Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/14/1995CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Istik called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Hearing Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance By Commissioner Ortiz. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Chair Istik, Ortiz, Gravdahl, Virginkar Absent: Vice -Chair Leonard Staff: Deputy Director of Public Works, David Liu; Administrative Assistant, Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings; and Recording Secretary, Carol Dennis I. SWEARING-IN: A. Swearing-in of Traffic and Transportation Commissioner Arun Virginkar. City Clerk Lynda Burgess administered the oath of office to Commissioner Arun Virginkar. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Meeting of July 13, 1995. Meeting of August 10, 1995. A motion was made by C/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Ortiz to table the approval of minutes of July 13, 1995 and August 10, 1995 to the October 12, 1995 meeting. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. III. COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Ortiz requested an updated City Council and City Commissions' roster. C/Ortiz stated he received a letter from Ted Poellnitz, 411 Rancheria Road. Mr. Poellnitz is concerned that the intersection of Rancheria Road and Golden Springs Drive is not listed for traffic signal warrant study and has not been reconstructed to accommodate handicap access ramps. September 14, 1995 Page 2 T&T Commission C/Ortiz stated he is aware of a number of accidents at the intersection of Cold Spring Lane and Diamond Bar Boulevard. He suggested a study of the intersection and restriction of U-turns. He noted an accident at the intersection of Mountain Laurel Way and Diamond Bar Boulevard and suggested a restriction of U-turns may be in order. Chair/Istik welcomed Commissioner Virginkar to the Traffic and Transportation Commission. C/Virginkar stated he is honored to serve on the Traffic and Transportation Commission and assist the residents of Diamond Bar. He indicated he lives on Coyote Springs Drive behind Quail Summit Elementary School and he is a business owner. He further stated he views his responsibilities on the Commission as the City's safety concerns, comfort, ease of traffic and pedestrian movement, and the enhancement of the City's image. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Oscar Law, 21511 Pathfinder Road, stated he lives diagonally from Diamond Bar High School on a small cul-de-sac where there is barely space for three vehicles to travel in the same or opposite direction. When the high school was built, the residents petitioned Mr. Schabarum to have one side of the street tagged as "One Hour Parking" for the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on school days. He indicated he has had difficulty getting the Sheriff's Department to respond in a timely fashion to his request to tag a vehicle that was blocking his driveway. Mr. Law stated he would like to have the Traffic and Transportation Commission work with the Parks and Recreation Commission so that when the City puts in a sidewalk there will be no need to rework the area by requesting additional contingency money. He further stated that, in his opinion, the City has a need for sidewalks on Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. He indicated he would like the Commission to propose a resolution to the City Council that any project bid by the City must be passed by all Commissions including the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to City Council approval. In his opinion, the City should conduct itself in a fashion similar to that of private business in order to avoid contingencies. September 14, 1995 Page 3 TAT commission C/Ortiz stated he agrees with Mr. Law. In addition, he would like to have sidewalk lighting included in the agenda. Chair/Istik stated that, according to State law, the City is required to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. C/Gravdahl stated that, instead of adding a 15 percent overrun to a job, it would be preferable to let the bid and determine whether there may be concerns which might increase the bid. Chair/Istik stated that a precise amount of money could be let only for the bid amount. Regarding any monies needed for additional work, the contract could be halted until additional funds are appropriated by the City Council. C/Virginkar asked if the City's budget is public. Chair/Istik responded that the budget is reviewed, discussed, and voted in at a public meeting. DDPW/Liu responded to C/Virginkar that Mr. Law has been expressing his concerns to the City Council. With respect to Public Works contracts the City follows the Public Contract Code. Additionally, the "green book" allows a 25 percent overage of the contract price. Typically, the City recommends a contingency of 10 to 15 percent for each project brought before the City Council. The percentage of contingency depends on types of contracts (i.e. lump sum vs. unit price), nature and complexity of the project. DDPW/Liu stated that residents in attendance for this meeting have requested that Item VI. B., Overnight Parking, be moved forward on the agenda. In addition, there are residents who wish to be heard with respect to agenda Item V. B.. He recommended the Commission begin with Item V. B., followed by Item VI. B., and proceed with the balance of the agenda in order. Without objection, the Commission concurred. V. CONSENT CALENDAR: B. Request to install "Do Not Block Intersection" pavement marking on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Gona ' court. AA/Aberra stated that staff, based on the site September 14, 1995 Page 4 T&T Commission investigation/observations conducted on August 31, 1995 and September 5, 1995, recommends the request be denied at this time. Furthermore, Golden Springs Drive will be resurfaced during fiscal year 1996-1997. This request will be considered during the resurfacing phase. Chair/Istick declared the public hearing open. Sandy Miller, 1111 S. Loxley Place, stated she is a member of the board of directors of Cross Keys Association and a Registered Engineer for the States of California and Nevada. She indicated she is a Consulting Engineer for a traffic and transportation engineering firm located in Diamond Bar. She stated she was asked to represent the association as their spokesperson. She further stated the association requests the "Do Not Block Intersection" pavement markings at the intersection. During peak period a.m. and p.m. conditions, traffic blocks the intersection making it extremely difficult to enter and leave the complex. This traffic condition also occurs during overloads of the SR 60 Freeway. She indicated it is not unusual for the residents to experience several minutes of delay. The residents also believe that the pavement markings, together with the street signs that are currently in place, will improve safety and reduce accidents and fuel consumption. Nicki Dolce, Gona Court, stated there is considerable congestion in the area. In spite of the current street signs, motorists move through the right -turn lane without yielding. She noted several accidents at the location including an accident in which her husband was involved. Richard Smiley, 1002 Gona Court, stated he endorses the previous speakers. He further stated he owns Diamond Bar Management Services, management agency for Cross Keys Association and is a resident of the project. He indicated the association could wait for the resurfacing. However, the problems exist now and the only missing ingredient is the pavement markings. It is a very congested area and motorists do not voluntarily yield to the traffic entering and leaving the complex. Therefore, with the consideration of minimal expense for painting, the residents would like 1 September 14, 1995 Page 5 T&T Commission to see this measure of solution initiated immediately. While it will not solve the problems, it is an interim solution toward reducing the problems until the street resurfacing is completed. He requested the Commission give prime consideration to this interim solution. Oscar Law stated he was told by DDPW/Liu that the pavement markings would cost the City approximately $500. He further commented that this money will not come out of the City's General Fund. It can come from Proposition A or B monies. Mr. Law encouraged the Commission to recommend to the City Council that this action be taken immediately. Martha Bruske, 600 South Great Bend Drive, recommended that immediate action be taken on the residents' request. In her opinion, the request is very valid. Steve Nice, Rising Star Drive, stated he is shocked that the City Hall of Diamond Bar would have an opportunity to assist a group of homeowners at such a small expense and decide to wait a year. He requested the Commission help the residents by recommending immediate action. Chair/Istik declared the public meeting closed. C/Gravdahl stated he agrees with the speakers that the pavement should be painted as soon as possible. C/Ortiz stated he agrees that action should be taken immediately. C/Virginkar stated his first impression was to wait until next year. After listening to the residents, he concurs that action should be taken immediately. Chair/Istik stated his experience has been to save the "Do Not Block Intersection" areas for critical service areas such as fire stations. The law prohibits the blocking of intersections. Sgt. Rawlings responded to Chair/Istik that he would need to check the code to determine if enforcement is ' possible with the current street signage in place. September 14, 1995 Page 6 T&T Commission DDPW/Liu responded to Chair Istik that the pavement painting would complement the current signage and give approaching motorists additional visibility. In response to C/Virginkar, Chair/Istik stated that it is likely the intersection would not qualify for a traffic warrant study because of its proximity to the freeway on and off -ramp. The volume of traffic would be very low because it is a cul-de-sac. A motion was made by C/Ortiz and seconded by C/Gravdahl to recommend immediate action to install a "Do Not Block Intersection" pavement marking on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Gona Court. The motion was approved 4-0 with the following roll call: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz, Gravdahl, Virginkar, Chair/Istik NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Leonard VI. OLD BUSINESS: B. Overnight Parking. Chair/Istik declared the public meeting open. Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Drive, recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission table this agenda item. If this Commission feels it needs to make a recommendation to the City Council, the recommendation should be that there is no good reason to change the ordinance at this time or in the future. He stated he cannot understand why Mr. Todd Chavers requested that this item be added to the agenda when he is no longer a member of this community. Mr. Chavers knows that this is and always has been an issue that divides this City. Mr. Rumpilla indicated he had spoken to this Commission in October, 1991 regarding this issue. There were approximately 200 people in attendance who supported his position. In addition, he stated he had turned in a petition with 300 signatures which opposed "no overnight parking". He presented a copy of the petition containing 148 signatures. He stated the other 152 -' signatures are on a document which the City has in its possession. When he requested a copy of the original document, he received only the portion with the 148 1 September 14, 1995 Page 7 T&T Commission signatures. He also presented a tape copy of the 1991 meeting during which the attendees spoke in opposition to "no overnight parking". Mr. Rumpilla submitted three letters in opposition to the "no overnight parking" ordinance: One from City Council candidate, Carol Herrera; the second letter from City Council candidate, Jim Paul, and the third letter from Evelyn Kuida. In addition, he stated Red Calkins requested that his name be entered into the record as opposing "no overnight parking". Mr. Rumpilla referred the Commission to the parking prohibitions currently in effect. He recited vehicle codes which are enforceable and, in his opinion, address all of the adverse situations voiced by those in favor of a "no overnight parking" ordinance. Mr. Rumpilla stated he believes there are a minimum of 6,000 vehicles parked on the streets of Diamond Bar each night. He questioned where these vehicles would be parked if the City adopted a "no overnight parking" ordinance. Mr. Rumpilla stated that many cities have adopted a permit system. In order to qualify for a permit, a property owner is subject to inspection of their garage area which must accommodate two vehicles. In addition, the driveway area must accommodate two additional vehicles. Upon compliance, one permit for a fifth vehicle will be issued. Mr. Rumpilla stated that if the "no overnight parking" ordinance is enacted, the City could suffer loss of revenue from recreation vehicle owners. He further stated that he was told by a District Attorney that recreational vehicles fall under the "grandfather" or "sunset" clause and owners would not be forced to remove their vehicles. Mr. Rumpilla presented additional letters as evidence of opposition to "no overnight parking" from Hugh Wheeler, and Dixie and Fred Martinez. Mr. Rumpilla concluded by advising the Commission that this matter should not be brought before the City Council during an election period. He recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend no action should be taken. Chair/Istik noted 10 audience members opposed to "no overnight parking". He stated he does not consider agenda items threatening. He views the items as an opportunity for September 14, 1995 Page 8 T&T Commission discussion in a public forum. Martha Bruske stated she favors a ban on,overnight parking. She indicated she felt that the City had'not given sufficient notice of this agenda item. Poor communication is one of the biggest problems in Diamond Bar. In her opinion, this issue is important and perhaps should go to a vote of the people. Prior to making a recommendation, the Commission should provide comparative statistics and data from other cities for consideration. She stated she believes the City's staff has a tendency to obtain data from E1 Monte. She further stated Diamond Bar is not E1 Monte and does not aspire to be El Monte. The data should come from Claremont, LaVerne and Bradbury. People used to think Diamond Bar was an upscale community. A little driving around will tell you that Diamond Bar should take a look at what is occurring.in the City. The data that staff collects should include procedures for making exceptions such as accommodating occasional overnight guests. Crime statistics should be collected as a part of this study because she feels that if there are not a lot of cars on the streets at night, crime is reduced. It appears the Commission does not have enough information to proceed. In addition, there has not been sufficient community input. Ms. Bruske stated the residents who cannot park their vehicles in their garages because they are filled with miscellaneous items are not victims, they are perpetrators. The City suffers because buildings have been built without mandating adequate parking. She indicated that people have a tendency to leave their driveway areas clear and park their vehicles on the street, sometimes in front of their neighbor's house. In her opinion, the garage and the driveway belong to the property owner. It is the property owner's responsibility to maintain these areas as described by City standards. The street is owned and maintained by all taxpayers. A restriction on parking is not an infringement of rights. Emergency vehicles can travel more safely and rapidly, and emergency personnel can spot curb numbers more easily and function more effectively with an uncluttered working area. She stated that in her 20 years of residency which includes six years of Cityhood, she has watched her neighborhood systematically deteriorated. In fact, she has watched entire sections of the City deteriorated. She challenged everyone present to visit the area bounded by Prospectors Road, Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar Boulevard and the SR 60 Freeway around 7:30 p.m. ISeptember 14, 1995 Page 9 TAT commission to 8:00 a.m. She stated the area is a big -rig parking lot. She referred to the dead-end area of Gentle Springs Lane west of Diamond Bar Boulevard as a potentially hazardous area. Oscar Law stated he is opposed to the ban on no -overnight parking. The current ordinances respond adequately to improper parking of vehicles and he sees no reason to change the law. He urged the Commission to table the matter. Steve Nice referred the Commission to a letter from City Council candidate Don Schad in opposition to the ban on no overnight parking. Mr. Nice stated that when Diamond Bar was built, the developers built homes which envisioned street parking. He reiterated that in today's economy, children return home to live with their parents. Most properties have two car garages and, therefore, there are more cars than available space. Charging for parking permits is another method of taxing the citizens of Diamond Bar. He suggested that the Commission table the issue and not bring the matter back to the public. DDPW/Liu responded to C/Ortiz that this matter was requested by C/Chavers with the Commission's concurrence. C/Chavers felt that the City has lost some of its appeal because of Ms. Bruske asked the Commissioners to take advantage of the opportunity presented to them to restore City pride. She encouraged them to take the first step and ban overnight parking on the City's streets. Frank Dursa stated that, in his view, a ban on overnight parking is the taking of the citizen's rights. He reminded the Commission about the negative responses by the citizens in October, 1991 to the proposed ban. Sgt. Rawlings responded to Frank Dursa that the Sheriff's Department does not enforce the "no -overnight parking" in the County areas. Nancy Villalobos, a Diamond Bar citizen, stated she is a 15 - year resident. She further stated she prefers the City make no changes to the parking ordinance. She perceives the proposed ban on overnight parking to be a form of control. In her opinion, it would add an additional financial burden and inconvenience to all recreational and sports vehicle owners. She recommended the Commission table the matter. Oscar Law stated he is opposed to the ban on no -overnight parking. The current ordinances respond adequately to improper parking of vehicles and he sees no reason to change the law. He urged the Commission to table the matter. Steve Nice referred the Commission to a letter from City Council candidate Don Schad in opposition to the ban on no overnight parking. Mr. Nice stated that when Diamond Bar was built, the developers built homes which envisioned street parking. He reiterated that in today's economy, children return home to live with their parents. Most properties have two car garages and, therefore, there are more cars than available space. Charging for parking permits is another method of taxing the citizens of Diamond Bar. He suggested that the Commission table the issue and not bring the matter back to the public. DDPW/Liu responded to C/Ortiz that this matter was requested by C/Chavers with the Commission's concurrence. C/Chavers felt that the City has lost some of its appeal because of September 14, 1995 Page 10 T&T Commission the abuse of the street parking. It was important to provide a public firum such as the Traffic and Transportation Commission for public consideration. C/Ortiz stated that the current laws should be enforced to control the situation. A motion was made by C/Ortiz and seconded by C/Gravdahl to table Item VI B. Overnight Parking. Chair/Istik stated that he has mixed feelings on this item. The City streets were originally planned to carry traffic and to accommodate some parking. C/Chavers had commented that some people abuse the privilege. Chair/Istik indicated he does not view this as an attempt for the City to generate revenue. In his opinion, this would be an attempt to maintain greater sight distance. He cited an instance in which his neighbor, upon backing his motorcycle out of his driveway into the street, was hit and killed by an oncoming vehicle. The point could be made that if cars were not parked on the street, he might have seen and been seen by the approaching motorist. This may or may not be the case. However, with more cars on the street, less sight distance is available. In his opinion, most drivers do not drive slower on residential streets when there are cars parked on the street and the site distance is reduced. He stated that, as an engineer, he has safety concerns. He agrees that other city's policies should be investigated. He stated that the matter is best tabled until after November so that the issue is not politicized. He indicated he would support the motion that is on the table. C/Gravdahl stated he has called the Sherrif's Department regarding trailers illegally parked on his street. Although the trailers were ticketed, they were not moved and no further action was taken. He indicated that a clean-up of illegally parked trailers and vehicles would make a significant difference in the street parking. Chair/Istik stated that some areas of the City do not benefit from street sweeping because of the vehicles parked on the streets. The motion was passed 3-1 with the following roll call: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz, Gravdahl, Chair/Istik NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None 1 September 14, 1995 Page 11 ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Virginkar ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Leonard V. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued): T&T Commission A. Request to install a crosswalk on Copley Drive adjacent to entrance to Diamond Bar City Hall. (Continued from August 10, 1995.) DDPW/Liu stated staff recommends, based upon safety concerns and numerous studies conducted regarding the request, that the Traffic and Transportation Commission deny the request to install a crosswalk on Copley Drive adjacent to the driveway entrance to City Hall. This request was brought to City Hall by a senior citizen who has difficulty crossing Copley Drive from the bus service drop point to City Hall and is very concerned for her safety. She makes this bus, trip each month to obtain her subsidized bus passes. DDPW/Liu indicated that staff spoke with the citizen regarding the use of the Dial -A -Cab service as an alternative. C/Gravdahl suggested that the management of the complex on Highland Valley Road could be authorized by the City to offer transit tickets for sale at their location since many residents of the senior citizens complex use transit services. This would avoid the necessity of having senior citizens making a monthly trek to City Hall to complete their purchases. DDPW/Liu responded to C/Gravdahl that staff will consider his recommendation as an option. A second option is to have staff visit the complex during the monthly sale period. C/Gravdahl stated his proposed recommendation may result in increased sales of transit tickets. C/Virginkar stated that, rather than denying the request, he would like to have staff monitor the street to determine the number of pedestrian crossings and report back in six months. In his opinion, the issue is whether pedestrians can safely cross Copley Drive. C/Gravdahl suggested a crosswalk gives a false sense of security and increases the potential for accidents. September 14, 1995 Page 12 T&T Commission C/Virginkar stated he agrees with C/Gravdahl and suggested a warrant study for a traffic signal at the City Hall location. Chair/Istik stated it is ironic that people must make a trip to City Hall to obtain transportation passes which necessitates a hazardous crossing. He suggested the passes could be sent through the mail. C/Gravdahl stated there should be several locations around the City for ticket sales. Chair/Istik suggested that the City encourage Foothill Transit to stop in front of the City Hall building. SE/Liu stated staff resources are limited. At this time, various options are being considered and staff will respond to the direction of the City Manager/City Council. A motion was made by C/Gravdahl and seconded by C/Ortiz to table the request to install a crosswalk on Copley Drive adjacent to the entrance to Diamond Bar City Hall. The Commission will consider the various ticket selling options to be presented by staff at the October 12, 1995 Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. VI. OLD BUSINESS (Continued): A. Traffic Warrant Analysis for Diamond Bar Boulevard at Quail Summit Drive and at Montefino Avenue. DDPW/Liu stated the intersections of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Quail Summit Drive and at Montefino Avenue were studied for potential traffic signal installations as well as, flashing beacons and pedestrian crosswalks. DKS Associates has provided a copy of their study for the Commission's consideration. Mario Sanchez, DKS Associates, stated that four applicable traffic signal warrants were applied to the two intersections. DKS Associates conducted 24 hour counts on all of the approaches of the two intersections. Pedestrian counts were taken for a period of twelve hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on a Wednesday in August, 1995. In addition, accident September 14, 1995 Page 13 T&T Commission history for the two intersections was considered. Mr. Sanchez stated the Montefino Avenue intersection meets the traffic signal warrant based on the number of accidents at the location. One leg of the Quail Summit Drive intersection fronts a parking lot. Therefore, adequate storage is not available for queuing of vehicles in the parking lot. DDPW/Liu responded to C/Gravdahl that the top three locations for traffic signals installation are Diamond Bar Boulevard at Goldrush Drive, Golden Springs Drive at Calbourne Drive, and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Palomino Drive. These three locations are scheduled for the current fiscal year. If this item is reviewed and approved by the Traffic and Transportation Commission tonight, it will be forwarded to the City Council under consideration for the 1996-1997 fiscal year capital improvement project. DDPW/Liu responded to Chair/Istik that staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation Commission forward DKS Associates' recommendation of installing a traffic signal on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue to City Council to be considered for the 1996-1997 fiscal year capital improvement program. A motion was made by C/Gravdahl and seconded by C/Virginkar to refer the Traffic Warrant Analysis for Diamond Bar Boulevard at Montefino Avenue to the City Council for approval. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. VII. NEW BUSINESS - None VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: C/Gravdahl asked when the streets in the Diamond Point area will be slurry sealed. DDPW/Liu responded the bid opening date for this project is scheduled for the week of September 25. The bids will be recommended to the City Council for contract consideration. The slurry seal should begin by the end of October or the first week of November. September 14, 1995 Page 14 T&T Commission Responding to C/Gravdahl, Sgt. Rawlings stated the 25 MPH signs were recently installed on Sunset Crossing Road and that during the month of September, warning citations will be issued. Enforcement will begin the first of October. Law enforcement officers will have to conduct pacing which is very dangerous on a residential street. There are a number of streets in Diamond Bar that are in the same category as Sunset Crossing Road. Previously, the Sheriff's Department had a survey on Sunset Crossing Road that allowed enforcement and that enforcement tool has been taken away. In response to Chair/Istik, Sgt. Rawlings stated his recommended solution is as it was before - that the City should not take away law enforcement's ability to use radar on such streets. Chair/Istik stated that the Commission's action was to reduce the speed limit to the prima facia 25 MPH on those streets that would not qualify as a speed trap and radar could still be utilized. He indicated he did not recall applying it to streets that would prohibit the use of radar. C/Gravdahl stated he concurs with Chair/Istik. He indicated that Palomino Drive was the street considered for the 25 MPH prima facia where stop signs could be placed at intersections so that the streets could still be enforced with radar. He further stated he does not recall consideration of Sunset Crossing Road for 25 MPH prima facia. C/Gravdahl recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission reconsider Sunset Crossing Road as an agenda item for the October 12, 1995 meeting. Sgt. Rawlings stated that he recalls that all streets in the City that were posted 30 MPH or more would be returned to 25 MPH prima facia. Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Drive, stated there were two streets that were excluded from the change. He indicated he does not recall the street in question and he will have to check his notes. C/Gravdahl stated Prospectors Road was one street that was not being changed to 25 MPH prima facia. 1 1 1 September 14, 1995 Page 15 T&T Commission Mr. Clute stated he has not seen the speed trailer in the area. He further stated he measured the speed limit sign height on Fountain Springs Road and Cold Spring Lane. They are over 10 feet at the center of the sign and they are smaller than the signs previously posted. He is concerned that the signs may not be visible to the motorists. C/Ortiz stated that his neighbors have told him they have noticed the new signs. He has noticed the new signs and he does not feel there is a problem with the height or size of the signs. DDPW/Liu responded that the State of California requires a minimum height of 7 feet for all traffic control signs. He indicated he will discuss this issue with Mr. Clute. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Istik declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Atter Jac'Istik Ch rman Respectfully, Da?Via-G. Liu Secretary