Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/16/1991
Incorporated April 18, 1989 City of Diamond Bar, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Mayor - John A. Forbing Mayor Pro Tem - Jay C. Kim Councilwoman - Phyllis Papen Councilman - Gary H. Werner Councilman - Donald C. Nardella City Council Chambers are located at: Walnut Valley Unified School District Board Room 880 South Lemon Avenue Please refrain from smoking, seating or drinking in the Council Chambers, MEETING DATE: APRIL 16, 1991 MEETING TIME: CLOSED SESSION 5:30 p.m. REGULAR SESSION 6:00 p.m. Robert L. Van Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney Lynda Burgess City Clerk Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item referred to on this agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding any agenda item contact the City Clerk at (714) 860-2489 during business hours. City of Diamond Bar uses RECYCLED paper and encourages you to do the same. THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL MEETING TAPES WILL BE BLACKED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION. CLOSED SESSION 5:30 P.M. Personnel Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6 Property Acquisition Govt. Code Sec. 54956.8 Next Resolution No. 91-18 Next Ordinance No. 2(1991) CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Forbing ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN NARDELLA, PAPEN, WERNER MAYOR PRO TEM KIM, MAYOR FORBING COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. 1. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS A. Parks & Recreation Commission - April 18, 1991 - 7:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. B. Planning Commission - April 22, 1991 - 6:30 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. C. Budget Study Session - May 2, 1991 - 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. - Public input encouraged. D. City Council Meeting - May 7, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 APRIL 16, 1991 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - (A) Regular Meeting of March 19, 1991, (B) Special Meeting of March 29, 1991 and (C) Regular Meeting of April 2, 1991. 3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated April 16, 1991 in the amount of $312,041.49. 4. A) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. B) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 DURING FISCAL. YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER`S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. C) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. Pursuant to provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, funding is provided for maintenance of landscaped open spaces located therein. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolutions and authorize staff to prepare the reports. 5. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES - Claims for Damages filed by (A) Marisa Sage on March 21, 1991 and (B) Neil Dungca on March 26, 1991. Recommended Action: Deny Claims. 6. AMENDED FOOTHILL TRANSIT DISTRICT JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND DELEGATE APPOINTMENT - The City has been working with the Foothill Transit District since Incorporation to amending the existing Joint Powers Authority to include Diamond Bar as a member. The District has now prepared the necessary documents for City approval of the amended Joint Powers Authority Agreement; approval of membership in the Authority and appointment of a delegate and alternate. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 APRIL 16, 1991 Recommended Action: 1) Approve amendment to the Foothill Transit District Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with member cities; 2) approve membership in the Joint Powers Authority and 3) designate Councilwoman Papen as delegate and Councilman Werner as alternate. 7. RECREATION CONTRACT - At its February 19, 1991 meeting, the Council directed staff to negotiate an agreement for recreation services with the City of Brea. Staff has concluded negotiations with Brea staff to provide recreation programs for the Fiscal Year 1991-92, at approximately the same net cost as the Fiscal Year 1990- 91 recreation program, which was $182,000. Recommended Action: Authorize execution of contract with City of Brea for FY91-92 to provide Recreation Services in the amount of $283,411; and, allocate $6,700 from the General Fund Reserve to fund the FY91 payments, under the contract. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION A (LOCAL RETURN TRANSIT FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA GENERAL FUNDS: At the meeting of March 19, 1991, Council authorized the exchange of $500,000 of the City's uncommitted Proposition "A" Funds with the City of Commerce's General Fund monies. The proposed exchange rate was $0.60 in General Fund for $1.00 in Prop. A Funds. The exchange with the City of Commerce did not take place as anticipated, however, staff has been able to negotiate the exchange of $600,000 of the City's Prop "A" Funds in return for the City of Santa Clarita General Fund monies. The negotiated rate is $0.65 in General Fund for $1.00 in Prop "A" Funds. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX authorizing and approving the exchange of Proposition A (Local Return Transit Funds) for the City of Santa Clarita General Funds; and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary document in order to exchange $600,000 of the City's Prop "A" Funds for $390,000 of General Fund monies. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - Proclamations, certificates, etc. 9. PRESENTATION - Presentation by Mr. Ed Biederman, General Manager of the Walnut Valley Water District. 10. CITY TILE - Presentation of Tile to Eugene T. Domeno, Principal of Neil Armstrong Elementary School for receiving the 1991 "Principals of Leadership" award. 11. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of April 22 - 26, 1991 as "BLUE RIBBON WEER." CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 APRIL 16, 1991 12. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the month of May, 1991 as "WATER AWARENESS MONTH." 13. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of May 5 - 11, 1991 as "BE RIND TO ANIMALS WEER." 14. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of May 6 - 12, 1991 as "PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK." 15. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of April 15-21, 1991 as 11CALIFORNIA RECYCLE WEER." NEW BUSINESS 16. "PARTICIPATING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT" PROGRAM - The Institute for Local Self Government and the League of California Cities are sponsoring an Institute for Teachers to be held in Sacramento, August 12-16, 1991. The aim of the program is to help prepare students to become informed, responsible and involved citizens by providing teachers with materials and strategies for instilling a greater understanding of the foundations and practice of local government in California's future voters. Recommended Action: Approve participation in "Participating In Local Government" Program and allocate an amount "not to exceed" $2,000. 17. APPEAL OF CUP 86-410, located at 1200 S. Brea Canyon Rd - Appeal of Planning Commission's denial of Mr. Stephen Chung's request for an extension of time within which to commence construction of a previously approved project. Recommended Action: Planning Commission recommends denial. Upon conclusion of the report presentation, staff recommends that public testimony be permitted. OLD BUSINESS 18. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - Proposal submitted by the firm of Kotin, Regan and Mouchly for the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy at a cost of $8,500.00 which will incorporate both the educational and public participation processes by piggybacking the program on to an expanded GPAC effort. Recommended Action: Approve the proposal submitted by Kotin, Regan and Mouchly for the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 APRIL 16, 1991 19. BUSINESS LICENSE SERVICES BY COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - On June 6, 1989, the City Council entered into a municipal services agreement which provides for the County to administer specified provisions of the Codes. Also at that time, Council adopted Resolution No. 89-43 which set forth a list of municipal services that the County was to provide under the General Services Agreement. One of the specified Code provisions the County was to administer was Title 7, Business Licenses. Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary regarding the continuation of Title 7 Business License Administration, by the County of Los Angeles, under the General Services Agreement and Resolution No. 89-43. 20. PRESENTATION REGARDING SECURITY AT PARK -N -RIDE LOT - At the request of Councilwoman Papen, Mr. Terry Blank from CalTrans will speak regarding the security program currently in effect at the Park -N -Ride lot. Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary. ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at the next regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL MEETING TAPES WILL BE BLACKED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION. CLOSED SESSION 5:30 P.M. Personnel Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6 Property Acquisition Govt. Code Sec. 54956.8 Next Resolution No. 91-18 Next Ordinance No. 2(1991) CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Forbing ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN NARDELLA, PAPEN, WERNER MAYOR PRO TEM KIM, MAYOR FORBING COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Citv Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. 1. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS A. Parks & Recreation Commission - April 18, 1991 7:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. B. Planning Commission - April 22, 1991 - 6:30 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. C. Budget Study Session - May 2, 1991 - 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. - Public input encouraged. D. City Council Meeting - May 7, 1991 - 6:00 p.m. , W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - (A) Regular Meeting of March 19, 1991, (B) Special Meeting of March 29, 1991 and (C) Regular Meeting of April 2, 1991. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 APRIL 16, 1991 3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated April 16, 1991 in the amount of $312,041.49. 4. A) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. B) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. C) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. Pursuant to provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, funding is provided for maintenance of landscaped open spaces located therein. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolutions and authorize staff to prepare the reports. 5. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES - Claims for Damages filed by (A) Marisa Sage on March 21, 1991 and (B) Neil Dungca on March 26, 1991. Recommended Action: Deny Claims. 6. AMENDED FOOTHILL TRANSIT DISTRICT JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND DELEGATE APPOINTMENT - The City has been working with the Foothill Transit District since Incorporation to amending the existing Joint Powers Authority to include Diamond Bar as a member. The District has now prepared the necessary documents for City approval of the amended Joint Powers Authority Agreement; approval of membership in the Authority and appointment of a delegate and alternate. Recommended Action: 1) Approve amendment to the Foothill Transit District Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with member cities; 2) approve membership in the Joint Powers Authority and 3) designate Councilwoman Papen as delegate and Councilman Werner as alternate. 7. RECREATION CONTRACT - At its February 19, 1991 meeting, the Council directed staff to negotiate an agreement for recreation services with the City of Brea. Staff has concluded negotiations with Brea staff to provide recreation programs for the Fiscal Year 1991-92, at CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 APRIL 16, 1991 approximately the same net cost as the Fiscal Year 1990-91 recreation program, which was $182,000. Recommended Action: Authorize execution of contract with the City of Brea for F-92 to provide Recreation services in the amount of $283,411; and, allocate $6,700 from the General Fund Reserve to fund the F payments, under the contract. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION A (LOCAL RETURN/TRANSIT FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA GENERAL FUNDS: At the meeting of March 19, 1991, Council authorized the exchange of $500,000 of the City's uncommitted Proposition "A" Funds with the City of Commerce's General Fund monies. The proposed exchange rate was $0.60 in General Fund for $1.00 in Prop A Funds. The exchange with the City of Commerce did not take place as anticipated, however, staff has been able to negotiate the exchange of $600,000 of the City's Prop "A" Funds in return for the City of Santa Clarita General Fund monies. The negotiated rate is $0.65 in General Fund for $1.00 in Prop "A" Funds. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX authorizing and approving the exchange of Proposition A (Local Return Transit Funds) for the City of Santa Clarita General Funds; and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary document in order to exchange $600,000 of the City's Prop "A" Funds for $390,000 of General Fund monies. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - Proclamations, certificates, etc. 9. PRESENTATION - Presentation by Mr. Ed Biederman, General Manager of the Walnut Valley Water District. 10. CITY TILE - Presentation of Tile to Eugene T. Domeno, Principal of Neil Armstrong Elementary School for receiving the 1991 "Principals of Leadership" award. 11. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of April 22 - 26, 1991 as "BLUE RIBBON WEEK." 12. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the month of May, 1991 as "WATER AWARENESS MONTH." 13. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of May 5 - 11, 1991 as "BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK." 14. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of May 6 - 12, 1991 "PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK." 15. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of April 15-21, 1991 as "CALIFORNIA RECYCLE WEEK." CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 APRIL 16, 1991 NEW BUSINESS 16. "PARTICIPATING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT" PROGRAM - The Institute for Local Self Government and the League of California Cities are sponsoring an Institute for Teachers to be held in Sacramento, August 12-16, 1991. The aim of the program is to help prepare students to become informed, responsible and involved citizens by providing teachers with materials and strategies for instilling a greater understanding of the foundations and practice of local government in Californians future voters. Recommended Action: Approve participation in "Participating In Local Government" Program and allocate an amount "not to exceed" $2,000. 17. APPEAL OF CUP 96-410, located at 1200 S. Brea Canyon Rd - Appeal of Planning Commission's denial of Mr. Stephen Chung's request for an extension of time within which to commence construction of a previously approved project. Recommended Action: Planning Commission recommends denial. Upon conclusion of the report presentation, staff recommends that public testimony be permitted. NEW BUSINESS 18. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - Proposal submitted by the firm of Kotin, Regan and Mouchly for the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy at a cost of $8,506.00 which will incorporate both the educational and public participation processes by piggybacking the program on to an expanded GPAC effort. Recommended Action: Approve the proposal submitted by Kotin, Regan and Mouchly for the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy. 19. BUSINESS LICENSE SERVICES BY COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - On June 6, 1989, the City Council entered into a municipal services agreement which provides for the County to administer specified provisions of the Codes. Also at that time, Council adopted Resolution No. 89-43 which set forth a list of municipal services that the Council was to provide under the General Services Agreement. One of the specified Code provisions the County was to administer was Title 7, Business Licenses. Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary regarding the continuation of Title 7 Business License Administration, by the County of Los Angeles, under the General Services Agreement and Resolution No. 89-43. 20. PRESENTATION REGARDING SECURITY AT PARK -N -RIDE LOT - At the request of Councilwoman Papen, Mr. Terry Blank from CalTrans will speak regarding the security program currently in effect at CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 APRIL 16, 1991 the Park -N -Ride lot. Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary. ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at the next regular meeting. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL _ REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. P(1Bt(< DATE: XPR« 16 Y TO: City Clerk +1 !� FROM: ADDRESS: % S B GoL �� 6N cf'a'��r S 1�k iv/) %11'° X71 ORGANIZATION: i1%frMoti +� �A�? �� l) FC iA l !a,, SUBJECT: X I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. 6 " Sianature NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR T MARCH 19, 1991 CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance ALLEGIANCE: by Boy Scout Troop 777. ROLL CALL: Mayor Werner, Mayor Pro Tem Forbing, Councilmen Nardella, Papen and Kim. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Director of Planning James DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Mousavi and City Clerk Lynda Burgess. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Nardella announced that an opening existed on the Traffic & Transportation Commission and that parties interested in serving may submit a letter or resume to City Hall. C/Papen stated that she had attended a Senate hearing on reapportionment and elections and submitted written testimony from the City urging that the entire City be included into one jurisdictional boundary in lieu of the current two districts. She further stated that it appears that there will be two districts in the San Gabriel Valley, namely, the East and West. At the request of MPT/Forbing, Council directed the City's delegate to the California Contract Cities to vote for Bea Lapisto from the City of Bradbury for the office of Treasurer when the organization holds its election on March 20, 1991. M/Werner stated that his had a positive influence it had been the same for community. past year as Mayor has on him and that he hoped both the Council and the PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. Clair Harmony complimented M/Werner on the positive results of his leadership. Ms. Brenda Anaya, Field Representative for Assemblyman Paul Horcher, presented M/Werner with a Certificate of Recognition for his past and present dedication to the City. She also presented MPT -Elect Kim and M -Elect Forbing with Certificates of Recognition. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Kim moved, seconded by MPT/Forbing to approve the Consent Calendar with the exclusion of Items 7, 10 and 13. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 2 AYES: COUNCILMEN - Nardella, Papen, Kim, MPT/Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None Schedule Future A. Planning Commission - March 25, 1991 - 7:00 Meetings p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Rm., 880 S. Lemon Ave. B. Parks & Recreation Commission - March 281 1991 - 7:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. C. City Council Meeting - April 2, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. D. 2nd Anniversary Celebration - April 13, 1991 - 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Diamond Bar High School Approval of Approved Budget Study Session Minutes of February Minutes 26, 1991 and Regular Meeting of March 5, 1991. Warrant Register Approved Warrant Register dated March 19, 1991 in the amount of $190,622.27. Parks & Received and filed Parks & Recreation Commission Recreation Minutes of February 14, 1991 and February 28, Comm. Minutes 1991. Planning Comm. Received and filed Planning Commission Minutes Minutes of February 25, 1991. SEATAC Minutes Received and filed SEATAC Minutes of February 4, 1991. Final Map #18722 Approved Final Map No. 18722; authorized the City Country Hills Engineer to execute the map and directed the City Clerk to certify and process it for recordation. I Award of Contract- Awarded contract to Intersection Maintenance Median Reconst. Service and authorized staff to proceed with & Traffic Signal construction. Constrctn - Grand Ave. at Shotgun Ln. Letter of Intent- Approved preparation of a Letter of Intent and Support L.A. Cnty. authorized the Mayor to sign said letter on Sheriff in Bid to behalf of the City. Host 1993 Police Summer Games Pathfinder Approved Agreement with the County of L.A. Bridge Proj. and authorized City Clerk to submit it to City/Cnty. the County for execution. Coop. Agrmnt. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 3 MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: Resolution 91 -XX CM/Van Nort stated that this was being withdrawn Urging Citizens due to the fact that with the recent rains, 30% & Water Users to cutbacks may not have to be implemented. Comply w/Water Regulations Purchase of C/Nardella moved, C/Kim seconded to authorize Computer Sys. expenditure of $800 toward purchase of a computer to Aid in Control system to aid in control of gangs. With the of Gangs for following Roll Call vote, motion carried: Walnut Sheriff AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Nardella, MPT/Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None Resolution 91-12 C/Kim suggested that the City Engineer meet with Authorizing LACTC to discuss a "Demonstration Project" for Exchange of advanced technology. Further, he requested that Prop A (Local matters requiring Council action on expenditure Return Transit of funds not be placed on the Consent Calendar in Funds) for the future. City of Commerce General Funds Following further discussion, C/Kim moved, C/Nardella seconded to adopt Resolution No. 91-12 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION A (LOCAL RETURN TRANSIT FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF COMMERCE GENERAL FUNDS. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Kim, Nardella, Papen, MPT/Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: Certificate of M/Werner and C/Kim presented a Certificate of Appreciation - Appreciation to Mr. & Mrs. John Park, owners of Mr. & Mrs. Diamond Bar Cleaners, for cleaning U.S. Flags John Park without charge. The cleaners is located in the Country Hills Towne Center, 2089 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. Proclamation - Operation Desert Home" Proclamation - "Public Health Week" M/Werner proclaimed support of "Operation Desert Home" and urged all residents to display yellow and U.S. Flags. M/Werner proclaimed April 1 - 7, 1991 as "Public Health Week." MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 4 OLD BUSINESS: 2nd Anniversary Admin. Analyst Kellee Fritzal reported on the Celebration status of the preparations being made for the City's 2nd Anniversary scheduled for April 13, 1991 at Diamond Bar High School. C/Nardella expressed concern regarding the lack of publicity and suggested that advertisements be made over cable television. M/Werner suggested that flyers be given community organizations, such as Rotary, Lions, church groups, etc. In response to Council's questions, Ms. Fritzal advised that Prop A money was to be used for the shuttle service and that emergency kits would be available through the Diamond Bar Improvement Association. Further, the Parks & Recreation Commission had not been actively involved in the planning of the celebration but had been advised of all arrangements. In addition, she reported that $41000 had been budgeted for the event and that contributions received and revenues collected by Alta Ski and Sport for the run/walk will be donated to the City. M/Werner requested that a sample of the shirt be brought to the April 2nd meeting. Contract CE/Mousavi stated that at the March 5, 1991 meet - Engineering ing, staff had requested authorization to award Services Traffic Engineering Services contracts to DKS Associates and to Warren Siecke. Council reviewed the report and requested additional information, specifically in the areas of budget and expendi- tures in Engineering and Public Works. He pointed out that Paragraph 2 of the report regarding the $65,000 allocation should be amended to read $60,000. He recommended that developers be charged in addition to outside funding sources for the traffic engineering and soil engineering services that are needed. Only when traffic studies are requested by City officials would General Fund monies be used. In addition, he requested that Council set a policy direction for staff to follow. M/Werner suggested that the Council consider establishment of a list of available firms for a period of 12 months, on an "as needed" basis, beginning immediately. He further stated that an exclusive agreement had recently been terminated with one engineering company and that he could not MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 5 understand why the two companies being recommended are the only two firms who would be able to satisfy the City's needs. CA/Arczynski stated that the term "exclusive" does not mean that there is a guarantee to either firm that no matter what traffic engineering services are needed, these firms will be used. M/Werner suggested that Council establish policies by which staff can go about procuring services needed for purposes identified. C/Kim suggested that Council approve funding for the remaining fiscal year. Staff could come back with another recommendation in the next fiscal year. C/Nardella asked if there would be anything to prevent staff from finding other qualified firms and signing the same contract with those firms. CA/Arczynski indicated that that was not a problem. Following discussion, M/Werner moved that the matter be tabled and direct staff to follow the procurement policy already in place. Motion died for lack of a second. Following further discussion, C/Papen moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to approve contracts for a period of one year with DKS & Associates and Warren Siecke. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, MPT/Forbing NOES: i COUNCILMEMBERS - Nardella, M/Werner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None Ordinance 8A CA/Arczynski presented for 2nd reading by title (1990) Amending only Ordinance No. 8A (1990) entitled: AN Secs. 3203 & ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 3204, Title 26 DIAMOND BAR AMENDING SECTIONS 3203 AND 3204 OF (Bldg. Code) TITLE 26 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES Pertaining to COUNTY CODE, AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED, PERTAINING Roof Covering TO ROOF COVERING REQUIREMENTS. Requirements MPT/Forbing moved, C/Kim seconded to approve for second reading by title only, waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No 8A (1990). In response to C/Papen's request for staff comments on the effect of this Ordinance, CA/Arczynski replied that the Ordinance would change the minimum requirements for roof coverings MARCH 19, 1991 RECESS: RECONVENE: PUBLIC HEARINGS: Resolution 91-13 Certifying EIR 91-1 & Approving TTM 47722 - West of Derringer Ln. & North of Ridgeline Rd. PAGE 6 within the City. It would also change the definition of acceptable roof coverings with respect to fire hazard areas and would preclude the use of wood roof coverings that don't meet specific requirements of the Fire Code for fire resistance, which basically means no wooden roof coverings. There is also a provision permitting individuals to reroof small areas of their home if they have, for example, a shake roof and a portion is damaged by wind, rain, lightening or fire. The roof could be replaced with the same materials, so long as it does not exceed 25% of the roof. If it goes over 25% in any given year, then the roof would have to be replaced or that portion must be replaced with the appropriate type of roofing materials. The idea is to minimize, to the extent humanly possible, the fire danger that exists because of the winds and dryness. At the request of M/Werner, a representative from the Fire Department stated that the Department looks at wood shake roofs unfavorably as they transmit fire, not impede it. Following discussion, Ordinance No. 8A (1990) was adopted by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Nardella MPT/Forbing, M/Werner None None M/Werner declared a recess at 7:20 p.m. M/Werner reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. M/Werner announced that C/Nardella left the room due to a potential conflict of interest. PD/Destefano reported that the proposed project is for 13 custom single family homes on a 19 -acre site located within "The Country" on Derringer Ln. and that an EIR was required. In October, 1990, the Planning Commission denied the original pro- ject consisting of a 16 -unit subdivision with extensive grading and removal of ten mature oak trees. Shortly thereafter, the Council adopted new interim hillside development standards and this project is the first to embrace the new standards. The Planning Commission reviewed the revised project and recommended approval in late January. Lots will range in size from 1/2 acre to about 3 1/2 acres and the building pads will cover MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 7 1/4 acre to over 1/2 acre. The pads will be developed with customized single family homes from approximately 5,000 to 10,000 sq. ft. Building pads have been placed closer to the street and further away from the slopes. Following a slide presentation and a discussion of the EIR process, PD/DeStefano stated that the Planning Commission and staff recommended adoption of a Resolution approving and certifying the EIR and approval of the tentative tract map with the variety of findings and conditions listed within the report. C/Papen asked about the concerns expressed by a potential neighbor regarding a discrepancy in the lot line. PD/DeStefano explained that the maps indicate a property line that appears to extend into lots 78 and 79 in the northerly portion of the site. The gentlemen expressing concern resides on one of those two lots. Once the final survey has been completed, the property line discrepancy will be resolved. CA/Arczynski indicated that this is the first project to be reviewed which includes a "mitiga- tion monitoring program" condition of approval. State law recently required that the public entity that approves projects not only impose appropriate mitigation measures but establish, through contracts, mitigation monitoring programs at the applicant's expense to insure that those mitiga- tion measures are, in fact, put into effect. M/Werner declared the Public Hearing open. Mr. Frank Piermarini, President of Piermarini Homes, indicated that revisions include the removal of the majority of proposed crib walls, no removal of oak trees, relocation of half the gas line, lowered density from 16 to 13 units, reduced amount of grading leaving more natural terrain untouched and conformity with the new hillside Ordinance recently adopted. In addition, reduction of the length of the street from 1600 to 1400 ft. and creation of a second emergency access road for access by the gas company, fire department, etc. Mr. Jim Paul, 1269 Ahtena Dr., stated that he was against the project due to water rationing. There should be a moratorium on building or issuance of new permits until the shortage is alleviated. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 8 Mr. Bill Cordova, resident of the Country, stated that he had never heard about the proposed project until this meeting. Mr. Pat Brashear, 23497 Coyote Springs Dr., stated that he was against the development. Mr. Piermarini replied that the property is zoned R-1-10,000 (4 lots per acre); the gas line will be controlled by So. Calif Gas and they will take total responsibility for the removal of the line and the landslide areas are to be recompacted. He further stated that he had met with surrounding property owners and the Board of Directors for the Country and was asked if he would annex the property. Mr. Lex Williman, Don Sager & Associates, stated that the gas line is a two -end feed which will enable the Gas Co. to shut it down, perhaps during grading. A soils report has been prepared identi- fying slides in the area and mitigation efforts are being explored to alleviate the possibility of slides. The crib walls that have been retained on the project are there only for access to the site; all others have been removed. Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., also spoke in opposition to the development due to the water shortage. Mr. Williman stated that during the construction phase, the water is regulated by the water district, construction meters are given for development and regulated by the District. Once the homes are built, they will have drought tolerant plants, low flow shower heads and low water use toilets will be installed. Mr. King stated that he had prepared the EIR and that the developer is required by City Code to water the site during grading to keep dust down. He further explained that, in response to M/Werner's question, the use of secondary water for grading purposes would not be a problem; however, it would be up to the County and Regional Health Departments to act on the issue, but it is currently under discussion due to the drought situation. A detailed soils analysis was conducted and 80,000 yards of grading is necessary due to the excavation and recompaction of all the areas in the site that were identified as hazard- ous, whether being built on or not. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 9 With no further testimony offered, M/Werner closed the Public Hearing. C/Papen asked the City Attorney to address the issue of the water shortage, the City's and the Water District's responsibilities in continuing to issue permits, the City's liability regarding the stability of the hills and why the tennis courts were not permitted to have lights. PD/DeStefano stated in respect to the water short- age, the Water District provides permits for the type of project to take place. Whether or not the City wishes to take the issue further, there are broader based issues due to the fact that it could also affect a wide variety of other projects. The use of rain water or reclaimed water, if it is a continued concern of the Council, can be added to the report as one of the conditions. The decision of the Planning Commission regarding the issue of lighting in the tennis courts was due to possible light spillage onto adjacent homes. CA/Arczynski stated that the real issue is the City's authority to decline permits or deny projects based upon factors that are beyond its control. The Water District, or the environ- mental process has, to this point said that the project can be served. For the City to say it is not going issue permits or approve the map due to concern about water would be usurping the powers of the Water Board. The City does have authority, however, to require the use of low flow water devices. With respect to slope liability, either during or after construction, it is the devel- oper's problem and/or the property owner's. I C/Kim commended staff and the Planning Commission on their work on this project --especially in the areas of density control and preserving oak trees. He indicated that he was concerned over the "shift flow" situation, the outlay of the cul-de-sac, as there should be some protection in the event of a driver's failure to maneuver. He recommended that staff look into the usage of reclaimed water and possible negotiations with the Golf Course to share reclaimed water. Following discussion, CA/Arczynski stated that the following changes would be made to the conditions: Item 4 would change from "building" to "grading permits"; a sentence would be added at the end of Item 13 to read "to the extent permitted by appropriate health authorities, reclaimed water, as available, shall be used for all grading MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 10 activities"; Item 15, 4th line, would be amended to read "or annexation to The Country Homeowners Association"; deletion of Item 23; Item 25 would be changed from "Crib walls may be allowed if all reasonable..." to "Crib walls may be allowed adjacent to Lots 4 and 5 if all reasonable..." Mr. Piermarini asked for clarification of Item 13. CA/Arczynski stated that the Health Department would have to approve the use of reclaimed water and if it is available, reclaimed water would have to be used for all grading activities. Mr. Piermarini indicated that he agreed with all requests made by Council. C/Papen moved, C/Kim seconded to adopt Resolution No. 91-13, as amended, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 91-1 AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47722 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THIRTEEN LOT SINGLE FAMILY UNIT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A NINETEEN ACRE SITE, ZONED BOTH R-1-1-,000 AND R-1-40,000 AND LOCATED WEST OF DERRINGER LANE, NORTH OF RIDGELINE ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Kim, Papen, MPT/ Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS - Nardella SWEARING-IN OF NEW MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: M/Werner administered the Oath of Office to Mayor - Elect John Forbing effective April 1, 1991. M/Forbing administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Pro Tem -Elect Jay C. Kim effective April 1, 1991. M/Forbing then presented C/Werner with a gavel symbolic of his year has Mayor. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd.) Amendment to Ordinance 15A (199) Re Quasi -Public Uses Within C -M Zones Mr. Irwin Kaplan, City Planner, reported on a conditional use procedure whereby churches would be permitted in C -M Zones but that the Interim Ordinance currently prohibits such uses. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council consider permitting such uses through issuance of MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 11 a Conditional Use Permit. Virtually all churches are currently located in residential zones, which means that churches in the C -M Zone would be a departure from existing development patterns. At the meeting of February 11, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended, approval of an amendment tc the Interim Ordinance for C -M zones in which institutional uses would be permitted by CUP secured by a development agreement or, if appro- priate, by a development agreement without the use of a CUP, which defines specific conditions of development such as the location of the institu- tional use on the parcel, types and intensity of use and an appropriate level of fees and/or charges to offset or compensate the City for revenue opportunities foreclosed as a result of development of commercial property for institu- tional use. In determining such fees or charges, the City would take into account amenities, services or improvements provided by the institu- tional use which would be of benefit to the community. To accomplish this, it was suggested that a fiscal impact analysis be conducted which would begin to establish the framework for discussion as to what the values would be to the community. That fiscal impact analysis would take into consideration the benefits that would be credited in making the calculations. He Also suggested that institutions be more broadly defined (quasi -public use, use operated by private non-profit, educational, religious, recreational, charitable or medical institutions such as having the purpose primarily of serving the general public and including uses such as churches, private schools, and universities, community, youth and senior citizen recreational facilities, private hospitals and the like). The following additional regulations were suggested: quasi - public uses in the C -M zone shall be compli- mentary with and subordinate in size, scale and intensity to its adjacent existing or potential commercial development. This criteria is designed to retain the primary use of C -M zones for commercial purposes. Further, the Commission recommended a program for the provision of amenities, services and improvements and/or fee structures which establishes the value of both capital improvements and/or annual charges as may be deemed reasonable and appropriate and final action on the Commission's recommendation would be incorporated into a development agreement. C/Papen asked what the fiscal impact would be as a result of removal of a particular property from a C -M Zone. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 12 Mr. Kaplan stated that a fiscal impact analysis would look at the type of development, charac- teristics of the area which might be anticipated and evaluate that versus the type of development of the quasi -public use which could take place in the area. It would also look at the proposals specifically for the quasi -public use and deter- mine what types of amenities or benefits might accrue to the community which would become the basis for the fiscal impact analysis. PD/DeStefano stated that the numbers run were based upon a conceptual project that could occur based on the present zoning on the 28 acres located at Grand and Golden Springs, which is the focus of the church use in the C -M zone. If the 28 acres were brought down to developable size and multiplied by the amount of buildings that could be placed there for a shopping center, multiply the shopping center size times the typical retail dollars spent per square foot in a shopping center adding it to the City's share of the property tax bill with a theoretical project, $200,070,000 per year could be generated. A multiple office build- ing could also be constructed on the same 28 acres discounted by the developable land. An office project would be larger in square footage than the retail center project but would generate very little in retail sales tax or point of sale tax. The only taxation of an office building is that which may be generated by goods or services sold at the site which generally is very small. As to the legal aspects discussed, CA/Arczynski stated that discussions that have taken place with the Planning Commission and staff have lead them to believe that some type of consideration by way of either a conditional use permit process, devel- opment agreement requirement or whatever may be needed, some type of return to the community could be appropriate. He indicated that the action before Council was to receive testimony with respect to the proposals that have been framed by the Commission and either direct staff to prepare the appropriate Ordinance to effectuate them or return them to the Planning Commission for further discussion and analysis. A third alternative would be to take back the issue and put it in line with the Development Code and General Plan Process and deal with it all as one package. M/Werner declared the Public Hearing open. Mr. Randy Hertel, Majestic Realty, 13191 Crossroads Parkway N., Industry, stated that his MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 13 company is involved in a piece of property related to the issue before the Council. He discussed what has transpired since the Council considered the matter in November 1990 and stated that he supports the quasi -public uses in C -M Zones subject to Conditional Use Permits. The following persons spoke in favor of a pro- vision to allow quasi -public uses in C -M Zones through the CUP process: Michael & Georgiana Rodriguez, 245 Cottonwood Cove Gus Reza, 600-D N. Golden Springs Guy L. Benfante, 22832 Hilton Head Dr., #111 presented over 140 petitions from D.B. residents who support the Chapel. Gail L. Rusnak, 1104 S. Cleghorn Dr. Michael Maddox, 24046 Willow Creek Rd. Anthony Ramirez, 23737 Golden Springs Dr. Ken Ybarra, 616 N. Looking Glass Dr. Daniel J. & Brenda Kelly, 215 N. Platina Dr. Rafael & Linda Carerra, 745 S. Panhandle Dr. David Kane, 21050 Chirping Sparrow, Brea Sarah Trina, 448-G N. Golden Springs Jeff Milinson, resident of Diamond Bar Victor Pinquenlez, resident of Diamond Bar Sheena Walls, resident of Diamond Bar Kathy Trujillo, resident of Diamond Bar Cecilia Gonzalez, resident of Walnut Mike Villareal, 24135 Palomino Priscilla Castaneda, 21202 Choctaw Dr. Kim Reuland, 2306 Shady Hills presented petitions signed by D.B. residents in favor of the Chapel. Ron Kasman, resident of Diamond Bar Alfred & Denise Cuevas, 3448 Crooked Creek Dr. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 14 Bernie Grant, representative of Calvary Chapel, West Covina, stated that it was not the intent to make the property at Grand Ave. and Golden Springs the focus of this issue, but hoped the City would allow the church in the C -M zone with a CUP. The intention is to convert the existing building to a church, offices, school, etc. while the remaining property would be for future development. Arlene Reyes, resident of Diamond Bar Jeff Clifford, resident of Diamond Bar With no further testimony offered, M/Werner closed the Public Hearing. C/Papen stated that the City is going through a General Plan review at this time. She was concerned about the proper use of the property, the number of people involved in the issue and the impact on traffic congestion. M/Werner stated the issue is not about a church, but whether a church, hospital or other non - retail -generating revenue activity will fit in with the future viability of the City. Further, the Planning Commission suggested a fiscal impact report and an Ordinance for Council evaluation. He suggested that the Planning Commission frame the Ordinance in the direction suggested in terms of fiscal analyses and include "if an institu- tional use were to be located in a prime commer- cial area, how is that going to be, in terms of marketability, of the remainder of that commercial use." C/Narddlla stated the opinions expressed by the public were very important; however, the issue before the Council was consideration of an Ordinance to allow a particular type of use in a commercial zone. As part of the Council's responsibility in setting a course for the next 10 to 15 years, several studies were initiated with their conclusions intended to measure the progress of the City. He further stated that a change at this point would be premature until such time as the General Plan Committee reports on the City's needs. C/Kim stated although he was inclined to favor a resolution, he concurred with Council that the General Plan should be looked at in order to determine the long term impacts on the community. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 15 MPT/Forbing stated that he was in agreement with M/Werner regarding an ordinance to allow quasi - public use; however, it is the responsibility of the Council to watch over the financial aspects of the City and the sources of income the City has available must be considered. CA/Arczynski explained that the matter would have to go back to the Commission for review and recom- mendation, perhaps in the form of an Ordinance, which would then be brought back to the Council at another Public Hearing in approximately 45 to 60 days. Mr. Kaplan stated that an ordinance could be prepared to identify how to apply for a condi- tional use permit and/or development agreement. There can be an Ordinance in place and the church can begin to process an application under the Ordinance, but the City would not be prepared to make an evaluation until the General Plan is adopted, and it would still be a conditional use permit, which means that if the conditions are not satisfied, the permit need not be approved at all. CA/Arczynski stated that the finding that Council must make to adopt this type of Ordinance is that while there is no General Plan, it is likely that the adoption of such an Ordinance would not be in conflict with a proposed General Plan or ultim- ately detrimental to what the proposed General Plan will say when it is completed. The issue is whether the Council is ready to make a finding that such an Ordinance complies with what the General Plan will likely be, and if it doesn't, that it isn't detrimental to the Plan. Following discussion, C/Kim moved to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance for future consideration and at that time, compare it with the General Plan. Further, direct staff to prepare the necessary conditions. MPT/Forbing seconded the motion. C/Nardella suggested that staff draft an Ordinance to be used for this particular use as well as any number of other changes. Further, he felt that there was not enough information to adopt the Ordinance; however, if an Ordinance is adopted, it does not mean the applicants looking for this type of exemption would be guaranteed. C/Papen stated that she disagreed with the motion, because Council should 4W set policy before the proper plans are in place. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 16 M/Werner stated that the draft Ordinance should include a fee mechanism providing that a developer pay staff or consultant costs whenever a proced- dural adjustment such as this is requested. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Nardella, Kim, MPT/ Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd.) Council Committee Council concurred with appointments to committees Appointments as outlined on the staff report. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Papen expressed concern over the lack of adopted fees based on AB1600 because Council had just approved their first project based on the County's fee structure. Further, she requested staff to ask the Planning Commission to look at parking requirements for commercial developments, espec- ially the number of compact car spaces allowed and the ratio per use. C/Kim stated that it was his understanding that the Pathfinder Bridge Project would cost approx- imately $2.4 million --$300,000 from CalTrans, $300,000 from County Prop A and $547,000 from Prop A funds exchanged with LACTC and wanted to know where the remaining $900,000 will come from. He suggested that since there is a potential development on the other side of Pathfinder, it might be wise to increase development fees to partially pay for the Pathfinder widening and asked staff to look into this. He also expressed concern regarding Grand Ave. traffic, which is not improving, and requested that the City Attorney look into the concept of a toll road fee. He also asked the City Engineer to see what could be done to make Grand Ave. more miserable to drive and therefore, force drivers to utilize Chino Hills Parkway more. This could be accomplished by more signals, lower speed limits, etc. He announced that Supervisor Deane Dana had indicated an interest in working with the City to either buy or exchange the Country Club land with the County and he requested that staff report on this issue at a future meeting. MPT/Forbing thanked Council for appointing him as Mayor. MARCH 19, 1991 PAGE 17 M/Werner congratulated both M/Forbing and MPT/Kim. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Werner adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MARCH 29, 1991 CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. in the Conference Room, at City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California. ROLL CALL: Mayor Werner, Councilmen Papen, Nardella, and Kim. Mayor Pro Tem Forbing arrived at 8:40 a.m. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, Deputy City Attorney William P. Curley, III and Deputy City Clerk Tommye Nice. NEW BUSINESS: Ordinance 1 DCA/Curley stated that the California Clean Air (1991) Vehicle of 1988 sets forth mandates to the State to clean Registration Fees the air. Since most cities and counties do not for Air Quality have funds for this purpose, the Legislature pro - Improvement vided for imposition of a $2.00 fee on vehicle registrations. Those funds can be used by local agencies to implement air quality cleanup programs. As a precondition to obtaining the funds, each local agency must have an Ordinance in place by April 1, 1991, approved by a 4/5 vote, that sets forth willingness to comply with the various laws and regulations. The Ordinance will be transmitted to the AQMD Board requesting the City's share of the funds. C/Nardella stated that he understood that the funds will be collected whether or not an Ordinance is adopted. By adopting an Ordinance, the City is requesting return of its share. DCA/Curley pointed out that if the Council doesn't adopt an Ordinance, the City's share will be allocated pro rata to jurisdictions that have adopted Ordinances. The need for adoption of this as an Urgency Ordinance was due to the fact that the AQMD recently decided that an April 1, 1991 deadline for cities' adoption of Ordinances would enable them to get funds earlier, which precluded the City adopting said Ordinance during regularly - scheduled Council meetings. In response to M/Werner's question regarding the City's responsibilities, DCA/Curley stated that that can not be specifically detailed. The County and LACTC are working on a congestion management plan and the funds could be used for implementa- tion of such plan. The funds may also be provided for requirements under the Clean Air Act, i.e., ridesharing or other improvements that the commun- ity can put into effect to cut traffic rates. He understood that LACTC will be ready with their model Ordinance and congestion management plan MARCH 29, 1991 PAGE 2 in May 1991. Most communities are planning to use that as the basis for implementing their own plans on how to reduce mobile air sources. A variety of programs can be recommended and local agencies will have control over which programs to imple- ment. M/Werner asked if this meant that the City would be obligated to support the Air Quality Management Plan. DCA/Curley stated that he could not see how this would create a direct obligation to support the Plan. The primary basis stems from implementing the Clean Air Act, which is a Statewide rather than local or regional law. M/Werner asked if there were any irreversible commitments that may be made. DCA/Curley stated that according to the way the statute reads, the worst case is that they would cut off funding. If the City did nothing, whatever had been accrued could not be recap- tured, but no additional funding would be made available until such time as a measure had been implemented in accordance with the overall plan. CM/Van Nort stated that the City would receive approximately $30,000 - $40,000 based on $.40 for each dollar collected per vehicle registered to City residents for the first year. Following discussion, MPT/Forbing moved, C/Papen seconded to read by title only, waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1 (1991) entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ADMINISTRATING THE IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEES TO BE USED FOR AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PURPOSES, AND ESTABLISHING A TRUST ACCOUNT FOR THE DEPOSIT OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF SUCH FEES RECEIVED FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND PROVIDING FOR ITS ADOPTION AS AN URGENCY MEASURE. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Nardella, Kim, MPT/Forbing, M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None C/Nardella asked that staff look into how the matter came about as an urgency measure as opposed to being on the regular agenda. A letter may be MARCH 29, 1991 PAGE 3 sent to the AQMD depending on the results of that investigation. CM/Van Nort stated that he would have the information to Council in two weeks. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Werner adjourned the meeting at 8:50 a.m. ATTEST: Mayor Tommye A. Nice Deputy City Clerk 1-0 k "_' MINUTES 8F *UP I%Tmv �evunr� REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 2, 1991 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: COUNCIL COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: MPT/Kim called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California. The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Mayor Pro Tem Kim. Mayor Pro Tem Kim, Councilmen Werner, Nardella, and Papen. Mayor Forbing was excused. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Planning Director James DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Mousavi, Parks & Maintenance Director Charles Janiel and City Clerk Lynda Burgess. None provided. Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., spoke regard- ing discussions about mandatory water conservation with the Walnut Valley Water District. CONSENT CALENDAR: CM/Van Nort stated that the Warrant Register amount was been amended to reduce the payment to the Chamber of Commerce from $336 to $280. The adjusted Warrant amount was $447,103.99. C/Werner moved, seconded by C/Nardella to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Nardella, Papen, MPT/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - M/Forbing Schedule Future A. Planning Commission - April 8, 1991 - 6:30 Meetings p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. B. City Council Budget Study Session - April 9, 1991 - 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. C. Parks & Recreation Commission - April 11, 1991- 7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100 D. Traffic & Transportation Commission - April 11, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., Community room, 1061 Grand Ave. E. 2nd Anniversary Celebration - April 13, 1991 - 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. - Diamond Bar High School F. City Council Meeting - April 16, 1991 6:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 2, 1991 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: COUNCIL COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: MPT/Kim called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California. The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Mayor Pro Tem Kim. Mayor Pro Tem Kim, Councilmen Werner, Nardella, and Papen. Mayor Forbing was excused. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Planning Director James DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Mousavi, Parks & Maintenance Director Charles Janiel and City Clerk Lynda Burgess. None provided. Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., spoke regard- ing discussions about mandatory water conservation with the Walnut Valley Water District. CONSENT CALENDAR: CM/Van Nort stated that the Warrant Register amount was been amended to reduce the payment to the Chamber of Commerce from $336 to $280. The adjusted Warrant amount was $447,103.99. Schedule Future Meetings C/Werner moved, seconded by C/Nardella to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Werner, Nardella, Papen, MPT/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - M/Werner A. Planning Commission - April 8, 1991 - 6:30 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. B. City Council Budget Study Session - April 9, 1991 - 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. C. Parks & Recreation Commission - April 11, 1991- 7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100 D. Traffic & Transportation Commission - April 11, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., Community room, 1061 Grand Ave. E. 2nd Anniversary Celebration - April 13, 1991 - 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. - Diamond Bar High School F. City Council Meeting - April 16, 1991 6:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 2 G. Planning Commission - April 22, 1991 - 6:30 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. Warrant Register Approved amended Warrant Register dated April 2, 1991 in the amount of $447,103.99. Treasurer's Report Approved Treasurer's Report for the month of February, 1991. Parks & Rec. Received and filed Parks & Recreation Commission Comm. Minutes Minutes of March 14, 1991. Claim for Damages Denied Claim for Damages filed by Sean Patrick Rogers on March 8, 1991 and claim filed by Joe Aguilar on March 20, 1991. Resolution 91-14 Adopted Resolution No. 91-14 entitled: A Approving Plans RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF & Specs. for DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Landscape & FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OF Irrigation Maint. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 38 IN SAID LLD No. 38 CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. Resolution 91-15 Adopted Resolution No. 91-15 entitled: A Approving Plans RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF & Specs. for DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Landscape & FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OF Irrigation Maint. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 39 IN SAID LLD No. 39 CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. Resolution 91-16 Adopted Resolution No. 91-16 entitled: A Approving Plans RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF & Specs. for DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Landscape & FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OF Irrigation Maint. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 41 IN SAID LLD No. 41 CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. Resolution 91-17 Adopted Resolution No. 91-17 entitled: A Approving Plans RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF & Specs. for DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Maintenance Svcs. FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR EIGHT (8) CITY for Eight Parks PARKS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. Resignation - Received and filed resignation of Dr. Alba Traffic & Trans. Moesser, Traffic & Transportation Commissioner, Commission and declared the seat vacant. APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 3 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: City Tile - C/Werner and C/Nardella presented a City Tile to Dr. Alba Moesser Dr. Alba Moesser in appreciation for her service to the community as a member of the Traffic & Transportation Commission. City Tile - As Ms. Donna Johnson, Report for the San Gabriel Donna Johnson, Valley Tribune was unable to be in attendance, "Journalist of Council will forward to her the City Tile in the Year" recognition of her "Journalist of the Year" award by the Southern California Association of Governments. Proclamation - Proclaimed the week of April 28 - May 5, 1991 April 28 -May 5 as "Child Passenger Safety Week." "Child Passenger Safety Week" Proclamation - Proclaimed the month of April, 1991 as "Fair April, 1991 Housing Month." "Fair Housing Month" OLD BUSINESS: 2nd Anniversary Administrative Analyst Kellee Fritzal reported Celebration on the events scheduled for the 2nd Anniversary Update Celebration to be held April 13, 1991 at Diamond Bar High School and presented Council with T- shirts that will be sold at the event. Sheriff Depart. CM/Van Nort reported that the Walnut Sheriff Contract - had developed a law enforcement contract for the FY 1991-92 1991-92 fiscal year that would meet the needs of the changing community yet remain within Council expenditure guidelines. The same level of general law units will be provided and, for the first time, motorcycle traffic enforcement will be included. Other changes include: increase from .8 to 1.0 SANE officers to provide year-round narcotics education; (2) expanded crime prevention budget of $7,500; (3) a shared narcotics officer and 4) enhanced gang enforcement. He recommended continuing the Sheriff's contract for fiscal year 1991-92 in the amount of $3,953,159 which represents an approximate 6.2% increase over the current budget (5.5% for salaries). Lt. Mike Muravez stated that, in conjunction with the D.B. Rotary Club, the Station operates a 1- 800 -272 -GANG phone line 24 hrs./day to elicit information from people about gangs or want to make inquiries about gang activities. Also, in the near future, a program designed to combat auto APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 4 auto theft, to be called "CAT" will begin. Persons not normally using their vehicles between 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. can be registered with the Sheriff's Department and receive a sticker for their car. The sticker is universally recognized by law enforcement agencies nationwide and the program is designed so that if the car is seen on the highway between those hours, it will give an officer cause to stop it and ascertain whether the driver and/or occupants have a legitimate right to drive that car. He continued his presentation with a discussion of the various crimes that have occurred in the City. Mr. David Cope, 316 S. Del Sol Ln, asked why there is a need for motorcycle officers and felt that the City cannot afford an increase in liability for these officers. CM/Van Nort stated that there will still be the same number of general law units in the City but there will be an exchange of vehicles for motorcycle units. The responsibility in the event a motorcycle officer is injured rests solely with the Sheriff's Department. If the Sheriff's Department finds that it is not in their interests because of Worker's Comp. claims, etc., they will disband the program; however, it is felt that it is in the best interest of the City due to location and problems with traffic. Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest, asked when the CAT program goes into effect. Lt. Muravez stated that it should begin by the end of April, 1991. C/Werner moved, C/Nardella seconded to approve the 1991-92 law enforcement contract with L.A. County Sheriff's Department as recommended by staff. With the following Roll Call Vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Nardella, Papen, Werner, MPT/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - M/Forbing Solid Waste Administrative Analyst Troy Butzlaff gave an Update informational update on integrated waste management activities from November, 1991 to the present and indicated that formation of an advisory committee or committees to assist in the planning and review process of the draft SRRE should be considered. He proposed that it be comprised of an undetermined number of community APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 5 members appointed by the Council to offer technical expertise in solid waste management issues. Some of the activities of the committee could include monitoring, reviewing and making recommendations to the Council on solid waste programming; reviewing and making recommendations on AB939 programming and implementation of the SRRE; exploring options to landfilling; interfacing with appropriate commissions and private interests in planning and developing solid waste programming. Several cities in the San Gabriel Valley have already established committees of this type. In regard to permit fees, he stated that the City collected $12,614 for the first two months of 1991. If this trend remains for the remainder of the year, the system will generate an estimated $75,684 in revenues, of which $37,842 is designated for the remainder of this fiscal year. C/Werner asked about the schedule of decisions that the City will have to make in order to proceed with the waste management program. AA/Butzlaff stated that the SRRE, which will guide the City on integrated waste management issues now and in the future, will not be presented to the City until June, 1991. However, at this time the City could implement certain provisions to allow for recycling in the community. C/Papen asked staff to ascertain when each of the waste haulers began operating in the City. She also requested that the Planning Department pro- vide the actual count of single family residences, as well as perform a drive-by audit of container users in the City. Further, she directed staff to attempt to obtain a copy of the rough draft of the waste characterization study for Council review. Following discussion, M/Kim asked for Council direction on the formation of a solid waste advisory committee. C/Werner stated that he would like to know the composition of the committee, the function, and who they would be responsible to. Staff was further asked for input as how the committee could be integrated with the City's waste program. C/Papen asked for an accounting of solid waste facilities located in other cities which have formed an advisory committees. Some cities have actual landfills or transfer stations or depots for the solid waste haulers. She stated that she was not sure there was a need to have a large APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 6 advisory committee when all that is being done is having trash picked up at the curb and taking it to a transfer station or landfill. C/Nardella concurred with C/Papen's concerns. Following further discussion, staff was directed to prepare a report on proposed recycling pro- grams, a master recycling plan for the City and recommendations on the solid waste advisory committee at the June 4, 1991 meeting. It was agreed that a study session would be held prior to the June 4 regular Council meeting, possibly at 3 or 4:00 p.m. AA/Butzlaff stated that at the May 7, 1991 meeting, he would have a report on the recycling proposals that have been received. Emergency ACM/Belanger reported on a proposed agreement with Preparedness the DBIA regarding a "self-help" emergency prepar- edness program at the neighborhood level. The program would have three parts which consist of the City retaining a part-time contractor on a two year basis with a portion of the contract being paid by FEMA. The contractor would be expected to complete an emergency preparedness self-help plan as well as develop an implementation program and work with the DBIA Liaison to organize neighbor- hood volunteers whose goal would be to implement the program. In response to C/Nardella's questions, ACM/ Belanger stated that the DBIA would be involved in implementation of the program; identifying commun- ity volunteers; assisting the City in training volunteers and establishing the important neighborhood organizations which would be the foundation of the program. Mr. Bob Zirbes, President of the DBIA, stated that they are looking forward to working with the City in implementing this program. C/Werner moved, C/Nardella seconded to approve the concept of the proposed budget for the 1991-92 fiscal year regarding emergency preparedness and enter into follow-up discussions and ultimate agreement between the DBIA and the City in terms of providing services for the emergency prepared- ness program as recommended by staff. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 7 AYES: COUNCILMEN - Papen, Werner, Nardella, MPT/Kim NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - M/Forbing ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Nardella asked for a staff report regarding the Architectural Review Committee and announced that persons interested in becoming a member of the Traffic and Transportation Commission could contact him. C/Papen announced that L.A. County will stage an Emergency Fair during the 2nd Anniversary Celebration. Further, on April 10, the Senate Local Government Committee will be conduct a hear- ing on SB169 and SB203 and requested that the Council go on record supporting SB169 and opposing SB203 and that a letter be sent to each member of the Senate Local Government Committee prior to the hearing. C/Kim requested that the City Engineer approach The Country to see if they would be willing to contribute money toward the installation of a traffic signal system at the Diamond Bar Blvd. entrance. He has received several complaints. CLOSED SESSION: There being no further business to conduct, MPT/ Kim adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 7:40 p.m. for discussion of Litigation and Personnel matters. ADJOURNMENT: MPT/Kim reconvened Regular Session at 8:25 p.m., declared that there was no reportable action and adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m. LYNDA BURGESS City Clerk ATTEST: Mayor Pro Tem I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Councilmembers Papen and Rim FROM: Linda G. Magnuson�1�enior Accountant SUBJECT: Voucher Register, April 16, 1991 DATE: April 10, 1991 Attached is the Voucher Register dated April 16, 1991. As requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to it's entry on the Consent Calender. The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final approval is received. Please review and sign the attached. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL The attached listing of vouchers dated April 16, 1991 have been audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby allowed from the following funds in these amounts: FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 001 General Fund 138 LLAD #38 Fund 139 LLAD #39 Fund 141 LLAD #41 Fund 250 CIP Fund TOTAL ALL FUNDS APPROVED BY: Linda G. Magnuson Senior Accountant �✓ ��4't Robert L. Van Nort City Manager AMOUNT $279,496.18 2,172.06 8,411.34 3,318.59 18,643.32 $312,041.49 Phyllis E. Papen Councilmember Jay C. Kim Councilmember V U U L, -I E R qlEGISTER. PJH` 1, E Ti�E : 16 c jjl C T HRU ............. Nia VE) " -DOR NIAME PREPAID A C CO U,111 T r' (r _fA—C-L E:N.TR Y DUE T�'�VnT,— DESCRTP�TnN T A . ;— - Fl. — C, HE'C K ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A oll 2 e S t c i cm j t,k 1 4N o, 7 vi a,V/ Pp - HE VEPZ 7--- --------- E12, E 1 u E 7- `7 K! ala_ r "n z D' VE - - - - - - - - 7 1 L �7c 2al p'A S, la n 1 i --------------------------- 4 11 C H E T N. T E S DUE THRU ............ l:Nn..7r 7,1. -NO NO P D N i,c :c :PIP T t., --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1 L �7c 2al p'A S, la n 1 i --------------------------- Tq-T ............. r,4;116:91 Dic, 7 r, PREPAID I N E iN, T T �J f�, T C E r 74 T 0 T T t4 ,.R Y/DUE 'T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i--,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - - - - - - - - - t 4 v I i 'L'.i'..D'!S 5' 3_ t * t RON TRE: 1011 Mbf! !RES:STER PASE WOR WE AIN 1D• t t PREPAD MOT PhIMAT STIP FUMIX. EURMH MCHE DEHRUTHN AMMNT 2GE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1411, 0-11E lKnO IM 21 PIN 1 -- -------- -- -------- 09 All: sn"! VQO�Vnn�- 71A. 4Qf5Q2YAGQ 1 n�lvb V A j� it 11AA; Ala cn�7 :A: nat AM 7 14 1: Q,�S KOM hn 1K 2- v chip 4=�S TK A 4 S'. L 1 10134 Ain. 022 01 4N Wl-SIMS)b 1 !N�? QK in; nn. va�; Tv QW4322450 2 11-1:i Owl? W11 M31, MO. RSq Onn 49 AGPISH431a 1 1VA oils 04,12 10>2 Main- Enmhze 4: 204 W 00�4228-5311 4 WS 1M &at Who hminAnE Em', IIDP45314211 1 14-:0 2010 Isis NPUR Mn. bamms iv- W u4�454SM; 1 Win 34 0; 14 is wool nkn Ent 141 sh a *13M294511 lb�iv 0; No 3�12 Mo ran!. Ent ST E 109103114215 2 !O_IE 0405 1416 Wh; Rum, own Tom 0AP409120 1 Wish TOM Win @K27v 1111d ImPF&UPI 0, q4A'- TT 16 1 9 f] Ul C H F R R E G I T E R E DUE THRO .............@ 4 11 v ENNA f ".1 4 4- A 1, IPS', P P C, I T Y - j�,l rj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1, T t.,j E f tq"�,l ENTFY iDUC TNPOTIE D7UPTPTION CHECK L 7, -C,T --- -------- s-] TIC L ",!T --------- jz 7, --- -------- R -------- I -�T2 2 2 0 TT_ T r r i R Co I i 2 R! N T --"i .... 1 4 i l-0 P Q I !V ii U C H E R PECIS.TER p 43 E DUE T PIRU; ............. C",111 5'`ql E.1 R PREPAID A,-,- -I] ";TVDLE NEAC 1,N ") Gj 1 C H-SOR i OT i o-, C h Ec ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 -'7 f7 - - - - - - - - - VENH'. - ---------- i t v o f D i a m c n d B a P_rN T I"C S U C H E F R S T T t R —ITPV J�jVOT D; C CR I P T C -, lj N "Or', T" -kin, E A 7 I., — I , � , — � C ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P A. �Lz ?R',PATn n r, "jU 3j T DAT' r p _ r __________________________ L 1 i 1-17L r�' ..L\ P.-' — — — — — — — LL— -- - - - - - - - - en k Rp, 2 A 6o u 1 '7 jD Z T r, HdF. R — — — — — — — — -j 4 On ci 1 ML PZZP",Tr; AMr,'NT - - - - 77PL -,I!c VENE-00 H L R REGISTER Dec T H R L' . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 T P R C 7 X - NIHO ACF�Otj. Ni . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A P 0 L I E Nu . N C T 1p�, � 1 C1 I III T t C 1 ij 7 D 7- 7 -- - - - - - - - - j I in C E s o n L -- - - - - - - - - -- ucit-np, tv Q i -,�-ia7icnd s a 1 * RUN TRE: 10:1 j4qjjj VOU�-HE-'v R E 6 : , � .. HE THE . . . . . ... N/nRi LINEN NAME- VENCR 15. ACCOUNT 001000 KV VAINE10. EURUDUE low 1 PHU!! -MOUNT DATE CHEGF. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _+.E, E it 2 3 2, >�nvssj. i ;kalflut Vjy ��tj: *1:'9`45;'3 2:_= 2 .- 16 D ' T-7 'DUE EPC,,-.� V --------- -- -------- W Vat g! R2,11 nn:; f D d B 7 R I, N -11 Mr-- : 16 ;A f 0 71 V 0 U H E 10) R G T 7 Q PAH 1 T .......... �4 1, J!?_ 1 VEA"Dop NAME P, AC CUT-! Nil T F 7 T V-IjJCj PATE: P -D 7 N, 0 E 14 D U, I -F CRL T P T T N M 0,- N T 'ATE C!, v ,Jw . A ---------- ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ro- I T7 T_ T --- - - - - - - - - - 7— — — — — — — — — — — — - -— ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - vkhmH Fad -.i: 2SK.W. Fin! K -AL L V o i D i d D UN TIE: 1011 MU91 0 i C H E„ R E 6 i S T E R I -ASE FUIND SUMMA3`,�' REPORT DUE ....... ?14/161i1 31HURSE SIL SZE WEL PHT GH FEE POSTEP FUTuRE TRANNCTION-S F GNI, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tq MET by RE. BUE EVEHE RE', E EVENEE RNEUE EEAFE vkhmH Fad -.i: 2SK.W. Fin! K -AL AGENDA NO. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: April 2, 1991 MEETING DATE: April 16, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Sid Jalal Mousavi, City Engineer/Publi �s Director SUBJECT: LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 38, 39, & 41 The Board of Supervisors approved the formation of County Diamond Bar Lighting and Landscape Assessment District Nos. 38, 39, and 41 for the providing funds for the maintenance of landscaped open -spaces located therein pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Upon incorporation, jurisdiction of these Districts has been transferred from the County to the City of Diamond Bar. Similar funds must also be provided this year to enable these Districts to continue their operation during the 1991-92 Fiscal Year. DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION Attached resolutions direct staff to prepare the Engineer's Report for the Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Landscaping Assessments Districts Nos. 38, 39, and 41. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolutions and authorize staff to prepare the Reports. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ N/A Budgeted Amount $ N/A In Account Number: Deficit: $ N/A Revenue Source: Robert L. Van Nort City Manager ---------------------- \_7 --------------- - Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Bela er City Attorney Assistant City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. 41 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. A. RECITALS. (i) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California has an annual program for the maintenance of certain landscaping and open space improvements and property and intends to continue said program and the cost of such maintenance to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments upon lands within City of Diamond Bar LLA District No. 41; and (ii) Proceedings are provided for by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2, Division 15, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of the Council, to maintain landscaping and open space improvements and property hereafter mentioned in said maintenance district in the City. 2. The Council hereby determines in general the nature, location and extent of such annual maintenance program as follows: LLA District No. 41 consists of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the assessment diagram labeled "Exhibit A-3" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The maintenance and restoration of street lighting and landscaping and open space improvements, including irrigation, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed control, drainage systems, irrigation control system improvements, and miscellaneous related work within easement areas for said purpose within the above properties. The annual program for maintenance work within LLA District No. 41, Fiscal Year 1991-92 is conducted by City force account, contractual services, the City Manager's work program, and the functional budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92 describes the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. These documents are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in this resolution. 3. The Council hereby orders the preparation and filing of an annual Engineer's Report pursuant to said Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSES, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1991. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, the City Clerk of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1991 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. 39 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. A. RECITALS. (i) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California has an annual program for the maintenance of certain landscaping and open space improvements and property and intends to continue said program and the cost of such maintenance to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments upon lands within City of Diamond Bar LLA District No. 39; and (ii) Proceedings are provided for by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2, Division 15, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of the Council, to maintain landscaping and open space improvements and property hereafter mentioned in said maintenance district in the City. 2. The Council hereby determines in general the nature, location and extent of such annual maintenance program as follows: LLA District No. 39 consists of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the assessment diagram labeled "Exhibit A-2" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The maintenance and restoration of street lighting and landscaping and open space improvements, including irrigation, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed control, drainage systems, irrigation control system improvements, and miscellaneous related work within easement areas for said purpose within the above properties. The annual program for maintenance work within LLA District No. 39, Fiscal Year 1991-92 is conducted by City force account, contractual services, the City Manager's work program, and the functional budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92 describes the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. These documents are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in this resolution. 3. The Council hereby orders the preparation and filing of an annual Engineer's Report pursuant to said Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSES, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1991. or I, LYNDA BURGESS, the City Clerk of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1991 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. A. RECITALS. (i) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California has an annual program for the maintenance of certain landscaping and open space improvements and property and intends to continue said program and the cost of such maintenance to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments upon lands within City of Diamond Bar LLA District No. 38; and (ii) Proceedings are provided for by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2, Division 15, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of the Council, to maintain landscaping and open space improvements and property hereafter mentioned in said maintenance district in the City. 2. The Council hereby determines in general the nature, location and extent of such annual maintenance program as follows: LLA District No. 38 consists of all assessable parcels located within the boundaries shown on the assessment diagram labeled "Exhibit A-1" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The maintenance and restoration of street lighting and landscaping and open space improvements, including irrigation, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed control, drainage systems, irrigation control system improvements, and miscellaneous related work within easement areas for said purpose within the above properties. The annual program for maintenance work within LLA District No. 38, Fiscal Year 1991-92 is conducted by City force account, contractual services, the City Manager's work program, and the functional budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92 describes the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. These documents are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in this resolution. 3. The Council hereby orders the preparation and filing of an annual Engineer's Report pursuant to said Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSES, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. Mayor I, LYNDA BURGESS, the City Clerk of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1991 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar CARL WARREN & CO. Insurance Adtusters Claims Administrators PO Boz 25180 Santa Ana, CA 92799-5180 (714) 972-3146 (800) 572-6900 TO: City of Diamond Bar Attention: Linda Burgess Re: Claim: Claimant: D/Event: Rec'd Y/Office Our File: Date: March 27, Sage vs Diamond Bar Marisa Sage 3-05-91 3-19-91 S 65499 AB 1991 We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. [� CLAIM INSUFFICIENCY: In accordance with the telephone conversation of , 19 , a notice of insufficiency must be mailed to the claimant no later than , 19.THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORIGINAL CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SUBMIT A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Sections 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4. AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant, rejecting this additional/amended claim. (� LATE CLAIM RESPONSE: Return the original claim material to the claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only recourse is to file a written "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim". (Retain copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SEND A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Section 911.4. [� APPLICATION REJECTION: Reject claimant's "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim". See Government Code Section 911.8. TAKE NO ACTION: Defer any written response to the claimant pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very,truly yours, CARLIWARREN & COMPANY cc: S.C.J.P.I.A. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RESERVED FOIA FILING STAMP Claims for death or for injury to person or personal property or growing crops must be filed within 6 months of the occurrence which caused the injury. All other claims must be filed within one year. See Government Code 911.2. Read the entire claim before filing. Attach copies of estimates, bills, re- ceipts, and all other documents in support of the claim. Attach separate sheets for diagrams and additional information, if needed. SIGN EACH SHEET. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA NAME OF CLAIMANT DATE OF BIRTH OCCUPATION WiSA 5 � j14 y� � � �I �?c c (1 �') 21 ` s r - S f t6c) ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT HOME PHONE WORK PRONE MAILING ADDRESS TO WHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT NAME OF CCNTA0T n CONTACT PHONE—I . U"0 `i _ M, 1.)11AJM 6 rJ. Py_'( DATE, TIME & PLACE OF OCCURRENCE ci L DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE �WC. NAMES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYE S WHO CAUSED INJURY, DAMAGE' R LOSS `) k4p:t rt (VL,S -- >1 etc a-�Lxkc 5 EXPLANATION OF Wi4YPUBLIC ENTITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS NAMES, ADDRESSES 8 PHONE NUMBERS OF WITNESSES 8 DOC TORS C�, G1k r1 �� w`;lPx�� k1�� A l C DESCRIPTION OF INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS ITEMIZED SIGNATURE OF 114 ' }}'1 OF CLAIM (ESTIMATED IF UNKNOWN) ATIVE N �'�N'�'.,l % f4\-6 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED WARNING: Presentation of a false claim is a criminal offense, and filed with the Clerk of the Public Entity. punishable by fine and imprisonment. See Penal Code 72. --10 aw, CARL WARREN & CO. . Insurance Adjusters ,- Claims Administrators - P O Box 25180 Santa Ana, CA 92799-5180 ti (714) 9723146 (800) 572-6900 Date: April 1, 1991 -1 TO: City of Diamond Bar Attention: Robert Van Nort Re: Claim: Dungca vs Diamond Bar Claimant: Neil Dungca D/Event: 3-1-91 Rec'd Y/Office: 3-26-91 Our File: S 65509 AB We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take theaction indicated below: P/'CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. [:J CLAIM INSUFFICIENCY: In accordance with the telephone conversation of , 19 , a notice of insufficiency must be mailed to the claimant no later than , 19•THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORIGINAL CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SUBMIT A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Sections 910 and or 910.2 and/or 910.4. b AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant, rejecting this additional/amended claim. LATE CLAIM RESPONSE: Return the original claim material to the claimant, advising that the claim is late and that their only recourse is to file a written "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim". (Retain copies in your file.) THIS MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMANT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE CLAIM IN YOUR OFFICE. DO NOT SEND A "REJECTION" LETTER. See Government Code Section 911.4. i APPLICATION REJECTION: Reject claimant's "Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim". See Government Code Section 911.8. TAKE NO ACTION: Defer any written response to the claimant pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Ver truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY cc: S.C.J.P.I.A. _ J RESERVED FOR FlLfNG STAMP CLAIM FOR DAMAGES _ Claims for death or for injury to person or personal property or growing crops must be filed within 6 months of the occurrence which caused the injury. - All other claims must be filed within one year. See Government Code 911.2. Read the entire claim before filing. Attach copies of estimates, bills, re- ceipts, and alt other documents in support of the claim. Attach separate sheets for diagrams and additional information, if needed. SIGN EACH SHEET. TO CITY 4F DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA 1 UrtiLL% -17 -Z_ ULI�".it�.E�. NAME OF CLAIMANT DATE ,OF BIRTH OCCUPATION GL r--,� 1i I+� �Vf� r � L �¢ I - b-7c�1 I ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT HOME PHONE WORK PHONE L MAILING ADDRESS TO WHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT NAME OF CONTACT CONTACT PHONE �:tZS'� [•``�'� � c=`[- ,�-lC�k�t �t C�1(�t-117�.iE� �j�`•�\C l'�Lvii t�`i�i� ) c7lLti�jc_ l-���'-tG.�1�LC�:_f/.`. C:G�(i5 DATE. TIME & PLACE OF OCCURRENCE � ice'✓_� <<'c.7'.--,_�C�'._E�; LJ,� �; �!� Lir` �_--�_}�.- �'`�(:�; !'.it��_1 �� � it--L���>,t"CI.iS. C��f�tij_ /;�4� DESCRIPTION OFOCCURRENCE �^ l- C� L ` �1 .� 1 h tt`• i1� �, lS �' l\`� �\ ����� : ala t� C -6"L , "\ (y'. -� t � "� r L t' t l.y t-''v,�: -T Jt��'� �� ^..1 C1 j�'_��-�.'"•, ..7'�� �"l- l_\,- A r\ NAMES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES WHO CAUSED INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS EXPLANATION OF WHY PUBLIC ENTITY IS RE PONSIBLE FOR INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS NAMES, ADDRESSES & PHONE NUMBERS OF WITNESSES & DOCTORS � �.5�-% �, ts� S— �' t_ -h (_.'> •J _ � F � � "� t7 '.,�` fh'_G� r 1�3 T � f_' �: �:� {�, L�, ti -1 �t' �'r': DESCRIPTION OF INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS of ITEMIZED ITEMIZED AMOUNT OF CLAIM (ESTIMATED IF UNKNOWN) SIGNATURE OF CLAIMANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DA TE TYPED OR PRINTED NAME CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED WARNING: Presentation of a false claim is a criminal offense, and filed with the Clerk of the Public Entity. punishable by fine and imprisonment. See Penal Code 72. �i E_v1 TI'll 4GE M0,T10R T aIr AF r:-• 12727 '-MITTIE" DIVII. i;}ITTIER CA 9C-5;:=' 2131-945-7&78 CASH UAL TTunTi r�r' r•''rTr. ix lig C ?ti •-e' f•`•r ._" r U A end u s_ Vii_ Jr N: MOTORIAG 6666--1 s 1 NOW CHRiS1ENSEN I 12727 Whitti- Bi,d a WhKt— CR 10602 a 213 9,tS 7676 i ee � raesit 100 North Barranca Avenue • Suite aau West Covina, California 91791-1600 818/967-3147 • FAX 818/915-1143 April 5, 1991 Mr. Robert Van Nort City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Mr. Van Nort: This letter is to inform you of the status of incorporating Diamond Bar into the Joint Powers Authority for the Foothill Transit Zone, and to ask you to place the adoption of the amended Joint Powers Agreement on the next Diamond Bar City Council agenda. Enclosed are copies of the Joint Powers Agreement, and the amendment which incorporates the City of Diamond Bar into the JPA. Please have the City Council approve the signing of this amendment, and return a signed original to us this month. As we discussed, I have sent this amendment to the County of Los Angeles and the cities which are members of Foothill Transit for their approval this month. Enclosed is a copy of the cover letter which was sent to the Zone members. Also enclosed for your information is the Foothill Transit Executive Board April 10 agenda, which includes an item related to Diamond Bar's placement in the city clusters for Executive Board representation. Included in the agenda is a copy of the adopted Rules of the Zone which govern the placement of cities in clusters for representation on the Executive Board. The Executive Board will make a recommendation at the May 8, 1991 annual meeting regarding Diamond Bar's placement. I plan to discuss this with you at lunch on May 6. 1 look forward to working with you as a part of Foothill Transit. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this material. Very truly yours, William P. Forsythe Executive Director WPF/ais Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Agenda Please note room change. 7:30 AM, Wednesday, April 10, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone - Executive Offices 100 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 480, West Covina 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS - BARTLETT, KUHN, LEWIS, McMILLEN & WRIGHT 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 1990 & FEBRUARY 1991 4. REPORT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 5. INCLUSION OF DIAMOND BAR IN JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND REALIGNMENT OF CITY CT TTQ'PPIS 6. rS AT MAY 8, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT 7. ;PRESS AS "LINE 690" 8• VEEK OF OPERATION - LINE 690 9, 1TRACTOR TO PROCEED - LINES 187, 10. YEARS 1989 AND 1990 11. ''ONSULTANT 12. j __ _- i u EQUIP NEW ZONE OFFICES A. TELEPHONE SYSTEM B. FURNITURE - Continued - Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Agenda April 10, 1991 Page 2 13. APPROVE 1992-94 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 14. AUTHORIZATION TO ORDER MANUFACTURE OF REMAINING ZONE BUSES 15. FISCAL YEAR 1992 BUDGET 16. PUBLIC COMMENT 17. EXECUTIVE SESSION - LITIGATION 18. ADJOURNMENT Foothill Transit 100 North Barranca Avenue • Suite 980 West Covina, California 91791-1600 818/967-3147 • FAX 818/915-1143 April 4, 1991 To: Executive Board Members Re: Background Information for April 10, 1990 Board Meeting Agenda Item 4. Report from Executive Director A. Ruling by the Court of Appeals - On April 3, 1991, the Second Appellate District, Division Two issued a ruling which upheld the Superior Court decision in favor of Foothill Transit, in the law suit filed by the RTD unions against Foothill Transit, the LACTC and the RTD. Copies of the decision are attached. The decision appears to clear the way for the implementation of the remaining seven Zone lines after the decision becomes final - 30 days after the decision was issued. B. Report on Expenditures - The expenditure reports for February and March 1991 are attached to this memorandum. C. Monthly Operating Report - The report on operations for the months of January and February 1991 will be presented at the Board meeting. D. Mid Cities Area Transportation Zone - The Steering Committee for the Mid Cities Area Transportation Zone did not meet in March, but will reconvene on April 18. The primary topic for this meeting will be the 5 % of net budget contribution requirement imposed by the LACTC for transit operators. The May meeting is scheduled to focus on the evaluation of Foothill Transit which Ernst & Young is performing for the LACTC. Inclusion of Diamond Bar in Joint Powers Authority and Realignment of City Clusters - At the direction of the Executive Board, staff has distributed an amendment to the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Powers Agreement which will include the city of Diamond Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 2 Bar as a Zone member. The Zone member at each city has been asked to secure city council approval within the month of April 1991. After it joins the Joint Powers Authority, Diamond Bar must be placed in a city cluster for Executive Board representation. After discussions with Zone members who would be affected, staff is recommending a minor realignment of the cluster boundaries to accommodate the inclusion of Diamond Bar. It is recommended that the city of Baldwin Park be moved to cluster 3 (see attached map and city listing from the Zone rules) and that the city of Diamond Bar be included in cluster 4. This would balance the population of the clusters while maintaining the geographical adjacencies of cities within clusters. Staff recommends that the Executive Board forward this recommended placement of Diamond Bar in cluster 4, and the concurrent move of Baldwin Park to cluster 3, to the full Zone for action at the May 8, 1991 annual meeting. 6. Executive Board Appointments at May 8. 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Annual Meeting - As stated in the Zone Rules, adopted at the annual meeting in May 1988, all Executive Board members and alternates are appointed for a term of three years and stand for election at the same time. This was adopted to ensure the continuity of the Executive Board during the first three years of scheduled Zone service. It is important to note that both the members and alternates to the Executive Board must be selected from among the named members to the Zone. City council Zone alternates are not eligible to serve as Executive Board members or alternates. The three year terms expire at the May 8, 1991 annual Zone meeting. Staff recommends that the city selected Executive Board members notify the Zone members within their city clusters of the upcoming election at the May 8, 1991 meeting, and of the importance of this selection. 7. Designation of 210 Freeway Express as "Line 690" - Staff has worked with RTD to identify an appropriate line number for the new 210 freeway express service. RTD staff has concurred with the designation of this new service as Line 690. This line number is available on the lighted destination sign curtains on the front and side of Foothill Transit buses and does not conflict with the numbering system in place for RTD and Foothill Transit buses. It should be noted that the "400" series of lines which designates express service on RTD and Foothill buses is reserved for express bus service to the downtown Los Angeles area. Staff recommends that the designation of "Line 690"be adopted for the new 210 freeway service. Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 3 8. Free Fare Week for the First Week of Operation - Line 690 - Staff recommends that the new service on Line 690 begin with no charge for the first week of service. This would facilitate promotion of the service, and is consistent with previous action of the Board to offer free fare on the first day of service of other lines. 9. Authorization to Instruct Contractor to Proceed - Lines 187, 690. and 480/481 - Staff requests authorization to instruct ATE Management and Service Company, Inc. to proceed with the implementation of lines 187, 690, 480/481. A. The Board has previously authorized negotiations with ATE to operate Line 690, the new service along the 210 Freeway. Negotiations will be concluded prior to the Board meeting, and a recommended price per hour will be presented. B. Line 187 is the final line in a contract consisting of six lines, previously contracted to ATE. The other five lines (178, 185, 274/276 and 280) have been in operation since September 1989. Line 187 was subject to the stay imposed in August 1989 by the California Supreme Court. Staff recommends that this line begin operation by ATE at the earliest date possible, under the existing contract. B. Lines 480/481 were approved by the Executive Board as the next lines to implement. A Request for Proposals was distributed in 1989 and ATE was selected as the contractor for this service. However, due to the Court stay, a contract was not executed. Staff recommends that this contract be executed, subject to negotiation of the rate per hour. 10. Presentation of Audit of Fiscal Years 1989 and 1990 - The audit of Foothill Transit for fiscal years 1989 and 1990 has been completed. Mr. Syd Porter, Project Manager for Miranda Strabala & Associates will attend the meeting and present the audit findings for information to the Executive Board. 11. Selection of Marketing Study Consultant - Thirty-two firms received the Request for Proposals for the marketing "Attitude and Awareness" study. The deadline for submission of proposals was March 29, 1991. Seven firms submitted proposals and four responded with a decline to propose. The proposed budget is $45,000 for both a passenger survey and a non -rider survey. Staff has evaluated the proposals and narrowed the selection to three firms. Interviews of these firms are scheduled for Thursday, April 4, 1991. Staff will make a presentation and a recommendation to award a contract at the Board meeting. Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 4 12. Authorization to Equip New Zone Offices - At the February Executive Board Meeting, the Board authorized staff to enter into a new lease for an expanded office space and requested staff to evaluate the purchase of furnishings for the new space. The telephone system and office furniture are proposed to be funded from the Foothill Transit carryover account which the LACTC maintains in Foothill Transit's name, and not from the regular budget. Based on substantive research and evaluation staff proposes the following: A. Telephone System - Staff has met with representatives from both AT&T and PacTel Business Systems to discuss Foothill Transit's current telecommunication current and future needs. An important factor is the identification of a system that is easily expandable, as our needs require additional lines or stations. The system should also be easily upgraded as enhancements are developed. The system must be cost effective now and when expansion is required or enhancements added. Staff also evaluated the addition of voice mail as a means to increase productivity in the office and enhance the utilization of the phone system. The systems demonstrated were the Merlin System from AT&T and the Meridian/Norstar System from PacTel. Both systems appeared to meet the evaluation criteria. Price proposals were received from both firms with PacTel being the lowest, most responsive proposer. The negotiated price with PacTel is $24,131.38, including taxes and installation. PacTel will attend the Board Meeting to demonstrate the proposed system. Staff requests approval to execute a contract with PacTel in the amount of $24,131.38 for the recommended system B. Office Furniture - In conjunction with the expansion of office space, staff recommends the purchase of a new Board conference table and office furniture. After extensive research and negotiations, staff is recommending the purchase of a custom conference table/Board table, with matching office furniture at an amount not to exceed $45,000. Samples of the style, color and fabric will be presented at the Board Meeting. 13. Approve 1992-94 Short Range Transit Plan - Each year the Zone is required by the LACTC to submit a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The SRTP contains a description of anticipated service, the Zone's adopted budget and the subsidies required of the LACTC. Staff will present highlights of the Zone's Short Range Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 5 Transit Plan (which is attached to this report) at the Board meeting for discussion and adoption. 14. Authorization to Order Manufacture of Remaining Zone Buses - Staff requests authority to complete the manufacture of 45 Gillig buses which were previously bid to implement approved Foothill Transit service. This authority is requested due to the recent Court of Appeals decision. Staff further requests authority to negotiate the procurement of 12 additional buses to implement the service expansion program contained in the Short Range Transit Plan. 15. Fiscal Year 1992 Budget - The draft FY 1992 Budget is attached to this report. Staff recommends approval of the budget in concept, referral of the budget to the Administrative Advisory Committee for detailed review, and convening a special Board meeting for recommendation of a final budget prior to the May 8, 1991 Zone annual meeting. The draft budget is structured to continue existing operations, and then add additional components as the Zone is able to take over additional service. With the court decision issued on April 3, 1991, staff recommends adoption of the full budget. Very truly yours, William P. Forsythe Executive Director WPF/ais Attachments: Decision from Court of Appeals Expenditure Report Zone Rules (Including City Cluster Map and Listing) Short Range Transit Plan Foothill Transit FY 1992 Draft Budget 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 1277, AFL-CIO, UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, and NEIL SILVER, Plaintiffs and Appellants, vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, and FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE, Defendants and Respondents. 0 B 043891 (Super. Ct. No. C 687231) c� •-- c. �p�u, �s�catm cam. L E D APR 3 IN MERE M. VLULN G rl� Deputy CWk Appeal from a judgment -of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Eli Chernow, Judge. Affirmed. Joseph Freitas, Jr., William J. Flynn, and Neyhart, Anderson, Reilly & Freitas for Plaintiffs and Appellants Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277, AFL-CIO, and Neil Silver. Lawrence Drasin for Plaintiff and Appellant United Transportation Union. Suzanne B. Gifford, Jeffrey J. Lyon, and Richard A. Xataman for Defendant and Respondent Southern California Rapid Transit District. Dewitt Clinton, County Counsel, and Riordan & McKinzie, Kenneth Klein, and Thomas K. Bourke for Defendants and Respondents Los Angeles County Transportation Commission and Foothill Transit Zone. _ • I This action challenges the creation, by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (the "Commission"), of a new local transportation, zone, the Foothill Transit Zone ("FTZ"), within the service area of the Southern California Rapid Transit District ("RTD"), and to the order of the Commission directing transfer of fourteen bus routes from the RTD to the FTZ. The challenge was brought against the Commission, RTD, and FTZ by appellants Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277, AFL-CIO, and United Transportation Union (collectively, "the Unions"), the collective bargaining representatives of RTD employees, and by Neil Silver, a resident and taxpayer of Los Angeles County and President of Local 1277. They appeal from a final judgment in defendants' favor, denying injunctive relief. Appellants contends "A. Because RTD did not freely consent to the transfer of its lines to the Zone, the consent requirement of PUC § 99286 was not properly met. "B. The trial court erred when it interpreted the Public Utilities Code as *=powering the i,ACTC to dismember the RTD. , "C. The Zone approval violated PUC i 99221 as the proposed Zone service is to be 'provided And controlled' by the RTD. $ 30637. "D. The actions taken by Defendants are barred by,PUC 2. "E. The actjon& of RTD and LACTC violated the § 13(c) agreement between LACTC, RTD and UTU. "F. The trial court erred in not finding the action of LACTC as improper inducing of breach of contract. "G. The trial court erred In denying injunctive relief based on the UTU agreement." II. Following public hearings, committee meetings, and consultations with interested parties, including RTD, the Commission established guidelines for applications for a local transportation zone, indicating the nature of the RTD lines that could be included within the zone. In 1986, twenty cities in the San Gabriel Valley, joined by the County of Los Angeles, filed a pre -application which contemplated a zone geographically encompassing virtually the entire San Gabriel Valley, and thirty- five bus lines.v The application process proceeded through numerous public hearings before committees of the Commission and before the Commission itself. Comments were received from the general public, RTD, the Unions, and other interested parties. I. The twenty cities are Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina, Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Habra Heights, La Verne, Monrovia, Pomona, San Dimas, South E1 Monte, Temple City, Walnut, and West Covina. The proposed local transportation zone was originally called the San Gabriel Valley Transit Zone. 3. 4 nrf--:_•�- _ 1O JO : h' 1 �Jr Lr -d r �';i_r . i 11" CL . {IJ: c=�r,��c 4-4 1n due course the proposed zone Was scaled down to include only fourteen bus lines. RTD opposed the application, stating it supported the concept of local transportation zones but not the proposed FTZ. On December 7, 1987, however, the Commission approved the FTZ application, thus establishing the first local transportation zone in Los Angeles County. In connection with the creation of the zone, RTD was required to transfer to FTZ fourteen bus lines, each serving a portion of the zone. Some of these routes are over forty miles long, and some serve areas of the County outside the twenty cities, including Pasadena, La Puente, and downtown Los Angeles. FTZ was to operate these fourteen lines as its only service during a three-year demonstration phase. FTZ operations were to begin with two major express lines on July 1, 1988. The Unions and Silver commenced this action on May 25, 1988, and applied for a preliminary injunction forbidding RTD to transfer the lines until it had met its statutory and contractual obligations to its affected employees, and restraining the Commission from implementing or funding FTZ until RTD had consented to it. On June 22, 1988, the superior court issued a preliminary injunction restraining the Commission from implementing or funding FTZ without consent from RTD. On June 30, 1988, RTD filed a cross-complaint against the Commission and FTZ, seeking declaratory relief, an 4. injunction, and a peremptory writ of mandate establishing that creation of FTZ was unlawful because, inter alio, it had not given its consent and could not lawfully do to. The next day the Commission began withholding Proposition A discretionary funds from RTD in the amount of $9 million per month. (Proposition A instituted a one-half percent sales tax, some proceeds to be distributed by the Commission for transportation purposes.) RTD, in response, sued the Commission and made plans for a fifty percent reduction in bus service to take effect December 4, 1988. Within a few days thereafter, the Commission and RTD reached a compromise drafted by Mayor Tom Bradley, County Supervisor Dean Dana, and Jan Hall, an RTD Director. In this agreement RTD consented to creation of FTZ, the Commission released the withheld funds to RTD, and RTD withdrew its litigation against the Commission. operation of the first two FTZ lines commenced immediately. The Commission represented to the court, however, that no other routes would be transferred to FTZ pending trial. The action was tried, without a jury, from May 16 to June 21, 1989. Thereafter the trial court issued its 33 -page statement of decision, followed by entry of judgment for defendants on August 4, 1989. This appeal followed. Our Supreme Court restored the preliminary injunction with respect to all but four of the lines, pending final determination of the appeal. III. The parties have exhaustively presented their respective theories of the proper construction and application of numerous provisions of the Public Utilities Code, particularly sections 34637, 30754, 99209, 99209.1, 992100 99221, 992860 130003, 130261, and 130372. We have determined, however, that the appeal can be decided without resolving these statutory questions. our usual judicial reticence to make unnecessary rulings is reinforced by a circumstance made clear by all parties: this litigation is but a,skirmish in a much larger conflict now being waged in the legislative and executive branches of state and local government over control of public mass transit systems in Southern California. In such a situation we doubt the usefulness of a pleonastic judicial opinion. The judgment appealed from is the denial of a permanent injunction sought by Appellants to restrain formation and operation of FTZ. The decision whether to grant or deny an injunction is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Galton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation Dist. (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 914, 964-965.) The potential availability of a damages remedy is, of course, a strong factor justifying denial of injunctive relief. Even when a plaintiff may be at risk of suffering damages not monetarily compensable, the trial court retains authority to deny an injunction that appears inequitable because it would cause hardship or harm to the public. (Cots v. Ian Angeles County (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 282, 6. 292; Palo Alto -Menlo Park Yellow Cal Co, V. $anti Clara_ ounty Trgnsit Dist. (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 121, 132; see Civ. Code, S 34231 Code Civ. Proc., f 526.) In determining whether to issue an injunction, the court must consider the interests of third persons and of the general public. (Djy& v. gdy-Dix Ranch (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 589, 592.) With these considerations in mind, we detect no abuse of discretion. substantial factors support the trial court's decision to deny a permanent injunction. These include the political nature of the controversy; the apparent availability of other remedies for redress of any breach of appellants' contractual and statutory rights; the public interest in receiving the benefits of what the Commission has determined will be better transit service; the broad public interest in completion of a project intended partly as a temporary and novel experiment in transportation planning; the existence of ongoing legislative efforts to regulate and modify the relationship of RTD to the Commission (see Pub. Util. Code, 5 130051.8, which requires the two agencies to prepare a joint plan for their reorganization into a "unified comprehensive institutional structure") 1 and the fact the Commission, FT2, and RTD --the three entities directly participating in the new local transportation zone—have all agreed to its formation and operation. In the presence of these factors, even were we to uphold every contention of appellants in respect to construction and application of the public Utilities Code, we would still be 7. J unable to conclude that denial of a permanent injunction was, under all the circumstances of this case, an abuse of discretion. The judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondents. We concur: J.* KLEIN (Brett) Acting p.3. GATES ��t , J. NOTT I * Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. Foothill Transit Transaction Report 2/ 1/91 Through 3/31/91 FOOTHILL—All Accounts 4/4/91 Date # Payee Memo Category Amount EXPENSES Capital Costs 4694 2,734 2/28 91209 L.A. County/Comm. Service ------------- 2/22 91180 ATE/Ryder January Storage 4871 3,345 2/22 91182 ATE/Ryder December Storage 4871 3,345 2/22 91184 Chicorp March Lease Payment 4871 118,610 2/26 91207 Gillig balance of retention due 4871 10,022 2/22 91183 Chicorp Financial Service March Lease Payment 4871 61,836 Total Capital Costs 197,158 County Services --------------- 2/22 91198 L.A. County/Commission S1st/2nd Quarter FY/1990-91 4694 2,734 2/28 91209 L.A. County/Comm. Service 4694 1,594 Total County Services 4,328 Executive Board --------------- 2/22 91203 Henry Morgan January Board Meeting 4688 100 2/28 91179 Bob Bartlett January Meeting 4688 100 Total Executive Board 200 Insurance 3/28 91229 AOV Insurance Umbrella Coverage Renewal 4427 1,548 Total Insurance 1,548 Management Services ------------------- 3/5 91212 Forsythe & Associates January 1991 4701 52,422 3/27 91216 Forsythe & Associates Reimbursement for Insurance 4701 1,234 2/28 91210 Forsythe & Associates UCLA/Rose Bowl Supervision 4701 0 3/27 91223 Forsythe & Associates Reimbursement—signs for fai 4701 1,374 Total Management Services 55,030 Marketing 2/22 91185 Haskell Printing Company March Bus Passes 4524 815 2/22 91186 Haskell Printing Company April Bus Passes 4524 815 2/22 91187 Signs, Banners N' Balloon Balloons 4524 31 2/22 91188 GTE Directories January/February Advertisin 4524 84 2/22 91192 The Copy Center December Copies 4524 276 2/22 91194 Simpkin Design Revisions on Brochure 4524 193 2/22 91205 Signs, Banners n' Balloon Helium Refill 4524 13 2/22 91206 Los Angeles Times SG Valley Edition & Mailed 4524 42 2/27 91207 Inland Valley Bulletin Local Newspaper Subscriptio 4524 10 3/27 91220 American Public Transit A Classified Ad—RFP 4524 30 3/27 91221 American Public Transit A Subscription to Psgr.Transp 4524 65 3/27 91222 Business Yellow Pages listing for one year 4524 294 Total Marketing 2,667 Office Expenses 2/22 91190 GTE California January Telephone 3236 611 2/22 91191 Siesta Manufacturing Co., Office Furniture 3236 189 2/22 91193 Eastland Tower Partnershi AC January 3236 120 2/22 91195 GTE Directories Pomona/Rsmd. Advertising 3236 74 2/22 91196 MCI Telecommunications Long Distance 3236 342 3/4 91211 GTE California February Invoice 3236 732 3/27 91217 Pitney Bowes Postage Meter Rental 3236 107 3/28 91224 GTE California February/March Invoice 3236 1,409 Total Office Expenses 3,584 Operating Expense 3/7 91213 Embree Buses, Inc. January Invoice 4859 62,014 3/27 91218 ATE/Ryder Maintenance on LAVTA Buse: 4859 1,533 2/19 91177 ATE/Ryder December Contract Service 4859 122,386 2/22 91181 ATE/Ryder January Contract 4859 129,202 2/22 91197 ATE/RYDER Grand People — January 4859 413 3/7 91214 Embree Buses, Inc. L.A. County Faire Service 4859 40,887 3/7 91215 Embree Buses, Inc. United Way Shuttle 4859 1,081 3/28 91225 Embree Buses 492/494 November 4859 16,670 3/28 91226 Embree Buses 492/494 December 4859 18,016 3/28 91227 Embree Buses 492/494 January 4859 18,227 3/28 91228 Embree Buses 492/494 February 4859 16,354 3/27 91219 Laidlaw Transit January Service 4859 65,801 Total Operating Expense 492,584 TOTAL EXPENSES $757,099.31 Foothill Transit Zone Proposed Rules (Revised) As authorized by Section 4.A.(2) of the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, the Zone hereby enacts the following rules. 1. QUORUM A. Zone The quorum for meetings of the Zone shall be twelve (12) Zone members, or Zone alternates acting on the behalf of members. B. Board The quorum for meetings of the Executive Board shall be three (3) Board members, or Board alternates acting on the behalf of Board members. 2. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ZONE MEMBERS All financial contributions to the Zone made pursuant to Section 8 of the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement shall be voluntary on the part of the contributing City or County, and shall only be made after approval by the governing body of such contributing agency. 3. INSURANCE Zone shall require an adequate level of insurance, as determined by Board, from each contract provider of service. Zone shall also procure and maintain liability insurance for the Zone. 4. CLAIMS Zone adopts as a regulation pursuant to Government Code 935, relating to claim procedures, Los Angeles County Code Chapter 4.04. 5. BOARD MEMBERS A. Membership All members of the Executive Board shall be members of the Zone, not Zone alternates, and shall be ,-idents of the service area of the Zone. Board members may receive compensation for serving as members if the Zone so determines. Terms shall be three years and all Board members shall stand for appointment at the same time. Members shall hold membership on the Board during the term for which they are appointed and until their successors have been appointed, except that members may be removed from membership on the Board at any time for any reason by the appointing authority. One named alternate Board member shall be allowed per appointing authority. In the case of a vacancy in membership on the Board, the same shall be promptly filled by the appointing power. An appointment to fill a vacancy occurring during an unexpired term shall be for the period of the unexpired term. The appoint- ing powers shall forthwith notify the Secretary of the Board of all appointments. B. City Selection Board members from Cities shall be Zone members, chosen from within a cluster of Cities (as established in Exhibit A) by those Cities. Each City shall cast one vote for the Board seat within its cluster. One Zone member shall be selected as an alternate Board member from each cluster of Cities by those Cities. 6. OFFICERS Officers of the Zone shall be members of the Board. A. Transition Year For organizational purposes, the Board at its first meeting shall select officers of the Zone and Board. At the next Zone meeting, and at the first Zone -2- meeting in each succeeding calendar year, the Board shall nominate officers for ratification by the Zone as officers of the Zone and Board. B. Selection The Board shall select from its members a president and vice preside at its first meeting and thereafter in each succeeding calendar year the Board shall nominate or re -nominate its president and vice president. In the event that the president or vice president ceases to be a member of the Board, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next meeting of the Board held after each vacancy occurs. In the absence or inability of the president to act, the vice president shall act as president. The president, or in his absence the vice president, shall preside at and conduct all meetings of the Board and Zone. 7. ADMINISTRATIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE An Administrative Advisory Committee shall be comprised of the City Managers from the Cities represented on the Executive Board, along with the Chief Administrative Officer or Director of Public Works of the County. The purpose of the Administrative Advisory Committee is to advise the Executive Board on business matters related to the operation of the Zone and its impact on the political entities which comprise the Zone. 8. ROUTES, FARES AND SERVICE MODIFICATIONS Service modifications which affect less than 25% of the miles in a route, and less than 25% of the riders on a route may be determined by Board without approval by Zone. The Board shall notify all Cities and County of such modifications within thirty (30) days of Board approval. County and each City shall be notified in writing of any proposed service modification which affects 25% or more of the miles and riders in a route no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such change, unless such modification is adopted -3- as an emergency modification by Board, in which instance notice shall be given as soon as practicable. County and Cities shall notify Board in writing, with copy attached of the council action or board resolution, as to the objection to such modification. Failure to so notify Board will constitute affirmance of the proposed modification. If at least 33% plus one of the members of Zone object (in the form of a council action or board resolution) to any service modification which has been recommended by Board, that item shall be submitted to a vote of Zone. Approval of fares may be accomplished through approval of the annual budget by Zone, or by notification to Cities and County under the provisions above which apply to approval of service modifications. 9. CONTRACTING Zone shall contract for services to the greatest extent possible. THIS IS TO CERTIFY: That I am the duly -appointed, qualified and acting Secretary of the above- named Foothill Transit Zone and that the above and foregoing Proposed Rules was submitted to the membership at their first meeting held on May 4, 1988, was ratified by the vote of members entitled to exercise the majority of the voting power of said Zone. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this �� day of ��'�'�, 19g� (Name) :2)e -POX Secretary -4- Exhibit A CITY CLUSTERS CLUSTER CITY POPULATION* 1 Pomona 117,827 Claremont 35,996 San Dimas 29,594 La Verne 29,172 Total 212,589 2 West Covina 93,397 Glendora 43,177 Covina 42,473 Azusa 36,815 Total 215,862 3 Arcadia 49,254 Monrovia 33,552 Temple City 32,039 Duarte 21,104 Irwindale 1,060 Bradbury 914 Total 137,923 4 E1 Monte 93,852 Baldwin Park 62,188 Walnut 23,750 South E1 Monte 18,977 La Habra Heights 5,358 Industry 390 Total 204,515 * Source: State of California Department of Finance, May 1, 1987 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative C Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Ooeratina Expenses Express Lines 495 and 498 $787,187 $1,116.261 - Local Lines 178,185, 27416, 280 1,008,297 1,507, 663 - BSCP Lines 192194, 291193, 492, 494 - 1,321,424 Express Line 210 Express Local Line 187 - - - Express Lines 480181, 482 - - - I Total Operating Contracts € 51,795,484 ; 52,623,924 ' $1,321,424 I RTD Support Contract Ione Administration Total I 141,052 203,439 152.844 220,452 Expenses 52„089.380 ! 53,047,815 Capital Expenses Buses Required for Operations 9571,013 j $660,585 Buses Idled from Court Stay 0 Bus Lease Expenses I 5604.602 j 5660,585 I Total Exoenses 52,708.400 S2. i - I 579,373 + - j 5.579,373 112,977 I 29,453 1 122,423 106,450 556.824 i 5715276 i Revenues -Expenses 5526,490 $100.140 1(51,6 LACTC Additional Subsidy s0 s0 Net Revenues f $526,490 $100,140 j($1,619, ! i i - NEN ZONE SERVICE C' 2.5 15,960 - (6 Months) ! (6 Months) (12 Months) (12 Months) (6 Months) f (6 Months) 610,524 1,215,753 Main.z„n E:pand Operate Cperate Operate Routes f Operate Routes < 51.1,049,849 178,402 E.is+inq Existing 5SCP Foothill j 187, 480/1 j 187, 480!1 i Full j Service j Servicei Routes j 210 1 and 482 and 482 i Operation i Revenues Fare Box and Pass Revenue $1,290,945 151,879,013 1 9521,642 $429,165 $1,494,276 I $2,183,604 S7,798,645 i Proposition A Discretionary Funds 1,929.527 ! 1,929,527 0 ! 54,698 4,270,066 i 4,270,067 + 12,453,885 1 Proposition A Incentive Funds O I 0 0 'r 610,088 j 0 0 010,088 Total Revenue ' $3.220.472 1 $3,808544 ; 5521,642: 51.093.951 $5,764.342: $6,453,671: $20.862,5.18 ' Ooeratina Expenses Express Lines 495 and 498 $787,187 $1,116.261 - Local Lines 178,185, 27416, 280 1,008,297 1,507, 663 - BSCP Lines 192194, 291193, 492, 494 - 1,321,424 Express Line 210 Express Local Line 187 - - - Express Lines 480181, 482 - - - I Total Operating Contracts € 51,795,484 ; 52,623,924 ' $1,321,424 I RTD Support Contract Ione Administration Total I 141,052 203,439 152.844 220,452 Expenses 52„089.380 ! 53,047,815 Capital Expenses Buses Required for Operations 9571,013 j $660,585 Buses Idled from Court Stay 0 Bus Lease Expenses I 5604.602 j 5660,585 I Total Exoenses 52,708.400 S2. i - I 579,373 + - j 5.579,373 112,977 I 29,453 1 122,423 106,450 556.824 i 5715276 i Revenues -Expenses 5526,490 $100.140 1(51,6 LACTC Additional Subsidy s0 s0 Net Revenues f $526,490 $100,140 j($1,619, 179 53,349,4031' 0 ! 33 589 9 i 53,382.992 I 516.?9S.56-1 54,473.954 s0 1 4,473,954 I ;1-4Cr-91 April 4, 1991 - - 2.5 15,960 - - 1,321,424 j - - 579,373 6051"9 610,524 1,215,753 1,386,1241 2,127,767 3,513,891 57,991 X53' ;::52,738;2911:.:' < 51.1,049,849 178,402 237,574 902,8971 193.11^ 157,438 1,052,926 , 179 53,349,4031' 0 ! 33 589 9 i 53,382.992 I 516.?9S.56-1 54,473.954 s0 1 4,473,954 I ;1-4Cr-91 April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Procosition A Revenue Estimates Alternative C Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain E :fisting Seraca Service Rev Hrs. Rate/Hr Annual Amount -xcress :9,635 So7.91 51,333.x13 'ocai ;3,205 647.47 52,525.641 "Fatal Prop. A,0i=ebonary =3. -,E1.4 ESC? Lnes' Service Annual Amount Local / Exp Prop. A Funds so Tota.. SE} Line 210 Express— Service IIAnnual Amount .cress =roc. A Incentive S61 C.C88 . 8'% Ccntnb =roc. A Locat return .54.0 --- 8 -7- : scc"4,788 Operate Lines 187, 480/81 8.482 Service Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount zoress ! 102,469 s67.91 $6,958.670 Local 33,315 $47.4 51,So;,i63 Totai 7—Prop. A Discretionary $8,540,133 No Prop A Ciscrettonary or Incentive funds are identified for chis service. A joint pyo ;ocai contribution from corporate pass sales are identified for this service. .assumes La= =recas:tion A Incentive runbnc of S610,088. --- Aprii 4, 1991 LLI z 0 N CO 1 CO Z > cc ca Qi -J ) -j 0 cc c M LL 0 LL ccr� Ewa O co EC) co (0 CC) I C,3 c) wi CO I JR 10 April 4, 1991 W Z o rA I r: N � m r c � j .• U r I.LL m J a>. J _ O 0 , 0 n LL O Q M O N 1 tO C cq l c> I N I r- © p 1 O col (D Qf uT_ Q m Q I O U; Q) Q <D O <a r iv co T1N CA 171 I'm C4 ��I � m 1 -T c c : C rn C') " IaNi �j ` C N 1, c0 m LD N N N 04 M MI1- N1 NI c*J j M t II i I I I c7 rnI �- cD M OI .Eo m, © OI f\ c 41 C,4 r I M U7 : Q I 'o 69 EAI N NI j fA N3` I I I Lal I NI i (nI (D lil CA C)i c l �� cD N I O QM I . CSI at coco i I CO EA 671 1 69 M Mj�l c0 O1 I J N N cis �Irr�-� F- N to co (O N N co C) C i a C y N rI N Qr U 64 69 64 691 cocm cc co (M I M I j r j c0 rn �j F, of (D ri LO Q M LI i Ln (O (� 1 I m co EA 69 44I I69 69 M M N N W Q M I C (D N C N C rn O � � t - M .r Q C\1 I O IO Oj Q April 4, 1991 LLJ (n zN0 cn N '00 z W a m CL x LU Z .0 Cc co CV _j CD 0 0 0. >- — cz CZ O CL 0r 0 CZ LL 0 L.LF d cc M a 91 -5- April 4, 1991 (n C— x LLI 91 -5- April 4, 1991 W L—'j cz Z§ C cc cc C) C. a E O IT Z ---ii c17: Lq: a! 4 1r: c) E P.: C\j FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Picryl Yonr IQQl-q9 -- rT L, Cno 1z co to co tc� i MC6 oil i tx� CD f Lo 64 N co: cl q1 - OJ:: ir, C: C' Q: C" Cc 40 C cc. C, C "oo C' C\1 CC) CD C" CC 69. rA C a) 04 C- FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Picryl Yonr IQQl-q9 -- rT L, Cno 1z co to co tc� i MC6 oil i tx� CD f Lo 64 N co: cl q1 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Picryl Yonr IQQl-q9 -- rT L, Cno 1z co tc� i MC6 C11) yt cn- N co: q1 - OJ:: ir, C: C' Q: C" Cc cc. C, C) Lo FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Picryl Yonr IQQl-q9 C11) yt cn- (o co Cc cc. C) Lo "oo C' ' 49 CC 69. rA C a) 04 C- FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Picryl Yonr IQQl-q9 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt_ C Capital Budget Continued Fiscal Year 1991-92 (12 MONTHS) BSCP LINES ar Monthly Annual Lines Buses Months Amount Amount j 492,494 ; 12 314.000.00 $162,000.00 19Z/94, 291/93 15 12 S34,682-59 3416,191.08 ota! 22 S584,1.91.08 :...:. (6 MONTHS) EXPANDED SERVICE # of Monthly Annual Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount j i 5 24 6 360,000.00 3360,000.00 Tata! 24 $60=0.40 $360,000.00 -3- April4, 1991 Alternative C FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics �'NE Cc,. 1990 3 ,: --'1.04 131 1 . 8S 116 � Zone Express 1 Siam 191 '92 Peak Buses I 91 '92 Total Buses 15 } Date of Peak 1st 2nd Total 1st 2nd l Une Operation Buses 6 mts 6 mts Buses 6 mts 6 mts i 495 I ec. 1988 i 6 (i , .7 ' 3 98 2ec. ' 988 5 S c 7 i178 Aug. 1989 3 a 6� i a i 5 - '85 Aug.1989 ! 4 a 5! a a 6 j 2741276 Sept. 1989 5 5 5 5 5 8 I 280 Sent. 1989 3 3 5 4 4 6 Subtotal ( 45 j 46 53 j 50 I. 51 59 I 87 t July 1991 .180148, July 1991 - 25 482 Jan. 1992 - - f Subtotal 1 0 34 51 0} 38 57 I 486July 1992 488 July 1992 - - - - - - Subtotal 1 0'1 0.. 0 0 0 0 Subtotal ZONE JI4S..::.::80 Cc,. 1990 3 ,: --'1.04 131 1 . 8S 116 � Zone Express 1 30 55 74 33 61 82 I Local I 15 } 25 30 17 28 34 I SSCP i =92 Cc,. 1990 3 3 131 1 a a - igd Oct. 1990 3 3 3 45 I 921194 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 � - 291/293 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 32 ! 8 1 8 8 } Subtotal 1 18 T8 18 22 } 22 22 I 210 EXPRESS � i I 210 Expr. May 1991 j 9 9 9 10 I 10 10 i I � , GRAND •: TOTAL } 72. 107- 131 1 821 121. 1481 OTAL i Express 45 70 89 E50 j ( 78 99 i Local ! 27 I 37 42 I I 32 ! 43 a9 Foothill Transit Administrative Budget Fiscal Year 1991-92 Alternative A Staffing (With Annuaiizea Finance Asst.) Consultants FY91 I 413,336 1 70,0001 FY92 476.480 125.000' +/- $ 52,644 55,000 78.646 Subtotal $483,836 $601,480 117,644 24.3% Public Information 96,000 I 120,000 24,000 25.0% Insurance 3,0001 1,500: (1,500) -50.0% County Services 40,0001 40,000 0 0.00% Fiscal Audits 3,000 0' (3,000) -100.0% Office Lease 31,000 I 58,434 27,434 88.5% Office Expenses 12,000 I 18,000 6,000 50.0% Conferences & Membersnips 0' 14,000 14,000 N/A Mileage & Entertainment O; 10,000 10,000 N/A Executive Board 6,0001 6,000 i 0 0.0% Total $674,836 869,414, 194,578 28.8% -to- April 4, :991 Combined Alternative B Additions Budget Staffing 127,512" 603,9921 Consultants 15,0001 140,000 Subtotal $142,512 $743,9921, Public Information 24,000- 144,000 I Insurance 0 1,500 County Services 4,000 44,000 Fiscal Audits 0 0 Office Lease 0 58,434 Office Expenses 5,000, 23,000 Conferences & Memberships 0, 14,0001 Mileage & Entertainment 2,000 12,000 Executive Board 6,000 12,0001 Total $183,512 $1,052.926 -to- April 4, :991 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative B Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Revenues $787,187 1 NEW ZONE SGRVICE (6 Months) l (6 Months) € (12. Months) (12 Months) (6 Months) ! (6 Months) j Maintain f€ Maintain ( Operate 111e Operate Routes i( Operate Routes - Existing I Existing BSCF E Foothill 187, 480!1 E 1,87,480/1 Fuil Service Servica Routes 210 f and 482 and 482 i Operation Revenues $787,187 $818,365 - Fare Box and Pass Revenue 51,290,945 51,290,945 x;21,642 ; 5429,165 S1,d05,552 51,494.276 52,183,604 S7 ?10,577 Proposition A Ciscretionary Funds 1,929,527 1,929,527 0 54,698 - 1,270.066 4.270,067 1 12,453,885 Procosition A Incentive Funds 0 0 1 0 610,088 1 0 0! 610,088 i Total Revenue € $3,220,472 { 53,220,472 € $521,642 `; $1,093,951 1 $5,764,342 ; $6,453,671. € $20,274,550 Ooeratinv Expenses Express Lines 195 and 498 $787,187 $818,365 - - - - S1,d05,552 ,Local Lines 178,185, 27416. 280 1 1,008,297 1 1,019,961 - - - - 2.028,253 SSCP Lines 192194, 291193, 492, 494 - - ' 1,321,424 - - - 1,321,424 Express Line 210 Express - - - 579,373 1 - - 579,373 1 ;Local Line 187 - - - - 605,229 610,524 1,215,753 Express Lines 480/81, 4821 - - - - '86,'24 2,127,767 3,513,891 Total OperatingContracts I $1,795,484 $1,838,326 f 51.321,424 $579,373 51,991,.,''5,3 € $2,738,291 510,264,251 j IRTD Support Contract 141,052 141,052 112,977 29,453 178,402 237,574 840,510 Zone Administration 164,601 164,605 131,140 106,450 208,190 1 277,240 1,052,926 1 Total Operating Expenses 152,101,137 I $2,143,983 ! $1,566,241 { SI15,276 ! $2,377,90.4: $3.253,105: $12,157,687 1 Capital Expenses Buses Required for Operations $571,013 5571,014 5584,191 $378,675 $12,460 5699,050 ! 53:229,403 l Buses Idled `rom Court Stay 33,589 0 I 0 0 J 0 33,589 Bus Lease Expenses i $604,602 $571,014 It 5534,191: 5378,075 i 5425,460 i 3699,050 i 3,262,992 `otal- senses 52 '05.'39 52..'1.397 ' 52..50.4 2 S,092.951 S2.-'C2.4C5 52.952,155 515,120,679 Revenues -expenses x51 4,-33 x 05.47 (Sl,o'28,790)1 SOI 52,960?27 52,501.516 54,353.371 LACTC Additional Subsidv 50 SOI 30 $0 1 30 1 SO 50 Net Revenues E $514,733 { $505,475 i ($1,628,790)1 50 ; 52.960,937 [ $2,501,516 1 54,853,871 J1 -Apr -91 -ii- April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Prooesition A Revenue Estimates Alternative B Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain Existing Service Service 1 Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount i :Xpress 19,635 $67.91 $1,333,413 Local 1 53,205 $47.,'7 $2,525,641 Total:: Prop; A Di=eticnary $3,859,054 cSCP Lines' Service:Annual Amount: ! Local / Exp Prop. A Funds $0 1 Total., Line 210 Express" Service. I Annual Amount. :press =rop. A 'nc2ntive $c10,C8s SO/o Contrib Proe. A Local Return $Sd,698 iota€ € $oo"4,786 Operate Lines 187, 480181 & 482 Service Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount Express ! 102.469 587.91 $5,958,670 Local 33,315 $47.47 $1,531,463 Total .# . Prop. A Discretionary{ U,540,133 ' No Proo A Discretionary or Incentive funds are identified for this service. A bnt local ccntrnbution from corporate pass sales are identified for this service. ss .,as '—;C7, , .:ccsition A ;nc2ntive =,_,ncing or S01C,C88. -i Aprii 4, :a91 W O _ C1 F'cn m J Z CO Q Q: a. QM a: *- m J L Ri 6. 6. O � � o �LL m L 0 Cq Cn N I t� —4n O N Cq O m 1;; to N n I -RT cm V1 m OECD I(D CAIS Q CAI 4 CA cD ': N Q U, cD CAIN CA ��CJ1�N ISI Q+ i4l4403, �� 69,T 1691r Cf)I _ cD M , QI� N cn6o �rn T ,-0 (m cch (7)•ccs n I Q N�tt cD oo!U.,IC4 N N cliI iM c•JIN) !Nf j C14 'm co CD C) I T tD I � Co CA : ILO CAI i aD C r Q h N L7 X17 C v � u u C13 1 ! 1lUl +! cD Lo. I q m I ;moi I m i in iD t 0 C t ! cD N I. O C1 a 1 co cn i ISI Cc r -F . I44 � I I i tf L �1 O cn c) cD cc I 1 N N81 3 E IRSJ }-- �ItO N LO I FC"i 1 0 1 � N COI 17 rnt CO v1 N rTJ v 11, UI N NI I j 64 64 I 69 69! I N NI cD Q fc' f\ coI HiQ NI NI b cC I CO G7 M tDl III cc T I m cD �I c col �n� C (c f, m mI ISI 69 69I 169 691 i CA I cD cc I M m N NI x W � r ch II c m N et N I Q C rn rnJ -13- April 4. 1991 W O rr y mI J Z j 0�� C. Un a CC r m (D �, RS °' >. _j !E¢ O V a� CL 0 O L C� �O Ni,N t O . C) N E* I co co E c.q I N N .InI c+T u3 i - i C) � N NE J r1 0) 'S ftf M it O N{M O cDIC) N ^1 O y m o llao cn rn« v rn v V I U7 T (N IO C)f.3) N I M M -r rr ` 1M M r I C O 49 49 { 49 44 4%, !A r- A r 1 W 44 y Q c{({(ff I+1 c\n +' O 00 «$J. N I ya N NIIr IM MiI,r.E C'J jNI E r --'N m1 M� ; � I Q m c Ifs c= i MI N M (Q Q c` In :n i c I Ln tV (.4 Ki 'N CJ: i 69 Imo; CJ .DE r • .�. ;J; : M C) : O r i f f Lo co �I O Nf O 0)f cCf coi c0: '±I M 4^9 i 1 M cn m i 4a 1�f �'iC3 - NCLJ7 CO 1 0I N N 001 M 00 c , O H N S I N 'C' O O N c �. c0 E Q3-1 j69. .64. C j x !� c0 N co c01 100 01 M mr- r i c0 c0 I j h C) ,- 'fes �-• � O y) c0 r M I u7 f ui o ui ui 1 C6 c0 r- M M I v4 e4 v4 j 44 491 I I I t {y MMI N NI m i�i I 1 i i x W C N c 04 0 C (MF - c0 !J) s v N r' CC mi O Mi G j r N I I O f I Ii -1`1- April 4, 1991 W O W N c J i ZU U') CR GOA M T y L z co co 1 w Q > o T O cr- i co i � N U cm n Ij1n V)l a O CZ OI Q Co - N y Qi <A � CO c LL c� O LL I 1- U O - f.4 -iJ- O U7 C'i 44 April 4, :>9: i i ZU U') CR cr C'7 4 CM co I co ... Il_ n r. I itl I N y cn CO CO i 17, m U cm n Ij1n V)l 'I OI LnF l <A � CO tt] U� EH f 6H I ! 69 r I jrk 1 I 1 v tf) `U2 lJ1 ``` T [�1 V tQ�� C3 cot=j cc � i c itq �I 1 m04l {{11 yl r ' j a, °' ! , Q v�; 69 ; m I ! co Qi -iJ- O U7 C'i 44 April 4, :>9: i i ZU U') CR r as I= C i LcoU7 I ti y i Q � v � i yi cc c itq �I m (0 {{11 yl N -iJ- O U7 C'i 44 April 4, :>9: N x 1q, cl� Ir" co O co x (D C -j (v co: CO M, co: C-4: Ci:, a14.6r, "n C-) �cn Ln to Ln U3 C2 C) cz, �2 L6 ui ' a, 044" c•34& C m 0) ch co Gi5i lo co co LO a c LO (Ij fcu co a) F LO 1 Q4 10:1'. 031 = 00 001 OI 70 ; co Et CV) 04 C\j 4z! cr) CI) N cr) ai m co i F Lr) cli 3m- +21 Calcc co LE ca co ca ry N co 49 I 641 - 'o aO cm 'f C-0 C= I = w m cn 6 T C6 41 49. mJ m 14 CO --4 CO IT I Lo April 4, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. B Capital Budget Fiscal Year 1991-92 (1st 6 MONTHS) Maintain Existing Service (2nd 6 MONTHS) Maintain Existing Service of Monthly Mcnthiy Annual Scheduie Buses Months Amount Amount. 15 6 380.311.53 S181,369.48 i 5 6 330.311.68 3181,369.48 2 15 6 330.311.63 3181,869.48 3 30 6 358.452.4x 3350.714.64 4 30 6 560,157.90 3360,947.40 County Suses 12 6 324.000.00 314x.000.00 i otai r02 SLG3 2 3.5u $ ,219,401.00 i Operations' 99 $1,185,812 Idled 3 633,589 (2nd 6 MONTHS) Maintain Existing Service ' includes 10 buses oeerated by the 210 Exeress route at an annual cost or S37S,675, pws the :teat ass;gnee to 187. 48011, and 482 routes. of Monthly Annual Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount 15 6 380.311.53 S181,369.48 ., 3C 6 568.162.sx 3350.7's,ga 1 30 36C. 67.?C 3360,9x7.40 County Suses i 6 324.000.00 S1 x4, 000. C0 ctai 102 6203,2 3.50 6', 2'11 ,401.00 Operations' 102 51,219,401 ;aled 0 5o ' includes 10 buses oeerated by the 210 Exeress route at an annual cost or S37S,675, pws the :teat ass;gnee to 187. 48011, and 482 routes. FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE &, t. R Cacital Budcet Continued Fiscal Year 1991-92 (12 MONTHS) SSCP LINES of Monthiy Annuai Lines buses Months Amount Amount 492.194 7 12 514,000.00 5168.000.00 !192194.291/93 15 12 534,682.69 5416,191.08 Total 22. 548.652.59 $534,191.08 (6 MONTHS) EXPANDED SERVICE # of Monthly Annuai Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount j I 2 16 6 540.000.00 5240,000.00 Total 16 .::...:.......$40.000.00. $240,000.00 -i8- Apni 4, 199i Alternative B FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics ZCNE 45 H0 n7 i ::'S0 • .-& 108 { Start91 1 Express 1 '92 Peak Fuses ! '91 '92 Total Euses 1 61 80 ! Date of Peak 1st 2nd Tota! f Ist 2nd Line Operation Euses 6 mts 6 mts Buses 6 mts 6 mts X95 Dec. 1288 ' S I 15 15 I 17 � 17 17 s98 V ec. 1983 178 Aug. 1989 185 ! Aug. 1989 4 4 1 1) a a l 2741276 Sept. 1989 5 280 Sect. 1989 3 3 3 4 4 Subtotal 1 45 1 46 46 1 501 51 51 1 1 187 July 1991 - ; 9 9 - 10 ' 0 -I801481 Juiy 1991 - 25 30 - 28 33 482 Jan.1992- �... .subtotal j 0 ..34.. .51 0 38 57 � 486 Juiy 1992 486 July 1992 - subtotal j 0 1 0 0 0 j 0 0 subtotal ZONE 45 H0 n7 i ::'S0 • .-& 108 { Zone 1 Express 1 30 j 55 72 33 ! 61 80 ! 27 ! Local 1 15 25 25 17 ( 28 28 1 SSCP -192 Cc:. 1990 3 - - - 1 194 1 Cc:. 1990 191194 an. 1991 0 0" ^01/293 Jan. 1991 c o 6 I 3 8 3 Subtotal 1 18 1 18 18 1 221 2= 22I 210 EXPRESS 1 1 I 210 Expr. May 1991 1 9 9 2 10 I 10 10 GRAND TOTAL. 72 107 124 82 :1211 140 TOTAL 1 Express 45 1 70 87 I 5o 1 78 97 Local 27 ! 37 37 ( 32 ! s3 a3 -19- Apni 1 991 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative A Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 (12 Months) j (12 Months) 1 (12 Months) 3429,165 Maintain Operate Operate I Existing BSCr Foothill Fuil Service 1 Routes ( 210 Operation Revenues ;Fare Sox and Pass Pevenue 52,581.890 552',542 3429,165 53,532,697 Pr000sition A Discretionary Funas 3,859,054 0 54,698: 3,913,752 jPr000sition A incentive Funds 0 1 1,715,126 610,088 I 2,325,214_I i Total Revenue 4 $6,440,944 ; $2,236,768 $1,093,951. t $9;771,663 1 r1.. ..a;. C ..n , Express Lines 495 and 498 31,605,55'2 1 - - 31,605,552 Local Lines 178,185, 274/6, 280 j 2,028,258 - - 2,028,258 SSCP Lines 192/94, 291193, 492, 494 - 1,321,424 - 1,321,424 Express Line 210 Express - - 579,373 579,373 Total Operating Contracts j $3,633,810 $1,321,424 I $579,373 i $5,534,607 1 i RTD Support Contract 282,104 i 112.97 29,453 424,534 1 Zone Administration 544,788 1 218.176 106,450 869,414 Total Operating Expenses I $4,460,702 ! $1,652,577 i $715,276 1 $6,828,555 { I Capitai Excenses Buses Reouired for Ccerations 1,142,027 534.191 378.675 2,104.393 i Buses Iclea from Court Stav 918,1 G0 3 ?13,1 CC Bus Lease L.censas 52,060,127 r 5564,191. $373,076 1 53,02",992 Total EYoenses S6,520,329 52,236,768 S1 ,093,951 S9,951,548 !Revenues -Expenses (379,885) i 30 l57°,885) i 'L4CTC Additional Subsidv 579,885 30 30 579.885 ;Net Revenues E so 1 $0 i s0 ! 30 --0- .April 4, 1991 :;cthill Transit 77one Proposition A Revenue Estimates Alternative A Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain i is:ing Service Service j Rev Hrs RatelHr Annual Amount l Express 19,635 $67.91 $1,333,413 _ocai 53,205 847.-17 52.525,641 T = Flmp. A Disc etionary �3;$59;0�,� GSCP Lines' Service Annual Amount Local! Exp Prop. A incentive 81,773,531 j Total E $1;773,581 I ne 2.10 E.;cress'' Service Annual Amount -;cress Prop. A incentive 5o i C,C88 ;o! --ontrtb Proo. A Lccai r=eturn 85,1,698 Total it $604,786 No Proe A Discretionary funds are identified fcr this service. Assumes LACTC Proeosition A incentive P-.:ncino or 81,773,531. A ioint 5,Yo local contribution from corporate pass sates are icenafieo fer 'his sarJce. Assumes LACTC Proposition A Incentive Funding of 8610.088. 1- -kDril 4, 1991 toN Co D ,r � j m (.0 LO cn C14 In o f It AI C Itn ct -r u7 C Na O7: C'7 N to i -T E- to ' Com Cn I N ` �: rLal N r Q QtN � �m €�,: z �n O to N O: O CA 49. 69 i9 CA 69 t N n j 4.9 �^ 69 Wlif3 N Q I (G I '7 O E ) p Ch to E'e7C71 ! y (M N LO c7 4 M I ( m <D 17 ': r • : -�. r f7 1 i!7 I T rl ' it7 C C I c.^.. Wir�N r r tn�C1p!Im1 Z.;7,, I CD C m m O c II I u7 NI O C C C: € cc co ' y I cn m t CO Ln — N t I co J C I r (h t j CD u7 N c`7: Ln c' N G9 69, t ' :�} FA 69 6A • I 6A c'7 7 m O Qi ' I M 01 m CD I I O - N� Cmo M C; Q36:. m € !� L 1 I aA vi ifi 69 Rf I d' Qi W9. 69 E a rn I RI Z > o °� N 'f ° C,4 QQQQ�oI cI� CZW .3I 'inI U]IFa� m a J r"' O �_ •Cti CD Q1 NCIJ M CD m I m Q cli =CND r t17 Q r C�iC� Lr)l N y LL I �V CV) LL C) 'n r rn c'7 r. m Ca€ CD OI �T O O CI N) N_ coI Lr CO C r L7I 137 to I r r M Cl) ON 1 N O ' r Qi C7 er O to O C I m C*1 M O to C7 r, LO In 0.7E 49. 64 j 49 69 GH 691 J7 71 m co C•7 r I CO O r; I _ to I N N r C � (D 4 u7 CD co U-3Cry O I (M T co CO 1 F r I 4J 4J I I N -�2- April 4, 1991 W o m ` °'N C COI LO LO I C7 COI fA 641 ICD (D I N M T c J m C*71 Q T a I�1 ��f `V T �Y in w 3 O I C ccCL y N O cz lL m LLQ I 9 l _ i cT IO']1Q7 N N{rrEer IP O lo] O CD4�tCQ t� 0 OIco1 'D C.7 tLa ff j c l . 41 i `c! I <D 4) f CO E r N I 'F'C I ii <D LO f N I Q1 41 t 41 E CV C�7 I M `T Q!CA CO ir� QI }O 64 69 c 69 69C\j cc 64 i i9 r, 69 I f 44 I Frt L t7N r CD CJ) t an j G1[ CV N" 1 c7 ICO r7tF}N1 �NI 04 } M CO I co 0 I co a, I CDt MI I. �rn m41I ct Q I N r ri to iI N I t Lo Cn L } U') I 1 U i 64 69 L N N L { i 69 69 i i j C O LO iI, toI I I CD to : CO O.1 4 C; E m. � �0i i m i CD N E C CA i Cil �i co CO! I n ` (C � -A • (Q MCQI N Nr� Q N to m O I C , N N CD M 4i CA 1 Oct c I Ica y Nr� 1 I CV 'r7 I O Q r T Q c' I64OI U IN NI ii 64 64 ! I o4 63 I II i II <n N N CNl COI I� NI II rnI Icol -23- April 4, 1991 m ` ca r t ri o ca f� I 64 69I 1 Qf (P I C COI LO LO I C7 COI fA 641 ICD (D I �? COI eH I m C*71 m I�1 w 3 I C I X w C COI C 471 c C C4 IT C4 ✓� -J C c i0 :iM CD T NI Cl - Cl -23- April 4, 1991 LU Qi C O _ N J N r cn r 'O m r vNi ii ¢ O Q. QLU (_ .? r C i O r N NI IOI 0 n ccz FA L r L r, co I y N m C LU m m C C G c iC x HI -1 4- 4 April 4, 1991 rn N cn r Oil. NI IOI n u7(�I FA 6Fl Gil iH 44I ilk I i 11 LO Ln Lo T r T m m m !ml i i I co I ~ � N n IVcjco I 69i I icc MI i I m m 4F.� ( I mi 7"r ij - co `) N c}} c! ` CA ON � V i Ln i OI m cn ca cil 43 co I y N m C LU m m C C G c iC x HI -1 4- 4 April 4, 1991 rn N FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alternative A Capita! Budget Fiscal Year 10-91-92 McainLain F_dst-i c ��CniiC� Incudes 10 buses oceratea by the 210 Ezcress route at an annuai ;ease cost or 3378,675. -25- April 4, 1991 of -Monthiv Annual Schedule Buses Months. Amount Amount 1 15 12 530.311.53 3363,738.96 2 1 s ; 2 330.311.53 3363,738.96 3 30 12 .353,452.44 3701,429.28 4 30 12 360,157.90 3721,894.80 County 5uses 12 12 324.000.00 5288,000.00 TDiai 102 .. 5243233.0 'S ,43a,802.00 : Operations` 61 i 31,520,702 Idled 41 3918,100 BSCP Lines # of Monthly Annual Lines Suses Months Amount I Amount 492.104 7 12 314.000.00 5168.000.00 192194, 291193 15 12 33.1.382.59 3416,191.08 rcrai 22 S48,582-59 3554.191.08 Incudes 10 buses oceratea by the 210 Ezcress route at an annuai ;ease cost or 3378,675. -25- April 4, 1991 Alternative A FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics ZONE 91 '92 Start 91 '92 Date of Peak Peak I Total Total Line Operation Buses Buses j Buses Buses 495 ! Dec. 1988 15 15 ! 17 17 U98 Dec. 1988 18 15 1 178 Aug. 1989 - - 3 1 185 Aug. 1989 a 1 274/2'76 Sapt.1S8 280 Sept. 1989 3 Subtotal i 45 46 j 16 'S 1 4 50 51 187 - - i i 4801481,- s8G- Subtotaf: 0.- 0 0 0 486 — - - - - 488 Subtotal. 0. 0 J 0 0 j Subtotal tJNE..I 45 461 50.- 5; Zone Express 1 30 30 I 33 33 Locai 1 15 16 I l 17 18 I SSCP I -90 192(194 Jan. 1991 6 - - 2911293 ! Jan. 1991 6 6 8 9 1 1 Subtotat i 18 18 I 22 22 1 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. i May 1991 9 9 10 10 GRAND ; TOTAL 72 73- I 1 82 83 1 TOTAL i Express ( 45 45 j 50 50 Foothill Transit Foothill Transit Administrative Budget Assumptions 1. Roger Chapin is promoted from Deputy Executive Director to Executive Director, effective July 1, 1991. 2. Bill Forsythe will relinquish the position of Executive Director, but retain involvement as Management Advisor. Corporate support by Forsythe & Associates, Inc. is budgeted at 15 hours per week at the rate of $125 per hour. (Bill was budgeted at 50% time for FY 91, but actually contributed more than 100% of a normal work week to Foothill Transit.) 3. The salary and benefits package budgeted by Foothill Transit for the Deputy Executive Director, Roger Chapin, at $76,200 for FY 91 was insufficient to cover the Forsythe & Associates costs of $83,792 for this position. The FY 92 Foothill Transit budget for the Executive Director is based on Roger's actual FY 91 salary, plus a 5% increase, plus benefits. 4. Adel Santillan is budgeted in the Forsythe & Associates corporate support rate of $125 per hour, rather than as a direct Foothill Transit expense. A new administrative assistant will be hired for Foothill Transit. This is a net increase in direct and indirect administrative staff to support Foothill Transit. 5. A new Deputy Executive Director/Senior Analyst will be hired in conjunction with implementation of the next group of lines, after a favorable Appellate Court decision that allows their operation. An additional Operations Supervisor position will be added at the same time. 6. Direct expenses (such as office supplies, air travel, mileage, parking, postage, etc.) which were borne by Forsythe & Associates will be charged separately to Foothill Transit effective July 1, 1991. The Forsythe & Associates overhead rate (covering computer equipment, payroll processing, liability insurance, workers' comp insurance, office rent, supplies, cellular phone equipment and service charges, etc.) has been reduced from 15% to 12.5% on all costs. 7. The audit for FY 92 will be conducted and paid under the LACTC's evaluation of Foothill Transit. 8. Public Information programmed expenses will be increased by 25% in the base budget (Alternative A) over FY 91 for baseline operations. 9. An additional $50,000 will be spent on consulting services to perform line -by-line analyses, route modifications and other needs as determined by the Executive Board. -27- April 4, 1991 arl of '4 . 0. JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT - C BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITIES OF ARCADIA, AZUSA, BALDWIN PARK, BRADBURY, CLAREMONT, COVINA, DUARTE, EL MONTE, GLENDORA, INDUSTRY, IRWINDALE, LA HABRA HEIGHTS, LA VERNE, MONROVIA, POMONA, SAN DIMAS, SOUTH EL MONTE, TEMPLE CITY, WALNUT, and WEST COVINA CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE THIS AGREEMENT, dated the is entered into between the COUv- subdivision of the Sta* AZUSA, BALDWIN PAb, MONTE, GLENDORA, IN MONROVIA, POMONA, SA. and WEST COVINA, each California, (collective v o , '.ES.,- a political '.ES OF ARCADIA, DUARTE, EL 'GHTS, LA VERNE, CITY, WALNUT, State of Bin. W I WHEREAS, Cities _icy are empowered by law to plan, contract for and operate public transit services as authorized by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission's approval of the local transportation zone on December 2, 1987; WHEREAS, the County and Cities in the San Gabriel Valley are desirous of providing public transit service on a more cost effective basis in the area of the approved transportation zone; WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable for Cities and County to jointly exercise their common powers in the manner set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, Cities and County, for and in con- sideration of the mutual benefits, promises and agreements set forth herein, agree as follows: Section 1. PURPOSE AND BENEFITS. The Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the•Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 6500, hereinafter referred to as "Act") relating to the joint exercise of powers referred to in the above recitals. Cities and County each possess the powers referred to in the above recitals. The purpose of this Agreement is to exercise such powers jointly by planning, contracting for and operating public transit services as authorized by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission's approval of the local transportation zone to provide more cost effective service. Such purposes will be accomplished and said common powers exercised in the manner set forth in this Agreement. Section 2. TERM. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect for a period -2- of three years from the date service begins, unless continued for a longer term by an extension of the approval of the local transportation zone by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, provided that the term shall not expire until all Bonds, as that term is defined in Section 11 herein, are provided for and issued pursuant hereto and the interest thereon shall have been paid in full or adequate provision For such payment have been made as set forth in the proceedings for the issuance thereof, whichever date is earlier. Section 3. ZONE. A. Creation of Zone. Pursuant to the Act, there is hereby created a public entity, separate and apart from the parties hereto, -to be known as the "Foothill Transit Zone" (hereinafter referred to as "Zone"). The debts, liabilities and obligations of Zone shall shall not constitute debts, liabilities or obligations of either Cities or County. The Zone will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Cities and County for liability arising as a result of this Agreement. B. Zone Members. Zone shall consist of one elected city council member or mayor from each City and two members appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Each City may also select an alternate who is also an elected city council member or mayor from that City. No person who receives the substance of his/her income from another transit operating agency may sit on the Zone or Executive Board. -3- C. Board Members. Zone shall have an administrative entity, the Executive Board, composed of five members of Zone, each serving in his/her individual capacity as a member of the Executive Board. The Executive Board shall be called the "Zone Executive Board" (hereinafter referred to as "Board"). One member of the Board shall be a County appoir,�,ee. Four members shall be selected from the Zone members from the Cities according to rules which Zone may adopt. One named alternate may be selected for each Board member under rules which the Zone may adopt. D. Meetings of the Zone and Board. (1) Regular Meetings. Zone and Board shall provide for regular meetings; provided that the Zone shall hold at least 1 regular meeting in each year and the Board shall hold at least 1 meeting per quarter and there shall be such further meetings as a quorum of the Zone or Board may reasonably request depending upon the pressure of business. The dates upon which and the hour and place at which any regular meetings shall be held shall be fixed by resolution and a copy of such resolution shall be filed with Cities and County. The place of the regular meetings shall be within the Zone service area. (2) Ralph M. Brown Act. All meetings of the Zone and Board, including without limitation, regular, adjourned regular and special meetings, shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (commencing with Section 54950 of the Government Code of the State of California). -4- (3) Minutes. The Secretary of the Zone shall cause minutes of regular, adjourned regular and special meetings to be kept, and shall, as soon as possible after each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member of the Zone. (4) Quorum. Fifty percent plus one of the members present at a Zone or a Board meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that lesser number may adjourn for lack of a quorum. E. Secretary, Treasurer, Auditor and Counsel The Executive -Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall be and act as the Secretary of the Board. The County Treasurer shall be and act as the Treasurer of Zone, and the County Auditor -Controller shall be and act as the Controller of Zone. The County Counsel shall, on request, advise the Board in connection with any business relating to the Zone. The Board may employ other counsel to represent the Zone in any manner. Section 4. POWERS OF ZONE AND BOARD. A. Powers of Zone. (1) General Powers of Zone. Zone shall have the powers common to Cities and County set forth in the recitals of this Agreement, to wit: the power to plan, contract for and operate public transit services as authorized by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission's approval of the local transportation zone. Zone is hereby authorized to do all acts necessary for the exercise of said common powers, including, but not limited to, any or all of the -5- following: to make and enter into contracts, to acquire, construct, or to provide for maintenance and operation by contract, to maintain and operate any buildings, work, improve- ments, or facility, to acquire (by condemnation or contract), hold or dispose of property; and, with any required approval of Los Angeles County Transportation Commission to amend this Agreement and to annex to the Zone, to incur debts, liabilities or other a obligations which shall not constitute debts, liabilities or obligations of any party to this Agreement; to insure or obtain insurance for itself and all parties to this Agreement and to sue and be sued in its own name and to defend and hold harmless the parties to this Agreement. Said powers shall be exercised in the manner provided in said -Act and, except as expressly set forth herein, subject only to such restrictions upon the manner of exercising such powers as are imposed upon County in the exercise of similar powers. Zone may also issue Bonds as defined in Section 11 herein. (2) Rulemaking Powers of Zone Zone shall have the power to adopt and implement such rules and regulations as may be necessary to effect the purposes of this Agreement and which do not conflict with any terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to the power to determine qualification and compensation, if any, of Board members, to determine the procedure for selection of Board members representing cities, their terms, their alternates, if any, and related requirements, to select officers of the Zone not provided for in this Agreement, and to adopt rules relating to fares, 19-M routes, and service modifications including the delegation of specified powers relating to fares, routes and service modifications to Board. B. Powers of Board. Board shall have the power to adopt and implement such rules and regulations as may be necessary to effect the purposes of this Agreement and which do not conflict with any terms of this Agreement or rules of Zone, including but not limited to the power to select officers and their terms and related requirements, to establish committees advisory to the Board and the power to adopt parliamentary rules. Section 5. ROUTES, FARES AND SERVICE MODIFICATIONS. Board shall recommend fares and routes and -service modifications to Zone subject to such rules as Zone may adopt. Section 6. FISCAL YEAR. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Fiscal Year" shall mean the period from July 1 of each year to and including the following June 30. Section 7. PAYMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT. Zone shall, upon request, pay or reimburse Cities or County for reasonable expenses incurred and payments made by Cities or County in connection with the administration of the Zone. Zone specifically agrees to reimburse County as soon as possible for buses which County provides, with interest rates and such other terms as may be mutually agreeable. Section 8. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION. During the initial three years of this Agreement, County shall meet T.ns AncplPc rnunty Tranannrtt!ar;^.,..- During the initial three years of this Agreement, County shall meet Los Angeles County Transportation Commission's requirement to provide five percent (5x) of the operating budget. If the Zone is required to provide a portion of its operating budget beyond the initial three years, Cities and County may provide funds or assign programs which meet Los Angeles County Transportation Commission eligibility criteria to fulfill such requirements. Section 9. OPERATIONS. Zone shall operate in accordance with the operations plan and implementation program approved by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission on December 2, 1987 and as may be amended from time to time by the Commission. - Section 10. ASSISTANCE TO ZONE. Cities and County may in appropriate circumstances: (a) Make contributions from their treasuries for the purposes set forth herein, (b) make advances of public funds for such pur- poses, such advances to be repaid as provided herein, or (c) use their personnel, equipment or property in lieu of other contribu- tions or -advances. The provisions of Government Code Section 6513 are hereby incorporated into this Agreement. Section 11. BONDS. In order to obtain the funds required to finance acquisition and construction of facilities and vehicles, including necessary reserves and incidental expenses, Zone may issue Bonds. The term "Bonds" means bonds or other evidence of indebtedness as authorized by the Act including but not limited to revenue bonds, bond anticipation notes, certificates of participation, lease purchase agreements or other evidences of indebtedness. The power of the Zone to issue such Bonds shall only be exercised upon the authorization of Cities and County. Such Bonds may be issued in more than one series, shall be sold by competitive bidding or by private sale, to the extent permitted by law, and shall not constitute a debt, liability or obligation of either Cities or County. Any resolutions authorizing the issuance of such Bonds shall be subject to the approval of County and Cities. The services of bond counsel, financing consultants and other consultants and advisors may be used by Zone in connection with the issuance and sale of such Bonds. The fees and expenses of such counsel, consultants and advisors shall be .paid from the proceeds of the Bonds, and Cities or County may be reimbursed from such proceeds for any portion of such fees and expenses which it has paid prior to the issuance of such Bonds. Section 12. ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS. To the extent not covered by the duties assigned to any trustee appointed under any resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds by Zone, the Controller of Zone, shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice or by the provisions of any resolution authorizing the issuance of Bonds by Zone. The books and records of Zone in the hands of the trustee or the Controller shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by representatives of Cities and County and Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. The Controller of Zone, within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year, shall give a complete written report of all financial activities for such fiscal year to Cities, County and Zone to the extent such activities are not covered by the report of any trustee. Any trustee appointed under any resolution or indenture authorizing the issuance of Bonds by Zone shall be required to establish suitable funds, furnish financial reports and provide suitable accounting procedures to carry out the provisions of said resolution and this Agreement. Additionally, the Treasurer of Zone shall assume the duties (to the extent not covered by the duties assigned to any trustee) required by the laws of the State of California, including the duties described in Section 6505.5 of.the Government Code or as said Section may be amended. Section 13. FUNDS. The Treasurer of Zone shall have the custody of and disburse Zone funds pursuant to the accounting procedures developed in accordance with the provisions of Section 11 hereof and as nearly as possible in accordance with normal County procedures. - The public officers (namely, the Controller and Treasurer) herein designated as the persons responsible for any moneys of Zone are hereby also designated as responsible for all other property of Zone as required by Government Code Section 6505.1. The parties to this Agreement hereby find and determine that the Controller shall be liable on his official bond in the amount of $50,000 and the Treasurer shall be liable on his official bond in the amount of $300,000. -10- Section 14. DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS. Upon the termination of this Agreement, all property of Zone shall vest in the respective parties to this Agreement which theretofore transferred, conveyed or leased said property to the Zone. Any other property, funds and assets of the Zone shall be returned to the Cities or County in proportion to their contributions. Section 15. WITHDRAWAL FROM ZONE. Cities and County, pursuant to the Transportation Zone Guidelines of Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, have agreed to support Zone for a minimum of one year once service has been initiated. After one year, Cities and County may withdraw from Zone subject to the following conditions and• whatever additional conditions Zone may adopt: 1) that withdrawal from Zone requires a minimum 120 day notice and 2) withdrawal from Zone requires acknowledgement that Southern California Rapid Transit District/Los Angeles County are not required to provide replacement service. Section 16. NOTICES. Notices hereunder shall be sufficient if sent by regu- lar mail, postage prepaid, to the City Managers of each City at: ARCADIA: 240 W. Huntington, Box 60, Arcadia, CA 91006 AZUSA: 213 E. Foothill Boulevard, Azusa, CA 91702 BALDWIN PARK: 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 BRADBURY: 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91010 CLAREMONT: P.O. Box 880, 207 Harvard Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711 COVINA: 125 E. College Street, Covina, CA 91722 DUARTE: 1600 Huntington Drive, Duarte, CA 91010 -11- EL MONTE: 11333 Valley Boulevard, Box 6008, E1 Monte, CA 91734 GLENDORA: 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91740 INDUSTRY: Box 3366, Industry, CA 91744 IRWINDALE: 5050 N. Irwindale Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91706 LA HABRA HEIGHTS: 1245 N. Hacienda Boulevard, La Habra Heights, CA 90631 LA VERNE: 3660 "D" Street, La Verne, CA 91750 MONROVIA: 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, CA 91016 POMONA: P.O. Box 660, 505 South Garey Avenue, Pomona, CA 91769 SAN DIMAS: P.O. Box 307, 245 E. Bonita Avenue, San Dimas, CA 91773 SOUTH EL MONTE: 1415 N. Santa Anita Avenue, South E1 Monte, CA 91733 TEMPLE CITY: 5938 N. Kauffman Avenue, Box 668 Temple City, CA 91780 WALNUT: 21201 La Puente Road, Box 682, Walnut, CA 91789 WEST COVINA: P.O. Box 1440, West Covina, CA 91793 COUNTY: Executive Officer - Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Room 383 Hall of Administration Los Angeles, California 90012 ZONE: Executive Officer - Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Room 383 Hall of Administration Los Angeles, California 90012 Section 17. MISCELLANEOUS. The section headings herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing the language in the section referred to. Whenever in this Agreement any consent or approval is required the same shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of such state and is to be so construed. -12- Where reference is made in this Agreement to Controller or Treasurer indicating specific duties to be undertaken by said officers, said officers may independently determine which of them shall undertake any particular duty. Section 18. SEVERABILITY. Should any part, term, portion or provisions of this Agreement be by the courts decided to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining parts, terms, portions of provisions shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected thereby, provided such remaining por- tion or provisions can be construed in substance to continue to constitute the Agreement that the parties intended to enter into in the first instance. Section 19. SUCCESSORS. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized, their official seals to be hereto affixed, as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BOARD OF PERVISORS By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: AB J MON LH, Executive Officer rd f S,�ipe visors i 217) Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: ADOPTED r SUPERVISORS w.. N iY OF LOS ANGELES DE WITT W. CLINTON 171 MAR 22I County Counsel By LARRY J. MONTEILM Deputy EXECUTIVE OFFICER CITY OF ARCADIA Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK / By tX� Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY i hereby certify that purouant to Section 25103 o� the Governnent Code, d e l i v em � v P + ti. ; CITY OF AZUSA CITY OF BALDWIN PARK By Mayor v" ATTEST: CITY CLERK By , , fes, Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By J�4tel/ Deputy CITY OF BRADBURY AST CITY ,CLERK 1 , , (� By - Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By s/s Robert L. Kress Deputy CITY OF CLAREMONT By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF BRADBURY By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF CLAREMONT By_ r� r �--_� May ATTES -� CITY CLERK By Clerk /7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Y CITY OF COVINA By Mayor ATTEST: CITY RK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Z l p Assistant CITY OF DUARTE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -17- CITY OF COVINA By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF DUARTE \1 By �' % Z Mayor A T�E S'T : CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy - 17- CITY OF EL MONTE By .,\ Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK BY - Clerk, 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY LJBY - —8 Deputy CITY OF GLENDORA By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk -- - - — - — ST.%TE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL MONTE ) I, Kathleen Kaplan City Cleric of the City of E1 Monte, California, to be a true and correct copy of the Joint Exercise of Powers do hereby certify this Agreement between the county of Los Angeles, the cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Irwindale, La Habra, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina, Duarte, E1 Monte, Glendora, Industry. Walnut, and West Covi La Verne, Monrovia, Pomona, San Dimas, South El Monte, Temple Adotted by the E1 Monte City creating an agency to be known as the FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE. p Council at a Adjourned Regular Meeting held on April 5, 1988.! o Kathleen Kaplan, City Clerk El Monte, California CITY OF EL MONTE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF GLENDORA By�4 - i Mayer C ATTEST: r`TTV rT V107 I_] APPROVED AS.TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY � nn By Dep ty CITY OF INDUSTRY By- c . it - Mayor ATTI' T CITY CLERK By- T ' tet' Z�?" fit /✓ Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTO,R�IEY By - Deputy CITY OF IRWINDALE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -19- CITY OF INDUSTRY By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF IRWINDALE By r Mayo ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Deputy CITY OF LA HABRA HEIGHTS By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By N G APPROVED AS TO Fflerk/T M: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF LA VERNE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -20- CITY OF LA VERNE By AT CITY CLERK Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF LA VERNE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -20- CITY OF MONROVIA /I By I Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK -? Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF POMONA By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -21- CITY OF MONROVIA By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF POMONA By ��1/�A 1� Mary o/v ATTEST: CITY CLERK By V Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY AT ORNEY By -21- CITY OF SAN DIMAS ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Y � e t CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -22- CITY OF SAN DIMAS By ATTEST: CITY CLERK Mayor By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE By SGC Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK B04E-=4, Cle t k AFPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Dy -22- CITY OF TEMPLE CITY By May crr ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By -m— .1 CITY OF WALNUT By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -23- CITY OF TEMPLE CITY By ATTEST: CITY CLERK Mayor By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy CITY OF WALNUT ATTEST: CITY CLERK ' � I by � 1 Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By Deputy -23- CITY OF WEST COVINA B y i�-'lMr� ; -4 Mayor l ATTEST: CITY CLERK By Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By -- Deputy -24- FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE 1992-1994 Short -Range Transit Plan j s (A March 29, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 ALTERNATIVE 1 PROPOSAL..................................................................................................... 1 LACTC Required Tables for Alternative 1 .......................................... ............. 1 ALTERNATIVE2 PROPOSAL...........................................................................................I....... 1. 2 LACTC Required Tables for Alternative 2.................................................................. 2 OTHER ELEMENTS APPLICABLE TO BOTH ALTERNATIVES ............................................... 3 PROJECTED END -OF -YEAR BALANCES................................................................................. 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Alternative 1 Scenario Bus Fleet Requirement.......................................................... 4 Alternative 1 Scenario Vehicle Service Hours........................................................... 5 Alternative 1 Scenario Vehicle Service Miles............................................................ 6 Alternative 1 Scenario Boardings............................................................................... 7 Alternative 1 Scenario Revenues................................................................................ 8 ATTACHMENT 2 Alternative 2 Scenario Bus Fleet Requirement.......................................................... 23 Alternative 2 Scenario Vehicle Service Hours........................................................... 24 Alternative 2 Scenario Vehicle Service Miles............................................................ 25 Alternative 2 Scenario Boardings............................................................................... 26 Alternative 2 Scenario Revenues................................................................................ 27 ATTACHMENT 3 PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION POLICY............................................................ 42 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE ALTERNATIVE 1 L-1 Current Fare Structure — Alternative 1............................................................................ 9 L-2 Current Fleet Inventory — Alternative 1........................................................................... 10 L-3 Historic Fleet Characteristics — Alternative 1................................................................. 11 L-4 Projected Fleet Characteristics — Alternative 1.............................................................. 12 L-5 Projected Financial Status — Alternative 1..................................................................... 13 L-6 TPM/TDA Reporting Form — FYI 989-90, Actual — Alternative 1........................................................................... 14 FYI 990-91, Estimated — Alternative 1..................................................................... 15 FYI 991-92, Proposed — Alternative 1..................................................................... 16 FYI 992-93, Planned — Alternative 1........................................................................ 17 FYI 993-94, Planned — Alternative 1........................................................................ 18 L-7 Grants Monitoring Form — Alternative 1......................................................................... 19 L-8 Performance Audit Follow-up Actions — Alternative 1 ................................................... 20 L-9 Impact of Federal Fund Loss — Alternative 1................................................................. 21 L-10 Capital Project Descriptions and Justification.............................................................. 22 ALTERNATIVE 2 L-1 Current Fare Structure — Alternative 2............................................................................ 28 L-2 Current Fleet Inventory — Alternative 2........................................................................... 29 L-3 Historic Fleet Characteristics — Alternative 2................................................................. 30 L-4 Projected Fleet Characteristics — Alternative 2.............................................................. 31 L-5 Projected Financial Status — Alternative 2..................................................................... 32 L-6 TPM/TDA Reporting Form — FYI 989-90, Actual — Alternative 2........................................................................... 33 FYI 990-91, Estimated — Alternative 2..................................................................... 34 FYI 991-92, Proposed — Alternative 2..................................................................... 35 FYI 992-93, Planned — Alternative 2........................................................................ 36 FY1993-94, Planned — Alternative 2........................................................................ 37 L-7 Grants Monitoring Form — Alternative 2......................................................................... 38 L-8 Performance Audit Follow-up Actions — Alternative 2 ................................................... 39 L-9 Impact of Federal Fund Loss — Alternative 2................................................................. 40 L-10 Capital Project Descriptions and Justification.............................................................. 41 FY 1992-1994 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN INTRODUCTION This updated Foothill Transit Zone (FTZ) Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is for the period starting on July 1,1991 and extending through June 30, 1994. Due to pending litigation, the actual calendar for the phased implementation of the original zone package is not precisely known. Hence, two separate service assumptions were used for the planning period starting on July 1, 1991 (start of FY92) and extending through the end of FY 94. This submittal presents the two resulting, distinct alternatives, respectively called Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Given below is a summary description of each alternative with supporting 3 -year projections of bus fleet plans, service levels, ridership, operating costs and revenues, as well as administrative costs. For clarity, a full set of required LACTC tables is enclosed for each alternative. ALTERNATIVE 1 PROPOSAL This alternative assumes keeping current service levels constant on the existing FTZ routes. The only exception is local route 178, for which one more coach would be added in July 1991, so as to improve schedule reliability. Other services managed by the FTZ, consisting of the BSCP routes previously managed by the County of Los Angeles, would remain at constant levels, requiring the same 22 coaches as presently needed. In addition, this alternative assumes the May 1991 start up of one new express route 210 along the Foothill Freeway corridor. This service expansion would use ten of the existing Zone buses, which are not presently assigned to the active fleet. Overall, this proposal would result in a total fleet size of 124 buses, which would include 73 peak period buses. Attachment 1 gives the detailed projections of peak buses, total buses, annual service hours and miles, annual boardings and farebox revenues for each route proposed under this alternative. While fleet size, hours and miles are held constant past July 1,1991, a 5 percent annual increase was applied to both the boardings and operating revenues. LACTC Required Tables for Alternative 1 L-1 Fare Structure: This is shown same as current in FY 92 and each future year. L-2 Current Fleet Inventory: The total fleet size has 124 buses, including the 22 buses for the BSCP lines. L-3 Historic Fleet Characteristics: L-4 Proiected Fleet Characteristics: The fleet spare ratio is kept constant at 14 percent among the local and express services. L-5 Proiected Financial Status: Operating revenues assume a 5 percent increase in farebox revenues, solely from growth in ridership, and a stable influx of Proposition A monies. The FY 92 discretionary fund returns are based on $67.91 per express vehicle service hour and $47.47 per local vehicle service hour. The BSCP service operating costs would be offset by Proposition A Incentive Funds. -1- L-6 TPM/TDA Reporting Forms: A total of five tables, one for each fiscal year reported (FY 1990 to 1994) are enclosed. L-7 Grants Monitoring Forms: No grants in progress, not applicable. L-8 Performance Audit Follow up: Not applicable. L-9 Impacts of Federal Fund Loss: The Zone has agreed to share in the loss of LACTC funding if federal operating funds are lost to Los Angeles County. The expected savings (once the Zone becomes permanent) are sufficient, so that there would be no impact on the proposed services. The Zone would also have the option to raise fares and/or decrease services to stay within the funding constraints. L-10 Capital Project Justification: No capital project assumed for this alternative, not applicable. ALTERNATIVE 2 PROPOSAL This alternative contains both growth in the existing FTZ routes and phasing of new services in line with the approved zone application. Service increases on express routes 495 and 498 would occur on January 1, 1992, July 1, 1992 and July 1, 1993. Service increases on local routes 178, 185, and 280 would only occur once, on January 1, 1992. The new zone service elements assume a favorable court decision to be made by June 30, 1991. Based on this expected, near-term resolution, the balance of the original zone package would be implemented with a revised schedule. The first new zone routes 187, 480 and 481 would begin on July 1, 1991; and route 482 would then be added on January 1, 1992. The remaining routes 486 and 488, completing the original zone package, would be phased in on July 1, 1992. Assumptions for other services, i.e. BSCP lines and the new 210 express, are identical for Alternatives 1 and 2. Overall, this alternative would require 24 more buses in 1992, 33 more buses in 1993, and 5 more buses in 1994. Attachment 2 gives the detailed projections of peak buses, total buses, service hours and miles, boardings and farebox revenues for each route. In the first fiscal year, a finer breakdown is shown by six-month intervals to follow the change in service at mid -year. In addition to the projected increases in hours, miles and coaches, a year to year increase of 5 percent was also built into boardings and farebox revenues. Ridership gains due to proposed service increases were assumed to match historical productivity levels. LACTC Required Tables for Alternative 2 L-1, L-2, L-3: These are identical to the above versions for Alternative 1. L-4 Projected Fleet Characteristics: This table gives the phased expansion of the fleet, starting in January 1992. Earlier service changes would be implemented with coaches, already available. The projected spare ratio would be stable at 13 percent overall. L-5 Projected Financial Status: The FY 92 discretionary fund returns are based on the same values by service type as for Alternative 1. The additional savings achieved by transferring new routes to the zone would enable to support the BSCP costs without needing any additional Proposition A Incentive funds in FY 92. L-6 TPM/TDA Reporting Forms: A total of five tables, one for each fiscal year reported, is given with proposed increases above the Alternative 1 version starting with FY 92 (1991-1992). L-7, L-8, L-9: These are identical to Alternative 1. - 2- L-10 Capital Project Justification: The zone receives approval from the LACTC before any buses are acquired. As was stated earlier, 24 new buses will need to be ordered and delivered by the fall of 1991. OTHER ELEMENTS APPLICABLE TO BOTH ALTERNATIVES Private Sector Involvement: This element was already submitted to the LACTC in early March. A copy is attached to this package. Accessible Service Provisions: The Zone has already adopted the policy of providing fixed route services with fully accessible buses on all its lines. The current Zone fleet consists of fully accessible coaches equipped with wheelchair lifts as well as radios and air conditioning. Future compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) will be incorporated into the current policy. This should occur as soon as the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board issues more detailed guidelines, expected by the end of April 1991. As a result of this new legislation, the Zone will likely contract with special, paratransit service providers in the San Gabriel Valley; the steps to be taken will be defined in agreement with regional SCAG guidelines, once these are formally updated to comply with the new Federal requirements. Air Quality Conformance: The Zone will comply with the new Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) emission standards, per the recent State of California Air Resources Board (CARE) regulations. These standards apply to any new coach purchased after January 1, 1991. There is no fleet expansion proposed for Alternative 1. The new standards do apply to the fleet expansion planned for Alternative 2. Starting in FY/92, the new coaches required for the Alternative 2 service plan (see Table L-4) shall fully comply with the new CARB regulations, including the proper use of particulate traps as required. Another option would be to acquire methanol -powered vehicles instead of diesel - powered ones. Yet, in view of the fairly small fleet increments and the somewhat unique maintenance aspects of methanol, that option appears less attractive for the Zone. Similar Federal Clean Air Act standards for TSP emmissions will become effective on January 1, 1993. By complying with the State mandate, the Zone will have already assured future compliance with the . Federal standards. More stringent standards, expected to become effective on January 1, 1995, go beyond the time frame of this SRTP (June 30, 1994). PROJECTED END -OF -YEAR BALANCES i Estimated revenues compared to expenses taken from the Table L-5 projections for each alternative are summarized below. REVENUES MINUS EXPENSES (in thousands of dollars) Fiscal Year Alternative I Alternative 2 FY90 (1989-90) $ 23.9 $ 23.9 FY91 (1990-91) (586 ?) (586.2) FY92 (1991-92) (79.8) 4,473.9 FY93 (1992-93) (193.8) 4,887.3 FY94 (1993-94) (307.5) 3,739.2 The Zone has entered into an oral agreement with the LACTC whereby up to $5,000,000 will be loaned to the Zone temporarily to assist in the payment of bus leases included in these expenses. This agreement eliminates any deficits that do occur. The Zone received the first $923,600 of this loan during the year ended June 30, 1990. Repayment of this loan will be deferred until the Zone fully implements service approved by LACTC. ATTACHMENT 1 SRTP Alternative 1 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Buses FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Start Date of Operation '91 Peak Buses '92 Peak Buses '93 Peak Buses '94 Peak Buses 495 Dec. 1988 15 15 15 15 498 Dec. 1988 15 15 15 15 178 Aug. 1989 3 4 4 4 185 Aug. 1989 4 4 4 4 2741276 Sept. 1989 5 5 5 5 280 Sept. 1989 3 3 3 3 Subtotal 45 46 46 46 187 -- - - - - 480/481 -- - - - - 482 -- - - - - 16 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 488 -- - - - - - '94 Total Buses Subtotal 0 0 0 0 191 Total Buses '92 Total Buses '93 Total Buses '94 Total Buses 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 50 51 51 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal ::ZONE 45. :::: 46 .:..: .46 :: 46 4 4 4 4 :.::50 : .:.. :.51 .:. 51 51 Zone Express 30 30 30 30 6 33 33 33 33 291/293 Local 15 16 16 16 8 8 8 8 1 22 22 22 22 17 18 18 18 BSCP Oct. 1990 3 3+ 3 3 4 4 4 4 492 494 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 192/194 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 291/293 Jan. 1991 Subtotal 6 18 6 18 6 18 6 18j 8 8 8 8 1 22 22 22 22 32 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 GRAND '. -.TOTAL.. 83 TOTAL Express 45 45 45 45 50 50 50 50 Local 27 28 28 28 32 33 33 33 ATTACHMENT 1 SRTP Alternative 1 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Vehicle Service Hours FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Stan Date of I Operation 191 Annual VSH '92 Annual VSH '93 Annual VSH '94 Annual VSH 495 Dec. 1988 11,892 11,892 11,892 11,892 498 Dec. 1988 13,124 13,124 13,124 13,124 178 Aug. 1989 10,404 11,444 11,444 11,444 185 Aug. 1989 11,756 11,756 11,756 11,756 274/276 Sept. 1989 17,696 17,696 17,696 17,696 280 Sept. 1989 14,689 14,689 14,689 14,689 Subtotal 79,561 80,601 80,601 80,601 187 -- - - - - 480/481 - - - - - 482 -- - - - - 2,243 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 488 -- - - - - - 2,496 Subtotal 0 0 :0 Q Subtotal ZQNE:;�'79;5&t:::° 1,872 2,496 Zone Express . 25,016 . 25,016 1 25,016 25,016 2,243 Local 54,545 55,585 55,585 55,585 BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 1,872 2,496 2,496 2,496 494 Oct. 1990 1,682 2,243 2,243 2,243 192/194 Jan. 1991 6,846 13,692 13,692 13,692 291/293 Jan. 1991 6,924 13,848 13,848 13,848 Subtotal 17,324 32,279 32,279 32,279 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 1,295 8,415 8,415 8,415 GRAND TOTAL ::.98,i8Q;-,<::<121,295:::. 121,295<t�u121,295 TOTAL Express 29,865 38,170 38,170 38,170 Local 68,315'. 83,125 83,125 83,125 ATTACHMENT 1 SRTP Alternative 1 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Vehicle Service Miles FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Start Date of Operation 191 Annual . VSM '92 . Annual VSM '93 Annual VSM '94 Annual VSM 495 Dec. 1988 411,463 411,463 411,463 411,463 498 Dec. 1988 374,953 374,953 374,953 374,953 178 Aug. 1989 182,486 200,728 200,728 200,728 185 Aug. 1989 201,733 201,733 201,733 201,733 2741276 Sept. 1989 183,872 183,872 183,872 183,872 280 Sept. 1989 204,471 204,471 204,471 204,471 Subtotal 1,558.978 1,577,220 1,577,220 1,577,220 187 -- - - - - 480/481 - - - - - 482 - - - - - 786,416 786,416 Subtotal 0, 0 0 0 488 - - - - - - :'.1; 577;220 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 Subtotal : t- -ZONE > 1 558;97..$ :'.1; 577;220 n x : $7 220::' . t .577 220, Zone Express 786,416 786,416 786,416 786,416 91,290 Local 772,562 790,804 790,804 790,804 BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 73,058 97,410 97,410 97,410 494 Oct. 1990 68,467 91,290 91,290 91,290 192/194 Jan. 1991 130,688 261,375 261,375 261,375 291/293 Jan. 1991 185,768 371,535 371,535 371,535 Subtotal 457,981 821,610 821,610 821,610 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 25,791 167,640 167,640. 167,640 GRANDrOTAt , 2,042;750.:>:2;566.470 :.: 2,566.470....2,566.470.: TOTAL Express 953,732 1,142,756 1,142,756 1,142,756 Local 1,089,018 1,423,714 1,423,714 1,423,714 ATTACHMENT 1 SRTP Alternative 1 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Boardings FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Start Date of Operation 191 Annual Boardings '92 Annual Boardings '93 Annual. Boardings '94 Annual Boardings 495 Dec. 1988 338,619 355,550 373,327 391,994 498 Dec. 1988 388,827 408,268 428,682 450,116 178 Aug. 1989 491,912 541,084 568,139 596,545 185 Aug. 1989 373,038 391,690 411,274 431,838 274/276 Sept. 1989 324,737 340,975 358,023 375,924 280 Sept. 1989 587,324 616,690 647,525 679,901 Subtotal 2,504,457 2,654,257 2,786,969 2,926,318 187 - - - - - 480/481 - - - - - 482 - - - - - 94,500 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 488 - - - - - - 108,500 Subtotal 0.:. 0. 0 0 Subtotal '.,q Zone Express 727,446 - 763,818 802,009 842,110 Loral 1,777,011 1,890,439 1,984,960 2,084,208 BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 81,375 108,500 113,925 119,621 494 Oct. 1990 70,875 94,500 99,225 104,186 1921194 Jan. 1991 79,206 158,412 166,333 174,649 2911293 Jan. 1991 141,186 282,372 296,491 311,315 Subtotal 1 372,642 643,784 675,973 709,772 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 38,850 252,450 265,073 278,326 GRAND ;.:<TO'rAt: .:2,$15943 : !9;550;491:;>< ;3;728,015 ` : 3,,g14,416. TOTAL Express 918,546 1,219,268 1,280,232 1,344,244 Local 1,997,403 2,331,223 2,447,783 2,570,173 -7- ATTACHMENT 1 SRTP Alternative 1 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Revenues FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Revenue Per Boarding 191 Annual Revenue '92 Annual Revenue '93 Annual Revenue '94 Annual Revenue 495/498 $1.92 $1,396,696 $1,466,531 $1,539,857 $1,616,851 178/185 $1,467,333 $1,540,700 274/2761280 $0.59 $1,048,436 $1,115,359 $1,171,127 $1,229,683 Subtotal: 1 $2,445,133 $2,581,890 $2,710,984 $2,846,534 187 $0.64 480/481/482 $1.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $0 4861488 $0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ' ZONE ,'$2,445,133 $2,581,890 $2,710,984 $2,846,534 Zone Express $1,396,696 $1,466,531 $1,539,857 $1,616,851 Local $1,048,436 $1,115,359 $1,171,127 $1,229,683 BSCP 492/494 192/1941291/293 $1.18 $0.64 1 $179,655 $141,051 $239,540 $282,102 $251,517 $296,207 $264,093 $311,017 $1,642,396 Subtotal: 1 $320,706 $521,642 $547,724 $575,110 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. $1.70 $66,045 $429,165 $450,623 $473,154 GRAND'.'.'. I . TOTAL $2,831,884 $3.532,696...:$3.709,331..-.'$3,894.798 TOTAL Express $1,642,396 $2,135,236 $2,241,998 $2,354,098 Local $1,189,487 $1,397,460 $1,467,333 $1,540,700 -8- CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE: FY 1992 TABLE L-1 Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 (1) Same definitions as SCRTD Note: Lines which go through EI Monte Station: 480, 481, 482, 486, and 488 would have the same fare as SCRTD for trips originating at the El Monte Station and destined for Los Angeles ($2.30 cash fare and $68.00 monthly pass). -9- Local Fixed Express Fired Fare Categories Route Service Route Service (Applicable At All Times) Base Zone Base Zone Regular Adult $0.85 - $1.20 $0.35 Transfer (Within System) 0.10 - 0.10 - Transfer (To Other System) 0.10 - 0.10 - Persons With Disabilities(1) 0.40 - 0.40 - Elderly(1) 0.40 - 0.40 - Student 0.85 - 1.20 0.35 Discount - - - - Passes - Regular Adult $32.00 - $44.00 $12.00 - Student (K-12) 12.00 - 44.00 12.00 - Student (College) 15.00 - 44.00 12.00 - Elderly/Disabled(1) 7.00 - 7.00 - (1) Same definitions as SCRTD Note: Lines which go through EI Monte Station: 480, 481, 482, 486, and 488 would have the same fare as SCRTD for trips originating at the El Monte Station and destined for Los Angeles ($2.30 cash fare and $68.00 monthly pass). -9- T J 13 LL Cl) O F - Z LZ I— L11 J LL v J J m lmw 2 t N r LA O Ch to v n 00 n v N C � 3v r CD a) a 0 0 0 0) C) 0; a) N N N r t) W ^w Q to W cri O O O O O O O 0 3 m Rb V Qr 93 U-) � CO r n co n N co Ww w lz o o O 0 0 0 0 Ip LU LL V m N �A Cl N p o o a r ch v n m n N T., N m ZNLo h 1 Q% o an n co n o ai ai ai (n ai W m m (Dj ai 4 0 0 0 0 o ca o E w J V y N y y CA N 'n N y N = > c c c C c c C c �i m a ai m m ---- m ai to m r v IT IT I O'7 w N g Z m � N Ry v v v v v ani CY N 0 co C }� ~` E E E E E E 0 c 0 0 c 0 c 0 0co _ Y O c cc w co c co c L Q U) cC D a r L a L a t a L a. L a a. CD 0 N to CD o U' C7 U' C7 C7 C7 C7 in m v T CIS � � Cp '- in cC , �- n co co co C) co C) co n U co r rn r rn Cc m CO YCo rn rn r rn rn r cn rn m r rn r rn r Q -11- O 0 1 Y c� C) CL c ca E _O N C) CC Cl N 11 O co m cz CL N O r IT r O N t N N O m C3 O r CA E H X1.1 O n M M O co LO cli O Lr) r O I+ CA C) O h U(� C) m N M M O O N N O �-+ CO O •cO CTJN C 'aLO Lf) r O O :o (e) VJ C cn rc LU O'a N M M O f`C\j O QI m O V � �O � p 10 N M M O O N N O N CD c � O r Q. r- N LO 0) r O M r to I LO r O M cI O E m N w j tO N M O M O O O p 0 r r M M r D Q orn'a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J CO (D p O C: M r � Q N � � N f Y cts m m to U L O a. p C) C cC > U L 47 > O LL C_ =3.. r O C > O E O >- OC) N as C « a) y o (1) O t LL O -ca CC) O U C co (D co O mh O tC Q U u m Cl d '= tq co 1 m C) T> CD > W as a) a a a o a) �- d 0 a cn cn w f- z z -11- O 0 1 Y c� C) CL c ca E _O N C) CC Cl N 11 O co m cz CL -12- a) w O L I Y ttf O _Q c E _O y 47 (d CL II O cz aD co d CV) o v r O r IT •ct N O O O r G T cc a CO M 0 It r 0 st v N 0 0 (Dt` MC)CC C; r rW Co V @7 O 'gr O r V O O N N r T � C O T a. 0 c Co te) LO O I- O O v r N L C m a) o kv LO O O N � O LL o co 'p C T co 4-0 Cu a C.) *' k LO cn r 0 rn rn 0 0 W N O v r N N •� 0 � O � a. a Va0 to co O N LO O O y N r r C C O W= 4' r00 U) OD O N to O O a� O N r o r k C) CL ON N O T LO O O J C � O m C d N C O F- Y `U m t cts CL r C O Q O U_ L O U _ > O IL C O C) , C O C > C O O N CC tU L LL_ Y C m O N U h >p p L o cu j O T U :E C d cc Q I Q m O �_ X LLI N It ) c cts CLY —co ca m i co N cis co i m V co ft3 3 3 F� cL a°' cn cn w 1—O Z Z -12- a) w O L I Y ttf O _Q c E _O y 47 (d CL II O cz aD co d Table L-5 1992 Adopted Budget Alternative 1 Scenario Historical and Projected Financial Status Sources and Application of Funds for Capital and Operations by Year of Expenditure (Thousands of Dollars) Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 (1) The 5% Local Contribution Requirement is being met by the County of Los Angeles credits for the Bus Service Continuation Proiect. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Mode: Motor Bus Audited Audited Estimated Planned Planned Planned Sources of funds for capital (revenues), no capital funds $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 are being applied for at this time Total Capital Expenses $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Sources of funds for ODeratina Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements Passenger Fares $633.3 $2,009.6 $2,831.9 $3,532.7 $3,709.3 $3,894.8 Non -transportation revenues $14.4 $40.9 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Prop. A Discretionary $1,181.0 $1,823.1 $3,859.1 $3,859.1 $3,859.1 $3,859.1 Prop. A Local Return (1) $0.0 $0.0 $8.4 $54.7 $54.7 $54.7 Prop. A Incentive Fund $0.0 $0.0 $936.1 $2,325.2 $2,325.2 $2,325.2 Other Local (1) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Subtotal Operating Revenues $1,828.7 $3,873.6 $7,635.5 $9,771.7 $9,948.3 $10,133.8 Total Operating Expenses J-$1',500.0'1'$3.849.7 ( $8,221.7 $9.851.5 -$10,142.1 $10,,i 1.3" Purchased Service - Included in Plan $1,324.8 $3,443.1 $7,529.2 $8,982.1 $9,233.6 $9,491.9 Purchased Service - Not Included in Plan $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 (1) The 5% Local Contribution Requirement is being met by the County of Los Angeles credits for the Bus Service Continuation Proiect. Note: (1) Aux. Rev -/Local Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (2)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. TPMn DA REPORTING FORM Table L -a Racal Year 1999-a0 Audited Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 13, 1991 All service is 'demand based' J System Total Total Total J Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday J Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I 679.0 948.0 1627.0 I Vehicle Service Miles(000) J 613.3 471.2 1084.5 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) J 46.3 38.8 85.1 1 Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 45.6 24.5 70.1 I Peak Vehicles J 15 24 39 1 Unlinked Passengers(000) J 1169.2 841.3 1810.5 I Linked Passengers(000) 980.1 633.6 1813.7 1 Passenger Revenue($000) J $666.3 $1,299.4 $1,965.7 I Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I sea0.9 $1,099.3 $1,780.2 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) J $1,437.8 $2,321.4 $3,759.2 I Full-time Equiv. Employees J 46.8 31.0 77.8 I Base Fare J $0.85 $1.20 I Total System I System Annual Saturday, J Total Total Total Sunday & Holiday, J Local Express Fixed and Weekdays J Service Service Routes i Total Vehicle Miles(000) J 714.4 948.0 1662.4 I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I 648.3 471.2 1119.5 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I 48.9 38.8 87.6 I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 48.3 24.5 70.8 i Peak Vehicles I is 24 39 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 1245.5 641.3 1986.8 I Linked Passengers(000) I 1067.8 633.e 1701.4 I Passenger Revenue($000) I $710.2 $1,299.4 $2,009.6 I Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I $723.8 $1,099.3 $1,823.1 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $1,528.3 $2,321.4 $3,849.7 Note: (1) Aux. Rev -/Local Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (2)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. TPMI DA REPORTING FORM Table L-0 Fiscal Year 19"1 Estimated Alternative 1 Scenario (Existing t BSCP Lines) Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 All service is 'demand based' Total Vehicle Milee(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) Total Vehicle Hours(000) Vehicle Service Hours(000) Peak Vehicles Unlinked Passengers(000) Linked Passengere(000) Passenger Revenue($000) Aux. Rev -[Local Subs.($000) Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) Full—time Equiv. Employees Base Fare Total System Annual Saturday, Sunday & Holiday, and Weekdays Total Vehicle Miles(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) Total Vehicle Hours(000) Vehicle Service Hours(000) Peak Vehicles Unlinked Passengers(000) Linked Passengers(000) Passenger Revenue($000) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) Note: (t)Missing information will be c information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the revenues made available to the Zone (3)Oper. Coot less Deprec.($000) inch aAn/ina and nAVmanta on the inAftivP I I System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday ) Service Service Routes Total Vehicle Milee(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) Total Vehicle Hours(000) Vehicle Service Hours(000) Peak Vehicles Unlinked Passengers(000) Linked Passengere(000) Passenger Revenue($000) Aux. Rev -[Local Subs.($000) Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) Full—time Equiv. Employees Base Fare Total System Annual Saturday, Sunday & Holiday, and Weekdays Total Vehicle Miles(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) Total Vehicle Hours(000) Vehicle Service Hours(000) Peak Vehicles Unlinked Passengers(000) Linked Passengers(000) Passenger Revenue($000) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) Note: (t)Missing information will be c information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the revenues made available to the Zone (3)Oper. Coot less Deprec.($000) inch aAn/ina and nAVmanta on the inAftivP I I 953.7 2001.8 I 1048.1 I I I 135.4 29.9 95.3 I 27 45 72 1895.5 918.5 2814.0 I I $1,138.7 $1,842.3 52,779.0 I I I I I I I I $0.85 $1.20 I System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Service Service Routes I I 953.7 I 1405.5 2359.2 I I I 88.3 29.9 98.2 I I 27 45 72 ( 1997.4 918.5 2915.9 ) I $1,842.4 I I $1,189.5 $2,831.9 I I $2,525.7 $1,341.8 $3,887.5 I 1 $4,375.4 $3,848.3 $8,221.7 xnpleted when contract total non—passenger ides leasing of vehicles for fleet TPM/TDA REPORTING FORM Table L --G Fiscal Year 1991-92 1992 Adopted Budget Aftemative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is 'demand based' System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I 1382.6 1142.7 2525.3 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 80.2 38.2 118.4 I Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 1 Unlinked Passengers(000) I 2224.2 1219.2 3443.4 I Linked Passengere(000) I I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1,341.9 $2,1352 $3,477.1 I Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I Full-time Equiv. Employees I I Base Fare I $0.85 $1.20 I Total System I System Annual Saturday, I Total Total Total Sunday d Holiday, I Local Express Fixed and Weekdays I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) l 1423.7 1142.7 2568.4 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 83.1 38.2 121.3 I Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 2331.2 1219.2 3550.4 I Linked Passengers(000) I I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1.397.4 $2,135.2 $3,532.6 I Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I $2,525.7 $1,388.1 $3,913.8 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $4,987.9 $4,863.6 $9,851.5 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) Is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone- (3)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for annnro —A i—fi— amt _� �- TPM17DA REPORTING FORM Table L-6 Fiscal Year 19923 Planned Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothifl Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is 'demand based' I System Total Total Total I Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I I Vehicle Service Miles(000) ( 1382.8 1142.7 2525.3 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) ( 801 38.2 118.4 I Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 I Unlinked Pasaengere(000) I 2335.4 1280.2 3815.6 I Linked Paseengers(000) I I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1,409.1 $2,241.9 $3,851.0 I Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) I I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I Full-time Equiv. Employees i Base Fare I $0.85 $1.20 I Total System I System Annual Saturday, I Total Total Total Sunday & Holiday, I Local Express Fixed and Weekdays I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I I Vehicle Service Miles(000) l .I 1423.7 1142.7 2568.4 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I I Vehicle Service Hours(000) ( 83.1 38.2 121.3 f Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 2447.7 1280.2 3727.9 I Linked Passengere(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1,467.3 $2,241.9 $3,709.2 Aux_ RevAocal Subs.($000) I $2,525.7 $1,388.1 $3,913.8 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $5,148.8 $4,993.3 $10,142.1 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for connru nn.l nawnnn/a m rha in wrlivo flnnl , _ TPM/TDA REPORTING FORM Table L-8 Fiscal Year 1993-a4 Planned Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is 'demand based' System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Milee(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I 1382.6 1142.7 2525.3 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Houre(000) I 80.2 38.2 118.4 I Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 I Unlinked Passengers(000) ) 24522 1344.2 3796.4 I Linked Passengers(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1,479.6 $2,354.1 $3,833.7 I Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I Full-time Equiv. Employees I Base Fare I $0.85 $1.20 I Total System I System Annual Saturday, I Total Total Total Sunday & Holiday, I Local Express Fixed and Weekdays I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I II 1423.7 1142.7 2566.4 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 83.1 38.2 121.3 I Peak Vehicles I 28 45 73 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 2570.1 1344.2 3914.3 I Linked Passengers(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I $1,540.7 $2,354.1 $3,894.8 I Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I $2,525.7 51,388.1 $3,913.8 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $5,311.5 $5,129.8 210,441.3 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost lase Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. -18- 2 0 LL0 Z O z a 0 J w J Q H - 0 N m cz NC/) r � c U) cts C CL O co a) co I— a o m cr C c c a) C � U 0 _ v, 0 O m a� O O 0 U OL U cn ca U U C O a;0CLaa` Z II II ll 11 a U . O U U U C d E E 0 U cc c C U rn O V CO wL c O o C�s E XD o Q �w0w w O` ca O �Q� o° a) CO D � O � O •+ _ w J m ao0 00 z-1 CLIL d L C 47 T CD O Z m cr C c c a) C � U 0 _ v, 0 O m a� O O 0 U OL U cn ca U U C O a;0CLaa` Z II II ll 11 a U . O U U U PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS FOR FY 1990 Table L-8 Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 Performance Audit Recommended Actions Operator Actions To Date NOT APPLICABLE -20- IMPACT OF FEDERAL FUND LOSS FY 1991 Table L-9 .'.'ternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 Item FY 1990 Current Proposed FY 1991 With Fed. $ W/Out Fed. $ Base Fare SEE Vehicle Service Hours TEXT Ridership Local Subsidies (Prop. A Local Return and other Local Revenues) LACTC Subsidies (Prop. A Discretionary and TDA) Farebox Revenues -21- CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION Table L-10 Alternative 1 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone For LACTC Use Only Prepared By: Young Park Operator Code: Date: March 12, 1991 A-95 Num: Project Group: Project Code: Strip Page #: Carryover Yr.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Grant Number Phase Program Year Expend Year Federal ($000) State ($000) Local ($000) Total ($000) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE -22- ATTACHMENT 2 SRTP Alternative 2 Scenario Service Plan Characteristics Buses FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line" start. Date of , Operation '91 Peak Buses '92 Peak Buses ISt. - 2nd 6 mts 6 mts '93 Peak Buses -:8us6s.. '94.. Peak, 495 Dec. 1988 15 15 16 19 21 498 Dec. 1988 15 15 16 19 21 178 Aug. 1989 3 4 6 6 6 185 Aug.1989 4 4 5 5 5 274/276 Sept. 1989 5 5 5 5 5 280 Sept. 1989 3 3 5 5 5 22 Subtotal 45 46 53 59 63 486 488 July 1991 9 9 9 9 [187 480/4811 July 1991 25 30 30 30 482 Jan. 1992 - - 12 12 12 16 Subtotal 0 34 51 51 51 486 488 July 1992 July 1992 - 13 13 - - - 10 10 17 Subtotal 0 0 0 23 23 VI '92 Total Buses Total - I-st :2nd 6 mts 6 mts '93 Total.. Buses '94 Total Buses 17 17 18 21 23 16 16 17 21 24 4 5 7 7 7 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 6 6 6 r 50 51 59 66 71 Subtotal 10 10 10 10 433 28 33 33 33 .0 - 14 14 14 0. 38 57 57 -57 Subtotal ':;:ZONE 45, 15 15 433 137:� x 11 11 .0 0 0 26 26 Subtotal ':;:ZONE 45, a 704: 433 137:� x 6 49f, WI 54 Zone Express 30 55 74 103 107 33 61 82 115 120 6 Local 15 25 30 30 30 17 28 34 34 34 BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 494 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 192/194 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 291/293 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 Subtotal 18 18 18 18 is 22 22 22 22 22 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 9 9 9 9 19 10 10 10 10 10 GRAND 'TOTAL 72. 107 131 .160 4. : .,.-.:'°T81'><° 121 -148':.� rv;�,: 186 TOTAL Express 45 70 89 118 122 .50 78 99 132 137 . Local 27 37 42 42 42' —32 43 49 49 49 ATTACHMENT 2 SRTP Alternative 2 Scenario Vehicle Service Hours FY 1991-1994 ZONE :. Llne .: ;" ..Start Date of:.': Operation .191 Annual: VSH ' '92 Annual VSH ., =.1st : 2nd 6 mts:: ; ::: '-6.&t :'92 Tot - Annual ".::' ': °::.::-.'93 . :::;Annual. '94 Annual VSH . 495 Dec. 1988 11,892 5,946 8,137 14,083 20,098 26,128 498 Dec. 1988 13,124 6,562 8,919 15,481 22,181 28,837 178 Aug. 1989 10,404 5,722 10,878 16,600 21,756 21,756 185 Aug. 1989 11,756 5,878 10,463 16,341 20,926 20,926 274/276 Sept. 1989 17,696 8,848 8,848 17,696 25,306 25,306 280 Sept. 1989 14,689 7,345 10,880 18,225 21,759 21,759 Subtotal1 79,561 40,301 . 58,125 . 98,426: '132,026 144,712 187 July 1991 - 16,631 16,658 33,289 33,315 33,315 480/481 July 1991 - 34,327 34,326 68,653 68,653 68,653 482 Jan. 1992 - - 16,908 16,908 33,816 33,816 6,846 .'Subtotal 0 50,958-- -:67,892 : 118,850 ".::135,784 13,692 -135,784 486 488 July 1992 July 1992 - - - - 23,340 23,340 - - - - 22,696 22,696 1,248 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 46,036 46,036 Subtotal Zone BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 1,872 1,248 1,248 326,532-: Express 25,016 46,835 68,290 115,125. 190,784 203,470 Local 54,545 44,424 57,727 102,151 123,062 123,062 492 Oct. 1990 1,872 1,248 1,248 2,496 2,496 2,496 494 Oct. 1990 1,682 1,122 1,122 2,244 2,243 2,243 192/194 Jan. 1991 6,846 6,846 6,846 13,692 13,692 13,692 291/293 Jan. 1991 6,924 6,924 6,924 13,848 13,848 13,848 Subtotal 17,324 16,140 16,140 32,280 32,279 '32,2791 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 1,295 4,208 4,207 8,415 8,415 8,415 GRAND TOTAL -..::TOTAL: 98,180 ` '<;1.11;507 ;:: 146,364':' :<`�257;971" k `35415911:, 357;226 Express 29,865 53,413 74,867 128,280 203,938 216,624 Local 68,315 58,194 71,497 129,691 150,602 150,602 ATTACHMENT 2 SRTP Alternative 2 Scenario Vehicle Service Miles FY 1991-1994 r7�T� Lne Start Date of Operation 191. Annual VSM '92 Annual VSM -Ist 2nd.. S mts 6 mts: '92 Tot :.. Annual. ' VSM - '93 ... :- ' Annual.- -VSM - '94 ''.Annual VSM 495 Dec. 1988 411,463 205,732 281,540 487,272 695,391 904,029 498 Dec. 1988 374,953 187,476 254,816 442,292 633,711 823,873 178 Aug. 1989 182,486 100,364 190,800 291,164 381,600 381,600 185 Aug. 1989 201,733 100,866 179,545 280,412 359,090 359,090 274/276 Sept. 1989 183,872 91,936 91,936 183,872 262,929 262,929 280 Sept. 1989 204,471 102,242 151,450 253,692 302,885 302,885 Subtotal 1,558,978 788,617 1,150,087 1,938,704 2,635,607 3,034,407 187 July 1991 - 241,913 241,913 483,826 483,826 483,826 480/481 July 1991 - 875,302 875,302 1,750,604 1,750,604 1,750,604 482 Jan. 1992 - - 358,945 358,945 717,890 717,890 130,688 Subtotal 0 1,117,215 1,476,160 2,593,375 2,952,320- :. 2,952,320 486 488 July 1992 July 1992 - - - - 459,764 459,764 - - - - 396,730 396,730 48,705 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 .856,494 856,494 Subtotal Zone BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 73,058 48,705 632,078 n6,444,421: ':> ' 6,843,221 Express 786;416 1;268,510 1,770,603 3,039,113 4,654,090 5,052,890 Local 772,562 637,322 855,644 1,492,966 1,790,331 1,790,331 492 Oct. 1990 73,058 48,705 48,705 97,410 97,410 97,410 494 Oct. 1990 68,467 45,645 45,645 91,290 91,290 91,290 1921194 Jan. 1991 130,688 130,688 130,688 261,375 261,375 261,375 291/293 Jan. 1991 185,768 185,768 185,768 371,535 371,535 371,535 Subtotal 457,981 410,805 410,806 821,610 821,610 821.610 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 25,791 83,820 83,820 167,640 167,640 167,640 GRAND TOTAL ATTACHMENT 2 SRTP Alternative 2 Scenario Boardings FY 1991-1994 W-601:1 .`iine.`. Start Date -of Operation 191 Annual Boardings '92 Annual Boardings - 6mts 6mts . '92 Tot .. Annual: Boardrngs '93. -Annual Boardln '94 Annual ngs 495 Dec. 1988 338,619 177,775 243,282 421,057 600,895 781,182 498 Dec. 1988 388,827 204,134 277,457 481,591 690,018 897,076 178 Aug. 1989 491,912 270,542 514,323 784,865 1,028,646 1,080,078 185 Aug. 1989 373,038 195,845 348,609 544,454 697,219 732,080 2741276 Sept. 1989 324,737 170,481 170,481 340,962 487,590 511,969 280 Sept. 1989 587,324 308,345 456,745 765,090 913,448 959,121 Subtotal 1 2,504,457 1,327,122 2,010,897 3,338,019 -4,417;815::.:•.4,961,505 87 July 1991 - 581,297 628,650 1,256,281 1,322,264 1,388,377 113,925 July 1991 - 975,866 1,000,263 2,000,554 2,100,582 2,205,611 !48!1(W)/481 482 Jan. 1992 - - 548,666 576,099 1,152,199 1,209,809 79,206 . Subtotal 0 1,557,163 2,177,579 3,832,1935:..:--:4,575.045- 166,333 ••' 4,803,797 486 488 July 1992 July 1992 - - - - 1,121,223 1,177,284 - - - - 711,424 746,995 54,250 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 1,832,647 1,924,279 Subtotal Zone SSCP "X.. 20NE 2,504;457.. ,'2;884;285``x::4=188,476`' 7;1�0,954r`i0825607.,<:3t;689;582 Express 727,446 1,357,775 2,069,667 3,479,302 6,376,341 7,017,957 Local 1,777,011 1,526,510 2,118,809 3,691,653 4,449,167 ' 4,671,625 492 Oct. 1990 81,375 54,250 54,250 108,500 113,925 119,621 494 Oct. 1990 70,875 47,250 47,250 94,500 99,225 104,186 1921194 Jan. 1991 79,206 79,206 79,206 158,412 166,333 174,649 2911293 Jan. 1991 141,186 141,186 141,186 282,372 296,491 311,315 Subtotal t 372,642 321,892 321,892. 643,784 675,973 709,772 910 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 38,850 126,225 126,225 252,450 265,073 278,326 GRAND TOTAL :TOTAL:' 2,915,949 ;3,332,402 ::4;636;593 N-.8;067;188:, 11;766,553-x;::12,677;680 Express 918,546 1,585,500 2,297,392 3,934,752 6,854,563 7,520,090 Local 1,997,403 1,746,902 2,339,201 4,132,437 4,911,990 5,157,589 ATTACHMENT 2 SRTP Alternative 2 Scenario Revenues FY 1991-1994 ZONE Line Revenue Per Boarding 191 Annual Revenue '92 Annual Revenue 1st 2nd 6 mts 6 mts '92 Tot Annual Revenue '93 Annual Revenue '94 Annual Revenue 495/498 $1.92 $1,396,696 $733,265 $999,819 $1,733,084 $2,478,553 $3,222,254 178/185 $1,070,761 $1,422,582 $2,493,343 $2,987,328 $3,136,695 2741276/280 $0.59 $1,048,436 $557,680 $879,194 $1,436,874 $1,844,873 $1,937,116 = ------ - Subtotalf $2,445,133 $1,290,945 $1,879,013 $3,169,958 $4,323;425: ':-$5,159,370-1 187 480/4811482 $0.64 $1.15 $0 $0 $372,030 $1,122,246 $402,336 $1,781,268 $774,366 $2,903,514 $846,249 $3,740,698 $888,561 $3,927,733 $1,642,396 Subtotal: $0 $1,494,276 $2,183,604 $3,677,880 $4,586,947 $4,816,294 $0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,429,465 $1,500,938 4861488 Subtotal: $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,429,465 $1,500,938 Subtotal _ ZONE $2,445,133 $2,785,221 $4,062,617 - $6,847,838 $10,339,837 $11,476.603 Zone Express $1,396,696 $1,855,511 $2,781,086 $4,636,598 $7,648,715 $8,650,925 Local $1,048,436 $929,710 $1,281,530 $2,211,241 $2,691,122 $2,825,678 BSCP 492/494 1921194/2911293 $1.18 $0.64 $179,655 $141,051 $119,770 $141,051 $119,770 $141,051 $239,540 $282,102 $251,517 $296,207 $264,093 $311,017 $1,642,396 Subtotal: 1 $320,706 $260,821 $260,821 $521,642 $547,724 $575,110 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. $1.70$66,045 $214,583 $2'4,582 $429,165 $450,623 $473,154 GRAND TOTAL $2,831,884 $3,260,625 $4,538,020 $7,798,645 $11,338,184 $12,524,867 i TOTAL Express $1,642,396 $2,189,864 $3,115,438 $5,305,302 $8,350,855 $9,388,172 Local $1,189,487 $1,070,761 $1,422,582 $2,493,343 $2,987,328 $3,136,695 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE: FY 1992 TABLE L-1 Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 (1) Same definitions as SCRTD Note: Lines which go through EI Monte Station: 480, 481, 482, 486, and 488 would have the same fare as SCRTD for trips originating at the EI Monte Station and destined for Los Angeles ($2.30 cash fare and $68.00 monthly pass). Local Fared Express Fixed Fare Categories Route Service Route Service (Applicable At All Trmes) Base Zone Base I Zone Regular Adult $0.85 - $1.20 $0.35 Transfer (Within System) 0.10 - 0.10 - Transfer (To Other System) 0.10 - 0.10 - Persons With Disabilities(1) 0.40 - 0.40 - Elderly(1) 0.40 - 0.40 - Student 0.85 - 1.20 0.35 Discount - - - - Passes - Regular Adult $32.00 - $44.00 $12.00 i - Student (K-12) 12.00 - 44.00 12.00 - Student (College) 15.00 - 44.00 12.00 - Elderly/Disabled(1) 7.00 - 7.00 - (1) Same definitions as SCRTD Note: Lines which go through EI Monte Station: 480, 481, 482, 486, and 488 would have the same fare as SCRTD for trips originating at the EI Monte Station and destined for Los Angeles ($2.30 cash fare and $68.00 monthly pass). T T J co LL 0 N v Cl)-j(D Q J CDcc coN p a > C Z L W � Q Z f" W J LL H m 'ca a3 -rz N o N co r` N v c c c c 0 cL 0 a L L L a a a a T y C (� Q) O O C) O O T O O T O O C) m (D m O O co O O I r , L N N N r N r ca a) � 111 C6 '-r- C C- mf m j m co 0 m w w C5 m 0) 0) rn T T T t d N LYi '04- I I I I t I I I Q. m !� a { : O O O O O O O O +r rr mlb t) X-1eQ3 N - - — r` co r`cv as p, 14 o a o Co 0 0 0 0 S LU > C7 '0 m i7 0 =L N to cO � ^ co r .'cc ui m ,yam 1 = V wW. U q) N u) O Ch u) tt n co n IT T o� a) a) a) (1) CD (1) $� �LZ a) o 0 a) 0 a) 0 a 0 a 0 a o w J W a) m (1) (D a) (1) _ > C C C C C C C Li - rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 0 m a) a) a) a) a) a) a) M m +UJ v cr) N Z O J N cc q) d7 V M rt to It to It M It r\ M N N O u) � F- C E E Cd cts a L L CL a 2m P 9) (D 0 a U) rn 00) OOi m T T Q E E E E r c c c c 0 cL 0 a L L L a a a a T �C) T 0 N (S "V CY) O) r , L co m ca a) � C6 '-r- C C- mf m j m co 0 m w w C5 m 0) 0) rn T T T E E Cd cts a L L CL a 2m P 9) (D 0 a U) rn 00) OOi m T T Q on 7 O L I Y cO (1) C1 c E O cn a) ca C1 N u 0 CO a> ca C1 � O N r ON IV, st N N O � CD O T w E r .y w w O m O i7 LO M O co N O LA h O ++ C5 (y> Q) Q N Ch r O O N N O +r C O CV) `� O N O n ti crj U m E o U � N cc w QD RJ> Cry M O to N LO O co CY) ' CA O C . � � Q 0 O Q W N M Cl) O O ^ N N O Cl)•' C O O a N LO O O C+) r to LO O r CD O a °7 E O w J tr N O M O O O O O 4) O .M— O ' m C9 O a Oj m O O O O O O O O CD co O = O C O N � Q y c c� m H �e ani h ai •C co a O U c [[ O _U L 0 O 0� C O C U L a� LL O O N O OC C O O C O a� "Q i cz _ Q' _ C a� O co CD o in E 0 ?. U co 0 = �. 0 ca Q U U � O C cz co c a a� ,� N m �. m a) x w 47 Q FO a cis CL L ca C13 CL a`) c v W0 cu 3 Z 3 Z cna)ca cn w on 7 O L I Y cO (1) C1 c E O cn a) ca C1 N u 0 CO a> ca C1 v N M O O (D U) O y (D N r ao M C C O r � a cc CV) O r M O O r M O p M C S M C (D T N r O Co T M r R! `a (n mM t. M O O co N O C FL N Vh v M O M v O O N _ rE .Q) O U c C V NLO N r O O M (A O M c �r T U CD -ow J N a ca j M M - N O O (CV � O LL C) r O T cts T M a r O o M O O CD H m E co r r M N •O Q O C tD O L a a CV N. O co T O T M O O r O r U N r� ti O O M O O tf r Nf M C C O r � CL O O b M N I,, N T O O M l* O O O M C p kii T CO a � .0 40 C\l N T O O a) ,t O O +� C (D p 0-0 4. C N N OM1 r,E rl- M w (D T O N (n O O C O O N N r .N c m a� m U N C O C M LL> C m C E} N (D as _ ` c' m o E m T a U LL �- _ O — C (D N U co L O o (tS U LL t d a cn R1 a) m cm — c a m m n cts (z CIS m v cts 3 3 n m m w c 1—O z z Table L-5 1992 Adopted Budget Alternative 2 Scenario Historical and Projected Financial Status Sources and Application of Funds for Capital and Operations by Year of Expenditure (Thousands of Dollars) Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 (1) The 5% Local Contribution Requirement is being met by the County of Los Angeles credits for the Bus Service Continuation Project. _q9_ 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Mode: Motor Bus Audited Audited Estimated Planned Planned Planned Sources of funds for capital (revenues), no capital funds $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 are being applied for at this time Total Capital Expenses $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Sources of funds for Operating Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements Passenger Fares $633.3 $2,009.6 $2,831.9 $7,798.6 $11,338.2 $12,524.9 Non -transportation revenues $14.4 $40.9 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Prop. A Discretionary $1,181.0 $1,823.1 $3,859.1 $12,399.2 $15,445.0 $15,445.0 Prop. A Local Return (1) $0.0 $0.0 $8.4 $54.7 $54.7 $54.7 Prop. A Incentive Fund $0.0 $0.0 $936.1 $610.1 $610.1 $610.1 Other Local (1) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Subtotal Operating Revenues $1,828.7 $3,873.6 $7,635.5 $20,862.6 $27,448.0 $28,634.7 :TotalA erating Expenses $1,500.0 , $3.849.71 .$6.221.7 $16,388.7 $22,560.7 $24,895.5 Purchased Service - Included in Plan $1,324.8 $3,443.1 $7,529.2 $15,335.7 $21,460.4 $23,745.7 Purchased Service - Not Included in Plan $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 (1) The 5% Local Contribution Requirement is being met by the County of Los Angeles credits for the Bus Service Continuation Project. _q9_ TPMlfDA REPORTING FORM Table L-6 Fiscal Yew 1969.400 Audited Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 13, 1991 All service is 'demand based' System I Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday I Service Service Routes I Total Vehicle Miles(000) ( 679.0 948.0 1627.0 I Vehicle Service Milee(000) ( 613.3 471.2 1084.5 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) ( 48.3 38.8 85.1 I Vehicle Service Hours(000) ( 45.6 24.5 70.1 I Peak Vehicles ( 15 24 39 I Unlinked Passengers(000) ( 1169.2 641.3 1810.5 I Linked Passengers(000) ( 980.1 633.6 1613.7 I Passenger Revenue($000) ( $666.3 $1,299.4 $1,965.7 I Aux. RevJLocai Subs.($000) ( $680.9 $1,099.3 $1,780.2 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) ( $1,437.8 $2,321.4 $3,759.2 I Full-time Equiv. Employees I 46.8 31.0 77.8 Base Fare I I $0.85 $1.20 Total System I I System Annual Saturday, ( Total Total Total Sunday b Holiday, ( Local Express Fixed and Weekdays ( Service Service Routes Total Vehicle Miles(000) I I 714.4 948.0 1662.4 Vehicle Service Miles(000) I I 648.3 471.2 1119.5 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I I 48.8 38.8 87.6 Vehicle Service Hours(000) I I 46.3 24.5 70.8 Peak Vehicles I ( 15 24 39 Unlinked Passengers(000) I ( 1245.5 641.3 1888.8 Linked Passengers(000) I I 1067.8 633.6 1701.4 Passenger Revenue($000) I ( $710.2 $1,299.4 $2,009.6 Aux_ RevJLocal Subs.($000) I ) $723.8 $1,099.3 $1,823.1 Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I ( $1,528.3 I $2,321.4 $3,849.7 Note: (1) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (2)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. TPMITDA REPORTING FORM Table L-6 Fiscal Year 1900-01 Estimated Alternative 2 Scenario (Existing + SSCP Lines) Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 12, 1991 All service is 'demand based" Annual Weekday I I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I Peak Vehicles ) I Unlinked Paesengers(000) I I Linked Passengers(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I Aux, RevAocal Subs.($000) I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I Full-time Equiv. Employees I Base Fare I Total System Annual Saturday, Sunday a Holiday, and Weekdays Total Vehicle Miles(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) Total Vehicle Hours(000) Vehicle Service Hours(000) Peak Vehicles Unlinked Passengers(000) Linked Passengers(000) Passenger Revenue($000) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) Note: (1)Missing information will be a information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost lose Deprec.($000) inch impleted when contract total non -passenger ides leasing of vehicles for N- - . System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Service Service Routes 2001.8 1048.1 953.7 135.4 95.3 29.9 27 45 72 1895.5 918.5 2814.0 $2,779.0 $1,136.7 $1,642.3 $0.85 $1.20 System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Service Service Routes 1405.5 953.7 2359.2 29.9 68.3 98.2 27 45 72 1997.4 918.5 2915.9 I I $2,831.9 I 51,189.5 $1,642.4 I $2,525.7 $1,341.8 $3,867.5 I $4,375.4 $3,846.3 $8,221.7 impleted when contract total non -passenger ides leasing of vehicles for N- - . TPM/TDA REPORTING FORM Table L --G Fecal Year 1961-W Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is "demand based' Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. Rev./Local Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)0per. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. System Total Total Local Service Total Express Service Fixed Annual Weekday 1 lot 6 mts 2nd 6 mts 1 st 6 mts 2nd 6 mts Routes Total Vehicle Miles(000) I ) Vehicle Service Miles(000) I 1 882.5 1016.7 1337.3 1762.1 4998.8 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I 1 Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 1 53.5 61.3 49.1 67.1 231.0 Peak Vehicles I 1 37 42 70 89 107/131 Unlinked Passengers(000) I ) 15882 1934.1 1445.9 2071.5 7037.7 Linked Passengers(000) I 1 Passenger Revenue($000) 1 1 $979.0 $1,177.2 $2.027.2 $2,853.7 $7,037.1 Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I 1 Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I 1 Full-time Equiv. Employees I 1 Base Fare I ) $0.85 $0.85 $1.20 $1.20 Total System I ) System Annual Saturday, I Total Sunday S Holiday, ( Total Local Service Total Express Service Fixed and Weekdays 11st 6 mts 2nd 6 mts 1st 6 mts 2nd 6 mts Routes Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I I 953.7 1172.1 1446.7 1948.8 5!M.3 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I I 58.21 71.5 53.4 74.9 258.0 Peak Vehicles I I 37 42 70 89 107/131 Unlinked Passengers(000) I 1 1748.9 2339.2 1585.5 2297.8 79692 Linked Passengers(000) I 1 Passenger Revenue($000) I 1$1.070-8 $1,422.8 $2,189.9 $3,115.4 $7.798.7 Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I 1 $2,053.6 $4,173.4 $2,053.5 $4,173.4 $12,453.9 Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $3,583.1 I $3,227.8 $4,000. $5,577.7 $16,388.7 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. Rev./Local Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)0per. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. TPM1TDA REPORTING FORM Table L--0 Fiscal Year 1992-03 Plarwred Alternative 2 Seerwio Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is 'demand based, System Total Fixed Routes 8623.7 303.8 160 10103.1 $10,034.6 System Total Fixed Routes 7433.6 354.5 160 11766.6 $11,338.2 $15,499.7 $22,560.7 Total Total Local Express Annual Weekday I Service Service I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) ( 2078.7 4545.0 I Total Vehicle Houre(000) I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 122.6 1812 i Peak Vehicles I 42 118 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 39422 6160.9 I Linked Passengers(000) I I Passenger Revenue($000) I 52,401.7 $7,632.9 I Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) I I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I Full --time Equiv. Employees I Base Fare I $0.85 $1.20 I Total System Annual Saturday, I Total Total Sunday & Holiday, I Local Express and Weekdays I Service Service I Total Vehicle Miles(000) I Vehicle Service Miles(000) I I 2423.2 5010.4 I Total Vehicle Hours(000) I I Vehicle Service Hours(000) I 150.6 203.9 I Peak Vehicles I 42 118 I Unlinked Passengers(000) I 4912.0 6854.6 I Linked Passengers(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I $2,987.3 $8,350.9 I Aux. RevJLocal Sube.($000) I $7,149.9 $8,349.8 I Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I I $7,598.4 $14,962.3 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevJLocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and Davments on the inactive fleet. System Total Fixed Routes 8623.7 303.8 160 10103.1 $10,034.6 System Total Fixed Routes 7433.6 354.5 160 11766.6 $11,338.2 $15,499.7 $22,560.7 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. TPM/TDA REPORTING FORM Table L-4 Fiscal Year 1903-04 Planned Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared by: Young Park Date: March 29, 1991 All service is 'demand based` System Total Total Total Local Express Fixed Annual Weekday J Service I Service Routes Total Vehicle Miles(000) J Vehicle Service Miles(000) l J 2078.7 4943.8 7022.5 Total Vehicle Hours(000) I J Vehicle Service Hours(000) I J 122.E 193.9 316.5 Peak Vehicles I J 42 122 184 Unlinked Passengers(000) I i 4139.4 1 6791.7 10931.1 Linked Passengers(000) I Passenger Revenue($000) I i $2.521.8 I $8,634.3 $11,156.1 Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) J Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I J i Full-time Equiv. Employees J Base Fare I J $0.85 $1.20 Total System I J System Annual Saturday, J Total Total Total Sunday h Holiday, i Local Express Fixed and Weekdays I Service I Service Routes Total Vehicle Miles(000) Vehicle Service Miles(000) I I 2423.2 I 5409.2 7832.4 Total Vehicle Hours(000) II Vehicle Service Hours(000) J 150.6 216.6 387.2 Peak Vehicles I J 42 122 164 Unlinked Passengers(000) I J 5157.6 7520.1 12677.7 Linked Passengers(000) I J Passenger Revenue($000) I I $3,136.7 $9,388.2 $12,524.9 Aux. RevJLocal Sube.($000) I I $7,149.9 $8,349.8 $15,499.7 Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) I J $7,882.3 i $17,013.2 $24,895.5 Note: (1)Missing information will be completed when contract information available. (2) Aux. RevAocal Subs.($000) is the total non -passenger revenues made available to the Zone. (3)Oper. Cost less Deprec.($000) includes leasing of vehicles for service and payments on the inactive fleet. 2 ccO C'3 z cc O H z 2 F -- z cc 0 w _I m ti ,o cTJ c a� v CO CM C L O ao O C O N C a1 = cc L a cp M li = r O CV) E >-_ Cfl � � Cb ami � c a hi co o _�o m Cr C C y 0 O cz c U O Cl) y C U O Co dO C) O a� a� m a a O` O 0 0 CL U 0 en 0 r 0 0 ° a` a- a. u u Z II II U 0 0 0 0 U U3 w C d E E 0 U . � c „ cc «. C7 U O m m co 0 O O E E CD �`9 LUo— 'o." 0E =�s Q W 0 44 � O ~ a 0 0 t7Q44 _ C O� m CC m Q � 0 i C O _ I11 'j m m a 0 O U a`0) Z zi a Q c 0 E C7 � Z _�o m Cr C C y 0 O cz c U O Cl) y C U O Co dO C) O a� a� m a a O` O 0 0 CL U 0 en 0 r 0 0 ° a` a- a. u u Z II II U 0 0 0 0 U PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS FOR FY 1990 Table L-8 Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By: Young Park Date: March 13, 1991 Performance Audit Recommended Actions Operator Actions To Date NOT i APPLICABLE I i i -39- IMPACT OF FEDERAL FUND LOSS FY 1991 Table L-9 Alternative 2- Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone Prepared By. Young Park Date: March 13, 1991 Item FY 1990 Current Proposed FY 1991 With Fed. $ W/Out Fed. $ Base Fare SEE Vehicle Service Hours TEXT Ridership Local Subsidies (Prop. A Local Return and other Local Revenues) LACTC Subsidies (Prop. A Discretionary and TDA) Farebox Revenues I CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION Table L-10 Alternative 2 Scenario Transit System: Foothill Transit Zone For LACTC Use Only Prepared By: Young Park Operator Code: Date: March 13, 1991 A-95 Num: Project Group: Project Code: Strip Page i#: Carryover Yr.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FY 1992: Purchase 24 new standard coaches with lifts, fareboxes, radios, and air-conditioning. FY 1993: Purchase 33 new standard coaches with lifts, fareboxes, radios, and air-conditioning. FY 1994: Purchase 5 new standard coaches with lifts, fareboxes, radios, and air-conditioning. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Table L-4 projected fleet characteristics shows the planned increases in the peak fleet, which can only be met by expanding the existing fleet. These projected requirements match the planned service plan of Alternative 2 for the next 3 vears. Grant Number Phase Program Year Expend Year Federal ($000) State ($000) Local Total ($000) ($000) NOT APPLICABLE I � I i I I I f I NOT APPLICABLE � ATTACHMENT 3 FOOTHILL. TRANSIT ZONE PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION POLICY Private Enterprise Policy In accordance with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Short Range Transit Plan Fiscal Year 1992-94 Guidelines, transit operators are required to evaluate new and significantly restructured transit service to determine if it could be more effectively operated by a private enterprise. Significantly restructured service is defined as a change in mode of service or change of more than 250/0 of the directional route miles and additional equipment as required. The following information is presented in compliance with current Private Sector Guidelines. Prooram Overview The Foothill Transit Zone stresses the concept of allowing competitive procurement for all existing services. Services including bus operating and maintenance, management and administration, public relations, and support items such as telephone information, monitoring and forwarding complaints, and printing time tables are contracted for by the zone. This competitive procurement process produces significant cost savings with no degradation of service levels to the transit user. In FY '91, transportation contract services alone were budgeted at $8,202,204. This figure is expected to grow in FY '92 as Foothill Transit proposes expanded service. The Foothill Transit private sector policy is divided into seven primary components. The process includes: • Private Sector Notification Process • Contract Policy Guidelines • Cost Evaluation Criteria • Evaluation of Contracting Proposa s • Resolution of Procedures • Current Year Participation Update • Service Expansion Program 1. Private Sector Notification Process In order to fairly encourage private sector involvement, private operators will be notified of the opportunity to comment and participate in the Foothill Transit Zone's planning activities at the following stages in the planning process: • At the onset of development of the three year program of projects in the SRTP and the Capital and Operating Plan. • When new or significantly restructured services are proposed for implementation (refers to those fixed -routes with modification of route aiionment or increase in service hours and miles greater than 25%). V Notification will be through posting of direct notice requesting review and comment in a recognized professional journal, and/or through direct mail solicitation (using notification process mechanisms established by LACTC and SCAG). In addition, Foothill Transit will also discuss projected service needs in a committee setting with interested private transportation providers. Private sector comments concerning Foothill Transit Zone's policies, plans, or services will also be accepted at any time with or without formai notification. Furthermore, as allowed under Private Enterprise Policy Guidelines, Foothill Transit Zone reserves the right to accept or reject any or ail proposals or comments received. Thus, all major proposals chosen for implementation will be made subject to a competitive bid pursuant to the contracting policy, which will also be included in the notification sent to private providers. 11. Contract Policy Guidelines A cost per vehicle hour is utilized by Foothill Transit Zone for all private provider fixed -route service contracts. The cost element of the service contracts consists of annual contract budget costs as pre -determined by either contract bid prices or re -negotiation. New contract awards are made for multi-year terms with options for term extension in subsequent years. Contractual terms for all new service bids are outlined in Request for Proposal (RFP) documents which are circulated prior to all new service bids. Terms are further clarified during pre-bid conferences which shall be held prior to award of all service bids. The final determination of bid award is made by the Foothill Transit Zone's Board of Directors. M. Cost Evaluation Criteria Comparison of costs will be made based upon projected cost data provided by interested private sector operators. Award of contract is not based exclusively on a low bid. All applicable operating costs will be evaluated based on private operators bid packages (composed of one or more fixed routes) over a three year period or other periods as specified in the RFP. For evaluation purposes, costs are usually not separated on an individual line basis. IV. Evaluation of Contracting Proposals In keeping with the guidelines of this policy, ail additional private sector comments and proposals received shall be given full and fair consideration by the Foothill Transit Zone. Proposals shall be evaluated within the context of adopted policies set forth by the Foothill Transit Zone Board of Directors and service standards and policies as identified in the SRTP. All comments and proposals are subject to review within the context of all state and local ' -nding regulations under which the Foothill Transit Zone must operate. V. Dispute Resolution Procedures If a dispute arises concerning implementation of the procedures as identified in this policy, every effort shall be made to address the complaint through standard administrative procedures. Formal complaints are to be addressed in writing to the Foothill Transit Zone to allow for staff review. If the complaints cannot be resolved at staff level, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for review and final resolution. VI. Current Year Participation Update The goal of this adopted policy (.e., to utilize competitive procurement for all services) is being met through current operating policies. As the Foothill Transit Zone faces challenges in the years ahead and attempts to meet the transportation needs of its rapidly growing service area, increasing demand for local and express service has been growing steadily. In response to these demands, Foothill Transit Zone has evaluated Fiscal Year 1992 service improvements to identify increased private sector contracting opportunities. A line by line analysis of existing routes which includes initiatives for private sector contracting opportunities follows. Additional Line Description Buses Needed 178 Due to increased ridership, 1 propose doubling of weekday service. 185 Expanded weekday service. 1 280 Extension of route. Increased 4 - 5 service hours. 210 Route New Service along 1-210 Freeway 11 from Pasadena to Claremont. Corridor has no existing service. The above list is not intended to be exhaustive. Foothill Transit Zone actively encourages innovative proposals wherever a proposal can be developed to address unmet service needs. Vil. Service Expansion Program -- Express Service on the 1.210 Freeway Congested Corridor The Foothill Transit Zone is proposing to operate a new express service on the 1-210 (Foothill Freeway) congested corridor from Claremont (East San Gabriel Valley) to Pasadena. The new service will help to reduce both vehicle miles traveled and air pollution emissions as well as to relieve congestion along the 1-210 Freeway corridor. Providing 22 total daily bus trips for commuters each day, this new service will operate Monday to Friday, with headways of 15 minutes during rush hours cnly. Service will be provided westbound tc Pasadena in the mornings and eastbound from Pasadena in the afternoons. Service Description Connecting Park & Ride (P -A -R) lots and other gathering points along the 1-210 Freeway corridor, the eastern portion of the line would have limited stops while the portion of the line within Pasadena would offer local service. Proposed stops include: • Claremont, Rail Station • Claremont, Proposed P -A -R Lot at Foothill and Indian Hill • La Verne, Proposed P -A -R Lot at Foothill and Route 30 • Glendora, Lone Hill P -A -R Lot • Glendora, Grand P -A -R Lot • Azusa, 1-210 at Azusa • Monrovia, 1-210 at Myrtle (Will Serve Future Rail Station) • Pasadena, Local Stops • Pasadena, Transit Center As a demonstration of public-private cooperation to reduce congestion and enhance suburban mobility, the proposed service, as with all Foothill Transit Zone Services, will be contracted through competitive bidding. -45- Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Agenda Please note room change. 7:30 AM, Wednesday, April 10, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone - Executive Offices 100 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 480, West Covina 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS - BARTLETT, KUHN, LEWIS, MCMILLEN & WRIGHT 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 1990 & FEBRUARY 1991 4. REPORT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 5. INCLUSION OF DIAMOND BAR IN JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND REALIGNMENT OF CITY CLUSTERS 6. EXECUTIVE BOARD APPOINTMENTS AT MAY 8, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE ANNUAL MEETING 7. DESIGNATION OF 210 FREEWAY EXPRESS AS "LINE 690" 8. FREE FARE WEEK FOR THE FIRST WEEK OF OPERATION - LINE 690 9. AUTHORIZATION TO INSTRUCT CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED - LINES 187, 690, AND 480/481 10. PRESENTATION OF AUDIT OF FISCAL YEARS 1989 AND 1990 11. SELECTION OF MARKETING STUDY CONSULTANT 12. AUTHORIZATION TO EQUIP NEW ZONE OFFICES A. TELEPHONE SYSTEM B. FURNITURE - Continued - Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Agenda April 10, 1991 Page 2 13. APPROVE 1992-94 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 14. AUTHORIZATION TO ORDER MANUFACTURE OF REMAINING ZONE BUSES 15. FISCAL YEAR 1992 BUDGET 16. PUBLIC COMMENT 17. EXECUTIVE SESSION - LITIGATION 18. ADJOURNMENT Foothill Ti-ansit 100 North Barranca Avenue • Suite 980 ;50.000�� West Covina, California 91791-1600 818/967-3147 • FAX 818/915-1143 April 4, 1991 To: Executive Board Members Re: Background Information for April 10, 1990 Board Meeting Agenda Item 4. Report from Executive Director A. Ruling by the Court of Appeals - On April 3, 1991, the Second Appellate District, Division Two issued a ruling which upheld the Superior Court decision in favor of Foothill Transit, in the law suit filed by the RTD unions against Foothill Transit, the LACTC and the RTD. Copies of the decision are attached. The decision appears to clear the way for the implementation of the remaining seven Zone lines after the decision becomes final - 30 days after the decision was issued. B. Report on Expenditures - The expenditure reports for February and March 1991 are attached to this memorandum. C. Monthly Operating Report - The report on operations for the months of January and February 1991 will be presented at the Board meeting. D. Mid Cities Area Transportation Zone - The Steering Committee for the Mid Cities Area Transportation Zone did not meet in March, but will reconvene on April 18. The primary topic for this meeting will be the 5 % of net budget contribution requirement imposed by the LACTC for transit operators. The May meeting is scheduled to focus on the evaluation of Foothill Transit which Ernst & Young is performing for the LACTC. 5. Inclusion of Diamond Bar in Joint Powers Authority and Realignment of City Clusters - At the direction of the Executive Board, staff has distributed an amendment to the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Powers Agreement which will include the city of Diamond Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 2 Bar as a Zone member. The Zone member at each city has been asked to secure city council approval within the month of April 1991. After it joins the Joint Powers Authority, Diamond Bar must be placed in a city cluster for Executive Board representation. After discussions with Zone members who would be affected, staff is recommending a minor realignment of the cluster boundaries to accommodate the inclusion of Diamond Bar. It is recommended that the city of Baldwin Park be moved to cluster 3 (see attached map and city listing from the Zone rules) and that the city of Diamond Bar be included in cluster 4. This would balance the population of the clusters while maintaining the geographical adjacencies of cities within clusters. Staff recommends that the Executive Board forward this recommended placement of Diamond Bar in cluster 4, and the concurrent move of Baldwin Park to cluster 3, to the full Zone for action at the May 8, 1991 annual meeting. 6. Executive Board Appointments at May 8. 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Annual Meeting - As stated in the Zone Rules, adopted at the annual meeting in May 1988, all Executive Board members and alternates are appointed for a term of three years and stand for election at the same time. This was adopted to ensure the continuity of the Executive Board during the first three years of scheduled Zone service. It is important to note that both the members and alternates to the Executive Board must be selected from among the named members to the Zone. City council Zone alternates are not eligible to serve as Executive Board members or alternates. The three year terms expire at the May 8, 1991 annual Zone meeting. Staff recommends that the city selected Executive Board members notify the Zone members within their city clusters of the upcoming election at the May 8, 1991 meeting, and of the importance of this selection. 7. Designation of 210 Freeway Express as "Line 690" - Staff has worked with RTD to identify an appropriate line number for the new 210 freeway express service. RTD staff has concurred with the designation of this new service as Line 690. This line number is available on the lighted destination sign curtains on the front and side of Foothill Transit buses and does not conflict with the numbering system in place for RTD and Foothill Transit buses. It should be noted that the "400" series of lines which designates express service on RTD and Foothill buses is reserved for express bus service to the downtown Los Angeles area. Staff recommends that the designation of "Line 690"be adopted for the new 210 freeway service. Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 3 8. Free Fare Week for ` le First Week of QDeration - Line 690 - Staff recommends that the new service on Line 690 begin with no charge for the first week of service. This would facilitate promotion of the service, and is consistent with previous action of the Board to offer free fare on the first day of service of other lines. 9. Authorization to Instruct Contractor to Proceed - Lines 187. 690. and 480/481 - Staff requests authorization to instruct ATE Management and Service Company, Inc. to proceed with the implementation of lines 187, 690, 480/481. A. The Board has previously authorized negotiations with ATE to operate Line 690, the new service along the 210 Freeway. Negotiations will be concluded prior to the Board meeting, and a recommended price per hour will be presented. B. Line 187 is the final line in a contract consisting of six lines, previously contracted to ATE. The other five lines (178, 185, 274/276 and 280) have been in operation since September 1989. Line 187 was subject to the stay imposed in August 1989 by the California Supreme Court. Staff recommends that this line begin operation by ATE at the earliest date possible, under the existing contract. B. Lines 480/481 were approved by the Executive Board as the next lines to implement. A Request for Proposals was distributed in 1989 and ATE was selected as the contractor for this service. However, due to the Court stay, a contract was not executed. Staff recommends that this contract be executed, subject to negotiation of the rate per hour. 10. Presentation of Audit of Fiscal Years 1989 and 1990 - The audit of Foothill Transit for fiscal years 1989 and 19901 as been completed. Mr. Syd Porter, Project Manager for Miranda Strabala & Associates will attend the meeting and present the audit findings for information to the Executive Board. 11. Selection of Marketing Study Consultant - Thirty-two firms received the Request for Proposals for the marketing "Attitude and Awareness" study. The deadline for submission of proposals was March 29, 1991. Seven firms submitted proposals and four responded with a decline to propose. The proposed budget is $45,000 for both a passenger survey and a non -rider survey. Staff has evaluated the proposals and narrowed the selection to three firms. Interviews of these firms are scheduled for Thursday, April 4, 1991. Staff will make a presentation and a recommendation to award a contract at the Board meeting. Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 4 12. Authorization to Eauip New Zone Offices - At the February Executive Board Meeting, the Board authorized staff to enter into a new lease for an expanded office space and requested staff to evaluate the purchase of furnishings for the new space. The telephone system and office furniture are proposed to be funded from the Foothill Transit carryover account which the LACTC maintains in Foothill Transit's name, and not from the regular budget. Based on substantive research and evaluation staff proposes the following: A. Telephone System - Staff has met with representatives from both AT&T and PacTel Business Systems to discuss Foothill Transit's current telecommunication current and future needs. An important factor is the identification of a system that is easily expandable, as our needs require additional lines or stations. The system should also be easily upgraded as enhancements are developed. The system must be cost effective now and when expansion is required or enhancements added. Staff also evaluated the addition of voice mail as a means to increase productivity in the office and enhance the utilization of the phone system. The systems demonstrated were the Merlin System from AT&T and the Meridian/Norstar System from PacTel. Both systems appeared to meet the evaluation criteria. Price proposals were received from both firms with PacTel being the lowest, most responsive proposer. The negotiated price with PacTel is $24,131.38, including taxes and installation. PacTel will attend the Board Meeting to demonstrate the proposed system. Staff requests approval to execute a contract with PacTel in the amount of $24,131.38 for the recommended system B. Office Furniture - In conjunction with the expansion of office space, staff recommends the purchase of a new Board conference table and office furniture. After extensive research and negotiations, staff is recommending the purchase of a custom conference table/Board table, with matching office furniture at an amount not to exceed $45,400. Samples of the style, color and fabric will be presented at the Board Meeting. 13. Approve 1992-94 Short Range Transit Plan - Each year the Zone is required by the LACTC to submit a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The SRTP contains a description of anticipated service, the Zone's adopted budget and the subsidies required of the LACTC. Staff will present highlights of the Zone's Short Range Executive Board April 4, 1991 Page 5 Transit Plan (which is attached to this report) at the Board meeting for discussion and adoption. 14. Authorization to Order Manufacture of Remaining Zone Buses - Staff requests authority to complete the manufacture of 45 Gillig buses which were previously bid to implement approved Foothill Transit service. This authority is requested due to the recent Court of Appeals decision. Staff further requests authority to negotiate the procurement of 12 additional buses to implement the service expansion program contained in the Short Range Transit Plan. 15. Fiscal Year 1992 Budggt - The draft FY 1992 Budget is attached to this report. Staff recommends approval of the budget in concept, referral of the budget to the Administrative Advisory Committee for detailed review, and convening a special Board meeting for recommendation of a final budget prior to the May 8, 1991 Zone annual meeting. The draft budget is structured to continue existing operations, and then add additional components as the Zone is able to take over additional service. With the court decision issued on April 3, 1991, staff recommends adoption of the full budget. Very truly yours, William P. Forsythe Executive Director WPF/ais Attachments: Decision from Court of Appeals Expenditure Report Zone Rules (Including City Cluster Map and Listing) Short Range Transit Plan Foothill Transit FY 1992 Draft Budget Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Foothill Transit Zone's Executive Board was held on December 12, 1990 at the Foothill Transit Zone's Executive Offices, 100 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 980, West Covina, California. In the absence of President Wright, Member Kuhn assumed the chair and called the meeting to order at 7:32 a.m. The following members were present constituting a quorum of the Executive Board: Michael Lewis, Member Don McMillen, Member Bob Kuhn, Member Staff members present: William Forsythe, Executive Director Roger Chapin, Deputy Executive Director Violet Varona, Deputy Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES By unanimous consent, Member Kuhn declared that the minutes of November 14, 1990 were approved. REPORT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Forsythe reviewed the expenditure report and Mr. Chapin reviewed the Operations report for November 1990. Board members requested that staff develop a chart reflecting farebox and ridership trends on Zone buses over the past year. Mr. Forsythe reported that the Steering Committee of the Mid -Cities Transportation zone met on November 15th. The Committee discussed the eligibility of bus lines that travel into Orange County and Mr. Forsythe commented that the process for submitting an application for this one will probably take seven to eight months. The Foothill Transit Zone has accepted A county assignment for management of the Express Lines under the Bus Service Continuation Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Minutes of December 12, 1990 Page 3 Executive Director can talk with the City of Los Angeles about leasing them up to 10 buses. AUDIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989 The Executive Director has contracted with the accounting firm of Miranda, Strabala & Associates for $33,355 to conduct a new, thorough audit of Fiscal Year 1989. Mr. Forsythe requested that the Executive Board approve this contract. On motion of Member Lewis, seconded by Member McMillen and unanimously carried, the Executive Board ratified the contract with Miranda, Strabala & Associates to conduct a new, thorough audit of Fiscal Year 1989 for $33,355. SERVICE EXPANSION PROGRAM - 210 FREEWAY EXPRESS Mr. Forsythe, having already reviewed the the prior agenda item, commented that the service was approved earlier by the LACTC approval of the Foothill Transit Zone. He letter from the California Bus Association expansion. PUBLIC COMMENT Service Expansion under 210 Freeway Express and the RTD in their also commented on a related to this service Rita Vega, LACTC, said the the LACTC is applying for a State grant to plant trees along commuter rail routes. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 a.m. Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Foothill Transit Zone's Executive Board was held on February 13, 1991 at the Foothill Transit Zone's Executive Offices, 100 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 980, West Covina, California. President Wright called the meeting to order at 7:35 a.m. The following members were present constituting a quorum of the Executive Board: Don McMillen, Member Henry Morgan, Alternate Member Judy Wright, President Staff members present: William Forsythe, Executive Director Roger Chapin, Deputy Executive Director Khanh Nguyen, Deputy Secretary Joyce Baner, Public Information Officer APPROVAL OF MINUTES on motion of Member Morgan, seconded by Member McMillen and unanimously carried, the minutes of January 9, 1991 were approved. REPORT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Forsythe gave the following report: °The Zone evaluation is proceeding well. It will be used by the LACTC to determine the future of the Foothill Transit Zone. It is the first year of a two year evaluation. °The Executive Board had previously authorized a corrected version of the FY 1989 Audit Report; Miranda, Strabala & Associates will combine this report with the FY 1990 Audit Report. There will be no disclaimers in this combined report. °Zone staff and consultants are working on the annual update to the Short Range Transit Plan and it will be presented to the Executive Board for approval. °Zone staff, working with the Los Angeles County Treasurer's Office, has been able to secure a favorable equipment lease Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Minutes of February 13, 1991 Page 2 rate for buses for Lines 192/194 and 291/293. °The Mid Cities Transportation Zone will be reviewing, among other issues, the characteristics of the lines that will be included in that Zone. °Two new staff members have been added to Forsythe & Associates: Ms. Joyce Baner will be the new Zone Public Information Officer and Ms. Lonnie Mattie will be a Finance Assistant for the Zone. °The LACTC is working on restructuring the formula for distributing funds to Transit operators. Meetings to discuss these changes will be held between the LACTC, RTD, and other transit operators. On the recommendation of President Wright, Zone staff will arrange meetings between the Executive Board members and the 3 Los Angeles County Supervisors whose Districts are now in the Foothill Transit Zone. ROUTE ALIGNMENT CHANGE AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FARES ON THE 210 EXPRESS Mr. Forsythe reported that Zone staff met with employers who requested that the 210 Express exit at Rosemead Avenue and stop along Foothill Boulevard in East Pasadena. Zone staff informed them that this change would delay the line's travel into Downtown Pasadena and result in a loss of ridership and revenue on the line; however, if the employers would make a 2 year commitment to purchase 100 passes a month, the Zone would institute the route change. Mr. Forsythe said that the revenue generated by this commitment will meet the LACTC's 5% local funding requirement for the Line thereby avoiding having to ask Pasadena City for the funds. The employers were given until Friday to contact the Zone with their decision. Mr. Forsythe recommended that the current route schedule be approved without a stop in East Pasadena and that the Board conditionally approve a proposed rerouting with a stop in East Pasadena if the Zone receives a written commitment from employers to purchase 100 bus passes a month. Mr. Forsythe also discussed the financial benefits of Zone bus service for the East Pasadena employers and various aspects of the anticipated start of the service. Following discussion, on motion of M -tuber McMillen, seconded by Member Morgan and unanimously carried, the Executive Board approved the current route schedule for Line 210 and conditionally approved a route change into East Pasadena if the Zone receives a Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Minutes of February 13, 1991 Page 3 commitment from employers to purchase 100 passes a month for 2 years. Mr. Forsythe reviewed the fare structure for Line 210 with Zone members. On motion of Member Morgan, seconded by Member McMillen and unanimously carried, the Executive Board adopted a $2.25 cash fare and a $80.00 monthly pass rate for the Line 210 express service. UPDATE ON AMERICAN DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) AND STATUS OF MOBILITY DEVICES Roger Chapin reported that he met with the citizen who spoke at the last board meeting about boarding Zone buses with a 3 -wheel wheelchair. In that meeting they discussed how to safely strap the wheelchair on the bus. Mr. Chapin then introduced Mr. Martin Gombert from ATE Management who gave an update on the ADA and its affect on the transportation of 3 -wheel wheelchairs. Mr. Gombert reviewed the safety and civil rights issues connected with transporting that type of wheelchair. He also offered various alternatives to addressing the issue. President Wright requested that this item be on the next agenda for further discussion and that it be regularly reviewed at future Board meetings. AMENDMENT TO BUILDING LEASE To accommodate the Zone Office's increased need for office space, staff is proposing that the Office move into a larger location in the same building and extend the term of the lease, which expires on May 1, 1992, for an additional three years. Mr. Forsythe spoke about the cost and configuration of new office space. The total square footage to be leased is 2,866, of which 455 square feet is proposed to be subleased to Forsythe & Associates. The cost of the office space will be $1.75 per square foot until the existing lease expires May 1, 1992. On motion of Member McMillen, seconded by Member Morgan and unanimously carried by the following roll call vote, the Executive Board agreed to (1) amend the building lease to lease new office space totaling 2,866 square feet, (2) sublease 455 square feet of office space to Forsythe & Associates and (3) extend by 3 years the term of the building lease: AYES NOES Members McMillen, Morgan and None President Wright CONTRACT PRICE INCREASE POLICY Mr. Forsythe discussed with the Executive Board the relationship between fluctuating fuel prices and the Zone's method of Foothill Transit Zone Executive Board Minutes of February 13, 1991 Page 4 contracting for bus service. Currently the Zone requires contractors to submit a fixed price per hour for their service with no adjustments other than what is provided for in the contract. Zone staff recommended changes that would enable service bidders to submit proposals with two different pricing options: (1) a price per hour for all expenses and (2) a price per hour for everything except fuel --the fuel costs would be in a second price per hour and would be linked to a standard pricing index. In the second option, changes in the contract payment should only occur if the fuel prices exceed or fall below certain percentages, to be determined, of the total contract price. President Wright requested that these two pricing options be included in future contract proposals and not in the Zone's current contracts. By unanimous agreement of the Executive Board, Zone staff will include the two different pricing options mentioned above in their solicitation of service proposals. PUBLIC COMMENT A member of the audience commented on the special attention that Zone bus drivers on Line 498 give to their riders. The Board recessed at 8:41 a.m. to hold a Commuter Rail Coordinating meeting. The Board reconvened at 9:23 a.m. and then recessed into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation against the Zone. The Board reconvened at 9:35 a.m. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:37 a.m. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 1277, AFL-CIO, UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, and NEIL SILVER, Plaintiffs and Appellants, vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, and FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE, Defendants and Respondents. 0 B 043891 (Super. Ct. No. C 687231) f CF OPM•t= =I L E D APR 3 X11 jtOM'C N. WILSON Ckrft De;uty Clark Appeal from a judgment -of the superior Court of Los Angeles county. Eli Chernow, Judge. Affirmed. Joseph Freitas, Jr., William J. Flynn, and Neyhart, Anderson, Reilly 6 Freitas for Plaintiffs and Appellants 11 Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277, AFL-CIO, and Nail Silver. Lawrence Drasin for Plaintiff and Appellant United Transportation Union. Suzanne B. Gifford, Jeffrey J. Lyon, and Richard A. Katzman for Defendant and Respondent Southern California Rapid Transit District. Dewitt Clinton, County Counsel, and Riordan S McKinzie, Kenneth Klein, and Thomas K. Bourke for Defendants and Respondents Los Angeles County Transportation Commission and Foothill Transit Zone. This action challenges the creation, by the Los Angeles county Transportation Commission (the "Commission"), of a new local transportation zone, the Foothill Transit Zone VrTZ"), within the service area of the Southern California Rapid Transit District ("RTD"), and to the order of the Commission directing transfer of fourteen bus routes from the RTD to the FTZ. The challenge was brought against the Commission, RTD, and FTZ by appellants Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277, AFL -CID, and United Transportation Union (collectively, "the Unions"), the collective bargaining representatives of RTD employees, and by Neil Silver, a resident and taxpayer of Los Angeles County and President of Local 1277. They appeal from a final judgment in defendants' favor, denying injunctive relief. Appellants contends "A. Because RTD did not freely consent to the transfer of its lines to the Zone, the consent requirement of PUC 1 99286 was not properly met. "B. The trial court erred when it interpreted the Public Utilities Code as empowering the IACTC to dismember the RTD. , *C. The Zone approval violated PUC S 99221 as the proposed Zone service is to be 'provided =d controlled' by the RTD. f 30637. "D. The actions taken by Defendants are barred by, PUC 2. "E. The actions of RTA and LACTC violated the § 13(c) agreement between LACTC, RTD and UTU. "F. The trial court erred in not finding the action of LACTC as improper inducing of breach of contract. "G. The trial court erred in denying injunctive relief based on the UTU agreement." II. Following public hearings, committee meetings, and consultations with interested parties, including RTD, the Commission established guidelines for applications for a local transportation zone, indicating the nature of the RTA lines that could be Included within the zone. In 1486, twenty cities in the San Gabriel Valley, joined by the County of Los Angeles, filed a pre -application which contemplated a zone geographically encompassing virtually the entire San Gabriel Valley, and thirty- five bus lines.v The application process proceeded through numerous public hearings before committees of the Commission and before the Commission itself. Comments were received from the general public, RTD, the Unions, and other interested parties. 1. The twenty cities are Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina, Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Habra Heights, La Verne, Monrovia, Pomona, San Dimas, South E1 Monte, Temple City, Walnut, and West Covina. The proposed local transportation zone was originally called the San Gabriel Valley Transit Zone. 3. 4 In due course the proposed zone was scaled down to include only fourteen bus lines. RTD opposed the application, stating it supported the concept of local transportation zonts but not the proposed FTZ. On December 7, 1987, however, the Commission approved the FTZ application, thus establishing the first local transportation sone in Los Angeles County. In connection with the creation of the zone, RTD was required to transfer to FTZ fourteen bus lines, each serving a portion of the zone. Same of these routes are over forty miles long, and some serve areas of the County outside the twenty cities, including Pasadena, La Puente, and downtown Los Angeles. FTZ was to operate these fourteen lines as its only service during a three-year demonstration phase. FTZ operations were to begin with two major express lines on July 1, 1988. The Unions and Silver commenced this action on May 25, 1988, and applied for a preliminary injunction forbidding RTD to transfer the lines until it had met its statutory and contractual obligations to its affected employees, and restraining the Commission from implementing or funding FTZ until RTD had I consented to it. On June 22, 1988, the superior court issued a preliminary injunction restraining the Commission from implementing or funding FTZ without consent from RTD. on June 30, 2988, RTD filed a cross-complaint against the Commission and FTZ, seeking declaratory relief, an a. n injunction, and a peremptory writ of mandate establishing that creation of FTZ was unlawful because, Jhter Al", it had not given its consent and could not lawfully do so. The next day the Commission began withholding Proposition A discretionary funds from RTD in the amount of $9 million per month. (Proposition A instituted a one-half percent sales tax, some proceeds to be distributed by the Commission for transportation purposes.) RTD, in response, sued the Commission and made plans for a fifty percent reduction in bus service to take effect December 4, 1988. Within a few days thereafter, the Commission and RTD reached a compromise drafted by Mayor Tom Bradley, County Supervisor Dean Dana, and Jan Hall, an RTD Director. In this agreement RTD consented to creation of FTZ, the Commission released the withheld funds to RTD, and RTD withdrew its litigation against the Commission. operation of the first two FTZ lines commenced immediately. The Commission represented to the court, however, that no other routes would be transferred to FTZ pending trial. The action was tried, without a jury, from May 16 to June 21, 1989. Thereafter the trial court issued its 33 -page statement of decision, followed by entry of judgment for defendants on August 4, 1989. This appeal followed. our Supreme Court restored the preliminary injunction with respect to all but four of the lines, pending final determination of the appeal. 5. III. The parties have exhaustively presented their respective theories of the proper construction and application of numerous provisions of the Public Utilities Code, particularly sections 30637, 30754, 99209, 99209.1, 992100 99221, 99286, 130003, 130261, and 130372. We have determined, however, that the appeal can be decided without resolving these statutory questions. Our usual judicial reticence to make unnecessary rulings is reinforced by a circumstance made clear by all parties: this litigation is but askirmish in a much larger conflict now being waged in the legislative and executive branches of state and local government over control of public mass transit systems in Southern California. In such a situation we doubt the usefulness of a pleonastic judicial opinion. The judgment appealed from is the denial of a permanent injunction sought by appellants to restrain formation and operation of FTZ. The decision whether to grant or deny an injunction is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Galton Bay Jgrina, Inc v. Imperial irrigates Dist. (1983) 172 Cal.App.3d 914, 964-965.) The potential availability of a damages remedy is, of course, a strong factor justifying denial of injunctive relief. Even when a plaintiff may be at risk of suffering damages not monetarily compensable, the trial court retains authority to deny an injunction that appears inequitable because it would cause hardship or harm to the Public. (Cots v. J,.• Angeles County (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 282, 6. 292; Palo Alto -Menlo Park Yellow Cab Co. v. Aanta Clara_ County Transit Dist. (1976) 65 Ca1.App.3d 121, 132; see Civ. Code, 1 34231 Code Civ. ?roc., 5 526.) In determining whether to issue an injunction, the court must consider the interests of third persons and of the general public. (jjZd v. KAv-Dix Ranch (1970) 9 Ca1.App.3d 588, 592.) With these considerations in mind, we detect no abuse of discretion. substantial factors support the trial court's decision to deny a permanent injunction. These include the political nature of the controversy; the apparent availability of other remedies for redress of any breach of appellants' contractual and statutory rights; the public interest in receiving the benefits of what the Commission has determined will be better transit service; the broad public interest in completion of a project intended partly as a temporary and novel experiment in transportation planning; the existence of ongoing legislative efforts to regulate and modify the relationship of RTD to the Commission (see Pub. Util. Code, 5 130051.8, which requires the two agencies to prepare a joint plan for their reorganization into a "unified comprehensive institutional structure") ; and the tact the commission, FTZ, and RTD --the three entities directly participating in the new local transportation zone—have all agreed to its formation and operation. In the presence of these factors, even were we to uphold every contention of appellants in respect to construction and application of the Public Utilities Code, we would still be 7. unable to conclude that denial of a permanent injunction was, under all the circumstances of this case, an abuse of discretion. The judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondents. we concur: , )` -� J. KLEIN (Brett) � Acting P.J. GATES ��t , J. NOTT 0 * Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. Foothill Transit Transaction Report 2,11/91 Through 3/31/91 FOOTHILL—All Accounts 4/4/91 Date # Payee Memo Category Amount EXPENSES 91212 Forsythe & Associates Capital Costs 91216 Forsythe & Associates ------------- 2/22 91180 ATE/Ryder January Storage 2/22 91182 ATE/Ryder December Storage 2/22 91184 Chicorp March Lease Payment 2/26 91207 Gillig balance of retention due 2/22 91183 Chicorp Financial Service March Lease Payment Total Capital Costs County Services --------------- 2/22 91198 L.A. County/Commission S1st/2nd Quarter FY/1990-91 2/28 91209 L.A. County/Comm. Service Total County Services Executive Board --------------- 2/22 91203 Henry Morgan 2/28 91179 Bob Bartlett Total Executive Board Insurance 3/28 91229 AOV Insurance Total Insurance Management Services 3/5 91212 Forsythe & Associates 3/27 91216 Forsythe & Associates 2/28 91210 Forsythe & Associates 3/27 91223 Forsythe & Associates Total Management Services January Board Meeting January Meeting , Umbrella Coverage Renewal 4871 3,345 4871 3,345 4871 118,610 4871 10,022 4871 61,836 197,158 4694 2,734 4694 1,594 4,328 4688 100 4688 100 200 4427 1,548 1,548 January 1991 4701 Reimbursement for Insurance 4701 UCLA/Rose Bowl Supervision 4701 Reimbursement—signs for fai 4701 52,422 1,234 0 1,374 55,030 Marketing 2/22 91185 Haskell Printing Company March Bus Passes 4524 815 2/22 91186 Haskell Printing Company April Bus Passes 4524 815 2/22 91187 Signs, Banners N' Balloon Balloons 4524 31 2/22 91188 GTE Directories January/February Advertisin 4524 84 2/22 91192 The Copy Center December Copies 4524 276 2/22 91194 Simpkin Design Revisions on Brochure 4524 193 2/22 91205 Signs, Banners n' Baiioon Helium Refill 4524 13 2/22 91206 Los Angeles Times SG Valley Edition & Mailed 4524 42 2/27 91207 Inland Valley Bulletin Local Newspaper Subscriptio 4524 10 3/27 91220 American Public Transit A Classified Ad—RFP 4524 30 3/27 91221 American Public Transit A Subscription to Psgr.Transp 4524 65 3/27 91222 Business Yellow Pages listing for one year 4524 294 Total Marketing 2,667 Office Expenses 2/22 91190 GTE California January Telephone 3236 611 2/22 91191 Siesta Manufacturing Co., Office Furniture 3236 189 2/22 91193 Eastland Tower Partnershi AC January 3236 120 2/22 91195 GTE Directories Pomona/Rsmd. Advertising 3236 74 2/22 91196 MCI Telecommunications Long Distance 3236 342 3/4 91211 GTE California February Invoice 3236 732 3/27 91217 Pitney Bowes Postage Meter Rental 3236 107 3/28 91224 GTE California February/March Invoice 3236 1,409 Total Office Expenses 3,584 Operating Expense ----------------- 3/7 91213 Embree Buses, Inc. January Invoice 4859 62,014 3/27 91218 ATE/Ryder Maintenance on LAVTA buses 4859 1,533 2/19 91177 ATE/Ryder December Contract Service 4859 122,386 2/22 91181 ATE/Ryder January Contract 4859 129,202 2/22 91197 ATE/RYDER Grand People — January 4859 413 3/7 91214 Embree Buses, Inc. L.A. County Faire Service 4859 40,887 3/7 91215 Embree Buses, Inc. United Way Shuttle 4859 1,081 3/28 91225 Embree Buses 492/494 November 4859 16,670 3/28 91226 Embree Buses 492/494 December 4859 18,016 3/28 91227 Embree Buses 492/494 January 4859 18,227 3/28 91228 Embree Buses 492/494 February 4859 16,354 3/27 91219 Laidlaw Transit January Service 4859 65,801 Total Operating Expense 492,584 TOTAL EXPENSES $757,099.31 Foothill Transit Zone Proposed Rules (Revised) As authorized by Section 4.A.(2) of the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, the Zone hereby enacts the following rules. 1. QUORUM A. Zone The quorum for meetings of the Zone shall be twelve (12) Zone members, or Zone alternates acting on the behalf of members. B. Board The quorum for meetings of the Executive Board shall be three (3) Board members, or Board alternates acting on the behalf of Board members. 2. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ZONE MEMBERS All financial contributions to the Zone made pursuant to Section 8 of the Foothill Transit Zone Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement shall be voluntary on the part of the contributing City or County, and shall only be made after approval by the governing body of such contributing agency. 3. INSURANCE I Zone shall require an adequate level of insurance, as determined by Board, from each contract provider of service. Zone shall also procure and maintain liability insurance for the Zone. 4. CLAIMS Zone adopts as a regulation pursuant to Government Code 935, relating to claim procedures, Los Angeles County Code Chapter 4.04. 5. BOARD MEMBERS A. Membership All members of the Executive Board shall be members of the Zone, not Zone alternates, and shall be ^sidents of the service area of the Zone. Board members may receive compensation for serving as members if the Zone so determines. Terms shall be three years and all Board members shall stand for appointment at the same time. Members shall hold membership on the Board during the term for which they are appointed and until their successors have been appointed, except that members may be removed from membership on the Board at any time for any reason by the appointing authority. One named alternate Board member shall be allowed per appointing authority. In the case of a vacancy in membership on the Board, the same shall be promptly filled by the appointing power. An appointment to fill a vacancy occurring during an unexpired term shall be for the period of the unexpired term. The appoint- ing powers shall forthwith notify the Secretary of the Board of all appointments. B. City Selection Board members from Cities shall be Zone members, chosen from within a cluster of Cities (as established in Exhibit A) by those Cities. Each City shall cast one vote for the Board seat within its cluster. One Zone member shall be selected as an alternate Board member from each cluster of Cities by those Cities. 6. OFFICERS Officers of the Zone shall be members of the Board. A. Transition Year For organizational purposes, the Board at its first meeting shall select officers of the Zone and Board. At the next Zone meeting, and at the first Zone -2- meeting in each succeeding calendar year, the Board shall nominate officers for ratification by the Zone as officers of the Zone and Board. B. Selection The Board shall select from its members a president and vice president at its first meeting and thereafter in each succeeding calendar year the Board shall nominate or re -nominate its president and vice president. In the event that the president or vice president ceases to be a member. of the Board, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next meeting of the Board held after each vacancy occurs. In the absence or inability of the president to act, the vice president shall act as president. The president, or in his absence the vice president, shall preside at and conduct all meetings of the Board and Zone. 7. ADMINISTRATIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE An Administrative Advisory Committee shall be comprised of the City Managers from the Cities represented on the Executive Board, along with the Chief Administrative Officer or Director of Public Works of the County. The purpose of the Administrative Advisory Committee is to advise the Executive Board on business matters related to the operation of the Zone and its impact on the political entities which comprise the Zone. ROUTES, FARES AND SERVICE MODIFICATIONS Service modifications which affect less than 25% of the miles in a route, and less than 25% of the riders on a route may be determined by Board without approval by Zone. The Board shall notify all Cities and County of such modifications within thirty (30) days of Board approval. County and each City shall be notified in writing of any proposed service modification which affects 25% or more of the miles and riders in a route no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such change, unless such modification is adopted -3- as an emergency modification by Board, in which instance notice shall be given as soon as practicable. County and Cities shall notify Board in writing, with copy attached of the council action or board resolution, as to the objection to such modification. Failure to so notify Board will constitute affirmance of the proposed modification. If at least 33% plus one of the members of Zone object (in the form of a council action or board resolution) to any service modification which has been recommended by Board, that item shall be submitted to a vote of Zone. Approval of fares may be accomplished through approval of the annual budget by Zone, or by notification to Cities and County under the provisions above which apply to approval of service modifications. 9. CONTRACTING Zone shall contract for services to the greatest extent possible. THIS IS TO CERTIFY: That I am the duly -appointed, qualified and acting Secretary of the above- named Foothill Transit Zone and that the above and foregoing Proposed Rules was submitted to the membership at their first meeting held on May 4, 1988, was ratified by the vote of members entitled to exercise the majority of the voting power of said Zone. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this aMh day of � , 1991 (Name) Oe -POX Secretary -4- Exhibit A CITY CLUSTERS CLUSTER CITY POPULATION* 1 Pomona 117,827 Claremont 35,996 San Dimas 29,594 La Verne 29,172 Total 212,589 2 West Covina 93,397 Glendora 43,177 Covina 42,473 Azusa 36,815 Total 215,862 3 Arcadia 49,254 Monrovia 33,552 Temple City 32,039 Duarte 21,104 Irwindale 1,060 Bradbury 914 Total 137,923 4 E1 Monte 93,852 Baldwin Park 62,188 Walnut 23,750 South E1 Monte 18,977 La Habra Heights 5,358 Industry 390 Total 204,515 * Source: State of California Department of Finance, May 1, 1987 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative C Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 (6 Months) [ (6 Months) 1 (12 Months) (12 Months) NEN ZONE SERVICE . (6 Months) 1. (6 Months)'. Maintain 1 Expand ; Operate Operate Operate Routes; Operate Routes. f Exisiing 1 Existing ! BSCP (1, Foothill ' 167.4W1 187, 480/1 .. Full Service Service ! Routes { 210 and 482 f and 482 . Operation j Revenues Fare Box and Pass Revenue $1,290,945 $1,879,013 $521,642 $429,165 $1,494,276 $2.183.604 $7,798,645 Proposition A Discretionary Funds 1,929,527 1,929.527 0 54,698 4,270,066 4,270,067 12,453,885 Proposition A Incentive Funds 0 0 0 610.088 0 I 0 610,088 Total Revenue 1 $3,220,472 1 53,808,540 1 $521,642 1 $1,093,951 $5,764,342 @ $6,453,671 1. $20,862,6.18 ! Ooeratina Expenses Express Lines 495 and 498 $787,187 $1,116,261 - - - - $1,903,448 Local Lines 178,185, 274/6.280 1,008,297 1,507,663 - - - - 2,515,960 BSCP Lines 192/94, 291!93, 492,494 - 1,321,424 - - - 1,321,424 Express Lfne 210 Express - - - 579,373 - - 579,373 Local line 187 - - - - 605,229 610,524 1,215,753 Express Lines 480/81, 482 - - - - 1,386,124 2.127,767 3.513.891 Total Operating Contracts $1,795,484:.1.52,623,924 1. ST.321.424. $579.373 I ST.M',253 52,738.291 .: 514,049:849 Support 141,052 a 1 203,439 I1 112,9T7 29,453 I 2 237,574 902,897 Zone Adm nstrationc 152,844 220.452 122,423 I 106,450 193.309 257,438 1,052 926 Total operating Expenses 5Z089,380 'I 53.047,815.1 $1,556.824 i $715,2761 $2,363.074 1.: ; : 53.233,303-.: S73.005,672 1 Capital Expenses Buses Required for Operations $571,013 $660,585 S584,191 $378,675 $425,460 $729,479 $3,349,403 Buses Idled from Court Stay 3,589 0 0 0 j 0. 0 33,589 j Bus Lease Expenses i 5604,602 , 56&0,585 i 5584.191 1 $378,675 1 $425,460 t $729 479 1' S3 382 992 Total Expenses $2.693,982 53.708.400 152.'.41,015 51,093.951 52,788,_?: $3,962.782 V, 6,288,664 Revenues -Expenses $526.490 $100.140 �($1,619.373) $0 52,975,808 $2,490,889 $4.473,954 LACTC Additional Subsidy $0 I 50 $0 $0 s0 I $0 $0 f Nei revenues i 5526.490 1 $100,140 i (51.619,373)1 50 1 $2,975.808 i $2,490,889 I $4,473.954 01-Aor-91 -1- April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Proposition A Revenue Estimates Alternative C Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain Existing Service I Service. Rev: Hrs: _ Rate/Hr : Annuaf Amount Express 19,635 $67.91 $1,333,413 Local 53,205 $47.47 $2,525,641 Total Prop. A VL=etionary ..$3,859,064 SSCP Lines" Service f Annual Amount Local I Exp Prop. A Funds $0 Total ' SO' Line 210 Express" k :.Service <::: -: ,6.Annual Amount Express Prop. A Incentive So10,088 5% Contrib Prop. A Local Return 554,6 98 , Total .. $664,786 Operate Lines 187, 480/81 &. 482 Service Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount 1 Express 102,469 $67.91 $6,958,670 j Local 33,315 $47.47 $1,581,463 -- Tara€ Prop. A Discretionary $8,540.1 S3 i ' No Prop A Discretionary or Incentive funds are identified for this service. " A joint 5% local contribution from corporate pass sales are identified for this service. Assumes LAC7C Proposition A Incentive Funding cf $610,088. -''- April 4, 1991 W O O W t:4 f� N = m r t N V) U N � C �Q O 0) r M W ( O to N [ ftn _ ¢ O RS cz C >` tri tp t17 LL LL T 't f f c eA6! co n:u7: C 47171: M to.Qi Cl) ME=1 6:T i9•ifl4{ ,i 10' i c7 : N n 1 n : O N: Ln Le I c co! i Ln Co.. c) r-:. U CES; c� C tC C Lel �I M to Z co wE 4] Ci 1: to n j. fi& KE_ to C1 N h C1 M O U c`nC •7 M.7 I o u7 cD O N m Lo co m M M cz <00 tns if} 4Ri N N 3 to co C) Cf J Q IT -3- ac:nnlc tD M t'7 N I [O r r 1n r i Q1 to T n to to to w w to O W t:4 f� c c O C: o. 69 �t 0) r O ( O to N [ ftn ! C-3 `I C Q�tn N co c M :, >` tri tp t17 I 49 49 49 T N f f ( I M ci i o n: 1 t r Q 041 iy O Of C M 00 i V to to ! { E 4% 49H { �I M to Z co wE 4] Ci 1: to n j. fi& KE_ to C1 N h C1 M O U c`nC •7 M.7 I o u7 cD O N m Lo co m M M cz <00 tns if} 4Ri N N 3 to co C) Cf J Q IT -3- ac:nnlc tD M t'7 N I [O r r 1n r i Q1 to T n to to to w w to LO N r EZ ,v Q V Q!fl N M t0 Co N to N tp Q T M k6 N O N to t0 N r �caT r �4rd. ralCl) rn O O O t1� CO C r r r M M M Q O to O U� M r co v tri cD M M M M 401 49 qi} fA n CO o r T to CO to N O r CO m r ^ N N M n 419, to N M O N O to Q F -- Q April 4, 1991 n n a) cc f� c c O C: Ln to to to ! 69 �t 1 { Lo M O ( O to N [ to Q Q to f T T r T i M M to to i. ... N co c M :, >` tri tp M M M M49 49 49 49 LO N r EZ ,v Q V Q!fl N M t0 Co N to N tp Q T M k6 N O N to t0 N r �caT r �4rd. ralCl) rn O O O t1� CO C r r r M M M Q O to O U� M r co v tri cD M M M M 401 49 qi} fA n CO o r T to CO to N O r CO m r ^ N N M n 419, to N M O N O to Q F -- Q April 4, 1991 LLI z .T CV) a) C\1 (2) C) a�. cm 44 HUmT U5 CL ZM Mw "WWI in NI cli >0 1= 14-6 C13 cc Cd (z L co Qi Cj ri IUI 60 Ga I TI 0. 1 5.1 ca m LL co .T CV) cn a�. 44 Pi Mw "WWI in NI cli 4. I I co 0,1 ce) Cj ri IUI 60 Ga I TI U, 1 5.1 ca m co r- cn 44 C4GO Mw "WWI in NI N C61 C4 Of Ln cm cli Z ?�- CO C, cO mI C%jQti CD a-, -4- April 4, 1991 W OvN LO €€ _ _c J N cm f 'n T C) Z m o. W > 'j Q 'o L O n to �cli N cz n. ° o C3 roLL om co Es -5- LO N 69. n 0 N Q' O co 4% F -- Q April 4, 1991 C15 N LO €€ o m cm f u? cc E �I ) N EO 'o Iz sa y' 31 n n n to N C3 om co Cl �,. Lo to to cH Co. K U} i c to CO i W c I[ LLJ 4 V N 1 69 69 i i I c9 co K 'I N -5- LO N 69. n 0 N Q' O co 4% F -- Q April 4, 1991 C15 N LO €€ o m cm f u? cc E �I ) N EO 'o Iz sa y' 31 CI E n I I� -5- LO N 69. n 0 N Q' O co 4% F -- Q April 4, 1991 C15 N FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. C Capital Budget Cnntinued Fiscal Year 1991-92 (12 MONTHS) BSCP LINES -8- April 4, 1991 of Monthly Annual. Lines Buses Months.: Amount Amount 492,494 7 12 614,000.00 $168,000.00 192194, 291193 15 12 $34,682.59 $416,191.08 Tota! (6 MONTHS) EXPANDED SERVICE of Monthly Annual Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount 5 24 6 $60,000.00 $360,000.00 I 5.6 -8- April 4, 1991 Alternative C FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics ZONE 187 Start '91 '92 Peak Buses 4801481 Date of Peak 1st 2nd Line Operation Buses 6 mts 6 mts- 495 Dec. 1988 I 15 ( 15 16 498 Dec. 1968 15 15 16 178 Aug. 1989 3 4 6 185 Aug. 1989 4 4 5 274/276 Sept. 1989 5 5 5 280 Sect. 1989 3 3 5 ..Subtotal 45' 46 S3' 187 July 1991 - 9 9 4801481 July 1991 - 25 30 482 Jan. 1992 - - 12 4 Subtotal " 0' 486 488 July 1992 July 1992 - - - - - - 1st 2nd Buses 6 mts 91 '92 Total Buses Total 1st 2nd Buses 6 mts 6 mts 17 16 17 16 18 17 4 5 7i 4 4 6 5 5 5 4 4 6 50 51 69 10 10 28 - 14 ' 0. :. 38 57 Subtotal i -ZONE ','45, 7,, �.80 , . 104 50. '89 116 Zone Express 30 55 74 33 61 82 Local 15 25 30 17 28 34 BSOP 72 107 131 1 4 4 -1 i 492 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 494 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 3 1921194 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 7 7 7 j 2911293 Jan. 1991 6 6± 6 8 8 8 I :Subtotal 18 18 18 1 22 22 22 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 9 9 9 10 10 10 GRAND !� TOTAL 72 107 131 1 82 121. 148 f TOTAL Express 45 70 89 50 78 99 Local 27 37 42 32 43 49 -9- April 4, i 99 1 Foothill Transit Administrative Budget Fiscal Year 1991-92 Alternative A FY91 FY9 +/- $ +/- % Staffing (With Annualized Finance Asst.) 413,836 476,480 24,000 62,644 15.1% Consultants 70,000 125,000 55,000 78.6% Subtotal $483,836 $601,480' 0 117,644 24.3% Public Information 96,000 120,000 24,000 25.0% Insurance 3,000 1,500 0 (1,500) -50.0% County Services 40,000 40,000 0 0.0% Fiscal Audits 3,000 0 183,51 (3,000) -100.0% Office Lease 31,000 58,4341 27,434 88.5% Office Expenses 12,000 18,000 6,000 50.0% Conferences & Memberships 0 14,000 14,000 N/A Mileage & Entertainment 0 10,000 10,000 N/A Executive Board 6,000 6,000 I 0 0.0% Total $674,836 1869,414 1 194,578 28.8% Alternative 8 Staffing Consultants Addition 127,512 15,000 ' Budge 603,992 140,000 Subtotal $142,512 $743,992 Public Information 24,000 144,000 Insurance 0 1,500 County Services 4,000 44,000 Fiscal Audits 0 0 Office Lease 01 58,434 Office Expenses 5,000. 23,000 Conferences & Memberships 0 ! 14,000 Mileage & Entertainment 2,000 12,000 Executive Board 6,000 12,000 Total 183,51 1 $1,052,926 , -10- April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative B Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 ' 5604,602 U7.1,014 5584,191 NEW ZONE SERVICE i (6 Months) (6 Months) (12 Months) (12 Months) (6 Months) j (6 Months) ' ! Maintain Maintain Operate Operate Operate Routes f Operate Routes Existing Existing i ESC j Faothill i 187, 4W! 187, 48011 Full Sarvica Service Routes 2117 and 462 ! and 482 ': Coeration Revenues 5604,602 U7.1,014 5584,191 5378,675. Express Lines 495 and 498 $787,187 5818,365 - - ,Fare Box and Pass Revenue $1,290,945 $1,290,945 5521,642 5429,165 51,494,276 $2,183,604 57,210,577 Proposition A Discretionary Funds 1,929,527 1,929,527 0 54,698 4,270,C66 x,270,067 12,453,885 Pr000sition A Incentive Funds 0 0 0 610,088 0 0 610,088 Total Revenue f 53.220,472 i 53,220.472 i 5521,642 , 51,093,95t 55,764342 [. 55,453,671.; $20,274,550 Operating Expenses j 5604,602 U7.1,014 5584,191 5378,675. Express Lines 495 and 498 $787,187 5818,365 - - - j - S1,605,552 ;Local Lines 178,185, 274/6, 280 1,008,297 1,019,961 - - - - 2,028,258 I BSCP Lines 192!94, 291193, 492, 494 - - 1,321,424 - - - 1,321,424 'Express Line 210 Express - - - 579,373 - - 579,373 ;Local Line 187 - - - - 605,229 610,524 1,215,753 Express Lines 480181, 482 - - I - - 1,3861124 ( 2,127,767 3,513,891 Total Operating Contracts i $1.,795,484' 51,838,326 t 51,321,424E $579,373 ' 51,991 353: :::::; .52;738;231$1%264 251 . ............ I RTD Support Contract 141,052 141,052 112,977 29,453 178,402 237,574 840,510 (Zone Administration 164,601 164,605 131,840 106,450 208,190 277,240 1,052,926 I Total Operating Expenses `• 52.101.137.52.143.983 ! 51 566241 1 5715.276 i 52.377.945 53.253.105 i S12,157,687 Capital Expenses 5604,602 U7.1,014 5584,191 5378,675. �. _ . $425,460 t �Busas Required for Operations 5571,013 $571,014 $584,191 $378,675 $425,460 S699,050 $3;229,403 Buses idled from Court Stay 33,589 0 0 0 0 0 33.589 13us Lease Expenses p.. 5604,602 U7.1,014 5584,191 5378,675. �. _ . $425,460 t SS99,050 1 3,2b2.'0112 I Totai Expenses 152.705.739 52,714,997 $2,150,132 51,093,951 $2903.105 53:952,155 1 I 315,420,679 iRevenues-Expenses 5514,733 $505,475 i (5;,628,790) SO I 52.960,937 i i 52.601,516 1 St.853,?71 1LACTC Additional Subsidy SOI SO 50 $0 SO I SO I 50 j ,,Net Revenues 5514,733 1 $505,475 l (51,628,790)1 $0 ( 52,960,937 I 52,501,516 1 $4,853,871 j 01 -Apr - April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Proposition A Revenue Estimates Alternative B Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain Existing Service Service Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount Express 19,635 $67.91 $1,333,413 Local 53,205 $47.47 $2,525,641 Total- .:..Pt'ag.AI7isc:reiiona:;.;>:.:::;, Prop. A Disc:etionary :;.;=:;:.::53,$58,0.•4 SSCP Lines' Service Annual Amount Local ! Exp I Prop. A Funds s0 I Total `{ SQ Line 210 Express" Service Annual Amount Express !!' Prop. A Incentive S6 -,C,088 5% Contrib i Prop. A Local Return SSd,69S Total S6c"4,7i Operate Lines 187, 480181 & 482 Service Rev Hrs Rate/Hr Annual Amount Express 102.469 $67.91 56,958,670 j Local 33,315 $47.47 $1,581,463 Total Prop. A Disc:etionary $8,540,133 's No Prop A Discretionary or Incentive funds are identified for this service. " A Joint 5-Y0 local contribution from corporate pass sales are identified for this service. assumes ',4C7C P�ccosition A Incentive Fending of $610,088. -1 �- April 4, 1991 Ti W I I L -- C') April 4, 1991 (3) w1 6r) 4m C41— 11V r - CD ON 03 I 40 co: M� I C41 I,- (D m 4a� cc to C) mIT I C) . -T O Q . W) C) mr . .. -. co Mlto -: l- C4 CD m C4 (M M I C) I C41 cr) 69 40 49 413, 4& 49 4 (a 03 Im cm Go 'D it* co IT I i N -�r C14 t- CO Go WICOV) CI:V- N C.) C-3 C'J I I L -- C') April 4, 1991 N -15- April 4, 1991 ti n ti cv c' C7 C1 � .y Q �I 104 to Qto I 49 4%1 i 69 Fp. � to { to I E r r u) W LWr � � v ��Q) niC►iico c,Em I 'C' CI 01) _ i9 i i CM N ' CI d 1 VI I N i r I � i � , ! I I I � i i � I m I I °° € ! co o • -: C i N k CJ I 'IT W C ! ISI Z N i a y l E9 �' 1 T cD M CO fn T I j1 Z ? O Q: Ll l10 as CO N ry, . V. J m a i LO cli 0 2 Q = c13 �! ti K o =N o " 6 L ` Q , T o 0 • + N N > 4U d Nr i 00 o %: I ;m CSD th 49 i N'_i cD N E i ami a m c — w N a� c a c a Q W Q O O N -15- April 4, 1991 0 E CV) io LO LO Ica "t c1t Z9. co 1:221 C\� fNlt C'31 OI�Z q3 co til Go co 13 C409 LTO -16- LO (0 T 'W C\j m c cwo:: N (X) f co co CD AM IQ3 I W CO (D W 114 06 Z K C\J Ir - 0 N 0 L. (M co 1-. N cn C :3 co U)m Z 0a > 0 00 oG F- cts 4) LL a) C_ LL 0 0 E CV) io LO LO Ica "t c1t Z9. co 1:221 C\� fNlt C'31 OI�Z q3 co til Go co 13 C409 LTO -16- f - co co (D 40 U? April 4, 1991 LO (0 T 'W (M co m c cwo:: N (X) f co CD AM IQ3 I CO (D W 114 '-Q) A K 69 r_ C14 E N 0 L. Lo OG m f w aD C, 1 C, 'T U13 t f - co co (D 40 U? April 4, 1991 co t N (X) f O 49 69 r_ C14 E N 0 L. C, 1 C, 'T U13 t co co r Qct co 03 F1 oG f - co co (D 40 U? April 4, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alt. B Capital Budget Fiscal Year 1991-92 (1st 6 MONTHS) Maintain Existing Service w or Monthiy annual Schedule Buses Months. Amount Amount 1 15 6 $30,311.58 8181,869.48 2 15 6 $30,311.58 8181,869.48 3 30 6 858,452.44 5350,714.64 4 30 6 860,157.90 5360,947.40 County Buses 12 6 824,000.00 5144,000.00 Total .. 102.. Sc�33,233.50' $1,219,401,D0 Operations" 99 81,185,812 Idled 3 833,589 (2nd 6 MONTHS) Maintain Existing Service of Monthly Annual Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount 1 i 5 6 $30,311.58 5181,869.48 2 16 6 530,311.63 5181,869.48 3 30 6 558,452.As $360.714.6,1 A 30 6 500.167.90 5360,947.40 I County Buses 12 6 $24,000.00 5144,000.00 Total i 102 $203.233.50 $1,214,401.00 Operations' 102 81,219,401 Idled 0 8o Incudes 10 buses operated by the 210 Express route at an annual cost or 8378,675, plus the fleet assigned to 187, 48011, and 482 routes. -I—/- Aprii 4, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE All. B Capital Budget Continued Fiscal Year 1991-92 (12 MONTHS) BSCP LINES or Monthly Annual Lines Buses Months, Amount Amount f 492,494 7 12 $14,000.00 $168,000.00 1192194, 291/93 15 12 $34,682.59 5416,191.08 .Total.: .:.:: :;:: 548632.59: ..:;.. U84-191.08......:.. ...........:..:......... ....................�...v..._.....w. (6 MONTHS) EXPANDED SERVICE of Monthly Annual Schedule Buses Months Amount Amount 5 16 6 $40,000.00 $240,000.00 Total #,... :.� .,...o,000:aa s�,ocoa 18- April 4, 1991 Alternative B FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics ZONE _ Stan 91 '92 Peak Buses July 1991 - Date of Peak 1st 2nd Line . Operation Buses 6 mts 6 mts ag5 ( Dec. 1988 15 15 15 a98 Dec. 1988 15 15 15 178 Aug. 1989 3 4 4 185 Aug. 1989 4 4 4 274/276 Sept. 1989 5 5 5 280 Sept. 1989 3 3 3 Subtotal 45 46 46 187 July 1991 - 9 9 480/481 July 1991 - 25 30 482 Jan. 1992 - - 12 30 Subtotal 0 34 51 486 486 July 1992 July 1992 - - - - - - 17 17 i6 16 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 Subtotal ..0 0: 0 '91 Total Buses '92 Total Buses 1st' '2nd - 6 mts . 6 mts 17 16 4 4 5 4 17 17 i6 16 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 50 51 51 - 10 10 - 28 33 - - i4 ;89 ' 108 0 0 0 Subtotal ; . ZONE .45 80 97 3 'f'50 ;89 ' 108 Zone Express 30 55 72 6 33 61 80 Local 15 25 25 1 17 _ 28 28 BSCP 492 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 494 Oct. 1990 3 3 3 1921194 Jan. 1991 6 6 6 291 /293 Jan. 1991 6 6 1 6 Subtotal 18 18 18 210 EXPRESS 210 Expr. May 1991 9 9 9 4 1 7 r 22 22 22. 10 10 10 GRAND TOTAL 1 -721 107 124 82 121 .140 TOTAL Express 45 1 70 87 50 78 97 Local 27 1 37 37 32 J 43 43 -19- April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Alternative A Budget Summary Fiscal Year 1991-1992 (12 Months) ! (12 Months) ; (12 Months) j Maintain I Operate ° Operate Existing BSC? f=oothill E Full— service ull—Service Routes 270 E Operation:..: I t Revenues Fare Box and Pass Revenue 52,581,890 , 5521,5,12 I 3429,165 1 53,532,697 Proposition A Discretionary Funds3,853,054 51,605,552 0 54,698 i 3,913,752 Proposition A Incentive Funds 0 1,715,126 I 610,088 2,325,214 Total Revenue $6,440,944 $2,236,768 $1,093.951. S9,771,663 vucIauIIy 1,142,027 584,191 1 378,675 2,104,893 (Buses Idiea from Court Stay Express Lines 495 and 498 51,605,552 - - 51,605,552 l I Local Lines 178,185, 27416, 280 2,028,258 - - 2,028,258 SSCP Lines 192194, 291193, 492, 494 1 - 1,321,424 - 1,321,424 Express Line 210 Express I - - { 579,373 579,373 Total Operating Contracts j $3,633,810 $1,321,424 I ff 5579,373: $5,534,607 RTD Support Contract 282,104 112,977 I 29,453 424,534 Zone Administration 544,788 218,176 106,450 869,414 Total Operating Expenses i $4,460,702 1 51,652,577 i $715,276 = $6',828,555: !iCapitai c-xoenses Buses Required for Operations 1,142,027 584,191 1 378,675 2,104,893 (Buses Idiea from Court Stay i 918.100 0 0 918.100 Bus Lease Expenses (. $2,060,127 ;.. $584,191 i $378,675 i $3,022,993 I Total Expenses 36,520,829 52,236,768 51,093,951 ! 59,851,548 Revenues -Expenses I (s79,885) I so � s0 ; (579,885) LACTC Additional Subsidy $79,885 s0 so ( 579,885 Net Revenues: ( $0 f s0 I. s0 i $0 I -��- April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Zone Proposition A Revenue Estimates Alternative A Fiscal Year 1991-1992 Maintain Existing Service Service J. Rev-Hts RatelHr Annual'Amount. Express 19,635 $67.91 $1,333,413 1 Local , 53,205 $47.,17 32,525,64 Tota! i. - Prom A Discretionary: S;31859,054 SSCP Lines` Service Annual Amount i Local ! Exp I Prop. A Incentive $1,773,581 Line 210 Express"' i Service Annual Amount j j Express I Prop. A Incentive 3610,088 ! 50/0 Contrio I Prop. A Local Return 354,698 Total # + $664,786 No Prop A Discretionary funds are identified for this service. Assumes L ACTC Proposition A Incentive Funding of $1,773,581. A joint 5% local contribution from corporate pass sales are identified for this service. Assumes LACTC Proposition A Incentive Funding of $610,088. `1- April 4, 1991 Z a� N O N CCI r V5 Q rA r Z c o� J �(D CL >- = Q O V H N (n cz 11 L U N d' W iv. O V) cM J C') q) L (D O N CO Lei Iri .Q al cr) M 10 LO C0 1O cr- M Q7 'X N N' m � N C m C: X LLI C7 Q1 N Ca CD In y Q O 110 O U cn N tI M 1-141 m co 1-- <D 'Q ua iia r N tT iG l al N 'r y CO r O MINI 1 CI r rI I ' to a In NI co CT I y cn Cn l � I uo C,3 ca aI Icc N ` t� N p N d' W iv. O V) cM J C') q) L (D O N CO Lei Iri .Q al cr) M 10 LO C0 1O cr- M Q7 'X N N' m � N C m C: X LLI -22- r r Cn CM ;F I r O C7 N lt7 N --I-Cn O :cn N r LtN'al a v CD Ln 1 40 to 4a K K wjcj ej iia W i CD <D C) I Ul T' Q In W * ICI) Q v n <D (0.1111 t0 r r riU'i+ca C) m d1 v 1 co O C C! CD C Q f� m t[]N I <D Ln N M I cn cn Cn v W iia va <HI'' c'7 I-- ch N I C1 N IL rI C7 a) co CD I N CD Q m Cn <D I+ co cn c*) CV) + .. 6a <a 69 V.l Lo -Wc qr, 1.'`p 0 11 1Cri I v O N m N Ha O 0 O O N <!a CD r v? a� LD O ch ira 03 r 69 to N C O N O U) vi fF) April 4, 1991 m C -22- r r Cn CM ;F I r O C7 N lt7 N --I-Cn O :cn N r LtN'al a v CD Ln 1 40 to 4a K K wjcj ej iia W i CD <D C) I Ul T' Q In W * ICI) Q v n <D (0.1111 t0 r r riU'i+ca C) m d1 v 1 co O C C! CD C Q f� m t[]N I <D Ln N M I cn cn Cn v W iia va <HI'' c'7 I-- ch N I C1 N IL rI C7 a) co CD I N CD Q m Cn <D I+ co cn c*) CV) + .. 6a <a 69 V.l Lo -Wc qr, 1.'`p 0 11 1Cri I v O N m N Ha O 0 O O N <!a CD r v? a� LD O ch ira 03 r 69 to N C O N O U) vi fF) April 4, 1991 W z Qf v c7 N N r N P. C c O C7 Qf N r` O Q *- CL Q > CO C) Cl) : I.L. 2 (� L Q 409. 49 a.> >. _J Q o a 'f{ff f E FF Q O OMM O I U- W L v Nlf�r CO QEtCIilclli m E O U C Q C G 0 O NtN! U, <Q t C);�i r m cc cm: N NILA: m C m G X !L Q C cc m 17— Lo o -23- CO C)I co C I h1 N C0 r fqI LO co O Ni. f as ! Imtri F H ai f f k i cn co Ir CDI 10 O1 t` r im LO: �Lo tn! N N! CA 69 t C0 cO i t ! O C7t I� tJf jM m! IO N cm M t7' c*� N U) Q9. Q O ai co413. (D I v N co CO CO 'T'l co N C I O 64 4g j 64 I Co Q st V N I N 00 rn1 O V C'J lij cA Lo Ch co m K} 6}I co c° N N tr C7 m O Q N � N N April 4, 1991 a y Q7 O ca O C O v ,c c m C.C U') Nr cc E O C cc C O O ca m Qf v c7 N r .er P. r O N ch O C7 Qf N r` O y CO O to CO O ttn Q mQ' Q LO Qf !r V co to N W O f c6( O Cf€t�EN N eet� M, 409. 49 iR (4 W iejr' 6% r. :4& 1 { 'f{ff f E FF Q 1 c0 �I�1 N coiQ I 01Q !. v Nlf�r CO QEtCIilclli NN NfQ(7M,! -C4NmCO CO C)I co C I h1 N C0 r fqI LO co O Ni. f as ! Imtri F H ai f f k i cn co Ir CDI 10 O1 t` r im LO: �Lo tn! N N! CA 69 t C0 cO i t ! O C7t I� tJf jM m! IO N cm M t7' c*� N U) Q9. Q O ai co413. (D I v N co CO CO 'T'l co N C I O 64 4g j 64 I Co Q st V N I N 00 rn1 O V C'J lij cA Lo Ch co m K} 6}I co c° N N tr C7 m O Q N � N N April 4, 1991 a y Q7 O ca O C O v ,c c m C.C U') Nr cc E O C cc C O O ca m W Z ON Ch m CV C J -o m T n Q T Q L�� I o CC to : to i3O ifi I I Ja) J I 0— cz CZ `n CL O O LL p I n :'1 to C m Ch N N I O. L�� I :.+. to to : to i3O ifi I I VIP. iii I LO i to LO Iy � I N C :Olml I� I to C m -24- April 4, 1991 1 N N I L�� I I eR !y O I m '+ N �m C I N I� I ::m m m CV) I' yl N ! ZlIQI oe 1 3I �Cn1�� Q -24- April 4, 1991 FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE Alternative A Capital Budget Fiscal Year 1991-92 Maintain Existing .1-3ervic-3, Includes 10 buses operated by the 210 Express route at an annual lease cost of S378,675. -25- April 4, 1991 of Monthly. Annual Schedule IBuses Months Amount Amount 1 15 12 530,311.58 $363,738.96 2 15 12 $30,311.58 $363,738.96 3 30 12 558,452,44 $701,429*211 4 30 12 $60,157.90 5721,894.80 County Buses 12 12 524,000.00 $298,000.00 Total:..'.- 102-=3=3.50 ........... . ........ $2,438X2.00: Operations* 61 $1,520,702 Idled 41 5918,100 BSCP Lines of Monthly Annual Lines Buses Months Amount Amount" 492,494 7 12 51 Q.000.00 5 68,000.00 192194, 291/93 15 12 534,882.59 5416,191.08 Tctai 22 518,582.59 9584,191.08 Includes 10 buses operated by the 210 Express route at an annual lease cost of S378,675. -25- April 4, 1991 Alternative A FY '92 Budget Bus Characteristics � DNE '97 '92 'g1 -92 S Peak Peak Tota! Total Date of Buses Buses Buses Buses Line OPStarr ation 495 Dec. 1988 15 15 17 16 17 16 498 Dec. 1988 15 15 4 4 5 178 Aug. 1989 3 4 4 a 185 Aug. 1989 4 5 274/276 Sept. 1989 3 3 4 4 280 Sept. 1989 46 j 50 51 I Subtotal 45 E _ - - 1 -- 4 . , 0 Subtotal 0, 486 _ I -488 _0 0__ 0 Subtotal ;; ;0 s, ' Subtotal": 30 30 33 Zone Express 15 16 17 18 Local SSCP 3 ' i aa2 I Oct. 1990 i 1990 ; ? -19 '1 C �1921194 an. 1991 b I 8 g 6 6 2911293 Jan. 1991 16 18 2? 23 . Subtotal 210 EXPRESS 9 10 10 210 Expr. May 1991 a2 GRAND 5 50 50 TOTAL Express I 27 28 32, Local 26 April 4, 1991 Foothill Transit Administrative Budget Assumptions 1. Roger Chapin is promoted from Deputy Executive Director to Executive Director, effective July 1, 1991. 2. Bill Forsythe will relinquish the position of Executive Director, but retain involvement as Management Advisor. Corporate support by Forsythe & Associates, Inc. is budgeted at 15 hours per week at the rate of $125 per hour. (Bill was budgeted at 50% time for FY 91, but actually contributed more than 100% of a normal work week to Foothill Transit.) 3. The salary and benefits package budgeted by Foothill Transit for the Deputy Executive Director, Roger Chapin, at $76,200 for FY 91 was insufficient to cover the Forsythe & Associates costs of $83,792 for this position. The FY 92 Foothill Transit budget for the Executive Director is based on Roger's actual FY 91 salary, plus a 5 % increase, plus benefits. 4. Adel Santillan is budgeted in the Forsythe & Associates corporate support rate of $125 per hour, rather than as a direct Foothill Transit expense. A new administrative assistant will be hired for Foothill Transit. This is a net increase in direct and indirect administrative staff to support Foothill Transit. 5. A new Deputy Executive Director/Senior Analyst will be hired in conjunction with implementation of the next group of lines, after a favorable Appellate Court decision that allows their operation. An additional Operations Supervisor position will be added at the same time. 6. Direct expenses (such as office supplies, air travel, mileage, parking, postage, etc.) which were borne by Forsythe & Associates will be charged separately to Foothill Transit effective July 1, 1991. The Forsythe & Associates overhead rate (covering computer equipment, payroll processing, liability insurance, workers' comp insurance, office rent, supplies, cellular phone equipment and service charges, etc.) has been reduced from 15 % to 12.5 % on all costs. 7. The audit for FY 92 will be conducted and paid under the LACTC's evaluation of Foothill Transit. Public Information programmed expenses will be increased by 25 % in the base budget (Alternative A) over FY 91 for baseline operations. An additional $50,000 will be spent on consulting services to perform line -by-line analyses, route modifications and other needs as determined by the Executive Board. -27- April 4, 1991 AGENDA NO. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: April 12, 1991 MEETING DATE: April 16, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Contract for Recreation Services, between the City of Diamond Bar and the City of Brea. The City of Diamond Bar has provided recreation services to the community, during Fiscal Year 1990-91, through its participation as a member of the Walnut Valley Recreation Authority. However, the Authority is terminating its operations, effective June 30, 1991. As a result, the City requested proposals from other public and private agencies, regarding the provision of contract recreation services, for Fiscal Year 1991-92. Three agencies, City of Brea, County of Los Angeles and Walnut -Diamond Bar YMCA, responded to the City's request, by submitting recreation services proposals. Through a proposal review panel, each of the proposing agencies were given the opportunity to make presentations and were interviewed. The proposal review panel recommended the City of Brea to be the contract agency for providing recreation services, to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Subsequently, the Parks and Receation Commission recommended to the City Council that the City of Diamond Bar and the City of Brea negotiate an agreement for recreation services. At its February 19, 1991 meeting, the Council directed staff to negotiate an agreement for the provision for recreation services, with the City of Brea. Staff has concluded negotiations, with Brea staff. The negotiation objective was to provide a recreation program in Fiscal Year 1991-92, at approximately the same net cost as the Fiscal Year 1990-91 recreation program, which was $182,000. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ 283,411 ($23,700 = FY91 ; $259,711 = FY92) Budgeted Amount $ 182,000 = FY91 ; $259,711 = FY92 In Account Number: Deficit: $ 6,700 (165,000 (WVRA) + $23,700 (Brea) = 188,700 - $182,000) Revenue Source: General Fund RSVED BY : --- �h -L,Z ��----------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belan City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager RECREATION PAGE TWO The proposed, negotiated contract for recreation services provides for programs and services, which includes; -Contract Classes -Youth and Adult Sports Programs -Tiny Tots -Youth and Adult Excusions -Rent-A-Santa Program -Concert-In-The-Park Series (5 Concerts) -Staff support for Council, Commission, recreation, athletic, cultural activities. The total contract amount is $283,411. Taking into consideration that projected revenues are $130,000, the net recreation services contract amount is estimated to be $153,411. The contract will paid in twelve monthly payments of $23,618. Diamond Bar will purchase and retain ownership of recreation program supplies and equipment, which are estimated to cost $13,450. It is estimated that the rental and/or lease of school facilities (WVUSD and PUSD) for recreation program activities will cost $30,000. Finally, recreation program brochures will cost an estimated $13,500, for quarterly mailings with the community newsletter. Taking all recreation program costs into account, the total net recreation services program cost should be approximately $210,400. During the recent discussion of the proposed contract with the City Council, staff indicated that the proposed gross contract amount was $282,000. However, subsequent to the staff presentation, it was discovered by Brea that minor position classification and compensation changes were needed (Account Clerk I to Account Clerk II; additional compensation, $1,411). Also, staff indicated that all recreation program related revenue was to accrue to Diamond Bar. Again, since the April 9, 1991 worksession, Brea has asked that Diamond Bar reconsider the revenue sharing proposal, where the Cities share, on a 50%-50% basis, revenues over a threshold amount of $130,000 (not including Prop A reimbursements). The cost sharing proposal is designed to provide promotional and marketing incentives to the Brea staff. Diamond Bar staff would recommend both of the proposed changes. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Contract for Recreational Services, between the City Of Diamond and the City of Brea, in the amount of $283,411; and, allocate $6,700 from the General Fund Reserve to fund the FY91 payments, under the Contract. Fr'E'^.'f VA, XO 17L+RVICG8 AGREEMENT This Agresment is rude arvi en -::red into t hie 11 ,'�i day of April, 1991, bei ween the :'?TY Cr Dl?,MOND BP -R, a Municival Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 11 D1, :,1QND BAR") and the CITY OF BREA, a Municipal Corpora . CheaeiAnafter to Z,.s "BREA"). A. Recites. ij t? F,:Cilti� ,,i? r::•3� }1 F3: i' ",a <� �' J4;•�L_ed its Peq,.,ost for Pibposd1 pertaining to the 1err,�� anc.e of profes, 'io :a'4 services with respect the to p oviaion yea racrY?ration service1_t ("Pro C. ca et hereinafter), a full, :.rue correClt copy Cf c•:hic.',^ is attache hereto as Exhibit "A" unit by this reference r,-6ds a :art (ii) BRZA has nov s„ib7-;_1.,ted its prcpasal for the performance of s)- Cch ..._zrvif:es, a foil, tri:tt., and ovrre� .': copl.of which is attached "B" ar:d this reference made a part. hersof. . (ii.f) u:�.'SJ:iD 3 A.R r>i}ss tc, �etain ,=ypak to y z fcr all services necessary, including advice and assistetnCe to DTAtMOND BAR, DIAMIOND BAR°s City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission anal s:.a%f in t': s -.nplement:ati.on of P ;.-o ect . (iv) BPE A .-(-.presents t t•ai it is qualified to per form such sore .',�!5 and is 'wrilling to perforn such serviOeS Ci, hereinafter defined. 1 NOW, IHEI:EPt��.L, it is agreed ty and betv-een. D:. n,-IO�3D BAR and BREA as follows: S. LcLr e6LIe— t_. she follo.'Ana definitions shall apply to the following t.erri--, except ,here the context cf this Agreement otherwise reg1::ire s: (a)Project: The pr-ovis::on of recreatic-- ser:'ices 6es(; ibed in Exhibit "All hQreto includirq, but not limited to, progrars, policles, at;h+8t•ic programs, ezc,L1rsiOns, classes, the pre ;ir. inion of s�.zrveys, and zc•cur:t-nrs, the presentation, both arc i and in rf slash surveys, reports and d( cur—„arts to r' .ANCDND VA:,' a'nd cttt!�a-6z% e at any and all troy}; sessions, hearings and Othereetin3r conducted Iny Dl'i'MI NID LAR wii... ''£'sir '- s tv the provision of BAR's recreation (b) Services: Such as are necessary to be perforr:led by BREA .in order to inplenent. the Project. (a) RREy shall fort,' ', itn. to i� .ltit-.ert. the Project in c'icc,",rd an,;e with "A” and '''C" .Clt'-Z'et--O arkra all in accordance wir:. Fel erzil, State all. -d DIA&ICIND P.;%R statut(>s, regulations, ord:nancrs acj'-i.CE:': in es, all to the r.Gas nnabl:. satisfacition of DIAMOND PAR - 2 (b} BREA shall supply copies of all s.uWvr~ys, reports, plans and documents (Hereinafter collectively referred to as Inc.'►`t:" ing all 41--ecnnical docw,..ients az; deze''ribel-: 3r, "All caiid "51* to DIA11,01M C;:P, in accordance, Tr.ith tbc' requ].2"et',Cnt- of Exhibit ;IAif. --Or i<S of t -him doCti:' ent- st'1' } i h,, -4 1`.l 5'.� •1 T:+.!:, i i�; 5 as are rp-quired Ifhff . DI BAR nav thipreaf: P -C V e", an -1 f-),z-w�'.rd to c.omrtents regarding said d',;G .IT,E?il`.:5 an :I ORE ShaI l t}1v'7eaftg--r such revs j Olis tc fi ' l-1 :iu = : '-�1' ._ ;1:i ar'i DIA: C;ND BEAR shell receive revised docurents i-: s,- f�h forn and in the qaantities deter r iT^ed neOcessary by DIA.I:UIND BA • The t —e- 1 imit;s set forth pursuant to this section B2. (b) ray bre extended upon writton -Yf Lt? . ' t:D BAP.. (C:) :SR -'-'i si-,aJ.I, at. 3.RFAIS S, -.)Ie o!:'S t`, anC! e"}:pCx15e, Secure and hit zx su(-.. e -c n? ; as i,.;ay1 tri t:'''_ -ti 0piT,—I of 13RZA, Y,e ne:_vosar`1 4_.r tl.le tett--s CT C11151' In th(-- event ar: , �;:.Iti-il c�* �.s: -�ec-zo •�? G rE34c1i 1ud by � R%A, t)?7L' hereby wa>_"x"a:tc t:Iel}. 5, 1 r-�.rs0+ y; e f4:1 n ":lifIed tC, �-�X V 7f`i C::� :.. .. rE?C7tli_C.:7, -toar•t^:ii;._E'.. BREA t11G4'I1Gp" cZ(71`E?£5 tt';Ci. no subcontractor E':iall be �;y" BREA except upon the prior written approval of DIArIOIJIG BAR. 3. L IMQ.L' VAR a r es nilt�, s: (a) To pay BREA a n.a%iinium surf of T-venty Three Thousand Five H,,-indred :)ollars rer r:onth, for the perforr,ian e of t:hL s -?r lc�is require! herQ..�nwe,-. Said Sur. shall 3 cover the cost of all staff t`L e and all othe-- dirract and indirect costs or fees, includir�j the t.,ork of employoes, consultants and subcontractors to BR A. Payr ent to BREA, by DIAt.OND CSAR, rr,all see 9 4 to the sche-e :le set forth below. (.�!) FG�ys�l�'a�U:? �. (�• .t'j�Fr .n7 t'�'�.� {. F1C 1_.(i e by €:Jhr''_p'1�: in accordance with the invoices submitted t --,y BREA, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid L.,ithin a reasonable time after said invoices are received by DIA11,0211D BAR. All Chla:.ges shall be in vith B -Z A's p•--c-pos.al either ,.:ith rest:Yct to hourly Yates or lCnkp :7um. a,,",-Dmnt:s ;Cr individual programs. (G) Addition"" Paj.iients for 1d.ditiv'lai services requested, in hyl C71.A2•`OND BAP, and nJt ]SiC�iuded in BREA's propozal as s_t fo',-th %r: BxtzzL ; t. "B" ?ier&of, shall h_E paid on a. reimburse—ment !!� ?a.: ''tn the fee sc el --le set forth in said. Exhibit "C". Cgarges for ad6itio-nalservices shall be invoiced on a ronthl•.' basis and shall be. paid by DIAMOND BAR within a reasonable time after said Lnvoices are received by i DIA110ND BAR. (d) Any and all revenues collected by BREA from rocreation pro: jramr participant:, shall be promr)tly tendered to DIAMOND BAR in .v.J7:h adtnlnistrat-ive policies and procedures ester-bl islued by DIATJONC; SAR's, City Manager. 4 . iTe�''�(}°�'�' S1�_P r C;�"vFs a t� provi,:�e to 8RFA; (a) and assist.arce as set forth in Exhibit "All hereto. (ht) Copies Cf and ot.h,�- infOl.--Ation, as available, whicl? nc-cps8aLV in girder to colrpii:te the Project. (c) ,4. zta!t; nft r',T,. ttion as is generally c" vailmbie fro: DIAMOIZD BAR files ap p-licable to the r^ro;ect. (d) Assi^tar,ve, if. r»rry:ary, it cbtainir:a infor:ratitar, frti. c iT•�± ;u + _ �<, :�rt.a3 a_ �.:wi�s n,-7/ r private Parties. However, I.4 Shall 1"i3 re-- I'Drtsibiilty to 7^a ;2 all initial Coma(::"_ with -...) {ta �'?-�e ri7:C3 eDf surf . lnfornation, 5. QA'llt?Y_t7'ijY3 !'_? All nr«'1:'ir31:4S, data, studies, su rveye, draiGir,C s, a G' e"+ tnt, g .a ...t:S, i.l :atiSr t i;;t.v�i3.f�r1Sti:l•ti rE'jJot"tS prepared by BRE'a'purs1.2_ nt t^ this F.gret,r;(�->;1f sl,al2• he considered the property of DIAI,1014'D BAR and, upon payment for sexvices performed by BREA, t';ucb .�. czar rr:"..: �r_d o,,hGT• ida,.t.ified x.:aLE_ia s shall be dei iv8red +,-o pZA'ibr,L BAR by BREA. BREA TM.ay, however, iTa}:$ d1i: YE`=lxtl L_�>lC}: colnies of sai,-i d+?C'tl .'E _it and na`erials as BREI- may desire. G, Petr. ti3tion: .�t .s kgiiee ent, or any progran or service pravide3 her nay be terr nat;ed by C)1!-2'!c;ND BAR upalt the giving Of eS .tirit,t'$:l ;`�` tit ice O ?r;T4ir:ati.b*1'' to BRE?. .fit. l aSt thirty (30) day's prJor :c3 t h<T , C1t , of t-.r'.-,dnaticn �nc, f'i1 Cd `- 5 said Notice. In the event this Agre*,3-ment, or any or service provided h(rczurkde-r. Is so �n;_.,A shall be COMrel-,Sated aL DR -c -A's ra-,n 2S �specified hell -ell n, 0---- PrO-rated proqrar or servl;,e as the cac.e r�,cty bc_-, pro -rated on the hasis of: a thIrty day ricnth. In r1c) everit-, however, shall BREA receive inure than the. maximus specif3ed in paragraph 3(a), above or Exhibit as applicable. BREA shall provide to any ancl all data, surveys, dra-,"inIgs, nays, phctclraphs, reports, 1 --`-,ether in draft or finFil fcin, 101/ VREA as of the date _7,i t erm JL nat ion. inay r, --t terFL-Iin-tte rhis Agte_e;Tient e3 -:C pt for cause. 7. ?i;^T'icL!ts '.n,_' y g k,nY a n I all notices, deni,.nds, Lnv--_�?c_es ard written the parties he-�eto ad,r reit ,edi as set. forth in this paragraph 7. Thee: inr' furtheriirore, shall br, I those persons pri-s,,ai_"ily for th;:� pprfocrzance, b� thf� 4 parties undo: _ this Agre_'!1�ent: ROBERT L. VAN City Manner City of Dlannd Bar 21660 E. Copley, SoLt,,lrjc)l Diamond Bar, C -A 917 sus City Yanager city of Brea one civic centei, Circle. Brea, CA 92621 Ally Such 'notices, denand5, and %.,rritten (,D!Tmunications, by ,hail, sh a 11 he d,-.:eined -o ha vr- 'be, s, t-, r�- ceeve' l tin e ar) ,.I rl�-> S � a forty-eight (48) ),oi.:rs after dipcs4_t the.ceof in the United States, mail, postage pro -paid a!j,-A r:�,,.:q_-erly sGt forth alc.;ove. C 6 BRE -A silty l l neither ccr,n snc.e wort: t.1rcler this A.greerent until it teas of r-aincd all insu_ranc:e requited hers an�?er in a comp—try or�o span iGs acceptal-)Ie to Gln. ND DAR nor shall BREA allow any subc-ortractc , irC .-o'=once cr, a. subcontract unt l i. a 1 iC1S LT diiCt r.--- I? r,c, i ctf ti, c-, subcon tracto, h1 s been obtaire:I. FPEA s! -tall t, .z yA .').,t a.tai maintain at all during the term of this ,.ts ...L �: *'1� follo inn; policies cf insurance ber-jinn int .rvr.,, � .I?", s - I! t',: r = i s, i tc• DIAMl' ,.'N D B' -.R a ci: rt if .f~ate of !? as pro -of th-' + xL has a moi: crit F l % compensation :al _ pe—ri �3ns, t h,a::i it nay er-._p o_. dire,otly or thro.igh t ..�t_',1:'.' .i ttit,S° S L.t (-a?"-1 111!1 c:?" t r. e ."ork specified hear r i w- 7 ii at'<? :''i_�rt::ti � r•'l.l i'; tht? laws of t;-te Stat : of California. ',,J th the ru.'is;ions of C'allfo�? nla Lai -;ox. Code Section 370Y7ji sh;l,'11 :he payr,ent of {7t:1 Gils7t..C.t1 to hisel: ,...�. u.4�.-..'S ��iti'j to Yt'l.rk shall sign and file a certification as foslcws; i71. ar,. ac.'ar�� Q. t11; ix ..':'? , i or7S of SC _ Aon 37uO of :_ai;or Code which require e= ery tc Vic? insvn7i',ti £iG'atTfc.f li,tbilit1' for workers' CC•i11 )tr3a"i1C•il Ct to i?lv`E'T_'t-a.i;'ti sn, f irisurance in accordance, writ.11 the Co er and I ;F I � l CC�:fiTJlti _ with such provis C)t:s the perf'orr:ance of t'he work of this Ag�GVYr,pt�t°' 7 i_t'thil ty and PzTpt_1ert�y i;trOl:gY C7':L the tern of t�'.his Agrt.c'r n}, at: sole cost and £s}_pensa, BREA shall keep, or cause to 1:e kept, in full force and effect, for the nutua1 b e refit o` r)i BAT, at1 -. 5RFA, cormprehensive, Lroad form, general publi^ i L5bilit:y antia2itGit=%;t i�E? i 1 11 atC�=;grain3t Clair. -s and liabilities for irji:ry, de""::th, or property damage arising f3 or, B • 3,,'s a:l.1V 1 �1As, pro -v ding proteC:r-icn of a -t least Ons million, r`ol ars � � t1 �t,t'C�C.(;�1i for hc�<:.ly 7.T'.11'.ry Or death to any o~,e person or .:or anv one nr.•cleent �,r and at least One Million Dollar ' �1., j(1Q, t�n�„ CC,'. for property (C;I Ge 1 t'?i I:t�iir:t,.Ct" �_? ul' FV'iTE )LS nll ins': i-ance required by eXrresr� _-s T e t E -: ,a1 _ arric.:= only in responS;tlr i'nsora.nce aj.Csti` ed to do �,1cLi1t�S in the State E:•r' <�'al ifo n:.? ar ,3 ro' S.c +-_. re t.iired uncter pa acjrciph S. (a) and (b) insureds DIM,?'0,;Lz FIAR, its elected officials, off cars, �, 1,�1t�s, a.7ents and representatives. All polic.i-:s :': ai3 coi,,tai_n languakje, to the effect that: (1) the inS'irer }hes Yiqht of s}.2brocfati:sn i against Dj1?i':i)jitJ �'1'':�: aj,d Ii1 et:`.C}?•i i '.t<.' Ei electle o fi!: ? all' officers, en.pioyees, agents and (2) t IQ - policies ;re end ':it}= an,- insurar.oe" `ha. t may be carried by DIA!,.O ID BAR; a.r:d they can, -Lot canceled or 'materially changed except of c r. thi.rly ; 30; days' notice by th:il insurer to L11A1°IONI) BAR bfGE's'' if -'ed :'tiil5 , BRE: , sh-all f"Urltith DIA ONID BAR i;rith copa.es ai all such poli:�!ies- pror,.ptly upon 8 e receipt of then, or certificate evi.uen i n g the .insurance. BREA nay effect for its own av,,aunt insurance not un -del, th-is Agreement. 11) r,c.Ui=t1''�:e Foie ')r uses Gf this `C@B:tE'i the teiin rliC:su Z'anc,:-)Il shill ICiC '1C'e a :tea t'��Tl Sli!"u�i'C'B is 1't1'j=t Si approved by Vln-,".OND BAR. indemnify and save har.rl.e_°s aAR, it* elect -ed ali appointed officials, cffic--er s an1l NI'.j1lOveiEs, fr.. =' all liability Iron d,-vtit le; or iil jury to per Sons cr pi:operty, includinq the Ise" EIRI; ? of a-,, and all an,,l attorneys' f,•es, in any arisl_ g out of the acts anrj•;r oriissi.ons of BREN pursuant to t-.`1i.s Agree:;ient, .inc•luain-;, but nct limited to, all. t.r-;ls equ�,"t l,?,. a..:.c}es, to the .: aa.f.:« m pernitteci by iaw. 10. ��s_ ;`nr_ :? tic: .ss i c:r,:. �?.t of thi- A(� eanent Or of 3:i art Cr obi c .Dn of C e _d y-. shall r y" p �. i �:�t �: �:z Yrt.rtt��:. � t ���?_. Fs ha i;� a;t...; either in who -le o :.'i �'•.:L, by E -RE s "'I yQr t,a f consent of DIAMOND BAR. 11. Loj cL,) §ei - i tliY.c".Ci:GY he partll -o =jre that BREA c"it'd its E?"t�lC)a�'kY5, cffi^,�'rs and a.cjeni `: are rndC --pend,&nt contractors uni:er this and sl$iall not be con"tru i.i for any purpose to be er5 lay eris at MPI-ICIND w 12. Governina Law: Tl-,iis Agreement- shall be governed by and constr:iej in Accor, -Dance wtli the ln.rs of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Feeti_ Tn Gf.--� event any legfal proceeding is instituts�Ld tc: enfQ ce any term or provision of the Ag;r oe'Iment, the pY t' -,v a 1 7.nq jyarty in said le -gal -roce2'iin q shall he entitled try :t-zcever attorneys' fces aril cysts from the opp.-�t iter party in an ai-,i7un d,3'Lerrir:ed I -y the ooL;7"l`, t, be— re'aso Ab=e. 14. U' AC7V C;Is p•.li E or i;o;lti"i '. E:rSy 4t"l •li under this h`���� ... ''4 � ea -r i7i t '.>i:rt<'-':t Fl with any (,f the t,_ .'.C,S and conditions her end, <tlm-1 i. see, . ; fe-rred b1 the p-irtiES hereto .for mediation. A third parity, ne)attA srAlr rice shall be selected, as ngreec! k}y h� --- :art, -as and the ,%':�ts a.ir,d exr,ensss thei-f-of Shall be b:)rr 6 by t hz} gear y itan he.-eto. In the eveilt h-,,, r'aT : ? are i:t 5l.,l t'.oto 't ryr e- 7 the T,lediatol: to be Sks1 ?C:L:t -i h�--r, et nkler, the D1A-VO14 D BAR City Cc,',! n C i I .shall select such a meta} -a.t, t`,irt: p� _ty r.�di�� i:__. service ar-c? said City Cour:<,-_"s's de:7.i,q-:on s,".a?' bc! The parties agree I to utilize trei, effcrt5 t l� .anv dispute or Controversy so t,� ;-,.acliatio.n. it is specifical-_y und(e- yt`_oj, and-aejree6 bi, til^3 prv-ieS that rsfe:ral of an such dispute or contrr-vP-,rsy, :,,n','7 mites --,al good. Fait; esffcr t:s to resJlve the S'i.e thert;!ny, shA 1. of Cc,nditions pve:edant to :.he institution of any act:'.on oA ?,xc t �::ir:> js, whether at lr. r or in equity %,dlth respect to any &iSp--,,te or coritlbvt�--Sy. 3.0 15. 111n This :,hal'L he in effect fron May 1 1991 thr-'-1ah 'tipci jr"-jI.'djv Ig Apr' Agi.-E.-p—,nent supersel:S zu-1y and all other nitji,?r c -,r in writing, bt-tt5..,een the parties witn respec.C: 4:.o Chc- rnattttr Each party to this Agreenent ackricwl-I(- that ri,�- ores ��knta [tat -Jon on by _ny party 1. a r which is not h8ri:--xt,, ):Cr any other agjreene.nt, st a t e i i t ,--,r pronist�t not czwjtakineJ it r-Ms s'jail be, valid and biml ing. Any -!if icn, c)f :hd Only if it Parties 1i,' WIT"ESS 'VTHLERE�)F, part lee -5 hjj-eto I -,ave e: this pcjree.�je-t as of ye-, _1 r- fjr_ t a;) '. -e A -A"I L S" I . ATTEST, N k 10 3 1 CA" %DB26, -21AI 526 . 2 3 1 i CITY OF BREA City Cler]; CT'-IY OF DIA11.10ND BAR City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF DIAMOND BAR STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR RECREATION SERVICES The City Clerk of the City at her office in the City November 28, 1990, sealed above described services. I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR of Diamond Bar, California will receive Hall, in said City, until 4:00 p.m. on proposals for the performance of the Gary H. Werner, Mayor John A. Forbing, Mayor Pro Tem Phyllis E. Papen, Councilmember Paul V. Horcher, Councilmember Jay C. Rim, Councilmember Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager *****N O T I C E***** UPON RECEIPT OF THIS PROPOSAL, CONTACT KELLEE FRITZAL, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST, AT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR WITH THE NAME OF YOUR COMPANY, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND A FAX NUMBER AND THE NAME OF A CONTACT PERSON WITHIN YOUR COMPANY. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE CITY WITH THIS INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN IMPROPER DISTRIBUTION OF UPDATED MATERIALS REGARDING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INFORMATION NOT BEING DISTRIBUTED TO THE PROPER PERSON. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECREATION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I. GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Diamond Bar is a community of approximately sixty five thousand (65,000) people located in Southeastern Los Angeles County. In April, 1989, Diamond Bar became an incorporated city. Diamond Bar is a general law city under the Council/Manager form of government. Diamond Bar is a master -planned predominantly residential community. Diamond Bar is a typical suburban bedroom community with limited commercial or industrial land. The city owns 8 developed parks with approximately 117 acres, most of which consist of passive open space. The city also owns 2 undeveloped park sites totalling an additional 25 acres that will be developed at some future date. The developed park sites are primarily neighborhood parks with tot -lot equipment, baseball diamonds, picnic areas, security lighting and restroom facilities. Two parks have small offices and one has lighted tennis courts. The City will develop a master use agreement for use of school facilities, 1 high school, 2 junior high, 8 elementary schools. II. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS A. General Invitation of Proposals The City of Diamond Bar is seeking proposals from qualified contractors for recreation services for the City of Diamond Bar. i One (1) original and six (6) copies of all proposals must be received by the City Manager, City of Diamond Bar no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 28, 1990. Address all proposals to: Mr. Robert L. Van Nort City Manager 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 Requests for clarification or interpretations of information contained in this RFP should be directed to Kellee Fritzal at (714) 860-2489. B. Format For Proposals Contractors must adhere to the following proposal preparation guidance. Proposals will include: 1. Letter of transmittal, signed by an individual authorized to bind the proposing entity. 2. Executive Summary. 3. General Information ( i.e. company size, location of office (s), years in business, organization chart, number of staff) 4. Oualifications of Staff. 5. Outline of current programs you are providing. 6. Description of your understanding of the City's needs and a detailed plan demonstrating how you will fulfill these needs. 7. Description of the services/programs to be provided; and include samples of past/current programs, participant numbers and publicity used. 8. Proposed fee schedule. 9. Limits of general liability, professional liability and automobile liability insurance: a copy of a valid insurance certificate and proof of adequate worker's compensation coverage for subcontractor, or proof of being permissably uninsured or self insured. B. Basis of Award City Council is not obligated to award a contract and reserves the right to reject all proposals. If City Council determines to award a contract, it is not obligated to make the award to the low proposer. Other factors will be considered by the Ci�y Council such as, evidence of satisfactory performance under other contracts, financial condition, and such other evidence as might convince City Council that any one proposal would provide the most effective, economic and reliable service to the City. The award, if given, will be given within 90 calendar days after opening proposals. C. Qualifications of Proposers All proposers hereunder shall furnish satisfactory evidence to the City that they have operated or are presently operating a recreation service of the type similar to the operation described herein, and that they have successfully done so long enough that their experience will enable them to maintain operations under all conditions prevailing in this area. If they have not operated such a system, they must show that they have has sufficient experience in comparable fields or employ qualified personnel to comply with the requirement of the agreement. D. Financial Responsibility All proposers shall be required to demonstrate to the n satisfaction of the City that they have adequate financial resources to perform the services required by these specifications. No contract will be awarded to any proposer who, as determined by the City, has an unsatisfactory performance record or inadequate experience, or who at any time lacks the necessary financial resources to provide the services in strict accordance with the specifications. II. GENERAL CONTRACT ITEMS A. Term of Agreement The agreement term shall be three (3) years, subject to termination and option provisions contained herein. B. Termination of Contract Notwithstanding any other provisions of the agreement, this agreement may be terminated by the City after thirty (30) days written notice of deficiency in performance hereunder or for any other failure to comply with the terms and conditions hereof. Moreover, the City retains the right to terminate this Agreement, without cause, upon one hundred twenty (120) days written notice. In the event of termination without cause, the City agrees to promptly pay the Contractor all sums due and payable to contractor through and including the last day of work hereunder. C. Contractor to Indemnify and Hold Harmless City Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, for and from any and all loss, liability, claim, demand, action or suit, of any and every kind and description, arising or resulting from or in any way connected with any operation of Contractor in exercising any license or privilege granted to it by the contract or by any ordinance of City, or arising or resulting from the failure of Contractor to comply in all respects with contract provisions and requirements and of all applicable laws. Contractor shall, upon City's demand and at sole cost and expense, defend and provide attorneys to defend City, its officers, agents and employees, arising or resulting from or in any way connected with the above mentioned operations of Contractor or Contractor's failure to comply with the contract and with the ordinances and laws hereinabove mentioned. If City provides it own defense against any such action or suit, Contractor will reimburse City for all attorney's fees and other costs incurred by City. D. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance Neither the City Council nor any officer, employee, agent or appointee of the City of Diamond Bar, shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under the agreement. Contractor, at his own expense, shall carry liability insurance during the full term of this agreement with a company to be approved by the City Manager or representative and with City also named as an additional insured thereunder, covering liability for injuries or deaths and property damage, arising out of or in connection with the operations of the Contractor under the contract, in an amount of not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) for injuries, including accidental death to any one person, and subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount of not less than Five Million Dollars on account of one accident, and property damage in an amount of not less than Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000). Policies or certificates of said insurance, approved as above mentioned, shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after date of contract. The policy of insurance shall contain a provision stating that said insurance is primary coverage and will not be cancelable by the insure except after filing with the City Clerk, thirty (30) days written notice of any cancellation so proposed. Copies of such policy or policies or certificates evidencing the same shall be on file at all times in the office of the City Clerk. E. Worker's Compensation Insurance Contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect throughout the entire term of the contract, full worker's compensation insurance in accordance with provisions and requirements of Division IV, Worker's Compensation and Insurance of the Labor Code of the State of California and other applicable laws. Certificates of such insurance, approved �y the City Manager and City Attorney, shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the execution of the contract. Contractor shall immediately inform City of any cancellation, withdrawal and/or change of any such insurance. III. SCOPE OF WORK A. Standard of Performance The primary objective of recreation services is to provide a wide range of programming for all facets of the Community. B. Facility Usage The City of Diamond Bar will enter into Master Use Agreements with Walnut Unified School District and Pomona Unified School District for field usage, classrooms and multi-purpose centers. These facilities will be available to the recreational contractor. The Cities parks will also be available. C. Proarammina Services 1. Contract Classes: Fee classes shall be offered in a wide range of activities for residents. Classes could include: arts/crafts, fitness, theater, computer classes, tennis, martial arts, dog obedience, gymnastics, etc. Class instructors generally retain 60a of fees collected, with the contract provider receiving 40% of the fees. Participant fees would off -set cost of conducting the program. 2. Adult Sports Offer adult leagues in co-ed volleyball and 5 -on -5 basketball in addition offer one co-ed volleyball and one 3 -on -3 basketball tournament. The adult league will recover direct cost in addition to generating revenues. 3. Tiny Tots: Currently a tiny tot program is offered at Heritage Park. It operates Monday, Wednesday, Friday 8 a.m. to noon and Tuesday, Thursday 8 a.m. to noon. This program has covered direct costs. 4. Excursions• Adult, Youth and Family excursion should be offered throughout the year. The City of Diamond Bar has use of Proposition A funds for renting of the buses, this will assist in having fees cover administration costs. 5. Special Events: Community wide special events are held throughout the year. For example Rent -a -Santa program, Halloween Haunted House/carnival. 6. Concerts in the Park: Offer a series of concerts in the Park, minimum of four. Program can be held at Sycamore Park or Summit Ridge Park. 7. Heritage Youth/Adult Sports: At a local park there is a citizen sport council which offers youth and adult sports, there will need to be some administration/coordination of the program. The charge for this is paid by the council. 8. Park Drop-in Program: Offer supervised play (arts/crafts, games, etc.)for children of all ages at two local parks. The program would run every Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 9. Park Monitoring and Scheduling: The current recreation provider handles park monitoring (restroom closing/lights) and field scheduling (sports organizations, one time users). The City will enter into Master Use Agreements with the schools and this service will need to be provided. D. Administration of Services Please detail the needed administration of the above mentioned program. E. Proposal Contents Include in your proposal a detailed cost of the above mentioned programs and how they would be administered. Describe the type of recreational services that would be offered. Describe staffing, equipment, facilities or any other components of such a program. Information on current recreation program, brochures, budgets, joint powers agreement, City park and School sites, quarterly attendance reports and financial reports can be provided if needed. IV. BUDGET AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Budget Preparation The budget shall be prepared for the fiscal year July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992. In regards to the proposal please detail what supplies/ service will be needed prior to the July 1, 1991 starting date, and when work will need to commence to provide for a smooth transition of recreation providers. The budget process shall consist of a determination of programs/service level desired then a line item budget shall be prepared for reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the City Council. B. Claim for Payment The Recreation Servide Provider will submit monthly invoices detailing the charges in terms of services provided. Revenues will directed to the City of Diamond Bar. The City will be given the opportunity to audit the books for expenses. The budget may be increased or decreased at any time upon notice of the City to the recreation provider. V. REPORTING The recreation service provider will be responsible for submitting a written monthly report to the City as well as sending a liaison to the City Parks and Recreation Commission meetings. KF/RFP CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECREATION SERVICES Name of Provider: Please list any equipment that would be needed to provided the recreation program. EQUIPMENT• TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED: COST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECREATION SERVICES Name of Provider: Please provide detail of budget. Contract Classes: Adult Sports: Number of Classes per Quarter Projected Revenue Net Cost to Diamond Bar Number of leagues Offered Projected Revenue Net Cost to Diamond Bar Tiny Tots: (Heritage Park Program) Excursions• Special Events• Projected Revenue Net Cost to Diamond Bar Number of Excursions offered Projected Revenue Net Cost to Diamond Bar 1� Special Events Offered - 1. 2. Net Cost to Diamond Bar Heritage Youth/Adult Sports: Coordination of Program Advertising of Programs Park Drop-in Program:_ Staff Cost Services and Supplies Concerts in the Park: Number of Concerts Net Cost to Diamond Bar Park Monitoring/Scheduling: Net Cost to Diamond Bar TOTAL COST CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECREATION SERVICES EQUIPMENT: $ PERSONNEL: Number/Positions Needed ;I SERVICE/SUPPLIES: Please list needed supplies. BROCHURES/PUBLICITY: I IF MISCELLANEOUS: TOTAL PROPOSAL COST TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF BREA PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT RECREATION SERVICES FOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APRIL 4, 1991 EX fU-T.I VE SUMMARY The attached proposal from the City of Brea is to provide recreational services specified in the Request for Proposals. The scope, type and duration of the various programs and services will, on occasion, depend on joint use negotiations with walnut Valley Unified School District and the Pomona Unified School District for facility use. Programs and services to be provided will include: I. Contract Classes 2. Youth and Adult Sports programs 3. Tiny Tots 4. Youth and Adult Excursions S. Rent -A -Santa program 6. A Series of summer Concerts in the Park (5) 7. Staff support and coordination with local sports organizations for promotion of their programs and the scheduled use of athletic facilities. S. Provision of staff, as a resource, to one monthly meeting of the City's Parks and Recreation Commission as requested by Diamond Bar staff and a monthly report to the advisory body. Brea believes in quality accessible services, visibility, fiscal accountability and community involvement. We feel that adequate and well- trained staffing is essential, Therefore, our proposed staffing consists of a full-time Recreation Superintendent, and Community Services Specialist supported by a part-time Administrative Clerk and Community Services Specialist for sports programs. Attached is a copy of the proposed organizational chart identifying positions and responsibilities. Since we believe staff must be available and accessible to the Diamond Bar community, we require that office space, equipment and phone access be made available. Quality programs plus aggressive Gusto her care are essential. Included in our proposal is a program narrative on each service and itemized budget or projected expenditures and revenues, The total expenditures for the services rendered will be $283,411. The total revenue projected is $130,000. The actual "net cost" to the City of Dia;mnnd Bar will be $153,411. Diamond Bar will be invoiced 523,618 monthly in advance, based on the gross amount of the contract of $283,411. Brea will process payments to Diamond Bar, on a quarterly basis, of all actual revenues generated from program activity fees. Ire the event these revenue projections are exceeded, both agencies will split the overage. Should the program core under budget, both agencies will split the remaining contract funds. Per discussion with Diamond Aar staff, Brea will prepare a program budget for contract services to Diamond Bar as part of the regular budget process (April). Monthly expenditure and revenue reports will be made available as part of the budget management and monitoring process. Diamond Bar will receive a copy of the report as well, for monitoring,and auditing needs. Executive Summary Page Two Brea will provide a variety of established and successful support services. The support services include computerized financial managersent and reporting, purchasing, duplicating and media services for graphics, marketing assistance and video taping of activities/events, These services are included in the twenty-two per cent (22%) overhead cost of the proposal. Brea's Community Services Directur will be responsible for marnagement and supervision of the contract services. Attached to the proposal is a copy of the City's organizational chart and that of the Comrunity Services Department. The Diamond Bar program will be able to draw on the expertise of the Coma. ur.i ty Services Department full tinme Leisure Services staff which has over 30 years of full-time experience in recreation and working with the community. Attached are the resumes of the senior management staff of Brea's Community Services Department who will be overseeing the contract. Plans are to recruit for all full-time and part-tima positions t-) provide services to the City of Diamcnd Bar. These positions will, on an as needed basis, be supplemented by existing City of Brea staff, to insure %quality and adequate staffing at all tires. As part of the proposal we will implement an ongoing participant and customer care evaluation program to assess and respond to customer comments and suggestions on the seroices provided. "Customer care" feedback is a great tool for community input and involvement. Brea is a self - insured public agency. Included in the proposal packet is a copy of the City's proof of insurance coverage and adequate worker's compensation coverage. Brea looks forward to and welcomes the t;hallerge of providing recreational services to the City of Diamond Bar, TD;j4/1:exect.sum 1 4/4/9i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR R.F.P. RECREATION SERVICES BY CITY OF.-BREA ADMI.N_ISTRALM 1. Recreation Superintendent $ 45,675 2. Community Services Specialist -Contract Classes 26.960 3. Community Services Specialist -Athletics ($ip.9b15) 16,8$0 4. Administrative Clerk 1I (25 nrs @ $10.5211) 1116-L Recreation Superintendent Community Services Specialist - Contract Classes Part -tithe Medicare (1.5% of $47,654) Retirement (P.T.) (7.5% of $47,654) Ira n i ng qb .rI tU CPRS Conference (Recreation Superintendent) SCMAF Sports Institute Contract Class Supervisors Liability Insurance (55,000,000) MOKKOUT-MIX1141 i $143,162 $ 10,965 6,520 715 Benefits $ 21,775 $ 1,500 100 50 $ 1,650 $ 13,600 I. Contract Classes - City of Brea currently has 25 instructors under contract on a 60%/40% split basis who teach 60 different classes on a quarterly schedule basis serving 1,600 participants and generating $60,400 revenue annually. Contract Classes Proposal to Diamond Bar Conduct contract classes at ten different sites in Diamond Bar utilizing Walnut Valley, Pomona Unified and City park sites similar in scope to current City of Brea program. Use as many instructors currently under contract to Walnut Valley as possible, suppl emnsnt i r:g Nil th City of Brea Instructors as necessary. Annual Participant Goal 1,600 Annual Revenue Goal $60,040 1. Contractors 60% X $60,000 $ 36,000 2. Mileage Round Trip/day Brea to Diamond Bar/Class Monitoring 16 miles X 240 days X $0.255/mile 980 3. postage 350 Total Expenses $ 37,330 2. Adult Sports - City of Brea currently rains leagues for adult softball (18 teams), 5 on 5 adult basketball (22 teams), 3 on 3 basketball tourney (25 teams), and coed volleyball (40 teams) serving 950 participants and generating $23,000 revenue annually. Adult Sports Fro osal to Diamond Bar a. Adult Sof tba l- 54 teams/year (pending facility availability) b, Adult Basketball -18 teams/year (pending facility availability) e. Adult Coed Volleyball -48 teams/year (sending facility availability) Annual Participant Goal 1,506 Annual Revenue Goal ;36,480 Softbal] - Revenue 54 teams X $390/team - $21,060 Officials $ 6,156 Scorers 6,480 Field Prep 108 fields X 1 hr./field X $8/lar. - 3 864 Expenses Softball $13,500 Ault Basketball - Revenue 18 teams X $39t)/tear, - $7,420 Officials $ 4,104 Scorers _"-099 Expenses Basketball S 5,184 dul.t oed VC ' ,a L' - Revenue 46 teams X $175/team - $5,400 Officials $ 5,472 Expenses Volleyball $ 5,472 I Summary Adult Sports Total Teams 120 Total Revenue $36,480 Total Expenses $24,156 3. Tiny Tots - Conduct as currently conducted. All direct costs covered by revenue. Total Cost $11,905 Revenue 13,000 Participants 34 per session: (school year program) 4. Excursions - City of Brea currently conducts mine youth excursions during the summer, a family trip to the Rose Parade, plus three adult trips to Las Vegas/Laughlin as a 24 hoer turnarou-nd. Youth excursions attract 700 participants, Rose Parade 250, Las Vegas/LauShlin 120. Total revenue generated is $18,430. The City of Brea propose to offer this same package of excursions to Diamond Bar. Additional excursions, if so desired by Diamond Bar, may be added to this contract on a direct cost recovery basis. (it is our understanding that Proposition A funds are available to cover all bus costs associated with Diamond Bar excursions.) Rose Parade - 250 Participants 9 Youth Excursions - 2170 Participants 3 Las Vegas Turn aro,-ur,d;'taughlfin Turnarounds - 120 Participants Rose Parade - Revenue 250 participants X $46 - $11,500 Seating $29 X 250 participants $ 7+250 Buses - N/C - Prop A 320 Staffing - 5 staff X 8 hers. X $8rhr. a Coordinators X 100 hrs. X $10/hr. 11000 Continental Breakfast _...-.-. Expenses Rose Parade r 8,82; Ycuth Excursions - Revenue 270 Admissions 270 X $11 - Staff 3 X 10 hrs. X 9 trips X $8/hr.- Buses - N/C - Prop. A Expenses Youth Excursions Vegas/Laughlin - Revenue 120 X $15 . $1,800 Staff 20 hrs. X 3 X $S s Snacks 3 X $75 Buses - N/C - Prop. A Expenses `degas/Laughlin Summary Ex - Total, Par'icipants - 640 Total Revenue - $18,430 Total Expenses - $14,655 5. Special Events 1. Rent -A -Santa 5 5,130 $ 480 22 S 705 City of Brea currently crakes about 75 Santa yisits per year, Visits are normally conducted between 6 and 10 p.m., seven days a week December 7-24. Special visits on other dates and times are available on a "Santa Available" basis and are $35. Visits normally last ten minutes, eight candy canes are distributed, and Santa is driven to visits by a part-time Leader in a private vehicle. The driver is dressed as an elf and accompanies Santa into the visit site. Santa is paid 50% of revenue collected for the visit', elf as a part-time worker at an hourly rate, Milage is reimbursed at 25.5 cents per mile. Similar program is p�'opossd fog• City of Diamond Sas~ Rent -A -_Santa Cosh Revenue 75 visits 24 @ $35 = $ 844 51 @ $25 - _..x,27 $ 2,115 Staffing Coordinator 50 pars. ^ S10/hr. = $ 500 Leaders 50 hrs. X $8/hr. - 400 Contract Santa 50% of revenue - 11060 Milea3e 100 ;,rdles 3 25.5 cants/Mile n 25 Candy Ganes 720 i5.67 cents each - __M Total Expenses , 2,106 Total Ccst: S 21106 Total Revenue: $ 2,115 Total Visits: 75 3. Concerts in the Park The City or Brea currently offers rine concerts eats, s;,uer on a weekly basis, serving about 500 p?ople per tor4ert. A similar program could be offered in the City of Diammond Sar. Staffing: Coordinator 75 hr's. X $10/hr. S 7S0 (Includes site supervision) Operating Services: Sands $500/wk. X 5 weeks - 2,500 Promotional Materialsi Total Expenses $ 4,254 1 li ... Y 1 _ • ' J The City of Brea currently provides staff support and coordination with local organizations for the orderly prorr!otion oi' their programs and the scheduled use and maintenance of athletic facilities on City, school and County park sites, We would provide this same service to the City of Diamond Sar. Meetings with sports groups would be held quarterly. This will require 250 of the Recreation Superintendent's time. Cost of this is included ;ander administration in the Recreation Super intandent's salary. We recommend that park moritoring be handled in-house by Diamond Bar City part-tima staff reporting to the City Maintenance Department. RECREATION SERVICES PROGRAM REVISED PROPOSAL Persyn_n�l_ Recreation Superintendent $ 45,675 Community Services Specialist 11 -Contract (4Ohr) 26,960 Com, unity Services Specialist I -Athletics (25hr) ($12.9515) 16,854 Administrative Clerk II (25hr 9 $10.5211) .3 $103,162 19 nefi Recreation Superintendent $ 10,965 61520 Community Services Specialist I - Contract Sub -Total 0 Community Services Special st I - Athletics --13300 0 Administrative Clerk I Revenue 775 Part -Time Medicare (@.i115) $153,411 Part -Time PERS (@.O75) ----�-�� $ 21,775 Trai^i^i_ %� �"5h'►�S $ 1,650 ntrdct Cla ses $ 37,330 Tiny 12ts $ 11,945 ,ii .Events Excursions S 14,655 Concerts in Park (5) 4,254 Rent -A -Santa $ 2,11" 21,015 Sub -Total $220,993 Administrati Sub -Total $269,611 LiLi ab fl_jjy Insurance --13300 Tota �?�.4.11 Revenue $130,000 Net Cost $153,411 &W: 12 monthly payrents s 23,618 The City of Diamiond Bar will ptarthase recreational .tuppl les and equipment. Estimated cost: $13,450. Estimated revenues: $130,+000. Estimated facilities rental casts: $30,000. BR:em.diabar-c.3 4/4/91 EQUIPMENT DIAMOND BAR WILL PROVIDE MU Balls $1,157 Bases 750 Chalk/Chalker 648 Balls 100 First Aid 2S VOLLEYBALL Balls 120 Nets iso CERTS IMEPA��4 Sound Syste,mi 900 Sub -Total: $3,850 2 Santa Suits with Beard Ssts 51450 2 Elf Suits 150 AST 385 Ccmputer 1850 Printer 1300 Recreation Ragistrat1c;i Software 4500 Reconditioned IBS! Selectric IT. Typewriter 350 Sub -Total: 1$9,600 GRAND TOTAL; 1 $13,450 BR:em.diabar-d.3 4/4/51 City of Diamond Bar Recreation Services R.F.P. by City of Brea PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART ONAdm!ns'.rative , C1erK 11 Community Services . Specialist Sports Program Field - Preparation Personnel Recreation Superintendent CCii6t*' unity, Services Specialist Contract Class Marketing! Tny Tots Exoursion&, Special Everts ` Coordinator. tk- s«- ►DENOTES PAr�T•T':�riE Contract Classes $ 60,000 Adult Sports 36,490 Softball $21,060 Basketball $ 7,020 Volleyball S 9,400 Tiny Tots 13,000 Excursions 18,430 Rose Parade $11,500 Youth Excursions $ 5,130 Vegds/Laughl in S 1,800 Special Events 21115 Rent -A -Santa $ 2,115 TOTAL REVENUE $130,025 BR:em.rfp-a.3 4/4/91 (Revised) Overheats is estimated at 22,X of total costs. Overhead includes: Office Space and Sup;.lies Telephones and Other Utilities Purchasing Division Support Finance Department Support Computer Support/Service Media Services Department Support Duplication and Printing Postage City Vehicle Use Personnel Department Support Workers Compensation (Part -Time Staff) Support. from Community Services Department Management Staff BR:em.rfp-a,3 4/4/91 (Revised) E_� Community Events: Rent -A -Santa (Dec. 24) $35/visit (Dec, 7-23) $25/visit (special visits - other than normal dates and times) $35/visit Santa Contract -50% of revenue callected Contract Classes: Instructor Fee - 60% of revenue collected Adult Sports: Adult Softball $390/12 games Adult Coed Volleyball $175/12 matches Adult Full Court Basketball $350/12 games Tiny Tots: $1.60 per hour Excursions: Rose Farade $45 per participant Youth Excursions $19 per participant Disneyland Youth Excursion $gt per participant Las Vegas/Laughlin Turnarosn, $16 per participant Administration: Refund Service Charge $ 5 Returned Check Service Charge $10 Credit Card Use Service Charge 71% Registration Fee $ 1/:lass (contract classes only) Pion -Resident Fee 1 S 5 BR:em.rfp-a.3 4/4/91 (Revised) GENERAL INFORMT10H City of Brea Number One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92621 (714) 990-7600 Incorporated: 1917 Population: 33,000 Humber of wrnpl oyeez : :350 Ful 1 ti ±a-, 50 Fart- wi„+e Existing Joint Dar and M-ainte�nance of Fa•cii?t.ies Agrae-',ants 1. Brea Olinda anified Scholl' D=strict Number One Civic Leotcr- Cir°cl� Brea, California 92621 714) 990-7800 2. Orange County Environrental Management Ag-smcy - 10852 Douglas Road Anaheim, California 92605 (714) 5067-6200 (Joint Use Agreement for Ted Craig Regional Park athletic fialds J4/L:ger;info.ct.y 4/4/91 EXHIBIT "C" Mid-range hourly rates for City of Braa Community Servive3 Departmelt positior. classifications as of 4/4/91. Posit ion EQ:iL.Skx Community Services Director $40.3442 Community Services Manager $26.6612 Recreation Superintendent $24.7031 Administrative Assistant I1 $19.8530 Recreation Supervisor $17.5821 Administrative Assistant I $17,0121 Community Services Specialist ii 3:4.6:81 Administrative Secretary $14.1091 COMMunity Services Specialist 1 $12.9515 Administrative Clerk II $10.52141 Community Services Coordinator $10.01 Administrative Clerk I $9,5538 Administrative Intern $9.10 Senior Lifeguard/Instructor $8.39 Senior Community Services Leader $7.81 Lifeguard/Instructor $7.31 Corr,nwnity Services Leader $6.71 Lifeguard $6.28 Community Services Worker $5.70 AGENDA NO. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT ---- -- —--------- ------ — DATE: April 12, 1991 MEETING DATE: April 16, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Sid Jalal Mousavi, City Engineer/Public orks Director SUBJECT: EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION "A" FUNDS BACKGROUND: On March 19, 1991, the City Council authorized the exchange of $500,000 of the City's uncommitted Proposition "A" Funds with the City of Commerce's General Fund monies. The proposed exchange rate was $.060 in General Fund for $1.00 in Proposition "A" Funds. DISCUSSION• The exchange with the City of Commerce did not take place as anticipated. However staff has been able to negotiate the exchange of $600,000 of the City of Diamond Bar's Proposition "A" Funds in return for the City of Santa Clarita General Fund monies. The negotiated rate is $0.65 in General Fund for $1.00 in Proposition "A" Funds. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the City Manager to execute necessary document in order to exchange $600,000 of the City's Proposition "A" Funds for $390,000 of General Fund monies. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence Belanger City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION A (LOCAL RETURN TRANSIT FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA GENERAL FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar wishes to transfer $600,00 of its uncommitted Proposition A Local Return transit funds to the City of Santa Clarita for use in regional ridesharing; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita offered to transfer $390,000 of their General Funds to the City of Diamond Bar; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar has determined that the transit needs of the City can be adequately met if this fund trade is approved; and WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar plans to expend these funds to augment the City's capabilities in meeting the general public's needs and other City expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The transfer of $600,000 of Proposition A Local Return Funds in exchange for the transfer of $390,000 of General Funds is authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute, on behalf of the City, any required documents to effectuate this exchange of funds. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and send certified copies to the City of Santa Clarita. MAYOR I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of , 1991, by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS - LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 30 04, of Santa Clar(ta HA� P ;44 1 - SL2ET li E P, i MI F By - y.9 Nc 04/12/91 11:31 CIT'/ HALL Z 002 1 18051259-8125 1 City of Santa Clarita April 2,=91 Mr. 2--bert L. ':all Nort, City manager r_'7 Y 01' DIAMOND BAR i East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Bar, CA 91765-4.177 1r irtt�i.t t� 1)rin6 to o -,n i:'.ty Councii for ec s'dnration in . a:eetint of April 23, 19 1 rhe exchange of $'93,000 of this City's—General ;rl ds in exchar.ge for $600,000 of your Prci•osi::ia.i d fu-Lding. it =s ovr understanding that yo' -:r Cc-uncil wi:i consider .he exchange on April, 16, 1951. Upon action_ by ovr respective Covr_ciis, xe wi11 then present the ex'-l<ar_g= t,, *C 'fl,.';c _'Cr heir app"Cval. ;+e ap icc:ate the oppori_'.:nity t'? participate In this exzha-age of funding ,and look for -ward to any epportun'_ties of a siitAlar exr-hang_c _., the future. S.nc 1el,3 ill")gle A. Carava:hd " ! City Manager GA1C:jem:gmm-1183 cc: ?r?u. Med':-_:A, __-+r_rcr (.: FL' _;c ,d.,rks Proposition A Exchange Dear Mr. Van Dort: ray �;•.,,- :,; As d sussed in o1jr telephone conversation yesterday, the City of ;a.,ta Clarita is interested in the exchange of Proposition A fu :di^.r at a rate of 65� of our General Fend money for $1.00 of you Prcposit�ion A ivnds. The opportunity to mu.ually benefit _>incerel app.re� .ate/. :1r.'3e:stand —,g that y.•i:r rirect;or F1";ic: kcrks Mr. -'t1;av#, h3s 1. 1! at Eu t: our '_',ire;:tijr of Public works, - - - Joh" Meiir_a, tha-_ ar, exchange of i6ua,nbo rather Chan $500,000 ±� no o_`_`ered tre City o. Santa Clarita and our olrecco: rg-:ess to Enter '_t:to such an exchan&e. 1r irtt�i.t t� 1)rin6 to o -,n i:'.ty Councii for ec s'dnration in . a:eetint of April 23, 19 1 rhe exchange of $'93,000 of this City's—General ;rl ds in exchar.ge for $600,000 of your Prci•osi::ia.i d fu-Lding. it =s ovr understanding that yo' -:r Cc-uncil wi:i consider .he exchange on April, 16, 1951. Upon action_ by ovr respective Covr_ciis, xe wi11 then present the ex'-l<ar_g= t,, *C 'fl,.';c _'Cr heir app"Cval. ;+e ap icc:ate the oppori_'.:nity t'? participate In this exzha-age of funding ,and look for -ward to any epportun'_ties of a siitAlar exr-hang_c _., the future. S.nc 1el,3 ill")gle A. Carava:hd " ! City Manager GA1C:jem:gmm-1183 cc: ?r?u. Med':-_:A, __-+r_rcr (.: FL' _;c ,d.,rks AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 ORAL PRESENTATION BY GENERAL MANAGER, ED BIEDERMAN V NATIONAL SCHOOL SAFETY CENTER W 16830 Ventura13MI , Su le 200 Encino, Calllomla 91436 818137'7- 6200 March 12, 1991 Mr. Eugene T. Domeno Principal Neil Armstrong Elementary School 22750 Beaverhead Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Mr. Domeno: The National School Safety Center is pleased to inform you that you have been selected as one of the 1991 "Principals of Leadership." This annual program recognizes ten outstanding principals nationwide who, through their effective leadership, promote safe and productive school campuses. As principal of Neil Armstrong Elementary School, you and the other recipients will be recognized through a variety of media activities. This includes a print media public service advertising campaign, a news release to all major media outlets in the country and feature articles in School Safety, the nation's leading school crime prevention newsjournal. "Principals of Leadership" is co-sponsored by the National school Safety Center, National Association of Elementary School Principals and National Association of Secondary School Principals. More details about the program, and copies of the complete 1991 presentation packet, will be forwarded to you shortly. If you have not done so already, please send us your photograph for the print advertisement. It is critical that this photograph meets the following standards: black and white, approximately 5x7 inches, close-up, sharply focused, and delivered to NSSC by April 13. Please contact Ms. June Lane if you need assistance arranging for this photograph. Also, please forward names and addresses of any specific officials or media representatives you would like notified of your selection. Congratulations and keep up the great work! Cordially, RONALD D. STEPHENS Executive Director A PARTNERSHIP OF PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY AND THE UNITED SPATES DL,AIITML'NTS OF JUSTICE AND EDUCATION 1990 PRINCIPALS4LEADERSHIP LAST YEAR TM Leadership is an intriguing quality. In some people, the ability to lead is almost second nature, while others gain such skills through years of experience. One thing is certain, whether in business, government, ath- letics or education: leaders do rise to the top, usually bringing their teams or institutions along with them. "Principals of Leadership" recognizes the outstanding men and women in our nation's schools who, through their effective leadership, promote safer, more productive and more positive learning climates on the campuses they administer. Vision, persuasiveness and commitment to excellence are common threads in the profiles of the 10 principals honored this year. Each displays the ability to work toward tomorrow's dreams instead of putting out yesterday's "fires"; to earn others' respect and trust; and to dedicate their efforts to providing all students with the best possible educational opportunities. Since sate, quality schooling requires student, staff and com- munity involvement, these principals' special programs and talents take on varied emphases. For example, programs that integrate school activities with local businesses to provide job training and student scholarships help reduce dropout rates. Staff and student recognition programs boost morale and reduce discipline problems. Special campus cleanup projects instill a "pride of ownership" among students for their cam- puses and reduce vandalism. And law-related curricula teach students about their rights and responsibilities as citizens. These 10 education leaders and their achievements are positive examples for all leaders of children and adults alike. The 1990 "Principals of Leadership" are (counterclockwise from top left): Lea Ellen Albert, Kahuku High and Intermediate School, Kahuku, Hawaii; Vicki L. Baker, North Kansas City High School, North Kansas City, Missouri; Ron Burks, Cam- denton Junior High School, Camdenton, Missouri, Sandra D. Johnson, Mt. Carmel High School, San Diego, California; Gloria J. Jones, John G. Osborne Elementary School, Houston, Texas; Malcolm G. Largmann, Townsend Harris High School at Queens College, Flushing, New York; Wes V. Lauterbach, Southeast High School, Lincoln, Nebraska; Richard A. Marquez, Sunset High School, Dallas, Texas; Thomas P. O'Neill, Jr., Solomon Lewenberg Middle School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Richard R. Schiller, Norman High School, Norman, Oklahoma. For more insight from the "Principals of Leadership," write: National School Safety Center, Pepperdrne University, Malibu, California 90263. Presented as a public service by the National Association of Elementary School Principals, the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the NATIONAL SCHOOL" SAFETY CENTER V NEWS RELEASE SCHOOL LEADERS HONORED Ten school administrators have been recognized as 199)'s Principals of Leadership based on their ability to motivate their staffs; encourage their students; and involve parents, business and the community in their schools' educational goals. The Principals of Leadership special recognition program, now in its sixth year, is sponsored by the National School Safety Center, the National Association of Elementary School Principals and the National Association of Secondary School Principals, in cooperation with the U. S.Department of Education. The program honors some of the nation's best school leaders, men and women who guide their students and their schools into success. The 10 honored principals head elementary, middle and high schools from around the country. Approximately 100 candidates were selected from a field that consisted of principals recognized by the U. S. Department of Education's 1989/90 Exemplary School Recognition Program, recommendations from NASSP and NAESP staff, and referrals from NSSC personnel based on site visits and national resource reviews. The candidates were then rated in three categories: character development, school climate and school/community relations. Dr. Timothy J. Dyer, executive director of the co -sponsoring NASSP, commented, "There is no more important enterprise to our nation than excellent schools. And the key player in making schools as strong as they can be is an outstanding principal." "Educational quality begins at the top," says Dr. Ronald D. Stephens, executive Director of the National School Safety Center. "The principal sets the stage for productivity and the educational success of each student." Each of the honored principals set high standards for both staff and students, encouraged community participation, and established school/business partnerships that enhanced the schools' educational package. The National School Safety Center, NASSP, NAESP and the U. S. Department of Education invite you to join in saluting these outstanding leaders. AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS: 271 South Brea Canyon Road P O Box 508 Edward N. Layton Walnut California 91789-3002 • 17141 i'i: 7554 (818) 964-655, President FAX 17141 594 Li53 ' Election Division Ill Diamond Bar, California 91 765 William G. Wentworth Vice President Dear Bob: Election Division Enclosed is a sample proclamation in support of Water John E. Fisher Awareness Month, May 1991, which we would appreciate Vice President March 26, 1991 Election Division IV If the City responds favorably to this request, please Richard C. Engdahl notify us of the date and time of the meeting at which Assistant Treasurer they will take action so that a representative of our Election Division II District can be present to accept the proclamation. Keith K. Gunn We are sincerely grateful for the ongoing support we Director receive from the City of Diamond Bar, and thank you in Election Division V advance for your cooperation once again. STAFF: Mr. Robert Van Nort, City Manager Edmund M. Biederman City of Diamond Bar General Manager Secretary 21 660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 Norman R. Miyake Diamond Bar, California 91 765 Treasurer LEGAL COUNSEL: Dear Bob: H. Jess Seneca) Enclosed is a sample proclamation in support of Water Awareness Month, May 1991, which we would appreciate you submitting to your City Council for endorsement. If the City responds favorably to this request, please notify us of the date and time of the meeting at which they will take action so that a representative of our District can be present to accept the proclamation. We are sincerely grateful for the ongoing support we receive from the City of Diamond Bar, and thank you in advance for your cooperation once again. Very truly yours, WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT KAREN POWERS Assistant to the General Manager KP:ja Enclosure S A M P L E WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, water is California's most precious natural resource; and WHEREAS, the state has experienced four consecutive critically dry years; and WHEREAS, the drought has demonstrated the significance of water to the health and welfare of all our communities; and WHEREAS, to ensure an ample supply of good quality water for our residents, we must work together to effectively conserve and protect the local water resource; and WHEREAS, during the month of May the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR joins with the WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT to work to increase understanding of water; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR does hereby proclaim May 1991 as Water Awareness Month and urges all citizens to join with them in supporting the WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT in their efforts to help Californians be water aware. The dates for the Week this year are May 6 through 12. By scheduling special activities and issuing proclamations and letters, Diamond Bar will be joining an increasing number of governmental jurisdictions nationwide which are supporting the Week and its objectives. Enclosed is a 1991 manual on how to celebrate the Week, which indicates that 350 cities across the nation participated in 1990. We hope that Diamond Bar will participate in the celebration this year. Enclosed is a copy of the 1990 proclamation issued by Governor Duekmejian, and we have already contacted Governor Pete Wilson regarding a 1991 proclamation. We are enthusiastic about preparations for this year's observance, and are available to confer with your staff as they develop your plans. Sincerely, 'Evelyn NJ. Gutierrez, oPes+derai� PER - Los Angeles Region EMG:RIH CITYLTR.PF Enclosures "Promoting Pride in Public Service" off 1.0 Public Employees Roundtable • f 500 W. Temple Street, Room 375, Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 t ... I National Headquarters r: February 8, 1991 Post Office Box 6164 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D C 20044 Joan Keston Executive Director i1 Gary H. Werner (202) 535-4324 The Mayor of the City of Diamond Bar Los Angeles Office 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite No. 100 500Temple Street Room 375 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Los Angeles, Calif 90012 Evelyn Gutierrez Dear Mayor Werner: President ( 21 3)974-1755 Richard Hoye This is an invitation for the City of Diamond Bar to participate in observance 213) 9 .1766 of Public Service Recognition Week 1991. The objectives of the Week are to say thank you to public employees for their dedicated service and to Fedeberalrship State, and inform American citizens about the range and quality of vital services which Local P Professional andail public employees provide. and Employee Organizations The dates for the Week this year are May 6 through 12. By scheduling special activities and issuing proclamations and letters, Diamond Bar will be joining an increasing number of governmental jurisdictions nationwide which are supporting the Week and its objectives. Enclosed is a 1991 manual on how to celebrate the Week, which indicates that 350 cities across the nation participated in 1990. We hope that Diamond Bar will participate in the celebration this year. Enclosed is a copy of the 1990 proclamation issued by Governor Duekmejian, and we have already contacted Governor Pete Wilson regarding a 1991 proclamation. We are enthusiastic about preparations for this year's observance, and are available to confer with your staff as they develop your plans. Sincerely, 'Evelyn NJ. Gutierrez, oPes+derai� PER - Los Angeles Region EMG:RIH CITYLTR.PF Enclosures "Promoting Pride in Public Service" EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA A PROCLAMATION by the Governor of the State of California WHEREAS, employees of federal. state. and local government and educational institutions have long been noted for their professionalism, commitment to excellence and high standards of service and achievement; and WHEREAS. acting in their many diverse capacities, public emplovees make sigaifi- j cant contributions to the growth and prosperity of our society and the continued progress of our economy; and WHEREAS. always recognized for their responsiveness and dedication to meeting the needs of the public. these individuals truly reflect the finest traditions of public service and their efforts are fundamental to ensuring that the cherished ideals of our P democratic society will remain strong and vibrant; and WEIRRAS. public service is one of our nation's highest and most demanding call- ings. requiring a devotion and strong work ethic which provides talented and committed individuals with an opportunity for a satisfying, enjoyable professional career; and WHEREAS, in a recent report prepared by the National Commission on the Public "Leadership it Service entitled. for America; Rebuilding the Public Service." was suggested that there is a growing need for a strong public service system based on leadership. talent and performance; and �p WHEREAS. a National Campaign for Public Service has been initiated by the American Society for Public Administration and the Public Employees' Roundtable to �s help all citizens better realize the rewards and fulfillment which come from a career in public service; and 71MCKE15, the activities sponsored during this campaign will culminate with a "Celebration of Excellence in the Public Service" in May 1990 to help foster a more positive image of the public service; NOW. 'ITEEElOHE. do I. GEORGE DEMCNJIM. Governor of the State of California, hereby proclaim May 7-13, 1990 as Public Service Recognition Week in California, and urge all citizens to participate in appropriate observances in honor of those individ- uals who have dedicated themselves to making our state and nation better place for all Citizens. ` IP WITNESS WHERlAF I have hereunto net my band rrpr State and caused the Great Seal of the of 6 � n�. � California to be affixed this 11th day of '`,4 April 1990. 11 G V r Governor ofCaliforai tr "w z ATTESl': i -'+ Secretary of State AGENDA NO. -------------------------- -------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE: April 10, 1991 MEETING DATE: April 16, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager SUBJECT: "PARTICIPATING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT" PROGRAM DISCUSSION The Institute for Local Self Government and the League of California Cities are sponsoring an Institute For Teachers to be held in Sacramento, August 12- 16. Consider this: Public officials at one level of government are blamed for policies enacted by others. City complaints are often directed to the wrong department. Many city residents cannot identify any of their locally elected officials. According to a survey by the Institute for Local Self Government, a majority of California teachers spend little or no time on local govern- ment. Teacher training focuses on national, rather than state and local government. Local elections have lower turnouts than state and national elections. To address this problem, the League, through the Institute for Local Self Government, has undertaken a new program, titled, "Participating In Local Government." The aim of the program is to help prepare students to become informed, responsible, and involved citizens by providing teachers with materials and strategies for instilling a greater understanding of the foundations and practice of local government in California's future voters. RECOMMENDATION• Approve participation in program, "Participating In Local Government." FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $2,000.00 Budgeted Amount $N/A In Account Number: N/A Deficit: $ N/A Revenue Source: General Fund R WE B ---------------------- ---------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belange City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager ILSG TO X3911.1 INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT /�►�� G r �.r!, Participating In Local Government A resource project for teachers and students to provide an understanding of local self governance March 27, 1991 City Managers, and City Clerks in Non Manager Cities Clark Goecker, Executive Director A key component of the League's C.I.T.Y. Program, (Careers, Internships and Training for You) focuses on teaching young people about local government. As the 501 (c) (3) non-profit research arm of the League, the Institute for Local Self Government has been engaged in an effort to develop curriculum materials appropriate to elementary, middle and secondary grade -levels. Funding for the curriculum development has been provided by the California Department for Education and the Joseph Drown Foundation. We are enclosing a reprint of a Western City article describing 'Participating in Local Government." Our first Institute for Teachers will be held in Sacramento August 12-16, 1991. Teachers attending this institute will then conduct in-service training workshops in their respective districts using the curriculum material developed by the ILSG. We are enclosing an announcement of the summer institute in the hope that you will bring it to the attention of your Superintendent of Schools and/or teachers you believe interested in attending the summer session. We are looking to the local community to sponsor teachers attending of the week long institute. The cost is $610 not including transportation. Contributions to the ILSG are tax-deductible. We hope you will agree this is an important step in developing an informed, civic - minded community. We urge you to encourage teachers to apply to attend the institute before the April 30 deadline, and ask that you advise the ILSG if your city and/or business community can sponsor a teacher to attend the Summer Institute. We look forward to hearing from you. 1: \m a mbcr\adms\sandy\su mi nst In cooperation with the League of California Cities, The Junior Statesmen Foundation and the Citizenship and Law -Related Education Center 1400 K Street. Suite 400. Sacramento, CA 95814. 916-444-5790 A resource project for teachers and students to provide an understanding of'local self$overnance onsider this: Public officials at one level of government are blamed for policies enact- ed nacted by others ... City complaints are often directed to the wrong department... Many city resi- dents cannot identify any of their locally elected officials... Muni- cipal elections often have voter turnout rates that are half those of state and national elections despite the fact that one vote in a mayoral race has far more im- pact than a single vote in a state or national contest... California ranks 34th nationally in voter registration. The Golden State ranks 37th in voter turnout... Approximately two-thirds of young people eligible to vote fail to do so. And, all too often, citizens are awakened from their apathy and impelled to vote only when an issue directly affects them, often enacting public policy in an atmosphere of emotion and ani- mosity rather than decision based on meaningful debate. Given the current low level of commitment to exercising the right to vote, it is not too surprising to learn that information on local government occupies only three percent of the total material presented on American government in California high school gov- ernment textbooks, according to a recent review by the Institute for Local Self Government (ILSG), the non-profit The President of the Las Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, Ray Remy is the formerDeputy Mayer of the City of Los Angeles and President ofthe Board of Directors of The Institute for Local Self Government. by Ray Remy "MUNICIPAL INNSSTrrUTIONS, CONSTITUTE T"HPS7RENGTH OF FREE NATIONS. A NATION MAY ESTABLISH, A SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT 13UT WITHOUT MUNICIPAL INSTITUTIONS IT CANNOT HAVE,THE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY." - ALEXIS DE TOCWUEVILLE research organization of the League of California Cities. Nor, given today's level of voter apathy, is it really shocking to learn that the majority of teachers responding to a survey conducted by the ILSG report they spend little or no time on local govern- ment in the classroom. Yet, local government serves a unique purpose in the American democratic sys- tem. As a "laboratory" for participation in a WESTERN CITY, APRIL 1991 representative democracy, local government contributes stability and an essential training ground for the practice of self -governance at the state and national levels. Local government also distinguishes our democracy from all others through its inde- pendence, its variety of forms, its sheer nunr bers, through the lack of hierarchy found in other levels of government, and by the extent of agreement on basic values among citizens required to make community decisions. As the level of government closest to the people, local government offers its citizens the best opportunity to be heard and to influ- ence the course of our communities. But self- governance elfgovernance is inherently dependent on the awareness of citizens and the level of com- mitment they have to participating in govern- ment_ But, today, as democratic govern- ments are forming in the rubble of total- itarianism in Eastern Europe... today, in our third century as a nation, both awareness and commitment to local self -governance seem increasingly on the wane. LTo address this problem, the League, through the Institute for Local Self Govern- ment, has undertaken a new program, titled "Participating In Local Government". The aim of the program is to help prepare students to become informed, responsible and involved citizens by providing teachers with materials and strategies for instilling a greater understanding of the foundations and practice of local government in Cal- ifornia's future voters'The premise is that, although local govefnment offers the best laboratory for civic education and partici- pation, it is a neglected area of the school curriculum "Participating In Local Government" is one component of the League's ambitious C.I.T.Y. (Careers, Internships, and Training for You) Program, founded in 1989, to create a structure to enable cities to compete for and retain the best qualified graduates from our universities and colleges; to encourage the creation and funding of programs to pro. Continued 15 Participating In Local Government, Continued vide paid internships in local government; and to increase and improve instruction about local government in our schools. Fwidod by grants from the California 1)epartmeut of Education and the Joseph Drown Foundation,The Institute for Local Solf Govc•rnlneni. is working with The Junior SlAesmen Foundation and the Sacramento Citizenship and Law -Related Education Center to develop materials, teaching t _cllniques, student activities and resources needed to fill the current void. "Participating In Local Government" includes the following key elements: — Development of a primer on California local government for teachers. -- Development of a three-week curricu- lum and activijes focusing on local govern- ment which may be adapted by the teacher in t?he classrooIn- --1 repai ation of teacher resource pack- ets for each of the clemc ntary, middle and k:C4n(ia: Ygradc levels. -- And cc;npilatio:h of suggested activi- ties, resources and a glossary. Ll addition, a week-long institute for teachers wiil be held August 12-16,1991, in tiiera;ucivc+. "Phis "Lcacherof teachers" in - FR li10PRTIIG W IRCRIR THE BENEFITS 9 STUDENTS DEVELOP THE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE. NEEDED TO MAKE REA- SONED JUDGMENTS AND BECOMEAC- TIVi, RESPONSIBLE CITIZENS. 11 EDUCATORS RECEIVE A PRACTICAL MCDEL FOR REFORMING CIVIC EDU- CATION. 0 BUSINESS GAINS A BETTER EDUCAT- ED WORKFORCE WHICH IS MORE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC AF- FAIRS AND MAKE TANGIBLE CONTRI- BUTTONS TO THE COMMUNITY. PUBLIC POLICY AT THE LOCAL LEVEL BENEFITS FROIA A MORE AC- TIVE AND INFORMED ELECTORATE. N SOCIETY GAINS A MORE WELL- INFORMED, RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN- RY OF TODAY AND TOMORROW. Ili How YOU CAN SUPPORT "PARTICIPATING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT" 9 AMONG THE REST RESOURCES FOR ANY EFFORT TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL PRO- GRAMMING ARE THE TEACHrcRS AT ALL GRACE LEVELS WHOALRaADY AI;3 rAAKING A SPECIAL EFFORT TO TEACH YOUNG PEOPLE ABOUT THE COMMUN,IT•IF�b THEY LIVE IN, GOOD CITIZENSHIP AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. H;cL8' THE ?LSG cv- VELOP A ROSTER OF THESE TEACHERS BY IDENTIFYING ERUCATOR,S !1J YCUR CWN COMMUNITY WHO ARE COMMITTED TO HELPING YOUNGSTERS UNOLRli rAE,.D '_OCAL GOVERNMENT. ' COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MEMBERS CF BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS WHO ARE CUHREN'r OR FORMER TEACHERS OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ALSO ARE AN UAPOR'TANT ; --- SOURCE FOR THIS EFFORT, SINCETHEY ARE INTIMATELY KN&e1L=_x3SA9LS,�-CU- FC1+-H EDUCATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. W YOU OR SOMECNE _L:•F J,': 7.?'Ix� ccl' .ldCiL OR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FILL. BOTH OF THES_ RO=, CT•dT.-i': 7t^,_ :'_ _ -. ■ MAKE SURE TEACHERS IN YOUR OWN CO-•MLINITY ARE INFOA.Y.Lzi.: "sCU� T4i� SUMMER TEACHERS INST:TUTS, i�LIGUST 12-15, '5991, 114 '•,-....te as;^,y TO. APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROGRAM MAYBE OSTAINPO eY C."S'r,;CTlT•!' i"�, _ ?L.SG. i♦ SPONSOR A LOCAL TEACHER. (OR SEEK BY B4tyI4w35 O.'i CL�;YiMUiJ TTY GROUPS) TO ATTEND THE SUMMER TEACHER INSTITUTE. (SP ONSORYHE? itl , °,1."a^ tiS O, WHICH INCLUDES ROOM AND BOARD ANDA $400 ST;PEND FCR CON DUCTING IN -SFR - VICE TRAINING WORKSHOPS,) ■ AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, THE ILSG WILL BE DEVELOPING A M('DEL FOR COMir1U - NIrY WORKSHOPS TO GENERATE COMMUNITY SUPpoR-r AND ti: C'..t3.Sg- ROOM INSTRUCTION ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT. TAKE THE LWQ5 I`3 .":.ANN,` NG;i- SHOP FOR CITY, SCHOOL AND BUSINESS LEADERS IN YC'W? AREA W T" T}1_ HrLP THE INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THEILSG IS A SOI (C)(3) NON -PROF(: ORGANIZATION AFFiL1ATED WITH TI;E LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. ESTABLISH_? IN 195.5 AS A NON-PARTISAN, NOM-PRC,r!T TAX- EXEMPT ORGANIZATION, THE 1; -:SG HAS ENGAGED IN RESEARCH AND FOR PROMOTING AND STRENGTHENING LCtAL SELF-SOVERNMEN•r. INCUIRICS ..<rGAi"<DITRG THIS AND OTHER PROJECTS OF THE INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF GOVEPNMENi MAY BE DIRECTED TO ILSG, 1400 K STREET, SUITE 4400, SACRANI=_A'?O, CA 9331,A; TELE- PHONE (91 B) 444-5790. stitute will gain teachers on the principles that underlie our representative form of gov- ernment overnment and review curriculum and teach- ing strategies for the classroom appropriate at each of the three grade levels. These teachers will then provide in-service training to their peers during district and county in- service training programs where partici- pants will receive resource materials for en- gaging students in discussion of local government organization and practice, citi- zenship education and community values. A third element of the project involves developing a model for community work. shops which generate community support and involvement in classroom instruction on local government. The aim of such workshops will be to encourage educators, local government officials and community LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES leaders to work together to implement local government education in their schools and to provide the support to teachers that is necessary for this to happen. A primary goal of "Participating In Local Government" is to assist teachers at all grade levels in developing a foundation in our youth for good citizenship --- for in informed citizenry with a lifelong connnit- ment to participation. Funding is currently being identified to prepare a student booklet on Calirornia local government appropriate to different grade levels as well as to providing pre -service training in local government for those study- ing to become teachers in California. Civic education is the key to nurturing our youth — the voters of tomorrow. a April 4, 1991 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE • SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 714-860-2489 • FAX 714-861-3117 Terry Blank Senior Transportation Planner DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRANCH DISTRICT F 120 S. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Mr. Blank: Prior to the installation of the two mobile homes on the Route 60 Park -N -Ride lot at Diamond Bar Boulevard for surveillance and security purposes, there was discussion of the need for a six month trial period to evaluate program effectiveness and community acceptance. Based upon our observations and comments we have received, such an update appears timely. If the program has been deemed successful by CalTrans and is intended to be continued, then we would suggest certain improvements so that the facility is better integrated into the community. Before we discuss improvements, however, it would be important to know if the program merits continuation. In other words, have thefts and vandalism been reduced, and if so, is it reasonable to !attribute such reduction to the presence of mobile homes'on the site? Assuming the program results thus far are encouraging, then we would suggest consideration of the following issues: 1. Although CalTrans has consciously opted for a low profile program which doesn't draw attention to the problems of theft and vandalism, the program also doesn't draw attention to the fact that the mobile home represents a positive effort to maintain security. While we can't speak to the validity of CalTrans' low profile strategy, there has been conjecture GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN DONALD C. NARDELLA JAY C. KIM ROBERT L.VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER Department of Transportation April 4, 1991 Page two by residents within the community that "squatters" have taken up illegal residence on these lots. Signage indicating that this is a CalTrans-sanctioned function would alleviate some of the myth surrounding the mobile homes, while providing commuters with a greater sense of security. 2. While efforts at landscaping by the individual mobile homeowner may suit their own needs, it does not create a gracious vista from the sur- rounding area (and contributes to the "squatter" theory). It would seem more suitable if CalTrans, in conjunction with the mobile home owners, were to develop a landscape plan which was designed to be viewed from the public areas as well. Obviously, it is in everyone's best interest to find ways to make the Park -N -Ride lots more secure so that they will be utilized to their full potential. By now, CalTrans should have a better idea of which, if any, of the experi- ments being conducted aroung the State to secure Park -N - Ride facilities hold the most promise. We would welcome your thoughts on these issues and are prepared to meet to discuss the matter further, if appropriate. Sincerely, - bert L. Van Nort City Manager RLVN:IMK:nbw HN71 BY & RIDESHnR:NC- STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PETE WILSON Goyrrnor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST, p LOS ANGE:ES, CA 90012 700 (213) 420-3350 (213) 620-9393 April 9, 1991 Mr. Robert L. Van Nort City ;tanager City of Diamond Bar 21560 East Copley Drive Suite 3.00 Diamond Aar, CA 91765-4177 Dear Mr. t'ar, :port.: Fegardix:g ,your letter of Aril 4, we feel that tYie mobile hoze installation at the Diam:nd Bar Park aa.d Ride has been effective= in providing surveillance and secu-^i,7 to lot users and should be continued. Use of the Park and Ride has had a dramatic reversal. Before the surveillance installation, the Park and Ride was experiencing a declining use trend, We had received namerous complaints that the lot was unsafe and that people were going to stop using the lot -some were going to stop ridesharing-beca::se of theft and vandalism. Many of the lot users, by the way, are residents of Diamond Bar. Since the surveillance installation, the 'ct on the east side of Diamond Bar Blvd. is al -cost always at or near capacity. The lot on the other side of the street is regularly at 50 to 75% capacity* and is noticeably increasiz g. There ha•.e been no incidents of auto theft or vandalism, There was one incident where a part was stolen from a pickup trti:ck which was parked in the west side lot in an obscured location. That pickup truck owner is still using the lot, but is now parking close to the mobile home installation. We attribute the increased use of the lot directly to the surveillance installation and we feel that it is sti2ulating ridesharing in the Diamond bar ccrll�:nity. The project was even nominated for a state vide award in "Excellence in Trsnspertation Facilities" in a safety category. .fudged by an outside agency panel, it won, as a cost effective program to ccpe with an ongoing problem. Diamond Bar April 9, 1991 psi;ea Two k'e are in the process of making signs to place at the lot entran.ces indicating the surveillance -host presence. Tie have leafletted the cars in the lot informing the ridesharers, We are also interested in having a community wide announcement and could use your advice on what might be available, including a city newsletter. We have had our landscaping department study the landscaping issue. They basically recommended that, we not do anything. One of the factors was that. our shrubbery Water system would possibly have to be shut off because of the drought. At this point we are open, to suggestions, We could have the residents remcve their plants if you feel that this is a negative appearance to the community. I w_11 call you to schedule a 'meeting to flurther discuss these matters. Sincere y, 06GINAL VWD P T. 8l.J►NK TERRY BLANK Senior Transp•:,rtation Planner Public Transportation and Ridesharing Branch AGENDA NO. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: April 9, 1991 MEETING DATE: April 16 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Revision of the Resolution (No. 89-43) Authorizing the County of Los Angeles to Contractually Provide General Services to the City of Diamond Bar - Deletion of Business License Services. - = - _ BACKGROUND: The City of Diamond Bar incorporated, on April 18, 1989. Upon incorporation, the City adopted the Los Angeles County Codes. The Codes were to be the policy framework for governing and managing the private and public constituencies, with which the City was or would be doing business. The City entered into a municipal services agreement, with the County of Los Angeles, which provides for the County to administer specified provisions of the Codes, on June 6, 1989. At the same time, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-43. This resolution set forth a list of municipal services that the County was to provide, under the General Services agreement. One of the specified Code provisions the County was to be administer was Title 7, Business Licenses. Title 7, of the County Codes, was established to regulate certain categories of commercial and industrial business activities (list attached). The business license application, investigation and hearing procedures are designed to closely regulate the ownership, location and operation of a Code specified business. The types of businesses, included in Title 7, are those that are generally zone and location sensitive, due to the nature of their operation. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: Robert L. Van City Manager Nort (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) ---------------------- Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney W r wr w - cv`/ w "----------------- Terrence L. Belanger Assistant City Manager BUSINESS LICENSES PAGE TWO The County has established an extensive and comprehensive interdepartmental referral/investigation procedural process, as well as, a field inspection operation. The County has also established a Business License Commission, which conducts hearings and determines whether to grant, deny, modify, suspend and revoke licenses. The County Tax Collector, administrator of Title 7, sets the fees for business licenses. Under the provisions of Title 7, there are currently an estimated 160 business licenses issued, within the City. The entire business license activity is administered, by the County. The only active City involvement in the business license procedural process is the zoning review done by the Planning Department. The General Services contract, with the County, has a five year term, which expires on June 30, 1995. However, the City does have the right to either terminate or change the range of contract services, by giving thirty (30) days written notice, which would be effective as of the first day of July of any given year. Recently, the matter of the feasibility of undertaking the administration of the business license provisions of Title 7 has been raised. The general issue related to the establishing of an all-inclusive (commercial, industrial and home occupation) business license ordinance has been discussed, several times over the past year. Aside from the Title 7 business license provisions, the establishment of an all-inclusive business license ordinance has not been undertaken. The possibility of taking over the administration and enforcement of Title 7 provisions raises significant policy issues. The issues should be discussed prior to the determination of removing business license administration and enforcement, from the list of contract services (Reso. No. 89-43), which are provided through the General Services agreement. Among these policy issues are: 1. Whether all commercial, industrial and home occupation business activities are to be regulated and licensed? 2. Whether only the existing Title 7 specified commercial and industrial business categories are to be regulated and licensed? 3. Whether there is to be no business regulation, through licensing? 4. Whether the business license provisions are to be strictly and universally enforced or enforced on a case by case complaint basis? 5. Whether the business license procedural process is to be administered; by City staff, a contractor or a combination of both? 6. Whether the provisions, in Title 7, should be modified to either include or exclude business license categories? 7. Whether the business license procedural processing fees are to be set and public hearing requirements accomplished, through an existing Commission, a newly established Commission or the City Council? 8. Whether business license provisions are to be regulatory or ministerial (revenue -raising) or a combination of the two? BUSINESS LICENSE PAGE THREE The existing business licensing procedural process is one that is quite labor intensive. The process, which has a strict enforcement basis, involves extensive field inspection and investigation, application processing (initial and renewal), interdepartmental application referral and investigation, Business License Commission hearings and application status determination and other related activities. The City, if it were to undertake Title 7 administration on a strict enforcement basis, would not be able to administer the process with existing staff. Current City staff levels would have to be increased to administer the business license provisions. The underlying regulatory purpose of Title 7 requires a more comlex application, investigation, public hearing, issuance, compliance and renewal process. The County has been asked to suspend the business license process for thirty (30) days, in order allow the Council and staff to fully study the regulatory and organizational impacts related to Title 7 administration and enforcement. To that end, staff is in the process of analyzing the appropriate staffing levels necessary to administer the Title 7 business license policy. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct staff, regarding the continuation of Title 7 business license administration, by the County of Los Angeles, under the General Services agreement and Resolution No. 89-43. .� BUSINESS LICENSE REVIEW FEE CODE CHART FEE:. IBUSINESS -_CODE CLASSIFICATION 49 :SOLICITOR - Charity 321 jBOOKSTORE (OTHER THAN ADULT) 322 jBOOKSTORE (ADULT) { 324 !BOTTLE WASHING 325 !BOTTLE WORKS f 326 1BOWLING ALLEY 327 ;COIN OPERATED PHONOGRAPH 328 !COIN OPERATED GAME 329 ;EXHIBITION 330 ;EXPLOSIVES 331 'CAR'NIVAL/CIRCUS 332 iFERTILIZER PLANT 333 !FILLING STATION 335 ;HAY, GRAIN, & FEED DEALER 336 ;HORSEMEAT (UNCOOKED) 339 ;LAUNDERETTE 340 ;L-IVERY STABLE 341 (LOCKSMITH 342 ILOCKSMITH - ITINERANT, 343 (MOTORCYCLE CONTEST -347':NURSERY (PLANT) 50. (PICNIC PARK 351 :PONY RIDE 352 IPOULTRY DEALER 354 :OFF-ROAD VEHICLE TRACK j 358 ';RENDERING PLANT 360 RIFLE RANGE 364 LUMBER- YARD 365 1 SAWMILL 366 !SHOOTING GALLERY 372 ISWIMMING POOL - PUBLIC 374 'CARNIVAL/CIRCUS CONCESSION 375 !TRAVELING SHOW 376 'WEED ERADICATOR 441 ' BILLIARD} ROOM OR CLUB 505 COLD STORAGE WAREHOUSE 533 !ESCORT BUREAU 571 !BOARDING HOUSE 573 !MOTEL -581 'IDENTIFICATION CARD - 594 ;MASSAGE TECHNICIAN i 595 !ACUPRESSURIST 601 'PEDDLER - EDIBLES 602 (PEDDLER - MERCHANDISE 612 'SOLICITOR - Company 612 !SOLICITOR - Individual I 622 ;SCHOOL, PRIVATE 52 ;PUBLIC EATING -Establishments 6':4 ;PUBLIC EATING -Food Establishments 706 :,TOW TRUCK .20�1 BUSINESS LICENSE REVIEW FEE CODE CHART FEE !BUSINESS CODE ;CLASSiFiC=.? 707 TOW TRUCK ::,'CITY LICENSE 710 'GASOLINE 07L TANK TRUCKS 721 MOTOR VEHICLE - RENTAL 732 VALET P,,R4I\G 751 1)FM0 'STRATOR 760 GU DEALER 785 VACATION CERTIFICATE 841 C.]kRD OR GAME CLUB 1111 REBOUND TUMBLING CENTER 1112 !RIDES (ML•CHANICAL) 1251 FUNERAL ESCORT SEPVICE 1252 FUNERAL ESCORT RIDER 1278 :PRIVATE PATRCL SERVICE 1279 'PRIVATE PATROLMAN 1325 FOC\DRY 1333 'OIL TOOL ::C 1343 PAWNBROKER 1352 SECONDHAND DEALER - Regular 1353 !SECONDHAND DEALER - Charity 354 !SALVAGE DEALER _ 56 S,"ICAC- CCLLECTOR 1500 TAXICAB DRIVER W CITY LICENSE 1501 'TAXICAB DRIVER 1502 'TAXICAB OPERATOR 1 03T11'XICAB VEHICLE 1573 �,,ATER Taxi - OPERATOR 1574 WATER T.AXT - BOAT 1888 ! DUMP:'DISPOSAL SITE 1889 TRANSFER STA TION/RECYCLER 2011 'DANCE - TAX! DANCE 2020 -DANCE - ,ADULT 2021 'DANCE - SINGE 2023 'DANCE - YOUTH%CHARITY 2171 'SKATING RING 2 19 11 TA':! DANCER & INSTRUCTOR 2311 TRADE-IN DEALER 2422 CLOSING -OUT SALE 2501 ;SOUND TRUCK 2615 'MODEL' STUDIO 2714 ;PICTURE ARCADE (GENERAL) 2715 PICTURE :ARCADE (ADULT) 2732:MAN 'A'GER-ENTERTAI;IMENT, 2809 ENTERTAINMENT WITH DANCE 2810 (ENTERTAINMENT (ADULT) _Z811 ;ENTERTAIN}TENT WITHOUT DANCE 3171 !PROMOTER (CHARITABLE) 3172 OUTDOOR FESTIVAL 3231 ;GAME ARCADE 3341 THEATERS - Other than Adult 3342 'THEATERS - Adult BUSINESS LICENSE REVIEW --- - -_ - FEE CODE CHART -- FEE (BUSINESS CODE :CLASSIFICATION _ 3531 (BINGO MANAGER 3581 IBINGO EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER 3614 !RODEO 3802 !BINGO OPERATOR 4040 jMOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR-General 4041 !MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR-Body & Fender 4042 ;MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR-Painting 5611 !HOG RANCH 5721 lAPARTMIENT WITH 5 - 10 units 5722 ;APARTMENT WITH 11-15 units 5723 ;APARTMENT WITH 16+ units 5731 ;HOTEL WITH 5 - 10 units 5732 !HOTEL WITH 11-15 units 5733 !HOTEL WITH 16+ units 5911 ;MASSAGE PARLOR 5912 !HEALTH CLUB/SPA 5913 'ACUPRESSURE ESTABLISHMENT j 9000 JPEDDLER - VETERAN AGENDA NO.1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: April 11, 1991 MEETING DATE: Aril 16 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Irwin M. Kaplan, City Planner, Emeritus SUBJECT: Economic Development Strategy Attached is a proposal for the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy, which was submitted by the firm of Kotin, Regan and Mouchly at our request. A meeting was held on April 4 with Allan Kotin, Councilmembers Papen and Nardella, representatives from the Chamber of Commerce and staff. The purpose of the discussion was to design a workshop which would result in an economic development strategy for Diamond Bar. Although Mr. Kotin originally proposed a one -day community workshop, the partic- ipants at the April 4 meeting felt that the process would not succeed unless the workshop: 1. Is preceded by an educational process in which there is discussion of the issues having to do with revenue generation, the trade-offs involved with dif- ferent economic development policies, and the risks and rewards associated with pursuing a particular development policy, and 2. Is designed to expand the opportunity for broad community participation in the process. As a result of the meeting, the attached proposal was submitted, at a cost of $8,500.00, which incorporated both the educational and public participation pro- cesses by piggybacking the program on to an expanded General Plan Advisory Com- mittee (GPAC) effort. Shortly after the workshop is concluded, an action docu- ment would be prepared which would summarize the results of the workshop, out- line the next steps for those strategies for which there is consensus and sug- gest roles and responsibilities for key players whose participation is needed to advance the effort. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $8,500.00 Budgeted Amount $ N/A In Account Number Deficit: $ N/A Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belanger City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manage SENT BY:KOTIN REGAN MOUCI.H Y : 4—'1-91 ; 4:i4PM ; 1213E20"703—GriY OF DIAMOND E=.P, :» G KOTIN. REGAN & MOUCHLY. Inc. Rea! Estate Consultants 11611 San Vlcerte Bou!eva,d Suite 700 Los Angeles, California 90,049 213,'820.0900 FAX:213i82C•1'u3 April 11, 1991 Mr. Robert L. Van Nort City ,'slanager City of Diamond Bar 21600 East Copley Dri•:e Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765 RE: ECONOMIC DEVELDPPOENr STECATE',`f CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL Dear Mr. Van Nort. I enjoyed very much the opportunity to n-eet v, itis you, your collea.ar}es on the City staff- and representatives of the community and ON, Council or: Apri1 7 in your offices. As a result of that meetinb, Kotin, Re an & t-,loucl;l;��, Inc. tKRNA1 is pleased to submit an expanded and zl refined proposal for consulting se vices. Tics letlar represents a more formai and Netter defined proposal than the prior conceptua; proposal dated April 1, ? 991 and fully sup-arsedes that proposal in all respects. As you requested, I have attemot_d to incorporate into this revised' and expanded proposal many of the issues that wtiere raised at the i-neeting, with respect to the character and future of the community. I have also addressed the issue of preparation for an economic development strategy meeting v;ith emphasis on d, -Mi ing a better connection in the mind of many of the community planning participants bet,,nel-n economic development land use and other pure "planninb elements. 6ackaround and Framti v-cirk of issues Based on earlier discussions `with lrry n Kaplan, as well as our meeting yesterday, it appears t KRM that there is a group of interrelated issues v,+ich col'ectively constitute the framework for determining an economic development strategy. These issues appear to fall into four ma or categc,ries which are listed beiovv in no particular order of importance or precedence: 1. Maintaining and, ideally, improving the busin_ss environment within the City as reflected in two possibly ways: improvi;;g market support for existing businesses and expanding the business base. SENT BY:KUTIN RECAN NICUCiLY . 4-11-91 , 4:15PM . 12132201703 -CITY OF DIr.1VIOND BAR ;9 C KOT 1N, REGAN & ,-MOUCHLY (rc. Economic Development Strategy Consulting Services Proposal April 11, 1991 2. Identifying the character of non-residential development in the area explicitly and determining vrhether or not the office, retail and other non-residential elements of Diamond Bar should be 'high end" in a manner consistent with the current housing prices or should be targeted to serge a brcader incon-ie-based market population. 3. A focus on centra[ and integrated nevv non-residential deveioprnent versus geographically externa' or development of such uses on the periphery of the City. 4. Identification and establishment of a balance between ne,,ng revenue sources as between rae�ty tai -generating deveopme 1t and beer mechanisms to tax the existing population, Listening to the group; some other asp_cts of conirnunit,, awareness and other elements became apparent in ti;t discus3ion. Perhaps the most important one of these is that the current GPAC, which is reviewing the proposed general pian, is dealing almost extilzusi e;y with land use elements and has riot dra.vn u1e ccnrection betvYeen land use elements, fiscal impact and the ultimate economic heait,l of the communi•rd. Gine of the participants yesterday mentioned the fact that there is a lame faction that fa ,crs maintaining the present lana use mix Which, Without any mater.al change, \would sustain and perhaps intensify the potential economic problems of an inadequate commercial base to support the required communi�f services. We at IC NA feel it is critical that this connection be established in the minds of those reviewing the plan before the pier i_ adopted. An econornic development strategy cannot and should not be developed separately frDrn a nes. general plan, particularly if the t%.vo are being considered at all contemporaneously, Another factor which emerged is " at the trade-offs or issues having to do `vith revenue generation are not widely understood. The risks and reg-:,ards associated with attract<ng maior retail development reed to be explored and discussed. They are materially different if the retail development is, in fact, a part pf an internal high-er.c+ or specialty, environment as distinguished from perip'nerai high volume mic die -to -low-income_ mass merchandising along the freeway. This leads to the related fact that geographic decisions as to land use also are re! -ted very much to economic develop nnent strategies. They have very different implications for the success of the local merchant base and different implications for the competitive position that the City may find itself in v,ith respect to other cities in the Route 60 corridor. One fact did seem to emerge as a theme for an economic development strategy, namely tha` the eastern. San Gabriel Valley lacks a 'high-end" focus for retail, office or mixed-use deve'opment. it may be that Diamond Bar is a sultab!e place for such development. 2 SENT BY:KOTIN REG%.N MOUCHLY . 4-11-91 : 4=17DNI . 121382C1703 -CITY OH DiAMCND BAR :t 4 KOTIN. REGAN & iiMIOI"CHLY. inc. Economic Development St-ategy Consoling Services Proposa' April 11, 1991 Proposed Scope of Services KRM proposes a three-phase consulting effort along the foliowin,g general lines: Phase 1 Dewelop with City staff and designated other community participants a series of issue lists with pros and cons for distribution at CPAC meetings and other public events to raise public awareness and sol;cit public comment to the extent that it is forthcoming. Phase 2 Within Nvo to three months, review the results of this Phase 1 outreach program and conduct a series of intensive debriefings with community representatives. counsel "or City Council; and staff to form an agenda oriented to specific issues and critical questions for an economic development strate. mee`in`. Phase 3 Conduct and subsequent'fy document an economic development strategy rr,eeti ng. The Phase 1 effortwc—iuld largely be a&isdry grid ,v,2 jld probably in-,.olve one extended session similar to the one on April ? but this time taking careful notes and developing, a series of issues. The purpose here ,vould not be in-depth analysis b;.t rather consciousness -raisin, showing the pros and cons and problems and benefits of different courses of action so that they may be brought up at the GPAC meeti lg. for PUVIc comment. !his publl- CO^iment I important to solicit for iNVO 'I-riticai rea5Cns. First, there are people who %viii tee' cheated if the ultimate strategy meeting is not a public meetinig, At the same time, this strategy' meeting should not be an open public hearing or it vJIl degenerate and not focus. It is also important that all potential objectors be given the opportunity to voice their opinions so that they do not ,eel left out of the process, The second phase of the proposed effort is tl-:e preparation of a clear agenda and well defined issues for an economic development strategy meeting. included `.vithin this 1Vould be selecting the attendees and the observers, 1 stress the word observers rather than andfence because, while this could be broadcast on a public basis, it should not be a large public meeting if it is to be effective and focused. The critical output of the second phase would be a briefing book and agenda for the meeting distributed to the participant, and, at VGur discretion, the observers as :veil. The third and final phase of the effort �tiould be undertaken at a one -day meeting with a lunch break at a selected location within the City. That meeting would involve myself as a moderator, a key staff member of my firm as a coordinator and a trained 'facilitator" to record and structure the inforr^ation and ideas as they flow through the group. SENT BY:KOTIN RECA14 MOUCHLY . 4-1":-91 . 4:19PM . 12139201703 -C -T Y OF DIAMOND BAER. .« 5 KOTIN. RECAN & XIOUCNLY Inc. Econo^tic Development Strategy Consu:ting Services Proposal April 11, 1991 The output of this phase would be both the meeting itself and whatever elements of consensus or agreement that emerged as well as a document summarizing the meeting. The document would, to the extent that the meeting generated consensus, provide an outline of a formal economic development strategy. It would in any case provide clear discussion of the issues creating a deveiopmer;t strategy and the extent to which there was a consensus. In areas of agreement, prerequisites for inlplenlentation would be identified together with elements of a near-term action program. Budget and Schedule Since the CPAC meeti;;gs meet r-nonthiy, the schedule for Phase 1 may require 60 -90 days since we would have to prepare the material and then distribute it presumably at two successive CPAC meetings. Civen the general fiotiv of seasonal activity, this Prase 1 timetable suggest-, that the econornic development strategy meeting itself would be held at the end of the summer or beginning of the fall in September, it might be possible to get it into June or July but 1 think that might reduce the attendance level. With respect to budget, KRM would be prepared to undertake the entire effort for a budget of approximately $8,500. While KRM would comr crit oily to a total buds v t, we hae provided below for your information a tentative breakdown of the budget as bet,veen phases. Phase................................................$1,0100 Phase' ............... .....i ......................¢3,000 Phase................................................ $y5�G Total..................................................$8500 The cost of Phase 3 includes the retention of a formai facilitator and the preparation of both the initial briefing book and subsequent report. The client will be charged oniy for tine actual costs incurred by KRM in accordance vvith its standard rate schedule, a copy of whicl, is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and made a part of any agreement between the City and KRM. In addition, the client will be billed monthly for costs incurred to date and all bills are due and payable in 30 days. Qualifications KRNA has enclosed with this proposal a copy of its corporate brochure and a copy of our selected assignments showing a wide range of public and private transactions. KRM would A SENT BY:KOTIN REGAN MOt.0;1LY , 4-11-31 ! 4:2C'F'M . 121382U703-ZITY OF DIAMOND BAR ;# r WTIN, REGAN & MOUCHLY Inc. Economic Development Strategy Co suidng Services Proposal April 11, 1991 specifically direct you to David Davis, Director of Planning and Community Deve!opment for the City of Santa Barbara. As I discussed in our meeting, community, meetir g are not a primary fccus of our business. Our major experience in the area of community outreach meetings is with Davis in a growth management strategy meeting we chaired for him. He may be reached at (805) 564-5455. Authorization and .Acceptance if this proposal meets with your approval, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us as authorization to commerce vYork. If your City procedures require a di*fere^t fora: of contract or purchase order, please feel fre- to prepare such a contract for our review provided that it includes directly or by reference the critical eliF-�nlenls of this proposal and the a=tacned E.rhibit A. The consulting effort will be cenducted and nlanaged by i.e. I vlilt he assisted by DaVda Seliger, who v,,ill preparo- thc, :actual roporL and brio ing mator!al� u+tJt?r my Eup@rv'Eion. As 1 mentioned in ot;r meeting, I think this is a particuladv eNCiting and unusual challenge. Both the change in the real estate marke. and the particular posit oin in the City's history provide significant challenge and a real opp,ort-mitt' to shape tutus grotivth. AGREED TO AND D Ami T HOR ZED BY: (Comp any) (Name; (Title) cc: IrAtin Kaplan, City Planner Emeritus Enclosure c:\rltES1'N1sS199\�:T\OSARKRC :ADKI3 5 Respl ctiully suhrl.i vii. Allan D. KoLin (Date; SENT BY:KOTIN REGAN MOUCHLY . 4-11.-91 , 4:21PM , KOTIN, REGAN & ,,'I04-.;'CHLY Inc. Real Estate Consultants 1,1611 Sar Vicente BDulavard Suite 700 Los Angeles, Ca?ifornia 2010419 �i3.'820-0900 FAX: 213,8241703 1213320170 --CITY 0= C?-.+�Ofv'L' B4,R :# 7 Exhibit .A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES 1991 5111 -PIG POUC;£s 1. Bills are due am,' Yatable in full v i.hi;r =;f1 dia},5 c.f invoice gate-. Past due invoices rt,iil accrue interest at Prime plus 2°,. 2, uestiors about hillirgs n us' be addressed i v. rhino to KRM'lcn 21 Ways of dzte of invoice. The absence 19 any, such ingUlr es shall be deemed ackno't'isdgarr,ent Ur fiiJKRM's servi.es ar:d agreerrent with VR -Ws charges for such services. if a dispute arises under we agreement of which ti -is srl-edule is par,, &e Prevailing parry In such d+sp:.:e shall be endued to reasoricble aiUorney'= (ties wid co,,Ls ui .uii- �, �xnarl_t�rtri �rtrh��r�-.nd hyo! Standard Rates Public Aq encies Professional Fees * Hourly Hourly Principals2100 S161,11 Senior Associates 51310 5120 Associates tr1) SGS Astzociates (B) 7;421 Associates (C) $ C:() Other Data Entry 530 Client -Directed Produ_r_i:on SerJces 530 $30 In -House Pro!essio,n Ceniputer Use 515 $15 Designated Contravtoi s Cost 15% Cost 15% Out -of -Pocket Expenses At Cosi At Cost Expert witness tcsirrcny ar:d internat:,nal assignments are subject to s[;ec;z �,:arramen s, 5111 -PIG POUC;£s 1. Bills are due am,' Yatable in full v i.hi;r =;f1 dia},5 c.f invoice gate-. Past due invoices rt,iil accrue interest at Prime plus 2°,. 2, uestiors about hillirgs n us' be addressed i v. rhino to KRM'lcn 21 Ways of dzte of invoice. The absence 19 any, such ingUlr es shall be deemed ackno't'isdgarr,ent Ur fiiJKRM's servi.es ar:d agreerrent with VR -Ws charges for such services. if a dispute arises under we agreement of which ti -is srl-edule is par,, &e Prevailing parry In such d+sp:.:e shall be endued to reasoricble aiUorney'= (ties wid co,,Ls ui .uii- �, �xnarl_t�rtri �rtrh��r�-.nd hyo!