HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/03/1992CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Mayor — Jay C. (im
Mayor Pro Tem — Phyllis E. Papen
Councilman — John A. Forbing
Councilman — Gary H. Werner
Councilman — Gary G. Miller
City Council Chambers
are located at:
South Coast Air Qualityhfanagement District Auditorium
21885 East Copley Drive
Please retain from wnWng, eatingor in in d am ` rs
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Andrew V. Arczynski
City Attorney
MEETING TIME: CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M. Lynda Burgess
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 P.M. City Clerk
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation < relating to 09.00 items referred o t a this agenda
are ort file in the Office of the City Clerk and sre available fou uw. r�spsction. ti You,have questions
regarding an agenda item,'plean contact the Eily Clerk at Ct.4)1i8E1� + 8g during b inessours.
The City of Diamond Bar uses RECYCLED paper and encourages you to aro the same.
THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON
CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR
PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL MEETING TAPES WILL BE
BLACKED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR
REPRODUCTION.
5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
Litigation - Section 54956.9
Next Resolution No. 92-06
Next Ordinance No. 2 (1992)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Papen
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN FORBING, MILLER, WERNER,
MAYOR PRO TEM PAPEN, MAYOR KIM
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council
discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for
action at a future meeting.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular
meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address
the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not
already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Sneaker's Card and
give it to the Ci_y Clerk completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute
maximum time limit when addressingthe he City Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
5.1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - March 9, 1992 - 7:00 P.M. AQMD, 21865
E. Copley Dr.
5.1.2 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION - March 10, 1992 - 6:00 p.m.,
AQMD Room CC -8, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - March 12, 1992 - 7:00 p.m.,
City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100
5.1.4 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - March 12, 1992 -
6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 17, 1992 - 6:00 P.M., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 MARCH 3, 1992
5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES -
5.2.1 Regular Meeting of February 4, 1992
5.2.2 Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992
5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated March 3, 1992 in the
amount of $515,808.58.
5.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
January, 1992.
5.5 RECEIVE & FILE TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES Regular Meeting of January 9, 1992.
5.6 RECEIVE & FILE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES -
5.6.1 Regular Meeting of January 9, 1992
5.6.2 Regular Meeting of January 23, 1992
5.7 RECEIVE & FILE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of
January 27, 1992.
5.8 GRADING BOND EXONERATIONS -
5.8.1 BOND NO. 5558083, TRACT 39679 - The City desires to exonerate a
$7,770 grading surety bond posted by Safeco Insurance Company of
America for Tract No. 39679, located at 1300-1360 Valley Vista Dr. On
October 26, 1990, the grading for office buildings Nos. 1-7 was finalized
by the Dept. of Public Works.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading of 1300-1360 Valley
Vista Dr. and exonerate the surety bond posted in the amount of $7,770.
5.8.2 BOND NO. 114-61966-1, TRACT NO. 30578 - The City desires to
exonerate a $1,260 surety bond posted for grading at 2569 Wagon Train, a
single family residence.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading construction and
exonerate the grading surety bond.
5.8.3 BOND NO. 33270, TRACT NO. 30289 -The City desires to exonerate
Surety Bond No. 33270 in the amount of $20,000 for grading at 2715
Shadow Canyon Dr., a single family residence.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading construction at 2715
Shadow Canyon Dr in the amount of $20,000.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 MARCH 3, 1992
5.9 DESIGN OF DOUBLE LEFT -TURN LANES ON GRAND AVE. AT GOLDEN
SPRINGS - During the February 13, 1992 Traffic & Transportation Commission
meeting, alternatives to modify and improve the intersection of Grand Ave. and
Golden Springs Dr. were discussed. A large volume of traffic travels through this
intersection daily due to the continuation of Grand Ave. into Chino Hills and
Industry as well as usage of the AQMD facilities. With addition of second left -
turn lanes to the north and southbound approaches on Grand Ave., the level of
service at said intersection will be improved.
Recommended Action: The Traffic & Transportation Commission recommends
that staff be authorized to develop plans for second left -turn lanes on north and
southbound approach lanes of Grand Ave. at Golden Springs Dr.
5.10 RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DR.
FROM BREA CANYON RD. TO GRAND AVE. - Golden Springs Dr., between
Brea Canyon Rd. and Grand Ave. is in need of pavement rehabilitation and/or
reconstruction. In order to determine the most practical and economic approach
for improvements, the existing pavement on Golden Springs Dr. must be analyzed
and evaluated. Based on the pavement evaluation, plans and specifications for the
project will be designed accordingly. Staff has received and evaluated seven (7)
proposals for design and construction administrative services of subject project.
Recommended Action: Award a contract for design and inspection services to
Dwight French & Associates in an amount not to exceed $52,830.00.
5.11 1991-92 SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - AREA TWO - The
City is divided into seven areas for road maintenance to enable the City to proceed
with an orderly slurry seal program. Plans and specifications for Area Two have
been prepared. The engineer's estimate for this project is $166,000 from which
Gas Tax Funds can be utilized.
Recommended Action: Approve plans and specifications for the 1991-92 Slurry
Seal Project and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the project for bids.
5.12 PROP A LOCAL RETURN FUND & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT
ACT AUDITS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED NNE 30, 1991 AND 1990
The City's Proposition A Local Return (Prop A) and Transportation Development
Act Funds (TDA) are required to be audited on an annual basis. The audit for
fiscal year ended June 30, 1991 was completed in October, 1991 by Quezada
Godsey & Co., C.P.A. and Simpson & Simpson, C.P.A. Final audits were received
by the City this month and are being presented to Council for their review.
Recommended Action: Receive, accept and file Prop A Local Return Fund and
Transportation Development Act Fund Audit Reports for fiscal years ending June
30, 1991 and 1990.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 MARCH 3, 1992
5.13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22102 - Bryan Stirrat & Associates requested
approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 22102) for a minor subdivision to
create two (2) lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel, located at 1575 S. Valley Vista
Dr. in the Gateway Corporate Center. In response to council action on January
21, 1992, a resolution of denial has been prepared.
Recommended Action: Pursuant to request from the applicant, it is recommended
that this matter be postponed to April 7, 1992.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES ETC.
6.1 PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming March, 1992 as Women's History Month.
6.2 PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming March, 1992 as "L.A. Means Business" Month.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-06: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF LANDS INTO LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 38, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992-
93 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF
REPORT THEREON - The City annually provides maintenance of landscaped
open space improvements and intends to continue by special assessments within
the City's Landscaping Assessment District No. 38. District No. 38 is citywide and
was established to benefit all property owners. Each parcel equally receives
general benefits from the increase in the community standards and associated
property value. Therefore, it is recommended that the City annex a portion of land
not included in the original District No. 38. Proceedings for maintenance of said
improvements are pursuant to provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of
1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92- to initiate proceedings for
annexation of lands into LAD NO. 3 8 and authorize staff to prepare the Engineer's
Report.
7.2 APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS DUE TO EXPIRATION OF TERMS
7.2.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - Appoint and swear -in all Planning
Commissioners.
7.2.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Appoint and swear -
in all Traffic & Transportation Commissioners.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 MARCH 3, 1992
7.3.3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Appoint and swear -in all
Parks & Recreation Commissioners.
PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters can be heard.
8.1 TENTATIVE TRACTS 47850, 47851 AND 48487 - The Council held public
hearings on this project at their January 21 and 28 meetings. Council directed staff
to investigate a variety of environmental, geotechnical, and design related issues.
Staff was directed to prepare and return with responses to those comments.
Because of the volume, technical nature of the information and background data to
be gathered, and a delay in preparation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program
(MMP), more time is needed to compile and process the information and respond
to comments.
Recommended Action: Open public hearing, receive additional testimony and
continue the public hearing to April 7, 1992.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
10. ADJOURNMENT: To March 10, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. for Study Session.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITYERK
FROM:DATE: - v
ADDRESS:^ g2lk / X71- ' I PHONE: D jl` ZL i
�' asL C0
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
ignature
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO._t 9ti -4 r rd
AIR
City Clerk
t a SL,c
f'r'LLri
SUBJECT: �'L��L IC C'c r� /'� f• 1 > �� r�r+r �s r L A-, E Z 3 f'A
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
,�ZZ' Z,,,1,.,,-&
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure Correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: _ ►� Gum -6-a� - DATE: Sys/q--,7-
ADDRESS:
ys/gtzADDRESS: 3� I� ^'� PHONE:—,P6/
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: _ -C- UNW4'4s
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
77
FROM: Cy N L I DATE:
ADDRESS: c3 �/U 14 E J)4 PHONE:
ORGANIZATION: _..._
#/SUBJECT: ,
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY CLERK f
DATE:! Q Z
PHONE:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: E)'
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
D�
Signature
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY CLERK n
DATE:
PHONE:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: 2 L
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: 4kWere, /? DATE:
ADDRESS: G � W r ° PHONE: -5.3
ORGANIZATION: Va` e -y u gb10"7 LYDC/ C'2 �_
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:g/'
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST? 4Aglhf
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Signature
D
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA #/SUBJECT:
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST?
CITY CLERK
P A X M A K L, --rt ` DATE: 21,31 9 2
?.Z I i V,r'P-7 T(rlG - M PHONE: 71L4 P -G t'it 21
Ac 9 X—n -f— 4t p �9
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
_-
Signature
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: �/�l �C, �I �i '1 DATE:
ADDRESS: / V�7�7`� �i4- t"� �GOR6, PHONE:%�-
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: —� -AOl
IN FAVOR OF/GAINS T�
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
Sig6'tu��Li��
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK }
FROM: k) Cl DATE: 3 2
ADDRESS: a�^ � PHONE:
ORGANIZATION: II f
AGENDA #/SUBJECT: ��' ,i//`C-)2 Sy
IN FAVOR OF/AGAINST? _1�--p �n�Y
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my
name and address as written above.
1
n A.,yr, , a-1ACA
THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY JONES INTERCABLE
FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM,
YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED.
1. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION:
Litigation - Section 54956.9
Next Resolution No. 92-06
Next Ordinance No. 2 (1992)
6:0-5
2. CALL TO ORDER: 64-60 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: rn nu�
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN FORBING, MILLER,
WERNER, MAYOR PRO TEM PAPEN,
MAYOR KIM
3y--3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual
lane tkowc, Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be
on Le,r;%an, Awe-- given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action
*k&Y\Led q; -, at,a future meeting.
tzar►+ 9.%. sponse .
PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
.4z _ reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
_ opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
fry! !st - Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
re relodfos �. the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to
la._ the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary) . There
is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City
U1��(karn &c&s Council.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
�F5.1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - March 9, 1992 - 7:00
PP
P.M. AQMD, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
K6X _F 5.1.2 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION - March 10, 1992 -
rrt�OO 6:00 p.m., AQMD Room CC -8, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
GIM Cr'�`3i rw) 5.1.3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - March 12, 1992
J - 7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100
5.1.4 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - March
12, 1992 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865
E. Copley Dr.
5.1.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 17, 1992 - 6:00
P.M., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES -
5.2.1 Regular Meeting of February 4, 1992
5.2.2 Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992
MARCH 3, 1992 PAGE 2
5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated March 3,
1992 in the amount of $515,808.58.
5.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - Receive and file Treasurer's Report for
the month of January, 1992.
5.5 RECEIVE & FILE TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES -
Regular Meeting of January 9, 1992.
5.6 RECEIVE & FILE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES -
5.6.1 Regular Meeting of January 9, 1992
5.6.2 Regular Meeting of January 23, 1992
5.7 RECEIVE & FILE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting
of January 27, 1992.
5.8 GRADING BOND EXONERATIONS
5.8.1 BOND NO. 5558083, TRACT 39679 - The City desires to
exonerate a $7,770 grading surety bond posted by
Safeco Insurance Company of America for Tract No.
39679, located at 1300-1360 Valley Vista Dr. On
October 26, 1990, the grading for office buildings
Nos. 1-7 was finalized by the Dept. of Public
Works.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading of
1300-1360 Valley Vista Dr. and exonerate the surety
bond posted in the amount of $7,770.
5.8.2 BOND NO. 114-61966-1, TRACT NO. 30578 - The City
desires to exonerate a $1,260 surety bond posted
for grading at 2569 Wagon Train, a single family
residence.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading
construction and exonerate the grading surety bond.
5.8.3 BOND NO. 33270, TRACT NO. 30289 - The City desires
to exonerate Surety Bond No. 33270 in the amount of
$20,000 for grading at 2715 Shadow Canyon Dr., a
single family residence.
Recommended Action: Approve and accept grading
construction at 2715 Shadow Canyon Dr in the amount
of $20,000.
5.9 DESIGN OF DOUBLE LEFT -TURN LANES ON GRAND AVE. AT GOLDEN
SPRINGS - During the February 13, 1992 Traffic &
Transportation Commission meeting, alternatives to modify
and improve the intersection of Grand Ave. and Golden
Springs Dr. were discussed. A large volume of traffic
travels through this intersection daily due to the
continuation of Grand Ave. into Chino Hills and Industry
as well as usage of the AQMD facilities. With addition
of second left -turn lanes to the north and southbound
MARCH 3, 1992 PAGE 3
approaches on Grand Ave., the level of service at said
intersection will be improved.
Recommended Action: The Traffic & Transportation
Commission recommends that staff be authorized to develop
plans for second left -turn lanes on north and southbound
approach lanes of Grand Ave. at Golden Springs Dr.
5.10 RECONSTRUCTION/ REHABILITATION OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. FROM
BREA CANYON RD. TO GRAND AVE. - Golden Springs Dr.,
between Brea Canyon Rd. and Grand Ave. is in need of
pavement rehabilitation and/or reconstruction. In order
to determine the most practical and ecomonic approach for
improvements, the existing pavement on Golden Springs Dr.
must be analyzed and evaluated. Based on the pavement
evaluation, plans and specifications for the project will
be designed accordingly. Staff has received and
evaluated seven (7) proposals for design and construction
administrative services of subject project.
Recommended Action: Award a contract for design and
inspection services to Dwight French & Associates in an
amount not to exceed $52,830.00.
5.11 1991-92 SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - AREA TWO - The
City is divided into seven areas for road maintenance to
enable the City to proceed with an orderly slurry seal
program. Plans and specifications for Area Two have been
prepared. The engineer's estimate for this project is
$166,000 from which Gas Tax Funds can be utilized.
Recommended Action: Approve plans and specifications for
the 1991-92 Slurry Seal Project and authorize the City
Clerk to advertise the project for bids.
5.12 PROP A LOCAL RETURN FUND & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
AUDITS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1991 AND 1990
- The City's Propostion A Local Return (Prop A) and
Transportation Development Act Funds (TDA) are required
to be audited on an annual basis. The audit for fiscal
year ended June 30, 1991 was completed in October 1991 by
Quezada Godsey & Co., C.P.A. and Simpson & Simpson,
C.P.A. Final audits were received by the City this month
and are being presented to Council for their review.
Recommended Action: Receive, accept and file Prop A
Local Return Fund and Transportation Development Act Fund
Audit Reports for fiscal years ending June 30, 1991 and
1990.
5.13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22102 - Bryan Stirrat &
Associates requested approval of a Tentative Parcel Map
(TPM No. 22102) for a minor subdivision to create two (2)
lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel, located at 1575 S.
Valley Vista Dr. in the Gateway Corporate Center. In
MARCH 3, 1992
PAGE 4
response to Council action on January 21, 1992, a
resolution of denial has been prepared.
Recommended Action: Pursuant to request from the
applicant, it is recommended that this matter be
postponed to April 7, 1992.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES ETC.
�ne. — 6.1 PROCLAMATION - Procla' ng March, 1992 as Women's History
rv-c. �'d 9,-. Month . h�- a-�
6.2 PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming March, 1992 as "L.A. Mems
Business" Month. A a( b ,
7. NEW BUSINESS: Oro"
2VN .- c.5o 7.1
RESOLUTION NO. 921C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
feebmmerate .
-QC.tx19 rc.+ww�.i
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE ANNEXATION OF LANDS INTO 1"DSCAPING ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 38, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED
011 QB�p�; ytcis
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT 'DURING FISCAL YEAR
Ll ��.
1992-93 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING
OF REPORT THEREON - The City annually provides
rve�p p ,,`,,�„�,
maintenance of landscaped open space improvements and
intends to continue by special assessments within the
J�
n
JF,
City's Landscaping Assessment District No. 38. District
No. 38 is citywide and was established to benefit all
property owners. Each parcel equally receives general
benefits from the increase in the community standards and
associated property value. Therefore, it is recommended
that the City annex a portion of land not included in the
original District No. 38. Proceedings for maintenance of
said improvements are pursuant to provisions of the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part -2, Division 15
of the Streets and Highways Code.
06
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -WR to
initiate proceedings for annexation of lands into LAD No.
38 and authorize staff to prepare the Engineer's Report.
JFCj-
.2 APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS DUE TO EXPIRATION OF TERMS -
7.2.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - Appoint and swear -in
all Planning Commissioners.
U• nar► � rnoc�.a --
- &�dfXgh 7.2.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - Appoint
Una n & swear -in all Traffic & Transportation
Comissioners.
�eS 7.2.3
u nckn
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Appoint and
swear -in all Parks & Recreation Commissioners.
PP toKot►'eL�j a654e�onl - N014e_ is
U than L rnu.y
oma_
MARCH 3, 1992 PAGE 5
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters
can be
144,dr� v d o -4-'Q
8.1 TENTATIVE TRACTS 47850, 47851 AND 48487 - The Council
peenp4ok C�6n4'o( held public hearings on this project at their January 21
TJo. )4YC'4 and 28 meetings. Council directed staff to investigate
�0�ah a variety of environmental, geotechnical, and design
_ Ck�rY► related issues. Staff was directed to prepare and return
with responses to those comments. Because of the volume,
icensu�or technical nature of the information and background data
- — to be gathered, and 'a delay in preparation of the
n1�G �AW Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), more time is needed
.-- to compile and process the information and respond to
JbGn comments.
�O Recommended Action: Open public hearing, receive
�I y additional testimony and continue the public hearing to
April 7, 1992.
J. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 6rM-t3 t4 - Pt 6ou1.2
rh
10. ADJOURNMENT: $•�To March 10, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. for Study
Session. 1-61-1
5'; p--()
t7�R-
Unon
C -'M — (&tk( me.otc n a.'
GIX) —PU,-ookk1a.7"
P6DL- &� 0 C �eso far �r n lh Ea'
G -W - Mja.-kZ, ..A-,4-- a-
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
FEBRUARY 4, 1992
1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 p.m. Litigation - G.C. 54956.9
Personnel - G.C. 54957.6
No reportable action taken.
2. CALL TO ORDER: M/Kim called the meeting to order
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers, AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E.
Copley Dr.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge
of Allegiance by M/Kim.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Papen,
Councilmen Forbing, Miller and
Werner.
Also present were Robert L. Van
Nort, City Manager; Andrew V.
Arczynski, City Attorney; James
DeStefano, Director of Community
Development; Sid Mousavi, Director
of Public Works and Lynda Burgess,
City Clerk.
3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: MPT/Papen announced that she and
C/Forbing attended a meeting involving both the Orange
County and the Los Angeles County Transportation
Commissions. All agreed that when HOV lanes are built in
1993-94, sound walls will be erected prior to construction
of the lanes.
C/Werner asked staff to leave the audience seating open and
not tape off any rows of seats.
C/Miller announced that the D.B. High School band and color
guards took first place at the Fiesta Bowl competition in
January and requested staff to coordinate with the school
district for presentation of a plaque honoring their
efforts.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Max Maxwell, 3211 Bent Twig Ln.,
made comments regarding the public hearings of January 21
and 28, 1992.
In response to M/Kim's request, CM/Van Nort stated that the
General Plan was referred back to the GPAC for review in the
hope that that stage will be complete by the end of
February. As for the tree ordinance, as announced at the
last meeting, a study session will be held on this matter on
March 10.
CA/Arczynski stated that the JCC project is being processed
under the codes, ordinances and plans that were in effect
when the application was received. The General Plan has no
FEBRUARY 4, 1992
PAGE 2
relevance to this particular project. In regard to the
issue of the easement, the word is "moot" not "mute" as
quoted by Mr. Maxwell.
M/Papen reiterated that the Public Hearing on the JCC
project was not closed, but continued to March 3, 1992.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Dr., asked that Item 5.6
be pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion. He
further stated that he felt that the January 28 meeting was
not handled properly by MPT/Papen.
Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Dr., suggested that when a
Councilperson is running for election to another office,
he/she should resign his/her Council seat.
Don Schad, 1824 Shaded Wood Rd., stated that prior to
further development, the tree ordinance and General Plan
should be in place.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Forbing moved, MPT/Papen seconded to
approve the Consent Calendar with the exclusion of Items
5.4, 5.5 and 5.6. With the following Roll Call vote, motion
carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Werner, MPT/Papen,
M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
5.1.1
General Plan Advisory Committee - February 8,
1992 - 8:00 - 11:00 a.m., AQMD Room CC -2,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.2
Planning Commission - February 10, 1992 -
7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
Dr.
5.1.3
Traffic & Transportation Commission -
February 13, 1992 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing
Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.4
Parks & Recreation Commission - February 13,
1992 - 7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley
Dr.
5.1.5
General Plan Advisory Committee - February
15, 1992 - 8:00 - 11:00 a.m., AQMD Room CC -2,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.2 WARRANT
REGISTER - Warrant Register dated February 4,
1992 in
the amount of $573,434.62 - Approved as
submitted.
5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of
January 13, 1992 - Received and filed.
FEBRUARY 4, 1992 PAGE 3
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
5.4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
22102, A REQUEST TO DIVIDE A 4.39 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO
LOTS AT 1575 VALLEY VISTA DRIVE WITHIN THE CM-BE-U/C
ZONE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - With
Council consent, the matter was continued to March 3,
1992.
5.5 DEER CROSSING SIGNS - MPT/Papen requested that this
matter be referred to the Traffic & Transportation
Commission and asked that it be dealt with at an
administrative level. By consensus, the item was
referred to the Traffic & Transportation Commission.
5.6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-45D: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL
RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF
SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES,
AND OTHER REGULATIONS
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Dr., stated that he
was opposed to the pay raise proposed for the City
Manager in light of the current economic situation.
C/Werner stated that the Personnel Committee conducted
a review of the City Manager's performance over the
last year and felt that because of his expertise;
qualifications and ability to control the City's
expenses, he should receive a raise.
Robert Arceo, 1106 "D" S. Cleghorn Dr., spoke against
the pay raise.
CM/Van Nort thanked the Council for their support and
recommended that the Council continue the matter until
the economy improves.
C/Werner moved, M/Kim seconded to continue the matter
of Resolution No. 90-45D with the exclusion of the City
Manager's increase to March 3, 1992. With the
following Roll Call vote, motion failed.
AYES:
COUNCILMEN
- Werner,
M/Kim
NOES:
COUNCILMEN
- Forbing,
Miller, MPT/Papen
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN
- None
C/Miller moved, C/Forbing seconded to adopt Resolution
No. 90-45D as proposed. With the following Roll Call
vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Forbing, MPT/Papen
NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, M/Kim
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
FEBRUARY 4, 1992 PAGE 4
6. OLD BUSINESS:
6.1 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING SERVICES
- CA/Arczynski stated that, due to a potential conflict
of interest, C/Forbing would remove himself from
discussion of this matter.
Asst. to CM/Butzlaff stated that on December 17, 1991,
Council directed staff to evaluate the capabilities and
qualifications of Community Disposal and Western Waste
Industries. Staff sent a Request for Information form
to the companies in order to obtain more precise
information on their solid waste collection, disposal
and recycling services and a preliminary analysis of
the two firms was conducted. However, it was felt that
in order to perform a more accurate evaluation of solid
waste collection services, staff believed it necessary
to broaden the scope of the process to include Waste
Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valleys. This
suggestion was based on service history of the company,
number of residential/commercial accounts serviced by
the company and its comparative capabilities. This
would provide greater flexibility in selecting a solid
waste provider for the community.
David Fahrion, Vice -President of CR&R Inc., 11292
Western Ave., Stanton, stated that by excluding his
company and Taormina Industries as well, the City has
excluded the only companies in Southern California
currently operating solid waste processing MRFs
(Material Recovery Facility) and fully automated
collection programs in compliance with AB939. Their
local subsidiary, Duran Environmental, was also
excluded from the process. He suggested that a new
evaluation process be conducted to allow all companies
to participate or allow CR&R Incorporated to be brought
into the current process.
Gilbert Apodaca, 614 Acolito P1., expressed concern
regarding franchising and the selection process and
suggested that the Council use an open competitive bid
process.
Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Dr., opposed an
exclusive franchise.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Rd., recommended that
the Council allow Duran and any other waste hauler to
participate as well as keeping the permit system now in
place going, in lieu of an exclusive franchise.
Dan Buffington, 2605 Indian Hill Creek, stated that he
felt it was time for the Council to make a decision
regarding the franchise.
FEBRUARY 4, 1992 PAGE 5
Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest stated he wanted freedom of
choice and suggested that cities wait until the State
tells them how to accomplish the State mandates.
Max Maxwell, 3211 Bent Twig Ln., opposed an exclusive
franchise.
Jim Donahue, representing Modern Service Co., asked to
be given the chance to submit a bid.
Asst. to CM/Butzlaff stated that legislation is
currently proposed to strengthen AB939 and reduce the
existing diversion level of 9.7% to approximately less
than 3%. If passed, the City will lose valuable
diversion rates and, as a result, would have to have a
more comprehensive program or take more aggressive
measures to achieve the 25% diversion rate in the
remaining 36 months. He recommended that the scope be
broadened to include Waste Management in the analysis
so that staff can prepare a more balanced comparison of
service levels offered by the three largest waste
providers to this community.
C/Werner stated that when the Council instructed staff
to negotiate with the two waste haulers, a second
directive was for staff to prepare and continue with an
open bid process that staff originally submitted. He
asked the status of the open bid process.
Asst. to CM/Butzlaff stated that the modified request
for proposal package was nearly complete but staff was
waiting for a decision on the current process before
the bid process is continued in approximately two to
three weeks.
C/Werner moved to initiate the RFP process immediately.
Motion died for lack of second.
C/Miller moved, MPT/Papen seconded to broaden the
request for information to include Waste Management of
San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc. With the following
Roll Call vote, the motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Miller, MPT/Papen, M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - Forbing
RECESS: M/Kim recessed the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
RECONVENE: M/Kim reconvened the meeting at 7:27 p.m.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matters
can be heard.
FEBRUARY 4, 1992 PAGE 6
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 89-97F: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL
- CM/Van Nort recommended that the positions of
Associate Engineer, Assistant to the City Manager and
Administrative Assistant be added to the City's
Conflict of Interest Code by adoption of the proposed
Resolution.
M/Kim opened the Public Hearing.
With no testimony offered, M/Kim closed the Public
Hearing.
C/Werner moved, C/Forbing seconded to adopt Resolution
89-97F. With the following Roll Call vote, motion
carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Werner, MPT/
Papen, M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
7.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - CDD/DeStefano
stated that the federal government annually allocates
Community Development Block Grant funds to cities for
the benefit of low and moderate income persons and
funds are used for community development, housing,
rehabilitation and public service programs. The funds
may only be used within low and moderate income census
tracts (none in D.B.) or to specifically benefit
persons of low and moderate income. The City received
$169,916 last year which was allocated toward
development of a Senior Citizen project with 10% set
aside for administrative purposes. The City again
expects to receive $169,916 as this year's allocation.
Activities proposed for consideration for 1992-93
includes funding for development of the Senior Citizen
center, and three requests from public service
providers have been received. Applicants include: 1)
Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA for $15,000 for continuation of
the after school day care facility; 2) the Westend YWCA
in Montclair for $5,749 toward implementation of a
program at the jr. high level to target high-risk girls
for development of self image and self esteem; and 3)
Old Baldy Council of the Boy Scouts of America for
$5,000 for camperships for 20 boys in the fifth and
sixth grades from lower income families who do not
currently participate in scouting activities.
M/Kim opened the Public Hearing.
Kristina Bulik-Holcum, 765 Shasta Way, Upland, repre-
senting YWCA of the West End, 5323 Holt, Montclair,
made a presentation regarding the Y -Teen program.
FEBRUARY 4, 1992
PAGE 7
In response to MPT/Papen's question, Ms. Holcum replied
that permission had been received from the Pomona
Unified School District for facility use at Lorbeer but
that the matter had not yet been discussed with the
Walnut Valley Unified for use of Chaparral and South
Pointe Middle Schools.
David E. Tate, representing the Old Baldy Council of
Boy Scouts of America, 1047 W. Sixth St., Ontario,
presented his proposal for camperships for 20 boys
within D.B.
Bob Quartucy, 21446 Broken Arrow, President of the Sr.
Citizens Club, spoke in support of the City providing
the seniors with a permanent and larger facility than
that proposed for construction at Heritage Park.
Jerry White, Branch Director of Diamond Bar/Walnut
YMCA, stated that the request for $15,000 would provide
a subsidy for children of low to moderate income for
the after school day care programs at the YMCA and
Golden Springs Elementary.
With no further testimony offered, M/Kim closed the
Public Hearing.
Following discussion, C/Werner moved and MPT/Papen
seconded to approve the budget: $15,000 for the YMCA;
$4,500 YWCA; $3,000 for the Boy Scouts; $1,000 for
senior citizen extra services, with the balance of the
CDBG budget to fund the Senior Center which would
include a roll-over of last year's allocation. With
the following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Werner, Forbing, MPT/
Papen, M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
8. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to
conduct, M/Kim adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
LYNDA BURGESS, CMC
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Mayor
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
1. CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M.
Litigation - G.C. Section 54956.9
Personnel - G.C. Section 54957.6
No reportable action taken.
2. CALL TO ORDER: M/Kim called the meeting to order
at 6:04 p.m. in the Council
Chambers, AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E.
Copley Dr.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge
of Allegiance by Junior Girl Scout
Troop 378.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Papen,
Councilmen Forbing, Miller and
Werner.
Also present were Terrence L.
Belanger, Assistant City Manager;
Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney;
James DeStefano, Director of
Community Development; Sid Mousavi,
Public Works Director/City Engineer
and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk.
City Manager Robert L. Van Nort was
excused.
3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: None offered.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jeff Nelson, 23051 Rio Lobos Rd.,
expressed concern that MPT/Papen had decided to run for
Assembly so soon after she was re-elected to the City
Council. In addition, he complained that a sign he had
posted on private property had been taken down by Al Flores,
the City's Code Enforcement officer and that a few days
after he had retrieved this sign, the Sheriff's Department
and a City truck went to his house looking to impound the
sign.
ACM/Belanger stated that he would be happy to discuss Mr.
Nelson's concerns at his convenience in the hope of
resolving the problem.
C/Werner asked for clarification as to whether or not Mr.
Nelson had been instructed to remove signs from behind City
offices, identification on the sign and what the specific
direction of the City Manager was.
C/Miller stated that he had heard that the sign was on
Montefino property and that they had requested the City to
remove it.
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
PAGE 2
ACM/Belanger stated that C/Miller's comment was accurate and
that the City had been asked to remove the sign since it had
been placed there without permission. Upon investigation,
it was determined that the sign was 32 sq. ft. in size and
that a portion of it straddled the City right-of-way. City
Code states that any sign over 6 ft. within the public
right-of-way is not permitted; therefore, this particular
sign was removed and transported to City Hall.
Beverly D'Errico, 23631 Prospect Valley, announced that on
Thursday, February 23, 1992 at the AQMD, a public meeting
will be held to address the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development scheduled for June in Brazil.
Betty Sanford, President of the United Nations Assn. in
Pasadena will be the guest speaker.
Clair Harmony, 24139 Afamado Ln. stated that M/Kim is
responsible for the conduct of the City and expressed his
feeling that a lot of "dirty tricks" were being played at
City Hall.
Bob Quartucy, 21446 Broken Arrow, President, D.B. Lively Sr.
Citizens responded to C/Forbing's question during a previous
meeting regarding contributions made by the organization for
the benefit of the community by reading a list of contribu-
tions made by individual members.
William Gross, 21637 Highbluff Rd., presented a transcript
of a legal opinion the City Attorney had given during
discussions regarding the Tonner Canyon project during the
January 21st meeting and stated that the opinion had no
legal foundation based on law, code or court case. He
further indicated that he felt the City Attorney had mislead
the Council.
CA/Arczynski replied that, on more than one occasion, he had
indicated that State Law is abundantly clear that the
project being discussed was a vesting tentative map; the
cases and law are clear as to the guidelines and General
Plan, or lack thereof, that the City must apply to projects,
and that changes in the General Plan cannot be applied to
this project. He stated that he would be happy to provide
staff with the most recent cases on this matter for trans-
mittal to Mr. Gross.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Dr., stated that he had
spoken with CM/Van Nort several times in the past regarding
the sign Ordinance and the Code Enforcement Officer's
conduct. He further stated that the sign ordinance does not
address what happens to signs after impound.by the City and
held for more than ten days.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Werner moved, C/Miller seconded
to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted.
FEBRUARY 18, 1992 PAGE 3
MPT/Papen stated that the Warrant Register amount had been
amended to $123,159.85.
C/Werner then moved to amend his motion, C/Miller seconded.
With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Forbing, Miller, Werner, MPT/Papen,
M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1.1 General Plan Advisory Committee - February
22, 1992 - 8:0,0-11:00 a.m., AQMD Room CC -2,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.2 Planning Commission - February 24, 1992 -
7:00 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
Dr.
5.1.3 Traffic & Transportation Commission -
February 27, 1992 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Hearing
Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.4 Parks & Recreation Commission - February 27,
1992 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Room CC -5, 21865 E.
Copley Dr.
5.1.5 General Plan Advisory Committee - February
29, 1992 - 8:00-11:00 a.m., AQMD CC -2, 21865
E. Copley Dr.
5.1.6 City Council Meeting - March 3, 1992 - 6:00
p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.7 City Council Study Session - March 10, 1992 -
6:00 p.m., AQMD CC -8 Room, 21865 E. Copley
Dr.
5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5.2.1 Regular Meeting of January 21, 1992 -
Approved as submitted.
5.2.2 Adjourned Regular Meeting of January 28, 1992
- Approved as submitted.
5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approved amended Warrant Register
dated February 18, 1992 in the amount of $123,159.85.
5.4 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
- Approved Professional Services Agreement retaining
emergency preparedness services and authorized the City
Manager to execute said agreement.
5.5 GRADING BOND EXONERATION, TRACT 2166 - Approved and
accepted grading Surety Bond No. 2-160-005-7 for the
first phase posted for the Diamond Bar Mobile Home
Estates, Tract No. 2166, located at 21217 Washington
Street in the amount of $61,432.
5.6 GRADING BOND EXONERATION, TRACT 38454 - Approved and
accepted grading construction on Tract No. 38454 and
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
exonerated
of $117,000
America for
Ln.
PAGE 4
Surety Bond No. KO 16-27-47-8 in the amount
.posted by Insurance Company of North
property located at Silver Hawk and Dublin
5.7 SANITARY SEWER BOND EXONERATION, TRACT 31850 - Approved
and accepted sanitary sewer improvements for Tract No.
31850 and exonerated a $270,000 faithful performance
surety bond No. 83SB-100-426-683 posted by Bramalea
Limited, Inc., for sanitary sewer improvements for
private contract numbers 10237 and 10237A, located on
Leyland Dr.
5.8 STORM DRAIN
Approved an
reduced the
1862, Tract
100426686 is
2145, Tract
Bond No. 83
BOND REDUCTIONS, TRACTS 31850 & 42564 -
3 accepted construction of storm drains and
surety bonds posted for Storm Drain No.
No. 31850 (Leyland Dr.), Bond No. 83 SB -
a the amount of $722,000 and Storm Drain No.
No. 42564 (Newbury Way and Leyland Dr.),
SB -100390298 in the amount of $362,000.
5.9 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-03: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT A
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1916 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND
IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE
THEREOF.
5.10 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE EAST SAN GABRIEL
VALLEY INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS
AUTHORITY AGREEMENT AND CORRESPONDING AIR QUALITY
MANAGEMENT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT - Approved Amendment
No. 3 modifying the East San Gabriel Valley Integrated
Waste Management Joint Powers Authority Agreement and
authorized the Mayor to execute the Air Quality Program
Participation Agreement enabling the City to partici-
pate with the JPA in the preparation of the Air Quality
Element.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.
6.1 PROCLAMATION - Proclaimed the week of March 8 - 14,
1992 as "Girl Scout Week." MPT/Papen presented the
Proclamation to Junior Girl Scout Troop 378.
6.2 UPDATE ON STATUS OF JCC PROJECT - CDD/DeStefano stated
that Tentative Tract Maps 47851 47850 and 48487 had
been continued to March 3, 1992 so that the developers
could provide a variety of responses to Council
concerns and the City engaged engineering and
FEBRUARY 18, 1992 PAGE 5
environmental consultants to review issues pertaining
to mitigation monitoring, responses to comments, sewer
analyses, soils analyses and other issues outlined by
the community and the City Council. He further
commented that the March 3rd public hearing date may
require further continuance due to lack of opportunity
for staff to provide a quality analysis of all the data
for Council's consideration, provide feedback to the
consultants, finalize the reports and provide the
analysis and reports to the community and City Council.
C/Werner asked the City Attorney for clarification as
to whether or not there needs to be a finding of
consistency with the General Plan.
CA/Arczynski stated that there is a requirement for
consistency of the General Plan; however, that finding
has to be made in the context of the date in which the
application was filed. Whatever Codes or Ordinances
were in place when the map application and other
documents were filed by Diamond Bar Associates with the
City, will be the controlling factors in which document
applies to it for analysis.
6.3 INTRODUCTION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR - M/Kim
introduced Mr. Phil Armentrout as the City's new
Emergency Services Coordinator.
Mr. Armentrout briefly described his background and
plans for development of the City's disaster plans.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-04: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
DEPOSIT FEE FOR THE PROCESSING OF STREET ADDRESS NUMBER
CHANGES - ACM/Belanger reported that, as a result of a
number of requests from residents, staff prepared a
proposed resolution which would accomplish two things:
establish a deposit fee for processing an address
number change and establish a procedure by which the
application can be processed and approved or
disapproved.
C/Miller requested that Section 7 be amended to read
"If the actual costs incurred do not exceed this
amount, the unused portion of deposit will be
refunded." He did not feel it appropriate to require
the owner to request a refund.
Martha Bruske, 600 S. Great Bend Dr., stated that she
was opposed to the matter and suggested that the
Council spend their time more wisely. She further
reminded the Council that she had made a specific
complaint at a previous meeting but has yet to hear
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
PAGE 6
from any City staff member in response.
C/Werner stated that he processes these type of
requests at another City and that the entire process
should require no more than one hour of staff's time.
He felt that the Resolution was unnecessary.
Following discussion, C/Forbing moved, C/Miller
seconded to adopt Resolution No. 92-04, as amended.
Withathe following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Miller, Forbing, MPT/Papen,
M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - Werner
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
RECESS: M/Kim recessed the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
RECONVENE: M/Kim reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS MATTER
CAN BE HEARD:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-05: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING A SERVICE
CHARGE FOR RELEASE OF STORED AND/OR IMPOUNDED VEHICLES
- ACM/Belanger reported that owners of vehicles
currently impounded/stored from within the City
boundaries are not charged for impound/storage expenses
yet the Sheriff incurs costs which are passed to the
City, via the Contract for Law Enforcement Services.
Reasons for impounding/storing vehicles may be due to
abandonment, expired registration, vehicle creating a
hazard, blocking a driveway, having more than 5
outstanding parking tickets, operation of vehicle by
unlicensed driver or with a suspended license. After
consultation with the Sheriff's Department, staff
determined a fee of $60.00 would cover the costs of
Sheriff and City personnel related to the release of an
impounded or stored vehicle. The proposed fee does not
include fees charged by the storage facility or for
towing charges.
M/Kim opened the Public Hearing.
Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs Dr., asked whether
the fee would defray costs and reduce the Sheriff's
Department billing to the City or go into the General
Fund.
ACM/Belanger stated that fees would initially go to the
General Fund but would also defray costs undertaken by
the Sheriff.
With no further testimony offered, M/Kim closed the
FEBRUARY 18, 1992 PAGE 7
Public Hearing.
C/Forbing moved, MPT/Papen seconded to adopt Resolution
No. 92-05. With the following Roll Call vote, motion
carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Forbing, Miller, MPT/
Papen, M/Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Forbing, C/Miller and C/Werner
announced that the public is free to contact them regarding
questions or concerns regarding City operations. C/Werner
repeated his hotline number of 861-1757.
MPT/Papen stated that she felt the same as her colleagues.
She further spoke regarding the sign ordinance and comments
that were made during the Public Comment portion of the
meeting. She suggested that Council consider setting up a
committee regarding signs.
CA/Arczynski suggested that anyone wanting to put up a sign
should first contact City staff in order to alleviate
confusion and problems.
10. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to
conduct, M/Kim adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
ATTEST:
Mayor
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Pro Tem Papen and Councilmember Forbing
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, March 3, 1992
DATE: February 25, 1992
Attached is the Voucher Register dated March 3, 1992. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
it's entry on the Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated March 3, 1992 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO.
FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
001
General Fund
$493,350.07
112
Prop A Fund
9,771.00
115
Int. Waste Mgt. Fund
288.00
138
LLAD #38 Fund
3,466.76
139
LLAD #39 Fund
5,860.95
141
LLAD #41 Fund
67.80
250
CIP Fund
3,004.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
c
Lind�G. �Ma4nu�so
Senior Accountant
$515,808.58
Phyll's E. Papen
Mayor Pro Tem
xL
ert L. Van Nort John A. Forbing
C ty Manager Councilmember
Diamond Sar •++
RUNTIME: 14:160226/92 VOUCHER REST5TER
DUE THRU.............03/03;92
VENDOR NAME VENDCR ID.
ACCOUNT PRO].TI-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO, ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accurate Lar.dsca.ce
Accurate
+138-4538-2210
1 20303A
+139-4539-2210
1 20303A
+138-4538-2210
2 20303A
+138-4538-5500
1 20303A
+139-4539-5500
1 20303A
Anderson. Patricia 164
+001-3478 1 203038
Armentrout, Phil Armentrout
+001-4440-4040 1 20303A
Bayless Stationers Bayless
+001-4210-1100 1 20303A
Beke, John C. BekeJ
+001-4553-4100 1 20303D
Bellofatto, Ruth E. 178
+901-3478 2 20303R
Brea. City of BreaCity
+001-4350-5300 1 20363A
+001-4350-5305 1 20383A
Cable Connectors. The CablConect
+001-4090-2200 2 20303A 01/1299
Chavers, J. Todd ChaversJT
+001-4553-4100 4 20303D
PAGE
+ + PREPAID } +
AMOUNT DATE CHEC'
--------------------------
02125
03/03
23781
Onerating Supplies
154.36
02;25
03;03
23788
Operating Supplies
216.62
02;25
03/03
23898
brass Seed
120.00
02125
03/03
24001
Feb Maint-Dist 38
3.100.02
02/25
03/03
24002
Feb Maint-Dist 39
51500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
9,091.16
021/25
03/03
2804
Recreation Refund
27.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
27.09
02/25
03/03
6101
Emer Svcs Coord-Feb 92
1,725.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
11125.04
02/25
03/03
11602823
Storagebox,Smartbox
64.71
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
64.71
02/25
03/03
Comm Mtos-Feb 13
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
40.04
02/25
03/03
2690
Recreation Refund
21.75
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
21.75
02/25
03/03
12528
Tiny Tots Prgrm-Fall 91
1,351.00
02/25
03/03
12528
6th Concert in the Park
185.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
1,536.00
02125
03/03
3313
Computer Maint
80.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
80.09
02/25
03/03
Comm Mtg Feb 13
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------)
40.00
+ + i c y o f O i a a n
Bar +++
RUN TIME: 14:16 02/26192 V O U C H E R REGISTER
DUE THRU.............03/031.'K
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PRO.J.TX-NO BATCH PC.LINE/N0. ENTRYIDUE INVOICE DESCRIPTiDN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cotiaunity Sweeping Comsweep
+^4i-4555-5521 1 203034
CopyMasters, The CopyMaster
+001-4090-2190 120303A
Crenshaw, Larry 168
+001-3474 1 203038
DK:S Associates
DKS
+001-4553-5222
1 20303A
+001-4553-5222
8 20303A
+001-4553-5222
7 20303A
+001-4553-5222
2 20303A
+001-4553-5222
3 20303A
+001-4553-5222
4 20303A
+001-4553-5222
5 20303A
+001-4553-5222
6 20303A
Dagaepat, Bernice 180
+001-3478 3 20303R
David Evans 8 Assoc. DavidEvans
+001-2300-1011 2 20303A
Dean, Lori 166
+001-3414 2 20303R
Dept of Transportation DeptTrans
+001-4555-5501 1 20303A
PAGE 2
+ PREPAID + +
AMDUNT DATE CHECK;
--------------------------
02/25
03/03
Sweeping Svcs -Jan 92
7.181.23
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1.181.23
02125
03103
958051
Jan Copier Svc
154.02
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
154.02
02/25
03103
1910
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
40.00
02125
03/03
14604
Consults Svcs-Trfc Study
7,960.00
02/25
03/03
14671
Retainage-Grand/Gldn Sprs
70.00
02/25
03/03
14686
Retainage-Caraash
11.50
02/25
03/03
14687
Queing Analysis-Path/BrCy
475.00
02/25
03103
14688
Pro Svcs-Trf Study -Grand
332.50
02/25
03103
14688
Retainage-DB/S1verHvk
65.00
02/25
0313
14688
Retainage-Path/BrCynRd
55.00
02/25
03/03
14688
Retainage-Queing PathlBCy
25.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
9,000.00
02/25
03/03
2489
Recreation Refund
24.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------';
24.04
02/25
03/03
05-2900
Pro Svcs-EIR 91-4
5,571.26
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------
5,571.28
02!25
03/03
1864
Recreation Refund
20.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------:,
20.06
02/25
03/03
120533
Signals/Lighting-Sep/Dec
172.22
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
172.22
ttt C i t v of Diamond Ear ttt
RUN TIME: 14:16 02/26/92 V O U C H E R R E S I S T E R
DUE THRU.............031,'03/92
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE!NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Desoto, Jennifer 161
*001-3414 3 203838
Diamond Bar Business Asoc DBBusAssoc
*881-4090-2210 1 20303D
Diamond Bar Stationers DDStationr
*801-4040-4880 1 20303A
ENVICOM Corporation ENVICOM
*081-2300-1011 1 20303A
Exxon ExxonS
1801-4310-2310 3 20303A
*001-4310-2310 4 20303A
*001-4210-2318 1 20303A
*001-4038-2310 1 20303A
*801-4310-2310 2 20303A
*001-4318-2310 1 20303A
+981-4310-2318 5 20303A
*801-4090-2310 1 20303A
Federal Express Corp. FedExoress
+901-4890-2120 1 283038
Fencon Inc.
+901-4038-1200
Foster, Barry T.
+081-3474
Fencon
2 203030 01/1115
171
5 20303R
PASE 3
* PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
--------------------------
02/25
03!03
1665
Recreation Refund
20.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
20.00
02125
03/03
March Common Area Maint
1,983.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,983.08
02!25
03/83
28256
Supplies-CClk
24.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
24.86
02/25
03/03
4693
Prof Svcs-EIR 91-3
19,288.09
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
19,286.09
02/25
83/03
4251422
Fuel-Prks 8 Maint
34.62
02/25
03/83
4257422
Fuel-Prks E Maint
32.31
02/25
03/03
4257433
Fuel -Ping
19.50
02/25
03/03
4257461
Fuel-Cmgr
14.04
02/25
83/03
4251702
fuel-Prks 6 Maint
17.80
82/25
03/03
4964444
Fuel-Prks i Maint
31.09
82/25
03/03
5662263
Fuel-Prks 6 Maint
18.60
82/25
63/63
6357962
Fuel -Sen Govt
17.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
185.89
02/25
03/03
455789868
Mailing -Grant Application
38.15
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
38.75
02/25
03/03
1432
Glass Top-CMGR
59.08
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
59.89
02/25
83/03
932
Recreation Refund
48.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
40.89
+++ Cite of D 1 a a 0 ^ d Bar +++
RUN TIME: 14:16 02/26/92 V O U C H E R R E_ I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03103/92
VENDOR NAME VENDOR, ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DE5CRIPTIDN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fritz, Art FritzA
+001-4553-4100 3 203033
Fromex Fromex
+801-4090-1100 1 203038
+001-4090-1100 2 20303B
GFOA SFOA
+081-4050-2320 1 20303D
GTE California GTE
+001-4313-2125 1 203038
Garcia, Al 169
+001-3474 4 20303R
Gonsalves 6 Son, Joe A. Gonsalves
+001-4810-4000 1 20303D
Highlander Publications Highlander
+881-2380-1010
4 203038
+001-4210-2115
2 203038
+801-2388-1810
2 20363B
+001-2308-1010
3 283038
+801-4210-2115
1 263038
+001-2300-1010
1 203838
Home Depot HomeDepot
+001-4310-1208 2 28303E 8411186
+001-4310-1208 1 203038 0311186
PAGE 4
+ PREPAID + +
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------
02!25
03/03
Comm Mta Feb 13
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
40.00
02125
03/03
5046254
Fila Processing
10.85
02125
03/03
5046290
Fila Processing
21.11
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
31.96
02/25
63/03
Financial Publication
46.49
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
46.49
02/25
03/03
Feb Phone Svc -Heritage Pk
60.96
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
60.96
82/25
03/03
1732
Recreation Refund
40.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
40.00
02/25
83103
March Prof Svcs
2,100.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
2,108.00
02125
03103
18209
PC Hrg 2/24 -TPM 50519
41.49
82/25
83103
22255
CDBG Pub Hrg 2/4
51.86
02/25
83163
26104
PC Hrg 2/24-TT51079
46.68
82125
83/03
26192
PC Hrg 2/24 -TPM 22966
42.97
02/25
03103
26287
PC Hrg 2/24 -OT 92-1
34.62
02/25
83103
3945
DD Hrg on ADR 91-03
33.34
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
251.16
02/25
03/03
1089
Operating Supplies
146.15
02/25
83/03
1098
Operating Supplies
37.02
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
183.17
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 5,192.56
Inland Valley D1y Bulletn IVDB
+001-2300-1010
9 20303B
+.+
C;tr
c
D i a m o r d Bar
+++
+001-4210-2115
RUN TIME: 14:16
02!26.92
03163
V
0 U C H
E R R E S I S T E R
+001-2300-1010
PAGE 5
02/25
03/03
dc26157
DUE
THRU
.............03103/92
8 203038
02/25
VENDOR NAME
dc26388
VENDOR 10.
61.59
+001-4210-2115
3 203038
02/25
+ + PREPAID +
ACCOUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRDJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINEiNO.
ENTRY/DUE
+001-2300-1010
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
02/25
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
ICMA Retirement
Trust -457
ICMA
+001-4210-2115
5 20303B
02125
03103
dc26428
+001-2110-1007
1
20303B
02125
03/03
Payroll Ded PP3
dc27581
190.00
+001-4030-0080
1
203038
02/25
03103
March Cafeteria
Contrib
400.00
+001-4034-0090
1
20303B
02/25
03/03
March -Cafeteria
Cont
1,163.78
+001-4040-0090
1
20303B
02125
03103
March Cafeteria
Cont
503.44
+001-4050-0090
1
203038
02/25
03103
March Cafeteria
Cont
400.41
+001-42104090
1
20303B
02/25
03103
March Cafeteria
Contr
511.24
+001-4310-0090
1
20303B
02125
03103
March Cafeteria
Contrib
730.21
+001-4510-0090
1
203038
02125
03/03
March Cafeteria
Contrib
1,267.48
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 5,192.56
Inland Valley D1y Bulletn IVDB
+001-2300-1010
9 20303B
02125
03103
dc24900
PC Hrg 2124 TT50519
67.50
+001-4210-2115
4 203038
02/25
03163
dc25491
CD86 Pub Hrg 2/4
72.00
+001-2300-1010
6 203036
02/25
03/03
dc26157
CDD Hrg 2/10 -ADR 91-03
47.25
+001-2300-1010
8 203038
02/25
03103
dc26388
PC Hrg 2/24 TM 22986
61.59
+001-4210-2115
3 203038
02/25
03183
dc26425
Pc Hrg 2/24 -OT 92-1
54.00
+001-2300-1010
5 203038
02/25
03/93
dc26426
PC Hrg 2/24 TM 51079
14.25
+001-4210-2115
5 20303B
02125
03103
dc26428
PC Hrg ADR 92-1,92-2,92-3
85.50
+061-2300-1010
7 20303B
02/25
03163
dc27581
CDD Hrg ADR 92-1
56.25
+001-2300-1010
10 203038
02/25
03103
dc27598
CDD Hrg ADR 92-2,92-3
69.75
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 594.04
Inland Valley D1y
Bulletn IVDB
+001-4040-2115
2 20303E
02125
03/03
dc27344
Pub Hrg-Iepound Vehcl Fee
45.00
+001-4040-2115
1 20303B
02125
03/03
dc28873
Proposals-Codificatn Svcs
27.04
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
72.00
Kens Hardware
Kens
+001-4310-1300
2 283038 1011277
02/25
03/03
54334
Operating Supplies
39.50
+001-4310-1300
1 203838 09/1277
82125
03/03
54687
Operating Supplies
4.43
+001-4310-1300
3 203638 11/1277
02/25
03103
54616
Operating Supplies
7.11
+001-4350-1200
1 283838 08/1277
02125
03103
54647
Vrench-Recreation
1.07
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
52.11
Kotin Reqan b Mouchly In. Kotin
+001-1210 3 203038 02/25 03103 dia183-1 Tres Her -Industry share 15,695.74
+001-4210-4240 4 20383B 01/1293A 82125 03/03 dia103-1 Tres Here -City Share 15,695.73
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 31,391.41
L.A. County -Sheriff's Dep LACSheriff
+001-4411-2200 1 203038 02/25 03/63 91622 Jan Contract Svcs 297,217.33
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------> 297,217.33
}}} C i t y o f D i a e o" d B a r }}}
RUN TIME: 14:16 02/26192 V O U C H E P R E G I S' E R
DUE THRU.............03/03i92
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TN-ND BATCH PO.LINEiNO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L.A.County Public Works LACPubWk
}001-4555-5507 2 203033
LA County Agriculture Coe LACAgric
}001-4331-2210 1 203038
LaserQuipt LaserQuipt
+001-4090-2200 3 20303B
Leaque of CA Cities League2
481-4018-2325 1 203033
League of CA Cities League3
+001-4210-2330 1 20303D
League of Ca. Cities League
+801-4090-2315 1 20303B
Lippe, Debra 119
}801-3478 4 203038
Manaqement Action Program MAP
+001-4010-2325 4 20303F
Mariposa Horticultural Mariposa
}001-4311-5380 1 20303C
+001-4313-5300 1 20303C
+001-4316-5360 1 20303C
+001-4319-5300 1 20303C
+001-4322-5388 1 20303C
+001-4325-5300 1 20303C
}001-4326-5300 1 20303C
+001-4331-5300 1 20303C
PAGE 5
* PREPAID } }
AMOUNT DATE CHECK.
--------------------------------
02/25
03/83
9200002792
Dec-Trfc Signal Maint
4,093.35
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
4,093.35
02/25
03/03
106611
Dec Pest Control -Sycamore
1,099.66
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,099.66
02/25
03/03
30544
Replacement Parts -Printer
129.90
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
129.90
02/25
03/03
LA Cty Mtg-Mayor Kim
20.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
20.00
02/25
03/03
Planners Institute -April
900.08
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
900.00
02/25
03/03
21237
1992 Membership Dues
7,874.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------j
7,674.00
02125
03/03
2818
Recreation Overpayment
12.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
12.00
02/26
83/03
Mgmt Wrkshop 3/27-29
1,695.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,695.00
02/25
03/03
3036
Jan Svcs -Paul Grow Prk
995.00
02/25
63/83
3038
Jan Svcs -Heritage
663.00
02/25
03/83
3038
Jan Svcs -Maple Hill
829.08
02/25
83/63
3036
Jan Svcs -Petersen
1,244.00
02/25
83/03
3038
Jan Svc -Reagan
995.00
02/25
03/03
3836
Jan Svcs-Starshine
415.00
02/25
03/03
3036
Jan Svcs-Suesitridge
1,492.00
02/25
83/03
3036
Jan secs -Sycamore Cyn
1,528.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
8,161.00
+++
Cit/
of
Diamond
Bar *++
RUN TIME: 14:16
02/26192
V
0 U C
H E R R
E S I S T E R
PAS 7
DUE THRU
.............03iO3!92
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR 1D.
+ + PREPAID + +
ACCOUNT PRDJ.T1-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
McMillian, Mike
172
+001-3474
6
20303R
02/25
03103
1857
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.04
Meyer, David
MverD
+001-4350-4100
4
20303C
02/25
03/03
Prk b Rec Mtgs Jan/Feb(2)
80.09
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
80.09
Miller, Laura
165
+001-3478
5
20303R
02/25
03/03
2243
Recreation Refund
30.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
30.00
Miss Diamond Bar
Beauty
MissDB
+001-4010-2325
3
20303D
02125
03103
25th Annual Pageant
126.00
+001-4030-2325
1
20303D
02/25
03103
25th annual Pageant
30.04
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
150.00
Myers, Elizabeth
MyersE
+001-4210-4000
1
20303C
02/25
03103
92db03
Ping Comm 2/10
612.00
+001-4310-4000
1
203030
02/25
03103
92db03
Prks 8 Rec mtg 2/13
162.00
+001-4553-4000
1
20303C
02/25
03/03
92db03
Trfc 6 Trans Mtg 2/13
306.00
+115-4515-4000
1
20303C
02/25
03/03
92db03
Solid Waste Verbatim
288.04
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,368.00
O.E.I Business Forms
OEIBusines
+001-4050-1100
1
20303C
02/25
03/03
Computer Paper
59.13
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
59.13
Ortiz, Thomas
OrtizT
+001-4553-4100
2
29303D
02/25
03/03
Comm Mtg Feb 13
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.04
Pacesetter Building Svcs
Pacesetter
+001-4090-2140
1
20303C
02/25
03/03
1/2 Rent of Suite 190 -Feb
3,557.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
3,557.64
Parmar, Kanuji
163
+001-3478
6
20303R
02/25
03/03
2556
Recreation Refund
71.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
71.00
+++ City of Diamond Bar +++
RUN TIME: 14:16 @2/261,92 V 0 U C H E R R E G I 5 T E R PAGE 6
DUE THRU.............03/03/92
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + + PREPAID + +
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/ND. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payroll Transfer PayrollTr
+081-1020 1 20303E 02125 03/03 Payroll Transfer - PP4 42,300.00 03103/92 0000000004
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----> 42,300.00
Pfeiffer, Rick 113
+001-3474 1 20303R 02/25 03/03 1853
Pitney Bores PitneyBoae
+001-4090-2310 2 20303C 02/25 03/03
Plunk, Lydia E. PlunkL
+001-4350-4100 3 20303C 02/25 03/03
Pomona Vly Transportation PomonaViy
+112-4360-5315 1 20303C
Possemato, Steve
+001-3474
Postage By Phone
+001-4090-2120
170
8 20303R
PostByPhon
2 20303C
Public Empl Retirement PERS
+001-2110-1008 1 263630
+001-2110-1008 2 20303D
Raes, Werner 114
+001-3414 9 20363R
02/25 03/03
02/25 03/03 1788
02/25 63/03
02/25 03/03
02/25 63103
02/25 03103 1858
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.00
Postg Meter Rent-Apr/June
197.02
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
197.02
Prk 8 Rec Mtgs Jan/Feb(4)
160.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
160.00
Hal Shuttle-Nov,Dec 91
9,465.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
9,465.00
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
40.00
Postage Replenishment
1,000.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
1,000.00
Employee Contrib-PP4
2,664.77 03/03/92 0000013265
Employer Contrib-PP 4
3,260.60 03/03/92 0000013265
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
6,125.57
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
Recreation Refund
30.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
30.00
+++ Citv c Diamond Bar +++
RUN TIME: 14:16 02/26/92 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
DUE THRU.............03103192
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID. + + PREPAID + +
ACCOUNT PROJ.T1-NO BATCH PO.LINEiNO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Wada 8 Associates Robert Wada
+001-1210
4
20303C
02:25
03/03
92-3354
Topo maps -Tres Hermanos
141.24
+001-4210-4240
5
20303C
02/25
03103
92-3354
Topo Maps -Tres Hermanos
141.25
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
282.49
Robertson, Virgil
1;5
+001-3474
10
20303R
02/25
03103
1850
Recreation Refund
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
40.00
Roesch Lines Inc.
RoeschLine
+112-4360-5310
1
20303D
02/25
03103
Rec Svcs -Laughlin
286.00 03/03/92 0000013266
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----':
286.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
6.00
Rolfingsmeyer, Louise
192
+001-3476
7
203038
02/25
03103
2868
Recreation Refund
24.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
24.00
RonKranzer6Assoc C.E.
Inc RKA
+001-4551-5223
1
20303C
02/25
03103
926601
Jan Plan Chk Svcs
2,228.45
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
2,226.45
Ruzicka, Joseph T.
RuzickaJ
+001-4350-4100
2
20303C
02/25
03103
Prk 6 Rec Mtgs Jan/Feb(4)
160.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
160.00
San Gabriel Vly Tribune
S6VTribune
+001-2300-1010
14
20303C
02/25
03103
sgvt5041
Pc Hrg 2/24 TTM 50519
69.92
+001-4210-2115
8
20303C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5047
CDBG Pub Hrg 2/4
68.09
+001-2300-1010
13
28343C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5815
Hrg 2/10 ADR91-03
49.66
+001-2360-1010
it
20343C
02/25
03103
sgvt5893
PC Hrg 2/24 TT51079
71.76
+001-4210-2115
6
20363C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5094
PC Hrg 2/24 OT92-1
52.44
+001-2300-1010
12
20303C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5095
PC Hrg 2/24 TM 22966
65.32
+001-4210-2115
7
20303C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5096
ADR 92-1,92-2,92-3
85.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
462.76
San Gabriel Vly Tribune
S6VTribune
+001-4040-2115
4
20363C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5144
Pub Hrg-Impound Vehicles
42.32
+001-4040-2115
5
20303C
02/25
03103
sgvt5189
Proposals Codification
27.68
+001-4040-2115
3
20303C
02/25
03/03
sgvt5281
Pub Hrg-CUP 91-14
49.73
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
119.65
+++
C i t v of
Diamond
Par +++
RUN TIME: 14:16 02%26,`92,
V 0 U C H_
P. R
E S I S T E R
PAGE 14
DUE THRU
.............03/03/72
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
+ + PREPAID + +
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Securicorp int`1 Inc.
Securicorp
+001-4553-5531
1 20303D
02/25 03103
11912
Jan Crossg Guard Svc
5,693.63
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
5,693.63
Securitv Pac Nati bank
SecuritPa
+001-4010-2325
2 20303D
02/25 03/03
Mtq School SubCommittee
114.110
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
114.14
Siecke, Warren C.
SieckeW
+001-4553-5222
9 20303C
02/25 03103
2720-9
Engr Design Svcs
1,350.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
1,350.00
Sir Speedy
SirSpeedy
+001-4030-2110
1 20303C
02/25 03/03
6269
Printing Svcs
21.27
+001-4210-2110
1 26303C
02/25 03/03
6269
Printing Svc
63.85
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
85.12
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+138-4538-2126
1 20303D
02/25 03/03
Electric Dist 138 -Jan
92.40
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------r
92.40
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+139-4539-2126
1 20303D
02/25 03/03
Electric Dist 139 -JAN
144.13
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
144.13
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+141-4541-2126
1 203030
02125 03103
Electric Dist t41 -Jan
67.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
67.80
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+001-4555-2126
1 203630
02125 03/03
Electric-Trfc Control JAN
4,548.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i
4,546.56
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
+001-4316-2126
1 203030
02/25 03/03
Electric -Maple Hill Prk
265.09
+001-4328-2126
1 20303D
02/25 03103
Electric-Summitridge Prk
238.72
+001-4331-2126
1 20303D
02/25 03103
Electric -Sycamore Cyn
262.77
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i
766.56
+tc City
of Diamond
Bar +�
RUN TIME: 14:16 9 2% 2 6%
9 2
V 0 LI C H E R
R E S I S T E R
PASE
FUND
SUt!AARY
REPORT
DUE THRU.............43i03192
DISBURSE
SiL
G3E WiLL
POST SOE HAS POSTED
FUTURE
TRANSACTIONS
FUND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
DIRECT PAY
REVENUE
EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE
REVENUE
EXPENSE
138LLAD 138 Fund
3,466.16
3,466.76
139LLAD 139 Fund
5,860.95
5,864.95
O016enerai Fund
493,350.07
90,559.58
599.15
402,194.74
115Int Waste rgmt Fu
288.00
288.00
112Proo A -Transit Fu
9,711.04
9,711,40
141LLAD 141 Fund
67.60
61.84
250C.I.P. Fund
3,004.00
3.444.40
TOTAL
------------
------------
------------
------------------------------------
------------
------------
ALL FUNDS
515,808.58
90,559.58
599.15
424,649.25
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO.r1.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
MEETING DATE: March 03, 1992 1hr/1 REPORT DATE: February 24, 1992
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson; Senior Accountant
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - January 31, 1992
SUMMARY:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for
the month of January 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office)
` Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes_ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Robert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger Li da G. M tson
City Manager Assistant City Manager Senior Accou aut
F:\WP51\AGENDA\C0VER.FRN
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: February 24, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - January 31, 1992
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance department presents the monthly Treasurer's
Statement for the City Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the January, 1992 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement
for the month of January 1992. This statement shows the cash balances
for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances and
investment account balances.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G Magnuson
F:\NP51\WORK\AGENDA\AGE-RPT.FRM
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
January 31, 1992
GENERAL FUND
-:- .�-
$5,224,565.88
:.......:.-
$790,936.84
$729,333.42
$126,324.84
$5,412,494.14
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
50,073.21
8,498.82
(16,177.60)
42,394.43
GASTAXFUND
2,104,509.09
234,184.43
1,090.30
(121,119.62)
2,216,483.60
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
657,484.45
62,306.33
22,073.80
697,716.98
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FD
0.00
0.00
0.00
FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND
0.00
9,460.28
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
10,295.91
6,769.16
7,604.79
(57,584.34)
OTS FUND
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
(57,584.34)
9,030.07
62.57
4,900.00
4,192.64
STATE PARK GRANT FUND
0.00
0.00
15,346.00
PARK FEES FUND
0.00
15,346.00
65,000.45
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
47,773.21
24,399.07
7,171.83
192,802.05
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
189,255.04
13,007.94
9,460.93
91,445.94
LANDSCAPE DIST#41 FD
91,826.53
13,596.24
13,976.83
507,478.39
GRAND AV CONST FUND
514,217.11
6,738.72
342,407.37
TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE FD
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
342,407.37
39,974.65
4,959.07
2,505.30
10,972.38
53,400.80
SB 821 FUND
19,446.55
313.30
19,759.85
SELF INSURANCE FUND
243,968.24
3,930.46
247,898.70
TOTALS
$9,487,242.97
$1,178,310.23
$804,855.92
$0.00
$9,860,697.28
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT $199,694.35
PAYROLL ACCOUNT 488.99
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
TIME CERTIFICATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER
L.A.I.F.
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
$0.00
0.00
9,660,013.94
$200,683.34
9,660,013.94
TOTAL CASH $9,860,697.28
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 9, 1992
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Chavers called the meeting to order at
6:30 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management
District Hearing Room, 21865 East Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, California.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Ortiz, Beke, Fritz, Vice Chairman
Gravdahl, and Chairman Chavers.
Also present were City Engineer Sid Mousavi,
Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra, Associate
Engineer David Liu, Sergeant Rawlings, and Contract
Secretary Liz Myers.
MINUTES: Motion was made by C/Ortiz, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Minutes of
December 12, 1991.
COMMISSION C/Ortiz requested an updated list of the Traffic
COMMENTS: and Transportation Commission members, and a copy
of Ordinance 28a, the 1989 revision of the duties
and responsibilities of the Traffic and
Transportation Commission.
C/Beke suggested that the Commission packets be
distributed a week prior to the meeting to allow
the Commission adequate time to review it.
VC/Gravdahl recommended that the Commission read
the article, printed in the Windmill in December,
suggesting to the Regional Postmaster, in the City
of Industry, to combine zip codes 91765 and 91789
to help speed up mail delivery in Diamond Bar. In
reference to the request made by Councilwoman
Papen, asking the City Council to support her in
writing a letter to the LACTC regarding the green
line train, he suggested that Chair/Chavers, in
behalf of the Commission, also write a letter
supporting her efforts.
Chair/Chavers indicated that he would contact
Councilwoman Papen to see if she prefers the
Commission to either add a single signature, on
behalf of the Commission, to the Council's position
letter, or draft a separate letter of support that
would be similarly worded. In response to C/Beke's
concern, Chair/Chavers clarified that, as a body,
the Commission's intent is to encourage that money
be spent wisely. If the Council's position is
anything but this, then he will forego any further
action. The Commission concurred to follow this
action.
January 9, 1992 Page 2
PUBLIC Bruce Flamenbaum, a resident, noting that numerous
COMMENTS: speeding tickets are cited at the base of Diamond
Bar Blvd. and Gold Rush, inquired why the speed
limit is lowered at the base of that hill.
Sgt. Rawlings explained that the reason the speed
limit is 40 mph is because it is within a school
area. The motorists that have been cited at the
base of the hill have been traveling in excess of
the 45 mph speed limit posted previously.
Edward Beach, residing at 20752 E. Rim Lane, stated
the following concerns: motorists speeding on
Peaceful Hills between Pathfinder and Canyon Ridge,
particularly at Rim Lane; and motorists speeding on
Pathfinder between Brea Canyon Cut-off and Brea
Canyon.
CE/Mousavi, in response to Chair/Chavers' inquiry,
confirmed that there was a request for a four way
stop sign at Peaceful Hills and Pathfinder, but it
was determined not to be warranted.
Chair/Chavers requested staff to forward the
Pathfinder information to Mr. Beach. With respect
to the Peaceful Hills subdivision, Chair/Chavers
requested staff to conduct a windshield type survey
and to place it on the next meeting's agenda as an
informational item.
CONSENT CALENDAR:Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by C/Ortiz and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve item A of the
Consent Calendar, and to pull items B and C.
Paint Red Curb CE/Mousavi reported that the request to restrict
& a Centerline recreational parking and paint a centerline divider
Divider at on Montefino is an attempt to minimize the
Montefino Ave. visibility restriction which exists on Montefino.
Staff recommended to paint the curb red, and paint
a center line divider 450 feet from Diamond Bar
Blvd. to Paseo de Terrado on Montefino Avenue.
CE/Mousavi, in response to C/Beke, confirmed that,
if parking is restricted, there is sufficient other
parking on Montefino Avenue.
C/Beke suggested the skip centerline stripe divider
be painted from Grand Avenue to Diamond Bar Blvd.
on Montefino Avenue.
C/Ortiz requested that the staff report be amended
to indicate that the request is to "restrict"
parking and not "remove" recreational parking.
January 9, 1992 Page 3
C/Fritz stated that he would prefer that the
residents in the area be notified that parking
will be restricted.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by C/Fritz and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve staff's
recommendation, with the addition of extending the
centerline stripe through the entire section of
Montefino from Grand to Diamond Bar Boulevard.
Staff is to delay activity until notice has been
provided to the Condo Association, and they have
had 30 days to respond.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fritz, Beke, Ortiz,
VC/Gravdahl and
Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
Traffic Study CE/Mousavi reported that, as requested by the
for the Commission at the December 12, 1991 meeting, staff
Summitridge/ has compiled some information regarding the traffic
Brookwood Comm. operations and traffic circulation within in the
Summitridge/Brookwood community. However, staff
has not had an opportunity to do a full analysis of
the compiled data.
AE/Liu stated that it is staff's recommendation
that the Commission review and discuss the
informational items, and direct staff accordingly.
C/Beke expressed his concern that the staff report
does not address any of the items specifically
requested by Chair/Chavers at the December 12th
meeting. He also noted that, after reviewing the
accident reports, each of the accidents in that
area involved a Diamond Bar resident, not by-pass
traffic as was first presumed.
C/Ortiz volunteered to be one of the members of a
sub -committee, of the Commission, to work on an
education program with the residents in the area.
The following are the items that Chair/Chavers
would like staff to address: the kind of
circulation study best suited for a residential
neighborhood; the general nature of the scope of
that study; the goals and objectives that could be
addressed at a reasonable cost; and a method of
invoking input from the citizens. He volunteered
to assist C/Ortiz on the sub -committee.
January 9, 1992
CE/Mousavi,
stated that
rest of the
services.
Page 4
in response to
there is $7,885 in
fiscal year, for
C/Ortiz's inquiry,
the budget for the
use of consultant
Motion was made by VC/Gravdahl, seconded by C/Ortiz
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to have staff bring back
the requested information for the next meeting, and
to have the sub -committee meet with staff within
the next two weeks for the purpose of developing a
format for the education program.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz,
VC/Gravdahl Ortiz,
Chair/Chavers. a n d
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
C/Ortiz requested to be excused from the meeting at
7:18 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS:
Traffic Oper. AE/Liu reported that the
on Pathfinder Commission had directed
staff on November 14
at Brea Canyon traffic signal design,1991 to proceed with the
west of State way stop sign is feasible at nd tod the Pathfinder hand
Route 57 Brea Canyon Y Road intersection
measure. as an interim
It is recommended that the Commission
review the attached analysis and recommend the
installation of the three was stop sign as an
interim mitigation measure to the City Council.
Motion was made by C/Fritz to accept staff's
recommendation. Motion failed for lack of a
second.
C/Beke, concerned if the 57 southbound off ramp
would function properly, noted that there is about
a half car to a car short of clearing the cue every
cycle.
Chair/Chavers inquired how staff proposes tc
monitor the three way stop sign, for what period of
time, and under what circumstances will the stop
signs be placed interimwise.
CE/Mousavi explained that the intent was to
observe, and record, the a.m. and p.m. operations,
at different days of the week, and to verify the
limits anticipated. Staff would then
prepare a
report of the findings, back to the Council, a
month or so after installation, with staff's
recommendation. The installation of the stop sign
January 9, 1992
Page 5
comes with the understanding that it is a temporary
measure.
C/Beke, concerned with the potential liability upon
removal of the stop sign, cautioned that an
incident may arise where someone is not aware that
the stop sign has been removed, and expects that
traffic to continue to stop, but it does not.
Chair/Chavers recommended that the interim
mitigation measure suggested, be interim until
installation of the signal. The City Manger also
requested this item be postponed.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by
Chair/Chavers and FAILED for lack of a majority to
accept staff's recommendation.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fritz and Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke and VC/Gravdahl.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz.
CE/Mousavi reported that, as a result of the
Commission's request that a policy for funding of
traffic signals on private/public street
intersections be developed, two proposals have been
developed with a formula determining the fair share
contributions for proposed development, and
existing development.
C/Beke, referring to the proposed development
formula, questioned who would pay for the signal if
the other projects" don't materialize for decades.
CE/Mousavi explained that if it is determined that
a signal may be warranted, upon development of
various projects in the future, the developer will
be asked to pay for their fair share of the costs
based on this formula. The amount would then be
held until it is required.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by
Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the
matter to the next meeting.
Policy for
Funding Traffic
CE/Mousavi stated that the City Manager and staff
Signals on
request that the item be postponed to the next
Pub./Priv. St.
meeting to allow staff time to provide requested
additional information to
Intersections
management.
Chair/Chavers noted that the Commissioners may have
some comments that should be included in staff's
information to management.
CE/Mousavi reported that, as a result of the
Commission's request that a policy for funding of
traffic signals on private/public street
intersections be developed, two proposals have been
developed with a formula determining the fair share
contributions for proposed development, and
existing development.
C/Beke, referring to the proposed development
formula, questioned who would pay for the signal if
the other projects" don't materialize for decades.
CE/Mousavi explained that if it is determined that
a signal may be warranted, upon development of
various projects in the future, the developer will
be asked to pay for their fair share of the costs
based on this formula. The amount would then be
held until it is required.
January 9, 1992
Page 6
Chair/Chavers indicated that, under AB1600, the
City may be obligated to expend those funds within
a certain time frame.
C/Beke, referencing the existing development
formula, stated that since private streets are not
open to the general public, and is a disruption to
the general motoring public, the private
development community should pay for a signal, if
they so desire one.
Chair/Chavers, not satisfied with DKS Associates'
analysis, recommended that staff do a specific
sketch of the whole intersection.
Motion was made by Chair/Chavers, seconded by
C/Beke and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the item
and requested staff to do a schematic plan.
VC/Gravdahl noted that the City benefits from the
taxes and revenues received from residents of these
private communities. These residents should expect
to have a safe ingress and egress from their
properties.
Chair/Chavers stated that if the City does see fit
to fund a certain portion, then the best approach
may be to fund it from the impact fee program that
the City is currently embarking upon.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter to
the February meeting with the Commission's concerns
relayed to CM/Van Nort.
Operational
CE/Mousavi reported that the Commission directed
Analysis for
the staff, on the November 14, 1991 meeting, to proceed
Intersection
of with an operational analysis of the intersection of
Grand/Golden
Grand Ave. and Golden Springs, and propose other
Springs
improvements to that intersection. Upon staff's
request, DKS Associates has completed the analysis
for the subject location and has proposed several
alternatives for the intersection improvements.
After review of their report, and staff's analysis,
a short term and long term solution has been
provided. It is recommended that the Commission
consider the solutions indicated in the staff
report, and recommend to the City Council that the
short term solution be implemented within this
fiscal year. It is further recommended that the
left turn lane be extended on northbound Grand
Ave., to west bound Golden Springs, to provide
additional storage area for cars attempting to turn
left.
Chair/Chavers, not satisfied with DKS Associates'
analysis, recommended that staff do a specific
sketch of the whole intersection.
Motion was made by Chair/Chavers, seconded by
C/Beke and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the item
and requested staff to do a schematic plan.
January 9 1992
Page 7
Application of CE/Mousavi reported that, upon research of the
Speed Humps/Bumps usage of speed bumps/humps in cities surrounding
Diamond Bar, it is staff's recommendation that the
Commission deny requests associated with the
installation of speed bumps/humps as traffic
control devices on residential streets. However,
the City Attorney has requested that the item be
continued to the next meeting to allow time to
provide their opinion on this matter.
Chair/Chavers requested staff to convey to the City
Attorney that it would be appreciated if input
would be given before the item becomes an agenda
item.
C/Fritz indicated that, if the City Attorney
determines speed bumps/humps to be a liability
problem, he would like to see actual cases that
have had decisions on this issue, if possible.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the matter as
requested by staff and the attorney.
TTC Attending CE/Mousavi reported that this item was placed on
PC Meetings the agenda, per Commission's request, for
discussion. It is recommended that the Commission
direct staff as necessary.
Chair/Chavers explained that the Commission is not
looking for a formal procedural policy forcing
issues to come through the TTC, then to the
Planning Commission, but rather a way for the TTC
to be kept abreast of what the Planning Commission
is doing.
VC/Gravdahl suggested that the Commission attend
the Planning Commission meetings, on a rotating
basis, merely for informational purposes, and
report back to the Traffic Commission. He also
suggested that the TTC receive a copy of the
Planning Commission's agendas.
Bruce Flamenbaum, a member of the Planning
Commission, suggested that the Commission take a
more proactive stance, rather than just attending
the meetings. He concurred that the commissions
need to be more coordinated in their activities.
C/Fritz indicated that if there is a body with
knowledge on traffic matters, then they ought to be
allowed an opportunity to comment, even in an
advisory capacity.
January 9, 1992 Page S
CE/Mousavi explained that there would need to be a
formulated process determining when traffic studies
would come first to the Traffic Commission before
it is presented to the Planning Commission.
C/Fritz stated that there should be a policy
indicating that traffic reports must come to the
Traffic Commission for their recommendation.
Chair/Chavers directed staff to provide the TTC
with the Planning Commission's agendas, and a copy
of any traffic studies received, along with staff's
recommendation. Staff should form a letter from
the TTC to the Planning Department and the Planning
Commission formally indicating our interest in
participation, suggesting how we are going to
participate, and specifically requesting their
response to that.
C/Fritz stated that, additionally, this should be
embodied in a formal policy statement.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Beke and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to formulate a
policy which provides that the Commission receives
a copy of the Planning Commission's agendas, and a
copy of any items that have a traffic study, in a
timely way to allow an opportunity for comment.
That policy is to be brought back to the Commission
for a recommendation.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, VC/Gravdahl,
and Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz.
White Paper CE/Mousavi reported that the item was placed on the
agenda, per Commission's request, for discussion.
It is recommended that the Commission direct staff
as necessary.
Chair/Chavers submitted a copy of a draft "White
Paper" to staff and the Commission. He requested
staff to find out when the final "White Paper" must
be submitted.
Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Beke and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the item to the
next meeting.
January 9, 1992
NEW BUSINESS:
Page 9
Curb Marking AE/Liu addressed the Commission regarding the
Diamond Bar Blvd. request from Mr. Corkrum, of Diamond Bar High
School, to install white curb markings along the
north side of Pathfinder Road, east of Evergreen
Springs Dr. and along east side of Brea Canyon
Road, south of Pathfinder, as shown on the attached
aerial map. Currently, the intersection of
Pathfinder Rd. and Evergreen Springs Dr. receives
crossing guard service. Staff has conducted site
visits and concludes that the installation of white
curb markings will improve the high school's onsite
traffic circulation. It is recommended that the
Commission concur with staff's recommendation to
install white curb markings at the above mentioned
locations.
C/Beke stated that, since this is solely for the
benefit of the school, the school should pay for
it. He then suggested the use of passenger loading
zone signs, instead of painting the curb white,
since it is difficult to remove paint from the
curb.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by
Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept
staff's recommendation to remove parking on these
locations on Pathfinder and Brea Canyon Rd., with
the exception that, in lieu of putting white curbs,
"No Parking Passenger Loading Only" signs are
posted, as well as recommend that all work be done
at the school's expense. It is further recommended
that the high school have some awareness program
informing the parents that this is to be done.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, VC/Gravdahl,
and Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz.
Traffic Impact AE/Liu reported that staff has been working with
Report Guidelines DKS and Associates to develop the guidelines for
the preparation of Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
reports. It is recommended that the Commission
review and recommend the adoption of the Guidelines
for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Analysis
Report to the City Council.
January 9, 1992
Page 10
Chair/Chavers requested the following changes:
Study Area, page 2, needs to specify a time frame
for discussion; such discussion should be during a
scoping meeting; General Information, item 1,
should specify the period for the growth factor, or
just require that the City Engineer provide that;
omit 8 Lanes Divided in the table of Recommended
Daily Roadway Capacity Values; make the standards
more rigid; Project Impact, page 6, item 1, needs
specific direction as to when the City must approve
estimated rates prior to acceptance; Mitigation,
page 71 omit 5.a; Mitigation, page 7, 5.c, is
ambiguous; suggested including,
signalization, changes to signa zat on M dwell as
an analysis of the correction of
Mitigation, page 7, delete 5signals;
.e. and strongly urged
staff to include an "or else" in the Impact Fee
program; page 8, item 6, omit "particularly heavy";
page 8, item 7, omit "with the" and add "through'w;
Page 8, delete items 9, 10, and 11; page 8, item
14, needs a policy; page 9, reword items 16 and 17
to indicate that it is an interim statement and
subject to change; and page 9, final paragraph,
omit first sentence.
CE/Mousavi, in response to C/Fritz, suggested that
the paragraph at the end of the document indicate
that this report is subject to review by the
Traffic and Transportation Commission, and that
adequate time must be allotted in order to schedule
an item for the Commission agenda.
Chair/Chavers recommended that it should also be
addressed in the last paragraph on page one.
Motion was made by Chair/Chavers, seconded by
C/Beke and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adopt the
Guidelines, as amended, and send it to the Council
With the caveat that a copy be sent to the
Commission first for review.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke
Fritz, VC/Gravdahl,
NOES:and COMMISSIONERS: NoneChair/Chavers.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ortiz.
ITEMS FROM THE C/Beke recommended that the Commission have a
COMMISSION: second meetin
g to complete discussion
Business items. of Old
Of
Commission concurred to have a seconds meeting the
February 23, 1992.
C/Fritz requested staff to provide the Commission,
on a monthly basis, with a balance sheet indicating
the cost estimates of requested traffic studies.
January 9, 1992 Page 11
ITEMS FROM CE/Mousavi reported that the CalTrans study on the
STAFF: 57/60 interchange will not be completed until June
of 1992. The City has also been working with
CalTrans LACTC to get the HOV lanes going.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Fritz, seconded by C/Beke and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 9:33
p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ SID MOUSAVI
Sid Mousavi
Secretary/Traffic Commission
Attest:
/s/ TODD CHAVERS
Todd Chavers
Chairman
CITY or DxamvmD npm
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 9, 1992
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Whelan called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. at the City Hall 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite
100, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners: Plunk, Vice Chairman Ruzicka, and
Chairman Whelan. Commissioners Meyer and Stitt
were absent (excused).
Also present were Administrative Assistant Kellee
Fritzal and Recreation Supervisor Bob Rose.
MATTERS FROM
Mr. Neubauer stated that the Diamond Bar Historical
THE AUDIENCE:
Association is requesting to work, in conjunction
with the Parks and Recreation Commission, on the
City Anniversary Party.
Chair/Whelan suggested that it may be more
appropriate to tie in the Anniversary Party with
the activities planned for the dedication of the
new Heritage Park building. The item will be
placed on the January 23, 1991 meeting agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar and the Minutes of December 12, 1991.
NEW BUSINESS:
Senior Citizens AA/Fritzal addressed the Commission regarding the
Commission Council's direction to staff, September of 1991, to
determine if there is a need to form a Senior
Citizen Commission. Upon surveying 14 cities, it
has been determined that the majority do not have a
separate Senior Citizen Commission, two have a
Senior Advisory Board that works in conjunction
with the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Human
Services Commission, or the Community Services
Commission. It is recommended that the Commission
discuss this item, and direct staff as necessary.
RS/Rose, in response to Chair/Whelan I s inquiry,
explained that the present senior citizen's group
is structured for only active, lively senior
participation. When a Senior Center is developed,
it tends to also generate a frail and elderly
cliental which needs more assistance.
C/Plunk stated that it is difficult to form a
decision without first knowing what the Seniors
expect from the Commission. It would also be
beneficial to have a statement from staff as to
their opinion of what is needed in the City. She
January 9, 1992 Page 2
suggested that the Seniors be invited to the
Commission meeting for discussion on these issues.
Chair/Whelan, concurring with C/Plunk, stated that
once it is determined what the needs are, the
Commission can then decide whether to appoint some
sort of a liaison.
VC/Ruzicka, concerned with the proliferation of
commissions, suggested that the Commission propose
to the Seniors, that a sub -committee be formed,
consisting of seniors, that would be responsible
for handling a variety of senior issues.
The Commission concurred to direct staff to invite
the Seniors to one of the March Commission
meetings, and to determine the issues that are of
concern to the citizens.
OLD BUSINESS:
General Plan AA/Fritzal reported that the draft General Plan may
go to the Planning Commission, for public hearing,
in March, and concurrently to the Parks and
Recreation Commission. It is recommended that the
Commission postpone discussion on the Resources
Management Element of the draft General Plan until
GPAC reviews and approves the General Plan.
C/Plunk, concerned with the amount of information
that will be given at once, suggested that the
Commission now receive those sections, of the
General Plan, that have been finalized, and
pertains to this Commission.
AA/Fritzal indicated that she will verify the
status of the General Plan and report back to
Chair/Whelan. The first meeting in February can be
dedicated for discussion of the General Plan. The
Commission concurred.
Adopt a Park AA/Fritzal reported that the Adopt -A -Park sub -
Mission committee has developed a mission statement for the
Statement proposed program. Before it is taken to the City
Council, it is suggested that the sub -committee
provide the following information: the parameters
of the program; the reason the Commission is
desirous of the program; the results it will
accomplish; the implementation plan; and the
mission statement. It is recommended that the
Commission review the mission statement and direct
the sub -committee as appropriate.
January 9, 1992 Page 3
Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept the mission
statement.
C/Plunk briefly reviewed the details that will be
included in the report to the Council.
Chair/Whelan stated that the sub -committee will
make a presentation, of the report, to the
Commission at the January 23rd meeting.
Park and AA/Fritzal reported that the scheduled workshop for
Recreation January 21st has been rescheduled to March 24th,
Issues 1992. The Commission's final "White Paper" should
be turned in by February 28, 1992. CM/ Van Nort
requested that all Commissions prioritize projects
and objectives, both short and long term.
The Commission made the following requests: a copy
of the Commission's prioritization list, developed
for the CIP project; a recap of the community
survey; a recap of the parameters suggested by
CM/Van Nort; and a copy of the list of prioritized
projects VC/Ruzicka handed in to staff a while
back.
AA/Fritzal stated that she will mail the various
items requested, to the Commission, as soon as
possible.
Chair/Whelan, in response to C/flunk's inquiry if
the Commission should prioritize the recreation
program classes for the "White Paper", explained
that the purpose is to develop a fee simple
program, look at expanding the programs into
various facilities, and prioritizing that.
However, staff can be requested to do an evaluation
of the recreation program.
AA/Fritzal stated that staff will provide a
complete overview of the recreation program and
place it for discussion on the February agenda.
C/Plunk offered the following suggestions to the
draft "White Paper" submitted by Chair/Whelan:
paragraph 5, page 1, should be restructured to
first indicate that there is a need for more
hiking/biking and nature trails, and then offer
some solutions; the differences between the
suggested Community Recreation Trust Fund and the
Adopt -A -Park Program needs to be clarified or they
will work against one another; and separate those
projects that have a specific site and those that
don't have a site but has a need in the community.
January 9, 1992 Page 4
STAFF COMMENTS: AA/Fritzal addressed the Commission regarding
Resolution 09, from the League of California
Cities, which is a Resolution Relating to Community
Services Month, to be in April. It is recommended
that the item be set aside till March, and suggest
that the City Council formally adopt a resolution
adopting April as the Community Services month.
RS/Rose made the following comments: the Rose
Parade event was successful; registration for the
Winter and Spring session is this Saturday; 65% of
the revenue goal has been collected, by spending
67% of the expenditure goal; and he will present a
report, at the next Commission meeting, presenting
a 6 month review.
Chair/Whelan suggested that staff investigate the
possibility of leasing vacated store fronts, such
as National Lumber, and using it as a recreation
center for our classes.
AA/Fritzal informed the Commission that,
tentatively, the next scoping session for Heritage
Park is scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, January
22nd at the Diamond Bar Library.
C/Plunk requested that RS/Rose include, in his end
of the year report, a comparison of this year's
figures to last year's figures.
Chair/Whelan reported that a citizen, concerned
about the late night noise, complained that the
lights at Ronald Reagan Park are not being shut off
at 9:00 p.m. as was agreed upon. Chair/Whelan
explained that on March 28, 1990, a similar
situation occurred, and the Commission passed a
motion to change Ronald Reagan Park to a 9:00 p.m.
closure as opposed to 10:00 p.m. However, since
presently there are tennis lessons that go on until
9:00 p.m., the citizen has agreed to let the lights
remain on till 9:30 p.m. Chair/Whelan requested
staff to place the item on the January 23rd meeting
agenda, and to inform the citizen of the upcoming
meeting.
VC/Ruzicka suggested that there be some reasonable
compromise made. It is unfair to abridge some of
our young citizen's use to the park, as long as no
violence is occurring.
AA/Fritzal stated that, starting Monday, the
Sheriff Department will patrol the park at 9:00
p.m. and make their recommendation.
January 9, 1992 Page 5
Chair/Whelan inquired if the YMCA has made a
response regarding the track meet.
AA/Fritzal stated that the YMCA was to attend this
meeting to present a proposal requesting to be
allowed to base their summer day camp program at
Sycamore Canyon Park. Within that proposal, they
made some recommendations on items that they could
do for the City in return. The issue will be on the
January 23rd agenda, if the YMCA submits their
proposal.
AA/Fritzal, in response to Chair/Whelan's request
for an update on Don Schad's proposal concerning
the Larkstone/South Point project, stated that the
project is currently being discussed.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
8:48 p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ KELLEE FRITZAL
Kellee Fritzal
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ PAT WHELAN
Pat Whelan
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 23, 1992
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Whelan called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. at the AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Meyer.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Meyer, Plunk, Stitt, Vice Chairman
Ruzicka, and Chairman Whelan.
Also present were Community Development Director
James DeStefano, Administrative Assistant Kellee
Fritzal, Recreation Supervisor Bob Rose, and
Contract Secretary Liz Myers.
MINUTES:
Jan. 9, 1992 Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Minutes of
January 9, 1992. C/Stitt and C/Meyer abstained.
SPECIAL
PRESENTATION:
General Plan CDD/DeStefano addressed the Commission regarding
the Plan For Resource Management. It is an
important component of the City's developing
General Plan, containing two important elements:
Open Space and Conservation.
The Commission inquired of the status of the
General Plan, the time frame involved, and the
Commission's role in the document's process.
CDD/DeStefano briefly reviewed the history of the.
City's process towards developing a General Plan.
It is anticipated that the Parks and Recreation
Commission will review the Resource Management
Element in February of 1992, and that the entire
draft General Plan will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission in March of 1992. The document will
then be brought to the City Council for their
review. He explained that State planning law
requires every City, and County, within the State,
to have a General Plan. The minimum of seven (7)
mandated elements of a General Plan are: Land Use;
Circulation; Housing; Open Space; Conservation;
Safety; and Noise. The State mandates that all of
these elements be internally consistent.
CDD/DeStefano further explained that the issues to
be incorporated within the elements of the Plan for
Resource Management are more an area of policy
rather than specific implementation. He suggested
that the Commission, when reviewing the document,
think about what they would like included, and
January 23, 1992 Page 2
then, as a body, decide what should, or should not,
be made as recommendations. He then referred the
Commission to the two (2) color coded maps
representing the existing land uses within the
community, and the General Plan Advisory
Committee's (GPAC) proposed land use classification
for the community. He explained that the major
land use changes that are going to occur, over the
next 20 years, are going to be the development of
the undeveloped open land.
Chair/Whelan inquired how it is determined what
percentage of the open space should be used for
park lands.
CDD/DeStefano suggested that the Commission may
wish to identify land uses that they would like
seen in the open space areas, and/or to establish a
policy of the overall standard as to how many acres
of active recreation land, per 1,000 people, as
well as the number of acres, per 1,000 people, for
passive recreation land that is achievable within
this community,.
C/Meyer suggested that those recreational
facilities and opportunities that are assessable to
the community should also be explored.
C/Plunk suggested that the figures used to
determine the guidelines should indicate population
based on build out.
CDD/DeStefano, in response to C/Meyer's
observation, stated that staff has also questioned
the provided information that states, "The City
presently has a ratio of 1.1 acre of parkland and
8.8 acres of total recreational land per 1,000
residents.". Staff has requested that the
consultants research that information.
CDD/DeStefano suggested that the Commission
determine what it has today, where it should be in
the future, and essentially how it should get
there, in terms of setting a standard that is
achievable, and, through an implementation measure,
work towards a Master Plan of all of those
recreational uses.
C/Meyer suggested that, during the development
review process, the Commission should have the
opportunity to provide input in determining if the
recreational needs of the community have been
satisfied. An element of the Master Plan should be
January 23, 1992 Page 3
assessing what the Commission feels to be the
City's recreational needs.
C/Plunk, noting that the Commission is in
concurrence of the need for developing a Parks and
Recreation Master Plan, suggested developing a
Needs Assessment as well.
CDD/DeStefano, in response to the Commission's
desire to have input in the Development Review
process, suggested that the Commission could
present a statement to the City Council requesting
to develop a Parks Master Plan, and discuss a
desire to review those elements of the development
process that the Commission wishes to participate
in.
C/Plunk suggested, and C/Meyer concurred, that the
Commission should develop a time line and a
business plan.
AA/Fritzal, in response to Chair/Whelan's concern
that the Commission needs more time to discuss the
land use element, suggested that the Commission
meet at 6:00 p.m., February 13, 1992 for a study
session. The Commission concurred.
C/Plunk requested staff to gather data of other
city's elements, for comparison purposes, to
include some of their policies of preserving open
space, establishing park and recreation standards,
and determining if it is applicable to our
community.
C/Meyer requested staff to gather information from
those communities that have developed a Needs
Assessment.
CDD/DeStefano, in response to VC/Ruzicka's inquiry,
summarized that, on behalf of GPAC and the Planning
Commission, he is seeking an understanding of the
Commission's feelings regarding the goals and
policy statements within the document.
Specifically, he would like to know if they are
consistent with the direction the Commission
believes the City should move forward in, does it
contain all the elements the Commission feels are
important, and, if not, what should be added to it.
It is up to the Commission how the document is to
be reviewed.
Motion was made by C/Plunk, seconded by C/Stitt and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue discussion at 6:00
p.m., February 13, 1992.
January 23, 1992 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS:
Anniversary AA/Fritzal reported that the Diamond Bar
Celebration Improvement Association (DBIA) has agreed to fund
the Third Anniversary Celebration, to be conducted
April 25, 1992 at Sycamore Canyon Park. The event
will be planned by a Committee of DBIA, Historical
Society, staff and a Parks and Recreation
Commissioner. Furthermore, the Historical Society
has agreed to be involved in the Heritage Park
Grand Re -Opening, i.e. display, as was suggested by
the Commission.
VC/Ruzicka informed staff that Mr. Zirbes, the
president of the DBIA, indicated to him that,
although they would enjoy participating in the
anniversary event, the DBIA is not prepared to fund
the celebration. He requested a budget analysis of
the event.
AA/Fritzal explained that funding for the
anniversary event was eliminated by the City
Council due to budget constraints. She stated that
staff was unaware of the information presented by
VC/Ruzicka. The matter will be investigated.
Don Gravdahl, Vice Chairman of the Historical
Society, stated that the Historical Society would
like to be included in the Committee that plans the
Heritage Park Grand Re -Opening. He further
indicated their desire to be able to have a display
at the Third Anniversary Celebration. He suggested
that perhaps the anniversary event could be
celebrated during one of the Concerts in the Parks.
VC/Ruzicka suggested that staff communicate with
the DBIA about the idea presented by Mr. Gravdahl.
The Commission concurred to have the Historical
Society participate in the Heritage Park Re-
opening.
Chair/Whelan requested staff to investigate the
option of celebrating the Anniversary, as an ice-
cream social event, at one of the Concerts in the
Park, perhaps in April. By doing so, further
funding would not be needed.
AA/Fritzal explained that the budget for the
concerts was spent last summer. The new budget
fiscally begins July of 1992. As of now, this
years concerts are proposed to begin the first week
in July. In response to the Commission's inquiry,
January 23, 1992
Page 5
AA/Fritzal indicated that the cost of a concert is
approximately $1,500 dollars.
Chair/Whelan indicated to Mr. Gravdahl that other
options for funding will be investigated for an
ice-cream social Anniversary event. The
information will be available at the next regular
meeting, February 27, 1992.
Chair/Whelan requested a volunteer to be on the
sub -committee with a member from the Historical
Society. At this time, no one volunteered.
AA/Fritzal indicated that, if the Commission so
desires, staff will investigate other options to
organize the anniversary event, and receive further
information from the DBIA, and bring the
information back to the Commission at the February
27th meeting. The Commission concurred.
Ronald Reagan The staff report indicated that the Ordinance of
Park Basketball the City Council supersedes the recommendation of
Lights the Commission to turn the lights off at 9:00 p.m.
at Ronald Reagan Park. The lights will be shut off
at 10:00 p.m., based on the Ordinance.
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's
recommendation.
Chair/Whelan requested staff to notify and inform
the citizen, who made the request, about the
Ordinance.
Add'1 Parking AA/Fritzal addressed the Commission regarding the
at Peterson Park request made by Councilman Forbing for an estimate
to construct additional parking at Peterson Park.
It is staff's recommendation that additional
parking not be provided due to the already limited
supply of parkland.
Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Meyer
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept staff's
recommendation.
Mid -Year RS/Rose reviewed the six month report on Diamond
Recreation Bar's Recreation Services. He indicated that he
Review will be submitting, shortly, a report on next
year's program.
C/Plunk requested that information on the cost per
participant be provided in the near future.
January 23, 1992 Page 6
Recreational RS/Rose reviewed the report on the Recreational
Programming/ Programming/Census Information. As requested, the
Census Info. Recreation staff has reviewed the programming
offered to the Diamond Bar community to determine
it's responsiveness to the stated needs and desires
of the community.
Mission Profile VC/Ruzicka submitted to staff and the Commission a
& Priority List copy of his proposed Parks and Recreation
Commission's Mission Profile and Priorities List.
He reiterated the need to establish a Master Parks
Plan, focusing on priorities both long and short
term. The proposal focused on the following
categories: administration; budget; acquisitions;
capital improvements; retrofitting; programming;
sub -committees; and policy. The purpose of the
proposal is to focus on high priority items,
summarize the Commission's accomplishments, and
indicate future plans. The Commission would be
able to make any changes, adjustments, or additions
as needed.
C/Plunk stated that the proposal is more of a
calendar in priorities list, than a mission
profile. It should probably be reviewed quarterly
by the Commission, and semi annually, to be
presented by the Chairperson. She made the
following suggestions: change "retrofitting" to
"maintenance"; divide the capital improvements to
separate major and minor projects; change
"acquisitions" to "land acquisitions"; and include
the JPA and the individual contracts. She
indicated that she had envisioned the "White Paper"
to be more like this proposal.
C/Plunk requested that the Mission Profile and
Priorities List be worked into the "White Paper."
OLD BUSINESS:
Park and Chair/Whelan explained that there has not been any
Recreation changes made to the draft "White Paper" as of yet.
Issues
C/Plunk suggested that the "White Paper" be written
in bullet form. In regards to the CIP, she
suggested that it should be a staff function to
develop the Mission Profile and Priorities List.
Also, items concerning general philosophy should be
calendared for discussion at a future date.
C/Stitt stated that the community swimming pool
should be included in the CIP list.
January 23, 1992
Page 7
C/Plunk requested staff to list which items on the
CIP have been completed. She requested the
following items to be included in the CIP list:
signage indicating "Reservation Area"; benches; and
a list of areas of acquisition, or improvements of
park.
C/Ruzicka suggested, and C/Meyer concurred, that
the results from the Park and Recreation Survey
should not be heavily relied upon.
Proposed AA/Fritzal reported that the Parks and Recreation
Adopt -A -Park sub -committee met and developed the Adopt -A -Park
Program program, including all aspects of the proposed
program, as is indicated in the staff report. The
program results are intangible at this point. If
the Commission agrees to the proposal, then it will
be forwarded to the Council at a future date.
AA/Fritzal, in response to C/Plunk's concern,
stated that the proposed Adopt -A -Park program would
be to augment the existing maintenance budget and
not to replace it.
Chair/Whelan inquired if the proposal contains all
the necessary information that would be desired by
the Council.
AA/Fritzal stated that a fiscal impact report,
which will be prepared by staff, and the matrix
information previously reviewed by the Commission,
would be included within the parameters.
C/Meyer suggested that the proposal go before
Council along with the "White Paper".
C/Plunk inquired if the Council would be able to
discuss the proposal, and act upon it, if it is
included in with the "White Paper".
CDD/DeStefano indicated that, with respect to the
Planning Commission's understanding, the study
session is an opportunity to present a variety of
concepts and ideas to the City Council. The City
Council would incorporate those ideas back into the
new charge for the new Commission for the ensuing
year.
C/Stitt, referring to some of the listed capital
improvement projects, inquired if the City would
incur liability if a service group buys equipment
from the City and an injury occurs due to a defect
in that equipment.
January 23, 1992
Page 8
AA/Fritzal stated that service groups, desiring
equipment, would finance the money to the City, the
City would purchase the equipment, still incurring
the liability, but insuring it's proper
installation.
The Commission concurred to include the Adopt -A -
Park program with the "White Paper".
ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Plunk requested that future Commission meetings
be calendared and published on a consistent basis.
C/Stitt volunteered to be on the sub -committee to
assist the DBIA and the Historical Society with the
Anniversary Celebration if the financing situation
is straightened out.
VC/Ruzicka requested staff to determine if Peterson
Park could be used for the softball tournament
scheduled July 27 - August 1, 1992. He inquired if
staff had any information regarding the rumor that
Orange County is contemplating in buying the
Firestone Boy Scout reservation.
CDD/DeStefano stated that he had not heard anything
along that line.
VC/Ruzicka inquired about the possible development
of the property between Pathfinder on Brea Canyon,
which would include Sandstone Canyon.
CDD/DeStefano explained that the land is zoned for
single family homes, and there is a development
interest for about 100 homes. It is anticipated
that staff will receive a specific development
proposal within the next few months. It would
undoubtedly require a full EIR to assess all the
issues.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
9:45 p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ KELLEE FRITZAL
Kellee Fritzal
Secretary
Attest:
/s/ PAT WHELAN
Pat Whelan
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 27, 1992
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Grothe called the meeting to order at 7:05
p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management
District Board Meeting Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Mr. Al Rumpilla.
ROLL CALL: Commissioner Harmony, Commissioner Flamenbaum,
Commissioner Schey, Vice Chairman MacBride, and
Chairman Grothe.
CD/DeStefano, in response to.0/Flamenbaum, stated
that the applicant has resubmitted a new project
with the following changes: contains less dwelling
units; replaces the three story building, that was
adjacent to the single family homes to the north,
with a two story building; changes the entire
project to be Senior Citizen oriented; is
requesting a zone change to eliminate the
commercial zoning, and rezone to a more appropriate
residential zone; and reduces parking in accordance
to the senior citizen parking standards.
C/Schey inquired if the zone change would eliminate
the need for a Development Agreement.
CD/DeStefano explained that the Development
Agreement remains a necessary tool because of the
heighth issue involved, in that particular zone, as
Also present were Community Director James
DeStefano, Associate Planner Robert Searcy,
Planning Technician Ann Lungu, and Contract
Secretary Liz Myers.
MATTERS FROM
Mr. Tom Ortiz, residing at 3308 Hawkwood, a member
THE AUDIENCE:
of the Traffic and Transportation Commission (TTC),
thanked the Commission for their efforts in
providing the TTC with information regarding
Planning meetings.
MINIITES:
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by
C/Schey and CARRIED to approve the Minutes of
Jan. 13, 1992
January 13, 1992. VC/MacBride abstained.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
CD/DeStefano reported that this item was an
advertized public hearing in anticipation of a
TT Map No. 50519/
revised project, to be received from Dr. Crowley,
DR No. 91-2/
regarding the 80 unit Senior Citizen project
DA No. 91-2/
located along Torrito Lane. However, at the last
Zone Change 91-1
Planning meeting, the Commission decided to
postpone any action on this project until such time
that a Cost/Benefit analysis was completed.
Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the
Commission take no action at this time.
CD/DeStefano, in response to.0/Flamenbaum, stated
that the applicant has resubmitted a new project
with the following changes: contains less dwelling
units; replaces the three story building, that was
adjacent to the single family homes to the north,
with a two story building; changes the entire
project to be Senior Citizen oriented; is
requesting a zone change to eliminate the
commercial zoning, and rezone to a more appropriate
residential zone; and reduces parking in accordance
to the senior citizen parking standards.
C/Schey inquired if the zone change would eliminate
the need for a Development Agreement.
CD/DeStefano explained that the Development
Agreement remains a necessary tool because of the
heighth issue involved, in that particular zone, as
January 27, 1992
Page 2
well as the contractual relationships and
obligations that the City is interested in to
secure the senior citizen amenities, and the
project amenities.
VC/MacBride, in response to C/Harmony's inquiry as
to why a Cost/Benefit analysis was requested,
explained that he wanted further information that
considered the difference in the benefits, to the
City in terms of revenue, in retaining a commercial
aspect as opposed to residential aspects.
C/Harmony indicated that he is not opposed to the
request of a Cost/Benefit analysis, but rather
surprised by the developer's audaciousness to
change the project - that rather than responding to
the Commission's concerns for high density on the
project, the developer changed it to a Senior
Citizens complex - cut a few units and reduced
parking, and still had not addressed the
Commission's stated concerns.
The Public Hearing was declared opened.
Don Gravdahl, residing at 23988 Minnequa, inquired
if the project is going to be a condominium, or a
low income rental senior citizen project. Noting
that a senior citizen complex can receive a density
bonus, he expressed his concern with the
availability of parking.
CD/DeStefano explained that the Commission has not
yet seen any of the proposed changes. To staff's
understanding, the project still remains a market
rate condominium project, with the only difference
being that the applicant is proposing that it be
marketed and available exclusively for senior
citizens. Staff has not had the opportunity to
analyze the issues involved. At this point, the
applicant is requesting zoning and density
consistent with the zone he is now applying for,
and not a density bonus.
Red Calkins, residing at 240 Eagle Nest Dr., stated
his concern that the project will generate an
increase in trash and water consumption, at the
time when we should be conserving. He noted that
the Senior Citizen complex on north Diamond Bar
Blvd. continuously has vacant units.
Chair/Grothe requested staff to be prepared to have
information regarding the State law density bonus.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
January 27, 1992
Page 3
C/Flamenbaum requested that staff provide the
Commission with the project's blue print plans well
in advance of the next public hearing.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
C/Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the
matter.
INFORMATIONAL CD/DeStefano reported that, pursuant to the
ITEMS: Commission's direction at the last meeting, staff
is distributing Planning Commission agendas to the
TTC and the Parks and Recreation Commission. It is
anticipated that there will be reciprocal responses
from those Commission's staff. The agendas will
either be included in the Planning Commission's
packet, or be mailed, depending upon the timing of
each Commission's meetings.
CD/DeStefano suggested that the Commission choose
to develop a consensus "White Paper" for the City
Council's consideration, as oppose to the
Commission's earlier decision to prepare one
independently.
C/Schey stated that he had suggested to staff that
it may be more appropriate to respond in an
organized fashion. Since the deadline to submit
the "White Paper" is in March, and, by then, we may
be a Commission with a different make-up whose
members are not familiar with the issues and
concerns to be presented, he suggested that the
"White Paper" be completed before that date.
CD/DeStefano explained that the purpose of the
"White Paper" is an opportunity for the Commission
to address any issues, concerning the Planning
Commission and/or the City, and to present those
issues for thought to the City Council at the study
session.
Chair/Grothe and C/Schey discussed examples of some
of the issues that could be outlined in the "White
Paper". The "White Paper" could also include a
philosophical approach on what type of community we
envision ourselves to be, or to become.
C/Schey suggested, and the Commission concurred,
that a sub -committee should be appointed to
formulate the "White Paper". C/Schey and
C/Flamenbaum volunteered to be on the sub-
committee. Each Commissioner should outline their
individual ideas and submit them, through staff, by
Friday of this week. The matter is to be placed on
next meeting's agenda.
January 27, 1992
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Page 4
Chair/Grothe, in regards to the proposed Goodyear
project, presented a photo of a similar project for
the purpose of demonstrating it could be made more
aesthetically acceptable to the community.
CD/DeStefano informed the Commission that the
Planners Institute will be held in the second week
of April of 1992, in San Diego.
Chair/Grothe suggested that the reservations be
obtained early, and that staff insures that they
are in close proximity to the meeting.
C/Schey noted that the "gorilla" at the Honda car
dealership is back.
Chair/Grothe stated that the Sign Ordinance should
either be enforced, or further revised to exempt,
or to adjust, to car dealerships.
C/Flamenbaum inquired if there is a way to mandate
against businesses, that go bankrupt, from boarding
up their windows.
CD/DeStefano indicated that staff will explore the
options available and get back to the Commission.
C/Harmony stated that he has received various
complaints regarding the events held by the Maple
Hills Club. He explained that the Hills Club is
located in an R-1 zone, has approximately 3,000
members, and has many social events that have
become a disturbance to the surrounding residential
neighborhood. He requested staff to investigate
the matter, and see if it can be dealt with on a
code enforcement basis.
C/Harmony addressed the Commission regarding his
concern that the Planning Commission has not set up
definitive guidelines for Architectural Review. He
specifically referred to the recent criticism, from
the general public, and the City Council, over
Diamond Brother's Apartment complex on Grand
Avenue, and recommended that the Commission
authorize staff to put together guidelines and
standard for architectural review. He suggested
that the Commission appoint a sub -committee of
architects, a landscape architects, and other
professional trades to review, on a volunteer
basis, all development plans and to report back to
the Commission. He requested the subject of
architectural review be placed on the next agenda.
January 27, 1992 Page 5
CD/DeStefano suggested that staff first provide the
Commission with a review of the last draft of the
design guidelines. If there is further desire,
staff will then forward the recommendation to the
City Council. The matter will be placed on the,
next agenda as an informational item. The
Commission concurred.
Chair/Grothe requested staff to provide the
Commission with a calendar of upcoming projects.
C/Schey suggested that staff modify the "Matters
From the Audience" portion of the agenda to
indicate that the general public may also address
any items on the agenda, but not a public hearing.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
C/Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the
meeting at 8:32 p.m.
Respectively,
Jam DeStefano
Secretary/Planning Commission
Attest:
Jack Grothe
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 5X I
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 19, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Exoneration of Bond for grading at 1300-1360 Valley Vista Drive on Tract Number 39679
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to exonerate a $7,770 surety bond posted by Safeco Insurance
Company of America for grading of Tract Number 39679. On October 26, 1990, the grading for office
buildings #147 was finalized by the Department of Public Works.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and accept grading of 1300-1360
Valley Vista Drive and exonerate the grading surety bond posted in an amount of $7,770. Further, it is
recommended that the City Clerk notify Safeco Insurance Company of America and the Koll Company of the
City Council's action.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission? N/A
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
Sid J. Mousavi
Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Exoneration of Grading Bond for 1300-1360 Valley Vista Drive
on Tract Number 39679
ISSUE STATEMENT
This report requests the exoneration of a grading surety bond posted for
1300-1360 Valley Vista Drive located on Tract Number 39679.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of the bond
posted for grading on Tract Number 39679 in an amount of $7,770. Further, it
is recommended that the City Clerk notify Safeco Insurance Company of America
and the Koll Company of the City Council's action.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
This action has no impact on the City's 1991-92 budget.
BACKGROUND
The seven commercial buildings constructed by the Koll Company in 1989 were
finaled by the Building Department in October 1990. These offices are on the
westside of the Gateway Center Drive, between Valley Vista Drive and Bridge
Gate Drive and are accessed only by one driveway located off of Valley Vista
Drive. On October 26, 1990, the grading for office buildings #1-#7 was
finalized by the Department of Public Works. The bond was originally posted
with Los Angeles County and as a result, it took a number of months to
research the paperwork from the numerous files sent to the City by the County
upon incorporation.
DISCUSSION
The following listed surety bond needs to be exonerated:
Tract No.: 39679
Bond Number: 5558083
Principal: PK Diamond Bar Venture No. 1, L.P.
Surety: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Amount: $7,770
PREPARED BY:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 5.z . 2._ -
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 19, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Exoneration of Bond for grading at 2569 Wagon Train
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to exonerate a $1,260 surety bond posted for grading at 2569
Wagon Train, a single family residence.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and accept grading construction at
2569 Wagon Train and exonerate the grading surety bond posted in an amount of $1,260. Further, it is
recommended that the City Clerk notify Coast Federal Bank and the developer, Frank Piermarini, Inc. of the
City Council's action.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission? N/A
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
RE WED B
;y
Obert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger Si ousavi
City Manager Assistant City Manager Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Surety Bond Exoneration
ISSUE STATEMENT
This report requests the exoneration of a surety bond for work located on
2569 Wagon Train in Diamond Bar, California.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of the
grading bond posted with the City of Diamond Bar for grading at said location
and instruct the City Clerk to notify Coast Federal Bank and Frank
Piermarini, Inc. of the City Council's action,
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
This item has no financial impact on the City's 1991-92 Fiscal Year budget.
BACKGROUND
The grading work at 2569 Wagon Train for a single family residence has been
completed and approved by the City of Diamond Bar Department of Public Works.
The grading permit was issued in May 1991. The grading quantities involved
350 cubic yard fill. Rough grading was certified in May and the building
permit was then issued. Final grading was certified in January 1992.
DISCUSSION
The grading -work at 2569 Wagon Train was accepted by the City of Diamond Bar
Department of Public Works on January 8, 1992. The City Engineer recommends
that the following surety bond be exonerated:
Owner:
Address:
Surety Company:
Amount:
Bond Number:
PREPARED BY:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
Frank Piermarini
2569 Wagon Train
Coast Federal Bank
$1,260
ACC #114-61966-1
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
1 v: xooert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 24, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Exoneration of Bond for grading at 2715 Shadow Canyon Drive, Tract Number 30289
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar desires to exonerate a $20,000 surety bond posted for grading at 2715
Shadow Canyon Drive, a single family residence.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and accept grading construction at
2715 Shadow Canyon Drive and exonerate the grading surety bond posted in an amount of $20,000. Further,
it is recommended that the City Clerk notify First International Bank and the developer, Rocco Patetta, Inc.
of the City Council's action.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
— Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? Yes X No
Which Commission? N/A
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
r� rr Mli is x
obert L. Van NN—ort Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Sid J. Mousavi
Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Surety Bond Exoneration
ISSUE STATEMENT
This report requests the exoneration of a surety bond for work located on
2715 Shadow Canyon Drive in Diamond Bar, California.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the exoneration of the
grading bond posted with the City of Diamond Bar for grading at said location
and instruct the City Clerk to notify First International Bank and Rocco
Patetta, of the City Council's action,
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
This item has no financial impact on the City's 1991-92 Fiscal Year budget.
BACKGROUND
The grading permit was issued by Los Angeles County in September 1989. The
grading quantities involved 4,400 cubic yard cut and 7,300 cubic yard fill.
The building permit was issued in December 1990 and the final grading was
approved by the City of Diamond Bar Department of Public Works on February
20, 1992. As a result, the City desires to release the grading bond for said
location.
DISCUSSION
The grading work at 2715 Shadow Canyon Drive was accepted by the City of
Diamond Bar Department of Public Works on January 8, 1992. The City Engineer
recommends that the following surety bond be exonerated:
Owner: Rocco Patetta
Address: 2715 Shadow Canyon Drive, Tract Number 30289
Surety Company: First Interstate Bank
Amount: $20,000
Bond Number: 33270
PREPARED BY:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 24, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Design of double left -turn lanes on Grand Avenue at Golden Springs Drive
SUMMARY: During the February 13, 1992 Traffic and Transportation Commission meeting, various
alternatives to modify and improve the intersection of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive were discussed.
This intersection is currently accommodating large volume of traffic due to the Grand Avenue opening to the
City of Chino Hills, City of Industry, and occupation of the AQMD facilities. With the improvements of
second left -turn lanes to the north and southbound approaches on Grand Avenue, the level of service at said
intersection will be improved.
RECOMMENDATION: The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends that the City Council
authorize staff to develop plans to include second left -turn lanes on north and southbound approach lanes of
Grand Avenue at Golden Springs Drive.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
— Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed _ Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No
Which Commission? Traffic and Transportation Commission
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
Ij�VIE 1�
BY•
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
Sid J. Mousavi
Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Design of double left -turn lanes on Grand Avenue at Golden
Springs Drive
ISSUE STATEMENT
The City of Diamond Bar desires to modify and improve the intersection of
Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive to accommodate increasing traffic
volume at said intersection.
RECOMMENDATION
The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends that the City Council
approve the modification of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive
intersection by developing plans to include second left -turn lanes on north
and southbound approach lanes of Grand Avenue at Golden S rin s D
L_ g J.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The preliminary engineer's estimate for design and installation of these
improvements is $15,000. Developer's fees are proposed to be utilized to
finance the costs.
BACKGROUND
Grand Avenue is a four -lane primary arterial with a 13 -foot median and a
curb -to -curb width of 84 feet throughout its length. It originates at the
State Route 57/60 interchange, at the boundary with the City of Industry,
where the roadway recently was connected to the detached section of Grand
Avenue in the City of Walnut. Due to the opening of Grand Avenue into the
development areas of the City of Chino Hills and its recent opening to the
City of Walnut, the traffic volumes are still increasing as drivers change
their travel patterns. As a result, after completing the installation of new
traffic signals, the Traffic and Transportation Commission has been studying
existing signals and intersections in order to provide an effective and safe
traffic circulation on Grand Avenue. Among these intersections, staff and
the Traffic and Transportation Commission has been investigating the
intersection of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive.
DISCUSSION
The modification of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive was discussed
before the Traffic and Transportation Commission on January 8, 1992 and
February 13, 1992. Staff presented the Commission with various alternatives
to improve said intersection. Briefly, the four alternatives which were
provided were as follows:
Page Two
Grand/Golden Springs Drive
February 25, 1992
1. Add a second left -turn lane to the north and south approaches on Grand
Avenue and add an exclusive northbound right -turn lane on Grand Avenue
at Golden Springs Drive.
2. Add an exclusive northbound right -turn lane on Grand Avenue at Golden
Springs Drive
3. Add a second left -turn lane to the east approach on Golden Springs Drive
at Grand Avenue.
4. Add an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane on Golden Springs Drive, off
of Grand Avenue.
After discussion of the above alternatives, the Traffic and Transportation
Commission concurred with staff to entertain the modified alternative that
suggested the development of plans for second left -turn lanes on the north
and south approaches of Grand Avenue.
The scope of the work will include installation of new detector loops for the
traffic signal, restriping and realignment of the lanes, signage and other
incidental works.
PREPARED BY:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. 5 , /0
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 19, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Golden Springs Drive from Brea Canyon Road to Grand Avenue.
SUMMARY: Golden Springs Drive, between Brea Canyon Road and Grand Avenue, is in need of pavement
rehabilitation and/or reconstruction. The existing pavement for Golden Springs Drive must be analyzed and
evaluated in order to determine the most practical and economical approach for the roadway improvements.
Based on the findings of the pavement evaluation, plans and specifications for the subject project will be
designed accordingly. Staff has received and evaluated seven (7) proposals for the design and construction
administrative services of subject project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar award a design
and inspection services contract to Dwight French & Associates in the amount not to exceed $52,830.00.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
X Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
_ Yes X No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
_ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
Robert L. Van
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
Sid J. Mousavi
City Engineer/Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Golden Springs
Drive from Brea Canyon Road to Grand Avenue
ISSUE STATEMENT
The City desires to reconstruct/rehabilitate Golden Springs Drive
between Brea Canyon Road and Grand Avenue. To accomplish said
contemplated improvements, it is necessary to secure the services
of a qualified civil engineering firm to provide pavement analysis,
design and construction administration services.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council award a design and
construction administration services contract to Dwight French and
Associates for the reconstruction/rehabilitation of Golden Springs
Drive in the amount of $52,830 and authorize the City Manager to
execute amendments to the agreement up to $10,000.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The Engineer's estimate for pavement analysis, design and
construction management was $50,000. Dwight French and Associates
has proposed a not -to -exceed fee of $52,830.00 for these services.
The proposed fee is 10.6% of the total allocated project budget of
$500,000.00. Said budget consists of $200,000 Gas Tax Funds and
$300,000 Developer's Fees.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Golden Springs Drive, between Brea Canyon Road and Grand Avenue, is
in need of pavement rehabilitation and/or reconstruction. To
determine the most practical and economical approach for restoring
the street to full function, the existing pavement on Golden
Springs Drive must be tested, analyzed and evaluated prior to any
pavement design work. It is anticipated that the varied conditions
of the existing roadway paving will result in different
reconstruction/rehabilitation treatments for different pavement
areas.
Page Two
Golden Springs Drive
February 19, 1992
In August of 1991, staff initiated a verbal request for proposal to
procure a civil engineering firm for the pavement analysis, design
and construction administration services of subject project. In
response to the verbal request, a total of seven (7) engineering
services proposals were submitted for evaluation. Those firms are
as follows:
1. Dwight French and Associates
2. DKA Consultants, Inc.
3. Sam W. Peterson and Associates, Inc.
4. Boyle Engineering Corporation
5. UMA Engineering, Inc.
6. RKA Civil Engineers Inc.
7. Civil Trans Inc.
A panel consisting of three (3) staff members, Terrence L.
Belanger, Sid J. Mousavi, and David G. Liu, and one (1) Traffic and
Transportation Commissioner, Don Gravdahl, reviewed the proposals
and conducted interviews with each consultant on January 30, 1992.
Evaluation based on demonstrated track record, adequate number of
staff assigned to the job, experience of team members, ability to
work with City staff, knowledge of local conditions, involvement
with related projects, ability to keep on schedule, ability to stay
within budget, subconsultant for the pavement analysis, and
demonstrated interest by the consultant were utilized.
Prepared By:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 1992, between the City of Diamond Bar, a
Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and
Dwight French and Associates (hereinafter referred to as
"CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals.
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its' Request for Proposal
pertaining to the performance of professional engineering services
with respect to the Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Golden Springs
Drive from Brea Canyon Road to Grand Avenue ("Project" hereafter).
(ii) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the
performance of such services, a full, true and correct of which
proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference
made a part hereof.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform
professional engineering services necessary to render advice and
assistance to CITY, CITY's City Council and staff in the
preparation of Project.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to
perform such services and is willing to perform such professional
engineering services as hereinafter defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and
CONSULTANT as follows:
B. Agreement.
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply
to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement
otherwise requires:
(a) Proiect: The preparation of described in
Exhibit "A" hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation
of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both
oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and
documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work
sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with
respect to the Project.
(b) Services: Such professional engineering
services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to
complete the Project.
(c) Completion of Project: The date of completion
of all phases of the Project, including any and all procedures,
development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical
reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT
at public hearings will be determined by the CITY.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows•
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and
complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" hereto and all
in accordance with Federal, State and CITY statues, regulations,
ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of
CITY and in accordance to the standard of care normally provided by
practitioners of the engineering profession.
(b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps,
surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical
documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time
specified by the CITY. Copies of the documents shall be in such
numbers as are required by Exhibit "A". CITY may thereafter review
and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and
CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents
as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in
such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The
time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2. (b) may be
extended upon written approval of CITY.
(c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and
expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion
of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this
Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by
CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be
fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT
further agrees that no subconsultant shall be retained by
CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $52,830.00
for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum
shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and
indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees,
consultants and subconsultants to CONSULTANT. Payment to
CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule
set forth below.
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in
accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly
basis, and such invoices shall be paid within thirty (30) days of
receipt of CONSULTANT invoices. The CONSULTANT shall detail the
charges by project task number, hours worked, and employee
classifications, total not to exceed amount for the project if it
is a time -and -material basis project, and percent completed if it
is a lump sum basis project. All charges shall be in accordance
with CONSULTANT's proposal either with respect to hourly rates or
lump sum amounts for individual tasks.
(c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY
be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 90% of the
maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final
documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as
described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final
payment shall be made not later than sixty (60) days after
presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY.
(d) Additional services: Payments for additional
services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in
CONSULTANT's proposal as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be
paid on a reimbursement basis. Charges for additional services
shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY
within thirty (30) days after said invoices are received by CITY.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in
Exhibit "A" hereto.
(b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps
and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers
necessary in order to complete the Project.
(c) Such information as is generally available from
CITY files applicable to the Project.
(d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining
information from other governmental agencies and/or private
parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make
all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such
information.
5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports
prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be
considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services
performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified
materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT
may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and
materials as CONSULTANT may desire. CONSULTANT shall not be held
liable for use of such documents by CITY for purposes other than
intended by the Agreement.
6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by
CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to
CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of
termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement
is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's
applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "A", on a pro -rata
basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of
the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT
receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above.
CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports,
whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the
date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement
except for cause.
7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all
notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the
parties hereto -shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7.
The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons
primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this
Agreement:
CITY: Sid Jalal Mousavi
City Engineer/Public Works Director
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
CONSULTANT: John C. Whitman
Dwight French and Associates
1470 S. Valley Vista Drive, Suite 225
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by
mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee
forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States
mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work
under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required
hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall
CONSULTANT allow any subconsultant to commence work on a
subcontract until all insurance required of the subconsultant has
been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all time
during the term of this Agreement the following policies of
insurance:
(a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before
beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of
insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation
insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through
subconsultants in carrying out the work specified herein, in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of
compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing
work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of
Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against
liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance
in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply
with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work
of this Agreement"
(b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout
the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense,
CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and
effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT,
comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile
insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury,
death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities,
providing protection of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000.000.00) for property damage, bodily injury or death to any
one person or for any one accident or occurrence and One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00) aggregate.
(c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take
out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a
policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions
("malpractice") providing protection of at least one Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per claim and in the aggregate for errors
and omissions ("malpractice") with respect to loss arising from
actions of CONSULTANT performing the Project hereunder on behalf of
CITY.
(d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance
required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried
only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in
the State of California and policies required under paragraphs
8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insured CITY, its' elected
officials, officers, employees, agents and representatives. All
policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable that:
(1) the insurer, except the errors and omissions insurer, waives
the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials,
officers, employees, agents and representatives; (2) the policies
are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be
carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be canceled or materially
changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to
CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies
of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate
evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own
account insurance not required under this Agreement.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify
and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials,
officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss,
damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by
CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any
manner arising out of the negligent, intentional and/or willful
acts and/or omissions of CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement,
including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the
maximum extent permitted by law.
10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of
any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made,
either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written
consent of CITY.
11. Damages: In the event that CONSULTANT fails to
submit to CITY the completed project, together with all documents
and supplemental material required hereunder, in public hearing
form to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY, within the time set
forth herein, or as may be extended by written consent of the
parties hereto, CONSULTANT shall pay to CITY, as liquidated damages
and not as a penalty, the sum of Two Hundred dollars ($200.00) per
day for each day CONSULTANT is in default, which sum represents a
reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto to estimate a fair
compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result from such
a default in performance by CONSULTANT, and due to the difficulty
which would otherwise occur in establishing actual damages
resulting from such default, unless said default is caused by CITY
or by acts of God, acts of the public enemy, fire, floods,
epidemics, or quarantine restrictions.
12. Independent Consultant: The parties hereto agree
that CONSULTANT and its' employees, officers and agents are
independent consultants under this Agreement and shall not be
construed for any purpose to be employees of City.
13. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.
14. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding
is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement,
the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to
recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an
amount determined by the court to be reasonable.
15. Mediation: Any dispute or controversy arising under
this Agreement, or in connection with any of the terms and
conditions hereof, shall be referred by the parties hereto for
mediation. A third party, neutral mediation service shall be
selected, as agreed upon by the parties and the costs and expenses
thereof shall be borne equally by the parties hereto. In the event
the parties are unable to mutually agree upon the mediator to be
selected hereunder, the City Council shall select such a neutral,
third party mediation service and the City Council's decision shall
be final. The parties agree to utilize their good faith efforts to
resolve any such dispute or controversy so submitted to mediation.
It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties hereto that
referral of any such dispute or controversy, and mutual good faith
efforts to resolve the same thereby, shall be conditions precedent
to the institution of any action or proceeding, whether at law or
in equity with respect to any such dispute or controversy.
16. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and
all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the
parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to
this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party
which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or
promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding.
Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is
in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above:
CONSULTANT:
DWIGHT FRENCH AND ASSOCIATES
Name and Title
Approved As To Form:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
City Attorney
City Manager
February 21, 1992
Mr. Sid J. Mousavi
City Engineer/Public Works Director
21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 ►fir"-,
. ,., c i m
rn CO m
�
Subject: Proposal to prepare plans and specifications, investigate concWonW o
recommend rehabilitation, and overlaying 1.4 miles of Golden Springs'Dri o
along with construction management.
Dear Mr. Mousavi:
CO
As pointed out to us by David Liu of your staff, we have a mathematical error in the price
in our proposal dated February 7, 1992. Each task was correct however, the addition
was in error. Attached is the corrected Project Budget by Task. The price should be
$52,830.00.
Please use that number in your deliberation. I apologize for the error.
Sincerely,
Joh C. t
Cian
Pre dent
JCW:cvm
prop\b264b.jcw
Enclosures
1470 So. Valley Vista Dr., Suite 225, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 a
a (714) 860-3566 Fax No. (714) 860-3476
■ Apple Valley (619) 240-3336 e
TASK 1
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TASK 5
TASK 6
TASK 7
TASK 8
TASK 9
TASK 10
TASK 11
TASK 12
PROJECT BUDGET BY TASK
TOTAL
DWIGHT
&F NCH
nssocm a
$200
$150
$500
$3,100
$2,800
$800
$2,825
$400
$1,200
$18,015
$1,300
$21,540
$52,830
PROPOSAL
to
THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
for
REHABILITATION OF
GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
from
GRAND AVENUE
to
BREA CANYON ROAD
by
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
with
LABELLE • MARVIN
FEBRUARY 7. 1992
DWIGHT FRENCH AND ASSOCIATES • ENGINEERS • DIAMOND BAR
February 7, 1992
Mr. Sid J. Mousavi
City Engineer/Public Works Director
21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
Subject: Proposal to prepare plans and specifications, investigate conditions,
recommend rehabilitation, and overlaying 1.4 miles of Golden Springs Drive
along with construction management.
Dear Mr. Mousavi:
Dwight French and Associates (DFA) is pleased to present this revised proposal for the
subject project. The proposal is based on your instructions at the interview on January
30, 1992.
DFA is fully capable of undertaking this project because:
We have senior engineers who are very familiar with the proposed project,
We have practical experience in evaluating, rating and recommending
rehabilitation strategies for streets, as well as construction management
activities.
• All of our work will be performed onsite and in our office, which is just down
the street from your offices.
Among our many similar engagements, we have recently completed the design of over
2 miles of overlay on Mission Boulevard in Ontario; widening and overlay of 2 miles of
Navajo Road in Apple Valley; and curb and gutter and overlay of approximately 1 mile of
Los Angeles Avenue in Moorpark. Our understanding is that the City desires to consider
both rubberized asphalt and recycling the existing asphalt. We are familiar with both of
these approaches.
Our cost estimate for performing all the work listed under our Scope of Work is-$54,Bw.
$ sa' 83-�.
OE.e
1470 So. Valley Vista Dr., Suite 225, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ■
■ (714) 860-3566 Fax No. (714) 860-3476 ■
r APPle Valley (619) 240-3336 ■
This proposal includes:
• Experience of the firm
• Experience of Project Staff
• Scope of Work
• Schedule
• Budget
If you have questions or would like to discuss this proposal, please do not hesitate to
telephone me at (714) 860-3566.
Ancerely,
hn C. Whitman
resident
JCW:drb
prop\b264a.jcw
Attachments
DWIGHT
:3939
EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM
Dwight French & Associates, Inc. (DFA) has been providing professional engineering
services since its founding in 1979. The firm, headquartered in Diamond Bar, is in the
same office complex as City Hall. This location allows us to work closely with City staff
and helps us to respond to time critical issues.
DFA's philosophy is to provide the client with a professionally engineered product within
schedule and budget and to be responsive to the changing needs of our clients. We
know that when we do that and provide a good working environment for our people, with
modern equipment and top notch compensation and benefits, we will make a fair profit.
The firm maintains a staff of 20 professionals, including 6 registered civil engineers who
have experience managing and designing major public works projects throughout
southern California as well as the rest of the United States. Many of DFA's professionals
have both public agency as well as private consulting engineering experience -- ensuring
that the firm is sensitive to concerns on both sides of the table. Our management
philosophy encourages our professionals to advance their education by obtaining higher
education degrees and attending seminars to keep their technical skills honed.
The firm provides the most modern tools for our staff. All engineers and designers have
personal computers at their desks. DFA's equipment is tied together in a LAN and
supported with the latest management and technical software. CADD is also available to
each engineer and designer. In fact, DFA has 12 CADD work stations.
DFA has extensive experience in assessing, designing and providing construction
management for street overlay projects.
Recent street overlay projects which DFA has successfully completed within the past 2
years include:
• Mission Boulevard, Ontario - 2 miles - asphalt overlay;
• Navajo Road, Apple Valley - 2 miles - widening and asphalt overlay;
• Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark - 1 mile - asphalt overlay;
• High Street, Moorpark - 1 mile - asphalt overlay;
• Charles Street, Moorpark - 1 mile - asphalt overlay;
• San Antonio Avenue, Chino - 5 miles - widening and asphalt overlay; and
• Apple Valley Road, Apple Valley - 2 miles - currently designing a staged
construction project consisting of widening and asphalt overlay.
DWIGHT
NC
Assoc A79
In addition, DFA has extensive experience in pavement evaluation. the firm recently
completed the evaluation of over 300 miles of pavement in Apple Valley. Other project
staff have evaluated pavements throughout the United States, including Virginia, Maryland,
Colorado, North Carolina, Delaware, and New Mexico.
As part of our team, Labelle • Marvin will perform non-destructive testing and material
testing and design. Labelle • Marvin, incorporated in 1969, has full laboratory facilities
and field testing equipment include Road Raters.
DFA commonly assists clients in construction management. We provide clients with
assistance and guidance in administrative functions as well as field inspection. Recent
clients, who have benefitted from our construction management expertise, include the City
of Burbank, Lusk Development, the Town of Apple Valley and a special assessment
district in Chino.
DWIGHT
&�
PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING
The chart on the following page illustrates the project organization for this project. key
individual staff members include:
Henry Pao, RCE - As Project Manager, Mr. Pao will be responsible for
managing this project including in house and subconsultant staff. He will
coordinate communication with City staff. Mr. Pao has a masters degree
in civil engineering and 10 years of experience. He has served in a similar
capacity for all of the overlay projects listed in the previous section of this
proposal. he has also evaluated asphalt pavements in Apple Valley and
Denver, Colorado.
Mario Garcia, RCE - As Project Engineer, Mr. Garcia will be responsible for
the design of this project, as well as the engineer's estimate; plan and
specifications; and contract administration. Mr. Garcia has 8 years of
experience and is serving in a similar capacity for the overlay and widening
of Apple Valley Road in Apple Valley. In addition, he was project engineer
for the overlay and widening of Navajo Road in Apple Valley and for the
evaluation of 300 miles of streets in Apple Valley.
Ray Runco as Construction Inspector, Mr. Runco will be responsible for all
field inspection services on this project. He has over 30 years of experience
in street improvement projects in Southern California.
More complete resumes for these key staff follow the organization chart.
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
DIAMOND BAR
PROJECT COORDINATOR
PROJECT MANAGER
HENRY PAO R.C.E.
ND TESTING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEER INSPECTION
STEVE MARVIN MARIO GARCIA RAY RUNCO
R.C.E.
FIELD CREWS DESIGNERS
AND AND
EQUIPMENT DRAFTERS
DWIGHT FRENCH AND ASSOCIATES • ENGINEERS • DIAMOND BAR
DWIGHT
&AASSOCCIIAn
HUNG-YI PAO
EDUCATION
University of Kentucky, Ph.D (Candidate)
University of Cincinnati, M.S.C.E.
National Cheng -Kung University, B.S.C.E.
LICENSES
Civil Engineer:
California No. C 039087
Professional Engineer:
North Carolina No. 11809
South Carolina No. 11264
Tennessee No. 018638
Indiana No. 20576
Alabama No. 15418
Florida No. 0040405
Structural Engineer:
Kentucky No. 13556
SOCIETIES
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Concrete Institute
Digital Equipment Computer Users Society
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
SUMMARY
Senior design engineer with 10 years of experience with over 40 bridge design
assignments and several major roadway projects. Has related experience in roadway and
hydrographic analysis. Has considerable experience in CADD design and is familiar with
application for structural and infrastructure plans.
ROADWAY DESIGN
• 1.8 mile redesign of road and drainage for 1-40, N.C.
• Design of overlay Mission Boulevard, Ontario
• Design of overlay and widening Navajo Road, Apple Valley
• Design of overlay and widening Los Angeles Avenue, High Street, and Charles
Street, Moorpark
DWIGHT
&FRENCH
• Design of overlay and widening Fern Avenue, Mountain Avenue, Schaefer Avenue,
Cypress Avenue, San Antonio Avenue, Chino
• 3.6 mile traffic control plan for 1-85, N.C.
• 44 mile facility, including bridge and roadway design for Florida Turnpike extension
• 1.1 mile 5 lane urban roadway, Raleigh, N.C.
• 3.2 mile US 15-501 roadway/bridge design, Chapel Hill, N.C.
• 4 lane, 3 mile long design of Huntington Drive, Duarte, CA
Mr. Pao served as project manager/project engineer for the following projects:
INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN
• East Chin Specific plan - Assist in design and construction for 800 lots along with
related infrastructure, Chin, CA
• Design for various subdivision projects in LA, San Bernardino, and Riverside
Counties
• Parking lot design for City of Duarte, CA
• Site development for waste water treatment plant, ak Ridge, Tenn.
TRANSIT
Design two underground stations and tunnel for Tapai Rapid Mass Transit Line
BRIDGE DESIGN
• Widening of bridge over Cypress Channel, Chino
• 6 span bridge over Rocky River, N.C.
• 2 span pate girder bridge for Indiana East-West Toll Road
• 2 bridges on 1-95, Hartford, Conn.
• Preliminary design for 25 bridges, Orlando Central Connector
DWIGHT
cRENCH
IMS
MARIO C. GARCIA
EDUCATION:
University of California, Berkeley 1984
LICENSES:
Civil Engineer:
California No. C 43947
SOCIETIES:
American Society of Civil Engineers
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
National Society of Professional Engineers
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
SUMMARY
Mr. Garcia's background includes infrastructure planning, evaluation and design. He has
also worked on civil engineering assignments related to environmental engineering
projects. His assignments have included several drainage studies for roadways,
hazardous waste sites, and residential/commercial developments along with master plan
studies for sewer and drainage facilities. He has prepared grading and improvement
plans for various sites and has experience in CADD design for roadway, drainage and
utility projects.
ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE
• Two-mile widening and overlay, Apple Valley Road, Apple Valley, CA
• Two-mile roadway design, Navajo Road, Apple Valley, CA
• Drainage evaluation of proposed alignments for State Highway 50 through
Placerville, CA
• Surface and subsurface drainage design on landslide mass for highway drill site,
Pacific Palisades, CA
• One -mile horizontal and vertical alignment of proposed roadway, Bernal Avenue,
Pleasanton, CA
• Site hydrologic and drainage study, Alameda, CA
TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
• Traffic study for city wide EIR redevelopment plan, Westminster, CA
• Traffic study for city wide EIR redevelopment plan, Hanford, CA
• Traffic study for city wide EIR proposal condominium project, Pico Rivera, CA
DWIGHT
SAM&
INFRASTRUCTURE
• Development of Pavement Management System for Town of Apple Valley, CA
• Sanitary Sewer System Study - Moffett Field NAS, CA
• Master planning and water resources analysis for residential community; reservoir
siting and analysis, Pigeon Point, CA
LAND DEVELOPMENT
• Preparing annual maintenance budgets for Orange County EMA and assisting in
the planning, scheduling and evaluating of day to day work activities
• Prepare subdivision maps and plans for residential, commercial, and industrial
developments throughout Los Angeles County
• Permitting through local agencies for various planning activities such as zone
changes, conditional uses, variances, etc.
• Condominium plans for subdivisions or conversions in Diamond Bar, Los Angeles,
Pasadena, South Pasadena
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
• Oversee work of subcontractors performing underpinning and jacking of
condominium buildings subjected to soil failure, San Buenaventura, CA
• Manage subcontractor work for hazardous waste removal, Portola, CA
DWIGHT
nsso MA7A
RAYNARD F. RUNCO
EDUCATION
Associate of Arts, Civil Engineering, Fullerton Junior College
Attended night school at U.S.C., engineering courses
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
SUMMARY
1981 - Present DWIGHT FRENCH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Performing all types of inspection services, writing specifications for slurry and asphaltic
cement projects and investigating street conditions for cities and private companies.
1973-1981 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
City Services Coordinator
Coordinated County business with twenty-seven cities in Los Angeles County. Worked
with City Managers and Administrators on matters contracted by the cities and the L.A.
County Road Department. Advised the Cities of the different types of funds that were
available, helped with the advertising of construction projects and also investigated any
problems in the City contracts or services the Cities contracted for.
1956-1973 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
Senior Civil Engineer Assistant
Inspected all phases of roadway construction, interpreted plans and specifications,
coordinated work between the county departments, Cities and utility companies. Kept all
the residences and businesses in the area of the construction project informed of the
different phases of construction so they would be aware of the inconveniences. During
the period of inspection, I was a resident engineer on both large and small projects.
Some of the larger projects were federally funded projects which required all
bookkeeping, laboratory and field testing be under the resident engineer. These projects
included the construction of bridges, storm drains, retaining walls, excavation of roadways
which necessitated moving over a million cubic yards of material, placing of cement
concrete pavement with machines up to 38 feet in width and all other items of roadway
construction.
1952-1956 LOS ANGELS COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
Senior Civil Engineer Assistant
Designed all types of streets and highways in the design section.
DWIGHT
A�Mg
1948 - 1952 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
Draftsman, Civil Engineer Assistant
Engineering drafting and title research of legal documents.
1946 - 1948 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ENGINEER
Worked on a survey party for a private engineer.
DWIGHT
Asso =
SCOPE OF WORK
The following tasks are DFA's understanding of the scope of work involved in
investigating conditions, recommending rehabilitation, preparing plans and specifications
and providing construction management for rehabilitating the pavement on Golden
Springs Drive between Grand Avenue and Brea Canyon Road, a distance of
approximately 1.4 miles.
Task 1 Initiate project by meeting with City staff to coordinate the
project.
Task 2 Develop base sheets for the project from "as built" plans. The
base sheets will be to the scale of the "as built" plans.
Task 3 Collect and review existing soils data in the area of the
project. Extensive soils data which was collected as part of
the structural foundation investigation for Routes 57 and 60
will be used.
Task 4 Gather pavement deflection data from each travel lane at 200
foot intervals using a common pavement deflection device. In
addition, an extensive visual survey of the pavement and
drainage conditions will be made and logged.
Task 5 Core test existing pavement and base materials at
approximately 500 foot intervals along the project.
Task 6 Test samples of the cored materials from Task 5 will be tested
for asphalt content, moisture and R value.
Task 7 Determine alternate methods of pavement repair and their
cost benefit based on design life, traffic projection and
materials testing. The Caltrans Test method Number 356 will
be used for comparing overlay requirements. Rubberized
asphalt will be included in the analysis.
DWIGHT
&Fn�n79
Task 8 Present the alternate rehabilitation methods to the City Engineer for
review and discussion. Based on this review and discussion, the
Consultant and the City will select the rehabilitation method(s) to be
used.
Task 9 Prepare a typical section for the rehabilitation treatment which will
also be reviewed with City staff.
Task 10 Prepare plans and specifications for the rehabilitation project using
the base sheets from Task 2. Rubberized asphalt will be included as
a bid alternate. This task will involve City review at the 60% and 90%
completion stage. It is assumed that each of the review periods will
require 2 weeks.
Task 11 Prepare a traffic control plan for use during construction.
Task 12 Provide contract administration services including:
• preparation of advertisements,
• attendance at pre-bid conference,
• bid tabulation/evaluation,
• answering bidders questions,
• assisting city in award of contract,
• preconstruction conference,
• construction inspection survey,
• evaluation of progress payments, and
• as built plans.
This Scope of Work assumed that the City of Diamond Bar will supply existing and
projected traffic and "as built" plans.
N
M
N
N
N
rl
N
O
N
a%
rr
00
H
Ln
r-4
4
M
w
N
rl
0
74
0,0
J� N
U S -i
RS •rl
l� G
4.) 0'
G a)
o �4
U
a)
O fl
41
O
U
a� 'd
U G
O G
sa o
a•44
O N
-W .�4
a) 41
U G
u E
O4)
G U
R1
6 �
o a
p a)
wP
(1)"o
+-) G
Q) 10
a••-+
E ro
o;>
U O
E
O a)
-W p
0.i
G
o
z
u
G
U
O
N
�
G
�+
O
r
N
O
N
I-
00
O%
-4
rl
rd
,4
N
M
Lfl
IO
N
V)
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
(n
w
F4cn
•
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
•
TASK 1
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TASK 5
TASK 6
TASK 7
TASK 8
TASK 9
TASK 10
TASK 11
TASK 12
PROJECT BUDGET BY TASK
TOTAL
DWIGHT
&FCH
AMIA&
$200
$150
$500
$3,100
$2,800
$800
$2,825
$400
$1,200
$18,015
$1,300
$21,540
$54,85
ev�--4
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. S 11
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 19, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: The 1991-92 Slurry Seal Improvement Program - Area Two
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar is divided into seven areas as a basis for a road maintenance program
that enables the City to proceed with the orderly procession of a slurry seal improvement. The City, at this
time, desires to continue this program by implementing Area Two. Plans and specifications for the subject
project have been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approve the
plans and specifications of the 1991-92 Slurry Seal Project and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the project
for bids.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
— Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
Public Hearing Notification
X Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
_ Yes X No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
— Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
RE
WED B (
[ /t
K
Ro ert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger
Sid J. Mousavi
City Manager Assistant City Manager
City Engineer/Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: The 1991-92 Slurry Seal Improvement Program
Area Two
ISSUE STATEMENT
The plans and specifications of the 1991-92 Slurry Seal Project for
Area Two have been completed. This report requests the City
Council's approval and authorization to advertise the project for
bids.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and
specifications for the 1991-92 Slurry Seal Project, adopt the
attached Resolution, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the
project for bid.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The engineer's estimate for construction of this project is
$166,000.00 and Gas Tax Funds can be utilized.
BACKGROUND
The City of Diamond Bar is divided into seven areas as a basis for
a road maintenance program that enables the City to proceed with
the orderly procession of a slurry seal improvement. In fiscal
year 90-91, Area One was slurried and completed on June 14, 1991.
At this time the City desires to continue the program by
implementing Area Two.
DISCUSSION
Plans and specifications for the City of Diamond Bar's 1991-92
Slurry Seal Project have been prepared. The work to be performed
under the specifications consists of the slurry sealing of the
existing road pavement and other incidental and appurtenant work
necessary for the construction of the contemplated improvement in
Area Two.
Page Two
1991-92 Slurry Seal
February 19, 1992
Staff has prepared a tentative schedule for the various project
activities. They are as follows:
Plans and specifications to City Council
for approval and authorize City Clerk to
advertise for bids
Bid Opening
Award of Contract
Notice to Proceed
Start of Construction
Completion of Construction
Prepared By:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
March 3,1992
April 14, 1992
April 21, 1992
May 5, 1992
May 11, 1992
June 22, 1992
CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR
SLURRY SEAL PROJECT - AREA 2
TOTAL LENGTH: 18 MILES
PRIME CONTRACTOR LICENSE REQUIRED: A OR C12 OR C32
21
HOLT
71 AVE.
WALNUT „�4z,
POMONA '*-
0
BLV DIAMOND o
60 BAR
z
z
oma a w o
' vn moif
�Pany�� am0� CHINO
PROJECT LOCATION 57 pFR HILLS
LOS ANGELES CO.
ORANGE Co. VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET 1 TITLE SHEET
SHEET 2 LOCATION MAPS
SHEET 5 TYPICAL SECTION
SHEET 6-7 PAVEMENT MARKING
DETAILS
C.I.P. NO, 91=112
APPROVED
SUBMITTED
REFERENCES: 679, (H-4,5) 660, (A-3,4,5) REVIEWED
TG:1992 ED. 679, (J-3,4,5) 680, (B-2,3,4)
PROJECT ENGINEER: R.C.E. NO. DESIGNER: CHECKER:
H. PAO 39087 H. PAO A. TSE
52
If,
DATE
DATE
SHEET 1 OF 7 SHTS.
DWG.
NO.
53
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TG: 679, (J-3,4) DRAWN: J.H.
680, A-3,4,5)
SCALE: 1"= 600' DATE: 2/92
SLURRY SEAL PROJECT - AREA 2
54
PROJECT NO.
SHEET
3
■
r
r
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TG: 680, (B680 -2,3,4) DRAWN: J. H.
SCALE: 1"= 600DATE: 2/92
SLURRY SEAL PROJECT - AREA 2
55
PROJECT NO.
SHEET
4
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. S . 12
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 25, 1992
FROM: Joann M. Saul, Senior Accountant
TITLE:
Proposition A Local Return Fund and Transportation Development Act Audits for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 1991 and 1990.
SUMMARL
The City of Diamond Bar's Proposition A Local Return (Prop A) and Transportation Development Act
Funds (TDA) are required to be audited on an annual basis. The audit for fiscal year ended June 30,
1991 was completed in October 1991 by Quezada Godsey & Co., C.P.A. and Simpson & Simpson,
C.P.A.
The final version of the audits were received in the City offices in February 1992 and are being
presented to Council for their review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive, accept and file Proposition A Local Return Fund and Transportation Development Act Fund
Audit Reports for fiscal year ending June 30, 1991 and 1990.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report
_ Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
T Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
XX Other CgWes of HgUajiye Audits
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
Yes
2X No
by the City Attorney?
_
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
Yes
2X No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_
Yes
XX No
Which Commission?
_
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
Yes
XX No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
RE
WED BY
Robert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger
(Department
)
City
Manager Assistant City Manager
COPY
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE
REPORT OF THE TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
JUNE 30, 1991 AND 1990
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE REPORT
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1991
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Section
Page
Independent Auditors' Report I
Balance Sheet - Section 99234 3
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance and Budget and Actual for the
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1991 - Section 99234 4
Notes to Financial Statements
Supplemental Information
5
Schedule of Transportation Development Act Allocations
for Specific Projects (Exhibit 1) 7
Schedule of Completed Projects 8
Compliance Section
Independent Auditors' Report on Transportation
Development Act Compliance 9
Exit Conference 10
FINANCIAL SECTION
14B.11QUEZADA
GODSEY & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBL,C 4CMAJ-4,N S
3580 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 1200
LOS ANGELES, CA 90010
213-380.0542
October 25, 1991
To The Honorable Members of
The City Council of Diamond Bar
Diamond Bar, California
im pson-�� im son
p6T60 WILSNIRE BOULEVARD, SURE 286
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90036
271938.3326
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
We have audited the balance sheet of the Transportation Development Act Funds of the City of
Diamond Bar as of June 30, 1991 and the related statement of revenues, expenditures and
changes in fund balance for the year then ended. These statements are the responsibility of the
City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
As more fully described in Note 2, the statements present only the Transportation Development
Act Funds and are not intended to present fairly the financial position and results of operations
of the City in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In our opinion, the statements referred to in the opening paragraph present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Transportation Development Act Funds of the City of
Diamond Bar as of June 30, 1991, and the results of its operations and changes in the fund
balance for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying supplemental information, listed in the foregoing table of contents, is not
necessary for a fair presentation of the statements referred to in the opening paragraph, but is
presented as additional analytical data. The supplemental information has been subjected to the
tests and other auditing procedures applied in the audits of the statements and, in our opinion,
is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City and the Los Angeles
County Transportation Commission (LACTC) and should not be used for any other purpose.
This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which, upon acceptance
by the City Council and the LACTC, is a matter of public record.
-2-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
BALANCE SHEET
Pertaining to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code
JUNE 30, 1991
ASSETS
1991
Cash $18,771
Interest Receivable 347
Total Assets $19,118
FUND BALANCE
Unrestricted Fund Balance 19,118
Total Fund Balance 19,118
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $19,118
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
- 3--
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES
IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1991
Pertaining to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code
1991
Variance
Favorable
Budget Actual MaNvorable)
REVENUES
Article 3 (Note 5) $18,709 $18,709
interest Revenue 409 409
Total Revenues 19,118 19,118
EXPENDITURES
Various Projects (Exhibit 1)
Total Expenditures
Excess (Deficit) of Revenues
over Expenditures 19,118 19,118
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance $19,118
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 1991
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fund Accounting
The operations of the Section 99234 funds of the Transportation Development Act are accounted
for in separate self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund balance, revenues
and expenditures.
The SB 821 Fund accounts for the City's share of the Transportation Development Act
allocations, which are legally restricted for specific purposes.
Basis of Accounting
The SB 821 Fund is accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting whereby
revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available to finance liabilities
of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liabilities are incurred.
Budgets and Budgetary Accounting
Budgets are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
NOTE 2 - ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The financial statements are intended to reflect the financial position, results of operations and
compliance with the Transportation Development Act for the Transportation Development Act
Funds only.
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash is pooled to maximize investment opportunities and yields. Investment income resulting
from this pooling is allocated to the respective funds, including the Transportation Development
Act Funds, based upon average monthly cash balances.
-5-
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 1991
NOTE 4 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with Section 99234 of the Transportation Development Act, funds received
pursuant to this code section may only be used for facilities provided for exclusive use by
pedestrians and bicycles.
NOTE 5 - REVENUE
The City of Diamond Bar did not apply for Transportation Development Act Funds duing fiscal
year ended June 30, 1990. Fiscal year ended June 30, 1991 was the first year that the City of
Diamond Bar received Transportation Development Act Funds.
-6-
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
SCHEDULE OF ALLOCATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PROJECTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1991
Project
Description
Sidewalk/Bikeway
Totals
Unexpended Interest
Accumulated -to -Date
Fund Balance, June 30, 1991
EXHIBIT 1
Program
Totals to Date
Unexpended
Project
Year
Allocations Expenditures
Allocations
Status
90-91
$18,709
$18,709
Open
$18,709 $18,709
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
_,
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
SCHEDULE OF COMPLETED PROJECTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1991
Project
Description Totals
Allocations EXDenditureS
None
Interest Applied
Totals
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
COMPLIANCE SECTION
CIS-lbGODSE
QUEZADA
Y & CO.
CLRFIFIFD PUBL;C-CCCUNT4%1�3580 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 1200
LOS ANGELES, CA 90010
13-380.0642
October 25, 1991
To the Honorable Members
of the City Council
Of the City of Diamond Bar
Diamond Bar, California
im pson
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
�� Simpson
S - 5750 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 286
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90036
211.938-3324
REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT COMPLIANCE
We have audited the balance sheet, statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund
balance of the Transportation Development Act Funds of the City of Diamond Bar for the year
ended June 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon dated October 25, 1991. Our audit
was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; and was further made to
determine compliance with the Transportation Development Act (TDA), including Section
99234, the rules and regulations of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission; and
accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures
as we considered necessary under the circumstances. Among the items considered were
determination of eligibility of the City to receive funds allocated to it, and propriety of
expenditures in accordance with TDA and the regulations of the Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission.
In our opinion, the funds allocated to the City under the TDA were accounted for and expended
in conformance with the TDA, and the rules and regulations of the Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission..
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City and the Los Angeles
Transportation Commission (LACTIC), and should not be used for any other purpose. This
restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which, upon acce
City Council and the LACTC, is a matter of public record. ptance by the
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS
EXIT CONFERENCE
JUNE 30, 1991
An exit conference was held on October 25, 1991 at the City of Diamond Bar. Those in
attendance were:
Audit Firm:
Quezada Godsey & Co.
Renee Hszieh, Auditor
City's Representatives:
Joann Saul, Senior Accountant
Matters Discussed:
Results of audit and audit report.
- 10-
P
` Pomona Valley
f
AudubonSociety
536 W. Whitcomb Ave. Glendora, CA 91740
March 3, 1992
The City Council
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
Telephone: 714-860-2489
FAX: 714-861-3117
Dear Council Members:
RE: Updated DEIR for Tentative
Tracts 47850, 47851, 48487
The Conservation Committee of Pomona Valley Audubon Society, a
chapter of the National Audubon Society, has studied the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), as updated, for the tentative
tracts cited above. As stated in our comments submitted January
21, 1992, we are very concerned about the proposed development
based on species ommissions, incompliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the lack of a Tree
Preservation Ordinance in the City of Diamond Bar. Please include
these additional comments in the administrative record.
We would ask you to comply with California State Assembly Bill
3080, now an important element of CEQA, and develop a full and
adequate "Mitigation Monitoring Plan" for the proposed project
area.
Sincerely:
Bruce Farnsworth
Conservation Chairperson
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 26, 1992
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102
SUMMARY: Bryan Stirrat and Associates are requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 22102
for a minor subdivision to create two (2) lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel, located at 1575 S. Valley
Vista Drive, in the Gateway Corporate Center. In response to the action of the City Council on the
January 21, 1992, a resolution of denial has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to a request, from the applicant, it is recommended that this matter be
postponed to April 7, 1992.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
EWED B
obert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger
City. Manager Assistant City Manager
X Yes _ No
MAJORITY
X Yes _ No
X Yes _ No
PLANNING COMMISSION
X Yes _ No
ENGINEERING
16
*&WZP
.Vmes DeStefan
Community Dev lopment Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Bryan Stirrat and Associates are requesting a Tentative Parcel Map for a
minor subdivision to create two (2) lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel,
located at 1575 S. Valley Vista Drive, in the Gateway Corporate Center. In
response to the action of City Council at the January 21, 1992 meeting, a
resolution of denial has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to a request from the applicant, it is recommended that this matter
be postponed to April 7, 1992.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Bryan Stirrat and Associates are requesting a Tentative Parcel
Map (TPM N0. 22102) to create two (2) lots from an existing parcel which is
4.39 acres in the Gateway Corporate Center.
The proposed project is zoned Commercial Manufacturing -Billboard Exclusion-
Unilateral/Contract (CM-BE-U/C). Generally, the following uses surround the
site: to the North is CM-BE-U/C zone; to the South is CM-BE-U/C and Single -
Family Residence (R-1-10,000) zone; to the East is CM-BE-U/C zone; to the
West is CM-BE-U/C zone and the Orange (57) Freeway.
At the City Council meeting of January 21, 1992, the public hearing was
closed. At this time, staff was directed to prepare a resolution of denial.
The applicant has asked that the Council continue this matter until April 7,
1992 in order to resolve pending issues surrounding this project.
PREPARED BY:
Ann J. Linau P1 ning Technician
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. / ,I
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992 REPORT DATE: February 19, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Landscaping Assessment District No. 38
SUMMARY: The City of Diamond Bar has an annual program for the maintenance of city wide landscaped
open space improvements and intends to continue said program by special assessments upon lands within the
City's Landscaping Assessment District No. 38. District No. 38 is a citywide district and it is established to
benefit all property owners within the City of Diamond Bar. Each parcel within the City equally receives
general benefits from the increase in the community standards and associated property value. Therefor it is
recommended that the City annex a portion of the City which was not contained in the original District No.
38. Proceedings for the maintenance of said improvements will be pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopt the
attached Resolution to initiate the proceedings for the annexation of lands into Landscaping Assessment District
No. 38 and authorize staff to prepare the Engineer's Report.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
_ Yes X No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
_ Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
RE WED BY:
Robert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager Assistant City Manager
�y44f
Sid J. Mousavi
City Engineer/Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Landscaping Assessment District No. 38
ISSUE STATEMENT
The City proposes to annex a portion of the City which was not
contained in the original District No. 38.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution to initiate the proceedings for the annexation of lands
into Landscaping Assessment District No. 38 and authorize staff to
prepare the Engineer's Report.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The costs associated with preparation of the Engineer's report is
estimated to be $3,000. The revenue generated by this District is
proposed to pay for it. There will be no impact on the City's
General Fund.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City has an annual program for the maintenance of landscaping
as well as open space improvements, and intends to continue said
program by special assessments upon lands within the City. Since
all parcels within the City of Diamond Bar receive general benefit
from the increase in community standards and associated increase in
property value, it is recommend that for 1992-93 Fiscal Year the
City annex a portion of the City which was not contained in the
original District No. 38. Attached is a copy of the map that has
outlined the proposed annexation area. The annexation will enable
the City to provide funds for construction and maintenance of
landscaped areas and median islands throughout the city.
Proceedings are provided for by the provisions of the Landscape and
Lighting Act of 1972 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Prepared By:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF LANDS INTO
LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38, GENERALLY DESCRIBING
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT DURING FISCAL YEAR
1992-93 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT
THEREON.
A. RECITALS.
( i) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, has an annual
program for the maintenance of certain landscaping and open space improvements
and property and intends to continue said program and the cost of such
maintenance to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments upon lands
within City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment District No. 38; and
( ii) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, proposes to
annex certain lands into City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment District
No. 38; and
(iii) Proceedings are provided for by the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2, Division 15, of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California;
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby
resolve, determine and order as follows:
1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the
intention of the Council, to maintain landscaping and open space improvements
and property hereafter mentioned in said maintenance district in the City.
2. The Council hereby determines in general the nature,
location and extent of said maintenance district as follows:
Landscaping Assessment District No. 38 and the lands to be
annexed consist of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown
on the assessment diagram labeled "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
The maintenance and restoration of landscaping and open
space improvements, including irrigation, pruning, fertilization, pest
control, weed control, drainage systems, irrigation control system
improvements, and miscellaneous related work within easement areas for said
purpose within the above properties.
The annual program for maintenance work within Landscaping
Assessment District No. 38, Fiscal Year 1992-93 is conducted by City force
account, contractual services, the City Manager's work program, and the
functional budget for Fiscal Year 1992-93 describes the general nature,
location and extent of the improvements. These documents are hereby
incorporated by reference as if set forth in this resolution.
3. The Council hereby orders the preparation and filing of an
Engineer's Report pursuant to said Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSES, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1992.
ayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, the City Clerk of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of
1992 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
—ow
Twil;
All
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.2.1
NO DOCIIMENTATION AVAILABLE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.2.2
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.2.3
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE