HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/1990Incorporated April 18, 1989
City of Diamond Bar, California
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Mayor - Gary H. Werner
Mayor Pro Tem - John Forbing
Councilwoman - Phyllis Papen
Councilman - Jay Kim
Councilman - Donald C. Nardella
City Council Chambers
are located at:
Walnut Valley Unified School District Board Room
880 South Lemon Avenue
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers,
MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Andrew V. Arczynski
MEETING TIME: CLOSED SESSION: 5:15 p.m. City Attorney
REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 p.m.
Lynda Burgess
City Clerk
topes of staff reports or other.writtendocumentation relating to each item referred to on this agenda are on the
n the Officef the City Clerkiand are available for public inspection. ff you have questions regarding any agenda item,
:ontact the City Clerk at (714) 860-2489 during business hoU[S.
City of Diamond Bar uses RECYCLED
paper and encourages you to do the same.
THIS MEETING IS BEING TAPED BY JONES INTERCABLE FOR
AIRING ON CHANNEL 51, AND BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM,
YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TAPED. ALL COUNCIL
MEETING TAPES WILL BE BLACKED IMMEDIATELY AFTER AIRING
AND WILL BE UNAVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION.
CLOSED SESSION
5:15 p.m. Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9
Personnel - Government Code Section 54957.6
Next Resolution No. 97
Next Ordinance No. 17
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Werner
ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEN NARDELLA, PAPEN, KIM, MAYOR
PRO TEM FORBING, MAYOR WERNER
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are
for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or
the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting.
PUBLIC' COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each
regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the
public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or
matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled
for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a speaker's Card
and give it to the 2itV Clerk completion of this form is
voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when
addressing the City Council
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent
Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single
motion.
1. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS
A. City Offices closed - December 24 & 25, 1990 for
Christmas Holidays and January 1, 1991 - New Year's
Day.
B. No City Council Meeting - January 1, 1991.
C. Parks and Recreation Commission - January 10, 1991
- 6:30 p.m. - City Hall - 21660 E. Copley Dr.,
Suite 100.
D. Traffic and Transportation Commission - January 10,
1991 - 6:00 p.m. - Community Room, 1061 S. Grand
Ave.
E. Planning Commission - January 14, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
- W.V.U.S.D. Board Room - 880 S. Lemon Ave.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 2 DECEMBER 18, 1990
F. City Council Meeting - January 15, 1991 - 6:00 p.m.
- W.V.U.S.D. Board Room - 880 S. Lemon Ave.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Adjourned Regular Meeting of
November 29, 1990 and Regular Meeting of December 4,
1990.
3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated
December 18, 1990 in the amount of $341,114.48.
4. PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION - Receive and file Parks
and Recreation Commission Minutes of August 9, August 23,
and September 13, 1990.
5. PLANNING COMMISSION - Receive and file Planning
Commission Minutes of September 24 and October 8, 1990.
6. APPOINTMENT OF LAW FIRM - Approve appointment of the
Law Firm of Frelich, Stone, Leitner & Carlisle to
represent the City's interest in a lawsuit filed by
Potlatch Corporation and Simpson Paper.
• RESOLUTION NO. 90 - XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON
BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1697
IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR FOR FUTURE OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE THEREOF - Private Drain No. 1697
was constructed in 1988 as part of improvements in Tract
No. 38454. The drain has been inspected and approved by
L.A. County Department of Public Works based on upon
satisfactory completion of improvements per approved
plans. The City Engineer reviewed the improvements and
is in agreement.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90 - XX
requesting L.A. County Board of Supervisors to accept the
transfer and conveyance of Private Drain No. 1697.
8. BOND EXONERATION - L.A. County Department of Public Works
requested exoneration of a bond for Street Tree
Improvements, Tract No. 42577 vicinity of Longview Dr.
and Grand Ave. City Engineer has reviewed and approves.
Recommended Action: Approve work completed, exonerate
the Surety Bond and direct City Clerk to send Council
action to principals involved.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 3
DECEMBER 18, 1990
9. RESOLUTION NO. 90 - XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT
GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE AND SUNSET CROSSING ROAD IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE. BIDS - Pursuant to Council
direction, plans for the installation of a traffic signal
at the intersection of Golden Springs Dr. and Sunset
Crossing Rd. have been prepared for Council approval.
Recommended Action: Approve plans and authorize
advertising for bids with a bid opening date of January
23, 1991.
:LO. A) RESOLUTION NO. 90 - XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SUPPORTING THE
USE OF THE CITY'S NAME IN LIEU OF THE DELIVERY POST
OFFICE NAME FOR THOSE RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES
LOCATED IN THE 91789 ZIP CODE.
B) RESOLUTION NO. 90 - XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
PETITIONING THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO
ESTABLISH AN OFFICIAL POST OFFICE STATION TO SERVE
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Pursuant to Council
direction to help alleviate the problem confronted
by Area "A's" Zip Code of 91789, two resolutions
have been prepared.
Recommended Action: A) Adopt Resolution No. 90 - XX
supporting the use of the City's name in lieu of the
delivery post office name for those residents and
businesses located in 91789; and/or B) adopt Resolution
No. 90 - XX petitioning the United States Postal Service
to establish an official post office station to serve the
City of Diamond Bar.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
11. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION: Presentation of Certificate
of Appreciation to Ivan Nyal, former Chairman of the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
12. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the week of January 11 - 21,
1991 as Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday Week in the City
of Diamond Bar.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 90 - XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR
THE DONATION OF THE VHF RADIO REPEATER STATION BY THE
PEOPLE OF DIAMOND BAR.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90 - XX
expressing appreciation for the donation of the VHF Radio
Repeater Station.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 4 DECEMBER 18, 1990
OLD BUSINESS
14. PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION VACANCY/APPOINTMENT -
Appoint to fill vacancy left by Donald C. Nardella and
swear in appointee.
15. RESOLUTION NO. 89-97D: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL - Amending
the Conflict of Interest Code to provide for consultants,
ad hoc committees, task forces and similar groups.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90-97D amending
the City's Conflict of Interest Code.
NEW BUSINESS
3.6. HISTORICAL COMMITTEE - As requested by Mayor Pro Tem
Forbing, consider establishment of a Historical
Committee to inventory and retain historically valuable
material.
Recommended Action: Establish a Historical Committee to
collect, inventory and retain photographs, documents and
objects/items of possible historical significance.
17. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS - Appointment to Committees formerly
held by Councilman Paul V. Horcher:
Southeast Mosquito Abatement District
Sister Cities International
City of Industry Liaison
Personnel Committee
Finance Committee
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matters
can be heard.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 90 - RB - SOLID WASTE PERMIT FEES - In
order to offset the costs of preparing, adopting and
implementing an integrated waste management program, as
required under AB 939, the State Legislature has provided
a mechanism by which the City may impose fees for the
collection and disposal of solid wastes. Authorization
for these fees is provided in Section 41902 of the Public
Resources Code.
Recommended Action: Receive public testimony and adopt
Resolution No. 90 - XX establishing solid waste permit
fees and direct staff as necessary.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAGE 5 DECEMBER 18, 1990
ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember
to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at the next
regular meeting
ADJOURNMENT
I, LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was
introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Diamond Bar held on the -2Dth day of
—FA}-,rnary , 1990, and
was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar held on the
tith day of _Marc -h
1990, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
Forbin g, Horcher, Miller
NOES:Mayor
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
and
Pro Tem Werner
Mayor Papen
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
None
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
None
ATTEST:
City Clefk of the City of D:_amond Bar
L\1012\DBR1:FUSE\DB 5.5 (Disc)
37
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
NOVEMBER 29, 1990
CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 1:18
p.m. in Room 163 of the Ramada Inn, 259 Gentle
Springs Road, Diamond Bar.
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Papen, Horcher and Kim, Mayor Pro
Tem Forbing and Mayor Werner.
Also present were Assistant City Manager Terrence
L. Belanger, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski,
City Planner James DeStefano and City Clerk Lynda
Burgess.
CA/Arczynski announced that the meeting would be
adjourned to Closed Session to discuss personnel
and property acquisition items regarding Site "D".
CLOSED SESSION: M/Werner recessed the meeting at 1:20 p.m.
RECONVENED: M/Werner reconvened the meeting at 1:50 p.m.
COUNCIL COMMENTS: No Council comments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: No public comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
C/Papen moved, seconded by C/Kim to approve the
Consent Calendar with amendments to the Minutes of
November 6 and November 13, 1990. Motion carried
by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Kim, Horcher, Papen,
MPT/Forbing, M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
OLD BUSINESS:
Ordinance 16
(1990)
CA/Arczynski presented for 2nd reading by title
Directing that
only, Ordinance No. 16 (1990) entitled AN
ORDINANCE
Gen. Muni.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Elections be held
DIAMOND BAR DIRECTING THAT GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTIONS OF THE
on the Day of
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BE HELD ON
THE DAY OF SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTIONS.
School District
Elections
C/Kim moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to waive full
reading of Ordinance No. 16 (1990). With
consensus of Council, the motion carried.
Following discussion regarding continuing the
matter to December 4, 1990, MPT/Forbing moved,
C/Horcher seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 16
(1990). Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
NOVEMBER 29, 1990 PAGE 2
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Horcher, MPT/
Forbing, M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
Zip Code Update Admin. Analyst Troy Butzlaff stated that
staff, along with Congressman David Dreier,
has been trying to resolve the zip code
dispute with the post office. He explained
that a reply was received from the postal
service last July denying said request.
Staff has since contacted representatives
from other municipalities having similar
difficulties in an attempt to approach the
issue on a regional level. He recommended
consideration of three draft resolutions
included in the staff report. He further
indicated that Mark Martinez, regional
section manager for the Alhambra Post Office,
was considering allowing residents in Area
"A" to use Diamond Bar on their mail rather
than Walnut.
MPT/Forbing recommended adoption of
Resolution No. 1 and recommended that the
postal service be encouraged to change the
Diamond Bar sub -station to a full post office
with a postmaster and bulk mail and move the
11 carrier routes from the Walnut station to
the Diamond Bar station.
Following discussion, staff was directed to
Place Resolutions 1 and 3 on the Agenda for
the meeting of December 18, 1990.
NEW BUSINESS:
Parks & Rec. M/Werner nominated Mr. David Meyer to fill
Commission the unexpired term of Ivan Nyal, Parks and
Vacancy Recreation Commission. With consensus of
Council, the motion carried.
City Council M/Werner advised that interviews of City
Interviews Council candidates to fill the unexpired term
left by Paul V. Horcher would take place
between 2:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M. He stated
that there would be 2 minutes for intro-
ductions and 8 minutes for questions and
answers.
The following candidates were interviewed:
Joseph Anthony, D.D.S., Oral Surgeon.
NOVEMBER 29, 1990 PAGE 3
Clair Harmony, M.A. in Public Administration, 14
years in public management, City Manager and Asst.
City Manager, General Manager of property,
publisher of a newsletter for City Managers and
consultant to Southern California cities, Vice -
Chairman of the Planning Commission.
Don Nardella, Attorney at Law (real estate and
business).
Tom Ortiz, retired law enforcement officer.
Lydia Plunk, homemaker.
Cindee Quan, elementary teacher, Walnut Valley
Unified School District.
Gary Miller, developer (not in attendance due to
recent surgery)
RECESS M/Werner recessed the meeting at 3:25
p.m.
RECONVENE M/Werner reconvened the meeting at 3:35
p.m.
Following the conclusion of the interviews,
M/Werner began a question and answer period with
the candidates.
RECESS
With the conclusion of the question and answer
period, M/Werner thanked each of the nominees for
their participation
and recessed the meeting at
4:45 p.m.
RECONVENE
M/Werner reconvened the meeting at 5:05 p.m.
C/Horcher absent.
JOINT MEETING
COUNCIL/COMMISSION:
Capital
Improvement
PD/DeStefano presented the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for discussion
Program
and stated that the
CIP the multi-year schedulingof
c al
improvements based on fiscal resourcesand ythe
choice of what and where public improvements
should be located. The
CIP budget includes the
facilities programmed for the next fiscal
year.
The benefits of a CIP are varied: (1) assurance
that projects will be
carried out; (2) better
scheduling of public improvements; (3) purchase of
land before costs go up; (4) examining long-range
financial planning for
programs in mind; (5)
avoiding street construction one year and sewer
projects tearing up the same street the next year;
(6) public participation
and better overall
management of city affairs. He further discussed
the
various methods of financing: (1) pay as you
NOVEMBER 29, 1990 PAGE 4
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
go; (2) general obligation bonds; (3) revenue
bonds; (4) lease purchase; (5) special
districts; (6) benefit assessment districts;
(7) state and federal funds; (8) tax
increment financing.
M/Werner then introduced each of the
Commissioners in attendance: Planning
Commission - Clair Harmony and Grace Linn;
Traffic & Transportation Commission - Don
Gravdahl, Todd Chavers and Tom Ortiz; Parks
Recreation Commission - Don Nardella, Joe
Ruzicka and Gary Stitt.
Asst. CE/Jack Istik stated that a recommenda-
tion to award a contract for preparation of
the Circulation Element of the General Plan
will be presented on December 4, 1990. The
consultant could then make CIP recommenda-
tions in March 1991.
Following discussion,
take the CIP proposals
Commissions. Further
will take place after
agreed on priorities.
M/Werner requested t
City stationery to b
Society to promote a
solicit participants
decision was reached
staff was directed to
to each of the
review by the Council
the Commissions have
hat the Council allow
e used by the Leukemia
fund-raising luncheon to
in the event. No
on this matter.
With no further business to conduct, M/Werner
adjourned the meeting at 6:25 p.m.
Mayor
f
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DECEMBER 4, 1990
CALL TO ORDER:
M/Werner called the meeting to order at 6:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S.
Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE:
by C/Kim.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Papen and Kim, Mayor Pro Tem
Forbing and Mayor Werner.
Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort,
City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski, Assistant City
Manager Terrence L. Belanger, City Planner James
DeStefano, City Engineer Sid Musavi, and City
Clerk Lynda Burgess.
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
C/Papen announced that on Friday, December 7th,
the City will host a meeting of the State
Commission on Aging at the Days Hotel. Mr. John
Fleming, a resident of Diamond Bar, is a member of
the Commission.
M/Werner stated that on December 3rd, he and CM/
Van Nort attended the swearing-in ceremony for
Assemblyman Paul Horcher.
PUBLIC' COMMENTS:
Mr. Don Gravdahl, 23988 Minnequa Dr., stated that
he had received several solicitation calls on his
unlisted telephone number and felt that there
should be a way to monitor these groups to
determine how much of the funds actually go to
charity. He also indicated that there should be
some kind of City system to monitor organizations
soliciting door-to-door.
Mr. John Fleming, resident and member of the State
Commission on Aging, invited the City Council to
the Commission on Aging Meeting at 8:30 a.m. on
December 7, 1990 at the Days Hotel.
Mr. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., stated that
while traveling through San Luis Obispo County,
highway signs were posted indicating "Litter
Removal next two miles." The Calif. Highway
Patrol stated that CalTrans has implemented a
program throughout the State requesting businesses
to adopt a stretch of the highway to control
litter. He suggested that the City look into the
concept.
CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Kim moved, seconded by MPT/Forbing to approve
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
DECEMBER 4, 1990
Warrant Register
Treasurer's
Report
Traffic & Trans.
Commis. Minutes
Planning Commis.
Minutes
PAGE 2
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Papen, Kim, MPT/
Forbing, M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
Approved Warrant Register dated December 4,
1990 in the amount of $457,080.24.
Approved Treasurer's Report for the month of
October, 1990.
Received and filed Traffic & Transportation
Commission Minutes of October 11, 1990.
Received and filed Planning Commission
Minutes of August 13, August 27 and September
10, 1990.
Parks & Rec.
Commis. Minutes
Received and filed Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes of July 2, July 12 and
July 26, 1990.
Bond Exoneration
Road Improvements
Approved work completed and exonerated Surety
Bond
Tract No. 36813
No. ASI 100 092 in the amount of
$198,450 for
road improvements, vicinity of
Golden Springs and Diamond
Bar Blvd.
Resolution '90-96
Rqstg. Bd. of Sups.
Adopted Resolution No. 90-96 entitled: A
RESOLUTION
to Accept Transfer
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA,
& Conveyance of
REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
Storm Drain Imps.
known as P.D. 1812,
THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
Unit I
CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID
DISTRICT A TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PRIVATE DRAIN
NO. 1812 UNIT I IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
FOR FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,
REPAIR AND
IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER
AND
CONVEYANCE THEREOF.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
Proclamation - Dec.,
1990 "Strap Your
Proclaimed the Month of December, 1990 as
"Strap
Water Heater Month"
Your Water Heater Month" in conjunc-
tion with the
year-long Earthquake Survival
Program.
Swearing -In - Parks
& Rec. Commissioner
M/Werner swore in David D. Meyer as the new
Parks
David D. Meyer
and Recreation Commissioner to complete
the unexpired term
of Ivan Nyal.
DECEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 3
OLD BUSINESS:
Traffic Circ. ACM/Belanger recommended that a contract be
Element RFP awarded to DKS Associates for preparation of the
Award of Contract Traffic Circulation Element and that $125,000
to DKS Assoc. of unappropriated General Funds, Prop A, Prop 111
and/or other pertinent reserves be allocated to
fund the cost of preparation.
Mr. Todd Chavers, 23816 Chinook P1., Traffic and
Transportation Commissioner, stated that he had
participated in the selection process and urged
the Council to endorse staff's recommendation and
award the contract to DKS Associates.
Following discussion, C/Kim moved, C/Papen
seconded to award a contract to DKS Associates for
the preparation of the Traffic Circulation Element
and allocate funds in the amount of $125,000 for
preparation of said element. Motion carried by
the following Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Kim, Papen, MPT/Forbing,
M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEN - None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
Resignation of
Councilman
M/Werner stated that a letter dated November 30,
Paul V. Horcher
1990 had been received from former Councilmember
Paul Horcher tendering his
resignation effective
December 2, 1990.
CA/Arczynski stated that Council should accept the
letter of resignation
and declare Mr. Horcher's
Council seat vacant.
M/Werner moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to accept the
resignation and declare the seat held by
Councilman Horcher as vacant. With consensus of
Council, motion carried.
Consideration of
Appoint:. to Fill
M/Werner stated that the Council has 30 days from
the date
Council. Vacancy
of a resignation to appoint to fill a
vacant Council seat. If
an appointment is not
made within that time, the City would conduct
an
election to fill the vacancy; in this case, it
would be held in
June 1991. He further stated
that each Councilmember had had
an opportunity to
nominate two persons and that at the Council
meeting of November 29, 1990, six of the seven
nominees were interviewed.
C/Papen stated that she did not nominate any
candidates because she supported calling an for an
election.
However, due to comments by the City
DECEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 4
Attorney regarding abstain voting, she was
forced to vote on this issue.
C/Kim moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to close
the nominations to only those seven
previously nominated. With the following
Roll Call vote, the motion carried:
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Kim, MPT/Forbing,
M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEN - Papen
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
CA/Arczynski stated that it would be appro-
priate to have a motion and second on a
particular person to fill the vacancy and
then conduct a roll call vote. If the
necessary votes are not obtained, then
another candidate would be nominated.
C/Kim suggested that the list be narrowed
down and from that a candidate be appointed.
M/Werner moved to appoint Clair Harmony.
Motion died for lack of second.
Following further discussion, M/Werner again
moved to appoint Clair Harmony. Motion died
for lack of second.
C/Kim moved, C/Papen seconded to appoint Gary
Miller. With the following Roll Call vote,
the motion failed due to a tie.
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Papen, Kim
NOES: COUNCILMEN - MPT/Forbing,
M/Werner
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
C/Kim moved to appoint Tom Ortiz. Motion
died for lack of a second.
M/Werner moved to appoint Lydia Plunk.
Motion died for lack of a second.
C/Kim moved to appoint Cindee Quan. Motion
died for lack of a second.
MPT/Forbing moved, M/Werner seconded to
appoint Donald C. Nardella. With the
following Roll Call vote, the motion carried:
DECEMBER 4, 1990
PAGE 5
AYES: COUNCILMEN - Kim, MPT/Forbing,
M/Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEN - Papen
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None
MPT/Forbing administered the Oath of Office to Mr.
Nardella.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
C/Kim stated that it had been an experience going
through the Council vacancy process and that he
was impressed by the amount of people willing to
serve the City. He requested that staff research
the possibility of limiting terms so that more
people have an opportunity to serve the City.
CA/Arczynski explained that since the City is a
General Law City, State law does not provide for
restricting the number of terms a Councilmember
can serve.
CLOSET) SESSION:
M/Werner adjourned the meeting to Closed Session
at 7:10 p.m.
RECONVENE:
M/Werner reconvened Regular Session at 7:45 p.m.
and declared that there was no reportable action
taken during the Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to conduct,
M/Werner adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. to
6:00 p.m. on December 18, 1990.
LYNDA BURGESS
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Mayor
MINUTES OF THE PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 23, 1990
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chairman Don Nardella called the meeting
to order at 6:38 p.m. at the Community Room,
1061 Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of
Allegiance by Commissioner Joe Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Ruzicka, Stitt and Vice
Chairman Nardella. Chairman Nyal arrived at
6:45 p.m. C/Whelan was absent (excused).
Also present were Parks and Maintenance
Director Charles Janiel and Clerk Typist
Christine Haraksin.
MATTERS FROM THE
AUDIENCE:
Clarence Broski, 1508 Gide Court, Diamond
Bar, boarders Maple Hill Park, third time he
has made a petition in order to have the
Commission attempt to put a fence around that
park. There has been vandalism on his
property because of kids coming across his
barricades into his backyard. A fence is the
usual protection for the residents around the
park. Mr Broski stated he has only seen the
hills
watered once this year and the trees
have started to die.
He understands the need
for cutting back water but the hill should be
watered a little more frequently or at least
sufficient enough in order to keep the trees
from dying. He stated before the County put
in a park, he observed in the plot maps that
at one time they did have a fence to be put
in around the park, but it was a cost saving
item.
Mr. Janiel stated that the fence is budgeted
for this year and will also be installed this
year.
VC/Nardella directed staff to check all
controllers and sprinkler pipes on the hills
at Maple Hill Park.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of C/Stitt moved and Chair/Nyal seconded. With
July 26, 1990 and the consensus of the Commission the motion
August 9, 1990 was passed to accept the Minutes of July 26,
1990 and August 9, 1990.
August 23, 1990 Page 2
REPORTS:
Oral report from VC/Nardella stated there was no action taken
Recreation Advisory at the Recreation Advisory Board Meeting.
Board Committee: There was tentative approval for the Fall
Program but still discussing budget items
regarding park monitors. Also, there is a
tentative approval on having a Saturday
program at Ronald Reagan Park.
VC/Nardella stated that Walnut Valley Unified
will be making an increase of 50% in their
use of facilities. The charge per child at
this time is $5.00 per child and will
increase to $7.50. This is per Dr. Brown.,
Superintendent of Walnut Valley Unified
School District.
CORRESPONDENCE:
Pomona Unified School Commission discussed the pricing of the up -
District - Upgrading grading of fields and their one point of
of athletic fields: concern was the stadium seating of $100.00
per seat. The Commission stated that stadium
seating was not necessary and would be more
beneficial to have portable bleacher seating.
VC/Nardella stated the Commission is trying
to make a determination of we as a Community
feel we need. From a City stand point we can
identify available resources and figure out
how to best meet those needs. VC/Nardella
asked if the second letter to the sports
groups regarding their needs have gone out?
Charles Janiel stated he has provided Kellee
with a copy of the letter that was sent out
and she said it is going to be incorporated
into the survey.
Bill Plank, 1343 North Glenn Avenue, Pomona
is the Director of the Diamond Bar/Walnut
Youth Basketball. He has been involved in
the basketball league for about 15 years and
spoke regarding the need for more facilities,
whether it be new facilities or the upgrading
of others. His program is not restricted to
just Walnut and Diamond Bar, though 70% of
the sign ups are from the City of Diamond
Bar.
Augusit 23, 1990 Page 3
Charles Janiel stated that the City staff is
beginning looking into developing a Capital
Improvement Program. These priorities will
be put in what is called a 5 Year Capital
Improvement Plan that is available to the
public every year.
VC/Nardella stated it was suggested some time
ago that staff create a filing system
regarding the needs of each facility.
VC/Nardella asked if the requests of the
sports groups been entered into your list?
Charles Janiel stated that all correspondence
available at that time has been included in
the plan.
Correspondence from VC/Nardella stated that staff was asked to
Diamond Bar Pop thank Ms. Diamond for her input on the needs
Warner Football: of Diamond Bar Pop Warner on facilities and
usages.
Correspondence from VC/Nardella stated at the Recreation Advisory
Mr. & Mrs. Owens: Board Meeting the members were told that
Walnut Valley Unified decided to give the
Owen's a credit for the Fall term and the
situation was resolved. .
The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 and
readjourned at 7:33.
Correspondence from VC/Nardella summarized to the Commission Mr.
Mark Da.11i, Mad Dog Dalli's letter.
Tennis:
C/Stitt stated his concerns are if City
facilities are going to be used in order to
instruct these lessons, with the renting or
leasing of this property what would the
liabilities if any the City of Diamond Bar
would incur if anyone were injured during the
instruction. C/Stitt requested that more
information is needed from Mad Dog Tennis or
Mr. Dalli himself before the Commission can
go any further with this issue.
Chair/Nyal moved and Ruzicka seconded. With
the consensus of the Commission the motion
was passed to check back with the action
taken on the first letter and rewrite that
letter with the recent date and state that
August 23, 1990 Page 4
there is no change in the Commission's posi-
tion. Also have Mr. Dalli come back to the
Commission with more information as to justi-
fy and explain what is meant by so called
"Posers".
VC/Nardella stated since Mad Dog Tennis is a
community group he could have some input as
to what he feels the need for lighted tennis
facilities might be and the Commission could
add these needs and future needs into the
master planning. VC/Nardella also stated if
Mr. Dalli has the desire to teach in this
community, he might contact and schedule
teaching classes with Walnut Valley
Recreation and then the Commission could
reserve time for him at the parks.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
Open Space Tract Commission reviewed the
#42562: information. The
Commissioners questioned the usability of the
remainder of lot 7 Tract #31479. Within
their discussion there was a possibility of
negotiating with Bramelea to acquire more
usable park space in conjunction with this
proposal.
Heritage Park Building Charles Janiel stated that construction is to
Renovation Status: begin in 1992 and he has been quoted about
$200.00 per square foot for building improve-
ments at Heritage Park.
C/Stitt addressed the Commission with the
items discussed at the meeting with the
architects. The items discussed were termite
fumigation, repairs, needs for a new roof,
suspended ceiling with new light fixtures,
remove an interior wall to increase room
size, install panic bars on doors to bring it
UP to fire safety codes, rear exit, carpet,
new bathroom fixtures, various adjustments to
Plumbing and electricity and looking into air
conditioning as well.
VC/Nardella stated that he would take this
information back to the Recreation Advisory
Board and let them know that it will not be a
conflict in the use of the facility for the
parent participation preschool. They can
46
August 23, 1990 Page 5
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
anticipate to run this program for at least a
couple of years, should it be a break even
Potential which was instructed at one of the
Recreation Advisory Board Meetings.
C/Ruzicka received a survey from the National
Parks and Conservation Association and when
comparing this survey to the Commission's,
similar questions had been asked. This was
just for the Commission's information on
other surveys.
Chair/Nyal stated that at he has a home in
Diamond Bar and one in Apple Valley which
will be his permanent residence. He also
stated his intention is if the Commission and
City Council will allow him to continue on
the Parks and Recreation Commission he would
be honored, if not he would step down from
his position. He will still be conducting
business within the City of Diamond Bar and
approximately 80% of his time would be spent
in the City.
C/Stitt stated at the Joint Council Meeting
Sue Harmony asked if the Sylvan Glen signs
will be removed. Has the issue been
resolved?
Charles Janiel stated that staff is in the
process of getting signs made to replace the
old Sylvan Glen signs.
VC/Nardella informed the Commission on the
Recreation Advisory Board Meeting there were
questions about where the money would come
that Christine Adams was finding and would
have to reduce the Diamond Bar Program and
VC/Nardella asked if this meant we would be
cutting back to three days. No, there were
other monies that have been floating around
within the budget, that were not specifically
allocated for Diamond Bar Parks. Using those
monies Diamond Bar would still have the four
parks verses the three in Walnut but there is
still an additional $4,000 needed to find for
the park monitors. By changing the program
at Ronald Reagan Park from two hours a day to
August 23, 1990
ADJOURNMENT:
AT T:
i`
��— Chairman
Page 6
an 8 hour program on Saturday there would be
savings. VC/Nardella stated there would be a
final figure of monies after the next Recre-
ation Advisory Board Meeting.
With no further comments, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:33 p.m.
LL
Christine `Haraksin
Secretary
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
CALL TO ORDER: Commissioner Stitt called the meeting to order at
6:33 p.m. at City Hall, 21660 East Copley Drive,
Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE: OF The audience was led in the Pledge of
ALLEGIANCE: Allegiance by Commissioner Joe Ruzicka.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Ruzicka, Stitt and Whelan. Vice
Chairman Nardella arrived at 6:40 p.m. Chairman
Nyal arrived at 7:10 p.m.
Also present were Parks and Maintenance Director
Charles Janiel, Administrative Analyst Kellee
Fritzal, Superintendent Donald Hensley and Minute
Secretary Liz Myers.
MATTERS FROM THE None.
AUDIENCE:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minute; of
July 2, 1990
Minutes of
July 12, 1990
Commissioner Stitt presented the Consent Calendar.
C/Ruzicka moved and C/Stitt seconded. With the
consensus of the Commission the motion was passed
to approve the Consent Calendar.
VC/Nardella said he would like more
detailed minutes.
C/Ruzicka noted comments that were misappropri-
ately placed. He would like emphasized the
importance of prioritizing administrative tasks
and to have them properly reflected in the agenda.
C/Stitt moved and VC/Nardella seconded. With the
consensus of the Commission the motion was passed
to accept the Minutes of July 2, 1990.
It
reiterated his need for more
detailed minutes, particularly when future action
and/or decisions are involved.
C/Ruzicka wanted to know if there were any other
records of meetings to refer back to. AA/Fritzal
said that audio tapes are kept for one (1) year.
C/Ruzicka moved and C/Stitt seconded. With the
consensus of the Commission the motion was passed
to accept the Minutes of July 12, 1990.
Minutes of C/Ruzicka moved and C/Stitt seconded. With the
August 23, 1990: consensus of the Commission the motion was passed
to accept the Minutes of August 23, 1990.
September 13, 1990 Page 2
REPORTS:
Oral report from VC/Nardella summarized that Walnut Recreation
Advisory Valley Recreation (WVR) indicated they Board
Committee: would prefer quarterly formal meetings, and see
less formal monthly meetings, without mandatory
attendance. WVR believes their responsibilities
are limited to creating budgets and programs and
since the WVR program is to be terminated, it is
not necessary to meet on a regular basis.
AA/Fritzal stated that this issue will be brought
back before the Advisory Board Meeting to be voted
on in October. As of now, it is believed the WVR's
intended decision did not violate the true meaning
of the JPA because there will still be monthly
meetings. Council should be advised on the
proposed change.
VC/Nardella indicated he has no problem with less
formal meetings as long as WVR remains responsive
to informative requests. The meetings are a
valuable avenue for the Commissioners.
C/Whelan would like to see WVR make a presentation
at the Commissioners Study Session upon receiving
a request for information at the end of a formal
meeting. He also suggested giving WVR a week
leeway to gather information, to avoid a month
interim between responses.
VC/Nardella concurs, and adds the WVR meetings be
attended under that authority, and if necessary,
ask WVR to respond appropriately at the next
meeting.
Director/Janiel reminded the Commission that
decisions have to be made th"rough the entire body
of the Recreation Advisory Board and any action
involving JPA has to go through that board. The
Commission can continue to operate, gather
information, have monthly meetings, and be able to
take action on items with a quorum.
VC/Nardella showed concern that a quorum would not
be met if monthly meetings were not mandatory. A
formal meeting should be requested on specific
items. VC/Nardella also requests direction from
staff as to what information the WVR should be
asked to provide, and how responsive they will be.
September 13, 1990 Page 3
C/Ruzicka stresses that all possible resource
information concerning parks programs is'needed.
He questions the ability of the Commission to run
a parks program without important file information
from WVR.
AA/Fritzal stated discussions about "phasing in,
phasing out,, programs will be on the next agenda.
VC/Nardella notes a consensus among Commissioners
for a need to continue to participate.
VC/Nardella and C/Whelan will continue to attend
meetings.
VC/Nardella concludes it may be necessary to ask
WVR what kind of resource information is
available, and to bring a list of information to
the next meeting.
Heritage Park VC/Nardella reports about the outcome of the
Update: Heritage Park preschool and notes that everything
is moving well.
Park Monitoring VC/Nardella reports on the Park Monitoring Budget
Budget: in regard to the convergence to a Saturday
program, and the dollar amount saved.
Only Ronald Reagan Park will have a Saturday
program. Chris Adams concluded in her preliminary
cost analysis that an additional $2,500 will be
needed after the convergence.
VC/Nardella suggested to AA/Fritzal to make
reference to the letter from Dr. Brown stating
that the cost of adding a park is $10,000. Adams
originally had stated the cost to be around
$12,000. AA/Fritzal requests VC/Nardella's
figures on the cost savings, using only Ronald
Reagan Park. The figures will be included in the
next meeting agenda along with the status of the
Park Monitoring Budget.
VC/Nardella stated that the Board did approve the
reallocation of the monies within the budget to
offset our Park Monitoring costs. No dollar
amount was given.
ORAL REPORT FROM Superintendent/Hensley reported that GTE is
DON HENSLEY willing to put in a phone at Heritage Park on a
PARK TEI.,EPHONES: trial basis for one year. GTE will maintain it,
be responsible for collecting the monies and keep
September 13, 1990 Page 4
it in operation. Diamond Bar will receive 15% of
monies collected.
Superintendent/Hensley requested the telephone be
able to use 911 and call out only, as was his
understanding of what the Commission requested.
The Commission preferred this type of call
blocking to discourage drug dealings. GTE wants a
release from liability to be signed because there
is no call back for 911 calls.
Superintendent/Hensley noted the installation is
being done at no cost to the City. The idea is to
eventually do all the parks.
VC/Nardella has directed staff to find out where
the 15% of monies collected will go. He further
directs staff to review the GTE agreement with
the city attorney and return it to the Commission.
CORRESPONDENCE:
Letter to Mark
Dali, Mad Dog
The letter
facilities
was in regard to the use of City
Tennis:
has already
for business activities. Chair/Nyal
signed
objections
the letter and there were no
noted except the "Committee"
the letter
word in
should be changed to read "Commission".
Letter to R.L.
Winningham:
The letter
was in response to suggestions and
concerns made to the Commission. Chair/Nyal
signed the
letter. There were no objections.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
"Understanding
the Media"
"A practical
guide to assist Cities in dealing
with their
made.
local news media". No comments were
Update on Prop B. C/Stitt would like to know if the City or the
L.A. County Safe Commission is to endorse the letter or is it
Neighborhood Parks strictly information only.
Act:
Chair/Nyal responded that unless otherwise
directed, take it as information only.
Recreation All opportunities available to the City concerning
Update: recreation services are being considered.
AA/Fritzal announced contracting with the City of
Walnut for recreation services is unavailable.
She stated that City Manager Van Nort had a
September 13, 1990
Page 5
conversation with Linda Holmes, City Manager of
Walnut. Walnut does not want to provide Diamond
Bar with recreation services. The Commissioners
from Walnut felt both cities were very different
in their needs and requirements for recreation.
AA/Fritzal asked the Commissioners to write down
their expectations for recreation programs and
deliver them to her as soon as possible. She
recommends the recreation programs start off on a
small scale and slowly escalate.
VC/Nardella is concerned about the loss of
$130,000 out of the original budget (if the Day
Care Program is not continued). However, the Day
Care issue has not been resolved.
AA/Fritzal explained to the Commissioners that by
knowing their expectations in regards to
recreation programs, she would then know whose
services would best fulfill their needs.
C/Whelan stated that at one of the JPA meetings,
the Commission asked for a report on other
communities recreation programs. The information
would help in making decisions on which programs
to consider implementing in the City.
VC/Nardella directed staff to have the recreation
report available at the next RAB meeting, which is
prior to the next Commission meeting.
AA/Fritzal stated that by October 1, 1990, she
hopes to send a copy of her report (a complete
analysis of all opportunities, including costs) to
each Commissioner. On October 11, the Commission
would then make a recommendation on which
direction staff should follow. Negotiations will
then begin.
VC/Nardella wants to know if the Commission should
assume the money from Proposition A and the
$189,000 is available.
This will be negotiated with the contractor and
City Council.
C/Whelan is concerned about the lack of monetary
information to base decisions. AA/Fritzal states
negotiation will be based on the Commissions
Prioritized recommendations.
September 13, 1990 Page 6
Joint Powers AA/Fritzal states the JPA is being reviewed at a
Agreement: staff level. They have received JPA's from 6
cities. Pomona Unified School District looks very
cooperative.
Chair/Nyal would like to know when the County
signs will be removed.
Director/Janiel assures the Commission that the
signs will be replaced at the parks and the
entrances to the city.
Chair/Nyal wants the Commission to be part of the
beautify cation of the City.
Director/Janiel informs Chair/Nyal that normally
there is a beautification committee that would
handle these issues.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further comments,
adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Attest���
airman
the meeting was
Elizabeth Myers /
Data Forms Management
AA/Fritzal states that a JPA will be brought back
to the Commission for input
before anything is
signed.
Roles and
Resources:
VC/Nardella questions the functions of the Commis -
sion and the staff resources that are available to
enable them to make decisions.
He further asks
for a special meeting be held to formally lay out
their directives and the means to accomplish them.
Survey Form:
AA/Fritzal informed the Commission that the Parks
and Recreation Needs Survey will be in the
Windmill, the Highlander and in the Chamber of
Commerce newsletter. The Commissioners are asked
to help disperse the
Survey throughout the
community.
COMMISSIONER
COMMENTS:
Chair/Nyal asks if the moratorium is over at
Peterson Park.
Director/Janiel says there is no lifting of the
moratorium.
Chair/Nyal would like to know when the County
signs will be removed.
Director/Janiel assures the Commission that the
signs will be replaced at the parks and the
entrances to the city.
Chair/Nyal wants the Commission to be part of the
beautify cation of the City.
Director/Janiel informs Chair/Nyal that normally
there is a beautification committee that would
handle these issues.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further comments,
adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Attest���
airman
the meeting was
Elizabeth Myers /
Data Forms Management
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 1990
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Schey called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. in the Walnut Valley School District Board
Meeting Room, 880 South Lemon Street, Walnut,
California.
PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance
ALLEGIANCE: by Vice Chairman Harmony.
ROLL CALL: Commissioner Grothe, Commissioner Lin, Commissioner
MacBride, Vice Chairman Harmony, and Chairman
Schey.
MATTERS FROM THE
AUDIENCE:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Also present were Assistant City Engineer Jack
Istek, Interim Planning Director Irwin Kaplan,
Planning Director James DeStefano, Associate
Planning Director Robert Searcy, and Secretary
(contract) Liz Myers.
There were none.
No items appear.
PUBLIC. HEARING ITEMS:
(cont. from Sept. Chair/Schey asks for a staff report.
10) Tentative
tract 47722 and
Conditional Use
James DeStefano, Planning Director, provides the
Commission with
Permit./Oak Tree
a request for continuance until an
appropriate meeting date. Staff has
89-338
met twice
with the Consultant since the last hearing. They
are in the process of preparing additional material
for the continued hearing. In
anticipation of a
continuance, the staff has deferred mailing out
notices to the neighbors, as requested by the
Commission, until notification
of the next hearing
date. It is recommended the Commission take
advantage of the continued hearing to discuss
concerns to be addressed in the EIR arising from
the Hillside Symposium. The
applicants request for
a continuance was not in writing.
Don King, representative of Frank Piermarini,
residing at 1254
Berrying St., Claremont, requested
a continuance, to
give both staff and applicant
more time to prepare.
Chair/Schey asked staff to outline the items to be
discussed.
James DeStefano gave the Commission some concerns
to be discussed.
They include ways to reduce
grading, the length of time the
earth movers will
I
September 24, 1990
Page 2
be required, the absence of response from important
agencies to needed documents, and the questioning
of a record of the change in site, in reference to
the Blue Line Stream.
Don King states one item staff felt to be important
was the visual analysis identifying the
characteristics of the site when viewed from a
distances. This will require, from the applicant,
an additional photo survey and a verbal analysis of
what the changes would be subsequent to the
development. In answer to the concern of records
kept, in an event of a change, Don King responds
their intent to replace the page completely, date
it, and copy it on different colored paper whenever
there is an addition or text change in the EIR.
Irwin Kaplan, Interim Planning Director, states one
of the issues implied was to come up with a plan
with minimal grading and some visual protection of
the ridgeline.
C/Grothe wants the whole project to fall into
conformity with The Country. The general feeling,
received from the General Plan Committee, was to
develop separate design guidelines and general
plans for residential and rural residential.
Chair/Schey stated the
September 21, addressed
grading:
1. Land form grading -
forms on manufactured
2. Construction methods
path
3
Hillside Seminar, on
methods of minimizing
recreate more natural
slopes.
- minimize size of the
Architectural designs - minimizes the visual
impact of the home against the hillside.
i
Chair/Schey would like the applicant to follow the
aforementioned guidelines.
C/Grothe pointed out the Commission unofficially
adopted oak tree replacement standards, and would
like to verify the requirements.
James DeStefano states the requirement is a 2 to 1
ratio with 15 gallon or 24" box replacement. The
applicant has offered a 3 to 1 ratio with 24"
boxes. In replacing the trees, it is proposed to
use a variety of trees in both sizes and types.
VC/Harmony is concerned about the elevation
differentials, the notification of the gas company,
the size of the grading, and the visual
September 24, 3.990 Page 3
impact of the project. He also wanted to know
what steps the applicant will take to prevent the
negative effects of the earthmovers. VC/Harmony
noticed the Piermarini development at the front
gate at Grand Ave. appears dense, and is concerned
with the concept of permeability. He also indi-
cated the need for contour maps.
Irwin Kaplan concurred the present maps are
indistinguishable and requested applicant for
easier to read maps. He suggested to the
Commission to consider a single standard for all
streets, allowing for future developments.
Chair/Schey felt it shows prudence in keeping the
good faith with the maintenance of the street in
the future. He agreed the single street standards
are an appropriate condition of approval.
C/Lin requested a report from the applicant on
which trees will be replaced in order to project
future appearance.
C/Grothe stated, in his opinion, the Diamond Bar
Boulevard entrance development to The Country, is
detrimental to the Community because of its,
density. He felt the City may need separate codes
for individual tract homes.
Chair/Schey questioned how to reconcile the review
for the creation of similar projects in the future.
He stated the City is operating under the old
County codes no longer appropriate, and
uncomfortable preceding with the project in the
Hillside without standards to develop continuity.
Chair/Schey asked staff how the Commission can
proceed with the creation of the developmental
code.
Irwin Kaplan, in response to Chair/Schey, stated
there are several ways to proceed:
1. Condition Use Permit
2. Deny the applicant
3 D
eve -Lop an Interim Ordinance
4. Develop a Permanent Ordinance
Irwin Kaplan suggested to the Commission to
institute a code under an interim bases thereby
giving the needed time to later tailor a Permanent
Ordinance to Diamond Bars' needs.
C/MacBride wanted to pursue the Interim Ordinance
because it creates a sense of discipline.
September 24, 1990 Page 4
Chair/Schey understands the Interim Ordinance deals
with the hillside development, in this case The
Country, and wouldn't impact the City in general.
C/Grothe thought the people working on the General
Plan Committee were very distinctive on having a
separation of residential and rural areas. He felt
The Country is nice but out of the price level for
most people, and he is not sure, very large estate
homes, is totally Diamond Bar. He recommended
building to the varying levels of economics and
suggests two (2) distinctive plans in the Interim
Ordinances.
Irwin Kaplan reminded the Commission the objective
of the Interim Ordinance is to do it quickly and
buy time for the Commissioners to tailor the
Ordinance at a future date to various projects.
Chair/Schey asked staff the length of time needed
to draft an Interim Ordinance.
Irwin Kaplan responded any tailoring of the
Ordinance is more difficult, therefore longer, but
will bring something for consideration quickly.
Irwin Kaplan then informed the Commission that
though we have a task policy not to issue permits
without a plan reviewed by the Commission, it is
not an explicit policy. He stated grading permits
could be issued without having any plans for
development and suggest the policy be written
explicitly.
There being no one wishing to speak further, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
Motioni was made by VC/Harmony, seconded by
Chair/Schey and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to continue,
with the concurrence of the applicant, till the
next regular Planning Commission hearing on October
8, 1990.
Chair/Schey noted the issues, the Commissioners
seem to concur on, for the Interim Ordinance:
1. minimize grading
2. minimize path sizes
3. utilize grading techniques
4. utilize construction methods
5. utilize architectural designs compatible with
the hillside
6. utilize landscape plans that approximate
nature
September 24, 1990 Page 5
7. no grading permit issued without a company
development permit properly approved
8. single street standards without regard to
public or private status
9. erosion control methods will be made a part of
the plan approval
10. the plan be subject to an aesthetic review to
include any man made structures
11. to include any item staff may include
Motion was made by VC/Harmony, seconded by
C/MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to make a
recommendation to the City Council that the City
adopt an Interim Ordinance controlling the
development of the Hillside areas and incorporating
the certain issues identified earlier.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
Tentative Public Chair/Schey asked for the staff report.
Hearing Dates for
Tentative Tracts James DeStefano reported the staff has tentatively
47850,47851,48487, outlined the schedule of events leading up to
and 45290 for a public hearing review. These include
Proposed creation of the SEATAC to review significant the
Subdivisions. ecological concerns existing where the projects are
proposed; the change in the November 19, 1990
hearing date to November 26, 1990; and a companion
memo from Mr. Kaplan to discuss the components of
the SEATAC.
Rob Searcy, Associate Planning Director, in
response to Chair/Schey, identifies the tracts:
47850, 47851,and 48487 to be a total of 120 units
adjacent to The Country including a remnant tract
located in the same EIR; and 45290 to be a total of
28 units, to include the Arsearo, Marlborough, Burn
Hallows and Autumn Glow projects.
Significant
Ecological Area
Irwin Kaplan summarized the SEATAC. He stated the
SEA (Significant
Technical Advisory
Ecological Area) existing in
Diamond Bar, is the
Committee (SEATAC),
Citys responsibility and
requires a SEATAC
review in conjunction with a
development application. The
recommendations
delivered by the SEATAC, serve as advisory elements
to
the Planning Commission. There is no formula
for the composition
of a SEATAC, therefore we need
to develop our own mechanism. The County has
designated the Tonner Canyon/Chino Hills an SEA
area. As of now, there is a proposal for the
development
of 120 dwelling units on 160 acres in
Tonner Canyon. Mr. Kaplan has been
assembling
names of technical experts in various disciplines
which
relate to the ecology of Tonner Canyon. He
September 24, 1990
Page 6
asked, of the Commission, suggestions of people who
might serve on SEATAC, and felt a 5 person
committee would provide an appropriate range of
talent.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: There were none.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Vice Chairman Harmon
ed
by Commissioner MacBride and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLYtoadjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
vid Schey
At est: Chairman
Ja s DeStefa o
Secretary/Pla ning Commission
October 8,, 1990
Page 2
Dan Buffington, 2605 Indian Creek, asked if the item
under New Business (Interim
Development Control Ordinance
Draft) included the Hillside Development. The
Commission
informed him it was included.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
Tentative Tract
47722 and CUP/OT
Chair/Schey asked for the staff report.
89-338:
James DeStefano stated the project before the Commission
is
an application by Piermarini Enterprises, Inc. to
subdivide
a 19 acre site into 16 residential lots. He
explained a Conditional
Use Permit is required for the
Hillside Management Review because the bulk of the site
exceeds a 25% slope ratio, and an Oak Tree Permit is
required, because of the
removal of approximately ten Oak
trees. He included the Environmental
Impact Report for
the Commissions review. He stated, at the request of the
Planning Commission,
new notices of the public hearing
was mailed, to
approximately 130 property owners of
record surrounding the proposed development site,
October 4, 1990. on
James DeStefano summarized the staff report to the
Commission:
1. Lot Size - The zoning for the project is R-1-10,000
and the Community Plan designation is for non -urban
residential (one unit or less per acre). There are
16 lots on 19 acres which translates to 1.18 acres
per lot, and the lots range in actual size from .42
acres to 2.51 acres. All lots comply with the
Community Plan when lot averages are calculated
but, in the opinion of the staff, this practice is
not a favorable method of achieving the intent of
the non -urban designation.
2. Density/Grading - The density of the hillside
development has a direct impact on the quantity of
grading required. This particular project has a
remedi4l grading of 80,000 cubic yards necessary
regardless of the number of units proposed on the
site. The project is proposing 16 units, which
will require a grading of 204,000 cubic yards of
dirt. The current ordinance requires a low density
threshold calculation for the development in non
urban hillside management areas and the Community
Plan establishes the maximum permitted density.
When using the low density threshold calculation,
the low density threshold equates to 2.35 units on
19 acres.
3. Roadways - There is a cul-de-sac proposed,
extending 1620 feet from the intersection with
Derringer Lane to the terminus of Lane "Bit
(excluding the primary access service road serving
lots 5 and 6). The site plan indicates slopes of
October 8, 1990 Page 3
UP to 150. Driveways have pavement widths which
varies from 16 feet to 20 feet. The parcels with
driveway access have the required frontage on the
main road, but not the driveway access needed
because of grade differences between the road and
the building pad.
4. Oak Trees - The existing ordinance requires 2 oak
trees be replaced for every one oak tree removed.
The Planning Commission has established an oak tree
replacement policy that exceeds the minimum
requirements. The 10 oak trees identified for
removal would be replaced with 30 oak trees with
24" minimum box size.
5. EIR - DG King Associates has been retained by the
applicant as its environmental consultant and the
DEIR was prepared by them. The EIR assesses the
potential physical environmental impacts associated
with the proposed project. To initiate the
environmental review process, the City staff
prepared an initial study, which is a checklist
establishing the technical focus of the DEIR. A
notice of preparation was prepared to inform
selected agencies of the project and to solicit
their comments or concerns. Those comments have
been incorporated and responded to within the EIR.
A draft EIR has been prepared and submitted to the
City for review and then a Notice of Completion, to
indicate the availability of the DEIR, will be
given to all the organizations and individuals who
had previously requested it. The effect upon the
environment must be taken into account when
considering a specific development project. The
California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA, states
public agencies should not approve projects
proposed if there are feasible alternatives or
feasible mitigation measures that would lessen the
significant effects upon the environment. If the
City finds changes or alterations in the project
are not feasible, or that the unavoidable
signif}cant environmental effects are acceptable,
there must be adequate evidence on the record to
support such a finding. The Government Code
Section 66474 requires the denial of a tentative
map by the Planning Commission when the design of
the sub -division or its improvements are likely to
cause substantial environmental damage.
6. Video - Helicopter ride around the City to view the
development in the immediate area as heading toward
the site. The helicopter flew over the site, then
swung around and returned in another direction,
enabling a front on view, matching the model.
7. Background - The site consists of hilly terrain. A
slope analysis indicates 6.17 acres are located on
slopes of 0 - 25%, 10.54 acres are found on
October 8, 1990 Page 4
slopes of 25-50%, and 2.38 acres exceed a 50%
slope. A 30" Southern California Gas Company high
pressure gas line traverses the southern portion of
the site. The applicant is proposing a subdivision
of 16 lots which will range in size from 18,400 sq.
ft. to 109,400 sq. ft. of lot area. Pad areas
range in size from 8,300 to 20,900 sq. ft. The
dwelling units planned for the pads would range
from 5,000 to 10,000 sq. ft. in size.
8. Discussion - Grading plans indicate a balanced cut
and fill of the site. No import of material will
be required. Export of some material is expected
to grub the site of natural grasses and various
trees. It is expected that grading utilizing
earthmovers will require 11 to 45 days to conclude
grading activities and the noise and dust
associated with such activity may be affected by
conditions such as weather and hours of operation.
Grading plans indicate the maximum height for cut
slopes is 80 feet and the maximum depth of the fill
is 95 feet. Slopes throughout the project site
will have a variable slope ratios of from 1 to 4
for crib walls proposed to 2 to 1 (2 feet of
horizontal space is required for each 1 foot in
vertical height). Adjacent to these slopes will
be the flat building pads which will be developed
for the construction of the residents. Access to
this site will be via Derringer Lane and
construction workers will commute daily. The
applicant has not identified where the construction
vehicles will park and remain during non -working
hours.
The staff has reviewed the developer's DEIR, including
several dozen revised pages of maps, charts, and the
latest text received October 2, 1990. As a result of the
review, staff maintained a high level of concern
regarding the adequacy of the DEIR. Staff felt the DEIR
does not appropriately address the inconsistency between
the proposed project and the Community Plan.
Summation of the variety of goals within the Community
Plan:
1.
Maintain the rural setting of the community.
2.
Minimizing
the
alteration of the natural terrain.
3.
Minimizing
the
alteration of the natural hillside.
4.
Preserving
the
major ridgeline.
5.
Minimizing
the
adverse visual impacts.
6.
Minimizing
grading.
7.
Protecting
the
visual quality of highly scenic
areas.
Staffs review of the DEIR:
October 8, 1990
Page 5
1. A complete review, of a "reasonable" alternative to
the project, is lacking. It was requested, from
the consultant, to have an analysis of alternative
densities on the site to protect the ridgeline,
reduce grading and come up with a development. The
applicant was asked three different alternatives be
examined: a 6 unit alternative; an 8 unit
alternative; and two unit alternative.
2. The DEIR identifies several significant impacts and
indicates the environmental effects can be reduced
to a level of insignificance, but alternative
project designs have not adequately been explored
in terms of further reducing impacts associated
with the project.
3. The grading techniques, and the extent of the
earth movement proposed, if approved, would
establish a new precedent and policy for hillside
development within the City. An examination, of
such a policy and its impacts, should be explored
in a cumulative environmental setting. The DEIR
does not adequately explore the cumulative impacts
of the proposed project.
4. The DEIR indicates the project will be a visual
boon both to the occupants and the viewers from
afar, with the proposed landscaping. The staff has
found no evidence in the DEIR which supports this
conclusion.
5. The determination of whether or not impacts are
significant and adverse is an issue for Commission
consideration. If the Commission determines there
will be significant adverse impacts, then it must
determine the benefits of the projects to the
Community, outweigh the adverse impacts,and
recommend to Council a Statement of Overriding
Considerations be made by the City Council before
approving the plan.
James DeStefano concluded, since the application is for
several discretionary permits, the Commission has several
options:
1. Approve the project and impose conditions.
2. Deny the project.
3. Continue the matter until further information
is provided.
Staff emphasized policy, and not feasibility, is needed
to dictate the form which development should take, and
declared the proposed project:
1. Does not conform with the Community Plan.
2. Is fundamentally too intense for the site.
3. Inadequately mitigates the impacts of
development.
October 8, 1990
Page 6
4. Is inappropriate for its surroundings.
5. Results in an inferior site plan.
James DeStefano recommended the Planning Commission
direct the staff to prepare a resolution of Denial,
without prejudice, and bring it back for the Commissions
final consideration.
Chair/Schey asked for clarification as to how the
density, in averaging lot size, is determined within the
Plan.
Robert Searcy, Associate Planning Director, stated the
Plan does not dictate an amount of specificity toward
application, but the staff uses a lot by lot
determination.
C/MacBride asked if the County proceeded on an average
concept, and was told, by Robert Searcy, that it did.
Chair/Schey opened the hearing to the public and asked
the applicant to make the presentation.
Frank Piermarini, developer in Diamond Bar for 17 years,
and resident for 16 years, stated the goal, for the 19
acre parcel, is to build the finest luxury homes that
average 1.18 acres, ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 sq.ft,
all individually designed, completely irrigated, and
landscaped. Mr. Piermarini perceived the property as a
liability with a potential fire hazard, slide area, and
noise and erosion problems that is to be solved on the
completion of the development. He stated the designs will
fit within the guidelines of the Country and has tried to
present to staff and the neighbors a good project.
Don King, office located at 10722 Arrow Route Ste. 616,
Rancho Cucamanga, addressed the topics of concern of the
EIR:
I
1. Grading
a. Remedial grading of 80,000 cubic yards a
safety reason to mitigate existing geological
problems.
b. Grading is to be done at once.
C. The final grading plan is adjustable to any
new City standards using CUP condition.
2. Road Grades
a. Concerning the 15% grading, the County had
granted a negative declaration in the original
development and was also approved by the
County Fire Department.
3. Gas Line
a. The gas line is to be relocated.
b. The Gas Company will approve the final
October 8, 1990 Page 7
layout, -design, and construction of the new
line.
C. The Gas Company will do the hookup and the
disconnecting.
d. The safety requirements are stingingly
enforced by the Gas Company and they assume
all liability.
4. Question of the Intermittent Blue Line Stream
a. The original review showed there was a
Possibility the development encroached on a
Blue Line Stream.
b. The actual scale and the topographic analysis
later showed the two Intermittent Blue Line
Stream were not on the subject site.
C. The applicant is waiting for a response from
the California Fish and Game, and assume no
response is a silent agreement.
5. Crib walls retaining the creation of new slopes
a. The tallest section of crib wall is 28 feet
and would move horizontally 4 feet, therefore
fitting comfortably in the 50 feet of the
highest section of the crib wall.
b. The walls are not solid and will be covered
with landscaping.
6. Proposed Landscaping
a. Replacement trees will be provided by City
standards.
b. The site is now barren, and is a fire hazard,
without visual amenity.
C. The new landscaping is proposed to cover the
entire site and the applicant will assume
responsibility in maintaining the landscaping.
d. There will be a variety of trees and tree
sizes proposed in a conceptual landscape plan.
e. The landscaping must meet the Country
standards.
7. Buffering and Privacy
a. The applicant met with the adjacent neighbors
a� a neighborhood meeting and offered to plant
trees where buffering is needed - on neighbors
property if necessary.
b. There will be trees and bushes planted to
screen and assure privacy of neighbors.
8. Viewshed and Visibility: Aesthetics
a. The applicant has provided a scale model to
fully show what the proposal will look like.
b. There is a complete photographic survey
showing the existing site from both near and
far.
9. Ridgelines
a. The photographic survey shows the current
ridgeline as barren of trees.
b A
new ridgeline would be created by the
October 8, 1990 Page 8
crowns of new trees, included in the
development. The grading and new slopes would
blend into the background because it would be
green rather than light tan as now
exists in the summer.
10. Environmental Review
a. Originally the project had been reviewed by
the County and they found no significant
impacts and granted a negative declaration.
The City is not sure of the analysis done by
the County and a Focused EIR was requested.
The Focused EIR (one of 8 units and one of 6
units) was prepared following the requirements
of the CEQA. No significant impacts on the
environment were found to occur should the
project be built as proposed.
b. The FEIR is by law only an informational
document which identifies what would likely
occur if the project were built as proposed.
By law, an FEIR cannot assume an advocacy
position.
C. The suggestion that the Commission cannot
certify the FEIR, or approve the proposed
project without making findings or overriding
concern, is leading since the Commission has
not yet determined whether a significant
impact would occur. Significant impact is
properly defined by the CEQA.
d. Certification of the EIR, merely acknowledges
the City followed the rules of CEQA in
preparation of the FEIR. It does not
acknowledge anything else. The proposed
project may still be approved or denied
whether there are environmental impacts or
not.
Don King, finished with his prepared response, continued
with answers to some of the questions raised by the staff
report. ,
1. Density and Grading
a. There is an exception on the site because the
remedial grading is not a safe set of ground,
and should be done regardless.
b. The relocation of the gas line involves
grading.
C. The statement, "With a density approving the
low-density threshold, the quantity of
required grading can be projected to decrease
accordingly.", is not supported by the data in
the EIR.
2. Roadways
a. The roads and the gradient proposed are
consistent with the County codes.
u wyC.r 0, L V V U Page 9
3. Oak Trees
a. The applicant has proposed to meet the City
standards and, as stated, there would be
additional landscaping.
b. Long term maintenance is negotiable with the
City and the applicant or as authorized by the
City.
4. Landscaping
a. The landscaping plan was submitted and had
been changed to meet the Country standards.
Don King discussed the report of the EIR:
1. In regards to the statement, " Disagreement among
experts does not make an EIR adequate.", he added,
"nor inadequate". The question of adequacy deals
with the amount of information available to make an
adequate decision.
2. The applicant had replaced supplemental and revised
pages of the EIR, instead of placing them in the
appendix of the EIR, in hopes of creating less
confusement.
3. The lots are larger then the minimum required in
the Community Plan.
4. The General Plan Policy to maintain the original
landscaping is inconsistent to the proposal because
the applicant will put in landscaping where there
is none now.
5. The remedial grading requires extensive cuts
altering the terrain and the ridgeline. The
question to be determined is: is it consistent to
the General Plan to put the soil back to its
original state, or put the soil back in a manner
allowing development.
6. The site is not a visual amenity.
7. As an alternative, 2 units are not reasonable to
build because of the amount of grading required.
Remedial grading is necessary regardless of what is
developed.
8. The DEIR would set precedent on this site and any
site that has the problems to the extent of this
site. The land is without much use other than
housing.
9. The consultant does not have the technology to do
computer graphics on houses not designed and add
them to the site for identification.
Frank Piermarini summarized his development will stop the
hazards existing on the land and will develop the land
into a beautiful site. He asked the Commission to
approve the project.
Chair/Schey adjourned the meeting for a recess at 8:45
p.m. and called the meeting to order at 8:53 p.m.
October 8, 1990 Page 10
Chair/Schey declared the Public Hearing open to the
audience in favor of the project.
John Pringle, attorney for the Diamond Bar Country
Estates Association, stated the board of directors
basically supported the development and has reached a
tentative agreement, with Mr. Piermarini, concerning the
access issues through the Country.
Dan Buffington, 2605 Indian Creek, stated as a point of
clarification referring to the General Plan, density is
to be an average.
Alan Kinder, 1800 Derringer, commended Mr. Piermarini
and approves of the development of 16 homes.
Al LaPeter, 23955 Ridgeline, felt the property is a
tremendous fire hazard and very unsightly.
Lorraine Repucci, resident of Diamond Bar, commended Mr.
Piermarini on his developments and attentiveness to his
projects.
Those in opposition to the project.
Pat Brashere, 13 year resident at 23497 Coyote Springs
Drive, felt the project will obstruct view of homes, and
will be an eyesore from the freeway. He believed the
Country was to be open and rolling, not condensed.
Tom Kraver, 1678 Bronsnell Rd., is totally opposed to the
development of the 16 units in the area and would like to
preserve the land for the existing wildlife.
Steve Campbell, 23485 E. Coyote Springs Dr., commended
Mr. Piermarinis developments but is concerned with the
nature of setting a precedent. He questioned if future
builders would do similar quality work.
Suzanne Paine, 23494 Coyote Springs, was against the crib
wall and was concerned with the environment and the
wildlife.
Claudia Huff, 1640 Fire Hallow, noted the applicant never
mentioned the alternative of leaving the land as it is.
She felt the 16 unit development is obscene and would
like the area left alone for the wildlife.
Debbie O'Donnell, 23550 Coyote Springs, stated her home
will get the run off during the rainy season and is
concerned about the safety of relocating the gas line.
Bob Huff, 1640 Fire Hallow, felt Mr. Piermarini would do
a good job of development but felt the City should
October 8, 1990 Page 11
avoid overdevelopment.
Toni Lewis, 1504 Hallow Bluff, stated if prior decisions
could be overturned within the General Plan, then it
would make guidelines difficult.
Chair/Schey asked for the Commissioners comments.
VC/Harmony was concerned with the safety of the 15%
grade.
Ron Kranzer, City Engineer, stated 15% is an acceptable
standard on hillside developments but would try to keep
it less if achievable.
VC/Harmony was concerned with the 3 lots serviced by a
driveway with substandard roads, including the road
traversing down the hill. He doubted the ability of the
Fire Department to have sufficient access to the
properties.
Don King responded the drive below the hill was intended
to reduce the grading. He stated the engineer could
eliminate the drive because those lots do have access on
the cul-de-sacs that meet the City standards.
Al Dayton, representative of Piermarini Ent., stated the
drive is necessary for access to the gas line, regardless
of the accessibility of the homes.
VC/Harmony was uncomfortable with the mass of development
occurring on very steep roads, small lots and the safety
regarding fire protection.
Al Dayton stated the plan was approved by the Fire
Department and a negative declaration was obtained from
the County. He explained the cul-de-sac street is
acceptable for accessibility because it has a turn around
for the Fire Trucks.
VC/Harmony inquired as to how tall the crib wall, on the
west edge, will be above the existing grade.
Al Dayton stated the wall is 18 feet high, however 12
feet of the crib wall will be below the grade adjacent to
the existing houses, and will not be visible.
VC/Harmony ascertained the development will create a
negative visual impact to the hillside and may not meet
SEQA requirements.
VC/Harmony asked the applicant if a plan was submitted
during the grading phase, that would mitigate any storm
runoff.
Al Dayton stated an erosion control plan would be
October 8, 1990 Page 12
developed at the same time as the final grading plan.
Ron Kranzer explained the City has strict guidelines on
erosion maintenance and the developer is responsible to
maintain any erosion control devices.
C/MacBride asked the location of the reconstitution of
the major line of unstable land.
Don King responded it would be exactly where it is now in
horizontal alignment and it would merely be a change in
vertical alignment consistent with the grading.
C/MacBride requested James DeStefanos viewpoint of the
video.
James DeStefano noted the hills are steeper than
visualized on the map, and he saw much more trees on the
site that may be affected by the grading.
Chair/Schey is concerned about the excessive grading
necessary to develop the proposed site, and felt the
overall density is too great, given the restraints on it.
He is not convinced the grading required would not be
lessen, if less homes are built on the site. He stated
the impacts, of this development, are almost entirely
going to be felt by residents outside the Country,
therefore what they allow is irrelevant to the case. He
concluded, there is too much development, in this site in
this particular circumstance.
VC/Harmony summarized the project is out of character
with the Community plan.
C/MacBride perceived Diamond Bar to want to limit
development to reflect the feeling of country living.
Chair/Schey declared the Public Hearing closed.
C/Lin suggested developing guidelines for a compromise
between the applicant and the neighbors. She had no
objections to developing the land but had reservations to
the number of lots planned.
Motion made by VC/Harmony, seconded by C/MacBride and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to prepare, for the
next available meeting, resolutions denying, without
prejudice, the Oak Tree, CUP, the Tentative Tract, and
making an appropriate finding of the EIR.
Draft Sign Chair/Schey asked for the staff report.
Ordinance:
Larry Weissman, Contract Planner, stated the purpose of
the discussion is to describe the goals, the structure
and the rationale of the draft sign program.
October 8, 1990
Page 13
1. The Goals of the Ordinance:
a. To encourage use of modest signs with due
regards for the needs of the business
community.
b. To ensure sign permit applications receive an
appropriate level of review.
C. To bring existing signs, as much as is
practical, into compliance with any
regulations which is ultimately adopted.
He stated the draft ordinance seeks to achieve these
goals through the application of design and locational
standards, in the system sign categories, which
determines the level of review required for various
signs.
The draft ordinance includes:
1. Provisions for the maximum size area and heights,
which reflect the minimum height necessary, for
effective communication of messages,including
provisions for special circumstances, which may
justify exceeding the proposed maximum.
2. Locational standards to minimize impacts in
commercial and residential areas.
3. The creation of four (4) sign groups:
a. Planned Signs - for Planning Commission Review
b. Basic Signs - for staff review
C. Exempt Signs - no permit required
d. Prohibited Signs - not permitted in any zone
4. The prohibited signs will probably be given high
priority in any sign abatement program.
Examples of changes if the draft is adopted:
1. The 12 foot pole, and pylon sign located on Colima
and Brea Canyon, and on Diamond Bar Blvd. by the
freeway, would be prohibited.
2. Wall signs would be limited to a maximum area of
100 sq.ft. for business use.
3. Temporary signs, such as Commercial Real Estate
signs, and Subdivision sale signs, would be reduced
in size.
The staff has reviewed the comments made by the
Commission, on the hearing of September 24, 1990, and the
comments on the survey. Some additions have been made to
the ordinance reflecting those comments. The draft, in
its current form, has also been mailed to approximately
60 groups for their statement. It is recommended, the
Commission direct staff to make revisions, and prepare
the draft sign ordinance for clarification, by the City
Attorney, for future recommendations to City Council.
October 8, 1990 Page 14
Chair/Schey asked the Commission for any questions to the
staff.
VC/Harmony indicated the 4 feet restriction on the
monument signs to be small and would like a compromise to
increase it. He realized the pole signs have been
prohibited but would like to know if there is a
mechanism, through the CUP, to allow for special
circumstances.
James DeStefano informed the Commission there are twc
ways to permit special circumstances:
1. Put in a revision stating any sign above "x" feet
requires a Conditional Use Permit.
2. Leave the Ordinance as drafted, and a sign above
"x" feet, needs approval of a variance.
He stated either case would have to be substantiated.
Bill Curley, City Attorney, elaborated the CUP gives more
flexibility in the applicants rationale for a special
circumstance, whereas, a variance gives the applicant a
higher standard to overcome and must have certain
discreet characteristics justifying the change. He
explained the State General Planning Law provides four
(4) discreet criteria for a variance, without exceptions,
and are reflected in the County Code.
VC/Harmony stated if the Commission does not mention the
CUP, then the variance automatically becomes adopted.
Chair/Schey summarized, if the Commission left pole signs
as a prohibited sign, then by statute, the applicant
would have the ability to ask for a variance.
VC/Harmony would like staff to elaborate on the
Commercial and Real Estate signs.
Larry Weissman explained the Construction and
Commercial Real Estate sign have been increased to an
area of 24 sq. ft. feet and the height to 6 feet, a change
from 16 sq.ft. and 4 feet in height.
C/MacBride asked if the Commercial and Real Estate signs
were one of the concerns of the Chamber of Commerce.
Staff felt the Chamber of Commerce would find the present
requirements adequate.
C/MacBride inquired as to their concerns on banners,
flags, and pennants.
Larry Weissman stated the present code prohibits banners,
flags, and pennants, including portable signs
October 8, 1990 Page 15
and balloons, whereas the survey from the Chambers
indicated the respondents would like to use them on a
temporary basis for special events.
Chair/Schey open the Public Hearing to the audience.
Jeff Nickle, with the Trammell Crow Company, at 18500 E.
Gale, City of Industry, which acquired the building at
1370 Valley Vista, in Gateway Corporate Center, from the
original developer. He would like to bring to the
Commissions attention some of the elements of the signage
program he felt can be architecturally compatible with
the Community and also serve a legitimate commercial
purpose. He urged the Commission to allow nonconforming
signs to exist at a minimum until the current tenant
leaves the City. In regards to Real Estate sign, he felt
the signs should vary in size in accordance to the size
of the project. In his opinion, a permanently mounted
sign, with lanscaping at its base, is very attractive.
In conclusion, he urged the Commission to retain the
flexibility, in the consideration of the ordinance, in
allowing non- conforming signs with special
circumstances.
Don Nardella, 22344 Coyote Springs, representing the
Chamber of Commerce, questioned if it is appropriate for
the Planning Commission to review window signs. He
questioned what a special flag is. He stated there is a
lot of desire among the business Community to see the
draft, and pointed out merchants are very concerned with
the phasing in of the plan. He would like to see
provisions for temporary lighting for holidays and other
special events. He noted, for Commercial space, the
Commission should make some consideration for the size of
the development in relationship to the size of the sign.
James DeStefano concluded the purpose of the hearing is
to acquire the various ideas and develop them into a real
ordinance.
Chair/Scheyldeclared the Public Hearing closed and asked
for the Commissioners comments.
VC/Harmony, in response to Mr. Nardella comments,
indicated there needs to be some provision directing
window signs. However, he believed the 25% allowed
presently does not give adequate consideration for
special events, or well executed window signs. He asked
staff for the definition of special flags.
Larry Weissman stated special flags indicate the
difference between the permits obtained by the Planned
Sign program and those obtained through the Exempt Signs.
Flags up to 6 feet in height, within the given
October 8, 1990 Page 16
size area, are Exempt Signs, and those above that go to
the Planned Sign category. The ordinance does allow for
any governmental flags, national flags and governmental
agency type flags within the height restrictions of the
zone area.
Chair/Schey asked staff if they need to put the draft in
a more conventional ordinance form before taking it to a
formalized Public Hearing.
James DeStefano recommended staff send a follow up letter
stating the Planning Commission has given direction to
develop the ordinance and staff is available for any
discussion about tonights meeting. Staff will then
redistribute the draft ordinance, leading up to a Public
Hearing, to further discuss its merits. He stated staff
could put the draft in a more conventional form by the
first meeting in November.
VC/Harmony preferred the Commission state the changes to
the ordinance, before staff is directed to put the
ordinance in a formal format.
The Commission directed staff to amend:
1. Monument Signs - allowed to go to a maximum height
of 6 feet, with no more than 4 feet being a sign
copy.
2. Window Signs - an additional % put on top of the
present 25% for holidays.
Chair/Schey directed staff to place the structure in an
ordinance format and bring it back to the Commission for
hearing the second meeting in November. He requested
staff, in the mean time, send the follow up letter and
subsequently distributing the draft ordinance.
NEW BUSINESS:
Interim
Development
Staff stated the Council, during the Study Workshop
Session, had
Control Ordinance
agreed the Commission go forth and develop
an ordinance. Staff has put together
Draft:
a variety of
excerpts from 9 different ordinances. The draft, before
the Commission, has many flaws, but it represents the
direction to declare policy,
establish the specifics to
be given developers, and the direction as to
the
occurrence of development on the hillside, at least for
the interim. Once the document is polished, it will
represent greatly, the direction of hillside development.
The draft has not been reviewed by Mr. Kranzer, nor by
other departments
or operations that may be effected by
it. It is staffs intent to get this to City Council
next Tuesdays meeting. by
October 8, 1990 Page 17
Bill Curley informed the Commission the Interim
Ordinance is a two (2) step process:
1. It takes effect immediately after adoption, and
will run for 45 days. During that period, staff
commences or finishes the final product and thirty
five days into it, a report must be prepared
publicly discussing where they are at in the
process. Generally the report is short. If the
final product is completed, it is adopted through
the normal process, if not, the second step is
adopted.
2. It takes it on for another 10 1/2 months. At the
end of that time, another analysis is given and is
extended it for another year.
Bill Curley stated, if in the first 45 days, the report
finds what was adopted in the Interim is unmanageable, it
can be dropped and the process begins again.
Motion made by C/MacBride and seconded by VC/Harmony and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY for support from the City Council to
adopt the Emergency Interim Ordinance, in its polished
state, and the Commissions expression for the need of
such an ordinance.
Ron Kranzer wondered how the draft applied, to the
ridgetop development, in the Country. For those asking
for a permit or a site plan now prohibited, but not
contrary to the way the Country has already been
developed, would have a Catch 22 situation.
James DeStefano stated there is a provision allowing for
existing single unit lots to proceed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: James DeStefano stated November 12, 1990 is a holiday and
November 13, 1990 is a special meeting, thereby
restricting the Planning Commissions meeting for the
Public Hearing.
C/MacBride suggested meeting November 9, 1990 at City
Hall.
James DeStefano suggested having the scheduled meeting of
November 26, 1990, and staff will have the Commissioners
packets ready by November 16, 1990 in order to
concentrate the efforts in one meeting.
Chair/Schey stated the only issue that would carry over
from the missed meeting is the cellular phone sell and
the development code will be a discussion item.
October 8, 1990
Page 18
James DeStefano concurred and included the development
code should be subdivided into discussions, whereas, one
evening would be of residential zones, and another
evening about commercial zones.
Chair/Schey stated to forgo the meeting of November 12,
1990 and meet November 26, 1990 and staff will have the
packets available by November 16, 1990.
VC/Harmony commends the Planning Director on the well
written, informative, and intelligent memorandum of the
Hillside Development.
ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by C/MacBride and seconded by VC/Harmony
and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to adjourn the meeting at 12:05
a.m.
Attest:
JJW(es DeStef
Secretary/Pl
ing Commission
David Schey
Chairman /
Al Dayton stated the plan was approved by the Fire
Department and a negative declaration was obtained from
the County. He explained the cul-de-sac street is
acceptable for accessibility because it has a turn around
for the Fire Trucks.
VC/Harmony inquired as to how tall the crib wall, on the
west edge, will be above the existing grade.
Al Dayton stated the wall is 18 feet high, however 12
feet of the crib wall will be below the grade adjacent to
the existing houses, and will not be visible.
VC/Harmony ascertained the development will create a
negative visual impact to the hillside and may not meet
SEQA requirements.
VC/Harmony asked the applicant if a plan was submitted
during the grading phase, that would mitigate any storm
runoff.
Al Dayton stated an erosion control plan would be
October 8, 1990 Page 12
developed at the same time as the final grading plan.
Ron Kranzer explained the City has strict guidelines on
erosion maintenance and the developer is responsible to
maintain any erosion control devices.
C/MacBride asked the location of the reconstitution of
the major line of unstable land.
Don King responded it would be exactly where it is now in
horizontal alignment and it would merely be a change in
vertical alignment consistent with the grading.
C/MacBride requested James DeStefanos viewpoint of the
video.
James DeStefano noted the hills are steeper than
visualized on the map, and he saw much more trees on the
site that may be affected by the grading.
Chair/Schey is concerned about the excessive grading
necessary to develop the proposed site, and felt the
overall density is too great, given the restraints on it.
He is not convinced the grading required would not be
lessen, if less homes are built on the site. He stated
the impacts, of this development, are almost entirely
going to be felt by residents outside the Country,
therefore what they allow is irrelevant to the case. He
concluded, there is too much development, in this site in
this particular circumstance.
VC/Harmony summarized the project is out of character
with the Community plan.
C/MacBride perceived Diamond Bar to want to limit
development to reflect the feeling of country living.
Chair/Schey declared the Public Hearing closed.
C/Lin suggested developing guidelines for a compromise
between they applicant and the neighbors. She had no
objections to developing the land but had reservations to
the number of lots planned.
Motion made by VC/Harmony, seconded by C/MacBride and
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY to direct staff to prepare, for the
next available meeting, resolutions denying, without
prejudice, the Oak Tree, CUP, the Tentative Tract, and
making an appropriate finding of the EIR.
Draft Sign Chair/Schey asked for the staff report.
ordinance:
Larry Weissman, Contract Planner, stated the purpose of
the discussion is to describe the goals, the structure
and the rationale of the draft sign program.
October 8, 1990 Page 13
1. The Goals of the ordinance:
a. To encourage use of modest signs with due
regards for the needs of the business
community.
b. To ensure sign permit applications receive an
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Councilmember Pap`e�n
FROM: Linda G. Magnuson; Senior Accountant
SUBJECT: Voucher Register, December 18, 1990
DATE: December 13, 1990
Attached is the Voucher Register dated December 18, 1990. As
requested, the Finance Department is submitting the voucher
register for the Finance Committee's review and approval prior to
it's entry on the Consent Calender.
The checks will be produced after any recommendations and the final
approval is received.
Please review and sign the attached.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
VOUCHER REGISTER APPROVAL
The attached listing of vouchers dated December 18, 1990 have been
audited approved and recommended for payment. Payments are hereby
allowed from the following funds in these amounts:
FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION
001
General Fund
138
LLAD #38
Fund
139
LLAD #39
Fund
141
LLAD #41
Fund
225
Grand Av.
Const Fd
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
APPROVED BY:
Linda G. Ma on
Senior Accountant
AMOUNT
265,999.07
5,616.49
8,723.85
3,427.24
57.347.83
$341,114.48
Phyllis E. Papen
Councilmember
lnitY
cf D i
i m 0 n d ca. tx*
RUN Tr IME- 16: Cu 12/ 11'5-)
`i Q U '
H E R RESISTER
�r.F+= i
0 U IF TnRU.............
17_/18i?vi
VENDOR NAME ,`ZCi 1D
z..
tt.,r �J T - Yi'. � � }.IJ � v L�irE: iFL.
,TR .,
E,ii';; JJE
T ,,,
�"�JJLLL
T'1l:,CYI
r
T
--
L��71.1{
------- -------- ------------ -----------
AMOUNT DVE -�
------ ----------- -------
1444A-`� ti ?;„• E
1= i1 1=;1
�sl
-d _
_
i�-iL'•
ti'Ci?Cijaa Jnen -L;1�
J v
iD,,L E,:ENn::T--------
u..
-L�
LAS 1J
7: al: i
it
T T
PU54'lt'_�
lCtil lli
i:���
..GC- 3'
.
T„T.� �,,LE IlEDZOIIR-
I;;i;-lam i.0 iC.i:i'Ln ________;.
Ld.:r:7!i� _.�,..a.. ....moi
!
TOTAL DR--PAT-Z,! Ai” •T ----.
i_5'"�..:
TOTAL DUE ';EN-L,OlR--------
Diamor:d Bar£
O AGE 2
VC J C H E R RESISTER
LN TIME: 16:24 12/13/90
3'CE T :RJ.............1211AI93
V -C nO IME
VENDOR, iL'.
PUNT
ACCCUCHECK
- ^^-pry try
Vi d
..nTn:. r,ry •i t 11
INEIRl0
�;1- Th'IV TEE
EN RYi% c :, c:
_ a T�C:h
u��LR iF
-
1;
.�in7 1!'_i:3i
71
64
L Jou_ ,t: iI
c Bar C `:U
,.'o{..
!rl_ysi -------
gib._..
in 4
7.
].:
T:::kL Uurc, nli;,
RUN ?'/ 4 f L i a z 0 n Q v a" �' i
- ME: 16 : L4 1, 1 `aZl�G2 1 ' 'ti �
J 0 U I, H E R R E 6? T E, n
PA o E i
DJ TiRRU.............'2^
VENDOR hair`
,�����iT i �2 ;i.'�. i - C_ BAT,...h a'L�,�1'''i'%-�'�. CJT y •'C Tl.jVlT;��: t:C ^j ^T`! -i; r :t * PREPAID
# iF
irt:L'u. LV L,.l0 Fjr,,' U� ^�
'v I` D,., E .FBF CIK
---------------- ------ ---------------------------- ------------ --- _._-_
u'E Lal i:7. nia jT_
La. _ .1CI .J
id_8i_c
1—
t*t
i r+
L,.2':'2"
,��_L u ^[1✓_'L
Hr
i _�`
au,.•
'GTA' C"E VENDOR -------
7C DUE Uci-0N --------
L't•.46
L
TOTAL D E VE'4G'!R--------.46.42
Citi ci Ciasond °ar f}
v a v v a U C H E R RE5I S T ER FAuE 4
RL,d TI,.E: 16:24 1..r13i,?
CLE THRu.............12118170
?F PREPAID } {
VENDOR PiAar adE`dDCR IC. �i
ACCO F°�C TX—'dC 'ATCri 'C.LI'MEING. ENTRYr` 'lE I?d'JCICE 1'�CR P'.iud AMOUNT_�------____Lr"--
n t;
ACCOX L
iJ�1] v=1 'J
l.,r.
uovmv In-
Iv'A te_.:emut Tisst
ICiA
.<-[1157-12; `?i
J 11 =:
t_ J_ '-},._.
1 T`yy i
Ifi. eqii '� c. iF'V J I'J i'li i8L"� _
�
1 4?1�-2ii'. 1 12 13" �+
1:
4 112 18 A
i.1218A
!L. ''t ,_ii L'_R ________
tj
-'S
1229. 73
1�+
1 TiSvc
lir
c
�n;ec
I-
c:.
'7
12/i1 .211E
u_. ..
253;
L ''_ �.
Public �z. -7p! 1r
iL i11 8
tc'2263/
i'ru:1Cs-SL� ast2
;,�9,i,L
, r:inr:,
TOTAL
2
t�* i}•,' �i alr!an
RUN TIME: 16,24 1 113fq I, ,i
7i� Bar
VOUCHER R6iSTEB
DUE THRU..............�i.Cr4} QhLp
VENDOR NAME VE:NEOR^, IB.
PREPAID
COUNT EBL3.1S— .r BAii.ri F,J. ; T,;, ljC. T,:.�B;; � r �
, �.rG .Cltl ii J� C �.�3C�ip Tip .l F f $
' i, .u�S rJLl `.T DATE
_____________________ �----
•'=TAl. L D IJVDJ`,'!--------.
_l... v..
T -i 'f L ., _ V Ni,_.. --------.
r' nt ! ❑, j,7. ,.
7a.
3
G;7
r
viIn ai
s--Yi1—V
"t'
—
'-
l21
` _3 12:_ /
.7 ('�i�Y1 t:"I '�I'_
-I .Ci'
t tJ
;7 ]J
i
�'+. YS
{ — s
r1
Jr.
"ri4ta�
._,. cc
:
TO'A GE a --------
,..
LI i :;�'.iJi+La''2^u!�r.q
ir!;,rCC
re_t=rta�-:ictaher
5
liJi hi, c'%�� .EiwvGr. ________,
n
.
Li.,uG.0
a City f Bi.aaond Bar #
U Q � G H E P, h E B I. E R
RLN TIME: 16:24 12/1?!9�) J T
DL= THRJ.............12/iV90
#PREPAID +� {
�e a 4F �DCR ID "xn
V��luvR NAME '"J AMO T DA lr.
r„
. I ..: u.: K : i 1J� I'iVu.
AGCnin;T PRD:;.TR vG BATCH Pf` 1�r'!'?.------------
--------------------------------------------------
Lard.art
`i ilcl�d
5212
i�:Ii=�:atJ
L _____—__
r,.
,07 i.t��•, ',''
FdJi pl'CW
� 4{.
J
41
_Ss)—
ar.,c.
-:� 1. -a u• —
zra
.tea . -♦ .._—_
-..
'. r, _.
ML
Park_,a
17
dt
n
TGTAL DUE 4'E;DuR --------.
12`n`.:5;1
}�+ City of iar }±s
RUN TIME: 16;'L 12113/9n V G U C H E R DP, am and b
E 6 I 5 T E R
DUE TH$U............. 12118190 PACE )
VENDOR NAME VENDCR IC
❑ x � PREPPID
i'�T PiiU TX_NG BAT � [i .. r d ' T F r!' Tia `T"_ r__,:
C. .:� r t , D, uvu ,�'_UMT DA. E 1 P
' 1:.
J -uv .t. lay. T'
CPECK
gid:_' L:.i 31
CK. La-uscau.e Mari r,.3 f'Le u.._3r'7
iGLJ_
ra _fly . 35,. C3G:" 3r r7_
a. LJi.
rayl'Cii .
.dal Vii} J31'�_•
E
__
_2_
LU
- ]f1r
I':%il"r�5
°.31/oi'_ Trans 1i •': ;'i
31,51'j.a;+ 1E1E:',
TOTAL PREPAID AMn1UNT ---
----
P.T5,D— LQOR----_--_l,- -
P.
D i a,nnnd
Bar #*f
•'�
FA E
FA
!A� '�[, 16'.24 !vj
Ru' T! IE: 11MI 9:
n
iJ 't{4t R R E O
i r t R
DUE T;'RJ.............12
1419v
VENDOR MOVE
VENDOR I
n o�7n�
"+`;100:'�i
r,T Ch F^
�_r.
nn + rig-. r, i:r
A-- -- ?--- ----
BATC! ,� Tu NO,
----- --- ---- -
ENT- 'V'r''- ^ice
---- ---- I !----E
'E Lh T!;j'T
---------------------------'-----------------
_
a.-_4
ir
4 t5
nu
7 171
_tac Ln . f _
31-4 9
9 q
_
. 7._.
RI Cn_.
i
1c,
Lv.
111_.
had:
- LI
it SAL ya'E 'r EIN,
RUNTIME: 15:Z41t/13,9.)
�#�
C itp Ilf Di
a�aod 5
;%OUCHPR
RESI57ER
DUF T33J.............1?i1b/9
PhEE 9
VENDOR ;?HrE
VENDCR iE.
ACC LINT
PROI.C. T X-` O BATCH NE,' =; '
_--
r -
E;'J p!uU I+4uiC`
# � PREPAID g f
__________________,-_-__-____-__
--
uEEC iP?iu?!
'
_______________________________________________..___
ffNUJN'T DAT _
E
_
Re_cue R�et?r
Res.�_Ec�t
1
Fin
?„rr., D'U
Ear ESC^:==
r'T:t' P1: 4E D
:I,hhL ,.�'JE y. .r".i ---------
{'14 Iii
+;t f uia�d ?..sr *�+
R PA
C
iVt0yUCcRER RaEa5I5TEGE
iv
RUN TI "E: 1�:D4 l /i? +i1Jr
-DUE THRU............. 1� ?r.
* + PREPAID
tEi'fDt're NAMEC1DoR r ��T�
ACCOUNT PYA. °'G BHT�9 ?J.'LiiiE;NC. E,'iTRYi'J�t 'aNGE.............,P'i+J'1 --r----------` -�r,
Dr"PH G''ti
N CCJL, ..-----------
a a
cal. _
qrap
srr i „•` is i
r;LC I.r LI.V
.{ .
'
sur rr.y L'L •
BUUILhOrfi Le. 'disc^ 4.27
t,j Ln
li" .c1t 1$!il i'.+10 t_u Y--
TOT PL D'= VENTHR.------- 4ii,?'
}{ Cicy of Biamo;d Bar
RU's TIME. 15:24lz2,!l3t4t± Vt?UCHER REuISTER
➢UE TNRU[..81?�
.............1''± P€5E 11
VEND.R NNE L"%R 13,
A fl, LOUvT FR] .TI -`,Q RJEN P" l ENTRY/nil Hva1!t r. PREPAI3
.,r. LKi"'•" - T DATE-
-
+ll 1 h. num r:14:.:,R ________ y
•�.� .� .
Bau.eer Ea. Edise;;
+138-4533-3135
3 11E1'8F
Eiec-Dist ..38
r+9 ,14
'1 T,. r' -------
'
•
IGI'A i'uG it Eh Oc,R --------
s4,K
1�.
-------
lai0ul Val et' R°_;:^23t
Cf,' V:.. _.''.?c
1435+"-�3i
i lie _
l
i..i 12 1
E..
:.__r-iiii-";ir'Ldl�ia'.
J�
1,67 rf
n
TOTAL DLL lIiIonp-----------L'j
+'
eft
Ci v ai Camond
���slsT�a
p;: #x#
Fanp 12)
v�LIcNF>?
RUFF TM:
iu�U,
ULA ....
,,,,,i2i'fEj°'3
Oryry iF �'p..nATD E it
' A �
�:
I
�l L +u,
';rl
n
TIon
nt��yr
MOUNT , DA vl. cF.
Y „n ;arrH uU LIN-iNU
INT tnnl.
----------------------'-----------
�iiT(`(ru1
--------------
,,,.y�,�� trI•; 'M1la��� ,__�
-•
- �
els_ 3: :I'=:=.
� �.,,
{i�=_ItLJv-217 �iii73`
•_�__ -... :J
_
s6"
x,,:�. •a -q^
7_'-. pr :a3J1c U-�_
'�
14,
1
j:r y
LIN TIME
12/1;1 =)
lit V i'
1 3 :3 Q it d 5 d T f t
�=7
�0J�NED
�iE6i5
TE
F! i V D 5 U- i
H R', f
0
R�PRi
;;
P a 7 c t
0 U E THM .............12118/9
i
11
L
7 ,.RI
r
r
. L
aL 1
V' F15 P� L
Cil G^ �t rT+, '4
` TR Si r1�`l',.
__�_�___
f.'J 4c.
---------------------
_________________________________________________
Y
-- LL iD
y
i�
--------
------------
.
ALL FUNI
ILL L
------------
------------ ------------ -----------
2`6._v, , ,-,