HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/02/1992CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Mayor —JaPh�IiNsEm. CMayor Pro Tem — Papen Councilman — John A. Forbing Councilman — Gary H. Wenner Councilman — Gary G. Miller City Council Chambers are kx:ated at: South CaastAir Quality Abwg&?vnt a sirictAuditodum 21865 East Copley DrAe MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 Robert L Van Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney MEETING TIME: closed Session - 5: 00 p.m. Lynda Burgess Regular Session - 6:00 p.m. City Clerk CopPes of staff reports or other writte" documeh atiort elating a aactt it 'referred fo arE Wt agenda, are on iiia ri ttre office of ttle;CitX Cleric and are available for public inspection if you h* astions r dirt ari en terut, base 00ritaCf tNe GterR at u - ' : d d lwaiffess !flilprR. ne Lmy or wamona Liar uses RECYCLED paper and encourages you to do the same. THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. 1. 5:00 p.m. - 2. CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: Next Resolution No. 92-28 Next Ordinance No. 2 (1992) CLOSED SESSION: Personnel - G.C. Litigation - G.C. 6:00 P.M. MAYOR KIM Section 54957.6 Section 54956.9 Councilmen Forbing, Miller, Werner, Mayor Pro Tem Papen, Mayor Kim 3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to Council. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1.1 Planning Commission - Tres Hermanos Conceptual Plan Presentation - June 8, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.2 City Council Draft General Plan Public Hearing - June 9, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.3 Traffic & Transportation Commission - June 11, 1992 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.4 City Council Meeting - June 16, 1992 - 6:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 5.2.1 Regular Meeting of May 5, 1992 5.2.2 Regular Meeting of May 19, 1992 JUNE 2, 1992 PAGE 2 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated June 2, 1992 in the amount of $500,293.68. 5.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April, 1992. 5.5 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 23, 1992 - Receive and file. 5.6 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY - Proposed Investment Policy for FY 1992-93. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX adopting the Statement of Investment Policy for FY 1992-93. 5.7 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 51079 AND AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-551: 5.7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51079 FOR A ONE (1) LOT SUBDIVISION AND THE CREATION OF 54 AIR SPACE UNITS AT 800 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - The proposed project is for conversion of a 54 -unit apartment complex currently under construction at 800 S. Grand Avenue to a condominium development. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX approving Tentative Tract Map No. 51079. 5.7.2 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89551 PERTAINING TO A 4.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 800 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution 92 -XX approving amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 89551. 5.8 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATION OF MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 91-2 AND APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 47851 AND 48487. 5.8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE' TRACT MAP NO. 47851 FOR A FORTY-EIGHT (48) LOT SUBDIVISION JUNE 2, 1992 PAGE 3 LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WAGON TRAIN LANE AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF WINDMILL DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - Applicants requested approval of a residential subdivision for development of 63 lots within SEA No. 15 and certification of a Master Environmental Impact Report. The Council held several Public Hearings on this application in order to receive public testimony and review the project. At the April 21, 1992 meeting, the Council directed staff to prepare conditions of approval and Resolutions for consideration. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution 92 -XX approving Vesting Tentative Tract 47851 and Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) 91-2. 5.8.2 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 48487 FOR A FIFTEEN (15) LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WAGON TRAIN LANE AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF WINDMILL DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 48487 and certify Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) 91-2. 5.9 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31977 FOR A TWENTY-TWO (22) LOT SUBDIVISION ON SIXTEEN (16) ACRES, LOCATED GENERALLY BETWEEN CROMARTY DRIVE, GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND LEYLAND DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX approving an extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 31977. 5.10 STORM DRAIN BOND EXONERATIONS - Exoneration of Bonds for Storm Drain No. 1668, Unit II, Tract No. 41350 (Montefino Drive) and Storm Drain No. 1890, Tract No. 42533 (Estoril Drive) . Recommended Action: Approve exoneration of bonds posted for a) Storm Drain No. 1668, Unit II, Tract 41305 in the amount of $6,700 and b) Storm Drain No. 1890, Tract 42533 in the amount of $8,000 and direct City Clerk to notify principals. JUNE 2, 1992 PAGE 4 5.11 STORM DRAIN REDUCTION FOR PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2021, TRACT NO. 36741 - The City desires to reduce the surety bond posted for Drain No. 2021, located on Tract No. 36741 (East Colombard Ln). Recommended Action: Approve the reduction of Bond No. 5293514 in the amount of $25,000 for Storm Drain No. 2021 constructed by Presley of Southern California. 5.12 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PORTION OF PATHFINDER ROAD WITHIN SAID CITY AS PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED THEREFOR AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - The proposed project consists of widening Pathfinder Bridge Overcrossing on State Route 57, modification of the southerly ramp terminals and traffic signals, and con- struction of a park-and-ride lot on the northeast quadrant of the interchange. In order to administer a cooperative project, County jurisdiction is requested from 1, 300 ft. west of Brea Canyon Rd. /Fern Hollow Dr. to Brea Canyon Rd./Fern Hollow Dr. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX consenting to establishment of a portion of Pathfinder Rd. within said City as part of the system of Highways of the County of Los Angeles; consider and approve the Negative Declaration for the Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project and park-and-ride lot and determine that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 5.13 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPOINTING A CITY TREASURER - The Government Code requires the City to appoint a City Treasurer and due to the recent change in management, a resolution appointing a new City Treasurer needs to be approved. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX appointing a City Treasurer. 5.14 APPROVAL OF CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT — Consideration of proposed agreement with the Law Offices of Markman, Arczynski, Hanson & King for continuing basic legal services to be provided to the City of Diamond Bar. Recommended Action: Approve the proposed agreement between the City and Markman, Arczynski, Hanson & King for basic legal services to the City of Diamond Bar as presented. 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC. JUNE 2, 1992 PAGE 5 6.1 PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING CITY MANAGER RECESS: Reception for Outgoing City Manager Robert L. Van Nort RECONVENE: 7. NEW BUSINESS: 7.1 INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. XX(1992) SIGN ORDINANCE - On August 20, 1991, the City adopted a sign ordinance prohibiting or limiting the use of certain types of signs within the City, among which are banner and inflatable signs. In an effort to provide a less restrictive policy, an interim ordinance is proposed to allow the use of banner and inflatable signs by permit in certain locations. The interim ordinance would be in effect for 45 days, at which time Council would make a decision regarding extension of the ordinance for an additional 10 1/2 months. Recommended Action: Adopt Interim Ordinance No. XX (1992 ) to allow the use of banner and inflatable signs by permit. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters can be heard. 8.1 PROPOSED BUDGET AND CIP FOR FY 1992-93 - Pursuant to State law, the City must annually adopt a municipal budget on or before June 30th. State law also requires that Planning Commissions must declare that proposed public works projects identified in the CIP are consistent with the General Plan being considered by the City. On May 29, 1992, the Planning Commission did, in fact, find the FY 1992-93 CIP consistent. Council has set a public hearing for June 2, 1992 to receive public comments regarding the proposed budget. Recommended Action: Receive public testimony and approve the proposed Budget and CIP for FY 1992-93, as presented. 8.2 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT/SOURCE REDUCTION RECYCLING ELEMENT - The City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) were developed in response to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and subsequent legislation. In addition, the Legislature enacted AB2707, requiring cities to prepare, adopt and implement a Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) which identifies how the City will properly reduce, collect, recycle, treat and dispose of household hazard- ous wastes. Pursuant to legislation, the City must hold at least one public hearing to receive testimony on the programs and policies addressed within these elements prior to final adoption. Due to an unanticipated delay JUNE 2, 1992 PAGE 6 in receiving the California Integrated Waste Management Board's written comments on the Household Hazardous Waste Element, the City must now continue the public hearing to June 16, 1992. Recommended Action: Continue Public Hearing to June 16, 1992 to provide additional time for integration of the Waste Board's comments into the final elements. 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Adjourn meeting to Tuesday, June 9, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. for General Plan Public Hearing and in honor of outgoing City Manager Robert L. Van Nort. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 8, 1992 TO: George Wentz, Acting City Engineer FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk SUBJECT: Grand Avenue - Construction of Wall At their regular meeting of June 2, 1992, the City Council considered materials submitted on behalf of residents of Gold Nugget Avenue supporting their request that a wall be constructed on Grand Avenue behind their homes. This matter was referred by the Council to the Traffic and Transportation Commission and the following materials are transmitted herewith: 1. Petition signed by residents of the neighborhood 2. Photographs taken of a recent automobile accident on Grand Avenue 3. Photographs taken of litter collecting in the area in question 4. Walnut Valley Sheriff's traffic collision report number 192-07511 regarding an accident which occurred on 4/28/92 in the vicinity of this neighborhood Thank you for your attention to this matter. Attachments (4) cc: Acting City Manager May 22,1992 RE C E! V zn City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 r% Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 " Attention: City Council Petition: Construction of a wall on Grand Avenue We, the residents of Gold Nugget Avenue, located parallel and below to Grand Avenue, are requesting a construction of a wall on the north side of Grand, for the following reasons: 1. Due to the tremendous increase in the volume of traffic since the opening of Grand Avenue, we are experiencing a lot of additional noise. The noise is specially disturbing during the morning hours, starting at about 4.30 AM during weekdays, and causing considerable deterioration of the quality of our lives. 2. Due to the extra traffic, we are exposed to a higher rate of accidents caused by downhill speeding cars. Some of the cars cross the north curb and walkway of Grand Avenue, and fall down the embankment, toward houses on Gold Nugget. We are worried, that it is only a matter of time, until one of the cars will struck a house, causing damage to property and injuring residents. Furthermore, there is a potential, that the impact of the car may cause an explosion, starting a fire, with catastrophic consequences to the the whole neighborhood, especially that majority of the houses have wooden shingle roofs. 3. Due to the increased traffic, there is substantially more debris on the slopes between Grand and Gold Nugget. The debris, laying on the City property, creates a negative, run- down impression of the area. All the above factors greatly reduce the desirability of living on Gold Nugget, which is evident by the number of houses for sale on our street. Construction of the wall should considerably improve the situation because it will create a physical barrier to the noise, to the falling down cars, and to the wind blown trash. The new wall should begin at the end of the existing wall, about 500 feet east from Cleghorn Street, and continue eastwards, to the top of Grand Avenue, to the beginning of the embankment. We will appreciate your prompt reply, and cooperation in this vital matter. Please address your answer to Nina Goncharov, 23631 Gold Nugget, Diamond Bar. Attachments: 1. Names, addresses, and signatures of homeowners and residents; 2. Photos from a recent car accident on Grand Avenue, when a car almost struck a house on Gold Nugget; I Photos of trash on the sloped area between Grand and Gold Nugget. Page 1 of 4 Name Petition: Construction of a wall on Grand Avenue Street Address Signature Gal¢ b noa6g old hA � N ----------------- --------------------------------- OIL------ ------------------------------OIL------ - 2q nD-�it L GL ------------ iL-------- - --�O 12 L/ - �v--- ------------ ��- ��Tf C-,�-rY I ------- ----- d 11%x- -- ---- Z9999 ---Z3999 �.---- _-------- 6014 N wl5t� -------- ____-- QfX4-w- IjAk7-3,J 11 J) f�j*# 04— ------ -------- - -- - --- _ y. -=-- -- -- ------ass--�------------- _Sim P e- - - - - - - - 'PAGE Z OF -i Petition: Construction of a wall on Grand Avenue Name Street Address Signature --------------------------------------------------------------- `' - -- mz ------ sem_--------- --------------------------------------------- — ---� t--- JjL ------------------------ ----------------- - ------ ---� fy _-- S on To ,q w ,r _ ' - ti USIA - -- G���—N --- '�-- — = MINI { n' -- 1��, �.q =— --- ------------------ -------- ---- 6a�aN�-----"� cj.� -- SLA.--- 2_-i_�-- -- � ------------------------- LI+xM� ��z� z -3s f o c v Nim , Pp,ct -3 v F k- Petition: Construction of a wall on Grand Avenue Name Street Address --- 6c�d-141 a�-Ab----------- ku (v(,Dt i~ -tt =- ------- _ - Signature PRA�AQIt vP)M pePdRo �3 '�'"-`d-------�3`?-��- °�� ku.t" !� -- -- -------- ---- --- T) j_ 1�1 L-----� �_? _�K�KsZ -� -------- MR 219 an ---'-___-___ F11 C pato •ttNtR 011Ms117 MMK Qa#rt Y Oa ,= comm" Vol" e1N/tTLftlrp atfpw YMYM ref. to New afat rtwrt rrr�r Mt awti rrTlwATt find lues a�aror+isr a rbtCLi er aieus W. rp�wcw �- IJ7waa Qa0""0once wort pian www» rMat PAM repaweet ttpom rrn ewuw►raaro wMArni ❑ ew► UN COLT twbt W CAr110t0 NY& OtTRItY TOtCLt MTIW 'rrpCasTtM Mrn 1/11011 NAPJRANZ CA r pONCT TRtnQ IB -L wta IIIHCA TOTH IeC , wla pnwsTMMMIwLf MCO RV TLwO 1�� pYC Olr .warm •�� wrlllain MWIrw Oves C wio O wA as Cl il% 11 016094 APR, 3 0 1992 ew on PAM 1 ( Qw un) an on wr►m OF CSA INSURED / WITNESSES / PASSENGERS �! "IMOF coump" TAN MGIC MIWq 0�11Cq LQ !!A Z- l -2-PI-7- 4 D o G 47S EXTENT OF INJURY ( "X" ONE) INJURED WAS ( "X" ONE) SAPMPAM s "LV M&T ~� ��T ML MAP. PATAL MVEM OTHO VWK! C011rLWR MANES S&%M gum •LIAR Of PANT OIVYl11 IA!!. MQ lI NW" Q"wn • 1TlA er°�ivFlslIPPLEMFNTAI ar INewENr/ woq •X ONE ' 9l ONE �NAMMTM �OOtIMIDN REPORT M/*tEAENTAL p 071[0! GTYICGUNTY/JUDICALDI FIW NCICNYYE[R TYPE WPILEMlNT"rX AMX~ Q YIIPDAT[ Q IMiMO01Ei MATwl" Z.Al a MAUL O LCIIOOLE{A W' 5.11 9,Z -i' 7 ❑ WrERUNYPDATE ❑ OTMM REPORTINGOWMO/FEAT CITATONNYNEER LOCATIONISULAWT ETA7EMKIM YAYRELATED rl YEa No 2. 3. 4. Xi! C dd /4 6. 7. " je A n F 7'' M"ArAr 0 A -/ 10. 40.X >-r- a`1 SCVCA M r4 _ KS MADIE t t. zs ,. 13. O r bi. c C. K 14. 3'� c L AJ 15. C / /L , e 4., 44AAM AL -1- 17. r Is. 3 19. Aox A -r rl4,C 0. -' 21. ON.C.AI 22. / ' L U 3. 4 Ki n�-- 25. 6. AJ Q /V 7. 28. 29. 30, 1. 32. OWISIDAYIVWN/ Y/Y C14P SN (RW. 41 IN.PNwa.Mfru�wMMOIMM ----- EE AEMT RAM T"WE/SUPPLEMENTAL . 7 DA of MICIpEMT/ocouytMu TMtI3m MGIC 9'd oFFIClM1. A - 47s11. -2y: -4' ,row RMAMRATWE ❑ SUPPLEWWAL `r 000Mi�rrrOCt y� -Ivp0w ❑\wm* T»t wnw�MrAlcr Ar�cA�e1 ❑ MUPDAT! ❑ FATAL ❑ MRiMUMUPDAT[ ❑ MRZA O"MATONALN ❑ .CIIOOLWA ❑ c"m CITYICGUNTY/AIDICALDtV CT MLPOIRIMOOIRTMICT/SEAT OrTATIONMUMEEM LOCATION/fUL*= STATENK MWAYMELATED rl YEf MO 1. n O/tit O ".s C t- V r a)./J : 2. 3. SL4 A4 94AKY 4. 6,gamo w ravue m/ z 6. 5 L G c I -ivy 7. A T/-1 hre- 7'Y 1A/ L s. O U- & UL A , w / C SS 12. 13e"Ae-f . Clef 14. ,s. IE ' P— o^- , s. G D 17. &f r l . /&I Uldt.A r / 2 s lG► 7 t (a caL 20. 21. � .-- 22. 3. T -LIE: C17,QC>/on/ 4, A (12 C 25. 26. 7 28. 29. 30. 1. 32. IOA I NI I N/ Y/Y CHP $66 (Rev. ?-67) OPI 042 u..pw......n.m m 4a 1 1. 2. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DRAFT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAY 5, 1992 CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M. Personnel - G.C. 54956.9 Litigation - G.C. 54956.9 Property Acquisition - 54956.8 No reportable action taken. CALL TO ORDER: M/Kim called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers, AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by M/Kim. ROLL CALL: Mayor Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Papen, Councilmen Forbing, Miller and Werner. Also present were Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager; Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager; Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney; James DeStefano, Director of Community Development and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Forbing thanked everyone for their participation during the City's 3rd Anniversary celebration. C/Miller announced that the City's contract with the County for weed abatement would be amended to provide for removal by private firms in an effort to improve services. MPT/Papen stated that she and the City Manager had been in Sacramento to support legislation on property tax and land for the high school. She indicated that both bills had passed through the Senate Appropriations Committee and would be going to the Senate floor in about 10 days. Following approval by the Senate, the bills would go to the House. M/Kim reported that during the rioting in Los Angeles and Pomona, no incidents were reported in the City. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Don Gravdahl, 23988 Minnequa, representing the Historical Society, thanked the Jaycees, the D.B. Improvement Assn. and other committee members for their assistance in putting together the City's 3rd Anniversary Celebration. Entertainment included bands from South Pointe and Lorbeer, the choir from Chaparral, the Sunshine Generation and D.B./Walnut Theatre Group. Donations were received from Lucky Is, Albertson's, Ralphs, Vons and Alpha Beta. He further expressed gratitude to Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Assistant, for her support and participation in coordinating the program. In regard to advertising events such as these, he suggested that banner poles be considered for installation on Diamond Bar Blvd. MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 2 In response to comments by William Gross, 21637 Highbluff Rd., M/Kim stated that the Council had not yet awarded a contract to any waste hauler and will not until negotiations are complete and the Council has approved a contract. Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Dr., requested that the Council again consider imposing term limitations on Council members. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., thanked the City and Caltrans for participating in the removal of graffiti on freeway signs and for the installation of wire to protect the signs. He reported that Code Enforcement activities do not appear to be taken seriously by the Code Enforcement Officer and suggested that this person be replaced by the City. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: MPT/Papen requested that the Warrant Register be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. C/Forbing moved, MPT/Papen seconded to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 5.3. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Werner, MPT/Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None 5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1.1 Fire Station No. 119 Open House - May 9, 1992 April - 10:00 to 5:00 p.m., 20480 Pathfinder Rd. 5.1.2 Planning Commission General Plan Public Hearing - May 11, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD 5.2.2 Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. of 5.1.3 Sheriff's Quarterly Breakfast - May 12, 1992 - 7:00 a.m., AQMD, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.1.4 City Council Meeting - May 19, 1992 - 6:00 5.4 PLANNING p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5.2.1 Regular Meeting of April 7, 1992 - Approved as submitted. 5.2.2 Regular Meeting of April 21, 1992 - Approved as submitted. 5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 5.4.1 Regular Meeting of March 23, 1992 - Received and filed. 5.4.2 Regular Meeting of April 13, 1992 - Received and filed. 5.5 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - 5.5.1 Regular Meeting of March 12, 1992 - Received and filed. 5.5.2 Regular Meeting of April 9, 1992 - Received and filed. MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 3 5.6 Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes - 5.6.1 Regular Meeting of March 12, 1992 - Received and filed. 5.6.2 Special Meeting of March 19, 1992 - Received and filed. 5.7 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Denied Claim for Damages filed by Sherry Ann Tyree April 4, 1992. 5.8 EXONERATED SURETY BOND POSTED FOR WATER SYSTEM - Located on Tract No. 42533, Montefino Condominiums, in the amount of $114,000. 5.9 EXONERATED SURETY BOND POSTED FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS - Located on Tract No. 42533, Montefino Condominiums, in the amount of $120,000. 5.10 REDUCED SURETY BOND POSTED FOR TRACT NO. 36741 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - Montefino Condominiums for drainage, sewer, road and water system improvements in the amount of $94,000. 5.11 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS INTO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX LANDS INTO SAID DISTRICT; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS THEREON. 5.12 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-18: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38; AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WITHIN SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS HEREON. 5.13 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-19: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39; AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WITHIN SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS THEREON. 5.14 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 4 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41; AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WITHIN SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS HEREON. 5.15 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR STREET TREE TRIMMING SERVICES - West Coast Arborists, the lowest bidder, in the amount of $36,590. 5.16 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-21: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING INSTALLATION OF NO PARKING SIGNS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD FROM COLIMA ROAD/GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE TO 310 FEET NORTH OF WESTBOUND ROUTE 60 OFF -RAMP. 5.17 APPROVED AGREEMENT REGARDING ACTING CITY MANAGER POSITION - Appointed Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager, to the position of Acting City Manager effective May 18, 1992 to September 8, 1992. 5.18 APPROVED MEMBERSHIP OF CHINO HILLS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY - Authorized Councilman Forbing to execute the consent form on behalf of the City as the City's delegate to the Authority. WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - C/Werner asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the request. CA/Arczynski stated that a memorandum had been submitted to the City Manager indicating that it was a valid payment for the Council to consider. C/Forbing moved, C/Miller seconded to approve Warrant Register dated May 5, 1992 in the amount of $182,283.40. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Forbing, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - MPT/Papen 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC. 6.1 CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION AND CITY TILES - Presented to Members of the General Plan Advisory Committee in Recognition of their services to the City in formulating the General Plan. 6.2 CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION - Presented to team members from New Liberal Arts Clinic of Claremont Colleges for their study of electro -optical applications in cooperation with GTE and AQMD. MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 5 New Liberal Arts Clinic team leader Stewart Winkler, members Zulema Cervantes, Joyce Chen, Andrew Altholtz, Ashish Patel, and Scott Palmer discussed their research and findings. 6.3 PROCLAMATIONS: 6.3.1 Proclaimed May 9, 1992 as "Fire Service Day." Asst. Fire Chief Bob Lee accepted the proclamation and announced that an Open House would be held at Station 119 on Saturday, May 9 and invited the City Council, staff and the public to drop in. 6.3.2 Proclaimed May, 1992 as "Goodwill Industries Month." 6.3.3 Proclaimed May 3-9, 1992 as "Victims of Pornography Week." 6.3.4 Proclaimed May 4-10, 1992 as "Public Service Recognition Week." 6.3.5 Proclaimed May 6-12, 1992 as "Hire -a -Veteran Week" - Presented to Mr. John Gili. 6.3.6 Proclaimed May 13, 1992 as "Teacher Appreciation Day" - Presented to Scott Tharp on behalf of Yvonne Sevilla, W.V.U.S.D. Teacher of the Year and Sue Williams, P.U.S.D. Teacher of the Year. 6.3.7 Proclaimed May 18-22, 1992 as "Classified Employee Week." Presented to Scott Tharp on behalf of Gail Fowler, W.V.U.S.D. Classified School Employee and Tom Hollister, P.U.S.D. Classified School Employee. 6.3.8 Proclaimed May 17-23, 1992 as "National Public Works Week." RECESS: M/Kim recessed the meeting at 7:10 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Kim reconvened the meeting at 7:23 p.m. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters can be heard. 7.1 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22986 (TPM) AND DENIAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (DR) 92-1 - CDD/DeStefano reported that this matter was an appeal of a Planning Commission recommendation to deny a tentative parcel map and development review for a 6,000 sq. ft. office building. He indicated that a number of letters had been received opposing the project due to inconsistency of land uses and/or concern over inadequacy of Sunset Crossing to handle parking or traffic demands. The applicant expressed a desire to have the project reconsidered with a new design eliminating some of the Sunset Crossing concerns but new drawings were not available for Commission review. He recommended that the Planning MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 6 Commission's denial of TPM 22986 and Development Review 92-2 be upheld. In response to C/Miller's questions, CDD/DeStefano stated that he believed the appeal was a means to continue public discussion of the merits of the project. C/Miller stated that he felt that the Council should deal with what was denied and not with new designs or stan- dards not reviewed by the Commission. MPT/Papen stated that Item F, Page 2 of Resolution No. 92-11 discusses findings that the small developable area would be out of character with commercially -developable properties in the area of the site. CDD/DeStefano stated that the concern is that the project is on a "remnant" lot and that there appears to be a desire to construct a commercial building facing Sunset Crossing. Sunset Crossing at Navajo Springs is resi- dential in character and it is felt that this type of commercial building would be inconsistent with the neighborhood. C/Werner stated that he had seen a map of the property with a slope overlay on that part of the property, a restriction or slope easement. CDD/DeStefano stated that he was not familiar with a slope overlay but was aware of a possible slope mainten- ance easement. Further, he was not aware of any building restriction or other types of restrictive easements for utilization of the property. In response to M/Kim's question regarding compatible development, CDD/DeStefano stated that the most com- patible would be residential such as a home designed to match the slopes versus the slopes designed to match the home. M/Kim opened the Public Hearing. David Hyala, 140 Olinda P1., Brea, stated that the Planning Commission had not reviewed the latest site plan design and felt that the project was unfairly denied based on parking problems in the area. He pointed out that they are proposing eight more spaces on the lower lot. CA/Arczynski stated that this was an appeal and review of a recommendation of denial of the subdivision for which a specific application was filed. Not before the Council is new parking arrangements, reduction in the scope of the building, etc. If the applicant wishes to take it back to the Planning Commission, he should withdraw the MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 7 application and submit a new application with the changes. Fred Janz, 2683 Shady Ridge, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission's concerns and stated that he had collected 114 signatures indicating support of the project, 25 of the which were residents of the apartments across the street. CA/Arczynski stated that if the applicant wishes to withdraw the application and the Council concedes, then the application would be withdrawn either with or without prejudice. If it is withdrawn without prejudice, the applicant could file a new application and start the process all over. C/Forbing asked if Mr. Janz would be willing to request a withdrawal without prejudice so that the matter could again be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Mr. Janz stated that he would. The following persons spoke in opposition to the project: William Stidston, 522 Navajo Spring Rd. Don Gravdahl, 23988 Minnequa C/Forbing, C/Miller and MPT/Papen concurred with M/Kim to suspend the public hearing temporarily. C/Forbing moved, C/Miller seconded to accept the applicant's request to withdraw the tentative map and appeal of denial of the development review without prejudice. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Forbing, Miller, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - MPT/Papen ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None Joe Becker, resident, spoke in opposition to the Council's decision. 7.2 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89551, LOCATED ON A 4.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 800 SOUTH GRAND AVE., DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - CDD/DeStefano reported that this request was for approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 51079 and amendment to CUP No. 89-551 to consider conversion of an existing (under construction) 54 -unit apartment complex located at 800 S. Grand Avenue, for the purpose of individual unit ownership. The Planning Commission recommended approval MAY 51 1992 PAGE 8 of both actions. One of the issues raised during Planning Commission review was whether or not garages should be provided for the development. After an analysis incorporating input from the Sheriff's Department, it was agreed that carports should be provided for half of the proposed parking spaces and that security gates should be provided at the entrance to the site. Through conditions of approval, the Planning Commission recommended that those measures be incorporated into the site design and development and that the City Council approve the amendment to the CUP and the Tentative Tract Map. C/Werner stated that he would like to see the median strip relandscaped and asked for staff input on this and the parking issue. In addition, because of the closeness of the patios to Grand Ave., he requested that there be regulations to prevent the storage of freezers, hanging of laundry, etc. and asked that the City Attorney supply the wording for it. He also suggested that the landscaping proposed for Grand Ave. be doubled. He further stated that he had a problem with the addition of security gates. CDD/DeStefano stated that a grouping of trees is proposed for the public right-of-way at the street, as well as trees to be placed at the main entrance and throughout the site. Slopes are to be replanted with a hydra -seed mix of a variety of things and a shrub plan is proposed incorporating a variety of plantings and ground covers throughout all the trees. C/Werner requested that trees be no smaller than 15 gallon and include 24" to 36" box specimen trees. MPT/Papen stated that the project was designed as apartments, without washer and dryer hookups, garages and storage facilities for any unit. Further, she has requested staff to set up criteria for condominiums to require garages with automatic openers. She also expressed concern that if a security gate is installed, cars could stack up into the street awaiting entrance. CDD/DeStefano stated that the Planning Commission was concerned that if two -car garages were required, open space on the site would disappear in addition to the financial feasibility of proceeding with the project. Following Commission discussion, it was agreed that a gate be required with the provision of visitor parking outside the gate. MPT/Papen stated that she was very concerned over the lack of storage areas and that if the City mandated installation of garage door openers, residents would be more likely to park their cars in the garages rather than MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 9 using them for storage. She further stated that according to the staff report, Grand Ave. will be striped 100 ft. for a deceleration lane into the project and if that is the case, the apron of the driveway would require widening to allow room for stacking on the property. In response to C/ForbingIs question, CDD/DeStefano stated that the gate was proposed to be located 80 to 90 ft. from the street, which would allow for approximately four cars for stacking. Ricky Chang, 24250 Barker Dr., stated that when he and his partners bought the land, they were unaware of the controversy surrounding construction of the apartments and after speaking with City staff, they felt that it would be better to convert the project to condominiums. He further stated that washer/dryer hookups for stacking units have already been installed and that they would be willing to provide more extensive landscaping. C/Miller stated that he felt Council would like to see documentation regarding the items proposed before making a decision and felt that the matter should be continued until then. Mr. Chang stated that during rush hour traffic, both in the morning and evening, the security gate would remain open to alleviate car stacking. C/Werner asked for a list of the applicant's other projects by the next meeting so that he could check them out. MFT/Papen asked if they would be willing to construct garages. Mr. Chang stated that they have looked into constructing garages but felt that it would look unattractive. The units range in size from 900 to 1115 sq. ft. and are proposed to sell for approximately $140,000 each. RECESS: M/Kim recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Kim reconvened the meeting at 9:44 p.m. and re -opened the Public Hearing. The following spoke in opposition to the project: Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Rd. Martha Bruske Bill Tinsman Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Dr. With no further testimony offered, M/Kim closed the Public Hearing. MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 10 C/Werner suggested that the matter be held over to allow staff to come back with an assessment on how the project fits in with the Housing Element so that if Council is inclined to approve the conversion, it can be done and serve to accomplish some of the Element's objectives. He further stated that he would like to see incorporated additional landscaping, minimum one -car garages with automatic openers and more amenities. C/Werner moved, MPT/Papen seconded to continue the matter to May 19, 1992. CA/Arczynski requested that the applicant indicate his concurrence with the request to continue the item. Mr. Chang indicated that he concurred with Council's request for a continuance. With the following Roll Call vote, motion was defeated: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, MPT/Papen NOES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, M/Kim ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None C/Miller moved, C/Forbing seconded to direct staff to prepare resolutions of approval with findings, conditions and mitigation measures to be brought back to Council at the next meeting with the applicant to supply the entry area designs showing stacking, storage areas, specifica- tions on the washer and dryer facilities, a focused design on the Grand Ave. landscaping and when it comes back, an indepth study on that so Council can guarantee screening and that the subdivision application be changed to read "Walnut School District." C/Werner asked for clarification as to storage areas. C/Miller stated that the applicant had stated that they were designing storage areas for each unit that would accommodate storage and that he would like to see a design as to how they are being provided. Further, that the condition restricting usage of patio walls for laundry, etc. be included. He reported that signaliz- ation had been agreed upon and that the entrance would be modified to provide safe ingress and egress. CA/Arczynski stated to the applicant that the motion on the floor was to approve the project and bring back the formal resolutions approving the project in two weeks. Included within that are additional requirements for additional landscaping, storage and other items that have been addressed and asked if it was acceptable. Mr. Chang stated that it was. MAY 5, 1992 PAGE 11 With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Forbing, MPT/Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None C/Werner asked that the record state that his "No" vote was not against condominiums but about converting an apartment project without adequate facilities from the developer. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Werner announced that a number of residents have been assisting riot victims in the South Central L.A. area and that help is needed in shuttling people to various places. Persons interested in helping should contact Mike Goldenberg. 9. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Kim adjourned the meeting at 10:25 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DRAFT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAY 19, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER: M/Kim called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. in the Council Chamber, AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by M/Kim. ROLL CALL: Mayor Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Papen, Councilmen Forbing, Miller and Werner. Also present were Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager; Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager; Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney; James DeStefano, Director of Community Development and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 2. COUNCIL COMMENTS: MPT/Papen announced that upon receiving word that several of her campaign signs had been placed in the wrong locations, they had been removed. She also announced that the Foothill Transit Zone will add a new commuter service bus line from Chino Hills to the Fullerton train station which is expected to start at the end of the year. The route would begin at Carbon Canyon and travel to Chino Hills Pkwy., down Grand Ave. to Diamond Bar Blvd. to Pathfinder, down Route 57 to Lambert to State College Blvd. to Chapman, Lemon to the train station. She stated that a system map provided by Foothill Transit was available. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: William Gross, 21637 Highbluff, spoke in regard to MPT/Papen's recent fundraiser and expressed his concern over what he considered a potential conflict of interest. Jim Paul, 1269 Ahtena, directed comments to MPT/Papen, M/Kim and C/Miller regarding his opposition to the decision made on the trash issue. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: M/Kim stated that he would abstain from voting on Item 4.12 due to a possible conflict of interest. C/Forbing moved, C/Miller seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Werner, MPT/Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None 4.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 2 4.1.1 Traffic & Transportation Commission - May 21, 1992 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.1.2 Memorial Day Holiday Observed - Monday, May 25, 1992 - City Offices closed. 4.1.3 Planning Commission - General Plan Hearing - May 26, 1992 - AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.1.4 Parks & Recreation Commission - May 28, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.1.5 Planning Commission Meeting - Tres Hermanos Conceptual Plan Presentation - June 8, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.1.6 City Council Draft General Plan Public Hearings - June 9, 16, 23, and 30, 1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.2 WARRANT REGISTER - Approved Warrant Register dated May 19, 1992 in the amount of $276,994.77. 4.3 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONCESSION STAND AT CARLTON J. PETERSON PARK - Creative Homes, Inc., the lowest responsive bidder, in the amount of $45,590.00. 4.4 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-22: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38, LOCATED ON TEMPLE AVENUE, BETWEEN GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 4.5 BOND EXONERATION - Accepted the grading work at 2810 Wagon Train and exonerated the cash deposit posted in the amount of $2,100. 4.6 REDUCED FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND - Construction of sewer, water and regional planning -required improvements at 1300-1360 Valley Vista Drive on Parcel 20358 in the amount of $292,000. 4.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-23: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS INTO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX SAID LANDS INTO SAID DISTRICT; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 92-17; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS HEREON - Public Hearing set for June 16, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 3 4.8 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-24: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38; AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WITHIN SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 92-18; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS HEREON - Public hearing set for June 16, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. 4.9 AWARDED CONTRACT FOR GOLDEN SPRINGS DR./SYLVAN GLEN ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEM - to Excel Paving Co. in the amount of $29,956.50 and authorized staff to execute change orders for unforeseen items not to exceed 10% of the contract amount. 4.10 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 51079 AND AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-551 - continued to June 2, 1992. 4.11 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPROVAL REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 91-2 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NO. 47851 AND 48487 - continued to June 2, 1992. 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC. 5.1 PRESENTATION OF CITY TILES - M/Kim presented City Tiles to Bob Zirbes, President, D.B. Improvement Association and to the D.B. Jaycees for their assistance in the City's 3rd Anniversary celebration. 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION - MPT/Papen presented a Certificate of Recognition to Michael J. Burns, Jr., an eighth grade student at Chaparral Middle School, in recognition of his selection from among more than 5,000 youth baseball players as an "East-West Ambassador." He will represent the United States in baseball games played in Japan and China. 5.3 CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION - C/Werner presented Certificates of Recognition to Eric Lane who placed first; Judy Ann Ramescal, placed second and Steven Reeves placed third in the annual Jr. Women's Club Spelling Bee. 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR IN SUPPORT OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COORDINATED PARATRANSIT PLAN - C/Werner moved, MPT/Papen seconded to adopt Resolution No. 92-25 supporting the Los Angeles County Coordinated Paratransit Plan. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 4 AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Werner, Forbing, MPT/ Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None 6.2 PRESENTATION OF DRAFT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 - CM/Van Nort reported that the draft budget presented to Council during the meeting represented a 2.1% reduction from the previous years' appropriations and a '4.8% reduction in operating expenses. C/Werner moved, C/Forbing seconded to set a Public Hearing for June 2, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. for consideration of the 1992-93 fiscal year budget and Capital Improvement Program. With the following vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Forbing, Miller, MPT/ Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None RECESS: M/Kim recessed the meeting at 6:30 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Kim reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS MATTERS CAN BE HEARD 7.1 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 - ACM/Belanger reported that landscaping improvements to be maintained through the assessment in District 39 would include medians, parkways, mini -parks, slopes and open space areas. Installation of a tot lot at the mini -park on Summitridge and Softwind and improvements to various landscaping irrigation systems has been proposed. A reduction in the assessment of 5% over the previous year's assessment of $77.00 per parcel was recommended in the Engineer's Report. M/Kim opened the Public Hearing. With no testimony offered, M/Kim closed the Public Hearing. In response to C/Werner Is request, ACM/Belanger affirmed that services would remain as previously provided with a slight increase in the capital improvement budget for the next fiscal year. MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 5 C/Werner moved, C/Miller seconded to adopt Resolution No. 92-26 levying an assessment on Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 for FY 92-93. With the Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN NOES: COUNCILMEN ABSENT: COUNCILMEN ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Papen, M/Kim - None - None None Werner, MPT/ 7.2 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-27: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 - ACM/Belanger reported that proposed improvements within District 41 include medians, parkways, mini- parks, slopes and open space areas. The Engineer's report indicates that the current assessment of $227.00 per parcel could be decreased to $220.50 for FY 1992-93 reflecting an approximate 4% reduction. M/Kim opened the Public Hearing. With no testimony offered, M/Kim closed the Public Hearing. C/Werner moved, C/Miller seconded to adopt Resolution No. 92-27 levying an assessment on Landscape Assessment District No. 41 for FY 1992-93. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Werner, Forbing, MPT/ Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None 7.3 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING A REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME ON TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31977, A SUBDIVISION TO CREATE 22 LOTS ON 16 ACRES LOCATED GENERALLY BETWEEN CROMARTY DRIVE, LEYLAND DRIVE AND GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - CDD/DeStefano explained that the applicant requested a two-year extension of time for Tract No. 31977, comprised of 22 lots on 16 acres generally located on Highcrest Dr., between Armitos P1. and Gold Rush. The proposed lots range in size from 16,000 to 158,000 sq. ft. and are zoned RPD 20,000. The project was approved by the City in February, 1990 and state law allows for extensions totaling 12 months; therefore, a two-year extension would not be permitted. He further stated that the map con- formed to City development standards when approved, but it does not currently conform to newly -created standards MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 6 such as land -form grading. In addition, the map proposes to utilize single access driveways for more than one lot, with some drives at 20% grade. No landscape or irriga- tion plans and no proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions were previously approved. Concrete terrace drains currently exist as well as visible 2-1 slopes which, based upon current development practices, should be redesigned in a more integrated fashion with existing developments and reflect more of the natural topography of the area. When reviewed by the Planning Commission, the applicant agreed to provide staff with an alternative preliminary grading plan to incorporate land -form grading techniques. The applicant submitted revised drawings which were not reviewed by the Planning Commission. Based upon the applicant's willingness to incorporate alterations into the map to meet current standards, the Commission recommended approval of a one-year extension of time conditioned upon meeting current hillside stan- dards. CDD/DeStefano then recommended denial of the extension requested as the map does not meet current development standards. He announced that a letter was received from Mr. & Mrs. E.F. McDowell expressing concern regarding the present appearance of the property and requesting clean up or development to eliminate illegal dumping, etc. CA/Arczynski indicated that the safest decision for the Council to make would be to deny the request and allow the applicant to process a new application. Following discussion, M/Kim opened the Public Hearing. Martha Bruske, 600 S. Great Bend, asked when consider- ation would be given to installation of a traffic signal on Gold Rush at Diamond Bar Blvd. C/Miller stated that the matter of a signal at Gold Rush and Diamond Bar Blvd. had been considered by the Traffic & Transportation Commission who approved adding the signal to the City's capital improvement system. Michael Goldenberg, 1859 Morning Canyon, expressed concern over liability and possible litigation at some future date if an extension is not granted for this project. With no further testimony offered, M/Kim closed the Public Hearing. C/Werner moved, M/Kim seconded to extend the map as recommended by the Planning Commission. C/Miller stated that he did not feel that the conditions were restrictive enough and that the Council needs to require implementation of single drives, landscaping and MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 7 irrigation plans to be provided expeditiously and that CC&R's be developed. He felt that a year is too long but indicated that he would support a six month extension. Mr. Lind indicated that he felt that the applicant would be able to complete landscape plans and CC&R's and process the project within six months. C/Werner amended his motion to reduce the time extension to six months. M/Kim withdrew his second and C/Miller seconded the motion and pointed out that the approval included conditions previously stated and required the applicant to keep the land cleared. It was agreed that the deadline for the extension would be November 18, 1992. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Forbing, Miller, MPT/ Papen, M/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - None CA/Arcyznski stated that staff would bring back the appropriate resolutions reflecting the Council's statements. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS: MPT/Papen announced that the State Senate had approved legislation supporting the acquisition of land for a high school and that the matter is now being considered by the Assembly. C/Werner stated that he had received a letter from D.B. Honda regarding modification of the sign ordinance and requested that the matter be scheduled for Council consideration on June 2, 1992. ACM/Belanger announced that a transit survey had been delivered to residents with The Windmill and requested that they be completed and returned. 9. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Kim adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Pro Tem Papen�nd Councilmember Forbing FROM: Linda Q. Magnuson(�Senior Accountant SUBJECT: Voucher Register, June 2, 1992 DATE: May 28, 1992 Attached is the Voucher Register dated June 2, 1992. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to it's entry on the Consent Calender. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated June 2, 1992 have been audited approved and recommended for payment. Pa allowed from the following funds in these amounts Payments are hereby FUND _N_O. FUND DESCRIPT__IO_N AMOUNT 001 General Fund 112 Prop A Fund $466,022.28 115 Int. Waste Mgt. Fund 10,373.25 138 LLAD #38 Fund 16.00 139 LLAD #39 Fund 8,491.67 141 LLAD #41 Fund 7,360.40 227 Traffic Mit. Fee Fund 3,386.58 250 CIP Fund 2,925.00 —1.718 50 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $500,293.68 APPROVED BY: Linda G. Ma n son Senior Accountant �B Terrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager Phy1 is E. Paper Mayor Pro Tem John A. Forbing Councilmember *** City of D i a a o n d Bar +** RUN TIME: 15:3905128/92 VOUCHER RE6ISTER DUE THRU.............06162/92 . VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PRDJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARA Services ARAService }061-4010-2325 2 20602D *001-4090-2399 1 20602D ARA/Cory Refreshment Svcs ARA *661-4698-2325 1 26662A ASL Consultants ASL *138-4538-4806 1 20602A *136-4538-4000 2 206024 *139-4539-4600 1 28692A *141-4541-4806 1 26602A Accurate Landscape Accurate *061-4331-2216 1 21602A *136-4536-5519 1 24662A *138-4538-5519 2 24602A Accurate Landscape Accurate *138-4536-2210 1 20602A *139-4539-2218 1 206O2A *1384538-5560 1 20602A *139-4539-5588 1 20662A Advance Data Systems AdvDataSys *661-4090-2200 1 26662A Alfred Sobar Associates A16obar *601-2300-1016 2 20602A Alvarez, April AlvarezA feel -4356-5366 3 20602C PASE 1 * * PREPAID * + AMOUNT DATE CHECK -------------------------- 05/21 66/62 Reiab for CCCA Mtg 3/18 688.29 05121 06/02 1567077335 Reiab for CCCA Mtg 3/18 75.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 755.29 65/27 06/02 264674 Meeting Supplies 34.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 34.66 05121 66/62 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 38 1,380.66 05/27 66/02 13166 Engr Svc -Annex -Dist 236 1,664.50 05/27 66/62 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 39 637.60 05127 66162 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 41 241.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 3,923.66 05/27 66/62 24722 Drain Cleaning -Sycamore 1,661.6/ 85/27 16/62 24722 Yeed Abatement:Sunst Crss 166." 15/21 06/62 24722 Weed Abatement:Teaple 3"." TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 1,406." 65/27 06/42 24640 Supplies Dist 238 46.61 05/27 66/02 24666 Supplies -District 39 98.16 05/27 06/12 24828 May Maint Dist 238 3,166.61 85/27 66162 24829 May Maint Dist 239 5,586.60 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 8,738.67 05/27 66112 Computer Network Maint. 168.75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 168.75 05127 66/02 0366 Prof Svcs for TTSOS19 7,50." TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 7,501." 05/27 66112 Contract Class Instructor 285.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 285.80 RUN TIME: 15:39 *** 15/26192 ar *** City V D UCof Diamond BH E R R E 6 I S T E A DUE THRU.............16/92/92 PAGE 2 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PRDJ.TI-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRYIDUE INVOICE ------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION* * PREPAID t AMOUNT DATE CHECK --------------------- American Red Cross AserRedCrs *181-4111-2325 1 20682C 15/27 16/12 June 17 Mtg-Werner 21.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 28.10 American Society *881-4511-2321 of Civil AserCivil 2 20602A 11/1323 85/27 86182 1156656 Engr. Publications 18.51 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------; 1831 American Storage *181-4191-2141 LTD AserStorag 1 20662A 85/27 16/12 June Rent for 2 Units 153.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 153.0 Arsentrout, Phil *111-4441-4841 Areentrout 1 20612F 65127 16112 6151 Eser Coord Svcs -5/11-5/22 1,151.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR--------� 1 151.10 Bauer, Bob BauerB *181-4351-5388 4 26602C 85/27 06/12 Contract Class Instructor 141.45 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 148.45 Beke, John C. BOW *081-4553-4180 2 28682E 85127 16/12 5121 Cams Mtg 48.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y 48.80 Belanger, Terrence *081-4030-2331 L. BelangerT 1 28602A 05/27 86182 CCCA Expenses 5/14-5/11 143.74 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 143.74 Brea, City of *101-4358-5388 Breacity 2 20662A 81/1336 05127 16/02 Recr Svcs -May 42 26 339.38 TDTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 26,339.38 Brarn, Laurie BrovnL *181-4351-5380 5 20602C 65/27 16102 Contract Class Instructor 162.48 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y 162.40 C.L. McMillan *801-2300-1010 CLMcMillan 1 20602A 85127 86/82 Refund of Ping Deposit 131.25 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 131.25 *** Ci *+ RUN TIME: 15:39 05/26/92 ity V O UCof Damond HH E R R E 6 I 5 T E R ar + PAGE 1 DUE THRU.............06162/92 . VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK, + +PREPAID + + ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ARA Services ARAService *001-4010-2325 *001-4090-2399 2 20602D 1 20602D 05/27 06/62 Reimb for CCCA Mtq 3/18 660.29 05/21 06/02 1567077335 Reimb for CCCA Mtg 3/18 75.04 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 755.29 ARA/Cory Refreshment Svcs ARA +001-4096-2325 1 20662A 05/27 06/02 264674 Meeting Supplies 34,00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 34.01 ASL Consultants ASL *136-4538-4000 *138-4538-4000 1 20602A 2 206024 05/27 06/02 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 38 1,380.00 +139-4539-4000 1 20602A 05/27 06/02 13166 Engr Svc -Annex -Dist 138 1,664.51 *141-4541-4000 1 26602A 05/27 06/02 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 39 637.00 05127 16/02 13166 April Engr Svcs -Dist 41 241.51 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 3,923.00 Accurate Landscape Accurate *001-4331-2211 *138-4538-5519 1 20602A 1 20662A 05/27 16/02 24722 Drain Cleaning -Sycamore 1,100.0 *136-4536-5519 2 21602A 05/27 06/02 24722 Weed Abatement:Sunst Crss 101.0 05127 66/42 24722 Weed Abatement:Temple 3N. N TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1,401.0 Accurate Landscape Accurate *138-4538-2211 *139-4539-2210 1 20602A 05/27 16/02 24640 Supplies Dist t38 40.01 +138-4538-5501 1 20602A 1 21602A 15/27 66/02 24666 Supplies -District 39 96.06 1139-4539-5501 1 29602A 05/27 06/02 24628 May Maint Dist 138 3,100.00 05/27 06/02 24629 May Maint Dist t39 5,500.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 8,736.07 Advance Data Systems AdvData5ys *001-4090-2201 1 20662A 05/27 66/02 Computer Network Maint. 168.75 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 168.75 Alfred 6obar Associates A16obar +001-2301-1010 2 206024 05/27 06/12 0306 Prof Svcs for TTSO519 7,500.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 7,500." Alvarez, April AlvarezA +401-4350-5306 3 28602C 05/27 66/02 Contract Class Instructor 265.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 265.60 Cannon's Cannons *811-4038-2325 2 20602E Carol's Temporaries CarolTemp *081-4698-4008 1 26682A Chavers, J. Todd ChaversJT 1001-4553-4100 1 20682E Cheng, Diana ChengD *081-4553-4108 3 20682E Community Develpment CommDevlp *081-4218-2325 1 20602A Computer Applied Systems CAS *081-4050-4830 1 26602A D. B. Improvement Assoc. DBIA *881-4218-4228 1 28682A ttt City of Diamond Bar t*t 85/27 RUN TIME: 15:39 85/26/92 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 66.88 DUE THRU.............06102/92 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. 86/02 Temporary Svcs -5/15/92 * } PREPAID t ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROJ.TX-N0 BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK CALED CALED 40.0 *001-4218-2315 1 20602A 05/27 66/02 Annual Membership Fees 250.00 40.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 250.80 Cambo's Welding CanbosWeld NCDA Lunch-DeStefano 25.88 +601-4311-2210 2 2002A 01/1350 05/27 66/62 Equip Maint-Grow Prk 40.00 Cannon's Cannons *811-4038-2325 2 20602E Carol's Temporaries CarolTemp *081-4698-4008 1 26682A Chavers, J. Todd ChaversJT 1001-4553-4100 1 20682E Cheng, Diana ChengD *081-4553-4108 3 20682E Community Develpment CommDevlp *081-4218-2325 1 20602A Computer Applied Systems CAS *081-4050-4830 1 26602A D. B. Improvement Assoc. DBIA *881-4218-4228 1 28682A TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 40.00 85/27 86/82 Install Dinner-CMgr 60.0 86/02/92 0008813297 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 66.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 6.08 05/27 86/02 Temporary Svcs -5/15/92 57.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------> 57.N 85/27 06/02 5/21 Coma Mtg 40.0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 48.80 05127 86/02 5/21 Coma Mtg 40.80 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 40.00 85127 06/82 NCDA Lunch-DeStefano 25.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 25.00 85127 86102 920185 June Computer Maint 145.08 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------) 745.60 05/27 06/62 Gen Plan_Ad-Windmill 308.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 388.00 RUM TIME: 15:39 15/28/92 Ct of Dia aond B V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R DUE THRU.............06/12/92 PAGE 4 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION} * PREPAID + + --------------------------- AMOUNT DATE CHECK -------------------------------------------•------ DGA Consultants Inc. D6AConsult +258-4510-6411 41492 4 20602A 81/1327 05/27 86/02 21988 -IN Prof Svc -Slurry Seal 1,016.50 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 1,018.54 Diamond Bar Business Asoc DBBusAssoc Diamond Bar Jaycees DBJaycees *101-4195-2353 1 286#2C Dwight French 6 Assoc. DwightFren +250-4511-6411 05992 2 2/02A 11/1290 Eastman Inc. Eastman "01-4511-1100 1 216828 *081-4090-1100 1 206828 Envicam Corporation Envicom +441-2318-1111 3 216028 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 041 05/27 06/02 Supplies for Anniv Party 25.81 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} P5_0 85/27 46/12 12738 Desdinsp-subdrainsai 701.0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 708.84 15/27 16/12 /881526/ Supplies -Pub Vks/Engr 26.52 05/21 16/02 8889/615 Supplies -Gen Govt 19.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 45.63 05/27 06/12 4807 Prof Svcs-EIR 91-03 8,867,25 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 6,867.2S Exxon ExxonS +001-4310-2311 +001-4190-2311 3 286028 1 05/27 16/02 1416226 Fuel-Prk I Maint 31.51 *081-4091-2311 216128 2 206128 15/21 16/12 1406764 Fuel -Sen Govt 11.60 *001-4310-2310 1 206128 05127 16/12 1417001 Fuel -Gen Govt 12.10 +001-4310-2310 S 216129 15/27 06/02 1407276 Fuel-Prk 3 Maint 31.62 +041-4218-2310 2 206128 05/27 06/12 2607501 Fuel-Prk 6 Maint 33.72 *001-4030-2310 3 216128 05127 16/02 2407921 Fuel-Plng 21.10 *011-4310-2311 2 21612865/27 05/27 06102 2618261 Fuel-Cmgr 19.46 *101-4216-2310 1 2/6128 86112 4205390 fuel-Prk 8 Maint 33.11 *801-4130-2318 2 206022 IS/27 16/12 4216156 Fuel-Pln 21.81 *001-4311-2310 4 20602E 15/27 06/#2 4206601 Fuel-Cogr 16.0 *811-4130-2311 1 21642B32.93 #5/27 06/42 4206661 Fuel-Prk d Maint 05/27 06/42 4207265 Fuel-CMgr 21.12 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 283.85 +++ City of Diamond Bar +++ RUN TIME: 15:39 85/28/92 V 0 U C H E R R E G I S T E R P46E 5 DUE THRU.............66/82/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR I0. + PREPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK Federal Express Corp. FedExpress +115-4515-2128 1 286828 65/27 86/82 Express Mail -Solid Vaste 16.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 16.88 Firestone Stores Firestone +881-4318-2288 2 266622 81/1355 85/27 66182 7168825984 Tires for Prks Truck 145.73 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 145.73 Flamenbaum, Bruce Flamenbaum +881-4218-4188 7 20602C 65/27 86/82 May Comm Mt9s13) 188.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 188.88 Freeman, Jude Freeman] +881-4358-5388 6 20602C 85/27 86182 Contract Class Instructor 72.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------) 72.0 GTE California GTE +881-4313-2125 1 286828 85/27 66182 May Phone Svcs -Heritage 58.56 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---_----> 58.56 GTE California GTE +881-4313-2125 2 20662D 85/27 66/82 Phone Svc -Heritage 179.38 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 179.36 GTEL 6TEL +881-4898-2138 1 286820 85/27 66/82 June Equip Rental 886.63 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 886.63 Gardner Communications GardnerCom +881-4218-2118 1 286828 85127 86182 987 Gen Plan Posters 925.69 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 925.64 Gonsalves 3 Son, Joe A. Gonsalves +881-4898-4888 2 286828 85/27 86/82 June Prof Svcs 21188.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 2,188.88 6rothe, Jack GrotheJ +881-4218-4188 1 286828 85/27 86/82 Reimb Travel Exp -Seminar 36.44 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 36.48 ttt of Diamond Bar ++� RUN TIME: 15:39 05/26/92 City V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R PAGE 6 DUE THRU.............06/62/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + PREPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE -CHECK ---- 6rothe, Jack +001-4210-4100 6rotheJ 10 20602C 05121 06102 May Comm Mtgs(3) 180.0! TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 188.00 Heller 5 Associates +001-2110-1004 Heller 1 26602D @5127 06/02 June Dental Press 139.44 +001-2110-1004 2 21662D 05/27 06/02 Dental Credit 53.74- +001-2110-1006 1 20602D 05/27 06/02 June Vision Press 313.81 3 +001-2116-1006 2 20602D 05/27 06/02 Vision Credit 60.20 - TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 839.35 Hendricks, Kathe +001-4350-5300 HendricksK 7 20662C 05121 06102 Contract Claes Instructor 35.40 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 35.44 Highlander Publications Highlander 29.64 +001-2346-1010 4 20642B 05/27 66102 6315 Pub Hrg-ADR 92-45 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 29.64 Hoffman Technologies HoffTech 101.11 1001-4090-6230 1 20662B 45127 06/42 019274 Computer Svcs TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 107.17 I.E.S. +001-4210-2330 IE5 1 20602B 05127 06/02 Ping Seminar 7/1-Lungu 115.04 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 115.44 ICMA Retirement Trust t001-2110-1007 -457 ICMA 1 246428 05/27 06102 PP10711 Def Coop Deductns 380.00 +001-4630-0090 1 206428 05127 66/62 June Cale Conti-Cogr 804.16 +001-4040-4090 1 246628 05127 06102 June Cafe Contrib-CClk 543.44 +001-4050-0890 1 24602E 05127 06/02 June Cafe Contrib-Finance 179.61 +001-4210-0090 1 20602E 05/27 06/02 June Cafe Contrib-Ping 517.24 +001-4310-0090 1 266028 05/27 66/02 June Cafe Contrib-Prks 265.54 +601-4516-0090 1 206028 05/27 06102 June Cafe Contrib-Engr 827.48 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 3,497.47 Impressive Screenworks Impressive 480.02 +001-4350-1260 2 206628 01/1361 65/27 06162 6236 Recreation Supplies TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 484.02 ++* City of Diamond Bar +++ RUN TINE: 15:39 15/28/92 V 0 U C H E R R E B I S T E R DUE THRU.............16/12/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION Inland Valley Dly Bulletn IVDB *001-4510-2115 1 206028 +141-4040-2115 3 24642B *001-4040-2115 1 266029 *011-4041-2115 2 20602B +101-2311-1111 1 266428 Jennings Engstrand JenningsEn +101-4121-4121 1 20612E 05127 06/12 dc10608 Joint Study Session 05/27 06!02 dc11949 Pub Hrg-Dist 41 65127 06/12 dc11499 Pub Hrg-TTM 31971 15/21 06/12 dc11126 Pub Hrg-Dist 39 05/27 46/62 dcii991 Pub Hrg-EIR 91-4 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> PAGE 7 * * PREPAID + * AMOUNT DATE CHECK ----------------------- 99.11 191.25 63.11 193.54 63.00 619.75 05/28 06/02 129861 April Prof Svcs 1,415.41 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 1,475.44 K I V Blueprint Service KIVB1uePrt +101-4511-2211 2 28602B 01/1328 05/27 06112 52218 Xerox 2511 Maint 215.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 275.0 Kens Hardvare 'Kens +111-4311-1210 2 206428 34/1211 05/27 06/12 55618 Operating Supplies 11.64 *111-4310-1211 1 20612B 33/1277 15/27 16/12 55823 Operating Supplies 1.13 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 12.11 Kleinfelder Kleinfeldr 1101-4551-5224 05892 2 206028 01/1219A 05127 06/62 582265 GeoTech-Prof. Svcs 2,117.67 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 2,117.67 Kotin Regan a Mouchly In. Kotin *001-1210 1 216028 05/27 66102 dial/3-4 TresHero-City Share 5,626.00 +001-4210-4240 2 206028 0111293A 15/27 /6//2 dia1/3-4 CtyIndstry-TresHer■ 5,826.00 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 11,652.01 L.A. County -Sheriff's Dep LACSheriff *001-4411-5401 1 20602C 05127 06102 92436 April Contract Svcs 299,148.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 299,148.14 LA County Agriculture Coe LACAgric *139-4539-5519 1 20662C 05127 06102 1668H March Pest Control-Dis 39 818.66 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 606.66 #*# City of Diamond Bar *## RUN TIME: 15:39 05/28/92 V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R DUE THRU.............06/02192 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.Ti-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION O.E.I Business Forms OEIBusines 1001-4040-1100 3 20602C 01/1357 PERS Health Benefits PERSHealth 1001-2110-1113 1 26642D #011-4090-1080 1 20602D Payroll Transfer PayrollTr #001-1126 1 21602F Pedrini, Barbara PedriniB *001-4350-5301 8 26602C Pete Volbeda L Associates VolbedaAsc *001-3430 11 21682C Pitney Bores PitneyBove *001-4090-2310 3 20682C Pomona Vly Transportation PomonaVly *112-4360-5310 1 20602C Postage By Phone PostByPhon *001-4090-2126 1 29602C Public Empl Retirement PERS *001-2110-1008 1 20602C *001-2110-1006 2 20602C PAGE 9 # PREPAID AMOUNT DATE CHECK 05/27 06/12 12034313 Copy Paper 584.55 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 564.55 15/27 06/12 Med Ins Press -June 6,165.94 05/27 16112 Admin Fees 33.84 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 6,799.78 05127 06/12 Payroll 11 Transfer 38,506.11 06/12/92 0000040011 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 38,510.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 1.01 15/27 16/12 Contract Class Instructor 157:10 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 157.10 ay 05/27 06/12 Plan Check Refund 119.29 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 119.29 05/27 06/12 July -Sept Post Scale Rent 216.23 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 206.23 05/26 06/42 Bus Svc -3rd Anniv Party 287.5/ TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 267.50 15/27 06/02 Postage Replenishment 1,000.11 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 1,000.00 05/27 06/02 PP11 Emplyr Retire Cantrb 2,928.30 05127 06/12 PP11 Emplye Retire Contrb 2,572.64 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 5,510.94 +++ City o4 D i a a o n d Bar +++ RUN TINE: 15:39 85126/92 V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R PAGE 18 DUE THRU.............06/82/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. PREPAID + + ACCOUNT PROJ.TK-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK R I D Blueprint RIDBlue +801-4553-2118 1 20682C 85/27 16/12 46211 Aerial Copy 21.26 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 21.26 Radio Dispatch Corp. RadioDispa +811-4831-2138 1 20612C 15/27 16/12 Nay Beeper Rent-CMgr 18.75 +811-4318-2131 1 20602C 85/27 86/82 May Beeper Rent-Prks 56.25 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 75.11 Repro Graphics , ReproGraph +881-4191-2118 1 20602C 15/27 16182 5483 Stationary Supplies 111.56 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------) 111.56 Robert Driver Ins Co. RobDrive +881-2311-1184 1 20682A 85/27 86/12 Spec Event Insurnce-4/92 95.42 +111-2311-1814 2 21682E 85/28 86/12 Spec Event Insurance 89.0 TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------> 175.42 RonKranzeraAssoc C.E. Inc RKA +111-4553-5222 1 21602C 85/27 16/82 92-6617 Engr Inspections 5,641.72 +881-4551-5223 1 20602C 85/27 06/82 92-6818 Plan Check Fees 1,746.34 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 7,391.16 San Gabriel Valley City S6VCMA +081-4830-2325 1 20602F 05/27 86/12 1992 Wrkshop-Belanger 51.81 66/62/92 8000812966 TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----) 51.88 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 1.11 San Gabriel Vly Tribune SGVTribune +001-4040-2115 6 2$612D 05/27 86/02 sgvt5977 Pub Hrg-Household Waste 183.24 +801-4518-2115 2 26612D 85/28 86102 sgvt6/18 TT/Ping Circulation Elea 99.33 +001-2308-1818 5 21642D 05/27 06/62 sgvt6842 Pub Hrg-TTM 31977 61.31 +001-4840-2115 4 206/2D 05/27 86182 sgvt6643 Pub Hrg-LAD 139 245.55 +081-4040-21N5 5 20602D 85/27 86/82 sgvt6/44 Pub Hrg-LAD 141 282.11 +001-2388-1818 6 20602D 85121 16/82 sgvt6167 Pub Hrg-ADR 92-85 48.56 +811-2308-1811 2 20682D 05127 16/62 sgvt6123 Pub Hrg-EIR 91-4 64,77 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------) 1,035.47 Sears Roebuck and Co. Sears +881-4318-1301 2 20602D 81/1304 05127 06/12 016382897377 Seall Tools I Equip 424.96 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 424.91 {** ar *** RUN TIME: 15:39 85/26/92 City V 0 UCof Dia■and BH E A R E 6 I 5 T E A DUE THRU.............06/82/92 PAGE 11 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION * * PREPAID * * - -------------------------------------- ----------------------- -------- AMOUNT DATE CHECK Securicorp Int'l Inc. Securicorp *881-4553-5531 1 20602D 85127 86182 12765 April Grassing Guard Svcs 5,225.85 Short, Jerry *881-4358-5388 Short) 9 20642C 85127 86/82 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y Contract Class Instructor 5, 225.85 382.48 Siecke, Warren C. SieckeW *881-4553-5222 2 28682D *227-4514-6412 82292 1 286820 *881-4553-5222 3 29662D 65/27 86/82 85/27 86/82 85/27 86/82 2766-9 2767-9 2766-9 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} April Engr Design Svcs April Engr Design Svcs April Engr Design Svcs 362.44 1,125.00 2925.88 2,925.88 Sir Speedy *881-4218-2188 *112-4553-5526 *881-4-4228 *881-4809896 -2118 5irSpeedy 3 28682D 1 28682D 2 2066/82 2 286802D 2D 85126 86/82 85/27 86!82 85/21 885!27 86/82 9848 9859 9896 9899 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> Stationary Supplies Printing of PW Survey Printing Svcs -ben Plan Stationary Supplies 6,975.88 64.64 6,396.7S 49,24 So. Ca. Joint Powers Ins. SCJPIA TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 6,618.95 Southern CA. Edison *141-4541-2126 SoCaEdi5on 1 28642E 45/27 86/82 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> April Elect Svcs -Dist t41 8.88 45.49 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------} 45.46 Southern Ca. Edison *139-4539-2126 SoCaEdison 1 28662E. 85/21 86/42 April Elect Svcs -Dist t34 169.68 Southern Ca. Edison *481-4555-2126 SoCaEdison 1 28682E 85/27 86/82 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------? April Trfc Control Svcs 169.66 3,521.63 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 3f 521.63 Southern Ca. Edison *881-4316-2126 *841-4331-2126 SoCafdison 124682E 1 28682E 45/21 46/82 85127 46/82 Elect -Maple Hill Prk Elect -Sycamore Cyn Prk 266.18 235.76 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------3 521.66 RUN TIME: 15:39 85/26/92 +++ Cit V D y UCof DiH m and Ba +�+ E R R E 6 I 5 T E R PAGE 13 DUE THRU.............06/82/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION+ + PREPAID + + AMOUNT DATE CHECK U5 Sprint USSprint +881-4518-2125 1 28682E 85/27 86/82 Engr Long Dist Phne Svc 9.72 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 9.72 United Reprographics, Inc UnitedRepr +®81-4518-1288 1 28682E 85/27 86/82 891858 Drafting Supplies 53.84 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 53.84 United Way UnitedWay +881-2118-1889 1 286820 85/27 86/82 United Way Contr-PP8,9 67.81 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 61.84 University Extension UnivExt +881-4448-2348 2 28682E 81/1334 45127 86/82 722661 Emer Prep Train-Butzlaff 125.48 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 125.44 Ury, Donald UryD +441-4553-4111 4 24682E 45/21 86/82 5/21 Coss Mtg 44.01 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------> 46.0 Walnut Vly Water Dist YVWaterDis +138-4536-2126 2 24642E 85/27 86/42 March -April Water -Dist 36 1,154.95 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 11154.95 Walnut Vlv Water Dist WVWaterDis +139-4539-2126 2 28642E 45/27 86/82 March -April Water -Dist 39 146.64 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------y 146.64 Walnut Vly Water Dist WVWaterDis *8814311-2126 1 21612E 85/27 46/42 Water -Paul Grow Prk 554.15 +841-4316-2126 2 24642E 85/27 46/82 Water -Maple Hill Prk 673.55 TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------; 1,227.78 Western City Magazine WesternCit +881-4898-2115 1 24682E 45/28 66/82 Ad -Trans Planner 618.44 +481-4898-2115 2 24642E 65/28 06/42 21928 Ad-PW/Eng Director 772.61 TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 1,394.48 ttt City of Diamond Bar ttt RUN TIME; 15:39 95/28/92 V 0 U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R DUE THRU.............06/92/92 VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. ACCOUNT PRDJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINEJNO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION PAGE 14 t t PREPAID t t AMOUNT DATE CHECK TOTAL PREPAID -----------) 39,311.84 TOTAL DUE ---------------) 469,915.84 TOTAL REPORT ------------) 599,293.66 +++ City of Dia•ond Bar +++ RUN TIME: 15:3985128192 VOUCHER REGISTER FUND SUMMARY REPORT DUE THRU.............06/62/92 FUND 0816eneral Fund 136LLAD 08 Fund 139LLAD t39 Fund 141LLAD t41 Fund 258C.I.P. Fund 115Int Waste Mgat Fu 112Prop A -Transit Fu 227Traffic Mit Fee F TOTAL ALL FUNDS IISBURSE GIL HE WILL POST BSE HAS POSTED TOTAL DIRECT PAY REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE PAGE 1 FUTURE TRANSACTIONS REVENUE EXPENSE 466,022.26 77,349.94 192.29 386,488.65 ,491.67 8 8,441.67 7,3b0.40 7,360.40 3,386.58 3,386.58 1,718.50 1,118.50 16.00 16.08 10,313.25 10,313.25 2,425.08 2,925.00 ------------------------------------------------ 588,293.68 77,344.94 ----------- ------- 192.29 422,151.45 I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. J.t TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 /qy REPORT DATE: May 26, 1992 FROM: Linda G. Magnuso , Senior Accountant TITLE: Treasurer's Report - April 30, 1992 SUMMARY: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of April 1992. RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office) Other 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes_ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: / —1 --- I Terrence L. Belang Acting City Manage Linda G. Mag uson Senior Accountant CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - April 30, 1992 ISSUE STATEMENT: Per City policy, the Finance department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the April, 1992 Treasurer's Statement. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of April 1992. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances and investment account balances. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT April 30, 1992 UtNtHAL tUNIJ $5,626,131.75 $1,480,103.21 $1,060,366.23 $6,045,868.73 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 48,481.37 4,351.22 52,832.59 GAS TAX FUND 2,266,294.33 165,934.62 690.36 2,431,538.59 TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD 366,310.88 52,085.17 4,873.27 413,522.78 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FD 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND 0.00 0.00 INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD 14,219.02 6,327.24 4,551.46 15,994.80 OTS FUND (57,584.34) 19,084.46 (76,668.80) AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD 10,752.99 118.67 10,871.66 STATE PARK GRANT FUND 0.00 0.00 PARK FEES FUND 15,346.00 183.31 15,529.31 LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD 50,027.68 83,728.75 10,623.95 123,132.48 LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD 172,909.13 39,189.26 9,557.46 202,540.93 LANDSCAPE DIST#41 FD 81,987.79 43,267.28 16,049.91 109,205.16 GRAND AV CONST FUND 503,420.87 5,232.88 498,187.99 TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE FD 342,407.37 342,407.37 CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD 49,645.80 730.77 16,490.60 33,885.97 SB 821 FUND 19,759.85 282.49 20,042.34 SELF INSURANCE FUND 247,898.70 3,543.97 251,442,67 TOTALS $9,758,009.19 $1,879,845.96 $1,147,520.58 $0.00 $10,490,334.57 SUMMARY OF CASH: DEMAND DEPOSITS: INVESTMENTS: GENERAL ACCOUNT $7,073.59 PAYROLL ACCOUNT 1,355.95 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00 TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS TIME CERTIFICATES COMMERCIAL PAPER L.A.I.F. TOTAL INVESTMENTS $0.00 0.00 10,481,405.23 $8,929.54 10,481,405.23 TOTAL CASH $10,490,334.77 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APRIL 23, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Chavers called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. at the Diamond Bar Library, 1061 South Grand Ave., Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by ALLEGIANCE: VC/Gravdahl. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Beke, Vice Chairman Gravdahl, and Chairman Chavers. Commissioner Cheng arrived at 6:45 p.m. Commissioner Ury was absent (excused). Also present were Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra, Associate Engineer David Liu, and Sgt. Rawlings. MINUTES: C/Beke requested the Minutes of April 9, 1992 be amended on page 2, fifth line, to read "appear"; Apr. 9, 1992 page 3, fifth paragraph, to read "...objecting to... 11; page 5, second paragraph, to replace "with" with "giving"; to properly spell the name Ed Rugel; page 8, third bullet, to properly spell "borne"; page 8, second paragraph, to properly spell "past"; and page 9, second paragraph, to change "signal" to "signs". Chair/Chavers requested the minutes to be amended on page 1, to properly spell the name Rhonda Aihara, and Chinook; page 1, last paragraph, to indicate 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., and to properly spell "rumble" strip; and page three, to properly spell Carlos Kilburg and to indicate that he is head of the crossing guard service for Diamond Bar. Chair/Chavers questioned the accuracy of the motions, as reflected on page 4 and page 5. He stated that he will accept the motions as is but requested staff to be more cautious and accurate in the future. Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept the Minutes of April 9, 1992, as amended. COMMISSION C/Beke informed the Commission that he will be COMMENTS: unable to attend the Planning Commission public hearing meeting on May 4, 1992, nor the Traffic and Transportation meetings on May 14th and June 11, 1992. AE/Liu reported that the Planning Commission has welcomed the TTC to attend the public hearing on May 4th to individually present comments regarding the Plan for Physical Mobility. Chair/Chavers, noting that two of the Commissioners will be absent at the May 14th meeting, suggested April 23, 1992 Page 2 that the Commission consider changing the meeting to May 21, 1992. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. Clem Ziroli, with First Mortgage Corporation, located at 3230 Fallowfield, referring to the "No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m." sign recently posted, across the street from their office to stop car poolers from parking in the, residential neighborhood, stated that, as a result, their employees now have to park further up the street, impacting more of the neighborhood. As residents of the community, they should have the right to park in front of their own building. He suggested that the Commission consider issuing permits to those who have a right to park there. C/Beke noted that, at the March 12th meeting, he had indicated that there should be substantial expression of support, from the people fronting further up the street, if they want the time limit extended in their area. The intention of the action was to get carpoolers out of the area. If the time is changed, it might solve the problem. Kathy Bandak, residing at 3210 Fallowfield, suggested that the time be changed to 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. to discourage the carpoolers, yet allow the First Mortgage Corporation employees to park in front of their building. Terry Robinson, residing at 3184 Fallowfield, complained that people have moved further into the neighborhood to park, and her neighborhood now looks like a parking lot. Chair/Chavers explained to Mr. Ziroli that businesses are expected to park itself within it's boundaries. Also, there are costs associated with a permit parking program. However, a permit wouldn't be needed with a "No Parking 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m." sign. He requested AE/Liu to meet with the residents, and bring back specific recommendations to the Commission, at the next agenda. Dale Farid, residing at 513 Rockridge, complained that because the left turn arrows on southbound Diamond Bar Blvd. and Golden springs is placed over the through lane, and is not aligned with the left turn lanes, his wife went through the red light and received a ticket. He inquired if he could obtain a letter that indicates that.the City acknowledges that there is a problem with the intersection, and that they are in the process of correcting it. April 23, 1992 Page 3 VC/Gravdahl suggested that Mr. Farid take a picture of the intersection. Chair/Chavers requested staff to give Mr. Farid a copy of the March 12th minutes, which indicates that the Commission is aware of the problem with the left turn signals southbound Diamond Bar Blvd. and Golden Springs. NEW BUSINESS: AE/Liu reported that the Commission requested to meet tonight to specifically discuss the Circulation Circulation Element of the General Plan. Element Study Chair/Chavers explained that the Commission intended this to be a working discussion session to formally receive comments. This is the first, and only time, that the Commission has discussed the Circulation Element in a formal setting. He invited the members of the GPAC to give a brief summary on how the Circulation Element got to this point. Mr. Schad, a member of GPAC, stated that one of the prime issues that GPAC is against is the development of Tonner Canyon as a freeway to alleviate traffic. The City of Diamond Bar, per se, won't benefit from the road, but it will serve other communities better if we sacrifice some of the beautiful ways of life in Diamond Bar. Gary Neely, residing at 344 Canoe Cove Dr., an advocate for the construction of the Tonner Canyon Road, noted that the General Plan written by the residents of this community in 1979, indicated that the construction of a Tonner Canyon Road is the only viable solution to the traffic problem in the community. It is also documented, in the traffic study in the Plan for Physical Mobility, that the road should be built. Furthermore, the City of Diamond Bar has a contractual obligation with the tax payers from San Bernardino County to develop a Tonner Canyon Road. He noted that there are alternative routes for a road that will have a minimal amount of disturbance to the Canyon. He indicated the routes to the Commission on the displayed map. He further pointed out that the philosophy to constrict the traffic on Diamond Bar Blvd., and turn Grand Ave. into a toll road, as the solution of the traffic problem in the City of Diamond Bar, is a misplaced philosophy. Don Schad, noting that Tonner Canyon is a significant waterway in itself, stated that the prime objection to having a major freeway, is that it will impact the ecology of the area permanently. April 23, 1992 Page 4 The following are the key issues that the Commission would like to address: reference of Grand Ave. as a super highway; the street extensions of Sunset Crossing, Washington, and Lycoming, and Beaverhead; Tonner Canyon; the street classification of the other side of Sunset Crossing; Diamond Bar High School Parking; park -n - ride issue; constricting Diamond Bar Blvd.; the lack of street classification definitions; and the overall general wording of the Element. Chair/Chavers, referring to page B-2, inquired if the consultant and GPAC discussed how to designate, or classify some of these streets. He explained that if streets are classified as collectors because they function as such (Mountain Laurel, Kiowa Crest, and Maple Hill), then it sets a precedent for what other streets are called that are very similar. He suggested that there be a designation called residential collector. Greg Hummel explained that the classifications, which came from DKS and Associates, are more of a classification relative to street width and the potential to capacity. Chair/Chavers stated that because there is a lack of one of these maps, on page B-3, in the Goals and Policy section in the back of the document, people will rely on the existing conditions, which may not be the direction we want to go. He suggested that we participate in getting the classifications that we want. C/Beke, in response to Mr. Neely's suggestion to review the document line by line, explained that the Commission feels that the concepts are more important. Chair/Chavers explained that the Commission was not encouraged by any part of the City to have this meeting. The Commission was not requested to provide any formal input to the document. This is the first and only time that the Commission has acted upon this Element as a group. C/Beke stated that it is obvious that the Circulation Element is done by planners and environmentalists that have no desire to help circulation in the City. We are deliberately trying to keep traffic out of this City. We are not trying to help regional circulation, even though we use other peoples roads. In referencing page D-3, Strategy 1.3.1, he stated that to not April 23, 1992 Page 5 open up Sunset Crossing is wrong. It is needed for circulation, and should tie into Washington or Lycoming. If you don't want trucks on the road, then it should be posted. C/Cheng indicated that she is in favor of opening Sunset Crossing to help alleviate traffic. VC/Gravdahl stated that if. Sunset Crossing is opened at the other end, over to Grand Ave., it will help alleviate the City of Industries traffic, but it will impact our residential neighborhoods to the east. Even though the document says to cul-de- sac Sunset Crossing, it goes on to describe the benefits to the City of Industry if it is opened up. He suggested eliminating any suggestion of Sunset Crossing. Chair/Chavers stated that, from a Circulation Element perspective, we need to have more specificity in terms of the goals and objectives. Rather than lumping examples together, it should state the specific action that we would like to see pursued. If an extension of Sunset Crossing is necessary to the west of the City boundary, a positive means to prevent intrusion into the neighborhood to the east should be developed. If they can't come up with a positive means to doing that, then the extension doesn't happen. Chair/Chavers suggested that the Commission advise the City Council that the Commission concurs that the opening of Sunset Crossing is ill advised, but in a regional sense it must be done. The Commission discussed the traffic impacts to the community if Sunset Crossing is opened. Chair/Chavers pointed out that the Commission does not have to resolve the mitigation here, but to require it. The General Plan must be defendable. In response to VC/Gravdahl's suggestion to delete mention of cul-de-sacing and the benefits to the City of Industry, Chair/Chavers stated that, as a community, we need to recognize that there is an overall need for that extension, and then protect our community. He pointed out that, in the future conditions, the extension of Sunset Crossing describes all the benefits, and then further on it states that we don't want it. The document needs to be internally consistent. April 23, 1992 Page 6 Following discussion, the Commission concurred that the Future Conditions should be limited to indicate that Sunset Crossing was planned in 1940 to be an extension, and currently it is not built. All other references to what it would do if it were built should be deleted. Chair/Chavers explained that it is appropriate to consider street restrictions on residential street, but you can't reference arterial functions with restrictions. The references to the traffic restrictions should be deleted. The reference of making Grand Ave. a super arterial should be deleted. The definition of super arterial, currently accepted in Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside County, is an arterial with no driveways, signalized access only, with spacing of one quarter mile between the signalized access. He further suggested that the statement on page C-14, last sentence of last paragraph, which reads, "At the same time, if Grand Ave. cannot be accessed from Diamond Bar Blvd., the benefit of the Pathfinder improvement to through traffic is significantly reduced.", should be deleted. C/Beke pointed out that if you make it difficult to travel through the regional highways, then people will travel through the residential neighborhoods. Gary Neely stated that the suggestion for toll roads should be taken out. Chair/Chavers noted that toll roads cannot be developed for roadway improvements. He stated that using Grand Ave. as an example of where we would place toll roads is functionally illegal. C/Cheng suggested that the development of a Tonner Canyon road, that would have minimal impacts to the environment, should be considered. Gary Neely noted that the table on page C-13, indicates that the buildout of Tonner Canyon is a solution to the traffic problem, however, the document states that it shouldn't be done. The road can and should be built in an environmentally safe manner. C/Beke, concurring with Mr. Neely, stated that the document proves that Tonner Canyon is needed. A road can be built in such a way as to blend into the environment. April 23, 1992 page 7 Chair/Chavers stated that transportation corridor is important to the welfare of the remainder of Diamond Bar. From the environmental perspective, we must ask how much environmental damage we are doing, on Grand Ave. to east of Diamond Bar Blvd., by saving Tonner Canyon. We want to balance our needs. It is of no use to us as a community to deny that Tonner Canyon exists. Denying it will costs us. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting to May 21, 1992. Respectively, David Liu Associate Engineer Attest: Todd Chavers Chairman TO: MEETING DATE: FROM: TITLE: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council AGENDA NO. 5-,(' June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 21, 1992 Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant F.Y. 92-93 Investment Policy SUMMARY: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Proposed Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 1992-93, and it's accompanying resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution 92 - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report X Resolution(s) Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: which adopts the FY92-93 Investment Policy. _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Other 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: A k Terrence L. Belang Acting City Manage F:\WP51\AGENDA\C0VER.FRN X Yes_ No X Yes_ No _ Yes X No Yes X No YesX No Linda G. M g uson Senior Accountant CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: F.Y. 1992-93 Investment Policy ISSUE STATEMENT: The State of California requires that municipalities annually adopt a City investment policy (section 53646 of the Government Code). RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution 92- which adopts the FY 92-93 Investment Policy. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Submitted for Council's review and approval is the F.Y. 92-93 Investment Policy and its accompanying resolution. The proposed investment policy basically states the goal of the City's investment activities, the types of investments the City will invest idle funds in, and the monthly reporting requirements. There have been no changes in the investment policy for FY92-93, from the adopted policy for FY91-92. PREPARED BY: Linda G. Magnuson F:\WP51\WORK\AGENDA\AGE-RPT.FRM RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY WHEREAS, it is necessary to annually adopt the City investment policy as provided for in Government Code Section 53646, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar that the attached Statement of Investment Policy (Exhibit A) be adopted as presented herein. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED by the City of Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, this 2nd day of June, 1992. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City Council of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1992, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INVESTMENT POLICY - FY 1991-92 As a General Law City, Diamond Bar operates its pooled idle cash investments under the prudent man rule. This insures that " ..investment shall be made with the exercise of that degree of judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation but for investment considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." (CC #2261) This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities, so long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California and the General Law of the City of Diamond Bar. The City of Diamond Bar strives to maintain the level of investment of all idle funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the Treasurer and investments are allowed in the following media: Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies (and the 'when issued' market) Certificates of Deposit (or Time Deposits), placed with commercial banks and savings and loan companies Bankers Acceptances Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund demand deposits Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Passbook Savings Account demand deposits Money market funds comprised of investments rated in the highest category by Moody's Investors Services Inc. or by Standard & Poor's Corporation. Investment agreements or contracts representing the unconditional obligations of entities (1) the secured long- term debt obligations of which are rated in the top three categories by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or by Standard & Poor's Corporation or (2) the short-term debt obligation of which is rated in the highest category by either of such rating agencies. Tax-exempt obligations rated in either of the two highest rating categories by Standard & Poor's Corporation or Moody's Investor's Service, Inc., including money market funds comprised solely of such obligations. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Investment Policy Page 2 Government and agency paper are the highest quality investments available in terms of safety and liquidity. Certificates of deposit, savings accounts, repurchase agreements, and bankers acceptances are insured or collateralized. Only commercial paper, with A-1 Moody's and P-1 Standard & Poor's ratings, is purchased. Most investments are highly liquid, with the exception of collateralized and insured certificates of deposit held by banks and savings and loans. Maturities are selected to anticipate cash needs, thereby obliterating the need for forced liquidation. Longer-term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturities of five years or less. Diamond Bar attempts to obtain the highest yield obtainable when selecting investments, provided that the criteria for safety and liquidity are met. Ordinarily, through a positive yield curve, (i.e., longer term investment rates are higher than those of shorter maturities), the City attempts to ladder its maturities to meet anticipated cash needs in such a way that carry a higher rate than is available in the extremely short market of 30 days or less. The City operates its investment pool with many State and self- imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks or deal in futures or options. A monthly report of investments will be provided to the City Manager. The required elements of this report are as follows: a) Type of investment b) Institution c) Date of Maturity d) Amount of deposit or cost of security e) Current market value of securities with maturity in excess of twelve months f) Statement relating the report to the Statement of Investment Policy g) Rate of interest h) Statement that there are sufficient funds to meet the next 30 days' obligations The basic premise underlying the City of Diamond Bar's investment philosophy is to insure that money is always available when needed. Terrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA No TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 29, 1992 FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director TITLE: Adoption of Resolutions of Approval for the Tentative Tract Map 51079 and an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 89-551. SUMMARY: The proposed project is for the conversion of a 54 unit apartment complex to a condominium development. The complex is currently under construction and is located at 800 S. Grand Avenue. The Resolutions of Approval have been prepared for this project, as directed by the City Council at the conclusion of the May 5, 1992 public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolutions of Approval. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report XX Resolution(s) — Ordinances(s) — Agreement(s) Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed by the City Attorney? XX Yes No 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental Majority impact been assessed? 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? XX Yes — No Which Commission? Planning commission Yes _ No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? Report discussed with the Yes No following affected departments: Building Dept. and Engineering Dept. — R EWED BY: IJasDeStefanoityevAssistant rrence L. Belanger City Mana er unDelopment Director MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. June 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions 92- and , for oval of Tentative Tract Map 51079 and an amendment to CUP 89-551,h a arequest to subdivide a 4.5 acre site into one lot with 54 air space units for a condominium conversion and an amendment to the CUP to allow the conversion. ISSUE STATEMENT: The City Council directed staff to prepare conditions and Resolutions of Approval for the Tentative Tract Map 51079 and an Amendment to CUP 89-551. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolutions 92- _ and _ approving Tentative Tract Map 51079 and an Amendment to CUP 89-551. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: This project will provide all required public improvements as a part of the development and is required to pay all necessary impact fees including but not limited to school fees, traffic mitigation fees, parks and recreation contributions, and Department of Fish and Game fees. BACKGROUND: In the course of the several public hearings, the City Council reviewed the project and directed staff to incorporate several revisions including intensification of landscaping, the addition parking spaces, security provisions, and added storage areas. Additionally, the CC&R's were directed to reflect a prohibition on patio storage. Staff has reviewed the amended plans and CC&R's which conform to the Council directives. The Council, at the conclusion of receiving public testimony at the May 5, 1992 public hearing, directed staff to prepare conditions of approval and Resolutions for consideration. Staff has complied and the attached Resolutions have been prepared in response to Council directives. PREPARED BY: Robert Searc Associa a Planner AATR 51(79.Cc CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. S TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 28, 1992 FROM: James DeStefano. Communitv Development Director TITLE: Adoption of Resolutions of Approval for the Certification of Master Environmental Impact Report 91- 2 and approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 47851 and 48487. SUMMARY: The Resolutions of Approval have been prepared for the two (2) above listed tentative tract maps. The applications submitted request approval of a residential subdivision for the development of 63 lots within SEA No. 15 and certification of a Master Environmental Impact Report. The City Council had several Public Hearings on this application in order to receive public testimony and to review the project. At the conclusion of the April 21, 1992 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare conditions of approval and Resolutions for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council certify Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) 91-2 and approve Vesting Tentative Tracts 47851 and 48487. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other: Mitigation Monitoring Program 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No Which Commission? Planning Commission 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Building and Safety Department and Engineering Department VIEWED BY - (140 s _,r F/04W4 errence L. Belanger Ja es DeStefano Acting City Manager C mmunity Development Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT rt"DIzI.rMkiRIF MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions of Approval for the Certification of Master Environmental Impact Report 91-2 and approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 47851 and 48487. ISSUE STATEMENT The applicants, Diamond Bar Associates and Dr. Al LaPeter have submitted a request for approval of a residential subdivision for development of 63 lots within SEA No. 15 and certification of Master Environmental Impact Report 91.2. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council certify Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) 91-2 and approve Vesting Tentative Tracts 47851 and 48487. FINANCIAL SUMMARY The applicants are required to offset impacts related to development by providing infrastructure and fees. Additionally, a monetary contribu- tion for traffic mitigation and a Tonner Canyon Study is required. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Resolutions of Approval have been prepared for the two (2) above listed tentative tract maps. The applications submitted request approval of a residential subdivision for the development of 63 lots within SEA No. 15 and certification of a Master Environmental Impact Report. The City Council has conducted Public Hearings on this application January 21, 1992 and continued the hearings to January 28, 1992, March 3, 1992 and to the April 7 and 21, 1992 meeting in order to receive public testimony and to review the project. At the conclusion of the April 21, 1992 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare conditions of approval and Resolutions for the May 26, 1992 meeting. The public hearing was continued June 2, 1992 and all attachments have been revised to reflect the City Council direction. Prepared By: Rob Searcy MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM VESTING TENTATIVE TRACTS 47851 AND 48487 Prepared for: City of Diamond Bar Department of Planning 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91763-4177 Contact James De Stefano, Planning Director Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates 606 South Olive Street, Suite 600 Los Angeles, California 90014 (213) 622-4443 May 29, 1992 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 a a 0 0 w ° 0 0 A A A A Q a ao ap a .y �• a O O a v CA O R as A4 q$ ' °� A w ae 1-4 0 c O .. .b y e0 b 0 a� W p ea y c y ap .2 o O � y c`� w • � p O � � � y R1' � eo O.0 �'O .!2 a a 4di a -d o Qav �M a'. _�p0E co LCL . V L+ (fS L y .r y G f4-4 M CZ m 0 Me •cz C.tiy C� [ -JC7 y •� W CC a to ;.� U E U Q ° p cz i a� C 'd GO 4 C7 � O eip •y � r4 o a N .6 6. a 0 0 C ar. A � A •a± CC CQ � :5 0 0 •� bA bA ice. ♦+ y 00 Q C p .�+ .0EL ca to bq bq `" O a y cC > O U y V U O. G QE 4 ba •'.7 Ci ryr Qai •[_O O r�� v� � CG. -r 6: O "ny O �y L � ' :� V Cy V y ea en 'D C Q y '' N? 5 O p y •� •+r g`� �r"1 � •O Q O vC.� 7 pCp 9s S'c�a".)"' 0 • •� wp O . ' I C .oCCQvn . CU � CU O•y c�Cd.�,' o�, .caa` O Ay tj Cl. O 00 �yUv- .yCO ci64 �0O oe N 3 3 3 0 0 0 o c o C C f� ❑ � o. a A v y m aq U p C nD o tw c0 04 E [ E cc E c eo a.14 o_ L. i. Q 6y • C4 0 i J8 O s a U ~ 3 U .> h '50.� p ,a� v N N _ .r 4 S `� ��.• Car tCr y �" r' � rj w o `QCQ R h py E p v o rtf G..r= r .� y U tw 0 IJ VJ �•' Q% L jam•' p y •�^ N i.'" y a] O ul _ _ _ W UI 0O4J" O X •w � y > � y `. � � y U y � • 1�.. ...•� o cA eoo = ° ons C �•c w ts�3 C y, o v C �•" bq G �. pp O U C C C (� �O w� A .-4 A11Ro its C._ N� caa 3 a. e4 .2rcaUcoo O v Nv Wo ea .!! 4N C U _O p r -i 41 21 .r 4-4 ro } J 41 Q rl rn IV � � 3 3 3 a a r''' a c �a V ea p W R •_E C � C C E+ ;02 b Gy C ca oo❑ CL R6. p fir O w was Jaz ;?4-4 N N A w �" C «+ v i U O w •� cOp R C y C �• ` O WD R O O vOi � R %• '� 3� y RS ^ . .. Cco •� '[3 y y C R O A R •� '^ $. bo •C Cl. R � � aR+ � r.. O •4' � � � cd U +' • r� Cd �.. 3I0 E LE oYL .0 U 0 ° b W .0 �►. y c -= W C :J bo R Q y R O a~ R � �= o Cap o o � «� a v �_ � 3 en � � c � � •� CA U �'' co � = C Q ^^ppR O lao .O eC CA Q h O R O cd R> O C �. O .+ C Q v CczIV a R C _ .IV C1. w C C poG. p ea C�"iD v cT w bq O cpo G. Q y IV Ln •V "" � 0 CV a C 3 � 'c a, .0 y C cCC � � � � w 0 fya iyr LV � 0. A cc ba 0 [ to b ro yw� cC •� M co LIU 4" O ca m C1 w i•� c� O 0 w "G 0 p C h •y w O. R a E 0 0 •� y R w O � C v� CO Ir a $. a & '� � � � ~ W a & Ln •V "" � ns ,oEl CV a tl y C •� � a, .0 y C cCC � � 0 [ O �v�+ yw� cC •� M 4" O ca C1 w i•� c� O O. 0yyj O'U "G p C h •y w O. im. m�a.� 3 E vn ..+ N y R V] O � C v� CO Q Q .Sl. � .+ '� � � � ~ W � � C'. CQ � •'� y a a '�i Cd a arA cto V • � O U Ln Fo QA V U P •'p m N O O b C O .❑ .—. y � � 'fly .bp a+ CC O .� bq h �+ y a+ a+ i •� � n.n � ' �•. V ny y a� 14 w 3 ba CO h O v, w C O U P 'G G �+' C O y C L CO U .V a+ i •� y ba CO h O v, eip E aON cam.= 0o�a�--� _ R as c -'•v o �w 0$o-o 6 bQ. O 14 CO C4 M . o o C "C .b u cC u 0 c20 o C. j 0 G • [ y •ir~r •� •� O CCO C W O ami V 4 VJ •� .w' CG 6" �y Q F 0 w � � � h y y 0 O � •U � O � � y � �O CJ [ o o r� .� m a C C W O C ❑ 4 C GA o p b�:3.- � ceo� aCy 8Z -z: °o�.c oy an °� oy R -d �U.m a o' a� ay-� 3 c a0 °,Qom $..`� [� o Qc°"s .6;_ a.� 3.�y > �,°= •o ol6. LIU io a� ro o h c b 3 � �' y ° c° •3 'v a '� 3 '�� ���0+�..,8•.. °�'�c,.,pp bac .s�a��..co.y�...� 8 sC13 0 in, 7E. r= 'ate r- 8 1. o0 �•o air" c a c ate' v cto c yv ena� a� y aw'C'>y aOi E 7i 0 0 ~ LW a .fl is cc �' it 3 IQii s. ° e�O O 'n. to v' GL coo c) ate.+ V e]" ` y Q ++ '� a y `n c4 y j� •,� +� b .� " i00 i •� � .� y Q � ❑ QV�� � Li cc O R . � aS cv � � O C .. � R C � •• � '-' � 'y 0 bo p Cow Q -W cc s .. b Q ao c w 0 c � H N N Q � Q •� .r {r az p ce C >+ C bA 0 GO w Q o Q d toi0. M C ea try w C.. N °�[CA c > > E h u 1.a ti yCL _� � '� a� � y oac 3 � � y � o N � �•c °'� aci = �.o ��' c'nCg y .7 CQ cuR c a 3c�c >°� _ °8�;yvc w A 0' �, ° O :C Q' C 'L7 ' 3 y R R C) � :? � •c 3 .c .v .+ Q Op v_ ar C TJ n cQC y O Au Q w � .. • Q eo Q Cu0 .+C C N [ N ^p • ^ • - Q% to o = O c a� oaci v ��-°��' ... m A ° o W a[i a o E oh � Q o, n. e V a� a. ca �.AE Cg�Qa� 2. E DC7 E c'cC7 to w C �WU � eo a ao c c dq L. ca O w 0 C.' U GC r0/ ca .ter' h H O 0 0 .a ° a . 0 c o�-oc°,o �cOv o a❑aCn°i D `ai''r °a'owy �`°•%�° o, t° E ,3 co`°CAc°N ti LW a=teap [ a `*0Cto•; ca _ i y oo ca �E 'bcc O �' 6, WW °A �a 3 ami = c moo' c [ t^ a Mc °� Lw o 0 Vl C RS C C.i i C h ot,..,C� .- Dir C G. �".0 y y C u w a° qqac �S a c v,.o t:•v meq cc m 0 CZ� 3 eo?'0 ow m Q `� o �' .c�.L. aLW o d 3 ate' E MO R ❑ E `• -[ `" y E � c. , w, L• o .cG�� C eC ,p w cz 0 C E m r cC 7 .- 0� "G 0 ca CooyN�rr (~ m �' JC • 0 L 0 .w+ • tw c� • � o 0 cd 0 y /A� 0 0 0 0 co C4 y,ba 4 — vi a L. y > 0 jy N "4C. Rye a"�oa °�°"°6. 0i � ro�a�'R ° - w CC :^ is •L: 2 p., L. y y O •O " y .� ao .Y ami 'm U a a y �' Q -° C° L. o Q a '~ o E �� a�° 0 eno U au i° Zvi o o•0 o y�c w �... w= t4 co w w � a 75 +•+ '� 0 Q W 4 � bn C ro ro � a� C o .fir Qom+ y a [ caUd C C A° aou as A 0 0 o�vco O a h to N 0 a.+ Q, y it 0 0 r j C a C V bA r_O j cd `% LLUi ca Li _ . •� Q �•� ri � V7 � •� ro :D a'°a� y 83�ao v0-8a�i. to Q oo fJ po C� y q p b GL C w U c3 u 03 Mc o 0 'v y C WE LM �Go3 ri:� O �c',a.��y H°°eco C -[ CLO C � C C cC a o y a 0 C � a � A ao a on � �o eo � O C O � v � a C C � a� 40 .-� � � .ti o a� b • O ++ «+ yy C • � ..�. �i c4 � C.' H ro y O. y � � y m a v� C � '�' C •a7i V C e� C aN+ 3 C •w � � � v� a Q 0--s bA a 0 Q w O Q 0 y L ti o a, :, �? C •� 'o @yam v $ Ei v z � g �0 u ZO 0 u�6m c��nHoaacz.v�C7aHx ;� a� CA 0'060 •O b �•[ c0 a• '� � •y y ca yy� C 0 C Y O.C M Q . " G 00 w ro O tu CR O U � g Q N y y. n M c t4 Mo � � a c ° c 8 � °, a A 0'060 •O b �•[ c0 a• '� � •y y ca yy� C 0 C Y O.C M Q . " G 00 w ro O tu CR O U � g Q N y y. n M CU d4 bop C bb ao C a 0 q q q c a 5 ba C b al Ocz U � O y U U C6 Rf ca a ca y •p r(n .,A � y+ 'O A 'p O � � � � iC� y0 �CC+ y ri N tV N N N N N U w �@0� .° -op C9 c o f o06. w w C e ++ �+ Sy0 O Oco b0 C -V p EO p c0 C k Y p 00 O 171 � ' � .� � � �' y y � • •.� � Q.% m!u C C O } C1 w O ,v� O yr O N C. p O O . � y 00 �. U C O � p d^ cE U. �' b L' O '0O O .r v w0 O R w O x h x t -°o a p4 p� W C7 20 N N M U U u u y 'O O y >, O O .y+ �+ cyo w A O 'd '� 0 A 0►fir r..+ bA b .� r. orb•~ -dam as y a°i � °'�_,•eA= °' � `� � � Lv 0 La 00 6. cz ^ may ° W •� ad i•"r. O rA CO 0 ca L Leicc 10 Q y .i' LO .L .� H y 'b CC •.+ `n i cC t-. Qi 5 _ a� bD �6. � GOA y y A w O C O, Q6 0 y C 7 C C ... Ca " a+ y C U (g E � c (XG N a w o. �+ 0 C Oy v b4 d y y eo O ca a Ln .� •c w � moo° P- M W m co A A to tA m O y 4c°cz cu w0 v C P-4 N N M U U u u y 'O O y >, O O .y+ �+ cyo w A O 'd '� 0 A 0►fir r..+ bA b .� r. orb•~ -dam as y a°i � °'�_,•eA= °' � `� � � Lv 0 La 00 6. cz ^ may ° W •� ad i•"r. O rA CO 0 ca L Leicc 10 Q y .i' LO .L .� H y 'b CC •.+ `n i cC t-. Qi 5 _ a� bD �6. � GOA y y A w O C O, Q6 0 y C 7 C C ... Ca " a+ y C U (g E � c (XG N a w o. �+ 0 C Oy v b4 d y y eo O ca a Ln w V O 3 w O �O y co on � ego .b p p ' 0 by cC ca ca cO R _, w U ❑ J eE 7 .14 {r twuw a� a s ►� N w a 119 U 00 U U 1.4 N - p v� n N +' o $ o w ob c 3 � a� •� ami $ y � p a+ cu � .� 6n � • CC � Qi Q� Q. y � � C • � CO ml CO 7 cC O cG a co .� y 0 p 0JCc ,C o cc cr. ° a iz to 6w c:� cc �E cSP .5� �w .sp b i� M� 0 y V1 Iii o o c x [mM� z a� x aa�h C'.. F�1 � Cb H w F', ate+' • L" ��' � ++ � w U O C C N U ce y y C o�•�'�:Co�ca� cs • ^ .c .0.�.o8w•�ti3� 4 ° a. 0.M.o�6o0�� 3 a. 4 w c o C L 0 A il y cd O � a Q CO y yCQ� CO °j 0 C L. V Ir V ate+' • L" ��' � ++ � w U O C C N U ce y y C o�•�'�:Co�ca� cs • ^ .c .0.�.o8w•�ti3� 4 ° a. 0.M.o�6o0�� x 101 w N U N U N U co ri N I L) 44.0 ,I p O O O� U N 'Zi N ow ,4 N N O a U rl tn p .t j b� ri �rcs+P 0 N 00 N 4 U N N o 0>O rOrdao W L L.d p C G (3 V V w N ++ U C U C CA y co �A A r7A w CA cd CC C6 ce U 03 bA 1U+ w O p U CC G c Q C O O .12 O CO. U 0 O El E 0 O U O 0.5 O C0 C C1'0 C P4 O L) 'o ►`J .�cz N U N U N U co ri N I L) 44.0 ,I p O O O� U N 'Zi N ow ,4 N N O a U rl tn p .t j b� ri �rcs+P 0 N 00 N 4 U N N o 0>O rOrdao as w A k y 3 3 W5 o o w O ~.y H V tr Q Lr GC 1�1 1•d Iii fel Fri bA CC � y b • L RS cz co O O O O O U U U C: C C C h ;n PLO as a; a. N N W) U U U U � T+ cocl a w(u (u - c U W oyc a•.r�a..8 °'>�❑a w L •d 4 + •y Q"' GL A .O Cy o y 6d N •.-. ,... y z p,Q C•+ 4 I I �� `"�c� •c men" a�:.'S�°��� cz Q O 4WWL tr 1r y+ Q Q L•. Cd .+ 72G Vl ..i Q O y O C e0 747 O G C z `' 0 tg �"� w 'O y cc L' Q Q a� � o �. �b p a�' �►� y'm a a;? y�j:�cc w cc tw In r- 0 632 0 C q Q Q% pq wcc L R' b Oo C CCA O [, G C it r S.cyC Q � Q .r �,� • •'Ci LL r0 z O c� K i�r �- Q,% � N a v� O� (11 i� Vi A "A 5 �C U L1. C6 as 3 3 3 O A A ro .r y � R c R O E p aA .� ac N � N M CQ ¢ ¢ N U Q� V2 VD ,� C V C Q � y w O co wro�+ «. y _ `�� y v- N w Q❑ y p d "O `c� f", !� pp • w�.' y yy y a J y 6" ` 0 C°u VJ Qwi•a'rr. y ��j ''% LIZ M ro 9r ^u i,79 y eyC C! Ci Vi = Q y Q C 0 V im" y .2 w a . V ° ' U ° on .0 - a Eso j. o ° bn o a E •C Q7 Q C6 ^r @ y T G/1 @ CQ 'C Z5w U W .o O sp OCa w C .. U ►r y ,0 O tr CSC V @ " 4. Oq M H '- „" ro y cC o v w C V� Q 0. =%Fq 4� O CC p y C O 3 a O N O % •+ C �'„ L' �L C ° Si L7 C." 3 �, y ro Ir . ro y L y Q Z .-w .. N , y ..0 C ca C 8 p .. =— = IA— 3 3 3 3 3 �; 7 CO VC C WS+ .0 .i C `n • ~ N ti. 0 0 0 fA cti z � � � U w � cC � � O 'ti �..� Q A Q c � — C) 0 y� •aU.+ y YVi Vi h •� {Q O O U V cz R Y W C., Y "••' W .� W a CL'= y cC O RO C U qq tw R L" cc 0�a N m1. N ,� es G� Ow N � O b0 rj C4'S GL i.. L• +, C cC C eO C, C C a r6 �. U N , y ..0 C ca C 8 p .. =— = IA— C= O� p O Uea O t} �; 7 CO VC C WS+ .0 .i C `n • ~ N ti. C c7 C fA � O RS O `�' .`.• U � 0.0 �: � w � cC � � O 'ti �..� v� •v o a ;n c � — C) 0 Q. C cz R Y W Y "••' W .� W a CL'= y � O y o a Ov � 'fl 0�a N ,� es G� Ow N � � C Q, • � � cv GL i.. L• +, y N tr y� U O v W H C v 3 U �. w U h h V ro U y C N p N @ �. U 3 U W C C U0U C,'. •LE C•C +faQcdwh . ut V C O O (A fl.. pU Q Lz 3 A ce •C w lyi Q +�.a. y b y y co N j••j y 0 S 0 3 3 3 3 � •� U w w C 1..i Ir �' cz W 'j • H cE CO cn co A A A A A A 3 V C� U O CC C w O cCa A > cy a g cy p, a EVE P ri CQ Ci Cc G cc y Q y 0 A ".� 0 A '.� o A •w a � N N r+ N M C G h y �+ C •C 4i Q O o00o U 6d •id W O � V y � (Q C � O 00 a u y w W e1a� y"03ej Q > S JA C q y y ea b C. w 0 0 O o a�y� w�E Wto ca V¢'vc8 U v rr o d ,� o0 _ CL oob (u �(uvm ��b -'Q y a Z tr�(n E-�oov� 3 Q2h a, v�v�L1C. � o CO a a CIO `4 o c O 0 a �cn A A to Lr b b +V A a bD C C c3 C G C C .� 0,0.5 00•S ou.y C c0 O y0 yy�� a C a 0 a O Ar C3. Q '0 Q N � N Q O O p r W ° C 4) = co W 0 w °U•i y Vtu O `'+ O � U •, eta � `� v C � � ^ •• n � cUC yp .�" UC d v� cd wy rj" o q0> ° o acat� CL co �, ao a a� c •� � c :� �a ca ,� y o 500 ,.. � i .. b C �� U •� � O b C O. O U 'G .� .... v � � aq O � •.+ 00� > G�zl �-= �' :? � aiL °"❑ �•3 004'0 o 00 °v; �•� woo y eva ay0° a s ° °'-°c g W i3' +••� CQ '.�. •7 a >, O .'�. R C cO W ^ H �r ar I..i �Iruy' Q%° y ��� �c�5� .2RIM a V R:ca e > cc •cu 64 �•� y •� 4 y b .'.i ° R1 M N E 5 A S V Ir a• O t4 GOC O Q 'G MOM''F rl ed _ c �j 3 Or ° o r � � �Uo� cR aa��oa�a� E-� a o N C V C c 0 0 0 � � cc C w cocc CLO A E 5 A S V Ir a• O t4 GOC O Q 'G MOM''F rl ed _ c �j 3 Or ° o r � � �Uo� cR aa��oa�a� E-� a o N C V 2 Cs a C c � R _ N td C U O ty� NQ•^O,U ro N pq � •� a a °o0�BE � 0 yU�a�ic�oi ❑ a� La a� C oA.S 2 Cs \ d ia . \ � k 1.12 •�� k �� 2 A 2p r ° 2 ■ © © � § & � 7 � Q � � an d 2p/\ k k 44 ° 2 � � k � \ � ° 6w W 3 0 2 k Ln N MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Terrence Belanger, Acting City Manager FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Revisions to the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 47851 and 48487. Please revise the MMP to reflect the following amendments: * pg. 24, Development Review Section, Pursuant to Chapter 22.72.720.020(A)(1), of the City of Diamond Bar Development Review Ordinance, the proposed project shall be subject to development review prior to issuance of a c building permit. The Development Review application shall contain the following information: (etc) y.1....r> f. ��ses9' NOTICE OF DETERMINATION x Office of Planning & Research FROM: City of Diamond Bar 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 21660 E. Copley Dr. 1190 Sacramento, CA 95814 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ORIGINAL x Public Services Division of the County Clerk LA COUNTY CLERK County Courthouse, Room 204 JU 0 41992 111 North Hill Street M Los Angeles, CA 90012 By �.J Depu[y :CT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code act Title VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 48487 AND CERTIFICATION OF MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC 'ORT NO. 91-2 e Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Area Code/Number/Extension Submitted to Clearinghouse) SCHO 9001086 ect Location ?RLY OF THE' INTERSECTION OF WAGON TRAIN LN. AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF WINDMILL ROAD ect Description DT SUBDIVISION ON -.20 -ACRES FOR CUSTOM HOME DEVELOPMENT is -to advise that the City of- Diamond Bar has approved --the above ribed project on June 2, 1992 and has made the following rminations regarding the above described project: The project will, X will not have a significant effect on the environment. X An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaratiori was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Mitigation measures X were, were not made a condiiton of the approval of the project. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, X was not adopted for this project. EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be nined at 21660 East Copley Srive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Received for Filing and Posting at OPR: Transmitted June 3, 1992 51) 1 VIA -7, DeStefa4o, birector of Pla s:determ.not ME V � L 1 fA V! IA to E9 � 8 0 0 0 0 LO p t17 LO co en J m 0 IN i` '000,0 00 >s \off' NOTICE OF DETERMINATION off::,,e of Planning & Research FROM: City of Diamond Bar 140( Tenth Street, Room 121 21660 E. Copley Dr. 1190 6aca amento, CA 95814 Diamond BMK9INFREN765 L.A COUNTY CLERK pub:.:ic Services Division of the County Clerk ('cu: ity Courthouse, Room 204j� 41992 :.1.L North Hill Street Lc s .Angeles, CA 90012 BY Deputy C.T: J?J.li.ng of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 0i ::he Public Resources Code c=t? VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 47851 AND CERTIFICATION OF MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL RsP P. NC . 91-2 CL:ar.ir.house Number Contact Person Area Code/Number/Extension ;ui»n .tted to Clearinghouse) S. ;H# 90010505 and # 90010861 �ccat ion JF THS INTERSECTION OF WAGON TRAIN LN. AND THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF WINDMILL DR. ��T' )escx iption C--:,UYDIV1SLON- FOR CUSTOM HOME DEVELOPMENT - 3.s to advise that the City of Diamond Bar has approved the above following ribcd project on JUNE 2, 1992 and has made the rminations regarding the above described project: Tht> project will, X will not have a significant effect on the environment. X An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project J pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Mitigation measures X were, were not made a condiiton of the approval of the project. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, X was not adopted for this project. EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be :Wined at 21660 East Copley Srive, Suite 190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. e Received for Filing and Posting at OPR: 6_0 &Q ve s DeStef s:determ.not irector of Planning Transmitted June 3, 1992 . J�d p po 0 N w co �69 co N to c m c C� N m O N N 0 � O 3 a to 5 � o ro � C � N O c F a m m m E ¢ o -E LL u R r ' o o m - E o d L E x U= w m u N d J N U .� N D c o E 4 m O E - o tj B L _J m - 4 IUDC C � Q c m o p 0 se w Z U_ 0 w 7 Mu U w ccJ Q O F- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. 5 `q TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 28, 1992 FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director TITLE: Extension of Time Request for Tentative Tract Map No. 31977 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a one year extension of time in order to complete the conditions of approval for apreviously approved 22 lot/ 16 acre subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the request for an extension of time via the attached Resolution of Approval. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report X Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Other: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _. No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority No 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes — No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes Which Commission? Planning Commission No 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes — Report discussed with the following affected departments: Engineering Department VIEWED BY: 4I rrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager fl�4 DeStefano ,unity Development Director CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Extension of Time request for Tract Map 31977. ISSUE STATEMENT: The applicant is requesting a one year extension of time in order to complete the conditions of approval for a previously approved 22 lot/16 acre subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that attached Resolution for the Extension Tract 31977. The tentative map would a result of the extension granted. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: the City Council approve the of Time request for Tentative expire November 16, 1992 as The request for the Extension of Time for Tentative Tract 31977 was heard by the City Council at the public hearing held May 11, 1992. At the conclusion of public testimony, the City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution approving the extension of time with conditions. Included within the conditions, are requirements that the tentative map comply with current development regulations related to the land form grading as required by the Hillside Management Ordinance. Elimination of common driveways, and incorporating the maintenance and upkeep of the project site. The appropriate resolution has been prepared and forwarded to the City Council for approval. All of the above listed conditions for the extension of time have been incorporated into the resolutions. PREPARED BY: Robert Searcy, Associate Planner A:\EX31977.3TY T UOT40P 'AlbuTpaoOOV •ueTd Teaeuag aATgeaedo UP SxOPT aea PUOMPTa 3o AgTO aqq luoTgpjodj00UT quaoaa sqT 3o asneoaa (TTT) aea puomeTa go AgTO aqq uTggTM 'UOTgeoTTddv gooEgns aqg buTpnTOUT 'SUOTgPOTTddP guamdOTanap oq 91geOTTdde ATquaaanO MOu saTabuV SOq 90 A4un00 aqg 90 9po0 quamdoTanaa aqq UTPgUOo 'papuamp sP 'apo0 Aqunoo saTabuY soZ aqq 90 ZZ PUP TZ saTgTs •aea puOmRTa 90 A4TO aqq JO saoueuTpao aqq se apo0 Aqunoo SaTabUV S0q aqq 'aoueutpao Aq 'pagdops aPa pUOMRTa 30 A4TO aqg 3o ITounoo A4TO aqq 'aaggPaaags-PTua03TTP0 30 agPgS aqq go uoTgPaodaoo TPdTOTunuz pazTuebao ATnp P se pagsTTgPgsa SPM aPa pUOMPTa 30 A4TO aqq '686T '8T TTady uo (TT) „'UOTgeoTIddv,, aqq se oq paaaagea aq TTPgs LL6T£ 'oN dvN gOPaS, aATgPquas bUTpaPbaa gsanbaa UOTsuagxa goeCgns aqg 'uoTgnTosag STgg UT aagJPuTaaag •uoTgnTosag STgq 3o aT4T4 aqq UT pagTaosap SP LL6T£ •oN dvK gopal aATgPquay buTpaebea 9wT4 go uoTsuagxa aeaA (T) auo P aoi uoTgPoTTddP UP p9TT3 9ao3o49a9q SPg 'PTUa0JTTPO 'xaPd A9a9qu0W 'anuaAV UTaa9gd0W ggnog 5691 '(aag3PUT9a9q „4UP3TTddv„) oNIX MauQNK 3o 3Teg9q UO ''ONI 'aNIq 'd 'M (T) •sTagzoau . IV • ,aosuzsZ Zuoddas xi soxlami,a smixyK axy Imimo,amyo 'sszsaxy soz ,ao xamoo 'uta axoxvIa I aAIaa aNxzxsz am aAIua Hsnua'Ioo l aroma x,Luvxouo mia"3S 2virmaxso azsvoai 'saws (9t) NS3ZBIS NO NOISIAlaans 10z (ZZ) OZZ-xsN3Ms V UO,a LL6tS 'ON dVK ZOTIZ sAIZVZNSZ ROJ ZKIZ aO NOISNZIXS NK oNIAouddY UVa aNOKVIa ,ao Axio ass ,ao zloxaoo xZlo axs ,ao NOlsnzossu x -Z6 'ON NOIlagOSSu Baa PUP saTOTTod 'MET ajgQDTTddp pup suoTgpjnbaa PUP sajna 'SOTOTTod TPquouigapdap AgTO 'sapOD AgTD aqq '40Ta4sTQ buTuOZ ajgPDTTddP aqq 'uoTgnjosag STgq 3o squauzaaTnbaa TTK (q) •Tpnoadds sTgq go suotgTpuoO aqq TTP sgdaoos pup aousgdaoov 3o 4TAPPT33V up quauxgasdea quamdOTanaQ AgTunmmoo aqq gqTM p9TT3 spg Agaadoad aqq 3o aauMo aqq go anTgsquasaadaa pazTaoggnP ATnp P TTqun asodand Aup aoj anT409339 aq qou TTPgs 6LOTS •ON dpY1 gopas anTgpquas 3O IPnoaddv sTgs (p) :suoTgTpuoO buTMOTTo3 aqg oq gaaCgns uoT490TTddy aqq sanoaddP Agaaaq TTounoo AgTo STgq 'utaaaq ggaoj qas suoTsnTouoo pup sbuTpuTj aqq uo passe •£ •saoupuTpao TVDOT pup MET agpgg Jo squauzaaTnbaa ajgsOTTddp aaggO TTs gqTM saTTdmoo uTaaaq pauoTgTpuOO pus pasodoad sp uotgpoTTddV aqy (p) •upTd TPaauaD auq ggTM guagsTsuoOuT Aj8gQMTgTn ST asn pasodoad aqq 3T upTd TPaauao pagdopp aangnj aqg gqTM 9Ou9a9ja94uT ao Oq quautTagap TsiquPgsgns 30 AgTTTgsqoad ou ao aTggTT ST aaags (0) •paaapTsuoO buTaq Tpsodoad upTd Tpaauao aqq gqTM 4u94STSu00 aq TTTM pasodoad uOTgoe aqq gPgg AgTTTgpqoad algPuospaa P sT ajagy (q) S aPS puoMaTQ 90 A4TO xaaTD AgTD 'ssabang 2puAq :sssssy T'8'9 fiQ\IiLL6T6ZS\110T\S :SHaSNgN ZIJNnoD :asNIVISSV :suaaNgN ZIONnOD :INssgV :SgggNSN ZIDNnoo :ssoN :suasNgN ZIDNnoo :saAv :940n TTPO TToa buTMOTTo3 aqq Ag 'Z661 ' 30 Alp 9q4 uo pTaq avg puOmvTQ 90 A4TO 9q4 30 TTOunOD A4TO 6q4 3o buT488M JPTnb9J aqq 4s pagdopa PUP panojddE 'passed saM uoTgnTosag buTobazo3 aqq gagq AjT4aao Agaaaq op 'aag puoiupTQ 30 A4TO 9q4 3o xaaTO A4TO 'SS39gng VQNAZ 'I RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31977 FOR A TWENTY-TWO (22) LOT SUBDIVISION ON SIXTEEN (16) ACRES, LOCATED GENERALLY BETWEEN CROMARTY DRIVE, GOLDRUSH DRIVE AND LEYLAND DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) W. R. LIND, INC., on behalf of ANDREW KING ("Applicant" hereinafter), 1595 South McPherrin Avenue, Monterey Park, California, has heretofore filed an application for a one (1) year extension of time regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 31977 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject extension request regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 31977 shall be referred to as the "Application." (ii) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. Thereafter, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted, by ordinance, the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Titles 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code, as amended, contain the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, including the subject Application, within the City of Diamond Bar. (iii) Because of its recent incorporation, the City of Diamond Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, action 1 was taken on the Application, as to General Plan consistency, pursuant to the terms and provisions of California Government Code § 65360. (iv) On March 23 and April 13, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the Application and, upon conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution recommending approval of the Application to this City Council. (v) On May 19, 1992, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above -referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of fact set forth above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The City of Diamond Bar is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Plan. 2 (b) There is a reasonable probability that the action proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered. (c) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan. (d) The Application as proposed and conditioned herein complies with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this City Council hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: (a) This Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 51079 shall not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized representative of the owner of the property has filed with the Community Development Department an Affidavit of Acceptance and accepts all the conditions of this approval. (b) All requirements of this Resolution, the applicable Zoning District, the City Codes, City departmental policies, rules and regulations and applicable law, policies and 3 regulations of any local agency with jurisdiction thereof shall be complied with by the Applicant. (c) The Tentative Tract Map No. 31977 shall be redesigned to comply with all requirements of the City's grading Ordinance No. 14 (1990). (d) The extension of time request hereby is granted to and including November 16, 1992 only. (e) The subject Tentative Tract Map shall be redesigned to preclude use of "joint -use" driveways serving two (2) lots. (f) Applicant shall remove all trash, garbage, junk, debris and dead vegetation from the site and shall keep the same clean, neat and in a weed -free condition. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Applicant at its address per City records. 1992. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 4 Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1992, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Cler City of Diamond Bar S\1011\TT31977R\DB 6.8.1 5 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 26, 1992 FROM: David G. Liu, Associate Engineer TITLE: Storm Drain Bond Exoneration for Private Drain Number 1668 Unit II on Tract 41305 and Private Drain Number 1890 on Tract 42533 constructed by Presley of Southern California. SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to exonerate the surety bonds posted for a) Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II, located on Tract No. 41305 (Montefino Drive) and b) Storm Drain No. 1890, located on Tract No. 42533 (Estoril Drive). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of bonds posted for a)Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II on Tract 41305 in the amount of $6,700 and b)Storm Drain No. 1890 on Tract 42533 in the amount of $8,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the Los Angeles County, Fremont Indemnity Company, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Presley of Southern California of the City Council's action. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: _ Public Hearing Notification _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) X Other:L.A. Co. Board of Supervisors' Acceptance Letters SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? s Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L.Belanger, Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Exoneration of Bonds for Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II on Tract No. 41305 (Monefino Drive) and Storm Drain No. 1890 on Tract No. 42533 (Estoril Drive). ISSUE STATEMENT This report requests the exoneration of faithful performance bonds posted for Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II on Tract 41305 and Storm Drain No. 1890 on Tract 42533 constructed by Presley of Southern California. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of bonds posted for a)Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II on Tract 41305 in the amount of $6,700 and b)Storm Drain No. 1890 on Tract 42533 in the amount of $8,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the Los Angeles County, Fremont Indemnity Company, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Presley of the City Council's action. FINANCIAL SUMMARY This action has no impact on the City's 1991-1992 budget. BACKGROUND The construction of these storm drains on Montefino Drive and Estoril Drive has been completed. They have been transferred to Los Angeles County for maintenance and the fees involved in the transferrance procedure have now been fully paid by the Principal, Presley of Southern California. Therefore, the surety bonds posted for these drains may now be exonerated. DISCUSSION The following listed surety bonds need to be exonerated: Tract No.: 41305, Storm Drain No. 1668 Unit II Bond Number: OC300849 Principal: Presley of Southern California Surety: Fremont Indemnity Co. Amount: $6,700 (Original Bond Amount $27,000) Page 2 June 2, 1992 Bond Exoneration Tract No.: 42533, Bond Number: 5293534 Principal: Presley Surety: Safeco Amount: $8,000 Prepared By: Anne Garvey Storm Drain No. 1890 of Southern California Insurance Company of America (Original Bond Amount $40,000) July 10, 1991 Honorable Board of S County of Los Angele 383 Hall of Administ 500 West Temple Stre Los Angeles, Califor Dear Supervisors A D ,I'l BOARD Ot S ery i" so rs COUNTY OF tion 9 a 90012 LARRY j. EXECUTI, IN REPLY PLEAS TEDFER TO FILE RVISOR� . ri6f1 F' W L 3 0 1991 :TEILH fflrco TRANSFER OF STORM DR- N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LOS ANGELES COUNTY F_JOD CONTROL DISTRICT PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1668 UNIT II, SUPERVISORIAL DISTRIC 4 RECOMMENDATION: That your Board :approve the transfer and conveyance to the Flood Control District from tre City of Diamond Bar of Private Drain No. 1668 Unit II, subject to conditions and provisions contained in the enclosed Resolution of Offer. Section 13-3/4 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control Act authorizes your Board to accept the transfer and conveyance of storm drain facilities to the District for future operation and maintenance when the facilities are offered by resolution of the jurisdictional agency. This facility consists of various -size underground storm drain pipes in City streets and right of way. We have reviewed the plan for the drain, have inspected it, and recommend acceptance of the drain for transfer. The transfer of this drainage system is categorically exempt as specified in Class 1(u) of the Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines adopted by your Board on November 17, 1987, Synopsis 73. C( LINTY OF LOS ANGE) �'S .,.,� '.0 ,' D 'ARTMENT OF PUBLIC WO &S x Lip Mt►" 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 HOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. DirectorTelephone: _ (8 18) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 - 'ALHAMBRA;CALIFORNIA 91802.1460 July 10, 1991 Honorable Board of S County of Los Angele 383 Hall of Administ 500 West Temple Stre Los Angeles, Califor Dear Supervisors A D ,I'l BOARD Ot S ery i" so rs COUNTY OF tion 9 a 90012 LARRY j. EXECUTI, IN REPLY PLEAS TEDFER TO FILE RVISOR� . ri6f1 F' W L 3 0 1991 :TEILH fflrco TRANSFER OF STORM DR- N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LOS ANGELES COUNTY F_JOD CONTROL DISTRICT PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1668 UNIT II, SUPERVISORIAL DISTRIC 4 RECOMMENDATION: That your Board :approve the transfer and conveyance to the Flood Control District from tre City of Diamond Bar of Private Drain No. 1668 Unit II, subject to conditions and provisions contained in the enclosed Resolution of Offer. Section 13-3/4 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control Act authorizes your Board to accept the transfer and conveyance of storm drain facilities to the District for future operation and maintenance when the facilities are offered by resolution of the jurisdictional agency. This facility consists of various -size underground storm drain pipes in City streets and right of way. We have reviewed the plan for the drain, have inspected it, and recommend acceptance of the drain for transfer. The transfer of this drainage system is categorically exempt as specified in Class 1(u) of the Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines adopted by your Board on November 17, 1987, Synopsis 73. Honorable Board of Supervisor Private DrainA o. 1668 Unit II July 10, 1991 Page 2 The format of the enclosed Resolution has been reviewed from a legal standpoint and approved by County Counsel. The District has recorded a Qui.tcla-im Deed executed by the City of Diamond Bar for the- necessary rights of way. With the adoption hereof by your Board, this will complete the transfer, and we will assume --operation and maintenance of the facility. We are enclosing a certified copy of the City's Resolution for your files. One approved copy of this- letter is requested. Respectfully submitted,. - T. A. TIDEMANSON Director of Public Works SD:al PD87 Enc. _ HOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Dinear July 17, 1991 • • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone (8181438-5100 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles 383 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisors: A✓ MCaO ALL{.vKxrbrvry UGN" Iv: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE. L-3 BOARD Or SUPERA'Vl _.-,CL.NTY OF LOS 4i;Gr J.0 L 3 0 :1991 TRANSFER OF STORM DRAIN CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LARRY J.h10NTE1LH LOS ANGELES COUNTY_ FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT EnCUTIVE OFFICER PRIVATE DRAIN 901890; SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT --4 ""-'RECOMMENDATION: That your Board approve the transfer and conveyance to the Flood Control District from the City of Diamond Bar of Private Drain No. 1890, subject to conditions and provisions contained in the enclosed Resolution of Offer. Section 13-1/4 of the Los Angeles County Flood -Control Act authorizes your Board to accept the transfer and conveyance of storm drain facilities to the District for future operation and maintenance when the facilities are offered by resolution of the jurisdictional agency. This facility consists of various -size underground storm drain pipes i.n City streets and right of way. We have reviewed the plan for the drain, have inspected it, and recommend acceptance of the drain for transfer. The transfer of this drainage system is categorically exempt as specified In Class 1(u) of the Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines adopted by your Board on November 17, 1987, Synopsis 73. 0 Honorable Board of Sup -visor Private Drain No. 1890 July 17, 1991 Page -2 The format of the encl-:,ed Resolution has been reviewed from a legal standpoint and approved by County ',ounsel. - Right -of Way for this -.ciltty was dedicated to the District=by-Trazt Map. With the adoption here(r by your Board, this_wiI.I.complete--the transfer, and we, wi.l ] assume operation i. 7d maintenance- of the fa-01-tty. Weare enclosinga cera ified,copy= of- the pity's --Resolution for your fides. One appu'oved copy of this ' etter-1 s requested.: -- Respectfully submitted. - - - �T. A. TIDEMANSON- Director of Public Works . SD:aI P 8 Enc.. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 26, 1992 FROM: David G. Liu, Associate Engineer TITLE: Storm Drain Bond Reduction for Private Drain Number 2021 on Tract 36741 constructed by Presley of Southern California. SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to reduce the surety bond posted for Storm Drain No. 2021, located on Tract No. 36741 (East Colombard Lane). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the reduction of the bond posted for Storm Drain No. 2021 on Tract 36741 in the amount of $25,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the Los Angeles County, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Presley of Southern California of the City Council's action. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Ordinances(s) X Other:L.A. Co. Board of Supervisors' Acceptance Agreement Letter EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No Report discussed with the following affected departments: REVIEWED BY: Terrence L. Belanger avid G. Liu Acting City Manager Associate Engineer CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L.Belanger, Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Reduction of Bond for Storm Drain No. 2021 on Tract No. 36741 (East Colombard Lane). ISSUE STATEMENT This report requests the reduction of faithful performance bond posted for Storm Drain No. 2021 on Tract No. 36741 constructed by Presley of Southern California. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the reduction of the bond posted for Storm Drain No. 2021 on Tract 36741 in the amount of $25,000. Further, it is recommended that the City Clerk notify the Los Angeles County, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Presley of the City Council's action. FINANCIAL SUMMARY This action has no impact on the City's 1991-1992 budget. BACKGROUND The construction of this storm drain on East Colombard Lane has been completed. It has been transferred to Los Angeles County for maintenance and the fees involved in the transferrance procedure have now been fully paid by the Principal, Presley of Southern California. Therefore, the portion of the surety bond posted for this drain may now be reduced. DISCUSSION The following listed surety bond needs to be reduced by: Tract No.: 36741, Storm Drain No. 2021 Bond Number: 5293514 Principal: Presley of Southern California Surety: Safeco Insurance Company of America Amount: $25,000 (Original Storm Drain Bond Amount $102,000) Prepared By: Anne Garvey HOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Director CRUNTY OF LOS ANGELS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818)458-3100 February 18, 1992 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles 383 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Supervisors: TRANSFER OF STORM DRAIN CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2021, RECOMMENDATION: ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA• CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE R.EE ER ADOPDTE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 2 6 MAR 0 3 1992 CONTROL DISTRICT SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 4 LARRY J. MONTEILH EXECUTIVE O"M That your Board approve the transfer and conveyance to the Flood Control District from the City of Diamond Bar of Private Drain No. 2021, subject to conditions and provisions contained in the enclosed Resolution of Offer. Section 13-3/4 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control Act authorizes your Board to accept the transfer and conveyance of storm drain facilities to the District for future operation and maintenance when the facilities are offered by resolution of the jurisdictional agency. This facility consists of various size underground storm drain pipes in City streets and rights of way. we have reviewed the plan for the drain, have inspected it, and recommend acceptance of the drain for transfer. The transfer of this drainage system is categorically exempt as specified in Class 1(u) of the Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines adopted by your Board on November 17, 1987, Synopsis 57. The format of the enclosed Resolution has been reviewed from a legal standpoint and approved by County Counsel. Honorable Board of Supervisors Private Drain No. 2021 February 18, 1992 Page 2 Right of way for this drain was dedicated by Tract Map. With the adoption hereof by your Board, this will complete the transfer, and we will assume operation and maintenance of the facility. We are enclosing a certified copy of the City's Resolution for your files. One approved copy of this letter is requested. Respectfully submitted, L A�T. A. TIDEMAN ON Director of Public Works SD: al PD2021 Enc. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. S. 12 TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 27, 1992 FROM: David G. Liu, Associate Engineer TITLE: Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project SUMMARY: The Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project consists of the proposed widening of Pathfinder Road Overcrossing on State Route 57, modification of the southerly ramp terminals and traffic signals, and construction of a park and ride lot on the northeast quadrant of the interchange.The County of Los Angeles has agreed to be the lead agency in design and construction of said project. In order that the County may administer a cooperative project, County jurisdiction is requested from 1,300 feet west of Brea Canyon Road/Fern Hollow Drive to Brea Canyon Road/Fern Hollow Drive. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consent to the establishment of a portion of Pathfinder Road within the City as part of the system of Highways of the County of Los Angeles. Furthermore, it is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the Negative Declaration for the Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project and park-and-ride lot and determine that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) _ Ordinances(s) X Other: Negative Declaration _ Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Community Development (Planning) 3VIEWED BY: errence L. Belanger David Liu Acting City Manager Associate Engineer CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA NO. MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project ISSUE STATEMENT In order for the County to administer a cooperative project to widen the overcrossing and roadway approaches on Pathfinder Road over the Orange Freeway (State Route 57), County jurisdiction of a portion of Pathfinder Road within the City is needed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consent to the establish- ment of a portion of Pathfinder Road within the City as part of the system of Highways of the County of Los Angeles. Furthermore, it is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the Negative Declaration for the Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project and park-and-ride lot and determine that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment. FINANCIAL SUMMARY There will be no impact on the City's General Funds. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Pathfinder Bridge Widening Project consists of widening of the Pathfinder Road Overcrossing on State Route 57, modification of the southerly ramp terminals and traffic signals, and construction of a park-and-ride lot on the northeast quadrant of the interchange. The project will be funded jointly by Caltrans, the County of Los Angeles, and the City of Diamond Bar. Additionally, the County of Los Angeles has accepted to be the lead agency in design and construction of said project. On April 21, 1992, at the City Council's regular meeting, the Council authorized the Mayor to enter into a tri -party cooperative agreement. As of this date, staff has been informed that the County Board of Supervisors approved the cooperative agreement on May 26, 1992 and that necessary encroachment permit was issued by Caltrans to L.A. County Department of Public Works on May 5, 1992. The project has been tentatively scheduled to be advertised for construction bids in June of 1992, pending the City's consent to jurisdiction, full execution of the cooperative agreement and the necessary Federal approvals. Upon completion of the project, the jurisdiction will be relinquished by the County of Los Angeles. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State Guidelines for Implementa- tion of the California Environmental Quality Act, the County has conducted an initial study concerning possible effects of this project on the environment and has prepared the attached Negative Declaration (ND) for our review. Copies of the ND were transmitted by the County to all responsible agencies and the Diamond Bar Public Library for public review. Staff has reviewed the Negative Declaration and concur with the finding of no significant effect on the environment. Therefore, approval of the ND is requested at this time. Prepared By: David G. Liu COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PATHFINDER ROAD BRIDGE WIDENING AT THE 57 FREEWAY AND PARK-AND-RIDE LOT I. Location and Brief Description of Project The location of the proposed project is Pathfinder Road at the 57 Freeway in the City of Diamond Bar. The project proposes widening the south side of the Pathfinder Road bridge across the 57 Freeway and the approach to the bridge by approximately 42 feet to match the existing portions of Pathfinder Road. The project includes relocation of the existing northbound off -ramp and southbound on-ramp to meet the widened road. The project also consists of constructing curb and gutter on the southeast side of the bridge and a park-and-ride facility on approximately 3 acres of land to accommodate 120 cars at the northeast corner of Pathfinder Road at the 57 Freeway. Mitigation Measures Included in the Pro ect to Avoid Potential) i nifican Effects none so state No mitigation measures are required. III. Finding of No Significant Effect Based -on the attached Initial Study, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. AA:dsa P-6:11133 Attach. INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS Project Title: Pathfinder Road at 57 Freeway This Initial Study was prepared by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Division 13, California Public Resources Code) and the `State EIR Guidelines' (Division 6, California Administrative Code). I. Location and Description of Project A. Location: See attached map City or community: Diamond Bar B. Specific street or watercourse: Pathfinder Road and 57 Freeway Description of Work: The project proposes widening the southside of the Pathfinder Road bridge across the 57 Freeway and the approach of the bridge by approximately 42 feet to match the existing portion of Pathfinder Road. The project includes relocation of the existing bridge northbound off -ramp and southbound on-ramp to meet the widened road. The project also consists of construction of curb and gutter on the southeast side of the bridge and a on approximately 3 acres of land to accommodatea120rcarside fatithe on northeast corner of the bridge. C. Purpose: To improve traffic circulation within the Pathfinder Road bridge and to facilitate the use of carpools and express bus service by residents of the City of Diamond Bar and surrounding areas. D. Phasing and Relationship to Other Projects: None II. Compatibility With General Planfs): The proposed bridge widening is one of the City of Diamond Bar's Community General Plan Policies as described int he Circulation Element as Policy No. 5, which states 'Widen Pathfinder Road between its easterly and westerly intersections with Brea Canyon Road to include two additional lanes on the 57 Freeway overpass•. The park-and-ride lot 1s located within the area that is part of the Freeway System, which is not not in the General Plan with any specific Land Use. However, the park-and- ride facility is a common use in these types of areas. M. Environmental Setting Project Site: The project site consists of a four -lane highway aligned in an east to west direction which narrows to a two-lane bridge over the 57 Freeway. At the northeast corner of the bridge is an undeveloped 3 -acre, fenced, vacant lot covered with a small amount of weeds. -2 - Surrounding Properties: The surrounding land uses include single-family residential to the to the northeast of the project site, commercial development to both the northwest and southeast of the project site. and undeveloped area to the southwest of the project site. Identification of Environmental Effects (All •yes•, 'maybe' and '*• answers are explained on Attachment A) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? X* c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X* d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X* f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet, or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ X* 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emeissions or deterioration of ambient air quality over the long term? _ X b. The creation of objectionable odors or dust? X* _ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X* ____ -3 - YES MAYBE NO 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X* c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e.g., perennial or intermittent streams; seasonal or year-round springs; ponds and marshes) — X e. Alteration of water quality including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity? _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters, including changes in infiltration or percolation rates? _ X* g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of any aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X* — b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? _ — X* c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ X e. Any effect upon a Significant Ecological Area which is identified in the Los Angeles County General Plan? _ X •4 - YES MAYBE NO 5. Animal life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X* b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise or vibration levels? ._._ _ X* b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ._ _ X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or Glare? X* B. Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located? _ X 9. Natural Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? — X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? — X c. Exposure of people or property to a flooding hazard, such as a change in location of flooding -5 - YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Mill the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X* b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X* c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ X d. Alterations to present patterns or circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X* _ e. Alterations to waterborne, ra11, or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? _ _ X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services? _ _ X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. A substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? _ X ib. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to utilities such as, but not limited to, gas, water, sewer, storm water drainage, or solid waste disposal? X* 17. Hunan Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ _ X -6 - YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view from existing residential areas, public lands, or roads? _ X b. Creation of an aesthetically offensive site? _ _ X c. Change in character of the general project area? _ _ X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural, Archaeological, Historical, and Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result 'in: a. Alteration or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ X* b. Alteration or destruction of a paleontological resource? X* c. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? d. Physical changes which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ X e. Restriction of existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X -7 - YES MAYBE NO c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X SUMMARY: Factor No Sig. Effect Possible Possible Sig. Effect** Explanation Earth X See Attachment A Air X See Attachment A Nater ee ttachment Plant Life X See Attachment Animal Life X See Attachment Noise X See Attachment A Light and Glare X See Attachment Land Use X No ect Naturalesources o TT Risk of Upset X No f ect o u ation X No Effect Housing No ect -T—ransportationi Circulation X See Attachment A Public Services X No Effect Eneru No Effect Utilities No Effect Hunan Health No Effect Aesthetics X No Effect Recreation X No Ef ect Cultural es. et &I X No Effect Mandatory Findings of Significance X No Effect **See County Guidelines, Appendix D, for examples of significant effects. -8- V. Discussion of Ways to Mitigate Significant Effects No significant effects are identified. VI. Initial Study Preparation. A. Conclusion of Initial Study On the basis of this Initial Study: X The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. _ The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Report is required. The potential significant effects have been identified above. B. Preparation This study was prepared by Albert Anidi of the Planning Division, Los Angeles County Department of Publis orks, under the supervision of Michael H. Nagao Date 09/10/90 AA:dsa _ P-6:IS/3/PR.i-.8 ATTACHMENT A DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS PATHFINDER ROAD AT 57 FREEWAY 1. Earth Minor modifications to the landform will be required to park-and-ride facility. Grading for the project will be 3,100 cubic yards. Any excess material will be properly contractor. The effect of the proposed project on earth significant. 2. Al r construct the approximately disposed of by the is not considered During construction, dust and exhaust fumes from construction equipment may temporarily affect the air quality in the surrounding area. Exhaust odors and fugitive dust may be occasionally noticeable on properties adjacent to the site. However, the use'of proper wetting procedures will help to minimize dust generation. Any potential impacts from construction activities are anticipated to be minor and short-term. The proposed park-and-ride facility will induce traffic. However, the majority of the traffic generated by the proposed facility will represent a redistribution of trips already occurring in the area rather than newly created trips. Thus, the effect on local air quality is not considered substantial. The commuter car pooling and bus usage, which such park-and- ride facility is designed to encourage, would have a beneficial effect upon regional air quality. The bridge widening will allow for smoother traffic flow thus less stops and starts for vehicles which is considered a beneficial effect. The effect of the project on air is, therefore, not considered significant. 3. Water The proposed park-and-ride facility will introduce approximately 4,600 square feet*of impervious surface to the project site thereby increasing the rate and amount of storm water runoff. This will also reduce the rate of water absorption into the ground. Construction of the curb and gutter would help collect and transport on-site runoff. As the site is not part of a recognized aquifer recharge area and is mostly developed, the restriction of water absorption into the ground is, therefore, not considered significant. -1- 4. Plant Life Construction of the proposed project will require the removal of vegetation (mostly weeds) at the proposed park-and-ride lot. Also, the vegetation on the slope along the freeway on-ramp will be disturbed and removed during site clearing/grading activities. Hone of the plant species found on-site are considered rare, unique, or endangered. The vegetation removed along the ramp slope during ramp relocation will revegetate itself with native plants after the project. Therefore, the effect of project on plant life Is not considered significant. 5. Animal Life The proposed project area is mostly devoid of animal life due to the development and limited plant life. No unique, rare or endangered species of animals are known to inhabit the site. Any wildlife displaced as a result of the proposed project would migrate to the surrounding areas. The effect of the proposed project on wildlife is not considered significant. 6. Noise An increase in existing noise and vibration levels will occur during construction of the proposed project. The area is already experiencing freeway noise and since the noise generated from construction of the project will be temporary, the effect is, therefore, not considered significant. 7. Light and Glare Due to the construction of the park-and-ride lot, security parking lot lighting for the proposed project will introduce a new source of light. Since the project location is very close to a lighted freeway, no adverse off-site light and glare impacts are anticipated. It is also anticipated that the on-site lighting shall be arranged to prevent glare or direct illumination impacts on the residential properties at the northeast corner of the project site by the use of cut-off lighting fixtures. 13. Transportation/Circulation The proposed project will widen the south side of the bridge thereby improving the traffic circulation. Construction of the proposed project will not result in any additional vehicle trip generation. However the construction of the park-and-ride facility would result in changes to current patterns of vehicular movement. The facility can be expected to stimulate ridesharing and encourage a more efficient use of existing transportation facilities. Relocating the freeway on and off ramps would improve the Level of Service (LOS) at the northbound ramps from the existing LOS of C to A 1n the morning peak and E to C in the afternoon peak. Also the southbound ramps will improve from the existing LOS F to C in the afternoon peak while the existing morning peak will remain unchanged at LOS C. LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow, ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to overload conditions at LOS F. The project will generally improve the traffic condition within the area and, therefore, is not considered significant. - 2 - 20. Cultural /Archaeological lPaleontological The surrounding project area is developed and there are no known cultural resources existing at the project site. Project specifications require that if cultural resources are found, the contractor will immedialtely cease excavation and a qualified archaeologist would be notified. The impacts on archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are not considered significant. AA:dsa P-6:1/130 - 3 - ti�i,�✓F�i1�ifR ,(�iep .sT 5%F.pEE�t/f1y a 'ARx allo puac LOT mmmuw l -/ECT STE At jp,.4 E T¢. 3V - V, Ms. Terri Loveiady To State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, Ca. .9581+ Gary McSweeney - District 7 From : OPART~ OF TRANS►ORTATIOM Ubiw- Project Review Comments Ow :October 30, 1990 Fik No.: IOR/Clo Dept. of Public Works-L.A. Co. MD t Pathfinder Road 1 57 Frowsy vic.LA-57-83.17 Caltrans has reviewed the above -referenced document. Based on the information recieved we have the following comwents: 1. - This project is being coordinated by our Project Davelopmant Unit -Branch "D". A project report is presently being reviewed by this District office. Caltrans will also be providing oversight for the prelisinary engineering design and construction phases as spelled out in the Cooperative Agreement. Any questions concerning this project nay be directed to Frank Quon at (213'620-2283. 2. - It is Caltrans understanding that the "installation of weight and notion detectors at each rasp" is no longer a part of this project. if you have any questions regarding this response, please call Wilford Melton at (213)620-6160. �c Cary x Sweeney WM ICR/CEQA Coordinator Transportation Planning and Analysis Branch cc: Mr. Albert Anidi County of Los Angeles Department of Public corks STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE OEUK_ MEJIA_ N,G W"Orr CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - LOS ANGELES REGION 101 Centre Plaza Drive Monterey Park, California 91754-2156 (213) 266-7500 October 16, 1990 Albert Anidi County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works 900 South Fremont Ave. Alhambra, CA 91803 File: 700.410 NEGATIVE DECLARATION - WIDEN PATHFINDER ROAD BRIDGE ACROSS 57 FREEWAY AND PARR -AND -RIDE LOT, DIAMOND BAR AREA. 8CH#90010944: L. A. COUNTY DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS We have reviewed the subject document regarding the proposed project, and have the following comments: Based on the information provided, we recommend the following: Fm We have no further comments at this time. The proposed project should address the attached comments. Thank you for this opportunity to review your document. If you have a questions, please contact Eugene C. Ramstedt at (213) 266-7553. JOHN L. LEWIS, Unit Chief Technical Support Unit cc: Terri Lovelady, State Clearinghouse (07-13-89) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. TO: Honorable Mayor, City Council and Acting City Manager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 26, 1992 FROM: Joann M. Gitmed, Senior Accountant TITLE: Resolution 92 -XX entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar appointing a City Treasurer. SUMMARY: The California Government Code requires the City to appoint a City Treasurer. Due to the recent change in the management of the City, a resolution appointing a new City Treasurer needs to be approved. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution 92 -XX entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Appointing a City Treasurer." LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report XXX Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) — Agreement(s) EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) Other I . Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affects by the report? — Yes No Report discussed with the following affected departments: VIEWED Y: 64� Terrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager Linda G. Mag"(4n Senior Accountant RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPOINTING A CITY TREASURER A. Recitals (i) The California Government Code requires the City to appoint a City Treasurer. (ii) The City Council desires to appoint Terrence L. Belanger as the City Treasurer to ensure the efficient operation of the City Government. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar follows: 1. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Fart A, of this Resolution. 2. Terrence L. Belanger hereby is appointed City Treasurer of the City of Diamond Bar. 3. The City Treasurer may appoint such deputies as are deemed necessary and convenient for the efficient operation of the City, subject to the approval, by minute action, of the City Council. 4. The City Treasurer may delegate such duties and responsibilities as are deemed appropriate to any deputy appointed thereby, subject to approval, by minute action, of the City Council. Resolution 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1992. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond bar held on the day of 1992, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.1 NO DOCUNENTATION AVAILABLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. —7,1 TO: Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT DATE: May 29, 1992 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager TITLE: Interim Ordinance regarding signs. SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar adopted a sign ordinance on August 20, 1991. The sign ordinance prohibited or limited the use of certain types of signs within the city of Diamond Bar, among those were prohibited or limited were banner signs and inflatable signs. In an effort to provide a less restrictive policy regarding banner and inflatable signs is an interim ordinance which would allow the use of such signs by permit in certain locations within Diamond Bar, as proposed. The interim ordinance would be in effect for 45 days, at which time the City Council would make a decision regarding extending the interim ordinance for an additional 10 -month and 15 -day period. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt an interim ordinance which would allow the use of banner and inflatable signs by permit. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification _ Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) g Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) Other EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes —No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Yes X No Which Commission? _ 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X_ Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: Community Development Terrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. I TO: Mayor and City Council MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Manager TITLE: Proposed Budget and CIP for FY1992-93. REPORT DATE: May 29, 1992 SUMMARY: The City Manager has given to the City Council the proposed City of Diamond Bar Municipal Budget and CIP for FY1992-93. Pursuant under State law, a city must adopt a municipal budget on or before June 30 of any given year. Further, under State law a city planning commission must find that the proposed public works projects indentified in the proposed CIP are consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered by the city. On May 29, 1992, the Planning Commission did, in fact, find the FY1992-93 CIP consistent. The City Council has set a public hearing for June 2 to receive public comments regarding the proposed budget. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed City of Diamond Bar Municipal Budget and CIP for FY1992-93, as presented. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report Resolution(s) _ Ordinances(s) _ Agreement(s) X Other - Budget EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: _ Public Hearing Notification Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes x No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A _ Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A Yes _ No Which Commission? _ 5. Are other departments affected by the report? x Yes —No Report discussed with the following affected departments: All City Departments Terrence L. Belanger Acting City Manager 1 Copies of the Budget are available upon request RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 92-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401 AND 65402 PERTAINING TO THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65401 and 65402 requires this Commission to review proposed public works projects for the ensuing fiscal year to determine compliance thereof with the City's General Plan. (ii) The City Manager and City Engineer of the City of Diamond Bar have heretofore prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Program for the City's 1992-93 fiscal year which briefly describes certain public works of improvement proposed to occur during the 1992-93 Fiscal Year. Said Projects include, but are not limited to, street and highway improvements, traffic median improvements, and property acquisition. (iii) This Commission has conducted a duly noticed public meeting on the City of Diamond Bar Fiscal Year 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program, and the projects contained therein, and concluded said discussions prior to the adoption of this Resolu- tion. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. The City of Diamond Bar was incorporated on April 18, 1989 and is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of a general plan. 3. Based upon the facts and evidence presented during the public hearing conducted by this Commission regarding the City's Fiscal Year 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program, including oral and documentary evidence provided by City staff, this Commission, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65360, hereby finds as follows: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the public works projects identified in the City's proposed Fiscal Year 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered and studied by the City; (b) There is little or no probability that the public works projects identified in the City's Fiscal Year 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program will be of substantial detriment to, or interfere with, the proposed general plan; and (c) The proposed public works projects comply with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinanc- es, regulations and standards. 4. This Resolution shall serve as the Planning Commission's report to the City Council regarding the conformity of the public works projects proposed in the City's Fiscal Year 1992-93 Program as required by California Government Code Section 65402 and 65402. 5. The Secretary to the Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy hereof to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar for use in its deliberations regarding said Budget. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 28th day of May, 1992. Chairman I, James DeStefano , Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 28th_ day of May, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Meyer, MacBride, Li, Flammenbaum COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Grothe ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Sec Nary to t e Planning Commission of he City of Diamond Bar i U- DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. `T TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Acting City Dlanager MEETING DATE: June 2, 1992 FROM: Troy L. Butzlaff, Assistant to the City Manager REPORT DATE: May 30, 1992 TITLE: Final Adoption of the Source Rec'.uction and Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste Elements. SUMMARY: The City's Source Reduction ,and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) were developed in response to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and subsequent legislation. The Act, also known as AB 939, requires the City to prepare, adopt, and implement a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) which identifies how the City will divert, through a combination of source reduction, recycling, and composting programs, 25 % of solid wastes from landfill disposal by 1995, and 50% by the year 2000. In addition, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 2707, which requires the City to prepare, adopt, and implement a separate Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) which identifies how the City will properly reduce, collect, recycle, treat and dispose of all household hazardous wastes generated within its incorporated boundaries. Pursuant to this legislation, the City must hold at least one public hearing to receive public testimony on the programs and policies addressed within these elements prior to their final adoption. Unfortunately, due to a unanticipated delay in receiving the California Integrated Waste Management Board's written comments on the Household Hazardous Waste Element, the City must now continue this public hearing to their next regularly scheduled meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council continue the public hearing to their June 16, 1992, regularly scheduled meeting to facilitate the additional time needed to integrate the Waste Board's. comments into the final elements. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS _ Staff Report Public Hearing Notification r Resolution(s) ^_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office) r Ordinances(s) _ Other: EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Adjoining cities, County of Los Angeles, California Integrated Waste Management Board, interested members of the public. SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: 1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No by the City Attorney? 2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote? NO 3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No 4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No Which Commission? 5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No Report discussed with the following affected departments: All City departments are impacted by this document R4VIEWED B : *tgo �+-- errence L. Belanger r . Butzlaff Acting City Manager Ass' t to the Mang r