HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/04/1991THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR
AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU
ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL
MEETING TAPES WILL BE BLACKED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING
AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION.
CLOSED SESSION 5:00 P.M.
Litigation - Section 54956.9
Personnel - Section 54957.6
Next Resolution No. 91-27
Next Ordinance No. 3 (1991)
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Forbing
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN WERNER, NARDELLA, PAPEN,
MAYOR PRO TEM KIM, MAYOR FORBING
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers
are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this
meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future
meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each
regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the
public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or
matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled
for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card
and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is
voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when
addressing the City Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent
Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single
motion.
1. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS -
A.
Planning Commission - June 10, 1991 -
7:00 p.m.,
W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
B.
Economic Development Workshop - June 12, 1991
5:30 p.m.,
Diamond Bar Hotel, 259 Gentle Springs Ln.
C.
Parks and Recreation Commission - June 13,
1991 7:00
p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite
100
D.
Traffic and Transportation Commission - June 13,
1991 - 6:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 Grand
Ave.
E.
City Council Meeting - June 18, 1991 - (4:30
p.m. Study
Session re: a) Source Reduction & Recycling
Element; b)
fees re management of waste haulers; c)
recycling
programs provided by waste haulers) 6:00 p.m.,
W.V.U.S.D.
Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
F. Economic Development Workshop - June 22, 1991 9:00 a.m.,
Diamond Bar Hotel, 259 Gentle Springs
G. First Concert in the Park - July 3, 1991 - 6:30 p.m. ,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 JUNE 4, 1991
Sycamore Canyon Park
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 7, 1991, as
amended.
3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated June 4,
1991 in the amount of $484,875.35.
4. TREASURER'S REPORT - Approve Treasurer's Report for the
Month of April, 1991.
5. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Receive and
file Traffic & Transportation Commission Minutes of April
11, 1991.
6. PARRS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Receive and file
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of March 14, 1991
and March 28, 1991.
7. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - Claim for Damages filed by Shirley
White.
Recommended Action: Deny.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY -
Pursuant to Government Code Section 53646, cities must
annually adopt an investment policy which states the
goal' of investment activities, types of investments the
City will, invest idle funds in and specifies monthly
reporting requirements.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX adopting
the Statement of Investment Policy.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TIME
REQUEST FOR C.U.P. 86-410 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
1200 SOUTH BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA - as
directed during meeting of May 21, 1991.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX denying
the appeal of the Planning Commission denial of the
extension of time request for C.U.P. 86-410 for property
located at 1200 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING, SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS, THE MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1634-1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING THE TIME FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3255 DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD OWNED BY THE EVANGELICAL FREE
CHURCH OF DIAMOND BAR - As directed during meeting of May
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 JUNE 4, 1991
21, 1991.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX approving,
subject to conditions, modification of C.U.P. 1634-1 for
extension of time for development of project at 3255
Diamond Bar Blvd. owned by Evangelical Free Church of
Diamond Bar.
11. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.38 AND ANY ASSESSMENTS
THEREON FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX approving
the report with respect to City Landscaping and Liqhting
Assessment District No.38.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 91- X: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE REPORT FILED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE WITH RESPECT TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 AND FIXING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT ON SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR
1991-92
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX approving
the report with respect to City Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 39.
13. RESOLUTION No. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE REPORT FILED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE WITH RESPECT TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 AND FIXING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT ON SAID DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR
1991-92
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX approving
the report with respect to City Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 41.
14. RESOLUTION NO. 91 XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING
LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO EMPOWER PROPERLY TRAINED PEACE
OFFICERS TO REMOVE UNSAFE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES FROM
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX
supporting legislative efforts to empower, properly
trained peace officers to remove unsafe commercial
vehicles from streets and highways.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 JUNE 4, 1991
15. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF
OF SAID DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1890 IN THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR
AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND
CONVEYANCE THEREOF - Private Drain No. 1890 was
constructed in 1988 as part of the improvements in Tract
No. 42533. Subsequently, the drain was inspected and
approved by the L.A. County Public Works based upon
satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans. City Engineer has reviewed and is in agreement.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX requesting
L.A. County Department of Public Works Flood Control
District to accept transfer and conveyance of Private
Drain No. 1890 for future operation, maintenance, repair
and improvement.
16. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF
OF SAID DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2145 IN THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR
AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND
CONVEYANCE THEREOF - Private Drain No. 2145 was
constructed in 1990 as part of the improvements in Tract
No. 42564. Subsequently, the drain was inspected and
approved by L.A. County Public Works based upon the
satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans. The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements
and is in agreement.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX requesting
L.A. County Department of Public Works Flood Control
District to accept transfer and conveyance of Private
Drain No. 2145 for future operation, maintenance, repair
and improvement.
17. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF
OF SAID DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORK DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1862 IN THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR
AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER AND
CONVEYANCE THEREOF - Private Drain No. 1862 was
constructed in 1990 as part of the improvements in Tract
No. 31850. Subsequently, the drain was inspected and
approved by L.A. County Public Works based upon the
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 5 JUNE 4, 1991
satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans. The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements
and is in agreement.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX requesting
L.A. County Department of Public Works Flood Control
District to accept the transfer and conveyance of Private
Drain No. 1862 for future operation, maintenance, repair
and improvement.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF
OF SAID DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1668 UNIT II IN
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF - Private Drain No. 1668
Unit II was constructed in 1990 as part of the improve-
ments in Tract No. 41305. Subsequently, the drain
was inspected and approved by L.A. County Public Works
based upon the satisfactory completion of the improve-
ments per approved plans. The City Engineer has reviewed
the improvements and is in agreement.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX requesting
L.A. County Department of Public Works Flood Control
District to accept transfer and conveyance of Private
Drain No. 1668 Unit II for future operation, maintenance,
repair and improvement.
19. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A FINANCIAL
ADVISOR AND BOND COUNSEL AND APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL
ADVISORY SERVICES AND AN AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES,
ALL IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED 1991 TAX AND REVENUE
ANTICIPATION NOTES - In order to issue short term tax and
revenue anticipation notes pursuant to Section 43580 et
seq. of the Government Code and appoint a financial
advisor and bond counsel I the City has enlisted the
services of Jones Hall Hill & White as Bond Counsel and
Sutro & Co. as Financial Advisor.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX author-
izing and directing execution of agreement for financial
advisory services and agreement f or legal services in
connection with the proposed 1991 tax and revenue
anticipation notes.
OLD BUSINESS
20. 1991 OLYMPIC TORCH RUN - The U.S. Postal service, in
conjunction with the U.S. Olympic Committee, is
sponsoring a torch run to commence the Olympic Festival
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PAGE 6 JUNE 4, 1991
activities scheduled for July 1991 in Los Angeles. The
torch run will pass through Diamond Bar July 8th and 9th
via Diamond Bar Blvd. from south to north. The run will
reach Diamond Bar Blvd. at approximately 4:15 p.m. on the
8th and will stop at Diamond Bar Blvd. and Grand and will
re -commence on the following morning. An oral
presentation will be made by Kathleen Wilson, Torch Run
Coordinator for Diamond Bar, as well as by Parks &
Recreation staff.
Recommended Action: Support the Torch Run and direct
staff as necessary.
21. CONCERT IN THE PARR - The City will be conducting its
first Concert in the Park series commencing July 3, 1991
at Sycamore Canyon Park. Two community groups, the
Jaycees and the Rotary, have expressed a desire to
partially fund the concerts as well as provide concession
services earmarked for fund raising to promote community-
based activities. An oral presentation will be made by
staff and it is requested that the Council provide policy
as to their desires in implementing the Concert in the
Park series.
Recommended Action: Adopt a policy and direct staff
as necessary.
22. AWARD OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACT FOR PARRS
- Continued from May 21, 1991. Council reference
verification and a report.
Recommended Action: Award contract to the lowest
responsive bidder, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, in
an amount not to exceed $97,932 for landscape maintenance
community parks for Fiscal Year 1991-92.
NEW BUSINESS
23. COMMUNITY INFORMATION SIGNAGE - The Parks & Recreation
Commission has been exploring various methods of
advertising community events and providing a means
whereby service organizations can advertise their special
events.
Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary.
24. MEMORIAL PLAQUE - As requested by the Diamond Bar
Jaycees, the Parks & Recreation Commission studied the
concept of providing for the placement of a plaque
donated to the City by the Jaycees. Said plaque would
carry the names of persons who have contributed to
making the City a better place to live.
Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 7 JUNE 4, 1991
25. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT - Amicus Brief regarding sale of
surplus school property.
Recommended Action: Participate in the City of
Moorpark's Amicus Brief.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matters
can be heard.
26. ORDINANCE NO. XX (1991): AN ORDINANCE OF THE
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.
91-2 CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22000 GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA" AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR - The applicant, Gary Clapp of Toran
Development and construction, is requesting a
Development Agreement to permit a variety of land uses
on the site which include a car wash.
Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive
testimony and, as recommended by the Planning
Commission, approve the Negative Declaration and the
Development Agreement with conditions.
ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember
to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at the next
regular meeting
ADJOURNMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: MAY 29, 1991
TO: PARKS AND RECREATION
FROM: COUNCILMAN DON NARDELLA
SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
In our efforts to provide the best possible recreation programs to the citizens of Diamond
Bar, I believe that it is important to have a long-range plan that will assist the City Council
in its decision making responsibilities. I would find it most helpful and useful to have a
Parks and Recreation Master Plan that would, at least, address the following:
1. INVENTORY OF CTI7Y RESOURCES.
A. City owned and operated facilities
B. Other public facilities located within the corporate boundary
2. INVENTORY OF PUBLIC FACILrMA WITHIIv THE REGION WMC14
PROVIDE SERVICE To THE RESIDENT'S OF DIAMOND BAR.
3. INVENTORY OF SIGNIFICANT PRIVATELY OWNED FACILITIES
WITHIN THE REGION WHICH PROVIDE SERVICE TO TIS
RESIDENTS OF DIAMOND BAR.
4. A PARKS AND RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF THE
RESIDENTS OF DIAMOND BAR.
A. Develop a data base that can be up -dated over time.
B. Develop a list of critez is that can be used to aid in establishing priorities.
5. IDENTIFY CRITERIA USED TO ESTABLISH RECREATION
PROGRAMS.
6. IDENTIFY CURRENT USER GROU'T'S OF CITY OWNED AND
OPERATED FACILITIES.
7. IDENTIFY UNMET COMMUNITY RECREATION NEEDS.
8. PROVIDE FISCAL IMPACT INFORMATION RELATIVE TO
ADDRESSING THE COMMUNTTY'S RECREATIONAL NEEDS.
9. PROVIDE AL:fERNATIVES TO MEETING IDENTIFIED
RECREATIONAL NEEDS.
It is my intent to identify the recreational needs of the citizens of Diamond Bar and to
assess the ability of the existing facilities to meet the needs of the community. I wish to
encourage our recreational planners to seek inventive solutions to the goal of providing
"Quality Recreational Opportunities" which will be accessible to all of our residents.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan should not duplicate the goals and objectives that
are being developed in our General Plan. This document should to directed toward
implementation of a strategy which will meet our needs.
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MAY 7, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: M/Forbing called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon
Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE: by C/Papers.
ROLL CALL: Councilmen Werner, Nardella, Papen, Mayor Pro Tem
Kim and Mayor Forbing.
Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort,
Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City
Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Director of Planning
James DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Mousavi, Parks
and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel and City
Clerk Lynda Burgess.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill, complained
about Western Waste's "tactics" in providing their
subscribers with recycling bins without permission
and then requiring the subscriber to notify them if
the bids were not wanted.
CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Werner moved, seconded by MPT/Kim to approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of the April
16, 1991 Minutes. Motion carried by the following
Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Nardella, Papen,
MPT/Kim, M/Forbing
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
Schedule Future A. Traffic & Transportation Commission - May 9,
Meetings 1991 - 6:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 S.
Grand Ave.
B. Parks & Recreation Commission - May 9, 1991 -
7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
#100
C. Planning Commission - May 13, 1991 - 6:30
p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
D. California Contract Cities Assn. Annual
Seminar - May 16, 1991, Palm Springs City
Council Meeting - May 21, 1991, 6:00 p.m.,
W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
Minutes Approved Budget Study Minutes of April 9,
1991.
Warrant Register Approved Warrant Register dated May 7, 1991 in the
amount of $517,609.78.
Treasurer's Approved Treasurer's Report for the month of March,
Report 1991.
MAY 7, 1991
PAGE 2
Planning Comm.
Received
and filed Planning
Commission Minutes of
Minutes
February
25, 1991; March 11,
1991; March 25, 1991
and April
8, 1991.
Traffic & Trans.
Received
and filed Traffic &
Transportation Comm.
Comm. Minutes
Minutes of
February 14, 1991
and March 14, 1991.
Claims for
Denied Claim
for Damages filed by (A) John and
Damages
Margaret
Cragin, (B) Glen
Ortega and (C) Roger
Gomez.
Resolution 91-22 Adopted Resolution No. 91-22 entitled: A RESOLUTION
Approving OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Destruction of APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND
City Records & DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED
Documents No UNDER CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 14811.
Longer Required
1994 World Authorized letter of support for selection of Los
Cup Soccer Angeles/Pasadena to host the 1995 World Cup Soccer
Tournament and authorize the Mayor to execute said
letter on behalf of the Council.
Southern Calif.
Joint Powers
Insurance Author.
Membership
Solid Waste
Recycling Pgms.
Proclamation -
May, 1991
"Older Americans
Month"
Proclamation -
May, 1991
"Goodwill Indust.
Month"
Proclamation -
May 10-16, 1991
"Respect for
Law Week"
Affirmed appointment of M/Forbing as delegate and
C/Papen as alternate to the Southern California
Joint Powers Insurance Authority.
Received and filed report prepared by Administrative
Analyst Troy Butzlaff regarding proposed recycling
programs.
Proclaimed the month of May, 1991 as "Older
Americans Month."
Proclaimed the month of May, 1991, as "Goodwill
Industries Month."
Proclaimed the week of May 10 - 16, 1991 as "Respect
for Law Week."
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
Proclamation - Proclaimed May 11, 1991 as "Fire Service Day" and
May 11, 1991 presented Asst. Fire Chief Robert Lee with the
"Fire Service Day" Proclamation.
MAY 7, 1991
PAGE 3
Asst. Fire Chief Lee accepted the Proclamation and
announced that on May 11, 1991 all Fire Stations
will be open to the public, and that Station 119 on
Pathfinder Rd. will conduct special activities for
the public.
Recognition of
M/Forbing introduced Specialist Leonard Holifield,
Spc. Leonard
presented him with a City pin, and congratulated
Holifield for
him on his efforts in capturing an Iraqi soldier
Exceptional
while serving in Saudi Arabia. Special certificates
Service During
of recognition were presented to him by Mr.
Gulf War.
Garrettson Stitt, representing Assemblyman Paul
Horcher and Senator Frank Hill. A representative
from Congressman David Dreier's office also
presented a certificate to Mr. Holifield.
Proclamation -
M/Forbing proclaimed May 8, 1991 as "Day of the
May 8, 1991
Teacher" and presented Mr. Richard Valencia from
"Day of the
the Walnut Valley Unified School District and Ms.
Teacher"
Toby Kahan of the Pomona Unified School District
with Proclamations.
Proclamation - M/Forbing proclaimed the week of May 20 - 24, 1991
May 20-24, 1991 as "Classified School Employees Week" and presented
"Classified Ms. Val Burkel of the Walnut Unified School District
School Employee" and Ms. Phyllis Flores of the Pomona Unified School
District with Proclamations.
OLD BUSINESS:
Business License ACM/Belanger reported that Administration of Title
Services by 7 of the L.A. County Code, which the City adopted
L.A. County upon Incorporation, had been handled by the County
Tax Assessor's Office until the City suspended
enforcement in March, 1991. The Ordinance regu-
lates approximately 120 categories of businesses
throughout the City. In March, the Council
determined that a closer look at the administration
of Title 7 should be done and a determination made
as to whether the City was interested in taking it
over. He further reported that it would require
the City to hire one full-time inspector and one
full-time clerical -technical person to properly
administer Title 7 and that based on current
renewal fee schedules, approximately $25,000 per
year would be generated in fees. He estimated that
approximately $100,000 would be required to under-
write the cost of administering this program.
Based on the research, he recommended that the
Council rescind suspension of administration of
Businesses Licenses by the County and direct staff
to reinstate administration by the County effective
May 8, 1991; and to further direct staff to under-
take a comprehensive analysis of Title 7 to
determine which categories should be retained.
MAY 7, 1991
PAGE 4
A representative of Big Brothers' of Greater Los
Angeles spoke regarding the operation of Bingo,
stating that Title 7 specifies that Bingo can only
be open 1 day a week and that the his organization
needs to be open 3 days a week.
Ms. Mary Robinson stated that she had applied for a
business license from the City and that if the
Council decided to authorize the County to
administer licensing, that the City be allowed to
process applications currently on file.
Mr. Charles Janet, with Southland Commercial Real
Estate Services, asked if a CUP would be required
if someone wanted to run a Bingo game more than one
day a week.
CA/Arczynski stated that the only way to run such
an activity more than one day a week would be for
the Council to change the Ordinance.
Bill Thackery, owner of Little Professor Book
Center, spoke regarding the fees imposed on his
business in the amount of $1,400 and asked if there
was anything that could be done regarding this
amount.
Mr. Fred Scalza, with the Chamber of Commerce,
stated that the Chamber is very interested in the
issue of licensing and has decided to give the
Council an opportunity to go over all the
information presented and come up with a plan.
C/Werner stated that he was in support of rein-
statement of Title 7 by the County and that staff
should be directed to determine how to analyze
Title 7 enforcement and bring the matter back to
Council for review.
C/Nardella stated that he was in favor of a compre-
hensive analysis being done, but had difficulties
supporting'the continued processing of Title 7 by
the County.
C/Papers suggested that an audit be conducted to
make sure that all businesses doing business under
Title 7 have obtained licenses.
MPT/Kim was in agreement with a study being
conducted.
M/Forbing stated that he agreed with C/Werner's
remarks and, with Council concurrence, directed
staff to start the process and come back to Council
in 60 days with a comprehensive report, including
MAY 7, 1991
PAGE 5
bringing Title 7 "in house," and to notify the
County that suspension of administration of Title 7
is being rescinded.
Commission C/Nardella nominated Garrettson Stitt to the Parks
Appointments & Recreation Commission, Grace Lin to the Planning
Commission and Art Fritz to the Traffic &
Transportation Commission. With consensus of
Council, these appointments were affirmed. C/
Nardella administered Oaths of Office to Mr. Stitt,
Mrs. Lin and Mr. Fritz.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Ordinance XX
PD/DeStefano stated that the Planning Commission had
(1991) Draft
been requested to prepare a comprehensive sign study
Sign Ordinance
at the beginning of 1990. A survey of approxim-
ately 12 Southern California cities was undertaken
to review aspects of those cities' codes. Staff
presented a preliminary draft of an Ordinance in
late June or July, 1990 which favored Mission
Viejo's Code specifically, but also took aspects of
the other cities that were surveyed. The Planning
Commission then reviewed the document and
recommended a variety of changes. Part of the
changes incorporated input from members of the
community including the Chamber of Commerce as well
as business operators, property owners and
developers. An analysis of a September, 1989
Chamber survey and the proposed City Code was
undertaken in October, 1990. The current draft
breaks down signs into four groups which are: 1)
those within a "basic" category meaning that City
staff could review them within their offices; 2)
those contained within a "planned" category,
meaning those requiring Planning Commission review
and approval; 3) those exempt from the provisions
and those strictly prohibited. The Planning
Commission reviewed the various documents and
solicited input from about 70 different individuals
and organizations. The draft Ordinance was based
on the input the Commission received. He further
stated that the draft was brought before the
Council to understand the bulk of material
presented in the packet, open the Public Hearing,
take testimony and direct staff accordingly.
M/Forbing opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bob Velker, owner of Fast Frame, asked about
the height of lettering at his business as well as
whether a business person could appeal the denial
of a sign to the City Council.
MAY 7, 1991
PAGE 6
C/Werner stated that the question of height of
lettering should be taken up with the developer.
PD/DeStefano stated that denials could be appealed
to the City Council.
Mr. Velker stated that he was then speaking as a
representative of the Chamber of Commerce and that
they are prepared to rally as many people and get
as much opinion as they can to get the business
community involved when the final draft is
prepared.
Mr. Cary Treff, representing the Wolff Co. (Country
Hills Towne Center), 7700 Irvine Center Dr., 1710,
Irvine, stated that many of the signs currently in
the center would be violating the draft Ordinance
and suggested that Council consider bumping the
allowable signage up to 1 1/2 ft. of square footage
per linear foot on stores, with a minimum allowed
of 30 sq. ft. for shops. He also suggested
allowing additional signage on the back of
buildings that butt up to the street.
Ms. Margaret Watkins, with the Wolff Co. asked that
the Council look realistically at the Ordinance.
Mr. Jack Williamson, Classics Restaurant, 2529
Gentle Springs Ln., stated that he has been working
with the Planning Commission for a long time,
trying to work out the problem. He believed that
there would be acceptance of special freeway -
oriented signs and felt that it would help his
business. He further stated that the Ramada Inn is
undergoing major renovations and that the name of
the hotel would soon be changed to Hotel Diamond
Bar.
Mr. Brad Gramlin, representing Young Electric Sign
Co., 1413 E. Philadelphia, Ontario, stated that
there are several businesses in D.B. waiting to see
what happens with the Ordinance in order to put up
signs. He was concerned that the Ordinance
provided for well-planned signs and suggested that
it provide a broader latitude for the Planning
Director and/or sign review committee to look at
individual requests.
Mr. Marc Henry, asked Council to remember the
slogan "Shop Diamond Bar" and to distinguish that
adequate shopping current exists in D.B.
Mrs. Eileen Davis, President of D.B. Chamber of
Commerce, stated that the Council needs to look at
future revenue for the City by supporting the
MAY 7, 1991 PAGE 7
business community through this Ordinance.
With no further testimony offered, M/Forbing closed
the Public Hearing.
C/Werner stated that he was not prepared to take
action on this matter and needed more time to
digest all the materials given; however, he was
concerned that Council may need to look at the
community instead of looking at what other
communities have done. He asked Mr. DeStefano about
the effect the proposed Ordinance would have on
existing signs.
PD/DeStefano stated that a study had been conducted
in August and that he believed that less than 1% of
the signs within each center would be in non-
conformance of the draft Ordinance.
C/Werner further stated that he would be in favor
of the suggestion brought up regarding modification
of square footage from 1 sq. ft to 1 1/2 sq. ft,
thereby increasing the maximum sign footage from 25
to 30 ft.
C/Nardella stated that he did not have enough
information to make a determination and had many
questions to discuss with staff at a later time.
He indicated concern that there are other centers
that do not have sign programs, who do not have
consistency of development or signage, that do not
regulate their tenants and that do not assist
businesses in promoting themselves. He requested
more input from the business community indicating
how the Ordinance would impact them. He felt that
an Ordinance is appropriate and that it should not
only restrict certain types of signage but also
promote businesses within the community by
identifying them for the citizenry.
C/Papen recommended that an illustration be placed
in the Ordinance so that when people review the
sign code, there will be an indication of how staff
would measure the sign. She suggested that
addresses be placed on all free-standing signs so
that businesses will be easier to locate.
MPT/Kim stated that he was in favor of regulating
signs and felt that the draft Ordinance was a good
start.
M/Forbing suggested that the Chamber work with the
shopping center owners and managers. He stated
that he had been working with staff to put together
a specific sign plan for each center so that
MAY 7, 1991 PAGE 8
centers would be able to conform to the Ordinance.
Mr. Jim Paul, 1269 Ahtena Dr., stated that although
he felt that there should be a sign Ordinance, some
ideas expressed by the Council are too conserva-
tive.
Following further discussion, M/Forbing moved and
C/Werner seconded to continue the Public Hearing to
June 18, 1991. With consensus of Council, the
motion carried.
RECESS: M/Forbing recessed the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
RECONVENE: M/Forbing reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution 91-23 Following discussion, C/Papen moved, C/Werner
Establishing seconded to adopt Resolution No. 91-23 entitled:
Worker's Comp. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Benefits for DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
Reg. Disaster CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING WORKER'S COMPENSATION
Services Wkrs. BENEFITS FOR REGISTERED DISASTER SERVICES WORKERS.
With the consensus of Council, motion carried.
Ordinance 2
CA/Arczynski presented for first reading by title
(1991) Repealing
only, Ordinance No. 2 (1991) entitled: AN ORDINANCE
Chp. 2.68 of L.A.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
County Code &
REPEALING CHAPTER 2.68 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Establishing New
CODES AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED AND ESTABLISHING NEW
Provisions re
PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.
Emergency
Preparedness
C/Papen moved, C/Werner seconded to approve
Ordinance No. 2 (1991) for first reading by title
only. With the following Roll Call vote, motion
carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Nardella, Papen, Werner,
MPT/Kim, M/Forbing
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
Purchase of CM/Van Nort stated that Council had heard about the
Photocopier proposed purchase of a copy machine during a budget
study session. At that time, it was suggested that
the purchase be made from the 1990-91 budget.
Staff proposed the purchase of a high volume, high
speed xerographic reproduction Xerox 1090 duplica-
tor through International Business Equipment at a
cost not to exceed $26,536 with a stipulation that
first year maintenance be provided through the
Xerox Corporation for Full Service maintenance.
He further explained that the funds would be
provided from "non -appropriated funds."
MAY 7, 1991 PAGE 9
MPT/Kim stated that he felt that the machine should
be leased and not purchased due to depreciation and
the ability to trade-in outdated copiers for newer
models every few years.
C/Nardella stated that he had asked staff to look
into working with outside agencies and contracting
for someone to purchase the machine, place it at
City Hall and possibly provide someone to run
copies.
M/Forbing requested that the matter be continued to
June 4, 1991 to provide staff an opportunity to
research the possibility of contracting for the use
of a copier and an operator.
Resolution 89-97E CM/Van Nort stated that the proposed amendment to
Amending Conflict the Conflict of Interest Code for Designated
of Interest Code Personnel would include Administrative Analysts
for Designated based on the fact that Analysts are sometimes sub -
City Personnel ject to potential conflicts.
M/Forbing opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs, requested
that the Resolution include members of the General
Plan Advisory Committee based on the fact that a
number of members have a direct conflict of
interest on how the City is being built.
CC/Burgess stated that the Committee is already
required to complete Conflict of Interest forms.
With no further comments offered, M/Forbing closed
the Public Hearing.
C/Werner moved, MPT/Kim seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 89-97E entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING
THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED
PERSONNEL. With the following Roll Call vote,
motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Papen, Werner, Nardella,
MPT/Kim, M/Forbing
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
CLOSED SESSION: M/Forbing adjourned the meeting to Closed Session
at 9:30 p.m. for discuss of Personnel matters.
ADJOURNMENT: M/Forbing reconvened the meeting to Regular Session
at 10:15 p.m. and the City Attorney declared that,
during Closed Session, the City Council directed
staff to communicate with Pacesetter Building
MAY 7, 1991 PAGE 10
ATTEST:
Mayor
Services regarding an apparent breach of contract
related to the provision of Building and Safety
services to the City.
There being no further business, M/Forbing
adjourned the meeting at 10:16 p.m.
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Councilmembers Papen and Rim
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, June 4, 1991
DATE: May 29, 1991
Attached is the Voucher Register dated June 4, 1991. As requested,
the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the
Finance Committee's review and approval prior to it's entry on the
Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated May 21, 1991 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
001 General Fund $467,555.66
115 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund 6,755.00
138 LLAD #38 Fund 7,428.29
139 LLAD #39 Fund 3,053.26
141 LLAD #41 Fund 83.14
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
lv /
Linda G. Ma n on
Senior Accoun ant
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
$484,875.35
Phyllis E. Papen
Councilmember
Jay C. Kim
Councilmember
f City of t'iaiaond Bar aa*
RUN TIME: 07:52 05130,191 V B U C H E R R E S I S T E R FTSE i
DUE THRU.............C-+bf04191
VEUCC'R NAME VENDOR I!3. FRcG'tr:AID �
L:
A CC U1,T ROi.TX-NO PA iCH "r;3,L_i,E F1 R1 J_��DESCRIPTION ^"Tr
I�1!3ICE .A�?Di�i ,;y�c CHEC1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A,'AJC r'j REfresh�Ent 4,,,__ ArA
Fur-= Equi.pm2n:!
0',�%1-43110-1200
drlo
14i5`44D
lil i_ii _L_
,zcs;4_
.�_... .L.. ;.
II'4 Lo y.5:-.0CK
hog.:=-uJ!.E SaJ;''1 r^i„�.
Y •` L� n 2 Lr LZ"!u
C G. E Linter j C ELualhE-
f;A 1 1'v 4t
�V
Vft. `':'
267 J
!inn* 1Q Su.ip 1 Es
F^ n:19
:'`6/L)4
2H,
j!Gt�t'E �rar 5'uUrel
y...�s
T_-.._ ✓moi l�k ., 4. --------
Ll
V”
--------
,!JY_ t___ .��J
iE't9
05114
1:bR1
TOTA?L DUE 'VEND; R --------
L.Si
City of Diaaand Bari
FUN TIME: D7:5Ei§51.':" VOUCHER REGISTER
DUE THRU.............06/34/91
VENDOR NAME ID.
ACCOUNT PRDJ,TX-NO BATCH PD.•_INEINO. ENTRY/DUB INVOICE DEvCRIET 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASED CAL ED
CE�iSCT _tLNtl
t�f r91 -40c? 2150, 1 kilt ill
ter.
v'40 -09 647
ThS
.L J1Ca ai! .1l�,
-
'_Q .�,:.�,.
3 'L01L34
1 1��lrTV
+;d G iu-C?50C.0 .d13HD1.B.—j ' C
;r,
PASE
t PREPAID
tl"'J':lN: DATE
--- ----------------------
I ', year memca:t:ip
s
T071 A+ DUCE ,,E;,.1KH-
L
.
�K
.-Ma.-,:y ;act:..
c_. c7
..,, z'•'i
tom. ub.,
i DUE VE .n R --------
_ uC_ ,
C,:lMl-P, 5121!91
TP,-`' M!
-
34
1 04'28
..
rLi :i:1_=
.�,. '
Reis:, NIPt� ;--an P121�..
:_.-:
TCT -AL DUE V—All—
•.-n
u
+�* City o Diamood Bar ***
FUN TIME: $7:E265113091 YOUCHER R[GlST[R
DUEE TH0U............. 06M#/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX'NO BATCH PO.LlNE/NO. ENTRY/DUE I��ICE DE -CRT
'---------------------------------------------------
Diamo d Bar Honda DB'Honda
Ea=-tm-zm Inc. Ea�mao
2 1060LC
*1-4�90-1100 1 L06@4C
Exs� ExxccS
y�01'4310�31A 1 10604C
Frank Piermarini Piprma�ini
GTEL G�l
0c) 2121S 1 ���A4C
6un»aL�s � Sun, 3oe A. 6onsa�ves
Helie: & Asaoiates Helle,
+? 0!1-21 1004 1 j604D
211,0-10 1-j- 6
Hoim!'R DeputH�meDepot
111MA Retiremnt Trus'
Ii,ijA
110a 0; 4, 4D
.3/
1\�04 D
10604D
`001'404�+009�
1 10604U
*001-40�A'��A
1 10@#D
1 210-0098
L 10604D
°801-422't"-00;�
1 106��D
��1'4310-009�
1 106��
P410t, 3
* * PREpAID ^ *
AMOUNT DATE C��K
---'------'------
AB2Y
06H#
138c Ford Teapo 8L
.3/
2,000.9�
T0T AL D'! -,E YEN.DD ---->
/,S14.3/
0SD9
86/h4
7488781
06/04
6.27
0B29
86/��
�97�q
O8icp �upli,s
298.16
�B29
A�/04
8it SLep
l��D'ZYEN,1D-9 --'-->
�44.4S
8B29
06/04
81K
Xtce
(,6/04
Lungu-PP12'PP1I
0B29
YE�--U- ---------
--->Pla
Yan%ort'Conlract
400.&�
29
06/04
i iz
36
05/29
O6/04
Ca. Cnn�-Mby
678.33
*82?
on
2,000.9�
A�/29
�6/04
Den� Prems June 9�
66*.46
�D29
06/04
Vision Prems-June 91
2�0.1�
7OT�L DUEYE�DOP ---->
9,4.62
�B29
A�/04
8it SLep
84.32
TDT�L DUE YEhD�R ---->
&4.32
-5/29
(,6/04
Lungu-PP12'PP1I
0B29
86/04
Yan%ort'Conlract
400.&�
29
06/04
Caf Cont'May
1`2q.97
05/29
O6/04
Ca. Cnn�-Mby
678.33
*82?
06/04
Caf Cnmt-May
3r2.24
A�/29
h6/A4
Ca; Cunt -Nay
639.16
AS/29
v'6/04
ay
�B29
�6/04
Caf Cont -May
B�.�1
+ City of Diamond bar#+
RLN TIME: 91:52 05/30/91 V i! O C H E R P, E G I S T E R
DUE THRU.............06/04/91
VENDDR 'SANE VENDOR ID,
ACCOUNT PROMI-NO BATCH PO.LINE;NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.Lin Retirement Trust It".MA
I^la r: 'dallet D v :Jlle'n I`iD3,
0 0 1-4210-"21!5 i 1A61 L
:r4+- 11. t.'
";rk Paper Co
a
X6'.1 L 5?'-c_1L'
h'l' 18 n.
r - �--
;,A. �.Cti�itf-G�ei'i: ; i De.- LAi;cr... 1..
'�'}: f•1-1}�.!i 1-J�!*J1 1 lv Ji9yb
# Y1c-546:L :`i`"4
': r74r-3 S t,,
1 _C14e e -..i L+a. l�ie� Le^lUL�
{;
1 r?I-409:-23_; L ;.06'I4D
Bei_ Enz-0c. __,,.__ t.3
�•:73
Mlid'8e5t Metals M'id`e=ti=t
*001-4331-2210 2 1,56,04i
PAGE 4
* PREPAID # x
AMOUNT DATE L E^:
---------------------------
(C.GNTINUED"
E _...R.
TOTAL DQE %.-------- .
,.
t _
?`'LT
05/04
d-21ii4
iL_
Pu v b dh,L N� CU
T:.DLA YEN -IO,: --------
it
"UTA- Nt' t i :^3 ______-_
-YL u'... -.._.
_....
t'zZ,.
4
= 7
r. ,
TOTAL D),E .'E;1;=,. --------
_: .,6
-
_'A.,i
7,
AS
i /v4
h. ..
Lon, r t S T v
--r,i ii-
T
Ej-
TOTAL DUEEND��i--------
_:a7.:;
City of Diamond Har f
RUNTIME: P%:5205j°'-3i91 VOUCHER REGISTER
DUE THRU.............061W91
VENDOR NAME VE :DOR Ir.
ACCOUNT PRO;.TX-NO BATCH ?O.iINE1N0. EITRYiDUE INVOICE DESCRI?TION
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Nrar:e f1Eueation Equip. M:rac.erEC
{v01-4S1S-22110 1 136;45
,Mousav: Sid
Mier=
M°;22S2.VISid
1 106N3
IF_'w .._��]_ _ J•1. .._FITC. _
1..:.
Pac Tel Cellu-!"51
Pac?5"aer hi"I"n2._ Svcs PaC85Ettc:
�r<01-4=x'747-t,E:'% 1ss?_ 4H
PuccCSelter Builid1'ng ,.,.-L5 GnC-s= 2
1li0,1-422,0-5231
2 1f6.34
"101-4221-6201 1 106tr4A
PAGE 5
t ?REPAID t
I�}viuiYT l AEC fiCl.i•
-------------------------------
2 7
______________________________
27
iib: t4
_ce=62
c'w'Sa r_S �vi,.v
y
- r - ---------`
y,
n -,C M
T'T:: ________
.Jin_ L'tiC
_..
_._T
i_ .'4
T'e IJI Lj `i� �.r,v..,i--------_ I
Y,•_•
vRrv, 11'n_ rJl
ITL.•J'?
;24sj
a
Ma' r2rs fur 1 2 St= ..,
111i9 ,
TrIT,: n' c i,_ Iri,4
a u
0:,129
06104
1126
Pi.ar, CnE_k PEeS-Mav
4 1'4.F_
09:29
061=34
2,129
81 Selvice—Niv
14.0.:3..,3
T0 'L DUE VENDC1R --------.
18 122 .44
t
City
of
Diamond
Bar *ff
RUN TIME: 21:52 05113B/51
V
0 U C H
E R R E 6
I 5 T E R
PAGE b
DUE
THRU
.............Bb!G4!41
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* PREPAID
AC CUPT PRti.3.TY-N31
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIATC4 PO.L14EfNO.
ENTRYIDUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTIOtd
AMD a:T
DATE
v:ECK
Pali -all Transfer
Pair=!"-
�it:-:"L`'
pi 1344"
t C. t.•
:i"
rr1F
�, .4
rr -i- _N^ i
PaYrC%1 i anct Cr '1.
u d. Cs�,4jcz
2)i_/,'
1ij11:
TOTAL PREPAID A"OfT ----
:?.`r'
?IOT;.i DOE VENDEUs9 ----------
..
Pitney Bcwn
Pitney2cwE
*J?'•1-4':4�'i-�1f '
7
1 F�j R
ti �`-
� i a�
P: --Fane Cra`a Ren} -i'
i p: „
L`1yi C�[t
e
t:,:.;y_,
",�_�d�:
�i"",`a
- i4._�.�l�i ree
posy au2 i{'r Pi '
st:•'/''i:�(,
i2)4t
fLt T4 2
1i
a4'r �i''Pied
EJ". 2 ?
4
yanlen1'^'. cL
� �s
Yu'':C LiICl P?=lrr',cnf
F SJ
vV:-tli-i•:^:
1''...0
_._
;=a!::
=t aen
27
1.6.411
,.u..11i
'iL13`
i
1d;C>t4r
r %�-'•t:,r`•54
Basic cv.-Par",s
if -L DU E1114-11,01 _______._'
lGnr.rat!i2rir's>GC r. .
inc
RKA
t�5 I I 12 2 [.;
i
1%ki r
5;
L
va
_ , ,.
".rG!
ihi[ErClnee''1
J2 L
,:.e11 -_451
6 A 4 D
2)
: v
JF
:
.VL
i�U�e14 Iil.''
i_'"h/
i3
PnU-blurry Sea:
.L7Y'
�5 24:l
:
t?i. 3?10-55'%2
'�7'�SC ti-i•L'S;
,: i,
1
fes,
..`'Y
�j i
"_ .i{_.
:.r t�,
Y!•,; ..
E: - '.'a-
�:'7.T-iii 3'�,.. .,, ___::
D.
!G._,
!-1FT-ur
�r i55
11_i-_
_,
r,., r,y C f r
r."r-11:.1 LrivL.i i_t
tl.. -
-iS�1: i1
9` ':�i.__l/1
ti PRE r..�"nli A:'0i;'F
r
�;;nr;rarer;<i;5)s:�_ C.E.
inc
R,:A
001" 1-2)9-2 i.:-12) 2 1
2
ir'6 4D
ti711r%
06"'V4
.{
?i b;87f
Flaw! Ph— 2 i. Cvcs
i4t2"�i'.✓�
p �n
ilii DUEL(�LiLh ---
4.219.3.
City of Diaaand Har +*g
RUM TIME: 01:5205/;;0/91 VOUCHER RE6ISTER
CUE THRU.............WOW?!
VENDOR MADE VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PRCJ.TR-NC HATCH PC.LIME/MC. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DE CRIPTiPjN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.. . i;, Valley „'=. (h of Cities qfl: VAs i -i C.iy
r:
Han tabr;ei ',211ey city SvV'-
Lia_
1,r'ui':=a., Ca. Eoii=on S= aEdi5e
2 106-"4A
r_ :, _ r + r
Q otmftr` La. r'i 151.1 S C a[C'__ IP
i 1•:i7 -i -F73 3, -2:11 26 2 1'L' ?, 11 ':'-:. i'•o. r
�G'11 L%=;'^ _.. Fd:SDC ter: i'•-`'�'_-'
r318-2 26 22 10 6
Southern Ca. Edisun SutaEdi=_e''
f�%1-4510-212U 1 1?�;;•'4A C5rt9 ;,c;y;
PAGE 1
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECt:.
--------------------------
J'et7
TraffiC Cant:ul 2.�I24.96
,_.r.� ivy....,�, ,
++�
City a
Diaaand
Bar +++
RUN TINE: 01:52 OSYS 191
u 0 U C H
E R R E
G I S T E R
PAGE e
DUE THRU
.............06194/91
UENDGR NAME
VENDOR ID.
+ + PREPAID + }
ACCOUNT PRO-I.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PQ.LINP-fNU.
ENTRi1DUE
INVOICE
DESCRiPTIOlH"C:U�;I
DnTE CHECK
} :1-4- i=i.D
i
1:ov'iy
;i29 4�'
4J6?M4
r *, r2 1(.ur �_�
j: i i
_
TOTALENDO,-
it iL LvL %i.�:+
v'Lv11L v,u I:?surv.:c= a!
Di'_
17
_dai :1
SlIl JL
04 -al -2110-1@05
2�1
604J
CjS Iz. v6i944
Li := Inc, P eI-.: !:
"'�'`'• _
lural._ Center Ira -vel
_i'in .2-_E .0
.4
3i-`bi"1
,':_-5•F1lte."'#uP� i_. _�.
....
lei:gQ
.. 'u: {:I o
It.yi..:
._.. sv 5. ♦
-__ .-
Tri,:
}.]s_-4u2A-Lii
❑v 2'qCr r 4
i
1203 L!"r
-vI•.__ I'vl�
3�:.::.il_
Uc
Z
1
061
Dist..,:_ F'.::.= Ser;
10Y!iii�Ii
%; 1ri4
� r
T,]Tn DUE u:?d',-,_
Unn-caI
!"C_al
} '=-.fi'<'-'�=1,.'
1
1�''rlth
iLQ �.vI�,L
490435
Fu::- I
=-'--
}l-!4093 2311!
rrit
2
1@ar4A
Ozl/2i �i6/U4
49'0419
cue1-Seneral
a''1-4?i''-+..�• � c;,iy.
2
1;6l14
9517^ 06/£4
49048S
fJ :-P:Iro
-
}ar31-431?-:31z�7
E
10604.
cc,?; M61z4
55,:451
Fu. -Perks
+3r1 -4316-231i
4
s'MC �A
' +`�`'' `
'E9 B' ID
'r!L G. 4
6y+'4_
?`}
Fuel -Pa i:�
r
14•?.^
+!3!:1-14:3`.+.-3310
i
1Vs-'!4:
?9 ^61 Yr4
80, A 4 2
F!+_. -lied=. ,1
Al'
+s3�.i-4313-�5`1ria5,'=-
r'B4
89;451
Fu1-Park5 _
; ; • H _
!!! E!ly.o! D!,■an! Bar !,!
Ra 2£:E:9 6/30/51 V000HER §E61STER
DUE IRw. .. ... 6104/91
SNS w£ Vee§ 5.
ACCOUNT 9O JRg &!a e zirlg. ENTRY/DUE Igze EEE22a
----------------------------------------------
ba«
Van G Robert L. Ga»R@§
1¥640- § !1060'4 623«»4
#D2 lyw@!2&
w&(E25
E9:eE:s---->
!a,73
�z� RSS
is�2
03365*
4124
!R2@a§2a
11054
E2l6Z6
eA
,«2@522§
lDgg
£2E
da§
W g! w%, E « wwlE 2;
6292£55 11014 £296Ri
EDx G7#%,E& U 2022
654§3\2& !1066§ 62362*
PAGE 9
! ! PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
—-------------
za2ws�
E9:eE:s---->
!a,73
A;rrare-TCMA »eg Re
21,24
TOTAL 2EVEND-DR ----------
4124
w&raReg;SR
. 2K@
K\; az
eA
2 yP®§2i----:
-a,=
2@222 g7
\aSg
e%L2EEN2§---->
%5240
»&x23 2!
Q£Re
2T£ PR -P4
2I£ 51,---------
^
26 06
2T£ Spj-�AI------9
4\ER5
+++ City of Diamond Har +*+
RUN TIME: 47:S2 05130!91 VOUCHER REGISTER
FUND SUMMARY REPORT
DUE THRU.............@6!D4/91
DISBURSE SIL GjE WILL POST GIE HAS POSTED
FUN:' TOTAL DIRECT PAY REVENUE EXPENSE REVENUE EH ENSE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N)lCe germ Fiend 46S,234.47 54,139.=4
yy
u'�ILLi'�U 4Ji Fund
IMSol d WHN Fad; 6,i5m
128La AAD 1:38 Fund 1.428.29
__G.and hJ io,'s: Fu "F18.14
25K.1.P, Find L'i:j.'00
14 EUD x41 Find &M4
A__ F tUiDS 484.187S. -K- - 5i.229.29
PAGE 1
FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
REVENUE E PE SE
-------------------------
ws;95.ci
r.
6;%15.00
7 401 M
141.05
------------------------
42q %,
AGENDA NO. 2
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: City Manager
FROM: Linda G. Magnusort','Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Statement, April 30, 1991
DISCUSSION:
Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement
for the month of April, 1991. This statement shows the cash balances
for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, and
investment account balances.
At the end of April, there was a check which had been issued but had not
cleared the bank. Due to the significant amount of the check, the funds
remained invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund. Therefore, the
Treasurer's Statement shows a negative amount in the General Account.
RECOMMENDATION•
Approve the April, 1991 Treasurer's Statement.
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
REVIEWED BY:
------------L��-'�--------------------- -------------------
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Asst. City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
April 30, 1991
GENERAL FUND
$2,533,866.30
$1,367,055.78
$786,838.61
$3,114,083.47
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
127,543.49
26,844.16
154,387.65
GAS TAX FUND
1,692,006.58
127,632.90
751.70
1,818,887.78
TRANSIT TX (PROP A) FD
866,052.78
112,679.32
783.17
977,948.93
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FD
0.00
0.00
FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND
(236.98)
(236.98)
INTEGRATED WASTE MGT FD
(1,676.94)
7,048.60
10,792.84
(5,421.18)
STATE PARK GRANT FUND
0.00
0.00
LANDSCAPE DIST #38 FD
1,563.39
72,703.10
5,978.87
68,287.62
LANDSCAPE DIST #39 FD
216,178.73
40,963.34
10,444.90
246,697.17
LANDSCAPE DIST #41 FD
72,289.42
45,348.32
5,324.69
112,313.05
GRAND AV CONST FUND
670,253.63
1,109.48
669,144.15
CHINO HILLS CONST FUND
0.00
0.00
TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE FD
325,978.00
6,429.37
332,407.37
CAP IMPROVEMENT PRJ FD
0.00
18,643.32
(18,643.32)
SB 821 FUND
18,709.00
61.50
18,770.50
SELF INSURANCE FUND
135,064.97
2,654.91
137,719.88
TOTALS
$6,657,592.37
$1,809,421.30
$840,667.58
$0.00 $7,626,346.09
SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS:
INVESTMENTS:
GENERAL ACCOUNT
($34,631.74)
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
(522.17)
PETTY CASH ACCOUNT
500.00
TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS
TIME CERTIFICATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER
L. A.I.F.
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
$0.00
0.00
7,661,000.00
($34,653.91)
7,661,000.00
TOTAL CASH $7,626,346.09
QITV OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MARCH 14, 1991
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order
at 7:05 p.m. at the City Hall, 21660 East Copley
Drive, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE:
by Commissioner Meyer.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Plunk, Meyer, Stitt, and Vice
Chairman Ruzicka. Chairman Whelan was absent
(excused).
Also present were Parks and Maintenance Director
Charles Janiel, Administrative Analyst Kellee
Fritzal, and Superintendent Don Hensley.
MATTERS FROM THE
Don Schad, residing at 1824 Shaded Wood Road,
AUDIENCE:
stated the Earth Day program was successful last
year. He offered to spirit a program this year.
Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel
responded that the Rotary Club has expressed an
interest in planting trees, and suggested Mr.
Schad get in contact with them. He specified that
the trees will have to be planted in an area
already irrigated.
Don Schad asked permission from the Commission to
plant trees at parks that are already irrigated,
but are sparse of trees.
VC/Ruzicka requested a sketch from Mr. Schad
indicating the area where trees would be planted.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar and the Minutes of February 14, 1991 and
the Minutes of February 28, 1991.
I
NEW BUSINESS:
Leasing office at Staff recommended that the City lease the office
Summitridge Park at Summitridge Park, to the Ranch Festival, under
the stated terms and conditions.
C/Plunk asked the amount the City received last
year for the Ranch Festival..
AA/Kellee Fritzal stated that the funds had not
been received.
C/Meyer asked what public purpose it serves to
lease the office.
PMD/Daniel stated that the purpose is to offer
support to the Ranch Festival.
March 14, 1991
Page 2
C/Meyer cautioned that this action could establish
precedent for other groups to ask for offices in
public buildings.
C/Plunk inquired if a stipulation could be
included in the contract stating that if the Park
and Recreation Department would need the office,
they would have 30 days to vacate.
AA/Fritzal stated that a termination clause could
be included.
Motion was made by C/Plunk, seconded by. C/Stitt
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve staff's
recommendation subject to a 30 day notice
termination clause, if the City should need the
complex.
Sub -Committee C/Plunk noted that the recreation programming is
Update listed as resolved. She stated she was under the
impression that it is still an ongoing committee.
PMD/Janiel explained that the listed committees
are still presently functioning.
C/Meyer volunteered for the Master Plan
subcommittee.
C/Plunk volunteered for the Senior Citizen sub-
committee.
PMD/Janiel informed the Commission that the Senior
Citizen subcommittee had internal problems and
disbanded. They should come back together when
the Senior Citizen Center becomes more of a
reality.
C/Meyer volunteerbd for the Master Plan sub-
committee.
VC/Ruzicka inquired of staff when a good time
would be to meet with the Senior Citizens.
AA/Fritzal suggested that it could be a good idea
to meet about once a quarter to hear their
opinions on issues.
VC/Ruzicka requested staff, when in contact with
the Senior Citizens, to inform them that he is
available to listen in at their next meeting.
C/Plunk asked for copies of reports on the
Heritage Park renovation.
PMD/Janiel stated that he is unaware of any
written reports received from the subcommittees.
March 14, 1991
OLD BUSINESS:
Page 3
C/Stitt stated he has some information on Heritage
Park dating back July 1990 that he will offer to
C/Plunk.
VC/Ruzicka inquired when the next meeting of the
Park Field Usage sub -committee is.
PMD/Janiel stated as of now an exact scheduled
date is not known. The critical meetings are
twice a year, just before scheduling.
VC/Ruzicka stated that the meetings serve to give
vent for a lot of steam. He requested staff set
up another meeting, for the next quarter, in
April, 1991 or May, 1991.
Parks facilities Staff recommended that the Parks and Recreation
use ordinance, & Commission consider the establishment of both a
motion picture parks facilities use ordinance and a motion
film photography picture film still photography ordinance.
ordinance.
AA/Fritzal stated the parks facilities use
ordinance will establish guidelines to handle all
parks facilities use requests from sports
organizations to one time users. There will be a
policy given to the user groups which will explain
the policies. The film permit will give Diamond
Bar the opportunity to set up their own policies.
C/Plunk inquired if there will be a sliding scale,
at the discretion of an appointee, to evaluate the
special needs of the groups.
AA/Fritzal stated that it will be up to the
Commission_ to decide if a sliding scale is
preferro-d. The usual procedure is to set a one
time fee to avoid selective enforcement. Staff
would ensure special requirements.
C/Meyer asserted that the Parks and Recreation
Commission is an advisory body to the City Council
on matters regarding parks and recreational
activities in the City. Adopting ordinances is a
legislative matter and solely the responsibility
of the Council. The City Council has not given
directives to the Commission to develop any
ordinances, nor to advise on any ordinances.
PMD/Janiel suggested the Commission develop a
manual of park policies and procedures describing
the hours, priorities, and policies.
March 14, 1991
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Page 4
C/Meyer maintained there is a difference of an
ordinance, of a resolution, and of a policy
manual. The Commission should not insert things
into an ordinance unless so directed -by the
legislative body. There should be clear cut
direction from the City Council. The Commission
should -serve from an advisory standpoint.
C/Plunk contended that the Commission has the
authority to advise the City Council on those
matters felt appropriate.
C/Meyer requested a profile of the ordinances that
currently regulate Parks and Recreation. He
requested staff develop a policy type manual to
help the Commission regulate and promote the use
of the parks and also to include information on
what the other communities are doing in regards to
park policies.
AA/Fritzal stated staff will bring back the
information to the Commission for the meeting of
March 28, 1991 for further discussion.
Commissioners C/Stitt commented on the amount of people enjoying
Peterson Park. He asked for an update of the old
Post office.
AA/Fritzal explained that the site is currently
being cleared due to it's hazardous condition.
VC/Ruzicka stated that the DBIA liked the Park
Superintendent's monthly report. The report
should be submitted coinciding with the
"Windmills" monthly distribution for the purpose
of keeping the report current.
AA/Fritzal informed the Commission that Deputy
Luter will also be writing a report on vandalism
in the area, as requested by the Commission.
C/Plunk noted that it would be more appropriate to
have a bigger flag in the meeting room. She also
mentioned that the City Birthday Celebration
committee is in need of 19 volunteers for the run.
AA/Fritzal stated another flag will be looked
into. She stated the Commission may want to be
available for the Second Anniversary ceremony.
C/Plunk stated Dr. Hockwalt is interested in
reconvening the calendar committee for the school
district, with special interest on special events.
March 14, 1991 Page 5
C/Plunk inquired if the programming committee will
be meeting soon.
AA/Fritzal responded that they will meet after
April 19, 1991. A definite date will be set
within the next month.
C/Plunk inquired if the Commission will be
eligible to vote on a recommendation to the Walnut
School Board in regards to site "D".
AA/Fritzal explained that the City already gave
their official statement at the March 11, 1991
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by C/Stitt
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
8:35 p.m.
Resp `tvz'e
,
`G
Charles Janiel
Secretary
Atte
Joe Ruzi¢ka}
vice Cha m n
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MARCH 28, 1991
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
MATTERS FROM THE
AUDIENCE:
Chairman Whelan called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. at the Community Room, 1061 Grand Avenue,
Diamond Bar, California.
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
Commissioner Meyer.
Commissioners Plunk, Meyer, Stitt, Vice Chairman
Ruzicka, and Chairman Whelan.
Also present were Parks and Maintenance Director
Charles Janiel, Administrative Analyst Kellee
Fritzal, Administrative Analyst Troy Butzlaff,
Superintendent Don Hensley, and Contract Secretary
Liz Myers.
The following citizens discussed their concerns
regarding "photo day's" at the Sycamore Canyon
Park.
Sharon Shephard, residing at 23821 Sunset Crossing,
stated that the young models are encouraged to pose
in a lewd and lascivious manner; the activities
occur during park hours while young childran are
playing; many of the models wear string bathing
suits, and are openly solicited by the photo-
graphers. These type of activities should be
curtailed in our parks.
Tom Shephard, residing at 23821 Sunset Crossing,
complained that the photographers pushed people to
get them out of their way; there were no police
present; and it was impossible to find parking.
The event is unnerving.
Sandra Goosman, residing at 23523 Sunset Crossing,
stated that there is not an adequate area to
change;! the models, many aged 14 to 16 years old,
are without parental supervision; they wear
suggestive outfits; and there are no police.
Chair/Whelan explained that it is difficult to
address and enforce an ordinance based on a
morality issue. This community input is valuable
and will be taken into consideration.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Meyer
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar.
OLD BUSINESS:
Don Stokes Tom Greenberg, President of the Diamond Bar
Memorial Jaycees, stated that the Diamond Bar Jaycees wish
to propose the placement of an honorary plaque
within the boundaries of the yet to be named park
March 28, 1991 Page 2
i
of Diamond Bar. They would like to put the plaque,
temporarily, in the foyer of City Hall until such i.
park is ready. The brass plaque, 18" by 2411, and
will have the Jaycee logo at the bottom.
Nominations will be solicited from all the service
clubs in Diamond Bar, however, the final selection
will be made by the Jaycees. The Jaycees will bear
the entire cost of erecting this plaque along with
the costs of adding one name per year.
Chair/Whelan inquired if there will be criteria
posted for all the service groups for determining
"honorary" candidates.
Mr. Greenberg responded that the criteria will be
posted, but explained that the issue has not been
finalized as of yet.
C/Meyer acknowledged that public recognition of
people who have provided service to the community
is an admirable idea and worthy of a lot of
consideration. It would seem that we should be
looking for a place that could accommodate all the
service clubs that would provide recognition to
other members.
Mr. Greenberg stated that other service clubs will
have the ability to nominate. The input from other
clubs will be very important and will not be
ignored.
Chair/Whelan inquired if the Jaycee would be able
to solicit support from other interested groups
between now and the next meeting. Upon receiving
Mr. Greenberg's affirmation, he stated that it
would appear that a subcommittee is needed to
organize all the) information into a report. He
recommended a formation of a subcommittee to meet
with the Jaycees, and compile a report including
the criteria and a list of interested groups.
C/Meyer and VC/Ruzicka volunteered for the
subcommittee.
Chair/Whelan directed staff to put the matter on
the agenda for the next meeting as an action item.
PD/Daniel suggested the matter be scheduled for the
meeting of April 18, 1991 due to conflicting
schedules.
Park Use Policy AA/Fritzal addressed the Commission concerning the
establishment of a park usage policy, as well as
the items to be covered in the policy. It is
staff's recommendation that the Commission
March 28, 1991 Page 3
recommend to the City Council the establishment of
a parks facilities use ordinance.
C/Plunk addressed some of the items that should be
indicated in the policy including applicable County
codes and review by sheriff and fire.
C/Meyer noted that the goals of the park and
recreation element should be elaborated and dealt
with in the General Plan. He inquired what kind of
problems there are using the existing County
ordinance for the utilization of the parks.
AA/Fritzal explained that the existing ordinance
does not deal with the reservation system. It is
up to the Commission to decide on a policy.
C/Meyer noted the hiring of Brea to give the City
guidance in this area. He inquired if the
Commission should set policy without any type of
input from trained professionals.
AA/Fritzal stated input has been received. She
further recommended the formation of a subcommittee
with respect that the General Plan will be drafted
in June of 1991.
VC/Ruzicka speculated if the City will be better
able to enforce the current ordinance once the City
takes over the scheduling of parks July 1, 1991.
PD/Daniel stated that the purpose at this time is
not too look at the park and recreation element.
Policy needs to be set for the day to day
activities. Staff needs direction from the
Commission as to policy and procedures to include:
I
1. Approve a forum.
2. Identify the parks and facilities to be used,
and the scheduling of groups to use them.
3. Insurance requirements.
4. Equipment usage.
5. Special requests.
C/Meyer stated that in one hand staff is referring
to the issue of administrative policies and grading
user groups, and on the other hand referring to the
need to have the authority to make those policies.
He requested clarification.
PD/Daniel stated the policy and procedures will be
adopted by ordinance that will give staff and the
Commission administrative guidelines to set
priorities.
March 28, 1991 Page 4
Motion was made by C/Stitt, seconded by C/Plunk and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to grant staff the opportunity
to prepare a report to be reviewed by the City
Council and the city attorney for the
recommendation of a policy for a park facilities
use ordinance.
AA/Fritzal stated that there is no need to form a
new subcommittee. The parks master plan
subcommittee and the user group subcommittee are
established and either can deal with this issue.
VC/Ruzicka suggested, with the consensus of the
Commission, that the issue be assigned to the parks
master plan subcommittee.
Motion picture/ AA/Fritzal addressed the Commission in regards to.
still photography the concern relating to the use of City park
ordinance facilities by commercial motion picture and/or
still photography firms, companies, or ventures.
The Commission can choose to recommend that the
City retain the established procedure adopted under
the County Code, or recommend that a new ordinance
be created to handle all public property in Diamond
Bar.
C/Plunk inquired if the ordinance can be written in
which scouts, sports leagues, and recognizable
charitable purposes are exempt from the ordinance.
C/Meyer would like an ordinance that is explicable
across the board for everyone. There needs to be a
legal rationale to exclude a group from the use of
the parks.
C/Stitt stated the ordinance should be restrictive
for commercial purposes, but not for individual
uses.
VC/Ruzicka suggested that staff inform the Chamber
of Commerce of this issue with the purpose of
receiving any input from them.
C/Plunk stated that, according Joe McManus of the
Chamber of Commerce, photographers need to receive
age verification and parental releases, or subject
release which is standard business procedure.
AA/Fritzal stated the City is not involved with
this standard business procedure. This issue is
the concern of the camera operator.
C/Meyer stated that the City already has an
ordinance that was adopted by the County code and
never used. The ordinance has never been used by
March 28, 1991 Page 5
the City so there is no bases to judge it's
effectiveness.
AA/Butzlaff explained that currently, since the
policy is in place by the County of Los Angeles,
the City is able to attach itself to that policy
and, as a result, does not have to regulate that
policy ourselves. Should it be the Commission's
desire to implement, or draft an additional policy,
or ordinance to specifically regulate commercial
film usage, then it would be incumbent upon the
City to do such regulation and maintain the
regulatory measure of that specific ordinance.
VC/Ruzicka inquired if it is possible to add to the
ordinance and still ride with the County on
enforcement.
AA/Butzlaff stated that the City of Diamond Bar
could increase fees, or add specific requirements
and still ride with the County on enforcement.
However, the County will only enforce the policy in
regards to the issuance of permits. If specifics
of the permit is violated, it becomes a City issue
and the local jurisdiction would have to enforce
those issues.
C/Plunk inquired if photo shoots could be limited
by the length of time, location, and/or the time
per year it is used by a single organization.
AA/Butzlaff stated that the Commission could adopt
specific times that would be consistent with the
overall park usage policy, and have those included
as an overall filming policy as well.
Motion Was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to continue
on with the use of the present policy to determine
it's effectiveness.
INFORMATION:
Monthly Parks PD/Janiel requested more direction from the
Update Commission on the by line of the article to be
placed in the Windmill.
VC/Ruzicka suggested that the report be placed
under the by line of the Commission's chairman
because he has access to both staff and Commission,
and to the organizations of the City.
PD/Janiel suggested the report be done on a semi
regular or regular basis.
March 28, 1991 Page 6
VC/Ruzicka stated the park maintenance report could
be done on a quarterly bases, and include comments
from Deputy Luter, if desired, and written under
the by line of the Chairman, but not necessarily
written by the Chairman.
Chair/Whelan concurred and requested help from
C/Plunk.
:ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Plunk requested that a discussion on banner poles
included at the next meeting.
C/Plunk informed the Commission that Dr. Halkwalt
visited the YMCA/Little League fields.
C/Meyer stated his plans to meet with staff for the
purpose of identifying recreational facilities that
provide service or access to the City.
Chair/Whelan requested an update on the Brea
proposal.
AA/Fritzal stated that a Professional Service
Agreement (PSA) is currently being drafted. The
contract should be in effect by May 1, 1991. The
Commission should be able to have a discussion with
Brea at the April 18, 1991 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by
Chair/Whelan and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjou-n the
meeting at 8:52 p.m. /--�
Respec jz'�veW,
Charles aniel
Secreta v
Attest:
Pat Whelan
Chairman
CARL WARREN & CO.
Insurance Adjusters
Claims Administrators
PO Box 25180
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5180
1714) 9723146
(800) 572.6900
TO: City of Diamond Bar
Attention: Robert Van Nort
P
Date: May 21, 1991
Re: Claim: White vs Diamond Bar
Claimant: Shirley White
D/Event: 1-22-91
Rec'd Y/Office: 5-15-91
Our File: S 67799 AB
We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take
the ac ion indicated below:
CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant.
[� CLAIM INSUFFICIENCY: In accordance with the telephone conversation
of , 19 , a notice of insufficiency must be mailed
to the claimant no later than , 19.THIS MUST BE
MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORIGINAL
CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SUBMIT A "REJECTION" LETTER. See
Government Code Sections 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4.
AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to
the claimant, refecting this additional/amended claim.
LATE CLAIM RESPONSE: Return the original claim material to the
claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only
recourse is to file a written "Application for Leave to Present
a Late Claim". (Retain copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE MAILED
TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR
OFFICE. DO NOT SEND A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code
Section 911.4.
[] APPLICATION REJECTION: Reject claimant's "Application for Leave
to Present a Late Claim". See Government Code Section 911.8.
[] TAKE NO ACTION: Defer any written response to the claimant
pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.
Vetruly yours,
cc: S.C.J.P.I.A. CAIWARREN & COMPANY
U
�- C Gl `� E [)
n[ A nso �n[�
CLAM FOR DAMAGES t SE I Ep `+F FILING STAMP
Claims for death or for injury to person or personal property or growing i t;?, 5 } j 1i: 6
crops must be filed within 6 monthsof the occurrence which caused the injury.
All other claims must be filed within one year. See Government Code 911.2.
Read the entire claim before filing. Attach copies of estimates, bills, re-
ceipts, and all other documents in support of the claim. Attach separate sheets
for diagrams and additional information, if needed. SIGN EACH SHEET.
To
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA '
CLAIMAPT
r.n . , 1I c
MAILING ADDRESS TO
BE SENT
OF
DATE, TIME & PLACE OF OCCORRENCE
ESCRlPTlON OF OFCCURRENCE 71h-
-T -7
h
.T-7 tJA S Lye��, �h� � f 4 flec-t4 o'U CGckd
c? 0 7/71fu oc 1 40
%hckh/°/ ��s ort 7��r Sr Lle
�1 s
NAMES PijBLI - EMPLOYEES WHO CAUSE R i a ei e rl/e e Cl 04 wU 7L (f' �*A/ied
EXPL�APA�ON F, H7PUBLICENTITYISRESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY, DAMAGE ORLOSS !
41,,11
�n
��fC//J /�l.l_SC�
CAA12i
�MES ADD ESSES & PHONE NUMBERS OF WITH
ITEMIZED AMOUNT OF c
& oC� �•� - %% �1J7"Pi o, CjiTi C/! �iv p� - l of Inc
n
r&k/ 14C
§1__GNXTL1RE OF CLAI ANT OR EPRESEN ATIVE DATE TYP D OR PRI TE NAME
s
CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED WARNING: Presentation of a false claim is a criminal offense,
and filed with the Clerk of the Public Entity. punishable by fine and imprisonment,. See Penal Code 72.
Cl) _ - a. r 0
Z
J
N
w
U
2
W
IY
W
LL
Cc
W
2
W
N
z
W
V
J
a
tap>
}V�
wL
=
4
VJ
u
�}t!Fra
U
N
f�l
W
W
••
J
4`
Cl) _ - a. r 0
Z
J
N
w
U
2
W
IY
W
LL
Cc
W
2
W
N
z
W
V
J
a
}V�
0
=
4
VJ
u
Q
U
N
f�l
W
Cl) _ - a. r 0
Z
J
N
w
U
2
W
IY
W
LL
Cc
W
2
W
N
z
W
V
J
w
IJ
3 w
LY Q
{11 CL,
a:z
w QI
�<y1 \l
Cl
z
nz
ltil +�1
2
0
=
4
VJ
u
Q
U
N
f�l
W
W
••
J
w
w
IJ
3 w
LY Q
{11 CL,
a:z
w QI
�<y1 \l
Cl
z
nz
ltil +�1
AGENDA NO. I!
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: City Manager
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson( Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Proposed F.Y. 91-92 Investment Policy
DISCUSSION:
The State of California requires that municipalities annually adopt a City
investment policy (section 53646 of the Government Code). Attached please find
the Resolution and proposed investment policy.
The proposed investment policy basically states the goal of the City's investment
activities, the types of investments the City will invest idle funds in, and the
monthly reporting requirements.
There have been no changes in the investment policy for FY91-92, from the adopted
policy for FY90-91.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution 91- which adopts the FY 91-92 Investment Policy.
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
REVIEWED BY: / f QQ�
---------- - ------------------------ ---------- --
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Asst. City Manager
AGENDA NO.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
---------------------------- -------- ---
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: James DeStefano, Planning Direc
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution de ying an extension of CUP 86-410
requested by Stephen Chung/Jeff Jenkins and Carolyn Seitz.
BACKGROUND:
On May 21, 1991 the City Council concluded the public discussion on an appeal of
a Planning Commission decision to deny an extension of time request for CUP 86-
410. The extension request involved a proposed 36,000 square foot office building
to be located at 1200 South Brea Canyon Road.
The Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution to deny the
extension request.
Attached to this report is a Resolution of denial for Council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution denying the extension of time request.
Attachment
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
REV
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
N/A
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belange
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
AGENDA NO. LD
---------------
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
------------------------------------ - ----
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: James DeStefano, Planning Directo
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution appro ing an extension of CUP 1634-1
requested by the Evangelical Free Church.
On May 21, 1991 the City Council concluded a public hearing -on an appeal of a
Planning Commission decision regarding an extension of time request for
CUP 1634-1.
The Council directed staff and the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution approving
the requested action.
Attached to this report is a Resolution of approval for Council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution approving the extension of time request.
Attachment
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
N/A
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belang�i'�
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
AGENDA NO.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
----------------
DATE: May 30, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
.`e%`" —
FROM: Sid Mousavi, City Engineer/Director of Pub c Works
SUBJECT: Landscaping Assessment District No. 38
BACKGROUND
The Board of Supervisors approved the formation of City of Diamond Bar Landscaping
Assessment District No. 38 for the purpose of providing funds for the maintenance
of landscaped open -spaces located therein pursuant to the provisions of the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1971 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highway Code of the State of California. Upon incorporation, jurisdiction of
these Districts has been transferred from the County to the City of Diamond Bar.
DISCUSSION
The City Council at their regular meeting on April 16, 1991 adopted a Resolution
and directed the staff to prepare the Engineer's Report for the maintenance of all
open spaces within the City including irrigation, pruning, fertilization, pest
control, weed control, drainage system, irrigation control system improvements,
and miscellaneous related work within easement areas for said purpose within the
City. However, the Resolution did not included the maintenance of the City's
parks. The attached Resolution authorizes the Engineer to include the
restoration, maintenance and improvements of the parks within the City's
Assessment District No. 38.
(Narrative continued on the next page)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
N
---------------------- -------------------U
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
Landscaping Assessment District No. 38
May 30, 1991
Page 2
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution and direct
staff to prepare the Engineer's report for Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Landscaping
Assessment District No. 38.
AGENDA NO. /.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Sid Mousavi, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Landscape Assessment District 39
On April 16, 1991, the City Council directed staff to prepare the Engineer's
Report for the Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Landscaping Assessment District No. 39.
DISCUSSION
The attached Engineer's Report for the City's Landscaping District No. 39, which
is prepared pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
(Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of
California), includes authority for the report, plans and specifications,
estimated costs of improvements, a diagram for the districts, and assessments.
Included herewith are resolutions of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
approving the Engineer's Report and fixing and giving notice of a time and place
for a public hearing on the levy of an assessment on said District for Fiscal Year
1991-1992.
(Narrative continued on the next page)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
------------------------- -----------p-----
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belang
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
The amount assessed upon the lands within the District for Fiscal Year 1990-1991
was $130 per parcel. However, the amount estimated to be assessed for Fiscal Year
1991-1992 is reduced to $124.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions and set the
time and place for a hearing before the Council on the question of the levy of the
proposed assessment on assessable lots within District 39, and direct the City
Clerk to advertise the hearing.
1991 - 1992
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for the City of Diamond Bar
Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 39
Prepared By:
ASL Consultants, Inc.
55 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 200
Arcadia, California 91006
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared under the authority and direction
of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar pursuant to their Resolution No.
and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
SECTION 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for the improvements within
the district are on file in the City Hall of the City of Diamond Bar and are
available for public inspection. Reference is hereby made to said plans and
specification for the exact location and nature of the improvements and is hereby
made a part of this report.
SECTION 3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS
The total estimated costs for the maintenance of
improvements within the district are as follows:
REVENUE:
1991-92
1990-91 1990-91 City Mgr
Adopted Budget Adi. Budget Recommended
2550
Approp. Fund Balance
$210,000
$241,979
$175,513
3015
Prop. Tx -Sp Assessment
103,480
103,480
98,306
3810
Interest Revenue
12.000
TOTAL
313,480
345,459
273,819
APPROPRIATIONS:
4539-0010
Salaries
9,650
24,600
4539-0030
Part Time Wages
635
4539-0080
Benefits
1,352
3,700
4539-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
328
1,000
4539-0085
Medicare Exp.
151
400
4539-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
980
3,500
4539-2126
Utilities
45,850
45,850
43,200
4539-2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg.
2,800
2,800
2,800
4539-4000
Professional Svcs
10,000
10,000
2,500
4539-5400
Contract Svcs
10,000
4539-5500
Contract Svcs
72,000
82,000
79,800
4539-5519
Weed/Pest Abatement
5,000
4539-6410
Capital Improvements
17,000
4539-4980
Admin & Inspection
9,042
4539-7200
Insurance Exp.
6,200
6,200
4915-9250
Transfer out-CIP
50,000
2550
Reserves
173,788
175,513
84.119
TOTAL
$313,480
$345,459
$273,819
Note Capital Projects Include:
42 Summitridge Mini Park
20,000
43 Summitridge Mini Park
30.000
50,000
SECTION 4. DIAGRAM FOR DISTRICT
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 39
consists of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the
Assessment Diagram labeled "Exhibit A-2" attached hereto.
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT
The landscape and lighting improvements have been
established and are maintained for the safety and enjoyment of all the properties
within the assessment district boundaries, and all parcels with the district
benefit from the improvements.
The amount estimated to be assessed upon the lands within
the district and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the
district is shown in the table below.
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Assessment No. of Assessment
Requirements Parcels Per Parcel
$ 98,306 / 796 = $123.50*
1990-91 1991-92
Assessment Assessment
Per Parcel Per Parcel Difference
$130.00 $123.50 ($6.50)
*Estimated Assessment rounded to $124.
Respectfully sub itted,
Will am E. Bennett
Assessment Engineer
IC.e v i s e -d
1991 - 1992
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for the City of Diamond Bar
Landscaping Assessment District No. 39
Prepared By:
ASL Consultants, Inc.
55 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 200
Arcadia, California 91006
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared under the authority and direction
of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar pursuant to their Resolution No.
and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
SECTION 2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for the improvements within
the district are on file in the City Hall of the City of Diamond Bar and are
available for public inspection. Reference is hereby made to said plans and
specification for the exact location and nature of the improvements and is hereby
made a part of this report.
SECTION 3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS
The total estimated costs for the maintenance of
improvements within the district are as follows:
REVENUE:
1991-92
1990-91 1990-91 City Mgr
Adopted Budget Ad!. Budget Recommended
2550 Approp. Fund Balance $210,000 $241,979 $175,513
3015 Prop. Tx -Sp Assessment 103,480 103,480 98,306
3810 Interest Revenue 12,000
TOTAL 313,480 345,459 273,819
APPROPRIATIONS:
4539-0010
Salaries
9,650
24,600
4539-0030
Part Time Wages
635
4539-0080
Benefits
1,352
3,700
4539-0083
Wkr's Comp Exp.
328
1,000
4539-0085
Medicare Exp.
151
400
4539-0090
Cafeteria Benefits
980
3,500
4539-2126
Utilities
45,850
45,850
43,200
4539-2210
Maint-Grounds & Bldg.
2,800
2,800
2,800
4539-4000
Professional Svcs
10,000
10,000
2,500
4539-5400
Contract Svcs
10,000
4539-5500
Contract Svcs
72,000
82,000
79,800
4539-5519
Weed/Pest Abatement
5,000
4539-6410
Capital Improvements
17,000
4539-4980
Admin & Inspection
9,042
4539-7200
Insurance Exp.
6,200
6,200
4915-9250
Transfer out-CIP
50,000
2550
Reserves
173,788
175.513
84.119
TOTAL
$313,480
$345,459
$273,819
Note Capital
Projects Include:
42 Summitridge Mini Park
20,000
43 Summitridge Mini Park
30,000
50,000
SECTION 4. DIAGRAM FOR DISTRICT
Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 consists of all
assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the Assessment Diagram
labeled "Exhibit A-2" attached hereto.
SECTION 5. ,ASSESSMENT
The landscape improvements have been established and are
maintained for the safety and enjoyment of all the properties within the
assessment district boundaries, and all parcels with the district benefit from
the improvements.
The amount estimated to be assessed upon the sands within
the district and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the
district is shown in the table below.
Estimated
Estimated
Assessment
No. of
Reayj rements
Parcels
$ 98,306
1,292
1990-91
1991-92
AssessmeOt
Assessment
Per Parol
Per _Parcel
$130
$77
Respectfully su muted,
,///"
William E. Bennett:
Assessment Engineer
Estimated
Assessment
Per Parcel
$77
I?ifference
AGENDA NO. 4 ':
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Managerr
FROM: Sid Mousavi, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Landscape Assessment District 41
on April 16, 1991, the City Council directed staff to prepare the Engineer's
Report for the Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Landscaping Assessment District No. 41.
DISCUSSION
The attached Engineer's Report for the City's Landscaping District No.,41, which
is prepared pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
(Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of
California), includes authority for the report, plans and specifications,
estimated costs of improvements, a diagram for the districts, and assessments.
Included herewith are resolutions of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
approving the Engineer's Report and fixing and giving notice of a time and place
for a public hearing on the levy of an assessment on said District for Fiscal Year
1991-1992.
(Narrative continued on the next page)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Andrew V. Arczynski
City Attorney
Terrence L. Belanger v
Assistant City Manager
The amount assessed upon the lands within the District for Fiscal Year 1990-1991
was $280 per parcel. However, the amount estimated to be assessed for Fiscal Year
1991-1992 is reduced to $2.66.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions and set the
time and place for a hearing before the Council on the question of the levy of the
proposed assessment on assessable lots within District 41, and direct the City
Clerk to advertise the hearing.
1991 - 1992
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for the City of Diamond Bar
Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 41
Prepared By:
ASL Consultants, Inc.
55 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 200
Arcadia, California 91006
SECTION 4. DIAGRAM FOR DISTRICT
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 41
consists of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the
Assessment Diagram labeled "Exhibit A-3" attached hereto.
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT
The landscape and lighting improvements have been
established and are maintained for the safety and enjoyment of all the properties
within the assessment district boundaries, and all parcels with the district
benefit from the improvements.
The amount estimated to be assessed upon the lands within
the district and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the
district is shown in the table below.
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Assessment No. of Assessment
Requirements Parcels Per Parcel
$126,768 / 477 = $265.76*
1990-91 1991-92
Assessment Assessment
Per Parcel Per Parcel Difference
$280.00 $265.76 ($14.24)
* Estimated Assessment rounded to $266.
Respectfully subm'tted,
i liam E. Bennett
Assessment Engineer
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR APPROVING THE REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22623
OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WITH RESPECT TO CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 AND
FIXING AND GIVING NOTICE OF A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT ON SAID DISTRICT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92.
A. Recitals.
(i) Heretofore, City of Diamond Bar Landscaping
Assessment District No. 41 was created pursuant to Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Street and Highways Code §22500, et.
seq.
(ii) The City Engineer has prepared, filed with the City
Clerk and presented to this Council a report relating to said
assessment district pursuant to the provisions of Section 2263 of
the California Streets and Highways Code.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution.
2. The above-described report submitted by the City
Engineer relating to City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment
District No. 41 is hereby approved as filed.
3. This Council hereby declares its intention to levy
and collect assessments during fiscal year 1991-92 pursuant to Park
2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, know as the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," on
that area designated "City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment
District No. 41," an area more particularly described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
4. A general description of the improvements proposed
for the aforementioned district is as follows:
The maintenance and possible future replacement of
lighting, landscaping and any facilities which are appurtenant
thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the
maintenance and servicing thereof, including grading,.
clearing, removal of debris, pruning, fertilization, pest
control, weed control, the installation or construction of
curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. Said
maintenance, servicing, landscaping and related work shall be
within the area of Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 as
described in Exhibit "A."
5. Reference hereby is made to the report of the City
Engineer relating to the said assessment district hereinabove
approved. Said report is on file with the City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar and contains a full and detailed description of the
improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and
contains the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels
of land within City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment District
No. 41 for fiscal year 1991-92. Said proposed assessment per lot
is the amount of $21.00.
6. This Council hereby fixes 7:00 p.m. on June 18, 1991
in the Board Room, Walnut Valley Unified School District, 880 South
Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California, as the time and place for a
hearing before this Council on the question of the levy of the
proposed assessments on assessable lots within City of Diamond Bar
Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 for fiscal year 1991-92 and
hereby gives notice of said hearing.
7. The City Clerk shall:
a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
b. Cause a true and correct copy of this Resolution
to be published pursuant to California Government Code §6061.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of ,
1991.
Mayor
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved
and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar held on day of 1991 by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
Lynda Burgess, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
' ��ii�ll�fio�a■ -- ;��
• .�
■ �;,.�a;
• s_�-
Cr- V% s'ed
1991 - 1992
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for the City of Diamond Bar
Landscaping Assessment District No. 41
Prepared By:
ASL Consultants, Inc.
55 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 200
Arcadia, California 91006
(,, -. i Uk DIAMOND BAR
AGENI) A SCI EDVI.,ING REQUEST
TO: CITY CLEItI: VIA CITY MANAGER
FROM: RnhPrt- -I,_Van _M.LL�
FOR MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991 _
[X] Consent Calendar [ ) Special Presentations
[ ] Public Hearings [ ) Closed Session
[ ] Unfinished Business [ ] Other
[ ] New Business
AGENDA TITLE: Resolution supporting legislative efforts to empower
peace officers to remove unsafe commercial vehicles from streets
and highways.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt resolution.
External Distribution - name and address of applicant or others
to be notified of meeting and decision:
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
AGENDA NO. ,r
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1991 COUNCIL DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SID JALAL MOUSAVI, CITY ENGIN
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1890 TO FLOOD CONTROL
Private Drain No. 1890 was constructed in 1988 as part of the improvements in Tract No. 42533.
Subsequently, the drain was inspected and approved by the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works based upon the satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans.
The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements and is in agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution requesting the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of
Private Drain No. 1890 for future operation, maintenance, repair and improvement.
RKA:knb:311 B:cc-3:dr1890
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT-.-
Amount
MPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number:
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source:
t-i>ry manager
7/24/90
City Attorney
Assistant City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID
DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1890 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF.
WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City has otherwise acquired, the storm
drain improvements and drainage system known as PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1890, described in
Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los
Angeles County Flood Control District any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for
future operations, maintenance, repair and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District entered into an
agreement dated June 20, 1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570,
of the Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles,
whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of Flood
Control facilities to the District; and
WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of the storm
drain improvements and drainage system described in Exhibit A attached hereto from the City
to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for future operation, maintenance, repair and
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the Los Angeles
County Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain
improvements and drainage system described in said Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of
Supervisors of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the City Engineer is directed and
ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents, including deed, to effectuate said
transfer and conveyance, and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said deed
and other instruments and documents. District shall have no obligation or responsibility to
maintain said storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for said drain now
vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way therefore have been conveyed to and
accepted by District.
Reference is hereby made to District Drawings No. 313-F107.1-107.3, the plans and profile
of said storm drain improvements and drainage system on file in the office of the City Engineer
and on file of the Chief Engineer of said District for further data as to the exact location, extent,
and description of said storm drain improvements and drainage system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer and conveyance hereby requested are
subject to each of the warranties described in the Agreement between the City and the District
dated June 20, 1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570, of the
Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles. Such
warranties by the City are incorporated here by this reference.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
day of ,1991.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar held on
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
db-cc3:dr1890.res
day of
1991, by the following
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
EXHIBIT "A"
Private Drain 1890
A reinforced concrete pipe storm drain system and appurtenant structures for Tract No. 42533
filed in Book 1078, pages 41 to 45, inclusive, of Maps, Records of the County of Los Angeles,
generally described as follows:
Lateral "C-1 ":
Commencing from an existing storm drain per P.D. No. 1668, Station 2+10.07, located in an
easement to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain and storm drain
ingress and egress purposes; thence northwesterly in said easement to Estoril Drive; thence
northwesterly in Estoril Drive to a catch basin at Station 2+76.17, a distance of 66 feet, more or
less.
Lateral "H":
Commencing from an existing storm drain per P.D. No. 1668, Station 2+18.94, located in an
easement to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for storm drain and storm drain
ingress and egress purposes; thence southwesterly in said easement to Estoril Drive; thence
southwesterly in Estoril Drive to a catch basin at Station 2+71.00, a distance of 52 feet, more or
less.
All as shown on District Drawing Nos. 313-F107.1 through 313-F107.3.
TO: Carl Blum
Land Development Division
FROM: R. E. Etcheverry
Construction Division
ATTENTION: Rod Kubomoto
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - PRIVATE DRAIN
TR/1!ff NUMBER PROJECT ,0, /
6 5�Q
JOE NUMBER L0//63 i Z LOCATION /I/jnh fP ,,Ci
Final Inspection of the above -captioned Private Drain has been made. The work
has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, and is
ready for formal acceptance.
Inspection Date ID_ 06.87 BY d . a. G�rrens,� , Underground Inspection Section
Approval Date g — 2• By �,1�, Loyr�asY, Head Construction Inspector
REMARKS
This Job Number should be closed.
Recommend this Job be accepted for public use..4'
ervisor, r ct onstruction ov
Approved ByA4���`� dr
a ivision ns ec .on
cc: Hdgtrs/Permit Office/Road Element
Head C nstruction Inspector
File/
CR:sI/COMP-PD
Revised 8/87
AGENDA NO. /,--'
--------------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 28, 19917 COUNCIL DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SID JALAL MOUSAVI, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2145 TO FLOOD CONTROL
Private Drain No. 2145 was constructed in 1990 as part of the improvements in Tract No. 42564.
Subsequently, the drain was inspected and approved by the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works based upon the satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans.
The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements and is in agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution requesting the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of
Private Drain No. 2145 for future operation, maintenance, repair and improvement.
RKkW L:nb:3126:cc-3:dr2145
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
Z-- - -I'd GG4 (i4LL-t---------------------- �.� vrw► _v� (/� _ ri�w
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manage
7/24/90
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID
DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2145 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF.
WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City has otherwise acquired, the storm
drain improvements and drainage system known as PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 2145, described in
Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los
Angeles County Flood Control District any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for
future operations, maintenance, repair and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District entered into an
agreement dated June 20,1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570,
of the Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles,
whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of Flood
Control facilities to the District; and
WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of the storm
drain improvements and drainage system described in Exhibit A attached hereto from the City
to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for future operation, maintenance, repair and
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the Los Angeles
County Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain
improvements and drainage system described in said Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of
Supervisors of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the City Engineer is directed and
ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents, including deed, to effectuate said
transfer and conveyance, and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said deed
and other instruments and documents. District shall have no obligation or responsibility to
maintain said storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for said drain now
vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way therefore have been conveyed to and
accepted by District.
Reference is hereby made to District Drawings No. 301-F83.1-83.7, the plans and profile
of said storm drain improvements and drainage system on file in the office of the City Engineer
and on file of the Chief Engineer of said District for further data as to the exact location, extent,
and description of said storm drain improvements and drainage system.
BE rT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer and conveyance hereby requested are
subject to each of the warranties described in the Agreement between the City and the District
dated June 20, 1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570, of the
Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles. Such
warranties by the City are incorporated here by this reference.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
day of ,1991.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1991, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
db-cc4:dr2145.res
EXHIBIT "A"
Private Drain 2145
A reinforced concrete pipe storm drain system and appurtenant structures for Tract No. 42564
filed in Book 1093, pages 12 to 18, and Tract No. 35576, filed in Book 1093, pages 21 to 24,
inclusive, of Maps, Records of the County of Los Angeles, generally described as follows:
Line "A":
Commencing from an outlet structure, 7+12.00, located in an easement to the County of Los
Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and storm drain ingress and egress purposes which
lies westerly of Leyland Drive and southerly of Benfield Place; thence easterly in said easement
to Leyland Drive; thence northerly in Leyland Drive to join an existing storm drain per P.D No.
1862, Station 21+34.40, a distance of 1,422 feet, more or less.
Laterals "A-11", "A-2", "A-311, "A-4", "A-511, "A-6" and "A-7":
Connector pipes from Line "A" to catch basins.
Line "B":
Commencing from a manhole structure per Line "A", Station 12+07.10 (Station 0+13.00, Line "B"),
located in an easement to the County of Los Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and
storm drain ingress and egress purposes; thence southeasterly in said easement to Leyland
Drive; thence southeasterly in Leyland Drive to join an existing storm drain per P.D. 1862, Station
1 +26.60, a distance of 114 feet, more or less.
Line "C":
Commencing from a junction structure per Line "A", Station 20+60.00 (Station 1 +08.75, Line "C"),
located in Leyland Drive at Newbury Way; thence northwesterly in Leyland Drive to an easement
to the County of Los Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and storm drain ingress and
egress purposes that lies within Lot 18 of said tract; thence westerly in said easement to an inlet
structure, Station 2+98.24, a distance of 189 feet, more or less.
Lateral "C-1 ":
Connector pipe from Line "C" to a catch basin.
Line "G':
Commencing from an existing storm drain, P.D. 1862, Station 1+60.00, located in Newbury Way
easterly of Leyland Drive; thence southerly in Newbury Way to an easement to the County of Los
Angeles for storm drain and storm drain ingress and egress purposes; thence easterly in said
easement to an inlet structure, Station 6+75.00, a distance of 515 feet, more or less.
Laterals "G-1" and "G-2":
Connector pipes from Line "G" to catch basins.
Laterals "E-1" and "E-2":
Connector pipes from existing storm drain, P.D. 1862, to catch basins.
All as shown on District Drawing Nos. 301-F83.1 through 301-F83.7.
STORM ORAlm
w \ PER P.D. No../862
o NfH'B U qy WAY
�{ a
Q v
V
V
1( ,4AG'E.
STORM O,PA/N
IBO Z_
CITY' OF' DIAMOND. BAR
-PRIVATE DRAIN NO. Zl¢S
TRACT NO. 46¢
DATE :' 2�
Date :2-//R- 5n
TO: N. C. Datwyler
Land Development Division
FROM: Kahler V. Russell
Construction Division
ATTENTION: Rod Kubcmoto
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - PRIVATE DRAIN
TR/017 NUMBER Z S( ¢. _ S S7G PROJECT
JOB NUMBER Z- ¢-2�'�¢�/ LOCATION
Final Inspection of the above -captioned Private Drain has been made. The work
has been corTleted in accordance with the plans and specifications, and is
ready for formal acceptance.
Inspection Date 7-L4- ?4 By ��� e,14 S uT\l. , Underground Inspection Section
Approval Date `j -/g - �n By Head Construction Inspector
REMARKS D ar
This Job Number has been closed.
Recommend this Job be accepted for public use.
rvisor, Contract Construction
Approved By
H sion Inspection
cc: Hdgtrs/Permit Office/Road Element
Head Construction Inspector
-,file
CR:sl/COMP-PD
Revised 5/90
r'
AGENDA NO.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 29, 1991 COUNCIL DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SID JALAL MOUSAVI, CITY ENGINEE�r—
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1862 TO FLOOD CONTROL
Private Drain No. 1862 was constructed in 1990 as part of the improvements in Tract No. 31850.
Subsequently, the drain was inspected and approved by the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works based upon the satisfactory completion of the improvements per approved
plans.
The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements and is in agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution requesting the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of
Private Drain No. 1862 for future operation, maintenance, repair and improvement.
RKA:�I L: nb:3127:cc•3:dr1882
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
REV D BY: ,
Gt
--- -- ------------------------------ '__
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
7/24/90
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID
DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1862 IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF.
WHEREAS, there have been dedicated to, or the City has otherwise acquired, the storm
drain improvements and drainage system known as PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1862, described in
Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to transfer and convey to the Los
Angeles County Flood Control District any storm drain improvements and drainage systems for
future operations, maintenance, repair and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District entered into an
agreement dated June 20,1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570,
of the Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles,
whereby the City made certain warranties about its future transfers and conveyances of Flood
Control facilities to the District; and
WHEREAS, the best public interest will be served by transfer and conveyance of the storm
drain improvements and drainage system described in Exhibit A attached hereto from the City
to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for future operation, maintenance, repair and
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City does hereby request the Los Angeles
County Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of the storm drain
improvements and drainage system described in said Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, subject to the acceptance thereof of the Board of
Supervisors of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the City Engineer is directed and
ordered to prepare all necessary instruments and documents, including deed, to effectuate said
transfer and conveyance, and that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute said deed
and other instruments and documents. District shall have no obligation or responsibility to
maintain said storm drain, improvements, and drainage until all rights of way for said drain now
vested in the City and all other necessary rights of way therefore have been conveyed to and
accepted by District.
Reference is hereby made to District Drawings No. 301-F73.1 -73.13, the plans and profile
of said storm drain improvements and drainage system on file in the office of the City Engineer
and on file of the Chief Engineer of said District for further data as to the exact location, extent,
and description of said storm drain improvements and drainage system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer and conveyance hereby requested are
subject to each of the warranties described in the Agreement between the City and the District
dated June 20, 1989, and recorded March 20, 1990, as Document Number 90-545570, of the
Official Records in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Los Angeles. Such
warranties by the City are incorporated here by this reference.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
day of ,1991.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar held on
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
db-cc3:dr1862.res
day of , 1991, by the following
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
EXHIBIT "A"
Private Drain 1862
A reinforced concrete pipe storm drain system and appurtenant structures for Tract No. 31850
filed in Book 1046, pages 30 to 34, inclusive, of Maps, Records of the County of Los Angeles,
generally described as follows:
Line "A":
Commencing from an outlet structure, Station 7+58.00, located in an easement to the County
of Los Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and storm drain ingress and egress purposes,
which lies south of Highcrest Drive and westerly of Leyland Drive; thence northeasterly in said
easement to Leyland Drive; thence northerly in Leyland Drive to join existing storm drain per P.D.
No. 1820 Unit I, Station 29+40.00, a distance of 2,182 feet, more or less.
Lateral "A-2":
Connector pipe from Line "A" to a catch basin.
Line "B":
Commencing from an existing storm drain per P.D. No. 2145, Station 8+40.00, located in Leyland
Drive, south of Highcrest Drive; thence southerly in Leyland Drive to an easement to the County
of Los Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and storm drain ingress and egress
purposes; thence southeasterly in said easement to an inlet structure, Station 20+20.00, a
distance of 1,180 feet, more or less.
Line "D":
A connector pipe from Line "B" to an inlet structure.
Line "E":
Commencing from a manhole structure per Line "A" Station 20+60.00 (Station 6+78.66, Line "E"),
located in Leyland Drive, south of Highcrest Drive; thence easterly in Leyland Drive to a 15 foot -
wide easement to the County of Los Angeles for storm drain and appurtenances and storm drain
ingress and egress purposes; thence easterly in said easement to join existing storm drain per
P.D. No. 1812 Unit II, Station 11 +00.33, a distance of 422 feet, more or less.
Line "F":
A connector pipe from Line "A" to an inlet structure.
Line "G":
A connector pipe from Line "E" to an inlet structure.
All as shown on District Drawing Nos. 301-F73.1 through 301-F73.13.
II
4ly-
•.n n �^
rcN Z 1XIC
O �
/L /NE
i
v sTvp,MoeA/N
CITY' OF' DIAMOND BAR
1-114 TSN L/uE'
��EE fJeo✓�)
..PRIVATE DRAIN NO. /B6Q.
TRACT NO.:3/854
DATE:' oft,
i
Date <31 -/
TO: N. C. Datwyler
Land Development Division
FROM: Kahler V. Russell
Construction Division
ATTENTION: Rod Kubomoto
NOTICE OF COMPLETION - PRIVATE DRAIN
TR/.Pg-- WMBER , l8 s'�� PROJOCT
JOB NUMBER G /�j' $'Qu LOCATION /�2�� ti ,v,2�� e /c/
Final Inspection of the above -captioned Private Drain has been made. The work
has been ccap,leted in accordance with the plans and specifications, and is
ready for formal acceptance.
Inspection Date 7 Z4- YD By ��.u�c� _5-Ury', Underground'Inspection section
Approval Date 90 ByHead Construction Inspector
14-1
REMARKS /rl �i � n r� . �/�7 rri e) ✓I Kz ca7Y"
This Job Number has been closed.
Reccmmend this Job be accepted for public use.
pervi , Contract Construction
cc: Hdgtrs/Permit Office/Road Element
dead Construction Inspector
✓File
CR:sl/COMP-PD
Revised 5/90
X "-
AGENDA NO.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 24, 1991 COUNCIL DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SID JALAL MOUSAVI, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1668 UNIT II TO FLOOD CONTROL
Private Drain No. 1668 Unit II was constructed in 1990 as part of the improvements in Tract No.
41305. Subsequently, the drain was inspected and approved by the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works based upon the satisfactory completion of the improvements per
approved plans.
The City Engineer has reviewed the improvements and is in agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution requesting the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works Flood Control District to accept the transfer and conveyance of
Private Drain No. 1668 Unit II for future operation, maintenance, repair and improvement.
F1KAa: nb:3122:cc-3:dr1888-2.rpt
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
;REV D BY------- --------
Robert
-- Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
7/24/90
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
----------------------
Andrew V. Arczynski
City Attorney
Terrence L. Belang
Assistant City Manager
SUTROa
since 1858
201 California Street San Francisco, California 94111-5096 415-445-8500
May 24, 1991
Mr. Bob Van Nort
City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copely Drive
Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
Dear Bob:
Attached please find the resolutions engaging Jones Hall Hill & White as bond
counsel on the IRAN and Sutro & Co. as financial advisor.
Cordially,
Ray Meador
Vice President
Public Finance
RM/js
Enclosures
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20
ORAL REPORT TO BE GIVEN
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21
ORAL REPORT TO BE GIVEN
AGENDA NO. ✓[:
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
----------------------------------------------
DATE: May 29, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Councilt
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Charles Janiel, Director of Parks and Maintenance
SUBJECT: Award of Maintenance Contract For Diamond Bar Community Parks
ISSUE
Verify references of Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., lowest responsive
bidder for landscape maintenance of Diamond Bar community parks.
Award contract for landscape maintenance of Diamond Bar community parks to the
lowest responsive bidder, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. in the amount
of $97,932 per year.
BACKGROUND
At the May 21, 1991 City Council meeting staff recommended that the landscape
maintenance contract for the Diamond Bar community parks be awarded to the lowest
responsive bidder, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, in the amount of $97,932
per year. At that time the City Council directed staff to do a more extensive
reference check. Attached is a matrix of references and various responses.
Additionally, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises provided staff with information
regarding its ability and willingness to provide documentation for recycling of
green waste. Mariposa is presently separating refuse, and providing it for fiber
fuel, mulches and soil amendments, and can provide the City of Diamond Bar with
any needed documentation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested
Budgeted Amount
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
0
97,932 per year
General Fund
(Narrative continued on the next page)
v
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
Level or
irrigation
Emergency
xesponse
uveraii
now
service
Practices
Response
to Request
Long
G.A. County
Good
Good
Good
Good
Very Good
4 yrs.
%lta Dena
Parks
Chino Hills
Very
Good
Good
Good
Very
2 yrs.
Good
Responsive
L.A. County
Good
Excellent
Very
Very
South Whittier
Good
Responsive
Very Good
5 yrs.
Parks
L.A. County
Descanso
H A V E
N O T R E
T U R N E
D C A L
L
3ardens
L.A. Memorial
Good
N/A
Quick
Good
Best
N/A
Coliseum
Contractor
They've
had
City Of
Excellent
Very
La Canada
Cooperative
Good
Timely
Very Good
4 yrs
Rancho
Excellent
Good
N/A
Excellent
Recommend
2 yrs.
Cucamongo
Slendora
Great
Right
Immediate
Do Well
Best
9 yrs.
on it
Rosemead
Outstanding
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Best
Around
4 yrs.
Baldwin
Excllent
Good
Good
Excellent
Fine
9 yrs.
Park
AGENDA NO.:2 . _
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
------------------------------------------------ - -
DATE: May 30, 1991 MEETING DATE: June, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Ci
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Charles Janiel Director of Parks and
SUBJECT: Community Information Signage
ISSUE:
To develop a means of advertising and promoting community and service organization
events to the public.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission that the City
Council consider the installation of a community message sign with movable letters
and numbers to promote community and service organization events. it also is
recommended that the design and construction be done in conjunction with the City
entrance signs, which are presently being conceived through the entry sign
contest. The Commission would suggest that the message sign be of somewhat
different design than the entry signs, to be more easily distinguished. Attached
for your review is a sketch submitted by Commissioner Meyer as a concept. The
Commission would also recommend that the sign be located on the North-West corner
of the intersection of Golden Springs and Grand. It is believed that right-of-way
negotiations could be negotiated with the County. Should this project be done in
conjunction with the street improvements at the intersection, it may be
incorporated in the design.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ 30,000
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue
10:
------------
Robert L. Van
City Manager
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
• General Fund
----------------------
Nort Andrew V. Arczynski
City Attorney
Terrence Belanger
Assistant City Manager
Community Information Signage
May 30, 1991
Page 2
For some time, the Parks and Recreation Commission has desired a means of
advertising community events and providing a means for community service groups
get the word out to the community on their special events.
The Commission has reviewed several options in its search to meet this community
need. Consideration was given to visibility, initial costs, on-going costs,
convenience of display, aesthetics and effectiveness in reaching the community.
Option 1 - Street Spanning Banner
This was the original concept that got the ball rolling in the search to find an
effective means of communicating with the community. The Commission acknowledged
that an over the street banner would indeed get the message out, particularly if
located in strategic locations. The downside to this concept is the cost of the
initial pole installation, the high cost of producing a banner, the cost of
installation and removal of the banner (contractor would be required due to
limited city resources) and the aesthetics of such display.
Option 2 - vertical Banners on Street Lights
Also presented to the Commission was the vertical style banner to be mounted on
street light poles. These type of banners can be displayed in multiple locations
and are relatively inexpensive. Additionally, once the hardware is in place
seasonal decorations can be used. The disadvantages of this type of banner
includes limited space for wording, and a "carnival" type of appearance and the
number needed to saturate an area. Although these type are much less expensive
than a large over the street type banner, the purchase and installation of a
number of them quickly adds up. Again, contract labor is needed for installation
and removal.
Option 3 - Community Message Board
A third idea was proposed by Commissioner Meyer. It was proposed that a community
message board be developed. It was noted by the Commission that this idea would
also be a large initial investment, but on-going costs would be minimal. The
thought behind this idea was to provide a tasteful yet useful means of promoting
community events, with movable letters that would not be costly at each use.
The concept suggested is estimated to cost approximately $30,000 to construct.
Of course the cost could change based on the final design. On going cost would
include staff time to change messages and maintenance costs, which will be
directly related to construction materials.
�� �_
�_
/�/
i`' �'�
AGENDA NO. �
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 30, 1991 MEETING DATE: June 4, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Charles Janiel Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Jaycees Request to Place a Recognition Plaque at City Hall
BACKGROUND:
The Diamond Bar Jaycees approached the Parks and Recreation Commission with a
proposal to donate a plaque to the City, upon which the names of those who have
contributed to making Diamond Bar a better place to live can be inscribed.
The Commission felt this was an admirable and worthy service and one that the
Commission would be willing to support. The Commission formed a subcommittee to
review the request.
The subcommittee recognizes that the City Hall offices are leased and has
insufficient space which could be used to accommodate the needs of the Jaycees and
other service clubs, the City Council may not wish to authorize the display of the
Jaycees' plaque without providing the same opportunity to other service clubs.
RECOMMENDATION•
The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends the following action:
SHORT TERM
1. As a short term answer to the Jaycees request, it is recommended that the
City Council allow the plaque to be temporarily placed at City Hall
contingent upon the following:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested
Budgeted Amount
in Account Number:
Deficit:
Revenue Source:
0
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
(Narrative continued an next page if necessary)
$ To be determined.
ice Organizations/General Fund
------ - -- - --------- - - - --------
Andrew
-------Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence Belanger
City Attorney Assistant City Manager
Jaycees Request
May 30, 1991
Page 2
A. The Jaycees shall present the concept of a recognition plaque to all
service clubs and request that they submit a joint and coordinated
program to fund the acquisition of a public display case, which will be
donated to the City and will be located at City Hall; and
B. A portion of the display case will be made available to service clubs
to display items of interest. The service clubs shall provide a
schedule acceptable to the City Council for the use of the designated
portion of the public display case.
LONG TERM
1. As a long range approach to creating a memorial, the Parks and Recreation
Commission recommends to the City Council that a budget be created for the
design of a permanent memorial. The City budget amount would match the
service clubs amount.
2. The location, design and policy concerning the use of the memorial and the
names which would be on the memorial shall be established and controlled by
the Diamond Bar City Council.
3. At the direction of the City Council the Parks and Recreation Commission
will appoint a subcommittee to work on the details that would ultimately
lead to the design and construction of such a memorial.