HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/12/19941
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MAY 12, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ortiz called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. at the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Hearing Room, 21865 East
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairman Istik.
ROLL CALL
Chair/Ortiz indicated that C/Gravdahl and C/Esposito would be
absent and excused from tonight's meeting.
Commissioners: Chavers, Vice Chairman Istik, and Chairman Ortiz.
Staff: Senior Engineer, David Liu; Administrative
Assistant, Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings,
and Engineering Secretary, Linda Smith.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting of April 14, 1994
C/Chavers was excused from the April 14, 1994 Traffic and
Transportation Commission Meeting and abstained from voting on
the minutes.
Chair/Ortiz requested that he would like to review the tapes
for specific items he thought were missing from the minutes.
These items referred to discussion regarding how the minutes
are prepared and the time of the Traffic and Transportation
Commission Meetings.
SE/Liu commented that after the Traffic and Transportation
Commission tape is reviewed together with Chair/Ortiz, the
minutes would he revised to include such items accordingly.
The revised minutes would then be presented to the Commission
for approval at the June 9, 1994 meeting.
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR - None
May 12, 1994 Page 2
Vo OLD BUSINESS
A. Landscape Median Island on Golden Springs Drive Between Gona
Court and Westerly City Limit®
SE/Liu reported that the proposed medians along Golden Springs
Drive, between Gona Court and westerly City limit have been
proposed as part of the Landscaping Assessment District #38
improvements.
At the April 14, 1994 Traffic and Transportation Commission
meeting, the Commission requested this conceptual layout plan
be continued to the May 12, 1994 meeting in order to give all
Commissioners an opportunity to review this matter. With the
input received from the Commission, staff has subsequently
worked with Commissioner Chavers and received the following
comments/input: (1) To determine the need for a left -turn
pocket on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Coco's/Jack-In-
The-Box Restaurants; (2) To determine CalTrans' jurisdiction
in the vicinity of Golden Springs Drive and the SR 60 On/Off
ramps; and ( 3 ) To determine the need for the right -turn pocket
on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Calbourne Drive.
Staff presented the preliminary layout and asked the Traffic
and Transportation Commission to review and provide further
input regarding the attached plan for incorporation into the
design process.
VC/Istik suggested that the landscaping proposed for the
medians be of the drought tolerant type. He preferred the
bubbler type irrigation as opposed to spray irrigation. He
commented that less water on the asphalt extends pavement
life.
C/Chavers commented that he would like to see the striping
plan brought back to the Commission after the design phase is
completed, and asked if there had been any resolution to the
items as mentioned in the report.
With regard to item #1, SE/Liu responded that there is a need
for a left -turn pocket provided. With regard to item #2, He
stated that the exact location of CalTrans' jurisdiction is
still unknown, but that there is still time during the design
process to obtain this information. At this time, the intent
is to construct between Lemon Avenue and the westerly City
limit along the northerly frontage of Golden Springs Drive.
If there is development at a later date, the developer will
contribute to the needed improvements. Regarding item #3,
SE/Liu said the right -turn pocket on eastbound Golden Springs
Drive at Calbourne Drive, currently exists. He noted that
once the design is completed with plans and specifications, it
will be brought to the Commission for final review before
forwarding the matter to the City Council.
May 12® 1994 Page 3'
Chair/Ortiz read a memorandum from C/Gravdahl with his
comments on this item. His main concern was on the item of
the center median between Gona Court and the freeway off -
ramp. He noted that he had been in contact with SE/Liu and
his concerns were addressed, namely that the area would be
striped for future flexibility. With this in mind, he would
vote yes on the project. His other comment regarding GPAC is
noted in VIII, Items From Commissioners.
It was the consensus of the Commission to have staff proceed
with the design of the landscape median island on Golden
Springs Drive between Gona Court and westerly City limit.
B. Traffic Circulation at Lorbeer Junior High School.
AA/Aberra reported that this item is being presented as
requested by C/Esposito. The attached November 14, 1991
report discussed the traffic circulation in the vicinity of
Lorbeer Junior High School which was observed and studied in
November, 1991. The result of the observation showed illegal
U-turns and 'parking in the bicycle lane on southbound Diamond
Bar Boulevard. These activities were related to congestion
and were seen as potential safety hazard. To minimize the
impact of the U-turns and illegal parking, "No U -Turn" signs
and red curbing were installed on southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard in front of Lorbeer Junior High School.
Recently, staff visited the site and found the "No U -Turn"
signs and red curbs are still intact and visible to motorists.
There are no "No Stopping" signs installed at the site. To
better manage the congestion created by illegal double-parking
and parking in the red zone, staff recommends traffic
enforcement in the area.
C/Istik commented that enforcement is the only answer since
the school district is not staggering the class schedules and
bus service is no longer free, which seems to create more
traffic.
Sgt. Rawlings also made a site visit on Monday and noted
several illegal U-turns and the illegal parking. Although
there were illegal turns, he observed no difficulties or
hazards with these turns and questioned the length of the
existing red curbing in front of the school.
C/Ortiz asked for clarification regarding the length of red
curb.
SE/Liu responded that the total length of red curbs is
approximately 500 feet. He noted that the original intent of
the red curb markings was to prevent parking in the bike lane.
This would encourage the utilization of the on-site parking
lot to be used for loading and unloading school children.
May 12, 1994
Page 4
I
Currently, parents may be prohibited to use the on-site
parking lot.
C/Chavers commented that his recollection of the discussion
that led to the striping was such that the driveways to the
on-site parking lot are on the inside of a gradual horizontal
curve. Part of the reason for the extension of the red
curbing as painted was to allow those exiting the driveway to
actually see oncoming traffic, this eliminating the need for
those ,vehicles to pull out into the traffic lane to see on-
coming traffic. The remainder of curve was nominal so the
entire curb area was marked red, since it is the familiar
color to most people. He concurs and supports staff's
recommendation to leave the area as is.
Chair/Ortiz stated that educating the schools and parents is
another option to eliminate the on-going traffic problems and
matters of safety.
Moved by C/Chavers and seconded by VC/Istik to accept staff's
recommendation and encourage traffic enforcement as deemed
necessary by the Sheriff's Department. Further, the
Commission requested staff to explore the possibility of
distributing flyers which convey the intention and purposes of
the traffic markings in front of Lorbeer Junior High School.
Chair/Ortiz 'asked Sgt. Rawlings to provide to the Commission
the number of citations given at the school site for the next
two months.
Sgt. Rawlings responded that his computer tracking does not
allow for parking citations, but that he would do a hand tally
on a day-to-day basis.
Chair/Ortiz requested the hand tally be done for the next two
months.
The Motion carried 3-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
Chavers,
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Esposito,
V1. NEW BUSINESS
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
Gravdahl
A. Parking on Southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, Between Acacia
Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road.
AA/Aberra reported that it has been the procedure of the City
of Diamond Bar to receive and review, on a case-by-case basis,
requests from church organizations to park on major arterial
during special church services and functions. Saint Denis
May 12, 1994 Page 5
Catholic Church, located at 2151E Diamond Bar Boulevard, has
requested an on -street parking on southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road
every Sunday. To date, churches and organizations have been
given permission to park on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard,
generally between Morning Canyon Road and Silver Hawk Drive
only during special church services or functions. They are
required to cover the existing "No Parking" signs with bags
and remove them after their events end.
Staff recommends Saint Denis' request for on -street parking be
limited to special church services and functions in order to
maintain a consistent policy with other churches and
organizations. Furthermore, to minimize impact to the bicycle
lane, it is necessary to regulate the parking activities by
various organizations along Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Monsignor James Loughnane, 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., who
represents approximately 5200 families at nine services every
weekend, commented that he is concerned about the availability
of parking spaces for the worshipers during Sunday services.
The services are staggered every hour and a half, but parking
spaces are not adequate. He asked for an additional parking
area on southbound Diamond Bar Blvd. between Acacia Hill Road
and Morning Canyon Road during their Sunday church service.
C/Zstik commented that the major roadways should be used to
move traffic, not to park vehicles, but since Sunday is not a
peak travel day on Diamond Bar Blvd., he felt he could support
the request. He suggested that it be approved with a
monitoring of the situation for a period of time.
C/Chavers commented that a precedence may be set in allowing
this request, and asked staff to research comments and/or
background information regarding parking versus the number of
seat capacity during the expansion of Saint Denis Church.
There may have been an exception noted for allowing the
construction without ample parking. This would establish a
reason other than sympathy and compassion for allowing parking
on an arterial. He commented that other requests could be
forthcoming to the Commission with no other reason than a need
for more parking.
SE/Liu responded that he would check with the Planning
Department to see what records might be available, and will
provide the information to the Commission and to the Church.
Chair/Ortiz asked if there had been any complaints from the
neighbors in the areas indicated. He commented by stating
that when parking on Diamond Bar Blvd. for special occasions
and holidays was approved, it had been determined that there
were no safety hazards since the bike lane was wide. He asked
Sgt. Rawlings if he was aware of any accidents with bicyclists
and motorists parked in the lane. He also asked about the
May 12, 1994 Page 6
Monsignor's contact with members of the City Council and
inquired about their responses regarding this issue.
Monsignor Loughnane responded by saying that he had been told
Shady Dills Drive has become a shortcut to Pathfinder Road
from Diamond Bar Blvd., and had received complaints. He also
stated that he was told by Councilmembers to write a letter
and make a formal request to the Traffic and Transportation
Commission.
Sgt. Rawlings was not aware of any accidents with motorists
and bicyclists in the vicinity.
Chair/Ortiz commented that staff's report indicates that each
request is being reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and feels
the Commission can proceed with this premise, bearing in mind
any safety hazard involved. For the record, he commented that
he is a parishioner.
SE/Liu interjected with the Chair's permission to ask
Monsignor Loughnane, as the representative of Saint Denis
Church, if Saint Denis Church would be willing to pay for the
costs associated with any proposed or recommended
modifications, in terms of the signs and the installation
costs.
Monsignor Loughnane, responded that he believed this request
will need to be approved by the church's finance committee.
Chair/Ortiz moved that the Commission deny staff's
recommendation and recommend to the City Council that the
request of Saint Denis Catholic Church for on -street parking
every Sunday on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, between
Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road be permitted.
VC/Istik seconded the motion and amended the recommendation to
have a time limit set for twenty-four (24) months at which
time the request would be reviewed to assess any issues of
safety which might come up in the interim.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
C/Chavers amended the motion to ask staff to go into the
archives and seek an engineering basis to determine if there
were some over-riding concerns for the size of the parking lot
and the approval of the church, and that it be included in the
recommendation to the City Council if found.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
The Motion was passed unanimously with the following ROLL CALL -
vote:
1
J
May 12® 1994
Page 7
AYES: Chavers, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Esposito, Gravdahl
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
Chair/Ortiz conveyed C/GravdahlIs written comment which stated
that when he and C/Chavers were GPAC delegates they were
representatives of the Traffic and Transportation Commission
and would vote the consensus of the old Traffic and
Transportation Commission as far as circulation matters were
concerned. With the placement of the new members, he feels a
new consensus should be taken. By placing this item on the
next agenda, it allows the delegates to vote the consensus of
all the Traffic and Transportation Commissioners.
C/Chavers commented that he was at the last GPAC meeting,
which was held on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, and will continue to
attend as both a citizen and/or as a representative of the
Traffic and Transportation Commission.
C/Istik commented that he, too, has attended and provided
input at the GPAC meetings in the past and that he would also
be available as both a citizen and/or as a representative of
the Traffic and Transportation Commission.
Chair/Ortiz commented that C/Chavers and VC/Istik should
remain as representatives of the Traffic & Transportation
Commission to the GPAC Committee subject to any replacements
should either one be unable to attend. He also asked SE/Liu
if there was any feedback regarding the Traffic and
Transportation Commission recommendation to the Parks and
Recreation Commission on the handicapped parking at Heritage
Park issue.
SE/Liu responded that staff had conveyed the concerns and
comments of the Traffic and Transportation Commission to Mr.
Bob Rose, the Director of Community Services. Mr. Rose
contacted the Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club. The details
of the arrangements will be forthcoming.
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF
A. Traffic Signal Policy for Private and Public Street
Intersections
SE/Liu reported that a copy of the Policy for Funding
Traffic Signals at Private and Public Street
Intersections is being presented as requested by the
Commission.
May 12, 1994 Page 8
Ba Future Agenda items
C/Chavers requested that protected -permissive left -turn
phasing be investigated and discussed for use in the City j
of Diamond Bar.
C/Istik clarified protected -permissive operation as a
left -turn phasing that could change to yield on green.
C/Chavers commented that the sign utilized is "Left -Turn
Yield on Green".
Chair/Ortiz commented that this is now used on northbound
Golden Springs Drive at Diamond Bar Blvd. He commented
about the enforcement issue involved with this type of
control.
Chair/Ortiz stated that he sees a need to change the
meeting starting time from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. to
encourage public input. Further, for consistency with
all the meetings held by the City of Diamond Bar and to
allow adequate time for Commissioners to get to the
meetings after work, it is beneficial to have the
meetings start at 7:00 p.m.
With the Commission's consensus, the above mentioned
items were requested to be put on the future agenda.
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. City commission Rosters
B. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis List
C/Chavers commented that the priorities as shown in the
report are at least two to three years old and asked if
the priority list would be revisited to assure that the
most pressing need is addressed. He also asked how the
approval is handled by City Council.
VC/Istik commented that priority #4, Sunset Crossing Road
and Southbound SR 57, the traffic is generated by the
Southbound SR 57 not the east/west traffic on Sunset
Crossing Road. The southbound SR 57 traffic is motorists
who get off at Sunset Crossing Road in order to travel
south on Diamond Bar Blvd. to go to SR 60 because it was
initially designed inappropriately. He does not believe
that City of Diamond Bar funds should be spent for a
traffic signal at Sunset Crossing Road and southbound SR
57 if it is going to help primarily the southbound SR 57
to the eastbound SR 60 traffic.
SE/Liu responded that the list being presented is in
preparation for the proposed Fiscal Year 1994-95 budget.
May 12® 1994 Page 9
The budget is for seven or eight traffic signal warrant
analysis studies at approximately $1,000 per study. The
intent is for staff to conduct the proposed warrant
studies concurrently in order for the data to be
evaluated on a comprehensive level. The findings will be
brought to the Commission in order to establish a new
priority list.
C/Chavers, agreeing with VC/Istik would like to see
Sunset Crossing Road eliminated from the warrant study
list. He commented that CalTrans has jurisdiction and
they should have the information.
VC/Istik asked about the eighth analysis mentioned by
SE/Liu.
SE/Liu commented that this would be for left -turn phasing
on Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive.
C. Interim City Attorneys Re -Opening of Public Comments
Agenda Item
D. Transit Subsidy Program
SE/Liu referred to the flyer for the Transit Subsidy
Program. Funded by Proposition A funds, the subsidy
program will go into effect June 1, 1994. The City of
Diamond Bar will be subsidizing 20% discount for students
and the general public, and 50% discount for seniors and
the physically challenged citizens of Diamond Bar. This
discount applies to Metrolink, Foothill, and Metropolitan
Transit Authority (joint) passes. Fares will depend on
the traveller's route.
X1. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/Chavers, seconded by VC/Istik and carried unanimously to
adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
Respectively,
Id G. Llu
Secretary
Attest:
Tom r 1
Chairman