '( I/il�t It ` `r•\ :•��•I
()I r()1/ t)�()
�. - l �:=.i- �`il' •�; .+Y," - Tw�tyr.,rbe II •� w.r-`�'�. '�' y
�'' � ��" �1 11� JI 'bl� •� � I
� I, �,�,� • ��I���I ..��� ';i �'�,�.�, �.: .I,;.i ,�
'\ �4Mirt RCrlf /\
.7 � I >\ \\� l \ ,./ II I (il �\ �\ 'J e/''l4 � _��1�/.t.�`'-( ��--lr•
1� i �1•'i� � .� - I i ..�J •1 ��� Ilrl
Overlay: Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 `• EXHIBIT 5
Base Map: Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400 AMENDED LAND USE PLAN OVERLAY
South Pointe Master Plan 3-8
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
introduction of a gated accessway to restrict unauthorized entry upon the project site.
• Construction of a restricted access gate at the southerly roadway (Street "D," VTT
32400), including both the reconfiguration of the project's entryway to create a cul-de-sac
surrounding an informational kiosk to provide adequate turnaround for motorists and the
introduction of a gated accessway to restrict unauthorized entry upon the project site..
• Reconfiguration of select residential lots at the southwestern terminus of Street "A" and
Street "B" (as indicated in VTT 32400) to allow for the development of a new roadway to
provide vehicular access to the westerly of the two residual residential lots.
• Reconfiguration of select residential lots at the southeastern terminus of Street "B" and
Street "C" (as indicated in VTT 32400) to allow for the development of a new roadway
to provide vehicular access to the easterly of the two residual residential lots.
• Reconfiguration of Street "B" (as indicated in VTT 32400), including the reconfiguration
of those residential lots adjoining that right-of-way.
• Revisions to the approved conceptual grading plan based upon the relocation by the District
of the stockpile soil (borrow) site from the South Pointe Middle School to the area
previously identified as VTT 51407.
• Revisions to the approved conceptual grading plan for VTT 32400 to create building pads,
street system, and associated infrastructure network for VTT 52203.
3.2.3 Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 324005
The Final EIR examined the potential environmental impacts associated with the development
of a larger 171 ± acre site, including 31 acres of commercial use which included 6.3 ± acres
of commercial development within the area of VTT 32400. Based upon actions subsequent
to the certification of that document by the City (e.g., the District's acquisition of a portion
of the South Pointe Master Plan Project site and the District's cessation of processing of VTT
51407), only a portion of that larger master plan project was approved by the City.
Additionally, as a component of that municipal action, the 6.3 ± acres of proposed commercial
use was subsequently redesignated for residential development.
In certifying the Final EIR and in approving VTT 32400, the City established a set of conditions
upon the then applicant (i.e., Arciero & Sons Inc.). Those conditions of approval included both
recommended mitigation measures as contained in the Final EIR, general conditions typically
imposed upon like -kind projects by the City, and project -specific conditions unique to the
approved action (Conditions). The adopted Conditions applied specifically to that project area
upon which discretionary actions were approved by the City.
s Unless otherwise specified herein, each of these revisions apply equally to VTT 52203 since VTT
32400 constitutes the underlying map upon which VTT 52203 will be approved.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-9
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As indicated herein, the Applicant seeks City's approval to construct 16 single-family dwelling
units upon that 6.3 t ac, a residual residential parcels previously approved VTT 32400. Based
upon this pending development proposal, a number of Conditions may no longer apply to the
project, as revised. Those changes to the adopted Conditions, as identified below, further
amend the project _description and have been considered in the preparation of this
environmental analysis.
Presented herein are those adopted Conditions which the Applicant has identified as no longer
applicable to the pending action. For each adopted Condition for which a request for deletion
or modification has been identified, the proposed revisions are presented in strikeout
(representing deletions to the existing language of the adopted Conditions).
The Applicant has requested that a number of adopted Conditions for VTT 32400 be deleted.
Each of those revised Conditions are included below, including a brief explanation concerning
why the requested revision is proposed at this time.
• Canditian D11: f rior to the issuance of permits for site grading, two (2) suitable oaks for
transplanting shall be selected, tagged and recommended to the City for relocation by a
qualified arborist. Selection criteria shall include access, health, structural feasibility for
transplantation and cost. In order to maintain wildlife food sources, an effort will be made
to select specimens for transplanting marked to indicate com. pass and slope orientation.
Trees shall be boxed by a method which minimizes shock and allows for the inclusion of
the maximum feasible amount of root hairs and associated soil. Indigenous mycorrhizac
shall be included with the root hairs and associated soil. Siting of transplanted oaks and
detailed transplanting methodology shall be coordinated by a qualified arborist. The oaks
to be transplanted and their specific locations shall be approved by the Community
Services Director.
► Explanation: Based upon consultation between the Applicant and a certified arborist,
it has been determined that the survival rate of mature oak trees following relocation
is, at best, uncertain. Since this condition was neither included as a mitigation measure
in the Final EIR nor specifically required in accordance with the City's Oak Tree
Ordinance,' the Applicant has requested its elimination. Resources which would
otherwise be allocated toward the fulfillment of this condition would be reallocated to
the implementation of the Applicant's Oak Tree Replacement Plan, as further required
under Conditions.
• Condition D21: /applicant should consider a united biological resource removal program,
prior to grading, to allow persons to remove selected vegetation at their own expense.
► Explanation: Liability issues associated with unrestricted access to the project site by
non-professional and uninsured individuals creates safety concerns affecting both the
Applicant and the general public. As a result, based upon those security and safety
concerns, the property owner is unable to comply with the terms of this condition.
6 Codified as Part 16, Chapter 22.56 of Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-10
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Condition E13: In order to miinimiFe the impact of the development of the project on solid
waste disposal facilities and systamis within the County of Los Angeles and to facilitate the
attainment of sourcc reduction and recycling objectives of the City of Diamond Bar, the
project proponent(s) shall: (a) consult with the City, the County Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works regarding
imple� mentation strategies to reduce and/or recycle wastes during construction and
following completion of those activities that would otherwise require disposal in local
landfills; and (b) consult with the current refuse removal colleetion com.pany(ics) regarding
design standards for aeeess to, location and construction of trash container enclosures,
and such other measures to facilitate implementation of automated refuse colleetion and
sourcc reduction and recycling options.
Explanation: The Applicant acknowledges that the project's design and operation will
be required to conform to all adopted source reduction and recycling requirements
which were established by the City and which were in force and effect at the time of
project approval. As a result, restatement of the Applicant's obligation to conform to
existing requirements constitutes an unnecessary and duplicative condition of approval
since compliance is already mandated under existing City policies.
• MRMI' 31: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angcles County Sheriff's
Department shall be provided the opportunity to review and corrinnent upon building plans:
(1) to facilitate emergency access; (2) to assure the consideration of design strategies
which facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and (3) to offer design
recommendations to reduce potential demands upon police services.
► Explanation: All street improvements shall conform to the City's subdivision standards.
The conversion of on-site roadways from public to private streets will significant reduce
potential project -related demands upon the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
• MRMf 32: Security features which shall be incorporated into the final design i may include:
(1) residential dwelling unit orientation which facilities "neighborhood involvement"
activities; (2) exterior security lighting; (3) well designed access for police patrols to
provide optimum observations; and (4) illuminated street addresses to ensure visibility from
the street for better patrol observation.
Explanation: The conversion of on-site roadways from public to private streets will
significant reduce potential project -related demands upon the Los Angeles County
Sheriff's Department.
• MRMI' 33: The Applicant or subsequent homeowners' association shall participate in
neighborhood involvement programs established by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Department to increase community awareness and, thereby, help reduce potential crime
occurrences in the City.
► Explanation: All street improvements shall conform to the City's subdivision standards.
The conversion of on-site roadways from public to private streets will significant reduce
potential project -related demands upon the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-11
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Applicant is unable to stipulate or control the subsequent operational activities of
that homeowners' association to be formed within the project site.
• MRMI' 48: following occupancy, trash bins and barrel recycling enclosures shall be
provided and � � Maintained in locations acceptable to the City of Diamiond Bar. Such
information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building perm. its.
► Explanation: No commercial waste hauling activities will be routinely conducted within
the project area.
• MRMI' 49: The /applicant or subsequent homeowners' association shall co;—..ply with those
source reduction and recycling and composting requirements as may be adopted by the
City of Diamond Bar, in accordance with Assembly [sill 030.
Explanation: The Applicant acknowledges that the project's design and operation will
be required to conform to all adopted source reduction and recycling requirements
which were established by the City and which were in force at the time of project
approval. As a result, restatement of the Applicant's obligation to conform to existing
requirements constitutes an unnecessary and duplicative condition of approval since
compliance is already mandated under existing City policies. The Applicant is unable
to stipulate or control the subsequent operational activities of that homeowners'
association which will be formed within the project site.
• WIMP S0: The /applicant or subsequent homeowners' association shall encourage the
segregation of green wastes, as specified under the City's Source Reduction Recycling
Element and County Sanitation Districts waste diversion policies.
Explanation: The Applicant acknowledges that the project's design and operation will
be required to conform to all adopted source reduction and recycling requirements
which were established by the City and which were in force at the time of project
approval. As a result, restatement of the Applicant's obligation to conform to existing
requirements constitutes an unnecessary and duplicative condition of approval since
compliance is already mandated under existing City policies. The Applicant is unable
to stipulate or control the subsequent operational activities of that homeowners'
association which will be formed within the project site.
MRMI' S1: The /applicant shall comply with all applicable City of Diamond Bar and County
of Los Angeles regulations, in force and effect at the time building permits are issued,
concerning drop off bins, trash enclosures and storage areas for recovered Materials,
recycling programs and other means of reducing the amount of waste requiring disposal
both during and after the project is implemented.
Explanation: The Applicant acknowledges that the project's design and operation will
be required to conform to all adopted source reduction and recycling requirements
which were established by the City and which were in force and effect at the time of
project approval. As a result, restatement of the Applicant's obligation to conform to
existing requirements constitutes an unnecessary and duplicative condition of approval
since compliance is already mandated under existing City policies.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-12
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MRMI' 52: The /applicant shall coordinate development plans with the Los Angelcs County
Department of f arks and Recreation to facilitate implernientation of the County's regional
trail system. If required by the County, adequate provisions (e.g., trail dedication, signage)
shall be provided to ensure the dedication of any required trail links.
Explanation: As indicated in the City of Diamond Bar General Plan (Figure V-5, Hiking
and Equestrian Trails, p. V-16), no hiking or equestrian trails exist upon or proximal to
the project site.
South Pointe Master Plan 3-13
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
SECTION 4.0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
As identified in Section 3.0 (Project Description) herein, a number of changes are proposed to
that project more thoroughly described and evaluated in the Final EIR.' All or some of the
minor technical changes identified herein have the potential to produce physical impacts upon
the environmental and, thereby, increase or decrease the severity of those environmental
effects described in the Final EIR. Presented herein is a comparative analysis between the
potential impacts associated with the implementation of the approved project (i.e., VTT
32400) and those potential environmental effects which may occur should VTT 52203 and/or
the revised project be implemented as proposed.
In addition, since the Final EIR (as part of its analysis of Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon
Preservation) assumed the commercial development of that 6.3 t acre area within VTT 32400
which was subsequently redesignated by the City for residential use, technical changes to the
Final EIR are required to provide consistency between that environmental disclosure document
and the project presently under consideration.
Each of the environmental issues and impacts which were addressed in the Final EIR have been
reexamined based upon the herein described revisions to the project to determine whether
those changes will result in additional impacts upon the environment or alter the nature or
significance of those impacts which were previously identified in the Final EIR.' Should the
proposed revisions result in the generation of new significant effects, additional mitigation
measures may be required to reduce or avoid those effects to a level comparable with or below
those levels identified in the Final EIR.'
For each of the topical issues examined in the Final EIR, the following analysis again references
the findings of that document. Those previously identified impacts are then separately
examined in the context of the three distinct components of the project description, as
presented in Section 3.0 (Project Description) herein. Those components include: (1) approval
' It is not the purpose of this Addendum to evaluate the potential cumulative impacts associated
with the development of the entire South Pointe Master Plan Project area. Those potential impacts
have been previously addressed in the Final EIR. This Addendum focuses exclusively upon the potential
environmental effects attributable to those changes to the approved project (i.e., VTT 32400) which
have been identified by the Applicant and described in Section 3.0 (Project Description) herein.
' Unless otherwise noted, those environmental impacts which are referenced in this Addendum
following each of the section headings herein (e.g., land use; earth; water) are excerpted from the Final
EIR. The majority of these effects relate to the development of the then proposed South Pointe Master
Plan Project and not specifically or exclusively to the implementation of VTT 32400.
3 Those Conditions which have been adopted by the City, unless otherwise amended herein, are
assumed to apply to the revised project. If, through the incorporation of Conditions, potential
environmental impacts will be reduced below a level of significance, no further mitigation measures or
new conditions of approval are required or recommended herein.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-1
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
of VTT 52203 (see Section 3.2.1); (2) design revisions to VTT 32400 (see Section 3.2.2); and
(3) revisions to the approved Conditions for VTT 32400 (see Section 3.2.3).
4.2 Land Use'
Since this Addendum is intended to augment the information presented in the Final EIR and
since that earlier environmental assessment assumed the commercial development of the 6.3 t
acre residual parcels, the proposed project is evaluated in the context of the earlier
environmental analysis conducted for the South Pointe Master Plan Project. Additionally, since
the City subsequently adopted a 93 -unit variation (inclusive of the two residual residential
sites) of Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon Preservation (Alternative No. 2)5 as the
"preferred project," the analysis presented in the Final EIR is further revised by this Addendum
to include the assessment of a net increase of 14 additional residential units upon that area
defined by the boundaries of VTT 32400.
In order to compare the current project with the environmental analysis presented in the Final
EIR, it is necessary to both compare the potential environmental impacts attributable to VTT
52203 with: (1) the commercial land use assumptions presented in the Final EIR for the South
Pointe Master Plan Project; and (2) the residential project (i.e., VTT 32400) subsequently
adopted by the City. Based upon the noncontiguous nature of TT 51253 and its physical
isolation from the pending project, that approved tentative map has not been included in this
environmental assessment.
As indicated in the Final EIR, the following environmental impacts were identified based upon
the assumed build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project:
• As proposed, project development is not consistent with applicable General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance policies applicable to the project area. Implementation will, therefore,
4 Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in Section
4.1 (Land Use) in the Final EIR.
5 In response to public and agency comments received by the City prior to the certification of the
Final EIR, that document included an analysis of a number of potential project alternatives, including
Alternative No. 2 - East/West Canyon Preservation. As indicated in Alternative No. 2, VTT 32400 was
assumed to contain only 75 residential units and no commercial land use component. As subsequently
revised by the City, Alternative No. 2 was redefined as the previously proposed 91 -unit subdivision,
including two residual residential lots upon which two single-family dwelling units could be developed.
In addition, under separate action, the City conditionally approved TT 51253 authorizing the
construction of 21 single-family dwellings in the northwesterly corner of the South Pointe Master Plan
Project area. Although the Final EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects associated with the
then proposed build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project (i.e., 200 units; 290,000 square feet
of commercial use), only 114 units (i.e., VTT 32400: 91 units; TT 51253: 21 units) have been
subsequently approved thereupon. Based upon the inclusion of VTT 52203, the total number of
dwelling units approved or proposed upon that master plan area now totals 128 units; no commercial
land uses are contained within the above referenced subdivision areas.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-2
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
necessitate a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to accommodate the proposed
land use (less-than-significant).6
• Project development will result in the long-term commitment of the project site to an urban
use, resulting in the loss of existing open space opportunities within the City (less -than -
significant).
• The introduction of commercial/office land uses in close proximity to proposed residential
units may produce potential land use conflicts (e.g., noise; light/glare) based upon
differences in the operational characteristics of those uses (less -than -significant).'
Based upon the above land use impacts, no applicable mitigation measures were identified in
the Final EIR or subsequent adopted by the City in response to the land use impacts identified
therein.
On July 25, 1995, following certification of the Final Environmentallmpact Report for the City
of Diamond Bar General Plan, SCH No. 91041083 and Addendum, the City adopted the City
of Diamond Bar General Plan, establishing land use and related policies governing the future
development of the City.
On October 18, 1995, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approved VTT 32400.8 In
taking that action, the City authorized the development of 93 dwelling units, including the two
dwelling units which could be constructed upon the 6.3 ± acre residual residential parcels. In
approving VTT 32400,9 the City made those findings required under Section 66473.5 of the
8 As indicated in the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan
(November 1992), the then existing City policies limited the development of the South Pointe Master
Plan Project site to a total of approximately 130 dwelling units. Based upon the then proposed
development of up to 200 residential units within the larger 171 ±acre planning area, the EIR concluded
that both a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be required to accommodate the
proposed land uses. The South Pointe Master Plan Project, if adopted, represented the then proposed
mechanism to impose site-specific policies and development standards thereupon.
As indicated in City Council Resolution No. 94-48, including the Findings of Fact and Statement
of Overriding Considerations as required under CEQA and Guidelines, based upon the City's election
to implement the alternative project in lieu of the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the City concluded
that this mitigation measure was no longer applicable to the revised project, as conditionally approved
by the City.
a In approving VTT 32400, the City made those findings required under Section 66473.5 of the
California Government Code. As required thereunder, "no local agency shall approve a tentative map,
or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, unless the legislative body finds that the
proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with
the general plan..."
9 As indicated in Section 21.38.060 (Vesting on Approval of Vesting Tentative Map) of Title 21
(Subdivisions) of the Los Angeles County Code, adopted by the City as the City's Subdivision
Ordinance, "the approval or conditional approval of a vesting tentative map by the advisory agency
shall establish a vested right to proceed with applicable ordinances and general and specific plans in
South Pointe Master Plan 4-3
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
California Government Code. As required thereunder, "no local agency shall approve a
tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, unless the
legislative body finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design
and improvement, is consistent with the general plan..."
In certifying the Final EIR and conditionally approving VTT 32400, the City adopted
environmental findings as required under Section 15091 of the CCR. As indicated in the
Findings, the following environmental impacts were identified based upon the implementation
of Alternative No. 2, as revised:
• As proposed, development of the South Pointe Master Plan is not consistent with
applicable City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies applicable to
the project area. Implementation will, therefore, necessitate a General Plan Amendment,
Zone Change and/or Conditional Use Permit to accommodate the proposed land use (less-
than-significant).70
• Project development will result in the long-term commitment of the project site to an urban
use, resulting in the loss of existing open space opportunities within the City (less -than
significant).
No applicable mitigation measures were identified in the Findings or subsequent adopted by
the City in response to the land use impacts identified therein.
In comparing the potential environmental impacts associated with the pending project with
those disclosed under Alternative 2, as presented in the Final EIR and in the Findings,
Since only 93 dwelling units were previously approved within the boundaries of VTT 32400,
this Addendum examines the impacts associated with a net increase of 14 dwelling units (i.e.,
from 93 units to 107 units) within the boundaries of that vesting tentative tract map.
Additionally, this Addendum compares the impacts attributable to the pending project against
those impacts which were disclosed in the Final EIR.
The Final EIR focused upon the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental affects
associated with the development of the entire 171 t acre South Pointe Master Plan Project
site. As indicated therein, 31 acres of commercial development was previously proposed upon
that larger site, authorizing the development of up to 290,000 square feet of commercial
development upon that acreage. The 6.3t acre residual parcels was initially part of that 31 -
effect at the date the accompanying application is deemed complete, pursuant to Government Code
Section 65943 in accordance with Sections 66474.2 and 66498.1 of said Government Code." As a
result of the City's prior approval of VTT 32400, that tentative map is not subject to any revised or
pending policies which may now exist in either the City of Diamond Bar General Plan or Zoning
Ordinance which may conflict with those policies in force and effect at the time of the City's earlier
action upon that project.
10 The above referenced impacts are excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-4
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
acre commercial use. Although no commercial development activities have been authorized
upon those residual properties, the analysis presented in the Final EIR was based upon a
commercial use of those sites. Since this Addendum is intended to augment the information
previously presented in the Final EIR, it is necessary to compare the pending pi oject with the
development assumption and environmental impacts identified therein.
Although the 6.3 ± acre site constituted a portion of a larger 31 -acre commercial development,
which included a number of additional commercial sites within the then proposed VTT 51407,
no specific square footage was assigned to each of the commercial sites identified as part of
the South Pointe Master Plan Project.
Assuming that the 6.3± acre site would be developed to the same commercial FAR as
presented in the Final EIR (i.e., 290,000 square feet/31 acres), an estimate 58,935 square feet
of commercial use could be constructed upon the two residual sites." Alternatively, in
accordance with the Land Use Goals, Objectives, and Strategies presented in the City of
Diamond Bar General Plan, "development of General Commercial areas will maintain a floor
area ratio (FAR) between 0.25 and 1.00."12 Based upon that "strategy," the two residual
parcels could accommodate between 68,600 and 274,425 square feet of commercial use.
Since few nonresidential properties are ultimately developed to the maximum density
authorized under existing policies,13 for the purpose of this analysis, an "average" or mid -value
(i.e., [(1.00 - 0.25) + 0.251 =2) FAR of 0.625 can be assumed for that commercial site.
Based upon that density, an estimated 171,520 square feet of commercial use could be
developed thereupon.
The City of Diamond Bar General Plan states that "detailed data on local FARs [for
nonresidential uses] was not available, because shopping centers support a variety of
commercial, office, and /or business park uses. However, a selective representative survey
of local centers indicates the following FARs are most applicable to Diamond Bar uses, and can
be considered representative for planning purposes: Commercial = 0.24, Office = 0.38, and
11 Since the City did not ultimately act upon the totality of the South Pointe Master Plan Project,
no specific floor -area -ratio (FAR) for commercial development was adopted by the City for the South
Pointe Master Plan Project area.
12 City of Diamond Bar, City of Diamond Bar General Plan, July 25, 1995, Strategy 1.1.3(b), p•
1-11.
13 As indicated in the Land Use Element of the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, "average
commercial/industrial FARs are based on existing development patterns. For various reasons, many
parcels in the community have not been developed to their maximum density or intensity and, in the
future, maximum development as described in this [Land Use] Element can be expected to occur only
on a limited number of parcels. Development at an intensity or density between the expected and
maximum levels can occur only where projects offer exceptional design quality, important public
amenities or benefits, or other factors that promote important goals and policies of the General Pian"
(p. 1-24).
South Pointe Master Plan 4-5
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Business Park - 0.32."14 Based upon a FAR of 0.24, an estimated 65,850 square feet of
commercial use could be constructed upon that residual acreage.
As indicated by the above discussion, it is evident that a wide range of development intensities
could be assumed for the 6.3 t acre commercial site and a reasonable argument provided for
any of the densities selected. For the purpose of this environmental analysis, a FAR of 0.24
has been selected and will be utilized for comparative analysis. Based upon this assumption,
the proposed 16 dwelling units proposed as part of VTT 52203 would now replace the 65,850
square feet of commercial use which was addressed in the Final EIR.
From a land use perspective, notwithstanding whether commercial use or residential units are
developed upon the project site, the conversion of the project area from its existing natural
condition to any form of urban use will result in both the long-term commitment of that
property to that use and the concomitant loss of open space opportunities thereupon.
Where land uses of different intensities or uses are planned adjacent to one another, it is the
City's policy to "ensure that individual site designs and operations are managed in such a
manner as to avoid the creation of nuisances and hazards."15 Notwithstanding this policy,
development of a commercial use directly adjacent to a residential use could create land use
conflicts affecting any adjoining or proximal residential development.
In comparison to a commercial use, under a residential development scenario each of the
resulting dwelling units will be located upon separate lots with a significant portion of each
property allocated for landscaping. As a result, the apparent mass of a residential subdivision
is less perceptible that a comparably -sized commercial use. At maturity, based upon the
extensive use of landscaping in a residential tract, the resulting development character may
present a less stark appearance that a corresponding large expanse of parking within a
commercial development.
By revising the development scheme to include residential uses (rather than a commercial use),
any potential conflict associated with different adjoining land use activities would be
eliminated. For example, as previously indicated in the Final EIR, the introduction of commercial
uses directly adjacent to residential uses may result in the creation of potential land use
conflicts attributable to the different characteristics of those uses. Similarly, since no
commercial land uses now exist in the general project area, the introduction of a commercial
use directly adjacent to those residential uses authorized upon VTT 32400 may impact those
future residential units.
Since no additional impacts have been identified and since certain environmental effects (as
identified in the Final EIR) would occur to a lesser degree than identified therein, the proposed
construction of residential units in lieu of a commercial use thereupon will result in a lesser
environmental impact than that described in the Final EIR.
1 ° Op. Cit., City of Diamond Bar General Plan, Land Use Element, p. 1-2.
15 Op. Cit., City of Diamond Bar General Plan, Land Use Element, Strategy 2.2.3, p. 1-19.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-6
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.2.1 Approval of VTT 52203
As approved by the City, up to two residential units could be constructed upon the two
residual residential parcels within VTT 32400. Proposed is the subdivision of that 6.3±acre
site to accommodate the development of 16 residential units and the grading of that area to
accommodate building pads and the supporting street and associated infrastructure system
thereupon. Implementation of VTT 52203 would, therefore, result in a net increase of 14
dwelling units above that level approved by the City.
As indicated in the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, the entire area of VTT 32400 (inclusive
of the two residential lots) is designated "RL Low Density Residential (max. 3 du/acre)."18 As
further indicated in the Land Use Element, it is the City's policy to "designate existing
developed single family detached residential parcels as Low Density Residential on the Land
Use Map. The maximum density of such Low Density Residential parcels will be 3.0 dwelling
units per gross acre (3.0 du/ac), or existing density, whichever is greater.""
When viewed in isolation of the remainder of VTT 32400, based upon this general plan
designation, 18 residential dwelling units can be constructed upon the 6.3±acres; however,
when viewed in combination with the remainder of VTT 32400, the entire 48 ± project site
can accommodate up to 144 dwelling units. Since the proposed density does not exceed that
authorized under the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, the project is consistent with the land
use policies established therein.
As further indicated in the City's Zoning Map, the two lots within VTT 32400 are designated
"R-1 15,000." Pursuant to Section 22.20.070 et seq. of the Los Angeles County Planning and
Zoning Code, adopted by the City as the City's Zoning Ordinance, residential land uses are
authorized thereupon with a minimum average lot size of 15,000 square feet. Based upon the
gross acreage of those properties (i.e., 6.3 ± acres), 18 dwelling units could be constructed
upon those properties. However, when considered in combination with the total acreage
within VTT 32400 (i.e., 48± acres), a total of 139 dwelling units could be constructed upon
the entire project area. Since the combined number of units for both VTT 32400 (i.e., 93
units) and VTT 52203 (i.e., net increase of 14 units) is less than total, the project conforms
with the minimum average lot size requirements established under the City's Zoning Ordinance.
In describing residential densities in the general project area, the City of Diamond Bar General
Plan states that "along the 57 Freeway and 60 Freeway corridors, single family lots are
generally under 10,000 square feet. Detached single family developments in these areas have
been built at 3 - 5 dwelling units per acre, which represents over half of the City's entire
housing stock."18 The proposed 16 -lot subdivision appears consistent with both the site's
existing zoning designation and with existing residential densities in the general project area.
16 /bid., Land Use Element, Figure 1-2, Land Use Map, p. 1-27.
17 /bid., Land Use Element, Strategy 1.1.1(b), p. 1-10.
18 Ibid., Land Use Element, pp. 1-1 and 1-2.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-7
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The subdivision of the area of VTT 52203 into 16 residential lots will result in a street system
and lot configuration typical of other residential areas within the City. Based upon the net
increase of 14 units, the project area will be transformed from two "estate" sized lots
(averaging over three acres in size) to 16 lots more characteristic of other near site residential
development. This action will result in an intensification of the tract map area and potentially
increase in the amount of impervious surfaces upon the project site.
From a land use perspective, these changes will not result in the introduction of any no
additional environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR. Additionally, since
no General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, or Conditional Use Permit will be required to
accommodate the proposed use, the potential impacts associated with this project will be less
than previously identified in the Findings. As a result, no additional mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.2.2 Design Revisions to VTT 3240019
Although a vesting tentative map has been previously approved by the City, authorizing the
construction of 91 single-family units within that portion of VTT 32400 external to VTT
52203, the Applicant has identified a number of design revisions to that subdivision map area
as required to accommodate the potential development of VTT 52203. In revising the
previously approved map, the Applicant has neither revised the tract map boundaries nor
increased the number of dwelling units to be constructed thereupon. As a result,
notwithstanding any resulting municipal actions affecting that approved subdivision map, the
area of physical impact will be confined to that area previously considered by the City. No
additional open space opportunities will be lost, no additional area beyond that described in the
Final EIR will undergo transformation from an open space to an urbanized use, and no
additional impacts will result from an increase in on-site residential densities.
Based upon the subsequent elimination of VTT 51407 from the South Pointe Master Plan
Project, necessary revisions to the previously grading plan (as presented in the Final EIR) have
been proposed. With the exception of the borrow site, the proposed access road between
Brea Canyon Road and the South Pointe Middle School, and the off-site slope easement
required for both the construction of that access road and the development of VTT 32400 (to
be obtained from the District), no additional off-site areas will not be impacted by the projeCt. 20
19 The proposed design revisions to VTT 32400 address only that portion of the approved tract
map external to the area of VTT 52203. Since the Final EIR examined only the residential use of that
project area and since the City (by approving VTT 32400) subsequently precluded the potential
commercial development of that portion of VTT 32400 addressed herein, this environmental analysis
does not include a comparative assessment between the proposed design revisions to VTT 32400 and
the potential commercial development of that project site.
20 Independent of VTT 32400, the District has independently conducted significant grading
operations upon that area previously identified as VTT 51407. Those grading activities have been
undertaken in response to both the District's need to relocate the soil stockpile site from the South
Pointe Middle School campus site to the area of VTT 51407 to accommodate the development of the
permanent school facility and the implementation of those remedial grading activities required to
stabilize on-site and near -site slope areas following the May 1995 landslide upon that property.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-8
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Based upon the District's relocation of its soil stockpile site, the borrow site has been moved
from the area of the South Pointe Middle School to that area previously identified as VTT
51407. Prior to the relocation of that surplus material, the District removed existing (native)
vegetation from the new stockpile site. Surface irrigation and temporary landscaping has been
provided thereupon to minimize fugitive dust and erosionary impacts. Since no sensitive plant
materials presently exist upon that stockpile site, the proposed revisions to the off-site grading
plan will not result in the introduction of new impacts upon any previously undisturbed area.
The construction of the approved access road between Brea Canyon Road and the South
Pointe Middle School will be located, in part, within that area of VTT 32400 now identified as
VTT 52203. The remainder of that right-of-way will be constructed within that area previously
identified as VTT 51407, now owned by the District. The environmental effects associated
with that access road were examined in the Final EIR. As indicated therein, that proposed
roadway would service both the school site and ultimately connect to Morning Sun Drive,
located westerly of the master plan area. As now proposed, the access road would terminate
at the South Pointe Middle School and the District would install and maintain traffic control
devices (e.g., removable barricades) designed to prevent privately -owned vehicles from
traveling from that access road through the school site to Larkstone Drive.
Based upon the presence of that access road, the District's ability to develop the eastern
portion of the area of VTT 51407, now under District ownership, may be enhanced. The
proposed alignment of that roadway creates a separate parcel, located northerly of the access
road and southerly of the area of VTT 52203. As indicated in the City's Zoning Map, both
that residual lot and the area located southerly and westerly of that access road is designated
"RPD 10,000 6U." The Land Use Map contained in the City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan
identifies that area as "PA-4/SP (Planning Area No. 4/Specific Plan)." As indicated therein:
PA -4 consists of 82 vacant acres and is located west of Brea Canyon Road, north of
Peaceful Hills Road and south of South Pointe Middle School. Land use designations
appropriate for this planning areas include Park (PK), Public Facilities (PF) and Open
Space (OS). The most sensitive portion of the site shall be retained in permanent open
space. The site plan shall incorporate the planning and site preparation to
accommodate the development of Larkstone Park of a suitable size and location to
serve the neighborhood as approved by the City.21
The City of Diamond Bar General Plan further states that "all proposed development within
these designated [Specific Plan] areas shall require the formulation of a Specific Plan pursuant
to the provision of Government Code Section 65450. Land uses which may be appropriate
within the planning areas shall be subject to public hearings and approval of the City
Council."22 In accordance with this policy, neither the residual lot nor the remainder of the
area previously identified as VTT 51407 would not be considered a legal building site by the
City without subsequently approved by the City Council. Similarly, although improved access
21 /bid., City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan, Land Use Element, p. 1-17.
22 /bid., Land Use Element, Strategy 1.1.8, p. 1-12.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-9
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
would be provided to the remainder of the District's holdings in Sandstone Canyon, no
entitlement exist upon that area without formal action by the City.
Many of the requested revisions to VTT 32400 result directly from the further intensification
of the two residual residential parcels (located in the southerly portion of that tract map). In
order to provide adequate vehicular access to that area, an internal street system has been
proposed which obtains access from those lettered streets now illustrated on the approved
tentative map. By extending Street "A" and Street "C" (as indicated on VTT 32400)
southward into the VTT 52203 and cul-de-sacing those streets prior to connection with Street
"D" (as indicated on VTT 32400), those street extensions provide double -loaded access to the
resulting 16 -lot subdivision.
The revised roadway system for VTT 32400, as illustrated in Exhibit 5 (Amended Land Use
Plan Over/ay), results in both the reconfiguration of a number of lots and minor alterations to
the resulting intersections of those lettered streets. In reconfiguring both the street system
and lot layout, the Applicant has neither increased nor decreased the number of residential
units to be constructed upon the subject property.
As indicated above, the project site is zoned "R-1 15,000." Under this designation, although
individual lot sizes may vary, the average lot sizes shall be not less than 15,000 square feet.
The majority of lots within VTT 32400, including those residential parcels previously approved
by the City and those reconfigured lots identified above, are individually less than 15,000
square feet. As indicated in the submitted map, the minimum lot size upon VTT 52203 is
approximately 9,800 square feet. When viewed in the context of the entire 48 ± acre map
area, inclusive of all common landscape areas, all the residential lots within VTT 32400
(inclusive of VTT 52203) average approximately 19,180 square feet.
Based upon this analysis, the proposed design revisions to VTT 32400 will neither result in the
introduction of new land use impacts nor increase the severity of those impacts described in
the Final EIR. As a result, no additional mitigation measures have been identified herein.
4.2.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 3240023
As described in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 32000), the Applicant has identified a number of adopted Conditions which the
Applicant has requested be deleted or otherwise revised. None of the Conditions identified
therein will manifest as physical impacts upon or changes to the environment .2' Based upon
the absence of any physical direct or indirect effect thereupon, those revisions will not produce
either new environmental consequences (not previously disclosed in the Final EIR) or increase
the severity of those impacts identified therein. As a result, no additional mitigation measures
are recommended herein.
23 The proposed revisions to adopted Conditions for VTT 32400 potentially affect both that tract
map area and any future land uses proposed within the area of VTT 52203.
24 As indicated under Section 15358(c) of the CCR, "effects analyzed under CEQA must be related
to a physical change."
South Pointe Master Plan 4-10
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.3 Earth25
The South Pointe Master Plan Project, as described in the Final EIR, assumed the commercial
development of that 6.3 t acre site identified herein as VTT 52203. As indicated therein, the
following environmental impact was identified based upon the build -out of the then proposed
South Pointe Master Plan Project:
Project development will introduce future project area residents, employees and structures
to seismically active southern California and, thereby, expose those individuals and
improvements to those geotechnical hazards evident within the region (less -than -
significant).
Based upon comments subsequently received by the City following the dissemination of that
EIR, the Final EIR concluded that the then proposed landform alterations to the area of
Sandstone Canyon constituted a significant unavoidable adverse impact. Although the
subsequent elimination of VTT 51407 would minimize that identified effect, the remaining
grading activities required for the implementation of VTT 32400 would continue to be judged
significant.
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Based upon those measures, the
Final EIR concluded that the development of the project site for commercial use could be
effectively mitigated below a level of significance.
Following certification of the Final EIR, the City adopted Findings pursuant to CEO,A and
Guidelines which specifically addressed the project subsequently approved by the Lead Agency
(i.e., VTT 32400). As further indicated in the Findings, the following environmental impacts
upon earth resources were identified based upon the implementation of Alternative No. 2, as
revised:
Alternative project development will introduce future alternative project area residents,
employees and structures to seismically active southern California and, thereby, expose
those individuals and improvements to those geotechnical hazards evident within the region
(less -than -significant)."
Implementation of the alternative project will result in landform alterations in the vicinity
of those grading activities required to create the building pads and systems for that
development activity authorized thereunder (significant).
" Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.2 (Earth) in the Final EIR.
26 The above referenced impacts are excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400. The "alternative project" referenced therein relates, in part,
to VTT 32400, as revised and as conditionally approved by the City Council on October 18, 1994.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-11
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
As part of the City's approval of VTT 32400, certain mitigation measures (as contained in the
Final EIR) were adopted by the City as conditions of project approval. Those measures
included: (1) All geologic, geotechnical and soils studies conducted for the project and all
engineering analysis conducted for the proposed grading plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the City prior to the final approval of the tentative map; and (2) All grading,
earthwork and associated development activities shall be designed and conducted in
accordance with applicable City and County standards and shall conform with
recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation for Tentative
Tract No. 32400, County of Los Angeles (Petra Geotechnical, Inc., October 18, 1988),
Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation for 80 Acre Development N/0 Pathfinder Rd. And W/O
Brea Canyon Rd. (RMA Group, September 21, 1992) and such other geotechnical reports as
may be prepared for the site and/or required by the City and County.
As further indicated in Findings, the City concluded that implementation of the proposed
residential project will neither diminish nor increase the project's potential geologic,
geotechnical, or seismic impacts beyond that level disclosed in the Final EIR. As stated
therein, adequate Conditions are presently in place to ensure that the project's construction
and operation will occur in accordance with established design standards and sound
engineering practices.
4.3.1 Approval of VTT 52203
As presented in the Final EIR, the geologic, geotechnical, and seismic characteristics of the
entire area of the South Pointe Master Plan Project have been previously evaluated. Based
upon that information, the Final EIR concluded that the entire 171 t acre site could be feasibly
developed from a geotechnical perspective. The Final EIR, however, concluded that the then
proposed landform alterations to the area of Sandstone Canyon constituted a significant
unavoidable adverse impact.
Implementation of VTT 32400, as conditionally approved by the City, will necessitate
significant landform alterations in the area of that subdivision map, including both the area of
off-site slope easements conveyed by the District and the borrow site (located upon that area
previously identified as VTT 51407). Implementation of the grading plan for VTT 32400 will
result in the provision of the two residual residential parcels which constitute the area of VTT
52203. As a result, since those two residual lots can now be developed for residential use
based upon the City's prior approval of VTT 32400 and since the Final EIR has previously
examined the potential environmental effects associated with those landform alterations, the
further intensification of that residential use (i.e., net increase of 14 units) would have minimal
direct landform impacts beyond that described in the Final EIR. However, from a cumulative
perspective, inclusive of all grading activities associated with VTT 32400, the potential
cumulative landform impacts attributable to VTT 52203 will remain significant.
In May 1995, a slope failure occurred within the northwestern portion of the larger South
Pointe Master Plan Project site. That slope failure, which occurred in an area which is
noncontiguous with either VTT 32400 or VTT 52203, was subsequently remediated by the
District through extensive grading operations in the area of that landslide. Remedial grading
operations conducted by the District resulted in significant landform alterations within that area
previously identified as VTT 51407, including the removal of a significant amount of the
South Pointe Master Plan 4-12
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
existing vegetation thereupon. Based upon the distance between VTT 52203 and the area
affected and based upon the orientation of that landslide relative to the project site, neither
the recent landslide nor the resulting grading activities are anticipated to impact the area of
VTT 52203 or the geotechnical conditions thereupon.
Further construction -level geotechnical studies have been initiated by the Applicant and will
be submitted to the City upon completion. In recognition of those adopted Conditions which
have been imposed upon the project site, any design or engineering recommendations which
are subsequently identified therein shall become additional conditions of approval upon the
project. Implementation of those engineering recommendations, in combination with the
existing Conditions established by the City, will ensure that all on-site and near -site (e.g.,
borrow site) grading operations are conducted in accordance with sound engineering practices
and that all subsurface and near -surface conditions are conducive to the subsequent habitation
of the resulting building pads.
Since the Final EIR included a detailed examination of those geotechnical conditions affecting
not only the project site but also other contiguous and noncontiguous areas within the larger
South Pointe Master Plan Project site, the City has been provided information concerning both
the areas of VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 as well as information concerning other properties
situated in proximity to that site. Based upon this information, sufficient technical analyses
has been prepared to conclude that the proposed residential development can be feasibly
constructed in the location and manner proposed.
Since this Addendum has neither identified the presence of any new significant environmental
effects nor concluded that the severity of those environmental effects identified in the Final
EIR would increase beyond the levels previously disclosed, no additional mitigation measures
have been identified herein.
4.3.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Implementation of VTT 32400, as revised herein, will result in both physical alterations to the
on-site area of that subdivision map and to those off-site areas inclusive of the borrow site,
proposed access road to the South Pointe Middle School, and to the area of the slope
easement located southerly of the tract map boundaries upon that area previously identified
as VTT 51407. As indicated in the Final EIR, based upon those mitigation measures contained
therein, the City has concluded that the project site can be feasibly developed from a
geotechnical perspective.
Although the borrow site has been relocated away from the South Pointe Middle School las
described in the Final EIR) to a new site situated southerly of that location, the surplus soil
material created by the initial grading of the school site was intended for and remains available
for subsequent use as fill material for VTT 32400. Since the borrow site is directly contiguous
with the area of VTT 32400, construction equipment will be able to access that borrow site
without necessitating transport across or upon public streets. The removal of that material
from its new site, therefore, does not result in the introduction of new environmental impacts
not previously addressed in the Final EIR.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-13
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Similarly, although the approved access road between Brea Canyon Road and the South Pointe
Middle School may facilitate the implementation of those development plans that the District
may presently have or may subsequently formulate for its holdings in Sandstone Canyon, the
City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan designates that area southerly of VTT 32400 as "Specific
Plan." As a result of that designation, no municipal entitlements for on-site uses will be
provided prior to the preparation of a specific plan and subsequent consideration of any
development proposal(s) by the City Council.
Since the implementation of the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 will neither result in the
introduction of new land uses not previously considered in the Final EIR nor authorize
development beyond those boundaries now authorized by the City, development of the project
site in accordance with those mitigation measures adopted as conditions of project approval
can be safely accommodated without imposing atypical geologic, geotechnical, and seismic
risks upon project area residents. Since all grading and related construction activities will
conform to both existing City standards (e.g., Uniform Building Code) and the recommendation
of site-specific geotechnical studies, no additional impacts upon earth resources are anticipated
hereunder. In the absence of either new environmental impacts and/or an increase in the
severity of those impacts disclosed in the Final EIR, no further mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.3.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
None of the revised Conditions identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32000) herein will produce a physical impact upon the
environment. Based upon the absence of any physical direct or indirect effect, those revisions
will neither produce new environmental consequences not previously disclosed in the Final EIR
nor increase the severity of those impacts identified therein. As a result, no additional
mitigation measures have been recommended by the City.
4.4 Hydrology/Water Quality 27
As indicated in the Final EIR, the following water -related impact was identified based upon the
then proposed build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project:
Project implementation will alter existing drainage patterns on-site, including increasing the
quantity of stormwater discharged to the regional storm drain system and decreasing the
quality of that run-off. In addition, proposed grading activities will result in the disposal
of dredged or fill material into two blueline streams as identified on the 7.5 -minute USGS
Yorba Linda Quadrangle. Those watercourses may be subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish
and Game and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (less -than -significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
27 Information in this section supplements that
pp previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.3 (Water) in the Final EIR.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-14
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Based upon those measures, the
Finat EIR concluded that the development of the project site fof, commercial use could be
effectively mitigated below a level of significance.
Following the District's acquisition of the area of VTT 51407, the District elected to cease the
further processing of that tentative map. Based upon the resulting reduction in the build -out
scenario for the South Pointe Master Plan and the potential retention of that area in its natural
state, the hydrologic and water quality impacts associated with the implementation of the
South Pointe Master Plan and the individual projects addressed therein have been further
reduced below those assumptions presented in the Final EIR. Although the above referenced
less -than -significant impact will continue to occur (based upon the City's approval of VTT
32400 and TT 51253), that effect will manifest to a lesser degree that specified in the Final
EIR. For example, post -project stormwater volumes will decrease since a larger percentage
of the site will not receive impervious coverage.
Following certification of the Final EIR and prior to approval of VTT 32400, the City adopted
Findings for that project. As indicated in the Findings, the following environmental impact was
identified based upon the implementation of Alternative No. 2, as revised:
Alternative project implementation has the potential to alter existing drainage patterns on-
site, including increasing the quantity of stormwater discharged to the regional storm drain
system and decreasing the quality of that run-off. In addition, proposed grading activities
will result in the disposal of dredged or fill material into two blueline streams as identified
on the 7.5 -minute USGS Yorba Linda Quadrangle. Those watercourses may be subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, California
Department of Fish and Game and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (less-
than-significant).za
As part of the City's approval of VTT 32400, certain mitigation measures (as contained in the
Final EIR) were adopted by the City as conditions of project approval. Those measures
included: (1) Drainage shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer of the
City of Diamond Bar and/or the County Engineer of Los Angeles County. The design and
installation of project drainage facilities shall be in accordance with the flow criteria, design
standards and construction requirements of the Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works and/or the City of Diamond Bar; (2) The project proponent(s) shall be financially
responsible for the following items: (a) the construction or advancement of funds for the
construction of any required on-site drainage improvements as contained in the Master Plan
of Drainage Facilities, approved by the City Engineer of the City of Diamond Bar and/or County
Engineer of Los Angeles County; (b) the construction of in -tract and off-site storm drain
system improvements as required by the City Engineer and/or County Engineer; and (c) any
permits or other assessments imposed by the City Engineer and/or County Engineer; (3) Prior
to the approval of the final tract map, a special maintenance district or other funding
28 The above referenced impact is excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400. The "alternative project" referenced therein relates, in part,
to VTT 32400, as conditionally approved by the City Council on October 18, 1994.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-15
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
mechanism acceptable to and approved by the City Engineer of the City of Diamond Bar and/or
County Engineer of Los Angeles County shall be established for the maintenance of on-site
storm drainage facilities; (4) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for any proposed
alternation to the streambed of that watercourse which exists on-site, the project
proponent(s), if applicable under State and/or federal law, shall obtain a Section 404 permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the placement of dredged or fill materials into the
"waters of the United States," and a Section 1601 -1607 permit from the California
Department of Fish and Game for proposed streambed alterations which may impact existing
riparian areas; and (5) Prior to the initiation of grading operations, the project proponent(s) shall
obtain all applicable construction, stormwater and NPDES permits as may be required by the
City, the County of Los Angeles and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for
the discharge of urban pollutants.
In conditionally approving VTT 32400, the City deleted the then proposed commercial land use
upon the 6.3 ± acre site now defined as VTT 52203. Based upon the creation of two building
sites (identified as Lots 92 and 93 in VTT 32400), the City authorized the construction of two
single-family dwelling units thereupon. In order to compare the potential environmental
impacts associated with those units with the information presented in the Final EIR, certain
assumptions have been made herein.
For the purpose of this analysis, it has been assumed that the previously commercial
development of the two commercial parcels would produce a FAR of 0.24, resulting in the
construction of approximately 65,850 square feet of commercial use upon that site. Based
upon a parking requirement of one automobile space for each 250 square feet of commercial
use, an estimated 263 parking spaces would be required on-site. Assuming that each parking
space requires about 350 space feet of paved surface (inclusive of aisle width), approximately
2.1 ± additional site acres would be allocated for parking and covered with an impervious
surface material. When this area is added to the established FAR, at maximum, only about 40
percent of the commercial site would be theoretically retained in open area. In contrast, low-
density residential uses typically include a larger percentage of the overall project site in an
open space use.
Based upon this assumption, stormwater discharged from the commercial site may be of
significantly greater quantity and lesser quality that comparable runoff discharged from a
residential development of lesser intensity.
4.4.1 Approval of VTT 52203
The further residential intensification of the area of VTT 52203 from a total of two dwelling
units to 16 units will result in an increase in the percentage of the project area which will be
covered with impervious materials. The construction of internal roadways, driveways,
associated flatwork, and the units themselves will minimize on-site water percolation and
increase the quantity of water discharged to local and regional storm drain systems. In
addition, as rainwater falls upon roadway surfaces, it collects those petroleum products and
other materials located thereupon. As a result, as the percentage of site coverage increases,
both the quantity of stormwater increase and the quality of that stormwater runoff decreases.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-16
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Since any development upon the project site will be subject to receipt of a National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and associated construction and stormwater discharge
permits and since those permits promote compliance with the federal Clean Water Act, no
significant water quality impacts are anticipated based upon the residential use of the project
site. NPDES and associated permit conditions will ensure that all stormwaters discharged to
areawide storm drain systems conform Regional Water Quality Control Board and local agency
(e.g., County of Los Angeles) standards.
As indicated in the Final EIR, those regional storm drain conduits which service the area of VTT
32400 are adequately sized to accommodate both project -related and anticipated cumulative
demands. Since the total quantity of discharge will be significantly less than evaluated in the
Final EIR based upon the deletion of VTT 51407, project implementation is not anticipated to
introduce new impacts not previously disclosed therein. Additionally, since the severity of
potential hydrologic and water quality impacts will be reduced below that level disclosed in the
Final EIR, no further mitigation measures have been recommended by the City.
4.4.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Those revisions to VTT 32400 identified in Section 3.2 (Revisions to Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 32400) herein, will not significantly increase the percentage of the project site
covered with impervious building materials. All water discharged to the project's roadway
system will be collected through a network of curbs and gutters and conveyed to either the
existing 60 -inch pipe located in Rapidview Drive (P.D. 141 1) or the 60 -inch Caltrans' facility
located in Brea Canyon Road. Both conduits have been determined to have adequate capacity
to accommodate both project -related and cumulative project demands.
Based upon the continuing application of those Conditions established by the City, as modified
herein, all project -related impacts will be mitigated below a level of significance. In the
absence of either new environmental impacts or an increase in the severity of those impacts
identified in the Final EIR, no further mitigation measures have been recommended.
4.4.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
Since none of the revised Conditions identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted
Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32000) herein will produce either a physical
impact upon the environment or otherwise effect the quantity or quality of water discharged
from the project site, no additional mitigation measures are either recommended or required
under CEQA.
4.5 Biological Resources29
As indicated in the Final EIR, the following environmental impacts were identified based upon
the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project:
29 Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.4 (Biological Resources) in the Final EIR.
4-17
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
• Project implementation will result in the removal of the majority of existing on-site
vegetation, resultii ig in both the replacement of that vegetation with a plant palette more
traditionally associated with developed areas and a corresponding loss of habitat value
(less -than -significant).
• Grading activities will result in the placement of dredged or fill materials in two blueline
streams as identified on the USGS Yorba Linda Quadrangle (less -than -significant).
• Project development will result in the removal of an estimated 768 specimen -sized oak
trees (92 percent of all oak trees [within the larger master plan area]) and will necessitate
both the on-site and off-site replacement of those trees in accordance with established
public policy (significant).
• Grading activities, including the removal of existing trees on-site, has the potential to affect
nesting birds of prey (raptors) which may inhabit the property during those operations (less -
than -significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Based upon comments received
upon the EIR, that document concluded that the potential impacts upon the oak tree resources
located upon the South Pointe Master Plan Project site would be significant, notwithstanding
the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR.
Although no development has been approved upon the District's property within Sandstone
Canyon, remedial grading activities conducted by the District following the May 1995 landslide
in the westerly section of that property has resulted in the removal of a significant proportion
of the vegetation upon that site. These actions have occurred independent of either the
proposed action or the South Pointe Master Plan Project and reflect emergency measures
performed by the District to mitigate potential public health and safety hazards associated with
that landslide.
As an alternative to the approval of the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the City elected to
implement one of a number of alternative projects identified in the Final EIR. Following
certification of the Final EIR and prior to the conditional approval of VTT 32400, the City
adopted a specific set of findings addressing the potential impacts associated with that
alternative project. As indicated therein, the following environmental impacts were identified
based upon the implementation of Alternative No. 2, as revised:
Alternative project implementation will result in the removal of that on-site vegetation
which presently exists within and proximal to the areas where grading operations are
anticipated (less-than-significant).30
30 The above referenced impact is excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400. The "alternative project" referenced therein relates, in part,
to VTT 32400, as conditionally approved by the City Council on October 18, 1994.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-18
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Grading activities will result in the placement of dredged or fill materials in two blueline
streams as identified on the USGS Yorba Linda Quadrangle (less -than -significant).
• Grading activities, including the removal of existing trees on-site, has the potential to affect
nesting birds of prey (raptors) which may inhabit the property during those operations (less -
than -significant).
• Alternative project development may necessitate the removal of approximately 333
specimen -sized oak trees presently located within and adjoining the areas where grading
operations and associated activities are anticipated (significant).
As part of the City's approval of VTT 32400, certain mitigation measures (as contained in the
Final EIR) were adopted by the City as conditions of project approval. Those measures
included: (1) The landscape palette for the project shall emphasize the use of drought tolerant,
native plant species with low-water requirements, adapted to the inland southern California
climate. Plants used in landscaping shall include those which provide nectar, fruit or seeds as
food for native wildlife species. With the proper selection and placement of native plants, the
proposed development would retain some of its natural value. Recommended plants for
landscaping include: Big -Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyl/a), Bigberry Manzanita (Arctostaphylos
glauca), Coyote Brush (Baccharis pilularis), Ceanothus (Ceanothus spp.), Redbud (Cercis
occidentalis), Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), Honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.), California
Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), Holly -Leaved Cherry (Prunus ilicifolia), California Coffeeberry
(Rhamnus californica), Holly -Leaved Redberry (Rhamnus ilicifolia), Sugarbush (Rhus ovata),
Chaparral Currant (Ribes malvaceum), Our Lord's Candle (Yucca whippleij, and California -
Fuchsia (Zauschneria californica); (2) Prior to the implementation of grading operations, the
project proponent(s) shall prepare and the City of Diamond Bar shall review and consider a
watering plan for newly planted areas; and upon acceptance by the City, the project
proponent(s) shall implement the watering schedule specified therein until such time as
vegetation in those areas is established; (3) Prior to the initiation of grading activities, the
project proponent(s) shall obtain an oak tree permit(s) in accordance with Part 16 -Chapter
22.56 of Title 22 (Planning and Zoning Code) of the Los Angeles County Code, or similar
ordinance enacted by the City prior to the commencement of grading operations, and shall
comply with all conditions imposed upon the recipient(s) of that permit(s) issued by the County
of Los Angeles Fire Department (Forestry Division) and/or the City of Diamond Bar; (4) Prior
to the issuance of a grading permits) and if required by affected resource agencies, the project
proponent(s) shall obtain a Section 401 water quality certification from the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, a Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
a Section 1603 streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and
Game; (5) In compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code, if any
raptor nests are discovered prior to or concurrent with grading activities, the project
proponent(s) shall notify the City, contact the California Department of Fish and Game, and
shall comply with all appropriate procedures relative to grading operations in proximity to those
nests. Some of the resulting mitigation measures may include: (a) modifying the design of
utility poles, if any, for the protection of raptors and other birds; (b) restricting construction
activities near raptor nesting sites during and immediately following the breeding season;
and/or (c) constructing artificial nesting platforms for raptors and other birds; and (6) As part
of the replacement strategy authorized under the Oak Tree Ordinance, an oak tree mitigation
plan shall be submitted to the City of Diamond Bar which will mitigate for the loss of individual
South Pointe Master Plan 4-19
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
oak trees as well as the oak woodland habitat. In addition to satisfying the conditions set
forth in Part 16, Chapter 22.56 of Title 22 (,--;/arming and Zoning Code) of the Los Angeles
County Code, or similar ordinance enacted by the City prior to the commencement of grading
operations, the mitigation plan shall require the selective placement or planting of replacement
oak trees and typically associated vegetation in a characteristic oak woodland assemblage.
This aggregation of oak trees and associated plants will seek to establish a natural, viable plant
community in the area of that replacement, as opposed to the widespread or random
distribution of replacement trees at various locations throughout the project area.
Notwithstanding the nature of the development proposed (e.g., residential; commercial), the
impacts upon biological resources relate predominately to the removal of existing vegetation,
the reduction in on-site water resources, and the physical alteration of the project site as
required to accommodate that development. As a result, it is the grading activities rather the
ultimate land use which produce the greatest potential impact upon biological resources.
Based upon anticipated impacts to that watercourse located in Sandstone Canyon attributable
to VTT 32400, the Applicant is presently pursuing a Section 1603 (California Fish and Game
Code) streambed alteration agreement through the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG) and a Section 401 (federal Clean Water Act) water quality certification from the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Issuance of those permits and
approvals and the performance of all obligations specified therein will adequately compensate
for any potential impacts upon that watercourse and the riparian habitat areas associated
therewith.
With the cessation of processing of VTT 51407 by the District and the subsequent retention
of the majority of that area in its current state, less the physical impacts upon that area more
thoroughly described herein (e.g., access road; slope easement; borrow site; landslide
remediation), the number of oak trees potentially impacted by approved and pending projects
within the South Pointe Master Plan Project area will be significantly reduced below that level
(i.e., 768 specimen -sized trees) identified in the Final EIR.
Notwithstanding any subsequent actions by the City concerning VTT 52203, grading activities
conducted for VTT 32400 will impact that existing watercourse, riparian habitat, and oak tree
resources located within Sandstone Canyon. The issuance of the requisite Oak Tree Permit
and its associated mitigation plan, Section 401 water quality certification, Section 404 permit
(if applicable), and Section 1603 streambed alteration agreement, which will each be obtained
for VTT 32400, will negate the need for a separate permits for VTT 52203.
4.5.1 Approval of VTT 52203
The biological impacts associated with the development of VTT 32400 have been thoroughly
disclosed in the Final EIR. Since the area of VTT 52203 is included within that 48±
subdivision map area examined therein, the biological impacts attributable to VTT 52203 have
been previously addressed as part of the environmental analysis for VTT 32400 and will be
similar to those described in the Final EIR for that subdivision map area. However, since a
portion of the South Pointe Master Plan Project site (i.e., VTT 51407) will be retained in open
space for an indeterminable time period (pending any further intensification by the District),
the impacts upon areawide biological resources will be less than described in the Final EIR.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-20
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Grading activities undertaken to produce the building pads and street network for VTT 32400
will require the removal of the majority of existing vegetation now located in the northerly
portion of Sandstone Canyon. As a result of those grading activities required for the
development of VTT 32400, the existing vegetation within the boundaries of those grading
operations will be removed, new soil materials will be deposited and compacted thereupon,
and the resulting post -graded area will be maintained clear of any existing vegetation
(excluding any temporary landscaping installed by the Applicant to minimize soil erosion)
pending the installation of the proposed landscape improvements. Since the area of VTT
52203 will have been impacted by the grading conducted to create the two residual residential
parcels, no direct biological impacts are anticipated as a result of the development of that
residential subdivision.
Since no direct project -related biological impacts are anticipated (e.g., based upon prior site
disturbance), any biological impacts attributable to VTT 52203 relate only to the potential
cumulative effects associated with that project's relationship to VTT 32400. As indicated in
the Final EIR, implementation of VTT 32400 will necessitate the removal of approximately 333
specimen -sized oak trees. Although a number of mitigation measures were identified in the
Final EIR, including the provision of replacement trees pursuant to Part 16, Chapter 22.56 of
Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code, the Final EIR concluded that the loss of existing
biological resources within Sandstone Canyon would be cumulatively significant.
No additional environmental impact(s) beyond those described in the Final EIR have been
identified herein. In the absence of new identifiable environmental effects, no further
mitigation measures have been recommended as a result of this analysis.
4.5.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
All biological impacts associated with the development of the 48 t acre vesting tentative tract
were previously disclosed in the Final EIR. The proposed revisions to VTT 32400, as identified
in Section 3.2 (Revisions to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) herein, will neither result
in an increase in the area of site disturbance within Sandstone Canyon nor increase the
severity of those impacts previously disclosed for VTT 32400. Although the area of the
borrow site has been relocated from the area of the South Pointe Middle School to a new
location south of that facility, those biological resources which may have previously existed
upon that stockpile location have been previously impacted by the District's relocation of that
soil material. As a result, the disturbed borrow site does not include sensitive biological
resources which may be impacted by the use of that soil material as fill for VTT 32400.
In the absence of either new environmental impacts or an increase in the severity of those
impacts identified in the Final EIR, no further mitigation measures are recommended or required
under CEQA.
4.5.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
Since none of the revised Conditions identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted
Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32000) will produce a physical impact upon
the environment, the revision of these adopted conditions will not directly, indirectly or
cumulative impact those biological resources within and proximal to Sandstone Canyon.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-21
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Although "Condition D11" involves the relocation of two suitable oak trees from the project
site to a new location acceptable to the City, the elimination of that Condition will not
otherwise minimize the Applicant's obligations under Part 16, Chapter 22.56 of Title 22 of the
Los Angeles County Code (e.g., compensating resources shall be provided for each oak tree
impacted by project development). "Condition D 11 " was not included as a mitigation measure
in the Final EIR, but was subsequently imposed by the City Council following certification of
that EIR. Its elimination herein, therefore, will neither alter the findings of the Final EIR nor
increase the severity of any previously identified environmental effects.
In addition, the Applicant proposes the elimination of "Condition D21 " which would allow the
general public to remove select vegetation from the project site prior to the commencement
of grading operations. Insurance restrictions preclude the Applicant from authorizing
unrestricted access to the project site. Since "Condition D21 " was not included as a
mitigation measure in the Final EIR, its elimination will neither alter the findings of that
document nor increase the severity of those biological impacts identified therein.
4.6 Transportati)n/Cir :Ulation3l
Based upon the conclusions presented in the Final EIR, the City concluded that the build -out
of the South Pointe Master Plan would produce the following transportation and circulation
impact:
Ambient traffic growth anticipated to occur in the project vicinity, as modeled through the
year 2012, will result in Level of Service (LOS) forecasts of LOS E or LOS F during at least
one peak period at the following intersections: (1) Colima Road/Brea Canyon Cutoff; (2)
Colima Road/Lemon Avenue; (3) Colima Road/Eastbound SR -60 Ramps; (4) Brea Canyon
Road/Westbound SR -60 Ramps; (5) Brea Canyon Road/Colima Road; and (6) Pathfinder
Road/Northbound SR -57 Ramps (significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Based upon the environmental
analysis presented therein, the Final EIR concluded that the potential impacts upon the
areawide roadway network attributable to the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project
site could not be mitigated below a level of significance.
As indicated in the Final EIR, the projected build -out of the South Pointe Specific Plan Project
produced an estimated 13,320 new vehicle trips. Based upon the District's election to
terminate the further processing of VTT 51407, the potential traffic impacts associated with
the development of an additional 108 dwelling units and 24.7 t acres of commercial use will
no longer materialize.32 For the purpose of this traffic analysis, the square footage of all
31 Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.5 (Transportation/Circulation) in the Final EIR.
32 As indicated in the Final EIR, the trip generation projections for VTT 51407 were combined with
those associated with TT 51253. Based upon the City's subsequent approval of TT 51253 (21
residential dwelling units), vehicle trips associated with that approved tract will be added to the local
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR 4-22
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
commercial uses (290,000 square feet) is assumed to be evenly distributed through the 31
acres of commercial use proposed as part of the South Pointe Master Plan Project. In the
derivation of this square footage, a FAR of 0.21 (290,000 square feet/31 acres) has been
assumed. Although this projection differs from the FAR of 0.24 utilized elsewhere herein, the
resulting square footage allows for the presentation of a worst-case traffic analysis.33
As indicated in Final EIR, all commercial development activities proposed upon the South
Pointe MasterPlan Project area was determined to be approximately 11,270 average daily trips
(ADT). That figure is derived through the addition of the 8,910 average daily vehicle trips
associated with the master plan's Phase I commercial development (145,000 square feet), less
the 1,780 "pass -by" trips identified therein, plus 4,140 additional daily trips attributable to
Phase II commercial uses (145,000 square feet). Based upon this projection (which is
attributable to all commercial uses within the master plan area), the number of average daily
vehicle trips associated with the 58,935 square feet of commercial use assumed to exist
within VTT 32400 is derived by applying the ratio of assigned square footage to the ratio of
all square footage within the master plan area (58,935 square feet/290,000 square feet) and
then applying that same percentage (0.20) to the projected number of vehicle trips (11,270
average daily trips) attributable to all commercial development.
Assuming that only 58,935 square feet of commercial use was developed, representing the
estimated square footage of retail use which could be accommodated on the 6.3± site
assuming a FAR of 0.21, a projected 2,290 daily trips would result from a commercial use
upon the two residual parcels.34 In comparison, the occupancy of two dwelling units would
be anticipated to produce approximately 20 average daily vehicle trips.
Based upon both the elimination of commercial uses within VTT 32400 and the cessation of
subsequent processing of VTT 51407 by the District, the potential project -related traffic
impacts associated with the South Pointe Master Plan Project have been incrementally
reduced. However, as indicated in the Final EIR, traffic -related impacts result primarily from
the cumulative contribution of other "related projects" (i.e., defined as those projects
independent of those development activities comprising the South Pointe Master Plan Project).
Those related projects will continue to exist notwithstanding any previous or future actions
that the City may take upon those properties within the South Pointe Master Plan Project area.
Based upon the continuing presence of other related projects within the general project area,
the Final EIR concluded that cumulative traffic impacts would be significant, notwithstanding
the nature or intensity of development within the South Pointe Master Plan Project area.
roadway system. By eliminating VTT 51407 from the South Pointe Specific Plan, the then proposed
vehicle link between TT 51253 and Brea Canyon Road was removed from that master plan. In the
absence of that linkage, all traffic generated by TT 51253 will have minimal impacts upon Brea Canyon
Road. As a result, vehicle trips produced by that tract have not been included in this analysis.
33 Based upon this assumption, the 24.7± acres of commercial use external to the approved VTT
32400 would accommodate an estimated 231,065 square feet of nonresidential use. Conversely, an
estimated 58,935 square feet of retail use would be developed upon those commercial sites identified
in the Final EIR as part of the then proposed VTT 32400.
34 Op. Cit., Final EIR, Table 7, Traffic Generation Forecast, p. 4-73.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-23
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
In lieu of the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the City subsequently approved a variation of
one of the project alternatives evaluated in the Final EIR. Following certificationof the Final
EIR and prior to the approval of VTT 32400, the City adopted Findings as required under
CEQA. As indicated in the Findings, the following transportation and circulation impact was
identified based upon the implementation of Alternative No. 2, as revised:
• The alternative project, in combination with other development activities anticipated to
occur throughout the region, will result in a regional increase in traffic. That increase will
result in an exceedance of design capacities at a number of project area intersections.
Notwithstanding the implementation of the project or alternative project, cumulative traffic
impacts have been determined to be significant (significant).35
Based upon both the project -related and cumulative impacts associated with VTT 32400, the
following mitigation measures (as contained in the Final EIR) were adopted by the City for that
tract map: (1) The City has determined that a "fair share" contribution to the improvement of
the following intersections and street segments will substantially mitigate traffic -related
impacts and has adopted this obligation as a condition of alternative project approval: (a)
Colima Road/Golden Springs Drive/Brea Canyon Cutoff. Within the existing street width, stripe
a southbound, an eastbound and a westbound right -turn lane. This improvement will require
the elimination of street parking near the intersection on these three approaches; (b) Colima
Road/Lemon Avenue. Convert the existing southbound through lane on Lemon Avenue to a
through/left option lane to accommodate the heavy left -turn volume. The traffic signal and
striping shall be adequate to be operated with split phasing on the north and south approach;
(c) Colima Road/Eastbound SR -60 Ramps. Convert the eastbound Colima Road approach from
one left -turn lane, two through lanes and a right -turn lane to two left -turn lanes and two
through lanes; (d) Brea Canyon Road/Westbound SR -60 Ramps. Add a second northbound
left -turn lane within the existing right-of-way width. Add a third southbound through lane and
a southbound right -turn lane, plus a third lane on the Pomona (SR -60) Freeway off -ramp. The
additional lane on the off -ramp and the southbound right -turn lane will require street widening
(e) Brea Canyon Road/Colima Road/Golden Springs Drive. Stripe a northbound right -turn lane
within the existing street width. Add a second southbound left -turn lane and convert the
existing eastbound right -turn lane to an eastbound through/right option lane; (f) Brea Canyon
Road. Construct full -width street improvements to the section as approved by the City; (g)
Pathfinder Road/Brea Canyon Road. Install a traffic signal as a
Pathfinder Road/Southbound SR -57 Ramps. A second eastbound throughdlane is the
required(o)
accommodate background year 1997 traffic volumes at the Pathfinder Road/northbound SR -57
ramps. The Pathfinder Road/SR-57 Freeway overcrossing is expected to be widened to four
lanes prior to 1997; and (i) Pathfinder Road/Northbound SR -57 Ramps. A second through lane
is required in both directions on Pathfinder Road at the northbound SR -57 ramps; (2)
Concurrent with the development of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400, and prior to the
issuance of an occupancy permit for any of the residential units contained therein, the project
proponent(s) shall improve Brea Canyon Road to the planned four -lane cross-section of that
35 The above referenced impact is excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400. The "alternative project" referenced therein relates, in part,
to VTT 32400, as conditionally approved by the City Council on October 18, 1994. The "project"
referenced herein relates to the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project.
South P
orate Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR 4-24
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
roadway along the length of that subdivision map area; (3) A left -turn lane shall be provided
at the proposed point of vehicular ingress and egress along Brea Canyon Road. That access
Point shall be designed to ensure adequate sight distances along that roadway; street grades
and landscape improvements adjacent thereto shall be evaluated by the City of Diamond Bar
and, if required, modified to avoid interference of safe line -of -sight distances; (4) Prior to the
approval of the final vesting map, the project proponent(s) shall submit and the City of
Diamond Bar shall review and consider a traffic signal warrant to determine whether a traffic
signal is required at that access point. If deemed warranted by the City, based upon the
findings of that traffic analysis, the project proponent(s) shall either construct or advance the
funds to construct an operable traffic signal of the type and in a time frame as determined
appropriate by the City.
Since commercial development activities (as assumed in the Final EIR) generate a greater
number of vehicle trips that corresponding residential development, the elimination of the
commercial use from the analysis presented in the Final EIR and the substitution of a
residential use thereupon will result in a reduction in the project's "fair share" contribution to
each of the identified traffic improvements.
4.6.1 Approval of VTT 52203
Vehicular access to VTT 52203 will be obtained through a reconfiguration and extension of
the easterly and westerly local streets internal to VTT 32400. As indicated therein, Street "A"
and Street "C" (as indicated in VTT 32400) will be extended southward and will cul-de-sac
prior to connection with Street "D" (as indicated in VTT 32400). Those streets will provide
double -loaded access to the 16 residential lots proposed in VTT 52203. Since vehicular
access to the new tract can only be obtained through VTT 32400, the street system within
VTT 52203 (like than in VTT 32400) will be retained as private streets with restricted access
limited by gated entries provided at both the northeastern accessway and southerly access
road servicing VTT 32400.
Although the roadway network internal to VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 will be retained as
private streets, the design of those roadways shall conform to the City's "residential" street
standards. Referencing the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, "local residential streets are
designed to serve adjacent residential land uses only. They allow access to residential
driveways and often provide parking for the neighborhood. They are not intended to serve
through traffic traveling from one street to another, but solely local traffic."36 As indicated in
the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, the right-of-way width for a "residential" street is
established as between 44-60 feet.37 The proposed street system will conform with the City's
established street standards.
In comparing the residential development of the two residual parcels in lieu of a potential retail
use as described in the Final EIR, the number of vehicle trips generated from those parcels is
significantly reduced below the assumptions presented therein. In contrast to the 2,290 ADT
36 OP. Cit., City of Diamond Bar General Plan, Circulation Element, p. V-5.
37 Ibid., Table V-1, City of Diamond Bar Roadway Classification, P. V-6.
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR 4-25
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
generated by the approved commercial development within VTT 32400, the construction of
16 dwelling units upon that same site will produce only 168 new vehicle trips. This projection,
however, exceeds the number of average daily vehicle trips generated by the two residential
units (i.e., approximately 20 ADT) presently authorized upon those residual residential parcels;
producing a net increase of approximately 148 ADT above that level approved by the City.
Similarly, based upon the elimination of the 108 residential units (1,110 average daily trips)
within VTT 51407 and all commercial uses from the master plan area (11,270 average daily
trips), only about 940 average daily vehicle trips are anticipated based upon the development
of VTT 32400 (assuming no development upon the residual residential parcels).38 As a result,
implementation of VTT 32400 (940 trips) and VTT 52203 (168 trips) will generate an
estimated 1,108 average daily vehicle trips as compared to the 13,320 trips identified in the
Final EIR for the South Pointe Master Plan Project.
Since no new environmental effects have been identified herein, no additional mitigation
measures are recommended or deemed necessary to address project -specific contributions to
that system.
4.6.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
As proposed, a number of traffic -related revisions have been proposed to VTT 32400. Those
revisions include: (1) retention of the roads internal to VTT 32400 as private streets; (2)
redesigned of the project's entryways to provide for gated entry and to offer adequate turn-
around for motorists; and (3) reconfiguration of certain streets to provide vehicular access to
VTT 52203.
All streets internal to the project are classified as "local residential streets" in accordance with
the standards contained in the Circulation Element of the City of Diamond Bar General Plan.
As indicated therein, "local residential streets include those streets predominately residential
in terms of adjacent property use, and are intended to retain a residential character. They are
typically not designated in the General Plan Circulation Element.""
The Applicant seeks to retain all streets internal to the project as private streets, rather to
publicly dedicate those streets from public use. The City of Diamond Bar presently has a
number of existing gated residential communities wherein broad public access is restricted.
Although no formal general plan policies have been formulated to address private streets,
private streets are authorized under Section 21.28.060 of Title 21 (Subdivisions) of the Los
Angeles County Code, adopted by the City as the City's Subdivision Ordinance. As indicated
therein:
With the approval of the advisory agency, any road which is intended to be kept
physically closed to public travel or posted as a private street at all times may be
38 op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan Project, Table 7,
Traffic Generation Forecast, p. 4-73.
39 Op. Cit., City of Diamond Bar General Plan, Circulation Element, p. V-5.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-26
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
shown as a private street; but in any such case, the final map may lie accompanied by
a conditional offer of dedication, or the map may be accompanied by a conditional offer
of dedication by separate instrument, either of which may be accepted by the board of
supervisors... The design and improvement of any such private street shall be subject
to all of the requirements prescribed by this Title 21 for public streets.
As indicated in Exhibit (Amended Land Use Plan Overlay), a restricted access gate has been
included at both the site's northeasterly entrance onto Brea Canyon Road at Street "A" (as
indicated in VTT 32400) and at the project's southerly entrance at Street "D" (as indicated in
VTT 32400). At each access point, a cul-de-sac is provided to accommodate turnaround
movement. As illustrated, the distance between the public right-of-way and the center of the
cul-de-sac for Street "A" is approximately 125 feet. For Street "D," intersecting with Brea
Canyon Road, that distance increases to approximately 155 feet.
Based upon the trip generation assumptions presented in the Final EIR, including both VTT
32400 and VTT 52203, it is estimated that up to 115 inbound trips may occur during the PM
peak hour. Assuming that these trips are equally distributed between both entrances, up to
58 vehicles may enter through the gates during that peak hour. If a security gate is installed
at each roadway, the delay to incoming traffic would depend on the type of devise (e.g., card
key or other devise) and the location (e.g., convenience) of its installation. Assuming that
each arriving vehicle takes up to ten seconds to clear the gate, there is a reasonably low
probability that more than two vehicles will be queuing before the gate at any one time. Since
the gate is set back from the public right-of-way by a minimum of 125 feet, that setback
would be adequate to accommodate traffic queuing associated with up to six vehicles while
providing adequate clearance for through traffic. No traffic -related conflicts are, therefore,
created or anticipated by the conversion of the project's internal roadway network from public
to private streets.
In order to provide vehicular access to VTT 52203, a number of local streets internal to VTT
32400 will be extended southward. In redesigning the internal roadway network, the location
of certain residential lots has been shifted based upon those design revisions.
As indicated in the Circulation Element of the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, it is the
objective of the City to "maintain the integrity of residential neighborhoods" and to
"discourage through traffic. 1140 In response to this objective, the City has formulated the
following implementation strategy: "Prevent the creation of new roadway connections which
adversely impact existing neighborhoods. ,41
As further indicated in the approved vesting tentative map, a secondary access road has been
proposed southerly of VTT 32400, connecting the subdivision map area with Brea Canyon
Road. As approved, that access road (which is located partly upon the area of VTT 32400 and
partly upon the District's property southerly of that tract) would extend beyond the tract's
westerly boundary and provide direct vehicular access to the South Pointe Middle School.
40 /bid., Objective 1.3, P. V-24.
47 /bid., Strategy 1.3.1, p. V-24.
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR 4-27
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Since the District has neither formulated final design plans for that roadway nor imposed a
prohibition concerning the future linkage of this roadway with Larkstone Drive, vehicles
traveling along this roadway may be able to access that existing residential area located
westerly of that school site. Although that connection is not now intended by the District,
motorists may be able to maneuver through the facility's parking area and travel beyond the
school site. While this connection could offer the existing residential area improved emergency
and non -emergency access, unless otherwise restricted, it may further serve as a localized by-
pass allowing motorists to avoid the intersection of Colima Road/Golden Springs Drive and
Brea Canyon Road. Should traffic volumes along affected roadways (e.g., Larkstone Drive;
Black Hawk Drive; Willow Bud Drive; Lemon Avenue) increase to include a significant number
of pass -by trips, additional safety issues may arise affecting both South Pointe Middle School
students and residents of that established residential area located westerly of that school site.
In order to control through traffic between this roadway and Larkstone Drive, the District is
considering the installation of strategically located removal barricades. Those barricades will
preclude non -emergency access between the southerly access road and Larkstone Drive. In
the event that additional egress from the existing residential area is required, such as in
response to an emergency situation, the barricades can be temporarily removed by either
District or other public safety personnel.
Based upon the above analysis, no new traffic/circulation issues have been identified.
Additionally, none of the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 increase the severity of the
environmental impacts described in the Final EIR. In the absence of those effects, no further
mitigation measures are recommended or required under CEQA.
4.6.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
With the exception of "MRMP 31 " (i.e., police surveillance), "MRMP 32" (i.e., security
features) and "MRMP 52" (i.e., County regional trail system), none of the Conditions identified
in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400)
relate to transportation or circulation issues. As a result, except as otherwise described below,
those proposed revisions will neither alter the topical analysis presented in the Final EIR nor
necessitate the introduction of additional mitigation measures herein.
Both "MRMP 31 " and "MRMP 32" were initially included in the Final EIR based upon the then
proposed inclusion of a commercial component as part of the South Pointe Master Plan Project
and based upon the public dedication of all street segments. As revised, only residential land
uses are included as part of the project and access to all residential uses will be controlled
through restricted access gates. Based upon these revisions to the approved tentative tract,
the project will neither significantly affect existing police services nor impose a demand for
new services, facilities, or personnel. Compliance with applicable design and development
standards, as imposed by the City, will ensure adequate access, safety, and surveillance
opportunities by local law enforcement personnel.
"MRMP 52" was included in the Final EIR based upon the potential inclusion of the South
Pointe Master Plan Project site as part of the County's master plan of trails. Based upon the
City's subsequent adoption of a comprehensive general plan and the absence of a trail link
South Pointe Master Plan 4.28
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
upon that site, the above referenced mitigation measure is no longer applicable to the pending
project.
In the absence of either new identifiable environmental effects or an increase in the severity
of those environmental effects presented in the Final EIR, no additional mitigation measures
have been recommended by the City or are required under CEQA.
4.7 Air Quality"
As indicated in the Final EIR, the following air quality impact was identified based upon the
build -out assumptions for the South Pointe Master Plan Project:
• During construction operations, projected nitrogen oxide emissions are anticipated to
exceed established criteria for significance. Long-term emissions for both carbon monoxide
and nitrogen oxides are projected to exceed SCAQMD [South Coast Air Quality
Management District] NSR [New Source Review] threshold values (significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Notwithstanding the
implementation of all feasible mitigation measures identified therein, air quality impacts
attributable to both the South Pointe Master Plan Project and cumulative development
activities identified in that Final EIR, were judged to be significant.
Following certification of the Final EIR and prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400, the City
adopted specific findings addressing each of the potential environmental impacts identified in
the Final EIR for Alternative No. 2, as revised. As indicated therein, the following
environmental impact was identified based upon the implementation of that alternative project:
• The alternative project, in combination with other development activities anticipated to
occur throughout the region, will result in a regional increase in traffic and a corresponding
increase in air quality emissions. Based upon the existing non -attainment status of the
South Coast Air Basin, and threshold criteria established by the SCAQMD, the resulting
cumulative air quality impact is anticipated to be significant (significant)."
Based upon the impacts identified in the Final EIR, the following mitigation measures were
adopted by the City and govern the construction term of the project: (1) During construction
activities, the project proponent(s) shall apply approved chemical soil stabilizers, according to
manufacturers' specifications, to all inactive construction areas (i.e., previously graded areas
inactive for four days or more); (2) During construction activities, the project proponent(s) shall
42 Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.6 (Air Quality) in the Final EIR.
43 The above referenced impact is excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which
included both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City
prior to the City's approval of VTT 32400. The "alternative project" referenced therein relates, in part,
to VTT 32400, as conditionally approved by the City Council on October 18, 1994.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-29
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
suspend all excavating and grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts)
exceed 25 miles -per -hour (mph); (3) During construction activities, the project proponent(s)
shall sweep streets at the end of each work day if any visible soil material is carried over to
adjacent thoroughfares. The SCAQMD recommend the use of water sweepers which use
reclaimed water; (4) During construction activities, the project proponent(s) shall apply water
or chemical soil stabilizers, according to manufacturers' specifications, twice daily to all
unpaved parking or staging areas and unpaved road surfaces, if required for dust control; (5)
During construction activities, the project proponent(s) shall provide temporary traffic control
during all phases of construction activities to improve traffic flow such as providing a flag
person to direct traffic and ensure safe movements off the site as directed by the City
Engineer, of the City of Diamond Bar; (6) During construction activities, the project
proponent(s) shall apply washers where vehicles exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash
off trucks and any equipment leaving the site every trip in designated areas of the site; (7)
During construction activities, the project proponent(s) shall maintain traffic speeds on all
unpaved road surfaces to 15 mph or less; and (8) All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other
loose materials are to be covered and shall maintain at least six inches of freeboard (i.e.,
minimum required space between top of the load and top of the trailer) based upon a level
load.
The City has further determined that the following mitigation measures, as contained in the
Final EIR, were applicable to the operational phase of the project: (1) To the maximum extent
feasible, use built-in energy efficient appliances; (2) To the maximum extent feasible, use
energy efficient and automated controls for air conditioners; and (3) To the maximum extent
feasible, use double -glass paned windows.
Based upon the subsequent elimination of specific aspects of the South Pointe Master Plan
Project, the projected emissions attributable to all development activities now anticipated in
that planning area will be significantly less than projected in the Final EIR. However, should
a commercial use be developed upon those residual parcels within VTT 32400, the long-term
(operational) impacts associated with mobile source emissions generated by that use would
exceed SCAQMD threshold values for significance.44 Since all related project activities (as
described in the Final EIR) are assumed to be implemented, cumulative air quality impacts will
continue to occur at generally the same level as identified therein.
4.7.1 Approval of VTT 52203
The introduction of 16 residential units within VTT 52203 will result in the generation of an
estimated 168 new two-way average daily vehicle trips, representing a net increase of
approximately 148 ADT upon that tract map area. Assuming the same trip length and
44 Following the preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master
Plan (November 1992), the South Coast Air Quality Management District prepared and adopted a
revised handbook for assessing air quality impacts. That document, entitled CEQA Air Quality
Handbook (SCAQMD, April 1993), imposes a slightly different methodology for the quantification of
project -related emissions. For internal consistency, the methodology contained in the Air Quality
Handbook for Preparing Environmental Impact Reports (SCAQMD, 1987) has been utilized herein.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-30
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
characteristics as identified in the Final EIR,45 the following daily criteria emissions are
estimated based upon a net increase of 14 dwelling units thereupon: (1) Carbon Monoxide -
6.7 pounds/day; (2) Reactive Hydrocarbons - 0.6 pounds/day; (3) Nitrogen Oxides - 3.4
pounds/day; (4) Particulates - 0.77 pounds/da y.46
Assuming the elimination of both the 108 residential units associated with VTT 51407 and all
commercial uses upon the areas of the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the 93 units
authorized upon VTT 32400 would generate an estimated 960 average daily vehicle trips.
Based upon the implementation of VTT 32400, short-term (construction) impact have been
determined to remain significant for that tract map area. However, long-term (operational)
impacts for VTT 32400 would be reduced below a level of significance.
Implementation of the 93 units within VTT 32400, in combination with the net increase of 14
units within VTT 52203, will generate an estimated 1,108 vehicle trips. Assuming 1,108
average daily trips, estimated motor vehicle emissions generated by VTT 32400 and VTT
52203 will produce the following mobile source emission estimates: (1) Carbon Monoxide -
49.8 pounds/day; (2) Reactive Hydrocarbons - 4.7 pounds/day; (3) Nitrogen Oxides - 25.1
pounds/day; and (4) Particulates - 5.8 pounds/day.47
45 As indicated in the Final EIR, mobile source emissions constitute the primary contributor to all
project -related air pollutants. The analysis presented therein was based upon an estimated 13,320
daily vehicle trips, an average of 8.8 miles per trip, and a total projection of 117,216 vehicle miles
traveled per day.
46 The above projections are based upon the assumptions presented in Table 19, Estimated Motor
Vehicle Emissions at Build -Out, in the Final EIR (p. 4-121). In the derivation of these estimates, the
ratio between the revised 048 ADT) and the previously identified vehicle trips (13,320 ADT) was
applied to the total quantity of estimated emissions as identified in the Final EIR. Not included in the
above projections are the estimated stationary source emissions, defined as those produced through
the on-site use of natural gas and the off-site generation of electricity. Although the stationary source
emissions presented in Table 20, Total Daily Build -Out Emissions, in the Final EIR (p. 4-122) reflect the
build -out of the entire South Pointe Master Plan Project and although those emission projections would
be substantially reduced based upon the approved land uses within that planning area, the inclusion
of those estimates herein (i.e., Carbon Monoxide - 3.9 pounds/day; Reactive Hydrocarbons - 0.5
pounds/day; Nitrogen Oxides - 23.2 pounds/day; Sulfur Oxides - 1.5 pounds/day; and Particulates - 0.5
pounds/day) do not result in the generation of significant long-term (operational) air quality impacts
attributable to the implementation of VTT 52203.
47 The above projections are based upon the assumptions presented in Table 19, Estimated Motor
Vehicle Emissions at Build -Out, in the Final EIR (p. 4-121). By combining the above emission estimates
with those stationary source pollutants identified in the Final EIR (i.e., Carbon Monoxide - 3.9
pounds/day; Reactive Hydrocarbons - 0.5 pounds/day; Nitrogen Oxides - 23.2 pounds/day; Sulfur
Oxides - 1.5 pounds/day; and Particulates - 0.5 pounds/day), a worst-case projection is derived since
actual stationary source emissions would be less than those quantities presented therein. Total
projected emissions for both VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 are, therefore, estimated to be: (1) Carbon
Monoxide - 53.7 pounds/day; (2) Reactive Hydrocarbons - 5.2 pounds/day; (3) Nitrogen Oxides - 48.3
pounds/day; (4) Sulfur Oxides - 1.5 pounds/day; and (5) Particulates - 6.3 pounds/day. Based upon
SCAQMD threshold criteria, none of these emission estimates are deemed significant.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-31
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Based upon these emission projections, the combined development of VTT 32400 and VTT
52203 will not produce a significant long-term (operational) air quality impact. Similarly,
although the further intensification of residential uses upon those residual parcels (i.e., net
increase of 14 units) will incrementally increase the quantity of operational (e.g., mobile
source) emissions above that level now projected for the authorized residential development
thereupon, implementation of VTT 52203 will not result in a significant long-term (operational)
air quality impact.
When comparing the residential development of the residual parcels verse the retail
development of those parcels, 58,935 square feet of commercial development would generate
an estimated 2,290 new daily trips while 16 new residential units would generate only an
estimated 168 average daily vehicle trips. Based upon the number of average daily trips
associated with both land uses, it is evident that the introduction of a residential land use will
produce significantly fewer air pollutants than the comparable development of a commercial
use upon that same site.
Since the quantity of air emissions would be reduced under this scenario and since no new air
quality impacts have been identified herein, the City has determined that no further mitigation
measures are deemed warranted.
4.7.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Since the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 will not result in a change in the number of
residential units authorized thereupon and since the grading plan for the revised map will not
differ substantially from that previously approved by the City, the short-term (construction) and
long-term (operational) air quality impacts associated with the revised subdivision will be
similar to those emissions generated by the approved vesting tentative map.
Based upon the above analysis, it is concluded that certain air quality impacts, as disclosed
in the previous environmental analysis, will be reduced below those levels disclosed therein.
Since no additional impacts have been identified and since none of the impacts identified in
the Final EIR will be increased above the level identified therein, no further mitigation measures
are recommended or required under CEQA and Guidelines.
4.7.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
None of the revised Conditions will generate physical impacts which have the potential to
increase or decrease the rate, quantity, or characteristics of air pollutants generated by the
proposed project. In the absence of additional identifiable environmental effects, no additional
mitigation measures have been recommended.
4.8 Noise
Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.7 (Noise) in the Final EIR. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR for the
build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the following noise -related impact was
identified therein:
South Pointe Master Plan 4-32
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Based upon the site's proximity to both the Orange (SR -57) Freeway and Brea Canyon
Road, residential and commercial land uses proposed in the vicinity of those roadways may
be exposed to noise levels in exceedance of adopted municipal guidelines (less -than -
significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. Based upon the environmental
analysis presented therein, the Final EIR concluded that the potential on-site and off-site noise
impacts associated with the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project site could not
be mitigated below a level of significance.
As indicated in the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, different noise standards have been
established for both commercial and residential land uses. As indicated therein, residential
units are considered more sensitive to external noise impacts and are, therefore, held to a
higher standard that commercial and industrial activities.
As indicated in the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, noise levels between 65 and 70 dBA
CNEL are considered "conditionally acceptable" for commercial areas. As indicated in the Final
EIR, projected (2002) noise levels in the vicinity of the commercial site were estimated to be
64.8 dBA CNEL." Based upon those earlier findings, no noise impacts upon the then proposed
commercial development upon the two residual parcels were identified. However, in contrast
to the above nonresidential noise standards, for single-family residential uses, the
"conditionally acceptable" range is reduced to between 55 and 65 dBA CNEL.49 Since the
modeled noise level (i.e., 64.8 dBA CNEL) is relatively close to the threshold limit established
for residential use (i.e., 65 dBA CNEL), more site specific analysis would be required to assess
the presence of potential noise impacts upon those residential uses presently authorized upon
those residual residential sites.
As required under the City of Diamond Bar General Plan, "within identified 65 dB CNEL noise
contours, require that site-specific noise studies be prepared to verify site-specific noise
conditions and to ensure that noise considerations are included in project review" and "within
identified 65 dB CNEL noise corridors, ensure that necessary reduction measures are applied
to meet adopted interior and exterior noise standards."50 A similar recommended mitigation
measure was included in the Final EIR.
Following certification of the Final EIR, the City adopted Findings addressing the potential
environmental impacts associated with the implementation of VTT 32400. As indicated
therein, the following noise -related impact was identified based upon the implementation of
Alternative No. 2, as revised:
48 Op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan, Table 30,
Comparison between Existing (1992) and Future (2002) Noise Levels, p. 4-146.
49 Op. Cit., City of Diamond Bar General Plan, Public Health and Safety Element, Table IV -1, Noise
Standards, p. IV -15.
50 Ibid., Strategies 1.10.1 and 1.10.2, p. IV -13.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-33
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
• Based upon the site's proximity to both the Orange (SR -57) Freeway and Brea Canyon
Road, residential and commercial land uses proposed in the vicinity of those roadways may
be exposed to noise levels in exceedance of adopted municipal guidelines (less -than -
significant).
Upon approving VTT 32400, the City adopted the following mitigation measures (as contained
in the Final EIR): (1) To minimize noise levels in the vicinity of the SR -57 Freeway, as perceived
by those future residential receptors which will occupy dwelling units in proximity to that
roadway, the design of those residential units which have frontage along Brea Canyon Road
or which, in the absence of an adjoining slope easement, would abut that roadway, shall
include additional noise attenuation to a degree sufficient to ensure that the exterior areas of
said units conform to the City of Diamond Bar's exterior residential standards. Noise
attenuating design options include, but are not limited to, the construction of a noise barrier
of a minimum height of eight (8) feet, as measured from the pad elevation of the corresponding
lot upon which the noise barrier is constructed. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit
for any of the dwelling units which are so situated, the project proponent(s) shall submit, and
the City shall review and consider, the findings of an acoustical analysis demonstrating
compliance with applicable municipal noise standards; (2) Excavation, grading and other
construction activities shall be restricted to hours between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Monday
through Friday and between 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Saturday. No construction activities
shall be authorized to occur on Sundays, unless otherwise approved by the City of Diamond
Bar; (3) Construction and maintenance activities, including the repair and maintenance of
equipment, shall conform to and comply with applicable provisions of the City of Diamond Bar;
and (4) When feasible, construction equipment shall be stored on-site to eliminate and/or
reduce heavy -equipment truck trips.
4.8.1 Approval of VTT 52203
As indicated in the Final EIR, the only identifiable noise impact attributable to either the build-
out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project or Alternative 2, as revised (i.e., VTT 32400)
related to the site's proximity to an existing noise source (i.e., Brea Canyon Road; SR -57
Freeway). Based upon the site's location, certain residential lots located proximal to Brea
Canyon Road may experience noise levels in exceedance of established municipal standards.
For single-family residential areas, noise levels between 65 and 75 dBA CNEL are considered
"normally unacceptable." As discussed in the Final EIR, implementation of VTT 32400 will
introduce residential uses into an area demonstrated to contain ambient noise levels which are
defined by the City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan as "normally unacceptable" for a residential
use. However, as conditionally approved by the City, only a limited number of residential units
within VTT 32400 have the potential to be subjected to noise levels in exceedance of adopted
City standards.
Should VTT 52203 be implemented as proposed, the number of residential units potentially
subjected to high noise levels may increase above that number identified in the Final EIR.51
5' As identified in the Final EIR, nine residential lots (i.e., Lot Nos. 34 through 42 of VTT 32400)
were demonstrated to experience exterior noise levels above City standards prior to any attenuation
South Pointe Master Plan 4-34
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
As a result, unless effectively mitigated, the implementation of VTT 52203 may expose
additional on-site residents to high noise levels.
As defined in the City of Diamond Bar Genera/ Plan, for those areas experiencing "normally
unacceptable" noise levels, "new construction or development should generally be
discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise
reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in
design."52 Based upon the proximity of VTT 32400 to the SR -57 Freeway, the City adopted
the following mitigation measures for that vesting tentative tract:
To minimize noise levels in the vicinity of the SR -57 Freeway, as perceived by those
future residential receptors which will occupy dwelling units in proximity to that
roadway, the design of those residential units which have frontage along Brea Canyon
Road or which, in the absence of an adjoining slope easement, would abut that
roadway, shall include additional noise attenuation to a degree sufficient to ensure that
the exterior areas of said units conform to the City of Diamond Bar's exterior residential
standards. Noise attenuation design options include, but are not limited to, the
construction of a noise barrier of a minimum height of eight (8) feet, as measured from
the pad elevation of the corresponding lot upon which the noise barrier is constructed.
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any of the dwelling units which are so
situated, the project proponent(s) shall submit, and the City shall review and consider,
the findings of an acoustical analysis demonstrating compliance with applicable
municipal noise standards.53
In compliance with the above referenced mitigation, adopted as project Conditions and
applicable to both VTT 32400 and VTT 52203, the Applicant will be required to submit a
further analysis of those noise attenuating strategies which will be included in project design.
Since the above mitigation measure applies equally to VTT 52203 and since that measure is
adequate to ensure that the resulting units fully address the existing noise environment, no
further mitigation measures are recommended herein.
4.8.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Although the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 will not result in an increase in the number of
units to be developed within that subdivision map area, the revised circulation system will
impact the number and orientation of select units located in proximity to Brea Canyon Road
and the SR -57 Freeway. By increasing the number of units which are located in proximity to
(e.g., noise barrier). The placement of an additional residential unit upon Lot No. 91 could result in one
additional unit being subjected to noise levels above those standards. The introduction of additional
residential units upon the easterly of the two residual residential lots approved as part of that vesting
tentative tract map and the reorientation of select lots thereupon could increase the number of units
which may be adversely affected by traffic -related noise along the SR -57 Freeway.
52 /bid.
53 Op. Cit., City Council Resolution No. 94-48.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-35
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
those roadways, a revised noise attenuation plan may be required for select residential units.
As demonstrated in the Final EIR, based upon an assessment of those residential lots located
in closest proximity to the SR -57 Freeway, feasible mitigation measures (e.g., 8 -foot acoustical
wall) exist which effectively mitigate exterior noise levels upon affected properties to within
established City standards. Since no residential unit will be located closer to that roadway
than assumed in the Final EIR, the acoustical analysis presented therein accurately describes
the pre- and post -project noise environment upon VTT 32400, as revised.
Based upon those mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR and adopted as Conditions,
the Applicant will be required to submit a further analysis of those noise attenuating strategies
which will be included in project design. Since those mitigation measures are adequate to
ensure that the resulting units fully address the existing noise environment, no further
mitigation measures are recommended herein.
4.8.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
None of the revised Conditions presented in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) will produce physical impacts that have the
potential to impact either the ambient noise environment or the project's response to that
environment. As a result, no additional mitigation measures are deemed necessary based upon
those requested revisions.
4.9 public Services and Facilities 54
Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR, the following environmental impacts
associated with the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan Project have been identified:
• Police Protection. Project implementation will result in the introduction of additional project
area residents and employees onto the project site, including the introduction of both
residential and non-residential land uses. These actions will increase existing demands
upon police services within the project boundaries (less -than -significant).
• Fire Protection. Although project development has the potential to reduce existing wildland
fire hazards now evident on-site, the introduction of new residents, employees and
property improvements will increase demands upon fire protection and paramedic services
(less -than -significant).
• Sanitary Sewers. Project development will result in the generation of an estimated
145,730 gallons of wastewater daily (less -than -significant).
• Solid Waste. Upon occupancy, project implementation will result in the generation of an
estimated 4.68 tons of solid waste per day (less -than -significant).
54 Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.8 (Public Services and Facilities) in the Final EIR.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-36
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
• Parks and Recreation. Project development will increase existing demands upon areawide
recreational resources, producing a demand for approximately 2.04 acres of local park
lands. The proposed development of a 20± acre park on-site will result in the expansion
of Citywide recreational amenities and reduce identified park deficiencies (less -than -
significant).
Educational Facilities. Although project development will directly result in the introduction
of an estimated 153 new students into area schools, existing student capacities and/or
proposed facility expansion plans indicate that areawide schools can accommodate those
students resulting from the proposed project. Additionally, project development will
facilitate the expansion of the existing South Pointe Middle School through the elimination
of existing physical constraints to that expansion (less -than -significant).
Since the South Pointe Master Plan Project was not subsequently approved by the City no
mitigation measures were formally adopted by the City for that project; however, a number
of mitigation measures were recommended in the Final EIR. As indicated in the Final EIR,
based upon the measures identified therein, each of the above referenced environmental
impacts (associated with the build -out of the South Pointe Master Plan), could be effectively
mitigated below a level of significance.
Relative to police protection, the elimination of all commercial uses within the boundaries of
VTT 32400 (as evaluated in the Final EIR) and the substitute of those nonresidential uses for
residential development activities is considered to have a beneficial impact upon law
enforcement facilities and personnel. Unlike residential uses, which base personnel demands
upon the resident population, no direct relationship exists between expanded nonresidential
land uses and police department staffing. Although commercial uses may introduce a
significant number of shoppers and employees to a single site at any one time, typically police
protection services are not increased in direct proportion to that transient population.
In addition, residential uses generally have a lower incidence rate of reported criminal activities
than do commercial development projects. As traffic volumes are reduced (through the
elimination of commercial uses and the substitution of residential uses), the potential for
automobile accidents also diminishes. The introduction of on-site security personnel, in
combination with restricted public access, will result in minimum project -related demands upon
the County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department.
Under the South Pointe Master Plan Project, the majority of that site would be converted to
an urban use. Based upon that site intensification, the existing brush and wildland fire hazards
associated with open space and woodland areas would be diminished. Since much of the
South Pointe Master Plan Project area has been retained in open space, those potential hazards
exist to a greater degree than if the entire site was subsequently developed. Implementation
of a fuel modification program by the Applicant and subsequent maintenance by the
homeowners' association will, however, reduce that impact below a level of significance.
As discussed in the Final EIR, commercial land uses were assumed to exist adjacent to
residential areas. Based upon differences in the operational characteristics of those land uses
(e.g., traffic generation; density; nature of on-site uses), land use conflicts could surface which
result in greater demands upon police, fire, and paramedic services. By eliminating those
South Pointe Master Plan 4-37
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
potential conflicts (i.e., development of a homogeneous residential community), impacts upon
area service providers should also be reduced.
Based upon the wastewater generation rates presented in the Final EIR,55 the two residential
units now authorized upon the residual residential parcels within VTT 32400 are projected to
produce only 520 gallons of wastewater per day. In contrast, 65,850 square feet of
commercial use would generate an estimated 21,400 gallons during that same period. By
reducing the amount of sanitary sewage requiring treatment at a County facility, cumulative
demands requiring the expansion of that facility would be incrementally reduced.
Similarly, as reflected in the Final EIR,56 two residential units are projected to produce about
47 pounds of solid waste per day. Should a 65,850 square foot commercial development
proceed on that same site, more than 1.053 pounds of solid waste would require collection
and off-site disposal. By diminishing the amount of solid waste generated from a development
activity, impacts upon local landfills are incrementally reduced.
Since commercial development projects are not required to pay park dedication (Quimby Act)
fees, retail activities do not further the City's objective to expand locally available recreational
opportunities. In contrast, in lieu fees collected through residential subdivision activities will
contribute to the inventory of those public resources available for park projects. Since the
amount of fees collected by the City are based upon the demands produced by those
residential projects, the payment of park fees adequately mitigates the corresponding increase
in demand upon and for those public amenities.
As authorized under Assembly Bill 2426, the Walnut Valley Unified School District collects
school fees for both residential and commercial development. As with Quimby Act fees, the
fee structure established by the District is intended to reflect the demands upon education
facilities produced by those different land uses. The payment of established fees is considered
adequate mitigation for the impacts generated by those activities.
As indicated above, development of a two residential units upon the residual residential
parcels, rather than the commercial use assumed in the Final EIR, will decrease project -related
demands upon public services and facilities.
Following certification of the Final EIR and prior to the conditional approval of VTT 32400, the
City adopted specific environmental findings as required under CEQA and Guidelines. As
indicated in the Findings, the following impacts upon public services and facilities were
identified based upon the implementation of Alternative No. 2, as revised:
• Police Protection. Project implementation will result in the introduction of additional project
area residents and employees onto the project site, including the introduction of both
ss Op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report South Pointe Master Plan, Table 32, Estimated
Wastewater Generation, p. 4-169.
ss Ibid., Table 34, Estimated Solid Waste Generation, p. 4-176.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-38
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
residential and non-residential land uses. These actions will increase existing demands
upon police services within the project boundaries (less -than -sign ificant).57
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon that identified environmental impact, the
following mitigation measures (as contained in the Final EIR) were adopted by the City: (1)
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department shall
be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon building plans: (a) to facilitate
emergency access; (b) to assure the consideration of design strategies which facilitate
public safety and police surveillance; and (c) to offer design recommendations to reduce
potential demands upon police services; (2) Security features which shall be incorporated
into the final design may include: (a) residential dwelling unit orientation which facilities
"neighborhood involvement" activities; (b) exterior security lighting; (c) well-designed
access for police patrols to provide optimum observations; and (d) illuminated street
addresses to ensure visibility from the street for better patrol observation; and (3) The
project proponent(s) or subsequent homeowners' association shall participate in
neighborhood involvement programs established by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Department to increase community awareness and, thereby, help reduce potential crime
occurrences in the City.
Based upon the above referenced mitigation measures, the City concluded that the
identified impact upon law enforcement services and personnel, as associated with the
implementation of Alternative 2, as revised, could be effectively mitigated below a level
of significance. As indicated in Section 3.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) herein, the Applicant has, however, requested the
deletion of each of these adopted Conditions.
• Fire Protection. Although project development has the potential to reduce existing wildland
fire hazards now evident on-site, the introduction of new residents, employees and
property improvements will increase demands upon fire protection and paramedic services
(less -than -significant).
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR, the
following mitigation measures have been adopted by the City: (1) If applicable, Los Angeles
County Fire Department requirements for development in a wildland fire area shall be
incorporated to reduce potential fire hazards. These provisions include, but may not be
limited to: (a) fire -resistive protection of exterior walls/openings; (b) fire -retardant roof
covering; (c) fire -resistive construction for decks, balconies and support structures; and (d)
chimney screens installed on each chimney flue; (2) Project design and maintenance
activities shall comply with brush clearance programs administered by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department; (3) Prior to the initiation of construction activities, the project
proponent(s) shall submit and the Los Angeles County Forester and Fire Warden shall
approve a fire hazard reduction/fuel management plan to minimize brush fire hazards on-
site. That plan may include, but may not be limited to: (a) use of fire retardant
57 The following impacts are excerpted from City Council Resolution No. 94-48 which included
both the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City prior to the
City's approval of VTT 32400.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-39
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
construction materials; (b) brush clearance and maintenance activities; (c) irrigated planting
areas with pro%,;sions for maintenance activities; and (d) the provision and maintenance of
fire breaks; (3) In order to limit the potential threat of wildland fires, low -fuel volume plants
shall be incorporated into the revegetative plan; (4) Prior to the issuance of building
permits, the Los Angeles County Fire Department shall review building plans for compliance
with Los Angeles County Fire Department standards for construction, access, fire hydrant,
fire flow and water main requirements; (5) The water system shall be designed in response
to final fire flow requirements identified by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Final
fire flow will be based on building occupancy, the size of the buildings, their relationship
to other structures and property lines and type of construction materials used; (6) Prior to
the commencement of structural framing, all public water main improvements, as may be
required to meet final fire flow requirements imposed by the Los Angeles County Fire
Department, shall be completed and operational; and (7) Prior to the commencement of any
structural framing, fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department.
Based upon the above referenced mitigati
identified impacts upon fire protection ser%
implementation of Alternative 2, as revised,
of significance.
in measures, the City concluded that the
ces and personnel, as associated with the
could be effectively mitigated below a level
• Sanitary Sewers. Project development will result in the generation of additional
wastewater, requiring transport to and treatment at a County Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles County facility (less -than -significant).
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR, the
following mitigation measures have been identified and made conditions of project
approval: (1) Prior to final tract map approval, the project proponent(s) shall submit a sewer
study to both the County Engineer of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles
County and the City Engineer of the City of Diamond Bar identifying wastewater flow and
tributary flow to the existing County trunk and local sewer lines. This study shall identify:
(a) the location, phasing, bonding and details of any proposed sewer facilities and
improvements by street configuration, lot layout and gravity flow; (b) any current capacity
shortfalls of the County trunk and/or City sewer lines; and (c) specific design
recommendations to provide additional lines or sizing upgrade, if required; (2) The project
proponent(s) shall convey access and property easements and rights-of-way to the County
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, as deemed necessary by the County Engineer
of the County Sanitation Districts and City Engineer of the City of Diamond Bar, for the
construction and maintenance of sewer lines and associated facilities; (3) The project
proponent(s) shall contribute an appropriate "fair share" of cost, as established by the
County of Los Angeles and/or City of Diamond Bar, to fund improvements to the area's
main lines, pumping stations, etc.; (4) Prior to final tract map approval, sewer connection
fees, as established by the County of Los Angeles and/or City of Diamond Bar, shall be
paid by the project proponent(s); (5) The project proponent(s) shall provide to the County
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County information regarding the construction and/or
building schedule of the project so that the timing of the County Sanitation Districts'
expansion, if required, may be coordinated with the projected increase in demand; and (6)
Prior to the approval of the final tract map, the area affected by the subdivision map shall
South Pointe Master Plan 4-40
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
be annexed into the Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, administered by the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works.
Based upon the above referenced mitigation measures, the City concluded that the
identified impacts upon sanitary sewer systems, as associated with the implementation of
Alternative 2, as revised, could be effectively mitigated below a level of significance.
Solid Waste. (1) Grading operations, including the removal of existing vegetation and
associated organic matter in proximity to those activities, and resulting construction
activities may necessitate the subsequent disposal of solid wastes in County landfills (less -
than -significant); and (2) Upon occupancy, alternative project implementation will result in
the generation of additional solid wastes requiring collection and subsequent disposal (less-
than-significant).58
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR, the
following mitigation measures have been identified and made conditions of alternative
project approval: (1) In order to minimize the impact of the development of the project on
solid waste disposal facilities and systems within the County of Los Angeles and to
facilitate the attainment of source reduction and recycling objectives of the City of
Diamond Bar, the project proponent(s) shall: (a) consult with the City, the County
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works regarding implementation strategies to reduce and/or recycle wastes during
construction and following completion of those activities that would otherwise require
disposal in local landfills; and (b) consult with the current refuse removal collection
company(ies) regarding design standards for access to, location and construction of trash
container enclosures, and such other measures to facilitate implementation of automated
refuse collection and source reduction and recycling options; (2) Following occupancy trash
bins and barrel recycling enclosures shall be provided and maintained in locations
acceptable to the City of Diamond Bar. Such information shall be specifically shown on
the plans submitted for building permits; (3) The project proponent(s) or subsequent
homeowners' association shall comply with those source reduction and recycling and
composting requirements as may be adopted by the City of Diamond Bar, in accordance
with Assembly Bill 939; (4) The project proponent(s) or subsequent homeowners'
association shall encourage the segregation of green wastes, as specified under the City's
Source Reduction Recycling Element and County Sanitation Districts waste diversion
policies; (5) The project proponent(s) shall comply with all applicable City of Diamond Bar
and County of Los Angeles regulations, in force and effect at the time building permits are
issued, concerning drop-off bins, trash enclosures and storage areas for recovered
materials, recycling programs and other means of reducing the amount of waste requiring
disposal both during and after the project is implemented.
Based upon the above referenced mitigation measures, the City concluded that each of the
identified impacts associated with the implementation of Alternative 2, as revised, could
be effectively mitigated below a level of significance. As indicated in Section 3.3
58 The "alternative project" referenced herein relates, in part, to VTT 32400, as approved by the
City on October 18, 1994.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-41
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
(Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) herein, the
Applicant has, however, requested the deletion of each of these adopted Conditions.
• Parks and Recreation. Project development will increase existing demands upon areawide
recreational resources (less -than -significant).
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final EIR, the
following mitigation measure has been identified and made a condition of project approval:
The project proponent(s) shall coordinate development plans with the Los Angeles County
Department of Parks and Recreation to facilitate implementation of the County's regional
trail system. If required by the County, adequate provisions (e.g., trail dedication, signage)
shall be provided to ensure the dedication of any required trail links.
Based upon the above referenced mitigation measure, the City concluded that the identified
impact upon parks and recreation associated with the implementation of Alternative 2, as
revised, could be effectively mitigated below a level of significance.
• Educational Facilities. Project development will directly result in the introduction of new
students into area schools; existing student capacities and/or proposed facility expansion
plans indicate that areawide schools can accommodate those additional students which
may result from project development (less -than -significant).
Adopted Mitigation Measures. Based upon the proximity of the project site to the South
Pointe Middle School, the Final EIR identified the following mitigation measures which have
been subsequently adopted by the City as conditions of project approval: (1) Grading
activities anticipated to occur adjoining the South Pointe Middle School site shall be
coordinated with the Walnut Valley Unified School District to minimize disruptions to
current school operations; and (2) Prior to the approval of the grading plan, the project
proponent(s) shall submit a safety plan to the City of Diamond Bar. Said safety plan shall
identify appropriate measures to be undertaken during grading activities to minimize
disruptions to school activities, shall address on-site security plans to limit unauthorized
access upon the site, and shall address potential health and safety considerations relative
to pedestrian activities in proximity to those construction operations.
Based upon the above referenced mitigation measures, the City concluded that the
identified impacts upon educational facilities, as associated with the implementation of
Alternative 2, as revised, could be effectively mitigated below a level of significance.
4.9.1 Approval of VTT 52203
Implementation of VTT 52203 will result in a net increase in the number of residential units
conditionally approved by the City for VTT 32400. The potential impacts upon public services
and facilities associated with VTT 52203 are, therefore, those associated with the introduction
of 14 new dwelling units thereupon.
For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that each of the Conditions adopted by the City
for VTT 32400 continue to apply to VTT 52203, unless subsequently modified by the City
pursuant to a request of the Applicant. As identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted
South Pointe Master Plan 4-42
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) herein, revisions to a number of
potentially applicable conditions of approval have been formally requested by the Applicant.
Based upon the deletion of those Conditions, the post -project impacts attributable to VTT
52203 and VTT 32400 upon public services and facilities have been described herein.
Based upon the law enforcement officer to population ratio presented in the Final EIR (i.e.,
0.63 sworn offices per 1,000 residents)59 and assuming a per unit average household size of
3.03 individuals per household, the addition of 14 dwelling units will theoretically increase
demands upon law enforcement personnel by an estimated 0.03 sworn officers. From a
cumulative perspective, the increased demands associated with all development activities
approved or pending within the South Pointe Master Plan Project area totals approximately
0.24 sworn officers (i.e., VTT 32400: 91 units = 0.17 officers; VTT 52203: 16 units = 0.03
officers; TT 51253: 21 units = 0.04 officers). This cumulative demand is significantly less
than the 0.38 sworn officers identified in the Final EIR based upon the build -out of the South
Pointe Master Plan Project.
As proposed, those streets internal to VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 are now proposed as
private streets with access to the tract map area restricted by a gated entryway. By
restricting public access to the project area, the number of property -related crimes will be
reduced; thereby reducing project -related demands upon police services. Similarly, since the
rate of traffic accidents is related, in part, to the volume of traffic along affected roadways,
the reduction in the number of vehicles which have access to the tract map area will reduce
the potential for traffic -related accidents necessitating police department response.
As further indicated in the Final EIR, a statistically derived demand for one fire fighting
personnel has been established for each 6,500 City residents.60 The introduction of 14
additional residential units upon the project site will, therefore, produce a theoretical demand
for less than 0.01 fire protection personnel. Based upon the analysis presented in the Final
EIR, this increase is deemed insignificant.
Based upon the wastewater generation rates presented in the Final EIR,61 a net increase of 14
dwelling units will result in the generation of approximately 3,640 gallons of wastewater per
day.62 This projection increases to about 33,280 gallons per day based upon all development
activities authorized and proposed within the South Pointe Master Plan Project area (i.e., 128
dwelling units). This figure is significantly below the 398,210 gallons projected in the Final
EIR based upon the build -out of that master plan. Since the Final EIR concluded that the
quantity of wastewater generated by the South Pointe Master Plan Project would be less -than -
59 Op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan, p. 4-149.
60 Ibid., p. 4-160.
61 Ibid., Table 32, Estimated Wastewater Generation, p. 4-169.
62 In contrast, 65,850 square feet of commercial use would generate an estimated 21,400 gallons
during that same period. By reducing the amount of sanitary sewage requiring treatment at a County
facility, cumulative demands requiring the expansion of that facility would be incrementally reduced.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-43
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
significant and since the quantity of sewerage generated by the revised project is less than
that amount, no significant environmental effects will result from -che revised project.
As further indicated in the Final EIR, solid waste generation rates are based upon an estimated
3.03 individuals per household and 7.8 pounds of municipal solid waste (MSW) per person per
day.63 Based upon a net increase of 14 dwelling units, an estimated 331 pounds of MSW
would be generated daily.64 Based upon the potential attainment of those source reduction and
recycling objectives established under the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (i.e.,
a 50 percent reduction by the year 2000), the amount of MSW requiring landfill disposal would
be reduced to approximately 166 pounds per day. Existing areawide solid waste facilities are
deemed adequate to accommodate this projected increase in wastes requiring landfill disposal.
When combined with the MSW generated by the 93 units now authorized under VTT 32400
(2,198 pounds/day) and the 21 units approved under TT 51253 (496 pounds/day), all
development approved or pending within the South Pointe Master Plan Project site would
produce approximately 3,025 pounds of MSW per day. This projection is significantly below
the 9,367 pounds/day associated with the previously proposed South Pointe Master Plan
Project. Since the Final EIR concluded that project -related (i.e., South Pointe Master Plan
Project) and cumulative solid waste impacts were less -than -significant and since the total
waste generated by those approved and pending projects is significant less than the quantity
of MSW identified therein, the project's (i.e., VTT 52203) potential solid waste impacts are
also deemed to be less -than -significant.
In accordance with Section 21.24.340 of Title 21 of the Los Angeles County Code, park fees
will collected from the Applicant upon recordation of the final vesting tract map.65 The fee
structure contained therein is established by the City and based upon a local assessment of
park requirements. Payment of all applicable park fees will mitigate any potential impacts upon
park facilities to a less -than -significant level.
As authorized under Assembly Bill 2426, the Walnut Valley Unified School District collects
school fees for both residential and commercial development. As with Quimby Act fees, the
fee structure established by the District is intended to reflect the demands upon education
facilities produced by those different land uses. The payment of established fees is considered
adequate mitigation for the impacts generated by those activities.
In the absence of new environmental impacts and/or an increase in the severity of those
effects which have been previously identified, no further mitigation measures have been
recommended as a result of this analysis.
63 Ibid., Table 34, Estimated Solid Waste Generation, p. 4-176.
64 Should a commercial development proceed on that same site, more than 1,170 pounds of solid
waste would require collection and off-site disposal. By diminishing the amount of solid waste
generated from a development activity, impacts upon local landfills are incrementally reduced.
ss Since commercial development projects are not required to pay park dedication (Quimby Act)
fees, retail activities do not further the City's objective to expand locally available recreational
opportunities.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-44
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.9.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Since the proposed revisions to VTT 32400 will not result in an increase in the number of
residential units previously authorized by the City thereupon, the implementation of the revised
project will not increase site-specific demands upon public services and facilities beyond that
level previously disclosed in the Final EIR. As a result, no additional mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.9.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
As indicated in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 32400) herein, a number of the proposed revisions to the adopted Conditions relate
to or potentially affect public services and/or facilities. As indicated therein, revised Conditions
relate to police protection services and solid waste collection and disposal.
As proposed, the Applicant requests the deletion of "MRMP 31," "MRMP 32," and "MRMP
33." As revised, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department would no longer actively review
proposed development plans for the purpose of identifying additional security features and/or
design recommendations to minimize project -related impacts upon that agency. Both of the
above referenced mitigation measures were included in the Final EIR based upon the then
proposed mixed use nature of the South Pointe Master Plan Project and the public ownership
of the proposed street system.
Based upon the elimination of on-site commercial uses, the retention of the streets as private
roadways, and the introduction of access controls to limits unauthorized entry upon the project
site, project -related impacts upon police services will be effectively minimized. As a result,
in recognition of the proposed revisions to the project, the elimination of these mitigation
measures will neither result in the introduction of new impacts upon affected law enforcement
agencies nor increase the severity of those impacts which were previously identified.
"MRMP 48" and "MRMP 51 " specifically address solid waste collection activities associated
with commercial land uses. The subsequent elimination of those uses negates the need for
those mitigation measures. Additionally, notwithstanding the inclusion of a specific mitigation
measure (i.e., "Condition E19" and "MRMP 50") designed to encourage source reduction and
recycling efforts, the project will be required to comply with all applicable policies contained
in the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste
Element. As a result, the deletion of "MRMP 50" will not adversely effect the City's ongoing
efforts to comply with the source reduction and recycling objectives contained therein.
Since the elimination of these Conditions will neither result in the introduction of new
environmental impacts not previously disclosed in the Final EIR nor increase the severity of
those effects identified therein, no further mitigation measures are deemed appropriate herein.
4.10 Archeology/Paleontology
Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.9 (Archaeology/Paleontology) in the Final EIR. As indicated in the Final EIR, the
following environmental impact upon cultural resources was identified therein:
South Pointe Master Plan 4-45
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
• Based upon the findings of a field reconnaissance survey, a number of paleontological
localities have been identified. No prehistoric (archaeological) or historic resources have
been identified on the property (less -than -significant).
As further indicated in the Final EIR, a number of localities exist upon the area of VTT 32400.68
As a result, the Findings adopted by the City following certification of the Final EIR continued
to identify the above referenced impact for the project subsequently approved by the City.
Based upon the suspected presence of those features within the area of VTT 32400, the
following mitigation measure was adopted by the City for that vesting tentative tract: Upon
implementation of grading operations, a paleontological grading observation schedule, by a
certified paleontologist, shall be maintained when grading in bedrock units to further evaluate
the fossil resources of the site. Salvage operations shall be initiated and coordinated with the
project proponent(s), if significant concentrations of fossils are encountered.6"
Impacts upon cultural resources occur when those resources are either lost or destroyed
through grading operations. As a result, it is the implementation of the grading plan rather
than the resulting land use which has the potential to adversely impact those resources. Since
planned grading operations associated with the implementation of VTT 32400 would include
the same geographic area notwithstanding the subsequent development of either commercial
or residential development activities thereupon, the physical impacts upon identified and
suspected cultural resources attributable to VTT 32400 would be similar based upon either a
residential or nonresidential land use.
4.10.1 Approval of VTT 52203
As indicated herein, VTT 52203 does not exist in isolation of VTT 32400. Since VTT 52203
will occupy the site of the two residual residential parcels previously approved as part of VTT
32400, grading operations undertaken as part of that approved subdivision will result in
excavation activities which have the potential to affect on-site and near -site cultural resources.
Based upon established Conditions, adequate mitigation measures are presently in place to
reduce the potential impacts upon cultural resources attributable to both VTT 32400 and VTT
52203.68 Since no additional impacts are anticipated beyond those previously disclosed in the
Final EIR, no further mitigation measures are deemed necessary herein.
4.10.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
None of the proposed design revisions identified in Section 3.2.2 (Design Revisions to Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) herein will result in a substantial revision to the proposed
66 Op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report for the South Pointe Master Plan, Figure 50,
Paleontological Locality Map, p. 4-203.
61 Op. Cit., City Council Resolution No. 94-48.
68 Since the underlying map (i.e., VTT 32400) imposes Conditions subsequently affecting VTT
52203, the above referenced mitigation measure is also applicable to the pending project.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-46
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
grading plan for VTT 32400 or result in the creation of potential environmental impacts beyond
the limits described in the Final EIR. As a result, no additional impacts upon paleontological
resources are likely to occur should the revised project be approved as proposed.
In the absence of new identifiable environmental effects and/or an increase in the severity of
those impacts previously disclosed in the Final EIR, no further mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.10.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
As described in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 32000), the Applicant has identified a number of adopted Conditions which the
Applicant has requested be deleted or revised. None of the Conditions identified therein will
manifest as physical impacts upon or changes to the existing environment. Based upon the
absence of any physical direct or indirect effect thereupon, those revisions will not produce
either new environmental consequences (not previously disclosed) or increase the severity of
those impacts identified in the Final EIR. As a result, no additional mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.11 Aesthetics
Information in this section supplements that previous environmental analysis contained in
Section 4.10 (Aesthetics) in the Final EIR. Based upon the findings of that investigation, the
following aesthetic impact was identified therein:
• Project development will physically alter the project site and change its existing character
from a natural open space parcel to a property more characteristic of other residential and
nonresidential areas within the City. Additionally, the proposed removal of existing oak
trees will result in the loss of this identified aesthetic resource (less -than -significant).
As subsequently indicated in Findings, although this identified impact was initially formulated
in response to the then proposed South Pointe Master Plan Project, the City determined that
this effect also applies individually to each of the projects (e.g., VTT 32400) which comprised
that planning document. Based upon the continuing application of that visual impact to the
development of VTT 32400, the City adopted as Conditions the following mitigation measures
as excerpted from the Final EIR: (1) A homeowners' association or landscape/lighting district
shall be formed, per City of Diamond Bar requirements, to finance the maintenance of and to
maintain common open space areas within the project site; and (2) Prior to the initiation of
grading activities, a replacement plan for the loss of existing oak trees shall be submitted by
the project applicant(s) and, upon acceptance, approved by the City of Diamond Bar.
Notwithstanding the nature of the development proposed (e.g., residential; commercial), visual
impacts result primarily from those landform alterations produced by on-site grading operations
and include both physiographic changes to the project site and the removal of existing
vegetation thereupon. As a result, it is the grading activities rather the ultimate land use
which has the potential to produce the greatest aesthetic impact. Since the previously
proposed commercial development of the area of VTT 52203 would necessitate similar
landform alterations to those associated with a residential use thereupon, the potential visual
South Pointe Master Plan 4-47
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
impacts attributable to both a residential and nonresidential use would be generally similar from
a landform alteration perspective.
Existing development adjoining the project site includes other residential uses to the north, an
institutional use (i.e., South Pointe Middle School) to the west, open space to the south, and
the SR -57 Freeway to the east. Since no existing commercial uses now exist in the immediate
vicinity of the project, the introduction of a commercial land use would generate greater visual
impacts than would the further extension of existing residential uses thereupon.
Should the two residual parcels within VTT 32400 be developed for commercial use (as
described in the Final EIR), up to 68,850 square feet of commercial use could be developed
thereupon. By eliminating the previously approved commercial component, the entire area
comprising VTT 32400, inclusive of VTT 52203, would be developed under a single land use
classification (i.e., low-density residential). As a result, the potential land use conflicts (e.g.,
noise; light and glare), as identified in the Final EIR and relating to the proximity of commercial
and residential development and their different operational characteristics, would be eliminated.
Since homogeneity is typically considered to be a positive aesthetic characteristic, the
elimination of a proposed nonresidential land use reflecting a different development scale (e.g.,
height; bulk) than the adjoining residential development would serve to promote uniformity in
project design.
4.11.1 Approval of VTT 52203
Implementation of VTT 52203 will result in the subdivision of the two residual residential
parcels located in the southerly portion of VTT 32400 into 16 residential lots, three numbered
streets, and three common -area lots. The minimum lot size of the resulting residential lots is
estimated to be about 7,800 square feet. The lot sizes represented in VTT 52203 are similar
in size and dimension to those approved by the City as part of VTT 32400.
Since the area defined by VTT 52203 is internal to the area of VTT 32400, the implementation
of the grading plan for VTT 32400 will result in the physical alteration to the Sandstone
Canyon area and will result in the creation of the two residual residential parcels approved
thereunder. As a result, the existing physical environment upon which VTT 52203 is proposed
is more accurately described as the post -graded area of VTT 32400. The potential impacts
attributable to the landform alterations required for the implementation of VTT 52203 would,
therefore, be significantly less than those previously described for VTT 32400. However, the
potential cumulative efforts associated with VTT 52203 (i.e., in combination with VTT 32400)
would be similar to those identified for VTT 32400.
In the absence of any additional adverse environmental effects, no further mitigation measures
are recommended herein.
4.11.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
Those design revisions included in VTT 32400 are intended to: (1) facilitate improved vehicular
access to the area of VTT 52203 (e.g., reconfiguration of interior roadways); (2) create an
enhanced visual identity for VTT 32400 (e.g., gated access); and/or (3) acknowledge the
South Pointe Master Plan 4-48
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
existence of a changed project setting (e.g., relocation of the borrow site). Those minor
revisions to the internal street system remain consistent with the City's street standards and
will allow for a safe and efficient movement of traffic thereupon. A uniform landscape and
street tree program will serve to visually integrate VTT 32400 and VTT 52203.
Based upon the District's need to proceed with the construction of the South Pointe Middle
School, the District independently approved (following its own CEQA review) a grading plan
resulting in the relocation of that stockpiled soil material which was stored upon that school
site. In relocating that material to the area previously defined as VTT 51407, the District
implemented a contour grading plan designed to minimize the visual impacts associated with
that action. The resulting stockpile site has been subsequently landscaped to more closely
represent a naturalized condition.
Upon project implementation, that manufactured hillside will be removed and utilized as part
of the soil importation requirements for VTT 32400. The post -project conditions in proximity
to that borrow site will, therefore, reasonably reflect the site conditions which existed prior
to the initiation of the District's grading operations.
Most residential projects are constructed with a perimeter wall, designed to create a unifying
visual character to the project, provide security to project residents, and serve as a barrier to
externally generated environmental effects (e.g., light/glare; noise). Additionally, most private
streets include a gate or other devise to limit unauthorized access. The City of Diamond Bar
has a number of established single-family residential communities (e.g., The County) where
similar access controls are presently in place. As a result, the provision of a gated entry
feature will not introduce a disharmonious visual element to the community.
Although project implementation will alter the existing visual character of the project site,
those impacts were previously examined in the Final EIR. The proposed revisions to the
approved development plan for VTT 32400 will neither result in the introduction of new
aesthetic effects not disclosed therein nor increase the severity of those identified impacts.
As a result, no additional mitigation measures have been recommended as a result of this
environmental review.
4.11.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
None of the Conditions identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 32000) will manifest as physical impacts upon or changes to the
existing environmental setting. Based upon the absence of any physical direct or indirect
effect thereupon, those revisions will not produce either new environmental consequences (not
previously disclosed in the Final EIR) or increase the severity of those impacts identified
therein.
4.12 Growth Inducement
Based upon the implementation of the South Pointe Master Plan and its individual components,
no growth -inducing effects were identified in either the Final EIR or in the adopted Findings.
In the absence of any identifiable effect, no mitigation measures were recommended in the
earlier environmental analysis.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-49
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.12.1 Approval of VTT 52203
The assessment concerning whether a particular project has the potential to create growth -
inducing effects is based upon a determination whether the project has the potential to: (1)
produce a population in -migration to fill project -related employment opportunities which, in
turn, would induce additional residential development; (2) result in an increased localized
demand for goods and services at a level sufficient to induce additional commercial
development; (3) result in the removal of economic, physical or political barriers to
development; and (4) facilitate peripheral development through the extension of facilities
and/or services to an area presently void of those features.
As documented in the Final EIR, a sufficient local labor force exists to support project
construction. The construction techniques utilized for residential development are not of a
nature necessitating the importation of highly specialized workers which are not available in
the regional labor pool.
As indicated in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Diamond Bar General Plan
and Addendum, "implementation of the Diamond Bar General Plan will permit the construction
of appropriate residential, commercial, and industrial projects within the City that are
consistent with the General Plan."69 Although the construction of new residential units will
impose additional demands upon available retail use, the City (through its general plan) has
ensured the availability of adequate nonresidential development to respond to localized
demands. As a result, the construction and habitation of 16 units upon the area of VTT
52203 will not result in the introduction of additional demands upon those facilities sufficient
to predicate the expansion of localized or regional commercial development activities.
Since the area of VTT 52203 is contained within the boundaries of VTT 32400, project
implementation will not result in either the removal of existing development constraints or
result in the expansion of existing infrastructure facilities beyond the tract map boundaries.
In the absence of an identifiable growth -inducing effect, no additional mitigation measures are
recommended herein.
4.12.2 Design Revisions to VTT 32400
None of the design revisions proposed as part of VTT 32400 will result in an increase in the
number of dwelling units authorized thereupon. Since VTT 32400 was included as part of the
analysis of the South Pointe Master Plan Project and since the Final EIR concluded that no
growth -inducing effects would result therefrom, the proposed revisions will not alter the
conclusions presented in that earlier environmental analysis.
4.12.3 Revisions to the Approved Conditions for VTT 32400
None of the Conditions identified in Section 3.2.3 (Revisions to Adopted Conditions for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 32000) will manifest as physical impacts upon or changes to the
ss Op. Cit., Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Diamond Bar General Plan and
Addendum, p. VII -1.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-50
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
environment. Based upon the absence of any physical direct or indirect effect thereupon,
those revisions will neither produce either new environmental consequences (not previously
disclosed in the Final EIR) nor increase the severity of those impacts identified therein.
South Pointe Master Plan 4-51
Addendum to the Final EIR
SECTION 5.0 DETERMINATION
SECTION 5.0
DETERMINATION
South Pointe Master Plan
Addendum to the Final EIR
SEGTION 5.0 UTEREIVATION
5.0 DETERMINATION
Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CCR, a Lead Agency is authorized to prepare an "addendum
to an EIR" if: (1) none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation
of a subsequent EIR have occurred; (2) only minor technical changes or additions are necessary
to make the EIR under consideration adequate under CEQA; and (3) the changes to the EIR
made by the addendum do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the
environment.
An addendum can be completed where only "minor technical changes or additions" are
proposed or required. This CEQA reference implies that addenda should be used when the
agency wants to make purely technical modifications to the information presented in the
previously certified EIR.
Based upon the findings of this environmental analysis, none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 of the CCR have occurred. Although minor revisions to that project (i.e.,
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 32400) previously approved by the City Council have been
proposed by the Applicant, those changes do not require important revisions to the previously
certified Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not
considered in that EIR. Additionally, no substantial changes have been identified regarding
the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require important revisions
in the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered
therein. No new information of substantial importance has becomes available which
demonstrates that either the pending project revisions will have one or more significant effects
not previously discussed in the Final EIR or that those significant effects previously examined
will be substantially more severe than shown in that certified document. Finally, no new
mitigation measures have been identified which would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project below those levels disclosed in the Final EIR.
Based upon the findings of this environmental analysis, the City concludes that an addendum
constitutes the appropriate mechanism to augment the previously certified EIR to incorporate
an appropriate assessment of the environmental impacts associated with both the adoption
of VTT 52203 and the proposed revisions to the previously approved project.
South Pointe Master Plan 5_1
Addendum to the Final EIR
LOT 10 LOT 1 1 LOT 12 LOT 15
ACCE3g
3: 1 UP 5LOPE � �Q�
F.—. 6
SECTION A—A
9GALC !�•• •-o-
6R106ANE 60> TRGL•
wwre ALceRs
):1 UP SUCIPS
HNaTlwiW MOlw��c
ri.." Z-6 ., wO.o.a.
PSOESMAL
OEI18N
ASSOCIATES
— L_
14
O
O U 'J
� i Y
m n
0 o z
U
Ea
m �Q
�o
O
N
N
F'N I
O � JOC
L N 1�f1
e m=
l7 N
Ril lilll
GONGGPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PL,>
7� e
/T
„n.
• Ifs _ _ -
ii, .`
HP OfficeJet LX
Personal Printer/Fax/Copier
Automatic Log
Identification Result
Daily Bulletin OK
Tribune OK
7.3.0
Fax Log Report for
City of Diamond Bar, CA
909-861-3117
Oct -08-96 01:04 PM
Paces Tv a Date Time Duration Diagnostic
02/02 Sent Oct -08 01:02P 00:00:52 002562030022
02/02 Sent Oct -08 01:03P 00:00:54 002562030022
ATTN: NANCY LEGALS ATTN: JUDY NOBLE
PLEASE PUBLISH ON October 10, 1996
IF ANY QUESTIONS Please Contact:
Marilyn, City of Diamond Bar (909) 396-5676
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that public hearings will be
conducted by the City Council on the following items:.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203: A request to subdivide a 6.3 gross acre site into 16
numbered lots for single family residential development and 6 lettered lots for streets and landscaping.
This proposal is a further subdivision of Vesting Tentative Map 32400, Lots 92 & 93, which is a 93 lot
subdivision with 91 residential lots and 2 remainder lots, located on the west side of Brea Canyon Road,
north of Pathfinder Road.
Environmental Determination: On June 3, 1994, the City Council Certified the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the South Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040) which includes
the subject property. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Sec. 15164, it has
been determined that potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project will not require
major revisions to the EIR in that no significant changes in circumstances under which the project is
undertaken have occurred and no new information or issues of substantial importance not previously
addressed in the Final EIR have been identified through the subsequent environmental review and
therefore an addendum to the Final EIR has been prepared.
Applicant: Diamond Crest Estates, LLC, 27285 Las Rambles, Suite 230, Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Property Owners: Arciero and Sons, 950 North Tustin, Anaheim, CA 92807
City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
If you are unable to attend the public hearing, but wish to send written comments, please write to the
Planning Division of the Diamond Bar Community Development Department at the address given below.
You may also obtain additional information concerning this case by phoning (909) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you
or someone else raised by written correspondence concerning the project as described in this notice,
delivered to the City Council at or prior to, the public hearing.
DATE & TIME OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, November 5, 1996, 6:30 p.m.
LOCATION OF HEARINGS: South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Dr.,
Diamond Bar, California 91765
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular office hours at the Community
Development Department, 21660 Copley Drive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar, California, 91765.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Tommye Cribbins
FROM: Catherine Johnson, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: VTT 52203
DATE: September 30, 1996
Please schedule the above mentioned project for the November 5, 1996
City Council meeting. The legal add is attached.
U