HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/28/2002MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 28, 2002
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California
91765.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Vice Chairman Tye led in the pledge of allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Steve Tye and Commissioner and
Jack Tanaka.
Commissioners Steve Nelson and Dan Nolan were excused.
Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Linda Smith, Development
Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCEIPUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 14, 2002.
C/Tanaka moved, VC/Tye seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting
of May 14, 2002 as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ordered with
C/Nelson and C/Nolan being absent.
5. F)LD BUSINESS: None
6• NEW BUSINESS:
6.1 Review of Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for
Conformity with the City's General Plan.
DCM/DeStefano presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission approve a resolution finding that the FY 2002-2003 Capital
Improvement Program is in conformance with the General Plan.
DCM/DeStefano responded to VC/Tye's questions.
There was no one present who wished to speak on this item.
MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
7.
VC/Tye moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to approve Resolution No. 2002-13 finding that
the FY 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is in conformance with the
City's General Plan. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2002-02 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020.A.)
is a request to construct a two-story single family residence on a vacant lot with a
basement, nine -car garage, porte cochere, decks and balconies totaling to
approximately 21,170 square feet. Additionally, the request includes a swimming
pool/spa, gazebo and retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of 6 feet within
the rear, side and front yards.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 22604 Ridge Line Road
(Lot 166 of Tract No. 30091)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Veneet K. Gupta
2359 Blue Haven Drive
Rowland Heights, CA 91748
APPLICANT: V.C. Dagam
1000 N. Regal Canyon Drive,
Walnut, CA 91789
DCM/DeStefano presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission
approval of Development Review No. 2002-02, Findings of Fact, and conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
Nancy Lyons, neighbor residing immediately downhill from the proposed
--tion wants assurance that the construction adheres to the CC&R's and
consru >
building code.
V.C. Dagam, architect, said his project follows all association CC&R's and building
codes.
1
MAY 28, 2002
PAGE 3
PLANNING COMMISSION
DCM/DeStefano explained that the city does not enforce association CC&R's.
However, this project received approval from "The Country Estates" Homeowners
Association, the city's guiding principle that determines whether applicant's are in
concert with "The Country Estates."
Nancy Lyons, 22536 Ridgeline Road, said she asked about the CC&R's because
there have been prior incidents where building plans received association approval
and subsequently, plans were changed before they were approved by the city. If
something negatively impacts her property during construction of this project, is there
something that can be done.
DCM/DeStefano said it would depend on the circumstances. Most often these are
private party matters. If the circumstance was related to a condition of approval, it
would then be an issue for the city and Planning Commission to address. The city
requires that applicants provide licenses, insurance, etc. to support the issuance of a
building permit.
Ms. Lyons said she is concerned because the project would be constructed over a
period of one year and that debris may float down into her backyard area and
swimming pool. She hoped that the construction foreman would take proper care to
ensure that debris would not float onto her property. She was also concerned that
grading would unearth rattlesnakes, gophers, ants, etc. that would invade her
property. She was pleased with the aesthetic qualities of the proposed project.
C/Tanaka moved, VC/Tye seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2002-02,
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion
approved by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Tanaka, VC/Tye,
NOES:/Ruzicka
COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMNIISSIONER& Nelson, Nolan
7.2 Development Review No. 99-09(1)(Tree Permit 2000-02(1) (pursuant to Code
Section 22.66.050.C.) is a request for a one year extension of time for a project
approved by the Planning Commission on April 11, 2000. The Planning
Commission approval allows the construction of a two-story, single-family residence,
of approximately 16,795 square feet, with a basement, balconies, porch, patios,
indoor swimming pool, and five -car garage. Additionally, the request includes
accessory structures: tennis court, rose garden with seating and trellis. The extension
of time, if approved, will allow the continuation of this entitlement until April 11,
2003.
MAY 289 2002 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER/
APPLICANT:
23622 Ridgeline Road
(Lot 88 of Tract No. 30091)
Diamond Bar, CA 91762
Christina Dang
2668 Highridge Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission
approval of Development Review No. 99-09 and Tree Permit 2000-02, Findings of
Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
VC/Tye asked why staff believes the applicant would be able to perform in one year
when this project has not commenced in the two years subsequent to approval.
DSA/Smith stated the applicant had a grading permit and experienced contract
negotiation problems with their architect and grading contractor. Most of the related
issues have been satisfactorily concluded.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Ruzicka closed the
public hearing.
C/Tanaka moved, VC/Tye seconded, to approve a one-year extension for
Development Review No. 99-09 and Tree Permit 2000-02, Findings of Fact, and
conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMNIISSIONERS: Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan
7.3 Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-06 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.10.030., Table
2-6 and 22.58.030) is a request to sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in
conjunction with the sale of motor fuel.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 206 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Equilon Enterprises, LLC
P.O. Box 4369
Houston, Texas 77210-4369
MAY 28, 2002
APPLICANT:
PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
Fauso Buchelli
206 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
DCM/DeStefano presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution.
Fauso Buchelli, owner, stated that he has owned the business for three and one-half
years. He and his staff are very responsible and have waited for a long period of time
to make this request based on customer demands.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
There being no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Ruzicka closed
the public hearing.
VC/Tye reported that the public hearing sign was not prominently posted at the site.
He would prefer that staff monitor these signs for better placement. He took
exception with the statement in staff's report that the sale of alcoholic beverages for
off-site consumption would serve a "public necessity." He felt this was an
inappropriate venue and was opposed to approving the CUP.
Chair/Ruzicka wanted to know why VC/Tye was concerned. Other dealers in the
area are selling alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption and this is a
convenience to the public.
VC/Tye moved to deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-06, Findings of Fact, and
conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. The motion died for lack of
second.
C/Tanaka moved, Chair/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No.
2002-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Tanaka, Chair/Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Tye
ABSENT: COMIVIISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS;
None Offered.
9• INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
None Offered.
MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As scheduled.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Ruzicka
adjourned the meeting at 8:07 p.m.
Res �Mly r Iiitted,
Jam s DeStefano
Deputy City Manager