HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/13/2012MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Lin called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room,
21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C/Torng led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, Tony Torng, Vice Chairman
Steve Nelson and Chairman Jimmy Lin
Absent: Commissioner Jack Shah was excused.
Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Grace
Lee, Senior Planner; Josue Espino, Contract Planner; and Stella Marquez,
Administrative Coordinator.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 13, 2012.
C/Torng moved, VC/Nelson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of October 13, 2012, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll
Call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
6. OLD BUSINESS:
6. NEW BUSINESS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None.
None.
Farago, Torng, VC/Nelson, Chair/Lin
None
Shah
7.1 Development Review No. PL 2012-380 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar
Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and owners, George and Araceli
Martinez, requested Development Review approval to construct a 476 square -
foot living area addition, an 88 square -foot front porch and reconfiguration of a
three -car garage (modified to a two -car garage and office) at the front of an
• 13, 2012 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSIOL
existing 2,089 square -foot, two story, single family residence on a 17,920 gross
square -foot (0.41 acre) lot. The subject property is zoned Low Medium
Residential (RLM) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use
designation of Low Medium Residential.
22831 Rio Lobos Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
George and Araceli Martinez
22831 Rio Lobos Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
CP/Espino presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Development Review No. PL 2012-380, based on the Findings of
Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
C/Torng asked for explanation regarding the development standards in the staff
report table. He asked if the front setback was supposed to be 30 feet and
CP/Espino responded no, because in the RLM Zoning district, the front setback
is 20 feet. Thirty feet is the standard for the RR zone.
VC/Nelson asked for confirmation that the percentage of lot coverage which is
well within the Code applied to the entire lot and not just the front yard to which
CP/Espino responded that VC/Nelson was correct.
Chair/Lin asked if the reference to electrical on Sheet A-3.0 of the architectural
plans was an error because he did not see any electrical drawings on that
sheet. CP/Espino responded that Chair/Lin was correct and that the applicant
would be directed to correct that error in plan check.
George Martinez said he was satisfied with the development review and hoped
his project would be approved.
Chair/Lin opened the public hearing.
With no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Lin closed the
public hearing.
VC/Nelson moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Development Review
No. PL 2012-380, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions
of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll
Call vote:
NOVEMBER 13, 2012 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
AYES:, COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Torng, VC/Nelson, Chair/Lin
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Shah
7.2 Development Review No. PL 2012-177 — Under the authority of'Diamond Bar
Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Xin Wang and owner, Clarence
Lui, requested Development Review approval to construct a 383 square -foot
addition to the front of an existing 2,718 square -foot single family residence on
a 100,100 gross square foot (2.29 acre) lot. The subject property is zoned
Rural, Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use
designation of Rural Residential.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2226 Rusty Pump Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Clarence Lui
2226 Rusty Pump Road -
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Xin Wang
119834 Camino de Rosa
Walnut, CA 91789
CP/Espino presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Development Review No. PL 2012-177, based on the Findings of
Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
Chair/Lin asked if, in accordance with the development standards table in the
staff report, if the existing rear setback was eight feet because the A-1 drawing
shows a rear setback of six to eight feet. CP/Espino responded that in this
particular case, no area is being added to the rear of the home. However, it is
an existing non -conforming condition. The existing setback is measured from
the rear building pad line.
VC/Nelson said he thought Chair/Lin was saying that the setback is much
greater than the six to eight feet under the existing condition. This is a moot
point in terms of the Commission's decision but in terms of the accuracy of the
report it makes sense to correct it. CDD/Gubman stated that the City's
Development Standards calls out a minimum requirement for a level back yard
area. Given the topography many of these lots have an ascending or
descending slope. When staff refers to the rear setback, staff is not referring to
the distance to the property line, but the distance from the rear of the building to
the edge of the level pad area before it drops off down the slope. So the
existing condition is that the rear of the house is eight feet from the edge of the
NOVEMBER 13,2012 PAGE 4 , PLANNING COMMISSIOL
pad so the setback is measured from a different point of reference than what is
normally done from a property line.
Chair/Lin asked what was considered level ground and CDD/Gubman
responded two to three percent is what is generally considered to be a level
usable area.
Chair/Lin asked if drawing A-5 across the top of the second floor and A-6
Section (AA) on the north side, the right (eastern) edge shows a bay window
but the second floor plan does not show a bay window. CP/Espino responded
that there is no bay window. CDD/Gubman explained that what Chair/Lin is
looking at is the gable for the grand entry that is part of the addition.
Clarence Lui, property owner, thanked Mr. Wang for doing an excellent job and
he said he would be very happy to receive an approval.
VC/Nelson asked why the owner is doing this expansion. Mr. Lui responded
that his family needs additional -space. This is their primary home and they are
planning ahead for retirement in this home.
Chair/Lin opened the public hearing.
With no one present who wished to speak on the item, Chair/Lin closed the
public hearing.
VC/Nelson stated that these types of requests are usually about
accommodating families who wish to stay in Diamond Bar and he is all about
that.
VC/Nelson moved, C/Torng seconded, to approve Development Review
No. PL2012-177, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Farago, Torng, VC/Nelson, Chair/Lin
None
Shah
8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
VC/Nelson said that several months ago, the City had an issue with food trucks
coming into town and they left because the City required them to purchase a permit.
CDD/Gubman said he did not recall the conversation. VC/Nelson said that over the
weekend, his neighbor complained about such a vendor at the southwest corner of
NOVEMBER 13, 2012 PAGE 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
Diamond Bar Boulevard and Grand Avenue selling sheets on the weekends and
displaying large signs and banners. If the City requires a permit for these types of
businesses (food vendors), should the City not also require a permit for the person
selling sheets.
CDD/Gubman said staff would look into the matter and asked if this occurred on a
particular day and time or over the entire weekend and VC/Nelson responded "over
the entire weekend." CDD/Gubman said that a Neighborhood Improvement Officer will
conduct a reconnaissance to find out exactly what is taking place and respond
appropriately. VC/Nelson thanked CDD/Gubman.
9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
CDD/Gubman stated that no items are scheduled 'for the November 27 meeting
and requested that tonight's meeting be adjourned to December 11, 2012, for
which at this time there is one pending item, a residential addition on Falcons
View.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in tonight's agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chairman Lin adjourned the regular meeting at 7:32 p.m. to December 11, 2012.
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 11th day of December, 2012.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Gubman,
Community Development Director
jimm Cha man