HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/10/1994CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF TIME TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 10,, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Chavers called the meeting to order at 6:41 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairman Gravdahl.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners: Ury, Cheng, Esposito, Vice Chairman Gravdahl, and Chairman
Chavers.
Staff: Interim City Engineer George Wentz; Senior Engineer David Liu;
Traffic Consultant Warren Sieke; Traffic Consultant Mike Myers;
Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings; and
Contract Recording Secretary Liz Myers
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting of December 16, 1993 and January 13, 1994
C/Ury indicated that he will be abstaining from voting on the minutes of
December 16, 1993 because he was absent at that subject meeting.
Moved by Vice Chairman Gravdahl, seconded by Commissioner Esposito and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes of December 16, 1993 and January
13, 1994, as presented.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES: Ury, Cheng, Esposito, VC/Gravdahl and Chair Chavers
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Ury (for the meeting of December 16, 1993)
ABSENT: None
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
February 10, 1994 Page 2
r�
I/L PUBLIC COMMENTS
Council Member Papen reported that the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) has recognized a new transportation study group called Four
Corners, which includes Diamond Bar, Chino Hills, Yorba Linda, Brea, CalTrans
Districts 7, 8, & 11, and the Four County Transportation Agencies, thus allowing the
City to receive funding from SCAG, and to be included in the Regional Transportation
Improvement Plan, which is a major step in achieving some of the transporation needs
for the community. She then reported that that MTA voted two weeks ago to fully
fund the four year car pool lane program for Los Angeles County, awarding $313
million for construction, of which $64.4 million will be received by Diamond Bar, $61
million for the 605 freeway from the Orange County line to the San Bernardino
freeway north to south, and $12 million for the 210 freeway along Foothill Boulevard.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR - None
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation by Elementary Schools in Diamond Bar Regarding Crossing Guard
Warrants
i
SE/Liu reported that, pursuant to the request of the Traffic and Transportation
i
Commission, staff has invited all the Elementary Schools to attend this meeting
for the purpose of defining the specific needs relating to crossing guard
services. He reviewed the current locations of the existing crossing guard
services, as indicated in the staff report. It is recommended that (1) the City
maintain the nine (9) existing crossing guard locations until such time as they
become obsolete; (2) any potential future locations must be required to meet
the City's Adult Crossing Guard Warrant Analysis Criteria; and (3) the City
provide an adult crossing guard at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard
and Golden Springs Drive.
AE/Liu, in response to C/Ury, stated that any future potential locations for
crossing guards that are not deemed warranted by staff will not come before
the Traffic and Transportation Commission or the City Council, unless an appeal
process is suggested.
Chair/Chavers explained to the audience that the City inherited the current
crossing guards as assignments from Los Angeles County. He stated that,
upon incorporation, it became necessary for the City to evaluate the guards and
reaffirm their position primarily for liability purposes. As a result of the ..
evaluation, it was determined that many of the crossing guards dont meet the
standards prescribed by the State of California; however, the decision was then
made to grandfather in the existing guard locations, to look at various warrant
criteria for maintaining guards, and to look at the warrant criteria for evaluating
proposed new crossing guard locations. He explained that any decision made
February 10, 1994 Page 3
by the Traffic and Transportation Commission is only a recommendation that
is presented to the City Council for their consideration.
Chair/Chavers opened the meeting and invited those wishing to speak to come
forward.
John Urban, on behalf of Evergreen Elementary School, stated that the
statistics regarding the amount of cars and pedestrians in a one hour period in
front of the school more than meet the criteria to warrant a crossing guard. He
presented photographs depicting the blind areas, and the down grade slope of
Evergreen Street that results in higher vehicle speeds that are endangering the
children.
Officer Glen Kundey, representing the Evergreen Community Club, stated that
many people exceed the speed limit, because of the down grade slope coming
south bound on Evergreen, which is not a controlled intersection. He stated
that many people making u -turns, and parking and/or double parking in the
cross walk, along with buses stopping out on the street, all create blind spots
for motorists picking up their children. He noted that the only safety net for the
children is the crossing guard.
Chair/Chavers requested staff to investigate the type of control devises that
could be used in the area to restrict u -turns and help alleviate the traffic flow.
James Arenas, on behalf of Maple Hill Elementary School, disputed some of the
calculations reflected in the study which resulted in the changes in the criteria
for crossing guards. He pointed out that there is about 3/4 of a mile of
uninterrupted curvature from Mountain Laurel, which dead ends into Maple Hill
where the crossing guard is located. If there is not a crossing guard at his
intersection, many children's lives will be jeopardized. He suggested that the
Commission accept staff's recommendation, and encouraged the audience to
attend the City Council meeting to express their concern for the safety of the
children.
Marsha Pace, on behalf of Castle Rock Elementary School, stated that two
thirds of the students attending the school either walk or are driven to school.
She stated that the parents also double park and make u -turns with no regard
to the safety of the children. The dangerous condition is further intensified
because the intersection of Cold Springs and Castle Rock Road does not have
a four way stop sign, and the intersection of Brea Canyon and Cold Springs
experiences a lot of fast moving traffic. She submitted a petition signed by
over 300 students, and submitted letters written by over 300 parents, asking
to keep the crossing guard. She stated that they, too, dispute the statistics
presented in the traffic study.
February 10, 1994 Page 4
i
Rosetta Pochecko, residing at 676 Linwood Drive, on behalf of Walnut
Elementary School, stated that many parents at their school also make u -turns
in the cross walk with no regard to the safety of the children. It is critical that
their school receive a crossing guard for the intersection of Lycoming and
Glenwood because eventually some one will get killed. She offered to be a
crossing guard for the school.
Carolyn Hawl, principal at Quail Summit Elementary School, stated that four
children from the school have prepared an essay as to the reason why a
crossing guard is needed for their school.
Jonathon Martinez, Jennifer Li, Chad Laclusik, and Kimberly Garcia all read their
essays stressing the importance of safety and the need for a crossing guard at
their school.
Jim Miller, residing at 21330 Chirping Sparrow Road, on behalf of all the
schools, stated that everyone has presented testimony regarding their concerns
for the safety of their children at their schools, and it would not seem advisable
to make the situation less safe than what is currently existing. He asked if the
City could somehow enforce no double parking and u -turns in the school areas.
He requested that the City consider the safety of the children ahead of
statistics, and dollars and cents.
There being no one else in the audience wishing to speak, Chair/Chavers closed
the meeting and returned the matter back to the Commission for consideration.
Moved by C/Ury and seconded by C/Cheng to accept staff's recommendation
that (1) the City maintain the nine (9) existing crossing guard locations until
such time as they become obsolete; (2) any potential future locations must be
required to meet the City's Adult Crossing Guard Warrant Analysis Criteria; and
(3) the City provide an adult crossing guard at the intersection of Diamond Bar
Boulevard and Golden Springs Drive.
Chair/Chavers pointed out that, though the City can increase enforcement in
these areas, the problems in front of the school are caused mostly by parents.
He pointed out that crossing guards cannot be placed on every corner of every
street, and it is important that parents begin to drive more safely.
The Motion carried 5-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
Ury, Cheng, Esposito, ®/C/Gravdahl and Chair Chavers
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
Mone
ABSENT:
None
February 10, 1994 Page 5
V/. ®LD BUS/NESS
A. Striping on Mountain Laurel Way at Diamond Bar Boulevard
AA/Aberra reported that staff conducted traffic counts at the intersections of
Diamond Bar Boulevard/Cold Springs Lane and Diamond Bar Boulevard/Mountain
Laurel for comparison purposes to determine if there would be any unnecessary
delay to right turning motorists when the through traffic prevents right turn on
right movements. When the data was compared, it was found that the traffic
volume at the intersection of Mountain Laurel/Diamond Bar Boulevard was 50%
greater then the traffic volume at Cold Springs Lane/Diamond Bar Boulevard.
The data also indicated that the shared use of the curb lane should not cause
unnecessary delay. It is recommended that the Commission recommend to the
City Council to stripe left and through lanes on the eastbound and westbound
approaches of Mountain laurel Way at Diamond Bar Boulevard and install 100
feet of red curb on the north side of Mountain Laurel Way between Silver Rain
Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard.
ICE/Wentz stated that the recommendation holds merit based upon the facts
and figures identified at this intersections however, he noted that the
intersection is also functioning as it presently exists, and there is not a huge
compelling reason to necessarily change the current operations. He stated that
the item was investigated based upon the request made by a citizen.
AE/Liu, in response to C/Esposito, stated that staff has only received one
response, at this time, from the two property owners affected by the red
curbing.
Debora Renegar, residing at 1386 Rolling Knoll Road, stressed the importance
of assuring that the intersection is clearly marked so that there is no confusion
that the left lane is separate from the right and straight lane.
C/Ury noted that the lane widths may have to be changed after the lane
configuration has been designed, He suggested that it may be appropriate to
put red curb on each one of these sites both north and south of Diamond Bar
Boulevard.
Traffic Consultant Warren Sieke pointed out that, when considering the width
of the lanes on the west lane, it should be noted that a school bus makes a
right turn from south bound Diamond Bar to west bound Mountain Laurel that
would have a difficult time turning if the west bound lane is too narrow.
Moved by VC/Gravdahl and seconded by C/Ury to accept staff°s
recommendation to recommend to the City Council to stripe left and through
lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches of Mountain laurel Way at
February toe 1994 Page 6
Diamond Bar Boulevard and install 100 feet of red curb on the north side of
Mountain Laurel Way between Silver Hain Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard.
The Motion carried 5-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Ury, Cheng, Esposito, VC/Gravdahl and Chair Chavers
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
VII. ITEMS FROM STAFF
A. Presentation: Intersection Modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar
Boulevard and Grand Avenue at Golden Springs Drive
ICE/Wentz, utilizing a displayed graphic, reported that staff is in the process of
proceeding with the design of Grand Avenue in terms of it's overlay and/or
partial reconstructions. He stated that one of the significant consideration is
the treatment of the intersections, particularly at Grand Avenue/Diamond Bar
i Boulevard, and Grand Avenue/Golden Springs. There has also been some
consideration given to striping Grand Avenue three lanes in each direction to
increase the capacity of that roadway, but restrict the use of the outside curb
lane in each direction perhaps to be used only by carpoolers. He then reviewed
the proposals to widen the intersection at Grand Avenue/Diamond Bar
Boulevard, traveling westerly: relocate the curb and gutter; relocate the median
further to the south to improve the traffic flow; extend the median left turn
pocket towards the east to increase capacity; continue to permit left turns into
the drive of the shopping center; relocate the median, on the west side of the
intersection, to the north; and possibly put in a right turn pocket on the west
corner in front of the bank. He then reviewed the proposals for the intersection
of Grand Avenue/Golden Springs: lengthen the turn pocket at the median, on
the east side of the intersection, to accommodate a double left turn on to south
bound Golden Springs by removing the existing Sycamore trees; the City has
secured approximately 15 feet to 25 feet of the vacant property at the south
east corner to widen the roadway and make other improvements at that
intersection; widen north bound Golden Springs to the east to accommodate
the double left turns coming from Grand Avenue; put a single left turn, at the
west side of the intersection, to go north bound Golden Springs with the
potential of three through lanes; and gain width through that intersection by
some widening on the north side, with possibly some minor widening on the
south side of that intersection, and eliminating the current curbs in the medians,
and painting in the divider.
Chair/Chavers inquired of the lane widths just to the west of Montefino.
February 10® 1994 Page 7
ICE/Wentz stated that each of the lane widths will be approximately 11 feet,
in addition to the gutter. He stated that additional speed studies will be
conducted to determine if a reduction in speed limits is justified.
Chair/Chavers suggested that staff investigate if it would be feasible to have a
"right lane must turn right, buses and HOV type vehicles excepted" as a way
to encourage higher ridership.
Sgt. Rawlings noted that such an approach may create more lane changing
which may result in more traffic collisions. He also noted that, with the man
power situation as it is, it would be difficult to enforce.
ICE/Wentz explained that the "carpool" concept was suggested by staff to
encourage a different type of use of Grand Avenue for those traveling through
the City, and to encourage reduced trips, thus meetings some of the AQMD trip
reduction requirements. He noted that appropriate openings or segments will
be provided for traffic for the purpose of entering the carpool lane.
In response to C/Esposito, ICE/Wentz stated that, basically, the existing wide
portions of the medians that are turfed would remain; however, staff is
suggesting that the shrubs in the short median sections be replaced with river
rock, which is lower maintenance for the City.
C/Ury suggested that staff look at the traffic flow turning left from Diamond Bar
Blvd. on to Grand Ave. traveling east to west because the traffic comes close
together.
Chair/Chavers suggested that the median nose be pushed back away, flattening
the arch.
B. Presentation: Design of Brea Canyon Road Between Fountain Springs Road and
Cool Springs Drive
ICE/Wentz reported that the previous General Plan designated Brea Canyon
Road as a secondary roadway, which means it accommodates a 80 foot right-
of-way section, with a 64 foot payment, or a four travel lane roadway with
appropriate left turn sections in the center. He stated that, with the General
Plan under reconsideration, it may be a good time to assess the theme desired
on Brea Canyon Road.
'Senior Engineer Consultant Mike Myers, utilizing"a displayed exhibit, described the existing roadway conditions of Brea Canyon Road between Fountain Springs
Road and Cool Springs to Diamond Bar Boulevard, He reviewed the following
concept design: the improvement contemplates one lane in each direction with
appropriate protected turn lanes at the intersections and driveways in front of
Heritage Park; perpetuating the no stopping any time on both the east and west
February 10, 1994 Page 8
side, except in front of the park; include a Class I bicycle trail, on the east side,
and a pedestrian sidewalk area, both off of the roadway; meander the road to
avoid existing trees; striping changes in the commercial area in the southern
end of Diamond Bar Blvd., to include anon pavement bikeway; the frontage of
the high school would have no changes, except perhaps a minor realignment
of striping north of Fountain Springs; and perhaps reclassify the roadway from
a secondary to a lesser classification.
The Traffic and Transportation Commission came forward to view the displayed
graphic more closely. Staff provided specific responses, in an informal manner,
to any inquiries or comments made.
ICENVentz stated that the proposal is scheduled to go to the City Council within
the next month for consideration; and, depending upon the Commissions
comments and the City Council comments, it is scheduled to go to design this
spring. He stated that the Brea Canyon Road project is an approved project,
with available funding of $200,000 for this year.
Chair/Chavers inquired if the funding used would prevent the City from
j reclaiming the right-of-way in the future if there was an overwhelming need to
create four lanes.
ICEMlentz explained that all of the funds presently proposed for this project
would be gas tax or General Fund monies, which would not preclude reclaiming
the right-of-way if needed. In response to another inquiry made by
Chair/Chavers, he stated that $10,000 is allocated for bike lanes using SB821
funds, and staff will be presenting a report regarding an additional $19,000
proposed to be allocated towards this project.
V/!I. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
C/Ury requested staff to investigate if the curb of the street intersecting Fallow Field
was painted red an additional 25 feet, as was suggested by VC/Gravdahl. He then
stated that, in his opinion, a parking structure in that area would not be feasible. He
suggested that the parking across First Mortgage should be posted the same as the
east side because the employees are merely moving their cars every four hours.
C/Ury, noting that this would be his last meeting, thanked ex -councilman John Forbing
for having giving him the opportunity to serve on the Traffic and Transportation
Commission. He thanked his fellow commissioners as well.
C/Cheng noted that the City Entrance Sign at Grand Avenue, between Long View and
Summitridge, appears rusted. _
February 10® 1994 Page 9
VC/Gravdahl explained the history of the Diamond Bar brand that led
to the design of the Entrance Signs and its rustic appearance. He
stated that the base of the signs will be covered, year round, by
bougainvillaea, or another flowering plant.
C/Cheng requested an update to the status of the traffic signal at
Shadow Canyon Drive/Diamond Bar Boulevard.
SE/Liu reported that the design of the traffic signals has been
completed, and will be brought to the City Council for approval at
the first meeting in March 1994. He stated that construction of
the signal should begin around April or May 1994.
C/Cheng expressed her appreciation for having served on the Traffic
and Transportation Commission.
VC/Gravdahl inquired if it was possible to give a limited
deputization of crossing guards, as is being done in Arizona, to
remind parents that double parking and parking in crosswalks is
illegal.
Sgt. Rawlings stated that, to his knowledge, California does not
have a provision making limited deputization possible; however, a
citizen could make a complaint, requiring an officer to come out to
make a report and be forwarded to the courts for prosecution. He
stated a photograph of the violator is not acceptable because it
does not adequately identify the driver of the vehicle.
C/Esposito noted that double parking and triple parking occurs
before and after school at Lorbeer Elementary School.
Chair/Chavers requested staff to provide the Commission with an
updated list of traffic signals. He stated that the Commission
should receive an update tho their status every six months.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/Ury, seconded by C/Cheng and carried unanimously to
adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
Respectively,
v
Davia G. Liu
Secretary
Attest:
. Todd Chavers
Chairman