Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/28/199214141411 J Next Resolution No. 92-18 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AUDITORIUM 21865 E. COPLEY DRIVE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 September 28, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Flamenbaum, vice Chairman MacBride, Grothe, Li and Meyer MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Planning Commission Policy. No. 92-1 'interpreting the locational requirements of swimming pools and spas. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Planned Sign Program No. 92-01 A request to develop a Planned Sign Program for a commercial shopping center and the approval of three additional wall signs and a canopy sign. - Location: Sunset Village, 1241 S. Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar, Applicant: Brilliant Signs Inc., 1648 N. O'Donnell Way, Orange Property Owner: A & J Properties c/o D.W.A. Smith & Co., 1300 Quail St. #106, Newport Beach, CA 92660 3. 4. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-528 (1) and Development Review No. 92-03 continued from July 13, 1992 A request for approval to amend an existing CUP. The applicant is requesting to construct a new. Burger King Restaurant with drive-thru facilities. The building will be approximately 3,600 square feet, and the site is approximately 53,289 squarefeet in size. A sign plan will also be reviewed as a part of this application. Property Address: 525 S. Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar Applicant: Russel Hand, Tedrus Properties Environmental Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration Conditional Use Permit 92-5/DevelopmentReview 92-02 A request for approval to demolish the existing Arco gasoline service station and to construct a new 2,700 square feet, 24 hour AM/PM mini -mart. The proposed convenience store use will provide the sale . of gasoline and miscellaneous products including the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The .89 acre site is in the Commercial Planned Development Zone (CPD). The Development Review application is required for all new commercial construction to determine architectural computability. Property Location: 3302 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. Applicant: Gary Simning 25051 Grissom Rd. Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Property Owner: Atlantic Richfield 17315 Studebaker Rd. Cerritos, CA, Environmental Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration 5. Development Review No. 92-04 A request for a tenant improvement with exterior remodel for Alpha Beta and Shop Bldg. 4 at Country Hills Towne Center at 2825 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. Applicant: Food -4 -Less 777 S. Harbor Blvd., La Habra, CA 90631 Environmental Determination: Categorically exempt S 5061(b)(3) 6. Zoning Code Amendment No. 92-02 (Hillside Management Ordinance): Continued from September 14, 1992. A City initiated request to adopt Hillside Management Standards. 7. Zoning Code Amendment No. 92-03 (Commercial Manufacturing Zone Amendments): Continued from September 14, 1992 A City initiated request to amend certain provisions of Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted by the City of Diamond Bar, pertaining to the CM (Commercial Manufacturing) Zone (Section 22.28.230 et.al.) INFORMATION: Verbal staff report on the status of Fence/wall Policy ANNOUNCEMENTS: Staff Planning Commissioners ADJOURNMENT: October 12, 1992 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners FROM: Ann J. Lungu, Planning Technician A-�j SUBJECT: Planning Commission Policy No. 92-1 interpreting the locational requirements of swimming pools and spas installed below ground. DATE: September 21, 1992 As per the Planning Commission request, attached to this memoran- dum is Policy No. 92-1 which deals with the distance between a main structure and a pool/spa. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Planning Commission Policy No. 92-1. Policy No. 92-1 A POLICY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTERPRETING THE LOCATIONAL REQUIRE- MENTS OF SWIMMING POOLS AND SPA. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar hereby establishes the following policy in regard to the interpretation of the Los Angeles County code as adopted by the City of - Diamond Bar as the same addresses the location of swimming pools and spas installed below ground. (i) Section 22.08.010. A. of the Los Angeles County Planning and Zoning Code defines "Accessory building or structure" as "detached subordinate building or structure, the use of- which is customarily incidental to that of the main building or to the main use of the land, and which is located in the same or a less restrictive zone, and on the same lot or parcel of land with the main building or use." (ii) Section 22.08.190. B. of the Los Angeles County Code defines "Buildings" as *"any structure having a roof supported by columns or by walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of persons, animals, chattels or property.of any kind." (iii) Section 22.08.190. S. of the Los Angeles County Planning and Zoning Code defines "Structures" as "anything constructed or erected which requires a fixed location on the ground." (iv) Section 22.48.130. A.2. describes the distance between accessory and main buildings and states as follow: "Except where a greater distance is otherwise required by this Title 22, a minimum distance of six (6) feet shall be required between any main residential building and an accessory building established on the same lot or parcel of land." The framework of definitions within the Los Angeles County Planning and Zoning Code causes swimming pools to be defined as structures rather than buildings. The Code does not present any limitation on separation between a swimming pool and a main structure. Any such specific setbacks between structures shall be maintained by this policy, however, the Commission hereby determines that the Code does not specify nor prescribe any minimum or maximum distance between swimming pools and/or spas installed below ground and main buildings. (v) In light of the foregoing, the Planning commission of the City of Diamond Bar hereby -adopts the following policy in regard to the interpretation of Section 22.48.130. A.2. of the Los Angeles County Code as adopted by the City of Diamond Bar: A swimming pool and/or spa installed below ground may be constructed, subject to proper engineering specifications as determined by the City Building and Safety Division, at any distance between main structure and the water line of the pool and/or spa. A swimming pool and/or spa shall be subject to other development standards within the Los Angeles Planning and Zoning Code. (vi) The Planning Department of the City of Diamond Bar is hereby directed to interpret the Los angeles County Code, as such may regard the location of swimming pools and/or spas installed below ground, in conformance with the foregoing policy. Date of Adoption: Attest: James DeStefano, Secretary Bruce Flamenbaum, Chairman TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Chairman and Planning Commissioners Ann J. Lungu, Planning Technician Planned Sign Program No. 92-1 September 21, 1992 The hearing held on September 14, 1992 for Planned Sign Program No. 92-1, located in the Sunset Village Shopping Center at 1241 S. Grand Avenue was continued until September 28, 1992 due to the suspension of the General Plan. The hearing for this project will be held on October 12, 1992, due to the fact that several issues need to be resolved. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: PROPERTY LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: BACKGROUND: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report 3 September 22, 1992. September 28, 1992 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 89528 and Development Review 92-03 The applicant is requesting an amendment to the CUP and Development Review to allow the development of a Burger King restaurant with drive through facilities. 525 S. Grand Ave. Russell E. Hand P.O. Box 4655 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Tedrus Properties 525 S. Grand Ave. Diamond Bar, CA 911765 The public.hearing for this application was held on July 13, 1992 by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission opened the public hearing, received testimony, reviewed the project and directed the staff and applicant to address some very specific issues. The Planning Commission also took action to approve an Extension of Time request. The grant gives the applicant one additional year to exercise the CUP. The project is located in Zone C -3 -DP -BE and in a Commercial land use designation as stipulated in the General Plan. APPLICATION ANALYSIS: The applicant has submitted a revised site plan that responds to the concerns raised by the staff in response to the previous design. The revisions to the site plan include improved pedestrian access, internal traffic circulation, parking provisions, and modifications to the trash enclosures. Pedestrian Access The applicant has provided additional access from the Honda Dealership on the pad to the north, via pedestrian stairs and an additional sidewalk which leads to the restaurant's main entrance. This sidewalk is located between the drive-thru access and the northern most parking area. The site plan also has incorporated a tie-in to the existing sidewalk systems located off-site in, the public right-of-way. Additionally, sidewalks have been placed on the southeast perimeter of the parking area concrete pavers have been incorporated as pedestrian crosswalks. Parking/Circulation The vehicular provisions have been revised to include -parking stalls of 9' x 190, no compact stalls, and four RV stalls (10'.x 201) for a total of 51 stalls. This exceeds the minimum standards required per code. The location of the handicapped stalls has been revised to the main entrance at the front of the restaurant and abut each other. The stalls had been situated at either side of the building and at a greater distance from the entrance. Ingress and egress to the site has been improved by altering the previously proposed throat design to utilize an "alley approach". The alley approach provides an increase in the turning radius which will allow for turns at higher speeds from Grand Ave. and Brea Canyon Road. The approach from Grand Ave. entrance has been increased to a width of 30 ft. as it feeds into the central portion of the site and to the drive-thru lane. The drive aisles have been revised to meet the fire department's 26 ft. width requirement. The drive-thru lane is 15 ft. at the entrance and narrows to a consistent 12 ft. throughout the remaining length. The throat has been lengthened at the terminus of the drive-thru lane and a stop sign will be positioned at the point of egress to the parking area and the access to Brea Canyon Road. The result of these design alterations will be to reduce the potential for traffic accidents and to increase the safety factor for pedestrian traffic. Trash Enclosure The trash enclosure has received attention directed at providing the least restrictive access for restaurant employees and for trash haulers. The applicant has accomplished this not by relocation but by the design of the perimeter area. For example, the enclosure now directs the restaurant employees into the structure via a sidewalk that enters through offset walls from the west. The only access to remove the trash receptacles will be from the south side and the doors will open to the public parking area. The perimeter of the enclosure has been revised to include a 3 1/2 ft. landscaped median to the east and a 3 ft. stripped area, to the south. This will aid in maintaining unobstructed access. Additionally, the stripped area to the south also helps to ensure that the transformer situated adjacent to the enclosure will be accessible from all sides. The enclosure will be 6 ft. in height and stuccoed to match the restaurant. Staff recommends that the gate to the enclosure be constructed of a wood material that compliments the exterior materials of the main structure. signage The signage for the proposed project is less than the signage approved for the McDonalds restaurant although there are components within the proposed sign plan that exceed current standards. The proposed monument sign at the Grand Ave. located to the south of the entrance is consistent with the previously approved 100 sq. ft. sign. Current standards allow for a maximum of 72 sq. ft. The wall signs proposed are fewer in number than those approved for the McDonalds restaurant. The directional signs (3) for the project are 4.5 sq. ft. in size and are proposed for the Brea Canyon Road entrance and at the entrance and exit to'the drive-thru. The wall signs proposed are at three locations. The southern elevation proposes a 71 X 141 (98 sq. ft.) wall sign on the parapet at roof level, and the east and west elevations propose one 51 X 51 (25 sq. ft.) sign centrally located on the tower. Three flag poles are again proposed at the Grand Ave. entrance.and are consistent with the previous approval (2@ 25 ft, 1@ 30 ft. in height). The freeway oriented sign is being revised to delete the car wash use and to remove the shingled roof from the sign top. As a result of the absence of the car wash the remaining uses will share 336 sq. ft (121 X 281) of signage per side. The revised sign represents a reduction of approximately 140 sq. ft. of sign area in relation to the existing entitlement. The removal of the "roof" from the sign will give the sign a less massive look. The height of the sign will remain unchanged as will its location on lot No. 4. conclusion The project has been revised in response to the Planning Commission and to staff concerns. The parking and internal circulation issues have been revised to reflect the current development standards and special areas of concern. Additionally, pedestrian access and the trash recepticles have been adequately addressed. The circulation plan throughout the site has *been improved. Attention to parking, drive aisles, and turning movements have been attended to with sensitivity to the site's constraints and unusual configuration. The trash enclosure has been redesigned to allow for greater access by both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. There have also been features added to reduce the unobtrusiveness to the greatest extent possible at this location. The sign program for the project proposes a major reduction in the intensity of the signs. The quantity of signs proposed for this project are fewer in number than the previous restaurant and the total square footage of signage has also been reduced. The reduction in the massiveness and sign area of the freeway oriented sign is indicative of the trend by the applicant to reduce the intensity of the signage for the site. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: As a result of the review of the initial study, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: This application was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on July 13, 1992 and all property owners (3) within a 500 radius were mailed notices of the public hearing. This is a continued public hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends' that the Planning Commission aapprove the proposed amendments to CUP 89-528, DR 92-03 with the Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the attached resolutions. PREPARED BY: Robert Searcy, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: Revised Site Plan Planning Commission Staff Report of 7/13/92 Draft Resolutions of Approval MW51WORKABORKING.STY September 28, 1992 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DR 92-3 1. This permit shall not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized representative of the owner of the property involved has filed, at the office of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, 'his affidavit stating that the applicant is aware of, and accepts all the conditions of this permit; . 2. That all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the un- derlying zoning of the subject property must be complied with, unless set forth in the permit and shown on the approved plans and a Development Program must be submitted to the Community Development Director before this permit can be exercised; 3. That three copies of the revised plot plan marked Exhibit "All and conforming to such of the following conditions as can shown on a plan, shall be submitted for approval of the Community Development Director. The property shall thereafter be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans. 4. That the applicant must, comply with all State, Zone C -3 -DP -BE, Engineering Department, and Building and Safety Department requirements. 5. This grant is valid for one year and must - be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period 'or this grant will expire. A one year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to the expiration date. 6. That all grading, drainage plans and wall plans shall conform to all City standards or as amended by this action. 7. All construction materials must comply with materials board approved by the Planning commission and marked as Exhibit "A-11'. 8. The project must be developed in compliance with the landscape plan submitted and -approved by the Planning commission. 9. Notwithstanding any previous Subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of Fish and Game requires payment of a fee pursuant to Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement. EKDR92-03.CON RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 92-3 AN APPLICATION FOR A BURGER KING RESTAURANT LOCATED 525 S. GRAND AVE. ON PARCEL NO.2 OF PARCEL MAP 15625, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. _Recitals. (i) Russell E. Hand, P.O. Box 4655, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 has heretofore filed an application as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the project, located at address indicated in the -title of this Resolution, shall be referred to as "the application". (ii) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of the California Government Code Section 57376, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its ordinance No. 14, thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, in- cluding the subject application, within the City of Diamond Bar. (iii) The City of Diamond Bar has approved a General Plan. Accordingly, action was taken on the subject application as to the consistency with the General Plan, and has been deemed consistent. (iv) on July* 13, 1992 the Planning commission of the City, of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, continued to and concluded said public hearing on September 28, 1992. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Community Development Director hereby specifi- cally finds.that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically -finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forthbelow, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. 4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above -referenced public hearing opened on July 13, 1992, continued to and concluded on September 28, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and in conformance with the terms and provisions of California Government Code Sections 65360, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1. The subject property is located at 525 S. Grand Ave., parcel No. 2 of Parcel Map 15625 in the City of Diamond Bar and is located adjacent to Diamond Bar Honda. 2. The property is located in Zone C -3 -DP -BE and allows this use by Conditional Use Permit. The site is approximately 1.21 acres in size and has been graded. 3. The applicant's request is for the construction of a Burger King restaurant approximately 4,292 sq. ft. in size. 4. The property to the north is currently developed with Diamond Bar Honda Auto dealership, and the sites to south, east, and west are currently vacant. The site can be accessed via Grand Ave. and Brea Canyon Rd. 5. The subject site lies within the Diamond Bar General Plan commercial designation. The current zoning of the site is in compliance with the land use designation. 6. There were no protests to the use prior to the public hearing. 7. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made. 8. The design and layout of the proposed devel- opment is consistent with the applicable ele- ments of the City's General Plan, design guidelines and architectural criteria of the appropriate district; The design and layout of the proposed devel- opment will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the neighboring ex- isting and future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrians hazards; The architectural design of the proposed restaurant is compatible with the character of the surrounding current and proposed development and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and at ' tractive development contemplated by this Chapter and the general plan of the City;. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occu- pants and visiting public as well as its nei- ghbors through good aesthetic use of materi- als, texture and color that will remain aes- thetically appealing and will retain a rea- sonably adequate level of. maintenance. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or mate- rially injurious to the properties or impro- vements in the vicinity. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following restrictions as to use: 1. This permit shall not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized represent- ative of the owner of the property involved has 'filed, at the office, of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, his affidavit stating that the applicant is aware of, and accepts all the conditions of this permit; 2. That all requirements of the Zoning ordinance and of the underlying zoning of the subject property must be complied with, unless set forth in the permit and shown on the approved plans and a Development Program must be submitted to the Communi ty Development Director before this permit can be exercised; 3 3. That three copies of the. revised plot plan marked Exhibit "All and conforming to such of the following conditions as can shown on a plan, shall be submitted for approval of the Community Development Director. The property shall thereafter be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans. 4. That the applicant must, comply with all State, Zone C -3 -DP -BE, Engineering Department, and Building and Safety Department requirements. 5. This grant is valid for one year and must be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period or this grant will expire. A one year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to the expiration date. 6. That all grading, drainage plans and wall plans shall conform to all City standards or as amended by this action. 7. All construction materials must comply with materials board approved by the Planning Commission and marked as Exhibit IIA -1 8. The project must be developed in compliance with the landscape plan submitted and appro- ved by the Planning Commission. 9. Notwithstanding any previous Subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of Fish and Game requires payment of a fee pursuant to Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the appli- cant prior to the issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement. The Planning Commission Secretary shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Reso- lution, to Russell Hand at the address as set forth on the application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Bruce Flamenbaum, Planning Commission chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission Public Hearing opened on July 13, 1992 and continued to 28th day of September, 1992. ROB\BKDR92-03.RES t, City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4 REPORT DATE: July 9, 1992 MEETING DATE: July 13, 1992 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit 89528 and Conditional Use Permit 89528 (1) and Development Review 92-03 APPLICATION REQUEST: (1) For a one (1) year extension of time for the existing CUP for the expansion of the existing Honda Dealership, construction of a car wash and a McDonald's restaurant. (2) Additionally, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the CUP and Development Review to allow -the development of a Burger King restaurant with drive through facilities. PROPERTY LOCATION: 525 S. Grand Ave. APPLICANT: Russell E. Hand P.O. Box 4655 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Tedrus Properties 525 S. Grand Ave. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 BACKGROUND: The development proposal was submitted to the County of Los Angeles in 1989, was subsequently processed by the City, and received approval by the Planning commission on May 14, 1990 and was appealed to and approved by the City Council on July 10, 1990. The applicant requested a one (1) year Extension of Time which was granted by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1991. To this date, no structures or project components, with the exception of a retaining wall along the freeway, have been initiated or completed on-site although rough grading has been initiated. The graded site is of a retaining wall along the freeway, have been initiated. or completed on-site although rough grading has been initiated. The graded site is currently used for storage and display of vehicles from the dealership. The project is as follows: Parcel No. I Diamond Bar Honda Dealership Approved for a 4,375 sq. ft. expansion of the existing dealership to be used for retail, storage and service space, and a 3 1/2 floor parking structure with a wall sign. Parcel No. 2 McDonald's Restaurant Approved for a 5,000 sq. ft. fast food restaurant with drive thru window and a maximum occupancy of 116. Parcel No. 3 Automated Car Wash Approved for a 4,850 sq. ft. structure containing an automated car wash and gasoline dispensing facilities. The use will display two service islands and a maximum of six gas dispensers. Parcel No. 4 Freestanding Freeway Sign The freestanding freeway oriented sign will be located on the parcel. The 'maximum height is 25 ft. above the adjacent Grand Avenue street elevation. No development project is approved for this site. Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code as adopted by the City of Diamond Bar, allows for a CUP to be conditioned so as to limit the life of an unused grant for a maximum of three (3) years, which can be requested in increments not to exceed one (1) year in duration. The applicant is currently requesting the final Extension of Time allowed by the code in order that the project might proceed. The applicant is proposing to replace the approved McDonalds restaurant on lot No. 2 with a Burger King restaurant. This request requires an amendment to the existing CUP. The grant which is due to expire, is very explicit in that the type of use (restaurant) and a specific user (McDonalds) were called out within the entitlement (site 'plan, resolution, and conditions, etc.). The alteration of this grant requires an amendment to the CUP for the change in user and Development Review for the revised elevations, signage, and circulation plan proposed. APPLICATION ANALYSIS: The application before the Planning Commission contains two main issues. First however, the Planning Commission must follow, through on one of three courses of action. The Commission may: 1) grant the Extension of Time as requested by the applicant or for some other period of time up to one year and grant the Development Review and amendment to the CUP application; 2) grant the Extension of Time but deny. the Development Review and the amendment to the CUP or request 0A1 revised plans; 3) deny the Extension of Time, Development Review, and CUP applications. The Planning Commission should consider the following in drawing their conclusions considering the proposed project and the previously pproved two ansince approved land uses. The project was a and criterion haveyears evolvedago concd erning that time development standards issues such as parking stall dimensions and signage to name a few. Extension of Time The applicant is requesting a second one order that the project can proceed z brightens- The applicant states that tI" $200,000 in improvements by the owner sine Additionally, the rough grading ofthe s the Commission has granted the previously (1) year time extension in s the economic atmosphere a project has received over s the property was purchased. to has been completed since requested time extension. commercial financing The applicant states that co is difficult to obtain is not currently under at the present time. Although the projectis still and his viable construction, the applicant states that the development licant and that the requested extension will allow the app associates the necessary time to move forward with the development. The Extension of Time would allow the project to proceed as approved by the City Council in July 1990. Amendmentto Cup 89528(1)/Development Review 92-03 The CUP granted in 1990 by the City Council for the construction of a McDonalds fast food restaurant was very explicit in the phrasing of the ifically for that user at that location and grant. The grant was spec lication for an amendment to the CUP. The any revision required an app intent of council was to guarantee that public review and input on the design and aestheticsof any revised project would be placed before the public. The Burger King restaurant is proposed for a site approximately 1.21 acres in size .. and is designed with approximately 30 percent landscaping. Access to the site is taken f rom Grand Avenue on the eastern portion of the site and from Brea Canyon Road on the west. The parcel slopes approximately 3 percent from the east to the west and has been rough graded. The site is devoid of vegetation at present. be 4,292 s. ft. ania rimarilone The building is proposed to story building with minimal (approxmately 700 sq. d ft.s ) storage area in the second floor. No seating is proposed in the limited second floor serve primarily as an exterior architectural feature. The which will plans also indicate a playground/ recreation. area. No seating is indicated and no formal plans have been submitted to identify the components of the play area. The restaurant is 281611 in height from grade to the top of the tower. The main portion of the structure is 171611 above grade. The project is designed typical of other Burger King restaurants with a Santa Barbara eggshell plaster and San Simeon plaster base trim on the moldings. Additional trim includes a Vermillion ceramic tile and metal flashing painted to match adjacent finish. The roof material features a Bermuda Blend red clay brick --and will extend to all hips and ridges. The building is designed with a drive-thru facility with the access road beginning at the east elevation and food pick up on the west elevation. The structure is designed with public entrances at the south and east elevations. An employee entrance is located on the north elevation for access to the to trash enclosure. Parking Area/Internal circulation The project proposes 53 parking spaces. There are two recreational vehicle and two handicap parking stalls and 7.5 percent of the stalls are for compact parking. The Planning Commission'in the past has established a policy of requiring 91X191 standard parking stalls and as a matter of course, this would require the redesign of. the parking plan. All driveway aisles are 26 ft in width as required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department except at the Grand Avenue entrance. The driveway will need to be redesigned to comply with the 26 ft on either side of the landscape median or to remove the median. Additionally, the Grand Avenue entrance will need to be designed with an alley drive approach for increasing ease of access. This approach will o ' pen the entrance to allow less restrictive and dramatic turning movements into and out of the site. The Engineering Department staff also identified a potential problem at the exit of the approximately 400 ft. long drive-thru. The proximity of this opening to the Brea Canyon Road driveway is a potential source of vehicular safety problems because of the traffic volume expected at this location. Although this location is on a cul-de-sac, this driveway accesses the only controlled intersection serving the restaurant and adjacent car wash site. There are additional concerns because of potential visual impediments for drive-thru patrons * as they attempt to negotiate turns from west bound cars exiting the parcel. Review of the trash enclosure location indicates that there are concerns as to the most appropriate location from an aesthetic and internal circulation standpoint. The proposed location is not the most appealing location from an aesthetic stand point although it is convenient from a functional perspective. The trash removal at this. location does however create a great potential for disruption of internal circulation if it is conducted during regular business hours. signage The project proposes signage that is consistent with the signage approved for the McDonalds restaurant. The issue at hand for the 4 commission to decide is whether the current standards as established by the City's sign code are applicable. Under the current sign ordinance, signage for this property would be substantially reduced. The freeway oriented sign for the center would not be allowed at the 'current height nor would the 10'X10' entry sign from Grand Avenue to parcel No. 2 be permissible. The wall signs proposed for this project are far, less than those approved for the McDonalds restaurant and would comply with the current code. The remaining proposed signage is also in substantial compliance with the current sign ordinance. Conclusion The Commission, in considering these applications, should take into consideration the appropriateness of the land uses approved for I the site as well as the development standards applied to the project. Balanced with these considerations, the commission must recognize that their body, in the past, has weighed these issues and granted the Extension of Time request. The denial of the requested time extension would preclude taking action on the amendment to the CUP and the Development Review application. Staff has reviewed the Burger King development application and has found that there are design problems that must addres ' sed. The fast food restaurant land use proposed by the project is an acceptable one at this location and would not create an incompatible use to the existing or 'proposed projects. The Hohda dealership and the car wash are not proposing any changes as a part of this action. The hurdle that must be surmounted by the Commission is 'to determine the appropriateness of the project in whole and in part. Additionally, the Commission will have to decide the degree that to which the project can move forward with the entitlements granted under standards applicable two years ago. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Negative Declaration as prepared for Conditional Use Permit 89528 (1990). PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: This application was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on June 22, 1992 and all property owners (3) within a 500 radius were mailed notices of the public hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following course of action: 1. Approve the Extension of Time application for the requested one 5 (1) year period. 2. Direct the applicant to work with staff in redesigning the Burger King restaurant to improve the internal circulation and parking situation and bring the project back to the Planning Commission at the appropriate time for the CUP and the Development Review. Robert Searcy, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: Application Letter Requesting the Extension of TIme Initial Study Burger King Development Plans City Council Resolution 90-67 and Conditions of Approval Minutes of May 14,; 1990 Planning Commission HONDA/BRORKING.STY R Agenda Item 3. — CUP89-528/DR92-03 (Burger King Plans found in project file. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: September 24, 1992 TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners FROM: Robert Searcy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 92-5/Development Review 92- 02 The public hearing for this project was continued to September 28, 1992 from the Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 1992. The continuance was necessitated by the suspension of the General Plan. The hearing for this project will be held on October 12, 1992, due to the prior scheduling of preceeding public hearings. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE:. CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: BACKGROUND: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report ki September 2, 1992 September 28, 1992 Development Review No. 92-4 A request for a complete exterior remodel of Alpha Beta and shops facing Diamond Bar Blvd. and a partial remodeling of Shop Building #4 facing Cold Springs Lane. Country Hills Towne Center 2825 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. Food -4 -Less 777 S. Harbor Blvd. La Habra, CA 90631 Landsing Pacific Fund 155 Bovet Rd. Ste. 101 San Mateo, CA 94402 The applicant, Food -4 -Less and Landsing Pacific Fund, is requesting Development Review (DR) approval to remodel the exterior of Alpha Beta and Shop Building #4 located in the Country Hills Towne Center. At the time of this staff report, the applicant is doing an interior remodel of Alpha Beta. The shopping center had a partial remodel in April, 1988. This partial remodel incorporated the Krikorian Theater and shops between it and Alpha Beta. The site of the proposed project is located in a Restricted Business (C-1) zone and has a General Plan designation of General Commercial (C) . Generally, the following uses surround the site: to the North is Single Family Residential (R-1-7,500) zone; to the South is Residential Planned Development (RPD -1-15U) zone; to the East is R-1-20,000 zone; West is R- 1-7,500 which is separated from the subject site by a flood control channel. AGENDA ITEM September 28, 1992 Page 2 APPLICATION ANALYSIS: The subject site, Country Hills Towne Center, is approximately 17.7 acres and is located along Diamond Bar Blvd. between Fountain springs Road and Cold Spring Lane. The applicant, at this time, is planning two phases of exterior remodeling. A complete exterior remodel is proposed for Alpha I Beta and the shops located at the south side of Alpha Beta. The exterior of the shops facing Cold Springs Lane is to be updated by new cement plaster on the sign band and existing columns, brick paver accent on the columns, and the installation of light sconces. The applicant would like to complete exterior remodel of these shops at a later date. Staff does not recommend phasing of the exterior remodeling and would prefer it to be done at one time. All existing structures involved in the proposed remodel are one story and will remain as such. Additional square footage is not proposed with the exterior remodel. The architectural style for the proposed remodeling is Mediterranean which conforms with the existing architectural style of Country Hills Towne Center. . A "tower" is proposed at the corner where the shops facing Lane intersect with the shops at the south side of Alpha tower will match the existing towers intervals throughout the shopping cent each side of the tower. The awnings wi "Rodeo" as provided on the materials b the structures. If awnings are to be a will need to be added to all the other center. which are placed Cold Springs Beta. The at various er. Awnings are to be 11 be a light sand color oard) to match the sign d ded to this tower, then towers throughout the added on (#5213M band on awnings shopping The roof of Alpha Beta and the shops located at the south side of Alpha Beta will be constructed of tile fabricated from clay, one piece mission "IS" and of a color called El Camino. This will match the previous remodel. The roof of the shops facing Cold Springs Lane will remain as they exist. The exterior of Alpha Beta and all shops will be cement plastered, medium dash coat finish of a color call La Habra #48 (off-white stucco) . The pilasters will have the same finish as the exterior of the shopping center structures with brick accent to match the existing accent on the pilasters of the remainder of the shopping center. Dark bronze, anodized metal, wall sconces will be added to each pilaster to provide AGENDA ITEM .September 28, 1992 Page 3 light and will match existing sconces throughout the remainder of the shopping center. Pyramid shaped plaster accents (off-white in color) will be added to the sign band at each side of the Alpha Beta sign. Alpha Beta is proposing a change in the location of the entrance/exit doors. The main entrance/exit located at the center of their unit will be replaced with windows. The entrance exit at the south side of their unit will remain and a new entrance/exit will be installed at the north side of their unit. Both entrance/exit doors will face the parking area. At the Alpha Beta entrance area, a new concrete walkway and a new handicap ramp will be installed, along with the proper striping, to accommodate the new location of the front entrance/exit. The new walkway will be standard grey in color with pavers for accent to match the brick trim on the pilasters. The new walkway will have a light broom concrete finish. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: This item has been advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Tribune on August 31, 1992 and in the Highlander on September 2, 1992. Notices were mailed to approximately 168 property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site on September 1, 1992. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental evaluation indicate that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061.B.3. of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 92-4, with the following Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the attached resolution. Attachments: Application Resolution 92 -XX Exhibit "All - Elevations Aerial A. B. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 92-4 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AN APPLICATION FOR A TENANT IMPROVEMENT WITH EXTERIOR REMODELING FOR ALPHA BETA LOCATED AT 2825 S. DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BETWEEN FOUNTAIN SPRINGS ROAD AND COLD SPRINGS LANE. Recitals 1. Food -4 -Less and Landsing Pacific Fund has filed an application for Development Review No. 92-4 and located at 2825 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, California, as described in the title of this Resolution. Herein- after in this Resolution, the subject Development Review application is referred to as "Application". 2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal organization of the State of -California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of the California Government Code Section 57376, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 1, thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, including the subject Application, within the City of Diamond Bar. 3. This Commission hereby finds that the proposed project described in this Resolution conforms to the General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar. 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, on September 28, 1992 conducted a duly noticed public hear- ing on said Application. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolu- tion have occurred. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. E1 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the Director that the project as proposed by the Application, and conditioned for approval herein, will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence presented in the record before the Director, the Director hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the Applicant shall pay all fees required for the filing of a Notice of Determination and any other fees imposed by the California Department of Fish and Game prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. Based upon substantialevidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above public hearing and oral testimony provide at the hearing, the Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The project relates to a site of approximately 17.7 acres called Country Hills Towne Center which is comprised of retail shops, restaurants, and a cinema within the C-1 zone with General Plan designation of General Commercial (C), on the north side of Diamond Bar Blvd., between Fountain Springs Lane and Cold Springs Lane, City of. Diamond Bar, California. (b) Generally, property to the north is Single -Family Residential (R-1-7,500) zone; property to the south is Residential Planned Development (RPD -1- 15U) zone; property to the East is R-1-20,000 zone; and property to the West is R-1-7,500 zone which is separated from the subject site by a flood control channel. (c) The subject site for the project is adequately served by Diamond Bar Blvd., Fountain Springs Road, and Cold Springs Lane. KI (d) The nature, condition, and size of the site has been considered. The site is adequate in size to accommodate the use. (e) This project is in compliance with the General Plan. (f) This project is in compliance with the Development Review ordinance No.5 (1990). (g) Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made.' (h) Approval of this project will not have an adverse impact on adjacent or adjoining residential or 'commercial uses. It will note be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment, or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity and will not adversely affect the health or welfare of persons residing in the surrounding ,area. (i) The architectural design of the Development Review is compatible with the existing character of the Country Hills Towne Center and the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by the Development Review ordinance and the General Plan and will provide a desirable environment for its occupant, visiting public, and neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. (j) Notwithstanding any previous subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of Fish and Game require payment of a fee pursuant to section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement. (k) The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth above, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. (1) The Planning commission finds that facts supporting the above specified findings are contained in the staff report and exhibits, and the information provided to this Commission during 3 the public hearing conducted with respect to the project will be made a condition of approval of said project and are intended to mitigate and/or avoid environmental effects identified in this project. 5. Based upon the substantial evidence and conclusion set forth herein above in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and conditions set forth below in this Resolution, presented to the Planning Commission on September 28, 1992, public hearing as set forth above, the Commission, hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a)- The project shall substantially conform to all plans dated September 28, 1992 as submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission labeled Exhibit "A". (b) The Applicant shall complete, without phasing, the exterior remodel of Alpha Beta, the shops located at the south side of Alpha Beta facing Diamond Bar Blvd., and the shops facing Cold Springs Lane. (c) The Applicant shall add awnings to all existing towers to match the proposed tower with awnings. (d) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant and pay remaining Planning Division processing fees. (e) It is hereby declared that and made a condition of this permit that if any condition hereof is violated, or if any law, statue, or ordinance is violated, the permit shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. (f) This approval is valid for one year. if an extension is needed, a request, submitted in writing, to the Planning Commission shall be required before the expiration date of this approval. 4 The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified co py of this by certified mail, to Food -4 -Less and L nds ng Resolution, fic Fund at the address as set forth on the application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: James DeStefano I, James Destefano, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September, 1992. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR case# bgRecvd DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 21660 E. Copley Drive suite 190 Fee $ 12p06. 015 -stj (714)396-5676 Fax (714)860-3117 Receipt RR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION By Record Owner ((s/) Applicant Applicant's Agent Name Lig A/A/-),r/, AWX )A tyll,lf W /4 P/0AL& (Last *haiiefirst) Address.,.,., 'POO CaS 7ALce4- Zip Phone (Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations) comsEwn r consent to the submission of the application accompanying this request Signed ..Date 7/9 ttw 94:57 C(ALL !recorded owners) Cert" �catlon: 1, the undersigned, - hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Printed Name:)wml �A t Y (Apolicant-or Agent) Signed Date — (Applicant or Agent) Location (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning HNM 10, a.,1-4 3 � --S Previous Cases Present Use of Site Use applied for LEGAL DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lots)/parcel(s) Area devoted to structures Landscaping/open space Proposed density (Units Acres) Style of Architecture Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof A CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (714)396-5676 Fax (714)860-3117 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION case# _k9_9a__ 6 -&1 Recvd- Fee$ a?, 0,0 -7 /..z Receipt -41zazge By. Record Owner(a) Applicant Applicant's Agent Name lA %11V1,J (Last -naiW first) Address,,,.- City's" 7'rtel ".4 A4 14V zip Phone (714 Z -22e!!z V / 7Y (Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations) CONSENT: X consent to the submission of the application accompanying this request Signed —Date (All recorded owners) Certification: X, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Printed Name: (ApoLicanfor Agent) Signed 41_'_1J11e11-41J Date gpn Applicant or A 0 Location (Str L 16 6daress or tract and Lot number) Zoning HNM prPuiCALIFS Present Use of Use applied for LEGAL DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lot (s)/parcel(s) . Area devoted to structures Landscaping/open space Proposed density I (Units Acres) Style of Architecture Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): NAME PHONE # Staff Use Project No. ----------------------------------- - Project Representative: / h ot le" 1, Action requested and project description: t / �, .. rp- r 2. Street location of project: fi17 3a. Present use of site: f 3b. Previous use of site or structures: C1} 4. Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: A 1141-'- 5. Other related permit/approvals required. Specify type and granting agency. 6. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y If yes, explain: 7. Project Area: ' "/�� ��" © 1 Covered by structures, paving: Landscaping, open space, Total Area: 8. Number of floors: 9. Present zoning: 10. Water and sewer service: Does service exist at site? If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved projects? Domestic Water 0 N CN Public lic Sewers 0 N 6 IN If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services beprovided? Residential Projects: 11. Number and type of units: 12. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs? YES NO If not, what provisions classrooms? will be made for additional Non -Residential projects: 13. Distance to nearest res-idential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, F% etc.) 14. Number and floor area of buildings: )U 15. Number of employees and shifts: 16. Maximum employees per shift: 17. Operating hours: 18. Identify any: End products Waste products Means of disposal 19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pest icides-,) chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? YES If yes, explain 20. Do your Operations require any pressurized tanks? "YES C_.% If yes, explain 21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on- site. 'Will deliver . y Or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach 22. the nearest highway? -YES If yes, explain 1. Environmental Setting --Project Site a. Eeisting use/structures b. Topography/ slopes *C. Vegetation *d. Animals 14 *e. Watercourses f. Caltural/historical resources 9. Other 2. Environmental Setting -- Surrounding Area a. Existing uses structures (types, densiti es): 7 b. Topography/slopes *C. Vegetation *d. Animals *e. Watercourses f. Caltural/historical resources 9- Other Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land. 3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak. trees? YES NO If yes, t ype and number 4. Will any natural watercourses, . surface flow patterns, etc., be changed through project development?: YES ONO, If yes, explain: 5. Grading: Will the project require grading? YES If yes, how many cubic yards? Will it be balanced on site? YES NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited? 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including uncompacted fill)? YES 1! 0 If yes, explain: 1 . ...... � I I , I 7. is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance to nearest fire station: 8. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: Noise to be generated by project: Fumes: odors generated by project: Could toxic fumes be generated? r r 10. What energy -conserving -designs or material will be used? `. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. / . A�/')ZL'-zz ate gnature 1t2 - For: Plans found in project file. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I N T E R 0 F F I C E M E M 0 R A N D U M DATE: September 24, 1992 TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 6 Materials for the Hillside Management Ordinance will be provided tomorrow. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I N T E R 0 F F I C E M E X 0 R A N D U X DATE: September 24, 1992 TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Commercial Manufacturing Zone Amendments The public hearing for the Zoning Code Amendment 92-3 (Commercial Manufacturing Zone Amendments) was continued to the September 28, 1992, Planning Commission Meeting. Due to the large number of items to be addressed at this meeting, ZCA No. 92-3 will be continued to the October 12, 1992, meeting. Nd bewtaivel 910- gninnew V.d sa) al TC4 — — Alsi0i Xji3O yd floilOulle.4c, Fill ie ad Oy . Com.. on ^ ar�d is°ready i?or renin Fil;,fie� ed by c: -2onand-is ready tor - destruction by City Clack