HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/03/1994March 10, 1994
Page 7
X. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
.XI. ADJOURNMENT
seconded by VC/Istik and carried unanimously
Moved by C /Gravdahl,at 8:05 p • �►
to adjourn the meeting
Respectively,
s David G. Liu
David G. Liu
Secretary
Attest:
/S/ Tom Ortiz
Tom Ortiz
Chairman
c:\wQGOUiud*.Y\tt-44\tt-mar10.94
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Pro Tom Harmony and Council Member Ansari
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson/,`Accountinq Manager
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, May 3, 1994
DATE: April 26, 1994
Attached is the Voucher Register dated May 3, 1994. As requested,
the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the
Finance Committee's review and approval prior to its entry on the
Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated May
3 1994has
Paymentseen are audited
approved and is recommended for payment.
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
APPROVED BY:
i da G. Ma on
Accounting Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager
,
armony
Mayor Pro Tem
f
Eileen R. Ansari
Council Member
$460,178.94
001
General Fund
3,304.77
112
Prop A Transit Fund
163.72
118
Air Quality Imp Fund
3,303.21
125
CDBG Fund
4,204.39
138
LLAD #38 -Fund
6,960.13
139
LLAD 139 Fund
108.93
141
LLAD #41 Fund
947.90
227
Traffic Mit Fee Fund
10,717.13
250
CIP Fund
154.50
510
self Insurance Fund
$490,043.62
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
i da G. Ma on
Accounting Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager
,
armony
Mayor Pro Tem
f
Eileen R. Ansari
Council Member
*#� Ci
nk0i.TIME: 17:4404/26/94 VtQy UCoHf DiER RaEmGoInSd barTER
XF THRU.............05/03/94
PAGE
VOW NATE
VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE
_-------------------------------
INIVOICE
DESCRIPTION*
# PREPAID # #
-----------------------------------------------
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
ARA Services
ARAService
#001-4010-2-325
*001-4030-2325
1 405038
1 40503B
04/26 05/03 1567711041 Mtg-Sheriff Brkfst
304.45
04/26 05/0.3 1567711041 Mtg-Four Corners
224.62
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y
529.07
ARA/Cary Refreshment Svcs ARA
*001-4090-2130
*001-4090-2325
1 40503E
1 405038
04/26 05/03
325944
Equip Rent -May
31.00
04/26 05/03
226607
Meeting Supplies
118.70
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
149.70
kcurate Landscape
Accurate
*138-4538-2210
*139-4539-2210
1 405038
1 40503B
04/26 05/03
32401
Maint-Supplies Dist #38
286.09
+F001-4319-2210
1 405038
04/26 05/03
32402
Maint Supplies -Dist #39
66.46
*001-4313-2210
1 445038
04/26 05/03
32404
Maint Supplies -Peterson
297,22
#001-4316-2210
1 40503B
04/26 05/03
32475
Trash Cans-Hrtge Prk
500,00
*001-4325-2210
1 405938
04/26 05/03
32475
Trash Cans -Maple Hill
3pp,00
#001-4328-2210
1 405038
04/26 05/03
32475
Trash Cans-Starshine
50.00
*138-4538-5500
1 4M3B 12/1577
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
32475
Trash Cans-&mitridge
55,00
♦138-�-M
2 405038
04/26 05/03
32`2560
32560
April Maint-Dist #�
3,3,80
*134-4539-5500
1 405038
04/26 05/03
32561
Maint/Gopher Control -#38
350.00
*139-4539-5500
2 40503B 08/1576
04/26 05/03
32561
Gopher Control -#39
750, G0
*001-4311-5300
2 405038 26/1666
04/26 05/03
326;8
April
April Maint-Dist #34
April Maint-Paul Grow
5,920,22
*401-4313-5300
*}101-431h-5300
^ 405038 02/1666
.2 ,
4050-8 04/1666
04 /26 05/03
32638
April Maint-Heritage
1,100.00
750,00
}001-4319-5300
2 40503E 01/1666
04/26 05/03
32638
April Maint-Maple Hill
900.00*001-4322-5300
2 40503B 03/1666
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
32638
32638
April Maint-Peterson
1,200.00
,,A
`001-4328-5300
2 405038 05/1666
04/26 05/03
32638
April Maint-Reagan
Maint-Starshine
1,000.00
x)01-4331-5300
1 405038 07/1666
2 40503B 08/1666
04/26 05/03
326-38April
April
500,00
1,500.00
04/26 05/03
32638
April Maint-SummitredCyn
1,00.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y
20,513.79
Ilternate Energy Engineer A1tEnergy
01-4440-6310
1 40503B
04/26 05/03
121427A
Coop Supplies-MeterlOAmps
15.h9
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
15.69
oerican Storage LTD
AwStorag
)01-4090-2140
2 405038 01/1771
04/26 05/03
May Rent _-, Units -92,112C
153.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
153.00
wntrout, Phil
Araentrout
101-4440-4040
POI -4440-4040
1 40503C 01/1773
2 405030 01/1773
04/26 05/03
EmerCooNSvcs-4/9-4/23
673.00
04/26 05/03
CDBG-EmerSvcs-4/9-4/23
336.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,009.00
ioid*
ACty f Dmond Bar
UN TIME: 17:44 04J26/94 t? p U � H E R R E G I S T E R
DUE THRU.............0/.3J4
5 n' 9 PAGE
,
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
-ACCOUNT -------
PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE n * PREPAID
-----------------------------------------------------------------AMOUNT DATE
CHECK
-----------------------------------
Astro Jump
4001-4095-2353
Averback Company
+510-4810-7200
AstroJump
8 40503E
Averback
1 405038
B.Chamberlain Consulting BChamber
*01-4090-6230 1 405038
Best, Best L Krieger BestKriegr
*001-4020-4021 1 40503B
Boys Club/San Gabriel Vly BoysClub
*001-4555-5520 1 40503B
CELSOC
+001-4210-230
Adillac Blue
x001-4095-2353
:antrell, Mayra
ti01-3478
heng, Jennifer
?01-3478
CELSOC
1 40503B
CadBlue
9 40503E
1120
11 40503A
1123
6 40503A
04/16 05/0-1,
04/126 05/0::
04/26 05/0a 10211
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
64/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03 10263
04/26 05/03 106,55
BaunceHouse-5thAnnvCeleb
TOTAL PREPAID '!0WNT ---- }
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
B1nketBondRenwl-FY 94-95
TOTAL DUE VENOM --------
Comp Equip -Gen Network
TOTAL Dt1E VENDOR --------
Mar Legal Svcs -Prop Tar
TOTAL DILE VENDOR --------
March Graffiti Removal
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Bal Due -Plug Publication
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
Entertaimmnt-5thAnnvCeleb
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Recreation Refund
TOTAL RE VENDOR --------
Recreation Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
175.00 05/03/94 !i0Ut702155
175.00
0.00
154.50
154.50
128.28
128.28
38.91
38.91
715.00
715.00
31.26
31.26
200.00 05/03/94 0000021527
20.00
0.0
40.0
40.00
20.00
20.00
+�* Cit
AP TIME: 17:4404/26/94 VOy UCoHf DiER RaEmGoInSd TEBR ar
DUE THRU.............05/0.3/94
ANDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/CUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------------------------
M *Pone, Rap1h 1125
W- 1-3474 1 40503A
Ching, Martha 1129
-QYJ1-3478 7 405O3A
Computerland of D. B. Cmptrland
iQQI-4090-2205 1 40503C
atton/Beland Assoc CotBelAsso
WI -4210-4220 1 40503E
W Engineering D&JEngine
W11D)-5201 1 40503E
B. Chamber of Commerce DBChamber
*101-4010-2325 2 40"
)ataquick Dataquick
rOt11-42]0-2130 1 40503E
ftamond Bar Business Asoc OB&mA%m
WI -4090-2140 3 40503B
¢001-4090-2210 1 40503E
s001-4090-2210 2 40503B
Diana Cho & Associates DianaCho
*125-4215-2355 1 40503B
PAGE 3
+ PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
-----------------------------------
04/26 05/03
7229
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.00
04/26 05/0:3
10770
Recreation Refund
20,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
20.00
04/26 05/03
CLO3038004
1.44 Floppy Drive-EmerPrp
310.42
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
310.42
04/26 05/03
3402
Prof Svcs-GPAC 3/.8-:3/22
1,621.67
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,621.67
04/26 05/03
945-004
P1anChk Svcs-Priortol0/93
135.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
135.00
04/26 05/03
Instailtion Dinner-CCounc
160.00 05/03/94 0000021530
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
160.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
04/26 05/03
March Usage Chrgs
35.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
35.00
04/26 05/03
May Rent -Suite 190
5,707.80
04/26 05/03
May Comm AreaMaint-Ste1CK1
812.00
04/26 05/03
May Comm AreaMaint-Stel90
702.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
7,221.80
04/26 05/03
CIC Audit Review Svcs -Feb
200.00
TOTAL DIS VENDOR --------)
200.00
*** Cind Bar ***
RIAVTIhIE:17:4404/26/94 VtOy UCoHf DiamoER REGISTER
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
PAGE 4
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT-------PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE * * PREPAID
-- DESCRIPTION
------------------------------- AMOUNT DATE
------------------------
_ CHECK
Eastman Inc.
Eastman
*001-4040-1100
*001-4050-1100
2 405030 44/1791
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
0]21h29U1 S
Supplies-CClk
C%1 -4050-110t)
43/1791
2 405030 45/1191
0 2 3
4/76 0510.:
01'162921 Supplies -Fin
*001-4050-1100
� 40`10.'.0 46/1191
C1/mob 05/03
04/26 05/03
011162921 Supplies -Fin
01_!62921
#001-`�-1200
*001-42]0-110G
5 40503C 42/1791
04/26 05/03
Supplies -Fin
012162927 Supplies -Gen Govt
#001-4310-1100
1 405030 41/1791
1 405030 4 0/1791
04/26 05/03
012162934 Supplies -Ping
*001-4090-1,00
4 4V -03C 39/1791
04/26 05/03
05/03
012162936 supplies -Pok. & Rec
#001 -W,0 -j,^,0004/26
"1-4090-]200
3 405030 38/1791
04/26 05/03
012163518 Supplies -Gen Govt
012172519 supPlies-Gen Govt
#125-4215-1200
2 405030 36/1791
1 40503C 34/1791
04/26 05/03
012188506 Supplies -Cr Meat -Gen Govt
-401-4040-1100
1 405030 35/1791
04/26 05/03
012193139 PPIies-CDBG
*001-4090-1200
1 405030 33/1791
04/26 05/03
012193152
#00I-4510-1100
1 40503C 37/11791
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
012193161 Supplies -Gen
012195465 Supplies-Engr/FubWks
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
Entenmann-Rovin Co.
Entenmann
#001-4010-1200
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
138277 Badges/Cases-CCouncil
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
Escarcega, Isela
1131
*001-3478
9 40503A
04/26 05/03 10694
Recreation Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
sparza, Maria
113.5
H)01-3478
2 40503A
04/26 05/03 10723 Recreation Refund
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
:sposito, Lou
EspositaL
001-4553-4100
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
T&T Comm Mtg 4/14
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
W Federal Credit Union F&ACreditU
k01-2110-1012
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
Payroll Deductions-PP8
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
decal Express Corp,
FedEtpress
01-4090-2120
5-42ff 2120
1 405030
1 �`'0
04/26 05/03 520280707 Express Mail Svcs -Gen
04/26 05/03 520280707 Express Mail Svcs-CDBG
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
2.52
49.40
49.40-
49,44
270.00
43.40
9.66
44.90
294.02
208.66-
109.34
26.89
22.08
155.50
819.09
349.11
349.11
20.00
20.00
91.00
91.00
40.00
40.00
2,010.00 05/03/94 0000021529
2,010.00
0.00
13.00
9.00
22.00
�tf
C ity of Dia�uond gar ##�
PAGE 5
*;TIME:17:4404/26JQ4
VOUCHER REGISTER
DLL THRU.............005/03194
PREPAID #
„1DOR NAME VENDOR ID.
iiCCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENT --/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
- ---------------------
Tral Reserve Bank
FedReserve
04/26 05/03
Sv Bond Deduct-PP7/8
9
100.00
1-2110-1009
2 405030
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
100.()U
� rst Interstate Bank
FirstInter
04/26 05/03
Fuel-CMgr
23.15
*A.01-4030-2310
2 40503F
3 40503E
04/26 05/03
Fuel-CMgr
23.28
*001-4030-2310
�+t4w01-40'0-2310
4 4050:
04/26 05103
Fuel-CMgr
21.75
21.70
tot -4030-2310
5 40503E
04/26 05/03
Mt Ct Att 415
g r y
Mtg-CMgr/I%D-3/21
64.25
*001-4030-2325
4050
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03
Mtg-CMgr/CtyBrea-3/22
� , q;3
WI -4030-2325
3 40503E
4 40503E
04/26 05/03
Mtg-CMgr/LACO/CAO 3/24
32.83
atl1T1-400-2325
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
215.89
'rst Interstate Bank
Firstlnter
04/26 05/03
Mtg Harsny/Ansari-3/8
12.91
4001-4010-2325
3 40503F
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
12.91
r='J menbaus, Bruce
Flasenbaus
04/26 05/03
Ping Coro Mtgs 3/14,28
120.00
01-4210-4100
,401-4210-4100
1 40503E
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
120. 00
�1let Refinishing
F1eetRefin
04/26 05/03 12934
Painting of EOC Trailer
1,827.13
+1-4440-6100
1 40503C
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,827.13
7wog, Franklin
FongF
5 40503E
04/26 05/0?
Ping cmMtgs 3/14,28
120.00
<�41-4210-4100
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
120.00
F:rwxhise Tax Board
FranchiseT
04/26 05103
WithholdOrder-351364088
163.44
*01-2110-1009
1 405030
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
163.44
z1v G Trophy Co.
Wrophy
1 405030 06/1654
04/26 05/03
Trophies -Youth Sports
105.06
' 01-4350-1200
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
105.06
Ci+y 0f Diamond
Bar
'UN TIME: 17:44
04/26/94
V O U C H E R R E
G I S T E R
PAGE 6
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
ENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NC.
----------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE. INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOLNT DATE CHECK
TE California
GTE
001-4090-2125
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
Phne Svcs -Bldg & Safety
183.05
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------!
183.05
TE California
GTE
001-4313-2125
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
Phne Svcs-Hrtge Prk
62.48
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----- 7--)
62.48
TE California
GTE
?01-4313-2125
2 405030
04/26 05/03
Phne Svcs-Hrtge Prk
53.07
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
53.07
TE California
GTE
118-4098-2125
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
Phne Svcs-CityOnLine
163.72
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
163.72
TE California
GTE
))1-4331-2125
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
Phne Svcs-Syc Cyn Prk
53.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
53.06
-affiti Control
Systems GrafitiCon
?01-4555-5520
3 40503C 01/1781
04/26 05/03 db0394
March Graffiti Removal
1,563.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,563.00
•ies, Geraldine
44
)01-3472
4 40503A
04/26 05/03
Recreaton Refund
30.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
30.00
inderliter De Llamas Hinderlitr
)01-4090-4010
1 40503C
04/26 05/03
Prof Svcs -1st Qtr 1994
90.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
90.0
)me Depot
HowDepot
101-4440-1200
1 40503C 05/1795
04/26 05/03
Trailer Supplies -Em rPrp
46.92
)01-4440-1200
2 405030 06/1795
04/26 05/03
Trailer Supplies-EmerPrp
45.32
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
92.24
+ff City of Diamond Bar �*f
Mi TIME: 17:44 04/26/94 VOUCHER REGISTER
DUE THRU.............05/!?3/94
PAGE 7
* * PREPAID
LOOM NAME VENDOR ID, AMww DATE CHECK
PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTR9/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION --------------------
4CC----------- --
, Lydia
113056.00
8 405033
04%26 05/03 18743
Recreation Refund
t I.3478
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
56.00
IIIA Retireeent Trust -457 ICMA
04/26 05/03
May -Payroll Contrib
300-00
400.001
+1-2110-1007
1-4030-0080
1 40503D
405031)
04/26 05/03
May-CMgr Contract Contrite
May-CMgr Cafe Contrib
1,018.77
#0(q-4030-(YM1
40503D
04/26 05/03
04/2b 05/03
May-CCIk Cafe Contrib
433.09 161.34
W1-4040-0090
1 40543 1)
04/26 05/03
May -Fin Cafe Contrib
534.74
+�01-4050-0090
1 40503D
04126 05103
May -Ping Cafe Contrib
283.57
"01-4210-0090
1 405031)
04/26 05/03
May -P&M Cafe Contrib
230,00
�aa;11-4316-0090
1 3d
04/26 65/03
May -Coe Svc Cafe Contrite
1,459.66
1-4350-0090
1 405031)
04126 05/03
En Ma r Cafe Contrib
Y' 9
*C01-4510-0090
1 0503D
4,821.17
TOTAL DUE VENOM -"'-----}
jpaav IV Systems Inc. Image4Sys
1-4090-2100 1 405031)
I-4090-2200 2 40503D
Igpessive Screenaork:s Impressive
asa3?-4350-1200 2 40503D 02/1726
el►af National Steel InNatSteel
2 40503D 01/1819
aKv,1-4555-5502
na;and Valley Dl.y Bullein IVOB
pWI-4040-2115
K01-4040-2115 2 405030
It ik, Jack:
1stikJ
3 40503F
04/26 05103
04/26 05/03 14334
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03 6223
04/26 05/03 dc83358
04/26 05/03 dc83827
04/26 05/03
j 4 jigns JHSigns a
,4«;,1.-4095_2353 1 40`_:0'.1) 04/2b 05/43 4:413
March -Konica Copy Charges
March -Konica Copier Maint
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
Screenwork Svcs-Recreatn
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
Rd Maint-CatchBasins
TOTAL. DUE VENDOR --------}
Pub Hrg-Bids-HandicpAcces
Pub Hrg-VTT Map 51407
TOTAL DUE VENOM --------)
T&T Coo Mtg 4/14
TOTAL ME VENDOR --------
Banners-CtyCelebration
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
9.30
108.00
117.30
246.21
246.21
1,461.00
1,461.00
45.00
97.50
142.50
40.00
40.00
779.40
779.40
+�* Citof Diamon���
RUN TIME: 17:44 04/26/94 V O y U C H E R R E G I S d T E Far R PAGE 8
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
VENDOR WE VENDOR ID. * � PREPAID 4 �
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jade Mountain
JadeMount
4001-4440-1200
4 405OX 01/1825
04/26 05/03
4755
DualBatteryCharger-EDC
$7.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
37.50
John Alden G.T.
JohnAlden
4001-4010-0090
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
MayCafeMillrRetroPymt1/94
542.00
TOTAL DIS VENDOR --------)
542.00
Jordan, Joey
1123
4001-3478
14 40503A
04/26 05/03
10108
Recreation Refund
31.00
TOTAL DIN= VENDOR --------)
.31.00
Jordan, Sharon
45
*001-3472
1 4050'33A
04/26 05/03
Recreation Refund
15.00
TOTAL DIN: VENDOR --------)
15.00
Judicial Data Systems
JudData5ys
*001-4411-540.5
1 405031)
04/26 05/03
March Prkg Citations
210.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
210.60
K & V Blueprint Service K&VBluePrt
*001-4210-2100
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
11804
Maint-BluPrtMach-Pings
121.24
*001-4510-1200
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
11804
Maint-B1uPrtMach-PubWks
121.24
X001-4090-2200
1 40503B
04/26 05/03
438841
April Xerox Mach Maint
285.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
527.48
amath, Bernadette
1066
x001-3478
18 40503A
04/26 05/03
10238
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL M VENDOR --------)
40.00
Cavanaugh, Jody
1122
Keil -3473
13 40503A
04/26 05/03
10068
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
40.00
-.A. County -Sheriff's
Dep LACSheriff
4+)1-4411-5401
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
22152
March Contract Svcs
305,326.94
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
305,326.94
f�f Cit*�*
AW TIME: 17:44 04/26/94 V O y UCof Diamond Bar H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
WWOR NAME VENDOR ID.
xnUVT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/ND. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION ¢ { PREPAID
______________________ AMOUNT DATE CHECK.
----------------------------------------------------------------
L.A. County -Sheriff's Dep LACSheriff
*MI -4414-5401
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
22108 SpecEvnt-CalvChap3/27-30
1,196.47
TOTAL DUE VcNDOR --------)
1,198.47
i..A.County Public Works LACPubWk
4112-4-5529
001-4555-5503
1 40503D
L 40503D
04/26 05/03
59400002430 Oct -Dec Paratranst Svcs
3,304.77
001-4555-5503
2 40503D
04/26 05/03
94000008981 Curb/Gutter Maint-FY93-94
322.58
#41-4555-5503
3 40503D
04/26 05/03
94000008962 Prkway Maint-FY93-94
1,999.35
*41-4555-5503
4 40503D
04/26 05/03
94000009777 Prkway Maint-FY93-94
4,474.10
X1-4555-5507
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
94000009778 Sidewalk Maint-FY93-94
412.38
04/26 05/03
94010000380 March Traffic Signl Maint
1,223.27
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
11,736.45
LJ%cque Better Roofs
LaRocque
OMI -3450
1 405030
04/26 05/03
Refund-Overpymnt Permit
5.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
5.00
L.Atham, Tricia
1126
1-3478
16 40503A
04/26 05/03
10266 Recreation Refund
58,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
58.00
-#ague of Ca. Cities
League
01-4010-2325
4 40503E
04/26 05/03
Mtg 5/5-Wrnr,Ansri,Hrmy
60.Q0
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
60.00
-eighton and Associates Leighton
�Mt-2300-1012
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
82065 Geotech Svcs-EN94-046
993.70
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
993.70
ewis Engraving Inc.
LewisEWa
DM -4095-2110
1 405030
04/26 05/03
015491 Tile Engrav-194 Cook
21,27
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
21.27
m^enz, Mark
1137
.41-3478
4 4050A
04/26 05/03
10712 Recreation Refund
40,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.00
PMS
MPress
101-4440-2110
2 40503D 01/1836
04/26 05/03 11764 PrtgSvcs-EmerPrep/Erthgke
2,159.31
TOTAL E(E VENDOR --------)
2,159.31
Citof �*�
RUN TIME: 17:44 04/26/94 V O y U C H E R Diamond Bar R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. 4 * PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meyer, David
My rD
x+)01-4210-41(=)
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
Ping Comm Mtgs 3/14,28
120.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
120.00
liniskey, Dorothy
1067
FOOI-3478
17 40503A
04/26 05/03
10380
Recreation Refund
22,50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
22.50
linute Man Press
MinuteMan
•001-43350-2110
2 40503D 01/1828
04126 05/03
9026
Flyers-5thAnnvCeleb
227.33
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
227.33
itchell Pest Control Inc MitchellPe
001-4555-5509
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
00014941
Prof Svcs -Tree Inspection
70.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1
70.00
3bil
Mobil
?01-4310-2310
5 40503D
04/26 05/03
k0196232
Fuel-Prk & Rec
31.60
)01-4310-2310
4 40503D
04/26 05/03
kO892150
Fuel-Prk & Rec
18,50
u)1-4210-2'310
1 405030
04/26 05/03
kO892614
Fuel -Ping
21.84
x31-4090-2310
2 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2994622
Fuel -Gen Govt
16.00
301-4310-2310
2 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2994961
Fuel-Prk & Rec
19,54
)01-4310-2310
1 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2994972
Fuel-Prk & Rec
24.02
KF1-4210-2310
2 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2995285
Fuel -Ping
20,20
101-4090-2310
l 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2995451
Fuel -Gen Govt
12.00
POI -4310-2310
6 40503D
04/26 05103
k299%24
Fuel-Prk & Rec
34.30
01-4310-2310
3 40503D
04/26 05/03
k2995694
Fuel-Prk & Rec
32,89
TOTAL ICE VENDOR --------)
230.85
bil
Mobil
01-4310-2200
2 40503D 01/1839
04/26 05/03
K W-. 5064
Tires-P&M Truck
429.65
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
429.65
5ile Traffic Zone
MobTrfZone
)1-4411-2200
2 40503D 01/1830
04/26 05/03
1434
RadarEgUpMaint-Sheriffs
32.49
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
32.49
Vn, Mike
1124
)1-3474
2 40503A
04/26 05/0:3
9834
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.00
*** City of Diamond Bar ***
AMi-TIME: 17:4404/26!94 V 0 U C H E R REGISTER
DUE Th"J.............05/03/94
PAGE 11
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID * *
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-ND BATCH PO.LINE/ND. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myers, Elizabeth
*001-4040-4000
*001-4210-4000
*001-4210-4000
*001-4210-4000
*041-4210-4000
*001-4210-4220
*041-4210-4220
*001-4553-4000
MyersE
1 40503D 14/1787
1 40503D 10/1787
2 40503D 13/1787
3 40503D 16/1787
4 40503D 17/1787
2 405030 12/1787
3 405030 15/1787
1 40503D 11/1787
National Sanitary Supply Nat5anitar
*001-4313-2210 3 40503D 02/1817
*001-4313-2210 2 W503D 01/1817
Nelson, Trent
*001-4095-2353
Northland Rental
*001-4095-2353
NelsonT
7 40503F
NorthRent
6 40503E
)CB Reprographics OCBReprogr
f250-4310-6415 06594 1 405030 29/1637
Ortiz, Too
W01-4553-4100
Payroll Transfer
*001-1020
OrtizTon
140503E
PayrollTr
1 40503A
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 94008
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 94db08
04/26 05/03 94dbO8
04/26 05/03 9729313
04/26 05/03 9732774
MntSec-CCouncl Mtg 4/5
460.00
MntSecADR 3/28,29&4/5
69.00
MntSec-Ping C.;mm 4/11
391.00
MntSec-Ping Como 3/28
161.00
MntSec-SEATAC Mtg 4/15
184.00
MntSec-GPAC 4/12
161.00
MntSec-GPAC Mtg 3/22
345.00
SecrtrySvcs-Trf&Trns
23.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------1 1,794.00
Janitoral Suppl-HrtgPrk
danitoral Suppl-HrtgPrk
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
04/26 05/03 Sound Equip-5thAnnvCeleb
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
04/26 05/03
04/26 05/03 787663
04/26 05/03
Equip Rent-5thAnnvCeleb
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
Pantera Prk-Graphic Svcs]
TOTAL 141E VENDOR --------
T&T Como Mtg 4/14
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
187.43
25.66
213.09
414.00 05/03/94 0000021524
414.00
0.00
100.09 05/03/94 0000021528
100.09
0.00
29.63
29.63
40.00
40.00
04/26 05/03 Payroll Transfer PP#8 56,700.00 05/03/94 0000000008
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----) 56,700.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 0.00
f*� Citof Di��
RUN TIME: 174404/26/94 VOy U C H E R RaEmGoInSd TEBa t
R PAGE 12
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pearse, Leona 42
*001-:3472 3 4003A
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp. PBCC
*001-4090-2130 3 40503E
*001-4090-2130 2 40503E
Plunk, Lydia E. P1unkL
+001-4210-4100 3 4050.3E
Pomona Judicial District Po"dDist
OG1-3223 1 40503E
Preferred Detailing Pref Detail
*001-4310-2200 3 40503E
'remiere Leasing Co. PremiereLe
X001-4350-2140 2 40503E 01/1722
'ublic Empl Retirement PERS
-001-2110-11108 1 40503E
001-2110-1008 2 40503E
JM Design RJMDesign
250-4310-6415 06594 2 40503E 01/1628
escue Industries Rescueind
X)1-2100-1012 2 40503E
04/26 05/03
Recreation Refund
15.00
TOTAL DUE VENDdR--------)
15.00
04/2b 05/03
1444744MR`;`4
RentFlder/Stuffr4/10-5/10
199.18
04/26 05/03
1444744mr94
PostMachRent-4/10-7/10
335.58
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
5.34.76
04.126 05/0:3
Ping Comm Mtgs :3/14,28
120.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
120.00
04/26 05/03
Mar-Prk:g Violations
455,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
455.00
04/26 05/03
9804
Detail 5vcs-City Truck
30,(X)
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
30.00
04/26 05/03
2179
Lease-PrtbleBldg-Syc-May
389.70
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
389.70
04/26 05/03
PPS Retire Contrib-ER
3,492.84
04/26 05/03
PP8 Retire Contrib-EE
3,858.56
TOTAL 14JE VENDOR --------)
7,:351.40
04/26 05/03
101337
ProfSvcs-Pantera Prk
10,687.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
10,687.50
04/26 05/03
Refund-SdwlkDep-EN94-041
200.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
200.00
*** Citof Diar ***
RW TIME. y mond Ba
17'144 04/26/94 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 13
DUE TFRU.............05/03/94
NAME VENDOR ID. * *PREPAID
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-ND BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTIONANUT DATE CHECK
tT-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alert Driver Ins Co. RobDrive
1.001-4810-7200 1 40503E 04/26 05/03 Addl Volunteer Ins Progrm 263.00
1.001-4810-7200 2 40503E 04/26 05/03 Volunteer Ins Premium 300.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------ 563.00
kibert Driver Ins Co.
RobDrive
.*1-2300-1004
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Spec Event Ins -April
115.00
!001-4090-2395
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Ins Expense-SpecEventAprl
15.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
130.00
wKranzer&Assoc C.E.
Inc RKA
001-4555-5227
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
2293
April Engr Inspections
1,582.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
1,582.50
titan & Tucker
RutanTuckr
]01-4020-4021
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
Mar Legal Svcs -DBA vs Cty
13,559.62
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
13,559.62
tel. Bob
SabolB
)01-2300-1002
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Refund Dep-HrtgPrkConCtr
200.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
200.00
In Gabriel Vly Tribune SGVTribune
101-4040-2115
4 40503E
04/26 05/03
sgvt34521
Sealed Bids-HandcpAccess
60.16
41-4040-2115
3 40503F
04/26 05/03
sgvt5101
Pub Hrg-SthPteMstrPlan
117.76
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
177.92
had, Don
SchadD
01-4210-4100 .
4 40503E
04/26 05/03
Ping Cary Mtgs 3/14,28
120.00
TOTAL -DUE VENDOR --------)
120.00
Kke, Warren C.
Sieckew
?1-4553-5222
2 40503E
04/26 05/(Y3
3175-S
CrssWalk Analysis-Prof5vc
389.00
)1-4553-5222
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
3176-13
Cty Wide Speed Zone Survy
305.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
694.00
` Speedy
SirSpeedy
41-4350-2110
3 40503F 13/1766
04/26 05/03
15449
BusCards-CSCoord-P&RComm
81.93
11-4553-2110
1 40503F 14/1766
04/26 05/03
15607
BusCards-T&T Commsnrs
82.18
11-4090-2110
1 40503F 15/1766
04/26 05/03
15645
City Letterhead
74.63
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
238.74
RUNTIME: 17:4404/26/94
+++ City c Diae0nd Bar +++
VOUCHER
REGISTER
OLE THRU.............05/03/94
PAGE 14
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-N0
BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENTRY/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION+
+ PREPAID + +
---------------------------------------------------------
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Southern Ca. Edison
WaEdison
+001-4311-2126
x001-4316-2126
1 40503F
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Elect Svcs -Paul Grow Prk
^g,.
_ 55
+001-4319-2126
1 40503E -
04/26 09/03
Elect Svcs -Maple Hill Prk
219,'4
+001-4328-2126
1 40503E
��,,,�
,_6 05/03
Elect Svcs -Peterson Prk
90,76
+001-4331-2126
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Elect Svcs-Suafotrdge
280,25
04/26 05/03
Elect Svcs -Sycamore Cyn
275.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
895.46
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+141-4541-2126
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
Elect Svcs -Dist #41
109,9;
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------!
108.93
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
F138-4538-2126
140503F
04/26 05/03
Elect Svcs -Dist #38
179,50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
179.50
southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
139-4539-2126
1 40503F
04/26 0.5/03
Elect Svcs -Dist N39
223.45
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
223.45
outhern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
?01-4555-2126
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
Trffc Control Svcs
3,092.01
TOTAL OLE VENDOR --------)
3,092.01
iuthern California
SCPC
)01-4210-2315
1 4050:3E
04/26 05/03
94-95 MembrCves-Destefano
50.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
50.00
ectacular Affairs
Spectacula
25-4215-1200
3 40503E 01/1812
04/26 05/03 4067
Suppl-Linens-Eastrt_unchen
53.31
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------!
53.31
art Pins
SportPins
'1-4495-2353
5 40503E 01/1816
04%26 05/03 00020619
5th Annv Pins
958.98
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
958.98
ick, Donald
1138
)1-3478
5 40503A
04/26 05/03 10132
Recreation Refund
40,00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.00
* * * City of Diamond Bar ***
RtIN TIPS: 17:44 04/26/94 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 15
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
VEW NAME VENDOR ID. * * PREPAID *
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LIUEMO. ENTRY/DLE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Insurance of Ore StandardIn
*001-2110-1005
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
May Life Ins Prems
362.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
362.50
Standard Insurance of
Ore StandardIn
*001-2110-1005
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
May Suppl Life Ins Prems
18.00
TOTAL DLE VENDOR --------)
18.00
State Compensation Ins Fd StateComp
*001-2110-1011
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
WkCompinsPrem-1/1-3/31/94
2,724.35
*001-2110-1011
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
WkCompinsPrem-1/1-3/31/94
2,861.53
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
5,585.88
State of California
EDD
*001-4090-0080
1 445030
04/26 05/03
Unemplymnt Ins -April
30.84
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
30.84
Time Out Personnel Svc. TimeOut
*001-4040-4000
2 40503E
04/26 05/03
931179
Temp Svcs -Receptionist
109.76
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
109.76
U.S. Toys 6 Construction USToys
*001-4095-2353
3 40503D 01/1822
04/26 05/03
388167
Supplies-5thAnnvCeleb
82.37
TOTAL DUE VEIDOR--------}
82.37
S Sprint
USSprint
001-4510-2125
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
Engr Long Dist Phne Svcs
39.75
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- }
39.75
Unocal
Unocal
*001-4030-2310
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
513766
Fuel-CMgr
23.12
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
23.12
alalia, Rajnit
1127
6001-3478
15 40503A
04/26 05/03
10795
Recreation Refund
33.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
33.00
JN TIME: 17:44 04/26/94 City oV O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 16
DUE THRU.............05/03/94
_NOOK NAME VENDOR ID. # PREPAID ¢
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO- ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aln.;t Fire Protection Co WalnutFire
t.i'1- 44a'-12.
0 o,s
6 4'S03F 01/1,,::.
/�_ �..,iy'�
Oa "6 5/0,
FireEftgshrAnnual3,•c
204.47
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
204.47
!alnut Vly Water Dist
WVWater-Dis
2227-4510-64122 06104
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
ReclaimWaterSvcs-G15prgs
947.90
TOTAL DUE VENOM -------->
947.90
lalsh, Mary Jo
-001-3472
43
2 40503A
04/26 05/03
Recreation Refund
30.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
30.00
Natanabe, Janet
1001-3478
1132
10 40503A
04/26 05/03 10747
Recreation Refund
45.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
45.00
Test Publishing Co.
*001-4090-2320
WestPub
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
CA Legal Svcs-Publicatns
115.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
115.00
Workman, Lindy
*001-3476
41
1 40503A
04/26 05/03
Recreation Refund
67.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
67.50
Wold Title Co
^x:01-4210-4000
WorldTitle
5 40503E
04/26 '.5/03
TitieRprt-PrspectAcquistn
700.00
+�.g1i-4551-5221
1 40503E
04/26 05/03
TitieRprt-Prspectkquistn
745.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,445.00
Wright, Paul
+001-4090-4000
WrightP
1 40503F
04/26 05/0?
Audio/VisualSvc5-CC4 19
210.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
210.00
Wyndam Palm Springs
'x001-4010-2'330
Wyndham
1 40503F
04/26 05/03
CCCA Cnnf 5/19-22 Ar,sari
39^0.88
TOTAL DUE ;'ENDOR--------?
3'�8•°�'
C i t y o f
D i anon d Bar *�+�
PAGE 17
it1iE'TIf4::17:4404/26/94
VOUCHER
REGISTER
DUE T}ftU.............05/03/94
} PREPAID t ¢
VENDOR NAME
ACCOL T PROJ.TX-NO
---------------------------------------------------------
VENDOR ID.
BATCH PO.LINEIrO.
ENTRY/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION ---------------------------
ANDIN�IT DATE CHECK
--------------------
YMCA
+125-4215-2355
YMCA
3 4050.#
04/26 05/03
Reio� March Childcare Prg
1,769.00
TOTAL DUE 'MM --------)
1,769.00
YWCA
.125-4215-2355
YWCA
' 40503F
04/26 05/03
Reinb-TewPgrn-Feb/March
1,162.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------- )
1,162.56
Yen, Gina
X001-3478
1136
3 40503A
04/26 05/03
10236
Recreation Refund
51.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------->
51.00
Tosenite Waters
tWI-4310-2130
Yates
2 40503F 01/1620
04/26 05/03
Mar550270
EquipRent-WaterDisp-Mar
12.00
TOTAL DIN= VENDOR -------- )
12.00
)rug May
1121
12 40503A
04/26 05/03
10662
Recreation Refund
40.00.K101-3478
TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------- )
40.00
Zollerbach
�tJ1-4050-1200
Zellerbach
2 40503E 02/1835
04/26 05/03
113724911s
Computer Paper
68.72
555.32*01-4090-1200
7 40503F 01/1835
04/26 05103
113724911s
Copy Paper
TOTAL DUE VENOM-------->
624.04
a, Jennifer
01-3478
113:3
1 40503A
04/26 05/03
10760
Recreation Refund
32.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------)
32.00
TOTAL PREPAID-----------)
59,759.09
TOTAL DIN` ---------------)
430,284.53
TOTAL REPORT ------------)
490,043.62
RUNTIME: 17:4404/c6/94 , C i VOUC
t Y oHER f Di amond Bar x*4
REGISTEk
FUND SUMMARY REPORT PAGE
DUE TFRU.............05103/94
FUND
DISBURSE G/L GJE WILL POST
------TOTAL DIRECT PAY REVENUE EXPENSE GJE HAS POSTED FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
--------------------- REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE
------------------------------------------------
00i General Fund
138 LLAD #38 Fund
139 LLAD #39 Fund
510 Self Insurance F
125 CDBG Fund
112 Air Quality Igg
11 Prop A -Transit F
250 C.I.P. Fund
141 LLAD #41 Fund
227 Traffic Mit Fee
TOTAL
ALL FUNDS
460,178.94 74,099.92
4,204.-;9
6,960.13
154.50
3,303.21
163.72
3,304.77
10,717.1'
108.93
947.90
1,417.00 3x4,662.02
4,204.:)
6,960.13
154.50
3,303.21
163.72
3,304.77
10,717.13
108. KI
947.90
-------- ------------
490,043.62 74,099.92 ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
1,417.00 414,526.70
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO U.
' . �j�
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994 �
FROM: Linda G. Magnusone;'Accounting Manager
REPORT DATE: April 26, 1994
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - March 31, 1994
SUMMARY;
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement fo
the month of March 1994.
r
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
X Staff Report
___. Resolution (s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
_ Public Hearing Notification
— Bid Spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments;
REVIEWED BY;
Terrence L. Belan Frank M. Ushe
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Yes No
Yes --A No
Yes --X No
Yes X No
41nd4- fi
Linda G. a uson
Accounting anager
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - March 31, 1994
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance department presents the monthly Treasurer's
Statement for the City Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the March, 1994 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement
for the month of March 1994. This statement shows the cash balances for
the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances and
investment account balances.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
CIN OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
March 31, 1994
$ 1 6
0 0 8 7 4. 17
1 1 8 6. 3 0 5 4 ,
.. ..
$5,143,223.92 $875.5 4 0. 4
7 , 7 4 8
� 6 .2
131,1 8 )
0 0 )
2,465,065.25
GENERAL FUND
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
23,960.54 7,225.68
2 417,734.04 238,390.45
1,431.92 (189,627.32)
23,877.76
786,967.15
1,226 ' 082.91
GAS TAX FUND
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
48953.00
760,891.91 40,630.00
1,185" 452.91
6,749.57
37,102.12
48,943.40
TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD37,306.84
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
6,544.85
13,833,10
44,088.53182,133.04
8,978.23
0.00
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
PARK GRANT FUND
0.00
192 233.04
(10,100.00)
(5,717.59)
(12 443.50)
STATE
PARK FEES FUND
GRANT (PRP A) FD
(6,725-91)
19,241.00
3,433.47
(3,664.94)
(17,890.73)
206,759.84
S PARKS
COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FD
30,013.32)
216,472.10
9,712.26
10,696.00
48,078.85
119,284.06
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
DIST #39 FD
58 774,85
9,285.36
420,236.26
0.00
LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
128,569.42
423 912.13
3,675.87
819.13
819.13
102,560.10
GRAND AN/ CONST FUND
FEE FD
0.00
43199.98
78,310.64
139,588.76
TRAFFIC MITIGATION
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
67,"9.44
139,588.76
381,784.20
311 535 125.88
SB 821 FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
381,784.20
$11 184 703.40 1 251 358.51
900 936.03
$0.00
TOTALS
SU__ MMARY O__ FISH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT
$291,563.65
1.280.61
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
100.00
CHANGE FUND
CASH ACCOUNT
500.00
PETTY
$293,444.26
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
$0.00
INVESTMENTS:
TIME CERTIFICATES
0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER
11,241,681.62
L.A.I.F.
11,241,681.62
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
$11,535,125.88
TOTAL CASH
CARL WARREN & CO.
To: City of Diamond Bar
ATTENTION: Lynda Burgess, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
94 APR 26 Pl1 1: 28
April 25, 1994
RE: Claim Magdesian vs. Diamond Bar
Claimant Charles Magdesian
D/Event 4-11-94
Recd Y/Office S 194-94
82 AB
Our File
We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the
action indicated below:
[g] nTUx REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.
] c-ry�TM TNSUFFTCI •NF CY: In accordance ailed tohthe c one conversation of
arimant no later than
* a notice of insufficiency must
*, 19*. THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DDQ N AY ON F RECEIPT
See
THE ORIGINAL CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE.
Government Code Sections 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4.
] AMENDED/SrTppiEMENTAL ChAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to the
claimant, rejecting this additional/amended claim.
]nTE CLAIhe
M RESPONSE: Return the original claim mater
recoursel to tis
claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only ".(Return
to file a written "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim
copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE . DO NOT SEND ATo THE CLAI°REJ� TION" LETTERT WITHIN 45 S
OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR OF
FI
Code Section 911.4
npprTCATIoN REJECTIONz- Reject claimant's "Application for Leave to
Present a Late Claim. See Government Code Section 911.8.
mrY� un nc"r'30N: Defer any written response to the claimant pending
our further advise.
Please provide us with a copy
of the notice sent, as requested above. If
you have any questions please contact the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
L WARREN & COMPANY
T YII,�-\
Dwight K z
TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
INSTRU CTION S
1. Claims for death, injury to person or to per>onai property must be filed not
later than 6 r,os. after the occurrence. (Gov. Ccde Sec. 911..:)
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed no-. later than 1 year after the
occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2)
3. Read entire claim before filing.
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to I)cate place of accident.
5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to sve '.ull deals. SIGN EACH SHEET.
7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Cov. Code S• -c. 915a)
To: The City of Diamond Bar
Name of Claimant
Charles Magdesian _
Home Address of Claimant City and State
2124 Derringer Lane, Diamond Bar, CA
Business Address of Claimant City and State
730 Fifth Ave, City of Industry, CA 91745
Give address to which ycu desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
Home
How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give furl particulars.
Two tree branches fell on car
W -hen did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day:
4-11-94 at 6:00 P.M.
94 AN 19 Pit 4: 29
Age of Claimant (if natural person)
42
Home Telephone Number
(909) 396-0134
Business Telephone Number
•818) 330-3384
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
sweet names and addresses and measurements from landmarks:
Grand Avenue going south. The last tree before )bntefino.
13; -hat particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or
:a.:.age, if known:
There is still a branch that should be trimmed. It is ready to fall.
What D.iNL.GE cr INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claunea:
Broken windshield and auto body damage.
What A.MOL ,, T do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis of
mrnputauon:
Windshield: $500.00 Body work: $862.14
Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospects+e injury or damage, giving basis of
zomputation:
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
Insurance payments -eceived, ar`' a zs of .:a: arce Cor par.y:
Sa I surance ��==
Expenditures made on account of acc:ee-ltr1 'LLr
Window work: $500.00
\ame
Hospi:ais:
and adcr'Es of ',�i, e'ses. Doc: ors ar.- 90604 and
Mc Allister Cadillac 15311 E. Whittier Blvd.' Whittier CA
Windshield America, 735 W. Alosta Ave., Glendora, CA 91740
REND CAREFULLY
For all accident claims place on foL'ox:nom dingrarn names of streets, inducing North, East, South, and West; indicate place
accident by ''X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners.
you
I: Cvehicle when y involved, first aweC yate by veh clee location lof Cio3 vehicle cle at vehicle
of accident lby 'A-1" and location of yourself cr of , ^e j.'
or your
vehicle
vehicle at the time of . the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "
NOTE: If dia;rams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant.
TS
J
7
FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDEN
R OTHER ACCIDENTS
FO
�o
k~
o�
SIDEWALK
CURe--+
GRAND AVE.
7 ///
f car pARICPJAY
tree♦
SIDEWALK
(please see enclosed, enlarged diagram)
Signature of Claimant or person filing on his behalf giving Typed Name:
relationship `�)cl�� Charles Magdesian
-T-,,c -,.Tr-c-' -,;F FITTED W!"I'li CI'_^Y CI EEK (GCV. CME SEC. 913a)
CURB
Date
4-19-94
Im
7
Z
�
O
I
�
I �
I 4
f
AGENDA NO.=Z
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT
City Manager April 26, 1994
Terrence L. Belanger REpORT DATE:
TO: May 3, 1994 Interim City Engineer
MEETING DATE: George A. Wentz,
FROM:
to the Los Angles County
0006 and County Lighting District LLA -1•
Annexation of street LLA -1 -
lights Bent field place
TITLE: Ann
1
Lighting Maintenance District of street
maintenance it is
funds for operation by the developerf 10006 and
In order to provide f Were installed County L14D
SUMMARY: place which lights into the
lights on Benfield said street
necessary to incorporate
County Lighting District LLA -1• ranting
94 -XX g
Council adopt Resolution VO- x street lights
That the City of Los Angeles to tion and shown on
RECOMMENDATION: to the County al description n recommended
jurisdiction in the attached legal of the
consent and described of Diamond Bar• executed copies
within the territory City provide two (2) County Department
the attached map, within the Angeles
the City Clerk be
dire a tion to the Los
that of the City Council
Resolution
of public works. Hearing
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolutions)
ordinances(s)
_
Agreement (9)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
public
Notification on file
Bid Specif Clerk s (Off ice)
in City Ma
X other: V init
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: agreement been
n ordinance or
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Has the resolutio I Attorney? 4 5 vote?
reviewed by the City majority or /
Does the report require a e
impact been assessed commission?
Has environmental a Comm
Has the report been reviewed by
affected by the report'
Which Commission? affected
Are other departments following
Report discussed with the
EWED BY:
Terrence L. Be
City Manager
Frani r' •v City Manager
Assistant
reviewed by the City
X Yes s No
Mal or y
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
departments: N/A —
' Awen Engineer
im City
CITY Corwomm AMMO 2T
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994
AGENDA NO.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Annexation of street lights on Benfield Place to the Los
Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District (LMD) 10006 and
County Lighting District LLA -1.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
To annex street lights on Benfield Place to the Los Angeles County Lighting
Maintenance District (LMD) 10006 and County Lighting District LLA -1.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 94 -XX granting consent and
jurisdiction to the County of Los Angeles to annex street lights within the
territory described in the attached legal description and shown on the
attached map, within the City of Diamond Bar. Further, it is recommended
that the City Clerk be directed to provide two (2) executed copies of the
Resolution of the City Council's action to the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The proposed recommendation has no impact on the City's Fiscal Year 1993-94
budget.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
In order to provide funds for operation and maintenance of street lights, the
area legally described and shown on the attached map, needs to be annexed
into the County LMD 10006 and County Lighting District LLA -1. Prior to
annexation, however, the County of Los Angeles needs to be granted permission
from the City of Diamond Bar. The annual cost per residence as provided by
the County is anticipated not to exceed $48.00.
PREPARED BY:
David G. Liu
Tseday Aberra
M�
R BIu2t R ryq,
• . � � - . +� «I //' � � (,ops c o ps o,,�
`S a '9�'4 "d I r e @fo° •i V',e Bi°`�a�b�° �+,2 s
It
t 3 sJ a�fl� 4q4 tea° Averllda RanChe 9 6 J Dr auiGtr
�, a � e ceexDr fuo e hays `s9 d— V
P• t
d I Ore n r wA^°^ 9 arm iilips yom°n '
and Vali _ 6 a„yH 9 �� Ri �� s
Pk
In° Ips b F5 3 vrn Gr Ct'Rd36� I �n� °4� e\Or 6°Ws""�vI 5 v c a
'b Ln
ewe Dr O pwoo� 4a TOS° aw• a`sC' wood
oo P1� v° Gti�7 m
` S 111 pBower w �� 5 g Carlton J. $ m to
/ � aose0
D Creak Pk
son /Gnc Y Rd $ Rto
R Y�rA ra ° Irl�w Q� F� r d6
}s
s4 a peG° pt m 1't° 60 POMONA w
enrstc ,°pe1Golu
F° see' 5p° mm3a� SQ �f _ Iq
a Dr •fC � �[Q 6 34 � � OIPKo a` 4 Q
va`-4 9a�a° ey a v
ROckb. H
D $ Zg Tory ° , �} G
-�8 o N wummmr
n a wdaio.rer r.
O� p�1 Crom� Gem Pl 'ao „ aeip9 9
Pantera Qt I
LorIbbBAR
Cove♦ �S s l �"'o} S �°
°1 Go]dSrush Cove P1 O 0 m �o`+fi 3 CITY OF DIAM Chino Av
VICIFff H"
r
c tyv F°r Lost Rld�
?ArLt1eid?I vLst°�
T Dr
COWllrll = r7 $ T. / C Sonrrver Oc '. /
� - Q1 ° O Dr — � D` � Pencar pl / °
Longe j
pCA-
• A � 4�s � c5 yt X I _ ` ,��
O G
o , 2� diso
Rio 5.- Sc Ait�/�EXii7lJ mnderT[ n
E
Gnl PI tv P n nrg
hOl+h O 7 Dr
C r�U O CI 1 4 <�u`t>3`j� Yy / .!1�
2 3 nt Cyr. Dr l .Rapid Brook'I ll rear t
tr 2. Silver SPm'Q �p a m' r6arr
> Iy 3. GmYsn *T& Ln Siur s ,3� a�-C rE� ,� I C'' J�
4 ° LI�� /� of v 's nki„t ry e e c Ives cl
3 d 4 C a �O1d L° a ° awel it ` / a4
J p toAv Sum �fQIjQ p;
Ride
Q, hill
P. hill
Dlam Q--<
a
o 111
e m haPP� v p Oi ARtiOLD t�nomveD.-D�Ln
ara Grow n o 4' a renvice
" jnt Schy4 8 0 Pk oY°`a Dla�o z vC� o / RESERVOIR;A N l nr Rrser
� Dr �
I
e �
the Ra res o
41 S age �O
a t 2
Rd
C/ �,� ?ry ��d'�cee� Rd i
nf` 111 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
+*r
r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
X - x 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
I RNA ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331
Telephone: (818) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
THOMAS A, TIDEMANSON, Director
P.O.BOX 1460
April 6, 1994 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460
The area shown on the enclosed map is being processed for
annexation to the subject lighting districts in order to provide
funds for the operation and maintenance of street lights to be
installed by the developer. Since this area is within the
boundaries of the City of Diamond Bar, we will need permission from
your City Council before the annexation procedures can be
consummated.
Enclosed are three copies of a Resolution Granting Consent and
Jurisdiction to the County of Los Angeles in the matter of annexing
this area to the subject lighting districts.
Please present this Resolution to your Council for their
consideration as soon as possible. Upon your Council's adoption of
the Resolution, please have two copies of each executed and
returned to this Department for further processing. You may keep
the remaining copy for your records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
Mr. Steve Lau of our Traffic and Lighting Division, Street Lighting
Section, at (818) 458-5926.
Very truly yours,
HARRY W. STONE
Acting Director of Public Works
SL:cs
P283
Enc.
IN REPLY PLEASE
T-3
Mr. Terry Belanger
REFER TO FILE
City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley Drive
33
Suite 100
a
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
M
Dear Mr. Belanger:
--
M`t
X
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006
-� 3
3
AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1
_wiz
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PROJECT NUMBER 283-107
.�
The area shown on the enclosed map is being processed for
annexation to the subject lighting districts in order to provide
funds for the operation and maintenance of street lights to be
installed by the developer. Since this area is within the
boundaries of the City of Diamond Bar, we will need permission from
your City Council before the annexation procedures can be
consummated.
Enclosed are three copies of a Resolution Granting Consent and
Jurisdiction to the County of Los Angeles in the matter of annexing
this area to the subject lighting districts.
Please present this Resolution to your Council for their
consideration as soon as possible. Upon your Council's adoption of
the Resolution, please have two copies of each executed and
returned to this Department for further processing. You may keep
the remaining copy for your records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
Mr. Steve Lau of our Traffic and Lighting Division, Street Lighting
Section, at (818) 458-5926.
Very truly yours,
HARRY W. STONE
Acting Director of Public Works
SL:cs
P283
Enc.
AGENDA ITEM NO, 8.1
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR '&
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City ManagerAprilDATE: April 26, 1994
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2 (1994), an ordinance amending
Title 22 of the e standards os engeles
code
County Code by adding a new Chapter 22.54 and establishing property
Amendment No. 93-3).
SUMMARY: On April 19, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing, received testimony, waived first
reading, and approved as amended, Ordinance No. 2 (1994).
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve second reading and adopt Ordinance
OUNCIL OF THE CITY OFD MOND BAR
No. 2 (1994) entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY C
AMENDING TITLE 22 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAP'T'ER 22.54
AND ESTABLISHING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STAN
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:— Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
X Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
Other
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: None
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes — No
by the City Attorney? MAJORITY2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? X Yes — No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? —
Which Commission? Yes X No
5. Are other departments affected by the report? —
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
L
WED B :
3—
Frank Usher irector
Terrence L. Belanger
es DeStefano
City Manager
Assistant City Manager Community Devel ment D
F
ORDINANCE NO. 2 (1994)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING TITLE 22 OF THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
22.54 AND ESTABLISHING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
STANDARDS.
A. Recitals.
(i) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was
established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California and, on that date, the City Council adopted,
by reference, the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of
the City, including Title 22 thereof, pertaining to Planning and
Zoning Regulations for the City of Diamond Bar.
(ii) The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond
Bar has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public
hearing, as required by law, and has recommended the adoption of
the Ordinance set forth below.
(iii) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar has
heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing,
as required by law, with respect to the adoption of this
Ordinance.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows:
Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the
Recitals, part A, of this Ordinance.
May 2, 1994
1
Changes appear as follows:
Additions from 4119194 City Council Meering
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and
determines that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder pursuant to Section 15305 of Division 6 of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations.
Section 3. A new Chapter 22.54 is hereby added to
Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code as amended & adopted by
the City, to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"Chapter 22.54
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
Parts:
1. Purpose and Intent
2. Definitions
3. Single -Family Standards
4. Multifamily Standards
5. Commercial Standards
6. Industrial Standards
7. Abatement Procedures
Part 1
PURPOSE AND INTENT
Sections:
22.54.010 Purpose and Intent
The lack of property maintenance contributes to the
deterioration of residential, commercial and industrial
properties, including structures, landscaping and improvements
thereon, and a resulting decline in property values within the
City of Diamond Bar. Such deterioration may lead to an overall
decline of aesthetic quality within the City including the
quality of the appearance of residential, commercial and
industrial neighborhoods. Further, deteriorating conditions of
May 2, 1994 2
property may contribute to the creation of conditions adverse to
the public health, safety and welfare.
Establishing property maintenance standards,
through the adoption of this Ordinance, will serve to preserve
and improve the overall condition of properties and structures in
the City of Diamond Bar, and will further serve to minimize the
creation of conditions which pose a risk to the public health,
safety and welfare.
It is the intent of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar, in adopting this Ordinance, to be sensitive to
the needs of financially and/or physically disadvantaged
residents, while concurrently providing a useful property
maintenance enforcement tool to be utilized when notification of
responsible parties and attempts to prevent or eliminate the
conditions described herein have proven ineffective.
Part 2
DEFINITIONS
Sections:
22.54.020 Purpose
22.54.030 Nuisances in General
22.54.040 Public Nuisance
22.54.050 Nuisance Per Se
22.54.060 Commercial Vehicles
22.54.070 Driveway
22.54.080 Yard
22.54.020 Purpose
For the purposes of this chapter, and in addition to
the definitions set forth in the previous chapters of this code,
certain terms, phrases and words and their derivatives shall be
May 2, 1994 3
defined as set out in this section. Words used in the singular
include the plural and vice versa.
22.54.030 Nuisances in General
State law defines a "nuisance" as being "anything which
is injurious to health, or is indecent, or offensive to the
senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to
interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property."
Cal. Civ. Code §370 (1992); Cal. Penal Code § 3479.
22.54.040 Public Nuisance
A public nuisance affects an entire community or
neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons at the same
time, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted
upon individuals may be unequal. Cal. Civ. Code §
3480. A public
nuisance is an act or omission which interferes with the
interests of the community or _ � _Ma
-interferes with the public health, `
safety, and welfare.
22.54.050 Nuisance Per Se
Examples of activities that are nuisances per se
include water pollution by discharge, structures which amount to
rd, noise, air pollution, weeds, rubbish and refuse,
afire haza
junkyards, earth movement and illegal signs.
4
May 2, 1994
22.54.060 commercial Vehicles
(a) A "commercial vehicle" is a vehicle of a type
required to be registered under the Vehicle Code used or
maintained for the transportation of persons for hire,
compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained
primarily for the transportation of property.
(b) Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit and
housecars are not commercial vehicles.
(c) Any vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.
22.54.070 Driveway
(a) That approach portion of the road right of way
where motor vehicles enter or leave the highway onto private
property.
(b) A private roadway providing access to a street,
highway or off-street parking facilities.
22.54.080 Yard
(a) "Front yard" means a yard extending across the
full width of a lot between the front lot line and any main
building, including the projection of the main building to the
side lot lines.(See Diagram A)
(b) "Side yard" means a yard extending from the front
yard to the rear yard between the side lot line and any main or
accessory building. In the case of a side yard abutting a street,
the.side yard is considered as extending from the front yard to
the rear lot line.(See Diagram A)
5
May 2, 1994
(c) "Rear yard means a yard extending across the full
width of a lot between the rear lot line and any main building,
including the projections of the main building to the side lot
lines except as noted in 2 above. (See Diagram A)
22.54.090 Code Enforcement Official
Code Enforcement Official shall mean the City Manager
or any person authorized or designated by the City Manager to
enforce the provisions of this Ordinance.
Part 3
SINGLE-FAMILY STANDARDS
Sections:
22.54.100 Scope.
22.54.110 Storage --Front yard/side yard abutting a
street.
22.54.120 Motor vehicle parking.
22.54.130 Building maintenance.
22.54.140 Landscape maintenance.
22.54.150 Fence and wall maintenance.
22.54.100 SCOPE
The standards specified in Part 2 shall apply to
all lots or parcels within the City designated as single-
family, and shall govern over any inconsistent, less
stringent provisions contained in this Code.
22.54.110 storage --Front yard/side yard abutting a
street.
A. The entire front yard, and side yard visible from
an adjacent street or sidewalk, shall be kept and
maintained free and clear of all construction and automotive
May 2, 1994 6
materials or parts, trash, refuse, debris, trash storage
receptacles, inoperative motor vehicles, dismounted camper
shells, discarded or broken materials, appliances,
furniture, junk, equipment or similar materials.
B. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A of
this section, emergency or minor repairs of a motor vehicle owned
by a person residing upon the lot or parcel may be conducted on
an otherwise operative motor vehicle upon a paved driveway or
paved parking area; provided, however, that such emergency or
minor repair shall be concluded within ten (10) consecutive days
of the commencement thereof or up to thirty (30) days at the
discretion of the hearing officer.
C. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A
and B of this section, a side yard abutting a street shall be
screened by an approved, view -obscuring wall or fence.
22.54.120 Motor Vehicle Parking
A. All parking of motor vehicles, including
recreational vehicles, on a single-family lot or parcel shall
occur within a garage, or carport, or upon a driveway or other
paved parking area which is in compliance with all applicable
codes. if parked on a side yard, an open pedestrian walkway of
a width of not less than 36" shall be maintained on one side yard
for public safety access purposes.
B. No person shall park or store any commercial
vehicle, commercial trailer or related commercial equipment for
any period in excess of 72 hours provided that no more than two
7
May 2, 1994
such permitted vehicles may be parked on any such lot or parcel
at any one time.
22.54.130 Building Maintenance
All buildings, structures and paved areas within any
lot or parcel designated as single-family shall be kept and
maintained in a manner so as not to constitute a public nuisance
or a nuisance per se. All such buildings, structures and paved
areas shall be deemed substandard and in violation of this
section when any or all of the same display evidence of exterior
dilapidated conditions.
22.54.140 Landscape maintenance
All landscaped areas within the front yard of any
developed lot or parcel designated as single-family shall be kept
and maintained in a manner so as not to constitute a public
nuisance or nuisance per se.
Landscaped areas shall be kept in a neat and clean
condition, substantially free of debris and dead, diseased or
dying vegetation, and broken or defective decorative elements of
the landscaped area. Foliage in landscaped areas shall be mowed,
groomed, trimmed, pruned and adequately watered so as to keep the
same in a healthy growing condition. Irrigation systems shall be
maintained in such a manner as to prevent public health or safety
hazards.
22.54.150 Fence and wall maintenance
8
May 2, 1994
A. All fences and walls upon any lot or parcel
designated as single-family shall be kept and maintained in
compliance with all applicable codes and in a manner so as not to
constitute a public nuisance or nuisance per se and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and the
general public.
B. All fences and walls utilized for screening
purposes as required by this Part, shall be constructed of.such
material, as permitted by applicable law.
Part 4
MULTIFAMILY STANDARDS
Sections:
22.54.160 Scope.
22.54.170 Storage -Yards
22.54.180 Storage -Garages and carports
22.54.190 Motor vehicle parking
22.54.200 Building maintenance
22..54.210 Landscape maintenance
22.54.220 Fence and wall maintenance
22.54.230 Maintenance of parking and similar areas
22.54.160 Scope
The standards specified in Part 4 shall apply to all
lots or parcels within the city designated as multi -family, and
shall govern over any inconsistent, less stringent provisions
contained in this code.
22.54.170 Storage --Yards
A. The entire front yard and side yard abutting a
street shall be kept and maintained free and clear of all
construction and automotive materials or parts, trash, refuse,
9
May 2, 1994
debris, trash storage receptacles, inoperative motor vehicles,
boats, camper shells, discarded or broken materials, appliances,
furniture, junk, equipment or similar materials. All rubbish,
trash and debris shall only be kept within approved trash
enclosure(s).
B. "Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A of
this section, emergency or minor repairs of a motor vehicle owned
by a person residing upon the lot or parcel may be conducted on
an otherwise operative motor vehicle upon a paved driveway or
paved parking area; provided, however, that such emergency or
minor repair shall be concluded within ten (10) consecutive days
of the commencement thereof or a maximum of thirty (30) days as
approved by the hearing officer.
22.54.180 Storage --Garage and carports
No storage of materials, including, but not limited to,
trash and trash receptacles, newspapers, building and automotive
materials, landscape maintenance tools, equipment, debris,
inoperative motor vehicles, camper shell not mounted on motor
vehicles or boats and trailers shall be permitted within any
garage or carport so as to restrict the parking of an operative
motor vehicle in the required parking spaces.
22.54.190 Motor vehicle parking
A. All parking of motor vehicles on a multifamily lot
or parcel shall occur within a garage, or carport, or upon a
driveway or other paved parking area which is in compliance with
all applicable codes. If parked on a yard, an open pedestrian
May 2, 1994 10
walkway of a width of not less than 36" shall be maintained on
one side yard for public safety access purposes.
B. No person shall park or store any commercial
vehicle, trailer or related equipment for any period in excess of
72 hours provided that no more than two such permitted vehicles
may be parked on any such lot or parcel at any one time.
22.54.200 Building maintenance
All buildings, structures and paved areas within any
lot or parcel designated as multifamily shall be kept and
maintained in a manner so as not to constitute a public nuisance
or nuisance per se. All such buildings, structures and paved
areas shall be deemed substandard and in violation of this
section when any or all of the same display evidence of exterior
dilapidated conditions.
22.54.210 Landscape maintenance
All landscaped areas within the front yard of any lot
or parcel designated as multifamily shall be kept and maintained
in a manner so as not to constitute a public nuisance or nuisance
per se. Landscaped areas shall be kept in a neat and clean
condition, substantially free of debris and dead, diseased or
dying vegetation, and broken or defective decorative elements of
the landscaped area. Foliage in landscaped areas shall be mowed,
groomed, trimmed, pruned and watered as to keep the same in a
healthy growing condition. Irrigation systems shall be
maintained in such a manner as to prevent public health or safety
hazards.
11
May 2, 1994
22.54.220 Pence and wall maintenance
A. All fences and walls upon any lot or parcel
designated as single-family shall be kept and maintained in
compliance with all applicable codes and in a manner so as not to
constitute a public nuisance or nuisance per se and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and the
general public.
B. All fences and walls utilized for screening
purposes as required by this Part, shall be constructed of such
materials, as permitted by applicable law.
22.54.230 Maintenance of parking and similar areas
All parking, loading, storage, driveway and vehicle
maneuvering areas within any lot or parcel designated as
multifamily shall be kept and maintained so as not to detract
from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and general
public. Such areas shall be kept in a neat and clean condition,
free of trash, debris or rubbish, and free of potholes,
sinkholes, standing water, cracks and/or broken areas. parking
space delineation, pavement striping and related features and
signs shall be repainted, refurbished and/or replaced when the
same become faded, damaged or destroyed to such an extent as to
no longer be effective. Such areas shall be periodically
resurfaced or sealed in order to minimize seepage of water
through such areas into the ground below.
May 2, 1994 12
Part 5
COMMERCIAL STANDARDS
Sections:
22.54.240 Scope.
22.54.250 Storage in yards.
22.54.260 Motor vehicle parking.
22.54.270 Building maintenance.
22.54.280 Landscape maintenance.
22.54.290 Fence and wall maintenance
22.54.300 Maintenance of parking and similar
areas.
22.54.240 Scope.
The standards specified in Part 5 shall apply to.all
lots or parcels within the City designated as commercial, and
shall govern over any inconsistent, less stringent provisions
contained in this Code.
22.54.250 Storage in yards.
All storage within front and side yard areas approved
by the City or permitted by the zoning ordinance shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly fashion and shall contain only
items and/or vehicles incidental to the business, or owned by the
business or owner of the business.
22.54.260 Motor vehicle parking
A. All parking of motor vehicles on a commercial lot
or parcel shall occur upon a paved parking area which is in
compliance with all applicable codes. If parked on one side
yard, an open pedestrian walkway of a width of not less than 36"
shall be maintained for public safety access purposes.
May 2, 1994 13
B. No person shall park or store any commercial
vehicle, trailer or related equipment for any period in excess of
h permitted vehicles
72 hours provided that no more than two suc
may be parked on any such lot or parcel at any one time.
22.54.270 Building Maintenance
All buildings, structures and paved areas within any
lot or parcel designated as commercial shall be kept and
maintained in a manner so as'not to detract from the neighborhood
and to protect the health, safety and welfare of the user,
occupant and general public. All such buildings, structures and
paved areas shall be deemed substandard and in violation of this
section when any or all of the same display evidence of exterior
dilapidated conditions.
22.54.280 Landscape maintenance
All landscaped areas within the front yard of any lot
commercial shall be kept and maintained
or parcel designated as
in a manner so as not to detract from the appearance of the
immediate neighborhood and to protect the health, safety and
ant and general public.
occupant welfare of the user, P
Landscaped areas shall be kept in a neat and clean
condition, substantially free of weeds,
debris and dead, diseased
or dying vegetation, and broken or defective decorative elements
of the landscaped area. Foliage in landscaped areas shall be
mowed, groomed, trimmed, pruned and watered as to keep the same
in a healthy growing condition. Irrigation systems shall be kept
in good working condition to prevent public health hazards.
14
May 2, 1994
22.54.290 Fence and wall maintenance
A. All fences and walls upon any lot or parcel
designated as commercial shall be kept and maintained in
compliance with all applicable codes and in a manner so as not to
constitute a public nuisance or nuisance per se and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and the
general public.
B. All fences and walls utilized for screening
purposes as required by this Part, shall be constructed of such
materials, as permitted by applicable law.
22.54.300 Maintenance of parking and similar areas
All parking, loading, storage, driveway and vehicle
maneuvering areas within any lot or parcel designated as
commercial shall be kept and maintained so as to not detract from
the appearance of the immediate neighborhood and to protect the
health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and general
public. Such areas shall be kept in a neat and clean condition,
free of trash, debris or rubbish, and free of potholes,
sinkholes, standing water, cracks and/or broken areas. Parking
space delineation, pavement striping and related features and
signs shall be repainted, refurbished and/or replaced when the
same become faded, damaged or destroyed to such an extent as to
no longer be effective. Such areas shall be periodically
resurfaced or sealed in order to minimize seepage of water
through such areas into the ground below. The provisions
contained within this Section shall apply to private property
open to the public.
May 2, 1994 15
Part 6
Industrial Standards
Sections:
22.54.310 Scope.
22.54.320 Storage in yards.
22.54.330 Motor vehicle parking.
22.54.340 Building maintenance.
22.54.350 Landscape maintenance.
22.54.360 Fence and wall maintenance.
22.54.370 Maintenance of parking and similar areas
22.54.310
The standards specified in Part 6 shall apply to all
lots or parcels within the city designated as industrial, and
shall govern over any inconsistent, less stringent provisions
contained in this code.
22.54.320 Storage in yards
All storage within yard areas approved by the City or
permitted by the zoning ordinance shall be maintained in a neat
and orderly fashion and shall contain only items and/or vehicles
incidental to the business, or owned by the business or owner of
the business.
22.54.330 Motor vehicle parking
A. All parking of motor vehicles on an industrial lot
or parcel shall occur upon a paved area which is in compliance
with all applicable codes, unless otherwise approved by the
Planning Commission and/or City Council. If parked on one side
yard, an open pedestrian walkway of a width of not less than 36"
shall be maintained for public safety access purposes.
May 2, 1994 16
22.54.340 Building Maintenance
All buildings, structures and paved areas within any
lot or parcel designated as industrial shall be kept and
maintained in a manner so as not to constitute a public nuisance
or nuisance per se. All such buildings, structures and paved
areas shall be deemed substandard and in violation of this
section when any or all of the same display evidence of exterior
dilapidated conditions.
22.54.350 Landscape maintenance
All landscaped areas within the front yard of any lot
or parcel designated as industrial shall be kept and maintained
in a manner so as not to constitute a public nuisance or nuisance
per se Landscaped areas shall be kept in a neat and clean
condition, substantially free of debris and dead, diseased or
dying vegetation, and broken or defective decorative elements of
the landscaped area. Foliage in landscaped areas shall be mowed,
groomed, trimmed, pruned and watered as to keep the same in a
healthy growing condition. Irrigation systems shall be
maintained in such a manner so as to prevent public health or
safety hazards.
22.54.360 Fence and wall maintenance
May 2, 1994 17
A. All fences and walls upon any lot or parcel
designated as industrial shall be kept and maintained in
compliance with all applicable codes and in a manner so as not to
constitute a public nuisance or nuisance per se and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and the
general public.
1. Sagging, broken, rotted or defective support posts
or other structural or decorative member;
2. Missing fence boards;
3. Damaged or missing blocks from a block wall.
4. Substantial areas of deterioration including dry
rot, broken or missing pieces of stucco, holes, or
warped or leaning fence or wall areas;
5. Chain link fence material which is damaged or
broken.
B. All fences and walls utilized for screening
purposes as required by this Part, shall be constructed of such
materials, as permitted by applicable law.
22.54.370 Maintenance of parking and similar areas
All parking, loading, storage, driveway and vehicle
maneuvering areas within any lot or parcel designated as
industrial shall be kept and maintained so as to not detract from
the appearance of the immediate neighborhood and to protect the
health, safety and welfare of the user, occupant and general
public. Such areas shall be kept in a neat and clean condition,
free of trash, debris or rubbish,'and free of potholes,
sinkholes, standing water, cracks and/or broken areas. Parking
18
May 2, 1994
space delineation, pavement striping and related features and
signs shall be repainted, refurbished and/or replaced when the
same become faded, damaged or destroyed to such an extent as to
no longer be effective. Such areas shall be periodically
resurfaced or sealed in order to minimize seepage of water
through such areas into the ground below. The provisions
contained within this Section shall apply to private property
open to the public.
DIAGRAM A
ILLUSTRATION OF LOT LINE
AND YARD DESIGNATIONS
Street (Curb face)
.
May 2, 1994 19
CFront Lot Line
M
i FRONT YARD i
C
•-- --------
----•
a.+--
rA
BUILDING '
A
«t
i I
¢ 92
C
rA------------
------1
1
REAR YARD i
Rear Lot Line
May 2, 1994 19
Part 7
ABATEMENT PROCEDURES
Sections:
22.54.400 Procedures for Abatement of Public Nuisances
22.54.410 Appeals
22.54.420 Abatement of Public Nuisance by the City
22.54.430 Abatement of Imminently Dangerous Public
Nuisance
22.54.440 Account of Abatement Costs
22.54.450 Procedure for Special Assessment
22.54.460 Hearing on Proposed Assessment Abatement.
22.54.470 Contest of Assessment
22.54.480 Notice of Lien
22.54.490 Procedures for Collection with Regular Taxes
22.54.500 Remedies'of Private Parties
22.54.510 Right of Entry
22.54.520 Continuing Violations
22.54-.530 Penalty for Violation
22.54.540 Injunction
22.54.550 Severability
22.54.400 Procedures for abatement of public nuisances
or nuisances per se.
Whenever the City Manager or designee has inspected or
caused to be inspected any property and has determined that an
unlawful condition constituting a public nuisance or nuisance per
se exists thereon, the Code Enforcement Official may use the
procedures set forth in this section for the abatement of such
public nuisance; provided, however, that if the public nuisance
is determined to be imminently dangerous to life or adjacent
property and to require immediate removal, repair or isolation,
the procedures set forth in this ordinance may be used by the
Code Enforcement Official.
(A) HEARING NOTICE
1. Where the Code Enforcement Official determines that a
public nuisance or nuisance per se exists, he shall so advise
20
May 2, 1994
orally the affected party, (owner(s), agent, lessee, occupant or
person(s) in possession of the affected properties as shown on
the latest equalized tax assessment role) and shall give not less
than 7 days written notice by mailing the same to the owner's
address as indicated thereon, and further, within the same time
period, by conspicuously posting on the affected property,
building or structure a copy of the notice.
2. Both the oral and written notice shall indicate the
nature of the alleged nuisance, the description of the property
involved, and the designation of the time and place of the
hearing to determine whether the same constitutes a nuisance, and
the manner of its proposed abatement if the same is found to be a
nuisance.
3. The written notice and order of abatement shall be
served to the affected party by regular and certified mail;
however, the failure of any person to receive a notice shall not
affect the validity of any proceedings under this chapter.
(B) CONDUCT
1. 'The hearings to determine whether a nuisance exists
shall be conducted by the City Manager or his duly authorized
representative, who shall act as the Hearing Officer. The
Hearing Officer is authorized to take testimony and in the course
of so doing is authorized to administer oaths or affirmations
pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2093(a).
2. Prior to the taking of testimony, the Hearing Officer
shall offer a mediation procedure to the affected party. If
mediation is refused, or is unsuccessful in alleviating the
unlawful condition, then the matter shall proceed to hearings.
May 2, 1994 2 1
In no event shall the mediation process delay the hearing process
for more than 30 days from the date initially set for hearing.
3. At the hearings, the Hearing Officer shall consider all
relevant evidence, including but not limited to applicable staff
reports. He shall give any interested person a reasonable
opportunity to be heard in conjunction therewith. All witnesses
are subject to cross examination. Based upon the evidence so
presented, the Hearing Officer shall determine whether a nuisance
within the meaning of this chapter exists.
4. The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be final and
conclusive in the absence of an appeal as provided in this
chapter.
(C) ORDER OF ABATEMENT
The Hearing Officer shall, within five working days of the
hearing, give a copy of the written notice of his decision by
regular and certified mail to the owner(s) and a copy to any
other person requesting the same. The decision shall contain an
order of abatement, if a nuisance is determined to exist,
directed to the owner(s) of the affected property or the person
in the control and/or charge of the property, and shall set forth
the nature of the nuisance, its location, and the time and manner
for its abatement. Notice of the period of limitation for
judicial review, as prescribed in §2, shall be provided in the
notice and decision. (See exhibit A for a sample form of note.)
(D) EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERFORM WORK.
Upon receipt of a written request from any person required
to comply with the notice and order, the Hearing Officer may
grant an extension of time within which to complete the
May 2, 1994 22
abatement, if the Hearing officer determines that such an
extension of time will not create a situation imminently
dangerous to life or property. The Hearing officer shall have
the authority to place reasonable conditions on any such
extension. The Hearing officer may take into account economic
hardship and/or physical disability on the part of the affected
party when granting such an extension. The hearing officer shall
have discretionary approval to extend the length of time for the
abatement proceeding based upon findings of fact such as
(1) A determination that special circumstances or
exceptional characteristics exist applicable to the property
involved, such as size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings that are not generally applicable to other
properties in the same vicinity and under identical zoning
classification.
(b) A determination that an extension of time is necessary
for the preservation of a substantial property right of the
applicant, such as that possessed by owners of other
property or in the same vicinity and zone.
(c) A determination that an extension of time would not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious
to other property or improvements in the same vicinity and
zone.
23
May 2, 1994
Exhibit "A"
Example of Notice
"NOTICE AND ORDER TO ABATE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
TO THE OWNER(S), AGENT OF THE OWNER(S), LESSEE, OCCUPANT, OR PERSON IN
POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED:
The building, structure, improvement, or property which is the subject OT this BLOCK
s situated,CT the City
of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, on premises described as _
RA
commonly known as
ovisions _ of the Municipal Code of the
_
YOUR ATTENTION Iia on R eBn the oEffceEoff the City D to the rClerk in the City Hall.
City of Diamond Bar, Co
you are hereby notified that the violations consist of
Pursuant to the provisions of —, �—
----- - ter. TTATT AWT7TTT. CONDITION -SI
You are further notified and ordered to abate the above specified conditions by taking the following actions (s):
DESCRIPTION TOF ACTIS NECESSARY NLAWFUOLNCONDITIONS) (TO ABATE
days from the da
of Your receipt of
is
Such action(s) must be completed within (insert from epeLfree) of any of the unlawful condit ons described
notice and order, and thereafter you must maintain P P rty
above. It is your responsibility to obtain all appropriate permits and to dispose of any material or materials
involved in the pubic nuisance in a legal manner.
rsigned
In the event you fail to complete such work within the imeh tmherefor will bOve tbe alien upon the property
l
cause the appropriate action to be taken and completed, and the
or upon the lot or parcel of land adjoining and abutting the public right-of-way or sidewalk in the event the public
right-of-way or sidewalk is to be cleaned or otherwise protected.
peal
You are advised that any person(s) holding record title or having any interest in the
eop ion withinrty may ten
en
from this notice. and order, or any determination
and order. Written noe. Hearing Otice of cer such ePlanning appeal must be filed in the office of
days from the date of service re this
Bar, CA
the Planning Commission Secretary in the City Hall at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Suite the ination ofng Officer
f rice shall be final.
91765. If no appeal is filed within the
notice and prescribed,
the de er recorded against the property in the Office of
You are further advised that
the County Recorder.
DATED: This day of
19 --
Hearing Officer
24
May 2, 1994
the Planning Commission, or City Council, if applicable. Otherwise, all
objections to such decision shall be deemed waived.
22.54.420 Abatement of public nuisances by the city.
(A) If the owner(s), agent of the owner, lessee, occupant, entity,
or person in possession of the property who may be served with a notice
and order shall fail to take action as required by the notice and order
within the time therein specified, or as extended by the Planning
Commission, or City Council, if applicable, and in accordance with the
provisions of this Chapter, the City Manager shall take action as
specified in the notice and order to abate the public nuisance existing
on the property.
(B) Abatement of the public nuisance may, at the discretion of the
City Manager be performed by city forces or the City prosecutor or by a
private contractor engaged by the city pursuant to the provisions of this
code.
(C) Notwithstanding compliance with the notice and order, the
owner(s), and any other persons having an interest in the property
described in the notice, shall in all events be jointly and severally
liable for all costs incurred by the city in securing such compliance.
Moneys due the city pursuant to this subsection may be recovered in an
appropriate court in the same manner that abatement costs are recovered
pursuant to this Chapter.
22.54.430 Abatement of imminently dangerous public nuisances.
Whenever the City Manager or his duly authorized representative
determines that a public nuisance is so imminently dangerous to life or
adjacent property that such condition must be immediately removed,
M9y 2, 1994 2 6
repaired or isolated, the City Manager shall notify all appropriate
public safety agencies and implement the following procedures:
(A) Notice. The City Manager shall attempt to make contact through
a personal interview, or by telephone, with the owner(s) of the property
or the person, if any, occupying or otherwise in real or apparent charge
and control thereof. In the event such contact is made, the City Manager
shall notify such person, or persons, of the danger involved and require
that such condition be immediately removed, repaired or isolated so as to
preclude harm to any person or property.
(B) Abatement. If the City Manager is unable to make contact as
herein above noted, or if the appropriate persons, after notification by
the City Manager or his/her designee do not take action within such time
as may be specified by such official, then the City Manager may take all
actions deemed necessary to remove, repair, or isolate such dangerous
condition or conditions, with the use of City or other public or private
forces or a city prosecutor or contractor engaged pursuant to the
provisions of this Code.
22.54.440 Account of abatement costs.
(A) The City Manager in conjunction with the finance director,
shall keep an itemized account of all costs incurred by the city in the
abatement of any public nuisance under this chapter. Such costs may
include, but are not limited to, any and all direct costs and expenses
related to such items as investigation, boundary determination,
measurement, personnel salaries and benefits, operational overhead, fees
for experts or consultants, legal costs or expenses, including attorney's
fees, claims against the city arising as a consequence of the public
May 2, 1994 2 7
nuisance, clerical and administrative cost, and procedures associated
with collecting moneys due hereunder.
(B) Upon completion of the abatement work, the City Manager or
his/her designee shall prepare a report specifying the work done, the
itemized costs of the work necessary to abate the public nuisance, a
description of the property involved, and the names and addresses of the
persons entitled to notice pursuant to this Chapter. Any such report may
include costs on any number of properties, whether or not contiguous to
each other, and whether or not under the same ownership. The report
shall be filed with the City Clerk.
22.54.450 Procedure for special assessment
(A) Hearing Notice. Within ten days after the filing of the report
referred to herein, the Planning Commission secretary shall fix a time
and place for hearing and passing upon the report. The City Clerk shall
cause notice of the proposed assessment, as set forth in the report, to
be given to the owner(s) in the manner specified herein. Such notice
shall contain a description of the property sufficient to enable the
persons served to identify it, and shall specify the day, hour, and place
when the Planning Commission will hear and pass upon the report, together
with any objections or protests which may be raised by any persons liable
to be assessed for the costs of such abatement. Notice of the hearing
shall be given not less than fifteen (15) days prior to time fixed by the
City Clerk for the hearing, and shall also be published once, at least
fifteen days prior to the date of the hearing, in a newspaper of general
circulation published in the community.
May 2, 1994 2 8
(B) Protests. Any interested person may file a written protest with
the City Clerk at any time prior to the time set for the hearing on the
report of the City Manager. Each such protest shall contain a
description of the property in which the person signing the protest is
interested and the grounds of such protest. The City Clerk shall endorse
on every such protest the date and time of filing, and shall present such
protest to the Planning Commission, or City Council, if applicable, at
the time set for hearing.
22.54.460 Hearing on proposed special assessment.
Upon the day and hour fixed for the hearing, the Planning
Commission shall consider the report of the Code Enforcement Official,
together with any protests which have been filed with the Planning
Commission Secretary. The Planning Commission may make such revisions,
corrections, or modifications in the report as it may deem just, and when
the Planning Commission is satisfied with the correctness of the
assessment, the report and the proposed assessment, as submitted, or as
revised, corrected, or modified, shall be confirmed by resolution. The
decision of the Planning Commission, or City Council, if applicable, on
the report and the assessment and on all protests shall be final and
conclusive, unless appealed to the City Council. The Planning Commission
may continue the hearing from time to time as it deems necessary.
22.54.470 Contest of special assessment.
. The validity of any assessment levied under the provisions of
this Chapter shall not be contested in any action or proceeding unless
such action or proceeding is commenced within thirty days after the
assessment is confirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. All
M8y 2, 1994 29
interested persons shall be given notice of the final determination and
the time limitation for judicial review.
22.54.480 Notice of lien --- Form and contents
(A) Notice of Lien. Immediately upon confirmation of the
assessment by the Planning commission, the City Clerk shall execute and
file in the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder a certificate in
substantially the following form set forth in Exhibit B.
May 2, 1994 3 0
Exhibit B
Example of Notice
"NOTICE OF LIEN
Pursuant to the authority vested in the City Manager by the Provisions of of the
Diamond Bar Municipal Code, on or about the _day of . 19_, abated the public nuisance upon the
real property commonly known as (address) by taking the following actions (s):
The same has not been paid nor any part thereof, and the City of Diamond Bar does hereby claim a lien on the
real property for the net expense of the doing of the abatement in the amount of $ , and this amount
shall be a lien upon the real property until the sum of $ , with interest at the rate of six percent
(6%) per annum from , 19_, has been paid in full and discharged of record.
The real property herein before mentioned, and upon which a lien is claimed, is that certain parcel of land
in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and legally described as follows:
(DESCRIPTION)
Dated: this day of 19_.
FINANCE MANAGER, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
(ACKNOWLEDGEMENT)"
May 2, 1994 3 1
(B) Recordation. Immediately upon the recording of the notice
of lien the assessment shall constitute a lien on the real property
assessed.
22.54.490 Procedures for collection with regular taxes
(A) Assessment Book. After recording, the Finance Director
shall deliver the notice of lien to the auditor of Los Angeles County,
who shall enter the amount on the county assessment book opposite the
description of the particular property, and the amount shall be collected
together with all other taxes against the property.
(B) Collection. The amount set forth in the notice of lien
shall thereafter be collected as the same time and in the same manner as
ordinary city taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same
penalties and interest and to the same procedure under foreclosure and
sale in case of delinquency to the levy, collection and enforcement of
city taxes are made applicable to such assessment.
(C) Refunds. The Planning Commission may recommend a refund
of all or part of the assessment paid pursuant to this Chapter if it
finds that all or part of the assessment was erroneously levied. An
assessment or part thereof shall not be refunded unless a claim is filed
with the Planning Commission Secretary within six months after the
assessment became due and payable. The claim shall be verified by the
person who paid the assessment, or the legal representative of such
person.
22.54.500 Remedies of private parties
The provisions of this Chapter shall in no manner adversely
affect the right of the owner(s), lessee, or occupant of any such
May 2, 1994 32
property to recover all costs and expenses imposed by this Chapter from
any person responsible for creating or maintaining the public nuisance.
22.54.510 Right of entry
(A) Shall be governed by all applicable State and Federal law.
(B) It shall be unlawful for any person(s), including an owner(s),
agent of the owner(s), lessee or anyone in possession of any
property within the City to refuse to allow the Code Enforcement
official, or a contractor engaged by the city, consistent with this
ordinance, to enter upon the property at any time during the hours
of daylight for the purpose of the abatement of a public nuisance or
to obstruct, impede or interfere in any manner with the Code
Enforcement Official, or a contractor engaged by the city, in any
work undertaken pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.
22.54.520 Continuing violations.
eemply with, any provision or requ4r_ement -_-f 1-6-1049 Gede is eeamit ed,
It shall constitute a continuing
violation unless and until the violation is abated and shall be punished
accordingly.
22.54.530 Penalty for violation
No person shall violate or.fail to comply with any provision or
requirement of this Code. Any person who shall violate or fail to comply
with any provision or requirement of this Code shall be guilty of a
May 2, 1994 3 3
misdemeanor. However, any provision of this Code may be prosecuted as an
infraction at the discretion of the Prosecuting Attorney.
22.54.540 Injunction
The provisions of this Chapter may be enforced by an injunction
issued by any court having jurisdiction over the suit or the owner(s) or
occupant of any real property affected by such violations or prospective
violation."
22.54.550 Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences,
clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional."
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be posted in three (3) public places within
the City of Diamond Bar pursuant to Resolution No. 89-6.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1994.
Mayor
May 2, 1994 3 4
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar, do
s introduced at a regular
certify that the foregoing
Ordinance wa
hereby
meeting of the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the
at a regular
1994 and was finally passed
day of '
meeting of the City Council.
City Clerk
35
May 2, 1994
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. �' ;3
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994 REPORT DATE: April 26, 1994
FROM: David G. Liu, Senior Engineer
TITLE: Intersection Modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar Boulevard and of Golden Springs Drive
SUMMARY: On October 6, 1992, the City Council awarded a design services contract to Dwight French and
Associates, Inc. (DFA) for the reconstruction/rehabilitation of Grand Avenue from the easterly City limit to
Golden Springs Drive in the amount of $45,700.00. On December 7, 1993, the City of Diamond Bar executed
a Memorandum of Understanding with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)
for the approved funding of our Grand Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization/Arterial Improvements Project.
Since the arterial improvements/intersection modification should be constructed as part of the Grand Avenue
Rehabilitation Project, it has become necessary for DFA to design/co-ordinate this effort.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a
contract amendment with Dwight French and Associate, Inc. to increase the contract amount from $45,700.00
to $61,000.00.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: -A Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
_ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's office)
_ Ordinances(s) X Other: (ATTACHMENTS 1-5)
_ Agreement(s) Interoffice Memorandum:
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
_ Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
_ Yes X No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
X Yes _ No
Which Commission? Traffic & Transportation
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
_Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
errence L. Belanger Frank M. Usher vi G. Liu
City Manager Assistant City Manager Senior Engineer
c:\wp6O\iodekay\egenda-9\gmdave.503
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Intersection Modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar Boulevard
and at Golden Springs Drive
ISSUE STATEMENT
To increase the contract amount from $45,700 to $61,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract
amendment with Dwight French and Associates, Inc. to increase the contract amount from
$45,700 to $61,000.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding executed between Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the City of Diamond Bar
(ATTACHMENT #1) for the Grand Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization/Arterial
Improvements Project, the increased amount of $15,300.00 will be funded by Proposition C
Fund (67.5 % share) and our Local Gas Tax Funds (32.5 % share).
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On October 6, 1992, the City Council awarded a design services contract to Dwight French
and Associates (DFA) for the reconstruction/rehabilitation of Grand Avenue from the easterly
City Limit to Golden Springs Drive in the amount of $45,700.00.
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is responsible for
administering a number of different federal, state, and locally enacted transportation
Programs to improve mobility, reduce congestion, and to assist in the improvement of air
quality. On January 29, 1993, the MTA issued a Multi -Year Call For Projects. The City of
Diamond Bar submitted the Grand Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization/Arterial
Improvements Project and was successful in obtaining the funding for this project. The work
includes traffic data collection, generation/implementation of timing plans, development of
plans, specifications, and estimate (PS & E) for the synchronization of nine (9) traffic signals
INTERSECTION MODIFICATION ON GRAND AVENUE AT
DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
May 3, 1994
PAGE 2
along Grand Avenue (from State Route 57 to the easterly City limit) and intersection
modifications of Grand Avenue/Diamond Bar Boulevard and Grand Avenue/Golden Springs
Drive.
To maximize available resources, staff was able to request assistance from the Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works to provide the synchronization design at no cost to the
City (Attachment #2). With respect to the design for the intersection modification, it has
become necessary to request DFA to co-ordinate said effort as part of the Grand Avenue
Rehabilitation Project.
Dwight French and Associates has submitted a proposal for the intersection modification
(ATTACHMENT #3) as requested by the City.
The objectives of the intersection modification will be to optimize traffic circulation and to
improve the level of service at these two intersections. As presented to the Traffic and
Transportation Commission on February 10, 1994, the following will be the key options to
be considered:
I. ON GRAND AVENUE AT DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD
(ATTACHMENT #4)
• Easterly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Relocate the curb and gutter approximately 2' back (current parkway
width is 8') for approximately 550' on either the northerly side or both
sides of Grand Avenue. This modification could either provide a third
through lane or a right -tum lane for northbound traffic.
(b) Relocate the existing median further south to improve the traffic flow
and modify said median to provide greater storage capacity (by
approximately 250') for left-turn/southbound traffic.
(c) Continue to permit left -turn movement into the shopping center
(Vineyard).
• Westerly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Relocate the curb and gutter 2' back (current parkway width is 8') for
approximately 300' on either the southerly side or both sides of Grand
Avenue. This modification could either provide a third through lane or
INTERSECTION MODIFICATION ON GRAND AVENUE AT
DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
May, 1994
PAGE 3
a right -turn lane for the southbound traffic.
(b) Relocate the existing median further north to improve the traffic flow.
Preliminary Engineer's Estimate: $193,000 - $291,000
II. ON GRAND AVENUE AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
(ATTACHMENT #5)
0 Easterly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Lengthen and accommodate dual left -turn pockets for southbound
traffic. This would result in the removallrelocation of two mature trees
currently in the median island.
• Westerly Approach of Grand Avenue
(a) Relocatelmodify existing median to create a dual left -turn pocket for
the northbound traffic.
• Southerly Approach of Golden Springs Drive:
(a) Relocate existing easterly curbs and gutter approximately 12' for
approximately 400' to accommodate the left -turn movements from
Grand Avenue and to accommodate the right -turn lane.
Preliminary Engineer's Estimate: $175,000
Upon completion of the intersection modification design, the plans will be incorporated as
part of the Grand Avenue Rehabilitation Project to be approved by the City Council.
Prepared By:
David G. Liu
C:\WP60\LINDAKAY\CCR-94\GRNDAVE.503
.�% 7�fC�'/Ylev T /
MOU #217-246-2-93-94
PROPOSITION C
TRAI\iSIT RELATED STREET/STATE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS (PROP. C 25%)
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into by and between the
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA") and the City of
Diamond Bar ("Grantee").
WHEREAS, as part of the FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects, the MTA, at its June,
30, 1993 meeting, authorized a grant to Grantee, subject to the terms and conditions
contained in this MOU.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:
The terms and conditions of this MOU consist of the following and each is incorporated by
reference herein as if fully set forth herein:
1. Part I - Specific Terms of the MOU
2. Part II - General Terms of the MOU
3. Attachment A - the Project Budget
4. Attachment B - the Cash Flow Plan
5. Attachment C - the Scope of Work
6. Attachment D - Special Grant Conditions
7. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents
In the event of a conflict, the Specific Terms of the MOU shall prevail over the General
Terms of the MOU.
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects
Understanding (MOU) - Memorandum of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below:
MTA:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
-- ."-11U.1V1_ vJuccr
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dewitt W. Clinton
County Counsel
By:
p t Date
GRANTEE:
By: f , 44- Q D /-V7/,g5
'GARY G. MILLER Date
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FOR
By:
ANDREW V. ARC NSKI Date
City Attorney
2
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU)
PART I
SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE NIOU
1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): Grand Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization
Arterial Improvements Project.
2. To the extent the Funds (the "Funds") are available, MTA shall make to Grantee a
one time grant of the Funds in the amount of: Two Hundred Eighty Thousand
Dollars ($280,000). MTA Board action of June 30, 1993 programmed funds to
Grantee for the Project for one year, Fiscal Year (FY) 1993-94. However, Funds
are approved for FY 1993-94 only. MTA Board action will be required annually to
approve Funds for each subsequent Fiscal Year prior to those Funds being allocated
to Grantee.
3. This one time grant shall be disbursed in accordance with the cash flow plan, over
a thirteen (13) month period, beginning in the month that costs are incurred as
specified in the Plan, as defined herein, for each Fiscal Year for which funds are
approved (as specified in Part I, Section 2 of this MOU). MTA shall withhold, as
retainage, ten percent (10%) of the total grant amount until MTA review and
approval of annual audit results (as specified in Part II, Section 4.3 of this MOU).
MTA shall release retainage to Grantee, on an annual basis, upon MTA approval of
annual audit results. All disbursements of Funds shall be considered an estimate
subject to adjustment based on Quarterly Cost. Certification reports (as specified in
Part II, Section 4.1 of this MOU) and MTA audit results.
4. Reports and Certifications to be submitted to MTA by Grantee (check below):
Transit Performance Measurement Report
Financial Capacity Certification demonstrating current and future financial
capacity to sustain all new operating costs
Certification of Coordination with other affected Transit Operators to avoid
potential service duplication
Compliance with FTA Section 15 reporting, requirements
X Annual Project evaluation and financial review report (due: June 30 1994 )
X Quarterly narrative update on Project progress
Other:
N
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU)
5. Project Budget (the "Project Budget") for the sources of funds programmed for the
Project is attached to this MOU as Attachment A.
6. Cash Flow Plan (the "Plan") for the Project is attached to this MOU as Attachment
B.
7. Scope of Work (the "Scope of Work") for the Project is attached to this MOU as
Attachment C.
8. Special Grant Conditions for the Project, if any, are attached to this MOU as
Attachment D.
9. No material changes, as determined by the MTA at its sole discretion, to the Project
Budget, the Plan, or the Scope of Work shall be funded or allowed without the prior
written consent of the MTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee.
10. MTA's Address:
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
818 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA. 90017
Attention: Mr. Benkin Jones San Gabriel Vallev Area Team
11. Grantee's Address:
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Conley Drive Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Attention: Mr. David Liu Public Works
4
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
PART II
GENERAL TERMS OF THE MOU
1. TERM. The term of this MOU shall commence on June 30, 1993 and, subject to Part
II, Section 7, shall terminate upon Project Completion. For purposes of this MOU, Project
Completion is defined as the time at which the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed,
all MTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied, and the final disbursement of the
Funds has been made to the Grantee.
2. INVOICE BY GRANTEE. Unless otherwise stated in this MOU, the Quarterly Cost
Certification reports and the annual Project Status report, as described in Part II, Sections 4.1
and 4.2 of this MOU, shall satisfy MTA invoicing requirements.
3. USE OF FUNDS.
3.1 The Grantee shall utilize the Funds in accordance with the most recently
adopted MTA Proposition C Guidelines (the "Guidelines") and as specified in the Scope of
Work.
3.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between
MTA and the Grantee for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this MOU, can only be used
towards the completion of this Scope of Work.
3.3 Grantee shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects
not specified in this MOU.
4. REPORTING AND AUDIT REO S/PAYNEENT ADJUSTMENTS.
4.1 Grantee shall submit Quarterly Cost Certification reports on the last day
of the months of October, January, April, and July. Should Grantee fail to submit such reports
within 10 days of the due date, MTA may withhold, at its sole discretion, the Funds from
Grantee. MTA will reconcile Quarterly Cost Certification reports to Funds disbursements on
a quarterly basis. All disbursements shall be considered an estimate subject to adjustment based
on this reconciliation. Future disbursement of Funds may be reduced and/or delayed if actual
Project costs, as provided in the Quarterly Cost Certification reports, are significantly less than
Fund disbursements.
4.2 Grantee shall submit an annual Project Status report one month after the
end of each funded Fiscal Year. Should Grantee fail to submit such report within 10 days of
the date, MTA may withhold, at its sole discretion, the Funds from Grantee.
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
4.3 MTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct a financial and
compliance audit(s) of the Project. Grantee agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting
procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Grantee shall reimburse MTA for any expenditures not in
compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions
as defined by this MOU and the Guidelines.
5. ONE TIME GRANT. This is a one time only grant subject to the terms and conditions
agreed to herein and in the Guidelines. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future
funding commitment on the part of MTA.
6. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS.
6.1 Grantee shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project.
6.2 Grantee shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified
in Part I, Section 2 of this MOU subject to the terms and conditions contained herein and in the
Guidelines. Any underruns to the Project Budget shall be apportioned between MTA and the
Grantee in the same proportion as the Sources of Funds from each party to this MOU as
specified in Attachment A to this MOU.
6.3 Grantee, within 60 days of completion of the Project described in the
Scope of Work, shall return to MTA any unused disbursements of the Funds previously
transferred to the Grantee provided that, to the extent such unused funds represent underruns to
the Project Budget, such funds shall be apportioned between MTA and Grantee in the manner
specified in Part II, Section 6.2 of this MOU.
7. PROTECT RECERTIFICATION / LAPSING OF FUNDS
7.1 This MOU must be executed between MTA and Grantee within the first
six (6) months of the first Fiscal Year in which Funds are programmed for the Project.
7.2 Grantee must demonstrate timely use of Funds through the submittal of
Quarterly Cost Certification reports as described in Part II, Section 4.1 of this MOU.
7.3 Projects for which the timely use of Funds is not demonstrated by the
execution of this MOU by December 31, 1993, and through the Quarterly Cost Certification
reports, will be reevaluated, by MTA as part of its annual Call for Projects Recertification
process, for reprogramming to subsequent Fiscal Years.
rel
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
7.4
MTA Board action will be taken on the Call for Projects Recertification
Prior to July 1 of each Fiscal Year.
7.5 Grantee shall expend the FY 1993-94 Funds granted under this MOU by
June 30, 1996, three (3) years from the date of approval, unless otherwise stated in this MOU.
At the end of the three (3) year period Grantee shall return any funds not expended to MTA
by July 31, 1996.
8• DEF__ AULT. A Default under this MOU is defined as anyone or more of the following:
(i) Grantee fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein or in the Guidelines;
or (ii) Grantee makes a material change, as determined by MTA at its sole discretion, to the
Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Budget without MTA's prior written consent or
approval as provided herein.
9. REMEDIES.
9.1 In the event of a Default by Grantee, MTA shall provide written notice of
such Default to Grantee with a 30 -day period to cure the Default. In the event Grantee fails to
cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30 day
period to the satisfaction of MTA, MTA shall have the following remedies: (i) MTA may
terminate this MOU; (ii) MTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to the Grantee;
and/or (iii) MTA may recover from Grantee any Funds disbursed to Grantee prior to and after
the Default.
9.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from MTA, Grantee
shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this M
MTA in writing. OU unless so directed tby
o
9.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. MTA shall have the
right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter
available at law or in equity.
10. OTAER TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
10.1 This MOU, along with the Guidelines, constitutes the entire understanding
between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The MOU shall not be amended,
nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the piesAdoption
of revisions or supplements to the Guidelines by MTA shall. cause such revisions or supplements
to become incorporated automatically into this MOU as though fully set forth herein.
►/
MTA FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
10.2 In the event that there is any legal proceeding between the parties to
t protect or establish any rights or remedies
enforce or interPret this MOU, shy Guidelines, i s costs and expenses, including reasonable
hereunder, the prevailing party
attorneys' fees.
10.3 Grantee shall retain all original records and documents related to the work
herein for a period of three (3) years after Project Completion.
10.4 Neither MTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for
ung by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Grantee
any damage or liability work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to Grantee under this
under or in connection with any that Grantee shall fully indemnify and
MOU or the Guidelines. It is also understood and agreed son of anything done
hold MTA harmless from any liability impo for injury occurring by reunder or in Connection with ason
work, authority, or
or omitted to be done by Gunder this MOU or the Guidelines*
jurisdiction delegated to Grantee
10.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of
its obligation hereunder to the extent that the
performance of any such obligation is prevented
and
or delayed by unforeseen causes inclulit
ding acts li God, of the affectedpublic � yEach Party hereto
acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence
shall give notice promptly to the other of the na of an obligations ure and extent of under this MOUy such or the
claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performanCe y
Guidelines.
10.6 Grantee shall comply 1 with and insure that work performed
under this MOU
and
local laws) statute-Sv
is done in compliance with all applicable provisions
of nede the applicabl requirements and
ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural require Copies of and
regulations of the MTA. Grantee acknowledges responsibility for obtaining tions and
complying with the terms of the most recent
federal,
stale, or
ocallaws
federal, state, or local
MTM requirements including any amendments
regulations and MTA requirements are applicable to this MOU to the maximum extent
laws and regi
feasible, unless otherwise provided for in writing by the MTA.
10.7 Grantee agrees that the requirements of this MOU and the Guidelines shall
be included, as applicable, in every subcontract entered into by Grantee or its contractors
relating to work performed under this MOU.
10.8 Grantee shall not assign this MOU, or any part thereof, without written
consent and prior approval of the MTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee, and any
assignment without said consent shall be void and unenforceable.
MTA
FY 1993-94 Multi -Year Call for Projects - Memorandum of Understanding (MOLD)
10.9 This MOU shall be governed by California law-
If any provision of this
jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
MOU is held by a court of CompetentJ
Provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or
remaining p
invalidated in any way.
10.10 The covenants and agreements of this MO e s �so� and asbegnst of,
and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respects
10.11 Grantee agrees that all literature, advertisements,
brochures, video, radio,
the
and public
service announcements, construction site signs, and all
a t the MTA�� Abu on as
project and/or distributed to the public will contain to display �e SRO logo on its buses,
well as the approved METRO logo. Grantee agrees, The MP; I RO logo
for services provided under the Proj
shuttle buses, vans, and taxis utilized reproduced and displayed in accordance with speck
is a copyrighted symbol which shall be rep ent at the address in Part 1, Section
graphic guidelines available from the MTA Graphics Department Department to
10 of this MOU. Grantee agrees to follow directions of the MTA Marketing
n of the MOU.
comply with this SectioPartnership programs to seek State /Local Transportation Parte P
10.12 Grantee agree rnia for the Project. SLTPP funds received by the
funds (SLTPP) from the State of Califo
een the Grantee and MTA in the manner
Grantee for the Project shall be apportioned betw
specified in part 11, Section 6.2 of this MOU.
parties at the in Part I,
10.13 Notice will be given to the p e address specie of address.
Sections 10 and 11 unless otherwise notified in writing of chang
6
Q
H
z
w
2
U
Q
F-
F -
Q
s
O
2
rn
C_
a
C
d
a
c
0
E
:
a
C
CO
E
L v/
I ❑
z
N
U LL
d LL
o O
d V)
O W
0 U
cr
Z)
00
� I
}
UJ
0
Z)
CV)
rn
c+) U
rn w
�O
Ir
Il
❑
z
Z)
LL
W
O
W
U
D
O
co
0 0 0
o o Ln o
0 T N v
LL U U U U
E _o 0 0 0
Ro o o o
m a a a a
0
0 0 0
ti <i IL
Q
C
o
ry
E
E
E to
O
U
rn
c c
r a
c
W cu
m o
d J
C
0
F -
w
U
❑
m
U
w
O
a.
J
Q
H
O
H
o
L
N
O
O
LL.
LO
O
N
O
cfl
o
0 -
co
0
0
0
0
[—
O
J LLl
O
O ❑
t1i
i[i
co
M
~ m
64
ER
to
O
(
m
}T
LL.
(D
C)
I
u)
rn
O)
T
0
0
0
Ln
0
0
0
O)
T
T
1
LO
co
co
c}
CA
O 0
O
CC)
O
Lc
O
n
co
EA
�
to
0
rn
4
0
0
o
1
CO
T
rn
ao
rn
O
❑
z
Z)
LL
W
O
W
U
D
O
co
0 0 0
o o Ln o
0 T N v
LL U U U U
E _o 0 0 0
Ro o o o
m a a a a
0
0 0 0
ti <i IL
Q
C
o
ry
E
E
E to
O
U
rn
c c
r a
c
W cu
m o
d J
C
0
F -
w
U
❑
m
U
w
O
a.
J
Q
H
O
H
FY 1993-94 Multi—Year Call For Projects
Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU)
^ ATTACHMENT B
^ PROPOSITION C
PROJECT CASH FLOW PLAN
AGENCY NAME: City of Diamond Bar
PROJECT NAME: Grand Ave. Traff Signal Synchronization/Arterial Improvements Project
FUNDING SOURCES:
$280,000.00
PROPOSITION C $135,000.00
OTHER LOCAL FUNDS
(incl. ISTEA, etc.)
$415,000.00
TOTAL FUNDING
PROJECTED MONTHLY PROPOSITION C CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS:
FY 94-95
FY 93-94
Month: .
Month:
July 1994
$13,500.00
$
$27,950.00
August
$30,000.00
September
$45,000.00
October
$20,000.00
November
$20,000.00
December
$22,400.00
January 1995
January 1994 $20,150.00
February $26,000.00
March $20,000.00
Ap ril $15,000.00
May $10,000.00
June $10,000.00
$178,850.00
Fiscal Year Total $101,150.00
(2)
(1)
FOR FIRST TWO FISCAL YEARS (1)+(2)
00.00
$280,0$0.00
CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS
FOR FUTURE YEARS (3)
CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS PROGRAMMED
C GRANT AMOUNT (1)+(2)+(3)
$280,000.00
TOTAL PROPOSITION
Note:
Although the MTA Board action of June 30, 199; may have programmed funds on a multi—year
FY 1993-94 only. MTA Board action will be required annually
basis, funds are approved for the
ior to those funds being allocated to the grantee.
approve funds for each subsequent fiscal year pr
ATTACHMENT C
PROPOSITION C 25% FUNDS MOU
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT CATEGORY
SECTION I: SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This regional arterial, Grand Avenue, connecting Los Angeles technology
logy SwBernardino ine
County is to be synchronized using radioscorrected modifications: replacement, signal
(9) intersections. Work will include
equipment replacement, channelization modifications
and at GrandpA e/Golden Springs eing to create dual fRoad
lanes on Grand Ave/Diamond Bar Boulevard
Restriping to create a three (3) thru/right turn lanes in eadata ch direction on generation and
ic
p
through the project limits. Other woo o tcl Plans,:traf Specificarions and Estimate (PS &
implementation of timing plans,
E) for the WW1 work and the intersection modifications, and construction engineering.
PROJECT LOCATION
The attached map (Exhibit 1) delineates the project limits (approximately two miles) along
Grand Avenue from State Route 57 to the East City Limits.
PROJECT BUDGET
Source of Funds: $280,000
Proposition C 25%
Local Gas Tax Subvention Funds $415,000
Total
Use of Funds: ,000
Engineering Design (PS & E) $ 33 3, 000
Constructi$3
on 52,000
Construction Engineering $
Traffic Data and Timing Plans $� .
Total
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
timize
The project objectives are to optraffic circulation,
he overall effect of reducing fuel usage
intersections, and reduce travel time delay ,
and vehicle air pollutant emissions along the corridor.
PROJECT MLESTONES
STANDARDS AND PRACTICES
The Cy Angeles
it will ensure the Project is designed in accordance with
. applicable City, Los Ano
County Department of Public Works and Caltrans Standards.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
None regiured by MTA.
SECTION II; LINE ITEM BUDGET
January 1994
Begin Project Design
January 1994
Begin Traffic Studies royal
PS & E App
May 1994
City Council
June 1994
Bid Opening
June 1994
Contract Award
June 1994
"Before" Studies
July 1994
Begin Construction
October 1994
Complete Construction
November 1994
Implement Timing Plans
December 1994
Complete Traffic Studies
February 1995
"After" Studies
STANDARDS AND PRACTICES
The Cy Angeles
it will ensure the Project is designed in accordance with
. applicable City, Los Ano
County Department of Public Works and Caltrans Standards.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
None regiured by MTA.
SECTION II; LINE ITEM BUDGET
SECTION III: SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES
Locations and Types of Improvements (Exhibit 2)May 1994
PS & E November 1994
Timing Plans March 1995
Traffic Studies Report April 1995
Field Review
$ 33,000
Design Plan
Traffic Studies &Timing an Devel.
15,000
52,000
Construction Engineering
30,000
Synchronization Equipment
95,000
Grand/Golden Springs Construction
1 90.000
1S
uction
Grand/Diamond Ba ConstrTotal
0
SECTION III: SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES
Locations and Types of Improvements (Exhibit 2)May 1994
PS & E November 1994
Timing Plans March 1995
Traffic Studies Report April 1995
Field Review
ATTACHMENT C
EXHIBIT
F—
U
w
3
O
a
z
w
w
O
a
z
x
x
x
------------
0~w
w�Z
a -g xxxxxxxxx
��
U)�cr
w=Z)
cl: F- �-
z
LL o
w
J
LLJ
J —i
x
x
D Z
cr�
O�
C)
H
z
w
U)
aZZ
Dw0
�w Q
x
x
JUL)
z
Q
��0
H
z
w
Ow
}-U
05�
xxxxxxxxx
d
LU
¢
CCO
z
J
O,
O
U w
w
a
J
Ozm0za-
Z
w >W¢co
z
Y
z<
U)
H
<
CC
W=z
(9
z
O
JO~CnQ
J
Z
J
z~�
O�=OQOo0m
-�C�
JU)Cncr-
p
co0z
1
J `, 4�LA7�1
r
-�C
C---
r
BOARD OF SUPER ISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
822 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
Telephone (213) 974.4444 I FAX (213) 626-6941
DEANE DANA
January 19, 1994 SUPERVISOR, FOURTH DISTRICT
Honorable Gary Werner
Mayor, City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 •` /V`'
Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177
Dear Gary:
GRAND AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT
The County Director of Public Works informed me of the letter
from your City Manager, Mr. Terrance Belanger, indicating your
City' -s success in obtaining a grant from the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority to synchronize the
traffic signals along Grand Avenue and proposing that the
County provide design services at no cost to the City. I have
discussed the project with the Director and concur that it is
of general County interest.
As you know, Grand Avenue was recently added to the County's
Second Five -Year Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and is
eligible for partial County funding. Therefore, I would be
happy to offer County design services at no cost to your City.
Accordingly, I have instructed the Director to work with your
staff so that design can begin immediately in order to meet
your construction schedule.
It is always a pleasure to work with you on these regional
traffic mitigation measures. I look forward to the success of
this project.
Sincerely,
DEANE DANA
Supervisor, Fourth District
County of Los Angeles
DD: as
cc: T. A. Tidemanson, Director
Department of Public Works
r
-�C
C---
r
�z
n
m
The County Director of Public Works informed me of the letter
from your City Manager, Mr. Terrance Belanger, indicating your
City' -s success in obtaining a grant from the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority to synchronize the
traffic signals along Grand Avenue and proposing that the
County provide design services at no cost to the City. I have
discussed the project with the Director and concur that it is
of general County interest.
As you know, Grand Avenue was recently added to the County's
Second Five -Year Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and is
eligible for partial County funding. Therefore, I would be
happy to offer County design services at no cost to your City.
Accordingly, I have instructed the Director to work with your
staff so that design can begin immediately in order to meet
your construction schedule.
It is always a pleasure to work with you on these regional
traffic mitigation measures. I look forward to the success of
this project.
Sincerely,
DEANE DANA
Supervisor, Fourth District
County of Los Angeles
DD: as
cc: T. A. Tidemanson, Director
Department of Public Works
ATTACHMENT #3
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE CITY'S PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATI,ON OF
GRAND AVENUE FROM EASTERLY CITY LIMIT TO GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
This Amendment No. 1 to the City's Professional Services
Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,
1994, between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
(hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals•
(i) The CITY has heretofore entered into an agreement,
with Dwight French & Associates to provide professional
engineering services with respect to reconstruction/rehabilitation
of Grand Avenue from Easterly City limit to Golden Springs Drive,
dated October 6, 1992 ("SAID AGREEMENT" hereinafter).
(ii) The CITY has requested that the intersection
modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar Boulevard and on Grand
Avenue at Golden Springs Drive be included into the AGREEMENT.
(iii) CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal ("PROJECT"
hereinafter), a full, true and correct copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" to provide design services for the
intersection modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar Boulevard
and at Golden Springs Drive at a cost of $15,300.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT:
B. Amendment to Agreement:
Section B: Subsection 2(a) is hereby amended to read in
words and figures, as follows:
112(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and
complete the project in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" hereto
and all in accordance with applicable Federal, State and CITY
statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the
reasonable satisfaction of CITY and in accordance with the standard
of care normally provided by practitioners of the engineering
profession."
Section B: Subsection 3(a) of the original agreement is
hereby amended as follows:
113(a) To pay consultant a maximum sum of Sixty
One Thousand dollars and no cents ($61,000.00) for the performance
of the services required by the original agreement and the
supplemental agreement."
Each party to this Supplemental Agreement acknowledges that no
representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any
other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this
Supplemental Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any
modification of this Supplemental Agreement shall be effective only
if it is in writing signed by the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Supplemental Agreement as of the day and year first set forth
above:
CONSULTANT:
DWIGHT FRENCH AND ASSOCIATES
John Whitman
President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
City Attorney City Manager
DATE:
C:\WP60\LINDAKAY\AGREE-94\DFAAMD-1.419
April 14, 1994
Mr. David G. Liu
Senior Engineer
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Drive
Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Subject: Engineering Services for Two Intersections -
ive Grand Avenue and Diamond den Bra gBoulevard d
ins Dr
Grand Avenue and
WIGHT
RENO
ASSOCIATES
E■an�
Dear David:
Based on our telephone conversation on Monday, March 28, 1994, Dwight French &
is pleased to present this proposal for engineering services at the
Associates, Inc. (DFA)
two subject intersections. the following tasks.
Our understanding of the work necessary is represented by
TASK 1
CONCEPTUAL STRIPING PLAN Ian for both intersections for City to
DFA will develop conceptual striping p
review and comment.
TASK 2
DEVELOP PRELIMINARY STRIPING PLAN ase on City's review comments
DFA will develop preliminary striping plan
and submit to the City.
We understand the City will forward this information
the traffic signal design person.
TASK 3
DEVELOP INTERSECTION IMPROVETask 1 and 2, ENT PLAN we will develop the
Based on the results generated
intersection improvement plan.
y Suite 140, Diamond Bar, California
1470 South Valle91765
Vista Drive, a
■ (909) 860-3566 I'as No. () 860-3476 ■
---_-- _ —
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
TASK 4
PERFORM HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS & DEVELOP STORM DRAIN PLAN
Based on the intersection plan, we will relocate the catch basin, perform
hydrologic analysis and develop storm drain plan per Los Angeles County
Standards.
EED
FINALIZE STRIPING & SIGNING PLAN
DFA will finalize striping and signing plan per review comments from the
City.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
Based on the intersection improvement plan and storm drain plan, we will
calculate construction costs and incorporate into the Grand. Avenue Project.
The fixed fee cost by task is as follows:
Task 1
Conceptual Striping Plan
$ 2,040
Task 2
Preliminary Striping Plan
960
Task 3
Intersection Improvement Plan
5,800
Task 4
Hydrologic Analysis and Storm Drain Plan
4,500
Task 5
Finalize Striping & Signing Plan
aoo
Task 6
Construction Cost Estimate
1.200-
TOTAL FEE:
$15,300
If you have any questions or wish to discuss, please call me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
John C. Whitman
\prop1b454rev.hYP
President
I
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TO: ✓Mayor and City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
DATE: April 28, 1994
The attached information is being transmitted for your review. If you should have
any questions, please let me know.
nbw
attachment
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 26, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer
David G. Liu, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Engineering Design Services for the Intersection
Modification on Grand Avenue at Diamond Bar Boulevard and
at Golden Springs Drive
As part of the Grand Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization/Arterial
Improvements Project, the intersections of Grand Avenue/Diamond Bar
Boulevard and Grand Avenue/Golden Springs Drive will be modified in
order to optimize traffic circulation and to improve the level of
service.
The project as proposed would optimize handling of traffic through
the intersections. Staff is not proposing to add any additional
thru lanes on Grand Avenue. Rather, the emphasis will be on
construction changes that would benefit traffic at the
intersection.
The original Grand Avenue Resurfacing Project design was for a
maintenance/overlay project design. This project if completed
requires full redesign of each intersection.
The improvements previously highlighted in the staff report
include:
ON GRAND AV9NUE AT DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD
A. Easterly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Relocate the curb and gutter approximately 2' back for
about 550' on either the northerly side or both sides of
Grand Avenue. This modification could either provide a
third through lane or a right -turn lane for northbound
traffic.,
(b) Relocate the existing median further south to improve the
traffic flow and modify said median to provide greater
storage capacity for left-turn/southbound traffic.
INTERSECTION MODIFICATION
April 26, 1994
Page Two
B. Westerly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Relocate the curb and gutter approximately 2' back for
about 300' on either , tsoutherly oi.icati n could oth leither
Grand Avenue. Ags of
ain,
provide a third through lane or a right -turn lane for the
southbound traffic.
(b) Relocate the existing median further north to improve the
traffic flow.
ON GRAND AVENUE AT GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
A. Easterly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Lengthen and accommodate dual left -turn pockets for
southbound traffic.
B. Westerly Approach of Grand Avenue:
(a) Relocate/modify existing median to create a dual left -
turn pockets for the northbound traffic.
C. Southerly Approach of Golden Springs Drive:
oximately
(a) Relocatet 4 ng to accommodate thasterly curb ande left turnrmove°ments
12 for about 4 00
from Grand Avenue and to accommodate the right -turn lane.
The preliminary engineer'sOOOlande$466r000he At the requestabove nof
improvements is between $368 ,
City staff, Dwight French and Associates has submitted the attached
proposal for the intersection n oGrandn. eAvenuelResurfacing
cation W211
be done and incorporatedas part of the
Project.
The proposed fee of $15,300 is 3-4% of the estimated construction
cost. If approved, this w 611000.1ect a However, itrease in should be hnotedtthat
amount from $45,700 to $61,000.
the original contract amount of $45,700 is for the design services
of Grand Avenue Resurfacing Project.
The synchronization project could be constructed without the
intersection improvements e a ng pro at the intersections posed. However, thiwould add
or at best not mitigate g
estion
Attachment
C:\WP60\LINDAKAY\INTERSEC.MEM
W7GiiT FRENCH & AS,�vCIATES
TASKS
PERFORM HYDROLOGI00 ANALYSIS & DEVELOP STORM DRAIN PLAN
Based on the intersection plan, we will relocate the catch basin, perform
hydrologic analysis and develop storm drain plan per Los Angeles County
Standards.
FINALIZE STRIPING & SIGNING PLAN
DFA will finalize striping and signing plan per review comments from the
City.
TASK 6
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
Based on the intersection improvement plan and storm drain plan, we will
calculate construction costs and incorporate into the Grand Avenue Project.
The fixed fee cost by task is as follows:
Task 1
Conceptual Striping Plan
$ 2,040
Task 2
Preliminary Striping Plan
960
Task 3
Intersection Improvement Plan
5,800
'Task 4
Hydrologic Analysis and Storm Drain Plan
4,500
Task 5
Finalize Striping & Signing Plan
800
Task 6
Construction Cost Estimate
1.200
TOTAL FEE:
$15,300
If you have any questions or wish to discuss, please call me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
John C. Whitman
President
\ xop%4Urev.hyp
April 14, 1994
Mr. David G. Liu
Senior Engineer
City of Diamond -Bar
21660 E. Copley Drive
Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Subject: Engineering Services for Two Intersections -
Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive and
Grand Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard
Dear David:
�WI. HTS }}
���.. REN I•H�:
lASSOCIATES
Profeseiooa[ Civil EneerinE
Based on our telephone conversation on Monday, March 28, 1994, Dwight French &
Associates, Inc. (DFA) is pleased to present this proposal for engineering services at the
two subject intersections.
Our understanding of the work necessary is represented by the following tasks.
11 TASK 1
TASK 2
11 TASK 3
CONCEPTUAL STRIPING PLAN
DFA will develop conceptual striping
review and comment.
plan for both intersections for City to
DEVELOP PRELIMINARY STRIPING PLAN
DFA will develop preliminary. striping plan base on City's review comments
and submit to the City: We understand the City will forward this information
the traffic signal design person.
DEVELOP INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Based on the results generated from Task 1 and 2, we will develop the
intersection improvement plan.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Councilwoman Eileen Ansari
RE Council Sub -Committee For Library Services
DATE: April 19,1994
ISSUE -
Shall the City Council establish a sub -committee of the
Council for library services liaison and related matters?
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Mayor appoint a Library Services
sub -committee of the City Council, comprised of two members
of the Council.
DISCUSSION•
The community of Diamond Bar is provided library services
through the County of Los Angeles Library District. The
District has suffered significant reductions in revenue, as
a consequence of State of California legislation which has
shifted property taxes, from County revenues, thereby
s.
adversely affecting the full funding of library e
The City recently provided short-term (March through June
funding support to the Library District to add two days of
library services, to the three days of County funded
services. There continues to be a need to communicate with
the County, the Library District, library user and support
groups, other cities and the State legislature regarding the
future provision of library services. A Council Library
sub -committee is an effective mechanism to accomplish such
objectives.
TO: Diamond Har City Council
n
FROM: Ratan & Tucker Z- -�
S
DATE: March 1, 1994
RE: Public Records Issue
G7 G? C
I , INTbtODUC'TIaN •
Z-5
This office was requested by the Interim City Attorney to
follow up on our previous opinion regarding the public record
status of Councilmember Gary Miller's personal financial documents
which were used in the formation of a "no conflict' opinion by the
former City Attorney. There appears to be two major issues
involved. The first issue in whether such records are "public* for
the purpose of dissemination to the general populace. The second
issue is whether such records would be available for review by the
other members of the City Council. These issues are discussed
separately below.
r previous opinion that a city attorney's
1. We reiterate ou
review of personal financial doeuMAts of a councilmember for the
purpose of rendering a conflict of interest opinion does not
necessarily serve to transform these documents into "public
records" under the public Records Act. As p
reviously noted, the
Act provides a "catch-all" exception to public disclosure
requirements if there is no applicable statutory exception. This
exception states that a document is not subject to public
disclosure if "on the tacts of the particular case the public
interest served by not making the record public clearly outweighs
PS112W114U;-M1U060M- OSM194
obtains personal financial documents from the subject individual.
The FppC does not consider such documents aa automatically becoming
Public merely because they Were used in forming the opinion. pppC
file documents are segregated into "disclosure" and "nondisclosur •
categories for the e
purpose of public Records Ace. re
Turvtll stated that financial requests. MIS. records which are already public,
such as the Statement o! Economic Interests filed by all
Officers, are disclosed b .Public
Y the FppC. However, personal financial
documents which are not normally subject to public disclosure, such
as personal checker, personal transaction records, or tax returns,
are most often not considered subject to disclosure under the
Public Records Act and are placed in the 'nondisclosure" portion of
the file. Therefore, even if this matter had been subject to a
full investigation and opinion by the FPPC, it is likely that the
documents at issue would not be subject to public dissemination.
In the present situation
the question of whether the
documents reviewed by the former City Attorney are public is now
moot because the City does not even have possesseioa of any of those
documents and has no way of responding to a Public Records Act
.request. If the documents are subsequently revealed to the present
City Attorney, we believe that they would still not be subject to
disclosure to the public at large under the public Records Act for
the reasons previously stated.
a• The second issue is whether information revealed to a
city attorney by one councilmember must be revealed to the other
members of the council. There are differing views on this issue,
and there does not appear to be any case law directly on point.
FMUW1S41;9-MVZWA% (80,u -3-
LAW OFFICES
MICHAEL B. MONTGOMERY
A LAW CORPORATION
The City Council, at its meeting of February 15, 1994,
decided to take you up on your generous offer to, "discuss
this matter further if the Council so desires
As I discussed with Leonard on the phone, there is no
dispute with your opinion, so far as it goes. Certainly
the mere fact that a writing is in the possession of the
public, does not make it a public record, nor does the
mere fact that the City Attorney happens to review it.
One point is significant, and that is that the question
may well be moot. Mr. Arczynski's letter of February 1,
1994, states, " . . . if I had the documents, I would not
divulge the same; however, since I do not, the point is
somewhat academic, is it not?" My inquiry was not
concerned with the subject matter of the documents, but
simply whether or not the documents were public records.
Along that line, at least two unanswered questions remain:
1. If the City Attorney happens to review the
documents in his official position as City Attorney, by a
Councilmember who intends to, and then does, rely and act
on the City Attorney's opinion re conflict of interest,
and at public meetings, then is the populace at large
entitled to review the documents upon which the City
Attorney, based his opinion of "no conflict"? You may
wish to add to the quotient the fact that the votes in
this case could affect the permanent nature and character
of the community in that the issues involved general plan
adoption and major discretionary land use permits for
major developments; and
Memorandum\Hemphill\owan
Page 1
OF COUNSEL
13200 CROSSROADS PARKWAY NORTH
MATTHEW C. BISHOP
SUITE 350
ALAN R. BURNS
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91740
JOHN ROBERT HARPER'
TELEPHONE (310) 90&1650
FACSIMILE (310) 906-1854
NAPA COUNTY OFFICE
1475 FOURTH STREET
NAPA, CALIFORNW 94659
ALSO ADMITTED TO FLORIDA
(707) 2568000
AND HAWAII STATE BARS
MEMORANDUM
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
453 S. GLASSELL STREET
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
TO: Leonard Hemphill
92EA8
(714) 771.7726
Robert Owen
'NKFESSONAL COF om„om
FROM: Interim City Attorney
WENDY D. DAWER
DATE: February 18, 1994
RE: Your Public Records Opinion of
February 15, 1994.
The City Council, at its meeting of February 15, 1994,
decided to take you up on your generous offer to, "discuss
this matter further if the Council so desires
As I discussed with Leonard on the phone, there is no
dispute with your opinion, so far as it goes. Certainly
the mere fact that a writing is in the possession of the
public, does not make it a public record, nor does the
mere fact that the City Attorney happens to review it.
One point is significant, and that is that the question
may well be moot. Mr. Arczynski's letter of February 1,
1994, states, " . . . if I had the documents, I would not
divulge the same; however, since I do not, the point is
somewhat academic, is it not?" My inquiry was not
concerned with the subject matter of the documents, but
simply whether or not the documents were public records.
Along that line, at least two unanswered questions remain:
1. If the City Attorney happens to review the
documents in his official position as City Attorney, by a
Councilmember who intends to, and then does, rely and act
on the City Attorney's opinion re conflict of interest,
and at public meetings, then is the populace at large
entitled to review the documents upon which the City
Attorney, based his opinion of "no conflict"? You may
wish to add to the quotient the fact that the votes in
this case could affect the permanent nature and character
of the community in that the issues involved general plan
adoption and major discretionary land use permits for
major developments; and
Memorandum\Hemphill\owan
Page 1
_GW
MICHAEL B. MONTGOMERY
2. If the City Attorney represents the Council, as a
body, who holds the privilege of confidentiality?
My initial opinion of January 6, 1994, was very brief,_ as
I did not expect the issue to be elevated to the level of
its present concern. I based that opinion on an extension
of Ward, which I believe is the current trend. Let me
recite some of the passages from papers presented at the
City Attorney's division at the last League meeting in
October 1993:
1. . the city attorney's communications with
staff members cannot be kept secret from supervisors and
that communications with individual members of the city
council cannot be kept confidential from the full city
council. It is important that each city official fully
understand this principal in order to avoid misunder-
standings."
2. "City officials must understand that their
communications with the city attorney are not protected
from disclosure to supervisors within the organization.
Even though this knowledge may in some situations preclude
frank conversations with the city attorney, it is import-
ant that this fact be communicated to staff members or
members of the city council before a staff member or
members of the city council have a communication with the
city attorney that the person incorrectly believes will be
kept confidential."
3. "The practice of some city attorneys to advise
their councils that they will not disclose to the council
itself any conflict of interest advice which has been
given to an individual council member thus appears to be
in direct violation of this Rule [3-600].",
For the foregoing reasons, I declined the offer of Coun-
cilman Miller to review his copies of the documents,
because I felt I would not be able to maintain his condi-
tion of confidentiality.
Councilman Harmony has requested that if your ultimate
opinion differs from mine, that statutory or decisional
authority be provided for reference.
cc: City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
M am o f a n d u m\ H w m p►i i L 1\C -JW",
Pages 2
_ ��;C!/Cn///uc�7, �I ���4. �72.f1r12� C� •J/!��
Michael Montgomery
13200 Crossroads Parkway
Suite 350
Industry, California 91786
NUMBER CNE C,V'C CEN'ER
P O BOA 059
BREA.CALiFORNIA 92622- J59
r,7I41 990-09C
TELEPHONE �1 j101 6 38'
n
9113 FOOTHILL W&LEVA p
SUITE 200 _<
RANCHO CUCAMOHGA. � ft IFORiM�%7
TELEPHONE
ti9op�3BI-oils' •C
- r
IN R[PLT PLEAS'tRCFEvPr3 C
77
Brea..
c1t n
M
Re: Your correspondence of January 6, 1994
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
It is the purpose of this correspondence to respond
to yours of January 6, 1994, which appears to "relay" some sort
of public record request from one Terri Birrell pertaining to
documents and records with regard to the non -issue of Diamond
Bar Councilmember Gary Miller's involvement in the somewhat
euphemistically titled "South Pointe Master Plan." As you are
undoubtedly well aware, Mr. Miller, at one time, had an
interest in a portion of the real property within the South
Pointe Area. Having divested himself of any interest in the
subject property well over one (1) year prior to the project
application being filed, I provided the quite unremarkable
opinion that, pursuant to the requirements and strictures of
the Political Reform Act of 1974 (California Government Code §4
87000, st seq.), the provisions of which I understand you are
passing familiar, Mr Miller had no conflict under the law.
As a result of that divestiture, and the time frame
involved, it was abundantly clear to all that Mr. Miller had no
conflict of interest. Yet, in an attempt on his part to ensure
that "politics" did not enter the fray, Mr. Miller clearly and
unequivocally announced to all and sundry that he simply would
not participate in the deliberations on the project. In fact,
as your self-styled "citizens group" client must recall, Mr.
Miller even went so far as to totally absent himself from
meetings at which it was discussed (and, while Mayor, handing
over the gavel to the Mayor Pro Tempore). Those actions on the
part of Mr. Miller were not only unavailing, they were
virtually counterproductive. In hindsight, if Mr. Miller was
to be subject to the personal abuse, venomous attacks and
JAMES :. MARKMAN
AN OREW V. ARCZYNSKI
RALPH O. HANSOM
JEFFREY KING
O. CRAIG SCA
WILLIAM P CURLEY M
MARSHA G. SLOUG'
JULIA A, KEMP
PAMELA P. KING
HERIBERTO F. OIAZ
.February 1, 1994
BONNIE BA14EY-JONES
Michael Montgomery
13200 Crossroads Parkway
Suite 350
Industry, California 91786
NUMBER CNE C,V'C CEN'ER
P O BOA 059
BREA.CALiFORNIA 92622- J59
r,7I41 990-09C
TELEPHONE �1 j101 6 38'
n
9113 FOOTHILL W&LEVA p
SUITE 200 _<
RANCHO CUCAMOHGA. � ft IFORiM�%7
TELEPHONE
ti9op�3BI-oils' •C
- r
IN R[PLT PLEAS'tRCFEvPr3 C
77
Brea..
c1t n
M
Re: Your correspondence of January 6, 1994
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
It is the purpose of this correspondence to respond
to yours of January 6, 1994, which appears to "relay" some sort
of public record request from one Terri Birrell pertaining to
documents and records with regard to the non -issue of Diamond
Bar Councilmember Gary Miller's involvement in the somewhat
euphemistically titled "South Pointe Master Plan." As you are
undoubtedly well aware, Mr. Miller, at one time, had an
interest in a portion of the real property within the South
Pointe Area. Having divested himself of any interest in the
subject property well over one (1) year prior to the project
application being filed, I provided the quite unremarkable
opinion that, pursuant to the requirements and strictures of
the Political Reform Act of 1974 (California Government Code §4
87000, st seq.), the provisions of which I understand you are
passing familiar, Mr Miller had no conflict under the law.
As a result of that divestiture, and the time frame
involved, it was abundantly clear to all that Mr. Miller had no
conflict of interest. Yet, in an attempt on his part to ensure
that "politics" did not enter the fray, Mr. Miller clearly and
unequivocally announced to all and sundry that he simply would
not participate in the deliberations on the project. In fact,
as your self-styled "citizens group" client must recall, Mr.
Miller even went so far as to totally absent himself from
meetings at which it was discussed (and, while Mayor, handing
over the gavel to the Mayor Pro Tempore). Those actions on the
part of Mr. Miller were not only unavailing, they were
virtually counterproductive. In hindsight, if Mr. Miller was
to be subject to the personal abuse, venomous attacks and
Michael Montgomery
February 1, 1994
Page Two
vituPArative slurs of members of the
probably should have participated. public in an
y event, he
Your desire to serve as a conduit to the
a Purported Public Records public under
6250, et seq.J requestAct (California Government Code §§
representing cities Californialexes mwho considers no attorney
files to be available to the or
Records Act. public under the California public
thereunder strkeSrmeuas that such files are available Public
ht
nothing else, eviscerate the salute of follY and would, if
attorney-client privilege, Moreover, Purposes of the
who have some chimerical need to to simply share, with all
public official, the most rummage in the affairs of a
returns and the like Personal of documents
safeguarding is the antithesis of the documents, tax
attempt g of a client's matters required of those of
p to honorably engage in the profession of law. us who
As I have stated, with some frequency
Councilmembers (including
Messers. Harmony and Werner)
erstwhile cliets Mz.
auricular matters with I will not Ahaari and
the morel inquisitive do not, share such
espouse a "need to " Y who'
ability to know • To do so would set at naught the
provide thoughtful counsel to those ro
same. We take on faith that
clients to forthright You would not remonstraateiyou=he
documents necessa g Y and candidly Share all of tho facts and
lot, all .the while to a thoroughgoing analysis of the clients
aggregate thereof to anln hothat you will simply divulge the
doubtless, produce a client unwiilling to impart, true state of approach would,
in the the !acts since, perforce, all will benkly, the
be reducedtobsurdityin a the Postulate for candid analysis
that what isated otherwise,
is lee's client cannot feel secure
seems little, if an lawyer goes no further,
simply pride a factual nt� ere
to the exercise. Thnthwill
the best light or, worse, pwillnenshroudtation hat Puts him or her in
with the deleterious effects as have been visited upon others
unable or unwilling �® pertinent data all
truth.. The w g to confide in their Counsel theunvarnishedprovision of an ndlesslstream,ofhhomiliesec=cod to the
dollop of twaddle thrown t for truisms, with a
good measure.
Michael Montgomery
February 1, 1994
Page Three
Leaving all of that aside, as manifestly statedto
your client, Max Maxwell,.in September of the year last pa
all of the dndunottretainedebybthris.officeMiller
forwere
reasonsreturned
which
Mr. Miller an
should be abundantly clear, even to those who seek the
documents. To assert that this office "lost" the same is
laughable and requires no further response..
In summary then, if I had the documents, I would not
divulge the same; however, since I do not, the point is
somewhat academic, is it not?
Very ly yours,,
Andrew V. Arczynski
AVA:clf
C\1011\LMONTG
cc: Councilmember Gary Miller
bcc: Terrance Belanger, City Manager
u►w Ory crs
MICHAEL B. MONTGOMERY
A LAW COWRATON
lY Cf0006A0AOS PAWWAY NORTH
sm !!0
MY OF MOLS N. C&FORNM 01744
TELEPNW We WiNo
FACOME x+ IM 1001
MLORANDUM
ALSO AW"M TO Ft 0100A
AND HAWU STATE OARS
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Diamond Aar
THROUGH: City Manager
FROM: Intorlm City Attorn
/r
DATY: January 8, 1994
SUBJECT: Separate Legal Opinions
Of COUNSEL
MATTMEW C. OISMOP
ALAN R. 6URN8'
JOHN R46ERT WPER'
NAPA WUNTY OFFICE
1176 FOWTH OTREEI
NAPA. CALIF000 04M
M 2ft4W
2ff1�f QE COUNTY OFFICE
ASS S. GLA86Eu STREET
CWVA E. CAUFORNu
686M
(710) 77 x •7720
WOLA "K eoMmand
WENOY 0. OAWER
I havo received the enclosed request for an opinion from
Couneilmember Papen. I am responding to the Council as a whole,
because I am unclear of the Council's policy re individual opinion
requests.
First, responding tq Yrs. Pepen's question, the appellate decision in
Ward v. Su erior Cont, 1977, 70 Cal. App.3d 239 138 Cal. Rptr.
532, provides t t�t :erg can be no separate attorney-client
relationship between the public agency attorney and each separate
officer. As stated at pap 330 "He in no wise represents the officers
personally." Therefore, there is no attorney-olient relationship
botween the attorney and the individual members ot the council. No
such relationship existing, any records given to me in my capacity as
City Attorney, would of necessity have to be turned over to the City
Clark.
As to the nomad part of the request, persomwi and disciplinary
matters are "cwt from disciosura, where the release "would
coaxtitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." GovOMORt
Code IM.
I ash the council to clarify whether or not the City Attorney is
expeated to respond to individual opinion requests.
n=D THIS DATE
TO: Michael xontgomery, Interim Cit ttorney
MCNI Phyllis Papen, Councilmmbe y�
DATE: January 5, 1991
SUBJECT: Attorney -Client Privilege of Councilaambers
CC: Terry Belanger, City Manager
At the coaolusion Of last ni ht's council meetin or rather early
this morning (approx. 3:OSamf, Xr. 8asmony raised an issue
regarding attorney client privilege for councilaspbers.
Please providd the council with the bec kground intossation, a
discussion of the issue, your opinion_ and code section, etc. that
would support your opinion.
If I understand your statement, Councilmesibers proprietary
Personal,. business or financial informsation is not confidential.
Does this also apply to personnel files? Disciplinary actions?
JAM(: L. MAR 0MAN
ANOR(W V. ARCZYNSx1
RALPH O. MANSON
J(rrR(Y KING
0. CRAIG rOx
WILLIAM P. CURLCY
MARSHA G.SL000M
JULIA A. REM•
PAMELA P RING
"CRISCRTO r OIAZ September 24, 1993
SONNIC BAILCY•JONCS
Max Maxwell
3211 Bent Twig Lane
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Re: Yours of August 10, 1993
Dear Mr. Maxwell:
"""M OMC CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE
P.O. six 1069
•RCA. CALIFOR(((NIA 92622.1069
TCLCPHON( 117111 990.0901
117101 6 9 1.361,
9117 rOOTMILL 90ULEVARO
SUIrC 200
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CALIrORNIA 9 730
T[LEPMON[ 190!1 ISO -2742
X19091 761-0216
IN RCPLY PLEAS( R(rCR T0;
Brea
This correspondence in response to
10, 1993 with regard to a requestYours 'o! August
Mayor Millers alleged conflt!linterestmconceringath�ng to
South Pointe project.
withwith Mr. eliinarily, let me point out that I have spoken
Montgomerywith regard to corresponding with you,
that heyhas nnoMconcerns with On September 22, 1993, indicated
Additionally, it must be note dythateyo� oorriapc denCeiwasyou.
directed to me at the City Hall. p�
maintain an office presence at you may know, I do not
daily basis and, accordingly, the ,Diamond Bar City Hall on a
location is collected b g y' mail directed to me at that
to me. Unfortunately, y the City Clerk's office and forwarded
received by the undersignedletter
until shortlyu Augusttember 9, was not
1993.
with
advised that havelrevieWedrtherfilesto y pertaining
Millers interests, or more a query, please be
P icing to Mr.
vis-a-vis the South Pointe ariaroPriately, lack thereof,
is consiMred by this office to baAattornou may know' the matter
as to a= information presented to me b r.client privileged
additio�Xly, any information Y Mr. Miller and,
Miller with regard to the to.lcr°aided by this Office to Mr.
However, Mr. Miller has specificallyuirstructedestion or rmeatod topics.
correspond with you on the topic and to provide whatever
max
3.111 Bentejl
Diamond Bar, Ln.
714 861-4121 CA 91765
Andrew ArCzynski, City Attorney
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Dr., Ste. 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
August 10, 1993
Dear Andrew Arczynski;
I am requesting
to g copies of the information
havinga Your Office that clearly Mayor Gary Miller
conflict of interest in states his position on not
the R -N -P Development Inc. the South Pointe Master Plan, or
properties.
Gary Miller stated publicly that this information is ave'
Your office many months
information, however all ago.
I have already ilable from
5� 1993 addressed to Co the Cit Y asked for this
Y Jahn me is a letter dated January
stated his position as: ��iman John Forbinq, where Ga
my city Council colleaguesPurpose of this letter is to Miller
inform
involved in either that I have made a decision to not be
one of the maps has • Processing of nor the decisions relating to
a part of thSouth Points Maen sthriPled (Map No. VTM 51407
that is
The above statement
is Potential conflict o! interest a clarification of
Of supplying to the , nor does it meet Gary Miller's
public enough material to clarify requirements
iss e.
J a Y the issue.
Please forward the material that Ga
the above letter is all that exists, rY Miller has submitted. If
clarify the matter. , Please respond in writing to
Thank you,
c�
Max Maxwell
lAT-P4W"CY W.63
Max Maxwell
September 24, 1993
Page Two
information I may have in my possession which he has
to me. Accordingly, Mr. Miller has instructed me, PrO"ided
withlyoutregaranding dingthe
the tmatterclient privilege, to correspond
My review Of our files reveals that the information
Provided to me by Mr. Miller was returned to
destroyed by this office Mr. Miller or
after review b
Stated otherwise, it is not m y the undersigned.
personal, confidential not
eitheofpr
to
osmaintain
individual nature with regard to cr r
interest matters. I typically retlients on conflictof
request of the urn such documents or, at the
client, destroy the same in order to
any inadvertent release of personal, Preclude
information. Accordingly,P private and privileged
request, this office denotemaintainytha matWith erial to
hur
supplied to us. was
Very truly yours,
rew V. Aresynski
City Attorney
AVA/nlc City of Diamond Bar
N\1011\LMAXWELL\DB 28.1
cc: Mayor Gary Miller (transmitted'by fax)
MEMORANDUM
TO: DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SISTER CITY SUB -COMMITTEE
(MAYOR WERNER & COUNCIL MEMBER ANSARI)
PREPARED
BY: MAYOR WERNER
SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF SISTER CITIES
DATE: APRIL 29, 1994
On April 22, 1994, Council Member Ansari and I met at a duly noticed meeting of the Sister City
sub -committee. At this meeting the Sub -Committee considered:
Program objectives in establishing a sister city;
Review and consideration of the establishment of Sister City status with Bucharest, Romania
Presentation by Mr. Michael Li, of Congressman Jay Kim's office, recommending the
establishment of a Sister City with the City of Haicheng, China.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. No cost to the City of Diamond Bar - It is the Committee's recommendation that local
not-for-profit groups be established from interested residents, business owners or community
associations who would participate in the cultural exchange associated with the Program. Such
group(s), each of which might be comprised of members sharing the same cultural background or
country of origin, would be responsible to provide the funding as may be necessary to participate
in the program. The objective is to avoid the use of City revenues for participation in the
program. There may be more than one Sister City and therefore more than one support group
established.
2. Adopt the City of Bucharest, Romania as a Sister City - Attached are materials that have
been presented by Ms. Angie Thomson and Pastor Bob Clayton. Pastor Clayton has established a
local support group for an international relief effort that has been spearheaded by Ms. Angie
Thomson in cooperation with the Bucharest City Council. The project is a humanitarian effort
directed to the multitude of "street children" in Bucharest who are living in severely desperate and
unhealthy conditions. The City of Diamond Bar would serve as a point of central collections and
support to Ms. Thomson's efforts abroad. A video presentation has been prepared and includes
footage from Ms. Thomson's recent visit to Bucharest in April, 1994.
The Sister City sub -committee recommends the City of Diamond Bar adopt the City of
Bucharest, Romania in support of this relief effort and future cultural exchanges and potential
economic opportunities.
3. Adopt the City of Haicheng, China - Attached are materials presented by Mr. Michael Li
recommending the adoption of the City of Haicheng, China, as a Sister City. The adoption of
Haicheng as a Sister City does not foreclose the opportunity to establish similar relationships with
other cities from China or other Asian countries. The establishment of Haicheng as a Sister City
is seen by the sub -committee as having potential for immediate cultural and economic
development opportunities between our two communities.
The sub -committee is continuing in our efforts in following through with the recommendations
suggested by the previous Sister City Sub -Committee. This includes:
A. Citywide Survey - The Sub -Committee recommends that in the next available quarterly
City Newsletter, the Sub -Committee would present a series of questions to the community
requesting input on: (a) community interest in participation in the Sister Cities program; (b)
Interest in the establishment of not-for-profit Sister City groups to absorb the cost of the City's
participation in the program; (c) and other related concerns.
B. Committee Continuation - The work of the Council's sub -committee should be continued
in the spirit of community participation and interactive relationships. It is suggested that, if the
above recommendations are followed, the next steps in the establishment of a Sister City Program
would require the Sub -Committee's outreach to community organizations, businesses, and
residents to identify support for the above recommended and other Sister City candidates,
methods of funding, and other particular details.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.1.1
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994 REPORT DATE: April 28, 1994
FROM: Frank M. Usher, Assistant City Manager
David G. Liu, Senior Engineer
TITLE: Engineering Services Contract For the Development and Implementation of a Pavement
Management System
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of Proposition 111 for State Gas Tax Fund and the criteria
stipulated by the Proposition C Local Return Guidelines, local jurisdiction must certify that it has in place a
pavement management system (PMS). This is to foster the cost-effective use of public funds prior to expending
Proposition C funds. The system needs to provide an overview of the condition of the total street system, a
means of documenting street maintenance/rehabilitation needs, and a means of rationally prioritizing the street
improvement projects in terms of needs and cost-effectiveness. To accomplish this work, it is necessary to
retain the services of a qualified engineering firm. In response to the City's Request for Proposal, the Selection
Committee received and evaluated four (4) proposals for said services.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award a professional engineering services
contract to Dwight French and Associates in an amount not -to -exceed $37,020.00, plus a contingency amount
of $3,000.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
_ Resolution(s) Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's office)
Ordinances(s) X Other: (ATTACHMENTS 1-2)
X Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
_Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
X Yes _ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Ve-rr'ence L. Aelanger Frank M. Usher
"David G: Liu
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Senior Engineer
C:\WP60\LINDAKAY\AGENDA-9\PMS.503
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: May 3, 1994
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager
SUBJECT: Engineering Services Contract For the Development and Implementation of a Pavement
Management System
ISSUE STATEMENT:
The City desires to development and implement a pavement management system. To accomplish this work,
it is necessary to retain the services of a qualified engineering firm.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award a professional engineering services contract to Dwight French
and Associates in an amount not -to -exceed $37,020.00, plus a contingency amount of $3,000.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
For FY 1993-94, $55,000 Proposition C Fund has been budgeted for the development and implementation of
a pavement management system.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
In conformance with the requirements of Proposition 111 for State Gas Tax Fund and the criteria stipulated
by the Proposition C Local Return Guidelines, local jurisdiction must certify that it has in place a Pavement
Management System (PMS). This is to foster the cost-effective use of public funds prior to expending
Proposition C funds for street repair and maintenance on streets heavily used by public transit or on bikeways.
This requirement for a PMS is consistent with the PMS required by Proposition 111 (Streets & Highways Code
Section 2108.1) and must meet the following criteria:
1. Inventory of existing pavements including, as a minimum, arterial and collector routes, reviewed and
updated biennially.
2. Inventory of existing class I bikeways (Bike Path), reviewed and updated biennially.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE 2
3. Assessment/Evaluation of pavement conditions including, as a minimum, arterial and collector routes,
reviewed and updated biennially.
4. Identification of all sections of pavement needing rehabilitation or replacement.
5. Determination of budget needs for rehabilitation or replacement of deficient sections of pavement for
current and following biennial period(s).
As can be expected, a computer-based pavement management system will provide the following:
• A means of documenting street maintenance/rehabilitation needs and a basis for organizing and planning
the City's street maintenance/rehabilitation program.
• An overview of the condition of the total street system.
• A means of rationally prioritizing the street improvement projects in terms of needs and cost-
effectiveness.
In Attachment 1, staff has identified the goals and objectives of implementing a pavement management system
for the City.
On February 2, 1994, staff initiated a request for proposal (RFP) to retain an engineering firm to develop and
implement a pavement management system. In response to the RFP, a total of four (4) proposals were received
and evaluated by the Selection Committee.
The Selection Committee consisted of two (2) staff members, Frank Usher and David Liu, and Commissioner
of the Traffic and Transportation Commission, Todd Chavers. Based on the proposals, the Committee invited
all four (4) firms for interview/presentation and further consideration on April 3, 1994 and April 11, 1994.
These firms are as follows:
• BSI Consultants
• Dwight French and Associates
• Pavement Management Systems, Inc.
• UMA Engineering, Inc.
With the goals and objectives established by the City, the Selection Committee needed to identify a system
which best fits our needs. Based on the current staffing size, we do not have the ability for a complex system
that requires constant attention, a long learning curve or for complex data requirements. Consequently, we
need a system that is a proven system, is simple to use, and is easy to access, edit and operate.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING SERVICES
PAGE 3
Upon evaluation of all four firms, an objective satisfaction matrix (Attachment 2) was prepared. This reflects
the Committee's objective and qualitative criteria.
The Selection Committee unanimously believes that .the system by Dwight French and Associates (DFA),
represents the best choice for the City. DFA's system provides the methodology, software, and procedure
to meet the goals and objectives established by the City. It should be noted that the system operates entirely
within a microcomputer -based system running dBase IV and that the graphics package operates with AutoCAD.
The City currently has both of these software programs.
Some of the cities that have implemented DFA's pavement management system are Duarte, Laguna Niguel,
Temecula, etc. The proposed fee from Dwight French and Associates is $37,020. Development and
implementation of this proposed system is scheduled to be completed within seven (7) months from the date
of Notice to Proceed.
Prepared By:
Frank M. Usher
David G. Liu
C.:\WP60\LINDAKAY\CCR-94\PMS.503
ATTACHMENT #1
GOALS & OBJECTIVES OF IMPLEMENTING A
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
GOALS:
• Quantify pavement conditions of all streets.
• Determine the impact of budget levels on pavement condition.
• Develop a program for annual and 5 -year plans of maintenance and
rehabilitation projects.
• Establish a system which is compatible with the City's GIS/Mapping
System.
OBJECTIVES:
• Inventory of existing pavements.
• Assessment of present conditions of overall street network as well as
individual sections.
• Projected conditions of overall street network and individual sections.
• Identification of individual sections requiring maintenance and
rehabilitation in current and future years.
• Determination of budget needs to provide an acceptable level of
service.
• Impact of various budget levels and maintenance options on projected
condition of the network.
• Preparation of the budget based on the PMS and submission of it to
the City Manager/City Council.
0 Provisions for future modifications and improvements to the system.
T
O
n
D
m
3
m
z
D
r
c
O
z
z
O
O
x
z
m
N
z
mm
A
c
D
r
D
m
m
m
N
c
M
D
m
to
U5I
C
CAI
DI
D
m
�
n
O
I
z
O
D
z�
l
O
D
I
OCr
O
O
O
O
N
O
C)
N
y
T
e
A
W
Cil
oe
Ul
GS F
FSI
o
0
O
0
O
OD
O
00
O
r`�-yJy
L
A
A
A
Cil
N
00
N
N
00
O
M!
O
O
O
f
�
a
w
m;aC) m
DC7
1 D C) M
X 0
r
r
r
(0
O
N
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 1994, between the City of Diamond Bar, a
Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and
Dwight French and Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
"CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional engineering services
with respect to the Development and Implementation of a Pavement
Management System ("Project" hereafter).
(ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services, a full, true and correct of copy of
which proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this
reference made a part hereof.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform
professional engineering services necessary to render advice and
assistance to CITY, CITY's City Council and staff in the
preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to
perform such services and is willing to perform such professional
engineering services as hereinafter defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and
CONSULTANT as follows:
1
B. Agreement.
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply
to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement
otherwise requires:
(a) Project: The preparation of maps, surveys,
reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing,
of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as
required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public
hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the
project.
(b) Services: Such professional engineering
services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to
complete the Project.
(c) Completion of Proiect: The date of completion
of all phases of the Project, including any and all procedures,
development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical
reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT
at public hearings will be determined by the CITY.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and
complete the project in accordance with Exhibits "A" hereto and all
in accordance with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations,
ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of
CITY and in accordance to the standard of care normally provided by
practitioners of the engineering profession.
2
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps,
surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical
documents, as described in Exhibits "A" to CITY within the time
specified by the CITY. Copies of the documents shall be in such
numbers as ate required by Exhibit "A". CITY may thereafter review
and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and
CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents
as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in
such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The
time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be
extended upon written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion
of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this
Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by
CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be
fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT
further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by
CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $37,020 for
the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall
cover.the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect
costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and
subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY,
3
shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly
basis, and such invoices shall be paid within thirty (30) days of
receipt of CONSULTANT invoices. The CONSULTANT shall detail the
charges by project task number, hours worked, and employee
classifications, total not to exceed amount for the project if it
is a time -and -material basis project, and percent completed if it
is a lump sum basis project. All charges shall be in accordance
with CONSULTANT's proposal either with respect to hourly rates or
lump sum amounts for individual tasks.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY
be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of g0$ of the
maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final
documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as
described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final
payment shall be made not later than sixty (60) days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional
services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in
CONSULTANT's proposal as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be
paid on a reimbursement basis. Charges for additional services
shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY
within thirty (30) days after said invoices are received by CITY.
4
shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly
basis, and such invoices shall be paid within thirty (30) days of
receipt of CONSULTANT invoices. The CONSULTANT shall detail the
charges by project task number, hours worked, and employee
classifications, total not to exceed amount for the project if it
is a time -and -material basis project, and percent completed if it
is a lump sum basis project. All charges shall be in accordance
with CONSULTANT's proposal either with respect to hourly rates or
lump sum amounts for individual tasks.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY
be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 90% of the
maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final
documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as
described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final
payment shall be made not later than sixty (60) days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional
services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in
CONSULTANT's proposal as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be
paid on a reimbursement basis. Charges for additional services
shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY
within thirty (30) days after said invoices are received by CITY.
4
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in
Exhibit "A" hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps
and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers
necessary in order to complete the Project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from
CITY files applicable to the Project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining
information from other governmental agencies and/or private
parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make
all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such
information.
5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports
prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be
considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services
performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified
materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT
may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire. CONSULTANT shall not be held
liable for use of such documents by CITY for purposes other than
intended by the Agreement.
6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by
CITY upon -the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to
CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of
k,
termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement
is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's
applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "A", on a pro -rata
basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of
the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT
receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above.
CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports,
whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the
date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement
except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the
parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7.
The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons
primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this
Agreement:
CITY: David G. Liu
Department of Public Works
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
CONSULTANT: John C Whitman
Dwight French & Associates, Inc.
1470 S. Valley Vista Drive, Ste. 140
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by
mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee
forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States
2-1
mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work
under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required
hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall
CONSULTANT allow any subconsultant to commence work on a
subcontract until all insurance required of the subconsultant has
been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all time
during the term of this Agreement the following policies of
insurance:
(a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before
beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of
insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation
insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through
subconsultants in carrying out the work specified herein, in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of
compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing
work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of
Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against
liability for workers, compensation or to undertake self insurance
in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply
with such.provisions before commencing the performance of the work
of this Agreement."
7
(b) Public Liability and Prov ama e: Throughout
the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense,
CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and
effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT,
comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile
insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury,
death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000.000.00) for property damage, bodily injury or death to any
one person or for any one accident or occurrence and One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00) aggregate.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and
maintain at all times during
the life of this Agreement, a policy
or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions
("malpractice") providing protection of at least One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per claim and in the aggregate for errors
and omissions („malpractice") with respect to loss arising from
actions of CONSULTANT performing the Project hereunder on behalf of
CITY.
remen
(d) Genera Insurance Rea ui - —ts: All insurance
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried
only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in
the State of California and policies required under. paragraphs
8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insured CITY, its elected
officials, officers, employees, agents and representatives. All
8
policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable that:
(1) the insurer, except the errors and omissions insurer, waives
the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials,
officers, employees, agents and representatives; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be
carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be canceled or materially
changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to
CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies
of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate
evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own
account insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify
and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials,
officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss,
damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by
CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any
manner arising out of the negligent, intentional and/or willful
acts and/or omissions of CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement,
including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of
any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made,
either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written
consent of CITY.
11. Damaaes: In the,event that CONSULTANT fails to
submit to CITY the completed project, together with all documents
2
and supplemental material required hereunder, in public hearing
form to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY, within the time set
forth herein, or as may be extended by written consent of the
parties hereto, CONSULTANT shall pay to CITY, as liquidated damages
and not as a penalty, the sum of Two Hundred dollars ($200.00) per
day for each day CONSULTANT is in default, which sum represents a
reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto to estimate a fair
compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result from such
a default in performance by CONSULTANT, and due to the difficulty
which would otherwise occur in establishing actual damages
resulting from such default, unless said default is caused by CITY
or by acts of God, acts of the public enemy, fire, floods,
epidemics, or quarantine restrictions.
12. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree
that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are
independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be
construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY.
13. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.
14. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding
is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement,
the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to
recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an
amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
10
15. Mediation: Any dispute or controversy arising under
this Agreement, or in connection with any of the terms and
conditions hereof, shall be referred by the parties hereto for
mediation. A third party, neutral mediation service shall be
selected, as agreed upon by the parties and the costs and expenses
thereof shall be borne equally by the parties hereto. In the event
the parties are unable to mutually agree upon the mediator to be
selected hereunder, the City Council shall select such a neutral,
third party mediation service and the City Council's decision shall
be final. The parties agree to utilize their good faith efforts to
resolve any such dispute or controversy so submitted to mediation.
It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties hereto that
referral of any such dispute or controversy, and mutual good faith
efforts to resolve the same thereby, shall be conditions precedent
to the institution of any action or proceeding, whether at law or
in equity with respect to any such dispute or controversy.
16. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and
all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the
parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to
this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party
which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or
promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding.
Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is
in writing signed by all parties.
11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CONSULTANT:
Dwight French and Associates, Inc.
Name and Title
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
12
Mayor
(j v
21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE - SUrM 100
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177
0AQ_5trn-?A89 . FAX 909-861-3117
DATE: May 3, 1994
FROM: City of Diamond Bar, Department of Community
Development
TO: Property Owners Within 500 Foot Radius and Other
Interested Parties
SUBJECT: South Pointe Master Plan
Referral
s f Project
Alternatives to the Planning
In May of 1993 the Planning Commission concluded its review 1 f
the South Pointe Master Plan (SPMP) by recommending app
of
all its components to the City Council. The City Council has
referred the project, pursuant to GovernmentSection 65857,
Code
to Planning Commission for a report and recommendation on two
recently proposed project alternatives.
The Planning Commission will consider the matter on Monday, May
23, 1994. The public meeting will be held at the South Coast Air
(SCAQMD) auditorium located 21865 E.
Quality Management District in at 7:00 p.m. Attached to
and be
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, g proect and
this letter are maps whichillustrate therd isroposed zed7within the
the alternatives. project
attached City Council public hearing notice. The alternatives
are outlined as follows:
Alternative 1 - North South Can onreservation
An alternative to the proposed project has been proposed for
consideration and is designed to encourage the preservation of
the Sandstone on area for open mace purr„Pos., The concept
1
involves Arciero and Sons Tract Map No.32400) trading their
property, located east of the middle school, for the west�roler�5±
acres of the RNP Development, Inc. (Tract Map No.5site and
p P y•
Arciero would d 103 evelop
fromsBreaon t
road aCanyon Road to the middle
include a new road ahe former RNP
the excess earth scheduled
school. The proposal would incorporate
for export from the school site. (Please see Alternative No. 1)
nor their
RNP would not build upon southroRNPf s offerormer lof,dedication of this
remaining acreage to thewould be conditioned
75+ acre Sandstone Canyon site to the City, ert
upon the removal of owned
existing map restrictions on prop 1'' went
by RNP, located adjacent to Grand Aven would•beAsrubjectto all City
proposal for the Grand
regulations ansnwould be submitted for reviewpatal rview na•
for pllater date.
Subdivision pl
Gary G. Miller Phyllis E. Papen
Eileen R. Ansari
Gary H. Werner Clair W. Harmony Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
RECYCLED PAPER
Potential benefits of this proposal include, but are not limited
to, the facilitation of the school construction, preservation and
dedication of Sandstone Canyon to the public, and a substantial
reduction of the proposed project's environmental impacts.
Alternative 2 - Preservation of EastfAest Properties
Another design concept for the Commission to consider is the
maintenance of an east -west open space amenity by only permitting
development of Arciero's Tract 32400 site. As an example, in 1991
Arciero and Sons proposed a subdivision of 75 homes upon their
acreage utilizing a previous tentative map. The 1991 map
consists of 85 lots on 47.6 acres. 75 single family lots are
proposed on 19.5 net acres. The earthwork quantities indicate the
need for 393,151.cubic yards of import (presumable from the
school site). 21.2 acres are set aside as open space with the
balance of the acreage, 6.9, devoted to streets. A U.S. Army
Corp. of Engineers' permit and California Department of Fish and
Game permit would be required prior to any modification to the
existing streambed. This alternative provides the opportunity to
facilitate the school development and preserve the east -west
properties now owned by Sasak Corporation (6.7 acres) and RNP
Development (78 acres). (Please see Alternative 2)
The Planning Commission will review the alternatives to the
proposed project on Monday, May 23, 1994. The Commission will
also, that evening, consider the application for Parcel Map No.
24031, as previously noticed.
The City Council has scheduled a public hearing on Tuesday, May
31, 1994 to review the SPMP, the report and recommendations of
the Planning Commission, and consideration of Parcel Map No.
24031.
Please contact the City of Diamond Bar Community Development
Department at (909) 396-5676 to review case materials, provide
comments, and/or receive additional information.
Attachments:
C:\WP51\MEMO\SPMPJNT.MEM
$0W41 robes MA4lC�-Rm
c•»
9XIStINC
OWNE'Fr141 G
a
i
_, 1 �_ =
lz
LL
EL
Q U 2 [ t �f?.i ie ;5 • i i.•ii:� . ; f i „ i :971 2
L '•' ,rifi!!!:it?iillli?:f'IltiSif
D d1A? i
{ _I:T 1 I:i x•. x: e:e F, i*.-' (:i
W
e
I
i
is
���i :'j•j ::x sie i:Tii•iiix x:x' :ii i::
INUlillftlt.l!e!11;i4!ifllCl4!!f
l
F ��"" : �- a;►�Y� .tom - , ��,Q -:,, ,-: � - -
• •.- y.• � � '... �k-T-'�"i� ted ._ -
��-�_ ?int ' -�• -%'� .
kit
�L-. -.:.��.>j e'er -.� ;/_ \• \`.yt �' -
ev
LLJ
e
I
i
is
���i :'j•j ::x sie i:Tii•iiix x:x' :ii i::
INUlillftlt.l!e!11;i4!ifllCl4!!f
l
F ��"" : �- a;►�Y� .tom - , ��,Q -:,, ,-: � - -
• •.- y.• � � '... �k-T-'�"i� ted ._ -
��-�_ ?int ' -�• -%'� .
kit
�L-. -.:.��.>j e'er -.� ;/_ \• \`.yt �' -
ev
0
Q
LO
Im
s/
I
--
Sul
�c—$-mac.
r it
�5 � l d
W
s
y u
T
X + '•� i
i+
1T i�
.� .— i
•i ij
H=
W
i'(ri�!:# �jilil
_!
aYii
1 41
i
yam_
♦ ��
1 ••
s/
I
--
Sul
�c—$-mac.
r it
�5 � l d
W
s
y u
T
t•: I
pr 6-4 :e� •
all
eq
E � :
H
--
/ ,- -' `. ' . ' _.�''" ,�._ — �_ .ISI' ,j (➢). � ���i{ . •'� "
_ -
�- .1�• IF{/ ��
!_.rw,= M ten.
_
H
sA
qp
pU-BIL�l G,
, C HE A Rl.�N
NOTICE OF ) 396,5616■ 21660 E CoPlcy Drive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar,
CA 91765 (909
City of Diamond Bar
ite and other interested Parties'
Property Owners within
a 500 foot radius of subject s
TO:
Development Dept., City of.Diamond Bat mm'
etermina whether
FROM: Community
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, P
ursuant to State Law, that a public hearing will be held by the City Council to d
s shall be approved under the provisions of State Law and the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
or not the subject request( )
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Tuesday, May 31, 1994 7:00 p•m•
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
PLACE OF HEARING, AuditoriumCA 91765
21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar,
• vesting Tentative Tract Map N0. 51407, 2-8
ConditiOoaakal � Permit Na. 91 2;
SUBJECT: Development Agreement Nos- 92-1 and t o g Conditional Use Permit No. 91-5, the South Pointe Master. Plan;
and Oak Tree PermitNo. 92-8; Vesting Tentative Tract No. 32400,
T ,ntativ
e Tract Map No. 51253 and Conditional Use Permit No. 92-]2; Oak Tree Permit No. 92-9;
and Environmental Impact Report No. 92-1 consisting of land uses
known as the South Pointe Master Planml 171 acres in size and
nest for approval of a mined use project, ro ect site is approxi y
REQUEST: This is a req ark, open space and school facilities. The j id View Drive. The
commercial, p on Road, east of Morning Sun Drive, and south of Rap le -family
which include residential, comm spar
of 290,000 square feet; approximately 200 sin -
which
is located north of Pathfinder Road, west of Brea Canyon
ark, and the construction of a middle school.
project proposes to develop 30 acres acre of commercial retailloffice sp
detached residential dwelling units, a 28 acre neighborhoodP
4439 Rhodelia Court, Claremont, CA 91711
1 R -u -P Development, Inc', Anaheim,, CA 92807
APPLICANTS: () Arciero and Son's, Inc., 950 North Tustin, ,C
(3) Sasak Corporation, 858 W. 9th St., Upland, CA 91785
(4) City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Dr. Ste 100, Diamond Bar,
CA 91765
to the terms of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERIVIII`1ATION: Pursuant
act'Re rt has been prepared (SCH No.
wires an Environmental Impact Report. An Environmental Imp Po
determined that this project req
92081040), and is available for public review.
Published in: ril 11, 1994
San Gabriel Valley Tribune: P►P 11, 1994
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin: Aprilpublic input
Public Hearing is being held to focus attention on this project and to allow optimum p
The May 31, 1994 Pu
PLEASE ATTEND AND MAKEYOUR VOWS KNOWN
tion on this subject Please contact the Community Development Department at (909)
To review case materials or for furt,'catio and project in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
396-5676 If you challenge this app ondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
else raised at the public hearing described in flus notice, or in written corresp
to, the public hearing-
SOUTH POINTE MASTER PLAN
The South Pointe Master Plan has been proposed to guide the
development of 171 acres rea. 1 The Master Southn the Pointe
olincorporates
School/ Sandstone' Canyon
tities: the City of Diamond Bar, Walnut -
property owned by five en RNP
Valley Unified School District, Arceiro and Sons, Inc.,
Development, Inc., and Sasak Corporation. The project site is
generally located west of the Orange Freeway and Brea CanyonRoad,
east of Morning Sun Drive, north of Pathfinder Road,
and south of
South Pointe Middle School.
ject, if approved, will be developed, in phases,
The proposed pro
land uses of residential, commercial, park, open
with primary Approximately 82 residential acres are
space, and school. APP are
requested for construction of 200 single family homes, 30 acresproposed
proposed for a future commercial/off ice use, 28 acres are
for open space as a neighborhood public park site, and 31 acres are
proposed for the construction of ect Sobe ull th Pointe
devel ped over dle la
As presently proposed, the proj proposed development plan,
projected ten year period. Under the
all of the residential dwelling units, one-half of the
completedrk site will be within
commercial/office use, era d e The remaining ommercial/office
a projected five year p
use is projected to be completed within the remaining ten year
period. of
ion
To accommodate the propossed.land
d inumber
rovements includethe
system improvements are required. These m p
creation of new local streets within the project site,
it meats to access
road to the school from Brea Canyon Road, improvement
Brea
Canyon Road, and a number of off --site treet. _ an 'nd i --rection
improvements including new signalization.
The proposed project will require the approval and implementation
of Development Agreemen aster Plan,between the city nprojectd the Conditional Use Permit,Oak
applicants, adoption of a
Tree permit, Subdivision approvals and an Environmental Impact
Report. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed project
and has recommended City Council Approval.
The City Council has scheduled a public hearing to review and
provide input on the South Pointe Master Plan on Tuesday, May 31,
1994. For additional inDepartment at please
(90 ) 396-5676.of Diamond
Bar community DevelopmentP
41
All'
.� �t�• a ! _ f-.
4000
I � j7. � �_ �r� . y� � ,c`_•,r- • ,r is ,j J.:
1r r Y
t� �� • '�, O. as
IAN
�� -� • a' y, D 71 - `h L til -1 y
✓iF._ � t _- 1�
Y. !mob ti . g - +/ .. K l'; . ^^' � ✓.( 7' Y '
���''-3 ._ "'AYE► .. � �-w 1�. � .+ ' � f r:�.:�.
�7AL._; �.�, _ s"9.yc s.�. ...-� .d rf�. ay•�jt���':' �ae.�m4i�
INN "cs- t s t"it r � r� `��_ t*'" •�- ys _ � i ,Y ,� �_, •' r`�� i-1`=
��'' °+ Ott .♦ r _ « '> i �.C-
;�.. � •'�+• � � � to � �' ' �� 1.• � ,j a
js.� s rte,; f y -1' � � -. - � �� � 4�a���� - � � �t � `�T�' I ��3r��• ♦a • w1, _..;f ��'
"rte
•'tom.. '
crr
m . L_LJ ►-
� z
z
O
0 0
! LJJ
s C1
2 W
o � N
o Q Q
. .. a Cn Q
a
u
N
0
0
z
N
II
it
i
_ K
r ..
.r
i ism: i•Y:
�
'� .t. �� 1� �
rr
Al.1IN
F3 6 5616
Nylcy,
�nd Bar, CA 91165
Dr'
Ve, Suite 190• Dram°
1660 g Copley Bai . 2
City of DTara .
radius of subject site and other interested Parties
Owners within a � f °Ot
Diamond Bar cil to determine whether
Property City of Diam the City Coun
Comml1�ty Development Dept- � will be held by iamond Bar as follows:
w, that a public heaN° . and the City of D
tog. rsuant to State La of State La
REBY GIVEN, Pu
under the Provisions
iiE be approved '1:00 P.M.
IOTICE IS
request shall DISTRICT
31, 1994
>r not the TIb1E OF pIEAR�C*• Tuesday, May AGEMENT
MAN
DA's AND SOUTH COAST AIR QUAD CA 91'165
PLACE DF FIEA�G• 2Auditorium1965 E Copley Drive, Diam°ad Bim'
Tract 42557 creating
14'19 and Lot 61 of construction of
2p31. 3 ht to restrict the 9 Approval of
EJECT ; Parcel Map NO' Lot 1 of Tract N° a rig 1989 • APp .
is a iequest to merge thl removal Cky Upon incorp°rationRlgh� R�trlcuons on
ro
)posed projec lication requests Whether
REQiJF-ST. The p p 68.10 acres. The W ht was acquired y en Space and Butldin endation of the
That rig held Op • il, 1994 The future
par upon totaling those parcels. ent of currentlyheld for its recomm
a single P e City's abandoiju a Planning published April vacant and exists in a
residential buildings ld require the hearing before the
a 23, 1994, per notice P rrently rasseS which are
the application a tequired hear entl set for W y went. The site is wild g ititent.
the newly arcel. Th The site suPPo an interni
created p be removed is Pres y estate develop undary.
May le fain residential project bo off is deposited into ane and east
building restrictions y sing family within the mems The run of Shotgun Lane
site. is proposed no oak trees develop Curt
d Avenue, west Zoned
RPD -
use of theThere are tesidential south of Grant ro ect site is cu
prim natural natural state. e from the surrounding is located Thep l
drainage The pro] $etnardino County line.
fed by the narural the site.
which traverses to the San lication.
blue line stream Drive and extends eastof this aPP CA 91� l l
of Summitridg Claremont, pct (CEQA), the
20,E"2U, which will not change � Rhodelia Court, ental Quality
AN'r: g -n -P Development, Inc., 4439
e terms of California Environmental
AppLIC DETER�NA.ION: pursuanta negative
declaration.
ENy1RONMENT�' ro ect requires
City has determined that this Q l
6, 1994 Development
published in: a Community
le Tribune: Way lease contact the be limited to raising
San Gabriel Val y 7, 1994 written
Daily Bulletin: May is sub} p you may or in
Inland Valley further information on this and prOJ�t in court, Z this notice,
or for fu lication ring described
materials you
challenge this aPQ ublic hea review case 396-56'16 If y ne else raised at the P the public hearing -
To
Department at (9es or VNovVN
someO or M� YOUR EWS
only those issues you the City
Council at, Q �
correspondence delivered t PLEASE AT -TEND
scALE 1'•2W
TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP N0. 24031
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Iss'rMWrllO nTr rrarfrlMrlM �fawr��ilY��w
au r rMr • LW � Tun � M.IL VIR ■ wa ti arla a e[ awo
r MSI r r rm u MM Iu rro a srrl sL I
I I I // // , i .
Rice'oG— CG'.�a.; 'a i
yrr•
NOTES:
OF Nis
I'pjvwT 6 aSECTIN
AIL4f L7•it NRlU21Mi iii �' miprlU r7iL os 1MELEs
PL% T"a .0, I 3111iE71�Cli , 1. sMMR f1 r IIs 1 TtlIM Et. illu Is
MSEIIQ 'f M ACO�u V M Mon OI LY AIIMRsy
L TME AKA 9FyT SL TMCT a "A" IS L 47 ACKIL
y 711E LKI Or ur 1. iLCI a 11/11 Is L U WKS.
L N. 1I '�( slKll "A"'CKAto N Nis AE WA Is w o 'calls.
S. vpSilO6 Or TMIS FOXEL ASE j"S i0 iLOMIM LLPE IK IMICATED MA U4l
PIAIMAEE 12AM
iIIESINT USE Y wOFUTT Is "CANT L 4
'
I, MMsbsu AS[ TIO pom IS SIMLE FAMILY KSIOEMIIAL. I OMIT po AUK
l ClpMlf I,M $ Is i0 -1 -000 -ILL
LEGEND
j:jrw e M LAIDOEM MEW ST
tsls W.
SOKsdTs CBTOKIK W EXISTIM
sTKEri
sf,awTS ExisTIM E40W IS KMIM
KWWMTS yApy[O 0AWI LIK PIs b
IMIS MEMO Or rMICELy
OWNER/APPLICANT.
p-Np OEVELOpMEw INC.
4,,; pN00ELIA A,ENUE
CLApENONT. CA 91711
�i couytctf
AGENDA
Tuesday, May 3, 1994
7:00 P.M.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Mayor Gary H. Werner
Mayor Pro Tem Clair W. Harmony
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Eileen R. Ansari
Phyllis E. Papen
Gary G. Miller
City Manager Terrence L. Belanger
Interim City Attorney Michael Montgomery
City Clerk Lynda Burgess
Copies of staff reports, or other written documentation relating to agenda items, are on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item,
please contact the City Clerk at (909) 860-2489 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk
a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking
in the Council Chambers.
The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
and encourages you to do the same.
Next Resolution No. 94-19
Next Ordinance No. 03(1994)
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Werner
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Papen,
Miller, Mayor Pro Tem Harmony
and Mayor Werner
2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.
2.1 Introduction by Capt. Larry Waldie with the L.A. County
Sheriff's Department of new personnel to the Walnut
Station.
2.2 Proclaiming May 16-22, 1994 as "PUBLIC WORKS WEEK."
2.3 Proclaiming the Month of May, 1994 as "WATER AWARENESS
MONTH."
2.4 Presentation of Commendations to 3 Individuals for the
creation of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) - Vic
Hosler, Harvey Kramer and Barry Flint.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Please complete a Sneaker's Card and aivw it to
saa ca. c
is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City
Council,
4. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council -
members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at
this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a
future meeting.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - May 9, 1994 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - May 10, 1994 - 7:00
P.M., Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon
Rd.
5.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION- May 12, 1994 - 6:30
P.M., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - May 17, 1994 - 7:00 P.M.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
MAY 3, 1994
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
PAGE 2
6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 5, 1994 -
Approve as submitted.
Requested by: City Clerk
6.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March
14, 1994 - Receive & file.
Requested by: Community Development Director
6.3 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Regular Meeting of
March 10, 1994 - Receive & file.
Requested by: City Engineer
6.4 VOUCHER REGISTER - Approve Voucher Register dated May 3,
1994 in the amount of $490,043.62.
Requested by: City Manager
6.5 TREASURER'S REPORT - Receive & File Treasurer's Report
for Month of March, 1994.
Requested by: City Manager
6.6 REJECTION OF CLAIM - filed by Charles Magdesian on April
19, 1994.
Recommended Action: Reject request and refer matter for
further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk
Manager.
Requested by: City Clerk
6.7 RESOLUTION NO. 94 -XX: A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT AND
JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER
OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006 AND COUNTY
LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROJECT
NUMBER 283-107 - In order to provide funds for operation
and maintenance of street lights on Benfield P1., which
were installed by the developer, it is necessary to
incorporate said street lights into the County LMD 10006
and County Lighting District LLA -1.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council adopt Resolution No. 94 -XX granting consent and
jurisdiction to L.A. County to annex street lights within
the territory described.
Requested by: City Engineer
7. PUBLIC BEARINGS: None
MAY 3, 1994 PAGE 3
8. OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND
ALTERNATIVES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL GENERAL PLAN
- The City Council has been discussing the membership of
the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC). The matters
of total GPAC membership and the number of voting and ex -
officio members continue to be discussed. Further, the
matter of the method for final approval of the General
Plan is also being discussed. Alternatives include City
Council approval, approval of the General Plan currently
being prepared through an election, approval of the
General Plan approved July 27, 1993 through an election,
or indication of support through an advisory election.
Continued from April 19, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council discuss the matters of GPAC membership, GPAC
voting and/or ex -officio members', and method of approval
of the City's General Plan; and, take actions that the
Council deems appropriate.
Requested by: Mayor
8.2 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 02(1994): AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING
TITLE 22 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE BY ADDING NEW
CHAPTER 22.54 AND ESTABLISHING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
STANDARDS - On April 19, 1994, the City Council held a
public hearing, received testimony, waived first reading,
and approved as amended, Ordinance No. 2, 1994.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council approve for second reading and adopt Ordinance 02
(1994).
Requested by: Community Development Director
8.3 INTERSECTION MODIFICATION ON GRAND AVENUE AT DIAMOND BAR
BOULEVARD AND ON GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE - On October 6,
1992, the Council awarded a design services contract to
Dwight French & Associates, Inc., (DFA) for
reconstruction/rehabilitation of Grand Ave. from the
easterly City limit to Golden Springs Dr. in the amount
of $45,700. On December 7, 1993, the City executed a
Memorandum of Understanding with the L.A. County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for approved
funding of the Grand Ave. Traffic Signalization/Arterial
Improvement Project. Since the arterial improvements/
intersection modification should be constructed as part
of the Grand Ave. Resurfacing Project, it has become
necessary for DFA to design/ coordinate this effort.
Continued from April 19, 1994.
MAY 3, 1994
PAGE 4
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract
amendment with Dwight French & Associates, Inc. to
increase the contract amount from $45,700. to $61,000.
Requested by: City Engineer
8.4 DISCUSSION RE: COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE FOR LIBRARY
SERVICES - Continued from April 19, 1994
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Mayor
appoint a Library Services sub -committee of the City
Council, comprised of two members of the Council.
Requested by: Councilwoman Ansari
8.5 MATTER OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FROM FORMER CITY
ATTORNEY - Continued from April 19, 1994.
Requested by: Mayor Pro Tem Harmony
9. NEW BUSINESS:
9.1 STATUS REPORT ON SISTER CITIES On April 22, 1994,
Mayor Werner and Councilwoman Ansari met at a duly
noticed meeting of the Sister City sub -committee. At
this meeting the Sub -Committee considered: Program
objectives in establishing a sister city; review and
consideration of the establishment of Sister City status
with Bucharest, Romania; and presentation by Mr. Michael
Li, of Congressman Jay Kim's Office, recommending the
establishment of a Sister City with the City of Haicheng,
China.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council consider adoption of Bucharest, Romania and the
City of Haicheng, China as Sister Cities.
9.1.1 Presentation by Angie Thompson Re: Bucharest
Street Kids Shelter Project
Requested by: M/Werner
9.2 ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - In
accordance with the requirements of Prop. 111 for State
Gas Tax Fund and the criteria stipulated by the Prop. C
Local Return Guidelines, local jurisdictions must certify
that it has in place a pavement management. system (PMS).
This is to foster the cost-effective use of public funds
prior to expending Prop. C funds. The system needs to
provide an overview of the condition of the total street
system, a means of documenting street maintenance/
rehabilitation needs, and a means of rationally
prioritizing street improvement projects in terms of
MAY 3, 1994 PAGE 5
needs and cost-effectiveness. To accomplish this
work, it is necessary to retain the services of a
qualified engineering firm. In response to the City's
Request for Proposal, the Selection Committee received
and evaluated four (4) proposals.
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City
Council award a professional engineering services
contract to Dwight French and Associates in an amount not
to exceed $37,020.00, plus a contingency amount of
$3,000.
Requested by: City Engineer
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
11. CLOSED SESSION: May convene to consider: Matters of pending
Litigation (G.C. 54956.9), Personnel (G.C. 54957.6), or
purchase/sale of real property (G.C. 54956.8). Records not
available for public inspections.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
The Diamond Bar City Council will hold a Regular Meeting at
the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium,
located at 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, May 3, 1994.
Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda.
I, TOMMYE A. NICE, declare as follows:
I am the Deputy City Clerk in the City of Diamond Bar; that
a copy of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar
City Council, to be held on May 3, 1994 was posted at their
proper locations.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and
that this Notice and Affidavit was executed this 29th day of
April, 1994, at Diamond Bar, California.
/s/ Tommye Nice
Tommye Nice, Deputy City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar