HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/19/1991THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR AIRING ON
CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING THE ROOM, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR
PERMISSION TO BE DATED. ALL COUNCIL MEETING TAPES WILL BE BLACKED
IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING AND WILL UNAVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION
Next Resolution No. 91-12
Next Ordinance No. 1(1991)
5:30 p.m. - CLOSED SESSION - Litigation -
Government Code Section 54956.9
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Werner
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN NARDELLA, PAPEN, KIM, MAYOR
PRO TEM FORBING, MAYOR WERNER
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Council -members
are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting
or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on
each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members
of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar
items or matters of interest to the public that are not already
scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City
Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the
Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the
posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the
City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five
minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent
Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single
motion.
1. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 25, 1991 - 7:00 P.M.,
W.V.U.S.D., Board Rm., 880 S. Lemon Ave.
B. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - MARCH 28, 1991 -
7:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave.
C. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - APRIL 2, 1991 - 6:00 P.M.,
W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
D. 2ND ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION - APRIL 13, 1991 -
7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Diamond Bar High School
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Budget Study Session of February 26,
1991 and Regular Meeting of March 5, 1991.
3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated March
19, 1991 in the amount of $190,622.27.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 MARCH 19, 1991
4. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES - Receive and file Parks
and Recreation Commission Minutes of February 14, 1991 and
February 28, 1991.
5. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Receive and file Planning
Commission Minutes of February 25, 1991.
6. SEATAC MINUTES - Receive and file SEATAC Minutes of February
4, 1991.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, URGING ALL CITIZENS AND WATER USERS IN THE
COMMUNITY TO COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR AND THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - In support
of the 30% mandatory water conservation program initiated by
the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in
cooperation with the Walnut Valley Water District commencing
April 1, 1991.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX urging all
citizens and water users in the community to comply with
regulations set forth by the City and the Walnut Valley Water
District.
8. FINAL MAP #18722 COUNTRY HILLS - On December 23, 1987, the
County of Los Angeles conditionally approved Tentative Parcel
Map No. 18722. The project consists of commercial lots on
approximately 8.26 acres known as Country Hills Towne Center.
The applicant has not filed a Final Map. Staff has reviewed
the map and has found that it conforms with the Subdivision
Map Act and City Ordinances.
Recommended Action: Approve the attached Final Map No. 18722;
(2) authorize the City Engineer to execute the map and (3)
direct the City Clerk to certify and process it for
recordation.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT- MEDIAN RECONSTRUCTION; LANDSCAPE
MODIFICATIONS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION ON GRAND AVENUE
AT SHOTGUN LANE - On February 19, 1991, the City Council
authorized advertising for bids for median reconstruction,
landscape modification, and traffic signal installation on
Grand Ave. at Shotgun Ln. Formal bids were received on March
12, 1991 from eight contractors. The low bid received was
from Intersection Maintenance Service in the amount of
$69,263.00.
Recommended Action: Award contract to Intersection
Maintenance Service and authorize staff to proceed with
construction of the project.
10. AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF $800 AS CITY'S SHARE IN PURCHASE OF
A COMPUTER SYSTEM TO AID IN CONTROL OF GANGS - In cooperation
with neighboring cities and the Walnut Valley Unified School
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3 MARCH 19, 1991
District.
Recommended Action: Authorize expenditure.
11. LETTER OF INTENT TO SUPPORT LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S BID
TO HOST 1993 CALIFORNIA POLICE BUNKER GAMES - Requested by
Sheriff Sherman Block for support to bring this non-profit
event to the San Gabriel Valley in 1993.
Recommended Action: Approve preparation of a Letter of Intent
and authorize the Mayor to sign said letter on behalf of the
City Council.
12. PATHFINDER BRIDGE PROJECT CITY -COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT -
Agreement between the City and the County of Los Angeles for
the reconstruction of the Pathfinder Bridge.
Recommended Action: Approve the Agreement with the County of
Los Angeles and authorize the City Clerk to submit it to the
County upon execution by the City.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF
PROPOSITION A (LOCAL RETURN TRANSIT FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF
COMMERCE GENERAL FUNDS - LACTC permits cities to exchange
their Prop. A funds between cities in Los Angeles County,
provided each City identifies a need for such exchange. The
City of Commerce has expressed interest in exchanging their
general fund monies for $500,000 of Prop A funds. The
proposed exchange rate is $.60 of unrestricted general fund
monies for $1.00 in Prop A funds. The proposed exchange of
the City's Prop A funds does not impact our transit needs.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX authorizing
and approving the exchange of Prop A (Local Return Transit
Funds) for the City of Commerce General Fund.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - Proclamations, certificates, etc.
14. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - Presentation of Certificate of
Appreciation to John Park, Diamond Bar Cleaners for service to
the Community.
15 PROCLAMATION - "OPERATION DESERT HOME" - Proclamation in
support of Operation Desert Home.
16. PROCLAMATION - April 1 through 7, 1991 as "PUBLIC HEALTH WEEK"
OLD BUSINESS:
17. 2ND ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION - Update by Admin. Analyst Kellee
Fritzal regarding the 2nd Anniversary Celebration scheduled
for Saturday, April 13, 1991.
Recommended Action: Direct staff as necessary.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 MARCH 19, 1991
18. CONTRACT ENGINEERING SERVICES - Due to present staffing
levels, it is necessary to contract for services with firms
specializing in traffic and transportation mattes. Continued
from March 5, 1991 meeting.
Recommended Action: Either 1) direct staff to contract with
consultants on a single -source basis or 2) contract with
consultants from an open list on a rotation basis.
19. ORDINANCE NO. 8A (1990) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING SECTIONS 3203 AND 3204, OF
TITLE 26 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, AS
HERETOFORE ADOPTED, PERTAINING TO ROOF COVERING REQUIREMENTS
- First reading on March 5, 1991.
Recommended Action: Approve for 2nd reading by title only,
waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 8A (1990)
amending Sections 3203 and 3204 of Title 26 (Building Code) o
the Los Angeles County Code.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
20. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
91-1 AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47722 TO PERMIT THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A THIRTEEN LOT SINGLE FAMILY UNIT RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT ON A NINETEEN ACRE SITE, ZONED BOTH R-1-10,000 AND R-
1-40,000 AND LOCATED WEST OF DERRINGER LANE, NORTH OF
RIDGELIKE ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - Continued from March 5, 1991, for
approval of a tentative tract map to develop thirteen (13)
custom single family homes on a 19.08 acre site located with
"The Country" on Derringer Lane. An Environmental Impact
Report has been prepared describing the impacts the proposed
development may cause to the environment and mitigation
measures to those impact.
Recommended Action: Receive staff report, take public
testimony and adopt Resolution No. 91 -XX approving EIR 91-1
and TTM 47722 with the findings of fact and listed conditions.
21. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO INTERIM ORDINANCE 15-A (1990)
PERTAINING TO QUASI -PUBLIC USES WITHIN C -M ZONE - In
November, 1990, the Council requested that the Planning
Commission review the appropriateness of reintroducing the
church uses into the CM Zone. The Planning Commission
recommended that quasi -public uses be permitted in the Zone
subject to certain standards and restrictions.
Recommended Action: Receive staff report, take public
testimony and direct staff as necessary.
NEW BUSINESS:
22. REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL - swearing-in of John Forbing
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 MARCH 19, 1991
as Mayor and Jay C. Kim as Mayor Pro Tem, effective April 1,
1991.
23. COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
Recommended Action: Confirm appointments made by Mayor
Forbing effective April 1, 1991.
ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember
to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at the next
regular meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
Litigation - Section 54956.9
Personnel - Section 54957.6
ADJOURNMENT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.v�,�
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM: 4YYl
ADDRESS:
f
ORGANIZATION: }
SUBJECT: �A 'V-) Q>
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name an ddT as(-ulritten above.
Sig a re
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the 4ity Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
City Clerk r
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name anaddress as wri ten above.
g ature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and addre he City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: ' < V,4 , - -511
TO: City Clerk
FROM:i�n/?�
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATIONS
SUBJECT: I YC'�C /l�'<'fiC y k)CZI IL--. ;L
I expect to address the Council on the subjectagenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name ani address as wri ten above.
g ature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and addre he City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. -11 rY
DATE:
3 ka,,00
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS: cC�C . `l . '3 �'� t CarnA.St
ORGANIZATION: I ` - CaA 64
SUBJECT:.-�.�'�
I expect to address the Council on t s j e a item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name an ad r en above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: 13 / f - y-)
TO: City Clerk
FROM: 67 & 1!l Zd".1
1-9114 � ae of
ADDRESS: - �W, d ll-� k/,Vd a- ,,
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT: 7", / P,0,aa k,7n�, 17 .goat em G�T�
I expect to address the Council on t e subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name a address as.written above.
"Te-jeignature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
(NOTE: Completing and signing this form is voluntary)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. 'j
DATE: % ? e,%
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS: (000-0 No. C`)D�DL--w/ C�i14��` �V �l�9YlQ)1� &R,, CA -5/7155
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT: k��t �'�'�`' C , i`'.- �' 1��1� �- �_` ( ► `t/
I expect to address the Council on the subject nda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address a ritte bove.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
(NOTE: Completing and signing this form is voluntary)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. Z J
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM: L , � 2 vl-(; n � 2
ADDRESS: Z Z g3 7 14 1 L., mv P4c--Ai1 bit -�k- i � � � EJ � I C
ORGANIZATION: hesI f),eN+
SUBJECT: �Y U �p�2d /4 m f)m eN f 0 riU �I� c22 i r, U2A1►�v ce J�%o. / S 4 �i9a,
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
�ure
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
'NOTE: Completing and signing this form is voluntary)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. ---21
DATE: ;�/j Gj/cf /
TO: City Clerk
FROM: /- , X7uS'. •+,—
ADDRESS: /M`T SSI• CL��Hv�2�-� 2•- %i.4rrv�0 �''� c/1 6,S-
ORGANIZATION:s,Ji /��n���4✓�
SUBJECT: /�S l - �UBGiG f'SS- ✓r ice' C - /�% �n��
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
(NOTE: Completing and signing this form is voluntary)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: 311 -
TO:
lTO: City Clerk///
FROM:
ADDRESS: � �- (� (�' bi ( C L L c,�1 ��, iC'ZZ ✓mss •
ORGANIZATION:
�.% y. t
SUBJECT: l ` -E /� '%,4J) - � �/e C'
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and',addre" as tten a e.
Signatur�
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. 21
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
��t
�.
l
FROM:
: � L
ADDRESS: i
�Lj
��'t�� .��? �` '}
. • °,
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
I expect to address the
Council
on the subject
agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect
my
name and,'address as
written above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may
attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist
the Mayor in ensuring
that all persons wishing
to address the Council
are
recognized and to ensure
correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE: /
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS: �(� / V �G GI 174A V-
ORGANIZATION:�Q
f� Qn
SUBJECT:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and addres a written gnat itten abov
Sir
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
City Clerk
Ca
alam rA d I",r-Gk917 5
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name apd address as written above.
Sig ture
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
(NOTE: Completing and signing this form is voluntary)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY CO�JI�CIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. G
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM: I \ ;� C l I N Cd K �,-
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION: 1— V A C -\r I �=
SUBJECT: �'C 5 1 % 1-j � � � �j S �` C ` M -Z `U
I expect to address the Council one subject a nda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name d d ess 'tten above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
G,
DATE: 'x�-511
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:�J�f�1�
SUBJECT: ! � /d'ANC y `( � %%f ✓L 1
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name ani address as wri iten above.
1, % t^�_---•.�J�-�_ ,,.
ture
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and addre City council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE:
TO: City Clerk
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written,above.
Signature tom_
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. '� t
( , - 0 3
City Clerk
jJjd/� 4
t3ta,i
Caw
I expect to address the Council on t s j e a item. Please have the
Council Minutes reflect my name an ad rY en above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the City Council. This
form is intended to assist the Mayor in ensuring that all persons wishing
to address the Council are recognized and to ensure correct spelling of
names in the Minutes.
MINVTSB of ssa ozwv oovsIATT-
BUDGET STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 26, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 6:08
p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S.
Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE: by C/Kim.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Pro Tem Forbing, Councilmen Nardella, Papen,
and Kim. Mayor Werner arrived at 6:30 P.M.
Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort,
Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger,
Planning Director James DeStefano, City Engineer
Sid Mousavi and City Clerk Lynda Burgess.
Mission Statement CM/Van Nort stated that the Council had instructed
staff to prepare a Mission Statement to define
their plans for the next several years.
C/Papen felt that the Mission Statement prepared
was very proactive; however, she recommended using
"businesses" instead of "clients."
C/Nardella agreed with C/Papen's comments and
suggested that the statement be published in order
to receive public comment at the next Council
meeting.
CM/Van Nort suggested that Council review the
documents received, schedule the matter for the
next agenda and, after reaching consensus,
publish the document for public input.
Following discussion, staff was directed to bring
back the Mission Statement on March 5, 1991.
Budget Discussion CM/Van Nort presented for discussion the analyses
of funding levels between the City and other L.A.
and Orange County Cities prepared by staff in
anticipation of the 1991-92 budget process.
He then presented the budget calendar setting
forth a timetable for staff to prepare documents
to be submitted to the Council in May. He asked
for input on scheduling of an April 9, 1991
workshop for review of the objectives and proposed
achievements for the 1991-92 fiscal year; and a
budget workshop on May 2, 1991.
Following discussion, Council requested that both
meetings be held at 7:00 p.m.
ACM/Belanger discussed the methodology used in
comparing other cities' fiscal arrangements with
Diamond Bar's. Cities studied included Brea, Dana
Point, Laguna Niguel, Mission Viejo, Temple City,
FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE 2
Walnut and Yorba Linda. He further stated that
each department would be presenting an overview of
the activities of their respective departments and
provide comparisons of data regarding employment
and expenditure levels. He then made a visual
presentation of data prepared by staff showing
estimated revenues for 1990-91 of $9,027,000 with
current staffing of 21 full time and 6 part time
employees.
Following discussion, ACM/Belanger reported that
the Department of Administration consists of six
staff members handling such responsibilities as
finance, personnel, risk management and adminis-
tration of all city staff.
CM/Van Nort stated that staff is looking at
possible changes for law enforcement for the 1991-
92 fiscal year including utilizing motorcycle
officers, meaning that one squad car would be
exchanged for two motorcycle officers. The
addition of a gang investigator and a narcotics
officer to work out of the Walnut Sheriff's
station (cost to be shared with other cities also
operating out of the Walnut station) is also being
considered.
CC/Burgess detailed the City Clerk's Department
and responsibilities. She indicated that the two
and one-half employees in the department is
approximately average with other cities in the
study.
Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel
reported that his department includes three full
time staff members as well as the part time
services of Admin. Analyst Kellee Fritzal and part
time clerical support.
CM/Van Nort stated that, due to revenue restric-
tions experienced during the first six months and
anticipated levels in the 1991-92 fiscal year, he
recommended that the recreation proposal for the
91-92 fiscal year be kept at the same level that
is presently being performed by the Walnut Valley
Recreation District. He requested Council
comments on the recommendation.
C/Nardella agreed with CM/Van Nort's recommenda-
tion.
C/Papen asked if fees being charged to the City by
the Walnut Valley School District have been
budgeted in the Parks and Recreation Department.
FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE 3
CM/Van Nort stated that facility costs had been
revised and total charges for maximum usage would
be less than 5,000 and would be included within
the $180,0004 -$150,000 of which would be contract
services administered by the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
CE/Mousavi reported on the responsibilities
carried out by the City Engineer's Department and
stated that there are two and one-half employees
in his department, along with contracting with Ron
Kranzer & Assoc. for consulting engineering. He
is also looking at hiring an intern and a recep-
tionist.
CM/Van Nort stated that the City will receive
additional funds in the area of traffic and
transportation due to the passage of Proposition
111. This measure requires each city to have a
Traffic Congestion Management plan and will
provide additional monies locally for street
improvements. In addition to Prop 111, the City
will also receive monies from Prop C, 20% of which
will be for local maintenance, and may receive
funds from discretionary grants and the Air
Quality Management Plan. Based on this, the City
Engineer's Department will be in need of an
additional 1/2 person which would be funded by
both Prop 111 and Prop C.
Planning Director James DeStefano spoke regarding
the Planning Department's responsibilities and
functions carried out by Building and Safety. He
stated that his department consists of five full-
time and 2 part-time employees and a Planning
Consultant.
In response to C/Kim's question, ACM/Belanger
stated the cities selected for comparison were
chosen for a variety of reasons, such as demo-
graphics, socio-economic levels, likeness of
population, likeness of development.
ANNOUNCEMENTS C/Papen suggested that the Council refocus on
economic development. She further suggested that
the Parks and Recreation Department compose a
"wish list" of small capital improvements items
that could benefit the entire City. These
improvements could be items that other organiza-
tions might want as a projects a -s, for example,
did the Diamond Bar Girls Softball League by the
donation of bleachers at Peterson Park. She then
stated that she and Jim DeStefano had met with the
AQMD regarding the 1991 Air Quality Management
Plan. The requirement that businesses submit a
FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE 4
ride -sharing plan has been reduced to provide that
smaller businesses will also be required to submit
a plan. She further requested that staff report
on the status of the solid waste issue at the next
meeting.
C/Kim commended staff on the presentations made
and suggested that staff accompany him to meet
with LACTC regarding congestion management. He
also requested that staff look into reevaluation
of the Lighting Districts.
C/Nardella requested that PM/Janiel look at the
size of park directional signs again.
CM/Van Nort thanked staff for their efforts in
creating the visual presentations.
CLOSED SESSION: There being no further business to conduct,
M/Werner recessed the meeting to Closed Session
for discussion of Property Acquisition Matters at
8:31 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT: M/Werner reconvened to Regular Session at 9:10
p.m., declared that there was no reportable action
taken and adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
ATTEST:
Mayor
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
KTIMTES OF THE CITY Cvvrrc=n
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MARCH 5, 1991
STUDY SESSION
M/Werner called the Study Session to order at 5:34 p.m.
Mr. Lloyd Zola of The Planning Network stated that at the beginning of
the General Plan process, each Councilmember was interviewed to
identify issues and directions for the City. This same type of
interview was conducted with the General Plan Committee, where the
Committee put together a "laundry list" of strategies they would like
to pursue, things in the City they would like, issues to solve. The
Committee then refined the list to a set of goals, objectives and
strategies. This list was then submitted to Council and all
Commissions and then a joint workshop was held to review and revise
the list, getting input from other City Commissions and the Council.
The policy portion of the plan is now complete. Then a "futures"
workshop was held, which involved city staff, the City Manager,
Planning Department staff, the City Planner Emeritus, The Planning
Network staff and four professors representing fields of economics,
political science and environmental sciences to discuss "what is the
world going to be like 100 or 200 years from now" and start looking at
solutions "that we like today, the attitudes that we have, do they
make sense in terms of the changes in directions that are going to be
faced?" It is important to GPAC that the City continue to maintain
the quality of life for all residents. In order to maintain this type
of life style, municipal income is necessary." Since the City is
essentially at build out all that is needed is to maintain the
community. It was discovered that the community has a lot more
choices than were apparent. In addition, the City is a recipient of
the decisions made by communities surrounding the City. Therefore,
GPAC will be taking a more regional outlook. A system to force
surrounding communities to look at what the impacts are outside their
jurisdictional boundaries when they make their decisions should be
implemented. The Planning Network is in the process of completing
what is called an "existing setting report" which is an expansion of
the earlier data bases used to devise policies and is being used as
the basis of the environmental impact report which is also partially
completed. They have also completed the first draft of the
development code, which is being reviewed by the Planning Commission,
which outlines a set of standards, basic policies guiding development,
in terms of zoning ordinance regulations, subdivision ordinance
regulations. Mr. Zola then mentioned the Circulation Element that has
been contracted for separately. The Planning Network is working with
DKS to coordinate both efforts and bring to the Planning Commission
and City Council a single General Plan.
Mr. Dan Dunham, Principal with the Planning Network, discussed the
land use map which represents existing land uses within the City.
Options looked into include the potential for intensification of the
commercial usage and what can be done to some of those areas that
might help generate additional revenues. Does the City want regional -
serving or community -serving uses? Three alternative community types
that have been looked at are suburban, master planned with a balance
of community -serving commercial uses and master planned with a balance
of community -serving commercial uses and the addition of some
regionally -oriented, revenue -generated uses. The Committee has not yet
MARCH 5, 1991
PAGE 2
made a decision on what is wanted; however, all three meet the goals,
they all satisfy the quality of life issues, but where they differ is
who is going to pay for the amenities and the quality of life. Under
a bedroom community, the burden falls on the residents. Under the
balanced community, there is a blend of the two and the third is a
higher participation in bringing forth revenues.
CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 6:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S.
Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE: by MPT/Forbing.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Werner, Mayor Pro Tem Forbing, Councilmen
Nardella, Papen and Kim.
Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort,
Assistant City Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City
Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Director of Planning
James DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Mousavi and
City Clerk Lynda Burgess.
COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Papen thanked the public for voting for cityhood
and for supporting the City during the past two
years.
M/Werner announced that U.S. Sprint, the long
distance telephone company, has been mistakenly
charging customers in the 91765 code an 11% city
utility tax for the benefit of City of Pomona. He
suggested that residents were asked look closely
at their utility bills because the City of Diamond
Bar has not instituted any utility tax.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: No public comments were offered.
CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Kim moved, seconded by MPT/Forbing to approve
the Consent Calendar with the exception of the
Approval of Minutes, the Traffic Signal Contract
and the Slurry Seal Award. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN -
NOES: COUNCILMEN -
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN -
Nardella, Papen, Kim,
MPT/Forbing, M/Werner
None
None
Schedule of A. Planning Commission - March 11, 1991 - 7:00
Future Meetings p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Rm., 880 S. Lemon Ave.
B. Parks & Recreation Commission - March 14,
1991 - 7:00 p.m., City Hall, 21660 E. Copley
C. Traffic & Transportation Commission - March
14, 1991 - 6:00 p.m., Community Room, 1061
Grand Ave.
MARCH 5, 1991 PAGE 3
D. City Council Meeting - March 19, 1991 - 6:00
p.m. W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave.
Warrant Register Approved Warrant Register dated March 5, 1991 in
the amount of $489,423.06.
Treasurer's Report Approved Treasurer's Report for the Month of
January, 1991.
Planning Comm. Received and filed Planning Commission Minutes of
Minutes January 28, 1991 and February 11, 1991.
Traffic & Trans. Received and filed Traffic and Transportation
Comm. Minutes Commission Minutes of January 10, 1991.
Denial of Claim Denied Claim for Damages filed by Martha
Plascencia.
Bond Exoneration
Approved work completed and exonerated Bond No. 83
SB 100 327 663, Street Tree Improvements, Tract
No. 42572, vicinity of Highcrest Dr. and Armitos
P1.
Bond Exoneration
Approved work completed at 2053 Rusty Spur Rd.,
Lot No. 115, Tract No. 30091 and exonerated Bond
No. 112 68 66 in the amount of $5,710.
Resolution 91-11
Adopted Resolution No. 91-11 entitled: A
Granting Consent
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT AND JURISDICTION
& Jurisdiction to
TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER
L.A. County in
OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006
Matter of County
AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1 CITY OF
Lighting Maint.
DIAMOND BAR ZONE PROJECT 131-57.
Dist. LLA -1, Zone
Proj. 131-57
Lighting &
Awarded a 3 -year contract for preparation of the
Landscape
Engineer's Report for Lighting and Landscape
Assessment Dist.
Maintenance Assessment Districts to ASL
Contract
Consultants, Inc.
Matters Withdrawn from Consent Calendar:
Approval of C/Kim requested that Page 7 include his comments
Minutes regarding the basis for his voting against the
Public Finance Advisors' Contract.
C/Kim moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to approve the
Minutes of February 19, 1991 as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
Traffic Engnrng. C/Nardella expressed his feeling that the City is
Services being asked to spend more money for services that
Contracts were previously provided or accounted for.
MARCH 5, 1991 PAGE 4
CE/Mousavi stated that staff is not asking for
more funding. The $75,000 was budgeted in July,
1990 as part of the traffic engineering services
and that is the amount that will be spent this
year for the same service. Part of it has already
been spent with other consultants and the County
and the portion of the amount remaining will be
spent during the rest of this year.
C/Kim asked when the Public Hearing would be held
for the Landscaping and Lighting?
CE/Mousavi stated that the first Resolution should
be before the Council at their first meeting in
April with the second in May and the third in
June.
M/Werner stated that he was also concerned about
the contract since it appears that this is an open
contract without knowing precisely what the
services will be and how it fits into the total
realm of the Traffic Engineering Program. He asked
how much is committed to DKS for the Circulation
Element.
CE/Mousavi stated that it was approximately
$125,000.
M/Werner stated that he had received calls from
traffic engineers that have not been a part of the
bid process.
CE/Mousavi stated that the Request for Proposals
had been sent to five consultants believed capable
of providing engineering services or traffic
engineering services.
Following discussion, M/Werner moved to require
staff to rebid the traffic engineering contracts.
Motion died for lack of second.
Following further discussion, C/Papen moved,
C/Nardella seconded to table the matter for two
weeks for staff to have the opportunity to fully
explain how this program fits in with the long
term mission of the Engineering Department.
Motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2 (MPT/Forbing
and C/Kim voting No).
Contract Award - C/Kim asked why the low bid had a lump sum bid of
Slurry Seal $4,000 for marking and delineators when the
IPS Services, Inc. engineer's estimate was $20,000 for this item and
the second lowest bidder bid $11,000.
MARCH 5, 1991
PAGE 5
CE/Mousavi stated that he had not spoken to the
low bidder regarding that particular subject;
however, sometimes contractors put their higher
dollars on the portions of the project that are
complete early in the process in order to be paid
earlier and since the striping is the last thing
done, sometimes that amount will be less. He
further stated that he was comfortable with the
procedure.
C/Papen moved, C/Kim seconded to award the slurry
seal contract to IPS Services, Inc. in the amount
of $123,094.18. With the following Roll Call
vote, the motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Nardella,
MPT/Forbing and M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
Certificate of M/Werner and C/Nardella presented a Certificate
Appreciation - of Appreciation to the Diamond Bar Girls Softball
D.B. Girls League for donation of bleachers at Carlton J.
Softball League Peterson Park.
Mrs. Cindy Morton presented M/Werner with a check
in the amount of $4,000 for purchase of said
bleachers.
Proclamation - Proclaimed the Month of March, 1991 as "American
March, 1991 Red Cross Month."
"American Red
Cross Month"
Proclamation - Proclaimed March 15, 1991 as "Peace Corps Day."
March 15, 1991
"Peace Corps Mr. Philip Vesnesfsy, member of the Peace Corps,
Day" pointed out that the Corps is in its thirtieth
year, not thirteenth, as stated in the
Proclamation.
Presentation -
Mr. John Stall, Vice -President of Cajon Pipeline
Cajon Pipeline
Co., spoke regarding the possible use of Grand
Co. re:
Ave. for delivery of crude oil through an under -
Proposed Oil
ground pipeline from the Kern County/Santa
Pipeline under
Barbara area into the L.A. Basin connecting with
Grand Ave.
an existing pipeline between California and Texas.
Mr. Stall introduced Mr. Ron Hen, President of
Cajon Pipeline and Mr. John Jaquess, consultant.
Mr. Stall indicated that the major impact will be
associated with construction, which would involve
trenching along Grand Ave., installation of the
MARCH 5, 1991 PAGE 6
pipe, back filling and repaving of the street.
The time estimated to install the pipe is 2 to 3
weeks. Construction is scheduled to begin in the
Spring 1992, and can be scheduled to avoid peak
traffic hours. They would work closely with the
City Engineer to assure that there is no disrup-
tion in City services. Benefits to be derived
from having the pipeline are franchise revenues,
property taxes on the pipeline, reduction of air
pollution and the company's participation in
community activities.
C/Papen asked why Grand Avenue had been selected
and whether other streets had been considered.
Mr. Stall stated that they had considered by-
passing the entire city; however, the road they
had looked at is under reconstruction into a
freeway.
In response to C/Forbing's question concerning the
power lines, Mr. Stall stated that his firms would
be looking into the right-of-way situation once
the environmental impact report process has begun.
In response to C/Kim's question regarding
pressure, Mr. Stall indicated that the pipe was
pressurized with 700 psi.
C/Kim spoke of his concerns regarding the amount
of pressure used to push the crude oil and asked
to look at preliminary designs to make sure that
seismic hazards have been properly addressed.
Mr. Ron Hen, President of Cajon Pipeline,
addressed the issue of the pressure involved and
the pipe used by stating that this type of oil
doesn't not "spout" during a leak but rather, it
becomes thick and has the consistency of asphalt.
M/Werner asked how long it takes the oil to get
from the beginning of the line to the end.
Mr. Hen stated that based on 150,000 barrels a day
capacity, it will take approximately 41 or 42
hours.
M/Werner asked if the system falls under PUC regu-
lations and if the City will have an opportunity
to conduct hearings on the EIR, EIS document.
Mr. Hen replied that the City would be a respond-
ing agency in the EIR, EIS process, but he was
unaware as to what extent.
MARCH 5, 1991 PAGE 7
In response to C/Nardella's question regarding
traffic disruption, Mr. Hen advised that the EIR
would address this issue.
M/Werner asked the ,CA/Arczynski to respond
regarding the PUC and what discretion the City
would have.
CA/Arczynski stated that two issues the City would
be involved in would be with Planning staff
regarding the environmental documentation process
and the franchise process.
With no further questions, M/Werner thanked Mr.
Hen, Mr. Stall and Mr. Jacquess for their
presentation.
OLD BUSINESS:
Ordinance 8A
CA/Arczynski stated that some time ago, this
(1990) Amending
Ordinance was brought before the Council for
Secs. 3203 &
First Reading. Following First Reading, the
3204, Title 26
Fire Department expressed concern about the
(Bldg. Code. of
usage of specific terminology. The changes
L.A. County,
are considered clerical in nature; however,
Pertaining to
he recommended that First Reading be conducted
Roof Covering
again.
Requirements
MPT/Forbing moved, C/Kim seconded to approve for
First Reading, by title only, and waive further
reading of Ordinance No. 8A (1990) entitled: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR AMENDING SECTIONS 3203 AND 3204 OF
TITLE 26 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CODE, AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED, PERTAINING TO ROOF
COVERING REQUIREMENTS. With the following Roll
Call vote, the motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS -
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS -
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS -
Kim, Nardella, Papen,
MPT/Forbing and M/Werner
None
None
Water PM/Daniel stated that the Walnut Valley Water
Conservation District mandated a 10% reduction in water usage
Efforts effective February 1, 1991. This reduction was
increased to 20% as of March 1, 1991 and effective
April 1, 1991, the reduction will increase to 30%.
The Parks Department has been practicing water
conservation for approximately one year as man-
dated by the City Council last summer by imple-
menting various irrigation practices to reduce
usage. Approximately 13.7% water has been saved
since last summer. The primary goal in maintain-
ing the 30% mandate will be to keep the trees
MARCH 5, 1991
Mission Statement
PUBLIC HEARING:
TTM 47722/
CUP/OT 89-338
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
PAGE 9
out at the end of March, first of April.
C/Nardella stated that the water conservation kits
are also available at the Diamond Bar Improvement
Association, located at 1081 S. Grand Ave. in the
Chamber of Commerce office.
Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest, stated that he
had seen water being wasted by the water district,
during a break of a fire hydrant. Also on the
water bill, it no longer says "Thank You for
conserving water."
Continued to April 16, 1991.
C/Nardella asked that the Council receive
additional information on the guidelines that GPAC
has been operating on to coordinate the Mission
Statement with the activities of GPAC and their
philosophies of the General Plan.
C/Nardella left the podium due to a potential
conflict of interest.
PD/DeStefano stated that he had met with the
Developer on this project and was informed that
there is the desire of the development team to
continue this matter to the meeting of March 19.
He further stated that a Public Hearing notice had
been published; however, the Notice was not sent
to the surrounding property owners as required.
This has been corrected and Notice was sent to
those surrounding the site.
Mr. Frank Piermarini, President of Piermarini
Homes, stated that he concurred with the Planning
Director's comments to continue the matter to
March 19, 1991.
M/Werner opened the Public Hearing.
With no testimony being offered, MPT/Forbing
moved, C/Papen seconded to continue the Public
Hearing to March 19, 1991. Motion carried
unanimously.
C/Papen announced that on March 9th, the Senate
Committee on Election Reapportionment is holding a
hearing in Los Angeles and is asking for input
from the community. A portion of northern Diamond
Bar is not in the same senatorial and assembly
district as the rest of the community. She
recommended that a letter be prepared and sub-
MARCH 5, 1991 PAGE 10
mitted to the Committee emphasizing that, in the
1990 reapportionment plan, that city jurisdiction
boundaries be utilized in the reapportionment
process.
M/Werner asked if C/Papen would be willing to
represent the Council at this hearing.
C/Papen stated that she would.
C/Nardella stated that he concurred with C/Papen's
recommendation and that it was his understanding
that with the new Supervisorial District, Diamond
Bar has two Supervisors as well.
Staff was requested to clarify who the Los Angeles
County Supervisor is for the Diamond Bar area.
C/Papen attendance at the hearing was affirmed by
all members of the Council.
C/Kim commended the members of the Planning
Commission for the thoroughness of their Minutes.
CLOSED SESSION: With no further business to conduct, M/Werner
recessed the meeting to Closed Session at 7:39
p.m. for discussion of the sale, lease, purchase
or exchange of Walnut Valley Unified School
District property known as "Site D."
ADJOURNMENT: M/Werner reconvened the meeting to Regular Session
at 9:02 p.m. and declared that the following
actions were taken during Closed Session:
ATTEST:
Mayor
(1) Council directed the initiation of litigation
by the City Attorney and special counsel
(Jennings, Engstrand & Henrikson) with the
County of Los Angeles pertaining to property
tax issues.
(2) Council directed the City Attorney to prepare
the necessary legal notices to consider
purchase of the Walnut Valley Water District
property.
There being no further business to report, M/
Werner adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Councilmembers Papen and Nardella
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, March 19, 1991
DATE: March 12, 1991
Attached is the Voucher Register dated March 19, 1991. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
it's entry on the Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated March 19, 1991 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
001 General Fund
138 LLAD 438 Fund
139 LLAD #39 Fund
141 LLAD #41 Fund
225 Grand Ave. Const. Fund
250 Capital Improvement Project Fd.
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
Linda G. Magn�isJon
Senior AccountaInt
Robert Van Nort
City Manager
AMOUNT
$171,382.94
310.38
6,055.00
7,315.76
2,078.19
3,208.50
$190,622.27
Phyllis E. Papen
Councilmember
Donald C. Nardell
Councilmember
**
City
of Diamond
Bar ***
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91
V
O U C H E R R
E 6 I S T E R
PAGE 1
DUE THRU.............03/19191
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* * PREPAID
ACCOUNT PRGJ.TX-NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECY
ARA/Cory Refreshment
Svcs
ARA
*001-4090-2325
2
16319A
63112
03/19
Meetingg Supplies
79.25
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
79.25
Angelus Pacific Co.
AnaelusPac
*001-4095-211?
2
10319A
03112
03119
Decals -City Logo
265.56
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
265.56
Area W
AreaE
*001-4030-2340
2
10319F
03114
03119
Conf Regstrtn-2 attendees
220.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
220.00
Assoc. of Local Transit
ALTA
*001-4230-2315
1
10319A
03/12
03/19
Membership -k. Frit.ai
45.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
45.00
Bill's Lock & Safe
BillsLock
*001-4310-2210
1
103194
03112
63/19 366445
Repair Flag Pole
62.00
*136-4536-2210
1
10319A
03112
23119 366866
Locks Dist 438
49.02
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
102.00
Burgess, Lynda
BurgessLyn
*001-4640-2330
2
10319F
03114
63/19
Reimb-City Clerks conince
58.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
58.00
Caere Corp.
CaereCorp
*001-4090-6237
1
10319A
03/12
03119
I
Upgrade OmniPace Software
79.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
79.88
California Contract
LCCA
061-4010-2325
4
103194
03/12
03119
COCA Mtg.-Kim 2/20191
25.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
25.00
Charles Hewitt
HewittC
*001-4210-4100
6
16319E
03112
03119
Seatac otg-03/04/91
180.60
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
106.02
+++ City of D i a m a n d Bar +++
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03/19/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Community Industries CommIndust
+001-4510-5500 1 10319A
Community Sweeping Servic ComDisposl
+001-4510-5501 2 10319A
Computerland of D. B. Cmptrland
+001-4090-6230 3 10319E
CopyMasters, The
+601-4090-2100
DB Country Club
+001-4019-2325
David Berry
+001-4210-4109
CopyMaster
3 10319A
DBCountryC
5 10319E
AerryD
5 10319E
Dept of Transportation DeptTrans
+001-4519-5507 1 10319A
Destefano,Jim Destefano
+001-4210-2325 2 10319A
+001-4210-2325 3 10319A
Diamond Bar Florist DBFlorist
+001-4095-1200 2 10319A
PAGE 2
+ + PREPAID + +
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
----------------------------
93/12
03119
Litter Abatement Feb.
506.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
506.00
03/12
03/19
23191
Street Sweeping 1/26-2123
10.697.19
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------'r
101697.19
03/12
03/19
627
Comouter equip 6 software
3,055.49
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ---------
3,055.49
03/12
03/19
049366
Maint. Copier Machine
262.2D
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
262.20
93!12
03/19
Qtrly Sheriff's mta.
355.06
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------'r
355.06
03/12
03/19
Seatac mtg-03/04191
100.90
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
100.00
03/12
03/19
116718
Signal 8 Lighting
614.75
I
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
614.75
03/12
03/19
Mtg Reimb.-Bldg Services
18.66
03/12
03/19
Mtg-City Attorney
39.51
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
58.17
03/12
03/19
Get Well-Benell
37.36
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ------->
37.36
*** City of D i a a a n d Bar ***
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E S I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03/19/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Diamond Bar Stationers DBStationr
*001-4090-1100 7 10319A
E. San Gab. Planning_ Comm ESSVPC
*001-4210-2325 4 10319E
Eastman Inc. Eastman
*001-4090-1100 9 10319A
*101-4090-1100 8 10319A
Ewing Irrigation Products 'Axing
{141-4541-5500 3 10319E
*001-4319-5300 2 10319A
Exxon
ExxonS
*001-4030-2310
2 10319A
*001-4090-2310
1 10319A
*001-4310-2310
2 10319A
Fred Pryor Seminars FredPry
*001-4050-2340 1 10319C
GTE California
GTE
*001-4090-2125
1 10319A
*001-4090-2125
2 10319A
*001-4230-2125
1 10319A
*001-4313-2125
1 10319A
Grothe, Jack GrotheJ
*001-4210-4100 1 10319C
PAGE 3
} PREPAID *
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
03/12
03/19
26107
File Folders/Pens
19.17
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
19.17
03/12
03/19
Meeting-De5tefano
11.75
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
11.75
03/12
03/19
7209706
Sheet Protectors
88.57
03112
03/19
7242849
Misc Office Supplies
171.84
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
260.41
03/12
03/19
Repair sprinklers I riser
235.80
03112
03/19
297409
Sprinklers/Tree Protector
207.46
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
443.26
03/12
03/19
Fuel -City Mnqr
26.70
03112
03/19
Fuel -City Council
17.50
03/12
03/19
Fuel -Parks
64.57
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------3
1D8.77
03;12
03/19
0845804
Reading Dynamics -Saul
125.00
I
TOTAL ELIE VENDOR --------)
125.00
03/12
03/19
Emergency Prep Phone
36.93
03/12
03/19
Phone -City Hall
1,096.25
03112
03/19
Engineering Phone
178.13
03/12
03/19
Phone -Heritage Park.
36.34
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
11347.65
03/12
03/19
Ping Comm Mtg 2/25/91
60.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
60.00
44* Cit•/ of D i a a o n d Dar * �
RUN TIME; 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E 6 I 6 T E R
DUE THRU.............03/19/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Hoffman Computer Systems Hoffman
4001-4098-6230 2 10319A
Home Depot HomeDeDot
4001-4310-1200 4 14319A
ICMA Retirement Trust
ICMA
40@1-4030-0080
2 10319D
*001-4030-9090
2 10319D
}001-4040-909@
2 103190
*001-4250-A090
2 1@319D
0501-4210-0090
210319D
*021-4230-4090
2 10319D
4021-4310-009@
2 101319D
ICMA Retirement Trust ICMA
*001-2110-1907 2 10319F
Inland Valley Div_ Bulletn IVDA
4001-4210-2115 1103199
*001-4040-2115 3 103198
*001-4210-2115 8 103i9D
Irwin M. Kaplan Kaplan
4001-4210-5212 1 10319E
Jennings Engstrand JenningsEn
}001-4020-4021 2 103199
L.A.County Public Works LACPebYk
4001-4510-55@7 2 103199
PAGE 4
4 4 PREPAID 4 {
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
----------------------
03/12
03/19
2047@3
Computer Equipment
71967.70
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------•:
1.961.12
03/12
03/19
586031
Operating Supplies
114.86
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
114.56
@31112
03/19
VanNort Def Comp Contrib
400.00
03/19/91 0000013124
03/12
03/19
Def Coag CDntributns
1,310.97
03/19/91 0000013124
03/12
93/19
Def Comp Contributions
678.33
93/19/91 0000013124
03/12
03/19
Def Comp Contributions
352.24
03/19/91 90@0013124
03/12
93/19
Def Comp Contributions
639.16
03/19/91 9009213124
03/12
03/19
Def Comp Contributions
+10.00
03/19/91 06@0813124
03112
03/19
Def Comp Contributions
555.51
03/191191 0020013124
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----:
4,346.21
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------•:
0.00
03/14
@3/0
Def Como Deductions
29.00
03/@5/91 0089013126
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----:
24.0b
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
03112
03/19
1166
Plna_giitle 22 Amendment
51.75
03/12
03119
7634
Pub Notice -Ord. 15 3 15A
54.0
01,112
03/19
7716
Ping -CUP 91-002 Cleaners
54.0?
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------';
159.75
@3112
03/19
Planning secs -February
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------j
5,008.00
@3/12
A3i19
Prop Tax Issues -Jan. 31
4.318.86
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
4,316.86
¢3/12
03119
91@0002616
Maint. Signals,Liyhts
5,105.42
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
5.744.44
ttt City of D i a a a n d Bar ++;
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03119/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PP,OJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/ND. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
League of Ca. Cities League
+001-4050-2335 2 103190
Leaque of Ca. Cities League
+821-4219-2325 5 10319D
Lewis Enoravino
+801-4995-2110
Mac Bride, Dexter
+091-4219-4198
Lewisengry
3 183199
MaCET ii'eD
2 183190
Markman Arc2vnski Hanson Markman Ari
+001-4020-4029 1 103190
+901-4020-4021 3 10319C
Mever, David MyerD
+891-4310-4100 3 183190
Miracle Recreation Equip. Miraclenec
+250-4319-6418 1 18319C
Myers, Elizabeth
+981-4210-4000
+001-4230-4000
0K-4319-4009
New Technologies
*001-4940-6230
Myer sE
2 19319C
2 103190
2 18319C
NewTechnol
1 18319C
PAGE t
+ + PREPAID + +
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
03112
03/19
1991 Appropriations Brksh
190.00 03/19/91 000901312E
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
198.08
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
8.88
93112
03119
Ping Inst. Coni 3120-22
518.00 03/19/91 0000013126
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----;>
518.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
0.90
03/12
03119 008258
Tile -P. Schabarum
15.98
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----------
15.96
03112
03/19
Plr;q Conn Mto 82/25/91
60.89
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
68.68
03/12
03/19
Leoal Sarvices Feb. 91
6.981.99
93/12
03/19
Spec Litigation Svc -Feb
1,7-97.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
61216.58
93/12
03/19
P3R Coag Mtqs 2/14-2/25
60.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
80.08
03112
I
03119 329613
Retention-Playond Equip
3,469.88
TOTAL DUE VENDOR ----------
3,480.03
03112
93119
Ping Cama 2/25/91
376.011
03/12
03/19
SEATAC Mtg 3/4/91
126.88
93/12
03/19
Parks b Rec Comm 2/26
162.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
666.86
03/12
93/19 13311
Computer Equipment
3,322.69
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
3,322.69
**{
City
of D i
a a o n d Bar ***
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91
V
0 U C
H E R R
E 6 I S T E R
PAGE E
DUE THRU.............03/19/91
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* * PREPAID * +
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO
---------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH P0.LINE/N0.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECi
Lam, Jack
LamJ
*001-4030-2335
2 103198
03/12
03119
Parking Fee Reimb.
8.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
8.00
Lambert; Jeffrey
Lambert
*001-4210-2325
6 103190
03/12
03/19
Congestion Mgt Seminar
40.00 03/19/91 000001312"r
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
40.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------*
0.00
Landscape West
LandscaoeW
*001-4311-5300
2 103198
03/12
03/19
Grow Park
942.33
*001-4313-5300
1 10319E
03112
43/19
Heritagae Park
11510.50
*001-4316-5300
1 l0i9B
03/12
03119
Maple Hill Park
1,779.91
*001-4319-5300
3 10319E
03/12
03/19
SylvanGlen Park
1,047.00
*001-4325-5300
1 1A319B
03112
93/19
Starshine Park
209.41
*001-4328-5300
1 10319E
03/12
03119
Susmitridge Park
628.16
*001-4331-5300
1 10319B
03112
03/19
Sycaaare Park
1,119.91
*001-4322-5300
1 103198
03112
03/19
003224
Mairt. Reacan Park
418.83
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
8,316.05
Landscape West
LandscaneW
*0014311-5300
3 10319E
03/12
03/19
003133
Repair Vandelism-Grow
357.15
*001-4319-5380
5 103198
03/12
03/19
003231
Fertilize -Peterson Park
450.00
*001-4310-5300
1 10319E
03112
03/19
003232
Clear Weeds and Trash
200.00
*901-4310-5300
2 10319E
03/12
03/19
003233
Weeds& Rack Removal
550.0
*001-4319-5300
6 i0319B
03112
93119
003234
Piantina Tams at Petersen
460.00
*001-4319-5300
4 10319B
03/12
03119
003235
Repair Water Break
898.00
TOTAL DIVE VENDOR -------->•
2,915.15
Landscape West
LandscaoeW
4141-4541-5500
2 103198
03/12
03/19
003225
Main". Dist 241
31300.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
3,300.00
Landscape West
LandscaaeW
*139-4539-5500
1 103198
03112
03119
003226
Maint. Dist 139
6,055.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
6,055.00
League of Ca. Cities
League
*001-4040-2330
1 10319E
03112
03/19
City Clrk Assoc. Reaistrn
190.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
190.00
ff* City of Diamond bar
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E G I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03119/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-NO BATCH PO.LINE/N0. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Ontario Chamber of Commer Ontario
*001-4030-2325 6 10319D
PERS Health Benefits PERSHealth
+001-2110-1003 3 10319D
*001-4090-0080 3 10319D
Pac Tel Cellular
f001-4030-2125
Pac Tel Paging
*001-4411-2130
PacTel
1 10319C
PacTelPag
3 10319C
Pacesetter Building Svcs Pacesetter
*001-4220-5201 1 10319C
*001-4220-5201 2 10319C
Parsons Brinckerhoff Parsons
*001-4230-2320 1 10319C
Payroll Transfer PayrollTr
*001-1020 2 10319D
Peterson, Dr. Craig PetersonC
*001-4210-4100 3 10319E
Plunk, Lydia E. P1unkL
*001-4310-4100 4 10319C
PAGE 7
PREPAID
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
--------------------------
03/12
03/19
RLVN-Legis Luncheon
15.04
03/19/91 0000013119
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
15.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
03/14
03119
Health benefits -March
5,309.22
03/19191 0000013123
03/14
03119
Admin chg-Feb
26.55
03/19191 0000013123
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
5,335.77
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.60
03/12
03/19
Cellular Phone-Cty Mgr
46.61
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------,
48.81
03112
03/19
Beener-Deputy Luter
12.01
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
12.01
03112
63/19 1020
Pian Check
14,496.76
03112
03/19 2662
Buildng Inspection
23,070.96
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
37,569.72
03112
03/19
Draft Report Soquel/Tonnr
75.08
I
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
75.00
03112
03119
PP Ending 2/22 :5
38,850.00
03/19/91 0000000005
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
38,850.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
0.00
03/12
03/19
Seatac mtg-3104191
100.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
100.00
03112
03/19
PIR Mtgs 2114-2128
80.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------->
80.00
{�
City
of
Diamond
Bar +{*
RUN TIME: 10:25
03/14/91
V
U U C H
E R R
E 6 I 5 T E R
PRbE
DUE THRU
.............03119/91
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
} PREPAID *
ACCOUNT PROJ.TI-NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=-------------
BATCH PO.LINEINO.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK.
Postage By Phone
- PostByPhon
*001-4090-2120
1
10319C
03112
03119
Postaqe
500.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
500.00
Public EMDI Retirement
PERS
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----}
0.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
Public Empl Retirement
PERS
*001-2110-1006
3
10319D
03/12
03119
Period Ending 2/22191
4,064.45 03/19/91 0000013121
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----::
4,064.45
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
R A D Blueprint
RIDBlue
*001-4230-2110
3
10319C
03112
03i19
42659
Blueline Copies
38.28
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
38.26
Radio Lab Comm
RadioLab
*001-4310-1200
5
10319C
03112
03/19
199754
Motorola Two Way Radids
424.94
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
424.94
Regents of Univ
of Calif.
Rep_entUCa
*001-4210-2330
1
10319E
03,112
03119
Seminars-92arcy
370.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
378.00
RonKranzer3Assoc
C.E. Inc
RKA
*001-4230-5221
7
10319E
03/12
03119
Engr-Drain transfers
4,539.00
*001-3461
1
10319E
03/12
03119
915707
Plan checking sycs
232.13
*001-4510-5502
1
10319E
03/12
03119
915713
Slurry seal engineering
21290.97
*001-4515-5221
1
10319E
03112
03/19
915714
Engr-6ldn Sprgs-Sunset Cr
243.00
*225-4230-5221
2
10319E
03/12
03119
915724
Engr Grand Ave @ Shotgun
2,076.19
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
9,383.29
Ruzicka, Joseph
T.
RuzickaJ
*001-4310-4102
5
10319C
03112
0311?
P$R Mtgs 2/14-2126
60.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------:
80.00
San Gabriel Vly
Tribune
SGVTribune
*001-4040-2115
4
10319E
03/12
03119
Puhi hrg-Ord 15 d 15A
35.60
*001-4210-2115
10
10319E
03112
03119
Pub hrg-Sign ordinance
33.90
*001-4210-2115
9
10319E
03/12
03119
7843
Pub hrg-CUP91-002
37.29
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
106.79
+++ City of Dia®and Bar *+*
RUN TIME: 10:25 03/14/91 V O U C H E R R E 6 I S T E R
DUE THRU.............03/19/91
VENDOR NAME VENDOR ID.
ACCOUNT PROJ.T1-NO BATCH PO.LINE/NO. ENTRY/DUE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Secretaray of State Secretary
*001-4030-2315 1 10319D 03/12 03/19
Security Pac Natl Bank SecurityPa
*001-4010-2325 6 10319E 03/12 03119
Sherry Schmidt SchmidtS
*001-4210-4100 4 10319E 03112 03112
Sir Speedy Sirspeedy
*001-4090-2110 1 110319E 03/12 03119
So. Ca. Joint Powers Ins. SCJ"r IA
+001-4030-2325 5 10319D 03/12 03119
So. Ca. Joint Powers Ins. SCJPIA
*001-2110-1004 1 10319D 03/12 03/19
*001-2110-1006 1 10319D 03/12 03/19
I
Southern Ca Gas Co SoCaGas
*001-4313-2126 2 10319E 03/12 03/19
Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison
*139-4538-2126 2 10319E 03/12 03/19
Southern Ca. Edison SoCaEdison
*001-4313-2126 1 10319E 03/12 03/19
PAGE 9
* * PREPAID
AMOUNT DAIE CHECK
----------- --------------
Notary Renewal -Nancy W.
20.00
03/19/91 0000013122
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---}
20.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
0.00
Meeting -Paden
17.53
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -----
17.53
Seatac eta -03104/g1
100.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
100.08
Postal cost. cards
142.15
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
142.15
Risk Mqr Roundtable
25.00
03/19/91 0000013118
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ----)
25.80
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
0.00
March Dental Prem
643.97
x3119/91 0000013125
March Vision
296.16
03/19/91 0000013125
TOTAL PREPAID AMOUNT ---->
934.13
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------5
0.02
00143132126
83.17
TOTAL DUE VENDOR -------)
93.17
Electric-LLAD 238
270.38
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------;
270.38
Electric -Heritage Pk
246.97
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i
246.97
*+
City
of
Diamond
Bar ***
RUN TILE: 10:25 83114;91
V
0 U C A
C D n E C
I C T E n
DfrDL 1L
DUE
THRU
.............03119/91
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
* PREPAID * +
ACCOUNT PR03.TX-NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
ENTRY/DUE
INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
*141-4541-2126
2
10319E
03!12
03/19
Electric-LLAD :41
571.43
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
511.46
Southern Ca. Edison
SoCaEdison
*001-4510-2126
4
1@319E
03/12
@3119
Electric -Traffic control
1,059.92
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------i
i.t59.92
Standard Insurance of
Ore
Standardln
*001-2110-1905
1
1@319E
?3112
;33/19
Mar
Mar life ins prei
333.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------:-
333.9
Stitt, Garretson 3.
StittS
001-4314-410@
2
10319C
03/12
03119
PIP, Mtas 2/14-2/28
10.80
TOTAL DU= VENDOR --------;
8v.0
Traffic Operations
TrafficO3
*001-4230-5221
6
10219E
093/12
03/19
91104
St. markina 8 sign instl
517.48
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------:
577.46
United Way
UnitedWay
*001-2110-1099
1
10319E
03112
03119
February contributions
56.66
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
05.66
Unocal
Unocal
*081-4210-2310
2
10319E
63/12
03/13
Fuel -Code enforcement
33.35
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------:
33.35
Van Nort, Robert L.
VanNortRob
*01-4030-2330
1
10319E
@3/12
03/19
Reimb.-Gonsalves mta
110.93
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------}
110.93
Walnut Vly Water Dist
WVWaterDis
*001-4322-2126
1
10319E
03/12
03/19
Water -Reagan Park
384.60
*001-4325-2126
1
10319E
03/12
03/19
Water-Starshine Park
279,31
TOTAL DUE VENDOR, --------}
663.90
PEEP
FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
REVENUE EXPENSE
---------------------
232.13 121,562.85
310.36
7,315.76
6,055.80
3,488.00
2,078.19
232.13 140,822.18
f+ City
of D
i a m D n d Bar*}
RUN TIME: 18:25 03/14/91
V U U C M E R
R E 6 I 5 T E R
FUND
SUMMARY
REPORT
DUE TNRU.............63)i9/91
DISBURSE
6/L
63E WILL
POST 6JE HAS POSTED
FUND
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
DIRECT PAY
REVENUE
EXPENSE REVENUE EXPENSE
0616eneral Fund
171,382.94
491557.95
136LLAD #38 Fund
310.38
141LLAD 841 Fund
7,315.76
139LLAD 439 Fund
6,055.08
25OC.I.P. Fund
3,488.98
2256rand Av Const Fu
2,078.19
TOTAL------------
------------
------------
----------------------------------
ALL FUNDS
190,622.27
49,567.96
PEEP
FUTURE TRANSACTIONS
REVENUE EXPENSE
---------------------
232.13 121,562.85
310.36
7,315.76
6,055.80
3,488.00
2,078.19
232.13 140,822.18
+
City of D i a a
o n d Bar ***
RUN TIME: 10:25 03,14/91
V 0 0 0 H E R R E
G I S T E R
PAGE 11
DUE THRU.............03119/91
VENDOR NAME
VENDOR ID.
+ PREPAID * }
ACCOUNT PROJ.TX-N0 BATCH PO.LINE/NO.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTRY/DUE INVOICE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT DATE CHECK
Walnut Vly Vater Dist
WVWaterDis
*141-4541-2126 3
10319E
03112 03119
Water-LLAD x41
3,208.50
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
3,208.50
Walnut Vly Water Dist
WVWaterDis
*001-4090-2126 2
10319E
03/12 03/19
Elec-communications site
10.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
10.00
Valnut/San Dimas Station
WSDStation
*001-4411-5400 1
10319E
03112 03/19
Team Building -Sheriff
186.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------)
186.00
Whelan, Stephen P.
WhelanSP
*001-4310-4100 1
10319C
03/12 03/19
P 6 R Comm 2114-2128
80.00
TOTAL DUE VENDOR --------
80.00
TOTAL PREPAID -----------)
54,350.56
TOTAL DUE ---------------)
136.211.11
TOTAL REPORT ------------)
190,622.21
CITY OF DIAMOM DAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 14, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Whelan called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. at the City Hall, 21660 East Copley Drive,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Meyer, Plunk, Stitt, Vice Chairman
Ruzicka and Chairman Whelan.
Also present were City Manager Robert Van Nort,
Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel and
Administrative Analyst Kellee Fritzal.
MATTER FROM THE Robert Van Nort, City Manager, reviewed two (2)
AUDIENCE: items that have been discussed by the Commission
over the course of several months in hopes of
clarifying some issues.
CM/Van Nort stated one of the items to be discussed
is the Parks and Recreation element. Currently the
City has appointed 30 citizens to develop a Draft
General Plan. Once the document is completed, it
will be forwarded to all the Commissions and then
to the City Council. It will be at that time that
the Commissions will have an opportunity to state
their input. Those recommendations will be
forwarded to the City Council.
CM/Van Nort stated the second item to be discussed
is the budget process. The City is faced with all
the revenues coming in either at, or about 950, of
what was projected. There is no guarantee that the
state will not cut further.
CM/Van Nort announced that there is a study session
on February 26, 1991, between 6:00 p.m. to 9:00
p.m., concerning the 1991 - 1992 budget. All the
Commissions are invited to attend and listen to a
presentation from the revenue standpoint. He
stated the three (3) primary items to be discussed
are: 1) Law Enforcement, 2) Parks and Recreation,
and 3) Traffic. He would like the Commission to
attend so that they can hear the Council's
philosophy and then proceed to work within it to
develop the Park and Recreation budget. If there
are concerns, direct them to the City Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Stitt requested the Minutes of January 24, 1991
be pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar.
February 14, 1991
NEW BUSINESS:
Page 2
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED to approve the Minutes of January 24,
1991.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Meyer, Plunk, VC/Ruzicka,
and C/Whelan
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Stitt
Presentation Cindy Morton, President of the Diamond Bar Girl's
from Girl's Softball, informed the Commission that sign ups are
Softball completed with 321 players of ages between 5 and 15
years old. The League would like to invite the
Commission to attend the opening ceremonies
February 23, 1991 at 11:00 a.m. The League
assessed the needs of Peterson Park, and have
decided to purchase 2 sets of bleachers to donate
to the City, if it meets the Commission's approval.
Chair/Whelan explained that at the dedication
ceremonies, Peterson Park had been designated as
the Girl's Softball home field. He clarified that
the League does not have an exclusive use to the
fields.
Cindy Morton replied that they are aware of this.
PMD/Daniel stated the matter should first be
brought to the attention of the City Attorney.
However, the bleachers to be purchased are of the
same quality, with all the safety devices, the City
would have purchased.
Motion was madelby C/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY that the City of Diamond
Bar, through the recommendation of the Parks and
Recreation Commission, accept the donation of
bleachers that have been purchased by the Diamond
Bar Girl's Softball for the price of $4,000.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
OLD BUSINESS:
Plunk, Meyer, Stitt, VC/
Ruzicka and C/Whelan
None
None
Recreation AA/Fritzal reported that staff is concerned with
Programming keeping the costs of the Recreation services under
$150,000. The City of Brea has reviewed the
contract and has submitted a proposal under
$150,000.
February 14, 1991
Page 3
C/Plunk requested a matrix that allows a comparison
of the actual costs of each program.
AA/Fritzal distributed the recreation proposals and
a letter sent to the City of Brea.
Chair/Whelan reminded the Commission that at the
Commission meeting of December 13, there was
discussion of putting together a building block
recreation program in regards to the City of Brea
proposal so programs can be reviewed and
prioritized in negotiations. He stated that he and
C/Plunk met with AA/Fritzal to discuss a recreation
program with the possibility of developing an in-
house program. Chair/Whelan handed out a chart for
the Commission to review. The criteria for the
program would be:
1. It should be self sustaining.
2. Classes must break even.
3. Non fee locations should be used first.
4. About 20 to 40 combination youth and adult
classes.
The Commission discussed the pros and cons of the
proposals received and the philosophy of
contracting services or providing them in-house.
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka,
and CARRIED to recommend to the City Council that
they negotiate a contract with the City of Brea to
provide recreational services which would be
subject to our budgetary limitations, our policy
direction, a flexible type of service, and would
include monitoring by the City.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Meyer, Stitt, VC/ Ruzicka
and C/Whelan
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Plunk
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
Update on PMD/Daniel reported, that both he and Sergeant Webb
Southern attended the event sponsored by the Southern
California California Girls at Sycamore Canyon Park and that
Girls no apparent illegal activity took place.
INFORMATION
ITEMS:
General Plan PMD/Janiel reported that CM/Van Nort's discussion
was intended to give the Commission an update on
the General Plan.
February 14, 1991 Page 4
Indoor/ PMD/Daniel submitted drawings and information for
Street Hockey an indoor/outdoor soccer facility. He stated this
Proposal was not intended to be a proposal, but rather
information on other viable avenues, should the
Commission care to continue further with the idea.
COMMISSIONER Chair/Whelan read a letter from Michael A. Nichole,
COMMENTS: Management Vice President of the Diamond Bar
Jaycees, in regards to supporting concerts in the
parks by contributing $1,000 to the first concert,
upon various stated conditions.
Chair/Whelan suggested filing the letter until such
time that the Commission is prepared to make
decisions regarding concerts in the parks.
PMD/Janiel stated a letter will be drafted
informing Mr. Nichole of the Commissions intent and
giving our thanks for their efforts, concerns, and
considerations.
C/Plunk thanked staff and Sergeant Webb for their
review of the Southern California Girls. She
thanked PMD/Janiel for the information concerning
the Larkstone and Pantera site. She noted the
brick dust at Sycamore Park appear to be more
compact than they ought to be.
PMD/Janiel stated staff will have the contractor
loosen it appropriately.
C/Plunk asked if there has been an improved design
for both the drainage and the spider apparatus at
Peterson Park.
PMD/Janiel stated there has not been any progress
made in regards to the drainage. Staff has been in
contact with the vendor and has made arrangements
to have someone come and replace the spider
apparatus.
C/Plunk requested that the Commission be included
in regards to the negotiations of the golf course.
Chair/Whelan inquired if the sports program at
Heritage Park has been billed yet.
AA/Fritzal replied that the School District Finance
Department will inform Walnut Valley staff.
Chair/Whelan requested the sub -committee reports be
included on the next agenda.
February 14, 1991 Page 5
STAFF COMMENTS: AA/Fritzal reported that the Second Anniversary
Celebration is scheduled for April 13, 1991 at the
Diamond Bar High School (DBHS). If any Commissioner
would like to become involved with the planning,
they are welcomed to join any of the subcommittees.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Stitt,
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
9:00 p.m. to the next regular meeting of February
28, 1991.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ CHART -PS JANIR.L
Charles Janiel, Secretary/Parks &
Recreation Commission
ATTEST:
/s/ PAT WHELAN
Pat Whelan, Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 28, 1991
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
MATTERS FROM THE
AUDIENCE:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Chairman Whelan called the meeting to order at 7:01
p.m. at the Diamond Bar Library, 1060 South Grand
Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
C/Stitt.
Commissioners Meyer, Plunk, Stitt, Vice Chairman
Ruzicka, and Chairman Whelan.
Also present were Administrative Analyst Kellee
Fritzal, Superintendent Don Hensley, and Contract
Secretary Liz Myers.
Kenny Plunk, 1522 Deerfoot, requested an
explanation for the termination of the after school
drop-in program at Heritage Park.
Chair/Whelan explained the low attendance, and the
limited budget. He stated the program will be
reconsidered in the future.
Wayne Johansson, 2601 Sutters Mill Drive, addressed
the lack of interest with Heritage Park program.
He suggested the City consider local neighborhood
advisors to oversee the recreation program.
C/Whelan explained eventually the City will run
it's own program. In the mean time, there will be
a full time City employee to oversee the recreation
program.
Chair/Whelan requested the Minutes of February 14,
1991 be pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Staff included on the Consent Calendar:
General Plan - March 5, 1991 - 5:30 p.m., 880 South
Walnut.i
Site "D" - March 4 and 11, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.,
Castle Rock Elementary School.
Motion was made by C/Meyer, seconded by VC/Ruzicka
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar as amended.
Minutes of Staff noted on page 1, of the Minutes of February
Feb. 14, 1991 141 1991, the Suite number should be amended to
100, and on page 2, second paragraph, the time
should be amended to 11:00 a.m.
Chair/Whelan requested the minutes be amended on
page 3, third paragraph to include the point that
it is in reference to the Minutes of December, 1990
in regards to the discussion of the approval of the
renegotiation with the City of Brea.
February 28, 1991 Page 2
C/Meyer requested the minutes be amended on page 4,
to correct the spelling to read "Nichole".
C/Plunk requested the minutes, under "Recreation
Programming", include references made to the
handout of recreation providers, the letter from
the City of Brea, and Chair/Whelan's draft of the
proposal included in the Commissioner's packet.
She stated under "Southern California Girls" there
should have been reference made to the special
responsibility of adults to children.
C/Plunk requested the minutes record enough detail
of the meetings so as to allow proper recollection
of points discussed.
VC/Ruzicka requested the Minutes of February 14,
1991 be returned to the Commission as so amended.
NEW BUSINESS:
Master Use Staff reported the master use agreement is being
Agreements drafted. The estimated total cost of the facility
usage should be $25,000 to $35,000.
Chair/Whelan inquired if the field usage charge
will be lowered.
Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Analyst, stated
staff will discuss the issue with the School
District.
Chair/Whelan inquired how maintenance salaries will
be determined based upon fee classes scheduled
during vacation periods.
AA/Fritzal stated there will be a flat rate salary
paid to custodians. She noted the master use
agreement will have a rate sheet determining all
the costs.
Site "D" staff reported the memorandum handed out was to
remind the Commission of the meeting planned for
March 4 and 11, 1991, at 7:00 p.m., to include
discussion on future land use and development of
Site "D".
Chair/Whelan inquired if there should be a
representative present for each Commission.
AA/Fritzal stated the staff will be present at the
March 4, 1991 meeting to be sure all comments are
received. The official City response will be
expressed at the meeting of March 11, 1991.
February 28, 1991
CORRESPONDENCE:
Page 3
C/Plunk asserted the land should be reserved for
park use.
C/Meyer stated open space, or a park use would be
best because it would establish a lower appraised
value of public use. The City needs to make a
commitment as to whether it is actually going to
pursue acquisition or not.
Diamond Bar Chair/Whelan presented the Commission the letter to
Jaycees be mailed to the Diamond Bar Jaycees addressed to
Mr. Nichole.
INFORMATION:
Monthly Park Don Hensley, Superintendent, presented the
Update Commission with the monthly report on the update of
the parks.
VC/Ruzicka stated that the report is an excellent
tool for informing the citizens. He suggested
putting the report into the Windmill, under a by
line of the Chairman of the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
Chair/Whelan concurred and requested input from the
Commission members in regards to the article.
S/Hensley noted that the vandalism is a costly
problem.
C/Stitt asked if there is contact with the local
police to patrol the area.
AA/Fritizal stated the City can prepare a press
release on vandalism problems in conjunction with
Deputy Luter of the Walnut Sheriff's station. This
information will be passed to Chair/Whelan.
C/Stitt recommended laying the costs of any
vandalism on the parents of the culprits.
COMMISSIONERS C/Plunk informed the Commission that Jeff Stevens
COMMENTS: invited them to the open ceremonies of the Diamond
Bar Little League from 12:00 to 1:00 p.m.. She
Commission suggested commending those that have shown
Comments exemplary leadership in improving recreation in
Diamond Bar.
C/Plunk stated there is a concern for the lack of
restroom doors in the girl's bathroom at Maple
Hill. She stated that many students are also
wondering what happened to the slide at Sycamore
February 28, 1991 Page 4
park.
C/Plunk would like to see the procedures concerning
the recreation program tightened to ensure that
documents arrive in a timely manner. She would
like the Commissioner's packets to be complete,
with the intent of keeping the Commission fully
informed to be able to operate as a professional
group.
Chair/Whelan informed the Commission of his meeting
with Jerry White, with the YMCA, in regards to the
lack of communication involved with the recreation
proposal, and the concern for the method of the
presentation of the RFP.
C/Plunk requested the phone at Heritage Park be
checked to ensure it is in working condition.
C/Stitt expressed concern in regards to the
California Girls at Sycamore Park. He suggested
banning swim suits at parks as a method of getting
around the whole issue.
AA/Fritzal stated there is a concern with becoming
too restrictive.
Chair/Whelan reminded staff of the request for the
sub -committee reports. He reminded the Commission
to inform the Chair of any items to be on the
agenda.
Chair/Whelan stated the Commission should be
involved in reviewing the recreation contract and
be able to give input when forming the program. He
requested staff send letters to all those who
submitted RFP's notifying them on the City's final
decision.
Chair/Whelan noted the bathrooms at Peterson Park
need to be partitioned in such a way to block the
visibility from the outside. He stated the Girls
Softball requested a key to be able to raise the
flag on weekends. They would also like an "as
built" for Peterson Park for the purpose of
determining the cost of installing lights.
Staff Comments AA/Fritzal informed the Commission that the City
Council has requested an wish list for items that
could be taken on by community groups as a fund
raising effort.
AA/Fritzal announced there was a meeting today at
3:30 p.m. with Brea to discuss the recreation
contract. The Commission will be kept informed.
February 28, 1991 Page 5
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Plunk
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
8:15 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ KELLE FRITZAL
Kellee Fritzal, Administrative Analyst
Parks and Recreation commission
Attest:
/s/ PAT WHELAN
Pat Whelan, Chairman
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 25, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Schey called the meeting to order at 7:03
p.m. in the Walnut Valley School District Board
Meeting Room, 880 South Lemon Street, Diamond Bar,
California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Grothe.
ROLL CALL: Commissioner Grothe, Commissioner Lin, Commissioner
MacBride, and Chairman Schey. Vice Chairman
Harmony was absent (excused).
Also present were Planning Director James
DeStefano, City Planner Irwin Kaplan, Assoc.
Planner Robert Searcy, Deputy City Attorney Bill
Curley, City Engineer Sid Mousavi, Planning
Technician Ann Lungu, and Contract Secretary Liz
Myers.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Motion was made by C/MacBride, seconded by C/Grothe
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Consent
Calendar and the Minutes of February 11, 1991.
OLD BUSINESS: Irwin Kaplan, City Planner, reported that the
Zoning Code Amendment NO. ZCA 91-1, presented in
ZCA 91-1 the packets, represents the concerns of the
Sign Ordinance Planning Commission reflected at the February 11,
1991 meeting.
Chair/Schey inquired if it would be legitimate to
remove an existing wall sign in lieu of requesting
a pole sign.
CP/Irwin Kaplan clarified that the wall sign would
become non -conforming and would have to be removed
unless the Planning Commission determines that such
existing signage can continue.
I
C/MacBride stated the proposal is consistent with
the ideas suggested at the last meeting.
Chair/Schey directed staff to prepare a resolution
of approval regarding ZCA 91-1 for the Planning
Commission's consideration at the meeting of March
11, 1991.
NEW BUSINESS: James DeStefano, Planning Director, reported that
the applicant was not in attendance to make the
Illumination presentation. Staff recommended postponing the
Presentation item, or receive and file the information without
the presentation.
February 25, 1991
Page 2
Chair/Schey stated that street signs are not
appropriate vehicles for advertising. The
Commissioners concurred.
Motion was made by Chair/Schey, seconded by
C/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to receive and
file the matter.
Review of Draft Upon the consensus of the Commission, discussion of
Development Code the matter was postponed until later in the
Chapters 1.1 evening.
& 1.11
PUBLIC HEARING Robert Searcy, Assoc. Planner, reported the request
ITEMS: is to construct a two (2) story structure totaling
8,352 square feet to provide additional classrooms
CUP 90-0130 for a parochial school grades K-8. The request
includes approval for the expansion of the
playground area.
Chair/Schey inquired if the school would still be
within the permitted student capacity.
AP/Searcy explained the new building would allow
housing for the students currently enrolled. He
pointed out that there will be a slight addition to
the northern elevation on the playground area.
C/MacBride inquired if the expansion would preclude
the use of the trailers.
AP/Searcy responded that the trailers would be
removed once the building is completed.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Gary Stuve, member of Mount Calvary, explained the
existing trailers will be removed and that the
school will be operating with the same number of
students as presently. The expansion will allow
for some area of growth and permit applicants on
the waiting list to attend the school.
C/Grothe commented that the site on Golden Springs
needs improved landscaping and maintenance. He
requested the church make some form of change in
regards to curb appeal.
C/Lin inquired if there will be additional traffic
problems with the expansion.
Gary Stuve stated there is no problem with the
traffic to his understanding. The entrance will be
made one way to make it less confusing.
February 25, 1991
Page 3
Chair/Schey asked if the categorical exemptions
will still apply to the expansion of the school
population.
Bill Curley, Deputy City Attorney, replied that
both elements have been considered and still follow
within the parameters.
Pastor Dennis Stuve, of Mount Calvary, stated the
landscaping plans in process will include curb
appeal landscaping as well.
William McNeal, residing adjacent to the proposed
building, concurred that the existing church
grounds are in need of additional landscaping. He
stated the planned expansion will block the view of
the existing residents. He inquired where the air
conditioning units will be placed and on which side
of the building will the parking be located. He
commented that the school is presently big enough.
Paul Lowd, residing at 23309 E. Gold Rush, is also
concerned with the height of the proposed building,
and the location of the air conditioning. He
stated that the school presently operates on
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 12:00. He is concerned the
additional students will create more disturbing
noises. He stated it was his impression that the
school was limited to operate only Monday through
Friday.
Chair/Schey asked staff to respond to the concerns.
AP/Searcy replied there is no additional parking
provided in the plans because there is already
available parking. He explained the proposed
building will be further away from the residents
than the existing building. The mechanical
equipment will be located on the exterior of the
main structure. The school function is prohibited
from operating 10:00 p.m. through 8:00 a.m., and
the athletic field should not be utilized between
dusk and 8:30 a.m. Monday through Friday, and dusk
to 10:00 a.m., Saturday and Sunday.
Chair/Schey inquired if the building is the same
height as the gymnasium.
AP/Searcy replied that the gymnasium is two (2)
feet higher with the grade sloping towards Golden
Springs.
Mr. McNeal indicated on the site plan where the
existing homes are located in respect to the
church. He reiterated that the new homes will be
February 25, 1991
Page 4
higher than the existing homes.
Chair/Schey stated he would like further
information before making a decision on the matter.
The points of concern are the potential impact of
the elevation difference, and the general
maintenance condition of the site. He directed
staff to visit the residents homes and take
pictures of the site, obtain more information in
regards to grading, and verify that the existing
landscaping condition is being observed.
Motion was made by C/MacBride, seconded by C/Grothe
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter to
the next meeting of March 11, 1991 to include the
outlined information directed to staff.
DA 91-2 Ann Lundu, Planning Technician, reported that the
Car Wash request is for a development agreement to develop
the property for the following uses: self-service
gasoline sale, automated car wash, automotive
detail facility with offices, and a restaurant.
Staff recommended approval of the negative
declaration with the listed conditions.
Chair/Schey noted it was indicated by the applicant
that the cumulative traffic is expected to result
in an unacceptable level of service at Golden
Springs and Grand Avenue. He inquired what are the
improvements proposed by the traffic study.
Sid Mousavi, City Engineer, stated the information
provided by the applicant was not acceptable.
Staff has requested additional reports and studies.
There is not adequate traffic impact information.
Chair/Schey asked if the main entrance lines up
with anything on the other side.
CE/Mousavi stated the main entrance lines up with
the left turn pocket already in existence. There
is also a median break in existence. Staff is
questioning the right turn coming out of the center
because it may not be designed with an adequate
turning radius for trucks.
C/Lin inquired why there is only one entrance.
CE/Mousavi stated the egress and ingress should be
limited to one access to the site to reduce the
possibility of hazards of the street.
The Public Hearing was declared closed.
Gary Clapp, 2344 Golden Springs, displayed the map
February 25, 1991
Page 5
and indicated the location of the proposed project.
He stated the location of the driveway is adequate
for visibility and speed. The traffic will be
slowed because the signals are set to trigger more
frequently with the onset of more traffic.
Jay Nelson, Traffic Engineer, stated the increment
of the project has been identified before the
intersection and was found to be insignificant. He
concurred that the driveways need to provide a
larger radius than proposed to provide adequate
ingress and egress. He stated there is a stopping
distance of 700 feet which is adequate for the
posted speed limit. The improvements done at Grand
and Golden Springs were previously identified by
L.A. County, in a traffic study done approximately
a year ago, as feasible improvements. If the City
feels otherwise, there are a few alternatives.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Rita Shaw, resident of the area, stated she in
favor of the project because it will bring revenue
and the City needs a local car wash.
Mike Citel, President of Champion Restaurant,
stated he plans on building a restaurant in the
general area and a car wash would be beneficial.
MaryLou Street, a business owner in Diamond Bar,
stated the vacant land is an eyesore. The
additional revenue for the City is beneficial.
Frank Schabarum, realtor on the project, stated the
pad is expansive and would be hard to utilize by
restaurant owners, unless done so by the stated
proposdl. The project will be a good sales
generator.
Joe McManus stated the area is best suited for a
car wash.
Ben Reiling, with Zellman Development Co, 1661
Hanover, City of Industry, was concerned about
controlling the traffic for the five (5) different
uses on the 106 square foot site.
Jack Leaso, Director of Administrative Services for
South Coast Air Quality Management, was concerned
the project would obstruct the view and recommended
reducing the stated height. He suggested moving
the car wash building up against and parallel to
Golden Springs, which would solve the circulation
problem. There needs to be internal circulation.
He stated the style of architecture is not keeping
February 25, 1991 Page 6
with the neighbors.
Chair/Schey inquired as to the status of the
approved car wash at the Honda location.
PD/DeStefano stated there has been no permits
issued, nor plans for a plan check submitted.
Chair/Schey inquired which zones are capable of
accommodating a car wash through either right or
Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
AP/Searcy stated zone C-1 and C-2 allow coin
operated car washes, and C-3 allow automated
car washes.
Chair/Schey stated he is bothered by the use of a
development agreement to provide a use not
permitted in the zone.
DCA/Curley explained the development agreement does
provide a vehicle by which uses otherwise
prohibited can be allowed it. It is a legitimate,
permissible use as established here.
C/MacBride stated he visited the parcel and noted
the key question is that of traffic and safety. It
was difficult to pull off and park, as well as
getting back into the traffic stream. He would
like to see the necessary data imperative to make a
decision. He had not considered the aspect of view
impairment from the project and is sensitive to the
concern. He noted the tudor architecture design is
confusing with the existing neighbors.
C/Lin affirmed the need for a more detailed traffic
report. She inquired if the future restaurants
egress and ingress will tie with the driveways.
Mr. Clapp responded that the restaurants egress and
ingress will primarily be at the main driveway.
C/Grothe stated the proposal has too many large
holes at the current time, the architectural
designs of the different projects needs to match
one another, need a submittal of a sign program,
and the traffic issues need to be reviewed further.
Chair/Schey reiterated his concern that a
development agreement is more of an ancillary or
accessory use to a project to permit uses otherwise
not permitted. He recommended denial and suggested
the applicant go through a proper process of a zone
change, and then the appropriate development
processes.
February 25, 1991
Page 7
DCA/Curley stated that if a zone change is
permitted, then other uses that would otherwise not
be permitted, would be allowed in. The method
proposed gives moderate control.
Chair/Schey contended the existing zoning
designation states the uses, and those uses should
be the ones that govern the development of the
site, unless the zone is changed.
C/Grothe recommended giving the applicant guidance
as to the process to follow for an avenue to
receive acceptability of the project.
CP/Kaplan suggested keeping the discussion narrowly
focused and separate it from the policy question as
to the use of a development agreement.
Mr. Clapp emphasized that the development agreement
process suggested by staff seems a just and fair
way to proceed with the project.
Mr. Williams requested guidance from the Commission
as to the direction to proceed. Many of the
concerns stated are answered within the packet
submitted.
Motion was made by C/Grothe, seconded by C/MacBride
and CARRIED to continue the matter to the meeting
of March 25, 1991 pending the resolution of the
mitigation measures that would be required as part
of the mitigated negative declaration for the
approval of the development agreement.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Grothe, MacBride, and Lin
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: C/Schey
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
CUP 1634-1 PD/DeStefano suggested the matter be continued to
the meeting of March 11, 1991.
The Public Hearing was declared open and upon
receiving no comment, was declared closed.
Motion was made by C/Grothe, seconded by C/MacBride
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue the matter to
the March 11, 1991 meeting.
Review Draft PD/DeStefano requested postponement of the
Development Code discussion of the Administration Chapter 1.1 until
Chapt. 1.1 & 1.11 the next meeting.
Dan Dunham, a principal with the Planning Network,
outlined some of the significant components of the
code. He stated the Planning Network was asked
specifically to:
1. Prepare a document that organizes the various
February 25, 1991 Page 8
sections into a logical format.
2. Eliminate the non -relevant portions of the
code.
3. Establish criteria applicable to Diamond Bar.
4. Incorporate the informal ongoing decision
making process.
5. Incorporate the sign ordinance.
6. Prepare a development code which reflects the
policies and the goals of the general plan and
establish a balance between the two documents.
Mr. Dunham stated five (5) documents were reviewed
from different cities, which included Moreno
Valley, Pasadena, Santa Monica, Irvine, and Buena
Park, to establish a basis for the development
code.
CP/Kaplan suggested staff give a presentation to
the Commission to report on the implications of
each section of the document.
Chair/Schey stated definitions could be best
handled by the staff and any item out of the
ordinary can be pointed out. Items like the Design
Review would need a more detailed review. The
zoning chapters would have to be looked at
anecdotedly to get a grasp of the implications.
PD/DeStefano suggested continuing the discussion at
a time when the Commissioners have the document
before them. To help staff prepare for the next
meeting, it would be helpful if the Commission
describes more fully the type of process they wish
to go through on a chapter by chapter basis.
CE/Mousavi suggested the Commission mark off
individual sections that cause concern. During the
meeting, the document can be reviewed page by page
at those points of concern.
Chair/Schey requested staff also flag any issues
the Commission should be particularly cognizant of,
in advance to the discussion scheduled.
PD/DeStefano clarified that the evaluation will be
done in the form of a verbal presentation.
Chair/Schey requested a table of contents for the
entire document be given at the next meeting.
Chair/Schey, with the consensus of the Commission,
directed staff that the meeting of March 11, 1991
will convene at 7:00 p.m., to include discussion of
chapters 1.1 and 1.11., and the meeting of March
25, 1991 will convene 6:30 p.m., to be properly
February 25, 1991 Page 9
notified.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: PD/DeStefano announced there will be a public
meeting held by the Walnut Unified School District
on March 4, 1991 and March 11, 1991 at Castle Rock
Elementary School in regards to the development of
Site "D" (Brea Canyon and Diamond Bar Blvd.). The
purpose of the meeting is to gather public input on
the housing project proposed by the District, and
the desirability of developing the site into a
community park. The meetings will begin at 7:00
p.m.
PD/DeStefano announced that the City Council will
receive a presentation by Lloyd Zola, from the
Planning Network, on the current status of the
general plan at the regular Council meeting of
March 5, 1991. All Commissions and committees are
invited to attend.
Chair/Schey inquired as to the proper process to be
able to attend the conference of the Annual League
of California Cities.
PD/DeStefano recommended notifying staff within the
next few working days to assure a reservation with
the hotel. The conference is scheduled for
Wednesday, March 20, 1991 through Friday, March 22,
1991.
C/Grothe inquired if there has been any news in
regards to the Pomona School district.
PD/DeStefano stated the Pomona School District is
undergoing an evaluation process to determine the
location of a new Diamond Bar High School. The
State ils insisting the funds allocated for a study
be used quickly to determine a site, as well as the
development of the site. They are seeking
community input.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/Grothe, seconded by C/MacBride
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
10:45 p.m.
/s/ David Schey
David Schey
Chairman
Attest:
/s/ James DeStefano
James DeStefano
Secretary/Planning Commission
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE
SIGNIFICANT ECOLOGICAL AREA TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY S, 1991
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson/ Petersen called the meeting to order at
3:12 p.m. at the Community Room, 1061 South Grand
Ave., Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by
ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairperson Schmidt.
ROLL CALL: Committee Members: Dr. David Berry, Charles
Hewitt, Vice Chairperson Sherry
Schmidt and Chairperson Craig
Petersen.
Also present were Planning Director James
DeStefano, Assoc. Planner Robert Searcy, City
Planner Irwin Kaplan, and Contract Secretary liz
Myers.
CONSENT CALENDAR: CM/Hewitt requested the Minutes of December 3, 1990
be amended on page 5, item #1, to read
"xerioscape".
CM/Berry requested the Minutes of December 3, 1990
be amended on page 6, item #4, to read "tuff" and
further down the paragraph to read "dehydrating the
tuff.".
Motion was made by CM/Hewitt, seconded by CM/Berry
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to approve the Minutes of
December 3, 1990 as amended and the Minutes of
January 18, 1991.
OLD BUSINESS: Dr. King, of D.L. King Associates, representing
Diamond Bar Associates, Inc. (DBA), presented
Review of information concerning the mitigation and
TTM 47850,47851, responses, of the SEATAC, in regards to TTM 47850,
and 48407 47851, and 48407, which are wholly or partially
located within SEA #15. The mitigation measures of
the original design presented were with the
expectation that any changes would not be
substantial in terms of the differences in the
amount of grading, landscaping, or hydrological
change. Any modifications necessary could be made
in the final design.
Donna West, of D.L. King Associates, stated the
information prepared by the Development Team and
submitted to the SEATAC included the initial report
with an addendum and a table of contents, a
complete revision of the Offsite Drainage Section,
the amended version of the Immediate Visual
February 4, 1991 Page 2
Impacts, a reference on Neighborhood Education to
the CC&R"s, updated information concerning
Landscaping and Tree Replacements, and a layout for
the parameters of the regional study, including
information on funding and reimbursement.
Dr. King displayed a map representing the original
submitted tract. The drawings demonstrate the
hydrology of the proposed tract site, before and
after development. He explained that the main blue
line stream channel, based on a 25 year design
storm, show a current flow of 149.5 cubic feet per
second (CFS) on the easterly channel as it leaves
the site, and 171.9 CFS on the westerly channel as
it leaves the site. After development, the
easterly blue line stream changes from 149.5 CFS to
147.6 CFS. The westerly blue line stream, of the
westerly tract, changes from 171.9 CFS to 175.6
CFS. Dr. King noted that the change in the amount
of flow on the westerly tract, is not significant
enough to require mitigation. The reason the
numbers are similar after development, despite the
increase in impervious structures, is because
essentially after development, in some areas, there
is slightly more area tributary to one side than to
another. The amount of water flowing in one
direction has been reduced because the acreage
supplying water to that direction has been slightly
reduced. The other side should increase in volume,
but the Q factor (the amount of water per unit of
time) is not going to be significantly different,
as the water will collect for a longer period of
time before it will run off, once the hillside is
flattened for the pads.
Dr. King stated there is a similar situation on the
easterly side. There is one place that does
require mitigation. The easterly stream changes
from 99.1 CFS to 103 CFS after development, which
is not significant enough to require mitigation.
However, the westerly stream changes from 216.9.to
230.8 CFS after development. This change, as well
as the change in the flow of water, requires
mitigation. The storm drains are collecting water
which is concentrated in the pipes and develops a
"head", which is an amount of water pressure behind
it. The concentrated flow is corrosive, so the
velocity of the water flow must be reduced by
piling rocks up in front of it. The volume of
water would be mitigated by a limited or short term
"ponding". The intent of ponding is to reduce the
flow of water to approximate the water flowing
before development. The impact of the stream would
then be negligible.
February 4, 1991
Page 3
Chair Petersen inquired if the determination for
the Q factor is standardized.
Pete Pfieler, of Pfieler Associates Engineer,
explained that the Los Angeles County developed
tables tabulating the entire County by geographic
area, and has established hydrological charts
indicating the frequency of storms, and charts
indicating the coefficient of runoff in
relationship to the acreage.
Chair/Petersen asked how much Q factor becomes
significant.
Pete Pfieler stated it depends upon the velocity of
the water and it's erosive characteristics. The Q
factor is the amount of water flowing over a unit
of time. It is not the volume of water as much as
the velocity. The Q has been established in the
before condition. Given the same slope, if the
amount of Q is increased, the velocity is also
increased. There is an energy dissipator at the
end of the pipe which stores water in a retention
basin. The lesser amount, or the original amount,
will flow out, and the remainder will sit awhile
and eventually be absorbed. A 15 feet/second'
is somewhat erosive but a 10 feet/second is not
considered bad.
Chair/Petersen inquired how children will be kept
out of the energy dissipator.
Pete Pfieler explained the pipe size is
approximately 24 inches and the energy dissipator,
which is relative to the pipe size, will not be
that big. If the retention area is over 18 inches
deep, then it has to be fenced. The retention area
will be less than 18 inches. The final design will
be checked by the City of Diamond Bar.
Chair/Petersen asked what will be done with the
runoff containing toxic substances.
Dr. King explained the developer is limited with
what can be done in regards to this situation. The
runoff containing debris will be collected at the
basin. It is standard to have the homeowners
association responsible for cleaning out the basin
on a regular basis.
Chair/Petersen, in reference to Offsite Drainage
Impacts on page 5, bottom paragraph, in the
mitigation supplement, asked what are the specific
impacts being referred to.
.•
February 4, 1991
Page 4
Dr. King explained there are potential soil
problems that need to be taken into account. One
of the problems is in terms of the corrosivity of
the water. If the corrosive water is not
mitigated, it will dig it's own channel. Another
problem refers to the grading and recompaction of
the colluvium, which has the structural stability
of peanut butter, and must be mitigated in order to
put something on top of it. There is a potential
for slippage if water soaks into poor soil over
time. It is acknowledged that there are existing
problems and these are addressed in the specific
mitigation. There will be no impact on the SEA
with the particular mitigation stated.
VC/Schmidt stated that even with the mitigation,
there will be water flowing down at the wrong time
of year. The riparian system will be altered by
the invasion of species because it is wet at the
time of year it is not supposed to be wet. It is
not the amount of water but the timing of the flow.
It will change the characteristics of what is
considered a natural riparian area.
Dr. King acknowledged the concern and stated his
intentions of conferring with Craig Weber to come
up with a statement acknowledging that fact. He
suggested the volume of water could perhaps be
ponded on site rather than letting it enter the
SEA.
Chair/Petersen, referring to page 6, third
paragraph, fifth line from bottom, asked for
clarification as to the location, on the map, of
the tributaries.
Dr. King explained that before development, the
flow is perpendicular to the slope downhill. After
development, there are areas of pads that are going
to flow through the street. The total amount of
water is not changing, but the location of the
where it is coming into the channel, is. He
indicated the new tributary has added 12.3 CFS. It
is a potential problem if it is not mitigated.
However, it is mitigated by reducing the kinetic
energy in the water so it is not flowing so fast.
The amount of flow per unit of time is about the
same after development as it would before
development.
Chair/Petersen inquired who monitors the final
grading plans.
Dr. King responded that the City reviews the final
grading plans. He explained that, to his
February 4, 1991 Page 5
knowledge, SEATAC would give their recommendation
on the concepts and the City would do the final
monitoring.
Chair/Petersen, referring to page 20, asked the
manner in which the 32 fifteen (15) gallon trees
would be dispersed.
Craig Weber responded the intent is to reconstruct
the natural system based on observation on site.
It will be physically located on plan as they have
been distributed in nature.
Chair/Petersen wondered about the availability of
the Black Walnut trees.
Craig Weber replied that many of the materials may
be contract grown to ensure availability and size
of the species.
NEW BUSINESS: Irwin Kaplan, City Planner, stated, at the last
meeting, a proposal was requested that would tie in
Ecological Concept the efforts of the SEATAC together with the overall
Study planning and issues of the Canyon as a whole.
Hopefully, the Committee is reasonably comfortable
dealing with the issues of the site itself. He
inquired of the Committee Members if they are at a
point where the activities of the SEATAC can begin
to wrap up and tie the elements together. He
received an affirmation response from the members.
Irwin Kaplan distributed copies of the "Ecological
Concept Plan Proposal for Tonner Canyon". He
reminded The Committee that the assignment was to
develop a concept plan for the Canyon broad enough
to touch all the issues, and yet refined enough to
see how the various developments would fit into it.
The end proftct desired is an overview of the types
of intensity of development that could take place
within the various parts of the canyon, and how
this particular development would fit into it. He
reviewed the nine (9) point program suggested in
the concept plan proposal:
1. Gather existing scientific study of the biota
of Tonner Canyon.
2. Gather and summarize all relevant drafts and
final EIR's.
3. Meet with the Committee members.
4. Make site visits.
5. Prepare a map showing the geological and
ecological constraints of the Canyon.
6. Map the existing proposed land uses that show
what the area is capable of absorbing, as well
as what is being proposed.
7. Take the existing development proposal as a
reference point, and prepare a map with
February 4, 1991 Page 6
specific recommendations for standards on the
location of types and intensity of development
grading rules, in order to preserve the
aesthetics and ecological resources of the
Canyon.
8. Compile the information with the use of
graphics.
9. Recognize the necessity of completing the
study as quickly as possible.
Irwin Kaplan indicated that the consultants are
prepared to do the study in twenty (20) days. The
final product has been estimated to cost $24,000.
The area of study would go beyond the corporate
boundaries of the Canyon. The next step, upon the
approval of the Committee, is to bring it to the
Planning Commission for their blessing.
VC/Schmidt suggested the study should incorporate
all three (3) Counties involved, and possibly look
at land acquisition for part of the State Park.
Irwin Kaplan stated, at this point, the intent is
to develop a context for SEATAC so when SEATAC
works with very specific projects, it will fit into
a larger scheme, when completed.
Cecil Mills, of Diamond Bar Associates, Inc.,
stated he has some serious concerns about item #7
of the concept plan. To have an outside consultant
address all these issues, at this time, in the
language that's contained within the paragraph,
appears to be their presumption that it is an
aggregation of the responsibilities of the SEATAC,
Planning Commission, the City, and all the
developers to work these matters out through the
existing public circumstances. It would seem it
ought to work with some guidance and input from
all of these experts. He suggested including some
possible correction, or limiting action, within the
confines of that paragraph. He stated their
willingness, under the appropriate circumstances,
to fund the matter subject to being able to resolve
what is considered to be a major concern.
Irwin Kaplan stated the key is to come up with a
concept that is useable and balances the ecological
objectives, while maintaining the integrity of the
Canyon with development objectives for all the
activities that will take place. Beyond that, it
is not known how closely the concept can be
defined.
Mr. Mills offered his representation to fund the
study, subject to correction of the language of
February 4, 1991
Page s
given to Mr. Kaplan, then Mr. Kaplan, in his
opinion, would be in a better position to request a
proposal. He offered his cooperation with the
Committee and the City to explore and expedite the
study.
CM/Berry stated it was his understanding that what
was needed was a regional study, and the use of
outside consultants would be useful to obtain a
larger, regional ecological survey. The issue of
SEA 15 appears to be pretty much settled. The use
of the outside consultants would be better served
in this larger County function, rather than on the
SEA 15. If we don't address the issue on a larger
concept, each additional SEA would be reviewed
separately and piece mealed.
Irwin Kaplan stated if the members of the SEATAC
would write down their thoughts, he would put them
all together.
Mr. Mills stated the $24,000 is available subject
to receiving input from the members of the SEATAC
and the drafting of the proposal.
Irwin Kaplan stated it is appropriate for the
SEATAC members to begin thinking about what will be
in their final report, including how it relates to
the project, and what is the product of their
effort.
CM/Hewitt inquired if they should assume that the
amended information given in the report is not able
to be mitigated at this point.
Irwin Kaplan stated that nothing is concrete. The
SEATAC's input is required and the Commission will
consider all points given.
CM/Berry inquired if it will be necessary for the
SEATAC to review the final detailed information on
grading issues.
Irwin Kaplan responded that, at this point, it may
not be necessary, as long as the spirit of their
recommendations is maintained.
James DeStefano noted that at some point down the
road, the SEATAC would need to see the results of
their actions and how the project has developed.
Mr. Mills stated that it would seem appropriate for
the City to adopt regulations that permitted
further review at the request of the Planning
February 4, 1991 Page 7
item #7, and then plans can be made to move
forward.
Dr. Al LaPeter, of Diamond Bar Associates, Inc.,
inquired if SEATAC would be unable to give their
answer until the study is completed.
Irwin Kaplan replied that SEATAC should have enough
information about the site and the offsite impact
so they are not dependent upon any other studies.
The hope is that the SEATAC recommendations and the
results of the Ecological concept would come
together at the same time.
Al LaPeter asked the Committee if they will want to
see the completed study before they make a
decision.
VC/Schmidt responded that the idea of the study was
to avoid piece-mealing the Canyon. The project
before the SEATAC is a small chunk of development,
but lots of small chunks will create a major impact
if piece-mealed one chunk at a time. The whole
idea of the proposal was to get the big picture of
the area in relationship to what is existing. We
should at least get the three (3) Counties
coordinated to recognize that this is a significant
ecological piece of land that will be gone if it is
not preserved now. The connection between Chino
Hills State Park, Carbon Canyon, and the wildlife
corridor must be recognized. At least coordinate
the three (3) Counties with the purpose, in the
future, of making some sort of land acquisition so
part of this canyon will be saved.
Chair/Petersen, referring to Dr. King's statement
on page 29, the second paragraph, stated it was his
impression that there was to be a bigger picture.
He clarified that the proposal- deals with SEA 15
only. He was under the impression it was to be in
a larger scope with an integrated connection of the
other areas.
Bernie Mazur, of Diamond Bar Associates, Inc.,
suggested what may be required is some additional
input from the members of SEATAC as to how they
envision this study.
CM/Hewitt concurred that a larger scope must be
looked at.
Mr. Mills suggested the study be broader. This
needs to be done in stages with input from the
members of the SEATAC as to what items need to be
explored. If the concerns could be summarized and
February 4, 1991 Page 8
given to Mr. Kaplan, then Mr. Kaplan, in his
opinion, would be in a better position to request a
proposal. He offered his cooperation with the
Committee and the City to explore and expedite the
study.
CM/Berry stated it was his understanding that what
was needed was a regional study, and the use of
outside consultants would be useful to obtain a
larger, regional ecological survey. The issue of
SEA 15 appears to be pretty much settled. The use
of the outside consultants would be better served
in this larger County function, rather than on the
SEA 15. If we don't address the issue on a larger
concept, each additional SEA would be reviewed
separately and piece mealed.
Irwin Kaplan stated if the members of the SEATAC
would write down their thoughts, he would put them
all together.
Mr. Mills stated the $24,000 is available subject
to receiving input from the members of the SEATAC
and the drafting of the proposal.
Irwin Kaplan stated it is appropriate for the
SEATAC members to begin thinking about what will be
in their final report, including how it relates to
the project, and what is the product of their
effort.
CM/Hewitt inquired if they should assume that the
amended information given in the report is not able
to be mitigated at this point.
Irwin Kaplan stated that nothing is concrete. The
SEATAC's input is required and the Commission will
consider all points given.
CM/Berry inquired if it will be necessary for the
SEATAC to review the final detailed information on
grading issues.
Irwin Kaplan responded that, at this point, it may
not be necessary, as long as the spirit of their
recommendations is maintained.
James DeStefano noted that at some point down the
road, the SEATAC would need to see the results of
their actions and how the project has developed.
Mr. Mills stated that it would seem appropriate for
the City to adopt regulations that permitted
further review at the request of the Planning
February 4, 1991
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
Page 9
Commission. If the City has a way to revive the
SEATAC's involvement in the project, it satisfies
both our needs. He stated his willingness to have
it subjected to this condition.
James DeStefano stated that this is a policy issue
for the City Council to decide.
Bernie Mazur suggested the concerns of SEATAC
should evolve as a condition of approval. The
appropriate time for their review is at the time
the conditions of approval are propagated.
Chair/Petersen announced the next meeting is on
February 25, 1991, at 3:00 p.m. at the Community
Room.
Motion was made by CM/Hewitt, seconded by CM/Berry
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at
4:50 p.m.
Craig Pete en
Chairman
Attest:
Ja s DeStefano I
Secretary/Planning Director
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, URGING ALL CITIZENS AND WATER USERS
IN THE COMMUNITY TO COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS
SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND THE
WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar is 100% dependent
on imported water from the Three Valleys Municipal Water District;
and
WHEREAS, despite the 10% reduction in water use
storage in the State Water Project and major reservoirs is still
dangerously low; and
WHEREAS, the recent storm activity has not made a
difference in the level of precipitation in the State Water Project
and that watershed is still far below normal; and
WHEREAS, the State Water Project has approved only
10% of the District's water supply request for 1991; and
WHEREAS, unless the citizens of Diamond Bar and
water users in the community implement substantial conservation,
the likelihood of making it through the summer without drastic
water rationing, is very slim; and
WHEREAS, as a result, a 30% reduction on water
service to homes, offices and industries, and a 90% cutback in
water supplies to agriculture, reservoir storage and groundwater
replenishment, will be in effect for citizens and water users in
the community of Diamond Bar, commencing April 1, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California hereby
wholeheartedly supports the 30% mandatory water conservation
program initiated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California in cooperation with the Walnut Valley Water District and
urges the citizens of Diamond Bar and water users in the community
to do the same.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on the day
of , 1991
Mayor
i :y of Diamond Bar
V
I, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the
day of , 1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar
AGENDA NO. 7_
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
March 14, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Sid Jalal Mousavi, City Engineer/Public �Torks Director
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 18722
BACKGROUND 6 DISCUSSION:
On December 23, 1987, the County of Los Angeles conditionally approved Tentative
Parcel Map No. 18722. The project consists of commercial lots on approximately
18.26 acres known as the Country Hills Towne Centre. The Tentative Map was
scheduled to expire on December 23, 1990, however, the Planning Commission
extended the life of the map until March 23, 1991. The applicant has now filed
a Final Map. Staff has reviewed the map and has found that it conforms with the
Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinances.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council: (1) approve the attached Final Map No.
18722; (2) authorize the City Engineer to execute the map; and (3) direct the City
Clerk to certify it and process it for recordation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number:
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
VED
5-----=s-�- ----------------------
Robert L..Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski
City Manager City Attorney
U� y
Terrence L. Be an r
Assistant City Manager
PARCFL MAP N0. 18722
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION
20, AND THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 21, AND THE N.W. 1/4 OF
SECTION 28, AND THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP
2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND
OF PARCELS 1. 2, 3, AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13963 FILED
IN BOOK 166, PAGES 94 THROUGH 96, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL
MAPS IN THE OFFICE Of THE RECORDER, OF THE COUNTT
OF LOS ANGELES.
ANACAL ENGINEERING CO.
C. J. OUEYREL, L.B. 2988 DECEMBER,1987
OWNERS STATEMENT
V1 NREBT BTA'IS THAT V9 AN TNN 0008 OF ON AN INTMANTED a THE
LWIDO INCLUDW HITNIN TNR SUBDIVISION BNGw ON THIS NAP uITNIN TNS
DIBTIMCTIVD BONDER LINES, AMC NR CONSIST TO THE PREPARATION AND "LINO
or SAID SUP ND SUBDIVISION. NR NMI DEDICATE TO I= PUBLIC UGR
ALL B"U". NICWAYR, AND &THEN PUBLIC WAYS 361011 ON BID NAP.
AS A DEDICATION TO PUBLIC USE. WHILE ALL OF FOUNTAIN SPRINGS ROAD
WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SMIVIIION REMAIN! A PUBLIC STREET WE
HEREBY GRANT TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND SAN THE MIGHT TO RESTRICT
ACCE98 FROM THIS SUBDIVISION TO THE SAID STREET OTHER THAN THE
ACCE08 WHICH PRESENTLY EXISTS IF ANY PORTION OF SAID STREET
WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDIVISION IS VACATED, SUCH VACATION
TERMINATES THE ABOVE DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATES.
WE FURTHER STATE THAT WE XNOW OF NO EASEMENT DR STRUCTURE EXISTING
WITHIN THE EASEMENTS HEREIN OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC
OTHER THAN PUBLICLY OWNED WATER LINES, SEWERS, OR STORM DRAINS, {HAT
WE WILL GRANT NO RIGHT ON INTEREST WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID
EASEMENTS OFFERED TO THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT WHERE SUCH RIGHT OR
INTEREST IS EXPRESSLY MADE !INJECT TO THE SAID EASEMENT.
WE AL90 HEREBY DEDICATE FOR PUBLIC USE THE EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY
KWM PURPOSES SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
LANDSING PACIFIC FUNO,A DELAWARE CORPORATION BY DEED
NECOROED FEB. 8114�n,10/0 As INSTAUMEMT NO 90-293414, OFFICIAL RECORDS
AMARX CAYMAN
SENIOS VICE PRESIDENT
STATE OF J�LA IFORNIA I IJ
COUNTY OF rIaC�Q 1
ON
�.I// jT,fl/KFONE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, NOTANT PUDLIC IN AND FOR
w 8 ATE YER LLY ArrEA11ED PERSONALLY KNOWN
TO ME OR PROVED TO M[ N fME SASID OF 3ATIYACTMY EVIDENCE TO SE
TME PEASUM ■NO pl[CDTm `Tli WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS THE INW-C '14441
TD�YE�OiYvHHEE SAID$ OF SATISFACTORY tt�lGDNCE TO K FIr PENSIONHO WN TO INS ON PROVED
EXECUTED THE WITHIN IIgTMMNT TTADSM TI[ NCIKTMY OF
1 RD MAT TIGN SUCH COORPORATIOON CQgITW10 TINE OMNI
MTI O MTCXFMOWW� G
TO ATG DY{AWG ON A RESOLUTION a ITS HADD OF OMCTOND.
WITNESS NY HAND. // �J
NO0.4-%A/tl FOR p STATE ✓
SHEET 1 OFf
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
TRIG nF I.E p.44pAYW EY A■ ar AXMN.' th CfaWeClRn R s By oaTllw
!IVa IWOORM OSLO 3R w&Yo al o VIfD llM t tho1WNEIG OE [JM
1"Ni vN1an 1rD bi DPIB' 3.oEE1 21,1951 k E1.r T4pBK a< that
t IBIIDAI
CONI I up OMFAIW OB ND.Ganfd 21, 1951• I IMIVAW rstate"n clic cM/
pIN041 NNP AIeATAYKINRL3F eiN.TSn4 W t1Y rppNovDE C! CNrIDcc1APIB1IF
wow t9PII+tIvS Bo, lT w.
%OMEY L 4�LS. 2*8s
SAND FA+.
u
� NO 99M
u9D�u
i
4F09 CALIfON�
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
THE FOLLOWING SIONATIRED WA(BUTTED BEDII ITTED MRS THE PROVISIONS OF
'DEDTIOE 66476 (RI u II.V11) or TBE SUBDIVISION HAP AOT. nm
,STUART 13 @UCH TBT IT CANNOT NIFER INN A M TITLE AIRS SAID
$14UMN AND NOT NQUIP D K TIER IOML AOBM.
COUNT"
SANITARYWB
OF IDS ANGELES. EASEMENT NOIDES FOR SANITARY NPURPOSES
N DIOOIDBED SV DEED APODOM NGgNM L. 190 N INBTMINB" DO.
7211 I1 BOOB 03107, PND A7 OF OFFICIAL now$. NESORDN Or ICS
NOSY COUNTY.
RUMORS N CALIFORNIA IDIRON COMPANY. A CORPORATION, nUMT DERIDER
PK SLID UTILITY Karam N DISCLOSED /T No mmm "SHINY 3.
1966 N 1NME MW NG. St19 IB POO[ DOLBY, FASB A6,OP OFFICIAL
ABD R . WmmB a NOS ABORIY Oa1Nn.
OESBBL "LLPWU OONPAIIT OF UUPMIA, A CORPORATION. ZWM"
GOLDEN M PUBLIC:IML F A8DISCLOM BY D® RMMMM
WAOS 4, 1966 N IDETNNMMI NG. 161 IG DOD[ 072". PNS $01,
W OFFICIAL Mows. "Mad
a ROE AMMLES COUNTY.
BWMU CALIFORNIA 0130 COMPANY. A CORPORATION. BED OW NOLM
PUBLICPON NnOM T 00. W411 11 DOUG03590 PNR 7", ED by MO ESWJANUARY !.
FICIAL
1961
1800151. MOWU OF W@ AMMLED CUM.
ONSINA1, TDLS111005 ~SAY W UUFMZA. A CORPORATION. LABOMT MONIS
PON KNOWS UTILt" MrPOKB U DISCLOAED BY AIDS AGCORM PERSUADE 20.
1967 AS IBE7711MDMY NG. 2661 11 GOES D3%2, PAM 906. OF OFFICIAL HUMAN.
R1M9OS W 104 ANGEat O Mn.
FOUNTAIN 3POI101 PBVUDhMl COMPANY, A 00911.41, PAMU4MIP. RA MMI
NGNEN POS VUICJ PAWINinDW M "AMC AMU AGO "IDERTAL
MMM AS DISCLOSES 41 AMD710T R� JIM Il. 191315 IM MNOT
$0. 3". W OFFICIAL "ON". Noma$ W IO/ NGEY MM.
AIID N![ANI1[iti
PJP�
mNau Mia --
I P UI,�.
WIJIUP VAIs" WATER 01MICT. "AS T SOLD= PON WADY PIPEUK "Mom
al$CLAM AT DR DWDROSO MT 97. 1913 N IBTNRSNT 10. 1740 AND
'ALA
.
Y PRINCIPAL PLACE OF NBIMEB S�
W OR"" COUNTY.
OMIC/ CQR.n I
3AYUARI 13 1977 N INTMMBE PO. 11'446194NORD$ Alp SEPTEMBER 14.IS73 AS
INSTRUMIN>f 119.384E ALL OP OFFICIAL AECOS• RECOF LOD ANOELFS
„� y
COUNTY'
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 11-1f.-11..
BWWM CALINSNIA 0390 COWNV. A OONOPATION, MEN=? SOLDER FOR
PUBLIC UTILITY ]PURPOSES 0 DISCUSSED Of D® AIME WMSU B.
1964N IU"M W PO. N.11710", 0► 41FTCIAL MOMS. KOOKS W
IDE AMGEY COMITY.
CONTINENTAL LAND TITLE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS TRUSTEE, WIDER A DEED 01 TRUST RECORDED MARCH 8, 198E AS
INSTRUMENT 610. /S-SNTTS, OF OF/ICAL RECORMI.
Nv�RowL D1 MAN GER sTFMF .IARCIA L DAILY
W
vlt PTIOONEIN i ASSISTANT Vut PR/GWENT
I
RECORD DATA IS FROM PARCEL MAP No. 13041,
PARCEL MAP No. 13965, P.M.B. 135-27-29, 9 DEED
RECD. 2-22-90 AS INST. No. 90-293414 O.R-
FNgTAIN SPRING$ WOIMMT COMPANY U=Wn MOLDED FM MIIIDING
01 DWM ADD FOOTING MPOM N DISCLOSED BT NO "CMM It WOR
62A2, PAM TW, OF OF"Mu, EMOM. MUCO" W IDS AMU M Darn.
DIAMOND BAN PLAZA. A LIMITED PNTHERIHIP EASEMENT HOLDER /ON PUBLIC
UFILITIEI 6V AGARIMI IT RECORDED DECE►U[A 28. NN AS 11111TRIAKUT N.
NAT114446.01FICIAL IKCON/.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISN COMPANY A CORPORATION, EAKMEMT HOLDER
POB U NBN. TIES I V t�ICgBE1C,� BEPTEMSEA 16. IDN N INSTRUMENT
6[618441,T
NtLEM10M[ CONGAS/ of CALIFORNIAN
MIA, A COIT IOM.EASEYEMT
NOEO FOA PUBLIC UT0.1TId_R1r CEO II[CO DED DECtlRDEA �. ISN 6'
WSTKW UT N. 011-11144052, wiITV,�PIRI�I DA[[C0O1I1I0Nf
WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICTA PUBLIC CORPORATTHE RIGHT TO KMDVC AMY,IOON,, EASEMENT HOLDER
ROOWTH THMOK Liss M920 STIIESWIBE MroVUMW. AN AT AMY TOY[ �A
AND ANY OT
GGRM
ami MICS eT ON W�iuttvn6iMION CUM M N[t ALL AND r4 A CIM[
DEPIUM CCNSOXTUM,6avlea Alp/OM SINN[ IDM, co ALL AN ook W
SFPEINASE, NTrjy sIE IM ENUIMI6MF__;1' DAC I NT _,t1T[I1
TAAIISFNATIw [tl6 NCORW N f I6N A6 i•
q.IN8410 M OFFICIAL 6EC@M
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, EASEMENT HOLDER FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL.
ENN0bM rl0.M%CYEDcD MARCH
IOIIYMMO INF8MEaOFFICIAL
I _ 50BET Il OF 4
PARCEL MAP NO. 18722
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,STATE OF CALIFORNIA
'CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
THIS YAP CONFORMS WITH THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT
AMD LOCAL OROINAWAS
SID JALAL MOUSAVI RCEN 42645 DATE
CITY ENGINEER
CTT OF DIAMOND BAR
I. HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND AM SATISFIED THAT IT IS
TE NIC LY�ORIiT.
l��- ATTt�4 aF..�t M nv
J N.ISTIK N Ci .26558 DATE i
CITY COUNCIL CERTIF1"TE
1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY
ONOT WANE CITT /$1,AMOND BAR AT A AMD THAT THEREUPON SAIDMCOTINGUNCIL 010. BY AN OF HELD
ORDER DULY PAfSEf AND ENTERED APPROVED SAID MAP AND DID ACCEPT OM
BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE DEDICATION FON STASETC HIGHWAYS. AND OTHER
PUBLIC WAYS. AND SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT . AND DID ALSO APPROVE SAID
MAP PURSANT TO THE PROVIBIONB OF THE BUSDIVIEION MAP ACT.
CITY CLERK, CITY OF DIAMOND DAR -FAyr—
GTATR OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF I AS RA19CLAW I �•
DN wdjS .i /} / 111-1 NS, TIM U-IRR11114 Dom, `A IN.I.4
►�WE /ILy�N F01 SAIONA 4TNNNOIM'ESITOAIMTOR ► ID 7D Ol TIIN ISIS
DF QiIl�ACTMT IVIDINCS TO NN TNN PBRSGN NNO B.C.., TNS BITIHN
IMSTRUMMNI��IRjA!�Sw{,�/ C �_ PRUIDNNT,
ON PIIOISE TLP NB ON`TMB-EIV., SATISFACTOR�YA �SlWIEyyINEI II'ETO 01 TRA FU30W
NM0 1ESLIRY 7HI WITHIN ISY6K1mUMM ASN POP TNN COA►ONATIW TINT I BCUTID
TXI NITNIN INSTRUNFM AN ACDIIO L OOND TO WE TINT SUCH CORPORATION
UNCUTID ?N11WITHIN INMUVANT POSSUM TO ITS SI•LANS OR A BBSOWTION
OF ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AS TIHST91.
BITNPS! NT HAND:
TIG IN Fpl LlD STATE
NY PN/NCIPAL PLACO OF AUSIN153 IS
IN IAS ANGELES COUNTY.
III COMIISlION EXPIRES 1 > ,
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE
JURISDICAT109 OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAN TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED
IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IB SUBJECT, AND WHICH
MAY BE PAID IN FULL. HAVE BEEN PAID IN FILL.
CITY CLERK. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DATE
r
gcALEI I*, SO' SHEET i Of. 1
PARCFI- MAP Na. 10722
IN THF CITY OF DIAMOND 9AR.000NTY OF LOS ANGELES,STAT9 OF CALIFORNIA
ANACAL ENGINEERING C0.'
C. J. OUEYREL, L.S. 2996 DECEMBER. 1967
100'
/ 49' 'I ' 31'
PY 19• M, M'07—me,
-'0 A _ N.49.12'4_2'W__._ 625.00, M rs w nN TN NO
[w PY IID 11tH
Ea OUNTAI SPRINGS ROAD --bc �� 1 /wa140,mof
n w_49 Iz 42 M 343.00' sso 00
I f400 - uf•7 w nnr • —�
� IzsOo �
A— 1- 50' OF To'iMY g • N.25 00' ` I 0'
r•a[ 1[YT. er ■ I
v14/Y•nlfsommy ■ fwflvgl4rri 6¢Q;;Z:ItT. AI,IIO 80. FT. E•39x7' I� 49' SI'
,q [•.Wl[q, 4{ •W sWr aa�6' G•90'00'00'i
M6 kyr ffyy . Iuvn [Nlvn[r�
N'12'W p
49'I2
-4". 0.001
NTr• i,[LNT
00'
.
10WIvgION o o
q':i°fu.�r urr I l6.lY ' 40' 79HE. 8 D V
f[.M jV aL 1I//Y•� YIIY/I,'t iNJJ M^
rl r .'NM[W'��M' M �EE'jj� • O iOUNTf IM 9•x[00'
^ ' O ��1 l•7f tl `
c— r,If'IYYY"W I p
w 1 nrv•tl wir�liir 0'4716-E. N1 2"W. I�,S 1{I 00' I �if0
, I—" rr[0 n 1 IMLL•w ��00• '.110.8{'-•1I'-� m .
[ ■. [ ,� 1 : , [ [• I 'Ixvx•w: nf.ls r ru IP�x N
b
AT
Y•arfw a•rr[[wT �� W
MfM T M 9[t . r f [•rrrr M u[ •wu[[ [a1 �[• p' ���"` �0��)��i=� \,
ABY fPp ftlf 9[f. w y
Nw ~ •/. �17Y Of 01[w01i j ,[Ir•T[ Mlrp[r
orm
N t I
IA ,
112.783 80. FT. I�rra IV1r.4� 12 , aO• s
i y
^uur oe
• ,� I I I I 74,888 60FT. o♦ p9J
I 'W% r'1�'Ii_��.Ij42� Igl •rl
rN I r t I! ^I w 10•.7[' ro Hyl- i� � .I .r 1V00'04 �E � I31
u�
,149124xw. �N49.1�1
1x2.00' 1
If a• y10•?T'I!'E. g1.99'
"4x'W. 77.08
is
6Eia1L "A172,4I6 SOFT I •22' 0180fK�i _�••�M
NEaEON a I,[n•r[ww[r• �`�� rf •,
,�� w n,u•w- $ n m
♦ww h�
' tp, Ir
p 1 t
Jf 3liD-J1' 161 ; • „� :
24x.33' - 1092!` foa / •'L,1 I�I ,� '1
N.49'Ix'4x'W. 1M• 36768' !
goal
240.33*
197'�`V•
�j19rv•v rn[■•r Inws• yy
11414
p
L{I.1106•Ix r r[rv•n wiv[r• I7 .0�� nrr to "••� J . o�—
AM II9[L•NG � • ijv •I ,[w DLLYOIIO� K,{!•49'S8'W o �
•Ir r iu IIx.T I, � ♦w o
'76,046 64 -FT IN.{9'4{'68'W' lWA4' 1-•- SUGPLACEi
I yU4YE TaeLE in I ;,
DELTA LAC LENGTH
�M{x'{I'87•W.
Ivo
�it :� ' � ! TV •t3 G � 9
VV tpp D'
uaa{'Y� fli ra1r�P7784r +49'. SI'
a:oeo• oo•4frr 9&4r s 10,
SSE SHEET No. 4
19:IIB�D'L'Jf4l11�>�.'i111'
��a w rI. NIM. Pa fr Dw
Y F ILII PTAT1 DRIVE
LXIR4NI p 'ef G� D
M![ MI I
yp�Iq�p�}9Yy�,y�I*w�fI- -Ali '
C ; �Iflf•fN1�9,wT 11'
DETAIL "A"
'LEGEND
INDICATES THE BOUNDARY
OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED,
IV 1HIS MAP
• I
r
/
SCALgI 1'e 60' I- SHEET 4 Of 4
PAR��MAP No. � 8722
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ANACAL ENGINEERING CO.
C. J OUEYREL. L.S. 2988 DECEMBER. 1987
SEE SHEET N0. 3 9.32'41:.&W yAR,.;; SES
t I /6l,7 1'e3•W NO2`4f'98-W I I 29044�, / •A�,
1 67.
0.36.1 8'E GAR._ 31'
9 .25 OU"RFINE
yN/Iye,IYL.NE . a • I rT,p - 1°. --TIM
W
e�W. _N!i'17'49•W WI
•'� I 1 p~p o r —7 Iff.ff' u .r w rlr couurx PLACE
50' . I b o9 t c I■,vA rt YmW 1 �T3 LY A ILN /011 TAA//6 t1AWLL
■AO TN[LAN uti�;• 1 i°ruitYE�e pwm.AAretI luAta
14
n.oz or41 I J (� N 52'S1'63.W 183 36: ` X1,802 801T. I
L•234 60 i.
'�
8.6623.0
k � A ' Vy[ eWT M TMt C0WT1 a IATA Y,VIVAY
e T'1r�iw A..aut rw tAA,rt.yY NrY 92,143 SOFT. I I�•a�• e
*e.I . i �au i:iu' - I rY tat Yc p a NIY. "I. GA
I' I 1 L r
w rAI w yo Al IA I m
r t
NL iN, M E1- '1 [ANw.T a Ioun.IN AM,Wt a t p 1 r
Nr[LCIw■. G IM tULeW I ( PO
n tOly Yi . F. . s PiLt[ �� IIA I
[EfE EEL N t Yat M Iee a
Z°�L /IIIlLA1f p I q � y
IL82'41't3•W 24000_ I Y
a.'M ,�L yy 77I '02E. +. 32'19'3B'W 186e0
��` (((''9���yN.lt[ rnE■ Lua awT N a. e.i9p 179.69' O
}-L.YNN vALLEr ul[9 I Ly
L Cr91.rY tYew ////I
YMr�wAu ��-
D2.
ya••nati . I u619. 24.18• 15 ��' LEGEN 1cATEs
�F!12.49.13•w. oat- 13,888gOFT. .` e�iiwDAaror
6'• I y w,N /w1 Tor 'NE LAND 9EIND
,r or eyAlo.o tA■ {Y.SI' w / 0 fU,DLA DE0 By TN19
61,814 SOFT. , (Y aANrtYr N.HY • o fM
' N 32"49.387W. 15707"
a •�Y
44.92• I i
L
',I`c1N�j7'1002-E }; N �8.70Si- a li
N62'49'S8•W. J �. \ryl - f° „
-411 I 1337 00' I � n
ENfr Ilh Y.1P I Q cm.
I I I mJl`IL,`, v rc wncrAr H a
\S\S ♦ AW %i■LLAy
yl iv r IDO'
49' 651-
m e o ^„p
99,715 SOFT. m I
A Ia
WATN II t�1� II /�eC,T1oNYNu;WlYIi%At�WW666111.
IAwWTt/1A. ■ TNa
CmaA
INITAIW•EWAA
..,too
I 1S
2S46 Sn.FT.
Nz a/'49'39"W 20323' t°aA/ 0 /
oe
VYVLL[r �
f
IAIV/Y eNt YC N I I / l/�
N N. NA t4 T. I�u
R
N1A�6�'r1.1E'Srw4P1 r N Sc. 1911101
B.YA'•w .
47,4.3 LOFT. j 1 DI' %T+ M 1'1 ' .. Ly13L. •
"CC' �Nez•{09p3�-W. r �.I�� L�i NT Oge•D"'�A.1e
r=•�L_�)"e6'6-�
w_ ■7
38,108 LOFT. �
k La•LEr � rl n
'J t
b
r�
.etf \\•�. :•♦ \ C,F�
N52"4.9u3e"W 2210 0' i R
A�NOT A ♦
ers 2 y
1�
4\ P��� 40,310 /OFT.
_ M O W.Ul.L,TY I.VI PART
"Q .aa oa iVIA A■ "ACOA".". Cop"
M COLD CC.r
•acL.u-1 14OA 'YL
INA
"CPS 43-4111 qf
�OF THIS 1. �
/A 1.rY u w
CURVE TABLE [te7
N ra. toll. �Oqj �•g Urunx CA111-0
N by •o. cL a1YY Co n.
0 0.00' h, f. 'tfa�. a i. aL Now
AAN K
Nei RAOIV>i DELTA ARC LEN6Th f C. Tj q4p ell in
4 4f.00 3 so.
•p• N L,IY [A•[e[IIT i N
t[.l■.L NIm c N N
00'
88Q �• TJt I r. ►[II NY Nc w s
a•• '�N M IN,4A n •i
sSop )••
ii�S00� � ���• �,},
W ? rTs• o SUBDIVISION R
�aIr Wyf ENT Y j ,//
✓ LL iniKc M `n\ ( Ai.1 Nyn.Ar a rr 100•OIL I a
K. t' \� � `� ,: JAW w,Yu. IAu.,u-n-Y 49• SI'
`► .w 1
00'
AGENDA NO. /
BACKGROUND:
On February 19, 1991 the City Council authorized the advertisement of bids for
median_ reconstruction, landscape modification, and traffic signal installation on
Grand Avenue at Shotgun Lane. Formal bids were received on March 12, 1991 from
eight contractors.
The low bid received for this project (see attached Bid Summary Form) was from
Intersection Maintenance Service for $69,263.00 which is 18% under the Engineer's
Estimate of $84,120.00. The other bids ranged from 17% under to 5% over the
Engineer's Estimate.
It is anticipated that construction will start May 1, 1991 and be completed by
July 1, 1991. This project will be funded by Grand Avenue Construction Funds
($49,263.00) and the Diamond Bar Country Association ($20,000.00).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council receive and accept the formal bid of
Intersection Maintenance Service, for the median reconstruction, landscape
modifications and traffic signal construction on Grand Avenue at Shotgun Lane and
authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project.
(Narrative contintied on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $69,263.00
Budgeted Amount $84,120.00
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $
Revenue Source: Grand Avenue Funds and Diamond Bar Country Association
RE`� D B r K/
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
March 15,
1991
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO:
Honorable
Mayor and
Members of the City Council
VIA:
Robert L.
Van Nort,
City Manager `
FROM:
Sid Jalal
Mousavi,
City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT:
AWARD OF
BID - GRAND AVENUE AT SHOTGUN LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
On February 19, 1991 the City Council authorized the advertisement of bids for
median_ reconstruction, landscape modification, and traffic signal installation on
Grand Avenue at Shotgun Lane. Formal bids were received on March 12, 1991 from
eight contractors.
The low bid received for this project (see attached Bid Summary Form) was from
Intersection Maintenance Service for $69,263.00 which is 18% under the Engineer's
Estimate of $84,120.00. The other bids ranged from 17% under to 5% over the
Engineer's Estimate.
It is anticipated that construction will start May 1, 1991 and be completed by
July 1, 1991. This project will be funded by Grand Avenue Construction Funds
($49,263.00) and the Diamond Bar Country Association ($20,000.00).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council receive and accept the formal bid of
Intersection Maintenance Service, for the median reconstruction, landscape
modifications and traffic signal construction on Grand Avenue at Shotgun Lane and
authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project.
(Narrative contintied on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $69,263.00
Budgeted Amount $84,120.00
In Account Number: N/A
Deficit: $
Revenue Source: Grand Avenue Funds and Diamond Bar Country Association
RE`� D B r K/
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence Belanger
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
Z -1
•` q,
O
10
07
V
O,
Vn
41
W
O 3
IN II--•
co
^ e
ISI
N
r•
C
O
'i0
N
O
f)
M
tin
0° a
rt
M
O' r •'
C
(D
R
iN
rt
Ir
G
M
C
X (D
O
I'i
''S
C
R
R
H.
G
I� a s
r*in
b
N
rt
' R
EH.n
R
77��pp
n
H
A
m
m
H
c�
a
n
a
o
r
p
rt
w
m
N
m
0.
n
N
9
`
w
r•
r•
r -'r•
m
a
rt
o
o
Q3a
ro
CZ
R
w
R
rO
Drt
3
O
R
(D
rn
C
Z
0 O
-1
O
T
r
�
y
0
----------------------------
O
v
00
W
N_
W
ON
c
O
y
r
F
1
N
W
10
w
m
cl
i
7
L
0
g
c
C
T
-----------
m
a
`n
r
'
'
'
U'
r
r
z
G7 ❑
N
m
m
W
r ~
N
r
O
O
O
w
O
w
U
r
D Z
a
N
S
p
O
S
O
m 1
H
O
S
S
S
m m
O z
00
(ON
wZ
n
.x
�--
N
W
r•
W
DD
O,
N
�o
�•
Inm
O
O
Z ZCD
m
7m0
_
N
W
S
O
S
O
1O
O
I-'
N
4
vi
O
O
O
p
O
S
S
O
O
O
O
r
O
Fn-( 10
1CO0
Y W N H
OlC
9 M
r
Ipn
In
N
O
tpr
r
a z
T'i
y r
W n
p�
O
pO
pO
O
S
S
S
m
O
th
O
O
O
O ry na
(,
N
H
r-•
O�
I--•
W
(D (D rft
4-1
N
W
W
n H H.
L,
In
O
O
In
1
R1 'd 8
O y
0 I
rn
(
rn
In
N
In
Ol
O+
(11
n
O
O
O
-+
H.
.omO
v'i
p
S
O
O
S
O
O
O
g
O
O
O
r
OD N r
n
I-
n
w
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
od :3g
E
o
v+
n
o o
T
O
in
O
O
p�
O
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
-1
mO
O
y Y
( N
W
R
O\°
V
n O
�'
m
°
O
N
t-•
N
_
R
w rt 'A
o.
O
N
W
W
�O
r
(D
y,
R Qr •0 o-
I-•
7
1�
O
O
O
p�
'O
ON
V
O,
00
W
d
O
V
O
O
O
In
In
v+
V
In
O
y
g
s
g
o
S
S
S
S
o
rD
��p
O
CD
DC
r�
v
o
p
wg,CY,o�y
C)
ro
t
(� �D
wa
rM7
O
c
O
0
(aJD
O
cox
N O
r
O
r
F
>�
iOnR r
r n•'i
G N n
L^
0
OD
C3
CDO�V
nw C
O
�' C
ry�
I
O
I"' �•
w H
O
p
O
O
O
Inn
00
O
In
FN
D
C n
H O
114O
O
S
S
O
S
CD
S
r
w
`�
O
(D
S
O
C r• O
•IJ
M
chn
V
y
y
V
N
In
O
.n
a-�
r•
r
�"{ D
�fGi
O
p
O
c
S
r
O
O
O
In
r
v.
.1
O
�'
2!C
r•VO
r
N "• �
co
o
0
O
0
o
v
O
v�
m i
O I-' P.
"'
O O O. (/)
O
O
O
O
O
rE>
V
rnD
,O�a
co C7
(O�
A+
w
N
r-+
-•
+
w
I-'
rn
`�..0 yH
((DD n
41 H
C
W
W
:o
0
G
�" rt
�i � m
°°
61
wH
"'
'-'
w
S
o
O
0
s
o
v
0
0
w
0o
w
rn
�o
n
`°w�H•
w o
1�7
R
O
r
n
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
V+
O
O
O
!-S
w,
rrn
m
rrtiC �•
❑
ry w
-a
'e
O
10
00 i
V
a
V�
C
0
n
t
o
o
r b
o
o
m
w
n
a
C
3
£
E
w
m
9
to
r•
C
O
O
y
y
n
n
�*+
KC
6 P.
N
N
H
rt
It
•<
x
C
H21
n•
''.
rt
DC
R'
>S
rt
rt
7
W
m
d
m
m
Id
w°
~•
W
03
~•
@a@
C
wr
O
n
oho
`�=
3
-I
rt
9
C
N
',D
N
A
I(n
m
v
r
b
C
z
I 4
•i
9
7
a,
D3lb
rCr
D
C
u
It
tF
rt
m
O
z
O
C
N
4
O
-1
D
r
rt
T
O
N
C
0
D
I
V,
W
�C�
�
N
W
O
a
W
I
z
m
ci
<
Z
O
N
D
m
Z
W
Z mr
G7
v
cn
r
cl,
Id
aC
z
A
_
m
m
z
i
_
QQ
p
S
Z z
CL
m
a
O
m N
W
N
Dr
r
�
r
r
�
w
JH-
�-• 1--'
In
C"'
W
00
O
kn
O
In
r
N
H
O
l,n
C'
v C
�° z
V O Y•
r•-'
r-
Y•
pv
m "�
N n
O
�--'
w rt
W � n
to
�
v+
O
O
O
v+
O
O
In
�• � r33.
[A
N A ru
aw
O
F
N
r
F
In
N
WRn
N
m
y0y!1
00
%O
a
4-
Ln
00
N
rN-+
O
O
rCr•
o
m
p�w
O
a
00
O
00
O
O
00
a
W
OO
Oo
In
O
In
O
O
N
F
In
N
a
r-
00 b w
o
I N
w
S
o
0
0
0
0
�
o
O
L-
o
0
x m
�
Q w
o
o
In
H
v
G
ty
a
o
0
0o
rn
v
r
t�
Dz
w m
C3l,
�C wf
O
m�
SOY•
O
v p.
C
O
O
S
In
O
O
C�1 �
IN
•C
in
�
�
H
�
O O R'+
N
Pj C
a
OH
�
N
N
N
O
W
r-•
N
O
N� � O
�C
O
V
C
of m
00
0
0
o
v,
N
o
w
w
4-
v*
00
-1
o
-4
a oo
w m
..
N$ m o
�n H ry
a
F
F
o
O
0
O
O
N
a
00
to
N
00
0•(D
S
Cl
O
O
S
O
W
O
O
O
a
(>
O
w
o
0
o
o
in
0
0
o
Ln
b
7
D
O
OrH{{
CA F
V N Y•
vi
Z
N r• ~ N.
v (mow
O
CA
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
o
IOn =1
C rt
Dm�w
C
�n
iA
o
0
0
0
0
�
`,ffi P (DO Co
o
�
N
w
'--�
�-•
vi
N
w
�
a
�'000
O h O
F C7 7..
W
O
N
a
00
V
In
O
a
•O
i
rt
10
O£ £ K
V
O
vi
O
O
O
D,
O
00
a00
(31
V
O
r
W
O
O
O
D
N m w
-1
O
O
O
'd rt
wy n w
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
F w 0
�O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�, N
O
N
W H 0
W
V
In
91co O
It
'-"�
C"
O
O
O
�n
N
l~i�
'.O
11 Z
n O w
r
fV-. C G N
A. rty
m -1
li
x
�Fi y
Vi
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o CH.
m
o�1
o
00
_
C
03
n•
O�
r-•
W
r
N
X --F
F
F
In
lFn
M K
/mom
"
x
Vro w
O
w
00
L-
t�
H
"
F
11
ON
1,
w
O
Ho ab
T
N� w C
N
F
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
rn
In
O
00
O
V,
r-•
V
N
O
-1
�k
�i
Q
CJ
CJ
[J
CJ
a
C)
C1
r
m•
ON
~ �
m
0
C.
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
o
m ow
v
Walnut Malloy School District
880 South Lemon Avenue, Walnut, California 91789 • (714) 595-1261 • Fax (714) 598-8423
March 6, 1991
Robert Van Non,
City of Diamond
21660 E. Copley
Diamond Bar, CA
Dear Bob:
City Manager
Bar
Drive, Suite 100
91765
l"
Ronald W. Hockwalt, Ed. D , Superint ent 1
In individual discussions with you regarding the computer set up at the
Sheriff Substation, I think we both agree that the idea is most noteworthy
and needs to be funded and in place. I believe we can receive some good
publicity for a positive step regarding gang prevention activities. If each
of the cities and the school district contribute $800 to the computer set
up, we should be able to ensure the installation of this technology and
initiate the program.
I thank you for your cooperation and would hope that you would take the
necessary steps to forward the $800 to Captain Lee McCown at the
Sheriffs Substation.
I appreciate your cooperation and support.
Most sincerely,
Ron Hockwalt
Superintendent
cc: Governing Board
Captain Lee McCown
SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF
March 4, 1991
1
i
Lff
Toru to of Ka -0 ,tau Aro
��♦ O4 105 4,yCf
'Nall DfAustire
'�(` '
7L oo Augelro, Ulf aru� 90012 G+crronN`�
Mr. Gary Werner, Mayor
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley Drive, #100
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Attention: Robert Van Norte, City Manager
Dear Mayor Werner:
In April, 1991, Sheriff Sherman Block will bid for the 1993
California Police Summer Games, which will be held June 19-27,
1993. If he is selected as host, it is the Sheriff's desire to
hold the Games in the San Gabriel Valley. We are seeking your
formal support for this worthwhile, non-profit event.
The Police Summer Games was established twenty-five years ago and
has held competition each succeeding year in cities throughout
California. The Games have grown to attract over 8,000 police
officers each year, competing in forty-five different sports. The
Police Summer Games is the largest and most prestigious event of
its kind in the world.
Every government official, every business person, and every
individual who hears of our event is invariably excited and wants
to be involved. The Police Summer Games have a tradition of being
a community event. It is a magnet for drawing community and
business together in support of those athletes who on a daily basis
are the defenders of life and property.
The spirit of the Games is felt by all who are involved. We have
dedicated the next two and one half years to this spirit in hopes
of producing the largest and most spectacular Police Summer Games
ever. But, we cannot hope to achieve this goal without your
support.
At the present time we are only requesting a Letter of Intent that
you support our efforts for the bid. If we are fortunate enough to
host the games, we will be notified by April 5, 1991.
f�
CITY OF STOCKTON
COFFICE
BARBARA FABS OF THE CITY COJNCIL
^iu-rGr STOCKTON. LA 85202
2E SOU-" SAN J040U11: STREET
STOCKTON, IZALiFORNIi4 95202
946-0446
February 5, 1990
Lieutenant Henry D. Freeman
Stockton Police Athletic Commission
22 East Market Street
Stockton, CA 95202
LETTER OF SUPPORT - 1992 CALIFORNIA POLICE SUMMER GAMES
As the Mayor of Stockton, it is indeed a pleasure to write
this letter of support/endorsement for the Stockton Police
Department's bid to host the 1992 California Police Summer
Games in the City of Stockton.
Our interest in the staging of these Summer Games is re-
flected in the fact that the Stockton Police Department has
( been an active participant in the Police Olympics for many
years and did, in fact, host a most successful and memorable
Olympics in Stockton in 1987.
Be assured the City of Stockton is in full support of the
program and will provide assistance as necessary. We know
the community and the Committee will welcome enthusiasti-
cally this prestigious amateur athletic event to our com-
munity and will prove to be both capable and receptive hosts.
Hosting of this 1992 Summer Games would also provide an op-
portunity to showcase our entire community and our area does
offer an outstanding setting for an event of this type. Ex-
cellent facilities are available, including hotel/motel ac-
commodations, restaurants, recreation and cultural activities
for the participants/competitiors and spectators.
For these reasons, we wholeheartedly support the Stockton
Police Department's bid to host this event.
BARBARA FASS
MAYOR
BF: saw
114
"STOCKTON... CALIFORNIA'S SUNRISE SEAPORT"
J
M F r 16.. C C,7 .._ �. .' i ....- ....-. �.. .
February 5, 1990
Lieutenant Henry D. Freeman
Stockton Police Athletic Commission
22 East Market Street
Stockton, Ca 95202
LETTER OF SUPPORT TO HOST 1992 CALIFORNIA
POLICE SUMMER GAMES IN CITY OF STOCKTON
As City Manager of the City of Stockton and on behalf of
City staff, I would like to express complete support of
the Police Department's bid to host the 1992 California
Police Summer Games in our City.
( Stockton is centrally located in an area where access to
the airport and freeway is easily attained. Ideal athletic
facilities are also available for the types of events that
will be held during these Summer Games.
More importantly, I feel that since our Police Department
did serve as the host for the 1987 Police Olympics, which
were very successful, they now have the expertise to again
coordinate this amateur athletic event. Further, our City
staff is totally committed to insure that all aspects of
the various events would be well organized. The community,
too, would again welcome the opportunity to share the out-
standing facilities our area has to offer to the partici-
pants and spectators expected to attend.
Again, be assured that as the City Manager of the City of
StocAton, I strongly endorse the Police Department's en-
dPaYr t hist this prestigious event in our City.
f
ALA N. HARV
CITY MANAGE
ANH:saw
Mayor Werner -2- March 4, 1991
For your reference, included are copies of endorsements and support
from previous host agencies' bid packages. Your letter will be an
integral part of our proposal to the California Police Athletic
Federation.
Please forward your letter to our Committee office, located at 441
Bauchet Street, Room 1014, Los Angeles, California 90012. Once
again, we thank you for your time and support.
Sincerely,
SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF
Michael E. Graham, Commander
Custody Division
i
Events
promote
business
By SUSAN TOWERS
cRaor d= sten writer
Bakersfield's business community
has been in high gear for months in
anticipation of the thousands of visitors
expected to arrive in the city for the
22nd annual -California Police Olympics.
Waldo Sound Designs and AutoGraph-
Ics of California, two Bakersfield firms,
-have embroidered and silk-screened
thousands of pieces of souvenir clothing
to be sold at booths at the Red Lion Inn. i
"We've been working on this for two
years," Wanda Waldo said.
T-shirts, golf shirts, tank tops, hats,
baseball caps and visors will be sold
from stalls at the Red Lion.
Other items, like piggy banks, clocks,
belt • buckles and lapel pins, many of
which have been brought to Bakersfield .
by out-of-town businesses, also will be
sold throughout the week at tVe same
location.. •
Many vendors have paid the Police
Olympics committee a flat fee to rent
the stalls. However, most of the pro-
ceeds from sales of clothing carrying the
Police Olympics insignia will go to the
committee to fund the event.
The Red Lion Inn has turned away
weddings, luncheons and business meet-
ings for months just to keep the conven-
tion rooms available for Police Olympics
events, Sales Director Julia Barrett
said.
Restaurants around town, like Siz-
zler, have stocked up with extra supplies
and put their employees on full sched-
ules.
"We expect to be busy. We've heard
the participants will be coming with
their families and we are a family
restaurant," said Meg Clay, who owns
the four Bakersfield Sizzler stores with
her husband, Wayne.
Valley Plaza Shopping Center has set
up special events, and retailers there
have bought extra advertising hoping to
attract participants and their families.
"Everyone Is excited," said Pete
Ramirez, general manager for the mall.
"And for us it was perfect timing
because we were all geared up for the
opening of our new wing."
Please turn to OLYMPICS / D2
LC OGING: Inns booked up. for athletes
Con*lnued from D1. _
The Convention Bureau will have an information
booth In the lobby.
The Red Lion also will be the scene of one
competition. The arra-wrestling event is sched-
uled in the lobby. '
Barrett says it is the largest event the Red
Lion has ever hosted. "Most fu 4w6se conven-
tions are over a two- or dwee-day span." she
said.
The management anticipates about 2,000
"room night" rentals during the event.
Barrett has been participating in the lobbying
effort to bring the Police Olympics to Bakers•
field, attending the .games and meeting with the
California Police Athletic Foundation officers.
"I think. probably the biggest market for
Bakersfield is the institutional convention cir-
cuit," Barnett said.
Mitar.L+Ci�3fiM:xugrti:">trt;Mrny,,M�it3:��9it?:kJ89:f4:►�:!:!i*ul��np?•:3�isi�!u�A3:ti?'��'�'b�f�*Sfl�s!a�'Ri�!:�h'i`Atrt;- ntse
FEUX ADAMO I Californian at* tf
Wanda Waldo's Bakersfield company has been working nonstop to embroider clothing: 6r1116.Olympics
Police athletes to fill are a- s hotels
By JOE D. STEVENSON Reservations are coming in from an 000 to 20,004 people during the one-week
Rusirten editor parts of the state,
she said. event.
About 5,300 Police Olympics coTpeti- The lodging list included motels in "Fortunately, they will come and go
tors and their rooters start arriving in Porterville and Lake Isabella. Archery, for the various events and won't all be
Bakersfield today, but the Bakersfield sail boarding and sailing events will be here at the same time," she said.
Convention Bureau and local innkeepers held at Lake Isabella. Host hotel for the Police Olympics is
have been busy for Weeks making sure Some participants will be arriving in the 262 -room Red Lion Inn. Sales Direc-
they will have a place to sleep, recreational vehicles. Reservations have for Julia Barrett said the Red Lion is
Inns and motels are booked almost to been accepted for Kern River- Park donating about $35,000 worth of lodging.
capacity for the next eight days, the Campgrounds. Some participants will It will house the organizers of the event
Convention Bureau's Jackie Belluornini park their RVs at Kern County Fair -
and has been providing rooms for Police
said. grounds, scene of the equestrian events. Olympics officials during their visits
Every registered competitor was There even will be some people stay- here to make preliminary arrange -
mailed a packet listing hotels, motels ing in the dormitories at Cal State Ments.
and inns and the - Price ranges. Bel- Bakersfield and Bakersfield College. one room has been set aside for
luominf said every9 from the budget "We were sort of surprised that some posting events and another room will
motels to the In expensive inns are chose the dormitories, but then they cost
getting part of the action. a lot less," Belluomini said. serve as the financial center. Police
Athletes were asked to send their She said there are slightly more than ' Olympics competitors have been offered
reservation requests and checks to the 3,000 rooms in the Bakersfield area. a lower convention rate.
Convention Bureau, which is acting as a Including athletes and their families, �hagnastyls Big Play Cafe will be
clearing house. friends and supporters, she expects 15,- Please tam to LODGING / D2
OLYMPICS: Businesses reach high gear
Continued from DI
videotaping many of the sports events and will
be airing them all.week on several of its 47 video
screens, according to an employee. - -
While businesses hope to cash In on -the
estimated $.5 million in Police Olympics revenue;:
the sense of community spirit has, impressed
event organizers.
"It doesn't seem as if businesses are just
trying to make a fast buck," said Betty Shaney-.
felt, a senior deputy with the Kern County
Sheriff's Department and an event director.
"Weare overwhelmed at what people have
been doing to help."
Pepsi and Burger King will be supplying
volunteers with free - food, soft drinks- and • T-
shirts, said Terry Arnold, who owns the nine
Burger Kings -in Bakersfield with her husband,
Orlen.
"We also will be donating the proceeds from
the sale of the ALF dolls to the committee," she
said.
Burger King will be selling.• Pepsi in Police
Olympics souvenir cups, with 25 cents from each
sale going to help pay. event costs.
. Medvin do Bainargeon, a Bakersfield advertis-
ck
wesPProdductions GGand TB EnterkV ta nment Pro-
duction in creating a free, statewide television
and radio advertising campaign. -
- "Several of our -clients are involved as
sponsors," said Donald Baillargeon, a partner in
the advertising firm. "There's a real sense of
comrnumpnt. Many hope that if it (Olympics) is
a success, that success will open the doors. for
more conventions to come to Bakersfield."
Many businesses have contributed without the
expectation of a cash return, Shaneyfelt said.
"For example, anonymous donation's have
been made by small oil producers," she said.
"One company gave Its -employees the choice to'
either work a day or act as volunteers for us."
CO2 o
_o m
CD
m. o �
a y O J,
Soon oea'+' m•'oo O7 17
o
m �mm o' Z
'W- mmeN z
G
o a. co ( n. o
=M O•'7
CD N �^
Q p A E
i1OF..QQ
m
to nb y as'.'e A y a�
bSFbco d
Oq m Q 0 Om
j'j fA
m wy CD 0 VA
o o A CLm
�Caco `F�eaR 'E
�D
mn%in�.�m�QC7m5A_
?erenrntrt5m Ktsmrr, r `�'v a a,a _
to
opo
C��Cb ��.`�A ��jwb%a0
am
�CD
5 mg- �rCl ra=0A y
o m m 9
►+ao $^bt1�m
x• a.' n OQ 0 m c •e
CD (d
b C'b y sn ?7 n• O b
b- 'm�'Oo m
�yuq o Win' m
�i m m� v•^•
CIO =a Gd tea.
� y y
s R��
a�
as<m
y
oSca.a
Barg
tv 0its
�o�
14A
Ob
0 2 0� CD
d gT'�,O�j--•
A
C5 C
07 Q
n•
CD
%_0
3
0__
n
SCD
cr
a
Ol
O
O
CD
CD0
0
O
(3
s •-
ki'1fibkK2lMi:ftsa�A:'�frS3htii�rtk►Aw�»�!�::
Ch
m
m
Z
v_
z
Q
NoO
l<
_�
n
r,;:h?>3�RaAT:'�^ti��naodii�tilJi+,�rt9fi!t�?ih?g'�tz.�>1e�3�tiitie
Q)
AGENDA NO. /a
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 12, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Sid Jalal Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: PATHFINDER BRIDGE PROJECT CITY -COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Construction of the Pathfinder Bridge Project which is entirely within the
jurisdiction of the City of Diamond Bar includes resurfacing and reconstruc-
ting the roadway pavement, constructing curb, gutter, sidewalk, alley
intersections, raised medians and wheelchair access ramps, modifying cross
gutter, and upgrading traffic signals along Pathfinder Road from 1,300 feet
west of Brea Canyon Road/Fern Hollow Drive to Brea Canyon Road/Fern Hollow
Drive. In addition, the work also include constructing a park-and-ride lot
in the northeast quadrant of the interchange.
DISCUSSION
Since the City's remaining available Federal -aid Urban (FAU) funds are
scheduled to lapse on April 1, 1991, it is important that we obligate the
City's remaining available FAU funds before the deadline. The enclosed
agreement provides for the County to perform the preliminary engineering at
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number:
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source: N/A
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
(Narrative continued on next page)
------------------------------ -
Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Bela er
City Attorney Assistant City Ma ager
PATHFINDER BRIDGE PROJECT
March 19, 1991
Page two
County expense and administer the project under the FAU program. As you
know, the State of California (Caltrans) has agreed to contribute a maximum
amount of $300,000 toward the construction cost of roadway and bridge im-
provements. Under the terms of the agreement, the City is to assign to the
County all of its available FAU funds and Regional FAU funds, currently
estimated to be $818,000, to finance a portion of the construction cost of
the project. We will process a separate agreement with the County covering
the remaining construction cost of the project, including the park-and-ride
lot.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement and authorize
the City Clerk to submit it to the County upon its execution by the City.
AGENDA NO. ��
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 12, 1991
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO:
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City
Council
VIA:
Robert L. Van Nort,
City Manager
r--
FROM:
Sid Jalal Mousavi,
City Engineer/Public
Works Director
SUBJECT:
EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION
A FUNDS
BACKGROUND
The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) permits cities to
exchange their Proposition A funds between cities in Los Angeles County,
provided each City identifies a need for such exchange. The attached
resolution was developed by the LACTC to accommodate such an exchange.
DISCUSSION
The City of Commerce has expressed interest in exchanging their general fund
monies for to $500,000 of Proposition A funds. The proposed exchange rate is
$.060 of unrestricted general fund monies for $1.00 in Proposition A funds.
This rate is a fair market rate for exchange of this type and amount. The
proposed exchange of City of Diamond Proposition A funds does not impact our
transit needs.
(Narrative continued on next page)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number:
Deficit: $ N/A
*RevenueSourc N/A
. Van Nort
City Manager
Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belange
City Attorney Assistant City Manager
PROPOSITION A FUNDS
March 19, 1991
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
authorizing an exchange of Proposition A funds for unrestricted general funds
with the City of Commerce and authorize the City Manager to execute the
necessary documents with the City of Commerce and LACTC.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING
THE EXCHANGE OF PROPOSITION (A LOCAL RETURN TRANSIT
FUNDS) FOR THE CITY OF COMMERCE GENERAL FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar wishes to transfer
$500,000 of its uncommitted Proposition A Local Return transit
funds to the City of Commerce for use in regional ridesharing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Commerce offered to transfer
$300,000 of their General funds to the City of Diamond Bar; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the transit
needs of the City can be adequately met if this fund trade is
approved; and
WHEREAS, the City plan to expend these funds to augment
the City's capabilities in meeting the general public's needs and
other City expenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The transfer of $500,000 of Proposition A
Local Return funds in exchange for the transfer of $300,000 of
General funds is authorized and approved.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute on
behalf of the City any required documents to effectuate this
exchange of funds.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of
this resolution and send certified copies to the City of Commerce.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED ON
MAYOR
1
, 1991.
I �'
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Tseday Aberra, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Free Flag -Cleaning Service
DATE: March 5, 1991
On February 21, 1991, Councilmember Kim requested a Certificate of
Recognition for Diamond Bar Cleaners. Owned by John Park, Diamond
Bar Cleaners, has offered its service to clean flags without charge
for the past two years. It is since the Gulf War Crisis, however,
that the number of requests for cleaning increased.
The City Clerk's Office has been notified and thus far, the
presentation of the recognition is scheduled for the March 19, 1991
City Council Meeting.
150 West Alosta Avenue, Glendora, California 91740
Phone 818-335-0231 Ext. 441 Fax 818-335-1898
February 21, 1991
Fellow American:
OPERATION DESERT HOME began as a military Mom's heartfelt idea that gained
overwhelming community support and political endorsement. Now after only a few short
weeks this dream has become a nationwide grassroots effort to ensure that America's
servicemen and women fighting in Operation Desert Storm have the homecoming they
deserve.
Glendora Community Hospital generously donated an office, furnishings, telephone lines
and other essentials to establish a national headquarters. Others have contributed a fax
machine, copy machine, typewriters, telephones and a computer. These gifts have made
it possible for OPERATION DESERT HOME to begin operation.
Citizens from across the nation can now call the national headquarters of OPERATION
DESERT HOME to gain assistance in planning a homecoming for their local soldiers.
As in all endeavors, financial support is essential. On March 9, 1991, the Los Angeles
Airport Hilton will host a banquet, "A Movement in History," to raise funds to finance
homecomings nationwide. The Honorable Congressman David Dreier and the Honorable
Supervisor Mike Antonovich will serve as Dinner Co -Chairs. Mark your calendar. A
donation of $200 per plate is requested. As this will be a media event and a great
response is expected, you are welcome to RSVP in advance of receiving your formal
invitation, to assure confirmation of your reservation.
See you there!!
Sincerely,
ebecca Venegas
President & Founder
/l h
and urges all Glendora citizens to join in supporting this movement. the Glendnra
Cilg Council does further urge that all Glendora citizens display yellow ribbons
and the American flag as uisnal evidence of their support.
IN WIVNE,; WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mg hand and caused the Seal of the Citi;
of Glendnra to be affixed th_s 1st day of Fehruaru, 1991.
CIT9 OF GLENDORA
�$II'Klllt�,/ill OR
Carry enn, Mayor Pro teem
Dav Bndler, Councilmemher
Mn u MacLeod, Councilmemher ;
rshall Mouw, Councilmember !
l
1
uflr {ilalor of t1p 0itti of Crut)vra
-�-Ptatr of Talifltrllia
WHEREAS,
nn Januaru 15, 1991, the United Sbabcs and its Allies
entered intra war with Iraq in n nler to assist in liheratiuB
Knwait from Iraqi leader, iaddam Ilussein; and
WHEREAS,
as our llnited $bat£s soldiers continue bra fight the war
in the Persian Gulf, all armu of citizens have collected
to shnu+ their support of these troops; and
WHERFAS,
this grnnp of citizens, fnunded by Rebecca ;)enegas (If
Glendnra, California, has initiated a new movement called
"Oper,tinn Desert Unme"; and
WHEREA},
many returning Vietnam veterans, after serving in an
unpopular war, were not treated with the gratitude and
respect thea deserved and, in fact, were treated poorly
by a pnrtan of the American society; and
WHEREAS,
the purpose of Operation Desert home is to ensure that
returning veterans of the Persian Gnif war receive a warm
welcome home and the assurance that thell have been suppnrbed
by 1lnited '�tabcs citizens while they served their country
on stir ltehalf.
NOW, LrNEREFORE,
I, Bab fiuhtt, as lliagnr of the Citg of Glendora, California, do
herebu proclaim
that tate Glendora Ciby Cnuncil whalehearteOl>1 supports
OPERACION DESERE NOME
and urges all Glendora citizens to join in supporting this movement. the Glendnra
Cilg Council does further urge that all Glendora citizens display yellow ribbons
and the American flag as uisnal evidence of their support.
IN WIVNE,; WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mg hand and caused the Seal of the Citi;
of Glendnra to be affixed th_s 1st day of Fehruaru, 1991.
CIT9 OF GLENDORA
�$II'Klllt�,/ill OR
Carry enn, Mayor Pro teem
Dav Bndler, Councilmemher
Mn u MacLeod, Councilmemher ;
rshall Mouw, Councilmember !
10
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEMBERS OPTHE BOARD
SCHAARUM
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PETERF KENNNETHETH HAHNHN
383 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90012
CAL/FORN�p EDMUND D. EDELMAN
DEANE DANA
MICHAEL D ANTONOVICH
LARRY J. MONTEILH, EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(213) 974-1411
March 7, 1991
The Honorable Gary H. Werner
Mayor
City of Diamond Bar
21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Dear Mayor Werner:
At its meeting held March 5, 1991, on motion of
Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, the Los Angeles
County Board of Supervisors proclaimed the week of
April 1 through 7, 1991, as "Public Health Week '91,11
throughout Los Angeles County and requested your
support in increasing the awareness and understanding
of public health.
Enclosed is a copy of the Minute Order detailing this
action.
Very truly yours,
LARRYJ M EILH
EXECUT E FILER
lo -TM -7. Ll
Enclosure
58
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Larry J. Monteilh, Executive Officer
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
383 Hall of Administration
Los Angeles, California 90012
Supervisor Antonovich made the following statement:
"'Working Together for a Healthier Tomorrow' is
the theme of the Fourth Annual Public Health Week
in Los Angeles County to be held April 1
through 7, 1991. All area residents are invited
to attend free lectures at the California Museum
of Science and Industry and take part in the Open
House and outreach activities that will be taking
place at over 40 Department of Health Services'
sites throughout the County.
"The purpose of Public Health Week is to
increase the awareness and understanding of public
health and the efforts of the Department of Health
Services. The week will also be a celebration and
recognition of the many agency partnerships we
have established in support of public health.
Public Health Week is sponsored by the Department
of Health Services' Public Health Programs and
Services organization, in collaboration with the
California Museum of Science and Industry and
several major community agencies."
Therefore, on motion of Supervisor Antonovich, seconded by
Supervisor Dana, unanimously carried, the Board proclaimed the
week of April 1 through 7, 1991, as "Public Health Week 191,"
throughout Los Angeles County.
(Continued on Page 2)
- 1 -
March 5, 1991
Syn. 58 (Continued)
In addition, the Executive Officer
to notify the Governor and the Mayors
Los Angeles County of the proclamation
10305-5.min
- 2 -
March 5, 1991
of the Board was instructed
of all the Cities within
and request their support.
AGENDA NO. /�
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 15, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: City Manager
FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, Assistant City Manager via:
Kellee A. Fritzal, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Second Birthday Celebration Update
BACKGROUND:
On April 13, 1991 the City Council has scheduled a celebration of the second
birthday of the City of Diamond Bar. A committee of community individuals have
been meeting to plan the day's events. The event will be held at the Diamond Bar
High School. The schedule is:
7:00
a.m.
- 9:30
a.m.
1K/5K/10K run/walk
8:00
a.m.
- 4:00
p.m.
Softball Tournament
11:00
a.m.
- 11:30
a.m.
Welcoming Ceremonies
11:30
a.m.
- Noon
Welcome Home Troops, Flag Ceremony
11:00
a.m.
- 4:00
p.m.
Emergency Preparedness Fair
11:00
a.m.
- 4:00
p.m.
Business Expo
Noon
- 4:00
p.m.
Entertainment/Activities
1:00 p.m. -
1:30 p.m.
Cake Cutting/Presentations
DISCUSSION:
The County of Los Angeles is hosting a Emergency Preparedness Exposition that
includes approximately 14 booths, with sheriff and fire vehicles and the
helicopters they use in emergencies. The County has indicated that they will have
the displays at the Diamond Bar birthday celebration as a portion of the day's
events.
(Narrative continued on next page if necessary)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
-,/�� ---- - — —------------------ -----
pc 9ger
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. BelaCity Manager City Attorney Assistant CitM
AGENDA NO. /?
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 15, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Sid Jalal Mousavi, City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: CONTRACT ENGINEERING SERVICES
BACKGROUND
Staff, at the City Council meeting of March 5, 1991, requested authorization
to award traffic engineering service contract to DKS Associates and Warren
Siecke Transportation and Traffic Engineering. The City Council reviewed the
reports and requested additional information, specifically in areas of budget
and expenditures as it relates to the engineering services contract.
DISCUSSION
In June 1991, the City Council adopted the FY 1990-91 Budget and allocated
$150,000 for engineering services contracts. Of the $150,000, $75,000 was
for general engineering and $75,000 for traffic engineering. At that time
both general engineering and traffic engineering services were being provided
by Ron Kranzer and Associates (RKA).
RKA's monthly retainer fee was $6,000 a month and that generally covered
RKA's cost, overhead, and profit for having a full-time technician to handle
(Narrative continued on next page)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $
Budgeted Amount $
In Account Number:
Deficit: $
Revenue Source:
L7
Ir
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Terrence L. Belang
City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager
CONTRACT ENGINEERING SERVICES
March 19, 1991
Page two
the City's engineering counter at City Hall and it also paid for RKA's staff
to be available one day a week by appointment only at City Hall. RKA also
attended Council meetings and any other meetings that they could provide
consultation. RKA's charges for other services within the first six months
of fiscal year 1990-91 (July through December 1990) has been as follows:
1. Retainer $36,000.00
2. General engineering 86,657.71
3. Inspection 11,300.50
4. Plan check 12,456.27
total $146,414.48
The amount of $146,414.48 was paid from the allocated $150,000 budget. This
account's balance in January 1991 was $3,585.52. Therefore, the City
Council, as part of the mid -year budget amendment, authorized additional
$65,000 to be allocated to this account.
Within this six-month period, in addition to these payments, the City also
paid RKA the following fees. These fees were not charged to the City's
General Fund.
1. Grand Avenue Improvements $51,679.57
2. Chino Hills Parkway Improvements 7,120.30
3. Signal at Diamond Bar Boulevard/
Kiowa Crest 454.50
4. Slurry Seal Program 8,714.08
5. Signal at Golden Springs/Sunset
Crossing 3,856.34
6. Landscaping Assessment Districts 101.88
total $71,926.67
Therefore, the RKA's total charges for six months was $218,341.15 with an
average of $36,390.19 per month.
As it can be noted upon City Council's approval of the budget amendment, the
engineering contract service account had a balance of $50,493,41. Since
then, for the services that RKA has provided, staff has processed the
following payments for the months of January and February 1991.
1. General Engineering (General Fund) $14,657.11
2. Inspection 1,808.00
3. Plan Check 1,627.00
4. Grand Avenue Improvements 1,646.57
Upon establishment of the City's Engineering/Public Works Department, the
City amended the RKA's contract and eliminated the $6,000 retainer fee.
Staff also assumed additional responsibilities and further reduced the
AGENDA NO.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 1, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: James DeStefano, Director of Planni
QN*_P
SUBJECT: TTM 47722/EIR 91-1 A request to allow for a subdivision of an existing
nineteen (19) acre parcel into thirteen (13) residential lots, and re-
view of an Environmental Impact Report.
Owner/Applicant: Piermarini Enterprises, Inc.
2100 South Reservoir
Pomona, CA 91766
(714) 590-4809
INTRODUCTION:
This application is for the approval of a tentative tract map to develop thir-
teen (13) custom single family homes on a 19.08 acre site located within "The
Country" on Derringer Lane. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been pre-
pared which describes the impacts the proposed development may cause to the en-
vironment and mitigation measures to those impacts. The project applicant is
Mr. Frank Piermarini.
This application for approval of TTM 47722 and EIR 91-1 is before the City Coun-
cil as required by Ordinance No. 25, (1990). Pursuant to the Ordinance the
Planning Commission serves as an advisory agency to the Council on most land
subdivisions. The subdivision is accompanied by the EIR which must also be re-
viewed by the Council.
Narrative continued on next page.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source:
REVIEWED BY:
r
Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski
City Manager City Attorney
rrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manag
AGENDA ITEM
March 19, 1991
Page Two
This proposed project is the first hillside subdivision to be submitted and re-
viewed as a result of the new Hillside Development Ordinance. The hillside or-
dinance outlines strict criteria for development including landform grading,
landscaping/re-vegetation techniques, house siting and other design standards.
HISTORY:
A proposal for the development of this site was submitted to the County of Los
Angeles in August of 1989. The County was, at that time, providing development
processing services under contract with the City. The preparation of an EIR was
determined necessary in late 1989. The project under review and analysis was
proposed as a sixteen (16) unit subdivision on the 19.08 acre site requiring
mass grading and the removal of ten (10) mature oak trees. (CUP/OT 89-338)
The City Planning Commission reviewed the original, sixteen (16) unit, project
in September and October of 1990. The Commission denied the project, without
prejudice, on October 22, 1990.
The City Council adopted new Interim Hillside Development Standards on Oct. 16,
1990; and modified the regulations on November 13, 1990.
The applicant revised the original submittal to mitigate the site planning,
grading and environmental concerns expressed by the staff and Commission. An
alternative thirteen (13) unit design was presented which responded to the is-
sues and reflects the standards and guidelines of the hillside ordinance. The
new project is the focus of this report.
STAFF REPORT:
A copy of the detailed staff analysis as presented to the Planning Commission on
January 28, 1991, and Minutes of the public hearing are attached.
The Planning Commission reviewed and unanimously recommended approval of the
project on January 28, 1991.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
A notice of public hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Additionally, a notice of public
hearing was mailed to approximately 130 property owners surrounding the site on
March 5, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that upon conclusion of the public
hearing, the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving EIR 91-1 and
TTM 47722 with the findings of fact and listed conditions.
JDS:pjs
Attachments
IF
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
REPORT DATE: January 24, 1991
MEETING DATE: January 28, 1991
CASE/FILE NUMBER: TT 47722/CUP 89-338/EIR 91-1
APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to allow a subdivision of
an existing 19 acre parcel into 13
residential lots, a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) for hillside management
review and review of an Environmental
Impact Report.
PROPERTY LOCATION: Northwest Corner of Derringer Lane
and Ridgeline Road
PROPERTY OWNER: Piermarini Enterprises, Inc.
2100 South Reservoir
Pomona, CA 91766
(714) 590-4809
APPLICANT: Hunsaker & Associates
10179 Huennekens Street
San Diego, CA 92121
(619) 558-4500
BACKGROUND:
This application is for the approval of a tentative tract map to devel-
op thirteen (13) single family custom homes on a nineteen acre site.
(Exhibit "A") The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for hill-
side management review. This proposed project has been substantially
revised from a previous submittal reviewed by the Planning Commission
in October, 1990. The previous submittal was for a tentative map to
develop sixteen homes on nineteen acres, a CUP for hillside management
and an Oak Tree removal permit for the destruction of ten Oak Trees.
The original submitted project was denied by the Planning Commission on
October 24, 1990.
The proposed project has been developed in conformance with statements
made by the Planning Commission and staff pertaining to the concerns
relative to the former project, as well as, responding to the environ-
mental protection of sensitive areas and hillside development, in gen-
eral, as outlined in the City's recently adopted interim hillside de-
velopment control ordinance. The proposed project has been adjusted to
meet several concerns of the City as follows:
January 28, 1991 Agenda
Page Two
1. The original density of the project has been reduced by sixteen
percent.
2. The overall grading of the project has been reduced and now con-
forms to "land form" grading concepts, as outlined within the new
Hillside Ordinance.
3. The requirement for several crib walls has been eliminated.
4. The new project configuration now saves and maintains all existing
Oak Trees on the project site.
5. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been amended in order to
respond to a variety of concerns outlined by staff at the October,
1990 public hearing, as well as provide for a thirteen unit alter-
native design which has become the preferred alternative to the
original project proposal.
APPLICATION ANALYSIS:
The project is located on a vacant nineteen acre irregularly shaped
parcel. The project is bounded by the rear property lines of existing
single family homes, fronting onto Hollow Drive, Coyote Springs Drive,
Bronze Knoll Road, Ridgeline Road with access from Derringer Lane.
The site consists of hilly terrain. A detailed slope analysis map has
been provided which indicates that the slopes range from zero percent
to over thirty-five percent. (Exhibit "C-111, AND "C-211) A thirty inch
Southern California Gas Company high pressure pipeline traverses the
southerly portion of the site.
The property is zoned R-1-10,000. The Community Plan designation is
Non -Urban Residential (one unit or less per acre). The project propos-
es thirteen units on nineteen (acres, which translates to 1.46 acres per
lot. The lots range in size from .5 gross acres to 3.4 gross acres.
The lots proposed will be developed with pads that range from .28 acres
to .48 acres in size. These building pads will be developed with sin-
gle family residential structures which will range in size from approx-
imately five thousand to ten thousand square feet. Exhibit "D" illus-
trates the proposed building envelopes on each pad for purposes of
house siting. Parcels 2, 3, and 4 have been developed with a "stepped"
pad in order to reduce the bulk of the home and break up the building
mass.
To complete the project, under its current design, approximately
170,000 cubic yards of earth will be disturbed as a result of on-site
grading. The quantity of grading necessary has been reduced with the
lower density project now before the Planning Commission. The project
now incorporates land form grading, which provides for a variety of
January 28, 1991 Agenda
Page Three
slope percentages and slope direction, in an undulating pattern which
is similar to existing adjacent terrain. Grading plans indicate a bal-
anced cut and fill of the site. No import or export of material will
be required, other than the exportation of some of the natural grasses
on the site. Hard edges, which would have been left by the previous
cut and fill proposal, will now be given a rounded appearance that more
closely resembles the adjacent natural contours. The reduction of grad-
ing not only respects the natural terrain, but minimizes grading to the
extent that all Oak Trees on the site will now be preserved. Slopes
throughout the project site will have variable ratios from 1.5:1 to
approximately 3.5:1. The grading concept, as proposed, closely re-
flects the philosophy and policies within the Interim Hillside Develop-
ment Standards, which were adopted by the City Council in November,
1990.
In addition to Oak Tree preservation, the conceptual landscape plan now
indicates that approximately four hundred additional trees will be
planted on the site. The trees to be planted will vary in size through-
out the project, utilizing a format that would provide for a mixture of
species type and size. (Exhibit "F") The conceptual landscape plan
illustrates the approximate location and massing of the landscaping
materials.
The project is served by a single cul-de-sac street which extends ap-
proximately fourteen hundred feet from the intersection of Derringer
Lane . The slope of the street ranges from one percent to fifteen per-
cent (1%-15%). At the terminus of the cul-de-sac, a driveway of ap-
proximately three hundred feet has been created to service Lot Eight.
In addition, a secondary fire access is now provided from the driveway
adjacent to Lot Eight, extending through to Bronze Knoll Road.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared for the
proposed project. The applicant selected and retained the firm of D.
G. King Associates, as its environmental consultant, and the DEIR was
prepared by D. G. King Associates. The DEIR assesses the potential
physical environmental impacts associated with the sixteen unit resi-
dential hillside development project as original proposed, as well as
several alternative projects to the original proposal. The thirteen
unit project discussed previously is one of the alternatives described
within the EIR. The thirteen unit alternative reduces the affects on
the environment, specifically, by reducing the amount of grading re-
quired for the project, as well as retain the existing Oak Trees on the
site. The revised project also reduces the number of dwelling units
by approximately sixteen percent. However, that in itself is not
deemed to be a significant affect, with respect to lessening the im-
pacts on the environment.
In accordance with § 15164 of the Administrative Code, staff considers
the changes contained within the revised EIR to constitute an Addendum
to the DEIR. Several minor corrections have been made within the EIR;
January 28, 1991 Agenda
Page Four
the most significant of which is the addition of the thirteen unit al-
ternative project which has become the preferred alternative for pur-
poses of environmental review.
To initiate the environmental review process, the City staff prepared
an initial study, which is a checklist that establishes the technical
focus of the DEIR, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared to inform
selected agencies of the project and to solicit their comments or con-
cerns. Those comments or concerns have been incorporated and responded
to within the DEIR. The Draft Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared and submitted to the City for review. A Notice of Completion
(NOC) and availability of the DEIR was given to all organizations and
individuals who had previously requested it.
The effect upon the environment must be taken into account when consid-
ering any specific development project such as the application present-
ly before the Commission. The California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) states that public agencies should not approve projects proposed
if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures that
would lessen the significant measures upon the environment. In Octo-
ber, 1990, the City Planning Commission reviewed a sixteen unit propos-
al and concluded that the project was not appropriate for the site.
Since that time, staff has worked with the developer and his new engi-
neering consultant toward the creation of an alternative project that
mitigates the impacts to the environment and surrounding properties,
meets the hillside development standards contained within our recently
adopted ordinance, and provides for an overall improvement to the sub-
division design.
The DEIR was revised .to identify the environmental impacts related to
geology, topography, hydrology, biological resources, aesthetics, fire
protection and other issues. Grading has been reduced from approxi-
mately 204,000 cubic yards of earth material to the most recent esti-
mate of 170,000 cubic yards.
The majority of crib walls have been eliminated, with the exception of
a necessary crib wall, adjacent to the entry driveway to the project.
Additionally, a crib wall is proposed near the most northerly corner of
the project adjacent two homes on Coyote Springs. This second crib
wall may be eliminated, subject to successful negotiation between the
applicant and the adjacent property owners, toward development of a
drainage system that eliminates the need for the crib wall. An alter-
native proposed, not only eliminates the crib wall, but extends the
rear yard area of three homes facing Coyote Springs.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report presented to the Planning Commis-
sion in October, 1990, contained a significant number of supplemental
and/or revised pages, including a variety of changes submitted in the
month prior to public hearing. Attached to this new proposal is a re-
vised DEIR with all corrections provided in revised pages, prepared by
the environmental consultant. Alternate project designs have now been
January 28, 1991 Agenda
Page Five
explored in terms of further reducing the impacts associated with the
original project, and from that exploration has evolved a thirteen unit
project, which is preferred by the staff over the original sixteen unit
proposal.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
A notice of public hearing was
owners surrounding the site, o
tice of this public hearing was
Tribune and the Inland Valley
1991.
CONCLUSION:
mailed to approximately 130 property
n January 18, 1991. Additionally, a no -
published within the San Gabriel Valley
Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 7,
In the opinion of staff, the project has significantly improved from
the prior submittal. Staff feels that the proposed project now con-
forms with the philosophy of the Hillside Ordinance and is appropriate-
ly designed for the site. We believe the proposed project mitigates
the concerns of the previous submittal and is compatible with the sur-
rounding residential community and physical environment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Reso-
lution which approves the Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-1), CUP
89-338 for hillside management review and Tentative Tract Map 47722,
with the following finding of fact, and the listed conditions.
Findings of Fact (to support recommendations):
I
1. The Planning Commission finds the Environmental Impact Report has
been completed in compliance with CEQA and that the Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained within the Envi-
ronmental Impact Report.
2. The Planning Commission finds that changes or alterations have
been incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the
significant environmental impacts as identified within the EIR.
3. The proposed project is compatible with the natural scenic and
open space resources of the area.
4. The proposed development demonstrates creative and imaginative
design resulting in a complementary visual quality, which will
benefit current and future community residents.
January 28, 1991 Agenda
Page Six
5. The proposed map and improvements of the proposed subdivision are
consistent with the Community Plan and policies as set forth with
the Hillside Ordinance.
6. The site is physically suited for the proposed thirteen unit sub-
division and development.
JDS:pjs
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Tract Map
Exhibit B - Sections
Exhibit C-1 - Slope Analysis
Exhibit C-2 - Slope Analysis
Exhibit D - Building Envelope
Exhibit E - Land Use Map
Exhibit F - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit G - Radius Map
Exhibit H - CAD Perspective Drawing
Exhibit I - CAD Perspective Drawing
Revised EIR, dated 1-18-91
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Pages dated January 23, 1991
Resolution of Approval
January 28, 1991 Page 5
CU with Mr. Kaplan, more extensively.
Ff'-1
Jame DeStefano specified the memo was prepay
from he discussion, of the last meeting, n
rd
regato signs adjacent to the freeways. If he
philoso y of the memorandum is accepted, it ould
be turne into strict standards to be put in o the
final ordi ance. The CUP process discusse in the
memo does of apply itself to the issu s being
discussed i regards to the Church situa on.
Chair/Schey n ted the Commission does of seem to
have any oppos tion to the various c nges made to
the text of the rdinance. The main ssue seems to
be if freeway si ns should be gra ed the ability
to be approved t rough a CUP an , if, in certain
types and catego\ies of sign the Commission
should allow a CUPcess to implemented. The
Commission needs tcide wh particular type of
signs should be reed and r the CUP process.
C/MacBride stated he category of Civic
Organizations and Insti ional signs should be in
the parameters of the C
C/Grothe would li m nument signs to be
considered. He als stated there ought to be more
flexibility in re rds to a square footage of
signs in relation/ o larger b ildings.
Motion was mXde by C/MacB 'de, seconded by
VC/Harmony an CARRIED UNANIMOUS Y to direct staff
to implement the changes in the
text that were
lined in p suant to the last hea ing; arrange a
hearing th Mr. Kaplan could atten to discuss his
memorandu ; look into the potential implementation
of the UPOprocess and what standa ds it might
requir for insertion into the four (4 categories
outli d: 1. freeway signs. 2. civic
orga zations and institutions. 3. monum nt signs.
4. igns on buildings over three (3) sto 'es; and
to continue the hearing to the next mee ing of
F ruary 11, 1991.
TT 47722/ Staff reported the application is for the approval
CUP 89-338/ of a tentative tract map to develop thirteen (13)
EIR 91-1 single family custom homes on a nineteen acre site.
The previous submittal was for a tentative map to
develop sixteen homes on the same nineteen acres.
The original submitted project was denied without
prejudice by the Planning Commission on October 24,
1990. Since that time, the developer has worked
very hard with the City staff towards the creation
of the project that is before the Commission. The
proposed project has been adjusted to meet several
January 28, 1991
Page 6
concerns of the City as follows:
1. It has a substantial adherence to "land form"
grading..
2. It saves all existing oak trees.
3. The original project density has been reduced
by sixteen percent.
4. The overall grading has been reduced from
about 204,000 cubic yards to about 170,000
cubic yards of dirt movement.
5. The bulk of the crib walls on the perimeters
of the project have been removed with the
exception of a crib wall necessary at the
drive entrance adjacent to Derringer Lane, and
another crib wall that may be required for the
drainage debris basin at the most northerly
portion of the site.
6. The relocation of the gas line has been
diminished as well as the subsequent earth
movements.
7. The proposed lots will range from 1/2 acre to
3.4 acres. The average lot size is one and
half acres. The pads of each of the lots will
range from .2 acres to .4 acres in size. The
homes proposed to be constructed are in the
range of about 5,000 to 10,000 square feet.
8. The developer has located the developable
building envelops of the specific pads. This
allows siting on the homes so they are not as
massive from afar, and allows review on an
independent basis for conformance with that
building envelop.
9. Hunsaker and Assoc. was the engineer hired by
the applicant and Horste Schor was suggested
to the applicant to consult with by the City
staff.
10. The project now incorporates a much softer
concept of development with one long cul-de-
sac reduced 250 feet from the previous
proposal. A secondary emergency fire access
from lot 8 through to Bronze Knoll Road has
been added.
11. After all the grading, the terrain is put back
into a configuration that respects the natural
environment.
12. The landscape plan incorporates revegetation,
whereby the vegetation will be species from
within the general environment, as well as
species new to the environment but very
compatible. More trees will be incorporated
than originally existed.
13. The EIR concerns have been mitigated as far as
staff is concerned. The blue line stream is
indeed off the site.
James DeStefano stated, in regards to the project's
January 28, 1991
Page 7
appearance from afar, the developer submitted a
computer enhanced graphic image of the project,
including three (3) sets of slides, in graphic
illustration, showing the existing setting, and the
proposed project from afar. James DeStefano
presented the slides to the Commission.
James DeStefano stated, in staff's opinion, the
project has been significantly improved from the
prior submittal. Staff feels that the proposed
project now conforms with the philosophy of the
Hillside Ordinance and is appropriately designed
for the site. Staff has articulated sixty (60)
conditions on different issues important to make
sure the development approval clearly expressed
what the Hillside Ordinance says, and what is
wished for future hillside subdivisions. Staff
recommended the Planning Commission adopt the
attached Resolution which approves the
Environmental Impact report (EIR 91-1), CUP 89-338
for hillside management review and Tentative Tract
Map 47722, with the attached findings of fact, and
the listed conditions.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Frank Piermarini, app]
personnel for their prof
manner. He verbally revi
concerns, as stated in tY
been mitigated. He state
color coordinated to
terrain. The landscape
each home is sold.
unlandscaped until the
The grading of offsites
three (3) talfour (4) mon
problems arise. The pl<
will be out in about two
the grading is complet
confident of conforming 1
The project will be an ei
Acant, commended staff
`essional and considerate
.ewed the list of previous
ie staff report, that have
d the custom homes will be
blend into the natural
will be maintained until
The pads will be left
completion of each home.
will take approximately
ths, assuming a minimum of
in for the entire project
and one half years after
,e. He stated he felt
:o Diamond Bar's criteria.
ihancement to the City.
Lex Williman, a planner with Hunsaker and Assoc.,
presented a map of the proposed tract. He pointed
out there are no straight lines and stated that
undulation is the key to "land form" grading.
There are variable slopes of 3 to 1, 2 to 1, 1(1/2)
to 1. The 1(1/2) to 1 are the side slopes between
the various pads which will be hidden by the units
as constructed. All of the slopes around the edge
are a minimum of 2 to 1, and some up to 3(1/2) to
1. Adjacent to the existing units, there is a
basin that a butts the Piermarini property to these
units. Two options are being proposed: 1. Fill
January 28, 1991 Page 8
the hole, connect to the drainage, eliminate any
crib wall, and come up from the slope undulating
around onto the project. 2. Leave the properties
alone, create a crib wall no higher than the
existing pads and come up from there creating an
undulating slope. He stated there is a clustering
of trees around swales to conform to natural
terrain.
Chair/Schey inquired if the applicant was
comfortable that the drainage situation is such
that if the sump is filled, the drainage could
adequately be taken away without any danger of
inundation to the rear of those homes.
Lex Williman responded the preliminary
investigation indicated there is no problem. There
has not been a complete hydrology study. There is
a storm drain existing at the bottom of the hill
which would connect into that pipe, eliminate the
catch basin, and pick the drainage up elsewhere.
The Public Hearing was declared open for those in
favor of the project.
Jack Wolf, residing on Ridgeline, commended Frank
Piermarini and his projects. He stated the Country
is willing to have his projects as part of theirs.
The hillside would remain intact and the project
would actually enhance the area.
Chair/Schey requested speakers for those in
opposition to the project.
Pat Brazer, residing at 23497 Coyote Springs,
commended the Piermarini developments but stated
the developlAent would obstruct the view from his
home. He stated the development would look like a
postage stamp on the hillside and would be at odds
with the surroundings; the crib walls are ugly; the
pads are too small for the size of the homes; the
cutting will affect the existing homes; and the
removal of the gas line can be very dangerous. He
suggested the original recommendation of two (2) or
three (3) homes would be ideal.
Dennis O'Donnell, residing at 23550 Coyote Springs,
stated his apprehension that the homes may come
down into his backyard. He is concerned about the
drainage situation and concerned about the impacts
on the natural hillside.
Claudia Huff, residing at 1641 Fire Hallow, stated
the project is fundamentally too intense. Since
there are very few hills left in Diamond Bar, this
January 28, 1991 Page 9
hillside should be well guarded. She inquired if
there will be regrading, and if so would the
existing residents be looking across space to the
crib walls. The property is zoned for two (2)
homes. The grading does not sound like a vast
improvement. She asked the Commission to
reconsider the amount of homes to be allowed in the
particular area.
Frank Piermarini responded the property is zoned R-
1-10,000, and 30 to 50 smaller homes could be built
if so desired. The pads are as big as two (2) of
the existing lots, in most cases. There will be no
visual crib walls. Trees will be planted that will
not block the view.
Chair/Schey inquired if the access for the grading
will be taken entirely off of the applicants site.
Frank Piermarini affirmed they will not be on
anyone's property, with the exception of three (3)
lots. If the owners of these lots preferred not to
see the crib walls, the lots can be flattened out
with their permission.
Chair/Schey received affirmation from Frank
Piermarini that the light green shading on the
presented map is all natural terrain.
Chair Schey inquired of City Engineer, Sid Mousavi,
if the approval of the grading plan normally
required a full geotechnical report to be done, and
if the recommendation of the report would be
implemented in the grading plan.
Sid Mousavi responded that that is the normal
process of the grading plan.
Lex Williman, in response to Chair/Schey's
concerns, stated there are a series of ditches that
have been constructed and there will be additional
ditches made for the storm drains. In response to
relocating the gas line, he stated Southern
California Gas (SCG) will do all the work. The
portion that is being relocated will be constructed
to the new line either adjacent or over the old
line while the old line is live. At some point,
they will shut down the, old line, tie in the new,
and probably slur in the abandoned line. Grading
will occur over the top of the line before it is
relocated and in the presence of representatives
from the SCG.
VC/Harmony inquired how much time will lapse from
the time it will take to complete grading and to
January 28, 1991
Page 10
landscape the slopes.
Frank Piermarini explained that grading will take
between 3(1/2) to 4 months. As soon as the grading
is completed, we will landscape all the slopes, but
not the pads. The vegetation will be growing while
we are building.
Lex Williman stated, in regards to VC/Harmony's
concern, that a preliminary hydrology study has
been done taking into consideration the
permeability of the street and the houses. In
every case it goes up three (3) to four (4) CFS,
which is very small. The additional run off can be
handled.
James DeStefano stated there is a condition within,
the document which calls for a complete hydrology
study to be submitted to the City. It would be
subjected to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
VC/Harmony stated he wants a provision to eliminate
the construction of tennis courts. He finds them
visually ugly and they tends to add more run of f
than it's permeability.
Frank Piermarini stated he would not object to a
condition of no tennis courts.
VC/Harmony noted that the grading appeared steep at
the end of the cul-de-sac. He inquired of it's
length.
Lex Williman responded that there is a vertical
curve that has a transition from the steep portion
of the street, which is 15%, down to a 3% portion
into the cul-de-sac. The grade varies within the
points.
VC/Harmony pointed out that going up steep grading
is not a problem in regards to fire access.
However, there must be sufficient turn around
points and maneuverability for the fire equipment.
Frank Piermarini stated the cul-de-sac will be
connected to the existing ones in the Country. He
pointed out there is also an additional five (5)
feet of grassy area, giving a 50 foot radius, that
will be grassed off and is driveable.
C/Grothe asserted he would like a condition stating
any home exceeding 5,000 square feet must have an
additional five (5) foot set back on each side.
January 28, 1991
Page 12
staff, to also include the amended conditions of:
#4 - to add to the beginning of the second sentence
to read "Fenced details, tree staking...". #6 - to
add ....shall be approved by the Director of
Planning as to type, orientation, and height.".
Add a new condition #23 - "Tennis courts would be
allowed, with a maximum 6 foot wall, and no
lighting. If the lot is by itself without a house
structure, the wall of the tennis court could go to
8 feet high.". Add a new condition #24 - "Dwelling
units in excess of 5,000 square feet of gross floor
area shall have minimum side yard setbacks of ten
(10) feet and fifteen (15) feet from the edge of
the property line.". In addition, crib walls
should be allowed if all reasonable efforts have
been made to implement the preferred option (either
filling the hole in the catch basin or leaving it
alone) to the satisfaction of the staff.
Ann LundX repo ed the environmental evaluation
shows at the oposed use does not have the
poten al to degra the quality of the environment
i�eingls
a long term or\ea
term. The proposed use
wot cause substadverse effects on human
either directndirectly. On the basis
of this initial stue staff finds that the
proposed project chave a significant
effect on the een and a Negative
Declaration has beeare Staff recommends
that the Planning Con app ve the Negative
Declaration and CUP8 with e Findings of
Fact and conditions
Chair/Schey called a recess at 10:10 p.m. The
meeting was called to order at 10:20 p.m.
CUP 90 128
Ann Lundu, Planning Technician, reported tha the
Automate
applicant, Video Kiosk Corporation, is requ ing a
Videomati
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to constru a fully
Kiosk
automated video kiosk in the park' g lot of
Standard Brands Paint Store. The ki k is a fully
automated video store, open 24 rs a day, and
will not contain any employees The kiosk will
occupy two (2) parking spaces. More than adequate
parking will remain for both the existing
ommercial shopping center as well as the proposed
ksk. The video kio dispenses the video by
rob t through credit rd authorization. Regular
serve e, of this kio will be done twice a week
by th owner, St dard Brands Paint. If the
computefails, message is sent directly to the
main off. a of ideo Kiosk Corporation. The main
office has ec nicians which are on duty 24 hours a
day to servi the computer.
Ann LundX repo ed the environmental evaluation
shows at the oposed use does not have the
poten al to degra the quality of the environment
i�eingls
a long term or\ea
term. The proposed use
wot cause substadverse effects on human
either directndirectly. On the basis
of this initial stue staff finds that the
proposed project chave a significant
effect on the een and a Negative
Declaration has beeare Staff recommends
that the Planning Con app ve the Negative
Declaration and CUP8 with e Findings of
Fact and conditions
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Tentative Tract No. 47722
13 Lots - 19.08 Acres
8-A. The developer will bear the cost of providing new underground conduit,
transformers, slab boxes, primary conductor and easement right-of-way.
8-B. Initial costs for the installation of phone service to the project will be provided by
the developer in anticipation of reimbursement by General Telephone (after
service is established) through various programs offered by the telephone
company.
8-C. Utility costs and disruption during construction and future repair will be minimized
through the coordination of a joint trench which houses both electrical and
telephone lines, wherever possible.
8-D. The developer will pay all costs required Sanitation District connection fees.
8-E. Adequate access for emergency vehicles and turning radius at the end of each
cul de sac will be provided.
8-F. The developer will pay school fees as may be levied by the Walnut Valley Unified
School District.
9-- A. Construction shall be suspended in the vicinity of any cultural, historical or
prehistorical resource encountered during development of the site and leave the
resource in place until a qualified archaeologist can examine the find and
determine proper method of handling the artifact for placement in an appropriate
repository.
Page 5
XHi�lfi "A
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Pg
TO: Jim DeStefano, Director of Planning
FROM: Sid Jalal Mousav' `
City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 47722
DATE: January 23, 1991
The following is a list of the Engineering Department's
conditions for approval:
1. The review of the tentative map is conducted to ensure
that the project will meet all City requirements, and,
therefore, the details and notes shown on tentative map
will be approved upon review of detail street, sewer,
grading and drainage plans, and hydrology study. .
2. The subdivider shall pay for all costs associated with
plan check, review of documents, permit and inspection,
as required by the City.
3. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's
Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
4. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Depart-
ment must be met, verified, and approved by the City
prior to recordation of the map.
5. All special assessments, utilities, sewer or storm
drain connection fees are to be paid prior to
recordation.
6. All requirements of the serving utilities are to be met
or guaranteed prior to recording the final map.
7. The Final Map shall be based on a field survey.
8. All surveying for the proposed development will be done
by the developer, including the establishment of
centerline ties.
9. Along with final map, surveyor must submit closure
sheets.
10. All improvement plans required for this development
must be submitted along with final map. Plan check of
the final map will not commence until all maps are
submitted.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 47722
January 23, 1991
Page 2
11. All improvement plans must be submitted in triplicate.
12. An 8-1/2" x 11" reduction of the final map must be
submitted along with the final map.
13. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline
prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Department
at no cost to the City. Building permits will not be
issued until the aforementioned items of the recorded
map are received by the Engineering Department.
14. If connecting to L.A. County Flood Control District
facilities., copy of all calculations and plans must be
submitted to L.A.C.F.C.D. Los Angeles County F.C.D.'s
permit is required for tie-in. A copy of this permit
must be submitted to the City prior to approval of the
grading plan.
15. Considering the slope of the street, mitigation
measures must be developed in order to minimize the
traffic hazard. All traffic improvement plans must be
approved by City Engineer prior to recordation of the
map.
16. Street or area lighting plan must be developed to
improve nighttime visibility to the satisfaction of the
City.
17. A hydrology study, along with drainage improvement
plan, will be required. These plans must be approved
by L.A.F.C.D. and the City prior to filing of the final
map.
18. Offer of easement for all utilities and drainage or
other facilities must be drawn on the final map.
19. All street names must be approved by the City prior to
recordation of final map. These names must not be
duplicated within a radius of 20 miles. House
numbering clearance is required prior to approval of
the final map. Street name signs must be provided and
installed prior to issuance of the occupancy permit.
20. A final tract map must be completely signed by the City
prior to filing with the County Recorder.
21. The central angles of the right-of-way radius returns
shall not differ by more than 10 degrees on local
streets.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 47722
January 23, 1991
Page 3
22. Any broken or damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, and
pavement on streets within or abutting the sub-
division must be repaired.
23. Driveways will not be permitted within 25 feet upstream
of any catch basins when street grades exceed 60.
24. Prior to final approval, the subdivider shall enter
into an agreement with City's franchised cable T.V.
operator to permit the installation of cable in a
common utility trench.
25. The vertical alignment shall be adjusted to provide for
a landing, where necessary, to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
26. The subdivider shall install and dedicate main line
sewers and serve each lot/parcel with a separate house
lateral or have approved and bonded sewer plans on file
with the City.
27. The subdivider shall submit an area study to the City
Engineer to determine whether capacity is available in
the sewerage system to be used as the outlet for the
sewers in this land division. If the system is found
to have insufficient capacity, the problem must be
resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
28. The subdivider shall send a print of the land division
map to the County Sanitation District, with a request
for annexation. Such annexation must be assured in
writing.
29. Off-site improvements are required to join the existing
gravity sewer in Coyote Springs Drive.
30. A preliminary soil report must be submitted and
approved prior to approval of the final map. The
report must be prepared based upon adequate test
borings or excavations, and shall (1) describe any soil
or geologic conditions(s) which, if not corrected,
might lead to structural damage or "slope failure, and
(2) recommend actions necessary to prevent structural
damage or slope failure. A soil expansion index test
is required and shall be done in accordance with the
procedures of UBC Std. No. 29-2.
31. As a means of mitigating potential environmental
impacts, the applicant shall suspend construction in
A.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING ENVIRONMEN-
TAL IMPACT REPORT 91-1 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 89-338, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47722
TO DEVELOP A THIRTEEN LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVEL-
OPMENT ON A NINETEEN ACRE SITE LOCATED WEST
OF DERRINGER LANE, NORTH OF RIDGELIKE ROAD
ADJACENT TO THE COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT, DIAMOND
BAR, CALIFORNIA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUP-
PORT THEREOF.
Recitals.
i. Piermarini Enterprises has filed an application request-
ing the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Ten-
tative Tract Map approval, and has submitted an Environ-
mental Impact Report, analyzing the above-mentioned de-
velopment project, as described in the title of this.
resolution, (the project) hereinafter
ii. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was estab-
lished as.a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California. On said date, pursuant to the re-
quirements of the California Government Code Section
57476, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County
Code contains the Development Code of the County of Los
Angeles now currently applicable to development applica-
tions, including the subject Application, within the
City of Diamond Bar.
Because of its recent incorporation, the City of Diamond
Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, ac-
tion was taken on the subject Application, as to consis-
tency to the General Plan, pursuant to the terms and
provisions of California Government Code Section 65360.
I
iv. A duly noticed public hearing on the above -referenced
application was conducted and concluded on January 28,
1991, prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
V. All legal prerequisites prior to this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
Now, therefore, it is found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Commission hereby specifically
facts set forth in the Recitals, Par
tion are true and correct.
finds that all the
Part
A, of this Resolu-
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Com-
mission during the above -referenced public hearing, in-
cluding written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. The project relates to a site which is comprised
of approximately nineteen acres of vacant hillside
land within the R-1-10,000 and R-1-40,000 zoning
district and is designated by the Community Plan
for non -urban residential development, in one unit
or less per acre. The site is generally located
west of Derringer Lane, north of Ridgeline Road,
and both east and south of The County (develop-
ment). The site consists of hilly terrain. A
slope analysis indicates that the acreage contains
slopes which range from zero to over thirty-five
percent. A thirty inch in diameter Southern Cali-
fornia Gas Company high pressure gas line travers-
es the southerly portion of the site. The appli-
cant's proposal is for a subdivision of thirteen
lots, which will range in size from .5 gross acres
to 3.4 gross acres. Building pads range in size
from .28 acres to .48 acres. The building units
planned for the pads range in size from five to
ten thousand square feet.
b. The property to the north and west of the project
site is zoned R-1-8,000 and presently is developed
with detached single family residential dwelling
units. The property to the east and south of the
project site is zoned R-1-40,000 and presently is
vacant and undeveloped.
C. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that En-
vironmental Impact Report (EIR 91-1) has been com-
pleted in compliance with the California Environ-
mental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
guidelines promulgated thereunder, and, further,
that the Planning Commission has reviewed and con-
sidered the information contained in said Environ-
mental Impact Report (EIR 91-1).
d. The Planning Commission hereby finds that changes
or alterations have been required in, or incorpo-
rated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant environmental impact thereof as
identified in said Environmental Impact Report,
Number, EIR 91-1.
e. The property is depicted within the Community
Plan, as non -urban residential. There is a rea-
sonable probability that the project, as proposed,
will be consistent with the proposed General Plan.
f. The site is physically suitable for the type- of
development being proposed as depicted within the
Exhibits and as conditioned herein.
g. The design of the subdivision and the proposed
improvements will not cause substantial environ-
mental damage or substantial avoidable injury to
wildlife or their habitat. Project impacts have
been identified within the Environmental Impact
Report and mitigation measures have been proposed
and are referenced herein.
h. The design of the subdivision and the type of im-
provements will not cause serious public health
problems.
i. The site is physically suitable for the proposed
type of density and development.
j. The design and improvements of the proposed subdi-
vision will not conflict with public easements for
access through or use of property within the pro-
posed subdivision.
k. The use applied for at the location set forth in
the application is property one for which a condi-
tional use permit is authorized by the Los Angeles
County Code.
1. The use is not detrimental to the existing uses or
to uses specifically permitted within the zone in
which the proposed use is to be located.
M. The use will be compatible with other uses in the
general area in which the use is proposed to be
located.
n. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the uses in all of the
yards, set -backs, walls, fences, landscaping and
other features required to adjust the use to the
existing or future uses permitted in the neighbor-
hood.
o. The site for the proposed use relates to streets
and highways properly designed and improved to
carry the type and quantity of traffic generated
or to be generated by the proposed use.
p. The conditions imposed are necessary to protect
the public health, convenience, safety and
welfare.
q. Based upon the substantial evidence and conclu-
sions set forth herein above, and conditions set
forth below in this Resolution, presented to the
Commission, public hearing as set forth above,
this Commission, in conformance with the terms and
provisions of California Government Code Section
65360, hereby finds the following conditions as
deemed necessary to protect the public health,
safety, and general welfare and are reasonable and
proper.
1. The development shall conform to all plans as
submitted to and approved by the Planning
Commission labeled as Exhibits A -I.
2. The development shall incorporate all mitiga-
tion measures and conditions as described
within EIR 91-1.
3. A mitigation monitoring plan shall be devel-
oped by the applicant for review by the City
prior to issuance of any grading permit.
4. A final and detailed landscape and full -cov-
erage automatic irrigation system shall be
provided prior to the issuance of building
permits and subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning. Fence details, tree
staking, soil preparation and planting detail
shall be shown on final landscape plans.
Water conservation design and maintenance and
drought tolerant landscape planting shall be
incorporated whenever feasible into the final
design of the landscape and irrigation plans
for the site.
5. Textured concrete paving shall be provided at
the project entry, subject to the approval of
the City, to break up large masses of as-
phalt/concrete areas.
6. The lighting fixtures adjacent to interior
property lines shall be approved by the Di-
rector of Planning as to type, orientation
and height.
7. All slope planting and irrigation shall be
continuously maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition by the developer until
each individual unit is sold and occupied by
the buyer. Prior to releasing occupance for
those units, and inspection shall be conduct-
ed by the Planning Department to determine
that the planting is in satisfactory condi-
tion.
8. All off-site, landscaping, grading, and other
improvements shall be completed prior to the
occupancy of any unit.
9. Erosion control plans for all slopes adjacent
to major arterial and collector roadways
shall be submitted at the time of Grading
Plan Review and be approved by the City Engi-
neer.
10. Grading shall be in significant conformance
to the Tentative Tract Map and the proposed
grading that is approved by the Planning Com-
mission. Surety shall be posted to the sat-
isfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney to guarantee completion of the grad-
ing within the project.
11. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a
complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall
be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
12. Emergency secondary access shall be provide
adjacent to Lot 8 in accordance with the Los
Angeles County Fire Department standards and
the City.
13. Exterior construction activities (grading,
framing, etc.) shall be restricted to 7:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday,
except that interior construction activities
shall not be limited. All construction equip-
ment shall be properly muffled to reduce
noise levels. Transportation of equipment
and materials and operation of heavy grading
equipment shall also be limited to the hours
of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 P.M. All equipment stag-
ing areas shall be sited on the subject prop-
erty. Dust generated by construction activi-
ties shall be reduced by watering the soil
prior to and during grading activities.
t
14. A variety of materials and colors shall be
used on the proposed houses to the satisfac-
tion of the Planning Director.
15. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Re-
strictions (CC&R's and Articles of Incorpora-
tion of the Homeowners; Association, subject
to the approval of the City Attorney, shall
be recorded with this map and placed on file
With the Planning Department.
16. The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Na-
tional Electric Code, and all other applica-
ble codes, ordinances and regulations in ef-
fect at the time of issuance of relative per-
mits.
17. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted,
these conditions and all improvements shall
be completed to the satisfaction of the City.
18. The use authorized by this approval shall be
commenced or construction necessary and inci-
dental thereto shall be started on or before
the time limit specified herein and thereaf-
ter diligently advanced on or before one (1)
year after the expiration of the appeal peri-
od.
19. The applicant shall pay all environmental
review and processing fees prior to recorda-
tion of the tract map as required by the Di-
rector of Planning.
20. The applicant shall pay development fees (in-
cluding, but not limited to, Planning, Build-
ing, Park, and school fees) at the estab-
lished rates prior to issuance of Building
Permits, as required by the Director of Plan-
ning.
21. The applicant shall pay all engineering fees
at the established rates as required by the
City Engineer.
22. The applicant shall comply with all condi-
tions as listed within Exhibit "A" which is
comprised of a four page interoffice memoran-
dum from the City Engineer to the Director of
Planning, dated January 23, 1991, and at-
tached hereto.
23. Tennis courts may be allowed, with a maximum
six (6) foot wall, and no lighting. If the
lot is by itself without a house structure,
the waill of the tennis court could go to
eight (8) feet high.
24. Dwelling units in excess of 5,000 square feet
of gross floor area shall have minimum side
yard setbacks of ten (10) feet and fifteen
(15) feet from the edge of the property line.
25. Crib walls may be allowed if all reasonable
efforts have been made to implement the pre-
ferred option (either filling the hole in the
catch basin or leaving it alone) to the sat-
isfaction of the City Engineer and the Direc-
tor of Planning.
Based upon the substantial evidence, conclusions and conditions
set forth herein above, this Commission, in conformance with the
terms and provisions of California Government Code Section 65360,
hereby approves the applications referenced herein.
The Planning Commission Secretary is hereby directed (a) to certi-
fy to the adoption of this Resolution and, (b) forthwith transmit
a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return
receipt requested, to Piermarini Enterprises, Inc., 2100 South
Reservoir, Pomona, Ca 91766.
I, James DeStefano, Secretary to the City of Diamond Bar Planning
Commission do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was
passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 28th day of Jan-
uary, 1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Grothe, Lin, MacBride, VC
Harmony, Chairman Schey
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Addendum Materials for Revised EIR
Tentative Tract No. 47722
13 Lots - 19.08 Acres
13 a
associates * planners
City of Diamond Bar
Mr. Jim DeStefano, Director of Planning
21660 E. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
January 23, 1991
re: Additional Information requested and minor corrections to Revised Draft EIR prepared
for Tentative Tract No. 47722 (13 -Lot Alternative Design)
Dear Mr. DeStefano:
Attached for your review and use is the Project Engineer's computerized cut and fill analysis
prepared for the 13 -lot alternative design for Tentative Tract 47722. Also attached are ten
copies of three replacement pages to be inserted in the Revised EIR. They reflect the following
corrections which were discovered on a page by page reading of the final printed report:
1. Page (i) - Preface:
Correction of wording on items no. 2 and no. 4.
2. Page 5-5 - Alternative Design Project Description:
Same correction as above
3. Page 1-6 - Zoning and Land Use:
Chart has been corrected to reflect current zoning of property (R-1-10,000). The correct
zoning is found throughout the balance of the report.
To facilitate your use of the proposed mitigation measures as possible Conditions of Approval
for the 13 -Lot Alternative Design for Tentative Tract 47722, we have taken the various measures
(asoriginally proposed) and made the necessary adjustments in wording so that they are
applicable to the new alternative. Ten copies are attached.
These mitigation measures can be included among the formal Conditions of Approval attached
to the 13 -Lot Design Alternative for Tentative Tract 47722 and the accompanying Conditional
Use Permit (C.U.P. No. 89338) issued by the City of Diamond Bar. Used in conjunction with all
standard Conditions of Approval comrponly attached to a tentative residential map, these
measures will be fully adequate to mitigate to an acceptable level any foreseeable impact
determined to be potentially significant. In this way, the City of Diamond Bar will comply fully
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Beyond the
requirements of CEQA, certain impacts which have been determined not to be initially significant
have been reduced even further where possible through a number of the mitigation measures
proposed.
If you have any questions or need additional information prior to the scheduled Public Hearing
on this project, please call.
slacerely,
Dona AsM. West
Sen%r sociate
DMWlwrw
ACalifornia Corporation ❑ Land Planning and Design ❑ Environmental A
10722 Arrow Route, Suite 616, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 9807-1
Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report
Tentative Tract No. 47722 - City of Diamond Bar
IPreface
The project of focus, Tentative Tract No. 47722, is not a new project. It is a project
previously submitted to the City of Diamond Bar, which has been revised to mitigate the
environmental concerns noted in the original review. In addition, while the original project
was under review, the grading standards within the Zoning Ordinance were altered by the
City. The original design submitted could not meet these standards with the design
submitted nor was any design alternative which could meet these standards included in the
original EIR.
Subsequent to the action of the Planning Commission denying the original design, the
Applicant, with the assistance and guidance of the City did develop an alternative design to
the original configuration of Tentative Tract No. 47722 which does meet the new grading
standards. This alternative design was also adjusted to meet the environmental concerns of
the Planning Commission as follows:
1. The overall density of the project has been significantly reduced (16%)
2. The overall visual impact resulting from grading of the project has been significantly
reduced.
3. The grading now conforms to 'landform grading" concepts.
4. The required number of "crib walls" has been significantly reduced.
5. The revised EIR now includes both a 2 unit and 13 unit design which have now been
included among the alternatives.
I
This report is a revision and expansion of an original environmental impact report prepared
and previously reviewed by the City of Diamond Bar. The concerns in the original review
have caused revision of the original project design, expansion of this report and the
additional of two alternatives to the original project.
During review and analysis of the original project it was determined that one of the
alternatives discussed verbally was actually preferred by both the City and the Applicant.
This alternative is therefore afforded a much more detailed analysis than would have
otherwise been the case. From the viewpoint of community design, community standards
and environmental quality, the expanded alternative has now become the "preferred"
alternative.
Page - i
Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report
Tentative Tract No. 47722 - City of Diamond Bar
Zoning and Land Use
The project conforms to the density and land use specified in the existing zoning, General Plan and
Community Plan designations for the City of Diamond Bar. No amendment in zoning, land use
designation or any other variance is required. Although none of the lots are proposed as "flag" lots or
contain other significant dimensional irregularities, several of the lots do function as flag lots even
though they provide legal frontage along private access roads. Specifically, the Zoning and Land Use
designations currently in effect are met as follows:
Adopted General Plan: Non -Urban Uses -1.0 D.U./Acre or less
:a}saY. }ay .:�. { � `::,#�`��•*';:}, .`S:.y�. .. �F��7.:('�� :. �-::.�1!R.}:cy:� fi!!,.. ,:�� ..11�. .
'::r.�.:.:•.:•:::: L'i" •'{` ..�:'�•:, r �{ •�?::.:}y.f:var�.'•t't' :r•:-!f.+•,t: •�R..:>; .->.:.':o.a:.rr:rar••rr:::rrr:•rrrarrrrrrrri::':Frrr:
-.,:;:X.,#',:.�t;.:..'t`.r.':SMc:- ..S:a.,.::w ::ic;',i.:::.E:.Yrf. �.H �':? �l :.:5 `-'k• :::d:'•-
n:..
fir:..,.::::.::...,:.:..,'• .. .:: :t,. � y� ...
.... .. ..:..n..:.....::.:::..:....................?a.#.:..: .. .f. 'i,? -:N.:... .:.:: i:`-'�•:: �F-"1i bt�{y.�a''�'''}','1-,•''.••.•��.riii:i::-.:': n -r'- n�:isi2:a:::-:JiivnriiM1i::::::j:�'•.::,ti4:::::t:::,:'::::.:}:::i Vii:;
Adopted Zoning: R-1-10,000
N.:
•:s t:• . tt
3a.... R ' { :..:.t,.y :. :: r:: k.:.: _:: ,••. Fi;:r;:r;:rirr: y::'
:;K:,�t.. ty,�.,. .:x}`vt•. �+::5::} ^.w..: . sfi`.:<•kt ;<t: �•y,:: :•:a.:
:. --.�CPF.T-.am ......:........... t:::::a: ,. r.:-.::S:vi�:::a:....: t..vhvx;. vrF•-}}�'�' Sr. �ii'::{$JR:S'4:::N: t'}':�FF:%�'C'i}::?F:S.:i:T:
Community Plan: R-1-10,000
Non -Urban Uses -1.0 D.U./Acre or less
:rk•:,•rr:•r:•r••::•x-:: }r:•rtt•:::: :.:.
I
Related Permits
Because the project area contains slopes of 25% or greater, a Conditional Use Permit for
the local equivalent of the Los Angeles County's Hillside Management requirement is
requested concurrently with Tentative Tract approval. Conditions for development in
accordance with County Hillside Standards has been meet by Tentative Tract No. 47722.
Page 1- 6 1.0 Executive Summary
Revised Daft Environmental Impact Report
Tentative Tract No. 47722 - City of Diamond Bar
Alternative Design Project Description
This design alternative for Tentative Tract 47722 consists of a 13 -lot residential subdivison
which was prepared in response to environmental and other concerns raised by the City
Staff and Planning Commission upon receipt and consideration of the original 16 -lot
proposal. White the density is, by total percentage, significantly (16%) less than the original
tract, the primary goal was to develop a design alternative which was realistic as a project
alternative that met the Cities newly developed grading and hillside project standards. The
resulting decrease in density was largely a function of meeting the new local development
criteria.
This alternative design was developed concerns and objectives of the Planning Commission
as follows:
1. The overall density of this alternative project has been significantly reduced (this
design alternative proposes 84% the density of the original tract).
2. The overall visual impact resulting from grading of the project has been significantly
reduced.
3. The grading now conforms to "landform grading" concepts.
4. The required number of "crib walls" has been significantly reduced.
Page 5 - 5 5.0 Project Alternatives
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Tentative Tract No. 47722
13 Lots - 19.08 Acres
1-A. Existing soil instabilities shall be corrected by remedial grading in conformance
with the approved Final Design and approved Grading Plan for Tentative Tract
47722.
1-B. It is proposed that unstable material in these areas will be removed, replaced and
compacted to the ultimate grade shown on the Final Approved Design of
Tentative Map. Deposits of alluvium and colluvium will be removed and
compacted as directed by the soils engineer.
1-C. Major fill slopes around the periphery of the site are to be installed at slope ratios
of 2 to 1 and some interior fill slopes will be at 1-112 to i slope.
1-D. All slopes are to be constructed in accordance with adequate stability
requirements of both the soils consultant and the City Engineering Department.
1-E. Total grading on site is to be balanced on site in a stable cut and fill arrangement,
according to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 47722 and the
accompanying Grading Plan, subject to the approval of the Engineering
Department of the City of Diamond Bar.
1-F. All grading operations shall conform to the requirement of the City of Diamond
Bar and the standards grading specifications and recommendations presented in
the Preliminary Soils and Geologic Report, pages 5 - 13.
1-G. During grading operations, special consideration will be given to areas near and
around the 30 -inch high pressure gas line in accordance with the
recommendations of the soils engineer for this project, any additional
requirements of the City of Diamond Bar and the standards of the Southern
California Gas Company and related regulatory agencies.
Page 1
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Tentative Tract No. 47722
13 Lots - 19.08 Acres
2-A. The City of Diamond Bar utilizes the Uniform Building Code. This set of building
regulations contains design and construction standards adequate to mitigate any
potential seismic impacts to a level not considered to be significant.
2-B. In accordance with the proposed design of Tentative Tract No. 47722, no portion
of the existing or replacement line will underlie any primary or secondary
structures.
3-A. Gunite swales will control on site drainage and deliver run-off to existing drainage
systems already constructed in the residential areas abutting the site.
3-B. During grading and construction activities, revegetation of disturbed or newly
constructed slopes should be done as quickly as is feasible to prevent undue
erosion and lessen any non point pollution impacts to surface run-off.
3-C. Landscaping and necessary irrigation facilities will be installed as early as is
feasible to stabilize top soil and prevent excessive surface water erosion of newly
placed soil.
3-D. Adequate storm drain facilities will be provided to accommodate increased run-off
and further minimize soil erosion.
I
3-E. Landscaping will be with water -efficient plants, in accordance with the
accompanying landscape plan, subject to approval by the City of Diamond Bar,
3-F. To aid in water recharge, natural drainage areas will be preserved in open space
areas and natural drainage systems will be incorporated, wherever feasible.
Page 2
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Tentative Tract No. 47722
13 Lots - 19.08 Acres
(Limited to short-term noise impacts)
4-A. The operation of heavy grading equipment will be limit to specified hours of
operation an site access in accordance with the adopted Standards of the City of
Dlamond Bar. No activity will occur prior to 6:00 a.m. or after 7:00 p.m.
6-A. An Oak Tree Survey has been conducted in compliance with the requirements of
the County Department of Regional Planning. Copies of the survey report have
been submitted to the City of Diamond Bar as part of the technical material on file
for this application.
6-B. Replacement of all Oak Trees removed will be made at a ratio suitable to the City
of Diamond Bar with healthy and otherwise suitable specimens of a size and
quantity as required by the City of Diamond Bar.
6-C. Irrigation for the replacement trees will be provided for a period of three years
which they become established in place and develop the necessary feeder root
system ensuring self-sustainance. Irrigations facilities will be installed as
appropriate on slope areas and maintained by an association of project
homeowners.
6-D. Landscaping for individual hgmes, view screening for the purpose of affording
privacy to adjacent residences and planting of all common space areas (covered
in the grading process) will be done by the developer from the proposed pallet of
water efficient, biologically adapted and regionally hardy plants materials subject
to approval by the City of Diamond Bar.
Page 3
A.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IM-
PACT REPORT 91-1 AND APPROVING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 47722 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF
A THIRTEEN LOT SINGLE FAMILY UNIT RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT ON A NINETEEN ACRE SITE, SOKED BOTH
R-1-10,000 AND R-1-40,0000 AND LOCATED WEST
OF DERRINGER LANE, NORTH OF RIDGELIKE ROAD,
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
Recitals.
i. Piermarini Enterprises has filed an application request-
ing the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Ten-
tative Tract Map approval, and has submitted an Environ-
mental Impact Report, analyzing the above-mentioned de-
velopment project, as described in the title of this
resolution, (the project) hereinafter.
ii. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was estab-
lished as a duly organized municipal corporation of the
State of California. On said date, pursuant to the re-
quirements of the California Government Code Section
57476, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County
Code contains the Development Code of the County of Los
Angeles now currently applicable to development applica-
tions, including the subject Application, within the
City of Diamond Bar.
iii. Because of its recent incorporation, the City of Diamond
Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, ac-
tion was taken on the subject Application, as to consis-
tency to the General Plan, pursuant to the terms and
provisions of California Government Code Section 65360.
iv. A duly noticed public hearing on the above -referenced
application was conducted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Diamond Bar and concluded on January 28,
1991, prior to the adoption of this Resolution. The
Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the tentative tract map and certify the Environ-
mental Impact Report 91-1.
V. All legal prerequisites prior to this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
Now, therefore, it is found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution
are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Coun-
cil during the above -referenced public hearing, includ-
ing written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The proposed development involves a site which is
comprised of approximately nineteen acres of va-
cant hillside land within the R-1-10,000 and 8-1-
40,000 zoning district and is designated by the
Community Plan for non -urban residential develop-
ment, in one unit or less per acre. The site is
generally located west of Derringer Lane, north of
Ridgeline Road, and both east and south of The
County (development). The site consists of hilly
terrain. A slope analysis indicates that the
acreage contains slopes which range from zero to
over thirty-five percent. A thirty inch diameter
Southern California Gas Company high pressure gas
line traverses the southerly portion of the site.
The applicant's proposal is for a subdivision of
thirteen lots, which will range in size from .5
gross acres to 3.4 gross acres. Building pads
range in size from .28 acres to .48 acres. The
building units planned for the pads range in size
from five to ten thousand square feet.
b. The property to the north and west of the project
site is zoned R-1-8,000 and presently is developed
with detached single family residential dwelling
units. The property to the east and south of the
project site is zoned R-1-40,000 and presently is
vacant and undeveloped.
C. The City Council hereby certifies that Environmen-
tal Impact Report (EIR 91-1) has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Qual-
ity Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and, further, that the
City Council has reviewed and considered the in-
formation contained in said Environmental Impact
Report (EIR 91-1).
d. The City Council hereby finds that changes or al-
terations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which mitigate or avoid the sig-
nificant environmental impact thereof as identi-
fied in said Environmental Impact Report, Number,
EIR 91-1.
e. The Community Plan, identifies the project site as
non -urban residential. There is a reasonable prob-
ability that the project, as proposed, will be
consistent with the proposed General Plan.
f. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development being proposed as depicted within the
Exhibits and as conditioned herein.
g. The design of the subdivision and the proposed
improvements will not cause substantial environ-
mental damage or substantial avoidable injury to
wildlife or their habitat. Project impacts have
been identified within the Environmental Impact
Report and mitigation measures have been proposed
and are referenced herein.
h. The design of the subdivision and the type of im-
provements will not cause serious public health
problems.
i. The site is physically suitable for the proposed
type of density and development.
j. The design and improvements of the proposed sub-
division will not conflict with public easements
for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
k. The use applied for at the location set forth in
the application is property one for which a condi-
tional use permit is authorized by the Los Angeles
County Code.
1. The use is not detrimental to the existing uses or
to uses specifically permitted within the zone in
which the proposed use is to be located.
M. The use will be compatible with other uses in the
general area in which the use is proposed to be
located.
n. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the uses in all of the
yards, set -backs, walls, fences, landscaping and
other features required to adjust the use to the
existing or future uses permitted in the neighbor-
hood.
o. The site for the proposed use relates to streets
and highways properly designed and improved to
carry the type and quantity of traffic generated
or to be generated by the proposed use.
P. The conditions imposed are necessary to protect
the public health, convenience, safety and
welfare.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence and findings set
forth herein above, and conditions set forth below in
this Resolution, presented to the City Council, public
hearing as set forth above, this Council, in conformance
with the terms and provisions of California Government
Code Section 65360, hereby finds the following condi-
tions necessary to protect the public health, safety,
and general welfare and are reasonable and proper.
1. The development shall conform to all plans as
submitted to and approved by the Planning
Commission labeled as Exhibits A -I.
2. The development shall incorporate all mitiga-
tion measures and conditions as described
within EIR 91-1.
3. The applicant shall develop a program which
implements the mitigation monitoring plan/
mitigation measures identified in EIR 91-1.
Such program shall include provision of all
funds necessary to implement the program.
The program shall not be deemed accepted un-
til reviewed and approved by the City Plan-
ner. No grading permits shall be issued un-
less and until the mitigation monitoring pro-
gram is approved.
4. A final and detailed landscape and full -cov-
erage automatic irrigation system shall be
provided prior to the issuance of building
permits and subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning. Fence details, tree
staking, soil preparation and planting detail
shall be shown on final landscape plans.
Water conservation design and maintenance and
drought tolerant landscape planting shall be
incorporated whenever feasible into the final
design of the landscape and irrigation plans
for the site.
5. Textured concrete paving shall be provided at
the project entry, subject to the approval of
the City Planner for the purpose of breaking
up large masses of asphalt/concrete areas.
6. The lighting fixtures adjacent to interior
property lines shall be approved by the Di-
rector of Planning as to type, orientation
and height.
7. All slope planting and irrigation shall be
continuously maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition by the developer until
each individual unit is sold and occupied by
the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for
those units, an inspection shall be conducted
by the Planning Department to determine that
the planting is in satisfactory condition.
8. All off-site, landscaping, grading, and other
improvements shall be completed prior to the
occupancy of any unit.
9. Erosion control plans for all slopes adjacent
to major arterial and collector roadways
shall be submitted at the time of Grading
Plan Review and be approved by the City Engi-
neer.
10. Grading shall be in substantial conformance
to the Tentative Tract Map and the proposed
grading that is approved by the City Council.
Surety shall be posted to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer and the City Attorney to
guarantee completion of the grading within
the project.
11. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a
complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall
be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer,
submitted to and approved by the City Engi-
neer.
12. Emergency secondary access shall be provide
adjacent to Lot 8 in accordance with the Los
Angeles County Fire Department standards and
the City.
13. Exterior construction activities (grading,
framing, etc.) shall be restricted to 7:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday,
except that interior construction activities
shall not be limited. All construction equip-
ment shall be properly muffled to reduce
noise levels. Transportation of equipment
and materials and operation of heavy grading
equipment shall also be limited to the hours
of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. All equipment stag-
ing areas shall be sited on the subject prop-
erty. Dust generated by construction activi-
ties shall be reduced by watering the soil
prior to and during grading activities.
14. A materials and color pallet shall submitted
to and approved by the Planning Director pri-
or to issuance of building permits.
15. The applicant shall prepare and submit Cove-
nants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's
and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeown-
ers Association), for the approval of the
City Attorney, the same shall be recorded
with this map and placed on file with the
Planning Department.
16. The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Na-
tional Electric Code, and all other applica-
ble codes, ordinances and regulations in ef-
fect at the time of issuance of relative per-
mits.
17. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted,
all these conditions of approval shall be
completed to the satisfaction of the City.
18. The development authorized by this approval
shall be commenced or construction necessary
and incidental thereto shall be started on or
before the time limit specified herein and
thereafter diligently advanced on or before
one (1) year after the expiration of the ap-
peal period.
19. The applicant shall pay all environmental
review and processing fees prior to recorda-
tion of the tract map as required by the Di-
rector of Planning.
20. The applicant shall pay development fees (in-
cluding, but not limited to, Planning, Build-
ing, Park, and school fees) at the estab-
lished rates prior to issuance of Building
Permits.
21. The applicant shall pay all engineering fees
at the established rates as required by the
City Engineer.
22. The applicant shall comply with all condi-
tions as listed within Exhibit "A" which is
comprised of a four page interoffice memoran-
dum from the City Engineer to the Director of
Planning, dated January 23, 1991, and attach-
ed hereto.
23. Tennis courts shall be allowed only if devel-
oped with a maximum six (6) foot wall, and no
lighting. In the event the lot is improved
without a house structure, the wall of the
tennis court may be developed to eight (8)
feet in height above grade.
24. Dwelling units in excess of 5,000 square feet
of gross floor area shall have minimum side
yard setbacks of ten (10) feet and fifteen
(15) feet from the edge of the property line.
25. Crib walls may be allowed if all reasonable
efforts have been made to implement the pre-
ferred option (either filling the hole in the
catch basin or leaving it alone) to the sat-
isfaction of the City Engineer and the Direc-
tor of Planning.
Based upon the substantial evidence, conclusions and conditions
set forth herein above, this Council, in conformance with the
terms and provisions of California Government Code Section 65360,
hereby approves the applications referenced herein.
The City Clerk is hereby directed (a) to certify to the adoption
of this Resolution and, (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
Piermarini Enterprises, Inc., 2100 South Reservoir, Pomona, Ca
91766.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991.
MAYOR
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a reg-
ular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held
on the day of , 1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS -
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS -
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS -
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS -
ATTEST:
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
Secretary to the Planning Commission
AGENDA NO. QD
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR -----------N----------- --
AGENDA REPORT
----------------------------= __________�
DATE: March 14, 1991 MEETING DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
VIA: James DeStefano, Director of Plann
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to Interim Ordinanc No. 15-A (1990) Pertaining to
Quasi -Public Uses Within the C -M Zone
BACKGROUND:
In October of 1990 the City Council adopted an interim ordinance (Number 15-
1990) amending the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the
CM zone. The City Council adopted the interim ordinance in order to provide the
necessary study time to review the most advantageous and appropriate land uses
for the CM zone. The ordinance effectively removed all non -revenue producing
land uses (with the exception of accessory uses) from the CM zone as a mechanism
to grant additional land use controls in the period preceding the forthcoming
General Plan. The City Council met again on November 13, 1990 to extend the
ordinance to the 16th of October, 1991. The Council, as a result of public tes-
timony presented at the November 15, 1990 hearing, directed staff to provide the
Planning Commission the opportunity to investigate the appropriateness for rein-
troducing the Church use into the CM zone.
The City currently possesses five areas zoned C -M. This zone represents the
greatest potential for new commercial development throughout the City. Current-
ly, none of the churches within the City are developed in CM zones. Churches in
the City are developed on sites zoned for residential development and no church-
es are developed in commercially or industrially zoned areas although legally
permissible.
Narrative Continued on the Next Page.
r-1ibUP-JU IMMAC:T:
Amount Requested $ N/A
Budgeted Amount $ N/A
In Account Number
Deficit: $ N/A
Revenue Source:
nr+vlr,nrLu Ox;
xooert L. van Nort ItAndrew V. Arczynski
City Manager City Attorney
Terrence L. Belanger
Assistant City Manag
AGENDA ITEM
March 19, 1991
Page TWO
STAFF REPORT:
Attached is a memo relative to church and other institutional uses
in the Commercial Manufacturing (C -M) Zone, as well as a
recommendation for a Conditional Use Permit procedure to permit
such uses.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning Commission reviewed the request on January 28, 1991,
February 11, 1991 and concluded its deliberation on February 25,
1991 by adopting Resolution 91-4 recommending that quasi -public
uses be permitted in the C -M zone subject to standards and
restrictions.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that if the concept in the attached memorandum is
acceptable that the Council direct staff to prepare an ordinance
for consideration.
JDS:pjs
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: James DeStefano, Director of Planning
FROM: r�/ Irwin M. Kaplan, City Planner
SUBJECT: Institutional Uses in the C -M Zone
DATE: March 15, 1991
OVERVIEW:
In general, institutional uses such as churches either are, or can
be designed to complement both commercial and residential uses,
but the decision as to how such uses should fit into the fabric of
the community depends upon the particular circumstances of the
community. This is but one of many questions the City must ask
itself as it makes choices for the future.
To place this issue in perspective, we need only look at the rea-
son the City of Diamond Bar is rewriting the Development Code in
its entirety. While the County's Codes were undoubtedly well
suited to the County as a whole, their underlying development phi-
losophy was unsuitable to Diamond Bar. Unfortunately, this is not
always evident until the City is confronted with a specific in-
stance which challenges its beliefs.
The problem is exacerbated by the fact that upon incorporation,
the City adopted the very Codes which led to the City's decision
to break away from County rule. This simply means that the
trends, the momentum and the pressure to approve projects continue
at the same time that the City is trying to figure out how devel-
opment patterns should change.
Under similar circumstances, some Cities have opted for a develop-
ment moratorium or stringent interim regulations to limit develop-
ment so as to keep their options open until they conclude the ini-
tial planning process. In an effort to show support for continued
development during the planning process, however, Diamond Bar made
a conscious decision to allow development to continue while the
planning process was underway.
This decision sets a difficult and demanding course for the City
and increases the risk of allowing development which might be in-
consistent with the direction the City may ultimately pursue. It
also virtually guarantees confrontation when the City is faced
with a development request which may conflict with the City's
broad development objectives, but which meets all the City's
requirements.
Memorandum to James DeStefano
March 15, 1991
Page Two
The request to permit institutional uses in a commercial zone is
not the first example of this problem. In its relatively short
history, the City has responded to similar problems by implement-
ing a development review process, a sign moratorium and an Interim
Hillside Control Ordinance.
Nor should this request be viewed as the last challenge to the
City's emerging development philosophy. Such challenges will con-
tinue to occur throughout the planning process and beyond, until
the City has years of experience which cover the full range of
development issues.
THE ISSUE:
The question, therefore, is twofold.
1. How should the City respond when confronted with similar cir-
cumstances in the future, and
2. How might the City apply this approach to the specific ques-
tion of church/institutional uses in commercial zones.
1. Aside from the obvious solution to either permit
or prohibit development, there is a range of op-
portunities in between which may be more suitable.
In broad terms, the City may choose to:
a. Permit limited or restricted development to
occur under regulations which are carefully
designed to preserve the City's opportunity
to achieve its long term objectives.
b. Require such development to provide compen-
sating benefits (such as community amenities,
services or other physical improvements) as
additional impact mitigation measures, to
help offset the lost potential of the City's
ability to provide such benefits if and when
the property were developed for commercial
purposes.
Depending upon the circumstances, the City may use a combination
of these techniques. In any case, the City needs the time, par-
ticularly in its formative years, for thoughtful deliberation and
should not allow itself to be stampeded into making premature de-
cisions which could have a significant impact upon its future.
Memorandum to James DeStefano
March 15, 1991
Page Three
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Churches as a permitted use in commercial zones is a carry-
over from the County Code.
2. In Diamond Bar, however, virtually all (if not all) churches
are located in residential zones.
3. Churches in commercial zones would be a departure from the
existing development pattern and, as such, poses a legitimate
policy question.
4. The primary purpose of commercial zoning is to stimulate com-
mercial development. Generally, such locations are selected
because of their strategic location which provides relatively
easy access and allows them to compete effectively with com-
mercial areas elsewhere and to serve an existing or potential
need. Such sites are difficult to come by, particularly in a
community such as Diamond Bar, whose development patterns are
well established.
While commercial zoning is not usually restricted only to
commercial uses, in a planned environment, other types of
development would generally be permitted to the extent that
they complement, or at least do not jeopardize, the basic
purpose of the commercial zone.
5. If there is any doubt as to whether or not it is in the
City's long term best interest to permit church related uses
which might preempt a significant portion of the City's
undeveloped commercial potential at a key freeway interchange
location, the City should not foreclose its options prior to
completion of the General Plan.
6. The City's vision for the future should not be restricted by
current market opportunities, particularly for major land use
decisions such as this. As difficult as it might be to re-
sist the pressures and opportunities of the moment, the City
should view this issue in terms of the larger picture, which
include:
a. potential sources of revenue and the availability of
amenities to sustain the quality of life that is so im-
portant to Diamond Bar residents, and
b. the impact of removing a large tract of strategically
located, commercially zoned land from the City's commer-
cial inventory.
Memorandum to James DeStefano
March 15, 1991
Page Four
7. Diamond Bar has in the past, and continues to be, responsive
to the needs of churches wishing to locate or expand in the
community. Due to the importance of the decision as to how
to use commercially zoned property, the City should define
its objectives carefully, as churches in commercial zones
present a markedly different set of circumstances than
churches in residential zones. While the City has the autho-
rity to prohibit churches in C -M zones (and in fact had done
so under the Interim Ordinance), it has indicated an interest
in making provision for such uses under certain conditions as
an additional option.
8. With the exception of the property at the southwest corner of
Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive, large, centrally lo-
cated, freeway accessible, developable, commercially zoned
properties, are virtually non-existent in Diamond Bar.
9. A decision to allow significant non-commercial development in
commercial zones which may diminish the City's ability to
sustain the community's quality of life at some time in the
future, should also consider alternative measures to restore
the City's ability to provide needed services and amenities.
RECOMMENDATION:
At its meeting of February 11, 1991, the Planning Commission rec-
ommended Council approval of the following amendment to the Inter-
im Ordinance for C -M zones.
1. Institutional uses in C -M zones should be permitted by CUP,
secured by a development agreement, which define the specific
conditions of development (e.g. location of the institutional
use on the parcel, types and intensity of use, etc.) and an
appropriate level of fees and/or charges to offset, or to
compensate the City for revenue opportunities foreclosed as a
result of the development of commercial property for institu-
tional use. In determining such fees or charges the City
would take into account any amenities services or improve-
ments provided by the institutional use which would be of
benefit to the community.
To accomplish this, it is suggested that a fiscal impact analysis
be conducted under the auspices of the City at the same time as
the environmental review. The fiscal impact analysis would be
underwritten by the applicant, as is the Environmental Impact Re-
port (EIR).
Memorandum to James DeStefano
March 15, 1991
Page Five
2. "Institutional" uses should be broadly defined, so as to
avoid similar problems in the future. (It may be appropriate
to eventually consider expanding the CUP requirement for in-
stitutional uses to all commercial zones).
PROPOSAL:
A request for Conditional Use Permit would be in accordance with
Chapter 22.56 of the Municipal Code, which establishes the re-
quirements and procedures for such uses.
It should be noted that under this section of the Code, a request
for a conditional use may be approved with or without conditions,
or may be denied. Unless the Commission is satisfied that the
conditions it establishes will be complied with, it is not incum-
bent upon the Commission to approve the project, as conditional
uses are not considered "By Right" uses.
It is recommended that a new definition for quasi -public uses be
added, which would encompass a variety of institutional uses (in-
cluding churches) which would be subject to the CUP requirements.
A new section would be added specifically for quasi -public uses,
which would contain additional regulations to guide Commission
deliberations.
A. The following definition is suggested:
Quasi -Public Use
A use operated by a private non-profit educational, re-
ligious, recreational, charitable or medical institu-
tion, such use having the purpose primarily of serving
the general public, and including uses such as churches,
private schools, and universities, community, youth and
senior citizen recreational facilities, private hospi-
tals, and the like.
B. The following additional regulations are suggested:
1. Quasi -public uses in C -M zones shall be complemen-
tary with and subordinate in size, scale and in-
tensity to, adjacent existing and potential com-
mercial development.
Memorandum to James DeStefano
March 15, 1991
Page Six
2. Quasi -public uses in C -M zones shall be sited in a
manner which is ancillary to existing and poten-
tial commercial development, so as to permit maxi-
mum exposure and ease of access for adjacent com-
mercial uses.
3. In approving a conditional use for a quasi -public
use in a C -M zone, the Planning Commission shall
consider the direct benefit of the use to the com-
munity, as well as the cost of any mitigation mea-
sures needed to reduce potential environmental
impacts to insignificant levels, as well as the
opportunity cost of developing such quasi -public
use in a commercial zone.
The Commission shall recommend a program for the
provision of amenities, services and improvements,
and/ or a fee structure which establishes the val-
ue of both capital improvements and/or annual
charges, as may be deemed reasonable and appropri-
ate.
4. Final action on the Commission's recommendation
shall be incorporated into a development agree-
ment, if appropriate, adopted in accordance with
Chapter 22.16 of the Municipal Code.
IMK:pjs
RESOLUTION NO. 91-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECOMMENDING THAT
QUASI -PUBLIC USES BE PERMITTED IN THE CM
ZONING DISTRICT SUBJECT TO CERTAIN SPECIFIC
STANDARDS AND REQUESTING CITY COUNCIL
DIRECTION THEREUPON.
A. Recitals.
(i) The City Council has adopted an interim Zoning
Ordinance which prohibits non-commercial uses, including
churches, from being instituted as a land use within the CM
Zoning District.
(ii) The City Council has directed the Planning
Commission to review and recommend procedures whereby churches
will be permitted, subject to conditions, in the CM Zoning
District.
(iii) The Planning Commission has studied the issue
and has reviewed a proposal which expands the scope of permitted
uses beyond church uses. Such expansion of permitted uses is
premised on a new definition encompassing a range of
quasi-public/institutional uses.
(iv) The Planning Commission acknowledges that the
submitted proposal is subject to modifications to alleviate
potential legal challenge prior to its finalization.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
1
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in Recitals, Part A,
hereinabove.
2. The Planning Commission, in response to City
Council direction, has reviewed a process by which churches, as
well as other similar uses, would be permitted within the CM
Zoning District. The Planning Commission hereby submits a
proposal for the inclusion of quasi -public uses within the CM
Zone. The Planning Commission believes their recommendations
provide an appropriate basis by which the interim Zoning
Ordinance could be modified. Such proposal is attached as Exhibit
IRA".
3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission is
directed to attest to this Resolution.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 25 day of February 1991.
Chairman
I, JAMES DESTEFANO, Secretary to the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 25
day of February , 1991, and was finally passed at a regular
2
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
held on the 25 day of February
1991, by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Schey, C/Grothe, C/Lin
NOES :C/MacBride
COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
VC/Harmony
ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS
None
ATTEST:
N\1011 MESPUBLC�DB 3
Secretary of the Planning
Commission
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
(As of April 1, 1991)
COMMITTEE
California Contract Cities Association
10810 Paramount, Suite 202
Downey 90241
213-861-3908
Contact: Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir.
Meets 3rd Wednesday of each month
at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30
p.m. dinner at various restaurant
locations of host City. Reservations
required.
D.B. Chamber of Commerce
1081 S. Grand Ave., 91765
714-861-2121
Contact: Lois Vihlen, Chamber Manager
Board of Directors: Meets 1st Monday
at 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar Country Club
Executive Committee: Meets 2 weeks
prior to monthly Board Meeting, if
needed
East San Gabriel Valley
Planning Committee
Contact: George Shindo
818-332-7181
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at
6:30 p.m., at various restaurant
locations of host city.
Planning Directors Sub -Committee:
Meets 4th Monday of each month at
12:00 noon at Cal Poly.
Foothill Transit Zone
100 N. Barranca #980, W. Covina
Contact: Bill Forsythe
818-967-3147
Meets 2nd Wednesday of each month at
7:30 a.m. at above address.
DELEGATE
Forbing
Nardella
DeStefano
Papen
ALTERNATE
Kim
Kim
L.A. County City Selection Committee
Forbing
383 Hall of Administration
500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles 90012
213-974-1431
Contact: Larry J. Monteilh, Secretary
Meets 1st Thursday of each month
(same evening and location as League
of California Cities, L.A. Division)
L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21
Forbing
1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier 90601-4998
Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier 90601-4998
213-699-7411
Contact: Charles Carry, Chief
Engineer & Gen. Mgr.
Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at
2:00 p.m. at District Office
League of Calif. Cities
Forbing
L.A. County Division
900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 404
Los Angeles 90017
213-629-1422
Contact: Jack O'Neil, Exec. Dir.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month at
6:30 p.m. at Luminarias Restaurant,
3500 Ramona Blvd., Monterey Park
San Gabriel valley Assn. of Cities
Werner
P.O. Box 322, South Pasadena 91030
818-441-4022
Contact: Fletcher H. Swan, Secretary
Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at
9:30 a.m. at various restaurant
locations
San Gabriel Valley Mosquito Abatement
Papen
2618 Grand Ave., Rm. 480
Los Angeles 90007
213-881-4005
Contact: Barbara Gondo
Meets "as -needed"
Kim
Kim
Kim
Nardella
S.A.N.E. Program/Council Liaison
Blanche Wilson, Starr Center
Colima & Telegraph, Whittier
Contact: Audrey Warner, W.V.U.S.D.
595-1261
Meets "as needed"
sister Cities International
120 S. Payne Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Office: 703-836-3535
FAX: 703-836-4815
Southern California Assn.
of Governments (SCAG)(7/1/90)
818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor
Los Angeles 90017
213-236-1800
Contact: Oscar Abarca
Transportation/Communication
Committee: Meets 3rd Thursday of
each month at 9:30 a.m. - SCAG Facility
Papen
Nardella
Kim
Kim
Papen
Community, Economic and Human Development Committee: Meets 3rd Thursday
of each month at 6:00 p.m. - SCAG Facility
Three County Papen
Advisory Committee (Soquel Canyon) Kim P
Contact: James Douglas, Project Manager
Parsons, Brinkerhoff
Orange Commerce Center
505 S. Main St. #900
Orange, 92608
714-973-4880
Technical Advisory Committee meets at Brea Civic Center
STANDING COMMITTEES
Pomona Unified School District Papen Werner
800 S. Garey Ave., Pomona 91769-2900
Mailing: P.O. Box 2900, Pomona 91769-2900
714-622-0489
Contact: Brenda Engdahl, 714-622-0486
Meets: as necessary
Walnut Valley Unified School Dist.
Nardella Forbing
880 S. Lemon Ave., Walnut 91789
714-595-1261
Contact: Joann Hanson, Secretary
Meets 1st and 3rd Wednesdays. 7:00 p.m., W.v.U.S.D. Board Room
City of industry Liaison
Kim Nardella
Meets "as needed"
D.B. Historial Committee
Entry Sign Committee
Personnel
Finance
Computers
Ranch Festival
LB:000NCiL.COM/4-1-91
Forbing
Forbing/Kim
Werner/Nardella
Papen/Kim
Werner/Nardella
Forbing/Papen
COMMITTEE
Area "D" Civil Def
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
(As of 8, 1990)
/0-� (' l 9 q/
Contact: arles Majus
2904 Rio Lobo , D.B.
860-2885
,0o
Mee 4th Wednes of each mo at
7. 0 p.m., Wal t Sheriff St ion,
ssembly \Roo
California Contract Cities Association
10810 Paramount, Suite 202
Downey 90241
213-861-3908
Contact: Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir.
Meets 3rd Wednesday of each month
at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30
p.m. dinner at various restaurant
locations of host City. Reservations
required.
D.B. Chamber of Commerce
1081 S. Grand Ave., 91765
714-861-2121
Contact: Lois Vihlen, Chamber Manager
Board of Directors: Meets 1st Monday
at 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar Country Club
Executive Committee: Meets 2 weeks
prior to monthly Board Meeting, if
needed
East San Gabriel Valley
Planning Committee
Contact: George Shindo
818-332-7181
Meets 4th Thursday of each month at
,6:30 p.m., at various restaurant
locations of host city.
Planning Directors Sub -Committee:
Meets 4th Monday of each month at
12:00 noon at Cal Poly. \
Foothill Transit Zone J1
100 N. Barranca #980, Covina
Contact: Bill Forsythe
818-967-3147
Meets 2nd Wednesday of each month at
7:30 a.m. at above address.
DELEGATE ALTERNATE
Werner Forbing
Fr-,�Z/s
Papen Kim
L.A. County City Selection Committee
383 Hall of Administration
500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles 90012
213-974-1431
Contact: Larry J. Monteilh, Secretary
Meets 1st Thursdav of each month
(same evening and location as League
of California Cities, L.A. Division)
/� 7
ount Sanitation District No. 21 Werner(
L.A. C y
1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier 90601-4998
Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier 90601-4998
213-699-7411
Contact: Charles Carry, Chief
Engineer & Gen. Mgr.
Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at
2:00 p.m. at District Office
League of Calif. Cities
L.A. County Division
900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 404
Los Angeles 90017
213-629-1422
Contact: Jack O'Neil, Exec. Dir.
Meets 1st Thursday of each month at
6:30 p.m. at Luminarias Restaurant,
3500 Ramona Blvd., Monterey Park
San Gabriel Valley Assn. of Cities
P.O. Box 322, South Pasadena 91030
818-441-4022
Contact: Fletcher H. Swan, Secretary
Meets 3rd Thursdav of each month at
9:30 a.m. at various restaurant
locations
San Gabriel Valley Mosquito Abatement
2618 Grand Ave., Rm. 480
Los Angeles 90007
213-881-4005
Contact: Barbara Gondo
Meets "as -needed"
S.A.N.E. Program/Council Liaison
Blanche Wilson, Starr Center
Colima & Telegraph, Whittier
Contact: Audrey Warner, W.V.U.S.D.
595-1261
Meets "as needed" -2-
L'er7
t
13.± -
4 aa,
Papen
Papen
sister Cities International
120 S. Payne Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Office: 703-836-3535
FAX: 703-836-4815
Southern California Assn.
of Governments (SCAG)(7/1/90)
818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor
Los Angeles 90017
213-236-1800
Contact: Oscar Abarca
Transportation/Communication
Committee: Meets 3rd Thursday of
each month at 9:30 a.m. - SCAG Facility
Nardella
Kim
Kim
Papen
Community, Economic and Human Development Committee: Meets 3rd Thursday
of each month at 6:00 p.m. - SCAG Facility
Three County Kim
Advisory Committee (Soquel Canyon)
Contact: James Douglas, Project Manager
Parsons, Brinkerhoff
Orange Commerce Center
505 S. Main St. #900
Orange, 92608
714-973-4880
Technical Advisory Committee meets at Brea Civic Center
STANDING COMMITTEES
Pomona Unified School District
800 S. Garey Ave., Pomona 91769-2900
Mailing: P.O. Box 2900, Pomona 91769-2900
714-622-0489
I
Contact: Brenda Engdahl, 714-622-0486
Meets: as necessary
Walnut Valley unified School Dist.
880 S. Lemon Ave., Walnut 91789
714-595-1261
Contact: Joann Hanson, Secretary
Papen
Nardella
Papen
Werner
Forbing
Meets 1st and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m., W.V.U.S.D. Board Room
City of Industry Liaison
Meets "as needed".
-3-
Kim
Nardella
L itrrervice A enc�t YaAgency
providing professional and personalized housekeepers
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 COPLEY DR.
DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765
RE: CALVARY CHAPEL
DEAR CITY COUNCIL,
3-25-91
AT YOUR SERVICE AGENCY IS LOCATED A FEW BLOCKS FROM THE
PROPERTY PURCHASED BY CALVARY CHAPEL. CALVARY CHAPEL
WOULD BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR ON GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. TRAFFIC
IS HEAVY ON GOLDEN SPRINGS AND WILL INCREASE AS NEW
BUSINESSES OPEN IN THE GATEWAY CENTER. CALVARY CHAPEL'S
TRAFFICE FLAW WOULD BE IN THE EVENING AND ON WEEKENDS -
AT YOUR SERVICE WOULD NOT DIRECTLY BENEFIT FROM CALVARY
CHAPEL, BUT I CAN SEE HOTELS, RESTAURNi'S AND BANQUET
FACILITIES IN THE DIAMOND BAR AREA HAVING A INCREASED
CASH FLOW.
THANK YOU FOR READING MY LETTER AND CONSIDERING A POSITIVE
DECISION IN YOUR ZONING CHANGE TO ALLOW CALVARY CHAPEL TO
JOIN DIAMOND BAR.
SINCERELY,
AT YOUR SERVICE AGENCY
MEARLYN STEIN, OWNER
21450 Golden Springs Drive . Walnut, CA 91789 . (714) 594-1910
AGENDA ITEM NO. 22
NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE