HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/8/1991CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AUGUST 8, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ortiz called the meeting to order at 6:30
p.m. at the Diamond Bar Library, 1061 South Grand
Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Chairman Ortiz.
ROLL CALL: Commissioner Beke, Commissioner Fritz, Commissioner
Chavers, Vice Chairman Gravdahl, and Chairman
Ortiz.
Also present were City Engineer Sid Mousavi,
Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra, Parks and
Maintenance Director Charles Janiel, Sergeant
Rawlings, and Contract Secretary Liz Myers.
APPROVAL OF C/Beke requested the Minutes of July 11, 1991 be
MINUTES: amended on page 2, first paragraph to read
"reconsider".
Sgt. Rawlings requested that the minutes be amended
Request for AA/Aberra addressed the Commission regarding the
Road Closure: request to limit access to the Gateway Center,
Ranch Festival Copley, Valley Vista, and Bridge Gate during the
Ranch Festival. It is recommended that the area
have a limited access between 3:00 p.m. September
27 and 10:00 p.m. September 29, 1991. It is
further recommended that the Commission waive all
fees required for road closure.
VC/Gravdahl inquired where parking will be
permitted.
to properly spell the name "Randy Clute".
Motion was made by VC/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Beke
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Minutes of
July 11, 1991, as amended.
COMMISSION
C/Beke requested an update of the sidewalk project
COMMENTS:
on Brea Canyon under the 60 freeway.
CE/Mousavi indicated that the contract for the
project has been awarded. The City awaits CalTrans
encroachment permit.
Chair/Ortiz suggested that the Commission meet
again later in the month to be able to discuss all
the items on the agenda. The Commission will
determine the date later in the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Pat Byham, resident of Diamond Bar, expressed her
concern for the traffic problem on Grand Avenue.
She requested a solution to the problem.
NEW BUSINESS:
Request for AA/Aberra addressed the Commission regarding the
Road Closure: request to limit access to the Gateway Center,
Ranch Festival Copley, Valley Vista, and Bridge Gate during the
Ranch Festival. It is recommended that the area
have a limited access between 3:00 p.m. September
27 and 10:00 p.m. September 29, 1991. It is
further recommended that the Commission waive all
fees required for road closure.
VC/Gravdahl inquired where parking will be
permitted.
August 8, 1991 Page 2
AA/Aberra responded that parking will be permitted
on the empty lots, as well as along Copley.
Don Wise, Vice President of the Ranch Festival
Board, further specified the parking locations, as
well as the location of the Ranch Festival. He
informed the Commission that a shuttle service will
be provided to and from the Festival. The Rotary
Club will direct parking, as they have in the past.
Chair/Ortiz requested that the Rotary Club show
proof of insurance to protect the City from
liability.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Beke and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the closure subject
to staff's receipt of adequate assurances that the
liability issue has been taken care of.
Road Improvement:CE/Mousavi reported that the City has been working
Brea Cnyn. Rd. atwith Caltrans to improve the signal at the on/off
State Route 60 ramp at Brea Canyon Road at State Route 60
Westbound on/off Westbound. One of the requirements to install
ramps double left turns onto the on ramp is the
elimination of parking, as indicated on the map.
In order to complete their designs, Caltrans has
requested that they be formerly informed that this
has taken place. Staff requested the Commission's
approval to send this information to Caltrans, and
authorize them to proceed with the design.
C/Chavers suggested considering the elimination of
parking on the southbound approach to cure the
traffic on Colima at the same time.
The Commission discussed other proposed projects,
and the effects on this particular project.
CE/Mousavi stated that staff, at this time, is
requesting approval for the elimination of parking,
so the design can be completed. When it is
completed, it will be brought back to the
Commission. The Commission will also be kept
informed as more information is received regarding
other projects, enabling a more complete picture of
improvements in this area.
August 8, 1991 Page 3
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by C/Chavers
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's
recommendation.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Chavers, Fritz,
VC/Gravdahl, and
Chair/Ortiz.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None.
Circulation
CE/Mousavi introduced Kathy Higley, from DKS and
Element Study:
Associates. It is desired that the Commission
DKS & Assoc.
give a recommendation to the Council, with respect
to the Circulation Element Study, which can be
incorporated into the General Plan concept.
Kathy Higley stated that the emphasis on the entire
General Plan, and the Circulation Element, has been
on the environmental quality and the quality of
life issue, within Diamond Bar as a unique
community. Three fundamental premises were focused
on regarding the Circulation Element: 1) the
desire to return local streets to local use; 2)
maintain and improve Grand Ave. as an arterial; and
3) work closely with other agencies and surrounding
jurisdiction to insure that corollary improvements
are made on the regional systems. She reviewed
certain issues that will need reconciliation to
finalize the document and prepare it for the public
hearing. She then requested comments and direction
from the Commission.
The following comments were made by C/Beke:
C/Beke, referencing page 6, regarding Diamond Bar
Blvd. and Grand, stated that anything done to
reduce through traffic within the City will be an
inconvenience to the people in the City. If there
is a need for a bypass to the freeway, people will
take the path with the least resistance until the
freeway is improved.
C/Beke, regarding Sunset Crossing, stated that if
the intent to cul-de-sac the street is to keep
truck traffic from the City of Industry out, then
simply open the street and put a weight
restriction. Opening Sunset Crossing would be a
benefit to the City's circulation element.
C/Beke, referencing page 16, corrected the misuse
of Diamond Bar Hills Parkway and Diamond Bar Ave.
August 8, 1991 Page 4
7-1
C/Beke noted that the opening of Knoll/Tonner
Canyon Road was discussed in great detail at the
City Council meeting, but is not stressed in the
report.
Kathy Higley explained that this tends to be a
dividing issue among the GPAC. There is a
contingency that feels strongly that a Tonner
Canyon is needed from a traffic engineering
prospective. The argument from the other side is
that Tonner Canyon has a limited capacity which
will quickly fill up and return Grand Ave., and
Diamond Bar Blvd., as it is today, or worse.
However, the Canyon will have been forfeited.
C/Beke indicated that if Tonner Canyon is not
built, then traffic on Grand Ave. and Diamond Bar
Blvd., will continue to get much worse.
C/Beke commented that if this is to be the
Circulation Element, then it is a one sided
picture.
The following comments were made by C/Chavers:
C/Chavers concurred with C/Beke's opinion regarding
Grand Avenue. He suggested that a number one
policy should be to explore Tonner Canyon, and when
that is filled up, begin exploring Soquel Canyon.
The options to the south of us should be explored.
The Canyon shouldn't be preserved at the sake of
making Grand Ave. look like the 57 freeway.
C/Chavers, noting the inconsistencies within the
document, requested some technical discussion, from
staff, relating to the inclusion of level of
service standards and the definition of streets.
He suggested pulling some of the numbers out, and
replacing them with implementation figures, and
practice figures, that reflect Diamond Bar
standards.
C/Chavers commented on some of the problems of the
TIA guidelines document: the Circulation Element
recommends TRB 212, however, the TIA guidelines
request the use of the Intersection Capacity
Utilization Method; the TTA document has capacity
volumes for streets, but Diamond Bar should come up
with its own level of service, and the numbers
should be retracted until that time; and the Trip
Generation used in the model for the Diamond Bar
August 8, 1991 Page 5
circulation element is inconsistent relating to the
ITE rates required of developers to utilize the
TIA's. He suggested that the TIA guidelines be
revisited.
The following comments were made by VC/Gravdahl:
VC/Gravdahl stated that the City would have a
better bargaining tool if Sunset Crossing remained
closed. It is better to grab the bull by the horn
prior to, than after the fact, as it had happened
with Grand Avenue.
VC/Gravdahl inquired what the report addresses
regarding public transportation, or car pooling, in
Orange County, and how it is implemented.
Kathy Higley responded that Diamond Bar's most
sensible and cost effective measure will be to
continue to work with, and pressure, Caltrans to
implement car pool lanes along the 57 and 60
freeway, as well as improve the 60 freeway. Other
programs that can be effective are Park and Ride
Networks, van pools and car pools, biking and
subsidizing transit.
The following comments were made by C/Fritz:
C/Fritz stated that if people must travel through
Diamond Bar, then the traffic ought to be confined
to arterial streets and be kept off of residential
streets.
C/Fritz indicated that there should be more
emphasis on alternative modes of transportation.
In twenty years, we may not have to develop Soquel
Canyon, for example, because people are using
alternative modes in a way not foreseen today.
C/Fritz, regarding an article referring to the
purchasing of Union Pacific rights, inquired if it
referred to tracks that run on our City's border.
He suggested that the item be looked into further.
C/Chavers stated that LACTC leased right of way,
and leased the ability to operate commuter rail on
existing UP lines, which basically parallel Valley
Blvd.
C/Chaves inquired what affect the Commission's
comments have regarding the Circulation Element and
the public hearing process.
August 8, 1991
OLD BUSINESS:
Page 6
CE/Mousavi responded that the Commission is an
advisory board to the Council. The Commission's
comments and recommendations will be presented to
the Council for their determination.
The Commission concurred to have another meeting
later in the month to be able to provide their
comments to the Planning Commission, and allow time
for the revision of the draft Circulation Element.
The Commission also requested that DKS and
Associates highlight the changes and additions made
within the document.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Beke and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter to a
special session meeting of August 28, 1991 at 6:30
p.m.
Parking Spaces CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
at DBHS, Brea existing parking problem, at Brea Canyon Road and
Cnyn. & EvergreenEvergreen Springs, generated by students at Diamond
Bar High School(DBHS). C/Fritz had volunteered to
attend the next the School Board meeting to discuss
this matter.
C/Fritz stated that the School Board had not had a
meeting, however, Mr. Chapped, of the School
District, is present at tonight's meeting.
Mr. Chaput, Assistant Superintendent for Fiscal
Facilities Management with the School District
(WVUSD) , indicated that because of the successful
bond election there is now money to begin
construction on DBHS. The first project, to be
constructed by the end of January of 1992, is 113
parking spaces on the corner of Pathfinder and
Diamond Bar Boulevard. Toward the end of the
process, 67 spaces will be put in at the lower
level by Evergreen Springs, and 19 additional
spaces at the staff lot. The parking area on site
will basically be built out at that point.
C/Chavers suggested exploring the possibility of a
parking structure above the 113 lots that could be
tied into a Park and Ride lot.
The Commission directed staff to contact the LACTC
regarding the likelihood of getting a cooperative
Park and Ride with the school's parking facilities.
August 8, 1991 Pages 7
C/Fritz suggested that this item should be placed
on the agenda of the liaison group, consisting of 2
Council members and School Board members, as was
indicated by Mr. Chaput. .
Request for Stop CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
Control: Racquet request for a stop control at Racquet Club Road and
Club Rd./ Golden Golden Springs. The Racquet Club Road is a private
Springs Rd. road, and a signal would have to be paid for by the
Association. Staff did not begin preliminary
studies determining if a signal is warranted until
a commitment, regarding payment of a signal, has
been confirmed. Staff recommended, as an
alternative, a refuge area in the central part of
the street, within the striped area, for an easier
left turn.
C/Beke stated that if the City has the commitment
to fund a signal, the City may do the study.
C/Fritz suggested that the Association may wish to
try the refuge lane first before committing to a
warrant study.
Mr. Giamporcaro and Alice Mills, representing the
condominiums, had been under the impression that
the road was not a private road. After learning
otherwise, they indicated that they will discuss
the issue with the Association.
Motion was made by C/Chavers, seconded by C/Beke
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter
until a response is received from the Association.
Speed Zone Survey: CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
Chino Hills Pkwy. speed zone survey at Chino Hills Parkway. Staff
recommended that the Commission approve a 45 mph
speed zone.
Motion was made by C/Chavers, seconded by
VC/Gravdahl and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept
staff's recommendation.
Block Numbers on PMD/Daniel addressed the Commission regarding the
Bus Shelters suggestion, by Mayor Forbing, to use bus shelters
as a reference point for locating business
addresses within the community. Bus Stop Shelters,
Inc. has agreed to install the adhesive back type
of lettering on the single vertical post in front
of the bus shelter„ at no cost to the City.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Chavers
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept the project.
August 8, 1991 Page 8
C/Chavers suggested that the City place illuminated
numbers on the illuminated signs attached to the
mast arms, as they are replaced by the City.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to carry all items to the
Respectively,
Sid Mousavi
Secretary
.Attest:
meeting of August 28, 1991.
STAFF COMMENTS:
CE/Mousavi distributed brochures, regarding
a
workshop for Traffic Commissioners, put out by
the
City Traffic Engineers, and requested that he
be
contacted if any of the Commissioners
are
interested in attending it.
COMMISSION
C/Beke addressed the Commission regarding
the
COMMENTS:
opening of Pathfinder Road to Fullerton, around
December of 1991. He suggested that a design
for
an operational signal at Brea Canyon Road
and
Pathfinder be considered now. He asked staff
to
review a possible lead for a signal upon
the
opening of Pathfinder Road.
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting
at
8:53 p.m.
Respectively,
Sid Mousavi
Secretary
.Attest: