HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/22/2009MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar,
CA 91765.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Kathy Nolan, Jack Shah, Vice
Chairman Steve Nelson and Chairman Tony Torng.
Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Katherine
Laufenburger, Senior Planner; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented.
4 CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 25, 2009.
C/Shah moved, C/Nelson seconded, to approve Regular Meeting Minutes of
August 25, 2009, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
5. OLD BUSINESS: None.
6. NEW BUSINESS: None.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Lee, Nolan, Shah, VC/Nelson
Chair/Torng
None
None
7.1 Development Review No. 2009-04 - Under the authority of Diamond Bar
Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant requested approval to demolish
an existing 4,247 square foot single family residence and construct a new
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
5,658 square foot single story residence with one attached garage and one
detached garage on a 1.28 acre Rural Residential (RR) zoned parcel of land
with a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 22415 Steeplechase Lane
(Tract 30578, Lot 167, APN 8713-009-006)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Hai and Kim Nguyen
3057 Windmill Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Andrew S. Miller
25 Rana
Rancho Margarita, CA 92688
SP/Laufenbuger presented staff's report and recommended Planning
Commission approval of Development Review No. 2009-04, based on the
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution.
VC/Nelson commented that the project looked like a home that belonged in
Malibu and wondered if Diamond Bar was ready for such a project.
C/Shah asked if the architect was balancing the grade to prevent import of
soil. SP/Laufenburger responded that the applicant is doing cut and fill in on
an equal amount so that they will not be importing or exporting. C/Shah said
it was a nice design.
There were no ex parte disclosures.
Chair/Torng opened the public hearing.
Andrew Miller, project architect, said he concurred with staff's report and
conditions of approval.
Chair/Torng closed the public hearing.
VC/Nelson moved, C/Nolan seconded, to approve Development Review
No. 2009-04, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll
Call vote:
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nolan, Shah, VC/Nelson,
Chair/Torng
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
7.2 Development Review No. 2009-06 and Amendment to Comprehensive
Sign Program No. 2006-04 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal
Code Section 22.48 and Section 22.36.060, the applicant requested
approval to: 1) remodel two buildings on the south end of Diamond Hills
Plaza which were not part of the center's recent renovation (daycare building
and adjacent multi -tenant building); and 2) demolish the existing theater
building and construct a new 14,700 square foot retail building in its place.
The amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Program involves:
1) subdividing the sign panels on the pylon sign to allow for the identification
of additional tenants; 2) increasing the height of the monument signs along
Diamond Bar Boulevard to improve visibility, and 3) providing standards for
way -finding signs throughout the center. The shopping center is
approximately 18 acres in size and zoned C-2 (Community Commercial) with
a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation.
PROJECT ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER
APPLICANT:
21385 and 21335 Cold Spring Lane
and 2751 Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Bob Poyner
Country Hills Holding LLC
8115 Preston Road, Suite 400
Dallas, TX 75225
Ware Malcomb and Michael Martin
10 Edelman
Irvine, CA 92618
SP/Laufenburger presented staff's report and recommended Planning
Commission approval of Development Review No. 2009-06 and an
Amendment to Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04, based on the
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution.
C/Lee asked if the demolition was part of the original package.
/Laufenburger responded that demolition was approved as part of the
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
original package; however, due to the current economic conditions, the
applicant decided to renovate the existing buildings and maintain the existing
uses.
VC/Nelson asked if the existing versus proposed square footage would
remain the same for the multi -tenant retail and daycare center and
SR/Laufenburger confirmed that the square footage would remain the same
and the theater would actually be a little smaller.
C/Nolan asked if there were any anchor stores or developers anticipated for
the retail locations. SP/Laufenburger referred C/Nolan to the applicant.
Chair/Torng asked about the landscape plan photos and SP/Laufenburger
responded that landscape plans are preliminary and staff was pleased with
the amount of landscaping the applicant intended to install at Cold Spring
Lane to screen the daycare area. Staff required the applicant to relocate a
few items and increase the plant materials when the applicant brings forth
the final landscape plan. Chair/Torng recalled the original approval included
a second story and felt the applicant should rebuild the demolished building
before they remodel the old buildings. CDD/Gubman said he was not
familiar with the conditions to be able to respond to a certain phasing
sequence and would not be able to answer the question at this time.
CDD/Gubman responded to Chair/Torng that there is a two-story approved
building that sits along Fountain Springs. The applicant has not yet pulled
permits for this building. Chair/Torng asked staff to review the conditions of
the original approval to determine the phasing conditions.
C/Lee said he was told that this center was owned by a different entity at the
time of approval and he felt that the previous owner's agenda and current
owner's agenda might be different. SP/Laufenburger stated that the project
is subject to all of the original approval conditions and the original resolution
is attached to staff's report. All conditions apply except for the two buildings
that will not be built. CDD/Gubman explained that the three-story medical
building was approved under a Conditional Use Permit in addition to the
Development Review application and the Conditional Use Permit has expired
so that approval is actually null and void. In terms of phasing and
sequencing, staff will look at the conditions to give the Commission a better
response if the Commission wishes prior to making its decision.
VC/Nelson asked if there were any neon signs submitted under the proposed
plan and SP/Laufenburger said she did not believe any were submitted and
that they would not be permitted under the City's Code.
There were no ex parte disclosures.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair/Torng opened the public hearing.
Bob Poyner, Country Hills Holdings, responded to Commissioner's concerns
that there is an individual interested in the daycare center and a couple of
tenants that wish to locate in the renovated "Tae Kwando" building and a
tenant interested in the new retail (old theater) building. The old theater was
about 27,000 square feet and the new building is about 14,700 square feet.
The previous approval included a two-story building in the area outside of the
yellow area was to be built before he built the three-story medical office
building for which the approval has expired. Country Hills Holdings intends
to maintain interest in the existing buildings and to get the buildings on the
daycare end up to the standard of the other buildings new H -Mart where
tenants want to be located. The theater building is an existing building but it
is part of the other center with some other tenants and needs to be typical
retail. His company would like to get that solidified and leased up before
adding another two-story building because it progressively and financially
makes sense to keep that activity within the center before building a new
building. Country Hills Holdings wants to build that building in the future but it
does not make sense to build a new building and leave the big empty theater
building at one end and the other buildings not looking like the rest of the
center.
Mr. Poyner responded to Chair/Torng that he agrees with staff's conditions
and his firm is willing to work with the City's very helpful staff on any
architectural feature and landscaping they deem feasible.
C/Nolan said the complex looks very nice and is developing well. However,
the "pumpkin patch" area is a rough area. She asked if the owner planned to
place landscaping in the area that would not be developed. Mr. Poyner said
he would be happy to work with staff on doing some landscaping in that area
when his company does the construction and demo of the theater building
during the "cleanup" at the corner. In fact, he said the holding company had
already planned to do something with the corner for the good of the tenants
in that building.
CDD/Gubman said in reviewing the 2006 Conditions of Approval he found a
requirement that the Super H -Mart building as well as, all in-line spaces
adjoining that structure along with the building that houses Starbucks and
other tenants toward Diamond Bar Boulevard be completed prior to the
issuance ,of a permit for the two-story building. Further, the condition states
"that the market tenant shall occupy the building and shall be in operation
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new three-story building."
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair/Torng thanked CDD/Gubman and said he was not against the
commercial area — it is the City's bread and butter and the Commission
appreciates the applicant's efforts to make this a viable center.
Mr. Poyner reiterated that it is the owner's intention to build the two-story
building when the market dictates doing so; however, it is most important to
get the renovation completed and fill up those buildings and if that continues
that they will be coming back to the Commission with a request to build the
two-story.
Nina Mohammed, Emerald Point resident, said she was concerned about
this project being categorically exempt from the California Environmental
Qualities Act because the air quality will affect neighboring residents.
CDD/Gubman responded that the environmental determination forthe entire
shopping center was done back with the 2006 approval and that initial project
review analyzed all of the traffic, air quality, noise, construction impacts, etc.,
and included mitigation measures in the conditions of approval. This
proposed project is within the overall scope of what was originally approved
under the 2006 environmental analysis so what is being proposed now being
of a slightly lesser intensity can be regarded as exempt from further
environmental review. VC/Nelson said that Ms. Mohammed should feel
assured that the best standards and practices will be applied to the
demolition and construction. Obviously, the speaker is concerned about
fugitive dust that will rise up to her home level. Most would be so
incremental in view of all other air pollutants that it will not be noticeable but
this is the one item that would go beyond incremental and the City has a
responsibility to make certain that the applicant uses the proper watering and
demolition techniques so that plumes of dust will not rise up and enter the
neighborhood. If it should happen the speaker should call the City and the
City will respond by coming down on the construction individuals.
CDD/Gubman affirmed that staff is not shy about shutting down projects if
they do not comply.
Chair/Torng closed the public hearing.
C/Shah said he was pleased to see that something was happening in the
center and the development proposed is really a benefit to the City and the
area.
C/Shah moved, C/Lee seconded, to approve Development Review
No. 2009-06 and Amendment to Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2006-04,
based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as
listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nolan, Shah, VC/Nelson,
Chair/Torng
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: None
C/Lee said he was glad to be back and see everyone.
VC/Nelson stated that when the Commission reviewed the Hollywood Video Store at
the corner of Grand and Diamond Bar Boulevard the applicant asked for neon signs
and the Commission said no. The other night as he was driving home on Diamond
Bar Boulevard he noticed that in the 7 -Eleven shopping center there are neon signs
and wondered if they were permitted or overlooked. He has no particular bias
against neon signs; however, he believes in consistency and believes that if the City
denies neon signs for one business it should deny neon signs for all businesses.
He asked staff to look into whether neon signs were allowed at the "Thai Harmony
Cafe." CDD/Gubman said he would look into the matter. He said he dealt with
Hollywood Video in the past and knows that in the past cities have had problems
with them wanting to use a lot of neon to outline the ridgeline of their logo. Some
cities would consider that part of the sign area and found that existing examples of
what Hollywood Video had done with some of their buildings to be way too garish.
CDD/Gubman said staff would research the Cafe and get back to VC/Nelson in an
email.
9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
CDD/Gubman said there is not much to report on the stadium issue except
that a rather novel attempt by the developer to make the stadium project
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act was considered by the
state legislature and the basis for the proposed exemption was the economy
and job creation potential the project would have. The leader of the senate
managed to table the matter and asked that the developer and City of
Industry go back to negotiate with the City of Walnut and try to reach a
settlement on that lawsuit and hopefully dispense with the matter entirely.
CDD/Gubman said he understood there was overwhelming support for
granting an exemption for the stadium project but at this point the directive
has been for all parties involved in the lawsuit to go back and reach a
settlement in good faith. The attempt was to introduce a new statute to the
California Environmental Quality Act that applied only to this project.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
CDD/Gubman pointed out that the next Planning Commission would be
October 13 (three weeks from tonight) and there should be at least three
items on that agenda including a sign program for the new two-story
commercial office building at Golden Springs just east of Lemon Avenue;
one Conditional Use Permit for an educational use and, possibly another
Conditional Use Permit for another foot message establishment.
CDD/Gubman stated that the City's Human Resources Department is
currently recruiting for a permanent Senior Planner. Interviews are slated to
begin mid-October with a permanent appointment by the end of 2009.
CDD/Gubman said there was no new information to report on Site D. Staff is
working with school district staff and public comments to determine how best
to move forward. The Housing Element is stalled. Staff is discussing the
finer points of the Housing Element with State Department of Housing
Community Development and hopefully will be able to remove the last of the
barriers staff has encountered in its attempt to getting conditional certification
from HCD. The primary concern is how effective the City's programs are in
the Housing Element to ensure that the City gets the affordable housing
needs met through rezoning. As soon as resolution is achieved staff will
bring the Housing Element to the Planning Commission with a
recommendation for adoption.
CDD/Gubman stated that there is state legislation that was passed in 2006 —
AB1881, mandating that all jurisdictions in California adopt a water -efficient
landscape ordinance by January 1, 2010. Staff is working on this ordinance
to meet the deadline and avoid adopting a state -modeled ordinance that is
overly general and would not achieve the goals for Diamond Bar as well as a
tailored ordinance. The basis for requiring this ordinance is that the area is
an arid climate and water availability is a serious issue that requires stringent
approvals for landscaping plans and water practices for irrigating landscaped
areas.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in tonight's agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 7:43 p.m.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 13th day of October, 2009.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Gubman
Community Development Director
y Torng, Chair an