Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/19/1997- - - - - - - - . , - 11 11i „hw 11 � , -,.-1,141"1�'-...._r -- -- ------ _- -- - -- - - - - � - --- - -- ---- MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 19, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management Board Hearing Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Robert Zirbes. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad, Commissioners Goldenberg and McManus Absent: Commissioner Fong Also Present: Acting Planning Commission Secretary Catherine Johnson and Planning Technician Susan Cole. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1.. Minutes of August 5, 1997. C/Goldenberg moved, C/McManus seconded, to approve the minutes of August 5, 1997 as presented. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS - None CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Draft Development Code (Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 97-1) Article III - Site Planning and General Development Regulations. Mr. Pflugrath continued with Article III presentation for the Chapter entitled Noise Control On Page III -60. Mr. Pflugrath corrected the third line of 3. Standard No. 3 on Page III -64 to read: "shall be the applicable noise level from Subsection A, plus 10 (instead of 20) dB; or, etc. ter, Mr. Pflugrath responded that Table 3 Exterior Noise Standards on Page III -64 complies with the City's General Plan guidelines. Mr. Pflugrath indicated CNEL at the end of C. Residential design requirements 1. on Page III -66 is,stricken so that the paragraph ends following 40 dBA. AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION a..li Steve Tye asked how noise levels are measured on!`.'$;` residential properties that back up to industrial properties. Mr. Pflugrath responded that the noise level for residential would be :easured according to the criteria for Noise Zone II (Page III -66) within the boundaries; of the residential property. SP/Johnson responded' to Bob Zirbes that the City's ambient noise level is called out in the General Plan. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS (Pages III -72 through III -92) C/McManus asked how Item C. Vehicles for sale on Page III -73 can be enforced without a code enforcement officer being available on weekends. C/Goldenberg asked if a residential room addition can be completed if the unit suffers from non -conforming parking. SP/Johnson explained that if a violation was uncovered upon inspection, the building permit would not be approved. It is illegal to remove parking (See B. Parking and loading to be unrestricted on, Page III -73). Mr. Pflugrath explained that, room addition building permits are procedural matters for City staff's review and approval. Chair/Ruzicka stated that C/Goldenberg's concern warrants more definitive language within the code. This is a violation that occurs within the City with some. frequency. Mr. Pflugrath referred the Commission to D. Nonconforming status on Page III -73 and suggested that a section) be added for single family residential. Chair/Ruzicka responded to Mr. Pflugrath that a thorough inspection should be triggered by any building permit request. Chair/Ruzicka stated his concerns regarding the lack of sufficient on-site parking at Diamond Bar High School. Mr. Pflugrath responded that most school district's do not provide the correct number of parking spaces. IHe suggested signage be ;laced on residential streets to curb the parking. AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Goldenberg asked that "as provided in Table XX on Page XX" be added to Paragraph G. Company-owned vehicles on Page III -74 for clarification. Regarding VC/Schad's concern regarding parking availability for the Heritage Park Community Center, Mr. Pflugrath referred the Commission to Performance theaters, meeting halls and membership organizations in Table 3-xx on Page III -77. C/Goldenberg asked that "Bowling alleys" be changed to "Bowling centers" in Table 3-xx on Page III -76. C/Goldenberg asked that a definition be provided for "ancillary uses". (See Table 3-xx on Page III -76. - e.g.) C/Goldenberg stated he believes the Code should incorporate "guest parking" for new hillside development in addition to the required parking. Mr. Pflugrath suggested that language be provided to indicate that parking will be required "at the discretion of the Director". C/Goldenberg suggested the City consider offering "in lieu fees" to acquire public parking area be included in Reduction of Off -Street Parking Requirements for Shared Use on Page III -81. C/Goldenberg reiterated his concerns regarding concreting of single family residential front yard areas. (See Page III -82). He stated he believes the code should include an acceptable standard. C/Goldenberg recommended that with respect to Page III - 85, the landscaping should define the ingress and egress points of the driveway. Mr. Pflugrath responded to Chair/Ruzicka that property owners who have created additional parking by concreting front yard areas may be in violation of the current code. Responding to Chair/Ruzicka, Mr. Pflugrath stated he believes Real Estate laws require disclosure of non- conforming situations upon listing of the property for sale. C/McManus asked if whether a fence that has been illegally allowed to stand on a property for a certain period of time becomes the property of the current property owner. Mr. Pflugrath responded that the judicial system may find that it is unreasonable for a City requires a building AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSIION owner to correct a situation that has been in place for a number of years. Mr. Pflugrath indicated to Chair/Ruzicka that he will research the situation and advise the Commission. C/Goldenberg stated that enforcement depends on the philosophy of'the City Council. C/Fong arrived at 7:15 p.m. Chair/Ruzicka stated that if a future City Council chooses to be more proactive, the Development Code will provide the vehicle. Mr. Pflugrath referred the Commission to E. Driveway width and length on Page III -89 in response to C/Goldenberg's concerns regarding concreting of single family residential front yard areas. He indicated that he has noted future discussion of 1. Circular drives and 2. driveway width maximums. C/Goldenberg recommended that "five" feet be changed,to "seven" feet in the third line of 6. perimeter parking lot landscaping a. Adjacent to streets to allow two feet for bumper overhang. The Commission concurred. VC/Schad stated that some of the City's major grocery stores place grocery .carts on sidewalk areas immediately adjacent to parking areas which creates a pedestrian hazard. He asked if the code can provide for adequate walkways. Mr. Pflugrath indicated that in order to implement the code, compliance would be required at the time of. addition or remodel on a case by case basis. Compliance could not be required on a retroactive basis. He indicated that grocery markets are required by ADA and Fire Code to maintain a clear -four foot access way. C/Goldenberg recommended "When provided," be added to the beginning . of the last sentence under M. Wheel stops/curbing on Page IiI-88 so that the sentence reads: "When provided, wheel stops shall be placed to allow for two feet of vehicle overhang area within the dimension,of the parking space." Mr. Pflugrath stated E. Clearance from obstruction will be renumbered "F." and F. Traffic safety,sight'area will be renumbered "G." on Page 111-89. 0 C/Goldenberg stated that the Fire Department requires driveways for -multi -family uses with more than six units to have a minimum paved width of 1126" feet instead of AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION 1124" feet (see e. driveway width and length, 2. multi- family uses. b. on Page III -89. VC/Schad recommended location requirements be added to B. Bicycle parking design;, and devices a. on Page III -90. Craig Clute commented that with respect to dBa levels, CalTrans uses a "b" weighted scale. The City uses an "a" weighted scale. Mr. Pflugrath stated that he is unaware of any zoning document that contains other than an "a" weight scale. Mr. Clute stated his concerns regarding possible code violations with respect to business uses on Golden Springs Drive east of the Brea Canyon Road intersection. Tom VanWinkle commented that the ingress/egress for Coco's Restaurant area west of Brea Canyon Road on Golden Springs Drive presents a safety hazard. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Page III -93 and III -94). T Mr. Pflugrath presented the Chapter entitled Planned Development Standards. k. RECESS: Chair/Ruzicka recesse4 the meeting at 7:50 p.m. RECONVENE: Chair/Ruzicka reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS (Page III -95 through III -105) Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/McManus that personal use vehicles are not covered under C. Motor vehicle parking on Page III -97. In response to Chair/Ruzicka, Mr. Pflugrath indicated this community responds on a complaint basis only. Older communities tend to have strict and active code enforcement and use uniformed officers that carry badges and have citation authority. C/Fong asked that e.g. dead branches, dead palm fronds, dead lawns, etc. be added at the end of paragraph E. Landscape maintenance on Page III -97. Chair/Ruzicka requested the "exit" be corrected to "exist" at the beginning of line three under A. Public r, nuisance and nuisances per se 2. Written notice on Page III -100. Craig Clute commented that it is unfortunate the City is on a reactive basis with respect to code enforcement. I G AUGUST 14 1997 i PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMIS SOON CA/Jenkins Mr. Pflugrath responded to Mr. Clute that this d", Development Code does not address on street parking because it is in the public right-of-way. C/McManus stated although the proposed Development Code offers more authority the City is reactive rather than proactive, C/Fong stated his concerns regarding the proliferation of multi-ethnic commercial signage (See Page III -112). He indicated he would like to see that signage is predominately English. Mr. Pflugrath referred C/Fong to E. Sign copy on page III -112. C/Goldenberg stated that signs may not be legally restricted for aesthetic reasons. The legal basis for the Health and Safety Ordinance and Development Code should be indicated. Mr. Pflugrath indicated he will 'speak with CA/Jenkins regarding this matter and advise the Commission. Chair/Ruzicka confirmed to Mr. Pflugrath that if there is no legal conflict, the Commission wishes a 50 percent or more English reference contained within the code. VC/Schad requested that Item 6. under D. Illumination'of signs indicate "Par type lamps are safe for exterior use". SP/Johnson indicated that DCM/DeStefano recommended all Development Code defi.ii_tions be placed in Article VII for consistency. Following discussion, the Commission concurred to place the Development Code definitions within Chapter VII.' C/Goldenberg suggested that A. Permanent signs with no size limitation be changed to "A. Permanent signs without specific size limitation under Exemptions From Sign Permits on Page III -113. Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/McManus that B. Permanent signs limited by maximum size 6. on Page III -114 should include "in area" in the last sentence so that it reads: "These signs shall not exceed four square feet in area and five feet in height; and". C/McManus asked for a definition of "Pole -mounted signs"`''` within Article VII (See N. on Page III -118). AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 7 r, PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/Goldenberg that W. on Page III -118 refers to commercial. Residential lighting can be included in Property Maintenance - Single or multiple family residential. He indicated he will confer with the City Attorney regarding this matter. C/McManus asked that "except those classified as seasonal decorations" be stricken from the last sentence of B. Amortization 1. Temporary signs a. 90 days so that the sentence reads: "Paper, cloth and cardboard signs, banners, balloons, flags, bunting, portable signs, moving, flashing and scintillating signs, and other similar signs." C/Goldenberg suggested that B. Freestanding signs be changed to read: B. Freestanding monument signs on Page III -120. An extensive discussion was conducted with respect to Item d. under 2. Temporary advertising/promotional signs and devices and the need for increased enforcement. Mr. Pflugrath recommended that staff's report to the City Council include enforcement concerns expressed by Commissioners. VC/Schad recommended that Prohibited Signs include tree mounted signs (See Pages III -118 and 119). C/Goldenberg requested that the size of letters and numbers be included in Table 3-X SIGN STANDARDS BY ZONING DISTRICT on Page III -125. Mr. Pflugrath recommended this information be included on Page III -114 under B. Permanent signs limited by maximum size 1 with reference to the Code section. Mr. Pflugrath responded to Mr. Clute that he believes that regulation of temporary signage could result in a code enforcement nightmare. In his opinion, the code should address permanent signage. He explained that there are two provisions for signage: overall building sign area based upon two square feet per lineal front footage of the building and window signs no more than 25 percent of the total window area.. Mr. Pflugrath indicated to Mr. Clute that curb painting is regulated by the City's Public Works Department. SP/Johnson explained the City's Temporary Sign process to Mr. Clute. Chair/Ruzicka explained to Mr. VanWinkle that the Commission's objective is to author a uniform development AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION code of which the City can be proud. Issues of specific problems and their enforcement are not being discussed tonight because it is not tonight's goal. As a result of discussion, potential problems are brought to the attention of the staff for ,further consideration. l Bob Zirbes suggested that 1 space for each 100 sq. ft. of gross floor area be changed to "1 space for each 5Q qq. ft. of floor area for' Restaurants, fast food in Table 3 - XX on Page III -79 (middle of page). Mr. Pflugrath indicated that Mr. Zirbes' recommendation would be at the low end of the scale. Mr. Zirbes recommended that Table 3 -XX Minimum Parking Stall and Lot Dimensions be changed to indicate a length of 22 feet including bumper overhang instead of 18 feet, and that the width be increased to ,- or IQ feet, for parking lots that experience frequent turnover and not for office building parking lots. SP/Johnson responded to Mr. Zirbes that the recommendation is a compromise to incorporate the elimination of compact parking spaces within the City. In addition, the intent of the provision is to avoid non- conformity in creating additional spaces within an existing parking lot. Mr. Zirbes, referring to Item G. Maintenance of common areas 3., suggested including common language to require the developer to ,assist homeowners to form their own association upon completion or sale of a -certain number of units. Mr. Zirbes recommended that language be included in the CC&R's to address view obstructing vegetation. Mr. Zirbes asked for a definition of "cons iderable":as indicated in the first sentence of Public Nuisance under Definitions on Page III -95. He said he believes "one person" could be considerable and he indicated he would like to recommend that "considerable" be stricken from the sentence. Mr. Pflugrath indicated he would consult the State Code for language. Mr. Zirbes asked that "exterior dilapidated conditions" be defined (See C. Building maintenance on Page III -96 and other areas of the proposed code). Mr. Pflugrath recommended that a general definition''be included on Page III -95. _.-u '4, .11 T :16l, AUGUST 19, 1997 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Fong returned to the meeting at 10:15 p.m. Mr. Zirbes recommended that "forces" be changed to "personnel" in the fifth line of b. Removal of the dangerous condition(s) so that the line reads: "...isolate the dangerous condition(s), with the use of City personnel or a contractor retained..." Mr. Zirbes asked for discussion of "Garage Sale" within the code. Mr. Pflugrath recommended the addition of f. Garage sale signs with notation for permitted size, hours and placement under C. Temporary signs limited by size and period of display on Page III -115. Mr. Zirbes stated that future City Councils may chose to be proactive. The Commission needs to provide the Council with appropriate codes and language to allow enforcement. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As preGented in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. August 26, 1997 in the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium. Attest: i Jpe Ru'icka Chairma Respectfully Submitted, Catherine Johnson Acting Secretary