HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/11/1989Councilman John Forbing
Councilman Gary G. Miller Next Resolution No. 59
Councilman Gary H. Werner Next Ordinance No.19
Mayor Pro Tem Paul V. Horcher
Mayor Phyllis E. Papen
THANK YOU FOR NOT SMOKING, DRINKING OR EATING
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF
THE DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL
July 11, 1989 -- 6:00 P.M. -•- W.V.U.S.D. BOARD ROOM
MARGIN NOTES
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
APPEARANCES PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATIONS:
1. The National Association of Town Watch, Inc.
would like all homeowners to turn their lights
on Tuesday, August 8, 1989, from the hours of
8:00 to 10:00 P.M. in support of Neighborhood
Watch groups.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD:
1
Citizen participation is invited at all
Council meetings. To insure that all Diamond
Bar residents have a fair opportunity to
appear before the City Council, a Public
Comment period is included on each regular
City Council Agenda. Council policy is that
individual presentations not exceed five
minutes. The Council will hear public
comments regarding regular agenda items at
the time the particular matter is presented
for Council consideration. The Council will
make no decisions or take any action on those
matters presented during the Public Comment
period.
Councilman John Forbing Next Resolution No. 59
Councilman Gary G. Miller Next Ordinance No. 19
Councilman Gary H. Werner
Mayor Pro Tem Paul V. Horcher
Mayor Phyllis E. Papen
CITY COUNCIL COMMENT PERIOD:
STAFF REPORTS:
2. Report from Chris Adams, Walnut Valley
Recreation Department
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approve the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 20,
1989 as submitted.
4. WARRANT REGISTER - Approve the warrant
register dated July 11, 1989 in the total
amount of $28,871.01.
5. MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS -It is
recommended that the City Council approve
the Agreement for Maintenance of State
Highways, between the City of Diamond Bar and
the State of California.
6. ANNEXATION TO COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT 10006 - It is recommended that
the City Council adopt a Resolution granting
consent and jurisdiction to the County of
Los Angeles in the matter of County Lighting
Maintenance District 10006 and County
Lighting District LLA -1 City of Diamond Bar
Zone Project 135-59.
7. CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION FOR GENERAL AND
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY/SELF INSURANCE PROGRAM
It is recommended that the City Council
retain the services of Colen and Lee, a
Diamond Bar -based insurance claims company
on an hourly basis. It is also recommended
that at such time as the City's claims
adjusting services exceed $500, the City
retain Colen and Lee on a $500 per month
service contract.
8. ESTABLISHMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR - It is recommended that the City Council
adopt Resolution No. 89 - establishing the
appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 1989-90.
2
Councilman John Forbing Next Resolution No. 59
Councilman Gary A. Miller Next Ordinance No. 19
Councilman Gary H. Werner
Mayor Pro Tem Paul V. Horcher
Mayor Phyllis E. Papen
9. MILAGE REIMBURSEMENT - Establishment of
milage reimbursement and recommended
adoption Resolution No. 89 -
establishing the IRS rate of $.24/mile
for reimbursement of private vehicle on
City business.
10. BOND COUNSEL - It is recommended that the
City Council approve the appointment of
the Law firm of HAWKINS, DELLAFIELD AND WOOD
as Bond Counsel
11. C.A.S. SOFTWARE - It is recommended that the
City Council authorize the purchase of C.A.S.
Software for development and preparation for
the City's financial records.
12. PARK FEES - It is recommended that the City
Council approve the reservation fees for
park facilities.
13. AMERICAN FLAG - It is recommended that the
City Council adopt Resolution No. 89 -
urging the Congress of the United States
to adopt a Constitutional Amendment
prohibiting the desecration of the American
flag.
NEW BUSINESS
14. APPOINTMENT OF CITY CLERK - It is recommended
that the City Council approve the appointment
of Linda Burgess as City Clerk and adopt
Resolution No. 89 - effective July 17,
1989.
WALNUT E.I.R. - Report by John Gutwein
regarding Notice of Intent to Draft
Environmental Impact Report by Walnut.
Councilman John Forbing
Councilman Gary G. Miller
Councilman Gary H. Werner
Mayor Pro Tem Paul V. Horcher
Mayor Phyllis E. Papen
OLD BUSINESS:
Next Resolution No. 59
Next Ordinance No. 19
16. ANIMAL CONTROL FEES - It is recommended that
the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 16-
(1989) pertaining to Animal Control fees.
2nd reading by title only.
17. FIREWORKS - An Ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar prohibiting the
sale, use or discharge of any fireworks
within the City of Diamond Bar. 2nd
reading by title only:
18. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - Carlton J.
Peterson Park. Approve contract with Kranzer
and Associates for construction management
or take action as necessary.
19. COUNCIL RETREAT - Oral presentation on
Council Retreat July 9 and 10, 1989.
20. STAFF REPORTS - Regarding actions taken
following adoption of Ordinance 11-(89) and
Ordinance 15-(89)
PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 F.M. or as soon thereafter
21. The Koll Company wishes to create seven (7)
commercial lots on 5.1 acres located at
west side of Gateway Center Drive, between
Valley Vista Drive and Bridge Gate Drive in
Diamond Bar.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
This is the time set aside for any City
Councilmember to direct staff regarding
any matters to be discussed at the next
regular meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
22. Grand Avenue Litigation - Section 54956.9
23. Personnel - Section 54957.6
4
ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned to July 18, 1989 6:00 P.M.
at Walnut Valley Unified School District
Board Room.
5
SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF
June 21, 1989
Offirr of thr �I riff
1r 1 of DI U,- irr
3[11r lt�rlr„, Cralifarttia n111112
Mayor Phyllis Papcn
City of Diamond Bar
21660 Copley Drive, #330
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Dear M y`dfi ..A, �
On Tuesday, August 8, 1989 the National Association of Town Watch, Incorporated, headquartered
in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, will be sponsoring the Sixth Annual National Night Out Project.
This project is intended to highlight Neighborhood Watch programs and citizen involvement
activities throughout the country. Previous activities included parades, candlelight walks,
cookouts, and block parties.
Participation in this nationwide event is intended to demonstrate the value and effectiveness of law
enforcement and community members working together in a partnership against crime.
y of nationwide partn tii-c�10:00p-
_and
oss the country turning on of outside
fight etween the hours m. is will be a symbolic message that
eighborhood Watch groups are in p ace will not be tolerated.
In support of this project and its concept of community involvement, I am urging all
Neighborhood Watch groups and concerned citizens in Los Angeles County to participate in the
National Night Out Projeet.
I would welcomeyou-r-G i -y' lvement and support of this year's project and encourage your
designation August 8, las "N 'ghborhood Watch Day” within your community.
If you should desire additional information regarding this project, please contact Captain Vetter at
Walnut Station.
Sincerely, }
SHERMAN BLOCK
SHERIFF
RECEIVE -0 3 0 ►3819
STATPOF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
TDD (213) 620.3550"
/
(213) 620-3818r
Ij
t
June 27, 1989 File: 510
Mr. Robert Van North
City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Dr., Suite 330
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Dear Mr. Van North:
Attached for your approval are two copies of the Agreement for
Maintenance of State Highways, between the City of Diamond Bar and
State of California, Department of Transportation.
Please have the City officials execute their portion of this
Agreement and attach an adopted resolution approving the
Agreement. Please return both copies to State of California,
Department of Transportation, 120 So. Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, Attention: Mr, Jim Ishiki, Room 136.
We will then formally execute this Agreement with the District
Director of Transportation's signature. Upon formal execution we
will return a copy of the fully executed agreement to the City of
Diamond Bar.
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions
regarding the agreement, please contact Mr. Ishiki at (213)
620-3818.
Sincerely,
,S'eni7Or Maintenance 7ngineer
Attach.
J04 2 9 0001
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY
THIS AGREFYENT, made and executed in duplicate this
day of ,19 , by and between the State of California,
acting by and through the Department of Transportaton, hereinafter referred to
as "the STATE" and the CITY of DIAMCND BAR hereinafter referred to
as "CITY".
WITNESSETH:
A. RECITALS:
The Parties desire to provide for the CITY to perform particular
maintenance functions on the State highway within the CITY as provided in
Section 130 of the Streets and Highways Code.
This Agreement shall supersede any previous AGREEMENT FCR MAINTENENCE OF
STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR and/or AMENDMENTS thereto
with the CITY.
-1-
JI/M
In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained,
it is agreed:
The CITY will perform such maintenance work as is specifically delegated
to it, on the State highway routes or porticos hereof all as hereinafter
described under Section H hereof or as said section may be subsequently
modified with the consent of the parties hereto acting by and through their
authorized representative.
C. MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code as
follows:
Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping of rights of way, and each type
of roadway, structure, safety convenience or device, planting,
illumination equipment and other facility, in the safe and
usable condition to which it has been improved or constructed,
but does not include reconstruction, or other improvement.
"(b) Operation of special safety conveniences and devices, and
illtuninating equipment.
-2-
"(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair necessitated by
accidents or by storms or other weather conditions, slides,
settlements or other unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway
structure or facility."
D. DEGREE OF MAINTENANCE:
The degree or extent of maintenance work to be performed and the
standards therefore shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 27
of the Streets and Highways Code, as set forth in the current edition of the
State Maintenance Manual (a copy of which has been provided to the CITY), or
as may be prescribed from time to time by the District Director. "District
Director" as used herein, means the District Director of the Department of
Transportation assigned to the territory in which the CITY is located, or
his authorized representative.
The STATE reserves the option to check at random all areas of STATE
HIGHWAYS maintained by the CITY to assure conformance to maintenance levels.
Failure of the CITY to canply with the maintenance levels would be reason to
terminate this agreement as specified under Section J "Term of Agreement."
However, this random check does not preempt the CITIES maintenance
responsibilities as spelled out in the Agreement.
-3-
An encroachment permit will be required for third parties when
maintenance work is redelegated. Such redelegated work shall be performed to
the same levels of service as spelled out herein and will be subject to the
same random checks as provided for work performed directly by CITY forces.
The level of service of maintenance in each of the programs delegated
to the CITY has been considered in setting authorized total and route dollar
amounts. The CITY may perform additional work if desired but the STATE will
not reimburse the CITY for any work in excess of authorized dollars. The
District Director may authorize adjustments needed because of inflation or
changes in program emphasis.
E. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
Nothing in the provisions of the Agreement is intended to create duties
or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this contract or
affect the legal liability of either party to the contract by imposing any
standard of care respecting the maintenance of State highways different from
the standard of care imposed by law.
It is understood and agreed that neither STATE, nor any officer or
employee is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of
anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
Agreement.
-4-
It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4 CITY shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State
of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or
actions of every name, kind and description brought for or in account of
injuries to or death of any person or damage to property resulting from
anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under
this Agreement.
The CITY waives any and all rights to any type of express and implied
indemnity against the STATE, its officers and employees arising from any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this Agreement.
F. MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS:
The CITY shall perform only those maintenance functions delegated, as
identified, in Section H (DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE) of this Agreement.
A brief description of those maintenance functions delegated to the CITY
are as shown on Attachment 1. The functions are identified by the Caltrans
HM Program Codes.
Locations of the signals and light facilities to be maintained by the
CITY are shown on Exhibit B. -5-
G. EXPENDITURE AUTHORIZATION:
The STATE will reimburse the CITY for actual cost of all routine
maintenance work performed by CITY as delegated under Section H of this
Agreement, but it is agreed that during any fiscal year, the maximum
expenditure on any route shall not exceed the amount as shown on Section H of
this Agreement, unless such expenditure is revised by an amended Agreement or
otherwise adjusted or modified as hereinafter provided for.
A new "DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE" sheet (Section H) will be provided
annually by the STATE for the ensuing fiscal year, if necessary to ensure
equitable annual cost.
The expenditure per route for routine maintenance work as referred to
above may be increased or decreased, redistributed between routes, or
additional expenditures for specific projects costing $5,000 or less may be
made when such adjustment of expenditures for routine maintenance or such
specific work is authorized in writing by the District Director or his
authorized representative. Expenditures for specific projects costing in
excess of the above amount may be made when such specific work is authorized
in writing by the District Director with prior approval from the Chief,
Division of Maintenance at Headquarters.
Additional expenditures or adjustment of expenditures thus authorized shall
apply during the fiscal year designated therein and shall not be deanec3 to
permanently modify or change the basic maximum expenditure per route as
hereinafter specified. An adjustment of the said maximum expenditure, either
increase or decrease, shall not affect other terms of the Agreement.
H. DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE
The specific maintenance functions indicated below are hereby delegated to
the CITY. This delegation of maintenance function set forth herein does not
include areas and functions of which the control and maintenance rest with the
local authority under the terms of Freeway Agreements, Freeway Maintenance Agreements,
and/or Encroachment Permits.
ROUTE LENGTH PROGRAM
NO. MILES DESCRIP'T'ION OF ROUTING DELEGRTED
60 5.88 Pomona Fwy. from the west HM4K
city limit (PM R21.70) east
of Fairway Dr. to the east
city limit (R27.58) east
of Golden Springs Dr., a
length of 5.88 miles.
Total length of 5.88 miles
-7-
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
AUI'HORI ZED
T7VD114nmrmrmV
$9,000
$ 9,000
I. SUBMISSION OF BILLS:
The CITY shall submit bills in a consistent periodic sequence (monthly,
quarterly, semiannually or annually). Bills for less than $500 shall not be
submitted more than once each quarter. Bills iTust be submitted promptly
following close of correspa-iding billing period and should be coded according
to the Caltrans flM Program Code as outlined in this Agreement. Bills
submitted for periods prior to the last fiscal year will be deemed waived and
not be honored.
Equipment shall be charged at mutually acceptable rental rates and labor
and material at actual cost. The CITY will be allowed to recover overhead
and administrative costs only to the extent that such charges include
applicable expenses incurred by the CITY in the execution of the work. Said
factors and method shall be subject to approval by the STATE.
Maintenance services provided by contract or on a unit -rate basis with
overhead costs included shall not have these abovementioned charges added
again. An actual handling charge for processing this type of bill will be
allowed to the City.
-8-
Emergency and storm repairs performed by the CITY will be paid for only
with prior approval of the STATE'S Highway Superintendent of that specific
area. In addition, the CITY should imnediatel.y notify the S'TATE'S Area
Superintendent for the area of any storm damage or other emergency condition
affecting the STATE highway. The CITY shall maintain, on a generally accepted
accounting basis complete and accurate records that support all billings.
These records shall be made available to STATE: representatives for review
during normal business hours for a period of three (3) years after payment of
said billings.
J. TERM OF AGRER4ENT:
This Agreement shall become effective
and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated.
This Agreement may be anended or terminated at any time upon mutual
consent of the parties thereto. This Agreement may also be terminated by
either party upon thirty (30) days notice to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals
the day and year first abc ve written.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
By_
Mayor
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DERARTiv,EN7.' OF TRANSPORTATION
R013ERT K. BEST
Director of Transportation
By
City Attorney Senior Maintenance Engineer
By
-10-
Attachment I
HM4K ELECTRICAL
This includes maintenance work performed on highway electrical
facilities including flashing beacons, traffic signals,
traffic -signal systems, safety lighting and sign lighting. It
also includes the electrical energy for these items.
Timing sequence of traffic signals shall be determined after
consultation with the CITY; however, the decision of the District
Director of Transportation shall be final. Maintenance of the
"designed" timing is the responsibility of the
CITY. Timing records shall be kept in both CITY Maintenance and
Traffic Branches.
EEM2ERGENCY OPERATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAIS
Flashing operation shall be considered as the "primary emergency
mode of operation at all intersections". Red/Yellow or all red
may be used, as determined by State Traffic Engineering.
Every effort shall be made to restore the intersection to normal
operation as soon as possible.
-11-
EXHIBIT "B"
(QTY)
PARTICIPATION SCHEDULE FCR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHT FACILITIES
% COST DISTRIBUTION
RTE LOCATION CITY STATE
60 (EB) Colima Rd -Pomona F`,ay. 50 50
R22.95
60 (WB) Old Brea Cyn -Pomona Fwy. 50 50
R22.97
60 (EB) Grand Ave -Pomona Fwy. 50 50
R24.45
-12-
i r
` RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Diamond Bar APPROVING
AGREEMMT FOR MAINTENANCE
OF
STATE HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF Diammd Bar
WHEREAS, the State of California, through its Department of
Transportation has presented the Agreement for Maintenance of State highway in
the CITY OF Diamond Bar , dated
WHEREAS, the City Council has heard read said Amendment for Maintenance
of State highways in full and is familiar with the contents thereof:
THEREFORE, be it resolved by City Council of the CITY of Diamcnd Bar
that said Agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor and the CITY Clerk are
directed to sign the same on behalf of said CITY.
ADOPTED thi s
Attest:
City Clerk
day of , 19
Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and
regularly passed by the City Council of the CITY of Diamond Bar at a
regular meeting thereof held '19--.
City Clerk
-13-
5�^
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT AND JURISDICTION
TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
IN THE MATTER OF
COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006
AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ZONE
PROJECT 135-59
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is about
to commence proceedings under Divisions 7 and 15 of the Streets and Highways
Code for the annexation of territory to County Lighting Maintenance
District 10006 and County Lighting District LLA -1; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation will have street lights installed in
the City of Diamond Bar; and
WHEREAS, all of the land included in the proposed annexation lies within
the boundary of the City of Diamond Bar,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
as follows:
SECTION I
That the public interest, convenience and necessity require the maintenance
of a street lighting system located within said territory as shown on the maps
of the annexation to the County Lighting Maintenance District 10006 and County
Lighting District LLA -1 on file in the office of the Director of Public Works.
I
SECTION II
That this City Council hereby consents to the annexation of said territory,
as shown on the attached map and/or described in the attached legal description,
included within the boundaries of said annexation, and lying within the boundary
of the City of Diamond Bar.
SECTION III
That this City Council hereby finds and determines that the land included
within the boundary of the proposed annexation lying within the boundary of
the City of Diamond Bar, will be benefited by the said proposed annexa-
tions, and hereby consents to the inclusion of said lands within the proposed
annexation and to the assessment thereof.
SECTION IV
That the consent of this City is hereby given to the commencement of the
proceedings for said annexation to the County Lighting Maintenance District 10006
and County Lighting District LLA -1 by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Los Angeles, and to the exercise of exclusive jurisdiction of said Board
of Supervisors over all proceedings necessary thereto for the purpose of
consummating the same, all in accordance with the provisions of Divisions 7
and 15 of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION V
That the Clerk of the City Council is hereby directed to certify and
deliver two copies of this resolution to the Director of Public Works of the
County of Los Angeles.
\ O
O
ell
O �
p PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
d LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
10006 AND COUNTY .LIGHTING
A ! _ ISTR LLA -1 _
Q -0
F=DM ND_ 8AR ZONE
v O p-RU.1__ 1315-15-11�
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF pUSLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC AND 118NTIN8 DIVISION
rain by �ScaNr �Iw
8�
ttowwand.d R
`• S'-31-84
iprovad
TG 017--D5
CCrTTnk1 VT
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this resolution by the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, and shall cause the same to be posted
in three (3) conspicuous places in the City of Dimaond Bar, and it shall
thereupon take effect.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar at its meeting held ,
19 , by the following vote:
By
City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing
document is a full, true and correct
copy of Resolution No.
on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Diamod Bar, California
City Clerk
By
Deputy
F .LOS
R I
• C'4UFORN�D
THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director
CECIL E. BUGH, Chief Deputy Director
MAS NAGAMI, Assistant Director
June 22, 1989
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE"
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331
Telephone: (818) 458-5100
Mr. Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
21660 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Dear Mr. Van Nort:
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
P.O. BOX 1460
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460
IN REPLY PLEASE T-3
REFER TO FILE: 81 O. 25 . /6
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY LIGHTING '
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006
AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1
d
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ZONE
PROJECT 135-59
The area shown on the enclosed map is being processed for annexation to
the subject lighting district in order to provide funds for the operation
and maintenance of street lights to be installed by the developer. Since
this area is within the boundaries of the City of Diamond Bar, we will need
permission from the City Council before the annexation procedures may be
consummated.
Enclosed are three copies of a Re,s.ol..ut.ion Grant"ng,,Consent and Jurisdiction
to the County of Los Angeles in the matter of annexing the area within the
City to the subject lighting district.
Please present this Resolution to the Council at its meeting. If the Council
adopts the Resolution, please have two copies executed and returned to
this Department.
Very truly yours,
T. A�.TIDEWMANS 'ON
Director of Public Works
VRS:lmj/3aLDP
Enc.
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
JULY 11., 1989 CONSENT C
Meeting Date Agenda P1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Van Nort, City Manager
SUBJECT: Claims Administration for General and
Automobile Liability/Self-Insurance Program
The City of Diamond Bar is currently using the services of Don Des Combes
of the Averback Company to provide brokerage services. The Averback
Company has secured coverage with Planet Insurance. It is necessary for
the City, in addition to the obtained insurance, to secure claims
administration services. This is a standard requirement contained within
all municipal policies. There are two options for the City:
o To employ a Risk Managers or
o To retain'the services of a private consultant. 'd
RECOMMENDATION`S-�-
o Staff recommends that the City retain the services of Colen and Lee, a
Diamond Bar -based insurance claims company, on an hourly basis. Their
rates are contained on Page 2 of tete attached proposal.
o It is further recommended the- at such time as the City's claims
adjusting services exceed $500, the City retain Colen and Lee on a $500
pe month service contract.
Robert b Van Mork
C i ty Manager
RLY1,9'pds
4
1
i
Self -Insurance Management (714) 861-0816
1930 South Brea Canyon Road, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
COLENAND LEE
Proposal for Administration
of a
GENERAL & AUTO LIABILITY SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM
for the
City of Diamond Bar
Submitted
May 8, 1989
Self -Insurance Management 861-0816 COLEN AND LEE
1930 South Brea Canyon Road,,Suite 700, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
May 8, 1989
Don Des Combes
Insurance Broker
AVERBACK COMPANY
1890 North Garey Avenue
Pomona, California 91767
Re: Liability Claims Administration
for City of Diamond Bar
Dear Mr. Des Combes:
Thank you for inviting us to submit a proposal for administration of the
' City of Diamond Bar's liability self-insurance program. We would be hon-
ored to provide service to the City in connection with this program. The
following are highlights of our program:
' 1. Professional claims administration by a company
that has built a solid reputation for quality
' service since its founding in 1982.
2. Comprehensive, monthly Loss Experience Reports.
' 3. Highly qualified staff with 10 years average
claims experience.
'
4, Readily available staff.
5. Expertise in Municipality Programs.
'
6. Cost-effective use of independent, professional
investigators.
'
7. Flexibility in meeting clients needs.
SERVICE LOCATION
'
We are headquarterd in the City of Diamond Bar. All services would be
provided from our Diamond Bar office. As you know, many of our
employees, including both principals of the; firm, are residents of the
City.
SERVICE FEES
'
Normally, our clients pay us a flat service fee per month for the ser-
vices outlined in this proposal. If the C9'_ty of Diamond Bar preferred
'
this approach, our fee for the first year of service would be $500.00 per
month.
n
L
L
n
u
May 8, 1989
Liability Claims Administration
Page 2
You also requested a time and expense quotation. Our fees on this basis
would be:
Adjusting Services
Consulting Services
Data Processing Services
Mileage
Stenography
Photocopy
Loss Experience Reports
Photographs
Office & Administration
Other expenses
Minimum Monthly Fee
$35.00 per hour
50.00 per hour
50.00 per hour
.40 per mile
4.50 per page
.40 per page
3.00 per page
1.50 per photo
23% of services
at actual cost
none
' Of the two approaches, the flat service fee would probably be more cost
effective. With the exception of other expenses and allocated expenses
(see proposal), it includes all of the above charges. Although the City
' will probably have little claim activity, at least initially (since most
municipal services will be contracted out), there will probably be a need
for general, consultative services, which we include in our flat service
fee approach.
' For further information about our services, please refer to our proposal
and accompanying brochure. If, after reviewing this material, you have
' any questions, by all means feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
' G
fjw—
ryee
P
' GML/en
r
f]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction.......................................... 1
Transition............................................ 1
Conferences & Seminars ................................ 1
Claims Administration ................................. 2
Investigation ......................................... 3
Litigation Management ................................. 5
Cost Control .......................................... 5
Statistical Reports ................................... 6
Insurance............................................. 7
Allocated Expenses .................................... 7
Conclusion ............................................ 7
Appendix A - Client References ........................ 8
Appendix B - Sample Service Agreement ................. 12
Appendix C - Sample Statistical Reports ............... 21
1
INTRODUCTION
' Colen & Lee is a California corporation specializing in the
administration of claims for self-insured public entities. We have
1 been in business since 1982 and in that time have developed a
reputation for providing responsive, high quality service.
Furthermore, we have developed an expertise in public entity
' liability which few companies in our industry possess. If you
choose us to administer your liability program, we will put this
expertise to work for you while providing the services described on
' the following pages.
TRANSITION
1 To ensure the smooth transition of your program from your current
administrator to us, we would make all arrangements to transfer
' pending claim files and other records, incorporate both historical
and current claim data into our computer system, notify all
interested parties of the changeover, immediately review files and
' take appropriate action wherever necessary.
CONFERENCES & SEMINARS
tWe would meet with City staff periodically to discuss general proce-
dures and specific claims. Subject matter could include recent jury
verdicts, case law, changes in statutes and emerging trends in the
City's loss experience. This face-to-face contact would be a valu-
able tool in ensuring the smooth operation of the program.
' If the City desired, we could put on presentations concerning the
City's liability program to department heads and/or other City
staff. Such presentations could cover the subject matter described
' above. In addition, we could provide •basic orientation and training
with regard to what to do in the event of an accident, how to com-
plete accident reports, etc.
' h) Periodically review, at least every 90 days, all active cases
with an eye toward disposition and proper reserving.
' i) Determine fault.
j) Seek contribution or indemnity from responsible third parties.
' k) Evaluate damages and determine settlement value.
1) Provide narrative reports to the City when recommending rejec-
tion or settlement of a claim, or 'when there was an important
event, such as an approaching trial. These reports would be
clear and concise in style, complete and correct in content.
' m) Negotiate settlements.
n) Take releases and dismissals, filing the latter with the
appropriate court.
o) Initiate payment of settlements and expenses.
' p) Send denial letters to claimants or their attorneys when
CLAIMS
ADMINISTRATION
We
would take an active role in managing claims so that they were
handled properly, quickly and economically. To this end we would:
a)
Screen accident reports. If it appeared that a legitimate
claim was forthcoming, we would attempt to establish rapport
with the claimant before an attorney became involved. At the
'
same time, we would be careful not to solicit claims. If a
claim were unlikely, we would take no action.
'
b)
Establish files and set reserves on new cases.
c)
Tender claims to third parties when the City is named as an
'additional
insured on their insurance coverage.
d)
Promptly contact claimants or their attorneys and stay in touch
with them throughout the life of the case.
'
e)
Decide upon and initiate a course of investigation.
proper
'
f)
Report bodily injury cases to the Index Bureau (membership
required - ask for details).
g)
Report suspected fraud cases to the Insurance Crime Prevention
'
Institute and the California Department of Insurance Bureau of
Fraudulent Claims.
' h) Periodically review, at least every 90 days, all active cases
with an eye toward disposition and proper reserving.
' i) Determine fault.
j) Seek contribution or indemnity from responsible third parties.
' k) Evaluate damages and determine settlement value.
1) Provide narrative reports to the City when recommending rejec-
tion or settlement of a claim, or 'when there was an important
event, such as an approaching trial. These reports would be
clear and concise in style, complete and correct in content.
' m) Negotiate settlements.
n) Take releases and dismissals, filing the latter with the
appropriate court.
o) Initiate payment of settlements and expenses.
' p) Send denial letters to claimants or their attorneys when
t
appropriate.
q) Report severe injury cases to the City's excess liability insur-
ers and arrange for reimbursement to the City for losses in
'excess of the City's self-insurance retention.
r) Close files when appropriate to do so.
' With regard to settlement authority, we would follow the following
procedures:
' $1,000 and below our authority
From $1,000 to $5,000 by telephone
' Above $5,000 in writing
' Careful record keeping, documenting all aspects of any settlement
or other claim activity, would ensure strict accountability. Claim
files, logs, transaction documents and all other records associated
' with the program would be established and maintained in our office
for a period of not less than five (5) years in accordance with
State law. These records would be the property of the City and
would be available for review or transfer to another custodian at
' any time.
'
INVESTIGATION
Good, prompt investigation is important. With the information
'
developed through proper investigation, reserves are set more
accurately, legal expenses are reduced (less discovery is needed),
decisions about claim disposition are better and sources of
contribution and indemnity are identified.
tBut
as with anything, it should be used judiciously or else it can
become very expensive. We have found that much investigation can
'
be done quite effectively, and at lower cost, from the office,
using the mail and the telephone. Smaller or non -disputed cases
can be handled entirely in this manner. Many tasks on larger, more
complicated cases can also be handled this way. In such cases we
'
would:
a) Send questionnaires to claimants and witnesses.
'
b) Obtain recorded statements over the telephone from claimants
and witnesses.
c) Obtain photographs and documents from your personnel when these
11
items were available.
d) Obtain documentation of damages from claimants or their
attorneys.
e) Verify damages with claimant's doctors and employers.
If) Send written inquiries to other parties reporting claimants to
the Index Bureau.
There will be times when field investigation is required. For
instance, we would use field investigators when:
'
a)
Severe injuries were involved.
f)
b)
Personal contact was necessary to maintain rapport with
Perform investigative best done in field.
claimants on adverse liability cases.
g)
any other tasks the
To
help us evaluate cases or prepare them for trial, we would
c)
Trial preparation was necessary.
a
roster of highly professional specialists in various fields,
d)
Fraud was involved.
1
In
such cases, we would assign independent,
professional
'
investigators to:
b)
Professional photographers or map makers.
a)
Locate hard -to -find witnesses.
Remote photocopy services.
1
b)
Conduct activity or court index checks
on claimants.
c)
Obtain written, signed statements from
claimants and witnesses.
d)
Check out alleged doctors or employers
when we suspect they do
not exist.
'
e)
Conduct assets checks on co-defendants.
f)
Photograph accident scenes or vehicles.
Perform investigative best done in field.
g)
any other tasks the
To
help us evaluate cases or prepare them for trial, we would
sometimes require the assistance of specialists. We would maintain
a
roster of highly professional specialists in various fields,
including:
1
a)
Property damage appraisers.
b)
Professional photographers or map makers.
c)
Remote photocopy services.
d) Medical, engineering or accident reconstruction experts.
e) Economists, rehabilitation or structured settlement
specialists.
f) Translators.
LITIGATION MANAGEMENT
'
Litigation often represents a substantial part of a program's cost.
We would work closely with the City and its defense attorneys to
find ways to minimize this cost.
'
The best form of litigation management is avoidance. This may mean
promptly settling cases that should be settled. Or it may mean
persuading a claimant or attorney not to pursue a case. However,
it is not always possible to avoid litigation, so when it happens,
we would:
a) Appoint a qualified defense attorney from a list of firms
'
approved by the City.
b) Provide the defense attorney with our complete file, including
aWe
all investigation.
regard to investigations, assignments would be limited to specific
'
c) Continue the claims administration functions previously
described.
d) Continue the investigation functions previously described.
'
e) Audit and approve all expenses.
f) Initiate payment of approved expenses.
g) Attend Settlement Conferences on behalf of the City.
We would rely on defense attorneys to counsel us on the current
state of the law, to gather information through legal discovery and
to advocate the City's position when we felt that a claim was unmer-
itorious. We would not rely on them to investigate or adjust
claims.
COST CONTROL
aWe
would constantly review vendors for cost-effectiveness. With
regard to investigations, assignments would be limited to specific
'
tasks. Original, itemized statements would be required on all bill-
u
i 6.
e) Claims Opened During
the Month
ings. We would perform cost comparisons of different vendors pro-
alphabetical
viding the same service. Work would be directed to vendors provid-
listing.
ing the best service at the lowest price.
STATISTICAL REPORTS
Statistical reports, generated in columnar format by our computer,
the Month
would be provided to the City. They would summarize overall results
alphabetical
and depict individual claims and transactions.
listing.
We would provide the following reports as a part of the program:
a) Detail Report (Monthly) - A list of all claims segregated by
policy year. This type of report is usually required by excess
insurers. For each claim, it shows the policy year, case number
(we assign), claimant's name, cause of loss description, date of
loss, allocation code (yours), type of loss (i.e. auto property
Samples of these reports
damage), status (i.e. litigated), losses paid to date, expenses
in Appendix C.
paid to date, reserves, and total incurred.
b) Allocation Report (Quarterly) - A list of all claims segregated
basic fee.
by allocation code. This report shows the same information as
'
above. You can distribute it to your department heads and/or
use it to allocate self-insurance costs to their budgets. This
will often motivate them to become more interested in your risk
'
management goals.
c) Summary Report (Monthly) - A summary for each year by type of
loss. This report is useful when shopping for excess liability
'
insurance.
d) Check Register (Monthly) - A list of all transactions made
during the month. This report is useful to the City's Finance
Department in reconciling the trust account. It shows the check
number, check date, amount, payee, type of payment (i.e. attor-
ney fees), policy year, case number, allocation code and claim-
ant.
i 6.
e) Claims Opened During
the Month
(Monthly) - An
alphabetical
listing.
f) Claims Closed During
the Month
(Monthly) - An
alphabetical
listing.
g) Active Liability Litigation (Monthly) - A listing of cases by
defense firm.
Samples of these reports
are found
in Appendix C.
These reports
would be included in our
basic fee.
In addition,
the City would
i 6.
fl
i
r
0
u
0
0
u
0
u
u
purchase specialized reports. Furthermore, we have the capability
of providing data on magnetic media for direct use in spreadsheet,
database and word processing programs.
INSURANCE
Certificates of Insurance would be provided to the City as evidence
that we carry the following coverages:
a) $1,000,000 General & Professional Liability Insurance
b) $500,000 Commercial Blanket Bond (Fidelity)
In addition to the above coverages, we maintain Workers'
Compensation insurance for our own employees and property insurance
for our office and computer equipment.
ALLOCATED EXPENSES
Services not covered by our fee are: check printing, Index Bureau
membership, field investigation, legal expenses, court reporter
expenses, property damage appraisals, professional photography,
professional map making, remote photocopy, messenger service,
medical experts, engineering experts, accident reconstruction
experts, economists, rehabilitation specialists, and translators.
Field investigators are currently charging $32 to $40 per hour plus
mileage and other expenses. Most law firms now charge between $90
and $125 per hour. The other allocated expense items vary widely
in cost. Before incurring any extraordinary allocated expense, we
would first obtain your approval.
CONCLUSION
Thank you for this opportunity to present our program. Should you
have any questions about it, please feel free to contact us.
COLEN & LEE INC.
- 7 -
APPENDIX A - CLIENT :REFERENCES
CITY OF ARCADIA, (818) 574-5405
' Michael Miller, City Attorney
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
' Workers' Compensation since August 1, 1985
Liability since July 1, 1987
'
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, (818) 960-4011
Nadja Cole, Personnel Manager
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, California 91706
'
Workers' Compensation & Liability Since October 1, 1982
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, (213) 550-4929
Roy Clarke, Risk Manager
'
450 North Crescent Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Workers' Compensation since October 1, 1982
'
CITY OF CHINO, (714) 591-9807
Carlotta Clark, Personnel Operations Manager
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, California 91710
Liability since June 1, 1984
Workers' Compensation since July 1, 1986
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, L. A. COUNTY, (818) 260-2098
Dawna Allen, Administrative Analyst
'
2525 Corporate Center Place
Monterey Park, California 91754
Workers' Compensation since November 1, 1986
CITY OF CULVER CITY, (213) 202-5742
Joe Pannone, City Attorney
9770 Culver Boulevard
Culver City, California 90230
Liability since July 1, 1984
Workers' Compensation since March 1, 1986
' CITY OF DOWNEY, (213) 869-7331
Chris Birch, Personnel Director
' 11111 Brookshire Avenue
Downey, California 90241
Workers' Compensation since October 1, 1982
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, (213) 322-4670
Julia Abreu, Legal Assistant
350 Main Street
E1 Segundo, California 90245
Liability since July 1, 1988
' CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, (213) 545-5621
Dan Pliszka, Risk Manager
1400 Highland Avenue
' Manhattan Beach, California 90266
Workers' Compensation & Liability since October 1, 1984
' CITY OF MONROVIA, (818) 359-3231
Bettye Logans, Risk Manager
415 South Ivy Avenue
Monrovia, California 91016-2888
' Liability since May 1, 1988
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, (714) 741-5011
'
Steve Larson, Organizational & Personnel Director
11391 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, California 92642
'
Workers' Compensation since October 1, 1988
GARDEN GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, (714) 663-6133
Art Becker, Business Manager
10331 Stanford Avenue
Garden Grove, California 92640
'
Liability since October 1, 1988
CITY OF INDUSTRY, (818) 333-2211
Philip Iriarte, City Clerk
'
Post Office Box 3366
City of Industry, California 91744
Liability since July 1, 1988
'
CITY OF INGLEWOOD, (213) 412-5372
Howard Rosten, City Attorney
One Manchester Boulevard
Inglewood, California 90301
Liability since October 1, 1982
' CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, (213) 545-5621
Dan Pliszka, Risk Manager
1400 Highland Avenue
' Manhattan Beach, California 90266
Workers' Compensation & Liability since October 1, 1984
' CITY OF MONROVIA, (818) 359-3231
Bettye Logans, Risk Manager
415 South Ivy Avenue
Monrovia, California 91016-2888
' Liability since May 1, 1988
L
' CITY OF MONTCLAIR, (714) 626-8571
Christine Hayes, Personnel Officer
' 5111 Benito Street
Montclair, California 91763
Workers' Compensation since November 1, 1987
' CITY OF MONTEBELLO, (213) 725-1200
Ron Chan, Risk Manager
1600 Beverly Boulevard
' Montebello, California 90640
Liablity since January 1, 1987
' CITY OF POMONA, (714) 620-2296
Eugene Light, Risk Manager
505 South Garey Avenue
Pomona, California 91769
Liability since January 1, 1984
Workers' Compensation since January 1, 1985
' CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, (213) 372-1171
Judy Durham, Risk Management Administrator
415 Diamond Street
' Redondo Beach, California 90277
Workers' Compensation since April 1, 1983
Liability since October 1, 1983
'
CITY OF SAN FERNANDO, (818) 898-1220
Jane Herran, Personnel Director
117 Macneil Street
'
San Fernando, California 91340-2993
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, (818) 572-6165
Jack Guiso, Director of Administrative Services
9150 Flair Drive
El Monte, California 91731
Workers' Compensation since July 1, 1986
'
CITY OF UPLAND, (714) 982-1352
Phyllis Proctor, Finance Director
460 North Euclid Avenue
'
Upland, California 91786
Liability since July 1, 1988
CITY OF VERNON, (213) 583-8811
Edward Cooney, Risk Manager
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
Workers' Compensation & Liability since October 1, 1986
- 10 -
CITY OF WEST COVINA, (818) 814-8438
Erin Hoppe, Risk Manager
' 1444 West Garvey Avenue
West Covina, California 91793
Workers' Compensation since November 1, 1986
WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, (213) 698-8121
Carleen Fiske, Administrative Secretary
9401 South Painter Avenue
Whittier, California 90605
Workers' Compensation since September 15, 1986
i
r
C
r
n
APPENDIX B - SAMPLE
LIABILITY SELF-INSURANCE
SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1989 between
the , hereinafter referred to as the "City," and COLEN
& LEE, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the
"Administrator."
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken to self -insure its general and
auto liability; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator is engaged in the business of
administering general and auto liability self-insurance programs: and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the services of the
Administrator to administer a general and auto liability self-insurance
program, hereinafter referred to as the "Program," for the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City hereby retains the services of the
Administrator and the Administrator agrees to perform services for the
City under the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
1. TERM: This Agreement shall become effective as of
and shall continue in effect until terminated by the cancellation
provision set forth herein.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES: The Administrator agrees to supervise and
administer the Program for the City and shall act as the City's
- 12 -
N
i
representative in connection with the investigation, adjustment and
administration of all general and auto liability claims asserted by
third parties against the City. The administrator further agrees to
provide the City, during the term of this Agreement, all services
more particularly set forth herein.
3. CONFERENCES: The Administrator shall meet with City staff
at the beginning of the Program to develop procedures consistent with
City policy and to provide orientation and training to City employees
involved in the administration of the Program. Thereafter, the
Administrator shall meet with City staff as needed to discuss claims and
general procedures.
4. CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION: The Administrator agrees to provide
supervisory, administrative and adjustment services on liability claims
asserted against the City. Such services shall include:
A. Screening accident reports for potential claims and initiating
contact with claimants.
B. Establishing files and setting reserves on new cases.
C. Maintaining contact with claimants or their attorneys.
D. Deciding upon and initiating a proper course of investigation.
E. Periodically reviewing cases for disposition and proper
reserving.
F. Determining fault.
G. Seeking contribution or indemnity from responsible third
parties.
- 13 -
1
H. Evaluating damages and determining settlement value.
1
I. Preparing reports recommending settlement in
written when
'
excess of the Administrator's authority or when recommending rejection
or denial of a claim.
J. Negotiating Settlements.
K. Taking releases from claimants.
1
L. Initiating payment of settlements and expenses.
M. Sending denial letters to claimants or their attorneys when
appropriate.
'
N. Notifying the City's excess liability insurers/pools of all
claims which exceed or may exceed the City's self-insurance retention,
maintaining liaison between the City and its excess liability insurers/
pools on matters affecting the adjustment of such claims and arranging
for reimbursement to the City of losses in excess of its self-insurance
'
retention.
0. Closing files when appropriate to do so.
5. INVESTIGATION: The Administrator agrees to provide investi-
gative services as follows:
A. The Administrator shall conduct office investigation, through
' the mail and over the phone, which shall include: obtaining written
questionnaires or telephone recorded statements from City employees,
claimants and witnesses; obtaining police and other official reports;
obtaining medical reports from claimants, their doctors or their
attorneys; obtaining wage loss information from claimants, their
1 - 14 -
6. LITIGATION MANAGEMENT: The Administrator agrees to provide the
following services with regard to litigated claims:
' A. Upon service of a law suit against the City with respect to
a liability claim, the Administrator shall refer the claim to a defense
attorney who is acceptable to and approved 'by the City.
B. The Administrator, in coordination with the City, shall
supervise and confer with defense attorneys during all stages of
1 litigation to assist attorneys in preparing cases and to ensure optimal
return on legal effort.
tC. The Administrator shall audit and approve all legal expenses.
' D. The Administrator shall continue all claims administration and
1 - 15 -
employers or their attorneys; and all other investigation that can be
1
handled effectively from the office.
B. The Administrator shall engage, on behalf of the City, the
services of independent, outside investigators to conduct all field
investigation that is needed to properly handle general and auto
'
be
liability claims. The selection of outside investigators shall made
from a list approved by the City.
C. The Administrator shall, without compromising the quality of
'
investigation, make every attempt to conduct as much investigation from
the office as possible before engaging the services of outside
'
investigators in the that investigation is
and, event outside necessary,
'
shall closely control outside investigators to minimize expense.
D. Outside investigation fees shall be considered an allocated
'
expense.
6. LITIGATION MANAGEMENT: The Administrator agrees to provide the
following services with regard to litigated claims:
' A. Upon service of a law suit against the City with respect to
a liability claim, the Administrator shall refer the claim to a defense
attorney who is acceptable to and approved 'by the City.
B. The Administrator, in coordination with the City, shall
supervise and confer with defense attorneys during all stages of
1 litigation to assist attorneys in preparing cases and to ensure optimal
return on legal effort.
tC. The Administrator shall audit and approve all legal expenses.
' D. The Administrator shall continue all claims administration and
1 - 15 -
1
investigation functions.
r
7. STATISTICAL REPORTS: The Administrator agrees to provide,
during the term of this Agreement, the City with a monthly
statistical report showing the status of each claim reported to the
rAdministrator, the details of each claim, the remaining reserves for each
claim and the details of all claims payments made to date and during the
month. This report shall be delivered to the City within twenty (20)
rdays of the close of each calendar month.
'
S. ALLOCATED EXPENSES: The City agrees to pay for check
printing, Index Bureau membership, outside adjusters, outside
' investigators, defense attorneys, legal costs, police and other official
reports, remote photocopy, professional photographers, map makers,
rfilm makers, medical experts, engineering experts, accident
rreconstruction experts process service, messenger service, court
reporters, vocational rehabilitation experts, structured settlement
rconsultants and translators.
r9. CONSIDERATION: The City agrees to pay a service fee to the
Administrator based on the monthly sum of _
as compensation for ongoing services rendered under this Agreement. Once
' a year thereafter, the Administrator may increase or decrease the service
fee by giving sixty (60) days written notice of the change to the City.
' 10. INDEMNIFICATION: The Administrator shall indemnify, hold
' harmless, and defend the City from all claims, legal actions, losses,
r - 16 -
expenses, injuries or damages arising out of the Administrator's actual
or alleged negligence or intentional wrongdoing incident to the
performance of this agreement.
11. INSURANCE: The Administrator agrees to maintain in force at
all times the following insurance:
A. Workers` Compensation Insurance covering employees of the
Administrator, as required by law.
B. General and Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of
One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), naming the City as an additional
insured.
C. A Commercial Blanket Bond in the amount of Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00).
D. The City shall be notified, in writing, thirty (30) days
prior to any cancellation or reduction in the above coverage.
12. CANCELLATION: This Agreement may be terminated by either
party giving to the other, in writing, notice of its intention to cancel
this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of
termination.
13. RECORDS: The Administrator agrees to establish and maintain,
for a period of not less than five (5) years, claim files, logs,
transaction documents and all other records associated with the Program.
These records shall be the property of the City and shall be
available, on five (5) days notice, for review or transfer to another
- 17 -
1
destroyed
custodian. These records shall not be disposed of or without
'
the prior, express authorization of the City.
'
14. NOTICES: All notices, demands, requests, or approvals which
are required under this Agreement, or which either the City or the
'
Administrator may desire to serve upon the other, shall be in writing
and shall be conclusively deemed served when delivered personally, or
forty-eight (48) hours after the deposit thereof in the United States
Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as herein
provided.
A. All notices, demands, requests or approvals from the
Administrator to the City shall be addressed to (name and
' address of City).
B. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from the City
tto the Administrator shall be given to Colen & Lee, Inc., 1930 South Brea
Canyon Road, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California 91765.
15. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR: All communications to the City
' shall be given to
i16. WARRANTY: The Administrator warrants and guarantees that all
services performed hereunder for the City shall be performed in a
manner commensurate with the highest professional standards.
17. ENTIRE CONTRACT: This instrument contains the entire
Agreement between the parties relating to the rights herein granted and
obligations herein assumed. Any oral representations or modifications
I - 18 -
i
1
concerning this instrument shall be of no force or effect. Subsequent
modifications may be made in writing.
18. GOVERNING LAW: The validity of this Agreement and of any of
its terms and provisions shall be interpreted and construed pursuant to
the laws of the State of California.
19. ATTORNEY FEES: If any action at law or equity, including an
action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the
provisions of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney fees in addition to any other relief to which it may
be entitled if it prevails.
20. ASSIGNMENT: The Administrator shall not assign, sublet or
transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights,
burdens, duties or obligations of this Agreement without the prior,
written consent of the City.
21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The Administrator agrees not to accept
any employment during the term of this Agreement from any other person,
' firm or corporation if that employment is likely to result in a conflict
between the interests of the City and interests of any third parties.
i
22. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: If any provision of this Agreement is
held by a competent court to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and
effect.
- 19 -
EXECUTED at , California on the date and year first above
written.
(NAME OF CITY)
By
Mayor
- 20 -
COZEN & LEE, INC.
By
Gary M. Lee
r
APPENDIX C - SAMPLE STATISTICAL REPORTS
On the following pages are samples of statistical reports which we
provide as part of our program. Special reports are available. Ask for
details.
l
0
fl
H
C
r
- 21 -
11
u
0
r
CD
0
LU
r
z
w
f
w
O
r
Q
i
n
0
amo m
m
3 c
- m E
m u rt
x N in
C-3 % 4-
0 o
co a
LL +
O O U
¢ 1
o a
'
z
o r
m
o E
z
O
r
Q
i
n
0
amo m
m
3 c
- m E
m u rt
x N in
C-3 % 4-
0 o
co a
LL +
O O U
¢ 1
o a
'
¢ V
o r
C
O J
Y m
r ¢
U J
O
r
Q
i
n
0
amo m
m
3 c
- m E
m u rt
x N in
C-3 % 4-
0 o
co a
LL +
O O U
¢ 1
U
aD
O)
r•1
N
M
V
N
O
n
W
O N
N
F
O
d
F
Z
W
£
W
O
Q
Z
m
F
N
O £
Z
W
L
£ J
U
O
U
.Q
z
.rF.
O
E
O J
W
N
tl
Fes- ¢
J
O
U J
F
N
t
t
C
.4-
+4-
f-
4-
ro
ro
F
J
N
O
O
L
O N
N
da
ti
O
rt
•�
m
N
T
Q N
41
cc
W
C
O
N
Y
U
N
N
Ol
O7
Z
WU
U
O
4-
a
N
G
U
C
N
G
vl
O
J
C
41y.
y
yi
Ul N
C,
\
O
U
r
J
J J
o
N
c
U
m
2
m
m
•m ro
F
lJ
N
}
U
U
U
U
U U
U
aD
O)
M
2
U W
f d
'
r
= N
U w
0 (J
f d
F --
z
0
d
z
O
N
m C-
C)
0
41
C
Q) 4'
m a)
Ta z
L E-=
ro a)
0
C C
N L
T L 0
r a) N
a-0 0 C
O +
O L
m d 4-
0CD
L L N
m a) N
L L
+� 11
ce
N
H �
m D_
00
O L N
7 a)
Q 3 0
a w
� I I
\ w
6
a
al
a) .0
rn ro
T ro Ot
10
L E
r
C J
�4� 11
NrL
J
a0 0
O
OL
m Cl.
co
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m W
e2i W J
000
O
0000
O
O
J
> Q
OOC>
O
0000
O
O
W 66
Z W OO
O O
O
O O O 117
LC!
Lf!
K
Q Z
W M r
E W
O O
O O
O
C
OL!!C>
L!7 N Lr
h
h
h
1�
V)
oo
Cl. U
W J
>Q
O m 0
O1 -Ln
00
N
0 0 0 0
0000
O
O
m
N
W O
Cl N .--i
V
Cl Ill O O
Ln
m
N r
W
N l f!
O t0
h
CD
O co 0 Cl
Ln h Lf! to
M
N
O
17
me
M ti
O
Lf! M N
N
N
tD
h
ti
t10
W W
0000
00
000 O
O
W
IN>
O h to
N
0000
O
N
Z
W W
0 0i .-1
Cl u7 0 0
L[!
O
CL to
w
N If)
O m
h
tP
O 00 O
f! Vt L .
00
LO
.--�
w
cn
Op
N
M
N
N
V! W
0 0 0
O
0 0 0 0
O
O
N"!
000
O
0000
O
O
OOf
J W
O O O
O
O O O Cd
O
O
W
C
O
o N L<,t
h
h
W
N
N
Lf! M
00
O
CL
LP!
Lf!
m
Y
r
N
O
r J
O N O
N
O O O CI
O
N
J
Z Q
O N LC!
h
0 0 0 0
O
h
O
w r
f Cl
CI n CO
Ln
0 LC) o LCI
C,
10
Z
Q
> r
Q
h Q
O! m
N
M
.-+ N
L!7
V
Ln
O
W
tY LC
CL
N
•1
m w
Y
v
a Y
om
Y
W
Cl N Cl
N
O O O O
Cl
N
O d
Z
O N Lf!
h
99 O CI
O
1�
E
W
O h too
Lf!
O O C,
O
o�
M
x
w
rnm
M
M
>
r N
+
U Lam+
U
Y W to
000
O
0000
O
O
Y
r
restn
zQo
Ooo0
0000
O
o
W$ _..1
C0 0 0
O
O O O Lf1
Lf!
Lf!
J
CLQ
O D
N
N
N
r
�
J
> Y N
0 0 0
O
0 0 C. 0
O
O
t1� tN
O O O
Cl
O O O C)
O
O
=D O
O"7 J
O 00
O
0000
O
O
O Z
In H
O
LO
O
Lt)
O
L17
.J
O N'-1
M
00 OO
O
M
Z Q W
J
1 W Q
Q
Uto
O J
O
O O O C1
O
M
U I
-w-I
1 r!
Z
N
11
O
co
.ti .-1 N a -i
V
h
Z W
M
N
M
CL Q
O U
O
O
co
O
O
O
O
co
O
Q W
LA
O
r U
co
h
Q
co
Q
M
2
co
1
o
R
r
O
co
o
1
r
O
J
U w
co
w N
a to
m
co
_ \_
o
r
m
h<
m
\_ _
a
r
m
Q
r
Q
a
YLL O
r 0 J
-M
—
a -m m
4 0 0
O
to
m
ri
m m m o_
Q ct O C)
O
to
O
r
r w
Q d Q Q
00 W
J
O
2
NN Na -i -.SN
0 0 0 0 0 0
GW 10
C. 0 0 0 Cl
K
d w
to
Q
1.
W J
U
z0
3- z
oort-zz
Q' O
0 0 0 Q z 0
O- U
W
r
ID 1.0 ID
c0'00 00 00 co 00
MM M M Cl) co
2 0 Cl Cl 0 0
M
V
LU
2 WC> Ov M V (O
� LD m 0 0 0 0 0 Cl
X: 0 0 O O O O
00 00 00
n
LO
[O
M
d
O
H
w
W LU W
1.
z0
3- z
oort-zz
0 0 0 Q z 0
J W — J
Q
N to to Z O.'OD
W W= Z Of =
Li
U
U U O Inc=
O'_
uj
H
N
C0
V] V]
W W
W
O
W W W w
W
Cn Ll U- N W
Y
cnO H WLL
U
ui
O W O! 0-
2c =
m U
z
O
\�- a w
N O X F-
O
�-
W W W d (Q0
C:,
a
W ceJNO'--�
QN U H
Q =
U
JF-OOtn
u
W
O F
} Q
HJ
U
J
[O
Q
J
N
ce
W r
N O D W
L
2 O W Q
S W Z V) Q
<
O O Z 2:
C O W O
F- W U! - U
a3Km N<
W >-Q
OO22tn of
W
ti g J w W LL
W
J Q 2 0
Jo2j
Q
d
C~¢ p
2E 0]GU�
N O 0 0 Cl 0
F
N 0 0 0 0 to
Z
N O L co
J
O
-.T
Cf)00 — cli .--i O
C%i
00 r-1 N
f
Q
CoNN 0000
co
W
00 00 co c0 00 00 \ \ \ \ \
\
Q
In O Otn
0 0 0 0 .--i .ti
MM M M Cl) co
2 0 Cl Cl 0 0
M
V
LU
2 WC> Ov M V (O
� LD m 0 0 0 0 0 Cl
X: 0 0 O O O O
00 00 00
n
LO
[O
M
d
O
H
W
Z�
Z Z J
C) -D
w >
J C U
J
d Q W
U
Q m E
Y
n n n
00 NN
r w
mw
J
W o2f
Q Z
d W
WJ
KO
O- U
F -
Z
O
E
N
K 2
m ~
In
W
Z N
O O
f J
Q U
0 N
w�
O 4
J
r U
H
U Fr—
J
m
Q
J
co
00
W
cn I U U U
Q
Cn
J O O O
O O O LO
I— N
W O p O
N O O O
W O O O
W
N I 0 0 O
N O O O
O
J O O c[)
N
W
d O �
I— O Q O
I— I 00 O
d N
W O Cl O C) p
fm O O O
O
K Z
Q �
Y U O
J 0_
N 3 w
O w Y
J occr
W EnR Z
O W
W W r~ Q
N 9Li
2 F
Q Z fe
W O W Q
U U 3
W J ti
J J J <
J W O Q
Q W 4. U
W
— c0 to 10
Q co 41 00
O \ \ \
O V N
[ n co O N
O
CD \\\
Onrn
J 0 0 O
w
Z
Z
CD
co
co
IT
J
Cl
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
L'
O
O
O
O
O
O
h
N
O
N
N
U
CO
to
W
co
O
OO
O
O
LL
Z O
IY
W
N
ON
W
W
Ln
Lo
W m
O f
N
(D
N
tr
tD
[�
W
N
O
N
O
O
N
�n
N
O
N
1.f1
11'1
W
J
h
O
h
GD
co
Ll
J
h
h
dV
co
m
O
U
rn
rn
In
O
o
o
b
o
N
O
O
O
O
O
OJ
O
O
O
O
Cl
K
co"DCO
r
O
Q
Q
Ib
W
co
J
W
m
M
\
M
N
1'
\
st
Q
VI
N
N
W
O
J
J
\
rn
\
m
F-
\
m
�
0
0
0
co
4 F--
co
Oco
coo
ago
W E
m
\\
M
M
me
\
r
t�
N
N
N
N LL
O
N
U
N
\
\
OJ
\
00
\
ce
\
N
f
O
O
O O
O
O
7
II
11
W
U W
n
¢
W N
LL Q
U
W U
O
LL
O
LL
Z O
IY
H R'
W
N W
m
S
W m
O f
N
Z
Z Z
O_
V1
O
�n
J
LL
J
Cl
O
U
W
N
r
r
Z
U
K
K
r
O
Q
Q
W
W
C7
W
W
N
1'
W
v7
VI
W
J
J
J
F-
4 F--
co
Oco
f
W E
en
2�O
me
N
r
t�
LL
r
N
N LL
to
C>00
N
\
\
f
N
\
ce
O
O O
O
7
LL
a2f
LL
AS
J
W
J
O
r
O
C7
O
r
O
¢
J
r
--
r
2
d
I
1
W
r -i
Z
C'
O
Q
C
O
LL
LL
Z
W
uj
W
N
¢
E
(n
Z
w W
r
W
F -
fn
¢
-C
Q
LLI
W
(f)
W
W
LL
fJJ
—j
U
LLI
0
V U
O
tm
U
U
00 W
J
F-
w
w di
h
I
J
J
J
Q Z
p
Q
O
O
O
D U
O
O
O
O
�-
O
Ln
O
117
O
O
f.,
N
N
fD
W W
00
O
O
Z
W W
N
O
f1 (n
W
N
117
O
u7
�f1
In
f0
C
O
N
IT
} W W
O
�a�
d Q N
O
O 9= W
w w
O
1
N
J >
O
O "=7 W OCD
Oz <n
O
K
in w
O
W
�p
�
O
f
LO
Z
W
N
O
i
n
Z
N
V7
4
J
W
a
n
co
V
U
X
m
M
W
¢
4
m of
} w n
ow
cu
ad¢ o
Z }
O
W f J
1 Q
f }
Q m
O
a'
O W
f1
w I
O
r
J N
O M-
} J
HO
H O
7 J
cn U f
10
Q
U
}
o
J
11 fn
Y w O
O J
m
O
m
m
O
m
O
Q
O
MH
O
O
O
O
O
0-
W
.-1
O
.--I
O
N
O
'-1
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(O
CO
to
1D
to
00
a0
co
00LOa0
IA
LO
N U
O
h- C)
W
w
O
\
M
\
C3 o O
.N-1
.N-1
0 0
Cl
O
cncn
J
Q
W
in
K
V
Y
N
O
Z
O
O
J
Q
^
O
O
Y
w
O
U-
O
J
O_
(n
W
O
LO
O
U
~
m
w
N
0
H
H
W
n-1 Z
2
W
>
N
Q
VI
O W
f W
Z
Of
Z_
F
U
O
w
Of
Elf
c¢n Of
OU U
U
Z
no
0o
fm
H w
o
o
¢
¢
w
- fn
¢
X W
2 z
O o
O
LL
c0
= IM
oe W
w w
cn K
U
'�
J
O
ti
H J
N Q
F-- J
NQ
J F
C7Z
w J
Of
W O
- J
W W
tom+
MU
m
Q
l�
W
S
a0
1
O
U W
W -
O
00
Q
m
Q
Q
Q
D
Q Q
f1
Q O
I U Z I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
0
LA o 0 0 0
N O O LO O
LO LO N Ln
N V LO
p
a
p
p
H
0
0
o
a
a
0
0
0
o
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
N lY
O
O
O
O
O
O U
Po W
10
^
n
h W
2
\ H
N J
N O
\
m
O
\
m
N
--
\
V N
N in
I f-
OLO
r
—
\ Q
m
m
e
p
W
p
Z
Y
U
Z
6
J
a
LU
d
~
F-
N
¢ r
C,
a
v
o
o wz
x
r
no
z z w�_
Y
m
w
a
z
of IQ-
w 3
=
uj w
N
zo
Y
zz
.a+s F
BGG
Ce F -
m
J
O N
0
Ln3
Q Q
U�
O
�wOf
"] Q
a' O
3 H La
Lo Lu fk!
N Z Q
N J
J W
r H ti
O U
U
W
=Q
LL
In
Q
a'U
m
Z U J
f Li
m
O
n Q
Q
Q
Q
Q p
co
4
21 O
O
O
o
O
0
O
0 .zWi
O
J J
O O O O
O O O O
O O O LO
OO O N
Ii
LIl Lt7
h N N
co O O
h O O
N O O
N O O
LC1 Lf7 Ln
LO N N
N
N
h
In
O (t]
CO
m d
Q Cl
O
O O
Q
W 4
W
w
ff1
U_
CD
fJ
J
I
O
W
U ce
F --
C,
O
m
N z
o Q
= =
O
W
U
U
W U
V
W LO
W O
r 4.
D
h h
f
W
Y
CO
J
O
Q
A
J
m N
O N
D O
O O
N
K W
N
W
Z fn
O
Q o-'
U ce
ce a'
S
H
Q
Q
Q N
N
J J
N
JH
W
d
C LQL
LQL
Q U
w
d'
W
W W
U 2
�+ Y
O
Q
W 4
J 1x
w
ff1
K ]L
CD
fJ
I
W
W
U ce
F --
C,
O
n
N z
o Q
= =
O
Cl m
U
U
W U
F-
W LO
to
w
h h
M: 00
co
CO
a0 OD
K V
Q O
A
LP
m N
O N
D O
O O
�
a
p
d
a'
CO
[O
D
tl] d
O C; O
Q
Q O
a
W
C
Q
U
f
p
z
w
p
U
O
m U
N
w
LU
J
J
p
Q
W
in
C0
p
a'
Z
O
^�
DO
c7
Y
0
Z
N
w
U
Q
in
\ Y
F
1-
H
x
Z J
m
C7
3
t-
�
N W
p
U
O
J
J N
H
W
K
O
fa
cc
U Z
W
O
Z
Q 2
Z .LL.
O_ W
W
O
d
1
Z
Z
Y LL
U
W Z
Q
m
N O
ck�
w
K
{-
p
W J
F-
m
C
Y W
~
w
4
w
N
Y
a'
O
3 W
a
W
L�
f
U z
z
z
Q
O
m U
Z
Z
W
J
J
Z
2
a
C0
7
3
O
^�
N
Q
^'7
N
J
O O
W
C
U
U
W
J
M
O O
m
Or
Q
W
a
O p
Q
m
E
Q
H
Z
W (O
CO
10
noo
h
OD
oo
00
co
K N
Q N
O
M
n
i
N
aj
N
W co
Mi
m
C
N
N
N
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
!A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 FOR THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE I OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE, UNDER PROTEST
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the
State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure
approved by the people at the special statewide election held
on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual
appropriations subject to limitation of each local government
shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for
the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and
population except as otherwise specifically provided for in
said Article; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9
(commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government
Code of the State of California to implement Irticle XIII B of
the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides
that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction
shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for
the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a
regularly schedJOY)meeting or a noticed special meeting.
Fifteen days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the
determination of the appropriation limit Shall be available to
the public; and,
WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) and 7902.6 of the
Government Code sets forth the method for determining the
appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction fcr the 1989-
90 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
wishes to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year
1985-1990 for the City of Diamond Bar.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar, California, as folio-,qs:
Section 1.- That it is hereby found and determined that; the
documentation used in the determination of the appropriations
limit for the City of Diamond Bar for fiscal year 1989-90 was
available to the public in the City Offices of said City at
least fifteen days prior to this date.
Section 2.. That the County of Los Angeles LAFCO, established
the appropriations for the newly incorporated City and that
limit is protested by the City.
Section 3. That the appropriations limit for the City of
Diamond Bar as established in accordance with Section 7902 (a)
and 7902.6 of the California Government Code is 19,882,416
under protest.
Section 4. That the Mayor of the City of Diamond Bar shall
sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution No. 89 -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar on the day of _ , 1989.
Mayor
I,
r City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, do hcrreby certify that the foregoing Resolution
vas introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar held on the - day of 1
1989, and eras fin4lly passed at a. regular meeting cf the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of
1 1-989, by the following vote.,
AYES - COUNCIL 142,111BERS-
NOES : COU14CIL HEMBERS.
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL HEMBERS:
City.Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar
8,000,000
1987-88
Consumer Price Index 3.04 (476,800)
X = 5.96
Population 1.96 8,476,800
1988-89
Consumer Price Index 3.93 (839,203)
X = 9.90
Population 2.52 9,316,003
1989-90
Consumer Price Index 4.98 (566,413)
X - 6.08
Population 1.22 9,882,416
Note: Figures provided by Department of Finance, State of eaiifarfii2.
Population unincorporated Los Angeles County figure.
r� '1*
PHYLLIS PATEN
Mayor
PAUL V. HORCHER
Mayor Pro Tem
GARY MILLER
GARY WERNER
JOHN FORBING
Councilmembers
ROBERT L. VAN NORT
City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SUITE 330
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
714 -860 -CITY 714-860-2489
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
FROM: Oliver Cunningham, Administrative Intern
SUBJECT: Mileage Reimbursement Rate Policy
DATE: July 6, 1989
It is requested that the City Council consider the
following mileage reimbursement rate policy. The
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allows $.24 per mile
for the authorized use of a private automobile for
City business. The City Manager may authorize such
use at the IRS value. Payments will be based on the
most direct route to and from the destination. (If
neede, parking expenses will also be paid with sub-
mission of receipts).
Oliver Cunningham
Administrative Intern
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
ESTABLISHING A MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RATE POLICY.
WHEREAS the City of Diamond Bar was incorporated
April 18, 1989; and
WHEREAS the City Council and authorized city
employees incur expenses for the use of private automobiles
thus, benefiting the City of Diamond Bar; and
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar, California, as follows:
Section 1. That any council member or city employee
receive full mileage reimbursement of the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) rate�f $.24 per mile; for the authorized use of a
private automobile for City business. In addition, garage or
parking expenses will also be reimbursed upon submission of
receipts. y� cjv(
.� t4o
Section 2. Payments will. be based on the most direct
route to and from the destination. The City Manager may
authorize such use at the current I:RS rate.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar on the _ day of , 1989.
MAYOR
Y
I, _, Deputy City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of
1989, and was finally passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the
day of , 1989, by the following vote:
AYES:
Council
Members:
NOES:
Council
Members:
ABSENT:
Council
Members:
ABSTAINED:
Council
Members:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar
M
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 7, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort
SUBJECT: Purchase of Computer or Accounting Software
BACKGROUND
Since the City's recent incorporation all accounting
records have been produced manually. One of the
primary needs in today's work place is information that
is timely and efficiently produced. This requires the
use of a computer with the ability to process informa-
tion. More importantly, :it requires software with the
ability to process information for users in order to
make effective decisions.
Staff explored a number Of computer accounting software
applications relative to the amount of work needed to
change data from the present configurations to hard
disk, as well as the pitfalls inherent in these
computer applications. Additionally, consideration was
given to the flexibility of the system in order to
adapt to the growing needs of the City.
Inasmuch as independent system modularity was an
important feature, ease of use is also of paramount
concern. Many software products may produce excellent
results, however if the user screens and menus are
difficult to understand, use of the software is
useless.
Additional consideration was given to location and
accessibility of the vendor in order to facilitate
software maintenance support. This is of immense
importance to ensure against interruption and prolonged
down time.
All systems were required to have written training
manuals and training would be conducted on site by a
single individual on a one to one basis. Also, the
staff required that references of current users be
supplied.
-44 . ,4
Computer Applied Systems was selected by staff as the
best computer accounting software system to meet the
City's needs. Several California cities have selected
the Computer Applied Systems software packages
including the cities of La Puente, Ontario, Bell
Gardens and Palm Desert. The staff contacted
references at these locations, including the auditor
for the City of Ontario, and all references were
positive about the software, services and support.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends the purchase of the Computer
Applied Systems accounting software; specifically the
financial reporting and accounts payable modules. It
is further recommended that the purchase of the soft-
ware coincide with the acquisition of the hardware in
order to ensure compatibility.
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
Wafnut Va(fey. ecreation
WVR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Diamond Bar City Council
FROM: Christine Adams, Director of Recreation
DATE: July 11, 1989
SUBJECT: Park Program Update
The summer Parks Program has started out to be a huge success with the community. All parks show
good attendance, and the new staff are enthusiastic and creative.
The program began on June 19, with a major Hog Dog Feed and Balloon Launch at Sycamore Canyon
Park. All the parks had clever activities, including a game which blown up balloons were covered with
shaving cream, and the kids were asked to shave the balloons with plastic knives. Pretty messy, but a
great deal of fun.
The second week of summer was themed "Camp Diamond Bar" and all the park activities involved
outdoor and nature events. The biggest problem that week was that ants got into the marshmellows!
For Week Three, the theme was "Life's A Holiday" and all holidays, such as Easter, Christmas, and 4th
of July were celebrated during this week with various activities.
The beginning of a new program is not without problems, but thankfully, with the help of the City Staff,
we were able to overcome these set -backs. The biggest problem was getting the keys for the buildings
from the county, but we accomplished that by the middle of the second week.
Otherthings that the City Council should be awareof include: ])people are camping out at Summit Ridge
(City staff handled the morning grafiitti quickly) and 2) the lack of shade and tables at Peterson Park is
a problem. The people who live near Peterson Park are very happy to have a program there, but the lack
of shade and tables makes it difficult to run very active programs there. Walnut Valley Recreation has
received many phone calls regarding this from the community.
Average daily attendance:
Maple Hill - 25 Peterson - 20
Grow Park - 25 Summit Ridge - 20
Sycamore Canyon - 30-40 Heritage - 35
Ronald Reagan - 30
Special recognition to Sherri Johnson, Park Coordinator, who is a Diamond Bar resident, and is doing
a wonderful job with her staff.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR URGING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED
STATES TO ADOPT A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
PROHIBITING THE DESECRATION OF THE AMERICAN FLAG.
A. Recitals.
(i) The United States Supreme Court has recently ruled
that one who burns the American flag, as a form of political
statement, may not be prosecuted for desecrating the flag since
such activities are inextricably intertwined with freedoms of
speech set forth in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States.
(ii) The President of the United States and numerous
members of the United States Senate and House of Representatives,
on a bipartisan basis, have urged the introduction of a
Constitutional amendment which would permit the prosecution of a
person for desecrating the American flag notwithstanding the
provisions of the First Amendment do the United States
Constitution.
(iii) The City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
desires to go on record in support of such a Constitutional
amendment.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by
the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this resolution.
2. This City Council hereby urges the United States
Congress to adopt a Constitutional amendment for ratification by
the several States which would permit the enactment of criminal
penalties for desecrating the flag of the United States of America
notwithstanding the provisions of the First Amendment to the
Constitution.
3. The City Clerk shall:
a. Attest to the adoption of this resolution; and
b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to Representative David Dreier and to Senators Alan
Cranston and Pete Wilson urging their support of such a
Constitutional amendment on behalf of the citizens of Diamond Bar
and the State of California.
A OPTED AND APPROVED this, day of , 1989.
Mayor
I, TOMMY NICE, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Diamond
Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar
held on the day of , 1989, and was finally passed at
a regular meeting of the City council of the City of Diamond Bar
held on the day of , 1989, by the following vote:
2
l
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
NX10111DERESMI.4A 3
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk of the
City of Diamond Bar
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -(t� 2 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR APPOINTING LINDA BURGESS, CMC, TO THE POSITION
OF CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
WHEREAS, on April 18, 19139 the City of Diamond Bar
was incorporated, and
WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar to appoint a City Clerk, and
WHEREAS, the City has properly advertised and
recruited for the position of City Clerk, and held the
appropriate interviews with qualified candidates, and
WHEREAS, during the course of said recruitment and
interviews, a fully qualified candidate was chosen as most
suitable for the position,
WHEREAS, said candidate has indicated her ability and
willingness to serve the City of Diamond Bar in the capacity of
City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That LINDA BURGESS, Certified Municipal Clerk,
be appointed City Clerk for the City of Diamond
Bar effective July 17, 1989,
2. That her salary be set at $40,000 per annum, and
3. That the position be classified as an "Exempt"
position, with benefits equal to those provided
to all Management employees in the City of
Diamond Bar.
✓t
2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED--tias day of July, 1989.
Mayor
I, ROBERT L. VAN NORT, Acting City Clerk of the City
of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
July, 1989, by the following vote Ito -wit:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
Acting City Clerk
PHYLLIS PAPEN
h1avor
PAUL V. HORCHER
Mayo, Pro Tem
GARY ;,TILLER
GARY WERNER
JOHN FORBING
Councilmemhers
GEORGE CASWELL
Cil Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SUITE 330
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
714 -860 -CITY 714-860-2489
June 15, 1989
TO: Rudy Lackner
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Manager
RE: Notice of Intent Draft Environmental Impact Report
The City of Walnut has submitted for our review and
comment the attatched Notice of Intent Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report. Please prepare an analyses on
the report, if any, to the City of Diamond Bar for
Council (Planning Commission) review at their June 27,
1989 meeting.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Van Nort
City Manager
R.L.V.N./ch
cc: Council
CITY OF WALNUT
WALNUT, CALIFORNIA
P2
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
Date: May 5, 1989
Subject: Notice Of intent To Prepare A
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Project Title: Walnut General Plan Amendment 10-89 And Zone Change 30-89
Applicant: The William Lyon Company
19 Corporate Plaza
P.O: Box 7520
Newport Beach, CA 92658-7520
The City of Walnut has conducted an Initial Study for the subject project and has determined that an
Environmental impact Report is necessary. The City of Walnut will be the Lead Agency for the subject
project and will prepare the EIR. In order for the concerns of your agency to be incorporated into the
Draft EIR, we need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental
information relevant to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project.
Your agency must consider the EIR prepared by the City of Walnut when considering your permit or
approval for the project. The project description, location, and an analysis indicating the probable
environmental effects of the proposed action are contained in the attached materials.
Pursuant to Section 2108.4 of CEQA, your response must be sent as soon as possible but not later than
30 days after receipt of this notice.
If any significant changes in the proposed project occur, we will advise you. If you have need for
additional information, contact George Shindo, Planning Director, the City of Walnut at 598-5241.
Attachment: Initial Study
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Request
The proposed project is a general plan amendment and zone change for development of a
mixed-use, master planned community.
The proposed general plan amendment would amend the existing general plan designation
for the project site from Hillside Single family Residential at .6 dwelling units per acre
(DU/AC) to Hillside Single Family Residential at 1.28 DU/AC. Additionally, the proposed
general plan amendment would provide for onsite commercial and open space land uses.
The proposed zone change would amend the existing zoning designation for the site from
RPD 61,700 at .6 DU/AC to RPD 32,670 at 1.28'DU/AC. Additionally, the proposed zone
change would provide appropriate zoning for proposed commercial and open space land
uses.
Associated with approval of the proposed general plan amendment and zone change would
be subsequent tentative tract map and site plan approvals.
Project Location and Setting
The proposed project site encompasses approximately 551 acres of land that is located in
the westerly portion of the city of Walnut. Exhibits 1 and 2 show the regional and local
location of the proposed project site. As shown, the site is located within the San Jose
Hills, adjacent to and easterly of the BKK Landfill, northerly and adjacent to Amar Road
and westerly of Grand Avenue.
The project site primarily consists of hillside terrain, with a northeasterly trending ridge
located in the northern half of the site. The maximum on-site relief, measured from the
southern boundary along Amar Road to the major ridgeline is approximately 530 feet.
The project site is currently being utilized for cattle ranching activities. Onsite
vegetation consists primarily of light to moderate growth of native grasses, native
shrubs, chaparral type brush, and small trees located in the lower canvons.
Proposed Land Uses
The proposed general plan amendment and zone change would permit development of a
mixed-use, master planned community. The land use plan for the project is shown on
Exhibit 3. The land use plan provides for the development of 695 hillside -single family
detached dwellings on 319.5 acres, 9.5 acres of commercial uses, 5 acres of Inn/Hotel
uses and 217.5 acres of open space consisting of 94 acres of golf course facilities and
123.5 acres of natural or passive open space. Associated with the open space areas of the
Project would be a combination of equestrian facilities and a network of equestrian
trails.
Access to the project site would be provided by Amar Road and Lemon Avenue. The
onsite circulation system would provide access from Arnar Road to the northern portions
of the site. Grading for the project would be contoured and landscaped to blend with the
surrounding hills_
gf m 8881'00 L
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The following is an environmental evaluation of the proposed project in accordance with
Section 15063 of the State CERA Guidelines. Pursuant to CERA requirements,
explanations are provided for all maybe, yes, and no impacts.
1. EARTH (a,g)
The proposed project site is located within the San Jose Hills. The City of Walnut's
General Plan identifies that a number of areas within the San Jose Hills are susceptible
to landslides. Additionally, the general plan indicates that the project site is regionally
located in an area subject to potential ground shaking from earthquakes. Therefore,
residents and property within the proposed project site could be subject to landslide
hazards and seismic shaking,
The EIR for the project will analyze regional and onsite soil and geologic conditions or
hazards and seismic conditions which may affect proposed land uses. Mitigation measures
will be presented to mitigate potential geotechnical hazards.
1. EARTH (b,c,d)
The project site is characterized by variable topography and soil conditions. Elevations
within the site range from 700 to 1270 feet above mean sea level. Implementation of the
proposed project would require cut and fill operations and remedial grading techniques.
Landforms on the project site would be altered or modified.
The EIR for the project will evaluate impacts associated with proposed grading concepts
and standards, potential cut and fill requirements and cumulative landform impacts.
1. Earth (e,f)
The proposed project would require an extensive amount of grading. Erosion and
sedimentation impacts associated with grading and construction operations could affect
onsite and downstream drainage courses.
The EIR for the project will evaluate erosion and sedimentation impacts. Mitigation
measures will be proposed to mitigate potential erosion and sedimentation impacts.
2. AIR (a)
The proposed project will result in an incremental increase of emissions from motor
vehicles and stationary sources resulting in some long term air quality degradation.
Additionally, people located in the project vicinity could be subjected to short-term
increases of air pollution from dust and vehicles during construction operations.
The E1R for the project will evaluate future air quality conditions and the proposed
project's addition to short -and long term mobile and stationary source emissions. The air
quality evaluation will comply withh guidelines set forth by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District and the California Air Resources Board.
gf m:3881100 1
2. AIR (b,c)
There are no project components that would result in the creation of objectionable odors
or in the alteration •of air movement, temperature or climate. However, the proposed
project could be impacted by odors from the BKK Landfill.
The EIR will evaluate potential odor impacts from the BKK Landfill on future residents
of the project.
3. WATER (a,c,d,e,f,g)
Implementation of the proposed project would result in the construction of .impervious
surfaces such as roadways, sidewalks and buildings. Increased surface water runoff,
erosion and siltation resulting from the project could affect local drainage courses.
Additionally, the introduction of fertilizers and pesticides associated with the proposed
golf course could degrade surface water quality in the project area.
The U.S. Geological Survey Maps for the project area (Baldwin Park and San Dimas
Quadrangles) identify several natural drainage courses (blueline streams) within the
project site. Grading activities associated with the project could alter onsite drainage
courses.
Local groundwater in the project area could be affected by fertilizer and pesticide use on
the golf course and by runoff from impervious surfaces.
Implementation of the proposed -project would substantially increase the water demand
for the project area.
The EIR for the project will address the alteration of onsite drainage courses, onsite and
downstream drainage patterns, erosion and siltation, surface water runoff, and water
quality and water demand impacts.
3. WATER (b,h)
The project site is not located within a flood plain. Implementation of the project would
not result in flood hazards to residents or involve the alteration of potential flood
waters.
4. PLANT LIFE (a,b,c,d)
Implementation of the proposed project would impact onsite plant communities.
Additionally, the project would result in the introduction of new plant species into the
project area.
The EIR for the project will provide an inventory of onsite plant species and biological
habitats, and will evaluate potential impacts to biological resources_
5. ANIMAL LIFE (a,b,c,d)
Implementation of the proposed project would impact onsite animal life habitats and
would introduce domesticated animal species (e.g., dogs., cats) into the project area.
The EIR for the project will provide an inventory of onsite animal species arid will
evaluate potential animal Life impacts.
3
gfm.338P001
6. NOISE (a,b)
The proposed project will result in an increase of existing and future noise levels from
automobile traffic. Construction operations associated with the project could expose
people to short-term increases in noise levels in the project vicinity.
The EIR for the project will contain an acoustical analysis which will identify projected
roadway noise levels and the resultant impacts on existing and proposed land uses.
Additionally, the analysis will evaluate construction related noise impacts on sensitive
land uses such as open space and adjacent residential areas.
7. LIGHT and GLARE
The proposed project would introduce new sources of light and glare into the project site
vicinity.
The EIR for the project will address and evaluate light and glare impacts on existing and
proposed land uses.
S. LAND USE
The proposed project is inconsistent with the city's general plan and zoning code.
Approval of amendments to the general pian and zoning; code will be required to achieve
consistency.
The project site is currently involved with cattle ranching. Implementation of the
proposed project would displace these existing uses. The EIR for the project will
evaluate potential effects to onsite (including ranching) and surrounding land uses.
Additionally, the EIR will address the consistency of the project with relevant plans and
programs of the Cities of Walnut and West Covina, the County of Los Angeles, and
appropriate state agencies
9. NATURAL RESOURCES
Implementation of the proposed project would not result in a significant increase of
natural resource consumption. No significant natural resource impacts are anticipated.
10. RISK OF UPSET (a,b)
The proposed project does not involve the risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous
materials. Therefore, no risk of upset impacts are anticipated.
11. POPULATION
The proposed project would significantly increase the existing population in the project
area.
The EIR for the project will evaluate the potential population impacts within the project
area and the city.
4
gf m:888P001
12_ HOUSING
The proposed project would increase the amount of available housing in the project area
and the city_
The EIR for the project will evaluate potential housing impacts within the project area
and the city.
f I3 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION (a,h,c,d,e)
The proposed project would result in an increase in traffic volumes and parking demands
within the project site and project site vicinity. These projected increases could
significantly affect existing and/or proposed transportation systems, including bikeways
and pedestrian paths.
The project would alter present patterns of circulation of people and goods in the vicinity
of the project site.
The EIR for the project will include a comprehensive traffic analysis. The analysis will
evaluate existing and projected traffic and circulation conditions in the project area,
forecast potential impacts on existing and proposed transportation systems, and assess
cumulative impacts on roadways in the project vicinity.
14. PUBLIC SERVICES (a,b,c,d,e)
Implementation of the proposed project would increase the existing demand for public
services. Such public services would include fire protection, police protection, schools,
parks, health and emergency services and library services.
The EIR for the project will evaluate existing and proposed public services which may be
affected by the project. The public service demands for the project will be estimated and
appropriate agencies will be contacted regarding their ability to provide the required
services.
15. ENERGY (a,b)
Implementation of the proposed project would result in additional energy demands.
However, the proposed project does not propose land uses that would require unusual
amounts of fuel or other energy resources.
The EIR for the project will evaluate potential energy demands and possible energy
conservation methods.
16. UTILITIES (a,b,c,d,e,f)
Implementation of the proposed project would increase the existing demand for utilities.
Such utilities would include natural gas, electricity, telephone service, water, sewer,
flood control, solid waste disposal, and maintenance of public and community services
facilities_
The EIR for the project will
affected by the project_ The
appropriate agencies will be
services_
gfm:888Poo t
evaluate existing and proposed utilities which may be
utitity demands for the project will be estimated and
contacted regarding the adequacy of providing required
5
17. HUMAN LIEALTH (a,b)
The proposed project itself would not result in any health hazards. However, the proposed
project site is located adjacent to the BKK Landfill. An evaluation should be prepared
which addresses potential effects of the landfill and associated closure and post -closure
activities on proposed land uses.
The EIR for the project will address potential health impacts associated with the BKK
Landfill. Such issues will include chemical data and groundwater flow, air emissions,
closure activities, treatment systems, adequacy of treatment systems to prevent off-site
migration, results of similar off-site migration testing programs, recordkeeping,
meteorological evaluations, landfill operations and potential odor impacts.
18. AESTHETICS
The project site is located within an undeveloped open space area. Implementation of the
proposed project would alter the visual character of the project site. Open space views of
the site will be transformed into views of a suburban landscape.
The EIR for the project will address aesthetic impacts to the project site and project site
vicinity. Additionally, an analysis of viewshed encroachment into existing open space
corridors will be prepared.
19_ RECREATION
Implementation of the proposed project would create the need for additional recreational
facilities in the city. The proposed project would be subject to the city's local park
ordinance.
20. ARC HAEOLOGICAL%HISTORICAL
Grading impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project could affect
recorded and/or unknown archaeological or historical resources.
The EIR for the project will include a cultural resources report which will address
significant onsite archaeological and historical resources.
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (a,b,c,d)
Implementation of the proposed project would alter existing plant life and animal wildlife
habitats, displace existing open space and ranching uses, and result in short-term
construction related air quality and noise impacts to the environment. Additionally, the
project could have potential long term effects on the environment, in that existing land
uses would be displaced, long-term air quality could be degraded, long term noise levels
could increase and long term traffic volumes would increase. The potential impacts
identified for the proposed project could be individually and cumulatively significant.
However, the proposed project does not pose substantial. adverse effects on human beings
either directly or indirectly_
6
gfm=8881)001
�rhill
SAN Cn mks G
FERNANDO Ge
LA CANADA
P BURBANK FLINTRIDGE
VAN
NUYS
Vcn'u'a GLENDALE
Fwy
c
PASADENA ARCADIA Fool hilt
yoi� tc F" -v
HOLLYWOOD ooa SAN tiABRIEL
COVINA
s BEVERLY mob►- Szn Fwy
HILLS C
oma Fr WEST 0, j
COVINA . WALNUT 'e
cCIn R ANCE�Es e't� 1PROJECT SITE F�
o, L ; se
#*SAN
BELL WHITTIER BERNARDIN
1NGLEWOOD COUNTY
fiIM ANGELES COUNTY
=DEL\ REY DOWNE "' us
LYNWOOD 0 ORANGE
HAWTHORNE ci �� -� aREA COQ
►.tAKtiATTAN 4 �- L LINDA
�1-4S
=BEAU i-1-A-OYiERAries O
d' FULLERTON PLACENTIA
� CARSOK
REDONDO., LAKEWOOD
BEACH] TORRAKCE ANAHEIM
taw
0
Regional Location - 1 •
Walnut General Pian Amendment 10-89VN
-
andZone Change 30-39 a W-
+ a MILES
Exhibit l
'-E:�"•=�' - ` .; - J Z • _ _ - � � � — t : _ � — ,`�_�r��l - �--� � f,Tc��''\s-mak-' -. i) : ` ✓yr ;,�� . � .�
- -ter � - '` t t ul�.--- � � ._.. �- ` - � 1 : 1 � - .• - �• _
O . l--...�r J' • " M c ' '- _ _ . rte' �•- 1
_ r :..-..• _,� - -- — i=— --- - - ` � "`"L 4 ` - -- _ - .tip._ _J
ot
In
• _�;__--�-:�z��-- — �,:: �� •� _ - _-.�`,'�� - -- Lam_-' _
. ------
�« f asp fy--s`_"„ •r L � _ .�'.�-•-_'----'`�������`] ���`��� � a _ ^�� ✓ �� -., _
�s �£ �i�., n '� S.r+�ai.. r';,ti :�. . � \ �a •r =r i 1. /� 'L i �., \' -� T� �����-- .. - t _ �'�.
PROJECT
7-1
! ,-�_!i .- �-„� --, -� � � - —,• � _ ,. J�,. - \•fit � � .- �'\.o i ✓- i _ = - - � � ,.
/r•.'l)��_ `rte ti ( �. Z 'x- �'V G
t •J� ���� r M
J.1
Vicinity Map
Walnut General Pian
and Zone Change
0 Els 2750 FEE]'
Exhibit 2
h - ,
N D >
m r- r-
t
pm
m
N
U
2m Z Z
(n
-i A
mr- i= m
ORDINANCE NO. 16 - (1989)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PERTAINING TO ANIMAL CONTROL FEES.
A. Recitals.
(i) Pursuant to the provisions of California law, this
City Council has heretofore adopted the entirety of the Los
Angeles County Code as the Municipal Code of the City of Diamond
Bar, including the provisions of Title 10 thereof pertaining to
animals and animal control.
(ii) This City Council has determined to provide
animal control services through the Pomona Valley Humane Society.
(iii) This City Council desires to establish
procedures for the setting of fees for various animal control
services, including licensing.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. In all respects, as set forth in Part A, of
this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of
Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Codes, as heretofore adopted
by this City Council, fees for animal control services and
modifications thereto shall be set by resolution of this City
Council.
1
SECTION 3. The Deputy Cite Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted
in three (3) public places within the City of Diamond Bar
pursuant to the provisions of Resolution 89-6.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of
1989.
Mayor
I, TOMMYE A. NICE, Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was
introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 1989,
and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of ,
1989, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
L\1011\0RDANLFS\DS 13.2 2
Tommye A. Nice
Deputy City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
r
fL
ORDINANCE NO. (1989)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR PROHIBITING THE SALE, USE OR
DISCHARGE OF ANY FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR.
A. Recitals.
(i) Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 11 of the
California Health and Safety Code (Sections 12500, et seq.)
authorizes the regulation of the sale:, use or discharge of
fireworks within the City of Diamond Bar.
(ii) This City Council desires to implement the
provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 12541
authorizing the prohibition of sale, use or discharge of
fireworks within the City for the health and safety of the
residents of the community.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond
Bar does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2: Notwithstanding any other provisions of the
Los Angeles County Code, as heretofore adopted by this City
Council, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership
or corporation to sell, use or discharge any fireworks within the
City of Diamond Bar including, but not limited to, "safe and
1
sane" fireworks as that term is defined in Part 2 of Division 11
of the California Health and Safety Code, as the same may be
amended from time to time hereafter.
SECTION 3: Penalty for violation of ordinance.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership,
or corporation to violate any provision, or to fail to comply
with any of the requirements, of this Ordinance. Any person,
firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this
Ordinance, or failing to comply with any of its requirements,
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand
Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6)
months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person,
firm, partnership or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof
during which any violation of this Ordinance is committed,
continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or
corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided
in this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: Civil Remedies Available.
The violation of any of the provisions of this
Ordinance shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the
CITY through civil process by means of restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner
provided by law for the abatement of :nuisances.
2
Olt
I, TOMMYE NICE, Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was
introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Diamond bar held on the day of June, 1989, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
L\1001�0FIRWKS1kM 1.3B 4
ATTEST:
Tommye Nice, Deputy City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
i
I N T E R O F F I C E 11 E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 7, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert L. Van Nort, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Award of Engineering Contract for
Construction Management for Carlton J. Peterson
BACKGROUND
The City Council, at its June meeting, directed staff to contact
the engineering firm of Ron Kranzer and Associates to perform
professional engineering for the construction management of the
proposed Carlton J. Peterson Park. In reviewing the proposal
using the 7-10% rule of thumb for estimating management costs,
the proposal appears to be within the limits established by the
industry.
RECOMMENDATION
In view of the constraints and the direction of the community
that the park be constructed this :summer, it is requested that
the City Council award the contract to Ron Kranzer and Associates
in an amount TO EXCEED $30,343, per the attached proposal.
t
ROBERT L. VAN NORT
City Manager
RLVN:tn
T0t1960t13Le44 and associates, civil engineers, inc.
398 S. Lemon Creek Drive, Suite E - Walnut, California 91789 - (714) 594-9702 (818) 331-8323
FAX (714) 594-2658
July 3, 1989
Robert Van Nort, City Manager
City of Diamond Bar
Post Office Box 4900
Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765
Dear Mr. Van Nort:
We at Ron Kranzer and Associates are pleased to submit for your
review our proposal for providing professional engineering
services for Contract and Construction Administration for the
proposed Carlton J. Peterson Park.
our proposed services include all construction engineering,
administration and project management. A more detailed breakdown
is presented in the following summary outline:
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING:
1—Formal Bid Process 10 hrs. @ $73.00
2. Preconstruction Conf. 6 hrs. @ $73.00
3. Construction Inspect..328 hrs. @ $50.00
4. Project Management 125 hrs. @ $73.00
5. Project Meetings 50 hrs. @ $73.00
Construction Total
$ 730.00
$ 438.00
$ 16400.00
$ 9125.00
$ 3650.00
$ 30,343.00
RKA proposes to provide the above described services on a Time
and Materials basis "Not to Exceed" the amount quoted.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please open a purchase
order to us and forward a copy to our office. We have left out
any contingency amount since we feel confident that the amount
quoted will be sufficient to cover all work proposed.
It has been a pleasure to present this proposal and we look
forward to working for the City on this project. If you should
have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance,
please call me at (714) 594-9702.
Very truly yours,'
F
Robert P. Morgenstern, Director of Municipal services
C�
REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN FOLLOWING ADOPTION
OF ORDINANCE NO. 1.1 (1989)
Pursuant to the requirements of California Government
Code Section 65858(d), and at the express direction of the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar, the following constitutes a
written report of the City Council concerning those measures
taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of
Ordinance No. 11 (1989).
BACKGROUND
1. On June 6, 1989, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 11 (1989) entitled "An
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
Adopting an Interim Zoning ordinance Pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65858(b) and Making Findings in Support
Thereof." Said Ordinance No. 11 (1989) adopted interim zoning
regulations, effective for no longer than forty-five (45) days,
requiring that all applications for development within the R-3
(Limited Multiple Residence) and R-4 (Unlimited Residence) Zones
within the City are to be processed in accordance with the
procedures specified in Part 1 of Chapter 22.56 of Title 22 of
the Los Angeles County Code as heretofore adopted by the City.
Pursuant to the requirements of said Section 65858, Ordinance No.
11 (1989) was adopted by the City Council upon its finding that
approvals of such development applications within the City, other
1
than pursuant to the interim policies, would result in an
immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare.
2. Pursuant to California Government Code Section
65858(b), ten (10) days prior to the expiration of any interim
ordinance, or any extension thereof adopted pursuant to the terms
of said section, the City Council shall issue a written report
describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which
led to the adoption of such interim zoning ordinance.
3. On June 27, 1989, at an adjourned meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, the City Council was
presented with an oral staff report concerning the measures taken
to alleviate the conditions which prompted the adoption of said
Ordinance No. 11 (1989). At said meeting and following said
staff report, the City Council authorized and directed staff to
prepare a written report concerning the actions taken following
and relative to, the adoption of Ordinance No. 11 (1989).
ACTIONS TAKEN
Following the adoption of Ordinance No. 11 (1989), the
following actions have been taken relative to the interim zoning
regulations:
1. At the express request and direction of the City
Council, the City Staff has been continuing in its efforts to
formulate the General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar and
specific amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance. The goal of
such General Plan study and Zoning Ordinance amendments is to
2
create a unified and balanced plan of development for the City of
Diamond Bar which will eventually result in the establishment of
permanent and comprehensive zoning policies for the City.
2. The City Council directed that such General Plan
study emphasize the formulation of the Land Use Element thereof.
The preparation of such Land Use Element will provide the
necessary guideline for long-term development in the City.
Moreover, the contemplated amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
will permit the comprehensive review, together with public input,
of development proposals in the above• -specified zones. With the
adoption of a Land Use Element and the amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance, the City Council would consider the earlier repeal of
Ordinance No. 11 (1989).
Dated: July 5, 1989.
i
Robert L. VanNort, City Manager
LN1011i11EXIMWB 6.6 3
•
r 20
REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN FOLLOWING ADOPTION
OF ORDINANCE NO. 9.5 (1989)
Pursuant to the requirements of California Government
Code Section 65858(d), and at the express direction of the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar, the following constitutes a
written report of the City Council concerning those measures
taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of
Ordinance No. 15 (1989).
BACKGROUND
1. On June 20, 1989, the City Council of the City of
Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 15 (1989) entitled "An
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar,
Adopting an Interim Zoning Ordinance Pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65858(b) and Making Findings in Support
Thereof." Said Ordinance No. 15 (1989) adopted interim zoning
regulations, effective for no longer than forty-five (45) days,
requiring that all applications for development within the C -H
(Commercial Highway), C-1 (Restricted Business), C-2
(Neighborhood Business), C-3 (Unlimited Commercial), C-R
(Commercial Recreation), CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and
M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Zones within the City are to be
processed in accordance with the procedures specified in Part 1
of Chapter 22.56 of Title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code as
heretofore adopted by the City. Pursuant to the requirements of
said Section 65858, Ordinance No. 15 (1989) was adopted by the
1 � '
City Council upon its finding that approvals of such development
applications within the City, other than pursuant to the interim
policies, would result in an immediate threat to public health,
safety or welfare.
2. Pursuant to California government Code Section
65858(b), ten (10) days prior to the expiration of any interim
ordinance, or any extension thereof adopted pursuant to the terms
of said section, the City Council shall issue a written report
describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which
led to the adoption of such interim zoning ordinance.
3. On June 27, 1989, at an adjourned meeting of the
City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, the City Council was
presented with an oral staff report concerning the measures taken
to alleviate the conditions which prompted the adoption of said
Ordinance No. 15 (1989). At said meeting and following said
staff report, the City Council authorized and directed staff to
prepare a written report concerning the actions taken following
and relative to, the adoption of Ordinance No. 15 (1989).
ACTIONS TAKEN
Following the adoption of Ordinance No. 15 (1989), the
following actions have been taken relative to the interim zoning
regulations:
1. At the express request and direction of the City
Council, the City Staff has been continuing in its efforts to
formulate the General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar and
2
specific amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance. The goal of
such General Plan study and Zoning Ordinance amendments is to
create a unified and balanced plan of development for the City of
Diamond Bar which will eventually result in the establishment of
permanent and comprehensive zoning policies for the City.
2. The City Council directed that such General Plan
study emphasize the formulation of the Land Use Element thereof.
The preparation of such Land Use Element will provide the
necessary guideline for long-term development in the City.
Moreover, the contemplated amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
will permit the comprehensive review, together with public input,
of development proposals in the above -•specified zones. With the
adoption of a Land Use Element and the: amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance, the City Council would consider the earlier repeal of
Ordinance No. 15 (1989).
Dated: July 5, 1989.
Robert L. a Nort, City Manager
Lk1011X15EXTEN\DB 6.6 3
PHYLLIS PAPEN
Mayor
PAUL V. HORCHER
Mayor Pro Tem
GARY MILLER
GARY 'VERNIER
JOHN FORBING
Councilmembers
ROBERT L. VAN NORT
City Manager
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SU1TE 330
DIANIOND BAR, CA, 91765
7I4 -860 -CITY 714-860-2489
July 5, 1989
TO: John Gutwein
FROM: Robert L. Van Ncrt
City Manager
RE: Project #88-507
Parcel Map No. 20358
Background: The City Council will be reviewing its
first Tentative parcel Map at its July 11, 1989 session.
The developers (KOLL) met with this office and Councilman
Werner to describe the project and identify any unanswered
area of concern. The initial report was confusing and
failed to specifically address the traffic impacts of the
proposed development. The developer left a copy of their
traffic analysis, dated April 20, 1989 for our use. County
provided copy in April.
Reguest: It is requested that specific conditions be
included with him the Tentative Parcel (#20358) that
reflect the report or prior EIR. Please be prepared to
provide council and developer your conditions at the July
11, 1989 public hearing.
R bertNot
City Manager
RLVN:ch
cc: Council
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • PARKING
1580 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 122, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 • (714) 641.1587
April 20, 1989
Mr. Graham Tingler
Development Manager
THE KOLL COMPANY
818 W. Seventh Street, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER
PARCELS 6 and 7
Diamond Bar, California
Dear Mr. Tingler:
PHILIP M. LINSCOTT, P.E.
JACK M. GREENSPAN, P.E.
WILLIAM A. LAW, P.E.
PAUL W. WILKINSON, P.E.
LEON D. WARD, P.E.
DONALD W. BARKER, P.E.
As you requested, this letter presents our evaluation of the
potential traffic impacts associated with the development of
Parcels 6 and 7 in Diamond Bar Gateway Corporate Center.
Included with this letter report is the Traffic Study Report
we completed for Gateway Corporate Center in June 1988.
Our June, 1988 traffic -study for Gateway Corporate Center
was an update of a Kunzman 1981 study for a "business park"
development scenario, and essentially added the restaurant/
hotel uses to the previous project description and analyses.
Our study addressed a general development plan that included
36 acres of light industrial development, 36 acres of
general office, 2 acres planned for restaurants, and 2 acres
for a hotel. That June, 1988 study did not evaluate a
specific building scenario for each lot in the development.
The purpose of this letter analysis is to compare the
current development plan for Parcels 6 and 7 to the general
development plan, and evaluate the impacts of the net added
trips for Parcels 6 and 7 related to your specific
development plans which were not "budgeted" in prior
studies.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Five, two story office buildings, with a total of 87,800
gross square feet are proposed on Parcels 6 and 7. The two
adjoining parcels are bordered by Gateway Center Drive to
OTHER OFFICES • PASADENA (213) 681-2629 & SAN DIEGO (619) 299-3090
AN LG2WD COMPANY
Linscott, Law & Greenspan,, Engineers
Page Two
THE KOLL COMPANY
April 20, 1988
the north, and Bridge Gate and Valley Vista Drive to the
east and west, respectively. The site plan, prepared by
Mosakowski Lindsey Associates is presented in Exhibit 1 (all
exhibits and tables are attached at the end of this letter).
The vicinity map and general site plan for Gateway Corporate
Center are presented in the prior traffic study, together
with traffic related inventories of existing conditions in
the study area.
TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST
The proposed 87,800 square feet of office space is expected
to generate approximately 1,240 daily trips (half arriving
and half departing), with 180 trips anticipated during the
AM peak hour (155 inbound, 25 outbound) and 175 trips (25
inbound, 150 outbound) during the PM peak hour. Table 1
identifies the trip generation rates used in this analysis,
and presents a specific traffic forecast for the development
of these parcels as now proposed together with the implied
"trip budget" of the prior studies for these specific sites.
The trip generation rates shown in' Table 1 are derived from
the trip generation equations in Table 2 that are published
in "Trip Generation", the Fourth Edition by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers.
Parcels 6 and 7 have a total usable land area of 4.46 acres.
These two lots have an implied "trip budget" from the prior
study of approximately six percent: (4.46 _ 73 = 0.06) of all
the traffic expected for the office/industrial uses (73
acres) at Gateway Corporate Center. The additional traffic
increment related to the proposed project that has not been
reflected in the prior analysis, :is shown in the bottom row
of Table 1. The project is expected to generate about 600
additional daily trips and 100 traps during both the AM and
PM peak hours that have not been accounted for in the
previous traffic study.
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
The same distribution pattern used in the June 1988 Traffic
Study for Gateway Corporate Center was used to distribute
and assign the additional traffic from Parcels 6 and 7.
Exhibit 2 presents distribution and assignment of the
additional peak hour traffic increment associated with
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Page Three
THE KOLL COMPANY
April 20, 1988
Parcels 6 and 7. As shown in Exhibit 2, the additional
traffic increment for the project as now proposed, is
relatively small, with the largest increase at the Gateway
Center Drive project entry with the largest traffic volume
increase being 55 vehicles in the PM peak hour.
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
The impact of the proposed project increment hab been
evaluated by including the additional project -related
traffic from Parcels 6 and 7 in updated Intersection
Capacity Utilization (ICU) analyses at five key
intersections on Golden Springs Drive. A description of the
ICU analysis and the detailed calculations for each
intersection are included following the Exhibits and Tables.
The ICU analyses in the June 1988 Traffic study have been
updated and modified slightly to include the street
improvement recommendations by the County of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works in there letter dated July 21,
1988. Also a count tabulation error has been corrected in
the existing PM peak hour traffic volume at Brea
Canyon/Golden Springs; where the northbound right turn
volume was interpreted as 11771" instead of 11441" in the
handwritten field count sheets input to the prior study.
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the AM and PM level of service
analyses, respectively. The actual computer print-outs are
at the back of the attachments to this letter. The decimal
values in both tables can be thought of as volume -to -
capacity ratios for the indicated volume condition, where an
acceptable ratio is generally defined as 0.90 or less.
A comparison of the 2 right columns within each table
isolates the relative change in ICU value specifically
related to the Parcels 6 and 7 incremental traffic additions
to the "traffic budgets" for the project implied in the
prior study.
As shown in Table 4, an adverse level of service is expected
on Golden Springs during the PM peak hour at Gateway Center,
Copley Drive, and Grand Avenue, irrespective of the
development descriptions for Parcels 6 and 7. The additive
traffic increment from Parcels 6 and 7 as now defined, is
not expected to change the level of service at any
intersection during either the AM or PM peak hour. The
increase in the ICU value as a result of- the project
Linscott, Law & Greenspan., Engineers
Page Four
THE KOLL COMPANY
April 20, 1988
increment varies from no change to 0.05 during the AM peak
hour when an acceptable service level is anticipated at each
intersection. The PM peak hour increment due to the Parcel 6
and 7 development plan ranges from no change to 0.03, with
the increases occurring at the two project entries as well
as Golden Springs/Brea Canyon.
FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS
The proposed development plan for Parcels 6 and 7 will
result in an incremental increase in trips related to these
parcels over implied "trip budgets" reflected in prior
studies. While the trip increments are small, they do
result in a small change at three adverse intersections in
the PM peak hour. These intersections are expected to be
adverse independent of any trip increase related to Parcels
6 and 7, in spite of County anticipated street improvements.
Those adversities are related to cumulative area development
as well as regional "bypass" traffic on Golden Springs which
uses the route as an alternative to the freeway system.
County staff is aware of these future adverse levels of
service which were "uncovered" in the Hotel C.U.P. traffic
study done in June, 1988, by LLG, and appears to be raising
this and subsequent studies as a basis to negotiate "fair
share" funding of their list of improvements. As you know,
LLG is in the process of updating the study to reflect the
expected total development aspirations for Gateway Corpora-
tion Center (which exceed the "trip budgets" of prior
traffic studies but are within the original design guide-
lines for the project). It is the hope of the development
team that this master study will put these traffic issues to
bed once and for all, but we really won't know the outcome
until it happens.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis and
are prepared to provide additional support as needed. Please
contact me or Paul Wilkinson if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
a L. Nelson
Transportation Engineer II
r
os m
CD O
z
Cf) O
J a
w o
U
cc a
Q w
z
z w
U
Q
J Ew..
d Q
cc
a
2
Cl) o
U
Q
w
Q
O
A
C
C
W
C
fu
a
N
C
d
06
J
O
u
N
A1- J
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
0CN
0
0
P
o
H '3
+y' f
•d'
A N
.1
. -1
r'►
opo
0) � �
�
O
O
N
E-+
i4 Z N4-)
o
s~
04 U N
N
O
U)
�
tnl
h
O
O
x
N
X W O
_,q qj W i 4
r1
W0
H
H
N
N 0 PA
a4
z
rI
(d
a
M
H
0
cd
0
9 14
0)
o
U @
H
H
+3
43
>, N
Ot` m
rd
U
-0>�C7
w�v
P4
'Lt
> �.� fa
4-)w
�1
.� o a 43
in
cd
o
H is
41
N
ro-Z o++
N
a%a O
�ato
C-0
1~
rh
E�
O
H
0
N H
woo
O
�WH �4
N
O
rO-I
U
n IQ O
N R1 W
V a Id
r�i
o
41
W
0
W C�1
O
MH O W
Pf 4J
a4 0
N
>
1°>v(d
H
W
�
w
to
o
mP(do
r,�
�i
H
Ui
�a�PU
-r-4
(d
0 S4
4-01
4+-1
Wr,
0 •x 4.3- CH
in
1
°°
-T
4J
4-)
i N
i
U
G H
4J
O
N
�
Q
0
0
W
(d
0
N
0CN
0
0
P
o
�.
. -1
opo
0) � �
(n
U 'd 4-) ----
rA
i4 Z N4-)
N -r•4 0
04 U N
N
•-+
I rqr
U)
�
tnl
h
O
O
�4
O
N
X W O
_,q qj W i 4
r1
1
H
N
N 0 PA
rI
(d
�U�b
W
CO 0
�W0)
cd
P
O.-1
0
0)
o
>w
N 04
H
+3
43
>, N
rd
U
-0>�C7
P4
'Lt
> �.� fa
4-)w
�1
0
in
cd
P
'
N
ro-Z o++
1~
E�
O
N H
O
�WH �4
0
rO-I
U
n IQ O
N R1 W
ol
o
0) E-4
4.1
MH O W
N
>
1°>v(d
W
H It $4 4J
to
mP(do
r,�
'I
�a�PU
-r-4
(d
0 S4
Wr,
0 •x 4.3- CH
in
1
°°
-T
4J
4-)
i N
i
a
0V
O
4.1
O U U
0
W
(d
N
U�4-) O
'i O
P
M 04
W O
O _
r-1
W
U0
(9
P
O
M U
P11 4-3
-4W
R+
po
-14
(d 4-4
Ho
N
or N
� CO
444
r-4 P
..
to
ani
•ri + � 41
td
u
E4
O I-
:J.4
'L
O
5
N SY !N
41
3.4
00
O
,> -T P O
try
9
w
•O
co
Aa
DESCRIPTION
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER
Diamond Bar, California
EQUATIONI % INBOUND o OUTBOUND
GENERAL OFFICE
A M Peak LN(T) = 0.86LN(X) + 1.342 87 _13
P M Peak LN(T) = 0.83LN(X) + 1.46 16 84
Daily 2 -Way LN(T) = 0.75LN(X) + 3.77 50 50
1 Source: Trip Generation, 4th Edition, Institute of
Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., 1987
2 T represents total trips and X represents gross square
footage in 1000's.
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
TABLE 3
AM PEAR HOUR;
LEVEL OF SERVICE.SUMMARY
(ICU/LOS)1
Gateway Corporate Center
Intersection Capacity utilization/Level of Service, see the Appendix for an
explanation of the ICU/LOS concept and detailed calculations.
2 Mitigation not recommended and/or required.
PLUS
PLUS
WITH
APPROVED
PLUS
ADDITIVE
EXISTING
AMBIENT
COUNTY
GCC
CUMULATIVE
PARCEL 6 & 7
LOCATION
CONDITIONS
GROWTH
MITIGATION
TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC
Golden Springs/
Brea Canyon Rd.
0.63/6
0.73/C
0.73/C
0.74/C
0.75/C
0.75/C
Golden Springs/
Gateway Center
0.30/A
0.34/A
0.34/A
0.70/6
0.70/8
0.75/C
Golden Springs/
Copley Drive
0.30/A
0.34/A
NR 2
0.46/A
0.52/A
0.53/A
Golden Springs/
Grand Avenue
0.55/A
0.63/8
0.48/A
0.69/8
0.81/D
0.83/D
Golden Springs/
Diamond Bar
0.55/A
0.63/6
0.571A
0.58/A
0.59/A
0.59/A
Intersection Capacity utilization/Level of Service, see the Appendix for an
explanation of the ICU/LOS concept and detailed calculations.
2 Mitigation not recommended and/or required.
Linscott, Law & Greenspan„ Engineers
TABLE 4
PM PEAK HOUR
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY
(ICU/LOS)1
Gateway Corporate Center
PLUS
PLUS
WITH
APPROVED
PLUS
ADDITIVE
EXISTING
AMBIENT
COUNTY
GCC CUMULATIVE
PARCEL 6 & 7
LOCATION
CONDITIONS
GROWTH
MITIGATION
TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC
Golden Springs/
Brea Canyon Rd.
0.90/0
1.07/F
0.78/C
0.911E
0.941E
0.96/E
Golden Springs/
Gateway Center
0.64/B
0.75/C
0.75/C
1.02/F
1.06/F
1.09/F
Golden Springs/
Copley Drive
0.64/6
0.75/C
NR
0.98/E
1.02/F
1.04/F
Golden Springs/
Grand Avenue
0.91/E
1.08/F
0.86/D
0.88/D
1.09/F
1.09/F
Golden Springs/
Diamond Bar
0.89/D
1.Q5/F
0.87/D
0.87/D
0.88/D
0.88/D
1 Intersection Capacity Utilization/Level
of Service, see
the Appendix
for an
explanation of
the ICU/LOS
concept and
detailed calculations.
2 Mitigation not
recommended
and/or required.
APPENDIX A
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) AND INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU)
Level of Service is a term used to describe prevailing conditions and their effect on
traffic. Broadly interpreted, the Level of Service concept denotes any one of a number of
various traffic volumes. Level of Service is a qualitative measure of the effect of such
factors as travelspeed, travel time, interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving
comfort and convenience.
Six Levels of Service, A through F, have been defined in the Highway Capacity Manual of
1985. Level of Service A describes a condition of free flow, with low traffic volumes and
relatively high speeds, while Level of Service F describes forced traffic flow at low speeds
with jammed conditions and queues which cannot clear during the green phases.
The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of intersection capacity analysis has
been used in our studies. It directly relates traffic demand and available capacity for key
intersection movements, regardless of present signal timing. The capacity per hour of green
time for each approach is caLcutated based on the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual. The
proportion of total signal time needed by each key movement is determined and compared to the
total time available (100 percent of the hour). The result of summing the requirements of the
conflicting key movements plus an allowance for clearance times is expressed as a decimal
fraction. Conflicting key traffic movements are those opposing movements whose combined green
time requirements are greatest.
The resulting ICU represents the proportion of the total hour required to accommodate
intersection demand volumes if the key conflicting traffic movements are operating at capacity.
Other movements may be operating near capacity, or may be opperating at significantly better
levels. The ICU may be translated to a Level of Service as .tabulated below.
The Levels of Service (abbreviated from the Highway Capacity Manual) are listed here with
their corresponding ICU and Load Factor equivalents. (Load Factor is that proportion of the
signal cycles during thePeak hour which are fully loaded; i.e., when all of the vehicles
waiting at the beginning of green are not able to clear on that green phase.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LOAD
FACTOR
EQUIVALENT
A (free flow)
0.0
0.0
- 0.60
B (rural design)
0.0
- 0.1
0.61
- 0.70
C (urban design)
0.1
- 0.3
0.71
- 0.80
D (maximum urban design)
0.3
- 0.7
0.81
- 0.90
E (capacity)
0.7
- 1.Q
0.91
- 1.00
F (forced flow)
Not
Applicable
Not
Applicable
SERVICE LEVEL A
There are no loaded cycles and few are even close to loaded at this service level. No
approach phase is fuLLy utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red
indication.
SERVICE LEVEL B
This level represents stable operation where an occasional approach phase is fully
utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel
restricted within platoons of vehicles.
SERVICE LEVEL C
At this level stable operation continues. Loading is still intermittent but more frequent
that at Level B. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal
indication and backups may develop behind have
vehicles. Most drivers feet somewhat
restricted, but no objectionably so.
SERVICE LEVEL D
This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the
intersection. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the
peak hour, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of queues,
thus preventing excessive backups. Drivers frequently have to wait through more than one red
signal. This level is the Lower limit of acceptable operation to most drivers.
SERVICE LEVEL E
This represents near capacity and capacity operation. At capacity (ICU = 1.0) it
represents the most vehicles that the particular intersection can accommodate. However, full
utilization of every signal cycle is seldom attained no matter how great the demand. At this
level all drivers wait through more than one red signal, and frequently through several.
SERVICE LEVEL F
Jammed conditions. Traffic backed up from a downstream location on one of the streets
restricts or prevents movement of traffic through the intersection under consideration.
4
1
'
1
O 1
++F
s
py
Cl- N
M m
.t ti O
O-0 Y'
O it
u']
1 U
\ H 1
---1 O --1
ti .-1 M
.ti N G
n .1 M
•-1 II
h
1
> Q 1
OC i
G G O
O O O
E d d
O O O
O 11
O
i IV
I
1
U
H
1
O G O
O O O
O O O
O O O
�.
a_ 1
0 0 0
m 0 0
m O
O O G
CC
Q 1
N .0
m N .O
m m
-0 N -O
W
m
W
W
J 1
h h P
N .-1C3
P .-i O
M <- —0'
st• m .-a
.r Irs •r -i
m
>
J
¢
W
C3
H} 1
W
J
m
�-
W
1
1
G G G
O O O
G O O
O Ill al']
U
ti
J
O J 1
Q O I
M
1
1rt
t•
iT
P O
M M m
O 11
v7
1 U
> 4 1
N
CC 1
1
O O d
O O O
O O d
0 0 0
O it
O
i W
U
1
O O W
O O O
O O O
O O O
>
d 1
O O W
N fX
W O O
m N -O
m 6
m m
O O O
m
N
f1I
1
W
W
W I
J S I
Y] m e
h h m
O O P
m .-�
M N +-•t
N st .-•
Z
J
O
J 1
'~ N .-1
M � .L]
< m .-1
.-1 tf'1 t>•?
Q
y
1Q•-
fl 0 1
W
O
w
>
1
J
U
U
W
J
C] O
O O
O O af')
-
¢ >
U 1
M m
�' m 0
P U7 m
O N
'O'
1 U
\ 1--- 1
.-a O O
ti .-i M
� ti O
O .--i N
.'•i 11
f`r
i
S 1
1
0 0 0
0 0 0
G O O
O O O
O 11
O
1 W
U
1
O O W
O O 6
G O O
O G O
?
CL- 1
Q 1
O O W
—0 N Ir
m O O
m �O
m
m
m m
0 —0 N 0 0OI
S
W
w
W>
M
CC
rl M .-1
w
w
on
1
O O Cl.
M N +
N .c!• —0
Z
J
O
N .-1
M C• —0
V- ,n .-+
.-1 V• b•
>
I=) J 1
O O 1
¢
W
O
W
}
1
V
W
J
1
A J i
O G G
at-
u'a O O
O
C U'a O
m
If7i O If3
N sl- P
P
U 1
.-• P d
•s M m
Q- m a
h v N
O 11
M
I U
N
CC t
1
1
O O d
_ _
O.O O
G O O
G O O
O It
O
1 I"
U
W
O O O
O O O
O 6 O
>
2 1O
O W
m G O
m O
O O O
a
Q 1'-0
U ;
N m
.-1 M ti
m N-0
N M
m m
fV
M
GWty
1
W
W
W 1
.t] m to
sr•, G P
M h -+
h .-y
2
J
O
O O 1
W
O
}
1--- �• i
J
U
W
D J 7
4 O O
G G O
G G O
O O d
C O i
Q y /
O I
m
Rt N O
h�e1' N
6 Ii
M
i U
H 1 1
> Q
ti O O
S 1
O O O
O O O
O O G
O O O
G It
O
1 W
1
1
U
1
6 O G
G O G
O O G
4 O O
y
a 1
6 O O
O O 6
m O
G G O
d^
CI]
1
1
W
W
W i
-0 m
u-rC�.
_
U
2
=
J
O
.h-1 C IPi
Q
Q
m
�.
J
d O 1
W
=
>
1
1
0 0 U's
O O tT
G M1l'3 O
O O
U
4 J 1
M K9
N h O
h M M
1—
N I� -0
Q } 1
O I
w
M
1.M
U H I
P h N
U"i +ti N
N G
.n N m
G tl
M
1
11
O G O
O If
O
1 11
i
W
1
G G O
O O G
G O 6
O 6 G
.0
r1 I
0 6 G
G O G
m O
O O O
y
Q I
U I
1
.n N ti
H M
.-0-• N --01
M
m N
N M
� N .-0a
M
w
W
1
W I
—0 m G
m
m 4 O
sr h .dam
P —0 P
Z
J
O m
O I
Q
W
]E !
04 [Ya IW
04 04.04
G] a1
Ia W m
O-
} I
m Lf) Vi
A."
W W W
3 2 Z
O
O f
�
S I
U
C3
i�
J
uJ
y v
! L
z
} �!
3
1-1
w CL
w c Cz
-_ IL
Q V 0
J
i
}
>
J LL
U h
a
1
1
1
S 1
1
O O O
G O O
O O O
0 0 0
0 11
O 1
W
U
1
lL 1
O O d
0 6 0
O O O
[D O O
O O O
m 0
O O O
0 0 0
>
L>=
1
V
IJ_
W 1
N ---1 M
'•!' O- N
IC"1 —0 m
W 1+'1 m
Z
J
d
O O ;
ti
J
U
W
1
1
O O G
IFY O O
O In G
d 11'7 O
V
r
J
C1 O I
Q >
1
d�4
art
♦.i
V.
O 1
U
N
--'1 ^I M
-
N M O
.-+ .-+ •�t'
--� II
- 11
[T 1
1
11
I
6 O
G 11
O 1
W
U
1
O O 4
4 O O
O G O
6 O O
9
CL 1
6 I
U 1
O O O
N-0
M
m O d
tb N-0
N M
m G
C8 m
N -7'
0 0 0
-C? N
M
L>=
CII
I
W
W
W i
J� t
N ti M
+t- N -.O
Cr- 0- N
1A tfi .ti
11'i W
-O
¢T O m
Z
P
¢= 1
N C NJ
Y'i •Y' -O
t[S ti N
N V' h
K
>
J
CD, o 1
H> 1
W
J
U
=
r
>
W
J
1
O O O
G O O
O Ifi O
{II O N"i
G J 1
N
+Y
m
h It7
0
O
M
ti
O II
G 1
W
i
> L1= t
.In-+ -M-1 C~i
O O O
. -f M
O O O
N C
O O O
-t M
G O O
It
O
O 1
01
W
,
V
I
G O O
G O G
O O O
CL I
a I
C-3 I
0 0 0
-nM
.-i M
m 0 0
N -0
N M r1
ISI O
M m
N V•
G O O
-p N .a
--1 M `-1
[X
W
m
1
1
W
W
u
W
=
u -
Q = 1-
v M
u'+ V• -b
-C] •,y- N
-0
O N -O
Q
Q
d? 1
J
U
W
W
1
0 0 0
tfY O 6
d O O
O 11'I O
U
J
r—
m
-{I Cr -
Q > f
L} 0 i
Y'S M m
th v co
O M O
-O an .-a
O 11
co
? Q 1
r+ M
N M O
P 6 ---1
11
It
r� 1
1
11
f`G 1
1
0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O O
O 11
O I
W
t -I
1
1
_ _
O Cl O
O O O
O O d
O O O
>
¢ 1
O O O
-O N -9
m 0 0
Co N -CI
m 0
m tm,
O O O
CK
U
CII
W 1
N M
-a m
M 1t'] M
Z
J
O
tl-
C lI] --1
—0-0 N
T K] 1—
INS
N —
O
I
J
U
U
W
1
O G G
O G O
O O O
G G O
A J 1
Q > 1
IwF
.i
•F
Iy1
Q 1
m
-G co -r
G II
r.-1
L,
O r-1
It
It
4 1
t
C.�
1
G O O
O 0 0
O G 6
O O O
>
K 1O
¢ 1
6 O
N-0
O O G
—0 N
m O
m N
O G G
-C) C-4 -C
CC
W
CJ. 1
1
M ---J
--1
W
W
1
U
=
LL
O
J E I
VN" N OM'-
�7 .N-1
-O -�9 N
C!M- U l rM
Q
Q
1
1
G II] O
II] O Y')
O I>7 O
11'I Lt'I O
U
J
G J 1
c� 0 1
Y h K?
h [3]
M
¢ > 1
o t
N N
t--. CI-
117.> G O
G II
.-1 11
O 1
a 1
O
} Q 111
GC 1
G O O
O 0 0
6 0 0
b 0 0
O 11
I
G 1
11
t
1
W
1
1
O O O
O O O
O 6 G
O G G
O G O
O
O O O
G O G
_u
>
<C
Q 1
-O N KI
+O N -Q
m m N
-t? N -CI
w
I
1
W
W
[P
W 1
CJ
m
co O M
U
=
=
J 1
ti
er
S
J �•
S 1
W
>
> C
H 1
U
oUr
J ti
cr
J f-- CL
--A 1— C=
.tea
W 1
m m
Z Z Z
Cli !>3 G
CII 1-0 CII
OQ fiY PCi
W W W
— m CQ
$ Z Y
CT
O
S 1
i 1
ti
CJ
to
r-1
Li
r
U)
} z
I.i 3
}}tz �3
31
$ L LJ
d 1— Y
!1 ` C
w cii m
_j 0-
m Ci
C L)
LU 0
J 1.1..
0 °dderr
V�
z
$WI
0
ED
i
E
U 1
tri 6 •C
O b pO
N-0
O+ m 0
O 11
11'i 1
U
6 0 0
G O O
O N N'-
--t N O
.--1 11
fes. 1
S Q t
m ;
.
O a 0
. .
0 0 0
. .
O d 0
0 0 0
11
O It
1
O 1
11
W
1
U
1
O O O
O O O
O 6 O
O O O
S
C, IUR
O
O O
O O
ex
U i
N
MN'Y "0
-o N
M
Lw
i
W
W
O
¢
Q
>
J
W
O O 1
W
U
W
I
O O u7
6 0 0
O O O
tri O O
Gi J 1
In
N
Q
U t
tri O M
O O O
O Ntl-1
h m O
O II
O 1
414
17!
0 0 0
.
O N<
—1 N O
tl
.-= fl
h 1
. 1
11
K 1
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O It
O I
W
1
1
U
¢ 1
m O
m .O
0 0
N .O
0 0
N
W
.-1-0
W 1
u'i O Ifi
0 0 0
h O
W
Z
W
0
J 7C 1
M irT
ti C
h 0
¢
_I
Q
H J I
du
N P
m
Q
S
J
W
O O 1
W
I
U
W
0 0 0
0 0 0
O tri O
O tl'i 6
A J 1
C7 O 1
O
174
N
_
1
O_ I
art
r
s
U 1
Iri O M
O p o
O +O M
h .7 O
O 11
O I
iTt
> ¢ i
. •
0 0 0
. •
O -1 aY
rl N
tY 1
0 0 0
a b 0
O O O
6 0 0
O If
O 1
W
I
f
U
t
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
>
d 1m
Q 1
O
m b
O O
N .fJ
O O
+o N
tL
W
i
W
W
cn
1
Z
W 1
h O al'i
O O O
O h ON
C�
O
r- h tSl
Q
J
Q
O
i10"I
C a 1
W
=
=I -
1
__j
U
.U.
W
J
1
to G Iri
Y7
0 0 0
O O a
w O`
u-. Ir.
h N
A Q 1
Q > 1
.M..1
/c
N
i4
iF
�
M
1
Q 1
0 0 6
0 0 0
O N O
tl
M 1
[r 1
a b 6
0 0 0
0 0 0
O O O
O 11
O 1
W
1
1
U
1
0=0'0
0 0 0
0 o O
o 0 o
a
2 I
O
0 0
O
m
Q t
- 'a
N -O
N
W
i
1
W
W
OO O
O O O
O O
O a
¢
p
J E 1
¢ zm i
M
h
IY
>
J
H J 1
Q
W
O Q f
W
=
>,
1
O O
6 0 0
U
r
J
A O 1
¢ S 1
O 1
ti
a.r
as
�rt
O .4- O
O /1
Q t
¢
O O
O O O
O .-t O
O N O
.-1 it
M t
> Q i
tr i
o O G
o 0 0
O o o
a o 0
o i i
to i
w
1
1
U
1
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
>
d 1
O
O
O
q 1
U 1
.may
N
M
MN7
tWfJ
i
W
W
W 1
O O G
Q 0 0
O- G
O O
t7
H
Q.
QJ
O O 1
M
h
ar
>
J
Ir
}
1
1
O O O
0 0 6
O aPa O
O C O
U
J
Q D I
Q > f
O I
w
�
sa
os
O 0- O
0 0 0
O t!
G I
1
O O O
O O O
O O O
0 0 0
G 11
O 1
11
I
O O O
O O O
O O O
O G O
W
U
<>
Q 1
U 1
..
N
M
N
M
�
W
1
[Ii
W I
O O O
O O O
O N a
O h o
L"
LLA
S i
� 1
O
N
Z
J
O
J 1
M
.o
Q
Q
O 1
K
>
J .U_.
J
U
W
NI
tir
¢t
S 1
OU C2i
m to
m t!i t1:t
m
fb m RYt
O-
W
I n
Ui VL In
W W W
Z g
p
O 1
6.1
bi
H
�i
co 1
HLLJ
} %
Tj {i{L�J
`� V
! G
n }
i
W, 1
U c
Ld Cr ED
i CL
u
1 H
I1
5 L",
z
LJ
S
H V')
3 QI^
O•
C H
1
d 1
U 1
H O IY7
0 0 0
O H r
r. •C- O
G If
O 1
li
Q [
N G H
0 0 0
O r H
O M d
H 11
O 1
O
1
t
U
I
O O O
O O O
O O O
O p 0
>
U t
cri-0
M
W
N
M
G'1
1
1
W
W
W 1
O O U9
O O O
O r u'9
aYi C, 6
Z
J
O
J E 1
H v
co O
O W
a
a
N
N N
O
.-�
CG
Q
>
J
W
CO d 1
W
F-- ? 1
Gt J 1
tt? N
O
O G O
IfY O O
J
U
W
O O 1
>
s
�
�
i•4
d 1
ca .- 1
a o v
b o o
G -i a
t7 v c
o 11
o I
LL
� t•- 1
? Q 1
H O •1
. .
O O G
. . .
O r H
s
G M G
. . •
H 11
11
O 1
1
11
I
O C
O O G
0
O
tl
a I
000
m ti
0 6
N
Q 6
N
S
1j I
N
M
M
[Wf]
1
1
W 1
N•] O O
O O O
6 r tfY
O b- O
W
Z
W
J
O
J E 1
a 1
tl'] N
t17 N
Co th
N N
O W
--+ O
4
sr
Q
>
J
OC3 O 1
W
O
9
W
i
1
0 0 0
0 0 0
O u] P
O 117 O
U
rr
J
Q O 1
.Q•
t
�F
w
M4
ca
U 7
P O 'V'
b 0 0
G r .p
.p O O
O 11
N 1
[i
�. 1•- 1
S ¢ 1
.-I O H
0 0 0
0 .G �-1
O N O
H 11
O 1
t>: 1
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O ii
H 1
W
i
I
U
i
o O b
0 6 0
O O p
O p p
¢ IIS}
V 1
.Q
N
N
-Q NLLI
U2
1
W
W
W 1
t('S 0 0
6 0 0
O N to
O V" O
Z
J
O
J S 1
tr] N
4*-
¢ 1
H J 1
In N
H N
N
.-a .q
a
Q
>
J
W
Q Q 1
W
�
a•
1.
L1•S O G
0 0 0
O O In
0 0 0
D J 1
O d 1
It'Y N
� N
117 C14
ly
P H
¢ ? 1
it
r 1
C i
0 0 0
Ci 0 0
O O p
O O O
p 11
1
0 6 0
O O d
p p 0
p 0 0
j
CL-
co
N
�
Q 1
U ;
pp y
N
N .D
M H
M
W
G17
1
W
W
W i
0 0 0
O P O
O N O
O V` O
Z
Q
-2
¢ 1
an
¢
>
J
CIA
W
J
V
W
1
A J 1
O O O
O
U
a•
J
d O 1
6 > 1
O_ I
V 7
O O O
O G O
O 117 O
O •.D O
O 11
LM 1
C.1
S ¢ 1
.
b 0 0
.
O .O 6
•
6 •••e p
.
11
'. II
r I
1
11
C
O O O
O G O
O p O
p O O
O 11
O I
W
1
U
1
0 0 o
p o a
G o P
o 0 0
>
IL' t
t]7
O
p
cl:
¢ 1
U f
03
N
N
M
N
M
W
1
f
W
W
U]
W 1
O O O
G O O
6 N 0
O tet- O
J
O
J S 1
T
N
Q
KL
¢ O 1
[GV
I[]
¢
>
W
O G 1
W
=
>
1
J
U
W
1
O P O
G O O
O O O
O O O
V
.
J
Ca J 1
G O 7
.p
M
13,
¢ > i
sa
tea.
at
I l i
O p o
0 6 O
G .? O
P '4' P
O 11
•4 1
�. 1••- 1
0 0 0
O O O
O 11"i O
G H P
H 11
.O 1
Gla
S Q i
CC 1
d p p
G O G
G O O
0 4 G
11
O It
I
O 1
11
t
t
W
!
O p0 p
O O G
O O G
O G O
U
ti
0-
a 1
.p
N
N
3
2
W
1
1
Sn
M
Mr
Z
J
co
H
O t
> t
2
¢
W
>
=3
J
W
S .F
H t
J
ti
W 1
1
H GC
J 1-- OC
J /- I=
U
J N
ti
7C 1
m PO fY.
an LZ
lR W CO
A11 6S
Q•
7 i
G7 07 U7
W W W
$_ m
O
d 1
7C 1
V
Ld
U) t- I
H L�
U) r 7
}
-i >-
C w
z
C IL
0
>u
U C
L; CrM
!L UD
Cz
C L1 }-i
i 1 LL
E L7
-iz
0 Lij
rQ
V
z
H .U..
¢
J ta.
tL
� Q
O �
U F-
J
i
1
A 1-
w ra
> w
t=l �
s o
d �
a
¢ U
on U
J to
1
1
�- 1•- 1
0 o a
o o a
o o a
o d o
--. u
o l
ar l
o a o
a a o
G a o
0 o G
o e
o i
W
i
1
U
1
O O O
O G d
d G O
O G O
�.
Q 1
tr
¢ I
U 1
W
on
1
1
W
W
w 1
O O o
O O O
4 O O
O b O
2
J
D
J >E 1
¢
r2
A J i
0 6 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
G O O
Q ? 1
O 1
U 1
.-•� O M
O Q O
Q .? O
m t� O
O 11
M 1
¢
OC i
O O O
0 0 0
O O G
G O G
O 11
O I
W
I
1
U
i
O O O
O O O
O O O
O G O
S
1
co O
O
O O
Ir
¢ 1
W
N
M
N
.-i M
W
on
1
W
W
O O I
ti
¢
W
W
D O I
N
¢ S
I
Q 1
U i
•-1 O M
O O O
O .¢ O
h ..p O
O tl
N 1
iC
t
O Q O
Q O O
O N O
.-1 M O
11
to
Ill 1
I
it
K 1
O O O
O G O
O O O
O O b
G to
O 1
W
i
1
U
1
O O
O O O
O O
O
Cl-
¢ 1
W
m�-y
N
0 O
.O N
W
U 1
N
M
.-1 M
W
W
[A
i
W
11".1 OIJ•i
O O O
O h+ O
ll•Y f` G
Z
_1
O
C=
J
m
O O I
W
O
>
W
1
U
J
O O 1
N
¢ ? 1
O t
O II
-O i
Q
\ H 1
O O O
O O O
O .-+ G
..•1 M O
.•� II
e=• 1
s l
o G o
G o o
v o 0
o v o
v ii
o i
W
i
i
U
C, t
as o
0
b
¢ 1
m• .a
N
M
N
.-1 M
W
to
1
1
W 1
1!'r O u7
O G O
O N O
u's N O
W
Z
W
J
p
J S l
N if7
N N•
ft M
Q
¢
y
Q
W
O O I
1-•- �. i
W
J
=
>
W
1
1
eT O ItS
O O O
O 1tr b
It? u9 O
U
ti
J
Q S 1
\ /-- I
O O O
0 0 0
O .•i O
O N O
.•H p
M i
OC I
O Cl G
0 0 0
0 0 0
O O O
O Ii
O 1
w
1
f
t.]
t
O O O
O O G
O O O
O
d 1
O
O
Occ
6 t
U i
0
H
M
M
W
G7
1
7
W
W
1
O O O
0 0 0
O Q
O 0
Z
J
p
J
1-
¢
W
O O
1
O O O
O 1/•S O
0 0 0
U
a
J
G O t
y
Q �- 1
U .-•+ 1
0 0 0
O O O
G P O
G O O
O it
O 1
G O
O O O
I
G OO
O O O
O G O
O O G
Q li
G 1
O
i
1
W
1
O O O
O 6 O
O O O
O O O
�
d I
O
p
p
>
�X;
U 1
1
N•j
p.?
W
I
W 1
O O G
O G O
O N p
O h O
V
w
t�
W
O
N
Z
J
p
> 1
¢
>
W
W 1
J 6- ICL^
J f- tr
J
J H lr
U
J M
¢1
S 1
Im O 67
on 5 W
VQ m
W W
C4 C]
P
W 1
1 i
Z
Z Z
US Gf1 G')
W W W
L"
MK
36 i Y
p
on
11--1
1
C]
LLI
:,I-
ra
>
1
I c
arl i > B
�- oz, r
D IL
W- C U)
il CD
C L)
w a -
V.
-5--
Z
.0 W1
>
I
<>
c-
;2--
=3
u-
cm
<r
_j
C> C>
cm
11
C>
2
O
C>
I
r4
IX0
L" 1
C>E-3
V,
U-
cm
-1
—1
W
Q
<r
t� ca f
<r
J
J
<>
O
O
=1 11
14
LL
C> C>
"j
I
I
co
coti
C>
iZ
L"
<>
O ul.
inQ
¢_j
J 1
CD I
CN
LU
_jLU
O c>
C> c> G
C�, tr-� c>
c-, e>
_j
C>
C>
G 1:
co
QI
1:1 C'�
I
of
-
it
it
<>
I
C. I
co
w -43
U3
Lu
Ls
CN C>=3
Z
1— _jCN
CZ) C)
t-- ="
Ln
Q C3 1
C14
:> I
C-1
I
C, f
C-) I
LU
in
C-1
U-1
A-_
__j
o
I.— _j I
cm M
:>
'o
-Ir
cl
<> O
O O C>
cc A
c> C> c>
O G O
0 0 0
O C-- c>
O 11
<--
i It
t
w
0- 1
<>
O O <=>
<> lc> c>
C>
N
Of
4=>w
1714 <>
V)
21!
--1
I
C3 I
Lu 1
__j i— cc
--i i— K
-A o—
cn En tn
31:
cn
V
M z
." W
ill �
{ C Q
3
U �
lU 'vr7l
_A €L W
}- 3
w -,
J!
II
J
V
W
S
¢ LL
� lL
;E 4
V 1--
1
O 1
[.,.] �-.1 1
✓'1 —0 11'7
-0 t� d
'n '.t W
m W W
O II
M 1
A
} 6 1
[fC 1
0 0 0
O O 6'
O O O
4 0 0
11
O II
I
O 1
II
W
1
U
1
O O O
O O O
O 6 O
O O O
S
<C t
Q t
m O O
W N-0
co O 6
m N -0-i
m O O
W m-0
co O O
m W-0
a
W
U i
1
N M .-1
N M
N 'Q' ti
N V' ."t
U
Lij
J
LI7
LI
m
M a1'7 N17'>
CT O
C- N
N 177 M
Z
¢
J
Q
C7i
O cm
N
.-i lf7 M
N .•t7 —0
— M --i
W
w
9
V
J
w
W
7 i
1
af7 O 6
O 17) O
O O /f]
11'7 6 0
J
Q Q I
Q
1
O 1
w
♦.F
aF
U r-. i
C' —0 t77
—0 t•. O
N
h
O
m W "1
.-I N O
d tl
.-t II
_
1
m 1
G
7 4 I
1
0 0 0
6 0 0
11
O 1i
1
O 1
11
W
U
I
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
S
0. 1m
/S I
O O
co N-0
m O O
m N-0
m O O
W m
m O O
m m
W
W-0
W 1
h. fr
G ti@
M 177 t�
O C- N
Z
J
L,
D
¢ O 1
.N-1 O V'
N N
—0 IC7
.-+ IC7 M
.-i O• t'�
N .O 17'7
N M
119 ~
Q
OC
Q
?
J
c J 1
O c 1
4
W
p
W
S
I
u") 177 b
1f'] If5 6
O 11'7 IY7
p In to
.v-.
-
W
A O 1
M
-d
Q ?
�, i- 1
Q 1
O O .-+
O --I N
0 6 N
.-+ •-1 O
•
.-4 tl
It
—0 1
1
11
CL I
1
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O It
D I
W
t>
I
1
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O 6
}
0. I
Q 1
V 1
m 0 0
m N-0
N M .-1
O O O
W N-0
N M -i
m O O
m m-0
N V' .-1
m 0 0
W W •CI
N a' .--1
m
W
G7
j
W
U
W
O
W
W 1
N W t-
U'7 —0 W
M O N
2
J
O
J i 1
.-1 Q• Ill
.-1 N .--I
.-1 il'i —0
N M V'
O• 11'1 t1
M }•.
¢
['G
6
S
J
OC3 C2 1
O 1
4
W
W
F-- S
1
U
J
I
C3 J 1
O
m
0 0 6
0 0 0
6 0 0
a la 1
ar-
¢ ? 1
CM
L-7 i
,.
�.
+.
..
N'7
O 11
Ceo 1
¢
Q t
m 1
O
O O O
O --1 N
O O O
O O O
O 0 0
•-+ •--� O
O 0 0
'+ 11
to
O 11
1
O 1
11
W
1
U
t
1
_
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
S
0. 1
CQ 0 0
co O O
W O O
co O O
�
Q 1
1
CO N
W N-0
N M .-1
W m
N d"'
W m-0
N rl
W
W
W
[7}
W I
N •-1 N
ICo —0 W
S O N
177 177
u'7 V- f-
N n
U
Z
Q
p
J
Q
W
O
r J 1
N Mr—
M h�
CC
¢
}
J
W
1-CD,
0- j 1
J
U-+
W
a p 1
p 1
K
M.'
ri
W1
N-0 O•
O O
h- •?' 6
M +-1 M
O� 177
O 11
M 1
m
CC i
1
6 6 0
0 0 6
O O O
O d 0
O 11
O 1
W
U
f
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
}
0. 1
Q 1
O O O
-0 N-0
O O O
-0 —0 N
O O O
-0 N-0
O O O
.� N—0
cc
w
W
1 C-3
W
W
cn
W i
N .-1 N
lr'+ .n m
M O NU')
.C' tom.
2
J
O
J S I
M m tt
rl IA --1
--1 177 IA
N tri P-
4
Q
LU
1- 1
J
L.1
W
1
117 O lf7
O. O Y"7
af7 O O
177
O J 1
a C:. 1
M N
N W N
M-0
M -1
•-+
4 ? 1
O I
X14
•!
M
•1F
U i
"� f•-- 1
N 177 /-
O G O
-0 N-0
O .-1 .-1
ti cl"M
r+1 4
f� O �Y
O II
11'7 1
Ih i
Q
LSA 1
O O O
O O O
O O O
6 0 0
O 11
G 1
11
i
W
t1. 1
4 i
O
CN b
—0 —0
N
0 0 0
—0 04-0
O O O
—0 N-0
6 0 0
—0 N-0
}
w
W
1
1
W
W
G7
w 1
t^. .-+ .^-1
N 1!?
177 •Q M
T
m O N
^ •�Y
O +? N
—0
U
p
LL
O
1
•--1
f^^Y N
N
N -NO
6
0.
d
3
V
J A
? t
W
3 aF
+I-
W 1
IC 1
_l 1- CC
A= Cs
J k- w
W m en
-..l 1- cr-
en Po m
J I- cr-
m PCI CQ
.¢+
O.
W 1
� 1
Z Z Z
cn En <n
W W W
Z a i
O
1 1
U
U-1
1
t -f
G U
O
1
a �
UI U
U
J Cn
\ 1-
1 N •C- .d•
L
-ti M .-r
W <E �!
.-1 11
J L ED
11
Lm c z
1 d a o
CL i i t -t
4 0 0
Lr
O 11
LI L
o
t
1
z
.0..
V L
h
i -E
E
O O G
1
G
1
O
1
U
1 M v7 Wco
\ 1-
1 N •C- .d•
G --+ .�
-ti M .-r
.-•1 N .-.
.-1 11
O I
11
CC
1 d a o
O p o
4 0 0
6 G 0
O 11
W
t
1
U
1 dQ O
O O G
O O O
G O O
>
a
¢
IJ
1 SO G
1 CO N .0
CII 0 0
W N .O
W O O
CSI CSI .O
co O O
co CSJ .O
IY
W
C]
; N M .••1
N M .--I
N .tl' .-1
N V' .-1
W
W
En
w
I
1 h SSI .O
CV N O
h O
2
J
0
J SI
Lr) r- .p
h
aY IS'1 M
N
[7Lt u'I OOI
In N
Cn Cit m
M Q• N
¢
OC
¢
}
J
O
}
W
J
?
W
d •J
I
1 C.1
0 0 0
O d
O O O
U
rU
J
d O
1
1
d
U
1
1 N -8 O
S70 '-+ s7-
h N co
M .•-1 CA
G 11
P 1
W
`� k-
> ¢1
f [`J +F .C'
O --e .-•1
..-t t''? rt
+--I N �•1
.••� 11
O 1
sI
o o G
f
o a o
0 o a
G G G
o If
.-, i
lit
U
1 O O O
O O O
O O O
O G O
CI.
¢
1 O G O
1CSI N .4
W O O
m N •[I
m O O
co m-4
m O O
co O .O
CC
W
U
; N M .-+
N M .-•1
N 'V' .-1
W
W
m
W
1
1 N M +-I
N N G
.-+ O O
G h O
Z
J
d
J
; .17 Hh
N M N
m
•a• O N
[D m CSI
M P N
¢
a
¢
}
J
1�••
i3 O
1
..-f
Q
w
�
W
>
t- }
I
D .J
1 aC] 6 4
f O N II'S
n'] IT'] O
.Oi
O Srs O
Iri N
afs ul7 O
O .tI .i]
1 K
K
w
K
O
U .-.
1
1 m H'i CSI
.p .--1 �1'
f� 1'•. ••O
O Q•
CC
1 O G O
1
1
O O G
0 0 0
0 0 0
6 11
O 1
W
U
1 O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
>
cL
to C• O
I A] N—
CA G O
m N .S]
CX)co O C•
m O •D
W O O
LA QI .G
OC
W
U
i N M .-1
N M .-•1
N st• .-1
N 4 .-•1
[n
I
W
W
W
1 h M ti
N In .-1
h h q
h et M
.-i tl'i O
m P .a
111A N O
h N N
Z
¢
J
Q
O
N
SF h N
cq .S N
a
>
J
0 O
1
W
=
>
H>
7
1
J
U
r
W
J
C-1 J
A O
1 O G Ia-a
1 M-0 t!'I
1 M
O O O
M
O O In
II'I
-�
Ir O O
N
¢ >
1
O
K
1
K
K
K
U
�. H
>
1 O `�' M
i
O ti .-•I
.-f .-1 G
O O ••1
It
O i
Cl-
G O O
0 0 0
0 0 0
Q O O
G tl
q I
Lit
1
i
U
O:d O
0 0 0
C• O G
O o 0
��•.
tL
Q
1 O O O
i ' N .O
coO
W G O
W N .O
O
m QI m .a
O
m m -43
[1
W
W
U
; N M
N M .^•1
N V' .-1
CN
N
W
W
1
C+ C7 1!7.
h -•a M
UCS It"f
m ZT O
O N O
Lr N N
Z
s=
J
Q
O
6 0
F.-1 M ICS
+-I M N
et r- .-1
N t N
CC
>
J
I- J
d O
1
1
W
=
W
>
t
O O
O 6 G
O O 6
U
J
C O
I
Q >
1
U .-.
I N
.•-•I 6 'V'
q It] h
.{t 1✓S �•
G 11
co 1
LL
•+ F--
1 .-+ .S M
r•1 .-1 .--I
M N O
_ 1 �•1 r•1
11
11
O 1
a
1 O O O
O C> 0
0 0 0
G O O
O 11
.-1I
W
I
U
C> O O
O O O
O G O
O O O
>
CI_.
I p O O
G O q
O O O
O O O
a
¢
U
I .O N .O
i .-/ M .-1
.0 N .0
.•1 M •�•t
.[I N .a
.-s M ti
.9 N ••[]
..1 M --+
W
In
W
!
1 tom. M .II
h h O
•.-1 tC]
O N O
W
2
W
J
O
J S
1 P P If1
h M
LI} IT C, O
N N
Q
Q
NJ
I
C,4 .et• N
a
¢
>
J
W
O O
1
t 11'a O t1'a
G aIi O
O O
Ir G 9
i.l
U
M
W
J
Ci O
M tt'I ai-
coW vt- N
.C- h v
+T >
I
O
U
1 O .ST P
[T W N
Ii'I O u"I
M! rY .-1
G it
ti 1
\ �--
1 .--t M N
O G .-1
N N O
.-/ •.-1 .-I
..•1 11
(T• 1
W
CC
0
O d d
O O O
O 11
6 i
11
W
1 G O G
G G O
6 6 O
O O O
U
d
1 O O G
O 6 Cs
O O G
O G O
j
U
i .-•1 M
.-1 M .-1
N .�-.
-.O N .�-•1
CI:
W
W
1
I N M
h N O
11'>
Ifa N O
U
�
W
. Ll •
O
CA• II'9
[IO ca
O Y"J m
Z
J
O
O
1
-r
}
I
¢
W
O
W
> v
Z
W
1
1 J
1E
I Oq W Cl
cm
W
w.cn
W
1 Z Z Z
en
6fI Cds Cn
W W
I" W
3 i 3C
3m
p
O
1
=
1
V
H
1.%
10 1m
I-.
0
C ?�
3 � H
f� � � �I
L � y 4
i <1 �n
.i IL z
L)
I rL
W i
v
J
ED
1
p
I 1
i mIO
J I
> Q
0 0! 0
1
.-i N O
G
.U..
SW.l `l 1
CL LL 1
�
; O d d
1
O d 0
O O O
C.
O 11
O 1
W
U
Q Q 1
1 O p p
O O G
O 4 0
6 0 0
>
2 LC 1
1-- 1
J 1'
f1
Q
UI
G
1W
1 CO m N
N M
LO O
m N
N M
M O O
t17 N -0
N M --I
0 0 0
. LY CO -0
-r Y- .-e
Li
cfl
Q n 1
Z 1
1
1
W
GS
W
=
Ly
C 1
J S
1
N O
n-0
Ili O m
C14— t-')
-0
coQ}
N --1
st M N
- .-r, ar N
Q 1
1
W
J
U
�
ti
?
W
J
1
i
A J
1 0 0 0
1
0 0 0
O O IC}
O O O
1
C3 a
1
1
I +w
M
M
I
I
Q
U
1
I m I!} O
.f- O a
U
a 1
¢
1
> Q
1 .
Nit
.
^.
^. 11
In 1
1
11
W 1
J l
OC
i O O G
1
p O G
0 0 6
0 0 0
O 11
O 1
W
U
Q
Q
1CC)O
1 m m CV
LL O
¢t N
O O
m W N-0
0 0 0
-0 co -0
LC
W
I, I
J LL
LL t
13
1 N M
i
N M
N M ---I
-r
W
W
S ¢ t
i
J =
1 M O Ifs
!-+ h -0
N M �
.-+
f
-Q st
CO
¢
¢
[.f7 1
= I
I- J
O O
1
1
Q
Ly,l
�
LLI
>
1
C O
¢ >
1
I
1 �F
i4
in
aM
1
1
O
f-71
1
1 W In O
of O 6
V -O N_
d- M
6 if
Lr 1
Q
It
91
ICa 1
13 U 1
0 Cl
1
O O O
O O p
O O O
O
O I
W
U
W
t p O p
G O O
0 0 0
0 6 0
>
> aL 1
cm IL 1
tL
Q
t Co. d
1LL N
ISS O
LL N
B O O
m N-0
O O O
-0 Tp -0
CC
W
K Q 1
Ci OG 1
U
1N M
I
N M
N M .-�
.--I sY .-y
W
W
co
CL F- t
f
-0
O'^ N O
I['7 Lt'Y M
-O N --I
Z
J
IM
V 1
Gf) U i
J S
Q
1 N O I19
1 N
O fes. -CS
v' M N
N O-
•1 It] .-y
-0 V- st
-0 .-I
4
CG.
¢
>
J
= L.Q 1
J t
F-- J
Q O
1
/
¢
LSA
W
I
I
LJ.S
♦U-.
LU
J
i
0
1
M 1
OC
1 p O G
G p 0
O O O
O O O
d 11
O 1
W
S f
1
1
1
U
0 0 0
O O O
>
2 I
Ci
I ISS O
CO O
L) O O
O O O
i0C
O J 1
.--� CCI
6
1 co N
N M
ISS N
N t-'>
D] N -G
N M .^I
-0 LIS -O
H@ .--i
W
LfS
f- L:7 I
I
W
W
Q 1
U
=
Iy
CO 1
J S
1 O O Ir
O 1` -0
N N
-D Q' C
¢
¢
N ^'I
.Y' NJ N
+-1 Ll's .-q
-O ti
Q
>
W
uj
=
L.S
�.
W
1
• •
1 O O d
O C_ -
C3 O
1
t
¢ >
I
1
D
1
O
-A O 6
< -Lt m
G
N N p
O -t O
O .-1 6
O G O
O O O
O O O
O O O
6 11
O I
W
3 Li- I
C7 CI- 1
1
1
U
0
0 6 0
O O O
O O O
>
[t] I
GL
1 O O
O O
O
O O
pt=
C-2;
+--1 M
M
COO
7 N
N M
it
tiZ W
I.Lf
IJS
W
W
W
1 -0 Y'+ .O
R N O
-O N •-'I
2
J
O
d
m N I
J >C
1 O LL'S
G I'^. -0
N -1 N
-O V' .IJ"
Q
Q
SC d 1
¢
¢
1 N
sl" M CV
Q
W
1
C77 i -L 1
O O
!- >
I
1
W
J
O
>
W
V 1
1
U
.U.�
J
J 1
O.
1
C� O
I1CS O O
1 M N +-I
d 11'7
i� -t11 e?'
0 0 0
C4 IT N
O O Il]
.-1 N
1
¢ >
1
1
d
r
1
wry
a�
aF
1
U •-+
1 -1 .? O
.-a -0 O
•IF M-0
sf C O
O 11
Lr, 1
1
CC
1 O O O
O G O
O O O
0 0 0
O It
O 1
11
Cf] 1
d
1
W
IXP 1t
Z ti 1
C�
1 O O
O O
G3 O G
G G
W
U7
f -C d 1
W
I
N b
LAJ
C-1tL
W C.S 1
S
/ ti LO ri-
t•7 O .-1
O N O
11'5 M ."1
.Z
J
C7
I
1
O
>
1
1
,m
W
W
> .�
t
Z
1
U
J Lf)
Q
1
1
W
S
1 J H m
1 Cli G.T
Ln m Ln LL
CL
GG d Lq
P
W
i Z 2 2
=
L
(j () L'l [l]
W
W W W W
�. a Z
O
1
1
d
S
1
1
L.?
Y
} i
— 0
C—? r�Ull Li
W Cr V
3y z
CQ C —
C Li P,
:I Ln
.Z
3 Li
r
In
1
h
3C [T Ol
O Q`
Z ++
W
1
O 1
t.3 1
1n M O
t-.-• O
N b O
—0-0 ai'i
O 11
m 1
A
1-- i
S Q I
N
• •
. O,
^. N N•
.
O N N
. .
•-a 11
11
m 1
•
o a
a o 0
0 o a
O n
o f
1
L
w
I
1
U
1
1
O G O
m O
O O O
m O
O O O
m d O
G O O
b O O
}
LU
<r
Q1
U 1
m N
N M
m N
N M
m
W3 N M
-0 m .O
W
Lfy
1
W
W
W I
f� O O
M m u7
yf] Ia'y CSS
-0 O O
Z
J
O
Q O 1
f\ CT
'r N •-a
YY C] M
N •T
m
}
J
H J 1
O ? ;
r
¢
W
O
W
S
1
1r'y 0 0
0 0 0
O P O
O O O
J
U
W
A J 1
1
O 1
w
n r
•s
U •-• 1
IA M O
M O
f� •-1 O
O •--1 O
N .0 O
.-� N N
d -0 CC'1
O N N
O 11
�-1 11
m I
m I
q
} Q 1
O O
O O O
11
O li
1
O I
11
w
I
1
O O G
O O O
O d O
C --O d
}
Cf.-
r 1
Q 1
m 0
CO CV
m 0
m N
m 0 0
m N-0
G O O
-0 m—
L"
W
U I
1
1
N M
N M
N M .-i
ti C .-y
W
V
W
=
[f]
li
W i
J lE 1
N G O
m Cl-
[T 4 IfY
M N
-0 O b
Cl t-- O
Z
¢
J
¢
O
1-
m M
c"I
Q
"!
W
O d 1
1
W
U
O
.U-.
}
W
J
1
0 0 0
O O O
0 0 6
O ar'a 1r9
A O 7
O 1
O
N •v- 1S
—0-0 1C']
O 11
N t
q
H i
N M O
O .-C O
•--1 c'! • •
. . .
O O
0 0 0
0 0 0
O 11
O 1
W
U
1
1
O O O
O O G
O O O
O d O
fl 1
Q 1m
m 0
N
an d
m N
m O G
m N
G O O
.O m
LLC
W
I
1
N M
N
.-0-r
W
W
w t
N O O
M m ar
Lr y n IT
-0 an to
Z
J
D
J E Ir-
¢ O 1.
co CT
-0 C,
m 0 M']
-r N --1
M t- O
M n M
0T M C�
N M
¢
C=
¢
}
�!
1- J
(3 0 1
WCj
1 ? 1
J
U
W
A J 1
O O i
-40 G O
0 0 0
6 0 0
M
O P O
¢ } 1
O
�4
iF
a4
i*
C.3 1
ti M O
Wr .ti O
ry �' n
•.t] -0 11"1
G It
r— 1
q
} Q 1
N M O
O •--1 O
•-� N •-1
O N N
[r I
1
G O O
O 0 0
O C7 0
O O O
O It
O 1
W
U
1
O O -O'
GO 0 0
O O O
O G O
}
d 1m
Q tm
0
.N
m G
W N
m O O
m N-0
O O O
[Zy
Cr
W
U I
N M
N M
N M .--I
.-0r .-0ti
at
CAI
1
w
w
w 1
J `E 1
N O b
.-+ en CT
M m afy
m b �
Il"a art Cf.
M t� N
..(y I1'] I.r1
CT M C'�
t=
¢
J
¢
O
Q = 1
.[] LT
•-C N •.--�
M 1- N
CI M
Cr
D.
J
O O
H } i
1
J
V
.U -.r
W
J
A J 1
<> 0
L. O 1
¢ ? 1
O 1
MF
M
♦L
♦F
U .-. I
m M O
•-1 .-C O
N� r'..
ICY ct O
O 11
CfS 1
LL
}¢I
M M O
-1 �.-1 O
.-i N •1
O M O
11
It
1
OI
If
m I
G O O
G O O
0 0 6
O C? d
O
1
W
I
U
1
O O 6
O O O
O G O
O P O
}
ZL 1
O O
b b
m 0 0
m N-0
O O
-0 m
0=
W
U I
M
M
N M •--1
--+ •�1-
Cly
1
W
W
W 1
N O O
M m Irf
a1'i IL'7 CT
..p Ir] Ifi
Z
.J
O
m CT
m G
M I'� t�
0- M CT
¢
Q
4 O 1
W
=
}
!- 1
i
1
IL'y P KS
O u'S U'7
O Cry O
IJ7 lr1 O
J
U
U
•.-.
W
J
O J 1
O n •-'1
M M N
.O M aC'y
rt .-1 1'�
Q } 1
O !1
�
ur
na
aw
C%4 m
O
O b
O
I
M N
N .��
b N 0
It
m I
q
? Q I
Lr i
.
O 0 0
.
G O O
G O O
O CS O
11
O 11
O 1
11
1
1
w
i
6 O O
O G G
O G O
G O O
V
aZ 1
O O
O O
m 0 0
O O
W
¢ 1
[3 I
N
M
N
M
mN .O
N M +--1
--0-• m
sf-
L"
w
1
V?
O
O CT
O yff
Lw_l
=
LL
I
t^..
tC'7 f� M
1-
f-+ st N
m N N
Z
J
O=
J i
6 1
CG m
Q
?
J
} 1
Q
W
J
W
? •1F
r 1
J
W 1
Z /
W
GC
J k ---.d1
U
.V•
J 2
Z 1
riy m Cya
"^'
07 CL ff1
0;i W C.
m m 6+
W 1
Z Z
N En C"
w W w
3 3 Z
O
O i
7C t
FILE ea ^�
d 01-PAR7Mfk7 OF
.
Yli RfG10NAL#Li►NNING
170 Weft 7�rno4 Stree�
Lot Angeit>
calAorn's goo 12
March 15, 1989
C.P. Lange Engineers
840-K West 9th Street
Upland, CA 91786
RE . INITIAL STUDY DETERMINATION LETTER
PROJECT NO. 88507 (PM 20358)
974-6411
.lames E. Hartl,AICP
Acting Planning Director
Ram—
On March 15, 1989 ,the staff of the Department of Regional
Planning completed its review of the Environmental Questionnaire
and other data regarding your project,and made the following
determination as to the type of environmental document required.
L% Use of previously prepared Environmental Document
/% Categorical Exemption
Negative Declaration
L� Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
For EIRs only it is necessary that you submit two (2) copies of
your Draft EIR to the planning staff for an initial review. Subsequent
to our review, we will advise you on the completeness of the document
and request a formal submittal to the Department. This formal submittal
includes a $ fee and copies of the EIR. The fee is
in addition to the Initial Stu Ey fee or other case processing fees.
The EIR is to address the factor(s) checked under "Summary of Significant-'
Effects" on the -attached Initial Study. The format and content
for discussing this factor(s) is enclosed. Also, we are enclosing
the "Content and Format for Environmental Impact Reports".
If you have any questions regarding the above determination or
environmental document preparation, please contact Ju1i
RPA II of the Impact Analysis Section at 213 974-6461.
Sincerely,
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING
James E. Hartl, AICD
Acting Director of Planning
Fran Ruo. AICP
Supervising Regional Planner,
Impact Analysis Section
FK:fe
Attachments
Section Manager
4
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING
320 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELS, CALIFORNIA 90012
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NO. 88507 (PM -20358)
1. Description:
A parcel map for the commercial development of 7 office buildings.
2. Location:
1320 X 1340 S. Valley Vista Drive, Diamond Bar
3. Proponent:
P K Diamond Bar Venture No. 1, LP
818 Vest 7th Street, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
4. Findings of No Significant Effect
Based on the attached Initial Study and Condition(s)
(if applicable), it has been determined that the projects Q1
will not have a significant effect on the environmen*.
Prepared by: Julie Cook, RPA TT
Date: March 15, 1989
PROJECT NUMBER-,
STAFF USE ONLY CASES: PM Z 0*3 5.8
S uEs.
* * * * INITIAL STUDY
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PIAN LING
GENERAL INFORMATION
Pia; /Case Date: 11-3-S6 Staff Member: CIO OKI
�A
Thomas Guide: q 7Z Dt — Z. tt 3uses Quad: Y01Zt3A LI N -SAN Al MAS
Location: ! 2O ti 1x-40 S. VA L t -EY VISTA D4.I V E .
DIAMOND BAR,.
Description of Project: A 'PARCEL 042 ME 7fi-E COMMMUAL
DEVl~1P'M �I 17 OF :7 OFFICE 13 U 1 LDI NCis .
Gross Area:: ZZ 2-e 686 S E I A G.
Environmental Setting: 5ITr::�: Is VACANT. EXISTING K006f+ 69ADE-D
PAD AT_Z*76 WIT14 SLOPES AKOUND THt EA7T!:F,1nr• TH- E—
OlzAN6E I=Wy• 1S TO
T+fS WEST-
Tdt� SURROUNDING
AREZ,
44AS -THF SAM -E RONIN&.
WIT44 QFF1CjF_
&Q1 t—DN6&
To
S w ' NE:, AND
TH'E
LAND
IS V4<A-N7"
Zoning: CMSE — LX, General Plan: -3WE>L35-... a
Camunicy/Areawiae Pian: VIAM l0' iV D 5444.
- i -
Major projects in area:
Project Numbers Description
NOTE: For EIR's, above projects
are not sufficient for cumulative analysis.
REVIEWING AGENCIES
Responsible Agencies
Special Reviewing Agencies
Regional Significance
j /f Hone
/ /
None
/ / None
%ff Regional Water Quality%
/
Topanga-Las virgenes%
/ SCAG Criteria
Control Board
Conservation District
_r% Air Quality
Los Angeles Region%
/
Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy
_
/ / Water Resources
_
Lahontan Region
J
National Parks%
/ Santa Monica Mtns
/ / Coastal Commission
Trustee Agencies
/--7 None
State Fish and Game
State Parks
National Forest
Edwards Air Force Base
- 2-
Area
F
" )UZALYSIS &UMRY individual purges for details)
i?4'1'_.T AIIUhLYSIS KNTRIX: A t nnignificant Tail -.act - - -
G gn scant Inpact
Ima
Factor E Potential Com rn
WIZARDS Geot cal 5
Food 6,, -
Fire ✓'
F re 7 ��
Noise $
RESOURCES Water Quai 9-'1011✓
R� Cultural Resources 12 V
VISUAL Visual Qualities 13 ✓
CFS Tri is s 14 l✓; i F� 1';' r..tz
Sewage Di sal 15 ,/
Education 16
Fire/Sheriff 17
Utilities
General 191 A
Environ. Safety 29
Eml-UNATION: On the basis of this Initial Study, -the Department of Regional Planning finds
that this project qualifies for the following environmental dost:
eliminary FI
\X--;; NEGATIVE DECLARATION, inasmuch as the proposed project will not have a
41'_ sign icant effect on the environment.
L7 L1 NEmTIVE DECL.mTION, inasmuch as ee ranges required for the project
will reduce impacts to insignificant: levels (see "Conditions", page 4).
L.t Z7 mwIR0t*MTTAL IMPACT RJ�PORT, inasmuch as there is substantial evidence
that the project may have a significant impact due to factors listed
above as "significant'.
L/ uete=.1nation appeal=—see atracnea enact.
Fnvirormental Finding (Negative Declarations)2
Zg An -Initial Study tins prepared on this project in ccmpiiance with the State CEQA
ND Guidelines and the environmental reporting procedures of the County of Los Angeles.
It was deteamined that this project will not exceed the established threshold cri-
teria for any environmental/service factor and,, as a result, will not have a signi-
ficant effect on the physical environnent.
An Initial Study was prepared on this project In compliance with the State CSA
NEC Guidelines and the environmental reporting procedures of the County of Los Angeles_
It was originally determined that the proposed project may exceed established thres-
bold criteria. The applicant bas agreed to modification of the project so that it
can now be determined that the project will not: have a significant effect gn the
physical environment. The modification to mitigate this L"ct(s) is identified on
the Acceptance Letter included as part of this Initial Study.
WTE: findings for invirocroental Impact Reports will be prepired as a separate document
following the public bearing on,the project.
Aer7iewed by: Date:
-3-
PROJECT CHANCES/C3MITIONS-_
_1% Prior to ( l recordation of the final map ( ) issuance of a building permit and as a means
of mitigating potential environmental impacts, it must be demonstrated to the satisfaction
of the Regional Planning Commission that sewer connection permits can be obtained from
( ) county Sanitation District No. ( ) las Virgenes Municipal Water District or its
legal successor that meet the requi1 ements of the California Regional Water duality Cnntrol
Board pursuant to Division 7 of the Water Code.
i% Prior to alteration of any streamueds, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental
impacts, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the California State Department of
Fish and Came, pursuant to Sections 1601 through 1613 of the State Fish and Game Code.
%% Prior to ( ) tentative approval ( ) scheduling before the Zoning Board ( ) scheduling before
the Regional Planning Commission, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental im-
pacts, the applicant shall submit an archaeology report for the entire project site (unless
otherwise noted) prepared by a qualified archaeologist, and Comply with mitigation_ measures
suggested by the archaeologist and approved by the Department of Regional Planning.
f% Prior to ( ) tentative approval ( ) scheduling before the Zoning Board ( ) scheduling before
the Regional Planning Commission, and as a means of mitigating potential environmental
impacts, the applicant shall agree to suspend construction in the vicinity of a cultural
resource encountered during development of the site, and leave the resource in place until
a qualified archaeologist can examine them and determine appropriate mitigation measures.
The applicant shall agree to comply with mitigation measures recommended by the archaeolo-
gist and approved by the Department of Regional Planning.
As a condition of ( ) final approval ( ) the grant ( ) approval of the zoning ordinance,
and as a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant shall dedicate
to the County of Los Angeles, ( ) the right to prohibit construction over an area demarcated
on the ( 1 tentative map ( ) plot plan, ( ) construction of more than one residence of com-
mercial unit and related accessory building on any one lot on the project site. A note to
this effect shall be ( ) placed on final map or on the Grant Waiver ; ) recorded on the title
Prior to ( ) tentative approval ( ) recordation of the final map ( ) scheduling before the
Zoning Board ( ) scheduling before the Regional Planning Commission, and as a means of
mitigating potential environmental impacts, the applicant shall drill and test flow a
wells) to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works/Engineering Division. A
warning note shall be ( ) placed on the final map and in the CC&Rs ( ) recorded on the
title, indicating that the area has a limited groundwater supply and that water may not be
available during periods of severe drought. A copy of the ( ) CC&Rs: shall be submitted to
the Department of Regional Planning and subsequently recorded with the final map ( ) title
shall be submitted to the Department of Regional Planning for approval.
As a condition of ( ) final approval ( ) the grant ( ) approval of the zoning ordinance, and
as a.means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, a warning note shall ( ) be placed
in the CC&Rs ( ) recorded on the title, indicating that the area has a limited groundwater
supply during periods of severe drougnt. A copy of the ( ) CC&Rs shall be submitted to the
Department of Regional Planning for approval and subsequently recorded with the final map
( ) title shall be submitted to the Department of Regional Planning for approval.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall be required to enter into an
agreement with the County to pay to the County a sum not to exceed $3,500.00 per residential
unit, and not to be less than $2,000.00 per residential unit for the purpose of contributing
to the proposed Road Benefit District prior to occupancy or upon demand of payment by the
County Road Commission. Security for the performance of said agreement shall be guaranteed
by the filing of a bond by a duly authorized surety.
Prior to scheduling for public hearing, and as a means of mitigating any environmental impacte
associated with the distance of the project to the nearest fire station, the applicant shall
agree to comply with recommendations of the County Forester and Fire Warden.
ct
%/ See attaches paged for additional Project/Changes/Conditions
q _
1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1.0 Hazard Factors
1.1 Geotechnical
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N:
a. [� Is the project site located in an active or potentially
active fault zone?
b. Is the project site located in an area containing a major
landslide(s)?
c. is the project site located in an area having high slope
instability?
d. n Is the project site subject to high subsidence, high
groundwater level, or hydrocompaction?
e.Is the proposed.project considered a sensitive use
(school, hospital, public assembly site) located in
close proximity to a significant geotechnical hazard?
f. Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are: "Building Ordinance No. 2225 --
Sections 3088, 309, 310 and
311 and Chapters 29 and 70.
Other considerations: Lot Size Project Design
/7,
4
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on, or be impacted by, geotechnical factors?
Yes L3 No
5
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. ❑ Is a major drainage course, as identified on USGS
quad sheets by a dashed line, located on the project
site?
b. Q Is the project site located within or does it contain
a floodway or floodplain?
C. Is the project site located in or subject to high
mudflow conditions?
d. ❑ Q Will the project contribute, or be subject to, high
erosion and debris deposition from run-off?
L) J e J 0''VV NJ
e. Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are:
Building Ordinance No. 2225 --Section 308A
Flood Control District Drainage Concept
r] Ordinance No. 12,114 (Floodways)
Other considerations: C] Lot Size 0 Project Design
a
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on, of be impacted by, flood (hydrological)
factors?
Q Yes E( No
1 . 3 Fire
SETTING/IMPACTS
Y N
a. Is the pro7ect site located in a high fire hazard
area (Vire e Zone 9"or Quinton/Redgate fire
classification)?
b. D Is the project site in a high fire hazard area and
served by inadequate access due to length, width,
surface material, turnarounds, or grade?
c. Is the project site in a high fire hazard area and
has more than 75 dwelling units on a single access?
d. n [ Is the project site located in an area having
inadequate water and pressure to meet fire flow
standards?
e. ]�' Is the project site located in close proximity to
potential dangerous fire hazard conditions/uses (such
as refineries, flammables, explosives manufacturing)?
f. ❑ [Ho" Does the proposed use constitute a potentially
dangerous fire hazard condition/use?
g. Other Factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
;.andard mitigation measures are: Fire Ordinance No. 2947
Water Ordinance No. 7834 [3'o Fire Prevention Manual
Regulation No. 12
Other considerations: n Project Design
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could ithe project have a
significant impact on, or be impacted by, fire hazard factors?
D Yes IF( No
7
SETTING/IMPACT:
Y N
a. �t Is the project site located near a high noise source
(airports, railroads, freeway ) industry)?
b. Q QA Will the project substantially increase ambient noise
levels, including those associated With special
equipment (such as air conditioning units) or parking
areas associated with the project?
c. F1 QR Is the proposed use considered sensitive (school,
hospital, senior citizen facility)?
d. El'Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are: ❑ Building Ordinance No. 2225 --
Chapter 35
Noise Ordinance No. 11,778
Other considerations: a Lot Size Project Design
IICompatible Use
CONCLUSIONS:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on, or be adversely impacted by, noise?
El Yes Lwl No
2.0 Natural Resources
2.1 Water Quality
SETTING/IMPACT:
Y N
a. �
Q Will the proposed project require the use of a
private sewage disposal system?
If the answer is yes, is the project site located in
an area having known septic tank limitations due to
high groundwater or other geotechnical limitations?
[� Is the project proposing on-site systems located in
close Proximity to a drainagecourse?
b.t-- Will the proposed project place industrial waste
Q Q�
(corrosive or toxic materials) into a private sewage
disposal system or a community system?
c. Is the project site located in an area having known
water quality problems and proposing the use of
individual water wells?
d. Q Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are: Q Plumbing Code --Ordinance
No. 2269
Q Health Ordinance Industrial Waste Permit
No. 7583 --Chapter 5
Other considerations: [] Lot Size Lot Design
CONCLUSIONS:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on, or be impacted by, water quality problems?
Q Yes No
9
2.2 Air Quality
SETTING/IMPACT:
Y �N
a. Q L.1 will the proposed project exceed the State's criteria
for regional significance (generally (a) 500 dwelling
units for residential uses or (b) 40 gross acres,
650,000 square feet of floor area, or 1,000 employees
non-residential uses)?
b. Is the proposal considered a sensitive use (schools,
hospitals, parks) and located near a freeway or heavy
industrial use?
c. will the project increase local emissions to a
significant extent due to increased traffic
congestion or use of a parking structure?
d. n Will the project generate or is the site in close
proximity to sources which create obnoxious odors
and/or hazardous emissions?
e. Q Other factors:
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are: F-1 Health and Safety Code,
Section 40506
Other considerations: Project Design Air Quality
Management Plan
CONCLUSIONS:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on, or be impacted by, air quality?
Yes No
10
2.3 Biota
SETTING/IMPACTS
a. [�rIs the project site located within a Significant
Ecological Area or Significal Ecological Area Buffer?
b. 0 [?r Does the project site contain at major riparian habitat?
c. ❑ (Er Does the project site contain oak or other unique
native trees?
d. F-1 Er Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Other considerations: Lot Size F1 Project Design
Q Oak Tree Permit
CONCLUSIONS:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on biotic resources?
QYes No
3.0 Cultural Resources/Visual
3.1 Archaeological/Historical/Paleontological
I
SETTING/IMPACTS
Y N
a. Is the project site in or near an area containing
known archaeological resources or containing
features (drainage course, spring, knoll, rock out-
croppings, or oak trees) which indicate potential
archaeological sensitivity?
n. Q Does the project site contain rock formations
indicating potential paleontological resources?
c. Q Does the project site contain known historic
structures or sites:
d. F1 'Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Other considerations: Lot Size II Project Design
CONCLUSIONS:
`(( 3.2 Visual Qualities r
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. Q Is the project site substantially visible from or
will it obstruct views along a scenic highway (as
shown on the Scenic Highway Element) or located
within a scenic corridor?
b. [;IT Is the project substantially visible from or will it
obstruct views from a regional riding or hiking trail?
C. Is the project site located in an undeveloped or undis-
turbed area which contains unique aesthetic features?
d. Is the proposed use out -of -character in comparison to
adjacent uses because of height, bulk, or other
features?
e. Will the project obstruct unique views from surrounding
residential uses?
f. 1.13o Will the project create substantial sun shadow or
glare problems?
g. p [a other factors:
MITIGATION MEASURES
Other considerations: F-1 Lot Si ler Lot Design
Compatible Use
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the: project have a
significant impact on scenic qualities.
Yes No
a
13
4.0 Services
4.1 TraffiC/ACcesil
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. Does the project contain 25 dwelling units, or more
and located in an area with known congestion problems
(mid -block or intersections)?
b.Will the project result in any hazardous traffic
conditions?
C. [] E3 1-1 Will the project result in parking problems with a
subsequent impact on traffic?
d. During an emergency (other than fire hazards), will
inadequate access result in problems for emergency
vehicles or residents/employees in the area?
e. [] Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Other considerations.: Project Design
i J
tvl 1-1,
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
traffic/access?
II Yes ErNo
4.2 SewageDisposal�
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. If served by a community sewage system, are there
any known capacity problems at the treatment plant?
b. F-1 []T Are there any known capacity problems in the sewer
lines serving the project site?
C. Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are:
Plumbing Code --Ordinance No. 2269
Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste Ordinance No. 6130
Other considerations:
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
sewage disposal facilities?
t� l
i.__! Yes( No
4.3 Education
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. F-1 n Are there known capacity problems at the district
level?
b. ❑ Are there known capacity problems at individual
schools which will serve the project site?
C. II Are there ny known student transportation problems?
d. Q Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Other considerations: Q SB 201 Funds rl Site Dedication
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
educational facilities/services?
r (4.4 Fire/Sheriff Serv'.icea
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. 0 Ey Are there any known staffing or response time
problems at the fire station'or sheriff's substation
serving the project site?
b. rl 1� Are there any special fire or law enforcement
problems associated with the project or the general
area?
i
c. D 111"" Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Other considerations:
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
fire/sheriff services?
M Yes No
4.5 Utilities/other Services
SETTING/IMPACTS:
a_ YQ Is the project site in an area known to have an
inadequate water supply to meet domestic needs?
b. Q ✓� Is the project site in an area known to have an
inadequate water supply and/or pressure to meet fire
fighting needs?
c. Are there any known problems with providing other
utility services, such as electricity, gas, propane?
d. Q Are there any 'known service problem areas?
e. Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are:
l_1 Plumbing Code (Ordinance No. 2269)
0 Water Ordinance No. 7834
Other considerations: Lot Size Project Design
t
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
utilities/services?
11 Yes El No
5.0-- Other Factors
5.1 General Factors
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. Q FA Will the project result in an inefficient use of
energy resources?
b. E] [D' Will the project result in a major change in the
pattern, scale, or character of the general area or
community?
c. Will the project result in a significant increase in
light and/or glare?
dWill the project result in a significant reduction in
the amount of agricultural land?
e. 0 12f Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Standard mitigation measures are:
E] State Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 5, T-20 (Energy
Conservation)
Other considerations: [:] Lot Size ❑ Project Design
n Compatible Use
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on the physical environment due to
II Yes Er No
19
5.2 Environmental Safety
SETTING/IMPACTS:
Y N
a. Are any hazardous materials used, produced, or
stored on-site?
b. 0 1 Are any hazardous wastes stored on-site?
C. Q [�-j Are any pressurized tanks to be used on-site?
d. Q Are any residential units, schools, or hospitals
located within 500 feet?
e. Other factors?
MITIGATION MEASURES:
CONCLUSION:
Considering the above information, could the project have a
significant impact on public safety?
Yes �No
Diammnd Bar City Council
4 aas fwww %00W" MW am or Mov orw rwwwv
AnpN�s, Cdilor!!iM •ooTz
- MEETWO DATE
CONTWE TO
�OM(M)
7-11-89
MEMBERS VOTMM NO
PROJECT No. 88-507 (1
AGEMMffEM
own PARCEL MAP N0. 20358
PEnnow
1(0) 1(0)
Pic WARM DATE
7-11-89
APPUCAW
OWNER FK lamon a
RFRESMATTVE
The Koll Company
Ventura No. 1r �j
C.P. Lane Engineers
REOUNT
To create seven (7) commercial lots on 5.1 acres.
U)MVON/ADDMM
ZDNED DOTRICT
At west side of Gateway Center Drive, between
Brea Canyon
Valley Vista Drive and Bridge Gate Drive in
GOWUNRY
Diamond Bar.
ACCESS
Diamond Bar
ElOSTO ZONM
CMBE
Valley Vista Drive
am EXMsrm LAND USE
8HAPE
TOPOGRAPHY
5.1.ac. Vacant
Irregular
Generally level
SU RROUNDM LAND USES l ZOPMNG
Nona: Vacant, CMBE
East Vacant, CMBE _
South: Office Bldg/Vacant, CMBE _
west Orange Free
GOMM PLAN
DMQNAn0N
YAXMMUM DENSITY
coNSIaTacr
COUNTYWDE
Major ommer—
cial
N/A
Consistent
iamon ar
AREA/COMMUNITY
Industrial
N/A
Consistent
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
Negative Declaration
DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN DENSITY
Vacant land, rough graded at 2% with slopes around the ex- N/A
terior, to be subdivided into 7 lots for commercial deve-
lopment.
MAY GSUES
Access - Subdivision is to be served by only one driveway off of
Valley Vista Drive.
(T-10
Traffic - Approximately 448W vehicle trips per day to be generated by
this project, resulting to a total of 15,540 trips per day
for the Gateway Corporate Center.
Note: Refer to attached letter from the Department of Public Works
dated July 21, 1988 for analysis of Traffic Study and recommended
mitigation measures.
9ffW0 opw a MW*04 ua qw8ft ad.)
.':«.;'.I��aly■I•':IA"[•;:[a�:?�=;i•l-'�:l�la■7-tii�:li.'..T�7. .. :.�_.A,:..:-
STAFF CONTACT PERSON - - - - - - - -- -- -- -
RPC MEARMM DATEIS)
RPC ACTION DATE
RPC RE001►MM"TMJN
MEMBERS AVE
MEMBERS VOTMM NO
MEMBERS AWAY"
STAFF REOOMMENOATION rMR TO MEAW 4)
SPEAKERS*
(4) (Fl
PEnnow
1(0) 1(0)
LETTERS
(Fl
- (0) - OPoww* (F) - An Fwor
THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. DE»ewe
CECIL L SUCH. Chid Depot Dke wr
WAS MAGAM16 Awbao D6view
July 21, 1988
C(r`AV OF LOS ANGEir'50
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
M SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA *11883-1331
Tdereer. (918)155.5191
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
►A. SOX 14"
ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA VIM -14"
Mr. James E. Hartl
Acting Planning Director
Department of Regional Planning
County of Los Angeles
320 west Temple Street
Attention Mr. Frank Kuo
Impact Analysis Section
Dear Mr. Harti:
REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY
PROJECT NUMBER 87558, CUP 87558
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER
N REPLY MiASE
RERR TO RLE:
T-2
850.27.14
As requested, we reviewed the revised traffic study submitted in response
to our comments dated March 7, 1988 for the: subject project located on
the south side of Golden Springs Drive east: of the 57 Freeway 1n Diamond
Bar. The following information is provided for inclusion in your response
to the Department of Regional Planning.
We generally agree that the revised project:, which includes the addition of
a 184 -room hotel and one -acre of professional office use to the originally
proposed 37 acres of light industrial use, 35 acres of professional office
use, and 2 acres of restaurants, would generate approximately 1,800 vehicle
trips per day, resulting in a total of approximately 15,540 trips per day
for the total Gateway Corporate Center.
At the intersection of Golden Springs Drive/Gateway Center Drive, we
recommend dedication of additional right of way and installation of an
exclusive eastbound right -turn lane to the satisfaction of this
Department.
At the intersection of Golden Springs Drive/Copley Drive, we recommend
extension of the existing westbound left -turn pocket to provide a minimum
of 300 feet storage for peak -hour traffic volumes. At this intersection,
we disagree with restriping the south approach to provide a left -turn
lane, an optional left -/right -turn lane, and a right -turn lane I"teadrof
C.
r . w
L.tJ
Mr. James E. Hartl -2- July 21, 1988
the existing dual left -turn lanes and a right -turn lane. Turning dual
rights across a pedestrian crosswalk create problems because motorists in
the outside turn lane cannot easily see pedestrians in the crosswalk.
Providing additional capacity for northbound right turns would not signi-
ficantly improve overall intersection capacity inasmuch as the right turns
can be made concurrently with the Golden Springs Drive westbound lefts.
We recommend that the improvements to the above two intersections be the
7 responsibility of thedeveineer end detailed striping plans should be
prepared to the satisfaction of this Department,.
We disagree with the level of service analysis for the intersection of
Brea Canyon Road/Colima Road. For each scenario, the Intersection
Capacity Utilization calculations do not correctly identify all the
critical movements. We generally believe that the level of service would
degrade to unacceptable level E and F during the AM and PM peak hours upon
occupancy of the Gateway Corporate Center. We generally agree that
construction of a dual southbound left -turn lane and a free northbound
right -turn lane could mitigate a portion of the cumulative traffic
Impacts. We generally agree with the proposed localized widening for
Installation of an additional through lane on the west approach; however,
since Golden Springs Drive is classified as a Secondary highway with only
two eastbound through lanes east of the subject intersection, we recommend
localized widening of the eastbound exiting leg to provide adequate road-
way for merging vehicles.
At the intersection of Golden Springs Drive/Grand Avenue, we do not ._
believe the proposed mitigation measures provided in the report could
realistically be constructed. Based on a recent analysis by this
Department, we believe feasible improvements to this intersection would
involve localized widening to provide three through lanes in each direc-
tion on Grand Avenue, two through lanes in each direction on Golden
Springs Drive, dual left -turn lanes, an exceusive right -turn lane on
each approach, and bike lanes on Golden Springs Drive.
At the intersection of Golden Springs Drive/Diamond Bar Boulevard, we
generally agree that the cumulative traffic impacts could be mitigated by
constructing dual left -turn lanes on both the north and south approaches
from Golden Springs Drive to Diamond Bar Boulevard and an exclusive right -
turn lane from westbound Diamond Bar Boulevard i:o northbound Golden
Springs Drive.
We recommend that * the developer Contribute a pro rata share of the cost
for localized widening to construct the above recommended mitigation
2 > measures at the intersections of Brea Canyon Road/Colima Road, Golden
Springs Drive/Grand Avenue, and Golden Springs Drive/Diamond Bar
Boulevard.
Mr. James E. Hartl -3- July 21, 1988
The site plan for the proposed hotel shows the driveway at Gateway Center
Drive to be located along the inside of a horizontal curve. We recommend
7 relocation of this access point to provide 40 MPH sight distance.
Additionally, we believe the one proposed driveway would provide poor
circulation for the hotel's 200 -stall parking lot. We suggest that a
second driveway be provided to improve circulation. We recommend the
developer provide detailed signing and striping plans for Gateway Center
Drive to the satisfaction of this Department.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact our
Traffic Studies Unit at (818) 458-5909.
Very truly yours,
T. A. TIDENANSON
Director of Public Works
WROGER M. BURGER/
Deputy Director
SES:cm
FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20358
1. The tentative map proposes to create seven (7) commercial lots
on approximately 5.1 which are situated within the CMBE zone
classification in the Brea Canyon Zoned District.
2. The property is depicted within the Major Commercial category of
the Countywide General Plan and within the Industrial category of
the Diamond Bar Community General Plan. The proposed subdivision
and the provision for its design and improvements are consistent
with the goals and policies of the General Plan and with the zone
classification.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development being
proposed, since it is generally level; has access to County -main-
tained streets; shall be served by .sanitary sewers; shall be pro-
vided with water supplies and distribution facilities, with suffi-
cient capacity to meet anticipated domestic and fire protection
needs; and shall have geologic hazards and flood hazards mitigat-
ed in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Public
Works.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and
avoidable injury to fish or wildlife: or their habitat, since the
project is not located in a Significant Ecological Area and the
initial study for the project shows that the proposed development
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvments will
not cause serious public health problems, since sewage disposal,
storm drainage, fire protection, and geological and soils factors
are addressed in the recommended conditions of approval.
6. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for
future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the
project. The design of the subdivision is based upon the size and
shape of the parcel.
7. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public
waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake or reservoir.
8. The division and development of the property in the manner set
forth on this map will not unreasonably interfere with the free and
complete exercise of the public entity and/or public utility rights-
of-way and/or easements within this map, since the design and dev-
elopment as set forth in the conditions of the case and on the ten-
tative map provide adequate protection for easements.
9. The discharge of sewage from this land division into the public
sewer system will not violate the requirements of the California
Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (Commencing
with Section 13000) of the Water Code.
FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2:0358 Page 2
10. The housing needs of the region were considered and balanced
against the public service needs of local residents and availa--
ble fiscal and environmental resources when this project was
determined to be consistent with the Los Angeles County General
Plan.
11. The Negative Declaration which has been prepared complies with
the California Environmental Quality Act, and that this proposed
division of land will not have a significant effect on the envi-
ronment.
THEREFORE, the tentative map and Negative Declaration are approved
with the conditions recommended by the :Los Angeles County Subdivision
Committee.
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20358 Map Date: 2-17-89
1. Conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and the
CMBE zone.
P. Permission is granted to adjust lot; lines to the satisfaction of
the City of Diamond Bar.
2. Provide reciprocal easement over the driveways and parking spaces
for the benefit of all the lots being served.
4. Provide slope planting and an irrigation system in accordance
with the Grading Ordinance. Include conditions in the tract co-
venants which would require continued maintenance of the plantings
for lots having planted slopes. Prior to recordation, submit a
copy of the document to be recorded: to the City of Diamond Bar.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
TRACT/PARCEL MAP N0: 7,C=.3!5% TENTATIVE MAP DATED
The following report consisting of 12 pages are the recommendations of the Depart-
ment of Public Works: The following comments/requirements for this tentative map are in-
dicated by an X in the appropriate box along the left margin of the page.
Details and notes shown on the tentative map are not necessarily approved: Any
details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirements of ordinances, general
conditions of approval; or Department policies must be specifically approved in other
conditions, or ordinance requirements are modified to those shown on the tentative
map upon approval by the Advisory agency.
I� The distances from the proposed lot/parcel lines to the buildings which are to remain
must be shown. If such distances will create nonconforming conditions under Building
Code Chapters 5, 18, 19 and 21 or Zoning Ordinance requirements, such lot/parcel
lines shall be relocated or the non -complying conditions of the buildings shall be
corrected prior to the division of land.
j� The relationship of existing buildings/sewage disposal component to the new lot/
parcel lines will create conditions that do not comply with the Building Code/Plumb-
ing Code/Zoning Ordinance. These non -complying conditions shall be corrected or the
lot/parcel lines relocated prior to the division of land.
Easements are tentatively required, subject to review by the Director of Public Works
to determine the final locations and requirements.
® Easements shall not be granted or recorded within areas proposed to be granted, dedi-
cated, or offered for dedication for public streets, highways, access rights, build-
ing restriction rights, or other easements until after the final map is filed with
the County Recorder. If easements are granted after the date of tentative approval,
a subordination must be executed by the easement holder prior to the filing of the
final map.
�1 In lieu of establishing the final specific locations of structures.on each lot/parcel
at this time, the owner, at the time of issuance of a grading or building permit,
agrees to develop the property in conformance with the County Code and other ap-
propriate ordinances such as the Building Code, ;Plumbing. Code, Grading Ordinance,
Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code; Zoning Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utili-
ties Ordinance, Water Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Elec-
trical Code, and Fire Code. Improvements and other requirements may be imposed pur-
suant to such codes and ordinances
CJ Prior to final approval, arrangements will be made for the County to accept
as offered on filed in
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND'DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
TRACr/PARM MAP No. 2 0 35 D TENTATIVE MAP DATED
JJ Adjust, relocate, and/or eliminate lot lines, lots, streets, easements, grading,
geotechnical protective devices, and/or physical improvements to comply with ordinan-
ces, policies, and standards in effect at the date the County determined the applica-
tion to be complete all to the satisfaction of this Department.
M Additional Comments/Requirements:
IN
L4 Q
- Name � �, Phone �-5 9 - � S3 Date
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - L DIVISION SECTION
TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO. i.o 3S"$ REV. TENTATIVE MAP DATED 2 - 17 -9) 9
M Thirty days prior to requesting final approval of the tract/parcel map submit gummed
mailing -labels for each tenant in the structure to be converted, a notarized af-
fidavit signed by all of the owners listing all vacant units; a minimum deposit of
twenty -five --($25) dollars for each occupied unit, and recorded copies of all cove-
nants and agreements applicable to this conversion project to the Director of Public
Works. Copies of the covenants and agreements must be mailed to all tenants by the
applicant at least thirty days prior to final approval.
=1 Prior to final approval of the tract/parcel map submit a notarized affidavit to the
Director of Public Works, signed by all owners of record at the time of filing of the
map with the County Recorder, stating that any proposed condominium building has not
been constructed or that all buildings have not been occupied or rented and that said
building will not be occupied or rented until after the filing of- the map with the
County Recorder.
ML All easements existing at the time of final map approval must be accounted for on the
approved tentative map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording
reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in
nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its
location. If all easements have not been accounted for, submit a corrected tentative
map to the Department of Regional Planning for approval.
M Furnish this Department's Street Name Unit with a list of street names acceptable to
the subdivider. These names must not be duplicated within a radius of 20 miles.
El A Mapping and Property Management Division house numbering clearance is required
prior to approval of the final map.
[7 The following note shall be placed on all tract and parcel maps with lot/parcel sizes
of five acres or more: "Further division of this property to lot/parcel sizes below
five acres will require standard improvements be completed as a condition of approv-
al . The improvements will include but not be limited to providing access, installa-
tion of water mains, appurtenances and fire hydrants, and conformance to Los Angeles
County development standards."
p Place standard condominium/residential planned development/commercial planned
development/Landscape Maintenance District notes on the final map to the satisfaction
of the Department.
I� Place standard lease purpose only/division of land for lease purpose only notes on
the final map to the satisfaction of the Department.
CK Label driveways and multiple access strips as "Private Driveway and Fire Lane" and
delineate on the final map to the satisfaction of the Department.
RE If unit filing occurs, reserve reciprocal ingress and egress easements in documents
over the private driveways and delineate on the final map to the satisfaction of the
Department.
CD Place a note on the final map 'to the satisfaction of the Department to convey as a
unit both portions of ownership within lot/parcel. , separated
by , and connect said portions with a standard land hook.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - SL..JIVISION SECTION
TRACT/PARCEL MAP N0. 20 35�V TENTATIVE MAP DATED Z -'( 7- 81
Q Remove existing structures prior to final approval.
E3 Provide proof of access prior to final approval and delineate on the final map.
D Quitclaim or relocate easements running through proposed structures.
(� A final ire�ebparcel map mast be processed through the Director of Public
Works prior to being filed with the County Recorder.
j$1 Prior to submitting the ,Lw¢ parcel map to the Director of Public Works for
his examination pursuant to Sections 66442 and/or 66450 of the Government Code, ob-
tain clearances from all affected Departments and Divisions, including a clearance
from the Subdivision Section of the Land Development Division of this Department for
the following mapping items: mathematical accuracy; survey analysis; and correctness
of certificates, signatures, etc.
If the subdivider intends to file multiple final maps, he must so inform the Advisory
Agency at the time the tentative map is filed. The boundaries of the unit final maps
shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Depart-
ment of Regional Planning.
M Show the remainder of the last legally created parcel as a "Remainder Parcel" on any
final map to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
CD Extend lot/parcel lines to the center of private and future streets.
5Q If signatures of record title interests appear on the final map, a preliminary
guarantee is needed. A final guarantee will be required. If said signatures do not
appear on the final map, a title report/guarantee is needed showing all fee owners
and interest holders and this account must remain open until the final parcel map is
filed with the County Recorder.
C7 Additional Comments/Requirements:
�/ P1
Name /V a4k-, Caeovl Phone 4-51- 4-g S Date
„DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOr 4 (LDDR1)
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION.-ROAD UNIT 40 SCM
7 /PARCEL MAP NO. P ILO. TENTATIVE MAP DATED , �
[ The subdivider shall prepare signing and striping plans for all multi-lane
•streets and highways within or abutting this land division to the satisfac-
-tion of the Department.
[] The centerlines of all local streets shall be! aligned without creating jogs
of less than 150 feet. A one foot jog may be used where a street changes
width from 60 feet to a 58 feet right of way.,
[] The minimum centerline radius is 350 feet on all local streets with 40 feet
between curbs and on all streets where grades exceed 10%.
[] The minimum centerline radius on a local street with an intersecting street
on the concave side should comply with design speeds per Road/Sewer/Water
Section's "Requirements for Street Plans” and sight distances per Caltrans'
current Highway Design Manual.
C] Design local streets to have minimum centerline curve radii which will pro-
vide centerline curves of 100 feet minimum length. Reversing curves need
not exceed a radius of 1,500 feet and any curve need not exceed a radius of
3,000 feet. The length of curve outside of the BCR is used to satisfy the
100 foot minimum requirement.
[] .-Compound curves are preferred over broken-back curves. Broken-back curves
must be separated by a minimum of 200 feet of tangent.
C1 The central angles of the right of way radius returns' shall not differ by
more than 10 degrees on local streets.
[] Provide standard property line return radii of 13 feet at all local street
intersections, including intersection of local streets with General Plan
Highways, and 27 feet where all General Plan Highways intersect, or to the
satisfaction of the Department.
[] Construct drainage improvements and offer easements needed for street
drainage or slopes.
[] Driveways to be abandoned shall be replace with standard curb, gutter, and
sidewalk.
�( Repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement on streets
within or abutting the subdivision.
[] Construct additional pavement on partially improved highways to provide a
striped left -turn lane at entrance street intersection(s),
[] Driveways will not be permitted within 25 feet upstream of any catch basins
when street grades exceed 6%.
C] Construct full width sidewalk at all walk returns.
C] Construct a slough wall outside the street right of way when the height of
slope is greater than five feet above the sidewalk and the sidewalk is adja-
cent to the street right of way.
C] Provide and install street name signs prior to occupancy of building(s).
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WuKKS ._b =`CM LDDR
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION '= ROAD UNIT,
�/PARCEL MAP NO. Z 0 3SS TENTATIVE MAP DATED 1
[] Make an offer of future right of way feet from centerline on
Make
an
offer
of
future
right
of
way
feet
from
centerline
on
Make
an
offer
of
future
right
of
way
feet
from
centerline
on
Make an offer of future right of way feet from centerline on
[] Dedicate slope easements feet wide on
Dedicate slope easements feet wide on
Dedicate slope easements feet wide on
Dedicate slope easements feet wide on
C7 Dedicate slope easements to the satisfaction of the Department of Public
Works on �
Dedicate the right to restrict vehicular access on _d//
C] Dedicate vehicular access rights on unless the
Department of Regional Planning requires the construction of a wall. In
such cases, complete access rights shall be dedicated.
C] Construct curb and gutter feet from centerline on
Construct curb and gutter feet from centerline on
C3 Construct wheelchair ramp at the intersection of
and
C] Construct base and pavement on
C] Construct drainage facilities on
C7 Construct sidewalks on
t] Construct grading and drainage facilities on
[] Street lights are/are not required on
to the satisfaction of the Department. Contact Street Lighting ection,
(818) 458-5926.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK. (LDDR4)
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION -ROAD UNIT ' Z _H -b 3
W. A/v sCM ,� . t8- s8
i /PARCEL MAP NO.203,5$ TENTATIVE MAP DATED 18•..$.1..B$
C] Construct inverted shoulder pavement feet (lane width) and feet
(shoulder. width) on
Construct inverted shoulder pavement feet (lane width) and feet
(shoulder width) on
Construct inverted shoulder pavement feet (lane width) and feet
(shoulder width) on
Construct inverted shoulder pavement feet. (lane width) and feet
(shoulder width) on
U Plant street trees on
13 Construct curb, gutter, base, pavement, sidewalks and street lights on
[] Permission granted for street grades up to % as shown on map.
[3 Permission granted to vacate .Easements shall be provided for
all utility companies that have faciliFi"es remaining within the vacated area.
[] Prior to final approval, pay the fees established by the Board of
Supervisors for the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District. The applicable,fee is $
per
A traffic study is required to the satisfaction of the Department. C(• iply
with any additional requirements, if any, as a means of mitigating any traf-
fic impacts as identified in the traffic study approved by this Department.
If a Bridge and Thoroughfare District is formed and if signals identified
in the study are included as facilities specifically identified for inclus-
ion in that approved District, then the amount and eligibility for a credit
against your District obligation may be given if approved by the Department
of Public Works.
IS Comments/Additiona'/lRequirements: 6. a6a3c
// k /-8i.leW meW,*a,!
7lram Kt/e v r,'S1a Pri've ri 9h / V/ w a V -
WrivewAV eel -/v Ya!/ey Vila_1>r:ve- - L,ne orc
wag .
14 3. Gorr 1 outh< anti meafares d&i-etTe ai %n
lh alvi G s d� preoare t_ le".- e*4, o 87-SS8 amd dekrm ne.
,'^Dow Par M;3 develoP.ya�V'.Q pro rafa 5/
Dow of "i C-0 S/ /
3Y'�:J l.' f� ko.A • S &. a /"""% .
Name Jim Erpenbach Phone (818) 458-491.0 Date ��•3--8$
d-�-89
DEARn,VIT OF PUBLIC WORKS •'
LAND 'DEVELOPMENT DIVISIONA- .'TTARY SEWER UNIT } Z -/7- 8 9 No SG�I.
PARCEL MAP NO. 903 TENTATIVE MAP DATE
L�
The distances from all sewage disposal components to the proposed lot/parcel lines
must be shown. If any such sewage disposal component is not on the same lot/parcel as
the building it serves, or if it does not meet the horizontal clearance requirement of
the Plumbing Code (Table 11-1), the proposed lot/parcel line shall be relocated to so
provide, -or. a replacement sewage disposal system complying with Plumbing Code require-
ments shall be provided prior to division of land.
The subdivider shall install and dedicate main line sewers and serve each lot/parcel
with. a separate house lateral or have approved and bonded sewer plans on file with the
Department of Public Works.
® The subdivider shall install separate house laterals to serve each building/lot/parcel
in the land division. Installation and dedication of stain line sewers may be neces-
sary to meet this requirement.
iL The subdivider shall submit an area study to the Director of Public Works to determine
whether capacity is available in the sewerage system to be used as, the outlet for the
sewers in this land division. If the system is found to have insufficient capacity,
the problem oust be resolved to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
M The subdivider shall send a print of the land division map to the County Sanitation
District, with a request for annexation. Such annexation trust be assured in writing.
M Sewer reimbursement charges as determined by the Director of Public Works shall be
paid to the County of Los Angeles before the filing; or this land division map.
=] Ordinance frontage ciarges as determined by the Director of Public Works shall be paid
before filing this land..divisior, map.
[7 The subdivider shall determine from the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District where
the connection to the trunk sewer system and disposal facilities of the District shall
be trade, and shall meet the requirements of the Water District for the use of the
sewerage facilities. Acceptance by the District tmtst be assured in writing.
CI Off-site improvements are tentatively required.
AEasements are required, subject to review by the Director of Public Works
to determine the final locations and requirements.
?'ej A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance in accor-
dance Ath Sec;.icn 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance.
I J
The discharge of sewage from this land division into the public sewer•system will not
violate the requirements of the California Regional Wafer Quality Control Board pur-
suant to Division 7 (eottnencing with Section 13000) of the 'dater Code.
M Approved without conditions.
M Co;nnents/Additional Requirements:
I,
WAZ /L-s� �-
4-7-09
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - DRAINAGE AND GRADING SECTION
"%/ 2-17-89
-TRAe+ PARCEL MAP NO. 20 35$ TENTATIVE MAP DATED 1-iov
Q The'property is reasonable free of flood hazard.
[-1 Portions of the property lying in and adjacent to the natural drainage courses
are subject to flood hazard because of tidal/wave
action, overflow, int n ation, and debris flows.
CK Portions of the property are subject to sheet overflow, and ponding -aft+
[Q Drainage plans and necessary support documents to comply with the following
requirements must be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works prior to filing of the final map:
Q Provide drainage facilities to remove the flood hazard and dedicate
and show necessary easements and/or rights of way on the final map.
[Q Place a note of flood hazard (allowed on the following lots/parcels
only) on the final map and delineate the areas subject to
flood hazard. edicate to the County the right to restrict the erec-
tion of buildings in the flood hazard areas.
(Q Show on the final map the County's/Flood Control District's right of
way for A permit will be required for any construc-
tion affecting the right of way or facilities.
Q If a Grant of waiver is allowed, the flood hazard note (and area)
shall be shown on (a plat which is made part of) the waiver.
Q Provide for the proper distribution of drainage.
C[ Show and label all natural drainage courses on lots where a note of
flood hazard is allowed.
[Q No building permits will be issued for lots/parcels subject to flood
hazard until the buildings are adequately protected.
[Q Provide for contributory drainage form adjoining properties.
Q Prior to approval of the final map, the subdivider shall be required to
enter into an agreement with the County to pay to the County,a sum of
for the purpose of contributing to the proposed regional
drainage improvements in the Antelope Valley prior to occupancy or upon
demand of payment by the Director of Public Works. The performance of
said agreement shall be guaranteed by the filing of an appropriate
security authorized by Government Section Code 66499 and approved by the
County.
Q Notify the Sate Department of Fish and Game prior to commencement of work
within any natural drainage course.
Q Contact the Corps of Engineers to determine if 404 permit is required for
any proposed work within the major watercourse.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
- DRAINAGE AND GRADING SECTION
WV
PARCEL MAP NO. Zo3SS TENTATIVE MAP DATED
2-17-49
Q This site is located in zone "A" per the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map.
Upon construction of the storm drain facilities, contact the Planning
Division (818) 458-4322 to obtain procedures for revising the flood
insurance rate map.
[�.A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance
in accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance.
Q Comply with the requirements of the drainage concept approved
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
Approval of this map pertaining to drainage is recommended. Drainage
requirements for this site will be established upon review of the
building permit.
�[ Comments/Additional Requirements: .,,;ll dL
Gyhw Ldv►ne A,.o c L P• A• 14'►r
Q A grading plan must be submitted and approved prior to approval of the
final map.
A preliminary soil report must be submitted prior to approval of the final
map. The report, based upon adequate test borings or excavations, shall
(1) describe any soil or geologic condition(s) which, if not corrected
might lead to structural damage slope failure, and (2) recommend action
likely to prevent structural damage or slope failure. A soil expansion
index test is required and shall be done in -accordance with the procedures
of UBC Std. No. 29-2.
[-J The tentative map shows that proposed slopes will cross lot/parcel lines.
For approval of grading plans, these slope or lot/parcel lines shall be
adjusted so that lot/parcel lines are located at or near the top of the
slopes, along drainage terraces, or at similar locations acceptable for
establishment of slope maintenance responsibilities.
JK A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance
rn accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance.
Q Approval of this map pertaining to grading is recommended.
Q Comments/Additional Requirements:
Name Date Phone (818 ) 458-4921
4 —7-409
DE-PARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LAND -DE`lELMMENT DIVISION - ""TER ORD 11 SUBUNIT � �/0 rem
WC-�/PARCEL MAP NO. TEATATIVE MAP DATED/mO
[3 Provide all materials necessary to substantiate that there is an adequate
water supply and a firm commitment from the water purveyor that the necessary
quanties of water will be available to the proposed development. From the
information available to this office, there are only limited water supplies
available to the area.
64 A water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the
land division must be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of
the _type and location as determined by the Forester and Fire Warden. The
water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total dcmestic and fire flows.
[] Construct the necessary improvements to the existing water system to
accorrmodate the total domestic and fire flows. According to our records, the
water mains serving this proposed land division do not have adequate
capacity.
6� There shall be filed with the Department a statement from the water purveyor ,.
indicating that the water system will be operated by the purveyor and that
under normal operating conditions, the system will meet the requirements for
the land division, and that water service will be provided to each
lot/parcel.
[] This proposed land division is not within the service area of a water
utility. A water utility to provide service to all lots/parcels within the
land division must be forayed and registered.
[
y
? A warmer Utility L irica to oil Registration shall be filed with the
�Cer�
Derart�ment.
C7 A `warning note shall be placed on the final map and/or in the Cr & R's
indicating that the area has a limited ground water supply ar. avatar may nct
be available during periods or severe drought.
[] OTf -site improvem.Ents are tentatively required.
Q Essa:r-leats shall be granted to the County, aunroorlate ac=nc; or entity for
the pur;osz- of ince=-ss, egress, = nstruction and maint_nanc_ or all,
in'rastructur_ ccnS'r�c::.^ fcr th-Is land division to the satisfaction 0. thze
Dr tm,n�.
A deposit is required to review d-Mm.—ants and plans for final reap cleart-nc:
in aecorcancs -with Section of the Subdivision Orrnarce.
C1
Approved Without conditions.
C.'rruiients/additional Requirements:
Name �onr La /�h Phone (SIB) 453-4910 Date H— "' -6
4--7-89
,DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS )
LAND'DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - GEOLOGY AND SOILS SECTION --
TP 'PARCEL MAP N0: 6203Sg TENTATIVE MAP DATED .. 2-(78<j
M The final map must be approved by the Geology mid Soils Section to assure that all
geologic factors have been properly evaluated.
E A grading plan must be approved by the Geology and Soils Section. This grading plan
must be based on a detailed engineering geology report and/or soils engineering report
and must be specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer and show all
recommendations submitted by them. It must also agree with the tentative map and con-
ditions as approved by the Planning Commission. All buttresses over 25 feet high must
be accompanied by calculations.
M A detailed engineering geologic report and soils engineering report must be approved.
O All geologic hazards associated with this proposed development must be eliminated.
C] or delineate a restricted use area approved by the consultant -geologist to the satis-
faction of the Geology and Soils Section and dedicate to the County the right to pro-
hibit the erection of buildings or other structures within the restricted use areas.
M Specific recommendations will be required from the consultant(s) regarding the
suitability for development of all lots/parcels designed essentially as ungraded site
lots. A report will be filed with the State'Real Estate Commissioner indicating that
additional geologic and/or soils engineering studies may be required for ungraded site
lots/parcels by the Geology and Soils Section.
D The subdivider is advised that approval of this division of land is contingent upon
the installation and use of a sewer system.
M The Health Services Department is advised that there is no assurance at this time that
geologic and soil conditions will allow the sustained use of private sewage disposal
on each lot/parcel.
M The Real Estate Commissioner will be advised that, due to adverse geologic conditions
which exist on the land division, a final geologic: report approved by the Geology and
Soils Section will be filed with the Commissioner concurrently with the filing of the
final land division map.
10 A geology and/or soil engineering report may be required prior to approval of building
or grading plans.
D Approved without conditions.
D Comments/Additional Requirements:
Name J"ahes S`1�-if'�C rVer��► Phone Date "
Form 267
. .- •x/86
-4:•s. 4 a• , �y
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISIONS IN tNINCORFORATED AREAS
PARCEL MAP NO. ,203.55
i1ICINITYV1AMaK40 'AL
TENTATIVE MAP DATE 2 �7
[] This property is located within the area described by the Forester and Fire Warden as
Fire Zone 4 and future construction must amply with applicable code requirements.
iF Provide water mains, fire hydrants, and fire flow.; as required by the County Forester
and Fire Warden for all land shown an tt map recorded.
[] If the installation of a fire hydrant is required where grading of natural slopes abut
the hydrant, a retaining wall shall be constructed to insure adequate access to the
hydrant.
[] Brush clearance shall comply with the Los Angeles County Fire Code, Division V,
Section 11.501 thru Sections 11.529.
Fire Department access shall extend to within 150 feet distance of any portion of
structures to be built.
Provide Fire Department approved street signs and building address numbers prior to
occupancy.-
[] Prior to recordation of the final map, application shall be made to the Los Angeles County
Fire Department requesting annexation into the Fire Protection District.
[) Access shall comply with the Los Angeles County Fire Code, Section 10.207 which requires
all weather access. All weather access may require paving.
W' 'Where driveways extend further than 300 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds
suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map.
Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for
Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for
driveways which extend over 150 feet.
The private driveway shall be indicated on the final map as "FIRE LANES" and shall be
maintained in accordance with the Los Angeles County Fire Code Section 10.207.
[] The County Forester and Fire Warden is prohibited by the Subdivision Ordinance from
setting requirements for water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as a condition of
approval for this division of land as presently zoned and submitted.
ne Forester and Fire Warden has no additional requirements for this division of land.
[] There are no additional tire hydrants or Tire ikwr3 rtX4uixt:d f.,r this diviaion of land.
Requirements for fire protection water and access will be determined at time of building
permit issuance.
All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction.
Vehicular access must be provided and maintaine�se`rMceable throughout construction.
[] Additional fire protection systems shall be installed in lieu of suitable access and or
fire protection water.
Conmrants:
Far further information an the above conditions, please contact the County of Los Angeles
Fire Department, Fire Protection Engineering Section, 5823 Rickenbacker Road, C m-erce,
annen r,)i at -ren-.Sint _
Date;
��iitIIr� Cr Mp= SFWICGS ;
FATCELMMNO- o`Rd 3 S u TFIV ",=Hz MP ami. � a`� /7 Q g
Vne I+os AWJ&IM. •�1edD t of Health Services t'eo0 that:
�iitaiy 'se ebrs b� Bar -ma prepcii d Parcel MP Nca►. dt .
�e •s t des ttat danestic water wIU be **plied
�Y •
GMMMMM�upant useYof isdividual arae i�at avails and the will be depa_ .
Angeles Departm�stI of owl servihas no jectian to the. ural �¢
_ • faoposed Parcel MWNo.,_ can condition that:
iA* the private serge disposal. ssyystems will be installed In cmnpliaaoe' ".
with Angeles eles County health Codea� and Building and Safety Codes.
b. 2f,• because of future. cc for any other zeason, it is found
that the requu�sanents of � '' Code cannot be met an any of M
the lots, .the it of Health Services will reaam end .
that 1//���� peaeat be =2nff w the of homes oa
c- �of` the lots ae<y be limitad by the silt! and Vp& of sewage
` at can- legally be instal d.
Domestic water will be supplied by
The installaton and location of private sewage .disposal systems will, be
t�oatiagent an the r *iirementd of the En 161 Geology Division of the
?os Angeles Couaty Department of Pohl is S�ibrks.
The Los Angelp�ty Depart of Health Services 'VM 11
- '—•peanut ti►e • nstalu on of c tw ks with the effluent disd- ar , eq andinto
teepa pi#s or leaching ling io be usect as the method of sewage disposal
on all lots cif Parcel 144P No.
.
We stave been
aa�Pti Works Sane � that
sewers are available
and that their use wilbe orthi
Parcel Mp.
3=vi,c3icwater al bbu�y�ers of t2elofis. �° but Will be developed by the
this report will not necessarily be Applicable to any smaLLler
which may be created by future subdivision of the lots shown tithe
ftntative map wryu- ccnsederation at thin tame.
@Am Los Pirtgeles y ,�rttnestt of Health Serviges
uubast no b �i� to
""'—than ri a 3 of this Paroe' hasMni�t yet be,est`dafpi�a*t : z appy .
sewage disposal
-"r"— �Califc�u�' a taegioctal Wa�l�it�y )salCbnt ol;� tbL �'
•""
Until we
hKMthe ed hemmetbod T.
of sewage disposal, we olialI be taoable
- •* .
the subdivider shall cb�tain 'a. penin and approval,fros the Los Angeles
"— County t>Ii Health Services for the destruction or oonstrus,-tion-
anyD �Mell crr this pr�oQerty In the ascent the well is to be
fputt"red for future use, the well shal.'L be protected from flgodirxj or
contamination or such psott cticn which the Health Officer d tetemniines -to be
IF;
My: ! w LATE: 3-2—Q�Sr