HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/24/2000MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 24, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management
Headquarters Building Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ruzicka.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Nelson Vice Chairman Bob Zirhes_ and Cnmmicsinnenz
George Kuo, Steve Tye, and Joe Ruzicka.
Also Present: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager, Ann Lungu, Associate Planner,
Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, Linda Smith, Development
Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Assistant.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the October 10, 2000, meeting.
C/Ruzicka moved, VC/Zirhes seconded, to approve the minutes of October 10, 2000, as
submitted. Motion carried -by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirhes,
Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None -
OCTOBER 24, 2000
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
7.1 Development Review No. 2000-11, Tree Permit No. 2000-03, Minor Conditional Use
Permit No. 2000-06, and Minor Variance No. 2000-06 (pursuant to Code Sections
22.48.020, 22.38.020, 22.56.020, 22.30.080 and 22.52.020) are requests to construct a three
story (two stories and a basement) single family residence with a five car garage, decks and
balconies totaling to approximately 10,460 square feet. The request also includes a
swimming pool, two spas, and rear retaining walls with a maximum six-foot exposed
height. Development Review requires site design and architectural review. Tree Permit
is required for the removal and replacements of oak and walnut trees. Minor Variance is
required for the requested 20 percent reduction in the required front yard setback. Minor
Conditional Use Permit is required for a greater driveway width than permitted by code.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 23415 Pleasant Meadow Road
(Lot 22 of Tract No. 23483)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROJECT OWNER: Surinder Bhogal
9866 Houghton Avenue
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
APPLICANT: Basant Sachdeva
1738 East Meats Avenue
Orange, CA 92865
AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review No. 2000-11, Tree Permit No. 2000-03, Minor Conditional
Use Permit No. 2000-06, and Minor Variance No. 2000-06, Findings of Fact, and
conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution.
C/Tye asked if it would present a burden to the applicant to keep the front yard setback at
30 feet. He reiterated his concern about the massive appearance of structures that are set
close to city streets.
AssocP/Lungu explained that staff believes a 24 foot front yard setback would help to
preserve more of the walnut and oak trees. In addition, Pleasant Meadow is a cul-de-sac
and does not present the same effect on passing motorists as Ridgeline Drive presents and
the front of the house is one story only.
AssocP/Lungu explained to the Commission that she is comfortable with the Applicant's
Arborist's report because he tagged the trees.
OCTOBER 24, 2000 PAGE'3 PLANNING COMMISSION
Surinder Bhogal, property owner, said that when he purchased the property it had not been
cleaned up for some period of time. Los Angeles County gave notice to clean the lot
because it was a fire hazard. He engaged maintenance workers to clear the land and
through a misunderstanding, the workers cut five trees without the required permit. In
addition, he had to move at least 20 trees before he could begin construction of the house.
His intention was not to cut the trees without pulling a permit. He said he is concerned
about the potential donation cost of $22,000 as a result of the lost trees and asked the
Planning Commission to consider a reduction in the dollar amount and number of tree of
the donation and allow him to plant additional trees on his property.
Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing.
Cassandra McGinnis, 23427 Pleasant Meadow Road, said that workers were on the
applicant's property attempting to cut down a very large oak tree when they were stopped.
After a time, they returned and leveled the tree. On October 10, 2000, with no grading
permit in place, a bulldozer began moving earth on the applicant's lot. She presented
photographic evidence to the Planning Commission which to her, indicated more activity
than merely weed abatement. If the grading and building continue with the same disregard
for regulations the safety of her adjoining lot and home may be in question. She is
!� concerned about the stability of the hill on which she resides and about improper water
runoff and the blockage of the ravine below her home. She asked what measures are in
place to insure compliance with the authorized variances. She is particularly concerned
that her property is not compromised during construction of the proposed project.
Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.
AssocP/Lungu explained- to Ms. McGinnis that the hydrology report indicates that the
runoff from the proposed project would be insignificant. During the construction process
inspectors, engineers and staff members are present to insure compliance.
ICM/DeStefano stated that if the Planning Commission approves this project it will set the
location for the house's foundation. When the foundation set, the City's Building and
Safety staff conducts a foundation inspection before the pouring of concrete can take place.
During this inspection, staff measures the setbacks to make certain that the applicant is in
conformity with the project's approval.
AssocP/Lungu responded to Chair/Nelson that according to Leighton & Assoc., the
applicant has gone about discing in a very unusual way by cutting himself a path.
ICM/DeStefano indicated to C/Tye that he has not visited the site. The photographs
presented by Ms. McGinnis indicate that "unusual" grubbing may have been a kind term.
r The photographs indicate an aggressive clearing and rubbing may have occurred. The
OCTOBER 24, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
landscape has been disturbed and cannot be replaced and in reality, the City is forced to
move forward with this consideration. The applicant may believe that it was done
appropriately but the applicant needs to understand that if the project is to proceed they will
have to comply with the City's Codes and environmental laws.
Chair/Nelson re -opened the public hearing.
Surinder Bhogal, property owner, explained that in order to complete his project he needed
fill which was offered to him free of charge by a third party. He felt that he needed to take
4 advantage of the situation and pulled permits from the City. The photographs presented by
Ms. McGinnis depict a cut at the front of the property which allowed trucks access to the
property for purposes of stockpiling the dirt. No grading operations have begun.
II
'9
Ms. McGinnis stated that when she spoke with the gentleman who was doing the
bulldozing he indicated to her that he was under the impression that the applicant had a
j_ grading permit. She believes that if the project proceeds according to the City's Codes, it
should work. However, the property owner is taking short cuts.
Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.
VC/Zirbes said that while he shares Ms. McGinnis' concerns about how projects are
completed, he is very confident that the City's staff will monitor the situation and make
certain that the applicant complies. He proposed that Condition (h) on page 1 I be modified
to the following: That the five trees that were removed prior to the applicant obtaining a
permit be replaced with 24 inch box trees at a 6:1 ratio; and 24 inch box size at a 3:1 ratio
for the remaining trees for a total amount of 48 trees; and the replacement mitigation shall
be in the form of a donation to the City's Tree Replacement Fund — the donation shall
include the cost of the replacement trees in a 24 inch box size at $145 each, planting cost
at $296 each, and tree maintenance costs at $120 per tree per year for five years. Placement
of trees on the applicant's property will be done under the supervision of the Arborist and
will be subject to the City's monitoring program for five (5) years.
VC/Zirbes moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-11,
Tree Permit No. 2000-03, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-06, and Minor Variance
No. 2000-06.
I,
C/Kuo asked that the motion be amended to direct staff to verify the 40 pound balcony live
load indicated in Condition (u) on Page 13. The maker of the motion and the seconder
i' agreed to the amendment. Motion approved by the following Roll Call vote:
�r
lih
E
OCTOBER 24, 2000
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
- � i->ww.��Ir�.wmIx�YM1eli.J�.Lr Yx.4d�4u6��6 -
PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes,
Chair/Nelson
None
None
7.2 Development Review No. 2000-16, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-15, Minor
Variance No. 2000-17 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020 (A)(1), 22.56.020 and
22.52.020 (B)) is a request to construct an approximately 12,340 square foot two-story
single-family residence with two garages for five cars, pool/spa, gazebo, and tennis court.
A Minor Conditional use Permit is required to process the circular driveway. The Minor
Variance is a request to decrease the rear yard setback by 20 percent.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2521 Braided Mane Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNERS: Ton -Dei Chiu
1432 E. Peppertree Drive
La Habra Heights, CA 90631
APPLICANT: Tein Wang
801 S. Garfield Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91801
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review No. 2000-19, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval,
as listed within the resolution.
Tein Wang, project architect, explained how the project plans were drawn under the
previous City Code and why the applicant is requesting a minor variance.
Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Nelson closed the public
hearing.
VC/Zirbes moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-16,
Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-15, Minor Variance No. 2000-17, Findings of
Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
OCTOBER 24, 2000
8.
9.
PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes,
Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
C/Tye left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
7.3 Development Review No. 2000-19 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020) is a request to
remodel and add approximately 4,607 square feet to an existing 3,110 square foot, two
story single family residence with a three car garage located within "The Country Estates."
The request includes a new deck.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 23634 Ridgeline Road
(Lot 87, Tract No. 30091)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER/ Sunil Kohli -
APPLICANT: 23634 Ridgeline Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765;j,
DSA/Joe presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review No. 2000-19, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval,
as listed within the resolution.
Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Nelson closed the public
hearing.
C/Ruzicka moved, VC/Zirbes seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-19,
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. Motion
approved by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tye
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: None offered.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
OCTOBER 24, 2000 PAG -E'7 PLANNING COMMISSION
9.2 Announcements.
ICM/DeStefano reported that City Manager Terrence Belanger resigned his position in
Diamond Bar to accept the City Manager position with the City of Yorba Linda.
ICM/DeStefano has been appointed Interim City Manager by the City Council. The City
is currently undergoing recruitment to fill the position which will take about five or six
months. During this time ICM/DeStefano will continue to direct the City's Planning
Division. The City will consider hiring a planning consultant(s) to take up the slack with
staff positions that will be temporarily vacated.
ICM/DeStefano stated that JCL's Project for Tracts 48487 and 50314 off of Windmill
Drive located within "The Country Estates" that was approved about five years ago by the
Planning Commission and two years ago by the City Council is now entering its
construction phase.
ICM/DeStefano reported that the City of Industry's Industry East 425 acre project has
entered its grading phase. The project is visible from Grand Avenue between Valley
Boulevard and the SR 60 and the Honda Dealership. The project has received approval for
nine of the 33 proposed buildings.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Nelson adjourned
the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
Res ectfully Sub 'tted,
James DeStefano
Interim City Manager
Attest:
Ch rman Steve Nelson