Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/05/1990
Next Resolution No. 57 Next Ordinance No. 6 JUNE 5, 1990 DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL 6:00 P.M. THANK YOU FOR NOT SMOKING, DRINKING OR EATING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Werner ROLL CALL: Councilmen Papen and Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Forbing and Mayor Werner. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Councilmembers are for Council discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. SCHEDULE FUTURE MEETINGS A. Traffic and Transportation Committee - June 7, 1990 - 6:00 p.m. - Library. B. Planning Commission - June 11, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. - W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. C. Joint Meeting City Council/Planning Commission -June 12, 1990 - 6:00 p.m. - W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. D. Park and Recreation Study Session - June 14, 1990 - 6:30 p.m. - City Hall. E. Council Strategic Planning Workshop - June 14 and 15, 1990 - 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on the 15th - Newport Beach. F. General Plan Advisory Committee - June 21, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. - Ramada Inn. G. Planning Commission - June 25, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. - W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. H. Joint Meeting City Council/Traffic & Transportation Committee - June 26, 1990 - 6:00 p.m. - W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Ave. I. L.A. County Sheriff's Dept. 2nd Joint Quarterly Breakfast - June 28, 1990 - 7:00 to 8:30 a.m. - Diamond Bar Country Club. JUNE 5, 1990 PAGE 2 J. Parks and Recreation Commission - June 28, 1990 - 6;30 p.m. - Community Room, 1061 S. Grand Ave. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 15, 1990 and Adjourned Regular meeting of May 22, 1990. 3. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve Warrant Register dated June 5, 1990 in the amount of $740,712.32. 4. TREASURER'S REPORT - Approve Treasurer's Report for the month of April, 1990 5. DENIAL OF CLAIM - Claim for Damages filed by The Anden Group. Recommended Action: Deny Claim. 6. RESOLUTION 90 -XX - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING THE POSITION AND SALARY RANGE FOR PARRS MAINTENANCE WORKER II. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90 -XX establishing the position and salary range for Parks Maintenance Worker II. 7. GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for services provided by the County. The only change for the current year is Business License set- up administration. All other services for continuation with the County of L.A. have been included and monies have been provided for in the 1990-91 fiscal budget. Recommended Action: Approve the Agreement and authorize Mayor to execute. 8. REDUCTION OF SECURITY DEPOSIT - Requested by County of Los Angeles for reduction of security deposit of $238,125 for Storm Drain/Drainage Improvements, Private Drain No. 1697, Tract No. 38454, as well as reduction of $119,026.50 for Labor and Material. Recommended Action: Reduce Security Deposit for Storm Drain/Drainage Improvements, Private Drain No. 1697, Tract No. 38454 in the amount of $238,125, as well as $119,026.50 for Labor and Material and instruct City Clerk to send a copy of Council action of this recommendation to the principal and the Director of L.A. County Public Works. 9. ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER - Requested by County of Los Angeles to approve the work and accept for public use the Sanitary Sewer under Private Contract No. 10739 offered for dedication by Fred Kahane. JUNE 5, 1990 PAGE 3 Recommended Action: Approve the work and accept for public use the Sanitary Sewer under Private Contract No. 10739. 10. PURCHASE OF TRUCKS - Council previously authorized purchase of two (2) vehicles for use by the Parks and Maintenance Department and Code Enforcement. Staff prepared bid documents and distributed the packets to nine local truck dealerships. Bids were returned by one vendor. Recommended Action: Award bid to Glendora Dodge, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $26,839.40 for two trucks to be used by Parks and Maintenance and Code Enforcement. 11. LANDSCAPE AGREEMENTS - Maintenance of City Parks and Maintenance Districts 38, 39 and 41 is being performed by private landscape contractors. The agreements with the contractors expire June 30, 1990. The agreements contain a clause for a two-year contract extension at the City's option. It is staff's opinion that a two-year extension wold not be in the best interest of the City. Therefore, staff is recommending a one-year extension of services with the intention of preparing a bid package for landscape contract services for Fiscal Year 1991-92 during the coming year. Recommended Action: Authorize staff to enter into agreements with Landscape West and OK Landscape for a one-year contract extension. 12. POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY AGREEMENT RENEWAL - At their Public Hearing on May 15, 1990, the City Council received an oral presentation from the Humane Society to continue animal control services for the City commencing July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. The Executive Director of the Humane Society stated the maximum expense to the City would be $10,000 and could be decreased by revenue generated in the City. Recommended Action: Approve the agreement with the Pomona Valley Humane Society to provide animal control services for the 1990-91 Fiscal Year. 13. SIGNAL AWARD - Four bids for traffic signal installation at Grand Avenue and Summitridge and Longview and Grand Avenue were received and opened on May 24, 1990. Recommended Action: Award bid Hovey Electric, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $136,042. JUNE 5, 1990 PAGE 4 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - Proclamations, certificates, etc. 14. NATIONAL SCHOOL RECOGNITION - Presentation of plaque to Neil Armstrong School on being named a "National Distinguished School." Plaque to be presented to Eugene Domeno, Principal of Neil Armstrong School. 15. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to Suzanne Budovec of GTE. 16. PROCLAMATION - Proclaiming the Month of June, 1990 as "FIRST AID KIT & BOOK MONTH" in conjunction with the State of California's "Earthquake Preparedness Month Campaign." 17. DIAMOND BAR ZIP CODE - Postmaster Morton, Pomona Sub- station has been requested to speak in a public forum. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matters can be heard. 18. ZONE CHANGE 90-0028 - Continued from May 15, 1990. Change of Zone designation from R-1-6000 (Single Family Residence, High Density) to C -1 -DP (Restricted Business Zone with Development Program) on a 1.65 acre site located on the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. Recommended Action: Receive public testimony and direct staff as necessary. Adopt Ordinance No. XX(1990). 19. (a) ZONE CHANGE 90-0036 - Zone Change from M -1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing - Development Program - Billboard Exclusion) to C1 -DP -BE (Restricted Commercial- Development Program - Billboard Exclusion) , with a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for one 49,915 sq. ft. 3 story hotel (145 rooms) one 5,000 sq. ft. family restaurant (200 seats), one 2,800 sq. ft. fast food restaurant (70) seats, one single story, 15,000 sq. ft. retail shop building and one 6,000 sq. ft. retail shop building on 7.54 acres. Environmental Determination: NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (b) Appeal filed by Councilwoman Papen of Conditional Use Permit 89-440 regarding signs. Recommended Action: Receive public testimony and direct staff. 20. ORDINANCE NO. OX: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING THE USE OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND BY ANY VEHICLE EXCEEDING A MAXIMUM GROSS WEIGHT OF TEN THOUSAND POUNDS. EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, JUNE 5, 1990 PAGE 5 ESTABLISHING PENALTIES THEREFOR AND REPEALING CHAPTER 15.48 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED. Recommended Action: Receive public testimony, approve for 1st reading by title only and direct staff. 21. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC PROJECTS FOR FY 90-91 - Consideration of proposed FY 1990-91 Capital Improvement Projects with the proposed General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar. Recommended Action: Receive public testimony. 22. ORDINANCE 20A-(1989)- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 20 (1989) ESTABLISHING A PURCHASING SYSTEM — This Ordinance would establish preference to local merchants. Recommended Action: only. OLD BUSINESS: Approve for first reading by title 23. SIGN ORDINANCE MODIFICATIONS Recommended Action: Council discussion and consensus with direction to staff and City Attorney. 24. ANNUAL AGREEMENTS - L.A. County is currently providing services to the City under one-year Agreements for Examination of Tract Maps and Parcel Maps, Industrial Waste, and Maintenance of Traffic Signal and Highway Safety Lighting. These agreements were approved on May 1, 1990 with requested amendments to indicate that either the County or the City may terminate any of these agreements. L.A. County has advised that these amendments are unacceptable. Recommended Action: Approve agreements as drafted and cause same to be executed as required. ANNOUNCEMENTS - This time is set aside for any City Councilmember to direct staff regarding any matters to be discussed at a future meeting. CLOSED SESSION - Personnel - Government Code Section 54957.6 Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9 ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAY 15, 1990 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: COUNCIL COMMENTS: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California. The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by MPT/Forbing. Councilmembers Papen, Kim and Horcher, Mayor Pro Tem Forbing and Mayor Werner. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski and City Clerk Lynda Burgess. C/Papen congratulated Neil Armstrong Elementary School on being recognized as a "National Distinguished School." M/Werner and the Council presented a souvenir gavel to C/Papen in honor of her leadership as the City's first Mayor. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Peter Gramporcaro, 22719 E. Lakeway Dr. #397, President of the Diamond Bar Tennis Club Community Assn. advised that all parking lots in the complex would be slurry sealed in the next few months. Due to the need for cars to be out of the area during that time, he requested the City's help in locating an area for temporary parking. M/Werner referred the matter to CM/Van Nort. Red Calkins, 240 Eagle Nest Dr., advised that he had attended an inspection tour of Waste Management Industries;,however, he still wants the freedom of choice and does not want the City to grant an exclusive franchise to any one waste hauler. CONSENT CALENDAR: MPT/Forbing moved, seconded by C/Kim to approve the Consent Calendar with the exclusion of Item 10. Items No. 4 and 5, Resolution Nos. 90-50 and 90-51 are amended to exclude the words "and lighting." Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN - Papen, Kim, Horcher, MPT/Forbing and M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEN - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN - None Schedule Future A. Parks and Recreation Study Session - May 24, Meetings 1990 - 6:30 p.m. - City Hall B. Planning Commission Meeting - May 24, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. - W.V.U.S.D. Board Room, 880 S. Lemon Avenue MAY 15, 1990 PAGE 2 C. General Plan Advisory Committee - May 17, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. - Ramada Inn. D. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 2nd Joint Quarterly Breakfast - June 28, 1990 - 7:00 a.m.-8:30 a.m. - Diamond Bar Country Club. Approval of Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 1, Minutes 1990. Warrant Register Approved Warrant Register dated May 15, 1990 in the amount of $170,903.82. Resolution 90-50 Adopted Resolution No. 90-50 entitled: A Landscaping Assessment RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Districts 38, 39 & 41 DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GENERALLY DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. 38, 39 AND 41 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 AND DIRECTING ENGINEER'S PREPARATION AND FILING OF REPORT THEREON. Resolution 90-51 Adopted Resolution No. 90-51 entitled: A Intention to Levy & RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Collect Assessments - DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DECLARING Landscape Districts ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS 38, 39 & 41 FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE WITHIN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. 38, 39 AND 41 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS HEREON. Resolution 90-52 Adopted Resolution No. 90-52 entitled: A Re Possible Closure RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF of Long Beach Naval DIAMOND BAR RELATING TO POSSIBLE CLOSURE OF Shipyard THE LONG BEACH NAVAL SHIPYARD. Claim for Damages Denied claim for damages filed April 30, 1990 by Mr. Frank Dursa. Resolution 90-53 Adopted Resolution No. 90-53 entitled: A Granting Consent & RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Jurisdiction to OF DIAMOND BAR GRANTING CONSENT AND L.A. County Re JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN County Lighting THE MATTER OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE District 10006, DISTRICT 10006 AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT Project 207-98 LLA -1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ZONE PROJECT 207-98. MAY 15, 1990 PAGE 3 Resolution 90-54 Adopted Resolution No. 90-54 entitled: A Granting Consent & RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Jurisdiction to OF DIAMOND BAR GRANTING CONSENT AND L.A. County Re JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN County Lighting THE MATTER OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE District 10006, DISTRICT 10006 AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT Project 223-86 LLA -1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ZONE PROJECT 223-86. 1990-91 Para- Approved expanded services for Fiscal Year transit Contract 1990-91 and authorized execution of a contract with L.A. County at an estimated cost of $33,600 to be funded by Proposition A. Study Session Authorized a Study Session at 5:30 p.m. on May 22, 1990 for discussion of business permits and Redevelopment Agency feasibility. Annual Agreements Following discussion, C/Kim moved, C/Papen w/L.A. County for seconded to approve the annual agreements with Examination of amendments allowing for termination by either the Tract & Parcel County or the City. With consensus of Council, Maps; Industrial the motion carried. Waste; & Maint. of Traffic Signal & Highway Safety Lighting PRESENTATIONS: Southern Calif. M/Werner introduced Mr. Oscar Abarca and Mr. Assn. of Gov'ts. Gil Smith representing SCAG. Mr. Smith, Director (SCAG) of Government and Public Affairs, gave a brief presentation regarding membership. Dues for one year is approximately $4,450.00 depending on the population of the City. Certificates of M/Werner presented Certificates of Recognition Recognition - to Sheila Laksana, Golden Springs Elementary; Spelling Bee Charlie Hee, Maple Hill Elementary; and Lauren Winners Buchan, Castlerock Elementary for winning first, second and third places, respectively, at the 15th Annual Junior Women's Club Spelling Bee. Ms. Pat Borchard, representing the Junior Women's Club, presented M/Werner with a Certificate of Appreciation for his participation in the Spelling Bee. Proclamation M/Werner proclaimed May 9, 1990 as "Day of "Day of the the Teacher" and presented both the Walnut Valley Teacher" and Pomona Unified School Districts with Proclamations. MAY 15, 1990 PAGE 4 Proclamation M/Werner proclaimed May 23, 1990 as "Classified "Classified Employee's Day" in the Walnut Employees Day" Valley and Pomona Unified School Districts. Proclamation M/Werner proclaimed the week of June 4 week "Management Week" through June 8 as "Management Week" in the June 4 - 8, 1990 City of Diamond Bar. OLD BUSINESS: Bus Shelter Award Mr. Tony Ingegneri, Bustop Shelters of California, advised that the City would be provided with 20 advertising shelters, 35 non -advertising benches and 4 non -advertising shelters for public service announcements. Following discussion C/Horcher moved, seconded by C/Papen to award the franchise to Bustop Shelters of California with amendments regarding preference to local businesses, recyclable materials, and $76.10 or 19.1% revenue to the City, whichever is greater. With following Roll Call vote, the motion was approved: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Horcher, MPT/Forbing and M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None 1990-91 Strategic CM/Van Nort stated that the Strategic .Planning Workshop Planning Workshop would be held on June 14 and 15, 1990 with the location to be announced at a later date. GPAC Appointments Following discussion, C/Papen moved, seconded by MPT/Forbing to reduce the total membership of the General Plan Advisory Committee to 28. With consensus of Council, the motion was approved. C/Kim then nominated Shally Hsu to the General Plan Advisory Committee. Diamond Bar Blvd. Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel Median Landscaping gave a status report on the Diamond Bar Blvd. median landscaping currently in progress. Resignation of C/Papen announced that Council had received Robert Kane, a letter of resignation from Mr. Robert Kane, Planning Commission member of the Planning Commission, due to an employment promotion. MAY 15, 1990 NEW BUSINESS: PAGE 5 Council accepted Mr. Kane's resignation with regret. C/Papen nominated Mr. Planning Commission, consensus of Council, approved. Dexter MacBride to the C/Kim seconded and with the appointment was Chamber of CM/Van Nort presented a proposed agreement with Commerce the Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 1990 - Agreement 91. This agreement would enhance the sales tax FY 1990-91 revenue for the City as well as support the Council's desire to assist in improving the stability of businesses within the City. The agreement would include payment to the Chamber in the amount of $8,000. Mr. Don Nardella, representing the Chamber, advised that the Chamber is looking forward to working with the City and that the funds would help the them to promote businesses in the City. C/Papen requested the City Manager to look into a policy regarding the Chamber's use of the City Logo since it has been registered as a trademark. Following discussion, C/Papen moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to approve the Agreement between the City and the Chamber of Commerce with the removal of the termination clause, specifically Paragraph C. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion carried: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Horcher, MPT/Forbing and M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None Agreement with CM/Van Nort presented a proposed agreement with Community Community Industries - Lanterman Development Industries - Center to utilize the services of developmentally Lanterman disabled persons in maintaining tree wells on Development Diamond Bar Blvd. The cost of the program would Center be $6,092. Following discussion, C/Papen moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to approve the service agreement with Community Industries - Lanterman Development Center in the amount of $6,092. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion was approved: MAY 15, 1990 PAGE 6 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen, Kim, Horcher, MPT/Forbing, and M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None RECESS: M/Werner recessed the Meeting at 8:00 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Werner reconvened the Meeting at 8:10 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Zone Change 90-0028 Following a brief overview of the requested zone change by Mr. Robert Searcy of the Planning Department, M/Werner declared the Public Hearing open. Mr. Jan Dabney, 671 Brea Canyon Rd., repre- senting G. Miller Development, favorably commented on the project. Mrs. Barbara Thurlo, Cold Spring Lane, asked if there would be any protection of the old trees on the property. Mr. Fusato, 210 Lycoming, Walnut, asked who owns the property above the flood channel, and if the City has the authority to rent it out. Jackie Zurate, 848 Dryander Dr., Walnut, inquired into plans for mitigation of the traffic. M/Werner asked Mr. Dabney to address the issues that had been raised by the citizens who spoke. Mr. Dabney advised that the Flood Control District can lease the area over the channel for parking, etc. His firm had sent a letter to Mr. Fusato addressing his concerns. The Flood Control District had recommended this action, since the idea of leasing the area above the channel was a consideration for additional parking. Regarding the trees on the property, Mr. Dabney advised that they would do everything possible to save, within reason, the existing trees by moving them and incorporating them into the landscape plan. Following discussion, Mr. Dabney agreed to continue the Public Hearing to June 5, 1990. MAY 12, 1990 PAGE 7 C/Kim moved, C/Papen seconded to continue the Public Hearing to June 5, 1990. With a voice vote of 4 Ayes and 1 No (MPT/Forbing), the motion carried. Budget FY 1990-91 CM/Van Nort presented the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 1990-91. Mr. Bill Harford of the Pomona Valley Humane Society advised that based on the services provided for the year 1989-90, the total cost to service the City for 1990-91 would be $93,000. Costs directly borne by the City for 1990-91 would be $10,000. Parks and Maintenance Director Charles Janiel gave a presentation regarding the budget for Parks and Maintenance for fiscal year 1990-91. C/Papen requested that $5,000 be included in the budget for next year's City Anniversary celebration. M/Werner opened the Public Hearing. In response to an inquiry by Dr. Dan Buffington, 2605 Indian Creek, CM/Van Nort advised that the bottom lines were that the City would be expanding services without increasing fees and would still maintain approximately $600,000 in reserves. With no further testimony being taken, M/Werner declared the Public Hearing closed. C/Kim moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to approve the 1990-91 Budget in concept. With consensus of Council, the motion was approved. Business Permits M/Werner declared the Public Hearing open and declared the Hearing continued to Tuesday, May 22, 1990 at 5:30 p.m. in the W.V.U.S.D. Board Room. M/Werner advised that consideration of the proposed Resolution in support of State Constitutional Amendment 1 would be continued to the May 22, 1990 meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Papen suggested that members of the public look at the number of lighted signs currently posted on Colima Ave. to become aware of the way Diamond Bar would look in a few years if sign controls were not put in place. She further requested staff to research the possibility of approving development projects with conditions as to construction of signs based on later adoption of a sign ordinance. MAY 15, 1990 PAGE 8 This would be in lieu of a moratorium on all development until a sign ordinance is adopted. C/Papen also advised that there was a large amount of trash along the fence on Grand Avenue by the Golf Course. C/Kim requested staff to: (1) prepare a Resolution strongly requesting Caltrans to complete the landscaping east of the 57 and 60 freeways; (2) prepare a Resolution requesting Southern California Edison to continue placing utilities underground on Diamond Bar Blvd.; (3) conduct meetings regarding hospital construction; (4) complete plans for City Entrance signs no later than the end of May; and (5) preparation of a map color -coding all open space in the City that may be used for parklands. CLOSED SESSION: There being no further business, M/Werner recessed the meeting to Closed Session for discussion of Litigation and Personnel Matters at 10:04 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: M/Werner reconvened Regular Session at 10:14 p.m., declared that there was no reportable action taken and adjourned the meeting at 10:14 p.m. to Tuesday, May 22, 1990 at 5:30 p.m. in the W.V.U.S.D. Board Room. ATTEST: Mayor Respectfully Submitted Lynda Burgess, City Clerk CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1990 CALL TO ORDER: M/Werner called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. in the Council Chambers, W.V.U.S.D., 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance ALLEGIANCE: by C/Kim. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Papen and Kim, Mayor Pro Tem Forbing, Mayor Werner. C/Horcher arrived at 5:35 p.m. Also present were City Manager Robert L. Van Nort, City Attorney Andrew V. Arczynski and City Clerk Lynda Burgess. COUNCIL COMMENTS: MPT/Forbing advised that Council had attended the Contract Cities Conference in Palm Springs this past weekend during which valuable information was obtained by all in attendance. M/Werner advised that both he and CM/Van Nort had attended the L.A. County Transportation Committee Meeting on May 22, 1990 to discuss regional transportation issues. He further stated that the Commission prepared a Regional Transit Commuter Plan that includes projected rail lines, which for the most part bypass the East San Gabriel Valley. He would like to see Council take action on this matter in the near future. CONSENT CALENDAR: To the Schedule of Future Meetings, M/Werner added a meeting to be held on May 23, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at the Walnut Sheriff's Station regarding Earthquake Disaster Preparedness. The meeting will be chaired by Mr. Charles Majus. C/Papen moved, MPT/Forbing seconded and with consensus of Council, the Consent Calendar was approved. PRESENTATIONS: Planning Mr. Dexter MacBride was administered the Oath of Commission Office by M/Werner as a new member of the Planning Commission. He replaces Robert Kane, who recently resigned due to employment conflicts. PUBLIC HEARING: Business Permits Continued from May 1, 1990. CA/Arczynski presented a report regarding the drafting of a Business Permit Ordinance. M/Werner opened the Public Hearing. MAY 22, 1990 PAGE 2 With no testimony being taken, M/Werner closed the Public Hearing. Following discussion, M/Werner reopened the Public Hearing. C/Horcher moved, MPT/Forbing seconded to continue the Public Hearing to June 19, 1990 to afford the opportunity for public testi- mony. With consensus of Council, the motion was approved. C/Papen requested that a fee schedule be included for review by June 19, 1990. NEW BUSINESS: Home Occupation City Attorney Arczynski presented a report Permits regarding the drafting of a Home Occupation Permit Ordinance. Following discussion, staff was requested to incorporate the following into the Ordinance: (1) a home occupation would supplant the need for a business permit; (2) neighbors of residence in question not required to be noticed in advance of a permit to be issued; and, (3) a provision for conditions to be placed on the permit for approval. Resolution No. 90-55 CM/Van Nort presented Resolution No. 90-55 for approval. Mr. Van Nort advised that this resolution was brought to Council by the League of California Cities, asking that the cities take a position on SCAT which supports Propositions 108 and 111. Following discussion, MPT/Forbing moved, C/Kim seconded to amend Resolution No. 90-55 to replace 11SCA111, where applicable to read "Propositions 111 and 108". Motion carried by a voice vote of 3 Ayes, with M/Werner voting No and C/Horcher abstaining. Resolution 90-56 City Engineer Kranzer presented plans and Approval of Plans specifications for median and traffic signal for Median & Traffic improvements at Diamond Bar Blvd and Grand Signal Improvements Ave. and requested authorization to advertise Diamond Bar Blvd. for bids. He advised that bid opening would & Grand Ave. be set for June 14. MAY 22, 1990 PAGE 3 Following discussion, MPT/Forbing moved, C/Horcher seconded to adopt Resolution No. 90 - 56 with a direction that staff research including additional landscaping for the 50' strip in front of the Fire Station on Grand Ave. as a change order. With consensus of Council, the motion carried. Redevelopment A.J. Wilson made a presentation regarding the Feasibility eligibility of the City as a redevelopment project area. He advised that after speaking with persons of the business community as well as the school districts, he had arrived at five basic findings that could indicate a level of eligibility for redevelopment activities: (1) inadequate public facilities relating to transportation; (2) inadequate public facilities relating to water services; (3) inadequate public facilities relating to public education to serve the existing housing population; (4) inadequate facilities for the elderly; and (5) social and economic malad- justment (ability of citizens to pay for services is not commensurate with the cost of housing). C/Horcher left the meeting at 7:18 p.m. Diamond Bar residents Gary Neely, Don Nardella, and Marc Henry commented on the presentation. Following discussion, with consensus of Council, the matter was continued to the June 19, 1990 meeting to give Council time to make comments to Mr. Wilson for completion of Phase 1 of the contract. City Manager MPT/Forbing presented this item to the Council Agreement and advised that the Personnel Committee recommended approval of the new "Employment Agreement" as submitted. CM/Van Nort advised that changes in the agreement include termination and severance pay on Page 2, which was increased from 4 months to 8 months; Item No. 4 was changed in 2 parts: (1) increase from $6700.00 to $7400.00 per month in salary and 2) deletion of a provision regarding automatic cost of living adjustments. Deferred compensation in the amount of $400.00 per month was added and vacation was increased to 20 days annually. Mr. Al Rumpilla, 23958 Golden Springs, spoke in favor of the new agreement. MPT/Forbing moved, M/Werner seconded approval of the Employment Agreement. With the following Roll Call vote, the motion carried: MAY 22, 1990 PAGE 4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Kim, MPT/Forbing and M/Werner NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Papen ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - Horcher ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Kim requested that staff contact Caltrans regarding sound walls and landscaping on the eastern sections of the 57 and 60 freeways. MPT/Forbing requested that staff invite a representative from Caltrans to a future Council meeting to explain their funding process, how federal funds have been utilized over the last 20 years, when the program is over, and when the State can start putting money back into State highways. M/Werner reiterated the need for sound walls on the freeways. CLOSED SESSION: There being no further business, M/Werner recessed the meeting to Closed Session for discussion of Litigation and Personnel Matters at 8:05 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: M/Werner reconvened Regular Session at 8:15 p.m., declared that there was no reportable action taken and adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor Respectfully Submitted, Lynda Burgess, City Clerk CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant SUBJECT: Warrant Register, June 5, 1990 DATE: May 31, 1990 Attached is the Warrant Register dated June 5, 1990. The warrants will be released on June 7, 1990. Please direct any questions concerning the Warrant Register to the Finance Department by 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 1990. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR WARRANT APPROVAL The attached listing of warrants dated June 5, 1990 is hereby allowed from the various funds in the following amounts: FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 001 General Fund 121 Park Grant Fund 138 LLAD #38 Fund 139 LLAD #39 Fund 141 LLAD #41 Fund 225 Grand Av. Const Fd 226 Chino Hills Pkwy Const Fd TOTAL ALL FUNDS APPROVED BY: Linda G. Mag i on Senior Accountant Robert L. Van Nort City Manager f\u[�Ii1�pY 599,028.27 46,855.45 63,842.42 7,610.92 1,438.11 19,419.65 2,517.50 $740,712.32 Phyllis E. Papen Councilwoman Paul V. Horcher Councilman AGENDA NO. 1�- ----------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 30, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Linda G. Magnuson, Senior Accountant Submitted for Council's review and approval is the Treasurer's Statement for the month of April, 1990. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of bank account balances, and investment account balances. At the end of April, there were checks issued but not released. These funds continued to be invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund until the actual release of the checks, therefore the Treasurer's statement shows a negative balance in the General Account. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED, BY: --------------------- --------- Robert -----Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREASURERS MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT **rr*********rw,r***r**ra*w•w*r*,r* April 30, 1990 SUMMARY OF CASH: ---------------- DEMAND DEPOSITS: INVESTMENT: GENERAL ACCOUNT ($468,405.79) PAYROLL ACCOUNT 16.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00 --------------- TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS ($467,889.79) TIME CERTIFICATES $0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00 L.A.I.F. 7,013,000.00 --------------- TOTAL INVESTMENTS 7,013,000.00 --------------- TOTAL CASH $6,545,110.21 BEGINNING TRANSFERS ENDING FUND ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS IN (OUT) BALANCE GENERAL FUND $4,215,082.24 $694,158.96 $594,578.05 $4,314,663.15 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 45,956.59 27,084.87 73,041.46 GAS TAX FUND 917,939.99 100,592.74 1,018,532.73 LOCAL TRANSIT TAX FUND 97,739.77 116,136.12 2,688.68 211,187.21 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FD 1,654.47 1,654.47 FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND 0.00 0.00 STATE PARK GRANT FUND (156,885.63) 15,020.00 (171,905.63) LTG & LNDSC DIST #38 FD 232,785.53 72,281.58 6,944.35 298,122.76 LTG & LNDSC DIST #39 FD 223,790.58 35,760.36 15,694.46 243,856.48 LTG & LNDSC DIST #41 FD 46,934.73 40,946.58 7,277.90 80,603.41 SELF INSURANCE FUND 125,000.00 125,000.00 GRAND AV CONST FUND 100,000.00 2,059.91 3,553.50 98,506.41 CHINO HILLS CONST FUND 255,750.71 6,103.18 10,006.13 251,847.76 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $6,105,748.98 $1,095,124.30 5655,763.07 $0.00 $6,545,110.21 SUMMARY OF CASH: ---------------- DEMAND DEPOSITS: INVESTMENT: GENERAL ACCOUNT ($468,405.79) PAYROLL ACCOUNT 16.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNT 500.00 --------------- TOTAL DEMAND DEPOSITS ($467,889.79) TIME CERTIFICATES $0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER 0.00 L.A.I.F. 7,013,000.00 --------------- TOTAL INVESTMENTS 7,013,000.00 --------------- TOTAL CASH $6,545,110.21 AGENDA NO. 6- ----------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 30, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager vim, �Ii FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney The Anden Group has filed a claim for indemnity as a result of being served with a Complaint in the Lim wrongful death lawsuit. The claim, as noted, is a request for the City to indemnify their firm to the extent of any liability with may be imposed on the Anden Group. It has been, and continues to be, the City's position that the City is not liable for the injuries and damages incurred as a result of the accident in question and it is recommended that the claim be denied. It is anticipated that further claims for indemnity will be filed with the City as other defendants in the Lim litigation are served with the Complaint. AVA/lb (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: r__ V/ ---------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant RECEIVED DIAMOND BAiR CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RESERVE AFI P Claims for death or for injury to person or personal property or growing 1' ` `' � l Y 24 k!M 11: 53 crops must be filed within 6 months�Of the occurrence which caused the injury. All other claims must be filed within one year. See Government Code 911.2. Read the entire claim before filing. Attach copies of estimates, bills, re- ceipts, and all other documents in support of the claim. Attach separate sheets for diagrams and additional information, if needed. SIGN EACH SHEET. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA NAME OF CLAIMANT DATE OF BIRTH OCCUPATION The Anden Group ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT 1074 Park View Drive, Suite 201 HOMEPHONE WORK PHONE P.O.Box 3329, Covina, CA 91722 (818) 339-5254 ,'.",AILING ADDRESS TO WHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT NAME OF CONTACT CONTACT PHONE Parker, Stanbury, Babcock, Cambs & Bergsten ; Douglass H. Mori ( 213) 622-5124 611 West 6th Street, 33rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 DATE, TIME & PLACE OF OCCURRENCE August 16, 1989 at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boule- vard and Gold Rush _Drive in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Tos Angeles DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE Please see attached. (A) NAMES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES WHO CAUSED INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS the City,of Diamond Bar; City Council EXPLANATION OFWHYPUBLIC ENTITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS Please see attached. (B) NAMES, ADDRESSES & PHONE NUMBERS OF WITNESSES & DOCTORS Dr. Rodolfo Perez Brea Community Hospital Brea Community Hospital Brea, California Brea, California DESCRIPTION OF!NJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS The alleged wrongful death, medical malpractice, property damage, and personal injury of Jennifer Lim for which liability is imposed on the Anden Group entitles the Anden Group for implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, and declaratory relief from the City'of Diamond Bar, the stuns of which are undecided at this stage of the lawsuit, and will not be resolved until the time of trial. ITEMIZED AMOUNT OF CLAIM (ESTIMATED IF UNKNOWN) This sum is unknown at the moment, as the plaintiffs have failed to specify the amount of daViages they seek to recover. 5/22/90 DOUGLASS H. MORI SIGNATURE OF CLAI ANT O REPRESENTATIVE DATE TYPED OR PHIN I f: L) NAMC CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED WARNING: Presentation of a false claim is a criminal offense, and filed with the Clerk of the Public Entity. punishable by fine and imprisonment. See Penal Code 72. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES/CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA A. On 8/16/89 Larry Wayne Chitwood and Jennifer Lim were involved in an automobile collision, resulting in the death of Ms. Lim. It is alleged that the power and responsibility to regulate and control the traffic signals at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Gold Rush Drive resided with the City of Diamond Bar, and that on 8/16/89 the City had failed to provide adequate traffic control signs at that intersection, after allowing significant development of new homes in the neighboring hills which exited from Gold Rush Drive onto Diamond Bar Boulevard. It is alleged that the high speed of traffic on Diamond Bar Boulevard, in combination with a large volume of traffic on Diamond Bar exiting from Gold Rush Drive, in addition to the failure to implement proper traffic controls, contributed to the proximate cause of Ms. Jennifer Lim's wrongful death. B. The City of Diamond Bar failed to provide adequate traffic control signals at the intersection of Gold Rush Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard, despite having approved the development of several homes around the area, and the existence of heavy, high-speed traffic along Diamond Bar Boulevard. The failure to adequately control traffic at this intersection contributed to the wrongful death of the plaintiff, Jennifer Lim. By crg\103-015269.fm\16jb AGENDA NO. -------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 18 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Charles Janiel, Director of Parks and Maintenance May 15, 1990, the Council authorized the creation of a Parks Maintenance Worker II position. Staff has developed a salary range, position description, and Resolution to establish the position. The salary range developed reflects the duties and skills required. Very little of the duties will be grounds keeping, but more of a facility maintenance nature. RECOMMENDATION• Adopt Resolution establishing the position and salary range of Park Maintenance Worker II. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested Budgeted Amount In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) $ 31,000 Wages and Benefits RE ---------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski City Manager City Attorney Linda Magn son Sr. Accountant ----------- AGENDA NO. ---------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT ---------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------- DATE: May 21, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: General Services Agreement The City, during the past year, has operated under a general service agreement with the County of Los Angeles. The request for services is based on the needs of the City. The primary service is the public works contract. It is recommen- ded that the City Council adopt the attached agreement and forward to the County of Los Angeles. The only change for the current year is Business License set-up administration. All other services for continuation with the County of Los An- geles have been included, and monies have been provided for in the 1990 - 1991 fiscal budget. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: Robert L. Van Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney AR300.FRM 3/90 1 Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT May 24, 1990 AGENDA DATE: JUNE 5, 1990 TO: CITY COUNCIL VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY ENGINEER` SUBJECT: SECURITY REDUCTION REQUEST FOR PRIVATE DRAIN 1697, TRACT 38454 (WERBEL HOMES) The subject improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as inspected by Los Angeles County Public Works Department and confirmed by our office. The remaining security, 25% of the original amount is retained to guarantee the project through transfer to Los Angeles County for maintenance. This procedure could take as long as one year. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the subject Letter of Credit No. 1687, the security deposit for storm drain improvements for Tract 38454, be reduced to 25% ($119,026.50) pending transfer to Los Angeles County for maintenance. RLK:nb:2249:cc-db:bondrel\tr38454.rd2 (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Dudgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REV ED BY: < / ---`--------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant TR .# 38454 Ip U. rK aH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' Cq 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE L IFOFN\P ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director Telephone: (818) 458-5100 May 3, 1990 The City Council City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 330 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Council Members: STORM DRAIN/DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT'S PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1697 TRACT NO. 38454 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE L-5 REFER TO FILE: The construction of the drainage facilities guaranteed by the improvement... security listed below, and constructed under the subject Private Drain, has been completed in compliance with the plans and specifications. IT IS RECCtS ENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: Reduce the following security deposit by $238,125 Faithful Performance and $119,026.50 Labor and Material: Letter of Credit Number 1687 Original Amount - $317,500 Faithful Performance $158,750 Labor and Material Financial Institution - American Savings and Loan Association 343 East Main Street, Suite 409 Stockton, California 95201 Depositor - Roger C. Werbel, Inc. 1255 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 101 Monterey Park, California 91754 Please instruct the City Clerk to send a copy of the City Council action on this recommendation to the surety, principal and this office. This letter supersedes our letter date April 6, 1990. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Luke Guggenheim of this Department at (818) 458-4953. Very truly yours, -D-e ' ���- o T . A. TI DEMAIITSON Director of Public Works LG:sg/38454B cc: City Clerk C I T Y O F D I A M O N D B A R M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ron Kranzer, City Engineer FROM: Robert L. Van Nort SUBJECT: Letter of Credit Number 1687 DATE: May 22, 1990 It is requested that you review the County records and forward with your position to the City Council at the June 5, 1990 Council Meeting. Robert L. Van Nort City Manager RLVN:ch Enclosure / cc: City Clerk✓ OF LOS ,NC sl �� COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS x C'4LIF0RM�PX 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director Telephone: (818) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 May 3, 1990 IN REPLY PLEASE L-5 REFER TO FILE: The City Council City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 330 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Council Members: STORM DRAIN/DRAINAGE IMPROVEW= PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 1697 TRACT NO. 38454 The construction of the drainage facilities guaranteed by the improvement security listed below, and constructed under the subject Private Drain, has been completed in compliance with the plans and specifications. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: Reduce the following security deposit by $238,125 Faithful Performance and $119,026.50 Labor and Material: Letter of Credit Number 1687 Original Amount - $317,500 Faithful Performance $158,750 Labor and Material Financial Institution - American Savings and Loan Association 343 East gain Street, Suite 409 Stockton, California 95201 Depositor - Roger C. Werbel, Inc. 1255 Corporate Center Drive, Sl.?"- 101 Monterey Park, California 91754 Please instruct the City Clerk to send a copy of the City Council action on this recommendation to the surety, principal and this office. This letter supersedes our letter date April 6, 1990. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Luke Guggenheim of this Department at (818) 458-4953. Very truly yours, ��- -40" T. A. TIDEMANSON Director of Public Works LG:sg/38454B cc: City Clerk FILE torr CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 24, 1990 TO: Ron Kranzer, City Engineer FROM: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer - Private Contract No. 10739 Attached is a request from the County of Los Angeles for acceptance of a sanitary sewer offered for dedication by Fred Kahane. This has been scheduled for the June 5, 1990 City Council agenda and is transmitted to you for preparation of a staff report. We will need your report by 5:00 on Tuesday, May 29th. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Let me know if I can be of assistance. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT May 24, 1990 AGENDA DATE: JUNE 5, 1990 TO: CITY COUNCIL VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER, FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY ENGINE '- SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWERS - PRIVATE CONTRACT NO. 10739 (E) The subject sanitary sewer facilities have been completed per approved plans and inspected by the County of Los Angeles. This office has reviewed the findings of L.A. County and in agreement with their recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the offer of dedication of said sanitary sewer for public use and instruct the City Clerk to send a copy of the City Council action to T.A. Tidemanson, Director of L.A. Public Works. RLK:nb:2250:cc-db: pc10739.sew (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Dudgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: Rel l , WED ZBY: _r�----------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant ?1y oF. LOS ,HC F x - x C4L/FORH�p THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director May 4, 1990 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 The City Council City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Council Members: ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE. L-2 ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer project constructed under Private Contract No. 10739 has been completed in compliance with the plans and specifications and in a manner satis- factory to the Director of Public Works. The construction of said sewer is not deemed complete until the work is approved and accepted as complete by the City Council, and said sewer is not deemed public property until the Offer of Dedication attached hereto is formally - accepted by the City Council. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: Approve the work and accept for public use the sanitary sewer offered for dedication by Fred Kahane as indicated on the attached map. After the sewer becomes public property by your formal acceptance, proper maintenance can be provided and the City Engineer can issue permits for additional connections and extensions of the mainline sewer for the use of the other residents of the City. Please return a copy of this letter to this office showing the action taken by your Council. Very truly yours, T. A. IDEMANSON Director of Public Works SI:gp/city3 Attachments cc: City Clerk City Engineer �+ OF LOS ,N OJ? II>�� cf` :li' I, * x x Cq(IFOR0 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director May 4, 1990 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L-2 The City Council City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive Suite 100 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Council Members: ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer project constructed under Private Contract No. 10739 has been completed in compliance with the plans and specifications and in a manner satis- factory to the Director of Public Works. The construction of said sewer is not deemed complete until the work is approved and accepted as complete by the City Council, and said sewer is not deemed public property until the Offer of Dedication attached hereto is formally accepted by the City Council. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: Approve the work and accept for public use the sanitary sewer offered for dedication by Fred Kahane as indicated on the attached map. After the sewer becomes public property by your formal acceptance, proper maintenance can be provided and the City Engineer can issue permits for additional connections and extensions of the mainline sewer for the use of the other residents of the City. Please return a copy of this letter to this office showing the action taken by your Council. Very truly yours, T. A. IDEMANSON Director of Public Works SI:gp/city3 Attachments cc: City Clerk City Engineer � r r '+.•.7c:�» ,,r?:.w- -r•. +: 1t C:ti`i� i•. ?'� 'ka`'1' vn •� ,� �,�.� 1 _.�_, �'7��(^!1�j�iY'�r,�a:t�'.1+`+1l`�r.(t.dt•1'^?+:,.4�•r:,p�`Rtrs.'1� �;:'.�1'••��'` 3�.�-��1:f��•�.�'���'�-i%(.`}:i�.'.�.'.�.--'•C � ��. �c st. a.�'S'e �� r.Gy;iri. .rr� [+rr-�" •a ♦' wTn4�r;`twX , ,�,1•.:'e-� � F�:.Tt''•.rJr�:r N: M X'..fi,'��.:��iw} ti w�. S .5:�-..:�.�,, �..� � �,]' r �r 1. •irk y.•!�; �7rPak'-} `ia �^� � 1 �;4 f• �' �:L �•t,.1 .,♦}':`�'���!r,. ./r ai..GL, .�•ii?" � •q r tt i }:.. 2� �"f':Y �L4.t� .�.r b. .♦ i� Y+ri1Q t� r.3-r`�r..,%Y.--r�}r-�:L�- r i.'1 � ' :.-�r T•7--x•-s'•.�r-•*,--r.-,-'---r—^^`*'2^•-`''>_.-c.; _ -•1—r T -r _ .0 1 t ., _,,� -r ---- a T 1 . nr„•�t.Y-. .C�/7�iy �F -t r i..-^ ).?'tC' ri. nLif `.♦-a t. •r. c .r' .r. � +- y.+v,`•a'l'•'y�1���r1 <f '�� ,':1K_41' t'rz (-*-rY:,..i v'' s� •.+ t:-1 � � `k r.t• - .• r vl tv .c i 't" r �♦`j'3':$. Ste: ICts1 Tif Via. � 1i� di?..a' `n T.. f L.. :i -c r 5�� � ti t 1 r.. Zf� � .t � . �'-�!�~•1 li. ;{ �yp -� „nj,rr.,�k ..•� _ /_r Y 1✓fi C ^6 � . 3 1.. �• � ` �� Ti it.^ < l•f;�c �+ , ltfrf.� �, i�Jf ✓ t. J. I;. 7 r n t( \ � �(� rf _ ji�:� �•: • rr •�+�f�+^.r�•� t r ..+ tJ.� � � ; « r'T• � .: •t � r - rl •.. Y � � r _ ' t{J•.t:, -t`•' �.{ i14 - M .:r`� ley •1 C �/1 t + 1 r / Y. jp •ate •:.<. .t .y • _ - ti�G=moo ' - ai BOJ. SATE. �41 Al . .. •� ��EX.61E5� . ",. 09 'a ai LO � Q. /NDEX M•� P 1"' OF H16HLWD VILI-FY RD. All�67 3 q rwoM' 9¢: A5 • �f; ::.- ••' tr � �;• _ r�,� � t .. SCALE - � . . 1•� G'�.:.i�l...{.r.,�r:`r ��y(, r. Ty,-, ,r4 t� ?t �,.�' r r , ,.: AP Rp✓ED: • �!• - � t. a � +r6 t � is be t k �,ft f. t r. -: •r. �a[j r �.: fT }:J;r _.•*r��? t fld r 'r - TL.�ir �1 r. t. !♦r.: �¢ ti, � ... ...- -. I' r''" V DISAS A. TioE�tNSO.V ` T t . , _ ,.: f _f i t L . •' r f r C���' N . ' ��±N%.�C . Yvvy�.�.J r.:f �r lei �fT''f 1 , r y 1 ♦ Ilr.1 V}�C 1 •� .h ��•:-�'•t -. •.,t' :'`S i\ ` yr .; �.:.�'.:rtlL+ tir +•✓, f ,e'$T � '1-.( f.. f �, (`^ 'wt.: .l j♦-f� ' �: 1. e ! f y�• :`:t.... `ter S.' rlt.,� _�� Z ►y i C 'SAr f. c J. '�S Ij,- t.,, -ts(. L i" l �• r,,. F='. 'r1 � •�, :�'i _�� + mat `iy :: _::•:�.i� �• t � 7 ..Ir. � •.� �)r 1'y� Sl. �. ,� 1 ty t�i,..{clfst �yh � Ati f1 f �'� r.cC � � ./ - ��'.''•-. !}� ��, L��Ki(.t� rl�r.>>• ,� S,/Fj.r .fir 2 .r S Yli` � ♦ t. 4 •C riF)n'r1 e, 1 I„ rri } a BJ :: _ •..i... •' _ . �� �ttj, ^[ yy K•tti. «;h.a. r i ..ii r 1..r �-f��♦ -AC 1.._ •1•.�1•J� fit. L•�R+ � •g .t ... ._�. _L,r:,y'ii'4ifF': .�FY f.� Y ..i t�•�}:.':i �='T,�,t++ ( 1r•',:�4,,;;c ���;.,.. _ �'j.1.' 'e.r�:y:: 'I'.•ri. sir,'• L -r{ tl�.f:�lyt'F.'X':.ryt;ft,r; �rf?_`.�t-%�.' tr.�r..{...•�r; .�•s•�,1;..�C;l;'•.1 -b �; _ .._ _ ., __ .+' �.N`.T •.�'. .3- I�r tt.'.-w e+ -_ •c'.• -Y:'� •�].':�: c.:._.:;.. Vi:'�;P.�d .:�•�•�:r :w�c "' •n• -ss. .� ,,�'j }„f:��yS•� tiLii tt`,�y'•�•'�:i'�+-i11*`.S�'�ir.♦'L .t .i,xrat4i..;}�c•L�•.�Ir�. t•�F'; •v{Yr'.!:: '•�. ;;. �... :.:. 11^i. .f Ti 'r:'�-t i••Fv�.4'F:: .. .I..•,.V = ��C C� �•.+'�'C}�"-J.r t+r ✓.. •:l. �-;..?,.n r: �.t;f.•,...• y�f •y••• _•�/.r-' •��� - :'1y:• ••1•��`��.�:i. .�:� .i: - 'ii�.l•:r'. ;orf "y> '�♦-.Y':n-s', 1 Y T. ':•i�'c � `'►'r,. ''.•G<�'��Sl sera-'.•-- r•F'=•r;•:t�/r(J.{���.+.::t;�°--r'�rn'<:T'�� f_. �I�Lx.•t K,. -• - ?�t•nr•'.l:'�-{ti�`���`�1 .Fi,! .<t;� d7%+� .y r,'��ry',.� .FQL. "Y��:lS•'..r �•: i.f •;..i#•y-:rt 'fe�.:.1r r ��.Y ;r i is+!p. t,. w 1� •' f_•i � •• 1 L•.t ( ,,,�♦_'Y �, r �. 1• t+c�:1. '{ 3t✓ �L. •.=,1.2`. 2•s•t•i:s C'j�. .�:.f:'. .., :. _��r•:-_ r^��:t�'.r"h.-.a7r.;-s.:a;" �'f�X'��-r.. ? �✓S'i�n.+-.��':•.:Cr>~..?.i'+?r�.r �:'.�� I,'v_��i.'• ��_ �'�••�' 1r •ib:"=�;a.�;'=;••t, 5'!'r.'���___ Corporate Fund for Housing A Regional Non-profit Development Corporation 6029 Bristol Parkway, Suite 200, Culver City, CA 90230 (213) 216-9333 PC -6 Rev.1-80 Board of Directors William F. McKenna Pmtrser Emeritus, McKenna, Conner and Caned OFFER OF DEDICATION VICE CHAIRMAN John Tunney Choi— Cloverleaf Group Honorable Board of Supervisors ]illieneBalker County of Los Angeles Can.,dtoo California Tom Bradley Mayor, City of Los Angeles We hereby declare that the sanitary sewers and appur e- nant structures constructed under Private Contract No. Betty TomChr107-39 in accordance with the plans filed in the Office Chairperson and CEO, Tm.tSa gsBmtk of the Department of Public Works are built for public Kathleen M. Connell use and that upon their acceptance by the County of Los Pre.tde.t, Angeles, all right, title, and interest of the Cannell and Associat.s undersigned in and to said sewers shall vest in said Deane Dana County. Supe n. County of [As Angeles Norman Dreyfuss Chairman, Marq... i M.diaal Products Ira D. Handelman red Kahane, President President. Handelman and Katherman, [oc. Dr. Maurice Mann Chou— and CEO, Pacific stock Eshange, Inc. (Corporate Seal) Robert Nathan Developer, Turpin Whitsbook Mark Pisano Esecvtive D— 1., Southern Calif— As—anon of Government. Brenda Y. Shockley Esecuiive Director Dsesv Economic D.velopment Corp Roger R. Stanton Super. OrangesCoanty Raymond A. Watt Chnvman, Wan Indvsme., Inc Subscribed and acknowledged to before me ,this _ L2 Y-- day of Mme� , 1990. Not Public in a'hd for the County of Los Angeles, State of California. NOTE: All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public. (.Attach appropriate acknowledgements.) OFFICIAL SEAL MICHELLE S BELSON NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES 00CM My ISI uL expires DCT 13, 1990 NOTE: All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public. (.Attach appropriate acknowledgements.) --------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 18, 1990 MEETING DATE. June 5 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Charles Janiel, Director of Parks and Maintenance BACKGROUND: Council has previously authorized the purchase of two (2) vehicles for use by the Parks and Maintenance Department and Code Enforcement. Staff prepared bid documents and distributed the packets to nine (9) local truck dealerships. Bids were returned by one (1) vendor. Bidding closed at 11:00 a.m. on May 31, 1990. Attached find specification schedules, notice inviting bids, bid sheet and letters to nine (9) local dealerships inviting sealed bids. RECOMMENDATION: Award bid to Glendora Dodge the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $26.839.40. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: $ $26,839.40 Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: General Fund REVI BY: - ---�!------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant BID SHEET YEAR: 1990 OR 1991 SPECIFY YEAR Iggo 1 each @ $ DOCUMENTARY FEES _ waived SALES TAX h 7�, % 911.85 rebate 1,000 TOTAL DELIVERED PRICE $1Tn 19Tx79 The following must be signed by an authorized agent of your firm. Your bid will not be accepted unless this section is complete. I, the undersigned, having read and fully understood all terms, conditions and specifications herein, agree to adhere to the same unless otherwise noted in the "EXCEPTIONS TO -SPECIFICATIONS" section of this package. SIGNED: Glen 1Lra D0 qe Firm's Legal Name PRINTED NAME: J. Chris Zubiate 121 P Alosta Av. Firm's Address FIRM'S PHONE NUMBER: 818 115-026_1 DATE SIGNED: 5/30/90 DELIVERED IN: seven DAYS AFTER AWARD BIDDER GUARANTEES PRICE UNTIL: subject to availability Date PAYMENT TERMS OFFERED: 30 day with purchase order schedule two vehicle BID SHEET YEAR: 1990 OR 1991 SPECIFY YEAR 1990 1 each @ $ 13,508.85 DOCUMENTARY FEES wa i ved SALES TAX 6.75 % $ 911.85 rebate 1,000 TOTAL DELIVERED PRICE $ 13,419.70 The following must be signed by an authorized agent of your firm. Your bid will not be accepted unless this section is complete. I, the undersigned, having read and fully understood all terms, conditions and specifications herein, agree to adhere to the same unless otherwise noted in the "EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS" section of this package. SIGNED: _Glenda Firm's Lega-1 Name PRINTED NAME: �J,Chris Zubiate 121 E. Alosta Av. Firm's Address FIRM'S PHONE NUMBER: 818 335-0261 DATE SIGNED: 5/30/90 DELIVERED IN: DAYS AFTER AWARD BIDDER GUARANTEES PRICE UNTIL: subject to avai l ahi 1 i ty Date PAYMENT TERMS OFFERED: 30 day with purchase order SCHEDULE I Page 1 SPECIFICATIONS, GENERAL The intent of this specification is to describe a mid-sized, high- mileaged Ford Ranger pickup truck or equivalent with 1/2 -ton capacity. This vehicle will be used in residential and business areas of the City, primarily on paved streets, for performing various service functions, at low to intermediate speeds. SPECIFIED BODY DIMENSIONS 1990 FORD RANGER SUPER CAB Overall Length: 193.6" Wheel Base: 124" Overall Width: 66.8" Standard Bed Length: 72" *EXTENDED CAB ONLY* ENGINE V-6 Cylinder, 2.9 liter, fuel injected TRANSMISSION Automatic with a minimum of 3 speeds forward, one reverse, one neutral, and park -lock. Auto Overdrive. BRAKES Front -powered disc -type. Rear -self adjusting drum -type. All brakes to be power, not manual. SUSPENSION Coil Springs, front Axle type, rear Capacity: Front - 2060 lbs. each Rear - 2550 lbs. each To be equipped with heavy duty rear springs. Load Carrying Capacity - 1300 lbs. min. OFFERED O.L.: O.W.. Liters: i A] Front: lbs. Rear•. lbs. L.C.C.. lbs. SCHEDULE I Page 2 SPECIFIED OFFERED COOLING SYSTEM Heaviest duty (Super) cooling system designed to accommodate this class of vehicle, that manufacturer will allow, with factory installed coolant recovery system. *Super Cooling Option STEERING Power -Assisted. FUEL TANK CAPACITY Approximately 17 gallons. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM The supplier furnish a HEAVY DUTY 12 volt electrical system specifically designed to handle the load requirements of this class of vehicle, equipped with options, as specified herein. Battery shall be a heavy duty minimum 535 cold cranking amps, maintenance -free type. Alternator shall be 60 amp. minimum. TIRES AND WHEELS Tires shall be tubeless steel belted radial ply. Tire size shall be P195/70R14. Vehicle shall have 5 tires and rims, all the same size. The spare tire shall be full size. BODY, BED The body shall be Styleside. The standard length bed shall include a bedlirer. AIR CONDITIONING The vehicle shall be equipped with factory installed air conditioning. SCHEDULE I Page 3 SPECIFIED OFFERED BUMPERS The front and rear bumper shall be factory installed. Rear bumper shall be step -type. INTERIOR (UPHOLSTERY) COLOR The interior color shall be blue. Vinyl bucket seats. EXTERIOR COLOR The exterior color shall be the manufacturer's standard production solid white paint, including entire body and rims. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1. AM/FM Radio, factory installed. 2. Heavy duty rubber floor mats. 3. Tinted windshield. 4. Dual two -speed electric windshield wipers. 5. Cigarette lighter and ashtray. 6. Multi -speed heater. 7. Windshield defogger system. 8. Left and right arm rests. 9. Dual sun visors. 10. Dome Light. 11. Inside rear view mirror. 12. Two (2) dual outside rear fire mirrors, (left and right sides of vehicle approximately 911x 6 1/211. The right outside mirror shall be equivalent in design and appearance to the left mirror. Any exposed holed from any previous mirror must be filled smooth and finish painted. Use of screws to plug such holes will not be acceptable. 13. Dual windshield washers. SCHEDULE I Page 4 SPECIFIED OFFERED 14. Standard tool kit including wheel changing tools and jack adequate to safety lift the vehicle when loaded to rated capacity. 15. An electronic back-up alarm shall be provided on this vehicle. 16. Glove compartment with door. 17. Seat belts - two (2) sets of seat belts installed. 18. -California Emission Requirements. 19. Beacon Light - Code 3 Model 6105 mini light wired to battery, mounted on roof center wired to switch mounted to left of steering column, fuse protected wiring. *(no substitution)* PRE -DELIVERY SERVICE All vehicles must be completely serviced, inspected, properly adjusted and road tested before delivery, including the proper fill of all fluids, lubricants, and gasoline. WARRANTY The standard manufacturer's sample applicable warranty shall be enclosed with bid, and shall apply to all vehicles purchased under this specification. The starting date of the warranty shall be the date the vehicle is actually placed in service and not the delivery date. MANUALS A service manual shall be supplied at the time of delivery, together with any other printed matter or literature a person using the vehicle might need to properly operate and maintain the vehicle. Operator's manual shall be placed in the glove compartment of each vehicle when delivered. The City also requests that SCHEDULE I Page 5 SPECIFIED OFFERED Manuals contd. they be placed on the manufacturer's mailing list for service bulletins on the units purchased, if not already on the list. REGISTRATION AND DELIVERY In keeping with the City policy, decals, insignias and license frames for advertising purposes shall not be installed on any unit. Vendor shall furnish proper "Record of Sales" forms with the necessary smog and weight certificates if required. All vehicles shall be delivered to Diamond Bar City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California 91765, (714)860-2489. SCHEDULE 2 Page 1 SPECIFICATIONS, GENERAL V The intent of this specification is to describe a mid-sized, high- mileaged Ford Ranger pickup truck or equivalent with 1/2 -ton capacity. This vehicle will be used in residential and business areas of the City, primarily on paved streets, for performing various service functions, at low to intermediate speeds. SPECIFIED OFFERED BODY DIMENSIONS 1990 FORD RANGER SUPER CAB Overall Length: 193.6" O.L.: " Wheel Base: 124" W.B.: " Overall Width: 66.8" O.W.: " Standard Bed Length: 72" *EXTENDED CAB ONLY* ENGINE V-6 Cylinder, 2.9 liter, fuel injected Liters: it TRANSMISSION Automatic with a minimum of 3 speeds forward, one reverse, one neutral, and park -lock. Auto Overdrive. BRAKES Front -powered disc -type. Rear -self adjusting drum -type. All brakes to be power, not manual. SUSPENSION Coil Springs, front Axle type, rear Capacity: Front - 2060 lbs. each Front: lbs. Rear - 2550 lbs. each Rear: lbs. To be equipped with heavy duty rear springs. Load Carrying Capacity - 1300 lbs. min. L.C.C.: lbs. SCHEDULE 2 Page 2 SPECIFIED OFFERED COOLING SYSTEM Heaviest duty (super) cooling system designed to accommodate this class of vehicle, that manufacturer will allow, with factory installed coolant recovery system. *Super Cooling Option STEERING Power Assisted. FUEL TANK CAPACITY Approximately 17 gallons. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM The supplier furnish a HEAVY DUTY 12 volt electrical system specifically designed to handle the load requirements of this class of vehicle, equipped with options, as specified herein. Battery shall be a heavy duty minimum 535 cold cranking amps, maintenance -free type. Alternator shall be 60 amp. minimum. TIRES AND WHEELS Tires shall be tubeless steel belted radial ply. Tire size shall be P195/70R14. Vehicle shall have 5 tires and rims, all the same size. The spare tire shall be full size. BODY, BED The body shall be Styleside. The standard length bed shall include a bedliner. AIR CONDITIONING The vehicle shall be equipped with factory installed air conditioning. SCHEDULE 2 Page 3 SPECIFIED OFFERED BUMPERS The front and rear bumper shall be factory installed. Rear bumper shall be step -type. INTERIOR (UPHOLSTERY) COLOR The interior color shall be blue. Fabric bucket seats. EXTERIOR COLOR The exterior color shall be the manufacturer's standard production solid white paint, including entire body and rims. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1. AM/FM Radio, factory installed. 2. Heavy duty rubber floor mats. 3. Tinted windshield. 4. Dual two -speed electric windshield wipers, intermittent wipers. 5. Cigarette lighter and ashtray. 6. Multi -speed heater. 7. Windshield defogger system. 8. Left and right arm rests. 9. Dual sun visors. 10. Dome Light. 11. Inside rear view mirror. 12. Two (2) dual outside rear fire mirrors, (left and right sides of vehicle approximately 911x 6 1/211. The right outside mirror shall be equivalent in design and appearance to the left mirror. Any exposed holed from any previous mirror must be filled smooth and finish painted. Use of screws to plug such holes will not be acceptable. 13. Dual windshield washers. SCHEDULE 2 Page 4 SPECIFIED OFFERED 14. Standard tool kit including wheel changing tools and jack adequate to safety lift the vehicle when loaded to rated capacity. 15. Interior courtesy light group. 16. Glove compartment with door. 17. Seat belts - two (2) sets of seat belts installed. 18. California Emission Requirements. PRE -DELIVERY SERVICE All vehicles must be completely serviced, inspected, properly adjusted and road tested before delivery, including the proper fill of all fluids, lubricants, and gasoline. WARRANTY The standard manufacturer's sample applicable warranty shall be enclosed with bid, and shall apply to all vehicles purchased under this specification. The starting date of the warranty shall be the date the vehicle is actually placed in service and not the delivery date. MANUALS A service manual shall be supplied at the time of delivery, together with any other printed matter or literature a person using the vehicle might need to properly operate and maintain the vehicle. Operator's manual shall be placed in the glove compartment of each vehicle when delivered. The City also requests that SCHEDULE 2 Page 5 SPECIFIED OFFERED Manuals contd. they be placed on the manufacturer's mailing list for service bulletins on the units purchased, if not already on the list. REGISTRATION AND DELIVERY In keeping with the City policy, decals, insignias and license frames for advertising purposes shall not be installed on any unit. Vendor shall furnish proper "Record of Sales" forms with the necessary smog and weight certificates if required. All vehicles shall be delivered to Diamond Bar City Hall, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California 91765, (714)860-2489. City of Diamond Bar Notice Inviting Sealed Bids Sealed bids will be received by the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California for two (2) 1990 City vehicles. The proposal, specifications and additional instructions to bidders are attached. Sealed proposals, marked City vehicles shall be delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, on or before May 31, 1990 at 11:00 a.m.. Bids received after the specified time and date shall be returned to the bidder unopened. All bids shall be opened and read by the City Clerk at Diamond Bar City -Hall on May 31, 1990 at 11:00 a.m.. The City Clerk shall report the results of the bidding to the City Council with recommendations as to the award, at which time the City Council may award the contract to the lowest bidder. Questions regarding the plans, specifications or any other portion of the contract shall be directed in writing to Lynda Burgess, City Clerk, 21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Dated: May 10, 1990 Signed: BID SHEET YEAR: 1990 OR 1991 SPECIFY YEAR 1 each @ $ DOCUMENTARY FEES SALES TAX % $ TOTAL DELIVERED PRICE $ The following must be signed by an authorized agent of your firm. Your bid will not be accepted unless this section is complete. I, the undersigned, having read and fully understood all terms, conditions and specifications herein, agree to adhere to the same unless otherwise noted in the "EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS" section of this package. SIGNED: Firm's Legal Name PRINTED NAME: Firm's Address FIRM'S PHONE NUMBER: DATE SIGNED: DELIVERED IN: DAYS AFTER AWARD BIDDER GUARANTEES PRICE UNTIL: Date PAYMENT `PERMS OFFERED: GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY Or DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. HIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. HIM ' ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RF.CYCLF.D PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. HIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FORBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER GARY H. WERNER JOHN A. FOBBING PHYLLIS E. PAPEN PAUL V. HORCHER JAY C. KIM ROBERT L. VAN NORT Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER lambi N8 I/ CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 DATE: May 18, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Charles Janiel, Director of Parks and Maintenance BACKGROUND: Maintenance of City Parks and Maintenance Districts 38, 39, and 41 is being performed by private landscape contractors. The agreements with the contractors expire ents contain a clause for a two re June 30, 1990. The agreem year contract extension at the City's option. It is staff opinion that the City's interest would be better served by a shorter extension of services. Therefore, staff is recommending a 1 year extension of services, with the intention of preparing a bid package for landscape contract services for the fiscal year 1991-1992 during the coming year, working with the Council Landscape Committee and Park and Recreation Commission. The present levels of service are adequate, and staff has developed a working relationship with the contractors. Both contractors have expended time and effort to address areas of concern as expressed by Council, Commission, citizens and staff. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Landscape West and OK Landscape price aInd Indexyear increase contract as extension. is due to by agreement betweenCity Consumer and Co contractors. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Community Prks + 418.80 = 8,794.85 per month Budgeted Amount $ LLMD #38 + 148.35 = 3,115.35 per month In Account Number: LLMD #39 + 273.75 = 5,748.75 per month Deficit: $ LLMD #41 + 165.00 = 3,465.00 per month Revenue Source: General Fund and LLMD Fund EE RE -'-ED- Y� - ---------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van -ort-/ Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant City Manager City Attorney CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDMENT TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This amendment to landscape maintenance agreement is made and entered into as of this day of , 1990, by and between the City of Diamond Bar, a Municipal Corporation ("City" hereinafter) and ("Contractor" hereinafter). A. Recitals. (i) City and Contractor have previously entered into that certain Landscape Maintenance Agreement dated , 19 , originally entered into by the County of Los Angeles with City succeeding to the County's interest therein. (ii) The parties hereto desire to extend the term of the Landscape Maintenance Agreement as set forth herein. B. Agreement. NOW, WHEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A above. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Landscape Maintenance Agreement referred to in Paragraph A (i) above, the parties hereto agree that the term of said agreement shall be, and the same hereby is, extended through and including June 30, 1991. 3. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Landscape Maintenance Agreement, as heretofore amended and/or extended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above. ATTEST: CONTRACTOR 1000 Mayor City Clerk 2 AGENDA NO. 12 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 MEETING DATE June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Agreement Between Diamond Bar and Pomona Valley Humane Society BACKGROUND: The City Council at the Public Hearing on May 15, 1990, on the 1990-91 Fiscal Year Budget, received an oral presentation from Pomona Valley Humane Society to continue animal control services for the City commencing July 1, 1990 - June 30, 1991. As presented at the Council Meeting, the Executive Director stated the maximum expense to the City would be Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) for the 1990-91 Fiscal Year. Further, this amount may be decreased by revenues generat- ed in Diamond Bar, should they exceed the fiscal projections. RECOMMENDATION• The City Council authorize the Agreement between Diamond Bar and the Humane So- ciety of Pomona to provide animal control services for the 1990-91 Fiscal Year. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: ��l� L' -Z la Robert L. Van Nort City Manager Narrative continued on next page. Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT May 24, 1990 AGENDA -DATE: JUNE 5, 1990 TO: CITY COUNCIL VIA: ROBERT L. VAN NORT, CITY MANAGER FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION ON GRAND AVENUE AT LONGVIEW DRIVE AND SUN0IITRIDGE DRIVE Formal bids for the subject project were opened and read aloud at 10:00 a.m. in the City Hall on May 24, 1990. An exact summary of the bids is attached, however, for your information the contractor along with his bid were as follows: 1. Hovey Electric, Inc. $136,042.00 2. Raymor Electric Co., Inc. $143,500.00 3. Steiny & Company, Inc. $168,271.00 4. Paul Gardner Corp. $168,990.00 Engineer's Estimate $160,000.00 The project consists of: 1. Traffic signal construction at Grand Avenue and Longview Drive. 2. Traffic signal construction at Grand Avenue and Summitridge Drive. We have had personal experience with this contractor on five similar projects over the past two years, and find his performance and quality impeccable. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: R WED B Y: ----------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant City Council - June 5, 1990 Award of Bid - Traffic Signal Construction at Grand Ave. at Longview Dr. & Summitridge Dr. SCHEDULE Page 2 After City Council approval, the contract will be executed within ten days, and all work will be completed within 60 days once the written "Notice to Proceed" is issued. The poles were ordered in April and typically take eight to twelve weeks to arrive from the manufacturer. FUNDING The City has funds available in the Grand Avenue Traffic Mitigation Fund. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive the bids and accept the bid of Hovey Electric, Inc., of Rancho Cucamonga, and award a contract to said company based upon the itemized prices in said bid for a total contract of $136,042.00. RLK:RPM: nb:2251:cc-db:ingview.sig 0 w w U w J a O CL O CL AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE SUZANNE BUDOVEC District Manager May 23, 1990 Mayor Gary Werner City of Diamond Bar 21660 Copely Drive #100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Gary: - I n GTE California Incorporates! Post Office Box 2920 Pomona, Ca 91769-2920 It is with sincere regret to inform you that I will no longer be associated with GTE Community Relations in the Diamond Bar Area. As you may have heard, GTE is involved in a major nationwide down sizing program. Unfortunately, my position, including that of your District Telecommunications and Public Affairs Liaison was one of those positions affected. Hal Overton, Division Public Affairs Manager, will be assuming my responsibilities and will become your new district contact with GTE. He can be reached at (714) 865-6061, and I know he looks forward to working with you. I would like to express my warmest gratitude to you, the city council and the entire city staff. The associations, kindness and friendships afforded me have been most rewarding and memorable. It's been my pleasure working with you all. Thanks again for all of your support. Sincerely, SUZANNE BUDOVEC District Manager cc: Hal Overton - GTE Diamond Bar City Council Bob Van Nort, City Manager A part of GTE Corporation /I"' PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1990 AS "FIRST AID KIT AND BOOR" MONTH IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE YEAR-LONG EARTHQUAKE SURVIVAL PROGRAM IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles adopted and implemented the Earthquake Survival Program which encourages residents to take a different precaution each month; and WHEREAS, the loss of life and property can be greatly reduced if appropriate preparedness measures are taken before a damaging earthquake; and WHEREAS, the month of June has been designated as the month to purchase a first aid kit and book in conjunction with the Earthquake Survival Program; and WHEREAS, all residents of Southern California are encouraged to take emergency preparedness precautions to make themselves more self-sufficient in the event of a catastrophic incident, such as a major earthquake; and WHEREAS, the year-long educational campaign, known as the Earthquake Survival Program is a convenient method for residents to better prepare themselves and also enhance their awareness of the ever-present threat of earthquakes; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar that the month of June, 1990 is FIRST AID KIT AND BOOR month in the City of Diamond Bar and encourages all residents to prepare themselves by having available at their residence and place of business a first aid kit and book. Further, it is recommended that residents become knowledgeable in first aid procedures by attending an accredited course of instruction. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar AGENDA NO.� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 29, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Postal Service BACKGROUND: This office has contacted the Pomona Branch of the United States Postal Service on several occasions and invited Postmaster Morton to present to the City Coun- cil the services provided to the City of Diamond Bar and answer any pertinent questions. On May 18, the Postmaster communicated to this office his desire to address/answer questions of City Councilmembers in a non-public forum. Based on this, Postmaster Morton declined to attend the City Council Meeting. Due to a willingness on the part of Postmaster Morton to cooperate with Council, a meet- ing was scheduled with the City Manager for Wednesday, May 23, at 3:00 p.m. to discuss the aforementioned items. It was disappointing when Postmaster Morton did not keep his scheduled appointment. The DBIA and the Community at large have suggested a public forum on the matter. Whereas, the Postmaster may amend his position and be present, it is still suggested that the Council gather input for use by Congressman Dreier in his efforts to have Congress regulate the mat- ter. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: Robert L. tafi Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney AR300.FRM 3/90 1 Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant The Diamond Bar Improvement Association Incorporated 1962 Post Office Boa 4085, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Play '14, 1990 Mr. Robert L. Van Nort City manager, Suite 330 21660 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765 Dear Mr. Van Nort: At their Play 8th meeting, the Board of Directors of the Diamond Bar Improvement Association approved a motion to ask that the City Council place on their agenda, at the earliest date possible, a discussion of the service rendered to the City of Diamond Bar by its branch of the U. S. Postal Service with an invitation to the Postmaster from Pomona in charge of this branch to attend the session and answer questions. I will appreciate your attention to this matter and notice of its addition to the agenda. Respectfully, /oe uzicka Cit Counc' Liaison Publishers of "The Windmill" AGENDA NO. -------- ____ ---- --------------- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT -------------------- DATE May 29, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Dennis A. Tarango, Acting Planning Director BY: Robert Searcy, Assistant Planning Director SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment, Zone Change 90-0028, the change of zone designation from R-1-6000 (Single Family Residence, High Density) to C -1 -DP (Restricted Business Zone with Development Program) on a 1.65 acre site located on the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. RECOMMENDED ACTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION: 1. Environmental Determination for Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. Approval of Zone Change from R1-6000 to C1 -DP. 3. Adoption of Ordinance 90 -XX -(1990) in support thereof. EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT THEREOF: Exhibits 1. Staff Report including Planning Commission resolution. 2. Application, initial study, and environmental checklist. 3. Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4. Traffic Report and addendum, and City Engineer's analysis. 5. Support Documents (site photos, radius map) (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: Robert L. Van Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney 1 Linda M agn use n S r. Acc oun tan t xN416t T- I. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a zone change to allow Restricted Commercial Development and uses on a site which currently is developed with a Single Family Resi- dence, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Zone C -2 -BE Developed with an AM/PM Mini -Mart; Zone R-3 Developed with a condominium complex. East - Zone R-1-6000 Developed with Single Family Res- idences. South - Zone M-1 ("Light Manufacturing) and currently developed as a recreational vehicle storage and sales lot. There is an application on file to convert the property to C -1 -DP. West - Zone C-1 (Restricted Business) developed with a pre-school on the site and office buildings across the street. C. General Flan Designation: The site lies beyond General Plan Boundary. D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently developed with a single family residence. Access to the property is taken from the North onto Lycoming Street. An open forty (40) foot wide flood channel separates the site from other single family residences located to the East. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing a zone change to upzone the site to allow restricted commercial develop- ment guided by a development program. At this time, no project has been proposed for site. 2 If a time extension is not granted, the Commis- sion/Council shall initiate proceedings to rezone such property to the zone in existence prior to the adoption of zone C -1 -DP or to such other zone as may be deemed appropriate. B. Issues: The primary issue of this application is relat- ed to land use compatibility with adjacent properties. The following sections address and discuss these issues: 1. Compatibility of Uses: There are a variety of land uses in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. There are single and multiple family units to the East, a convenience store and wholesale commercial uses to the North, a day care facility to the West as well as a residential development and a recrea- tional vehicle sales and storage facility located to the immediate South. This property is situated in a location that lends itself primarily to com- mercial uses. The site is served by a secondary highway (Brea Canyon Road) which separates the pr- operty from the residential development to the Wes- t. A forty (40) foot wide flood channel and a fif- teen (15) foot easement creates a barrier to the residences on the North and the East. 2. Traffic Issues: Any proposed use on this site sho- uld address the traffic which will be created as a result of the project. The report should identify techniques to resolve any negative impacts which may be identified. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of the initial study completed by the applicant, staff has found no significant impacts related to this zone change applica- tion. Traffic reports from a previously proposed pro- ject at this location and a traffic report prepared for an adjacent project were reviewed in consideration for this application (see attachments). Based on the analys- is of the data, a mitigated negative declaration has been prepared. III. FINDINGS:FACTS FOR The Commission must make all th following findings in order to approve this application: 1. That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning plan as it pertains to the area or district under consideration; and 2. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists within such area or district; and 3 3. That the particular property under consideration is .a proper location for said zone classification with such area or district; and 4. That placement of the proposed zone at such loca- tion will be in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare, and in conformance with good zoning practice; and 5. That the proposed zone change is consistent with the adopted Community Plan and the proposed General Plan for the area. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Progress Bulletin newspapers and properly posted, and notices sent to adjacent property owners within seven hundred (700) feet of the property. RS:ps 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSSION OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 90-0028 TO MODIFY A R-1 6000 ZONE DESIGNATION TO A C-1 DP ZONE ON A 1.65 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 21008 LYCOMING ROAD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) G. Miller Development, of Walnut California, has heretofore filed an application for approval of a Zone Change No.90-0028 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter inthis Resolution, the subject Zone Change is referred to as "the application". (ii) On May 14, 1990 the PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Diamond Bar, conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisite to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This PLANNING COMMISSION hereby specifically finds that all of facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this COMMISSION during the above -referenced public hearing on May 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this COMMISSION hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 21008 Lycoming with a gross area of 1.25 acres and is currently developed with a single family residence; and (b) The properties to the north of the subject site is an AM/PM Mini Mart and a condominium complex, the property to the south of the site consists of a recreational vehicle sales and storage facility, the property to the east is residential and is developed with single family residences, and the properties to the west are developed with single family residential homes and a day care center; and (c) The subject property consists of a single family residence with access to Lycoming Street and is surrounded by commercial and high density residential land uses; and (d) The site is sufficient in size and can provide adequate ingress and egress to allow commercial development in character with surrounding current land uses: 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this COMMISSION during the above -referenced May 14, 1990 public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this COMMISSION hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed zone change is in accord with the proposed General Plan, the objectives of the Community Plan and compatible with land uses surrounding said site. (b) That the proposed zone change, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the zone change complies with all applicable provisions of the City Planning and Zoning Code. 4. This COMMISSION hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this COMMISSION hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this COMMISSION, hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: (1) This approval shall apply to the zone change for approval of C-1 DP, restricted commercial develop- ment with a development program. (2) The C-1 DP zone designation shall run permanently with the title of said real property or until such time the COMMISSION approves a change. (3) Any project proposed to develop the site shall be in compliance with zone C-1 requirements, submitted with a development program, and shall be approved by the COMMISSION. 6. The Secretary to this COMMISSION shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED -AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY: Chairman David Schey, ATTEST: Dennis A. Tarango, Secretary to the PLANNING COMMISSION I, Dennis A. Tarango, Secretary to the PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION held on the 14th day of May, 1990, by the following vote-to•wit: AYES: [COMMISSIONERS:] NOES: [COMMISSIONERS:] ABSENT: [COMMISSIONERS:] ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, HEREIN DESCRIBED, FROM THE R-1-6000 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 6,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) ZONE TO THE C1 -DP (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL -DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) ZONE. (ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-0028)., A. Recitals. (i) Gary and Cathleen Miller have heretofore filed an application to amend the official zoning map of the City of Diamond Bar, reclassifying certain real property, described as Los Angeles County Assessor Parcel No. 8719-13-09 and generally located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Road. ("Said real property" hereinafter in this Ordinance). (ii) Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein, is a proposed official zoning map amending the official zoning map of the City of Diamond Bar by reclassifying said real property from Single Family Residential (R-1-6,000) to Restricted Commercial Development Program (C1 -DP) zone, as proposed by the applicant. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized Municipal Corporation of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 57376, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 11 thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code (as subsequently amended by Ordinance Nos. 15 and 15A of the City of Diamond Bar) contains the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles, now currently applicable to development applications (including the subject application) within the City of Diamond Bar. (iv) On April 23, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the subject application and concluded said hearing on May 14, 1990. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 55360, this City Council finds and determines that: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the reclassification of said real property to the land use requested in the application will be consistent with the General Plan proposal which is to be studied and adopted by the City Council, within a reasonable time; (b) There is a substantial probability that the reclassification of said real property, as proposed by the application, will not be a substantial detriment to, nor interfere with, the future adopted General Plan for the area of the subject real property; (c) The site of the proposed reclassification, as set forth in the application, is suitable for any of the land uses permitted within the proposed zone district; and (d) The proposed reclassification as set forth in the application is reasonable and beneficial at this time, and, further, said reclassification will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding properties. Section 3. The City Council hereby finds that a negative declaration has been prepared with respect to the project identified in this Resolution and, further, that said negative declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder. Further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said negative declaration. Section 4. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth hereinbelow, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project, no significant environmental effects will occur. 2 Section 5. The City, Council finds that the facts supporting the above specified findings are set forth in the negative declaration, the staff report and exhibits appended thereto, and the information provided to this City Council during the public hearing conducted with respect to the project and the negative declaration. Section 6. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Diamond Bar hereby is amended to reclassify that certain real property, hereinabove described, from the R-1-6,000 (Single Family Residential, 6,000 square foot minimum lot size) zone to the C1 -DP (Restricted Commercial -Development Program) zone, all as set forth in the Official Zoning Map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1990. I, , City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 1990, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar. 3 07 it Proje.:t No.: TR/PM: Lead Sec.; Z! C., CAT Ex.: 4-A0 Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning ZONING AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATION As required by Chapters 22 16 22.56 & 21.40 of the Los Angeles County Code The following information is necessary for the review of ALL applications. Failure to furnish information will delay action. A extra sheets if necessary. Please read instructions carefully. RECORD OWNERS) APPLICANT APPLICANT'S AGENT (Engineer, Licensed Surveyor, Other and please indicate if engineer is al: agen t) Francis I1. Maloney t••'ary A. "ialoney G. Miller DevelopmentName Jan C. Dabney Name_ _---_. —= Name Address 21009 Lycoming St Address 721 S. Brea Canyon R(kidress 721 S. Brea Canyc City Wa 1 not f Cal i fnrni a city Walnut California _ _ City Walnut,—Calif ornia 71 594-6966 Zip91789 Phone �14) 594-6' Zip 91789 Phone 1714f 595-1447 Zip 91789phone 1 `� _ i (Attach separate sheet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures directors of corporations.) CONSENT: l consent to the submission of the application accompanying this request. q Signed cCt YG,, Date _(�� • c1 ! ' lt- (All record Hers► l CERTIFICATION: l hereby certify, under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best knowledge. Q Date Signed (Applicant or Ap licant's Agent) Location 21008 Lycoming Street, Walnut, CA. 91789. (Street address or distance from nearest cross street) between S E Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street (Street) (Street) in Zone R-1-6000 (Land Use, not postal zone) Zoned District San Jose HNM/FS111H333 CSI N/A TBG 97-D2 Assessor 8719/8760 CT4033-12 Planning Area East San Gabriel Valley _ USGS can Dimas Contract City None Supervisorial District 1 General Plan Category Residential Medium Densit Local Plan Category (if applicable) 1.25 Project Size (gross acres) Previous Cases None__ None Local Plan None Acres Present Use of Site Use applied for Commercial C-3 Project Density Domestic Water SourceWalnut Valley Water Distric Local District ._ Company/Drsn;ct Count Los Angeles County Method of Sewage Disposal y .—...�. Sanitation District Los ading of Lots by Applicant? Yes_ No X Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project) If petitioning for zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to the change. See attached Legal Description APPROPRIATE BURDENS OF PROOF MUST ACCOMPANY EACH TYPE OF REQUEST – Check each request applied for and complete appropriate sections. PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST Countywide/local Plan or Area Plan Land Use Map Change: From To Acres From To Acres Other Countywide (Gen, Dev„ Housing & Spec. Mgrnt.) Map Change: From To Acres From To Acres Identify Text Changes) to Countywide/Local or Area Plan Desired: Total Project Units Currently Allowed By: (a) CW Plan IN Local Plan Total Project Units Permitted If: (a) CW Plan Amended (b) Local Plan Amended Total Acres Involved: (a) (b) SERVICES Existing and Proposed: Gas & Electric Education Fire Sher iff ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Access Zone: From Acres To Acres R-1-6000 1-25 _('-3 1 -25 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, NONCONFORMING REVIEW, AND OTHER PERMITS nPVPl nz ment Prn ram (nP) Ord. No. 99 "n 030 Permit Type 9 Project Site: 1,25 Acres 1 Area devoted to: structures 1 open space NSA Gross Area No. of Lots and Residential Project N/A N/A Proposed density N/A Gross Area No. of floors Units/Acres Non Residential Project: No. of bldgs. 1— No. of floors _2 Gross floor area N/A Operating hours N/A No. of employees N/A No. of shifts N/A Maxium number of employees per shift NSA Assembly and Dining Uses: N/A (Occupant load for buildings per Building & Safety) Non Residential Parking: Type Required Provided Total Required: N/A Total Provided: Additional Information: None The following must be completed for HOUSING PERMITS: Units allowed without bonus: Units Density Bonus Required: % Units Total Units including bonus: Units SUBDIVISION REQUEST TOTAL GROSS ACRES TENTATIVE MAP NUMBER LOTS: Existing Proposed STAGE: T_ RV _ AM _ RN_ RA_ FN WR MAP: T_ RR(FD) RR(LD) RV_ AO_ LL VESTING: (Y) (N) LOT TYPE;OWN'SHIP (Circle);NO. LOTS;NO. UNITS;AC LOT TYPE OWN'SHIP (Circle) NO. LOTS NO. UNITS ACRES SF MH I NC CC L DUP 1 NC CC L MF INC CCL OS I NC CC L R PF I NC CC L C I NC CC L I 1 NC CC L Sch. Dist(s) UN STAFF PURPOSES ONLY HS LS SCM Date Cities: LA_ BH_.LC_PM_Other Counties: LA_VT_SB_OR_ K_Other Agencies/Companies: MWP—DWP_CWP_SCE_SCG_PT_GT_ATS_SPT_UPR_MSHC_SCRC ANG—PNF_ Other CALTRANS: Y_N_Name(s): PCH_ TCR _DCR_Other Route(s): HIGHWAYS MISC.: PROJECT NO.: Q CASES: PLAN AMENDMENT HOUSING PERMIT OTHER ONE CHANGE PARKING PERMIT PARCEL MAP No. Brown Line y cup OAK TREE No. Blue Line VARIANCE TRACT No. Brown Line NON CONFORMING REVIEW No. Blue Line FILED FEE M=4 RECEIPT NO. ���� FILE COPY 9/asllr9 C,17 - y cST los Angel" county WARTU T OF R AKWAL PLANNING =0 W" Two* grow Loo Ang"s CaMomia 90012 974.8411 iw. a HW. AICP SUBJECT: NOTICE OF CONS.�ULTATION PROJECT NO. f97 0 75 LOCA' ION: "U / 170#4 `5 TAiPL / '�Y�� -YeZAfIA) ' ANd RK44 01iq A*7 40AeQ A -30900 - The staff of the Department of Regional Planning is reviewing environmental information for the project identified above. Preliminary determination indicates that the following environmental document is required: [) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [{:� NEGATIVE DECLARATION [� NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with modified project (see Initial study for changes). The above determination is preliminary and will not be finalized until comments are received from responsible agencies. To assist us in our final determination, it is requested that your department review the attached information and provide comments on any potential environmental effects of the project. If your agency feels an EIR is necessary, we would appreciate information on the scope and content of the environmental information germane to your statutory responsibilities. Please be specific and concise in order to avoid confusion and delays. Any suggestions for project changes should be included in your reply. Please note that if the mitigating measures can reduce the impact to insignificant levels, the project can still qualify for a Negative DeclForttyo rconveniencerovideswechavees are enclosed of ormtto ed into the proje expedite your response. (OVER) STAFF USE ONLY - PROJWP NG M CASES: Z C * * * * INITIAL STUDY COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING Location: Description of Project: All T4" �JSc'-+LL G s/ /S , a . iPe f�i/,dross Cori-/a/nih,9 C a�Cz� = �, voo _s.F. avAr_�h 4enc /, z ti{ Obi c� aF FIoQr -a•-G �/'I�'a/ DISC' ... � C`1tJi'1!'1��, . •T svu�i �s ave /e✓ says a ,. �c�l��� -� die wcsf /s � d�.y czrrc �e�-i ��� Gross Area:. oG /is h /�7�vS{�'/ac/ ahs/ e,y,01�e ua / !r s�S 2r n�I res . Cork% S /l/E Zoning: General Plan: 341pf m � Community/Areawide Pian: ��/T�'!/C7 D�D�%iidnc� ��%1 C��' � ���1 • - 1 - T4" �JSc'-+LL G s/ /S , Envirormentai Setting: '�.�"e'SP_✓1-� I - ex 140'74_& . /9aI/-4CCP74 '/0 S �/'I�'a/ DISC' ... � C`1tJi'1!'1��, -�._.-�1e svu�i �s ave /e✓ says a sem✓icy �c�l��� -� die wcsf /s � d�.y czrrc �e�-i ��� -.A o r �r� we5� are a �%!/X�i'/rQ oG /is h /�7�vS{�'/ac/ ahs/ e,y,01�e ua / !r s�S 2r n�I res . Cork% S /l/E Zoning: General Plan: 341pf m � Community/Areawide Pian: ��/T�'!/C7 D�D�%iidnc� ��%1 C��' � ���1 • - 1 - Major projects in area: Project Numbers Description NOTE: For EIR's, above projects are not sufficient for c=ulative analysis. REVIEWING AGENCIES Responsible Agencies Special Reviewing Agencies Regional Significance None Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region Lahontan Region Coastal Commission Trustee Agencies None State Fish and Game State Parks None Topanga-Las Virgenes Conservation District Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy - National Parks National Forest / Edwards Air Force Base - 2- None SCAG Criteria Air Quality / Water Resources Santa moni-a Mtns Area individual pages for details) 1 g:ViRCN-m—r.AL I?,2ACT RR-r4R", ina�n� as there iS auastantia_ �:dzxs tZat the pro-Ject may have a significant impact due -= fac=rs listed anew as 'significant'. �'% De+,_=1,1atian appealed—see attad-Ad sheet. mr.�iz=men al Finding (Negative Declarati=S) An Initial stL�ey yes prepared cn t'sis pro:e&- in c=rlianca with the State Cc;A it�ic'elines and t:�e :nvizormemtal zrpertirr Pz s:uzes of t5e Cata:tY Of Los Ancelas. It �.as to fired L'.3at this project will nct exceed t,. established t'zzes:^.oZd teria for any srvizormental/sezvice fac'..oz and, as a result, will not have a signi- ficant effect on the Physical envizorment. N,1n Initial Study was prepared cn this prrrject in c=pliancr vita Lue state C ,.A gide? inns and L'x ervi=o=mntal retorting ptccadures of t!v C.,:mty of :,CS krge/es. It Vee originally rete=iced tl'at tie proFosed protect Zay exceed estabiisl^,�: t,res- told =it ria. i::e apolicant has agreed to modification of t'.* project so teat it can nae be dettmlmd L,)ai t,* project will not Iwm a significant ef: ec: on t?2 physical W.V4=rmesnt. ThA mcdific3tion to mi t4 tis i�nract(3) is ide*ntifiS on L'te ,i eptar,cr Let:= i=luded as part of this Ini tial St=. - X'i'F: Findings :or Dvi-C me!:tal Dope& 7!"Cr`3 v-411 be prepurad as a JeP&r3t* dCczoert follcwim t.'''s p,:bl3c beazirq cm the Rata: Oft l r_ft$aS i' G S1c.zT 1C.:.Zst Dwmc t' Pote ,,tial C ee^► iv is Jly=i ��i..ia�L�a %t�^tE^�lS�C31 Flocd 6 ' F za 1 7 'RAI. -R .UF4- Water Qual i t-� 19! Air Quail 10 Fsiota 11 C,,L. Cultural Resources 12! VISJAL vis�:I Qualltles 131 Se'-YI . Traffic/Ac-c—ess 1 Seyrace Disxsal 15 Educatzcn 16 Fire/sie=i 1r Utilities 1181 1 {r, General 191 �1v3_�r.. Sa_et' s01 ,M-, ATir.:fi: i�1 t. a baSiS of this Zni dial St:-�7, L�'t Ve!.d�'+�2L1t of itEc, onal P?ann1.-jg ._:-5 t:.at tlpCti*f11C.i::g e^•VIIOCrE1t31 Cc t: ?--? iminary FINAL L7 Z7 NEmTIVB D=APATICN, imsrn c? -n as L'�e rzcS:osez+ er ect gill not `a"e a aicni scant effect on tl�'e envi:ccmznt. Zj NEMTIVE DEC- ir�4a�r?� as L'�e +ar�ges raguizad for t.-* 'Conditiers", will raduce impacts to insignificant levels (ere page C . 1 g:ViRCN-m—r.AL I?,2ACT RR-r4R", ina�n� as there iS auastantia_ �:dzxs tZat the pro-Ject may have a significant impact due -= fac=rs listed anew as 'significant'. �'% De+,_=1,1atian appealed—see attad-Ad sheet. mr.�iz=men al Finding (Negative Declarati=S) An Initial stL�ey yes prepared cn t'sis pro:e&- in c=rlianca with the State Cc;A it�ic'elines and t:�e :nvizormemtal zrpertirr Pz s:uzes of t5e Cata:tY Of Los Ancelas. It �.as to fired L'.3at this project will nct exceed t,. established t'zzes:^.oZd teria for any srvizormental/sezvice fac'..oz and, as a result, will not have a signi- ficant effect on the Physical envizorment. N,1n Initial Study was prepared cn this prrrject in c=pliancr vita Lue state C ,.A gide? inns and L'x ervi=o=mntal retorting ptccadures of t!v C.,:mty of :,CS krge/es. It Vee originally rete=iced tl'at tie proFosed protect Zay exceed estabiisl^,�: t,res- told =it ria. i::e apolicant has agreed to modification of t'.* project so teat it can nae be dettmlmd L,)ai t,* project will not Iwm a significant ef: ec: on t?2 physical W.V4=rmesnt. ThA mcdific3tion to mi t4 tis i�nract(3) is ide*ntifiS on L'te ,i eptar,cr Let:= i=luded as part of this Ini tial St=. - X'i'F: Findings :or Dvi-C me!:tal Dope& 7!"Cr`3 v-411 be prepurad as a JeP&r3t* dCczoert follcwim t.'''s p,:bl3c beazirq cm the Rata: Oft PRW S`: --MANC'S/C3I-- =TONE prior to ( Y recordation of the 'final map ( ) issuance of a buiiding permit and as a means of mit gating potential environmental impacts, it must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Planning Cmm oission that sewer. connection permits car be obtained from ( ) county Sanitation District No. ( ) Las tirgenes Municipal_ Water District or its legal successor that meg' the requirements of the California Regional Water Duality Control_ Board pursuant to Division 7 of the Water Code. prior to alteration of any streambeds, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant snail enter into an agreement with the California State Department of Fish and Game, pursuant to Sections 1601 through 160: of the State Fish and Game Code. prior to ( ) tentative anprova_ ( Y scheduling before the Zoning Board ( ) scheduling before the Regional Planning Commission, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental in— pacts,-the applicant shall submit an archaeology report for the entire project site (unless otherwise noted) prepared by a qualified archaeologist, and comply with mitigation, measures suggested by the archaeologist and approved by the Department of Regional Planning. % ( ) scheduling before Prior to ( ) tentative approval ( ) scheduling before the Zoning Board the Regional Planning Commission, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant shall agree to suspend construction, in the vicinity of a cultural resource encountered during development of the site, and leave the resource in place until a qualified archaeologist can examine them and determine appropriate mitigation, measures. The applicant shall agree to comply with mitigation measures recommended by the archaeolo- gist and approved by the Department of Regional Planning. As a condition of ( ) final approval ( ) the grant ( ) approval of the zoning ordinance, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant shall dedicate to the County of Los Angeles, ( ) the right to pronibit construction over an area demarcated or. the ( ) tentative map ( Y plot plan, ( ) construction of more than one residence or com- mer al unit and related accessory building on any one lot on the project site. A note to this effec_ shall be ( l placed on `final map or or. the Crant Waiver ( ) recorded on the t__l_ 17 prior to ( ) tentative approval ( ) recordation of the final map ( ) scheduling before the Zoning Board ( scned::'inc before the Regional Planning Commission., and as a means of m_tigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant shall drill and test flow a well(s) to the satisfaction of the Department of Pudic Works/Engineering Division. A warning note shay- be l ) placed on the final mar and in the Cs&Rs ( ) re order on the title, indicating that the area has a limited groundwater supply and that water may no-, be available during periods of severe drought. A copy of the ( ) C:&Rs shall_ be submitted to the Department of Reciona. Planning and subsequently recorded with the final map ( ) __tie shall oe submitted to the Departmen_ of Regional Planning for approval. _/7 As a condition of l ) final approval ( ) the grant ( 1 approval of the zoning ord'_nance, and as a means of mi_igatinc potential environmental impacts, a warning note shay_ ( ! be placer in the CC&Rs ( ) recorded on the title, indicating that the area has a limited groundwater supply during periods of severe drougnt. A copy of the ( ) CC&Rs shay. be sucmitted to the Department of Regional Pla nine for approval and subsequently recorded with the -final_ ma_r. i ) title snal': be sutxr'_tted to the Department of Regional Planning for approval. / Prior to recordation of the final mapp, the subdivider shall be required to enter into ar. agreement with the Coun`_y to pay to the County a sum not to exceed :3,50o.0o per res dentia: � ., unit, and no- to be less thar, s2,000.00 per residential unit for the purpose of con _ipuu ng to the proposed Road Benefit District prior to occupancy or upor demand of payment by the County Road Commission. Security for the performance of said agreement shall be guaranteed by the filing of a bond by a duly authorized surety. Prior to scheduling for public hearing, and as a means of mitigating any environmental impar_: associated with the distance of the project to the nearest fire station, the applicant shall agree to comply with recommendations of the County Forester and Fire Warden. i See attacne- paged for additional_ Prtject/Changes./Conditions - 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1.0 Hazard Factors 1.1 Geotechnical SETTING/IMPACTS: Y N a. the project site located in an active or potentially active fault zone? b. 0 D—Is the project site located in an area containing a major landslide(s)? C. f7 �-Is the project site located in an area having high slope instability? d. El CD-�Is the project site subject to high subsidence, high groundwater level, or hydrocompaction? e. 0 Q --Is the proposed project considered a sensitive use (school, hospital, public assembly site) located in close proximity to a significant geotechnical hazard? f. D F-1 Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: II Building Ordinance No. 2225 -- Sections 308B, 309, 310 and 311 and Chapters 29 and 70. Other considerations: U Lot Size D Project Design CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on, or be impacted by, geotechnical factors? D Yes a ----No 5 1.2 Flood SET TING/IM?ACTS:_ Y a. Lj N 'Is a major drainage course, as identified on USGS quad sheets by a dashed line, located on the project site? - - - -- b, D--T-s the project site located within or does it contain a floodway or floodplain? c. '7' --is Ithe project site located in or subject to high mudflow conditions? d, Fti1i the project contribute, or be subject to, high erosion and debris deposition from run-off? e. other factors?- '_'LITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: t7 Building Ordinance No. 2225 --Section 308A } I Flood Control District Drainage Concept El ordinance No. 12,114 t.Floodways) Other considerations: Q Lot Size Project Design CONCLUSICN: Considering the above information, could the project have a sianificant impact on, or be impacted by, flood (hydrological) factors? V. es 6 1.3 ?ire SETTING/IMPACTS a, Q�Zs the project site located in a high Fire hazard area (Fire Zone 4 or Quinton/Redgate fire classification)? b. ❑ �-Is the project site in a high fire hazard area and served by inadequate access due to length, width, surface material, turnarounds, or grade? C. � ❑ � 'Is the project site in a high fire hazard area and has more than 7: dwelling units on a single access? d. r--1 G%Is the protect site locat_c in 3n area havir:g inadequate water and press -ire to meet _ire -'low standards? e. Cj E -r' --Is the project site located in close proximity to cotential dangerous fire hazard conditions/uses (such as refineries, -'lam ables, explosives :manufacturing)? -',L7❑Y—"J es the proposed use constitute a pot_ntialla dangerous fire hazard condition/use? g. ❑ 7,e—'Other Factors? il— M!-- IGATION MEASURES: ..__:-ard mitigation measures are: ❑ Fire Ordinance No. 294' F7 water Ordinance No. 7834 " Fire Prevention Manual Regulation No. 12 Other considerations: ❑ Project Design CONCLUSION: Considering the above inf--rmation, could the project have a significant impact on, or be impactaa by, fire hazard .:actors? 1.4 Noise SETTING/IMPACT: Y N a. �Is the project site located near a high noise source (airports, railroads, freeways, industry)? b. Q Will the project substantially increase ambient noise levels, including those associated with special equipment (such as air conditioning units) or parking areas associated with the project? C. 2�ls the proposed use considered sensitive (school, hospital, senior citizen facility)? d. Q Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: ❑ Building Ordinance No. 2225 -- Chapter 35 Noise Ordinance No. 11,778 Other considerations: Q Lot Size Q Project Design II Compatible Use CONCLUSIONS: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on, or be adversely impacted by, noise? E] yes No 8 2.o Natural Resources 2.1 Water Qualitv SETTING/IMPACT: a, ��Will the proposed project require the use of a private sewage disposal system? If the answer is yes, is the project site located in an area having known septic tank limitations due to high groundwater or other geotechnical limitations? Lf-_ Is the project proocsina on-site systems located in close proximity to a drainage course? b. Q Will the erecosed project place industrial waste (corrosive or tox_c materials)into a pr,vats sewage disposal system or a commun "— system: Is the protect site located in an area having known water quality problems and proposing the use 01 individual water wells? d. C -other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: Health ordinance No. 7583 --Chapter 5 U plumbing Code --Ordinance No, 2269 C Industrial Waste Permit j—; Lot Design other can I Lot Size CONCLUSIONS: Considecing the above in*armation, could the project have a ici*icani impac' or., or be impacted Sv, wat=r quali snty Problems? 0 Yes Iv 2.2 Air Quality SETT.NG/IMPACT: Y N a. 71711 --will the proposed project exceed the State's criteria for regional significance (generally (a) 500 dwelling units for residential uses or (b) 40 gross acres, 650,000 square feet of floor area, or L,000 employees non-residential uses)? D. �s the proposal considered a sensitive use (schools, hospitals, parks) and located near a freeway or heavy industrial use? c. ill the project increase local emissions to a szanificant extent due to increased traffic congestion or use of a parking structure? d. Will the project generate or is the site in close proximity to sources which create obnoxious odors and/or hazardous emissions? e. C Q Other factors: MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mit eat'_on measures are: Health and Safetv Code, Section 40500 Other considerations: El Project Design ❑ Air Quality Management Plan CONCLUSIONS: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant im_act on, or be impacted by, air quality? _ Y e sN o out 2.3 Biota SETTING/IMPACTS a. Is the project site located within a Significant Ecological Area or Significal Ecological Area Buffer? b. El---D—oes the project site contain a major riparian habitat? C. ❑Does the project site contain oak or other unique native trees? d. f7 [D Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Other considerations: Q Lot Size FJ Project Design a Oak Tree Permit CONCLUSIONS: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on biotic resources? Yes° 11 3.0 Cultural Resources/Visual 3.1 Archaeological/Historical/Paleontological SETTING/IMPACTS Y N a. ❑ Is the project site in or near an area captaining known archaeological resources or containing features (drainage course, spring, knoll, rock out- croppings, or oak trees) which indicate potential archaeological sensitivity? b, Q Does the project site contain rock formations indicating potential paleontological resources? c. Q [D --D-oes the project site contain known historic structures or sites? d. Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Other considerations: L_.i Lot Size - Q Project Desijn CONCLUSIONS: Consicering the above information, could the project hav= a significant impact on archaeological, historical, or paleonzo0:1:3.1 resources? t ] Yes 2 -*--N0 12 ^ z' sual Qualities S-FT-TING/IMPACTS: a. ! Is the n~ �ec- site substantially visible from, or L— Will 1_ Obs-rU �.ews along a SCeni, highway (as shown on -he Seenic riahway Element) or located ' within a scenic c-rriao_ _he� pr substantially visible from or will it s .; �� ec obstruct views :rom a regional riding or hiking trail? c. �is -he project =_i`_e located in an undeveloped or undis- turbed area which contains unique aesthetic features? d. 7-;�-'Is the proposed use out -of -character in comparison to adjacent- uses because of height, bulk, or other features? e. �Wi11 the project obstruct unique views from sur -rounding residential uses? r, C =,---will the prcject create substantial sun shadow or glare problems? g, El L-7- `Other factors. MITIGATION MEASURES Other considerations:L-JLot Size u Lot Design Compatible Use CONCLUSION: Considerina the above information, could the project have a significant impact on scenic qualities. 7 Yes 13 4.0 Services 4.1 Traffic/Access SETTING/IMPACTS: y N a. Does the project contain 25 dwelling units, or more and located in an area with known congestion problems (mid -block or intersections)? -r' :�. Q Will the CrC]eCt result in anv hazardcus=ra-_iC conditions? C. Will the project result in parking problems with a subsequent impact on traf`ic? d, Q During an emercency (other thanbi_VSs :Lazar =) , ni �, i .or e e-�e c inadequate access result in pro .e - _^� VeLI1C1�5 Or resider -c/e�`.' cyee5 in _ --- _ Other `actors? .�. MITIGATION MEASURES: Other considerations: ❑ 2r^ject Oesicn CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could t'ae r=jGct :nave a significant impact an tae hysical environment due to traffic/access? -! e s � �I C 4.2 Sewage Disposal SETTING/IMPACTS: Y N a. If served by a community sewage system, are there any known capacity problems at the treatment plant? b. Cj [2 ----Are there any known capacity problems in the sewer lines serving the project site? c. ether factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: Plumbing Code --Ordinance No. 2269 D Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste Ordinance No. 6130 Other considerations: CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on the physical environment due to sewage disposal facilities? Yes No 15 4.3 Education SETTING/IMPACTS: Y N a. Q Are there known capacity problems at the district level? b. ❑ Q Are there known capacity problems at individual schools which will serve the project site? c. II a Are there any known student transportation problems? d. 7 Q Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Other considerations: Q SB 201 Funds F1 Site Dedication CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on the physical environment due to educational facilities/services? Yes [] No 16 4.5 Utilities/Other Services SETTING/IMPACTS: Y N a. ❑ �Is the project site in an area known to have an inadequate water supply to meet domestic needs? b. Q �Is the project site in an area known to have an inadequate water supply and/or pressure to meet fire fighting needs? C. r7 Are there any known problems with providing other utility services, such as electricity, gas, propane? d. Q Are there any known service problem areas? e. �! [3""'Other factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: Plumbing Code (Ordinance No. 2269) Q Water Ordinance No. 7834 Other considerations: E] Lot Size Q Project Design CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on the physical environment due to utilities/services? Yes 'No 18 5.0 Other Factors 5.1 General Factors SETTING/IMPACTS: Y N a. Will the project result in an inefficient use of energy resources? b. DK -Will the project result in a major change in the pattern, scale, or character of the general area or community? c. ❑ Will the project result in a significant increase in light and/or glare? d. ❑ �W 11 the project result in a significant reduction in the amount of agricultural land? e. (7 Q1'--0ther factors? MITIGATION MEASURES: Standard mitigation measures are: 7 State Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 5, T-20 (Energy Conservation) Other considerations: Lot Size Q Project Design Compatible Use CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could the project have a significant impact on the physical :nvironment due to Q Yes �o 19 5.2 Environmental Safetv SETT ING/ I IMPACTS y a. N Are any hazardous material=_ used, produced, or stored on-site? b, E] Are any hazardous wastes stored on-site? c. Q Ej Are any pressurized tanks to be used on-site? d.[ Are any residential units, schools, or hospitals r'ac4-'7 e. locatea w --a=n D00 -- Other .-"actors? MITIGATION MEASURES: CONCLUSION: Considering the above information, could -he p.o;ect have a significant impact on public safety? Y e s I-- -t "0 441 INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): G. Miller Development Name 721 S Brea Canyon Road Address Walnut, California ( 714) 594-i966 -- phone dumber Project Representative: Jan C. Dabney (STAFF USE) PRO= NUMBER (s) : �v �vame 721 S. Brea Canvon Road Suite 7 dress Walnut. California - (7145 9 4- 7568 ---- phone Number 1. Action requested and project description: Zone change from R-1-6000 to C-3. 2. Stmt location of project: 21008 Lycominct Street 3a. Present use of site: Single Family Residential 3b. Previous use of site or structures: Same 4. Please list all previous cases (if any) related to tais project: None 5. Other related permit approvals required. Specify type and granting agency. None — 6. Are you planning future phases of t`zis project? /X/ /N/ If yes explain: After the zone chancre is approved a commercial building will be constructed at a later date. — 7. Project area: Existing 3. Number of floors: 1 Covered by structures , paving: 4,360 S . F . 9. Present zoning: R-1-6000 Landscaping, open space: 32,660 S .F. Total area: 37,025 S.F. Domestic Public 10. Water and seaer service: Sewers Water _ does service exist 3t sit_? /X/ /N/ /V /N/ I1: y�s, :2O p ul"JE'yors ;ld`1E_' C:3p•iC i :y ~O "1L" -T- /y/ /N/ of pro;er-t and all other approved If h-Niestic water or public sew -1--s are not iv?ilaole, �iow :rill these set: -;Ices ':)e - 1 - Residential projects: 11. Nuru_)er and, type of units: N/A ^-------- _-- 12. Schools: ti'nat school district(s) serves tele property? N/A Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs? /Y/ /N/ If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? N/A Non -Residential projects: 13. Distance to nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) 30 Feet 14. Number and floor area of buildings: N/A 15. Number of employees and shifts: 16. Maximum amployees per shift: N/A 18. Identify any: End products Ne ne Waste products None deans of disposal None 17. Operating hours: N/A 19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? /Y/ /A�/ If yes, explain: 20. Do your operations require any pressurized tanks? /Y/ /IW If yes, explain: 21. Iden,.ify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. None 22. will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway? /Y/ /DF If yes, explain: - 2 - B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATIC 1. Envirormental Setting -- Project Site a. Existing use%structures Single Family_ Residential. Existing single_ story___ dwelling detached garage and -various out b. Topography; slopes Less than o __-------------------- - *c. vegetation None -------- ----- _^--- - ----- *d. Animals None — ---- *�. watercourses Adj ecent concrete L . A. F . C . D . Channel f. Cultural/historical resour::es None ------ g. Other None --------- 2. Environmental Setting -- Surrounding Area a. Existing uses/structures (types, densities) : Residential and Commercial Medium _ Density. -- b. Topography,/slopes Less $ *c. vegetation None *d. Animals None *e. watercourses None f. Cultural/historical resources None g. Omer None 3. Are there any major trees on and nu^u�er• Fruits and Palm the site, including oak trees? /N/ If yes, tie - _ Trees 48 total. -- - 4. �i?ll any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns., er_r If _ves, explain: ;�e changed through project development.: /Y/ /g/ --- tiAnscaers are riot required1f the aro^ does Clot co ncxt�r 1, UndevClO(�eu lana. B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (cont.) 5. grading: Will the project _ _ I.f yes, how :many vJill it be require grading? /Y/ /X/ cubic yards? balanced on site? f // /N/ If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited"? 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other-;iajor geologic hazards on the property (including uncanpacted fill)? /Y/ /iI/ It yes, explain: 7. Is the property located wit1iin a high fire hazard area (hillsides wit"I moderately dense vegetation? /Y/ /W/ Distance to nearest fire station: 3. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: None -- Noise to be generated by project: N/A — 9. Fumes: Odors generated by project: None Could toxic fumes be generated? Ne 10. What energy -conserving designs or n;taterial will be used? N/A CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. / Date: 1-19-89 a (Signature) For: G. Miller Development - 4 - city of Diamond Bar Initial Study For Page 1 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE ' SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 7148 K 714-860-3117 A �t�%:.��i�i::L�;!:R,'.•�I�.�'v:•�, ••qG.S�� .i�hf?�Yll��¢FpSS.'}f:•int i'n�C•:M �i:. � i.fi:�iF�- wk f I. Background: 1. Name of Applicant: 2, Address and Ph -+ Ck of Proponent: 9 " & t 4. Date -of Epyir,;QrPental information Submittal: 5. Date o`Lnv3nmental Checklist Submittal: 6. Lead Agen Agcy mw4upulllj 7. Name of Pro nos I ff applicable (Tract No. U Subdivision): P 8. Related Applications (under the authority of this environmental determination): Yes No Variance: Conditional Use Permit: Zone Change: General Plan Amendment: (Attach Completed Environmental Information Form) ------------- - WERNER GARY G. MILLER JOHN A- FORB'NG PHYLLIS E. pApEN. PAUL V. HORCHER GARY H. Councilmernbc Councilmember PH Mayor Mayor pro Tern Cound1mcmber CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPE ROBERT L. VAN NORT City Manager City at Diamond Bar initial Study Form Page 2 Il. Environmental Impacts: (Explanations and additional information to supplement all "yes" and 'possibly" answers are required to be submitted on attached sheets) Yes No Possibly 1. Earth. Will the proposal result In: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? ✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition, erosion of stream banks or land adjacent to standing water, changes in siltation, deposition or other processes which may modify the channel of constant or intermittently flowing water as well as the areas surrounding permanent —� or intermittent standing water? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such s earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any changes in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result In: a. Changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface run-off? c. Alterations of the course or flow of flood waters? d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality including but not limited to dissolved oxygen and turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? —� g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Form City of Diamond Bar Initial Studyage 3 Yes No Possibly 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change i the crops, aof nd specie ,plants)?ouber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, gj b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of plants? —�L— c. Reduction in the size of sensitive habitat areas or plant communities which are recognized as sensitive? d. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? e. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will theproposalresult in: a. Change in the animals includingvers eptifesf fish and'or number of shellfish, benthi organismsecies fand insects)? ds, land b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the normal migration / or movement of resident species? d. Reduction in size or deterioration in quality of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _---- 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Significant increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels —� 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal result In: —� a. Significant new light and glare or contribute significantly to existing levels of light and glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use in an area? i/ 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: —� a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal Involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? —� b. Probable interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? city of Diamond Bsrinitial Study Form Page 4 Yes No Possibly 11. Population. Will the proposal: or growth rate of the human population of an area? a. Alter the location, distribution, density, V 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect: a. Existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result In: a. Generation of Substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and goods. e. Alterations to waterbc me, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal: a. Have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1. Fire protection? 2. Police protection? 3. Schools? 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? 5. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 6. Other govemmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing energy sources or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. utilities. Will the proposal result in: a. A need for new systems, or Substantial alterations to public utilities? —� — --L/-/ __ Slut City of Diamond Bar!nidal Studyekoe 5 Yes No Possibly 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result In: —� a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? / b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? V 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view offensive site open to he pubic' r will?the proposal result in / the creation of an aesthetically 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in: a. An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 2o. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result ►n: ✓ — a. The alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? physical or aesthetic effetructure or object? b. Adverse cts to a prehistoric or historic building, s c. A physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? — d. Restrictions on existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. Cf - .y of Diamond Bar Initial StudyF�e 6 Yes No Possibly 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance? a. Does the roposed project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantiallylreduce the at on to drop belowitat of a selffsustaining levels, thror wildlife eaten t eliminate or ause a fish or wildlife population reduce a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory . b. Does the proposed project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c. Does the pro sed project pose impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively —� considersb d. Does the project pose environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation: (Attach Narrative) iv. Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the pproppoosedprotect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ed project c I find that although the props have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this tra ed into because roe sed project.ation measures described on the attached sheet have been incorporated proposed A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. A�RlL �, — Signature: -i Date: �n, l Title: For the City of Diamond Bar, California ��' MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ZONE CHANGE CASE 90-0028 R-1 6000 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO C -1 -DP (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) EXPLANATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RESPONSES 1. Earth. (A,B C D,E,F,G) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The proposed zone change will not cause any changes to the geological substructures other physical features. 2. Air. (A,B,C) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the application, a zone change, there will be no adverse effect on air quality or ambient air emissions. 3. Water. (A,B, C,D,E,F,G,H,I) ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The zone change will not presently cause alterations to the site nor will the zone change alter current drainage patterns. 4. Plant Life. (A,B C,D,E) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The zone change will not alter the current plant life existing on the subject site. 5. Animal Life. (A,B,C,D) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The proposed application will not impact animal life. Due to the urban nature and previous development, no endangered animal or species are located on the site. 6. Noise. (A,B) ITEMS CHECKED "NO or POSSIBLY" The possibility of the zone change creating additional noise levels at this time is not foreseen but the probability in the future is high. 7. Light and Glare. ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The proposal at hand will not create additions to existing conditions although future development of the site may increase these conditions. 8. Land Use._ ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The proposed zone change is a substantial intensification of the present land uses. The zone change allows for the site to be developed to its highest and best use. 9. Natural Resources. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The proposal will not deplete any nonrenewable natural resources although electricity and water consumption may increase over present levels contingent upon the development. 10. Risk of Upset. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The application does not propose the use of any hazardous materials. 11. Population. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the proposal, little or no impacts to the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population are anticipated. 12. Housing. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No additional demands for the creation of new housing is anticipated. 13. Transportation/Circulation. (A,B,C,D,F) ITEMS CHECKED "YES AND POSSIBLY". The zone change proposed is likely to significantly increase the number of trips beyond the current levels, the need for parking onsite, the number of hazards present to motor, vehicle, and pedestrian traffic, and present patterns of circulation will be altered. 13. Transportation/Circulation. (E) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" There will no substantial negative impact to the existing traffic systems or to waterborne, air, or rail traffic. Instead, with the implementation of the mitigation techniques from an adjacent project, the existing traffic situation will maintain current levels of service or actually improve. 14. Public Services. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the proposal, the zone change will not interfere with the level of service maintained by the fire and sheriff departments, school or recreational facilities. 15. Energy. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The nature of the project is such that the demand for energy will not require the development of energy sources other than current sources. 16. Utilities. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No substantial alterations to existing utilities will be required to proceed with this proposal. 17. Human Health. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The scope of the proposal does not anticipate the use of any chemicals or equipment which might be injurious•tc the health and safety of residents or surrounding property owners. 18. Aesthetics. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The zone change will not obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public. 19. Recreation. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The proposal will not create the need for, or adversely affect existing recreational facilities. 20. Cultural Resources. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with zone change. MITIGATION MEASURES (TO BE PROVIDED FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-0036) Traf f is The traffic signal for State Route 60 off -ramp must be modified to provide a left turn phase for traffic turning onto the freeway and a right turn phase for traffic turning of the freeway, This improvement will provide for signal system operation and also improve the Level of Service to Level D. A third lane should be stripped southbound on Brea Canyon Road from the project entrance to the SR 60 ramp intersection. This lane would turn right onto the freeway westbound. The traffic sinal existing at Brea Canyon and Lycoming St. must be modified to provide left turn signals for northbound and southbound. The level of traffic forecasted for the site would still signal at the main access to allow require a traffic left turns onto Brea Canyon Rd. TO: 11 and associates, civil ineers, ince. 398 S. lemon Creak Drive, Suite E •Walnut. CaMomia 91789 •(714) 594'8702 (818) 331-8329 FAX (714) 594.2658 May 10, 1990 DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION VIA: DENNIS TARANGO, ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR RONALD L KRANZER, CITY/TRAFFIC ENGINEFROM: E� SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 90-0056 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89440 - THE H0SPRALTY CENTER, BREA CANYON ROAD AT ROUTE 60 FREEWAY Pursuant to a meeting held je 5-8-90 in he following observffice of the aanning Director and previous reviews Of tions o s andrecommendations are offered: the 'Traffic Study' forthe subject project ey Blvd. in the near future 1. The opening of GrandAvenueeduction i traffic onetween uts 60 and Brea Canyon) Rd. between the same limits. reult in a significant This reduction is estimated to be about the Same voQmtheeof increase nce eas including the subject with anticipated development of vacant prop lud should have a property. Therefore the mitigating measures proposed by this project lasting effect through build -out of the immediate area. 2. Reciprocal access with the property to the north with resulting access to Lycomi gStreet is highly desirable and to that end should be a requirement of this proposed development to provide the necessary elements to effect that access. 3. The proposed traffic signal at the entrance to the subject posed in an absolute s�ucy dated The alternate proposed in lieu of traffic signal asp p ro ect now identified. December, 1989, Page 17, is unacceptable for the scope of the p 1 Therefore if for some reason this proposed signal cin not be effected the approval of the project should be revisited. cient 4. The storm drain access easement access and should not be considered as an 3icent to the drainage channel is only of �nlate width to provide far emergency access. P.ECOMMENDA71ONS: The following recommendations are supplemental to those set forth in the Proposed System Improvements of the study' and addendum dated 413-90, and are attached and made a part hereof. 1. On site circulation and parking elements shall provide for a future reciprocal ingress egress to the property immediately north of the subject property and a formai deciamtion by the subject property owner shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. Page 2 Planning Commission ZC go-oo36 & CUP 89440 ' at Rte 60 Fwy Hospitality Center, Brea Cyn ce to the subject project. 2 Installation of a shallsignal on area bewithinCanyon Rod ata'systemathat ncludesn Said signal the existing traffic signals at the on and off ramps of Route 60 and Brea Canyon Road, Lycoming Street and Colima Road. 3. Modification of the existing signal system at the on and off ramps of Route 6o and Brea Canyon Road to provide left tum phasing and other elements required to achieve the necessary mitigation measures. This particular improvement will require approval from Caltrans and shall include provisions that Diamond Bar is consulted regarding any subsequent modifications to this signal system by Caltrans. 4. Upgrade the traffic signal system on Brea Canyon Rd. at Lycoming Street by providing left tum signals or phasing for both north and south bound Brea Canyon Road. on elements including the 5. possibility Brea CaYRhe existing left tum pocket od to achieve the required m orth'bound Brea Canyon Road passibility of extending at Route 60 on-ramp. RLK nb:2213:db-pc:hc3p'ty.cnt 02i02i!D0 15:19 $`714 594 2632 RKA and K Five _ t Y� 002 1 mmmoR.ANDUM DATE: January 12, 1.990 TO: ROBERT L VAN NORT. CITY MANAGER FROM: RONALD L. KRANZEA, CiTY ENGINESA SUBJECT: TFWFFIC STUDIES - BREA CANYON RD. BETWEEN RTE 60 FRET=WAY AND LYCOMiNG STREET 67440 Traffic impact Studies have been submitted for two projects on the east side of Brea Canyon Rd. within the subject limits, a hotel complex on the trailer sales parcel and a commercial office complex on the comer of Lycoming. These reports indicate that each project can deve!ope without Impacting the traffic flow on Brea Canyon Rd. Each project,of course, will have to incorporate traffic mitigating measures. In the case of the project on the comer of Lycoming only striping for channelization on both legs of Lycoming and some parking restrictions adjacent to the channelization is necessary. In the case of the hotel complex a traffic signal system midway between the Freeway and Lycoming is necessary and will have to be interconnected and coordinated with the other two signal systems. The significant aspect of traffic on Brea Canyon Rd. is that we can expect a decrease in volumes when Grand Ave. between the Freeway and Valley Blvd. is opened. This decrease in volume is estimated to be a push as to increases generated by future buildout of adlacent properties and hence the ability for Brea Canyon to accept future development without significant traffic impacts. In reviewing the report for the comer project I advisers the engineer and architect that the omission of the Grand Ave. opening should be corrected to better substantiate their report. I also advised representatives of each project that they should avail themselves of each others report and that they further explore the possibility of a mutual scuuss between both projec'.s as I feel each could benefit and it would certainly improve upon overall circulation. But I indicated that this was not an eggineering requirement. RLK7b:1919.db.'bnN1Cye.tlf cc: Matt Foratt RXA CIVIL ENGINEETZS 3913 Lemon Crootc Dr., Walnut CA (714) 594.9702 (utII) ?IIt•II3+3 n PROJ?Fer 8y o 74T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for the proposed RETAIL/OFFICE COMPLEX at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Diamond Bar, California Prepared for: G. MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. 721 South Brea Canyon Road, Suite 7 Walnut, California 91789 4 Prepared by: ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2540 Red Hill Avenue, Suite C Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 250-5525 �1/ August 30, 1989 �� �µ�'w���� TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RETAIL/OFFICE COMPLEX DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA Developer G. Miller Development Co. (714) 594-6966 Gary Miller Architect J.C. DABNEY and ASSOCIATES 721 South Brea Canyon Road, Suite 7 Walnut, California 91789 Traffic Analysis ASL Consulting Engineers 2540 Red Hill Avenue, Suite C Santa Ana, California 92705-5542 (714) 250-5525 Garold B. Adams - Project Manager Felicia A. Victor - Author, Analyst Reviewing Agency Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning 320 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 974-6461 Frank Kuo, AICP - Section Manager, Impact Analysis Section This report was prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers under the direct supervision of: l •k I > L""�"� Date Garold B. Adams, R.C.E., T.E. Associate ASL Job No. 1726.001 y! G7 ,� w N0. 1442 a Exp. 121311. 1 rRAF \1 J T 9TFUF CAL�F�1/ 41-%L'" TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STUDY PERSONNEL/SIGNATURE SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................ i LISTOF FIGURES .......................................... LIST OF TABLES ........................................... 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 1.1 Study Purpose ..................... 1 1.2 Project Location and Description ................... 1 1.3 Data Sources ....................................... 1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS.................................4 2.1 Existing Roadway Network 4 2.1.1 Lycoming Street ................................... 4 2.1.2 Brea Canyon Road .................................. 4 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Analysis .................. 6 3. FUTURE CONDITIONS ................................... 7 3.1 Background Traffic Growth ............. 7 3.1.1 Other Projects Traffic 7 3.2 Proposed Development Traffic 8 3.2.1 Trip Generation ................................... 8 3.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment .................. 9 4. IMPACT ANALYSIS ......................... 13 4.1 Background Traffic Analysis ..................... 13 4.2 Project Traffic Impact Analysis .................... 13 4.3 Site Access and Circulation ........................ 15 5. MITIGATION 15 5.1 Capacity Related Mitigation ........................ 15 6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... 16 APPENDIX - Tracs TM Computer Model Output ................ A-1 i LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1-1 Project Location .............................. 2 1-2 Site Plan ..................................... 3 2-1 Existing Conditions ........................... 5 3-1 Regional Distribution Patterns ................ 10 3-2 Project Traffic Intersection Assignment........ 11 3-3 Project Traffic Volumes P.M. Peak ............. 12 4-1 Background Plus Project Traffic P.M. Peak ..... 14 5-1 Proposed Striping for Lycoming ................ 18 ii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2-A ICU Values and LOS Designations .................. 6 2-B Current 1989 Conditions ICU and LOS Summary ...... 7 3-A Project Traffic Generation Summary ............... 8 4-A Background 1991 Conditions ICU and LOS Summary ... 13 4-B Background 1991 plus Project Traffic Conditions ICU and LOS Summary - Comparative Analysis ....... 15 iii 1. INTRODUCTION The services of ASL Consulting Engineers were retained by G. Miller Development Co. to conduct a Traffic Impact Study (or Site Impact Study ) for the proposed Retail/Office Complex in Diamond Bar, California. This report presents the study methodology, resulting findings and recommendations. 1.1 Study Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify significant traffic related impacts of the proposed development and, if possible, appropriate mitigation measures for those impacts. 1.2 Protect Location and Description The approximately 40,500 square foot development site is located in the City of Diamond Bar, in the southeast quadrant of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street intersection. Figure 1-1 illus- trates the project location -within the study area. The site is bounded to the north by Lycoming Street right-of-way, to the east by Los Angeles County Flood Control Channel, to the south by an undeveloped property, and to the west by Brea Canyon Road right- of-way. Access to the parking area and main entry is proposed from Lycom- ing Street. The conceptual site plan and access location is illustrated in Figure 1-2. As shown, the current proposal would entail the development of approximately 14,000 square feet of general office, and 7,000 square feet of retail space. 1.3 Data Sources Traffic Counts. Traffic Counts Incorporated, of Costa Mesa, California, provided both 24-hour "machine" counts and intersec- tion "hand" turning counts specifically for this study. Two-way, 24-hour counts were made on July 26, 1989 at two loca- tions: along Lycoming Street between Brea Canyon Road and Pine - falls Avenue, and along Brea Canyon Road between Lycoming Street and Interstate 60 Freeway. 1 p LEGEND 1 N.T. S. Intersections to be Analyzed ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga • Camarillo FIGURE I - I PROJECT LOCATION ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga • Camarillo `FIGURE 1-2 SITE PLAN A.M. and P.M. peak period turning movements were counted at four intersections: Lycoming Street/Brea Canyon Road; Brea Canyon Road/I-60 WB Ramps; Brea Canyon Road/Colima Road; and Colima Road/I-60 EB Ramps. Counts were made for 2 -hour a.m. peak period beginning at 7:00, and a 2 -hour p.m. peak period beginning at 4:00. Counts were made on,July 19, 20, and 25, 1989 at the four intersections listed above. Los Angeles County. Los Angeles County staff provided the fol- lowing data. 1. Information about planned roadway improvements, and planned developments in the vicinity. 2. Background traffic growth rate of 3 percent per year, compounded, for the period between 1989 and 1991, and 3 percent increase per year for peak hour turning move- ments. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS This section will describe the existing roadway network, daily and peak period traffic volumes, and traffic conditions in the area surrounding the proposed development. _The data collected is illustrated on Figure 2-1. 2.1 Existing Roadway Network Characteristics of the existing roadway network in the vicinity of the project are briefly discussed in the following sections: 2.1.1 Lycoming Street. Lycoming Street is an east -west collector road, has a pavement width of 40 feet, is striped for two traffic lanes (one lane each direction) plus parking on both sides, within 60 -foot of right-of-way. 2.1.2 Brea Canyon Road. Brea Canyon Road is a north -south major arterial, striped for four traffic lanes plus parking on both sides and painted median, within a 100 -foot right-of-way. Inter- section control on Brea Canyon Road from Lycoming Street to Colima Road is as follows: at Lycoming Street - a 2 -phase traffic signal; at SR 60 WB Ramps - a 2 -phase traffic signal; and at Colima Road - a 5 -phase traffic signal. Left turn phasing on Colima. 4 GI 44 LYCOMING G! PoM0"A FRWY. GOLIMA RC 67 LEGEND 10,700- EXISTING DAILY VOLUMES (2 -WAY) 4— 1,496- P.M. PEAK VOLUME 2 NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES r ;5 Utz) S144 GATEWAY I f 0 /NTERSEGT/Dill NUMBER N.T S. ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga 0 Camarillo FIGURE 2-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS (AUGUST 1988) 6 Z IL O Z W U J 67 LEGEND 10,700- EXISTING DAILY VOLUMES (2 -WAY) 4— 1,496- P.M. PEAK VOLUME 2 NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES r ;5 Utz) S144 GATEWAY I f 0 /NTERSEGT/Dill NUMBER N.T S. ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga 0 Camarillo FIGURE 2-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS (AUGUST 1988) 2.2 "Existing" Traffic Capacity Analysis The primary method of determining the traffic related impacts of the proposed project is to evaluate capacity utilization and level of service (LOS) at intersections. This calculation is done for three cases: (1) for existing conditions; (2) for conditions in the year the project is first expected to generate its full complement of traffic ("buildout" year) WITHOUT the project; and (3) for condition in the buildout year WITH the project. Existing conditions are analyzed primarily to establish a frame of reference and to identify current capacity constraints. Capacity and LOS calculations are limited to intersections (as opposed to roadway segments) because they are most often the con- straint to capacity. The case where this would not be true is on long stretches of open highway or on freeways. Capacity utilization and LOS are calculated using Critical Move- ment Analysis (CMA) as described in circular 212, Interim Materi- als on Highway Capacity, published the by Transportation Research Board (TRB), dated January, 1980. The CMA method identifies "a combination of lane volumes which must be accommodated in 1 hour through the middle of a signalized intersection. The sum of these volumes, termed the 'critical volume'... cannot exceed the saturation flow characteristics of the intersection." The analysis results in volumes (expressed as critical volume per lane) for Critical Movements on each street. The sum of these volumes is the Critical Volume. The Critical Volume is associated with a level of service (LOS). LOS ranges from "A" through "F" representing traffic quality; from optimal operating conditions with little or no delay to motorists (LOS A), to a condition where the arrival of vehicles exceeds the capacity of the intersection and motorists are faced within unacceptable delay in travel (LOS F). Table 2-A below shows the relationship between the Critical Volume and LOS. A Table 2-A Level of Service Ranges Planning Applications (in vph) Maximum Sun of Critical Volumes Level of Two Three Four or Service Phase Phase more Phases A 900 855 825 B 1050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 1100 D 1350 1275 1225 E 1500 1425 1375 F -------not applicable ------ The analysis also provides a volume to capacity (v/C) ratio for the intersection derived from the relationship of.critical vol- umes and lane capacity. Capacity, per lane, under ideal condi- tions is assumed to be the imperically derived value of 1,800 passenger cars per hour (pch). The value of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) is used in the analysis. The relationship between v/c ratios, LOS and "stopped delay" is shown in Table 2-B below. Table 2-B Delay and Level of Service Level of Service Typical v/c Ratio Delay Range (secs. per veh.) A 0.00-0.60 0.0-16.0 B 0.61-0.70 16.1-22.0 C 0.71-0.80 22.1-28.0 D 0.81-0.90 28.1-35.0 E 0.91-1.00 35.1-40.0 F varies 40.1 or greater a5topped delay Source: TRB Circular 212 Four Intersections were analyzed for potential impacts by the proposed development: 7 No. Intersection 1 Brea Cyn. Rd. at Lycoming 2 Brea Cyn. Rd. at SR -60 w/b Ramps 3 Brea Cyn. Rd. at Cotima Rd. 4 SR -60 e/b Ramps at Colima Rd. Table 2-C shows results of capacity analysis for 1989) condition. Capacity calculation worksheets the appendix. Table 2-C Existing 1989 Capacity Utilization and LOS existing (summer are provided in A.M. Peak Hr. P.M. Peak Hr. Location Brea Cyn. Rd. at Lycoming 0.38 (A) 0.61 (A) at SR -60 w/b 0.63 (A) 0.89 (D) at Colima 0.51 (A) 0.76 (C) SR -60 e/b at Colima 0.41 (A) 0.52 (A) County traffic analysis guidelines state that is considered acceptable. For most areas of the County, project traffic re- sulting in v/c less than 0.85 does not require mitigation (the exception is for urbanized areas where the threshold is IAS "D" or v/c = 0.90). Table 2-C shows that one intersection, Brea Canyon Rd. at the SR - 60 w/b ramps, is already experiencing capacity problems (v/c 0.89, LOS D) during the p.m. peak hour. All other intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS for both the a.m. and p.m. peaks. 3. FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Background Traffic Growth The traffic volumes on affected roadways have been growing stea- dily. Based the data supplied by LA County staff, growth has occurred at approximately 3 percent per year. Build -out of the office/retail development is anticipated to take two years to complete, therefore, a 6.1 percent increase (3 percent per year for two years, compounded) has been applied to the 1989 current traffic volumes to model 1991 "ambient" volumes. 8 3.1.1 Other Projects. Investigations about projects being ap- proved, construct, or under construction within one mile radius from the project site were conducted. To this date the data collected shows that there are no such projects. Traffic gener- ated from proposed projects outside the one mile radius is as- sumed to be included in the 3 percent per year growth. 3.2 Proposed Development Traffic In order to estimate project -related traffic volumes at specific locations, a three step process was utilized. First, the traffic generated by the proposed development was estimated. Second, the project traffic volumes were geographically distributed based on general knowledge of the area and local and regional attractors. Finally, these trips were assigned to specific roadways. 3.2.1 Trip Generation. The potential traffic generated by the proposed land uses was estimated by applying established ITE daily and peak hour trip generation rates to the planned land uses. Trip generation rates are expressed in terms of daily two- way and peak hour entering and exiting trip -ends per unit of land use. As Table 3-A shows, the proposed development is expected to generate 1,507 average weekday daily vehicle trips, 173 of which will occur during the average weekday evening peak hour. Tabte 3-A Traffic Generation Summary Retail/Office Complex 24 Hour Both Morning Peak Afternoon Peak LAND USES Directions Enter Exit Enter Exit Trip Veh. Trip Veh. Trip Veh. Trip Veh. Trip Veh. Rate Trip Rate Trip Rate Trip Rate Trip Rate Trip Retail 7,000 Sq.Ft. 166.35 1,165 2.41 17 1.98 14 9.00 63 9.80 69 Gen. office 14,000 Sq.Ft. 24.39 342 2.40 34 0.36 5 0.47 7 2.45 34 Total Vehicle Trips 1,507 50 19 TO 103 Source : Trip Rates - ITE "Trip Generation' 4th Edition Notes : Rates - Trip ends/1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area 2 3.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment. Traffic distribution is the determination of the directional orientation of traffic. It is based on the geographical location of employment centers, commercial centers, recreational areas or residential area con- centrations. Figure 3-1 illustrates the assumed regional distri- bution of project traffic, and it is based on the directional split of daily traffic volumes counted on Lycoming Street and Brea Canyon Road and the existing relationship between turning movements at key intersections. Traffic assignment is the determination of which specific route development traffic will use, once the generalized traffic dis- tribution is determined. The basic factors affecting selection for approaching and departing the site are the minimum time path and minimum distance path. Figure 3-2 illustrates the assignment of project traffic at area intersections by percentage of total project traffic. Based on the identified traffic generation and intersection assignment, p.m. peak hour project related traffic volumes were determined and are shown in Figure 3-3. 10 Ci W Z O l 9' } Z U Cr W J Q W � IM G2(W�o� " G3 (D °1o) LYCOMING G/ (/D%) _ SITE G4 ( LP- 5A� 3�� G 6(20`) z 09/0 PaMONA 65 (.5�� FRWY' 'o COL -IMA RD. G7(D�o) LEGES G = GATEWAY NUMBER ON�BBINJ ZE M PTACE NTS. ASL Consulting Engineers `FIGURE 3 -I REGIONAL Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS Rancho Cucamonga • Camarillo LYCOMiNG POMONA FRWY. C01_1MA RD. w LL W LEGEND QO% EXITING TRAFFIC 00% ENTERING TRAFFIC ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga 0 Camarillo FIGURE 3-2 PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION ASSIGNMENT LYCOMING POMONA PRWY. COLIMA RD - O U. w W J N LEGEND ♦ EXITING TRAFFIC ♦ 00 ENTERING TRAFFIC ASL Consulting Engineers Arcadia • Santa Ana • Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga • Camarillo N.T.S. FIGURE 3-3 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES P. M. PEAK HOUR 4. IMPACT ANALYSIS 4.1 Backaround Traffic Analysis Intersection capacity and LOS analysis was performed to evaluate the intersection operating conditions for the a.m..and p.m. peak periods for 1991 ambient traffic. Table 4-A shows the results of the analysis. Table 4-A Background 1991 Intersection Capacity and LOS Location Morning Afternoon (Bgn 7:30) (Bgn 5:00) Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street 0.39 (A) 0.64 (B) at SR 60 LB Ramps 0.6T (B) 0.95 (E) at Colima Road 0.56 (A) 0.81 (D) Colima Road at SR 60 EB Ramps 0.42 (A) 0.56 (8) Growth in ambient traffic between now -and 1991_is expected to adversely effect two intersections in particular. Brea Canyon at the SR -60 w/b ramps will go from v/c = 0.89 (LOS D) to v/c90 from95 (LOS E) in the p.m. peak and Brea Canyon atTheColima Colimawill intersec- v.c = 0.76 (LOS C) to v/c = 0.81 (LOS D). roach - tion remains in an acceptable LOS. The SR -60 ramps are approach- ing capacity. It appears as though additional capacity is needed at this intersection with or without the proposed project. The intersection operation could be best improved by providing an additional west -right lane. This improvement would result in a 1991 ambient v/c = 0.66 (LOS B). 4.2 Proiect Traffic Impact Analysis To determine the impacts that project traffic volumes are expect- ed to have on the build -out year traffic conditions, site -gener- ated traffic volumes were added to the background traffic vol- umes. Figure 4-1 shows 1991 "with project" turning volumes for the p.m. peak hour. Table 4-B shows "with project" v/c valves also tabulated foreasy Existing (1986) and 1991 (ambient) valves are comparison. 14 0 cr_ I Z U. Z V W J Q N W tr m a+ t 37 (G) N 32 (22) �o .j i x159 (97) LYCOMING '74 t74) �J 23,(Z3,) SITE ��r 921 (gpd) �NJ 3i6C31(o) �o �J PFswA t.420(390) �� Sirs r�(s95) L 4 4 ;��� rG�(r� dG3LgtGi COL►MA RD 902(902)-► LEGEND 181 (176) TOTAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC TRAFFIC N•T-S• FIGURE 4-1 ASL Consulting Engineers BACKGROUND PLUS Arcadia • santaAna • Palm Springs PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Rancho Cucamonga • Camarillo P M. PEAK HOUR Table 4-3 Intersection Capacity and Level OF Service Summarya Location 1989b 1991° 1991 (Existing Cond.) w/o Project w/Project AM PEAK HOUR Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming (1) 0.38 (A) 0.39 (A) 0.39 (A) at SR 60 WS (2) 0.63 (A) 0.67 (B) 0.68 (8) at Colima Rd. (3) 0.51 (A) 0.56 (A) 0.57 (A) SR 60 E/B 0.81 (D) 0.82 (D) SR 60 E/B at Colima Rd. (4) 0.41 (A) 0.42 (A) 0.42 (A) PM PEAK HOUR Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming (1) 0.61 (A) 0.64 (B) 0.69 (B) at SR 60 W/B (2) 0.89 (D) 0.95 (E) 0.97 (E) at Colima Rd. (3) 0.76 (C) 0.81 (D) 0.82 (D) SR 60 E/B at Colima Rd. (4) 0.52 (A) 0.56 (A) 0.56 (A) a intersection capacity determined using TRB Critical Movement Analysis per TRB circular 212, January 1980. b 1989 analysis based on vehicular turning counts made between July 19 and July 26, 1989. C 1991 "w/o Project" (background) volumes estimated_ using an assumed growth rate of 3% per year. Table 4-B shows relatively insignificant project impact at all four intersections. The project does not change LOS and v/c changes are less than or equal to 0.02 for intersections operat- ing over 0.80 (v/c increases of 0.2 or less are relatively insig- nificant relative to the accuracy of the method). 4.3 Site Access and Circulation The project site as currently planned, would have one single ac- cess driveway on Lycoming Street approximately 100 -foot east of Brea Canyon Road providing both right and left turn ingress and egress. 16 5. MITIGATION 5.1 Capacity Related Mitigation Because the project does not significantly impact capacity at the intersections analyzed, not project mitigation is recommended. Consideration should, however, be given to some improvements that would "mitigate" 1991 "ambient" conditions. The addition of a second west -right on the SR -60 w/b ramps would improve the p.m. v/c from 0.95 to 0.66. 5.2 Operations Mitigation To improve access to the proposed project and the existing landn use on the northeast corner of Brea Canyon and Lycoming, Lycoming should be restriped on the intersection approaches. Parking should be prohibited on the Lycoming west leg from about 435 feet from the intersection centerline. The approach should be striped with a 10 -foot wide, 150 -foot long, left turn pocket on centerline with a 60' reverse taper. The east leg of the intersection should be striped with a 50' long left turn pocket at Brea Canyon terminating in a two-way left turn lane. Parking should be prohibited in the two-way left turn lane section. The length of the two-way left turn section should be determined by County staff since parking elimination may adversely affect frontage properties east of the proposed project. The proposed striping is shown in Figure 5-1. 6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The impact of the proposed development on the study intersections is relatively insignificant. The following measures should be implemented as part of the proposed development. 1. Restripe Lycoming at the approaches to Brea Canyon Road to provide conventional left turn pockets at the inter- section and a two-way left turn lane for access to the project driveways. 2. Prohibit parking on Lycoming as necessary to provide striping described in Item 1 above, and to insure ade- quate sight distance from the project driveway. 17 APPENDIX APPENDIX A DKS TRACS COMPUTER MODEL OUTPUT Page 1989 AM Peak Hour Without Project .............. A-1 Intersection Geometrics Report ............. A-2 Input Volumes ...... ........ ............. A-3 Base Volumes by Turning Movement ........... A-4 Base Volumes - Approach and Departure ...... A-5 Intersection Capacity Calculation .......... A-6 Intersection1 ........................ A-6 Intersection2 ........................ A-7 Intersection 3 ........................ A-8 Intersection4 ........................ A-9 1991 AM Peak Hour Without Project ............... A-10 Base Volumes by Turning Movement ........... A-11 Base Volumes - Approach and Departure ...... A-12 Intersection Capacity Calculation .......... A-13 Intersection 1 ........................ A-13 Intersection 2 ........................ A-14 Intersection3 ........................ A-15 Intersection 4 ........................ A-16 1991 AM Peak With Proposed Project (No Mitigation) A-17 Trip Generation Report ..................... A-18 Gateway Percentages Report ................. A-19 Paths Report .............................. • A-20 Added volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-21 Added Volumes - Approach and Departure ..... A-22 Total Volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-23 Total Volumes - Approach and Departure ..... A-24 Intersection Capacity Calculation .......... A-25 Intersection1 ........................ A-25 Intersection 2 ........................ A-26 Intersection 3 ........................ A-27 Intersection4 ........................ A-28 1989 PM Peak Hour Analysis Without Project (Existing Conditions) .........................A-29 Base Volumes by Turning Movement ........... A-30 Base Volumes - Approach and Departure ...... A-31 Added Volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-32 Added Volumes - Approach and Departure ..... A-33 Total Volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-34 Total Volumes - Approach and Departure ..... A-35 Intersection Capacity Calculation .......... A-36 Intersection 1 ........................ A-36 CONT ID APPENDIX A Intersection2 ........................ A-37 Intersection 3 A-38 Intersection4 ........................ A-39 1991 Pm Peak Without Proposed Project ........... A-40 Base Volume by Turning Movement ............ A-41 Base Volumes - Approach and Departure ...... A-42 Intersection Capacity ...................... A-43 Intersection 1 A-43 Intersection 2 ........................ A-44 Intersection 3 ........................ A-45 Intersection4 ........................ A-46 1991 PM Peak With Proposed Project (No Mitigation) A-47 TripGeneration ............................ A-48 Gateway Percentages Report ................. A-49 Paths Report ..................... A-50 Added Volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-51 Added Volumes - Approach and Departure ..... A-52 Total Volumes by Turning Movement .......... A-53 Total Volumes - Approach and Departure A-54 Intersection Capacity Calculation .......... A-55 Intersection1 ........................ A-55 Intersection 2 A-56 Intersection3 ........................ A-57 Intersection4 ........................ A-58 Traffic Irapa:t Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Dimond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER89.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERAM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.INT GENERATION: MILLERAM.ZON GATENAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-1 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8123/89 16:21:3 > > < t DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DO KK KK SS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DO DD KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO DO KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO DD KK KK SS > < DO DO KK KK SS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK- SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < IT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < IT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < IT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < IT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < IT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > 11 \!\11111 \!\I \111\!1!11 \I \1111 /1111 \111111/11111111 \/\11111111 /\l\1111111111111 \111 \11111 COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER89.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERAM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.INT GENERATION: MILLERAM.ZON GATENAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-1 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8123/89 16:21:3 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:2113 INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS REPORT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INT L LT T RT R SG CAPY MING L LT T RT R SG CAPY MING L LT T RT R SG CAPY MING L LT T RT R- SG CAPY MING- CYCLE --------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------ ------------------------------------------ 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1600 . 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1600 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1600 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1600 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 1600 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 1600 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 1600 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1600 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1600 0' 0 ASL Consulting Engineers A-2 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8123/89 16:21:3 INPUT VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 Brea Canyon S Lycoming 233 1062 30 3 645 35 19 10 142 10 15 11 2 Brea Canyon 8 SR -60 W/B Ramps 184 701 0 0 670 122 0 0 0 206 0 496 3 Brea Canyon 3 Colima 127 192 42 138 323 443 262 215 114 9 324 220 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 423 0 34 170 292 0 0 439 302 ASL Consulting Engineers A-3 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diacond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1969 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:21:3 BASE VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BKGD INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT FACTR ------------------------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 0.38 A 233 1062 30 3 -------------------------------------- 645 35 19 10 142 10 15 11 1.00 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 N/B Rasps 0.63 B 184 701 0 0 670 122 0 0 0 206 0 496 1.00 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 0.51 A 127 192 42 138 323 443 262 215 114 9 324 220 1.00 4 BR -60 E/B Rasps & Colima 0.41 A 0 0 0 423 0 34 170 292 0 0 439 302 1.00 ASL Consulting Engineers A-4 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond ear, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:21:3 BASE VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE ASL Consulting Engineers A-5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 1325 797 2122 683 1092 1775 171 283 454 36 43 79 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 Y/B Rasps 885 876 1761 792 1197 1989 0 306 306 702 0 702 3 Brea Canyon & Colina 361 446 807 904 674 1578 591 894 1485 553 395 948 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0 0 0 457 472 929 462 473 935 741 715 1456 ASL Consulting Engineers A-5 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AN PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea.Canyon & Lycoeing TOTAL VOLUMES 35 645 3 A V A , 19 ----- 10 -----> <----- 142 ----- ----- Lycoming V V A 233 1062 30 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:21:3 A LANE CONFIGURATION U " 1 0 2 0 1 �A V V V A ----- ----- 11 i` i 0 0 p A 15 ' �'� 0 -----> <----- 0 10 1 -----> <----- 1 0 -----> <----- 0 V V ----- 0 V V SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST A A A 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1325 233 1600 1600 0.15 Southbound Through 683 322 1600 1600 0.20 Subtotal North-South 0.35 0.00 0.35 Lycoming Eastbound Left 171 19 1600 1600 0.01 00 Westbound Through 36 25 1600 1600 0.02 Subtotal East-West 0.03 0.00 0.03 •-•-2215 - -599 ----- TOTAL 0.38 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Consulting Engineers A-6 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon i SR -60 NIB Ramps 122 r r r A 0 ----- 0 -----> 0 ----- SR-60 W/8 Ramps V TOTAL VOLUMES 670 0 r � r r � r V A r A <--' '--> , , r r i i r 184 701 0 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:21:3 A LANE CONFIGURATION U 1 0 2 0 0 A V V V A 496 0 ----- ----- 1 r1� A A 0 0 -----> <----- 0 206 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 V V ----- 1 V V A A A 1 0 2 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ----------------------------- SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LAME TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ---------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 885 183 1600 1600 0.11 0 Southbound Through 792 335 1600 1600 0.21 Subtotal North-South 0.32 0.00 0.32 SR -60 W/B Rasps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 702 496 1600 1600 0.31 0 Subtotal East-West 0.31 0.00 0.31 ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --2379 1014 TOTAL 0.63 SERVICE LEVEL B ASL Consulting Engineers A-7 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon t Colima DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:21:3 TOTAL VOLUMES LANE CONFIGURATION 443 323 138 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 it A V A 220 i, i 2 ----- ----- 1 262 ----- ----- � 1 I A A 215 -----> <----- 324 'i �'i 0 -----> <----- 0 114 ----- ----- 9 2 -----> <----- 2 Colima V Y 0 -----> <----- 0 A V Y '--> 0 ----- l v y 127 192 42 A A A Brea Canyon 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2I2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW VIC GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO VIC RATIO (FT PER LANE) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 361 127 1600 1520 0.08 0 Southbound Right 904 303 1600 1520 0.20 0 Subtotal North-South 0.28 0.00 0.28 Colima Eastbound Left 591 144 1600 1520 0.09 0 Nestbound Right 553 220 1600 1520 0.14 0 Subtotal East-West 0.23 0.00 0.23 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- TOTAL 2409 794 0.51 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL consulting Engineers A-8 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 E/8 Ramps 6 Colima TOTAL VOLUMES 34 0 423 A V A 170 ----- ----- 292 -----> c----- 0 ----- ----- Colima Y V A 0 0 0 SR -60 E/B Ramps DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:21:3 /\ LANE CONFIGURATION " 0 0 0 1 1 " A V V V A f 302 ----- ----- 1 �\ A A 439 0 -----> <----- 0 0 2 -----> <----- 2 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 1 y - V A A A 0 0 0 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 0/3 1/1 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) SR -60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 Southbound All 457 250 1600 1600 0.16 Subtotal North-South 0.16 0.00 0.16 Colima Eastbound Left 462 170 1600 1600 0.11 0 Westbound Through 741 220 1600 1600 0.14 0 Subtotal East-West 0.25 0.00 0.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- TOTAL 1660 640 0.41 SERVICE LEVEL A Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers nn/vvv�/vu�/vvvvuv�/vvvv�/vvvuuvvvvvvvvv�/v�/vvvvvv� FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERAM.vOI < < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO DO KK KK SS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DD DO KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DO KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < OD DO KK KK SS > < DO DO KK KK SS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DODOODDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERAM.vOI 6EOMETRICS: MILLER89.IHT GENERATION: MILLERAM.ZON GATEWAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-10 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:18:1 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:18:1 BASE VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT -,.. .J«:.... C -..; ...e a A-11 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BKGD INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT FACTR - ----------------- --------------------------------------------------- 37 20 11 151 11 16 12 1. 06 1 Brea Canyon 6 Lycoming 0.39 A 247 1126 32 3 684 0 0 0 218 0 526 1.06 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 0.67 B 195 743 0 0 710 342 129 470 278 228 121 10 343 233 1.06 3 Brea Canyon E Colima 0.56 A 135 204 45 146 0 36 180 310 0 0 465 320 1.06 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 5 Colima 0.42 A 0 0 0 448 -,.. .J«:.... C -..; ...e a A-11 Traffic Impact Study - RetailJOffice Complex, DimOXS ASSOCIATESond Bar, California TRACS 4.2 1991 AN PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT 8/23/89 16:18:1 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers BASE VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ------------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycosing 1402 843 2245 723 1156 1879 . 180 298 478 36 44 80 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 WJB Ramps 938 928 1866 839 1268 2107 0 324 324 743 0 743 570 585 417 1002 Brea -Canon s & Colima & Colima380 470 850 484 500 957 7131984 489 501 670 624 9461990 785 757 1542 4 /yP Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming TOTAL VOLUMES 37 683 3 A 1 V A 20 ----- ----- 10 -----> <----- 150 ----- ----- Lycoming V V A 246 1125 31 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8123/89 16:18:1 /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 1 ii A V V V A ----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 10 1 -----> <----- 1 0 -----> <----- 0 Y V ---- 0 V V A A A 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) - --- --------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1402 246 1600 1600 0.15 Southbound Through 723 341 1600 1600 0.21 0 0.36 0.00 0.36 Subtotal North-South 0 Lycoming Eastbound Left 180 20 1600 1600 0.01 0.02 0 Westbound Through 36 25 1600 1b00 0.03 0.00 0.03 Subtotal East-West ------------------- -•-----=-- - 0.39 - -• :::::... 2341b32 TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL A Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Dimond Bar, California 1991 AN PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps TOTAL VOLUMES 129 710 0 A V A 0 ----- ----- 0 -----> (----- 0 ----- SR-60 W/8 Rasps V V A 195 143 0 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:18:1 /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 0 „ „ A V V V A 525 ----- ----- 1 A A 0 i 1i 0 -----> <----- 0 218 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 V V ----- 1 � - V A A A 1 0 2 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Left 938 195 1600 1600 0.12 Southbound Through 839 355 1600 1600 0.22 Subtotal North-South 0.34 0.00 0.34 SR -60 W/8 Rasps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 00 Westbound Right 743 525 1600 1600 0.33 Subtotal East-West 0.33 0.00 0.33 ------------2520 ----1075 ------------------- TOTAL 0.67 SERVICE LEVEL 8 a-14 __ Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima TOTAL VOLUMES LANE CONFIGURATION 469 342 146 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I i'1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I f I I I I 1 I I 1 A V A ;; A V V V A I 1 I 277 ----I ---- 233 2 ---- ---- 1 ' A A lil 227 -----) <----- 343 0 -----> <----- 0 120 ----- ----- 9 2 -----> <----- 2 Colima V V 0 -----> <----- 0 A V V 0 ----- ----- 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I V V I 1 I 134 203 44 A A A 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 Brea Canyon 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2/2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds OKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:18:1 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ------------------------------------------------------- -- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 381 134 1600 1520 0.09 0 Southbound Right 957 330 1600 1520 0.22 0 Subtotal North-South 0.31 0.00 0.31 Colima Eastbound Left 624 152 1600 1520 0.10 0 Westbound Right 585 233 1600 1520 0.15 0 Subtotal East-West 0.25 0.00 0.25 ------------------------- -------- -- -- TOTAL 2547 849 0.56 SERVICE LEVEL A .... - ---- --- - --- ._,C Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:18:1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Colima TOTAL VOLUMES /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 36 0 448 ;; 0 0 0 1 1 A V A ;; A V V V A 180 ----- ----- 320 1 ----- ----- 1 \ A A 309 -----> <----- 465 ; \�� 0 -----> <----- 0 0 ----- ----- 0 2 -----> <----- 2 Colima V V 0 -----> <----- 0 A V V <--, i '--) 0 ----- ----- 1 V V 0 0 0 A A A SR -60 E/B Ramps 0 0 0 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST SIGNAL CODE 0/3 1/1 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LAME PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - SR -60 E/e Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Southbound All 484 264 1600 1600 0.16 0 Subtotal North-South 0.16 0.00 0.16 Colima Eastbound Left 489 180 1600 1600 0.11 0 Westbound Through 785 232 1600 1600 0.14 0 Subtotal East-West 0.25 0.00 0.25 ----------------TOTAL----------------------1158------67b 0.41 SERVICE LEVEL A Ac, n -u Traffic Impact Study . Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PR0IECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers /vuvuvvuvvvvvvvvvvuuvuvvvu�/uvvvvvvvvvvvv�/vuvv� < > < ODDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDODDDDDDDD KK KK . SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DO KK KK SS > < DO DO KK KK SS > < DO DD KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > DC DD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DO DD KK KK , SS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR. RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PR0IECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERAM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.INT GENERATION: MILLERAM.IOH GATEWAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: - r.......J...... A-1% DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AN PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers TRIP GENERATION REPORT ZONE MANE 1 Retail 1 Gen. Office SUBTOTAL ZONE 1 TOTAL FOR ALL IONES UNITS TYPE RATE IN RATE OUT TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT TOTAL TRIPS ------ - --------------------- ----------------------------- 7.00 KSF Retail 2.41 1.98 17 14 31 14.00 KSF Office 2.40 0.36 34 5 39 50 19 69 -: ----- a-18 50 19 69 OKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 6/23/89 16:16:54 �..-- Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK NITN PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers GATEWAY PERCENTAGES REPORT IONE GATEWAYS 1 2 3 4 5 6 l 8 ----------- 1 10.0% 30.0% 0.0% 25.0% 5.0% 10.0% 0.0% 20.0% ASI Cnnsultina FnainPerc A-19 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:16:54 PATHS REPORT IONE GATE DIR 1 1 2WAY 1 2 2WAY 1 3 2WAY 1 4 OUT 1 4 IN 1 5 2WAY 1 6 2WAY 1 7 2WAY 1 8 OUT 1 8 IN 1WBT 1WBR 1WBL 2SBT 2WBR 1HBR 1WBL 2SBT 1WBL 2SBT 3SBR 4WBR 3S8L 3SBT 1WBL 2SBR 4SBL 3EBL 2HBT 1NBR ASL Consulting Engineers A-20 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:16:54 ADDED VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-21 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ----------- 1 Brea Canyon 6 ------------------------------------ Lycoming 0 0 30 15 0 0 0 5 0 11 2 6 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 0 18 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 Brea Canyon E Colima 0 5 0 1 2 5 10 0 0 0 0 3 4 SR -60 E/8 Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ASL Consulting Engineers A-21 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (n0 MITIGATION) 1RACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:16:54 ADDED VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE ASI rnncidtine FnninPnrc A-22 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 30 11 41 15 6 21 5 2 7 19 50 69 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/B Rasps 18 8 26 12 31 43 0 4 4 13 0 13 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 5 2 7 8 18 26 10 5 15 3 1 4 4 SR -60 E/B Rasps & Colima 0 0 0 10 5 15 0 0 0 5 10 15 ASI rnncidtine FnninPnrc A-22 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:16:54 TOTAL VOLUMES By TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-2-3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 0.39 A 246 1125 61 18 683 ------------------------------- 37 20 15 150 21 17 17 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/O Ramps 0.68 8 195 761 0 0 718 133 0 0 0 218 0 538 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima 0.57 A 134 208 44 147 344 474 287 227 120 9 343 236 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0.42 A 0 0 0 458 0 36 180 309 0 0 465 325 ASL Consulting Engineers A-2-3 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:16:54 TOTAL VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL -------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon 6 Lycoming 1432 854 2286 738 1162 1900 185 300 485 55 94 149 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 N/B Ramps 956 936 1892 851 1299 2150 0 328 328 756 0 756 3 Brea Canyon 8 Colima 386 473 859 965 731 1696 634 951 1585 588 418 1006 4 SR -60 E/8 Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 494 505 999 489 501 990 790 767 1557 ASL Consulting Engineers A-24 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGA14N) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea Canyon b Lycosing TOTAL VOLUMES 37 683 18 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 A V A I I 20 ----- ----- 15 -----> (----- 150 ----- ----- Lycoming V V A 1 i 1 I I I i 1 1 i 1 1 246 1125 61 Brea Canyon h LANE CONFIGURATION U " 1 0 2 0 1 II 11 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 A V V V A � I 17 i` i 0 ----- ----- 0 111 A A 1 I 17 0 -----> < ----- 0 21 1 -----> <----- 1 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 0 1 + Y V A A A I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I + 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------- SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds OKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1432 246 1600 1600 0.15 0 Southbound Through 738 341 1600 1600 0.21 0 Subtotal North-South 0.36 0.00 0.36 Lycooing Eastbound Left 185 20 1600 1600 0.01 0 Westbound Through 55 38 1600 1600 0.02 0 Subtotal East-West 0.03 0.00 0.03 TOTAL 2410 645 0.39 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Consulting Engineers A-25 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROSECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon SR -60 W/B Ramps TOTAL VOLUMES 133 718 0 r , A V A r , 0 ----- ----- 0 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- SR-60 W/B Ramps V V A r � , 195 761 0 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8123/89 16:16:54 /1 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 0 A V V V A , 0 ----- ----- l A A 0 0 -----> <----- 0 218 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 v v 0 ----- ----- 1 , V V SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST --------------------- SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds A A A 1 0 2 0 0 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 956 195 1600 1600 0.12 0 Southbound Through 851 359 1600 1600 0.22 0 Subtotal North-South 0.34 0.00 0.34 SR -60 W/B Ramps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 756 538 1600 1600 0.34 0 Subtotal East-West 0.34 0.00 0.34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 2563 1092 0.6B SERVICE LEVEL B ASL Consulting Engineers A-26 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Cffice Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AN PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 TOTAL VOLUMES A LANE CONFIGURATION U 474 344 147 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 A V A ;; A V V V A 287 ----- ----- 236 i1 i 2 --- ----- 1 1� A A 227 -----> <----- 343 i 0 -----> <----- 0 120 ----- ----- 9 2 -----> <----- 2 Colima V V 0 -----> <----- 0 A V V ----- ----- 1 V V 134 208 44 A A A Brea Canyon 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2/2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Left 386 134 1600 1520 0.09 0 Southbound Right 965 330 1600 1520 0.22 0 Subtotal North-South 0.31 0.00 0.31 Colima Eastbound Left 634 158 1600 1520 0.10 0 Westbound Right 588 236 1600 1520 0.16 0 Subtotal East-West 0.26 0.00 0.26 TOTAL 2573 858 0.57 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Lonsultina Engineers A-27 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 AM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps i Colima 3 , A 180 ----- 309 -----> 0 ----- Colima V TOTAL VOLUMES 6 0 458 V A SR -60 E/B Ramps /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 0 0 0 1 1 A V V V 325----- �1A 465 i `'i 0 -----) 0 2 -----> 0 -----> V 0 ----- V - A A A 0 0 0 0 0 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 A SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ---------------------- SIGNAL CODE 0/3 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ----------------- SR-60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Southbound All 494 270 1600 1600 0.17 0 Subtotal North-South 0.17 0.00 0.17 Colima Eastbound Left 489 180 1600 1600 0.11 0 Westbound Through 790 232 1600 1600 0.14 0 Subtotal East-West 0.25 0.00 0.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 1773 682 0.42 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Consultina Enaineers A-28 A 0 0 0 SR -60 E/B Ramps /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 0 0 0 1 1 A V V V 325----- �1A 465 i `'i 0 -----) 0 2 -----> 0 -----> V 0 ----- V - A A A 0 0 0 0 0 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:16:54 A SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ---------------------- SIGNAL CODE 0/3 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C GIC CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ----------------- SR-60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Southbound All 494 270 1600 1600 0.17 0 Subtotal North-South 0.17 0.00 0.17 Colima Eastbound Left 489 180 1600 1600 0.11 0 Westbound Through 790 232 1600 1600 0.14 0 Subtotal East-West 0.25 0.00 0.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 1773 682 0.42 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Consultina Enaineers A-28 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retailloffice Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers l\11111 \I \1111111111 /1111111111 \l1l \1111111 \1111111 \11111111111 \11111111111111111 \1 \111111 < > < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD OD KK KK SS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < OD DD KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD OD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DO KK KK SS > < OD DO KK KK SS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK' SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > <11 > \1111111111 /\111111111 \IV 11 \11111 1111 \111111 !11 \l\1 \l\11111111111 1111 \111 \1111111111111 COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER89.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERPM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.IHT GENERATION: MILLERPM.ZOH GATEWAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-29 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:23:8 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 BASE VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT •ci r . d ►:.. [....:..mac A-30 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IBKGD INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT FACTR ------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon i Lycoming 0.61 B 233 1496 109 --------------------------------------- 26 783 43 70 29 218 92 21 6 1.00 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/8 Ramps 0.89 D 148 974 0 0 861 135 0 0 0 299 0 853 1.00 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima 0.76 C 175 392 328 263 340 395 424 1006 148 102 279 166 1.00 4 SR -60 E/B Rasps & Colima 0.52 A 0 0 0 700 0 46 151 851 0 0 562 368 1.00 •ci r . d ►:.. [....:..mac A-30 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 BASE VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE ASL Consulting Engineers A-31 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 1838 1093 2931 852 1572 2424 317 297 614 119 164 283 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 1122 1160 2282 996 1827 2823 0 283 283 1152 0 1152 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima 895 590 1485 998 982 1980 1578 849 2427 547 1597 2144 4 SR -60 E/8 Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 746 519 1265 1002 608 1610 930 1551 2481 ASL Consulting Engineers A-31 Traffic impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDI11ON) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 ADDED VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT act rn—il rinn Fnnineerc A-32 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT -------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Brea Canyon Q Colima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 act rn—il rinn Fnnineerc A-32 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DXS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 ADDED VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ------------------------------------ --------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/B Ramps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 SR -60 E/B Rasps & Colima 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACI r—'dfinn Fnninoorc A-33 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California OKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 TOTAL VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT -- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT Canyon6 ------------------------------------------------ Lycoming 0.61 8 233 1496 109 26 783 43 70 29 218 92 21 6 1 Brea 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/O Ramps 0.89 D 148 974 0 0 861 135 0 0 0 299 0 853 3 Brea Canyon S Colima 0.76 C 175 392 328 263 340 395 424 1006 148 102 279 166 368 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0.52 A 0 0 0 700 0 46 151 851 0 0 562 1--: ----- A-34 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 TOTAL VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 1838 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1093 2931 852 1572 2424 317 297 614 119 164 283 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/8 Ramps 1122 1160 2282 996 1827 2823 0 283 283 1152 0 1152 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 895 590 1485 998 982 1980 1578 849 2427 547 1597 2144 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0 0 0 746 519 1265 1002 608 1610 930 1551 2481 Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea Canyon i Lycoming DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:23:8 ASI Cnncultine Fn insure A_ZA TOTAL VOLUMES A LANE CONFIGURATION 43 783 26 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 I I I li 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 11 11 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I <--1 I-- A V A ;; A V V V A 70 ----- ----- 6 1 1 A A 29 -----> <----- 21 0 -----> <----- 0 218 ----- ----- 92 1 -----> <----- 1 Lycoming V Y 0 -----> <----- 0 A V V ---- ---- 1 I 1 I 1 1 i 1 I V V 233 1496 109 A A A I 1 i I 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 Brea Canyon 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION ------------------------------------------------ NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Through 1838 748 1600 1600 0.47 0 Southbound Left 852 26 1600 1600 0.02 0 Subtotal North-South 0.49 0.00 0.49 Lycoming Eastbound Through 317 99 1600 1600 0.06 0 Westbound Left 119 92 1600 1600 0.06 0 Subtotal East-West 0.12 0.00 0.12 TOTAL 3126 965 ---- --------------------- 0.61 SERVICE LEVEL B ASI Cnncultine Fn insure A_ZA Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/B Ramps TOTAL VOLUMES 135 861 0 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 A V A I I I 0 ----- ----- 0 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- I , SR -60 W/8 Ramps V V A _I I I-- <- I I 1 > 1 � I I 1 1 148 974 0 Brea Canyon LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 0 11 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I ( I I 11 I 1 I 1 1 ii A V V V A 853 0 ----- ----- 1 A A 0 �I; 0 -----> <----- 0 299 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 1 V V A A A I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 t I 1 0 2 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:23:8 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) - ----- ------------------------------ Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1122 148 1600 1600 0.09 0 Southbound Through 996 431 1600 1600 0.27 0 Subtotal North-South 0.36 0.00 0.36 SR -60 W/B Ramps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 1152 853 1600 1600 0.53 0 Subtotal East-West 0.53 0.00 0.53 - ----------- ---- --- -------------- TOTAL 3270 1432 0.89 SERVICE LEVEL D Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 16:23:8 INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima TOTAL VOLUMES /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 395 340 263 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 1 I 1 11 1 I i 1 1 1 1 I I? I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 11 I I I 1 1 A V A ;; A V V v A 424 1 ----- 166 i\ i 2 I ' A A 1 I 1006 -----> <----- 279 i \; 0 -----> <----- 0 148 ----- ----- 102 2 -----> <----- 2 Colima V V 0 -----> <----- 0 A V V 0 ----- ----- 1 I I I 1 I I I I I V V 175 392 328 A A A I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 Brea Canyon 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2/2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE). Brea Canyon Northbound Through 895 219 1600 1520 0.14 0 Southbound Left 998 263 1600 1520 0.17 0 Subtotal North-South 0.31 0.00 0.31 Colima Eastbound Right 1578 577 1600 1520 0.38 0 Westbound Left 547 102 1600 1520 0.07 0 Subtotal East-West 0.45 0.00 0.45 TOTAL 4018 1161 0.76 SERVICE LEVEL C Traffic Impact Analysis - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1989 PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (EXISTING CONDITION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 EA Ramps & Colima TOTAL VOLUMES 46 0 700 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I A V A I 151----�---- 851 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- 1 , Colima V V A I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 0 0 0 SR -60 E18Ramps LANE CONFIGURATION 0 0 0 1 1 t l I 1 1 I I T I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1-- 11 A V V V A I 1 I I 368 1 ----- ----- 1 A A I I 562 i 1i 0 -----> <----- 0 0 2 -----> <----- 2 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 1 1 I V V A A A 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 0 0 0 0 0 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 16:23:8 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 0/3 1/1 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) SR -60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Southbound All 746 407 1600 1600 0.25 0 Subtotal North-South 0.25 0.00 0.25 Colima Eastbound Left 1002 151 1600 1600 0.09 0 Westbound Through 930 281 1600 1600 0.18 0 Subtotal East-West 0.27 0.00 0.17 TOTAL 2678 839 - 0.52 SERVICE LEVEL A ASL Consulting Engineers A-39 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PH PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:34:32 n/vvuvvvvvvvv�/uvvvvvuvv�/vvuvuv�/uvuvvuvv�/vvvvv� COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: a Number of Intersections: 4 < DDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDODDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DO DD KK KK SS > < DD DD KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DO KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DD DD KK KK SS > < DDDDODDDDDOD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDODDODDODD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > �/vv`/vvvuvu�/vvvvuvu�/vv�nn/vvvvvvv�/vvvvv�/uvvvvvv COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: 1 MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: a Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERPM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.INT GENERATION: MILLERPM.ZON GATEWAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-40 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:34:32 BASE VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASI rnncultinn Fnninsnrc A -Ll NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BKGD INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT FACTR -1 Brea Canyon 6-Lycoming 0.65 B 247 1586 116 28 830 46 74 31 231 98 22 6 1.06 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 0.94 E 157 1032 0 0 913 143 0 0 0 311 0 904 1.06 3 Brea Canyon 8 Colima 0.81 D 185 416 348 279 360 419 449 1066 157 108 296 176 1.06 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Cclima 0.56 A 0 0 0 742 0 49 160 902 0 0 596 390 1.06 ASI rnncultinn Fnninsnrc A -Ll Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:34:32 BASE VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE ASL Consulting Engineers A-42 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL 1 Brea Canyon d Lycoming 1946 1157 3103 901 1665 2566 335 313 648 125 172 297 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/B Ramps 1188 1228 2416 1055 1936 2991 0 299 299 1220 0 1220 3 Brea Canyon b Colima 947 624 1571 1056 1039 2095 1671 898 2569 578 1691 2269 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Colima 0 0 0 789 550 1339 1062 643 1705 985 1643 2628 ASL Consulting Engineers A-42 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming A 74 ----- 30 -----> 2331 ----- Lycoming V 45 TOTAL VOLUMES 829 27 V 1 A A i 246 1585 115 Brea Canyon SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds OKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Through 1946 792 1600 1600 0.49 SJ 0 Southbound Left 901 27 1600 1600 0.02 0 Subtotal North-South 0.51 0.00 0.51101 Lycoming Eastbound Through 335 104 1600 1600 0.06 0 Westbound Left 125 97 1600 1600 0.06 0 Subtotal East-West 0.12 0.00 0.12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 3307 1020 0.63 1� SERVICE LEVEL 8 ASL Consulting Engineers A-43 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 1 " 1 A V V V A 6 i1 i 0 ----- ----- 0 A A 22 i ,i 0 -----> <----- 0 97 1 -----> <----- 1 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 0 V V A A A 1 0 1 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds OKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Through 1946 792 1600 1600 0.49 SJ 0 Southbound Left 901 27 1600 1600 0.02 0 Subtotal North-South 0.51 0.00 0.51101 Lycoming Eastbound Through 335 104 1600 1600 0.06 0 Westbound Left 125 97 1600 1600 0.06 0 Subtotal East-West 0.12 0.00 0.12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 3307 1020 0.63 1� SERVICE LEVEL 8 ASL Consulting Engineers A-43 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon Q SR -60 W/B Rasps TOTAL VOLUMES 143 912 0 A V A ----- ' 0 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- SR-60 W/B Ramps V V A 156 1032 0 Brea Canyon SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1188 156 1600 1600 0.10 `" ; 0 Southbound Through 1055 456 1600 1600 0.28 t°- 0 Subtotal North-South 0.38 0.00 0.38 5 SR -60 W/B Ramps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 1220 904 1600 1600 0.56 .SeS 0 Subtotal East-West 0.56 0.00 0.56fjj' TOTAL 3463 1516 0.94 SERVICE LEVEL E ASL Consultina Enaineers A-44 LANE CONFIGURATION " „ 1 0 2 0 0 A V V V A 904 i, i 0 ----- ----- 1 A A 0 i ,i 0 -----> <----- 0 316 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 1 V V A A A 1 0 2 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1188 156 1600 1600 0.10 `" ; 0 Southbound Through 1055 456 1600 1600 0.28 t°- 0 Subtotal North-South 0.38 0.00 0.38 5 SR -60 W/B Ramps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 1220 904 1600 1600 0.56 .SeS 0 Subtotal East-West 0.56 0.00 0.56fjj' TOTAL 3463 1516 0.94 SERVICE LEVEL E ASL Consultina Enaineers A-44 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar,.California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon & Colima TOTAL VOLUMES /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 418 360 278 ;; 1 0 2 0 1 r r I 1't I 1 I r I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I t l 1 I I 1 1 I -- A V A A V V V r I I I I 1 4 ----- ----- 115 ;\ ; 2 ----- '�' A 1 1 1066 -----> (----- 295 ; \; 0 -----> 156 ----- ----- 108 2 -----> 1 Colima V V 0 -----> R V r I I 1 I 1 1 r - 185 415 347 A A A I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I Brea Canyon ; 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/NEST ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2/2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds A A <----- 0 <----- 1 <----- 0 V ----- 1 V DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Right 947 239 1600 1520 0.16 0 Southbound Left 1056 278 1600 1520 0.18 0 Subtotal North-South 0.34 0.00 0.34 Colima Eastbound Right 1671 611 1600 1520 0.40 0 Westbound Left 578 108 1600 1520 0.07 0 Subtotal East-West 0.47 0.00 0.473 TOTAL 4252 1236 0.817'Z� SERVICE LEVEL D ASL Consulting Engineers A-45 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps 6 Colima TOTAL VOLUMES 48 0 741 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 A V A 1 I 160 --------- 902 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- Colima V V A _I I 1-- (- 1 1 1 > I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 0 0 0 SR -60 E/8. Ramps /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 0 0 0 1 1 11- 11 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I! 11 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 11 1 1 1 I 1 A V V V A 1 ! 390 ;\ 1 1 1 ----- ----- 1 A A 595 0 -----> <----- 0 0 2 -----> <----- 2 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- i I V V A A A I 1 I I ! I I I 1 t I I I I I I 1 ! I 1 1 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:34:32 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 0/3 1/1 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SR-60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Southbound All 789 431 1600 1600 0.27 0 Subtotal North-South 0.27 0.00 0.27 Colima Eastbound Left 1062 160 1600 1600 0.10 0 Westbound Through 985 297 1600 1600 0.19 0 Subtotal East-West 0.29 0.00 0.29 TOTAL 2836 888 0.56 SERVICE LEVEL A AQI rnncnlfinn Cnn;Hoare 6-L/. Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers nnnnnn/�/vu�/vvvvv�n/�/vvvuvu�n/vvvvvuuvvvuvu�/vuvv� COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: i MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 < DODDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO DD KK KK SS > < DO DD KK KK SS > < DD DD KKKKKKKK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO DO KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < DO - DO KK KK SS > < DD DD KK KK , SS > < DDDDDDDDDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSSS > < DOODDODDDDD KK KK SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TTTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RRRRRRRRRRR AA AA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AAAAAAAAAAAA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CC SS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSSS > < TT RR RR AA AA CCCCCCCCCCC SSSSSSSSSSS > vin/vuvinn/v�/vvvvvvuvvvv�/vvvvvvvvvvvv�nn/vvvv�nn/ COPYRIGHT DKS ASSOCIATES, 1986 VERSION 4.2 6-17-87 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers PARAMETERS: FILE NAMES: Number of Zones: i MASTER FILE: MILLER9I.PRM Number of Gatesways: 8 Number of Intersections: 4 BASE VOLUMES: MILLERPM.VOL GEOMETRICS: MILLER89.INT GENERATION: MILLERPM.ZOM GATEWAY: MILLER.GAT PATHS: MILLER.PTH COMMENTS: ASL Consulting Engineers A-47 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers TRIP GENERATION REPORT ZONE NAME UNITS TYPE RATE IN RATE OUT TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT TOTAL TRIPS 1 Retail 7.00 KSF Retail 9.00 9.80 63 69 132 1 Gen. Office 14.00 KSF Office 0.47 2.45 7 34 41 SUBTOTAL ZONE 1 70 103 172 TOTAL FOR ALL ZONES Act c....;--- - A -LA 70 103 172 DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers GATEWAY PERCENTAGES REPORT ZONE GATEWAYS. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 10.0% 30.0% 0.0% 25.0% 5.0% 10.0% 0.0% 20.0% ASL Consulting Engineers A-49 US ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Offics Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:37:53 PATHS REPORT ZONE GATE DIR 1 1 2WAY 1WBT 1 2 2WAY 1NBR 1 3 2WAY 1 4 OUT 1WBL 2SBT 3SBR 4WBR 1 4 IN 2WBR 1NBR 1 5 2WAY 1WBL 2SBT 3SBL 1 6 2WAY 1WBL 2SBT 3SBT 1 7 2WAY 1 8 OUT 1WBL 2SBR 1 8 IN 4SBL 3EBL 2NBT 1NBR ASL Consulting Engineers A-50 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:37:53 ADDED VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-51 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 Brea Canyon 3 Lycooing 0 0 42 21 0 0 0 7 0 62 10 31 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 W/O Ramps 0 24 0 0 41 21 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima 0 7 0 5 10 26 14 0 0 0 0 3 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps i Colima 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ASL Consulting Engineers A-51 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK 6ITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:37:53 ADDED VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ------------ 1 Brea Canyon 6 Lycosing 42 62 104 21 31 52 7 10 17 103 70 173 2 Brea Canyon i SR -60 W/B Ramps 24 41 65 62 41 103 0 21 21 17 0 17 3 Brea Canyon 6 Colima 7 10 17 41 24 65 14 26 40 3 5 8 4 SR -60 EJB Ramps & Colima 0 0 0 14 26 40 0 0 0 26 14 40 ASL Consulting Engineers A-52 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DES ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:37:53 TOTAL VOLUMES BY TURNING MOVEMENT ASL Consulting Engineers A-53 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION V/C LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT -------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 0.69 B 246 1585 157 48 829 45 --------- 74 37 231 159 32 37 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 NIB Ramps 0.98 E 156 1056 0 0 953 164 0 0 0 316 0 921 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 0.82 D 185 422 347 283 370 444 463 1066 156 108 295 178 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0.56 A 0 0 0 755 0 48 160 902 0 0 595 416 ASL Consulting Engineers A-53 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California DKS ASSOCIATES 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) TRACS 4.2 Prepared 6y ASL Consulting Engineers 8/23/89 15:37:53 TOTAL VOLUMES - APPROACH AND DEPARTURE ASL Consulting Engineers A-54 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEG LEG LEG LEG INTERSECTION ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL ENTER LEAVE TOTAL 1 Brea Canyon & Lycoming 1988 1219 3207 922 1696 2618 342 323 665 228 242 470 2 Brea Canyon & SR -60 W/B Ramps 1212 1269 2481 1117 1977 3094 0 320 320 1237 0 1237 3 Brea Canyon & Colima 954 634 1588 1097 1063 2160 1685 924 2609 581 1696 2277 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps & Colima 0 0 0 803 576 1379 1062 643 1705 1011 1657 2668 ASL Consulting Engineers A-54 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED. PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 1 Brea Canyon 6 Lycoming TOTAL VOLUMES 45 829 48 A V A 74 ----I ----- 37 -----> <----- 231 ----- ----- Lycoming V V A 246 1585 157 Brea Canyon /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 1 A V V V A ----- 0 A A 32 ; \ 0 -----> <----- 0 159 1 -----> c----- 1 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ---- ----- 0 , V V A A A 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL CODE 1/1 4/4 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ---------------------------------------------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Through 1988 792 1600 1600 0.49 0 Southbound Left 922 48 1600 1600 0.03 0 Subtotal North-South 0.52 0.00 0.525o Lycoming Eastbound Through 342 111 1600 1600 0.07 0 Westbound Left 128 159 1600 1600 0.10 go 0 Subtotal East-West 0.17 0.00 -0717- TOTAL 3480 1110 0.69 3'3 SERVICE LEVEL 8 ASL Consulting Engineers A-55 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond ear, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED. PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 2 Brea Canyon 6 SR -60 N/8 Rasps TOTAL VOLUMES 164 953 0 I � � , 1 , I 1 A V A , I ---, 0 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- I I SR -60 W/8 Ramps V V A � I I , I , 1 , I I , I 156 1056 0 Brea Canyon A LANE CONFIGURATION U 1 0 2 0 0 A V V V A 921 0 ----- ----- 1 I , I A A 0I I , 0 -----) <----- 0 316 0 -----> <----- 0 0 -----> <----- 0 Y V 0 ----- ----- 1 V V A A A I 1 I 0 1 I I 2 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 SIGNAL CODE 1/1 0/1 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ----------------------------------- ------------------- Brea Canyon Northbound Left 1212 156 1600 1600 0.10 ,^G 0 Southbound Through 1117 476 1600 1600 0.30 0 Subtotal North-South 0.40 0.00 -0-.40- SR-60 W/O Rasps Eastbound Left 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 0 Westbound Right 1237 921 1600 1600 0.58 tr 0 Subtotal East-West 0.58 0.00 4 -:58 - TOTAL 3566 1553 -0-:98 0.0�1 ) SERVICE LEVEL E ASL Consulting Engineers A-56 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complax, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PdOPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 3 Brea Canyon 3 Colina TOTAL VOLUMES 444 370 283 A V A 463 ----- ----- 1066 -----> <----- 156 ----- ----- Colima V V A 185 422 347 Brea Canyon DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 /\ LANE CONFIGURATION 1 0 2 0 1 „ > A V V V A 178 i\ i 2 ----- ----- 1 \ A A 295 \; 0 -----> <----- 0 108 2 -----> <----- 2 0 -----> <----- 0 V V 0 ----- ----- 1 , V V SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST A A A 1 0 2 0 1 SIGNAL CODE 1/1 2/2 SIGNAL TYPE Single Phase Protected Left MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) Brea Canyon Northbound Right - 954 239 1600 1520 0.16 Southbound Left 1097 283 1600 1520 0.19 3 0 Subtotal North-South 0.35 0.00 445 - Colima Eastbound Right 1685 611 1600 1520 0.40 0 Westbound Left 581 108 1600 1520 0.07 0 Subtotal East -Nest 0.47 0.00 0.47 ? C ------------------- ------------- TOTAL 4317 1241 -0.82-,f)I b SERVICE LEVEL D ASL Consulting Engineers A-57 Traffic Impact Study - Retail/Office Complex, Diamond Bar, California 1991 PM PEAK WITH PROPOSED PROJECT (NO MITIGATION) Prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION INTERSECTION 4 SR -60 E/B Ramps Colima TOTAL VOLUMES 48 0 755 A V A 160----- 902 -----> <----- 0 ----- ----- Colima V V A 0 0 0 SR -60 E/B Ramps A LANE CONFIGURATION U 0 0 0 1 1 A V V V 416 i1 1 ----t + A 595 0 -----> 0 2 -----> 0 -----> V 0 ----- V A A A 0 0 0 0 0 SIGNAL OPERATION NORTH/SOUTH EAST/WEST -------------------------------- SIGNAL CODE 0/3 1/1 SIGNAL TYPE Split Phase Single Phase MINIMUM GREEN 0 Seconds 0 Seconds CYCLE LENGTH 0 Seconds DKS ASSOCIATES TRACS 4.2 8/23/89 15:37:53 A V CAPACITY MINIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL CRITICAL BASIC ADJUSTED TRAFFIC GREEN LEFT TURN CRITICAL APPROACH VOLUME CAPACITY FOR YELLOW V/C G/C CRITICAL LANE LENGTH STREET DIRECTION MOVEMENT VOLUME PER LANE PER LANE TIME LOSS RATIO RATIO V/C RATIO (FT PER LANE) ----------------- ------------- - --- SR -60 E/B Ramps Northbound None 0 0 1600 1600 0.00 00 Southbound All 803 439 1600 1600 0.21 Subtotal North-South 0.27 0.00 0.27 Colima Eastbound Left 1062 160 1600 1600 0.10 0 Westbound Through ' 1011 297 1600 1600 0.19 0 Subtotal East-West 0.29 0.00 0.29 ------------------------------------------------896---------------------...... --------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 2816 0.56 SERVICE LEVEL A RECEIVED DIAMO;N'D BAt; INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM C! TY C! Frl{ TO: Lynda Burgess, City Clerk FROM: Phyllis Papen, Councilwoman SUBJECT: Appeal Planning Commission DATE: May 17, 1990 Pursuant to direction from the City Attorney it is requested that you schedule, for the June 5th City Council session, an appeal of the Planning Commission action taken at their May 14th meeting. Specifically, it is requested that the following two items be con- sidered by the City Council, without prejudice for their review, concurrence or action as necessary: Appeal of Resolution Number 90.7 Marriott Conditional Use Permit 1,I19 Appeal of Resolution Number 90.8 Diamond Bar Honda Conditional Use Permit These appeals are based upon concerns regarding signage approved as part of the above referenced conditional use. In closing, please notify the applicants that these items have been appealed to the City Council and that the matter will be heard June 5, 1990. Sincerely, �n�1•y: Phyllis Papen Councilwoman PP:ps May 29, 1990 Mr. Dennis Tarango City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 190 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Re: Planning Commission Hearing Walnut Valley Trailer Site - 5-14-90 Dear Dennis: P,cCtiv LL) GV�PIOP;G BAR CITY CLERK Via FAX (714) 860-7427 Cahan/Crisell Properties would like to appeal only the decision reached on building signage on the project referenced above. We would like to submit the original signage program to City Council. Very truly yours, Rob Cahan Gene Partner /rpd P0. Box 2099, Escondido, CA 92025 (619) 741-9801 FAX; (619) 741-0578 AGENDA NO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE: MAY 29, 1990 MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Dennis A. Tarango, Acting Planning Director BY: Rob Searcy, Assitant Planning Director SUBJECT: Environmental Determination, Zone Chanqe 90-0036, and an Appeal or Conditional Use Permit 89440, the development of a multiple tenant commercial center providing retail, hotel, restaurant and fast food services totaling 78,715 square feet on 7.54 acres of land, two freestanding signs in excess of 35', three 9' monument signs, and a 4' directional sign located on a site on the east side of Brea Canyon Road between Interstate 60 and Lycoming Road. RECOMMENDED ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: _ 1. Approve Environmental Determination for Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. Approval of Zone Change from M -1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing) to C -1 -DP (Restricted Commercial). 3. Adoption of Ordinance 90 -XX -(1990) in support thereof. 4. Appeal of the Conditional Use Permit 89440 to allow freestanding signs in excess of 6'. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: -------------------------------------------- -------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant II F. Signage: Total Type Height Sq. Ft. Monument Signs 9' 324 Pad "A -C" (3) Directional Sign 3"-9" 15 Freeway Signs 39' 525 Total 864 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing a mixed use commercial project which includes a 135 room Fairfield Inn Hotel, two retail buildings, a fast food restaurant, and a family dining restaurant, totaling 78,715 square feet. The building lot coverage is approximately 24 percent, landscaping 17 percent, driveway aisles and parking approximately 50 percent and open space comprises the remaining 9 percent. There is one point of access to the project site via Brea Canyon Road. There are six (6) signs proposed; two 42 foot freeway oriented signs, three monument signs along Brea Canyon Rd., and a hotel directional sign at the center entrance. The center is proposing hours of operation to extend from 6:00 a. m. to 1:00 a. m. daily for the restaurant and retail uses and 24 hour operation for the hotel. Thirty- five employees per each of three shifts are anticipated on site at this time. B. Issues: The primary issues related to developing this project with these uses at this location are internal and external use compatibility, parking, traffic, and signage. The following sections address and discuss these issues: 1. Compatibility of Uses: The project's mix of commercial uses are complimentary to each other and offer a balanced choice of retailing. The project development is not too intensive or dense for the site and provides a reasonable buffer separating the freeway from the residential development to the north. 3 This project is separated from the residential development by an 8'-6" garden wall (per resident and staff concerns), landscaping, and a 40' wide Flood Control Channel. The portion of the project developed nearest to the residential units is the site of the 15,000 square foot retail structure. The rear of this building abuts the Flood Channel and adds an additional buffer between the internal project uses and the residential development. The landscaping provided will additionally act to impede sound and light spillage and to impair visual access between sites. 2. Availability of Parking: The parking provided for this project exceeds current City standards by over 10 percent (see parking calculations). The standard to compact parking size distribution must be a 60 to 40 percent mix. 3. Traffic Issues: The Traffic Report initially prepared addressed traffic generated for a more intensive development. The present project will be less intensive with only one fast food restaurant. The addition of a family restaurant and 6,000 square feet of retail space replaces two fast food uses, thus further reducing traffic generation. The Traffic Report identifies, mitigation measures to ease negative impacts. A. The interconnection or phasing of the proposed signal at the project entrance and three existing signals, located from Brea Canyon Road north to Lycoming Road, will allow for the increase in traffic flow. According to the City Engineer and Lt. Luter of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, this interconnecting of lights may increase post - project traffic flow conditions to more favorable conditions than currently exist. B. There will be a third turn lane from the project entrance to the 60 freeway constructed to allow for right turns onto the freeway westbound. C. The signals located at Brea Canyon and Lycoming Street must be mod f i ed to al 1 ow for 1 eft turns northbound and southbound. 4 D. The traffic signal located at SR 60 Freeway must be modified to allow left hand turns onto the freeway and right hand turns off the freeway. The Report addresses the current and planned development of the area surrounding the project. The study analyzed traffic generation with the development of the site to the north as a commercial site. The Report was conservative and did not calculate the , positive effects on existing conditions on Brea Canyon Road produced by the Grand Avenue opening scheduled for early 1991. 4. Signage Issues: The center proposes six signs. There are two freeway oriented freestanding signs and four monument signs. The freeway signs are for the Fairfield Inn and Knollwood Restaurant, and both signs are located along the freeway off -ramp to the south of the property. The four monument signs are positioned along Brea Canyon Road. The hotel, both restaurants, and the small retail pad will be represented by these monument signs. The monument sign for the hotel is a directional information sign which identifies the hotel location to southbound traffic. Freeway oriented signage along the off ramp is a great concern for safety and aesthetic reasons. Staff feels that two freeway oriented signs as requested for one project is not desirable. Staff recommends that the Fairfield Inn freestanding sign not be approved. Instead, a wall sign on the eastern elevation should be considered as a feasible alternative. The other freeway oriented pole sign as requested will provide adequate and reasonable exposure for the center. Internal signage will conform to the center standards established to reflect existing City Ordinance requirements. 5. The staff and applicant have met to review materials which will be integrated into the design of the project. A blue tile inlay will be used to accent the off-white stucco exterior and the blue standing seam metal roof. A white accent striping will be used under the arches to compliment the Frazee paint. 5 on review of C , Environmental Assessment: pie initial study, traffic was identified as the major environmental concern. A traffic study was completed and the report reviewed by Staff. Staff have found no substantial environmental conditions that cannot be defused by traffic mitigation measures. III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must makeallthe following findings in order to approve this app i. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists within such area. 2. The proposed zone change and Conditional Use Permit is in accordance with the General usePl an g w being developed, the surrounding n and the highest and best use of the land. 3. The proposed use will not we be de r i mental tor matei al l y the public health, safety injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. as a ublic IV. CORRESPONDENCE: �n1SGitm abriel aVabeen ad�ebunee and Progress Hearing in the S .Bulletin. : commends approval of Zone Change V. RECOMMENDATIONStaff re 89440, Conditional Use Permit 90-0036, and Environmenta Declaration Determination of mitigated ion ofApprovals through the adoption of the attached Resolut RS:tb M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89440 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT "A" 1. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "permittee" shall include the applicant and any other person, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. 2. This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and the owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed at the City of Diamond Bar Planning Department their affidavit stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. 3. This grant will expire unless used within one (1) year from the date of approval. A time extension of up to one year may be requested before the expiration date. 4. The subject property shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statue, ordinance or other regulations applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. 5. This grant allows for the development of a commercial project of approximately 78,715 square feet on a 7.53 acre site. The approved uses composing this development are as follows: a) Fairfield Inn. A 38 foot, three story, 135 room hotel with parking in excess of 135 spaces. No assembly areas, restaurant, nightclub or live entertainment is allowed as part of this permit. Total square footage of 49,915 square feet. b) Family Restaurant. A 5,000 square foot, 200 seat restaurant offering outdoor dining. No live entertainment is approved as a part of the permit. Parking provided is in excess of the 73 required. c) Fast Food Restaurant with drive-through service. This 2,800 square foot unit is approved for a seating capacity of 70 persons. The parking exceeds the required standard. Outside speaker volumes must not exceed 20 decibels. d) Retail Uses. Two units not to exceed 32 feet in height with square footage totalling 21,000 square feet. Parking provided is in excess of required standard. 6. Parking for the project shall not be less than 323 spaces. Standard size parking stalls shall be no less than 60 percent of total and handicapped parking will be provided at one per 40 spaces. 7. The hours of operation will be from 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. for all uses with the exception of the hotel which will operate on a 24 hour period. 8. All wall and monument signs shall conform to C-1 zone requirements as well as the center sign pl4n. Monument signs identified as pad A,B and pad C are approved and the directional sign for the hotel is approved for a height not to exceed 42". The freeway oriented pole sign for the center is approved but can not exceed 40 feet above grade. No other signs are approved as part of this approval. 9. Three (3) copies of the site plan and landscape plan as approved by the Planning Commission at the public hearing and conforming to such conditions that can be shown on a plan, shall be submitted for approval of the Director of Planning. 10. The permittee shall contact the Fire prevention Bureau of the Los Angeles County Forester and Fire Warden to determine what facilities may be necessary to protect the property from fire hazard. Any necessary facilities shall be provided as may be required by said department. 11. All structures shall conform with the requirements of the Department of Building and Safety. 12. The project must be developed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer including traffic mitigation conditions stipulated in the revised traffic report. a. The traffic signal for State Route 60 off -ramp must be modified to provide a left turn phase for traffic turning onto the freeway and a right turn phase for traffic turning off the freeway. This improvement will provide for signal system operation and also improve the Level of Service to level D. b. A third lane should be stripped southbound on Brea Canyon Road from the project entrance to the SR 60 ramp intersection. This lane would turn right onto the freeway westbound. c. The traffic signal existing at Brea Canyon and Lycoming St. must be modified to provide left turn signals for northbound and southbound. d. The level of traffic forecasted for the site would still require a traffic signal at the main access to allow left turns onto Brea Canyon St. RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.90-0036 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.89440 TO MODIFY A M -1 -DP -BE ZONE DESIGNATION TO A C -1 -DP ZONE AND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HOTEL, MIXED RETAIL, TWO RESTAURANTS, AND THREE FREESTANDING SIGNS OVER SIX (6) FEET TALL ON A 7.54 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT BREA CANYON ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 60 FREEWAY, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Cahan/Crisell Properties on behalf of Louis Marcellin, Walnut, California, has heretofore filed an application for approval of a Zone Change No.90-0036 and Conditional Use Permit No.89440 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit are referred to as "the application". (ii) On May 14, 1990 the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of facts set forth in the Recitals, Part. A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on May 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at Brea Canyon Road and the SR 60 Freeway with a gross area of 7.54 acres and is currently developed with a recreational vehicle sales and storage facility; and (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are developed with single family and multiple family residences and also an AM/PM Mini Mart, located to the south of the site lies the SR 60 Freeway, the property to the east is residential and is developed with single family residences, and the properties to the west are developed with single family residential homes and a day care center; and (c) The subject property consists of a recreational vehicle sales and storage facility and is surrounded by commercial and high density residential land uses; and (d) The site is sufficient in size and can provide adequate ingress and egress to allow commercial development in character with surrounding current land uses; and (e) Hours of operation are proposed to be from 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. with the exception of the hotel which will remain open 24 hours daily; and (f) There is adequate space to provide all the parking necessary based on gross floor area. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced May 14, 1990 public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed application is in accord with the proposed General Plan, the objectives of the Community Plan and is compatible with land uses surrounding said site. (b) That the proposed application, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the application complies with all applicable provisions of the City Planning and Zoning Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration with conditions. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following restrictions as to use and standard conditions attached to this document and marked Exhibit "A" as referenced here: Planning Division Conditions: 1) This approval shall apply to the Zone Change No. 90-0036 for approval of a C -1 -DP zone designation, restricted commercial development with a development program, and Conditional Use Permit No. 89440 for development of a 135 room hotel, 21,000 square feet of retail space, two restaurants totaling 7,800 square, and for six freestanding signs (four monument signs not in excess of six feet in height and two pole signs not to exceed 39 feet above grade). A. The hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. for the general center with the exception of the hotel which will provide 24 hour operation. B. Outside speaker volumes shall be modulated so as to be inaudible beyond the property line. C. Landscaping must be approved by the Director of Parks and Maintenance and shall be maintained by applicant. 2) The C -1 -DP zone designation shall run permanently with the title of said real property or until such time the Commission approves a change. The Conditional Use Permit approval will expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within twelve (12) months from the date of approval. 3) Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, and the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services regulations have been complied with. 4) The signage within the center shall conform to the signage plan developed for the center and additionally must meet all City codes in effect at the time installation. All proposed signs must be submitted to the City Planning Department for approval. 5) Parking and landscaping must be provided as approved and shall be in compliance with City require- ments. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY: ATTEST: David Schey, Chairman Dennis A. Tarango, Secretary I, Dennis Tarango, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: [COMMISSIONERS:] NOES: [COMMISSIONERS:] ABSENT: [COMMISSIONERS:] j=x ") I D i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, HEREIN DESCRIBED, FROM THE M -1 -DP -BE (LIGHT MANUFACTURING -DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM -BILLBOARD EXCLUSION) ZONE TO THE C1 -DP (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL -DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) ZONE. (ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-0036).- A . 0-0036). A. Recitals. (i) Cahan/Crisell Properties have heretofore filed an application to amend the official zoning map of the City of Diamond Bar, reclassifying certain real property, described as Los Angeles County Assessor Parcel No. 8719-13-07 and generally located on the east side of Brea Canyon Road between Interstate 60 and Lycoming Road. ("Said real property" hereinafter in this Ordinance). Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein, -is a proposed official zoning map amending the official zoning map of the City of Diamond Bar by reclassifying said real property from Light Manufacturing (M -1 -DP -BE) to Restricted Commercial Development Program (C1 -DP) zone, as proposed by the applicant. i) On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized Municipal Corporation of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 57376, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 11 thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code (as subsequently amended by Ordinance Nos. 15 and 15A of the City of Diamond Bar) contains the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles, now currently applicable to development applications (including the subject application) within the City of Diamond Bar. (iv) On April 23, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the subject application and concluded said hearing on June 5, 1990. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65360, this City Council finds and determines that: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the reclassification of said real property to the land use requested in the application will be consistent with the General Plan proposal which is to be studied and adopted by the City Council, within a reasonable time; (b) There is a substantial probability that the reclassification of said real property, as proposed by the application, will not be a substantial detriment to, nor interfere with, the future adopted General Plan for the area of the subject real property; (c) The site of the proposed reclassification, as set forth in the application, is suitable for any of the land uses permitted within the proposed zone district; and (d) The proposed reclassification as set forth in the application is reasonable and beneficial at this time, and, further, said reclassification will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding properties. Section 3. The City Council hereby finds that a negative declaration has been prepared with respect to the project identified in this Resolution and, further, that said negative declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder. Further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said negative declaration. Section 4. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth hereinbelow, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project, no significant environmental effects will occur. 0 Section 5. The City Council finds that the facts supporting the above specified findings are set forth in the negative declaration, the staff report and exhibits appended thereto, and the information provided to this City Council during the public hearing conducted with respect to the project and the negative declaration. Section 6. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Diamond Bar hereby is amended to reclassify that certain real property, hereinabove described, from the M1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing -Development - Program -Billboard Exclusion) zone to the C1 -DP (Restricted Commercial -Development Program) zone, all as set forth in the Official Zoning Map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1990. I, , City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the - day of , 1990, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar. Harmony & Associates A PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMPANY Publishers of THE HARMONY REPORT post Office Box 4153, 14139 Afamado Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 "' (714) 8M. -W3, FAX (714) 861.8881 DATES May 10, 1990 ATTENTIONt Dennis Tarrango., Planning Director gROM: Clair Wm. Harmony SUBJECT: Traffic Memo Please include this for Monday's Planning Commission Agenda Package. Include it ae a cover to they Traffic Engineer's Report. Also, I plan to recommend extension of the Brea Canyon southbound left turn lana at Colima (See drawing). NUMBER OF MES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: k,,,_ IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED CALL (714) 860-3463 FACSIMILE (FAX) NUMBER (714) 8614UI Harmony & Associates A PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMPANY Publishers of THE HARMONY REPORT Post office Box 4153, 24139 Afamado Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 "* (714) 860-3463, FAX (114) 861-BMI MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission AGENCY: CM OF DIAMOND BAR FROM: Clan' Wm. Harmony, Vice Chairman SUBJE(."1: Fairfield Hotel Traffic Mitigation.+ / Honda TTOMIC / Lemon Motel DATE: May 10,19% Additional Traffic Mitigations are outlined in the City Engineer's Report to the Planning Commission. The engineer and two members of his Traffic committee are to be commended for working out these controls. The Traffic Committee did not receive a complete Traffic Report on the Honda Dealership expansion, per the Planning Commission's directions. They only received the amended up -date. To that end, during their regular meeting May 3, they have asked the following: MOTIOK 6 "That the City Councii and Planning Commission provide us with the direct opportunity to have the Diamond Bar Honda Project, the Colima and Lemon Motel Project, and the Brea Canyon and Lycoming Project come before us at the next meeting." CONCLUSIONL As evidenced by their contributions to the Fairfield project, we should take advantage of their offer -- espe- cially for projects which have significant impacts. 'jay 10 -90 15:54 KIMLEY—HORN/ORANGE t 1 i' i ch 1." 0 FAX 714938948E F. 1 r� rrr. A99,077- No i -, - X I I (-) I; � Department of Regional Planning ZONING AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATION As required by Chapters 22.16 22.56 & 21.40 of the Los Angeles County Code The following information is necessary for the review of ALL applications. Failure to furnish information will delay action. Attach extra sheets if necessary. Please read instructions carefully. RECORD OWNER(S) APPLICANT APPLICANT'S AGENT (Engineer, Licensed Surveyor, Other and please indicate if engineer is also an Attn: Ken Spear agent) Louis Marcel Cahan/Crisell Properties Name Name Name Address 20326 Fuerte Dr, Address 362 W. Mission Ave., 0105 Address City Walnut, CA City Escondido, CA City — Zip 91789 Phone) 71A 595-8154 Zip 92025 Phone (6191741-9801 Zip Phone ( ) (Attach separate $eet if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corAhtions.) CONSENTAx6ns4nt 3p the submission of this request. Signed �' �" Date / (All record o ers) CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. i / — Signed 1-11 or Applicant's Agent) Date c, F►? G Location Brea Canyon Road (East side of street) (Street address or distance from nearest cross street) between Interstate 60 and Lvcowina (Street) (Street) in Zone MIDPBE (Land Use, not postal zone) Zoned District San Jose HNM/FS 111 H333 CSI TBG 97 D2 Assessor 8719 CT 4033.12 Planning Area East San Gabriel USGS tan nimac_ Contract City Diamond Bar Supervisorial District 1 General Plan Category Industrial Local Plan Category (if applicable) None Local Plan N/A Project Size (gross acres) 7.54 acres Project Density Previous Cases ZC 5775; ZC 6131; CUP 909;CUP 86334; CUP 88087 Present Use of Site R -Y. sales lot Domestic Water Source Walnut Valley Water Dist. CompanyiDistrict Method of Sewage Disposal sanitary serer Sanitation District L-A- County Giading of Lots by Applicant? Yes X No_. Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project) It petitioning for tone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to the change. Lot 79 of TR 33069 as recorded In wap Book 924 pages 1 through 7 official records of "finty of Los Angeles, State of California. APPROPRIATE BURDENS OF PROOF MUST ACCOMPANY EACH TYPE OF REQUEST — Check each request applied for and complete appropriate sections. PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST Countywide/local Plan or Area Plan Land Use Map Change: From To Acres From To Acres Other Countywide (Gen. Dev., Housing & Spec. Mgmt.) Map Change: From To Acres From To Acres Identify Text Change(s) to Countywide! Local or Area Plan Desired: Total Project Units Currently Allowed By: la) CW Plan (b) Local Plan Total Project Units Permitted If: (a) CW Plan Amended Ib) Local Plan Amended Total Acres Involved: la► (b) SERVICES: Existing and Proposed: Gas & Electric Education Fire Access Sheriff ❑X ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Zone: From Acres To Acres 'I. s V `1- e'- V M 1 (DP) (BE) 666 C ; MIR) 1w) WS111, ID CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, NONCONFORMING REVIEW, AND OTHER PERMITS Permit Type conditional Use Permit Ord. No. '�e10� �' Y0 X36 '1.sy Project Site: 1111V" 5 Area devoted to: structures open space Gross Area No, of Lots e`7 ° (i S )�) Residential Project and Proposed density Gross Area No. of floors Units/Acres Assembly and Dining Uses: (Occupant load for buildings per Building & Safety) Non Residential Parking: Type Required Provided Total Required: ` Total Provided: ' f Additional Information: The following must be completed for HOUSING PERMITS: Units allowed without bonus: Units Density Bonus Required: % Units Total Units including bonus: Units X SUBDIVISION REQUEST TOTAL GROSS ACRES TENTATIVE MAP NUMBER LOTS: Existing one Proposed 5 STAGE: T X RV _ AM _ RN_ RA_ FN WR MAP: T X RR(FD) RRILD) RV_ AO_ LL VESTING: (Y) (N) LOT TYPE;OWN'SHIP (Circle) -.NO. LOTS;NO. UNITS;AC LOT TYPE OWN'SHIP (Circle) NO. LOTS NO. UNITS ACRES SF MH I NC CC L DUP I NC CC L MF I NC CC L OS I NC CC L R PF 1 NC CC L of NC CC L 5 6.54 I 1NC CCL STAFF PURPOSES ONLY Sch. Dist(s) UN HS LS SCM Date Cities: LA_BH_LC_PM_Other Counties: LA—VT—SB—OR— K— Other Agencies/Companies: MWP_DWP_CWP_SCE_SCG_,PT,_GT_ATS_SPT_UPR_MSHC_SCRC ANG_PNF_ Other CALTRANS: Y_N_Neme(s). PCH_ TCR— DCR_Other Route(s): HIGHWAYS M ISC.: PROJECT NO.: CASES: PLAN AMENDMENT HOUSING PERMIT OTHER FILED ZONE CHANGE PARKING PERMIT PARCEL MAP FEE No. Brown Line cup. OAK TREE No. Blue Line RECEIPT NO. VARIANCE TRACT No. Brown Line NON CONFORMING REVIEW No. Blue Line In addition to the info satisfaction of the Zoning Boarc A. That the 1. f r 2. E 3. ti 21 3; B. That 1 walls, featur said u'. rmation required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the I and/or Commission, the following facts: requested use at the location proposed will not: kdversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or 3e materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of )ther persons located in the vicinity of the site, or Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. The proposed uses will definitely be a benefit to the persons residing and working io the area as their daily needs for food, lodging, and genera the development will actually be able to walk to the project because of i The uses are oonsldered to service •basic needs -0 andXL11-021— create any unusual circumstances or demands that would negatively impact nelghborin4 r t or le. 1 As a quality development sarving the dally and basic needs of the com- munity. there is no danger to the health, safety, or general welfare of *he pash! he proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development as prescribed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate ;e with the uses in the surrounding area. The development Is self contained In the sense of satisfying all on::s to reaulrements of title 22 and all other addltionaL._rso YAMW+- �w'e .. ._.— _.___,..,. ..—twl Anvlrnru nt. C. That the proposed site is adequately served: .,f e..ffiriont Wirith and imoroved as necessary to In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the satisfaction of the Commission the following facts. Answers must be made complete and full: A. Modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning plan as it pertains to the area or district under consideration because: The subject property Is located contiguous to a freeway off ramp and single-family residential (separated by a flood control channel). All other properties at the intersection of the Brea Canyon off ramp and the freeway are commercially oriented, i.e., gas stations, restaurants, and fast foods. The saes fTy� o��kh�-k[4QSCtl�a-a�f[�YaK Off—ralnng#ba�=60_, freeway corridor within 7 miles of the subject property. This Is reflective of the service nature Of prgmrtiggmtlglllu"l)_fronvay._Qf.f_rM"rQughout_southern_CaU#ocnta.—Oa-tha— other hand, industrially zoned properties typically are not located adjacent to residential and adjoining freeway off ramps due to incompatabtllty with r_esidenti_al uses and the access problems for trucking associated with high traffic areas. B. A need for the proposed zone classification exists within such area or district because: The ideal buffer to residential uses is retalI commercial development due to the "clean' nature of the typical uses, I.e., the absence of offensive aspects associated with industrial users. Such negative aspects Include emission of foul odors, unsightly storage, and loud noises at all hours of the day and night. Good planning dictates a more transitional buffer from a freeway and entrance to a residential area, whtch_with the present zone classification Is not guaranteed. Therefore, the need far a commercial zone classification is greatly needed within this district at this site. C. The particular property under consideration is a proper location for said zone classification within such area of district because: As stated In B above, this particular property Is upAuely positioned at the convergence of -a retailing sector and a residential sector. Although there does exist soma IIght manufacturing in the general vicinity, this property Is Isolated by the freeway and flood channel and on busy residential feeder street. Therefore, the sensitivity to both the residents living in the area, as well as servicing motorists off the freeway, should balance In considering a proper zone classification. Clearly a retail commercial zone classification addresses this sensitivity with none ofthe negative aspects of the industrial zoning D. Placement of the proposed zone at such location will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare, and in conformity with good zoning practice because: First of all, the proposed commercial zoning best satisfies the conformity with good zoning practice because It (1) allows for uses that viii service and benefit existing traffic already CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT ZONING CASE NO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I '✓E �� declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to Section 2015.5 of the Ca of Civil Procedure, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owning property within a distance of five hundred (500) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Lot 79 of TR 33069 as recorded in map Book 924 pages i through 7, official records of County of Los Angeles, State of California. Executed at .-�`c �t� ,i �CCalifornia, this day of 3/64 Si 19�� INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE COUNTY OF IAS ANGELES A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): Cahan/Cr I se I I Properties (varie 362 Y. Mission Avenue, Suite 105 — Address Escondido, CA 92025 -- _--- — -- (619) 741-9801_ __ _ — ---- -- ---- — -----� Phone Plumber Phone Number Rezone E C.U.P. for proposed mixed use commercialial project 1. Action requested and project description: 7-Vf on fsalli1 acres including hotel, fast food and retail shop space. 2. Street location of project: Brea Canyon Rd., north of I-60, south of Lycoming. - ---___ 3a. Present use of site: R.Y. saies"storage - —_ 3b. Previous use of site or structures: unknown (STAFF USE) PROJECT NMSER(s) 2F� no fq yy� Project Representative: Kenneth S. Spear _ _ Name -- Address 4. Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: — — _----- - 5. Other related permit/approvals required. Specify type and granting agency. ---- 6. Are you planning future _ phases of this project? /Y/ /N/ If yes 7. Project area: Covered by structures, paving: Landscaping, open space: Total area: IC. !dater and sewer service: ibes service exist 3t site? ---' ----- 3 stories - hotel 8. N- unoer of f loons: 1 story - fast food, retail shops 9. Present zoning: M 1 (oP) (cc) ------ If yes, do purveyors have capacity to .,.ieet Jan.--in-3 of project and all other approved projects? If domestic water or public sewars are not 3vsi l3bl- now will these 0-e-; ,or idec3' Domestic Public !Fhper_ Sewers /N/ /Y/ /N/ A7' /Y/ /97 yes.'e � ov -------------------------------- - 1 - Residential projects: 11. Nuri.,-)er and ty;y� of units: _------------____-- ---------------- ----------------------- 12. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? ------- - Are existing school facilities adequate to meet.project needs? /Y/ /N/ If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? ---------- Non-Residential projects: 13. Distance to nearest residential use or 651 across flood control channel sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) ____— ------ 14. Nurioer and floor area of buildings: 5 buildings totaling �7.70o sq- ff___ — --- lo ees and shi fts: 15. Nuriaer of er,�p y 17. operating hours: 16. Maximum employees per shift: r _ y 16. Identify any: End products Waite products means of disposal bstances such as oil, pesticides, 19. Do project operations use, store or paoduceTnaz�% /�/ If yes, explain: _— chemicals, prints, or radioactive materials. 20. Do your operations require any pressurized tanks. /Y% /N/ If yes, explain: 21. Identify any flarunaale, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. 22. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through If yes, explain: residential areas to reach the nearest highway./ - 2 - B. ENVIROM ENTAL INFORMAT1 1, Environmental Setting -- Project Site a, Existing use/Structur,,S R.V.-sales and storage- _hoae_and_setal bui Iding_of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ approximately 2,000 sq. ft. -__---- •-------------- - ------ - ----------------- b. Topugrap:)y,'slopes Level- ------------------- ---------- ---------------- �n `I -r„5�<<z`:+Y11--------- *-----.-_-------- - - c. Vegetation -------- ------ ------ *d. Animals _ ------------------- -------------------- *e, Watercourses ��r = -- --------------------------------- - f. Cultural/historical resources _wove ____—__--__—__------------ — - g. Other — _ _ ---- ---- ---- -------------- 2. Environmental Setting -- Surrounding Area North. Single family residential dwelling; a. Existing uses/'structures (types, densities) : __----------------- South: 1-60 off ramp; East; Flood control channel; Hest: __—_____--_----------- b. Topography/S100es General lir level. Slope from freeway off ramp rade down to sub iectp_r°tx-W-0-- -------------------- *c. Vegetation — *d. Aminal s r.. � �=� — ----- --- ------ ---- *e. Watercourse � r ,vim; r-��,.,a� '•:,��1;,vU1 .;��-,?,=-,�� �--------------------- f. Cultural/historical resources None ---- --- — g. Other — -- ----- 3. Are there any major trees on and number: No oak fees'__ ---- the site, including oak trees? /Y/ If yes, type --- Four sycamore frees of 280 - 480 trunks. -- —-------------- �/Ifes, y 4. Will any natural watercourses, surface fls., etc, ow �/ ex twin• be changed through project development?: _;Y7 /N/ p ------ *Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land- - 3 - B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (cont-) 5. Grading: If es, how many Will it be Will the project Y balance. -ed on site? require grading? /Y/ /N% cubi - yar:is., SRrox_t6,o00 Cr If not balanced, where will dirt be o`.Dt3ined or deposited"? ie pro 6. Are there any identifiable lamdeN or If'ees,ae��laeologiA hazaords on of the s to hasurtn acted (including unconpacted fill) . /Y/ /N/ Y r amort —_—_—__ he fill and will be excavated and recompacated (see attached soils --------'--- 7. Is the property 1 _ within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation? /Y/ N/ ~ Distance to ne:3rest fire station: 1, Miles County Station S. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: on site automobile E R_Y_traffic_ noise - -- Noise to be generated by project: one site automobile traffic noise -- 9. Funes: Odors generated by project: Foodpreparatin o Could toxic ftanes be generated? No 10. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used? Buildin to C-11 I with Title regulations in CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishedabove andfor is the exhibits present the data and information required initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Da to : -----= r For: Cahan/Crisell Properties - 4 - 8/85 IL X ) I ) I i -='i City of Diamond Bar Initial Studyor11 21660 EAST COPLEY DRIVE - SUITE 100 Page DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765-4177 714-860-2489 •FAX 714-860-3117 i:k�i�:i'r,:�i' k::^'i'i 4•f Yri4Yi'k�: iv'•:t:Nti4'itr'4`.�•v�'y,'.,�i.,. Lt.,a!+.. ;k>,:tr:•.t»t`,f•::i:':v,+Y:i::?isk.::.xr.+}`:•:;}T::�:kC`•,:....:.:x. R..rt. 1. Background: 1. Name of Applicant: C 2. Address and Phone Num Per of Pp ones t: 4. Date -of E v'ronmental Information Submittal: 5. Date of Environmental Checklist Submittal: 6. 7. Name of Pr posal if a iicable ( Tract No. if Subdivision): Mt�f�plkrl ���a.� 8. Related Applications (under the authority of this environmental determination): Yes No variance: Conditional Use Permit: Zone Change: General Plan Amendment: (Attach Completed Environmental Information Form) V. HORCHER GARY H. WERNER GARY G. MILLER JOHN A. FORBING ROBERT L. VAN NORT PHYLLIS E. PAPE*I • PAUL Coundlmunber' Councilmember city Merger .. Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Cauncilmernber . CITY OF DIAMOND BAR USES RECYCLED PAPER - City of Diamond Bar Initial Study Form Page 1 II. Environmental Impacts: (Explanations and additional Information to supplement all "yes" and 'possibly" answers are required to be submitted on attached sheets) Yes No Possibly 1. Earth. Will the proposal result In: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ ✓j_ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? L d.The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition, erosion of stream banks or land adjacent to standing water, changes in siltation, deposition or other processes which may modify the channel of constant or intermittently flowing water as well as the areas surrounding permanent or intermittent standing water? g.Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such s earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result In: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? �. c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any changes in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result In: a. Changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface run-off? _I c. Alterations of the course or flow of flood waters? d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality including but not limited to dissolved oxygen and turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ✓ g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? L Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ✓ City of Diamond Bar initial Study Form Page 3 Yes No Possibly 4. Plant LIfe. Will the proposal result In: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of plants? c. Reduction in the size of sensitive habitat areas or plant communities which are recognized >/ as sensitive? d. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? e. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal LIfe. Will the proposal result In: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms and insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the normal migration or movement of resident species? d. Reduction in size or deterioration in quality of existing fish orwitdlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Significant increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels I LZ 7. LIght and Glare. Will the proposal result In: a. Significant new light and glare or contribute significantly to existing levels of light and glare? S. Land Use. Will the proposal result In: a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use in an area? S. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal Involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condition? b. Probable interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? City of Diamond BErInitial Study Form Page 4 Yes No Possibly 11. Population. Will the proposal: a. Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect: a. Existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of Substantial additional vehicular movement? ----iL b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? / d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and goods. e. Alterations to waterbo me, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal: a. Have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1. Fire protection? 2. Police protection? 3. Schools? --� 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? 5. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? / 6. Other governmental services? — 15. Energy. Will the proposal result In: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing energy sources or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result In: a. A need for new systems, or Substantial alterations to public utilities? lZ_ City of Diamond Bar!nitiat Study Form Page 5 Yes No Possibly 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result In: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view? - —Z- 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result In: a. An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. The alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? / b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? V j C. A physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Restrictions on existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. Ci:y of Diamond Bar Initial Study Form Page 6 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance? a. Does the proposed project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate or significantly reduce a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the proposed project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c. Does the proposed project pose impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable . d. Does the project pose environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation: (Attach Narrative) IV. Determination: On the basis of this Initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Yes No Possibly I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been incorporated into the proposed project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. DQ Signature: �" ate: r Title.// vT /Ji�E� fZrL o For the the City of Diamond Bar, California --i" a,<_ ek and associates, civil engineers, inc. 398 S. Lemon Creek Drive, Suite E • Walnut, California 91789 • (714) 594-9702 (818) 331-8323 ( FAX (714) 5942658 May 10, 1990 TO: DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION VIA: DENNIS TARANGO, ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY/TRAFFIC ENGINEEO</ SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 90-00:36 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89440 - THE HOSPRALRY CENTER, BREA CANYON ROAD AT ROUrM 60 FREEWAY Pursuant to a meeting held on 5-8-90 in the office of the Planning Director and previous reviews of the 'Traffic Study" forthe subject project the following observations and recommendations are offered: 1. The opening of Grand Avenue between Route 60 and Valley Blvd. in the near future will result in a significant reduction in traffic on Brea Canyon Rd. between the same limits. This reduction is estimated to be about the same volume of increase we could expect with anticipated development of vacant properties to the north including the subject property. Therefore the mitigating measures proposed by this project should have a lasting effect through build -out of the immediate area. 2. Reciprocal access with the property to the north with resulting access to Lycoming Street is highly desirable and to that end should be a requirement of this proposed development to provide the necessary elements to effect that access. 3. The proposed traffic signal at the entrance to the subject project is an absolute must. The alternate proposed in lieu of traffic signal as proposed in the "study' dated December, 1989, Page 17, is unacceptable for the scope of the project now identified. Therefore if for some reason this proposed signal ran not be effected the approval of the project should be revisited. 4. The storm drain access easement adjacent to the drainage channel is only of sufficient width to provide for emergency access and should not be considered as an altemate access. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations are supplemental to those set forth in the Proposed System Improvements of the "study" and addendum dated 4-13-90, and are attached and made a part hereof. 1. On site circulation and parking elements shall provide for a future reciprocal ingress egress to the property immediately north of the subject property and a formal declaration by the subject property owner shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. Planning Commission ZC 90-0036 & CUP 89440 - Hospitality Center, Brea Cyn at Rte 60 Fwy Page 2 2. Installation of a traffic signal on Brea Canyon Road at the entrance to the subject project. Said signal shall be integrated within a'system' that includes the existing traffic signals at the on and off ramps of Route 60 and Brea Canyon Road, Lycoming Street and Colima Road. 3. Modification of the existing signal system at the on and off ramps of Route 60 and Brea Canyon Road to provide left tum phasing and other elements required to achieve the necessary mitigation measures. This particular improvement will require approval from Caltrans and shall include provisions that Diamond Bar is consulted regarding any subsequent modifications to this signal system by Caltrans. 4. Upgrade the traffic signal system on Brea Canyon Rd. at Lycoming Street by providing left turn signals or phasing for both north and south bound Brea Canyon Road. 5. Restripe Brea Canyon Road to achieve the required mitigation elements including the possibility of extending the existing left tum pocket for north bound Brea Canyon Road at Route 60 on-ramp. RLK: n b:2213:d b -pc: hosp'ty. c nt FXhiDJ 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 12, 1990 TO: ROBERT L VAN NORT. CIN MANAGER FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY ENGINECA SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDIES - BREA CANYON RD. BETWEEN RTE 60 FREEWAY AND LYCOMING STREET er744U 4 ecjO`:�S Traffic Impact Studies have been submitted for two projects on the east side of Brea Canyon Rd. within the subject limits, a hotel complex on the trailer sales parcel and a commercial office complex on the comer of Lycoming. These reports Indicate that each project can develope without impacting the traffic flow on Brea Canyon Rd. Each project,of course, will have to incorporate traffic mitigating measures. in the case of the project on the comer of Lycoming only striping for channelization on both legs of Lycoming and some parking restrictions adjacent to the channelization is necessary. In the case of the hotel complex a traffic signal system midway between the Freeway and Lycorning is necessary and will have to be interconnected and coordinated with the other two signal systems. The significant aspect of traffic on Brea Canyon Rd. is that we can expert a decrease in volumes when Grand Ave. between the Freeway and Valley Blvd. is opened. This decrease in volume is estimated to be a push as to Increases generated by future buildout of adjacent properties arid hence the ability for Brea Canyon to accept future development without significant traffic impacts, In reviewing the report for the corner project I advised the engineer and architect that the omission of the Grand Ave. opening should be corrected to better substantiate their report. 1 also advised representatives of each project that they should avail themselves of each others report and that they further explore the possibility of a mutual access between both projects as I feel each could benefit and it would certainly improve upon overall circulation. But l indicated that this was not an engineering requirement. RLX-nb: rara:db:bmacynarf cc: Matt Foratt RKA CIVIL ENGINEERS 2913 L©mon Craolc Dr., Walnut CA (714) 594.0-02 (1310) 331.8323 \D1 BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC. ENGINEERING AND PLANNING Transportation, Traffic, Municipal. Transit 17701 Mitchell North, Suite 101 Irvine, California 92714 (714) 474-1131 April 13, 1990 Mr. Ken Spear Cahan/Crisell Properties 362 W. Mission Avenue BDI Ref. No.: 890720 Suite 105 Escondido, CA 92025 SUBJECT: Traffic Study Addendum for the Diamond Bar Hospitality Center Dear Mr. Spear: Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc. (BDI) has prepared this addendum to our traffic study for your development in the City of Diamond Bar, in accordance with your revised site plan. This addendum will serve to analyze the traffic effects of a change in the project de- scription. Figure 1 presents a reduction of your current site proposal. Table 1 summarizes the changes in land use for your current proposal and for your previous proposal described in our report. The major changes involve floor area for restaurant and retail uses. Traffic Generation Table 2 summarizes the trip generation rates utilized for the project and also summarizes the anticipated daily; AM, and PM peak hour traffic to be generated by the project. According to the old site plan the project would have generated 5,218 trip ends, including, 606 AM peak hour trips and 551 PM peak hour trips. With the new site plan, the project is expected to gener- ate 3,623 daily trip ends, (326 AM peak hour trips) and 429 PM peak hour trips. A decrease of 1,595 total daily trip ends are expected for the revised project. Traffic Distribution The orientation of traffic (percent/share of traffic in each direction) for the currently proposed project will not change from the previous proposal. Orli m r Z t O 0 a T �^ O s Sri T C t Land Use Hotel General Retail Fast -Food with Drive Through High Turnover (Sit -Down) -Restaurant TABLE 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Previously Proposed Project ---------------- 135 Rooms 15,000 S.F. 10,550 S.F. Is] Currently Proposed Project ---------------- 135 Rooms 21,000 S.F. 2,800 S.F. 5,000 S.F. TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY TRIP GENERATION RATES AM Peak PM ------------- Peak Land Use Daily- ------------ In ----- Out In Out ---------------- Hotel (Trips per Room) ------ 8.36 0.46 0.24 0.56 0.47 General Retail 24 0 0 2.4 2.4 (Trips per 1,000 S.F.) Fast -Food with Drive-Throilgh 353.46 24.26 24.26 16.44 15.80 (Trips per 1,000 S.F.) High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (Trips per 1,000 S.F.) 200 10.70 8.40 11.15 8.76 TOTAL TRIP ENDS AM -Peak PM Peak Land Use ---------------- Daily ------- ------------ In ----- Out ----- ------------- In ----- Out -- Hotel (135 Rms) 1,129 62 32 76 63 General Retail (21,000 S.F.) 504 0 0 50 50 Fast -Food with Drive -Through (2,800 S.F.) 990 68 68 46 44 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (5,000 S.F.) 1,000 54 - 42 - 56 - 44 - TOTAL: 3,623 184 142 228 201 Previous Proposal 5,218 318 288 285 266 Reduction 31% 42% 51% 20% 24% Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, Fourth Edition. Mr. Ken Spear Cahan/Crisell Properties April 13, 1990 Page Two Intersection Impact The project has been analyzed for its impacts on existing condi- tions, on conditions forecast for the previous proposal, and for proposed -project conditions for the surrounding street system. ICU calculations were reevaluated and the results for the three (3) key intersections are summarized in Table 3. A review of Table 3 shows slight improvement in ICU rates for both AM and PM, but no change in the Levels of Service for both AM and PM, from the Previously Proposed Project to the Currently Proposed Project. For the Existing Plus Proposed Project, the key inter- sections are expected to operate at LOS "C" or better in the morning peak hours. In the evening peak hour, conditions are expected to be at LOS "D" on Lycoming Street, with SR 60 Ramps and Colima Road operating at LOS "E". The intersection of Brea Canyon Road and SR 60 westbound would be mitigated to 0.89 (Level D) by providing the improvements listed below for the proposed project. Mitigation Measures You requested a statement of the intersection improvements dis- cussed in our traffic study. The improvements are as follows: o The traffic signal for State Route 60 off -ramp must be modified to provide a left turn phase for traffic turning onto the freeway and a right turn phase for traffic turning off the freeway. This improvement will provide for signal system operation and also will improve the Level of Service to Level D. o A third lane.should be striped southbound on Brea Canyon Road from.the•project entrance to the Route 60 ramp inter- section. This lane would turn right onto the freeway west- bound. o The traffic signal existing at Brea Canyon and Lycoming Street must be modified to provide left turn signals for northbound and southbound. o The level of traffic forecasted for the site would still require a traffic signal at the main access to allow left - turns onto Brea Canyon Road. \I TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PREVIOUS PROJECT AND EXISTING PLUS CURRENT PROJECT INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AM Peak Hour ------------------------------------------- Existing Plus Existing Plus Existing Previously Currently Conditions Proposed Project Proposed Project ------ ---------------- ----------- Intersection ICU- LOS ICU- LOS ICU- LOS Brea Canyon Rd at: Colima Road SR 60 WB On/Off Ramp Lycoming Ave. Intersection ------------ Brea Canyon Rd. at: Colima Road SR 60 WB On/Off Ramp Lycoming Ave. 0.37 A 0.40 A 0.39 A 0.67 B 0.74 C 0.71 C 0.60 A 0.62 B 0.61 B PM Peak Hour Existing Plus Existing Plus Existing Previously Currently Conditions Proposed Project Proposed Project ---------- ---------------- -------------- ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 0.93 E 0.94 E 0.94 E 0.93 E 1.00 E 0.98 E 0.81 D 0.84 D 0.83 D ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service 0 Mr. Ken Spear Gahan/Crisell Properties April 13, 1990 Page Three If you have any questions or require additional information, feel free to call me at our office. Sincerely, BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC. Rock-E..Miller, P.E. 0720DBar.Add/#89-7(b) FOR THE CEW F"T ALITY ER P r �, I T H rE' UTY OF DIAMOND BAR FREI-SENTED TO: C.,AAANICRItSELL pRoPtERTIE'S PREPAPED U'f: I I -DARNIELL, IIIIC. Y A N BASMACIYAN-DAVINELL9 INC- FNG)1dEEiiING AND P �s `, Transs�or'ation, 7ra`tic,NING unicipat�f, Transit h47ransisrc e. (714) 474-1131 1rvir:�, Czlibmi_ 92714 17701 �iltctali t'?ctt`;, Ss'� 10. DecelRber 41 1589 Ken speaz'SDI k F. NO-: s90720C� is n/Crisell Prope-rti-es 362 W. mission Avenue suite 105 L� 92025 Escondido, itality Center subject: Traffic study for The Di.amcnc.-1 Bar 1-1osp_ Dear rir. . Snell, Inc. pear: a Vo .Z authors :� aticn, FJ�SariB.Ci�j n -Da- r C'S�veI.opne:lt l.'. :xcc,..orC1axlcp 4T3_til .rami Ct tri) fi(: StUd.y for y��L>3 haw pr vp2.:r'e.d t1'E C: ;n the City of Diamond Bar. the of the report includes z complete analysis of = f nal at the pro, entrance . er�'tion feasibility for a traffic sig please call me if you have ,y other questic.ls or need additional information. S4_ncerely, Ba.smaciyan-Darnell, Inc. Roc'c E. yiller, P.E. ' 7-i- tu,lrgr: (a.) yp�FFIC FOR �"'Jsat17-L' N T ER F T P, "' 'k oy C''UON 11,T OF prepared for: CAH3,224/CRISELL PROPERTT S 362 W. Mission Aventle Suite 105 Escondido, CA 92025 Prepared by: BA S MACI YPSi -DP�ET-L, INC. 17701 Ilitchell 'k,7orth S=ite 101. C.'k 92714 (71A) 474-1131 hl � \ r"'AA /�� TABLE UI' CONTENTS PacTe INTRODUCTION . . . . . , . . . . ~ ~ ~ . , . , ' , , , , , , , l EXISTING COHDITION *S , . . . . . . . . . . , . _ , ~ . . , . . 4 PIZ C 11,-IlElJ�T.RD . . . , . . . - , . . , . . 8 Tr Generation . . . . . , . , . .. . . . . ~ . . . . . . 8 Tz4rj Dietvibot-iorz . , . . . . . .. , ' . . , . . . . . . . 11 C�oouzreat Pro-jecto. . . . . . . . . . . ^ . . . . . . . . II . . , . . . ~ , . . . ^ . ° . 14 JLCCF�SS J12J3 Z�4TERNLTAL CZIlCUTZA�'IDN. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 SI("�iALZ%ED ACCESS FKADI8II.ITY. . . , , . . , , . , , , . . . 21 8igooI Spacing .. . . . . . . . . , . . . . ~ . . . . . , . 31 Proposed System improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 I LIST OF Fl.',URES Page F 1 1` -,?E 11 VICINITY . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 3 Ali /-t"-1 PFrX IT, Ur I IT 2-"(-3U 11E' 4 'PROJEC' TRIP DIS'C,,IBUT 'JG'171 . . . . :L 2 (7 T r I 7 - I kl� D :1 F 1' 13 V 7, - (T-PZA T" - 7 Tlj-K 11; 130�TRAFI—C V-"0-LTM-lES 3 F. F T EYR0j'ECT--.Q.EL?=D TRIP D7STRIBUTION WITH ACCESS RESTRICTIOH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 FIGURE Pi AM/P: PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOI.-JZES Wl'nl ACCESS RESTRICTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 FIGITPE 9 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOUR TP-AFFIC VOLUYES WITH ACCESS RESTRICTIC11 . . . . . . . . . 20 I L 15,j' OF T p_?SLE S I: accl G lr i ON 1 i �T IF T.— `J� fi� 1J�17 y - C" ;S't'>� I: yam._ . • C, ON REDU sufa l , rDr op, p -� 1=•z� -. � r :ter- j. of a 49,915 O,evelopll. 0, f cot S-�-, C- 10 'hat 0 5 e of Freeway) or. o 67 c. Gr� -,4- 7.-- _E, Sc 1, V-1 t, ,,t of cc, r,- 2-T 8. C. p y- C, C,- at rr, a Vic, eet SY stp-' C, ,j T major St 1 -�- _'. y�y ,'1 I ,, J,, J � r kJ ' -3-- CNI Li 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS `oposec' pre_ :;^.tly used for trailer and and a St_ -a.g2 O>erc�t lC n. The sitehas on Bre;_. canyon Road located immediately north of Stats Mkt �.�l+l�E' #,r-F?;;?;.'7� ' . In t`!1 :l. r'll;�"C1u tiC area, develop?Aent i c't;_' C f. 7-e 2; .den Ci , Oi f lc- and i-ndustrial park uses. -� ,�i v :y -C:e 1� tc r?�e. c<jQct on the-outheast corner of Ct t rTt CSD. 3 ty ,rh,a c ,i .i,a.le f._.Mily r'E�F,i6ence ir, fel'. c�i'.a L _i: _d fGr cc)jilmercia . uses' as `r7 �'�.1 i.r �c S1'IE-..Titicti.l l ].v1T:.g quartel- . C, the •*,7e t Of > ea C a yor i1�,CC1 �;ouh of L`Icominr clre S1nC� se �.in �' res i .den -,:es o CT: the- so'J �-i]w _,.; � C:c% of Bl -ea Li.ny01 Road urd ccmin ;.�yyU,.ue Is .Za !ea.rni.ng cer_WeT that has a single access Lj off of BI -ea Canyon Road. . To the north of Lycoming Avenue is a ;1,,, �; ar'�. �J� th7� .port-hz.�s-•`_ COX -1z^:` of Brea Road aid iyccx.ing the*'e -i s a vZc;int p�arcei of lan-J:. Easterly Of Brea LC31yon exists single family residences. Roadways within the area that will he affected by the project are ti;a ;,p6G westbound c._/off•-ramp, Colima Road, Lycoming Street, and Brea Canyon Road. The S.R. 60 (Pomona) Freeway is an eight - lane divided freeway that provides east/west circulation in the area and connects with downtownLos P geles. Immediately east of the project area. is the S.R. 57 freeway which runs in a north/ south direction and connects orange county located to the south with the Poruona a.nC: Sun Dimas area to the north. Brea Canyon Road i,s a north/south arterial which extends to Valley Boulevard, approximately one mile -north of the project site and south to connect with th- S.R. 57 approximately three A miles south of the project site. In the immediate vicinity of the project, the roadway is improved -:.o provide two travel lanes in each direction and a painted median area that permits left -Curns. fu l interchange is provided at the SR 60 Freeway. Co1.4:ma Road is an east,/west arterial and is fully improved to provide two travel lanes in each direction and a painted median with turning lanes. it intersects Brea Canyon Road south of SR 60. Lycoming Street i.s a two-lane industrial collector. It intersects Brea Canyon Road north of the project site. The east leg is a cul-de-sac while the east leg extends to Lemon Avenue. `N `Tr C S' :� 1S it -he c:rea a3c-e locate-- o.n Brea �c"3.ityOn RGcC7 at rC.l1 :2. Rea, ; Stat.. Roti:tF 6t; w-_, :tbound ramps, and Lycoming Avenue and Valley Boulevard. Lxi_st__ng traffic volume: in the: area were obtained from the Los P11geles County Public Works Department and studies newly conduct- ed for projects in the area. In addition, EDI collected manual turning trove°nen.t counts at Brea Canyon Road and S.R. 60 westbound on/off-ramp and at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Avenue. Figure 3 presents the existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement -r 4 -5- 41 counts off: 'Brf_3c Carryon load at Colima Road, S.R. 50 westbound f- r�:':c t :1 L�/� C'":1_,',r` %�� t. .liG ilf'Sy. ?mtoi ,rser'�'r=or,C,' 4 1.^2IlLZ- , ii2d as the most c'r itical intersections that will be impacted by the project. tCeS,nF'y�:,ot r1. 0ti cauac4 ty and levels cf ;xt-g A1 ./PX p@�.Gl wzltersEctions wereisi Road f<)three Drea ty U# at7.cr, ( �� t 1 c ti :�.s' ¢ it t:' c_ =G'C 071 °crclC:_ S J ti �_ y.; S n fi t.� r to lilt Li: t % 3.Cje'lt 7 L.i.t^:at�.J% l C)c',2t1i- :c'1%e! *=)y Nf i�P:_.^c (�sCJ�S� c.L each l;1tErsBCt'iOn. rseJcl of ' r FOg r a?f< E'�3iL tif� ttiaffitrafficke3"�- &z,,ce, S.pp ro 1r E--eC. cls ECJ.-l.Otas o �., ,,-Zce'jen-t, Light Traffic Good, sight to Moderate 'Traffic 2r�Jiacrd.fi7i? 11'ra -Lc , with Insi gni fiCCn-L. Delay L A Lzvy Tra f" i C, w ith Sign; ficar_U relay E Severe Congestion-, and Delay F Failed, Indicated Levels Cannot Be Handled T;rly pLbl i ,� age_ca.es have identified Level ui Service "D" as the maximum allowable "Standard" service Level during peak hours at 4' 't' ation measures are considered for tra¢zic at intersect-LO:s. 1.11 -.J - poorer 1 poorer levels of service. The results Of he ICU analysis found that each of the three Brea t n c better _n canyon Road iT!teLs�_-CtiC_is care C�)Eo'?+�-iriG at LOS `•• {: the morning. In the evening, the Lycominc� intersection is fund ti.oriizl,r at Level. of Service I'D" , while the intersection with the westbound freeway ramp and the Ccli.ma Road intersection are operating at a Level of Service "E''. Table 1 summarizes the ICU analysis. The ICU worksheets are presented in Appendix A. 6 I . ICU =- I.z�:erse :tion Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service 7 TABLE 1 ' SUM2-g.-Ry Or EXISTING CONDITIONS 1.'TERSECTION CAPACITY UTILI?,ATIGN Ali nH Peak HOx,r T.rti i,� S I CUT LOS BreaC,�y :.; z Road at Colima Roo O.�o ?. 0.93 E SPS GG WB On/Off Kamp O.EO A Lycoming Avenue I . ICU =- I.z�:erse :tion Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service 7 TRAFFIC It ri�Generation ,z 1_p gen.exati_bn ^hazactera.stics of tre p: oject are estimated ba sed on nr. .nt(_-:d in. the Tr:i_n Gene-, -,aua.l Fourth tizLe; rif '.!.'rarsp^..tat rl E;Cilil?src, Table 2 n i -Li:.:i....riz. th,-�, c;ea rat`:..cn rates for the T i c and 8 _r.) �:UG,i c..T.'?. rS C�? ant.- �'1.Y c? i -ed dali.yr, M, and PH i)'.ax _I ,1:,. -L _r" ilf'7c to be hy �hr pr.c jeC Rev -Lew of Tl _ii:le 2 -,hoes that the project is expectecnto garter -a e 5,213 daily trip Exed.s• . 6o6 _7ui peak hoar trips, ( 318 inbound a.-ld 288 outbound) , ztnd 551 trips ar, the PH peak hour ( 285 vehicles in-- k)ownd and 266 vehicles cles outbouin.d.) . BDS made as adjustment to account for "passer-by" or diverted trips in accordance with the guidelines set in t;•+.e ITE Trip Generation Manual, T'ourth Edition, concerning retail/commercial land uses. These are land uses that attract trips that would be passing the complex: anyway (for example, a stop at the fast-food or retail on the way home from work). Thus, they are not "new" trips added to the surrounding streets. A 35 percent reduction in the "base generation:' rate was applied to account for "passer-by" effect for t:r :� reta .i. an^. tast--food lane. Uses. No passer-by fa,c -o `s appropriate for the f:otel land u;- a . Table 3 presents the trip rate adjustment to there uses. Therefore, the proposed development will generate 3,787 daily "new trips on the street systems, 426 trips in the APS peak hour and 406 trips in the evening peak hour. The trip generation summary from Table. 2 is used to evaluate the driveway and accessibility to the adjacent streets. The "passer- by" generated trips in Table 3 will be used to evaluate intersec- ii Ms on the street system beyond the proposed project. 0 r� , TABLE 2 =TIP GENERATION SUMMj.Ry TRIP GEKE;LATIOta RATES Laid Use. Daily --, -t,, (?` . i_,s p r Room) 8.36 General -Retail 2,11 (Trips per KSF) Fast -Food with Drive-' hr_ micrh 353.46 (Trips per KSF) TOTAL TRIP ENDS Land TJse Dai 1y Hotel (135 Rms) 1,129 General Retail. (15 KSF) 360 Fast -Food Frith. Drive -Through (10.55 KSF) 3,729 TOTAL; 5,218 SAS Out 17 0'.;t - 0.46 0.74 0.56 0.47 0 0 2.4 2.4 24.26 24.26 16.44 15.80 AM Peak Phi Peak in Out In out 62 32 76 63 0 0 36 -36 2561 256 1.73 167 31E 288 285 266 K;^.F = '.1'i,ousand Square Feet oi..i•T.ce` ITE Trip zzi Z.linjaiii-j tl., Yourth Edition. i c J TABLE 3 SU Sr__7�RY Cr THE ADJJS'i'M NT TRIP GENERATION (REDUCTION FOR PASSER-BY AND DIVERTED TRIPS) TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use --------------- Hotel (135 Rms ) General Retail (15 KSF) Fast -Food with Drive -Through (10.55 KSF) TOTAL TRIP ENDS REDUCED BY 35% PASSER-BY FACTOR M Peak Hous PM Peak Hour. DaiIY In Out In Out 62 62 76 63 360 0 0 36 36 3,729 256 256 173 167 _10 Alf Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Daily In Out In Out Hotel (135 Rms) (a) 1,129 62 32 76 63 General Retail (15 KSF) 234 0 0 23 23 Fast -Food with Drive -Through (10.55 KSF) 2,424 166 166 113 1.08 TOT.7\_L.: t 3,787 228 198 212 194 1 (a) - Nc reduction was taken for the Hotel land use. KSF = Thousand Square Feet Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, Fourth Edition. Note: Rates are based on a 35% .eduction for adjacent streets for Retail/Restaurant, as discussed in the ITE Trio Generation Manu- al, Fourth Edition. _10 Trin Distrib:?ti.on `T'a..3 trip making ch ararit.eristics of fix;- project-, have beer. eStiP-Zt_ '.St;? i2 ti�F:_ Ft;�t J c? paged ur ient &t iorl Cif ' rdtL3 C t!_7 anc1 froze A: e T-:% o e-ct Si.+. e. Thti anticipated trip raking characteristics are presented on Figure the tr -. p UYxa^-I � i 3 fJ2 pre se s ail 1', " es G and .3 and the C;En+..[..g^ e c'f r "icTure 4, the projec��" 'ela l �'--r't tC' L were � C.� C,ra 6� }:: je aC'�]a0e.1 stZee ai tine resint5 are presented on Figure �. Concurrent Fro 'ects �,. re Nes oiia. % 4 Eni chr-c:.'ked the } ores t I,r.s �_n, county der � fy any concurrent pro; jects pending in the vicinity which would affect n futitre traffic levels. The most significant project is the extension: of gran(' Avenue from the SIR 60 freeway to Valley Boulep vard, about two miles east of the project site. The projecIL. is e -.Dectpd to reduce overall demand for Brea Canyon Road ire the project vicinity, ?4o significant local developments are being considered along the Brea Canyon Road corridor, however, BDI ;toted that several projects are currently tinder construction iza the a,re.:: north of Lycoming Street. �.�,datic,sal ao1.i.tme of traffic for t}7G":? projects %a 7.1. 3. Ie.C?ld,,, L•.n effect Of t i' GRcilCi' For ak'la].V's4 - i p-arpJ see, it ?_:i presented that increase -T.o local development- and diversion to Grand Avenue are approxi- mately e(,-aa.l. Future volumes are thu.S the comh'na .iOXi Of Exist~ my and project -related traffic. y kil I X)ZIYY = AM/PM TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASMACIYAN-OARNELL, INC. FIGURE 5 PROJECT -RELATED AM/PM'PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES --13- E D 41 liLPACTS AND MITIGATIONS The prnject bca�i been Z.�Tj_-Jyzed for it=: impacts on existing condi- roject for the surrounding st cor,,ditions plus project plus project AH/PM tjor�_s and ex- irig I i Street Figure 6 presents C'Y, I r, trF_ffic Ievpl.z-,. ICTj calculat-i07-Is were Qoy,,c' and t.ie results Of 1 ( 3 ) key intersections are fo- the tlre,--� the TCTJ on revi-w af Table 4 shows that each of urmarizYu"C" or better L -he key jr,"ersections �5- expected cp., er a.. t e at LOS I D 4 �_kitions are Leve even� V _ con -2 q peak hour, j --n -the r' -1r1 -..-'-.',',g. 3'll the Conditions are at Level E at the SR 60 Ramps at j,yco.m. - ing Strt�P_l - ec- is shc)wn to have a signif- and at Cc-_ij.rP.a R,)a,-.,. Also, the. pro] - 'mpact upor ramp intersection, which falls from icant the SR 60 r4L: p Level F to Level F. A review or tk)e 1CU calculations suggests ed t�-.rough a mixture of actions that m Canyon Road �it4aatior_ can be provided including parking restrictions and restriping Brea traffic signal modifications at northbound, plus for 3 lanes nor Colima Road and at the SR 60 westbound ramp to provide left -turn and right -turn arrows. 14 I A 4A Ng LEGEND XX/YY - AM/W TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0-143/146 PROJECT SITE L to 4-n f b7 46 PRC)— Ec' TS I i E o"Irls GdLDK�!—sl �111111715 11 ��' , , FIGURE 6 EIXISTING PLU12, PROIJECT-RELATE-D WMACIYAN-DA RNELL, INC. AM.IPM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES _5/7 _24119 4-116/99 —6/6 STREET LYCO, !NG 16122— LEGEND XX/YY - AM/W TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0-143/146 PROJECT SITE L to 4-n f b7 46 PRC)— Ec' TS I i E o"Irls GdLDK�!—sl �111111715 11 ��' , , FIGURE 6 EIXISTING PLU12, PROIJECT-RELATE-D WMACIYAN-DA RNELL, INC. AM.IPM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES I �.A AA TABLE 4 SUri:-J-kRY OF EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERS'E'CTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION inter sectiOn Brea Canyon Roar; at: Colima Road SR 60 WB On/Off Ramp Lycoming Avenue Existing Conditions AF PM Peas: Hour Peak Hour ICT -1 LOS ICU LOS 0.37 A 0.93 E 0.67 B 0.93 E 0.60 A 0.81 D ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS = Level of Service 1.6 Existing Plus Project -------------------- I Ali P2: Peak Hour Peak Hcu i CU --LOSS ICU Les 0.40 A 0.94 E 0.74 C 1.00 E 0.62 B 0.84 D C ; tND INTERNAL CIRCULATION [t - been. re ed .for ac^ess to Brea Canyon j le -c)rclect site plan ha:� R a3 .na foz' iria: ?:ic1 circulation. The �.Mc :ss t Brea Canyon Road - p1`upt7" �d f3:0i^ ihL' :gin Ei� b725i.�JCUiid oi1/0 Y3TRp olio about Rodd w , the Coun of Las from L �:o:,'.ing Avenue. In addit on, y e r' -.-,* t: e prc�pnSed ex ve1.op- 1. i J w_ 7 �i i A1C Of Clay i S alkaCCe55 to ova: }'�r1r _F cc:z t r G`i:a?nn g to LycoTAT:g Street. jr— -i �crecw.st .� a�: the main ari.ve�aay are high enough cl,ir at the p'roDeCt �_=;1t unless 3 -1 J01: J, Uy unless outbound l=ft turn: art, :.c n to other signals, a new �ixX%.ire. EL' . Due to the rlOst. s} 1 g _a`fic 3.gnul ;r::st ae Closely stiid'-2c' • l f iti i s determined that a traffic t T_bZ0 Signal i5 h)e 3t i�i0}�ri.ate, access should be limited to left c_vbrs iz on1y, Outbound left turns should be prohibited. This. _eztric icn w�.11 alteb the access volumes and increase usage of theyLycomin Street e pit, n si3CShT1 n Fan"d Fige 7 ure 9 ( e Fic.ur e 8 (project --Related y oltrnles) , volumes). This nevi.sec's access plan will r.ct affect traffic conditions south of the site., bu'L i-� affect- conditions at Brea Canyon Road and i.,yccmii�4' sigS14 fJ_:�al:t:ly. Without mit.j_ga.tion, traffic co:;.0.i tions r.' at Ly cc:;:�Ti� will urop to Level of service "E'" LTi the p.m.n ccndi..tion can be m- .1. ed readily, by restripi ng Lycom;i.-ng to provide left -tura 1aaes at Brea Canyon, Road. our review Of the final site plan presented in this report per-- ir,its the conclusion to be made that the mitigated accecAlso' sslocatin gild d,es gn e =n adeG' ,uatel_y acc•o,rvaudate the projec. review Cf ;the ?li Gi1or site Circulations and parking does not i.idluvte a ry problems anti/or safe-�y issues on --site. 0 TV11 `F *# 17 LYCON SK Z-6 -LI ?A -rlll 0AID I I LEGEND XX% - TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE 23% PROJECT SITE m 0 10% r FIGURE 7 BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC. PROJECT --RELATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITH ACCESS RESTRICTION XX " - AM/PM TRAFFIC VOLUMES DASMACIYAN.DARNELL, INC. FIGURE 8 PROJECT -RELATED AM/PM'PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH ACCESS RESTRICTION I coo.mi\ LEGEND XXNY - AMIPM TRAFFIC VOLUMES ''OJECT SITE cn 54 7f.'s rz 4.21 45:,3 FIGURE 9 EXISTiNr, PLUS PROJECT -RELATED 13ASMACM&N-DARNELL, l"C• AMIPM, PEAK HOU9 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH ACCESS RESTRICTION --20- avi�� X517 .�Tn rT:T IOIJ2- Ln 155/233--*, coo.mi\ LEGEND XXNY - AMIPM TRAFFIC VOLUMES ''OJECT SITE cn 54 7f.'s rz 4.21 45:,3 FIGURE 9 EXISTiNr, PLUS PROJECT -RELATED 13ASMACM&N-DARNELL, l"C• AMIPM, PEAK HOU9 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH ACCESS RESTRICTION --20- �.i SIGHALIZED ACCESS FEASIBILITY �ics_nal S acinu c;z;-n-ter anal the L, -,1-C ops �: ! c T.prEC�l� , Lased upon �r: r.Ccess Y'E'.Strictlon to ? a is _. C u 1 j C3 E <` 1Z n}ll€ LO explore whether a ir'.) . .?t. 1. i. Ti:1 (:1 5 Sr, C. t.es .. .. . all .Ot.l , ;-�pas,ed Pr C,je t eri i til etii'i.E F. i, tj. Y i S c r7 't _ lac :,,�?;c C�� �'s''- c, traffic ,1r cc: .,e-na "it la the p -,� h traf res- et.•?- to nearby sig l C�tl: 1 L {;;� :t _c�.Lp and at .�.:"`c.,.�e eio1.:`.=.^c-- F0 Freeway Of.`-2 L+j vJ!Z1. r1iJ Street on Brea Ca�;ii Cn ieoad. S r' t?rC�S f 1r t'_'"afY�_C: s1.aP.a s noroial-1.V rve-giji—e c' rE:�i_C'r _c.r1 g"a15. !-' ^l �ejr tM :'1 jl �. Gc2nY traffic it This ir.l .�.? uia'1` tiJ1CO fOt Sk,c�.C_LTiC� + `" % e 13 aE .'"hat t?:a f'. Cp�'i_c�.`i lca:s between �- er. It also 7_rt�; a..;_i.er �_c.ior, d:� not ist`luence eac2: o'. r.�.� i:hc t t}xcr e T;ZOL'iC generally be sL! f f iclent intersection spat _ng to provide adecivate length for. the left turn pockets for of the block. each intersection at the ends c4- i design seal'dards do nom prohibit the provi-- Trie Ca .tLari s s__r.��_ ": less than 600 fee.., cion of traffic sagra1s,.with spacing o• 3 - to insure l�,0:.�2 ver, a u-u� e1"" ;,f' de i.gI recauta.ons must ?�e ter=eri -.These . tha' r �`r c,rT^ _C'nal S c_C°J-n L.'Lla overate Sc�..-Sic C. ecu'-zo^s are as Eollr�cas sutLicit!1 for appropr3_a`p.cie`si o ASC t. r� 1c_ft t2_.� r� poC�.>� L.s at iriterser°tions on bot.( ends of the 3 block. c The block lEr.gth must he suf.f.icien fo-- storage of through vehicles having to stop pt red sign -11S within the block. o The sig -n -a i zed inter sections mus'C_ be adequately designer -1 to traffic signals at the insure that notoris":s do not rista?;e traZ far intersection from tra,"fic signals at the near intersec- tion. o The ignals vast be designed and operated as a.n intercon- nected system. 5 aC2,e^u at elv C�.eS4.Qii�d to ensiar � t h —t problers cail generally be avoided. heae are numerous examples of Closei_y spaced traffic signals. ,. - •= x A.L. operations at most of these sagnals have been designe o n - ensure that t��er� are no problems associated with closely de- signed signals. It is perhaps very important to note that an extremely large number of Closely spaced signals involve a. sig- nala.zed freeway oft -ramp -and a nearby signalized arterial inter- section, jus' +he type of condition being encountered at the Brea C,nyoii site. At the Brea Canyon site, and at many other sites, Ed -21- i is not necessary .to provide for left tura traffic in all directions. At, Brea Canyon Road and SR t because the is notneceto reeway p�•c�vi de a lcf t turn for southbound traffic, O%s -rWnin i s one-way and suc�7 a turn :.could be in the wrong di rec- tion. 1n the nor thbou;;e. directioYi, the left turns are also not reuuired at the proj ct entrance, since this is a "T" intersec- tion and there. is r, c; A.eg ;:o tura left into,northbound. As a Of t;: _S, 5to-age for left, turn vehicles is not an issue at the Brea Canyor, site. is"1 Ci'.C7.''.". t.c� e�?8IA1I1C trc�f£ic: s i ;13.x. sxrstem fe, sibility and blork s-t:.�Or e fo:� tt;amin�? traffic BDI: L .ilized the TRANSYT•-7F' Traffic ti- S,_gnal Ti i n;j Model . This model provides a arameter for a given and given mizati.on of traffic signal system timing p sig .al system and t.raff:ic volur;;es. Ou'cput of the model includes predictions of vehicle queue len9t! and a traffic signal inter- connect timing plan for the proposed operation. , In additionthe model can predict traffic problems for other nhem tmovements mie and opera -based upon traffic sic;_r .al y g tion requirements. The Brea Canyon site TRANS`1T-7F Model was coded to include the SR 60 Free -W. -ay off -ramp, the proposed signal at the project en-- xistinia g traffic sical at Lycoming Street. The trance, and the e model blas in�_tiall.Y coded to r. eflt ct the existing ed problems with str ipirg s;u� l.y e'er sicns o f t.he: ;;lCde1 i dencified eft turns certain movements at the intersections, including cert nn thbo�. e s aBret nyor, onto the freeway on-ramp, and left d onto Lyco turns from northbound Brea Canyon Roamovements Street. Both of these problems are because these traffic T�°� TRAPtSYTu7F ;.eptly do not have protEctd left turn arrows. gdel, therefore, points to the need to construct left turn phas- P;ing at both of these locations to providz satisfactory traffic future. After the TRANSYT-7F Model is modified operation in the the TRANSYT to reflect left tura: phasing at thess locations, operation which resulted Madel provided a proposed traffic sigrnal i.z satisfactory performance of all locations in the system. The most critical parameters to system performance arwas ting the total nurbt--r of vehicles expected to be in queue, at a red traffic: signal intersection proposed at the project en- trance. Ti;�' model T1J%��1GtS %rivet t.?� Ii:axim-,Im c-ue,je. for northbound at the' prajcc t entraagce would be `? >, uxic� ately 12 vehicles in all �:d, while the total storage for this length is in lanes provid excess of �0 vehicles. This insures that there is satisfactory room for storage of vehicles the traffic signal system is de- signed and operated as assumed by the TRANSYT-7F Model- The complete TRATSYT-7F results are included in an Appendix to this report. -22- y� '.'' �.(ll�JrL�`v??;�ellt; L J. in Order for the`:: traff is s�-gn�fl. system to be operated in a Sat? s- r. �ia'YC?S; t:0a(q be Lw ee % 4'P 60 and Lycoli!ing -r c":,Dry- ma,_�=:.. r. i `; e-: location: %h i '_:1� is ing improvements will b required , by 1. State Route 60 Off -Ramp 1' e t� a.ffi�� s_c.zal must be mcdif.ied to provide a left turn phase :f -Dr traffic L- rning onto the freeway and a r�aht turn �tl S^ f �Ji.' i r .f i.'_C tl _ 1-7._T1Ci Off th freeway westbound onto r:o w nor -t iinc . ?also, traffic signal indica- tion displays on the='j_gnL.l pole mast arm controlling scuthhcu:id Brea Canyon must be modified to provide a pro- arammed visibility :,ignal hear'.. This wi7.1 prevent it from being confused with oche! signals by traffic on Brea Canyon Road. These wignal.heads car. be adjusted so the signals are not visible when viewed from inappropriate angles. 2. B ---e--, Canyon Road at -the Proposed Project Entrance The traffic signal must be designed for a protected left turn phase southbound. The traffic signal controller must be capable of providing coordinated operation compatible with the Caltrans signal controller controlling the freeway . afro^s standard Typa 170 COT:_. troller with a timed based coordination operation on a clock compati?Dle caith State Freeway system will satisfy this requirement. This is the expected design standard for traffic signal controllers in the city of Diamond Bar, and it is the current standard for signal controllers in Los Angeles County. rust arm traffic signal indications for through traffic, both northbound and southbound must be provided as programmed visibility signals so that these signals are not confused with signals controlling traffic in the same direction upstream from the intersection. 3. Brea Canyon at Lycoming Street. The traffic signal existing must be modified to provide left turn signals for northbound. In conjunction with this imcxovement it i� i.1.1 be necessary to provide a left turn '!7n•3. fCit ryu.t`hhound; �e%o1�SF' 1t 1S inappropriate i.0 prO- vic,e left t,,jrn phase in one direc.tioai, but not the other c_irec ion. Yr, acic'+iti.on, the traffic signals on the mast arm controlling northbound Brea Canyon Road must be changed to provide programmed visibility indications, so these signals are not confused with signals at the project site entrance to the south. 4. Signal System it will be r:scassaa.y to assure among the agencies involved at all three intersections, that the system proposed is �1 23 - i_;:�pleme,tedt traffic signal coordination is provid , and that during all appropriate hours to assure intersects -on "J include the blockage does not occur. These agencies weles County, and ci.ties of Diamond Bar and Walnut, Los Ang Cali rans . The timing plan prepared in this document would be acceptable, however, it can be anticipated that subse- uent timing studies may be necessatrafficnlAvels oaretknotn Center i opened anc. c t �llcil future with certainty. LEI �I Y CbKCLvsiaxs ° The proposed development of 49,915 square feet t f f , 15,000 square feet of Retail, and 10,550 square feet of fast d to food te 3,787 restaurant use is exPec and 906 PM Peak Hour t pJi1y trips, 426 AM Peak Hour trips, o The impact of the proposed project on the surrounding street system was found to be significant at Brea Canyon Road at SR 60 westbound ramps. orecasted ofon Brea on o The existing Oa and d at Colima Road care withinethe undesirable Road at SR ranges of Level E (Severe Congestion). o The level of tratfthefmainaaccess�r the site would require a traffic signal o Lycoming Street should be restriped at Brea Canyon Road to provide adequate level of service, if the site exit should be restricted to right -turns only, and access is also pro- vided directly from the site to Lycoming Street.' the o A traffic signal at the profect n d entrance operated feasible There will signal is adequately designed signal modificatior_s at also need to be various traffic ig. State Route 60 westbound on/off ramp and at Lycoming Street to provide for left -turn vehicles, signal coordination, programmed visibility signals at various locations. -24- IV APPENDIX - Intersection Capacity ut-ilizatioll Worksheets - TRA_NSYT 7F Link -Node Diagram - TIRMSYT 7F AM & PM peak hour result' -'3 IIITEREECTION C FaCITY UTILI%A.TIrN ai c.'; - ET c ---------------_ �tL'lv�l il_ tiv Clam .. n n t rt T". 6on lcu :_ritual F^�e�ent id: ti�iej l; a 1. CII' �• - F't Tn J.C'C E �, i S I 1111 01'1 FE" T Et1STIri5 TRAFFIC -------------- - -- I - , -------------------- Fr F�3F. Col ----- - �L- --i- - - - - -- - t- ----- ----- _- - --"IC-- -fiNT fj .�, El_ !; nd 1h !;a C - t.� kau riS '; I .1 CFJ kl. �jA liw v0 }yti D i+�, L'6; y5 tiv Clam .. n n t rt T". 6on lcu :_ritual F^�e�ent id: ti�iej l; a 1. CII' �• - F't Tn J.C'C EEC T :1 C'N —7 AC T, Ij 7 1 T ,:TION r z rr; PATE; 8-2-:-F T I Iv F E AIf, P U ------------------ T I T 1 N"'I T IC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- 9- ------------- iw r V C, - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- 37 c 0 2 A Fif C, CO 3 c- L9 L C. E- 4L 713 1 7 L C! IM C T n d i f I bya i I MTQ g6Q» UTILIZATION . 4JKeRI ) . DSces»:Rw ned R Rg;Gou2 S. j ps:@22; ) 2»!D G» 62 ---------------- jR\3235 osQ3 TRAFFIC S32\ cG l 11 . \ _ --------------------- ---�------ ( _ R e# 9R. I 3 gJ 9R. \ \ G \} 2 2 K «: //- \ \- --- --- -- / /-��} \\ /t /\� 0 :z E 2 \ . E Et v . E « » z © - E .» / / ! 2: S l E\ J E\ 1 . C 2 g g e - 4 9 # 017 » . E � \ R9 .3 cS ! «52gRRt c2 y:5«3e! \\ g;2R5e! E2 D"a9ce� 62 . E J5 2 0 . Eu ETR C G / Critical movs ReuuR Gat J - », ApPI , ii T•r Cc; i sO!j .... �i`.T' 11T 71 Ai l'J 11 .�J :.a A E ------------------ 5C-FLrSDP;'�-_ i^e 14 caiave ^.t iC�ntified b;. 1, t.� - tl.t FrF?ica? .31 -i�.n. �...� '+t^3.'s.':'i'r "['-. t, .?:^I'•n w �;Y;':' 'S .•."C'N'...-.a•.'t'::.•y%4"..�.*.'a.J�✓.'A,."L§T}.5�,,Mf�.YW 3144aE Y[.'.�,..t�^.+: ..t :.,« EflSTINIJ TP 4` F "d------ Na, - ---------------------Ai peak tt r='1! AM L=.n_s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - --- -- - -- -- - - - -- ---- NG u4 37 0 it `vL I t - pj 4n E- Ii 1 „1 - �;, Q ET iL - 0,1 ' c 0, o, i^e 14 caiave ^.t iC�ntified b;. 1, t.� - tl.t FrF?ica? .31 -i�.n. �...� '+t^3.'s.':'i'r "['-. t, .?:^I'•n w �;Y;':' 'S .•."C'N'...-.a•.'t'::.•y%4"..�.*.'a.J�✓.'A,."L§T}.5�,,Mf�.YW 3144aE Y[.'.�,..t�^.+: ..t :.,« INT :� t, -Y �ITILIZAT!O'! t ER HC T I C,� :N I I'T z n R d 't ---------------- E'.' I ST S, PR 0 J E C -------------------- --------------------- I -------Fr C r i ------- ----- ----- ---- ------ 7-, cl 0 F. It 1 EL PA E T N 0 c', C, 0.62 i. L nt 0 el ICU 1.^" Crit i 1 Pi042 P Iu l{IEbv a -As Sm Im 3w. 3n CAP4.'r I P U I ILI P, E T sy T a C, 0r f;7 -F3 OAT cE T 1 :"71: '.7. ----------------- SIX EXISM"G TF,''AFFE -------------------- - -------- ------------ F.fl: c ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - ----- 12 1.12 N 2, rj ol 12 T C, 0 0 c UL Lid 1E= 0.11 11 C, 1 0. S C 1.1, P.) I e 11, v,,._ E o ro o n 0 ri i f -d bv ti a . iNTEnSECT C1 �: - 4!r .CSE r•-�CS.ECTiC,N :'°d [.a".vnG Pd DATE, E2 - TIME: PM PE f Ki -'a --------------- i ING------------ -------------------- !rr t :ve n9. _ ---- ------ ----- ---i - ----- ,, 1 v _, ' »iii 'ice _ NA .41 E 01 ICU E i. q0 vE. by 3 1. iC I; ':�-RHCT ION T TV I -,! T 14 D4TE: ------ I ------------------ F'� -------------------- ---------------------- ---- ---- ------- 7 ;3 i U fJ C. C, F, ri T i :d``1 ` Va GUIDELINES F07 USING TRANSYT 7F TIMING PLANS 5 This information will assist persons with experience in program- ming signal systems to obtain settings from TRANSYT 7F output. t TRANSYT 7F reference manuals should be consulted for a more complete analysis of the output. The first part of the output report contains input data. There is about one page for each intersection in the system, plus a table input by BDI indicating turning movements and volumes. This report is not required for setting and system timing, but it contains information useful in understanding subsequent reports. Each traffic movement is identified by a link number and each intersection is identified by node number. Link 502 represents Phase 2 at Node 5, for example. A table at the head of the link list indicates the phase number (NEMA 1-8) for each through or left -turn phase plus the traffic volume and direction. This table may assist in correctly identifying links in later list- ings. After the intersection list, is a performance table. The right two columns include the link numbers and their splits in seconds, however, split information is more complete in the subsequent report. The report beginning "TRANSYT 7F Signal -Controller Settings" provides all information for signal timing including cycle le_zgth, offsets, and splits. This report is usually near the middle of the output report. The cycle length indicated on the top of each page is the opti- mized cycle length. The signal system must be programmable to provide a program of offsets and splits for this cycle length. TRANSYT 7F calculates splits for fixed time equipment. Most agencies have systems based upon semi -actuated control. For these systems, splits for cross streets must usually be long enough to cover pedestrian crossings, while left -turn splits can be input higher than the TRANSYT 7F values except at congested locations. This allows the left -turn to "gap out" most of the time. Most signal systems define the start of green as the offset input, but TRANSYT runs prepared by BDI normally indicate the offset at the end of main street yellow. The offset for input into the system should be calculated by the user by subtracting from the TRANSYT offset the main street split input into the system. This calculation and approach is the simplest way to account for typically early returns to main street green for actuated controllers. 141 mR ITSY' w e ften pro :•ides very short green intervals for left - turn signals. Any Left -turn phase programmed for less than 8 seconds of cYreen should be monitored closely upon implementation. Please feel free -to contact Rock Miller at BDI if you require filrcher alssistanc.e in J_mple*rnernting the TRA NSYT 7F timi-g plans. 2) + COMMENT:TiME PERIOD: Ai I TRAN5YT-7F--TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM OFTIMIZATIl3N PROGP,AM- RELEASE'S OCT08ER 1988 VERSICN 2, FO?ISCRED B'(; DEGELOPEU PY. S FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT A11D ROAD RESEARCH LA.SORAT• OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED Y,IVGDO1' • TRANSFOF'TATiON RcSEAR;H CENTE:- x UNIVERSITY OF FLDP.I DATE OF RUN: 11127109 START TIME OF RUN: It., 2:20 _rd ------------------------------------------------------ INPUT DATA REPORT FDR RUN 1 =;------------------------------------------------------ FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 E 7' 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 lE �_---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- LINE RUN TITLE CAPD " NO. TITLE 2) DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK NETWORK: CONTROL CARD SEC/ SECT LINE CARD MIN MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP OUTPUT INITIAL PERIOD SEC(0) SPD(0) ENGL(0) FNF 110. TYPE CYCLE CYCLE INCR. CYCLE NORMAL TIME ERTEN, PENALTY LEVEL TIMINGS LENnTH FERC(1) TiP'E(.1) METR,(l) DE'; 3) 1 85 85 0 3 2 2 2 -1 1 1 00 0 0 0 +++ 104 +++ WARNING + + THE SEC/STEP FACTOR IN FIELD 5 IS IGNORED IN A SINGLE CYCLE RUN. +++ 107 +++ WARNING + + A STOP PENALTY OF "-1' WILL RESULT IN AUTOMATIC , CALCULATION OF THE PI TO MINIMIZE FUEL CONSUMPTION. LINK, SPECIFIC DELAY OR STOP WEIGHTS ON CARD TYPE 37 & 30 WILL STIR 8E APPLIED, HOWEVER. +++ 110 +++ WARNING + + INITIAL TIMINGS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED IN FIELD 11. *: TP,ANSYT-1F WILL IGNORE ANY OFFSET AND VARIABLE -- INTERVAL VALUES CODED ON CARD TYPES IX AND 18. AN OPTIMIZATION RUN IS ESPECTED. 41 LINE CARD LIST OF NODES TO BE OPTIMIZED N0. TYPE 4) 2 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINKS HAVING SHARED STOPLINES LINE ........................ THIRD 5E ....................... CARD FIRST SET ........................ SECDND SET.. NO. TYPE 1TR.ANSYT-7F:DIAMOND BAP, --- BRE,A ROAD NETWORK PAGE 2 FIELDS; 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 lE 5) ---- -- - 7 403 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 418 C 0 0 404 414 0 0 0 0 0 L:,- L$tr;u X 1YS1t:'1 b _ F AIJ I.TS S(S;E E:IE*'NAL S'f EM FUEL VEI�:ICLE ORI E4 -DES G;_SL . � X CF SA " ii 4 4 "LAT I . FUEL VEHiCL` TYPE NODE YELLOW A. -L -PED SATFLOI? Sr'EE3 PIF FACTOR LENGTH TATION SPLITS 2 -CYC WEIGHT FATE COST CCC. 6) 10 2 4 1 1700 30 35 1019 25 0 85 25 40 100 125 1:C 7) COMMENT;fff}if{}.ffff{}f{iifi}i{}}{}{ff-ffiffffffffffffff 9) f COMMENT:Voda 2 Intersection: POMONA FREEWAY (WEST ON k CFF) / BREA CANYON P. 11) 4GON?ENT:Mov2?ent NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL NT VR. 12) f COMMENT:Link Suffix 5 2 12 1 6. 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 13) f CO'i'ENT:Volute 185 543 0 0 776 232 0 0 0 163 0 604 14) f CCMMENT:Length 10,' 550 250 250 ------------------- INTERSECTION 2 ------------------- CONTROL! EP TIMiIIG DATA LIi1E CARD NODE OFFSET/ I".TE VAL DURATICNS (SECS. OR PERCENT) ............................................. DOU-Lr NC. TYPE NO, YLD.PT. REF I`1T INTI I}IT2 111113 INT; INT5 INT6 INTI INT8 INT9 INTIG INTI1 CYCLE 15) 13 2 0 3 8 30 3 1 3 11 3 1 3 0 3 0 CONTROLLER TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CARD NODE INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT) ..................................................................... NO. TYPE NO. INT12 iNT13 INT14 INT15 IN16 INT17 INT 18 INT 19 INT20 INT21 INT22 INT23 INT24 IV72 16) 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHASE. TIMING DATA LINE CARD NODE START VARIAB. YELLOW ALL -RED MINIM. N0. TYPE NO. INTVL It1TVL INTVL INTVL SECS, LINKS MOVING IN -THIS PHASE ................................. TYPE 17) 21 2 1 2 3 4 26 202 205 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 1B) 22 2 5 6 7 8 8 207 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 19) 23 2 9 10 11 12 .8 205 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 LINK DATA . LINE CARD LINK LINY SAT. TOTAL MID -ELK. FIRST INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THI,"-.D IIIPUT LINY.... QUEUE NO, TYPE NO. LENGTH FLOH .VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. EPD/TT NO, VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT CAP. 20) 28 205 250 1800 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21) 28 202 550 3600 549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22) 28 206 250 3000 * 776 0 307 86 45 306 690 45 0 0 0 0 ITRANSYT-7F.DIA10ND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PAGE 3 FIELDS; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 Il 12 i3 14 15 16 23) 28 216 250 1800 232 0 307 50 45 306 180 45 0 0 0 0 2 ) 28 207 0 1800 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ) 28 214 0 1800 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25) * COMMENT:toes link leng sat vol aid 28) # COMMENT;Node 3 Intersection; PROTECT DRIVEWAY / BP.EA CAN1'01 F'D 30) f COMMENT:Moveaent NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER W'L WT WP, 31) f CUMMEHT:Link Suffix 5 2 12 1 6 15 3 8 18 7 4 14 32) . COMIENT:Voiuce 0 111!1 135 42 1095 0 0 0 0 176 6 INTERSECTION 3 ------------------ CONTROLLER TIMING DATA y 1114F _ CARD NODE E OFFSET/ 1."TERVAL DURATIONS (SECS, OR PERCENT) ...................... D'C,B!-c NO Ti Z N3. 'YLD,f'i. RE INT il;i1 1NTZ INT3 I117� I'r;TS INtT6 IN?1 INTB INT9 1NT10 IST 11 CYCLE ` 34) 13 3 0 7 0 18 3 1 3 11 3 1 3 8 3 } CONTPOLLER TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CAPD N13DE INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT) .............................................., .................... ND, TYPE NO. INT12 INT 13 INT14 I'IT15 INTi6 INT17 INT10 INT19 IN i20 INT21 INT 2: INT�3 I'(TZ4 INi'= 35) 18 3 1 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHASE TIMING DATA LINE CARD NODE START VARIAB. YELLOW ALL -RED MINIM. PH"SF NO. TYPE NO. INTVL INTVL INTVL INTVL SECS. LINKS MOVING I`i THIS PHASE ............................ Tyr:! 35) 21 3 1 2 3 4 .13 305 301 0 0 4 0 0 0 37) 22 3 5 6 7 8 8 302 306 312 0 0 0 0 0 38) 23 9 10 it 12 12 307 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 °5 LINK, DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT, TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK,.., SECOND INPUT LIN):.... THIRD INPUT LINK..,. E'_EU NO. TYPE 110. LENGTH FLOW VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO, VOL. SPD!TT CAP, 39) 28 302 250 3600 1107 0 202 480 45 214 550 45 0 0 C 40) 29 312 250 1800 136 0 202) 69 45 214 6» 45 0 0 0 0 41) 28 301 100 1800 42 0 405 42 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 42) 29 306 400 3600 1095 0 4iB 155 45 407 115 45 406 54n 45 ±; 43) 28 307 0 1800 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 41) 28 314 0 1900 36 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45) 4 COMMENT:coas link leng sat vol aid p 1TRANSYT-)F:DIAMOND PAP. --- BR.EA ROAD NETWORK PAGE FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 47) } COMMENT:Node 4 Intersection: LYCOMINS ST / BREA CANYON RD NR SL ST' SR EL ET EP. WL 1.'T WR, 49) COMMENT:Movement NL NT 50) } COMMENT:Link Suffix 5 2 12 1 b 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 51l { COMMENT:Volune 274 891 37 10 597 32 40 15 155 116 22 10 52) { COMMENT:Length 100 400 400 INTERSECTION 4 . ----- CONTROLLER TIMING DATA LINE CARD NODE OFFSET/ INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT) ............................................. DOUBLE NO. TYPE NO, YI_D.PT. REF INT INTI INT2 INT3 INTO INTS INT6 1NT7 iNTS INT9 INT10 1NTll CYCLE 53) 13 4 0 3 8 30 3 1 3 11 3 1 3 0 3 0 CONTROLLER TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CARD NODE INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT)..................................................................... NO. TYPE NO, INT12 INTt3 INT14 INT15 INT16 INT17 INT 18 'NT 19 INT20 INT21 INT22 INT23 1NT24 INT25 54) 18 4 1 n ^ _ LINK. DATA LINE CAPD LINK LINK SAT, TOTAL MID-BLK, FIRST INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIRD Pt°Ii-A LIN`'.... !E:E NO. TYPE NO. LENGTH FLO'n VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NC, MCL, SPD.i CA=. 63) 28 406 0 3600 687 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 64) 28 416 0 1800 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65) 28 403 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CAFD LINK ADD START 6REE11 ADJUST. FOURTH INPUT LIN`: OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES,.......... PE NO. TYPE N3. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR SNEAKERS NO, VOL. SFD;TT LINK 1 K LINK 2 X LINK 3 % MODEL 66) 29 403 0 0 1600 2 0 0 0 404 100 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT. TOTAL ell) -FLK. PHASE IIMINS DATA SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIPD INFUT LINK% — , OL UE h NO. LINE CARD' BODE START VAP.I.A3, YELLOW ALL -RED MINIM,. NO. VOL. SFO/TT NO. VOL, SPD/TT CAP. PHrSc w NO. TYPE .110, INTVL INTVL INTVL INTYL SECS. LINKS MOVING IN THIS PHASE ................ I................ TYPE h 55) 21 4 1 2 3 4 26 406 416 402 412 -401 0 0 0 0 56) 22 4 5 6 7 B 8 -403 408 4!8 -407 404 414 0 0 Ej .. 57) 23 4 9 i0 11 12 9 40S 42 4I2 0- 0 0 0 0 0 d LI1;E CARD LINK ADD START 6P,EEN ADJUST. LINK DATA (CONTINUED) FOURTH INPUT LINKOPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES............... PE£" NO. TYPE N[). LOST -TIME EXTENS. MFR. SNEAKERS NO, VOL, SPD/IT LINK 1 X LINK DATA LINK 3 X MODEL 70) 29 407 0 Lits CA20 LINK LINK SAT. TOTAL III K F,"5T IN 7` LI,,'V.... SECC,N I���UT LIN;.... TNIFO INPUT LINK..., 9UE_'= NO, TYPE NO, LENGTH FL"DW V0:_ V'C'.. NO, Vol_ SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT N0, VOLL. 510D/TT GAP. rt 59) 2S 405 100 1800 274 0 30' 274 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1c FLOW 59) 28 402 400 360:• 881 0 I10, 7.0 5 31 6 45 ol0 0 i., 60) 23 412 400 1800 37 0 302 37 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1f_: 3600 61) 28 401 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA (CON INUE 0) 0 0 73) # COMMENT:coaa link lenq sat voi cid LINE CARD LINK ADD START GREEN ADJUST. FOURTH INPUT 1'NK OPFOSI46 LINKS AND PERCENTAGES ............... FEry NO, TYPE NO. LOST -TIME EXTENS.•MFR SNEAKERS NO.' 'VOL. SPOITT LINK 1 x LINK 2 S LINK 3 Z MODEL WEIGHT MODIF WERS 62) 2? 401 0 0 1000 2 0 0 0 402 100 0 0 0 0 1TRANSYT-7F:DIAMOND FAP. --- BREA ROAD NETWORK FA''= ' i6 FIELDS: 1 ---- 2 ---- 3 ---- 4 ---- 5 ---- 6 ---- 7 ---- 8 9 ---- ---- 10 ---- 11 ---- 12 ---- 13 -- - 14 ---- i:; ---- ---- LINK. DATA LINE CAPD LINK LINK SAT, TOTAL MID-BLK, FIRST INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIRD Pt°Ii-A LIN`'.... !E:E NO. TYPE NO. LENGTH FLO'n VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NC, MCL, SPD.i CA=. 63) 28 406 0 3600 687 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 64) 28 416 0 1800 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65) 28 403 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CAFD LINK ADD START 6REE11 ADJUST. FOURTH INPUT LIN`: OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES,.......... PE NO. TYPE N3. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR SNEAKERS NO, VOL. SFD;TT LINK 1 K LINK 2 X LINK 3 % MODEL 66) 29 403 0 0 1600 2 0 0 0 404 100 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT. TOTAL ell) -FLK. FIPST [INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIPD INFUT LINK% — , OL UE h NO. TYPE NO. LEN6TH FLOW VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SFO/TT NO. VOL, SPD/TT CAP. 67) 28 409 0 3600 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68) 28 418 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 69) 2? 407 0 0 1!6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LI1;E CARD LINK ADD START 6P,EEN ADJUST. LINK DATA (CONTINUED) FOURTH INPUT LINKOPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES............... PE£" NO. TYPE N[). LOST -TIME EXTENS. MFR. SNEAKERS NO, VOL, SPD/IT LINK 1 X LINK 2 Z LINK 3 X MODEL 70) 29 407 0 0 1600 2 0 0 0 408 !00 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA R LItE, CARD LINK LINK SAT, TOTAL_ MID -ELK. FIRST INPUT LINK..., SECCIID INPUT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINK.... QUEUE NO. TYPE N1 LENGTH FLOW VOL, VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT I10, VOL. SPD/Tr CAP. " 71) 28 404 0 3600 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fis 72) 28 414 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73) # COMMENT:coaa link lenq sat voi cid ksDELAY WEIGHT MODIF WERS NO. TYPE CONY NO. NO. 110. NO. NO, NO. NO. N0. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO, N`;_ 74) 37 100 202 206 302 306 402 406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STOP PENALTY MODIFIERS LINE CARD STPEN LINK LINK LINY LINK LINK LIIIK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINk LINK LINK N9. T Y r' E CONY NO. NC. N0: NO. NU. NO. N9, NO, NO. N0, N0, 1U3. NO. 75) 38 100 202 206 302 306 402 406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ' GRAPH PLOT CARDS LINE CARL LINK LINK LIN; LINK -LINK LINK LINK LINK LUq+ LINK LINK LINK LIPIK LINK NO, TYFE NO. NL', 110. NO, 119, NO. N3. NO. NO, NO: NO. NO, NO, NO. 3:t 1 75) 40 202 206 302 305 402 406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITRANSYT-7:DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PATE 6 FIELDS: t ---- 2 ---- 3 4 5 - ---- ---- ---- 6 ---- 7 ---- 8 ---- 9 ---- 10 ---- 1t 12 ---- ---- 13 ---- 14 ---- 15 -- 16 ---- RUN CARD LINE CARD PI = NO. TYPE TYPE 77) 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- PROGRAM NOTE --- A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USING THE DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES. IF CAPD TYPE 4 WAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED. - --- PROGRAM NOTE --- NO ERRORS DETECTED, TRANSYT-7 PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING. IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED, --- PROGRAM NOTE --- THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS, INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, IF ANY, IN THIS RUN. --- PROGRAM NOTE --- THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 3 WARNING MESSAGES ISSUED IN THE ABOVE REPORT. 1DIAMOND BAR --- BR.EA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 7 OPTIMAL SETTINGS) <PERFOR.MANCE WITH NODE LINK FLOW SAT DEGREE TOTAL TOTAL -------- DELAY -------- AVERAGE UNIFORM MAX SACK QUEUE FUEL PHASE LINK NO. NO, FLOW OF SAT TRAVEL TIME UNIFOP?1 RANDOM TOTAL DELAY STOPS OF QUEUE CAPACITY COX -SUM LENGTH N0. a (VEH/H)(VEH/H) (I) (VEH-MI/H)(VEH-H/H) (VEH-H/H) (SEC/VEH) (VEH/H;1) (VEH/LK.)(VEHILK) (GA/H) (SEC) 2 202 549 3600 31 57.31 3,73 1.83 .03 1,87 12.2 295,4( 541) 8 44 5.35 46 202 2 205 185 1800 51 8.74 1.97 1.54 .14 1.68 32.7 157.9( 857) 4 10 2.45 21 205 2 206 716 3600 44 36.65 3,20 2.30 .08 2.33 11,1 314,6( 411) 3 20 6.98 46 206 2 207 169 1800 57 .00 1.65 1.46 .18 1.55 35.3 144,8( 861) 4 > 0 2.01 18 207 a 2 2!•1 604 1800 81 .00 4.55 3.67 .66 4.55 27.1 500.8( 831) 12 > 6.10 39 214 2 216 232 1800 26 10.9E .80 .53 ,02 .56 8.6 75.0( 321) 2 10 1.73 46 216 2 : 2514 MAX = 81 113.6; 15.95 11.35 1.34 12.69 19.2 1483.6( 59X) 24.61 PI = 20.3 3 301 42 1800 22 .78 .35 .32 .02 .33 29.7 25,8( 61%) 1 4 .45 13 301 3 302 1107 3000 dl 52,28 2,17 .91 .10 1.02 3.3 137.8( 187.) 5 20 5.03 60 302 3 306 1095 3600 37 83.01 1.33 .04 .06 .10 .3 11,6( 11) 2 32 3,06 73 3CS 3 307 136 1800 80 .00 2116 1.40 .76 2.15 57,1 121,3( 941) 3 > 0 2.28 12 307 3 312 136 1900 11 6,42 ,26 .11 .00 .11 3.0 25.4( 181) 1 10 .61 60 312 3 314 36 1900 21 .00 .35 34 )1 .35 35.5 31.0( 86x) 1 > 0 ,43 12 314 3 : 2552 MAX = 80 142,49 7.22 3.12 ,96 4.09 5,3 418.0( 161) 11.86 PI = 7.1 4 �••• - -- 4 401 10 0 4 .00 .01 .01 ..nn At c n, ISYSTE`I NIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LI 'S> 4 4;,3 40 0 29 .G0 .42 .39' .0;1 .42 37.8 35.4( 89Z) 1 ) 0 .50 9 403 DISTANCE 4 404 22 3500P 15 CO .23 .23 .00 .23 3;%.8 20.0( 91 Z) 1 ) 0 .28 9 04 -} 4 405 274 1800 86 5.11 3.58 2,21 1.26 3.45 45.5 271.7( 9137.) 6 16 6.14 19 �C5 4 406 687 3600 31 .CO 1.43 1,40 .03 1.43 7.5 287.1( 42Z) 7 ) 0 2.63 57 40' 4 407 116 0 83 C,0 2.11 1.19 .92 2.11 65.6 108.1( 93Z) 3 > 0 2.15 9 407 ` 4 408 15 2600P BO .00 .23 .16 .07 .23 54.7 14,0( 937) 4 ) 0 .24 9 4''2 4 419 3 Ig00 2 2.E,). t)7 Gi OC .01 9 3.4( 9 ) Q 16 .24 76 4C 4 414 10 4045 15 .00 .10 .10 .00 10 37.8 9.1( 91 Z) 404, 4045 13 9 4i4 4 416 3"t 1500 3 .0? 05 .05 07 .06 6.3 11.2( 35Z) 0 0 .10 57 4Ir 418 155 41i9S 9) 00 2.36 1.65 .71 2.36 5a.7 144.4 93 ) 408 40ES 2.52 9 413 4 2279 MAX = 9S 74,70 12.32 7.62 3.05 10.67 16.9 992.1( 441) 19.50 PI = 15. ISYSTE`I NIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LI 'S> NOTE: PERFORMANCE INDEX IS DEFINED A5: PI = DELAY + STOPS NO. 0, SIMULATIONS = 9 110, 0, LINKS = 132 ELAPSED TIME = 136.9 5EC. IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK j------------------------------------- TP.ANSYT-7 SIGNAL CONTROLLER SETTINGS 4 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------- NETWOP.K-WIDE SIGNAL TIMING DATA <3 ------------------------------- SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH = 85 SECONDS BASTER OFFSET REFERENCE LOCATI'll = INTERSECTION NO. 2 START OF INTERVAL 1, THIS INTERVAL IS OFFSET 63 SECONDS FF'Ci SYSTEM TIME BASE NETWORK INCLUDES ACTUATED SUGNAL - 60EEN TIMES ARE ESTIMATED. -------------------------------- INTERSECTION CONTROLLER SETTINGS s INTERSECTION2 ACTUATED - SPLITS OPT 'ED # ------------------------------------------------ CYCLE: ------------------------- ----- CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE C s�TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL TOTAL :._ DISTANCE TRAVEL UNIFORM RANDOM DELAY DELAY UNIFORM FUEL OPEP,ATINEr PERFORMANCE SPEED TRA4ELED TIME DELAY DELAY STOPS COf1SUM COST INDEX (VEH-MI/H) (VEH-H/H) (VER-H/H) (VEH-H!H) (VEH-H/H) (SEC/VEH) (VEH/H-Z) (6.A/H) (MI/H) 330.84 35.49 22.09 5.35 27.44 13.45 2898.7( 39Z) 54.98 195.25 43.26 16.69 CTOTALS> NOTE: PERFORMANCE INDEX IS DEFINED A5: PI = DELAY + STOPS NO. 0, SIMULATIONS = 9 110, 0, LINKS = 132 ELAPSED TIME = 136.9 5EC. IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK j------------------------------------- TP.ANSYT-7 SIGNAL CONTROLLER SETTINGS 4 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------- NETWOP.K-WIDE SIGNAL TIMING DATA <3 ------------------------------- SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH = 85 SECONDS BASTER OFFSET REFERENCE LOCATI'll = INTERSECTION NO. 2 START OF INTERVAL 1, THIS INTERVAL IS OFFSET 63 SECONDS FF'Ci SYSTEM TIME BASE NETWORK INCLUDES ACTUATED SUGNAL - 60EEN TIMES ARE ESTIMATED. -------------------------------- INTERSECTION CONTROLLER SETTINGS s INTERSECTION2 ACTUATED - SPLITS OPT 'ED # ------------------------------------------------ CYCLE: ------------------------- ----- CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE C ROUTE TITLE CARD Np. TITLE . 89) O[AtSQND BAR --- BREA RD -- TUIE SPACE D•tAGP,Ati A?1 ROUTE LINK LIST ?#E CARn LI?# '; PAIRS ALTER:'.'+TING EY DIRECTIG'.i NO, iYPE DOWN AND OF DOWN AND UP DO�IN AND OF DOWN AND UP DOWN AND UP DOWN AND U? D('a't AND UP li 81) 61 206 202 306 3G2 406 402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CYCLE: 8o SECONDS, 40 STEPS PhfiE _J 1DIAMOND BA;7 --- BREA ROAD NETWORK <TRANSYT-7F TIME SPACE DIh6RAMi ROUTE NO. I ROUTE TITLE: DIAMOND EAR --- BREA RD -- TIME SPACE DIAGRAM AM = 3 SEC/CHAR, DIST. SCALE = 25 F1/LINE iiNE AXIS IS IN: SEC TIME SCALE 6 7 8 q 10 i1 1 2 3 4 012345670941 ----- 5----------------------------------------------------- 10 ------------- VOCE 1234�6�8it}12345b7890t2,'}`673?i112345578901231567630123456789234557°''0123456783012345678?rJ12345679-- DIST---- t t t t t t t t i i t t t i t t t t t t t , t t t t t t 1•v. t t i t t t t t t t i t t t t t i i t t t t t t 0 FT t t 400 FT x ai 400 FT 4}}------- }}+}------- --------------------- t1 NODE 12345678901234567890123456769012345678901234567B901234567890123456199 �1234557848123456789912345678141234567690 DISTAvrE 1 2 3 4 5 6 +++ GREEN I14 DOWN DIRECTION 'A`IG. TIME DISPLACE"ENT: SCALE CONVERSIONS: GREEN 1 SPEED GREEN IN BOTH DIRECTIONS TINE/INCH = 3 } 10 (AT 10 CHAR/INCH) --- GREEN IN UP DIRECTION DISTJINCH = 25 + 6 (AT 6 LINES/INCH) }+{ RED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE 1E IDIANOND PAR --- PR.EA ROAD NETIORv, TERMINATION CARD LINE CARD N0. TYPE 0 0 82? 90 0 0 0 0 0 . --- PROGRAM NOTE --- END OF JOB'. 1 INTVL LENGTH(SEC): S 45 3 1 3 2 3 1 3 12 3 1 INTVL LENGTH (X); 9 52 4 1 4 2 4 -1 4 14 4 1 PIN SETTINGS (X): 10010 9 61 70 72 76 77 81 95 99 65 66 PHASE START (NO.); I NAP 2 ACT 3 ACT INTERVAL TYPE f V Y R F V Y R F V Y R SPLITS (SEC): 51 9 19 SPLITS (X): 66 11 23 •4� LINKS MC'YING 426 -403 405 416 408 402 402 418 412 412 -407 -401 404 414 YIELD FOINT = 79 SEC, 93 X; REFERENCED TO START OF INTERVAL NO. 3 !DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: S5 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 10 <TRANSYT-7F FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAMS) SYMBOL KEYS: FLOW PROFILE SYiiBDLS (VERTICAL AXIS IS IN VPH). I . ARRIVALS WHICH BUEUE, NORMALLY UN RED ON UNOPPOSED LINKS OR DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY OPPOSING FLOW ON OPPOSED LINKS DURING THE PERMITTED PHASE(S). S : DEPARTURES FROM BUEUE, NORMALLY AT THE SATURATION FLOW RATE FOR 'PROTECTED' LINKS, OR MAXIMUM FLOW RATE FOR PERMITTED, OPPOSED LINKS. 0 ; ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES ON GREEN, WHEN BELOW S'S OR I'S, THESE ARRIVALS JOIN THE BACK; OF THE QUEUE. TIME SCALE (VERTICAL AXIS): (BLANK) : PROTECTED GREEN INTERVALS OR UNOPPOSED MOVEMENTS. +' PERMITTED GREEN INTERVALS WITH OPPOSING TRAFFIC. 3 a RED INTERVALS. N : THE NUMBERS ACROSS THE BOTTOM ARE A, TIME SCALE IN UNITS OF STEPS. :'TOTE: TiiE FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAM SHOWS EFFECTIVE 6y'EEN ANO RED, NOT ACTUAL, OFFSETS ARE NOT ADJUSTED TO MASTER CONTROLLER IF ANY. IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: 65 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 11 LINK 202 MAX FLOW 3600 VEH/H PLT, INDEX .00 LINK, 206 MAX FLOW 3600 VEHIF PLT, INDEX .56 4000+ 4000+ SSS S355 SSS SSSS SS3 SSSS KM ' SSS SSSS 3000+ SES 3000+ SSEC 5 555 SSSS. SSSS SSSS S5S5 cccc 2000+ 5S5S ' SSSS SSSS 5SS5 SSSS } SSSS 7 S 000+ �bs SSSS �:COOOOOOL'D'JOI[i;IIIIIIIItIIIIIII0�J000G0C^0 COCOOOOODODOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO9CODOC+,DCD 'a:GOCOCOOQOQCOi[[[IIIIIIITIIIIIIIi0000000':000 i..3 7234567"'? 12345678901231467890123456703 123 ! LINK 302 MAX FLOW 3600 VEH/H PLT, INDEX .60 4000+ SS 5S 5S SS 0 3000+ 55 00 5S OQ SS 000 �S OCD SS 6000 ss 0000 2000+ s5 0000 SS 0000000 0000 SS GOOOQO00000 0000 SS 900000000000 0000 SSS 000000000600 000011 SSS 000000000000 00000 1000+ SSS 00000000000000 00000 SS5S09DDoo9DD000OO 000001 s5S5000000090000000090 0000011 :IIIIIIIIII1000SO00000009000000000 00000II1 ,�� :[III[IIIIIIOG0S000000QOOOQOQ00000 QOGOQO[Ii :IIIIIIII•III0000000000000000000CC00000QOOIII 1234567890123456739012345678901234567890123 [DIAMOND BAP. --- BREA ROAD NETWORK LINK, 402 MAX FLOW 2968 VEH;H PLT. INDEX .64 3000+ S S AnS 5 S 5 2250+ 0 S 0 SS DO 0 SS OO G ss CD oD MOO 99 5SOo0 1500+ 99 SSOODO Goo 0000000. ssOOG0 000 0000000000 550000 000 000000000000 S00000 0 000000000000000C': MUM 0 00000000000000001 MOOD 2000+ OD �= - 00 SSSSCO 000I SSSSCOD 0001 SSSS000 0001 SS50000 0 00"II SSSOOOO 100 + 00 00107 I S;;C-'''OO 000 0000Iil S3S00000 000 U10011I1 S5SOD000 0000 00C00fIIIfI1ItIiII1IIIII[OOSSO90"GO 0000 000007777]IIIIIIIIIIIIIII0000Q00000 :002000 00000117I1111111111111111 000110le0000 1234'- 670 LINK 305 MAX FLOW 3707 VEH/H FLT, INDEX .70 4000+ . 0 0 00 0 00 0 000 0 3000+ 000 OS 000 000 OGO 000 SCQO 000 . 5000 0000 0000 0000 2000+ 00000 0000 00000 GGGG 00000 0,00 00000 0000 000000 0000 DOOM 00000 1000+ OOCOOQO 00000 ODCOCOOOODOODOOCOCC00000000 00000 GOOQOOOOQ0000DOOOCOOOOCDOQO 00000 000000000000000000000000000 0900000 ODOGOOOOOOOOOOOo0Q0O000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000II }{{{ }}} 12345678901234567990(2345678°01234567930123 CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 12 LINK 406 MAX FLOW 3600 VEH/H PLT. INDEX .00 4000+ . 55 . S5S . SSS 555 3000+ SSSS 5555 SEES SSSS 5555 SHE 2000+ SSSS SSSS SSSS 5SS5 SSSS , CCCC `X I D DOOOQOOODOOOODODIII 5000000 SSSS 00D0C00000000000000IfIIl 5000000:IIIQOC!OCOOOCC0000000000000OOCOItiI1IItIII1I 000 00000000000000000III1IIS000000:III000000000000000000000000000[IIIIII111III :0000 0000000000000000011TI110000000 I[I000000C00000000000000000000[IIitIIII1ItI :000000 00000000000000000II1111OUu00^:IIIOUOOOCODOOOODG00000000aD000[IIIIiII1IIII Or12314 753 ,'� F -E7 _. 5 4 —73n 01 45 it 25 I_ :8 56 3. 254.. . �1�., 1:345`1GSU134�o1G90i��4.:�,0��,.=3Y 5189�1:.,i !DIAMOND BAP. --- BREA ROAD NETWORK, CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 13 5TE?5 `SSE 1: SYMBOL KEYS: FLOW PROFILE SYMBOLS (VERTICAL AXIS IS IN VPH). I : ARRIVALS WHICH QUEUE, NORMALLY ON RED ON UNOPPOSED LINKS OR DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY OPPOSING FLOW ON OPPOSED LINKS DURING THE PERMITTED PHASE(S). 5 : DEPARTURES FROM AUE.UE, NORMALLY AT THE SATURATION FLOW PATE FOR 'PROTECTED' LINKS, OR MAXIMUM FLOW PATE FOR PERMITTED, OPPOSED LINKS. 0 : ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES ON GREEN. WHEN BELOW 515 OR I'S, THESE ARRIVALS JOIN THE BACK OF THE QUEUE. TIME SCALE (VERTICAL AXIS): (BLANK) PROTECTED GREEN INTERNALS OR, UNOPPOSED MOVEMENTS. PERMITTED GREEN INTERVALS WITH OPPOSING TRAFFIC, RED INTERVALS. N ; THE NUMBERS ACROSS THE BOTTOM ARE A TIME SCALE IN UNITS OF STEPS. NOTE: THE FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAM SHOW^- EFFECTIVE GREEN AND RED, NOT ACTUAL. OFFSETS ARE NOT ADJUSTED TO M"STER CONTROLLER IF ANY. !DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK --- PROGRAM NOTE ---INPUT DATA REPORT FOR ROUTE REQUEST NO. I ROUTE SUMMARY DATA LINE CARO TSO TIME TIME DIST. FPD ROUTE PPD GOF NO. TYPE FLAG FLAG SCALE SCALE FLAG SUMMARY FLAG FLAG 78) 60 1 0 3 25 0 0 0 0 LINE N0. TITLE ROUTE TITLE CARD CYCLE: 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 14 0 0 0 0 ROUTE ORIENT. 0 0 �� /'7) DiAMOND BAR --- BREA RD--•Tl?,,E SPACE DIAGRAM AM � ROUTE LINK LIST x.: LINE CARD LINK PAIRS ALTERNATING BY DIRECT104 NO, TYPE DOWN AND UP DOWN AVE UP DOWN AND UP DOWN AND UP DOWN AND UP DOWN AND UP DOWN AND UP 80) 61 202 205 302 306 402 406 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) ]DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE; 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 15 (TRANSYT-7F TIME - SPACE DIA6P.AM> ROUTE NO. I ROUTE TITLE: DI0OND DAR --- BPEA RD --- TIME SPA=E DIAGRAM A" s s� TIME A113 IS IN; SE" TIMr SCA:_E = 3 SEC/rHAR, DIST. SCALE = 25 FTILINE 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 3 10 li NODE 12'S45e7E101?245679�',1234`,678 0 12345678°(}1'" `� 8`1''123'5678?012345578361'33!678901234 5 �.,4 578 0 '4` 23 c' °� 012 .b78901 ,56.8 D1STANCE 2 :--------------------I--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 FT 1 1 1 1 _ 3 4444---- 4444----- 4444---- 4444---- 250 FT 4 :44+++++++ 444++++++ 444++++++ X44+++++++ 650 FT NODE .1234561890(2345618°0]2345678?01234567890]234567890]2'34567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789412345678'?0 DISTANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i] SCALE CONVERSIONS: +++ GREEN IN DOWN DIRECTION AVG. TIME DISPLACEMENT: TIME/INCH = 3 } 10 (AT 10 CHAR/INCH) GREEN IN BOTH DIP,ECTIONS 147.73 / SPEED DIST/INCH = 25 4 6 (AT 6 LINES/INCH) --- GREEN IN UP DIRECTION 444 RED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS i IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE; 85 SECONDS, 43 STEPS PAGE 16 , LINE NO. CARD TYPE TERMINATION CAPD 81) 90 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 --- PROGRAM NOTE --- END OF JOB! - 1 0 2) COMMENT:TIME PERIOD: PM 1 TP.ANSYT-1F --TRAFFIC S 1 6 N A L SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION PR06P.AM RELEASE 6 OCTOBER 1988 VERSION 2. SPONSORED BY: DEVELOPED BY FEDERAL H16H'WAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT AN; ROAD RESEARCH LABORATOY. OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED KINGDOM AN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTS` UNIVERSITY OF FLOPIC DATE OF RUN: 11/27/89 START TIME OF PUN: 10:59:13 - INPUT DATA REPORT FOR RUN ------------------------------------------------------- 1 R FIELDS: ---- 1 2 3 4 5• 6 7� 8 9 10 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 11 12 13 14 15 15 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- LINE RUN TITLE CARD NO, TITLE 2) DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD'NETWOP.K NETWORK CONTROL CARD SEC/ SEC/ LINE CARD MIN MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP OUTPUT INITIAL PERIOD SEC(0) SF'D(0) EN8L(0) FNC NO. TYPE CYCLE CYCLE INCR, CYCLE NORMAL TIME EITEN, PENALTY LEVEL TIMINSS LENF�TH PERC,l) 'TINE(l) METR(l) DEQ:' 3) 1 80 BO 0 3 2 2 2 -1 1 1 60 0 0 0 r +++ 104 +++ WARNING + ead + THE SEC/STEP FACTOR, IN FIELD 5 IS IGNORED IN A SINGLE CYCLE RUN. +++•107 +++ WARNING + + A STOP PENALTY OF '-1' WILL RESULT IN AUTOMATIC CALCULATION OF THE P1 TO MINIMIZE FUEL CONSUMPTION. LINK SPECIFIC DELAY OR STOP WEIGHTS ON CARD TYPE 37 & 38 WILL STILL BE APPLIED, HOWEVER. +++ 110 +++ WARNING + + INITIAL TIMINGS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED IN FIELD 11. TP.ANSYT-7F WILL IGNORE ANY OFFSET AND VARIABLE INTERVAL VALUES CODED ON CAPD TYPES IX AND 18. AN OPTIMIZATION RUN IS EXPECTED. =l LINE CARD LIST OF NODES TO BE OPTIMIZED NO. TYPE 4) 2 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINKS HAVING SHARED STOPLINES LINE CARD FIRST SET ......................... SECOND SET........................ THIRD SET................... NO. TYPE 1TRANSYT-7F:DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PAGE 2 FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 10• 11 12 13 14 15 16 5) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 7 408 418 0 0 0 404 4 i 4 0 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 4 LINE CARD MASTER SYSTEM DEFAULTS SYSTEM EXTE't'.NAL SYSTEM FUEL VEHICLE OFTEN- DESIRED I OF SAT MEG INFLAT FUEL VEHI` 1O. TYPE MODE YELLOW ALL -RED SATFLOW SPED PDF FACTOR LENGTH TATION SPLITS 2 -CYC WEIGHT PATE COST O: 6) to 2 4 1 1700 30 35 100 25 0 85 25 40 100 125 1. 7) f CO'MENTI f}f}}ff}}}}}}fffif{fffffff{}}}}}fffff}f}ff}ff}} } 9) f COMMENT:Nvde 2 Irate*section: PONLINA FREEWAY (NEST ON k OFF) / BREA CANYON R .11) f COMrE'1T:i11oveNen16 NL NT 1i F. SL ST SR EL E( ER NL NT k N ' 121, f COM!ENT:Ling SuTfix t, 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 IS 7 4 14 14A3 f CO"i'ENT:Vote e 132 86- 0 805 294 d 0 0 553 1056 0 tJ 14) f CON'!ENT:Length 100 51'0 250 250 ,. ------------------ INTERSECTION 2 ------------- ' CONTROLLER TIMIN6 DATA LINE CARD NODE OFFSET/ INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS, OR PERCENT) ............................................. DO'2'_ ;r NO. TYPE NO. YLD.PT, REF INT INTI INT2 INT3 IN74 Th1T5 INt5 INTI INTB INTO, IINT iO INTi1 (:'`:L 15) 13 2 0 3 8 30 3 1 3 11 3 l 3 0 3 CONTROLLER TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CARD NODE INTERNAL DURATIONS (SECS. OF. PERCENT).................................................................... NO, TYPE NO, INT12 INTB INT14 INi15 INT16 INT 17 INTIS INT19 INT20 INT21 INT22 IRT23 1NT24 IN' ' 16) 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHASE TIMING DATA LINE CAPD MODE START VARIAB. YELLOW ALL -PEG MINIM. PNAS= NO. TYPE NO. INTVL INTVL INTVL INTVL SECS, LINKS MOVING IN THIS PHASE .............. ....... ....... ..... TYP: 17) 21 2 1 2 3 4 26 202 206 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 18) 22 2 5 6 7 6 15 207 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19) 23 2 9 10 11 12 8 205 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT. TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINK.... QUEUE RE NO. TYPE NO, LENGTH FLOW VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL. SPDITT CAP. 20) 28 205 250 1800 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21) 28 202 550 3600 867 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 22) 28 206 250 3600 805 0 307 86 45 306 690 45 0 0 0 0 1TRANSYT-7F:DIAMOND BAP. --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PAGE s" FIELDS: 1 2 --3- 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 li 12 13 14 15 16 23) 28 216 250 1800 290 ---- 0 307 50 45 306 ---- 180 45 ---- ---- 0 ---- 0 0 ---- 0 24) 25) 28 207 0 28 214 0 1800 559 1800 1056 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26) f COMMENT:co4® link leng sat vol Aid 28) ' f COMMENT:Node 3 Intersection: PROJECT DRIVEWAY I BREA CANYON RD 30) f COMMENT:Movement NL NT NP, Sl ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WP. 31) f COMMENT:Link Suffix 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 an 32) 4 COMMENT:Vuluae 0 1774 158 40 1340 0 0 0 0 137 0 36 INTERSECTION----y3 CONTROLLER TIMING DATA LINE CAPD NODE OFFSET/ INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS, OR PERCENT) ............................................. DOU9L' NO, YLD,PC, PEF I?'T INT! II!T2 i'dT3 I,' T4 INTS INT6 IN77 IrITa" IH T9 INT10 I1T11 Ci`CL 34) 13 3 0 7 3 18 3 1 7 11 3 l 3 8 3 CONTROLLER TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINO CARD NODE I'ITERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT)..................................................................... w N). Tl`PE t10. I("T12 INil3 1?T14 Ii',1i5 1!1716 INT17 IX11R INT 19 1NT^:0 1N721 INT22 i?1723 INT24 I:�T 35) 18 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - y PHIASE TIMING DATA LINE CARO NODE START VARIAB, YELLO� ALL-PED MINIM, PHASE NO, TYPE }d1 INTVL INTVL INT6'L INTVL SECS. LI �,5 pOV115 IV THIS P.HASE .......,> ........................ TYPE t 36) 21 3 1 2 3 4 B 305 301 0 0 0 0 0 0 E`_ 37) 22 3 5 6 7 8 12 302 306 312 0 0 0 0 0 38) 23 3 9 10 11 12 12 307 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 6- LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT. TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK.... 5EC0'dC IN°UT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINT'.... ELSE':" j NO, TYPE NO, LENGTH FLO4 VOL. VOL. NO, VOL. SPD/TT NO, VOL. SPD/TT NO. VOL, SPDiTT CSD. 39) 29 302 250 3600 1774 0 202 777 45 214 990 45 0 0 0 C 40) 28 312 250 1800 158 0 202 90 45 214 63 45 0 0 0 4 41) 28 301 100 1800 40 0 406 40 45 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 421 28 306 400 3600 1340 0 419 233 45 407 99 45 406 835 45 w 43) 28 307 0 1900 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 44) 28 314 0 1800 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45) f COMMENT:comm link lens sat vol mid 1TRANSYT-7F:DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PASE 4 FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 I5 16 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 47) i COMMENT:Node 4 Intersection: LYCOMING ST / BREA CANYON RD 49) { COMMENT:Movement NL NT NP, SL ST SP. EL ET ER. NL WT WR 50) t COMMENT:Link Suffix 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 6 18 7 4 14 51) # COMMENT:Volume 271 1514 133, 15 915 60 106 32 233 93 18 10 52) { ------------------ COMMENT:Lenoth 100 400 400 INTERSECTION 4 tl: CONTROLLER TIMING DATA LINE CARD NODE OFFSET/ INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT) .................................. .....:..... DOUBLE ,. NO. TYPE NO. •YLD.PT. P.EF INT INTI INT2 INT3 INTO INT5 INT6 INTI INTS INT9 INT10 INT11 CYCLE 53) 13 4 0 3 8 30 3 1 3 11 3 1 3 0 3 0 CONTROLLER. TIMING DATA (CONTINUED) LINE CAPD NODE INTERVAL DURATIONS (SECS. OR PERCENT)..................................................................... NO, TYPE NO. INT12 INT13 INT14 iNTlS 1NT16 INT17 INT18 INT19 INT20 INT21 INT22 INT23 INT24 INT2.1: n �° 54) 18 4 1• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK: LINK; SAT. TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK,.,, JA n INPUT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINK;,... B!J`c_!_ NO. TYPE LINE CARD NODE START VAPIAP, YELLOW ALL -RED MINIM. S=DiTT NO, VCL. SFDITT CA=. 63) 28 406 NO. TYPE NO, INTVL INIV'L INT'VL INTVL SECS, LINKS MOVING IN THIS PHASE ............................. 64 ) 28 TY.'_ 0 55) 21 4 1 2 3 4 25 41c 402 412 -401 406 0 0 0 0 c 56) 22 4 5 6 7 8 8 -403 408 418 -407 404 4114 0 0 57) 23 4 9 10 11 12 8 407 402 4112 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUST. •s FOURTH INPUT LINK OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES ............... PEP6 NO. TYPE NO. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR. SNEAKERS NO, VOL. SPD/TT LINK, 1 X LINK; 2 Z LINK: 3 1 MO^EL 66) LINK DATA 403 0 0 1600 2 0 -0 0 404 100 LINE CAPD LINK LINK SAI, TOTAL MID-BLK, FIRST INFUI L.INK.... SECOND INPUT LIQ:;.... THIRD INPUI LINK.... F'_TE - NO. TYPE NU. LEN07H FLOW VOL. VOL, PC. VOL. SPU/TT NO. VOL. SPGITT N0, VOL, SPD/TT C r THIRD 58) 29 4''5 10!1 1500 271 0 •302 2l i VOL VOL. NO. VOL. SPDITT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO, VOL. 59) 23 402 400 3600 1514 0 3(12 1470 45 314 36 45 0 0 0 1` a� so) 28 412 400 1200 133 0 302 133, 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1_ 0 61) Zia 401 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i t LINE CARD LINK ADD START GREEN ADJUST. LINK DATA (CONTINUED) FOURTH INPUT LINK OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES ............... PER! NO, �w NO. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR SNEAKERS NO. VOL. SPD/TT LINK I LINK. DATA (CONTINUED) LINK 2 x LINK 3 IMODEL 70) 23 LINE CARD LINK ADD START GREEN ADJUST. 408 FOURTH INPUT LINK OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENJAGES............... 0 F_= N0. TYPE NO. LOST-Tlt'E EXTENS. ;IFR SNEAKERS NO. VOL, SPO/TT LINK I I LINK 2 X LINK 3 LINE 62) 29 401 0 0 1600 2 0 0 0 402 100 0 0 0 0 r TYPE iTRANSYT-7F:DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT N0, VOL. SPG/TT NO, VOL. PA E 5 71) 72) 28 28 404 414 0 0 3600 0 22 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73) FIELCS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 13 LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK: LINK; SAT. TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK,.,, SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINK;,... B!J`c_!_ NO. TYPE NO. LENGTH FLOW VOL. VOL. '0 NO, VOL. SFD,'TT NO. VOL. S=DiTT NO, VCL. SFDITT CA=. 63) 28 406 0 3600 6S7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 ) 28 416 0 1600 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 C 65) 28 403 0 0 4n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LINK; DATA (CONTINUED) '.. LINE CARD LINK ADD START GREEN ADJUST. FOURTH INPUT LINK OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES ............... PEP6 NO. TYPE NO. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR. SNEAKERS NO, VOL. SPD/TT LINK, 1 X LINK; 2 Z LINK: 3 1 MO^EL 66) 29 403 0 0 1600 2 0 -0 0 404 100 0 0 0 0 0 LINK DATA LINE CARD LINK LINK SAT, TOTAL MID-BLK. FIRST INPUT LINK.... SECOND INPUT LINK.... THIRD INPUT LINK.... QUEUE NO. TYPE NO. LENGTH FLOW VOL VOL. NO. VOL. SPDITT NO. VOL. SPD/TT NO, VOL. SPD/TT CAP. 67) 28 408 . 0 3600 15 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 0 ffm68) 29 418 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 69) 28 407 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i t LINE CARD LINK ADD START GREEN ADJUST. LINK DATA (CONTINUED) FOURTH INPUT LINK OPPOSING LINKS AND PERCENTAGES ............... PER! NO, TYPE NO. LOST -TIME EXTENS, MFR SNEAKERS NO. VOL. SPD/TT LINK I I LINK 2 x LINK 3 IMODEL 70) 23 407 0 0 1600 2 0 0 0 408 100 0 0 0 0 0 } LINK DATA LINE CAPD LINK. LINK; SAT. TOTAL MID -ALK, FIRST INPUT LINK.,,. SECOND INPUT LINK.,,. THIRD INPUT LINK.... QUEUE NO. TYPE NO. LENGTH FLOW VOL. VOL. NO. VOL. SPD/TT N0, VOL. SPG/TT NO, VOL. SPD/TT CSP, 71) 72) 28 28 404 414 0 0 3600 0 22 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73) } COMMENT:comm link leng sat vol Aid .0 MAXIMUM BACK OF QUEUE CAPACITY COEFFICIENTS NO. T'iPE (X) NO NO. NO. Na. NO. NO.. NO. NO. RD, NO, N0. NO. NO. t' 74) 34 60 302 306 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G DELAY WEI6AT MODIFIERS LINE CARD WGHT . LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK L .. tij. V4_ T,. t �I' CO`,� 1f t J. NG. IiO, N n0. I!C. ;!+?. 1 1O, NO. N0. ..C. i� t NO. iu 'N . t. 75) 37 100 206 306 302 406 402 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 STOP PENALTY MODIFIERS LI'+E C:1RD STPE111 LINK Li''Y LIN", LINK L1,7K LINK LINK LINT; LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK LI N0. TYPE 'CONY NO. NC. NO. NU, NO. N). NO, 1110, NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. 75) 31 100 205 305 302 406 402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITRANSYT-7F:C-IANOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK PASE 6 FIELDS; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11. 12 13 14 15 15 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ws GRAPH PLOT CA`'➢S LINE CARD LINK LINK LINK LINK LIN,' LINK LINT; LINK L14K LINK LINK LINK LINK LINK NO, TYFE N3. NO. NO. NO. NO. NU. NU, t10. NO. NO. NO. N0, NO. NO. 771) 40 206 202 306 302 406 402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RUN CARD 'r LINE CARD PI NO, TYPE TYPE 78) 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- PROGRAM NOTE --- A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USINf3 THE 4'"! DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES. IF CARD TYPE 4 HAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED. --- PROGRAM NOTE --- NO ERRORS DETECTE➢, TRA!15'fT-7F PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING. IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED. -- PROGRAM NOTE --- THERE APE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS, INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, 1F ANY, IN THIS RUN. --- PROGRAM NOTE --- THERE HERE A TOTAL OF 3 WARNING MESSAGES ISSUED IN THE ABOVE REPORT. iDIAMOND BAP, --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: EO SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE 7 (PERFORMANCE WITH OPTIMAL SETTINGS> NODE LINK FLO14 SAT DEGREE TOTAL TOTAL -------- DELAY -------- AVEI'AGE UNIFORtI MAX BACK QUEUE FUEL PHASE LINK N0, NO, FLOW OF SAT T?AVE?- TIME UNIFORM RANDOM TOTAL DELAY STOPS OF 91JEUE CAPACITY CONSUM LENGTH NO. (VEHiLl)('JEHill) (K) (VEH-MI/H)(VEH-H/H) (VEH-HIH) (SEC/VER) (YFH/H;V ('1EHILK)(VEH/LK) t A;N) (SEC) 2 202 867 80 90.51 10.06 6.22 .91 7.03 29.2 757.4( 871) 17 44 13.02 28 202 2 205 .3600 132 1900 65 6,23 1.75 1.'t5 .30 i.55 42.2 122.2( 93X) 3 4 2.06 13 205 2 206 805 3600 75 38.02 6.65 5.27 .54 5,81 26.0 695.2( 85X) 17 20 14.34 28 206 2 207 558 1800 71 .00 3.15 2.72 .43 3.15 20.3 415.7( 751) 10 > 0 4.60 39 207 2 214 - 1056 1800 98f .00 11.26 4.54 6.72 11.26 38.4 932.0( 881) 22 > 0 13.40 52 214 2 216 290 1800 54 13.10 2.43 2.04 .16 2.19 27.2 222.9( 771) 5 10 4.89 28 215 2 : 3108 MAX = 98* 148.45 35.37 22.03 8,95 30.99 30.1 3145.4( 85X) 52.31 PI = 46.5 3 301 40 1800 44 .75 .46 .35 .09 .44 39.6 38.8( 971) 1 4 .59 8 301 3 202 177'4 3600 70 93,78 4116 1.94 .4'' 2.31 4.7 - 1. 33X) 15 > IIC 12.04 60 302 3 306 1340 3600 47 101,53 3.03 .59 .10 .7° 2,1 3:0,9(237 9 19 7.93 68 3C 3 307 137 1800 76 .00 1.92 1.33 .58 1.92 50.1 1?7.nr (117) 7 (SYSTEM AIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LINKS) TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL TOTAL DISTANCE TRAVEL UNIFORM RANDOM DELAY DELAY UNIFORM FUEL OPERATING PERFORMANCE SPEED TRAVELED TIME DELAY DELAY STOPS 3 3l4 36 1900 20 100 ,35 .33 01 .35 a4.5 31. EE7) I > 0 43 3 : 3485 MAX = 76 193.56 10.19 4.72 1.20 5.92 6.1 1128.(( 3 27) 23.84 PI =. 28.. 4 461 10 0 8 .00 .03 .03 .00 .03 10.3 6.6( 667) 0 0 06 4? 4 4 402 15`4 36i:n 51 114.77 2.67 Ol 13 .14 .3 2,6' 017) C 1F. 4.06 7.0 _ 4 4(' 40 0 00 37 .25 .02 37 32.9 34.1( E5Y) i > 0 .46 1:) »`: a" 4 er;4 0,:^ 12 .09 .21 .20 .00 .21 33.1 1912( E8') 1 0 .26 1:1 4;'- 4 4n" ''?1 1890 71 5.05 2.521.33 d2 2.4I 32 1 223.1( E2'.) 6 16 4.76 21 4^= 4 405 6 7 3500 34- 0;) 1.75 1,70 .04 1,75 9.2 327.6( 421,) 8 > 0 3.03 49 --Ot 4 407 t!6 0 67 .0) 1140, 1.07 .33 1.40 43.5 105.9( 92X) 2 > 0 1.62 10 407 4 408 15 3600P 63 00 .17 15 .02 .17 40.5 13.?( 937) 4 > 0 .20 10 4 412 133 1800 9 10.08 .22 .n0 .00 .00 .1 C( OX) 0 16 .35 70 412 .� 4 4.4 10 4.45 ' i 2 .0 0 .0^ .09 � .'0 .0 9 33.7 S.Ei 9 ) �r7 410„ � 40» .12 i 0 4i4 � 4 4 1 S 32 1600 3 .00 .07 .07 .O�) .07 7.7 12.9( 407) 0 0� 12 4'? 416 4 418 155 400S 53 ,00 1.75 1.50 .24 1.75 40.5 143.7f 93X) 409 4085 2.07 1C 41'3 A 4 3005 MA:(= 11 129.91 11.25 7.16 1.22 8.39 10.0 899.4( 30X) 17.16 PI = 12.7 (SYSTEM AIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LINKS) TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL TOTAL DISTANCE TRAVEL UNIFORM RANDOM DELAY DELAY UNIFORM FUEL OPERATING PERFORMANCE SPEED TRAVELED TIME DELAY DELAY STOPS CONSUM COST INDEX (VEH-MI14l) (VEH-HIN) (VEH-HIP) (VEH-H/H) (VEH-HIH) (SECIVEH) (VEH/H-1;) (6A/H) (MIiH) 471.92 56.81 33.92 11.3,E 45.29 15.39 5172.9( 5171) 93.31 NOTE: PERFORMANCE INDEX IS DEFINED AS: PI = DELAY + STCPS + SPILLOVER PENALTY NO. OF SIMULATIONS = 10 NO. OF LINKS = 143 ELAPSED TIME = 128,5 SEC. 1DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK ------------------------------------- TRANSYT-7F SIGNAL CONTROLLER SETT/NGS -------------------------------------- ------------------------------- NETWOP,K-NIDE SIGNAL TIMING DA1A ------------------------------- SYSTEr CYCLE LENGTH = 80 SECONDS MASTER OFFSET REFERENCE LOCATION = INTEPSECTION NO, 2 START OF INTERVAL 1, THIS INTERVAL IS OFFSET 44 SECONDS FROM SYSTEM TIME BASE NETWORK INCLUDES ACTUATED SIGNAL - GREEN TIMES ARE ESTIMATED. -------------------------------- INTERSECTION CONTRULLER SETTINGS -------------------------------- 333.05 E8.18 13.76 (TOTALS) CYCLE: EO SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE PIN 5ETTINE5 (ti): 100/0 10 55 59 60 64 68 72 73 77 95 99 PHASE START (NO.): 1 NAP 2 ACT 3 ACT • INTERVAL TYPE F V Y P. F V• Y P. F V Y R SPLITS (SEC): 49 10 21. SPLITS (X): 60 13 27 LINKS MOVING 416 —403 405 402 408 402 �1 412 418 412 -401 -407 40,0 40*T 4114 • ,ra YIELD POINT = 37 SEC. 46 Z, REFERENCED TO START OF INTERVAL N0. 3 +++ 135 +++ WARNING + ' + THE YIELD POINT FALLS WITHIN 17 OF AN INTERVAL CHANGE POINT AT THE START OF INTERVAL NO 3. ' IDIAMOND BAP. --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE IC �x (TRANSYT-7F FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAMS) SYMBOL KEYS: FLOW PROFILE SYMPOL5 (VERTICAL AXIS IS IN VPH). I : ARRIVALS bHICH QUEUE, NORMALLY ON RED ON UNOPPOSED LINKS OR DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY OPPOSING FLOW ON OPPOSED LINKS DURING THE PERMITTED PHASE(S). 5 : DEPARTURES FROM QUEUE, NORMALLY AT THE SATURATION FLOW RATE FOR "PROTECTED' LINKS, OR MAXIKUM FLOW PATE FOR PERMITTED, OPPOSED LINKS. ' D : ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES 011 GREEN. WHEN BELOW S'S OR I'S, THESE ARRIVALS JOIN THE BACK OF THE QUEUE. TIME SCALE (VERTICAL AXIS): (BLANK) PROTECTED GREEN INTERVALS OR UNOPPOSED MOVEMENTS, PERMITTED GREEN INTERVALS WITH OPPOSING TRAFFIC. + : RED INTERVALS. N : THE NUMBERS ACROSS THE DOTTOd ARE A TTIiE SCALE IN UNITS OF STEPS. NOTE: THE FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAM SHOWS EFFECTIVE GREEN AND RED, NOT ACTUAL. OFFSETS ARE NOT ADJUSTED TO MASTER, CONTROLLER, IF ANY. IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE 11 LINK 206 MAX FLOW 3600 VEH/H PLT. INDEX .74 LINK 202 MAX FLOW 3600 VER/4 PLT. INDEX .00 4000+ 40pp+ • SSS5S5SS SSS5SSS5 SS55SSSS SS55SS55 �� 55SSS5�S S5SS5SS5S SSSSSSSS S55SS5S55 3000+ x S5S5S5SS S�SSSCSS 3000+ S5SS55355 SJ55bSJJJ r 555SSS5S 55SS 000000000000G00Q0 0000000DOG 0 ivy"v* 3555 750* 000000000000000000 OOOOOC0000 0 SSSS 000000000000000000 00000c0000 0 OOIIIfIlIIi11IIIIIt00QOG00000000CQ0000Q0 000000000000000OU0 OOOOOOOOOOD00 :OOIIIIIII1I11IIIIII0000000DOQOc000000000 OOOUOUOOCOOOOOOUOOCCCOOOOQCOODOU 00II1IIIII111IIiIIID00000000000000000000 :0 a0a0o0OooJac000oDOGDa0000oo00DD0 :UG?I[[IIIIIIIIIIIII0000Oi100000000OOCG0GD :DG COOOOOL'OUDOCOO0000000UO0000Q0000 1234567690123456789012345678901234567890 123456789012345678901234-j6789012345676;0 Y x 4= i, iDIAMGND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK SYMBOL KEYS: FLOW PROFILE SYMBOLS (VERTICAL AXIS IS IN VPH). I : AR.R.IVALS WHICH QUEUE, NORMALLY ON RED ON UNOPPOSED LINKS OR DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY OPPOSING FLOW ON OPPOSED LINKS DURING THE PERMITTED PHASE(S), S DEPARTURES FROM QUEUE, NORMALLY AT THE SATURATION FLOW RATE FOR 'PROTECTED' LINKS, OR MAXIMUM FLOW RATE FOR PERMITTED, OPPOSED LINKS. 0 : ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES ON GREEN. WHEN BELOW S'S OR I'S, THESE ARRIVALS JOIN THE BACK OF THE QUEUE. TIME SCALE (VERTICAL AXIS): _ (BLANK) PROTECTED GREEN INTERVALS OR UNOPPOSED MOVEMENTS. PERMITTED GREEN INTERVALS WITH OPPOSING TRAFFIC. - } RED INTERVALS. N THE NUMBERS ACROSS THE BOTTOM ARE A TIME SCALE IN UNITS OF STEPS, s NOTE: THE FLOW PROFILE DIAGRAM SHOWS EFFECTIVE GREEN AND RED, NOT ACTUAL. OFFSETS ARE NOT ADJUSTED To MASTER CONTROLLER IF ANY. !DIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK -- PROGRAM NOTE ---INPUT DATA REPORT FOR ROUTE REQUEST N0. 1 ROUTE SUMMARY -DATA ' LINE CARD TSD. TIME TIME DIST. FPO ROUTE PPO GDF NO, TYPE FLAG FLAG SCALE SCALE FLAG SUMMARY FLAG FLAB 79) 60 1 0 3 25 0 0 0 0 0 CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, a0 STEP: P=EE 1 CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, 40 STEPS- PAEE 14 ROUTE CRIENr• 0 0 0 0 0 i+ > 5000+ I I I II II III w. 3750+ 11 ILI SS OOS 55S55SS5 SSSS SS gas 2000+ SS55s555 . SSSS US II 5S00005S5 555 OOD ODODOS ' SSSS I III 550000555 SSS 000 000005 I I I I I 50 OMSS 00005 ` SSSOOOO II[[III 5000OOSSS SMUG 0.00000 :I III[III[ 500000055 1250+ 5SSOOGOG IgCq+I IIIIIII1 000UOUa5S I ?' :1 11111 ? I ? GOODHUE 11 000000OGOOOali m i :I III[II(II 000000000. II :IIOCOO0000000 :II II`..jllt? OOOOODOCUOOOI II :I1 II:iiIlllt 0000000CQOCGI II ROAD NETWORK :ILI IIIi1IIIfILI G"GUGOGGOCCC 1 ?f LINK 406. MAX FLO!,' 2,600 VEH/H PLT. INCE! .00 1. 2 45S73J0_'2 J 167990I2 2 4 2Sc.IL3'i.,./u: 44t•� " LiN}, 306 VAX, FLOW 4807 VEH/H PLT, IHDCX 75 > 5000+ wj 4000+ I I I II II III w. 3750+ 11 ILI SS OOS OGGsS SSSS SS gas COOSS S5 ME OOOSS SSSS US DOOSS 555 OOD ODODOS ' SSSS 2500+ SSS 000 00000S SSS 000 000005 SES9000 00005 SSSOOOO MGM SMUG 0.00000 SSSOCOOG 000000 1250+ 5SSOOGOG 0000000 :110OS00000 0000900000000IIIIii :II00300000 0000000000000H IIIc :I1903000009 000000OGOOOali m i : I I 000000000 900980000000011 H I I :IIOCOO0000000 00000000000001HIII *fill* 123456;78901234567B9O1234567B901234567BS0 IDIAMOND BAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK LINK 406. MAX FLO!,' 2,600 VEH/H PLT. INCE! .00 wj 4000+ 5SSS55S5S 5S5SSSSSS 2000+ Ss5S555SS SSSSSSSSS SSSSSSS55 SSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSS " 1000+ SS5SS55SS :Iit[I[1fIIttIIIIII[IIIIDOOOOOOGCODOfIII? :II?iIIII]lII?liII1I1i1Ia00000000000IItli :IIIc?[[IilItItIIIiIIiII000G00CG0000[II1I :iI1I[I?IIII111TIIff?I?IUOG00GU00000?till ;?ILII(II[111?If[illltlfOt100000D0o00I[IfI 123 1673'' 90121-45 S: 789012345c79 012245E7890 LINK. 302 MAX FLUB 3500 VEH/H PLT. INDEX 3 4000+ SS�Ss�. SSSSSSS SSS55S55 0C S35SHES 000000 SSSSSSS 0040000 SSSSSSSS 0000c000 5?SS31SSS 00400000 S55SSS5 0000000O SSSSSSSS 00000000 5SSSSSSS OOGO00000 2000` S3-Ss553S OOOQOoOcC SSSSSSSS 000000000 . II[fI00000000a000004 ODOOOOCCUI :III?I10OODC000000 000 0000DOGOI :II[[(IGOOOOOGC00000000 0000000001 :1111110000000000000000O OCOCCOCOOI I 1000+11II(IOOCcO00000oa00000 OOCCUMOGIi I :IIIIII00000000000OGDOpp 0000000001I[ I .1111'1101000000000000.000 OCOOCOOOOH I I :IIII]IGCOO000C00a000a000 000000v00ItI I 111111 000OOo00000000aG0 0000000OCIIII I :IIIIlI0CC000G000G0000000pG00i;000CCIIiIIi 1234557890123456789012345678901234567390 CYCLE: EO SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE 12 LINK 402 "AX FLOW 2990 VEH/H PLT, ?NDtX .52 3000+ 000 000D 000000 a 000000 07000 000010 000000 0000000 MOOD 2250+ 0000000 0000050 COUGH 0000000 MUCH 0000000 00007000 00000000 S000600000 OCOODOGO 0000000000 00000000 15n0+ 000000000000 00000090 00000000000000 00000000 ' 0090000000000000 OOOOOOOCC nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnn SSSS 5555 5555 5555 3000+ SSSS STSG 5Ss5 SSSS SSSS . SSSS 2000+ SSSS SSSS 5SSS55S5S 5S5SSSSSS 2000+ Ss5S555SS SSSSSSSSS SSSSSSS55 SSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSS " 1000+ SS5SS55SS :Iit[I[1fIIttIIIIII[IIIIDOOOOOOGCODOfIII? :II?iIIII]lII?liII1I1i1Ia00000000000IItli :IIIc?[[IilItItIIIiIIiII000G00CG0000[II1I :iI1I[I?IIII111TIIff?I?IUOG00GU00000?till ;?ILII(II[111?If[illltlfOt100000D0o00I[IfI 123 1673'' 90121-45 S: 789012345c79 012245E7890 LINK. 302 MAX FLUB 3500 VEH/H PLT. INDEX 3 4000+ SS�Ss�. SSSSSSS SSS55S55 0C S35SHES 000000 SSSSSSS 0040000 SSSSSSSS 0000c000 5?SS31SSS 00400000 S55SSS5 0000000O SSSSSSSS 00000000 5SSSSSSS OOGO00000 2000` S3-Ss553S OOOQOoOcC SSSSSSSS 000000000 . II[fI00000000a000004 ODOOOOCCUI :III?I10OODC000000 000 0000DOGOI :II[[(IGOOOOOGC00000000 0000000001 :1111110000000000000000O OCOCCOCOOI I 1000+11II(IOOCcO00000oa00000 OOCCUMOGIi I :IIIIII00000000000OGDOpp 0000000001I[ I .1111'1101000000000000.000 OCOOCOOOOH I I :IIII]IGCOO000C00a000a000 000000v00ItI I 111111 000OOo00000000aG0 0000000OCIIII I :IIIIlI0CC000G000G0000000pG00i;000CCIIiIIi 1234557890123456789012345678901234567390 CYCLE: EO SECONDS, 40 STEPS PAGE 12 LINK 402 "AX FLOW 2990 VEH/H PLT, ?NDtX .52 3000+ 000 000D 000000 a 000000 07000 000010 000000 0000000 MOOD 2250+ 0000000 0000050 COUGH 0000000 MUCH 0000000 00007000 00000000 S000600000 OCOODOGO 0000000000 00000000 15n0+ 000000000000 00000090 00000000000000 00000000 ' 0090000000000000 OOOOOOOCC nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnn -------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION 2 ACTUATED - SPLITS OPTIMIZED ------------------------------------------------ w INTERVAL NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IttT4'L LENT (S:.C): 8 15 3 1 32 3 1 3 6 3 1 INTVL LENGTH (7.): 10 20 4 1 4 39 4 1 4 8 1 I Pi' S'TTII@4 (7); li!0'C 10 30 34 35 39 79 82 83 87 9_ 99 "F} rH6.S` START ('i:l,); 1 ?11 P 2 ACT 3 N:iP w,a Y R 4' Y s' F V Y R ,U LIN;: MOVI?f 202 20 20'; 206 214 214 216 v YIELD 001"T - 24 SEC, 30 %; P,EFERENCED TO STA. -.T OF INTERVAL NO. 3 THIS IS THE MASTER CONTROLLER. IDIANONO EAR --- BREA ROAD NETWORK s ------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION 3 ACTUATED - SPLITS OPTIMIZED y' ------------------------------------------------ INTERVAL NUMBER : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a- �u INTVL LENGTH(SEC): 3 IN 3 1 7 49 3 1 3 5M 3. 1 INTVL LENGTH (X): 4 1 4 1 9 61 4 1 4 6 4 1 PIN SETTINGS (X): 10010 4 5 9 10 19 80 64 85 89 95 99 PHASE START (NO.): 1 ACT 2 NAP 3 ACT INTERVAL TYPE F V Y R F V Y R F V Y P. SPLITS (SEC): 6 60 12 SPLITS (A): 10 75 15 L1NI's MOVING 306 302 307 301 306 314 312 YIELD POINT = 27 SEC. 28 x; REFERENCED TO START OF INTERVAL NO. 7 ------------------------------------------------ INTEP.SECTION 4 ACTUATED - SPLITS OPTIMIZED �~ ------------------------------------------------ INTERVAL NUMBER : 1 2 3 4 5 '6 7 8 9 10 11 12 INTV; LENGTH(SEC)': 8 37 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 14 3 1 CYCLE: 80 SECONDS, 40 STEPS P -EE 9 k-xhl bid NEGATIVE DECLARATION ZONE CHANGE 90-0036 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-440 EXPLANATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RESPONSES 1. Earth. (A.B.C.D.E.F.G) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Construction of the proposed project will a limited amount of grading and earthwork and disruption to soil conditions. The proposed grading will incrementally increase the potential for erosion due to wind and water during the construction. 2. Air. (A.B.C) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the project and the use that it will replace, the amount of dust generated will substantially decrease. The added generation of exhaust fumes as a result of the project will be largely offset by the improved efficiency of traffic flow on surface streets and the Brea Canyon Rd and Lycoming St. intersections. 3. Water. (B) ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The majority of the site is unpaved presently but the proposed project will establish a significant amount of impervious materials which will create drainage volumes to exceed current drainage volumes. 3. Water. (A,C,D,E,F,G,H,I) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Although drainage volume and patterns will be altered, the project will not cause an excess of current carrying capacities. Additionally, the project will not affect water resources in the area. 4. Plant Life. (A,B,C,D) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due the lack of existing natural plant life, the project will not have a negative effect on natural habitat but rather will introduce more plant species in the area through implementation of the landscape plan. 5. Animal Life. (A,B,C,D) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The proposed development will not impact animal life. Due to the urban nature and previous development, no endangered animal or species are located on the site. 6. Noise. (A,B) ITEMS CHECKED "NO or POSSIBLY" The possibility of the project creating an addition to the current noise levels produced chiefly form the SR 60 FRWY are very slight. The only perceived increase may occur chiefly during the short term of the construction and grading phase of the project. 7. Licht and Glare. ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The project will introduce new sources of light to the project site. The project will however not create any significant new light spillage offsite. 8. Land Use. ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The proposed project is a substantial intensification of the present land use. The zone change allows for the site to be developed to its highest and best use. 9. Natural Resources. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The project will not deplete any nonrenewable natural resources although electricity and water consumption will increase over present levels. 10. Risk of Upset. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The project does not propose the use of any hazardous materials. There will be compressed liquids used at the restaurants but the likelihood of explosions is virtually none. 11. Population. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the project, little or no impacts to the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population are anticipated. 12. Housing. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No additional demands for the creation of new housing is anticipated. 13. Transportation/Circulation. (A,B,D,F) ITEMS CHECKED "YES" The project proposed will significantly increase the number of trips beyond the current levels, the need for parking onsite, the number of hazards present to motor, vehicle, and pedestrian traffic, and present patterns of circulation will be altered. 13. Transportation/Circulation. (C,E) ITEMS CHECKED "NO" There will no substantial negative impact to the existing traffic systems or to waterborne, air, or rail traffic. Instead, with the implementation of the mitigation techniques, the existing traffic situation will maintain current levels of service or actually improve. 14. Public Services. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" Due to the nature of the project and the improvements provided by the applicant, the project will not interfere with the level of service maintained by the fire and sheriff departments, school or recreational facilities. 15. Energy. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The nature of the project is such that the demand for energy will not require the development of energy sources other than current sources. 16. Utilities. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No substantial alterations to existing utilities will be required to proceed with this project. 17. Human Health. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The scope of the project does not anticipate the use of any chemicals or equipment which might be injurious to the health and safety of resident or surrounding property owners. 18. Aesthetics. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The project will not obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public. 19. Recreation. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" The project will not create the need for, or adversely affect existing recreational facilities. 20. Cultural Resources. ITEMS CHECKED "NO" No impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with project development, due to the current development status of the site. MITIGATION MEASURES Noise Construction hours are limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. No construction will be allowed on weekends or federal holidays. The center is scheduled to operate from 6 a.m. to 1 a.m. with the exception of the Fairfield Inn which operates 24 hours per day. Light and Glare Non -glare producing glass will be implemented throughout the center for restaurant, retail, and the hotel uses. Also, an eight foot wall and 24" box trees will further reduce light spillage from the project into the residences to the north. Traf f is The traffic signal for State Route 60 off -ramp must be modified to provide a left turn phase for traffic turning onto the freeway and a right turn phase for traffic turning of the freeway, This improvement will provide for signal system operation and also improve the Level of Service to Level D. A third lane should be stripped southbound on Brea Canyon Road from the project entrance to the SR 60 ramp intersection. This lane would turn right onto the freeway westbound. The traffic signal existing at Brea Canyon and Lycoming St. must be modified to provide left turn signals for northbound and southbound. The level of traffic forecasted for the site would still require a traffic signal at the main access to allow left turns onto Brea Canyon Rd. I _ ►o66-lveme)}:TVMUDA "VWSEEN ".1 l - dobe 1isii,,/wV,Hvo j WaLwan a roadom we oiomm IAUV"W l3Nd) nd'id a Z U e e e r e w ri O O e n � f N ca Y cr C G " CL ¢ 6 E e m m e e worth Nj jm a da -� a Z U bb4-IN P\ - 4- 4 4 Ot-l-f ... S=,F 04 Wde -!E 18 17 2 1 121 20 -!E 18 17 16 15 1 14 13 22 7 8 9 IC 11 12 22 21 20 19 18 n 9 0 C m z 4 cn a 5 m ,r ,M n D i \ NEWS 0 A A z 7 ■ '-S'. 5'—O■ Er 9 1. 9 $-G' �� , - {M�e � . - fir` 3,_90 2'`6* I 1. Fit 2'`6* I 4 a -AA111ci MOtld 818181A ,tI e N .1.1 J W H O 2 N o� aW >dc W J W Z 0 N m J Q H W S -E _114 V'1 Y) r -t 1�1_1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 1990 The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar convened in a regular session at 7:00 p.m. in the Walnut Valley School District Board Meeting Room, 880 South Lemon Street, Walnut, California. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Grothe, Lin, Vice Chairman Harmony, and Chairman Schey ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS ALSO PRESENT: Bill Curley, City Attorney Ron Kranzer, City Engineer Jack Istik, Assistant City Engineer Dennis Tarango, Acting Planning Director Robert Searcy, Assistant Planning Director Dawn Anderson, Planning Technician Larry Weissman, Associate Planner Steve Koffroth, City Intern V. PUBLIC HEARING: b. Zone Change 90-0036 and Conditional Use Permit 89-440, A Zone Change from M -1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing - Development Program - Billboard Exclusion) to C1 -PD -BE (Restricted Business -Planned Development -Billboard Exclusion), and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 3 story hotel 135 room hotel, a 200 seat restaurant, a 70 seat fast food restaurant with drive through, two retail shop buildings totaling 21,000 square feet, and three signs in excess of six feet above grade. The site is located on the east side of Brea Canyon Road between Interstate 60 and Lycoming St. Diamond Bar, Ca. Mr. Tarango stated that he met with the applicant's traffic engineer, the City Engineer and Vice Chairman Harmony to discuss the mitigation measures. PUBLIC HEARING: Ken Spear stated that they have submitted those items requested by the Commission at the previous meeting. The applicants are also requesting that the easterly sign be increased from 75 square feet to 95 square feet. Staff has recommended deletion of the eastern sign replacing it with a wall sign. The applicants want to keep this sign due to its view from the 57 Freeway. The two pole signs are about 1000 feet apart. Mr. Kranzer recommended that the subject property provide for a possible future reciprocal ingress and egress. A system that includes the existing traffic signals at the on and off ramps of the 60 Freeway and Brea Canyon Road, Lycoming St. and Colima can be modified if deemed necessary as part of the system. Rock Miller, the applicant's engineer stated that it would not be difficult to tie all the signals together in that vicinity. Those in Favor. Joe Han, 826 1/2 Silver Fir, stated that he is pleased with the changes in the project. Chairman Schey indicated that the Commission has received letters from Lynn and Donald Briggs, 2350 Oakleaf Canyon, Walnut, and John Delripple, 21135 Lycoming St, Diamond Bar, stating that they are in favor of the project. They also received a petition from Claudia Yeager addressing the concern of privacy and requesting an eight foot high wall be approved to be constructed along Flood Control Channel. Those in Opposition. Don Schad, 1824 Shadedwood Road, Walnut, requested that the Commission keep the intensity of signs to -a minimum in order to keep the light pollution to a minimum. Joanne Rogan, 1144 S. Crofter, Walnut, stated that she opposes the project because she does not feel that the City needs another hotel. She would like to see assurance that there is a need for this additional hotel. She was concerned with the traffic issue. She was also concerned with the homeowners view of the proposed sign. Claudia Yeager is not in opposition of the project, but asked if a decision has been made as to the wall and if under ground wiring is proposed. Chairman Schey stated that this is standard. Public Hearing Closed. Harmony stated that he met with the engineers. Marriott provided the Commission with feasibility marketing study. Monday they met with 2 members of the traffic Commission, staff and the applicant's traffic engineer and went over the proposed changes to the intersection. The mitigating measures will keep the traffic from getting worse and will improve parts of the traffic coming off of Lycoming. City Traffic Engineer indicated that inclusion of a signal on Colima will make 3 lights linked together. The Traffic Engineer has added a left hand, turn north bound on Brea Canyon. The parking under the bridge will be eliminated and expanded in order to gain a left turn pocket at this location and doing the same on the other side in order to turn left onto Colima going south. This will result in linking all three intersections together. Chairman Schey asked Mr. Kranzer if it would be feasible, given the left turn pocket, to create a raised median. Mr. Kranzer stated that this would be feasible but would create a physical barrier restricting cars to turn into the sites along the street. He did not feel that this would be a problem. Requiring double lines might be implemented if there is a problem with cars entering into the pre-school parking lot. Mr. Kranzer watched the traffic at this intersection this morning -and only 1 car turned into this location. Mr. Tarango stated that an eight (8') foot wall might invite graffiti and suggested considering the possibility of integrating landscaping into this wall. Motion was made by Chairman Schey and seconded by Vice Chairman Harmony to approve the project subject to conditions listed by staff, the conditions of approval by the City Engineer including the Colima and Brea Canyon intersection signalization coordination, with consideration to a tie-in to the Colima and 60 east bound off - ramp signalization, extension of the turn pockets under the bridge, installation of an eight (8') foot wall and appropriate landscaping on the north boundary and limiting the applicant to one freeway sign, leaving this to the applicant's discretion to choose which sign they wish to delete. Mr. Burley stated that the resolution should reflect that the Conditional Use Permit approval is conditional and subject to the City Council approving the Change of Zone. Section 3C of the resolution needs to have added "provided that the City Council approve and adopt the recommended change of zone". At the end of the resolution, Section 6 would become 7 and add a section 6 "Conditional Use Permit approval is subject to and contingent upon final adoption of the Change of Zone". Motion was made by Chairman Schey and seconded by Vice Chairman Harmony to include this amendment and to include subject to issuance of Cal -trans permits. This did not to include the wall sign. MOTION CARRIED unanimously. AGENDA NO. - `' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 29, 1990 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager FROM: Ronald L. Kranzer, City Engineer t� SUBJECT: TRUCK ROUTES This matter was last heard by the City Council at their meeting of March 20, 1990, at which time they did consider the recommendation of the Traffic and Transportation Committee relating (see attached copy of that report). Due to the fact that Highway User Tax Funds were involved in the construction of some of Diamond Bar's major streets a very active noticing program had to be effected prior to adoption of weight restrictions hence the delay from the City Council original consideration to the date of the Public Hearing to consider adoption of the appropriate ordinance. At the meeting of March 20, 1990, concern was raised that the proposed restriction might have an adverse effect upon delivery trucks making more than one delivery in Diamond Bar, i.e. a produce truck making deliveries to various stores in Diamond Bar,on a given day and using the restricted major street for the most direct route rather returning to the Freeway or unrestricted streets. This certainly is not the intent of the restriction but it would be very difficult to provide the necessary language in the Ordinance not to mention the signing problems. It is felt though that this is a problem but could be resolved at the enforcement level. (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REV�E ED BY --- - ------------------------- ------------------- Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Manager City Attorney Sr. Accountant City Council - June 5, 1990 2 Truck Routes Subsequent to the notices in the papers regarding the proposed restrictions concern has been raised by citizens on how the restriction might effect the use of their recreation vehicles, many of which are over the 10,000 pound limitation. The answer to their concern is provided in the same exemption provided commercial vehicles making bonafide deliveries of goods and services. Once the ordinance is adopted perhaps an article could be placed in the City's newsletter advising of the restrictions and exemptions. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council introduce Ord. 1990, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING THE USE OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND BY ANY VEHICLE EXCEEDING A MAXIMUM GROSS WEIGHT OF TEN THOUSAND POUNDS, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, ESTABLISHING PENALTIES THEREFOR AND REPEALING CHAPTER 15.48 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED. Attachments: Report of March 13, 1990 Ordinance No. (1990) Notice of Public Hearing AGENDA NO.21— CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Capital Improvements Projects BACKGROUND: The City will soon be entering its second year of operation. It will be receiv- ing its full share of revenues as well as have the opportunity to complete the projects it inherited from the County. The Council during the public hearing will consider whether or not the attached Capital Projects are in compliance with the appropriate statutes that govern the City's adopted General Plan. The projects presented include: 1. Heritage Park Building Improvement In August 1989, the City Council applied for, and were successful in receiv- ing Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) from the Roberti/Z'berg Program for improvements to Heritage Park. The improvements are exempt from CEQA in as much as they are only a remodel and improvements to the existing structure. The City Council has authorized a match of an additional Forty Thousand Dol- lars ($40,000) from General Funds to enhance the improvements scheduled for Heritage Park during the forthcoming fiscal year. 2. Carlton J. Peterson Park - Improvement The Park and Recreation Commission, with the City Council's concurrence, has recommended that additional improvements be constructed at Carlton J. Peter- son Park. These improvements are consistent with the County of Los Angeles Resolution adopting a negative Declaration authorizing these additions. The additional improvements were not contained within the initial Park plans sub- mitted to the City from the County. Thirty-two Thousand Dollars ($32,000) from the General Fund has been authorized. Narrative continued on next page. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number Deficit: $ Revenue Source: REVIEWED BY: Robert L. Van Nort City Manager Andrew V. Arczynski City Attorney 1 Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant Capital Improvements Projects June 5 Agenda Page Two 3. Pathfinder Bridge The expansion of Pathfinder Bridge is presently being reviewed by the County of Los Angeles on behalf of the City of Diamond Bar. Initially this project was approved by the County of Los Angeles several years ago, with the plans having been signed off by the County in December, 1988. The delay was not environmen- tal, merely financial commitment to complete the project. During the past year, the Council developed a financing mechanism to fund and complete the project during the forthcoming 1990-91 fiscal year. Nine Hundred Ninety-two Thousand ($992,000) will be generated from the FAU and gas tax. 4. Grand Avenue The improvements to Grand Avenue are the result of settling a lawsuit with the County of San Bernardino. They are a partial solution to the mitigation neces- sary for the eventual opening of Grand Avenue. Funding for the Grand Avenue improvements will be provided by the County of San Bernardino. For the most part, the improvements will have been authorized during the 1989-90 fiscal year. However, the improvements at Grand/Montefino and Grand/Golden Springs will be authorized during the 1990-91 fiscal year. The projected cost for these imp- rovements is One Million, One Hundred Dollars ($1.1 M) and will be funded by the County of San Bernardino. SUMMARY: The initial Capital Projects that are before you have been developed for some time. They are a carryover from the County of Los Angeles and transferred to the City of Diamond Bar upon its incorporation. They are primarily funded by non -general funds by use of FAU, Prop. A, Gas Tax and Park Funds. During the forthcoming year, the City will be developing a five year Capital Improvement Program, not to be confused with projects, but a document where the City intends to proceed during the forthcoming five (5) year. RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff's recommendation that the City Council approve the Capital Pro- jects as presented. County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation `. 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SYLVAN GLEN COUNTY PARK -Y NEGATIVE DECLARATION (First Supervisorial District) I. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The project is the proposed development of Sylvan Glen County Park in the unincorporated community of Diamond Bar. The site is adjacent to the intersection of Golden Springs Drive and Sylvan Glen Road, near the Pomona (60) Freeway (see location map, Attachment A) . A Negative Declaration for the develop ,lent of Sylvan Glen County Park was adopted by the Board on April 29, 1986. This document addresses construction in two phases. The first phase was performed by the subdivider in partial fulfillment of park dedication requirements. This included the construction of a 45 -car parking lot, a cornfort- station, landscaping, and installation of utilities. The Conditional Use Permit for the park (Case No. 85-059-(11) was approved by Regional Planning on August 28, 1985. The second phase , .,of _ d.evelopment,. _ to., be performed- . by. the County, i-nclur.4.es the construction, of _two-_lighted,_ball__fields,._a...c.hildren's play area, security liuhting, boundary_ fencing_, _v�:aJktyzysJ. landscaping, and irrigation system modifications. II. FINDING CF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT Eased on the 2ttached Initial Study, conducted for the preparation of the environmental -document, it has been determined that the project will have no significant effect .upon the environment. Ill. MODIFICATION MEASURES The mitigation measures and/or conditions of the project's development are discussed in the initial Study. The Initial Study was prepared by the County Department of Parks and Recreation. If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this document, please contact Dorothea Park at (213) 736-2976. addresses developments _that.ar.e being -added _to Phase-H, _This .document which were not - covered in the previous Negative Declaration, including_ tile construction of a maintenance area, a _ lighted har_dccurt,__-a. joggi-ng_ oath with exercise stations, a group picnic shelter, and the installation of picnic_ furniture.` _. These additions to Phase , 11 -are the-_resuit, -o , cor�nu.ni-ty input: II. FINDING CF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT Eased on the 2ttached Initial Study, conducted for the preparation of the environmental -document, it has been determined that the project will have no significant effect .upon the environment. Ill. MODIFICATION MEASURES The mitigation measures and/or conditions of the project's development are discussed in the initial Study. The Initial Study was prepared by the County Department of Parks and Recreation. If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this document, please contact Dorothea Park at (213) 736-2976. County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SYLVAN GLEN COUNTY PARK INITIAL STUDY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The project is located in the unincorporated community of Diamond Sar in the First Supervisorial District. The site is adjacent to the intersection of Golden Springs Drive and Sylvan Glen Road, near the Pomona (60) Freeway (see location map, Attachment A) . The proposed project is to develop a 16 + acre park site which was dedicated to the County by the subdivider of the area. This dedication fulfilled County Code requirements for the provision of park land when developing residential housing. Regional Planning approved the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 85-059[1]) for this project on August 28, 1985. A previous Negative Declaration for the general development of the park was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 29, 1986. The development is planned for 9 + acres of the site, with the remaining 7 + acres to remain undeveloped and left in its natural state. The development is being completed in two phases. The first phase, completed by the subdivider, included construction of a comfort station, a parking lot for 45 vehicles, installation of utilities, and landscaping. The second phase, to be undertaken by the County, includes construction of two lighted ball fields, a children's play area, walkways, boundary fencing, security lighting, landscaping, and irrigation system modification. This document address developments to the the second phase of development which are Negative Declaration. These developments development plans due to requests by following: - 1 - park which will become part of not addressed in the original which were added to the the community, include the County of Los Angeles PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SYLVAN GLEN COUNTY PARK -IN1ITIAL STUDY- -Hardcourt: a multi-purpose asphalt area roughly 90x60 feet, large enough to accommodate one basketball court or one volleyball court, will be constructed. Two regulation basketball backboards will be installed and basketball court markings will be painted on the surface. Holes will be made in the court to accommodate volleyball net supports. -Hardcourt Lighting: each corner of the court will have two metal halide light fixtures of 1000 watts. These fixtures will be attached to a 26 -foot high galvanized steel pole, for a total height of 29 feet. The lights will automatically turn off at 10:00 p.m. -Maintenance Area: an 8x10 foot area for the storage of trash bins and other maintenance equipment. It will be enclosed by masonry block walls with a wrought iron gate, and will be located adjacent to the eastern edge of the parking lot. -Jogging Path: a 1 mile circular jogging path will be created along the perimeter of the developed portion of the park. -Exercise Stations: nine stations of par course exercise equipment will be installed along the jogging path. -Group Picnic Shelter: a covered area with picnic tables on a cement pad will be constructed to provide an area for group picnics and birthday parties. Approximately 50 people will be able to use the area at a time. -Picnic Furniture: individual picnic tables will be installed in various places in the park site. These developments will not affect the 7 + acres of the site which have been set aside to remain undeveloped and left in their natural state. - 2 - County of Los Angeles PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SYLVAN GLEN COUNTY PARK -INITIAL STUDY - 11. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The project conforms to the Los Angeles County General Plan, adopted on November 25, 1980, and to the Diamond Bar Community Plan, adopted on August 2, 1983. III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The 16 + acre park site includes approximately nine acres of flat land pro- posed for development as an active recreation area, and approximately seven acres of hillside to be I�Jt in its natural state. Perennial grasses and shrubs are predominant on the hillsides in and surrounding the park. The project site is set among a west -facing hillside area within the Puente Hills. The area drains toward the San Jose Creek Channel, approximately two miles west of the project area. The site offers views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north and hilltops to the south and east. IV. ENVIRON�IMENTAL IMPAC T -S Attached is a completed Environmental Impact Checklist to identify possible environmental effects. Those identified are explained in the Discussion section below. - 3 - z. ,a [7 7 iZ m � � !c �a D =m IJ I` I 03 --i � M i z. ,a [7 7 iZ m � � !c �a D =m MEMORANDUM TO: DENNIS TARANGO, ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: RONALD L. KRANZER, CITY ENGINEE 2, // SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FUND 225, 250 & 226 225 - GRAND AVENUE TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS (AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY The agreement provides for various improvements along the Grand Avenue corridor which consist primarily of signal improvements. Attached is a Gnatt Chart indicating the projects and status. $1,200,000.00 250 - VARIOUS PROJECTS Kiowa Crest at Diamond Bar Boulevard $ 98,000.00 (Traffic Signal - Administered by L.A. County) Pathfinder Road Bridge Widening & Signals 992,000.00 (Administered by L.A. County) Sunset Crossing at Golden Springs Road 100,000.00 (Traffic Signal - Administered by Diamond Bar) Park Improvements 40,000.00 $1,230,000.00 226 - CHINO HILLS PARKWAY Provides for certain design and construction involvement by the City of Diamond Bar, per agreement, in the construction of Chino Hills Parkway, within the City Limits of Diamond Bar. $ 250,000.00 x Y O O O BUDGET REQUEST PARRS AND MAINTENANCE FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINE AT MAPLE HILL PARK In December, 1989, the Parks Commission received a petition signed by two (2) residents living adjacent to Maple Hill Park. The peti- tion requested that fencing be installed along Park boundaries, behind approximately six (6) homes. The residents complain of intrusion onto their property by Park users. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Install fencing along the Maple Hill Park boundary. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 10,000 for survey of Park property line, brush clearance of fence line and installation of chain link fencing. BUDGET REQUEST PARRS AND MAINTENANCE REPLACE WINDSCREENS ON TENNIS COURTS AT MAPLE HILL PARK The windscreens surrounding the tennis courts at Maple Hill Park are in a state of disrepair. The screens are brittle and torn, therefore do not fully serve their purpose. While being dysfunc- tional, they are also aesthetically unappealing. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Replace the windscreens. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 2,000 BUDGET REQUEST PARKS AND MAINTENANCE SHADE STRUCTURE AND PICNIC TABLE FOR PETERSON PARK One of the items removed from the Peterson Park construction con- tract was the picnic/shade structure. The park lacks any shaded areas due to the absence of any structures or mature trees. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Install a shade structure as originally designed at Peterson Park. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 12,000 o �' BUDGET REQUEST PARRS AND MAINTENANCE PLAY EQUIPMENT FOR CARLTON J. PETERSON PARK One of the items eliminated from the construction contract at the Carlton J. Peterson Park was the playground equipment in the Tot - Lot. The City has gone to considerable expense in building the Tot -Lot, and now it is little more than a large sandbox. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Purchase and have installed the state of the art equipment similar to the attached flyer. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 20,000.00 for equipment purchase and instal- lation. BUDGET REQUEST PARKS AND MAINTENANCE TIMERS ON BALLFIELD LIGHTS AT HERITAGE PARK The sports field lights at Heritage Park are turned on and off by a manual switch. On numerous occasions, the Parks Staff has found the lights on in the morning. Control of all the groups using the facility is difficult. It is estimated that the light cost eight dollars ($8.00) per hour to operate. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Install an automatic timer on the lighting system. This will shut off the lights at a predesignated time. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 2,500.00 JAMES L. MARKMAN ANDREW V. ARCZYNSKI RALPH D. HANSON F. ELLIOT GOLOMAN JEFFREY KING D. CRAIG FOX MARTHA GEISLER PATTERSON WILLIAM P. CURLEY = MEMORANDUM TO: �zw -/ /�G,rir�rre�rv, J4�rrr�ijrr�ir�; /�plairrdrrry � �,U�rruvry Jdda0 Z�,or�ia/crr�iOw NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE P. O. BOX 1059 BREA, CALIFORNIA 92 622-10 59 (714) 990-0901 TELEPHONE (213) 691-3811 9113 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUITE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 May 24, 1990 TELEPHONE `(7141 990-2742 (7 14) 381-0218 Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager, City of Diamond Bar IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO: Brea FROM: D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney c� RE: Modification to Purchasing Ordinance - Preference to Businesses Located Within City Pursuant to the Council's recent direction, enclosed herewith please find an ordinance modifying the City's Purchasing Ordinance so as to provide a preference, in competitive bid situations, to local businesses. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. DCF:lj1 Encl. L\1011\MRVANORT\DB 4.3 ORDINANCE NO. 20A (1989) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 20 (1989) PERTAINING TO COMPETITIVE BIDS FROM RESIDENT BUSINESSES. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 20 (1989), as heretofore adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Section 23. Award of Formal Bids. Except as otherwise provided herein, formal bid contracts shall be awarded by the City Council to the lowest responsible bidder. The determination of "lowest responsible bidder" shall be at the discretion of the City Council pursuant to findings and recommendations presented by the purchasing agent at the time and award of contract. "Section 24. Tie Formal Bids. Subject to the provisions of Section 24.A hereinafter, if two or more formal bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not.permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the City Council may in its discretion accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by and after negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the bid opening or award of contract. "Section 24A. Preference to Businesses Located in the City. In determining the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing materials, equipment or supplies pursuant to a notice inviting bids, the City Manager shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder maintaining a place of business within the City limits if such bid is not more than one percent (1%) in excess of the bid filed by the lowest responsible bidder who does not maintain a place of business within the City limits. If the award is based upon the one percent (1%) preference, the contract shall specify that the same was entered into with a bidder maintaining a place of business within the corporate limits of the City of Diamond Bar. 1 This Section shall not be applicable unless payment is to be made solely from funds and revenues of the City of Diamond Bar." Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted in three (3) public places as required by Resolution No. 89-6. 1990. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of Mayor I, LINDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: N\1011\ORD\DB 4.3 2 Linda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar AGENDA NO. )3 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 30, 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney At the City Council meeting of May 15, 1990, there was limited discussion with respect to the possibility of implementing a moratorium regarding signs, pending final review and approval of the City's Sign Ordinance which is presently under consideration by Planning staff and the Planning Commission. In order for the staff to prepare an appropriate Urgency Ordinance implement- ing such a moratorium, it is requested that the City Council discuss the scope of such an Ordinance in order that the same may be brought back at the earliest available opportunity. As the Council is aware, the City's Ordinances presently require that any freestanding sign proposed to be con- structed in excess of six feet in height requires a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the question which requires resolution is whether Council desires to require a Conditional Use Permit for signs of a shorter height, desires to expand the Conditional Use Permit requirements for wall mounted signs or wishes to simply restrict all signing approvals pending finalization of a new Sign Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Council provide input to the staff in order that an appropriate Ordinance may be framed for Council consideration at the June 19, 1990 meeting. AVA/lb FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: D BY: (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) Robert L. Van Nort City Manager ---------------------- -------------------- Andrew V. Arczynski Linda Magnuson City Attorney Sr. Accountant J?1y of LOS 4N' *per _ �li �.'�1 `♦ ,- K r C'4LIFpRN��' THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Director April 27, 1990 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 Mr. Robert Van Nort City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21660 East Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Mr. Van Nort: ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE. PD— 6 810.11 ANNUAL AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES WITH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Enclosed are an original and three copies of each of the Agreements for Examination of Tract Maps and Parcel Maps, Industrial Waste, and for the maintenance of Traffic Signal and Highway Safety Lighting. We currently provide these services for your City under a one-year Agreement which terminates on June 30, 1990. We propose to continue providing these services for one-year periods with automatic renewals. If you concur with these Agreements, please present them to your duly authorized officials for approval. Upon approval by your City, please return the original and two copies to the Department of Public Works for further processing. Your expeditious review, approval and return for Board of Supervisors' action in early June would be appreciated. Please contact Mr. Lynn Nicholson at (818) 458-3917 if you have any questions regarding these Agreements. very truly yours, T'_ A. TIDE NSON �I t HAJR W. STONE De u y Director SI:jm/NORT Enc. cc: Supervisor Pete Schabarum AQDuBi vn CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 30 1990 MEETING DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: City Manager ,l(_ C FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney SUBJECT: Annual Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Pursuant to Council direction, staff has discussed the Council's request to amend the agreements in question to provide a reciprocal termination pro- vision in favor of the City. Those discussions included Mr. Lynn Nicholson of County staff as well as representatives from the County Counsel's Office. It is the County's position that the agreements, at this time, cannot be amended. The County Counsel indicates that approximately 87 cities in the County utilize the County's services and the contracts have been "standard- ized." Accordingly, it is the present policy of the Board of Supervisors not to negotiate individualized contracts for the type of services in question. County Counsel did note, however, that they would be receptive to discus- sions, on a coordinated basis (through the Contract Cities Association), of issues pertaining to the termination provision. As a practical matter, the City is under no obligation to actually utilize the services of the County under the agreements. Accordingly, if the Council were to determine that it desires to utilize the services of City staff or independent contractors with respect to the services offered by the County, the City would be free to do so without incurring expenses under the County contracts. Such an arrangement would, in effect, be a de facto termination of the agreements. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the agreements as drafted and cause the same to be executed as required. AVA/lb FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Requested $ Budgeted Amount $ In Account Number: Deficit: $ Revenue Source: (Narrative continued on next page if necessary) REV WED BY• Robert L. Van Nort Andrew V. Arczynski City Manager City Attorney -------------------- Linda Magnuson Sr. Accountant JAMES L, MARKMAN ANDREW V. ARCZYNSKI RALPH D. HANSON F. ELLIOT GOLDMAN JEFFREY KING D. CRAIG FOX MARTHA GEISLER PATTERSON WILLIAM P. CURLEY 111 e ��'(AA//'7t,�172-/X/12 i c>,�S�,�j��I"✓D�'.G'. L�pGGI//(!/q/7�l ff' U.4�(2�r�.Q/Y(/' Jro%bL ZJ,orfeo�atLmv NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE P.O. BOX 1059 BREA, CALIFORNIA 92622-1059 TELEPHONE (714) 990-0901 (2 13) 691-3811 9113 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUITE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 May 24, 1990 TELEPHONE t x(714) 980-2742 (714) 381-0218 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO: Brea MEMORANDUM TO: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager, City of Diamond Bar FROM: D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney RE: Modification to Purchasing Ordinance - Preference to Businesses Located Within City Pursuant to the Council's recent direction, enclosed herewith please find an ordinance modifying the City's Purchasing Ordinance so as to provide a preference, in competitive bid situations, to local businesses. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. DCF: lj1 Encl. L\1011\MRVANORT\DB 4.3 ORDINANCE NO. 20A (1989) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 20 (1989) PERTAINING TO COMPETITIVE BIDS FROM RESIDENT BUSINESSES. The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 20 (1989), as heretofore adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Section 23. Award of Formal Bids. Except as otherwise provided herein, formal bid contracts shall be awarded by the City Council to the lowest responsible bidder. The determination of "lowest responsible bidder" shall be at the discretion of the City Council pursuant to findings and recommendations presented by the purchasing agent at the time and award of contract. "Section 24. Tie Formal Bids. Subject to the provisions of Section 24.A hereinafter, if two or more formal bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the City Council may in its discretion accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by and after negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the bid opening or award of contract. "Section 24A. Preference to Businesses Located in the City. In determining the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing materials, equipment or supplies pursuant to a notice inviting bids, the City Manager shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder maintaining a place of business within the City limits if such bid is not more than one percent (1%) in excess of the bid filed by the lowest responsible bidder who does not maintain a place of business within the City limits. If the award is based upon the one percent (1%) preference, the contract shall specify that the same was entered into with a bidder maintaining a place of business within the corporate limits of the City of Diamond Bar. 1 This Section shall not be applicable unless payment is to be made solely from funds and revenues of the City of Diamond Bar." Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted in three (3) public places as required by Resolution No. 89-6. 1990. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , Mayor I, LINDA BURGESS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: N\1011\ORD\DB 4.3 2 Linda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar ,JAMES L. MARKMAN ANDREW V. ARCZYN5K1 RALPH D. HANSON F, f LOOT GOLDMAN JEFFREY KING D. CRAIG FOX MARTHA GEISLER PATTERSON WILLIAM P. CJRLEY III MEMORANDUM TO: 6? r _frrci� 1;���a:n :&.r/a'�i zci jY'1.1h[. C(��[Z•)7JGi2�Zr-, cIG�YI)1 rY)Y:, June 5, 1990 NLIM5ER ONE CIVIC CENTER CI`CLE P.O. BOX 1053 eREA, CALI FOR N IA 9,822 •1059 (714j 890-06101 TELLPHtlNE (213) 601-3811 9113 1`001HILL B0L'LEVARD SUITE 2DO :iAr�Crl6 CvC".MQNGA. CALIFORNIA, 91730 1714; e8O-2742 TELEPHONE (7i4)3$1 -021b IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO: Brea Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager, City of Diamond Bar FROM: Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney AAZ- RE: Purchasing Requirements - Use of Recycled Paper by Vendors. I am in receipt of the documentation forwarded by your secretary, this date, regarding the above -referenced matter. As we have briefly discussed, I have some Concerns with a 'flat out" requirement that all City vendors utilize recycled materials, recycled paper and/or provide all documents with "front to back" copying. As a practical matter, it may be that many vendors are unable to provide recycled materials in the normal course of business. By way of example, if the City were to request that all proposals with respect to consulting work be provided on recycled paper, certain qualified consultants simply may not submit proposals because they do not have recycled paper, at hand. It is difficult, at best, to know specifically whether or not that would create an issue thereby disqualifying certain potential vendors and consultants. The City Council, has of course, directed that Staff utilize recycled paper and other materials, where possible. Stated otherwise, when the City is in need of additional paper supplies the purchasing will be pursuant to the normal purchasing ordinance, but specify that the paper, required shall be recycled paper. With respect to "front to back copying", it would appear that a requirement in the bid specs and or request for proposals would simply indicate that all documents submitted in response thereto would have to be printed "back to front." With respect to the bidding process and request for proposals, it should be noted that section 31 of the purchasing Ordinance does provide that the City Council shall prescribe by resolution various procedures, rules and regulations governing the solicitation selection and award of proposals or bids for personal services, professional services or consulting services. The inclusion in such a procedural resolution of a requirement that request for proposals, bids and the like be presented with "front to back" copying and on recycled paper could obviously be included. Additionally, should it be the City Council's direction, we could obviously work with the engineering staff to include similar language in the City's public works contract documents. As you know, when those documents are produced by staff, they are almost always produced "front to back". The only exception to that would be the specific bid document itself which normally is single sided copying in order to provide for ease of reference once the bids are received. With respect to the purchasing ordinance, itself, should it be the Council's desire, the following language could be inserted in the appropriate location: SNCTIQN KTX. Recycled materials/copying. The City of Diamond Bar encourages the use of recycled paper and materials in response to all bids for services and supplies to the City. Wherever possible, preference will be given to those vendors, suppliers and consultants providing supplies and services to the City who utilized recycled materials, including recycled paper products. In addition, documents submitted for City use shall be presented with "front to back" copying in order to minimize the amount of file space necessary for the maintenance of such documents as well as to reduce the amount of paper required in the provision of governmental services. C\1011\MRVN\DB 4.3 resolution various procedures, rules and regulations governing the solicitation selection and award of proposals or bids for personal services, professional services or consulting services. The inclusion in such a procedural resolution of a requirement that request for proposals, bids and the like be presented with tPfront to back" copying and on recycled paper could obviously be included. Additionally, should it be the City Council's direction, we could obviously work with the engineering staff to include similar language in the City's public works contract documents. As you know, when those documents are produced by staff, they are almost always produced "front to back". The only exception to that would be the specific bid document itself which normally is single sided copying in order to provide for ease of reference once the bids are received. With respect to the purchasing ordinance, itself, should it be the Council's desire, the following language could be inserted in the appropriate location: SECTION AX. Recycled materials/copying. The City of Diamond Bar encourages the use of recycled paper and materials in response to all bids for services and supplies to the City. wherever possible, preference will be given to those vendors, suppliers and consultants providing supplies and services to the City who utilized recycled materials, including recycled paper products. In addition, documents submitted for City use shall be presented with "front to back" copying in order to minimize the amount of file space necessary for the maintenance of such documents as well as to reduce the amount of paper required in the provision of governmental services. C\1011\NRVN\D$ 4.3