Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/26/2003MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 26,_2003 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air OL Management/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Nelson led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Steve Tye, Vice Chairman Dan Nolan, Commissioners Steve Nelson, Joe Ruzicka and.lack Tan Also present: Ann Lungu, Associate Planner and Stella Marq Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: �one Offe 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 12, 2003. 4.2 Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting of August 13, 2003 C/Ruzicka moved, VC/Nelson seconded, to approve the consent calen presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ruzicka, Tanaka, Nels n, VC/ Chair/Tye NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: 5.1 Development Code Amendment No. 2003-01 — Tem ora Elect ' Signs — (pursuant to Code Section 22.44) is a request to amend following Article/Section of the Development Code. lity ar, 'as AUUST 26, 2003 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ARTICLE III Sections 22.36.050 and 22.36.080 — Exemptions from Sign Permits and Prohibited Signs: Amendment relates to the placement and size of election signs and signs in the public right-of-way. AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission adoption of the draft resolution. Chair/Tye reiterated the Commissions desire to remain with the current standard of 30 days. AssocPlLungu referred to CA/Jenkins' recommendation that the courts determined that 30 days was unacceptable and 45 days was unacceptable. Therefore, 60 days was an acceptable amount of time. Chair/Tye agreed that CA/Jenkins recommended the aforementioned. However, the Planning Commission felt the existing code was defeasible and did not support doubling the amount of time. VC/Nolan felt that 30 days was sufficient and that signage should not be allowed in the public right-of-way. C/Tanaka was not comfortable with a one -for -all regulation. He felt there were instances in which temporary signs should be permitted. C/Ruzicka agreed that political signs should not be left up too long. However, the City Attorney had a good point. Sixty days is not as intrusive as 120 days. Having run for the City Council he understood why individuals would want to have their signs in place for a longer period of time. C/Nelson agreed with C/Tanaka. He did not feel comfortable recommending no signs in the public right-of-way. He also agreed that signs in the public right-of-way is blight. As a compromise, if signs were allowed in the public right-of-way, he would definitely favor a 30 -day limit. In other words, leave the code as written. �L� 1 1 AUUST 26, 2003 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSIQN VC/Nolan opined that the City Attorney stated cities could hot legislate content. Therefore, when you allow signs in the public right-of-way, you rr ust allow all signs. He would prefer that no signs be allowed in the public right-of- way. Chair/Tye did not propose to do away with signs in the public right-of-wa . In addition, if all signs were eliminated, he would want by -the -board c de enforcement. For the good of the businesses in Diamond Bar lie would not advocate banning signs in the public right-of-way. He felt that political signs in the public right-of-way were investments by candidates. He propo ed leaving the code as currently written. VC/Nolan said that it made sense to him to have spontaneous) monumE nts and real estate open house signs remain up for an appropri to period of time. In his opinion, limiting the amount of time for political signs levels the playing field. C/Nelson moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolu ion leaving the Code as currently written. Motion carried by the following Roll all vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT 6. NEW BUSINESS. COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS None 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: Nelson, Ruzicka, Tan ka, VC/Nolan None None 9. STAFF COMMENTSANFORMATIONAL ITEMS: As Listed 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As Listed As listed in the Agenda. AUUST 26, 2003 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Tye adjourned the meeting at 7:27 p.m. Respectfully S*mitted, James DeStef4 o Deputy City Mcina Attest: h I Chair' an Steve Tye