HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/10/1994r
PLANNING
0iss
� d .i_�• � L Y
{ ;1.
�t ra
7:00 P.M.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Chairman
Vice Chairwoman
Commissioner.
Commissioner
Commissioner
David Meyer
Lydia Plunk
,Bruce Ramenbaum
Ikon Schad
Franklin Fong
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Community
Development Office, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190,. and are available for public inspection.
If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the
City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accomodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community
Development Department at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinf
in the Auditorium
'he City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
. and encourages you to do the same.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
I-I'LANNING COMMISSION
Monday, ob• 1 1994
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Next Resolution No. 9421
ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman David Meyer, Vice Chairwoman
Lydia Plunk, Bruce Flamenbaum, Don Schad and Franklin Fong
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning
Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to
speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the
recordina_Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time
limit when addressing the Planning_ Commission.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS: None
4'
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1• Conditional Use Permit No. 94-3
This is a request to relocate an existing dry cleaning plant which
provides retail services to other dry cleaners as well as the general
public. The dry cleaner is moving to a different unit within the same
commerical center located on the northeast comer of Grand Avenue
in the Ralphs Center.
Property Location: 1164 Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA
91765
Applicant: Nikko Capital Corporation, 3961 Mac Arthur Blvd., Ste
105, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Property Owner: Same
IR
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has
determined that this project requires a Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning,
Commission open the public hearing, receive testimony and approve
the Negative Declaration and the attached PC Resolution with the
Findings of Fact and conditions listed.
2. Variance No. 94-2
A request to construct a new three story single family residence in
excess of the maximum 35ft. height limit.
Property Location: 1553 Deer Crossing, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Applicant: Frank Piermarini, 2100 Reservoir, Pomona, CA 91766
Property Owner: Jeff and Regina Jan 1553 Deer Crossing, Diamond
Bar, CA 91765
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has
3 1
determined that his project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to
15303 Class 3(a).
RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning
Commission open the public hearing, receive testimony, and adopt
the attached Resolution of Denial with the Findings of Fact.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
3. Verbal Status Report on the 1994 General Plan
ADJOURNMENT: October 17, 1994
2
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER*:
REPORT DATE: October 5, 1994 -
MEETING DATE: October 10, 1994
CASE/FILE NUMBER:
APPLICATION REQUEST:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PROPERTY OWNER/
APPLICANT'S AGENT:
APPLICANT:
BACKGROUND*
-
Conditional Use Permit No. 94-3
A request to relocate an existing dry
cleaning establishment which will
maintain a dry cleaning plant on the
premises,.'
1164 South-tDiaMond:Bar'Boililevard.
Nikko Capital Corp.
3961 MacArthur Blvd., Ste. 105
Newport Beach,..CA 92660
Nobuo Okumura
25812 Maple View Dr.
Laguna Hillst CA 92653
The applicant -is requesting an approval. to relocate an existing dry
cleaning establishm--_-1'5t currently located at 1164 Diamond Bar Blvd.,in
the Ralphs Center at ' the. southeast corner ot'Grand -Ave.. and Diamond Bar
Blvd., to a different unit within the denter. The applicant has
operated the plant on-site since the shopping center opened. The
relocation is related to the opening of a Blockbuster Video store that
will be located in the applicant's former unit.
The proposed project- is located.in a C -3 -BE (Unlimited Commercial -
Billboard Exclusion)' Zone. A dry cleaning establishment is allowed in
this' tone by right. Upon processing the tenant improvement the
applicant informed the City that the plant operates as.a retail plant
taking in business from other dry cleaners. Pursuant to the City -Is
Zoning Code, Section 22.28.210, retail dry cleaning plants are required
to acquire a Conditional Use Permit. In the. intervening period"that the
application has been. processing, the applicant has been in operation
and the dry cleaning plant has been operational for providing services
for,his.customers only.
The 9.49 acre center is one of four commercial strip centers situated
at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Diamond Bar Blvd. Two banks
C.1U=MMMVRMCUPJ4-3 - - 1
complement the development on this corner. One bank is located on a
separate parcel, although ingress and egress are shared between the
bank and the commercial center. There are a total of four access
points to the center, two on both frontages to Grand Ave. and Diamond
Bar Blvd. The proposed development would be located proximate to the
the Whole Enchilada and to the, east of Ralphs grocery store at the
northeastern end of the center.
Generally, the following land uses surround the subject site: to the
north and east is R-1-8,000 (Single Family Residential- 8,000 sq. ft.
min. lot size), R-3-8,000 (15U) and R-3-8,000 (30U) (Residential
Planned Development -8,000 sq. ft. min. lots -15 - and 30 units
respectively) zone;, to the west and south is C -3 -BE (Unlimited
Commercial -Billboard Exclusion)
APPLICATION ANALYSIS:
The proposed dry cleaning establishment will be located in a unit of
approximately 1,330 square feet and is adequate in size for the
proposed use. The main equipment to be utilized, includes one (1) dry
cleaning• unit, four (4) pressing units for the different types of
garments to be pressed, a spotting board, and conveyors to hang and
move clean articles of clothing. There is an existing 42 in. exterior
water tower. The maximum number of employees will be four (4). 'Hours
of -operation will be Monday through Friday, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and
Saturday from 8 a.m.-to,6 p.m.
The required and provided number of parking spaces for the center is
436. This project will not impact the parking requirements currently
imposed on the center as the use is a relocation and confirmation of an
existing use. Egress and ingress to this shopping center is adequate
.fora the proposed use.
The signage for
r the proposed dry dr cleaning establishment is -not included
as part of this approval process.
The South Coast Air. Quality Management District,, (SCAQMD) requires an
air pollution control permit. to operate a dry cleaning plant. This
permit is issued for the purpose of controlling the amount of Perchlor-
ethylene that is released into the atmosphere during the dry cleaning
process. This permit is renewed annually and records concerning the
dry cleaning process must be available to the SCAQMD for review whenev-
er requested, The applicant has applied for and received all required
permits.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The proposed use has been determined to not pose a significant impact
on the environment. The staff has prepared a Negative Declaration
according to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
c.vxnnsuwmRntcunm 2
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
The was advertised on September 16, 1994 in the -San Gabriel
Valley --Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers.
Notices were mailed to 23.3 property owners within a 500 foot radius of
the project on September 20, 1994.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public
hearing, receive testimony and approve the Negative Declaration and the
attached draft PC. Resolution 94 -XX with the Findings of Fact and
conditions listed.
Findings of -Fact:
1. The proposed project is in substantial compliance with the
Proposed General Plan pursuant to the terms and. provisions of
Government Code Section 65360.
2. The proposed project will not adversely affect the health or
welfare of persons residing or.working in the surrounding area.
3. The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on adjacent
or adjoining residential and commercial uses. It will not be
materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment, or valuation of
property of other persons located in the vicinity of the proposed
project.
4.,- The subject 'site for the proposed project is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the proposed used.
5.' the proposed site is, adequately served by Diamond Bar -Boulevard.
It has good visibility, easy access, and adequate parking for the
proposed project.
Report Prepared by:
Robert Searcyi Associate Planner
Attachments:
Application
Initial Study
Negative Declaration
Draft Resolution of Approval
Plans
CAUMMUW"MICUM" 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
APPROVING . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 943 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 94-59 AN APPLICATION FOR A DRY CLEANING
ESTABLISHMENT WITH A RETAIL DRY CLEANING PLANT ON THE PREMISES
AT 1164 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. AND XMKI TG. FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
TRF.RFAF.
A. RECITALS.
(i) Nikko Capital Corporation, acting as the agent for Nobuo Okumura, 25812 Maple
View Dr., Laguna Hills, CA 92653 has filed an application for Conditional Use
Permit (CUP, as listed in the title of this Resolution, for property located at 1164 S.
Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, California, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit
application is referred to as "the Application".
(ii) On April 18, 1989; the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized
municipal corporation of the State of California. Thereafter, the City -Council of the
City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 14 (1990), thereby adopting the Los
Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of
the Los Angeles County Code contain the Development Code of the County of Los
Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, including the subject
Application, within the- City of Diamond Bar.
(iii) The City of Diamond gar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, action was
taken on the subject application, as. to consistency td the future adopted General Plan,
pursuant to the terms and provisions of an Office of Planning and Research Extension
granted pursuant to California Government Code Section 65361.
(iv) On October 10, 1994 the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said .public hearing on
that date..:.
B. Resolution.
Now, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
c:UTrBR UWAVMICUr9i3 1
DRAFT
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
_._
2.. The Planning Commission. hereby. finds that .the project has been determined that a
Negative Declaration has been prepared and presented for the review and approval by
this Commission in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and the: Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to section
15301(e)(1) of Division 13 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
3. The Community Development Director hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and
changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the
proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before the Community
Development Director that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an
adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
Based upon substantial evidence, the Community Development. Director hereby rebuts
the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of. Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations.
4. Based on substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the public hearing,
and by written and oral testimony provided at the hearing, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The Application applies to property presently zoned C -3 -BE, located at 11164 S.
Diamond Bar Blvd.;
(b) Generally, the property to the north of the subject site is zoned R-1-8,000; to the
south of the subject site is zoned C -3 -BE;' to the east of the subject site is zoned
R=3 -8,000(15U) and R -3-8,000-30U; and west of thu.subject site is zoned C -3 -
be. ..
(c) The surrounding properties are developed with similar commercial centers and
single family and multiple family residences abut the project to the east.
(d) Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on September 16,
1994 and 232 property owners within 500 feet of the project site were notified
by mail.
(e) The Application is for the operation of a dry cleaning plant on-site in an existing
dry cleaning facility .
(f) The nature, condition, and size of the site has been considered and determined to
satisfy all applicable standards.
(g) There is substantial evidence in the record that the "Application" is consistent
with the proposed contemplated draft General Plan and specific plans as specified
in Section 65451 and will not be detrimental to or interfere with the preparation
of the future adopted General Plan.
0) That the site is physically suitable for the type of .development.
(i) That the Conditional Use Permit is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or.substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
(j) Notwithstanding any previous Subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of
Fish and Game requires payment of a fee pursuant to Section 711.4 of the Fish
and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the applicant prior to the
issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement.
5. ..Based on* the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1; 2, 3, and 4
above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application subject to the
following restrictions as to use:
(a) This project shall substantially conform to all plans dated October 10, 1994 as
submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission labeled Exhibit "A" as
stated herein.
(b) This grant allows for a dry cleaning establishment with a dry cleaning plant on
the premises.
(c) Hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and
Saturday 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The hours of operation for dry cleaning equipment
shall be 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
(d) All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City and South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
(e) The development approved'by this Resolution shall be substantially completed
within one (1) year of date of approval. A year extension may be requested in
writing prior to the expiration day -of this grant.
(f) Notwithstanding any previous Subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of
Fish and Game requires payment of a fee pursuant to Section 711.4 of the Fish
c:LErrERSIRs W"Icr pma 3
and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the applicant prior to the
issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement.
(g) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of
the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, at the City of
Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that
they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant.
6. The Planning Commission Secretary is hereby directed to:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution and,
(b) . Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return
receipt requested, to Nikko Capital Corp. and Nobuo Okimara at thd addresses on file with the
City.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 10th day of October, 1994
Chairman
I, .James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduCed, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Diamond Bar, at a regular me dng of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of
October, 1994, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:,
James DeStefano, Secretary
C. tE77MUMPOMICUPOM 4
case Number: Conditional Use Permit No. 94-3
Applicant: Nobuo Okumura
25812 Maple View Dr.
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Proposal: A request to relocate a dry cleaning establishment which
will have a retail dry cleaning plant on the premises.
Location: 1164 Diamond Bar Blvd.
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Environmental
Findings: The proposedproject, as determined in the City of
Diamond Bar, will not have a significant negative impact
on the environment."
II. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation:
Negative Declaration
Explanation- to supplement "yes" and - "possible"- answers criven—i
Environmental Impacts:
2. Air. Will the.proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air quality? Possibly
Explanation•
Five gallons of Perchloroethylene a month is converted
into still residue after the cleaning process is
completed.
Mitigation:
The South Coast Air Quality. Management District requires
dry cleaning establishments to obtain an pollution
control permit with conditions to control the still
residue created from Perchloroethylene. This permit
must be renewed annually. Also, the owner of such an
establishment shall keep records which must be available
to SCAQMD upon request.
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset condition?Possibly.
Explanation:
It is possible when chemicals are involved that an upset
of conditions may occur.
Mitigation:.
The machinery used for this proposed poject has built in
safety devices. Some of theses devices are fault alarm
and indicator lights, anti -freeze safety device., and
automatic solvent cooling.
Perchloroethylene, a chemical used during the dry
cleaning process, will be stored' in sealed metal
containers and is disposed in accordance with -local,
state, and federal regulations by a licensed waste
hauler.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:•
a.. creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? -Possibly.
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazard?
. Possibly.
Explanation:
a.& b. It is possible that., the chemical
Perchlorethylene could be a potential health
hazard to people e;tposed to it.
Miticlatig. n:.
a.& b. This type of business requires a permit from
AQMD to monitor the storage, . waste hauling.
As -a result,. any hazards that could be
possibly are kept to a minimum.
C.V.GrAMUUU1OM1CLWW . 2
21660. EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177
714-860-2489 • FAX 714-861-3117
1. Background:
1. Name of.AppGcant:
2- Address and Phone Num ropor�nt:
G
3. Name, Address and hone of ProjectContact:
4. bate- of ironrme ~1 Information Submittal:
5. Date of Environmental Checklist Submittal:
6. Least Agencf (Agencr.Eiec : `ring Checkrt4
7. Na a of Proposal ii appGcabte s i ract No. if Su6divis:on • ?
—'
_ r
S. Related Applications (under the authority of this environmental determination):
Yes No
Variance:
CQndltlonal Use Permit: �-''-
Zone Change: — z----
General Plan Amendment:
(Afiach Ccrhpleted Eavlronmental lnformatlon Fane)
11. Environmental Impacts:
(Explanatlons and addition/ Informatlan to supplement all 'des" and "possibly"
answers are requtred to be
submlited an attached sheets)
yes No Possibly
1. Earth. Will the proposal result In:
/
y
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
v.
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature?
t/
e. Arty increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or oft the site?
f. Changes in deposition, erosion of stream banks or land adjacent to standing water,
changes in siltation, deposition or other processes which may modify the channel of
as -the surrounding permanent
constant orintermittently flowing water as well areas
or intermittent standing water?
g._ Exposes of people or property to geologic hazards such s earthquakes, landslides,
_
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2 Air. Will the proposal result In:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation -of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any changes in climate,
either locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result In:
a. Changes in currents or the course or direction oi!water movements?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface nun -off?
c. Alterations of the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any body of water? —
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality including but
not limited to dissolved oxygen and turbidity?.
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?g. Change Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? / =—
i. Exposure of people or, property to water related hazards such as flooding? 1�
City of Diamond Bar &.7/t/al StudY Form
T., Page 3
1. plant Life VVIII the proposal result W. X"
L Change in the d'iversi'ty of species, or number of any species of Plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of plants?
or plant communities which are recognized
size of sensitive habitat areas
c. Reduction in the s
as sensitive?
Plants BUD cul or in a barrier to the normal
& Introduction of new species Or 1 .20)
replenishment of existing sPecie,s 4
e. Reduction In acreage of any agricultural crop . ?
S. Animal Uje_ Vail the proposal result In:
d* of species, or number of any
species of 'animals (birds, land
a. Chan n the diversity benth Pc organisms and insects)?
animals reptiles, fish and shellfish,
i s in es, 44,
b. Reduction in the numbers of any dnique rare or endangered species of. animals?
C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the normal migration
or movement of resident species?
d. Reduction in size or deterioration in quality Of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise- Will the Proposal result in:
...,000000000;�
a. Significant increases in existing. noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels
7. Light and Glare. W111 the proposal result In:
cantly o existing levels of right and glare'? .................
a. Signirlqalt new light and, glare or contribute signffl Y t
s. Land Use. Will the proposal result In:
a. A substantial alteration of the prOsent or planned land. use in an area?
9. Natural Resources. will the proposal result In:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
10. Risk of UPSGt- V61-11 the Proposal Involve: ring but not rimited
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (inclue
to, oil, pesticides,,chernicals or radiation) in the event of an . accident or upset condition?
response plan or an . emergency mergency evacuationptgn?
b. Probable Interference with an emergency
city of Dlamond Bar Initlal Study �
yes No Possibly
,,.population. WIll the proposal: ,
a Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? —._-=--
12 Housing. Wilfthe proposal affect:
a. Existing housing. or create a -demand for additional housing?
13. TransportationlClrculation. Wtll the proposal result In:
a.•Generation of Substantial additional vehicular movement? ' —
b. Effects on existing ping facilities or demand for new parking .
act on existing transportation
c. Substantial imp rtation systems?
d. Atte.rations.to present pattems of circulation or movement of people and goods.., —._---
e, Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? _
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycGsts or pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal:
a. Have an effect upon, or result in the need foe new or altered govemrfiental services in any
of the following areas:
1. Fre protection?
2. Police protection? l/
3. Schools?
4., paries or other recreational facilities?
5. Maintenance of public faciiitfes, including roads? -
6, Other governmental services?
18. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substaritiai amourds ot: fuel or energy17 rre the development
b. Substantia! increase in demand upon existing energy sources or requ /
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Ivan the proposal result In:
a A need for new systems, or Substantial alterations to public utilities?
T
City of Diamond Bar!nitW Study Form
Prge 5
Yes No Possibly
17. Human Health.. Will the proposal result In: -
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure pf people to potential health hazards? '
18: Aesthetics. Will the proposal resultIn:
a. The obstruction of any: scenic vista or view open to the pdblIc, or will the proposal result in
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result In:
a. An.impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?.
20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result In:
a The alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site!
b. AdverseP hysical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object?-
c. A physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions on existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
Cl-
y of D/amond BarWtlal Study Form
Page 8 ..
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance? of the environment,
a_ Does the proposed project have the�psotential to degrade the qualify
substaniialh/ ceduc the roh belowose .suhsWningt levels, threaten to elimiinate or r
wldtife'population P reduce the number or restrict
significantly reduce a plant or animal community.
the range of a rare or
the major pends of Cered pat of or �oryoor Prehistory?
examples o
project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
b. Does the proposed
of long-term, environmental goals?
Does; the proposed project pose impacts which are individually Gmiied but cumulatively
c•considerable?
d. Does the project hose environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse
effects on humanberngs, either directly or Indirectly?
III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation:
(Attach' Narrative)
Yes Nd_-____- Possibly
tV. Detenninatlon: i r ..._ _.._ .... .
On the basis of this initial evaluation: s nificant effect on the environment,
1 find that the prngosed Prd1ec_t�t COULD NOT have
and aNEG- TiVE DECEA TION will be prepared.a environment.
1 find that although the proposed project cautd have a significant effect on the
there will not be a signficanteffect �n roorated into the proposed project -a the mitigation e measures descrioec
on the attached sheet have
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find that the proposed project MAY av T is significant
gni i cent effect on the environment,
ENVIRONM AL, IMPACT /
Signature:,:/
Date* �B.
Title _____a
Forthe City of Diam
V//
INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Applicant (Owner): Proiect Representative:
Nikko Capital Corp.
NANM
3961 MacArthur Blvd., #105
ADDRESS
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(714) 852-0651 -
PHONE I
(staff use)
PROJECT NUMBER(s):
Nobua Okumura
NAME
25812 Maple View Dr.
ADDRESS
..Laguna Hills, CA 92653
(714)348-$192
PHONE A
1. A c t i 0 n r e. q u e s t e d a n d p r o j e c t
description: Relocate an existing dry cleaning store with plant
from 1184 to 1164 South Diamond Bar Blvd.
2. Street location of project: 1164 So. Diamond Bar Blvd.
3a. Present use of site: Vacant
3b'. Previous use of site or structures: Wallpaper store
4."' Please list all previous cases
(if any) related to this -project: None
5. Other related permittapprovals required.
Specify type and granting agency. Air- pollution permit SCAQMD
6. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y
If yes, explain:
7. Project Area:
Cbveredby structures, paving: 99,673 s . f . (structures)
Landscaping, open space: 313,,500 S.f. (open spacd)*
Total Area: 413,173 s . f .
*see attached site plan for landscaping
.8. Number of floors: 1
9. Present zoning: C -3 -B-E
10. Water and sewer service: Water Sewers
Domestic
Public
Does service exist at site?
If yes, do purveyors have
capacity to meet demand of
project and all other approved
projects?
l:/ N
0.N
Y _ N
Y N
If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services be
provided?
Residential Projects:
11. Number and type of units:
12. Schools:
What school district(s) serves the property?
Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs?
YES NO
If not, what provisions will be made for additional
classrooms?
Non -Residential projects:
13. Distance. to nearest ' residential use. 'or sensitive- use (school, hospital,
etc.) less .-t: an 300 feet
14. Number and floor area of buildings: 8 -buildings -- 99,,'673 s . f .
15. Number of employees and shifts: 4 employees -- 1 shift
16. Maximum employees per shift: 4
17. Operating hours- 7:00 a. m. — 7 :'0 0 pm Mon—Fri 8:00 a. m. — 6:00 p.m.
Saturday
18. Identify any: End products
Waste products from dry cleaning
Means of disposal by a licensed disposal company
AAD Disposal Co.
19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides,
chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials?
ES NO.
If yes, explain soap detergent, oils and some perchlorethylene
20. Do your operations require any pressurized tanks?
YES NO
If yes, explain A steam boiler, boile_7 is UL listed and
ASME pressure vessel approved.
21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site.
None
22. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway?
YES NO
If yes, explain
B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
1. Environmental Setting—Project Site
a. Existing use/structures Retail Shopping Center
b. Topography/slopes Existing buildings and parking sloped to drain
*c. Vegetation
*d. Animals
*e.. - Watercourses
f. Cultural/historical resources Windmill
g. .. Other.; -
2. Environmental Setting — Surrounding Area 1 *4
a. Existing uses structures (types, densities):
Retail shopping centers and single family residences
Topography/slopes
Existing buil.dIngs and parking sloped, t6 drain
*c. Vegetation
*d. Animals
*e. Watercourses
f. Cultural/historical resources None
9- Other
3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees?
YES NO.
If yes, type and number:
4.Will any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns, etc., be changed through project
. development?:
YES NO
If yes, explain:
* Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land.
5. Grading:
Will the project require grading? YES NO
If yes, how many cubic yards?
Will it be balanced on site? YES NO
If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited?
6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including
uncompacted fill)?
YES NO
If yes, explain:
,7. Is the property located: , ! thin a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately densevegetation)?
YES NO ,
Distance to nearest fire station: One-fourth mile
8. Noise:
Existing noise sources at site: _
Noise to be generated by project:
9. Fumes:
None
None
Odors generated by project: None
Could toxic fumes be generated? No
10. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used?
Complies with California Title 24 requirements. Batt
...,,, -a-; �r =rA i nw-.iii „mc' water closet to be installed.
CERTIFICATION: I he certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of
my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
July 1, 1994
Date Signature
For: Nikko Capital Corp.
CITY CF DIAMOND BAR
DEPAR'T'MENT OF PLANNING
21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190
(909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Case#-� �3,
Recv4-,-
Deposit $
, g2�0
Receipt pSM&I
By
Record Owner(s) Applicant Applicmt's Agent
5 -Mr -i .('714)152 -
Name Nikko Capital Corp. Nikko Capital Corp. Nobuo Okumura
(Last name first)
Address3961 MacArthur Blvd. (same) 258-12 Maple View Dr.
Suite 105
city Newport Beach, CA Laguna Hills, CA
Em
92653
• Phone(714) 852-0651 (714) 852-0651 (714) 348-8192
(Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures
of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations)
CONSENT: X consent to the submission of the application accompanying this request
Signed e Date July 1, 1994
MT—recorded owners)
Certification: X, the undersigned, hereby certify unddi� penalty of perjury that
the I information herein provided is correct to the best of my, knowledge.
Printed Name: Nobuo Okumura
(Applicant or Agent)
signed Date July 1, 1994
(Applicant- or-Agentl--
'Location .1164 South Diamond Bar Blvd*."
(Street address-or–tract–aiid Lot.number)
Zoning, C -3 -B-E Hgm 111-345
Previous Cases NONE
Present Use of Site Retail Shopping Center
useappliedfor Relocation of existing dry cleaner. to Suite 1164.
All existing equipment, provided that it meets current coder
to be relocated.If it does not meet code,,it.will be replaced
with new.
Project Size (gross acres) -9.49, acres Project density
Domestic Water Source Company/DistrictWalnut. Valley Water
Method of Sewage disposal,
Sanitation District L.A. County__
Grading of Lots by Applicant? Yes No X
(Show necessary grading design an site plan or tent map)
APPROPRIATE BURDENS OF PROOF MUST ACCOMPANY REQUEST
LEGAL. DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lot(s)/parcel(s)
See attached Exhibit "A-1"
Area devoted to structures Landscaping/open space
Residential Project: and
(gross area) (No. of lots)
Proposed density
(Units Acres)
Parking Required 43.6 Provided 436
• standard 428 428
Compact
Handicapped 8 8
Total 436 43 6
RECEIVED COMMUNITY
J i L
2 P11 3: 15
July 12, 1994
City of Diamond Bar
Department of Planning
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar,'CA 91765-4177
Re: conditional Use permit Application # 94-3
1184 and 1164 So. Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA
Dear Sir/Madam:
In connection with the above application and until the
issuance of a Conditional Use Permit., this letter -shall serve
to certify that the above referenced premises will be used
only for retail sales to customers and no wholesale work will
be performed for other dry cleaners. -
Sincerely,
Jong on Shin
One Hour Cleaners
1184 South Diamond Bar Blvd.
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
r
EXHIBIT "A-1 "
Legal Description of the Shopping Center
PARCELS. 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 10252, .COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 127 PAGES 97 AND 98 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS AND MINERALS NOW OR AT ANY TIME
HEREINAFTER SITUATED THEREIN AND THEREUNDER, TOGETHER WITH THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
DRILL FOR, PRODUCE, EXTRACT, TAKE AND MINE THEREFROM, SUCH OIL, GAS AND OTHER
HYDROCARBONS AND MINERALS AND TO STORE THE SAME UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR
BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, TOGETHER.WITH THE RIGHT TO STORE UPON THE SURFACE OF
SAID LAND, OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS AND MINERALS WHZCH MAY BE PRODUCED FROM
OTHER LANDS, WITH THE RIGHT OF ENTRY THEREON FOR SAID PURPOSES AND WITH THE RIGHT TO
CONSTRUCT, USE, MAINTAIN, ERECT, REPAIR, REPLACE AND REMOVE THEREON AND THEREFROM ALL
PIPE LINES, TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES, TANKS, MACHINERY BUILDINGS AND OTHER
STRUCTURES, WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY AND REQUISITE TO CARRY ON OPERATIONS OF SAID LAND,
WITH THE FURTHER RIGHT TO ERECT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE AND REMOVE A PLANT, WITH ALL
NECESSARY RIGHTS NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT• THERETO, AS RESERVED IN DEED.FROM
TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RECORDED MARCH 28,_1968 IN BOOK
D3955 PAGE 185, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND RE-RECORDED. JUNE 19, 1969 IN BOOK D4407 PAGE
591, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND AS MODIFIED BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1977 AS INSTRUMENT
N6. 77-1165771, IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS WHICH RELINQUISHED ALL RIGHTS TO THE USE OF
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND.
N
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
MEETING DATE:
CASEXILE NUMBER:
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
d? -
October 4, 1994
,October 10, 1994
Variance No. 94-2
APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to construct a 7,808 sq. ft. single family residence in
excess of the 35 ft. height limit and three story limitation, on a
1.9 acre site that currently is developed with an abandoned
foundation and frame.
Fw:all
s 4
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
BACKGROUND:
22104 Rimfire Lane
Frank Piermarini
2100 S. Reservoir
Pomona, CA 91766
Jeff and Regina Jan
1553 Deer Crossing
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
An abandoned foundation and frame are currently located on-site. The abandonment of the previously
approved plans for the single family, residence approved by Regional Planning in 1989 prior to
incorporation, is the result of litigation surrounding a violation of CC&Rs and subsequent litigation
that ruled the residence in construction encroached into the 10 ft. CC&R required setback. As such,
construction halted and no activity has taken placed on the site for several years..
The residential plans submitted to and approved by Regional Planning exhibited a two story single
family residence in compliance with codes in effect at the time and which were adopted by the City of
Diamond Bar upon incorporation and extend to this day. The project was approved with substantially
less square footage than the currently proposed 7,800 sq. ft. residence.
APPLICATION ANALYSIS:
The subject site can be characterized as a hillside lot with slopes ranging from 2:1 to 1.5:1 as the lot
falls westward into a ravine. The lot possesses a flood hazard area that extends along two thirds of
C:\LETTERS\REPORTS\VAR94-2.STY i
the western property line. Additionally, approximately 73 percent of the site is within a Restricted
Use Area. Together these areas establishes a large degree of development restrictions on the site. The
project site has stands of oak trees located at the rear of the property, down slope from the existing
foundation. The remainder of the site is covered with natural grasses. The site possesses an
extremely limited level area which is located adjacent to the street and does not provide an area
capable of supporting habitable structures.
The proposed residence is a design which is based on utilizing the foundation currently located on-site.
The applicant has stated that it would be, cost prohibitive to design a project that would require the
alteration, modification, of removal of the foundation. The submitted design therefore incorporates
the existing footprint but seeks to substantially increase the square footage of the residence. In order
for this to occur, the applicant's design increases the number of stories and the overall height of the
structure.
Within the confines of the submitted project, the applicant has added amenities such as an indoor
swimming pool, exercise room, sauna, guest room and wet bar on the bottom level and the addition of
a covered patio The applicant is also proposing storage area under the stairs and along the southern
elevation. The residence provides a master suite, additional bedrooms, and a library on the top floor
and a three car garage, great room, kitchen, dining room and living room are proposed for the main
floor.
The 'exterior, materials presented for the residence include a stone - veneer front elevation with La
Habra "X-23 Aspen" plaster siding. The wood trim will be Dunn Edwards "240 -Expresso" and the
roof material is proposed as Country Slate taupe concrete tile. The arched entrance will display
.double front doors with glass insets. There is a bay window located just off the front door which is
incorporated into the living room.. There are two fireplace chimneys located on either side of the
residence. The roof is designed with a 12:12 pitch which adds significantly to the overall height of
.the, proposed structure.
The rear elevation of the is residence is massive. This elevation exposes in excess of 65 feet of
building face. The applicant has provided a preliminary landscape plan which does not provide
enough specific information to determine the extent to which the visual'impact could be reduced. The
side elevations exhibit over 50 feet of structure and the landscape plan also does not adequately
address the immediate benefits of the incorporation of plant materials.
The applicant did not provide a calculation for the average finished grade (AFG) which is a
calculation used for the basis of height measurement. As such, staff calculated the AFG, and has
determined that the proposed structure is approximately 50 ft. above this line of demarcation and more
than 60 to 65 feet above grade over the majority of the residence. The zoning core restricts the
height of residential structures to 35 ft. above AFG and a maximum of two stories and a cellar. The
proposed height does not conform to the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted and implemented
by the City. Pursuant to the UBC, there is a three (3) story limit, per Table 5-D, "Maximum Height
in Stories".
Within "The Country" there are many parcels which exhibit similar qualities and topographic features
C:\LETTERS\REPORTS\VAR94-2.STY
2
to the subject siie. Adjacent residences have not been constructed in a similar fashion to tlds proposed
house. A review of the Planning Department files does not indicate that any modifications to height
restrictions have been granted in the immediate area of this project site.
Since incorporation, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission has taken action on two single family
residential projects that requested relief from the height standard imposed on structures. The Planning
Commission approved the first application in 1990 for a residence which averaged 39 ft. above AFG
or 11 percent over the code limitation. The Commission admonished staff that every effort should be
made to work with applicants to develop a project that conforms to development standards, particular
as they relate to height. The Commission also went on record as stating that a Variance application
asking for relief based on the design of the project rather than because of the extreme peculiarities the
site were not seen to be valid.
The second variance request for a single family residence met the 35 ft. height limit but did not
conform to the number of stories pursuant to the zoning code and the UBC, and exhibited 56 ft. above
natural grade. The application was denied by the Commission with stated findings that the request
had not met the test of establishing evidence that denial of the variance would place an undue
restriction or burden on the property owner and that approval would grant a benefit not enjoyed by
other properties. This decision was based on_the applicant's assertion that to redesign the project
would not deliver the desired product and the applicant's refusal to look at alternative scenarios.
The applicant presented this project to staff for a preliminary review and received comments relating
to the project not being designed. to code requirements. The applicant then submitted a Variance
application for the project to the City.
Grading
The..applicant is not proposing any grading or retaining walls as a part of this project. In the absence
of grading and the provision of retaining walls, the site will provide for limited pad area for recreation
except in the front, yard area.
Conclusion:
Staff has found the project to not be in conformance with the developed standards applied within the
City. Although the site presents topographic difficulties, the approval and initiation of construction on
a previously project confirm the fact that a design, in conformance with development standards, can
be attained. The Planning Commission has approved one Variance application for relief of the height
restrictions fora project which exceeded the development standard by an average of four feet. In a
subsequent review, the Commission held that the applicant must make every effort to conform to the
code, with considerations for topography being taken into account.
This project is not within the range that the previous applications presented to the Commission have
fallen. The subject application presents a design request that exceeds the previously granted and
denied applications. Staff has reviewed the project and offered suggestions and recommendations to
the applicant on the project which sought to reduce the negative aspects of the design.
C:\LETTERS\REPORTS\VAR94-2.STY
3
Staff also has a concern that if the Planning Commission were to approve a request of this magnitude,
staff would be faced with several applications that reflect a similar design or request for relief: Staff
can not support this variance application in light of the policies and development standards which have
been codified in ordinances such as the Hillside Management Ordinance and approval of projects such
as the JCC/Diamond Ridge Development and most recently, the Yeh Development project. These
actions clearly sought to limit massive home construction by maximizing pad sizes, limiting retaining
walls, and implementing increased setbacks from the top of slopes and building pads.
ENVIRO NT ASSESSNWNT:
Staff has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) section 15303.
This application was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune
on September 16, 1994. Thirty (30) property owners within a 300 foot radius of the site were mailed
notices of the public hearing on September 20, 1994.
That the requested use at the location proposed will not:
(a) That because of special circumstances or exception characteristics applicable to the
property, the strict application of the code deprives such property of privileges enjoyed
by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning, classification; and
(b) That the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with -he limitations, upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which
the property is situated; and
(c) That strict application of the -zoning regulations as they apply to such property will
result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general
purpose of such regulations and standards; and
(d) That such adjustment
welfare, or to the use,
the vicinity.
V1610 10 11 ., i
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general
enjoyment or valuation of property of .other persons located in
The staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, receive testimony, and
adopt the attached Resolution of Denial with the Findings of Fact.
C:\LETTERS\REPORTS\VAR94-2.STY
4
PREPARED BY:
Robert Searcy, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Application
Site Plan
Draft Resolution of Denial.
C:\LETTERS\REPORTS\VAR94-2.STY
5
CITY OF DIAMOND, -BAR
DEPARTMENT OF INNING
21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190
(714)396-5676 Fax (714)861-3117
VtMANCE APPLICATION
Record Owner(s)
Namelj-fat�'
[Las tnime first
Case#
File
--Fre $ SCIO
Receipt I
B
Applicant Applicant's Agent
Address /Iry :51 e�
City
Zip 41 &
Phone
(Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures
of members -of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.)
CONSENT:
request.
R
x consent to the submission of the application accompanying this
owners
Dat
CERTIFICATION: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty c�f perjury that
the information herein provided is correct.to the best of my knowledge.
Printed N
Locat
cant or
reet addrel-, or tract
between.ZZ,,2,!2!,0x) -r404-1.f—) and
I (street)
1,Y7-gc
(Street)
2
Date
-- 7--
Zoning_ Citi, CCO HNM
Project Size (gross acres) 10 Project Density
Previous Cases
PresentUseof Site ekSz.0 4W 7244 --
Use applied for � L) '5 7-,6 /;p
Domestic Water Source
Method of Sewage Disposal
Company/District
Sanitation District
__I
In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall
substantiate to the satisfaction of the Zoning Board and/or Commission, the
following facts:
A. That the requested use at the location proposed will not:
1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare or persons
residing or working.in the surrounding area, or
2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of
property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or
3. 'Jeopardize, endanger or other wise constitute a menace to the public
health, safety or general welfare.
A'Y
NONE FO THE ABOVE*WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT
B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities; landscaping and other
development features prescribed in this Ordinance, .or as is otherwise
required- in order to integrate said use with the uses. in the surrounding
area.
.YES IVIS ADEQUAGE.
C. That the proposed site is adequately served:
1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary
to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate,
and
2. By other public or private service facilities as are required.
D. . That there are special circumstances or exceptional characteristics
applicable to the property involved, such as size. shape, topography,
lucation or surroundings, which are not generally applicable to other
properties in the same vicinity and under identical zoning classification.
TOPOGRAPHY MAAS LOT UNUSEABLE FOR POOLE OR
RECREATION YARD. SEE "D11 BELOW.
E. That such variance is necessary for the, preservation of a substantial
property right of the applicant such as that possessed by owners of other
property in the same vicinity and zone.
YES
F. That the granting of the variance will not. be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or be injurious to other property or improvements in
the same vicinity and zone.
YES. NEIGHBORS AGREE WITH DESIGN.
DBCEA ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE HAS APPROVE PROJECT
(SEE COPY ATTACHED).
SLOPES EXCEED 1-112:1. DUE TO THE SEVERITY OF TOPOGRAPHY, THE
YARD ON THIS PROPERTY BECOMES UNUSEABLE. THE.."CELLAR OR LOWER
FLOOR BECOMES THE LOST YARD (SO TO SPEAK) AND RECREATION AREA FOR
THIS ktSIDENCE.,
FROM MY 21 YEARS EXPERIENCE OT BUILDING IN THE,"COUNTRY ESTATES"
AND FROM AN ECONOMIC STANDPOINT, THE VALUE OF.THE RESIDNECE, WOULD
BK DELUTED IF BUILT WITHOUT THE CELLAR AS DESIGNED AND•THE OWNERS
ARE NOT WILLING'TO MOVE FORWARD IF THE DESIGN DOES NOT MEET
THEIR CRITERIA. THEREFORE,,THE LOT BECOMESWORTHLESS WITHOUT
AN APPROVAL AND THE EXISTING FOUNDATION REMAINS AN EYESORE TO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
I-
Staff Use
Project No.
INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Applicant (Owner): Project Representative:
11'111
PUS,
- NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS .�
_,r'�'i� ,J 4, ,
10
PHONE # PHONE #
1. Action rec}uested and .protect description: 3 STORY.OME
5 (ABOVE -35' HT.) VARIANCE REQUESTED.
2. Street location of project: RIM FIRE LANLr
3a. Present use of site: EkISTING-RESIDENTIAL LOT- FOtNDATION EXISTING
3b. Previous use of site or structures: NONE
4. ) Please list all previous cases
(if any) related to this project: '
1
5. Other related permit/approvals required. BUILDING PERMIT
Specify type and granting agency.
6. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y N
If yes, explain:
7. Project Area:
Covered by structures, paving: 7,000 sq. ft.
Landscaping, open space: 1-1/2 acres.
Total Area:
8. Number of floors: 3
9. Present zoning:
10. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used?
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that
the facts, statements "-6d infor-mAtion presented are true and
corre to he best of y kno e e ander f.
Da a ignature
For: AND MRS. JEFF JAN
B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
1. Environmental Setting --Project Site
a. Existing use/structures
b. Topography/ slopes 1-1/2.1 Slnpgaq
*C. Vegetation WEEDS
*d.. Animals RABBITS.-SOUIRRELS
*e. Watercourses NONE
f. 0iftural/historical resources NONE
9. Other
2. Environmental Setting -- Surrounding Area
a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): NONE:
b. Topogr aphy/ s lope s 1 -1/2:1 -slopes.
*C. Vegetation WEEDS
*d. Animals
RABBITS, SQUIRRELS
*e. Watercourses NONE
f ()iltural/historical resources
NONE
9- Other
Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural,
undeveloped land.
3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees?
NO
YES A
If yes, type and number: TO BE LEFT UNDISTURBED.
4. Will any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns, etc.. be changed
through project development?:
YES NO
If yes, ex ain:
5. Grading:
Will the project require grading?, YES (✓
:NO�
If yes. how many cubic yards?
Will it
be balanced on site?
YES
NO
If
not balanced, where
will dirt
be obtained or depositeid?
6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on
the property (including uncompacted fill)?
YES NO,
If yes, explain-.
7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with
moderately dense vegetation)?
YES NO J
Distance to nearest fire station:
8. Noise:
Existing noise sources at site:
Noise to be generated by project:
Fumes:
Odors generated by project:
Could toxic fumes be generated?
10. Water and sewer service:
Domestic Public
Water Sewers
Does service exist at site?CYN Y N
,
If yes. do purveyors have
capacity to meet demand of
project and all other approved
projects? oN Y N
If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services
beprovided?
Residential Projects:
11. Number and type of units:
12. Schools:
What school district(s) serves the property? 1,A)ALAU07—
Are e�1-S .
'ngschoolfacilities adequate to meet project needs?
�67
If not, what provisions will be made for additional
classrooms?
Non=Resi retial projects:
h
13. TD'stance to nearest residential use or sensitive use'(school, hospital,
e C.)
14. umber-atid floor area of buildings:
15. Number of employees and (shifts: N
16. Maximum employees per shift:
17 Operating hours:
I Identify any: End products
Waste products
Means of disposal
19. Do project opeations use, store or produce hazardous-substances such as
oil, pectic' es,lshemicals, paints, or radioactive materials?
YFS NO
If yes, explain
20. Do your opetattons require any pressurized tanks?
YES NO�
If yes, explain
21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-
site. N/A
22. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach
the nearest highway?
YES NO J
If yes, exp fi
I
f
L—v
"-M Kim'IV(LL%IONOO
oul'K w'1
Fm --1
o, - LI ■1�1
oil
—10.1 S 'l
I
'i
.- y
I
»M al,+.raa
LI{ V:) J'VNOW(4
'�"'1n]'wr�C
NV'Id 3dV;1SONVI
rIU1 rl'�I�X
MIOA1fASdM 'S 101[
au1'i -u q>t NILi
r aua w.w flat
S3SIbdH3.IN3 ININY{VY31d
uca t»u Yf wi
'IVI I,I.d30NO,l
M�r+w�.ama«aa r+»u
r�wn•a—nowu
nn a
a•� �IxaN f L f -aa IV 9 ' IV
Fm --1
o, - LI ■1�1
oil
—10.1 S 'l
I
'i
.- y
I
r
Agenda Item 2 — VAR 94-2
Plans found in project file.
-10" vbssq-,
J
juj"R
eb
FiieV,,5
on nd is"rely for
Wring
Filer _v w d by
c� 5" and is ready for
destruction by City Clerk