HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/04/1992CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Mayor — Jay C. Kim
Mayor Pro Tem — Phyllis E. Papen
Councilman — John A. Forbing
Councilman — Gary H. Werner
Councilman — Gary G. Miller
City Council Chambers
are located at:
South Coast Air Quality Management District Board Room
21165 East Copley Drive
Please refrain from smo ing, eating or drinking'm t e ounce Chambers
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Andrew V. Arczynski
City Attorney
MEETING TIME: closed Session - 5:00 p.m. Lynda Burgess
Regular Session - 6:00 p.m. City Clerk
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item referred to bn this agenda
are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are �availal#le for' Oublic i, lotionQWA#V6i.vud.4flons
regarding; an agenda item. please contact the Cita Clerk at (714) 160-2489 durioo business hours.
The City of Diamond Bar uses RECYCLED paper and encourages you to do the same.
THIS MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST LIVE BY JONES INTERCABLE
FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM,
YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED.
1. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9
Personnel - Government Code Section 54957.6
Next Resolution No. 92-03
Next Ordinance No. 2(1992)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR KIM
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN FORBING, MILLER, WERNER,
MAYOR PRO TEM PAPEN, MAYOR KIM
3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual
Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be
given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action
at a future meeting.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time
reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on
this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to
the City Clerk (comnletion of this form is voluntary) There
is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City
Council.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the
Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a
single motion.
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
5.1.1
GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - February 8,
1992 - 8:00 - 11:00 A.M., AQMD Room CC -2,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.2
PLANNING COMMISSION - February 10, 1992 - 7:00
P.M., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.3
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - February
13, 1992 - 6:30 P.M., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865
E. Copley Dr.
5.1.4
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - February 13,
1992 - 7:00 P.M., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley
Dr.
5.1.5
GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - February 15,
1992 - 8:00 - 11:00 A.M., AQMD Room CC -2,
21865 E. Copley Dr.
FEBRUARY 4, 1992 PAGE 2
5.2 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated
February 4, 1992 in the amount of $573,434.62.
5.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Receive and file Planning
Commission Minutes of January 13, 1992.
5.4 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
22102, A REQUEST TO DIVIDE A 4.39 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO
LOTS AT 1575 VALLEY VISTA DRIVE WITHIN THE CM-BE-U/C
ZONE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - Bryan
Stirrat & Associates have requested approval of a
Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102 for a minor subdivision to
create two (2) lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel in the
Gateway Corporate Center. In response to the action of
the City Council at the meeting of January 21, 1992, a
resolution of denial has been prepared.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -XX denying
Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102.
5.5 DEER CROSSING SIGN - On January 21, 1992, Council was
informed that deer have been visible and attempting to
cross Grand Ave. near the Golden Springs Dr. inter-
section. It was suggested that a "Deer Crossing" sign be
installed. According to the Walnut Sheriff Station and
the California Highway Patrol, no accidents involving
deer have not been recorded. The Department of Fish and
Game have not identified the area as a deer passage,
although deer may be present in the area.
Recommended Action: Deny the request to install "Deer
Crossing" signs on Grand Ave. near the Golden Springs Dr.
intersection.
5.6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-45D: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS
REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF
ABSENCES, AND OTHER REGULATIONS - Amending Resolution No.
95-45C by modifying the language of Section 15 related to
the paying for accrued sick leave, which is in excess of
the maximum allowable accumulated amount. Also the
salary of the position of City Manager is adjusted to
reflect an increase of 3.5%.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90-45D,
amending Section 15, Sick Leave and the salary of the
City Manager position.
6. OLD BUSINESS:
6.1 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING SERVICES -
On December 17, 1991, Council directed staff to evaluate
the comparative qualifications and service capabilities
of two solid waste providers: Community Disposal and
FEBRUARY 4, 1992
VB
8.
PAGE 3
Western Waste Industries. Subsequently, staff prepared
a Request for Information and distributed it to the
companies. After careful consideration of the history of
solid waste collection services in the community, it has
been determined that the scope of the Request for
Information process be broadened to include Waste
Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
Recommended Action: The scope of the Request for
Information process be broadened to include Waste
Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
PUBLIC HEARING:
7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 89-97F: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL - All
cities are required to adopt conflict of interest codes
designating certain positions participating in making
decisions which may affect financial interests. Since
adoption of the City's Code on October 3, 1989,
amendments have been necessary to add new or obsolete
positions.
Recommended Action: Open Public Hearing, receive
testimony and adopt Resolution No. 89-97F adding the
positions of Associate Engineer, Assistant to the City
Manager and Administrative Assistant as well as various
contracting firms currently doing business with the City.
7.2 COMMUNITY BLOCK DEVELOPMENT GRANT - The City has
scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and
budgets for use of Community Development Block Grant
funds (CDBG). The City expects to receive approximately
$169,916.00 in federal funds as a participant in the
1992-93 Los Angeles Urban County CDBG Program. The funds
may be used for a variety of Community Development
activities which develop a viable urban community
principally for persons of low and moderate income. The
purpose of the public hearing is to solicit testimony and
receive presentations from public service organizations
requesting funds prior to taking action on the final
statement of program objectives.
Recommended Action: Open the public hearing, receive
testimony and continue the public hearing to February 18,
1992 for final action on the 1992-93 CDBG Program.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
9. ADJOURNMENT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. T
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS: C
3a3
ORGANIZATION: 32
SUBJECT:
U
I expect to address the Council on theb- t MQ�eendajtem. Please have the
a�a
Council Minutes reflect my name an ;Ltte bove.
?rress s w�"
iSignature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and addreos the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring,'that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE, CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM O. f7. z
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM: fz-Faf-p-
ADDRESS: Vi S� x mak6,.;
ORGANIZATION: 6cv J S o F feel cis -SUBJECT: C Da G " bo :�oJtS cyf A►rimw- ,e—
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Signature
NOTE: Allp ersons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: .2-/ GI /Cn U�
-6;J
TO:
��E--
TO: City Clerk
h v ✓� u�c. Cr%rti.a �.v'z B.
FROM: /Vl AX Mh X t�✓Gt L
ADDRESS: �2 `/ � � 'ri✓
ORGANIZATION: 3"c/ -)r
SUBJECT: / %Gr/"► �% /p�r�'L C ew r -4 -t - Z3
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address/ as
written above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: ;�%- r -,;—
TO:
TO: City Clerk
FROM: l Zr
ADDRESS: /V�tT�/-
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT: ( j
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as writt� above.
ture
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. Z71
DATE: sZ"�'- �'�
TO: City Clerk
FROM: /�/ Z_ ( 'i��✓�.G /�
ADDRESS: Z 3 % 5� (X 13,,VL C',4,
ORGANIZATION: s F1- F
SUBJECT: 11SZ /C CC Al i
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as writen above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
V
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE:ri�
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT •
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Sianature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. 5,4
DATE: 2-/16 Z„
TO: City Clerk Q /
FROM: l'� 1 <, l4 _n M.
ADDRESS: 13 00 VA It" V, VA O21VE bommd `4
ORGANIZATION: A.
SUBJECT: 92 Wk, 1-6,b i � �$o ,nn �
qq
PI 2 -17 -(OL
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and acVress as written above.
Signhture
names in the Minutes.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. G-/
"ql v/,7a
City Clerk c
12
ADDRESS • I 1 a.9 a- uJ Ade
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT • Sc>(i c� IFAS Co //Q c�� ia� t► j/ C.%ir�c� -
I expect to address the Council on the subject aqfflmQa item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as
rit --/
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Pro Tem Pape.�n and Councilmember Forbing
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson T�Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, February 4, 1992
DATE: January 30, 1992
Attached is the Voucher Register dated February 4, 1992. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
it's entry on the Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated February 4, 1992 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
001
General Fund
112
Prop A Transit Fd
138
LLAD #38 Fund
139
LLAD #39 Fund
141
LLAD #41 Fund
225
Grand Ave. Const Fd
250
CIP Fund
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
I
Linda G. Magh on
Senior Accoun nt
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
AMOUNT
$555,736.81
1,351.35
5,567.04
5,908.21
3,163.36
956.85
751.00
$573,434.62
Phyllis E. Papen
Mayor Pro Tem
Joh A. Forbing
Councilmember
s}+ +'i of ..1,ono (ar
Ri V 1Mk: $9:'36 1; ;'8!92 V G U C H i R , R a:C . 5 E R
;L'_ii T":..........
.... e2/041y:'
V::NDOR 'd:; "I V000 0. + t P;ti_P:513 t 3
ACCOt!NT p c:i... T.t . a DITCH PG.I Ni iNS. ENIRYIDUF IN'va"i'F Dt *J- RIP 1ItIN AMCi KI P.1;E CHH
19 2 rMFG Conference i9')2CS"iG
+$0I-t,kr,0-23:40 1 ?2704D
A_,:uraTa i.aniacane
A;:,:t;rat�
+136-45:P.2z1.e
120?84E
+d;;9-45;9-27.18
1 %'0284
+13?• -4536-2t1.$
2 28284E
$lr'?' 0?/04
1 2$2t4E
+i3'-4539 5500
1 2078;E
Advdnta;e Ras;fioa
Al.taas True Value
+081-4310.1288
*001-4310-1200
idvdntas}?
1 287846
.411.rsrrue
1 '187846 11.111 A;
2 ^8224A 12/1185
4pr scan Plalirili,1 A'is,)c AVIdnAsc
+801-4210-7320 1 24284A
Asioc Fnviro r'rofas iar.al A�oiFnvPru
+801-4210 ?315 1 7070��fi
3 & K Electric `io la.:ate S&Ktteit
+001-431.0-12a8 5 20284E 03/11.83
Eav1a-i5 'Stationers pavle•i;
+001-11030-1280 1 207$4A
AAs?. Juiin r. 5.kp1
+001-4553 41 P.0 i 282840
0112,' 0?!04
CS"9rJ Cor}f 5aul,Maanus;,;
410.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------•
41iM
$lr'?' 0?/04
23fS
Maint-Dist 36
22.16
01129 82/04
23516
Maint Dist 439
$1/29 02/04
?3636
Maint-Dict tat:
28x.00
81129 02/04
23744
:Tan paint -Dist 38
3.1s30.00
e1/21' 02/04
23:145
Jan mint -Dist 39
5.580.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------,
Ui37.60
01126 02104
RefunO-Hldo Permit
81,.00
TGFAL DiJE V:=NDOR--------
I/,.0$
01120 02104
028?8
Uner'at inq Smp] ip.:.-Prks
7.56
01/26 02/04
020:30
]opratina 9uoulies-Prks
13.57
TOM DUE VENDOR --------;
21.15
eii?e, 02/04
Devlp/hviro Subs-Irptn
ise.0
701AL DUE WADOR--------;
40.$0
01176 07104
Annual Herber Dues
68100
100L DUE Vi•:+IL`uR-------->
1:0.00
01129 22/01
17321.7
Goeratin:I sm;plie
95.59
TO fAL OIJE VENDuR--------j
19.59
01/2A $7/04
1140263:{
s..;Dc;iip5-Mal-kers
11.30
10A 3V MOOR -------->
ti.30
01/21' 071x4
Trfc Comm Mtg-Jan
40.00
T!ifI,L DUE VENDOR --------;
4a.00
p f f+ 1{ Y U t i2 ri fF U n d v fl a r +++
/
i R
DUt Tt;F,U
............. o"o",92
WNr!1tl N IME V. N JR 111), + ;tEFp;D f
FC"r_",i1;.kT Pi,C:=.TX-N9 BITCH ?t.I INFiN9, EIN RY/ )iJE INVCTr_F Df:XRIFIINNM
RdtINT DAE Cr�Ck:
RE t i i9fiitin:. products BeStt.tcl
foci -4_:'1-1[18 1 26724E 81/12"8
Buns C1ui3/5an 6al;riai Vlv 'oy;i;lub
+001-4551.-5`26 1 MM
9r*a, City ;f Brsacity
+821- 431.8•'53+:8 1 2826/ R
8112'=; 82/04 11.41
81/2" 82/84
81/28 02/04
C.?. Traffic 5iors CJTraffic
+112 430-5.x15 2 2o204A 8111266?. 01.12 87/84 2993
California Surfar o,: CA.Sofface
foal -4316 221.8 2 28784E 8111754
Chavnrs, J. Todd Cl.avarsJT
f08i-4553-4188 2 282840
C;uu_k. I iodstri.f d A,;s.x ChimKI And
+061-1871 1 MAR
081-1+310-1226 4 20244D 41/1263
r01211 arld I-�?e
+801-461.8-4888
1¢01 -'talo -4204
foal -481.8-4884
IM -1 -Ata -Wee
foal -4810-4080
Cul'Iole
1 282848
2 20264D
3 207848
4 2.0224M
5 MAR
6 202048
81/2'; 82184 156,
e,.1i25 02/84
0112!, 82/84 2427
81126 02104 2427
0112t 8244
60126 02/84
01126 82/84
8ti26 87/04
01126 82/84
81126 62164
Maint-SycaIlOrE Cyn
1.19.41
TFAL DUE VIIADOR-------->
Graffiti RetavaI-Dece(Owy:
985.88
TU f,IL DUE V; NDUR--------i
905.02
Feb-Rec.reata Contrc.t Svc5
26,92:x.80
TFJFAL DILE VIARR--------;
ih.H'%3,82
Fab Transit Svcs
1,351.3y
.10M. DUE VENDOR -------->
Mainl-Mac le trill
1,5T5.88
TDFAL DUE VENDUR --------';
1.5.5.82
Trfc Cosa lStq-Jan
48.88
TUiAL DUE VENDUR--------;
42.82
Sales, Tax Due
23.26--
Siaipood Dry-Racr^axn
"84.45
- 0MI DUE VENDOR. ------- ;
261.211
Liab Reortno-Admins
42.00
t-iab R000rtg-Chan
115.82
Liab Reoort-Calleros
163.59
Liab Raprt-t.ancas
235.63
Liab Rmt-Hunt
41.36
Liab Report -Scott
?37.54
IiITAL DOF VENDOR --------
641.3,q
RON TIME, M46 01130/9? V 0 U C H I E R R .4 E -0 G o I a 9 d E B R a r
D �. i
IJ I- ............. 02J04,yq'13
VINIOR NAK-
Tp
IT
NQ 2ATI , 1,4 rj
I R Y / 0
1 c
11;'11
+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
---- -------------------------------------------------
rI,,i5.?,IjIIitv 1111jljstri�,S
C!,*IiIIIUO
f02 I - 451e- St V
1 ?M4
Qj 2/0
Litter Abatp*aL Sic -Dec
506.e4
MAL DUE VVNIDUR --------- f
S96.0
p
20224E
92/94
23I9I
Dec Swepainq Svc
15,194.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
15,104.83
Cuouter Apoli;?d Syjt=,#s
CAS
*921-4050-4032
1 20204A
01128 92/e4
920901
Feb Maint,
145.02
IHI-4510-120
I 24224A
2t/28 02/04
92159I
w,2/I0I9 Folts
5
S6. iS
IOTA) DOE VFND(IR ----------
801.75
CKS Assodatps
DI(S
+001-4551-5221
2 RME
91/2c,' 02124
14541
Retainage -M1 Larl CrsWalk
92.9
5221
1 2920;;701129
02/N
14558
Rpfaina, . , : @-DB Bike 1.31,e
111TAt Dill VENDOR --------
142.52
DM-irfliz, Pat
11+6
Ml -?';14
1 MM
01128 02104
R2,:reat ion Refood
3S. Oe
TOTAL DUE V,--..N))0R ---------
35.93
Dij'A"'Ild Bar Asoc
0321;-iAssoc
20204A
01/28 07104
Coaman Area Maint-FEb
17).00
TorAl. DUE VENDOR --------
117.0
1901-4030 1702
3 28284E 31,/1213
12t, 02/94
8337928
Credit Mmi-Misr. Sotwplies
2.72
>E901 4290-1192
2 207014B 36/1213
01126 02/24
5309021
rr:?Ilit 4,:*G-Misc
31.76-
4
2 202049 3711213
126 92/04
8370s5
Calendars-hur
3.0;1
IM -1220
4 2870IJ 78/1? 13
31/28 02/24
8:1179494
Misc SU001i:?S-CiII7r
12.02
*N11 -L.510 -IM
3 MM 3111/1713
01128 02/04
83111m4
Misc. SunPlips-pub Wks
211.09
If021-4219-1209
I ?0?0J+B 140/1213
31128 92/04
Suo'lli*S-PIng
4 S.25
*021 4090-1100
3 2004P 43i12131
01728 92/04
9399S22
SnIfIlies-Spr, G..Ivt
65.75
1 2044 4211213
91/28 02/24
9IP)PIi,?S-fiII-JII(72
37.36
*001 4510-1202
4 20294B 41/1213
01/28 0/0
8399577
SuDolieq-pub Wks
14.48
5 22?04B 146/1213
81128 02/04
1408311
SuI)0Ii:?5-P'jh 0S
17.16
*921 4999-1100
4 Mt.Fl 44/1213
91128 02104
M 26053
Gzlvt
45.40
Mi 49-120
2 702548 4511213
81/28 02/04
8431315
Supplip-s-Finance
Y2.17
10TAt Dill VENDOR --------
3213.93
+ City of DiaaJnd bar *++
R ;! i? M c: 9,91:46 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R PA q
4
DUE THM.............87/+J4iv2
VWDUR NIAMU VENDOR 1!1, } 4 P ,: +
u0 2111"H °10 !Xi !Nil. ;_VIRYiDOE
-.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entan;+an1�-Navin
+021-4@le•2110 1 202813
00011
Exx il'S
+011-4038-231@
3 222845
X021 -431? -2317
5 ?22@4;i
+021-4310.2310
4 2M!,P,
f@21 '+@30-1318
5 2020'+5
f@21 4310-231@
3 272845
31,63512
1 2t204B
{@81.4030-2317
1 70'1845
.221-'1030-1318
2 204413
f001-4030-231@
4 2720'1&
IM -4310-2312
?- 782@4B
+021-4210-2310
1 282245
F:Mpyal Fxorps koro.
W-1-4210-21.78 2 MM
Frit. Art FritZA
+•021-4513 41 P,$ 4 222741:
67E "alifornia hTE
10,14,313 2121, 1 202015
bTE!_ STtL
+021-4090-21x8 1 202048
pon-salvs I Son. Jaz A. Gon-:41 os
+021-4010-4002 1 202045
Har,sonv. Clair 'Aa r,aanvC
+021-334 4 20284A
@1121
02104
3 City Baaves
164.08
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
164.00
01128
@2104
31,63512
Fuel -Mir
111.00
0108
2212'+
3`563836
Fus?I-Pan
17.52
0112.1
@2/04
49SS941
Full-PSm
36.05
01/7.8
82(04
4956324
i=aN1-Cngr
14.12
01121
@2104
4963114
Fuel -P&O,
14.98
81/28
22/04
4963151
F:N1-Ndtl
29.'42
@1128
02/04
4963215
Fuel-ACtur
15.54
0t128
02/24
496:M2
13.@0
01/2.102/04
63112131
Fuel-ACor
10.07
01128
02/04
6362346
F.al-N3M
;30.34
01!21
02/04
6::.2510
Fuel-Plno
22.73
TOTAL DIJE VENDOR --------7
218.2'5
01/21
062104
EXoress Mail -Piny
13.00
MAL DUE V:_NDOR---••---->
13.02
el129
0/04
Trfc Cnm� Mtn Jars
40.02
TO AL DIJE VcND!1R--------)
48.02
@i/2F
02104
Jar; Phone Sri -Heritage Pk
5,1,.1A
1001- DUE VENDOR --------)
516.18
01128
02104
Feb E:1uiu Rental
636.83
TONAL DIiE VENDOR -- ----}
96.83
01/2,1t
0214
Prof Sans -Fah
2,10@.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
7..102.02
0i.i2P
@?104
Refand-Calldidate 5tattent
74.65
313 i AL DIJE V,:V1)QR---------
74.(•,5
RIJI 1iMF: 9:'.6 9ii'ei42 V O U C H t: R R- S'+i 3 i E :R
ry�t. t'i..,.
r.. ......... ,2 r rf `-. i 9'
L. ti , -1 t. TRY/Jt+E IA'JOTC:t t) N,1P1ti+ A''it14T 1) 0.
4401.iodpr Pub!icatio:i; Hirh!wd:rr
+0a1 23 2 1@1e
i?c 1P;
01121
02/94
1499e
#adi'd3v,2-10ta
1
01!2$
22194
39 7
+821- M9 21.15
5 2+328 B
+0?1 211@-18a6
1 2 2.4fi
X112,°.
2? sr
*801- 1t7-122/
%n? -,4A
W2t
72/94
4401.iodpr Pub!icatio:i; Hirh!wd:rr
+0a1 23 2 1@1e
2 22224E
01121
02/94
1499e
#adi'd3v,2-10ta
1
01!2$
22194
39 7
+821- M9 21.15
5 2+328 B
?1-121
@2/04
3749
X221-'+112-2115
4 ?M'+R
2ti28
02/24
7497
+021-4219 211.5
3 222248
e1/21
0?/@4
872P
ICMA ??ti-lLm t Trust -457 1CMA
+001 -?11@-1907
1 292741'
.221-'+1132 -@012
1
+011-4@3200'•;e
1 292240
IM .r+111rA y' 9 1
872
1 In
Wi-4@50 2892
1 2727,,0
#t21 -'121'-v'-1978
i 22?9i+C
+231-48;8-2115
1. 29204C
s?ai-4512 6@va
1 22241.
Ir?1ar1d Va11LAv DIV Rulletn IU B
031-2302-1e10
4 2020'.0
10i-1+?11-2115
6 2`12044
+0:31-4646-2115
1 20224C
<e21-%228-1019
3 292240
+021-4 :e-21.14
2 222240
6t1 !+112-2115
8 MK
+231-48;8-2115
3 22?2:;,"
#691-4210-2115
7 72?240
81/21 82/@
x1/28 02/04
81/21 82/64
01/28 tM4
21121: 8!/84
21/?8 02/84
81121 62/84
01/28 22.194
61/21 02184 60142+
91/28 0/24 !1121424
61126 62104 dr.21A44
x1;28 22/24 41:2.1849
01/?A 82164 ric21.8?.4
61/28 22;14 dr.22414
61.J29 821@4 d(225e9
31/29 72194 d03721
Trent Pre:= -Feb 92 749. 89
Vision P: xa Ftt, 92r..5?
'.3n Pr+:� i;nrr:rctr /,.47
10TA; DUE VENDOR --------; 1,e98.?l
PC Mta-TTM 59 19
Pub Hra-ADR 9113
@s'A0 MLc!-Jer: 16
6?AC Mtn
Pi: Mt(! COP 91-14
TU TAI. 111,,E Vs_NDuR
Jar: corrtrihutiaru
VsnN�,rt-t:�b r'.DntPlb
Fe;. CnntrFtnrt>an5
Feb contrib
Fi)thCar,irib
,-Curitrib
Ft.b Cantrib
F?b Cuntrib
10TA: DUE VHNXIR--------',
Path Hrc,-ADR 91-3
PC Mtg 2/12/'+?
Pott Hra-Ord X
,'' Mtg 1/27/92
Pub Hra-Ord 8!
hpAC Ntg ,',an 16
Pub Hrq-TTM 4781,0,51.47
fi?AC Mtg-ran !3
10TAt. DUE ANDUR
.lit 1 R!;cii':35s ,=n,!!iG�!�-n+
+021 4892 1397 1. 222940 Bii28 221@4 882; Faser Luba for Cagier
MAL OtJE VENDOR --- ----
42.2.3
:3@.28
42.97
?.1 l+, :",6
3°0.80
'+92. as
1,163,78
:21:3.44
4@8.41
417,?4
739.21
1.181.4E
5, 382, 5;,
41,25
49.5a
0'.2(
59. 15
6`?.75
,A.60
6^.15
/?.Ba
526.2'_,
52.49
52.49
a t y it t r; d 9 ' u I' 4 +
59:46 l±fi;a3;ti'? 'rRr
i'tft!NT P Td -k)
PATCH G.i.' iht %h:;. ENTRY/:;ti I
E hat .t i...- AM I,± De; -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UBfili1n05 FCiuS!'ranit JFtinlf!iSFI
+021-k555-5521.
lie'
121,94
ie:ta+ 51;cs-De, 91
14.915,9;
222,94
101-4553-S h
1 20224E
11JO_ ri;t V:=Vi7;R--------;
14.915,64
K)tti? Rr?q-all ini;fitl4 ill, l:O .l
317.'+4
+225--4510-6412 051.92
1 23724E
01/33 02104
(381-1210 1. 287341±
01./2" 02/0;
9101
Tre Hirt-Ctv Ind Share
�,Ary,
10-'+240 2
02104
91A1
Tr:'q*-A-City Si,ar?
9.OM3
1 28734F
01/32 02104
10^3?
IN At DUE VENDOR --------:
19.3Gi.o2
!..A. Ca,lfrv-:!,:.ri}f`s Din-A±;Shiriff
i 20234F
)71i3t 02/04
129A
Curb S si,!:_xalk rarair
+021-4411-5 01 1 MW
01/21, 02/04
91510
Der. C(intratt Svc
3;4,574.02
111ML D!1E VENDO--------. 314,';74.02
!..A.Cntl,,ty ?W)Iic 'kriS utiWk
+021-k555-5521.
1 20234F
01/`.2 0210:;
1092!,
5trioinu/Marking
222,94
101-4553-S h
1 20224E
01130 02/24
15929
Si un ir.stal1atian
317.'+4
+225--4510-6412 051.92
1 23724E
01/33 02104
10932
Sign instUn-Brod/Rig Knl
956.81
X221 4'i55 5506
2 20234r
31/72 02/04
1.031
Sinn instln-)7B Blvd
119.16
+021-45;1-5SZ?
1 28734F
01/32 02104
10^3?
Rcad Mai.nt-N:!vem'wr
17,572.39
X021 '+5'" S-`•54
i 20234F
)71i3t 02/04
129A
Curb S si,!:_xalk rarair
19.';61.69
foal 4 W.-552';
1 25724E
0l/33 V104
1093?
6:itker. reaair N.ve�tier
3,129.44
X021-';555-', 04
2 20?3':F
3t/10 82/24
10915
11'sr,
'22.56
+981 is55'-5�1.7
1 MW
91/30 02%04
10936
Drain Fril.ity Mairft-Nnv
51116.75
t 20U,+F
51/32212/34
10937
Dabrfs r-+auval wOv ai)?r
7.235./2
Oat -4FY,-5510
1 2372�F
01/32 02104
1053?
Tree eaterina•Navem4er
1.621.19
1301-4s"A -1:559
1 23i2'iF
01/22 02/04
139,39
ire triiiinu. -Muv;aAD:?r
11325.91
+02i f,55',-5529
1 2M4F
01/30 02/0
10940
k.•eri RLate-wnt-Nave SEr
17,73j.93
`etj-4655-55rJ
2 2a231:F
a1./3a 32154
15941
Road Maitit-Nov*jiber
4,443.94
+021 451.0 55;;3
123224E
01/38 07!04
1oc,43
Ind kaste 5�ce-NoveaSer
511.01
TO 101. ---------
13,1±.9.21
i.,,t;,r;)t)nty hist, ;�tt„rnev LAIAis'Att
+02, 40'0-4021.
1 23224E
01.129 0210ti
DE.c Laval 5vc:±.
22".73
'fl - MAL OUC VENDOR --------:
W. 13
LA County Reu_ ktar
LAi R�t:nrdr
+331-'E3`
9 2094.
01 /2L VIVO
42.2 N
Frintc, of Candidte Stata,t
1,752.45
t±fk DUE V:_NDuR--------,
t.M2.45
l.at�t�5,:d)e 1.*st
i.3t�d5t:.il.'r•±
+141.41+1-5533
1 MW
0112'1 02/04
U65A
bFr Paint Dist 141
3.102,1^2
PJTAL DUE 'KND±1? --- ----:•
3.103.01
ark_
of
6 9
.31JIN *f 1M.F /92
V 0 U C
H E R R
1 z, R
D! 1L TNrt
I , . , , , ........
e2R4192
P
---------------------------------------------
Ti -t" R,"�T-Pf;.i INL
f R y /bi IF
- - - - - - — -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I IYo 1 c t
DKI'A IP ! IoN
A M LtN-1
DAZE eC K
. Le;IC-LIE' OF Ca, Citiel,
L El
QW -421e-4228
2 U2204C
@11H, 02/04
not
PIQ0 coml Hafldbooks
54 .13
TOTAL IME Y"NDUR ---------
Lewis C.flqravillfl Inc.
r a
+021-4@95-21.1.0
2 MW
010
T far Viptns,e F21 -t iv.L
17.32
T'All. DUE VFSIDOR --------
17.32
Mary
M
+081 3;78
2 202840
02/04
2628
Recreation Refund
23.02
100L OIJE VCNOGR --------- >
23 .03
+083-4216-47.28
3
01/29 02/64
hc,'cvlDa,.,iL Report
6,000.90
0104191 081fi8013P59
'101"AL PRUAID AMOUNT
h, 260.00
TWAIL DUE VENDOR --------
0.62
Ilarl"iflaCha
+081 4210 1202
3 MW el/lON
0112',' 02/04
91555
Minute Baok-Plna
244.46
IOIAL DIJE 'KNOOR --------
2414.46
Mirroai;e
irroa,)o
}081 4090-1200
2 MAC
CIA' 02104
085703
Som. Prvte,.tor5
55.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------- )
';5.36
Pixy
Mi llzt6
MI - lQc
I MW
01/2t 02104
Ri-1, mi -Candidate StatE.r:jt
74.65
I')fAL DUE VENDOR --------
714.65
+081 4?10 4828
1 2228'40
01125 02104
9MIC
Ping Cclq,l Mtq 1/1119?
51-8100
X111 -431'x,-',020
t 202340
01/?9 02/04
92d1,,81
PrIts & R,4c Kta liqM
162.03
+031-4553 400e
01124 010
92,;601
Trft I Trans ;tq 119192
314.00
TOTAL DUE V%ADCR --------
1 .3 , Don
Nanip'llaD
+021-3635
S MMA
WH 02/64
Rifund-Ca,,,didatt. StAtiri;4it
74.6;
TWAL DUE VEMOR --------
74.65
d
:146 81r:3
2
d j U 1, J k 4T
DdTNitiU.............
eo
V�AVA
p ri i 3
---------------------
HTCH Pu.i !K` NO
: ;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EN'. R Y 1 B F IN,140 i C�
IP(IA
AM3,UNI
DA i E
Nei Te"ll'u'll Oct i psCw_
Te hot
1021 4 434 220:'
i6 3
U;4qmter Main�
L .
249.6fi
10A ME V;A',')!'R ---------
orti.z. flv,pa.
+021-4�SJ 4128
3 2029,41
01124
044
Irk Coffir. Mt(,-Ja,,l
48,20
TONIL DUE --------
40.03
6 MW
01/21
0M4
Refund-Candidate C"late"rit
74.65
-101,111- LIE VENDOR --------
74.65
Par Ts?l Cellular
Pic Ts'l
+001-4034-21?S
I 20M
e1124
0?/04
Du, Cellular Svc.
54.6
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
'S4. 6- S
pal'oll. 11,11v11.is
NperP
f081-3635
2 2024A
01J28
@2/04
hfund-Can6ida',E, St at ffe.n t
74.65
(O(k LE V.'--NDjR --------
14.£)5
Paul,
P303
+021-363!,
3 MW
el/29,
e?lgq
RE,,'M-Candidate StAteigat
74.65
0 1 AL 0 1 j E V: --A 1) 0 R --------
65
Pavroll T-raot;fpr
Pavrnl Tr
el/2';'
01014
Payroll Transfer P('2
R,98x.00
02/04/4202/04/42an/92 �mlnp
T 0 1.4 L ?1RE P A i D AM L T
TUTAI DOE VENDOR ----------
0.00
i MAU,
01124
014
Permit
6,5?
TOTAL NE V,CADOR ---------
6.�2
*-;?tkv rash
FewyCash
I MW
el 12e,
02194
RecreaLinn refinds
17.9e
I ?MNA
K/28
02104
ALM-vallicle Maint
7.26
+001-4030 23?t,
I 2a?NA
KIM
2?194
Mo?tinc. rein,
7.36
101-A20-2320
I MNA
01/28
02/04
Mpytinq'l rpimb
16.93
tea 1-1:9'4.21.1t
1 20£04A,
01/2.1
02/x4
C (J. k - D r i n t i n 9 r e i t b
14.da
ltol.-14090-IM
I UA2NA
al/26
a2./e4
S 'j f3p l'i i? S
5?154
+021-'Oe--1222
1 200,
KIWI
5,10
109I-4290-217.9
1
al/26
a2iO4
;OM
foelAollle 23i'
__1
Olt /7i.
02,10L,
7.1 10
p v Cash
+081-4210 232':•
+0t1-it3`.,0 2:3;
gT'01-':51-i"5
+01-455:; 2375
ttv r'asn
+0x1-4038-1708
+00 i- y 038-2'37',
g00i-40'x5-1'?.8
+021-i:-095-2110
g0a� '+118-21?0
+021 4510-2375
.-1minx}. Rrn
t42?-L.b,I� 12'x,2
g681 +098 hZ?9
i'1ti58Y &4;1•i
+021-4096 13"
ti++ t "i ,i Dina,n1i Bar tgt
9f V Du C F. E R R E tS 7. s , E "n
.............+�1
t # t
J.I.S bl) L'AIC4 l.:.l'r.i :_y;R'i'7i;= itiiUi,_
i YC'.i i iti
0216',
,y 11 Vl;! D l
72.21-
1 2022=;F:
✓?;2?t
0210;
Planr�ir,o-a;etinus
4'.00
i •i�cc4A
al/f8
87x2'4
S�r.r ati,n 4} }�.
'°' '
1. 282244
01128
67104
R2cre<ttio",-me. r'tinos
15.05
1 ?07244
81/78
3?i8'+
Enri oning-.?;rtin+_a
11.60
1 227244
01/28
6?f04
public wk.s-tttetinu
17.00
Maint-Radar System
5:.23
01/29
TO(Al DILE VEVDUR ----------
x41.19
:?ttYf.J5i1
IOTA; DUE 'VENDOR --------;
131.148
2 20MiA
61128
07/04
sappli.Fs
2';.3:.3
2 1873'+A
b1r28
87/34
X1I - vehicle taint
4.5'5
2 2822 A
01/21
62/0;
Me?t ms
MR,
1 ?3F34A
81128
01/04
'Suprili .3
13.71
i 22784A
01128
02164
Certificate orintin4_
3.20
1 ?02044
01/28
02/04
5.45
1 202244
01128
621x4
Pub Wks - heetinos
18.62
10FA1- DUE VcXDUR---------)
96._2?
P ? tii;,,;R
1 2tMD1
41i2S
02/0'-;
Rinl cksi1312:'-namep7.atFs
5-:.t3 02/64/92 0880Z1?75►
1 287840
817'9
07/04
t.5o9.62 02/04/92 6062013258
IOTAt PNff 410 AMOUNT ----?
1,:,23.7`z
!0141- 111,E VEVDUR--------7
4.08
Pitr.?yBcro
2 227841'
0112`
02/0'+ 93A216
E:t!ti0 fni• PDStaq�' Machine
68.53
TOTAL ti11E V::NTJQi--------1
63.53
Pr:2ntieo
2 2828';E 61/1772
P E;1"s
+021 1232 i 2+;?840
t081 -7113-1E68 1 "_8'.B+;D
+001 ?110 l02+A 2 '"MD
R.F. C+;aa. "c?cia.lti:, 1611c:,r sc,?c
t001 4411-5-x01 2 227240
1081-4'+11-5481 .3 2E:231.i:
41'2`•.
0216',
Traffic Enor Book
72.21-
Tom D6E VaDGR--------;
12.26
6112;
02/04
A.4;V Ratirer nt Refund
3.01.8.69- 02/64/92 0222013241
011 i`9
G?184
hf i.rfa?nt C+mtrh
;3.818.+68 92/44/92 M'011261
011211
C?i0t
Retiremisnt Coritrih
2,65?.05 02/04/92 08080132'1
TOTAL P1+EPA.tD AMOU;tT ---->
2,!)"2. 05
TOTAL DUf VENDOR --------;
0.@'8
01/21;
0104 7315
Maint-Radar System
5:.23
01/29
0/04 1311
Taint -Radar Svst,:m
14.;s
IOTA; DUE 'VENDOR --------;
131.148
i
t V
i f D"a.401--
01/3::;9r
V 0 U C
H F R R F
6 S T EYR
OIJE [HRU
. . . . . . . . . .
. . .
VLk"Op, NAME
ANDOR 11).
I) I .
i X v0 BA f 1,,� '.10 , 11 NF NO .
N !j R
Y i f- I J'C'
I AVIJ I i1C
D E
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Rjd4c
Raft i 21mna
jafl Bacic snvic6
18.7b
TOTAL Dul VINDUR ---------
,".zdi 'vral :`.stats Info. REJA
2811 4?18'4212
I 20MA
01126
07/0
0315 S V ?;Q
Cnfitrart Fu:,,iE:t41-Mju-cjfj,,qj
452.5'1
TVAL DUE VEAriijR -----------
2021 4551-5223
1 20224E
WV,'
02/04
916462
hor Irmputiciris;
5,307.35
TOTAL DUE VBOUR ----------
5,°87.`-5
Rc,wialld, 1 dvaird
Fcwlandl-
7 222240
01/28
021'04
Refund-Ceididate Statkcit
71, . 65
01E V:-NDUR ---------
74. h5
S.G. Valley P'sil 1A Citic,
!"Ukority
202M
01125
OM4
MFkbvr mto
18.0 42/04/9'r" Mplqe,,^
TOTAL i PrI AID ANIAT
18.0
IUTN Dill VF,%D[.IR ---------
Su pibripl VIV rlribull�
!'We Dube
2011 2300"1010
5 70?840
1/2S
02104
5riYU0722
AR 9i-83 1/0/9?
46.92
6 20014C
01129
02/84
iqvi:10/56
Us 50519 M11-9 1!27!92
69.92
2021 4?18 ?115
9 MMC
0112:'
0/04
st,vtl0777
GPAC Mto 1/16/9?
7.64
S
4 2,N04C
sayfl-MI
Plib ATO -T1,111-22182
'36.12
t02i 4218 2115
10 MW
01/29
V/eli
5"ARK?
BPAC Mto 11,18-2121.
51.44
2291-4=15-2;15
11 7178'92
al./'E9
82/34
SUAI04S2,
PC 14fu CUP 91-14 2/12192
1.92
5 222040
81 /?Cl!
02IQ4
S-fVile-881.
P. -A 4zct- fl',jpf I of Intere,J
31.22
TUTAL VENDuR --------
31",2.36
I MM
011!21"
0104
1,1.792
Crosqnq Gaord Svc-Dn
4,754.62
TUT4L DJjE VE,4DI)R
2021-4010-2110
2 212840
01/29
02/0
partraits-miller
64.60
TUAL 011E VAIDUR -----------
96.63
i
t v of
D i
a n: ci n J Bar fff
RUN 150 0446 h1/38,'q
0 U
H E
6 E R
FAE
DA THR�l
.......
192
VENOM 19.
A. 1C -Nui. 1 N, f
-----------------------------
Bmu Poi aw.
------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ECRUba
1004,
wFAjpqL1-N
ANUC DEE col
-
Mr snw;y
sirhyedv
11018%411e
12%73=;1'
OQ4
7416
Statinfl-a!0
1181A211011
1 2vnc
01/29
82X
i910
stomrary suappi
*181-4090111@
2 20040
olq9
RpRy
7VA
paunuv Samos
IN. 74
:3 TVAC
0629
@Vh
AM@
76.'1§
tuTk DUE VENDOR ---------- %
315.19
.;1311
*NI - 4 SS�,-2126
Dec elect -Tri -c: Control
10 fAL P',E VENDOR --------
4,?56.3s
swjfli:affl Ca.
f 13,?, 53 t - 2 1 ? b
I 20204D
0/04
Dec Ej.p,.t Dist 13A
196A7
Si),10*rn 'I
f139-4539-21?6
I 2UND
OHN
Dec E&Lt DWI 131
161.02
TOTAL DOE VENDOR -------->
1168.02
Sufj-r.;Inn Ca.
S;)CiF;j i cilln
+Pj I -ti
1 2UND
OU29
=4
Dec Elea. D&I PI
6136
ICM L HE YOUR
63A6
21%
2084D
tli2(,'
e?/ti
Dec Ele:t-Maple Hill Prk
24S.0I
20204))
81129
0104
Dec rlet Suaiti,iq Pfk
701.18
1001-43:11 212!,
1 227E,D
e1i2v
02iO4
Dec FIv.-Sycafore Cyn prk
23'.98
T00L Dt.'.E V,.N.i)!,,R ---------
1'14.49
Ca. ,;,iron
ioia,=dison
+01-45SIS-2126
? 28204D
ling
07N4
Der. F&PIricMdu Nile
82.80
WFK HE WHOR
32.00
Trslirvce i5f
Qr:,
1001-71151845
1 ?PAC
03.19
OVN
SaT life Ins -21b
81 .58
Q81-2118-195
2 28r04C
01129
N/A
1-ile 111S Pry- ,-D
30.0
W51 NT VENDOR
44438
t y
1, i D i i
A " il , ,j Sar
RON TNT: tow own"?
V 3 U C
H E R R
E 6 i 9 T E R
Y
WE
Q K' Y 2
VLk%R KRE
VENXN 1P.
A i f,; 1 j.,1 T
BATCH P11 B&NI
VORDWY
LWATE
KgWAKS
AMG0 OME
----------------- -------------------
I -------------------------------------------------------------------
5i a t n 'Tri f I i fiu,n
5t a r:. R i; E q
0
3 2NND
Rln9
OwP
91 Saks Tm &IE:
0313 =692
TOTAL AMOUNT
14 .:43
!L11A1 DL11 VfNDOR ----------
1 232t4D
tliP
vpipw4
Larty Dir,11. Nme S-iL-E;igr
TOTAL DUE Y,,NDUR >
23.27
t, 22754P
Hn9
IPM
4NU2
FmFANqr
TorAL DUE VBDUR --------
15.15
Urban Vision
1413afivisin
Q31-4013-42,10
02/e4
12n
FIR Club at Firestorie
1.097.55
TVAL DOE VENDOR --------
Wallt)t Vly 'iit:,r Dist
WVVatz?rDi s
+13'4-453V 2126
2 25?54ll
91/29
02104
N)vjarl Water Dist x34'
fUTAL KE V.':N0,jR -----------
'124.15
wAnt Hy won 00A
WwAnus
+3ti-431.1-21?b
I 22254D
61.12v
02/04
N.'Y-Jari Water Paul Grow
51.4.75
X001-'4 1L. ?126
2 25704D
911124
P/h
Nov -3.3n Tatar Maple Hill
129.21
+2P1 4319 217x,
3 22224D
11/2"
32114
by -Jan Water Maple Hill
5610
1-O ML ME VBNR
WViatyrDis
S t-21?',
2 2VPD
6I129
VR4
kc -Jan Water Dist 136
2,048.01.
10NAL WWF. V�NDUR ----------
2,0411.81
Co.
'0stPlib
1 20246
MIN
62104
61.13531
CA Code PAINd ions
15.19
>
K5.19
0692
2 PUND 6111?0
617?"
IP7R,4
6297
CaA Pro"Heritage
751.0
TOML MA VOIN
151.0
*�* Cit, o� Diamvno Bax **'
R UN IMF; VUUCxER REGISTER
�li lKki......... .0/0/92
V�-y0A gAME n.
GAlCH P8.|lk9^g. E^8HY/Du; IxVDYCF [)p/0w AMK UNE C«���
_______---------- _______________________________________________________
l0T� yH���o -----'> 49.61.7.13
01 N' DUE -------'` ��,8L7.49
------> 5/3.43:1.62
*�` C� � ut Dzanuov 8af *`+
UK Tit: V96 8=9? VDUCH[R REGISlER
FUNU SU;MA8Y R EP0R[
DtIL lHkd......... .... 02/C,N97
bl� H."S y[S{E8 rb|\§'E
DrRiC/ PAY R�BPLN �VENljt EVLMI ROM MEW-
------------
------------------------------------------------------------
01Gm,,al Fund B1,. .8) s--.i.w.N 2.��\8� 49Y.4y».n�
��LU0 *���d � @704
` ' yon
1S�LA 1) 43M Fw; 5�� ��
' ' &N0.71
A'Tnm;it Fo \3B �8
' ' \`A�1.�8
2/:�away:d AV �+ Fu 9�� ��
'
14\U.oO 1141 Fuo:3 �^3 J6
^ '
T.p. F-inc;
/0/M. ------ ------ ------ ------------ ______ ______ ______ --------------
AU
_____AU �UND$ B3.43+.62 6x.44L*1 248.85 B7`/2/.76
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 13, 1991
L CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Grothe called the meeting to order at 7:09
p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management
District Board Meeting Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Lte. Muravez.
ROLL CALL: Commissioner Harmony, Commissioner Flamenbaum,
Commissioner Schey, and Chairman Grothe. Vice
Chairman MacBride was absent.
Also present were Community Director James
DeStefano, Associate Planner Robert Searcy,
Planning Technician Ann Lungu, City Engineer Sid
Mousavi, Deputy City Attorney Bill Curley, and
Contract Secretary Liz Myers.
MINUTES:
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by
C/Harmony and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the
Dec. 9, 1991
Minutes of December 9, 1991.
OLD BUSINESS:
CD/DeStefano reported that, as directed by the
Commission at the December 9, 1991 meeting
TTC/PC
regarding discussion of the Traffic and
Relationship
Transportation Commission's (TTC) relationship to
the Planning Commission in the Development Review
process, staff has attached, within the packet, the
ordinance utilized to create the TTC, and minutes
from the joint Council/TTC meeting held June 26,
1990.
CE/Mousavi, in response to C/Harmony's inquiry,
explained that the TTC, began developing guidelines
for projects that generate traffic, impacting
traffic operations within the City. The intent of
the guidelines was to provide guidance to
developers to conduct traffic studies that
demonstrate their needs, as well as provide the
appropriate mitigation measures. As this project
evolved, discussion came up as to when the TTC
would review these documents provided by the
developers, and the relationship between the TTC
and the Planning Commission. The document was
never intended to be used as a policy for that
relationship.
C/Flamenbaum indicated that it is appropriate for
the TTC to be given an opportunity to review
projects, relating to traffic matters, presented to
the Planning Commission. Unilaterally excluding
them from the review process does a disservice to
this Commission and the community.
Chair/Grothe, disagreeing with C/Flamenbaum, stated
that the Planning Commission has a very large
January 13, 1992 Page 2
charge on the transportation in the community. The
Commission should set all the guidelines, and work
with the City Engineer to assure that those
guidelines, for the entire City, are standardized.
The charge of the TTC is to develop the systems,
standards, and transportation for the whole
community at large. It would not be appropriate to
add another level of bureaucracy for reviewing a
specific site. He indicated, however, that he
would have no problem with sending Planning
Commission agendas to the TTC. ,
C/Schey stated that the TTC was formed to adopt and
review policy issues relating to public
transportation. Those policies are to be
implemented by the City Engineer in a technical
way, dealing with the professional reports received
on these projects. He concurred with C/Flamenbaum
that it may be useful to transmit information to
all of our committees and commissions for their
information, and injection of their expertise.
However, concurring with Chair/Grothe, he would not
want to create a committee to deal with technical
issues on a current Planning basis.
Todd Chavers, residing at 23816 Chanuk, Chairman of
the TTC, emphasized that the TTC does not want to
approve or deny traffic reports, but rather to have
the opportunity to comment on them as they respect
the policy and guidelines the TTC has established
in the past. We are not trying to add another
level of bureaucracy, but rather offer our input to
the Planning Commission. He further stated that
the Traffic Impact Study Guidelines was given to
the Commission for information purposes. It will
be passed on as a recommended policy item.
Don Gravdahl, residing at 23988 Minnequa, Vice
Chairman of the TTC, indicated that it is not the
intent of the TTC to dictate policy to Planning.
The TTC is merely requesting to be kept informed,
and to be given an opportunity to comment and give
input on traffic matters.
C/Flamenbaum suggested that a policy be established
whereby all Planning Commission agendas are sent to
the other Commissions, and that at least one copy
of the entire packet be sent to the Chairman of the
TTC.
C/Schey directed staff to transmit all
transportation related studies to the TTC for their
review, and to include any input from them in the
staff reports. It is also requested that the
January 13, 1992 Page 3
agendas, from all other commissions, be distributed
to the Planning Commission as well. The Commission
concurred with the direction given.
Chair/Grothe called a recess at 7:49 p.m. The
meeting was called back to order at 7:56 p.m.
CONTINUED CD/DeStefano addressed the Commission regarding the
PUBLIC HEARING: Development Review for the K -Mart revitalization
project located at 249 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. At
Development the time of the report, K -Mart had not submitted
Review 91-4 the additional information needed in order to
continue review of their project. Therefore, staff
is recommending that the project be tabled. When
the additional material is received, staff will
readvertise the project appropriately, and bring it
back to the Commission for consideration.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
C/Harmony inquired if it is necessary to have the
applicant's acquiescence to table the matter.
CD/DeStefano explained that the applicant was made
aware of the necessary continuation if the
materials were not provided to the Commission.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
C/Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to table the
matter to a date determined by staff.
TT 50519/ AP/Searcy addressed the Commission regarding the
DA 91-3/ request to subdivide a 2.3 acre site for
DR 91-2 condominium purposes, a Tentative Tract Map, a
Development Agreement, and a Development Review
application. At the conclusion of the November 25,
1991 public hearing, the Commission directed staff
to conduct a Cost/Benefit Analysis to determine the
appropriateness of the proposed condominium project
at that particular location. Subsequent to the
conclusion of the hearing, the applicant informed
staff that he wished to amend the project to a
Senior Citizen project, which maintains the
approximate same density, redesigns the interior of
the project, and reduces the parking and the
elevations. Staff is recommending that the
Commission table the project, direct staff to
renotice the public hearing to an appropriate date,
and direct staff to gather any information that may
be appropriate for the Commission's review of the
project.
January 13, 1992 Page 4
AP/Searcy, responding to inquiries made by the
Commission, briefly described some the various
tentative changes made to the project.
Chair/Grothe, with the consensus of the Commission,
directed staff to include the Cost/Benefit analysis
in the staff report when the project returns to the
Commission.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
CD/DeStefano reported that the applicant has
requested the matter to be postponed to the January
27th meeting. However, staff has recommended that
the matter be tabled to provide staff an
opportunity to analyze the drawings, received on
Friday, and to provide the Commission with a
Cost/Benefit or Fiscal Impact Analysis. Staff will
readvertize the matter appropriately, probably
around the middle of February of 1992.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
C/Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept
staff's recommendation, with the direction that the
Cost/Benefit Analysis, previously requested, be
done on this revised project.
PUBLIC HEARINGS: CD/DeStefano addressed the Commission regarding a
City initiated request to add a new Chapter 22.76
ZCA 92-1 to the Los Angeles County Code pertaining to
admission charge parties in residential zones.
Over the past several months there has been
discussion by the City Council, City Staff,
Sheriff's Department representatives, and members
of the community with respect to the fact that
"flyer parties" are becoming a problem in several
neighborhoods within the community. These parties
are advertized by means of flyers, occur when a
parent or guardian is not home, and charge an
admission fee of either food, alcoholic beverages,
or payment of a fee. The purpose of the Ordinance
is to prevent and/or diffuse flyer parties in
residential zones in the City of Diamond Bar. On
December 17, 1991, the City Council adopted an
Interim Ordinance pertaining to admission charge
parties in residential zones. The Interim
Ordinance will remain in place for a minimum of 45
days and is likely to be extended in order to
permit the adoption of Zoning Code Amendment No.
92-1. Staff recommended that the Commission adopt
the attached Resolution recommending approval of
ZCA 92-1 which amends the existing County Code by
January 13, 1992 Page 5
adding Chapter 22.76 pertaining to admission charge
parties in residential zones.
C/Flamenbaum requested that the item be tabled to
the next meeting to allow the Commission sufficient
time to review the ordinance. He requested that
the Commission receive the agendas in a more timely
manner.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
Lte. Mike Muravez, from the Walnut Sheriff Station,
stated that the purpose of this Ordinance was to
eliminate a problem wherein parties conducted in
residential areas, charging admission, advertized
via "flyers", and bringing in a large volume of
persons and traffic into the residential area. The
parties cause some peripheral problems that usually
drains the manpower, and disrupts the peace and
tranquility of such residential areas.
Lte. Muravez, in response to a series of inquiries
from the Commission, made the following comments:
within a 6 month period, there have been about 10
to 12 parties conducted; the manpower needed varied
from about 2 officers to as many as 25; for
enforcement purposes, the Ordinance does not
infringe upon normal activity in a residential
zone, but provides that people participating in a
commercial venture in a residential zone are
subject to enforcement; the Ordinance makes the
activity illegal, therefore enforcement action can
be taken when such parties begin; civil remedies
can be used for long term knowledge that such
activities are going on, or if the persons
persisted in having these activities, then civil
remedies could be sought to restrain them from any
future activities; the Ordinance is perceived as a
technique to prevent a dangerous action before it
occurs; and most of the time the parties are given
purely for commercial reason.-
C/Harmony, having misgivings with the language of
the Ordinance, stated that it opens itself for
interpretations that are not specifically related
to "flyer" parties, and preventing a clear and
present dangerous situation. He noted that the
definition of an "admission charge", a tangible
benefit monetary or otherwise, and the definition
of "party", 3 or more persons meeting together for
social, recreational, or amusement purposes, would
include a lot of categories that are obvious
January 13, 1992
Page 6
exceptions, such "Wine Tasting Parties", functions
occurring at Churches, and so forth. The Sheriff
Department already has the authority to go after
situations that present a clear and present danger,
and to seek injunctions against repeated actions.
Lte. Muravez, in response to Chair/Grothe,
explained that, with the Interim Ordinance, any
party brought to our attention, the Sheriff
Department would contact those persons, tell them
about the law, and check early on to make sure the
law was being obeyed. This action has a deterred
effect for those that wanted to have a commercial
venture.
DCA/Curley, in response to C/Harmony's concern,
stated that his office believes that the current
structure of the Ordinance is both constitutionally
firm, and able to be reasonably interpreted. There
is no way to construct a manageable ordinance to
define virtually every aspect that could happen.
However, if the Commission so desires,the Ordinance
could be further refined.
C/Schey inquired how the City's ordinances
presently address commercial ventures in
residential zones, in general.
DCA/Curley stated that, generally, what's not
permitted in a zoning ordinance is prohibited. The
question arises when an activity is done that is
not expressly prohibited.
C/Schey, concurring with C/Harmony, stated that he
has no problem with someone having a party, even if
they charge admission, as long as it is not unruly.
He stated that he does not see the purpose of the
Ordinance.
C/Flamenbaum concurred with C/Harmony in terms of
the ambiguity that is found in this Ordinance.
Acknowledging the need for some regulation for
"flyer" parties, he suggested that the Ordinance
contains a definition of a "flyer" party, how it
ties together with the admission charge, and
perhaps state, by name and type, organizations that
should be excluded.
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, and seconded by
C/Harmony to table the matter for two weeks, with
direction to staff to amend accordingly.
C/Schey stated that he is leery of ordinances that
are drafted to address a problem, but necessitate
January 13, 1992
Page 7
clarification of all the aspects of that problem
that you don't want to regulate.
Agreeing with C/Schey, C/Harmony withdrew his
second to C/Flamenbaum's motion.
Chair/Grothe stated that he is in concurrence that
the Sheriff Department, using good judgement,
should be given the opportunity to break up some of
these functions, and prior to them happening. He
suggested that a clause could be included that the
Ordinance expires after a time for review.
C/Schey indicated that he is not convinced that it
is legitimate for the Sheriff Department to take
action prior to a problem erupting.
Chair/Grothe seconded C/Flamenbaum's motion to
table the matter, with direction to staff to amend
accordingly.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: F 1 a m e n b a u m a n d
Chair/Grothe.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Schey and Harmony.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MacBride.
The Motion FAILED for lack of a majority.
DCA/Curley advised that if the Commission desires
no further action, the lack of approval is a
denial. That denial will be the recommendation.
Upon discussion, the Commission concurred to take
no further action, and that the lack of approval is
a denial.
CONTINUED AP/Searcy addressed the Commission regarding the
PUBLIC BEARING: request for night club/live entertainment to be
located at 21671 Gateway Center Drive, Gateway
CUP 90-70 Corporate Center. The Planning Commission approved
the extension of time requested August of 1991, and
directed the applicant to provide specific types of
live entertainment, and the proposed locations
within the restaurant. Staff has received the
requested information and has contacted local
agencies and other communities in order to
determine appropriate mitigation measures for this
type of use. Staff recommended approval of the
night club use (live entertainment in
establishments with occupancy in excess of 200
persons) with a condition of approval that the
applicant obtain all licenses from the Los Angeles
County Department of Business Licensing. AP/Searcy
pointed out to the Commission the changes made to
conditions #11 and #16.
January 13, 1992
-CA 91-5
Page 8
C/Flamenbaum requested that this item to be tabled
pending early delivery of the agenda. He requested
the following changes to the conditions: reword
item 5.1 to indicate that the approval is granted
for a restaurant, and that the usable space is 9865
sq. ft.; that the approval is also granted with
roof top level assembly and dining area for which a
maximum of 440 sq. ft. is permitted; add a new
item. to 5.1, specifying that the total occupancy
is to be 285 for the entire structure, and not just
the restaurant; and amend item 5.3 to provide, to
the maximum extent possible, that the parking and
entryway to the structure permit ease of entry to
the elderly, the infirmed, and the handicap.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
C/Flamenbaum and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept
staff's recommendation, with the modifications to
the conditions as recommended by C/Flamenbaum and
staff.
PT/Lungu reported that on December 9, 1991, at a
noticed public hearing, staff presented a final
draft tree preservation ordinance to the Commission
for review. A subcommittee of two Planning
Commissioners, C/Schey and VC/MacBride, were
selected to deal with the issues of heritage trees,
replacement standards, and civil remedies.
PT/Lungu reviewed the decisions made by the
subcommittee regarding the three issues, as
indicated in the staff report. Staff recommended
that the Commission adopt a Resolution, with
additions resulting from the subcommittee meeting,
recommending that the City Council approve the Tree
Preservation Ordinance. Furthermore, it is
recommended that the language, "The Director, in
his/or her discretion, shall refer the decision to
the Planning Commission in the event, that such
application is in conjunction with the
discretionary approval over which the Planning
Commission has jurisdiction.", should be inserted
to subsection 22.56.2110 as a new addition after
subsection H.
CD/DeStefano explained that this addition would
allow the Director to forward the application to
the City Planning Commission for review. It is
staff's opinion that applications for discretionary
approval involving the removal of trees, should be
January 13, 1992 Page 9
reviewed by the Commission, including the removal
of any Oak, Walnut, Sycamore, or Pepper trees.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Don Schad complimented the Commission and staff on
their job in developing the Tree Ordinance.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by C/Harmony
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Ordinance as
drafted, with the inclusion of the Director's
discretion to send nondevelopment related permits
to the Commission for their review, and the
inclusion of provision mandating that tree removal
permit that relate to development permits, under
the Commission's discretion, be mandatorily brought
with the balance of the package.
CD/DeStefano reported that these independent
applications are all in consideration of future
development within the Country Hills Towne Center.
One application seeks approval for a single story
5080 sq. ft. Goodyear Service Center. The second
application seeks approval of a 2800 sq. ft.
Speedee Oil facility and the subdivision of lot #15
into two land uses: one for retail purposes, and
the other for drive-thru restaurant purposes.
AP/Searcy presented the issues surrounding the
Goodyear Service Center, as indicated in the staff
report.
Chair/Grothe called a recess at 9:25 p.m. The
meeting was called back to order at 9:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CD/DeStefano suggested that the Commission either
review the application for Development Review 91-3
DR 91-3 and
(Goodyear Service Center), and the application for
CUP 91-12/
CUP 91-12 and Development Review 91-5 (a land use
DR 91-5
division on a development pad, and a Speedee Oil
Lube and Tuneup Facility), independently, or to
take both items, discuss the issues surrounding the
Country Hills project pertaining to both
applications, and then, at the conclusion of the
discussion, take action on each item independently.
Chair/Grothe, with the consensus of the Commission,
agreed that since both applications have similar
uses within the Center, it would be acceptable to
combine the issues for discussion.
CD/DeStefano reported that these independent
applications are all in consideration of future
development within the Country Hills Towne Center.
One application seeks approval for a single story
5080 sq. ft. Goodyear Service Center. The second
application seeks approval of a 2800 sq. ft.
Speedee Oil facility and the subdivision of lot #15
into two land uses: one for retail purposes, and
the other for drive-thru restaurant purposes.
AP/Searcy presented the issues surrounding the
Goodyear Service Center, as indicated in the staff
report.
January 13, 1992 Page 10
PT/Lungu presented the issues surrounding the land
use division and the Speedee Oil facility, as
indicated in the staff report.
DCA/Curley advised the Commission that underlying
the site plan is a parcel map. The County Code, as
adopted, speaks to a form of development called a
Lease Project, which foresees more than one
structure being put on a parcel with the intent
that they be rented out. There are certain
conditions within this Lease Project .that would
require parcel maps, if the projects falls within
one of the categories stated. In this instance,
there is not enough information to determine
whether or not a subdivision map will be required.
CD/DeStefano stated, since the Goodyear Auto
Service Center project may cause an impact in terms
of noise to the adjacent residential development by
possibly increasing the noise level that already
exist, staff is recommending that a sound study be
provided by the applicant for the staff's and,
ultimately, the Commission's consideration. In
regards to the Speedee Oil project, the sign
review, and the land use division of property on
the mention pad, staff recommended that the
Commission take action to approve those items.
AP/Searcy, in response to various questions from
the Commission, made the following comments: if the
Commission desires, conditions could be made to
mitigate the noise level; the noise level
determined was taken from the information existing
in the draft General Plan; if both projects are
approved, they would have 43 parking spaces over
the minimum required; the County of Los Angeles
granted the Krikorian Theater and the Center a
shared parking agreement; lighted parking is
already provided at the rear of the Center; as part
of the conditions for the Speedee Oil project,
additional signage is incorporated to direct
patrons to realize that there is parking in back of
the Center; and there is now security mandated on
the premises 5 or 6 days of the week.
Mark Wieman, executive vice president and chief
operating officer of Landsing Pacific Fund, the
owner of the Center, briefly reviewed the history
of the development of the Center project. The
three projects would generate tax revenues, create
some 45 jobs, and attract new traffic which would
act as a destination use to the Center and generate
traffic that would benefit the existing uses.
January 13, 1992 Page 11
Jim Taylor, representing the Wolff Company, the
applicant, stated that they are available to answer
any specific questions.
Robert Kradek, executive vice president of
operations for Speedee Oil, discussed the nature of
the Speedee oil operation. He described the
business to be clean, quiet and well maintained.
Jim Taylor indicated that, in regards to the
conditions contained to the Resolution associated
with the CUP for Speedee Oil, they do not take any
exceptions to the conditions contained in the staff
report, and the conditions of approval in the
Resolution. In regards to the concern to the
possibility of parcelizing the project, he stated
that they would not object to having a condition
stating that parcelization must occur, and be
approved by the City, prior to the issuance of any
permit.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Ken Demerot, residing at 22136 Steeple Chase, owner
of Alta Ski & Sport, commented that he would like
to see the Center continue to grow.
Bill Thackery, owner of the Little Professor,
concurred that the businesses proposed would assist
in attracting new customers and benefit the Center
and the City.
Robert Gannon, residing at 2641 Rising Star Dr.,
opposed the Goodyear project because the air impact
wrenches will increase the noise level and impact
the community. He opposed the Speedee oil facility
because of the following reasons: it is too close
the theater, and will take up too much parking; the
fumes from the smog tests will impact the
community; because of it's location, there may be a
blind spot coming in from Fountain Springs; the
noise level will increase and impact the community;
parking will occur on the street; and there is a
present danger to pedestrians because there is no
walkway from the driveway to the pads.
Larry Pinkleman, residing at 2670 Crooked Creek,
complained that traffic is already bad, within the
community, because of the theater. He stated that
he has had trouble from the bad element attracted
to the theater.
Brian White, residing at 21361 Hidden Pines, made
the following comments: the parking issue should
January 13, 1992
Page 12
be addressed because the
during the evening and
weekends; the ambient noise
north of Diamond Bar Blvd,
and a detailed traffic
requested.
lots are already full
matinee shows on the
level should be judged
closer to the project;
analysis should be
Herbert Porter, executive vice president of the
Wolff Co., stated that a detailed traffic analysis
was already conducted not only for the present uses
of the Center, but for all of the proposed uses as
well. Furthermore, assuming that all of the
proposed uses of the Center has been permitted, the
Center has 1053 parking spaces available, and the
required parking spaces is 933.
Joe Faust, with the firm of Austin and Faust,
stated the following: an analysis of the trip
generation of the site indicated that there would
be a very nominal change to the level of service on
Diamond Bar Blvd; there is a surplus of 50 or 60
parking stalls available after estimating it at a
worst case basis; because of the projects, there
will be displaced parkers of movie goers, however,
since there is a surplus of parking stalls
available, it is not foreseen to be a problem;
there is plenty of parking in the rear of the
Center; time limits and restrictions could be used
to combat parking on the street; the Speedee Oil
will generate an actual increase of about 80 trips,
not the 300 we allowed for; the total trip rate
increase will be about 3500 trips a day when the
Center is fully built out, and in a flourishing
economy; and the retail generation trip rate of
auto related services is much less than standard
retail.
C/Harmony stated his concern for the concentration
of traffic and parking at one end of the Center.
He also stated his concern for having two fast food
restaurants adjacent to one another.
Ken Anderson, residing at 2628 Rising Star, opposed
the projects for the following reasons: it will
increase traffic in the Fountain Springs entrance,
and there is already an overflow of traffic in that
area; both businesses will produce traffic, noise,
air pollution, and exasperate an already bad
situation; the streets will be blocked because of
the oil and stocking trucks; and traffic is already
saturated on the north side. He requested that the
Commission use common sense when considering these
issues that impact the homes just a few feet away.
January 13, 1992 Page 13
Robert Gannon noted that the delivery trucks will
have problems turning, if parking in the rear of
the Alpha Beta store is encouraged. He further
questioned the wisdom of allowing two drive thru
restaurants next to one another.
Bob Kradek summarized the following points
regarding the Speedee Oil facility: air impact
wrench compressors will not be used; the oil
delivery trucks normally arrive once a month; the
trucks used are not 18 wheelers, but bobtrucks; and
very little parking spaces will be taken by Speedee
Oil.
Brian White, pointing out that LA County standards
were used to determine the parking requirements,
stated that Diamond Bar can either seek to set
those same standards or set a higher standard and
expect more for residential communities.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
C/Flamenbaum suggested that the Commission first
take action on the Goodyear project.
AP/Searcy recommended that the Goodyear project be
continued to the first week in February to allow
staff time to review the noise study submitted.
The applicant concurred to the continuance to the
first meeting in February of 1992.
Chair/Grothe stated that he dislikes the following
in regards to the Goodyear project: the blank
stucco wall; the creation of an alley behind the
project; creating a situation with the parking out
front; creating a situation where all the doors are
facing the street and the facing the residences,
sending all the noise into the residences.
C/Harmony concurred with Chair/Grothe's
architectural comments.
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by
C/Schey and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the
Goodyear matter to the February 8th meeting.
C/Schey inquired if the application to separate lot
#15 is a request to build two buildings as opposed
to one.
DCA/Curley explained that the existing lot #15 was
permitted by the original CUP. The site plan
indicates a restaurant, but the resolution itself
January 13, 1992 Page 14
shows retail/commercial or restaurant. It is
unclear whether those two uses are one structure,
or two separate freestanding structures. The mere
concept of allowing two uses on the pad is a
separate issue as to how those uses are ultimately
implemented. . In regards to the issue of
parcelization, there should be a provision in the
code that bears further scrutiny, or alternatively,
condition a minimum of leaving it up to the
Planning Director, or City Engineer, to determine
if parcelization is required pursuant to the code.
C/Flamenbaum, noting that customers of the Speedee
Oil would either park in the lot, and walk across
two roadways to enter the office, or park in the
Speedee parking lot and walk across the exit side
of the bays to inquire about service, questioned if
this design would expose the City to potential
liability if someone were to be hit.
DCA/Curley stated that he sees no exposure to the
City on approving a site plan and the CUP.
C/Schey noted that the Commission does have the
ability, as one of the issues of a CUP, to mandate
changes to the site plan, if deemed appropriate.
C/Flamenbaum made the following comments to the
Speedee Oil project: reverse the building by 180
degrees for safety purposes; look into the option
of keeping the doors closed; look into the option
of some kind of exhaust collector system, with
associated scrubber attached to the system; the
wall should be enhanced by some sort of vegetation
to make it look attractive; add a pedestrian
pathway to the east side of the proposed Speedee
Oil facility; the pathway should permit, for
visibility purposes only, clear entrance into the
parking area behind the structure; add pedestrian
crosswalk from the theater to the Speedee facility;
and remove the wording "drive-thru restaurant" on
lot #15.
Chair/Grothe stated that he would like further
information on the issue of the shared parking
concept. He requested an analysis of number of
parking spaces and their present pattern of use.
He made the following comments: dislikes the roll
up doors; dislikes the location on the site;
concerned with lighting; there should be a walkway
for pedestrians going into the Center; and there
should be further review if the location of the
project is creating a blind spot.
January 13, 1992
Page 15
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by
C/Schey and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the
matter to the first meeting in February of 1992
pending additional information pursuant to the
aforementioned issues.
INFORMATIONAL
CD/DeStefano informed the Commission that the
ITEMS:
January 21st workshop between the Planning
Commission and the City Council has been postponed
to March 24, 1992. He reminded the Commission that
the Planners Institute is scheduled on April 9 -
li, 1992, in San Diego.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
C/Flamenbaum requested that staff deliver the
packet no later than the Wednesday before the
meeting. The Commission concurred.
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion was made by C/Flamenbaum, seconded by
C/Schey and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the
meeting at 12:21 a.m.
Respectively,.
I'
J m s DeStefan
Secretary/Planjing•Commission
Attest:
Jack Grothe
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
. AGENDA REPORT
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1992
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102
AGENDA NO.
SUMMARY: Bryan Stirrat and Associates have requested approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No.
22102 for a minor subdivision to create two (2) lots from one (1) 4.39 acre parcel, located at
1575 S.Valley Vista Drive, in the Gateway Corporate Center. In response to the action of City
Council at the January 21, 1992 meeting, a resolution of denial has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution of Denial for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 22102.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notificyation
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No
Which Commission? Planning Commission
5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: Engineering
R IEWED BY:
/&"111",
Robert L. Van Nort errence L. Belanger JVnes DeStefano
City Manager Assistant City Manager Community Development Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102
ISSUE STATEMENT:
At the January 21, 1992 meeting the City Council conducted a public hearing
and expressed concerns pertaining to TPM 22102. The Council directed staff
to prepare a Resolution of Denial for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Denial for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 22102.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND:
Bryan Stirrat and Associates are requesting a Tentative Parcel Map for a
minor subdivision to create two (2) lots from one parcel for property located
at 1575 S. Valley Vista Drive.
The minimum lot size allowed in the Gateway Corporate Center is .99 acres
which is stated in the Gateway Corporate Center Guidlines. The Council's
concerns focused around the size of Lot No. 2 which will be .77 acres and its
relationship to the rest of the Gateway Corporate Center.
PREPARED BY:
An J. Lijffigu,Pi,g Technician
Attachments:
City Council Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 22102, A REQUEST TO DIVIDE A 4.39 ACRE
PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS AT 1575 VALLEY VISTA
DRIVE WITHIN THE CM-BE-U/C ZONE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) Bryan Stirrat and Associates has filed an
application for a Tentative Parcel Map described above in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Tentative Parcel Map Application is referred to as the
"Application."
(ii) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was
established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California. Thereafter, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 14 (1990), thereby adopting
the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of
Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code, as
amended, contain the Development Code of the County of Los
Angeles currently applicable to development applications,
including the Application, within the City of Diamond Bar.
(iii) Because of its recent incorporation, the City of
Diamond Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, action
was taken on the Application, as to General Plan consistency,
pursuant to the terms and provisions of California Government
Code Section 65360.
1
(iv) On December 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of
the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on the subject matter of the Application and, upon conclusion of
said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its
Resolution recommending approval of the Application to this City
Council.
(v) On January 21, 1992, this City Council conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the Application and concluded said
hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
(vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
City Council during the above -referenced public hearing,
including written staff reports, verbal testimony and the record
of the Application, this City Council hereby specifically finds
as follows:
(a) The Application pertains to Lot 13 of Tract
30379, consisting of approximately 4.39 acres within the Gateway
Corporate Center - Diamond Bar. The site is located at 1575
Valley Vista Drive and is zoned CM-BE-U/C (Commercial
E
Manufacturing - Billboard Exclusion - Unlimited Contract Zone)
(the "Site" sometimes hereinafter in this Resolution).
(b) On October 17, 1989, this City Council
adopted its Resolution No. 89-103 ratifying and reconfirming the
"Design Guidelines" applicable to the Gateway Corporate Center -
Diamond Bar.
(c) The Gateway Corporate Center, as described in
the Design Guidelines, is contemplated to be a mixed use office,
research and development and commercial center within the City
consisting of approximately 225 acres of land. The lots
comprising the Gateway Corporate Center - Diamond Bar are
contemplated to be relatively large lots and, specifically, the
portion of the Gateway Corporate Center - Diamond Bar within
which the Site is located is designated for "Corporate Sites" for
high quality office and related uses for major corporate
entities.
(d) The Application as submitted would contradict
the goals and objections of the proposed General Plan and the
Design Guidelines applicable to the Site and would promote
detrimental conditions to the persons and properties in the
immediate vicinity of the Site insofar as it would create a lot
consisting of less than .99 acres. The small size of such a lot
would create a virtual remnant of the Site and would be out of
character with the properties within the Corporate Sites area of
the Gateway Corporate Center - Diamond Bar.
3
(e) The design of the Application is not
consistent with the proposed General Plan and the Master Plan for
the Gateway Corporate Center - Diamond Bar which envisions an
integrated, cohesive development within the Gateway Corporate
Center - Diamond Bar.
(f) The Application, if approved, would create a
lot which would not be physically suitable for either the type of
development or the proposed density of the development as
envisioned by the Design Guidelines.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
City Council during the above -referenced public hearing, and upon
the specific findings of fact as set forth above, this City
Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) The Application is not in conformance with
the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan and the
Design Guidelines for the Gateway Corporate Center - Diamond Bar
and the codes of the City of Diamond Bar.
(b) Pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code § 65360, this City Council hereby finds and
determines as follows:
(i) The City of Diamond Bar is proceeding in
a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Plan.
(ii) There is a reasonable probability that
the Application proposed will be inconsistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied.
4
(iii) There is a probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted General Plan
if the Application as proposed were approved and determined to
ultimately be inconsistent with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth
herein, this City Council hereby denies the Application described
herein.
5. The City Clerk hereby is directed to certify to
the adoption of this Resolution and to forward a certified copy
thereof, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Bryan
Stirrat and Associates at its address of record as set forth in
the Application.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of February, 1992.
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond
Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed,
adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar held on the 4th day of February, 1992, by
the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
N110111RESOPM M 6.8.1 5
City Clerk -of
City of Diamond Bar
�ECEI E-�
BRYAN A. STIRRAT 6 ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ANO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
February 4, 1992 JN 9007
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley Drive - Suite 100
Diamond Bar, California 91765-4117
RE: POSTPONEMENT ON ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING
DENIAL OF PARCEL MAP #22102 (S.E.M.A.) - LOT 13, TRACT 39679,
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER
------------------
Gentlemen:
Please consider this letter as a request for postponement of adoption of the above -
captioned resolution. As agent for the owner of the property under consideration, we are
requesting this postponement to allow additional time to determine, analyze and respond
to City Council concerns.
Prior to the January 21, 1992 City Council meeting, the owner and it's agent had no
indication from either Planning Staff or City Council that there were any issues pending
and/or unresolved. During the open public hearing, no opposition to the proposal was
voiced. It was after the public hearing was closed that there was indication given that there
were concerns.
The applicant respectfully requests the opportunity to identify concerns, work with City
Planning Staff to resolve, and re -address the City Council at the first available council
meeting in March.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of S.E.M.A.,
Richard M. Genzel, P. E.
Chief Engineer
c: C. Blum - S.E.M.A.
(9007L204)
1360 Valley Vista Drive • Diamond Bar, CA 91 765 • (714) 660-7777 • FAX (714] 860-8017
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 REPORT DATE: January 31, 1992
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
TITLE: Installation of "Deer Crossing" signs on Grand Avenue.
SUMMARY: On January 21, 1992, the City Council was informed that deer have been visible and may use
Grand Avenue as a crossing, near the Golden Springs Drive intersection. In order to warn motorists of deer
Presence in the area, it was suggested that the. City install a "Deer Crossing" sign. According to the Walnut
Sheriff Station and the California Highway Patrol, accidents which involve deer have not been recorded at that
location. The Department of Fish and Game has not identified the area as a deer passage, although deer may
be present in the area.
RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the City Council deny the request to install "Deer Crossing"
signs on Grand Avenue, near the Golden Springs Drive intersection.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:X Staff Report
— Resolution(s)
— Ordinances(s)
— Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
— Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X
by the City Attorney?
—Yes No
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed)
Majority
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
— Yes X No
Which Commission? N/A
—Yes X No
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
—Yes X No
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
41! 6
Terrence L. Belange
Assistant City Manager
Sid 1. Mousavi
Public Works Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992
TO:
Honorable
Mayor and
Members of the City Council
FROM:
Robert L.
Van Nort,
City Manager
SUBJECT: Installation of "Deer Crossing" signs on Grand Avenue, near
Golden Springs Drive
ISSUE STATEMENT
A request to install "Deer Crossing" signs on Grand Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council deny the request to install "Deer
Crossing" signs on east and westbound Grand Avenue, near the Golden Springs
Drive intersection.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The above recommendation has no financial impact on the City's 1991-92
budget.
BACXGROUND
The hills and slopes in the City of Diamond Bar have been known to function
as habitats for the roaming deer population in the City. Although
residential and commercial construction has forced deer to adjust and
relocate their available habitats, the deer remain and continue to be seen by
Diamond Bar residents in various areas. on several occasions, residents have
observed deer as they enter their properties or attempt to cross city
streets.
On January 21, 1992, the City Council was presented with a request to install
"Deer Crossing" signs due to vehicular accidents which involved deer on Grand
Avenue.
DISCUSSION
The Walnut Sheriff Station confirmed that there were no recorded accidents
which involved deer. This confirmation was based on accident records which
date from the City's incorporation date of April 18, 1989 to the present.
Prior to incorporation, Diamond Bar was monitored by the California Highway
Patrol (CHP), Ontario Station. According to Ontario Station's records,
accidents which involved deer have not been reported either.
Page Two
"Deer Crossing" signs
January 31, 1992
As stated previously, the City of Diamond Bar provides habitat for deer, in
various areas throughout the community. The southeast quadrant of the Grand
Avenue and Golden Springs Drive intersection has not been identified as deer
passage by the Department of Fish and Game. However, it may be that there is
habitat that shelters deer. Construction in the general area has become a
deterrent to the deer population to find habitat. Deer may attempt to cross
streets such as Grand Avenue and/or Golden Springs Drive. According to the
Department -of Fish and Game, it is mostly during the early morning and late
evenings that deer roam and forage, which may involve crossing City streets.
The Pomona Humane Society, which is called upon to remove deceased animals
Off City streets, report that no deceased deer were picked up within the City
of Diamond Bar, in the month of January, 1992. As for deceased deer prior to
January 1992, staff was unable to gather data since specific dates are
required in order recall records. Since the originator of the request was
not able to provide the City with specific dates, the Pomona Humane Society
was unable to furnish the City information regarding accidents, involving
deer, that have occurred on Grand Avenue.
The construction of the apartment complex on Grand Avenue and the proposed
development across from this property (Hospital Project) will increase
pedestrian and vehicular traffic volume on Grand Avenue. In addition, the
opening of Grand Avenue to the City of Industry has further increased the
traffic volume on Grand Avenue. As a result, deer crossings on Grand Avenue
and streets in the vicinity, if any presently exist at all, would not seem to
be reasonably foreseeable in the future.
PREPARED BY:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. S (v
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 REPORT DATE: January 31, 1992
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager
TITLE: Resolution of the City of Diamond Bar Setting Forth Personnel Rules and Regulations
Regarding the Payment of Salaries, Sick Leave, Vacations, Leaves of Absences, and Other Regulations
SUMMARY: This would amend Resolution 95-45C by modifying the language of Section 15 related to the
paying for accrued sick leave, which is in excess of the maximum allowable accumulated amount. Also, the
salary of the position of City Manager is adjusted to reflect an increase of 3.5 %. It should be noted that the
salary of the position of City Manager was not adjusted, in conjunction with the approval of the FY 1991-92
Municipal Budget, which is the customary practice. At that time, all other position classifications received
salary increases of 4.5%. It was determined at that time to defer the modification of the City Manager salary,
until the City Council had the opportunity to meet with and evaluate the performance of the City Manager.
The newly constituted City Council recently met with the City Manager to evaluate his performance and to
reaffirm and establish goals and objectives. The modification to the salary schedule reflects the agreement
between the City Council and the City Manager, regarding the adjustment to the City Manager's salary.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 90-45D, which
amends Section 15, Sick Leave and the salary of the City Manager position.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: _ Staff Report
x Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: None
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes x No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes x No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes x_ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
Rbbert L. Van Nort
City Manager
41441�_
J. SJ
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 90-45D
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH
PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT
OF SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES,
AND OTHER REGULATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR HEREBY RESOLVES,
ORDERS, AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary
to the efficient operation and management of the City that rules
and regulations be maintained prescribing sick leave, vacation,
leaves of absences, and other regulations for the employees and
officers of the City; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time to establish
comprehensive wage and salary schedules and to fix the rates of
compensation to be paid to officers and employees of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. COMPREHENSIVE WAGE AND SALARY PLAN
There is hereby established a Comprehensive Wage and Salary Plan
for employees of the City of Diamond Bar. The Comprehensive Wage
and Salary Plan is designed to provide for a fair and efficient
framework for the administration of wages and is based upon the
recommendations of the City Manager.
SECTION 2. SALARY SCHEDULE
Pursuant to Title , Article , Section of the Diamond Bar
Municipal Code, the Diamond Bar City Council hereby establishes the
salaries and the various full-time positions of the City of Diamond
Bar. As of June 15, 1991, compensation of the various classes of
Positions shall be as shown on Schedule A (attached).
SECTION 3. FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE GUIDELINES
New employees shall be hired at the entry step or any step at the
discretion of the City Manager and must successfully complete a one
year probation period. At the end of six months, the employee
will be given a performance evaluation and may be eligible for the
next step. Every year thereafter, employees shall be given a
performance evaluation and shall move to each successive step, so
long as the employees performance is satisfactory or above.
SECTION 4. PROBATION
In an effort to monitor newly -hired employees, the probation
period for newly -hired employees is one year.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page 2
SECTION 5. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Private automobiles are not to be used for City business except as
authorized. The City Manager may authorize such use at the
reimbursement rate equal to that set forth by the Internal Revenue
Service. Payments shall be based upon the most direct route to and
from the destination, and garage and parking expenses shall be paid
in addition to the current rate, upon submission of paid receipts.
SECTION 6. HEALTH,-- DENTAL ACCIDENTAL LIFE AND
DISABILITY INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
All full-time employees are eligible to receive group health,
dental, deferred compensation, life, unemployment insurance, and
long-term disability insurance within the City,s group insurance
carrier(s), with the administrative costs and premiums paid by the
City to a maximum established in Section 7 after 30 days of
employment. Dependents of employees are eligible for health and
dental insurance.
SECTION 7. FRINGE BENEFIT PACKAGE
An employee benefit program is authorized wherein all officers and
full-time employees have a choice of medical and/or fringe
benefits, as described in Section 6, in an amount not to exceed
$430 a month, paid by the City.
A. Employees, defined as Management, shall receive an additional
$30.00 per month to be applied as described in Section 6.
B. All employees shall participate in the Life Insurance and
Dental Insurance program. The City shall pay the cost of the
employee only in addition to the cafeteria program described
in Section 6 or Section 7(A). Monies in excess of the City�s
457 Plan, may be paid -off annually, during each December.
SECTION 8. PART-TIME HOURLY RANGE CHART
Hourly compensation for the various part-time positions shall be as
set forth in Schedule B (attached).
SECTION 9. STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT
All employees serve under the City Manager, pursuant to Government
Code Section 34856. Per Government Code Section 36506, nothing in
these rules and regulations shall be construed to provide employees
with any tenure or property interest in employment.
SECTION 10. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM - DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
The City of Diamond Bar shall pay the employee contribution of said
employee salary to the State Public Employee's Retirement System
(PERS) as deferred income.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Three
SECTION 11. PAY PERIODS
The compensation due to all officers and employees of the City
shall be on a bi-weekly basis.
SECTION 12. PAY DAYS
Warrants or checks in the payment of compensation shall be made
available by the City to employees and officers of the City on the
Friday succeeding the close of any given pay period. In an event
that pay day falls on a holiday, all warrants or checks in payment
of compensation shall be made available to the City employee on the
last work day preceding the holiday.
SECTION 13. WORKING HOURS AND OVERTIME
A. Eight (8) hours, exclusive of lunch period, shall
constitute a day's work for all full-time employees.
B. The official work week of the City of Diamond Bar shall
be five (5) working days of eight (8) hours each. It
shall be the duty of each Department Manager to arrange
the work of their Department so that each employee
therein shall not work more than five (5) days in each
calendar week. The City Manager may require an employee
to temporarily perform service in excess of five (5) days
per week when public necessity or convenience so
requires.
C. Whenever an employee, other than an Administrative/
Executive employee, shall be required to work overtime,
beyond 40 hours per week, such person shall receive
compensation for such overtime worked at one and one-half
(1-1/2) times the regular rate of pay, provided they have,
completed a full 40 hour work week.
D. Any full-time employee, other than an Administrative/
Executive employee, who is required to work on an
observed holiday beyond the regular 40 -hour work week,
shall be entitled to pay at the rate of two (2) times the
regular rate of pay provided they have worked a 40 -hour
work week.
E. There is nothing contained within this Section to exclude
the City from implementing a 4-10 Plan, at their option.
SECTION 14. ANNUAL VACATION
YEARS OF SERVICE
1 - 5
6 - 10
11 & up
VACATION ACCRUAL
10 days
15 days
20 days
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Four
SECTION 14. ANNUAL VACATION (con't)
A. A full-time employee, after twelve (12) months continuous
service with the City of Diamond Bar, shall be entitled
to a vacation of ten (10) work days per year to be
accrued at a rate of 3.08 hours per pay period.
B. Vacation time may be accumulated to a maximum of twenty
(20) days. The City Manager may approve vacation time
accruals exceeding twenty (20) days.
C. The total vacation allowance shall be computed to the
nearest whole day, based upon the number of full months
of City service.
D. In the event one or more municipal holidays follow
accumulated vacation leave, such days shall not be
charged as vacation leave and the vacation leave shall be
extended accordingly for those employees eligible for
such holidays.
E. An employee shall take vacation at such time during the
calendar year based upon due regard to the needs of the
employee's services and the work schedule.
F. Vacation shall be taken during the year following which
the vacation privilege has been earned.
G. The time set for the vacation of the City Manager shall
be subject to the approval of the City Council.
H. Employees who terminate shall be paid the salary
equivalent to all accrued vacation earned after one (1)
year of service has been completed, prior to the
effective date of termination.
I. All vacation requests shall be made at least five (5)
days in advance and prior approval must be given by
employee's supervisor and department head.
J. If an employee does not request time off in advance and
simply does not show up for work, the City Manager may
deny the use of vacation time or other benefit for the
time off, and said employee is subject to disciplinary
action including discharge.
K. Management employees, for the purpose of accrual, shall
be credited with previous municipal experience, up to
five (5) years of service.
SECTION 15. SICK LEAVE
A. Sick leave with pay shall be accrued by full-time
employees, at a rate of 3.08 hours per pay period.
B. After six (6) months of continuous service, the employee
is eligible to use sick leave.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Five
SECTION 15. SICK LEAVE (coni)
C. Unused sick leave may be accumulated to a maximum total
not to exceed 144 hours. Absence or illness may not be
charged to sick leave, if not already accrued and/or
accumulated.
D. Each full-time employee shall be paid one-half (1/2)
of
the unused balance of the annually accrued sick leave,
when the then annual
accrued during a given accrual year,
accrual results in sick leave in excess of the maximum
allowable accumulation of 144 hours. The sick leave
payout shall only apply to the amount which is in excess
of the maximum allowable accumulated amount of 144 hours.
Accrual of sick leave and buy-back will be calculated on
an annual anniversary date basis.
The annual accrued sick leave, over the maximum accumulation,
shall be paid once a year, at the employee's current wage at
the time of payment. Said payment is to be made on the first
day in December, or at such other time as the City Manager may
determine, at his/her absolute discretion, as appropriate.
After five (5) years of service, when an employee retires,
resigns or terminates in good standing, that employee will be
paid all accumulated sick leave at a rate of one-half
date) of of
the employee's current rate of pay /
termination.
E. Sick leave shall be allowed only in case of necessity and
actual sickness or disability of the employee, as
determined by the City Manager. In order to receive sick
leave with pay, the employee shall notify the department
head prior to or within two (2) hours after the time set
for beginning daily duties. The City Manager may, if
he/she deems necessary, require the employee to file a
Physician's Certificate or a Personal Affidavit stating
the cause of absence.
F. Sick leave shall not accrue to any employee for any month
in which that employee is on vacation, sick i leave, o
does not work a minimum of seven (7), eight (8 ) hour
working days in any one month or combination thereof.
G. If an employee does not show up for work and does not
call in within two hours, the City Manager may deny use
of sick leave for the unauthorized time off, and employee
is subject to disciplinary action.
H. Employees using all accumulated sick leave may be deemed
to have abandoned their employment.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Six
SECTION 16. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
When circumstances are such and the City Manager determines that
conditions warrant, three (3) paid bereavement leave days may be
granted in the event of death of a relative of a full-time
employee. "Relative" is defined as spouse, parents, children,
step -children, brothers, sisters, grandparents, grandchildren,
half-brothers, half-sisters, aunts, uncles, or other individuals
related by blood or marriage living in the same household as the
City employee.
SECTION 17. UNAUTHORIZED LEAVE
If an employee does not show up for work for three consecutive work
days without notifying said employee's supervisor or department
head, said employee shall be considered to have voluntarily
terminated employment with the City.
SECTION 18. ON-THE-JOB INJURY
Whenever a person is compelled to be absent from employment with
the City on account of injury arising out of or in the course of
that employee's employment as determined by the Workers'
Compensation Act, the employee may elect to apply pro -rated accrued
sick leave, if any, to such absence to receive compensation of an
amount of the difference between the compensation received under
the Workers' Compensation Act and that employee's regular pay, not
to exceed the amount of the employee's earned sick leave. An
employee in such instance may also elect to use any earned vacation
time in like manner after sick leave is exhausted. The City will
pay the employee up to three (3) days of that employee's regular
salary as it relates to an on-the-job injury and if not covered by
Workers' Compensation.
SECTION 19. JURY DUTY
If a full-time employee is called for jury duty, such person shall
receive regular pay while actually performing jury service,
however, any amount received by such employee as payment for
services as juror shall be reimbursed to the City. All mileage
paid to the employee as a juror shall not be considered as a
reimbursable item to the City.
Compensation for any full-time employee on jury duty shall be
determined and verified by the City Manager. It shall be the duty
of full-time employees requesting compensation under this provision
to obtain for and to present to the City Manager any and all
information as requested necessary to verify times and dates of
such employee's jury duty.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Seven
SECTION 20. ATTENDANCE
Full-time employees shall be in attendance at their work in
accordance with the rules regarding hours of work, holidays, and
leaves. Departments shall keep attendance records of all
employees. Absence of any employee without leave may result in
Possible disciplinary action including discharge.
SECTION 21. HOLIDAYS
A. Holidays which fall on Saturday shall be observed on the
preceding Friday, and holidays which fall on Sunday shall
be observed on the following Monday. Paid holidays are
only for the observed days.
B. The Diamond Bar's observed paid holidays are as follows:
1. New Year's Day (January 1)
2. Washington's Birthday (observed third Monday in
February)
3. Memorial Day (observed last Monday in May)
4. Independence Day (July 4)
5. Labor Day (observed first Monday in September)
6. Veteran's Day (November 11)
7. Thanksgiving Day
8. Day following Thanksgiving Day
9. Christmas Eve (December 24)
10. Christmas Day (December 25)
11. Floating Holiday (2)
SECTION 22. FLOATING HOLIDAYS
A. Each full-time employee is allowed two (2) floating
holiday (8 hours) per calendar year, January through
December.
B. Floating Holidays are not cumulative and must be used
during the above period or said employee will lose the
allocated hours.
C. Each employee must submit a request in advance, and
approval must be given by the employee's supervisor and
department head.
D. A full-time employee is eligible to use a floating
holiday after 30 days of continuous employment.
E. Floating holidays may be used in lieu of sick leave only
if all other benefit time has been exhausted.
SECTION 23. TRAINING PLAN
The City Manager and employees of the City are eligible to request
specialized training in the form of symposiums, special courses,
forums, etc., at City expense.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Eight
SECTION 24. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of absence without pay may only be granted by the City
Manager.
SECTION 25. RESIGNATION
An employee wishing to terminate employment in good standing shall
file a written resignation with the City Manager stating the
effective date and reasons for leaving, at least two (2) weeks
prior to the resignation. Failure to give such notice shall mean
the employee did not terminate in good standing, unless by reason
of hardship and upon that employee's request, the City Manager has
waived the two-week notice requirement.
SECTION 26. ANTI -NEPOTISM PROVISION
A. Relatives of those listed below may not be employed
anywhere in the City organization:
1. City Councilmembers;
2. Standing Board and Commission members;
3. Administrative/Executive employees of the City;
4. Employees of the City Manager's Department; or
5. Employees of the Personnel Department.
B. The employment of relatives within a department is
prohibited when they:
1. Perform joint duties;
2. Share responsibility of authority;
3. Function in the same chain of command; and
4. Work on the same shift at the same work site.
C. For business reasons of supervision, safety, security or
morale, the City may refuse to place one spouse under the
direct supervision of the other spouse.
D. For business reasons of supervision, safety, security or
morale, an employer may refuse to place both spouses in
the same department, division, or facility if the work
involves potential conflicts of interest or other hazards
greater for married couples than other persons.
E. "Relative" means child, step -child, parent, grandparent,
grandchild, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister,
aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, parent -in-law, brother-in-
law, sister-in-law, or another individual related by
blood or marriage living in the same household as the
City employee.
F. "Employee" means any person who receives a City paycheck
for services rendered to the City.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Nine
SECTION 27. NON-DISCRIMINATION
The City of Diamond Bar does hereby affirm to adopt and support a
Policy of non-discrimination with regard to all phases of personnel
recruitment, selection and appointment.
The City further declares that it will not exclude from
participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person on the basis of race, religion,
nationality, sex, age, or handicap, thereby affirming the City of
Diamond Bar's posture as an equal opportunity employer.
SECTION 28. EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPEALS
PROCEDURES
It is the intent of the City to offer fair and equitable appeals
procedure for employee's performance evaluations. Below are the
Official guidelines:
A. Employee and supervisor meet to review and discuss the
employee's performance evaluation.
B. The employee may respond in writing to the contents of
the evaluation. This response must be submitted to the
department head within five (5) working days immediately
following the evaluation.
C. The department head, as the reviewing official, shall
respond in writing to the employee within five (5)
working days. This response becomes an official part of
the evaluation.
D. If the employee chooses to continue to appeal following
the response from the reviewing official, the employee
must submit an additional written response to the
Personnel Director within five (5) working days after
receipt of the reviewing official's response.
E. The Personnel Director shall review the evaluation appeal
within five (5) days with the employee, supervisor and
department head. Every effort will be made at this level
to resolve the appeal.
F. If the matter is not settled, a written appeal may be
submitted to the City Manager by the employee within five
(5) working days following the decision rendered in
writing by the Personnel Director.
G. The City Manager shall review the appeal with the
employee, supervisor, department head and Personnel
Director. The decision shall be rendered in writing
within five (5) working days by the City Manager and
shall be final.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Ten
SECTION 29. PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS
All individuals who become a candidate for City employment must
successfully pass pre-employment physical and substance abuse
exams, and are subject to fingerprinting and a background
investigation.
The candidates being considered for employment will be sent to a
City -authorized physician at the City's expense.
SECTION 30. EMERGENCY CALL -OUT POLICY
The following Emergency Call -Out Policy shall be adhered to:
A. When a full-time employee, other than an Administrative/
Executive employee, is called out for a City emergency,
employee shall be given a minimum of two hours pay,
regardless of the amount of time it takes to rectify the
problem.
B. The employee shall be paid overtime per Section 13.
SECTION 31. ADMINISTRAT VE LEAVE
Administrative/Executive employees are allowed two (2) days of
administrative leave per fiscal year. Additional days of leave may
be authorized by the city Manager, based on the number of total
hours the individual works over and above 40 hours per week.
A. Administrative/Executive employees do not receive paid
overtime, and this leave is to recognize those employees
who work over and above 40 hours per week.
B. Following is a list of Administrative/Executive
Positions:
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Analyst
Assistant to the City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Associate Engineer
Director of Public Works
Associate Planner
Director of Community Development
Senior Accountant
Director of Parks and Maintenance
Superintendent of Parks and Maintenance
Secretary to City Manager
City Clerk
C. Administrative leave may not be accumulated and carried
over to the following year. It must be used by ,Tune 30
each fiscal year. Leave may be granted in hourly
increments. Requests shall be submitted to employee's
immediate supervisor for approval, then forwarded to the
City Manager for approval. Administrative leave will be
authorized at the convenience of the City and the work schedule.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Eleven
SECTION 32. MEDICARE
Pursuant to Revenue Billing 86-88 of the Internal Revenue Code, all
employees hired after March 31, 1987 will have 1.45 percent of
their base salary deducted from their paycheck to be paid to
Medicare. The City will match the 1.45 percent as mandated by law.
SECTION 33. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986
In compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986,
all new employees must verify identity and entitlement to work in
the United States by providing required documentation.
SECTION 34. EXTENDED BENEFITS - COBRA
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA)
provides for the continuation of health care coverage to certain
employees who terminate employment and beneficiaries of employees
who die, become disabled or are divorced. Employees become
eligible for continued coverage upon termination of service,
whether voluntary or not (other than termination for gross
misconduct), retirement or reduction in hours worked. For these
employees and their dependents, continued coverage is available for
18 months, at their expense.
SECTION 35. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
Subject to Council fiscal year budget authorization, each employee
shall be entitled to reimbursement in the amount of $500 per fiscal
year, for college -level or university -level educational courses
(including tuition and related books), which have been approved by
the Personnel Officer or his/her designate as being job-related and
Of value to the City. Reimbursement under this Section is
contingent upon the verification of the attainment of a letter
grade of ,c,, or better, or in those cases where no letter grade is
given, verification of completion of the course with a "Passes or ipt for registration bearing
"Credit's grade and submittal of a rece
the name of the course, for which reimbursement is being requested.
In the case of reimbursement for books for any approved/verified
course; a syllabus, course reading list or course outline showing
the book as being required for the course, plus a receipt bearing
the title of the book shall be submitted.
SECTION 36. PART-TIME EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Effective July 1, 1991, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees
Will be covered by a retirement system, under Social Security
(OASDI). An employee Is contribution rate shall be 6.2% on wages up
to $53,400. The employer's tax rate is the same. Election workers
and emergency workers are excepted from coverage, under this
section.
Resolution No. 90-45C
Page Twelve
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991.
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held
on the day of , 1992, and was finally adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held
on the day of , 1992, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of
the City of Diamond Bar
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
1991-92
(4.5%)
JOB TITLE
Range
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Receptionist
721
7.21
7.57
7.95
8.35
8.77
9.21
9.67
1,250.34
1,312.86
1,378.50
1,447.42
1,519.80
1,595.78
1,675.57
15,004.07
15,754.27
16,541.99
17,369.09
18,237.54
19,149.42
20,106.89
Jr. Clerk Typist
835
8.35
8.77
9.21
9.67
10.15
10.66
11.19
1,447.42
1,519.80
1,595.79
1,675.57
1,759.35
1,847.32
1,939.69
17,369.10
18,237.55
19,149.43
20,106.90
21,112.24
22,167.86
23,276.25
Clerk Typist
898
8.98
9.43
9.90
10.39
10.91
11.46
12.03
1,555.99
1,633.79
1,715.48
1,801.25
1,891.31
1,985.88
2,085.17
18,671.85
19,605.45
20,585.72
21,615.00
22,695.76
23,830.54
25,022.07
Account Clerk I
898
8.98
9.43
9.90
10.39
10.91
11.46
12.03
1,555.99
1,633.79
1,715.48
1,801.25
1,891.31
1,985.88
2,085.17
18,671.85
19,605.45
20,585.72
21,615.00
22,695.76
23,830.54
25,022.07
Adminstrative
Analyst
983
9.83
10.32
10.84
11.38
11.95
12.55
13.18
1,704.22
1,789.43
1,878.90
1,972.85
2,071.49
2,175.07
2,283.82
20,450.66
21,473.19
22,546.85
23,674.20
24,857.90
26,100.80
27,405.84
Secretary
987
9.87
10.36
10.88
11.43
12.00
12.60
13.23
1,710.86
1,796.41
1,886.23
1,980.54
2,079.56
2,183.54
2,292.72
20,530.35
21,556.87
22,634.71
23,766.44
24,954.77
26,202.50
27,512.63
Code Enforcement
1032
10.32
10.84
11.38
11.95
12.55
13.18
13.84
Officer
1,789.54
1,879.01
1,972.96
2,071.61
2,175.19
2,283.95
2,398.15
21,474.44
22,548.16
23,675.57
24,859.35
26,102.31
27,407.43
28,777.80
Parks Maintenance
1041
10.41
10.93
11.48
12.05
12.65
13.29
Worker H
1,804.45
1,894.67
1,989.40
2,088.87
2,193.32
2,302.98
13.95
2,418.13
21,653.35
22,736.02
23,872.82
25,066.46
26,319.78 27,635.77
29,017.56
Administrative
1068
10.68
11.22
11.78
12.37
12.98
13.63
14.32
Assistant
1,851.61
1,944.19
2,041.40
2,143.47
2,250.64
2,363.17
2,481.33
22,219.31
23,330.28
24,496.79
25,721.63
27,007.71 28,358.10
29,776.00
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
1991-92
(4.5%)
JOB TITLE
Iaeputy City Clerk
Range A
1088 10.88
1,885.56
22,626.69
B
11.42
1,979.84
23,758.03
C
11.99
2,078.83
24,945.93
D
12.59
2,182.77
26,193.22
E
13.22
2,291.91
27,502.88
F
13.88
2,406.50
28,878.03
G
14.58
2,526.83
30,321.93
Administrative
'�'
1088
10.88
1,885.56
22,626.69
11.42
1,979.84
23,758.03
11.99
2,078.83
24,945.93
12.59
2,182.77
26,193.22
13.22
2,291.91
27,502.88
13.88
2,406.50
28,878.03
14.58
2,526.83
30,321.93
Assistant to the
City Manager
1315
13.15
2,278.64
27,343.69
13.80
2,392.57
28,710.87
14.49
2,512.20
30,146.42
15.22
2,637.81
31,653.74
15.98
2,769.70
33,236.43
� 16.78
2,908.19
34,898.25
17.62
3,053.60
36,643.16
F-ggi°wring
Technician
1315
13.15
2,278.64
27,343.69
13.80
2,392.57
28,710.87
14.49
2,512.20
30,146.42
15.22
2,637.81
31,653.74
15.98
2,769.70
33,236.43
16.78
2,908.19
34,898.25
17.62
3,053.60
36,643.16
Plazzing
Technician
1315
13.15
2,278.64
27,343.69
13.80
2,392.57
28,710.87
14.49
2,512.20
30,146.42
15.22
2,637.81
31,653.74
15.98
2,769.70
33,236.43
16.78
2,908.19
34,898.25
17.62
3,053.60
36,643.16
Secretary to the
City Manager
1414
14.14
2,451.70
29,420.39
14.85
2,574.28
30,891.41
15.59
2,703.00
32,435.98
16.37
2,838.15
34,057.78
17.19
2,980.06
35,760.67
18.05
3,129.06
37,548.70
18.95
3,285.51
39,426.14
Superintendent of
Parks/Mce
1491
14.91
2,583.88
31,006.59
15.65
2,713.08
32,556.91
16.43
2,848.73
34,184.76
17.26
2,991.17
35,894.00
18.12 19.03
3,140.72 3,297.76
37,688.70 39,573.13
19.98
3,462.65
41,551.79
Senior Accountant
1642
16.42
2,845.43
34,145.20
17.24
2,987.70
35,852.46
18.10
3,137.09
37,645.08
19.00
3,293.94
39,527.33
19.95
3,458.64 3,6310.57
41,503.70 43,578.89
3,813.1.95 050
45,757.83
Associate planner
1719
17.19 18.05 18.96 19.90 20.90 21.94 23.04
2,980.37 3,129.39 3,285.86 3,450.15 3,622.66 3,803.79 3,993.98
35,764.42 37,552.65 39,430.28 41,401.79 43,471.88 45,645.48 47,927.75
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
SALARY RANGES BY POSITION
1991-92
(4.5%)
JOB TITLE
Range
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Associate Engineer
1719
17.19
18.05
18.96
19.90
20.90
21.94
23.04
2,980.37
3,129.39
3,285.86
3,450.15
3,622.66
3,803.79
3,993.98
35,764.42
37,552.65
39,430.28
41,401.79
43,471.88
45,645.48
47,927.75
City Clerk
1725
17.25
18.12
19.02
19.97
20.97
22.02
23.12
2,990.45
3,139.97
3,296.97
3,461.82
3,634.91
3,816.66
4,007.49
35,885.42
37,679.69
39,563.68
41,541.86
43,618.96
45,799.90
48,089.90
Director of Parks
1872
18.72
19.65
20.64
21.67
22.75
23.89
25.08
& Maintenance
3,244.48
3,406.70
3,577.04
3,755.89
3,943.68
4,140.87
4,347.91
38,933.74
40,880.42
42,924.44
45,070.67
47,324.20
49,690.41
52,174.93
Comm. Development
2414
24.14
25.35
26.62
27.95
29.35
30.81
32.35
Director
4,184.75
4,393.99
4,613.69
4,844.37
5,086.59
5,340.92
5,607.96
50,216.99
52,727.84
55,364.23
58,132.44
61,039.07
64,091.02
67,295.57
City Eng./Public
2414
24.14
25.35
26.62
27.95
29.35
30.81
32.35
Works Director
4,184.75
4,393.99
4,613.69
4,844.37
5,086.59
5,340.92
5,607.96
50,216.99
52,727.84
55,364.23
58,132.44
61,039.07
64,091.02
67,295.57
Assistant City
Manager
City Manager
Intern/Part--Time
2559 25.59 26.87 28.21 29.63 31.11 32.66 34.30
4,435.91 4,657.71 4,890.59 5,135.12 5,391.88 5,661.47 5,944.55
53,230.96 55,892.51 58,687.14 61,621.49 64,702.57 67,937.70 71,334.58
7,660.00
91,920.00
A B C D E F G
6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. G 4
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 REPORT DATE: January 31, 1992
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
TITLE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION - SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, DISPOSAL AND
RECYCLING SERVICES
SUMMARY: On December, 17, 1991, the City Council directed staff to evaluate the comparative
qualifications and service capabilities of two solid waste providers: Community Disposal and Western Waste
Industries. Subsequently, staff has prepared a Request for Information form and has distributed this form to
the two companies in order to obtain more precise information on their solid waste collection, disposal and
recycling services. After careful consideration of the history of solid waste collection services in the
community, it has been determined that the scope of the Request for Information process should be broadened
to include Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the scope of the Request for Information process be broadened
to include Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:& Staff Report
— Resolution(s)
— Ordinances(s)
— Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
— Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed Yes No
by the City Attorney?
_
N/A —
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
MAJORITY
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
N/A Yes No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
_ _
N/A Yes No
Which Commission?
— —
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
N/A Yes
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
_ — No
EWED B
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manage
,.- � �L
,I A��Troy utzlaff
Assis to the Mata r
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for Information - Solid Waste Collection, Disposal and
Recycling Services
ISSUE STATEMENT:
A Request for Information package has been prepared and disseminated to the
two solid waste companies identified by the City Council at their meeting of
December 17, 1991. After careful consideration of the history of solid waste
collection services in the community, it has been determined that the scope
of the Request for Information process should be broadened to include Waste
Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the scope of the Request for Information process be
broadened to include Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal implications.
BACKGROUND:
On December, 17, 1991, the City Council directed staff to evaluate the
comparative qualifications and service capabilities of two solid waste
providers: Community Disposal and Western Waste Industries. Subsequently,
staff has prepared a Request for Information form and has distributed this
form to the two companies in order to obtain more precise information on
their solid waste collection, disposal and recycling services. This
information has now been returned and staff has completed a preliminary
analysis of the two companies.
DISCUSSION:
In order to perform a more accurate evaluation of solid waste collection,
disposal and recycling services for the City, it became necessary to study
the historical setting for which these services have been provided. As a
result of this analysis, staff has determined that one company has been
providing solid waste collection services to the community since the mid -
19601s.
Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona Valley, Inc., formerly known as
Webster's Refuse Disposal, is the largest solid waste provider in the
community. They are presently servicing over 50% of the single-family
residential accounts and 66% of all commercial accounts in the City.
Furthermore, Waste Management has been instrumental in the development of the
Diamond Bar Improvement Association's pilot recycling program and other early
recycling programs.
Based upon the extensive number of accounts serviced by Waste Management,
would be appropriate to evaluate their capabilities in compariswould alloon to
companies previously identified. 9 nt� it
balanced comparison of serviceability than was heretofore avathe
w staff to ilable. a more
Therefore, staff would recommend that Waste Management of San Gabriel/Pomona
Valley, Inc., be allowed to submit a Request for Information
included in the analysis of solid waste providers that will be l�Pod at
the March 3 package and be
1992, City Council meeting, presented at
PREPARED BY:
Tr Butzla , A s'stant to the City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992 REPORT DATE: January 27, 1992
FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
TITLE: Resolution No. 89-97 F: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL.
SUMMARY: All cities are required to adopt conflict of interest codes designating certain
positions participating in making decisions which may affect financial interests.
Since adoption of the City's Code on October 3, 1989, amendments have been
necessary to add new positions or delete obsolete positions.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 89-97 F to add the positions of Associate Engineer,
Assistant to the City Manager and Administrative Assistant as well as various
contracting firms currently doing business with the City.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
X Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_Other
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Distribute adopted Resolution to all affected staff, Commissioners and
consultants.
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X* Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a mm'oriiy or 415 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? _ Yes X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? _ Yes X No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes _ No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
*City Attorney prepared original Resolution --this effort merely changes the exhibits.
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
rnvau)
MEETING DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
February 4, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager
Conflict of Interest Code for City Personnel
ISSUE STATEMENT:
All state and local government agencies (including cities) are required to
adopt conflict of interest codes designating certain positions which entail
the making or participation in the making of decisions which may affect
financial interests.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 89-97 F Amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code
for Designated City Personnel.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No financial impact.
BACKGROUND:
The City established its Conflict of Interest Code through adoption of
Resolution No. 89-97 on October 3, 1989. Six positions were designated at
that time to be required to file statements with the City Clerk disclosing
interests in real property and/or "income and investments from businesses
which provide or sell services or supplies of the type associated with the
job assignment and utilized by the City." Since that time, various
amendments have been adopted by the City Council for the purpose of
establishing further positions or adding Commissions also required to file
disclosure statements.
DISCUSSION:
In conjunction with the annual filing of Statements of Economic Interests on
April 1 as required by State law, the City Clerk has established an annual
review of applicable positions for the purpose of adding new positions or
deleting obsolete positions. Adoption of Resolution 89-97 F would add the
positions of Associate Engineer, Assistant to the City Manager and
Administrative Assistant as well as various contracting firms currently doing
business with the City.
PREPARED BY:
LyeA Burgess, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 89-97 F
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar duly
adopted Resolution No. 89-97 on October 3, 1989 establishing a
Conflict of Interest Code for Designated City Personnel; and
WHEREAS, the City has a need for consulting services and ad
hoc committees, task forces and similar groups and some of these
individuals/groups should be within the ambit of the conflict
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Resolution presently provides that the City
Manager may designated consultants in writing when they are deemed
to perform a range of duties requiring disclosure; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to authorize the
City Manager to designate ad hoc committees, task forces and other
similar groups as well as consultants.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
does hereby resolve as follows:
THAT, Resolution No. 89-97 is hereby amended by the inclusion
of the new Appendix A; of which a full, true and correct copy is
attached hereto.
THAT, the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
1992.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of
Mayor
11
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted
and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1992,
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar
LB: 1/23/92
APPENDIX A *
DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Assistant City Manager
Assistant to City Manager
Associate Engineer
Associate Planner
City Clerk
Director of Community Development
Director of Parks & Maintenance
Director of Public Works
Parks & Recreation Commission
Senior Accountant
Superintendent of Parks & Maintenance
Traffic & Transportation Commission
Treasurer
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1
1
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1, 2
1
2
2
1
2
Consultants, Ad Hoc Committees, Task Forces and similar groups:**
* NOTE: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney and Planning
Commissioners are required to submit disclosure statements pursuant
to State law (California Government Code Sections 87200, et. seq.) ,
not this Code.
** With respect to consultants, ad hoc committees, task forces and
similar groups, the City Manager shall determine in writing if a
particular consultant, ad hoc committee, task force or similar
group performs a range of duties requiring disclosure hereunder.
That determination shall include a description of the consultant's,
ad hoc committee's, task force's or similar group's duties and a
statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. A copy of that
determination shall be filed with the City Clerk and a copy
forwarded to the City Council.
LB: 1/23192
APPENDIX B
Category 1
Persons in this category shall disclose all interests in real
property within the jurisdiction of the City. Real property shall
be deemed to be within the jurisdiction if it or any part of it is
located not more than two miles outside the City's boundaries or
within two miles of any land owned or used by the City.
Category 2
Persons in this category shall disclose all income from and
investments in the businesses which provide or sell services or
supplies of the type associated with the job assignment and
utilized by the City. In addition, as to any business entity in
which the person or his or her spouse owns, directly, indirectly or
beneficially, a ten percent or greater interest, the person shall
disclose his or her pro rata share of the income and the sources of
income of the entity if the entity provides or sells services or
supplies of the type indicated in the first sentence of this
paragraph.
LB: 1/23/92
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City of Diamond Bar that
a public hearing will be held by the City Council on Tuesday,
February 4, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the
matter can be heard, in the AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California, pursuant to California Government
Code Section 87311, for the purpose of Amending Resolution No.
89-97 adopting a Conflict of Interest Code for designated City
personnel in accordance with the provisions of Political Reform
Act of 1974, California Government Code Section 81000 et seq.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend the
hearing and express opinions on the matter outlined above.
FURTHER INFORMATION may be obtained by calling the City
Clerk's Office (714) 860-2489.
DATED: January 16, 1992
/sj LYNDA BURGESS
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
PUBLISH: January 21, 1992
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 4, 1992
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
AGENDA NO. _/ 2
REPORT DATE: January 29, 1992
TITLE: Proposed statement of objectives and projected use of funds for the 1992-93 Community Development
Block Grant program.
SUMMARY: The City has scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and budgets for use of Community
Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). The City expects to receive approximately
$169,916.00 in federal funds as a participant in the 1992-93 Los Angeles Urban County CDBG
Program. The funds may be used for a variety of Community Development activities which
develop a viable urban community principally for persons of low and moderate income. The
purpose of the public hearing is to solicit public testimony and receive presentations from public
service organizations requesting funds prior to taking action on a final statement of program
objectives.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council (1) open the public hearing and receive
testimony and (2) continue the public hearing to February 18, 1992, for final action on the 1992-93 CDBG
Program.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1.
Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
Yes X No
by the City Attorney?
_
2.
Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
MAJORITY
3.
Has environmental impact been assessed?
X Yes No
4.
Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Yes X No
Which Commission?
_
5.
Are other departments affected by the report?
Yes X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
_
ZED � _T*"
b4*
-
Bert L. Vain Nort Terrence L. Belanger
-70
Yarnes DeStefan
City
Manager Assistant City Manag
Community De lopment Director
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
FINANCIAL SUMMARY: Approval of the proposed Statement of Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds will not have any impact upon the City
1992-93 budget. Approval of the CDBG budget will become a
part of the City 1992-93 budget document.
BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant Program is a component
of a larger Federal program providing formula grants to cities
in metropolitan areas that exceed a population of 50,000. The
City of Diamond Bar receives an annual grant based upon a
federal formula.
The use of CDBG funds must meet the primary objectives of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, which is to
benefit low and moderate income persons, aid in the prevention
and elimination of slums and blight, and to meet urgent
community development needs. CDBG grants are used for various
community development, housing, rehabilitation and public
service programs. The funds may only be used within low and
moderate income census tracts (of which the City has none)
and/or to benefit low and moderate income persons.
DISCUSSION: The planning process is underway to begin formulating project
activities and projected use of funds for the eighteenth
program year of Community Development Block Grant Program
funding. The City of Diamond Bar anticipates receiving
revenue in the amount of $169,916.00 for implementation of the
programs. The City has been a participant in the CDBG program
since July 1, 1991, when a budget and program was established
1
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE:
February 4, 1992
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
City Manager
SUBJECT:
Proposed statement of objectives and projected use of funds
for the 1992-93 Community Development Block Grant program.
ISSUE STATEMENT: The City of Diamond Bar receives Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds in order to provide programs,
projects or activities which
carry out the primary objectives
of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, which
principally benefit persons of low and moderate income. It is
necessary to develop a Statement of Objectives and Projected
Use
of Funds for submittal to Los Angeles County as a part -of
the 1992-93 CDBG Program Year.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council (1) open the public
hearing and receive testimony and (2) continue the public
hearing to February
18, 1992, for final action on the 1991-92
CDBG Program.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY: Approval of the proposed Statement of Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds will not have any impact upon the City
1992-93 budget. Approval of the CDBG budget will become a
part of the City 1992-93 budget document.
BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant Program is a component
of a larger Federal program providing formula grants to cities
in metropolitan areas that exceed a population of 50,000. The
City of Diamond Bar receives an annual grant based upon a
federal formula.
The use of CDBG funds must meet the primary objectives of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, which is to
benefit low and moderate income persons, aid in the prevention
and elimination of slums and blight, and to meet urgent
community development needs. CDBG grants are used for various
community development, housing, rehabilitation and public
service programs. The funds may only be used within low and
moderate income census tracts (of which the City has none)
and/or to benefit low and moderate income persons.
DISCUSSION: The planning process is underway to begin formulating project
activities and projected use of funds for the eighteenth
program year of Community Development Block Grant Program
funding. The City of Diamond Bar anticipates receiving
revenue in the amount of $169,916.00 for implementation of the
programs. The City has been a participant in the CDBG program
since July 1, 1991, when a budget and program was established
1
for the development of a senior citizens center to provide and
facilitate services and programs for Diamond Bar Seniors.
PREVIOUS YEAR CDBG PROGRAM. As part of its application
process, the City must describe the programs which were
implemented within the previous year and how those programs
meet the goals and objectives that have been established by
the City.
The only project proposed as part of the 1991-92 program is
the development of a Senior Citizen Center (Budgeted $150,000
- Expended $0) This multi-year project includes land
acquisition, program development, architectural and
engineering services to define, site and construct a senior
citizen center. The City continues to explore several
locations for the development of such a facility. Funds for
professional services to assist in the development of the
project may be utilized prior to the end of this program.
Funds available at the end of the current program year (June
30, 1992) will be reprogrammed into the 1992-93 program year
for continued development of a senior citizen center.
ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR FUNDING CONSIDERATION WITHIN 1992-93
PROGRAM YEAR. We have received requests from three (3) public
service agencies for funding from the 1992-93 program year
allocation. In compliance with CBDG rules and regulations,
the City may fund public service programs not to exceed a
maximum of 15% of the program grant ($25,487.40). The
requests are summarized in the following:
(1) Diamond Bar/Walnut Y.M.C.A. - The Y.M.C.A. proposes that
$15,000 be set aside for purposes of continuing an existing
after school/day care program for persons of low and moderate
income.
(2) Y.W.C.A. - The Montclair Y.W.C.A. is requesting
approximately $18,000 toward the implementation of a "Y'-
teen"program at the junior high school. The Y.W.C.A. Is
program is targeted toward high risk youths and is a program
that develops self-image, self-esteem, and leadership in young
girls.
(3) Boys Scouts of America Old Baldy Council. The Boy Scouts
of America have requested $5,000 to provide camperships of
$250 each for 20 boys in the fifth and sixth grades. The
program would bring boys from lower income families not
presently involved in scouting, to activity based campling
experience program.
The City of Diamond Bar proposes to utilize the balance of
funds toward the continued development of a Senior Citizens
Center. Not more than 10% of the proposed grant would be set
aside by the City for administrative costs and services. City
Staff will utilize the evaluation policy adopted by the City
Council in February of 1991 as a part of its review process
for the proposed program activities.
E
CONCLUSION: The purpose of the public hearing is to solicit public
testimony and receive presentations from public service
organizations requesting funds. It is an opportunity for the
Council to question the proposed public service organizations
as well as City Staff regarding the applications under
consideration.
The adoption of a final statement of Program Objectives and
Use of Funds for the 1992-93 CBDG Program Year is anticipated
on February 18, 1992. Specific recommendations regarding the
use of funds will be generated and supported by defined
programs and funding allocations at that time.
PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing notice regarding the proposed Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds was published in the
Highlander, Tribune and Bulletin. A second publication is
scheduled prior to the February 18, 1992, continued public
hearing. Additionally, notices of the proposed public hearing
have been posted at public places within the community
pursuant to our City posting policy.
PREPARED BY:
-�
- km&
J mes DeStefa o
Attachments: City of Diamond Bar Request for CBDG Funding
Notice of Public Hearing
Evaluation Policy
C:\WP51\AGENDA\CDBG-CC.A0D
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
1992-93 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
The City of Diamond Bar expects to receive approximately $169,916
in federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as a
participant in the 1992-93 Los Angeles Urban County CBDG program.
The City has scheduled a public hearing to discuss programs and a
budget for the use of the CDBG funds.
The Diamond Bar City Council will conduct a public hearing on
February 4, 1992, prior to their taking action to formulate a Final
Statement Of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of
Funds for the 1992-93 CDBG program year. City Staff will present
details of the proposed program and all interested persons will be
invited to speak.
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS
GOAL: To carry out the primary objective of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, to develop a viable
urban community, principally for persons of low and moderate
income.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To develop a senior center to provide and facilitate an
extensive menu of services and programs for Diamond Bar
seniors.
2. To provide public services concerned with child care,
crime prevention, health, drug abuse and education, among
others.
3. To provide planning and administrative capacity to
implement the City's CDBG program objectives.
The program will be implemented to provide primary benefit to low
and moderate income residents of the community.
All interested persons are invited to attend the City Council
public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 4, 1992. The
hearing will be held at the South Coast Air Quality Management
District located at 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
Additional details concerning any of the above information may be
obtained by calling the City Community Development Department at
(714) 396-5676.
James DeStefano
Director of Community Development
JDS:mco
C: %)NT51 \PUB-HEAR.NOT\CDBG. FAX
r.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REQUEST FOR CITY CDBG FUNDING
Request for City CDBG Funding will be evaluated as it relates to
meeting the community needs and objectives, of the City of Diamond
Bar.
The City of Diamond Bar will consider a project which is directed
towards the communityls need for improvement, development,
employment, maintenance, and public services and facilities.
Award for contribution will be evaluated according to the
following:
1. The proposed project should expand capital formation, business
development, and ownership opportunities in the City; or
2. The proposed project should emphasize programs which show
early results, create high visibility, yet have the potential
of producing enduring community benefits; or
3. The proposed project should expand job opportunities and the
urban tax base by increasing the incentives for industrial and
commercial reinvestment; or
4. The proposed project should provide facilities and services
which meet basic human needs and are essential to sound
community development; or
S. The proposed project should encourage public/private sector
partnerships for job training, placement and management
assistance which promote participation in the Diamond Bar
community and ensure curriculum responsible to the market
place; or
6. The proposed project should eliminate blight by improving the
appearance and upkeep of private and public property and
encourage programs which maintain and upgrade the quality of
life and environment; or
7. The proposed project should be economically sound with
multiple source funding, which, where applicable, have a
significant volunteer component; or
Page Two
City CDBG Funding
8. The proposed project should stress tangible and measurable
results and demonstrate strong community involvement, linkage
to related supportive services such as Employment, Crime
Prevention, Child Care, Senior Citizen Services, Health, Drug
and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program, Youth Diversion Programs
and Activities, and Neighborhood Watch Programs; or
9. The proposed project should demonstrate acquisition,
construction/reconstruction, rehabilitation, or installation
and improvement of the following public facilities which are
necessary for the applicant's neighborhood revitalization.
These facilities are: senior citizen centers; parks;
playgrounds and other recreational facilities; centers for the
handicapped; neighborhood facilities; solid waste disposal
facilities; fire and police protection facilities; parking
facilities; public utilities; street improvements; water and
sewer facilities; flood and drainage facilities; and other
facilities and improvements which are necessary for the
applicant's neighborhood revitalization will have a high
priority.
NOTE: Any program or project, in order to be approved for
CDBG funding, must comply with all CDBG policy,
procedure, and criteria.