The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/22/2002PLANNIN( FILE COPY COMMISSIUiv AGENDA January 22, 2002 7:00 P.M South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Chairman Steve Nelson Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Joe Ruzicka George Kuo Dan Nolan Steve Tye Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on Nle in the Planning Division of the Dept. of Community & Development Services, located at 21825 E. Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title Ii of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of anytype of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept. of Community & Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or v rl"Wrly ul U[C HUUI[Unum The City of Diamond Bar uses recvcterl nanor and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Conunission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Agendas (909) 396-5676 email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 22, 2002 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Next Resolution No.2002-02 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMM IISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice -Chairman Joe Ruzicka, George Kuo, Dan Nolan, and Steve Tye. 3. 4 5. Q 7. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary.) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1. Minutes of Regular Meeting: January 8, 2002. OLD BUSINESS: None. NEW BUSINESS: None. PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1. Development Review No. 2001-22 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020(A)(1)) is a request to remodel and add approximately 2,410 square feet to an existing 2,265 square feet single family residence with porch, balconies and three car garage. Project Address: 480 Wayside Place (Lot 32, Tract 42585) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 January 22, 2002 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Property Owner: Steven and Debbie Mott 480 Wayside Place Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Jerry Lutjens, Landmark Development 19953 Valley Boulevard Walnut, CA 91789 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(e)(2)(A), the City has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Development Review No. 2001-22 to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: 9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearina dates for future aroiects. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: RESCHEDULED REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, January 24, 2002 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room 21865 E. Copley Drive43 Tuesday, January 29, 2002 — 6:30 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Tuesday, February 5, 2002 — 6:30 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Tuesday, February 12, 2002 — 6:00 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Tuesday, February 12, 2002 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive January 22, 2002 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING 11. ADJOURNMENT: Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, February 14, 2002 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room 21865 E. Copley Drive t A r -, . -' r - MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 2002 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Ruzicka led in the pledge of allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Nelson, Vice Chairman Joe Ruzicka, and Commissioners George Kuo, Dan Nolan and Steve Tye. Also Present: Ann L.ungu, Associate Planner; Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4A Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 11, 2001. VC/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 11, 2001, as corrected. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMD✓IISSIONERS: CON D41SSIONERS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None Kuo, VC/Ruzicka, Chair/Nelson None Nolan Tye JANUARY 8, 2002 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7.1 Development Review No. 2001-21, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2001-12 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020, 22.56, and 22.68) is a request to remodel and add approximately 2,847 square feet to an existing 2,647 square foot single family residence with deck and three car garage. PROJECT ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER: 22205 Steeplechase Lane (Lot 175, Tract 30578) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 John Chang 20430 Yellowbrick Court Diamond Bar, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Arthur Tseng P.O. Box 5245 Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2001-21 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2001-12, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. Arthur Tseng, project designer, indicated he was available to answer questions for the Commission. David Huang, neighbor to the project, said he never had an opportunity to look at the plans and does not know what impact it may have to his property with respect to noise and dust. He does not object to the development concept of the property. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. DSA/Smith explained that there is no grading anticipated for this project. The City's Development Code addresses such issues as construction noise, dust, etc. If Mr. Huang has a problem he should call the City for assistance. 8. 9. JANUARY 8, 2002 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Ruzicka moved, C/Nolan seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2001-21 and Minor Conditional Use Pen -rut 2001-12, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed in the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMIVIISSIONERS:_ Kuo, Nolan, VC/Ruzicka, Chair Nelson None Tye 7.2 Development Code Amendment No. 2001-04 to amend Article IV of Section 22.50.030 of the City's Development Code regarding temporary uses for outdoor display/sales events. PROJECT ADDRESS APPLICANT: Citywide City of Diamond Bar 21825 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this matter to February 12, 2002. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. Upon motion by VC/Ruzicka, seconded by C/Nolan, the public hearing was continued to February 12, 2002, by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Nolan, VC/Ruzicka, Chair Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None A13SENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tye PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: None Offered. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1. Public Hearing dates for future projects — as scheduled. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As scheduled. .S JANUARY 8, 2002 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Nelson adjourned the meeting at 7:27 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Attest: Chairman Steve Nelson AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE: NUMBER: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION 7.1 January 16, 2002 January 22, 2002 Development Review No. 2001-22 Staff Report APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to remodel and add approximately 2,410 square feet to an existing 2,265 square feet single family residence including the deck and three car garage PROPERTY LOCATION: 480 Wayside Place (Lot 32, Tract 42585) PROPERTY OWNER: Steve and Debbie Mott - 480 Wayside Place Diamond Bar, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Jerry Lutjens, Landmark Development 19953 Valley Boulevard Walnut, CA 91789 BACKGROUND: The property owner, Steve and Debbie Mott, and applicant, Jerry Lutjens, Landmark Development, are requesting approval to remodel and add approximately 2,410 square feet to an existing 2,265 square feet single family residence including deck and three -car garage. The project's address is 480 Wayside Place (Lot 32, Tract 42585), Diamond Bar. The parcel is .24 gross acres. It is an irregularly shaped pad at the end of a cul-de-sac. A large flag lot surrounds the subject site on the north and east. The project site is zoned R-1-8,000 for single-family residence. Its General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential (RL), max. 3 du/acre. Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north, south and east is the R-1-8,000 Zone and to the west is the R-1-10,000 Zone. REVIEW AUTHORITY/APPLICATIONS This application requires Development Review by the Planning Commission per the City's Development Code, Section 22.48.020.A(1), which states that Development Review is required for projects involving a building permit for reconstruction and additions to structures which are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of the existing structures on the site. Therefore, the addition of 2,410 square feet to an existing 2,265 square structure applies to the above requirement. The purpose of this review process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Also, to utilize the City's Design Guidelines in conjunction with the City's Development Code to promote development that respects the physical and environmental characteristics of the community and the site. The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 42585, Lot 32, as 24 acres. The original structure was approved in 1986 with 1,314 livable square feet and 448 square feet garage. A 499 square feet room addition was completed in 1993 showing a total of.4 bedrooms. The existing patio covers were also permitted. ANALYSIS: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • Development Standards The following is a comparison of the City's development standards and the project's proposed development standards: City's Development Standards Project's Development Standards 1. Setbacks (main structure): 1. Setbacks (main structure): • Front yard -20' from property line • Front yard- 20 feet from property line* • Side yards -5' & 10' minimum from • Side yards- 10' and 15' from property line property line • Rear yard -20' minimum from property • Rear yard -Irregular line meets Code line requirements • Site Coverage -overall maximum 40% • Site Coverage -Approximately 33.5% 1►% 2. Building Height: 2. Building Height: • Maximum 35' • Maximum 25.25' 3. Parking: 3. Parking:* Minimum two -car garage with each bay Existing two car garage 19'x20' and new minimum 10'x20' one car garage 10.25'x23' and driveway meets requirement "There are a total of six bedrooms plus the potential of the study as a bedroom with a three -car garage and driveway; therefore, staff anticipates adequate parking. The above analysis indicates that the proposed reconstruction/remodel meets Development Code Standards or the minimum Development Code requirements. However, this project challenges the purpose and intent of the City's Design Guidelines by increasing the total project by over 110% and specifically the General Residential Design Guidelines, Site Planning (A)(2), page 33. Staff recognizes these challenges and provides a discussion below. • General Plan/Design Guideline&'Compatibility with Neighborhood The General Plan has two strategies relating to compatibility within the Land Use Element: 1. Strategy, 1.2.4, Maintain residential areas which provide ownership for single family housing and require that new development be compatible with the prevailing character of the surrounding neighborhood; and 2. Strategy, 2.2.1, Requires that new developments be compatible with surrounding land uses. The City's Design Guidelines state that compatibility with adjacent uses is a primary objective. Projects should be designed to minimize negative impacts on surrounding uses. In this case, the proposed project is a single family residence adjacent to other single family homes. In this case, staff is specifically concerned with -the size and scale of this project when compared to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single family residence will have approximately 3,882 square feet of living area (a gross combined area of 4,675 square feet). Whereas, the surrounding homes generally range in size between 1,293 square feet to 2,200 square feet of living area. A few homes have increased their square footage over the range. The homes in the vicinity of Wayside Place including the cul-de-sacs of Darrin Drive, Northview Place, Pikes, Court, Goldpoint Place, Lisa Court and the access road of Armitos Place were built in the 1980's and generally range from 1,305 to 1,499 livable square feet. The largest majority of homes are small one story structures.. There are also variations of one to two story, but there are few of these products for comparison. The following table shows the square footage for the homes on these streets. This compares only the livable square footage from the Assessor and does not include garages, decks, etc. 3 Livable Square Footage Units 1293 to 1604 182 1704 to 1996 2 2045 to 2197 5 2329 1 at 24407 Darrin Drive 2396 1 at 24415 Darrin Drive 2405 3 at 574 Armitos Place, 582 Armitos Place, and 587 Armitos Place 2696 1 at 24301 Damn Drive (see attachment for photos of largest six homes) The proposed project is 3,882 livable square footage not including garages, decks, balconies, and porch. In order to accommodate the number of bedroom desired, a third garage was added and would be required for adequate parking. The proposed project adds the bulk of the second'floor at the streetscape. Though the architect has designed a one to two story look over the living room, that part .of the front elevation is obscured due to the orientation of the lot. The livable square footage of the adjoining properties is 1499 respectively. However, the easterly neighbor has received approval for a remodel of 726 square feet bringing his livable square footage to 2199. A guiding principal for good site planning is that the siting and design of structures and landscaping should ensure that they blend into the terrain and do not dominate the landform as seen from lower elevations. The proposed project is at higher elevations than its northerly neighbors. Although staff feels the applicant has made a good effort at providing a quality finished product and has endeavored to increase the size and maintain the architectural flavor of the surrounding dwellings, staff feels it is necessary to provide further assurances that the front and possibly the rear elevation will not oppose this guiding principal and dwarf the structure on the flag lot and those properties on Wayside Place. Staff recommends the applicant further address the proposed dominating structure by providing a re -designed project with primary changes to the front elevation for the Planning Commission to review. It is anticipated that the project will eliminate square footage. The loft and second laundry room area is approximately 370 square feet and could possibly be eliminated. For consistency to the design of the surrounding neighborhood, the product should be redesigned to possibly maintain a single story over the garages. • Architectural Features and Colors In addition, staff reviewed the proposed single family residence's architectural style, which is Contemporary. These features were emphasized through a good use of materials; including the use of wood trim, stucco, and stucco brick texture to match the existing. Indeed, the use of these materials provides variety and interest. The proposed project's architectural trim and palette are compatible with the architectural style of other homes within the tract. • Floor Plans 4 The proposed single-family structure consists of two -stories. The first -floor of 1,827 square feet includes the two-story open entry/Iloyer, living room, dining room, kitchen, family room, two bathrooms, converted bedroom into a study, bedroom number one, and the new three -car garage. The second floor of 2,055 square feet includes the master bedroom suite with bath, walk in closet and retreat with fireplace; loft laundry #2 and four bedrooms and two baths. SITE WORK The subject reconstruction/remodel is on the existing pad. No grading or retaining walls are anticipated. Should it be necessary to work more than 50 cubic yards of earth, the Public Works Division will) require a grading/drainage plan. LANDSCAPING The landscape/irrigation plan is not included. A condition of approval will require that a preliminary landscape/irrigation plan be submitted for the front and delineate the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location. The landscaping/irrigation is required to be installed or replaced per the plan prior to the Planning Division's final inspection or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Additionally, it is noted for the applicant that any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback :shall not encroach into the street's dedicated easement; nor, shall any such structure or dense plant material proposed within the front setback exceed a maximum height of 42 inches. PRESERVED/PROTECTED TREES Per Development Code 22.38.060(H), parcels of'h acre or less are exempted from Preserved and Protected Tree regulations. Therefore, the subject parcel at .24 acres is exempt. VIEW IMPACT 4 The terrain in the vicinity of Wayside Place is hilly. The parcels on Wayside Place generally follow the created pad. The homes to the east on Goldpoint Place and Lisa Court are at higher elevations and the homes to the west on Pikes Court are at lower elevations. The neighboring parcels are single-family residences and by maintaining the height limits of the Development Code, the remodel will not impact neighboring properties' view corridors. ADDITIONAL REVIEW The Public Works Division and the Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their comments are included in both the report and the conditions of approval. 4. 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On January 9, 2001, 53 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail. On January 11, 2001, notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e)(2)(A). CONCULSION: Staff completed a review of the proposed project and feels it is necessary to continue this project to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. Enough time should be given to allow plans to be revised for consistency, yet be within the confines of the Permit Streamlining Act. However, should the Applicants choose not to redesign the product, staff recommends denial of the proposed project. The proposed project challenges the City's Design Guidelines, thus making it difficult for staff to recommend an approval for this project. One of the main issues includes the overall massive appearance of the proposed single family residence, which makes it incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. With respect to this application request, the Planning Commission has the option to do the following: 1. Direct staff to continue this project to a future public hearing date in order to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. 2. Direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval with or without conditions. 3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Development Review No. 2001-22 to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. I. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public; as well as, its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been (reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared by: Linda Kay Smith Development Services Assistant ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application; 2. Aerial; 3. Assessor's map; 4. Page 313, City Design Guidelines; 5. Site photos from Applicant; 6. Photos of six largest homes in the area; 7. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, dated January 22, 2002. D: WORD-LINDA/PLANCOMM/PROJECTS/DR 01-22 4.80 WAYSIDE/REPORT DR 01-22... rA COMMM 1 DEVIMOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION le Record Owner J APP cant '4 Name /�� 7Te✓� r rJEggr2r CLAM name first) hue 1A Address [ np GtJ0L"-.t�� PL, tip acl f. 7 ' Phonc(9o9)_,8a0 -2b ,r, a4 q.5 3 t,�i( k✓ b 1 v� Walifai-r CA. Phone") 545 .2_6 7 ,CCC .tl2t_- FPL N r'1-0/-59 Deposit S ReceiptA ip�7 By Date Recd j,2y--p/ Applicant's Agent A' -L- J a-Lst name first) Gr72-7 Phone(9e1) 5zi f3 6Z S.7 NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals vavolved during the processing crf this case. (Atuch a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members ofpartnerships, joint ventures, and dircuors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that lam the caner the herein described pro pury and permit the applicant to felt this request. Signed 1 / Ap —I Date (All record owners) S 4 Certification: 1, the undersigned, hereby eerd'fy under penalty of perjury to the best of knowledge. that the information herein rntddtd is correct m�y Print Name (Applicaht 0A Agent) Signed CI i r �— Date i • 'J (A plicant' or Agent) Location _ W P - Ta . 425A S (Strut address or ct and lot number) Zoning L. C. R it 5 000 Previous Cases Present Use of Site 'Si rJ-C6 F— l� Use applied for r t.o r- 3 z Tr2- ir A -2-5-&S T MA49' - LAAowA arc 0--3 APs.► • 82Y,1 ^ 03 3 • d7Z ' Area devoted to structures 3r �- a a!g frLandscaping/Open space � $� L S� ¢f Project Size ?-05;5-5Q �-(— Lot Coverage 33 • Slo Proposed density--LL--M (Units/Acus) Style of Architecture C-Ai*o�u nlert1'ie� t'�•�ct n Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof LZ Grading --f•= n L) a If Yes, Quantity. cut Fill Import If yva, Quantity Export -.If yea, Quantity OISTAON [i r :�+�`. �" .�� des. r. � "v k. s�• . r- ii y q � '.�. �)> a .++W'•.l \ it +a 3M Ry a t l . rte, • • � 'T � � 'f� y n b - '•� , 'tea rt �) � � ~ r � �' 7l _ 1 � � A. s � .• -moi - '� �.+ ��. � �' r0 a 16 F� w� 1 •fes,} ��y+:�1~� �.`��w.j �''* ST � _ t l � ., , � y[ t 40f}P • ,'?"M� ■moi+. ' ? - { Odo h t 4 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. SITE PLANNING 1) The site layout is very important in creating the character of a project. Many different factors contribute to the formulation of a site plan and should be considered within the design, including the physical, social and psychological needs of the users of the site. Each individual site will have unique elements which may effect the design. 2) Compatibility with adjacent uses is the primary consideration. Projects shall be designed to minimize negative impacts on surrounding uses. A gradual transition between the project and adjacent uses should be achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, window and door placement. .■.M-2_��,� .. lqu-MI•■ y;' :;=: ll - n is P-4 100 3) Dwellings and other improvements should be appropriate in mass and scale to the site on which they are placed. The site and its relationship to other structures, scenic values, climate orientation, and access should be factors in the design and orientation of structures on each site. 4) Building placement should consider the potential for tree and plant growth on the lot. 5) Open space used meaningfully, can reduce the perceived crowdedness, density, and tightness of a project. Open space can also be used as a buffer between neighboring adjacent properties. 33 ty, r•y y her.., y Nr Mott, Steve & Debbie 480 Wayside Place 5 34 �—' `,•, Diamond Bar, CA ; • 4� `.►�� O� P-33 C C� x �• � `mss+ 32 31 r Picture Key c, 11/1 6-e 0 I 2 k k r� El k 6 C 7 Irl, 94801 DARRIN npi\/i= 24407 DARRIN DRIVE 574 ARMITOS PLACE 582 ARMITOS PLACE MIN 24415 DARRIN DRIVE womb" mb6- 587 ARMITOS PLACE r w bit-,Ja acut o,..,f. '4s81 wir ��61+'E b!c of ✓� \ � \ 6Yv w,waiu 1a�a, _ V J �J. a �lillG/OfA' � Y /y `'1Jca �Im 4 � a Y y N . -Y.,,. .DRS:-• EXHIBIT "A„ DR 2001-22 480 WAYSIDE PLACE JANUARY 22, 2002 ism I fit tINTIF l.4ll1 i+ 1 I' i LI ' Jufa�. N -c cwcKS, STY�l S, T!/n< - E MntEA-I�18 i.. M�'n-� a4aM. AS lygL t r• W l4r E..e�M'T ��•.l IQjze- Y 1 . 4 byY CtG✓ +,..,y _.. _. (tp .r. Jef aHouN .raw GlA0.tTY ). ._ Project Meetings Schedule January 22, 2002 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PENDING PROJECTS Case # PM Location (continued) JCC — RICHARD GOULD (Single FamilyResidence) ADR - 2 -n -n- - I s u1N 111 ZTTmwL PROCESSING JMJR DESIGN (Sin le Family Residence) DR 2001-15 AIL 1194 CHISHOLM TRAIL APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LITTLE, ROBERT (Second Unit Addition) MCUP 2000-9(1) LKS 2102 ROCKY VIEW APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MERICOM (Cell Site) MCUP 2001-11 AJL 21725 GATEWAY APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOVAK & ASSOCIATES (Co -location Cell Site) CUP 2000-09 LDM 1155 S. DIAMOND BAR BL. APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - W AI TING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION S & W DEVELOPMENT Sin le Family Residence) DR 2001-18 LDM/ 22509 RIDGELINE ROAD APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION LKS — WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION S & W DEVELOPMENT (RemodeURoom Addition) DR 2001-23 MCUP 2001-13 LKS 22245 STEEPLECHASE APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — MV 2001-18 WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT GPA 2001-01 JDS DIAMOND CREST LANE PROCESSING Land Use Designation Change DIAMOND BAR BL (Site D) Planning Area -4 to Specific Plan Public Facilities to Specific Plan 2760 STEEPLECHASE WANG, GARY (Si n le Famil Residence) DR 2001-16 TP 2001-02 LKS APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATIOE— WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WESTWOOD DESIGN (1,600 sq. ft. addition0 DR 2001-19 AJL 23646 PROSPECT VALLEY APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION MV 2001-16 WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION XM SATELLITE RADIO, INC. (Co -location Cell Site — DB High School) CUP 2000-10 LDM 21400 PATHFINDER APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Meetings Schedule January 22, 2002 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION Case # PM Location PC CC CC PC CC PC CC PROJECTS ADR 299-15(1) LKS 2676 STEEPLECHASE 1/22/02 1/29/02 2/5/02 2/12/02 2/19/02 2/22/02 3/5/02 LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT DR 2001-22 LKS 480 WAYSIDE PLACE PH (Computer Cafes) (2,410 Square Feet Addition) MCUP 2001-10 LKS 20627 GOLDEN SPRINGS PH 2492 INDIAN CREEK APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — (Demolish and rebuild Single Family TP 2002-01 CINGULAR/T'HE CONSULTING CUP 2001-04 AJL 2151 DIAMOND BAR BLVD Cont. GROUP MCUP 2001-14 LKS 2883 WATER COURSE PH (Cell Site — St Dennis Church) DEVELOPMENT CODE DCA 2001-04 AJL CITYWIDE PH AMENDMENT: (Temporary uses for outdoor display/sales events) ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS Case # PM Location DCM ATLAN STAR/DIAMOND STAR DCM AJL DCM PROCESSING PLAZA HORIZON PACIFIC ADR 299-15(1) LKS 2676 STEEPLECHASE PH DEVELOPMENT CODE DCA 2002-01 (Tree Removal) TP 2001-03 PROCESSING AMENDMENT (Computer Cafes) PARK, BOO SANG MCUP 2001-10 LKS 20627 GOLDEN SPRINGS PH 2492 INDIAN CREEK APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — (Demolish and rebuild Single Family TP 2002-01 Sale of Alcohol Residence w/tree removal) JCC — RICHARD GOULD MCUP 2001-14 LKS 2883 WATER COURSE PH (2 Story Gym with 1st Story Patio & garage) PENDING PROJECTS Case # PM Location ATLAN STAR/DIAMOND STAR CSP 2001-01 AJL 20855 GOLDEN SPRINGS PROCESSING PLAZA (Sign) DEVELOPMENT CODE DCA 2002-01 AJL CITYWIDE PROCESSING AMENDMENT (Computer Cafes) HUANG, FEUSAN YAO INTL DR 2002-01 AIL 2492 INDIAN CREEK APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — (Demolish and rebuild Single Family TP 2002-01 WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Residence w/tree removal) LEGEND PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NON PUBLIC HEARING kla ,h_ tf�•" eL T�f o z. Vq .5 • f 4xr:. .X- n �' T� i i J [k —�1 CD qi ltd � � .xr f a a�'a.V.' { x ,�• 9[ S n e�y 6 I�z e t •e.. d�``. Ij fir Pi d a •� '�� +4 r >t s'* 3W as +"' � ��,•'�. .vd � a +�� 4C �? �� , mow, r ''�' � � � 'st � r • � ��, .3 p �..t�! ,.3 c6PIf sj , � �,�¢�-... � i .'¢ 7 ` i eY �-.,��`j�" a�2+ ! I M 4" q .�f /• a � I •� � P. {'•'�. ..I t �� ;� � .� , .��, .� � ' . ,� •� E " �I i t l t � � b � IIP .. rr»r T3t• i` �. 1 atw .; 4<.'a + .�'' 1 7a.., ....,✓. .. a � � _ _ � tl �q, AL 1 { � 1 ]] y, �,'��. "`ACV. •� f p ff ,.:,+;. y, �I{. ! .._.., ' .'. - � t ----� s'r' !t!!1 _ .1 ��`t ��--;•��a4.. itl.'s e•1 4 r Wi "If 9'°• g 1 .i rx W 0°, a ti N N o� CD o l7d o 8nncn O EL 0 0 - °' CD CD C7 .0 Q w CD �0 CD d°� ar� ND° per, CD 0 CD N UC C tm p O NO Z n A (:d rt V1 • o o y P o o cn CD d CD K t�D N 0 ¢ o ti d � (i �° o z ° CD N N x b N'�. rD CD M CDM CDd ° a' c`D o CD nn CD CD = 3 N O~ m C C O .°* < L O CD v�o c�D � w