HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/12/1996CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 12, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Istik called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. at the South
Coast Air Quality Management District Hearing Room, 21865 East
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by C/Tamaya.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners: Chair/Istik, Vice Chair Leonard,
Commissioners Nice, Tamaya, and Virginkar
Staff: Director of Public Works George Wentz, Deputy
Director of Public Works David Liu; Assistant
Engineer Rose Manela; Administrative
Assistant Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings;
and Recording Secretary Carol Dennis
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A. Minutes of July 25, 1996. C/Nice made a motion,
seconded by C/Tamaya, to approve the minutes of
July 25, 1996 as presented. The motion was
approved 4-0-1 with C/Virginkar abstaining.
B. Minutes of August 1, 1996. C/Tamaya made a
motion, seconded by VC/Leonard, to approve the
minutes of August 1, 1996 as presented. Without
objections, the motion was so ordered.
C. Minutes of August 8, 1996. C/Virginkar made a
motion, seconded by C/Nice to approve the minutes
of August 8, 1996 as presented. The motion was
approved 4-0-1 with C/Tamaya abstaining.
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Oscar Law, 21511 Pathfinder Road, asked for curbs and
sidewalks on Brea Canyon Road and for diagonal parking
on Brea Canyon Road in front of Heritage Park.
September 12, 1996 Page 2 TAT Commission
DDPW/Liu responded to Chair/Istik that Brea Canyon Road
design discussion is scheduled for the October 10, 1996
Traffic and Transportation Commission agenda.
Responding to Mr. Law, DPW Wentz stated that Traffic
and Transportation Commission recommendations regarding
Brea Canyon Road vehicle parking changes would be
forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Brea
Canyon Road design is scheduled for Fiscal Year 1996-
1997.
Grace MacBride, 435 Willapa Lane, asked how many other
residential areas in the City, in addition to her
street, have double yellow center lines.
Chair/Istik responded to Ms. MacBride that the Standard
of Practice for installation of centerline striping for
residential streets in the City is a scheduled agenda
item for this meeting.
Ms. MacBride stated she feels centerline striping ruins
the ambiance of the neighborhood. She indicated
several of her neighbors have complained about the
striping. She further stated she is opposed to
centerline striping on Sunset Crossing Road.
Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Drive, stated he is in
favor of centerline striping under the SR 60 at Sunset
Crossing Road.
Clyde Hennessy, 22702 Sunset Crossing Road, stated his
concerns about the speeding vehicles on Sunset Crossing
Road and asked for striping, reduction in speed, stop
signs and proper signage to indicate truck weight
limits and that the street dead ends.
Chair/Istik responded to Mr. Hennessy that cul-de-
sacing of Sunset Crossing Road is planned. In
addition, a discussion to narrow the street and conduct
a speed survey is pending.
Mr. Hennessy asked the City to bypass the speed survey
and immediately reduce the speed limit on Sunset
Crossing Road.
DPW/Wentz responded to Chair/Istik that the Sunset
Crossing Road discussion is scheduled for the October
September 12, 1996 Page 3 T&T Commission
10, 1996 Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting.
Joe Larutta, 2546 Sunbright Drive, stated that eight
out of ten vehicles do not acknowledge the stop sign on
Sunbright Drive at Fountain Springs Road.
Phillip Kuida, 22635 Dry Creek Road, asked why the
freeway vehicles have right-of-way over the vehicles on
City streets exiting the SR 60 westbound offramp at
Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Chair/Istik referred Mr. Kyle to CalTrans which has
jurisdiction over freeway exit traffic flow.
Ron Collosi, 109 N. Prospectors Road, stated that many
vehicles disregard the three stop signs on his street
between Sunset Crossing Road and Golden Springs Drive.
He asked that the City reconsider installation of speed
bumps.
Debbie O'Connor, 23725 Bower Cascade Place, stated that
yesterday she observed a semi -truck with two trailers
made an illegal U-turn in the intersection of Sunset
Crossing Road and Del Sol Lane with school children
present on all four street corners. Today, she
observed three cars make U-turns at the same corner
just prior to school hours. She reiterated the need
for law enforcement at local school sites. She
requested the City contact the construction company and
advise them of the safety concerns.
Shanna Garno, 440 N. Del Sol Lane, stated she is very
concerned about the safety of the children in the area
of Del Sol Lane and Sunset Crossing Road. She
suggested a traffic signal in lieu of the stop sign at
the intersection.
Bob Zerbes, 2141 Tierra Loma Drive, stated he feels the
Northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard left turn signal
illumination at Pathfinder Road is inconsistent and
confusing, and presents a safety hazard.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. overnight parking of recreational/commercial
I vehicles on City of Diamond Bar public streets.
September 12, 1996 Page 4 TAT Commission
DDPW/Liu read the staff report into the record. Staff
recommends that the Traffic and Transportation
Commission receive public testimony, discuss, and
forward a recommendation to the City Council.
Chair/Istik asked for public testimony.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Road, requested that
all of his comments be submitted to the City Clerk
verbatim. He referred the Commission to the City's
Municipal Code and the California Motor Vehicle Code
books. He stated he is angry to have to appear before
the Commission once again regarding an item that has
been previously tabled. He indicated staff's report is
incorrect when it states that at the October, 1991
meeting, several Diamond Bar residents opposed
overnight parking. He further stated that at the first
meeting in 1991, there were 300 people in attendance at
the County of Los Angeles Library. In addition, he
submitted a petition with 300 signatures and does not
understand how staff considers this number to be a few
people. He indicated the Page 2 staff statement that
the interim City Attorney inadvertently omitted the
County's 1130 minute parking between the hours of 2:00
a.m. and 4:00 a.m, from the ordinance is incorrect. He
referred the Commission to the meeting tape which
clearly states the motion is not to enforce the 2:00
a.m. to 4:00 a.m. restriction.
Mr. Rumpilla, referring to sections of the Vehicle.
Code, asked for enforcement of the current laws
regarding recreational and commercial vehicle parking.
He stated that in his opinion, no additional laws are
needed.
Mr. Rumpilla asked that his letter and letters in
opposition to restrictions on overnight parking from
the following citizens be filed with the City Clerk:
Tom,Ortiz, Tom Van Winkle, Alexandria French, Jeff and
Deena Ryan, Deanna Hoy, and Mike Goldenberg. These
letters are available for review at City Hall.
Chair/Istik observed that approximately 28 people in
the audience indicated by show of hands that in
principle, they agree with Mr. Rumpilla's position on
overnight parking of recreational and commercial
vehicles.
September 12, 1996 Page 5
T&T Commission
Debbie O'Connor stated that if the City stripes
residential streets, recreational vehicles should not
be permitted to park on streets for safety reasons.
Owners moving their vehicles a short distance to
eradicate the enforcement markings does not solve the
problem. Vehicles should be moved away from the
problem area.
Don Gravdahl stated that in two previous instances, the
Traffic and Transportation Commission voted to table
the overnight parking on City streets item and
recommendations were forwarded to the City Council. He
acknowledged that citizens are breaking the laws that
are on the books. He suggested that 90 percent of the
street parking problems could be remedied by
enforcement of the current laws. He asked the
Commission to recommend enforcement of the existing
laws to the City Council.
Oscar Law stated he participated in writing the City's
Property Maintenance Ordinance. He does not want the
City to stop citizens from earning a living by taking
away their ability to park their commercial vehicle on
the City street at night.
Barbara Clannon, 3543 Falcon Ridge Road, agrees the
Vehicle Code should be enforced as written. People
have a right to make a living. However, some
neighborhood CC&R's restrict commercial vehicle parking
on City streets.
Joe Larutta stated that in his opinion, some City
streets lend themselves to street parking and some
streets do not. He asked that the City enforce the
current laws and CC&R's.
Ron Collosi indicated his wife parks a commercial
mobile dentistry vehicle on the street in front of
their house at night and on the weekends. It is
necessary that the vehicle be placed on leveling jacks
when parked. He stated he spoke with his neighbors to
determine if they had a problem with the arrangement.
He further stated that they have attempted to locate a
commercial parking space. However, there is no public
storage facility that can accommodate the necessary
hours of use. The vehicle cannot be parked in the City
of Walnut business lot at night because there is no
September 12, 1996 Page 6 T&T Commission
security.
Greg Cullen, 1118 Moonlight Summit Drive, stated he
attended the 1991 meeting held at the City Library. He
believes that the City Council tabled the item because
it had received only three letters of complaint
regarding recreational vehicles parked on City streets.
He recalls that approximately ninety-nine percent of
the people present at the 1991 meeting favored the
current regulations. He indicated he believes he has a
right to park his vehicles on City streets. He would
prefer the City focus on maintaining clean streets
instead of trying to keep the recreational vehicles off
of the streets at night.
Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Drive, asked the Traffic
and Transportation Commission to table the overnight
parking issue and recommend to the City Council that
the City enforce the current laws.
Clyde Hennessy, 22702 Sunset Crossing Road, concurred
with Frank Dursa and Oscar Law that there should be no
ban on overnight parking on City streets.
Royal Wilkes, 2702 George Lane, stated the City does
not need more laws - just enforce what's on the books.
Lydia Plunk, 1522 Deerfoot Drive, asked the Commission
to consider recommending creation of an educational
booklet for the citizens and the Sheriff's Department.
Don Fisher, 465 Bregante Drive, favors enforcement of
the existing laws. He indicated that although he owns
a 27 foot commercial truck and a 48 foot travel
trailer, he refuses to park them on the street out of
respect for his neighbors. He pays for vehicle storage
at a public facility. He stated that he believes a
street parked recreational vehicle is against the
letter of the law. A City street is a public right-of-
way, not a private area.
Shanna Garno stated she believes that the law
enforcement agencies have enough to do handling crime.
She wants to continue parking her recreational vehicle �.
on the street in front of her home.
Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Road, supports
September 12, 1996 Page 7 T&T Commission
safer, cleaner, calmer neighborhood streets. Parked
cars, trucks and recreational vehicles are the
neighborhood traffic chokers. He indicated he favors a
person's right to park their vehicles on their property
as long as it is within the Property Maintenance
Ordinance limitations. If the City revises overnight
parking, it needs to revisit the Property Maintenance
Ordinance. He further indicated he favors using the
current laws to mitigate safety concerns when
recreational vehicles are connected to household
wiring.
RECESS: Chair/Istik recessed the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
RECONVENE: Chair/Istik reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to C/Tamaya that the Sheriff's
Department currently enforces "No Overnight Parking"
Ordinances for the cities of San Dimas and Walnut.
Deputies issue citations to offenders during the
appropriate hours of the morning. San Dimas previously
employed a Parking Patrol Officer to enforce the
Overnight Parking Ordinance. He indicated the deputies
routinely rotate enforcement in different area of the
cities. Diamond Bar is approximately the size of San
Dimas and Walnut combined. Diamond Bar citizens are
used to parking on the City's streets overnight. If a
ban is invoked, additional enforcement will be required
at the onset. If the Sheriff's Department receives a
call regarding a potential parking violation, a unit is
dispatched to the location. The offending vehicle's
tires will be marked and tagged. If the vehicle is
still in the same location at the end of the 72 hour
period, it will be stored. The ordinance works for
abandoned vehicles. It does not work well to prevent
people from storing their vehicles on the street. He
estimated that the Sheriff's Department responds to
approximately six to twelve parking violation calls per
month.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to C/Nice that the Sheriff's
Department responds to violations that occur on
residential street.
Responding to VC/Leonard, DDPW/Liu stated that
applicable provisions of Title 10 of the Municipal Code
are included in the Commission packets.
September 12, 1996
Page s
T&T Commission
Chair/Istik stated he believes discussion is valuable.
He cited a Walnut Times article and indicated that some
cities have gone so far as to disallow recreational
storage in driveways. In 1970 the City of Walnut
modified its home building policies to allow 12 foot
side yard setbacks to accommodate recreational vehicle
storage. He further stated that this item is being
discussed as a result of concern regarding use of
residential streets for long term recreational and
commercial vehicle storage. He indicated that parking
such vehicles on city streets poses a potential sight
distance safety problem.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to Chair/Istik that an in place
Ordinance prohibits the parking of vehicles in excess
of six feet in height within 100 feet of an
intersection. The Ordinance cannot be enforced without
proper signage.
DDPW/Liu referred the Commission to Section 10.16.490
of the City Code.
VC/Leonard stated she is concerned about sight distance
and vehicles crossing over yellow center lines to avoid
recreational vehicles. She further stated that she is
particularly concerned about safety. She indicated she
is opposed to using public streets for vehicle storage.
She appreciates both sides of the issue. However, she
recommends the City focus on the safety of its
residents. In addition, she stated her concerns about
parked vehicles causing a blight upon the City.
C/Nice stated that in his opinion, adequate provisions
exist to remedy 90 percent or more of the current
street parking of recreational and commercial vehicles.
He further stated that he sees no reason for another
layer of bureaucracy. Enforcement is the issue.
C/Nice made a motion, seconded by C/Tamaya, to table
the issue of overnight parking of recreational/
commercial vehicles on City of Diamond Bar public
streets and inform the City Council that enforcement is
the issue and that no new ordinances are necessary.
Chair/Istik stated he is in favor of enforcing the
existing codes and monitoring the enforcement for six
months to one year to see if the enforcement is
September 12, 1996 Page 9 TAT Commission
effective.
C/Nice restate his belief that no matter how many laws
are on the books, enforcement is the primary concern.
Chair/Istik stated he believes that enforcement will
mitigate a good portion of the citizen's concerns.
C/Nice stated he does not believe that recreational
vehicle parking on the City's streets compares to
enforcement concerns related to vehicles failing to
stop at stop signs. In his opinion, there are a few
Diamond Bar citizens who abuse the recreational
/commercial vehicle parking laws and these offenders
can be dealt with individually. He would prefer to see
law enforcement concentrate on the moving traffic
violations.
Sgt. Rawlings explained to Chair/Istik that most of the
enforcement items discussed at this meeting are being
addressed by the Sheriff's Department. With respect to
the 72 hour parking rule, he indicated he does not
believe Diamond Bar expects the Sheriff's Department to
mark and red tag every vehicle on the street. However,
the Sheriff's Department responds when called. He
stated that in his opinion, if the 72 hour law is
enforced, there will be no difference in the amount of
vehicles on the street. Citizens will be angry because
vehicles they use on a regular basis have been marked
and red tagged.
C/Tamaya suggested that if the law is not currently
being enforced, it would be difficult for the City to
enforce any new laws. He would like to see the current
laws enforced. He stated that in his opinion, citizens
should exercise their responsibility to call the
Sheriff's Department when they observe a violation.
C/Nice recommended the City initiate educational
programs to advise citizens regarding the law and
options for resolving conflicts.
VC/Leonard concurred with C/Nice regarding education of
the public regarding the existing laws. She reiterated
' her safety concerns.
C/Virginkar stated he does not believe safety is an
September 12, 1996
Page 10
T&T Commission
issue with respect to overnight parking of recreational
vehicles. If recreational or commercial vehicles are
improperly parked, it is an ongoing issue. He further
stated that in his opinion, the only issue is
enforcement. He indicated that about 50 percent of the
concerns brought to the Traffic and Transportation
Commission deal with enforcement and favors
recommending increased enforcement of existing laws to
the City Council.
VC/Leonard pointed out that the City has received
letters from three citizens favoring enforcement of a
ban on overnight parking.
C/Nice called for the question. He reiterated his
motion to table the matter of overnight parking of
recreational/commercial vehicles on City of Diamond Bar
public streets and to recommend to the City Council
that they instruct law enforcement to strictly enforce
the existing laws. The motion was approved with the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Nice, Tamaya, Virginkar
VC/Leonard, Chair/Istik
None
None
Chair/Intik stated his no vote is because he believes
the matter should not be passed on to the City Council.
Greg Cullen asked for clarification of the vote.
VC/Leonard stated her no vote is because she is
concerned about the 72 hour law and that some citizens
use public streets for recreational and commercial
vehicle storage. She indicated she favors enforcement
of the existing laws.
Don Fisher recommended the City employ a Community
Service Officer to enforce the Parking Ordinance.
Sgt. Rawlings responded to Mr. Fisher that criminal
enforcement has priority over 72 hour parking. The
Sheriff's Department responds to calls on a priority
basis.
Al Rumpilla asked that the motion be reiterated.
September 12, 1996 Page 11 T&T Commission
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Request to red curb the entrance/exit driveway of
the Diamond Bar Post Office at Montefino Avenue.
C/Tamaya made a motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to
forward a recommendation to the City Council to
red curb the north side of Montefino Avenue
between the post office's general public driveway
and Diamond Bar Boulevard, 15 feet easterly from
curb return of the "Post Office Trucks Only"
driveway, and 15 feet westerly from the curb
return of the post office's general public
driveway. Without objections, the motion was so
ordered.
VI. NEW BUSINESS - Continued to October 10, 1996.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS - None
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF:
A. Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update: Sgt. Rawlings
presented the Monthly Traffic Enforcement Update
for August, 1996. The August Enforcement Index
was 36.9.
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
XI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Traffic and Transportation Commission, C/Nice made a
motion, seconded by VC/Leonard to adjourn the meeting.
Chair/Intik adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. to
October 10, 1996.
Attest: �}
,. y+
Jaok Intik y
-C�air
s
eSpeC
lly,
David G. L1u
Secretary