Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/1993CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Mayor — Gary G. Miller Mayor Pro Tem — Phyllis E. Papen Councilman — John A. Forbing Councilman — Gary H. Werner Councilman — Dexter D. MacBride Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. 1. CLOSED SESSION: 2. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: Next Resolution No. 93-02 Next Ordinance No. 01(1993) 5:00 P.M. Litigation -Government Code 54956.9 Personnel - Government Code 54957.6 6:00 P.M. Mayor Miller Reverend Mark Hopper, Evangelical Free Church of Diamond Bar. Councilmen MacBride, Forbing, Werner, Mayor Pro Tem Papen, Mayor Miller 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council - members are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 4. COUNCIL COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1.1 Planning Commission - February 8, 1993 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.2 Traffic & Transportation Commission - February 11, 1993 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.3 President's Holiday - February 15, 1993 - City Offices Closed. 5.1.4 City Council Meeting - February 16, 1993 - 6:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 5.2.1 Amendment to Page 13 of Regular Meeting of December 15, 1993. FEBRUARY 21 1993 PAGE 2 5.2.2 Regular Meeting of January 19, 1993. 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated February 2, 1993 in the amount of $533,976.01. 5.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - Receive & File Treasurer's Report for the Month of December, 1992. 5.5 TRAFFIC f TRANSPORTATIOND1992MMISSION Receive file. Regular Meeting o 5.6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE 5.6.1 Regular Meeting of November 23, 1992 - Receive & file. 5.6.2 Site Tour Master Plan/Study Session/Regular Meeting of December 14, 1992 - Receive & file. 5.7 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Linda Roseli January 20, 1993. Recommended Action: Reject request and refer matterRiskor further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Manager. S IN THE 5.8 ACCEPTANCE OF TmeetingAofJuine 16ON F 1992WAC Council awarded CITY - At their parkway the contract for purchase and installation ofl� , the trees to Artistic Landscape and Engineering, lowest bidder. Work ready to be accepted. dfor a total cost of $28,300 an Recommended Action: Accept work performed and authorize the City Clerk to file Notice of Completion. 5.9 ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ON TEMPLE of VE y 7N THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - At their meeting 1992, Council awarded a contract for construction Flow landscape improvements lowTemple b dder . to in the amount of Engineering, Inc., $28,915. Improvements have been completed. Recommended Action: Accept work performed and authorize the City Clerk to file Notice of Completion. IL 5.10 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF OF THE CITY OF OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURa man CERTAIN ITEMS ON THE CITY'S BEHALF - The City opportunity, s tive through the Alternonsoreduel by thelcle AQMD AFto Fleet Demonstration Program sp evaluate the Ford uruItais recommendednd Chevrolet uthat themina City fuel flexible sedans Council authorize purchase of a Ford Taurus through the a not -to -exceed cost of statewide purchasing program at FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 3 $13,000. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX authorizing the Department of General Services of the State of California to purchase a fuel flexible vehicle (FFV) on the City's behalf and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the statewide purchasing program. 5.11 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - AB939 requires the City to prepare, adopt and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) which identifies how the City will divert, through a combination of source re- duction, recycling and composting programs, 25% of solid wastes from landfill disposal by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX support- ing L.A. County's Solid Waste Management Action Plan and authorize the City Manager to send a letter requesting the L.A. County Board of Supervisors and Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts to reaffirm their commitment to resolving the County's waste disposal crisis. 5.12 FULL PERFORMANCE BOND EXONERATION FOR CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AT 800 S. GRAND AVENUE, TRACT 51079 - The City desires to exonerate the bond posted for full performance of the Subdivision Agreement for Tract No. 51079 (800 S. Grand Avenue). Recommended Action: Approve the exoneration of the Faithful Performance Bond posted for off-site improve- ments at 800 S. Grand Ave. in the amount of $100,000. 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC., 6.1 PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 AS YMCA MONTH - Present to Jerry White, Branch Director. 6.2 CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION - Present to Patrice Halstead, Suzanne Bradshaw, Hoshang Rastravan and Joe Ingram for their efforts in helping apprehend a robbery suspect at the Bank of America on Sunday, November 22, 1992. 7. OLD BUSINESS: 7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF METAL BEAM GUARD RAILING ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF GRAND AVENUE AT FEBRUARY 2, 1993 8. PAGE 4 ROLLING KNOLL ROAD, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - At the meeting of December 15, 1992, staff was directed to prepare the bid specifications for the installation of metal beam guard railing along the north side of Grand Ave. At this time, specifications for the project have been prepared. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving plans and specifications for the installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing along the north side of Grand Ave. at Rolling Knoll and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the project for bids. 7.2 SOLID WASTE PERMITS - Verbal presentation to be given by AA/Butzlaff. NEW BUSINESS: 8.1 BOND COUNSEL SELECTION FOR SEWER DISTRICT - As part of its overall responsibilities for the financing of an assessment district to install sewers in The Country Estates, the City needs to retain a series of professional consultants to provide opinion and assistance in the preparation and sale of tax exempt assessment bonds. One of the professional consultants needed to accomplish the financing of an assessment district is a bond counsel. The City has received four proposals from: 1) Brown, Diven & Hentschke; 2) Jones Hall Hill & White; 3) Best, Best & Krieger and 4) Arter, Hadden, Lawler, Felix & Hall. The City Manager, City Attorney and City Engineer will be interviewing the four bond counsel candidates on February 2, 1993. Recommended Action: Recommendation will be made to the City Council at its meeting of February 2, 1993. 8.2 RIGHT TURN OVERLAP SIGNALIZATION ON DIAMOND BAR BLVD. AT GRAND AVE. - To further improve traffic circulation at the intersection of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., a right turn arrow signal for motorists traveling north- bound on Diamond Bar Blvd. and attempting to make right turns at Grand Ave. is proposed. This matter was discussed and approved by the Traffic & Transportation Commission on January 14, 1993. Recommended Action: Approve the installation of a right turn arrow signal for motorists traveling northbound on Diamond Bar Blvd. and attempting to make right turns at Grand Ave. 8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING "NO RIGHT TURN, 4:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M., MONDAY -FRIDAY" SIGNS ON ROLLING FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 5 KNOLL ROAD AND COUNTRY VIEW DRIVE AT GRAND AVENUE - In order to mitigate cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Dr., Country View Dr. and Rolling Knoll Rd. from Diamond Bar Blvd. to Grand Ave., the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommended the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m.- 7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Rd. and Country View Dr. at Grand Ave. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 P.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Rd. and Country View Dr. at Grand Ave. 8.4 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CONSENTING TO THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING "NO STOPPING ANYTIME" SIGNS AND ESTABLISHING A 112 -HOUR PARKING" SIGNS ON COLIMA ROAD EAST OF LEMON AVENUE - In order to provide additional parking for delivery trucks to load and unload and allow smaller vehicles to maneuver within the current parking lot, Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe requested removal of the current "No Stopping Anytime" signs on Colima Rd. east of Lemon Ave. In lieu of the current signs, the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommends the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs at this location. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Rd. east of Lemon Ave. 8.5 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING, 6:00 A.M. - 8:00 A.M., MONDAY -FRIDAY," SIGNS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF FALLOWFIELD DRIVE BETWEEN BREA CANYON CUT-OFF ROAD AND PASCO COURT - Shortage of onsite parking has required employees of First Mortgage Corp. to park on residential streets such as Fallowfield Dr. and Pasco Ct. Based on concerns from residents in the area, Council previously took action to restrict parking. The Traffic & Transportation Commission recommends the additional installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.- 8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs directly in front of First Mortgage Corp. located on Fallowfield. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.- 8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallowfield Dr., directly in front of First Mortgage Corp. and install up to 50 ft. of red curbing at the intersection of Fallowfield Dr. and Diamond Bar Blvd., Pasco Ct. & Fallowfield Dr. and at driveway entrances to assure clear sight distances. FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 6 9. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters can be heard. 9.1 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF 1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - The City has scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and budgets for use of Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). Staff expects to receive approximately $220,619 in federal funds as a participant in the 1993-94 L.A. Urban County CDBG Program. The funds may be used for a variety of Community Development activities which develop a viable urban community principally for persons of low -and moderate -income. The purpose of the public hearing is to solicit testimony and receive presentations from public service organizations requesting funds as well as interested citizens prior to taking action on a final statement of program objectives. Recommended Action: Open the public hearing, receive testimony and approve the proposed project and budget recommendation and direct that these materials be forwarded to the Community Development Commission. 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: 5 PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes ref name and address as written above. Signature r -L -U7 RY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE:'' PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect i name and address as written above. Sig ure 6f To: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT. w - - � A, -t Y REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL GfrY CLERK ---_-- DATE: PHONE: expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my ame and address as written above. Signature - F*--] VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: (--n in A _``ka rn CITY CL RK r plojir � Uu.DATE: PHONE: I� { go -L 6-6zzV1j, I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect ml. name and address as written above. J Signature ti AVOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO CITY CLERK FROM: �M DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: ( �l % E ���_-- _ � „n r-_. �_ . f AGENDA #/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes refl name and address as written above. i �C i Signature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TC CITY CLERK FR )M: K iA i h, DATE: J AD )R=SS: 1 C e ^" Int. Y xx c mina i l PHONE: OF aANIZATION: W1`t1 VVt,�,-t .AG : -:NIDA #/SUBJECT: ..l �' t: �t � � �Y► �.1�� ; il'b„I,f�ru_-:� � `l � 1 �J I e> pect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect name and address as written above. Si ature VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: f�<Azrt �Z %-/ //V DATE: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature IBJ TO F -R( M: ADC RE:SS: OR( ANIZATION: AGE ZA #/SUBJECT: VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK DATE: PHONE: I exPect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes name and address as written above. reflect my Signature { VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: -Z--2— % ADDRESS: =� i �� ]Ji�'d� %'I l.l_ p PHONE: i ORGANIZATION: AGENDA #/SUBJECT: i--IAAc' I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes refer name and address as written above. Signature c Li J TO F'RC M: ADC 9ESS: ORG ANIZATION: AGEI IDA #/SUBJECT. v ULUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK T DATE: C —� PHONE: i. I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. name and address as written above. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my Sign re 7615511425A - 9H -AD -32A (12/72) GC,` I L".1 Pnilk[TV f-NC7 1 ^0 A Kl^r-i i -e% 001 PC, 1992 F$OM: TLEC MANAGER W Wk 141C AL NIC SUBJECT: Comm I would like to bring to your attention the commendable actions of four citizens in apprehending a strong-arm robbery suspect and recovering two thousand dollars in stolen money. 11 .9 t I believe their actions are worthy of consideration for some I believe ficial 1 re ficial recognition by the City. qAex; at 10:55 A.M., a female employee irant, 20965 Colima Rd., Diamond tking a deposit into the )f America, 2845 S. Diamond Bar t;o COW ' ld accosted her. The suspect from her, containing $2,038.00, ,", 1stead, 2444 S. Diamond Bar -e bank and observed the incident. "10 Pri chase. Suzanne Bradshaw, 1957 r in the bank parking lot and the suspect running, she also 1pl�T_ he UNOCAL Service Station next to e who also witnessed the 2875 S. Diamond bar Blvd., the pursuit. They witnessed the ing the money over the rear fence Bradshaw stopped the car and R`as'travan began chasing the d still "dogging" the suspect in path causing him to retreat. :.he suspect and summoned the aid Rrvice station, Joe Ingram, 21647 staining the suspect. Commendable Actions of Diamond Bar Residents -2- December 2, 1992 It is commendable that in this age of "non-involvement" by so many that these four good citizens would come to the aid of another, at no little risk to themselves. Their actions truly deserve recognition by the community. Attached is a copy of the crime report. LCM:gr COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FILE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT'- RECORDSASTATISTICSWREAU'S USE ONLY I Cf]MQI AINIT DCDfIDT ACTIVE ACTION INACTIVE INDEX PENDINGI 1 Yo ( - INFO NO No o/ ) A"' ) Anasts No of ♦� D.tt..ttlom URN (FIN Na) �� �� I , / �[ PAGE I OF V /) ��� O L•• CLASWICATION CITY 2N RES PHONE (AREA CODE) BUiE1ESS ADDRESS 7-09 (D I- --LIMA �p • go 6 t5i2 —5 TAa tj G A Am -- 2-I boo. C CLASSIFICATION MIDDLE SEF RACE DOE C-pF1YNEK1 RESIDENCE ADDRESSIIP /3157 s. & Dir—c-r- � s � - 1 �/ clrr .0 A/ 6 0104-151-4BELOW RES 91,aNE(AE =- S'ba3 BUSKtESSADDRES5 NP a It Domestic Violence: DATE TIME wr Ot OCLURRENCE k0. CITY � lAM rr 2N R9`17R9o9—SE'S—IY(y Weapon Used VES ) NO � / - t•Z— 1 1193, N t?,A Y MINT VIASEcrr. TBIE pEPUTv No k/YES 4 1 LOC I I STA T I VEN ( ) REOUE STED LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE 2 4 S, ViA Mo �vD f11q R #31. �� J,4 /� 13,4 TYPE OF LOCAT/Q . ` �/ le rnACT CODE.: V—VICTIM. W—WFTNBBe. ItiNFORMANT_ —.n- Nn 2M 91 � RES PHp1tE(MEACOpE) LDDELAST NAME Gk N 0X FIRST keSmi4 MIDDLE SEX FACE DOS •CHEYK g�G 1 AESIOENCEADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY ZIP CITY 2N RES PHONE (AREA CODE) BUiE1ESS ADDRESS 7-09 (D I- --LIMA �p • cY AAtity D 6A ZIP BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) .. 1 NICKNAME LOGE LAST j(AME T(� '/•I1j CLOTHING 1 A4 (W SAI v tZ 'S, l�e.c,c.eT f � - s791eey CHARGE FFI�� IRIS -` MIDDLE SEF RACE DOE C-pF1YNEK1 RESIDENCE ADDRESSIIP /3157 s. & Dir—c-r- � s � - 1 �/ clrr .0 A/ 6 0104-151-4BELOW RES 91,aNE(AE =- S'ba3 BUSKtESSADDRES5 NP a RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY ZIP 2094S' Ca LI -owlA LODE k0. CITY � lAM rr 2N R9`17R9o9—SE'S—IY(y BUS ►tHONE1MEA COOL) W FM l Di LAST NAME _ q5 7 -le C MIDDLE SE RACE w;-z�-s�E DO.S CN CK l RESIDENGi A00RE36 CLOTHING MGM - Lrtr /Amcm 2M 91 � RES PHp1tE(MEACOpE) 7R BusmaSS BODY TrIK cliv ZIP UNKNOWN ( 1 STORED ( 1 I IMPOUNDED ( ) BUS PHONE (MEA CODE) C LAST NM'= FIRST WDDLE DRIVER S LICENSE (STATE E NO ) J No f aA T %LQ A5'70 7Jb(60 CITYRES -5E`E—r16 /6zi'7 MAPLs'6r2�Z/c DR. LSI k��/ ►HONE (AREA CODE) - (9- 7 /3 BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY ZIP BUS PHHONE (AREA CODE) — H� I EvEil ^ _ NEIDN�Q� WEIGHT DcOjI3Q 2 .'I AG%0 WNEAE OETAMIED ` LITS 5 OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES' NICKNAME B LNG _ CLOTHING 1 A4 (W SAI v tZ 'S, l�e.c,c.eT f � - s791eey CHARGE MAIN Her �—V A ► WEAPONUSEDIYAAJ S CODE LAST NAME FVIS1 MIDDLE DRIVER -5 LICENSE (STATE a NO.) NP a RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY ZIP RES PHONE (AREA CODE) BUS" SS ADDRESS 1 CITY ZIP SUS PHONE (AMA CODE) SE II RACE NAMI EYES. HEKiMV wEIONT DOB AGE WHEREDETAVED .A NICKNALi OR CITE NO BOOKINGNO OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES . CLOTHING MGM - YAB( CHAR" WEAPON USED VEHICLE USED YES 1 ) NO 7R HARE BODY TrIK COLOR BY DEPUTY UNKNOWN ( 1 STORED ( 1 I IMPOUNDED ( ) T 16 DEPUTY BADGE NO LICENSE (STATE a NP 1 V IN /FRAME No r .. REGWEREDOVMR STATION UNITI N rt7 ILVALPJ13 IDENTrtrtNGCNWCTEIeStIC3 yP_ pKEpA �a eA�F I d 16 BC - P t o YES I ) GARAGE NAME a PHONE MO( A$jI NMFNT pi is, VICTIM DESIROIA TES M OF PROSECUTIDN RVI(TIMp YES( I E 1 A P NO SPECAL REOI "ST DISTRIBUTION - NO 1 ) FOIL 01% NO 84 5U9EC ErYIB.EtT TIME ARREST REVIEW YES (X% TTSIC BY DATE - TIME SECTY APPROVED BY SUBMITTED Ho ( ) I r4*1 76C30OF•SH•R-49 (Rev. 1/861 PS 1/86 USE FOR PROPERTY/NARRATIVE AS NEEDED �Z M(P ,., /l - Z.Z- J `7e Dl` I-- DET( ) —*URN ( JZ� 170 2 Z-7— Q Lf + �UT CHECKEDYES ( > EVIDENCE(coos-EV)HELD YES MARKED TAGGED. SEALEOA PLACED mum wa ( ) EY LEpOER MCIC CII ETC NO ND ) IN STATION EVIDENCE LOCKER OUTSIOE ( ) REFRKi. ( ) - PIP. PAGE Np 9 IF BURGLARY: FORCE USED YES( I PONT OF ENTRY -DOOR ( I WINDOW( ) ROOF ( ) OTHER NO( ) PROPERTY: (TOTAL VALUE) RECOVEREDZoV. DAMAGED PROPERTYCODE: S—stolen R—recovered L—lost F—found E—embezzle0—damaged (Use All Applicable Codes: For Example. N Property Is Both Stolen & Recovered. Code Is SIR) PAMATY DPEd CODE ITEM DUAN INCLUDE KNOOF AIITIOLE. TRADE NAME. IOENTIFYING NUMOERS.-PHYSICAL OESCMPTION. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL. COLOR. CONDITION. AGE AND PRESENT MARKET VALUE SSPM lln VALUE a/R Mne, uAJ(W1 57ArZrS c,494Z-0CY rCQr^J $Zo3��' 6V* 1.1 ►9A,jr< u f A N1 eY4 e -A `" 1A « -K r34s).J*SS Awhrr' ` PA dnAO-dM XgLK W TNt- 6vX it - 7-' *t <7034 EV Z - #A,N14 *-/- A.ma-A i yq /92,i S !G f) /— los , r A G . - 3 SrhM I�IC.M vivvtw 3 ;2 LV e M - i z &u.Ajt> w17,, q ParTAj.AJId.VG Nf StisPjrtT- m4r c N 6A 2 CAAJ O CA L V(< -T IM ' L WAS A-50 7W6A.C. Vl e -TIM 2 T-01,0 Mg�' TNAT SCREENING FACTORS YES NO YES N 1. SUSPECT IN CUSTODY 7. GENERAL SUSPECT DESCRIPTION 2. SUSPECT NAMED/KNOWN S. GENERAL VEHICLE DESCRIPTION 3. UNIQUE SUSPECT IDENTIFIERS 9. UNIQUE M.O. OR PATTERN 4. VEHICLE IN CUSTODY 10. SIGNIFICANT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 5. UNIQUE VEHICLE IDENTIFIERS 11. TRACEABLE STOLEN PROPERTY 6. WRITER/REVIEWER DISCRETION 12. MULTIPLE WITNESSES PART I STATISTICAL INFORMATION ADDITIONAL NMNER OF CRIMES1) A VICTIMS. WEAPONS CODE ( ) ARTICLES THROWN () CAUSTIC CHEMICALS ( ) f1UB/BLUNT INSTRUMENT ( ) ORuGS/NOXK=GAS ( ) FIRE/EXPLOSIVES ()j HANDS/ FEET /FIST'ETC, ( ) KNIFE/CUTTING INSTRUMENT ( ) POISON () REVOLVER/RSTOL ( ) RIFLE ( ) SHOTGUN ( ) STRANGULATION ( ) VEHICLE ( ) UNKNOWN/OTHER PROPERTY TYPE OF PROPERTY STOLEN RECOVERED TYPE OF PROPERTY STOLEN RECOVERED JEWELRY f f CLOTHING/FURS S i LIVESTOCK f f CONSUMABLE GOODS f S LOCAL STOLEN VEHICLES S S CURRENCY/NOTES f Q S O MISCELLANEOUS f 3 FIREARMS f f OFFICE EQUIPMENT f f HOUSEHOLD GOODS S f TV/RADIO/STEREO S f COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESSHERIFFDEPARTMENT I COMPLAINT REPORT CONTINUATION INUATION LIEN: '_ DA4 7 A77_044 -7 77—a4% S CODE: S . su_spect, SJ -subject, • P' patient S/ V- suspect/victim SIJ - subject/victim CODE: V • victim, W - witness FIRST PACE OF COD[ CODNO. OF LAST MAANE/� tl I M ,LJ AD is `! /1 No. OI FIRST u� MIDDLE SEX RACE J;0W Y j� IH'V� CHECK DAY PNON[ RILOW RESIDENCE ADDRESS /gs� �JN1Ti STA A. Tile. CITY P 'DIAMaN>D f3Aa If"?!a S- RLS. PHONE (ARCA COD[I -��- 7-930 BUSINESS ADDRESS 7 LIP CITY &ACCA)T?A LIP 91410 10 BUS. PHONE (AREA COD[) Int-993-tiz�o X CODE 1.' r•+ No.� o► `f LAST NAME Pl�"DAAVA-Q FIRST 4 MA,AJG MIDDLE Ar CHECK REI[ R'AC_[l �i4S� R[SID[NC[ ADDRESS S t- r CITY LIP 4(% ii ow RES. PHONIC(AREA COD[) SVBIN[Sf ADDIMSO _-f/•N'`/757 S. Y I A. W N D 13A P— 134 CITY LIP a- t7i►�1s.�twv�? 6.- 176 SUB. PHONE (AREA C00[1 9a — Coca � I I LAST M NZ FI•/R}STT�/ MIDDLE S BMX M,AC`E/) CHECK OAY NO. 1 OF Vll AKA/NICKNAME - l PHONE v—,I R[SIO[NC[ ADDRESS iN. f CITY PA. V?AM ONO LIP 454E rr/� BELOW R[t. PHONE (AREA COOLI 9� - ��r-4388 ADDRESS ADORB SIP 5- S, 'DJA-MONp 6A CI -PINa LIP /3Ak 9174� SUB. PHONE (ARCA CODE) 09— Sgt? --?77i = CODE: S . su_spect, SJ -subject, • P' patient S/ V- suspect/victim SIJ - subject/victim CODA I I LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE DRIVCM'S LICENSE (STATE R NO.) No. OI RESIDENCE ADDRESS CIT' LIP R[f. PHONE IAREA COD[) SYSINCSS ADDRESS CITY LIP - BUS. PHONE (ARSA COO[) RE I HAIR_ "YES NIGHT W[Ia1HT (RAC[ I I I O.O.S. AEM W" OR OGS[RVABLC PHYSICAL OOOITIII AKA/NICKNAME - CITE No. BOOKING No. CLOTHING WORN = MAIN CHARGE - WCAPON USED CODE LAST MANE FIRST I I MIDDLE DRIVER'S LICENSE ISTATE A No.) NO. OF 1 RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY - - ',ZIP IEE. PION[ 1 AREA CODE) SUBINSSS ADDRESS CITY LIP BUG. PHOMC (AREA COOK) SQ MCE EYSS "EIGHT WEIGHT D.O.B. (MAIN I I I AGE WM[RCDS I o1NCO OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL OODITISS CITE AKA/NICKNAMC BOOKING NO. CLOTHING WORN - MAIM CIIAN{E WEAPON USED COD[ LAST MANE FIRST II MIDDLE DRIVER'S LICENSE (STAT[ A No.1 NO. 01 MSIDK94M ADDRESS CITY LIP RCS. P/ONC ( AREA COD[) GUINNESS ADDRESS CITY LIP SUS. PION[ ( AREA CODE) SIX RAC[ CYII IWGNT WEI{HT O.O.S. ("AIR I I AGE WHERE DETCITZ I on OBGERVNIi PHYSICAL OOOITIy OAIMCD AKA/MICKNAMC BOOKING No. CLOTHING WOMN MAIN CHANGE WEAPON USSO VEHICLE ufED IN calm; Will 1 110( 1 rR. wKE I Boo* Trn COLOR LICENSE ( STATE ANO. V.I.N./FRAMC No. UNKNOWN( 1 pR[D OI ) IMPOUNDED( CHP ISO Y[S( )I 6ARAGL NAM; O FMO"; IDENTI►YIN[ CHAIUCT[RNCS I SUBMITTED NO( ) REPORT CONTINUATION NARRATIVE URN t41 -L SGTC611817 110485i-el6 il� �� PGa Yd`s "CA) y CS/R-i sNE" jAlp T)4w r A7 z 6q, f Mn A 7LSL 10A S r, ' 3 96`�" W A S /��2 rTPr1 R :1 T4.., T' x� I z �.. 6s ?' !3 - 2,) Ca AJ- Al A40AXY 61A I AVQ JS L S /wg7Zv4AArtS 7)/Z-dp7)49-'-/5A,-J4 oil AM ;2 l- s / nor vIu D /3A R 6LVD, s e' ' d tr s rzr IP ��0 7Z 18' pep c35/T j3.j vN fjA P Z- e. 14 7 Pr4,")Q TWO A4LS,,eIe-IN ;54TYtjA✓rJ /LS t,,) 51 — A -u" Ta dro<oper 2m S7 -6p 1S-Ic� StiIS csc cAuSr Pbr PADS L PM IZA t _(Px oj i7Wc S RA L S 10 1? -C 0 two VJA u51�g Arm I✓ex r n -v l ca 2.tr r t L,1 � S s gcT i A' Mv� vim, T -01e YICT i nn AA)D &!�.,} 569 ASR- ' .J Rtom!N6 ,HAivD YiU TPa r,,'C 5L,%spe-<-r PAD .STu r Y' ,ate 0 TL11S ArJ GOUV P491 5-09� r„! / T N453S i3 OSNr4--d C 4J AS /A7 PM CA A- 00A) -�- PA O-x�!) G L0T of ?yl 64 -'JK Q� ICA WMEW Z Yc2<. -kn 5 L4 re4r sk sP�T— J *4O S b 09 r l 1%f, /.4 -ro 77 -fir L077 QA f"'unJ Q cA L 4 i 714 /3 AJ14. WrTAI C5 AASTAAVA.4J /S A 100-Vicr 7'-? N fl ti X72 VtcAr- WIT. jaA" D spa AW Tb C 'r AM lj, 0 PM IZA t _(Px REPORT CONTINUATION __ NARRATIVE PAGE - OF URN 9Z- /'"' gELP CA f rtt 29- 7144 S c1SPtst'r'. MeV M cz' WIT14 A " ASO M LAM ?3JI ' r4, Av A)ue tr Suers �G I'A'-:57- D WA I C40 S C TO 'Irk S C /N 14M V -J. 3 0-5HALJ Str S u O'Cr 7 A OL" 0 2 cg.Qokco CAM., Q Sl1 tr S A" "rb KzlrrAlevAr /� tt ? ( CCT` v 0 T S -r AA V t ig pr j4rAjjp1 ♦�/ TrIL� I A�1 iC /1Ar20N46 W i4.) 7Vc t,k) 5/6 -/Z:> r j r K -4 9- r,7/" eek .Y�7'•. 1 r W PAP dcc Nr Ga -r W N Q S A u S Su -T .nTl' Z tr SL45Pf<T A K-eW 71A4e3 <'--7 t # 5 .V G 141AI SW AAM, &tql ?")2 A'1 A eJ szl rD AvvD $ j T .#j f C T1;,4. rk4O- ' ,,-J a CAL S7,A —,_ ! S 4'GT" _Aip, ryr S-l-AT'iQN'S u e. r. w r TeJ OS /.-J G /Z -qM T61,0 MC W dr j -b t<cW PACE (o OF REPORT CONTINUATION - NARRATIVE URN p21, ,4 9- Z92.2.O r^j r Cs -r W i �e-.^JE-2 A,^J Q Ta !jD N r Q -A39 - AS IREAR dl - 815' T-04.2 .50247517. lb Sir. 5.17 SAM wI TMeSS�,%j 040 Mr MJAj fy Der1 t T AA -2 ` 7Z W(TNe-rS RASTAIQJ* Ar i -ME' s Vic At 2 f- 7ts1R Cr W AS Md-rO PA OV Gz7qvr W .tj t fr- v 8 3 A Mv 570 t cT 98r Sin -off G A I2N1 y — :1-11 . C A ^lD 6 CC k !A 'v- 4th v N 76R288M-Sh R-313- PS 10-82 . . t "'"o .'._.ART HENT CRIME ANALYSIS INFORMATION rFORM RlRN�� --,9--�z�z�- a c.� amgw,P1, am ir6 AN S� T P Qm AJ A lo�Ro �iusPtt:T. ....._ e uorowa 1 CCLLAII It LOW e am= 4 irouaw a 14AS TM t U NShL0 a Flam 0 a I 4 TeNIND W 1 f" a UNKNOWN •' 1 AnOwnAft a SPAJM a am I 4 aUiC" f viii 1! 7 OIALV a iRATTOR 0 oREM1/ 11 NIM CML 00 •woom El El 1 Amwpom= 10 [3t WK El 11 f me== El 11 1 ummrmm a mamm 0 PMA 7 MAN • FALLOW f TAW= 10 WWTMB= 11 WPJNM u i s4_ eui� 0 UNKNOWN 1 atA11n aI= 4 o0A7w i uwmL! f MOUETA" 7 AIDE RIM a UN!"VEN COON i 11 MLITAW OWOONII 7t NETS / AMPUTA71Id1 a PooffuL aCANiOMM 7tppecomm f CA PRa 1K Keit X STPAQi 4 NiARII�W AD V WAVYYi MINDS o0Lp1 � $PAfTIC MOVL — 7TRANevaimE WAL-29 (Rev. 3/89). - Li r-1 • uNo�owlt + aROKEN IMP Ll El It VIA= f WON 4 CROo m I D mvw 0 "PANY10E 1201.000 iam= 0 mum N aLVm Go 11 WrANEO 7! 0 ui?Ow1! 1 ACCINT am -mu s a LJiR 4 M MILL • mm • PAW 7 GLOW • a Lmm • aTIRTw 1LXUM 0 UNKNOWN Ho 1 Lei ! omm • 1Ni1OWN t WEOALLMT ! aUPELLETOUN � • sooLr1a11cE 4 DOME f CRJ�f1,1AORiN • iWNONN 7 1aUfE 0 CUTWTAD N0T1 W +0 lN710tJ�1 11 WALATEDOUN U 864AATED KMM ti TCy&" u Tw Hmpe 12 VIAPOY PIFALTURER om RiARm t UNKNOWN I ALTERED $7QOK t AUTOMATIC ! RUE arta Al aoLTAMVIN i C1sIL7dERidQi DomfisAmm • DEaR.nw e PIww 10 1EWOLVw 11 aAWID40W u MILE am N oRn OAUOE � Mon LOT" i 1"mPlomm 0 tN•OW N aAVOW N Kmmm OA00l11 O HUNT9 a M wrom 1 N POCKET N aWRC1lLADE LYT" I- 4 4 V0Nrr RJCTDN 1RE 0 OEMltT • 0>d.rOOL0T0E 71M101o11 1 NDLNTNAL 0 WIN I" A =WAMICUTI W S FAM C pi sDNRN. 0 WRALABOLATW E ScH=011CLM00 IF 1lCrr0AACINTER 0 rMuTo"" N VACANTIOT 1 wAT90LMOF �+ 01T*gC*11M11 RE"0/ITML 1 AF�.IRYfR ! ourl�c a MDELl10M i 110J001JJ0 W 7 N0*92BDENAML 10 lANOdrNMICE 11 EAR t! 1MPIE10orplel q CAMOCC RARM W GTERN07RIM ti ENTE11TAwREC1MAT 10 FAST r000. 17 GAS ITATUaM ' u NOTINAIM& is NDU01M1oofts s0 r LXLGR a MARKET s0 MNI MART !4 MWN01TRUCTAJDT A rr1ARNAMEWDMAL all PULJC lULDNI v REL I" 1U0.D011 all REs7ALINANt i RETAL111=8 00 RETAIL s6NAL"A01 s, 0omm a VO4CL940MWL Is VEssELAMW s< VDEd111001Oi M ILIUM 0 u"9001111 1 ATM ! 01ED10011 A DNM RSI 4 OARAOWPVAAMEA 0 IQTOl1EN 0 tALVORI' RCIMI 7 LIVAdWAMLY ROOM 0 MAL EDU 0 lArEAIOIT 10 STOPA 6041D 11 1TA0LE0ITACK RDI:01 u VIM= M W.0. FACTORS PAM,—;.— OF U R M X19 Z.— t 9 F 9— Z.9Z7 aj-17 0 umocwm !t AUTOW11070JAII RIP 110Y0L1R 10 CNN ANIS OMwIR a Cum"AIUO/LNt W CON Or MAOIMM a DISA1u0 1lM1 is ONrIAV QEM >K orrl0l i o"WIDALoIIl a PEDBTRMN 27 SAINVINZ i 01NACK §M ! !T'ORAOEUDGuI 4 1RANWW 41 V0. TIM N VO4M a vomw L �D1t1T Bs s�ernrrmr • 1JN oum 1 now ! REAR Dam s bilbm E " 0 urrlR um 7 1A0rAw • 000RRICHO 1. &. CT~ 10 ILJ70R fl OARAOE a LOWIIE 14 TET 00011 is 1100E . 10 $W#A KAUoR W WALL 10 1V0MCAMA0CRE01i >N ENaRYl= w GOWN"" in 0008 u DRIVERIDE e 10M !1 rAtOENOER 11DE all 1u pow n Tam s7 wwwN all wNDw10 a umo M0 ! 1TiDLYrORCE 1 0117 4 HID N 01.1111.ofO 1 KOM 0 omvww 7 LOGO NIN 0 LOOKDUTAVIOKEN 10 LOCK l IMMYJr10K 11 N1opcm u OPIN rON11LNs0E01 is 01090 N DOW u PRIW u REMONlO N lIAAll1W 17 TUNWO 10 fe rrrnlee ee er1*v V 100LYrC= >r IOLT OLTTTIR i 1R10*79 i d11WiLadOREli M OvftTNO Noramoff a Gum GUM i ow 0M1 rIH1101X /11Aw/1uN�oRLL i 01.10E NAMMl1 071LJr 0E1011311 • vwgw NI � ese��nv er�1�11 • 1071M 1 A MM ALAW ! CAMtRA 1 COA WOM t 000 1 PDOCNARt 0 GUARD am= 7 OPERATION ID 0 0MIDELOMTE4111 0 DECURfTYIONIITCIm w 1LPff ALARM 11 irEONLUxwA*bnMlr 1! wNOOw son M 1 ALARM DNA/LW ! ALOOIOLONl10TA1M 0 AT=%" ON PRa10N 4 CA WUMTM 0 CATMAOWI 7 DER!"TW 0 Do"NOTEUEO 0 FOU&NI OTAUMO Id am= 11 ORAD AND RN 1t MWWN KNOMID a KN WIMorNDOENCm" 14 LO0K0 UM 0 IAW WOIOAftCEwoOi+ » MAs7IJI01111W 17 WTOHS I= 10 MLLTYLE KSPWTi a PHONE DWAM i Fs,JAw0A0lTAKlWJM s7 TOWER DNARED a RANNAIM i OELIDTNINUM 09 OM*MONPRINAM 16 TOOK DONR.&AUMM i TOOK DRuf V. AWWW i 700KMDNMY i TOOK orrloE soup ENQ 30 TOOKTVNC49MRW v LNDE1101RJJD=CFDNM sE IROWLTW b VANDAUMM OIMrrTTI sa V&DIXE DDA WDEWWRX NI i M NIEEDEDTO RVXWf Fla i VICTVSNAME UIED 27 VICTArs 7=3 Low i WORE 000TUdKNIR 0i1 as IIET*Dp1p! AS Cu70MER 1047 rwLcNlY OdNlRY/E1r011 N UMND ANNTANCE r NEED wAYEAWT1M01AlPOW 10 PMCGL Aw 01 REPAIR IN 111011 is Uus prom U 1MPG A00NTANDE 04 SINKOIOJIM M VTJ;M wAl 70 ■.NDPMM 71 WJNDA KWM 72 r0110EDTo001lERMM 73 NORGlD7ocom W FORD 7* FONDLE Dur 70 ICIICEDTDLN ON FLOOR 70 IRMED TO MA MRSAM OLir 77 Pop= OFF AOAD 71 FOROWT0p'WOWKW 70 POII==AMIl 00 Iwomom 0, NAURIDW 0t 100NI "ID as LOCKW N M MAN7000LMr i 04LKM M GRALLYODRWID 07 RAPED WITHOWECT M 100GA0'W M 11MIEA1�lD 00 7a l LI o N I ELXM ! OLLUT 1 KLLJTTCMNO 4 UDY M 0 wicTl o ortiovrmm lolAF 71oorp" 1 son 0 IMM 10 JlglultY 11 MOCKLAN OIN UWNEV 11 NIARCOT01 N o71MR rl1N7l 10 rM11T 17 RAF§ or +X 197002 1! UROM 0 VENWJ&w100 >r p a wtoWl DL1L M A� TAL RM w N'GL I ✓ 76155114[5A - SH -An -32A (12/72) � � 1 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES co SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DATE: December 2, 1992 OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE � 1 FP,OM: L McCOWN, CAPTAIN TO: T i L �BELANGER, CITY MANAGER WA NUT/SAN DIMAS STATIONS CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUBJECT: COMMENDABLE ACTIONS OF DIAMOND BAR RESIDENTS I would like to bring to your attention the commendable actions of four citizens in apprehending a strong-arm robbery suspect and recovering two thousand dollars in stolen money. I believe their actions are worthy of consideration for some official recognition by the City. On Sunday, November 22, 1992, at 10:55 A.M., a female employee of the Jack In The Box Restaurant, 20965 Colima Rd., Diamond Bar, was in the process of making a deposit into the merchant's drop at the Bank of America, 2845 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., when a male 20 years old accosted her. The suspect wrenched the deposit bag away from her, containing $2,038.00, and fled on foot. Patrice Halstead, 2444 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., was using an ATM at the bank and observed the incident. She entered her van and gave chase. Suzanne Bradshaw, 1957 White Star Dr., was in her car in the bank parking lot and heard the victim yell and saw the suspect running, she also gave chase. She stopped at the UNOCAL Service Station next to the bank and an employee there who also witnessed the incident, Hoshang Rastravan, 2875 S. Diamond bar Blvd., entered her car to assist in the pursuit. They witnessed the suspect throw the bag containing the money over the rear fence of 2982 Crooked Creek Dr. Ms. Bradshaw stopped the car and retrieved the money, while Mr. Rastravan began chasing the suspect on foot. Ms. Halstead still "dogging" the suspect in her van blocked the suspect's path causing him to retreat. Mr. Rastravan caught up with the suspect and summoned the aid of a fellow employee of the service station, Joe Ingram, 21647 E. Highbluff Dr., to aid in detaining the suspect. Commendable Actions of Diamond Bar Residents -2- December 2, 1992 It is commendable that in this age of "non-involvement" by so many that these four good citizens would come to the aid of another, at no little risk to themselves. Their actions truly deserve recognition by the community. Attached is a copy of the crime report. LCM:gr T m FILE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT' Q� RECORDS a STATISTICSSUREAU'S USE ONLY I CAMDI DINT RFDnMT _ I1- ZZ►7 �_ __ % __ ACTIVE Ud INDEX Y,.F ACTION PENDING( ) (INPO No ( ) INACTIVE ) Noof AIuIT Anat, LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE c.K & t- ox s--A� No o) SuDi-t CIM -11 onH URN (FTN No) q9 J1 _ / a q 1 („� Q /1 O G� �� CLASSIFICATION go RES PHONE (MEA CODE) BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY 21P 2-a C) (oT CvLIAIA Ap. �!A�-Io.Ja 6A t BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) AGErB /`�!V) CLASSIFICATION � � CODE OI� LAST NAE FIRST MIDDLE A P-164 SEK If Domestic Vloience: CHECK I FLOW • RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY _ 21P RES PHONE (MEACOBE �3r)s s. �c�� ST a aN �O AS Z T<Q CLOTWI 7ZIR14 Q ATS, �I � STRP BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY ZIP 2 a 9 S <4 L 11M A k 91729 BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) ioli-4,9-5-NN III CODE W Noa Weapon Usea ) YES ( ) NO GATE. iMAE. OAT OF OCCURRENCE LZ L /J ( ,/J RESIOENGEADORESS CITY ZIP 2 4 2 LA iAm,0A10 6AA 91 ?o!r PRINT NO 01YES/A1��1 LOC f) STA ) VEN VIA SECTY. TIE BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) KAIR EYES, HEIG.'r R/DEPUTY E�p/UTESTEO _ ( ( ) WHERE --Don {� L 2 K)N �F Jr, .Ej./� /.Q //r��]Nea/JI/i�� I `� • C O rJ �'7 I� )Y • J fIi I / f O !, -! d I TYPE OF LOCATj�I �. TRACT CDDE t OF LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE c.K & t- ox s--A� SEK RACE OOB C YG,K ce l RESIDENCE AOORESS CITY ZIP RES PHONE (MEA CODE) BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY 21P 2-a C) (oT CvLIAIA Ap. �!A�-Io.Ja 6A t BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) AGErB /`�!V) I� � � CODE OI� LAST NAE FIRST MIDDLE A P-164 SEK RACE D O.B .I CHECK I FLOW • RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY _ 21P RES PHONE (MEACOBE �3r)s s. �c�� ST a aN �O AS Z T<Q CLOTWI 7ZIR14 Q ATS, �I � STRP BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY ZIP 2 a 9 S <4 L 11M A k 91729 BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) ioli-4,9-5-NN III CODE W Noa Lw57 NAME _ flq � MIDDLE (rDAT M SEx F RACE w D0- �EE 3 PHONE RESIOENGEADORESS CITY ZIP 2 4 2 LA iAm,0A10 6AA 91 ?o!r RES PHONE (AREACOOE) RESIDIENMADDRESS CITY - ZIP BUSDESSADDRES9 CITY ZIP BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) Y.J. Nor OF LAST NAME FIRST ,T ,I MIDDLE DRIVER S LICENSE (STATE A NO) zA Ayw -iob�v RE RESOENTE ADDRESS CITY 6 zSi n� P L6' 6R �z/i IZ. L,9 Gttr�l RES PHONE (AREA CODE) - l 9 - % / 3 BUSINESSADORESS (;ITr ZIP 1/100 AV- "141 -.NST t BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) — It HEIGM5-O? WEIGHT L7.1 _3Q AGErB /`�!V) WHEREODRETAINED OI� CITE NO tL OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES' AKA NICKNAME B KING N CLOTWI 7ZIR14 Q ATS, �I � STRP MAINN USED eJ!s CH/WGEWEAPON all(m) to . CODE LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE DRIVER -S LICENSE A No No OF RESIDIENMADDRESS CITY - ZIP RES PHONE (AREA CODE) BUSD*SS ADDRESS Y CITY ZIP BUS PHONE (AREA CODE) SE[ I RACE KAIR EYES, HEIG.'r WEIGHT 08 AGE WHERE --Don GTE No OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES - ANA NICKNIME BOOK04G No4. CLOTHING WORM MAIN CHARGE WEAPON USED VEHICLE USED N/ CRIME YES t I NO YRMAKE BODY TYPE COLOR BY DEPUTY UNKNOWN( )STORED( )IMPOUNDED( 1 I v + 7 T ()�/D UP— LICENSE (STATE a No) V I.N /FRAME NO .. DEPUTY BADGE No REGISTERED DIMER STATIONW UNITI No 27A LN KT IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS _ ArE pYE�u •AV�SSI(•'/(GH�N ,MENT -\FVy fY_�.Tl C H P too YES ( ) GARAGE NAME iMIPHONE SUBMITTED NO( I S VICTIM DESKIOUS YES D( OF PROSECUTION INA ER YES( ) E A P Ne SPECIAL AEOt "ST DISTRIBUTION NO( 1 FNSUREOI OR LOSS NO ARRESTREVHEW YES SUS UB.ECT TIME SE TTB)CBY DATE - TIME SECTV IE APPROrEDBY SUBMITTED NO ( I IDC30OF-SH-R-49 (Rev. 1/861 PS 1/66 USE FOR PROPERTY/NARRATIVE AS NEEDED 'L A v DATE _ Q�URN L jac, q12--�9a 2 z?— o 4t'7 INPUT/CHECKED VES ( ) EVIDENCE (COOS -EV) HELD YES ( MARKED. TAGGED, SEALED a PLACED INSIDE SAFE ( ) LEDGER NCIC. CII, ETC . NO 9Y: NO ) IN STATION EVIDENCE LOCKER OUTSIDE ( ) REFRIG. ( ) PAGE Nu IF BURGLARY: FORGE USED YES ( ) POINT OF ENTRY -DOOR ( ) WINDOW I ) ROOF( ) OTHER No( ) D �% ^/ PROPERTY: (TOTAL VALUE) RECOVERED $ 2 ` O I , • STOLEN $ //� r 0 MI DAMAGED PROPERTYCODE: S—stolen R—recovered L—lost F—found E—embezzled 0—damaged (Use All Applicable Codes; For Example. 1f Property Is Both Stolen & Recovered, Code Is SIR) PROPS TYREUEASEDTO CODE ITEM N. DUAN. 1. DESCRIPTION INCLUDE KIND OF ARTICLE. TRADE NAME. IDENTIFYING NUMSERS.•PHYSICAL DESCRIPTOR MATERIAL. COLOR, CONDITION, AGE AND PRESENT MARKET VALUE SERIAL Nn VALUE r��14 1 1NK� VAJ I j 57ATP3 <<c aA CQ C-"( r C 0 / N $ZQ ErV .-7121P 3 PA 4n Alfam J7g<,K -A3 TNf- 6-uX # 3tqV EV 2-' l ' #A A44 *-/- A ,,"vV. i yq 192^ 3 rle, F')w6.s ; r 4 JA 4 . ' A o k8Fl I &V 3 PSS%JG /�lG.t� �d.vT A JiJ Cv� t�91�1•v �a . . vA),0tW Tb 7,8'7S" t. 01Amolvp /3 i2 &V19• GZO t�J� S S e -c?" AA -& t�AL Aauk tb wrT 4A q pgr-rAj.-j.,.vG St4sPe'tT M4%r i% c N PMA49a2 /3A 2 u4 o CA L) ' Vc ,e -T Imo. ' . w As 4L50 {MC-. VI cTt M 2 7-&t,0 M6' TWAT SCREENING FACTORS YES NO YES N 1. SUSPECT IN CUSTODY 7. GENERAL SUSPECT DESCRIPTION 2. SUSPECT NAMED/KNOWN 8. GENERAL VEHICLE DESCRIPTION 3. UNIQUE SUSPECT IDENTIFIERS 9. UNIQUE M.O. OR PATTERN 4. VEHICLE IN CUSTODY 10. SIGNIFICANT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 5. UNIQUE VEHICLE IDENTIFIERS 11. TRACEABLE STOLEN PROPERTY 6. WRITER/REVIEWER DISCRETION 12. MULTIPLE WITNESSES PART I STATISTICAL INFORMATION COOITI NAL 1) 1) NUMUROF RIMEPROPERTY WEAPONS CODE ( ) ARTICLES THROWN ( ) CAUSTK:CHEMK:ALS ( ) CLUB/BLUNT INSTRUMENT ( ) DRUGS/NOXIOUS GAS ( ) FIRE/EXPLOSIVES (A HANDS/FEET/FISTIETC. ( ) KNIFE/CUTTING INSTRUMENT ( ) POISON O REVOLVER/PISTOL ( ) RIFLE ( ) SHOTGUN It ) STRANGULATION ( ) VEHICLE ( ) UNKNOWN/OTHER PROPERTY STOLEN RECOVERED TYPE OF PR�Rry STOLEN RECOVERED JEWELRY S S CLOTHINGIFURS S t LIVESTOCK S S CONSUMABLE GOODS S S LOCAL STOLEN VEHICLES S = CURRENCY/NOTES S I1 Q 1 Q i / Y S /� V le MISCELLANEOUS . S 3 FIREARMS S i OFFICE EQUIPMENT $ . t _ HOUSEHOLD GOOr)S S 3 N/RADIO/STEREO 3 _ COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES—SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT COMPLAINT REPORT CANTINIIATIAN I ImN. f/0/c O JQ_ ,4m-7_ nv'7 CODE: S • suspect, SJ - subject, - P- patient S/ V- suspect/victim S/J - subject/victim CODE IN.. r CODE: CODE: V victim, W - witness V ' • r •..- c - - I PAGE OF COOL W No. 2OF LAST NA I fJ /CAD A� FIRST �� MIDDLE EEX RAC! AY CHECK (, `J u{� DAY � I RESIDENCE ADORE" /is"? wgrra- . 7wk IDA. CITY P 'D 1ANIoN�O 13AQ 1'1'74 S- SHONE �+ 0 (;Z _ REf. PHONE (AREA CODE) og- S'ca- 2-930 BUSINESS ADDRESS 7110 AL5'. Go L_ 1) c -pa V R. CITY PLA us -AVM ZIP 914 r7 0 BUS. PHONE ( ARCACOD[ ) m- 9 93 — y z-» X COD" - � No.3 OF LAST NAME ��� FIRST QA MIDDLE SC% RACE A �� CHECK _ NONE I C.�/ ADDRESS tJ ( c W CITY ZIP - 1 an-EL-0-'wRESIDENCE RLS. PHONE (AREA CODE) RUSINLff ADDRESS� � � ,.1� ZIP I'�r RQUi. PHONE (AREA CODE) COO[ (LAST NAME 1 1OR FIRST JD6 MIDDLE Sex RACE CHECK DAY OF - OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES �o"�� PMON[ • l� ■ELO W RESIDENCE ADDRESS BUSINESS N. 46 CITY PR. PIAM 0A10 zip /J4X T7657 RED. PHON6 (AREA CODE) 9Q9- 861-9388 ADDRESS CLOTHING WORN 6A cify 1--P_ff�� ZIP f3AQ 9�7b._ � ONE (AREA COOK) a gg8-P'7 7i CODE: S • suspect, SJ - subject, - P- patient S/ V- suspect/victim S/J - subject/victim CODE IN.. LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE DRIVER'{LICENSE ISTATE O NO.) OF RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY ZIP REf. PHONE 1 AREA CODE) BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY XIP BUS. PHONE (AREA CODE) SEX RACE I HAIR [YES HEIGHT WEIGHT I I I I D.O.B. AGE WHERE DETAINED 1OR - OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES AKA/NICKNAME L BOOKING NO. CLOTHING WORN MAIN CHARGE - WEAPON USED COD[ FIRST IN INAME MIDDLE DRIVER'S LICENSE (STATE S No.) o. OF I RESIDENCE ADDRESS CITY - .ZIP REf. PHONE (AREA CODE) DUBINESS ADDRESS - CITU XIP BUS- PHONE (AREA CODE) KX RACE HAIR EYLS NE16NT W[IONT D.O.D. I I I I AGE WHERL DETAINED I OR OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDITIES CITE NO. AKA/NICKNAME BOOKING No. CLOTHING WORN MAIN CHARGE WEAPON USED COO[ LAST NAME FIRST I MIDDLE DRIVER'S LICENSE (STATES No.) NO. OF RESIDENCE ADORES{ _ CITY ZIP RES. PHONE (AREA CODE BUSINESS ADDU[{{ CITY XIP BUS -PHONE (AREA CODE) SEX I RACE HAIR [YES NLINIT WE14NT D.dJ. I I I i AG[ WHERE I OBSERVABLE PHYSICAL ODDR16l C 76 No. AKA/NICKNAME No. CLOTHING WORN ... #RMAIM CHARGEUSED VEHICLE USED IN CRIME YES( ) not ) ►R. AKL I iGDY TYPEI COLOR LICENSE ( STATE S NO. I V.I.N./FRAME NO. UNKNOWN( ) STORED( ) IMPOUNDED( ) CMI 1{O TES( )I F'ARAGE NAME S PHONE IDENTIFYING CHARACTERI ICS {UBMITTKD NO( ) PACK q OR REPORT CONTINUATION NARRATIVE URN 1441 --MLA— y 11 J S PAP fZdAt6)4 9-m PLayey2`s 1Ha� CS/R-2 sW�w �'' T t 6 l< ins A iLSLY 04 ) c?tn R S is V•j-7'-� ;- W A S AZZ-PA R Jc5 To -i r A &As-r/d Df6s rr !3 6 F - Z -r ) rJ it/ MO.MFY c t4 /z ,v 0AM f? T ,721ff S V/ MvN D 8AP. 6LV7 S it SA10 6' s r<.T' lP C -o 'n -la- 'D, oslr vN vA t)„ Z kieuir vAAjol Mt A rN�; 7kltl , j LS eoe-,,4jc5Q74_Alj tL l 4AJ3 1� — -U Tb dry► ;'Qp R,8s P 7) -?Gr Sys cmc tAt4X Pr PAD 57 -Of -f-' P --f-VITNESS RALSMIDrd E o L Nr t, -JA 3 crs i�G i Arm n/e5C T/ r s s 47c -r- ;q' MQsJ ey vzj rult VJCT I m ,-vD A CJD A<-& 6 ,-,JAfLl44N6 i' H mfa-e-.-2 YaLTHA T" r" PAD 3'ry J' k & vAJ +Q TiatS ANG47?-FV Pot, 5.04 - Go; iNTo 409W, VA^3 `.NAs Toad e -c -T .7AID 54C WAS /.J y)IFY2 CAR. oW /34wQX ff� f)q ICA `N AV V[ cr, Z YZZt, A An SAS o4o" stj sP0.r- / S!� C AA 577 c 6,46 M 6010 Dc c i e.. E- 1/6- /-v-ro VIC L-07- dA 7Yf-1 ^J Q c A Z 13 AVl4. W iT t75 S AAVA AJ 19 AafWV,q.v!F 57' 10A). 149' 7Z)W W t i'. A R A D Std AW Tb 4rT' PfM j4M ZA A. C'' f., REPORT CONTINUATION _- NARRATIVE PAGE ' OF URN 9Z- 9//"' G YELP CA PTA 8-9- T)49- S cn 5 PcscT'. M RV 141,44 5Z-4,jd W r r A ` Al I. -JO MAW Lei Rim LAM 61�A ID 5 4 ACJ 7)4" 'P tL ov cT Sl a 4,^.> - -37'AXv A)Y47 F C- ,SSS tic Wlr 1lAL S p&JAS CLOSlorTO 'D4r S C T /-'u 14J A V rJ . 131ZA03HAYJ W ZV O - S L4 Ocr 7 A4 A- D� tr /vt o N �SiR. ,V ggim wwakcp C iz-DQ SNS" S P O 'Y'a rA i Ar 't`W. e- o A) 4a i o S d, 7 4�3 7A A VA A.) T S -5-r"v 14CA" OC -7,;.M W PAP Occ tA A CIL Hf- Co -r i•v-- tQ w r iA?v.A-)e07-0 71-J A 75 /v—c i K '� CAd MV 7?4 C C)OL) *e.097. 3 S SWMZ_19-0 JAMni -#Jr s ML Q U-3 t?.v �1 C'J '' I1 S 929 S TIZ A IIAA-) CPA=M2 AJVQ Z0 15 P,' EC: ,N �t ri- iOaCAL S •. r/- S -LAWS-Mr-0) 11 .S r c -r eLav -AJR2 Mir 11AQ n4r StASPCCr w r TeJ QTS i,l G A q/vi Tato Me' Hd' #o 4cv 76R29RM-ch-n_,l.q_ — -- PAGt (o OR 40 REPORT CONTINUATION — NARRATIVE URN 9 2-„ y 9- M-7. 0147 r -s -r WIV A #41 .4Je—R A .^J D Ta (Q MM ES" no k e p PC vjdt4t p �L T-ot p �� T Tc� 5 E�"` c -r W97 M'J /U f'`I 7-0 W( 1 IvC> JT A�J, TVP' Cr WAS Md-r0(5A-AAWW - Ga7�? W tGW-* 0033q, A 1 ir5 �'tTV cl- .SFYz.Q-^I G A R-A1l y -"2-11 . C 4D- #Scc kAl- Gtr #) J a RX r-' WAS VICTIM 76R28SM—Sh-R-313— PS 10-82 r ANALYSIS INFORMATION FORM URrV euPBeT.� amm 7' ,► j jM r4.1 A t o,%) rZ o s min I mm" 0 uEvem 1 Caum s Lao 0 SMOFR 4 scum • OODE - I • NAVR I e wo,DwnT t NLD 0 REcm•,o t • THICK e • THMOIe • wu 0LH90" 1 ACPIV OCKED • DARK • FRECKLED 4 LSIHT/FAe1 III MED•AI e PALE 7 RLDDV e SALLOW e TANNED 10 woor m 11 MrR•.O.ED 0 bloom 1 BROKEN IMP It SPAM 0 SUCK 4 CROCKED i DECAYED E OAPA PACE 7 GOLD CAP e JovaED • MISOOIp W SLYER CAP 11 BTANED tt oQtE 1 cLo rNNO Aa M t CAPIMAT s o�u • �EwB.mr 7 PAKT• • SM1RtSUX5E • OHM 10 8HOPrM 11 OTHER DART 0 UPOodx i t MMI B SAOKTDIt9O 0 FACEWAD 4 PRONE TORO B HAND e usli OT 7 f= • *cum • CITFER 1 CL.OTMSI01 L +111 LR�'ia .._. •-• ! TAtTQOSfSCAR$/VARKB/ODDtT'IEB l - ' . a CLEAN MNVEM a MIaANN L R = TATTOOB/BCARB/YARKB/ODDRIEi Y ` t AF ' RO+IdATURAI 4 4 OQATEE ! D"Um It SHOED i LOWER LIP 0 LYFe S BLAIN► 0 MOLATACFE 4 MLLan • am pMNtl S OARO 8 foam MA11EXAPWIlD s min I mm" 0 uEvem 1 Caum s Lao 0 SMOFR 4 scum • OODE - I • NAVR I e wo,DwnT t NLD 0 REcm•,o t • THICK e • THMOIe • wu 0LH90" 1 ACPIV OCKED • DARK • FRECKLED 4 LSIHT/FAe1 III MED•AI e PALE 7 RLDDV e SALLOW e TANNED 10 woor m 11 MrR•.O.ED 0 bloom 1 BROKEN IMP It SPAM 0 SUCK 4 CROCKED i DECAYED E OAPA PACE 7 GOLD CAP e JovaED • MISOOIp W SLYER CAP 11 BTANED tt COW-----/ OLNVOMI I AMPUTAIM to KAM M 0 CAN&CRUT01 0 CRIPFM 0 M.POwN 4 HEARM AID 1 L8T • SKIN DM== S NMI • SPASTIC MOVE 7TRANSYESTiTE ' WAL-29 (Rev. 3/89) - e UNOI IN 1 SASESALLSAT 0 SODLYFORCE 4 eo"m 0 CL1b91.LDOEDH • FWiDMM 7 MIN • CLITSTAS Wr MrW e ARE to •MOmm 11 B•rtJf 700m 1z "AULATED "IFE U TWOLN u TW KN FE of CODE I "FEATLIRN 0 UN01MM 1 ALTERED STOCK I AUTOMATIC 0 SLUE STEEL 4 SCLTACTM 0 C fK)MEQ Oft - • DEMMER 7 DCL E NRREL e OVERU DER • PLAN 10 REvoLVEw 11 SAWED-OFF it sm" SHUT 4• -_ - ORIF I "LKIE / CAUSER I LATH I INIFEFEATURE 10 Woollowl It SAVCNITSID •t iIJTCFIER et OApOER d MLwr M KITCHEN N POCKET M BWRCHKADE M LATH I Sam a CLEAN MNVEM a MIaANN FUtII 1 ACCBiR Y ` t AF ' RO+IdATURAI 4 4 OQATEE ! D"Um It SHOED i LOWER LIP 0 LYFe S BLAIN► 0 MOLATACFE 4 MLLan s eLffm 7 BIDE •LAKY • RAM • C EDW= 0 a RAVY • CMiLEI1B � 7 Blow 7 CLALY -��� • BLIIRIIED • PLATTCP e B+IEA•Y211 Ann meltonmm>e COW-----/ OLNVOMI I AMPUTAIM to KAM M 0 CAN&CRUT01 0 CRIPFM 0 M.POwN 4 HEARM AID 1 L8T • SKIN DM== S NMI • SPASTIC MOVE 7TRANSYESTiTE ' WAL-29 (Rev. 3/89) - e UNOI IN 1 SASESALLSAT 0 SODLYFORCE 4 eo"m 0 CL1b91.LDOEDH • FWiDMM 7 MIN • CLITSTAS Wr MrW e ARE to •MOmm 11 B•rtJf 700m 1z "AULATED "IFE U TWOLN u TW KN FE of CODE I "FEATLIRN 0 UN01MM 1 ALTERED STOCK I AUTOMATIC 0 SLUE STEEL 4 SCLTACTM 0 C fK)MEQ Oft - • DEMMER 7 DCL E NRREL e OVERU DER • PLAN 10 REvoLVEw 11 SAWED-OFF it sm" SHUT 4• -_ - ORIF I "LKIE / CAUSER I LATH I INIFEFEATURE 10 Woollowl It SAVCNITSID •t iIJTCFIER et OApOER d MLwr M KITCHEN N POCKET M BWRCHKADE M LATH „. 1 ASMORf s somal 4 OOI,STRUCTON ORE s f 0ow s Gi>.FOOLJm I MAN= s OPIN FlBD A LIOUWANiPCCnsli SPARK C Rag aRNL 0 HURAUSOMTMID E sO►CCiOLORL>Ll�0s F OH *PPFDCINTBI s iTREETMILLlY . N VACAW LC f 1 WATBULAKE 1tE."DEIRNL It APlRRMNf if a corroNMi m a DUP= 4 MOS a mm a WGUF FAMLY s VaU LOMT NON•RNIDd�RML t0 SAMLIFNANCi 11 sM /Z sU1NESS OPPICE is CARGO =9AHM 14 CAmRNOTLLROK it vamAn"ou EAT Is FAIT PDOD. 17 GAs XTATION HDT RAI=EL 1• NpUIIAAFGMI mSAM N LIOUOR m 1AANW a am MARE 24 PARKIW STM=ADf Ss PHAP MEWDEMAL N pax Iuu" V RB.OVA ftmo A s REITAUMW N RETALOOODS N RETAIL s@WIRE"IR 11 sac= Is VMCti4amm is VESSEU10a as VOEOVREOORDS N RESLISRI�AL 0 uNoom 1 ATM ! BoDWO M a OHM ROOM 4 GARAIFJPILG. AREA 11OTOHm s twow L1DOM 7 LNJOIFina" ROOM SMAL soot s OAFEISOK iO rtmossHID 11 STALS &ACK ROOM a VV ICLE N U. O. FACTORS OF — 0 umooM4 s AUIOMAT'NTM 4M s7 SCCYCLIR as &W RINDPAWIR m c” MATUPPLm l0 CON OP MAO"m !7 OLiTOMNI >4 DLSAKED PR DSKAYffM 96 GF710E W OvmNSmwm N PE DWTHM BY SAFEIIOX N sW1OKOM W SfORV1GEUl0IN11 40 TRANSwa $I VICTM N vee s 4t vwou N � DeIHr 8s EYT11rAEZR 0 uwaam 1 F110Nf t REAR s sDE S UPPERUN& .I1utt im, 7 @"Emma s woRSOREN- s ==PAW 10 lLOOR t1 GARASE it sum DOOR is LOLNM M FET DOOR is "wF - Is OUONS MAW DR 17 WALK is WND0W8cwlNI i ONTRYI = N OONVER'n" r DOOR N Dwma= ss 1IO00 54 PAUDGERME 36 *.NPWF N TRDK W WNDOW !/ WNDwSO N 0 Ui04DKMN i ATram"OALY ! ImLrPOMICE s OLR 4 NO N KAMM I KICKED 0 KNOB Iwo 7 LOOK= s LOOK CUTAIJ m S u=PLNCIfD 10 LOCK SUPMEWP= 11 Ho WRCE 12 OPIN POR ILwm is OPB4iJ oom 1< PRI® u RB+1m - u sMLALL'M!D _ 17 71NNELED 1S 2A 14Fn= OF MOM TO"U m ' -- - N UNOMN v mmfPom i NxT aym N ORIDK"um >D 0MMi1LLK7OKASEIM at OVITEiI wwr&&W N GLASSGUM Ss KEY s4 PRInooL U SAWSUMDRLL N RAIDS HAAIMER Er" DEVICE N v*NU N areumm 01OW I AUDSLEALARM O CAMIERA I CRIME NATION 4 000 s PB4000ARs t GUARD OWMCE 7 OPERATIONID s OUTSIDE LOHTNO a OEOURffy& WSTKKER fO $L@fT ALARM 11 SPEC"LOWAVOEADOMT a wwww am N 1 ALARM DSAJLED a M A' COMM ON 91OK I ATE/DRANK ON PRBAM 4 CASED LOCATION S CASH OBAANDED 0 OAT sUR10LAR 7 DEPECA7m I D9AAND NOTE LOUD I POUVNEDSTAUL'ED 4 momwom 11 GRAS Alm RUN U ONITION PUNCHED /0 MMLOCOFHOMCASH 1s MASKwOR*"OEifDm Is MArruRNATED 17 MV.TCMQ USED is MKvw E KmPwm is PHONE DSAII ID So PLLOWCASETAKDAM SI POWER DMAIM U RINSAOKED N SELEeTIVE N LOOP at SAKOKED ON PRBAM O3 TOOK CONCEAIAIM N TOOK DRt= S7 TOOK JIWKW a TOOK MCMI ' So TOOK OFFICE EOUIPME W 00 TOOK'NNcRwmRw 11 LI MTIFLUB =OFDRLtOt W UR INAT® 10 VANOAUZED/GRAPFM N VJKCLA DOONDE.D'EWN SS V MNEEDEDTOREMOVERIOP X VICTIPS NAME USED X? VICTMft TOOLf Low N WORE OO9TUME&SPO1M N PRETBfJmWSE 4s ous'TOAMER N DBNERYP/LSON . 47 Fm MONEY N L&MOCANSTANCE r NEED WATENMTMIMTFOW /0 P=XMAW al REPAIR IN N ON N SALES PEPM a sEERNS ASSSTANDE 54 sEEKs G JOs N VICTIM WAS 70 KNDFOLDEO 71 NMND'O1A0M 72 POROEDTOOOMMWM 7s PORCED7006RONE 74 PORM70 PON IE SW 76 IORCEDTOLEONROM 79 P=EDfO MLlnVW' ESLSP 77 POP= Off ROAD 76 POKIDIOG`WOOPOW 71 PDRC070M OM so NAtmCUFPED al NAJREOAff N KIDNAPPED. N LOOKED N 44 M&NTOOOLM II MOLffm M ORALLY DOPULKm 67 RAMWff"OSJECT M SODOMI» 80 7FIiEATE ED N TORnm N - I NIDD it ILun a IwZr CASNO 4 uLOnm 8= in or amw s PwGERPRMs 7 POOTPRKM S GOR 0 HAS /0 JEWLERY 11 V=R ANODUS W MONEY 12 NAR OON 14 OTHER Pmm is PANT is RCITOMP" 17 RAPE KR AM 1s 700LS I s URNS i to vE+� aMPt 70P ' !t YB9CLE P 17 WEAPONSrA)Pfff LL N �:i MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR D#4440tr DECEMBER 15, 1992 1. CLOSED SESSION: Litigation - Government Code 54956.9 Personnel - Government Code 54957.6 No reportable action taken. 2. CALL TO ORDER: M/Miller called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by M/Miller. INVOCATION: The invocation was presented by Reverend Raul Ries, Calvary Chapel Golden Springs. ROLL CALL: Mayor Miller, Mayor Pro Tem Papen, Councilmen Forbing and Werner. City Clerk Burgess reported that Congressman -elect Jay Kim had submitted a letter of resignation as Councilman. Also present were Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney; William P. Curley III, Assistant City Attorney; George Wentz, Interim City Engineer; James DeStefano, Community Services Director; Bob Rose, Director of Parks and Maintenance and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., suggested that the community begin to work together with the Council to make Diamond Bar a model City. Don Gravdahl, 23988 Minnequa Dr., expressed concern that Planning Commission meetings are being videotaped by the public without first receiving the consent of the audience. CA/Arczynski explained that there is no legal impediment to individual taping of public meetings. However, there would have to be permission granted if the tape were to be utilized in some commercial fashion. William Gross, 21637 High Bluff Rd., expressed concern regarding the appearance of a conflict of interest involving M/Miller and his relationship with Chris Lancaster, who was found by the FPPC to have violated the Political Reform Act. He also expressed concern regarding a statement made by MPT/Papen at the last meeting accusing him of a financial interest in the JCC project. MPT/Papen pointed out that every home along the ridgeline facing the JCC project has an easement allowing the developer to grade on the property. Stopping the JCC project does have a financial impact on the value of any home along that ridgeline. She noted that she had also questioned the funding sources of these political action committees and that there should be full disclosure from both sides. DECEMBER 15, 1993 4. 9M PAGE 2 Mr. Gross stated that, as Chairman of the Diamond Bar Citizens to Protect Country Living, they have complied with every single FPPC requirement. He pointed out that the FPPC is established to protect the citizens from conflict of interests, not to protect City Councilmembers. Marshall Wise, 2600 Broken Feather Lane, requested that the selection process to choose a replacement for Congressman Kim be rescinded and that the matter be brought to an election. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Werner inquired if staff would be removing the "No Parking" signs that were inadvertently placed in front of the First Mortgage Company Building. M/Miller reported that Diamond Bar High School requested assistance in installing back stops. AA/Aberra, in response to C/Werner, stated that Mr. Clem Zirolli, Manager of First Mortgage and Todd Chavers, Chairman of the Traffic & Transportation Commission will be meeting to discuss the matter of the "No Parking" signs installed in front of the building. CONSENT CALENDAR: Upon motion by C/Werner and seconded by C/Forbing, the Consent Calendar was unanimously approved by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Werner, MPT/Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1.1 Parks & Recreation Commission - December 17, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.2 CITY OFFICES CLOSED - December 24 & 25, 1992 - Will reopen on Monday, December 28, 1992. 5.1.3 Planning Commission - December 28, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.4 CITY OFFICES CLOSED - January 1, 1993 - Will reopen Monday, January 4, 1993. 5.1.5 City Council Meeting - January 5, 1993 - 6:00 p.m. - AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 1, 1992 - Approved as submitted. 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approved Warrant Register dated December 15, 1992 in the amount of $416,290.97. 5.4 Adopted the following Minute Order entitled: CLAIM FOR INDEMNIFICATION - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - Filed by County regarding Claim for Damages of Sherry Tyree. Rejected request and referred matter for further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Manager. DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 3 5.5 Adopted the following Minute Order entitled: NOTICE OF COMPLETION -1991-92 SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - AREA TWO - Accepted work performed by Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. and authorized the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion. 6.1 SELECTION OF COUNCIL APPOINTMENT TO FILL VACANCY - C/Forbing stated that he believed that the person appointed to the City Council should have a background in City government, an understanding of how a City operates and the concepts of the City Council. C/Werner indicated that he felt it should not be the Council's decision as to who should represent the people of Diamond Bar but that it should go through an election process. Mr. Kim could be asked who he would recommend to complete his term, or the candidates from the last election could be screened and one selected from that. MPT/Papen pointed out that if an election is held, the term of office would only be about 5 months. To spend $50,000 for that short period of time seemed excessive. She then reviewed the elements she used in developing a matrix to determine the most appropriate candidate. M/Miller stated that he too used a matrix and stated further that the appointee must be someone who is not only qualified, experienced and motivated but also perceived favorably by the community. C/Werner moved to go to an election process. Motion died for lack of second. MPT/Papen moved, seconded by C/Forbing to appoint Dexter MacBride to fill the unexpired term vacated by the resignation of Congressman -Elect Jay C. Kim. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, MPT/Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to newly - appointed Dexter MacBride. C/Werner thanked all the candidates for their partici- pation in the selection process and noted that a vacancy now exists on the Planning Commission. M/Miller announced that individuals interested in the vacancy on the Planning Commission should contact either MPT/Papen or City Hall. Staff was directed to place the matter on the agenda for the next City Council meeting. DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 4 6.2 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - M/Miller announced two new City Council subcommittees: Economic Development and Code Enforcement. He stated that the individuals serving on the committees were directed to meet with community leaders and that appointments of individuals in the community will be accomplished by the subcommittee members. RECESS: M/Miller recessed the meeting at 7:05 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Miller reconvened the meeting at 7:15 p.m. 6.3 CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLING GUARDRAILS ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF GRAND AVENUE AT ROLLING KNOLL ROAD - ICE/Wentz reported that Council directed staff at the November 17, 1992 meeting to investigate and evaluate costs to install guardrails with hedges along the north side of Grand Ave., in an area generally 500 ft. east of Cleghorn and continuing for approximately an additional 1700 ft. Staff evaluated the cost of new guardrails in addition to use of salvage guardrail material as part of the project. He recommended consideration of limiting construction to no more than 250 lineal ft. of guardrail with hedges; that residents increase their respective slope area landscaping along Grand Ave.; that bids be taken for the lineal feet of guardrail to be installed and that the matter be brought back for Council action at the meeting of January 19, 1993. MPT/Papen excused herself from discussing the item due to a potential conflict of interest. In response to C/Forbing's inquiry, ICE/Wentz confirmed that the guardrail would extend approximately 50 feet beyond the Rolling Knoll intersection from the existing wall. The residents were not renotified because it was anticipated that this item would come back for further consideration. They will be notified of any subsequent Council action. C/Werner inquired if slope planting is necessary in order for the guardrails to be effective. ICE/Wentz explained that the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommended, in addition to any action that the City might take for any related installation, that the residents also be encouraged to install additional planting. It was not intended to be a condition. In response to C/Werner, ICE/Wentz confirmed that it was staff's understanding that Council had indicated an interest in funding the cost of the installation. Staff will bring information regarding the funding source to the next meeting for installation costs, and include an alternate bid, one for 250 feet and one for 2200 feet. DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 5 C/Forbing pointed out that it would only be necessary to obtain an alternate bid to install guardrails past Country View. He suggested that residents wanting to plant trees behind the guardrail on their own property should be able to get them at whatever the cost is to the City. M/Miller pointed out that T&T's recommendation for trees was for sound purposes. He suggested that Lanterman be contacted to see if they would plant the shrubs provided by the City. C/Forbing recommended that staff go out to bid for construction of the two alternatives for the rail and bring back an estimate on landscaping as a separate item to be done after installation of guardrails. The remaining Councilmembers concurred w/MPT/Papen abstaining. CM/Belanger stated that staff will bring back a package with the two alternatives as well as a lineal foot alternative that would give the maximum flexibility in terms of the length of the guardrail. 6.4 MID -YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93- CM/Belanger reported that, as a result of funding changes at the State level, staff recommended changes to anticipated revenue and resources with a slight adjustment in appropriations. MPT/Papen stated that she was opposed to an increase in staff in the City Clerk Department; the workload in that office was reduced about a year and a half ago due to Council elections being consolidated with the County; the policy of hiring interns to mentor young adults interested in getting government experience should be continued; with the change of procedures in the solid waste matter, three additional staff members will be needed, as stated by the SRRE, to accomplish implementation of programs mandated under AB939; and suggested that the Council look at alternative programs for graffiti removal since the cost had escalated. C/Forbing stated that the increase in the Clerk's Department includes the cost for Minutes and suggested that Minutes be done "in-house", as opposed to contracting it out at a higher price. He suggest that instead of $50,000 for an Assistant City Manager, the City could hire an Administrative Assistant at approximately $25,000 per year. CM/Belanger, in response to MPT/Papen's comments, stated the following: the agenda would need to have a budget proposal, both Capital as well as Personnel, so that the Council can respond to the effect of the implementation DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 6 of the solid waste system being proposed; Community Services had been directed to provide a staff analysis of the graffiti removal program and to offer a series of alternatives, if appropriate; if the Council wishes to see additional intern positions created, staff will readjust the manpower chart, and reincorporate into the budget the resources necessary to fund those positions through the end of the fiscal year; it takes approx- imately 30 plus hours for the City Clerk's Department to prepare the Minutes and it has been determined that using a contract Minute person staff to be involved in other very important City Clerk activities; and the guidance of the City Council will be followed in regard to the suggestion for an Assistant City Manager position. C/Werner, in support of the concept of an Assistant City Manager, stated that the City Manager should not be over extended to assure that the quality of work does not diminish. M/Miller concurred. MPT/Papen concurred with the need for an Assistant City Manager position and continued to oppose the City Clerk's request for an increase in funds. The person doing the Minutes should be present at the meetings so that transcribing is an easier process. CM/Belanger stated that staff will bring back at the first meeting in January a budget setting forth costs for creation of a solid waste management system, a proposal for staff to the end of the fiscal year, and an indication of the amount of money projected into the next fiscal year. Approximately $60,000 in revenue and expenditures for AB939 compliance is budgeted in the solid waste department which takes into account setting up a management system. Staff will also bring back a report on graffiti removal including alternatives in regard to different methods of removal. M/Miller stated that Council also directed staff to come back with a recommendation for additional signalization throughout the community. CM/Belanger stated that the report for additional sig- nalization should be available in January. It appears that there may be enough monies to consider at least two signal installations over and above those that will take place as part of other projects. C/Werner moved, C/Forbing seconded to approve the Mid - Year Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 1992-93 as recommended by the Personnel Committee and staff. Following discussion, motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 7 AYES: COUNCILMEN - MacBride, Forbing, Werner, M/ Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - MPT/Papen ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 6.5 RESOLUTION NO. 90-45F: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES AND OTHER REGULATIONS - CM/Belanger reported on recommended changes to wages, hours and working conditions of City employees, set forth as Personnel Rules and Regulations in Resolution Nos. 90-45 and 90-45A through 90-45E as presented in the staff report. He responded to an inquiry by C/Forbing by stating that the Personnel Committee, upon review of staff's recom- mendation, recommended this proposal for favorable con- sideration. In response to C/Werner, he confirmed that there is currently one open staff position, that of City Engineer, which will probably not be filled this fiscal year. Currently, ICE/Wentz is both consulting Engineer and City Engineer. If the position were to be filled, it would be in conjunction with the ultimate appointment of a full time staff Engineer. C/Werner indicated that, as a member of the Personnel Committee, he preferred to continue contracting out the City Engineer position. M/Miller stated that, as the other member of the Personnel Committee, he would like to keep the City Engineer position open so that the City keeps the option in the future. C/Forbing concurred. MPT/Papen stated that the benefits package increased from $325/month in 1989 to over $450/month in 1992; if the changes are approved, 17 of the 24 employees would become management and the salary increase should reflect the economy of scales. MPT/Papen moved to modify Resolution No. 90-45F with the following changes: approve an increase in the benefits by 22% per month; keep the designated employees as is and freeze salaries. Motion died for lack of a second. C/Forbing stated that when the City first started hiring, staff was hired at salaries well below the average. Increases received in the past two years has not brought staff up to the average for similar positions and this is a merit increase for a job well done. DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 8 MPT/Papen pointed out that this is taxpayers' money and that, in the private sector, salaries are down 5-6%. The 4% increase is above the cost -of -living and in today's economy of scales, in inappropriate. M/Miller concurred with C/Forbing and stated that, when staff was hired, it was publicly stated that an effort would be made to try to bring them up closer to the average. CM/Belanger, responding to C/MacBride's inquiry, stated that the adoption of the salary Resolution, as proposed, would not bring the majority of the salaries up to the average of comparable cities in the vicinity. It had been determined that 2/3 of the cities surveyed recently moved their salaries forward. C/Werner moved, C/Forbing seconded to adopt Resolution No. 90-45F entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES AND OTHER REGULATIONS. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - MacBride, Forbing, Werner, M/ Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - MPT/Papen ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 6.6 PROPOSED SEWER PROJECT IN "THE COUNTRY" - ICE/Wentz reported that a town hall meeting was held on November 19, 1992 at the community center in "The Country" with residents impacted by the proposed sewer assessment district. Staff included in the report an outline of the discussion at that meeting as well as general information relating to key tasks, including a need for discussion about the design effort and a petition that would need to be completed for formation of this dis- trict. He recommended that the Council authorize staff to proceed with securing competitive bids for design of the proposed sewer system; establish January 19, 1993 as the time and place for consideration of a Resolution of Intention for proceeding with the proposed district; direct that a petition be circulated to the affected property owners pursuant to Section 2804.5 of the Streets and Highways Code; direct staff to determine any EIR requirements for inclusion in the report to be prepared for January 19, 1993; and authorize an amount not to exceed $45,000 for City Engineering support. C/Forbing moved, seconded by MPT/Papen, to approve the recommendations made by staff. In response to MPT/Papen's inquiry, ICE/Wentz stated DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 9 that the intent would be to circulate the petition to the present owners of the properties within the assess- ment area and bring it back to the City prior to the February 16, 1993 meeting. Further, processing the design immediately would expedite the process. Bids could be secured rapidly and made available at the January 19th meeting, giving Council the opportunity to establish the Resolution of Intention at the same time. The bid process could also be streamlined to allow three weeks for a response from responsible bidders. The time frame indicated in the staff report is a very aggressive schedule and the key tasks must be performed to legally form the district. Regarding the health and safety issues, he stated that with current conditions and in his opinion, he would recommend that the district be formed as part of a health and safety issue. C/Werner requested staff to ensure that the emphasis on health and safety issues in future documentation be more prominently displayed. He noted that since the cost effectiveness and the timeliness is controlled between the Assessment Engineer and the designs, it is cost effective to have the firm managing the district also handle the design of the district. He further stated that he is in support of going out to bid and that staff should negotiate with Mr. Wentz's firm to do the assessment district, the management and design, based on the premise that there is a major health and safety issue. MPT/Papen suggested that the bid package specify both the design plus assessment and the design only, leaving the Council with the option of awarding both or only one. C/Werner, noting that that matter was initiated by property owners, requested that staff in the future maintain and establish the way the whole process was initiated. He reiterated his suggestion that both the assessment management and the design for the proposed sewer system be put out for bid. M/Miller reminded Council of C/Forbing's motion to accept staff's recommendation and bring back a final recommendation at the January 19th meeting, after an open competitive design process has taken place. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - MacBride, Forbing, MPT/Papen, M/ Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 10 6.7 RESOLUTION NO. 90-95A: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING SYSTEM - CM/Belanger reported that Resolution No. 92-95A would amend the current permit system as it relates to collection and disposal of solid waste, creating a non-exclusive contract to be granted to any qualified solid waste contractor meeting the requirements and standards set forth by the City. It is staff's intention, upon adoption of the Resolution, to meet with all currently operating solid waste collection and disposal firms and to review the contract document and requirements being placed upon the firms. The contract document does not purport to set rates. The rates will continue to be set by the competing firms who are providing service under the permit system. Lance Jones, representing Western Waste Industries, stated that, when reviewing the proposed contract document with staff, he would hope that the process include some flexibility in the contract language regarding potential rate structures, as well as provisions of services and compliance with AB939 requirements. C/Forbing noted that the 1160 -day" requirement on page 10 should be changed to 1130 days" because it is doubtful that any insurance broker will allow 60 days prior to the termination dated. Council concurred. MPT/Papen announced that she received a letter from the FPPC dated December 10, 1992 stating that there is no conflict of interest regarding her son's work for Western Waste, or with her receiving campaign contributions. Neither constitute an economic interest pursuant to Section 87103 and the case had been closed without action being taken. M/Miller stated that "of" should be added between "provision this agreement" located on the bottom of page 10, section 9, under Terms. C/Werner requested that the contract document include language to provide that the company would carry out trash facilities for the disabled as is indicated on page 3 of the staff report. It was moved by C/Werner, seconded by C/Forbing to adopt Resolution No. 90-95A entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING A PERMIT SYSTEM FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - NOES: COUNCILMEN - ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - MacBride, Forbing, Papen, M/Miller None None Werner, M P T / DECEMBER 15, 1993 7. NEW BUSINESS: PAGE 11 7.1 SHERIFF'S CIVILIAN ADVISORY BOARD APPOINTMENTS - CM/Belanger reported that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department requested that the Council provide the appointment of two (2) at -large members to its Civilian Advisory Board. MPT/Papen recommended Mrs. Dale Mueller and C/Forbing recommended Karla Adams. Council concurred on submittal of both names to the Sheriff's Civilian Advisory Board. 7.2 RESOLUTION NO. 92-66: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS - CSD/Rose reported that AB325 required the State of California Department of Water Resources to prepare and adopt a Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance to go into effect January 1, 1993 for all cities who adopt their own local water efficient landscape Ordinance or Resolution, or issue findings that the model is impractical for implementation in the City due to staff -intensive requirements and the lack of City -controlled water -monitoring information systems. As an alternative to the State Model Ordinance, the East San Gabriel Valley Planning Committee prepared model regulations which address the needs of cities in this region. He recommended adoption of the Water Efficient Landscape Regulations set forth in Attachment A of the Resolution. CM/Belanger stated that the standards set forth in the Water Efficient Landscape Resolution would ultimately find their way into a Zoning Ordinance when created for the City. C/Forbing moved, seconded by MPT/Papen to adopt Resolution No. 92-66 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Werner, MacBride, MPT/ Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 7.3 ESTABLISHMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN TASK FORCE - CM/Belanger reported that creation of an Economic Development Strategic Plan would use the business demographic data generated by the Business Survey for foundational information for an Economic Development Strategic Plan. The formation of an ad hoc task force to study and recommend elements of an economic development DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 12 strategic plan is necessary. Such a task force would be comprised of Council, Commission, business and community members. He recommended that Council direct staff to prepare an organization plan for establishment of an Economic Development Strategic Plan Task Force and appoint a City Council Subcommittee for Economic Development. Gary Neely, 244 Canoe Cove, expressed support for the Economic Development Plan Task Force and inquired if it would be appropriate for the City to work out a system to encourage residents to become registered voters since funding from the State is tied to the number of registered voters. CM/Belanger explained that the actual population is established by the census and not by the number of registered voters. the C/Forbing suggested that City Manager consider inviting Randall Lewis from Lewis Homes and the professor from Cal Poly to discuss with staff ways to improve the economic climate in the City. Following discussion, it was agreed to direct staff to prepare an organization plan for establishment of an Economic Development Strategic Plan Task Force and appoint a City Council Subcommittee for Economic Development comprised of C/Forbing and C/MacBride. RECESS: M/Miller recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Miller reconvened the meeting at 9:45 p.m. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: 8.1 ORDINANCE NO. 07 (1992): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING A HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT (GRADING) ORDINANCE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - CM/Belanger reported that implementa- tion of the General Plan and expiration of the Interim Hillside Management Ordinance made it necessary to establish permanent standards for hillside development. The intent of Zoning Code Amendment 92-2 was to revise existing standards for hillside development. The Planning Commission concluded its public review of the Ordinance on October 26, 1992 and recommended adoption. He recommended that Council open the Public Hearing, take testimony, approve for first reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. 07 (1992), the Hillside Management Ordinance. CDD/DeStefano reported that in October 19901 the City adopted an Interim Hillside Management Ordinance to protect the hills from future development. The Ordinance DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 13 CORRECTED PAGE contained new grading and landscaping techniques not utilized in the City and not utilized by a number of other cities in So. Calif. It is a compilation of approximately a dozen other Ordinances throughout So. Calif. utilizing a technique called "landform grading." He introduced Mr. Horst Schorr, the City's consultant. Mr. Horst Schorr, 746 N. Lemon St., Anaheim, showed a series of slides while pointing out the difference between conventional grading and hillside grading using techniques that leave the slopes looking much more like they were created by mother nature. He explained that the conventional method changes the setting into a very rigid, man-made environment that is unsightly. There are two basic components created in transforming the hills through grading. one is the building pad --the flat area where the homes and the streets go. That generally will be ultimately obscured by the building that will occur on it. The component that will remain in sight and in view forever is the slope. The slope has a secondary effect other than that it is there for view, in that the design of it has a lot of impact on the street pattern, lot configurations, etc. If you have a straight slope, you can be sure you will have straight streets and row housing. Mother nature does not grade straight 2:1 slopes. Found six different configurations that consist of convex and concave shapes that consist of ridgelines and valleys parallel or perpendicular to the slope face. He further explained that if a land plan is developed along with a grading design utilizing a landform grading concept by placing the structures in the right place, the loss of land is minimized. Another concern regarding landform grading is that it could cause erosion problems but a straight 2:1 slope can actually cause more erosion. The concentration of drainage in the swales, on the other hand, does not create any erosion because of the size to which these are held to a minimum. Landscaping naturally grows in swale areas and landscaping should be applied similarly, which also assists in minimizing erosion. In conclusion, he stated that the City would be on the cutting edge of hillside management by adopting the Proposed ordinance. M/Miller re -opened the Public Hearing continued from December 1, 1992. There being no testimony offered, M/Miller closed the Public Hearing. Following discussion, it was moved by C/Werner to amend the proposed Ordinance with a slope density provision. Motion died for lack of a second. DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 14 The following changes to the Ordinance were approved through Council consensus: Exhibit A, Section le, add "where possible" following the word "preserve." Section if, change "natural terrain" to "undeveloped terrain." Section lg, change to read "To correlate intensities of development with the steepness of terrains in order to minimize the impact of grading, unnecessary removal of vegetation, land instability and fire hazards." Page 3, Item 6, change "significant ridgeline" to "prominent ridgeline." M/Miller expressed concern that there was no definition for "significant" and that the definition of "Prominent Ridge" on Page 5 was very vague. He recommended that staff prepare a study indicating prominent ridges within the community, identify them and indicate them on an environmental constraint map, then all owners, developers, etc. will be aware of the designation --there would be no argument. C/Werner agreed with requesting staff to map the ridges. Page 9 "Slope Categories" - change to read "The following are standards for hillside slopes in areas that will not be landform graded." Change "% Natural Slope" column to: 1. 10 to 24.9 2. 25 to 39.9 3. 40 to 49.9 4. 50 and over Page 17, Item D(2), change from 112:1" to '11:5:1." Page 19, Item 1, change "beneath" to "adjacent to." Page 30, Item 6, remove "residential local," from second sentence. Change grade percentage from "10" to 1112%." Page 39, Item 7, change to "Where required by the City, jute netting shall be used to help stabilize planting and minimize soil erosion." Page 39, Item 8, change "within canyons" to "within undeveloped canyons." Page 40, Guidelines, Item 2, change to "The vegetation should reduce the impact of the structures..." DECEMBER 15, 1993 PAGE 15 Page 41 - delete all language below Figure 30 continuing to Figure 31, Slope Landscaping. Page 45, Section E - Change to read "Provide a sufficient number of slope profiles as required by the City Engineer..." Strike the next sentence. Page 46, Section K1, change to read "A computerized or topographic model;" It was moved by MPT/Papen, seconded by C/MacBride to waive full reading and approve for first reading, by title only, Ordinance No. 7(1992) entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING A HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT (GRADING) ORDINANCE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Motion carried unanimously by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, MacBride, Forbing, MPT/ Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: All Members welcomed newly -appointed Councilman MacBride. MPT/Papen announced that at the City Selection Committee meeting held in early December, she was elected as alternate to the Metropolitan Transit Authority for the San Gabriel Valley to be ratified by all L.A. County cities in January, with an effective date of February 1, 1993. 10. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Miller adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, CMC/AAE City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL -01% REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR JANUARY 19, 1993 1. CLOSED SESSION: Litigation - Government Code 54956.9 Personnel - Government Code 54957.6 No reportable action taken. 2. CALL TO ORDER: M/Miller called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. in the AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by M/Miller. INVOCATION: The invocation was given by Reverend Steve Berger, Calvary Chapel of Diamond Bar. ROLL CALL: Mayor Miller, Mayor Pro Tem Papen and Councilmen MacBride, Forbing and Werner. Also present were Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney; George Wentz, Interim City Engineer; James DeStefano, Community Development Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Curtis Postel, 531 N. Deep Hill Rd., expressed concern regarding the proposed location of the City of Industry's Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in that D.B. residents will be subjected to 24-hours a day of noise pollution, odors and security lighting. CM/Belanger stated that public comments on the EIR may be made by writing to the City of Industry until March 1, 1993. Industry must respond to the comments as required by law. The City of D.B. will also be commenting on the EIR during January and February. MPT/Papen stated that she shares the residents' concerns regarding the location of the proposed MRF and particularly the projected traffic that will impact the unimproved freeway systems in the area. C/Werner suggested that the residents get involved in a letter writing campaign to the City of Industry. William Gross, 21637 High Bluff Rd., responding to comments made that the referendum has delayed the progress of the South Pointe Middle School, stated that it is not the intent of the people involved in the Referendum to hold up development of any school, but rather to assure that the Plan created is consistent with the views of the citizenry. The Referendum has not delayed the South Pointe Middle School because hearings on the project have not even begun. Furthermore, many citizens do not want to see the magnitude of development proposed for the South Pointe Master Plan. The City had the opportunity to rewrite the General Plan to be consistent with the desire of the citizens. JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 2 MPT/Papen stated that the referendum has put a limit on what the City is able to do, and it has held up projects, whether that was the intention or not. CA/Arczynski reiterated that the City did not file a motion for change of venue. The City did inform the Court that there was a substantial project being processed that is partially owned by the Presiding Judge of the Criminal Courts of LA County. The court determined that the kind of potential involvement should trigger their automatic deferral of the case to the State Judicial Council for reference to another County. He pointed out that the City spent three and a half years developing a General Plan, and that it is not possible to have rewritten the General Plan in the last few months. 4. COUNCIL CO)MNTS: C/MacBride stated that he is accepting applications to fill vacancies on the Planning, Parks & Recreation and Traffic & Transportation Commissions. MPT/Papen expressed sympathy to Planning Commissioner Lydia Plunk in the loss of her father, Mr. George Lent. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: CM/Belanger stated that the Minutes of December 15, 1992 would be amended to accurately reflect the Council's direction to staff to solicit proposals and bring back a recommendation for design consultants at the January 19, 1993 meeting. C/Werner moved, C/Forbing seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Werner, MacBride, MPT/Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1.1 Planning Commission - January 25, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. - AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.2 Parks & Recreation Commission - January 28, 1993 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.3 City Council Meeting - February 2, 1993 - 6:00 p.m. - AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 5.2.1 Regular Meeting of December 15, 1992 - Approved as amended. 5.2.2 Regular Meeting of January 5, 1993 - Approved as submitted. 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approved Warrant Register dated January 19, 1993 in the amount of $215,943.48. JANUARY 19, 1993 RN PAGE 3 5.4 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by Amado Saucedo, November 13, 1992. Rejected request and refer matter for further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Manager. 5.5 PROPOSITION A LOCAL RETURN FUND AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AUDITS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1992 AND 1991 - Received, accepted and filed Proposition A Local Return Fund and Transportation Development Act Fund Audit Reports for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1992 and 1991. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC. 6.1 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR JOINING WITH THE LOS ANGELES CITY COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN CONDEMNING THE TORTURE OF BOSNIAN WOMEN AND SUPPORTING THE GOALS OF THE WOMEN'S COALITION TO END THIS PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE - M/Miller presented the Proclamation to Marya Basrai. 6.2 REPORT FROM SHERIFF RE GRAFFITI PROGRAMS - Capt. Lee McCown introduced Deputy John Maxwell, assigned to Metrolink, who is an expert on graffiti and taggers. Deputy Maxwell reported that tagging in D.B. is in the beginning stages and that it is important for the entire community to work together to put a stop to it, because taggers basically have a gang mentality. The following laws have been effective in other areas: 1) prohibiting minors from possession of spray paint, markers and other paraphernalia used in tagging; 2) a Vehicle Code provision requiring that anyone between 13 to 21, convicted of spray painting, will have their driver's license suspended, or the privilege of obtaining their license delayed. At the request of the Council, Deputy Maxwell explained that the majority of graffiti in the City is from local taggers and not gangs; the idea behind tagging is to get as much fame as possible and to pick places that will -be seen by the most people; they will choose buses, walls along freeways and walls along well -traveled streets; the basic mentality is no different from someone who tags a bus than someone who tags a neighborhood wall; the age group for taggers is usually between 13 and 18 years old; by 18 years old, they either have quit tagging, or they have progressed on to gangs; it is easy for a tagger to make the transition into gangs because of the lifestyle a tagger leads, such as being out late at night, stealing paint and other items, and conflicts arising with other crews and that most agencies have been cooperative in dealing with the graffiti issue. JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 4 Capt. McCown stated that because the problem is not just within the City but within all the Walnut/San Dimas region, a systematic approach is being utilized. He reported that the Sheriff's office is setting up sting operations and that 11 arrests for tagging have been made since December 15, 1992. All arrested were local residents, 9 of whom are juveniles and were handled through the Probation Department. One tagger caught was an adult. Further, the problem is being approached through a series of meetings with the head District Attorneys for our Criminal Justice System and with the Probation Department so that there is uniformity in dealing with juvenile and adult taggers; remaining active in the "Project Safe Community" and meeting with School District representatives once a month; giving graffiti updates on the Bulletin Board financed by the City for our Gang Unit for each of the School Districts; and presenting a draft City Ordinance for Council's review to require people selling markers and spray cans to keep them locked and accessible only to employees, in addition to the previously approved reward system for the arrest and conviction of a tagger. This action will also be stressed in other cities within the region and with the Board of Supervisors to help eliminate a lot of the immediate access. C/MacBride emphasized that the City is dedicated to stopping taggers and is willing to take firm, quick and aggressive action. MPT/Papen suggested that the DMV provision regarding the loss or delay of driver's licenses be emphasized as a punishment, as well 'as consideration of a monetary remuneration to the City. Capt. McCown indicated that this type of punishment is being emphasized and is handled by Probation. His department is further considering having a tagger spend extra time at the Sheriff's office once he or she has been arrested for tagging and having the child and the parents do community service for the City by cleaning up walls on the weekend. C/MacBride expressed appreciation to Red Calkins and Thomas Yeager, who have indicated their support of the Council's actions. M/Miller also thanked Tom Ortiz for volunteering 8 hours a week to remove graffiti at no cost to the City. 7. OLD BUSINESS: 7.1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SUPPLEMENTAL GRAFFITI REMOVAL CONTRACTOR FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CM/Belanger JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 5 reported that the Council directed staff, at their January 5, 1993 meeting, to prepare an RFP to obtain a contractor to assist the Boys and Girls Club of San Gabriel Valley in graffiti removal. He recommended approval of the specifications and direction to staff to work with the City Council subcommittee to evaluate those areas where local organizations could be involved in the abatement process. C/Werner requested that the RFP specify that the 24-hour hotline be a local telephone number or an 800 number. M/Miller informed staff that a member of the community complained that he received no response after calling the Boys Club hotline number for three days. It was moved by C/Werner, seconded by C/MacBride to approve staff's recommendation on the bid package for removal of graffiti, as amended. Motion carried unanimously. 7.2 RESOLUTION NO 93-01: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS - ICE/Wentz reported that the Resolution of Intention begins the process of ordering the sewer construction project within The Country relating to health, safety and maintenance concerns due to inadequacies of the existing septic system. The Resolution directs the City Engineer to prepare a detailed Engineer's Report for Council consideration at a Public Hearing. He further reported that Jim Gardner, Manager of The Country Homeowners' Assn., indicated that Parcel #124 on the map should be excluded from the assessment district. The final design is anticipated to be completed in July. The Engineer's Report should be completed for the March 16 meeting. In addition, the Health Department requested a letter from the City, along with the Resolution of Intention, in order for them to move forward with their review and provide a recommendation to the proceedings. Mr. Wentz further indicated that it would be appropriate to go through a negative declaration process and that retention of bond counsel be considered. In response to a question by MPT/Papen, ICE/Wentz indicated that the City has not received additional letters of support but did receive other communications from several residents relating their desires in forming the district. CM/Belanger reported that staff has completed the process JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 6 of soliciting proposals from qualified engineering firms for the design of the proposed sewer system and recommended award to Dwight French & Assoc., a contract not to exceed $118,980. He further recommended that a budget of $35,000 be created for undertaking a variety of geotechnical activities related to the design of the System to be overseen by the City in conjunction with the consultant. CM/Belanger also reported that Mr. Gardner was part of the interview panel to select the consultant. Mr. Gardner expressed pleasure at having participated in the selection process. He stated that it was an objective process and, in his opinion, the firm selected would do a good job for the City and The Country Estates. MPT/Papen noted that the Board of Directors of The Country Estates endorsed the Council's proceeding with this project. On motion by C/Werner, seconded by C/Forbing, adopted Resolution No. 93-01 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS. Motion carried unanimously by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Forbing, MacBride, MPT/ Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 7.3 INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT FUND - PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BUDGET AMENDMENT - CM/Belanger recommended that the Council approve the proposed budget amendment to the Integrated Waste Management Fund for FY 1992-93 and authorize the City Manager to retain, at a cost not to exceed $12,500, the services of a qualified consulting firm with experience in solid waste management practices to administer solid waste permits for the remainder of FY 1992-93. He further recommended that the line item for Capital Outlay be amended from $40,775 to $25,000, extracting the costs for electronic data processing equipment and that the amount for personnel training also be deleted. He stated that the management of the solid waste system would be the responsibility of the Public Works Department. C/MacBride pointed out that the staff report indicates that, in order to raise funds needed to meet State mandated obligations regarding the Waste Management JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 7 System, a 100% raise on residential accounts and a 60% raise on commercial accounts had been proposed. The public should understand that the City has to meet the costs related to these State mandates and if AB939 requirements are not met, the City will be fined $10,000 per day. C/Werner pointed out that the fee structure indicated in the staff report does not reflect the cost amendments relating to the computer hardware as recommended by staff in the presentation. The consulting and capital costs needed to accomplish the City's Integrated Waste Management Program should first be determined with the fee structure determined after so that the costs are spread equally across the board. MPT/Papen pointed out that the Waste Management System Program may be drastically impacted by federal legisla- tion to have a national curbside recycling mandate and a pay per bag disposal fee. CM/Belanger, in response to C/Werner's concern, explained that the Capital Outlay costs, in terms of the establish- ment of a system, are intended for the purpose of con- tract monitoring. He recommended that the solid waste contractors who choose to do business in the City be the revenue source for program establishment, both software and hardware, and not the AB939 fee. Furthermore, any change in fees must be subject to Public Hearing. There are two different costs that contractors will be responsible for paying: 1) a one-time only assessment for establishment of the hardware and software system Lnd 2) the annual permit renewal fee of $1,000. He recommended that a Public Hearing be conducted February 2, 1993, if the Council chooses to proceed with that part of staff's recommendation. C/Werner, referring to staff's recommendation that the City Manager be authorized to retain a consulting firm at a cost not to exceed $12,500, pointed out that current policy already allows the City Manager to authorize such contracts up to $10,000. It seems contrary to the policy already established to grant such an authorization. CM/Belanger indicated that the amount should not exceed $10,000 and staff will proceed within the current con- tract policy established by Council. MPT/Papen stated that if the amount were to exceed $10,000 by $2,500, the matter need not come back to Council but could go before the Solid Waste subcommittee. M/Miller noted that the Solid Waste subcommittee consists of C/Forbing and C/Werner and the Sister Cities subcommittee consists of C/MacBride and C/Werner. JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 8 M/Miller opened the meeting to public testimony. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., suggested that the trash companies be responsible for tracking the amount of trash dumped and the amount of recycling material picked up, thus eliminating the need for a $40,000 computer and additional staff. The amount of recyclable material from vending machines should also be reported to the City to help reach the 25% goal mandated by AB939. He noted that the City of La Puente is requiring a $5,000 non-refund- able application fee to those companies interested in a bid for trash pickup in the City. CM/Belanger explained that there will be a non-refundable contract fee for each hauler to defray the cost of establishment of a system to track their activities. He pointed out that staff is not making a recommendation to increase staff, but to reduce it by 20%. AA/Butzlaff stated that because reverse vending machines and other private recyclers are regulated under State statute requiring them to submit reports to the State, the City is unable to ascertain their level of activity. Regulations of AB294 try to bridge this gap, but it will be some time before the impacts on the reporting require- ments can be measured. At this time, the City can only require private recyclers to provide such information through a CUP or developmental review process in the beginning stages of their application to do business in the City. AA/Butzlaff further stated that even though the information presented to the State is reported on a jurisdictional level, State statute provides that it remain confidential and is proprietary in nature. The City would not be able to use this information in any useful manner because it cannot be used to be reported to any Council or State agency. CM/Belanger noted that though the information related to the generation of that material may be confidential, it is unlikely that the tonnage would not be able to be utilized in the overall evaluation of this system. Therefore, vending machines can be utilized for divergence and calculation purposes within the City. Don Gravdahl, 23988 Minnequa, asked why staff is recom- mending the system when the consultant firm to be utilized should have the needed equipment. He also noted that the trash hauler's rates will reflect the $5,000 fee charged by the City. He suggested that local talent be utilized for any additional staff needed for this program. CM/Belanger explained that the purpose of retaining a consultant is to also evaluate what the needs of the City JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 9 will be including skills and education. The suggestion of utilizing local resources will be strongly considered. MPT/Papen recommended that: 1) Council set a Public Hearing for February 2, 1993 for increase of fees; 2) an analysis should be conducted to determine the cost per pound in comparison to a residential neighborhood, containerized, or a commercial bin, and reflect the actual disposal rates for those kinds of containers; 3) the proposed CAD system for the Solid Waste Department be eliminated since the City's Acting Public Works Director has enormous experience in solid waste; 4 ) the Public Works Department, not an outside consultant, should provide a proposal on how to implement the 54 programs, implement contracts, staffing, and computer requirements; and, if a computer is bought, we should establish a GSA price as the maximum to be paid. C/Werner noted that Mr. Belanger should be allowed the latitude to choose a consulting firm under the $10,000 limit process. It would not be appropriate to set the date of the Public Hearing until the issues have been clarified. M/Miller stated that Council concurs to direct staff to proceed under the $10,000 limit for the consultant, to refer the matter back to the Subcommittee to meet with staff and to come back with an affirmative recommenda- tion. In addition, that those trash haulers signing the contract with the City prior to February 1, 1993 be allowed a 28 -day grace period to allow them time to submit necessary bonding and insurance documentation. All trash haulers not signing a contract prior to February 1, 1993 will receive a termination notice. 7.4 ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC TASK FORCE - CM/Belanger reported that cities, counties and special districts in the State have been given the re- sponsibility for supporting many of the economic develop- ment activities that, by case law and statute over the period of the last 12 years, have become the responsibil- ity of the State. There is a need to develop a strategic plan and implement programs to assist property owners in their ability to attract and retain lessees in their centers, to encourage investment in the community and in the development of new business and provide employment opportunities as well as provide a reliable revenue source for the City. He recommended that Council establish an Economic Development strategic planning process to include the three elements outlined in the staff report and suggested that the Blue Ribbon Economic Development Task Force consist of 15 individuals from the community, either residents or business people, who have an investment in the community, that will continue on as JANUARY 19, 1993 M PAGE 10 advisors to the Council. However, the report will be completed by professional consultants. C/Forbing suggested that the scoping session of the Blue Ribbon Economic Development Task Force be scheduled at a time when the consultants can participate in the meeting, thereby also allowing additional time to solicit community interest. Furthermore, this process needs to be done in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce. C/Werner indicated that he felt the responsibility of the Subcommittee is to recommend to the Council the compo- sition and size of the Task Force, and how it should be assembled, and not necessarily be representatives of the Council on this issue. MPT/Papen stated that since any final action will require full Council approval, and that there will be reports from the consultants and feedback from the Task Force, she has no problem with the Subcommittee functioning as the official representatives on this issue. M/Miller, noting that this will be a developing process, stated that the Subcommittee will most likely come back to the Council with several recommendations as the strategy and proposals are developed, to receive direction from the Council. C/Werner questioned how the actual composition of the members of the Task Force will be determined. He inquired if each Councilmember will have the opportunity to recommend individuals on the Task Force. NEW BUSINESS: 8.1 APPOINTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONER - C/Forbing nominated Steve Johnson, Director of Central Programming at Lanterman Developmental Center. C/Werner seconded the nomination and with Council concurrence, Mr. Johnson was appointed to fill the unexpired term vacated by Lydia Plunk on the Parks & Recreation Commission. 8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT MATERIALS INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS - CM/Belanger recommended approval of the Environmental Enhancement Project Materials Installation Agreement with the California Conservation Corps in an amount not to exceed $150,144 and authorize the City Manager or his designee, to sign the agreement. MPT/Papen, noting that the City is coming in $125,000 under budget by utilizing the Conservation Corps, inquired if there is a possibility of getting authorization from the State to expand the scope of work, JANUARY 19, 1993 PAGE 11 utilizing this money. CM/Belanger indicated that staff will be asking the State if the City can expand the scope of the project from Grand Ave. toward the City and County line to the west. It was moved by C/Forbing and seconded by C/Miller to approve the Environmental Enhancement Project Materials Installation Agreement with the California Conservation Corps in an amount not to exceed $150,144 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to sign the agreement. Motion carried unanimously by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, MacBride, Werner, MPT/ Papen, M/Miller NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: MPT/Papen encouraged the public to watch the State budget hearings. M/Miller announced that, due to inclement weather, he did not hold a press conference with the media last week regarding the upcoming agenda but that the agenda was FAXed to the media and questions were answered over the telephone. 10. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned in memory of George Lent. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, CMC/AAE City Clerk I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Pro Tem Papenn and Councilmember Forbing FROM: Linda G. Magnuson', Accounting Manager SUBJECT: Voucher Register, February 2, 1993 DATE: January 28, 1993 Attached is the Voucher Register dated February 2, 1993. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to their entry on the Consent Calender. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers audited approved and recommended allowed from the following funds FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION dated February 2, 1993 has been for payment. Payments are hereby in these amounts: 001 General Fund $499,960.10 112 Prop A -Transit Fund 3,040.56 138 LLAD #38 Fund 3,475.20 139 LLAD #39 Fund 7,041.61 141 LLAD 441 Fund 93.60 225 Grand Av Const Fund 17,256.00 227 Traffic Mit Fee 456.00 250 CIP Fund 2,652.94 TOTAL ALL FUNDS APPROVED BY: Linda G. Magnu n Accounting Manager Terrence L. Belang City Manager $533,976.01 ,/Z/"- Phyklis E. Papen Mayor Pro Tem �hn A. Forbing ouncilmember +++ City of Diamond Aar tt+ RUN TIME: 11:88 81/26/93 V 0 U C H E k R E G I S T E R DUE THRO.............02/82/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PR3J.TX-N0 BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------.. ARA/Cary Refreshment Svcs ARA +881-4898-2325 1 302824 Aberra, Tseday Aherra +881-4518-2348 1 31282A Accurate Landscape Accurate *139-4539-2218 2 30202A *139-4539-2216 1 38282A *138-4538-2218 i 38282A *138-4538-5588 2 38282A 8111428 *139-4539-5588 2 382824 81/1421 American Storage LID Aoer:itorag +881-4898-2148 1 38282A Armentrayt, Phil Artentrnut +881-4448-4848 1 32282A Atlantic Ricnfield At.lantRich +881-3411 1 31262A Beke, John C. BekeJ +881-4553-4188 4 312#20 Burgess, Lynda BurgessLyn +881-4840-2325 1 382824 CCAN Innovation Group CCAN +881-4838-2325 1 38282A PW 1 * t PRCPAID + t AMOUNT DATE CHECK --------------------------- 81127 82182 297647 Meetinq Supplies 125.65 TOTAL 011E VENDOR --------> 125.65 81127 82/82 Tuition b Book Reimb 214.9+ TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------; 214.94 81127 82/82 27166 Oper Materials Dist 39 314.28 81127 82/82 21288 Restake Pinetree-Dist 39 682.81 81127 82182 27233 Oper Materials Dist 38 83.15 81127 12/82 27313 Jan Maint Dist 738 3,211.61 81127 82/62 27314 Jan Maint Dist =39 5,698.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 9,988.95 81127 82/82 Rent for 2 Units -Feb 153.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 153.81. 81127 82182 6117 EmerCoard5vcs-1/11-1122 1,158.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1,158.11 81127 82/82 Facilty6212 Overpyant Reimb-B1dgPermt 175.75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 175.75 81127 82182 T/T Mtq 1/14/93 48.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 48.81 81121 82182 Reimh ben Member Mtq 1/21 2S.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 25.81 81127 82/82 3/25/93 Wrkshop-CMgr 98.81 10TAL DILE VENDOR --------) 98.81 +++ City of 0 i a a o n d Bar +�++ RUN TIME: 11:88 01128/93 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 DUE THRU.............82/07/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * + PREPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.Tt-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ------------------------------------------------ ENTRY/DUE : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE DESCRIPTION _ AMOUNT DATE CHFCK CEVAER CEVAER +00]-4018-2325 3 28783E 01126 07182 Mtq Yaaan legisltrs-Papen 2S.00 02/82/93 0280017071 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----) 25.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 8.08 CLOUT CLOUT +001-4010-2330 1 30202A 01/27 07/02 Legis.Conf-Forbinq 215.00 }001-4030-2330 1 30202A 81/21 02/22 Legis.Conf-Belanger 215.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 550.00 CTL Envirosental Services CTL +250-4310-6415 04693 2 38702A 01/1461 81127 02/02 26411 Asbestos Srvey-Heritage 1,257.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1,251.00 Calif. Statewide Castatecol +801-4096-2399 1 20203E 01/28 02/02 Vouchers-AirfareProgram 515.00 82/02/93 0004017076 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 515.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 6.88 California Political geek CalPeek +801-4030-2320 1 30212A 81/27 02/07 Subscription Renewal 165.08 IOfAL DUE VENDOR --------> 165.00 Chavers, J. Todd ChaversJT +081-4553-4100 1 302820 01/27 02102 T/T Mtq 1/14/93 40.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 48.00 Cheng, Diana ChengD +281-4553-4100 2 302020 81/27 02/02 1/1 Mtq 1/14/93 46.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 48.00 Choice Christoas Trees ChoiceTree +001-4690-1200 3 20283E 81/28 02102 Supplies 69.75 07/02/93 WW W 9 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 69.75 OTAL DUE. VFNDOR--------> 6.00 Coaaunity Industries CommIndust +001-4510-5540 1 34222A 01/27 07102 Dec Litter Abatesent Svcs 586.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 506.00 + � City of D i a a o n d Bar # RUN TINE: 11:06 01/28/93 V 0 U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R D01 THRO.............02/02173 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PR03.TI-NO BATCH PD.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DLIE INVOICE 116CRIPI!ON --------------------------------------------- :1 ------------------------------------------- Community -------------------=------------------------------------------- Community Sweeping ComSweep }001-4555-5501 1 38?0?A Dept of Transportation DeptTrans +001-4555-5587 1 36202A Dimond Bar Business Asoc DBBusAssoc 001-4090-221.0 1 30242A Diamond Bar Kiwanis Club DBaiKiwani {001-4350-5300 1 38202A Direct List Technologies DirlistTec *001-4350-5300 2 34262A Dwight French 1 Assoc. Dwightfren *2?.1-451.0-6412 06192 1 30262A 01/1332 *225-4510-6411 06393 2 39292A 01/1457 *250-4510-6411 05992 2 34212A 01/1296 E. San Gab. Planning Coma E:iGVPC *001-4030-2325 2 20203E 01121 02102 01127 02102 •124327 01/21 02/02 01121 02/02 PA6C . * * PREPAID * * AMOUNT DATE CHE'U -------------------------- Sweeping Svcs 11/22-12/26 10,902.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 10,902.0E Nov -Signal I Lightny Svcs TOTAL DILE VENDOR --------} Feb Common Area Maint IOfAL DUE VENDOR -------- 1993 Baseball Clinic IOfAL DUE VENDOR ------- 01127 02102 0034040 Recreation Supplies TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------- 451.06 4SI.06 53S.00 535.00 300.06 ^:10.00 255.00 155.00 01127 02102 100897 Prof 5+cs-Gidn Sprqs 456.00 01/27 02162 100955 Grand Ave Imprvmnts 17,256.00 01127 02102 123456 Prof Svcs-G1dSpr/Sy1Gln 350.00 009SS4170 Supplies -Pub Wks TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 18,062.00 01128 02102 Gen Mtq 1128-Butzlaff 20.00 02/02/93 0od0311u71 009870838 Supplies -Pub Wks TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----} 20.00 1 382028 65/1397 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------) 6.00 Eastman Inc. Eastflan fool -4510-1100 3 302028 7311391 01127 02162 009SS4170 Supplies -Pub Wks 49.80 *001-4510-1100 2 302028 12/1397 01127 02/02 009870838 Supplies -Pub Wks 123.41 t061-4010-1100 1 382028 65/1397 01127 02/02 009915323 Supplies-CCouncil 47.40 *001-4030-1100 1 30202B 64/1397 01/27 02/02 00/915331 Supplies-0gr 7.14 *001-4040-1100 1 302029 6311397 01127 02/02 009915345 Supplies-CClk 3.13 *001-4350-1200 2 30202B 62/1397 01/27 02102 009915351 Supplies -Finance 10.44 till -4090-1100 3 302028 70/1397 01/27 02/02 609915360 Supplies -Gen Gavt 94.11 1161-4210-1100 1 302028 68/1391 01/21 02/02 109915363 Supplies-Planninq 119.54 *001-4350-1200 1 382828 61/1397 01121 02/02 609915417 Supplies -Recreation 57.56 1001-4210-1106 2 302022 6911397 87/27 02/02 009915423 Supplies-Planninq 256.60 1061-4091-116/ 2 302028 67/1397 01127 02112 0/9932594 Supplies -Gen Gavt 98.16 1/11-4090-1110 1 322028 60/1397 11/27 02102 009953911 Supplies -Sen Govt 110.24 1-1-* City of D i a a o n d Bar *t1- RUN TIME: 11:06 81126/93 V 0 U C H E A R E 6 I S T E R DUI: THRU.............02/02/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR 1D. ACCOUNT PR33.TI-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION - ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------------------- Eastean Inc. Eastean *881-4518-1108 1 3020'2B 6611397 1-801-4898-1108 4 382828 7111397 Excel Paving Co. ExcelPave }258••4518-6412 05993 2 302028 81/1494 Foothill Building FtBldgAatr 1-881-4448-1288 6 382828 61/1491 t881-4440-1288 2 31262B 8111492 +081-4448-1288 4 382826 01/1492 *001-4448-1288 6 382828 01/1495 GTE California GTE 1-001-4048-2125 1 30282H GTE California bTE *801-4440-2125 1 382028 GTE California GTE }001-4848-212.5 2 382828 GTE California GTE 1-081-4090-2125 2 30282B GTE California 6TE *081-4331-2125 1 382820 GTEL 6TEL *001-4090-2125 1 302028 P Ahr 4 * 1- PREPAID * 4 AMOUNT DATE ChECK -------------------------- (CONTINUED) 01/27 02/02 0299539/3 Supplias-Pub Wks 141.5 01/21 62182 089957658 Supplies-6en Gavt 27.28 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 1,146.66 01/21 02/82 ar7/84 DrainSys-61dnSp/Sy61 669.46 To(AL DUE VENDOR --------) 669.40 01121 62102 1625 Eaer Prep -Sand 163.69 81/27 02102 1639 Emer Prep -Sand 163.69 81/27 02102 1640 Eaer Prep -Sand 163.89 01/21 82/02 1646 Eser Prep Sand 163.69 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 655.56 01127 82182 Modu■ Svcs 16.33 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 16.33 01121 02/02 Eaer Prep Phone Svcs 38.99 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 36.99 81/27 02182 Modus Svcs 28.87 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 20.87 01/27 82182 Dec 62neral Phone Svcs 1,544.00 IUTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1,544.08 01127 02182 Ptiane Svcs-Sycasare Cyn 156.26 TofAL DUE VENDOR --------> 15A.26 01/27 02102 Feb Eauipaent Rental 976.51 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 97637 +++ City of Diamond Bar *++ RUN TIME: 11:68 61/28/93 V 0 U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R DUE THRU.............02/62193 PAbE 5 VENDOR NAME Hinderlitr VENDOR ID. 82162 dc14747 Pub + * PRCPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO -----------------------------------------------= 01127 BATCH PO.IINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U SCRIP[ION AMOUNT DAZE CHECK Gonsalves 6 Sin, Joe A. Gonsalves IW AL DUE VENDOR -------} 966.60 ICMA IC14A1 +661-4@16-4666 1 38282B 61/21 62192 Feb Prof Svcs 2,166.66 02162 Publication -Strategic Pln 25.45 36.09 +001-4218-2115 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 2,186.66 Hardy M. Strozier Inc. HardyStrot Hrq-ADR 92 19 31.00 +681-2368-1616 1 382020 61/27 62182 SaPainteMstrPln-FPL93-06 1,858.74 1601-7.300-1610 2 30202B 61/27 62162 SoPointeMstrPln4PL92-19 27,934.52 +661-7380-1610 3 382828 61/27 62/02 SoPointeMstrPln-FP1,.92-36 3,547.24 1681-4218 5212 1 30202B 61121 62/82 Prof Svcs-SePointeMstrPln 11,688.66 TUTAL DUE VENDOR -------} 44,340.56 Highlander Publications Highlander +861-40+6-2115 1 382028 01121 62/62 7443 Vacancy- Pip Commission 13.34 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 13.34 Hinderliter Be Llamas Hinderlitr 01127 82162 dc14747 Pub +001-4090-4010 1 382820 01127 62182 1612 Contract Svcs 4th Qtrl992 968.60 dc14826 RFP CDSG Ad 52.25 IW AL DUE VENDOR -------} 966.60 ICMA IC14A1 dc14916 Bids-S.verSysforCountry 21.38 1001-4210-2115 +601-4638-2320 4 30202C 61127 02162 Publication -Strategic Pln 25.45 36.09 +001-4218-2115 4 38202C 01127 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 25.45 ICMA Retirement Trust -451 ICMA Hrq-ADR 92 19 31.00 +661-2118-1067 1 38282C 61127 62182 Payroll Contrib-PP27/1 366.60 1601-4838-0086 1 30202C 01127 02/82 Contract Pymnt-CMgr 466.69 +081-40384090 1 30212C 61127 62/62 Feb Cafe Contrib-CMgr 667.56 1681-4046-6096 1 36262C 01127 62/02 Feb Cafe Contrib-CCIk 494.76 +061-4658-6896 1 38262C 81/21 62162 Feb Cafe Contrib-Fin 176.92 1001-4216-6696 1 30202C 61/27 62/82 Feb Cafe Contrib-Ping 544.43 +861-4316-8096 1 34212C 61/21 02/62 Feb Cafe Contrib-PrkdRec 297.72 1081-4518-0090 1 31202C 01127 82/82 Feb Cafe Contrib-Engr 985.32 TUTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 3,928.75 Impressive Screenrorks Impressive *601-4358-1260 3 382820.61/1416 01/27 02162 Recreation Supplies 622.67 TUTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 822.67 Inland Valley Dly Bulletn IVDB +601-4218-2115 2 38282C 01127 82162 dc14747 Pub Hra-CUP 92-11 59.38 +001-4210-2115 1 30202C 61127 02102 dc14826 RFP CDSG Ad 52.25 +681-4553-2115 1 38282C 01127 62102 dc14916 Bids-S.verSysforCountry 21.38 1001-4210-2115 3 30202C 61127 02/02 dc15960 Pub Hrg-ADR 92-20 36.09 +001-4218-2115 4 38202C 01127 02102 dcI5986 Pub Hrq-ADR 92 19 31.00 *** City of Dia a and Bar *{* RLIN TIME: ll:08 81/28/93 V O U C H E R R E 6 I 5 T E R PAGE 6 DUE THNU .............02/02/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * + PREPAID ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO --------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------= BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVUILE DE5CRIPTIC4 _ AMOUNT DATE CHECK Inland Valley Dly Bulletn Inland IVDB (CCN1INUED) *881-40+0-2115 2 3002C 01127 02102 dc16439 Vacancy PIR Comiission 21.38 101AL DUE VENDOR --------! 230.39 Int'1 Business Equipment InBustquip *801-4096-2200 1 3028210 06/1451 01/21 82182 001359 Jan Xerox Copier Maint 510.36 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------! 510.35 Jaraid Contractors Inc. Jaraid *001-3635 1 3828210 61/27 02162 RefundforPrintinQMaterial 180.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 100.08 Jennings Engstrand JenningsEn *801-4020-4021 1 302828 01/27 82102 Spec Legal Svcs-PropTaxes 147.33 101AL DUE VENDOR --------} 147.33 John Alden 6.T. JohnAlden *001-40101890 1 3020210 01121 02/02 Feb Cafeteria -Miller 475.54 10TAL DUE VENDOR --------3 4/5.54 Kobata I Associates Inc KooatslAss *001-4556-5500 1 28283E 81/1444 81/26 82/02 Prof Svcs-EnviroEphancent 15,935.80 1881-4556-5500 2 20283E 6211444 01/28 02/62 ProfSvrs-EnviroEnhancsnt 5,8b1.3S TOTAL DOE VENDOR --------! 21,811.35 L.A. County -Sheriff's Dap LACSheriff *001-4411-5481 1 382O2C 01/21 82/07 11629 Dec Contrac Svcs 271,822.06 IOfAL DUE VENDOR --------! 271,622.86 L.A.County Public Yorks LAGPubWk *112 4553-5529 1 3O2O2C 01/21 02102 59300801995 July -Sap Paratrans5vcs 3,040.56 lU1AL O11E VENDOR --------! 3,048.56 I..A.CDunty-Dist. Attorney LALDistAtt *801-4025-4021 2 30252 81121 82102 NDV LPga1 SVCS 10.53 100L DUE VENDUR--------} 10.53 +++ City of Diamond Bar +++ RUN TIbF_: 11:08 01/26193 V 0 U C H E R R E 5 15 T E A DUE THRO.............02/02193 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOONT PR03.Tk-NO BATCH PD.IINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE Dt6CRIPIION ------------------------------------------------ :1 of Ca. Cities League #081-4818-2325 2 28283E League of Ca. Cities Laague +001-4818=2325 4 20203E Leighton and Associates Leighton #001-4551-5223 2 382870 #881-4551-5223 1 30202C #801-2328-1812 1 382021C Lewis Engraving Inc. LewieFngra +001-4218-1248 1 30212 Loral Government LocGuvCom +801-4638-2338 2 34282 Gas Angeles County LALIntSvc +801-4090-2138 1 382020' Medina, Raul MedinaR +401-43110-4108 4 31212C Mobil Mobil +081-4316-2310 8 302120 1001-4898-2310 2 30202C +801-4310-2318 4 36202C #k81-4038-2318 1 30202C #881-4310-2310 6 38282C 1281-4312-2310 5 30202C +881-4310-2310 3 30282C 1881-4318-2310 9 36281C +881-4218-2310 1 302820 +081-4310-2310 1 30202C #801-4098-2318 1 38202 #881-4310-2.310 2 38242C PCbF 7 + + 'PREPAID + + AMOUNT DATE CHFCK --------------------------- 01/28 82182 Gen Mtq 214 -Miller 28.06 IOIAL DUE VENDOR --------} 23.01 01128 82182 Gen Mtg 2/4-Papen 28.08 02/02/93 0808017082 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----) 28.80 !OTAL DUE VENDOR --------; 6.06 61127 02182 27679 Prof Svcs-GaaTech Review 380.48 01127 02/02 16155 Prof Svcs Beoiech Review 1,309.38 01127 02102 71184 GeaRev-EN93-089 3,689.06 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 5,378.18 01127 02/02 012361 Engraving Svcs -Plague 62.79 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 62.79 01121 82182 Conf Feb 25-28-CMgr 245.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 245.08 01127 02102 Nov Paqer Svcs 68.16 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 08.16 61127 02102 Mtgs 11/19,12/17,1/1 120.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 120.09 01127 82102 kl588853 Fael-PSM 31.08 01127 82/02 k2989593 Fuel ben Govt 13.00 81127 02102 0990503 Fael.-PSM 2.06 01127 02102 k'19905/3 Fuel-CMgr 19.22 81127 82182 k2998643 Fuel-P4M 38.03 41/27 02/02 k2990676 Fue1-PSM 22.65 01.127 82162 0875970 Fuel-PS4 35.00 01/27 82102 0676095 Fuel -PSM 14.09 01127 82102 0876+71 Fuel-Plnq 28.56 81127 82182 k3676610 Fuel-P8M 35.0 01/27 62102 0877005 Fuel -Gen Govt 19.41 81127 '82182 k4573668 Fl:el-PSM 38.89 +t City of Dia■and Bar +++ RUN LIME: 11:08 61/28/93 V 0 U C H E A R E G I S T E R PANE 6 DUE 18RO .............02/02/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + ACCOUNT PR0J.TX-N0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK Mobil Mobil (CONTINUED) 1001-4310-2310 7 307620 01121 621x2 k4S13411 Fual-P1M 34.03 TUTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 313.94 Mobil Mobil *001-4310-2200 2 302020 6111497 01/27 62102 Brake Maint-Prk 1 Rec 91.63 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 97.63 Mt. Baldy United Way UnitedWay *001-2110-1029 1 302020 01/27 02102 Final 1992 Cantrib Amount 129.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 119.61 National Notary Assoc. NNA *601-4640-2315 1 30212C 01127 02102 NNA Membership -Nine 45.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 45.61 National Notary Assoc. NNA t081 -4036-23t5 1 36202C 01/27 02102 NNA Meabership-Whitehouse 63.00 10TAL DUE VENDOR --------> 63.00 Pacesetter Municipal Svcs Pacesetter 1001-4096-2140 2 307820 01127 02102 Feb Rent of 1/2 Ste 190 3,557.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 3,1:51.60 Pacesetter Municipal SVCS Pacesetter *001-4226-5281 1 382820 11121 02162 2821 -PC Plan Chk Svcs -12/21-1/15 4,185.34 *011-4270-5201 2 36262C 01/27 02/62 3069-b1 Bldg Svcs 12121-1/15 3,47.1.41 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 6,256.15 Papan, Phyllis Paper.P *001-4010-2330 2 31212C 01127 12112 Legis Coni Reimbursements 26.00 *001-4016-2330 3 30212C 01/27 02102 CalifElectWraedeimb 26.b3 TUTAL DUF VENDOR --------> 52.63 Payroll Transfer PayroliTr *681-1020 1 287031 01/28 02/02 Payroll Transfer PF1 36,880.00 61115/93 02x0 mrtl.1 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 36,800.10 TUTAL DLIE VENDOR --------> 6.11 t++ City a Dia a and Bar +++ RUN TIME: 11:86 81/25/93 V 0 U C H E I R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 DUE THRU.............42/82/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR IU. + + PREPAIl1 + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ----------------------------------------------- ENTRY/DUE INVOICE AESCRIPTIGN _ Y_------------__-----------_---------_-------_-.-__-------_-_--•---_----_--------_--_ AMOUNT DATE : CK Pitney Bores PitneyBore WI -4898-2128 1 30202- 81/27 82182 BulkRate-SrSarvey 61.93 IOTAI DUE VENDOR --------> 61.93 Plunk, Lydia F. Plunkl +881-4358-4188 2 31202C 81121 82182 Mtgs 11/19,12/17,1/7 128.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i 128.88 Postage By Phone PostByPhon +881-4998-2128 2 31212C 81/27 82/82 Postage Replenishment 508.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> Potts, lois F. Pottsl +981-4553-4999 1 30292- 81/27 92182 Appraisal Svcs 198.99 TOW DUE VENDOR --------> 188.00 Public Eepl Retirement PERS +991-2119-1898 1 28283E 81/28 82182 Ratire Cant -Employer PP27 2,361.65 62/62/93 0802017866 1061-2110-1898 2 28283E 8112.8 02/82 Retire Cant -Employee PP27 2,496.04 82/82/93 28801/866 TOTAL PREPAID WONT ----> 4,677.89 101AL DUE VENDOR --------> 8.80 Public Empl Retirement PERS +e31-2119-1046 3 20203E 01128 82182 Retire Cant PPI-Emplayer 2,214.22 02/82/93 082821/081 tool -2110-1066 4 20283E 61128 02/82 Retire Cant PP1-Euployee ?,419.69 02/02193 22201/081 TOTAL PREPAID AMDUNT ----> 4,694.11 I01"AL DUE VENDOR --------> 8.80 R.F. Comm. Specialties RFCcesSpec +001-4411-2200 1 392920 81127 a?/8? 18344 Radar Unit Saint 11.53 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 71.53 Regents of the University RegentUCLA +001-4510-23*0 2 20203E 01/28 82102 Saminar Fab 4,5-Lui 315.08 02/02/93 022?2114.78 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 315.88 TOTAL Dill VENDOR --------> 6.02 Repro Graphics Repro6raph +901-4990-2116 1 302820 01/27 02192 Stationary SUaplies 46.63 101AL DUE VENDOR --------> 46.63 ff+ City of D i a s o n d Bar ++} RUN )IMF: 11:06 81/26/93 V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R Phr' 11 DUE THRU.............62/82/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + + PREPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.IINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOTCE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK, -----------------------------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RonKranzerlAssoc C.E. Inc RKA 1801-4551-5223 3 38212D 81/27 82/82 92 4843 Enqr Svcs-Pln Chk Fees 172.80 +881-4551-5223 5 382a2D 01/27 02/02 924126 Prof Svcs-Pln Check Fees 884.88 +001-4551-5223 7 332020 81127 62102 924809 Prof Svcs -Plan Checking 54.80 +881-4551-5221 1 30202D 01127 02/62 924643 Enqr Svcs -Inspections 97.58 +881-4551-5223 6 382823 01/21 82/02 921245 Prof Svcs -Plan Checking 21587.63 *101-4551-5221 2 Z0202D 01/27 02/02 .927425 Prof Svcs -Inspections 5,963.35 foal -4551-5223 4 302020 81/27 82/02 927425 Prof Svcs -Plan Check Fees 75.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 91753.46 Ruzicka, Joseph T. RuzickaJ +081-4358-4180 1 32202C 01127 82/02 Mtgs 11/19,12/17,1/7 128.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 120.00 S.C.J.P.I.A. PSBI +881-2110-1084 1 30282C 61127 02/02 Feb Dental Press 947.05 f681-2110-1666 1 30281C 61/27 82102 Feb Vision Press 277.40 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 1,224.45 S.C.M.A.F. SCMAF 4681-43;6-1200 5 30282U 01127 02/02 6665 Rec Supplies -Rule Books 106.01 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 126.$0 San Diega Princess SDPrinre +881-4018-2325 1 322620 61/27 02/82 Regions Conf-MacBride 215.62 TOTAL DUE VENDUR --------) 215.62 San Gabriel Vly Tribune SGVTribune +1014210-2115 5 382620 61127 62/02 sgvt6597 Pub Hrg-C11P 92 11 52.64 +061-4216-2115 7 31202D 61/27 02/82 sgvt6671 Pub Arg -ADR 92-28 ;36.63 +081-4218-2115 6 30212D 81127 02/62 sgvt6671 Pub Hrg-ADR 92-19 36.02 *001-4210-2115 9 31262D 01/27 02102 sgvt0672 RFP Block Brant 50.31 +001-4041-2115 3 312020 01/27 02/02 savt1706 Vacancy PrktRec Coss 21.16 *611-4210-2115 6 30212D 61127 02/82 sgvt6143 Pub 4rg-CUP 92-1 76.85 1UTAl DUE VENDOR --------) 276.89 Securicorp Int'1 Inc.. Securicurp +001-4553-5531. 1 38212D 01/28 02/02 15167 XngBuardSvc-Decl9S2 2.924.77 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 2,924.i7 }+� City of Diamond Bar *{} RUN MIME: 11:18 /1728/93 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 DUE THRU.............02/02193 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. * PREPAID * ACCOLINT PROJ.TX-NO ----------------------------------------------- BATCH PO.IINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVOT.CE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK. Siec.ke, Warren C. SieckeW *001-2331-1112 2 392120 0112T 02102 2889-12 TrffcSignal-EN93-002 1,036.50 *001-4553-5222 1 20202D 01/27 02/02 2890.6 Prof Trffc Engr Svcs 448.00 TUTA1 DUE VENDOR --------> 1,484.50 Sir S0,2edy SirSpeedy *101-2301-1811 4 30282D 01121 12112 10698 Copies for FPL 92-19 291.01 1001-2310-1010 5 312.12D 01/27 12102 11698 Copies for FPL 92-39 36.95 *001-2390-1111 6 302020 01/21 0242 10698 Copies for FPL 9316 133.96 *101-4351-1211 4 31262D 01/27 12112 11839 Recreation Supplies 273.69 *001-4090-2110 2 21203E 01/28 02102 11846 Stationary Supplies 217.96 101AL DUE VENDOR -------} v53.57 So Ca ASSOC. of C .-:z SCACEO *101-4211-2315 1 3-'?a2O 01/27 02/02 AnnftehDues-Flares 25.01 ?OiAL DUE VENDOR --------> 25.11 So. Ca. Joint Powers Ins. SQPIA *111-4611-7290 1 312020 01121 02/02 All Risk Prop Ins 1993 1,904.60 TOTAL DUE VENDER --------•> 1,904.01 Southern Ca gas Co SoCa6as f0al-431.3 2126 1 302020 01121 02/12 Gas Svcs --Heritage Prk 4.69 1O1AL DUE VENDOR --------} 4.69 Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison *001-4311-2126 1 312120 01/27 02/12 Elect Svcs -Paul Grow Prk 31.16 1001-4316-2126 1 30202D 11/27 02102 Elect Svcs -Maple Hill Prk 325.42 *8al-4319-2126 1 312020 01121 02102 Elect Svcs -Petersen Prk 34.17 *101 4331 2126 1 3/2/211 01127 02/02 Elect Svcs-Sycare Cyn 440.15 TUTAL DOE VENDOR --------) 831.40 Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison *250-431/-6415 04693 3 21203E 01128 02/02 Riser,CahleHookUp-Heritge 376.54 02/12/93 Oaaaa17@74 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 376.54 TOTAL DLIE VENDOR --------> 1.08 Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison */01-4555-2126 1 302920 01127 02i02 Elect Svcs-Trffc Control 4,018.49 TOTAL OUE VENDOR --------> 4,016.49 +++ City of Dia■ond Bar +++ RUN TIME: 11:68 61/28193 V 0 U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R PA6F 12 DUE THRU .............0212193 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + PKPAID + } ACCOUNT P901TI-NO ----------------------- ------------------------ BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE DESCRIPTION � AMOUNT DATE CHECK Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison *141-4541-2126 1 382820 01127 82/82 Elect Svcs -Dist t41 93.68 TOfAL DUE VENDOR --------> 93.61 Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison *139-4539-2126 1 302020 01127 02102 Elect Svcs -Dist 139 201.56 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 701.56 Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison *136-4536-2126 1 382020 01/27 02/02 Elect Svcs -Dist 936 160.45 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1.18.45 Standard Insurance of Ore Standardln *881-2118-1885 1 382820 61127 02182 Feb Sapp Life Ins Press 17.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 17.00 U.S. Postmaster U6Postsstr *881-4350-2128 1 28203E 61/28 62182 Senior Survey Mailing 268.00 82/02/93 0682017075 IOfAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 200.86 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 6.00 US Sprint I Sorint *001-4510-2125 1 382820 01127 02182 Engr Long Dist Phn Svc 2.75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 2.75 U.ltraSystems Engineers U1traSyste *801-2380-1010 7 382820 61/27 02/02 101819 Prof Svcs-FER 92-081 121811.38 *001-2300-1810 6 38282D 81/27 82102 101019 Prof Svr.s-FER 92-004 5,697.31 +881-2360-1818 9 382820 81/27 82102 101019 Prof Svcs-F,rR 92-002 1,626.84 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 20,335.53 UltraSystems Engineers UltraSyste *821-2388-1018 18 382820 01/27 82/02 111042 Prof Svcs-FER 92-861 12,836.26 *061-2300-1818 11 31208 01/27 62102 111042 Prof Svcs-FER 92-082 1,'128.41 *881-2300-1818 12 382020 81/27 82/02 111042 Prof 5vcs-FER 92-004 5,54.47 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 19,165.06 Unocal Unocal *001-4838-2318 2 24203L 01128 02/02 424733 Fuel -Mr 9.66 10fAL DUE VENDOR --------> 9.61 +++ City of D i a e a n d Bar +++ RUN TIME: 11:88 81/2.9193 V 0 U C H E if R E 6 I 5 T E R PA6E 13 DUE THRU .............02162/93 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + + PRCPA1D + + ACCOUNT PR31TI-ND BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICt DtSCRIF[ION AMDLINT DATE CHECK Ury, Donald UryD +881-4553-4188 3 30202D 61121 82182 T/T Mta 1114/93 46.06 TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------) 43.88 Walnut Vly Yater Dist WVWaterDis +881-4311-2126 2 382620 81127 82182 - Water Usage-Paul Grog 486.98 +801-4316-2126 2 382820 81/27 82162 Water Usage-Maple Hill 422.45 TOTAL DUE VENDOR-------) 929.35 Walnut Vly Water Dist WVVaterOis +139-4539-2126 2 382020 81/21 82162 Water Usage-Dist t39 145.65 IUTAL DUE VENDOR--------) 1k5.85 Whelan, Stephen P. WhelarSP +881-4358-4166 3 30202C 61/21 82162 Mtgs 11/19,12117,1/7 120.60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------> 12.8.89 Woo, James Woo3ares +681-2306-1816 13 38282D 61127 82182 Refund Dep Bal FPL 92--34 1,158.96 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 11158.8) Zellerbach Zellerbach +061-4956-1288 3 30282D 81/28 82162 119427811s Correction 179.63- +891-4950-1288 4 30262D 81128 82132 1194216115 Supplie5-Finance 84.65 +661-4996-1206 4 362820 61128 92/02 1194218115 Correction 179.64- +961-4699-1296 5 302@2D 61/28 82102 119427811s Supplies-General 214.42 +881-4656-1208 2 302020 62/1486 61127 62162 1194276115 Supplies-Finance 179.63 {801-4099-1209 2 39202D 91/1496 91/27 02/82 119427911s Supplies-Gen Goyt 119.64 TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------> 359.27 TOTAL PREPAID-----------> 47,913.29 TOTAL DUE--------------> 466,64.2.72 1OfAL REPORT -----------> 533,976.81 t++ City of D i a a a n d Bar +++ RUN 1IMF: 11:8A 81/28193 V 0 U C H E A R E 6 I 5 T E R FUND 3UMMARY REPORT DUE THRU.............02/02/92 DISBURSE GIL GJE WILL POST GJE_ HAS POSTED FUND TOTAL DIRECT PAY" itEVENUE W ENSE 14EVENUE EXPENSE ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 General Fund 4991966.18 127,82.8.96 139 LLAD 939 Fund 7,841.61 13A LLAD 938 Fund 314/5.28 2Sd C.I.P. Fund 2,652.94 227 Traffic Mit Fee 456.88 225 Grand Av Const F 17,256.88 112 Prap A -Transit F 3,048.56 141 LLAD 941 Fund 93.68 MAL------------ ----------------------------------- - ALL FUNDS 533,976.81 127,820.99 PA6c 1 FUTURE TRANSACTIONS REVENUE }XFME ---------------------- Y75.75 371.853.37 7,041.61 3,4;5.2) 2,652.94 4;6.8) 11,256.88 3,848.56 93.68 ------------ ------••----- 275.75 405,674.29 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 p, REPORT DATE: January 19, 1993 FROM: Linda G. Magnuson;- Accounting Manager TITLE: Treasurer's Report - December 31, 1992 SUMMARY: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of December 1992. RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Resolution(s) Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office) Other 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: kiq LI-- V� Terrence L. Belan r Linda G. Ma nson City Manager Accounting Ma ager Yes_ No Yes X No _ Yes X No _ Yes X No CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - December 31, 1992 ISSUE STATEMENT: Per City policy, the Finance department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the December, 1992 Treasurer's Statement. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of December 1992. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances and investment account balances. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT December 31, 1992 GENERAL FUND $4,047,500.10 $1,033,560.38 $683,222.80 ($5,244.30) 4 392 593.38 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 8,931.62 8,931.62 GASTAXFUND 2,456,883.73 198,549.47 586.03 (151,739.46) 2,503,107.71 TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD 676,391.66 50,736.00 16,763.05 710,364.61 TRANSIT TX (PROP C) FD 608,098.06 608,098.06 FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND 0.00 0.00 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD 18,717.23 6,727.35 8,251.07 17,193.51 OTS FUND 0.00 0.00 AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD 33,598.28 14,810.97 5,561.89 42,847.36 STATE PARK GRANT FUND 0.00 0.00 PARK FEES FUND 181,990.97 181,990.97 COM DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND (2,939.21) 1,306.26 1,324.04 (2,956.99) LANDSCAPE DIST#38 FD 35,418.53 102,342.00 21,926.04 115,834.49 LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD 123,881.57 36,691.20 18,789.56 141,783.21 LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD 76,145.57 48,862.80 6,925.47 118,082.90 GRAND AV CONST FUND 490,763.86 1,107.56 489,656.30 TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE FD 302,806.57 302,806.57 CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD 53,012.53 156,983.76 156,983.76 53,012.53 SB 821 FUND 133,195.33 133,195.33 SELF INSURANCE FUND 357,066.80 357,066.80 TOTALS $9,601,463.20 $1,493,586.43 $921,441.27 $0.00 $10,173,608.36 SUMMARY OF CASH: DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT $231,293.92 PAYROLL ACCOUNT 236.43 CHANGE FUND 100.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00 INVESTMENTS: TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS $232,130.35 TIME CERTIFICATES $0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00 L.A.I. F. 9,941,478.01 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 9,941,478.01 TOTAL CASH $10,173,608.36 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DECEMBER 10, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Chavers called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Gravdahl. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Ury, Cheng, Beke, Vice Chairman Gravdahl, and Chairman Chavers. Also present were Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra, Traffic Engineer Warren Siecke, Sergeant Rawlings, and Contract Secretary Liz Myers. MINUTES: C/Ury requested the Minutes of November 12, 1992 be first line, to indicate that 1992 amended on page 8, the corrections", "the he "amend etheo Nov. 12, threce second toended lasts i line to indicate deposit plus...". C/Cheng requested that the minutes be amended on page 8 to properly spell the words "indicate" and "read". C/Beke and VC/Gravdahl will be abstaining from voting on the minutes of November 12, 1992 because they were not present during that meeting. Motion was made by C/Ury, seconded by C/Cheng and CARRIED to approve the Minutes of November 12, 1992, as amended. a n d AYES: COMMISSIONERS: U r y, C h e n g, Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: C/Beke and VC/Gravdahl. COMMISSION C/Ury, referring to the Quail Summit area recently the restriping of the COMMENTS: resurfaced, inquired when be completed. intersections with stop signs will AA/Aberra indicated that those areas will be painted once the slurry seal has been inspected. C/Beke requested that the matter regarding the 3 way stop sign on Brea Canyon Road/Pathfinder Road be placed on next month's agenda, with a staff report as to the reason why the sign cannot be installed immediately, as was recommended repeatedly by the Commission. He also expressed his concern that the staff report, to the City Council, regarding the Grand Ave./Gold Nugget issue, did not accurately convey the Commission's action. December 10, 1992 page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Clem Ziroli from the First Mortgage Corporation, expressed his concern with the posting of the "2 Hour Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m." signs at The Fallow Field/Brea Canyon Cut-off Road area. posting of the signs creates an unsafe environment for the employees, who either must move their cars every two hours, or park on Brea Canyon Cut-off Road. A stop sign should be placed at Brea Canyon Cut-off Road so that the employees could park in He that area, and safely cross the intersection. inquired why parking has been prohibited along westerly side of Fallow Field Drive directly across from the building even though no homes are impacted- there. mpactedthere. Chair/Chavers explained that the signs have been posted as an attempt to resolve the problem of people parking in that residential neighborhood. Staff has been directed to post the signs, monitor the results, and report back to the Commission. He explained to Mr. Ziroli that it is not the responsibility of the citizens of Diamond Bar to provide parking for businesses on every street. C/Ury stated that he was under the impression that the signs were not to extend to the building area on either side of the street. Sgt. Rawlings noted that the signs are posted on the north and south side of the street, however, on the south side of the street, the signs do not begin until the first residential home. The community service officer has issued warnings as directed by the Council. Chair/Chavers suggested that staff determine why the signs along the hillside bank on the north side of Fallow Field Drive the street were posted. If it is determined that the signs need to be bagged, then staff is to handle it administratively. INFORMATIONAL Hardy Strozier, Project Manager of the South Pointe ITEMS: Master Plan, gave a brief overview of the project description, as presented in the draft EIR. The Intro of following is a summarization of that overview: the South Pointe proposed 171 acre project site is located north of Project Pathfinder Road, and west of Brea Canyon Road; there is an existing 30 acre temporary South Pointe Middle School located on the project site, and part of the project is to complete the final grading in order to construct the permanent school; there are three tracts associated with this project, totaling approximately 100 lots ranging in size from 8,000 to 10,000 square feet; there is a proposed 31 -acre December 10, 1992 Page 3 commercial site; there is a proposed 8 to 10 -acre community park site; there is an approximate 2 -acre land transfer from the City's existing Larkstone Park to the Walnut Valley Unified School District; there has been a 4 -acre acquisition of land by the City from the Water District; there will be a transfer or vacation of 6 acres of City -owned land to the developers; there will be a transfer of 10 to 15 acres of commercial property to the City; and there will be a transfer of 8 to 10 acres of usable community park site to the City. Mr. Strozier pointed out that the majority of the Commission's traffic issues can be found in section IV, of the draft EIR, on page IV -93, which gives a brief and thorough evaluation of the impacts of the existing condition in that area, as well as an evaluation of the existing conditions plus the project in its phase one and phase two anticipated configuration. The mitigation measures are on page IV -99. The draft EIR, chapter VI, page VI -31, outlines various alternatives to the project, dealing with different street and land use configurations that are site specific to the various subdivisions. A traffic consultant will be available next time this matter is brought before the Commission to respond to the Commission's concerns regarding traffic management and on-site traffic configurations. The draft EIR was circulated on November 30, 1992, and the environmental review period will close on January 18, 1993. The Commission will receive the responses made, to the comments received on the draft EIR from other public agencies and interested persons. Jan Dabney, Senior Partner of JC Dabney & Associates, stated that both Arciero and RNP Development have been attempting to develop their parcels for a few years. The City requested that all the owners get together and develop the entire 171 acres as a planned project. The plan is well represented, and includes mitigation measures to help alleviate the traffic problems, associated with the South Pointe Middle School, in that neighborhood. The City is also requesting that the developers participate immediately, upon approval of the project, in the improvements of Pathfinder Road, the overpass, and Brea Canyon Road. Hardy Strozier, per Chair/Chavers' request, explained that he is retained by the City of Diamond Bar to act as project manager, to manage a series of consultants that have been utilized in the preparation of the Master Plan and a Development Agreement, to assist in the review of December 10, 1992 Page 4 the various entitlement documents, tentative tract maps, and so forth, and to help construct the various findings and statements that will be required by the Commissions, and the Council, as part of the planning process. OLD BUSINESS: AA/Aberra presented the staff report regarding the installation of a request made by a citizen for the Cut through "No Right Turn, between 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m." sign, and Country View Drive at traffic on on Rolling Knoll Road in to mitigate cut -through Quail Summit Grand Ave., order from Diamondtraffic on Quail Summit Drive from Diamond Bar Dr. Bar Blvd. to Boulevard to Grand Ave. Grand Ave. Warren Siecke stated that the technique of prohibiting right turns during certain hours in residential areas has been effective in the past. "No Therefore, it is recommended that, initially, a Right Turn, between 4:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday" sign be installed on Rolling Knoll Road at Rolling Grand Avenue along with a W-41 sign on the traffic signal at Grand Knoll in advance of Ave. If motorists do begin to turn on to Country View Drive off of Rolling Knoll Road, to access , Grand Ave., then the same kind of restriction at the Country View Drive/Grand Ave. intersection can be implemented, if deemed necessary. AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury, stated that the residents were not notified of this proposed action because it was staff's understanding that the matter may be postponed to the January, 1993 meeting and discussed along with the matter of the right turn lane on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Grand Avenue. C/Beke noted that many motorists will get trapped within that neighborhood because they can get into the area but are not allowed access out. Chair/Chavers pointed out that cut through traffic is a learned behavior. Those using the route know the area, and will find out quickly that it cannot be used any longer. He inquired if a sign can be installed to warn motorists of the proposed restriction so that they do not get trapped and wander around more streets than necessary. Warren Siecke suggested that a warning sign can be posted at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Quail Summit Drive that indicates "No Right Turn at Diamond Bar and Rolling Knoll". December 10, 1992 Page 5 C/Beke pointed out that the "Local Access Only" sign at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Quail Summit Drive did not stop the cut -through traffic. He indicated that, normally, he would be opposed to this type of action, however, in this case, he concurs with staff because the residents will not want to, for the most part, turn right at those hours of the day. Mike Hemy, resident of Chino Hills, with an office at Fallow Field Dr./Diamond Bar Blvd., inquired if the signs have been requested because of increased accidents in that neighborhood. Chair/Chavers explained that there is a queue of 5 to 10 cars waiting to turn right from Rolling Knoll, most going to Chino Hills. There have not been any accidents largely because the children in that neighborhood do not play outside during the week because of the increase in traffic. Mike Hemy stated that he feels the traffic problem coming from Diamond BarBlvd. on to Brea Canyon Cut-off Road heading towards Fairway is a much more serious problem than this residential problem in which no accidents have occurred. Chair/Chavers pointed out that the two situations are not the same. There are financial considerations for a signal on Brea Canyon Cut-off, Road and there are technical and legal considerations why a stop sign cannot be installed. Don Lemly, residing at 1387 Rolling Knoll Road, expressed his concern that if a sign is not also installed at Country View Drive, the traffic will just reroute to that street. He suggested that the time of the restriction be extended to 7:00 p.m. Debbie Renegar, residing at 1386 Rolling Knoll Road, stated that she had also requested, at the November meeting, that a blinking light be installed just before the Rolling Knoll Road/Quail Summit Drive intersection to warn motorists of the upcoming traffic signal. That same intersection needs to be restriped. She concurred that the right turn restriction signs need to be posted on Country View Drive as well, and that the time be extended to 7:00 p.m. She requested that the signs be installed as soon as possible and that the matter not be postponed to January of 1993. Warren Siecke stated that staff's suggestion, that the signs be as least restrictive as possible, was December 10, 1992 Page 6 so not to inconvenience the neighborhood anymore than necessary. Staff has no objection, if the neighborhood is willing, to accept those hours from 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 p.m.. C/Ury stated that the matter should have been noticed so that further input could have been provided. It is reasonable to request that something be done to keep intrusion traffic out of their neighborhood. If the signs are installed, then he would recommend that there be a period of time to notice motorists of the upcoming restrictive signs. VC/Gravdahl concurred. C/Cheng concurred that the signs should be installed at Country View Drive as well because the street may become congested if placed only at Rolling Knoll Road. Chair/Chavers stated that, though he supports the restrictive signs, there needs to be more of an open forum notifying the public of this proposed action. Once the signs are installed, there will be an increase of traffic milling throughout the neighborhood for several weeks, which could upset a lot of residents. He suggested that staff contact the corner house, facing east on Rolling Knoll Road abutting up to Grand Ave., to see if they would allow a construction panel sign on their property for a couple of weeks to warn motorists of the proposed restrictive signs. Once the signs go up, the Sheriff Department would then issue warnings for the five-day period, and then issue citations. C/Beke, concurring with C/Ury that if, a sign is posted on Country View Drive , motorists may take a left turn during rush hour, at an unsignalized intersection, to cross Grand Avenue, inquired if there is a way to avoid that situation. He suggested that the sign be posted at Rolling Knoll Road first, and if there is a problem than change it to Country View Drive , with some advanced notice that there is no outlet there during rush hour. Chair/Chavers suggested that the item be tabled, with direction to staff to provide formal notice to the residents, and include a specific procedure as to how this process will occur, such as the posting of the large advance warning sign for a designated period of time, and the following kinds of restrictive signs to be posted, and their locations. December 10, 1992 Page 7 C/Ury suggested that a "Not a Through Street" sign be posted at Deer Crossing Drive so that the motorists could circle around, and eventually end up back down at Grand Ave. and Diamond Bar Blvd. There are alternate solutions, and a little bit more investigation should take place on it. He concurred that the residents should be notified. Don Lemly suggested that the signs be installed to see what the reaction will be. There will always be some objections to change regardless what is done. If an issue arises that cannot be dealt with, then the signs can be bagged until it is resolved. Debbie Renegar pointed out that they have come before the Commission with this issue a year ago. We are the people who care and who are consistently here year after year. She suggested that the signs be posted first to draw out any comments from the residents. Motion was made by VC/Gravdahl and seconded by C/Ury to request staff to give legal notification to the residents, with a specific plan included in that notification, to include Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive for the warning signs and the restrictive signs as recommended by staff, and brought back to the January, 1993 Commission meeting. C/Ury reiterated that the residents should be notified before a decision is made. Staff needs to investigate other alternatives because he is concerned that people will make a left hand turn at Grand Ave. and Country View Drive. There is probably a better solution than no right turns at both locations. C/Beke pointed out that a better solution is prohibiting a right turn on Quail Summit at Diamond Bar Blvd., however, the community may not want to live with that. There will probably not be a great demand for those residents to make that right turn during those hours. C/Cheng suggested a permit system to allow the neighboring tract to make a right turn. Chair/Chavers explained that a permit idea has been brought to the attention of the City Manager and the Council, and the response has been that the City is not in the position to fund such a program. December 10, 1992 Page 8 AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury's inquiry if staff can give notification in time to bring the matter back in January of 1993, stated that staff will send out notification of the proposed signs immediately. The Commission voted upon VC/Gravdahl. the Motion made by AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, VC/Gravdahl, Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Cheng, and Remove Parking AA/Aberra reported that, pursuant to the November 12, 1992, staff Restrictions Commission's request of has a site plan identifying the lane on Colima Rd. of provided designations and street dimensions to study Colima east Lemon Ave. potential traffic movement conflicts on The owner of Charlie's Road, east of Lemon Avenue. Sandwich Shoppe is requesting the removal of the existing ,No Stopping Anytime" sign on the north and is side of Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue, of a 2 -hour parking requesting the consideration restriction sign in front of the shopping center in load order to provide delivery trucks an area to smaller vehicles to and unload, thus allowing maneuver easier within the current parking lot. It the is recommended that the Commission recommend to "No City Council the removal of the existing Parking Anytime signs and install "2 -hour parking" signs in front of the shopping center. Charles Ricotta, residing at 20651 Colima Road, Walnut, owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, expressed his support for staff's recommendation. Sgt. Rawlings reiterated the Sheriff's Department's opposition to the continued expansion of time parking controls because of the difficulty in enforcement. C/Beke stated that there needs to be some striping to channelize the 36 foot area to protect motorists exiting the driveway, to include another through lane, and designate a right -turn only lane. Chair/Chavers, concurring with C/Beke, stated that he is not opposed to the parking scenario, but is uncomfortable that street is in an untenable position. Staff can take care of the channelization plan without bringing it back to the commission. December 10, 1992 Page 9 C/Beke stated that the channelization plan is to striped, the right include a second through lane lane striped, and stripe at least 10 or 12 turn feet out from the curb so that there is room to truck. pull out of that driveway and see around a Charles Ricotta, in response to C/Ury, stated that for the 2 -hour parking is needed for added parking as for deliveries. the customers, as well C/Ury pointed out that even with a 2 -hour parking inside the parking area, the trucks may still park handle the situation area. A loading zone may better than a 2 -hour parking zone. Charlie Ricotta stated that a 2 -hour parking sign would allow parking for either customers or delivery trucks. C/Ury suggested that the area be left without the be "No Parking" signs, and the employees should in the street to let the instructed to park out the convenience of parking inside customers have the lot. This would probably promote less movement of traffic. C/Beke pointed out that the City does not want overnight parking of rigs on Colima Road. Chair/Chavers stated that since the owner feels he has no that the 2 -hour parking would work, objection to the recommendation made. However, if the 2 -hour parking does not work, then the owner next set of should be responsible to pay for the signs. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by UNANIMOUSLY to accept Chair/Chavers and CARRIED recommendation, with the provisions that staff's the #2 traffic lane, a right turn only lane, be the lane be far striped through there, and that so that the cars exiting the enough from the curb around the parked vehicles. driveway can see hen AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, VC/Gravdahl, a n d Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Policy AA/Aberra reported that the Commission requested are served by Statement that the current locations, which guards, be identified and ranked for estab. adult crossing accordingly. Based on the counts of school warrants for children, conducted during the week of September adult crossing December 10, 1992 Page 10 guards 14, 1992, staff has compiled the following list, as presented in the staff report. It is recommended that the Commission adopt the attached policy for determining crossing guard warrants. C/Beke stated that there is not a crossing guard at the intersection of Golden Springs Drive/Ballena Road, but at Ballena Drive/Meadow Falls Drive, and that he doubts there are 416 average daily trips at that location. AA/Aberra stated that the number is the total count made throughout the day. C/Beke noted also that the Ballena Drive/Meadow Falls Drive intersection should not be priority #1 because it is within 200 feet of a signalized controlled intersection, and is not eligible for a crossing guard under the warrants. Chair/Chavers explained that the list is simply a ranking list according to the number of students. The crossing guards are all grandfathered in for the year. He had requested this list for some measure to be provided for purpose of comparison, and not for ranking. Warren Siecke, in response to C/Beke, confirmed that, typically, a crossing guard is not warranted if it is 200 feet within a signalized intersection. He suggested that the Commission consider a ranking scheme where the number of conflicts of vehicles vs. children are looked at. Chair/Chavers pointed out that CalTrans has never had control of a residential street in it's entire existence. They created their warrants for two lane highways that had no driveways, and had high speed traffic. Those warrants are for their own use, and not a municipal based warrants. C/Beke concurred with Chair/Chavers, but pointed out that there are other warrants available, such as LA County. Motion was made by VC/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Ury and CARRIED to adopt staff's recommendation. and AYES: COMMISSIONERS= Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Cheng. ITEMS FROM C/Ury noted that the next meeting date will be COMMISSIONERS: January 14, 1993. December 10, 1992 Page 11 Sgt. Rawlings reported that there wassouth tfatal ITEMS FROMof STAFF: accident on Brea Canyon Cut-off, Pathfinder. C/Beke stated that the City may need the help of the Sheriff Department within n the determining iy or 1f the County accident happened boundary. C/Ury suggested that staff, in the future, not try to out guess the Commission's action, and that notification be given when so requested. ADJOURNMEAI'r Motion was made by Chair/Chavers, seconded by VC/Gravdahl and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 8:22 p.m. Respectively, 5/ George A. Wentz George A. Wentz Secretary Attest: /s/ Todd Chavers Todd Chavers Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Fermin Bitolas, the applicant, stated that he has been operating his dry cleaning establishment, at the Plaza Diamond Bar, since 1972, from the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday. He stated that he is in concurrence with the recommendations prepared by staff. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 23, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman MacBride called the meeting to order Quality at 7:10 p.m. at the South Coast Air Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Grothe. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Meyer, Grothe, and vice Chairman MacBride. Chairman Flamenbaum arrived at 7:20 p.m.. Commissioner Li was absent. Also present were Community Development Director James DeStefano, Associate Planner Robert Searcy, Planning Technician Ann Lungu, Interim City Engineer George Wentz, Deputy City Attorney Craig Fox, and Contract Secretary Liz Myers. CONSENT CALENDAR: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Grothe and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Minutes of Minutes of November 9, 1992, as presented. Nov. 9, 1992 PUBLIC HEARINGS: PT/Lungu presented the staff report regarding the request, made by the applicant Fermin and Margaret CUP 92-10 Bitolas, to permit an existing dry cleaning business to install a dry cleaning plant on the premises, located at the Plaza Diamond Bar center, 2020 S. Brea Canyon Rd. #A-4. A dry cleaning plant is permitted in this zone by right, provided that a conditional use permit is first obtained. However, when the applicant submitted plans to the City for reconstruction, following a fire that destroyed a portion of that shopping center, it was realized that a CUP had not been obtained per Section 22.28.210 of the Los Angeles County Code. The City allowed the applicant to continue doing business during and after reconstruction, as long as an application for a CUP was submitted for review and approval of the Planning Commission. PT/Lungu reviewed the application analysis and the environmental assessment, as presented in the staff report. It is recommended that the Commission approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and CUP 92-10 with the Findings of Fact and conditions listed. VC/MacBride declared the Public Hearing opened. Fermin Bitolas, the applicant, stated that he has been operating his dry cleaning establishment, at the Plaza Diamond Bar, since 1972, from the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday. He stated that he is in concurrence with the recommendations prepared by staff. CARL WARREN & CO. ACW Inst"a"te Adlusters Claims Administrators P.O. Bax 25180 Santa Ane, CSA 92799.5180 (714) 740-7999 FAX: (714) 740-7992 TO: City of Diamond Bar Attention: L. Burgess Re: Claim: Claimant: D/Event: Recd Y/Office: Our File: a_,;,_ q3 Date: Jan. 26, 1993 93-01 Linda Roseli 1-17-93 1-20-93 S 72095 AB We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. j� CLAIM INSUFFICIENCY: In accordance with the telephone conversation o , 19 , a notice of insufficiency must be mailed to the claimant no later than 1.9..THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORIGINAL CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SUBMIT A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Sections 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910—.4—.- AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL 10. . AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant, refecting this additional/amended claim. LATE CLAIM RESPONSE: Return the original claim material to the claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only recourse is to file a written "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim". (Retain copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SEND A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Section 911.4. [] APPLICATION REJECTION: Reject claimant's "Application for Leave to Present a Late C aim". See Government Code Section 911.8. [] TAKE NO ACTION: Defer any written response to the claimant pending our urther advice. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. j ry t my yours, RL WRREN & C MPANY (A ste ) -- L-LAi vi FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than,6 ►nos. after MR occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to reO property must be fiLed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Cod*1111.2) 3. Read entire claim, before g. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915a) To: The City of Diamond Bar Name of Claimant Home Address of Claimant' Cit red State i E _ Business Address of Claima$ City and State CLAIM 1�Ta.------- ----__--- e of lalmant if natural person) 4 _ 6 Telephone Number Business Telephone Number Cave address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: /JbS,94wecl� i How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. ee CGCG �/.�� `✓ L,Jr�.S When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day: 6411 �/ QtAld / 7 /V 4eoatA /10fdd PM Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give street names and addresses and measurements from Iandmar VA'hat particular AI damage, if known: or OMISSION do you claim caused injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or What DAMAGE or INJ claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed. What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of da a of presentation of this claim, giving basis of computation: Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis of computation: `7% -SD SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE ajfi What DAMAGE or INJ claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed. What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of da a of presentation of this claim, giving basis of computation: Give ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each item of prospective injury or damage, giving basis of computation: `7% -SD SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE Insurance payments received, if any, ant nes of Insurance Comp�Pf ;,f/ er� Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: (Date—Item) 7 9.. -?v — PW' 4ep_,, f}-c,E57�- (Amount) Name and address of Witnesses, Doctors Doctors and Hospitals: READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident by 'B-1" and the point of impact by "X." NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS 7A\ FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS �U SIDEWALK I SI of Claimant or persoII�filing on his behalf giving I Typed Name: P to Claimant: 7 L/N�� iQ05�Gi CLATMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (GOV. CODE SEC. 915a). CURB D to up". AAOE-- 91733 (Ole 43 �i s. Rofrr�T��� j '986 VOLKSWAGEN 4D SEDAN FW00542 T! Windshield 2SX55 452.05isi 1.7 -Labor at rate) Uretnare 'Kit- w/ DW 8.50 S.50 TOTAL LASOR, (NON—, All Material ao* an US lRj0lC@pranrNeed is to be as OW Is not safety glazed m&WW so mark" It Is "N -m -aft ng be gimmed in a"haurdow as defined by ft Corwimer Product Smilety Commission. Alt mardiandin rollmned IIbr Croft reftind or exchange be in M810able condftn, auVwInd %r mg6d,619.114a. No returns retum, DWOMmftd IIV Oft M061M and nwy be ,,. :,m," will be sPe" Ordws or cut fat O@Wawm of PSYNISM are dft* from invoice date. A swvkm r"wee, Of % PW "Mmk 4 % annum) will be added to Past dw accounts. RECEIVED BY: nw !71 =hu bran ropjaced / r"mired wo ow w" W�&*Mft 10 conme" 60 pay ww "wo amme ftwk / QNS chargft - rtp@W& I 60. 00 179. '.1 7 � magubmtIon,ana r dbvc#y for the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager PORT DATE: January 28, 1993 MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 FROM: Bob Rose, Director of Community Services TITLE: Acceptance of the Installation of Parkway Trees in the City of Diamond Bar. SUMMARY: The City Council, at their regular meeting of June 16, 1992, awarded the contract for the the purchase and installation of parkway trees in Diamond Bar to Artistic Landscape and Engineering, , lowest responsible bidder. The work has been completed for a total cost of $28,300 and is prepared to be accepted by the City. C' C n.-;] accept the work performed by Artistic RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the ity ou Landscape and Engineering, Inc. and authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Notice of Completion 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed — Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority eS X No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? — Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? — Which Commission? Yes X No $. Are other departments affected by the report? — Report discussed with the following affected departments: IREIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belanger ob Rose City Manager Community Services Director nEivRDiiTu n[uti[JTIu oY AND WHEN RECORDEC MAIL TO / Name City of Diamond Bar Street 21660 E. Copley Dr., Ste. 100 Adiress City s Diamond Bar, CA 91765 4177 State L SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: y 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar 3. The full address of the owner is 21660 E. Copley Dr. Ste. 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 4177 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. (If other than fee. strike "In fee- and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract or purchase;' or "lessee") 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 28, 1993 _ The work done was: Purchase and Installation of Parkway Trees in the City of Diamond Bar 1. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Artistic Landscape June 25, 1992 (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none'*.) (Date of Contract) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Diamond Bar Los Angeles 233 Parkway Trees along County of g State of California, and is described as tallows: Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar Boulevard and Golden Springs Drive in the City of Diamond Bar. 9. The street address of said property is None (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert "none".) Dated: 1/28/93 Verification for Individual Owner VERIFICATION Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner named in paragraph 2 or his agent I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Manager the declarant of the foregoing (-President of". "Manager of , "A partner of, "owner of". etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 28 1993_ at Diamond Bar California. (Date of signature.) (city where signed.) (Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the notice of completion are true) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 5-1 TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 28, 1993 FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director TITLE: Acceptance of the Landscape Improvements on Temple Avenue in the City of Diamond Bar. SUMMARY: The City Council, at their regular meeting of July 5, 1992, awarded the contract for the construction of Landscape Improvements on Temple Avenue in the City of Diamond Bar. Liquid Flow Engineering, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, was awarded the contract for a total amount of $28,915. The landscape improvements have been completed and are ready to be accepted by the City. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the work performed by Liquid Flow Engineering, Inc., and authorize the City Clerk to file the proper Notice of Completion. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) — Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Notice of Completion 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? — Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: errence L. Belanger b Rose City Manager Community Services Director IF RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECCRDED MAIL TO Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: . 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar I The full address of the owner is 2166_0 E. Copley Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. (If other than fee, stake "In fee" and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract of purchase,,, or 'lessee') S. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 28, 1993 . The work done was: Landscape Improvements on Temple Ave in the City of Diamond Bar 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Liquid Flow Engineering, Inc July 20, 1992 (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none'.) (Date of Contract) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Diamond Bar County of Los Angeles , State of California, and is described as follows: South side of Temple Avenue between Golden'Springs Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard 9. The street address of said property is None (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert "none".) Dated: January 28, 1993 Verification for Individual Owner VERIFICATION Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner named in paragraph 2 or his agent I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Manager the declarant of the foregoing ("President of", "Manager of". "A partner of", "Owner of", etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 28 19_23 at Diamond Bar California. (Date of signature.) (City where signed.) (Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the n^!ke of ccmole'ion aro r,,, t Name City of Diamond Bar Street 21660 E. Ad_ress Copley Dr., Ste. 100 City& Diamond State Bar, CA 91765 4177 I L J SPACE ABOVE THIS L ' NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: . 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar I The full address of the owner is 2166_0 E. Copley Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. (If other than fee, stake "In fee" and insert, for example. "purchaser under contract of purchase,,, or 'lessee') S. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 28, 1993 . The work done was: Landscape Improvements on Temple Ave in the City of Diamond Bar 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Liquid Flow Engineering, Inc July 20, 1992 (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert "none'.) (Date of Contract) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Diamond Bar County of Los Angeles , State of California, and is described as follows: South side of Temple Avenue between Golden'Springs Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard 9. The street address of said property is None (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert "none".) Dated: January 28, 1993 Verification for Individual Owner VERIFICATION Signature of owner or corporate officer of owner named in paragraph 2 or his agent I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Manager the declarant of the foregoing ("President of", "Manager of". "A partner of", "Owner of", etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 28 19_23 at Diamond Bar California. (Date of signature.) (City where signed.) (Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the n^!ke of ccmole'ion aro r,,, t November 23, 1992 Page 2 VC/MacBride declared the Public Hearing closed. Chair/Flamenbaum, upon his arrival at 7:20, presided over the meeting. Motion was made by C/Meyer and seconded by VC/MacBride to approve the draft Resolution, with the Findings of Fact and conditions listed, including the two additional conditions attached to the staff report. C/Grothe suggested that the condition, for the hours of operation, be amended to be more generically worded, to read, "Hours of operation are between 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., on Saturday." The Commission concurred. C/Meyer concurred to amend his motion to include the amendment made by C/Grothe to condition #2, of the additional conditions attached to the staff report. The Commission voted upon the Motion as presented, and amended, by C/Meyer. The motion was UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CUP 92-9 AP/Searcy presented the staff report regarding the request, made by the applicant PACTEL CELLULAR, to locate an unmanned cellular telephone site of telephone transmitting equipment, installed within a vacant leased 665 square foot interior area, located at 23555 Golden Springs Drive, including roof top antennas and dishes to be located on the western portion of the building. The use is conditionally permitted within Zone C-1, pursuant to section 22.28.110 of Title 22 of the Planning and Zoning Code. AP/Searcy reviewed the application analysis and the environmental assessment, as presented in the staff report. It is recommended that the Commission approve the draft Resolution, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Findings of Fact and conditions. Chair/Flamenbaum, concerned with the choices of paint on radiating elements, suggested that the applicant be required to have the paint closely approximate the color of the building, as opposed to requiring the paint types to match. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing opened. November 23, 1992 Page 3 Larry Levin, 3 Park Plaza, Irvine, inquired why conditions 11, #2, and #5, of the Engineering Department Conditions, are required for a cellular telephone company. ICE/Wentz concurred that condition #5 should be deleted. In regards to condition #1 and #2, he explained that upon review of a CUP, the on site conditions, and the street conditions immediately adjacent to the particular site, are reviewed to seek improvement, when deemed appropriate. Recognizing that this application has limited traffic impacts, comments were limited to an on site problem relating to parking delineation, and a minimal contribution towards capital costs were requested for slurry sealing type improvements. It is not uncommon to request participation, from an engineering perspective, on these types of improvements. Ann Rogers, the applicant's radio frequency design engineer, responding to C/Grothe's inquiries, made the following comments: the whip antennae is for future digital use, and will not be mounted until a later date; the microwave dish is used, instead of lease lines from Pac Bell, to connect us to the MTSO (switching center), which helps to connect the mobile telephones to the regular Pac Bell or GTE service; and the microwave are very directional antennas. C/Grothe noted that the microwave and the whip antennas are explicitly excluded from a couple of the cellular poles in town. He inquired what the effect will be to these antennas if there is a 3 story building blocking the entire property in from the freeway. Ann Rogers indicated that cellular would have somewhat of a problem, and microwave would not work because it is a point to point service. Often times the dish has to be relocated. In response to C/Meyer's inquiry if cellular will have any effect on ham radios, she explained that cellular is governed and regulated by the FCC. C/Meyer suggested that, because this is a local control measure, a condition be added that requires PACTEL to work with the neighbors to come up with a solution in case they complain that it is effecting their radio operations. Larry Levin, in response to Chair/Flamenbaum's inquiries, stated the following: since the November 23, 1992 Page 4 engineers have it designed for the indicated height, aimed at another microwave dish, the problem stemming from a 3 story building would have to be addressed as it arises; the whips are 15 feet; the paint will match in color of building, and not the exact paint type; and the whips can installed now, but it is anticipated that they won't be in use for another year. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing closed. C/Meyer noted that condition #3 and #4, of the Engineering Department Conditions, are covered under the Planning Department's condition #2, and should be deleted along with condition #5. He then indicated that he does not see the correlation of requiring the applicant to pay an additional $2,500 for slurry sealing public streets for a project that staff has indicated generates a minimal amount of traffic. Condition #1, of the Engineering Department Conditions, can remain because the landlord will most likely maintain his own property to keep his tenant. Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the grant time be extended from one year to two years. Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the draft Resolution for CUP 92-9, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Findings of Fact and conditions, amending condition #3 to grant a two year extension, and deleting condition #2, #3, #4, and #5 of the Engineering Department Conditions. Chair/Flamenbaum recessed the meeting at 8:00 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:10 P.M. CUP 92-13 AP/Searcy presented the staff report regarding the request, made by the applicant Dong Min Lee, for a Karaoke Recording Studio in an existing commercial center, located at 20627 Colima Road, Bldg. No. 3. The application request is not a use which currently appears in the Los Angeles County Code, as adopted by the City of Diamond Bar. Therefore, staff has made a determination that the use is most consistent with a recording studio as listed in Title 22 section 28.160. AP/Searcy reviewed the application analysis and the conditions, as presented in the staff report, and made the following changes to the conditions: delete the words "and doors" from condition #5, and replace with "into the studio"; reword the last sentence of November 23, 1992 Page 5 condition #6 to read, "An international sign reflecting the preceding shall additionally be incorporated with the above sign."; delete "and at all times" from the end of condition #7; reword condition #15 to read, "No employees shall be utilized for any purpose other than as a cashier and directing patrons to studios. only an owner or manager may be required to instruct patrons on the use of equipment if conducted within a studio."; condition #17 should read, "Each studio shall provide a two foot by 4 foot fluorescent fixture with three lamps or equivalent illumination as approved by the building official."; and, since the Sheriff Department has indicated that they find it necessary that they have the ability along with City staff to inspect the premises at any time, condition #3 is amended to read, "The facility shall be subject to inspection by the City official and designees during hours of business.". The conditions listed are an attempt to reduce the potential undesirable occurrences associated with the use of private enclosed studio rooms, the conduct of the patrons within the studios, and the hours of operation as it relates to surrounding land uses. It is recommended that the Commission approve draft Resolution and the Findings of Fact and Conditions, as amended. VC/MacBride requested that "No Loitering", in condition #16, properly include the necessary quotation marks. C/Grothe noted that the applicant is being greatly restricted by condition #17, which limits him to florescent lighting. Foot candles are the accepted measure, and it may be more appropriate for this application. Chair/Flamenbaum noted that the 4 inch letter size, as indicated in condition #6, seems rather large, and the sign may be enormous. Staff presented a video tape, provided by the applicant, which showed an example of a Karaoke studio in downtown Los Angeles, in Koreatown. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing opened. Dong Lee, the applicant, explained that he is a Los Angeles riot victim who is interested, now, in starting a Karaoke establishment in Diamond Bar. He expressed his concern that the Korean youth do not have a place to go, between midnight and 4:00 November 23, 1992 Page 6 a.m., that will keep them out of trouble, off the streets, and away from alcohol, drugs, and gangs. The youth enjoy music, and listening to music together. They need a place to go, such as the studio, to stay out of trouble. There will not be any alcohol nor food served at the studio. He requested that the hours of operation be extended to Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and Friday and Saturday, 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. because these are the hours that are crucial for his business. He also noted that his daughter, who is opening a restaurant in the same shopping area, plans to stay open to 2:00 a.m., and people will want to be able to use his studio past the 12 midnight time conditioned by staff. C/Meyer inquired if Mr. Lee is planning on developing a social program, at his studio, designed to divert children from inappropriate activity. Dong Lee stated that he is not proposing any type of a social program. He only meant to imply that the studio would be of some benefit because the children will have some where to go during the night. The Karaoke machine is a computerized unit that allows an individual an opportunity to sing along with the music, while the lyrics are flashed across the screen, to tempo, with a background of your choice. In response to VC/MacBride's inquiry, he stated that Karaoke is enjoyed by all ages. Chair/Flamenbaum inquired if the applicant has read, and understands, the 21 conditions as presented by staff, and as amended by staff. He inquired if he is in concurrence with those conditions. Chair/Flamenbaum recessed the meeting at 9:00 P.M. to allow the applicant further opportunity to review the conditions presented, and amended, by staff. The meeting was reconvened at 9:07 p.m. Dong Lee stated that, after reviewing the conditions, he concurs with all the items except for the following: condition #4 - change the minimum window standard from 30% of the floor area to 216" x 21; condition #6 - change the 4" letter size requirement to a 2" requirement; condition #8 - change the hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 12 a.m., to 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; and condition #17 - require only that there be electric lighting. November 23, 1992 page 7 Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the applicant only be required to post a sign that reads, "No Alcohol Allowed", instead of the sign proposed by staff, keeping the 4" letter size requirement. The applicant concurred. C/Meyer suggested that the applicant be asked to prepare an appropriate sign that meets the approval of the Community Development Director. Chair/Flamenbaum inquired if the applicant concurs with all the conditions, as presented and amended by staff, except for condition #4, 16, #8, and #17. Dong Lee stated that he is in concurrence with all the conditions as presented, and amended, by staff, except for condition #4, #6, #8, and #17. Ms. Street, residing at 2237 Kella, Whittier, owner of Filmex Photo & Gifts located within Colima Plaza, stated that she is in favor of the Karaoke studio remaining open as late as 2:00 a.m. or later because it would provide added security by adding visibility during the night hours. Greg Kirkly, general partner of the owner of the property, residing at 10951 Oso Ave., Chadsworth, stated that 5 Karaoke studios, at once, applied for the vacant building, but Mr. Lee was the only applicant that concurred to prohibit food and all beverages on the premises. He made the following comments: a window requirement based on floor area would require a 6' x 7' window, which is quite expensive; a florescent lighting requirement would not be effective for the television screen; and a 2:00 a.m. time limit is reasonable, and a prevalent standard. He requested that the Commission be sensitive to the requests made by Mr. Lee, realizing that the other conditions, in the lease arrangement, are designed to amply regulate the business. C/Meyer inquired if there have been any complaints received from the residential neighbors complaining about any use in the center. Greg Kirkly stated that the only complaint they received was for the wall in the back, which was required by the County. The only other concern was in regards to the billiards project, discussed at the Planning Commission public hearing last year. None of those concerns mentioned at that hearing materialized. He stated that he would not have a November 23, 1992 Page 8 problem with the Karaoke studio remaining opened until 4:00 a.m. on the weekends. Dave Arlington, residing at 20615 E. Halopine Drive, owner of the Rocky Top Country Saloon in the City of Industry, stated that he is familiar with this type of operation because one is proposed next door to his saloon, and he has done research with the one opened in Rosemead. He stated the following concerns regarding this project: it creates a neighborhood security problem having people milling around till 4:00 a.m.; they should be required to provide a security guard, as other recreational activities are required to do so; alcohol can be obtained from the two convenience stores across the street, and drinking may occur in the parking area; the center does not have adequate lighting to warrant a public assembled area; there are a lot of children, from the grade school and the Junior High School, in the area because of the location of the bus stop; the studio has video capabilities, whereby youngsters could rent inappropriate videos and view them at this establishment; the establishment in Rosemead has been visited by policemen many times; the studio rooms are an enclosed environment, having low lights, and a couch, which encourages inappropriate activities; if they are listening to music, they will want to have something to eat or drink, and they will probably bring it in unnoticed; if the establishment becomes popular, there will be an overflow of parking; and such an establishment does not belong in a small center, so close to a residential area. He is opposed to the proposed project in his neighborhood. C/Meyer asked what type of security Mr. Arlington is required to provide at his place of business. Dave Arlington stated that they are required, by a Cup, to maintain security, both internal and external, every night. Additional light power has also been added to the parking lot. The unarmed security guard works as a deterrent against trouble. Mr. Adwin, the designer for the future studio, stated that the Karaoke machines do not have the capability to play a video tape, as indicated by Mr. Arlington. This particular machine uses compact discs. In regards to the minimum window area requirement, he stated that most music studios use 216" x 3' windows. If the window is too large, November 23, 1992 Page 9 the people in the studios will not have the privacy that they prefer. Chair/Flamenbaum asked if it would be feasible to require a glass door along with the 216" x 3' window. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing closed. C/Meyer noted that since the door assembly would have to be fire rated, putting glass in the door may create a further problem and expense to the applicant. C/Grothe suggested that requirement be changed to shall have 10% of the floor 21611 x 3 ' . the minimum window require that each room area, but not less than CDD/DeStefano pointed out that the whole concept of the minimum window area condition comes from the experiences of other local police departments, as well as the review by our own sheriff department. It is recommended that the minimum window area not be anything less than 20%, to allow the public safety officers to be able to see inside the unit in an unobstructed manner. C/Meyer suggested that condition #5 clearly state that the window is to be unobstructed, and that there is to be no window coverings. CDD/DeStefano stated that condition #5 will be changed to indicate that, "All window into the studio must be non -tinted, transparent, unobstructed, and unimpaired at all times, and there shall be no window coverings." C/Meyer made the following comments: condition #6 should simply indicate that the sign be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, not specifying minimum size of letters; condition #4 should remain with a 20% of the floor area; condition #8 should be changed to require a licensed uniform security guard from 10:00 p.m. to closing because most recreational facilities have security; condition #17 should indicate that all studios must be illuminated to the satisfaction of the Building Official; and there should be a condition that indicates that the rest room facilities, for each gender, be immediately accessible within the studio. November 23, 1992 Page 10 The Commission discussed the possibility of allowing the establishment to stay open to 4:00 a.m. with the proviso that a licensed uniform security guard be present 10:00 p.m. to closing. Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the lights be controlled from a central location, and have a second control for the studio itself. The Commission resumed discussion of the hours of operation. CDD/DeStefano confirmed that some Karaoke facilities do stay open past 12:00 a.m. but they are located in intense commercial areas, not in a neighborhood setting such as Colima and Lemon. Staff prefers to be conservative, since it is a new use, and indicate an earlier closing period rather than a later one that may have to be scaled back. Perhaps a security guard approved by our local Sheriff Department would suffice as a deterrent to problems that may arise at 2:00 a.m.. Chair/Flamenbaum inquired if the applicant would be amenable to changing the hours to close at 2:00 a.m. during the week, and 4:00 a.m. on weekends, with the proviso that two uniform security guards be present externally, and one internally, between the hours of 12:00 a.m. to closing. Mr. Lee stated that it would be a great expense to him to have those uniformed security guards, especially since he has not opened his business yet. He would prefer that the Commission allow him to stay open until 2:00 a.m. during the entire week, but without a security guard. C/Meyer pointed out that most recreational facilities, that have crowd control, use uniformed security personnel. It is a benefit to the neighborhood, and to the people that would utilize this service. He recommended that one security guard be required from 10:00 p.m to 2:00 a.m. Greg Kirkly pointed out that the same concerns, regarding large outdoor parties, were expressed when the billiard room was proposed, yet none of those concerns materialized. C/Meyer stated that newspaper articles, such as the ones attached to the staff report, indicate that there is a problem, as does the police department. The security guard protects both the public and the neighborhood. As a compromise, if the owner wants November 23, 1992 Page it to stay open till 4:00 a.m., he must provide a security guard. Greg Kirkly requested that, if there is to be a compromise, the Commission allow the applicant to stay open until 12:00 a.m. without a security guard, to make it economical up to that point in time. Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the applicant be allowed to stay open from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., Sunday through Thursday, without a security guard, and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., with one uniformed security guard from 12:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Motion was made by C/Grothe and seconded by VC/MacBride to approve the project, with the conditions as modified: condition #4 - 20% of the floor area is to be window area, and excluding the door; condition #5 - to add "and there shall be no window coverings"; condition #6 - a sign that is approved by the Planning Department; condition #8 - hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., without a security guard, Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday, with one uniformed licensed security guard from 12:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; condition #17 - lighting to meet the requirements of the Building Official; and a condition that two rest room facilities shall be provided within the confines of this total use, and such facilities shall be assessable from inside the studio. Mr. Lee inquired if the Commission would reconsider the hours of operation to allow him to stay open till 4:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday, with one outside uniformed security guard. C/Meyer offered a substitute Motion, changing the hours of operation, condition #g, to be 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday, with one uniformed security guard in the parking area from 12:00 a.m to 2:00 a.m., and 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m Friday and Saturday, with one uniformed security guard in the parking area 12:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., or 11:00 a.m to 12:00 a.m. Sunday through Saturday without a security guard. C/Meyer's substitute Motion died for lack of a second. The Commission voted upon the Motion presented by C/Grothe. The Motion CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. November 23, 1992 Page 12 INFORMATIONAL ICE/Wentz reported that the State statute requires Transportation ITEMS: that the City of Diamond Bar adopt a Demand Management Plan (TDM) to reduce trips and to Draft take travel demand measures that will help reduce Transportation Transportation those trips. The Los Angeles County has a model ordinance Demand ManagementCommission (LACTC) prepared the input from a number of local ordinance based on jurisdiction. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance, which substantially complies with the model ordinance, to recommend to the City Council. The deadline for adoption of a local TDM is April 3, 1993, however, there are some benefits in having an ordinance introduced before the end of this calendar year. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and comment on the attached draft TDM Ordinance. VC/MacBride made the following comments: he questioned the use of the term "builder", as used in item F & G, page 4, and suggested that the term "project" would be more beneficial; there is a lot of State regulations put on the City and the employer, as indicated on page 14, City Audit, and Compliance Inspection; this document is not intended to make it easier for employers to do business in California, but just the opposite under the guise of assisting the transportation program; and the document is weighted in bureaucratic regulations, rather than recognition that California needs streamlining of it's procedures to get things accomplished. ICE/Wentz stated that some of the language, in terms of some of the requirements placed upon a particular project or developer, could be amended within reason. Part of the intent of the audit was the City's mechanism to assure that they are fulfilling the intent of the plan proposed to be implement for the City. Chair/Flamenbaum, noting that the term "employer" has not been defined, questioned who would be responsible for reporting if a retail space is to consist of office suites. ICE/Wentz explained that the developer would need to present the proposed plan to the City that would be acceptable. If it is to be office suites, he would need to submit a plan that would be in general compliance with the intent of this ordinance. The owner would be the responsible party for sharing that information that is transmitted, or if it would be those individual businesses. November 23, 1992 Page 13 Chair/Flamenbaum expressed the following concerns: the document specifies that "No business licenses shall be renewed", yet there are no business licenses in Diamond Bar; an "employer" is not defined; and there is no provision to cover a series of little shops. He suggested that condition be put in as a lease requirement, that their CC&R's shall include a provision for Congestion Management, of employers of a yet to be specified number of employees. The document should be written to apply to the City. C/Meyer suggested that some sort of an incentive program would be more effective than penalizing an operation that does not have a CMP. Businesses are probably leaving California because of all the reporting that is mandated. Perhaps the document should remain "loose" to allow an avenue for escape. The concept is good, but some of it is too restrictive, and most items could be accomplished through the development review process. ICE/Wentz explained that anything in the document can be amended, as long as it is ultimately accepted by the State by April of 1993. Some of the guidelines were already adopted by LACTC, agreed to by the AQMD, and defined and identified in the EIR. Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the wording be changed to state, "Non residential development of single employer usage of 25,000 square feet, and 50,000 square feet, and so forth.", so that multi suite commercial development would be exempt. C/Grothe suggested that there also be a minimum quantity of employees as well. C/Meyer inquired if both definitions, building area of single employer, plus a number of employees, could be added. ICE/Wentz stated that the employee concept could be added in. If the intent of the Commission is to "loosen" particularly the monitoring and the enforcement elements of this document, then staff will further review those sections and see what can be done to amend them to fit the spirit of the Commission's intent. C/Meyer suggested that the document be more realistically written. Our basic land use policy is contrary to a TDM program. November 23, 1992 Page 14 ICE/Wentz suggested that a sentence, "The City will identify the reporting requirements for each project as it is approved to assure that it meets the intent of the City's requirements as their projects developed.", be added to the monitoring section. VC/MacBride stated that he is discouraged by all of the requirements. This memorandum is trying to mandate, when we should be trying to encourage. The document should be made more flexible. Chair/Flamenbaum stated that he would like the term, or the South Coast Air Quality Management District, when appropriate, may take the following action", deleted under Enforcement Actions, because it is not appropriate in a City Ordinance. C/Meyer questioned the City's authority since business licenses are a revenue producer and not a regulatory permit. VC/MacBride suggested that a statement be included, to page 3 of the document, that indicates that the City of Diamond Bar is concerned that all of the visible means of achieving the desirable ends seem to be of a monitoring, auditing, and punitive measure. The City is going to attempt to explore every possibility of encouraging compliance, and stimulating a recognition of the problem, within the means available to us. Chair/Flamenbaum, referring to page 17, item 4.b., suggested that the statement, "plus accrued interest", be added to the second sentence following " ..refund to the appellant all deposits,...". Furthermore, if the City loses, then it should also pay those costs. ICE/Wentz noted that the Enforcement Fees section is language that was garnered from several other programs, and can probably be amended. Chair/Flamenbaum also suggested that, since the City Manager has a vested interest in this, the City Manager should not be the person conducting the hearing, but rather a neutral arbitrator. ANNOUNCEMENTS: CDD/DeStefano reported on the following: no Director's actions to report as no Administrative Development Review held tonight; staff received copies of the EIR for the hospital project, and the Commission will receive copies soon; the draft EIR for the South Pointe project should be available November 23, 1992 Page 15 around November 30, 1992; and there is a copy of The City Business Retention Plan included in the Commission's packet. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by Chair/ Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to'adjourn at 11:20 p.m. Respectively, /s/ James DeStefano James DeStefano Secretary Attest: /s/ Bruce Flamenbaum Bruce Flamenbaum Chairman C=TY Or 52ARarrn AAA MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SITE TOUR MASTER PLAN SITE TOUR DECEMBER 14, 1992 CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairman MacBride called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m. at the City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Meyer, Li and Vice Chairman MacBride. Also present were Community Development Director James DeStefano, City Planning Consultant Hardy Strozier, City Environmental Consultant Peter Lewandowski. STUDY TOUR VC/MacBride announced the purpose and intent of the tour and provided directions to the first viewing location. VC/MacBride recessed the tour/meeting at approximately 2:15 p.m. and reconvened the tour/meeting at approximately 2:25 at the rear parking lot of the Avery Dennison Building located at 20955 Pathfinder Road. Mr. Strozier provided a brief overview of the tour and briefly described the project location and proposed uses as seen from the parking lot. VC/MacBride recessed the tour/meeting to the terminus of Rapid View Drive to begin a walking tour of the Arciero and RNP property. Mr. Lewandowski provided an overview of the EIR prior to the tour of the property. CDD/DeStefano pointed out that Peter Lewandowsky is with the firm of Ultrasystems. Ultrasystems is an independent contractor that the City hired to create the Environmental Impact Report that analyzes the potential impacts of the proposed project. Lewandowski pointed out that they would be walking in the bottom of the canyon which is identified as Sandstone Canyon in the EIR. The perspective will be a rather focused one and pointed out that this only represents a portion of the 171 acres. He also pointed out an area not contiguous with the project site, that is an open space area identified as Homeowners Association Open Space which will be left in a preserved condition. December 14, 1992 Page 2 Similarly, on the other side of Shaded Wood, there is also another Homeowners Association Open Space Area. The intent of this tour is to give people a focused perspective of the canyon. A Water course was pointed out that at one time commenced on the other side of Pathfinder Rd. With the previous development of the Office Building and Water Tanks, the tributary has been impacted, and in Ultrasystem's opinion, the water that is now being seen is primarily urban runoff, as opposed to a stream -fed canyon. Lewandowski introduced Jim Harrison who is qualified to respond to questions about the biology on the site. Harrison pointed out many plant species and Oak trees in the area. Lewandowski mentioned that the EIR was on file at the City Hall and Library for the public's review. He also pointed out that in the second chapter of the EIR is a 25 page condensed version of all the analyses of the existing setting, impacts and mitigation measures which he recommended reading as a summary of the document. Harrison also pointed out that a number of technical studies were utilized to derive the information in the EIR. These studies in two volumes are on file at the City of Diamond Bar. END OF TOUR: Upon completion of the tour CDD/DeStefano announced the Study Session would convene at approximately 5:30 at South Coast Air Quality Management District Building in room CC -3. VC/MacBride adjourned the tour at approximately 4:15 p.m. Respectively, /s/ James DeStefano James DeStefano Secretary QITV or 52AHaus BAR MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION DECEMBER 14, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Flamenbaum called the meeting to order at 5:30± p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District Building, Room CC -3, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Meyer, Grothe, Li, Vice Chairman MacBride, and Chairman Flamenbaum. Also present were Community Development Director James DeStefano, Associate Planner Robert Searcy, Planning Technician Ann Lungu, Interim City Engineer George Wentz, and Contract Secretary Liz Myers. STUDY SESSION: CDD/DeStefano introduced Hardy Strozier and Peter Lewendowski. Hardy Strozier, from the Planning South Pointe Associates, is retained by the City as a General Master Plan Consultant and overall Project Manager to assist the City in processing this project. Peter Lewendowski, from Ultra Systems, an Environmental Consultant Firm that is the independent environmental consultants retained by the City to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR), will address the potential impacts of the proposed project. CDD/DeStefano stated that the project, known as the South Pointe Master Plan, is generally located west of Brea Canyon Road, north of Pathfinder, east of Morning Sun Drive, and south of Rapid View Drive. The proposal is to develop 171 acres incorporating the following variety of land uses: a permanent middle school located on 30 acres; a 30 acre mix use commercial site off of Brea Canyon Road; approximately 95 homes located on Brea Canyon Road just south of the pump station; and approximately 110 homes in two separate developments generally east of Morning Sun Drive. The reason for the meeting tonight is to introduce the Planning Commission to the draft EIR, and to provide an overview of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. The public comment period for the EIR ends on January 18, 1992, and there are two Planning Commission public hearings scheduled on January 11 & 25, 1993. Hardy Strozier stated that, earlier in the afternoon, staff, consultants, the majority of the Planning Commission, and some members of the public, went to the 171 acre project site in order to get a comprehensive review of the site. The project represents 5 different interests: the Walnut Valley Unified School District (WVUSD), the City, Arciero & Sons Development, RnP Development, and Sasik Corporation. At the request of Councilmember Papen, copies of the Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, a brief summary December 14, 1992 Page 2 found in the EIR, has been provided. There is also a binder available at City Hall that contains all the background technical documents that formed the foundation for the draft EIR. He outlined the following 6 important project benefits that the City will gain from the proposed 171 acre project: a 20 acre park site, of which 10 acres will be flat usable park land; a 31 acre commercial office site, of which the City will gain 1/2 of the 31 acres for their own future financial inventory of revenue; at project build -out, there should be 465 new jobs created in the City; the completion of South Pointe Middle School, as well as the removal of 400,000 cubic yards of dirt; greatly improved road access to the South Pointe Middle School, which will reduce traffic on existing Larkstone; and significant roadway and signalization improvements off site and approximate to this project site. CDD/DeStefano reported that the project came before the City approximately a year ago as independent interests, and the City merged these separate interests into one master planned area for the overall community benefit. He explained that Mr. Armed Patel, one of the developers, has a company called Sasik Corporation, and that the names are often interchanged. Also, Mr. Jan Dabney, the Engineer for RnP Development, also works very closely with, and often speaks for both Mr. Arciero, and/or Mr. Patel. Peter Lewendowski explained that Ultra Systems was selected, as part of a competitive process, by the City to act as an independent third party consultant to assess the environmental impacts associated with the proposed South Pointe Master Plan project. The objective of today's presentation is to provide a brief overview of the CEQA process, to present the EIR and the findings presented therein, to answer specific questions the Commission may have, and to receive any public testimony that the Commission may wish to receive on the EIR. He recommended that any public comments received tonight be accepted into public record, but that a formal response be given at a later date after individual consultants have had an opportunity to review those comments made. Chair/Flamenbaum recessed the meeting at 6:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 6:10 p.m. in the AQMD Auditorium. Peter Lewendowski, continuing with his presentation, explained that CEQA was designed to December 14, 1992 Page 3 establish some environmental policies for the State of California. All projects that are undergoing discretionary actions are subject to review in accordance to the CEQA, and the resulting State CEQA guidelines. The City of Diamond Bar is identified as the lead agency, and will have the primary discretionary action in reviewing this project. The other agencies identified, in the environmental analysis, as responsible agencies that may also be issuing permits or approvals, are the WVUSD, the Walnut Valley Water District, the Army Corps of Engineers, the California Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. CEQA requires that significant environmental impacts, which deal with substantial adverse changes in the physical environment, be focused upon. The decision as to what constitutes a significant impact is based upon reasoned judgment on the part of the local decision makers. Ultra Systems was selected to prepare the EIR as an impartial third party observer to the project, ensuring a full disclosure of an environmental impact associated with the development of the South Pointe Master Plan site. The prepared draft EIR, which is available for public review, is an informational document only and not a policy document. It contains Ultra Systems professional judgment of the impacts associated with the project, and contains a set of mitigation measures designed to minimize, or avoid the impacts identified, as well as identifying project alternatives which, if implemented, might reduce, avoid, or minimize some of the impacts defined. The EIR serves as a problem solving device through the identification of mitigation measures and project alternatives. It provides a vehicle to assure a full open dialogue on a projects potential impacts, and provides a vehicle for public participation. The City will be soliciting oral and written comments on the findings of the EIR between now and January 18, 1993. The public is encouraged to submit letters to the City, and those comments will be included into a document called The Response to Comment Document, which is part of the EIR. The EIR is an informational tool only, and the City can elect to implement the mitigation measures, elect to adopt the project alternatives, or elect to take other actions not fully disclosed in the EIR. Peter Lewendowski then presented a brief overview of the CEQA process. The process starts with a submission of a formal application for discretionary action. Upon submittal of those December 14, 1992 Page 4 tentative maps, in conjunction with the Master Plan and other discretionary approvals, the City prepared an initial study, or preliminary assessment, of the project, identifying potential environmental impacts to determine if an EIR should be prepared. The City concluded that the implementation of the project has the potential to produce significant unavoidable adverse impacts, thereby necessitating the preparation of an EIR. The City has published a Notice of Preparation informing public agencies of the City's election to prepare an EIR, and soliciting comments from government agencies and special districts. Those comments have been included in the technical appendix section of the EIR. Ultra Systems has prepared the draft EIR based upon the initial study, our independent analysis, the comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation, our field inspections of the property, and on the work by other subconsultants. CEQA does not require that a public hearing be . scheduled, however, it does encourage full open disclosure information. Upon completion of the public hearing process before the Planning Commission, a document, identified as a Response to Comments, is produced, providing a technical, detailed response to all the issues that have been raised on the draft EIR by the Planning Commission, the City Council, by government agencies reviewing the document, and by the citizenry who have full opportunity to review and comment upon that document. The final EIR will also include, as either part of the approval or denial of the project, Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. In reviewing the project, there are other considerations, balanced against the projects potential impacts, that the City may wish to address, such as employment opportunities, and revenue generation. Mitigation measures, which are ultimately adopted by the City as conditions of approval, are incorporated into a document called The Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program. It ensures that the conditions of approval identified are in fact incorporated into the project either through project design changes, enforcement during construction, or enforcement after project construction. Peter Lewendowski then reviewed the conclusions reached, as presented in the draft EIR. Based upon the initial study, an assessment of a number of technical issues were reviewed which included earth resources, hydrology, land use issues, biology, traffic, circulation, public services and December 14, 1992 Page 5 utilities, aesthetics, growth inducing impacts, and project alternatives. It was determined that the implementation of the South Pointe Project, as presented, will result in the creation of two significant adverse impacts: the air quality impacts during project construction activities will result in exceeding established SEAQMD standards for nitric oxide, and the project, in combination with other development activities which have been identified in the project area, will result in cumulative air quality impacts which will result in exceeding SEAQMD standards for a number of other criteria pollutants; and based upon the findings of an independent traffic study, it has been concluded that, although the project itself will not produce significant impacts upon the areas roadways, the project, in combination with other development activities, will result in exceeding established level of service standards at six intersections. Though other impacts have been identified, they have not been determined to be significant impacts. The removal of 92% of the 835 oak trees identified, in project implementation, is not a significant impact because compliance with the Oak Tree Ordinance, which clearly identifies a mitigation measure of a 2:1 replacement ratio, will fully mitigate all impacts to existing oak tree resources. The project implementation will also result in substantial grading of the project site, and convert a rural piece of property to a developed use. However, based upon the City's General Plan, and existing State and County policies, there is no rationale to conclude that the development of the urbanite site itself is a significant impact. There are different standards of beauty, and we are unable to document any evidence, any public policy, which would conclude for significance for aesthetic impacts. Furthermore, the conversion of this undeveloped site to an urban use will result in the removal of existing vegetation and the loss of habitat areas to those animal species which now inhabit the site. However, based upon detailed biologic surveys, we have not found any plant or animal species on site which are legally protected either by State or Federal statute, and there is no public policy in the City indicating that the loss of habitat area constitutes a significant impact. Also, the project development will result in the introduction of additional students to the area schools. However, the school district has indicated that the schools can accommodate the growth projected by the project. Project development will increase demands upon police services and fire services. However, December 14, 1992 Page 6 those resource agencies have not identified significant adverse impacts. Peter Lewendowski then concluded his presentation by reviewing the alternatives identified in the EIR: No Project - either identified as the site's ultimate preservation as an open space parcel, or developed in accordance to the existing zoning standards; the development of a similar project intensity but with a cluster development concept; different lot configurations proposed for the various tentative maps; the absence of the Sasik project from the ultimate project site; and an analysis of just the Sasik project in terms of it's ultimate development. C/Meyer requested further elaboration on the analysis and the requirements of CEQA, and alternative land uses of the site. Peter Lewendowski explained that CEQA requires that, in addition to the project, a reasonable range of alternatives be identified that are designed to minimize, avoid, or mitigate the impacts identified in the project. Six separate project alternatives have been analyzed, and are designed to provide a comparative analysis, relative to the impacts produced by the proposed project. He then reviewed each of the project alternatives, as presented in the draft EIR, as well as the impacts and mitigation measures identified. Hardy Strozier explained that, as one of the alternative project, RnP and Sasik clustered their developments to minimize the intrusion into the woodland area, the Arciero property clustered apartments or townhouses on the ridge necessitating extensive use of retaining walls, to stay out of that canyon area, and the future commercial site was reduced from 31 acres to 3 acres. The net effect of this alternative is almost an 80% preservation of this Sandstone Canyon area and it's tributaries. Hardy Strozier also explained that when the three developers, Arciero, RnP, and Sasik, originally made applications, Sasik was combined with the RnP tract. when the environmental documentation was about 80% complete, Mr. Patel indicated that he would like to file a separate tract map from RnP. For purposes of environmental analysis, it was decided to place the separate tract map, as an alternative to the draft EIR. The tract map was December 14, 1992 Page 7 then evaluated, and three separate alternatives, to Sasik Corporations newly submitted tract map, was developed. Peter Lewendowski reiterated that the draft EIR document is not a policy document, but an informational document for the City's consideration to balance the projects environmental impacts with other considerations. C/Meyer requested that more information be provided as to how it was concluded that going from a rural, or a non urbanized use, to urbanized uses is a non significant impact. Chair/Flamenbaum, concurring with C/Meyer's request, suggested that the consultants review the General Plan Land Use section 1.2.4 on page I-11, and section 3.3, on page I-19, and Resource Management section 1.1 and 1.2, on page III -8, in conjunction to their response. C/Meyer inquired how far the radius review is in analyzing traffic impacts on intersections and existing facilities. Peter Lewendowski stated that there is no formal standard required by statute. Traditionally, we look at something within a one mile radius, believing that projects within that area, in conjunction with the proposed action, may cumulatively impact a project. We met with the various planning departments, or traffic engineering departments, of the adjoining cities, and ask them of currently proposed projects. Based upon the inventory of projects which are developed through that interview process, we develop an inventory of related project activities. Information is also obtained from CalTrans. The level of service, after the project, would be different at various intersections and different by a.m. or p.m. peak period, as noted on the table on page IV -96. C/Li requested information regarding the exact dollar amount for future fiscal benefits to the City. He inquired how it was determined that 465 jobs would be created. Peter Lewendowski explained that the employment projections were based upon industry standards for commercial and/or office uses, based upon the U.S. Department of Transportation which assumed generation factors of 4 employees per 1,000 square December 14, 1992 Page S feet for non residential uses. We multiplied the number of non residential square foot proposed on site, or ultimately developed on site, times that factor to produce the employment generation ratio. C/Li requested further elaboration as to why the off site analysis resulted in one conclusion while the on site analysis resulted in a separate conclusion. Peter Lewendowski explained that the development of additional collector roads on the project site, primarily connecting Morning Sun and Brea Canyon Road, enhances internal circulation impacts. However, the external circulation to the South Pointe project, in combination with other projects, further impacted arterial roadways in proximity. C/Grothe inquired if other vegetation or trees have been quantified, beside oak trees. Peter Lewendowski explained that only the oak trees were quantified because the City's Oak Tree Ordinance directs us to identify and mitigate the loss of that one tree species. However, the acreage for each of the 7 vegetation species identified on site were quantified. C/Grothe stated that, it seem uncomprehendable, to indicate that the removal of 835 trees, with their various range in sizes, are not significant, even with a 2:1 replacement ratio. He then requested that an alternative project be considered that eliminates one of the major residential developments. VC/MacBride requested that there be more information on the relationship of this total South Pointe project to other possible developments, or potentials for development, so as to get a feeling of what's happening beyond the confines of this particular mass proposal. Chair/Flamenbaum requested that the report also include discussion regarding the impacts of moving the dirt both within the project area and off the project area. He also requested information regarding the impacts of any increase in noise to both the surrounding community, and remaining wildlife in the area. VC/MacBride requested a cross section analysis to illustrate the proportion of density of the impact of the fill upon the canyon. December 14, 1992 Page 9 CDD/DeStefano stated that various members of the City staff are available to the public to answer any questions, and to provide documents, or details needed to further understand the project. The public review period runs through January 18, 1993. The Planning Commission public hearings are scheduled for the January 11 & 25, 1993. This is the first opportunity the City has had to Master Plan a variety of interests on a remaining piece of property within our community, to the maximum benefits to the community as a whole. The project in the EIR is not necessarily the project that is going to be approved, denied, or modified, but rather it is only the project that has been presented by the development team at this point. RECESS: Chair/Flamenbaum recessed the study session meeting at 7:06 p.m. to be reconvened to the Regular Planning Commission meeting. Respectively, /s/ James DeStefano James DeStefano Secretary Attest: /s/ Bruce Flamenbaum Bruce Flamenbaum Chairman CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Li will be abstaining from voting on the Minutes of November 23, 1992 because he was not present Minutes of during that meeting. Nov. 23, 1992 Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/MacBride and CARRIED to approve the Minutes of November 23, 1992, as presented. C/Li abstained. NEW BUSINESS: PT/Lungu presented the staff report regarding a request, made by the applicant Avery Label, to Planned Sign develop a Planned Sign Program to install a Prog. No. 92-5 freestanding monument sign six (6) feet in height, with a sign face area of 24.38 square feet, and a directional sign five (5) feet in height, with a sign face area of six (6) square feet, for a professional office building located at 20955 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar. Avery Dennison is the only tenant that occupies the building. The Sign Ordinance requires that monument signs have Planning Commission review and approval. PT/Lungu reviewed the application analysis as presented in the staff report. Staff feels that the monument sign as proposed is appropriate for the site, and complies with the Sign Ordinance, but that the directional sign may need to be modified to meet the intent of the Sign Ordinance. The Engineering Department, upon their review, has advised that the directional sign be moved approximately 36 feet to the west of the eastern property line. Also, it was advised that the directional sign be subject to removal if it becomes a safety hazard. It is recommended that the Commission approve Planned Sign Program No. 92-5, Findings of Fact, and CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 14, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Flamenbaum called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by ALLEGIANCE: Chairman Flamenbaum. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Meyer, Grothe, Li, Vice Chairman MacBride, and Chairman Flamenbaum. Also present were Community Development Director James DeStefano, Associate Planner Robert Searcy, Planning Technician Ann Lungu, Interim City Engineer George Wentz, Deputy City Attorney Craig Fox, and Contract Secretary Liz Myers. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Li will be abstaining from voting on the Minutes of November 23, 1992 because he was not present Minutes of during that meeting. Nov. 23, 1992 Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/MacBride and CARRIED to approve the Minutes of November 23, 1992, as presented. C/Li abstained. NEW BUSINESS: PT/Lungu presented the staff report regarding a request, made by the applicant Avery Label, to Planned Sign develop a Planned Sign Program to install a Prog. No. 92-5 freestanding monument sign six (6) feet in height, with a sign face area of 24.38 square feet, and a directional sign five (5) feet in height, with a sign face area of six (6) square feet, for a professional office building located at 20955 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar. Avery Dennison is the only tenant that occupies the building. The Sign Ordinance requires that monument signs have Planning Commission review and approval. PT/Lungu reviewed the application analysis as presented in the staff report. Staff feels that the monument sign as proposed is appropriate for the site, and complies with the Sign Ordinance, but that the directional sign may need to be modified to meet the intent of the Sign Ordinance. The Engineering Department, upon their review, has advised that the directional sign be moved approximately 36 feet to the west of the eastern property line. Also, it was advised that the directional sign be subject to removal if it becomes a safety hazard. It is recommended that the Commission approve Planned Sign Program No. 92-5, Findings of Fact, and December 14, 1992 Page 2 conditions as listed within the attached resolution. C/Grothe stated that it was his understanding that the Sign Ordinance requires that a Planned Sign Program be designed for the entire commercial center, not a single parcel. This application is being called a Planned Sign Program, however, it has no resemblance to a Planned Sign Program as defined to our Sign Ordinance. PT/Lungu explained that, according to the Sign Ordinance, a multi -use center, or building, requires a Planned Sign Program for the monument sign. The directional sign is included in the application because the sign code is vague as to the definition of a directional sign. C/Grothe indicated that the Planned Sign Program was to have a uniform program for the entire center to avoid having multiple signs by various owners in the center. If this application is a Planned Sign Program, then a full sign plan needs to be done for the entire project. Furthermore, monument signs are limited to centers on street sides, not to individual building owners. PT/Lungu, in response to C/Meyer, stated that the applicant is in concurrence with moving the directional sign as directed by the Engineering Department. C/Meyer stated that, since the building is not clearly visible to the motoring public, it seems like a reasonable request to advertise the location of the building at the directional sign. He inquired if there was a way that the applicant could do so without some sort of a variance. PT/Lungu stated that the sign code does not specifically state that the logo can or cannot be on the directional sign. It is staff's recommendation that the logo be removed. Rudy Arcos, from Cole Signs, 12335 South Alec, Anaheim, stated that the applicant is in concurrence with staff's recommendation of approval. The owner would rather have the logo on December 14, 1992 page 3 the directional sign, however, they would remove it if the Commission so directs. Chair/Flamenbaum suggested that the item be tabled, pending the return of the Community Development Director, so that he can resolve C/Grothe's concern regarding the definition of the Planned Sign Program. The Commission concurred. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PT/Lungu presented the staff report regarding the request, made by the applicant Corner Stone Tentative Parcel Partners Walnut, Ltd., to subdivide one parcel into Map No. 23629 10 lots for the purpose of commercial condominiums, located at 20418 Walnut Drive within an existing business park identified as the Walnut Business Center. Staff recommended that this project be continued until January 11, 1993 to allow the Engineering Department more time to review the proposed map. C/Meyer, concerned with the time constraint on a parcel map, inquired if the applicant has given his concurrence to the continuance. PT/Lungu stated that the applicant has been informed of the recommendation for continuance, and they have verbally agreed to it. They would prefer that the application come before the Planning Commission as soon as possible. AP/Searcy noted that, with the absence of some of the information that has been submitted, the project had never been deemed complete. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing opened. Hearing no testimony, Chair/Flamenbaum declared the public hearing continued. Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Grothe and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the item to the meeting of January 11, 1993. Variance No. 92-3 PT/Lungu presented the staff report regarding the & Planned Sign request, made by the applicant Steve Porretta, to program No. 92-4 develop a Planned Sign Program for an existing retail shopping professional center located at 325- December 14, 1992 Page 4 379 S. South Diamond Bar Blvd. and 23341-23499 E. Golden Springs Drive. The applicant is also requesting a variance to install six freestanding monument signs each 15 feet in height with a sign face area of 90 square feet to replace existing freestanding monument signs. Staff recommended that this project be continued until January 11, 1993 to allow the Engineering Department time to review for the Variance. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the public hearing opened. Hearing no testimony, Chair/Flamenbaum declared the public hearing continued. The Commission concurred that an additional Planning Commission meeting was necessary, on January 18, 1993, due to the numerous items scheduled during the month of January, 1993. C/Meyer requested that the staff's analysis include some comparative information regarding the existing signs for commercial development on Diamond Bar Blvd., in and around Grand Ave., as it relates to this project. Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the item to the meeting of January 18, 1993. Chair/Flamenbaum recessed the meeting at 7:49 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:00 p.m. NEW BUSINESS: Chair/Flamenbaum requested staff to respond to C/Grothe's concern regarding the interpretation of Planned Sign the Planned Sign Program in the Sign Ordinance. Prog. No. 92-5 CDD/DeStefano explained that a freestanding monument sign requires approval of the Planning Commission under the category entitled Planned Sign Program within the Sign Ordinance. Planned Sign Program implies a broader usage of signs, looking at the entirety of the sign package. However, the ordinance does require, that a "single" freestanding sign be approved by Planning Commission as well. December 14, 1992 Page 5 C/Meyer noted that the proposed signs meet the constraints of the site, and that it seems to be a reasonable approach to advertising the tenants of the site. DCA/Fox amended the resolution on page 3, item 4(e) to delete the word "is". Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the resolution, eliminating condition 5(c), and adding the finding that, given the location of the building and it's visibility from the street, the sign program and a monument sign near the street is appropriate, and that the sign be reduced to 24 square feet, and to include the amendment to the Resolution as indicated by DCA/Fox. PUBLIC HEARING: AP/Searcy presented the staff report regarding the request, made by the applicant Diamond Development Vesting Tentative Company, for a 34 unit condominium subdivision on a Tract No. 50519, 2.33 acre site located northeast of the corner of DR No. 91-2, Golden Springs Dr. and Torito Lane, 23575 Golden ZCA No. 91-3, & Springs. Additionally, the applicant requests DA No. 91-3 architectural and site plan review for the townhouse development, a Zone Change from C-1 (Restrictive Business Zone) to R-3 (Limited Multiple Resident Zone) and to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. AP/Searcy reviewed the application analysis, as presented in the staff report. He reported that staff has reviewed this project in comparison with comments made from previous public hearings, and it is staff opinion that the project, as submitted, is an improvement over the evolution of the whole project. It is requested that the Commission open the public hearing, receive comments, and direct staff to prepare resolutions as appropriate. C/Meyer inquired if the Development Review application is the same application filed almost two years ago. He also inquired why the measurements on the site plan do not reconcile with the vesting tentative map. AP/Searcy confirmed that the application is the same, but new fees have been paid to the City to process the revised application. There were December 14, 1992 Page 6 changes made in response to Fire Department requirements, and therefore, the tract map, as dated in November of 1992, is more accurate than the site plan. They will need to be brought in to conformance with each other for the approval. C/Grothe inquired if the Commission's packet includes the Planning Departments draft conditions of approval. AP/Searcy explained that the Engineering Departments draft conditions of approval are included in the packet, however, staff has not include Planning Department conditions of approval until staff receives direction from the Commission as to whether this project is in compliance with what the Commission is looking for. Chair/Flamenbaum declared the public hearing opened. Dr. Crowley, the applicant, pointed out the following changes incorporated into the plan, pursuant to the Commission's suggestions at the last public hearing on this item: there has been a reduction to 34 units in order to be able to accommodate a loop type driveway around the entire project; the entrances to the building has been reoriented so that they face on to a court yard wherever possible; the architectural style has been changed to a semi mediterranean look with stucco and s -tile roofs; private patios have been added to each of the units, enclosed by a 4 foot high color coordinated wall that will separate them from the rest of the common area; landscaping adjacent to each of the garages have been added; trash enclosures have been incorporated within the design; visitor parking as been doubled the code requirement; the visitor parking throughout the site has been reallocated; the units are still 1300 square feet; and the amenities remain the same. From the various studies requested by the Commission, we have found that there is a significant need in the City for this type of housing, that the sewer is more than adequate to accommodate this unit, and that this project will only increase traffic flow along Torito Lane by 1.2%. We have concurred with the recommendations December 14, 1992 Page 7 of the Engineering Department to repave Torito Lane, and to contribute $12,500 dollars towards additional signal phasing requirements at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Golden Springs Road. However, we feel that the request made, by the Director of Facilities Planning for the Pomona Unified School District, that as a condition of approval we be required to pay $254,457 to the District to help mitigate the cost of adding new students (which amounts to $7,484 per unit, or $5.73 per square foot fee) is unprecedented, unreasonable, and overly burdensome. Chair/Flamenbaum asked DCA/Fox if, the City could impose such a potential development fee that we have no control over. DCA/Fox explained that such an issue is generally dealt with between the school district and the applicant. The City can consider a reasonable condition that the applicant satisfy the mitigation measures identified by the school district. CDD/DeStefano pointed out that the developer will need to satisfy the school district, regardless of the fee assessed. When the project is ready for conditions by the Planning Commission, it will simply state that the developer needs to fulfill his obligation with this agency as well as any other public agencies. Dr. Crowley stated that he concurred with the recommended conditions, except for item #36, of the Engineering report, which is not consistent with what he was told earlier. ICE Wentz explained that item #36, in the Engineering report, is related to the contribution of $120,000 towards signalization at the intersection of Golden Springs and Torito Lane. The supplemental report, provided this evening by the applicant, relating to site distances and the merits for a signal, indicates that the need for a signal is borderline, and the installations of medians may be a feasible alternative to restrict the left turn movements on to Torito from Golden Springs, and to prohibit left turn movements out of Torito on to Golden Springs. It is staff December 14, 1992 Page 8 suggestion that item #36 be amended to add, "...or, to construct medians on Golden Springs to restrict traffic movements at Golden Springs and Torito Lane as approved by the City Engineer." Chair/Flamenbaum declared the Public Hearing closed. DCA/Fox noted that there is a provision, dealing with City control over school fees, that indicates that the City cannot issue a building permit until the school has certified the payment of the fees. C/Grothe suggested that the applicant install garage door openers for each unit. AP/Searcy, in response to C/Meyer, stated that, if the concept of the project is appropriate, it is staff's recommendation that the Commission direct staff to develop the conditions of approval, and bring the resolutions back to the Commission at a later date. It is recommended that the project be continued to February of 1993. Chair/Flamenbaum, in regards to item #36, inquired if, as a result, people would use the other end of Torito Lane and go through the commercial center. ICE/Wentz concurred that if motorists can't make the turning movement at Torito, there may be other ways that they will try to make that move. Any condition would require the Engineering Departments approval regarding the egress and ingress on to Torito Lane. Chair/Flamenbaum, concerned with safety, suggested that the applicant be required to install adequate common area lighting along the driveway. C/Grothe suggested that the small planters, in the drive aisles by buildings 5 & 6, be omitted because they will obstruct traffic. C/Meyer made the following recommendations: the setback to the street right-of-way, in lot 34, should be at least a 5 foot minimum dimension; the walkway area between the patios, between building 3 and 4, should be increased if possible; and there December 14, 1992 page 9 should be more than one stairwell leading from Golden Springs to the project. Chair/Flamenbaum, concerned with runoff from torrential rain, suggested that there be a condition concerning drainage on the hill coming into building 1 and 2. ICE/Wentz stated that grading and drainage is a standard review. Roof draining systems could be required to control the runoff from the roofs of these buildings. Chair/ Flamenbaum. inquired if a condition could be considered, beyond UBC requirements, requiring the front doors to be wheel chair assessable, and that ramps be added wherever feasible. He also suggested that the draft CC&R's be included, and contain an arbitration clause. Motion was made by C/Grothe, seconded by C/Meyer and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the item to the February 8, 1993 meeting, and to direct staff to draft the conditions of approval, and the resolutions of approval for recommendation to the City Council. INFORMATIONAL CDD/DeStefano reported that he approved, under ITEMS: administrative development review authority, a 7,400 square foot home, on a lot located at 2920 Wagon Train Lane earlier this evening. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by VC/MacBride, seconded by Chair/ Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 p.m. Attest: /s/Bruce Flamenbaum Bruce Flamenbaum Chairman Respectively, /s/ James DeStefano James DeStefano Secretary CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA fiEPOBT AGFNnA Nn h TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS ON THE CITY'S BEHALF. SUMMARY: The Department of General Services, through the joint efforts of the California Energy Commission and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), is sponsoring a statewide purchasing program for fuel flexible vehicles (FFV). These vehicles, which are available in the Ford Taurus, the Chevrolet Lumina, the Dodge Spirit and the Plymouth Acclaim models, operate on both gasoline and methanol and are certified by the Air Resources Board as transitional low emission vehicles, having approximately 50% lower smog -forming emissions than their gasoline -powered equivalent. Through 1992, the state has helped place more than 2,000 methanol -powered vehicles on the road throughout California and plans to market as many as 7,000 factory -built alternatively fueled vehicles by the end of 1993. In addition to the cost savings that can be achieved through volume pricing, some of the more attractive incentives for purchasing these low emission vehicles under the statewide purchasing program include: financial incentives from the California Energy Commission; tax credits toward the purchase of the vehicle; full factory warranties on the vehicle; and, Regulation XV credit. The City has had an opportunity, through the Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Fleet Demonstration Program sponsored by the SCAQMD, to evaluate the Ford Taurus and Chevrolet Lumina methanol fuel flexible sedans. Based on the City's evaluation of these sedans, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to procure a Ford Taurus through the statewide purchasing program at a not -to -exceed cost of $13,000. Funding is available through the City's Air Quality Improvement Trust Fund which was created by the passage of Assembly Bill 2766 and provides the City about $33,000 a year in state subventions that can only be used on projects aimed at the reduction of air pollutants from mobile sources. Since the purchase of a low emission fuel flexible vehicle will result in a reduction of air pollutants, the purchase of a FFV would be an allowable project under this funding source. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 93 -XX authorizing the Department of General Services of the State of California to purchase fuel flexible vehicles (FFV) on the City's behalf. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the statewide purchasing program for fuel flexible vehicles (FFV). LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed R BY: Terr 3nce L. B (ager Troy L Bu zlaff City Manager AssistanN the City ana er by the City Attorney? X Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? MAJORITY 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A Yes No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? _ 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Yes X No R BY: Terr 3nce L. B (ager Troy L Bu zlaff City Manager AssistanN the City ana er RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS ON THE CITY'S BEHALF. A. Recitals. WHEREAS, fuel flexible vehicles (FFV) produce at least 30 percent, and in many cases as much as 50 percent, less smog forming emissions than their gasoline counterparts; and WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has expressed an interest in participating in a statewide purchasing program, jointly sponsored by the California Energy Commission and the South Coast Air Quality Management District, for fuel flexible vehicles (FFV); and WHEREAS, the Department of General Services of the State of California has been designated as the lead public agency to contract for volume discount pricing on fuel flexible vehicles (FFV) for the benefit of public agencies throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 6502 authorizes the City to participate jointly with other public agencies in such a program. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved, ordered, and determined, as follows: 1. The City's participation in the statewide pur- chasing program for fuel flexible vehicles (FFV) is hereby approved and joint participation is hereby authorized pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 6502. 2. Pursuant to Section 10324 of the California Public Contract Code, the City of Diamond Bar does hereby authorize and direct the Office of Procurement, Department of General Services of the State of California to execute purchase orders and documents on the City's behalf, and to perform such other acts and deeds as may be necessary or convenient to effect the purposes of this resolution and the City's participation in the statewide purchasing program for fuel flexible vehicles (FFV). 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby authorize the City's City Manager to sign and deliver all necessary requests and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of the City. 4. This resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this day of 1993. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1993, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ��-- AGENDA REPORT AGFNDA NO_`'� TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN. SUMMARY: Assembly Bill 939 requires the City to prepare, adopt, and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) which identifies how the City will divert, through a combination of source reduction, recycling, and composting programs, 25% of solid wastes from landfill disposal by 1995, and 501/6 by the year 2000. By law, the SRRE must contain several specific components including, but not limited to, a solid waste facility capacity component. The solid waste facility component must identify the current and future disposal capacity that will be needed to accommodate all of the solid waste that is generated within the City over a 15 -year period. If the City fails to show adequate capacity for its disposal needs, the State may reject the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and, after conducting a public hearing, may impose administrative civil penalties of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per day for failure to submit an adequate plan. Since the City of Diamond Bar does not currently have adequate disposal capacity to accommodate its waste disposal needs nor has it secured an export agreement with another jurisdiction or solid waste enterprise to provide guaranteed disposal capacity, the State may find the City's SRRE deficient and impose administrative penalties upon the City if this deficiency is not corrected. (Narrative Continued on Next Pagel RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 93 -XX supporting the Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Action Plan. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to send a letter requesting the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County to reaffirm their commitment to resolving the County's waste disposal crisis. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: _ Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? X Yes _ No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? MAJORITY 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? —Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REV EWED BY: �44� Terrence L. Belanger City Manager V1 Troy utzlaff Assist to the Cit Ma r As an alternative to securing an export agreement to guarantee disposal capacity at a duly permitted disposal facility, the City could adopt a resolution in support of tho County'o Solid Wuw Mjinipomant ACtinn No This plan, which was adopted by both the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County in 1988, establishes a comprehensive countywide strategy of managing solid waste and of providing 50 years of disposal capacity through a reasonable balance of public and private operations and solid waste disposal facilities, including: a regional public landfill system; implementation of residential and commercial recycling programs, composting programs, and a household hazardous waste program; expansion of existing landfills and siting of new landfills close to the metropolitan area; and the identification of alternative methods of resolving the County's solid waste crisis. For the City Council's information and review a copy of the plan's executive summary has been attached to this report. According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, twenty-four (24) cities have already taken action in support of the County's Solid Waste Action Plan and other cities are planning on taking a position as soon as the County Integrated Waste Management Task Force completes their review of their SRRE's. While support of this plan is necessary for the City to show adequate disposal capacity, it is non- binding and does not require that the City implement any of the County's solid waste management programs identified by this plan. RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN A. Recitals. (i) The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, also known as AB 939, requires the City to prepare, adopt, and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) which identifies how the City will divert, through a combination of source reduction, recycling, and composting programs, 25% of solid wastes from landfill disposal by 1995, and 50% by the year 2000; and (ii) The Act also requires the City to prepare a solid waste facility capacity component as part of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element; and (iii) The solid waste facility component must identify the current and future disposal capacity that will be needed to accommodate all of the solid waste that is generated within the City over a 15 -year period; and (iv) If the City does not show adequate capacity for its disposal needs, the State may reject the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and, after conducting a public hearing, may impose administrative civil penalties of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per day for failure to submit an adequate plan; and (v) The City does not have adequate disposal capacity to accommodate its waste disposal needs; and (vi) The City has not secured an export agreement with any jurisdiction or solid waste enterprise to meet its disposal needs; and (vii) The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County have heretofore adopted a Solid Waste Management Action Plan to facilitate regional planning measures on solid waste management problems facing the County; and (viii) The County's Solid Waste Management Action Plan establishes a comprehensive countywide strategy of managing solid waste and of providing 50 years of disposal capacity through a reasonable balance of public and private operations and solid waste disposal facilities, including a regional public landfill system; and (ix) The City can fulfill the disposal capacity requirements imposed under state law by formally supporting the County's Solid Waste Management Action Plan. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution. 2. That the comprehensive strategy established by the Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Action Plan is necessary to provide safe and reliable disposal capacity for solid waste generated within the City both now and into the future. 3. The City of Diamond Bar does hereby support the County's Solid Waste Management Action Plan and requests the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County to reaffirm their commitment to resolving the County's waste disposal crisis. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1993. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 2nd day of February, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar I I.Ji -�� �'_. -_ �. __ _Jl,•J i'I1 �r r'J � iJrl�i � ••%� CCVqNTY OF LOS AtvuE�:.�. TMONAts A. tf�M AAfo*, puwuf March 75s IM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS M 60UT" rX1114ONs Avabs ALIIAM911A,CAUNKNIA$110 N TfM�M�n Alq NilIM ADC"M Vu 5, 1988 SOLID VaTE MAMAGEWNT AC1100 PWM Eximlys 6a�..WwmY tv A"N A LN AM" CA:AMN- - 61M -A W WIN Pj" UMVG" WN -1 R uas : Reaffirm the eoard's policy of a►anaging solid waste in the County through a reasonable balance of public and private operations and facilities, including a regional public landfill ,syitM Ado ppV a policy providing for 50 years of permitted landfill capacity to be held in public ownership and with appropriate land use protection# Instruct the Director of Public works (DM and Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) and request the Chief Engineer and General Manager of the Sanitation Districts (CSD) to conduct czrtain studies in referents to the 'Preliminary Alternative Site Studd•. In concert with the CSO's Joint Refuse trust Fund, authorize the use of the County Refuse Disposal Trust fund to conduct these studies. Request City of Los An ties to proceed with development of 70100 11 Landfill. Also request the City, the C30•s Board to eupport tht action plan and participate owl ly with the county in the cost of feasibility studies, Support the Countywide recytliag, composting and household hazardous waste collection programSt dirett billing for refuse aerritiesi Statewide educ#tien programs; and expansion of Chiquita, SeMils and Sunshine Caoyons as well as Azusa Western and Fuente Hills landtills. Fisce Iffelcli County Refuse Disposal Trust fund will be used for prolinlolity studies associated with the iatplementation of the action plan. County General Funds will not be Mtilized:' _, On September TZ, 1"7, the bard instructed the DPV and CAO.. with LAa'asaistante of that CSD, to review the solid waste elanagasrent problem in the County and report regarding the solid waste 014814eate6► options, economic toosiderations, and the ideetification of the best sites for future landfill Capacity. The actlea pplab addrestes the'' Aiswat and provides roCWftndations.,to re,gotve 4M sptid',nate uee^I ,e- ment crisis in the County. Poswt-brand fox transmittal Memo 7974 #Off-+. MOMAi A. 17ptMA1►i0N. OInAN March 25, i9ea %• _ �.r -ri U • f A ♦Rv • �• • r► V wry• DEr ')RTMENT OF PUBLIC WOW IM tiO1RN 111[NOIiR A1�MLR AWAa�tsaA.lA1A/OOMl� 1teo.tml f.4'Mre Mp t![.1t1i1 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Lot Awles 303 Hall of Administration 00 Neat Temple Street Los Angeles. California 60012 pear Supervisors: SOLID WASTE KUMEMENT ACTION PLAN ALL DISTRICTS A DADS AU IMMIMf0NaL%C9 TOI F.0. fest Ida ALMAMARA. tAUi94%1A itad•IN$ 0 MsftV nawu MMA W"i R90MMMINt That your Board: I. Reaffirm its policy Of managisolid waste in Los Angeles County through a reasonable balance 21 public and private operations and facilities including a regional public landfill system. WN -2 Z. Adopt a policy providing for 50 yeart of permitted landfill cApa*CO ity to be held in public ownership, with appropriate land use Mtedtionse for use through publics private or publiciprivate ioint venture operations as necessary to achieve the policy in 9coannidation No. 1. 3. Instruct the Director of Public Works and Chief Adeiaistrative Officer and request the Chief Engineer and General wagger of the m Sanitation Districts to ediately initiate concurrent )�r studies necessary to determine the feasibiii of public ownership and par• mitting of landfill sites identified n the alternate site study; initlatO discusstons with property owners regarding availability of proper; secure pur;hese options as appropriates Otilize the County Refuse isposal Trust.fund and the Districts Joint Refuse trust rune for these efforts; and recmacnd further Board action as studies are completed for public acquisition and permitting of landfills at these aitea. 4. Support the Countywida implauntation of residential and commercial recycling and composting programs and a household hazardous waste program and instruct the Director of Public Yorks, Director of Health lervices. Etre Chief, Chief Administrative Officer and County Counse/s with the assistance of the County Solid Waste Management Committee, to recownd specific. actions to the turd to achieve lmplmnsntalfon inelpdil4 ordinances, licensing requirements and legislative requirements. Ln _ Lrw WM.: L iii — L`.: v oi� y� _ rnuy 1Jiy� 1V 4 iYO.VVi Honorable doird of 3upenrlsors Page t match tS, Ina 5. Request each city in the County to provide for each households whether single or awltl- a+mily residences, and each business to be billed directly for the full cost of refuse coliectioa'and disposal. a. Support implmotation of Statewide public education/awarenesspro- grams regar4leg solid waste Issues and the necessity for recyeline. Is support the revision of all existing permits at the Mori western, Chiquita C quo North Valloy-(Sunshine Canyon)o Puente Hilis and Scholl Canyon Landfills to provide for the maximwm, tochnicall and environmental feasible expansion of these sites, and instruct the Director of i6l1c Yorks, Director of Health Services and Chief Abein- istrgtive Officer to actively participate with the owners/operators and persittiq authorities of these Sites in securing the permit revisions at the earliest possible date. S. Request the Cwatii and or of Los Angeles to -proceed with actions necessary to open the Toyon 11 landfill and expand Lopes Canyon Landfill to folly realise the available capacity at throe locatl00s. e. Request the Council and Mayor of Los Angeles and the Sanitation Districts toards to support this action laA and particip�ate equally_ with the County In the cosi oftfeasibill r atudiiee;, awd "� fit! e a •noose in *operation with a Director of is iwrks f Administrative Officer, to recommend a method of financidg acquisitioft of landfill capacity. On September no ilAl, the Board instructed the Departmeat of Pnbiic Yorks and Chief Administrative Officer, with the issistance.of the Sanitation bistritts. to review the solid waste mina t problem in the County and report regarding the solid waste nava emsat options. atommit considerations, and the ideatiti- cation of the bast sass for future landfill capacity. The following enclosed reports have been prepared, discussed In detail with Bard sonbsra and sum- reriaod belowl -- tExeeutive Summary - Solid Waste Plana ennt Status and Disposal Options in Los Angeles County• -- Vrelininary Alternate Site xtuayt This document suinnart=es a detailid report on the existleg solid waste ■wnage- Mont system and options for -the future manageiment of the County's waste@ lnclud ng the economics of each option. TM information was derel*W by the Sanitation Districts, kpartment of Public `Works, and City Ouremr Of Sanitation �Ll luw� iJu.'Jvt r.',u Honorable Bard of Supervisors Foos S March ti o ISM and represents the first time in recent years that the technical staffs of these three 400cies have concurred in such a broad range of solid waste sxsnadexnent data. The fell report, which is available upon request and Includes a "TIM to crisis Analysis•s is swparized for Your convenience in the eaelosum The a jor fact: are as follWas -- by 1"to @jo @j4tons per day of waste will have no place for disposal —unTiTs new facilities are sited or existtng-landfills aro expanded. This will 1 tit ren se to 50 o QW tons per day by the year 2000. -- Currehtly# 0#400 tons per day of waste are exported from the City of Los Angeles. mar The City of Los Angeles, will have no disposal capacity remaining within the City by IOU. -- ImpleaxentatloA of Countywide residential racycli , landfill recycling and caposting progron with 100 percent participation and efficiency will reduce the total MastestreM OPtimiStICA11Y by V parent@ Ralisticall � it is pro�eeted that recycling an4 C"osting will reduce tM total we: estram by 10 percent. •qP Expansion of oxistinq landfills and siting of now landfills CIOs+ to the ntrwlltan are will result in total d1s ul _ costs of $150 to million annxtal ly as coWreti to $50 to $900 pin Milian anaially for rants sites or very rants situ with fall Mule W.- it is iniportant to note that the cost projections are extroftly conservative. rot instance, estimated waste managament tees are calculated on a Cost driven basis and do not reflect possible dr&ntle increases in fees as has occurred in other portions of the United States, quo to dirket forces as disposal xsapacity becws a scarcer resour0o. ALT RNATIVE SITE ZIM on September YZl Igue the Board requested the Departunt of Public Yorkst-Chiof Administrative Officer and SWUM* Districts to Identif the five boat land- fill sites evrrentl not being used in the County. This s urly consisted of a three-phase approach which considered a cwflex sot of technical, enviroxYsental and social factors to analyas 101otential landfill sites. The six highest ranking potential sites &ft presented in the report. f Nonorable Board of Supervi=ors Fags 4 March 26, IOU RELMN010 6JT1215 t Considering the three to seven years required to tapiamat any additional disposal capacity, tits projected crisis of 1"2 is actually a crisis today. in my opielon, the Board must sake hard and probably unpopular decisions now if the crisis is to be abated. Unless you are willing to increase waste disposal costs by its percent or more and shift the responsibility of waste disposal facilities to neighboring counties, your long-term options are to: - a 4P site new landfills in the metropoinan area. or •- site new landfills ill the metropolitan area and construct waste -to -energy (acilities. In the short run, Z believe that Implementation or recycling and eaVa sting programs Mg expansion of existing landfills IS a necessity, not an option. It is important to wphasise that there is qb single program solution or single site or • 'r expansion that will abate the calsis to tM thatt or long term. We must proceed iowd%tsly on several fronts as set forth in the reeom ni- dations. The situation we face today is nearly identical to what was faced in the 1ee0's when the Board initiated the regional public landfill system, with the exception that we have 30 rears experience and the public's enriro aantal sensitivity is substantially greater. The experience has, shown that a com- bination of public and private operators has worked well and a reasonable balance of public and private operations is an effective scans of controlling disc -)sal costs. Landfill technology and regulations have advanced environmental saftguards substantially such that design and operational wasures can nke landfills technically and environmentally compatible with my adjoining land use. Although all the recommendations ars integral to solving the crisis, the key to the long-term solution is Necopmendation No. 2--90-year landfill capaciin public ownership, parented fat landfill use and protected from i�►coapatIbia. adjacent land ustse ubstantial study and discussions with landowners is necessary to datemine it the identified sites ars suitable for landfill pur- poses. by adopting the recd mendatlons, the bard will authorise us to proceed with this work and report to the bard with further recamitodatient on atqui si- tlofts ss studies are eompttted. Honorable Board of Supervisor=. Page s March Zs, IOU The Chief Administrative Officer concur► In this recon faded eetion plan. i cannot stress enough the need to proceed with this effort. Upon approval, we will keep the k4rd advised of progress and report beck with further recomien- .detions as soon as possible, Respectfully submitte , + T. T 0fMA S Director of Public Works ,1M:c��srraAP Inc. ce: Chief AdMInistrative Office County counsel County Witation Districts or Los Angeias Counter City of Los AnDaless Bureau of Sanitation. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 64 TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 26, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Full Performance Bond Exoneration for Condominium Complex at 800 S. Grand Avenue, Tract 51079. SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to exonerate the bond posted for full performance of the Subdivision Agreement for Tract No. 51079 (800 S. Grand Avenue). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of the Faithful Performance Bond posted for off-site improvements at 800 S.Grand Avenue in the amount of $100,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the American Motorists Insurance Company and Diamond Brothers One Partnership of the City Council's action. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Ordinances(s) X Other: Copy of Full Performance Bond X Agreement: Subdivision EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Be n er City Manager MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. February 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Exoneration of Full Performance Bond for Condominium Complex at 800 S.Grand Avenue, Tract No. 51079. ISSUE STATEMENT This report requests the exoneration of a full performance bond posted for off-site improvements on Tract No. 51079 by Diamond Brothers. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of the Faithful Performance Bond posted for off-site improvements on Tract 51079 in the amount of $100,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the American Motorists Insurance Company and Diamond Brothers One Partnership of the City Council's action. FINANCIAL SUMMARY This action has no impact on the City's 1992-1993 budget. DISCUSSION All of the street improvement work for the condominium complex at 800 S.Grand Avenue has now been completed. The Department of Public Works Inspector has approved (a) installation of all the sidewalks on Grand Avenue and (b) pavement replacement on Grand Avenue after installation of sewer laterals. The Department of Public Works has inspected and approved the construction of the traffic signal and the related signing and striping. The signal is deemed acceptable for maintenance by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The City continues to retain a street improvement bond of $20,000, a grading bond of $7,000 and a labor and material bond of $501000. The following listed surety bond needs to be exonerated: Tract No.: 51079 Bond Number: 3SM 776 399 00 Principal: Diamond Brothers One Partnership Surety: American Motorists Insurance Company Amount: $100,000 Prepared By: Anne Garvey rU-b24 r �Gtttite6� �. �i�e�ee TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING January 18, 1993 Mr. David Liu, P.E. Associate Engineer City of Diamond Bar Suite 200 21660 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 SUBJECT: Traffic Signal 800 South Grand Avenue Dear David_ Construction of the traffic signal and the related signing and striping has been completed to our satisfaction. Bob Williams of the Los Angeles County Public Works Department also reviewed it and found it to be acceptable for County maintenance. I recommend the work be accepted by the city. If you need more information, please call me. Sincerely, Warren C. Siecke, P.E- diabar 20142 CANYON DR., YORBA LINDA, CA 92686 • 714/970-6247 • FAX 779-1644 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND 3SK 776 399 00 Premium: $2,000.00 Whereas, The City CouAcil of the City of Diamond Bar, State' of Diamond Brothers One California, and Partnership (hereinafter designated as f1principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improve- ments, which said agreement, dated _, August 4th , 1992, and identi- fied as project See Below , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and Tract No. 51079-800 S. Grand Ave., Diamond Bar, CA Offsite Improvements -Street, Lights & Si Whereas, Said principal is required under Mhe terms of said agiesament tizu furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. Now, therefore, we, the principal and American Motorists Insurancg Company as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Diamond Bar, hereinafter called ( 11 Obligee ") , in the penal sum of See Below dollars ($100,000.09 lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. ** One hundrqd thousandd no1100** The condition of th�s obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shill in all things stand to and abide by , and well and truly keep a,,id perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner tnerein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City of Diamond Bar , its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by city in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered. _.___._..._._._...... .... ............... .....-uwun iu 11at^M,r.v.oWI!1t54.t;anoga I-WX, VH y i w4 -i 104 4 -. The surety hereby stipulates and A rents that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on August 4, , 1992. Appropriate modifications shall be made in such form if t:aa .nerformance_of.. an -act _-not_brovided 2X State of CALIFORNIA CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER C ounty of LOS ANGELES ❑ INDIVIDUAL(S) r+tJ 1��� ❑ CORPORATE On before me, KIMBERLY A. BADARACCO, A NOTARY PUBLIC OFFICER(S) DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC' TITLE(S) personally appeared DAVID Z. NODDLE ❑ PARTNER(S) %U ATTORNEY-IN-FACT I NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [personally known to me - OR - fl nrnvar-i to mo nn the hacic of caticfnrtnn. o,.i.ao.,..n ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5179 State Of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES On AUG. 4, 1992 before me, MARIA G. SANTANA, NOTARY PUBLIC DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER- E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared RICKY CHANG NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR - ® proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(g) whose name(g) is/ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heATWQhvd� executed the same in his/AWt' MARIA G.SANTANA authorized capacity(W and that by Notary Public—Callromia 611MyOFFICIALNOTARYSEAL his�signatureo) on the instrument IASANGEpES COUNTYthe comm.Expites Nov i3,t994 erson s or the entit u on behalf of P ()� Y P which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness -my hand anjJ official,seal. QhtA �-C/i1Cr/�?it SIGNATURE OF NOTARY CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL []CORPORATE OFFICER(S) TITLE(S) ® PARTNER(S) LIMITED ® GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DIAMOND BROTHERS ONE PARTNERSHTP ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages 2 Date of Document AUGUST 4, 1992 TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above 1� G i� g�$ tPfSTA ��M��c , WINY LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND 3SH 776 399 00 Premium included in the Perf. . Bond Whereas, The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, State of Diamond Brothers One California, and Partnership (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improve- ments, which said agreement, dated , 1992, and identified as project See Below , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and Tract No. 51079-800 S. Oram? AV— D3snund Bar, CA . CffzLte.iaprovements Streets, Lights & Si Whereas, Under the terms of said agreement, pfincipal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Diamond Bar to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commenc- ing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. Now, therefore, said principal and the undersigned as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Diamond Bar and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of See Below dollars ($ 50,000.00 ) , for materials furnished or labor, thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by city in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be'awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgement therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as **Fifty thousand and no/100** to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. State of CALIFORNIA CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Cotnty Of LOS ANGELES ❑ INDIVIDUAL(S) ❑ CORPORATE On before me, KIMBERLY A. BADARACCO 2 A NOTARY pDBL�C OFFICER(S) DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' TITLE(S) DAVID Z. NODDLE ❑ PARTNER(S) personally appeared XUATTORNEY-IN-FACT NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) Mersonally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ❑ TRUSTEE(S) to be the Person(s) whose namarcl icimro ❑ SUBSCRIBING WITNESS ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 5179 State of CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES On AUG. 4, 1992 before me, MARTA G. SANTANA, NOTARY PUBLIC DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.,'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC - personally appeared RICKY CHANG NAME(S) OF SIGNERS) ❑ personally known to me - OR - ® proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s� whose name(N.) is/ax subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/. MUM -y executed the same in his/KKYANU — = - - - - - - - - authorized capacity, and that by OFFICIALNOTARYSEAL his/JgXtb& signature(S) on the instrument MARIA G. SANTANA Notary Public -Caldorria the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of • LOS ANGELES COUNTY which the person(s) acted, executed the My Comm Expires NOV 13.1994 instrument. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER(S) TITLE(S) ® PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED © GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DIAMOND BROTHERS70NE PARTNERSHIP Witness my hand and official seal. ; I SIGNATURE OF NOTARY ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages 2 Dat c me t AUGUST 4, 1992 TO THE DOCUMENT ���ID , �0 CT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above AMERICAN MOTORIST INSURANCE COMPANY } "-AN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY e--, lce.' Long Grove, IL 60049 OnaL ®SURan msu VI Empan es OF ATTORNEY W Men By These Presents: American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint David Z. Noddle of Los Angeles, California its true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 1992, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertakin exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, clack, craft or letter of credit. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds in order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said American Motorists Insurance Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1992. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect: "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys -in -fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1928 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof, the American Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 30 day of March , 1992 . Attested and Certified: F.C.McCullough, Secretary 0 (OVER) AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY by J.S.Kemper,III,Senior Vice President STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF LAKE I, Grace E. Condon, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and F. C. McCullough personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are respectively as Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. My commission expires: 5-14-94 ! "OFFICIAL SEAL" ► 4 Grace E. Condon f Notary Public, State of Illinois ► ( My Commission Expues $114194 ��r�rr�o'r►r��r�►�r CERTIFICATION Gr:aa E. Condon, Notary Public I, N. J. Zarada, Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the attached Power of Attorney dated March 30, 1992 on behalf of the person(s) as listed on the reverse side is a true and correct copy and that the same has been in full force and effect since the data thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper, III and F. C. McCullough who executed the Power of Attorney as Senior Vice President and Secretary respectively were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the American Motorists Insurance Company on this day of A U r 0 ti 199- , 19 N.J.Zarads, Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. FM 836-5 5-90 1H PRINTED IN U.S.A. Power of Attorney - Tera SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Tentative Tract No. 51079 /Final Tract No. 51079 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this 4th day of August , 19g_, by and between Diamond Brothers One Partnership (hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider") and the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "city"). A. Recitals. (i) There has been previously approved a Tentative Tract Map for Tract No. 51079 in the City of Diamond Bar. (ii) Subdivider seeks approval of a Final Map covering a portion of the area of Tentative Tract No. 51079 and bearing Final Tract No. 51079 B. Agreement. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. In consideration of City's approval of and filing Tentative Subdivision Tract Map No. 51079 and Final Tract No. 51079 , Subdivider undertakes and agrees that it will, at Subdivider's sole cost and expense, make all the improvements upon and in connection with said Tract in accordance with plans and specifications therefor on file with City, incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and including all matters required DISC\TMBONDS M 2.2112-89 1 by the Planning Commission and City Council of City in connection with the various steps leading to approval of said Tentative Tract No. 51079 Subdivider also undertakes and agrees upon the same consideration to comply with all ordinances and regulations of City,, and to do all other and further acts required of it pursuant to this Agreement. Subdivider agrees in connection therewith to pay or cause to be paid all amounts becoming due to contractors, subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to the foregoing Final Tract with respect to such improvements, or to Subdivider with respect thereto. Subdivider agrees that all such improvements shall be constructed and completed in accordance with City standards as determined by the City Engineer and in accordance with any applicable conditions as hereinabove referred to, and in accordance with the remaining provisions of this Agreement. In case of any dispute, the good faith judgment of the City Engineer shall be final and binding upon the parties. 2. Subdivider undertakes and agrees that all the work of improvement shall be completed within 365 days from the date of this Agreement. 3. Should Subdivider fail to comply with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, Subdivider shall be liable to City for the reasonable value of any work or improvements not completed or improperly done or performed. In the event of any such failure, City shall give to Subdivider written notice thereof. Unless the work or improvements covered by said notice, DISC\THBONDS\DB 2.2\12-89 2 including defective work and improvements, are commenced by Subdivider within fifteen (15) days of the date of said notice and diligently prosecuted to completion, City may at its option: (a) Collect from Subdivider the reasonable value of the work and improvements not so done and performed by Subdivider, to be measured by the anticipated costs and expenses of completing the same; or (b) City may complete said work and improvements not so completed by Subdivider and collect its costs and expenses in completing the same; or (c) City may as to some of such work and improvements proceed under remedy (a) above, and as to the remainder under remedy (b) above. City may change any election prior to trial of any lawsuit, and prior thereto no election of remedies shall be binding upon City. In either event there shall be included in said "costs and expenses", the reasonable overhead expenses of the City. In addition to the foregoing, Subdivider shall be liable to City for reasonable attorneys, fees and court costs incurred by City in enforcing the obligations of Subdivider under this Agreement. 4. All slope banks over three (3) feet in vertical height within said Tract shall be landscaped with plantings approved by the City Engineer. Sprinklers shall be installed on all slopes over three (3) feet in vertical height along arterial streets and shall be of a type and according to a sprinkler plan DISC%TMBONDS%DB 2.2N12-89 3 approved by the City Engineer, with sprinkler turn -ons at the tops of the slopes, and connected with the remainder of the water systems of the lots of which such slopes are a part. 5. Subdivider shall give bonds with a corporate bonding company, or similar instrument, satisfactory to City in the following amounts and for the following purposes: a. A bond in the amount of $ 100,000.00 guaranteeing full performance of all the terms of this Agreement; b. A bond in the amount of $50,000.00 securing payment to the contractor, his subcontractor and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them with respect to said public improvements; C. A bond in the amount of $ N/A securing the setting of monuments. 6. Acceptance of any work or improvements by City shall not constitute an acknowledgment by City that the same are properly done or•performed, except as to any items or matters readily apparent from an inspection thereof. Except as to such matters so readily apparent, Subdivider shall repair any defects which occur in the work of improvements within a one (1) year period thereof following acceptance by City. As a condition precedent to the acceptance of the improvements hereunder as being complete and prior to the release of any bonds required under paragraph 5., hereof, securing the faithful performance of Builder's obligations hereunder, Subdivider shall give a bond with a corporate bonding company, or DISCMBONDS\DB 2.2\12-89 4 5 similar instrument, satisfactory to city in the amount of $ 30,000.00 as guarantee and warranty of the work for a one (1) year period following the completion and acceptance thereof against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished. 7. All notices to Subdivider may be sent to 18645 E. Gale Ave Suite205 Industry , California 91748 or at such other address of which City shall actually receive notice in writing specifically calling attention to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. Diamond Brothers One Partnership, a Limited Partnership BY R'cky C.Y. Chang(- General, a er BY CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a municipal corporation _ By DISC\TMBONDS\DB 2.2\12-89 5 Mayor City C1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On Aug„st• 12 , 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared JAY C. KIM and LYNDA BURGESS, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL 4!". TOMMYE ANNE NICE Notary Public — Caftmia LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Expires MAR 31,1995 otary Public AAITHPUL PERFORMANCE BOND 3SM 776 399 00 Premium: $2,000.00 Whereas, The City council of the City of Diamond Bar, State of Diamond Brothers One California, and Partnership (hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improve- ments, which said agreement, dated _ August 4th , 1992, and identi- fied as project See Below , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and Tract No. 51079-800 S. Grand Ave., Diamond. Bar, CA Offsite Tuprovements-Street, Lights & Signs Whereas, Said principal is required under the terms of said agzaement ::o furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. Now, therefore, we, the principal and American Motorists Insurancg Company as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Diamond Har, hereinafter called ( 11 Obligee ") , in the penal sum of see Below dollars ($100,000.09 lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. ** One huunnddrred thousand Pr�o100gion is such that if the above The condition of thisnd obligation bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, &hall in all things stand to and abide by , and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner tnerein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City of Diamond Bar , its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and voids otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by city in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered. FROt1 GIHMON) 6ROTMER The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on August 4, , 1992. Appropriate modifications shall be made in such Form if t. a bond is being furnished for the performance of an act not provided for by agreement. Diamond Brothers One Partnership American Motorists Principal Surety /--,, By: BY: 7 p SEAL David Z. Nod e , Attorney in Fact LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND 3SH 776 399 00 Premium included in the Perf. Bond Whereas, The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, State of Diamond Brothers One California, and Partnership (hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improve- ments, which said agreement, dated , 1992, and identified as project See Below , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and lTgct`No. 51079-800 S. Grand Ave. D-1gac,nd Bar, CA . Lwprovements Streets, Li is a Si Whereas, Under the terms of said agree ent, pincipal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Diamond Bar to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commenc- ing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. Now, therefore, said principal and the undersigned as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Diamond Bar and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of See Below dollars ($ 50,000.00 ) , for materials furnished or labor. thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the a-mount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by city in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgement therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all- persons, companies and corporations entitled to file clains under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as **Fifty thousand and no/100** to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. In witness 'lherpcf, Q:.is has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on August 4, , 1992. Diamond Brothers One Partnership PRINCIPAL BY: ZA'L 0 AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY r--, Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 naTlonal InSURance camrmes POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint David Z. Noddle of Los Angeles, California ********** its true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 1992, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings pprovided the amount of no one bond or undertakin eaceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which gua".ntses the payment or collection of any promissory note, chock, craft or letter of credit. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds in order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said American Motorists Insurance Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly *looted officers at its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1992. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect: "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys -In -fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognisances, contracts of indemnity and other writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company way appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile an any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on Frbruary 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof, the American Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 39 day of Mwrch , 1942 . Attested and Cartified: F.C.McCullough, Secretary (OVER) by J.S.Kemper,III,Senicr Vice President AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY (OVER) by J.S.Kemper,III,Senicr Vice President STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF LAKE I, Grace E. Condon, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and F. C. McCullough personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are respectively as Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before we this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own from and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set farth. My commission expires: 5-14-94 1 "OFFICIAL SEAL" ► 4 Grace E. Condon ► Notary Public. State of Illinois ► My commission Expires SIL4194 ► 'W'W 1W 1W •r'r rr 1W'► V V 1W'W CERTIFICATION Ortce E. Condon, Notary Public I, N. J. Zarada, Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the attached Power Of Attorney dated March 3$, 1992 on behalf of the person(s) as listed on the reverse side is a true and correct copy and that the same has been in full force and effect since the date thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of this c*rtifieate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper, III and F. C. McCullough who executed the Power of Attorney as Senior Vice President and Secretary respectively were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the American an Motorists Insurce Company on this day of A U G 04 1992 , 19 N.J.Zarsda, Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the wanner and to the extent herein stated. FM 836-5 5-90 1M PRINTED IN U.S.A. Power of Attorney - Term AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.1 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 1" ,B TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of "2 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue SUMMARY: In order to provide additional parking for delivery trucks to load and unload and allow smaller vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking lot, Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe requested the removal of the current "No Stopping Anytime" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. In lieu of the current signs, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends the installation of "2 -Hour Parking" signs at this location. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime " signs and installing of "2 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Traffic & Transportation Minutes Signing and Striping Plan 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Traffic and Transportation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REVIEWED Y: Ter ence L. BeUger GeorgA. Wentz L�/ City Manager InterillCity Engi CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue ISSUE STATEMENT Remove the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and install 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and installing 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The costs associated with the signs, installation and signing and striping are estimated to be $1,000, and will be funded by traffic control maintenance account. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, located at the northeast corner of Colima Road and Lemon Avenue requested the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs in lieu of the current "No Parking Anytime" signs. The request originated from the need to provide additional parking for the business' delivery trucks for loading and unloading purposes, thus, allowing customers to maneuver easier within the existing parking lot. Additionally, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends that a right -turn only lane be striped through the #2 traffic lane as shown on the attached signing and striping plan. PREPARED BY: Tseday Aberra David G..Liu RESOLUTION NO. 93 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CONSENTING TO THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING "NO STOPPING ANYTIME" SIGNS AND ESTABLISHING A "2 -HOUR PARKING" SIGNS ON COLIMA ROAD EAST OF LEMON AVENUE A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on December 10, 1992. (ii) At the meeting of December 10, 1992 the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the removal of existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs and the installation of the 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue in this resolution are appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends installation of said signs. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the City Council, provides for the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs upon approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by the removal of existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs and the installation of the 112 -Hour Parking" sign regulation on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. 2. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Stopping Anytime" signs have been removed amd the 112 -Hour Parking" signs have been posted as required in Section 1 of this resolution. 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the Mayor to cause signs to be erected. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , 1993 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1993 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar ll*'4T-ILI.:. A14 too, ' AlIYi1ME" j16u' To BE Rex4v6D Ar4P 1-13-rALL- Ho tA8Z IIF 40- -f .1 Ir Vt) ARROW AfeWACH Ex. ClrL� 'PROP. 6" WPOTC LI.JG Iv —i l civ /00 ON CMAA Pr U;MOM See G. D, 18.9.0 o I tt ��LIMITRIAHT LAP4Ecv-R�Th(HS� (�nR17 RtC�Moll- 51cl _ ;, tir1G �IyD �oYPING 'f1pF+ ` 3L Ca) ARK�W Sy. 99AVF- �j Map. all wHtm Linz — - _' 9'0 ),I e- �lZoPoSED SIG' � Seev•D•/�9� ` December 10, 1992 Page g AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury's inquiry if staff can give notification in time to bring the matter back in January of 1993, stated that staff will send out notification of the proposed signs immediately. The Commission voted upon the Motion made by VC/Gravdahl. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Remove Parking AA/Aberra reported that, pursuant to the Restrictions Commission's request of November 12, 1992, staff on Colima Rd. has provided a site plan identifying the lane east of designations and street dimensions to study Lemon Ave. potential traffic movement conflicts on Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue. The owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe is requesting the removal of the existing "No Stopping Anytime" sign on the north side of Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue, and is requesting the consideration of a 2 -hour parking restriction sign in front of the shopping center in order to provide delivery trucks an area to load and unload, thus allowing smaller vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking lot. It is recommended that the Commission recommend to the City Council the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and install 112 -hour parking" signs in front of the shopping center. Charles Ricotta, residing at 20651 Colima Road, Walnut, owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, expressed his support for staff's recommendation. Sgt. Rawlings reiterated the Sheriff's Department's opposition to the continued expansion of time parking controls because of the difficulty in enforcement. C/Beke stated that there needs to be some striping to channelize the 36 foot area to protect motorists exiting the driveway, to include another through lane, and designate a right -turn only lane. Chair/Chavers, concurring with C/Beke, stated that he is not opposed to the parking scenario, but is uncomfortable that street is in an untenable position. Staff can take care of the channelization plan without bringing it back to the Commission. December 10, 1992 Policy Statement for estab. warrants for adult crossing Page 9 C/Beke stated that the channelization plan is to include a second through lane striped, the right turn lane striped, and stripe at least 10 or 12 feet out from the curb so that there is room to Pull out of that driveway and see around a truck. Charles Ricotta, in response to C/Ury, stated that the 2 -hour parking is needed for added parking for the customers, as well as for deliveries. C/Ury pointed out that even with a 2 -hour parking area, the trucks may still park inside the parking area. A loading zone may handle the situation better than a 2 -hour parking zone. Charlie Ricotta stated that a 2 -hour parking sign would allow parking for either customers or delivery trucks. C/Ury suggested that the area be left without the "No Parking" signs, and the employees should be instructed to park out in the street to let the customers have the convenience of parking inside the lot. This would probably promote less movement of traffic. C/Beke pointed out that the City does not want overnight parking of rigs on Colima Road. Chair/Chavers stated that since the owner feels that the 2 -hour parking would work, he has no objection to the recommendation made. However, if the 2 -hour parking does not work, then the owner should be responsible to pay for the next set of signs. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's recommendation, with the provisions that the #2 traffic lane, a right turn only lane, be striped through there, and that the lane be far enough from the curb so that the cars exiting the driveway can see around the parked vehicles. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. AA/Aberra reported that the Commission requested that the current locations, which are served by adult crossing guards, be identified and ranked accordingly. Based on the counts of school children, conducted during the week of September CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager 27 1993 MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of e Corporation Fallow Field Drive, in front of First Mortgag Corporation SUMMARY: Based on a shortage of onsite parking spaces, w loyees in the and Pasco Cage Based on building have been parking on residential streets such as parking. The Traffic concerns from residents in the area, the City Council previously took action to restrict .-8_00 a.m., and Transportation Commission recommends the additional installation of ration 1No Parkin ated on Fallow Field Drive. Monday -Friday" signs directly in front of First Mortgage Carpo loc COMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of RE COM Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, directly "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m.,the inersecon of Fallow 1n front of First Mortgage Corporation and install up to 50 feet of geld Driet and attdrieway entrances Field Drive & Diamond Bar Boulevard and at Pasco Court & Fallow to assure clear sight distances. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X_ Other: Traffic & TransWrtation Minutes Vicinity Mag SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes X No — by the City Attorney? Ma orit 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Yesy X No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? Traffic and Trans ortation Commission Yes X No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? — Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REVIEWED BY: G reA.N Te rence L. Be n er In erim City City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager FROM: Monday -Friday" day" ive, 6:00 a.m.-8x00 a•m'in front of First SUBJECT: Installation gnslPon the westerlyside nof Fallow Field Dr Mortgage Corporation ISSUE STATEMENT „ 6:00 a.m.- a.m., Monday -Friday" signs be installed on Should No Parking, in front of First Mortgage the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, Corporation. RECOMMENDATION roving the 93 -XX app ns on the That the City Council consider Resolution Monday -Friday" sig „ 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Mortgage Corporation. installation of No Parking, easterly side of Fallow Field Drive in fat the lritersecti of Fallow Filed and install up to 50 feet of red curbingrt Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard and at Pasco sht distances. Fallow Field Drive an at driveway entrances to assure clear g FINANCIAL SUMMARY and will The costs associated with the ma tenance accountimated to be $200, be funded by traffic control BACKGROUND "2 -Hour First Mortgage Corporation street frontage signson with the exception of day -Friday" signs are presently p rict Parking, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 P.m-, MonThese signs were installed to rogation o Court Fallow Field Drive and Pascemployees of First Mortgage Corp parking on residential streets by building and car-poolers. First Mortgage Corporation requested that three(3) of On December 10, 1992, to be removed ee these signs located acro on streetr parking.the office building to allow for additional DISCUSSION the Traffic and Transportation CommissMinuteslon fromlscussed that meeting is On January 14, 1993, signing in the vicinity. matter and the remaining are attached. Page Two Parking: Fallow Field Drive February 2, 1993 the attached To solicit adds sent ton5otfrom residents in the area, residents in the immediate area. For the City a summary of responses is included on the questionnaire wa Council's information, questionnaire. rather, In general, the residents did not want The response waso relax the t due primarily to there was a desire to prohibit parking. the following factors: 1) The business complex should provide employee parking onsite; 2) This is the entry into the community; 3) Cleanup of litter is a concern, and parked in the 4) Street cleaning is difficult when cars are constantly area. on the tenancy The request by First Mortgage Corporation was based primarily ees in the out growing the original estimates of the number eerfeet•empFi°rst Mortgage building. The office building is 22,000 sq ace is ft. and the remaining 71500 sq. ft. of officessP occupies 14,500 sq. a e employs 70 to 80 employ (FT/PT) leased to various tenants. Firstor spaces. and has available a total of 71 pa a e to encourage Staff has met and discussed icusse theneed ives to limit r First of vehicles. carpooling and similar Based on the testimony, the Traffic and Transportation concluded the following: 1) That the existing signs should remain. It would still provide short term parking for clients of First Mortgage; 2 That the existing 112 -Hour Parking" signs begin at the first residence on the east side of Fallow Field Drive; t carpool parking. This signs be Monday -Friday" g 3) That the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., installed in front of First Mortgagland to will rovide approximately 6 to 8 spaces; court & he tion 4 That red curbing be installed as Boulevards&c f Fallow Field Drive Pasco for Fallow Field Drive and Diamond B safety purposes. Staff is An additional concern from o park of atheir is hhouses. e impact of f our parking on their ability to Pa ermits to residents to allow them to evaluating the possibility of issuing p in the area with no restriction. park their personal vehicles PREPARED BY: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra RESOLUTION NO. 93-_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OOF A-14--8:0.M-,MAY- FRIDAY" CITY A OF IAXO DND BAR ESTABLISHING NO PARKING, FRIDAY" SIGNS ON E EASTERLY FOAD AND ASCO COURTSIDE OF FALLOW DRIVE BETWEEN BREA CANYON A. RECITALS. The Traffic and Transportation Commission (i) considered this matter at a public meeting on January 14, 1993. At the meeting of January 14, 1993, the Traffic (ii) ermined that the installation of and Transportation Commission det the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, between Brea Canyon Cut-off Road and Pasco Court identified in this resolution are appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends installation of said signs. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the City Council, ,� 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., provides for the installation of No Parking, Monday -Friday" signs upon approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by establishing "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.- �� ulation for the easterly side of 8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday sign reg Fallow Field Drive, between Brea Canyon Cut-off Road and Pasco Court. 2. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs have been posted as required in Section 1 of this resolution. 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the Mayor to cause signs to be erected indicating where the sign are to be required. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , 1993 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of , 1993 by the of Diamond Bar held on da Y following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: of Diamond Bar City Clerk, City ad 031 titre i allonrPp s ea s� to °' LEGEND V r0 W11A % # f�J � b �rKOtu7ti4i"fSopARKIPI6,e-6A.,�n,;ViovDA �+ ,a m FRIDAY°516N5 M F w �• A EXISTING - � HOUR PARKIN , �.� N '°• o SAM-SPM, MONDAY - b F1ZlDM "SIGNS IF 14 I+ 051.\ ��'4 �. CF S>SO i 'mac G° O �' � 23 •b' � o.s° ?q `'\ �� IIID S9 -To bb �'! I�'^c Si691Mj� 'III S �• Fc1e Y�� .z y ro, y �`)� '�+0 mob•; •; '�/ 'I� � / .y• Yds` J 04, v z� � n N Ss ,Q /� •� � b, O 4H 3e d ti Y, 28 °> a�, fO 26S �=1 � .r II ./,�/s•) S3 �/�`' y�nb aJ ,� 12 S .D NVj40r DIAMOND BAR -WALNUT PPOCLAMAT ION] Whereas, youth represent tine future of our city, ration, and the world; and WI-,ereas, Americzn communities today greatly beneFit from the unique contribution the YMCA makes in meeting the needs of youth and adults of all ages, and Whereas, the YMCA helps to develop the complete person .n spirit, mind and body: and Whereas, anyone may loin the YMCA regardless of race, gender, creed or economic status, and Whereas, the Yfv1CA has been a strong Force in promoting humal-, ul-iderstrndin iii Diamond Bar for thirteen brotherhood and g years, Now therefore, be it resolved that I, Gary Miller, Mayor of Diamond Bar, do hereby proclaim the month of February 1993 as YMCA month to honor the organization For its long time con- tribution to our community, and in turn urge support For its Annual Buppor t Camoa i gn 22600 SUNSET BROSSIH OF TORIAMOND E POMONA R. CAL FORNIIPO917 5MC(A 14) 860-0387 DIAMOND BAR -WALNUT January 19, 1993 Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Lynda: The Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA would like to request a Proclamation from the City of Diamond Bar to announce the Annual Support Campaign. The 1993 Annual Support Campaign will kick off on Thursday, February 4. The campaign is the primary fundraiser for the YMCA. The money raised through this program provides financial assistance for programs, sponsorships for memberships, and enables the YMCA to provide programs at an affordable cost. I have enclosed a sample proclamation for you to review. If this is acceptable, I would like to have it presented at the council meeting prior to the February 4 kick off. I appreciate your help and cooperation as we try to make this year's campaign a great success. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you again. Respectfully, 7 6� f mess - err White ra ch Director Encl. v Ay oz,,o"- 22600 SUNSETA BRANCHCROSSING OF DIAMOND POMONA R. CAL FORNIIPOL91765 17 5 0 ( 14) 860-0387 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.2 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO --Z TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the North Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road. SUMMARY: At the December 15, 1992 City Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare the bid specifications for the installation of metal beam guard railing along the north side of Grand Avenue. At this time, specifications for the subject project have been prepared. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the specifications of the Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the North Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the project for bids. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification X Bid Specifications (on file in City Clerk's Office) Other 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: I Terrence L. Bela r George A. City Manager Interi City CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the North Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road. ISSUE STATEMENT This report requests the City Council's approval and authorization to advertise the project for bids. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 93- authorizing the project to be advertised. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The anticipated construction cost is between $5,000.00 and $65,000.00 pending upon the quantities, and whether new or salvaged materials are utilized. A funding source recommendation will be made after the bids are formally opened. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION At the December 15, 1992 City Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare the bid specifications for the installation of guardrails. Specifications for the project have been prepared. The work to be performed under the specifications consists of the installation of metal beam guard railing and other incidental and appurtenant work necessary for the proper construction of the contemplated improvement. The project area includes approximately 250 lineal feet to 2,500 lineal feet of Grand Avenue northerly right-of-way line. Key aspects of requirements placed upon the contractor includes: * Plan and schedule to be submitted at least several calendar days before beginning of work. * Notification to affected agencies. * Completion of all work within ten (10) working days. * Liquidated damages of $100/day for non-performance. guard * Alternate bid items for separate quantities and conditions of g rails. 1 Page Two Guard Railing January 27, 1993 All customary insurance and bonds have been included. The contract and bid documents have been prepared in cooperation with the City Attorney. Staff has prepared a tentative schedule for the various project activities. They are as follows: Specifications to City Council for approval and authorize City Clerk to advertise for bids Bid Opening Award of Contract Notice to Proceed Start of Construction Completion of Construction Prepared By: David G. Liu K February 2, 1993 February 18, 1993 March 2, 1993 March 15, 1993 March 22, 1993 April 2, 1993 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF METAL BEAM GUARD RAILING ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF GRAND AVENUE AT ROLLING KNOLL ROAD, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Diamond Bar to construct certain improvements in the City of Diamond Bar. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented to the City of Diamond Bar be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the Northerly Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing of the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to with: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Diamond Bar will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the City Hall of Diamond Bar, on or before the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. on the 18th day of February, 1993, sealed bids or proposals for the Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the Northerly Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Diamond Bar, California, marked, "Installation of Metal Beam Guard Railing Along the Northerly Side of Grand Avenue at Rolling Knoll Road". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not 1 less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, Suite 100, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion, thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of app by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor of subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint appren- ticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate; or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five; or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally; or 2 D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on anannual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with d be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Diamond Bar, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this Contract such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Diamond Bar for an amount equal to at least 10 percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, or certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. If the City of Diamond Bar awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be 3 applied by the City of Diamond Bar to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and a labor and material bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Diamond Bar for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor who is not licensed as a contractor at time of award in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto or to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Diamond Bar. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Diamond Bar on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall, Diamond Bar, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Diamond Bar and payment of $25.00, said $25.00 is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non -reimbursable payment of $10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Diamond Bar. Tn accordance with the requirements of Section 903 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Diamond Bar, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. 4 By order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California. Dated this day of , 1993. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City this day of , 1993. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting held on the day of 1993, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar California A AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.2 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE ORAL PRESENTATION TO BE GIVEN CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 8.1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 29, 1993 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: SELECTION OF BOND COUNSEL SERVICES FOR THE COUNTRY ESTATES SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SUMMARY: The City, as a part of its overall responsibilities for the financing of an assessment district to install sewers in The Country Estates, needs to retain a series of professional consultants to provide opinion and assistance in the preparation and sale of tax exempt assessment bonds. One of the professional consultants needed to accomplish the financing of an assessment district is a bond counsel. The City has received four proposals from: 1) Brown, Diven & Hentschke; 2) Jones Hall Hill & White; 3) Best, Best & Krieger and 4) Arter, Hadden, Lawler, Felix & Hall. The City Manager, City Attorney and City Engineer will be interviewing the four bond counsel candidates on February 2, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: A recommendation will be made to the City Council at its meeting of February 2, 1993. EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belanger City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 8.1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 29, 1993 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager TITLE: SELECTION OF BOND COUNSEL SERVICES FOR THE COUNTRY ESTATES SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SUMMARY: The City, as a part of its overall responsibilities for the financing of an assessment district to install sewers in The Country Estates, needs to retain a series of professional consultants to provide opinion and assistance in the preparation and sale of tax exempt assessment bonds. One of the professional consultants needed to accomplish the financing of an assessment district is a bond counsel. The City has received four proposals from: 1) Brown, Diven & Hentschke; 2) Jones Hall Hill & White; 3) Best, Best & Krieger and 4) Arter, Hadden, Lawler, Felix & Hall. The City Manager, City Attorney and City Engineer will be interviewing the four bond counsel candidates on February 2, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: A recommendation will be made to the City Council at its meeting of February 2, 1993. (A PACKET OF THE CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL IS AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL'S READING FILE) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes _ No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: J Terrence L. Belanger City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND DAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 7' TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 28, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Right Turn Overlap Signalization on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue SUMMARY: To further improve traffic circulation at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Grand Avenue, a right turn arrow signal for motorists travelling northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard and attempting to make right turns at Grand Avenue is proposed. This matter was discussed and approved by the Traffic and Transportation Commission on January 14, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the installation of a right turn arrow signal for motorists travelling northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard and attempting to make right turns at Grand Avenue. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: T/T Commission Minutes: 01/14/93 Vicinity Map 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Traffic and Transportation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A RFYVIEWED Y rNo errence L. Belanger Georg . We City Manager Interim City Engineer CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING.DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Right Turn Overlap Signalization on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue ISSUE STATEMENT Should the City consider the installation of a right turn arrow signal for motorists travelling northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard and attempting right turns at Grand Avenue. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve the installation of a right turn arrow signal for motorists travelling northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard and attempting right turns at Grand Avenue. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The costs associated with the installation is estimated to be $4,000, and will be funded by traffic signal account. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In order to decrease delay and to facilitate motorists turning right from northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard onto Grand Avenue, a green arrow that would "overlap" (operate concurrently) with the westbound left -turn phase on Grand Avenue was discussed and approved by the Traffic and Transportation Commission on January 14, 1993. This would allow the northbound right -turn vehicles to move during the northbound through phase and during westbound left turn phase. By increasing the amount of "green time" available to the heavy right -turn movement, delay should be reduced significantly. Potentially, this could also reduce the cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Drive, Country View Drive and Rolling Knoll Road. If the green arrow is implemented, it would be necessary to prohibit westbound Grand Avenue U-turns because of the conflict with the northbound right -turn vehicles entering the intersection during the right -turn arrow interval. This would inconvenience motorists who are accustomed to making the U-turn enroute to and from the shopping centers located at the southeast and northeast corners of the intersection. While the magnitude of the inconvenience caused by the U-turn prohibition has not been quantified by traffic counts, it is doubtful that it would outweigh delay -reducing benefits of the right -turn overlap. With the westbound U-turn prohibition, the following alternate routes will still be available for the current U-turn traffic: Page Two Right -Turn Overlap Signalization February 2, 1993 Motorists originating from westbound Grand Avenue and destined to the southeast shopping center (i.e. Vineyard Bank) - to turn left from Grand Avenue to southbound Diamond Bar Boulevard, U-turn at the median opening 700 feet south of Grand Avenue to northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard and turn right to the center. Motorists originating at the northeast corner (i.e. Ralph's shopping center) and destined to eastbound Grand Avenue - via a left turn from the center at the median opening on Diamond Bar Boulevard, 500 feet north of Grand Avenue, south on Diamond Bar Boulevard and left onto Grand Avenue. Motorists exiting from the northeast corner on Grand Avenue - to turn right on to Diamond Bar Boulevard and travel north to the aforementioned median opening, 500 north to the aforementioned median opening, 500 feet north of Grand Avenue and make a U-turn and travel back to Grand Avenue where a left turn is possible. It is also possible for motorists to travel west on Grand Avenue to the median opening, 600 feet west of Diamond Bar Boulevard and make a U-turn to eastbound Grand Avenue. The existing hardware and software are capable of providing the right turn overlap feature. The preliminary cost estimate for the signal modification is $4,000, including design and administration costs. The work required consists of the following: 1. Modify the pole -mounted signal head and mounting for northbound traffic at the northeast corner to add green and yellow arrow indications. 2. Add nearside five -section signal head for northbound traffic to existing pole at southeast corner. 3. Install two wires from the controller to the signals at the northeast corner and five wires to the signals at the southeast corner. 4. Replace the existing mastarm-mounted R73-5 sign for westbound traffic which allows U-turns with an R73-6 which prohibits U-turns. 5. Program the existing controller to activate the right turn overlap operation. PREPARED BY: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra January 14, 1993 page 8 nR A F T ftWrN%ff__% Drive from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Grand Ave., but amending the recommended sign to indicate "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" to be posted on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Gravdahl. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Right Turn AE/Liu reported that, pursuant to the Commission's Overlap request, staff presents for discussion the Signalization feasibility of installing a right -turn arrow signal on Diamond Bar for motorists traveling northbound Diamond Bar Blvd. at Blvd. and attempting to make right turns at Grand Grand Ave. Avenue. In order to decrease delay and to facilitate motorists turning right from northbound Diamond Bar Blvd. onto Grand Ave., the proposed green arrow would "overlap" with the westbound left -turn phase on Grand Avenue. If the green arrow is implemented, it would be necessary to prohibit westbound Grand Avenue U-turns because of the conflict with the northbound right -turn vehicles entering the intersection during the right -turn arrow interval. AE/Liu reported that the Commission had also considered the alternative of allowing right turns from the existing number two through lane in addition to the existing right - turn only lane. He reviewed several concerns (i.e pedestrian safety, truck safety, and through traffic impact) to this alternative, as presented in the staff report. VC/Gravdahl recalled that the Commission had made a recommendation, on this item, nearly 2 years ago. ICE/Wentz stated that the item appears to have been overlooked, however, staff is desirous to get the issue resolved, and to bring the Commission's recommendation to Council so that it can be implemented. It is staff's recommendation that a right -turn arrow be installed at the indicated location, to operate in a manner described in the staff report, and that the U-turn for westbound Grand Ave. be prohibited as part of the installation. C/Ury expressed his concern that pedestrians crossing at that location may hinder the traffic flow making the right turn. January 14, 1993 Page 9 DRAFT ICE/Wentz stated that the pedestrian count at that location is not high enough to significantly effect that turning movement. C/Ury stated that the westbound movement phase should be longer than the eastbound movement phase. Chair/Chavers requested staff to notice businesses of the proposed prohibited U-turn before the item goes to the City Council. Motion was made by C/Ury, seconded by C/Beke and Disc. of the C/Ury excused himself from discussion of the draft draft EIR for EIR for the South Pointe Master Plan because of a South Pointe possible conflict of interest. He left the meeting Master Plan at 8:30 p.m. Chair/Chavers recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 p.m. Chair/Chavers stated that the purpose of the discussion tonight is to give the Commission an opportunity to ask Hardy Strozier, the Project Manager, or Jay Nelson, the traffic consultant, any questions regarding the draft EIR for the South Pointe Master Plan. ICE/Wentz reported that staff has provided the responses received, from three of the Commissioners, regarding the draft EIR, to the Community Development Department, and the consultants for their review and comment. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's recommendation. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. ITEMS FROM ICE/Wentz reported that, though the Commission and COMMISSIONERS: the City Council did take action regarding the installation of a 3 -way stop sign, on Pathfinder Installation of Road at Brea Canyon, there had been discussion that a 3 -way stop there should be some coordination between this sign on particular effort and the Pathfinder Bridge Pathfinder Rd. project. However, the Pathfinder Bridge project at Brea has taken longer than anticipated. Staff is now Cnyn. Rd. prepared to implement the 3 -way stop sign, coordinating with the County any traffic control plans prepared for the Pathfinder Bridge project. Disc. of the C/Ury excused himself from discussion of the draft draft EIR for EIR for the South Pointe Master Plan because of a South Pointe possible conflict of interest. He left the meeting Master Plan at 8:30 p.m. Chair/Chavers recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 p.m. Chair/Chavers stated that the purpose of the discussion tonight is to give the Commission an opportunity to ask Hardy Strozier, the Project Manager, or Jay Nelson, the traffic consultant, any questions regarding the draft EIR for the South Pointe Master Plan. ICE/Wentz reported that staff has provided the responses received, from three of the Commissioners, regarding the draft EIR, to the Community Development Department, and the consultants for their review and comment. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. , TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. SUMMARY: In order to mitigate cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Drive, Country View Drive and Rolling Knoll Road from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Grand Avenue, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommended the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p. m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: T/T Commission Minutes: 12/10/92 01/14/93 Vicinity Map 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Traffic and Transportation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A REVIEWED BY: 1 Terrence L. B ger 'Geor We tzCity Manager City Engineer CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. ISSUE STATEMENT Install "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The costs associated with the installation is estimated to be $500, and will be funded by traffic control maintenance account. BACKGROUND Residents of the Rolling Knoll Road/Quail Summit Drive area requested the City to consider various measures in order to mitigate cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Drive, Country View Drive and Rolling Knoll Road. Among the suggested were the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. In addition, the installation of a "Traffic Signal Ahead" (W-41) sign on Rolling Knoll Road, in advance of the traffic signal located on Grand Avenue was recommended. DISCUSSION Observation during the recent construction of the Grand Avenue/Rolling Knoll Road traffic signal and knowledge of the street pattern confirms the existence of by-pass traffic. To mitigate the cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Drive, Country View Drive and Rolling Knoll Road, the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday". Page Two Cut -through Traffic February 2, 1993 signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue, along with a "Traffic Signal Ahead" (W-41) sign appear to be the most practical solution to deter the by-pass traffic. However, the prohibition of the right turns would also be applicable to the residents of the area. To provide a better balance between deterring bypass traffic and minimizing inconvenience to residents in the area, the following is recommended: * Install regulatory signs prohibiting right turns on Rolling Knoll Road and on Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. The sign assembly shall consist of standard R-16 (No Right Turn symbol) signs with the legend 4 to 7 PM, Monday -Friday. In order to alert traffic of the change, a panel identifying an effective date will be included providing a two week notice. * Request the Sheriff's Department to warn' violators rather than issue citations for a week after installation of the signs. * Request the Sheriff's Department to apply rigorous enforcement after the first week to gain compliance and ongoing enforcement as necessary to minimize violation. * Monitor the effect of the right turn prohibition, including residents reactions, for three months. * Maintain, revise, or remove the signs pending upon the three-month results/observation. Of the 146 residents who reside on Quail Summit Drive, Country View Drive, Rolling Knoll Road and Winterwood Lane, a total of 18 residents responded. Of the 18 who responded, 17 agreed with the right turn restriction. The 146 residents were notified that the City Council will be considering this matter on February 2, 1993 and are invited to attend this meeting to further express their opinions regarding this matter. PREPARED BY: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra RESOLUTION NO. 93 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING "NO RIGHT TURN, 4:00 P.M. -7:00 P.M., MONDAY - FRIDAY" SIGNS ON ROLLING KNOLL ROAD AND COUNTRY VIEW DRIVE AT GRAND AVENUE A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on January 14, 1993. (ii) At the meeting of January 14, 1993, the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the installation of the "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue identified in this resolution are appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends installation of said signs. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the City Council, provides for the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" upon approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by establishing "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m., Monday-Friday"sign regulation on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. 2. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" have been posted as required in Section 1 of this resolution. 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the Mayor to cause signs to be erected indicating where the sign are to be required. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , 1993 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: , 1993 by the ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar do ,� rs 1 •*� 4f x .,\ 8j8.2j4�,5p' J: a r ' \r7 p2 1 py W 1 >�.1 its �"R `, ad ' � � 4 � d/ r�' '•^,, 'JF j0 w S eq jra •w ? O ,6 .q ` �, boy a ar 3 t ° e (/F= ; c$ z)z � I '° ,1 c`' •0 s `°' \ ''org2 � Lt� sB's3 WIN 00 ju the 169 t� 4q ~• 3 98 ♦ 13's� zo: zol e o .. W 0 ��-�• + '+o o � s 9 0 ou � _ •,, _ m � 1R . ,Z, m _ � � a s p a7 J r �' 1, 'z1 et s ✓ 9 . � ; �7 _ + 03 OR i < 1>i+ • ,., as ., w . ,.. �" " C(0 ¢s • '? 9 a z co 0 2 i 'n fQr !zfi iz] o L •19 6 _: Q . �' - ti. .,. m 0 �a let ,� : i. .~ a 1"\ l.a n OD 220 itl 222 o M8 . e. w - ,•' '�0 '^ a. D ., ro m a. �,• - ��., 00 23 � 199 191 193 1921 100 u NIs, ,..o ,,yb • D I i ,a. V a s 91 189 IBB e 1 ,e ' fir `� ) M1 r.l 4 RoII�NG 19,01,. p Y 3 18W > ` _ + .a//�• fLi N•� � r Q�. {. ,1 D• •.3 x : ; ^ , N . .Q ' qy �� �• > W a r�' r 177 17, 1)5 176 177 !]8 17! 1 ! axOp •° F ,{ • N 'fie 167166 165 16, 167 162 161 160 e3 '8• ,6 "1. O•', � " v } , .o u• ,� i = 9 i a 9 q � I q3 ° • B � � . +r. av a' �i a SCO � A 1'O^r, 'uvh HILLly. °lce :•v a = a 6 B ,. —^1'1 '• (J l.. Yj 4` J, t'a'e r t Il.r („�Y 'c • ti' •' �o • / /m/ °' li� m I,e ' 1X 135 S, ISI 251 ESI • •� � '� V 7 'r a' \`{;.'•�--_._..� .p/ •ai> #/ � '. 121 021 fill 81l 96! ••, > m , y�\` a. .a• 11)� > p , ~ 17 T .G.41 a• G2 2 t b 4.� '' e 4G4BJ 3 6 .�-.,• _ 'w,'. 7 ,`SJS� O Z Owl b A �o m p` m y o gym r +• ] e 19 20 21 22 s ui7w -` s 3/ O ER 4, t��` +yG. , i •.> y`c ir.b my �°. ^y •3 d x x - Q ! A to `C(r `O or •,a ,0 Jy 36 35 „ %�� 10 ° ` •7 m ,& b ° ti� 4 tib y •` b ,� 3 y y t 9 ti 35379 v y W ; •. .:� ,MB 912- b m ,.,• ., a` � mob. �JO, ti y a F30 1' �• � i8-51 :01 901 , v \ �J, r •r, \ 29 '�i i9 O > J1 y r x kfs PC 100 m p) °p a . a 73:•i,, `, F 0 :DD n° 0 n � I�" `1 • N l � �� O J D SEE I, 1 � T x 5 R! 14 RS 76 $I - 56 r � �F,RR •y6 .. If w 7 l! 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 909-860-2489 • FAX 909-861-3117 W; January 26, 1993 RE: CUT -THROUGH TRAFFIC ON QUAIL SUMMIT DRIVE AND COUNTRY VIEW DRIVE FROM DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD TO GRAND AVENUE Dear Diamond Bar Resident: On January 14, 1993, the Traffic and Transportation Commission discussed the mitigation of cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Drive and Country View Drive from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Grand Avenue. This is to inform you that the Commission's recommendation to install "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Country View Drive and Rolling Knoll Road at Grand Avenue will be forwarded and considered by the City Council on February 2, 1993. The City Council meeting will be held at the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, at 6:00 p.m. You are invited to attend this meeting to further express your opinions regarding the proposal. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Tseday Aberra, Administrative Analyst, at (909) 396-5671. Sincerely, u�v Ge A W z, P. E. I erim,Ci Engineer GAW:DGL:ta cc: City Council Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Traffic and Transportation Commission GARY G. MILLER PHYLLIS E. PAPEN JOHN A. FOBBING DEXTER D. MacBRIDE GARY H. WERNER Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember RECYCLED PAPER January 14, 1993 Page 6 i U91AFST AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. None. None. Cut -through Chair/Chavers stated that staff has recommended traffic on that discussion, regarding cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Dr. Quail Summit Drive and the right turn overlap from Diamond signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., Bar Blvd. to be combined because the action of one may effect Grand Ave. the other. AE/Liu reported that the Commission requested staff to solicit comments from the Quail Summit Drive, Rolling Knoll Road, Winterwood Lane and Country View residents pertaining to the possible installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. Of the 146 residents who reside on the indicated streets, a total of 24 responded, of which only one resident was opposed to the right turn restriction. To provide a better balance between deterring bypass traffic and minimizing inconvenience to residents, staff recommends that at this time the Commission consider implementing the right turn overlap signalization for northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard traffic at Grand Avenue first. This will make the arterial street route more attractive and reduce the potential for bypass through the residential area. However, if the Commission does not concur with staff, it is requested that the Commission consider the recommendation of the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Ave., and the installation of a W-41 sign on Rolling Knoll Road in advance of the traffic signal at Grand Avenue. Don Lemly, residing at 1387 Rolling Knoll Road, pointed out that regardless of what is implemented on the corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., there will not be a significant change to the cut - through traffic because people have become habitualized to do so. He suggested that the time restriction be changed to 4:00 p.m.- 7:00 p.m., and that there be adequate enforcement. Karen Mahoney, residing at 23834 Country View Drive, expressed her opposition to the right turn overlap signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Grand January 14, 1993 Page 7 Avenue, and the "No U-turn" on Grand Avenue, because it would be very difficult to come out of Ralph's and come back into her neighborhood. She then expressed her support for the "No Right Turn" on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. Raul Medina, residing at 23852 Country View Dr., and Ken Klein, residing at 23812 Country View Dr., expressed their support for the "No Right Turn" signs. John Murphy, residing at 23742 Country View Dr., suggested making Country View Drive a cul-de-sac. Ken Klein stated that they have written letters, to the City, on April 7th, September 30th, and December 18th, 1992, requesting that their street be made into a cul-de-sac, but have never received a response. Jack and Wanda Tanaka, residing at 23805 Country View Drive, expressed their support for the proposed signs, or the cul-de-sacing of Country View Drive. They presented a petition of 35 signatures supporting the signs. Deborah Renegar, residing at 1386 Rolling Knoll Road, stated that the problem in their neighborhood needs immediate action, regardless of what is done at the corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Avenue. Alan Singleton, residing at 23467 Quail Summit Drive, expressed his support for the proposed signs, but suggested that the time restriction be changed to 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. because cut - through traffic continues past 6:00 p.m. Sgt. Rawlings indicated that, since there is no parking allowed on Grand Ave., the officer would have to enforce this on Rolling Knoll Road. It would be helpful if the officer could sit in someone's driveway so that they are less visible. Chair/Chavers suggested that staff discuss this possibility with some of the residents on the corner. Motion was made by C/Ury, seconded by C/Cheng and CARRIED to accept staff's recommendation regarding mitigating cut -through traffic on Quail Summit January 14, 1993 Page 8 DRAFT Drive from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Grand Ave., but amending the recommended sign to indicate "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" to be posted on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Gravdahl. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Right Turn AE/Liu reported that, pursuant to the Commission's Overlap request, staff presents for discussion the Signalization feasibility of installing a right -turn arrow signal on Diamond Bar for motorists traveling northbound Diamond Bar Blvd. at Blvd. and attempting to make right turns at Grand Grand Ave. Avenue. In order to decrease delay and to facilitate motorists turning right from northbound Diamond Bar Blvd. onto Grand Ave., the proposed green arrow would "overlap" with the westbound left -turn phase on Grand Avenue. If the green arrow is implemented, it would be necessary to prohibit westbound Grand Avenue U-turns because of the conflict with the northbound right -turn vehicles entering the intersection during the right -turn arrow interval. AE/Liu reported that the Commission had also considered the alternative of allowing right turns from the existing number two through lane in addition to the existing right - turn only lane. He reviewed several concerns (i.e pedestrian safety, truck safety, and through traffic impact) to this alternative, as presented in the staff report. VC/Gravdahl recalled that the Commission had made a recommendation, on this item, nearly 2 years ago. ICE/Wentz stated that the item appears to have been overlooked, however, staff is desirous to get the issue resolved, and to bring the Commission's recommendation to Council so that it can be implemented. It is staff's recommendation that a right -turn arrow be installed at the indicated location, to operate in a manner described in the staff report, and that the U-turn for westbound Grand Ave. be prohibited as part of the installation. C/Ury expressed his concern that pedestrians crossing at that location may hinder the traffic flow making the right turn. December 10, 1992 Page 4 the various entitlement documents, tentative tract maps, and so forth, and to help construct the various findings and statements that will be required by the Commissions, and the Council, as part of the planning process. OLD BUSINESS: AA/Aberra presented the staff report regarding the request made by a citizen for the installation of a Cut through "No Right Turn, between 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m." sign, traffic on on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Quail Summit Grand Ave., in order to mitigate cut -through Dr. from Diamondtraffic on Quail Summit Drive from Diamond Bar Bar Blvd. to Boulevard to Grand Ave. Grand Ave. Warren Siecke stated that the technique of prohibiting right turns during certain hours in residential areas has been effective in the past. Therefore, it is recommended that, initially, a "No Right Turn, between 4:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday" sign be installed on Rolling Knoll Road at Grand Avenue along with a W-41 sign on Rolling Knoll in advance of the traffic signal at Grand Ave. If motorists do begin to turn on to Country View Drive , off of Rolling Knoll Road, to access Grand Ave., then the same kind of restriction at the Country View Drive/Grand Ave. intersection can be implemented, if deemed necessary. AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury, stated that the residents were not notified of this proposed action because it was staff's understanding that the matter may be postponed to the January, 1993 meeting and discussed along with the matter of the right turn lane on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Grand Avenue. C/Beke noted that many motorists will get trapped within that neighborhood because they can get into the area but are not allowed access out. Chair/Chavers pointed out that cut through traffic is a learned behavior. Those using the route know the area, and will find out quickly that it cannot be used any longer. He inquired if a sign can be installed to warn motorists of the proposed restriction so that they do not get trapped and wander around more streets than necessary. Warren Siecke suggested that a warning sign can be posted at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Quail Summit Drive that indicates "No Right Turn at Diamond Bar and Rolling Knoll". December 10, 1992 Page 5 ` C/Beke pointed out that the "Local Access Only" sign at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Quail Summit Drive did not stop the cut -through traffic. He indicated that, normally, he would be opposed to this type of action, however, in this case, he concurs with staff because the residents will not want to, for the most part, turn right at those hours of the day. Mike Hemy, resident of Chino Hills, with an office at Fallow Field Dr./Diamond Bar Blvd., inquired if the signs have been requested because of increased accidents in that neighborhood. Chair/Chavers explained that there is a queue of 5 to 10 cars waiting to turn right from Rolling Knoll, most going to Chino Hills. There have not been any accidents largely because the children in that neighborhood do not play outside during the week because of the increase in traffic. Mike Hemy stated that he feels the traffic problem coming from Diamond Bar Blvd. on to Brea Canyon Cut-off Road heading towards Fairway is a much more serious problem than this residential problem in which no accidents have occurred. Chair/Chavers pointed out that the two situations are not the same. There are financial considerations for a signal on Brea Canyon Cut-off, Road and there are technical and legal considerations why a stop sign cannot be installed. Don Lemly, residing at 1387 Rolling Knoll Road, expressed his concern that if a sign is not also installed at Country View Drive, the traffic will just reroute to that street. He suggested that the time of the restriction be extended to 7:00 p.m. Debbie Renegar, residing at 1386 Rolling Knoll Road, stated that she had also requested, at the November meeting, that a blinking light be installed just before the Rolling Knoll Road/Quail Summit Drive intersection to warn motorists of the upcoming traffic signal. That same intersection needs to be restriped. She concurred that the right turn restriction signs need to be posted on Country View Drive as well, and that the time be extended to 7:00 p.m. She requested that the signs be installed as soon as possible and that the matter not be postponed to January of 1993. Warren Siecke stated that staff's suggestion, that the signs be as least restrictive as possible, was December 10, 1992 Page 6 so not to inconvenience the neighborhood anymore than necessary. Staff has no objection, if the neighborhood is willing, to accept those hours from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.. C/Ury stated that the matter should have been noticed so that further input could have been provided. It is reasonable to request that something be done to keep intrusion traffic out of their neighborhood. If the signs are installed, then he would recommend that there be a period of time to notice motorists of the upcoming restrictive signs. VC/Gravdahl concurred. C/Cheng concurred that the signs should be installed at Country View Drive as well because the street may become congested if placed only at Rolling Knoll Road. Chair/Chavers stated that, though he supports the restrictive signs, there needs to be more of an open forum notifying the public of this proposed action. Once the signs are installed, there will be an increase of traffic milling throughout the neighborhood for several weeks, which could upset a lot of residents. He suggested that staff contact the corner house, facing east on Rolling Knoll Road abutting up to Grand Ave., to see if they would allow a construction panel sign on their property for a couple of weeks to warn motorists of the proposed restrictive signs. Once the signs go up, the Sheriff Department would then issue warnings for the five-day period, and then issue citations. C/Beke, concurring with C/Ury that if, a sign is posted on Country View Drive , motorists may take a left turn during rush hour, at an unsignalized intersection, to cross Grand Avenue, inquired if there is a way to avoid that situation. He suggested that the sign be posted at Rolling Knoll Road first, and if there is a problem than change it to Country View Drive , with some advanced notice that there is no outlet there during rush hour. Chair/Chavers suggested that the item be tabled, with direction to staff to provide formal notice to the residents, and include a specific procedure as to how this process will occur, such as the posting of the large advance warning sign for a designated period of time, and the following kinds of restrictive signs to be posted, and their locations. December 10, 1992 Page 7 C/Ury suggested that a "Not a Through Street" sign be posted at Deer Crossing Drive so that the motorists could circle around, and eventually end up back down at Grand Ave. and Diamond Bar Blvd. There are alternate solutions, and a little bit more investigation should take place on it. He concurred that the residents should be notified. Don Lemly suggested that the signs be installed to see what the reaction will be. There will always be some objections to change regardless what is done. If an issue arises that cannot be dealt with, then the signs can be bagged until it is resolved. Debbie Renegar pointed out that they have come before the Commission with this issue a year ago. We are the people who care and who are consistently here year after year. She suggested that the signs be posted first to draw out any comments from the residents. Motion was made by VC/Gravdahl and seconded by C/Ury to request staff to give legal notification to the residents, with a specific plan included in that notification, to include Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive for the warning signs and the restrictive signs as recommended by staff, and brought back to the January, 1993 Commission meeting. C/Ury reiterated that the residents should be notified before a decision is made. Staff needs to investigate other alternatives because he is concerned that people will make a left hand turn at Grand Ave. and Country View Drive. There is probably a better solution than no right turns at both locations. C/Beke pointed out that a better solution is prohibiting a right turn on Quail Summit at Diamond Bar Blvd., however, the community may not want to live with that. There will probably not be a great demand for those residents to make that right turn during those hours. C/Cheng suggested a permit system to allow the neighboring tract to make a right turn. Chair/Chavers explained that a permit idea has been brought to the attention of the City Manager and the Council, and the response has been that the City is not in the position to fund such a program. December 10, 1992 Page 8 AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury's inquiry if staff can give notification in time to bring the matter back in January of 1993, stated that staff will send out notification of the proposed signs immediately. The Commission voted upon the Motion made by VC/Gravdahl. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Remove Parking AA/Aberra reported that, pursuant to the Restrictions Commission's request of November 12, 1992, staff on Colima Rd. has provided a site plan identifying the lane east of designations and street dimensions to study Lemon Ave. potential traffic movement conflicts on Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue. The owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe is requesting the removal of the existing "No Stopping Anytime" sign on the north side of Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue, and is requesting the consideration of a 2 -hour parking restriction sign in front of the shopping center in order to provide delivery trucks an area to load and unload, thus allowing smaller vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking lot. It is recommended that the Commission recommend to the City Council the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and install "2 -hour parking" signs in front of the shopping center. Charles Ricotta, residing at 20651 Colima Road, Walnut, owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, expressed his support for staff's recommendation. Sgt. Rawlings reiterated the Sheriff's Department's opposition to the continued expansion of time parking controls because of the difficulty in enforcement. C/Beke stated that there needs to be some striping to channelize the 36 foot area to protect motorists exiting the driveway, to include another through lane, and designate a right -turn only lane. Chair/Chavers, concurring with C/Beke, stated that he is not opposed to the parking scenario, but is uncomfortable that street is in an untenable position. Staff can take care of the channelization plan without bringing it back to the Commission. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.( TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager 27, 1993 MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of "2 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue In order to provide additional parking for delivery trucks tdowi h and ppe requested the removal low smaller SUMMARY. lot, Charlie's San vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking " signs at nt "No Stopping Anytime" signs on Colima Road east of Union all tion of "2 -Hour parking a current at signs, the current signs, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends the this location. RECOMMEND ATION: That the City Council consider, Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the removal of the " signs and installing of "2 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east o mon existing No Parking Anytime Avenue. S taff LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Reso Report _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Traffic & Trans rtation Minutes Sinin and Stri in Plan SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Yes X No 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed — by the City Attorney? Majority 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Yes X No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission) Traffic and Trans ortation Commission _ Yes X No 5 Are other ertd departments the following ted by the report? Report discusscussfol owng affected departments: N/A REVIEWED Y: Ter ence L. ger City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue ISSUE STATEMENT Remove the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and install 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and installing 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The costs associated with the signs, installation and signing and striping are estimated to be $1,000, and will be funded by traffic control maintenance account. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, located at the northeast corner of Colima Road and Lemon Avenue requested the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs in lieu of the current "No Parking Anytime" signs. The request originated from the need to provide additional parking for the business' delivery trucks for loading and unloading purposes, thus, allowing customers to maneuver easier within the existing parking lot. Additionally, the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends that a right -turn only lane be striped through the #2 traffic lane as shown on the attached signing and striping plan. PREPARED BY: Tseday Aberra David G. Liu RESOLUTION NO. 93 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CONSENTING TO THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING "NO STOPPING ANYTIME" SIGNS AND ESTABLISHING A "2 -HOUR PARKING" SIGNS ON COLIMA ROAD EAST OF LEMON AVENUE A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on December 10, 1992. (ii) At the meeting of December 10, 1992 the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the removal of existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs and the installation of the 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue in this resolution are appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends installation of said signs. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the City Council, provides for the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs upon approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by the removal of existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs and the installation of the 112 -Hour Parking" sign regulation on Colima Road east of Lemon Avenue. 2. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Stopping Anytime" signs have been removed amd the 112 -Hour Parking" signs have been posted as required in Section 1 of this resolution. 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the Mayor to cause signs to be erected. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of 1993 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of 1993 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar UeANo Famp L p4l T SoMPFI Ws*r^t�. " 914HT LAN -TibXK RouTe t4,A$r -MPU fkjcHlr To a&46v6jD AND 1�15-04LL- HOLRQ rlAkki�* 5roh.J fN17AlTips mow, ti- Jr (9) ARROW 1": 40' CIK eIP11-l_A?lm*ll� ex *XA (n IL Z2� -6, e- e G - D. 16.9,1 Li �7 1 fl, L6E,�vo : PEsp L fMlT = S��F . .� INSTALt-, "' R14HT LAN -MLCK PovTa MkST MARU RIGHTb �-( 90 (Ala-zk.) S/E1nJ - r S EXIS"���G "NO �oYPING To REMOvr=o A"D x,15--rAu- �� � FfDuQ fARKl�.ftg r� 5 INSTALL- TIPS 1 IV IQ' [R) ARROW �• _ _\ •\_ L 4"x 1_ ed cx�. E- ORIVE AfK-A0j EX. MVE Af".DA 4 PROP. 8t' wff1TE L14« �l _----'A�" ( WITH e-HEVROH CA03,5 HA'TO-0 70 fheZme �oPos�D 41�iN f � ;., � -,•-- ........._. �. Ota CC o l r r: December 10, 1992 page 8 AA/Aberra, in response to C/Ury's inquiry if staff can give notification in time to bring the matter back in January of 1993, stated that staff will send out notification of the proposed signs immediately. The Commission voted upon the Motion made by VC/Gravdahl. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Remove Parking Restrictions AA/Aberra reported that, pursuant to the on Colima Rd. Commission's request of November 12, 1992, staff has provided a east of Lemon site plan identifying the lane designations and street dimensions to study Ave. potential traffic movement conflicts on Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue. The owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe is requesting the removal of the existing "No Stopping Anytime" sign on the north side of Colima Road, east of Lemon Avenue, and is requesting the consideration of a 2 -hour parking restriction sign in front of the shopping center in order to provide delivery trucks an area to load and unload, thus allowing smaller vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking lot. It is recommended that the Commission recommend to the City Council the removal of the existing "No Parking Anytime" signs and install 112 -hour parking" signs in front of the shopping center. Charles Ricotta, residing at 20651 Colima Road, Walnut, owner of Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe, expressed his support for staff's recommendation. Sgt. Rawlings reiterated the Sheriff's Department's Opposition to the continued expansion of time parking controls because of the difficulty in enforcement. C/Beke stated that there needs to be some striping to channelize the 36 foot area to protect motorists exiting the driveway, to include another through lane, and designate a right -turn only lane. Chair/Chavers, concurring with C/Beke, stated that he is not opposed to the parking scenario, but is uncomfortable that street is in an untenable position. Staff can take care of the channelization plan without bringing it back to the Commission. December 10, 1992 Page 9 C/Beke stated that the channelization plan is to include a second through lane striped, the right turn lane striped, and stripe at least 10 or 12 feet out from the curb so that there is room to Pull out of that driveway and see around a truck. Charles Ricotta, in response to C/Ury, stated that the 2 -hour parking is needed for added parking for the customers, as well as for deliveries. C/Ury pointed out that even with a 2 -hour parking area, the trucks may still park inside the parking area. A loading zone may handle the situation better than a 2 -hour parking zone. Charlie Ricotta stated that a 2 -hour parking sign would allow parking for either customers or delivery trucks. C/Ury suggested that the area be left without the "No Parking" signs, and the employees should be instructed to park out in the street to let the customers have the convenience of parking inside the lot. This would probably promote less movement of traffic. C/Beke pointed out that the City does not want overnight parking of rigs on Colima Road. Chair/Chavers stated that since the owner feels that the 2 -hour parking would work, he has no objection to the recommendation made. However, if the 2 -hour parking does not work, then the owner should be responsible to pay for the next set of signs. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's recommendation, with the provisions that the #2 traffic lane, a right turn only lane, be striped through there, and that the lane be far enough from the curb so that the cars exiting the driveway can see around the parked vehicles. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Policy AA/Aberra reported that the Commission requested Statement that the current locations, which are served by for estab. adult crossing guards, be identified and ranked warrants for accordingly. Based on the counts of school adult crossing children, conducted during the week of September CITY OF DIAMOND DAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. F, 5— TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1993 FROM: George A. Wentz, Interim City Engineer TITLE: Installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, in front of First Mortgage Corporation SUMMARY: Based on a shortage of onsite parking spaces, employees in the First Mortgage Corporation building have been parking on residential streets such as Fallow Field Drive and Pasco Court. Based on concerns from residents in the area, the City Council previously took action to restrict parking. The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends the additional installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs directly in front of First Mortgage Corporation located on Fallow Field Drive. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, directly in front of First Mortgage Corporation and install up to 50 feet of red curbing at the intersection of Fallow Field Drive & Diamond Bar Boulevard and at Pasco Court & Fallow Field Drive and at driveway entrances to assure clear sight distances. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report X 'Resolution(s) Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Traffic & Transportation Minutes Vicinity Man 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Traffic and Transportation Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A RE E ED BY: Terence L. Ben er G r e A. City Manager In erim City CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. February 2, 1993 MEETING DATE! Council TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City City Manager Belanger, FROM: Terrence L. Monday -Friday" "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., SUBJECT: Installation of terly side of Fallow Field Drive, in front of First signs on the Mortgage Corporation ISSUE STATEMENT Friday" signs be installed on g:o0 a.m., Monday- of First Mortgage Should "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.- in front the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, Corporation. RECOMMENDATION approving the No. 93 -XX �p signs on the City Council consider Resolution Monday -Friday That the 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Corporation. installation of "No Parking, led easterly red curbing at the interse allow Field Driveand e side of Fallow Field d Drive in front of First Mortgage and install up to 50 feet o to assure clear sight distances. Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard and at Pasco Cour an at driveway entrances FINANCIAL SUMMARY200, and will The costs associated with the installs Ce aestimated to be $ccount be funded by traffic control maintenan BACKGROUND e "2 -Hour a e Corporation street frontage, on Friday" signs are presently p With the exception of First MMonday ns were installed to restrict Parking, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 Psco These sig Corporation Fallow Field Drive and Pasco court- employees of First Mortgage parking on residential streets by car-poolers. and carp building requested that three(3) o On December 10, 1992, First Mortgage Corporation req to be removed thesg e si ns located across the street ng the office building to allow for additional on-streetp DISCUSSION the Traffic and Transportation Commission sed this meeting On January 14, 1993, in the vicinity matter and the remaining signing are attached. Page Two Parking: Fallow Field Drive February 2, 1993 To solicit additional input from residents in the area, the attached questionnaire was sent to 50 residents in the immediate area. For the City Council's information, a summary of responses is included on the questionnaire. In general, the residents did not want to relax the restriction, rather, there was a desire to prohibit parking. The response was due primarily to the following factors: 1) The business complex should provide employee parking onsite; 2) This is the entry into the community; 3) Cleanup of litter is a concern, and 4) Street cleaning is difficult when cars are constantly parked in the area. The request by First Mortgage Corporation was based primarily on the tenancy out growing the original estimates of the number of employees in the building. The office building is 22,000 square feet. First Mortgage occupies 14,500 sq. ft. and the remaining 7,500 sq. ft. of office space is leased to various tenants. First Mortgage employs 70 to 80 employs (FT/PT) and has available a total of 71 parking spaces. Staff has met and discussed the need for First Mortgage to encourage carpooling and similar incentives to limit the number of vehicles. Based on the testimony, the Traffic and Transportation concluded the following: 1) That the existing signs should remain. It would still provide short term parking for clients of First Mortgage; 2) That the existing 112 -Hour Parking" signs begin at the first residence on the east side of Fallow Field Drive; 3) That the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs be installed in front of First Mortgage to limit carpool parking. This will provide approximately 6 to 8 spaces; and 4) That red curbing be installed at the intersection of Pasco Court & Fallow Field Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard & Fallow Field Drive for safety purposes. An additional concern from residents in the area is the impact of 2 -hour parking on their ability to park in front of their houses. Staff is evaluating the possibility of issuing permits to residents to allow them to park their personal vehicles in the area with no restriction. PREPARED BY: David G. Liu/Tseday Aberra RESOLUTION NO. 93 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING, 6:00 A.M.-8:00 A.M.,MONDAY- FRIDAY" SIGNS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF FALLOW FIELD DRIVE BETWEEN BREA CANYON CUT-OFF ROAD AND PASCO COURT A. RECITALS. (i) The Traffic and Transportation Commission considered this matter at a public meeting on January 14, 1993. (ii) At the meeting of January 14, 1993, the Traffic and Transportation Commission determined that the installation of the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, between Brea Canyon Cut-off Road and Pasco Court identified in this resolution are appropriate. (iii) The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends installation of said signs. B. RESOLUTION. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Section 15.20.010 of the Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted, by reference by the City Council, provides for the installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs upon approval of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that the public health, safety, and welfare will be best protected by establishing "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.- 8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" sign regulation for the easterly side of Fallow Field Drive, between Brea Canyon Cut-off Road and Pasco Court. 2. This resolution shall not become effective until the "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs have been posted as required in Section 1 of this resolution. 3. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar hereby authorize and direct the Mayor to cause signs to be erected indicating where the sign are to be required. PASSED, APPROVED and APPROVED this day of , 1993 MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1993 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar oe3tn 3 wet allonrfn s g 50 � 1p6 r0 LEGEND= �L� b. � j"j�U(VJWJ4IS� YNKY.�Ivb,b Ci, .enu�y . w s °° FRIDAY"516N5 ♦ EXISTING ` Z -HOUR PARKIN LrI 3"Q .32a SAM -5 PM, MONDAY - c FRi D Af 115tGN5 a • i ']''. o 44.f�r Se Ceo .,ys.43 p s,,�, o fe`� o+ e yc ta+o /'ri S 1, O� Vry pnJ y+ H97 y row C � r/� ,� •�. O 4�' �e Sb<Iy rrr` SS �4, G.4' Sero ;S' oma,+ +r 6 ti hsa 28+'► �• .� �,K 'x.,b CT , ro "(., z TS 30 a IST m, i0a r r ''. y o 0 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE - SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 917654177 9094860-2489 - FAX 909-861-3117 January 7, 1993 RE: Parking on Fallow Field Drive between Diamond Bar Boulevard and Pasco Court Dear Diamond Bar Resident: The Department of Public Works of the City of Diamond Bar would like to solicit your comments in regards to the existing 112 -Hour Parking, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Fallow Field Drive. The Traffic and Transportation Commission will be discussing this matter to assure that the signs as posted meet the intent of the Commission. It would be beneficial for the Commission to know how you feel about parking for this short section of Fallow Field Drive (as shown below). First Mortgage Corporation has asked that these three (3) signs be removed to permit parking along this section. All other restrictions would remain in place. We recognize that the response time is short, however, it is our desire to resolve this matter promptly. Please take the time to complete the attached survey and return it immediately. A stamped self addressed envelope is included for your convenience. The above matter will be discussed by the Traffic and Transportation Commission on Thursday, January 14, 1993. Should you wish to attend the meeting, it will be held at the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Hearing Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, at 6:30 p.m. If you are unable to attend the meeting or complete the attached survey, please contact Ms. Tseday Aberra, Administrative Analyst, at 909) 396-5671 with your comments. Si rely, o z Ge ge A. e t , P. E. v In rim C ngineer GAW:ta 1 EW cc: City Council cF57: s Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager Traffic and Transportation Commission i ee PASCO 13 ESS, ' r P ,• J GARY G. MILLER PHYLLIS E. PAPEN JOHN A. FORBING DEXTER D. MacBRIDE GARY H. WERNER Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember RECYCLED PAPER F' 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE - SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 9094860-2489 - FAX 909-861-3117 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SURVEY NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: My opinion about parking along Fallow Field Drive (on the slope side) between Diamond Bar Boulevard and Pasco Court is: Please check only one: SUMMARIZED RESULTS 9 Leave signs as presently posted. U Restrict parking to prohibit parking by car poolers. 4 Post no parking at any time. 3 Remove the three (3) signs to allow parking for that section of Fallow Field Drive. 2 Other (specify) COMMENTS: GARY G. MILLER PHYLLIS E. PAPEN JOHN A. FOBBING DEXTER D. MacBRIDE GARY H. WERNER Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember RECYCLED PAPER January 14, 1993 Page 2 V, 21® Deborah Wendoll, residing at 20559 E. Gernside Drive, concurred that there have not been any accidents in the past three years at this intersection, however, there have been many close calls. The other residents in the area could not make plans to attend the meeting on short notice, but they have indicated their willingness to submit a petition, if necessary. Jennifer Prince, residing at 1441 Fair Lance, Walnut, pointed out that the tennis courts have increased traffic in their area during the evening. C/Ury suggested that the foliage, on the corner of King Lake Drive/Gernside Drive, be trimmed to improve the line of sight. Sgt. Rawlings, in response to C/Beke, confirmed that Section 21800, of the California Vehicle Code, clearly states that at an intersection where one street tees into another street, the traffic on the street that tees must yield to the through traffic. VC/Gravdahl suggested that, since many of the residents were unable to attend the meeting, the matter be continued to the next meeting to allow an opportunity for further public testimony. C/Beke pointed out that the decision would be the same, based upon the facts presented by staff. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by C/Ury and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's recommendation, and to direct staff to investigate the foliage at that intersection, and determine what can be done to improve visibility. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, Cheng, VC/Gravdahl, and Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. OLD BUSINESS: "2 -Hour Parking ICE/Wentz reported that this matter is before the 8:00 a.m.-5:00 Commission in order to discuss and clarify the p.m. Mon. -Fri." original intent of the Commission as it pertains to on Fallow Field the three restrictive signs installed on westerly Dr. between Brea side of Fallow Field Dr., between Brea Canyon Cut- Cnyn. Cut-off Rd.off Road and Pasco Court. Mr. Clem Ziroli, Manager and Pasco Ct. of the First Mortgage Corporation, requested that January 14, 1993 0""' Page 3 LJRAF*rg the three 112 -Hour Parking, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Monday -Friday" signs located on the westerly side of Fallow Field Dr. between Brea Canyon Cut-off Road and Pasco Court be removed because employees of First Mortgage Corporation desire to utilize this area for parking. ICE/Wentz reported that the Department of Public Works received 18 responses, to the 50 surveys sent out, to the Fallow Field Dr. and Pasco Ct. residents soliciting their comments regarding the three signs on Fallow Field Drive, of which 9 indicated that the signs should remain as they are, and 2 indicated a desire to eliminate all parking restrictions in the area. C/Beke stated that the intent of the signs posted was to allow for visitor parking, and to keep carpoolers out of the area. This seems to have been accomplished. Mr. Ziroli should have adequate on site parking for his employees. ICE/Wentz, in response to C/Ury, stated that the signs are presently posted on the opposite of Fallow Field Dr., and begin again just near the first house on the First Mortgage side of the street. There is room for at least 6 cars to park on the First Mortgage side without restriction. However, carpoolers would also be able to park in that area. Bruce Norman, with First Mortgage Corporation, on behalf of Mr. Ziroli, distributed photos, to the Commission, of the front of the building to illustrate the area being discussed. First Mortgage does not have a desire to infringe, on the parking in front of any of the neighbors homes. However, there is an overflow of parking at the First Mortgage Building, and it is requested that parking be allowed on Fallow Field Dr., between Brea Canyon Cut-off Rd. and Pasco Court, across the street and in front of the First Mortgage Building, because it would accommodate about 15 cars, and it is not in front of anyone's home. Furthermore, since there are plans to expand on a lower floor of the building, additional parking spaces may be needed. Several suggestions, such as carpooling, have been made to the employees to reduce the amount of cars. He suggested that parking be allowed, in that area across from the building, Monday -Friday 8:00.a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with parking restricted before 8:00 a.m. to keep the carpoolers out of the area. January 14, 1993 Page 4 Heber Rodriguez, residing at 20920 Pasco Court, expressed his opposition to permitting First Mortgage to park along the west side of Fallow Field Dr. because it infringes on the appearance of their neighborhood, affecting their property value. Cars are currently parked all the way to Pasco Court, on the west side, creating a risk factor because visibility of vehicles approaching from Brea Canyon Cut-off Road on to Fallow Field Drive is blocked. Also, carpoolers arrive early and take the parking spaces immediately in front of the building to the second residence on the southside of Fallow Field Dr. because there are no signs posted in that area. He recommended that either the signs remain, or the residential area have a "No Parking" zone. Frank Barkowski, residing at 20920 Pasco Court, stated that the employees of First Mortgage Corporation are moving their cars a couple of feet rather than complying with the signs. Furthermore, the employees throw their garbage onto that slope area because they apparently feel no one owns that property. He suggested that the three signs, indicated in the staff report, be changed to "No Parking", and that the rest of the tract be restricted to the 112 -Hour Parking". Armando Samoncona, residing at 20940 Pasco Court, also stated that the employees throw their trash onto the slope area. He suggested that the employees park across Brea Canyon Cut-off Road, and that "No Parking" signs be posted in lieu of where the three signs are currently located. Lee Foster, residing at 20933 Pasco Court, stated that the signs posted need to include arrows indicating the direction of the parking restriction. He suggested that a crosswalk, or a signal, be installed at Brea Canyon Cut-off Road to provide a safe access for the employees to park in that area. Sharon Foster, residing at 20933 Pasco Court, stated that even though the carpoolers have been eliminated, the amount of cars parked in their area have not decreased, indicating that the cars are a result of overflow parking from First Mortgage Corporation. The 112 -Hour" signs should remain, or be replaced with "No Parking" signs because cars parked in that area block visibility. January 14, 1993 Page 5 DRAFT C/Ury recommended that the sign, on the east side, be moved to the property line separating the first home and First Mortgage's property, and that there be an arrow to designate the parking restriction. He also recommended that half the area on the other side be restricted to "No Parking", and half be restricted to "No Parking from 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m.". C/Beke indicated that he is opposed to removing the signs because the purpose of the 2 -hour time limit parking on the westerly side of Fallow Field Dr. was to help serve First Mortgage's visitors needs. VC/Gravdahl pointed out that, since some of the cars are parked at the end of the curb on Pasco Court, there should be red marking on the curb, giving sight clearance for those people coming out of Pasco Court. Chair/Chavers, in response to C/Cheng's inquiry regarding parking across Brea Canyon Cut-off Road, explained that the City does not want to encourage pedestrian traffic until there is adequate protection, and a stop sign is an inappropriate device for application in that area. Chair/Chavers stated that red curbing may be needed on the same side of the street as First Mortgage as well. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to install 2 or 3 signs, directly in front of First Mortgage's property, prohibiting parking between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., (for the purpose of keeping carpoolers out of the area), and to include arrows on the signs to indicate where the restriction begins and ends; leave the 112 -Hour" time limit parking restriction on the slope slide (which will allow for visitor parking); move the 112 -Hour" parking limit sign, that is currently located on the east side between the first and second residence, to the property line separating the first home and First Mortgage's property, to include an arrow on the sign indicating that the control point starts from this point up the street; and look at the curb returns at both intersections of Brea Canyon Cut-off and Pasco Court, and determine the appropriate distance it should be painted red. January 14, 1993 Page 6 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ury, Beke, VC/Gravdahl, Chair/Chavers. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None. Cheng, and- Cut -through Chair/Chavers stated that staff has recommended traffic on that discussion, regarding cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Dr. Quail Summit Drive and the right turn overlap from Diamond signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., Bar Blvd. to be combined because the action of one may effect Grand Ave. the other. AE/Liu reported that the Commission requested staff to solicit comments from the Quail Summit Drive, Rolling Knoll Road, Winterwood Lane and Country View residents pertaining to the possible installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -6:00' p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. Of the 146 residents who reside on the indicated streets, a total of 24 responded, of which only one resident was opposed to the right turn restriction. To provide a better balance between deterring bypass traffic and minimizing inconvenience to residents, staff recommends that at this time the Commission consider implementing the right turn overlap signalization for northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard traffic at Grand Avenue first. This will make the arterial street route more attractive and reduce the potential for bypass through the residential area. However, if the Commission does not concur with staff, it is requested that the Commission consider the recommendation of the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Ave., and the installation of a W-41 sign on Rolling Knoll Road in advance of the traffic signal at Grand Avenue. Don Lemly, residing at 1387 Rolling Knoll Road, pointed out that regardless of what is implemented on the corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., there will not be a significant change to the cut - through traffic because people have become habitualized to do so. He suggested that the time restriction be changed to 4:00 p.m.- 7:00 p.m., and that there be adequate enforcement. Karen Mahoney, residing at 23834 Country View Drive, expressed her opposition to the right turn overlap signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Grand Cheng, and- Cut -through Chair/Chavers stated that staff has recommended traffic on that discussion, regarding cut -through traffic on Quail Summit Dr. Quail Summit Drive and the right turn overlap from Diamond signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., Bar Blvd. to be combined because the action of one may effect Grand Ave. the other. AE/Liu reported that the Commission requested staff to solicit comments from the Quail Summit Drive, Rolling Knoll Road, Winterwood Lane and Country View residents pertaining to the possible installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. -6:00' p.m., Monday -Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Avenue. Of the 146 residents who reside on the indicated streets, a total of 24 responded, of which only one resident was opposed to the right turn restriction. To provide a better balance between deterring bypass traffic and minimizing inconvenience to residents, staff recommends that at this time the Commission consider implementing the right turn overlap signalization for northbound Diamond Bar Boulevard traffic at Grand Avenue first. This will make the arterial street route more attractive and reduce the potential for bypass through the residential area. However, if the Commission does not concur with staff, it is requested that the Commission consider the recommendation of the installation of "No Right Turn, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday" signs on Rolling Knoll Road and Country View Drive at Grand Ave., and the installation of a W-41 sign on Rolling Knoll Road in advance of the traffic signal at Grand Avenue. Don Lemly, residing at 1387 Rolling Knoll Road, pointed out that regardless of what is implemented on the corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand Ave., there will not be a significant change to the cut - through traffic because people have become habitualized to do so. He suggested that the time restriction be changed to 4:00 p.m.- 7:00 p.m., and that there be adequate enforcement. Karen Mahoney, residing at 23834 Country View Drive, expressed her opposition to the right turn overlap signalization on Diamond Bar Blvd. at Grand City of Diamond Bar Meeting Agenda For February 2, 1993 1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M. Litigation - Government Code 54956.9 Personnel - Government Code 54957.6 2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR MILLER INVOCATION: REVEREND MARK HOPPER, EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF DIAMOND BAR. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN MACBRIDE, FORBING, WERNER, MAYOR PRO TEM PAPEN, MAYOR MILLER 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 4. COUNCIL COMMENTS: 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: DRAFT 01/26/93 Page: 1 5.1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 8, 1993 - 7:00 P.M. AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 11, 1993 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.3 PRESIDENT'S HOLIDAY - FEBRUARY 15, 1993 - CITY OFFICES CLOSED 5.1.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 16, 1993 - 6:00 P. M., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 1993. 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - APPROVE WARRANT REGISTER DATED February 2, 1993 in the amount of $ 5.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - RECEIVE & FILE TREASURER'S Report for the Month of December, 1992. 5.5 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 10, 1992 - Receive & file. 5,-6' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: �6.1 REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23, 1992 - RECEIVE & file. x.6.2 SITE TOUR MASTER PLAN/STUDY SESSION/REGULAR Meeting of December 14, 1992 - Receive & file. City of Diamond Bar 01/26/93 Meeting Agenda For Page: 2 February 2, 1993 5.7 NOTICE OF COMPLETION - TREE PLANTING - - - l Artistic Landscape - Bob Rose !V c+ he o c- Csa�p W-6"— Tr � k- AV <- Recommended Actin: 5. 8 BOND-FrXQNEia ri i �v'� 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES ETC., 61 PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1993 AS YMCA MONTH - Jerry White with the Diamond Bar YMCA to receive Proclamation, 6 CERTIFICATES OF KDATION TO PATRICE HALSTEAD Suzanne Bradshaw, Hoshang Rastravan and Joe Ingram for their efforts in helping apprehend a robbery suspect at the Bank of America on Sunday, November 22, 199&2. 7. OLD BUSINESS: 7.1 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS AND CALLING FOR BIDS FOR GUARDRAILS ALONG GRAND AVE. AT ROLLING KNOLL - Engineering Recommended Action: L � vn-vv- 8. NEW BUSINESS: r--q i' RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCURE STATE BID FOR FLEXIBLE FUEL VEHICLES... Recommended Action: 8.2 BOND COUNSEL SELECTION FOR SEWER DISTRICT - Recommended Action: �n co m— 8.3 RIGHT TURN ARROW ON DIAMOND BAR BLVD. TO EASTBOUND GRAND AVENUE - Recommended by Traffic & Transportation Commission Recommended Action: RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Y OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING COUNTY INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN... Recommended Action: 8..5 NO RIGHT TURN SIGN AT D. T-B-QU&IL .� SUMMIT - Co�-n City of Diamond Bar Meeting Agenda For February 2, 1993 Recommended Action: 01/26/93 Page: 3 8.6 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF 112 -HOUR PARKING" SIGNS ON COLIMA ROAD EAST OF LEMON AVENUE - In order to provide additional parking for delivery trucks to load and unload and allow smaller vehicles to maneuver easier within the current parking lot, Charlie's Sandwich Shoppe requested the removal of the current "No Stopping Anytime" signs on Colima Rd. east of Lemon Ave. In lieu of the current signs, the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommends the installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs at this location. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving installation of 112 -Hour Parking" signs on Colima Rd. east of Lemon Ave. 8.7 RESOLUTION NO. 93 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF "NO PARKING, 6:00 A.M. - 8:00 A.M., MONDAY -FRIDAY," SIGNS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF FALLOWFIELD DRIVE IN FRONT OF FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION - Shortage of parking space has required employees of First Mortgage Corp. to park on residential streets such as Fallowfield Dr. and Pasco Ct. Objection from residents from these streets has limited employees from parking in front of the office building. In order to restrict this area from parking by car-poolers, the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommends the installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs directly in front of First Mortgage Corp. located on Fallowfield. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 93 -XX approving the installation of "No Parking, 6:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m., Monday -Friday" signs on the easterly side of Fallowfield Dr., directly in front of First Mortgage Corp. 8.8 SOLID WASTE HAULING - REPORT ON FIRMS THAT HAVE not complied and letters of termination from Haulers 6(f5 -unprepared to comply with the contract. -7,2, Recommended Action: 9. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER as matters can be heard. 9.1 CDBG ALLOCATION OF FUNDS - Recommended Action: City of Diamond Bar 01/26/93 Meeting Agenda For Page: 4 February 2, 1993 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: INDUSTRY ATTEMPTING TO TRASH YOUR FUTURE! Behind the residents (West side) of North Diamond Bar and the East side of Walnut, the City of Industry is proposing the largest MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY and TRASH -BY -RAIL FACILITY in the United States! They call it a MRF (nickname "murf"). This facility would be known as both a "MEGA -MRF" and a "DIRTY MRF" because of its proposed size and the fact it would receive RAW REFUSE! That all the trash from trash cans and dumpsters, all DUMPED ONTO THE FLOOR OF AN OPEN SORTING BUILDING TO SEPARATE THE RAW REFUSE FROM THE RECYCLABLES AND HAZARDOUS WASTE. The unusable garbage would be shipped by truck or rail to landfills and the recyclables hauled away ...... ALL TAKING PLACE RIGHT IN OUR BACK YARDS! THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1/4 OF A MILE FROM HOMES AND THE YMCA IN DIAMOND BAR! ACTUALLY, 700 FEET AT ONE POINT! Here are the FACTS - taken from the EIR (Environmental Impact Report), articles in the Los Angeles Times (Thursday, April 30, 1992), Tribune (Thursday, June 25, 1992 and Tuesday, January 19, 1993): * PROJECT BEING CALLED A MRF WITH NO EMPHASIS ON THE FACT THAT IT IS A FUTURE "TRASH/WASTE-BY-RAIL FACILITY". THE FIRST AND LARGEST OF ITS KIND IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, THE UNITED STATES, AND POSSIBLY THE WORLD! * THIS FACILITY WOULD BE OPEN SEVEN (7) DAYS A WEEK, AND OPERATE SIX (6) DAYS A WEEK, 24 (TWENTY FOUR) HOURS A DAY, MONDAY THRU SATURDAY! THIS FACILITY WOULD ACCEPT TRASH 16 HOURS A DAY ON THOSE DAYS! IT WOULD OPERATE FOR EIGHT (8) HOURS ON SUNDAYS! * THERE WOULD BE 827 (EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN) INCOMING, TRASH -LADEN TRUCKS DELIVERING WASTE PER DAY! THERE WOULD BE 284 (TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FOUR) LARGER TRUCKS HAULING THE RAW WASTE, RECYCLABLES, AND HAZARDOUS WASTE OUT PER DAY! * THE DAILY CAPACITY OF THE FACILITY IS 5,700 TONS OF RAW REFUSE A DAY! THAT FIVE THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED TONS! ANOTHER WAY TO PUT IT IS 11,400,000 (ELEVEN MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS PER DAY! IT WOULD BE CAPABLE OF HANDLING OVER 100. (ONE HUNDRED +) TRASH -LADEN TRUCKS PER HOUR DURING PEAK TIMES. * YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SMELL IT! THE FACILITY WOULD BE OPENED -UP OVER 16 HOURS A DAY WHILE ACCEPTING/SORTING GARBAGE! WHEN IS THE LAST TIME YOU GOT A "WIFF" OF AN OPEN GARBAGE CAN?! TRY 5,700 TONS BEING SORTED OUT ON THE FLOOR IN AN OPEN SORTING BUILDING BEHIND YOU! * YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO FEEL IT! IN THE FORM OF INCREASED SMOG - THE EIR STATES THAT 'THE EMISSIONS WILL EXCEED THE SCAQMD THRESHOLD LEVELS" AND "ANY DEVELOPEMENT IN THIS REGION WILL CONTRIBUTE TO A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO SMOG". THE EIR STATES ITS "UNAVOIDABLE"! AND THE DIRT, DUST, SMOKE, EXHAUST, AND SOOT FROM THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL MAKE OUR HOMES FILTHY! WHAT ABOUT OUR HEALTH?! * YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO HEAR IT! PLENTY OF NOISE TO GO AROUND - FROM THE SORTING FACILITY - CONVEYORS, EQUIPMENT, ETC., TRUCKS ENTERING, TRUCKS DEPARTING, EMPLOYEE AND VISITOR VEHICLES, ETC.! REMEMBER - YOU WILL HEAR NOT ONLY 1,111 VEHICLES TWICE (IN AND OUT, OR OUT AND IN), BUT THE VEHICLES OF EMPLOYEES, INSPECTORS, VISITORS, GARBAGE TRUCKS, HAULING TRUCKS, HEAVY EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO MOVE 5,700 TONS OF GARBAGE! AND DON'T FORGET THE EQUIPMENT IN THE SORTING FACILITY AND THE LOADING OF TRAINS AND TRAIN MOVEMENTS IN AND OUT! * YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO SEE IT! ITS PROPOSED FOR 40 ACRES AT THE FARTHEST, NORTH END OF INDUSTRY, AS FAR AWAY E -Aum T"M c=rr or =rrD%.rQw sr AS THEY COULD GET! THIS AREA IS CURRENTLY A BUFFER AREA'. AND IT WILL BE COMPLETELY ILLUMINATED WITH SECURITY LIGHTING AT NIGHT SO YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO MISS IT! THERE WILL BE NO NIGHT AT THIS FACILITY! * YOU MAY BE INFECTED -BY IT! THE OPPORTUNITY OF BECOMING ILL WILL BE GREATLY INCREASED - IF NOT FROM THE ODORS, SMOG, EXHAUST, SMOKE, DUST, DIRT, ETC., THEN POSSIBLY FROM PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS SUCH AS VIRUSES, FUNGUSES, AND BACTERIA THAT CAN CAUSE DISEASE, TRANSMITTED BY BIRDS, RATS, MICE, FLIES, AND OTHER ANIMALS AND INSECTS. THESE CAN BE FOUND IN SOILED DIAPERS, ANIMAL FECES, SPOILED FOOD, AND OTHER FORMS OF CONTAMINATED SOLID WASTE. RECYCLING FACILITIES PROVIDE A BREEDING GROUND FOR MICROORGANISMS. FLIES SPREAD IT BY FEEDING ON A CONTAMINATED SOURCE AND COMING IN CONTACT WITH FOOD OR DRINK. AND LETS NOT FORGET THE AIRBORNE MICROORGANISMS (AEROSOLIZED BY THE SORTING PROCESS). IT SURE ISN'T SOMETHING YOU WANT TO WORRY ABOUT EVERY TIME YOU SEND THE KIDS OUT TO PLAY, WORK IN THE YARD, OR HAVE A BAR-B-QUE! * THIS AREA IS CURRENTLY CONSIDERED A "BUFFER AREA" BETWEEN THE CITY OF INDUSTRY, DIAMOND BAR, AND WALNUT. IT IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND WHY INDUSTRY WOULD WANT TO POSITION SOMETHING AS "UNFRIENDLY" AS A "DIRTY MRF" BETWEEN THE RESIDENTAL NEIGHBORHOODS OF WALNUT AND DIAMOND BAR. AND BACKING -UP TO THE LANTERMAN STATE HOSPITAL FACILITY. THE ODORS, NOISE, DIRT, GLARE (FROM LIGHTING), TRAFFIC, SMOG, AND REDUCTION IN PROPERTY VALUES ARE A REAL CONCERN. YOUR HELP IS NEEDED TO STOP THIS PROJECT!!! THE ONLY WAY IS TO RESPOND TO THE EIR IN WRITING. ALL OF OUR LETTERS WILL BE INCLUDED, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, AS A RESPONSE TO THE EIR. THE LETTER MUST SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE EIR AND THIS PROJECT. PLEASE SEND LETTERS TO: ()g644,, tj4pc4 -3,199-3, Mr. John Ballas, City Engineer City of Industry (Their telephone number: P.O. Box 3366 818-333-2211 if you have 15651 East Stafford Street further questions) City of Industry, CA 91744 PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF YOUR LETTER AND SEND TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES ON THE ATTACHED LIST. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOUR CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL KNOW YOUR VIEWS AND OPINIONS ON THIS PROPOSED PROJECT. IT IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT THAT YOUR STATE LAWMAKERS KNOW HOW YOU FEEL. AND GET INVOLVED BY COMING TO THE ONE AND ONLY PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY OF INDUSTRY! YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A SPEAKER - JUST ATTEND TO SHOW THAT THERE ARE REAL PEOPLE - RESIDENTS OF DIAMOND BAR - THAT CARE ABOUT THEIR LIVES AND THE LIVES OF THEIR CHILDREN AND LOVED ONES. PEOPLE THAT WILL RECEIVE THE MOST NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. PUBLIC HEARING DATE: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1993 TIME: 8:30 `AM (YES - EARLY MORNING) PLACE: CITY OF INDUSTRY - CITY HALL (ADDRESS ABOVE) IF YOU WISH TO BE A SPEAKER, YOU WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES! FEEL FREE TO CALL YOUR CITY OR YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THE EIR IS AVAILABLE AT THE CITY FOR REVIEW. A LOAN COPY HAS BEEN MADE BY CITIZENS THAT ARE HANDLING THIS NOTICE AND THE PETITIONS. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21660 E. COPLEY DR. SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 909-396-5666 DEANE DANA LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERVISOR 1199 S. FAIRWAY DR. SUITE 111 ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748 909-594-6561 ASSEMBLYMAN PAUL HORCHER 325 N. AZUSA AVE. WEST COVINA, CA 91791 818-967-5299 SENATOR FRANK HILL 15820 WHITTIER BLVD, SUITE H WHITTIER, CA 90603 310-947-3021 THE ABOVE ARE FOR YOUR CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE REPRESENTATIVES. YOU CAN ALSO NOTIFY YOUR REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS, BUT IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT VALUE THAT WOULD HAVE AT THIS TIME. OTHER NAMES AND NUMBERS THAT MAY BE HELPFUL: HANDOUTS - PETITIONS: CURTIS (DAY) 909-595-1291 CURTIS OR KATHY (EVE) 909-860-5516 YOUR CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, AND ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER: MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN CITY MANAGER ASST TO THE CITY MANAGER GARY G. MILLER PHYLLIS E. PAPEN JOHN A. FORBING GARY H. WERNER DEXTER D. MacBRIDE TERRENCE L. BELANGER TROY L. BUTZLAFF CITY OF WALNUT: MR. JACK YOSHINO, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT 909-595-7643 DATE: Mr. John Ballas, City Engineer City of Industry P.O. Box 3366 15651 East Stafford Street City of Industry, CA 91744 From: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RESIDENTS Subjects PETITION OF NEGATIVE RESPONSE TO THE E I R CONCERNING THE MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) PROPOSED FOR INDUSTRY We, the undersigned, petition the City of Industry to withdraw the proposed siting of a Material Recovery Facility (MRF) less than one-quarter (1/4) mile from the homes in tracts located at the North end of Diamond Bar. Both the proposed or adjacent alternate sight (Benton) are unacceptable. We are opposed at any attempt to locate this type of facility immediately behind the homes of the residents of Diamond Bar. The very significant impacts of traffic, noise, air quality, odors, lighting (glare), rodents, microorgainsms, lower home values, and more cannot be mitigated. Please record our individual responses' to this E I R as TOTALLY OPPOSED. NAME (Please Print) SIGNATURE ADDRESS ----------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. �• TO: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 REPORT DATE: January 26, 1993 FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Assistant TITLE: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF 1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS SUMMARY: The City has scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and budgets for use of Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). The City expects to receive approximately $220,619 in federal funds as a participant in the 1993-94 Los Angeles Urban County CDBG Program. The funds may be used for a variety of Community Development activities which develop a viable urban community principally for persons of low and moderate income. The purpose of the public hearing is to solicit public testimony and receive presentations from public service organizations requesting funds prior to taking action on a final statement of program objectives. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and approve the proposed project and budget recommendation as provided by staff in the attached matrix and direct that these materials be forwarded to the Community Development Commission. EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed N/A _ Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? MAJORITY 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belanger J es DeStefano int Kellee A. Fritzal City Manager Community DevelopDirector Administrative Assistant CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: February 2, 1993 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF 1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS ISSUE STATEMENT: The City expects to receive approximately $220,619 in federal funds as a participant in the 1993-94 Los Angeles Urban County CDBG Program. The funds may be used for a variety of Community Development activities which develop a viable urban community principally for persons of low and moderate income, the elimination of slum and blight or address a recent and urgent health and safety need. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and approve the proposed project and budget recommendation as provided by staff in the attached matrix and direct that these materials be forwarded to the Community Development Commission. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: Approval of the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds will not have any impact upon the City's 1993-94 General Fund budget. Approval of the CDBG budget will be incorporated into the 1993-94 budget document. BACKGROUND: The Los Angeles Community Development Commission, through a Cooperative Agreement, administers the City's Community Development Block Grant Program. The City of Diamond Bar receives Community Development Block Grant funds based upon a formula which appropriates grants to cities in metropolitan areas that exceed a population of 50,000. The use of CDBG funds must meet the primary objectives of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The primary national objectives are: The project must principally serve low -and moderate -income persons, Eliminate slums and blight, or Address a recent and urgent health and safety need. The project must also meet eligible activity categories including: acquisition of real property for an eligible use; acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of public facilities; demolition and clearance of deteriorated buildings; community services for low -and moderate -income households; removal of barriers that restrict the mobility of elderly or handicapped persons; special economic development activities. And, finally, the project must address the community development objectives the City proposes to pursue. In February 1991, the City Council established requirements for determining funding eligibility for CDBG monies. Due to the April civil unrest, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) authorized an increase in the public service cap from 15% to 25% for the next five years for Los Angeles County and City. This years Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds will be the third year of the City's involvement in the Los Angeles County CDBG program. Page Two CDBG Allocation DISCUSSION: The planning process is underway to begin formulating project activities and projected use of funds for the nineteenth program year of Community Development Block Grant program funding. The City of Diamond Bar anticipates receiving revenue in the amount of $220, 619 for implementation of the programs. As part of the application process, the City must describe the programs which were implemented within the previous year and how those programs meet the goals and objectives that have been established by the City. PREVIOUS YEAR CDBG PROGRAM (18th Year) The projects funded for 1992-93 program are listed below, expenditures are based upon the actual money distributed to date with a projection of expenditures, where possible, by June, 1993: 1) Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA - Childcare (Budget $15,000 - Expended $6,197) This program is to assist low and moderate income families with afterschool childcare. The YMCA has assisted fourteen (14) children for the past five months. Based upon funding requests, the YMCA will expend approximately $13,447 of the budget CDBG funds. 2) YWCA - Y -Teen Program (Budgeted $4,500 - Expended $0) The program is targeted toward high risk youth and is a program that develops self-image, self-esteem and leadership in young girls. The YWCA has been unable to secure a site for the program. Currently the YWCA is working with Lorbeer Junior High School to secure a site. 3) Boy Scouts of America - Adventure Mountain (Budgeted $3,000 - Expended $1,310) The program was designed to bring 12 boys from lower income families not presently involved in scouting to an activity based camping experience. The Boy Scouts conducted the camp in July, 1992 with 5 boys taking part from Diamond Bar. 4) Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA - Senior Facility (Budgeted $1,000 - Expended $1,000) The program was designed to offset facility, rental and insurance costs for low and moderate income senior programs. 5) Heritage Park Community Center (Budgeted $354,942 - Expended $6,200) This multi-year project includes program development and construction of a senior citizen center. The senior citizen center is presently under construction. Through construction, approximately $250,000 of CDBG funds will be expended within this fiscal year. Construction funds available at the end of the current program year will be reprogrammed into the 1993-94 program year to finish construction. 6) Planning and Administration - (Budgeted $16,991 - Expended $5,500) This program is designed to provide for the general management, oversight and coordination of the CDBG projects and programs. Funds not utilized in the 1992-93 program year will be rolled -over into a contingency fund, which can be reprogrammed into the 1993-94 Public Works program. Page Three CDBG Allocation ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR FUNDING CONSIDERATION WITHIN 1993-94 PROGRAM YEAR The City anticipates receiving $220,619 in revenue for the 1993-94 program year. According to CDBG rules and regulations, the City may fund public service programs not to exceed a maximum of 25% of the program grant ($55,154), 10% in planning/administration ($22,061) and the remaining to public works requests, or 65% ($143,404). The funding requests are summarized in the following: PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS The City has received requests from four (4) public service agencies and two (2) City Departments for funding from the 1993-94 program year allocation. It is staff's recommendation that the City fund $48,100 in public services, out of a possible $55,154. The money not allocated for public services will be allocated to handicap accessible ramps in Public Work projects. Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA - Childcare (Requested $34,000 - Staff Recommendation $18,000) This program is to assist low and moderate income families with afterschool childcare. The YMCA proposes to assist seventeen (17) children monthly, during the school years. The YMCA proposed to increase the number of participants served from 14 children to 17 children. Staff recommends the $18,000 based upon the increase of participants. Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA - Summer/"Off Track" Camp (Requested. $11,6740 - Staff Recommendation $8,000) This program is designed to assist low and moderate income families with an opportunity to attend a summer day camp program, conducted from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The YMCA proposes to assisted sixteen (16) children monthly, during the summer months. In addition the YMCA will begin a new "off track" program at the local year round elementary school (Neil Armstrong School). The program will serve approximately 20 low and moderate income Diamond Bar children at Neil Armstrong School and the Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA. Boy Scouts of America - Adventure Mountain (Requested $5,000 - Staff Recommendation $3,000) The program is designed to bring boys from low and moderate income families not presently involved in scouting to an activity based camping experience. The Boy Scouts conducted the camp in July, 1992 with 5 boys taking part from Diamond Bar. The Boy Scouts proposed an increase to 20 boys for 1993- 94, however only 12 boys were identified last year for participation in the camp, the $3,000 will assist 12 boys to take part in the camp. YWCA - Y -Teen Program (Requested $5,950 - Staff Recommendation $3,000) The program is targeted toward high risk youth and is a program that develops self-image, self-esteem and leadership in girls. The program is designed to serve from 15 to 20 girls at weekly meetings. The YWCA has been unable to secure a site for the program. Currently the YWCA is working with Lorbeer Junior High School to secure a site for the 1993-94 program year. Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA - Senior Facility (Requested $1,000 - Staff Recommendation $1,000) The program is designed to offset facility, rental and insurance costs for low and moderate income senior programs. The construction of the Heritage Park Community Center should be completed in Summer, 1993. This program will have the Seniors meeting weekly at the YMCA until the senior center is complete and ready for occupation. The Seniors currently have 60 active members attending meetings. Page Four CDBG Allocation City of Diamond Bar - Emergency Preparedness (NEAT) (Requested $8,000 - Staff Recommendation $3,500) This program is designed to educate and encourage senior citizens to prepare for earthquakes by identification of hazards, elimination of such hazards and to help each other. The Emergency Service Coordinator would provide necessary education, training and materials. The program is aimed at reaching 500 seniors, targeting the Heritage Park Apartments. City of Diamond Bar - Senior Programming (Requested $11,600 - Staff Recommendation $11,600) This program is designed to conduct senior programming that will enrich the lives of local seniors. Activities would include information referrals, meals, dances and various classes. The program is designed to be conducted daily. It is anticipated that approximately 100 seniors would be served daily. PUBLIC WORK REQUESTS The City has proposed three projects that are eligible for funding from the 1993-94 program year allocation. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is a sweeping civil rights law which is intended to eliminate discrimination against people with disabilities in all aspects of American life. The Act requires that these barriers be identified and removed by January 26, 1995. In order to accomplish this the City has requested funding for two projects that will begin the barrier removal. They are Park Retrofitting and Handicap Access Ramps for compliance. In addition staff recommends that Heritage Park Community Building Furnishings and Equipment Fund be allocated monies. Heritage Park Community Building - Furnishings and Equipment Fund (Requested $32,750 - Staff Recommendation $32,750) The City proposes to furnish the Community Center with handicap accessible table and chairs, as well as other necessary capital equipment for operating senior programming. ADA Park Retrofitting (Requested $51,500 - Staff Recommendation $51,500) The City must comply with the new ADA requirements. As part of the requirements staff conducted an self evaluation report. The report noted several deficiencies within the parks. It is recommended that the deficiencies be addressed as a multi-year project. This year concentrating on park signage, improvements to Maple Hill and Starshine Park, re -painting parking stalls, drinking fountains and hardware replacement on doors and lavatory at all parks. The only funding source that has been identified for the retrofitting is CDBG funds. Handicap Access Ramps (Requested $112,000 - Staff Recommendation $66,208) As part of ADA compliance, street intersections must have handicap access ramps that comply. It is proposed that on major arterials, near commercial zones, be retrofitted with handicap access ramps (Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar Boulevard, Golden Springs Road). Although there is great need to retrofit all intersections, there are various funding sources that can be utilized to accomplish the ramps. Staff recommends that $66,208 be allocated towards the ramps, this would complete approximately 38 ramps. rage rive CDBG Allocation PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION Staff recommends that $22,061 be allocated for administrative costs and services, which is 10% of the allocated funds. CONCLUSION The purpose of the public hearing is to solicit public testimony and receive presentations from public service organizations requesting funds. It is an opportunity for the Council to question the proposed public service organization as well as City Staff regarding the applications under consideration. PREPARED BY: Kellee A. Fritzal Attachments: Notice of Availability of CDBG Funds Notice of Public Hearing Matrix of Applications and Funding Applications for Funding Requests PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 The City of Diamond Bar anticipates that approximately $245,000 in Federal Community Development Block Grant funds will be available for projects and program administration in fiscal year 1993-94. The City invites proposals for projects including public improve- ments, public services and housing rehabilitation. Individuals may suggest a project or program to be undertaken by the City or other eligible organization. Also, government agencies and community organizations may apply for funding for a project or program funded by Community Development Block Grant. All proposals must adhere to Federal guidelines which include meeting one of the following criteria: At least 51 percent of the persons or households benefitting from a project that serves an area as a whole, must meet low or moderate income standards. For a direct service, the activity must principally benefit low or moderate income persons or households with at least 51 percent of those most meeting low and moderate income standards. Conditions of slum and blight must be reduced or eliminated. Information on proposed projects must be submitted on forms provided by the City by January 19, 1992. For further information and application forms, please contact Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Assistant at (909) 396-5690 or come into City Hall located at 21660 E. Copley, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS 1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The City of Diamond Bar expects to receive approximately $220,619 in federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as a participant in the 1993-94 Los Angeles Urban County CDBG program. The City has scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and a budget for the use of the CDBG funds. The Diamond Bar City Council will conduct a public hearing on February 2, 1993, prior to their taking action to formulate a Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the 1993-94 CDBG program year. City Staff will present details of the proposed program and all interested persons will be invited to speak. STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS GOAL: To carry out the primary objective of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, to develop a viable urban community, principally for persons of low and moderate income. OBJECTIVES: 1. To develop a senior center to provide and facilitate an extensive menu of services and programs for Diamond Bar seniors. 2. To provide public services concerned with child care, crime prevention, health, drug abuse and education, among others. 3. To provide planning and administrative capacity to implement the City's CDBG program objectives. The program will be implemented to provide primary benefit to low and moderate income residents of the community. All interested persons are invited to attend the City Council public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 2, 1993. The hearing will be held at the South Coast Air Quality Management District located at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Additional details concerning any of the above information may be obtained by calling the City at (909) 396-5690. Kellee Fritzal Administrative Assistant Publish: January 19, 1993 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 19TH YEAR ALLOCATION - $220,619 PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS - 19th YEAR ($55,154) Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA School Year Childcare $34,000 $15,000 $6,197 $18,000 Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA Summer Camp Program $11,674 N/A N/A $8,000 Old Baldy Council - Boy Scouts Adventure Mountain $5,000 $3,000 $1,310 $3,000 YWCA of the West End Y -Teen Program $5,950 $4,500 $0 $3,000 YMCA - Senior Facility Rent/Insurance $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 City of Diamond Bar NEAT - Emergency Prepardness $8,000 N/A N/A $3,500 City of Diamond Bar Senior Programming $11,600 N/A N/A $11,600 TOTAL $77;224 $23,600 $8,507 $48,100 PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION - ($22,061) City of Diamond Bar CDBG Program Management $22,061 $16,991 $8,000 $22,061 Co.nting,enc.y $0 $5,097 $0 $0 30TAL $22061 $22,088 $8;000 PUBLIC WORK REQUESTS - ($143,404) City of Diamond Bar Heritage Park Community Bldg. Building funds $0 $354,942 $6,200 $0 City of Diamond Bar Heritage Park Community Bldg. Furnishings & Equipment Fund $32,750 $0 N/A $32,750 City of Diamond Bar ADA Park Retrofitting $51,500 N/A N/A $51,500 Maple Hill Retrofit $44,600 $44,600 Required Signage/hardware $2,000 $2,000 Curb Cuts for Starshine Park Parking stalls, re -painted $300 $600 $300 $600 Drinking Fountain Replacement $4,000 $4,000 City of Diamond Bar Handicap Access Ramps $112,000 N/A N/A $66,208 Grand Ave. - 18 locations $31,500 Diamond Bar Blvd. - 30 locations $52,500 Golden Springs - 16 locations $28,000 TOTA1,4 $190M40F, $35+1 942 $6`20© $150 458 GRAND TOTAL' $295 535 ;�t0#'v30 22 X07 $220,618 `!V1U4M DIAMOND BAR-WALNUT icallee Fritzal, Administrative Assistant City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765-417' Lear Ms Fri tzal, The Diamond Oar/Walnut YMCA is requesting Funding from the 1993 Community Development Bloch Grant Program to continue Financial assistance to low income Families that participate in our child care programs Zhe request will allow the YMCA to expand financial assistance From the 17 treat we prodded in 1992 to jn4i pro3ected for 1993. phis year we have also submitted an application For our Summer Day Camp program This program emphasizes outdoor 'camp -like'' Experiences while providing a safe positive atmoshpere For children The YMCA Day Camp operates during the traditional summer vacation and year round OFF Track periods from 6 30 am to 6.3 pm `Four Favorable consideration of this will help insure that quality, affordable cl-ild care will continue to be available in our community to families with the highest need. -"Mani:; you for your cont irrueo interest and support Sincerely, LZ4�1�_ err White 3iamond Bar/Walnut YMCA Branch Director 22600 SUNSET CROSSING • DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765 • (714) 860-0387 A BRANCH OF THE POMONA VALLEY METROPOLITAN YMCA CITY OF DIAMOND RAR- COMXUXITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.pRdGJAM;_ APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: I. Application summary Name of Organization JANIIARY 19, 1993 Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA Project NameLow-income Child Care Amount Requested: $34,000 Funding Location of Project - Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA and Golden Funds would be used to: Springs E1e. School Financially assist low-income childcare participants. II. General Information Organization Address 22600 Sunset Crossing Telephone(909) 860-0387 City Diamond Bar Zip Code 91765 Contact Person Jerry White Title Branch Director Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name Jerry White Title Branch Director Name Pastor William Hampton Title General Director Federal I.D. Number/Social Security Number (non-profit corporation): # 95-1641976 Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition X Public Service Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Planning/Studies Preservation Other (if checked (Construction) other: explain below) This request is for a new X existing program. (check) Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? Yes If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: MEC, F„ndr July 1992/July 1993, $15,000 III. Goals and Objectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) See attached sheet Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: See attached sheet Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). The City of Diamond Bar IV. Financial Information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. None III. Goals and Objectives Description of Project The Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA is a major childcare provider for the Pomona Valley and Walnut Unified School Districts. A total of 75 children are currently utilizing the services with 17% of them receiving some form of financial assistance. We anticipate this increasing to 20% in the next year. The YMCA offers varying degrees of financial assistance to those who cannot afford to pay based on verification of income and need of program. The increasing demand for financial assistance due to economic instability, escalating inflation and increased costs of running a state licensed program has put a severe strain on the YMCA. In the calendar year of 1992 over $151,000 was granted in financial assistance to Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA childcare participants. The childcare need for low income fames _. ilies is growing and becoming a critical need in our community. The CDBG funding would make it possible to meet the current needs. Purpose of Project Providing childcare for low income families helps solve several problems: 1) It allows parents of children to seek and maintain employment and or training which improves their quality of life and the local economy. 2) Childcare improves the quality of life for low income children of our community by providing them with a safe, supervised environment. The YMCA childcare program introduces partic- ipants to values education, physical fitness, and community service that they may not recieve at home. It also encourages participants to grow as a family unit by providing activities that include the entire family. In short, the YMCA childcare program provides positive role models, life enriching experiences and age apporpriate compan- ionship to those children who would otherwise be home alone. V. Program client profile Diamond Bar Total A. Clients served in previous year 85 100 B. Clients below low/moderate income 14 17 C. Clients expected in new year 17 D. Describe characteristics of client population in target area including age, sex, incomeNlevel, ethnic background and other specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. Our clients include children ranging in age from 5 years to 11 years old. These children are fromvaried ethnic background and income level. All clients must meet certain income criteria before being awarded financial assistance. I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. Signature 0Title Branch Director Name Je4 White Date 12-28-92 ATTACHMENT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET Organization Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES CATEGORIES FROM CITY OTHER S07RCES TOTAL Salaries & Benefits $ 16,620 $ 66,480 $ 83,100 Supplies 700 2,820 3,520 Rent 3.400 13,600 17,000 Communication 1 50 - -560 710 (caehaw, ao. c, «c) Travel Expenses 880 3,520 4,400 Insurance 2.680 10.720 13,400 Other 9,570 38,270 47,830 cam— v-ffr) ( food,license and permits, training, administrative costs) SUBTOTALS 534.,00 $135,970 r (A) TOTAL BUDGET $169,960.00 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROGRAM/PROJECT City of Diamond Bar Other Cities (specify) County or State (specify) Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising * see below Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) (B) TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME (should equal A): $34,000 $135,970 $ 169,960.00 * The YW-A has several fundraising events each year that help to off set administrative and building costs. However, the child care programs do not directly benefit frau the money raised frau these events. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 19, 1993 I. Application Summar► Name of organization Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA Low -inane child programing Project Name _ Amount Requested:$11,674.00 Location of Project Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA Funds would be used to: Financial assist low-incane Sumtner Camp program participants. II. General Information Organization Address 22600 Sunset Crossing City Diamond Bar Telephone 860-0387 Zip Code 91765 Contact Person Jerry White Title Branch Director Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name Jerry White Title Branch Director Name Pastor William Hampton Title General Director Federal I.D. Number/Social Security Number (non-profit corporation) : # 95-1641976 Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition X Public Service Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Preservation Planning/studies Other (if checked (Construction) explain below) Other: This request is for a new X existing program. (dam Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? No If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: III. Goals and objectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) See attached Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: See attached Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). The City of Diamond Bar Iv. Financial Information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. none III. Goals and Objectivies Description of Project The YMCA Summer Day Camp program offers outdoor opportunities for school aged children in the Diamond Bar community. Day Camp opperates during the months of June, July, and August from 6:30 am. to 6:30 pm. Monday through Friday. Last year over 75 children were served each week. This year the YMCA is expanding Day Camp programing to include ''off track" periods at local year round elementary schools. Purpose of Project Providing financially assisted Day Camp helps to improve the quality of life for low income children of our community by providing them with a safe, positive environment. The YMCA Day Camp program introduces participants to values education, physical fitness, community service and a wealth of outdoor ex- periences they may not receive at home. It also encourages participants to grow as a family unit by providing special activities that include the entire family. In short, the YMCA Day Camp program provides positive role modles, life enriching experiences and age appropriate ac- tivities to those children who would otherwise be home alone. t V. Program client Profile Diamond Bar Total A. Clients served in previous year 80 95 B. Clients below low/moderate income 14 16 C. Clients expected in new year 16 19 D. Describe characteristics of client population in target area including age, sex, income level; ethnic background and other specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. Our clients include school aged children ranging in ages from 5 years old to 14 years old. These children come from varied ethnic backgrounds and econimic levels. All clients must be interviewed and meet criteria before awarded financial assistance. I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. Signature k �!� Title A'C7 Name Jerry White Date 1/18/93 ATTACHMENT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET Organization Diamond Bar/Walnut WCA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES CATEGORIES FROM CITY OTHER SOURCES TOTAL Salaries & Benefits $ 7,704.00 $ 30,820.00 $ 38,524.00 Supplies 490.00 1,960.00 2;450.00 Rent 1,120.00 4,480.00 5,600.00 Communication 20.00 80.00 100.00 (telephone, p"e, etc) Travel Expenses 800.00 3,200.00 4,000.00 Insurance 1,180.00 4,720.00 5.900.00 Other 360.00 1,440.00 1,800.00 (rluu spmsy) (snack costs) SUBTOTALS 11, 674.00 46,700:.W (A) TOTAL BUDGET $ 58,374.00 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROGRAM/PROJECT City of Diamond Bar Other Cities (specify) County or State (specify) Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) $11,674.00 $46.700.00 (B) TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME (should equal A)• $ 58,374.00 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Old Baldy Council 1047 West 6th Street, Ontario, CA 91762 714-983-4534 REQUEST FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CAMPERSHIPS FOR "ADVENTURE MOUNTAIN" For nearly 100 years, Scouting has been known for its strong youth proaams designed to build character, self reliance, patriotism, respect for the rights. of other, career awareness and citizenship. The Old Baldy Council was chartered in 1922 and has carried on a fine tradition of service to local communities including Alta Loma, Chino, Chino Hills, Claremont, Diamond Bar, Etiwanda, Fontana, La Verne, Montclair, Ontario, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, San Dimas, Upland, and Walnut. Presently over 10,000 youth are involved in traditional programs such as Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts, and outreach programs such as Career Exploring, In -School Scouting, and Scouting for the Handicapped. The Councils' Long Range Plan projects over 15,000 annual youth participating by 1996. It is clear that the Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America serves the community well. In the past year youth participating in Scouting has increased by 10.6%. The camping program of the Boy Scouts helps develop character, teach citizenship, and build personal fitness. When young men go camping together with positive adult role models, they have the unique opportunity to watch and learn from these adults without the usual distractions found in a busy urban environment. As a group, these boys become a closed community where each "citizen" has specific responsibilities that ensure the safety and comfort of the whole group. This experience helps them grow mentally and physically in a fun and exciting environment. In our goal of reaching a larger number of young people with a program developing values, the council is expanding a camp program called ADVENTURE MOUNTAIN. The program will bring boys lower income families not presently involved in Scouting to experience a positive influence on their lives through an activity based program (archery, crafts, aquatics, etc.) combined with the use of the Scouting patrol method where youth can take on leadership positions. We are pursuing camperships of $250 each to provide 20 boys in 5th & 6th grade from Diamond Bar a camping experience at our Holcomb Valley Scout Reservation. This camp is located in the San Bernardino mountains near Big Bear Lake. Applications will be distributed through the schools. Boys selected to attend will be provided with transportation and equipment as well as trained adult staff. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. avid E. Tate Development Director CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval.. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: I. Application summary JANUARY 19. 1993 Name of Organization Old Baldy Council, Boy Scouts of America Project Name Adventure Mountain Amount Reauested•$.5,000 00 Location of Project Holcomb Valley Scout Reservation Funds would be used to: provide outdoor camping experience to low income boys to help develop character, teach citizenship and promote fitness. II. General Information Organization Address 1047 W. Sixth St. Telephone 909/983-4534 Zip Code 91762 City Ontario Contact Person David E. Tate Title Development Director Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name David E. Tate Title Development Director Name Larry C. Abbott Title Council Executive Federal I.D. Number/Social Security Number (non-profit corporation) : 95-1656362 Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition X Public Service * Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Preservation Planning/Studies Other (if checked (Construction) explain below) Other: * for low income youth This request is for a new X existing program. (cvdo Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? Yes If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: $1250 in 199211993 funding cycle III. Goals and Objectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) See cover letter Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: See cover letter Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). N/A IV. Financial information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. L.A. Times, TRW ECHO, Bannerman Foundation, Anonymous Foundation, Claremont Kiwanis, CDBG - Montclair, Miscellaneous Individuals V. Program Client Profile Diamond Bar Total A. Clients served in previous year 5 75 B. Clients below low/moderate income 5 75 C. Clients expected in new year 20 125-200 D. Describe characteristics of client population in target area including age, sex, income level, ethnic background and other specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. Adventure Mountain is designed to build character & self esteem, teach citizenship, and promote personal fitness in young men in the 5th & 6th grades who live in low income families. I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. Signature L�Title Development Director Name David E. Tate Date 1-14-93 ATTACHMENT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET Organization 01 d Bal dy Counci 1 , Boy Scouts of Ameri ca ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES CATEGORIES FROM CITY 20 boys Salaries & Benefits 1,920 Supplies 1-650 Rent 700 Communication (telephone, pMfte, aa) Travel Expenses Insurance Other Admin. Support (Flue +-d'r) SUBTOTALS 900 140 400 OTHER SOURCES 3,840 3,300 1,400 1,800 280 800 11,420 (A) TOTAL BUDGET * Based on 60 youth, the minimum needed for program TOTAL 5,760 A ncn 2,100 1,200 17,130 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROGRAM/PROJECT City of Diamond Bar Other Cities (specify) see list on cover sheet County or State (specify) San Bernardino Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) $5,000 5,000 5,000 -0- 2,130 -0- -0- -0- (B) TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME (should equal A): NOTE: Since we only take youth for which we have committed funds, this total cost of program may change TV YWCA West End 12 January 1993 Mr. James DeStefano Community Development Department City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177 RE: 1993-1994 CDBG PROGRAM PROPOSAL Dear Mr. DeStefano: -3 600 N. Park Ave. Pomona, CA 91768 (909) 622-4432 i w Thank you for mailing our agency the information necessary to apply for the Community Development Block Grants. Enclosed is the completed application for the YWCA's Y -Teen programs serving the junior high school in Diamond Bar. I look forward to hearing from you shortly. Sincerely, Kathy Rogers Executive Director KR/me Enc. Serving the Cities of, Pomona, Diamond Bar, La Verne, San Dimas, Chive, Claremont, Upland, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga ardOntario CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING; All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 19, 1993 I. Application summary Name of Organization YWCA OF THE WEST IM Project Name ".Teen _ Amount Requested: $ 5,950. Location of Project Funds would be used to: Establish a Y -Teen club in a school in Diamond Bar, particularly at Lorbeer Junior High School (or at another school site ouL witn oarticlpants frau Lorbeer Junior High School). II. General Information Organization Address 600 North Park City Parona Telephone ( 909) 622-4432 Zip Code 91768 Contact Person Kathy Rogers Title Executive Director Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name Peggy Zimmerman Title President, Board of Directors Name Jerre Holland Title _resident -Elect, Board of Directors Federal I.D. Number/Social Security Number (non-profit corporation) : 95-2256070 Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition Capital Equipment Acquisition Planning/Studies (Construction) other: X Public Service Rehabilitation/ Preservation Other (if checked explain below) This request is for a new x existing program. (dm:k) Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? When a site has been established to serve Lorbeer Junior High students for FY 1992-1993, YWCA will receive $4,500 from Dimond Bar. If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: III. Goals and objectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) The %11CA of the. kVpst End proposes to establish a Y-Teenprogram for high risk youth (targeting low-noderate income families) at Lorbeer Junior High School to provide activities and experiences in a nurturing environment to reduce involvement in socially stigmatized behavior.(see attachments) Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: Involve at -risk youth in an afterschool activity to decrease involvement in activities that hinder positive wholistir dorelinment by offers g alternatives of cooing behaviors The Y -Teen program also addresses situations that put youth at -risk: being left alnna aftArcrhnnl, lark of ppcitive role models In a context other than school, lack of parental involvement, family problems, and low self esteem/image. i caa attanc�sicnf-c) Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). Youth enrolled at Lorbeer Junior High School represents families from the geographic boundaries of the City of Dian pnd Bad Iv. Financial Information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. MnnA with a 1 i rat�i an to they-Taco the �' P�rarri serving City of Diamond Bar. V. Program Client Profile Diamond Bar Total A. Clients served in previous year 0 0 B. Clients below low/moderate income 15 15 C. Clients expected in new year 20 20 D. Describe characteristics of client population in target area including age, sex, income level, ethnic background and other specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. The program design is to target low-4toderate ince families whose youth (girls) are enroilect at Me junior n-ign scHooT. WTUncuts or stereotypic conclusions in targeting at -risk teenagers/young adolescents, a iarge maiori jty or the cgrcx p cervi I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. signature Name Katherine Rogers Date January 12, 1993 ATTACHMENT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET organization YWCA of the West End ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES CATEGORIES FROM CITY OTHER SOURCES TOTAL Salaries & Benefits $ 3,770 $ 0 $ 3,770 Supplies $ 600 $ 0 $ 600 Rent $ 360 $ 0 $ 360 Communication $ 240 $ 0 $ 240 Mcphow. tee' de) Travel Expenses $ 120 $ 0 $ 120 Insurance $ 240 $ 0 $ 240 % istrative/Misc $ 620 $ 0 $ 240 M— V -Jr) $ 5,950 $ 0 $ 5,950 SUBTOTALS (A) TOTAL BUDGET $ 5,950 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROGRAM/PROJECT Y -Teen programs n each city is completely funded by CDBG. City of Diamond Bar $ 51950 Other Cities (specify) County or State (specify) Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) B TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME $ 5,950 ( ) (should equal A): CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL 1993-1994 YWCA OF THE WEST END Serving the Inland Valley Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Claremont, Diamond Bar, LaVerne, Montclair, Ontario, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, San Dimas, Upland Y -TEEN PROGRAMS: YOUTH -AT -RISK The YWCA sponsored T -Teen program is designed to service girls attending middle/junior high school girls (i.e. Lorbeer Junior High School in the City of Diamond Bar) who represent families from low to moderate income. Through participation, the targeted population will progress towards a development of a positive sense of self-identity and will be empowered through a combination of support systems and education. The girls involved in Y -Teens should be able to avoid gang affiliation, school drop-out, irresponsible and immature sexual activity, delinquency, suicide and substance abuse at a higher incidence than girls from similar backgrouns who have not benefited from Y -Teen experience. Y -Teen girls are directed and encouraged to become responsible and productive role -models in their work, school and family lives. Y -Teen programs were started by the YWCA of the West End in 1987; they have existed within the YWCA nationally since the 1930s. SCOPE OF PROGRAM Y -Teens is an after-school activity for middle/junior high school girls. Enrollment is offered to junior high school girls, ages eleven through fourteen. Boys may participate if additional funding permits. A male role model for the boys is required to conduct separate group discussions on issues of sensitivity and importance to the teens. The purpose is to provide alternatives to high risk activities in order to reduce the incidence of gang involvement, teen pregnancy, school drop-out, substance abuse, child abuse and other high risk factors. The Y -Teen program addresses those needs that research indicates must be met for youth to successfully complete the transition to adulthood. These include development of decision-making and problem -solving skills; assistance in developing healthy living habits and avoiding health deterrents such as pregnancy, substance abuse, depressions and unresolved stress; experiences to increase self-esteem; a sense of connection and commitment to the community and a means of connecting with family. Diamond Bar CDBG 01-12-93 page 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Y -Teen program is proactive, reaching out to vulnerable middle -junior high school girls "at -risk" hoping to work with them through these turbuluent years, diverting their energies toward constructive use, building a solid foundation to empower them with skills to protect themselves and their choices in order to become self -actualized individuals and productive citizens. The objectives are as follows: *To create an atmosphere of acceptance and safety so that each participate may communicate freely. *To acquaint girls with ways of becoming responsible adults. *To provide opportunities for girls to accept and carry -through with responsibilities. *To offer a variety of enriching experiences. *To provide opportunities for community service. *To encourage interest in social issues and public affairs. *To provide curriculum and activities that address the sic essential needs of youth that must be met in order to successfully transit to adulthood. The Y -Teen program utilizes a variety of resources to support these objectives. Some of these include the utilization of educational video tapes, professional speakers, field trips, community service projects, workshops, and "rap" sessions. The group meets weekly at each individual school and is led by a teen group leader who is provided by the YWCA. There is a school staff person who serves as a liaison/sponsor for each club. The group meeting consists of officers' reports (with each girl having an officer role), educational component and weekly discussion. In addition to the club meeting, the girls participate in community service projects allowing the girls learn to give back to their local community and developing a sense of connection to their community, funding raising and social activities. Clubs will be active in the summer. The summer component will offer the girls a chance to take various classes such as babysitting and employment skills. It will also allow the girls to increase their community service activities, while experiencing the world of work. Diamond Bar CDBG 01-12-93 page 3 ASSESSMENT OF NEED The junior high school stage of ages 11-14 is a transition period from childhood to adulthood. The period is often accompanied by risk-taking, limit -testing and challenges to adult convention. This transitional phase assumes that most youth step across the threshold into responsible adulthood. There are growing concerns that these youth -at -risk are creating a society -at -risk, a society unable to produce youth capable of meeting our future needs. The following facts about our youth have raised need for support: *Too many youth are engaging in risk-taking behavior (i.e. drugs and sex). *Too many are not progressing from adolescence to responsible adulthood. There are increases in high-school dropouts, unemployment rates, teen pregnancies, substance abuse. *Many youth are high-risk because of multiple unmet needs. A disproportionate number of poor and minority youth comprise this high-risk group of youth with multiple unmet needs. Research demonstrates that there are five essential needs that must be met for youth to complete the transition to adulthood successfully. *Youth should be able to read, write and to do math as well as exercise discrimination and demonstrate problem -solving skills. *Youth need assistance in developing positive health habits and avoiding health deterrents such as pregnancy, substance abuse, depression, and unresolved stress. *Youth are developed positively by experiences that strengthen self-esteem, enhance leadership skills and life skills. *Youth need a sense of connection and commitment to the community in order to fulfill a basic requirement of belonging. *Youth need to be encouraged by supportive and functional families. Girls growing up today are markedly different from their counterparts of less than two decades ago. Trends reveal that girls and many of their classmates might not complete high school, that drop-out from high school is a real issue. Young girls could be at -risk in a number of others ways. *Twenty-five to thirty-five percent of children will go home after school to an empty house and lack of supervision. *There is a likelihood that the young girl lives in a single -parent home. Diamond Bar CDBG O1-12-93 page 4 *Many diets put young girls at risk, consuming far too much saturated fat, salt, and cholesterol. *Increasing numbers of teenagers endanger their health through risky and reckless behavior, more specifically, sexual activity, drugs, alcohol, and cigarette smoking. *Suicide is the third most common cause of death of adolescents and young adults with accidents and homicide being the most common causes for this age group. *American girls 15 years and younger are five times more likely to give birth than all their peers in other countries. One-fifth of the births in this country are born to teenagers. *Girls not only find their bodies and overall appearance less satisfactory than do boys, recent research now conchides that girls have a lower self-image. Girls also feel less competent, less popular, and more afraid of success than boys. Y -TEEN CURRICULUM: PREPARATION AND PREVENTION THROUGH EDUCATION Responsible Adulthood Higher Education Success Work Relationships Self -Esteem Leadership Coping Skills Sexual Negligence (Pregnancy, Sexually Transmitted Diseases) Drop-out (Truancy) Gang Membership Suicide Mental and Physical Disorders (Depression, Eating Disorders) Substance Abuse (Drug and Alcohol) Racism Sexual Assaults (Rape, Incest, Date Rape) Environmental Awareness (Conservation, Recycling, Graffiti) ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVES Role as Office of Y -Teen Club *Facilitate the learning process of taking appropriate responsibility for actions/behaviors. *Develop skills of planning, problem -solving, decision-making, and time management *Enhance self-esteem and confidence *Develop leadership skills Diamond Bar CDBG 01-12-93 page 5 Weekly Discussion. *Expand social support systems through peer bonding and friendship *Enhance self-esteem, confidence, ability to cope with stress, stressful situations and with peer pressure *Develop values and utilize them to make successful life plans for themselves, including school completion *Develop health and avoid health deterrents such as pregnancy, substance abuse, depression, and unresolved stress *Promote self-reliance, empowerment of self and leadership by teen group leaders serving as role models Education: Curriculum Lesson/Activity Plan; Professional S ers} Special Activities *Gain knowledge and understanding in the areas of teen pregnancy, gang involvement, substance abuse, rape, self-defense, etc. *Develop health and avoid health deterrents *Develop a sense of empowerment *Choose with clarity decisions for life *Expose through vicarious situations/experiences which might not otherwise have an opportunity for participation *Broaden the youth's base of knowledge and experience through exposure as afforded by field trips such as to art museums Community Service *Plan and participate in service projects to the community as a club *Develop planning, problem solving and decision making skills *Instill compassion, generosity, ability to make a difference, and a sense of responsibility to contribute to society *Develop a sense of connection and commitment to the community Present Vocational/Emnloyment QpUuMMifif,,s *Motivate to pursue and complete education *Provide work maturity skills necessary to search for and maintain employment Parental Involvement *Develop steps toward becoming a functional family by encouraging families to support club activities *Enhance sense of support of youth by parent(s) through volunteer participation (i.e. Mother - Daughter Choices Class) Diamond Bar CDBG 01-12-93 page 6 TIMELINE February - March Meet with school staff to establish program March - April Conduct weekly program meetings at sites. Target initial goal of 15 enrollments per site. May Continue weekly program meetings. File first quarter report with documentation. June - August Implement summer component of program with combined sites. Target a participation goal of 25 regular members. File second quarter report with documentation. September Meet with school staff and continue school programs with 15-25 enrolled per school. October - November Continue weekly program meetings. December File third quarter report. Prepare application for CDBG submission. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVBLOPMBNT BLOCK GRANT'PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 19, 1993 I. Application 8umaKy Name of Organization DIAMOND BAR/WALNUT YMCA Project Name YMCA -SENIOR FACILITY Amount Requested•$ 1,000 Location of Project 22600 SUNSET CROSSING Funds would be used to: OFFSET FACILITY RENTAL AND INSURANCE COSTS FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME SENIOR PROGRAMS II. General Infornatfon Organization Address 22600 SUNSET CROSSING City DIAMOND BAR TelephoneA909)860-0387 Zip Code 91765 Contact Person JERRY WHITE Title BRANCH DIRECTOR Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name JERRY WHITE Title BRANCH DIRECTOR Name PASTOR HAMPTON Title GENERAL DIRECTOR Federal I.D. Number/Social Security Number (non-profit corporation): #95-1641976 Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition _X Public Service Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Preservation Planning/Studies Other (if checked Other: (Construction) explain below) This request is for a new XX existing program. (d-aJQ Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? YES If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: 92-93-#1,000.00. III. Goals and Objectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A LOCATION AND INSURANCE FOR LOCAL SENIORS TO MEET WEEKLY PROVIDING LUNCH, ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A LOCATION FOR SENIORS TO MEET, UNTIL A SENIOR CENTER IS BUILT. Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). CITY WIDE_ IV. Financial Information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. N/A V. Program Client Profile -Diamond Bar Total A. Clients served in previous year 200 200 B. Clients below low/moderate income 200 200 C. Clients expected in new year 200 200 D. Describe characteristics of client population in target area including age, sex, income level, ethnic background and other specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. SENIORS LOW AND MODFRATF INCOME OF VARIOUS ETHNIC BREAKDOWN I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. SignatureLCl - ,� )��� Title BRANCH DIRECTOR Name JERRY WHITE Date ATTACHMENT A COMK1WTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET Organization YMCA - SENIOR FACILITY ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES CATEGORIES FROM CITY OTHER SOURCES TOTAL Salaries & Benefits Supplies Rent $600 $600 Communication (tdepbow, pamse, Cw) Travel Expenses Insurance $Ann $400 Other (M-- sp-ifr) SUBTOTALS $1000 0 (A) TOTAL BUDGET $1,000 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROGRAM/PROJECT City of Diamond Bar CDBG Other Cities (specify) County or State (specify) Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) $1,000 (B) TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME (should equal A): $1,000 I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 27, 1992 TO: Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Assistant FROM: Phil Armentrout, Emergency Services Coordinator SUBJECT: Emergency Preparedness for Senior Citizens ------------------------------------------------------------------- The City of Diamond Bar encourages its Citizens to become prepared for emergencies, especially earthquakes. The senior citizen population of the City is particularly vulnerable to the effects of an earthquake. Seniors have many special needs to consider during emergencies. Many are non ambulatory and most require some type of medication for health reasons. The Neighborhood Emergency Action Team, (N.E.A.T.) program, is a self help program designed by the City to educate and encourage its citizens to help each other during an emergency, i.e. earthquakes. The senior citizens are a target group of this program. It is believed that the N.E.A.T. program would directly benefit the seniors of Diamond Bar. PA: ch CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COW(UNITV DEVZLOPXZNT BLOCK GRR]ir PROGRAX APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE: I. Apgliaation SUs ry Name of Organization CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Project Name J W4ro-8.000.00 ACTIONr :+ Location of Project .61 E. COPLEY D• 11 DIAMONDv Funds would be used to: EDU3= AND a •Oi;: r' SENIOR •,• w no- . TO •W_M FOR 11•Fr. M •.N OP EUVAIRDS, 51 NA_IC N 11. General Infornation Organization Address 21660 E. COPLEY DR., #100 City DIAMOND BAR Telephone 19091 396-5689 Zip Code 91765-4177 Contact Person PHIL At to Title IMU Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name MBY1bI1F.R Title mhvnu Name BE[ANMR Title CITY MANAGER Federal I.D. Number/Social security Number (non-profit corporation): Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition XX Public Service Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Preservation Planning/Studies XX Other (if checked (Construction) explain below) Other: SAFETY OF SENIOR CITIZENS This request is for a xx new existing program. (dB:k) Has program/project received past funding from the City of Diamond Bar? NO ' If yes, please identify the source, year and amount: III. Goals and obiectives Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished with the requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) A. THE NEIGHBORHOOD EMERGENCY ACTION TEAM, (N.E.A.T), PROGRAM IS A SELF HELP PROGRAM DESIGNED FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR THE CITIZENS OF DIAMOND BAR, ESPECIALLY THE SENIOR CITIZENS.(SEE ATTACHED) Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: B. THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF THE N.E.A.T. PROGRAM IS TO HELP PREPARE CITIZENS FOR A LARGE SCALE EARTHQUAKE AND TO ASSIST EACH OTHER AFTERWARDS. (SEE ATTACHED) Identify and describe the geographic boundaries of the target area (attach a map, if appropriate). C. THE N.E.A.T. PROGRAM WILL TARGET THE SENIOR CITIZEN POPULATION OF THE CITY. (SEE ATTACHED) IV. Financial Information Please complete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. N/A V. prc Cli�rt U" A. Clients served 'in -previous year -Diamond Bar Total B. Clients below low/moderate income 50 50 C. Clients expected in new year 500 D. Describe characteristics of client 500 including age, sex, income level, ethnic background in tarea tother specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower inome sons• SRNTMOO_- I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the Cit will define other reporting rovisions and federally required a Signature assurances. Title EMn3DICy SEW CES COORD Name PHIL ARMNTROuT Date ATTAClD9M A SITZ DJl "opM? BLOCK ORMM pitOU" 11ppLICATI0 f PROV02no BODpsq' Organization City of Diamond Bar BSTIJMTaD BZpUDIMM S,�TEG RT�a Mu QTHER SOURCPS To T. Salaries & Benefits $5,0100.00 Supplies —0- 00 $20,.000.00 $000 0_0 Rent – - $3,000.00 Communication Travel Expenses Insurance --_ Other (Pbw vft*) SUSTOTALB (A) TOTAL BRDODT 8 000.00 X15,000.00 $23,000.00 ESTIXATZD RZVMQV aO=CZM VOR ,PSI• PROOJl118/pRoiz" City of Diamond Bar cDBO Other cities (sp"ity) GenPr-- 7 r i5nn' County or State (specify) Federal programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) (B) TOTAL BST'"TJM INCaM (should equal A); $23,000.00 ATTACHMENT B III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (Continued) A. The funds would be used to produce the materials including the binders and all related handouts• Funds would also be used to educate and train senior citizens through meetings and exercises. B. The State of California's Office of Emergency Services recommends that Californians have enough supplies to remain self sufficient for a minimum of 72 hours, (3 days). The N.E.A.T. program is intended to help solve this dilemma for senior citizens. The State's O.E.S. also specifically identifies senior citizens as a target group that needs special considerations. Refer to Attachment C. C. The main geographic area is the Heritage Park Apartments located at 23750 Highland valley Road and consists of 149 living units. The N.E.A.T. program will also be presented to other seniors living in the City through speaking engagements at the monthly senior citizens meetings. 1 ' �tllflrlfl Er404 M0111=11111 Planning Guide for Seniors Plan Major earthquakes can kill and injure thousands of people. Even moderate earthquakes can cause death, injury, and property damage. They also can seriously disrupt all of those things we have come to take for granted and to depend on for our well-being. Developing individual, family, and neigh- borhood earthquake plans can help you improve your chances of surviving an earthquake without injury or serious damage. Plan for family, friends, and neighbors to check on each other after an earthquake. (Telephones may not be working, so this should be arranged between people who live near to one another.) Maintain a list of your medications, allergies, and special equipment. Include the name, address, and telephone num- ber of your doctor, pharmacist, a family member, clergyman, or special friend. Take this list with you if you must leave Your home after an earthquake. Prepare Falling objects pose one of the greatest hazards in an earth- quake. Older people may not be as agile or as mobile as they once were, making it difficult or impossible to quickly get under a piece of heavy furniture such as a table or desk for Protection. Therefore, it is very important to eliminate haz- ards in the home that could fall and cause injury. If you cannot do these things yourself, ask a friend or family me u ber for assistance: • Securely anchor any medical equipment, heavy appli- ances, bookcases, chinacabinets, hangingplants, and o items. ther • Place heavy objects on low shelves. • Move beds away from windows. • Make sure doorways, halls, and exits are clear so that you may exit safely. • Add latches to cabinets and drawers to keep them from opening in an earthquake. Keep a 72 -hour supply of emergency food and water. Have I well -stocked first aid kit, flashlight and batteries, portable •adio, and essential medications. Protect Know where to go for protection when shaking starts. Find a safe spot in each room: under a heavy piece of furniture like a desk or sturdy table, against inside walls, or under sup- ported archways. If you cannot reach a safe spot, sit down or stay sitting where you are until the shaking stops. Cover your head with your arms. If outside, move to a safe spot away from buildings, over- head wires, and windows. Special Needs Many seniors have special needs. Taking the following ac- tions will increase your chances of riding out an earthquake safely: • If you use life support equipment, such as oxygen, have someone fasten the large tank securely to prevent it from falling over in an earthquake. If you use a wheelchair, walker, crutches, canes, or other types of mechanical walking aids, keep them near you at all times. If possible, have extra walking aids available in different locations throughout your home. • Place a security light in each room. These lights plug into any electrical wall outlet and light up automatically if there is a loss of electricity. They will continue operating automatically for four to six hours, and you can turn them off by hand in an emergency. • Have a whistle to signal for help in an emergency. • If you use battery-operated equipment, store extra batteries and replace them annually. • If your life support equipment requires electricity, buy an emergency generator. • Have a smoke detector and fire alarm system installed. If you have difficulty hearing, install a system that has flash - i ng strobe lights to get your attention. If you have a battery - Operated detector, replace batteries annually. • If you use a hearing aid, keep an extra supply of batteries with your emergency supplies. Remember to replace them annually. • If You wearglasses,keepanextra pair with your emergency supplies. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COJOMITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT -PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING All requests for funding are subject to City Council approval. Funding is contingent upon the projects eligibility under the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act as amended. APPLICATION DEADLINE:CRY 19 i9o� I • AODlioation yam,=,.., Name of Organization CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Project Name 19ENIOR PROGRAMING Amount Requested:$ 11,600 Location of Project 2900 BRE CANYON ROAD (HERITAGE PARK) Funds would be used to: CONDUCT SENIOR PROGRAMING THAT WILL ENRICH THE LIVES ,IF LOCAL SENIORS ACTIVITIES WOULD INCLUDE MLALS DANCES AND CLASSES. II• General informs}+�.+ Organization Address 21660 E. COPLEY DR#100 City DIAMOND BAR Telephone (909)396-5694 Zip Code 91765 Contact Person BOB ROSE Title 014421ITY SERVICES DIF&CM Officials authorized to sign contract and expend funds for applicant: Name GARY MILLER Title MAYOR Name TERRENCE L. BELANGER Title CITY MANAGER Federal • I.D. Number/Social Security corporation): N/A Y Number (non-profit Project Description (Check applicable category) Real Property Acquisition = Public Service Capital Equipment Acquisition Rehabilitation/ Planning/Studies Preservation (Construction) Other (if checked Other: explain below) This request is for a XX new existing program. (dam Has program/ project. received past fundinej from the City of Diamond Bar? NO If Yes, please identify the source, year and amount: N/A III. 49ais and Obise iv.. Provide a detailed description of the proposed program/project by describing precisely what is to be accomplished requested funds. (Attach additional sheets, with the if With �� DAILY SENI(ut OP -IN P1 — Up qp 100 SENIORS PER I]AY . IN DIAMOM BAR_ AQP AND_M= OF IM SENIOM OF SENIORS IN DIS MR_ CNDMT ORAL SERVICE BASED ON R Describe the specific purpose of the project, identifying the problems the project is intended to solve: BASS WILD. BE SPECMC Identify and describe the xgeographic boundaries of the tar et area (attach a map, if appropriate). g 9.4 D1, 11,x1 • •fir. IIP •, I iii •• 1; 1� 7 Please COMplete Attachment A - Proposed Budget. List other sources whom you have received funding during the past three years. THIS IS A NEW PROGRAM AND HAS NO PAST FUNDING V. Procran client Profile A. Clients served in previous year -Diamond Bar Total B. Clients below low/moderate income C. Clients expected in new year 100 PER DAY D. Describe characteristics of client including age, sex, income level, ethnicu background and in tararea specialized characteristics. Relate how the program/project will meet the federal requirement of benefitting lower income persons. SENIORS 55 AND OVER, VARIETY OF ETHNIC BACKGROUNDS (I.E. 20% ASIAN/AMERICAN, 60% CAUCASIAN, 20% OTHER; PERCENTAGE OF FEMALES SERVED SHOULD BE A LITTLE HIGHER THAN MALES. I hearby certify that if funds are granted to our organization they will be used to benefit lower income residents of the City of Diamond Bar. We understand that the formal agreement with the City Will define other reporting provisions and federally required assurances. Signature Title yvi err fj„�, Name DatejALA�� ATTACHMENT A COMMpMITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGP M APPLICATION PROPOSED BUDGET Organization CITY OF DIS g SMIQR PIaOG?N4qM ESTIMATED BXPENDITUREB CATEG_ pR ZZ FROM`_ OTHER SOi7Rc•Fe TOTAL Salaries & Benefits $8,600 Supplies$8,600 lit -Lo -0 Rent $3,000 Communication (Wkpbow, PeW+ie, ac) Travel Expenses Insurance Other BUSTOTALB $11,600 (A) TOTAL BUDGET $11,600 ESTIMATED REVENUE SOURCES FOR THIS PROORAX/PROJECT City of Diamond Bar Other Cities (specify) County or State (specify) Federal Programs Contributions Fund Raising Program/Participant Fees: Other (specify) 511,600 (B) TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOI[E (should equal A): $11,600 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: James DeStefano, Community Development Director FROM: Bob Rose, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CDBG FUNDS DATE: January 29, 1993 Due to ADA requirements, city parks require retrofitting of playgrounds and facilities to accommodate the disabled. Following are recommended funding levels for each existing park location. PAUL C. GROW PARK $34,300 Walkways $ 1,200 Si na e g g $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 HERITAGE PARK $33,100 Si na e g g $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 MAPLE HILL PARK $44,600 Walkways $ 1,200 Walkway Landings (2) $ 300 Walkway to Restroom Entrance $ 2,000 Drinking Fountain $ 2,000 Restroom Retrofit $ 6,000 Signage $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 PETERSON PARK $32,200 Retrofit door hardware on Concession Stand $ 100 Walkways $ 1,200 Drinking Fountain $ 2,000 Signage $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $ 8,600 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 RONALD REAGAN PARR $34,500 Walkways $ 1,200 Signage $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 Re -paint parking stalls (2) $ 200 SUMMITRIDGE PARR $40,700 Retrofit door hardware on Park building $ 100 Walkways $ 2,400 Drinking Fountain $ 2,000 Walkway Landings (2) $ 300 Replace dirt walkway $ 2,400 Signage $ 300 Accessible Playground Surface $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment $20,000 Re -paint parking stalls (4) $ 400 STARSHINE $26,700 Accessible Play Equipment and Surface $26,400 Curb Cuts (2 at $150.00) $ 300 SYCAMORE CANYON $58,300 Retrofit Restroom thresholds (4) $ 200 Retrofit Restroom sink handles (4) $ 400 Drinking Fountain $ 2,000 Walkways $ 2,400 Signage $ 300 Self closing fixture on classroom doors (2) $ 200 Accessible Playground Surface (2) $12,800 Accessible Play Equipment (2 sets) $40,000 Total estimated cost to retrofit parks per ADA standards is $304,400. It is expected that this would be accomplished in a ten year plan, completing approximately $30,440 of work per year. The first year goal would be more ambitious, including the following: All required signage in all Parks $ 1,800 Retrofit Maple Hill Park $44,600 All required door and lavatory hardware in all Parks $ 200 Parking stall re -painting $ 600 Curb cuts for Starshine $ 300 Replace drinking fountains (2) $ 4,000 TOTAL $51,500 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Kellee Fritzal I FROM: George Wentz �a SUBJECT: CDBG DATE: January 25, 1993 Per your request the following project is recommended as part of the CDBG application being considered: Installation of handicap access ramps at intersections on major arterials near commercial zones. Although this would not meet the need at all locations, it would provide key access to commercial areas. The following priority is suggested: Grand Ave.: 18 locations between Golden Springs Dr. and Rolling Knoll. Cost Estimate: 18 loc. @ $ 1750 each= $ 31,500 Diamond Bar Blvd: 30 locations between Cold Springs and Golden springs Rd. Cost Estimate: 30 loc. @ $1750 each= $ 52,500 Golden Springs Rd: 16 locations between Brea Canyon Rd and Diamond Bar Blvd. Cost Estimate: 16 loc. @ $ 1750= $ 28,000 Let me know if you need any additional information. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR SENIOR PROGRAMMING TABLES (all meeting ADA requirements) 6 foot tables $400 x 20 tables 72" Round tables $450 x 20 tables CHAIRS (all meeting ADA requirements) Padded, durable chairs $25 x 250 chairs KITCHEN EQUIPMENT Flatware, dishes Pot/Pans Coffee Pots, misc. supplies Total Total $ 8,000 $ 9,000 $17,000 $ 5,750 $ 5,750 $ 5,000. $2,000 $3,000 Total $10,000 . Grand Total $32,750