HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/19/1994cit'19 /
C OUYICI
AGENDA
Tuesday, July 19, 1994
6:00 P.M.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Gary H. Werner
Clair W. Harmony
Eileen R. Ansari
Phyllis E. Papen
Gary G. Miller
City Manager Terrence L. Belanger
Interim City Attorney Michael Montgomery
City Clerk Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports, or other written documentation relating to agenda items, are on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item,
please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform, the City Clerk
a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
A
-.- 40--0 i.-kj%& -
f INVII11II11,11: 1
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking
in the Council Chambers.
The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
and encourages you to do the same.
MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council meeting is the forum established to
conduct the business of the City of Diamond Bar, its
citizens, property owners, and businesses. The City
Council has chosen to conduct its business meetings in a
televised, open forum. This has been done to assure that
all community members are kept informed as to the status of
City business. It is the Council's objective to conclude
the business stated on the evening's agenda by a reasonable
hour, which is 11:00 p.m. To accomplish tonight's
objectives, the City Council requests that:
1. Public comments may be directed to Consent
Calendar items or matters of interest to the
public, which are not on this evening's agenda.
2. Public comments on scheduled matters will be
heard in conjunction with the respective
agendized subject.
3. There are to be no personal attacks toward
individual members of the City Council. Such
comments are viewed as personal attacks against
the entire City Council and will not be
tolerated.
4. There are to be no personal attacks from an
individual Council member. Such are viewed as
personal attacks from the entire City Council,
which are not conducive to a positive business
meeting environment; and, will not be tolerated.
The Diamond Bar City Council appr iates your cooperation.
Gar ��. We=ner, Mayor
C
Clair W. Harmony Phyllis E. Papen
Mayor Pro Tem Council o
Eileen R. Ansari ry G. Mill
Councilwoman Councilman
Next Resolution No. 94-35
Next Ordinance No. 03(1994)
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Werner
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Papen,
Miller, Mayor Pro Tem Harmony and
Mayor Werner
2. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 INCLUDING MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATIONS, SPECIAL FUNDS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS,
OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH - Submitted for Council
review and approval is the proposed FY 1994-95 Annual budget.
Continued from July 5, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council adopt
Resolution No. 94 -XX approving and adopting a budget for FY
94-95.
Requested by: City Manager
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, - None
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to
the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There
is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City
Council.
5. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council -
members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting.
6. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
6.1 Concert in the Park - July 20, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 p.m.,
Eddie Reed - Swing Band - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930
Golden Springs Rd.
6.2 Planning Commission - July 25, 1994 _ 7:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.3 Concert in the Park - July 27, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 p.m.,
Cody Bryant Band - Country Western/Blue Grass - Sycamore
Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Rd.
JULY 19', 1994
7.
8.
PAGE 2
6.4 COL Technical Committee - July 27, 1994- 7:00 p.m., City
Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr.
6.5 Parks & Recreation Commission - July 28 1994 - 7:00 p.m.,
Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
6.6 Multi -Cultural - August 1, 1994 - 7:00 P.M., AQMD Room
CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.7 City Council Meeting - August 2, 1994 - 7:00 p.m.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
7.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.1.1 Regular Meeting of May 23, 1994 - Receive and
File.
7.1.2 Regular Meeting of June 13, 1994 - Receive &
File.
Requested by: Community Development Director
7.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.2.1 Regular Meeting of April 14, 1994 - Receive &
File.
7.2.2 Regular Meeting of May 12, 1994 - Receive &
File.
Requested by: City Engineer
7.3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.3.1 Regular Meeting of March 24, 1994 - Receive &
File.
7.3.2 Regular Meeting of April 28, 1994 - Receive &
File.
7.3.3 Regular Meeting of May 26, 1994 - Receive &
File.
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.4 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated July
19, 1994 in the amount of $458,954.90.
Requested by: City Manager
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 89-97H: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL - All
cities are required to adopt conflict of interest codes
designating certain positions participating in making
decisions which may affect financial interests. Since
adoption of the City's Code on October 3, 1989, amend-
ments have been necessary to add new positions or delete
obsolete positions.
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive
JULY 19, 1994 PAGE 3
testimony and adopt Resolution No. 89-97H adding the
position of Community Relations Coordinator to the City's
Conflict of Interest Code.
Requested by: City Clerk
8.2 ADOPTION OF THE 1994 GENERAL PLAN - In December, 1993,
the Council repealed the former General Plan and
initiated action necessary to prepare the 1994 General
Plan. A General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) was
established and 15 public meetings were held between
January and June 1994 to craft the General Plan. On July
11, 1994, the Planning Commission began its public hear-
ing process to review GPACIs recommendations. Therefore,
the City Council Public Hearing previously scheduled for
July 19 should be continued.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the July 19th
City Council Public Hearing be continued to Monday,
August 1, 1994. In addition, staff recommends establish-
ment of additional General Plan Public Hearings on August
2, and August 9, 1994.
Requested by: Community Development Director
9. OLD BUSINESS:
9.1 APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 47851 LOCATED EASTERLY OF WAGON
TRAIN LANE -OAK KNOLL DRIVE, ET AL, IN "THE COUNTRY" -
This project provides for subdivision of 60 acres into a
48 lot single family residential development. Lots will
range in size from .5 gross acres to over 10 gross acres.
The map has been submitted to the City for final tract
map approval.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council 1) find that the final map for Tract No. 47851
substantially complies with the conditionally -approved
vesting tentative map and approve said map; abandon
certain prior offers of dedication and easements not
shown, reject certain offers and accept on behalf of the
public, easements and rights offered all as provided
thereon; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute the
Subdivision Agreement, Tri -Party Agreement (Subdivision,
Walnut Valley Water District and City) and bonds on
behalf of the City; 3) authorize the City Engineer to
sign the map and 4) direct the City Clerk to sign as
provided thereon and process the map for recordation by
the County Recorder.
Requested by: City Engineer
9.2 DISCUSSION RE: ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS, BEGINNING TIME FOR
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, AND OTHER ISSUES RELATED
TO THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - Continued from
JULY 19, 1994 PAGE 4
June 21, 1994.
Requested by: City Council
9.3 BROWN ACT - EFFECT UPON CITY COUNCIL, LESS THAN A QUORUM.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council
modify the existing continuing subject matter committee
approach to issue analysis by eliminating that type of
less than a quorum committee; and replacing less than a
quorum of the Council issue analysis with a specific
issue ad hoc committee approach.
Requested by: City Manager
9.4 DISCUSSION RE: CITY COUNCIL SUB COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Requested by: City Manager
9.5 DISCUSSION RE: INVITATION FROM MAYOR OF HAICHENG CITY,
LIAONING PROVINCE, CHINA, FOR A DELEGATION FROM THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR TO ATTEND THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL FOLK
ARTS FESTIVAL.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council discuss this matter and direct staff as
necessary.
Requested by: Mayor Werner
9.6 DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS - To prohibit placing City Council
Members' names on public works construction project
signs. Continued from June 21, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council no longer place names of Council Members on
public works construction project signs.
Requested by: MPT/Harmony
9.7 CITY ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR DIRECTION ON AMICUS CURIAE
MATTERS - Verbal presentation by City Attorney.
Continued from June 21, 1994.
Requested by: City Attorney.
10. NZW BUSINZSS:
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGONAL PARKING AT HERITAGE PARK
COMMUNITY CENTER - The Diamond Bar Senior Citizen's Club
is requesting additional parking along the Heritage Park
Community Center frontage on Brea Canyon Rd. On April
14, 1994, the Traffic & Transportation Commission
recommended implementation of diagonal parking on Brea
JULY 19, 1994 PAGE 5
Canyon Rd. Pursuant to Section 22502 of the California
Vehicle Code, parallel parking is allowed in front of the
Heritage Park Community Center.
Recommended Action: It is recommended by the Traffic &
Transportation Commission that the Council approve
installation of diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Rd.
However, staff recommends that the Council deny said
installation and direct staff to consider on -street
parking alternatives as part of the future Brea Canyon
Rd. Improvement Project.
Requested by: City Engineer
10.2 REQUEST FOR PARKING ALONG SOUTHBOUND DIAMOND BAR BLVD.
BETWEEN ACACIA HILL AND MORNING CANYON RDS. - St. Denis
Catholic Church, 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., requested
permission from to park along southbound D.B. Blvd.
between Acacia Hill and Morning Canyon RDS. on Sundays.
Staff presented this item to the Traffic & Transportation
Commission and recommended that St. Denis Catholic Church
not be permitted to park along D.B. Blvd. on a regular
basis (i.e., every Sunday). However, the Commission has
recommended that St. Denis' request to park on Sundays be
granted for two years.
Recommended Action: It is recommended by the Traffic &
Transportation Commission that the Council approve
on -street parking for a two-year period. However, staff
recommends that the Council deny the request for
on -street parking on a permanent basis on Sundays along
southbound D.B. Blvd., between Acacia Hill and Morning
Canyon Rds.
Requested by: City Engineer
11. ANNOUNCZKZNTS :
12. CLOSED SESSION: May convene to consider: Matters of
pending litigation (G.C. 54956.9), Personnel (G.C. 54957.6),
or purchase/sale of real property (G.C. 54956.8). Records not
available for public inspection.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
CITY CLERK
bpoie E (p S DATE: 17q -
/- 9a�
� &C% —0 rvk PHONE:
sem-
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
ignature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: -CITY CLERK
FROM: /%`. �.�c� z �_.. DATE:
ADDRESS: PHONE: 0 6�
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:�'`'�-�Z-�-``'
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Sig ture
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: / DATE:
ADDRESS: I i r�f PHONE:
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: �r
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO CITY CLERK I I �
FR M: 1 G1/VV l t J Ih, DATE: v
AD' RESS: 16 6 i S �t--e`er c� PHONE:
OF(3A.NIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 1
J cam) ti, ,• s
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
narne and address as written above.
"I _�,g D6�
-, 1
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: D if DATE:
ADDRESS: Z t F &,-r wi `y PHONE: �� Q7 Y?-
ORGANIZATION:
ZORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: `
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: A? DATE:
ADDRESS: PHONE:
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: �`�'=' `"��T'`" 7
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO CITY CLERK
FROM: DATE:
ADDRESS: / L`, ,G 1i'�`- l� ���R PHONE:,5
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as'written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: -CITY CLERK
FROM: �M / L'A DATE:
ADDRESS: �� S,j b��� �� PHONE:
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: _ ��� L 7-d AffC-4y A L CA-) A,6As T1 o "J
Td V,3
D��� T•'T U� s �F ��,� d v 1� y
�C �i'/V/U//v G' � �%H /f :P%O � �✓/�/'�' G,� �G U�i4C'�"Z.� /V,� � �'/� �/''�J,
7P. P"/- & i el)n, j)
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
0J* VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNC _
1.
TC CITY CLERK
DAT.-
FF DIV: !i% �� -
AE DRESS:
PHC NE: -
OF GANIZATION:
AC ENDA #/SUBJECT:
r! I expect to ,address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
-k)
Signature
AGENDA #/SUBJECT. -
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item.
name and address as written above. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
'TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: W ; 1 � v r 6.
�A DATE: 4� So
ADDRESS: ,•z w,'Wall" PHONE:
ORGANIZATION: p
AGENDA #t/SUBJECT: 1 % jL4�, �/ 7�.5 /
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
0 16,)J� /1 4t�,r
Signature
7M
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
-CITY CLERKt
IA) 1• �y r 6:- • DATE: %
PHONE: f 0Q , d 7 yZ
WWW
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
L)1� I .
TO: -CITY CLERK
/•
FROM: J'��Z `_. � DATE: 2—
ADDRESS:
1ADDRESS: PHONE: d—� fp ZZ1
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
v
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
VOLUNTAnv RECIUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: DATE:
ADDRESS: PHONE:---)
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT- 1
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET
N
9
w
I Fiscal Year 1994 - 95
U
U
July 19, 1994
f
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 1, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
REVISED
SUBJECT: Proposed City of Diamond Bar Budget -Fiscal Year 1994-1995
INTRODUCTION:
I am pleased to transmit to you the Fiscal Year 1994-95 City of
Diamond Bar Annual Budget. The FY 1994-95 budget has been prepared
- and developed utilizing the City Council's strategic priorities of
highest quality services, economic development, and maintenance,
repair, improvement and expansion of City assets as an interlocking
foundation.
The 1994-95 Budget for the City of Diamond Bar is presented to you in
this document. General Fund revenues are estimated to be $10,319,015.
Proposed City General Fund appropriations total $8,833,526, a 3.7
percent decrease from the previous year's appropriations of
$9,176,853.
REVENUE OUTLOOK:
The City general operating funds' resources are forecasted at
$10,319,015 for 1994-95. This represents an decrease of 2.75 percent
from the total operating funds' revenue estimated to be received
during 1993-94 ($10,602,800).
The City's major revenue source is the motor vehicle in -lieu tax.
$2,430,000 is anticipated to received in FY 94-95, which is $70,000
less than the anticipated amount that is to be received in FY 93-94.
The City's second largest revenue source, sales tax, is projected at
$2,200,000, a 10 percent increase from 1992-93 estimated revenue.
- Sales tax revenue projections for 1994-95 are higher than those
approved by the City Council for 1993-94, which is based on actual
revenues. However, it is fiscally prudent to evaluate at least two
- quarters, before determining whether mid -year adjustments to the
anticipated sales tax revenues should be undertaken.
Property tax revenues, the City's third largest revenue source,
reflects the positive affect of the property tax allocation agreement
reached by the City and the County of Los Angeles, which settled a
lawsuit between the agencies. As a part of the repayment of past due
-- property taxes, the City will receive $775,000, August, 1994, which is
the second of three repayment installments. The final installment of
$775,000 will be received, in August, 1995. Estimated FY 94-95
property tax revenues are $1,936,000.
1
BUDGET MESSAGE: FY 94-95 REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE TWO
The City has begun a program to recover actual costs for planning,
zoning, building, and engineering services, in accordance with AB1600
legislation. During 1994-95, under AB 1600 provisions, the City will
1) update the fees for services schedule (which hasn't been changed
for three years); and 2) institute a Development Impact Fee Program to
assure that development activities contribute to the funding of future
public infrastructure improvements.
The 1994-95 budget continues to anticipate the future basis for State
subvention allocation revenue. At incorporation, the City's
population was established at 74,115, which was based on a State
formula that sets newly incorporated city's population at three times
the number of registered voters at the time of incorporation. The
City will continue to receive State per capita revenue subventions,
based upon the 74,115 population number, through the 1996-97 fiscal
year. The 1990 Federal Census has set the City's population at an
estimated 53,500. There has been a slight population increase since
1990 to an estimated 54,600. As a consequence, the State formula
population (74,115), compared to the current population (54,600),
provides the City $800,000 in General Fund revenues and $350,000 in
Gas Tax revenues, that will be lost when the State begins to utilize
actual rather than incorporation population numbers. Revenue
enhancement decisions must be implemented over the next few fiscal
years to eradicate the affects of the formula population subsidies.
The property tax allocation agreement will help to partially
"backfill" lost revenues. Nevertheless, the City Council must
continue to be open to creating and expanding the City's revenue base.
1994-95 BUDGET SUMMARY:
The City of Diamond Bar will conclude the 1993-94 fiscal year in a
stable financial position. The proposed 1994-95 operating budget,
being forwarded to the City Council is based upon existing levels of
service. Twenty-five (25) full-time staff positions are proposed.
However, there is proposed an full-time staff addition, with the
Public Works Director/City Engineer position being proposed as a full-
time staff position. This change will result in a budget savings of
$50,000. This budget proposal recommends the elimination of the
Transportation Planner position, which saves $67,650 in Prop A monies.
The Public Safety appropriation would provide for an increase in
services, with the partial funding of an Asian relations deputy.
There will also be inflation -related increases to contract goods and
services.
In terms of major functions, $6,873,350 or 77.8 percent of the general
operating funds budget, is devoted to public safety, public works/
engineering, community services and community development. Allocated
to public safety operations is 44.6 percent, or $3,939,830 of the
operating funds.
2
BUDGET MESSAGE
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE THREE
Public Safety
REVISED
The 1994-95 appropriations for law enforcement services, through a
contract with the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, total $3,850,500
compared with $3,795,749 in 1993-94. Traffic enforcement vehicles
have been diversified to include motorcycles, as well as, the usual
traffic automobiles. The SANE Program, which serves Diamond Bar
located Walnut Valley and Pomona District schools, continues to be
funded at a full-time level. The LASO contract will provide for the
partial funding of an Asian Relations Deputy.
Monies have been appropriated for Emergency Preparedness services
($27,600), which includes the completion of the mobile emergency
operations center. Also, Emergency Preparedness includes regional plan
coordination, City emergency plan revisions, neighborhood -based
emergency plan implementation. Emergency Preparedness activities will
accomplished through the utilization of staff employees and community
volunteers.
Animal Control services are provided through a contract with the
Pomona Valley Humane Society ($54,200), which reflects a 7.75%
increase over FY 93-94. The increase is a result of increased
operating services costs. It should be also noted that there hasn't
been a contractual increase for two years.
Public Works
The Public Works Director/City Engineer position is being proposed to
be accomplished through a full-time professional staff position. The
professional staff Public Works Director/City Engineer is expected to
provide a higher level of operating effectiveness and efficiencies.
Some engineering support services are accomplished by contract (e.g.,
traffic engineering, plan checking, construction inspection, etc.).
However, in order to provide more responsive client services and to
expedite City capital improvement projects, full-time staff Senior
Engineer, Assist4nt Engineer, Administrative Assistant and Secretary
positions will continue to be funded. Also being proposed is the
entering into a public works maintenance contract (time and materials
basis), with the City of Brea. There is a proposed overall reduction
in appropriations of 19.54% ($313,288) for FY 94-95. The proposed
Public Works budget is $1,289,700.
Community Services
The Community Services Department is staffed with a Community Services
Director, an Administrative Assistant, a Parks Superintendent and a
Parks Maintenance Man. In May 1991, Diamond Bar began to directly
- provide recreation services through a contract with the City of Brea,
which has provided for ever-expanding recreation programs and
activities being offered throughout the community. One of the more
exciting programs is the Concert in the Park series, at Sycamore Park
($10,500). In 94-95, the Concert series will present eight concerts.
3
BUDGET MESSAGE REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE FOUR
Community Services management supports and administers the recreation _
services contract and staffs the Parks and Recreation Commission. The
recreation staff has been relocated to Sycamore Cyn Park. As a
result, this proposal allocates $5,000 for furniture and equipment
Recreation services activities fees will generate an estimated
$289,500 in revenue. Parks personnel are responsible for the contract
maintenance of City parks and open space and Lighting and Landscaping
Districts 38, 39 and 41. There is a proposed reduction in Community -
Department expenditures of 1.8% ($18,090) for FY 94-95.
Community Development
The Community Development Department is comprised of planning, zoning,
building safety and code enforcement. Building Safety services are
provided through a contract with a private company. The contractor is -
paid a percentage of the building code fees collected. It is
estimated that the cost Building Safety services will be the same as
in FY 93-94 ($220,000). The preparation of the City's General Plan is
to be completed and adopted, in FY 94-95. Consultant's costs for the
preparation and processing of the General Plan are included in the FY
94-95 Budget. Also, Community Development will be revising the City's
Development Code, to bring it into conformance with the General Plan. -
The amount allocated for the General Plan completion and the
Development preparation is $35,000. The City has adopted a property
maintenance ordinance, which is expected to result in some increases _
in code enforcement costs. The Community Development budget has a
proposed allocation of $6,000, which would fund code enforcement
prosecution services. This amount for prosecution of code violations
is an estimate based upon the experience of other municipalities with
similar ordinances. The total appropriation for the Community
Development Department is $658,350, which is 5.8% ($40,550) less than
the FY 93-94 appropriation.
General Government
The General Government Department will increase by $93,050 (14.4%).
Appropriations have been made for a replacement truck ($12,000), which
was "totaled" in an accident. Also, there are allocations for office
equipment (paper shredder and cash register)($4,500); computer
software (network upgrade, graphics/image editing)($5,000); computer
hardware (network printer, PCs for pavement management, Community
Development and Assistant City Manager)($12,500); and, a voice mail -
system ($9,800).
$6,000 has been appropriated for professional services in Finance to
cover the time when the Senior Accountant and Account Clerk are both
simultaneously off on maternity leave. As a related issue, it is
recommended that the audit firm that has audited the City's financial
systems the past four fiscal years, continue to provide audit services
for FY 93-94 financial systems. In significant part, the primary
reason for this recommendation is due to the reality that two of the
three Finance Division employees will not be available during the
audit period.
4
BUDGET MESSAGE
REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE FIVE
This budget allocates $155,000 for lease of City Hall offices. It is
recommended that, during the first quarter of FY 94-95, the Staff
prepare a feasibility study regarding the possibility of purchasing a
building for a "short-term" City Hall. This budget also allocates
$5,000 for a management audit of Council and Staff performance. There
is an appropriation of $10,000 for Economic Development planning and
implementation.
Legislative Department
The Legislative Services, which include the City Council, City
Attorney, City Manager and City Clerk functions, will experience an
overall decrease in 1994-95, from $1,089,100 to $837,360. This is due
to the settlement of several lawsuits. It should also be noted that
there is not an election allocation in this budget, although it is
recognized that an election related to the adoption of the General
Plan is a possibility. It is recommended that the allocation for such
an election be made at the time the election is called by the Council.
The preparation of the municipal code for the City will be completed
in FY 94-95, with an appropriation of $10,000 to complete the project.
FY 94-95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
- The 1994-95 budget includes the City's annual Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). The CIP reflects projections of capital improvement
needs for the upcoming year. Major projects funded in FY 93-94 which
are under construction and due to be completed in FY 93-94 include:
-Shadow Canyon Traffic Signal
-Fountain Springs Traffic Signal
-Handicap Access Sidewalk Ramps
The Capital Improvement Program appropriations in 1994-95 are funding
the annual CIP. The total capital improvements appropriations will be
$6,239,730. The.funds to support the CIP come from a variety of
sources including: General Fund, Intermodal Surface Transportation
Enhancement Act (ISTEA); Gas Tax; Proposition "A" (transportation);
- Proposition "C" (transportation); Proposition "A" (parks); Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG); Traffic Safety (OTS); Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (MTA) grant; Grand Avenue Traffic Mitigation
-- Fund; and Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 38. The
proposed capital projects to be funded in FY 94-95 include:
Street Improvements
-Grand Avenue Overlay (East City Limit to Golden Springs)
-Diamond Bar Blvd Overlay: Phase I (Grand Ave to Brea Cyn)
-Citywide Slurry Seal -Phase V
-Diamond Bar Blvd Sidewalks
-Golden Sprngs - Seepage Repair (Sylvan Glen)
-Golden Sprngs Medians - West City Limit to Gona Ct.
-Diamond Blvd - Concrete Bus Pads
5
BUDGET MESSAGE
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE SIX
1 61'1 1 I • 1 e i 1_z...Y 1
Traffic Control Improvements
REVISED
-Diamond Bar Blvd @ Fountain Springs
-Diamond Bar Blvd @ Shadow Canyon
-Golden Springs @ Prospectors (north)
-Golden Springs @ Golden Prados
-Golden Springs @ Carpio
-Grand Ave Traffic Signal Synchronization
-Left-Hand Turn Signals (DB Blvd @ SB Golden Springs)
-NB DBar Blvd @ Pathfinder Rd - Left Turn Signal
-DB Blvd @ SR57 On/Off Ramps - Traffic Signals
-Grand Ave @ Longview - Signal Mast Arm Extension -
-Three (3) Traffic Signals - To Be Determined
Based on warrant studies at the following:
-DBar Blvd @ Tin Dr
-DBar Blvd @ Gold Rush
-DBar Blvd @ Silver Hawk
-DBar Blvd @ Palomino Dr
-Golden Sprngs Dr @ Calbourne Dr
-Golden Sprngs Dr @ Racquet Club Rd
-Pathfinder Rd @ Peaceful Hills Rd
-Sunset Crsng Rd @ SB SR57 -
Parks Improvements
-Pantera Park Design and Development
-Peterson Park Athletic Field Lights
-Handicap Access to Parks Facilities Retrofit (ADA)
-City Parks Signage Retrofit
-Various Parks Improvements - Quimby Fee Funded
Municipal Building And Facilities
-Feasibility Analysis - Purchase of City Hall
-Land Acquisition - Walnut Valley Water Dist. (Brea Cyn Rd)
-Diamond Bar Blvd Park & Ride Improvements - @ SR60/SR57
In addition to the capital improvement projects that the City is --
funding directly from City"resources, there are two other projects of
note. First, the City and Southern California Edison will be jointly
undergrounding the utility poles from Temple Avenue to Gold Rush _
Drive. The City will be committing its Rule 20 monies for the next
seven (7) years ($430,000 existing and each year's thereafter) to fund
the undergrounding construction. The undergrounding project total is
an estimated $1,500,000. Second, a traffic signal is to be installed _
at Brea Cyn Cut-off at Fallowfield, in conjunction with a residential
development currently under construction in Los Angeles County.
6
BUDGET MESSAGE: FY 94-95
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE SEVEN
SPECIAL FUNDS:
REVISED
Gas Tax: Estimated Gas Tax resources available in FY 94-95
is $3,655,481. It is proposed that the Gas Tax Fund
allocate $647,315 to the General Fund to fund street
cleaning, parkway maintenance, curbs, gutters and sidewalk
repair, non -project related inspections and staff services.
The FY 94-95 Budget allocates $2,192,105 to the Capital
Improvement Fund(s) to fund the following proposed projects:
-Grand Avenue Overlay (East City Limit/Golden Springs)
-Phase V - Slurry Seal Program ( Western Diamond Bar)
-Diamond Bar Blvd Rehab (Grand/Brea Cyn Rd)
-SB Golden Sprngs/Diamond Bar Blvd - Left Turn Signal
-Golden Sprngs Repair re Seepage (Sylvan Glen)
-SB/NB Brea Cyn Rd @ Golden Sprngs - Left Turn Signals
-NB Diamond Bar @ Pathfinder - Left Turn Signal
-DB Blvd @ Shadow Cyn/Fountain Sprngs - Traffic Signals
-Golden Sprngs @ Prospectors - Traffic Signal
-Golden Sprngs @ Golden Prados - Traffic Signal
Golden Sprngs @ Carpio - Traffic Signal
-Grand @ Longview - Traffic Signal Mast Arm Extension
-DB Blvd @ SR57 On/Off Ramps - Traffic Signals
-DB Blvd Sidewalks
-Rule 20A Utilities Undergrounding - Street Lights
-Construction of Three Traffic Signals Based On Eight
Traffic Signal Warrant Studies
A total of $2,839,420 will be allocated from the Gas Tax
Fund, which would result in an unappropriated reserve of
approximately $816,061.
Air Quality Fund: The FY 94-95 Budget allocates $5,000 to
implement the City's the Air Quality Element Implementation
Plan. There is an allocation of $5,000 to fund continuing
participation in the East San Gabriel Valley Joint Powers
Authority. $1,100 has been allocated to partially fund
annual membership dues for the San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments. $1,700 is allocated for City Link legislative
services. $5,000 is allocated for City On -Line system
improvements, which would be accomplished, in part, with the
assistance of the Computer Services Committee. 25% of the
Assistant to City Manager's time is allocated to this fund.
The total fund budget for FY 94-95 is $36,510. The
- resulting unappropriated reserve would be approximately
$36,584.
7
BUDGET MESSAGE: FY 94-95 REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE EIGHT -
Park Fees Fund (Quimby Act): The proposed Budget estimates
resources to be $295,690. $30,000 is allocated to retrofit -
all City park signs, to remove references to Los Angeles
County. $44,630 is allocated to fund a variety of parks
improvements, which would be recommended for funding by the -
Parks and Recreation Commission. The estimated fund balance
would be $221,057.
Traffic Safety Fund: The FY 94-95 Budget estimates revenues
of $75,600. The $75,600 in revenues is allocated to the
General Fund to fund traffic safety related services.
Proposition C Fund: The FY 94-95 Budget estimates available
resources to be $1,976,580. The estimated Prop. C annual
revenues are estimated to be $438,150. The revenue source _
for this Fund is sales tax revenues from within the County.
The Fund will receive a $270,000 grant from LAMTA, for Grand
Ave. traffic signal synchronization. The City will match
the amount of the synchronization grant out of Prop C monies -
($180,000). Total traffic synchronization costs are
estimated to be $450,000. This Fund is proposed to
partially fund the rehabilitation of Diamond Bar Blvd.,
between Grand Ave. and Brea Canyon Rd. ($420,000). $30,000
has been allocated to complete the Pavement Management Plan.
The estimated Fund balance would be $1,076,580.
Proposition A (Transit) Fund: In FY 93-94, the City
partial'v subsidized the Diamond Bar Library Branch (two
additio. 1 days per week ($60,000) and media materials -
($10,000). The General Fund was the source of the subsidy.
It is estimated that approximately $i60,000 would be
necessary to subsidize two additional days per week for FY
94-95. Tf the City decides to subsidize library services,
it is recommended that up to $40,000 be considered for
allocation to purchase library media materials. In order to
conserve the General Fund to the maximum extent possible, it -
is recommended that the City sell $310,000 of Proposition A
Funds. It is important to note that several cities have
offered between $.60 and $.65 in General Fund dollars for
each Proposition A dollar. Therefore, it is recommended
that the City establish a Library Services Fund, with the
funding source the sale of Proposition A monies and the FY -
94-95 budget amount of $200,000.
It is recommended that the Para -Transit ($27,000),
Excursions ($25,000) and Holiday Shuttle ($27,000) programs -
continue to be funded. And, that monies be allocated for
concrete bus pads on Diamond Bar Blvd ($150,000) and park
and ride expansion, at SR60/SR57 ($75,000). -
-8-
BUDGET MESSAGE REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE NINE
Proposition A (Transit) Fund (cont):
It is recommended that a transit and rail pass subsidy
_ program be established. The proposed subsidy would be 20%
for general public and students and 50% for seniors and
handicapped. Based upon current monthly pass fees, an
estimated $80,000 would be needed to administer ($5,000) and
subsidize annually ($75,000) 150 riders in each of the three
categories of ridership.
The estimated Prop A resources, in FY 94-95, are $1,457,600.
Proposed expenditures for FY 94-95 are $734,000. The
estimated Fund reserve balance is $723,600.
Community Development Block Grant Fund: The proposed
revenue for FY 94-95 is $433,780. Proposed allocations for
FY 94-95 are $414,588. Estimated Fund reserves are $19,192.
Integrated Solid waste Management Fund: This Fund provides
for the administration of the City's solid waste management
activities and the implementation of programs recommended in
the City's SRRE (Source Reduction and Recycling Element).
Currently, consultants and staff are engaged in the
implementation of residential sector programs: multi -family
recycling, on-site composting, public education/information
-- and monitoring. Commercial sector programs being
implemented include: at -source recovery/recycling,
representative waste audit, education/information and
monitoring programs. The costs associated with these
programs.,are already a part of the FY 94-95 Integrated Waste
Management Fund. Estimated resources are $143,032.
Proposed allocated expenditures are estimated to be $96,500.
The estimated Fund balance reserve.is $46,532.
-9-
BUDGET MESSAGE REVISED
JUNE 1, 1994
PAGE TEN -
CONCLUSION: FY 94-95 MUNICIPAL BUDGET
The City Council will be reviewing and adopting the Fiscal Year 1994-
1995 Diamond Bar Municipal Budget, in June 1994. The Council will
hear testimony on the Budget, on June 7 and June 21, 1994. The
Municipal Budget reflects the proposed levels of municipal services
and the manner in which those services are to be delivered; either by
contract, or by city staff. The Budget sets forth the revenue sources
and estimated revenue levels necessary to fund the proposed
expenditures. However, the Municipal Budget is a dynamic
revenue/expenditure plan. In short, the 1994-95 budget has been
structured to have the flexibility to be modified, as changing
circumstances may require.
The City of Diamond Bar will continue to implement the community
values that have been identified, through public participatory forums,
e.g., Council, Commission, Committee, work sessions, community meet-
ings and others. The City organization will continue to respond to
and reflect the same high quality of services that is demanded by the
public. Besides accommodating operating service demand, the 1994-95
budget addresses long term planning needs and plan implementation. -
The FY 94-95 budget proposes an ambitious capital asset enhancement,
revitalization and expansion program, which provides for major
projects of capital improvements to benefit the City's infrastructure
and fixed assets.
Preparing and recommending a balanced budget to the City Council is
always a difficult process, considering the limited financial -
resources and the wide variety of citizen requests. The demands for
expenditure level increases, coupled with the recessed economic
environment, have made the preparation of this budget particularly -
challenging.
The 1994-95 budget for the City of Diamond Bar continues the sound and _
fiscally prudent.approach of balancing the demand for high quality
services and programs with the reality of resource limitations and
availability. The City Council should take justifiable pride in the
tremendous progress the City has made, over the five years of
cityhood. All involved with the City look forward, with enthusiasm,
to assuring that Diamond Bar continues to be an exceptional community,
in which to live and work. To that end, it is my pleasure to convey
to you the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Municipal Budget.
-10-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
BUDGET PHILOSOPHY AND OPERATING GUIDELINES
1. The City of Diamond Bar's budget is designed to serve four
major purposes:
• definition of policy in compliance with legal
requirements for General Law cities in the State of
-- California, Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(GASB) financial reporting requirements and audit
standards, and fiscal directions of the City Council.
• utilization as an operations guide for administrative
staff in the management and control of fiscal resources.
• presentation of the City's financial plan for the ensuing
fiscal year, itemizing projected revenues and estimated
expenditures.
• illustration as a communications document for citizens
who wish to understand the operations and costs of City
services.
2. Departmental budgets will be originated within each
department.
3. where applicable, the department head will assign priorities
to projects and activities in preparing program budgets for
the department.
4. Department Heads are responsible for operating within their
budget amount as approved by the City Manager and authorized
by the City Council.
5. The City Council has the legal authority to amend the budget
at any time during the fiscal year. The City Manager has the
authority to make administrative adjustments to the budget as
long as those changes will neither have a significant policy
impact nor affect budgeted year-end fund balances.
6. Current year requirements of the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) will be incorporated into the annual operational budget
and defined as the capital budget.
7. Fund balances will be maintained at levels which will protect.
the City from future uncertainties.
-11-
U)
W
U
O'^
VJ
�W/ L
I.L 0)
Z
L r
J
Q
W
Z
rW
V
N
C
O
:r
C
cn
N
(C
co
O
co
N
O
O
ti
ti
LO
N
C4
—12_
�v
m
c
U-
Q
N
m
2
N1
C v
O
I— O
O
o N
M N
ti
60
LO
O
N
69
O.
O
a
rn
�
m
a
L
N
U
c
0
>
o
y
7
U
x
ca
Ci
s
O
00
O
C%j
o
co
�
N
C
O
:r
C
cn
N
(C
co
O
co
N
O
O
ti
ti
LO
N
C4
—12_
�v
m
c
U-
Q
N
m
2
N1
C v
O
I— O
O
o N
M N
ti
60
LO
O
N
69
c
N
E
C
N
O
C
N
E
O O
> N
N
OR
T e
d:
C
7 00
E
E
O
U
0
O
Ln
M
co
b9
f�
N
O
J
0
LO
of
O
tD
M
ti
M
co
69
c
cu
H
c
7
N
c
M
tD
d'
M
O
M
69
CO
N
LO
M
C)
00
co
63
i
C
N
Q
X
W
iv
O
F—
-13-
-14-
>
0
Z
z0
O
�
c
W
O a
= O
O J
r
Gt >
W
e
cz
U
>
O`
c
co
>O`
O�
z
s
cz3
=
O
>u
so
JY
�c
O !
w
r
O
=
a
•
�
Z
i
<
fV
r
►r
a3 �.
CO
)
r
F
f�
~w
:
~
W
0
�V\
XIL
•
V
c
i< �
•
Z
z
_
200
!O
o•
JO p
h C
Vw
as.
0Z
2zt�
<
J
r o
ti
i
e
•
•
e
w
z
!O
z
W,
r-_
.
O
S
W •
z• �
>w
tri
<O
<
c
Yz o
!
00
Da
r
►
t!
-14-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PERSONNEL SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 1994-95
FULL TIME
POSITION 1993-94 1994-95
Approved Actual Prate A"
-City Manager
1
1
1
-Assistant City Manager
1
1
1
-Community Develop. Dir.
1
1
1
-Public Works Director
0
0
1
-Dir. of Community Services
1
1
1
-City Clerk
1
1
1
-Accounting Manager
1
1
1
-Assistant to City Manager
1
1
1
-Associate Planner
1
1
1
-Transportation Planner
1
0
0
-senior Engineer
1
1
1
-Senior Accountant
1
1
1
-Supt of Parks & Mtnce.
1
1
1
-Secretary to City Manager
1
1
1
-Administrative Assistant
3
3
3
-Community Rel Officer
1
1
1
-Deputy City Clerk
1
1
1
-Administrative Secretary
1
1
1
-Secretary
1
1
1
-Assistant Planner
1
1
1
-Assistant Civil Engr.
1
1
1
-Code Enforcement Officer
1
1
1
-Maintenance Worker II
1
1
1
-Clerk Typist
1
1
1
Totals
25
24
25
PART TIME
POSITION 1993-94 1994-95
Approved Actual Prcmeed A=
-Account Clerk
1
1
1
-Clerk Typist
1
1
1
-Comm. Serv. Coordntr
2
1
2
-Comm. Serv. Leader
2
2
2
-Pks Maint Helper
0
3
3
-Planning Intern
1
1
2
-Administrative Intern
2
1
3
Totals
9
10
14
-15-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
FY 1993-94
(3.5%) _
JOB TITLE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Receptionist
776
7.76
8.15
8.56
8.99
9.44
9.91
10.41
1,345.86
1,413.16
1,483.82
1,558.01
1,635.91
1,717.70
1,803.59
16,150.38
16,957.90
17,805.79
18,696.08
19,630.88
20,612.43
21,643.05
Jr, Clerk Typist
899
8.99
9.44
9.91
10.41
10.93
11.47
12.05
1,558.01
1,635.91
1,717.70
1,803.59
1,893.77
1,988.46
2,087.88
18,696.10
19,630.90
20,612.45
21,643.07
22,725.22
23,861.49
25,054.56
Clerk Typist
966
9.66
10.15
10.65
11.19
11.75
12.33
12.95
1,674.86
1,758.61
1,846.54
1,938.87
2,035.81
2,137.60
2,244.48
20,098.38
21,103.30
22,158.46
23,266.39
24,429.71
25,651.19
_
26,933.75
Account Clerk I
966
9.66
10.15
10.65
11.19
11.75
12.33
12.95
1,674.86
1,758.61
1,846.54
1,938.87
2,035.81
2,137.60
2,244.48 -
20,098.38
21,103.30
22,158.46
23,266.39
24,429.71
25,651.19
26,933.75
Adminstrative
1058
10.58
11.11
11.67
12.25
12.86
13.51
14.18 _
Analyst
1,834.42
1,926.14
2,022.45
2,123.57
2,229.75
2,341.24
2,458.30
22,013.06
23,113.71
24,269.39
25,482.86
26,757.01
28,094.86
29,499.60
Secretary
1062
10.62
11.16
11.71
12.30
12.91
13.56
14.24
1,841.57
1,933.65
2,030.33
2,131.85
2,238.44
2,350.36
2,467.88
22,098.86
23,203.81
24,364.00
25,582.20
26,861.31
28,204.37
29,614.59
Code Enforcement
1111
11.11
11.67
12.25
12.86
13.51
14.18
14.89
Officer
1,926.26
2,022.57
2,123.70
2,229.88
2,341.38
2,458.45
2,581.37
23,115.08
24,270.84
25,484.38
26,758.60
28,096.53
29,501.35
30,976.42 -
Parks Maintenance
1121
11.21
11.77
12.35
12.97
13.62
14.30
15.02
Worker II
1,942.31
2,039.42
2,141.39
2,248.46
2,360.88
2,478.93
2,602.88
23,307.66
24,473.05
25,696.70
26,981.54
28,330.61
29,747.14
31,234.50
Deputy City Clerk
1171
11.71
12.29
12.91
13.55
14.23
14.94
15.69
2,029.61
2,131.09
2,237.65
2,349.53
2,467.01
2,590.36
2,719.88
24,355.37
25,573.13
26,851.79
28,194.38
29,604.10
31,084.30
32,638.52
Administrative
1171
11.71
12.29
12.91
13.55
14.23
14.94
15.69 --
Secretary
2,029.61
2,131.09
2,237.65
2,349.53
2,467.01
2,590.36
2,719.88
24,355.37
25,573.13
26,851.79
28,194.38
29,604.10
31,084.30
32,638.52
Administrative
1171
11.71
12.29
12.91
13.55
14.23
14.94
15.69
Assistant
2,029.61
2,131.09
2,237.65
2,349.53
2,467.01
2,590.36
2,719.88
24,355.37
25,573.13
26,851.79
28,194.38
29,604.10
31,084.30
32,638.52
Engineering
1415
14.15
14.86
15.60
16.38
17.20
18.06
18.96
Technician
2,452.73
2,575.36
2,704.13
2,839.34
2,981.31
3,130.37
3,286.89
29,432.74
30,904.38
32,449.60
34,072.08
35,775.68
37,564.47
39,442.69 -
-16-
29,432.74 30,904.38 32,449.60 34,072.08 35,775.68 37,564.47 39,442.69
Secretary to the 1523
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
15.99
16.79
17.62
-
SALARY RANGES BY
POSITION
City Manager
2,639.01
2,770.96
FY 1993-94
3,054.98
3,207.73
3,368.12
3,536.52
(3.5°x)
33,251.51
34,914.09
36,659.79
38,492.78
JOB TITLE
A B C
D
E
F
G
_
Planning
1415 14.15 14.86 15.60
16.38
17.20
18.06
18.96
Technician
2,452.73 2,575.36 2,704.13
2,839.34
2,981.31
3,130.37
3,286.89
29,432.74 30,904.38 32,449.60
34,072.08
35,775.68
37,564.47
39,442.69
Community Relations
1415 14.15 14.86 15.60
16.38
17.20
18.06
18.96
Coordinator
2,452.73 2,575.36 2,704.13
2,839.34
2,981.31
3,130.37
3,286.89
29,432.74 30,904.38 32,449.60 34,072.08 35,775.68 37,564.47 39,442.69
Secretary to the 1523
15.23
15.99
16.79
17.62
18.51
19.43
20.40
City Manager
2,639.01
2,770.96
2,909.51
3,054.98
3,207.73
3,368.12
3,536.52
31,668.11
33,251.51
34,914.09
36,659.79
38,492.78
40,417.42
42,438.29
Assistant Civil 1523
15.23
15.99
16.79
17.62
18.51
19.43
20.40
- Engineer
2,639.01
2,770.96
2,909.51
3,054.98
3,207.73
3,368.12
3,536.52
31,668.11
33,251.51
34,914.09
36,659.79
38,492.78
40,417.42
42,438.29
Assistant Planner 1523
15.23
15.99
16.79
17.62
18.51
19.43
20.40
2,639.01
2,770.96
2,909.51
3,054.98
3,207.73
3,368.12
3,536.52
31,668.11.
33,251.51
34,914.09
36,659.79
38,492.78
40,417.42
42,438.29
Assistant to the 1523
15.23
15.99
16.79
17.62
18.51
19.43
20.40
City Manager
2,639.01
2,770.96
2,909.51
3,054.98
3,207.73
3,368.12
3,536.52
31,668.11
33,251.51
34,914.09
36,659.79
38,492.78
40,417.42
42,438.29
Superintendent of 1767
17.67
18.55
19.48
20.46
21.48
22.55
23.68
Parks/Maintenance
3,062.82
3,215.97
3,376.76
3,545.60
3,722.88
3,909.03
4,104.48
--
36,753.89
38,591.59
40,521.17
42,547.22
44,674.59
46,908.31
49,253.73
Senior Accountant 1767
17.67
18.55
19.48
20.46
21.48
22.55
23.68
3,062.82
3,215.97
3,376.76
3,545.60
3,722.88
3,909.03
4,104.48
36,753.89
38,591.59
40,521.17
42,547.22
44,674.59
46,908.31
49,253.73
Associate Planner 1851
8.99
9.44
9.91
10.41
10.93
23.62
24.80
1,558.01
1,635.91
1,717.70
1,803.59
1,893.77
4,094.40
4,299.12
38,496.83
40,421.67
42,442.75
44,564.89
46,793.13
49,132.79
51,589.43
- Associate Engineer 1851
18.51
19.43
20.41
21.43
22.50
23.62
24.80
3,208.07
3,368.47
3,536.90
3,713.74
3,899.43
4,094.40
4,299.12
38,496.83
40,421.67
42,442.75
44,564.89
46,793.13
49,132.79
51,589.43
Transportation 1851
18.51
19.43
20.41
21.43
22.50
23.62
24.80
Planner
3,208.07
3,368.47
3,536.90
3,713.74
3,899.43
4,094.40
4,299.12
38,496.83
40,421.67
42,442.75
44,564.89
46,793.13
49,132.79
51,589.43
Accounting Manager 1900
19.00
19.95
20.94
21.99
23.09
24.24
25.46
3,292.54
3,457.16
3,630.02
3,811.52
4,002.10
4,202.20
4,412.31
39,510.43
41,485.95
43,560.24
45,738.26
48,025.17
50,426.43
52,947.75
-17-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REVENUE DESCRIPTION
All revenues which, by law, do not have to be placed in a separate
fund are deposited in the General Fund. All general operations of
the City are charged to this fund. All expenditures must be made
pursuant to appropriations which lapse annually and at the end of
the fiscal year. Unexpended balances are transferred to the
unappropriated reserve.
PROPERTY TABES
Secured - Current Year
Tax levied on secured property pursuant to the revenue and
taxation code.
Unsecured - Current Year
Tax levied on all personal property not secured by real
property held in title by the same owner. Due to the
transitory nature of unsecured property, a tax is levied
immediately after assessed values are determined.
Prior Year uncollected
Taxes paid in the current year which were due in a prior year.
Interest and Penalties
Interest and penalties
property taxes.
OTHER TABES
charged for the late payment of
Sales and Use Tau
Of the 7% sales tax levied by the State of California, the
City receives 1% of the amount collected within the city
limits.
Transient Occupancy Tax
These revenues are received on a monthly basis from the hotels
in the City. The hotels are required to pay a 10% tax based
on the amount of their room rental revenues.
Franchise Fees
Companies are granted special privileges for the continued use
of public property, such as city streets. Such companies
usually involve elements of monopoly and may require regulation.
The Franchise Fees are the amounts required for the continued
granting of these privileges. Franchises currently granted
within the City are Electric, Gas, Cable TV, Bus Benches, and
Street Sweeping.
-20-
REVENUE
SUMMARY
-19-
FINES AND FORFEITURES
Vehicle Code Fines
Amounts derived from traffic citations and fines for
violations occurring within the city limits.
-- Court Fines and Forfeitures
Fines collected by the county courts for city code violations
other than traffic, which are shared with Los Angeles County.
Impound Fees
Fines collected upon the release of vehicles which have been
impounded/stored by the Sheriff's Department.
Miscellaneous
Other fines and forfeitures not included above.
LICENSES AND PERMITS
Building Fees
Building Fees are collected in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code. The revenues from these fees are used to cover the
cost of providing building inspections to insure compliance with
building codes.
CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
Planning and Engineering Fees
These fees are levied to cover costs of special plan checks,
inspections, etc. which maybe necessary in conjunction with
new construction or improvements being made by contractors.
Recreation Fees
These fees are collected by the City!s contracted recreation
department and City staff to cover the cost of providing
recreation pzpgrams such as fee classes, Tiny Tot programs,
excursions, and adult athletics.
-21-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21.48
22.55
23.68
SALARY RANGES BY
POSITION
27.41
28.78
FY 1993-94
3,722.85
3,908.99
4,104.44
4,309.66
- (3.5%)
4,751.41
4,988.98
44,674.21
_ JOB TITLE A B C
D
E
F
G
Senior Engineer 1990 19.90 20.89 21.94
23.03
24.18
25.39
26.66-
3,448.67 3,621.11 3,802.16
3,992.27
4,191.88
4,401.48
4,621.55
41,384.08 43,453.29 45,625.95
47,907.25
50,302.61
52,817.74
55,458.63
City Clerk 2065 20.65 21.68 22.77
23.91
25.10
26.36
27.68
3,579.66 3,758.65 3,946.58
4,143.91
4,351.11
4,568.66
4,797.09
42,955.98 45,103.78 47,358.97 49,726.92 52,213.26 54,823.92 57,565.12
Community Services 2148
21.48
22.55
23.68
24.86
26.11
27.41
28.78
Director
3,722.85
3,908.99
4,104.44
4,309.66
4,525.15
4,751.41
4,988.98
44,674.21
46,907.92
49,253.31
51,715.98
54,301.78
57,016.87
59,867.71
Comm. Development 2780
27.80
29.19
30.65
32.19
33.80
35.49
37.26
Director
4,819.36
5,060.33
5,313.34
5,579.01
5,857.96
6,150.86
6,458.40
57,832.29
60,723.90
63,760.10
66,948.10
70,295.51
73,810.29
77,500.80
City Eng/Public 2780
27.80
29.19
30.65
32.19
33.80
35.49
37.26
Works Director
4,819.36
5,060.33
5,313.34
5,579.01
5,857.96
6,150.86
6,458.40
57,832.29
60,723.90
63,760.10
66,948.10
70,295.51
73,810.29
77,500.80
Assistant City 2955
29.55
31.02
32.57
34.20
35.91
37.71
39.59
Manager
5,121.34
5,377.41
5,646.28
5,928.59
6,225.02
6,536.27
6,863.08
61,456.06
64,528.86
67,755.31
71,143.07
74,700.23
78,435.24
82,357.00
City Manager
7,660.00
91,920.00
PART-TIME/HOURLY
Comm. Svcs Leader
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
Intern/Part-17me
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
10.00
Parks Mtce Helper
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
10.00
Comm Svcs Coordinator
9.00
9.50
10.00
10.50
11.00
11.50
12.00
Counter Clerk/Permit Tech
12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
14.50
15.00
15.50
-18-
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
Motor vehicle In -Lieu Tax
The Motor Vehicle In -Lieu fee is equivalent to 20 of the
market value of motor vehicle fees imposed annually by the
state in lieu of local property tax.
Gas Tax Section 2106
Section 2106(a) of the Streets and Highways Code provides that
each city shall receive a fixed monthly apportionment of $400;
Section 2106(c) provides for distribution on a per capita
basis.
Gas Tax Section 2107
A sum equal to .00725 cents per gallon is distributed monthly
to the cities on a formula based per the Streets and Highways
Code, Section 2107; with calculation predicated on a per
capita apportionment - 8.98 x population.
Gas Tax Section 2107.5
This account represents a fixed amount of revenue received
from the state based on population.
Gas Tax Section 2105
This newly enacted Section of the Streets and Highways Code
provides for the collection and distribution of special gas
tax to fund improvements for regional transportation needs.
Prop A - Transit Tax
The City receives twenty-five percent of the 1/2% Prop A Sales
tax (approved by voters in 19.80) . These funds are distributed
by the L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA), and are distributed to Los Angeles County cities on a
proportional population basis. The funds are to be used for
the development of transit programs, within the guidelines
established by the MTA.
Prop C -.Transit Tax
The City receives twenty percent of the 1/2% Prop C sales tax
(approved by voters in 1990). These funds are distributed by
the L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA),
and are distributed to Los Angeles County cities on a
proportional population basis. The funds are to be used the
improving, expanding and maintaining public transit services.
These expenditures must be consistant with the County's
Congestion Management Program.
Prop A - Safe Parks Program
Funds transfered to the City as a result of the 1992 L.A.
County Safe Neighborhood Parks Act. These funds are to be
used to improve, preserve and restore parks.
-22-
STATE GRANTS
State TDA
The Transportation Development Act provides this source of
funding. Derived from statewide sales tax, and allocated by
formula to the County Transportation Commission, allocations
are deposited in each regional entity's State Transit
Assistance Fund.
SB821 - Bike and Pedestrian Paths
SB821 allows the City to request specifically allocated monies
for the purpose of constructing bike and pedestrian paths.
State Parks - Roberti-Z'Berg
The California State Legislature enacted the Roberti-Z'Berg
Urban Open Space and Recreation Program which provides funds
to certain political subdivisions for acquiring land and
developing facilities.
COUNTY GRANTS
County TDA
The Transportation Development Act provides this source of
funding. Derived from state sales tax and allocated by
formula to the County Local Transportation Fund, allocations
are available to operators for the support of public
transportation.systems.
Prop A - Transit Discretionary Funds
A 35% apportionment of the one-half cent sales tax distributed
to Los Angeles County Transportation Commission and is set
aside at their discretion; City's apportionment is based upon
meeting performance criteria established by the Commission.
FEDERAL GRANTS
Community.Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The federal government provides funds for metropolitan areas
whose population exceeds 50,000. The funds are based upon a
federal formula and are to be used only within low and
moderate. income census tracts and/or to benefit low and
moderate income persons.
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
_ Proceeds from Sale of General Fixed Assets
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets (used by governmental
funds only).
Damage to City Property
Reimbursement to City for repairing willful or accidental
damage to city property. Generally these are associated with
automobile accidents.
-23-
Proceeds from:
Bonds
Proceeds received by City after bond issue has met all
bond reserve and bond.costs have been paid.
Notes
Proceeds forma note form the lending sector.
OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
Operating Transfers In
Includes monies transferred from one fund to another.
Transfers are income to recipient fund.
USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Interest Earnings
Investments
Inactive City funds are pooled and invested on a
continuing basis in certain types of investments that are
state approved such as time certificate of deposits,
money market accounts, local agency investment fund, and
bankers' acceptances.
-24-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTIMATED RESOURCES
1994-95
GENERALFUND
Property Taxes
Other Taxes
State Subventions
Fines & Forfeitures
From Other Agencies
Current Svc Charges
Use of Money & Prop
Transfer -in Other Funds
Appropriated Fund Bal
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND
Intergovernmental Revenue
TRAFFIC SAFETY
Vehicle Fines
Use of Money & Prop
GAS TAX FUND
Highway Use Taxes
Use of Money & Prop
Appropriated Fund Bal
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Estimated Recommended Approved
$2,201,600
$2,711,000
2,825,000
3,090,000
2,533,500
2,457,700
60,500
79,000
503,000
Transit Subsidy Program
812,800
754,000
212,200
254,400
954,700
752,915
499,500
220,000
10,602,800
10,319,015 0
200,000
0
200,000 0
75,000
75,000
30,000
600
75,000
75,600
1,292,235
1,275,950
60,000
100,000
2,443,396
2,279,531
3,795,631
3,655,481 0
PROP A TRANSIT TAX FUND
Local Trans -Prop A
483,580
538,600
Appropriated Fund Bal
495,592
854,000
Transit Subsidy Program
50,000
Use of Money & Prop
18,000
15,000
_
997,172
1,457,600 0
PROP C TRANSIT TAX FUND
_ Local Trans -Prop C
670,000
438,150
Use of Money & Prop
30,000
Appropriated Fund Bal
913,429
1,508,429
1,583,429
1,976,579 0
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FUND
Waste Hauler Fees
75,000
81,000
Intergovt Revenues
22,427
Use of Money & Prop
800
500
Appropriated Fund Bal
19,760
39,105
95,560
143,032 0
AIR QUALITY IMP FUND
Pollution Reduc Fees
40,000
40,000
Use of Money & Prop
1,000
1,750
Appropriated Fund Bal
41,434
31,344
82,434
73,094 0.
-25-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTIMATED RESOURCES
1994-95
1993-94 City Manager Clty Council
Estimated Recommended Approved
PARK FEES FUND
Quimby Fees
100,000
93,000
Use of Money & Prop
6,000
7,000
Appropriated Fund Bal
188,187
195,687
'
294,187
295,687 0
PROP A - SAFE PARKS ACT
Park Grant Rev
2,040,000
2,020,000
Transfer -In Other Fds
2,040,000
2,020,000
CDBG FUND
762,841
762,841 0
CDBG Revenue
322,105
433,780
Appropriated Fund Bat
127,400
37,500
Trans -in Other Fds
322,105
433,780 0
LANDSCAPE DIST # 38
102,395
Benefit Assessment
256,500
260,745
Use of Money & Prop
2,000
4,000
Appropriated Fund Bal
173,645
242,467
Use of Money & Prop
432,145
507,212 0
LANDSCAPE DIST #39
Benefit Assessment 91,781
94,080
Use of Money & Prop 4,000
4,000
Appropriated Fund Bal 105,273
58,066
201,054
156,146 0
LANDSCAPE DIST #41
Benefit Assessment
121,154
124,141
Use of Money & Prop
2,800
3,000
Appropriated Fund Bal
133,764
113,480
'
257,718
240,621 0
GRAND AVE CONST FD
Appropriated Fund Bal
442,841
762,841
Transfer -In Other Fds
320,000
762,841
762,841 0
CAPITAL IMP PROJECT FD
Developer Fees
127,400
37,500
Trans -in Other Fds
4,758,002
5,375,535
Reserve-Traf Signls
102,395
4,885,402
5,515,430 0
SB 821 FUND
SB 821 Revenue
21,000
18,000
Use of Money & Prop
3,000
3,000
Appropriated Fund Bal
156,255
100,255
180,255
121,255 0
-26-
CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR
ESTIMATED RESOURCES
1994-95
SELF INSURANCE FUND
1993-94
Estimated
City Manager City Council
RecommendedApproved
Trans -in General Fund
Use of Money & Prop
190,000
263,416
Reserved Fund Bal
10,000
10,000
460,655
432,886
660,655
70-g-- 0
TOTAL RESOURCES
Less Interfund Transfers
27'268'388
28,659,675 0
NET CITY RESOURCES
(6'222'702)
(613911866)
$21,045,686
$22,267,809 $0
—27—
GENERAL FUND
BUDGET
-29-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
GENERAL FUND BUDGET
F.Y. 1994-95
ESTIMATED RESOURCES
Property Taxes
Other Taxes
State Subventions
Fines & Forfeitures
From Other Agencies
Current Svc Charge
Use of Money & Prop.
Transfer -in Other Funds
Reserved Fund Balance
Total Est. Revenue
APPROPRIATIONS
City Council
City Attorney
City Manager
City Clerk
Finance
General Government
Community Information
Planning
Building and Safety
Community Services
Law Enforcement
Fire
Animal Control
Emergency Prepardness
Public Wks/Engineering
Transfer -out Other Funds
Total Appropriations
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Recommended Approved
2,201,600
2,711,000
2,825,000
3,090,000
2,533,500
2,457,700
60,500
79,000
503,000
812,800
754,000
212,200
254,400
954,700
752,915
499,500
220,000
10,602,800
10,319,015 0
93,910
102,660
420,000
175,000
336,750
370,400
238,440
189,300
197,350
201,150
334,350
417,600
114,650
120,650
478,400
438,350
220,000
220,000
959,890
985,470
3,795,749
3,850,500
7,526
7,530
50,000
54,200
36,850
27,600
1,602,988
1,289,700
290,000
383,416 0
9,176,853
8,833,526
1,425,947
1,485,489 0
-31-
REVENUE
SUMMARY
-33-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUES
1994-95
Other Taxes:
3-94
EAm:d:ed:Estkmtg
City Manager�Ap�pr�
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy
2,000,000
Recommended
Property Taxes:
150,000
180,000
Current Secured
Current Unsecured
2,110,600
1,800,000
Supplemental Roil
91,000
91,000
Prior Year Property Taxes
2,825,000
30,000
Misc. Property Taxes
2,500,000
7 5
Interest, Pen. & Del.
7,000
1,000
15,000
Other Taxes:
2,201,600
2,711,000 0
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy
2,000,000
2,200,000
Franchise
150,000
180,000
Property Transfer
615,000
615,000
Mechanical Permits
60,000
95,000
Subventions -State:
2,825,000
3,090,000 0
Motor Veh-in Lieu
Mobile Home in -Lieu
2,500,000
2,430,000
Homeowners Exemption
7,000
6,000
Off Highway Tax
25,000
20,000
Plan Check Fee
1,500
1,700
Fines &Forfeitures:
2,533,500
2,457,700 0
General Fines
Parking Fines
10,000
13,000
Vehicle Impound Fees
30,000
50,000
False Alarm Fees
13,000
12,000
Narcotics Seizure Revenue
5,000
2,500
Graffiti Restitution
500
500
2,000
1,000
From Other Agencies:
60,500
79,000. o
Intergovt. Revenue
503,000
503,000
Current Svc. Charges:
Building Fees:
Bldg Permits
Plumbing Permits
117,300
120,000
Electrical Permits
11,800
12,000
Mechanical Permits
18
19,000
Grading Permits
,00
8,55 00
8,000.
Industrial Waste Fee
15,000
15,000
Permit Issuance Fee
8,000
3,000
Inspection Fees
19,500
20,000
Plan Check Fee
7,800
7,000
SMTP Fee
104,500
.100,000
600
2,000
-34-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUES
1994-95
Planning Fees:
Environmental Fees
Adv. Planning Fees
Current Planning Fees
Miscellaneous Permits
Engineering Fees:
Engr. Plan Check Fees
Engr. Review Fees
Engr. Permit Fees
Engr. Inspection Fees
Recreation Fees:
Community Activities
Athletics
Fee Programs
Contract Classes
Special Event Fees
Use of Money and Property:
Interest Earnings
Returned Check Charges
Rents & Concessions
Sale/Printed Material
Sale/Printed Material-Engr
Miscellaneous
Interfund Transfers
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
�Estlmate
City Manager City Council
[A�m�ded Recommended Approved
15,000 15,000
1,000 500
75,000 50,000
500
90,000
65,000
25,000
25,000
500
500
6,000
2,000
22,000
22,000
73,000
73,000
22,600
23,000
131,500
131,500
40,000
40,000
0
812,800
754,000
200,000
240,000
200
200
5,500
7,000
5,000
5,700
1,500
1,500
212,200
254,400 0
954,700 752,915
10,103,300 10,099,015 0
-35-
EXPENDITURE DETAIL
BY
DEPARTMENT
-37-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Legislative
City Council
City Attorney
City Manager
City Clerk
-39-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Legislative
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4010-4040
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
$525,460
$570,860
$0
SUPPLIES
6,250
6,400
0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
84,350
36,900
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
472,640
223,200
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
400
0
0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$1,089,100
$837,360
$0
—40—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 'DEPARTMENT: Legislative
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4010-4040
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part time
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Benefits
0083
Worker's Comp Exp.
0085
Medicare
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
0
TOTALPERSONNELSVCS
SUPPLIES
- 1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
1300
Small Tools & Equip
$0
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2125
Telephone
2130
Rental/Lease-Equip.
2200
Equipment Maint.
2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
- 2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
2390
Elections
1,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000
Professional Svcs
4020
Legal Services
4021
Special Legal Svcs
4023
Self Ins. Defense
-
TOTAL PROF SVCS ,
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6.230
Computer Equipment
6240
Communication Equipment
7,050
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
362,100
401,450
0
0
0
0
31,300
19,800
0
6,400
6,600
0
57,000
56,250
0
7,050
8,410
0
7,860
7,400
0
53,750
70,950
0
$525,460
$570,860
$0
3,100
0
0
2,100
5,300
0
1,050
1,100
0
$6,250
$6,400
$0
1,000
1,000
0
3,200
4,200
0
100
100
0
1,800
2,350
0
200
200
0
650
750
0
1,000
1,000
0
1,450
1,650
0
1,100
900
0
7,150
6,650
0
13,000
13,500
0
900
1,000
0
3,300
3,600
0
49,500
0
0
$84,350
$36,900
$0
52,640
48,200
0
75,000
75,000
0
345,000
100,000
0
0
0
0
$472,640
$223,200
$0
0
0
0
400
0
0
$400
$0
$0
$1,089,100 $837,360 $0
-41-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY _
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE• CITY COUNCIL DIVISION NO. 4010
The City Council is the legislative and policy-making body for the
City of Diamond Bar. Five councilmembers are elected at -large for
four-year, overlapping terms of office. The Council annually
elects one of its members to serve as Mayor. The Mayor presides
over all Council meetings and is the ceremonial head of the City
for official functions.
As Diamond Bar's elected representatives, the City Council
expresses the values of the electorate in keeping pace with viable
community needs and for establishing the quality of municipal _
services in the urban environment. The Council determines service
levels and revenue obligations through the adoption of an annual
budget; authorizes City contracts and expenditures; establishes
City service and operating policies; and adopts such regulatory
measures as may be necessary for the mutual protection of the
community.
Councilmembers also represent the City on various intergovernmental
organizations to achieve governmental cooperation, legislation, and
programs that are consistent with the needs of the community.
PERSONNEL
City Council Members 5.0
-42-
CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR
DEPARTMENT:
Legislative
- ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
DIVISION:
City Council
1994-95
ACCOUNT*
4010
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010 Salaries
30,000
30,000
0070 City Paid Benefits
2,850
2,700
0080 Retirement
4,750
4,200
0083 Workers Comp. Exp.
300
360
0085 Medicare
610
450
0090 Cafeteria Benefits
13,700
23,250
_ TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
$52,210
$60,960
$0
SUPPLIES
1100 Office Supplies
500
1200 Operating Supplies
500
1,000
TOTAL SUPPLIES
$1,000
$1,000
$0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110 Printing
500
500
2315 Membership & Dues
100
100
2320 Publications
400
400
2325 Meetings
4,000
4,000
2330 Travel-Conf & Mtgs
8,000
8,000
2340 Education & Training
2,500
2,500
2395 Misc. Expenditures
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
$15,500
$15,500
$0
PROFESSI,01NAL SERVICES
4000 Professional Svcs
25,200
25,200
TOTAL PROF. SERVICES
$25,200
$25,200
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$93,910
$102,660
$0
—43—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: CITY ATTORNEY DIVISION NO. 4020
The City Attorney acts as the City's legal counsel, prepares
resolutions, ordinances and agreements; and advises the City
Council and staff on all legal matters relating to the operation of
the municipal government. This service is provided on an interim
basis through a contract with the law offices of Michael B.
Montgomery. The City pays a monthly retainer fee which covers
attendance at meetings and general consulting services.
Special legal services required in addition to the contract are
also included within this division.
PERSONNEL
Total Positions 0.00
-44-
CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR
DEPARTMENT:
Legislative
-- ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
DIVISION:
City Attorney
1994-95
ACCOUNT #:
4020
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4020 Legal Services
75,000
75,000
4021 Special Legal Svcs
345,000
100,000
4023 Self Ins. Defense
— TOTAL PROF. SVCS..
420,000
175,000
0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$420,000
$175,000
$0
—45—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: CITY MANAGER DIVISION NO. 4030
THe City Manager's Office budget provides for continued
administrative direction to all operating departments in compliance
with the City's Municipal Code. This department is responsible for
the execution of Council policy and the enforcement of all laws and
ordinances.
The City Manager, in concert with the City Council, establishes
policy, provides leadership and implements efficient and effective
services. The City Manager is the director of all City personnel.
As such, he establishes and maintains appropriate controls to
ensure that all operating departments adhere to Council and legally
mandated policies and regulations. Additionally he is responsible
for the preparation and administration of the annual budget.
Administrative and clerical support to the City Council members is
also provided through the City Manager's office.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
City Manager
1.000
Asst. City Manager
.975
Asst. to City Manager
.250
Executive Secretary
.750
Typist
.650
.Clerk
Admin. Assistant
.700
Sub -Total
4.325
PART TIME POSITIONS
Admin. Intern 2.000
Sub -Total 2.000
Total Positions
fl
-46-
6.325
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1994-95
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part time
- 0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Worker's Comp Exp
0085
Medicare /Social Security
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
TOTALPERSONNELSVCS
- SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
- 1300
Small Tools & Equip
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
-- 2125
Telephone
2130
Equipment Rent
2200
Equipment Maint.
2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
1,200
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000 Professional Svcs
TOTAL PROF. SVCS.
CAPITAL OUTLAY
-- 6240 Communications Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT: Legislative
DIVISION: City Manager
ACCOUNT #: 4030
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
214,950 254,300
31,300
19,800
1,850
2,300
33,800
35,650
5,600
6,650
5,550
5,250
22,800
30,450
$315,850
$354,400
$0
500
800
1,300
600
600
$1,900
$1,900
$0
500
500
200
200
100
100
1,500
2,000
200
200
500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,200
600
400
3,000
2,500
4,000
4,500
500
500
500
500
$13,600
$14,100
$0
5,000
0
0
$5,000
$0
$0
$400
$0
$0
$400
$0
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $336,750 $370,400 $0
-47-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY -
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: CITY CLERK DIVISION NO. 4040
The City Clerk has a statutory duty to record the official minutes
of all City Council meetings; maintain original resolutions and
ordinances, and is the custodian of the City seal. Additionally,
she is the chief election officer for municipal elections. The
City Clerk's office is the depository for all official documents
and records. The Clerk assists and supports the public and City
departments by making available the records necessary for the City
to advance its administrative, legal and legislative functions.
The City Clerk encourages the use of cost-saving/productivity
improving records management techniques throughout the City. The
City Clerk prepares all necessary documents for public hearings,
posts notices and copies of ordinances as required by law and
maintains and updates the Municipal Code.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
City Clerk 1.00
Deputy City Clerk 1.00
Clerk Typist 1.00
Total Positions 3.00
-48-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Legislative
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES iDIVISION': City Clerk
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4040
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part Time
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Worker's Comp. Exp.
0085
Medicare/Social Security
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
500
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
1300
Small Tools & Equip
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2125
Telephone
2200
Equipment Maint.
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
- 2390
Elections
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
PROFESSIONAL
SVC
4000
Professional Svcs
TOTAL PROF. SVCS
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
117,150 117,150
1,700
1,600
18,450
16,400
1,150
1,400
1,700
1,700
17,250
17,250
$157,400
$155,500 $0
2,100
1,000
800
3,000
450
500
$3,350
$3,500 $0
3,000
4,000
300
350
150
250
350
350
100
100
150
150
1,000
1,000
400
500
300
600
49,500
0
$55,250
$7,300 $0
22,440
23,000
$22,440
$23,000
- DEPARTMENT TOTAL $238,440 $189,300 $0
-49-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - General Government
♦ Finance
♦ General Government
♦ Community Relations
-51-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: General Govt.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
VISION:
Summary
—
1994-95
ZCOUNT#:
4050-95
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
$163,500
$214,200
$0
SUPPLIES
25,000
28,200
0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
352,600
356,600
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
96,100
90,600
0
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
0
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
9,150
49,800
0
ALLOCATED COSTS
0
0
0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$646,350
$739,400
$0 -
—52—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: General Govt. j
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4050-95
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part time
- 0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Benefits
0083
Worker's Comp Exp.
0085
Medicare
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
0093
Benefits Administration
2,400
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
SUPPLIES
22,200
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
1300
Small Tools & Equip
$0
TOTAL SUPPLIES
_ OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2100
Photocopy
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2125
Telephone
2126
Utilities
2128
Banking Charges
2130
Rental/Lease-Equip.
2140
Rent/Lease-Real Prop
- 2200
Equipment Maint.
2205
Comouter Maint
2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg
-- 2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
2345
Employment Physicals
2350
Newsletter
2352
Promotional Items
2353
Anniversary
2355
Contr-Community Grps
2360
Graffiti Reward Program
2395
Misc. Expenditures
7200
Insurance Expense
7225
Insurance Retention
3,650
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
122,450
161,900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,600
2,050
0
19,250
22,700
0
1,200
1,950
0
1,800
2,400
0
16,200
22,200
0
1,000
1,000
0
$163,500
$214,200
$0
500
0
0
24,000
27,700
0
500
500
0
$25,000
$28,200
$0
5,000
6,500
0
8,900
22,500
0
1,000
1,000
0
22,500
25,500
0
24,000
28,000
0
100
100
0
500
500
0
17,000
24,200
0
150,000
155,000
0
6,000
14,000
0
5,000
8,000
0
13,500
18,000
0
500
700
0
26,950
27,000
0
1,300
1,550
0
2,150
3,650
0
750
1,000
0
200
200
0
1,500
1,700
0
1,000
1,000
0
50,000
0
0
0
1,500
0
1,500
1,500
0
7,500
7,500
0
5,000
5,000
0
750
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$352,600
$356,600
$0
-53-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR D' EPARTMENT: General Govt.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ZCOUNT#:
VISION: Summary
1994-95 4050-
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000
Professional Svcs
4010
Auditing Services
4020
Legal
4030
Data Processing Svcs
4260
Economic Development
6240
TOTAL PROF SVCS
CONTRACT SERVICES
5000 Contract Services
5300 Contr Svcs -Com. Svcs
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6100
Auto Equipment
6200
Office Equipment
6220
Office Furniture
6230
Computer Equipment - Hardware
6235
Computer Equipment - Software
6240
Communications Equipment
6250
Misc. Equipment
6310
Bldg Improvements
$0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
ALLOCATL"D COSTS
9980 Less Allocated Costs
TOTAL ALLOC COSTS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
51,540
48,000
0
3,600
18,600
0
1,100
0
0
14,860
14,000
0
25,000
10,000
0
$96,100
$90,600
$0
0
0
0
0
0
0 _
$0
$0
$0
0
12,000
0
0
4,500
0
3,000
1,000
0
5,100
12,500
0
0
5,000
0
0
9,800
0
1,050
5,000
0
0
0
0
$9,150
$49,800
$0
—54—
0 0 0
$646,350 $739,400 $0
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
-55-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: FINANCE DIVISION NO. 4050
The Finance Division provides accounting control over assets,
revenues, receivables and maintains budgetary control over all City
funds. This department is responsible for the proper receipt,
custody and disbursement of all City funds.
The Finance Division processes all financial transactions of the
City. Specific activities include accounts payable, cash receipts,
payroll, fixed assets, budget maintenance, audits, financial
reporting, and the refinements and mantenance of the general
accounting system.
The Finance Division is also responsible for the safety, liquidity
and maximization of the yields of the City's financial resources.
In conjunction with the payroll function, the Finance Division is
responsible for the administration of the personnel function. This
includes benefit administration, personnel review and salary
adjustments.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
Accounting Manager 1.00
Senior Accountant 1.00 --
Subtotal 2.00
PERMANENT PART TIME POSITIONS
Account Clerk I .75
Total Positions 2.75
-56-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I DEPARTMENT: General Govt.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Finance
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4050
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part time
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Wkr's Comp.
0085
Medicare
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
2325
TOTALPERSONNELSVCS
SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Departmental Supplies
1300
Small Tools & Equip
1,800
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2200
Equipment Maint.
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
15,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000 Professional Services
4010 Auditing Services
4030 Data Processing Svcs.
TOTAL PROF SVCS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6230 Computer Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
122,450 122,450
1,600
1,500
19,250
17,150
1,200
1,450
1,800
1,800
16,200
16,200
$162,500
$160,550 $0
500
500 1,200
1,000 $1,200 $0
1,500 1,500
450
500
300
350
150
150
750
1,000
200
200
500
700
$3,850
$4,400
$0
6,000
15,540
15,000
13,860
14,000
$29,400
$35,000
$0
600
$600
$0
$0
$197,350
$201,150
$0
-57-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION NO. 4090
This division provides funds for the operating, rental and general
operation of City Hall. Included in this are items which cannot be
specifically identified as one division's expenditure, such as
utilities, duplicating, postage, etc. This division provides for
the purchase of general office furniture and equipment.
PERSONNEL
Total positions 0.00
-58-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: General Govt.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES (DIVISION: General Govt.
1994-95 ,ACCOUNT #: 4090
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0083 Worker's Comp. Exp.
0093 Benefits Administration
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
_ SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
1300
Small Tools & Equip
Prof Svcs -Data Proc
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
-- 2100
Photocopy
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2125
Telephone
2126
Utilities
2128
Banking Charges
2130
Rental/Lease-Equip.
2140
Rent/Lease-Real Prop
2200
Equipment Maint.
_ 2205
Computer Maint
2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg
2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2340
Education & Training
2345
Employment Physicals
2395
Misc. Expenditures
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000
Professional Svcs
- 4010
Prof Svcs -Auditing
4020
Prof Svcs - Legal
4030
Prof Svcs -Data Proc
_
TOTAL PROF SVCS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6100
Auto Equipment
6200
Office Equipment
6220
Office Furniture
6230
Computer Equipment -Hardware
_ 6235
Computer Equipment -Software
6240
Communications Equipment
6250
Misc. Equipment
1,000
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
1,000
1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$0
0
10,500
9,500
500
500
$11,000
$10,000
$0
5,000
6,500
5,000
6,000
1,000
1,000
16,000
18,500
24,000
28,000
100
100
500
500
14,000
21,200
150,000
155,000
6,000
14,000
5,000
8,000
13,500
18,000
500
700
26,500
26,500
1,000
1,200
2,000
3,500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
$272,100
$311,200
$0
36,000
42,000
3,600
3,600
1,100
1,000
$41,700
$45,600
$0
12,000
4,500
3,000
1,000
4,500
12,500
5,000
9,800
1,050
5,000
$8,550
$49,800
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $334,350 $417,600 $0
-59-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: COMMUNITY RELATIONS DIVISION NO. 4095
This division is to provide for the general advancement of the City
of Diamond Bar. Included in this budget are funds for the creation
and the publication of the City newsletter. Various community
awards, certificates, and recognition plaques will be funded
through this department. Also the City will be providing support
to the local business community through various economic
development programs.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME PERSONNEL
Community Relations officer 1.00
Total Positions 1.00
-60-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: General Govt.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Com. Relations
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4095
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080.
Retirement
0083
Worker's Comp Exp.
0085
Medicare
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2120
Postage
2130
Rental/Lease of Equipment
2350
Newsletter
2352
Promotional Items
2353
Anniversary
2355
Contr Community Grps
- 2360
Graffiti Reward Program
2395
Misc. Expenditures
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SVCS
4260
Economic Development
TOTAL PROF SVCS
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
39,450
550
5,550
500
600
6,000 _
$0 $52,650 $0
13,000 17,000
$13,000 $17,000
2,400 15,000
6,500 7,000
3,000 3,000
50,000
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $114,650 $120,650 $0
-61-
1,500
1,500
1,500
7,500
7,500
5,000
5,000
750
500
$76,650
$41,000 $0
25,000
10,000
$25,000
$10,000 $0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $114,650 $120,650 $0
-61-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Community Development
♦ Planning
♦ Building 8 Safety
-63-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (DEPARTMENT:
Community Dev. i
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
DIVISION:
Summary
1994-95
(ACCOUNT
#:
4210-4220
1993-94
City Manager
City Council -
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
323,600
325,600
0 _
0
SUPPLIES
3,050
16,050
3,050
12,500
0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
88,200
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
131,200
0
CONTRACT SERVICES
220,000
226,000
$655,350
$0
DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL
$693,900
—64—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Dev.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES I DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4210-4220
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
3,000
$5,000
$3,000
0010
Salaries
227,400
231,300
0020
Overtime
4,000
1,500
0030
Wages - Part time
17,250
19,800
0070
City Paid Benefits
2,800
2,650
0080
Retirement
35,850
32,400
0083
Worker's Comp Exp.
3,950
4,150
0085
Medicare
4,100
4,900
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
28,250
28,900
-
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
$323,600
$325,600
$0
SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1,500
1200
Operating Supplies
1,500
3,000
1300
Small Tools & Equip
50
50
TOTAL SUPPLIES
$3,050
$3,050
$0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2100
Photocopying
500
2110
Printing
2,000
1,000
2115
Advertising
5,000
2,000
2120
Postage
200
200
2130
Equipment Rent
1,000
900
- 2200
Equipment Maint.
700
750
2310
Fuel
700
700
2315
Membership & Dues
1,000
1,000
- 2320
Publications
450
450
2325
Meetings
500
500
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
3,000
3,000
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
500
1,000
_
2340
Education & Training
500
1,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
$16,050
$12,500
$0
- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000
Professional Svcs
10,000
10,000
4100
Commissioner Comp.
7,200
7,200
4110
Com. Comp-SEATAC
1,000
1,000
4210
Planning -Regional
0
10,000
4220
General Plan
68,000
35,000
4240
Environmental Svcs
45,000
25,000
TOTAL PROF SVCS
$131,200
$88,200
$0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5201
Contr Svcs -13 & S
220,000
220,000
_
5211
Contr Svcs -Code Enforcement
6,000
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
$220,000
$226,000
$0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6220 Office Furniture
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
5,000
3,000
$5,000
$3,000
$698,900
$658,350 $0
-65-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION NO. 4210
The Department of Community Development is responsible for the
functions related to current and advanced planning, building &
safety, code enforcement, and economic development. It consists of
two operating divisions.
The Planning Division provides the community with long and short
term planning in order to coordinate and monitor growth and
development. It is charged with the development and implementation
responsibilities of the General Plan. It prepares and administers
the zoning and subdivision ordinances and reviews development
projects for compliance with various development ordinances. The
Planning Division insures that all projects receive the required
environmental review in compliance with CEQA. Further, it provides
technical support to the City Council and the various planning
related committees/commissions.
The Planning Division is also responsible for the development and
administration of economic development. It updates and maintains
records for the general public and coordinates projects and
programs with other governmental agencies.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
Community Development Director .975
Associate Planner 1.000
Assistant Planner 1.000
Code Enforcement Officer 1.000
Admin. Secretary 1.000
Subtotal 4.975
PART TIME POSITIONS
Planning Intern 2.000
Total Positions 6.975
-66-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Dev,
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Planning
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4210
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part time
- 0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Worker's Comp. Exp.
0085
Medicare/Social Security
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
TOTALPERSONNELSVCS
SUPPLIES
1100
Office Supplies
1200
Operating Supplies
- 1300
Small Tools & Equip
$0
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2100
Photocopying
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2130
Equipment Rent
2200
Equipment Maint.
2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
- 2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage & Auto Allow
2340
Education & Training
--
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
_ 4000
Professional Svcs
4100
Commissioner Comp.
4110
Com. Comp - SEATAC
4210
Planning
_- 4220
General Plan
4240
Environmental
35,850
TOTAL PROF SVCS
227,400
231,300
4,000
1,500
17,250
19,800
2,800
2,650
35,850
32,400
3,950
4,150
4,100
4,900
28,250
28,900
$323,600
$325,600
$0
1,500
1,500
3,000
50
50
$3,050
$3,050
$0
500
2,000
1,000
5,000
2,000
200
200
1,000
900
700
750
700
700
1,000
1,000
450
450
500
500
3,000
3,000
500
1,000
500
1,000
$15,550
$12,500
$0
10,000
10,000
7,200
7,200
1,000
1,000
0
10,000
68,000
35,000
45,000
25,000
$131,200
$88,200
$0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5211 Cont Svcs - Code Enf Prosecution 6,000
$0 $6,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6220 Office Furniture
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
5,000 3,000
$5,000 $3,000
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $478,400 $438,350 $0
-67-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TIT BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION NO. 4220
The Building and Safety Division is responsible for the protection
of public health and safety through the enforcement of the Building
Code and other related codes. This division provides for Building
and Safety plan check, permit issuance, and inspection services.
These services are currently being provided under contract with
D & J Engineering.
PERSONNEL
Total Positions 0.00
-68-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR [ACCOUNT#:
EPARTMENT: Community Dev.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES VISION: Bldg & Safety
1994-95 4220
CONTRACT SERVICES
5201 Bldg & Safety
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
—69—
220,000 220,000
$220,000 $220,000
$220,000 $220,000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Community Services
♦ Park Administration
♦ City Parks
Paul C. Grow Park
Heritage Park
Maple Hill Park
Peterson Park
Ronald Reagan Park
Starshine Park
Summitridge Park
Sycamore Canyon Park
♦ Recreation
_71_
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DEPARTMENT TITLE: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT NO. 4310-4350
The Community Services Department is responsible for the
maintenance and operation of the City's eight parks. This includes
grounds maintenance, facility upkeep, park improvements and capital
projects. This fiscal year it is anticipated that the Pantera Park
site will be designed and developed.
The Department also administers the City's community recreation
program, a portion of which is provided through contracted services
with the City of Brea. In addition to the contracted services, the
Diamond Bar City staff currently conducts the Tiny Tots program,
adult excursions, and the popular Concert in the Park series.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
Community Services Director
Supt of Parks & Maint
Maintenance Worker II
Admin Assistant
Sub total
PART TIME POSITIONS'
Community Services Leader
Parks Maintenance Helper
Sub total
Total Positions
-72-
.80
.80
.80
1.00
3P['h:
2.00
3.00
5.00
8.40
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4310-4350
PERSONNEL SERVICES
SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
220,160
224,950
0
28,300
39,000
0
207,400
229,810
0
13,800
4,800
0
528,250
464,510
0
5,650
22,400
0
$1,003,560
$985,470
$0
—73—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
'I
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
DIVISION: Summary
1994-95
ACCOUNT #: 4310-4350
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0
0010 Salaries
141,300
129,150
0
0020 Overtime
500
2 8,400
500
43,200
0
0030 Wages -Part Time
2,300
1,750
0
0070 City Paid Benefits
21,150
20,900
0
0080 Benefits
0083 Worker's Comp. Exp.
5,250
6,250
0
0085 Medicare
4,150
4,000
0
0
0090 Cafeteria Benefits
17,110
19,200
$0
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVC
$220,160
$224,950
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
28,300
39,000
0
0
1300 Small Tools & Equip
0
0
$0
$28,300
$39,000
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
0
2110 Printing
500
100
0
100
0
2115 Advertising
0
0
2120 Postage
400
4,900
7,180
0
2125 Telephone
86,050
101,830
0
2126 Utilities
500
500
0
2130 Equipment Rent
2140 Rent/Lease-Real Prop
70,000
70,000
0
2200 Equipment Maint.
4,500
3,000
0
0
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
34,100
39,850
0
2310 Fuel
2,800
2,800
0
2315 Membership & Dues
300
350
0
2320 Publications
100
2,050
100
2,050
0
2325 M stings
2330 Travel -Cont &Meetings
700
1,600
0
2335 Mileage
0
400
50
400
0
0
2340 Education & Training
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
$207,400
$229,810
$0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0
4100 Commissioner Comp
4,800
4,800
0
4300 Professional Svcs
TOTAL PROF SVCS
9,000
0
$13,800
$4,800
$0
CONTRACT SERVICES
0
5300 Contract Services
498,950
435,110
0
5305 Concerts in the Park
10,400
10,500
0
5310 Excursions
18,900
18,900
$0
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
$528,250
$464,510
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0
3,000
0
6100 Auto Equipment
0
1,000
0
6200 Office Equipment
0
4,000
0
6230 Computer Equipment
0
6250 Misc. Equipment
5,650
9,400
5,000
0
6410 Captial Improvements
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
0
$5,650
$22,400
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $1,003,560 $985,470 $0
-74-
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1994-95
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0020
Overtime
0030
Wages - Part Time
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Wkr's Comp. Exp.
0085
Medicare / Social Security
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
2320
TOTAL PERSONAL SVCS
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
1300 Small Tools & Equip
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2130
Equipment Rent
2200
Equipment Maint.
2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg
2310
Fuel
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs
2335
Mileage
2340
Education & Training
$12,550
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
4300
Prof. Services
TOTAL PROF SVC
- CAPITAL OUTLAY
6100
Auto Equipment
6200
Office Equipment
6230
Computer Equipment
6250
Misc. Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
(DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
(DIVISION: Park Admin.
ACCOUNT #: 4310
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
63,950 64,400
7,900
1,150
850
9,100
9,050
3,250
3,200
1,450
950
10,300
9,300
$97,100
$87,750 $0
6,800 7,000
$6,800 $7,000 $0
0
100
100
50
500
500
2,000
3,000
2,000
3,400
2,800
2,800
300
350
100
100
250
250
700
1,600
50
400
400
,9,200
$12,550
$0
3,000
1,000
4,000
3,400 _
$0 $11,400 $0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $113,100 $118,700 $0
-75-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ZCOUNT#:
ISION: Grow Park
1994-95 4311
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
720
2126 Utilities
10,200
11,730
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
2,500
3,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$12,700
$15,450 $0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
13,750
13,850
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
$13,750
$13,850
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6250 Misc Equipment
1,000
$p
$1,000
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$26,450
$30,300 $0
—76—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Heritage Park
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4313
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Approved Budget Recommended Approved
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
2,800
2,800
2126 Utilities
9,400
10,800
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
4,300
5,250
$18,850 $0
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$16,500
CONTRACT SERVICES
12,000
9,500
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
$12,000
$9,500 $0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
4,150
$3,000
6250 Misc. Capital Equipment
$4,150
$3,000
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $32,650 $31,350 $0
—77—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1994-95
DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
DIVISION: Maplehill Park
ACCOUNT* 4316
—78—
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
TOTAL SUPPLIES
$0
$0
$0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
720
2126 Utilities
11,500
13,225
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
4,000
4,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$15,500
$17,945
$0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
12,000
11,340
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
$12,000
$11,340
$0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6410 Capital improvements
3,000
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
$0
$3,000
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$27,500
$32,285
$0
—78—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR [ACCOUNT#:
ARTMENT: Community Svcs
_ ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
1994-95 ISION: Peterson Park
4319 �
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
2126 Utilities
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
- CAPITAL OUTLAY
6410 Capital Improvements
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
—79—
720
15,500 15,500
4,200 4,200
$19,700 $20,420 $0
22,000 15,120
$22,000 $15,120 $0
1,000
$0 $1,000
$41,700 $36,540 $0
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Reagan Park
1994-95 ACCOUNT #c 4322
1993-94 City Manager City Council
SUPPLIES Amended Budget Recommended Approved
1200 Operating Supplies
1300 Small Tools & Equip
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
2126 Utilities
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6410 Capital Improvement
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
0
0 0
720
10,800
14,375
2,100
2,500
$12,900
$17,595 $0
13,100
13,100
$13,100
$13,100 $0
1,000
—80—
0 1,000
$26,000 $31,695 $0
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Starshine Park
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4325
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2126 Utilities
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
4,300 5,900
1,000 1,000
$5,300 $6,900 $0
5,700 6,300
$5,700 $6,300 $0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $11,000 $13,200
—81—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ;DEP' ARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURESDIVISION:
Summitridge Pk
-
1994-95
ACCOUNT #:
4328
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2126 Utilities
16,350
21,100
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
7,000
4,000
$0
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$23,350
$25,100
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
20,400
18,900
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
$20,400
$18,900
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$0
$43,750
$44,000
—82—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
— ESTIMA'T'ED EXPENDITURES
DEPARTMENT:
Community Svcs
1994-95
DIVISION:
Sycamore Park
jACCOUNT #:
4331
J
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2125 Telephone
2126 Utilities
2,100
1,500
2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
$,000
9,200
TOTAL OPERATING EXP9,500
12,500
$19,600
$23,200
$0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
30,000
40,000
$301000
$40,000
$0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6250 Misc. Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
2,000
-
$0
$2,000
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$49,600
$65,200
$0
—83—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR !DEPARTMENT: Community Svcs
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Recreation -
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4350
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Postage
350
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
2325
-
0010
Salaries
77,350
64,750
0020
Overtime
500
500
0030
Wages -Part Time
20,500
43,200
0070
City Paid Benefits
1,150
900
0080
Retirement .
12,050
11,850
0083
Worker's Comp. Exp.
2,000
3,050
0085
Medicare
2,700
3,050
0090
Cafeteria Benefits
11,900
9,900
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVC
$128,150
$137,200 $0
SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1200
Operating Supplies
21,500
32,000
1300
Small Tools & Equip
TOTAL SUPPLIES
$21,500
$32,000 $0 --
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
500 _
2120
Postage
350
2140
Rent/Lease of Prop.
70,000 70,000
2325
Meetings
1,800 1,800
TOTAL PROF SVCS
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$72,650 $71,800 $0 -
PROFESSIONAL SVCS
4000 PrL Assional Services
4,000
-
4100 Commissioner Comp
4,800
4,800
4300 Prof Svcs -Com Svcs
5,000
TOTAL PROF SVCS
$13,800
$4,800
$0 -
CONTRACT SERVICES
5300 Com. Svcs. contract
300,000
307,000
5305 Concerts in the Park
10,400
10,500
5310 Prop A Excursions
18,900
18,900
TOTAL CONTRACT SVC
$329,300
$336,400
$0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6250 Misc. Equipment
1,500
$1,500
$0
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$0
$566,900
$582,200
-84-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Public Safety
♦ Law Enforcement
♦ Fire
♦ Animal Control
♦ Emergency Preparedness
-85-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
=DIVISION:Summarnyfety
i
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
-4440
1994-95
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved
SUPPLIES
2,900
25 549
5,000
27,600
0
0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
0
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17,500
3,834,526
3,886,730
0
CONTRACT SERVICES
9,650
20,500
0
CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$3,890,125
$3,939,830
$0
-86-
I
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Public Safety
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Summary
1994-95 ACCOUNT * 4411-4440
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
TOTAL SUPPLIES
- OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2120
Postage
2125
Telephone
2126
Utilties
2130
Equipment Rent
2200
Equipment Maint.
- 2315
Membership & Dues
2325
Meetings
2340
Education & Training
Communications Eq
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4040 Emergency Co-ord
TOTAL PROF SVCS
CONTRACT SERVICES
5401
Cony Svcs -Sheriff
5402
Contr Svcs -Fire
5403
Contr Svcs -An Contrl
5404
Contr Svcs - Sheriff Sp Evts
5405
Parking Citation Admin
5531
CS - Crossing Guards
1,000
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6100
Vehicle Equip
6240
Communications Eq
6230
Computer Equipment
6250
Misc Equipment
6310
Bldg Improvements
0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
A
Amended Budget Recommended pPoved
2,900 5,000
2.900 5,000
2,100
0
0
0
1,500
0
1,000
1,000
0
200
100
0
0
1,000
0
18,249
19,780
0
3,000
3,000
0
500
720
0
500
500
0
$25,549
$27,600
$0
17,500
0
0
$17,500
$0
$0
3,672,000
3,715,000
0
7,526
7,530
0
50,000
54,200
0
40,000
40,000
0
5,000
5,000
0
60,000
65,000
0
$3,834,526
$3,886,730
$0
9,000
4,500
0
0
0
0
0
2,500
0
650
5,000
0
0
8,500
0
$9,650
$20,500
$0
$3,890,125
$3,939,830
$0
-87-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION NO. 4411
The City of Diamond Bar contracts with the Los Angeles County
Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services. These services
include general law enforcement and traffic safety.
General law enforcement provides an assortment of officers to
provide crime prevention via around-the-clock street patrols,
narcotics prevention, special investigations and the general
enforcement of laws. Additionally, the law enforcement budget
includes funds for various special events including the Ranch
Festival, Concerts in the Park, City Anniversary Celebration and
the YMCA 5-10K Walk/Run.
Traffic safety provides routine traffic patrol as a means of
encouraging motorists and pedestrians to comply with traffic laws
and ordinances and, when necessary, issue citations and/or warnings
for violations. Traffic accidents are investigated and their
circumstances recorded and analyzed.
The City has received requests for supplimental law enforcement
equipment. This Fiscal Year, the City has budgeted $5,000 for the
purpose of purchasing two breath-a-lyzers, two radar units and two
roll -a -tapes.
This division also includes contract services for crossing guards
and the administration of the City's parking citations. With the
passage of AB408, Cities are now required to issue and collect
their own parking citations. The City is currently under contract
with Judicial Data systems for the administration of parking
citations.
The following is a breakdown of the proposed contracted sheriff's
service levels:
TYPE OF SERVICE
NUMBER
General Law Units:
One -Man 40 -hour (Team Leader)
1
One -Man 56 -hour
6
Two-man 40 -hour
1
Traffic Law Units:
One-man 56 -hour
4
Motorcycle 40 -hour
3
Community Service Officer w/vehicle
2
Crime Prevention Deputy
1
Narcotics Deputy
1
Asian Task Force Deputy
0.5
Helicopter Patrol 4 hours per month
-88-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 'DEPARTMENT: Public Safety
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Law Enforcement
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4411
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2130 Equipment Rent
2200 Equipment Maint. 18,249 19,780
2325 Meetings 500 720
TOTAL OPERATING EXP. $18,749 $20,500 $0
CONTRACT SERVICES
5401 Contr Svcs -Sheriff
5404 Contr Svcs -Sheriff Sp Events
5405 Parking Citation Administration
5531 CS -Crossing Guards
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6250 Miscellaneous Equipment
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3,672,000
3,715,000
40,000
40,000
5,000
5,000
60,000
65,000
$3,777,000
$3,825,000 $0
5,000
$0
$5,000 $0
$3,795,749
$3,850,500 $0
—89—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: FIRE DIVISION NO. 4421
The City, upon incorporation, became responsible for fire -
protection within the City boundaries. Therefore the City assumed
wildland fire protection. This has required additional resources
to be used by the Consolidated Fire Protection District. It is a
responsibility of the City to pay annually for these added costs.
-90-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Public Safety
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION:. Fire
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4421
1993-94 City Manager City Council
CONTRACT SERVICES Amended Budget Recommended Approved
5402 Contr Svcs -Fire $7,526 $7,530
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS 7,526 7,530
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $7,526 $7,530
—91—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY -
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISION NO. 4431
Animal Control provides for the care, protection, and control of
animals who stray from their homes or are abused by their owners.
This service, currently provided by the Pomona Valley Humane
Society, includes enforcement of leash laws and the provision of a _
shelter for homeless animals.
-92-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR(DEPARTMENT: Public Safety
DIVISION: Animal ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT #: 443 1
1993-94
CONTRACT SERVICES
5403 Contr Svcs -An Contrl
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
50,000 52,500
$50,000 $52,500
—93—
$50,000 $52,500
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY -
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: EMERGENCY PREP DIVISION NO. 4440
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
The preservation of life and property is an inherent responsibility
of local, state and federal governments. The City of Diamond Bar
therefore, has prepared a comprehensive planning document, known as
the Multihazard Functional Plan, which serves as the basis for the
City's emergency organization and emergency operations. -
The primary objectives of this plan are to enhance the overall
capabilities of government to respond to emergencies. This is
accomplished by incorporating the policies, principles, concepts
and procedures contained within this plan into an efficient
organization capable of responding adequately in the face of any
disaster.
PERSONNEL
Total Positions 1 0.00
-94-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
(DEPARTMENT:
Public Safety
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
6230 Computer Equipment
DIVISION:
Emergency Prep
1994-95
6250 Equipment
ACCOUNT #:
4440
9,650 15,500 0
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
SUPPLIES
1200 Operating Supplies
2,900
5,000
TOTAL SUPPLIES
$2,900
$5,000
OPERATING EXP.
2110 Printing
2,100
2210 Postage
1,500
2125 Telephone
1,000
1,000
2126 Utilities
200
100
2130 Equipment Rent
1,000
2315 Membership & Dues
3,000
3,000
2340 Education & Training
500
500
TOTAL OPERATING EXP
$6,800
$7,100
$0
PROFESSIONAL SVCS
4040 Emergency Co-ord
TOTAL PROF SVCS
17,500
17,500
CAPITAL OUTLAY
6100 Vehicle Equipment
9,000 4,500
6230 Computer Equipment
2,500
6240 Communications Eq.
8,500
6250 Equipment
650
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
9,650 15,500 0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $36,850 $27,600 $0
MIM
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
-96-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Public Works
♦ Public Works
♦ Engineering
♦ Traffic & Transportation
♦ landscape Maintenance
-97-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY _
1994-95
DEPARTMENT TITLE: PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT NO. 4510-4556
The Public Works Department provides information on General _
Engineering matters relating to City streets, public right-of-ways,
City's Capital projects, utilities, traffic related issues, etc. to
the general public, contractors, developers, utility companies, and
other public agencies. It coordinates City projects and plans with
other governmental agencies to ensure that the City's concerns are
addressed (i.e. SCAG, LACTC, CalTrans, County of Los Angeles)
This department manages and enforces the City's requirements for
subdivisions, lot development, utilities, vehicle/pedestrian
traffic, and the use of public right-of-way. All plans and
projects for proposed development are reviewed and any required
reports are prepared for the Planning Commission, Traffic and
Transportation Commission, and the City Council.
The department is responsible for the City's traffic and
transportation activities, grant administration, and the
administration of related Capital Projects Funds.
The department is also responsible for the day-to-day maintenance
of all publically owned properties, including streets, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, traffic signals, signs, street lights, sewers
and storm drains. The department administers the maintenance
contracts to accomplish the fore mentioned items.
PERSONNEL
FULL TIME POSITIONS
Public Works Director 1.00
Senior Engineer 1.00 -
Assistant Civil Engineer 1.00
Admin Assistant 1.00
Secretary 1.00 _
Sub Total 5.00
PART TIME POSITIONS
Intern
1.00
Total Positions 6.00
-98-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Public Works
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Public Works
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4510
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010
Salaries
0030
Wages - Part time
0070
City Paid Benefits
0080
Retirement
0083
Worker's Comp Exp.
0085
Medicare /Social Security
0090.
Cafeteria Benefits
2325
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
SUPPLIES
1100 Office Supplies
-- 1200 Operating Supplies
TOTAL SUPPLIES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110
Printing
2115
Advertising
2120
Postage
2125
Telephone
2126
Utilities
2315
Membership & Dues
2320
Publications
2325
Meetings
2330
Travel-Conf & Mtgs.
2335
Mileage
2340
Education & Training
- 5530
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4230 PaverInent Management
4240 Environmental
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SVCS
CONTRACT SERVICES
5221
Contract Svcs - Engineering
5227
Contract Svcs - Inspections
5500
Contract Svcs -Public Wks
5501
Contract Svcs - Street Sweeping
- 5502
Contract Svcs - Road Maintenance
5504
Contract Svcs - Sidewalk Repair
5505
Contract Svcs - Curb/Gutter
5506
Contract Svcs - Marking/Sign Maint
5507
Contract Svcs - Traffic Signals
5512
Contract Svcs - Storm Drainage
5513
Contract Svcs - Bridge Insp Maint
- 5530
Contract Svcs - industrial Waste
$541,500 $0
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
85,100
162,600
10,250
9,900
1,150
1,600
13,400
22,800
950
2,050
2,050
3,150
12,000
17,600
$124,900
$219,700 $0
3,000
55,000
2,000
5,000
$5,000
$5,000 $0
1,000
1,500
500
1,000
700
0
1,000
104,000
45,000
60,000
100
250
500
500
500
40,000
1,000
55,000
200
10,500
1,200
4,000
$51,700 $63,250 $0
55,000 30,000
10,000
55,000 40,000
2,974
4,000
40,000
15,000
153,000
0
100,000
104,000
200,000
200,000
45,000
52,000
40,000
40,000
50,000
55,000
10,500
10,500
4,000
4,000
10,000
12,000
$610,474
$541,500 $0
-99-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR(DEPARTMENT: Public Works
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Public Works
ACCOUNT #' 4510
1994-95
1993-94 City Manager City Council _
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,000 0 0
6200 Office Equipment 1,500
6230 Computer Equipment — $4,000 $1,500 $0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $851,074 $870,950 $0 —
—100—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Public Works
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
DIVISION:
Engineering
1994-95
ACCOUNT* 4551
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
42,450
42,450
0010 Salaries
0020 Overtime
0030 Wages - Part Time
600
550
0070 City Paid Benefits
6,700
5,950
0080 Retirement
450
550
0083 Worker's Comp Exp.
650
650
0085 Medicare
0090 Cafeteria Benefits
6,000
6,000
$0
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
$56,850
$56,150
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110 Printing
1,000
2,000
500
2115 Advertising
500
250
2315 Membership & Dues
500
2325 Meetings
1,000
2330 Travel - Conterences & Meetings
200
2335 Mileage
500
1,200
2340 Education & Training
$4,000
$3,650
$0
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
CONTRACT SERVICES
70, 964
5,000
5221 Cont Svc -Engineering
85,000000
30,000
5223 Cont Svc -Plan Check
25,000
5,000
5224 Com: ,. Svc -Soils
5,000
2,500
5226 Cont Svc -Surveying
0
15,000
5227 CS -Inspection
0
5514 Cont Svc -Mapping Svc
30,000
$215,964
$57,500
$0
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
$276,814
$117,300
$0
—101—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
$6,600
DIVISION:
Traffic & Trans
1994-95
$18,500
ACCOUNT M
4553 j
$67,400
$89,350 $0
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
PERSONNEL SERVICES
0010 Salaries
29,500
32,650
0070 City Paid Benefits
600
550
0080 Retirement
4,650
4,600
0083 Worker's Comp Exp.
300
400
0085 Medicare
450
500
0090 Cafeteria Benefits
6,000
6,000
TOTAL PERSONNEL SVCS
$41,500
$44,700
$0
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2110 Printing
2115 Advertising
2315 Membership & Dues
2320 Publications
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4000 Professional Svcs
4100 Commissioner Comp
TOTAL PROF SVCS
CONTRACT SERVICES
5222 Cont Svc -Traffic
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
500 250
100 200
200 200
$800 $650 $0
3,000
3,000
3,600
3,000 -
$6,600
$6,000 $0
18,500
38,000
$18,500
$38,000 $0
$67,400
$89,350 $0
—102—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
;DIVISION:
Landscape Maint
1994-95
(ACCOUNT #:
4558
1993-94
City Manager
City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended
Approved
CONTRACT SERVICES
5503 CS -Pkwy Maint
145,700
9,500
5508 CS -Vegetation Cntrl
100,000
65,000
5509 CS -Tree Trimming
100,000
75,000
5510 CS -Tree Watering
22,000
22,000
5520 CS -Graffiti Removal
40,000
30,000
5521 CS -Litter Abatement
10,600
TOTAL CONTRACT SVCS
$407,700
$212,100.
$0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $407,700 $212,100 $0
—103—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Department - Transfers Out
♦ Transfers Out
-105-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ACTIVITY COMMENTARY
1994-95
DIVISION TITLE: TRANSFERS OUT DIVISION NO, 4915
Interfund transfers from the General Fund to other funds for Fiscal
Year 94-95 consist of transfers to the Self Insurance Fund and the
Capital Projects Fund.
The transfers to the Self Insurance Fund includes the annual
transfer as required by City Resolution 89-53 and the budgeted
amount for the City's general liability insurance premiums.
The transfer to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund is for the
annual lease purchase payment for the land which is being purchased
from the Walnut Valley Water District. This transfer will occur as
the funds are expended.
-106-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT: Transfer out
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES DIVISION: Transfer Out
1994-95 ACCOUNT #: 4915
1993-94 City Mgr. City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
9112 Transfer out-Prp A
9250 Transfer out-CIP Fd 279,154 120,000
9510 Transfer out -ins Fd 190,000 263,416
DEPARTMENT TOTAL $469,154 $383,416 $0
—107—
SPECIAL FUNDS
BUDGETS
-109-
OTHER GENERAL
FUNDS
-111-
I
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: General Fund
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Library Services
1994-95 FUND #: 010 J
LIBRARY SERVICES FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
This func s being established this Fiscal Year to account for revenues and expenditures related to
the possibility that the City would supplement the LA County Public Library funding. This fiscal year
it is being proposed that $160,000 be allocated to fund an additional two days of library operation
and $40,000 be allocated for the purchase of additional library materials. The proposed funding
source is the possible sale of $310,000 in Prop A Transit funds @ .65, which would net approximately
$200,000.
FY93-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
3355
Intergovt Revenue
200,000
3610
Interest Revenue
TOTAL
$0 $200,000 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
4355-1200
Departmental Supplies
40,000
4355-5300
Contract Services - Library
160,000
TOTAL
$0 $200,000 $0
—113—
SPECIAL REVENUE
FUNDS
-115-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Traffic Safety
1994-95 FUND #:- 110
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION.
The City receives traffic fines levied by local courts. California Penal Code (section 1463(b))
requires that these funds are to be used for traffic safety purposes. These funds are recorded
in the Traffic Safety Fund and then are consequently transferred to the General Fund for traffic
safety purposes.
-- ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
3215 Vehicle Code Fines
3610 Interest Revenue
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4915-9001 Trans out - Gen Fund
TOTAL
FY93-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
—117—
75,000 75,000
200 600
$75,200 $75,600 $0
75,200 75,600
$75,200 $75,600
CITY OF DIAMOND BARFUND TYPE: Special Revenue j
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Str Maint/Const
1994-95 FUND
GAS TAX FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City receives funds from Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5 of the Streets and Highway
Code. State law requires that these revenues be recorded in a Special Revenue Fund, and
that they be utilized solely for street -related purposes such as new construction, rehabilitation,
or maintenance.
—118—
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550
Approp. Fund Balance
$2,443,396
$2,279,531
3171
Gas Tax - 2106
276,377
274,200
3172
Gas Tax - 2107
605,114
577,000
3173
Gas Tax - 2107.5
7,500
7,500
3174
Gas Tax - 2105
403,244
417,250
3610
Interest Revenue
60,000
100,000
$o
TOTAL
$3,795,631
$3,655,481
APPROPRIATIONS:
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Palo Benefits
4099-0080
Retirement
4099-0083
Worker's Comp Exp
4099-0085
Medicare Exp
4099-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
4915-9001
Trans out - Gen Fund
744,500
647,315
4915-9225
Trans out - Grand Av
300,000
300,000
4915-9227
Trans out - Trf Mitgtn
460,600
4915-9250
Trans out- CIP Fund
1,885,000
1,892,105
2550
Reserves
405,531
816,061
$0
TOTAL
$3,795,631
$3,655,481
—118—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET AMENDMENT FUNCTION: Pub Trnsprtn
1994-95 jFUND #: 112
PROP A TRANSIT FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City receives Proposition A Tax which is a voter approved sales tax override for public
transportation purposes. This fund has been established to account for these revenues and
approved project expenditures. Budgeted expenditures for this fiscal year include holiday
shuttle, excursions, and transit services. Contributions - Other Government is for the proposed
sale of Prop A money to fund additional library services.
ESTIMATED RESERVES:
2550
Fund Balance Reserve
3110
Local Trans Tx-Prp A
3610
Interest Revenue
3485
Transit Subsidy Prg Revenue
3915
Transfer in/Gen Fd
718,100
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4090-7230
Contribs.-Other Govt
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Paid Benefits
4099-0080
Benefits
4099-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
4099-0085
Medicare Exp.
4099-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
4360-2115
Advertising
4360-5310
CS-Exursions
4360-5315
CS -Holiday Shuttle
4360-6100
Auto Equipment
4553-2315
Membership & Dues
4553-5500
Professional Svcs
4553-5528
Public Transit Svcs.
4553-5529
Para -Transit Svcs.
4553-5533
Transit Subsidy Program
4915-9250
Trans out - CIP Fund
4915-9001
Trans out - Gen Fund
2550
Fund Balance Reserve
TOTAL
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
Bus Pads - Diamond Bar Blvd.
D Bar Park & Ride Expansion
FY93-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$495,592 $854,000
483,580 538,600
18,000 15,000
50,000
$997,172 $1,457,600 $0
310,000
51,600
600
8,150
500
800
6,000
500
25,000 25,000
25,000 27,000
5,500
5,500
20,000
20,000
25,000
27,000
80,000
225,000
20,000
20,000
788,522
718,100
$977,172
$1,457,600 $0
-119-
150,000
75,000
225,000
CITY OF DIAMOND BARFUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET AMENDMENT FUNCTION: Pub Trnsprtn
1994-95 (FUND #: 112
PROP A TRANSIT FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City receives Proposition A Tax which is a voter approved sales tax override for public
transportation purposes. This fund has been established to account for these revenues and
approved project expenditures. Budgeted expenditures for this fiscal year include holiday
shuttle, excursions, and transit services. Contributions - Other Government is for the proposed
sale of Prop A money to fund additional library services.
ESTIMATED RESERVES:
2550
Fund Balance Reserve
3110
Local Trans Tx-Prp A
3610
Interest Revenue
3485
Transit Subsidy Prg Revenue
3915
Transfer in/Gen Fd
4099-0085
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4090-7230
Contribs.-Other Govt
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Paid Benefits
4099-0080
Benefits
4099-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
4099-0085
Medicare Exp.
4099-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
4360-2115
Advertising
4360-5310
0--Exursions
4360-5315
CS -Holiday Shuttle
4360-6100
Auto Equipment
4553-5500
Professional Svcs
4553-5528
Public Transit Svcs.
4553-5529
Para -Transit Svcs.
4553-5533
Transit Subsidy Program
4915-9250
Trans out - CIP Fund
4915-9001
Trans out - Gen Fund
2550
Fund Balance Reserve
TOTAL
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
Bus Pads - Diamond Bar Blvd
D Bar Park & Ride Expansion
FY93-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$495,592 $854,000
483,580 538,600
18,000 15,000
50,000
$997,172 $1,457,600 $0
51,600
600
8,150
500
800
6,000
500
25,000
25,000
5,500
310,000
25,000
27,000
20,000
20,000
25,000
27,000
80,000
225,000
20,000
20,000
788,522
723,600
$977,172
$1,457,600 $0
150,000
75,000
225,000
-120-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET
1994-95
PROPOSITION C FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
FUND TYPE: Special Revenue i
FUNCTION: Str Maint/Const
FUND #: 113
The City periodically receives additional allocations of State Gas Tax funds from Los Angeles
County. These funds must be used for street -related purposes such as construction, rehabilitation,
or maintenance. In order to receive these funds the City must submit a project to the County for
approval. Budgeted as a transfer to the General Fund is $55,000 for pavement management and
an additional $20,000 for contract engineering costs.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Fund Balance Reserve
3112 Transportation Tax
3350 Intergovt - County
3610 Interest Revenue
TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Adopted
$913,429 $1,508,429
400,000 438,150
270;000
30,000
$1,583,429 $1,976,579 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
4090-6100
4915-9001 Trans out - Gen Fund
75,000
30,000
4915-9250 Trans out - CIP Fund
620,000
870,000
2550 Fund Balance Reserve
888,429
1,076,579
TOTAL
$1,583,429
$1,976,579 $0
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE.
07494 Grand Ave Signal Synch.
06494 Diamond Bar Blvd Rehab
—121—
$450,000
420,000
$870,000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Waste Mgt
1994-95 FUND #: 115
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The Integrated Waste Management Fund was created during FY 90-91, to account for expenditures
and revenues related to the activities involved with the City's efforts to comply with AB939.
Revenues recorded in this fund are the recently adopted waste hauler fees.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550
Reserve Fund Balance
3340
Intergovt Revenues
3480
Waste Hauler Permits
3481
Application Fees
3482
AB939 Admin Fees
3483
Annual Fees
3610
Interest Revenue
4515-2100
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Paid Benefits
4099-0080
Benefits
4099-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
4099-0085
Medicare Exp.
4099-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
4515-1200
Dept. Supplies
4515-2100
Photocopying
4515-2110
Printing
4515-2115
Advertising
4515-2120
Postage
4515-2320
Publications
4515-2340
Edur�ation & Training
4515-XXXX
Contributions -Incentives Pgm
4515-4000
Prof Svcs -JPA
4515-5500
Contract Services
4515-6230
Computer Equipment
2550
Reserve Fund Balance
TOTAL
PERSONNEL:
Full Time:
Asst to City Mgr
Exec. Secretary
Total Positions
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$19,760 $39,105
$22,427
73,000
78,000
2,000
3,000
800
500
95,560
$143,032
$0
31,290
31,850
430
150
5,020
4,500
310
400
460
500
4,500
4,500
1,000
5,000
500
1,500
7,500
500
2,500
250
100
1,500
1,500
2,500
5,000
25,000
30,000
23,800
46,532
$95,560
$143,032 $0
.50
.25
.75
—122—
i
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Air Quality
1994-95 FUND #: 118
AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
This fund was established in FY 1991-92 to account for revenues received as a result of AB2766.
AB 2766 authorizes the imposition of an additional motor vehicle registration fee to fund
the implementation of air quality management plans and provisions of the California Clean Air
Act of 1988.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550
Approp. Fund Balance
3315
Pollution Reduc Fees
3610
Interest Revenue
$73,094 $0
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Paid Benefits
4099-0080
Benefits
4099-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp
4099-0085
Medicare
4099-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
4098-1200
Operating Supplies
4098-2110
Printing
4098-2120
Printing
-- 4098-2125
Telephone
4098-2205
Computer Maint
4098-2320
Publications
4098-2325
Membership & Dues
4098-4000
Professional Svcs
4098-5000
Contract Svcs
4098-6100
Vehicle Equipment
4098-6230
Computer Equipment
2550
Approp. Fund Balance
TOTAL
PERSONNEL:
Asst to City Mgr
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
41,434
31,344
40,000
40,000
1,000
1,750
$82,434
$73,094 $0
10,610
10,610
150
150
1,670
1,500
110
150
950
200
1,500
1,500
1,000
2,500
1,000
1,000
100 100
1,700
7,000
10,000
7,500
1,100
7,500
13,000
5,000
31,344
36,584
$82,434
$73,094 $0
0.25
—123—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR [FU
:D#:
YPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET AMENDMENT ON: Park lmprovemnt
1994-95 122
i
PARK FEES FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
Within the Subdivision Map Act of the California State Constitution is a requirement that
developers either contribute land or pay fees to the local municipal government to provide
recreational facilities within the development. This fund is used to account for the fees
received.
ESTIMATED REVENUE.-
2550
EVENUE:2550 Approp. Fund Balance
3456 Quimby Fees
3610 Interest Revenue
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
9001 Transfer Out -Gen Fd
9250 Transfer Out-CIP Fd
2550 Reserves
TOTAL
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
07594
Park Sign Retrofit
08094
Peterson Pk Picnic Shelter
08194
Heritage Pk -Bsktball Ct Exten
08294
Sycamore Cyn-Playgrd Pilings
08494
Starshine - Picnic Table
08594
Maplehill -Tennis Lt Fixture
08694
Reagan Pk - Tennis Lt Fixture
FY 93-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$188,187
$195,687
100,000
93,000
6,000
7,000
$294,187
$295,687 $0
10,000
88,500
74,630
195,687
221,057
$294,187
$295,687 $0
—124—
$30,000
13,880
10,000
3,350
1,400
8,000
8,000
$74,630
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET
1994-95
PROP A - SAFE PARKS ACT
FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
FUNCTION: Park Improvemnt
FUND #: 123
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Act was passed in 1992. This act provides
funds to Cities to improve, preserve, and restore parks. For FY93-94, the City of Diamond Bar
was awarded $2,040,000 for this purpose. Since the development of Pantera Park and the
Peterson Park light project was not completed in FY93-94, the balances are being carried forward
into FY94-95.
ESTIMATED REVENUE:
3320 Park Grants
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4915-9001 Transfer Out Gen Fd
4915-9250 Transfer Out-CIP Fd
2550 Reserves
TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
06594 Pantera Park -Design & Development
02494 Peterson Park - Lights
2,040,000 $2,020,000
$2,040,000 $2,020,000
30,000
1,610,000 1,590,000
400,000 430,000
$2,040,000 $2,020,000 $0
—125—
$1,450,000
140,000
$1,590,000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Community Dev
1994-95
FUND #: 125
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City receives an annual CDBG allotment from the federal government via the Community
Development Commission. The purpose of this grant is to fund approved community development
Programs and projects.
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
06694 ADA Park Retrofit 179,000
06794 Handicap Access Ramps 72,000
$251,000
—126—
1993-94
City Manager City Council
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved_
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Approp. Fund Balance
3330 CDBG Revenue
T
TOTAL
322,105
433,780
$322,105
$433,780 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
4215-0010 Salaries
4215-0030 Wages - Part Time
18'610
16,500
4215-0070 City Paid Benefits
7'870
17,160
4215-0080 Retirement
260
750
4215-0083 Wkr's Comp Exp.
2,930
4,710
4215-0085 Medicare Exp.
290
400
4215-0090 Cafeteria Benefits
890
500
4215-1200 Departmental Supplies2'700
6,600
4215-2115 Advertising
10,143
7,267
4215-2325 Meetings
250
4215-2355 Contrbtns-Com Groups250
4215-XXXX Housing Rehab
48,500
50,000
4215-4000 Professional Svcs
30,351
4215-6250 Misc Capital Equip
5,000
7,850
4915-9250 Transfer Out-CIP
32,750
21,000
2550 Reserves
168,580
251,000
TOTAL
23,582
19,192
.
$322,105
$433,780 $0
PERSONNEL INCLUDES:
Admin Assistant
Clerk Typist
0.300
Asst. City Manager
0.100
Com Dev Director
0.025
0.025
0.450
CS Coordinator/Seniors
1.000
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
06694 ADA Park Retrofit 179,000
06794 Handicap Access Ramps 72,000
$251,000
—126—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Landscape
1994-95 FUND #: 138
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - DIST. #38 FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City is responsible for the operations of the LLAD #38. This district was set up in accordance
with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Property owners benefiting from this district receive
a special assessment on their property taxes. This fund is to account for the cost of the operations
of this special district.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Approp. Fund Balance
3015 Prop Tx -Sp Assessmnt
3610 Interest Revenue
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
Personal Services
4538-0010 Salaries
4538-0070 City Paid Benefits
4538-0080 Benefits
4538-0083 Wkr's Comp Exp.
- 4538-0085 Medicare Exp.
4538-0090 Cafeteria Benefits
Total Personal Svcs
Operating Expenses
4538-2126 Utilities
4538-2210 Maint-Grounds & Bldg
Total Operating Expense
Professional Services
4538-4000 Professional Svcs
Contract Services
- 4538-5500 Contract Svcs
Capital Outlay
4538-6410 Capital Improvements
Fund Balance Reserves
2550 Reserves
TOTAL
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
06894 Gln Sprgs Medians
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$173,645
$242,467
256,500
260,745
2,000
4,000
$432,145
$507,212 $0
28,000
28,100
400
350
4,400
3,950
1,200
1,400
400
450
3,600
3,550
38,000
37,800 0
66,000
77,200
15,000
19,200
81,000
96,400 0
-127-
10,488 3,920
41,500 46,000
234,865 260,000
26,292 63,092
$432,145 $507,212 $0
260,000
$260,000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 'FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Landscape
1994-95 iFUND #: 139
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - DIST. #39 FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City is responsible for the operations of the LLAD #39. This district was set up in accordance
with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Property owners benefiting from this district receive
a special assessment on their property taxes. This fund is to account for the cost of the operations
of this special district.
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommmended Approved
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
Personal Services
4539-0010
2550 Reserve Fund Balance
$105,273
$58,066
3015 Prop Tx -Sp Assessmnt
91,781
94,080
3610 Interest
4,000
4,000 —
TOTAL
$201054
$156,146 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
Personal Services
4539-0010
Salaries
4539-0070
City Paid Benefits
4539-0080
Retirement
4539-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
4539-0085
Medicare Exp.
4539-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
Total Personal Svcs
Operating Expenses
4539-2126
Utilities
4539-2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg
4539-7200
Insurance Expense
Total Operating Expense
Professional Services
4539-4000
Professional Svcs
Contract Services
4539-5500
Contract Svcs
Capital Outlay
4539-6410
Capital improvements
Fund Balance Reserves
2550
Reserve Fund Balance
TOTAL
—128—
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
53,000 60,500
15,000 17,500
68,000 78,000 0
2,988 1,410
72,000 74,600
58,066 2,136
$201,054 $156,146 $0
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Special Revenue
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Landscape
1994-95 FUND #: 141
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - DIST. #41 FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The City is responsible for the operations of LLAD #41. This district was set up in accordance
with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Property owners benefiting from this district receive
a special assessment on their property taxes. This fund is to account for the cost of the operations
of this special fund.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Approp. Fund Balance
3015 Prop Tx -Sp Assessmnt
3610 Interest Revenue
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
Personal Services
4541-0010
Salaries
4541-0070
City Paid Benefits
-- 4541-0080
Retirement
4541-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
4541-0085
Medicare Exp.
4541-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
Total Personal Services
Operating Expenses
4541-2126
Utilities
- 4541-2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg
Total Operating Expense
Professional Services
45414000
Professional Svcs
Contract Services
4541-5500
Contract Svcs
4541-5519
Weed/Pest Abatement
-
Total Contract Services
Capital Outlay
4541-6410
Capital Improvements
- Fund Balance Reserves
2550
Reserve Fund Balance
TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
$133,764
$92,430
121,154
124,141
2,800
3,000
$257,718
$219,571 $0-
19,800 0
300 0
1,900 0
900 0
300 0
2,600 0
25,800 0 u
50,000
57,600
5,000
12,000
55,000
69,600 0
2,488
1,870
41,000
43,050
16,000
6,000
57,000
49,050 0
-129-
25,000
92,430 99,051
$257,718 $219,571 $0
CAPITAL PROJECTS
FUNDS
-131-
r
CO
J
H
U
a0
m N
oCL
L
z
ZLO
w1*
Q 20)
O j
CD
C5 !6
04 C%4
coo
Lr) r- N
N
.1 ..........
U)
o a ALL
C14 N
W P
CL
0
a.
z
21 0 z Lo
Lu
Ct
0
w
> LL
LL b
0
q Ct q R
C14 (D
0 0 rLo I--
LO --
C14
CO)
0)
> LL
LLE E o
CL
X
UJ Q
(D ff0 06 CL 0
"
V a.
49 m E a CD
°J'��°oas
00 >
>
-p
2 Z
.(Dma
Cb
e)
06 0
M m
17 CL U) Com~ 0
Q 0
E 0 o
E d)
m25 6
0
A
1) 1 00
or
-133-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Capital Project
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Str Improvement
1994-95 FUND #: 225
GRAND AVE CONSTRUCTION FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
During FY 89-90, the City entered into an agreement with the County of San Bernardino to settle
it's Grand Ave. litigation. This agreement state that the County would provide the City with funds
for improvements which are relevant to the Grand Ave. opening. The agreement state that these
funds were to be held in a special fund and expenditures for improvements were to be made from
this fund. This fund was established to record these activities.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Approp Fund Balance
3915-9111 Transfer in -Gas Tax
3915-9255 Transfer in-SB821
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4099-0010
Salaries
4099-0070
City Paid Benefits
4099-0080
Retirement
4099-0083
Worker's Comp Exp
4099-0085
Medicare Exp
4099-0090,
Cafeteria Benefits
4510-6411
Street Improvements
4510-6412
Traffic Control Improvements
4915-9001
Transfer to Gen Fd
2550
CIP Reserve
TOTAL
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
06394 Grand Ave. Overlay
1993-94 City Manager Ctly Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
442,841
404,300
300,000
300,000
20,000
20,000
$762,841
$724,300 $0
770,000 724,300
8,927
(16,086)
$762,841 $724,300 $0
—134—
$724,300
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Capital Project
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Capital Project
1994-95 FUND #: 250
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
This fund was created to account for the City capital improvement projects which are not required
to be accounted for in independent funds. The revenues in this fund will generally come from
transfers -in from other funds and have been identified for specific capital projects.
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550
CIP Reserve-Traf Sig
3455
Developer Fees
3610
Interest Revenue
3915-9001
Transfer In -Gen Fd
3915-9111
Transfer in -Gas Tx
3915-9112
Transfer In-Prp A
3915-9113
Transfer in -Prop C
3915-9121
Transfer in -Pk Grant
- 3915-9122
Transfer in -Pk Fees
3915-9123
Trnsfer in-Prp A Pks
3915-9125
Transfer in-CDBG
3915-9138
Transfer in-LLAD #38
3915-9255
Transfer in -SB 821
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS:
4510-00xx
Salaries & Benefits
4510-6411
Street Improvements
_ 4510-6412
Traffic Control Imp
4310-6415
Park & Rec Imprmts
4510-6416
Landscape & Irr Imp
4215-6420
Municipal Bldg & Fac
- 2550
CIP Reserve-Traf Sig
2550
CIP Reserve-Str Imp
TOTAL
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
102,395
127,400 37,500
238,154
120,000
1,932,768
1,892,105
225,000
620,000
870,000
40,000
88,500
74,630
1,610,000
1,590,000
168,580
293,800
260,000
60,000
50,000
$4,885,402
$5,515,430 $0
1,445,000
1,145,000
1,783,100
182,980
102,400
1,377,000
1,575,000
1,845,630
260,000
457,800
$4,658,480 $5,515,430 $0
—135—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Capital Project
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Capital Project
1994-95 FUND #: 250
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND -
FY94-95 CAPITAL EWROVEMENT PROJECTS INCLUDE:
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
01494 Slurry Seal (V Phase) $185,000
Gas Tax
05694 D Bar Blvd Sidewalks 150,000
Gas Tax
06494 Diamond Bar Blvd Rehab 892,000
Gas Tax (392,000)
Prop C (450,000) —
SB 821 (50,000)
Golden Springs - Seepage 100,000
Rule 20A Undergrounding 50,000
Gas Tax
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $1,377,000
TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS:
07094
DB BI/Shadow Cyn/Ftn Spgs
170,000
Gas Tax (145,000)
—
Dev Fees (25,000)
07194
Gldn Sprgs @ Prospector's
124,000 —
Gas Tax
07294
Gldn Sprgs @ Gldn Prados
124,000 _
Gas Tax
07394
Gldn Sprgs @ Carpio
124,000
Gas Tax
—
07494
Grand Ave Signal Synchr
420,000
Prop C (MTA)
_
SB Gldn Spgs/DB Blvd Left Turn
30,000
Gas Tax (17,500)
Developer (12,500)
_
Signal -DB @ SR on/off Ramps
175,000
Gas Tax (72,605)
—
CIP Reserve - TS (102,395)
Grand/Longview Mast Arm Ext.
3,000 --
Gas Tax
—136—
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
FUND TYPE: Capital Project
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET
General Fund
FUNCTION: Capital Project
1994-95
112,800
CDBG
FUND #: 250
Diamond Bar Blvd -Bus Pads
150,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
75,000
NB DB Biv @ Pthfndr - Left Turn
30,000
-- TOTAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS & FACILITIES $457,800
TS: #A - from Warrant Study
125,000
TS: #B - from Warrant Study
125,000
TS: #C - from Warrant Study
125,000
Gas Tax
TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS
$1,575,000
PARK & REC IMPROVEMENTS:
06594
Pantera Pk -Design & Dev
$1,450,000
Prop A -Safe Pks
02494
Peterson Pk -Lights
140,000
Prop A -Safe Pks
06694
ADA Parks Retrofit
181,000
CDBG
07594
City Park Signage Retrofit
30,000
08094
Peterson Park - Picnic Shelter
13,880
08194
Heritage Park -Basketball Ct. Ext
10,000
08294
Sycamore Cyn - Playground Pilin
3,350
08494
Starshine - Picnic Table
1,400
08594
Mapleh41-Tennis Light Fixture
8,000
- 08694
Reagen Park - Tennis Light Fixtur
8,000
Quimby Act
TOTAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS
$1,845,630
MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS & FACILITIES:
- 06394 Land Acquisition
$120,000
General Fund
06794 Handicap Access Ramps
112,800
CDBG
Diamond Bar Blvd -Bus Pads
150,000
Diamond Bar Park & Ride Expans
75,000
Prop A
-- TOTAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS & FACILITIES $457,800
LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
06894 Golden Springs Medians 260,000
LLAD #38
TOTAL LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION IMPRVMTS $260,000
GRAND TOTAL - CAPITAL PROJECTS —137—
$5,515,430
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET
1994-95
FUND TYPE: Capital Project
FUNCTION: Capital Project
FUND #: 255
SB 821 FUND
Trans out -Grand Ave
20,000
20,000
4915-9227
Trans out -Traffic Mit
FUND DESCRIPTION:
The state allocates funds to cities for the specific purpose of the construction of bike and
pedestrian paths via S6821. This fund has been
established to account for transactions related
to the receipt and expenditure of these funds.
2550
CIP Reserve
80,255
1993-94
City Manager City Council
TOTAL
Amended Budget
Recommended Approved _
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
06394
Grand Ave Rehab
3350 From Other Agencies
21,000
18,000
3610 Interest Revenue
3,000
3,000
2550 CIP Reserve
156,255
100,255
TOTAL
$180,255
$121,255 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
4915-9225
Trans out -Grand Ave
20,000
20,000
4915-9227
Trans out -Traffic Mit
20,000
4915-9250
Trans out-CIP Fd
60,000
_
50,000
2550
CIP Reserve
80,255
51,255
TOTAL
$180,255
$121,255 $0
CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDE:
_
06394
Grand Ave Rehab
20,000
06494
Diamond Bar Blvd
50,000
70,000
—138—
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
-139-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FUND TYPE: Internal Svc
SPECIAL FUNDS BUDGET FUNCTION: Self Insurance
1994-95 FUND #: 510
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FUND DESCRIPTION:
This fund was established in accordance with Resolution #89-53. The resolution states the City
will establish a self-insurance reserve fund. The purpose of the fund shall be to pay all self -
assumed losses and related costs.
Contributions to the fund shall be pro -rata from all other
City funds afforded protection under the program based upon each of the funds exposure to liability.
1993-94 City Manager City Council
Amended Budget Recommended Approved
ESTIMATED RESOURCES:
2550 Reserved Fund Bal
460,655 432,886
3610 Interest Revenue
10,000 10,000
3915-9001 Transfer in -Gen Fd
190,000 263,416
TOTAL
$660,655 $706,302 $0
APPROPRIATIONS:
4810-7200 Insurance Exp.
90,000 163,416
_ 4810-7210 Insurance Deposit
100,000
4810-7220 Claims & Judgements
2550 Self Ins Reserve
570,655 442,886
TOTAL
$660,655 $706,302 $0
—141—
GLOSSARY
-143-
GLOSSARY
Activity - The smallest unit of budgetary accountability and
control which encompasses a specific unit of work or service
responsibility. A sub -unit of a Function budget.
Adoption - Formal action of the City Council which sets the
spending limits for the fiscal year.
Allocate - To divide a lump -sum appropriation which is designated
for expenditure by specific organization units and/or for specific
purposes, activities, or objects.
Annual Budget - A budget applicable to a single fiscal year.
Appropriation - An authorization made by the council which permits
the City to incur obligations and to make expenditures of
resources.
Audit - Prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant
(CPA) , the primary objective of an audit is to determine if the
City's Financial Statements present fairly the City's financial
position and .results of operations in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. In conjunction with their
performance of an audit, it is customary for an independent auditor
to issue a Management Letter stating the adequacy of the City's
internal controls a well as recommending improvements to the City's
financial management practices.
Bud - A financial plan for a specified period of time that
matches planned revenues and expenditures to municipal services.
Budget Calendar - A schedule of key dates which the City follows in
the preparation, adoption, and administration of the budget.
Budget Message - Included -in the opening section of the budget, the
Budget Message provides the Council and the public with a general
summary of the most important aspects of the budget, changes from
the previous fiscal years, and the views and recommendations of the
City Manager.
Capital Improvement- Program (CIP) - A program to provide for the
maintenance or replacement of existing public facilities and assets
and for the construction`or acquisition of new ones.
Contingency - An appropriation of funds to cover unforeseen events
that occur during the fiscal year, such as flood emergencies,
Federal Mandates, shortfalls in revenue, and similar. eventualities.
-145-
Contractual Services - Services rendered to City activities by
private firms, individuals or other governmental agencies.
Examples of these services include traffic engineering, law -
enforcement, and city attorney services.
Department - A major organizational unit of the City which has been
assigned overall management responsibility for an operation or a
group of related operations within a functional area.
Designated Fund Balance - A portion of unreserved fund balance -
designated by City policy for a specific future use.
Encumbrance - The legal commitment of appropriated funds to _
purchase an item or service. To encumber funds means to set aside
or commit funds for a future expenditure.
Fees for Services - Charges paid to the City by users of a service
to help support the costs of providing that service.
Fiscal Year - The beginning and ending period for recording
financial transactions. The City has specified July 1 to June 30
as its fiscal year.
Fixed Assets - Assets of long-term nature such as land, buildings,
machinery, furniture, and other equipment. The City has defined
such assets as those with an expected life in excess of one year
and an acquisition cost in excess of $300.
Franchise Fee - A franchise fee is charged for the privilege of
using public rights-of-way and property within the City for public
or private purposes. The City currently assesses franchise fees on
cable television, bus stop shelters and utilities.
Fund - An accounting entity that records all financial transactions for specific activities or government functions. The generic fund
types used by the City are: General, Special Revenue, Capital
Project, and Insurance Funds. -
Fund Balance The excess of current assets over current
liabilities, and represents the cumulative effect of revenues and
other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses.
General Fund - The primary operating fund of the City, all revenues
that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to a -
specific fund are accounted for in the General Fund. With the
exception of subvention or grant revenues restricted for specific
uses, General Fund resources can be utilized for any legitimate
governmental purpose.
Goal - A statement of broad direction, purpose, or intent.
Infrastructure - The physical assets of the City, i.e., streets,
water, sewer, public buildings, and parks, and the support
structures within a development.
-146-
Investment Revenue - Revenue received as interest from the
investment of funds not immediately required to meet cash
disbursement obligations.
Key Objective - A statement of specific direction, purpose, or
intent based on the needs of the community and the goals
established for a specific program.
Line -Item Budget - A budget that lists detailed expenditure
categories (salary, materials, telephone service, travel, etc.)
separately, along with the amount budgeted for each specified
category. The city uses a program rather that line -item budget,
although detail line -item accounts are maintained and recorded for
financial reporting and control purposes.
Municipal - In its broadest sense, an adjective which denotes the
state and all subordinate units of government. In a more
restricted sense, an adjective which denotes a city or village as
opposed to other local government.
-
Objects of Expenditure - The individual expenditure accounts used
to record each type of expenditure City operations incur. For
budgeting purposes, objects of expenditure are categorized into
- groups of similar types of expenditures called major objects of
expenditure. The principle objects of expenditure used in the
budget are:
• Personal Services: Salaries and benefits paid to City
employees. Includes items such as
special duty salaries and
retirement.
• Supplies: Amounts paid for items that are
consumed or deteriorated through use
or that lose their identity through
fabrication I or incorporation into
different or more complex units or
substances.
• Operating Expenditures: Office supplies, materials and
other items used in the normal
operations of the City departments.
Includes items such as books,
maintenance materials and
contractual services..
• Professional Services: Services supporting the
government. These professionals
include physicians, lawyers,
architects, auditors, therapists,
systems analysts, planners, etc.
-147-
• Capital Outlay: Expenditures which qualify as
capital costs according to
accounting standards. This includes
furniture, fixtures, machinery,
equipment and other relatively minor
fixed assets. -
Operating Budget - The portion of the budget that pertains to daily
operations providing basic governmental services. The program _
budgets in the financial plan form the operating budget.
Ordinance - A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. It
has the full force and effect of law within the City boundaries
unless it is in conflict with any higher form of law, such as a
State statute or constitutional provision.
Policy - A direction that must be followed to advance toward a
goal. The direction can be a course of actin or a guiding
principle.
Property Tax - A statutory limited tax levy which may be imposed
for any purpose.
Program - A grouping of activities organized to accomplish basic
goals and objectives.
Program Budget - A budget that focuses upon the goals and objective
of an agency or jurisdiction rather than upon its organizational
budget units or object classes of expenditure.
Reserve - An account used to indicate that a portion of a fund's
balance is legally restricted for a specific purpose and is,
therefore, not available for general appropriation. _
Resolution - A special order of the City. Council which requires
less legal formality than an ordinance in terms of public notice
and the number of public readings prior to approval.
Revenue - Funds that the government receives as income. It
includes such items as tax payments, fees from specific services, -
receipts from other governments, fines, forfeitures, grants, shared
revenues and interest income.
Risk Management - An organized attempt to protect an organization's
assets against accidental loss in the most cost-effective manner.
Sales Tax - A tax on the purchase of goods and services.
SCJPIA - Southern California Joint Powers Authority. _
Special Assessment - A compulsory levy made against certain
properties to defray part or all of the cost of a specific
improvement or service deemed to primarily benefit those parties.
-148-
Special Revenue Funds - Funds used to account for the proceeds from
specific revenue sources (other than trusts or major capital
projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific
purposes.
Subventions - Revenues collected by the State (or other level of
government) which are allocated to the City on a formula basis.
The major subventions received by the Cit from the State of
California include motor vehicle in -lieu, cigarette taxes and
gasoline taxes.
Trust and Aaencv Funds - Also known as Fiduciary Fund Types, these
funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee
capacity or as an agent for private individuals, organizations or
other governmental agencies.
User Fees - The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a service by
the party benefiting from the service.
Working Capital - Difference between current assets and current
liabilities.
-149-
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET
FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND ENDING JUNE
30, 1995 INCLUDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS,
SPECIAL FUNDS AND CAPITAL- IMPROVEMENTS AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS,
DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET
FORTH.
A. Recitals
(i) The City Manager has heretofore prepared and
presented to this City Council a proposed budget for the City's
fiscal year 1994-95, including staffing and position allocations,
maintenance and operations, special funds and capital improvements,
including appropriations therefor (the "Budget" sometimes
hereinafter).
(ii) The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond
Bar has heretofore publicly reviewed the proposed capital
improvements specified in the Budget and has rendered to the City
Council its report thereon concerning conformity of the capital
improvement program with the City's contemplated general plan, all
as required by California Government Code Section 65401. Copies of
the Budget are on file in the office of the City Clerk labeled
"City of Diamond Bar 1994-95 Budget" and said Budget hereby is made
a part of this Resolution.
(iii) The City Council has conducted a public hearing
on the entirety of the fiscal year 1994-1995 Budget and concluded
said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
I. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution.
2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
capital improvement program set forth in the Budget, and each
project identified therein, is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder pursuant to
Section 15301 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
3. The Budget, including the changes enumerated and
directed to be made by the City Council during the course of the
public hearing conducted by the City Council, hereby is adopted as
the Budget of the City of Diamond Bar for the fiscal year
commencing July 1, 1994 and ending June 30, 1995 and consisting of
the estimated and anticipated expenditures and revenues for that
fiscal year.
4. There are hereby appropriated for obligations and
expenditures by the City Manager the amounts shown for the various
departments, divisions and objects set forth in the Budget. All
obligations and expenditures shall be incurred and made in the
manner provided by the provisions of State law and City ordinances
and resolutions applicable to purchasing and contracting.
5. Subject to further provision of this Resolution, the
appropriations made above constitute the maximum amount authorized
for obligation and expenditure by the City Manager for respective
departments, divisions and objects as set forth in the Budget.
Each department head shall be responsible, as well as the City
Manager, for seeing that said maximum amounts are not exceeded.
6. No warrant shall issue nor shall any indebtedness be
incurred which exceeds the unexpended balance of the fund and
department appropriations hereinabove authorized unless such
appropriations shall have been amended by a supplemental
appropriation duly enacted by the City Council, or by individual
appropriations within any aforesaid fund or department therein,
except insofar as the City Manager may authorized transfers
pursuant to this Resolution.
7. Within the various funds and departments contained in
the Budget, the City Manager is authorized to employ, during the
fiscal year covered by said Budget, the number and classification
of such full time employees as are shown in the Budget all subject
to the provisions of the City's classification and compensation
plans as amended and adopted by the City Council. Part time and
seasonal employees are authorized as necessary by the City Manager
provided that the total to be obligated and expended within any
fund and department set forth in the Budget, with respect to
salaries and wages therefor, shall not exceed the budgeted and
appropriated amount, as the same may be amended by the City
Council, from time to time.
B. The City Manager hereby is authorized to transfer
funds appropriated hereby or by supplemental appropriation as
follows: With respect to those classifications designated by code
1000 series, 2000 series, 4000 series, 5000 series and code 6000
series, the City Manager may transfer amounts between and within
those classifications, but only within a department or fund.
9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of
1994.
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted
and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond bar held on the day of 1994, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Regular Meeting at
the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium,
located at 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California at 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, July 19, 1994.
Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda.
I, LYNDA BURGESS, declare as follows:
I am the City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that a copy
of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar City
Council, to be held on July 19, 1994 was posted at their proper
locations.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and
that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 15th day of
July, 1994, at Diamond Bar, California.
/s/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
PROPOSED BUDGET PREVIOUSLY DISTRIBUTED
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 23, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Meyer.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Meyer; Vice Chairwoman Plunk;
Commissioners: Flamenbaum, Schad, and Fong
Also Present: Community Development Director James
DeStefano; Associate Planner Rob Searcy;
Assistant Planner Ann Lungu; Interim City
Attorney Michael Montgomery; Engineer Mike
Myers; and Contract Recording Secretary Liz
Myers
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of April 25, 1994 and May 9, 1994
Moved by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by C/Schad and carried
unanimously to approve the minutes of April 25, 1994 and May
9, 1994, as presented.
NEW BUSINESS
2. Planned Sign Program No. 94-5
As'tP/Lungu reported that the property owner, Chevron U.S.A.
Inc., and the applicant, Robert H. Lee & Associates, are
requesting approval of Planned Sign Program No. 94-5 which
includes a proposed freestanding monument sign with legal
price sign and a legal price sign for an existing automobile
service station located at 21095 E. Golden Springs Drive
(Parcel Map 7207, Lot 1). She reviewed the application as
outlined in the staff report. It is recommended that the
Planning Commission approve Planned Sign Program No. 94-5,
Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed within the attached
resolution.
Chair/Meyer opened the meeting and invited those wishing to
speak to come forward.
Mark Butzspan, with Robert Lee & Associates, 1201 S. Beach
Boulevard, La Habra Heights, expressed concurrence with the
conditions as listed by staff.
May 23, 1994 Page 2
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer closed
the meeting and returned the matter to the Planning Commission
for consideration.
Moved by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by C/Schad and carried
unanimously to adopt a resolution recommending approval of
Planned Sign Program 94-5, with the Findings of Fact, and
listed conditions.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
3. Zone Change No. 92-2, Vesting Tentative Map No. 51169,
Conditional Use Permit No. 92-3, Oak Tree Permit No. 92-3, and
Environmental Impact Report No. -92-2
Chair/Meyer noted that it is staff's recommendation to
continue this item to the regular meeting of June 13, 1994.
C/Flamenbaum inquired if SEATAC has completed their
environmental review regarding this project.
C/Schad stated that SEATAC has had a meeting and is in the
process of finalizing their report.
Chair/Meyer declared the public hearing opened and invited
those wishing to speak to come forward.
Lex Williman, the Planning Director for Hunsaker & Associates,
10179 Huntington Street, San Diego, expressed concurrence to
the continuance and waived his right to a speedy review of the
tentative map. He confirmed that SEATAC has met and has
prepared a draft report on their environmental review of the
project.
Max Maxwell, residing at 3211 Bent Twig, read a letter from
Jerry Yeh to the City Council, dated January 21, 1992, which
indicated their opposition to the GPAC recommendation of RH 1
du/2.5 ac because it is felt to be inconsistent with existing
adjoining land in The Country, and requested a land use
designation of RR 1 du/ac. Mr. Maxwell pointed out that there
are quite a few dates back in 1992 to substantiate the
proposal of a 1 du/2.5 ac land designation for the back hills
of The Country. He suggested that the applicant hold their
project until the General Plan has,been approved.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer returned
the matter to the Planning Commission for consideration.
Chair/Meyer directed staff to address Mr. Maxwell's comments
in the staff report available June 13, 1994.
Moved by VC/Plunk, seconded by C/Schad and carried unanimously
to continue the public hearing to the regular meeting of June
13, 1994
May 23, 1994 Page 3
Chair/Meyer suggested that item 5 of the agenda, the South
Pointe project, be considered prior to item.4 of the agenda,
Parcel Map No. 24031, to assure the Planning Commission has
sufficient time to discuss the South Pointe issue as directed
by the City Council.
There being no objection, the order of the following two
agenda items were reversed.
OLD BUSINESS
4. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOS. 92-1 AND 2; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 51407, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-8; AND OAR TREE
PERMIT NO. 92-8; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32400,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-5, AND OAR TREE PERMIT NO. 91-2;
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51253 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
92-12; OAK TREE PERMIT NO 92-9; THE SOUTH POINTE MASTER PLAN;
AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 92-1
AP/Searcy reported that the Planning Commission has been
directed to consider project alternatives identified within
the South Pointe Master Plan which were not contemplated as
elements of the original project. He stated that Alternatives
No. 1 and No. 2 are actual project revisions which supply new
information whereas Alternative Nos. 3, 4, and 5 supply no new
information. He then reviewed the five alternatives as
outlined in the staff report.
CDD/DeStefano stated that it is recommended that the Planning
Commission review the submitted request, receive public
comments and direct staff to prepare the appropriate
Commission recommendation for the City Council's consideration
at their special meeting scheduled May 31, 1994.
C/Schad read a statement indicating he will not be
participating in the final vote pertaining to the South Pointe
Master Plan project due to a perceived conflict of interest;
however, he will be participating in the public hearing as a
citizen.
Chair/Meyer stated that the City received correspondence from
Sasak Corporation, dated May 13, 1994, requesting favorable
consideration of Tentative Tract Map No. 51253, and
correspondence from Mr. Don Gravdahl, dated May 10, 1994.
Chair/Meyer invited the proponents of the project to come
forward and provide testimony.
Jan Dabney, 671 S. Brea Canyon Road, Ste. 5, stated that he is
available to answer any questions.
C/Fong asked how the proposed road from Brea Canyon to the
development and the school, as outlined in Alternative No. 1,
will cross the blue line stream.
May 23, 1994 Page 4
Jan Dabney explained that it is anticipated that an arch
culvert will be used to go into the stream bed to allow the
utilities to cross at that point without interfering with the
structure. He stated that the structure will be large, and
have PCC on one side for access above the water level to allow
people who want to utilize the canyon to walk through the
structure without disturbing the environment.
VC/Plunk, noting that the proposed road has a 9.5% grade at
the bottom of the canyon, stated that it was her understanding
that a 7% grade was recommended for school buses.
Jan Dabney stated that, though the desirable grade is 8%, the
Walnut Valley Unified School District (WVUSD) indicated that
the secondary access provided more of a benefit then worrying
about a grade application.
In response to Chair/Meyer, Jan Dabney stated that the
applicants desire the City Council to approve the original
South Pointe Master Plan as presented; however, alternatives
were developed in response to requests from several members of
the City Council to address the communities concern regarding
preservation. He then expressed his opinion that the
compromise proposed to the developers compromises the
community more than the developers.
Dr. Hockwalt, the Superintendent of the WVUSD, stated that the
WVUSD is in the position to build the South Pointe Middle
School with the cooperation of the City Council to get the
grading permits to move the dirt from the present site.
Frank Arciero, Jr., 950 N. Tustin Ave., Anaheim, Arciero &
Sons, stated that Alternative No. 1 is a proposal that gives
the opportunity to preserve Sandstone Canyon by dedicating
this 75 acre site to the public, and it also facilitates the
construction of the school.
Chair/Meyer opened the meeting and invited those wishing to
speak to come forward.
Robert Broddman, residing on Knoll Court, opposed to
Alternative No. 1, pointed out that the City need not take
ownership of the 75 acre Sandstone Canyon site because the
City can already restrict development on that piece of
property and maintain it as open space without having any
linkage to the Grand Avenue project. He stated that the
continuous development of the City is negatively affecting all
residents.
Fred Fidel, residing at 24046 Shot Gun Lane, expressed concern
that wildlife has no where to go with the continuous trend
towards development.
May 23, 1994 Page 5
Michael Ferry, residing at 24300 Knoll Court, in opposition to
Parcel Map No. 24031, stated that they were specifically told
by Brock and TransAmerica that the proposed site will remain
as an agricultural green belt. He pointed out that additional
development in that area will create additional traffic on
Grand Avenue, which is already significantly impacted.
Tom Cooper, residing at 1552 Summitridge Drive, in opposition
to lifting the map restrictions on Parcel Map No. 24031,
stated that the development of that parcel provides no benefit
to existing homeowners, but rather adds more noise and traffic
congestion on Grand Avenue. He expressed concern that
Alternative No. 1 attempts to pit residents against one
another by taking land from one area to give to another. He
pointed out that keeping the map restrictions in place does
not subject the City to any new legal liabilities, but lifting
the restrictions will create legal actions and arguments that
will occupy the residents, City Council, and the developers
for years to come.
Don Schad stated that he was against the South Pointe Middle
School being constructed in its present location due to its
accessibility and impact to the neighborhood, but never
against the school actually being built; however, since it is
located at that site, the dirt should be removed and the
school should be constructed immediately. He stated that the
dirt can be placed on the Arciero property several hundred
feet from the stream, which will leave the trees intact,
provide water for all the other forms of life, and a strip of
land can be set aside for the development of homes beyond that
boundary, without doing permanent damage to the entire area.
He expressed his opinion that the EIR is incomplete and
inaccurate. He stated that the canyon is invaluable and must
be preserved for the children today and in the future.
In response to VC/Plunk's inquiry regarding his preferred
alternative, Mr. Schad stated that he would prefer no
development in the canyon, and putting the canyon into a
conservancy for preservation and restoration; however, since
Mr. Arciero has development rights to his property, then he
would concur with putting the dirt on the Arciero property,
to facilitate the construction of the school development, "and
allowing Arciero to develop his site.
In response to C/Fong, Mr. Schad stated that all the proposals
should be considered separate from one another. He also
stated that the Grand Avenue site should not be developed if
it has map restrictions and if the residents in the area do
not want it disturbed or developed.
Romaine Biedelman, residing at 1926 Derringer Lane, submitted
petitions with 73 signatures opposing Parcel Map No. 24031.
She expressed concern with the increase in traffic and noise
May 23, 1994 Page 6
resulting from the development, as well as a concern regarding
potential mud slides.
Sharon Hogan, residing at 1556 Summitridge Drive, in
opposition to the development of Parcel Map No. 24031, stated
that they were told that the site would always be preserved in
its natural state. She stated that the proposal would place
an additional burden on local schools and would increase
traffic.
Chair/Meyer expressed concern that the comments made regarding
Parcel Map No. 24031 will only be included into the record for
the South Pointe Master Plan but not into the record for the
public hearing on Parcel Map No. 24031 unless all comments are
repeated at that time.
ICA/Montgomery noted that, had the order of the agenda not
been reversed, then Parcel Map No. 24031 would have been
discussed prior to the South Pointe issue, and a decision
regarding Alternative No. 1 would have been rendered; however,
at this point, since both issues overlap, there will be a
duplication of testimony.
C/Flamenbaum suggested opening the meeting to allow public
comments on both items, since the issues are inter -related,
and incorporate the comments on the South Pointe issue into
the record for Parcel Map No. 24031.
ICA/Montgomery stated that he assumes the exchange is not
going to be favored by the proponents in the event that the
deed restrictions are not removed; therefore, he concurred
that they are partially the same issue.
PUBLIC HEARING
S. Parcel Map No. 24031
Chair/Meyer declared the public hearing opened for Parcel Map
No. 24031, to run concurrent with the continued public comment
portion of the South Pointe Master Plan agenda item,
requesting that the public record appropriately reflect all
the comments made regarding the South Pointe Master Plan to be
considered as part of the record for the Parcel Map No. 24031
public hearing.
RECESSED: Chair/Meyer recessed the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
RECONVENED: Chair/Meyer reconvened the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
Chair/Meyer stated that the Planning Commission will accept
concurrent testimony on the South Pointe project and Parcel
Map No. 24031. He then stated that the City received
correspondence from Tamerica Products, Inc., dated May 9,
May 23, 1994 Page 7
1994, regarding Parcel Map No. 24031, and from Michael Scott,
dated May 12, 1994, regarding Parcel Map No. 24031.
Barbara Beach-Courschesne, residing at 2021 Peaceful Hills
Road, in opposition to Alternative No. 1, stated that the
building restrictions on the RnP property in the SouthPointe
site should remain as was promised to the residents, as should
the building restriction on the RnP property on the Grand
Avenue site. She pointed out that there are no overriding
considerations to permit the lifting of the building
restrictions, and there is a strong probability that the
project will be detrimental and inconsistent to the future
adopted General Plan since GPAC has recommended that deed and
map restrictions be honored. She also pointed out that
alternatives to the dirt removal may have to be considered
since the Department of Fish and Game may not allow dirt to be
dumped on the blue line stream on the westerly portion of
tract 51407, regardless of what is indicated in the approved
EIR. She then expressed opposition to Alternative No. 2
because there are no overriding considerations, and because
the blue line stream would be destroyed on Arcierofs property.
She stated that Mr. Arciero should not be denied his building
rights; however, it must be taken into consideration that his
property is environmentally sensitive. She expressed support
for Alternative No. 3. She then expressed opposition to
Alternative No. 4, noting the multiple flaws in the EIR
report, and to Alternative No. 5, suggesting that it is time
for the City to move on.
David Capestro, residing at 1652 South Longview, inquired if
all comments made regarding the South Pointe agenda item will
be included into the record for this item.
Chair/Meyer stated that all comments made will be incorporated
into the public record for both agenda items.
David Capestro expressed opposition to Parcel Map No. 24031.
He noted that the proposed development would substantially
impact traffic on Grand Avenue. He also pointed out
developers do not give away acreage in return for less.
Robert Broadny expressed opposition to Parcel Map No. 24031
for the following reasons: the proposed development will
increase traffic on Grand Avenue; the parcels have map
restrictions; the developer purchased the property knowing the
area was a green belt; the two proposals should not be linked
together. He stated that the City Council and the Planning
Commission should represent the interests of the residents,
not the developers.
Tricia Guber, residing at 24303 Rimford Place, expressed
opposition to Parcel Map No. 24031 for the following reasons:
the parcels have building restrictions; the proposal will
increase traffic and noise; and there has been enough
May 23, 1994 Page 8
development in the City. She stated that the City Council and
the Planning Commission should fully support the residents.
Sue Peg, residing at 24336 Rimford Place, and Astko Takada,
residing at. 24300 Rimford Place, expressed opposition to
Parcel Map No. 24031 for the same reasons expressed by Mrs.
Tricia Guber.
Craig Summers, a resident, Hero Wen, residing on 24328 Rimford
Place, and Gordon Guber, residing at 24303 Rimford Place,
expressed opposition to Parcel Map No. 24031 for the following
reasons: the parcels have building restrictions which should
not be lifted; the wildlife and open space should be
preserved; there are no benefits to the residents if the
restrictions are lifted; the development will increase
traffic, noise, litter, and pollution; the property was
purchased by a Council Member with the knowledge of the
established restrictions to preserve and protect the open
space, and sold to Mr. Forrestor who was fully aware of the
restrictions; and Diamond Bar became a City to stop
undesirable development.
Terry Birrell, a resident, expressed opposition to the South
Pointe Master Plan for the following reasons: it was approved
by the Planning Commission in 1993 in violation to planning
and zoning law; the South Pointe Master Plan is inconsistent
with the future adopted General Plan regarding open space
preservation and the desire to maintain deed and map
restrictions; the EIR is deficient in identifying cumulative
impacts; there are no acceptable overriding considerations
since the housing density negatively impacts the community and
increases traffic; the community desires an aesthetically
pleasing project that retains open space; the Lavandar Report
does not include the assumptions the conclusions were based
upon in regards to economic benefit, nor does it include such
information such as the current vacancy rate in the City, the
cannibalization implicit in the projections, and the sales and
sales tax per square foot numbers; the financial status of the
developers has not been properly investigated; the proposed
commercial site, owned by the City, may be subject to
landslides since it is fill; and there is no benefit to the
community by lifting either map restricted property.
Haji Dayala, residing on Knoll Court, a real estate broker,
expressed opposition to Parcel Map No. 24031. He stated that
developing the parcels will decrease home values by
approximately 15%. He then asked everyone in the audience to
stand up and state, "I am sick and tired of being pushed
around and I'm not going to take it anymore."
It is noted that everyone in the audience, which appeared to
be approximately 100 residents, stood up and repeated Mr.
Dayala's statement.
May 23, 1994
Page 9
Steve Nice, residing on Rising Star Drive, pointed out that
over 4,000 people signed both referendums to rescind the
General Plan in opposition to the position regarding open
space and map restrictions. He suggested that the Planning
Commission should listen to the people here tonight who are
expressing what they desire for their City. He expressed
support for allowing Mr. Arciero to develop in Sandstone
Canyon since his property does not have map restrictions, as
long as he develops in an environmentally sensitive manner.
He asked what the WWSD needs to do to get their EIR approved
by the City in order to move the dirt and construct the
school.
Max Maxwell, reminding the Planning Commission of the number
of recall signatures collected as well as the two successful
referendums, suggested that the Planning Commission take no
action on any of the alternatives and rescind their prior
recommendation regarding the South Pointe Master Plan. He
stated that the alternatives cut off the cougar corridor
restricting migration, which is detrimental to the existence
of cougars which often travel as far as 150 miles. He stated
that it is Mr. Arciero's responsibility to move the dirt in a
safe manner. He stated that Parcel Map No. 24031 should not
be discussed until after the adoption of a General Plan. He
expressed concern that his copy of the agenda packet did not
include overriding considerations, and that he is having
problem getting information from the City that he has
requested. He suggested that nothing be approved this evening
until a decision has been made regarding the ownership of the
Parcel Map No. 24031 property to determine if there is a
potential conflict of interest.
Charles Williams, residing on Rimford Place, opposed to Parcel
Map No. 24031, stated that the parcels on Grand Avenue is an
active wildlife area with a blue line stream that will require
a permit from the Department of Fish and Game to develop.He
stated that Jan Dabney indicated at a homeowners meeting that
they have every intent to develop the Grand Avenue parcels
regardless of the outcome of the South Pointe Master Plan. He
asked why staff was not directed to present a staff report
after the recess, as had been indicated. He then suggested
that the City utilize City On -Line by including Planning
Commission agendas.
RECESSED: Chair/Meyer recessed the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
RECONVENED: Chair/Meyer reconvened the meeting at 9:56 p.m.
Chair/Meyer requested a staff report on Parcel Map No. 24031.
AP/Searcy reported that the applicant, RnP Development, Inc.,
is requesting approval to merge two (2) existing parcels, Lot
1 of Tract No. 31479 and Lot 61 of Tract No. 42557 to one (1)
parcel totaling 68.10 acres, located south of Grand Avenue,
May 23, 1994 Page 10
west of Shotgun Lane and east of Summitridge Drive and extends
east to the San Bernardino County line, which would require
the City's abandonment of currently held Open Space and
Building Rights Restrictions on the newly created parcel. He
stated that the applicant is requesting that these approvals
be granted as a quid pro quo compensation for non -development
of a portion of the South Pointe site by the developer as
stipulated in Alternative No. 1 of the South Pointe project.
He reviewed the merits of the project as outlined in the staff
report.
Chair/Meyer invited the proponents of the project to come
forward and make a presentation.
Jan Dabney clarified that the application did not request
removal of any open space, or open space recorded easements
from Lot 1 or Lot 61, but rather the removal of building
restrictions on the property. He noted that the property is
not open space, but has a one hundred (100) foot open space
recorded easement to protect the view. He stated that the
restriction on the property is for residential buildings;
however, there are underlying uses for the property which the
owner does intend to utilize, even if it is not for
residential development. He pointed out that the canyon
property is privately owned and will be fenced and utilized at
the owners discretion. He stated that it is felt that the
development of the South Pointe Master Plan allows for a more
expansive use and community benefit by providing a park and a
passive open space; however, if the South Pointe Master Plan
is denied, there will be no parks and the property will be
fenced off. He stated that the property owners feel they have
been misrepresented by the community, and to have had to put
up with the abuse for three years has been intolerable. He
stated that the developers are asking for their right,
provided by law, to have consideration given to their
application.
C/Flamenbaum asked what benefit the City would derive by
removing the restrictions on the Grand Avenue site.
Jan Dabney stated that they will be back before the Planning
Commission regarding this site and most likely, through the
negotiations between now and then, the necessary benefit will
be derived to the surrounding owners.
In response to VC/Plunk's inquiry regarding possible
underlying uses, Jan Dabney stated that, though the property
is restricted from building residential developments, a good
allowable use for that facility could be an equestrian center.
Frank Arciero, Jr., responding to a statement made that
developers would never trade land of greater value for land of
lesser value, clarified that he had intended to point out that
the City has an opportunity to acquire some land that is
May 23, 1994
Page 11
currently privately owned, thus giving the City control over
it now and in the future, and not that there is a trade of
land of lesser value for more value. He pointed out that the
South Pointe property is privately owned, Mr. Schad should not
invite the community to visit the site because the community
does not have the right to trespass on the property, in
consideration of liability concerns.
C/Fong, realizing that Mr. Arciero does have the privilege to
build on his land with hopes of making a good profit and
return, inquired if he would be willing to restrict
development to the. eastern portion of the site and not
interfere with the existing blue line stream and oak trees on
the westerly portion of the property. He suggested that the
soil be moved from the South Pointe site down across the
stream to the easterly portion of the site, restricting
development to the easterly portion of the property.
Frank Arciero, Jr., stated that they have researched various
plans on how to develop the property with minimal disturbance.
He stated that there are geological problems and soil problems
associated with the property, and when the property is graded,
about 90% of it will be affected by the grading operation in
order to stabilize it. He pointed out that there are
landslides on the slopes adjacent to Brea Canyon, and that
moving the dirt into the canyon would fill the blue line
stream. He explained that it is impossible to move 425,000
cubic yards of dirt to the easterly portion of the property
because there -is not enough property to accommodate that
amount of dirt.
C/Fong inquired if Mr. Arciero has given consideration to
other alternatives for moving that dirt, such as using a
conveyor belt to haul it to the easterly portion of the site
or to Brea Canyon Road, thus not affecting the canyon.
Frank Arciero', Jr. stated that the only feasible alternative
since 1982 has been to take the dirt and move it into the
canyon. He reiterated that the easterly portion of the site
cannot accommodate 425,000 cubic yards of dirt because he
would not be able to get to the property from Brea Canyon to
develop that part of it. It could not be utilized unless
people are brought in by helicopter.
C/Fong reiterated his suggestion that the dirt be brought over
by a conveyor belt to the. easterly portion of the property, so
as not to impact the canyon, restricting development to only
that easterly portion of the property, thus preserving the
westerly portion of the property. He suggested that Mr.
Arciero and the WVUSD keep an open mind on other ways to move
the dirt, and consider developing the property by utilizing
other procedures perhaps not yet thought about. He suggested
that there be more engineering feasibility studies performed,
May 23, 1994 Page 12
and that a contractor be contacted to see the various kinds of
equipment available.
Frank Arciero, Jr. reiterated that he cannot develop the
easterly portion of the property by accepting the dirt on the
school site, nor can he afford to move the dirt off of the
site. He explained that the cheapest estimate he has received
to move the dirt by truck loads off of the property was over
$1 million, and to convey it over to the easterly portion of
the property first before removing it by trucks would be even
more cost prohibitive. He stated that he would be willing to
listen to any new ideas on how'to move the dirt, in a cost
effective manner, to develop the property.
C/Fong stated that he is attempting to find a solution that
accommodates the construction of the school, saves the canyon,
and allows development. He suggested that he and Mr. Arciero
discuss the issue at another time during a work session.
Mr. Patel stated that he has not received any objections to
his development, nor does he have a problem with the cut and
fill process, or with oak trees on the site.
C/Fong stated that he met with Mr. Patel on May 16, 1994 to
view his property. He pointed out that a blue line stream
runs across Mr. Patel's property and that there are several
oak trees along the stream. He stated that he was under the
impression that Mr. Patel's property also has building
restrictions allowing only 3 dwelling units; therefore, his
proposal of 23 homes is inconsistent with the draft General
Plan.
Haji Dayala pointed out that $1 million to move the dirt is
not an extreme expense when compared to the amount of homes to
be constructed. He pointed out that the cost of the removal
of the dirt can easily be added to the cost of the homes,
which would be about $5,000 per home.
Max Makwell expressed concern that Mr. Patel had indicated to
him earlier in the evening that there were no restrictions on
his property, when actual there is.
CDD/DeStefano explained that currently Mr. Patel's property is
restricted to 3 homes; however, the Planning Commission made
a recommendation to the City Council to lift that restriction
to accommodate his proposal in conjunction with the South
Pointe Master Plan, which is before the City Council for
consideration.
A resident pointed out that Diamond Bar became a City to
control such development as the ones being proposed. He
expressed concern that Mr. Forrestor has never constructed
homes before, and the City should be cautious considering he
has no track record. He stated that many of the neighbors
May 23, 1994 Page 13
have expressed opposition to Mr. Patel Is proposed development,
contrary to what he has indicated.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer closed
the meeting and returned the matter to the Planning Commission
for consideration.
C/Flamenbaum made the following comments: there seems to be
a trade off of environmental damage from one area to another
with Alternative No. 1; Alternative No. 1 would exacerbate
traffic conditions in an area already highly impacted; there
is no real public benefit to the City with removing the
restrictions on Parcel Map No. 24031; and there appears to be
no real public benefit with Alternative No. 1 as compared to
what is already offered in conjunction with the South Pointe
Master Plan.
VC/Plunk expressed her opinion that it is ill advised to
proceed with Parcel Map No. 24031 based upon the information
presented before the Planning Commission.
C/Fong stated that, based upon what can be anticipated with
the General Plan, there is to be no lifting of restrictions on
open space; therefore, approving Parcel Map No. 24031 would be
contrary to the draft General Plan.
VC/Plunk inquired if it is appropriate to assume that there
will be absolutely no lifting of restrictions forever, if such
as provision is indicated in the General Plan.
ICA/Montgomery stated that if there is a vote of the people
determining there will never be a lifting of restrictions,
then the only way a restriction can be lifted is by another
vote of the people. He stated that if the General Plan
indicates that restrictions are not to be lifted, a City
Council could amend the General Plan unless the General Plan
went to ballot, then the lifting of restrictions would require
a vote of the people.
C/Fong expressed opposition to lifting current restrictions on
Parcel Map No. 24031.
Chair/Meyer made the following comments: since there is no
General Plan, making the required findings of fact that the
subdivision is consistent with the General Plan is impossible
to do; Lot Nos. 1 & 61 were given restrictions for a purpose
in terms of view preservation and open space enjoyment in
regards to the Brock subdivision; and there appears to be no
public benefit to lifting the restrictions.
Moved by C/Flamenbaum and seconded by VC/Plunk to adopt a
resolution recommending denial of Parcel Map No. 24031, as
amended by the Community Development Director.
May 23, 1994 Page 14
CDD/DeStefano made the following amendments to the Resolution
of Denial: change the heading on page 1 to read, " A
Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond
Bar Recommending to City Council Denial of Parcel Map No.
24031..."; replace the word "Director" with "Planning
Commission" as indicated on page 2, subsection B.2.; insert
finding (i) on page 3 to read, "Based upon substantial
evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above
referenced public hearing, and upon specific findings
presented herein, the Planning Commission concludes that it
cannot find conformity with Government Code Sections 51093 and
65874 regarding abandonment of the open space easement."; and
reword subsection 3. on page 4 to read, "Based upon ...this
Commission hereby recommends the City Council deny the
application for Parcel Map No. 24031 and abandonment of the
existing open space easements and building rights
restrictions."
The Motion Carried 4-0-1 with the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fong, Flamenbaum, VC/Plunk and
Chair/Meyer
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Schad
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Chair/Meyer asked the Planning Commission to provide comments
regarding the alternatives presented with the South Pointe
Master Plan.
C/Flamenbaum stated that the Planning Commission approved the
South Pointe Master Plan last year under the rules and laws in
effect when it was first proposed to the City, and based upon
the benefit received by the City from the project; however, it
appears the current motivation of the City Council and the
general public is to preserve as much of the canyon as
possible. He stated that the City Council has the
capabilities to preserve the vast majority of the canyon by
deeding a portion of its acreage to the public for the purpose
of a secondary road on the north side of the canyon, thus
preserving the southern portion of the canyon, and by reducing
the density within the proposed tract maps. He then made the
following comments: Alternative No. 1 is unacceptable as
indicated previously; Alternative No. 2 has no real benefit
because the canyon would be impacted once the dirt is moved
around; and there has not been any viable solution offered for
the removal of the dirt. He pointed out that the original
South Pointe Master Plan proposal contains all the parameters
needed for the City Council to deliberate and approve the
project.
VC/Plunk stated that, since the original approval last year,
she now feels that the public benefit of lifting the
May 23, 1994 Page 15
restrictions on the SASAK was not demonstrated to her
satisfaction.
C/Fong stated that Alternative No. 1 is no longer an option
based upon the decision made regarding Parcel Map No. 24031.
He stated that Mr. Arciero has the right to develop his land,
as indicated in Alternative No. 2; however, he must respect
the City's desires to preserve the canyon and the WVUSD's
desire to construct the middle school. He stated that if the
Sasak property is developed, and the restrictions lifted, the
blue line stream should be preserved, the oak trees saved, and
there should be minimal grading on the land so that the
development is an asset to the community. He stated that the
restrictions should not be lifted on the RnP property, unless
a plan is developed that would enhance the community and not
take away from it, leaving as much open space as desired by
the City.
C/Flamenbaum, noting that RnP can erect a 6 foot high block
wall around their property and grade (weed abate) the property
until it is bare, leaving the City with nothing, pointed out
that the recommendation made by the Planning Commission does
at least provide the City with some benef it in return to
allowing some development. He then recommended that
Alternative Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 be rejected as a
recommendation to the City Council, and that the City Council
consider his recommendation of Alternative No. 6 as follows:
construct the RnP project and the Arciero project as proposed,
to exclude the commercial and park development, and moving the
road to the north half of the canyon under the Arciero
property line, but on City property, utilizing the bottom half
of the canyon as a City owned park or open space.
Chair/Meyer noted that the direction of the City Council was
to discuss the Alternatives, and that there is no need to
reach a consensus on the issue.
VC/Plunk pointed out that private property cannot be
considered a "park" for the community's use. She expressed
her opinion that Alternative No. 2 needs further modification
to include commercial development.
Chair/Meyer pointed out that the community seems to desire all
the benefits of urban services, but not development or growth
that goes along with it. He stated that the benefits of
urbanization and preservation are difficult to measure and
require compromising on everyone's part. He expressed his
opinion that the benefit of active recreational areas for
children, as well as passive open space, was well balanced
with the urbanization of commercial and residential
development offered within the South Pointe Master Plan, which
offered a revenue source to create and pay for the urban
services desired and demanded by the community. He stated
that the alternatives offered have more problems than the
May 23, 1994 Page 16
original proposal. He expressed support for the Planning
Commission's original recommendation.
Chair/Meyer noted that there is consensus of the Planning
Commission that Alternative No. 1 is not a viable
recommendation based upon the recommendation made on Parcel
Map No. 24031, and that there is no consensus of the Planning
Commission on the other alternatives.
Moved by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by C/Fong and carried
unanimously to direct staff to provide a report for the City
Council's review summarizing the Planning Commission's
comments made this evening.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by C/Fong and carried unanimously
to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 11:28 p.m.
Respectfully,
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ David Meyer
David Meyer
Chairman
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
JUNE 130 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. in the AQMD
Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Meyer.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Meyer; vice Chairwoman Plunk;
Commissioners: Flamenbaum, and Schad.
Commissioner Fong arrived at 7:13 p.m.
Also Present: Associate Planner Rob Searcy; Assistant
Planner Ann Lungu; Interim City Attorney
Michael Montgomery; Engineer Mike Myers;
Senior Engineer David Liu; and Contract
Recording Secretary Liz Myers
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of May 23, 1994
VC/Plunk requested that the minutes of May 23, 1994 be amended
to indicate the proper spelling of Terry Birrell.
Moved by C/Schad, seconded by C/Fong and carried unanimously
to approve the minutes of May 23, 1994, as amended.
NEN BUSINESS
2. Review of Fiscal Year 94-95 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
for Conformity with the General Plan Pursuant to Section 65401
of the Government Code
VC/Plunk suggested, and the Planning Commission concurred,
that the intersection of Quail Summit and Diamond Bar
Boulevard be added to the list of warrant studies for traffic
signals.
Chair/Meyer opened the meeting and invited those wishing to
speak to come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer closed the
meeting and returned the matter to the Planning Commission for
consideration.
June 13, 1994 Page 2
Chair/Meyer requested clarification how the Planning
Commission can find the CIP to be in conformity with the
General Plan without an adopted General Plan.
ICA/Montgomery, noting item B.3(c) of the Resolution requires
the proposed projects to comply with all other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinances, regulations
and standards, stated that the letter of extension from the
Office of Planning and Research (OPR) for the General Plan
allows for such a finding.
C/Schad suggested that the Community Services staff
investigate ways to prevent vandalism of the lighting at Maple
Hill Park.
Chair/Meyer questioned the appropriateness of so many traffic
signals on Diamond Bar Boulevard in consideration of the
existing traffic congestion problem.
SE/Liu explained that the intent of the list pertains strictly
to warrant studies to make a determination regarding the needs
of the listed locations. He stated that staff will make a
recommendation to the City Council to consider three traffic
signals for this coming fiscal year.
In response to C/Schad, SE/Liu.stated that staff is currently
working with the City of Pomona and the County regarding the
synchronization of traffic signals on Diamond Bar Boulevard.
VC/Plunk suggested, and the Planning Commission concurred,
that the CIP list include the beautification of the City Entry
Signs with appropriate landscaping.
Moved by VC/Plunk, seconded by C/Schad and carried unanimously
to adopt a resolution recommending approval of the CIP list,
as amended.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
3. Conditional Use Permit No. 93-4 and Development Review No.
93-1
As'tP/Lungu presented the staff report regarding the request
made by the applicant, Dr. Akbar Omar, for approval of
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) NO. 93-4 to allow grading within
a hillside management area, to allow live entertainment, and
to allow the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic
beverages in the C -M; and approval of, Administrative
Development Review (ADR) No. 93-1 to allow the construction of
a restaurant at the property location of 21671 E. Gateway
Drive, Diamond Bar. She then reviewed the revisions made to
the project proposed at the January 24, 1994 Planning
Commission continued public hearing, as outlined in the staff
report. She showed a rendering to the Commission illustrating
June 13, 1994
Page 3
the materials proposed for the project. It is recommended
that the Planning Commission approve CUP No. 93-4 and ADR No.
93-1, Findings of Fact, and conditions, as listed within the
resolution.
As'tP/Lungu, in response to C/Schad's inquiries, made the
following responses: the proposal can be modified requiring
the uplighting of the trees proposed; signage, which is not
proposed at this time, would most likely be located at the
front and backside of the restaurant; a lighting plan will
need to be submitted; and access from the restaurant to the
hotel is not provided because of the steep grade, and because
the applicant did not receive concurrence from Radisson Hotel.
In response to C/Fong's inquiries, As'tP/Lungu stated that the
balconies have been eliminated because the parking lot cannot
accommodate the needed parking spaces for the additional
seating that could be provided by the balconies. She stated
that the retaining wall will be landscaped.
AP/Searcy, in response to Chair/Meyer, stated that staff will
prepare a mitigation monitoring program, if needed for the
mitigated negative declaration, subsequent to the approval of
the project.
As'tP/Lungu, in response to VC/Plunk, stated that a conceptual
landscape plan will be reviewed by RJM to assure the proposed
landscaping is appropriate for the area.
Chair/Meyer declared the public hearing open and invited those
wishing to speak to come forward.
Syed Raza, representing the applicant, expressed his
concurrence to the conditions listed in the staff report, and
the changes suggested by the Planning Commission pertaining to
lighting and landscaping.
C/Schad suggested that trees larger than 15 gallon be
considered to softened the architectural impact of the wall.
VC/Plunk suggested that the applicant consider planting vines
on the wall to soften the visual impact.
Chair/Meyer suggested that it may be more appropriate to plant
more moderate to fast growing trees rather than large trees
because their rate of survival are better and are least
costly.
Syed Raza stated that there was discussion with the architect
of painting the wall a darker shade to blend with the
foreground, along with landscaping, making the two story
building on top of it appear to be a floating structure.
June 13, 1994
Page 4
VC/Plunk suggested that the balcony be used as a planter
rather than seating..
Syed Raza stated that the balconies, which were omitted
because of the lack of parking spaces, are now replaced with
a slope roof that is part of the building. He noted that the
balconies were quite large for just planting, and patrons
could still use them for seating, which may create a problem
for the City.
C/Fong inquired if the landscaped area on the west side could
be used for parking.
Syed Raza explained that, because of the steepness of the
slope and existing sanitary lines, consideration of utilizing
the west side for additional parking is economically
impractical.
In response to C/Fong, Syed Raza stated that the landscaping
on the slopes are intended to prevent erosion due to runoff.
He also stated that the grade is designed to assure that
runoff is directed to the street and away from the building,
and gutters and drainage patterns are included in the design
of the building as well.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer closed
the public hearing and returned the matter to the Planning
Commission for consideration.
C/Flamenbaum made the following comments: condition the
project to plant ivy on all the large walls as well as the
retaining walls to hinder graffiti; include an accommodation
for future access to the hotel in their plan so that if, in
future years, an agreement is attained, a location has already
been designated; and modify condition p., on page 6, that
security should be coordinated with the hotel so it is not the
entire burden of the restaurant.
Chair/Meyer made the following comments: the balcony is a
desirable addition to the project, particularly since there is
a significant view corridor, and it seems inappropriate for
vehicles to dictate the design constraints of a building; and
the parking standards can be modified through the CUP to allow
the balconies, perhaps requiring a trip reduction plan as a
mitigation measure for additional parking.
AP/Searcy, concern with C/Flamenbaum's direction to provide
accomodations for a future access, noted that, because of the
change in elevation, it will be difficult to provide access
between the two lots.
C/Flamenbaum stated that it would seem prudent to accommodate
an area for a potential pedestrian access between the two lots
June 13, 1994
Page 5
in case circumstances change in the future for whatever
reason.
Syed Raza stated that the two owners of the properties have
not been able to come to any kind of agreement due to
liability concerns. He also stated that because the slope is
on the hotel side and not the restaurant side, it is
inappropriate for the applicant to include plans without their
concurrence.
The Planning Commission concurred that providing for future
access is not feasible.
Moved by C/Schad, seconded by VC/Plunk and carried unanimously
to approve CUP No. 93-4 and ADR No. 93-1, Findings of Fact,
and conditions, as listed in the resolution, with the
following amendments: a mitigation monitoring program to
include the grading, treatment of the walls, and the
landscaping; a condition addressing lighting and the glare;
balconies can remain at the option of the applicant, with the
submittal of a trip reduction plan to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and Community Development Director; modify the
condition to allow for a two year permit; and change the
security provision to 10:00 p.m.
RECESS: Chair/Meyer recessed the meeting at 8:07 p.m.
RECONVENED: Chair/Meyer reconvened the meeting at 8:14 p.m.
4. Zone Change No. 92-2, vesting Tentative Map No. 51169,
Conditional Use Permit No. 92-3, Oak Tree Permit No. 92-3, and
Environmental Impact Report No. 92-2
AP/Searcy presented the staff report regarding the request
made by the applicant, Jerry Yeh, for approval of a 13 unit
single family subdivision on a 20 acre site located in
Significant Ecological Area (SEA) No. 15, and for the removal
of one oak tree, a zone change to bring the project into
conformance with the General Plan (1992), and the
certification of the environmental document. He then reviewed
the recommendations outlined in the Final Report of the
Significant Ecological Area Technical Advisory Committee
(SEATAC) that met to discuss the biota report contained within
the Draft EIR. It is recommended that the Planning Commission
open the public hearing and receive comments on the draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and project entitlement
requests, continue the public hearing and direct staff as
appropriate.
Mr. Smith, the City's environmental consultant from Michael
Brandmen Associates, briefly reviewed the chronology and
process of the EIR documentation for the project, as required
by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as
the responses received to the EIR. He stated that the issues
June 13, 1994 Page 6
addressed in the EIR, which relate to geology and soils,
drainage and water quality, biological impacts, noise,
transportation, circulation, public services, and land use,
including aesthetics, can be mitigated to a level less than
significant, with the exception of the biology impacts. He
stated that the EIR recommends mitigation measures for the
loss of the Walnuts on site and other associated impacts to
wildlife, which is summarized in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for those impacts. He explained that SEATAC suggested
some on site mitigation measures for some of the impacts of
the Walnuts from development of the project, with the balance
of the impacts to be mitigated either through an in lieu fee
contribution to a conservancy, or through the development of
appropriate habitat within SEA #15 at another location.
Chair/Meyer requested clarification if C/Schad has a conflict
of interest in the deliberation of the project as it pertains
to his conservancy.
ICA/Montgomery asked C/Schad if he would derive a personal
financial benefit from any contribution or mitigation payment
that might be incurred herein, which does not include
reimbursed expenses.
C/Schad stated for the record that he has no plans to extract
any funds for personal use from his conservancy, and that any
funds acquired for his conservancy has been utilized strictly
for the conservancy. He stated that he would not be impacted
economically personally in any manner whatsoever if his
conservancy is chosen to help monitor and manage the subject
property.
ICA/Montgomery stated that, unless there is any evidence to
the contrary, C/Schad's declaration qualifies him to continue
participating in the deliberations and to vote on the matter.
AP/Searcy reported that 5 or 6 conservancies were reviewed and
not one of them has been designated; however, SEATAC felt it
may be appropriate to have a local agency controlling the
money.
Chair/Meyer expressed concern that, though legally there is no
conflict of interest, perceptually it seems inappropriate for
a Planning Commissioner to advocate before SEATAC for a
revenue source to be given to his conservancy, and then be in
a position now of reviewing and making recommendations on the
project.
C/Schad stated that it is not important which conservancy
manages and monitors the subject property, but rather to
preserve as much of the natural resources as possible, in the
most proper manner.
June 13, 1994
Page 7
ICA/Montgomery stated that it is appropriate to endorse
programs as long as personal income or personal economic
benefit is not received.
VC/Plunk, noting that the community has expressed concern with
intertwined relationships involving City issues, stated that
there is a perception of a conflict of interest, particularly
since C/Schad is president of the conservancy.
C/Schad pointed out that the officers of his conservancy are
presidents of other conservancy, creating an interlocking
relationship among conservancies. He stated that his interest
in this type of management is trails for children, working
with schools for educational purposes, planning programs for
plant propagation in the future, etc.
C/Flamenbaum suggested that, in order to resolve an appearance
of impropriety, perhaps it would be appropriate if the Tonner
Canyon conservancy not accept any money from this land owner.
ICA/Montgomery stated that, as long as C/Schad is willing to
confront any political attacks or criticism regarding the
conservancy, it is not necessary for him to make such a
statement.
Mr. Smith, in response to C/Flamenbaum, showed the location of
the intermittent blue line stream, as represented on the map,
as well as the location of the oak tree, the vacant single
family home, and the Schabaurum trail.
C/Schad suggested that the feasibility of propagating new
plants from nut or seed of the Black Walnut, to be placed on
the blue line area, be investigated. He requested that the
project be conditioned to require the applicant to submit a
landscaping plan for the relocation and propagation of trees,
to be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
VC/Plunk suggested that perhaps the mitigation measures for
agricultural or recent and man made vegetation should be
different than the mitigation measures required for long term,
natural state vegetation.
C/Schad requested that there be an investigation to determine
if the existing oak tree is a hybrid, and if it can be
relocated near the area of origination by the side of the
intermitted blue line stream.
Chair/Meyer declared the public hearing open and invited those
wishing to speak to come forward.
Lex Williman, Planning Director from Hunsaker & Associates,
representing Jerry Yeh, gave a brief history of the project,
the concept plans considered, and the studies conducted prior
to submittal. He explained that all of "The Country Estates"
June 13, 1994 Page 8
standards have been used for the development, with the intent
to annex into "The Country" with separate CC&R's, utilizing
land form grading, undulation, and hillside management. He
reviewed the proposal as submitted, reviewing the relocation
of easements, the blue line stream, the replacement and
relocation of trees, biological impacts and mitigation
measures, and grading techniques. He expressed concurrence
with the conditions of approval as listed in the staff report,
as well as the suggestions made by the Planning Commission.
In response to C/Flamenbaum, Lex Williman explained that the
slope easements were dedicated to the County with the intent
of allowing for construction of a road. He stated that they
will definitely annex to "The Country", which requires paying
a fee; however, there will be a separate Homeowners
Association and specific CC&R's, in conformance with "The
Country's" CC&Rls, as well as special assessments pertinent to
the 13 lots, such as for the pump station maintained by the
County. He stated that the urban pollution basin will be
fenced off to protect wildlife.
Lex Williman, in response to C/Fong, stated that the intent of
the mitigation in the landscape plan is to mix a variety of
plant species with the natural habitat in the area to get back
some biological significance on the site.
C/Schad inquired how the blue line runoff from the residences
to the canyon will be filtered and circulated back to the
ground. He expressed concern that any runoff into the canyon
will cause irreversible damage.
Lex Williman stated that either the evaporated method could be
used, or pipes with holes could run under the detention basin
so the affluent will drain through the ground, into the pipes
and down the canyon.
C/Flamenbaum left the meeting at 9:30 p.m. and returned at
9:34 p.m.
VC/Plunk suggested that the Boy Scouts of America (BSA), the
affected property owner, be verbally contacted regarding the
easement for the road to Tonner Canyon. She asked for a
definition of "esocormic growth" when the project is brought
back before the Planning Commission. She suggested that, if
a 2:1 replacement ratio standard is desired after five years,
it may be advisable to start with a slightly higher
replacement ratio.
Mr. Smith explained that there are provisions in the five year
monitoring program to manage the mitigation, replacing trees
to assure that the desired ratio is achieved at the end of the
monitoring period as well as monitoring the understory.
June 13, 1994 Page 9
AP/Searcy, in response to VC/Plunk, stated that, in order for
the project to be in conformance with the rest of the "The
Country", there are no street lights included in the proposal.
Lex Williman, in response to Chair/Meyer's inquiries, made the
following responses: they have the authority to do off-site
grading and off-site street improvements for the adjacent
property, which will be shown on the final map as an easement
for access purposes, with slopes, utilities, et al; there will
be an assessment district to pay for the sewer system, which
will be adequately sized for the development and maintained by
the County; 184,000 cubic yards of dirt from grading will be
balanced on site; the fill material adjacent to the site,
intruding on the Blaze Trail easement by no action of Mr. Yeh,
will be removed by the applicant; and a landscape plan will
come back before the Planning Commission.
Chair/Meyer stated that page A-1, of the Response to Comment
document, should be amended to properly indicate that the
review period of the DEIR was through November 1993 ending
December 1993. He then requested clarification of the
response received from the EPA, which appeared vague.
Mr. Smith stated that the response from EPA, which is
considered a boilerplate letter, indicated that, since there
are no significant impacts in solid waste, no mitigation is
required. He concurred with Chair/Meyer that a more
appropriate additional response to the EPA is to indicate that
the area will be subject to the City's AB939 response program.
In response to Chair/Meyer, AP/Searcy stated that the Planning
Commission has the discretion to direct staff to place
additional mitigation measures for traffic impacts in the
mitigation monitoring program.
In response to Chair/Meyer, CE/Myers stated that the concern
regarding the capacity to treat the sewage emanating from the
project has been adequately answered; however, the concern if
the local sewers are adequate to convey the sewage from the
project to be treat has not yet been answered. He stated that
the project can be conditioned to provide area capacity
studies, prior to final approval of the map, to assure that
all the routes to treatment are adequate.
VC/Plunk stated that the funding for off-site mitigation
should go to the Parks and Recreation Department as so
indicated.
In response to Chair/Meyer's inquiry regarding the City
Engineer's comment on page C-9, of the Response to Comment
document, CE/Myers expressed his satisfaction that, in the
areas absolutely relevant, the EIR was prepared adequately.
He explained that his comments were referring to minor errors
June 131 1994
i�
June 13, 1994
.o
I
I
I
1
1
1
�oL
love 73. IM
Page io
,gas 7o
June 13, 1994
Page 10
not relevant to the entire EIR document, nor intended to be
included in the Response to Comment document
the certified engineer and geologist employed
John Lipman, stated geology on the site
with Triad e,Geotechnical,
with a posy possible problem ton lot #2 which will be
is favorable, with a p
properly monitored and stabilized as necessary.
Flamenbaum, John Lipman stated that there
In response to C/ slippage potential on site, and the
does not appear to be any that no
rock is hard and quite snabancient landsle. He lides des on the ds evidence
as
been found indicating any
in response to C/Fang's concern that the test
John Lipman, depth of about 10 to 12 feet deep, stated
pits were of limited dep favorable condition over
that the geology indicates a very
all, and nothing implies that a condition could be burse
below those depths requiring major subsurface work. He
potential
that the east side, the only side that has a P ood;
problem, has neutral bedding, which is still considered good;
the will be removing more than they will be gr
however, Y rove the stability of the slope
as far as fill, which will imp
in general.
Maxent Twig, made the following
ax Maxwell, residing at 3211
comments: there should f ture rdevelopmentf in h TonnereCanyon7
is being reserved for the
required to submit a proposal with more
there should be an
attempt to relocate the 167 Beds to be
developer should b q reserved; there n
specificity; SEA #15 should be P potential landslides; the
further investigation regards ort C/Schad's conservancy; and
Planning Commission should Supp
to 24" of top soil should be scraped an
the f irst 18" of the trees .
stockpiled to be used in the replanting
Lex Williman stated their willingness to preserve the black
earth, as suggested by Mr. Maxwell.
John Lipman, in response to C/Fong
's inquiry regarding the
west of Gold Rock Lane, stated that a small failure
topography on down the slope, but it is note ain the
was found way
disturbance to the area or a threat to the slop
vicinity.
stated that the preliminary soils and geological
AP/Searcy dj acent property, submitted to the
technical report for the aan soils or geotechnical
City for review, did not identify Y
problems that may effect this project or the adjacent project.
CE/Myers stated that staff can include conditions requiring
nical problems, or dedication
mitigation of adverse geotechto be prohibited
restricted use areas and building rightsdto
to
assure
the City. He stated that it can also be conermission to go on
that the MoU not only grants the applicant p
June 13, 1994 Page 11
to the adjacent property owner to do grading work for the
road, but also allows them to go further on to the property if
other conditions are uncovered, under City staff supervision,
inspection, and approval.
C/Fong stated that, for this project, the reports and
conditions are satisfactory; however, for future projects, the
City Engineering Department should review the geological maps;
and the soils and geological report, in respect to the
property beyond the property line.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chair/Meyer closed
the public hearing and returned the matter to the Planning
Commission for consideration.
C/Fong requested a written report from the geological engineer
responding to the condition of potential off-site geological
conditions that could impact this site or the adjacent
property, as well as an expanded geotechnical report that
would include some of the off-site areas that would be subject
to grading.
C/Schad requested that the project be conditioned to
preserving the black earth to be used for replanting.
C/Flamenbaum requested further information regarding the pump.
station. .
Moved by C/Schad and seconded by C/Fong to direct staff to
preparing resolutions recommending conditional approval of the
project, the CUP, and certification of the EIR.
The Motion Carried 5-0 with the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fong, Schad, Flamenbaum, VC/Plunk
and Chair/Meyer
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Moved by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by C/Schad and carried
unanimously to direct staff to bring back the resolutions for
the July 11, 1994 meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - None
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
C/Flamenbaum reported that he will be absent at the June 27, 1994
meeting due to a conflict in vacation schedules.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
June 13, 1994 Page 12
AP/Searcy reported that it is anticipated that GPAC will conclude
their review of the General Plan the end of June 1994. He stated
that the document will be brought before the Planning Commission
for review two meetings a week for joint sessions with the City
Council.
VC/Plunk expressed concern that joint sessions are not productive.
She suggested that the Planning Commission review each Element
before passing it on to the City Council with a recommendation.
C/Flamenbaum expressed objection to conducting two meetings a week,
and only being allowed one month in the review process, which took
GPAC 6 months.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/Schad, seconded by C/Flamenbaum and carried unanimously
to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Respectfully,
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Secretary
Attest:
Is/ David Meyer
David Meyer
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
APRIL 14, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ortiz called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. at the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Hearing Room, 21865 East
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner
Gravdahl.
ROLL CALL
Chair/Ortiz indicated that C/Chavers would be absent and excused
from tonight's meeting and C/Esposito would be arriving a few
minutes late.
Commissioners: Gravdahl, Vice Chairman Istik, and Chairman Ortiz.
Staff: Senior Engineer, David Liu; Administrative
Assistant, Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings,
and Engineering Secretary, Linda Smith.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting of March 10, 1994
Chair/Ortiz asked staff to give a brief overview of the minute
preparation procedure.
C/Esposito arrived at 6:35 p.m.
SE/Liu reported that the preparation of the minutes is the
responsibility of the Secretary. The minutes consist of a
clear, concise statement of every action including the motions
made and the vote on them. Any changes in the minutes can be
made by Commission action. Approved minutes are forwarded to
the City Council for their information.
C/Istik asked if all motions are reflected and paraphrased in
the minutes.
SE/Liu reiterated that a clear, concise statement is prepared
of each matter discussed. However, the Commission's comments
are welcome and can be incorporated into the final minutes.
The minutes presented are draft and do not become official
until approved by the Commission.
C/Istik requested that all motions, even those not passed, be
incorporated in the minutes.
April 14, 1994 Page 2
Chair/Ortiz asked if the tapes are kept for a year and if
approved minutes could be amended or additional information
added by the Commission within that year. Chair/Ortiz also
wanted to know who listens to the tapes, and who prepares and
has input in the preparation of the minutes..
SE/Liu responded that the tapes are kept for one year and can
be reviewed to confirm that the minutes reflect the true
intent of the Commission's actions in the form of clear,
concise statements. The tapes are reviewed by the Recording
Secretary, Linda Smith. Linda then prepares clear., concise
statements reflecting the speaker's intent and the
Commission's actions. He commented that he is fully
responsible for the preparation of the minutes and reviews the
tapes as necessary. His role is to see that the minutes
convey clear and concise statements of the meeting.
Moved by C/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Esposito and carried
unanimously to approve the minutes of March 10, 1994, as
presented.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES: Esposito, Gravdahl, VC/Istik and Chair Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS
C/Gravdahl reported that he will be absent at the May 12, 1994,
Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting.
VC/Istik asked staff to look into the traffic detector loops and
their alignment with the striping at Sunset Crossing Road and
Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Chair/Ortiz asked for a report from Sgt. Rawlings regarding the
parking problem at Lorbeer Junior High School.
Sgt. Rawlings responded that the Sheriffs Department has been made
aware of the problem. All schools have similar difficulties at
start-up and drop-off times, and the officers have been instructed
to try to be at one of the schools at those times. Also, the
motorcycle officers have been on training assignment, so their
presence has been less than in the past.
C/Esposito commented that the existing red curbs are not effective
because•people still continue to park and double parking is also
apparent. She asked if the red curbs could be eliminated so that
only the enforcement of the double parking violation would be
necessary.
April 14, 1994 Page 3
SE/Liu responded that the red curbs possibly are faded and staff
will see that they become visible. However, if elimination of a
red curb is at issue then a re-evaluation of the site would be
necessary.
C/Gravdahl asked if "No Stopping" signs accompanied the red curbs.
SE/Liu responded that he could not recall the signs on the site but
recommended that this item be brought back to the commission as an
agenda item for discussion.
Sgt. Rawlings reminded the Commission that parking at red curbs and
double parking is not unique to Lorbeer Junior High School, but is
common to all schools and is a recurring problem.
Chair/Ortiz asked about "Loading and Unloading Zones."
Sgt. Rawlings responded that the titles did not seem to make a
significant difference. His Department is still asked for
enforcement of the signs where those signs are placed.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ken Anderson, 2628 Rising Star Drive, thanked the Commission for
the Fountain Springs Drive/Shadow Canyon Drive/Diamond Bar
Boulevard signals, and the improvements scheduled for the area.
SE/Liu commented that the City Council at their last meeting
awarded the contract for the signalization on Diamond Bar Boulevard
at Fountain Springs Drive and Shadow Canyon Drive to Macadee
Electric Company. The preconstruction meeting will be scheduled
within a few weeks, and the construction should start shortly
thereafter.
Oscar Law, 25011 Pathfinder Road, commented that the signal at
Evergreen Springs Drive and Pathfinder Road has a five-minute cycle
for those on Evergreen Springs Drive. Also, he asked why the City
is paying for the signal at Shadow Canyon Drive.
C/Gravdahl responded that the signal on Diamond Bar Boulevard at
Shadow Canyon Drive is a shared cost signal for the safety of all
citizens of Diamond Bar. He explained that the intersection is a
T -intersection coming from a private street, but the thoroughfare
is public and the signalization is for the welfare of those
traveling the thoroughfare. Funds for Diamond Bar thoroughfares
come from the gas tax paid by all residents. In the case of the
Shadow Canyon Drive Signal, the private developer in "The Country"
paid the fair -share of the signal costs.
SE/Liu commented that the Commission developed a policy for funding
traffic signals at private and public street intersections which
was subsequently adopted by the City Council. The policy provides
the guidelines for development projects and the fair -share
April 14, 1994
Page 4
contribution to be set aside towards public improvements at
public/private street intersections.
Bob Quartucy, 21446 Broken Arrow Drive, President of The Diamond
Bar Senior Citizens Club, commented that there are only two
handicapped parking spaces at Heritage Park Community Center which
is inadequate when they are having a meeting at the center. A
voluntary survey of the attendees of the last meeting indicated
that twenty of those attending possessed handicapped stickers, and
the spaces are only adequate for 10% of the members attending. He
would like to see temporary handicapped parking provisions be
provided on their meeting days (Tuesdays).
Chair/Ortiz presented copies to the Commission of a random sampling
of seventeen members' signatures holding handicapped stickers at
the last meeting, and forwarded the original to the Secretary of
the Commission.
Michael Schneider, 1100 Pebblewood Drive, expressed that he would
like to have through traffic diverted from Grand Avenue to Chino
Hills Parkway for users headed from Chino Hills to and from the
SR -57 Freeway. He would like to see the Chino Hills Parkway in
Diamond Bar changed to 55 miles per hour; the signal light at the
intersection of Chino Hills Parkway and Chino Avenue not to trip to
red for cars wanting to make right turns from Chino Avenue or at
least a 30 -second delay; the left -turn loops from Chino Hills
Parkway should not trip red lights; and three lanes in each
direction, to encourage traffic to go around Diamond Bar. At
Longview Drive and Grand Avenue the signal light should also be
timed to discourage through traffic.
SE/Liu commented that the Grand, Avenue Traffic Signal
Synchronization Project would enable drivers the ability to travel
a major road without stopping during peak hours. The design and
data collection are in process by the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR - None
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Amendment of Resolution No. 93-05 entitled "No Right -Turn,
4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday".
AA/Aberra reported that Resolution No. 93-05 was adopted by
the City Council on February 2, 1993, to install the "No
Right -Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on
Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue.
The Walnut Valley Unified School District is requesting its
school buses be exempted from this right -turn restriction.
The District currently provides transportation services to
Quail Summit Elementary School which. is located in the Rolling
Knoll Road/Country View Drive area.
April 14, 1994
B.
Page 5
Staff is requesting the Traffic and Transportation Commission
to review this matter and recommend to the City Council to
amend Resolution No. 93-05 to read "No Right -Turn, 4:00 p.m. -
7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday, Except School Buses".
Clyde Evans, Director of Transportation of the Walnut Valley
Unified School District, reported that the timing for the
District's routes in the area coincides with the present
posting and asked that school buses be exempt from the
restriction.
C/Gravdahl asked the procedure for the exemption to the
Resolution, the number of buses involved, and if the Los
Angeles County Sheriffs Department had any concerns.
SE/Liu responded that if the recommendation goes forward to
the City Council then staff would ask the City Council to
amend the previously adopted Resolution No. 93-05 to make the
exception for School Buses. This would enable staff to place
"Except School Buses" signs directly below the existing signs.
Clyde Evans responded that there are two or three buses that
get into the area after 4:00 p.m.
Sgt. Rawlings responded that the department would have no
objection.
Moved by VC/Intik and seconded by C/Espositio to approve
staff's recommendation.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/istik, Chair Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
VC/Istik asked Mr. Evans if staggering school times to lessen
congestion had been considered, to which Mr. Evans replied in
the affirmative.
conceptual striping Plan for Northside of Pathfinder Road
Between OR 57 On and Off -Ramps.
SE/Liu reported that the Commission had previously reviewed a
conceptual striping plan for the Northside of Pathfinder Road
between SR 57 On and Off -ramps on March 10, 1994. The
striping plan includes 12" white diagonals at 20' intervals
extending along the Northside of Pathfinder Road between SR 57
Ori and Off -ramps for a width of 10' and tapering to zero at
the ramp curb returns.
This proposed striping is designed to provide proper
channelization and effectively manage traffic circulation on
April 14, 1994 Page 6
This proposed, striping is designed to provide proper
channelization and effectively manage traffic circulation on
the Pathfinder Bridge before drivers get to northbound Brea
Canyon Road and is not intended to create an "Emergency Lane."
At the last meeting, the feasibility of the 'plan was
questioned since drivers are trained to pull to the right
during emergency situations. Designating the lane closest to
the curb as an "Emergency Lane" would not be beneficial or
safe. As a result, staff does not recommend the designation
of said lane as an "Emergency Lane", but rather to have the
Traffic and Transportation Commission look at the striping
plan and recommend to the City Council re -striping of said
area in order to provide the proper channelization.
Oscar Law, 25011 Pathfinder Road, commented that he would like
to see three (3) lanes in each direction for a total of six
(6) lanes on the bridge.
C/Gravdahl responded that the offices on the south side of
Pathfinder Road (east of the bridge) have been
allowed/provided with street parking realizing that the
eastbound traffic from the bridge has two lanes of vehicles
feeding it. He perceives three lanes each direction as having
a lock situation to traffic on the bridge.
SE/Liu commented that the cross -hatch area as proposed is a
channelization device to maintain traffic flow into proper
lanes.
Michael Schneider, 1100 Pebblewood Drive, commented that
motorists create their own right -turn lane onto Brea Canyon
Road from the westbound lanes of Pathfinder Road. He thinks
the grids would work if the lanes are not to be added.
VC/Intik commented that it is important to be consistent with
the street markings on this bridge and asked for staff
comments.
SE/Liu responded that a cross -hatch area is recommended for
propmr channelization and is being utilized elsewhere within
the City. For example, the over.crossing of. Grand Avenue at the
SR -57 Southbound Off -ramp (near the Honda Dealership), there
is a cross -hatched area for the eastbound traffic going
towards Golden Springs Drive. Staff recommends that the
Commission consider the striping on that section of Pathfinder
Bridge so that there would be one designated lane of traffic
instead of two lines of traffic in the curb lane.
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/Gravdahl to do no
additional striping on Pathfinder Bridge.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
April 14, 1994 Page 7
AYES: Esposito, Gravdahl, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Landscape Median Island on Golden Springs Drive Between Gana
Court and westerly City Limit.
SE/Liu presented the preliminary layout of the proposed
medians along Golden Springs Drive, between Gona Court and
westerly City limit to the Commission for review and comment.
VC/Istik asked if CalTrans had been contacted regarding this
project at the SR -60 near Gona Court, and if there is a
proposed raised or striped median in that area.
SE/Liu responded that CalTrans has not been contacted at this
time. It is staff's recommendation to stripe the area between
Gona Court and the SR -60 ramps.
C/Gravdahl asked if the plan needed to be approved by CalTrans
prior to going to the City Council, the date staff wants to
take the recommendation to the City Council, and if C/Chavers
had reviewed the report.
SE/Liu responded that the plan would have to be forwarded to
CalTrans in order to get an encroachment permit for
striping/ construction purposes. Their jurisdiction line lies
within approximately 50' of the curb return. Staff would
like to present the recommendations to the City Council in
June, 1994. C/Chavers has the same packet and has not had any
comments on this particular set of plans. These plans had
previously been presented to the Commission as an
informational item. At that time, C/Chavers commented that
the storage capacity for the left -turn pocket on Golden
Springs Drive for the southbound Rapidview Drive needs to be
evaluated to consider the South Point Middle School traffic
during peak hours.
C/Gravdahl made a motion to carry the agenda item over to the
May 12 Traffic.and Transportation Commission Meeting, if it
does not hold up the process dramatically.
Chair/Ortiz requested SE/Liu to respond to the question of
delay.
SE/Liu responded that this is a Capital Improvement Project
programmed for FY 1994-95 and staff would like to take this
item to the City Council as soon as possible. The Commission
has the discretion to hold the item over for formal input from
April 14, 1994 Page 8
C/Chavers, or to have staff work informally with C/Chavers on
this project and subsequently forward the item to Council.
C/Esposito seconded the motion.
SE/Liu added that the project is associated with the
Landscaping Assessment District No. 38.
The Motion was split 2-2 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
Gravdahl, Esposito
NOES:
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Chavers
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by Chair/Ortiz that the
Commission recommend to the City Council that this agenda item
be moved forward for project specification approval.
The Motion was split 2-2 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES:
Gravdahl, Esposito
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Chavers
C/Gravdahl commented that if the funding is from Landscape
Assessment District #38 then the funds are available. He
inquired about the association between the recommended action
and District #38.
SE/Liu responded that the recommended action is to finalize
the conceptual Plan. If the layout looks adequate to the
Commission, the plans and specifications still need to be
finalized and go before the City Council for final approval.
At this stage it is only a conceptual plan, a layout for
review and input from the Commission.
C/Gravdahl commented that all Commissioners need to review the
materials before acting upon the recommendation.
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/ Gravdahl that this agenda
item be continued to the next meeting in May.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
B. Diagonal Parking at Heritage Park Community Center.
April 14, 1994 Page 9
AA/Aberra reported that a safety concern had been brought
before staff regarding diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Road at
Heritage Park Community Center. It is being brought to the
Commission for discussion and comment to either include this
matter as part of the Brea Canyon Road Improvements Project or
recommend to the City Council to install "Parallel Parking
Only" signs along the Heritage Park Community Center frontage
on Brea Canyon Road.
Bob Quartucy, 21446 Broken Arrow Drive, stated that he would
like to see more handicapped parking spaces to accommodate the
seniors attending the meetings at Heritage Park Community
Center.
C/Gravdahl commented that jurisdiction of the grounds at
Heritage Park is with the Parks and Recreation Commission, and
recommended that Mr. Quartucy takes his concerns to. that
Commission. He suggested a local shuttle bus service
utilizing Proposition A Funds. He inquired the use of the
City's two vans in the future.
SE/Liu reported that a comprehensive analysis of the existing
condition of the two vans is in process. Pending upon the
outcome of that report, appropriate recommendations will be
forwarded to the City Council.
Chair/Ortiz asked for clarification as to the correct
Commission to which Mr. Quartucy should take his concerns.
SE/Liu responded that the Parks and Recreation Commission, as
well as, the Planning Commission would be involved with the
request for additional on site parking.
Mr. Quartucy, responded that he is., at the Traff is and
Transportation Commission for off site parking and the future
improvements of Brea Canyon Road.
SE/Liu reported that the limits of the Brea Canyon Road
Improvement Project are between Fountain Springs Drive and
Cool Springs Drive. For the immediate area south of Heritage
Park, staff is recommending the two-lane option as presented
to the Commission previously with right and left -turn pockets
at the appropriate locations or intersections. The frontage
in front of Heritage Park would specifically be designed to
allow parking. Currently, pursuant to the California Vehicle
Code, diagonal parking is not allowed. The Commission could
recommend to the City Council a local ordinance which would
allow diagonal parking at the Heritage Park.
Sgt. Rawlings confirmed that Section 22502 of the Vehicle Code
states that vehicles must park on the right and within 18" of
the curb, and that local ordinance is the means in which
diagonal parking can be established.
April 14, 1994
Page 10
VC/Istik stated that even though on site parking is a Parks
and Recreation issue, he thinks the City should do something
to accommodate the seniors. He further stated that to
accommodate more visitors, diagonal parking should be
recommended to the City Council as part of the Brea Canyon
Road widening project .
C/Esposito requested staff's clarification on posting
"Parallel Parking Only" signs along the Heritage Park
Community Center frontage on Brea Canyon Road.
SE/Liu responded that it appears the situation of diagonal
parking is presenting a problem to the City and that the
posting of "Parallel Parking only" signs is to reinforce the
California Vehicle Code.
Chair/Ortiz commented that signs are technically not needed
for enforcement of the California Vehicle Code.
Sgt. Rawlings commented that the increase of handicapped
spaces on site would decrease the total number of parking
spaces available.
Chair Ortiz stated that the increase is for temporary usage
only.
Oscar Law commented that the traffic in the Heritage Park area
is horrible. He wants to see sidewalks, curbing and parking
on Brea Canyon Road for visitors to the park.
C/Gravdahl suggested that perhaps a retaining wall could be
built so that an area could be widened, paved and an asphalt
berm be poured to allow diagonal parking.
Moved by Chair/Ortiz and seconded by C/Gravdahl to deny the
recommendation brought from staff to install "Parallel Parking
only" signs.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
VC/Istik then moved that the Traffic and Transportation
Commission recommend to the City Council and advise the Parks
and Recreation Commission that more handicapped spaces be
installed at Heritage Park as soon as possible.
Chair/Ortiz seconded the motion and with VC/Istik's
concurrence amended the motion to include changing the spaces
of the handicap location from the restroom side to the
entrance of the building with the ramp directly in front of
April 14, 1994
Page 11
the entrance and change the color of the ramp from blue to
white striping. Furthermore, to increase the permanent
handicapped parking spaces to a total of six, three on each
side of the ramp.
VC/Istik concurred with the amendment to the motion.
Sgt. Rawlings remarked that enforcement of temporary handicap
parking would be difficult because an enforceable handicap
parking space is defined in the Vehicle Code as having a sign
in front of the space with the picture of the wheelchair and
appropriate pavement markings. Both the sign and the pavement
marking are required.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
SE/Liu stated that he would forward this recommendation to the
Parks and Recreation Commission and to the City Council in a
timely manner.
VC/Istik stated that prior to the Brea Canyon Road Improvement
Project, measures need to be taken to offset the current
under -parking situation at Heritage Park.
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/Esposito to recommend to
the City Council to implement diagonal parking at Heritage
Park by directing staff to design a viable solution as soon as
possible.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
Chair/Ortiz commented that he had to advise Mr. Quartucy of
the 6:30 p.m. meeting time. Mr. Quartucy was informed that
the Traffic and Transportation Meeting will be held at 7:00
p.m. by the Parks and Recreation Department. He apologized to
Mr. Quartucy for the misinformation he was given.
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
VC/Istik requested staff to check with CalTrans about
relocating the "Chino Hills Next Exit" sign for Chino Hills on
April 14, 1994
Page 12
SE/Liu responded that the City Council is aware of this issue,
and that Mayor Werner has sent a letter to Mr. Jerry Baxter of
CalTrans regarding the impact of this "Chino Hills Next Exit"
sign.
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF
A. Traffic signal Warrant Analysis for the Intersection of
Diamond Bar Boulevard.and Silver Hawk Drive.
SE/Liu stated that as requested by Chair/Ortiz on March 10,
1994, the report (dated 11/1/91) is being presented for the
Commission's information, review and discussion. For Fiscal
Year 1994-95 there are seven warrant studies being requested
for budget consideration.
VC/Istik commented that the warrant study, dated November 1,
1991, is no longer adequate based on the finding of five
accidents in one year. He suggested that another updated
warrant study is needed.
C/Gravdahl inquired about the cost of a traffic signal warrant
analysis, how many traffic signals are being proposed in
Fiscal Year 1994-95, and how many open - warrants are
outstanding.
SE/Liu responded that the fee of a traffic signal warrant
analysis is approximately $1,000.00. There are three signals
being recommended to the City Manager/City Council for
construction in Fiscal Year 1994-95, and there are no
outstanding warrants.
VC/Istik commented that the Traffib Signal Warrant Analysis as
provided by DKS Associates on November 1, 1991 recommends that
when traffic volummes increase then the warrant analysis
should be re-evaluated.
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/Gravdahl to request for a
new warrant analysis be conducted at the intersection of
Diamond Bar Boulevard and Silver Hawk Drive.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
B. Future Agenda Items
SE/Liu commented that C/Chavers had asked staff to bring a
list of candidate intersections to receive warrant studies for
Fiscal Year 1994-1995.
April 14, 1994 Page 13
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. City Commission Rosters
Chair/Ortiz commented on the legibility of the list and
inquired if the Commissioners were contacted as to their phone
numbers.
AA/Aberra responded that the list of phone numbers was
provided by the City Clerk.
VC/Istik requested that his home phone number be provided in
lieu of his work number.
SE/Liu noted that a revised list would be provided at the next
meeting.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Esposito and carried unanimously
to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ David C. T -iii
David G. Liu
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Tom Ortiz
Tom Ortiz
Chairman
C:\W P6D\LMAKAY\TT-94\APL14#I2.94
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MAY 12, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ortiz called the meeting to order at. 6:30 p.m. at the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Hearing Room, 21865 East
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairman Istik.
ROLL CALL
Chair/Ortiz indicated that C/Gravdahl and C/Esposito would be
absent and excused from tonight's meeting.
Commissioners: Chavers, vice Chairman Istik, and Chairman Ortiz.
Staff: Senior Engineer, David Liu; Administrative
Assistant, Tseday Aberra; Sergeant Rawlings,
and Engineering Secretary, Linda Smith.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting of April 14, 1994
C/Chavers was excused from the April 14, 1994 Traffic and
Transportation Commission Meeting and abstained from voting on
the minutes.
Chair/Ortiz requested that he would like to review the tapes
for specific items he thought wera missing from the minutes.
These items referred to discussion regarding how the minutes
are prepared and the time of the Traffic and Transportation
Commission Meetings.
SE/Liu commented that after the Traffic and Transportation
Conaission tape is reviewed together with Chair/Ortiz, the
minutes would be revised to include such items accordingly.
The revised minutes would then be presented to the Commission
for approval at the June 9, 1994 meeting.
II. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
IP. CONSENT CALENDAR - None
May 12, 1994
V. OLD BVSI11aSS
Page 2
A. Landscape Median Island on Golden £prangs Drive Between Gona
Court and Westerly City Limit.
SE/Liu reported that the proposed medians along Golden Springs
Drive, between Gona Court and westerly City limit have been
proposed as part of the Landscaping Assessment District 138
improvements.
At the April 14, 1994 Traffic and Transportation Commission
meeting, the Commission requested this conceptual layout plan
be continued to the May 12, 1994 meeting in order to give all
Commissioners an opportunity to review this matter. With the
input received from the Commission, staff has subsequently
worked with Commissioner Chavers and received the following
comments/input: (1) To determine the need for a left -turn
pocket on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Coco's/Jack-In-
The-Box Restaurants; (2) To determine CalTrans' jurisdiction
in the vicinity of Golden Springs Drive and the SR 60 On/Off
ramps; and (3) To determine the need for the right -turn pocket
on eastbound Golden Springs Drive at Calbourne Drive.
Staff presented the preliminary layout and asked the Traffic
and Transportation Commission to review and provide further
input regarding the attached plan for incorporation into the
design process.
VC/Istik suggested that the landscaping proposed for the
medians be of the drought tolerant type. He preferred the
bubbler type irrigation as opposed to spray irrigation. He
commented that less water on the asphalt extends pavement
life.
C/Chavers commented that he would like to see the striping
plan brought back to the Commission after the design phase is
completed, and asked if there had been any resolution to the
items as mentioned in the report.
WitAk regard to item 11, SE/Liu responded that there is a need
for aleft -turn pocket provided. With regard to item 12, He
stated that the exact location of CalTrans, jurisdiction is
still unknown, but that there is still time during the design.
process to obtain this information. At this time, the intent
is to construct between Lemon Avenue and the westerly City
limit along the northerly frontage of Golden Springs Drive.
If there is development at a later date, the developer will
contribute to the needed improvements. Regarding item 13,
SE/Liu said the right -turn pocket on eastbound Golden Springs
Drive at Calbourne Drive, currently exists. He noted that
once the design is completed with plans and specifications, it
will be brought to the Commission for final review before
forwarding the matter to the City Council.
May 12, 1994 Page 3
Chair/Ortiz read a memorandum from C/Gravdahl with his
comments on this item. His main concern was on the item of
the center median between Gona Court and the freeway off -
ramp. He noted that he had been in contact with SE/Liu and
his concerns were addressed, namely that the area would be
striped.for future flexibility. With this in mind, he would
vote yes on the project. His other comment regarding GPAC is
noted in VIII, Items From Commissioners.
It was the consensus of the Commission to have staff proceed
with the design of the landscape median island on Golden
Springs Drive between Gona Court and westerly City limit.
B. Traffic Circulation at Lorbeer Junior High School.
AA/Aberra reported that this item is being presented as
requested by C/Esposito. The attached November 14, 1991
report discussed the traffic circulation in the vicinity of
Lorbeer Junior High School which was observed and studied in
November, 1991. The result of the observation showed illegal
U-turns and parking in the bicycle lane on southbound Diamond
Bar Boulevard. These activities were related to congestion
and were seen as potential safety hazard. To minimize the
impact of the U-turns and illegal parking, "No U -Turn" signs
and red curbing were installed on southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard in front of Lorbeer Junior High School.
Recently, staff visited the site and found the "No U -Turn"
signs and red curbs are still intact and visible to motorists.
There are no "No Stopping" signs installed at the site. To
better manage the congestion created by illegal double-parking
and parking in the red zone, staff recommends traffic
enforcement in the area.
C/Istik commented that enforcement is the only answer since
the school district is not staggering the class schedules and
bus service is no longer free, which seems to create more
traffic.
Sgt. Rawlings also made a site visit on Monday and noted
several illegal U-turns and the illegal parking. Although
them were illegal turns, he observed no difficulties or
hazards with these turns and questioned the length of the
existing red curbing in front of the school.
C/Ortiz asked for clarification regarding the length of red
curb.
SE/Liu responded that the total length of red curbs is
approximately 500 feet. He noted that the original intent of
the red curb markings was to prevent parking in the bike lane.
This would encourage the utilization of the on-site parking
lot to be used for loading and unloading school children.
May 12, 1994
Page 4
Currently, parents may be prohibited to use the on-site
parking lot.
C/Chavers commented that his recollection of the discussion
that led to the striping was such that the driveways to the
on-site parking lot are on the inside of a gradual horizontal
curve. Part of the reason for the extension of the red
curbing as painted was to allow those exiting the driveway to
actually see oncoming traffic, this eliminating the need for
those vehicles to pull out into the traffic lane to see on-
coming traffic. The remainder of curve was nominal so the
entire curb area was marked red, since it is the familiar
color to most people. He concurs and supports staff's
recommendation to leave the area as is.
Chair/Ortiz stated that educating the schools and parents is
another option to eliminate the on-going traffic problems and
matters of safety.
Moved by C/Chavers and seconded by VC/Istik to accept staff's
recommendation and encourage traffic enforcement as deemed
necessary by the Sheriff's Department. Further, the
Commission requested staff to explore the possibility of
distributing flyers which convey the intention and purposes of
the traffic markings in front of Lorbeer Junior High School.
Chair/Ortiz asked Sgt. Rawlings to provide to the Commission
the number of citations given at the school site for the next
two months.
Sgt. Rawlings responded that his computer tracking does not
allow for parking citations, but tjiat he would do a hand tally
on a day-to-day basis.
Chair/Ortiz requested the hand tally be done for the next two
months.
The Motion carried 3-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
Chavers,
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Esposito,
VI. NEW BUSINESS
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
Gravdahl
A. parking on Southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, Between Acacia
Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road.
AA/Aberra reported that it has been the procedure of the City
of Diamond Bar to receive and review, on a case-by-case basis,
requests from church organizations to park on major arterial
during special church services and functions. Saint Denis
Nay 121 1994
Page 5
Catholic Church, located at 2151 Diamond Bar Boulevard, has
requested an on -street parking on southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road
every Sunday. To date, churches and organizations have been
given permission to park on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard,
generally between Morning Canyon Road and Silver Hawk Drive
only during special church services or functions. 'They are
required to cover the existing "No Parking" signs with bags
and remove them after their events end.
Staff recommends Saint Denis' request for on -street parking be
limited to special church services and functions in order to
maintain a consistent policy with other churches and
organizations. Furthermore, to minimize impact to the bicycle
lane, it is necessary to regulate the parking activities by
various organizations along Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Monsignor James Loughnane, 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., who
represents approximately 5200 families at nine services every
weekend, commented that he is concerned about the availability
of parking spaces for the worshipers during Sunday services.
The services are staggered every hour and a half, but parking
spaces are not adequate. He asked for an additional parking
area on southbound Diamond Bar Blvd. between Acacia Hill Road
and Morning Canyon Road during their Sunday church service.
C/Istik commented that the major roadways should be used to
move traffic, not to park vehicles, but since Sunday is not a
peak travel day on Diamond Bar Blvd., he felt he could support
the request. He suggested that it be approved with a
monitoring of the situation for a period of time.
C/Chavers commented that a precedence may be set in allowing
this request, and asked staff to research comments and/or
background information regarding parking versus the number of
seat capacity during the expansion of Saint Denis Church.
There may have been an exception noted for allowing the
construction without ample parking. This would establish a
reason other than sympathy and compassion for allowing parking
on as arterial. He commented that other requests could be
foming to the Commission with no other reason than a need
faWacre parking.
SE/Liu responded that he would check with the Planning
Department to see what records might be available, and will
provide the information to the Commission and to the Church.
Chair/Ortiz asked if there had been any complaints from the
neighbors in the areas indicated. He commented by stating
that when parking on Diamond Bar Blvd. for special occasions
and holidays was approved, it had been determined that there
were no safety hazards since the bike lane was wide. He asked
Sgt. Rawlings if he was aware of any accidents with bicyclists
and motorists parked in the lane. He also asked about the
May 12, 1994 Page 6
Monsignor's contact with members of the .City Council and
inquired about their responses regarding this issue.
Monsignor Loughnane responded by saying that he had been told
Shady Hills Drive has become a shortcut to Pathfinder Road
from Diamond Bar Blvd., and had received complaints. He also
stated that he was told by Councilmembers to write a letter
and make a formal request to the Traffic and Transportation
Commission.
Sgt. Rawlings was not aware of any accidents with motorists
and bicyclists in the vicinity.
Chair/Ortiz commented that staff's report indicates that each
request is being reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and feels
the Commission can proceed with this premise, bearing in mind
any safety hazard involved. For the record, he commented that
he is a parishioner.
SE/Liu interjected with the Chair's permission to ask
Monsignor Loughnane, as the representative of Saint Denis
Church, if Saint Denis Church would be willing to pay for the
costs associated with any proposed or recommended
modifications, in terms of the signs and the installation
costs.
Monsignor Loughnane, responded that he believed this request
will need to be approved by the church's finance committee.
Chair/Ortiz moved that the Commission deny staff's
recommendation and recommend to the City Council that the
request of Saint Denis Catholic Church for on -street parking
every Sunday on southbound Diamond Bair Boulevard, between
Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road be permitted.
VC/Istik seconded the motion and amended the recommendation to
have a time limit set for twenty-four (24) months at which
time the request would be reviewed to assess any issues of
safety which might come up in the interim.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
C/Chavers amended the motion to ask staff to go into the
archives and seek an engineering basis to determine if there
were some over-riding concerns for the size of the parking lot
and the approval of the church, and that it be included in the
recommendation to the City Council if found.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
The Motion was passed unanimously with the following ROLL CALL
vote:
May 12, 1994
AYES:
Chavers,
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Esposito,
Page 7
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
Gravdahl
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEIKS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM CONNISSIONERS
Chair/Ortiz conveyed C/Gravdahl's written comment which stated
that when he and C/Chavers were GPAC delegates they were
representatives of the Traffic and Transportation Commission
and would vote the consensus of the old Traffic and
Transportation Commission as far as circulation matters were
concerned. With the placement of the new members, he feels a
new consensus should be taken. By placing this item on the
next agenda, it allows the delegates to vote the consensus of
all the Traffic and Transportation Commissioners.
C/Chavers commented that he was at the last GPAC meeting,
which was held on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, and will continue to
attend as both a citizen and/or as a representative of the
Traffic and Transportation Commission.
C/Istik commented that he, too, has attended and provided
input at the GPAC meetings in the past and that he would also
be available as both a citizen and/or as a representative of
the Traffic and Transportation Commission.
Chair/Ortiz commented that C/Chavers and VC/Istik should
remain as representatives of the Traffic & Transportation
Commission to the GPAC Committee subject to any replacements
should either one be unable to attend. He also asked SE/Liu
if there was any feedback regarding the Traffic and
Transportation Commission recommendation to the Parks and
Recreation Commission on the handicapped parking at Heritage
Park issue.
SE/Liu responded that staff had conveyed the concerns and
coments of the Traffic and Transportation commission to Mr.
Bob Rose, the Director of Community Services. Mr. Rose
contacted the Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club. The details
of the arrangements will be forthcoming.
IX. ITEw FROM STAFF
A. Traffic Signal Policy for Private and Public Street
Intersections
SE/Liu reported that a copy of the Policy for Funding
Traffic Signals at Private and Public Street
Intersections is being presented as requested by the
Commission.
May 12, 1994 Page 8
B. Future Agenda Items
C/Chavers requested that protected -permissive left -turn
phasing be investigated and discussed for use in the City
of Diamond Bar.
C/Istik clarified protected -permissive operation as a
left -turn phasing that could change to yield on green.
C/Chavers commented that the sign utilized is "Left -Turn
Yield on Green".
Chair/Ortiz commented that this is now used on northbound
Golden Springs Drive at Diamond Bar Blvd. He commented
about the enforcement issue involved with this type of
control.
Chair/Ortiz stated that he sees a need to change the
meeting starting time from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. to
encourage public input. Further, for consistency with
all the meetings held by the City of Diamond Bar and to
allow adequate time for Commissioners to get to the
meetings after work, it is beneficial to have the
meetings start at 7:00 p.m.
With the Commission's consensus, the above mentioned
items were requested to be put on the future agenda.
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. City Commission Rosters
B. Traffic signal Warrant Analysis List
C/Chavers commented that the priorities as shown in the
report are at least two to three years old and asked if
the priority list would be revisited to assure that the
most pressing need is addressed. He also asked how the
approval is handled by City Council.
VC/Istik commented that priority 14, Sunset Crossing Road
and Southbound SR 57, the traffic is generated by the
Southbound SR 57 not the east/west traffic on Sunset
Crossing Road. The southbound SR 57 traffic is motorists
who get off at Sunset Crossing Road in order to travel
south on Diamond Bar Blvd. to go to SR 60 because it was
initially designed inappropriately. He does not believe
that City of Diamond Bar funds should be spent for a
traffic signal at Sunset Crossing Road and southbound SR
57 if it is going to help primarily the southbound SR 57
to the eastbound SR 60 traffic.
SE/Liu responded that the list being presented is in
preparation for the proposed Fiscal Year 1994-95 budget.
Nay 12, 1994 Page 9
The budget is for seven or eight traffic signal warrant
analysis studies at approximately $1,000 per study. The
intent is for staff to conduct the proposed warrant
studies concurrently in order for the data to be
evaluated on a compreh:nsive level. The findings will be
brought to the Commission in order to establish a new
priority list.
C/Chavers, agreeing with VC/Is'L:ik would like to see
Sunset Crossing Road eliminated from the warrant study
list. He commented that Ca!Trans has jurisdiction and
they should have the information.
VC/Istik asked about the eighth analysis mentioned by
SE/Liu.
SE/Liu commented that this would be for left -turn phasing
on Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive.
C. Interim City Attorney: Re-Openinq of Public Comments
Agenda item
D. Transit subsidy Program
SE/Liu referred to the flyer for the Transit Subsidy
Program. Funded by Proposition A funds, the subsidy
program will go into effect June 1, 1994. The City of
Diamond Bar will be subsidizing 20$ discount for students
and the general public, and 50% discount for seniors and
the physically challenged citizens of Diamond Bar. This
discount applies to Metrolink, Foothill, and Metropolitan
Transit Authority (joint) passes. Fares will depend on
the traveller's route.
XI. AWOURNMEW
Moved by C/Chavers, seconded by VC/Istik and carried unanimously to
adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ David G. Liu
David G. Liu
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Tom Ortiz
Tom Ortiz
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
MAY 26, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Goldenberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Goldenberg.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Goldenberg, Vice Chairman Ruzicka
Commissioners: Medina, Schey, and Tye
Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose
Recreation Supervisor Maria Pearlman
Absent: None
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None
MINUTES
1. Minutes of March 17, 1994
Moved by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Shey and carried unanimously to approve
the minutes of March 17, 1994.
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
2. Park Signage
CSD/Rose provided a supplemental packet and reported on the progress to date
regarding the replacement and/or correction of the existing park identification
signs to reflect the City of Diamond Bar versus Los Angeles County under the
$30,000 budget appropriated by the City Council. He stated there are seven
May 26, 1994 Page 2
(7) existing signs. Peterson Park has no sign. Summit Ridge and Ronald
Reagan Parks each have two signs. A total of ten (10) signs are needed.
CSD/Rose suggested a variety of options to deal with this matter and stay
within the $30,000 budget. The cost to replace every sign with a concrete
monument sign would be over $31,000 to purchase and have them installed.
The bids to remove the existing signs range from $500 to $800 each, which
would put the total cost over the budget limit.
CSD/Rose presented a memo with a quote from Quick Crete regarding proposed
Prices for installing monument signs as well as utilizing an acrylic overlay to
retrofit a portion of the existing signs. CSD/Rose indicated this quote would be
within the budget, but he feels a need to visit samples. He questions the wear
life.
Wood signs are still being considered. No estimates have been received to date.
CSD/Rose stated that the current signs constructed of wood are not holding up
well. Photos were reviewed. Maple Hill's sign is the worst example, which was
installed 1987 and now needs to be replaced. There is some damage to
Sycamore Canyon's sign, which looks as though it has been cut.
CSD/Rose showed samples of a monument sign and logo from Quick Crete and
explained how the installation of an acrylic overlay could be done. He asked for
comments on the samples presented. The logo would be a six -color acrylic
reproduction of the City of Diamond Bar's logo which would be set into the
monument.
CSD/Rose stated that the $30,000 sign budget was not only for monument
signs but to also replace the "Rules" signs that still list "L.A. County" on them.
He also stated that signs should be added in the pavilions near the picnic tables
which would show that those areas are available to be reserved.
CSD/Rose stated that the first priority is to identify the parks as City of Diamond
Bar Parks versus L.A. County. The $30,000 is being carried over to the next
fiscal year budget as the current fiscal year is coming to a close.
Chair/Goldenberg cannot picture the sign. He asked where the 6 colors for the
logo was determined.
CSD/Rose stated that a City logo was provided to Quick Crete but he is not sure
what the 6 different colors are for the logo they are referring to.
May 26, 1994
Page 3
C/Schey stated that he is trying to picture the acrylic overlay.
CSD/Rose provided a rendering of an acrylic strip which was provided by Quick
Crete.
C/Tye questioned why we would spend $30,000 on park signs instead of the
library.
CSD/Rose explained that the residents of Diamond Bar may limit their use of the
parks due to confusion about who to contact, whether it be L.A. County or the
City of Diamond Bar.
Chair/Goldenberg commented that it is a legal issue. Qiumby funds must be
used in the Parks and may not be transferred to the Library.
VC/Ruzicka thinks $30,000 is a lot of money, but in full context of the total task to
be accomplished, he feels it is worth the money.
C/Schey stated a concern about attaching acrylic to an old wood sign and feels
replacement probably would be better. He is not clear on what the acrylic sign
is.
CSD/Rose explained the material as being opaque with coloring on the surface,
and is designed to deter vandalism.
CSD/Rose stated he is still exploring the issue and is not ready to recommend a
purchase at this time and asked for input, from the Commission as to viable
alternatives.
C/Tye asked if new monuments would have acrylic overlays.
CSD/Rose stated that the new monuments will not have acrylic over lays, only
those S%M being corrected.
VC/Ru2kka asked if the price quoted by Quick Crete includes demolition.
CSD/Rose stated that he is unsure at this time, but will check. He also stated
that some footings will need to be replaced.
C/Schey asked if another font could be used other than Times Roman, which
he feels looks like typewriting.
May 26, 1994
Page 4
C/Tye asked if there are any other bids.
CSD/Rose replied there were no bids yet, but after specifications were
determined a bid package would be put together.
Chair/Goldenberg felt the sample is dull and asked if there were any other
companies who do this kind of work. His personal preference is wood.
CSD/Rose referred to a park in Chino on Central at Edison Ave. that has a
monument sign with nice color and a flower bed area around the sign. He
stated that we are not limited to the type of sign at Summit Ridge Park and that
other choices are available.
Chair/Goldenberg asked how much of the $30,000 can be spent on the park
identification signage and allow for the completion of the remainder of the
items.
CSD/Rose stated that there is no estimate for that yet.
Chair/Goldenberg stated that since we are working under a budget restraint,
how picky can we get with the signage.
CSD/Rose explained that a variety of options are available to us, and perhaps
the Commission should form an ad hoc committee to study the matter further.
Chair/Goldenberg agreed that it would be a good idea to form an ad hoc
committee.
VC/Ruzicka moved to appoint two Commissioners to work with CSD/Rose.
The motion was seconded by C/Schey.
C/Tye questioned why the cost was stated as $1,740 and the cost in memo
was listed at $3,170.
CSD/Rose explained that $1,740 is the cost of the, sign and $3,170 is the cost
of the sign including installation.
C/Tye asked when quotes for -wood signs would be available.
CSD/Rose, stated that he did not have a time line at this time.
Chair/Goldenberg, VC/Ruzicka, and C/Schey requested samples of the acrylic.
May 26, 1994
Page 5
A conssmsus of the Commission was obtained to form an ad hoc committee to study
the sign issues and Chair/Goldenberg appointed Steve Tye and Joe Ruzicka to the ad
hoc committee.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
3. Recreation Contract Status
CSD/Rose stated he is now in the process of working on the budget for the next
fiscal year. His intentions are to contract for recreational services with the City
of Brea for another year. There has been a lot of discussion about bringing the
recreation program in house for the last six months. One of the issues is that
the City of Diamond Bar is operated as a contract city and, therefore, should
continue to contract for most services, including recreation. But he feels there
may be a variety of advantages to moving the recreation in house, none the
least of which would be the possible cost -savings element.
CSD/Rose reported that the 1994-95 contract proposal from the City of Brea for
the next fiscal year is $306,653. The 1993-94 contract was for 8309,000.
The reason for the decrease is that liability insurance for 1993-94 cost 815,000.
For 1994-95 that cost is down to about 89,000. The revenue being projected
for 1994-95 is a little higher at 8214,000, as opposed to 8211,000 for 1993-
94.
CSD/Rose is pleased with the City of Brea program and is only interested in
looking at ways of doing what is best for the community as far as cost -savings
are concerned. The budget process is ongoing and he feels that an in-house
recreation program could save 835,000 or more.
CSD/Rose announced due to the limited space in City Hall, the recreation staff
will move to a portable building located at Sycamore Canyon Park next week.
VC/Rlks questioned the timing of bringing the program in house and feels
that &*Wual change would attain good results and maintain a good rapport
with the City of Brea.
CSD/Rose replied that part of the recreation program is already in house with
the exception of the youth and adult athletics and contract classes. The City
of Brea utilizes three supervisor level positions for these programs and Diamond
Bar would only use two of these positions if the recreation program is brought
in house.
May 26, 1994
Page 6
VC/Ruzicka asked if the transition would be noticeable by the public.
CSD/Rose replied that if the same staff were used, the public would be unaware
that one day they were Brea staff and the next day become Diamond Bar staff.
If Brea keeps the staff currently operating the program in Diamond Bar, then
there is a possibility of the public noticing the difference.
Chair/Goldenberg feels a $35,000 savings is well and good and asked about the
down side.
CSD/Rose explained that if turnover is great, unemployment costs would
increase. Also, the City of Brea is exempt from paying retirement benefits on
part-time employees. The City of Diamond Bar, on the other hand, must pay
retirement benefits on all part-time employees who work over 20 hours a week,
thereby increasing these costs.
CSD/Rose stated that the City of Brea has three administrative positions and the
City of Diamond Bar would downgrade to two administrative positions and
would need one part-time 30 -hour per week clerical, one part-time 15 to 20-
hour work week athletic coordinator, and several part-time seasonal staff.
CSD/Rose went on to explain that we would no longer pay the mileage costs
of Brea staff driving to Diamond Bar, and would save on the 22% overhead -
charge ($53,580) which covers postage, flyers, office space, telephones, etc.
VC/Ruzicka asked what Brea's reaction is.
CSD/Rose stated they expect this to happen at some point. The contract is
now operating on a month-to-month basis. Brea should continue to run the
program through the summer and then go in house in September. There would
be no problem with an in-house program and it would give Diamond Bar more
flexibility from a management point of view.
C/Mediu agreed.
CSD/Rose stated that if it is determined that it is not a good business decision
to go in house, then we should make a long-term commitment with Brea. There
is a concern of hidden costs that may make it more costly than estimated to go
in house.
C/Tye does not see the benefit of going in house and questioned the benefit.
May 26, 1994
Page 7
CSD/Rose stated that is is a policy issue. As an example of the benefit for in
house, he stated that special events, such as the 5th Anniversary Celebration
are more easily conducted with in house staff than with contractors. There is
more flexibility in scheduling staff to meet community needs.
Chair/Goldenberg asked what the anticipated growth factor for the recreation
program was and at what point do you add personnel?
CSD/Rose replied the next step in personnel is to change the 30 -hour per week
Part-time clerical position to full time. But only if there are revenue increases
of $5,000 to $7,000 per year over the next two years.
CSD/Rose would like to see an in-house day camp program but states there is
limited time for current staff to establish such a program. .He feels it would
make more revenue than the cost to operate.
C/Medina suggested hiring retired individuals.
CSD/Rose said we need people with energy. He estimated the revenue from the
program to be $70-90 per week per participant and that the program could be
housed at Sycamore Canyon Park.
Chair/Goldenberg stated the recreation program is costing $180,000 per year
and feels we should try to level off anticipated costs.
C/Medina asked who determines part-time and full-time status and why does
Brea have more hours.
CSD/Rose. explained that a new agency has to follow current state law.
Chair/Goldenberg would like to see the program in house.
C/SchGV stated that he had mixed emotions. He felt an in house program could
be use*as a political tool. He also felt that a contractual operation can be
controlled better than in house. He would like a more detailed proposal.
C/Tye stated fiscal concerns.
VC/Ruzicka wanted recreation program in house from the beginning.
C/Tye, asked how old is Brea?
May 26, 1994
Page 8
CSD/Hose replied, that Brea incorporated in 1917, making it 77 years old.
C/Tye, asked if after five years, are we ready?
C/Schey, explained that Diamond Bar is primarily a contract city.
VC/Ruzicka asked if the commission would be going against the grain.
2. Recreation Program Update
RS/Marla passed out results from San Gabriel Valley Municipal track meet. The
City of Diamond Bar performed very well, with many particpants qualifying for
the S.C.M.A.F. finals in Long Beach. The City was well represented at the
Association Meet.
The 4 and 5 -year-old youth baseball program is full. Other age groups are still
taking participants. Staff is still seeking volunteer coaches for 10 and 11 year
Olds division. All coaches attend training per NYSCA standards. The youth
baseball program starts on July 5. Contract class registration begins June 11
at Heritage Park.
RS/Pearlman also reported revenue for contract classes for fiscal year May 1-,
1993 to April 30, 1994, of $133,188, which is $3,188 over the . goal of
130, 000.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chair/Goldenberg suggested that the Commission consider expanding the scope of
their responsibilities.
VC/Ruzicka stppested changing the designation from "Parks and Recreation" to
"Community lirvicea Commission" to allow for more functions, such as seeking a
designation of the 57 freeway as a scenic highway.
Chair/Goldenberg requested that whatever comes of the discussion to be relayed to
the City Council for their input.
VC/Ruzicka stated that he has discussed this with Councilmember Papen and
CSD/Rose. He observed that other cities have already made such a change.
May 26, 1994
Page 9
C/Medina highly recommended the idea of the name changes and not just doing
parks and recreation but also doing cultural activities. He also reported that Oak Tree
Lanes was having a State bowling tournament, which has attracted 50,000 people,
with many of them staying at Shilo Inn.
Chair/Goldenberg stated that a Commission name change would have to be
authorized by the City Council.
C/Tye asked where the Community Services Director gets direction on issues not
under the Parks and Recreation Commission.
CSD/Rose replied that direction comes from the City Manager.
CSD/Rose stated that staff will draft a proposal for a Commission name change that
will come back to the Commission as a future agenda item.
VC/Ruzicka stated that he felt the City Councilmembers will look upon a Commission
name change favorably and that should be the way to go.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by VC/Ruzicka and second by C/Schey and carried unanimously to adjourn
at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Bob Rose
Bob Rose
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Mike Goldenberg
Mike Goldenberg
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMIVIISSION
HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 28, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Goldenberg called the meeting to order at 7:20 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Goldenberg.
ROLL CALL
Present: COMMISSIONERS MEDINA, TYE, VICE CHAIRMAN RUZICKA
AND CHAIRMAN GOLDENBERG
COMMISSIONER SCHEY arrived at 7:40 p.m.
Staff. BOB ROSE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, MARLA PEARLMAN,
RECREATION SUPERVISOR AND SANDY BARLOW, ADMIIVISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Chairman Goldenberg introduced Councilmember Eileen Ansari and asked if she wished to
discuss a specific item. She replied that she was only there to observe.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
C/ Ruzich moved to accept the minutes of February 17, 1994 and C/ Medina seconded
the motion. The minutes were approved as read.
Chair/ Goldenberg asked for the three sets of minutes from previous meetings. Because
Liz was quitting, the minutes were promised for the next meeting to be held on Thursday,
May 26, 1994. Councilman Goldenberg felt that this might be a difficult task.
OLD BUSP.VESS
Chair/Goldenberg introduced Larry Ryan from R.J.M. Design Group, Inc. Mr. Ryan explained
that his firm looked at WBP in terms of ADA. They completed the analysis and listed
deficiencies with RR, Tot !et signage and the parking !ot. ADA does not have to be dona at
every park! On the base map overview you can see significant deficiencies with the Rest Room
on the walkway of the lot in terms of access and safety according to the Consumer Products
Safety Committee and ADA.
In the tot lot, he recommended to the Commission its demolition. Construction of a new tot lot
will be done to accommodate many users as well as provide for both the "challenged" and active
play.
In addition, Lamy recommended working with Ron Mincer who is a quadriplegic and helps make
recommendations based upon his life experiences.
There are a couple of policy issue areas that need to be decided upon by the city. The current
walk has a slope beyond that which is allowed by ADA. At the current slope, the walk must have
landings and handrails in order to be accessible according to ADA standards.
Councilmember Ansari queried about the cost of the ramps and handrails.
C/Ruzicka discussed the cost associated with placing the handrails on both sides of the walkway
and redoing the sidewalk.
Councilmember Ansari asked Larry's opinion of what he would do. Larry weighed the factors in
determining use by handicapped versus active.
C/Ruzicka indicated that because of the parks' use, he is against the handrails because the kids use
the open area of the park and in running down the hill might run into the handrail.
C/Tye added that the intent of ADA is not to spend a lot of money to dramatically change the
park, but take sr to be in the spirit of ADA.
C/Medina S14d that on the backside of the basketball courts that a walk might be possible to
the tennis courts.
C/Schey indicated that when dealing with a policy issue, the Commission must look at the intent
of ADA and the overall recreation picture. Opportunities for these program elements are
available and we can make sure that they do exist in other nearby areas.
C/Ruzicka agreed and indicated that, if questioned, the Commission would be able to verify that
other opportunities were available.
C/Medina suggested that a backside approach would allow the use of handrails because it is away
from children.
Mr.Ryan indicated that would not work because of the grading requirements.
CSD/Rose asked Lary Ryan what the deepest sidewalk could be.
Larry Ryan explained that the walk is currently 8 - 9%. The maximum for a ramp is 8%.
CSD/Rose then asked for an estimate of a gradient backside.
C/Tye believed it was about 20 feet, so it is a relatively short distance.
Larry Ryan indicated that the walk does not just provide access to the tennis areas, but the picnic
area as well. So by reconstructing the walk., an accessible covered picnic area can be provided as
well. Once the policy is fine tuned, the design can also be fine tuned.
C/Schey asked if the picnic area can be placed behind the Rest Room. He asked why the
Commission would make the play area ADA, but not continue up to the tennis courts?
Larry Ryan described the play equipment and proposed ADA access with a circuit through the
sand area via a rubber matting surface.
Chair/Goldenberg thanked Larry Ryan for his presentation.
C/Schey asked what the ad hoc committee recommended.
C/Ruzicka explained that the committee recommends that the Commission approve the walkway
be brought to standards to a point then, have a new picnic area that is accessible.
C/Tye questioned the need for the original retrofit all the way to the Tennis Courts, but preferred
limiting the retrofitted walkway to the mid area and add the picnic structure that would be
accessible
Mr. Ryan interjected that as of April, 1994 anything at a grade of S% or greater needs handrails.
The walkway could be elongated, but then the walkway would eat into the park open area.
C/Ruzicka indicated that the proposed ADA accessible picnic area mixed with other areas that are
not ADA accessible would still show a good faith effort.
C/Schey made a motion to recommend to City Council the reconstruction of the walkway be
listed as a second priority and the tot lot be of a higher priority.
CSD/Rose stated that phasing can be instituted.
C/Schey stated that he would prefer a single phase but if one comes before the other then the tot
lot should be first.
C/Ruzicka indicated that the walkway would include landings and the picnic shelter would include
picnic tables and BBQs.
NEW BUSINESS:
Chair/Goldenberg asked that C/Schey provide the Committee with a GPAC update.
C/Schey indicated that the GPAC is advancing, just not very quickly. The current topic is the
land use element and it does not have much impact on parks and Recreation. Consideration
should be given to future elements and how they impact the P & R Master planThere was some
controversy due to a perceived influence the developers might have on the Committee. The City
Council restructured the voting members so developers no longer have voting rights, but they are
still on the committee. People felt it was inappropriate. GPAC was postponed until May 10
pending the CC Committee Meeting of May 3. GPAC is moving. Land use is the first element to
be looked at but other elements such as resources will have the biggest impact on parks and
Recreation.
Chair/Goldenberg questioned whether the GPAC understood that its an overview not just CC/R's.
C/Schey concurred, but participants concerned that there will not be enough substance to the
General Plan which would result in another referendum. At the same time, there is a group that
wants to use regulations, so there is conflict. Resolution is not always easy, but it is moving.
C/Ruzicka asked about the current time limit.
Councilmember Ansari indicated that the date is October, 1994.
C/Ruzicka is glad to hear that it is moving as long as it keeps moving.
C/Schey indicated that the GPAC's desire is to have the meetings move forward, but the question
is how fast.
C/Ruzicka wanted to know if GPAC has any force of law.
C/Schey indicated that it does. It is basically Constitutional. They city can't approve projects
without it, nor can they go against it.
C/Ruzicka indicated that the General Plan plan is more than just a broad view of the city's future.
C/Schey responded that it is not intended to dictate or narrow the viewpoint, but to establish
policies that the city will use as to its development. Along with that, there are ordinances and
various codes that work in concert with the General Plan to dictate what goes on. To be
approved by October, the documents would need to be written by August to begin the hearing
process.
C/Ruzicka asked what resources were most important.
C/Schey responded that land use, open space and recreational issues are in the general plan and
should be looked at by the Commissionso that they can forward them to the GPAC so they know
the Commission's concepts.
C/Tye wondered what about the current development at Golden Springs and Torito Ln. and how
it corresponded to the General Plan.
C/Schey responded that the application was done prior to all the General Plan upheaval.
C/Goldenberg indicated that C/Schey's report had been informational. He wished that more
progress had been made so the Commission could start work on the Parks Master Plan.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
4. Fifth Anniversary Celebration
CSD/Rose thanked C/Medina for his efforts with the 5th Anniversary and thanked the
staff, especially Recreation, for the time and effort they put in at the Fun Zone and
elsewhere they were needed.
C/Medina also thanked staff for the work done on the 5th Anniversary.
Chair/Goldenberg thanked Marla, Bob and Sandy for their efforts for the 5th Anniversary
and disbanded the Ad Hoc Committee.
5. Recreation Program Update
RS/Pearlman reported on the following items:
The Track Meet was held last Saturday. There were over 150 children who participated
in the event. Those who qualified will be able to attend the SCMAF meet on May 7 at La
Puente.
The Diamond Bar High School Key Club did an excellent job volunteering for both the
Track Meet and the 5th Anniversary.
Local vendors donated certificates, prizes and supplies for the 5th Anniversary. They
included:
Round Table Pizza
K -Mart
Coco's
Burger King
Youth Basketball coaches are still needed. Registration for the program is scheduled for
May 7 at Sycamore Canyon Park. Residents are scheduled from 9am - 12 noon and Non-
residents can register from 12 noon - 3 pm.
Information for the Summer Brochure was submitted with over 200 classes being offered.
New facilities include Dean Homes Swim Club and School of Music.
CSD/Rose added that schools have called to say how happy they were with the Track and
Field program. Diamond Bar finished first in last year's S.G.V.M.AA. event. This year
there was great participation. The level of professionalism shown was very good. The
event is representative of health concerns expressed by the Community.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
C/Tye contacted Robbins Precast, but they will not donate benches for Heritage Park In
addition, C/Tye asked why Peterson Park is like a Marsh? Can a correction be made in regards to
drainage?
CSD/Rose indicated that the City has ordered 2 park benches and a matching trash receptacle for
Heritage Park. In regards to Peterson Park it has a grade of 1-1/2% to 2% grade. Chris Krug a
drainage consultant tried to find a happy medium, but the problem is major. There is a compacted
Clay soil condition. It is a problem that can be solved with mosey. We could tum down the
water, but places that have proper drainage are adversley affected.
C/Tye There are also drainage problems at Paul C. Grow Park near the pitchers mound on the
field near the parking ,lot.
CSD/Rose indicated that he will look into it with the maintenance company.
C/Schey thanked Maria for the ample notice regarding baseball sign-ups. He also has some
complaints regarding the sprinklers along Diamond Bar & Grand Ave in the medians. He wanted
to know if it was possible to move the timers so that they go off later at night or reposition the
heads so they are not facing the street.
C/Medina thanked staff for the 5th Anniversary Celebration. He also asked CSD/Rose about
certificates of Appreciation for the performers and the donors of banners. • He also wanted to
incorporate more recreation programs for Seniors, such as, Bowling. The city would not
encumber a lot and Oaktree Lanes would provide a reduced rate for a league. He would also like
to see a Tennis Tournament to showcase seniors, children, and adults. The program would be
self-supporting because of entry fees. He also asked about a spanner banner.
Chair/Goldenberg indicated that the Commission has discussed spnwer banners before and they
represent a liability.
* hair/Goldenberg thanked doth Larry Ryan of RJM Design Group, Inc. and Councilmember
Ansari for attending the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by C/ Schey, seconded C/ Rusicka and carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:45
p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Bob Rose
Bob Rose, Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Mike Goldenberg
Mike Goldenberg, Chairman
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE DIAMOND BAR PARKS
AND RECREATION COMbIISSION HELD ON THURSDAY MARCH 24, 1994 AT
7:00 P.M. IN THE HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
CALL TO ORDER
Commissioner Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL
Commissioner Ruzicka indicated that C/Schey would be late in arriving.
Present: Commissioners, Tye, Goldberg, Medina, Ruzicka,
Chirman Schey arrived at 8:45 p.m.
Staff: Community Services Director Bob Rose, Administrative Assistant
Sandy Barlow, and Recreation Supervisor Marla Pearlman
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None
COMMISSION REORGANIZATION - Moved to the end of the Agenda
OLD BUSINESS
A. Design of Pantera Park
CDS/Rose introduced Mr. Bob Meuting of R.J.M. Design Group to present
the up -date on the conceptual master plan for Pantera Park as determined
from the March 17, 1994 workshop which was held to attain a consensus for
the design of Pantera Park.
Bob Meuting of R.J.M. Design Group summarized the four tables of
participants as follows:
Tables 1-3 in favor of Plan B-1 with the following modifications
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
1. Two informal fields
2. Move the parking to the south
3. The water feature to be 150' X 150'
4. One developed field and one undeveloped field
5. The southern field to have 300' outfield radius
6. Covered picnic area
Table 4 in favor of Plan B-2 with the following modifications
1. Tot lot to be like Plan B-1
2. Move the parking to the south
3. Parking with 150 stalls
4. One formal field and one informal field
5. Paved trail 8 feet wide
R.J.M. Design Group offered the following mitigative measures to answer the
concerns raised and an inquiry by C/Schey regarding the concern of traffic
and visibility of the parking across the street. The measures were designed
allowing for the given draining conditions of the park's topography.
1. Moving the parking to the south as far as possible, creating a cul-de-
sac at each end and allowing for a drop off area for the Community
Center and the rest room facility.
2. Controlling the access of the park to one location.
3. Using a combination of berming and landscaping to screen cars.
4. The outfield is shown at 250 feet because of the slope conditions and
proximity to the road and the encroachment to the parking area. If
a 300 foot field were used then there would be concerns with grading
and drainage. Also, fencing the fields for safety.
5. The soccer field was turned for better usage.
6. Water element designed as a passive element for aesthetics only using
a retention area which also allows for lesser expense in regards to
maintenance of the feature.
7. Fencing certain areas for liability.
8. Revised orientation for the court area, two tennis courts, multipurpose
court and a dedicated basketball court to allow for optimal grading
usage and drainage.
9. Picnic tables in canyon area.
10. Because of drop in elevation of Pantera Drive the landscaping was
designed to provide a screen.
R.J.M. remarked that certain considerations should be made including the
fact that the retention area is in a Los Angeles County Flood Control
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
easement, the expense of a retention pond, the field and light orientation and
the possibility of hazard to passing motorists, the risk management issue
regarding safety and liability. with the water feature which has a 5 to 1 drop
in elevation, the orientation of the tennis courts to take advantage of the
optimal north/south orientation, and a chain link fence to separate the Tot -Lot
area from the water element. At this point the Commission recessed for the
Commissioners to review the exhibits of the consensus plans being presented.
The Commission reconvened at 8:02 p.m.
C/Ruzicka expressed a concern for safety pertaining to the water element in regards to
unattended children and the cost of maintenance.
C/Goldenberg requested the proposed size of the public facility.
CSD/Rose explained thet it would be approxiamtely 7,500 square feet. 1,000 square feet
of concession/restroom and 6,500 square feet of Community Center.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Al Perez, 703 Pantera Drive, questioned the apparent concern for the safety of the water
element versus the remaining park elements. Mr. Perez believes that all the elements carry
with them a safety concern.
C/Ruzicka indicated that he wanted to be on record as having a concern for safety
regarding the water element.
Candy Holden, 608 Shy Court, indicated that she likes the water feature with a perimeter
fence and the backstops for the ballfields due to the issue of liability. She and her family
will look forward to using the picnic area and enjoying the water element.
Larry Holden, 608 Shy Court, stated that if the meetings were democratic we would have
a natural park. Property values increase with a natural park. He wants the water feature.
If one tennis court and one basketball court were removed the City would have enough
money for maintenance.
Peggy Stamboulian, 842 S. Pantera, wants to know when the issue of lights will be
discussed.
CSD/Rose stated that that would be part of the CUP process.
Deborah Lee, 23710 Prospect Valley, indicated that she likes the park and the water
element. She has been a Diamond Bar resident since 1963 and wants to see more sports
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
facilities.
Donovan Martinez, 635 Pantera Drive, requested that those in attendance be notified if the
plan changes.
CSD/Rose indicated that if there were major changes to the design they would be notified
and also that comments would be welcomed at the Planning Commission and the City
Council level.
C/Schey added that the Planning Commission would be holding a public hearing so notice
would be given to residents within 600 ft. of the park site.
Lighting
CSD/Rose stated that the hard court areas of parks are typically lit in addition to the
standard security lighting placed on walkways throughout the park. Prior to discussing
lighting the fields, a concern has been expressed regarding the orientation of the ballfields.
As the plan was designed, the informal field is in the Northeast portion of the park.
Community input at the public meetings placed it there because of the location of the house
on the Northeast corner of the park and also because it places the formal field farther
away from other houses on Pantera Drive. The Commission would like to move the
formal field from the South to the Northeast for several reasons, including grade and
optimum orientation for play. In order to mitigate the concerns expressed with the
formal field positioned in the N.E. corner, the tot lot would be protected by fencing. In
addition, the corner house is 375' from home plate. By comparison Peterson Park measures
360' from the home plate to the fence.
Burt Stamboulian, 759 Bowcreek, indicated that he does not want lighted ball fields.
Al Perez, 703 Pantera, does not want lighting due to the type of people a lighted field
attracts.
Deborah Lee, 23710 Prospect Valley, would like to see lighted fields to allow practice for
youth programs which would terminate at 9:15 p.m.
Donovan Martinez, 635 Pantera Drive, discussed the difference between a passive and
fielded park. He does not want lights due to parks location inside a residential area.
Candy Holden, 608 Shy Court, does not want lighted fields.
Larry Holden, 608 Shy Court, if lights are installed, can the Sheriff's Department get to
the park fast enough to prevent problems?
CSD/Rose explained that the pathways in the park are large enough to drive a full size
pick up truck on and staff would allow access to emergency personnel.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
Peggy Stamboulian, 842 Pantera Drive, does not like the concept of a lighted facility
because people will shoot out the lights and they could possibly miss and hit a window or
house.
CSD/Rose indicated that most people discussed the issue of ballfield lighting and now would
like to, know their opinions on lighting the hard court areas.
Chair/Schey added that the parking lot, and park, and building would have security
lighting, but what about the tennis and basketball areas.
Paula De Mateo, 23477 Gold Nugget, agreed that the fields should not be lit because of
the parks location in a residential area. It is not the right park to light at night.
C/Ruzicka asked for input from the public on the positioning of the ballfields.
Al Perez, 703 Pantera Drive, indicated that he questioned the flip flop of the fileds because
of the tot lot, but if mitigation measures could be developed he would not mind.
Bob Meuting of RJM Design Group, Inc. indicated that he could design a fence that
would somewhat shield the tot lot from the ballfield.
CSD/Rose asked if their was any opposition to flip flopping the ballfields, having lighted
hard court areas, but not lighted ballfields.
The audience indicated that lighting the hard court areas and not the ballfields would be
acceptable.
The motion was made by C/Schey to forward RJM's design, including the reorientated
ballfields, an informal backstop placed on the second field, a fence around the tot lot, and
the mitigative measures discussed by RIM prior to the public comments, to the Planning
Commission, seconded by C/Tye.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES: All
NOES: 0
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
The Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. to allow for those wishing to hear only the Pantera
Park portion of the meeting to leave. The Commission reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
COMMISSION REORGANIZATION
Moved by Raul Medina and seconded by Mike Goldenberg to nominate Mr. Ruzika
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
as Chairman.
The Motion failed with the following vote:
AYES: 2
NOES: 3
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Moved by Joe Ruzicka and seconded by David Schey to nominate Mr. Goldenberg
as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES: All
NOES: 0
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Moved by Mike Goldenberg and seconded by Steve Tye to nominate Mr. Ruzika
as Vice Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES: All
NOES: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
ABSENT:
Chair/Schey turned the meeting over to Chair/Goldenberg.
Chair/Goldenberg commented that Chair/Schey and VC/Johnson were the best.
mentors he had ever had, and commended them on performance as commissioners.
NEW BUSINESS
CSD/Rose reported that effective April 1, 1994, the Brown Act will no longer allow
standing sub -committees to be formed at the Commission level which act on a
variety of subjects dealing with business throughout the year without proper noticing
and the preparation of minutes. A sub -committee is normally two members of the
commission, a staff member, and possibly members of the public and/or consultants.
The sub -committee then works on the subject doing research or other input and
brings back issues to the Commission for the review of the entire Commission. The
most conservative approach to the interpretation of the Brown Act would be having
no sub -committees with staff handling all, with minor input. A middle ground
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
approach to the formation of sub -committees is that the newly formed sub-
committees be for specific projects and at the end of project they be dissolved.
This type of sub -committee eliminates noticing requirements by staff. At this time
staff recommends that sub -committees be formed for the (1) Fifth Anniversary
Celebration and (2) The Maple Hill Park A.D.A. Retro -fit.
VC/Ruzika commented that the standing user group sub -committee sends notices and
does minutes of its work two times a year. Therefore, this standing sub -committee
adds no more staff time than is already allocated.
Chair/Goldenberg commented that there would be no disbanding of the standing sub-
committees, but if they are maintained, then they must comply with the Brown Act
standards.
CSD/Rose responded that the intention was to disband all standing sub -committees
and the only sub -committees established in their place would be the two
recommended, Fifth Anniversary Celebration and The Maple Hill Park A.D.A Retro-
fit. As issues come forward then other temporary sub -committees would be formed
to deal with those issues.
Chair/Goldenberg asked if this was consistent with City Council's sub -committees.
CSD/Rose responded that the City Council has made no decision on this issue.
Chair/Goldenberg asked if the City Manager, Mr. Belanger had made any
recommendations to any other Commissions.
CSD/Rose said he and CM/Belanger spoke regarding the Parks and Recreation
Commission only and that the recommendations were as previously stated. As to
C/Ruzika's recommendation that the user sub -committee be a standing sub -committee,
CDS/Rose agreed that staff currently complies with the Brown Act requirements and
only minor amounts of staff's time would be needed to comply with the remaining
requirements.
C/Schey asked if it was necessary to do noticing and minutes requirements on the
temporary sub -committees forms.
CSD/Rose responded that temporary sub -committees did not have these requirements.
C/Ruzicka questioned the time length of sub -committees as to whether or not this
was a qualification as a sub -committee.
CSD/Rose responded that with the spirit of the act, the scope of the sub -committee
is being defined to a specific area. For instance, A.D.A. Retro -fit is defined to
Maple Hills Park not a City-wide ADA Retro -fit so the connotation of the time
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
frame is limited. As better definition and interpretation is obtained then adjustments
can be made to comply.
Chair/Goldenberg interjected that a revision to the revision is in the works right
now.
C/Schey asked what would happen if the Chairman assigned two Commissioners to
meet with the User Groups and continually assigned the same two Ciommissioners.
Would that be considered a sub -committee?
CSD/Rose responded that with the current interpretation the sub -committee as
described would not constitute a requirement for noticing as a sub -committee. As
soon as the Commission sees that work needs to be done, then a new temporary
committee should be formed that will dissolve at the end of its project. The scope
of the project will be limited so it is defined to a specific task.
C/Medina asked what if the task of the committee is a three year project.
CSD/Rose responded that this is okay, as long as the task is defined.
Chair/Goldenberg indicated that it is not a continuing task such as the user sub-
committee, but a specific task or project.
C/Medina wanted to add a user group sub committee to the staff recommendation.
C/Ruzika commented that having the user group as .a standing committee of which
he would like to be the chairman so that continuity would be served for the City
and the Community.
CSD/Rose responded that the wording could be revised to establish the following ad-
hoc committees, Fifth Anniversary Celebration and the Maple Hill Park A.D.A.
Retro -fit, and to establish the following standing sub -committee which would be the
user group sub -committee. The Commission could then assign members to those
committees tonight. The user committee would then require the noticing and
minutes according to the Brown Act.
C/Schey indicated that he would like to be on the Maple Hill Park A.D.A. retrofit
Committee.
Chair/Goldenberg asked if the committees could be reviewed by staff and brought
back before the Commission in April.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
Moved by C/Schey, seconded by C/Ruzicka and carried unanimously to accept staff's
recommendation to establish the Fifth Anniversary Celebration and the Maple Hill
Park A.D.A. Retro -fit sub -committees and the standing committee for user groups
and to have the Commission staff those committees at the direction of the Chairman.
The Motion carried with the following vote:
AYES:
All
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
None
The sub -committees consist of the following appointments per Chair/Goldenberg:
Fifth Anniversary Celebration
C/Medina and Chair/Goldenberg
Maple Hill Park A.D.A Retro -fit
C/Schey and VC/Ruzika
Standing Committee for the User Group
C/Schey and VC/Ruzika
C/Schey suggested that since he has been on GPAC he would like to continue to
represent the Commission on that Committee. He would relinquish his appointment
to the Maple Hill Park A.D.A. Retro -fit, but maintain the appointment for the
Standing Committee for the User Group.
Chair/Goldenberg suggested that C/Tye take the appointment of Maple Hill Park
A.D.A Retro -fit and representative for GPAC Committee. With his concurrence the
list of appointments were re -organized as follows:
Fifth Anniversary Celebration
C/Medina and Chair/Goldenberg
Maple Hill Park A.D.A Retro -fit
C/Tye and VC/Ruzika
Standing Committee for the User Group
C/Schey and VC/Ruzika
GPAC Committee Representatives
C/Tye and C/Schey
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
COMMISSIONER HANDBOOKS
C/Goldenberg requested that the handbooks be spiral bound and AA/Barlow
agreed that a revised copy would be provided.
ARBOR DAY CELEBRATION - March 13, 1994
CSD/Rose provided the following report: On March 13, 1994 an Arbor Day
Celebration was held at Peterson Park where ninety five (95) fifteen gallon
trees as well as one (1) twenty-four inch box tree were planted. In
conjunction with that a group of volunteers, headed by Don Schad, planted
approximately fifty (50) pine trees on the slope area. The large trees are
part of the SR60 project and all planted trees are doing well at this time.
Over fifty volunteers participated and a good time was had by all.
FIFTH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION - April 17, 1994
C/Medina reported that so far seven groups are participating including a
Korean and Japanese group. The banners will be flown at the entrances to
the city. Two places, Oak Tree Lanes and First Interstate Bank are
sponsoring the banners. Burger King has also committed to sponsoring a
banner.
CSD/Rose reported that the event is scheduled for Sunday, April 17, 1994,
at Peterson Park from, 1:00 p.m. until dusk, and is being presented as a
muti-cultural event with entertainment signifying the various cultures
performed on stage. Booths are being planned to provide either cultural
information or possibly food as representation of the various cultures.
AA/Barlow listed for the Commissioners a variety of activities which have
been planned including: Children's Fun Zone with pony rides, petting zoo,
moon bounce, and recreational activities organized by Recreation Staff such
as three-legged races, balloon toss, tug-of-war, and face painting. Also, a
cake cutting ceremony will be held in the afternoon and country -western
music and dancing will be held in the evening.
CSD/Rose commented that the Quail Summit School is having a Walk-a-Thon
that same day which ends at Peterson Park. Also, the next scheduled sub-
committee meeting for the Fifth Anniversary Celebration is March 31 at
12:00 noon at City Hall. Diamond Bar Improvement Association has donated
$600.00 for this event.
RECREATION PROGRAM UP -DATE
Parks & Recreation Conunission Minutes of March 24, 1994
RS/Pearlman reported that the Recreation program for the winter will be
completed soon. March 31 is the last day for most of the sessions. We
have surpassed our goal by $185.00. Registration is still coming in for the
Winter session. There has been a slight problem with the School District
and the opening of facilities.
The youth track and field meet is being planned for April 23, 1994, at
Diamond Bar High School and many requests for information have been
coming in from the various schools. Concessions are being planned by
Diamond Bar High School as a fund raiser. Two volunteers from each
school will be utilized to help run the event.
Recruitment for staff to work the Youth Baseball Program ended March 23,
1994. Staff is in the process of going through the applications at this time.
Regarding the Fifth Anniversary Celebration program, RS/Pearlman
commented that she is hoping to get volunteers for the activities and has
asked the Lorabeer Cheerleaders and students from St. Lucy's to participate
in the face painting booths to help them earn volunteer hours.
Staff shirts have been ordered.
C/Goldenberg asked the start of the track meet and was told 9:00 a.m.
CSD/Rose up -dated the Commission on the Tiny Tots Program commenting
that recently a co-ordinator was hired, but she will be moving on at the end
of the session. Staff is currently looking to hire a teaching aid to assist our
instructor. The pay is hourly and ranges from $6.00 to $7.00. Enrollment
is in process.
AA/Barlow reported that the recent adult excursions included a trip to the
International Orchid Show in Santa Barbara. It was a success and staff was
requested to do it again next year. The next excursion goes to the Nixon
Library which includes lunch and a bus trip. In May there is a Catalina trip
and the trip scheduled for the third week in May journeys to the Temecula
Wineries. The sign ups are proceeding very well.
The senior program is going well and the center is filling up to capacity on
Tuesday meeting days, as well as the other days when classes are offered.
Mt. San Antonio College should be getting their new schedule of classes to
us soon. Their next session begins the end of May. Last Friday there was
an Easter Hat Decorating Day. Local Merchants donated many supplies.
The seniors will model their creations at the Easter luncheon where
representatives of the City Council will be the judges. Lilian has been
Parks &c Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
responsible for locating donors to provide prizes for the event. The Whole
Enchilada will cater the event for free.
C/Ruzicka asked if there was a membership requirement.
AA/Barlow responded that there has been a hold placed on any new
memberships because of size.
C/Ruzicka asked if the organization provides other benefits than the Tuesday
meeting if they are full.
Chair/Goldenberg indicated that the whole concept of their program is
meeting, providing socialization and being together.
AA Barlow added that in terms of Tuesday, the Center is full, but other
activities are being planned which will provide socialization for
can come on days in addition to Tuesday. ,ved people who
both community members and staff are looking intoovalternative locations the rthat
will provide for the whole group.
CDS/Rose commented that the group of Seniors using Heritage Park currently
is a private organization. They l
are working with staff to establish a pubic
. At this
Senior Program for not only this group but new members as well
time we are applying for a grant for a nutrition program through the Area
Agency on Aging. If we are awarded the grant, then funds would be
available and a rotation of use would be feasible.
CSD/Rose continued that staff is looking over many co-operative efforts
including moving a nutrition program from this site to another facility part
of the week. This program would be covered by the grant. Staff is looking
into leasing space. Staff is open to suggestions.
Chair/Goldenberg questioned the status of benches for Heritage Park.
CSD/Rose responded that there is a possibility of DBIA making a donation.
Chair/Goldenberg asked about the re -striping for additional parking.
CSD/Rose responded that he had contacted Public Works to study the area.
C/Tye asked who provided the benches on Diamond Bar Blvd.
CSD/Rose responded that those present on the street were provided by the
bus company as a part of their contract. Since that time the company has
gone through a re -organization and no additional benches will be
narks & donated.
Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
Additional benches would cost the City approximately $460.00 each.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
C/Tye commented that he was approached by a citizen who would like to see
a neighborhood park in the vicinity of Washington at Lincoln and bordered
by Cottonwood Lane across from the mobile home park.
CSD/Rose agreed staff would look into the item.
C/Medina commented that Burger King would like to put up a banner.
CSD/Rose responded that this type of banner is called a spanner banner.
Spanner banners have both a liability and are an aesthetics issue that must
be considerd. The type the City uses are informational vertical banners.
Community groups are welcomed to use the vertical banners for information
purposes through the City.
ADJOURNMENT
10:45 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Bob Rose
Bob Rose
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ Mike Goldenberg
Mike Goldenberg
Chairman
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M ORA N p Q M
Mayor Werner and Councilaber Ansari *1
PROM:
OM: emLinda G. Magnuson;�A�Accountinq Manager
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, July 19, 1994
DATE: July 12, 1994
Attached are the Voucher Registers dated July 19, 1994. You will
notice there are two voucher registers. This is due to the Fiscal
Year ending June 30.
There is a register for expenditures
allocated toFY93-94 and one
is submitting or FY94-95. As requested, the
Finance Department
Finance Committee's review and a g the voucher registers for the
approval prior to their entry on the
Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listings of vouchers dated July 19, 1994 have been
reviewed, approved, and recommended for payment. Payments are
hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
001
General Fund
$248,534.67
112
Prop A Fund
1,987.50
118
Air Quality Mgt. Fund
4,800.00
125
CDBG Fund
2,620.22
138
LLAD #38 Fund
18,437.33
139
LLAD #39 Fund
2,191.28
141
LLAD #41 Fund
5,646.06
225
Grand Ave Const Fd
3,050.00
250
CIP Fund
171.687.84
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$458,954.90
APPROVED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
Accounting Manager
rr,� j
errence L. Belanger
City Manager
Gary' H
Mayor
Eileen R. Ansari
Councilmember
**+� City of Diamond Bar
AKIN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* * PREPAID *
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
AT & T
AT&T
001-4090-2125
43 407198
07/12 06/30
Long Dist Phne Svcs -June
7.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
7.56
Accurate Landscape
Accurate
138-4535-2210
30 40719A
07/12 06/30
33147
Gen Maint Dist #38
800.35
119-4539-2210
40 40719A
07/12 06/30
33148
Irrigation Suppl-Dist #39
135.44
001-4319-2210
24 40719A
07/12 06/30
33149
Supplies -Peterson Prk
366.24
001-4322-2210
18 40719A
07/12 06/30
33150
Supplies -Ron Reagan Prk
176.25
001-4316-2210
16 40719A
07/12 06/30
33151
Supplies -Maple Hill Prk
412.69
001-4311-2210
15 40719A
07/12 06/30
33152
Maint-Paul Grow Prk
67.90
138-4538-2210
32 40719A
07/12 06/30
33170
Irrigation Maint-Dist #38
36.00
138-4538-2210
34 40719A
07/12 06/30
33171
Fertilize Trees Dist #38
1,679.00
001-4310-1200
71 40719A
07/12 06/30
33215
Supplies -Parks
314.76
001-4322-2210
17 40719A
07/12 06/30
33215
Supplies -Ron Reagan Prk
160.00
138-4538-2210
31 40719A
07/12 06/30
33r6
Gopher Control Dist #38
X0.04
138-4538-5500
16 40719A 14/1577
07/12 06/30
33296
June Maint Dist #38
3,648.80
138-4538-2210
33 W719A 10/1576
07/12 06/30
33297
June Maint Dist #38
5,920.22
139-4539-5500
16 40719A
07/12 06/30
33297
Goph/Squirl Contrl Dist -39
750.00
001-4311-5300
24 40719A 06/1666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint Paul Grow
1,100.00
001-4316-5300
24 40719A 04/1666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint-Maple Hill Prk
900.00
001-4319-5300
27 40719A 01/1666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint-Peterson
1,200.00
001-4322-5300
24 40719A 03/1666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint-Ron Reagan
1,000.00
001-4r;<5-5300
24 40719A 0511666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint Starshine Prk
500.00
001-4323-5300
16 40719A 07/1666
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint-Summitridge
1,500.00
001-4331-5300
40 40719A 0811W
07/12 06/30
33356
June Maint-Sycamore Cyn
1,600.00
001-4313-5300
31 40719A 02/1666
07/12 06/30
3356
June Maint-Heritage
750.00
Accurate Landscape Accurate
001-4310-1200 70 40719A
Amer iCoop
001-4095-4260
Aqua Backflow &
138-4538-2210
141-4541-2210
AmeriComp
22 407198 01/1907
AquaBack
35 40719E 03/1792
48 407198 04/1792
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------? 23,367.65
07/12 06/30 33425 Misc Supplies -Parks 300.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 300.50
07/12 06130 33198 HewlettPac-LaserPrinter 860.59
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 860.59
07/12 06/30 13449 Backflow Test -Dist #38 112.50
07/12 06/30 13049 Backflow Test -Dist #39 22.50
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------? 135.00
+�¢
City of Diamond Bar ��¢
RIJN TIME: 15:54 07/13/94
V O U C H
E R R E G
I S T E R t' I;
`liI PAGE
DUE THRU
.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
t PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Armentrout, Phil
Armentrout
001-4440-4040
36 40719E 01/1948
07/13 06/30
EmerCoordSvcs-6/11-25
560.00
125-4215-23`5
64 40719E 02/1948
07/13 06/30
CDBGSvcs-6/11-25
656.00
125-4215-2355
66 40719E
07/13 06/30
CDBGSvcs-6/11-25
656.00-
125-4215-2355
65 40719E
07/13 06/30
P01773
CDBGSvcs-6/11-25
308.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
86.00
B & K Electric Wholesale B&KElect
001-4311-2210
16 40719B 03/1649
07/12 06/30
411075
Electric Supplies-PaulGrw
55.50
001-4331-2210
40 407199 0411649
07/12 06/30
411076
Electric Supplies-Sycamre
75.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
130.50
BSI Consultants Inc
BSI
001-4095-2350
9 40719B 01/1831
07/12 06/30
97285
Production Comm Nwsletter
7,289.65
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,289.65
Barbosa Garcia & Barnes Barbosa
001-4020-4021
112 40719B
07/12 06/30
June Legal Svcs -DB vs DBA
69.40
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
69.40
Bill's Lock & Safe
BillsLock
001-4331-""10
41 40719C 10/1725
07/12 06/30
55390
Rekey Svcs -Sycamore Cyn
48.22
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
48.22
Brea, City of
BreaCity
001-4350-5300
22 40719E 01/1875
07/12 06/30
51497
May-JuneRecreatnSvcs
51,110.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
51,110.00
California Contract
CCCA
001-4090-2315
11 40719F
07/12 06/30
Member Dues FY 94-95
2,000.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,000.00
Chih, Ellen
1225
001-3478
372 40719A
07/12 06/30
11681
Recreation Refund
28.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
28.00
Columbia Cascade
ColumbiaCa
001-4313-2210
56 40719B 01/1843A
07/12 06/30
2538123
Benches-HrtgCommCtr
2,653.00
001-4313-2210
57 40719B
07/12 06/30
2538123
Trash Can-Hrtg Prk
17.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,670.00
#*� Citof Dia�on
RLNVTIME:11:4607/13/94 VOy U C H E R REGISd TER PAGE 3
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
-y
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. # PREPAID #
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Disposal Co. ComDisposl
001-4555-5501 13 40719B 05/I776
Community Industries CommIndust
001-4555-5503 35 40719B
Cylkowski, Virginia 1229
!.M -3478 382 40719A
D&J Engineering D&JEngine
001-4220-5201 41 40719E
001-4220-5201 40 40719E
Dept of Transportation DeptTrans
001-4555-5507 44 407198
Diamond Bar Petty
Cash Pett 1 -ash
001-4030-1100
23 40719F
001-4090-1200
70 40719F
001-4090-2120
43 40719E
001-4090-2325
35 40719F
001-4210-4220
90 40719F
001-4350-1200
111 40719F
001-4510-2325
8 40719F
DWOht French & Assoc. DwightFren
x`-4510-6411 06394 15 40719B 01/1860
138-45'8-6410 06894 281 40719B 01/1623
Fleet Call F1eetCall
001-4090-2130 69 40719B
07/12 06/30
3,050.00
June Street Sweep Svcs
7,839.72
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,244.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,839.72
07/12 06/30
158.55
June Litter Abatement
339.44
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
839.44
07/12 06/30
12017
Recreation Refund
25,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
25.00
07/12 06/30
940-006
Inspect Svcs -5/26-6/30
1,172.50
07/12 06/30
94R-007
P1nChk/B1dgSvcs-6/22-30
3,369.52
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
4,542.02
07/12 06/30
130120
April Signal/Lighting Svc
8:32.63
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
8-32.63
07/12 06/30
Cty Mgr -Supplies
9,78
07/12 06/30
Gen Govt Supplies
17.30
07/12 06/30
Gen Govt -Postage
0,40
07/12 06/30
Mtg Supplies
22,35
07/12 06/30
GPAC-Supplies
21,39
07/12 06/30
Recreation Supplies
19.12
07/12 06/30
Pub Wks-Mtg
5.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) =`6.84
07/12 06/30 10016-8,0 GrAvRehab-GSOr-SBCntyLine
3,050.00
07/12 06/30 1001681 EngDesgnSvcs-MLdian/Gona
4,194.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,244.00
07/12 06/30 June 2 Way Radio Svcs
158.55
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
158.55
++ 4
C i t y o
f D i a m a
n d B a r +++
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94
V 0 U C H
E R R E G
I S T E R
PAGE 4
DUE THRU
.............07/19/94
t'
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
+ + PREPAID + +
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOlM1T DATE CHECK
Furuken, Gloria
1218
001-3478
365 40719A
07/12 06/'30
11321
Recreation Refund
24.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
24.(Y)
Furuk:en, Gloria
1230
001-3478
381 40719A
07/12 06/30
12014
Recreation Refund
27.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
27.00
GTE
GTEL
001-4090-2130
70 407198
07/12 06/30
EquipRentStel90-/94-7/94
388.44
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
888.44
GTE California
GTE
001-4090-2125
44 407198
07/12 06/30
June Gen Phone Svcs
2,543.49
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,543.49
GTE California
GTE
001-4319-2125
2 40719E
07/12 06/30
June Phone Svcs-PetrsnPrk
40.99
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.99
GTE California
GTE
001-4440-2125
31 40719B
07/12 06/30
June Phone Svcs-EmerPrep
38.62
TOTAL DUE,VENDOR--------)
38.62
GTE California
GTE
001-4040-2125
24 407198
07/12 06/30
Modus Services
16.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
16.80
GTE California
GTE
001-4331-2125
25 40719C
07/12 06/30
Install/PhneSvcs-Recreatn
451.65
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
451.65
Gonzalez, Margie
1215
001-3478
369 40719A
07/12 06/30
11738
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.00
Graffiti Control
Systems GrafitiCon
001-4555-5520
31 40719D
07/12 06/30
db0694
June Graffiti Removal
2,064.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,064.00
�*}
City of
Diamond
Bar *+��
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94
V 0 U C H
E R R E G
I S T E R
PAGE 5
DILE THRU
.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
¢ PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Hagopian, David
1212
001-3474
46 40719A
07/12 06/30
11399
Recreation Refund
45.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
45.00
Hanson Corporate
Express HansonCorp
001-4510-6200
7 407198 01;1074
07/12 06/30
11255406
6 Shelf File Cabinet
468.7
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
468.72
Home Depot
HoseDepot
001-4310-1200
72 40719C 07/1795
07/12 06/30
110379
Supplies -Parks
75.34
001-4310-1200
73 40719C 08/1795
07/12 06/30
110501
Supplies -Parks
46.11
001-4310-1200
74 40719C 09!1795
07/12 06/30
110702
Supplies -Parks
41.45
001-4310-1200
77 40719C 12/1795
07/12 06/30
221365
Supplies-Parks(CrMeso)
24.b2-
001-4310-1200
75 40719C 10/1795
07/12 06/30
27(A63
Supplies -Parks
21.18
001-4310-1200
76 40719C 11/1795
07%12 06/30
270552
Supplies -Parks
63.04
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
22.50
Hwang, Hi Kyung
1219
001-3478
366 40719A
07/12 06/30
11938
Recreation Refund
45.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- }
45.00
Ige, Doreen
1228
001-3478
10 40719A
07/12 06/30
11847
Recreation Refund
36.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
36.00
Infoimage
Infoimage
118-4098-4000
8 40719C 01/.1746
07/12 06/30
0853 -IN
ProfSvcs-CtyOnLine/MISSys
3,000.00
118-4098-4000
10 40719C 01/1746
07/12 06/30
1018 -IN
ProfSvcs-CtyOnLine/MISSys
1,8911.00
TOTAL Ids VENDOR --------)
4,800.00
Inland Valley Dly
Bulletn IVD6
001-4640-2115
51 40719C
07/12 06/30
22548
Rids-CtyTreeMaint
40.83
001-4210-2115
56 40719C
07/12 06/30
27729
Pub Hrg-ADR 94-5
70.83
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
111.66
International Services IntService
001-4411-5531
22 40719C 01/1667A
07/12 06/30
010072
May Crossing Guard Svcs
6,298.43
001-4411-5531
24 40719C 01/1667A
07/12 06/30
010346
June Crossing Guard Svcs
3,959.55
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
10,257.98
t
City of
0 i a
m a n d Bar*
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94
V O U C H
E R R
E G I S T E R
PAGE 6
DJE T}RU
.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
# PREPAID #
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK:
K.amath, Bernadette
1232
001-3478
380 40719A
07/12 06/30
12020
Recreation Refund
27.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
27.00
Kim, Francine
1214
001-3478
370 40719A
07/12 06/30
11520
Recreation Refund
20.00
TOTAL DLE VENDOR --------)
20.00
Kim, Michelle
1223
001-3478
368 40719A
07/12 06/30
11433
Recreation Refund
39.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
39.00
Kia, Yvonne
1224
001-3478
371 40719A
07/12 06/30
11473
Recreation Refund
97.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
97.00
L.A. County -Sheriff's
Dep LACSheriff
001-4411-5401
46 40719C
07/12 06/30
22742
May Helicopter Svcs
363.87
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
363.87
LG&E Power Engineers
LUEPower
001-4210-4240
42 40719F 01/1762
07/12 06/30
97892
Prof5vc-EnvAnlys-MRF
4,620.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
4,620.00
Landscape West
LandscapeW
001-4555-5508
35 407190 01/.1686
07/12 06/30
013554
June Weed Abatement
4,561.84
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
4,561.84
Lithographics
Lithograph
001-4350-4300
4 40719C 01/1891
07/12 06,30
104945
Flyers-ConcertInPark
521.51
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- }
521.51
MMASC
MMASC
001-4090-2315
10 40719F
07/12 06/30
FY 94-95 Dues-Butzlaff
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.00
Martus, Elsie
1217
001-3478
364 4071'3A
07/12 06/30
11794
Recreation Refund
175.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
175.00
+
City of
Diamond
Bar#
RUNTIME: 114507%13;'94
VOUCHER
REGISTER
PAGE 7
DUE THRU.............07119/94
-
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Mearns, Marilyn
1216
011-3478
373 40719A
07112 06/30
11669
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
40.00
Microage
Microage
001-4045-4260
24 40719C 01/1909
07/12 06/30
12967
AMTComputer-EconDvlpmnt
1,786.13
TOTAL DILE VENDOR --------)
1,78-6.13
Mitchell Pest Control
Inc MitchellPe
001-4555-5509
46 40119E
07/12 06/30
15973
Street Tree Inspection
60.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
60.00
Mobil
Mobil
001-4310-2200
21 40719D 01/1923
07/12 06/30
2792
P&R Truck Repairs
W.59
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
268.59
Nagy, Caroline
1239
001-3478
375 40719A
07/12 06/30
11882
Recreation Refund
39.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
39.00
Nilsson, Virginia
1243
001-3478
376 40719A
07/12 06/30
11978
Recreation Refund
14.00
TOTAL DUE.VENDOR--------)
14.00
Nolte & Assiciates Inc NolteAssc
250-4510-6411 06494
28 40719D 01µ807
07/12 06/30
3^40115
StreetImprv-DBar/Grd
032,676.62
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
32,676.62
Norco Alarms Inc
NorcoAlarm
001-4350-6250
10 40719D 01/1879
07/12 06/30
4614
SecuritySys-SycCynPrk
395.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
385.00
GCB Reprographics
OCBReprogr
250-4x10-6415 06594
101 40719D 34/1637
07/12 06/30
828167
Blackline-Pantera Park
51.72
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
51.72
Orange Blossom Lines
OrangeBlos
112-4360-5314
40 40719D 01/1882
07/12 06/30
10480
Transp-MarineCorpSand
412.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
4142.50
f*+ City of Diamond Bar +f4
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
IVENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paris, Norma 1211
001-3474 45 40719A
Perry Mannes Industries PerryManes
250-4510-6411 06794 31 40719D 01/1893
Petres, Dale 1220
001-3474 47 40719A
Pomona Industrial Medical PomIndMed
001-4350-0080 44 40719D
001-4090-4000 40 40719D
Pomona Vly Transportation PomonaVly
112-4360-5310 43 40719F
112-4360-5310 42 40719D
112-4360-5310 41 40719D
Rana, Shachi RanaS
001-2300-1010 158 40719A
001-3443 27 40719A
07/12 06/30
11202
Recreation Refund
45.00
001-4313-2210
59 407190 01/1913
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
45.00
07/12 06/30
5373
ModifyHandicapAccessRamp
27,679.50
001-4313-2210
61 40719D 01/1903
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
27,679.50
07/12 06/30
11405
Recreation Refund
45.00
001-4551-5223
17 40719D
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
45.00
07/12 06/30
172616
PreEmplyPhys-Schmid
123.00
07/12 06/30
172804
EmplyPhysical-Hosler
131.33
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
254.33
07/12 06/30
0520
Transp-MRF Mtg 6/23
411.25
07/12 06/30
519
Transp-TinyTotsErcrsn 6/6
6-=8.75
07/12 06/30
522
Shuttles-ConInPrks
525.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,575.00
07/12 06/30
Refund FPL 94-007
1,700.00 06/30/94 OW02158•3
07/12 06/30
Ping Fee Chg Deposit
200.00- 06/30/94 0000021583
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
1,500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
Rescue Rooter
RescueRoot
Plmbg Svcs-Hrtge Prk
475.00
001-4313-2210
59 407190 01/1913
- 07/12 06/30
18047
001 -4310 -?210
g 407190 01/1900
07/12 06/30
18920
001-4313-2210
61 40719D 01/1903
07/12 06/30
18928
RonKranzer&Assoc C.E.
Inc RKA
001-4551-5223
17 40719D
07/12 06/30
2292
001-4551-5221
25 40719D
07/12 06/30
2294
(Y,jl - 4551-5221
24 407191)
07/12 06/30
2452
Sewer Repair-HrtgPrk:
3,550.00
Plmbg Svcs-Hrtge Prk
475.00
Sewer Maint-Hrtg Prk
1,425.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
5,450.00
Plan Checking Svcs
1,762.00
Engr Inspection Svcs
65.00
Engr Inspection Svcs
2,024.72
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
3,851.72
* * * City of D i a a o n d Bar * * *
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
vow NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/UE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECr:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saiz, Frank 1241
001-3478 .374 40719A
Samadi, Sarvnaz 1234
001-3473 379 40719A
San Gabriel Valley SGVCCC
001-4090-2315 12 40719F
Santamaria, Margarita 1235
001-3473 378 40719A
Savitt, Richard SavittR
001-3462 20 40719D
Siecke, Warren C. SieckeW
250-4510-6412 07294 33 407190
250-4510-6412 07194 34 407190
r;0-4510-6412 07394 32 40719D
Siecke, Warren C. SieckeW
001-4553-5222 18 407190
001-4553-5222 17 40719D
001-4553-5222 19 407190
Sierra Display Inc SierraDisp
001-4095-1200 42 40719D 01/1855
Simpler Life Emergency SimpleLife
125-4215-1200 56 40719D 01/1917
07/12 06/30
11968
Recreation Refund
57.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
57.00
07/12 06/30
12018
Recreation Refund
16.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
16.00
07/12 06/30
City Dues -FY 94-95
7,500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
7,500.00
07/12 06/30
12015
Recreation Refund
66.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
66.00
07/12 06/30
Refundable-CleanUpDeposit
250.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
250.00
07/12 06/30
3224-9
DesgnSvc-GldnPrados
833.34
07/12 06/30
3224-9
DesgnSvc-GS/Prospectrs
833.33
07/12 06/30
32249
DesgnSvc-GS/Carpio
833.33
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
2,500.00
07/12 06/30
3223-13
Trfc Engr Svcs-SpeedStudy
8,000.00
07/12 06/30
x'3225-8
Trfc Engr Svcs-GS/Adel
65.00
07/12 06/30
3225-8
TrfcEngrSvc-LeftTurnPhase
97.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
8,162.50
07/12 06/30
94105
Bannrs-CtyEntr-ConInPrk
1,088.12
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
1,088.12
07/12 06/30
09152
CDBGSuppi-Senior Prgrm
2,312.22
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
2,312.22
*¢
City of
0 1 a m
o n d Bar
RUN TIME: 1146 07/13/94
V 0 U C H
E R R E
G I S T E R
PAGE 10
DUE THRU
.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE CHECK:
Sir Speedy
SirSpeedy
001-4040-1100
38 40719E 06/1856
07/12 06/30
16103
BusCards-Burgess
54..A
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- }
54.38
Southern Ca Gas Co
SoCaGas
001-4313-2126
19 40719A
07/12 06/30
Gas Svcs - Heritage Pk
51.14
TOTAL M VENDOR --------}
51.14
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
001-4555-2126
21 40719E
07/12 06/30
JuneElect5vcs-TrffcContrl
915.51
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
915.51
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
138-4538-2126
40 40719E
07/12 06/30
JuneElectSvcs-Dist #38
374.52
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
374.52
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
141-4541-2126
26 40719E
07/12 06/30
JuneElectSvcs-Dist #41
32.38
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
32.38
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
001-4313-2126
18 40719E
07/12 06/30
JuneElectSvcs-Hrtge Prk
1,291.64
001-4322-2126
18 40719E
07/12 06/30
JuneElectSvcs-RonReagan
535.96
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
1,827.60
Thacker, Alma
1236 ..
001-3478
377 40719A
07/12 06/30
12019
Recreation Refund
10.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
10.00
The Balloon Gallery
BalloonGal
001-4:150-5305
51 40719A
07/12 06/30
BalloonTowers6/29ConInPrk
135.41
06/20/94 0000021585
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----1
135.41
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------?
0.00
The Signman
TheSignman
001-4210-4240
40 40719D 01/1901
07/12 06/30
94194
Banners -Environmental
749.09
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------3
749.09
* * * City of Diamond Bar * * *
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
DUE THRU.............07/19/94 �� i e
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID * #
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Traffic Control Operation TrafficOp
001-4090-2210 30 40719E 01/1899
Uni Shippers Association UniShipper
001-4510-2120 3 40119E
Usher, Frank UsherF
001-4030-2330 30 40719C
Walnut Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis
141-4541-2126 27 40719E
Walnut Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis
138-4538-2126 41 40719E
Walnut Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis
001-432-2126 19 40719E
001-4325-2126 7 40719E
Wang, David 1213 ..
001=3478 _i6:3 40719A
Wendoll, Donna 1221
001-3478 367 40719A
Werner, Gary WernerGarJ
(1t)1-4010-2330 49 40719E
07/12
06/30
33305
Removal of City Sign
450.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
450.00
07/12
06/30
000:1408
Air•ExpressSvcs-Engr
7.95
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
7.95
07/12
06/30
Reimb-AB1290/League/--Q A
20.57
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------?
80.57
07/12
06/30
WaterSvc-Dist41 4/27-6/22
4,285.35
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
4,285.05
07/12
06/30
WaterSvc-Dist38 5/:31-6/30
16.11
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
16.11
07/12
06J30
WaterSvc-RonReagn
1,171.55
07/12
06/30
WaterSvc-Starshine
896.15
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
2,067.70
07112
06/30
11756
Recreation Refund
34.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------?
34.00
07/12
06/30
115
Recreation Refund
16.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
16.00
07/12
06/30
Reimb-SB2969 Hrg 6/21
30.95
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
30.95
41# City of Diamond Bar **+
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 12
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. PREPAID #
ACCOUNT F%J.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINEMO. ENTRY/[a INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
West Coast Arborist Inc. OCArbor
001-4555-5509 45 40719E
Whole Enchilada WholeEnchl
0014350-5305 53 40719E 01/1833
07/12 06/30 8564 Removal of Tree Stump
190.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
190.00
07/12 06/S* 648884 ConInPrkMeal-Marines 6/29
261.24
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
261.24
TOTAL PREPAID -----------)
1,635.41
TOTAL DUE --------------->
2'51,090.18
TOTAL REPORT ------------)
252,726.19
f}� City of Diamond Bar 4
RUN TIFF: 11:57 07/13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R _ PAGE I
DUE THRU.............07119/94
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
07/12 07/19
* * PREPAID * *
ACCOUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
3CMA
3CMA
Bustos, Gilbert
BustosG
001-4010-2395
1 50719A 07/12 07/19
Savvy Awards-SdwlkCtyHall
75.1N) 07/19/94 0000021584
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
75.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
ARA/Cary Refreshment Svcs ARA
001-4090-2325
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
'332645
July Mtg Supplies
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------J
Bustos, Gilbert
BustosG
001-2300-1002
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
Refund-HrtgCommCtrDeposit
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------
Cody Bryant Band
CodyBryant
0014350-5305
21 50719A 01/1887
07/12 07/19
Band 7/27-ConInPrk
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Eastman Inc.
Eastman
001-4050-1100
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
012596236
CrMeeo-Finance
001-4210-1100
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
012596237
CrMemo-Ping
001-4090-1200
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
012596238
CrMemo-Gen Govt
001-43`50-1260
2 50719A 01/1922
07/12 07/19
012607898
Supplies-CommSvcs
001-4040-1100
1 50719A 02/1922
07/12 07/19
012607907
Supplies-CClk
:x11-4440-1200
150719A 04/1922
07/12 07/19
012607931
Supplies-EmerPrep
001-4210-1100
1 50719A 03/1922
07/12 07/19
012607943
Supplies -Ping
001-4030-1100
1 50719A 07/1922
07/12 07/19
012607959
Supplies-CMgr
001-4050-1100
1 50719A 05/1922
07/12 07/19
012607959
Supplies -Finance
001-4090-1200
1 50719A (16f1922
07/12 07/19
012607959
Supplies -Gen Govt
TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------
G
GFB-Friedrich and Assoc GFB
I38-4538-4000 3 50719A 01/1841
139-4539-4000 3 50719A 02/1841
141-4541-4000 3 50719A 03/1841
139-4,939-4000 5 50719A 02/1841
141-4541-4000 5 50719A 03/1841
133-4538-4000 5 50719A 01/1841
GFOA GFOA
001-4050-2320 1 50719A
07/12 07/19 9406-07
07/12 07/19 9406-07
01/12 07%19 9406-07
07/12 07/19 9406-09
07/12 07/19 9406-09
07/12 07/19 9406.09
07/12 07/19
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist 438
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist439
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist441
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist439
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist441
ProfEngrSvcs-Dist438
TOTAL. DUE VENDOR --------)
GAAFR Review Subscription
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
151.95
151.95
200.00
200.00
600.00
600.00
12.12-
27.47-
27.47-
87.10
364.29
43.95
310.28
12.00
290.36
16.95
1,057.87
543.00
543.00
543.00
762.84
762.83
762.83
3,917.50
50.00
50.00
City of 0 i a a o n d Bar t �
RUN TIME: 11:46 07/13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
FUND 5UMMARY REPORT � ! �-__ ;,_�
DUE THRU.............07/19;94 —
DISBURSE
G/L
GJE WILL
POST GJE HAS POSTED FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
FUND
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
DIRECT PAY
REVENUE
EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE
OrI General Fund
155,003.46
1,700.00
1,060.1x?
152,243.46
1.8 LLAD #38 Fund
17,1:31.50
17,131.50
1 !9 LLAD #39 Fund
885.44
885.44
141 LLAD 141 Fund
4,340.23
4 340.23
125 CDBG Fund
2,620.22
620.2E
215 Grand Av Const F
:,050.00
1,050.00
118 Air Quality Imp
4,6800.00
4,800.Cu)
250 C.I.P. Fund
6:,907.14
62,907.84
112 Prop A -Transit F
1,987.50
1,987.50
TOTAL------------
------------
------------
------------------------------------------------------------
ALL FUNDS
152,7126.19
1,700.00
1,060.00
149,966.19
**f City of 0 i a m o n d Bar **f
WN TIME: 11:5707/13/94 VOUCHER REGISTER PAGE
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID f n
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gonsalves & Son, Jae A. Gonsalves
001-4090-5WO
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
July Prof Svcs
2,100.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
2,100.00
Harding Lawson Associates HardingLaw
001-2300-1012
5 50719A
07/12 07/19
Refund -Bond EN 94-53
500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
500.00
ICMA
ICMA1
001-4030-230)
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
ICMA Conf 9/17-20-Belangr
525.00 07/19/94 0000021537
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
525.00
TOTAL ICE VENDOR --------)
0.00
Intl Business Equipment InBusEquip
001-4090-210
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
006230
July Xeroi Copy Charges
508.32
001-4090-2200
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
006230
July XeroYBaseMaintChrges
231.0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
729.32
konwiser, John
KonwiserJ
001-2300-1012
1 50719A
07/12 07/19
Refund-ChangeofAddressDep
850.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
850.0
LG&E Power Engineers
LG&EPower
001-2300-1010
5 50719A
07/12 07/19
97891
Prof Svcs -FPL 94-013
3,510.0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
3,510.0
Leighton and Associates
Leighton
001-2300-1012
2 50719A
07/12 07/19
82755
GeoTechReview-EN 93-19
323.40
001-230-1012
b 50719A
07/12 07/19
82756
GeoTech Review -EN 93-029
498.50
001-2300-1012
4 50719A
07/12 07/19
82759
GeoTechReview-EN 94-029
817.10
001-2,300-1012
3 50719A
07/12 07/19
82855
GeoTechReview-EN 94-052
192.0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,831.00
Mid West Coast Band
MidWestCoa
001-4350-5305
13 50719A 01/1885
07/12 07/19
Band -7/13 ConInPrk
70.0 07/19/94 00021593
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
700.0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
** City of Diamond bar *##
RUNTIME: 115707/13!94 VOUCHER REGISTER
DUE THRU.............07/19/94 F L
PAGE
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TS-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobil
001-4090-2310
001-4310-2310
001-4210-2310
001-4310-2310
001-4210-2310
001-4210-2200
001-4310-2310
001-4090-2310
Nelson, Trent
001-4350-5305
001-4350-5305
Nelson, Trent
001-4350-5.305
Nelson, Trent
001-4350-5305
Norco Alarm Inc
t%01-4331-2126
Mobil
1 50719A
3 50719A
1 50719A
1 50719A
2 50719A
1 50719A
2 50719A
2 50719A
NelsonT
15 50719A 01/1884
25 50719A 01/1884
NelsonT
23 50719A 01/1884
NelsonT
17 50719A 01/18-84
NorcoAlars
3 50719A 01/,1919
PERS Health Benefits PERSHealth
001-2110-1003 1 50719A
001-4(fK-00801 1 5071%
Payroll Transfer PayrollTr
001-1020 1 50719A
07/12
07/19
K2743565
Fuel-GenGovt
07/12
07/19
k2743705
Fuel-Prk & Rec
07/12
07/19
k2743720
Fuel -Ping
07/12
07/19
k2743871
Fuel-Prk&Rec
01/12
07/19
k2744195
Fuel -Ping
07/12
07/19
k3444313
Brakes -Ping Truck
07/12
07/19
k4846833
Fuel-Prk & Rec
07/12
07/19
k4846962
Fuel -Gen Govt
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
07/12 07/19
07/12 07/19
07/12 07/19
07/12 07/19
07/12 07/19 39753
Sound Sys-ConlnPrk7/13
Sound Sys-ConlnPrk7/27
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Sound Sys-ConInPrk 7/20
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Sound Sys-ConInPrk7/6
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
SecrtySvc-Jul,Aug,Sep
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
17.23
19.25
`1 .22
34.50
22.99
22.48
33.15
14.01
184.83
414.00 07/19/94 0000021594
414.00
414.00
414.00
414.00
414.00
414.00 07/19!94 Olk0021588
414.00
0.00
78.00
78.00
07/12 07/19 July Med Prevs 9,511.84 07/19/94 00(X)321591
07/12 07/19 Admin Fees 47.56 07/19/94 0.)10021591
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT --- 9,559.40
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------1 0.00
07/12 07/19 Payroll Transfer PP13 47,900.00 07/19/94 OW000013
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 47,900.00
TOTAL ILE VENDOR --------1 0.00
� +
City Df Diamond Bar # +
RUNTIME.' 115707/13/94
VOUCHER
REGISTER
PAGE 4
DUE THRU.............07/19/94
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
# PREPAID #
ACCOUNT PRDJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
DATE CHECK
Postage By Phone PostByPhon
001-4090-2120 1 50719A
07/12 07/19
PostageReplenishment
1,500.00
TOTAL ME VENOM --------}
1,500.00
Prudential Service Bureau PSBI
001-2110-1004 1 50719A
07/12 07/19
July Dental Prems
1,169.33
07/19/94 0000021590
001-2110-1006 1 50719A
07/12 07/19
July Vision Prems
359.23
07/19/94 CKK W21590
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
1,528.5E
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
Public Empl Retirement PERS
001 -2110 -IM 1 50719A
07/12 07/19
PP13 Retire Cont-Emplyr
2,973.99
07/19/94 00000215,39
001-2110-1008 2 50719A
07/12 07/19
PP13 Retire Cont-Emplye
3,285.31
07/19/94 0000021589
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
6,259.30
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
R & D Blueprint R&DBlue
001-2300-1010 4 50719A
07/12 07/19 10369
Maps for FPL 93-06
37.45
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
37.45
Reed, Eddy ReedEddy
001-4350-.5.305 19 50719A 01/1886
07/12 07/19
Band -7/20 ConlnPrk
500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
500.00
Robert Driver Ins Co. RobOrive
001-2300-1004 1 50719A
07/12 07/19
June Spec Event Insurance
130.00
07/19/94 0000021595
•
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
1 4.U4
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
San Gabriel Vly Tribune SGVTribune
001-4040-2115 1 50719A
07/12 07/19 07595
Pub Hrg-Gen Plan
215.04
001-4210-4220 1 50719A
07/12 07/19 15312
Pub Hrg-Gen Plan
206.08
001-4210-2115 1 50719A
07/12 07/19 23682
Pub Hrg-ADR 94-5
121.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
542.72
So Ca Assn of Governments SCAG
001-4090-2315 2 50719A
07/12 07/19
FY 94-95 Member Dues
4,011.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
4,011.00
*#* City of Diamond Bar ***
RUN TIME: 11:57 07f13/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R r PAGE
DUE THRU.............07/19/94 L 'J
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/ND. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern Ca Gas Co SoCaGas
State Compensation Ins Fd StateComp
001-2210-1011 1 50719A 07/12 07/19
001-2110-1011 2 50719A 07/12 07/19
Towne Center Travel TowneCente
001-4030-2^330 2 50719A 07/12 07/19
Walnut Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis
250-4215-6420 06795 1 50719A 07/12 07/19 7824
Wright, Paul WrightP
001-4090-4000 1 50719A 07/12 07/19
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 0.00
Wrkrs Comp Prem -8810
3,0`5.70
07/19/94 0000021592
Wrk:rs Conip Prem -9410
3,012.11
0711?/94 0(XK102-1`9
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
6,067.81
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
ICMA Conf-9/18-21-Belangr
381.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
381.00
FY94-95LseAgrmntRsvrSite
108,780.00
07/19/94 0000021586
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----1
108,780.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------f
0.00
Audio/VisualSvcs-6/28-7/5
255.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i
:'55.00
TOTAL PREPAID -----------)
182,353.07
TOTAL DUE ---------------?
23,875.64
TOTAL REPORT ------------?
206,228.71
¢f# City of Diamond Bari
RUN TIME: 11:57 07/13/94 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
FUND SUMMARY REPORT
DUE THRU.............07/19194
DISMM
G/L
GJE WILL POST U HAS POSTED FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
FUND
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
DIRECT PAY
REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE
001 General Fund
93,531.21
78,525.96
15,205.25
138 LLAD #38 Fund
1,305.83
1,305.83
139 LLAD #39 Fund
1 ,'05.$4
1,305.84
141 LLAD #41 Fund
1,305.83
1,:X15.8°„
250 C.I.P. Fund
108,780.00
108,780.00
TOTAL
------------
------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALL FUNDS
206, 28.71
78,325.96
127,902.75
CITY OF Juek Y
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. LL
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994 REPORT DATE: June 29, 1994
FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
TITLE: Resolution No. 89-97H: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL
SUMMARY: All cities are required to adopt conflict of interest codes designating certain positions
Participating in making decisions which may affect financial interests. Since adoption
of the City's Code on October 3, 1989, amendments have been necessary to add new
positions or delete obsolete positions.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 89-97H to add the
position of Community Relations Coordinator to the City's Conflict of Interest Code.
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X* Yes
No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority vote?
X Yes
No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
Yes
_
X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_
Yes
No
Which Commission?
_2L
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
X Yes
No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
_
*City Attorney prepared original Resolution --this effort changes the exhibits.
REVIEWED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD
Terrence L. Bel r Frank M. Usher Ly a Burgess
City Manager Assistant City Manager City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Conflict of Interest Code for City Personnel
ISSUE STATEMENT:
All state and local government agencies (including cities) are required to
adopt conflict of interest codes designating certain positions which entail
the making or participate in the making of decisions which may affect
financial interests.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 89-97H Amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code for
Designated City Personnel.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No financial impact.
BACKGROUND:
The City established its Conflict of Interest Code through adoption of
Resolution No. 89-97 on October 3, 1989. Six positions were designated at
that time to be required to file statements with the City Clerk disclosing
interests in real property and/or "income and investments from businesses
which provide or sell services or supplies of the type associated with the
job assignment and utilized by the City.,, Since that time, various
amendments have been adopted by the City Council for the purpose of
establishing further positions or adding Commissions also required to file
disclosure statements.
DISCUSSION:
Adoption of Resolution No. 89-97H would add the position of Community
Relations Coordinator authorized by City Council adoption of Resolution No.
90-45H on April 19, 1994.
PREPARED BY:
Lyn a Burgess, Ci Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 89-97 H
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Diamond Bar has heretofore enacted a
Conflict of Interest Code for designated personnel.
(ii) The Political Reform Act of 1974, California
Government Code Sections 81000, et seq. , requires the City to adopt
amendments to its Conflict of Interest Code to ensure employees of
the City are appropriately designated when new employees are added
to The City or changed circumstances occur with respect to job
functions.
(iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government
Code Section 87311, a duly noticed Public Hearing was conducted and
concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. In all respect as set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution.
2. The City's Conflict of Interest Code, as heretofore
adopted, hereby is amended by the adoption of a new Exhibit "A"
setting forth designated employees and disclosure categories
pertaining thereto.
3. Persons holding designated positions shall file
statements of economic interests pursuant to Sections 4 and 5 of
the Conflict of Interest Code.
4. . The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
1994.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 19th day of July
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted
and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar held on the 19th day of July , 1994, by
the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar
ATTACHMENT A
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et.
seq., requires state and local government agencies to adopt and
promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political
Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regs.
Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of
interest code. It can be incorporated by reference and may be
amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public
notice and hearings to conform to amendments in the Political
Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section
18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political
Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference and,
along with the attached Appendix in which members and employees are
designated and disclosure categories are set forth, constitute the
conflict of interest code of the City of Diamond Bar.
Designated employees shall file statements of economic
interests with the agency who will make the statements available
for public inspection and reproduction. (Gov. Code Section 81008).
Upon receipt of the statements of the City Council, Planning
Commission and City Manager, the agency shall make and retain a
copy and forward the original of these statements to the Fair
Political Practices Commission. Statements for all other
designated employees will be retained by the agency.
LB : JU'AQ,19 9 4
Ad
DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES APPENDIX A
Accounting Manager
Administrative Analyst
Administrative .Assistant
Assistant City Manager
Assistant to City Manager
Associate Engineer
Associate Planner
City Clerk
Community Relations Coordinator
Director of Community Development
Director of Community Services
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Parks & Recreation Commission
Senior Accountant
Senior Engineer
Superintendent of Parks & Maintenance
Traffic & Transportation Commission
Transportation Planner
Treasurer
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1
1
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
* NOTE: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney and Planning
Commissioners are required to submit disclosure statements pursuant
to State law (California Government Code Sections 87200, et. seq.),
not this Code.
LB: Jubb l9 9 4
ATTACHMENT B
CONSULTANTS, AD HOC COMMITTEES, TASK FORCES
AND SIMILAR GROUPS **
Commission Regulation 18700 defines "consultant" as an
individual who, pursuant to a contract with a state or local
government agency:
(A) Makes a governmental decision whether to:
(i)
Approve a rate, rule, or regulation;
Adopt or enforce a law;
Issue, deny, suspend, or revoke any permit,
license, application, certificate, approval,
order, or similar authorization or
entitlement;
(iv)
Authorize the agency to enter into, modify, or
renew a contract provided it is the type of
contract which requires agency approval;
(v)
Grant agency approval to a contract which
requires agency approval and in which the
agency is a party or to the specifications for
such a contract;
(vi)
Grant agency approval to a plan, design,
report, study, or similar item;
(vii)
Adopt, or grant agency approval of, policies,
standards, or guidelines for the agency, or
for any subdivision thereof; or
(B) Serves in a staff capacity with the agency and in that
capacity performs the same or substantially all the same
duties for the agency that would otherwise be performed
by an individual holding a position specified in the
agency's Conflict of Interest Code.
** With respect to consultants, ad hoc committees, task forces and
similar groups, the City Manager shall determine in writing if a
particular consultant, ad hoc committee, task force or similar
group performs a range of duties requiring disclosure hereunder.
That determination shall include a description of the consultant's,
ad hoc committee's, task force's or similar group's duties and a
statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. A copy of that
determination shall be filed with the City Clerk and a copy
forwarded to the City Council.
LB: JUkb l 9 9 4
APPENDIX B
Category 1
Persons in this category shall disclose all interests in real
property within the jurisdiction of the City. Real property shall
be deemed to be within the jurisdiction if it or any part of it is
located not more than two miles outside the City's boundaries or
within two miles of any land owned or used by the City.
Category 2
Persons in this category shall disclose all income from and
investments in the businesses which provide or sell services or
supplies of the type associated with the job assignment and
utilized by the City. In addition, as to any business entity in
which the person or his or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly or
beneficially, a ten percent or greater interest, the person shall
disclose his or her pro rata share of the income and the sources of
income of the entity if the entity provides or sells services or
supplies of the type indicated in the first sentence of this
paragraph.
LB : Ju'kb,19 9 4
CITY OF DIAMOND BAx r 7'
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager REPORT DATE: July 14, 1994
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
TITLE: Adoption of the 1994 General Plan
SUMMARY: In December, 1993, the City Council repealed the former General Plan and initiated actions
necessary to prepare the 1994 General Plan. A General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) was established
and 15 public meetings were held between January and June 1994, to craft the General Plan. On July 11,
1994, the Planning Commission began its public hearing process to review GPAC's recommendations.
Therefore, the City Council public hearing previously scheduled for July 19 should be continued.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the July 19th City Council Public Hearing be continued to
Monday, August 1, 1994. In addition, staff recommends the establishment of additional general plan public
hearings on August 2, and August 9, 1994.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
—Ordinances(s)
— Agreement(s)
-- Other
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: None
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
— Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A _ Yes —
No
by the City Attorney? MAJORITY
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? _ No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/Yes
— No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/AA _Yes
Which Commission? Yes X No
5. Are other departments affected by the report? —
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
;erre�nceL.
IEWED Y
Frank U er AeseStefan
Belanger Communis Deve opment Director
City Manager Assistant City Manager y
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of the 1994 General Plan
BACKGROUND: In December, 1993, the City Council repealed Resolution 93-58
which adopted the former General Plan. The Council initiated actions
necessary to prepare the 1994 General Plan. A General Plan Advisory
Committee (GPAC) was established and held 26 public meetings between January
11, 1994 and June 30, 1994 to craft the General Plan. On July 11, 1994 the
Planning Commission began its public hearing process to review GPAC's
recommendations. The Commission has established July 16, 1994 and July 25,
2995, as additional hearing dates. Therefore, the City Council public
hearing scheduled for July 19 should be continued.
The City Council has previously discussed placing the 1994 General Plan
before the voters on the November ballot. In order to do so the Council must
take affirmative action on the General Plan, and, call for placement on the
November ballot, by early August. Should the General Plan not be placed on
the November ballot, the City will have until October 31, 1994 to complete
the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the July 19th City Council Public
Hearing be continued to Monday, August 1, 1994. In addition, staff
recommends the establishment of additional general plan public hearings on
August 2, and August 9, 1994.
PREPARED BY:
James DeStefano
Community Development Director
4GE: 60.000 TRACT NO.47851 SHEET 1 OF 10 S
IF LOTS: 48
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 8 AND 9 AND A PORTION OF PARCELS 5, 6 AND 7 OF
PARCEL MAP NO. 1528, FILED IN BOOK 26, PAGES 19 TO 30 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS.
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR
R'S STATEMENT DATE OF SURVEY:
EBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE INTERESTED IN THE LANDS
ED WITHIN THE S(1401V/S14w' SAWrWV OV $WIS AW WI?WL.v THE DISTINCTIVE
LINES. AND WE CONSENT TO THE_PREPARATION AND FILING.
THER STATE THAT WE KNOW OF NO EASEMENT OR STRUCTURE EXISTING WITHIN THE
NTS HEREIN OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC. OTHER THAN PUBLICLY
WATER LINES. SEWERS OR STORM DRAINS. THAT WE WILL GRANT NO RIGHT OR
:ST WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID EASEMENTS OFFERED TO THE PUBLIC. EXCEPT
SUCH RIGHT OR INTEREST 1$ EXPRESSLY MADE SUBJECT TO THE SAID EASEMENTS.
:REBY ABANDON ALL RIGHTS -OF FURTHER SUBDIVISION IN ANY MANNER AND OF
:UCTION RIGHTS OF MORE THAN ONE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND ITS ACCESSORY
ON ANY LOT AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CI.TY OF
ID BAR THE RIGHT TO PROHIBIT THE ERECTION OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER
'ORES WITHIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS RESTRICTED USE AREAS. WE ALSO
ITE TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND'SAR THE EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND
SERVICES PURPOSES AND ALL USES INCIDENTAL THERETO INCLUDING THE RIGHT
kKE CONNECTIONS THEREWITH FROM ANY ADJOINING PROPERTIES! WE ALSO DEDICATE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR THE EASEMENTS FOR SEWER PURPOSES; WE ALSO DEDICATE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR THE EASEMENTS FOR GENERAL UTILITY. OPEN SPACE USE
?OUESTRIAN AND HIKING TRAIL PURPOSES "BPASE WOE PURFOSES� WEHEREBYIRREVOCABLY
FOR THE PUBLIC USE FOR STREET PURPOSES THE CERTAIN STRIPS OF LAND
4ATED AS PRIVATE AND FUTURE STREETS SHOWN ON SAID' MAP. RESERVING UNTO.
YES ALL ORDINARY USES OF SAID LAND EXCEPT THE ERECTION AND CONSTRUCTION
Y STRUCTURE NOT ORDINARILY PLACED IN PUBLIC STREETS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS
STREET IS ACCEPTED AND OPENED FOR PUBLIC USE. WE HEREBY IRREVOCABLY OFFER
THE PUBLIC USE FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES THE CERTAIN STRIPS OF LAND
MATED AS PRIVATE AND FUTURE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
VING UNTO OURSELVES ALL ORDINARY USES OF SAID LAND EXCEPT THE ERECTION
CONSTRUCTION OF ANY STRUCTURE NOT ORDINARILY PLACED IN STORM DRAIN
ENTS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS SAID STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 15 ACCEPTED BY THE
NINO BODY. ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. WE DO HEREBY. AND FOR OUR HEIRS,
TORS. ADMINISTRATORS. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AGREE
ALL PRIVATE AND FUTURE STREETS SHOWN ON SAID MAP WILL ACCEPT DRAINAGE
ADJOINING STREETS WHETHER IT BE A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET AND FURTHER
THAT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR IS HEREBY HELD FREE AND CLEAR OF ANY CLAIMS
MAGES ARISING FROM SAID DRAINAGE.
ND BAR EAST PARTNERS. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. AS OWNER.
ND RIDGE EAST MANAGEMENT CO.. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. AS GENERAL PARTNER.
3REGQ YdjDELGADO, PRESIDENT
KURT -NELSON. SECRETARY
F
LNEFIT OF OPERATING ENGINEERS FUNDS, INC., A CALIFORNIA
ORATION, AS CUSTODIAN FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS PENSION TRUST
ENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1993 AS
RUMENTNNNO, 93-2121100, O.R.
LEO %4. MA✓/C,!nIND M,4Nl4GER
J
THERESA GLYJDEL L, AOM/ . AS5/ST
L. S. 5669
AUGUST, 1992
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OF THE 5TA
CALIFORNIA: THAT THIS FINAL MAP CONSISTING OF 10 SHEETS IS A TR
COMPLETE SURVEY AS SHOWN AND WAS MADE BY ME .OR UNDER MY DIRECTI
AUGUST 1992. THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS
HEREON ARE IN PLACE OR WILL BE IN PLACE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR MONTF
THE FILING DATE OF THIS MAP: THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICI
ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED AND THAT TIE NOTES TO ALL CENT
MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON AS 'TO BE SET' WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFF
THE CITY ENGINEER WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS FROM THE FILING
HEREON.
ciEQ `AD S
RVS
�2 M • L�
J � �
L.S. 5669
' JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669 EXP_ 9/30/9F
REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 9-30-95
s�
9TH OF CALLfC
CITY ENGINEERS STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT Cl
SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTO
THEREOF: THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW AND SUBDIVISION ORD
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPLICABLE AT THE TIME APPROVAL
TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, SECTION 56450 (a) (1) (2) AND (3) HA'
COMPLIED WITH.
GEORGE A;WAwr2 R.C.E. 43273 DATE:
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REVIEWED FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY:
.THEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLI
ALL PROVISIONS OF THE STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPF
THE TENTATIVE MAP, AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS
TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY 1
ENGINEER.
MICHAEL D. MYERS R.C.E. 30702 DATE:
OF:
CHARLES ABBOTT 6 ASSOCIATES
371 VAN NESS WAY, #200; TORRANCE, CA
CITY COUNCIL STATEMENT
AGE: 60.000 TRACT NO, 47851
SHEET 2 OF 10 ;
OF LOTS: 48
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
OF CALIFORNIA) SS.
OF SAN DIEGO)
1fle= i(�
RSi
PUBLIC, PEONALLY APPEARED.ESL
(ALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO MON S1,IE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY
ICE) TO BE I INSTRUMENTHEE TO THE
ANDACKKNOWLWHOSE AMS
ACKNOWLEDGED /SUBSCRIBED
HATHE/SHE/THEYEXECUTED
ME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES). AND THAT BY HIS/
IEIR SIGNATURE (S) ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON (S) OR THE ENTITY
IEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
;S MY HAND:
PRINT NAME:
!MISSION EXPIRES: _A zz-9
PAL PLACE OF BUSINESS: LAS flr1OpIP5 COUNTY.
rrancawM#
Ian �g8 �
C�mn COYNN -
IM/
OF CALIFORNIA) SS.
OF SAN•-9;EGO Los Aw4s"u
l9gQ BEFORE ME. 6iexvieve nl. %_4.n�o
PUBLIC. -PERSONALLY APPEARED 1,0-^A. /�a,:iL �-1 73+eir �adei�
ALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY
CE) TO BE THE PERSON (S) WHOSE NAME (S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TD THE
HEIN
INSTRUMENT
HIS/HER/THEIRNAUTHORIZED CAPACITY UES), AND OWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/ TTHAT HEY EBYCHIS/
EIR SIGNATURES) ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS) OR THE ENTITY
--HALF OF WHICH THE PERSON (S) ACTED EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
S, MY HAND:
PRINT NAME: EnlEyiEy� n(. %Aal a
MISSION EXPIRES:
SAL PLACE OF BUSINESS: Ina _ .males COUNTY.
)F CALIFORNIA) SS.
--F SAN DIEGO)
19_ BEFORE ME,
PUBLIC. PE. Y APPEARED
kLLY KNOWN TO ME LIVED TO ME -UNI IS OF SATISFACTORY
:E) TO BE THE PERSON( SE NA S/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDG ME THAT HE/SHE/ THEY EXECUTED
IE IN HIS/HER/THEIR IZED C TY(IES). AND THAT BY HIS/
:IR SIGNATURE HE INSTRUMENT. TH SON(S) OR THE ENTITY
:HALF OF THE PERSON(S) ACTED EXECUTED NSTRUMENT.
MY HAND:
PRINT NAME:
IISSION EXPIRES:
'AL PLACE OF BUSINESS: COUNTY
F CALIFORNIA) SS.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 55436 Ca) 3 (A] I1 -viii] OF THE SUBDIVISION I
THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN OMITTED. THEIR IN1
BEING SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGN)
ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.
1. THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.. A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATIOD
TRUSTEE HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS. INGRE
AND EGRESS. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND OTHER PURPOSES BY DEED RECC
JUNE 30, 1971 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. 3055 AND 3094. OF OFFICIAL
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 (a) 3 (C) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP
THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN OMITTED. THEIR INT
BEING SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNA
ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.
1. DIAMOND BAR DEVELOPMENT CORPDRATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA
HOLDER OF OIL, GAS OR MINERAL RIGHTS BY DEED (LEASE) RECORDE
BOOK D774 PAGE 312. AND IN BOOK D774 PAGE 315. BOTH OF 0_R.
2. TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, HOLDER OF OIL. GAS OR MI
RIGHTS BY DEED (LEASE) RECORDED MARCH 29, 1968 IN BOOK 03955
185, AND RECORDED JUNE 24, 1970 IN BOOK D4750, PAGE 11. BO
O.R.
PURSUANT_ TO CHAPTER 6. ARTICLE 1. SECTION 66499.20 1/2 OF
SUBDIVISION MAP AOT. THE FILING OF THIS MAP CONSTITUTES ABANDONME
THE EASEMENT FOR UTILITY. OPEN SPACE USE AND EQUESTRIAN AND H
IRAIL.PURPOSES. THE EASEMENTS FOR SLOPE PURPOSES AND THE OFFER'
DEDICATION. OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES.
SHOWN ON THIS MAP THAT ARE IlEtmS
.101 10,rF "r ; :;"rib
^
9 V "6^ 'AS^IN^THAT DOCUMENT RED
OCTOBER ��12,1988ASINSTRUMENT NO. 88-1542210 OF OFFICIAL RECORD:
AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 1528. FILED IN BOOK 25. PAGES 19 TO
PARCEL MAPS AND IN THAT DOCUMENT NO. 3544 JUNE 19. 1970 IN BOOK D -
PAGE 878, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND DOCUMENT NO. 3545 RECORDED JUNE
]970 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
1GE: 60.000 TRACT NO. 47851
SHEET 3 OF 10 S
lF LOTS: 48
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER 6 ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP TRACT NO. $0670
i OF BEARINGS: �•�• 77���9—`��
e
APING OF N 45'28'19'E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY
RY OF PARCEL NAP NO. 1528 WAS USED AS THE
OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP �y�y5g 1 WAGON TRAIN ZANE I
'MENTATION NOTES. D. CONC. NAIL DEDICATED PER
�1 • 13' 29•
o q$ TRACT NO. 30578
n0�`1; hp
I \ �1 7� l 60 I �t I • I
NDICATES LOCATION OF 2' IRON PIPE TAGGED �, L=16.03' 1
L.S. 5669• TO BE SET. R
v `a6 n F�
D. NOTHING.
INDICATES LOCATION OF SPIKE AND WASHER TAGGED ��
INDICATES
5669' TO BE SET.tea•
` ke �` \\ , \ \ , N . 27'07. 1217. 0
. 0 \ ` N 52. 27 07' E 217. C
A 2' IRON PIPE WILL BE SET AT ALL REAR LOT CORNERS 74 �, 52.27.36'E 217.0
EXCEPTING LOTS 1 THROUGH 19 AND 42 THROUGH 48 WHERE / \\� o•
A 2' IRON PIPE WILL BE SET SO FEET FROM THE FRONT 'FUTURE STREET'
LOT CORNER ALONG THE SIDE LOT LINE. / DEDICA7A TRACT NO 30578 \\ g23 A
A SPIKE AND WASHER WITH TAG •L.S. 5669' WILL BE SET ,� f
IN PAVEMENT AT THE TRUE LOCATION OF ALL FRONT LOT 72SLY BOUNDARY •
CORNERS7.22 yZ ;� OAK KNOLL DRIVE
OF ACT05
VD. M.B.�785/132578 1 iN �,,• �` (PRIVATE STREET)
ri
INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING
FD. NOTHING. 48
SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. \ off~ i 2
REMAIDERINDICATESPARCEL THE BOUNDARY OF THE ►0 3yhym`0o 46 47 11
INDICATES RECORD DATA PER P.M. 1528I r3 SHEE 9 // SHEET 4 3
INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 30578 45
MENT NOTES: l =� �k 4
EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES TO BE FD. 2' I.P. W/TAG MKD. 'RCE 9783' • i X` k
PER TRACT NO. 30578 MB 785/1-25 44
RESERVED IN DDCUMENjS / �\ 5
2WSEMENT FOR SLOPE AND DRAINAGE N 08' 53' 00•E / 3f
1 11
leINTENANCE PURPOSES TO BE RESERVED 188.73 � 32
iN DOCUMENTS 4.3
RESTRICTED USE AREA 1 1 3 3 O r t 6
1 I 1
EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEVER PURPOSES N 43.26' 00• W 42 1 r BENTLEY IiAY 7
11 s. s3 N 6382. 560•E 2 29 I I (PRIVATE STREET)
EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE USE PURPOSES
In SB %ASEAY6D IH OO wmr vq5
CENTERLINE OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY. N 69_22'07' FRAD.
OPEN SPACE USE, AND EQUESTRIAN AND34
HIKING TRAIL PURPOSES 1 R-1000''LL-99.56• r SHEET 8 28 I I 8
PRIVATE AND FUTURE EASEMENT FDR N 1 4.57' 00• W 79.13 1 I
STREET PuPPOBE S/tVOE.4t5EMEA/TFQQ f 35 + \
,�ecic uriulY�ia�1SEs 1 9
PRIVATE AND FUTURE EASEMENT FOR 2 27 1
STORM DRAIN PURPOSES I
�z3.27• oo• I 36 1 1 �1
R-700 L=286. 50' I Fr --` 26 7 1 f V ^
BOUNDARY OF PCL. B OF LOT i i 10ao
UNE ADJUSTMENT REC. 10/20/93
AS FILE NO. 93-2044263 2 3 T } �.e �� SHEET 5
of 1 37veo
{ 11 }3
1 � �
ZN i 38 25 �1 12 00
1 1 NN
} I 1 13 zz
n�32• 42' 00• 1 24 I
R�350' Ls199.75' 39)IOODBRIDGE CO UR
LAut: 60.000 SHEET 4 OF 10
OF LOTS: 48 TRACT NO . 47851
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER 6 ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
4Pv
/V
A FD. NOTHING
60 120 180 240 N 52.27' 36' E 217. os'
GRAPHIC SCALE loo
\ S�E
vs,
� 07• E4,L3114 1'14 4� ,
N .50A ► I n
\ \ ► n
\ ►z NATURAL OrPA/Nrl�
\ \ z ►► CDU�P`✓EPERPM
1.39 \ � \Z �:N\ ► ��= 1�
` \ o
>>/ 6d,5'a\\ / \;\a �wo��\ i �f 123,331 S.F.
SSE%������� \mo�o\+'� la ► 3 ►
25/ \ 1• \st \p r o 1 0
1551.77'
\ \ $ O1Ir Im• N 49.30'00'E ,
1 n 454.84'
1473.75 5
1 01 0.00 � N 73.32' 00' W �
38. 98' 1 N 3
Cl)
I Oo m NIS S oo. \ 1 3 �iw 2 N _n
�.a
2O. I Z7 h NIS $ ► 1.0
u't1* 100,075 S.F.in
I z
,Q"'.n IYI I"'n 3 If
°p `r Ian
��Z'n�N I N�!,o I z I
lao owl
N7649' S9' E RAD.ro, zl + ► N 56-38'00"E 1555.73'
��(/ — / v a / a z ► I I 418. 61'
244.00'
)\ /
� 4 ., 40, . 77•
4 /,Q\ 31.78v
N 46.41 00' W \ z I
51.92' r\iA
N 73_06 20')! RAD. (v bn 'k�y 3I wl oo• N► 3
cq
\ 71 Q„ • �v al of 4' ► 1 W\N r
J c N 42.27' 00'W \�• 81,181 S.F.
ry 1 1 N 35.50' 00' W f
53.27' 1 1 85.39' \ �
/ y z z I N 89.02' 00' E \ N 57.37' 00' E 643. 42'
4 () i I /p j N 52.53 0p
X / i� I i 37. 31' \\I 23. 29' 1 206.53'
43. 53' / ��-- ► 381. 03'
A�7.54' 24' N 52' 53' 00' W \I 1 \ z
z 00 h L-46.92' 19.46' I z ,co
�� 91wy1 4h / 19.14'00'E 8.51' z 1 1-� o\: 4 I n /J
X '1900'00'00' ate' low �1a
R�13' L-20. 42' °::1 la o 81,07$ S.F.
'AGE: 60.000 SHEET 5 OF 10
OF LOTS: 48 TRACT NO, 47851
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
"v
60 120 180 240 E� NO 4
GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHE \ �•
t \ \ U
1 6 0. 1 \ \ \ H 55' 24 00• E 1831 90' i
1 30� ► m \ \ � \ 356.08 .q1
390.41 ORA.
30 1
1 1 1 \Z 7 m
1 p \ 1 N 28.11 ' 00' W
0. 11 N 45.5100-W t 63.27 N�\� 64,585 S.F. '
j Z 28.36
,� l wI \ P
1 + it
1➢ �' "1 `' �;\ \\ 664747' 00' W 496.12 \ 145. p0
1
I fT1 $ r $lu oo \\\
N55- 24 00'E 326.61
-)
9 ► ► 3/ j
1 fmrlN 86.17' 00' W 14.72 8 a
1 ✓
().00 N 38' 33' 00' W 15. 97 ^* / 60,702 S.F. u
►1 N 17.37' 27'W N/m
- ! I
67.82
0]
►1 w 0►� k / /+�•h� / 475.11 160.00'
Z 1 m 00
11 1�o0'L/' = N 55.24 00 1 361. 57
O I �' / ,b. / \ 38-2.62 1
7 28 1 r\/ \
' y- (1t \� N 73.46'00'W 1
22.84 \ q
(n N 1{ s\ 1 N 32.43' 00' W \ Z v m
LLLJ
U ► W\ �\� 73,714 S.F.
1 ��
(f)1 �`�oloo, 00 9 \\ N 53.10.00'W �+\0
72.65 \�
z
t Q� tY� N 29'40'00'W \\ u
_!j_ 70.11' 7 E RA).1 13� a� ,a ow\\ 1 23.56 N 64'41WE 298.41 \i59.99
120.00' u
1 271.13' o
\312.67 1 f
,b / N 18.45' 00-W / 0
1N, N 14.18'00'W �_1 68.60 ;/
I f%,mo.o ev�"'1 0 0°0� e°� 28.79 1 eovl 64,545 S.F.
rP 5 n
ev
N CD
26 N 05.38' 0p' E 21 u
/ � 1
/ 32.16' ' ' // N 68.32'00'E
N 89.25_28' W RAD_ / / O / /q \ 1493-94
317.72 145.001
/ .j� {/,/ham 1 N950* 22'00•W 346.48 �I
t/ ,gyp j0y Oo• Z j J 1. 91 nt
^ / `a" 7 /\ / N 10' 15' 00' W "lm
49.03
38.57 otn
l� � ,,�,\�, \ �t� 62,789 S.F.
E: 60.000
LOTS: 48 TRACT N0.
47851 SHEET 6 OF 10 SHE
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO. INC.
JOHN W. HILL. JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
SEARING
6'00'N
17'00'
'04'32'
'32'16'
11'00'W
08'00'E
OS'24'W
56'12'E
41'21'W
56'30'E
.40'40'W
'54'10'E
°57.55-E
9°51'16'
°53'21'W
Ir 42' 00_
8°30'21'
3°19.00-E
5° 0
9°fi'00'W
4°43'00_E
5'09'00'E
s° 10'00'E
V 43' WE
9° 30'54
55° 43' WE
28•r2, 0 W
09`ST '00�E
85,06' 30'
6°51'32'
3° 20' 19'
RADIUS
LEN./DIST.
76.05
320.00
90.94
44.00
163.63
68.00
25.40
49.14
23.63
55.59
49.57
43.31
6.49
36.48
26.32
37.86
35.00
30.45
18.44
150.00
98.70
150.00
22.27
41.25
12.98
35.12
30.06
30.0
36.5
30.0
88.00
14.6
14.8
1.3
71.0
250.00
35.
250.00..
29.
350.00
2D•
O
Z
F-
W
W
w
W
N
I
\ P�
i6.27
5f.2f \ o,o t
11.15 rr
�
1 J p
1 +.
1
241
2 1}
0 IQ
1 7.32 1 3
6 1
1
3
i
0 3 <
38 17.72 1 g• c
93 14.98 i Yoe 0 3
39 10.20
0
1 z �
I $
I rc^ ;oc
Y �G
I OO Oi N �
231
I �J
N 61 -07'19'L -RAD-,} Z
1 u�
1 N �
22 1 u�
1 O
1 f�
N 64_38' 32' E RAD_
I
1W _
SEE SHEET N0. 5
1
J
Dk
OVA
SHEET 7 OF 10
.AGE: 60.000
OF LOTS: 48 TRACT N0 47551
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO. INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
SEE SHEET No. . 8
1
36
al 2 6
cm z
WOODS
..
1. &-4.06' 3Y
L-25. 11'
N 55_42LV' L RADL
N 78_05' 21'E RAD. -
0� I
o_ � I
^n~I
�61.07'19'E RAD_
�_�L .d0- 39'
u 1
1
,�ll
�•�Ak ♦ Cn
0.
12
%P A
E RADS\
RAL)_
13
c1 m 1
24
r
21,953 S.F.
E ul I
14
1 I 6
o;,,. I N 73.34' 12'E RAL
N 65' 09' OO'E\ 130,bpo• 29' 48'
125.82'
L-3.03'
0� I
o_ � I
^n~I
�61.07'19'E RAD_
�_�L .d0- 39'
u 1
1
3E: 60.000 SHEET 8 OF 10 SF
= LOTS: 48 TRACT NO 47851
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO. INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
46
a` S
/ 1 �
°.
60 120 180 240 .`ry; y,°. -0'`� '� \
GRAPHIC SCALE 45 `'O.O°• \ /
a° \
lb -
31
5
A 30.936 S.F. ,0.00
�.��a` �+:►w�=, \\t
4 �/ , n v /^o do \qr C's ��'' Ns1 7' 07• f" \ `f? t E RtO�
v r• N
00.!1 1, 15 ° 114
32' 1 \15 15 �I X11
/ �r r/v 30,959 S.F.
N 14' 34' 00• E 7' 1
/ ) A, a3� .1 % 15.12' rn 1
/ p ?,)• 1 1 N I
30 ml u �1
43 ! Q a l hm ` 8t• Ook 26,074 S.F.
1 qn n
4' ��i9• ?x f .� J
f\ 1 177.73 1 1
eon C 55.24 07 30. p0 =
3 3 ,
1 35,751 S.F. sJ /' �8 /� N 147.73 v �1
a 1'1'1► 7
t o N 25'38'600'W N 12.48' 00' W , o Z l
1 0. I 89
I 58.34' �'
42
1 N 23'1r 00'W 1 2 a r
1 ri 1 55.15 1 29 U11 u P 1 f
Nn x-0'41'17' r v
x-0.37' 3r = L-12.37' 1 11.17 r 25,371 S.F. 1 m 1 �-
4-10.94' - --- rn 1
N 67.20 3-7'E RADLI 0 02 - N 32.28' 00' W 1
24
�i n o ^b/ 74.94 w 75. 53' 00• E 202. 21. 1 00 y 1
T"t-�L' Ne SIN �~/ $Q" . p N 55.172.21. 1 "�1 m
N 62 48 00 E 382. 56 J g w i j A3 ? 00.
0 -� , 1 R1
N 69.22' 07'� RADS p osl� W •f N 4.26' 00'W , l V lJ rn
L-09. 16'~o N N 11N 34 ,Z : 17.42' o X11 1, 1 4 Lo
=
R-too0' T�o �3n1^ 32,913 S.F. 1wa 2 �'; 20 0 0 1 X71
A-5- 40' S3' zT� . oln ?1 01� 0 of 1 ill
p 25,651 S.F. ► f --I
21 N )5.45.00-C o p p.
N 74' 18' S8' E RADS 0 01 l 263. 88' 11 f 279, 4. 1 1 Z
- — v 0• �. 02, g o o.O. 4j ' 31 ' 1 20 26 0 8 4 055 24 192. 69 1 17. 86' O
L•42.81' W • ! L`12.44' N 00'E O i
^^ W o1n 247. 63' 76. BO 5 N 162.69' 17. 86' 1
UI
:rn (n alai N
2a-35'15. 32' �1 i
2 ^In 35 30.11 �'E 31.57' �I 9N
l 14.3 N 6' 32' 00'W of e 1
29.295 S.F. 55. 76 e oo'w 53.67'
27
4GE: 60.000 SHEET 9 OF 10 S
JF LOTS: 48 TRACT NO. 4785 1
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992
60 120 180 240
GRAPHIC SCALE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 10
kik
sy
w�
3
1 4 77
J 1 /
2r /
Y !
S'
❑ATA
DELTA/BEARING
RADIUS LEN_/DISI
N 16°24'00.1
35.26
2
N 09°05'30'W
23.94
3
N 03°25'30'W
39.82
4
N 04°23'39'W
38.84
5
N 03*15 WE
50.53
6
N 03°16'14'E
21.84
7
rN 16°00'48'W
48.89
6
N 70°46'00'W
20.86
3E: 60.000 SHEET 10 OF 10 SH
= LOTS: 48 TRACT NO, 47851
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HUNSAKER 6 ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC.
JOHN W. HILL, JR. L.S. 5669 ' ?�2
DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 1992 o
r
u
to 0 0 rro° s '�
O 0 °o dl *FUTURE
3 °' e n ro '' DEDICAT
TRACT f
o ; 3 3 3 W 3 MB 789,
0
N O O p O1
0 0 ~ 8. 51 3/. 38 7 N 21_03' 26•E I
N r Na o o n
_ co ° 0
1 0 NO 20 + n o� :N N 19.25'35_E RAD.
z� z z zm zo
3 ; 1 W 9.77'
S
! o g ' o e o ,, 6 1 ,
4-0 I IID!
w w N n�1N 2
�! Y �_ N eV
��ro 1 2 O� 11 to
^00 n 6 1
N m O Nl
zr / 1Z* z0 Zo 4 ID e-90.03' 30' L- 487. 26'
ol
Q A-89'48' 25' L- 485.90'
]O bwoO' 15' 05' L- 1. 36'
/ A,-90- 03' 30' L- 440.11'
k ! mn N 67 7' 08'E / / 1 // �S p-90.03' 30' L- 534. 41'
/ ® S� / m o
1 t / a ea88.10' 32' L- 523. 24'
29.97- r
}
_ 194. 74 4 / 9 ,��0 0 / Qi er01' 52' 58' L- 11. 17'
l ^F 1 9 22.49 36'1y I/ / ? ~ / 0 1 �Z
38'W 1 DE_
r ' I 239,? 40' 94 m
N 22'49' 7 / 2 NO SCALE
• ! Y o
o
26`79' I q
8 , o
'^zl U 1 Nh o '� N 22.05' 00' W
zI , n^ ! •521_W 108.53
o,
/ 6i /
44.WN
Y 1
r
h
7co
N \ \
5°53'00°14
41.34
7°16'36'E
o I
n
55.95
0�
16.88
Z
66.45
Z
N j O
29.90
B Z Z Z
' N 7 41
1
477.183 S.F.
x
2g J6.W
pATA
N 22.49' 324 2'W 547N . 4T r _
A/BEARING
RAOIUS LEN./DIST. TANGENT
!°02'00'E
3.71
5°53'00°14
41.34
7°16'36'E
94.94 _
6°24'00'W
55.95
7°57'00•E
16.88
6141'00'E
66.45
3°52'00'E
29.90
3°14.00-W
68-83
mo
N
p 1 1
O° 6 0 /
n N 45' 12'00'E
z o~/ 120.49 -
1ie°'
EXISTING OFFER TO DEOICAI
ESMT. FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND
PURPOSES TO THE COUNTY OF
PER INST. NO. 3545, REC. f
IN BOOK M3513, PAGE 816
IS NOT ABANDONED.
�L17G'. RCC. ✓!/4/E /J, /9�� •4S 't!/
A&I - S44 IAIA50a< 1042WO P�
FD. 1' I.P. W/TAG MKD.
I r•tarc 0757' PFR P.M. 1528
FINAL TRACT MAPS UNAVAILABLE
WILL BE DELIVERED ON MONDAY,
JULY 18, 1994
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994 REPORT DATE: July 15, 1994
FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer
TITLE: Approval of Tract Map No. 47851 located easterly of Wagon Train Lane -Oak Knoll Drive, et al. in
"The Country".
SUMMARY: This project provides for the subdivision of 60 acres into a 48 lot single family residential
development. Lots will range in size from .5 gross acres over 10 gross acres. This map has been submitted
to the City of Diamond Bar for a final tract map approval.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council by minute action: (1) find that the attached
final map of Tract No. 47851 is in substantial compliance with the conditionally approved vesting tentative map
and approve said map; abandoning certain prior offers of dedication and easements not shown, rejecting certain
offers and accepting on behalf of the public easements and rights offered all as provided thereon; (2) authorize
the Mayor to execute the Subdivision Agreement, Tri -party Agreement (Subdivision, Walnut Valley Water
District and City), and bonds on behalf of the City; (3) authorize the City Engineer to sign the map; and (4)
direct the City Clerk to sign as provided thereon and process the map for recordation by the County Recorder.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
Resolution(s) Bid Specifications
Ordinances(s) X Other: Tract Map; Subdivision Bonds &
Agreement
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes No
by the City Attorney?
— Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: Planning Department, Fire Department
REVIEWED BY:
Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager
Atlx -u—�
Frank M. Usher �.,�George A. Wen
Assistant City Manager Interim City Engineer
C: \ W P60\LINDAKAY W GFND-9\T47851 TM.719
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Final Map - Tract No. 47851
ISSUE STATEMENT:
This matter requests the approval of final map of Tract No. 47851 located easterly of Wagon Train Lane, Oak
Knoll Drive et al. in "The Country". This project is a 48 lot single family residential development on a 60
acre site.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council by minute action: (1) find that the attached final map of Tract No.
47851 is in substantial compliance with the conditionally approved vesting tentative map and approve said map;
abandoning certain prior offers of dedication and easements not shown, rejecting certain offers and accepting
others all as provided thereon; (2) authorize the Mayor to execute the Subdivision Agreement, Tri -party
Agreement (Subdivider, Walnut Valley Water District and City) and bonds on behalf of the City; (3) authorize
the City Engineer to sign the map; and (4) direct the City Clerk to certify and process the map for recordation.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
Approval of the map will not have any impact on the City's 1994-95 Budget.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 47851 was conditionally approved on June 2, 1992 by City Council
Resolution 92-33. This project provides for 48 single family residential lots on a 60 acre site. Lots range in
size from 0.5 acres to over 10 acres.
DISCUSSION:
The final map has been reviewed by the City Engineer and is technically correct and conforms substantially
to the approved tentative map. All conditions of the tentative map approval required to be performed prior to
approval of the final map have been satisfied.
According to the utility companies and other agencies which are affected by this project, all applicable
conditions for approval of this project have been met.
Final Map - Tract No. 47851
July 19, 1994
Page Two
All of Lots 18 and 19 are noted on the map as a restricted use area and the right to prohibit the erection of
buildings and structures is dedicated. Areas designated on the map as easements for open space purposes are
to be reserved in other documents as private open space. Portions of the Skyline Trails Extension (Schabarum)
bridal and hiking trail are abandoned in favor of the offer to dedicate a trail for like purposes along a more
serviceable alignment through the project.
The included subdivision agreement provides for the construction of all public improvements within 1 year and
performance of such is secured by surety bonds. The Tri -party Agreement, between the Subdivider, Walnut
Valley Water District and the City gives the City the authority to direct, should it be necessary; Walnut Valley
Water District is to install water system improvements. A $41,750 negotiable bond, to secure the setting of
subdivision monuments, is also being provided to the City.
Prepared By:
George A. Wentz
Interim City Engineer
C:1, W P60\L W DAKAY\CCR-941T47851 TM.719
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Vesting Tentative Tract No.47851/Final Tract No.47851
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this day
of , 1994, by and between DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (hereinafter referred to as
"Subdivider") and the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City").
A. Recitals.
(i) There has been previously approved a Vesting
Tentative Tract Map for Tract No. 47851 in the City of
Diamond Bar.
(ii) Subdivider seeks approval of a Final Map
covering all of the area of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 47851
and bearing the reference Tract No. 47851.
B. Agreement.
follows: It is agreed by and between the parties hereto as
1. In consideration of City's approval of Tentative
Subdivision Tract Map No.47851 and filing of Final Tract No.
47851, Subdivider undertakes and agrees that it will, at
Subdivider's sole cost and expense, make all the improvements
upon and in connection with said Tract in accordance with
plans and specifications therefor on file with City, as
follows: (a.)Grading Plans for Tract No. 47851 (7 sheets)
prepared by Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. under
supervision of Gregory E. Gallagher, R.C.E. 42128, dated
7/1/93 and approved 11/12/93; (b.)Storm Drain Improvement
Plans for Tract 47851 (5 sheets) prepared by Hunsaker and
Associates San Diego Inc. under supervision of David A.
Hammar, R.C.E. 34757, dated 3/8/94 and approved 4/26/94;
(c. )Street Improvement Plans for Tract 47851 (7 sheets)
prepared by Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. under
supervision of David A. Hammar, R.C.E. 34757, dated 3/8/94
and approved 4/19/94; (d.)Sanitary Sewer Plans P.C. No.
DB -93-002 for Tract 47851 (4 sheets/8 pages) prepared by
Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. under supervision of
David A. Hammar, R.C.E. 34757, undated and approved 5/24/94;
(e. )Sewer Lift Station Plans for Tract 47851 (4 sheets)
prepared by David Evans and Associates Inc. under supervision
of Cornelius J. Gantney, R.C.E. 34674, dated 3/31/93, as may
be revised and approved by the City Engineer; (f.)Domestic
Water Distribution System improvement plans prepared by
Walnut Valley Water District under supervision of W.E.
Ingalsbe, R.C.E. 10244, dated 4/7/94, and approved 4/8/94;
(g.)Planting and Irrigation Plan prepared by Craig Weber &
Associates, undated and approved 10/1/93 all incorporated
herein and made a part hereof; and in accordance with
Final Map - Tract No. 47851
July 19, 1994
Page Two
All of Lots 18 and 19 are noted on the map as a restricted use area and the right to prohibit the erection of
buildings and structures is dedicated. Areas designated on the map as easements for open space purposes are
to be reserved in other documents as private open space. Portions of the Skyline Trails Extension (Schabarum)
bridal and hiking trail are abandoned in favor of the offer to dedicate a trail for like purposes along a more
serviceable alignment through the project.
The included subdivision agreement provides for the construction of all public improvements within 1 year and
performance of such is secured by surety bonds. The Tri -party Agreement, between the Subdivider, Walnut
Valley Water District and the City gives the City the authority to direct, should it be necessary; Walnut Valley
Water District is to install water system improvements. A $41,750 negotiable bond, to secure the setting of
subdivision monuments, is also being provided to the City.
Prepared By:
George A. Wentz
Interim City Engineer
C: \ W P60\LMAKAY\CCR-94\T47851TM.719
(h.)Reclaimed Water Distribution System improvement plans to
be prepared and approved by the City Engineer and the Walnut
Valley Water District; and including all matters required by
the Planning Commission and City Council of City in
connection with the various steps leading to approval of said
Tentative Tract No. 47851.
Subdivider agrees that all boundary monuments shown on
the final map to be set will be set and survey notes thereof
submitted to the City Engineer.
Subdivider also undertakes and agrees upon the same
consideration to comply with all ordinances and regulations
of City, and to do all other and further acts required of it
pursuant to this Agreement.
Subdivider agrees in connection therewith to pay or
cause to be paid all amounts becoming due to contractors,
subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing
labor or materials to the foregoing Final Map with respect to
such improvements, or to Subdivider with respect thereto.
Subdivider agrees that all such improvements shall be
constructed and completed in accordance with City standards
as determined by the City Engineer and in accordance with any
applicable conditions as hereinabove referred to, and in
accordance with the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
In case of any dispute, the good faith judgment of the
City Engineer shall be final and binding upon the parties.
2. Subdivider undertakes and agrees that all the work
of improvement and setting of boundary monuments and
furnis:i_.:g of survey notes shall be completed within 365 days
from the date of this Agreement.
3. Should Subdivider fail to comply with any of the
terms or provisions of this Agreement, Subdivider shall be
liable to City for the reasonable value of any work or
improvements not completed or improperly done or performed.
In the event of any such failure, City shall give to
Subdivider written notice thereof.
Unless the work or improvements covered by said notice,
including defective work and improvements, are commenced by
Subdivider within fifteen (15) days of the date of said
notice and diligently prosecuted to completion, City may at
its option:
(a) Collect from Subdivider the reasonable value of the
work and improvements not so done and performed by
2
Subdivider, to be measured by the anticipated costs and
expenses of completing the same; or
(b) City may complete said work and improvements not so
completed by Subdivider and collect its costs and expenses in
completing the same; or
(c) City may as to some of such work and improvements
proceed under remedy (a) above, and as to the remainder under
remedy (b) above.
City may change it's election of any option prior to the
trial of any lawsuit, and prior thereto, no election of
remedies shall be binding upon City. In either event, there
shall be included in said "costs and expenses", the
reasonable overhead expenses of the City. In addition to the
foregoing, Subdivider shall be liable to City for reasonable
attorneys' fees and court costs incurred by City in enforcing
the obligations of Subdivider under this Agreement.
4. Subdivider shall provide bonds, or similar
instruments, from an approved corporate surety, satisfactory
to City in the following amounts and for the following
purposes:
A.)
a.) A surety bond in the amount of $913,743.00
as security guaranteeing construction of all grading
improvements as required under section B.l.a,
hereinabove described, and full performance of all the
terms of this Agreement;
b.) A surety bond in the amount of $456,872.00
as security guaranteeing payment to the contractor, his
subcontractor (s) and to persons renting equipment or
furnishing labor or materials to them with respect to
said improvements;
B.)
a.) A surety bond in the amount of $11833,000.00
as security guaranteeing construction of all storm
drain, street, sanitary sewer and sanitary sewer lift
station improvements as required under section B.l.b
through B.l.e inclusive, hereinabove described, and full
performance of all the terms of this Agreement;
b). A surety bond in the amount of $916,500.00
as security guaranteeing payment to the contractor, his
subcontractors) and to persons renting equipment or
furnishing labor or materials to them with respect to
said improvements;
C . ) 8 Soo, ao
a.) A surety bond in the amount of $
as security guaranteeing payment for construction of all
3
domestic water system improvements as required under
section B.l.f, hereinabove described, and full
performance of all the terms of this Agreement;193,15o...
b.) A surety bond in the amount of $
as security guaranteeing payment to the contractor, his
subcontractors) and to persons renting equipment or
furnishing labor or materials to them with respect to
said improvements;
D.)
a.) A surety bond in the amount of $328,000.00
as security guaranteeing construction of all planting
and irrigation improvements as required under section
B.l.g, hereinabove described, and full performance of
all the terms of this Agreement;
b.) A surety bond in the amount of $164,000.00
as security guaranteeing payment to the contractor,
his subcontractor(s) and to persons renting equipment
or furnishing labor or materials to them with respect
to said improvements;
E . )m
2 � mo. co
a.) A surety bond in the amount of $
as security guaranteeing design, preparation of plans
and construction of all reclaimed water system
improvements as required under section B.l.h,
hereinabove described, and full performance of all the
terms of this Agreement; *109 m
b.) A surety bond in the amount of $
as security guaranteeing payment to the contractor, his
subcontractors) and to persons renting equipment or
furnishing labor or materials to them with respect to
said improvements;
F.)
a.) A negotiable bond in the amount of $41,750.00
as security guaranteeing payment of the cost of setting
survey monuments not set at the time of recording of the
final map.
5. Acceptance of any work or improvements by City
shall not constitute an acknowledgment by City that the same
are properly done or performed, except as to any items or
matters readily apparent from an inspection thereof. Except
as to such matters so readily apparent, Subdivider shall
repair any defects which occur in the work of improvements
within one (1) year following acceptance by City.
As a condition precedent to the acceptance of the
improvements hereunder as being complete, and prior to the
4
release of any bonds required under paragraph 4, hereof,
securing the faithful performance of Subdivider's obligations
hereunder, Subdivider shall give a bond, or similar
instrument, from an approved corporate surety satisfactory to
City in the amount of $787,500.00 as a guarantee and
warranty of the work, for a one(1) year period following the
completion and acceptance thereof against any defective work
or labor done, or defective materials furnished.
6. All notices to Subdivider may be sent to:
3480 Torrance Blvd.. Ste. 300
Address
Torrance, CA 90503
State --_ Zip
or at such other address of which City shall actually receive
notice in writing specifically calling attention to this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed, this
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS, A California Limited Partnership
BY President
GregoA Del O TITLE
BY Secretary
Kurt Nelson TITLE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a municipal corporation
By
Mayor
Approved as to Form: -
City Attorney
5
Attest By
City Clerk
release of any bonds required under paragraph 4, hereof,
securing the faithful performance of Subdivider's obligations
hereunder, Subdivider shall give a bond, or similar
instrument, from an approved corporate surety satisfactory to
City in the amount of $787,500.00 as a guarantee and
warranty of the work, for a one(1) year period following the
completion and acceptance thereof against any defective work
or labor done, or defective materials furnished.
6. All notices to Subdivider may be sent to:
3480 Torrance Blvd., Ste. 300
Address
Torrance, CA 90503
State zip
or at such other address of which City shall actually receive
notice in writing specifically calling attention to this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS, A California Limited Partnership
BY President
Greg ot Del O TITLE
BY Secretary
Kurt Nelson TITLE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a municipal corporation
By
Mayor
Approved as to Form: -
City Attorney
5
Attest By
City Clerk
I
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of CALIFORNIA
County of LOS ANGELES
On JULY 3, :994
before me, PATTY GARVEY, NOTARY PUBLIC
'47E NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G G. 'JANE DOE. NOTAR aUBLJC
personally appeared GREG DELGADO & KURT NELSON
NAME,SI OF SIGNERiSi
� personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
—�� capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
.' ; : P"r"'CAa"E' signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
COMM. i 1CM720 Z
�C:•• '�.• NotarypLOlc_Cor+omio > or the entity upon behalf of which the
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
MYCOtnm.ExObfsAUG 22.1Vo7 person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPl
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
INDIVIDUAL
— CORPORATE OFFICER
- TLE S,
PARTNER(S)_ LIMITED
_ GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN, CONSERVATOR
_ OTHER
-
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
1,4+,1E OF-ERSON,S, OR ENTITY !ESI
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309.71 B4
Tri -Party Agreement
Concerning Domestic Water System
Tract 47851
This Agreement is entered into this i3th day of July, 1994,
by and between the City of Diamond Bar, ("City") Diamond Bar
East Partners, ("Subdivider") and Walnut Valley Water
District ("District"), concerning that certain subdivision
known as Vesting Tentative Tract No. 47851 ("Subdivision"),
and the Domestic Water Distribution System ("Domestic Water
System") required as a condition thereof.
R E C I T A L S
I. Subdivider has entered into a Subdivision Agreement
with the City concerning Subdivision improvements, the terms
of which provide that (i) Subdivider shall cause to be
constructed a Domestic Water System in accordance with plans
prepared by District and; (ii) that completion of
construction of said system shall be guaranteed to the City
through Subdivide'r's provision of surety bonds or other
instruments of guarantee, in amount sufficient to enable the
City to complete improvements should Subdivider default.
II. District policy requires that District shall design and
construct said Domestic Water System, and District prepared
an original estimate which projected costs of; (i)
$189,656.00 for "indirect costs" (engineering,
administrative costs, supply, capacity, etc.); (ii)
$150,000.00 for labor and; (iii) $128,980 for materials, for
a total estimate of $468,636.00. District has since accepted
a bid of $86,249.12 for materials, adjusting the total
estimate to $425,905.12.
III. Subdivider has paid in full the sum of $189,656.00 for
indirect system costs, and has sufficient acreage credits to
completely pay the cost of materials, leaving only the
projected $150,000.00 in labor to complete the Domestic
Water System.
IV. Subdivider wishes to provide City with a surety bond in
an amount which reflects the above referenced payments and
credits, and City wishes to have sufficient guarantee that
it will retain the benefit of same, so that such bond will
be sufficient to enable it to complete system improvements
in the event of Subdivider's default.
Now Therefore, the Parties agree as follows:
A. Subdivider shallprovide and City shall accept a
surety bond guaranteeing completion of the Domestic Water
System in the amount of $187,500.00, being the projected
$150,000 remaining projected costs plus 25 percent
contingency factor.
B. District and Subdivider agree that in the event of
Subdivider's failure to cause completion of the Domestic
Water System in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision
Agreement, the City shall have the benefit of Subdivider's
payments and credits outlined in Recital paragraph III
hereof— and District shall, upon City's direction, complete
construction of the system improvements, subject only to
payment of remaining costs to complete as set forth herein.
C. Subdivider agrees that in the event that District's
accepted bid for remaining labor costs should exceed the
$150,000.00 projection by more than 25 percent, Subdivider
shall either promptly pay such overage, or deliver to City
an additional bond or other surety instrument sufficient to
guarantee that additional sum.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement
upon the date and year first written above.
DIAMOND BAR EAST PARTNERS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By Diamond ridge East Management Co., General Partner
regopy ue igadpl, vr�en
son, z�ecre
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
yor
Attest By
City Clerk
WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 91-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL STANDARDS OF OPERATION
WHEREAS, it is important to the successful operation of
any public organization that standards be established to define the
roles, responsibilities and expectations of the governing board and
staff in the operation of the organization; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of standards by the City
Council will promote understanding and trust among members of the
City Council and staff concerning their roles, responsibilities and
expectations for the operation of the City; and
WHEREAS, the establishment and periodic review of these
City Council policy standards will assist new members of the City
Council to better understand their role and responsibilities as
Council Members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Diamond Bar
as follows:
.9
Section 1. OPERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
A. The Council shall meet the first and third Tuesdays of each
month, commencing at 6:00 p.m. If the Council desires to
proceed past 11:30 p.m., the Council, at 11:00 p.m., will
determine which issues will be completed at that meeting and
which items will be continued to the next Tuesday meeting.
B. Public Comments are to be scheduled for 6:00 p.m., immediately
following the Flag Salute, Roll Call and Council Comments.
C. No action is to be taken on items raised under Public
Comments. Besides oral requests, citizens may also be
requested to put concerns in writing, if that the item(s) is
to be agendized, for a later Council meeting date, at the
discretion of the Council and City Manager.
D. At the beginning of the meeting, if there are a number of
people requesting to speak on a particular subject under
Public Comments, the Mayor may request that there be a
spokesperson and that the others limit their comments, speak
at the end of the meeting or contact Council or City Manager.
This does not apply to scheduled agenda items.
COUNCIL STA.IIDARDS
Page —.4o
Section 1. CFERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (CON'T1
E. In order to ensure that all members of the public have an
opportunity to speak, pertaining to issues that are not on the
meeting agenda, and that the Council is able to complete the
public's business, there shall be a five-minute limitation on
comments by the public unless otherwise prohibited by law. The
Mayor will be responsible for enforcing the time limits as
suggested. Any Council Member may request an extension of the
five-minute time limitation. If the Council concurs that the
nature of the issue warrants an extension of time, the time
limit may be extended.
F. The Council will not hold a public hearing on items scheduled
under Departmental Reports or Council Concerns. If just one
or two people desire to speak on the item, the Council will
listen to their comments. If more than two persons at the
meeting desire to speak on an item, the Council may reschedule
the item on the agenda of a subsequent meeting.
G. with Council approval, Mayor may schedule Council review of
agenda items out of their prescribed order on the printed
agenda.
H. Significant proposed changes to City ordinances shall be set
for public hearing.
I. The Council Member making a motion shall either restate the
motion or have the City Clerk restate the motion, before the
vote, to clarify the motion for the public and staff.
J. Council Members should not get into a debate with a member of
the pubic or staff at a Council meeting.
K. The City Council will, on a quarterly basis, agendize and
prioritize those significant items to be scheduled as future
Council study session topics.
L. If an applicant submits a new site plan for a development or
if the City Council requests changes in the submitted site
plan, the public hearing will be continued at least two weeks
to allow time for staff review.
M. Any written correspondence or other materials received at a
City Council meeting (from the public or staff) will be
documented with a receipt time and date by the City Clerk and
distribution indicated. If the City Clerk does not receive a
copy of the written submittal, it will not be considered to
have been received or acted upon by the City Council.
COUNCIL STP.NDARDS
Page Three
Section 1. OPERATION OF CITY COLT+CIL MEETINGS (CON'T)
N. All minutes of City Council meetings shall be composed
utilizing an action -taken format; rather than a transcript
format. All meetings shall be audiotaped, in their entirety,
for Council, public and staff reference. City Council and
Planning Commission tapes shall be retained for two years,
from the date of the meeting. All other Commission and
Committee meeting tapes shall retained, until the approved
minutes of a meeting have been reported to the City Council.
0. Any concerns by a Council Member over the performance of a
City employee during a Council meeting should be privately
directed to the City Manager to ensure the concern is properly
addressed.
Section 2. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. CITY COMMISSIONS AND PRESS
RELATIONS
A. Individual Council Members will have the right to attend
meetings but are cautioned about becoming involved in the
meeting's discussions and/or violating the Brown Act.
B. written committee reports will be given to the Council on
significant committee recommendations and/or actions.
C. New ideas or suggested programs will be presented to the full
Council before presenting to the media.
Section 3. COUNCIL MEMBER PRESENTATIONS AT OTHER AGENCIES AND
GROUPS
A. If a member of the City Council represents the City before
another governmental agency, organization, the Council Member
will first indicate the majority position of the Council.
Personal opinions and comments may be expressed only if the
Council Member clarifies that these statements do not
represent the position of the City Council.
Section 4. CITY COUNCIL RELATIONSHIPS WITH.CITY STAFF
A. There will be mutual respect from both staff and Council -
members of their respective roles and responsibilities, when
expressing criticism in public session.
B. In public session, City staff members
members, utilizing Mayor, councilman
Council members will address all staff.
or Ms. rather than the person's first
will address Council
or Councilwoman; and,
members, utilizing Mr.
names.
COUNCIL " ` ^A.DS
Page =cur
Section 4. CITY COUNCIL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CIfy STAFF (CON'"^)
C. City staff acknowledge that the Council is the City's policy
making body. The City Council acknowledges that staff
administers the Council's policies.
D. The Council, as the overall policy body, holds the City
Manager responsible for the administration of the City
Departments. The overall internal administration by the City
Manager is necessary in order to assure efficient and economic
operations of the various departments per Council direction.
E. The Council will direct the City Manager on all major or new
issues. A Council Member will not initiate any action or have
prepared any report that is significant in nature or initiate
any project or study, without the approval of a majority of
the City Council.
F. All written informational material requested by individual
Council Members will be submitted by staff to all Council -
members with the notation indicating which Council Member
requested the information.
G. Council will not attempt to coerce or influence staff in the
making of appointments, the awarding of contracts, the
selection of consultants, the processingof development
applications, or the granting of City licenses or permits.
H. Mail that is addressed to the Mayor and City Council will be
circulated by the City Manager to the City Council with a
comment as to which staff person will be assisting the Mayor
and/or Council Member in preparing a response.
I. The Mayor's response, when appropriate and the original
communication, will be submitted to Council members for their
information. Mail addressed to individual Council Members may
be responded to, by that Council Member.
K. Staff team sensitivity and support is important. Once a final
decision is reached by the Council, Planning Commission or
other City body, it will be accepted, supported and
implemented by staff.
Section S. LITIGATION AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
A. City Council Members will keep all written and verbal
information provided on matters that are confidential, under
State law, in strict confidence to insure that the City's
position is not compromised. No dissemination of information
or materials will be made to anyone, except Council Members,
City Attorney, City Manager or Assistant City Manager.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Five
Section 5. LITIGATION AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (CON'T
B . Lf the City Council in closed session has provided direction
to City staff on proposed terms and conditions for any type of
negotiations whether it be related to property acquisition or
disposal, a proposed or pending claims or litigation, and/or
employee negotiations, all contact with the other party will
be the designated City person(s) representing the City in the
handling of the negotiations or litigation. A Council Member
will not have any contact or discussion with the other party
or its representative involved with the negotiation during
this time and will not communicate any discussion conducted in
closed sessions.
section 6. INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBER RESPONS
A. Frequent communication is an important and integral part of
Council relationships and will be the standard of operation.
B. Respect for each individual Council Members interpersonal
style will be a standard of operation. Courtesy and
sensitivity to individual points of view will be a standard
of operation.
C. On areas where Council Members disagree, especially on the
process to be used, discussions will occur to facilitate a
clear direction.
D. Council approach to authority is collegial rather than
individual.
E. council Members will keep an open mind on all issues.
F. Individual Council Members, on matters pertaining to upcoming
or antic4pated items where a public hearing will be held, will
maintain as near neutral position as possible to assure not
only the appearance but the actual degree of openness that is
attendant to our community responsibility.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
1991.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December.
•'
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Six
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar held on 3rd day of December 3. 1991, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Miller, Forbing, M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Papen, Werner
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:- None
LYN A BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
RESOLUTION NO. 89-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING COMMITTEES OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
A. Recitals.
(i) The'City Council desires to establish standing
committees of the City Council for review and recommendation to
the City Council, as a whole, with respect to issues facing the
community.
(ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution.
2. The City Council hereby establishes the following
committees of the City Council:
(i) Personnel;
(ii) Parks and Recreation;
(iii) Planning and Zoning; and
(iv) Finance; and
(v) Landscaping Districts.
1
The above -referenced committees shall be considered
stand ng committees of the City Council and members of the City
Council shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the advice and
consent of the remaining members of the City Council.
4. The City Manager and City Attorney shall provide
such staffing and clerical support as may be deemed required by
the committees established hereby.
5. The committees established hereby, and any ad hoc
committees established hereinafter shall review, analyze, report
to the City Council and make recommendations with respect to
matters referred to any such committee by the City Council.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
1989.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 6th day of June
Mayor
T, - ==?TL. VAN NOR' City Clerk of the City of
D_a^end Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
at a regular fleeting of the City Council of the City
cf DLamcnd Bar held on the 4�:' day of ,,,no , 1989,
and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
cf t:ne City of Diamond Bar held on the day of .rune
1989, by the following vote:
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager k\
RE: Brown Act - Council Continuing Subject Matter
Committees
DATE: May 17, 1994
ISSUE:
Brown Act affect upon City Council, less than a quorum,
continuing subject matter committees.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council modify the existing
continuing subject matter committee approach to issue
analysis by eliminating that type of less than a quorum
committee; and, replacing less than a quorum of the Council
issue analysis with a specific issue ad hoc committee
approach.
DISCUSSION:
The recent amendments to the Brown Act have changed the
rules as they apply to less than a quorum of the Council
committees (a memorandum regarding the affect of the new
changes on such committees is attached). Besides the
disadvatages to a less than than a quorum committee member
related to privately discussing issues within the ambit of
their continuing subject matter committee, the requirements
of the Brown Act result in virtually every less than a
quorum committee meeting becoming a "mini" -Council meeting
complete with notice, agenda, record, staff reports, staff
presence, meeting space which accommodates public attendance
and appropriate follow-up activities.
The City Council currently has designated twenty (20)
continuing subject matter committees, comprised of less than
a quorum of the Council. Each committee formally meets with
varying degrees of frequency, ranging from bi-weekly to once
or twice a year. However, under the Brown Act, the
frequency of meetings is not the determining criterion.
Rather, it is the designation of a continuing subject matter
jurisdiction that determines the applicability of the Brown
Act.
Council Committees
May 12, 1994
Page Two
DISCUSSION (con't):
The contraints and burdens placed upon continuing subject
matter committee members and staff would not appear to be
beneficial or desireable vis a vis the relatively few
meetings that most of the committees hold. Instead, the
Council may wish to consider the retention of a very few
continuing subject matter committees, e.g., Finance/Budget,
Personnel.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager `rW
RE: Brown Act Requirements re Less Than Quorum Meetings Of A Legislative
Body
DATE: April 29, 1994
ISSUE:
A question has been raised regarding the application of the Brown Act as it
relates to less than a quorum meeting of members of a legislative body.
BROWN ACT:
California Government Code Section 54952 defines a "legislative body" to be:
"...the governing body of a local agency...a commission... committee, board, or
other body of a local agency,... whether permanent or temporary, decision-making
or advisory, created by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a
legislative body. However, advisory committees, composed solely of the members
of the legislative body which are less than a quorum of the legislative body are not
legislative bodies, except that standing committees of a legislative body,
irrespective of their composition, which have continuing subject matter
jurisdiction, or a meeting schedule fixed by charter, ordinance, resolution, or
formal action of a legislative body are legislative bodies for purposes of this
chapter (The Brown Act)."
DISCUSSION:
Less than a quorum, that is less than a majority, of a legislative body may have
contacts or conversations between members of the legislative body and/or any
other persons, except that there cannot be any use of direct communication,
personal intermediaries, or technological devices employed by a majority of the
members of the legislative body to develop a collective concurrence as to action to
be taken on an item by members of the legislative body.
Diamond Bar legislative bodies include: City Council, Planning
Commission, Parks and Recreation Commisssion, Traffic and
Transportation Commission, General Plan Advisory Committee, Industry
Materials Recovery Facility Committee, Multi -Cultural and Resources
Committee, Council continuing subject matter sub -committees.
BROWN ACT
PAGE TWO
DISCUSSION (CONT):
Simply stated. Individual members and/or less than a quorum group of members
of the Council, Commissions, or Committees can meet with each other and/or
members of the public and not be subject to the requirements of the Brown Act,
subject to the certain exceptions discussed above.
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
(Effective 12-14-93)
�K0 2
California Contract Cities Association Harmony Anserl
Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir., 10810 Paramount, Suite 202, Downey, 90241, 310-861-3908
Meets 3rd'Wednesdav of each month at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30 p.m., dinner, various
restaurant locations of host City. Reservations required.
CLOUT Bill Alexander, Chairman, Ansarl
Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, 8280 Utica St., Ste. 160, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA 91730, 987-1012
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 7:30 a.m., Ontario Airport Marriott
Council of Governments (COG)
D.B. Chamber of Commerce Werner
Maria Ochsner, Gen. Mgr., 22640 E. Golden Springs, Suite A, 91765, 861-2121
Board of Directors: Meets 3rd Monday at 6:30 p.m., Chamber Office. Executive Committee:
Meets Tuesday at noon prior to monthly Board Meeting, at various restaurants, if needed.
East San Gabriel Valley Planning Committee DeStefeno
Chris Lancaster, 818-858-7212
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m., at various restaurant locations of host city.
Planning Directors Sub -Committee:
Meets 4th Monday of each month at 12:00 noon at Cal Poly.
Foothill Transit Zone papers Harmony
Bill Forsythe, 100 N. Barranca #980, W. Covina, 91791, 818-967-3147
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at above address.
Four -Corners Study Steering Committee Werner Ansarl
Meets as needed.
L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21 Warner Harmony
Charles Carry, Chief Engineer & Gen. Mgr., 1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier 90601-4998
Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier 90601-4998, 310-699-7411
Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at District Office
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
League of Calif. Cities = L.A. County Division Werner Harmony
Jack O'Neil, Exec. Dir., 600 E. Huntington Dr., Ste. C, Monrovia 91016, 818-305-1315
Meets 1 st Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at Almansor Court, 700 S. Almansor Street,
Alhambra
L.A. County City Selection Committee Werner Harmony
Larry J. Monteith, Secretary, 383 Hall of Administration, 500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles,
90012, 213-974-1431
Meets: After the League of Calif. Cities - L.A. County Division Meeting - (Approx. 8:30 p.m.)
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Ansad Warner
David Smith, Exec. Dir., 14156 Magnolia Blvd., Ste. 103, Sherman Oaks 91423, 818-907-
1664, FAX 818-784-1187
Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at various locations. Executive Session
5:00 p.m.
San Gabriel Valley Coalition Warner Harmony
Bill Forsythe (818)967-4700
Meets first Monday of each month 5:00 p.m., Arcadia City Hall, 240 W. Huntington,
Arcadia 91007
S.A.N.E. Program/Council Liaison Warner
Blanche Wilson, Starr Center
Colima & Telegraph, Whittier
Contact: Audrey Warner, W.V.U.S.D., 595-1261
Meets "as needed"
Sister Cities International Warner Ansad
120 S. Payne Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, 703-836-3535
FAX: 703-836-4815
Southeast Mosquito Abatement District Harmony
9510 Garfield Ave., South Gate, 90280, 310-927-6526
Meets 2nd Thursday at address above at 7:30 p.m.
Southern California Assn. of Governments (SCAG) Harmony Ansad
Main Office, 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, 90017, 213-236-1800
Tom Sykes, Representative for Dist. 37, City of Walnut, 595-7543
General Assembly meets annually each March - location to be announced
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
Southern California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Miller Harmony
4952 La Palma Ave., La Palma, 90623, 714-827-3361
General Board Committee meets annually each July - location to be announced
L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority papen
818 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Los Angeles 90017
Meets: as necessary
Rev. June 7, 1994
City of Industry L_iaisom
Meets "as needed"
Animal Control
Meets "as needed"
City on Line Technical
Meets "as needed"
Code Enforcement Committee
Meets "as needed"
Economic Development
Meets "as needed"
Entry Signs
Meets "as needed"
CITY COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEES
(Effective 12-14-93)
Werner/Ansarl
Papenl llor
Werner
Werner/Ansarl
Ansari/Harmony
M111e1Papen
Finance
Ansarl/Harmony
Meets "as needed"
Graffiti
MilledPapen
Meets "as needed"
General Plan Advisory Committee
Wernw1Ansarf
Meets 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month
Historical Committee
Miller/Papen
Meets "as needed"
Jones Intercable
Werner/Harmony
Industry Materials Recovery Facility (IMRF)
Hamwny/Ansari
Library Funding
Multi -Cultural
Werner/Ansarl
Personnel
WernerlHarnwny
Meets "as needed"
Pomona Unified School District
Werner/Hainwny
Brenda Engdahl, 800 S. Garey Ave., Pomona 91769-2900, 622-0486
Mailing: P.O. Box 2900, Pomona 91769-2900, 622-0489
Meets: as necessary
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEES (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
Senior Citizen IssUes
Werner/Ansari
Meets "as needed"
Solid Waste
Haimony/Werner
Meets "as needed"
Ranch Festival
Miller/Papen
Meets "as needed"
Undeveloped Land Entitlements
Ansari/Harmony
Meets "as needed"
Walnut Valley Unified School Dist.
Werner/Ansarl
Joann Hanson, Sec'y., 880 S.
Lemon Ave., Walnut 91789, 595-1261
Meets 1st and 3rd Wednesdays.
7:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room
Wildlife
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
(Effective 12-14-93)
COMMITTEE DELEGATE ALTERNATE
California Contract Cities Association Harmony Ansarf
Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir., 10810 Paramount, Suite 202, Downey, 90241, 310-861-3908
Meets 3rd Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30 p.m., dinner, various
restaurant locations of host City. Reservations required.
CLOUT Bill Alexander, Chairman, Ansarf
Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, 8280 Utica St., Ste. 160, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA 91730, 987-1012
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 7:30 a.m., Ontario Airport Marriott
Council of Governments (COG)
D.B. Chamber of Commerce Werner
Maria Ochsner, Gen. Mgr., 22640 E. Golden Springs, Suite A, 91765, 861-2121
Board of Directors: Meets 3rd Monday at 6:30 p.m., Chamber Office. Executive Committee:
Meets Tuesday at noon prior to monthly Board Meeting, at various restaurants, if needed.
East San Gabriel Valley Planning Committee DeStefeno
Chris Lancaster, 818-858-7212
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m., at various restaurant locations of host city.
Planning Directors Sub -Committee:
Meets 4th Monday of each month at 12:00 noon at Cal Poly.
Foothill Transit Zone papers Harmony
Bill Forsythe, 100 N. Barranca #980, W. Covina, 91791, 818-967-3147
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at 8:00 a.m, at above address.
Four -Corners Study Steering Committee Weiner Ansarf
Meets as needed.
L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21 Weiner Harmony
Charles Carry, Chief Engineer & Gen. Mgr., 1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier 90601-4998
Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier 90601-4998, 310-699-7411
Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at District Office
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
League of Calif. Cities : L.A. County Division Werner Harmony
Jack O'Neil, Exec. Dir., 600 E. Huntington Dr., Ste. C, Monrovia 91016, 818-305-1315
Meets 1 st Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at Almansor Court, 700 S. Almansor Street,
Alhambra
L.A. County City Selection Committee Werner Harmony
Larry J. Monteilh, Secretary, 383 Hall of Administration, 500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles,
90012, 213-9741431
Meets: After the League of Calif. Cities - L.A. County Division Meeting - (Approx. 8:30 p.m.)
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Ansari
Werner
David Smith, Exec. Dir., 14156 Magnolia Blvd., Ste. 103, Sherman Oaks91423, 818-907-
1664, FAX 818-784-1187
Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at various locations. Executive Session
5:00 p.m.
San Gabriel Valley Coalition Werner Harmony
Bill Forsythe (818)967-4700
Meets first Monday of each month 5:00 p.m., Arcadia City Hall, 240 W. Huntington,
Arcadia 91007
S.A.N.E. Program/Council Liaison Werner
Blanche Wilson, Starr Center
Colima & Telegraph, Whittier
Contact: Audrey Warner, W.V.U.S.D., 595-1261
Meets "as needed"
Sister Cities International Werner Ansarl
120 S. Payne Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, 703-836-3535
FAX: 703-836-4815
Southeast Mosquito Abatement District Harmony
9510 Garfield Ave., South Gate, 90280, 310-927-6526
Meets 2nd Thursday at address above at 7:30 p.m.
Southern California Assn. of Governments (SCAG) Harmony Ansarl
Main Office, 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, 90017, 213-236-1800
Tom Sykes, Representative for Dist. 37, City of Walnut, 595-7543
General Assembly meets annually each March - location to be announced
Rev. June 7, 1994
Finance
CITY COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEES
Meets "as needed"
(Effective 12-14-93)
City of Industry Liaison-
Werner/Ansari
Meets was needed"
Animal Control
Papen/Miller
Meets "as needed"
Historical Committee
City on Line Technical
Werner
Meets "as needed"
Jones Intercable
Code Enforcement Committee
Werner/Ansari
Meets "as needed"
Library Funding
Economic Development
Ansari/Harmony
Meets "as needed"
Personnel
Entry Signs
Mi/ler/Papen
Meets "as needed"
Pomona Unified School District
Finance
Ansari/Harmony
Meets "as needed"
Graffiti
Miller/Papers
Meets "as needed"
General Plan Advisory Committee
Weiner/Ansari
Meets 2nd & 4th Tuesdays of each month
Historical Committee
Miller/Papen
Meets "as needed"
Jones Intercable
Werner/Harmony
Industry Materials Recovery Facility (IMRF)
Harmony/Ansari
Library Funding
Multi -Cultural
Werner/Ansari
Personnel
Werner/Harmony
Meets "as needed"
Pomona Unified School District
Werner/Harmony
Brenda Engdahl, 800 S. Garay Ave.,
Pomona 91769-2900, 622-0486
Mailing: P.O. Box 2900, Pomona 91769-2900, 622-0489
Meets: as necessary
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
Southern California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Miller Harmony
4952 La Palma Ave., La Palma, 90623, 714-827-3361
General Board Committee meets annually each July - location to be announced
ELECTED POSITION --NOT APPOINTED BY MAYOR
L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Papen
818 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Los Angeles 90017
Meets: as necessary
Rev. June 7, 1994
CITY COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEES (Cont'd.)
(Effective 12-14-93)
Senior Citizen Issues
Meets "as needed"
Solid Waste
Meets "as needed"
Ranch Festival
Meets "as needed"
Undeveloped Land Entitlements
Meets "as needed"
Werner/Ansari
Harmony/Werner
Miller/Papen
Ansari/Harmony
Walnut Valley Unified School Dist. Werner/Ansari
Joann Hanson, Sec'y., 880 S. Lemon Ave., Walnut 91789, 595-1261
Meets 1st and 3rd Wednesdays 7:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room
Wildlife
Rev. June 7, 1994
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.4
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
InterOffice Memorandum
TO: City Councilmembers
FROM: Gary H. Werner, Mayor.--
SUBJECT:
ayorSUBJECT: Invitation from Haicheng unicipal Government
DATE: July 14, 1994
The City of Diamond Bar has received invitation from Mayor Wan Fumin of the Haicheng
Municipal Government, inviting representation from Diamond Bar at the Third
International Folk Arts Festival to be held in Haicheng, Liaoning Province, China. The
event is scheduled for August 26, 1994.
This invitation raises several questions for which I am seeking City Council action:
1. Should the Mayor and members of the City Council participate in the event in behalf of
the City of Diamond Bar? If the answer to this question is yes, than I would also solicit
the City Council's support of the following items which I pose in the form of
additional questions to the Council:
2. Shall the City also send a staff member (City Manager) to properly assist the
delegation?
3. Shall the City provide additional planning support in coordinating this trip with the
help of the Sister City Sub -Committee, the Economic Development Sub -Committee,
the Chamber ,of Commerce, the Diamond Bar Chinese Association and such other
local organizations that might express interest in assisting in the planning' of the
excursion?
4. Shall the City provide an official gift from the City of Diamond Bar to the City of
Haicheng? and to the Mayor and Council?
I asked that this matter be placed onto the July 19, 1994 agenda and that the matter be
dealt with in a timely manner because time is of the essence if the City is to respond in the
affirmative.
The first-class ecological environment and the warmth and
friendliness from you and your Congress members made deep impres-
sion upon us. We are willing to do continous efforts to streng-
then and develop the friendly relationship between our two cities.
The Third International Folk Arts Festival Will be held on
Aug.26 in our vcity. At that time, $31 artists from 5 countries
will come to Haicheng to put on the performance. Warmly welcome
the honourable Mayor ,Madame Werner and other Congress members
to be guests in Haicheng.
With best; wishes,
Yours truly
Wan Famin
Mayor Wan Firmin
l- f
* ,
11
Haicheng Municiple
Government
Liaoning Province,
China
June 21, 1994
Mayor Gary H. Werner
The Diamond Bar City
-
r�
- -•
California, U.S.A.
--
The honourable Mayor;
-
How are you getting
along?
Sincerely thank you
for your kind and warm reception when
we visited your city not
long time ago.
The first-class ecological environment and the warmth and
friendliness from you and your Congress members made deep impres-
sion upon us. We are willing to do continous efforts to streng-
then and develop the friendly relationship between our two cities.
The Third International Folk Arts Festival Will be held on
Aug.26 in our vcity. At that time, $31 artists from 5 countries
will come to Haicheng to put on the performance. Warmly welcome
the honourable Mayor ,Madame Werner and other Congress members
to be guests in Haicheng.
With best; wishes,
Yours truly
Wan Famin
4
e
'' AV
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Clair Harmony, Mayor Pro Tem
RE: Project Signs - City Council Names
DATE: May 17, 1994
ISSUE:
Should the City Council ban the placing of Council Member
names on public works construction project signs?
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council no longer place the
names of Council Members on public works construction
project signs.
DISCUSSION:
The monies used to fund public works construction projects
come from a variety of sources. The planning, design and
actual constrution of a public works project involve the
work and effort of many community persons. Instead of
singleling out just the five City Council members for credit
on project signs, the credit for the construction of public
works projects by the City should be,more general, e.g.,
...brought to you by the people of Diamond Bar..." or
��...your tax dollars at work for community's betterment..."
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.7
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
CITY OF DIAMONn M
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 16',
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994 REPORT DATE: July 15, 1994
FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer
TITLE: Installation of Diagonal Parking at Heritage Park Community Center
SUMMARY: The Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club is requesting additional
parking along the Heritage Park Community Center frontage on Brea Canyon
Road. On April 14, 1994, the Traffic and Transportation Commission
recommended implementation of the diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Road. At
this time, pursuant to Section 22502 of the California Vehicle Code, parallel
parking is allowed in front of the Heritage Park Community Center.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council deny the installation of diagonal
parking along Brea Canyon Road at Heritage Park Community Center and direct
staff to consider on -street parking alternatives as part of the future Brea
Canyon Road Improvement Project. The Traffic and Transportation Commission
recommends the installation of diagonal parking.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing
Notification
_ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file
in City Clerk's Office)
Ordinances(s) X Other: Minutes of 4-14-94 TIT
_ Agreement(s) Commission meeting and
Aerial Map
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City
reviewed by the City Attorney? _ Yes X No
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
REVIEWED BY:
T rrence L. langer
City Manage
Assistant City Manager t Interim City Engineer
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Installation of Diagonal Parking.at Heritage Park
Community Center
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Feasibility of installing diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Road at Heritage
Park Community Center.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council deny the installation of diagonal parking along Brea
Canyon Road at Heritage Park Community Center and direct staff to consider
on -street parking alternatives as part of the future Brea Canyon Road
Improvement Project. The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends
the installation of diagonal parking.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed recommendation has no financial impact on the City's FY 1994-95
budget. Cost to implement diagonal parking would be approximately $2,000.00.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
In addition to the on-site parking at the Heritage Park Community Center,
members of the Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club utilize Brea Canyon Road for
parking during their regularly scheduled meetings on Tuesdays.
At the request of the senior citizens, on April 14, 1994, the Traffic and
Transportation Commission discussed the need for diagonal parking along the
Heritage Park Community Center frontage on Brea Canyon Road. The Commission
subsequently recommended that the City Council approve the implementation of
the diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Road to provide additional spaces at
subject site.
At this time, pursuant to Section 22502 of the California Vehicle Code,
parallel parking is allowed in front of the Heritage Park Community Center.
Angle parking may be created by Ordinance by the City Council.
Currently, there are 36 on-site parking at the Center. Two of the 36 are
handicap parking spaces. Approximately 20 vehicles can parallel park on Brea
Canyon Road adjacent to the Center. Angle parking would add approximately
thirty (30) spaces on Brea Canyon Road. Staff has previously recommended
that any parking modifications be incorporated with future improvements to
Brea Canyon Road or that there be consideration for further parking on-site.
The anticipation by the seniors is that additional on -street parking is more
convenient than the distance involved by parking on-site. Staff's primary
concern is one of safety and the potential conflict between cars backing out
to traffic on Brea Canyon Road.
Page Two
Diagonal Parking
July 19, 1994
The lack of adequate visibility for the driver during the back -out maneuver
is a principal hazard. Although there appears to be sufficient distance for
a vehicle to back out of an angle space and not back into traffic, we believe
there is significant potential for there to be such vehicle conflicts. The
sheriff holds a similar opinion. Additional hazard results from the driver
who stops suddenly upon seeing a vehicle ahead in the process of backing out.
Because empty stalls are difficult to perceive with angle parking, motorists
who are seeking a place to park must either proceed slowly (thus tying up
traffic) in order to see the empty stall, or slow down abruptly when they
come upon an empty space.
Alternatives
Should the City Council decide to proceed, staff recommends the following:
1. Consideration be given to the installation of stop signs on Brea Canyon
Road at Cold Springs Lane. A warrant study has not been conducted.
However, staff believes City Council would need to make appropriate
safety findings; and
2. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance and provide appropriate public
hearings for consideration.
PREPARED BY•
David G. Liu
Tseday Aberra
II C
April 14, 1994 Page 8
finalized and go before the City Council for final approval.
At this stage it is only a conceptual plan, a layout for
review and input from the Commission.
C/Gravdahl commented that all Commissioners need to review the
materials before acting upon the recommendation.
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/ Gravdahl that this agenda
item be continued to the next meeting in May.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
B. Diagonal Parking at Heritage Park Community Center.
AA/Aberra reported that a safety concern had been brought
before staff regarding diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Road at
Heritage Park Community Center. It is being brought to the
Commission for discussion and comment to either include this
matter as part of the Brea Canyon Road Improvements Project or
recommend to the City Council to install "Parallel Parking
Only" signs along the Heritage Park Community Center frontage
on Brea Canyon Road.
Bob Quartucy, 21446 Broken Arrow Drive, stated that he would
like to see more handicapped parking spaces to accommodate the
seniors attending the meetings at Heritage Park Community
Center.
C/Gravdahl commented that jurisdiction of the grounds at
Heritage Park is with the Parks and Recreation Commission, and
-- recommended ---that -Mr. Quartucy takes his concerns--tcr- -that--` '
Commission. He suggested a local shuttle bus service
utilizing Proposition A Funds. He inquired the use of the
City's two vans in the future.
SE/Liu reported that a comprehensive analysis of the existing
condition of the two vans is in process. Pending upon the
outcome of that report, appropriate recommendations will be
forwarded to the City Council.
Chair/Ortiz asked for clarification as to the correct
Commission to which Mr. Quartucy should take his concerns.
SE/Liu responded that the Parks and Recreation Commission, as
well as, the Planning Commission would be involved with the
request for additional on site parking.
April 14, 1994 Page 9
Mr. Quartucy, responded that he is at the Traffic and
Transportation Commission for off site parking and the future
improvements of Brea Canyon Road.
SE/Liu reported that the limits of, the Brea Canyon Road
Improvement Project are between Fountain springs Drive and
Cool springs Drive. For the immediate area south of Heritage
Park, staff is recommending the two-lane option as presented
to the Commission previously with right and left -turn pockets
at the appropriate locations or intersections. The frontage
in front of Heritage Park would specifically be designed to
allow parking. Currently, pursuant to the California Vehicle
Code, diagonal parking is not allowed. The Commission could
recommend to the City Council a local ordinance which would
allow diagonal parking at the Heritage Park.
Sgt. Rawlings confirmed that Section 22502 of the Vehicle Code
states that vehicles must park on the right and within 18" of
the curb, and that local ordinance is the means in which
diagonal parking can be established.
VC/Istik stated that even though on site parking is a Parks
and Recreation issue, he thinks the City should do something
to accommodate the seniors. He further stated that to
accommodate more visitors, diagonal parking should be
recommended to the City Council as part of the Brea Canyon
Road widening project .
C/Esposito requested staff's clarification on posting
"Parallel Parking Only" signs along the Heritage Park
Community Center frontage on Brea Canyon Road.
SE/Liu responded that it appears the situation of diagonal
parking is presenting a problem to the City and that the
r.- posting -of , 0-Para11e1-Parking. only" -signs is -to-reinfores-•the
California Vehicle Code.
Chair/Ortiz commented that signs are technically not needed
for enforcement of the California Vehicle Code.
Sgt. Rawlings commented that the increase. of handicapped
spaces on site would decrease the total number of parking
spaces available.
Chair Ortiz stated that the increase is for temporary usage
only.
Oscar Law commented that the traf f is in the Heritage Park area
is horrible. He wants to see sidewalks, curbing and parking
on Brea Canyon Road for visitors to the park.
April 14, 1994
Page 10
C/Gravdahl suggested that perhaps a retaining wall could be
built so that an area could be widened, paved and an asphalt
berm be poured to allow diagonal parking.
Moved by Chair/Ortiz and seconded by C/Gravdahl to deny the
recommendation brought from staff to install "Parallel Parking
Only" signs.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
VC/Istik then moved that the Traffic and Transportation
Commission recommend to the City Council and advise the Parks
and Recreation Commission that more handicapped spaces be
installed at Heritage Park as soon as possible.
Chair/Ortiz seconded the motion and with VC/Istik's
concurrence amended the motion to include changing the spaces
of the handicap location from the restroom side to the
entrance of the building with the ramp directly in front of
the entrance and change the color of the ramp from blue to
white striping. Furthermore, to increase the permanent
handicapped parking spaces to a total of six, three on each
side of the ramp.
VC/Istik concurred with the amendment to the motion.
Sgt. Rawlings remarked that enforcement of temporary handicap
parking would be difficult because an enforceable handicap
parking space is defined in the Vehicle Code as having a sign
in front of the space with the ricture of the wheelchair and
appropriate pavement markings. Loth the sign and the pavement
marking are required.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
SE/Liu stated that he would forward this recommendation to the
Parks and Recreation Commission and to the City Council in a
timely manner.
VC/Istik stated that prior to the Brea Canyon Road Improvement
Project, measures need to be taken to offset the current
under -parking situation at Heritage Park.
April 14, 1994
Page 11
Moved by VC/Istik and seconded by C/Esposito to recommend to
the City Council to implement diagonal parking at Heritage
Park by directing staff to design a viable solution as soon as
possible.
The Motion carried 4-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES: Gravdahl, Esposito, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Chavers
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
vC/Istik requested staff to check with CalTrans about
relocating the "Chino Hills Next Exit" sign for Chino Hills on
the SR -57 to Chino Hills Parkway rather than the Grand Avenue
Exit.
SE/Liu responded that the City Council is aware of this issue,
and that Mayor Werner has sent a letter to Mr. Jerry Baxter of
CalTrans regarding the impact of this "Chino Hills Next Exit"
sign.
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF
A. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for the Intersection of
Diamond Bar Boulevard and Silver Hawk Drive.
SE/Liu stated that as requested by Chair/Ortiz on March 10,
1994, the report (dated 11/1/91) is being presented for the
�. ��� Commissimn's_information-, :review and discussion:.,.-For-FiscaL,
Year 1994-95 there are seven warrant studies being requested
for budget consideration.
VC/Istik commented that the warrant study, dated November 1,
1991, is no longer adequate based on the finding of five
accidents in one year. He suggested that another updated
warrant study is needed.
C/Gravdahl inquired about the cost of a traffic signal warrant
analysis, how many traffic signals are being proposed in
Fiscal Year 1994-95, and how many open warrants are
outstanding.
SE/Liu responded that the fee of a traffic signal warrant
analysis is approximately $1,000.00. There are three signals
being recommended to the City Manager/City Council for
construction in Fiscal Year 1994-95, and there are no
outstanding warrants.
k M
4--fI
-ii
i4�� f r,� •
1.
t
0ITV aF MUM AU
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. ") . ;----
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994 REPORT DATE: July 15, 1994
FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer
TITLE: Request for parking along southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, between
Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road
SUMMARY: Saint Denis Catholic Church, located at 2151 Diamond Bar Boulevard,
is requesting permission from the City to park along southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road on Sundays.
Staff presented this item to the Traffic and Transportation Commission and
recommended that Saint Denis Catholic Church not be permitted to park along
Diamond Bar Boulevard on a regular basis (i.e. every Sunday). However, the
Commission is recommending that Saint Denis' request to park on Sundays be
granted for two years.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council deny Saint Denis Catholic Church's
request for on -street parking on a permanent basis on Sundays along
southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon
Road. The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends approval of the
on -street parking for a two-year period.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
460N low VAMN 161014 114 0 1&1 QF
_ Public Hearing
Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file
in City Clerk's Office)
X Other: Minutes of May 12. 1994
TIT Commission meeting,
Saint Denis' letter of
request
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City
reviewed by the City Attorney? Yes X No
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No
Which Commission? Traffic i Transportation Commission
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
REVIEWED BY:
,7 1-
errence L. langer F ank N. 1J6fi6?'_/ge A. Wentz
City Manager Assistant City Manager 04nterim City Engineer
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: July 19, 1994
ACs1SnLJA JNU •
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for parking along southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard,
between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road
ISSUE STATEMENT:
To determine whether parking on Sundays shall be granted to Saint Denis
Catholic Church along southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, between Acacia Hill
Road and Morning Canyon Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council deny Saint Denis Catholic Church's request for on -
street parking on a permanent basis on Sundays along southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road. The Traffic and
Transportation Commission recommends approval of the on -street parking for a
two-year period.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed recommendation has no financial impact on the City's FY 1994-95
budget. If permission were granted, the cost would be approximately
$2,000.00 to manufacture and post the signs.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On a case-by-case basis, the Department of Public Works reviews requests from
churches and organizations to park on major arterials during special events.
Saint Denis Catholic Church, located at 2151 Diamond Bar Boulevard, has
requested on -street parking for every Sunday along southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road. According to
Saint Denis, the existing on-site parking facility is not sufficient to
accommodate its attendees. In the past, Saint Denis has been granted
permission to park on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, generally between
Morning Canyon Road and Silver Hawk Drive, but only during special church
services, functions, and holidays.
At the present, there are a total of 281 on-site parking spaces, three of
which are handicapped spaces. According to Saint Denis, their maximum
building capacity is 1,000. For that capacity, 333 parking spaces are needed
pursuant to the City's current requirements.
This matter was reviewed and discussed by the Traffic and Transportation
Commission on May 12, 1994. Minutes of this meeting is attached. To
maintain a consistent policy with other churches and organizations regarding
parking on major arterials and to minimize potential impact to the bicycle
lane along Diamond Bar Boulevard, staff recommended to the Commission that
Page Two
Saint Denis: Parking request
July 19, 1994
Saint Denis' request for on -street parking along southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard be limited to special church services and functions only.
Staff continues to believe that if such permission is granted, similar
requests may be received from other churches and they would expect approval
unless unusual circumstances exist.
After receiving input from both the Church and staff, the Traffic and
Transportation Commission recommends that the City Council grant Saint Denis
Catholic Church permission to park along southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard,
between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road, every Sunday for a period
of two years. Furthermore, the Commission recommended that the result or
impact of that permission be assessed after two years.
A draft resolution has been prepared and is attached for the City Council
should you choose to grant the parking request.
Alternatives
Should the City Council determine that the parking request be granted, staff
recommends that mitigation measures be required of the church to ease the
existing congestion that is caused during the morning hours. Mitigation
could include the church providing two officers to control traffic during the
worship services in the morning.
PREPARED BY:
David G. Liu
Tseday Aberra
RESOLUTION NO. 94 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PERMITTING; PARKING ON SUNDAYS ALONG SOUTHBOUND DIAMOND
BAR BOULEVARD BETWEEN ACACIA HILL ROAD AND MORNING CANYON
ROAD
A. RECITALS.
(i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission
considered this matter at a public meeting on May 12, 1994.
At the meeting of May 12, 1994, the
Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the
establishment of an on -street parking on Sundays along southbound
Diamond Bar Boulevard between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon
Road as appropriate.
The Traffic and Transportation Commission
recommends parking on Sundays along southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road be
established.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Said action is pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los
Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the
City Council;
2. The City Council hereby finds that the public health,
safety, and welfare will be best protected by establishing an on -
street parking as herein prescribed;
3. said resolution provides for on -street parking on the
westerly side of southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard between Acacia
Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road;
4. On -street parking shall only be permitted on Sundays.
5. This resolution shall not become effective until the on -
street parking is properly posted by the City; and
6. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby
authorize and direct the Mayor to cause the on -street parking as
herein defined be established.
PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , 1994
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted
and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar held on day of
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
, 1994 by the
ATTEST:
City Clerk, city of Mmmd Bar
ST. DENIS CHURCH
2151 DL4NlOND BAR BLVD. • P.O. BOX 4096
DL4N1OND BAR • CALIFORNIA 91765
TEL (909) 861-7106 • FAX (909) 861-2697
iU
May 4, 1994 M
�rn
Mr David G. Liu, P. E. ;n
Senior Engineer r,
21660 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar Blvd. CA. 91765-4177
Dear Mr. Liu: _ _+
As pastor of St.. Denis Catholic Church in Diamond Bar, a parish
community of some 5200. families with nine regular weekend services,
and often times as many as fourteen, depending on the number of
weddings, I am writing to you regarding our parking situation.
We are the only Catholic Church in Diamond Bar with people coming
from Pomona, Chino Hills, Brea, Walnut and other places. On certain
occasions during the year we make special requests to the City for
permission to park on Diamond Bar Blvd. I understand that to be the
case too before my coming to Diamond in March 1993. The City has
been very gracious in granting these requests and on behalf of St.
Denis parishioners, I thank you.
Following a conversation with Ms Eileen Ansari on Saturday last and
with Ms. Phyllis Papen on March 20, I. am writing to request
permission for our parishioners to park on Diamond Bar Blvd between
Acacia Hill and Morning Canyon Road on Sundays between 6.00 AM and
9.00 PM. This would help us tremendously. Perhaps the signs could
be covered or have them read "No Parking except Sunday". I would be
happy to appear in person before the Traffic and Transportation
Committee if you deem this necessary.
Thank you for your consideration of my request.
Sincerely, _ p
Rev! Msgr. James J. Lou/ghnane
Pastor
May 12, 1994
Page 4
Currently, parents may be prohibited to use the on-site
parking lot.
C/Chavers commented that his recollection of the discussion
that led to the striping was such that the driveways to the
on-site parking lot are on the inside of a gradual horizontal
curve. Part of the reason for the extension of the red
curbing as painted was to allow those exiting the driveway to
actually see oncoming traffic, this eliminating the need for
those vehicles to pull out into the traffic lane to see on-
coming traffic. The remainder of curve was nominal so the
entire curb area was marked red, since it is the familiar
color to most people. He concurs and supports staff's
recommendation to leave the area as is.
Chair/Ortiz stated that educating the schools and parents is
another option to eliminate the on-going traffic problems and
matters of safety.
Moved by C/Chavers and seconded by VC/Istik to accept staff's
recommendation and encourage traffic enforcement as deemed
necessary by the Sheriff's Department. Further, the
Commission requested staff to explore the possibility of
distributing flyers which convey the intention and purposes of
the traffic markings in front of Lorbeer Junior High School.
Chair/Ortiz asked Sgt. Rawlings to provide to the Commission
the number of citations given at the school site for the next
two months.
Sgt. Rawlings responded that his computer tracking does not
allow for parking citations, but that he would do a hand tally
on a day-to-day basis.
Chair/Ortiz requested the hand tally be done for the next two
months.
The Motion carried 3-0 with the following ROLL CALL vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Chavers, VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
None
None
Esposito, Gravdahl
A. Parking on Southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, Between Acacia
Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road.
AA/Aberra reported that it has been the procedure of the City
of Diamond Bar to receive and review, on a case-by-case basis,
requests from church organizations to park on major arterial
during special church services and functions. Saint Denis
May 12, 1994 Page 5
Catholic Church, located at 2151 Diamond Bar Boulevard, has
requested an on -street parking on southbound Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road
every Sunday. To date, churches and organizations have been
given permission to park on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard,
generally between Morning Canyon Road and Silver Hawk Drive
only during special church services or functions. They are
required to cover the existing "No Parking" signs with bags
and remove them after their events end.
Staff recommends Saint Denis, request for on -street parking be
limited to special church services and functions in order to
maintain a consistent policy with other churches and
organizations. Furthermore, to minimize impact to the bicycle
lane, it is necessary to regulate the parking activities by
various organizations along Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Monsignor James Loughnane, 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., who
represents approximately 5200 families at nine services every
weekend, commented that he is concerned about the availability
of parking spaces for the worshipers during Sunday services.
The services are staggered every hour and a half, but parking
spaces are not adequate. He asked for an additional parking
area on southbound Diamond Bar Blvd. between Acacia Hill Road
and Morning.Canyon Road during their Sunday church service.
C/Istik commented that the major roadways should be used to
move traffic, not to park vehicles, but since Sunday is not a
peak travel day on Diamond Bar Blvd., he felt he could support
the request. He suggested that it be approved with a
monitoring of the situation for a period of time.
C/Chavers commented that a precedence may be set in allowing
this request, and asked staff to research comments and/or
background information regarding parking versus the number of
seat capacity during the expansion of Saint Denis Church.
There may have been an exception noted for allowing the
construction without ample parking. This would establish a
reason other than sympathy and compassion for allowing parking
on an arterial. He commented that other requests could be
forthcoming to the Commission with no other reason than a need
for more parking.
SE/Liu responded that he would check with the Planning
Department to see what records might be available, and will
provide the information to the Commission and to the Church.
Chair/Ortiz asked if there had been any complaints from the
neighbors in the areas indicated. He commented by stating
that when parking on Diamond Bar Blvd. for special occasions
and holidays was approved, it had been determined that there
were no safety hazards since the bike lane was wide. He asked
Sgt. Rawlings if he was aware of any accidents with bicyclists
and motorists parked in the lane. He also asked about the
May 12, 1994 . Page 6
Monsignor's contact with members of the City Council and
inquired about their responses regarding this issue.
Monsignor Loughnane responded by saying that he had been told
Shady Hills Drive has become a shortcut to Pathfinder Road
from Diamond Bar Blvd., and had received complaints. He also
stated that he was told by Councilmembers to write a letter
and make a formal request to the Traffic and Transportation
Commission.
Sgt. Rawlings was not aware of any accidents with motorists
and bicyclists in the vicinity.
Chair/Ortiz commented that staff's report indicates that each
request is being reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and feels
the Commission can proceed with this premise, bearing in mind
any safety hazard involved. For the record, he commented that
he is a parishioner.
SE/Liu interjected with the Chair's permission to ask
Monsignor Loughnane, as the representative of Saint Denis
Church, if Saint Denis Church would be willing to pay for the
costs Iassociated with any proposed or recommended
modifications, in terms of the signs and the installation
costs.
Monsignor Loughnane, responded that he believed this request
will need to be approved by the church's finance committee.
Chair/Ortiz moved that the Commission deny staff's
recommendation and recommend to the City Council that the
request of Saint Denis Catholic Church for on -street parking
every Sunday on southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard., between
Acacia Hill Road and Morning Canyon Road be permitted.
VC/Istik seconded the motion and amended the recommendation to
have a time limit set for twenty-four (24) months at which
time the request would be reviewed to assess any issues of
safety which might come up in the interim.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
C/Chavers amended the motion to ask staff to go into the
archives and seek an engineering basis to determine if there
were some over-riding concerns for the size of the parking lot
and the approval of the church, and that it be included in the
recommendation to the City Council if found.
Chair/Ortiz approved the amendment.
The Motion was passed unanimously with the following ROLL CALL
vote:
May 12, 1994
AYES:
Chavers,
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ABSENT:
Esposito,
Page 7
VC/Istik, Chair/Ortiz
Gravdahl
VII. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS - None
VIII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
Chair/Ortiz conveyed C/Gravdahl's written comment which stated
that when he and C/Chavers were GPAC delegates they were
representatives of the Traffic and Transportation Commission
and would vote the consensus of the old Traffic and
Transportation Commission as far as circulation matters were
concerned. With the placement of the new members, he feels a
new consensus should be taken. By placing this item on the
next agenda, it allows the delegates to vote the consensus of
all the Traffic and Transportation Commissioners.
C/Chavers commented that he was at the last GPAC meeting,
which was held on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, and will continue to
attend as both a citizen and/or as a representative of the
Traffic and Transportation Commission.
C/Istik commented that he, too, has attended and provided
input at the GPAC meetings in the past and that he would also
be available as both a citizen and/or as a representative of
the Traffic and Transportation Commission.
Chair/Ortiz commented that C/Chavers and VC/Istik should
remain as representatives of the Traffic & Transportation
Commission to the GPAC Committee subject to any replacements
should either one be unable to attend. He also asked SE/Liu
if there was any feedback regarding the Traffic and
Transportation Commission recommendation to the Parks and
Recreation Commission on the handicapped parking at Heritage
Park issue.
SE/Liu responded that staff had conveyed the concerns and
comments of the Traffic and Transportation Commission to Mr.
Bob Rose, the Director of Community Services. Mr. Rose
contacted the Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club. The details
of the arrangements will be forthcoming.
IX. ITEMS FROM STAFF
A. Traffic Signal Policy for Private and Public Street
Intersections
SE/Liu reported that a copy of the Policy for Funding
Traffic Signals at Private and Public Street
Intersections is being presented as requested by the
Commission.
DRAFT
Friday: July 15, 1994
City of Diamond Bar e• 1
Meeting Agenda For pa g
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR WERNER
ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS ANSARI, PAPEN, MILLER,
Mayor Pro Tem Harmony and Mayor Werner
2. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND
ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 INCLUDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS, SPECIAL
FUNDS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR
ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREINSET
FORTH - Submitted for Council review and approval is
stie proposed
FY 1994-95 Annual budget and its accompanying
Continued from July 5, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 94 -XX approving and adopting a budget for FY
94-95.
Requested by: City Manager
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, -
None
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
5. COUNCIL COMMENTS:
6. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
6.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 20, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Eddie Reed - Swing Band - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden
Springs Rd.
6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 25, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.3 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 27, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Cody Bryant Band - Country Western/Blue Grass - Sycamore
Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Rd.
6.4 COL TECH COMMISSION - JULY 27, 1994- 7:00 P.M., CITY HALL,
21660 E. Copley Dr.
6.5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - JULY 28 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
6.6 MULTI -CULTURAL - AUGUST 1, 1994 - 7:00 P.M., AQMD ROOM
CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
City of Diamond Bar Friday: July 151 1994
e• 2
Meeting Agenda For pa g
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
6.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
NSENTTCALENDAR:
7.X PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.1.1 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 23, 1994 - RECEIVE AND FILE
7.1.2 REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.77.2.1 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.2.2 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 12, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: City Engineer
7. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.3.1 REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.3.2 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 28, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.3.3 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 26, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.4 VOUCHER REGISTER - APPROVE
VOUCHER REGISTER DATED JULY 19, 1994
in the amount
Requested by: City Manager
7, IFICATION OF CONTRACT AMOUNTS:
7.5.1 LIZ MEY
Recommended Action:
Requested by:
7.5.2 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY BOYS CLUB
Re ded Action:
Requested by: Commun rvices Director
7 3 GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS
Recommended Ac
Requested by: Community Servic ector
City of Diamond Bar
Meeting Agenda For
PRIVATE
July 19, 1994
.4 ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
Requested by: Community
Friday: July 15, 1994
Page: 3
Director
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: OF
RESOLUTION NO. 89-97H: AA RESOLUTION CITYI'5 CONFLIE CITY CTOFCIL OF
8.8/ -are
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ITY PERSONNEL - All cities
INTEREST CODE FOESIG ctEC
ofinterestcodes designating
required to adopt
certain positions participating in making decisions which may
affect financial inter9sta�endmentsSince ahaveibeenon f necessarythe 'to
Code on October 3, 1989, positions.
add new positions or delete obsolete p
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive
testimony
and adopt Resolution No. 89-97H adding the position
of Community Relations Coordinator to the City's Conflict Of
Interest Code.
Requested by: City Clerk
8.2 GENERAL PLAN -
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Development Director
9. OLD BUSINESS:
9.1 TRACT NO. 47851 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT -
Recommended Action:
Requested by: City Engineer
OF TIME FOR
9.2 DISCUSSION RE: ORDER MEETINGS, BEGINNING
AND OTHER ISSUES RELATED TO
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
" UNCIL MEETINGS - Continued from June
THE CONDUCT OF CITY CO
21, 1994.
R uested by: City Council
LESS THAN A QUORUM
9. BROWN ACT - EFFECT UPON CITY COUNCIL, Council
Recommended Action: It is recommended mattenc�o City
modify the existing continuing that type of less
approach to issue analysis by eliminating
than a quorum committee; and replacinguorum of
less than a q
the Council issue analysis with a specific issue ad hoc
committee approach.
Friday: July 15, 1994
City of Diamond Bar Agenda For Page: 4
p,
Meeting g 1994
July 19,
PRIVATE QUORUM
ECT UPON C
- EFFECT COUNCIL, LESS THAN A
g.3 BROWN ACT
Requested by: City Manager
g DISCUSSION RE: CITY COUNCIL SUB COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Requested by: City Manager
9.5 DISCUSSYOR OF
ION RE: INVITATDELEGATIOION FRO14 NAFROM THE'CITYNOFCDIA14OND
VAL
PROVINCE, CHINA, FOR A
BAR TO ATTEND THE 'THIRD INTERNATIONAL FOLK ARTS FES
Recommended Action:
R quested by: Mayor Werner
placing City Council Members' from
g, DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES O
COUNCIL MEMBERS - To ban p Continued
on public works construction project signs.
June 21, 1994-
It is recommended that the City Council
mm
Recoended Action: public works
no longer place names of Council Members on
construction project signs.
M
Requested by: MPT/Harmony
CITY ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR
RtDI DIRECTION
N
Verbal presentation by YAttorney.
21, 1994.
Requested by: City Attorney.
AMICUS CURIAE MATTERS -
continued from June
10. NEW BUSINESS:
COMMUNITY
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGONAL PARKIN
GscheduAT led meetingsITAGE ° ub
CENTER - During their regularly
Tuesdays, members of the Diamond
Rd ar Srnthe Heritage sPark
park diagonally on Brea Canyonon Rd for parking
Community Center. They utilize Brea Cany
Center is inadequate to accommodate
at the
because Parking the Traffic & Transportation
all the members. Therefore, diagonal parking on
Commission recommended installation
of
andthat said
Brea Canyon Rd. as soon as p art of the Brea Canyon Road
installation be luded as P
Improvement Project.
Traffic & Transportation recommends that
Recommended Action: diagonal parking on
the City Council approve installation of CanyonRoad
Brea Canyon Rd. and include theBrea
recommends denial.
Improvements Project. However,
Requested by: City Engineer
City of Diamond Bar Friday: July 15, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 5
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
10.2 REQUEST FOR PARKING ALONG SOUTHBOUND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD,
BETWEEN ACACIA HILL ROAD AND MORNING CANYON ROAD - St. Denis
Catholic Church, at 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., is requesting
permission from the City to park along southbound Diamond Bar
Blvd. between Acacia Hill Rd. and Morning Canyon Rd. on
Sundays. Staff presented this item to the Traffic &
Transportation Commission and recommended that St. Denis
Catholic Church not be permitted to park along Diamond Bar
Blvd. on a regular basis (i.e. every Sunday). However, with
the St. Denis' expressed need, the Commission is
recommending that St. Denis' request to park on Sundays be
granted for two years.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
deny St. Denis Catholic Church's request for on -street
parking for every Sunday along southbound Diamond Bar Blvd.
between Acacia Hill Rd. and Morning Canyon Rd. The Traffic &
Transportation Commission recommends approval of the
on -street paking for a two-year period.
Requested by: City Engineer
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
12. CLOSED SESSION: MAY CONVENE TO CONSIDER: MATTERS OF
pending litigation (G.C. 54956.9), Personnel (G.C. 54957.6), or
purchase/sale of real property (G.C. 54956.8). Records not
available for public inspection.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
D -0 -APT
City of Diamond Bar Thursday: July 14, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 1
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR WERNER
ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS ANSARI, PAPEN, MILLER,
Mayor Pro Tem Harmony and Mayor Werner
2. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION.OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND
ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 INCLUDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS, SPECIAL
FUNDS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR
ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET
FORTH - Submitted for Council review and approval is the proposed
FY 1994-95 Annual budget and its accompanying resolution.
Continued from July 5, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 94 -XX approving and adopting a budget for FY
94-95.
Requested by: City Manager
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES,
None
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
5. COUNCIL COMMENTS:
6. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
6.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 20, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Eddie Reed - Swing Band - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden
springs Rd.
6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 25, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.3 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 27, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Cody Bryant Band - Country Western/Blue Grass - Sycamore
Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Rd.
6.4 COL TECH COMMISSION - JULY 27, 1994- 7:00 P.M., CITY HALL,
21660 E. Copley Dr.
6.5 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - JULY 28 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
6.6 MULTI -CULTURAL - AUGUST 1, 1994 - 7:00 P.M., AQMD ROOM
CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
City of Diamond Bar Thursday: July 14, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 2
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
6.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
7.1 ROVAL OF MINUTES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING -0F JUNE 71994 -
A rove as s 'tted.
Re ei ed b Cit c
7.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.2.1 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 23, 1994 - RECEIVE AND FILE
7.2.2 REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.3.1 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.3.2 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 12, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: City Engineer
7.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.4.1 REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.4.2 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 28, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7.4.3 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 26, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.5 VOUCHER REGISTER - APPROVE VOUCHER REGISTER DATED JULY 19, 1994
in the amount of $458,954.90.
Requested by: City Manager
7.6 RATIFICATION OF CONTRACT AMOUNTS:
7.6.1 LIZ MEYERS -
Recommended Action:
Requested by:
7.6.2 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY BOYS CLUB
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.6.3 GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS
City of Diamond Bar Thursday: July 14, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 3
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
7.6.3 GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.6.4 ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Services Director
7.6.5 MICHAEL BRANDMAN
Vl� Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Development Director
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-97H: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL - All cities are
required to adopt conflict of interest codes designating
certain positions participating in making decisions which may
affect financial interests. Since adoption of the City's
Code on October 3, 1989, amendments have been necessary to
add new positions or delete obsolete positions.
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive
testimony and adopt Resolution No. 89-97H adding the position
of Community Relations Coordinator to the City's Conflict of
Interest Code.
Requested by: City Clerk
8.2 GENERAL PLAN -
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Development Director
9. OLD BUSINESS:
9.1 TRACT NO. 47851 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT -
Recommended Action:
Requested by: City Engineer
9.10 DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS - To ban placing City Council Members' names
on public works construction project signs. Continued from
June 21, 1994.
I , "
City of Diamond Bar
Meeting Agenda
PRIVATE July 3.9,
9.70 DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC
Recommended Action:
U _ '-' �Tu sday: July 14, 1994
For
1994
IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES OF
It is recommended that the City Council
no longer place names of Council Members on public works
construction project signs.
Requested by: MPT/Harmony
9.2 DISCUSSION RE: ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS, BEGINNING TIME FOR
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, AND OTHER ISSUES RELATED TO
THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - Continued from June
21, 1994.
Requested by: City Council
9.3 BROWN ACT - EFFECT UPON CITY COUNCIL, LESS THAN A QUORUM
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
modify the existing continuing subject matter committee
approach to issue analysis by eliminating that type of less
than a quorum committee; and replacing less than a quorum of
the Council issue analysis with a specific issue ad hoc
committee approach.
Requested by: City Manager
9.4 DISCUSSION RE: CITY COUNCIL SUB COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Requested by: City Manager
9.7 CITY ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR DIRECTION ON AMICUS CURIAE MATTERS -
Verbal presentation by City Attorney. Continued from June
21, 1994.
Requested by: City Attorney.
10. NEW BUSINESS:
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGONAL PARKING AT HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER - During their regularly scheduled meetings on
Tuesdays, members of the Diamond Bar Senior Citizen's Club
park diagonally on Brea Canyon Rd. near the Heritage Park
Community Center. They utilize Brea Canyon Rd for parking
because parking at the Center is inadequate to accommodate
all the members. Therefore, the Traffic & Transportation
Commission recommended installation of diagonal parking on
Brea Canyon Rd. as soon as possible; and that said
installation be included as part of the Brea Canyon Road
Improvement Project.
Recommended Action: Traffic & Transportation recommends that
the City Council approve installation of diagonal parking on
Brea Canyon Rd. and include the Brea Canyon Road
Improvements Project. However, staff recommends denial.
City of Diamond Bar Thursday: July 14, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 5
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGONAL PARKING AT HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY
Requested by: City Engineer
10.2 REQUEST FOR PARKING ALONG SOUTHBOUND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD,
BETWEEN ACACIA HILL ROAD AND MORNING CANYON ROAD - St. Denis
Catholic Church, at 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., is requesting
permission from the City to park along southbound Diamond Bar
Blvd. between Acacia Hill Rd. and Morning Canyon Rd. on
Sundays. Staff presented this item to the Traffic &
Transportation Commission and recommended that St. Denis
Catholic Church not be permitted to park along Diamond Bar
Blvd. on a regular basis (i.e. every Sunday). However, with
the St. Denis' expressed need, the Commission is
recommending that St. Denis' request to park on Sundays be
granted for two years.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
deny St. Denis Catholic Church's request for on -street
parking for every Sunday along southbound Diamond Bar Blvd.
between Acacia Hill Rd. and Morning Canyon Rd. The Traffic &
Transportation Commission recommends approval of the
on -street paking for a two-year period.
Requested by: City Engineer
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
12. CLOSED SESSION: MAY CONVENE TO CONSIDER: MATTERS OF
pending litigation (G.C. 54956.9), Personnel (G.C. 54957.6), or
purchase/sale of real property (G.C. 54956.8). Records not
available for public inspection.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
City of Diamond Bar
Meeting Agenda For
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR WERNER
DRAFT
Wednesday: July 13, 1994
Page: 1
ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS ANSARI, PAPEN, MILLER,
Mayor Pro Tem Harmony and Mayor Werner
2. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND
ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 INCLUDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS, SPECIAL
FUNDS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR
ACCOUNTS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS, OBJECTS AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET
FORTH - Submitted for Council review and approval is the proposed
FY 1994-95 Annual budget and its accompanying resolution.
Continued from July 5, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 94 -XX approving and adopting a budget for FY
94-95.
Requested by: City Manager
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC. -
None
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
5. COUNCIL COMMENTS:
6. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
6.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 20, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Eddie Reed - Swing Band - Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden
Springs Rd.
6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 25, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
6.3 CONCERT IN THE PARK - JULY 27, 1994 - 6:30 - 8:00 P.M.,
Cody Bryant Band - Country Western/Blue Grass - Sycamore
Canyon Park, 22930 olden Springs Rd.
6.5f PARKS & RECREATION MMI SION LY 28 199 - 7:00 P.M.,
Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
(o (o �i Cc,��� - 1 i, n_ A-Aw+lb 12 s�lvC�
6 g-' CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 2, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
6:7 AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
7.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City of Diamond Bar
PRIVATE Meeting Agenda For Wednesday: July 13, 1994
July 19, 1994 Page: 2
7.1.1ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JUS 7f
Submitted. FOR JUNE 13, 1994 - APPROVE AS
7.1.2 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1994 - APpROVE
as Submitted.
7.1.3 REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE �21 1994 � - APPROVE AS SUBMITTED
7.1.4 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 2g,
Submitted 1994 - APPROVE AS
i
7.1.5 REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 5 1994
- APPROVE AS SUBMITTED
�� Requested by: City Clerk
/-2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 23, 1994 -
RECEIVE AND FILE
;'.-2.2 REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
• •3 EGU ING OF
7, 1994 - CEIVE & F
7 ,( Requested by: Community Development Director
�3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
7.3.1 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1994 - RECEIVE
7.3.2 REGULAR MEETING OF MAY & FILE
12, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: City Engineer
7 P
��5 & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
REG MEE NG OF A
28, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
7;- REGULAR MEETING OF
;- MAY 26, 1994 - RECEIVE & FILE
Requested by: Community Services Director
C7�.5DOUCHER REGIST
ER - APPROVE VOUCHER REGISTER DATED JULY 19, 1994
in the amount of $
Requested by: City Man ger ,
1 �z.��✓
.Z.
R
Directo4r`�
O.94-XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
City of Diamond Bar Wednesday: July 13, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 3
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
7.7 RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE.CITY COUNCIL
FOR TREE PLANTING ON MAJOR ARTERIALS IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Services Director
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 89-97H: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL - All cities are
required to adopt conflict of interest codes designating
certain positions participating in making decisions which may
affect financial interests. Since adoption of the City's
Code on October 3, 1989, amendments have been necessary to
add new positions or delete obsolete positions.
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive
testimony and adopt Resolution No. 89-97H adding the position
of Community Relations Coordinator to the City's Conflict of
Interest Code.
Requested by: City Clerk
8.2 GENERAL PLAN -
Recommended Action:
Requested by: Community Development Director
�wesed �a}�--CitY-manager
9. OLD BUSINESS:
9.1 TRACT MAP NO. 47851 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT -
Recommended Action:
Requested by:
9.2 DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS - To ban placing City Council Members' names
on public works construction project signs. Continued from
June 21, 1994.
City of Diamond Bar Wednesday: July 13, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 4
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
9.2 DISCUSSION RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SIGNS CARRYING NAMES OF
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
no longer place names of Council Members on public works
construction project signs.
Requested by: MPT/Harmony
9.3 USSION RE: COUNCIL SUB- S -
C , 1994.
It
a
c
ttee of the City Council
the-&itv council.
R Councilwoman Ansari
appoint
9.4 DISCUSSION RE: ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS, BEGINNING TIME FOR
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, AND OTHER ISSUES RELATED TO
THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - Continued from June
21, 1994.
Requested by: City Council
9.5 BROWN ACT - EFFECT UPON CITY COUNCIL, LESS THAN A QUORUM
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
modify the existing continuing subject matter committee
approach to issue analysis by eliminating that type of less
than a quorum committee; and replacing less than a quorum of
the Council issue analysis with a specific issue ad hoc
committee approach.
Requested by: City Manager
9.6 DISCUSSION RE: CITY COUNCIL SUB COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Requested by: City Manager
9.7 CITY ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR DIRECTION ON AMICUS CURIAE MATTERS -
Verbal presentation by City Attorney. Continued from June
21, 1994.
Requested by: City Attorney.
10. NEW BUSINESS:
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGONAL PARKING AT HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER - During their regularly scheduled meetingsIM6L on
Tuesdays, members of the Diamond Bar Senior Citizen's Club
park diagonally on Brea Canyon Rd. near the Heritage Park
Community Center. They utilize Brea Canyon Rd -for parking
because -bW!-parking qty at the Center -Go
Slift4et park *g-speees to accommodate all the
members. Therefore, the Traffic -ate Transportation
City of Diamond Bar Wednesday: July 13, 1994
Meeting Agenda For Page: 5
PRIVATE July 19, 1994
10.1 INSTALLATION OF DIAGOVAL PARKING AT HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY
Commission recommen - ±t-aPpr-we
installation of diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Rd. as soon
as possible. counctl apprOVIRS ttjLe j219ta44&t1on,
Wiese re^^ M. that said installation be included
as part of the Brea Canyon Road Improvement Project.
Recommended Action: fkr
o-recommend6f that the City Council
approve installation of diagonal parking on Brea Canyon Rd.
and 4jW inclVde " the Brea Canyon Road Improvement
Proj ect .
Requested by: City Engineer
10.2 REQUEST FOR PARKING ALONG SOUTHBOUND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD,
BETWEEN ACACIA HILL ROAD AND MORNING CANYON ROAD - St. Denis
Catholic Church, 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd., seeks
permission from the City to park along southbound Diamond Bar
Blvd.* be een Acacia Hill Rd. and Morning Canyon Rd. on
.
Sunday To maintain a consistent policy with other
e organizations regarding parking along major
arterials and to minimize potential impact to the bicycle
lane along Diamond Bar Blvd. on a regular basis (i.e. every
Sunday)'4 However, with the St. Denis' expressed need, the
omn recommends to the Council that St. Denis' request
to park on Sundays be.granted for two years.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council
deny St. Denis Catholic Church's request for on -street
parking for every Sunday along southbound Diamond Bar Blvd.
between Acacia ill Rd. and Morning Can S n Rd.>'�"�
r
Peq6ukes d by: City �ngineer
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
12. CLOSED SESSION: MAY CONVENE TO CONSIDER: MATTERS OF
pending litigation (G.C. 54956.9), Personnel (G.C. 54957.6), or
purchase/sale of real property (G.C. 54956.8). Records not
available for public inspection.
13. ADJOURNMENT: