HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/03/1991THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON
CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR
PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL MEETING TAPES WILL BE
BLACKED IMIlVIEDIATELY AFTER AIRING AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR
REPRODUCTION.
1. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION:
Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9
Personnel - Government Code Section 54957.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Resolution No. 91-68
Next ordinance No. 8 (199 1)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 6:12 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Forbing
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN WERNER, NARDELLA, PAPEN,
MAYOR PRO TEM KIM, MAYOR FORBING
3. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council
discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled f or action
at a future meeting.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular
meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the
Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already
scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to
the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time
limit when addressing the City Council.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are
considered routine and are approved by a single motion.
5.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
5.1.1 GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Dec. 5, 1991 - 6:30 p.m.,
AQMD Conference Room, 21865 E. Copley
5.1.2 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Hosted by Walnut Valley Water
District - Dec. 9, 1991 - 6:30 p.m., Acapulco Restaurant, 880 Diamond Bar
Blvd.
5.1.3 PLANNING COMMISSION - Dec. 9, 1993. - T 00 p.m., AQMD Hearing
Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
5.1.4 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - Dec. 12, 1991 7:00 p.m., City
Hall, 21660 E. Copley, #100
5.1.5 TRES HERMANOS SCOPING SESSION - Dec. 12, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.,
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
5.1.6 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMNIISSION - Dec. 12,1991- 6:30
p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley
5.1.7 HERITAGE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER WORKSHOP - Dec. 16,
1991 - 7:00 p.m. - Community Room, 1061 S. Grand
5.1.8 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Dec. 17, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., AQMD
Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley
5.1.9 PLANNING COMMISSION - Dec. 23, 1991 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Hearing
Room, 21865 E. Copley
5.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 19, 1991.
5.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated December 3, 1991 in
the amount of $553,207.24.
5.4 RECEIVE & FILE TREASURER'S REPORT - Month of October, 1991.
5.5 RECEIVE & FILE TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 10, 1991.
5.6 RECEIVE & FILE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES -
Meeting of October 24, 1991.
5.7 AUDIT REPORT FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1991 - The Accounting firm
of Thomas, Byrne & Smith has been retained as auditors. In conjunction with this
service, a Final Audit Report for FY 90-91 has been transmitted.
Recommended Action: Receive & file Final Audit Report for FY 90-91 as
prepared.
5.8 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF
THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 1991,
DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED
BY LAW.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX declaring the results of the
General Municipal Election held on November 5, 1991.
5.9 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE ACT OF
1950 AS AMENDED.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX authorizing City Manager
and Assistant City Manager to execute necessary documents for financial assistance
under Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950.
5.10 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT-LMD 039 On
October 15, 1991, Council authorized staff to solicit bids for purchase and
installation of playground equipment in the mini -park within LMD 439, located at
the corner of Softwind and Stardust Drives. Staff prepared plans and specifications
and advertised for bids.
Recommended Action: Award a contract for purchase and installation of
playground equipment in LMD #39 mini -park to MD Structural Contractors, the
lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $12,587.88.
5.11 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Filed by James & Dorothy Cissna on November 12,
1991.
Recommended Action: Deny.
5.12 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT 1992 - The City
submitted two grant applications for specific park project funding through the 1992
Park Bond Act. Projects submitted were the development of Pantera Park and the
acquisition and development of Site I'D". one of the requirements of the application
was a Council resolution in support of the proposed project. The City has been
notified that it is eligible to receive $2 million for development of Pantera Park in
addition to the per capita grants of $720,000.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX in support of the L.A. County
Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.
6.1 RECOGNITION OF VIC HOSLER - Vic Hosler, Parks Maintenance
Worker, has devised a tool for installing the flags on the Edison light poles.
The use of this tool has saved considerable staff time and reduced the City's
liability exposure.
Recommended Action: Recognize Mr. Hosler for his cost saving idea which
reduces staff time required to install and remove flags by approximately
50%.
7. SWEARING IN CEREMONIES:
7.1 PRESENTATION TO COUNCILMAN DONALD NARDELLA
7.2 SWEARING-IN OF COUNCILMEMBERS-ELECT - Phyllis E. Papen and Gary G.
Miller - officiated by the Honorable Robert Martinez, Judge of the Los Angeles
County Superior Court.
7.3 REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL:
7.3.1 Selection of Mayor
7.3.2 Selection of Mayor Pro Tem
7.4 PRESENTATION TO MAYOR JOHN FORBING
7.5 CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
RECESS: RECEPTION
OLD BUSINESS:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 91-71: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL
STANDARDS OF OPERATION - The Council previously considered and
amended the draft Standards of Operation Resolution (September 10, 1991). Staff
was directed to make the suggested modifications and return the revised Resolution
to the Council for further consideration.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91-71 establishing City Council
Standards of Operation.
9. NEW BUSINESS:
9.1 RESOLUTION NO. 91-72: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PRESCRIBING A METHOD OF
DRAWING WARRANTS AND CHECKS UPON CITY FUNDS - Pursuant to
California law, the City Council may prescribe a method for drawing warrants and
checks.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91-72 authorizing and directing the
execution of all documents reasonably necessary to implement the method for
payment of checks and warrants.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matter can be heard.
10.1. RESOLUTION NO. 91-73: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 23039 TO CONSOLIDATE TWO LOTS (20 & 21 OF TRACT 39679)
INTO ONE PARCEL AT 21700 E. COPLEY DRIVE, ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - Zelman Development Company is
requesting a Tentative Parcel Map to merge two lots located at 21700 E. Copley
Dr.
Recommended Action: Receive public testimony and adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX
approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 23039 to merge two lots.
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
12. ADJOURNMENT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.,F,1
DATE:
��L � 1 /
z yL��e
z w/,-, t r) E Ecc&n-,rzL
7HIs Miz7
A- a7 'rpt
TO:
City Clerk
z`%,
7H/5 w/N/TE
FROM:
ADDRESS:
? j5 c=c"C/% A,
f/�!i✓�-� L�li�4,vi>
�'�Ak" CA
ORGANIZATION: D/A D/A/11 l -)/ii\' CA 0 LZ � �'C 14
SUBJECT: i ,E5cL,,.Ttc/- c-0%,
i
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
,tQJEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGAW''ENG AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE:
TO: C -It'? cl-ark
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT: /V J
I expect to address i --h,,? Council on the subject agenda item.
Council Minutes ref"--3ct my name and address -as Writte abo
A/
Please have the
`Signature
NOTE: All persons, may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. .f and r] �-
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS:
�C.
i
ORGANIZATION: 5_`�C'/)� 1, r�JOf) J c;�U � V fiG�rc
SUBJECT:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Sig ature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL a
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOVEMBER 19, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER: M/Forbing called the meeting to
order at 6:00 p.m. -in the Council
Chambers, AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E.
Copley Dr.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge
of Allegiance by Councilmember-elect
Gary Miller.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Forbing, Mayor Pro Tem Kim,
Councilmen Papen, Nardella and
Werner.
Also present were Robert L. Van
Nort, City Manager; Terrence L.
Belanger, Assistant City Manager;
Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney;
James DeStefano, Director of
Community Development; Sid Mousavi,
Public Works Director/City Engineer
and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk.
2. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Nardella suggested that staff
request Jones Intercable to air the printed Agenda on Mondays
preceding Council meetings.
C/Papen announced that she had requested Jones Intercable to
air CalSpan, (proceedings from Sacramento) and suggested that
persons interested in access to this system make their wishes
known to Jones Intercable.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr.,
thanked the City and the Boys Club for removing graffiti at
106 Rock River Dr. He stated that local freeways are badly in
need of graffiti removal and asked if there is a graffiti
hotline number for citizens to use.
CM/Van Nort stated that he was not aware of any hotline for
graffiti.
Joe Johnston, 3177 Castle Rock Rd., spoke in regard to noise
level ratings that had been taken approximately a month ago in
the vicinity of Cold Springs Rd. and asked for clarification
of a letter that he had received from CalTrans.
M/Forbing thanked Mr. Johnston for bringing the matter to
Council's attention and suggested that he speak with David Liu
in Engineering regarding his concerns.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR: CM/Van Nort reported the following
changes to the Consent Agenda: Minutes of November 5, 1991
"as amended" and Item 4.5, "Septic Sewer System in the
Country" was deleted. On Item 4.7 "Parcel Map 15625," add
"approve a Subdivision Agreement with Tedrus properties" and
insert the word "public" on Page 1, B1 of the agreement to
read "public improvements."
NOVEMBER 19, 1991 PAGE 2
C/Werner stated that, on the advice of counsel, he would
abstain from voting on Item 4.13, "Award of Architectural
Services for Heritage Park Community Building Reconstruction.
C/Papen moved, MPT/Kim seconded, to approve the Consent
Calendar as amended. With the following Roll Call vote,
motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Nardella, Papen, MPT/Kim, M/
Forbing
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN - C/Werner (Award of Architectural Svcs.
for Heritage Park Community Bldg.
Reconstruction only.)
4.1 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MEETINGS:
4.1.1 GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - November 21,
1991 - 6:30 p.m., Hotel Diamond Bar, 259
Gentle Springs Rd.
4.1.2 PLANNING COMMISSION - November 25, 1991 - 7:00
p.m., AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
4.1.3 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - November 28 & 29, 1991
- City Offices will be closed.
4.1.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - December 3, 1991 - 6:00
p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
4.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4.2.1 Adjourned Regular Meeting, October 29, 1991 -
Approved as submitted.
4.2.2 Regular Meeting, November 5, 1991 - Approved
as amended.
4.3 WARRANT REGISTER - Approved Warrant Register dated
November 19, 1991 in the amount of $223,103.78.
4.4 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular
Meeting of October 14, 1991.
4.5 SEPTIC SEWER SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY - Tabled.
4.6 AGREEMENT WITH POMONA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -
Approved agreement with PVTA and authorized the Mayor to
execute on behalf of the City.
4.7 PARCEL MAP NO. 15625, 525 GRAND AVENUE - Approved Parcel
Map No. 15625, authorized the City Engineer to execute
the map, approved Subdivision Agreement with Tedrus
Properties and directed the City Clerk to process the map
for recordation.
4.8 BOND EXONERATION - GRADING - PARCEL MAP NO. 1528 -
Approved and accepted completed work, exonerated Surety
Bond No. 0156454939 posted for grading at 3020 Windmill
Dr., Parcel Map No. 1528 in the amount of $8,920 and
NOVEMBER 19, 1991 PAGE 3
instructed the City Clerk to notify L.A. County of
Council's action.
4.9 BOND EXONERATIONS - TRACTS 36813, 42580 AND 31941 -
Approved and accepted work completed and exonerated
surety bonds posted for Tract No. 36813 in the amount of
$105,100; Tract No. 42580 in the amount of $150,000 and
Tract No. 31941 in amounts of $296,000 and $43,700 and
instructed the City Clerk to notify L.A. County of
Council's action.
4.10 REDUCTION OF SURETY BOND FOR TRACT NO. 42584 - Accepted
work completed and reduced the surety bond posted for
Tract No. 42584 in the amount of $380,000 and instructed
the City Clerk to notify L.A. County of Council's action.
4.11 PATHFINDER BRIDGE PROJECT STATUS REPORT - Received and
filed update on the status of the Pathfinder Bridge
widening project.
4.12 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 89-76A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-
HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE & RECREATION PROGRAM FOR THE
HERITAGE PARK RECONSTRUCTION.
4.13 AWARD OF ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR HERITAGE PARK
COMMUNITY BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION - Awarded project to
Wolff/Lang/Christopher Architects, Inc. for architect-
ural services for Heritage Park Community Building
reconstruction in an amount not to exceed $46,130 and
authorized the Mayor to execute the amended Professional
Services Agreement.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - PROCLAMATIONS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.
5.1 PROCLAIMED NOVEMBER 21, 1991 AS "GREAT AMERICAN SMOKEOUT
DAY." Proclamation presented to Leona Wu, L.A. County
Department of Health Services, San Gabriel Valley County
Health Centers Network Tobacco Control Program and Ceci
Martinez, Education Services Manager of the San Gabriel,
Pomona Valleys' Unit of the American Cancer Society.
Ms. Wu presented Council with "anti -tobacco use" buttons,
brochures and pamphlets courtesy of the American Cancer
Society and the Tobacco Control Program.
5.2 PROCLAIMED WEEK OF NOVEMBER 24-30, 1991 AS "WOMEN'S
BOWLING WEEK."
M/Forbing reported that he had attended the Ranch
Festival Appreciation dinner on November 15th during
which he was presented with a plaque for the City and a
check in the amount of $906.78 to be used for Parks and
Recreation projects.
NOVEMBER 19, 1991
CM
7.
PAGE 4
5.3 HOLIDAY SHUTTLE SERVICE - CE/Mousavi reported that,
following review and approval by the Traffic and
Transportation Commission, Holiday Shuttle Services will
commence on November 25 and end December 31, 1991 and
will operate between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., 7 days a
week except Thanksgiving and Christmas. It will make 37
stops throughout the City's shopping areas. Proposition
A funds will cover the costs of the program, which are
estimated to be $25,000.
C/Nardella asked whether independent groups or activities
such as the Sr. Citizens' Centers or apartment buildings,
had been given additional consideration for this bus
service.
CE/Mousavi stated that Commissioner Gravdahl worked with
the -Senior Citizens and the C-bam_ber of Commerce in
developing the proposed route which is similar to last
year's.
Following discussion, C/Nardella suggested that staff
look into providing better service during Christmas
vacation for children going to the movies, etc.
OLD BUSINESS:
6.1 BUSINESS LICENSE SURVEY UPDATE - ACM/Belanger stated that
a City/Chamber Business License Survey had been prepared
in cooperation with Chamber representatives to educate
and request comments regarding feelings and perceptions
relating to business licenses by the business community.
All identifiable businesses within the City will be sent
the survey --not just those businesses which are members
of the Chamber.
NEW BUSINESS:
7.1 PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY - CM/Van Nort stated that a
letter of resignation had been received from Planning
Commissioner Grace Lin effective November 30.
C/Nardella moved, C/Papen seconded to accept the
resignation of Planning Commissioner Grace Lin and
declare a vacancy on the Planning Commission effective
November 30, 1991. Motion carried unanimously.
C/Nardella requested that a letter be sent to Mrs. Lin to
thank her for her commitment and dedication to the City.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as matter may
be heard.
8.1 SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT - M/Forbing
reopened the Public Hearing and stated that the Council
Committee met with staff and recommended continuation of
NOVEMBER 19, 1991 PAGE 5
the Hearing to December 17, 1991 to conclude the legally -
mandated review period and enable staff to complete an
analysis of the document and other integrated waste
management issues.
With no public testimony offered, M/Forbing continued the
Hearing to December 17.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Papen requested that the meeting be
adjourned in memory of Mr. Steve Ballreich, former Mayor of
Alhambra.
10. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct,
M/Forbing adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. in memory of Mr.
Steve Ballreich.
ATTEST:
Mayor
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Pro Tem Rim and Councilmember Papen
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: voucher Register, December 3, 1991
DATE: November 26, 1991
Attached is the Voucher Register dated December 3, 1991. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
it's entry on the Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated December 3, 1991 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
001
General Fund
117
OTS Fund
138
LLAD #38
Fund
139
LLAD #39
Fund
141
LLAD #41
Fund
225
Grand Av.
Const. Fund
TOTAL
ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
J
Linda G. Magnason
Senior Accountant
Obert an Nort
City Manager
AMOUNT
$483,815.33
30,314.15
10,691.11
15,589.61
66.17
12.730.87
$553,207.24
Phyl is E. Papen
Councilmember
Jay C. Kim
Mayor Pro Tem
�"-'�'T z'T�'•_ `1'a _ tO:i4T
Ac: gate LanGs�ape
__�::.te
1138-4538-55+00
3 212/38
+139-45 ?-55 0
:�
3 : 2 2 A
M
-c,Jfn�
+139-4539-5580
2 21203A
"__J.��e _ans'ape 4coUr,, e
}139-4539-590 1 21203A
X138-44:8-5500 11:03.8
Aliens TrUe Value
+W-431@-120
��aidy b1rW BTA
+001-4011+-2323
r11en5 1 :Ue
1 212913A 03%1185
Ka10f�,)ie`d
1 212'/33
3avless Stationers Bayless
X001-4310-1100 1 21203A
'ro;= ..1u6;San 5adriel Vlv bovsClUb
1 212030
Erea, City cf BreaCity
+001-4350-5380 . ?12038
as �u
lv '3
•eelina 7u'JJ:1�] .a _�
v�._u
... 1b
M
.,--. VENDOR ---------
41
11!:.E
12/03
23+10
Ecrinxler Repair -Dist 38
0+ ,2
a 1: 25
12'03
23010
Sprinkler Repair -Dist 39
{22.LU
i1,'25
12103
20,115
Clear '14eed from Larkstone
475.00
11125
12!03
23218
Dist 38 Taint
3,100.03
11;25
12103
2321q
Dist 39 Maint
S,5".00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
°.5'7.46
11/25
12'83
22839
Sprinter Repair -Dist 3?
15.13
11125
!2103
22855
Sprinkler Repair -Dist 38
76M9
'i]iAL DUE 'VENDOR --
Q21.22
11/25
12;03
01?%7
A,2rating Supplies
E?.k12
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
:3.02
11!2S
442/03
91 Installation-CCouncil
1504/^0 1215x3,'91 00001323'
TCTAL PRE?AID AMOUNT ----.
-------
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR ----------
11!25
11'25
12/03
11823520
Pile -Cassette Holders
15.38
TOTAL DUE VENDOR, --------:
11!25
12,103
5eot-5raffiti Removal
1,090.80
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------r
1,098.00
11%25
12103
Dec -Recreation Svcs
25,?23.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
25,923.08
k i
1
Ti
fet:1-y6"y'.i',-2:i'�7
+4c;1_4t9b0-403t 1 � :y3 T � t. "
L1L .H 2s 1L' -_ 2C omoute .a 1n 745.:0
T��L _._------ 745
.S
kS, 45501'ates �.
7ri C 1,2vice Inven. Prog 30,314.15
v''Ll, L DUE ,ErDCR-------- 30,314.15
Diamond Far Business Asoc DBBU54ssoc
+0011-4090-2110
1 212934
11!25
12/03
1444 Add! CAM Owed
S.652.00
*.+ii -4090-2210
2 21283A
12/83
:/25
12,'03
18.27
Nor =ommon Area Maint
117.00
+r01-4098-2210
3 212{93A
4256556
11 25
12 3
+801-4030-2310
%eL Common Area Maigt.
177.8N
12/03
5654353
Fuel-Cmgr
11.28
+001-4030-2310
4 21203A
")TAL DUE 'VENDCR--------
6.586.00
Diamond Bar Hills
Club Ba:Hills
12.35
+801-4030-2310
1 21203A
111/25
12/@3
5651621
++'921-4090- 3
_ @3E
+001-4030-2310
a
-03
12183
.. a a� .eserration
050.00 ac.. /91 "0001 2.
zi+�1i-409w-2399
2 2.103c
111; 5
12/03
'.leanln,O Deo05it
5`0,00 12;03191 000' 13233
'^T ^L PREPAID AMOUNT ----,
2'00.00
T 3 T A L DL.E VEsDCR--------!
@ 09
:5tman 1nC.
tast"a1
+A7', -49f?, -622t2
-.
J^'
�1L'.._'�
t2 i S2
.2:L
'1 25
..;
aL%�
12 3
�d94d 1
'ii '' F ion
_umCU 2r kr+S.dL U�.
199. 5
3
+ 1-4+48-12 8
...2 �8
1�,121�
11,'25
12/03
8i45i8:
5u piles- :lk
4.14
+0«1-X038-1288
1 212838
16/1213
11/25
12193
814:186
5uopl12s-Lmgr
33.91
i-41-490-11";3
212KH
1711,213
/a�f:
11/25
I �ia3
787
9a4b�
5-c
.uppiie en tort
75.96
1,
4181-4440-624x?
2 212038
01/1252
11:'25
112/03
815820
Emera Preo Equip
441.66
xy^i-= 50-1201
a 21203D
20:1213
11:25
121038..'"�b
= -Finance
cies
3. r3
-405e'-12•.`^0
2 212038
2 21112 13
11/25
12/x73
8180407
S::colies-Finance
19.36
4='j01-4098-1280
1 21203B
2fi1213
11:25
12/+13
8180408
5upolie5-Sen Govt
135.25
2712038
23 12131
f 2 5
12/03
8'80409
:uoplie5- ng
320.
+ 81-4040-12%10
2 21203B
24/1213
11%25
12.103
6190151
S:.pplie5-CClt.
5.33
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------- 1,649.86
Exxon
ExxonS
+001-4090-231@
1 21203A
.1/25
12/83
4252356
=uel-62n Govt
18.27
+001-4310-2310
1 212KA
11125
12:83
4256556
Fuel-Park.5
33.00
+801-4030-2310
3 21203A
11/25
12/03
5654353
Fuel-Cmgr
11.28
+001-4030-2310
4 21203A
1.;25
12,••03
5655054
Fuei-C,mgr
12.35
+801-4030-2310
1 21203A
111/25
12/@3
5651621
Fuel-Cmgr
18.95
+001-4030-2310
2 21203A
11/25
12183
5357024
Fuel-Cmor
15.70
`;T„ DUE VENDOR ------- 1@9.55
cine;; -.._sex
a`- �d1ltCrn:3 L
aonsal�e & Sun. .roe ;. 'onsai,_.
Harr ban 1115
+,Mi -1+'6 1 21120"35
yeller & Associ311es �IeI er
+001-2110-1904 1 2120vA
+ +l -c110-11^4 2 212 3A,
+001-2110-1996 1 _1203A
s_;0i-21.0-i�;a6 2 21s+?�
f1l�hidnaer PL!bil': 3t i;:,nS !?: giii3nu er
+�±0 i -v21 �-91:5 12d 3H
Hotel Diamond Bar Ramadainr,
0401-4210-2325 . 212034
Huun3sakerr 8 Associates rUU^sdter
+9d1-4551 5221 1 21203E
'OTAL DUE .ENDOP---------
25
12%:^
-.0-. C. n vii
DUE vELNDGR--------
5 .09
'0 L CSE ,E COR+
-+ ^1
.1.25
1L'0.3
Prof 3Vcs-Dec,
z!'',,��
ICTAL DUE VENDOR -------- %i
11/25
12103 :aTh
Recreation Ra:dnd
25.08
TIUT4L DUE VENDOR --------;
11)25
11!03
Dental Premiums
..;2S
12/03
Cctooer Correction
1i%25
19'93
Vision Premiums -Dec
359.2'
11;25
12103
October Correction
9.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
11;25
12+f:
Puo Notice-UrAC Mtgs Nov
-------`
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----------
11/25
11 /215
12/03 iib
SPAC Mtg. 11/7/91
125.'0
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------:
125,04
11/25
12:03
Engr Svcs -Scout Annexatin
2,508.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
21500.04
AiCJ,lN? r��'?.�;-e: BATCH Gn `rn•i,� "v ?,3_Pi*.. 5 ��C V
"' -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
Inland :'alley Dlv
Bulletn T
+001-4210-21:5
3 212?38
+ ii�l-421+1-2114
3 ?i .eH
+001-4048-2115
1 7-12.03R
4A01--»50-0090
l'ec-Cafeteria Cc7trlb-7.Mg
++.rl-u:iSi-'G4A
1 2124.30
:t
,3
+001 -4510 -?090
i 21=;3c
Inland :'alley Dlv
Bulletn T
+001-4210-21:5
3 212?38
+ ii�l-421+1-2114
3 ?i .eH
+001-4048-2115
1 7-12.03R
`n 3 Assoc relth'iint
t.eiL Vint L
+001-4310-6400 2 21203D L'i!1156
L.5. County-Sheriff`s Dec .ACSher:..
+;91;1-4411-5401 i 21}038
_.A. ounty-Sheriff s Dep :.ACSher/ff
+✓di -4411-54%1 2 --32
4141-4412-5401 c1.wcJ
Wil-4413-ti4A1 1 212938
Leaa.'e of Ca. C"ties League
+.,0i-4020-2325 2 21283E
i^
it,'fB
41 69
De:
:c.Rc Cc^trl6.-P?23i24
::X25
12/03
91f69
?ct-Contract Svc
l'ec-Cafeteria Cc7trlb-7.Mg
i �
ll 2
1 25
:t
,3
lec
cafeteria ry ,,,•�- Cly.
339.40
: t,L DUE Y NUC . -_--_-_-
T.:312.534.36
.%
, .. 5 3
7 ! Y`i:, 6
..Lr
bcc
� a f e t r i a 'Co n,tr-
is Briefing-lli21
25.00 12r%:3!91 0000013232
D2C
3feteria Contr-Plnq
.24
_
.Zit3
pec
L'afeterla Ci,ntr'Prra
593.5'
:2
:3
Dec
afeteria Contr-Ener
I26 .49
_-
'^�
a i��.; ------"-.
�. ,
4 ,
-r
.dci:39t
P'ib
�rQ-PC Mtg 11 25/91
?+5.7a
25
12/03
'dc13631
°ub
Hrg-GPAC Mtgs (Nov)
4?. 50
1 !25
.2-a3
cci6194
Pub
nrg-C-M-BE-IiC :,one
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------- 162.25
11 25 12103 330935 Pl;grnd Equipment 22,833.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------- 22.833.0
._;25 12!039112.' Oct-4e1icaoter Svc 151.96
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 167.96
:1:25
1-91K
41 69
Jct -Contract Svcs
9.389.95
::X25
12/03
91f69
?ct-Contract Svc
64,548.64
i �
ll 2
122 03
? lh? ..a.
Oct -C ct
� c.ntr3 Svcs
219,096.4;
: t,L DUE Y NUC . -_--_-_-
T.:312.534.36
.%
, .. 5 3
7 ! Y`i:, 6
..Lr
25
12'93
is Briefing-lli21
25.00 12r%:3!91 0000013232
70TAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
75.00
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR --------;
0.00
McCain Traffic Supply McCain
+225-4518-6412 05192 2 21203$ 011116:4 11125 12iO3 66964 Trfc Signal -Grand 6,631.99
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------- 1, 6,631.99
E
r 7 r
C T P r T T
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
s 4-e
_ 8
S 4 T'
J4
+:':!1-Y-:p1no
4
Itq i
1;, +,;24
V I
PRE --P71 AMOUNT
J:.A DUE - --------
Nevco Scclet:ard
I i 6
DUE vENDGR - ---------
130.16
\ew Tezhrolog:es
levlTe ^^1
+091-40Q$-6230
1 212.3K
111,25
12193
1 525
1-3 Floppy Drne
81.19
T"'L DUE VENDOR ---------
j im U
6'41.19
Pacesetter Buildirg
Svcs Pacesetter
+391-4220-5291
) 2 12? 3 E
25
i2+693
1386PC
°tan Chkg g !0/28-11/21
4,031.39
1 21203E
111125
12iO3
2838 -BI
Bldg Svcs 10/28-11121
19,826.41
TOTAL D UE VENDOR --------- 1-
231863.79
�-zcesel-ter Building
cs '-acesetteD
Vv i -4 0 40
3 212+3A
11/25
12 03
Suite rental -11191
7 1-1 T DUE VENDOR ---------
3,557.69
Papen, Phyllis
PaoenP
+01-410-2325
4
111126
12/03
DIB P, --n '-est 11/15
25.0@
+r01-4310-2:25
" 21203E
11,!26
12/83
B:Ief-11121
8.73
1 21203E
11"26
12/03
71a 7Lont L-ities 5/16-20
209.30
-`o!-4K0-2330
2 21203E
1111:26
I2,,03
L230ue Mtc 10112-15
IS7.0
71-,T-11 DUE VENDOR ---------
4+0.;3
Pavrollil Transfer
Oa,,,rG'!Tr
*W -IM
i 2 120 aE
"I"K
112/03
Payroll Transfer -PP 24
49,900.00
1203/911 001+00002it
73TAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----
461000.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------- ,
0.00
pierning, Ron
PfenningR
*401-4010-1200
2 21123310
11125
12103
98.31
2 Name Plates
54.143
091-404-6220
3 212030
1112e3
11211!3
9631
2 Credenzas & Bookshelf
1,569.62
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
1,623.75
t
NAME
E 1i
— N' ✓4111...7Y.-9 AT'.H P,`d:. —' �Y:D'Jt :i',._— .�.k`• i ,y ,'1' _Y! 7A — -t...
________________________________________________________________________________________________--__-_----____..--_----_--__-___-__-_-
!.-2ti ._ ealS "?e .,,.I. 'tj'�Ut?1t _v.rs7
�om-na `lallev H -.,Tape
+001-4431-S43
Postage B'41 Phone !'JS1[E'0r3n
_.27 41 r'' 3
Public Empl Retirement FZH
+001-2119-1990 1 :.2O3C 11'25 a /03
X991-2,1,10-14Os 2 212? C X1;2=. i21O3
R 1 D Kueor:nt P.3Dplue
t.r,1-441 54rf1 r Etcc.� Sli. 5 12116i3 40196
++01-3418 3 2112 3D 11'' 12,'03 11720
^ogers JCJndla:s woae:Saund
+901-4s19O-6210 2 2112O3C i 1210 1,1!25 .. 03
San .mas, Citi of SanDia3s
2 21293E 11/26 12/03
wan Gabriel Valley Citi= S fl: 4CyA
+091-4039-2325 1 21243E 11125 12/03
.. AL uu �:ENUJR -------•,
:;ntrol Svcs -Nov
4..-'.+
,r. JLC aC'�uL'. ----.
.,
�u
�+l,A
Postage R2plen:shment
590.19
TUT; , DUE 'VENDOR --------
5uO.Y9
;:sployer PP24-Retirement
3,191.,11
::nployee PP 24 -Retirement
2,724.53
-------;
TOTAL DUE 'VENDOR ----------
14
4 Land Use Macs
64+61
-0TAL Dl,E VENDOR --------
,4.611
Recreation Refund
61.:09
"T. D sENDOR
;iJ: ! DUE --------
09
.aSSettp Recorder
316.05
- Twu JLE yE.,QOR--------.
76, 5
5u'; Piing M t g 111/21-^0acgri
20.09
TOTAL DUE VENDOR
2O.9e
MSonthly Mtg-11120/91
11.00 12/93/41 0000013235
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----;
11.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
9.20
^~+
pREpAI� ~ ^
NT
____________________________________________________________________________
:1an , 3ur�21 vI/ Tr`:j`e
~+�E�.04
Sir
'01-4090-i
Z 2i 2 0H
Lee/e Request Form.-
u8.S S
��1����2118
1 212w3C
11 2,
12t� 3
k8
Farts -Employee Evaluation
31.7S
^0�1-4090-2110
2 212'3C
25
12i ?3
,u5 �"j
Stationary Suoule»
lu.0o
10TAL DUE VENDOR ----
251.76
So Ca Assoc. oi Code
S�LEJ
+001-42110'2315
1 21203C
L1/25
12/88
Mow prship-AL Flores
T3T Ail DUE »EADOR ---->
25.0
Southern Ca. Edison
-3oCaEd`son
+001-4316-2126
1 2l03C
I1/25
112�03
Oct Eloctr4c-Man\e Hill
386.63
*01-4328-2126
1 21203C
11/25
12/�3
Oct Electric-Summi0idOe
162.2S
+01-4331-2126
1 2120311-
11/25
12/83
Oct Electric -Sycamore
222.75
lOTAL DU[ 14EN0]R ---->
771.63
5uut*ern Ca. Edison
Z,oC8Eu15on
*141'454i-21126
1 21Z03U
n!/25
12/03
Oct -Elect Dist 141
66.17
7OTAL DDE VENDOR ---->
66.1/
�outhern Ca. Edison
SoCaEJisoo
`138-4S38-2126
� 21�03D
11/2S
12/03
G�t-ELectnc Dist :30
182.97
r�� �� ��� ---->
182.97
Southern Ca. Edison
SocaEo`sun
*139-4S R -2L26
1 212030
7,1/2S
12'�;]
Uct'Electr,,c Did 11.9
1SM7
7OTA' DUE ----->
11S0.S/
Southern Ca. Edison
SuCaEdisno
^01-46S6'2126
1 2123C
11/25
12/0,3
Oct-Tr8c Cuntrl
3.705.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------>
3`705.86
Standard Insurance of
Ore StandardIo
^001-2110'1005
1 21203D
111/2S
12113
Suop Llie Ins -Dec
72.00
TOTaL Ub[ YEN0U8 ----->
72.04
r.
aA7ro4 P �. 1"_ .C, t
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
;`_ate of =A ::ti,_e Stat.E?:erg
±0101-444'4-2344 2 212:'30
2,3es •_ Sales
+225-4510-6412 �Si?2 - 212030
3Lc��4-4�1''��-0412 +15142 3 2:243D
4.225-4519-6412 05192 S 21203D
.� SQrint
+��•+1-451§-21?5
_initec Way
+i;01-2110-'..'414
::5tipr,nr
1 212930
unitedWav
1 212030
.n.'- —i ty Extension Jni;Evt
+0r1-4210-2330 2 212030 01!1234
�'nccal �'nocal
+00,1-4219-2310 212031
st01-4ejO-2310 S 212930
Vomar Products, Inc. Vawmar
f&K -44+10-1200 + 21293C 91i11S9
4alnut Valley Unified wVUSD
+001-4990-2149 2 21203E
T,,-', R.
- ..
11 25
'2+e3
S"9942
E Trffc Signal -Grand
2S
12, 3
5:'1344
-rft. = i al -Brand
2,229.44
25
12_x;3
5+11345
7r.._ Signal -„rand
3,2'2.31
1l 25
121'3
_one .'i 5t Phone Scv-Engr
27.69
-n*1 --------'
AL J VENDOR �NL R
=1.b
1:1'25
12%03
.Wav .Cent^id ?P14-24
217. SO
TOTAL LE iENDOR--------
;J
I 4
2iL
11/25
1210.3
715354
Szminar tae Act-Lungu
160.00
CTRL ,LCE 'VENDOR --------':
'_-49.00
11;25
12%93
288786
Feel -pi np
19.£'9
115
12:03
dQ,@6 4
sa;-n' qT
I'3.ip2
_.
1ir25
12:^3
481940ow
Nameplate Lettering
2'42.61
T IAL DUE VENDOR --------
2K.61
11i25
121K
#Itg Roan -Sept Rplcant Chk
46.29 12/93'91 0999913234
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----s
96.99
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---_-___;
9.99
-N 7":
; , + Dpi_
a[ a._er
i'd?';!1-431.67-K26
2 21 ME
i1%LCY
12f 03
}251-4319-':726
.21223E
N�nO�}�il
1t;23
}0,�,i-4314-2123
2 212KE
.'!11�
.al^Ut dl', .ate:
+21-4328-2126
2 212?3E
;2
12; 53
}ny�1-4�'"�-�14'� 1
_.�:_�
.. << ...... -='�
c _ --- 'at."-"- ite-'� '.:t
'>'•r';!
c="
W, a: but , i4 Jaier D s
'S'ira 2 �'. i
. •� .��-L LiJ �
�- . L
... �
2 .r 2";
ater Disc tt39-ver,: Nov
9.464.45
0 DUE 'dEN L,
,4u .a5
Walnut Vlv Mater Dist
'd`laterE
q-11-21; 2
}t3?-:�:26 �
212 L
c..3_
:i; 2h 1%i� 7
f F
'�aer •.s 939-'vzR%Nry
6,459.3
'.3-. DhE VENDOR --------,
6,459.03
4aln ar
ut viy 'fat.. L:.t
; , + Dpi_
a[ a._er
i'd?';!1-431.67-K26
2 21 ME
i1%LCY
12f 03
}251-4319-':726
.21223E
L
1t;23
}0,�,i-4314-2123
2 212KE
i1126
12m3
+21-4328-2126
2 212?3E
;2
12; 53
+2di-4331-2126
2 2 1M
kJoods. Florence L. 1 +
0'21-3479 _ =1223C LLr25 12'2;
4ater-MaRle r:11 "Prk 1,124.47
a+ater-Paul Brow Prk 1.623.65
Tater-Petersen Prk. 2 948.45
;Dater-5u,nmitrdge Prk 2,185.62
4ater-5dcasrre Can Prk 1,700.57
'AL DUE ;ENDOR-------- 9.562J4
?e�reaticn Reiund 33.20
iTAL DUE VENDCR--------. 73,20
"CTAL PREPAi0---------- 41,9x6.00
TOTAL DUE ---------------% 511,301.24
TOTAL PEPORT------------1 553.207.24
�L:F
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i'J IL
-.,�.T �yJ R_.0+!yiw E :C'iSE .. =`�Jk �''i C
Qt`i��i:Jt
t'"='4'._
BALLAD 331 FJnC
'9 L 'L.AU 339 F nd1....3'.,.
15. n;'...
cluna
r,?T�
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA NO. r
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant
TITLE:
Treasurer's Report - October 31, 1991
SUMMARY:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for
the month of October 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and approve.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
X Staff Report
Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
Public Hearing Notification
Bid Spec. (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Robert L. Va i
City Manager
F:\WP51\AGENDA\COVER.FRM
4w4t,�, e- 4&
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manag
Yes_ No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
(Department ad)
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement - October 31, 1991
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Per City policy, the Finance department presents the monthly Treasurer's
Statement for the City Council's review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the October, 1991 Treasurer's Statement.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement
for the month of October 1991. This statement shows the cash balances
for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances and
investment account balances.
PREPARED BY:
Linda G. Magnuson
F:\WP51\WORK\AGENDA\AGE-RPT.FRM
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
October 31, 1991
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT $114,258.85
PAYROLL ACCOUNT 304.52
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
TIME CERTIFICATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER
L.A.I. F.
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
$0.00
0.00
9,201,019.25
$115,063.37
9,201,019.25
TOTAL CASH $9,316,082.62
BEGINNING
TRANSFERS
ENDING
FUND
BALANCE
RECEIPTS
DISBURSEMENTS IN (OUT)
BALANCE
GENERAL FUND
$5,077,284.02
$716,243.71
$632,360.03
$5,161,167.70
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
43,736.81
22,270.65
66,007.46
GAS TAX FUND
1,770,662.92
250,991.15
2,197.78
2,019,456.29
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
567,106.63
26,888.05
1,000.00
592,994.68
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FD
0.00
FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND
0.00
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
10,395.50
7,054.53
11,389.83
6,060.20
AIR QUALITY IMPRVMNT FD
3,552.00
3,552.00
STATE PARK GRANT FUND
0.00
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
13,514.79
34,445.48
51,687.42
(3,727.15)
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
191,222.56
3,656.06
20,880.62
173,998.00
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
60,796.47
1,388.90
2,137.65
60,047.72
GRAND AV CONST FUND
587,635.55
2,128.97
585,506.58
TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE FD
332,407.37
332,407.37
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
54,401.90
795.08
55,196.98
SB 821 FUND
19,117.60
328.95
19,446.55
SELF INSURANCE FUND
239,835.09
4,133.15
243,968.24
TOTALS
$8,968,117.21
$1,071,747.71
$723,78230 $0.00
$9,316,082.62
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT $114,258.85
PAYROLL ACCOUNT 304.52
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
TIME CERTIFICATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER
L.A.I. F.
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
$0.00
0.00
9,201,019.25
$115,063.37
9,201,019.25
TOTAL CASH $9,316,082.62
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 10, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Chavers called the meeting to order at
6:30 p.m. at the Diamond Bar Library, 1061 South
Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Chairman Chavers.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Fritz, Ortiz, Vice Chairman Gravdahl,
and Chairman Chavers. Commissioner Beke arrived at
6:35 p.m.
Also present were City Engineer Sid Mousavi,
Administrative Analyst Tseday Aberra, Associate
Engineer David Liu, Engineer Technician Ann Garvey,
Sergeant Rawlings, Lieutenant Muravez, and Contract
Secretary Liz Myers.
MINUTES:
Sept. 12, 1991 Motion was made by C/Ortiz, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept the Minutes of
September 12, 1991.
COMMISSION C/Ortiz informed the Commission that he received a
COMMENTS: letter from Diane Ingram, 21647 E. High Bluff,
indicating that the light phase at Cold
Springs/Diamond Bar Blvd., eastbound, is too short
to allow for easy crossing for both pedestrians and
motorists. C/Ortiz stated that, after observing
the area between the hours of 2:00 to 3:00 p.m., he
felt that there was ample time between light
changes. He suggested, however, that a survey be
done, and the findings reported back to Ms. Ingram.
C/Ortiz, referring to a letter received from Dale
Ferr, 513 Rock Ridge, regarding the traffic problem
at the Lorbeer Junior High School, concurred with
Mr. Dale's suggestion to place a "No Left Turn" or
"U Turn" at the median in the school vicinity. He
suggested that the engineer do a survey of the
area.
C/Beke arrived at 6:35 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Tom Manuel, principal of Golden Springs Elementary
School, located at 245 S. Ballena Blvd, stated that
a traffic study was conducted last year assessing
the traffic problem at the school. The three
recommendations made were: paint the curbs white,
in front of the school on Ballena Blvd; post signs
indicating no parking in the white curb area
between 7:00 a. m. to 4:00 p.m.; and post "No U
Turns" signs at each corner of Ballena Blvd. He
requested that the recommendations be completed.
He further requested the installation of two
crosswalks at the back of the school.
October 10, 1991
Page 2
Chair/Chavers requested that the Sheriff Department
talk with the group of parents that are assisting
with the traffic problem to assure that they know
what they are doing. He then inquired if staff
could pursue the recommendations made without
further input from the Commission.
CE/Mousavi stated that, with the exception of the
crosswalk, staff can administratively do the
recommendations, if they are warranted, and there
is no objection by the Commission. However, there
needs to be further discussion, regarding future
liability issues, before the crosswalks can be
implemented.
Chair/Chavers requested, with the consensus of the
Commission, that staff do the indicated
recommendations, and bring back the crosswalk
information at the next Commission meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Chair/Chavers requested items A and D be pulled
from the Consent Calendar, and moved to New
Business.
C/Beke requested item C be pulled from the Consent
Calendar, and moved to New Business.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept item B of the
Consent Calendar.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, Ortiz,
G r a v d a h l, a n d
Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
NEW BUSINESS:
Request for Stop CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
Control: Maple request to install stop signs at the intersections
Hill/Butternut of Mountain Laurel Way/Butternut Way, and Mountain
Way at Laurel Way/Maple Hill Road. Staff recommended that
Mt. Laurel a warrant study be conducted on the intersection of
Mountain Laurel Way and Maple Hill Road, and that
the request for a stop sign at Butternut Way and
Mountain Laurel be denied at this time.
John Vanderkruik, residing at 22802 Mountain Laurel
Way, presented photos, and indicated that the
crosswalk's present location, Mountain Laurel and
Spruce Tree, is inadequate due to poor visibility
of both drivers and pedestrians. He suggested that
October 10, 1991 Page 3
the crosswalk be moved to the Butternut and
Mountain Laurel Way intersection. He also stated
his concern for the speeding on Mountain Laurel
Way.
Ben Aiken, residing at 2231 Mountain Laurel Way,
stated that two kids were "lost" at that crosswalk.
C/Beke concurred with staff's recommendations, and
further suggested that staff review the indicated
crosswalk to determine if there is a need to move
it.
Joe Larutta, residing at 2546 Sunbright Drive,
recommended that the crosswalk be moved and a stop
sign be installed in it's place.
Lucy Rude, residing at 22716 Mountain Laurel Way,
stated that there are many speeders on Mountain
Laurel Way.
Chair/Chavers requested that the Sheriff's
Department obtain statistics on accidents on
Mountain Laurel Way.
Penny Sorrels, residing at 1525 S. Pecan Drove,
inquired if the Sheriff Department could also note
the number of speeding tickets written.
Sgt. Rawlings, anticipating the request, informed
the Commission that he has the statistics at hand.
As of July 1, 1990 to the present date, there has
been 310 citations written, in which 290 were for
excessive speed. There were 5 reported collisions
within the same time period.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by C/Fritz and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to conduct a
warrant study on the intersection of Mountain
Laurel Way and Maple Hill Road; deny the request
for a stop sign at Butternut Way and Mountain
Laurel; and direct staff to investigate the
crosswalk situation, and investigate a means to
move the crosswalk from Spruce Tree/Mountain Laurel
Way to another location. Staff should also
investigate the geometric constraints, and the site
distances.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, Ortiz,
G r a v d a h 1 a n d
Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
October 10, 1991 Page 9
Signal Warrant Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
Study: and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to proceed
Diamond Bar with the warrant study, and incorporate the
Blvd./Silver accident information, received from the Sheriff's
Hawk Department, into the survey.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, Ortiz,
G r a v d a h l a n d
Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
Request for CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
Temp. Parking request made by the Evangelical Free Church to be
on Diamond allowed temporary parking on Diamond Bar Blvd.,
Bar Blvd. Sunday, October 20, 1991 between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 12:00 p.m.
Mark Harper, pastor of the Evangelical Free Church,
requested permission to park on the north side of
Diamond Bar Blvd. during the specified date and
time.
C/Beke requested that a condition of approval be
that the signs are covered up during the stated
period of time.
CE/Mousavi stated that, with the Commission's
approval, staff will administratively handle that
condition with the applicant.
Motion was made by C/Ortiz, seconded by
Chair/Chavers and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to accept
staff's recommendation.
Overnight CE/Mousavi addressed the Commission regarding the
Parking request made by citizens to prohibit overnight
parking within the City of Diamond Bar. Upon
incorporation, the City adopted all County Codes
and ordinances by reference. To date, the City of
Diamond Bar has not enforced the overnight parking
ordinance. In order for the Walnut Sheriff
Department to enforce the code, the City Council
must approve an enforcement policy. Staff
suggested that the Commission discuss and comment
upon this issue, which is to be forwarded to the
City Council. It is recommended that the
Commission direct staff as necessary.
Al Rumpilla, residing at 23958 Golden Springs Dr.,
representing the Gadfly Association and himself,
opposed the idea of an ordinance for the following
reasons: he moved to Diamond Bar parking was
allowed in front of his home; it is an unfair way
to generate revenue; most residents of Diamond Bar
October 10, 1991 Page 5
would not be able to obtain a permit as stated in
Section 11.11D; and to attempt to enact this law
would only cause greater problems and ill feeling
among the residents of Diamond Bar. He presented a
petition signed by approximately 300 residents
opposing such an ordinance to prohibit parking on
the street. He requested that the document be
recorded as a formal protest.
Frank Dursa, residing at 2533 Harmony Hill Dr.,
read a portion of a letter written by Todd Rulin,
opposing the idea of eliminating public parking.
He submitted the letter to the Commission. Mr.
Dursa made the following comments: approximately
6,000 cars are parked on the streets; he noted the
amount of public response opposing such an
ordinance compared to the 34 complaining residents
who are in favor of it; if the ordinance is
enacted, where would the cars be parked; and as
time goes on, there will be less and less
privileges in Diamond Bar.
Anthony Danchio, residing at 304 Ballena Dr.,
commented that the complaints of RV parking is a
communication problem, not a problem necessitating
an ordinance.
Jim Paul, residing at 1269 Latina Dr., a candidate
for the City Council, opposed the ordinance because
it would impact the people who can least afford it.
Joe Larida, resident, suggested that the code
should be left as it is.
Don Ziegler, residing at 2634 Rising Star Dr.,
stated that it would be improper to enact such an
ordinance if it is based upon receiving additional
revenue for the City.
Dwayne Beg, representing 400 homeowners located on
Brea Canyon, Lycoming, and Golden Springs, inquired
where the additional cars would be parked if
parking is prohibited on the street.
Ernest Dicacus, residing at 21157 Silver Cloud Dr.,
stated that his family must park their cars on the
street because each of the six adults have a car.
Greg Hoffman, residing at 204 Ballena, member of a
fraternity at Cal Poly, pointed out that such an
ordinance would indirectly encourage drunk driving.
A car must be left on the street if an individual
is to stay overnight due to excessive drinking.
October 10, 1991 Page 6
Keith Kundee, residing at Harmony Hill Dr., stated
that the ordinance seems like a reason for
collecting money for the City.
Brenda Chaves, residing at 2464 Harmony Hill Dr.,
stated that such an ordinance would create further
expenses, as well as hinder the people's freedom of
choice.
Chair/Chavers reminded the audience that there is
no proposal, or ordinance, on the table. Staff
felt it was important to provide a public forum for
this issue because there was concern raised by
enough citizens.
Ken Upton, resident, requested that the Commission
state their opinion so he knows how to vote come
election time.
Greg Cullin, residing at 1118 Lycoming Dr., pointed
out that those citizens who made the complaint are
objecting to motor homes because it hinders their
ability to speed in the area.
Richard Frankstein, residing at 2105 Chestnut Creek
Rd., stated that he has three cars in his family
and needs to park on the street.
Richard Harnest, residing at 443 Palos, inquired
about the 72 hour rule in the code.
Lte. Muravez explained that the theory behind the
LA County ordinance is to protect vehicles parked
on the street from wrong doing, and to prevent
people from using the street as a parking lot.
There is an ordinance that prohibits parking of a
vehicle on a street for more than 72 consecutive
hours, also designed to prevent people from using
the street as a parking lot.
Joe Anderson, residing on Pasado Dr., stated that
the whole issue is unrealistic.
Bob Park , residing at 1151 Overlook Ridge, stated
that he will park on his lawn if he can't park on
the street.
Mark Tegmier, residing on Regenee Dr., inquired how
charging a permit fee of $50.00 is going to make it
safer for parking on the street.
October 10, 1991 Page 7
C/Beke recommended that the Commission suggest to
the City Council that, if they choose to undertake
such a policy, there should be an election on the
matter.
C/Fritz stated that he is not inclined to change
the code and suggested to leave it as is. Specific
areas need parking control but they can be dealt
with on a case by case bases.
C/Ortiz stated that he opposed the code completely.
VC/Gravdahl stated that, with the information
provided, he would have to vote "no" on this issue.
Chair/Chavers concurred with C/Fritz's statement
that if there is a specific parking problem, it can
be studied on a specific basis. There is nothing
at the moment that suggests that a City wide
enforcement of a new ordinance, or an existing
ordinance, is necessary.
VC/Gravdahl suggested that families with motor
homes, boats, cars with expired license plates,
etc., talk to their neighbors and attempt to
resolve this problem.
Motion was made by C/Ortiz, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to
recommend to the City Council that there be no
change in the existing ordinance and the
enforcement policy. The names on the petition
submitted by the Gadfly Association is to be
provided to the City Council.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Fritz, Ortiz,
G r a v d a h l a n d
Chair/Chavers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
OLD BUSINESS:
Priority List Don Greely, President of Diamond Bar Country Estate
Association, inquired where the signal at Shadow
Canyon/Diamond Bar Blvd. stands on the Priority
List.
October 10, 1991 Page 8
CE/Mousavi explained that staff was directed, at
the September 12, 1991 meeting, to develop two
Priority Lists which would prioritize intersections
for warrant studies, and for traffic signal
installation once they are warranted. Staff has
provided two lists intended to give a guideline as
to which, and how, intersections should be
prioritized and recommended to the City Council for
funding. He explained that the intersection of
Shadow Canyon and Diamond Bar Blvd. has been
warranted. Staff is currently working with the
development community, as well as "The Country", to
find out if they will participate with the City for
part of the costs, so as to develop a scenario for
the installation of a signal at that specific
location.
C/Beke noted that Golden Springs Rd./Racquet Club
Rd. is also a private street teeing into a public
street, just as Diamond Bar Blvd./Shadow Canyon.
However, it was decided not to proceed with a
warrant study until they could provide the
Commission with proof of funding for the signal, if
it is deemed warranted. He suggested that the
Shadow Canyon/Diamond Bar Blvd. signal should be
installed when "The Country" is willing to pay 100%
of the costs. There is no reason for the public
agency to pay for the signal of a private road.
CE/Mousavi suggested that the issue of how to
install signals, when it enters into a private
community, is a policy item.
C/Beke suggested that this policy item be placed on
the agenda for the next meeting.
C/Fritz suggested that the folks at the Racquet
Club be notified.
C/Beke stated that Diamond Bar Blvd./Silverhawk
should be placed on the top priority list, since
the Commission has agreed to proceed with a warrant
study.
VC/Gravdahl suggested that consideration of Shadow
Canyon Rd./Diamond Bar Blvd. and Golden Springs
Rd./Racquet Club Rd. be deferred until there has
been a decision on the policy.
Chair/Chavers inquired what was the criteria used
for establishing the priority list. He suggested
that the matter be tabled until there is more
complete documentation from staff.
October 10, 1991
ADJOURNMENT:
Page 9
Don Greely pointed out that a policy has already
been established by the installation of the signal
at the Grand entrance to "The Country", which was
paid for by the funding received from the
negotiations with San Bernardino County. He
suggested that the signal at Diamond Bar
Blvd./Shadow Canyon Rd. be paid for with that
funding.
CE/Mousavi explained that the funds from that
negotiation had to be spent only on Grand Avenue.
Motion was made by C/Beke, seconded by VC/Gravdahl
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to defer further discussion
on category 1 & 2, with regard to prioritization,
until the next meeting; direct staff to come back
with a recommendation on policy for participation
of the signal on private/public street
intersection; and direct staff to bring back the
criteria by which category 1 & 2 is being
developed.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Beke, Ortiz, Fritz,
G r a v d a h l a n d
Chair/Chavers.
None.
None.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Motion was made by C/Ortiz, seconded by C/Fritz and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 8:45
p.m. and continue the agenda to the next meeting.
Respectively,
/s/ Sid Mousavi
Sid Mousavi
Secretary/Traffic and Transportation
Attest:
/s/ Todd Chavers
Todd Chavers
Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 24, 1991
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
OLD BUSINESS:
vice Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order
at 7:00 p.m. at the Community Room, 1061 Grand
Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
Commissioner Meyer.
Commissioners Plunk, Stitt, Meyer, and vice
Chairman Ruzicka. Chairman Whelan was absent.
Also present were Assistant City Manager Terrence
Belanger, Administrative Assistant Kellee Fritzal,
Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel and
Recreation Supervisor Bob Rose.
C/Meyer requested that the Minutes of October 10,
1991 be pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Motion was made by C/Plunk, seconded by C/Stitt and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar.
Motion was made by C/Plunk, seconded by C/Stitt and
CARRIED to approve the Minutes of October 10, 1991.
C/Meyer abstained.
General Plan ACM/Belanger reported that the General Plan
Review Advisory Committee (GPAC) will refer the General
Plan back to the Planning Commission once the final
revisions to the document have been made. After
the Planning Commission receives the General Plan,
the Parks and Recreation Commission will also
review the plan. It is unlikely that there will be
significant changes made to the Parks and
Recreation aspects of the General Plan. However,
there may be some revision made to the open space
designations. It is recommended that the
Commission receive and file the information
concerning the purpose of the General Plan, until
the Commission undertakes its review of the plan.
Adopt -A -Park ACM/Belanger reported that staff, per the
Commission's request, surveyed several cities in
the Los Angeles and Orange County area; regarding
Adopt -A -Park programs and, has developed a brief
synopsis on the various ways Adopt -A -Park programs
are conducted. It is recommended that the
Commission review the information provided, and
direct staff as necessary.
October 24, 1991 Page 2
C/Plunk agreed to Chair the Adopt -A -Park sub-
committee. She proposed that the first step would
be to survey various groups within the community to
determine where their interests would lie regarding
the different Adopt -A -Park formats suggested by
staff.
ACM/Belanger indicated that staff would work with
C/Plunk to develop a brief survey to distribute to
all the identifiable service groups in the
community.
VC/Ruzicka stated that, for the record, the
Commission concurs that there is now an Adopt -A -
Park sub -committee of the Parks and Recreation
Commission that will be chaired by C/Plunk.
Park Use Policy ACM/Belanger explained that there were
complications in printing out the Park Use Policy
document. It is recommended that discussion of the
Park Use Policy be continued to the next meeting.
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Stitt and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter to the
next meeting.
PRESENTATIONS:
Peterson Park
Charles Good -man, architect for the concession
Conceptual Plan
stand proposed for Peterson Park, addressed the
for a Concession
Commission with information regarding two possible
Stand
sites. He presented information regarding Site A
(the original proposed site). The site (Site A)
would be located adjacent to the existing restroom
facility. It woud be designed to be a single story
structure. The structure would tie into the
existing utility facilities. Mr. Good -man
presented the following information regarding Site
B (an alternate site). The site (Site B) would be
located adjacent to the existing flag pole area.
Mr. Good -man indicated that Site B may be a better
site architecturally. Mr. Good -man indicated that
there would be a difference of about $35,500
between the Site A and Site B costs. He requested
guidance from the Commission on how to proceed with
the project.
C/Plunk noted that Site B is located further from
the restroom making it more difficult for parents
to keep track of small children going to the
restroom and the concession stand.
October 24, 1991 Page 3
Mr. Good -man, responding to C/Stitt's comment,
stated that Site B could not be phased. However,
the structure on Site A could be phased by building
the structure first, and then adding the fixtures
at a later date.
C/Stitt stated that, because the proximity of the
concession stand to the restrooms are more
convenient, and the proposal could be implemented
in phases, Site A is the most feasible proposal.
VC/Ruzicka inquired if other alternatives have been
explored.
ACM/Belanger stated that regardless of which
alternative is proposed, there would be a question
related to the equipment. In either case, the
project would go back to the City Council for
discussion regarding additional monies.
C/Plunk suggested asking the user groups which site
would be preferable. They may be willing to pay
the difference if Site B is desired.
C/Meyer stated that since the project has been
budgeted for $30,000, he would recommend Site A.
The design analysis should be within the budgetary
constraints, and include options for potential
expansion. Site B could be considered as a future
project, or a long range type of expansion.
VC/Ruzicka stated that a long term decision should
be made to assure that the City gets a project that
is desirable now, and in the future.
ACM/Belanger suggested that the Commission may want
to go to the site in order to better visualize the
proposed projects.
VC/Ruzicka, with the consensus of the Commission,
tabled the matter to the next meeting. Each
Commissioner should make arrangements with staff,
and the architect, to visit the site, and review
any technical matters.
NEW BUSINESS:
Park Light ACM/Belanger addressed the Commission regarding the
Policy Park Light Policy. He explained that Heritage Park
is the only athletic field that has lights, and it
is utilized by every sports group in the City of
Diamond Bar. In the past, there has been problems
with the way the lights have been operated. As a
result, a lighting policy has been proposed which
October 24, 1991
Page 4
would address the lighting problems occurring.
There are two alternatives for light usage at
Heritage Park: 1) Hand out keys to the User groups
and allow them to turn on and off the lights, as
specified in the Parks Use Policy; or 2) Require
recreation staff to be present to turn on and off
the lights, the user groups would be charged staff
costs. It is staff's recommendation that
alternative 1 be established as the lighting
policy.
The Commission concurred with staff's
recommendation.
Mad Dog Tennis Mad Dog Tennis, a private business, has requested
the use of the City's public tennis courts to
conduct private lessons.
C/Stitt suggested that a letter be prepared
communicating to Mad Dog Tennis that Diamond Bar is
emphatically not interested in this type of
program.
Motion was made by C/Stitt, seconded by C/Plunk and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to deny the request for use of
the City's public tennis courts for private
lessons.
WOW*) Tyk"CWIF
Park Grant ACM/Belanger addressed the Commission regarding the
Application Park Grant Application for Pantera Park and Diamond
Bar Community Park. He made the following comments
regarding the plan for The Diamond Bar Community
Park: there would be approximately 24 acres
developed that would provide a wide variety of
active and passive recreation uses; the location is
easily accessible both regionally and locally; by
converting this property to open space recreation
use, 28 acres are preserved that might have other-
wise have been used for residential development;
the proposed project will cost approximately $12
million. He made the following comments regarding
the plan for Pantera Park: there is approximately
23 acres, of which 7 acres would remain as natural
open space; the balance of the site, approximate 16
acres, would be developed as active and passive
recreation uses; the proposed project will cost
approximately $6 million dollars; and there may be
an opportunity to join this property with the
development of the Tres Hermanos Ranch area. The
City is in the process of contacting all the
community groups, indicated in the grant, to get
letters of support, as well as contacting other
October 24, 1991 Page 5
public agencies, in the immediate area, to get
their support in terms of the regional aspects of
these two sites. The ballot is up for vote June of
1992. ACM/Belanger explained that the reason for
developing the schematic plans, before receiving
input on the designs, was to be able to develop a
budget in order to submit a grant application.
When it comes time to create the Master Plan of
Parks, it will be staff's proposal to do it in a
similar fashion.
Recreation RS/Rose informed the Commission that the following
Update programs have been successful: Cruise to Ensenada;
Heritage Park Youth Flag Football; Adult Sports
program; Tiny Tots; and the Contract Classes. He
stated that the School District has been quite
flexible in accommodating the extra contract
classes.
ACM/Belanger stated that the City has been working
with the Pomona Unified School District for the
purpose of scheduling the outdoor athletic
facility, and schedule their school facilities for
contract classes.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Staff ACM/Belanger stated that the Diamond Bar Little
League has written a letter to the Walnut Valley
School Board, and the Superintendent, regarding the
field use fees.
ACM/Belanger stated that beginning January of 1992,
the Commission's regular meeting will be held at
the AQMD Hearing Room. The first meeting will
still be held at City Hall.
Commission C/Plunk stated that there has been discussion,
within the community, suggesting that it might be
beneficial to discuss, with our neighbors, to
mutually develop the land along the perimeters.
ACM/Belanger stated that, next Tuesday, the City
Council will be considering the approval of the
cooperative agreement to specifically plan the Tres
Hermanos Ranch area.
October 24, 1991 Page 6
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Stitt and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 8:35
p.m.
Respectively,
/s/ Terrence L. Belanger
Terrence Belanger,
Secretary
Attest:
/ s / Jne Ruzicka
Joe Ruzicka
Vice Chairman
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.7
No Documentation available at this time
4
CTTV OF T)TAMOND Mk
AC hNIJA KhFUK1 AGENDA NO.
TO: Mayor and City Council
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 19, 1991
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
TITLE: Transmittal of Final Audit Report for year ended June 30, 1991.
SUMMARY: The accounting firm of Thomas, Byrne & Smith has been retained as auditors for the City of
Diamond Bar. In conjunction with this service, a Final Audit Report for FY 90-91 is being
transmitted.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file Final Audit Report for FY 90-91 as prepared by Thomas, Byrne
& Smith.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report
Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
X Other Final Audit Report FY 90-91
1, Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
N/A _ Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
N/A _ Yes _ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
N/A Yes No
Which Commission?
_ _
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
N/A Yes No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
_ _
REV ED BY -
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
(Department Head)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. }
I, CHARLES WEISSBURD, Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, do hereby
certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the
Votes Cast for all candidates for the two offices of Member of
the City Council at the DIAMOND BAR CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION held on November 5, 1991.
I further certify that the total Ballots Cast at the
DIAMOND BAR CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION are as follows:
PRECINCT
BALLOTS CAST
3,659
ABSENTEE
BALLOTS CAST
1,146
TOTAL
BALLOTS CAST
4,805
I further certify that the total votes cast for the
two offices of Member of the City Council are as follows:
Member of the
PRECINCT
ABSENTEE
TOTAL
City Council
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
THOMAS F. ORTIZ
699
176
875
LAVINIA ROWLAND
1,030
305
1,335
PHYLLIS PAPEN
1,193
433
1,626
JIM PAUL
735
230
965
GARY G. MILLER
1,130
382
1,512
CLAIR W. HARMONY
1,171
266
1,437
DON NARDELLA
672
250
922
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed my seal this 25th day of November, 1991.
( =! �". & .. \N '%��
CHARLES WEISSBURD
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
County of Los Angeles
EXHIBIT "A"
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS
NOVEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 23.1
iJ
OFFICIAL
iJ-,
J J
Q a a a J J
2 CC p C 2 >-
W W ZW 1 1
z z a z z z z�
F""
a
zW OZZW
W i -W JW W W W W W
c�aac�a3c�aac�a (72JUattCW7a�
U
W O W O W a W J
a'm �mtt a'ma�m �mH�oW02�mw
asWas as afJasss
uj asp 1
mf(/1m�,Qi m W Inm W O mw maw3 mwR i
s a
O
J
J
O Jap J -j
'Z�-.�Z..?Z��pJap�Op��p�Z
Zti Z�>-Z�--��ZH
a
OUOOU>OU>OV�OU�OUaOVZ
fzxzzaszxxz�- xzaszJfzo
m
a0 a0J< 0a; � �a�a<:o �p
-0
i
DIAMOND BAR
�� as p0 ..o .p o
p V o U o U
DIAMOND BAR
1780006A
1780007A
18
13
5 5 41 4 6 2
DIAMOND BAR
1780008A
231
61
2
51 41
DIAMOND BAR
DIAMOND BAR
DIAMOND
1780011A
17SW14A
25ii
9 2 6 8_
4 5 53 4i1 5 3 1
i 41 5 �
BAR
178=1A
18�
� 1 1 4
21 7?J
DIAMOND BAR
1780044A
20C�
17 99 6 5� I 1
3 49 611 30
DIAMOND BAR
DIAMOND BAR
1780063A
1780065A
2571
1 9d
q 8 5
7 54� 5
1
1911
2q g8 52
59
DIAMOND BAR
DIAM[TD BAR
17800MA
178007pA
165
57 39
411 49
7 61� 3
;
DIAMOND BAR
178M72A
211
53t 3
I
DIAMOND BAR
1780075A
133
i 91 531 4 41 3
2Q 3 3551
f
DIAMOND BAR
DIAMOND BAR
1780078A
1780079A
27�
6
5 i 13 41
DIAMOND 8AR
1780091A
9�
164
8 q1
15(��
1 1
DIAMOND BAR
1780082A
75
6 5 32
j
t
DIAMOND BAR
DIAMGNp
17 BWAtA
18
7 B 7 4
31
I
4 I
BAR
1780092A
1
3
2 201
22 2
f!I
(
'
4� 4 2 511
f i
PRECINCT VOTE
3655
I 699 11193 1130 I 67
ABSENTEE VIIT£
114
i 1 73 l 1171 I
17 43 3871 2
f
E
GRAND TOTAL VOTE
4809
i '
23� 26�
� 87162
[
�
�
133
90 151 143
922
I
I
I
I
IE
1il�i
Iiii� VIII
I
I
I
IEj I i ( I F 1
I
I I
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 23.2
z
z
(Z Izz
Z
Z
>
>
> o
h
0
0
a
a
a
Q
Q
Q
u
m w
�
w }C
OFFICIALIz
W N
-Z
W zZ
aZ
w W W
ZZ
W
z (XZ
W Z
oz
W
'
1- W ♦-
NI. C7 d'�C7�3C7�a��
W J
W W W
W W
C7 Q'J
W m
C7K d'C70'J
W Q
Q W Q
U �',, LL'm
W o
Q_'mm
W a W
W J
w a
W J..
a�LLa�
a� asJa�faf
afo.
Ln'jmW
mwamw-mwmw
mw3mWd'
H. iN
��
F�-+ fa
20
f
fa
Q! Ip JapJZOJJpJd
'Z
pJ
pJ 2'a
JZ
JI HfZ�+�-+Z�-+Jz�-+
J' pzmxz<xU}QU-oz<zz-jxzo
Z�}Zi-+�+Z�-+
;fzx�za�zxfz�-+fzafzJ�zo
mi a0E-a0Ja0aa»a�c�a0la�o
.+o
..o
o �o
CQ
..Q
-00oc)
.Q
oc�
pU
pU ❑U
C300
COUNTYWIDE
365
69S
119
11
67
1O
73�
1171
COUNTYWIDE
1140
17
43
38
2
ABSENTEE VOTE
305
23C
266
DIAMOND BAR
365q
69S
119c
i 13C
670
iO3C
7
1171
DIAMOND BAR
1140
17E
8 2
2
VOTE
3
2
26
MTSAN ANTONIO COMMUNI
365
69
ABSENTEE
11 9
11
6671
103C
m
1171
MT SAN ANTONIO CDMMUNI
114q
171E
433
382
25Q
ABSENTEE VOTE
i
23C
2
t
j
POMONA UNIFIED SCHOOL
144
253
447
461
27
52
271
3817
POMONA UNIFIED SCHOOL
35
57
12
108
ABSENTEE VOTE
i
113
70
71
I
WALNUT VALLEY UNLFIED
2211
i 441E
746669
3971
i
4
7
i
WALNUT VALLEY UNJIFIED
791
11
27
17�
ABSENTEE VOTE
�I
1
1
1
1
19
I
I
I
i
!
E
I
i
I
I
I
I
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY
OF
(Governing Body)
, that the individuals whose names, titles,
(Public Entity)
and specimen signatures appear below are hereby designated as Authorized officials and
are authorized to execute for and in behalf of , a public
entity established under the laws of the State of California, applications and documents
for the purpose of obtaining financial assistance under the Federal Civil Defense Act of
1950 as amended (Public Law 920, 81st Congress, 50 USC App. 2251-2297).
(Signature)
(Alternate Signature)
(Alternate Signature)
(Typed name and title)
(Typed name and title)
(Typed name and title)
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19
I
(Name and title)
(Name and title)
(Name and title) (Name and title)
CERTIFICATION
duly appointed and
(Name) (Title)
of , do hereby certify that the above is a true and
(Public Entity)
correct copy of a Resolution passed and approved by the
(Governing Body)
day of , 19
Of
(Public Entity)
DATE:
on
(Signature)
(Official Position)
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. _/_
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 20, 1991
FROM:Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
TITLE:
Award of contract for the purchase and installation of playground equipment within Landscape Maintenance
District #39 to MD Structural Contractors in the amount of $12,587.88.
SUMMARY:
On October 15, 1991, Council authorized staff to solicit bids for the purchase and installation of playground
equipment in the mini -park within Landscape Maintenance District #39, located at the corner of Softwind Drive
and Stardust Drive. Staff prepared plans and specifications and advertised for bids.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award the contract for purchase and installation of playground
equipment in Landscape Maintenance District #39 mini park located at Softwind Drive and Stardust Drive to
MD Structural Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $12,587.88.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:x Staff Report
Resolution(s)
Ordinances(s)
x Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed x Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? N/A —Yes _ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? N/A _ Yes _ No
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report? _ Yes x No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: N/A
VIEWED
LVB Noobert (j Terrence i
L. Belanger
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Sid J. Mousavi
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Award of contract for the purchase and installation of playground
equipment in the mini -park within Landscape Maintenance District
#39 located at Stardust Drive and Softwind Drive.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
This report requests that the City Council give authorization to award the
contract for purchase and installation of playground equipment for the mini
park located at Softwind Drive and Stardust Drive within the LMD #39.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award the contract for the purchase
and installation of playground equipment in the mini -park within Landscape
Maintenance District #39, located at Softwind Drive and Stardust Drive, to MD
Structural Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of
$12,587.88.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
MD Structural Contractors has bid $12,587.88 for the installation of
playground equipment. Staff has budgeted $20,000.00 in the Landscape
Maintenance District #39 1991-1992 Fiscal Year Budget.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On October 15, 1991, the City Council authorized staff to solicit bids for
the purchase and installation of playground equipment in the mini -park within
Landscape Maintenance District #39. Plans and specifications were purchased
by eight (8) vendors. Two (2) bids were received by the closing date. A third
bid was submitted late and as such was rejected.
PREPARED BY:
Sid J. Mousavi
SJM:CJ: ra
CARL WARREN & CO.
Insurance Adjusters
Claims Administrators
P.O. Box 25180
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5180
(714) 740-7999 FAX: (714) 740.7992
TO: City of Diamond Bar
Attention: Lynda Burgess
Date: Nov. 18, 1991
Re: Claim: Cissna vs Diamond Bar
Claimant: James & Dorothy Cissna
D/Event: 8-27-91
Rec'd Y/Office: 11-12-91
Our File: S 68380 DK/CV
We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take
the action indicated below:
CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.
j� CLAIM INSUFFICIENCY: In accordance with the telephone conversation
of , 19 , a notice of insufficiency must be mailed
to the claimant no later than , 19•THIS MUST BE
MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORIGINAL
CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SUBMIT A "REJECTION" LETTER. See
Government Code Sections 910 and or 910.2 and/or 910.4.
b AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to
the claimant, refecting this additional/amended claim.
r-1 LATE CLAIM RESPONSE: Return the original claim material to the
claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only
recourse is to file a written "Application for Leave to Present
a Late Claim". (Retain copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE MAILED
TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR
OFFICE. DO NOT SEND A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code
Section 911.4.
APPLICATION REJECTION: Reject claimant's "Application for Leave
to Present a Late Claim". See Government Code Section 911.8.
CD TAKE NO ACTION: Defer any written response to the claimant
pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.
cc: S.C.J.P.I.A.
Very truly yours,
CARLIWARREN & COMPANY
uste
RECEI'�,IED
C�Aa,r�^
Mt`Iu;1J
LAW OFFICES OF BONNIE L. STERLINCr,T
6612 Wheeler Avenue
La Verne, California 91750„ x�
(714) 593-5813
November 6, 1991
Mr. Dennis A. Tarango
Building and Safety Department
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley
Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Re: CISSNA, James and Dorothy
210 Tanforan Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Dear Mr. Taran go:
Mr. and Mrs. James Cissna at the above address have requested that
I contact you regarding the damage done to their sewer system by a
tree owned and maintained by the City of Diamond Bar.
The tree which caused the damage is growing in front of the
Cissnas' home. The roots from the tree have uprooted the sidewalk
and caused a large break in the sewer line serving the Cissnas'
home. The break caused the Cissnas to incur $2,680 in expense to
have the line repaired as evidenced by the enclosed bill. It is
our position the City is responsible for this expense incurred as
the damage was caused by its tree.
This letter is to request reimbursement in the amount of $2,680 be
awarded to the Cissnas as soon as possible, the tree be removed to
prevent any recurrence of the problem, and the sidewalk be repaired
to prevent any possible injury to others.
Please let us know the City's position on this matter in a timely
manner.
Very truly yo rs,
BONNIE L. ST LI
Enclosure y '•
ri
I
J \
LO
`77
0
> NIS
-�•�.
o is
m
0 I°
�.
0
�
IZ
01
C ) l[Y
m v< N
10 !
, y z
CD r -W V—j
<
�MZNc 3
Of
cn LO�� IC�
A
v IC N G
<Im IG -
W
U
0�
Z CV
co0
M
00
vQ��a
c yU—%D
Co v a U; c
�
z2Ln
CD C lD O V .J
d N
��QOt
WIn
I
I
1
�
%J
�J
r
N
N
v`
`U
I�
M
00
vQ��a
c yU—%D
Co v a U; c
�
z2Ln
CD C lD O V .J
d N
��QOt
WIn
I
I
1
�
%J
�J
M
00
vQ��a
c yU—%D
Co v a U; c
�
z2Ln
CD C lD O V .J
d N
��QOt
WIn
LU_ -
v Lo
CO ---- \. �\ -- - -- — --
Z CV ��_ ;� - r•�
0 on - � .�1. oa Om •-
IC J 11``
F_
M 0
ai
'� `1\,
.. ., ? V
_? a
J Q cn '�. -J ^i ° (' y - b
J Z VV
IV
m �� s
C7 coo Q M Jia°Ln
I � � I
..
iz
tj
c jQ
_ 4
Im C L ICjI='
f N
i�lml
uIC
LU
'^
Uco
�❑
a w
'
N
❑ ! ^U i�
i a C
Z
W
W j�w w
o
I
is
c �
z (7
i�lml
uIC
o a
W LO0 00
LN
1�r
� i J
r�' rfJ
7 I C—
/�
fff � _♦ O.
O d ^Ln
1
v QQ1
�
� I
c'-Qn
m
0v-
<Q
I kc
G7000� JII�_ 3
ti
'z `
CJI �
�_�--'/ < ` � � \• \ - 1 '1 ate! i, 171 � ° I z
m � _
h
J
IZ
10'
Q
IG
i
,C
LL
o
@ @'
z!
lm
Y
U 'J
�v
� 'I
I W al
lfllj
r
u
O',z
'10
12
I V
� i J
r�' rfJ
7 I C—
/�
fff � _♦ O.
O d ^Ln
1
v QQ1
�
� I
c'-Qn
m
0v-
<Q
I kc
G7000� JII�_ 3
ti
'z `
CJI �
�_�--'/ < ` � � \• \ - 1 '1 ate! i, 171 � ° I z
m � _
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. ">, '
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 26, 1991 REPORT DATE: December 3, 1991
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager
TITLE:
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California supporting the Los Angeles County
Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992.
SUMMARY:
The City of Diamond Bar submitted two park grant applications for specific park project funding through the
1992 Park Bond Act. The projects submitted were the development of Pantera Park and the acquisition and
development of Site "13". One of the requirements of the application was a City Council resolution in support
of the proposed project. The City has been notified that they are eligible to receive $2 million dollars in
development of Pantera Park, in addition to the per capita grants of $720,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve the Resolution in support of the Los Angeles County Park, Beach
and Recreation Act of 1992.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 415 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission? PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
VIEWED BY:
VIEWED
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
e
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
X Yes _ No
MAJORITY
_ Yes X No
X Yes No
Yes X No
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND
RECREATION ACT OF 1992.
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of
1992 would provide approximately $800 million to preserve, improve and restore
park, beach, mountain and open space lands, senior centers and facilities, and
recreation facilities to benefit current and future generations of Los Angeles County;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar finds that
neighborhood and community parks, natural and recreational areas, sports facilities
and playing fields are a vital and necessary part of our community and help to
preserve the quality of life in the City of Diamond Bar; and
WHEREAS, local and regional park and recreation facilities are in great
need of funds to improve park safety and security; and parks in good repair provide
an important and healthy alternative to youth in our community through sports and
other recreation opportunities; and
WHEREAS, this measure would help address the great need for repair and
improvements of the neighborhood and community parks of the City of Diamond Bar;
and
WHEREAS, senior citizens are the fastest growing age group in America
today and we need to improve existing and build new park and recreation facilities for
senior citizens throughout Los Angeles County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar would receive approximately
$720,000 in per capita grants for our most pressing park and county -wide recreation
needs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar may apply for grants from
approximately $50 million allocated for senior facilities, gang prevention, tree planting,
trails, river restoration and historical resources throughout Los Angeles County; and
WHEREAS, a county -wide and broad-based coalition of conservation,
park and recreation, civic and business groups has been formed to seek the approval
of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the voters for the Los Angeles
County Park, Beach and Recreation Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar urges the Los
Angeles County Board of Supervisors to place the Los Angeles County Park, Beach
and Recreation Act on the June 1992 county ballot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar, California, does hereby support the Los Angeles County Park, Beach
and Recreation Act of 1992.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
1991
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of
1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
CITY Or DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO.
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 22, 1991
FROM: Sid J. Mousavi, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
TITLE:
Recognition of Vic Hosler for devising a time saving tool.
SUMMARY:
Vic Hosler, Parks Maintenance Worker, has devised a tool for installing the United States flags on the Edison
light poles. The use of this tool has saved considerable staff time and reduced the City's liability exposure.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council recognize Mr. Hosler for his cost saving idea, that reduces staff time
required to install and remove flags by approximately 50%.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:x Staff Report
Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVI ED B
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
,�� 0 �-
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager
N/A _ Yes _ No
N/A
N/A _ Yes _ No
N/A Yes No
N/A _ Yes _ No
(.. �_- _���
Sid J. ivlousavi
City Engineer/Director of Public works
CIII I � N �, 1 9110-101)
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Recognition of Vic Hosler For Devising a Time Saving Tool
ISSUE STATEMENT:
City Maintenance staff installs the United States flag 4 times per year.
Previous methods of installation and removals have taken up to 160 man hours
per installation.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council recognize Mr. Vic Hosler, Parks and
Maintenance employee, for the construction of a device that eliminates the
need for using a ladder to install the United States flag on Edison street
light poles, and reduces staff time needed to install and remove flags by
approximately 50%.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The use of the device will save the City approximately 320 man hours per
year, at a savings of $5,280.00 in staff time per year.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Diamond Bar displays approximately 300 United States flags on
designated holidays. Previously, staff has installed and removed the flags
by use of a ten foot ladder. Use of a ladder was time consuming and exposed
the City to potential liability.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Vic Hosler, faced with going up and down a ladder 600 times per display,
thought a better way could be found. Using his ingenuity, he developed a
device that allows him to stand in the back of a pick-up truck and install
the flags from there, without the use of a ladder. This has resulted in a
safer and more efficient use of Diamond Bar's staff time.
PREPARED BY:
Sid J. Mousavi
SJM:CJ: ra
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 SWEARING-IN CEREMONIES
No Documentation needed for items
7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.4. and 7.5
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. ,
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 27, 1991
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager
TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Establishing City
Council Standards of Operations.
SUMMARY: The City Council previously considered and amended the draft Standards of
Operation Resolution (September 10, 1991). The staff was directed to make the suggested modifications to the
Standards of Operations Resolution and return the revised Resolution to the Council for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the City Council
Standards of Operations Resolution.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:_ Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
_ Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
X Yes
_ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
_ Yes
X No
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
, Yes
X No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Yes
X No
Which Commission?
_
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
_ Yes
X No
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
REVIEWED BY:
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
�J
Terrence L. Belanger (Department Head)
Assistant City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL STANDARDS OF OPERATION
WHEREAS, it is important to the successful operation of
any public organization that standards be established to define the
roles, responsibilities and expectations of the governing board and
staff in the operation of the organization; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of standards by the City
Council will promote understanding and trust among members of the
City Council and staff concerning their roles, responsibilities and
expectations for the operation of the City; and
WHEREAS, the establishment and periodic review of these
City Council policy standards will assist new members of the City
Council to better understand their role and responsibilities as
Councilmembers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Diamond Bar
as follows:
CITY COUNCIL NORMS OF OPERATION
Section 1. OPERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
A. In order to ensure that all members of the public have an
opportunity to speak and that the Council is able to complete
the public's business, there may be a five-minute limitation
on comments by the public unless otherwise prohibited by law.
The Mayor will be responsible for enforcing the time limits as
suggested.
B. The Council shall meet the first and third Tuesdays of each
month, commencing at 6:00 p.m. If the Council desires to
proceed past 11:30 p.m., the Council, at 11:00 p.m., will
determine which issues will be completed at that meeting and
which items will be continued to the next Tuesday meeting.
C. Public Concerns are to be scheduled for 6:00 p.m., immediately
following the Flag Salute, Roll Call and Council Comments.
D. No action is to be taken on items raised under Public
Concerns. Citizens may be requested to put concerns in
writing, if that the item(s) is to be agendized, for a later
Council meeting date, at the discretion of the Council and
City Manager.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Two
Section 1. OPERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (CONTINUED)
E. At the beginning of the meeting, if there are a number of
people requesting to speak on a particular subject under
Public Concerns, the Mayor will request that there be a
spokesperson and that the others limit their comments, speak
at the end of the meeting or contact Council or City Manager.
This does not apply to scheduled agenda items.
F. The Council will not hold a public hearing on items scheduled
under Departmental Reports or Council Concerns. If just one
or two people desire to speak on the item, the Council will
listen to their comments. If more than two persons at the
meeting desire to speak on an item, the Council will
reschedule the item as a public hearing for a following
meeting.
G. with Council approval, Mayor may schedule Council review of
agenda items out of their prescribed order on the printed
agenda if a large number of the public are present to speak on
that agenda item.
H. Significant proposed changes to City ordinances shall be set
for public hearing.
I. The Councilmember making a motion shall restate the motion
before the vote for clarification for the public and staff.
J. Councilmembers should not get into a debate with a member of
the public or staff at a Council meeting, since these debates
seldom resolve concerns and many times inflame feelings. Any
concerns by a Councilmember over the performance of a City
employee during a Council meeting should be privately directed
to the City Manager to ensure the concern is properly
addressed.
K. The City Council will, on a quarterly basis, agendize and
prioritize those significant items to be scheduled as future
Council study session topics.
L. It is not necessary for all Councilmembers to speak or give
their viewpoints on every issue or item under public hearings
and Council considerations, if their concerns are already
addressed by other Councilmembers. On critical or significant
issues, all members of Council will undoubtedly want to
indicate their opinions on the issue.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Three
Section 1. OPERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (CONTINUED)
M. If an applicant submits a new site plan for a development or
if the City Council requests changes in the submitted site
plan, the public hearing will be continued at least two weeks
to allow time for staff review.
N. Any written correspondence or other materials received at a
City Council meeting (from the public or staff) will be
documented with a receipt time and date by the City Clerk and
distribution indicated. If the City Clerk does not receive a
copy of the written submittal, it will not be considered to
have been received or acted upon by the City Council.
O. Under Council Comments, items of major importance will be
addressed during the first part of the Council meeting. The
more routine items will be addressed at the end of the Council
meeting.
Section 2. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS CITY COMMISSIONS AND PRESS
RELATIONS
A. Individual Councilmembers will have the right to attend
meetings but are cautioned about becoming involved in the
meeting's discussions and/or violating the Brown Act.
B. Written committee reports will be given to the Council on
significant committee recommendations and/or actions.
C. New ideas or suggested programs will be presented to the full
Council before presenting to the media.
Section 3. COUNCILMEMBER PRESENTATIONS AT OTHER AGENCIES AND
GROUPS
A. If a member of the City Council represents the City before
another governmental agency, organization, the Councilmember
will first indicate the majority position of the Council.
Personal opinions and comments may be expressed only if the
Councilmember clarifies that these statements do not represent
the position of the City Council.
Section 4. CITY COUNCIL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CITY STAFF
A. There will be mutual respect from both staff and Council -
members of their respective roles and responsibilities, when
expressing criticism in public session.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Four
Section 4. CITY COUNCIL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CITY STAFF (CONT.)
B. In public session, City staff members will address Council
members, utilizing Mayor, Councilman or Councilwoman; and,
Council members will address all staff members, utilizing Mr.
or Ms. rather than the person's first names.
C. City staff acknowledge that the Council is the City's policy
making body. The City Council acknowledges that staff
administers the Council's policies.
D. The Council, as the overall policy body, holds the City
Manager responsible for the administration of the City
Departments. The overall internal administration by the City
Manager is necessary in order to assure efficient and economic
operations of the various departments per Council direction.
The practices of each department are subject to review and
approval by the City Manager.
E. The Council will direct staff through the City Manager on all
major or new issues.
F. A Councilmember will not direct staff to initiate any action
or prepare any report that is significant in nature or
initiate any project or study without the approval of a
majority of the City Council.
G. All written informational material requested by individual
Councilmembers will be submitted by staff to all Council -
members with the notation indicating which Councilmember
requested the information.
H. Council will not attempt to coerce or influence staff in the
making of appointments, the awarding of contracts, the
selection of consultants, the processing of development
applications, or the granting of City licenses or permits.
I. Mail that is addressed to the Mayor and City Council will be
circulated by the City Manager to the City Council with a
comment as to which staff person will be assisting the Mayor
and/or Councilmember in preparing a response.
J. The Mayor's response, when appropriate and the original
communication, will be submitted to Council members for their
information. Mail addressed to individual Councilmembers may
be responded to, by that Councilmember.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Five
Section 4. CITY COUNCIL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CITY STAFF (CONT.
K. Staff team sensitivity and support is important. Once a
decision is reached by the Council, Planning Commission or
other City body, it will be accepted, supported and
implemented by staff.
Section 5. LITIGATION AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
A. City Councilmembers will keep all written materials and verbal
information provided to them on matters that are confidential
under State law in complete confidence to insure that the
City's position is not compromised. No mention of information
in these materials will be made to anyone other than
Councilmembers, the City Attorney, City Manager or Assistant
City Manager.
B. If the City Council in closed session has provided direction
to City staff on proposed terms and conditions for any type of
negotiations whether it be related to property acquisition or
disposal, a proposed or pending claims or litigation, and/or
employee negotiations, all contact with the other party will
be the designated City person(s) representing the City in the
handling of the negotiations or litigation. A Councilmember
will not have any contact or discussion with the other party
or its representative involved with the negotiation during
this time and will not communicate any discussion conducted in
closed sessions.
Section 6. INDIVIDUAL COUNCILMEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Frequent communication is an important and integral part of
Council relationships and will be the standard of operation.
B. Respect for each individual Councilmembers interpersonal style
will be a standard of operation. Courtesy and sensitivity to
individual points of view will be a standard of operation.
C. On areas where Councilmembers disagree, especially on the
process to be used, discussions will occur to facilitate a
clear direction.
D. Council approach to authority is collegial rather than
individual.
E. Councilmembers will keep an open mind on all issues.
COUNCIL STANDARDS
Page Six
Section 6. INDIVIDUAL COUNCILMEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES (CONT.)
F. Individual Councilmembers, on matters pertaining to upcoming
or anticipated items where a public hearing will be held, will
maintain as near neutral position as possible to assure not
only the appearance but the actual degree of openness that is
attendant to our community responsibility.
G. No individual grandstanding on any issue will be tolerated by
the Council as a body.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
1991.
MAYOR
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar held on day of , 1991, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. I
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 28, 1991
FROM: Joann M. Saul, Senior Accountant
TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Prescribing a Method of Drawing
Warrants and Checks Upon City Funds
SUMMARY: Pursuant to California law, the City Council may prescribe a method for drawing warrants and
checks.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution 91 -XX authorizing and directing the execution of all documents
reasonably necessary to implement the method for payment of checks and warrants and
providing that all checks and warrants drawn on City funds shall be executed and
countersigned by any two of the following three positions:
a. Mayor
b. City Treasurer
c. Senior Accountant
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report
X Resolution(s)
_ Ordinances(s)
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
_ Public Hearing Notification
_ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_Other
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote?
3. Has environmental impact been assessed?
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission?
Which Commission?
5. Are other departments affected by the report?
Report discussed with the following affected departments:
SVIEWEID Y:
i
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
F:\WP51\AGENDA\COVER.FRM
tlJ�yA
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manager 7
X Yes _ No
_ Yes X No
Yes X No
_ Yes X No
1k) �-oa, C -,
(lbepartment Head)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR PRESCRIBING A METHOD OF DRAWING
WARRANTS AND CHECKS UPON CITY FUNDS
A. Recitals.
(i) Pursuant to California law, the Mayor and City
Clerk are required to execute and countersign all warrants and
checks issued for payment from City funds.
(ii) California Government Section 37203 provides that
the City Council may prescribe an alternative method for drawing
warrants and checks.
(iii) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
desires to provide an alternative method to insure the timely
drawing of warrants and checks upon City funds.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Resolution.
2. Pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code Section 37203, all checks and warrants drawn on
City funds shall be executed and countersigned by any two of the
following three positions:
a. Mayor
b. City Treasurer
C. Senior Accountant
3. Notwithstanding the provisions set forth above,
any and all checks and warrants drawn on City funds payable in
excess of $10,000 shall be signed by the Mayor and one of the
required signatures thereof.
4. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
execution of all documents reasonably necessary to implement the
method for payment of checks and warrants set forth above,
including, but not limited to, execution of documents pertaining
to City bank accounts with City's banking institution(s).
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
, 1991.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond
Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed,
approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of ,
1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
E
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 15, 1991
TO: Mayor, City C�7Jo�uvg�ncil and Councilman -elect Gary Miller
FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
SUBJECT: City Council Appointments
Following the Council re -organization on December 3, 1991, it will
be necessary to reappoint Council Committees. Attached is the list
of current City Council Appointments for your review.
cc: City Manager
Attachments (1)
CITY OF DIAMOND DAR
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO. / /
TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991 REPORT DATE: November 19, 1991
FROM: James DeStefano, Community Development Director
TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23029
SUMMARY: Zelman Development Company is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map to merge two lots located
at 21700 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed
lot merger.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: X Staff Report _ Public Hearing Notification
X Resolution(s) _ Bid Specification (on file in City Clerk's Office)
_ Ordinances(s) _Other
Agreement(s)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION:
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST:
1. Has the resolution, ordinance or agreement been reviewed X Yes _ No
by the City Attorney?
2. Does the report require a majority or 4/5 vote? Majority
3. Has environmental impact been assessed? X Yes _ No
4. Has the report been reviewed by a Commission? X Yes _ No
Which Commission? Planning Commission
5. Are other departments affected by the report? X Yes ` No
Report discussed with the following affected departments: Building Department
Engineering Department
REYJEWED BY- n
,jJf(
Robert L. Van Nort Terrence L. Belanger r ,� James DeStefano
City Manager Assistant City Manager Community Develop ent Director
A:\23039.COV
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AGENDA NO.
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23039
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Zelman Development Company is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map to merge two
lots into one parcel for property located at 21700 E. Copley Drive.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the
proposed lot merger.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
N/A
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
An application for construction of a three story office building on the site
was approved in March 1989, by Los Angeles County Regional Planning. After
the City was incorporated, the processing for this project was continued by
the City. The City discovered that the County allowed the construction of a
structure across the lot line of Lots 21 and 22 of Tract N0. 39679
consequently dividing the existing office building in half and across a
Southern California Edison Easement.
In order to avoid postponement of the construction of the office building, a
Lot Merger Agreement was processed and recorded on June 10, 1991. This Lot
Merger Agreement then allowed the project to proceed with the condition that
the developer process a Parcel Map within one year from the recordation of
the Lot Merger Agreement.
The proposed project is located in the Gateway Corporate Center and is zoned
Commercial Manufacturing -Billboard Exclusion-Unilateral/Contract(CM-BE-U/C).
Generally, the following uses surround the site: to the North is Neighborhood
Business -Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -BE) zone and Open Space (OS) zone which
includes the golf course; to the Northwest is the Pomona Freeway (60 Fwy.);
to the East is CM-BE-U/C which is vacant land.
The applicant, Zelman Development Company is requesting a Tentative Parcel
Map (TPM N0. 23039) to merge two lots (Lot 21 which is 4.16 acres and Lot 22
which is 2.73 acres) of Tract 39679 into one parcel, totaling 6.89 acres.
The use and development of this parcel satisfies the requirements of the
Gateway Center Corporate Design Guidelines and the Subdivision Map Act.
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed Tentative Parcel Map NO.
23039 will not have a significant effect on the environment and is
categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 (C) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
This item was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on November 18, 1991. A notification of
the public hearing was mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius of
the site on November 18, 1991.
The Planning Commission, at a noticed public hearing on September 23, 1991,
recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map N0. 23039 to the City Council.
PREPARED BY:
Ann J. Lungu, Planning Technician
Attachments:
Application
City Council Draft Resolution
Planning Commission Staff Report
Planning Commission Resolution NO.
Planning Commission Minutes
Exhibit "A" - Tentative Parcel Map
91-17
No. 23039, dated September 23, 1991
FINDINGS OF FACT :
1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in substantial compliance with the
proposed General Plan pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
Government Code Section 65360.
2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not adversely affect the health
or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area.
3. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will not have and adverse impact on
adjacent or adjoining residential and commercial uses. It will not be
materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment, or valuation of property
of other persons located in the vicinity of the proposed project.
4. The site for the proposed project is adequately served by Golden Springs
Drive, Bridge Gate Drive and Copley Drive.
5. The subject site for the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is adequate in
size (6.89 acres) and shape to accommodate the proposed use.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Tentative Parcel PT/Lungu addressed the Commission
Map No. 23039 regarding the request made by the
applicant, Zelman Development Company, to
merge two lots into one parcel. Staff
recommended that the Commission approve
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23039, the
Findings of Fact, the Categorical
Exemption, and the attached resolution
and listed conditions.
The Public Hearing was declared opened.
Ben Reiling, of Zelman Development
Company, located at 1661 Hanover Road,
City of Industry, stated that the
building is complete, and 40% is leased.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
Motion was made by C/Schey, seconded by
VC/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to
recommend approval of the Tentative Map
No. 23039 to the City Council.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND DAR APPROVXNG TENTATXVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 23039 TO CONSOLIDATE TWO LOTS (20 & 21 OF
TRACT 39679) INTO ONE PARCEL AT 21700 E.
COPLEY DRIVE, ENVXRONMENTAL DETER41NATXONI
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IPI
SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Rggitdls.
(i) Zelman Development Company has filed an
application for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) for property located
at 21700 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, as described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Tentative Parcel Map application is sometimes
referred to as "the Application" or "TPM".
(ii) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bax' was
established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements
of the California Government Code Section 7376, Title 21 and 22,
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance
No. 1, thereby adopting the Los Angeles' County Code as the
ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the
Los Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of the
County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development
applications, including the subject Application, within the City
of Diamond Bar.
(iii) Because of its recent incorporation, the City
of Diamond Bar lacks on operative General Plan. Accordingly,
I
action was taken on the subject Application, as to consistency to
the General Plan, pursuant to the terms and provisions of
California Government Code Section 65360.
(iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond
Bar, on September 23, 1991, conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on said Application, concluded said public hearing on
that date, and recommended that the City Council approve the
Application and related environmental determination.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by
the City Council of the City of Diamond Dar as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this
Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this
Council during the public hearing, and by written and oral
testimony provided at the hearing, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The Application applies to property presently
zoned C-M-BE-U/C, South side of E. Copley Drive located at 21700
E. Copley Drive, City of Diamond Bar, California.
(b) Generally, the property to the north of the
subject site is zoned C -2 -BE and OS; to the northwest of the
subject site is the Pomona Freeway; east of the subject site is
located C-M^BE-U/C; and southwest of the subject site is the
Orange Rreeway.
(c) Because of the recent incorporation, the City
of Diamond Bar lacks and operative General Plan. Action was
taken on the subject application as to Consistency to the
proposed General Plan pursuant to the terms and provisions of
Government Code, Section 65360.
(d) The Tentative Parcel Map will not have an
adverse impact on adjacent or adjoining residential and
commercial uses. it will not be materially detrimental to the
use, enjoyment, or valuation of property of other persons located
in the vicinity.
(e) The Tentative Parcel Map will not adversely
affect the health or welfare of persons residing or working in
the surrounding area.
(f) The nature, condition, and size of the site
has been considered. The site is adequate to accommodate the
use.
(g) The project will not have an effect on the
'environment and is thereby categorically exempt.
(h) Notification of the public hearing for this
project has been made.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence and conclusions
set forth herein above, and conditions set forth below in this
Resolution, presented to the City Council at the public hearing
3
conducted in regards to this Application, this City Council
hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) This project shall be developed in
substantial conformance with Tentative Parcel Map No. 23029 which
have been submitted for this case, labeled Exhibit "A" dated
September 23, 1991.
(b) Prior to expiration of the Tentative Parcel
Map and prior to filing with the County Recorder, a Final Map
shall be processed through the office of the City Engineer.
(c) Details or notes shown on the Tentative Map
which are inconsistent with the requirements, policies, or
ordinances of the city are not approved.
(d) The Applicant shall label driveways~ as "Fire
Lane' and delineate on the Final Map to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
(s) All existing casements shall be shown on the
Final Map. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, relocate
Utility easements to the satisfaction of the local utility
company.
(f) It is hereby declared that and made a
condition of this Tentative Parcel Map that it any condition
hereof is violated, or if any law, statute, or ordinance is
violated, the Tentative Parcel Map shall be suspended and the
privileges granted shall lapse; provided that applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do
so for a period of thirty (30) days.
4
(g) This grant shall not be effective :for any
purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved
(if other than the permittee) have filed, at the City of Diamond
Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating
that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of
this grant.
(h) Based upon the initial study and conditions
applied to this application, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map
will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment.
(i) The City Council hereby finds that the
environmental review has been prepared with respect to the
application and is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended and guidelines
promulgated thereunder. Further, this Council has reviewed and
considered the information contained therein categorically
exempted.
(j) Thera is a substantial probability that the
approval of this project as proposed in said application will not
be a substantial detriment to, nor interfere with the preparation
of the future adopted General Plan because the site has been
developed in conformance with the Gateway Corporate Center plan.
Further, the City of Diamond Bar is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of the General Plan. Pursuant to
such preparation, it appears that there is a reasonable
probability that the consolidation of the two subject parcels
located within the Gateway Corporate Center will be consistent
0
with the land -uses and policies, goals and objectives set forth
in the General Plan as presently considered in the Draft General
Plan. As a substantial portion of the Gateway Corporate Center
has previously been developed with complementary uses, there is
little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the finally adopted General Plan if this action
is ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan. Further, this
project conforms to all other applicable requirements, state law,
and local ordinances.
4. Based upon the findings and conditions set forth
herein above, this Council, in confonaance with the terms and
provisions of California Government Code section 65360, hereby
approves the application this TPM No. 23039 and the Categorical
Exemption.
and,
S. The City Clerk is hereby directed to:
(a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution
(b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
Zelman Development Company, 1663 Hanover Road, City of Industry,
California 91784.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Zelman
Development Company that the time within which judicial review of
the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is
R
governed by the provisions to the California Code of Civil
Procedures Section 1094.6.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of ,
1991.
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clark of the City of Diamond
Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed,
adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of ,
1991, by the following vote;
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar
C11Q WRESCC0N5W3 1.6A
cr
e-�
C77
.---
cyv
G`
J
RESOLUTION NO. 91-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 23039 TO ALLOW THE MERGER OF
TWO LOTS (20 & 21 OF TRACT 39679) INTO ONE
PARCEL AT 21700 E. COPLEY DRIVE AND
CATEGORICAL EBEMPTION,AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. Zelman Development Company has filed an application for
a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) for property located at
21700 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA, as described in
the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map applica-
tion is referred to as "the Application".
2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was estab-
lished as a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California. On said date, pursuant to the re-
quirements of the California Government Code Section
57376, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 1, thereby adopt-
ing the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of
the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los
Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of
the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to
development applications, including the subject Appli-
cation, within the City of Diamond Bar.
3. Because of its recent incorporation, the City of Dia-
mond Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly,
action was taken on the subject Application, as to
consistency to the General Plan, pursuant to the terms
and provisions of California Government Code Section
65360.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, on
September 23, 1991, conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on said Application, and concluded said public
hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolu-
tion have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above -referenced September 23,
1991, public hearing, and oral testimony provided at
the hearing, this Commission hereby specifically finds
as follows:
a. The Application applies to property presently
zoned C-M-BE-U/C, South side of E. Copley Drive
located at 21700 E. Copley Drive, City of Diamond
Bar, California.
b. Generally, the property to the north of the
subject site is zoned C -2 -BE and OS; to the
northwest of the subject site is the Pomona
Freeway; east of the subject site is zoned C-M-BE-
U/C; and southwest of the subject site is the
Orange Freeway.
C. Because of the recent incorporation, the City of
Diamond Bar lacks and operative General Plan.
Action was taken on the subject application as to
consistency to the proposed General Plan pursuant
to the terms and provisions of Government Code,
Section 65360.
d. The Tentative Parcel Map will not have an adverse
impact on adjacent or adjoining residential and
commercial uses. It will not be materially detri-
mental to the use, enjoyment, or valuation of
property of other persons located in the vicinity.
e. The Tentative Parcel Map will not adversely affect
the health or welfare of persons residing or work-
ing in the surrounding area.
f. The nature, condition, and size of the site has
been considered. The site is adequate to accommo-
date the use.
g. The project will not have an effect on the
environment and is categorically exempt.
h. Notification of the public hearing for this pro-
ject has been made.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence and conclusion set
forth herein above, and conditions set forth below in
this Resolution, presented to the Commission on June
10, 1991, public hearing as set forth above, this Com-
mission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This project shall be developed in substantial
conformance with Tentative Parcel Map No. 23029
which have been submitted for this case, labeled
Exhibit "A" dates September 23, 1991.
b. Prior to expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map
and prior to filing with the County Recorder, a
Final Map shall be processed through the office of
the City Engineer.
C. Details or notes shown on the Tentative Map which
are in consistent with the requirements, policies,
or ordinances of the City are not approved.
d. The Applicant shall label driveways as "Fire Lane"
and delineate on the Final Map to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
e. All existing easements shall be shown on the Final
Map. Prior to recordation of the Final Map,
relocate utility easements to the satisfaction of
the local utility company.
f. It is hereby declared that and made a condition of
this Tentative Parcel Map that if any condition
hereof is violated, or if any law, statue, or
ordinance is violated, the Tentative Parcel Map
shall be suspended and the privileges granted
shall lapse; provided that applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and
has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30)
days.
g. This grant shall not be effective for any purpose
until the permittee and owner of the property in-
volved (if other than the permittee) have filed,
at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development
Department, their affidavit stating that they are
aware of and agree to accept all the conditions -of
this grant.
h. Based upon the initial study and conditions
applied to this application, the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map will not have a significant
adverse effect on the environment.
i. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the
environmental review has been prepared with
respect to the application and is in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as amended and guidelines promulgated
thereunder. Further, this Commission has reviewed
and considered the information contained therein
and determined that the application is
categorically exempted.
j. There is a substantial probability that the
approval of this project as proposed in said
application will not be a substantial detriment
to, nor interfere with the preparation of the
future adopted General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conditions set forth herein
above, this Commission, in conformance with the terms
and provisions of California Government Code Section
65360, hereby approves the application this TPM No.
23039 and the Categorical Exemption.
S. The Planning Commission Secretary is hereby directed
(a.) to certify to the adoption of this Resolution and,
(b.) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Reso-
lution, by certified mail, return receipt request-
ed, to Zelman Development Company, 1661 Hanover
Road, City of Industry, CA 91784.
6. This Commission hereby provides notice to Zelman
Development Company that the time within which judicial
review of the decision represented by this Resolution
must be sought is governed by the provisions to the
California Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of September , 1991.
jJack Grothe, Chairman
I, James DeStefano, Secretary to the City of Diamond Bar Planning
Commission do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was
passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 23rd day of
September 1991, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
COMMISSIONERS: Ch/Grothe, VC/MacBride, Lin,
Schey
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Harmony
COMMISSIONERS:
Secrary to the lanning Commission
CITY OF DIAMOND EAR
DITARTMENr OF PLANNING
21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190
(714)860-3195 Fax (714)860-7427
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Record Owner(s) Applicant
f✓1
Case# rml23C39
Fi 1 ed
Fee$4,19r.406 G -A N lU l
Receipt L11 2-
By 6- , �/, L1_.l
Applicant's Agent
Name fn; mond Bar Hvain ss Assoc
Zelman Development
C P Lange Engineers
d(�
(Last nage first)
M Jr
�P
Address 1661 Hanover Rd.
IBBI Hanover Rd.
tn74n Civic Center Dr #200
City City of Industry. CA
City of Industry. CA
1Rancho Cucamonoa. CA
Zip 91784
91784 f'
_ 91730
Phone( ala) 913-0030
( 618) 913-0030
( 714) 4BB-0199
(Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures
of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.)
CO.VSEYT: I consent to the submission of the application accompanying this
request.
Signed_ 17iQIM B S� Si S Date _��/�(� Z4. IfIt
(All recoraec papers) Qk@ d
CERTIF1C_ATI0jV: I, the undersigned, hereby certify- v under penalty of perjury -that
that
the information hereinprrovided is correct to the best of my knowledge.
Printed Name V►iaLLS lit{
(Apo 'pant or �;^t!
Signed Date Zd
epiicant ar ;_ec;;
'`.^.Cat IM 21700E. Copley Drive
be !'ween Golden Springs Drive and Bridge Gate Drive
i$Itf°I� l$IIeeii
Zonine
Prtvicus Cases
Present Use of Site
Use applied for
Domestic Water Source
h'\\.f 111-337
ed new office buildino site
Company/District walnut Valley W.D.
lfethodof Sewage Disposal Sanitation District L.A. County S.D.
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS ASSOCIATES
1661 HANOVER ROAD • CITY OF INDUSTRY CALIFORNIA 91748 • FAX (818) 9136169 • TELEPHONE (818) 913-0030
July 22, 1991
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Dept's of Planning, Public Works and Building & Safety
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, California 91765-4177
To Whom it May Concern:
This is to inform you that Mr. Klaus Guttau is authorized on behalf
of Diamond Bar Business Associates to sign and process Building
Permits and Tract Map Applications including accompanying documents
as may be required by the City of Diamond Bar for proposed
improvements within the existing Gateway Corporate Center Park.
This authorization is valid until revoked in writing by Diamond Bar
Business Associates.
A sample of Mr. Guttau's signature appears on the lower left side of
this letter.
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS ASSOCIATES
By:
Ben Rei ing, P rest
aus It 4 au
Associate Vice President
Director of Construction
BR/kmf
Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO x Amount
(Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent, map)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project) If
petitioning for zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of
area subject to the change.)
Lots 20 and 21_, Tract 39679 Recorded in Book
Page
Project Site: 6.09 Acres Tentative Map Number Parcel Map 23039
Gross Area
Lots: Existing
Area devoted to :
Residential project
Proposed Density
2 Proposed 1
Structures 27.000 SF [9.0%] Open Space 136.000 sF 146%)
N/A and N/A
Gross Area qo, of floors
N/A
Number and types of Uni t s
Residential Parking:Tvpe
Units/Acre
Required
N/A
Total N/A
Provided
N/A
N/A
Staff Use
Project No.
o3 'i
------------------
------------------
------------------
INITIAL ST -DY Q-ESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL I NFORI - ION
Project Applicant (Comer): Project Representative:
Zelman Development Co C P Lanae Engineers
NA.atE Nlku[E
1561 Hanover Road 10790 Civic Center Drive Suite 200
ADDRESS
City of Industry, CA 91784
[6101 913-0030
PHONE Y
ADDRESS
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730
[7141 466-8199
PHONE
I. Acilon requested and project description: Merger of 2 lots into one parcel
?. Street location of project: Copley Drive
3a
3b
R
Present Use of site: Unoccupied new office building
Previous use Of S1 to OJ" S trL:C iLlreS: Site has not previously been used
Please list all previous cases
(if any) related to this project:
(lrl�.�l• rPl a tcr� p�rmi r /an.•r,.�` �1� lll. y'C�..
Specify type and granting agency. None required
Are you plannfng future phases of this project? Y N
�. J
If yes, explain:_____
7. Project Area:
Covered by structures, paving: 136.300 SF 45.5%
Landscaping: 25.100 SF 8.4%
Open space: 130.000 SF 46.1%
Total Area: 299.400 SF
(6.09 AW
8. Number of floors: 3
9. Present zonine: cmBF-uc
10. Water and sewer service:
Domestic Public
Water Sewers
Does service exist at site? G N N
If yes, do purveyors have
capacity to meet demand of
project and all other approved
projects? � N N
If domestic water or public sewers are not available, holo will these services
beprovided?
Residential Projects:
11. Number and type of units:
12. Schools:
What school district(s) serves the property?
Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs?
YES NO
If not, what provisions will be made for
classrooms?
additional
Non -Residential projects:
13. Distance to nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital,
etc. ) 500 feet to residential area
14. Number and floor area of buildings: I building - 27.000 SF footprint
15. Number of employees and shifts: Unknown
16. Maximum employees per shift: Unknown
17. Operating hours: Unknown
18. Identify any: End products Unknown
Waste products Typical office wastes
Means of disposal Conventional waste disposal service
19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous substances such as
oil, pes icides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials?
YESI`'O
If yes, explain
20. Do your operations require any pressurized tanks?
YES O.NO
If yes, explain
21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-
s i t e . Unknown
"_. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach
the nearest highway?
I -ES \'O
If yes, explain
B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
1. Environmental Setting --Project Site
a. Existing use/structures tinoccuoind new office building site
b. Topography/slopes Graded slopes and pad exist per Tract 39679 development
*c. Vegetation
*d. Animals
*e. Watercourses
f. Cultural/historical resources None present
g. Other
'. Environmental Setting -- Surrounding Area
a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): some oFfice buildings exist
in the area
b. Topography/slopes Graded slopes and pads. Adjacent south easterly property
is natural slopes
*c. Vegetation
*d. Animals
*e. Watercourses
f. Oaltural/historical resources None present
g. Other
* Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural,
undeveloped land.
3
Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees?
ITS � NO �
If yes, type and number:
4. Will any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns, etc., be changed
through project development":
ITS 00)
If yes, explain:
5. Grading:
Will the project require gradine? YES
If yes, how many cubic yards?
Will it be balanced on site? YES NO
If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited?
6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on
the property (including uncompacted fill)?
YES 0
If ves, explain:
7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with
moderately dense vegetation)'
YES GNIO
Distance to nearest fire station: 1.3 miles
8. Noise:
Existing noise sources at site:
Noise to be generated by project:
Fumes:
Odors generated by project: None
Could toxic fumes be generated? No
ne
Automobile traffic
10. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used?
[building has already been constructed]
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that
the facts, statements, and information presented are true and
correct to the bes of my knowledge and belief.
JIAIu 7-41 11911
Date SAgnature
For: Di4YNORA ad+'I►tsi NBSs _4,ucyaies
OAK TRIS STATEMENT
[ ] The subject property contains no oak trees.
[ ] The subject property contains one or more oak trees, however the
applicant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction)
will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any
oak tree.
[ ] The subject property contains one or more oak trees and the applicant
states that activity (grading and/or construction) will take place
within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of anv oak tree. an Oak
Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity
taking place on the property.
appli ni's Sizn3iure) (D te)
0
EASEMENTS OF RECORD
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
I, James T. Prendergast, declare under penalty of perjury that
all easements of record are shown on the tentative Parcel Map No.
23039 and that if the easements are blanket or indeterminate in
nature that a statement to that effect has been placed on the
tentative map. The purpose and ownership of all easements are also
stated.
Lt f"
Executed at Rancho Cucamonga, California, this -3/____ day
Of July, 1991.
91692\affidavit
17
aures T. Prendeast, P.E.
CP Lange Engin ers
T DIAMOND BAR
21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177
714-860-2489 • FAX 714-861-3117
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the
City Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one
parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C
Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently developed
with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically
Exempt Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning
of surrounding property. If you are unable
to attend the public hearing, but wish to send
written comments, please write to the City Clerk
at the address given below. You may also obtain
additional information concerning this case by
phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular
office hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA.
/s/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-18-91
JOHN A. FORBING JAY C. KIM PHYLLIS E. PAPEN DONALD C. NARDELLA GARY H. WERNER ROBERT L. VAN NORT
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councibnember Councilmember City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER
r=� �L
DIAMOND flit I
21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100
DIAMOND BAR. CA 91765-4177
714-860-2489 • FAX 714-861-3117
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE I8 HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the
City Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one
d.V 9
parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C
Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently developed
with a new office building. oP In o1 T
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically jIV 4N'
Exempt Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning
of surrounding property. If you are unable
to attend the public hearing, but wish to send <
written comments, please write to the City Clerk
at the address given below. You may also obtain
additional information concerning this case by
phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
CN
Q N p
` a4 Oa Z
� N
If you challenge this application and project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E..Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular
office hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA.
/s/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-18-91
JOHN A. FORBING JAY C. KIM PHYLLIS E. PAPEN DONALD C. NARDELLA GARY H. WERNER ROBERT L. VAN NORT
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Coundirnember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER
— =`(w -, 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100
01--A OND BAR I DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177
� ? 714-860-2489 • FAX 714-861-3117
_
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the
City Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one
parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C
Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently developed
with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically
Exempt Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning
of surrounding property. If you are unable
to attend the public hearing, but wish to send
written comments, please write to the City Clerk
at the address given below. You may also obtain
additional information concerning this case by
phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular
office hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA.
Lyhda Burgess, C4ty Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-18-91
JOHN A. FORBING JAY C. KIM PHYLLIS E. PAPEN DONALD C. NARDELLA GARY H. WERNER
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER
ROBERT L. VAN NORT
City Manager
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the City
Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one
parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C
Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently developed
with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically
Exempt Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning
of surrounding property. If you are unable
to attend the public hearing, but wish to send
written comments, please write to the City Clerk
at the address given below. You may also obtain
additional information concerning this case by
phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular office
hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100,
Diamond Bar, CA.
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-13-91
PUBLISH DATE: 11-18-91
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the
City Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one
parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C
Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently developed
with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically
Exempt Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning
of surrounding property. If you are unable to
attend the public hearing, but wish to send
written comments, please write to the City Clerk
at the address given below. You may also obtain
additional information concerning this case
by phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular
office hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA.
/sl Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-13-91
� C �•,%N ,� 2 S
8293 -050 -002 --
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
1-,F-7;4 77) YJv( G 2 a
U
8293-050-00.
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
Q' 8293-050-018 8293-050-01r
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC
393 E. WALNUT 393 E. WALNUT
PASADENA, CA 91188 PASADENA, CA 91188
Q Q
8293-050-019 8293-050-00
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900 515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
a O 8293-050-022 0 8293-050-02,
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900 515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
SS 8293-050-900 I� 8293-050-90C
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENTi SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMEA
91 -5 -0 --FLAIR DR. 9150 FLAIR DR.
EL MONTE, CA 91731 EL MONTE, CA 91731
8293-001-024
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER ASSN
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
,o 8293-001-024
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER ASSN
DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS
515 S. FIGUEROA ST. SUITE 1900
LOS ANGELES. CA 90071
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR that the
City Council will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one parcel at 21700 E.
Copley Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is
currently developed with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Categorically Exempt
Sect. 15305 Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning of surrounding
property. If you are unable to attend the public hearing, but
wish to send written comments, please write to the City Clerk at
the address given below. You may also obtain additional
information concerning this case by phoning the Planning
Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: Tuesday, December 3, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATING OF HEARING: AQMD Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular
office hours at the City Clerk's Office, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA.
Is/ Lynda Burgess
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
DATED: 11-13-91
PUBLISH DATE: 11-18-91
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
THE DEPARTMENT OF
CITY PLANNING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR /;- Fhe City
'on will conduct a public hearing on:
A request to merge two lots into one parcel at 21700 E. Copley
Drive, in a C-M-BE-U/C Zone. The 6.89 Acre Site is currently
developed with a new office building.
Applicant: Zelman Development
Environmental Determination: Catagorically Exempt Sect. 15305
Class 5 (c)
This case does not affect the zoning of surrounding property. If
you are unable to attend the public hearing, but w h to send
written comments, please write to the City —nt at
the address given below4 You may also
obtain additional information concerning this case by phoning the
Planning Department at (714) 396-5676.
If you challenge this application and project in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the �-aging Gym_ p zsien at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
DATE OF HEARING: M 13 aV--, t r t ----2-3 , 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m.
LOCATION OF HEARING: W? a l l c�� TTn i f i Pcj School District
-_�_...®.-�...
Bo oom 880 S. Lemon Ave.,
Diamond Bar, California
CASE MATERIALS: Are available for review during regular office
hours at the G-it-y--lanni:-ftg Department, 21660 Copley Drive, Suite
Tg"O, Diamond Bar, CA
l00
File No. TPM 23039
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on: _
A request to merge two lots into
one parcel at 21700 E. Copley Drive
in a C-M-BE-U/C Zone. The 6.89 acre
site is currently developed with a
new office building.
APPLICANT: Zelman Development
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
Catagorically exempt.
Sect. 15305 Class 5 (C)
VICINITY MAP OF PROJECT:
This case does not affect the zoning of surrounding property. If
you are unable to attend the public hearing, but wish to send
written comments, please write to the City Planning Department at
the address given below, Attention: Ann Lunqu You
may also obtain additional information concerning this case by
phoning the Planning Department at (714) 396-9986. Materials for
this case are also available at:
Diamond Bar County Library
1061 South Grand Avenue
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
DATE OF HEARING: September 23, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P.M.
LOCATION OF HEARING: Walnut Valley Unified School District
880 South Lemon Street _
Walnut CA 91789
CASE MATERIALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY:
Are available for review during regular
business hours at:
City of Diamond Bar Planning Department
21660 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
If you challenge this application and project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Published in:
San Gabriel Tribune on August 29, 1991
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on August 29, 1991