The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/12/2000----•.-�.. ...• �-• � �-� ��- �� -�____ MINUTES OF OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Zirbes called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management Headquarters Building Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ruzicka. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, and Commissioners George Kuo, Steve Tye, and Joe Ruzicka. Absent: Chairman Steve Nelson. Also Present: David Meyer, Planning Consultant, Robert Pittman, Assistant City Attorney, Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner, Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant, Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the November 14, and 28, 2000, meeting. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve the minutes of November 14, and 28, 2000, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Tye, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 5. OLD BUSINESS: 5.1 Final Entry Gate Details for Tract No. 52267. On May 9, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 2000-02 subject to the review of the final entry gate details. j The applicant requests approval of the final entry gate details as shown on Exhibit "A" dated December 12, 2000. DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT ADDRESS: 700 Block of Diamond Bar Boulevard East side of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Tin Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER/ Pulte Home Corporation APPLICANT: 18401 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, CA 92612 DSA/Joe presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed final entry gate details as shown on Exhibit "A" dated December 12, 2000. Mr. Wright stated that the project conditions state that the traffic signal must be installed and operational prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit. The entry and traffic signal are proposed to be constructed at about the same time. It is likely that the gates will remain open until the project is sold out. He indicated that the applicant has addressed the Commission's goals and concerns with respect to the gate design. I F, Mr. Wright responded to VC/Zirbes that only the front entry will be accessible via remote control. ' The back entrance is for emergency access only. Dave Erickson, 24008 Highcrest Drive, asked why pedestrian gates are provided at the emergency exit. DSA/Joe stated that the original approval for the development has a condition that the secondary access gate is for emergency purposes only. The Commission may wish to consider whether the pedestrian access is appropriate for an emergency access gate. Mr. Wright indicated that Pulte feels the pedestrian gate at the back entrance would provide access to Pantera Park and Pantera School. The nearest home is approximately 150 to 200 feet from the emergency access. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve the proposed final entry gate details as shown on Exhibit "A" dated December 12, 2000. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes None Chair/Nelson 3Ft �u DECEMBER 12, 2000 a-, PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 5.2 Conditional Use Permit No. 99-4, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 99-9 originally approved on August 20, 1999, to allow for the operation of a restaurant with outdoor dining, the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages and entertainment (i.e., dancing with a DJ, Karaoke, guitarist, folk singer, and comedy nights) at the location referenced below. In accordance with Condition No. 50) of Resolution No. 99-19, a periodic review of the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Conditional Use Permit is required to assure compliance with conditions of approval and to consider whether to modify, add conditions as necessary, or revoke the permit. Municipal Code Section 22.76.020 authorizes the City to schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider modification or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit. (Continued from November 28, 2000.) PROJECT UNDER REVIEW: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: Platinum Restaurant 245 Gentle Springs Lane (Parcel 1, Parcel Map No. 15547) Diamond Bar-, CA 91765 SX Diamond Bar 259 Gentle Springs Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chris Pierce 245 Gentle Springs Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PC/Meyer presented staff's report: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the adoption of draft Resolution No. 2000 -XX and direct staff as appropriate. Patrick Munoz, speaking on behalf of the applicant, spoke about the differences between his proposed resolution and staff's proposed resolution. Vince Galloway, 300 S. Prospectors Road, said he would be inclined to accept staff's version of the resolution. Jeff Koontz, Diamond Bar Chamber of Commerce, said it would appear that it may be more beneficial from a business point of view to go forward with the applicant's resolution as long as it is not detrimental to the City. DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, C/Tye moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to continue this matter to January 9, 2001, in order to allow staff and the Planning Commissioners ample opportunity to review the applicant's version of the proposed resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMNIISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: None. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: 8.1 Development Review No. 2000-15 (pursuant to Code Section 2.48) is a request to construct a two- story, single-family residence, of approximately 9,471 square feet, with a basement, balconies, porch, a G, and a three -car, 1,546 square foot garage. Additionally, the request includes an accessory gazebo: structure containing approximately 400 square feet under roof. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 1819 Derringer Lane (Tract No. 24046, Lot 2) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Hardip Gill 100 Stagecoach Circle West Covina, CA 91791 Chary Dagam 100 Regal Canyon Drive Walnut, CA 91789 PC/Meyer presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, receive testimony in this matter and continue the public hearing for Development Review No. 2000-15 to January 23, 2001, allowing further time for the applicant to revise their grading plan. VC/Zirbes opened the public hearing. There was no on present who wished to speak on this matter. DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Tye moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to continue public hearing for Development Review No. 2000-15 to January 23, 2001. Motion carred by Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 8.2 Development Review No. 2000-21 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-21 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020 and 22.68.030(B)) is a request to construct an addition of approximately 7,174 square feet to an existing two-story public utility telephone switching facility of approximately 9,223 square feet. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is required for expansion to a legal non- conforming structure. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1041 South Grand Avenue Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Verizon One Verizon Way Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 APPLICANT: TDM Architects, Inc. 930 -Colorado Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90041 PC/Meyer presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the project be re -advertised for the January 9, 2001, Planning Commission meeting and that Negative Declaration No. 2000-07 be amended to reflect the appropriate square footage. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to direct staff to re -advertise the project for the January 9, 2001, Planning Commission meeting and that Negative Declaration No. 2000-07 be amended to reflect the appropriate square footage. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson IIiIJu1hii ion DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION 8.3 Development Review No. 2000-08/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-14 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56) is a request to construct a two-story, single-family residence, of approximately 16,192 square feet, with a basement, balconies, porch, and a five -car garage. Additionally, the request includes a tennis court and an enclosed swimming pool. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is a request to construct a detached, 1,000 square feet, two-bedroom guest house. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 1626 Derringer Lane (Tract No. 24046, Lot 20) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Razgo Lee and Pao Chin Tu Lee 22125 Birdseye Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Leslie Lippich Architects 4768 Park Granada, Suite 210 Calabasas, CA 91302 PC/Meyer presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-08, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-14, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the Resolution. Leslie Lippich, Architect, presented a revised rendering which indicates that the Porte Cochere has been moved back about 15 feet to create a larger setback and is no longer a drive -under area. This modification tends to reduce the massive appearance of the front entrance. He indicated to VC/Zirbes that he and the property owner read staff's report and concurs with the conditions of approval. VC/Zirbes opened the public hearing. Justin Ko said he is the architect for 1606 Derringer Lane, owned by Mr. Lin. Mr. Ko presented a copy of Mr. Lin's letter addressed to the homeowners association which outlined several concerns which included security fencing, water and height of the proposed structure. PC/Meyer explained that with respect to diversion of the water on the adjoining property at 1606 Derringer Lane, this property is required by Conditional (1) to comply with the grading requirements of the City's adopted Building Code which states that water cannot be diverted onto an adjoining property. The security fencing with respect to grading will be installed as part of the idwlwNi4,mllxrx.xmxlx.w.11.,.l,- DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION pedestrian protection requirements of the Building Code. The City's Development Code allows a maximum height of 35 feet above finished grade with which the proposed dwelling unit complies. Staff's assessment of this project is that it would not impact the existing views from the surrounding properties. Mr. Lippich stated that both properties were graded together. Alterations to Mr. Lin's property by Mr. Lin was to divert some of the water off of his property. When construction is completed, there will be subsurface drainage and a masonry wall on the property line. During construction, the entire project will be fenced. Great effort was taken to ensure that this structure fit into the envelope by stepping the building back and down to follow the downhill slope. VC/Zirbes closed the public hearing. C/Ruzicka moved to approve Development Review No. 2000-08, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-14, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. VC/Zirbes asked that Condition (g) on page 5 be amended as follows: That "maid's quarters" be replaced with "secondary unit" for consistency and that Condition (h) be added (with all remaining conditions renumbered) to read as follows: "The garage area in the secondary unit shall not be altered in any way in the future." C/Ruzicka modified his motion to include VC/Zirbes' recommendations. C/Kuo seconded the modified motion. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Tye asked if there is some way to accommodate a business owner or homeowner so that public hearing signs do not impair their living and business quality. He believes that when signs remain at a location for an extended period of time they lose their effectiveness. 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects - as noted. DECEMBER 12, 2000 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the Agenda. PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Vice Chairman Zirbes adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. f Attest: Vice Chairman, Bob Zirbes t i, I' t j e `s Respectfully Submitted, Ja s DeStefano Deputy City Manager