HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/24/2006MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 24, 2006
CALL TO ORDER:
SAA/Marquez called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar,
California 91765.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Dan Nolan and
Tony Torng.
Chairman Joe McManus, and Vice Chairperson Ruth
Low were excused.
Also present: Nancy Fong, Interim Community Development Director;
Bradley Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney; Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner,
Sandra Campbell, Contract Senior Planner; Linda Smith, Development Services
Associate and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant.
C/Torng nominated C/Nolan to serve as temporary presiding officer. C/Lee
seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Roll Call:
C/Lee
Yes
C/Torng
Yes
C/Nolan
Yes
C/Nolan assumed the gavel.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Study Session of January 10, 2006. Continued to
February 14, 2006.
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
JANUARY 24, 2006 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-02 Develo Ment Review No. 2005-15
and Minor Variance No. 2005-03 - In accordance to Code Sections 22.42,
22.58, 22.48 and 22.54, this was a request to install a wireless
telecommunications facility with antenna mounted on a monopole
camouflaged as a broadleaf tree and equipment cabinets. The Development
Review relates to architectural/design review. The Minor Variance relates to
the height of the broadleaf tree monopole that exceeds the maximum
allowable 35 -foot height.
PROJECT ADDRESS: Eastgate Water Reservoir
24995 Eastgate Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Walnut Valley Water District
271 S. Brea Canyon Road
Walnut, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Cingular Wireless
12900 5' FI — Park Plaza Drive
Cerritos, CA 90703
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Infranext, Inc., Jim Fitzsimmons
2200 Orangewood Avenue#228
Orange, CA 92868
DSA/Smith presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit 2005-02, Development Review
No. 2005-15 and Minor Variance No. 2005-03, Findings of Fact, and
conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
AC/Nolan asked for a definition of "co -location." DSA/Smith stated that the
vendor requested co -location because their grid was lower than the existing
grids and it was common to group such facilities. Acting Chair/Nolan asked if
any noise would emit from the use and DSA/Smith explained that there might
be an on-site generator, however, there would otherwise be very little noise.
Kenny Zwick, applicant's representative, explained that the application made
sense because the applicant had complied with the City's requirement to
locate the facility at a preferred facility for wireless applications. It was
JANUARY 24, 2006 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
customary for such facilities to be placed on or near water tanks since it
offered a symbiotic use and afforded the City an opportunity to gain revenue.
In this case, the site was being built for coverage and not capacity and as
systems mature antenna centerlines tend to be lowered. He stated that the
applicant read staff's report and concurred with the conditions of approval.
Mr. Zwick responded to C/Lee that the total weight of the antenna was
approximately 50 pounds.
C/Torng asked if the applicant intended to request additional sites. Mr. Zwick
indicated that Cingular was going to a higher frequency in order to provide
better signal. These sites tend to expand and contract depending on usage.
For example, with the current system the 30th person attempting to make a
call on a sector would not have good reception and with the installation the
usage capability should about double.
C/Torng moved, C/Lee seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit
No. 2005-02, Development Review No. 2005-15 and Minor Variance
No. 2005-03, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Torng, AC/Nolan
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Low, Chair/McManus
8. PLANNING COMMSSIONER COMM ENTSIiNFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
C/Torng wished his colleagues a Happy Lunar New Year, the Year of the Dog.
9. STAFF COMMENTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
9.2 Form Based Codes (Continued to February 14, 2006)
9.3 Art in Public Places (Continued to February 14, 2006)
TCDD/Fong stated that at the February 14, 2006, meeting she would forward a staff
report that discussed what was meant by "public convenience and "necessity" as
well as the process for determining the duties.
ICDDIFong commented that the date for the Planners Institute should be March
instead of May. She asked the Commissioners to read the publication on the
JANUARY 24, 2006 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
Monterey conference and indicate to SAA/Marquez whether they would like to
attend. AC/Nolan said he highly recommended that his colleagues attend the
conference.
AC/Nolan asked if ACA/Wohlenberg would comment on a recent Supreme Court
case involving aesthetics for cell sites. ACA/Wohlenberg explained that the 9t�`
Circuit Court decision dealt with cell facilities that were installed in the public right-of-
way. The Court decided that aesthetic concerns a city may have was not something
that was allowed to be regulated under state law. However, 7901.1 allows some
"time, place and manner" regulation but the court decided that aesthetics did not fall
within those parameters. He felt that the City of La Canada Flintridge may very well
appeal the decision because there was a substantial body of law that discusses how
local government does have an aesthetic interest in the public rights-of-way.
AC/Nolan stated that a home on Golden Springs Drive north just past Sycamore
Canyon Park and Golden Prados has a smashed retaining wall between the house
and the sidewalk and since the wall had remained in bad condition for several
weeks he wondered if the City could step in to facilitate repairs. ICDD/Fong said she
would report the matter to Code Enforcement. AC/Nolan offered that the
Neighborhood Improvement Association or a local service club might be able to
assist the property owner if necessary.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in tonight's agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
AC/Nolan adjourned the meeting at 7:32 p.m.
Ily Submitted
Nancy Fong
Interim Com
Dan Nolan, Acting Chairman
opment Director