Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/08/2017 PC AgendaPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA August 8, 2017 7:00 P.M. City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chairperson Vice Chairperson Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Raymond Wolfe Ken Mok Naila Barlas Frank Farago Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. P/c, ,c rAfrnin frnm .gmnkinn nntinn nr drinking in the Windmill Community Room The Citv of Diamond Bar uses paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the contact information below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded and duplicate recordings are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, CDs of Meetings (909) 839-7030 Email: infopdiamondbarca.gov Website: www.diamondbarca.gov CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 8, 2017 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Next Resolution No. 2017-19 ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Frank Farago, Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke, Vice Chairperson Ken Mok, Chairperson Raymond Wolfe 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCEIPUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voiuntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: July 25, 2017 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. PL2017-45 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Philip Chan, and property owners, Stanley Chan and Yuen Kiu Choi, are requesting Development Review approval to construct a 988 square -foot addition and 157 square -foot balcony extension to an existing 2,205 square -foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 482 square -foot garage and 331 square -foot porch/balcony area on a 0.26 acre (11,166 square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. AUGUST 8, 2017 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Project Address: 1617 Acacia Hill Road Property Owner: Stanley Chan and Yen Kiu Choi 1617 Acacia Hill Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Phillip Chan 68 Genoa Street, Unit B Arcadia, CA 91007 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2017-45, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.2 Development Review No. PL2017-41 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Fariba Shantiyai, and property owner, Joyce Chen, are requesting Development Review approval to convert an existing 1,060 square foot garage into livable space and construct a 900 square - foot addition, 863 square -foot garage, and 538 square feet of deck and patio area to an existing 4,844 square -foot single-family residence on a 1.04 gross acre (45,302 gross square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. Project Address: 2522 Steeplechase Lane Property Owner: Joyce Chen 2522 Steeplechase Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Fariba Shantiyai 3670 W. Temple Ave. Suite 193 Pomona, CA 91765 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. AUGUST 8, 2017 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2017-41, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.3 Develoament Review. Conditional Use Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program — Planning Case No. PL 2016-161 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48, 22.58, and 22.36.060, the applicant, Jessica Steiner, and property owner, McDonald's Corporation, are requesting Planning Commission approval of the following land use applications: Development Review (architectural and site plan design review of the proposed site improvements). The key components of the Development Review application and plans are as listed below: Demolition of an existing 2,489 square -foot McDonald's fast food restaurant building and the construction of a new 3,746 square -foot building. Renovation of the parking lot, including resurfacing and striping, new lighting, landscaping and accessibility upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 2. Conditional Use Permit. The applicant requests CUP approval to establish dual drive-thru service lanes for the proposed fast food restaurant. Comprehensive Sign Program. The applicant is required to establish design criteria for all new exterior on -premise signage. The applicant has thus submitted a proposed Comprehensive Sign Program as part of the overall project. The subject property consists of approximately 0.69 gross acres, on the southwest corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Gentle Springs Drive. The subject property is zoned C-3 (Regional Commercial) with an underlying General Plan Designation of General Commercial. Project Address: 205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd Property Owner: Lorraine Fortelka, McDonald's Corporation One McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60523 Applicant: Jessica Steiner, Bickel Group Architecture 3600 Birch Street, Suite 120 Newport Beach, 92660 AUGUST 8, 2017 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION E E W11 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15302(b) (replacement or reconstruction) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2017-41, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING:. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: 11. ADJOURNMENT: Thursday, August 24, 2017, 7:00 pm Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Tuesday, August 15, 2017 — 6:30 pm South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21825 Copley Drive Tuesday, August 22, 2017, 7:00 pm Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Thursday, August 10, 2017, 7:00 pm Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 25, 2017 CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Wolfe called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chair Mok led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Naila Barlas, Frank Farago, Vice Chairperson Ken Mok, and Chairperson Raymond Wolfe Absent: Commissioner Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke was excused. Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; May Nakajima, Associate Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 27, 2017: C/Farago moved, VC/Mok seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 27, 2017, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Farago, VC/Mok, Chair/Wolfe NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mahlke 4.2 Public Convenience or Necessity Finding No. PL2017-39 — Make a finding for a 'Type 20" (Off -Sale Beer and Wine) license for Sprouts Farmers Market located at 239 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 2 [ t n , v' PLANNING COMMISSION C/Barlas moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Public Convenience or Necessity Finding No. PL2017-39. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS H VA NEW BUSINESS: COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS None None PUBLIC HEARING(S): Barlas, Farago, VC/Mok, Chair/Wolfe None Mahlke 7.1 Development Review No. PL2017-11 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and property owner requested Development Review approval to construct a 1,372 square foot addition and a 71 square foot balcony to an existing 1,881 square foot single family residence on a 0.16 gross acre (6,899 gross square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Low/Medium Density Residential (RLM) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 23303 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Sai A. Myint 23303 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 George V. Wong 516 N. Moore Avenue ##E Monterey Park, CA 91754 Chair/Wolf waived reading of staff's report and staff's recommendation for Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2017-11, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed in the Resolution. Chair/Wolfe opened the public hearing. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 3 �r r ';PLANNING COMMISSION George Wong, applicant, proposed the addition of a 71 square foot balcony to an existing 1,881 square foot residence. Chair/Wolfe closed the public hearing. VC/Mok commented on the enhanced view the addition will provide. C/Farago moved, VC/Mok seconded to approve Development Review No. PL2017-11, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Farago, VC/Mok Chair//Wolfe NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mahlke 7.2 General Plan Amendment Zone Change and Development Review No. PL2015-253 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.70, the applicant and property owner requested a General Plan Amendment to modify the existing General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential (RM) to Low Density Residential (RL); a Zone Change to modify the existing zoning district from Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) to Low Density Residential (RL); and, approval of Development Review application to construct a new 3,932 square foot, three-story single family residence measuring approximately 31 feet high on an 11,225 square foot (0.26 acre) undeveloped vacant lot. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1111 N. Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: James Chin Chou 1359 Bentley Court West Covina, A 91791 APPLICANT: JWL Associates 1221 S. Hacienda Boulevard Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 CDD/Gubman stated that for this item, the Planning Commission is serving as an advisory body to the City Council meaning that, instead of making the final decision to approve or deny the request, when acting in an advisory capacity, the Commission is making a recommendation to the City Council JULY 25, 2017 PAGE�4 " "" �' PLANNING COMMISSION whether to approve or deny, and the City Council is the final decision- making body. The Planning Commission is being asked to forward two key recommendations to the City Council, the first being on how to resolve an existing inconsistency between the project site's General Plan designation and its zoning designation. Currently, the project has a Residential General Plan designation, whereas, the zoning which is intended to implement that General Plan, has a Commercial designation. That inconsistency cannot remain in place so the Commission will review this item and determine whether the zoning needs to be consistent with the General Plan, or if the General Plan designation should be amended to reflect what the zoning designation is. The second recommendation that will be forwarded to the City Council will be based on its review of the actual project proposed, which is a three-story single family residence, and to determine whether or not the project design is appropriate based on the Development Review Findings that are set forth in Section 22.48.040 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. SP/Lee presented staff's report and acknowledged receipt of written communications and attachments on this item from the following individuals: Photo submitted by Ms. Debra Long; Douglas Barcon; Gregory Fulton, 1165 Flintlock Road; An unnamed "deeply concerned Diamond Bar Citizen'; Sally Guillen, 941 Reno Ridge Lane; and Lee Paulson Staff recommended Planning Commission adoption of Resolutions recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Development Review No. PL2015-253, based on the findings of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48.040 and 22.70.050, subject to conditions of approval therein. Chair/VVolfe asked if it was a correct assumption that the drainage easement is not developable to which SP/Lee responded that Chair/VVolfe's assumption was correct. Chair/VVolfe asked if the parcel was the only developable parcel in this area and SP/Lee said that Chair/VVolfe was correct. C/Farago asked the average height of structures within the adjacent neighborhoods (townhomes and houses). SP/Lee responded that the townhomes are one and two-story floor plans and the single family homes along Flintlock are one and two-story units. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 5 `� j PL1ANNING COMMISSION Chair/Wolfe opened the public hearing. Peter Wang, Engineer and Architect for the proposed project, stated that the project commenced in about 2008/09 at which time they were trying to build an office building because the site was designated C-1 and because there is a General Plan conflict for medium density residential. During the neighborhood meeting they realized there was a difficulty in accommodating a commercial designation due to traffic and speed on Diamond Bar Boulevard. After his firm received input from the neighbors, he went back to the owner and recommended that they first resolve the conflict between the General Plan and zoning. He believes that the proposal before the Commission this evening will downgrade the General Plan and zoning to the bare minimum which is Low Density Residential. Further, he believes that the downgrade will also provide conformity with the neighborhood. The reason that they decided to use the contemporary Japanese style was the architectural structure can bring a very soothing and comfortable Zen kind of feeling. The design was inspired by the movie Life as a House so that people driving the SR57 can see a bit of light shining. The architecture brings out the lighting with most of the windows facing the freeway which will give the feeling of a "pearl" in that area. Also, when one is doing Asian architecture the roofline is staggered, which was the inspiration for the design. In terms of the view, the overall'height the top of the roof is still way below the ground of the adjacent neighborhood. In other words, the eyesight is higher than the top of the roof. The upper right portion is a duplicate of a famous Japanese Temple which overlooks the canyon and the valley and again on the right hand side, at night there will be a little light in the sky. Every time he drives the SR57 he imagines this house and sees the light shining and in the morning he sees the Cherry tree in front of the Oriental type of structure which gives it a special feeling. He believes they are trying their best to build their piece on this property. It is not easy to design for this odd shaped property because of the front and rear setbacks which cut down the small triangle upon which they can build. He very much appreciates working with SP/Lee who displayed such patience with them because it was difficult to design for that piece of property. He can build any type of style to make money but he does not believe the owner wants a house to sell because he emphasized that he wanted something built to symbolize a place that can be appreciated. Each floor area will have a lot of open space and everything they have designed was designed to be remarkable and be a landmark in the area. They understand that many residents would like to see that piece of property remain vacant and he does not object to their wishes, but he believes that the land owner has a right to develop that piece of property according to what is legal and permissible. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION They hope by downgrading the zoning and making sure that peoples' views are not blocked due to height and elevation that the project would be meet approval with the neighboring community. The rendering is somewhat exaggerated because they cannot put three dimensional objects in a two dimensional picture so there is an offset. Again, he really appreciates CDD/Gubman and SP/Lee spending so much time with them and SP/Lee displays a lot of patience guiding him through the process even when he feels frustrated. He thanked the Commission forgiving him the opportunity to speak and hoped he could see his design implemented and materialize. VC/Mok said he appreciated Chair/Wolfe's concern about whether the drainage easement was developable. He asked if in the future there could be a change in that and CDD/Gubman said he believed the likelihood was remote. That is a detention basin which is accepting runoff from all of the upstream properties and it needs to have the capacity to accept storm water from a hundred -year flood event should that occur, which in his opinion, makes it crucial for the drainage structure to remain where it is. VC/Mok asked if the owner was present and Mr. Wang responded that he was not. VC/Mok asked for confirmation that the property line ends at the top of the slope and Mr. Wang confirmed that was true. VC/Mok said he asked that question because normally, when an applicant wants to build a three-level house they would generally put the lower level below -grade and the second and third above. VC/Mok said it is nice to know that the engineer kept three levels below what the standard is. He noticed that there was no gate in the driveway and wondered if there was a plan to do that in the future. Mr. Wang said that even if they wanted to build a gate it would have to be set back at least 20 feet. However, at this time there is no plan to install a gate in the driveway. VC/Mok said the reason he asked if because in the event a utility truck needed to access the property or a huge refuse truck needed to come in to pick up the bins he wondered if they would be driving into the driveway into the spot between the two extra spaces and the two -car garage and whether it would be able to fit and make a three-point turn and Mr. Wang responded that it definitely would accommodate those types of vehicles and turns because there is a huge backup space in front of the garage and two designated guest parking spots. The hardscape would actually accommodate three to four guest parking spots. VC/Mok asked how many cars would fit in the open space between the two areas and Mr. Wang responded at least seven cars. VC/Mok said he asked that question because there is no parking on Diamond Bar Boulevard and in the event the owner had a big party it could accommodate only a certain JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION number of cars and he wondered where other guests would park their cars. Mr. Wang said the owner would most likely come up with a solution for accommodating his guests. C/Barlas asked why the owner wanted three stories because most of the homes in the area are two-story. Mr. Wang said the reason is architecture. The third floor is only 600 square feet and emphasizes the architectural style. With Asian architecture the eaves extend out and the roofline is staggered. One does not see the first floor. Facing the freeway and Diamond Bar Boulevard the second floor has a lot of windows and the third floor also has a lot of windows which will show the lighting toward the freeway at night. The lighting will be behind the trees so that it is not overwhelming. C/Farago said he was concerned about the massing and asked if there was any consideration given to putting the 600 square feet (third floor) below or at ground level. The design intent was to create a monument which he believes is directly opposed to what the community and residents in the area would like to see. He believes the third level really creates a monument type feel. Was there consideration to reducing the structure to two levels? Mr. Wang said there are really only two stories and the upper portion is meant only to convey a Pagoda type of feeling. He does not believe there is room to extend the first or second floor because of the lot restrictions. If the only choice is to eliminate the third floor, the lights will not be seen from the freeway. C/Farago said his concern gets to consistency with other homes in the neighborhood. Mr. Wang said he and the owner did not intend to build the same style as other homes in the neighborhood because this home and property would be away from any neighborhood. He does not really see that conformity has anything to do with his project because it is far away from other properties. As an architect, they have their wish and passion and this home was designed to be a standalone symbol. It was not designed to be a home to sell. He can design any type of home the Commissioners wish but he would hope that the Commissioners be open minded about this being an architectural creation. Susan Mullins, 1123 Flintlock Road said she was deeply concerned and dismayed about this project. This man knew when he purchased this property that it would impact everyone behind him and everyone near and dear to Diamond Bar. To the right of Diamond Bar Boulevard as one comes down the hill from Temple Avenue, there is one of the most beautiful expanses of land and scenery that Diamond Bar or any community in the area has to offer. The view is exquisite and it has been there for thousands and thousands of years for people to enjoy. Many people who bought r' rr JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION property on the hill overlooking this view paid more for their property as a result. The people who purchased this property intended to make money when they sold the property. The cost of the structure is entirely too dear. Three stories is not a house, it is a mansion (4,000 square feet) and it is directly in the view of surrounding residences. The site is in the neighborhood and he isn't just taking "a" view, he (the property owner) is taking "our" view that residents have had for many years. People who drive down Diamond Bar Boulevard from Temple Avenue have a small window of opportunity to look to their right and see the current, beautiful expanse which is important to the area, but with the structure, that opportunity is lost. Her other concern is the traffic problem on Diamond Bar Boulevard. The staff report says it is not impactful which is an inconsistency because in fact, it is very impactful — not just to families on the hill but to all visitors, people who live in Diamond Bar and to the expanse which is the only such expanse in north Diamond Bar. The report says there is no impact on the habitat. Ms. Mullins assured the Commission that when Chou leveled the property he eliminated a quarter acre of brush that housed skunks, raccoons, possums and squirrels who had burrows with babies in them he plowed over which destroyed the habitats. Even a one-story house would impact this neighborhood, this area, this view and this expanse. A three-story house is unthinkable. This project will impact people spiritually, emotionally, physically and financially and she hopes that the Commission is sensitive to these issues during its deliberation. Donna Earnhardt, 23379 Golden Springs Drive, said she comes with her Feng Shui upset at the prospect of this "mansion being put on a drive that she has so appreciated for years in Diamond Bar. The General Plan contains an update from 2013 that declares "there is a need to protect the character of existing neighborhoods from incompatible land uses." And she wondered what this means and how it is implemented if the City allows zone changes to accommodate a project of this magnitude. Mansionization is becoming an issue and it has a negative impact on communities. It can reduce property values by $504100,000. Some well-known Real Estate Agencies say that the ultimate impact of out -of -scale housing built by speculation causes "affluent blight" and she wonders why anyone would consider building on this particular parcel. As a result, she researched the matter and found that in 2013, the owner requested a General Plan and Zone Change and that was appealed. It appears that zone changes serve to benefit the applicant and not the community in general and she wondered why the City would allow this consideration. Is the Planning Department favoring developers at the expense of the residents who live in Diamond Bar and support the community? The cities of Los Angeles and Arcadia recently established anti-mansionization ordinances in April 2017 and she JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION wondered if Diamond Bar would be interested in doing the same. If not, why not? Does Diamond Bar recognize economic and land use damage that mansionization causes to communities? What is Diamond Bar's present position on the matter? And she is curious to know how much it costs to achieve a General Plan Amendment or a Zone Change and who pays for it, the developer or the City's taxpayers? Realtors have told her that the City has a pretty high percentage of vacant and non -owner occupied luxury housing which are offered for short term rentals and those are connected with foreign investment companies. Ethical realtors told her they will not engage with investors who engage in growing businesses because of real estate fraud. And all of this has a negative impact on the economy and she wants to know what the City's awareness and attitude about the economic impact of speculative foreign real estate investments are in the City in general. In attempting to determine how much was paid for the land, she tried to determine who owned this parcel prior to 2006 because it shows that it is a Caltrans buffer and in 2007 the present owner appears on a title, deed and history and she wonders how this out -of -place parcel ever got sold in the first place. Robin Smith commended SP/Lee who was so gracious about answering her questions. SP/Lee's patience is immeasurable. This whole project reminds her of her next door neighbor. She had the most beautiful Asian contemporary home next door to her built by the Aihama Building Company (Toshi Aihama, owner). It is a gorgeous 2300 square foot two-story home and she loves it. She lives in a cul-de-sac and can only hope that this project would represent a similar vibe. She is very concerned about this project for a number of reasons. First, it is so large. For example, one thing she found very gracious about Mr. Aihama was that he came to all of his neighbors before he built the house and showed his plans so that all of the neighbors knew what was coming prior to staff getting the plans for the project. She is sure he would welcome anyone to come by and see his home — it is really gorgeous. What is interesting about this house is that it is really a destination and reminds her of the most lavish short-term rental that is perfect for local business clients because it is within 15 minutes of Disneyland and Los Angeles. She and her husband know all of the commute routes and everyone here enjoys being close to everything — the mountains, downtown LA and so forth. And so, it is very troubling to her to think that a house that is so out in the open — exposed in this area is going to be possibly used as a business because personally, she cannot see a family living there in this most beautiful home with the sound of the freeway being so close. It is in a buffer zone near the major boulevard and the 57 freeway. She lives in a hillside home and she looks at this property (the proposed project) and it is located off of Featherwood and that hillside that JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION is next to the 60 freeway has burned in the past. Every time somebody throws a cigarette butt out of the car — she thinks a couple of years ago there was a backfire or a vehicle malfunction that made the entire hillside burn. She showed a view from her backyard and said that the house on the top, the really big giant house, is farther away from the road than this 109 feet and it makes her really nervous because she has lived with watching the very impressive burns of this area — twenty firefighters on the hillside, helicopter, the whole thing. So the fire risk is very galvanizing in her mind. She lives with it because she has an acre hillside home. The other thing is, the geotechnical failure of our Puente formation soil. As the Commission knows, the new 2016 amendment to the October Building Code (Title 15), if you just look in Section 1 it has items 1 through 13 that describe the actual vulnerability and character of Diamond Bar soil. It says the hillsides in Diamond Bar are composed of Puente formation, similar weak geological materials and so forth. And bottom line, when we have the big earthquake we're all going to be in trouble which she thinks about when she reads this thing. So there is that. And then you have the 10 and 57 freeway hill failure that we had in 2010, if you remember, where the whole thing came down. So, she has a very sober, real-world understanding of movable soil because her property is on movable soil as well as, other things when she sees — that's the first thing she thinks is, how is that going to hold up. Just the natural character of the Diamond Bar soil is a problem and the new Building Code update says as much. And while she has all the faith in the world of the Planning Department and they are wonderful professional people. She knows PWD/Liu — he is a master engineer. It just makes her nervous that this strange property — I mean it's this house in this little postage stamp sized parcel where it is going to have runoff and it is going to receive runoff from the neighboring houses. So, it's a safety hazard and the massive windows, she wonders if they are going to cause a glare hazard for the drivers where the 6 o'clock sunset hits the windows. So all of those considerations she hopes the Commission will take into account when considering this particular plan. Victor Bermudez, 1129 Flintlock Road said other residents who spoke covered some of the things he was going to cover. He had a number of letters. He is unable to read all of them but all of the residents on his street who face Diamond Bar Boulevard are opposed to this project. While he appreciates Japanese architecture and structures he does not believe that belongs in this location. They are looking to build a monument and we don't need a monument in our neighborhood. It could be a distraction on the freeway, it causes accidents with people looking up. If they see shiny lights and are looking up and not paying attention it is going to cause accidents on the freeway. Was a geological survey done? As a previous resident JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 11 PLANNING COMMISSION mentioned, it is right there on the edge of the freeway and right on the edge of the hill. The weight of this house is going to put undue stress on that hill. The other thing is, others spoke about mansionization and spot zoning to change one lot when everything else around it is zoned something else shouldn't be done unless it benefits the entire neighborhood. What he didn't hear is that the owner — he never heard anything about them moving in which brings up another concern he has that is this going to be a property that is rented to people from out-of-state. When they show the pictures they just show the house and say look at this beautiful house. You can rent it for whatever amount of dollars and yeah, you're close to Disneyland and everything else, but nobody is really going to know where it is at until they finally get there. If somebody does move in and they have a party, where will people park? They are going to end up parking around his neighborhood because the bowling alley is too far down unless they shuttle people back and forth. People are going to be parking all over our neighborhood to go over to that house. Plus, there is no crosswalk there for people to cross the street which is also unsafe because the speed zone is 50 mph. The other concern he has is their landscaping. When they put the trees up, the trees are going to grow so the trees will eventually grow bigger and bigger and maybe even the trees will end up blocking their view — not to mention the house itself. And looking to the future, let's say they use it for rentals or whatever or say somebody does move in not knowing exactly where it's at. Eventually, somebody is going to not like it or whatever and they are going to move out. I mean, it's too big for the neighborhood so obviously they are not going to be able to sell it for an amount they want to get for it because all of the houses around it are smaller. So then, what happens is this house might end up vacant. If they can't make any money off of it, they can't sell it and they can't do anything with it, what happens? They abandon the house — they walk away. Now squatters, they see this great big place there and they start moving in, nobody knows and the place starts deteriorating, the plants start dying and now we've got an eyesore built there that everybody has to look at facing Diamond Bar Boulevard. He reiterated that everybody on Flintlock is opposed to this house. We don't need a monument and as he can appreciate the structure he thinks the house could be better built somewhere else. Douglas Barcon, N. Rock River Drive, said he is not within 1000 feet of this project but he is familiar with Diamond Bar for the last 30 years and he is constantly driving down Diamond Bar Boulevard from Temple Avenue or the Sunset Crossing area going north toward Temple and so forth, and what he noticed about this when he first thought about it was the fact that this house is going to be out -of -place for the surrounding area and as further investigation proved, basically, by walking up there and shooting some JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION pictures. He emailed a letter and photos to SP/Lee. The one photo he shot which is the southerly looking one is apparently based on optical illusion of sorts. He was under the impression that the driveway that is currently on the site was the driveway for this house. He found out since then that it is not and it turns out that that entryway is also probably the easement to let vehicles down into that drainage area. So they are creating a new driveway further south from that point but the house itself sits about five feet (5') from that chain link fence that divides the drainage area from the new property. But back to the original thing about entering Diamond Bar is that that (house) will jump out at everybody coming into Diamond Bar — when they see that they'll go, what is that thing? And then they will notice it has the foreign look or the Japanese look to it and they'll go, we're not in Diamond Bar are we? And then he took a drive up the 57 (freeway) and realized it is noticeable on the northbound 57 if you look to the right and the southbound you can't miss it and this is going to jump out at people as basically pointed out tonight, a monument or a shrine. And it gives the impression that Diamond Bar is a foreign country of sorts. He doesn't think it is the impression that the Diamond Bar residents want people to have. Most of what he was going to say has already been said tonight by other people and he will cut this as short as possible, really. Cal Poly has got ownership rights currently to Lanterman. They are working on a plan to develop that and it may consist of perhaps 5,000 residences. We're not really sure what the number might be or whether they are not going to get that plan done and it is going to revert back to the state in September. It is hard to say at this point but they had it reviewed, they've got multiple plans. Agriculture may not be one of those plans — we can't tell yet, but from the maps they were showing, perhaps not. The buildings that are currently there are not considered "historic" but it is going to increase the traffic on Highland Valley and Diamond Bar Boulevard so the issue of safety is a concern for this house being there in an area where you have bicycles with the bicycle path there, no parking, refuse trucks, delivery trucks — whatever it may be entering that property potentially causing a traffic hazard. So looking at the prior history and the area from the Diamond Bar information from 2010 is what he found to the.Planning Commission, in regard to the property and so forth, as Robin (Smith) pointed out, the hillsides in Diamond Bar are this Puente formation which are not stable — they are weak materials. So we don't know how well that's going to hold up over time. And then the other thing it looked at for planning is hazards and hazardous materials. Well, this site does pose a hazard to traffic and the other point here is, they are mentioning about significant traffic hazards and so forth. What is considered "significant?" Is that a traffic accident where somebody dies or a traffic accident where somebody is injured? We don't know. And as for the aesthetics part of it, it is also in the Planning Commission reports, this JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION building is highly visible from the 57. It will set the tone for the City of Diamond Bar and basically, that's what he's got for his comments tonight. Everything else is in his report which includes the photos and so forth, so refer back to that and go from there but to him, this is likely a foreign investment that is being done as speculation and people do not know where the money is coming from, but it is perhaps something that needs to be looked at. Felino Bautista, 1141 Flintlock Road, asked staff to display the elevation showing the Diamond Bar hillside of the proposed site and the drop off from the freeway. Using the map, he said he was trying to determine how far it was from the site to the on ramp and off ramp. Living close to a freeway is detrimental to one's health because of the emissions. Granted he saw in the handout that there was some sort of chemical analysis that says there is nothing there. He submitted that is not exactly factual and he would request that the Commissioners review that data and ascertain if it actually meets what the state mandates to buildings close to freeways. He is also a baby boomers and as boomers get older we tend to sell our houses. He has a 2000 square foot house and who is going to buy a 4000 square foot house, because the Millennials aren't. He knows his son cannot afford it and he is 32 or 33 and works for the studios. He knows his kids up in Oakland, their 1200 square foot house cost $675,000 in Piedmont. He cannot see that house (the project house) bought by someone. So, what does that leave you in terms of a revenue stream? How many bedrooms? Four bedrooms? Airbnb right there. So he submits that is an ill -placed house. He referred back to the plans and pointed out what he believed to be the driveway. In 2013 when neighborhood meetings were held the concern was for delivery trucks pulling into a small commercial area. Now we have four bedrooms and say there are three kids and a set of parents which could mean that five or six cars would be kept close to that structure. He felt that it was not well thought out, because he did not believe a DHL truck or an Amazon delivery guy would have room to go in, turn around and to come out of the driveway. As a former engineer, regarding the glare on the windows, there is a structure in Newport Beach that has multiple solar panels and is located on Bayside Drive. When the sun goes down the reflection from those windows can be seen in Balboa which is a good five miles as the crow flies. He submitted with that much glass area the energy bills to cool that will be substantial so who is going to buy it? He suspects the other gentleman that said it is going to be empty for a while is right. Paul Deibel, 23346 Wagon Trail Road, said he originally came this evening to hear about the previous item. But in listening to this item he has concerns he wants to pass on to the Commission. He objects to the General Plan JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 14 PLANNING COMMISSION Amendment to change the land use designation from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. Diamond Bar has a tremendous over supply of low density, single family residential and mansions. What Diamond Bar needs and not just the City but the entire county and state is more affordable housing. This site on the General Plan is designated Medium Density Residential which is a scarce resource in Diamond Bar. He does not know how much vacant Medium Density Residential there is but he would anticipate that it is very little. He questions the consistency of this item with the Housing Element of the General Plan. On a prior case he looked at the Housing Element of the General Plan and all he found was the Housing Element from 1995 which he assumes is out-of-date because he understands a Housing Element was adopted in 2013-14 timeframe and he could not find it on the internet. He called the office and was advised that not only is it not available on the website, but that you have to come to the library and submit a request for "public documents request" and he is not sure he heard that right, exactly, but that is incredible to him that a citizen of Diamond Bar has to put in a government documents request to look at or get a copy of the General Plan. So his first point would be please, put the Housing Element on the website so people can see it and we need to have one in the library if it is not there. He wanted to raise a couple of questions for consideration by the Commission. First, he does not know if the City's General Plan is approved by the Housing Development of the state. He doesn't know that and he didn't have a chance to find out. He assumes that it is, but if not, he believes that is a serious problem, especially if he as a citizen is challenging the consistency of this project with the City's General Plan and the existing designation in the General Plan and changing that designation. Secondly, assuming that the Housing Element is adopted, he is curious how the City is doing with respect to meeting the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) that presumably it has under the General Plan planning process for the region. And with respect back again on this particular site, if this is not a perfect location for Medium Density Residential Housing then he doesn't know where in Diamond Bar would be. You've seen the graphics that show how a larger structure can be very compatibly provided here, very compatibly designed for the neighborhood, and this would be a perfect location for some well-designed affordable housing that would be completely compatible with the neighborhood. The zone change from C-1, yes, normally you change your zoning to match the General Plan. You don't change the General Plan and the zoning. You went through. a General Plan adoption process so he would advocate adhering to the General Plan (land use) designation on this site for Medium Density Residential and he challenges the finding of consistency with the General Plan which this body would have had to make to proceed this far with this case (project) he believes. And by the same token he questions that this JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 15 PLANNING COMMISSION proposal is, in fact, exempt from CEQA because he thinks one could make a case that any change to the General Plan land use designation is significant under CEQA and should at least entail a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact that would look at the housing impact and the consistency of this project eliminating existing Medium Density Residential from your stock of land use in the City. He thinks it is not warranted. John Youssef, 1159 Flintlock Road said that the house in question would directly be in his view of site from his back yard. When they bought their house, one of the biggest reasons they bought it was for the view. We did pay extra, as one other resident mentioned, to get that view and if that house is built, our house value drops significantly. Not only that, there are also privacy issues. They mentioned that they want to build a three-story house which means they can see into his back yard and he can see into their third story, right? So that raises a privacy issue and he is not really okay with that. Also, the architect mentioned he wants to build a "landmark" — is it a landmark or is it a single family residence because landmarks are not the same as single family residences. He mentioned people want to see the light from the freeway and that sounds like a monument or temple to him which can also carry distractions on the freeway and cause accidents like the previous resident spoke about. He also mentioned he wants to plant trees so even if the house doesn't completely block the view, the trees will. Another thing to know, if this was truly important to the owner, why isn't he here speaking his case? And why is he just hearing about this (project) right now? So these are all concerns he has in regards to building this house. Not to mention other people did talk about the safety hazard, traffic, where the driveway is going to be located. There is a bike lane on that side of the street and there is also the bus stop right next to that house. So it does cause a lot of tension and lot of distraction to the people not only driving on Diamond Bar Boulevard but also the people driving on the freeway because of those large windows that may cause the reflection and people are not supposed to drive on the freeway to appreciate the large homes on the hillside — they are driving on the freeway to reach a certain destination they are going to. Mr. Youssef said he understands the owner wants to build something lavish but that is not the area to build it. Diamond Bar, specifically that parcel, is not the area to build it. If you want a large area, if you want a large house, go build it somewhere on the hillside rather than in the middle of a residential street. Also, in question to the parcel, how can we buy the parcel back because regardless of what they want to build on that parcel, every single time these people and he will be here to deny it so how can the City buy the parcel back because whatever it is they decide to build he personally will be against it and he is not sure his fellow residents will be against it, but like he said, he lives on Flintrock Road, his JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 16 PLANNING COMMISSION house value will decrease $50,000 to $100,000 so he is not going to let that happen. Bernice Minnis, 23753 Decorah Road has been living in Diamond Bar since 1974 and she has four questions that can hopefully be answered tonight. 1) Would there be livable space on the third floor? 2) What is the family dimensions (dynamics) — is there a husband, wife, and children and how old are the children that are going to be staying there? If they are under 18 they will be there for a few years. If they are close to 18 they might be moving. That is a great big house for just a mom and dad left behind so that's very important to her. 3) How long will the family be living in this house before they move out? Are they planning to just be there long enough to see their children grow up or are they planning on staying a little longer? 4) Will this house be used for another purpose? Reverend O.L. Johnson, 1,135 Flintlock Road quoted from an article "Understanding Spot Zoning written by Robert C. Widner, Attorney at Law who wrote "a zoning decision that merely provides for individual benefit without a relationship to a public benefit cannot be legally supported." Reverend Johnson said that when he thinks about what Mr. Widner is saying, he can see from what has been said that the property owner will definitely benefit, but he is wondering what the benefit will be to the community. He listened to everyone who has spoken and has not heard anything that tells him a benefit to the community will be forthcoming. As was said earlier, he and his wife purchased their home which is directly across the street from the proposed house and as his wife likes to say, it is in their face and it is also in the face of the Bermudez family that lives next door and also in the face of the Batista family that lives next door and it does obstruct their view in spite of what has been heard today. They want to register their opposition to the zoning change and the house although he can see it is a beautiful house, but we are against it for all reasons that have been stated this evening. Clark Minnis said he read about this in the newspaper a few days ago and right away he got suspicious and he is still suspicious. Over 4,000 square feet, four bedrooms — great big rooms, he has a feeling it will be used as a "birthing" home. Big bedrooms with maybe five or six beds in each room. The person that wants to buy the property and build a house is not here. It is something to think about and it would not fit in Diamond Bar. He lives up Sunset Crossing with a nice view. So think about it. It looks rather suspicious to him and he hopes the Commission does not vote for them. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 17'_: PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Wolfe asked the applicant to return to the podium for rebuttal before returning the matter to the Planning Commission. Mr. Wang said he heard a lot of opposition and to solve their concerns he needs to think about how he might be able to do that. However, there was one thing that people talked about that was very offensive to him which was their reference to him and the property owner being "foreigners." Who is the foreigner? Just because his skin is different so definitely he is a foreigner and just because Mr. Chou has a last name of Chou which means he is a foreigner. Mr. Wang said his father worked for the US Navy for 20 years in Taiwan and received immigrant status in the United States when Mr. Wang was 23. Mr. Wang obtained his Master's Degree and served in the United States and LA County Government for 23 years from which he retired. He has taught at Cal State Fullerton for seven years and teaches all American kids. His sons are American. Mr. Chou is a very private person, it is not because he does not want to show up for the meeting. It is because he is a very, very shy person, a very private person, and is not used to public speaking which makes him nervous. For Mr. Wang, what he is trying to build is not a mansion for Diamond Bar because there are many mansions in The Country Estates. Compared to the structures in The Country Estates, this proposed project is a small building. As he stated earlier, this is a very unique piece of property and he wanted the challenge when he took on this job which he has been working on for almost ten years he did so because of its uniqueness in terms of its position and location. He approached the map and said that when the front and back yard setbacks are taken out the proposed location is the only location that can be built upon and the only location where a wide turning radius can be included. If there is enough landscaping he can provide more paved area for the vehicles. There is always anticipation of neighbors' concerns and many times when things are done to Code it is just for the minimum safety and conformance. In this case, he is attempting to conform to every possible standard and building a single family frame house is based on the recommendation by the residents at the neighborhood meeting. Now they do not think that is good so we agree and as a result, he downgraded the home to the minimum that can be built to resolve the inconsistency with the General Plan and the zoning. The property is a legal property. It was set and it was there and the owner wants to build on it. Regarding the question about the living space, family size and how long the family will live there and who will use the dwelling he believes that is a matter of privacy which he believes is a matter of the American standard that people respect other people's privacy and keep their privacy as well. This is something he has learned about American culture. Actually, he brings his culture to this continent and he learned a lot and that is what a great part of America is JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 18 PLANNING COMMISSION about because it is multi -cultural. In the 1980s Europe brought an impact to America and he believes the Asian brings an impact to America now which is what a great community and great country is about. Again showing the depiction of the house from the freeway, Mr. Wang said it was exaggerated, but one cannot really see too much of the building because it is far ahead and why they are trying to build this way because there is an attempt to make a comparison in the architecture. Basically, the first floor will not be viewable from the freeway and it will appear as a two-story only. He understands that this is a bit unusual for the neighborhood and it is not cheap to build this type of structure. The glass alone is very expensive and Japanese glass is really not really clear but is more obscure and non - reflective. They want to build this because it is a unique location and does not really touch any nearby neighbor. And why would we waste a visible spot that one can see from the freeway which brings in the uniqueness of that spot. We hope by building this expensive though unique style building we will bring up the surrounding property values. We do not want to lower the property values. This property will be significantly valued to the good because the owner will spend a lot of money to develop it. And we hope that because of its uniqueness and beautiful architecture will bring up the neighborhood property. We believe in the scope of the project which he believes staff and the Commissioners understand. They do not intend to disturb the habitat by having the fire department come in and brush the property. They have spent so many years doing this working on this project for which he has such great passion because it will present a philosophy, culture, uniqueness and beauty to the hillside. He hopes everyone can feel his passion regarding this building and while he is not Frank Lloyd Wright, he hopes people will stop in the area to look at this beautiful building in Diamond Bar. VC/Mok said he appreciated Mr. Wang's passion for this project which is very evident in his words and the way he spoke which he did very eloquently. The packet his firm sent the Commission is very well prepared and even the paper is high quality and expensive. VC/Mok said that while he does not know much about Japanese culture he does know that a lot of Japanese architecture requires pretty bold colors and the packet shows muted colors. He did not read about the owner or architect recommending any particular color palette for this project and wondered if the packet showed the final color palette or would there be something else in mind. Mr. Wang explained that this is contemporary Japanese inference. It is not 100 percent accurate but they are trying to adhere to any recommendation from the Commission because they are trying not to offend anyone and therefore intend to use very simple colors and straight lines. Japanese style is emphasized by natural lighting and natural ventilation. People who live JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 19 PLANNING COMMISSION there will want to mix with natural surroundings and the rendering coincides with the landscaping plan, which includes Japanese maple trees and cherry trees. They want people who drive through to see beautiful architecture and nature and not weeds and grass and as they drive by everyday they can feel soothing and peaceful vibes coming from that building. Chair/Wolfe closed the public hearing. Chair/Wolfe said that regarding the fire risk and the hillside risk and fortunately or unfortunately that is an issue that many in Diamond Bar have to live with as part of living in the quasi -country environment that defines our beautiful community. He understands that risk which is prevalent throughout this community. He is very concerned with the driver expectation in this area. There is another driveway that serves utility vehicles getting in and out of the drainage easement area which is not widely used and has a different use than any other development at this location. In the past the applicant had proposed a small commercial building and a commercial building would obviously have much heavier traffic impacts as would a potential multiple family housing unit if it could be fit to the area that would have any real value. Even with a Low Density Residential Zone change, he is concerned that as one comes down from Temple Avenue and around that curve when some people may be looking at the viewshed and the new house that may end up being there at the lack of expectation because there hasn't been any vehicular activity exiting and entering Diamond Bar Boulevard in the area of the project. He knows that the traffic study done in 2012 really focused on level -of -service and looked at intersection analysis. He believes the Commission needs to take a look at the matter of more in-line with driver and line -of -site, etc., particularly when considering there will be some plantings fairly close to the driveway that could further impede the visual acuity of people entering and leaving the property as well as, people driving on Diamond Bar Boulevard: He is also concerned that there is a bike lane on that side of the street and he does not know if there is sufficient radius in the driveway area to turn around a FedEx truck or Waste Management truck or anything of that nature. Also, the larger vehicles would concern him as they are entering and exiting Diamond Bar Boulevard to access this property. In his opinion, before the Commission were to proceed with this matter, it would be prudent for the Commission to request via City staff that the applicant perform this analysis so that the Commission has data to support the direction this body may or may not go. His motion would be that the Commission send this back to staff for further analysis. JULY 25, 2017 47 10. PAGE 20 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Mok said he appreciated Chair/Wolfe touching on an important item he mentioned earlier in this meeting which was the ingress/egress of service vehicles within this property which would be a concern of his as well, especially since there is no left -turn pocket heading north on Diamond Bar Boulevard with access into this property. The only traffic would be heading southbound and the speed picks up quite a bit in that direction and for a big refuse truck to negotiate a right turn, pick up the trash and then jockey around in that pad to come out would seem to him to be sort of awkward and ultimately dangerous. Chair/Wolfe moved, VC/Mok seconded, to continue the Public Hearing and direct staff to bring back further traffic analysis. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Farago, VC/Mok Chair//Wolfe NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mahlke Chair/Wolfe thanked everyone for their time, comments and concerns regarding this item. CDD/Gubman explained to the audience that this matter is being continued to a date uncertain. Staff will have to go back and have a traffic analysis prepared and peer reviewed which will take a couple of months. In light of the fact this matter is not being continued to a specific date and staff cannot predict when this matter will come back to the Commission, staff will re - notice when the matter comes back before the Commission which includes posting the property, advertising in the newspaper and mailing notices to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: None STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman notified the Commission that the next Planning Commission meeting will take place on the regularly scheduled meeting date of August 8th with three items on the agenda with two residential additions. The big-ticket item on that agenda will be the tear down and rebuild of the McDonald's at the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Gentle Springs Lane which will add to the construction activity at the Sprouts Center, should the Commission approve that project. JULY 25, 2017 PAGE 21 PLANNING COMMISSION Future meeting items for August 22 include the Commission's review of a proposed Habit Hamburger Grill drive-through restaurant in the Sprouts Center on the side of the entry drive opposite Chipotle and Coffee Bean. Chair/Wolfe said that he would plan to be at the August 8 meeting; however, he will be traveling back that day from northern California and may be delayed. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As posted in the Agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair/Wolfe adjourned the regular meeting at 8:56 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 8th day of August, 2017. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Raymond Wolfe, Chairperson PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 -TEL. (909) 839-7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: SUMMARY: 7.1 August 8, 2017 Development Review No. PL2017-45 1617 Acacia Hill Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8293-023-001) Low Density Residential (RL) Low Density Residential (RL) Stanley Chan and Yuen Kiu Choi 1617 Acacia Hill Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Phillip Chan 68 Genoa St. Unit B Arcadia, CA 91007 The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to construct a 988 square -foot addition and 157 square -foot balcony extension to an existing 2,205 square - foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 482 square -foot garage and 331 square -foot porch/balcony area on a 0.26 acre (11,166 square -foot) lot. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL2017-45, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the south side of Acacia Hill Road, east of Aho Nuevo Drive. The property was developed in 1968 under Los Angeles County standards with a 2,205 square - foot single family residence and 482 square -foot attached garage. There are no protected trees on site. The property is legally described as Lot 1 of Tract No. 23840, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8293-023-001. Project Description The proposed addition is located at the front and rear of the existing residence and consists of the following components: PROJECT SUMMARY (square footage) Living Area Existing 2,205 New 988 Total Living Area 3,193 Attached Garage Existing 482 Total Garage Area 482 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 3,675 Porch/Patio/Balcony Areas Existing Porch 215 Existing Balcony 116 New Balcony 157 Total Porch/Patio Area 468 The existing two-story, split-level home consists of common areas (dining room, living room/loft area, kitchen, and library), a master bedroom suite, two bedrooms, one bathroom, powder room and a two -car garage. The applicant is proposing to add a bedroom and two closets at the front of the house to the lower split-level and a family room, bathroom and wine cellar at the rear of the house to the upper split-level. The balcony extension is located at the front of the house, above the bedroom addition. The height of the existing house is 23'-9". With the addition, the height will remain the same as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. Site and Grading Configuration: The subject property is a pie -shaped lot. The existing house is situated on two pads resulting in the split-level layout. There is an ascending slope along the west side of the property and a descending slope along the east side of the property. The additions are located on the leveled pads. There will be no grading and no site improvements proposed on the property. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The home is a mid-century modern design with large windows, split-level floors, open floor plan, large roof overhangs, earth -toned colors, and a variety of building materials, such as vertical wood siding and smooth stucco. The Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 2 of 8 applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form and preserve the architectural character, but is reinforcing the mid-century aesthetic by updating the colors and materials, such as replacing the vertical wood siding with horizontal wood siding and replacing the garage door with a modern design that includes stained wood and frosted glass panels. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Site Aerial Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 3 of 8 General Plan Designation Zoning District Land Use Site Low Density Residential RL Single Family Residential North Low Density Residential RL Single Family Residential South Low Density Residential RL Single Family Residential East Low Density Residential RL Single Family Residential West Low Density Residential RL Single Family Residential Site Aerial Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 3 of 8 W -00 r. Proposed Front Elevation ANALYSIS Review Authority The proposed project requires a land use approval The analysis that follows provides the basis for Development Review application. Development Review (DBMC Section 22.48) through the Development Review process. staff's recommendation to approve the Additions which are equal to or greater than 50 percent of the existing habitable floor area of all existing structures on site, or substantially change the appearance of an existing residence require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RL zone: Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 5 of 8 .- -.. Y 111MA111:111440 -1 . .. • .. 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Yes 5feet on one side and 5 feet— east side 5 feet— east side ' 10 feet on the other side 14 feet— west side 10 feet— west side Yes 30'-4"— east side 30'-4"— east side • 15 feet 45 feet— west side 35'-1"— west side Yes . - 20 feet 64'-3" 36'-7" Yes • Maximum of 40% 19.6% 29.4% Yes 35 feet 23'-9" 23'-9" Yes 2-car garage 2-car garage 2-car garage Yes Landscaping: Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if new or rehabilitated landscaping of 2,500 square feet or more was being installed or altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion. This requirement is included as a condition of approval. There is a multi -trunk California pepper tree located at the west side of the property that will be removed to accommodate the addition of the family room at the rear of the house. Staff included a condition of approval to plant a 24 -inch box tree within the property to replace the tree that will be removed. There is an existing eucalyptus tree located at the front of the property that is being retained. Existing California Pepper Tree to be Removed Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 6 of 8 Compatibility with Neighborhood The project is located between a one-story home to the west and a two-story home to the east. As stated, the existing house is a split-level home. The project is designed to be compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition at the front of the house is located 38 feet, 4 inches from the front property line, more than the required minimum 20 -foot front setback. The single -story addition located in front of the existing two-story element creates a harmonious visual transition between the street and the two-story element, and the building scale along the street frontage is reduced by introducing a single -story mass in front of a two-story structure. Therefore, the proposed addition will have similar massing and scale as the existing house and will not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: The addition will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks; A gradual transition between the addition and existing residence is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height and window and door placement; Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; The architectural design accentuates simplicity of line and form, and restrained and understated elegance; The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors and materials throughout the proposed addition; The proposed roof type, pitch and materials of the addition match the primary structure; and The proposed balcony is oriented toward a large front yard area. Privacy and Sensitivity to Adjacent Neighbors: Staff reviewed the location of the proposed balcony extension to verify that there will be minimal privacy concerns with the adjacent neighbors. The existing balcony is located at the east side of the front of the house. The balcony extension is proposed over the addition at the front of the house, extending the existing balcony toward the front of the property. The existing two-story house to the east of the subject property is located approximately 15 feet below the finished grade of the subject property. There are no windows on the second floor of the adjacent house facing the subject property. Therefore, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property. Deed Restriction: If the proposed project is approved, the residence will have a total of four bedrooms and three bathrooms. Staff is including a condition of approval requiring a deed restriction to be recorded with the County of Los Angeles which restricts the rental of rooms of other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house. Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 7 of 8 Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On July 27, 2017, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On July 28, 2017, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: Nata (lT. Espi oz Assistant Plann Attachments: Reviewed by: Grace .Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2017 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Color and Materials Board 3. Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations Development Review No. PL 2017-45 Page 8 of 8 Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2017-45 TO CONSTRUCT A 988 SQUARE -FOOT ADDITION AND 157 SQUARE -FOOT BALCONY EXTENSION TO AN EXISTING 2,205 SQUARE - FOOT, TWO-STORY RESIDENCE WITH A 482 SQUARE -FOOT GARAGE AND 331 SQUARE FOOT PORCH/BALCONY AREA ON A 0.26 GROSS ACRE (11,166 GROSS SQUARE -FOOT) LOT AT 1617 ACACIA HILL ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8293-023-001). A. RECITALS The property owners, Stanley Chan and Yuen Kiu Choi, and applicant, Phillip Chan, have filed an application for Development Review No. PL2017-45 application to construct a 988 square -foot addition and 157 square -foot balcony to an existing 2,205 square -foot, two-story single- family residence with an attached 482 square -foot garage and 331 square - foot porch/balcony area located at 1617 Acacia Hill Road, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review application shall be referred to as the "Proposed Addition." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 11,166 gross square feet (0.26 gross acres). It is located in the Low Density Residential (RL) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 1 of Tract No. 23840. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8293-023-001. 4. On July 27, 2017, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On July 28, 2017, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 5. On August 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and The Planning Commission hereby determines the Proposed Addition to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The design and layout of the Proposed Addition to an existing two-story, single-family residence is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and Development Code standards. The proposed addition will maintain existing building form and preserve the architectural style, but will introduce a modern and innovative design by updating the colors and materials of the home. The mass and scale of the addition are proportionate to the existing house and surrounding properties. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The Proposed Addition will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. The addition at the front of the house is located 38'- 4" from the front property line. The balcony extension is proposed over the 2 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX addition, extending the existing balcony toward the front of the property. The existing two-story house to the east of the subject property is located approximately 15 feet below the finished grade of the subject property and there are no windows facing the subject property. Therefore, staff does not find a privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property. The proposed Addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single- family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The property is located between a one-story home to the west and a two- story home to the east. Part of the addition is proposed at the front of the first floor of the house with a balcony extension on the upper level and a portion of the addition is located at the rear of the house. The Proposed Addition is designed to be compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition does not further encroach into the existing front, rear or side setbacks. The proposed addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. The home is a mid-century modern design with large windows, split-level floors, open floor plan, large roof overhangs, earth -toned colors and a variety of building materials such as stucco and vertical wood siding. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form and preserve the architectural style, but is introducing a modern and innovative design by updating the colors and materials, such as replacing the vertical wood siding with horizontal wood siding and replacing the garage door with a modern design that includes stained wood and frosted glass panels. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Before the issuance of any City permits, the Proposed Addition is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the Proposed Addition is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Proposed Addition is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall record, and provide the City with a conformed recorded copy of, a Covenant and Agreement or similar document in a form approved by the City Attorney, which restricts the rental of rooms or other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house, except to the extent otherwise permitted by the Diamond Bar Municipal Code or applicable state or federal law. 4. During building plan check, the applicant shall identify the location of a replacement tree—minimum 24 -inch box—to be planted on the property, and will be verified during final inspection. The Planning Commission shall: Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owners, Stanley Chan and Tuen Kiu Choi, 1617 Acacia Hill Road, and applicant, 68 Genoa St. Unit B, Arcadia, CA 91007. 4 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. in Raymond Wolfe, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: F -Al .i a eo- ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX ,T I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. PL 2017-45 SUBJECT: To construct a 988 square -foot addition and a 157 square -foot balcony extension to an existing 2.205 square -foot, two-story, single-family residence with an attached 425 square -foot garage and 331 square -foot porch/balcony area. PROPERTY Stanley Chan and Yuen Kiu Choi OWNER: 1617 Acacia Hill Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Phillip Chan 68 Genoa St. Unit B Arcadia, CA 91007 LOCATION: 1617 Acacia Hill Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. I. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. PL2017-45 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 6 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL2017-45, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The hours during which construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work are limited to Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., or at any time on Sundays or holidays. 11. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS The approval of Development Review No. PL2017-45 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one- year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. This approval is to construct a 988 square -foot addition and a 157 square -foot balcony extension to an existing 2,205 square -foot, two-story, single-family residence with an attached 482 square -foot garage and 331 square -foot porch/balcony area located at 1617 Acacia Hill Road, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non-compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non- compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and 9 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. II. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion 10 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. B. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. III. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Conditions: 1. At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2016 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code. Plan Check — Items to be addressed prior to plan approval: 3. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 4. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 5. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 6. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining 11 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX wall(s) locations. These plans shall be consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building and Safety Division. 7. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. Permit — Items required prior to building permit issuance: 8. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 9. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 10. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 11. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. Construction — Conditions required during construction: 12. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 13. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred -eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 14. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 15. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 12 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX 16. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 17. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 18. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 19. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 20. Pursuant to California Residential Code (CRC) Section R315, carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms. 21. Drainage patterns shall match the approved grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as -built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as -built grading/drainage plan. 22. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4"/ft with approved and listed water proofing material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42" minimum in height, 4" maximum spacing between rails, and capable of resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 23. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. 24. All plumbing fixtures, including those in existing areas, shall be low -flow models consistent with California Civil Code Section 1101.1 to 1101.8. END 13 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Attachment 2 I, RECEIVE$617 ACACIA HILL ROAD, DIAMOND BAR MAR U a 20V ILLUSTRATION & MATERIAL BOARD JELD-WEN NO GRIDS VINYL COLOR: TO MATCH EXISTING FINISH:TO MATCH EXISTING WOOD SIDING IPET&G SIDING STAINED BROWN 71 ROOF TILE SHINGLE COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING DOOR CONTEMPORARY WOOD DOOR WOOD GRAIN, STAINED BROWN EXTERIOR LIGHTING WAC LIGHTING FOLSOM SERIES WS -W23610 FINISH: BRONZE 99 CEMENT PLASTER SMOOTH FINISH COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING �f1 M1T7 PROPOSED 41 t 41 IIS' �7 Attachment 3 RECEIVED JUL' 2 © 2017 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SINGLE FAMILY HOME 4 ,G':,. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 FLOOR PLANS Y PREPARED BY: PDS STUDIO INC OWNER: DESIGNER: STANLEY CHAN EXISTING �f1 M1T7 PROPOSED 41 t 41 IIS' �7 Attachment 3 RECEIVED JUL' 2 © 2017 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SINGLE FAMILY HOME 1617 ACACIA HILL ROAD DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 FLOOR PLANS PREPARED BY: PDS STUDIO INC OWNER: DESIGNER: STANLEY CHAN PDS STUDIO, Nc. YUEN KIM CHOI LUXURY HOME DESIGNING 626.831.6628 68 GENOA ST. UNIT #8 ARCADIA, CA 91006 W W W.PDS-STU D IO.COM PCI-IAN@PDS-STUD IO.COM (626)524-2901 T� I 2 512 I 6:12 y 2412 N vat — 24:12 N 1 N111'11 6p 5TH" ` ACACIA HILL ROAD 15 os� R REPRESTOMUEN00 _ EXISTING - -- € �/ STREES'. DRUMAY APPROACH TOREMAIN B'WODOEEINE TO PENAIN �\ EXISTING ROOF PLAN `� SCALE: 118"=1r -0'r NOTE: EXISTING ROOF OVERHANG: 30" PROPOSED EAVE LENGTH SHALL MATCH EXISTING CWs'A NATRGRF E EIOPEWI WA)ERPROOFWO IRATCREDOEAI'1EWR0OF TIDER 14LOPEs,O W1CN®1M6 Pp0U p1, -- �WV FRONT PROPERT UNE_ L=102.59 _R=151 '"R '"" I� D=39°13'23 — EX. GARDEN WALL Ni21i ,3 (E)IAN08CAPE AREA 26 50. FROSTING DRINEWAYTO R \y\/ REMAIN \ 'ou � "1YPICAL R00F 11VERIW.V'. )B' \ E% Wppp DATE REWIREOFRON? \�BETBACK'.10' FOREMAN - AIN \ 864(Q�WNAR� CD _ _ g 8E .\\ b ? � GARAGE FF 102835 I )1..1 a. CONCRETE REMAN ARM TO VERTA PNSTORE A(E)2CARGARAGE INEWAD \ (GROUNDFLOORI \ ATISTFLRLOWER IR'TREE SPUTLEVEL W PINE wn,.IN s 1 ANLEY CHAN FUSS 1 wIU WC N YUEN KIM CHOI 68 GENOA AVE, UNIT %i SFCRO TEL: 626.831.6628 ARCALSM CA 91 C06 FOgOS`YS2q£6.2. TEL: 626.524.2901 4C40/ �NORN£�` SCOPEOFWORK: FAR:626:514.8693 qH/(C 8040 REMODEL EXISTING HOME PUBLIC RIGHTOF WAY T� 'Pb � L"IEIE NpOX k 6 yr 4 (E) IANOSCAPEAREA rJ.4 / 3f PAUA -7/ 1GpEWIH 1. REGAN F824.84 -3TO �rvuVuu -]626F ✓ TO REMAIN: Nr 1.PA \ LB iO gEMNN : i b EX WOOD \/ RNTGHEOAAM ..ROOF IAWN ARRA flEMA1N q / yy / m!B I amuse TO VAm. E RAnx. I V FG ENGB.LL . 8293423401 ZONING RL NUMBER OF STORY: 2 TxnsPa WAT41. :L, 16-IlSe TO RE WIN MISFIRE MD PUT /JMORAIRA.E yy / N I J. -THE/ GOOER: iO RE1WN / \ m -,REE \ i.AEPNE �T-R \n CWs'A NATRGRF E EIOPEWI WA)ERPROOFWO IRATCREDOEAI'1EWR0OF TIDER 14LOPEs,O W1CN®1M6 Pp0U p1, -- �WV FRONT PROPERT UNE_ L=102.59 _R=151 '"R '"" I� D=39°13'23 — EX. GARDEN WALL Ni21i ,3 (E)IAN08CAPE AREA 26 50. FROSTING DRINEWAYTO R \y\/ REMAIN \ 'ou � "1YPICAL R00F 11VERIW.V'. )B' \ E% Wppp DATE REWIREOFRON? \�BETBACK'.10' FOREMAN - AIN \ 864(Q�WNAR� CD _ _ g 8E .\\ b ? � GARAGE FF 102835 I )1..1 a. CONCRETE REMAN ARM TO VERTA PNSTORE A(E)2CARGARAGE INEWAD \ (GROUNDFLOORI \ ATISTFLRLOWER IR'TREE SPUTLEVEL W PINE wn,.IN s 1 ANLEY CHAN FUSS 1 wIU WC N YUEN KIM CHOI 68 GENOA AVE, UNIT %i SFCRO TEL: 626.831.6628 ARCALSM CA 91 C06 FOgOS`YS2q£6.2. TEL: 626.524.2901 4C40/ �NORN£�` SCOPEOFWORK: FAR:626:514.8693 qH/(C 8040 REMODEL EXISTING HOME PUBLIC RIGHTOF WAY T� 'Pb � L"IEIE NpOX k 6 yr 4 (E) IANOSCAPEAREA rJ.4 / 3f PAUA -7/ 1GpEWIH 1. REGAN F824.84 -3TO �rvuVuu -]626F ✓ TO REMAIN: Nr 1.PA \ LB iO gEMNN : i b PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" \ R COVERED PORCH / ❑RES . FF u 6y /� 1✓ B'I' iDRF14111 NWGLROOF WERNVp'. YY O EX WOOD \/ \ I� O'A$A IAWN ARRA flEMA1N q / yy / P YIWL EEWE \ S I V _ BOREMAW fff 8293423401 ZONING RL NUMBER OF STORY: 2 \ :L, 16-IlSe TO RE WIN MISFIRE MD PUT \ CONSTRUCTIONTYPE: / \ J. -THE/ GOOER: iO RE1WN / \ m -,REE \ i.AEPNE �T-R \n ^'y . 14 CAUFORNA PLUGIANG GPCI w 1 EEI4 GI I.S. FIRE COOEIGFG) LOWER LEVEL NIIGNFOgNA&IILOIAG GOO, GBCI -'3gly A \ GO AN ..E1':RHLOGLAOUEAVMEx14 GROUNDFLDOR DN. 1"Im Il FF 102444 PEORGOLL5.4PATI; 111RPAPYI EXL)IR.V .IIRXIIgSPACEE: N m \ B EEELO.M., I RA., 11 LIORARYI R,,ER. HA. VA.IOOM O: FF 1029.00 REAFG LLIN E TR`21sT FLOOR WIN. AREA: 1.181 EF XIEPNG LID FLW RLNING AREA: POS SF EXISTINM R4LtANY EKDRROW \ 14] 4F AOORIONAREA AIR SF COVERED FORCH: Els sF GARAGE q0i SF PROITR..."ORNOLNINOAREA iDPEN1IN S•MVDD ` 1. J P FOKE ".LFEIREMC ".LBE TIII TGRERLIx f l 1V.P/ PLAN LEGENDNENAD�IFOR ,a 11 E TO RELWN P .WALL.R... g (GROUND FLUOR) ❑ ❑ vmoB DSLK / EJE.WULTODEMO. AT IST PER UPPER mBEExrEuose t — NEWWO.SiOOWAU- \\ PUT LEVEL MOODDEOK / RWEDAREA9 AREEw Ae0R1.N roeenFEi.�Dv o ro SF.FG.D w / PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" \ R COVERED PORCH / ❑RES . FF u 6y /� 1✓ B'I' iDRF14111 NWGLROOF WERNVp'. YY O EX WOOD \/ \ I� O'A$A IAWN ARRA flEMA1N q / yy / P YIWL EEWE \ S I V _ BOREMAW fff 8293423401 ZONING RL NUMBER OF STORY: 2 \ :L, 16-IlSe TO RE WIN / \ CONSTRUCTIONTYPE: / \ J. -THE/ GOOER: iO RE1WN / \ m -,REE \ i.AEPNE NU CaRORMA ENERGY CODE RENEI ^'y . 14 CAUFORNA PLUGIANG GPCI EEI4 GI I.S. FIRE COOEIGFG) NIIGNFOgNA&IILOIAG GOO, GBCI " SITE PLAN SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESCRIPFOW. SINGLE FAMILY NOME REMODEL PROJECTADDRESS: 1811 ACACIA HILL RD MAMONOBARCA9170 LOTSIZE. 11,INSF ACCESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 8293423401 ZONING RL NUMBER OF STORY: 2 DEWUFFON: ALL MISTING UMTS OCCUPANCYGROUP: R4N CONSTRUCTIONTYPE: V•B FIRE SPRINKLER'. FULLYSPRINKLER GOOER: mL41roux1AREsroErnuLlcgq u .3GUORMA ELECTRIGL ICEGI NU CaRORMA ENERGY CODE RENEI n CALDOWE, FECPMYCAL GAIGI . 14 CAUFORNA PLUGIANG GPCI EEI4 GI I.S. FIRE COOEIGFG) NIIGNFOgNA&IILOIAG GOO, GBCI NI]FA'EAGY 11"11RH LCGL AOAk'lAMH11S LII) GOFGRNIA GREEN BNLOWG SIARRAM GORE AN ..E1':RHLOGLAOUEAVMEx14 SITE DATA 1 BUILDING DATA WASEA 1"Im Il EARR.-EEORIER., MM4: PEORGOLL5.4PATI; 111RPAPYI EXL)IR.V .IIRXIIgSPACEE: E .I.. BEORGOWIRAM B EEELO.M., I RA., 11 LIORARYI R,,ER. HA. VA.IOOM O: E REAFG LLIN E TR`21sT FLOOR WIN. AREA: 1.181 EF XIEPNG LID FLW RLNING AREA: POS SF EXISTINM R4LtANY 1s 4F AGOITYJNALCALCONY'. 14] 4F AOORIONAREA AIR SF COVERED FORCH: Els sF GARAGE q0i SF PROITR..."ORNOLNINOAREA ;ms sr PROPoSEOOVIlO1NGLMNGMCA s,ft] sF =,Y• Y WNO�v.vAMu✓.w .P"Tlpx APUJ EARTNOLOTCGRTRAW: E,f9E/11.I6B=EB.W% PROPOSEOLOTCOVERbE: B,tBB111.16S�B9Ai% WAR µ) If WCPLLOWAs(FLOVEMCE_1%f VF II.IBA SF=I.IBBIBFj NOTES EX. ISIORY HONE MTORY RUE i )5.1• �'4'�P. EX. iS TORY i VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"= 50'4" SITE PLAN Al CA10 I INN CLGVH I IU140 711111 Hi 1 VIII EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'4" 0 0 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = T-0" L EXISTING SIDE (E) ELEVATION SCALE: 118" =1'-0" EXISTING SIDE (W) ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= i�o" I S I ufpn,e9For �� rMUrV0r.lJ CLGVH I IVIV.7 NOTE: - • NEW WINDOW STYLES AND INSTALLATION SHALL MATCH EXISTING • CLOUDED AREAS ARE WHERE ADDITIONS APPLIED I. O • PROPOSED EAVE LENGTH SHALL MATCH EXISTING I �t coa rnS1 ADDITION ATGRWND FLOOR LOWER SPLTLEVEL 'y on xsry Raov rD Euicxeewmw L -tea ms r � EICxWFiOPEAW II E mu �— -16 ONMIINI. MINGB: MATERIAL SCHEDULE ,I^^ s " 444 rylswlssnls (E) -EXISTING, (N) -NEW (n z a Eunsx. eFPYzs IIF L (E) ROOF TILES: SHINGLE, COLOR: GRAY a_XmH 2 (N( ROOF TILES: SHINGLE, COLOR GRAY TO Q„ MATCH EXISTING, GAF 1 3 (E) CEMENT PLASTER SMOOTH FINISH, u- — +-�I �, - - p BEIGE TONE r 4. CEMENT PLASTER: SMOOTH STUCCOED, C COLOR 70 MATCH EXISTING (BEIGE TONE),P- Q--� 174 DESERT BEIGE MERLEX STUCCO ❑. ....., y 5. (E( VINYLWINDOW: COLOR WHITE, NO GRIDS -IuwcomaleORnxvsDUDw000wRnaB DDDa sruueosaavu -1 6. IN) VINYL WINDOW: COLOR WHITE TO MATCH - IawcY ,,'I,WYSMIDwomENmvBwA, SIAMP BRYAN EXISTING, NO GRIDS, MILGARD WINDOWS 7. (E( FASCIA BOARD: 2X4 WOOD, PAINTED FRONT (N) ELEVATION WHITE (N) FASCIA BOARD: DSCALE: 118"=1'-O" B WHTE(WOODWORKXBY OOTHERD'PAINTED LLI 9. (E) WINDOWIDOOR CASING: COLOR WHITE Lo 10. (N) WINDOWIDOOR CASING: COLOR WHITEO DO �� -- TO MATCH EXISTING Q 1 - 11. (E( WOOD SIDING: VERTICAL SIDING, COLOR: _ O) HARTFORD GREEN OR EQUIVALENT a _ y / 12 (N( WOOD SIDING: HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, STAINED BANNISTER BROWN DE6069 (DUNN J ---I L) EDWARDS), 8" LAP SIDING FROM JAMES = n HARDIE WOOD SIDING a a_ 13. (E) GARAGE DOOR WHITE WOOD Q U m - - - — - — 14. (N) GARAGE DOOR: CONTEMPORARY SOLID WOOD GARAGE WOOD STAINED BROWN TO LL Q 0 MATCH NEW WOOD SIDING 0 Z (CLOUDEO)ADOGRON AT GROUND FLOOR UPPER SPLITLuW a 15, (E( RAIN GUTTERS: WHITE LL,I a 0 i6. (N) RAIN GUTTERS: WHITE TO MATCH REAR (S) ELEVATION L SEL EXISTING. ALUMINUM 0 c Q SCALE: 118" = V-0'1 Z (CLWDEDIAp01RONATGROUNO ftWR L-1 \ FCLOUOEOIAODITION AT GROUND FLOOR UPPERSPUT LEVEL LOWER SFIIi LEVEL — RRVIOE4PHTWI RAILING AT WOOD1 DECK BALCONY, BLACK [J SIDE (E) ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = T-0" HEIGHTOF NEW ROOF LLSTCHES EXISTING. FLOORUPPER ADDITION AROUND ER SPLIT LEVEL ��— LJ�- ELEVATIONS SIDE (W) ELEVATION - SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" A3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: SUMMARY: 7.2 August 8, 2017 Development Review No. PL2017-41 2522 Steeplechase Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8713-010-011) Rural Residential (RR) Rural Residential (RR) Joyce Chen 2522 Steeplechase Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Fariba Shantiyai 3670 W. Temple Ave. Suite 193 Pomona, CA 91768 The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to: • Construct a 900 square -foot room addition; • Construct a 863 square -foot three -car garage; • Construct a 538 square feet of balcony/deck/patio area; and • Convert the existing 1,060 square -foot garage into livable space. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL2017-41, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the east side of Steeplechase Lane, between Reata Place and Razzak Circle. The property was developed in 1979 under Los Angeles County standards with a 4,844 square -foot single family residence and 1,060 square -foot attached garage. There are no protected trees on site. The property is legally described as Lot 17 of Tract No. 30578, and Assessor's Parcel Number (AP N) is 8713-010-011. Project Description The proposed addition is located at the front of the existing residence and consists of the following components: PROJECT SUMMARY (square footaael Living Area Existing 4,844 New 900 Converted Garage Space 1,060 Total 6,804 Total Living Area 6,804 Garage Existing 1,060 New 863 Converted to Living -1,060 Total Garage Area 863 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 7,667 Balcony/Porch/Patio Areas Existing 670 New 538 Total 1,208 Total Balcony/Porch/Patio Area 1,208 The existing three-level home sits on split-level pads on an ascending slope with a driveway that is approximately 150 -foot long. The existing house is oriented toward the south side property line and the garage is oriented to the west, facing the front property line. The house consists of common areas (family room, dining room, living room, and kitchen), laundry room, sewing/working room, a master bedroom suite, two bedrooms, one bathroom, and a three -car garage. The applicant is proposing to construct a new 863 square -foot, three -car garage on the first level and a 900 square -foot guest suite (bedroom, bathroom and walk-in closet) with a 478 square -foot balcony above the proposed garage. Additionally, the existing 1,060 square -foot garage will be converted into a rumpus room. The height of the existing house is 35 feet. With the addition, the height will remain the same as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 2 of 10 Site and Grading Configuration: The subject property is a rectangular lot, except for the rear property line which is at a skewed angle. The existing house is situated on two leveled pads. The property has an ascending slope that starts at the front of the property, and then descends at the rear of the property. There are existing retaining walls throughout the property that create buildable pads and driveway access from the street. The applicant is proposing to widen the existing driveway by constructing a two -foot high retaining wall along the west side of the driveway. Additionally, the new garage will be reoriented providing access from the north (side of the property), as opposed to the existing garage that is accessed from the west (front of the property). A four -foot high retaining wall is proposed to widen the driveway maneuvering area behind the garage doors so that the required 24 -foot unobstructed backout area from the garage is provided. Additional retaining walls are proposed for landscaped planter areas. The applicant is proposing to cut 275 cubic yards and fill 90 cubic yards of soil. The excess 185 cubic yards of cut will be exported from the site. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the existing house is Neoclassical with brick veneer, evenly spaced windows, large balconies and a side gabled roof. The proposed addition will have stucco, brick veneer, and wrought iron railing to match the existing house. The proposed addition will preserve the architectural integrity of the existing construction by matching exterior colors and building materials. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 3 of 10 DesignationGeneral Plan Zoning District RR Single Family Residential Site Rural Residential North Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential South Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential East17: Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential West Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 3 of 10 H F � _,yye�frs L 9 View of the Subject Property from Steeplechase Lane View of the House from the Driveway Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 5 of 10 Proposed North Elevation Proposed West Elevation ANALYSIS Review Authority The proposed project requires a land use approval through the Development Review process. The analysis that follows provides the basis for staff's recommendation to approve the Development Review application. Development Review (DBMC Section 22.48) Additions which are equal to or greater than 50 percent of the existing habitable floor area of all existing structures on site, or substantially change the appearance of an existing residence Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 6 of 10 require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RR zone: .- -..N rim • • . 30 feet 142'-8" 102 feet Yes 10 feet on one side and 35 feet— north side 20 feet— north side • •' 15 feet on the other side 20'-6"— south side 20'-6'.— south side Yes • 15 feet 62'-9" —north side 62'-9" —north side Yes 51'-2"— south side 51'-2"— south side • • • 25 feet 52'-3" 52'-3" Yes • Maximum of 30% 8.2% 10.3% Yes Limit 35 feet 26'-2" 26'-2" Yes Parking 2 -car garage 3 -car garage 2 -car garage Yes Landscaping The applicant is proposing to enhance the landscaping by replanting the slope at the front and south side of the property with a variety of shrubs, including: 5 -gallon deer grass, ceanothus, lavender, and creeping rosemary and 1 -gallon sage brush and three -awn. Ceanothus "Hunting Carpet" Rosemary Deer Grass Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 7 of 10 All plant types will be drought tolerant and non-invasive species. The project is required to comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance, which is noted on the preliminary landscape plans and will be verified during building plan check and final inspections. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance (DBMC Section 22.22) The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The project site was designed with: • All proposed retaining walls associated with the building pads are at a maximum exposed height of four feet and stuccoed to match the existing house; • The subject property is terraced on split-level pads; and • The height of the existing house is 35 feet. With the addition, the height will remain the same as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. Compatibility with Neighborhood The project is located between a one-story home to the north and a two-story home to the south. The existing house is a three-level home on two split-level pads. The project is designed to be compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition at the front of the house is located approximately 102 feet from the front property line, more than the required minimum 30 -foot front setback. The addition of the garage and guest room is located on a lower pad than the rest of the house. Therefore, even though the addition is two stories, it will be located on a lower pad than the existing house. The exterior architectural materials and details of the addition will match those of the existing structure. The addition will thus be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • The addition will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks; • A gradual transition between the addition and existing residence is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height and window and door placement; • Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; • The architectural design accentuates simplicity of line and form, and restrained and understated elegance; • The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors and materials throughout the proposed addition; Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 8 of 10 • The proposed roof type, pitch and materials of the addition match the primary structure; and • The proposed balcony is oriented toward the front yard area and existing house on the adjacent lot. Privacy and Sensitivity to Adjacent Neighbors: Staff reviewed the location of the proposed balcony at the front of the house to verify that there will be minimal privacy concerns with the adjacent neighbors. The balcony is located above the proposed garage addition at the front of the house, facing southwest. The property is located at a higher elevation than the adjacent property to the south and the proposed balcony will be facing the roof of the adjacent home to the south. There are no windows facing the subject property since the house on the adjacent lot is built into the ascending slope. Therefore, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property. Southwest Perspective of Subject Property Deed Restriction: If the proposed project is approved, the residence will have a total of four bedrooms and three bathrooms. Staff is including a condition of approval requiring a deed restriction to be recorded with the County of Los Angeles which restricts the rental of rooms of other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house. Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 9 of 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On July 27, 2017, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On July 28, 2017, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: Natali . EspL04 Assistant Planher Attachments: Reviewed by: Grac . L e Senior Planner Draft Resolution No. 2017 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval Architectural, Grading and Landscape Plans Development Review No. PL 2017-41 Page 10 of 10 PLANNING COMMISSION Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2017-41 TO CONVERT AN EXISTING 1,060 SQUARE -FOOT GARAGE INTO LIVING SPACE AND CONSTRUCT A 900 SQUARE -FOOT BEDROOM ADDITION, 868 SQUARE -FOOT THREE -CAR GARAGE, AND 538 SQUARE FEET OF BALCONY/DECK/PATIO AREA TO AN EXISTING 4,844 SQUARE - FOOT RESIDENCE ON A 1.04 GROSS ACRE (45,302 GROSS SQUARE - FOOT) LOT AT 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-010-011). A. RECITALS 1. The property owner, Joyce Chen, and applicant, Fariba Shantiyai, have filed an application for Development Review No. PL2017-41 to convert an existing 1,060 square -foot three -car garage into living space and construct a 900 square -foot bedroom addition, 863 square -foot garage, and 538 square feet of balcony/deck/patio area to an existing 4,844 square -foot single-family residence located at 2522 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 45,302 gross square feet (1.04 gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 17 of Tract No. 30578. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8713-010-011. 4. On July 27, 2017, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site. On July 28, 2017, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 5. On August 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The design and layout of the garage conversion into livable area and construction of a 900 square -foot room addition; 863 square -foot garage, and a 538 square feet of balcony/deck/patio area to an existing three-level, single-family residence is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and Development Code standards. The proposed addition will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating matching exterior colors and building materials. The mass and scale of the addition are proportionate to the existing house and surrounding properties. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed addition will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also 2 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX single-family homes. According to the applicant, no protected trees exist on site. The proposed addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single- family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The project is located between a one-story home to the north and a two- story home to the south. The new garage is proposed at the front of the house and the room addition is proposed above the garage. The project is designed to be compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition does not further encroach into the existing front, rear or side setbacks. The proposed balcony is located above the proposed garage addition at the front of the house, facing southwest. The property is located at a higher elevation than the adjacent property to the south and the proposed balcony will be facing the roof of the adjacent home to the south. There are no windows facing the subject property since the house on the adjacent lot is built into the ascending slope. Therefore, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property. The proposed addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. The existing architectural style is Neoclassical with brick veneer, split-level floors, evenly spaced windows, large balconies, and side gabled roof. The applicant is proposing to preserve the architectural integrity by matching the existing roof style and exterior materials. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall record, and provide the City with a conformed recorded copy of, a Covenant and Agreement or similar document in a form approved by the City Attorney, which restricts the rental of rooms or other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house, except to the extent otherwise permitted by the Diamond Bar Municipal Code or applicable state or federal law. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Joyce Chen, 2522 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, and applicant, Fariba Shantiyai, 3670 W. Temple Ave. Suite 193, Pomona, CA 91768. 4 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Raymond Wolfe, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 5 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Irl I l l COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 �tslm , �r STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. PL 2017-41 SUBJECT: To convert an existing 1,060 square -foot garage into living area and construct a 900 square -foot room addition, 863 square -foot garage, and a 538 square feet of balcony/patio/deck area to an existing 4,844 square -foot three-level, single-family residence. PROPERTY Joyce Chen OWNER: 2522 Steeplechase Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Fariba Shantiyai 3670 W. Temple Ave. Suite 193 Pomona, CA 91768 LOCATION: 2522 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. I. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. PL2017-41 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 6 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL2017-41, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The hours during which construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work are limited to Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., or at any time on Sundays or holidays. 11. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review No. PL2017-41 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one- year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 8 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. This approval is to convert an existing 1,060 square -foot garage into living area and construct a 900 square -foot room addition, 863 square -foot garage, 538 square feet of balcony/deck/patio area to an existing 4,844 square -foot, three-level, single-family residence with an located at 2522 Steeplechase Lane, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non-compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non- compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and 9 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition; or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. II. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion 10 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 6. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 20 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 7. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11 PC Resolution No. 2017AX a C. A pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with grading permits. 10. Final grade certifications by project civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. DRAINAGE Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. UTILITIES Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. III. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Conditions: At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2016 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. 12 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code. 3. Only one single family dwelling is allowed on this property unless specifically approved otherwise per CBC 202. The "rumpus room" shall be not be used as a secondary kitchen or unit. Plan Check — Items to be addressed prior to plan approval: 4. The design of the existing 10' retaining wall behind the garage addition shall be evaluated and designed by the structural and soils engineer to provide a detailed design with shoring and underpinning. A shotcrete wall, soldier piles, or other shoring method must be provided and approved in plan check prior to any demolition adjacent to the existing retaining wall system. 5. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 6. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 7. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 8. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall(s) locations. These plans shall be consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building and Safety Division. 9. "Separate permits are required for retaining walls" and shall be noted on plans. 10. All balconies shall be designed for 60lb/ft live load. 11. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 12. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone, it shall meet requirements of the fire zone per CBC Chapter 7A. 13 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. c. Eaves shall be protected. d. Exterior construction shall be one-hour or non-combustible. e. Fuel modification plans shall be approved through LA County Fire Fuel Modification Unit. f. LA County Fire shall approve plans for fire flow availability due to home being over 3600 sf as required per CFC Appendix B105.1. 13. All retaining walls shall be separately submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Works/Engineering Departments for review and approval. 14. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 15. Slope setbacks shall be consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 16. Light and ventilation shall comply with CBC 1203 and 1205. Permit — Items required prior to building permit issuance: 17. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 18. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 19. Submit grading plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 20. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 21. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 14 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Construction — Conditions required during construction: 22. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred -eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 23. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 24. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 25. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 26. The location of property lines may require a survey to be determined by the building inspection during foundation and/or frame inspection. 27. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 28. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 29. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 30. Pursuant to California Residential Code (CRC) Section R315, carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms. 31. Drainage patterns shall match the approved grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as -built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as -built grading/drainage plan. 15 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX 32. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4"/ft with approved and listed water proofing material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42" minimum in height, 4" maximum spacing between rails, and capable of resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 33. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. 34. All plumbing fixtures, including those in existing areas, shall be low -flow models consistent with California Civil Code Section 1101.1 to 1101.8. W 191 16 PC Resolution No. 2017 -XX Attachment 2 RECEIVED JUL 2 x 2017 CITY OF b(gMOND BAR LEGAL DESCRIPTION IOIIW: urt mioaooii mmx �MpAwXrmwlwl vuc¢A]rA AI,E]E 6= ino%ss sasnmcaweue WWA/J XNG%IS TIWAAIYQIIriQ IOINAlY6R611 PROJECT SUMMARY FlWf NLOR ]AWGG]� ]LOTMIXOR I.AIIfiYd55' AttIfLW ItwGwre Xawosssi RarnnonAmme PWwocs% H6fXKflPFtk AA49:553 POIiPA1pIXIfNSV! WdRO'$f lOiWh!•Na'E F%6MGHf6TflGGl ]A'DA19546' IEW 6l4NE W1GY644 1011l AAIGW)SSS WIOE9W£ �2Y19�AIR14= f0R AIOIXIXIEMiM: MMAMt 94 SCOPE OF WORK RH]IAttN AW IAYIMJt OMSEf�NOFfSbRIGGA0.AIL %N MMR5fAY4 MJIGN6AY F1EYAl0AM}IMEAEW PJMGE NTEfM1YPJYkF1 A4SgYCF W61WC[l O.W MENEWG'.W£F[flANfN WSfrAEfMtiAI 'MIX W1tlIf.HAWp WYlfAF1W118LN4ioT1E1GREFNIM:XEM 51f➢f911LLiMNOWYIF MMLfCMWRh1A1ffi/Rq: WA1D W91MOF[WVEWAYWARRW]Ii011ENRVS'MW IIS41 xtt+rtmxrnnE>umuvproPrvvn vsnxOXoniva vert Wmm]smxnrcAw ,ognai AWfPM M�vaAvux m�natts, wmWamAowru� XWPPSSSF Rm PAW IROPJ rtMTPAro EMI@IIXYt WPM6Sv SHEETINDEX AM i1XE6XEEiwo.9WLWI M AM 0.YAHILLLLMIEP.W AW wo9X,lcY OM %1lMNAfAWNERW.l111E9&Ei o@ tlV.pIGAg4➢VGFIIMI. Pf¢(EEGVLNOAtlWLNENAY CW IMM1Rp6gVHlAEPIN-UBIQIff/(fAlKV1A501i[Wi0.lYIKlILW 1801 CgK811W1UYJ%'ARRNI Aq FWSIWWVIYXR4f, A195EWt01&flflIXflflN49 AW LUCUIpXflLGIRWd A6 dfM£IE48fIWl NN Aq H6ILLlIlA0.Y1PAVA�PIYIIPLW Ap 9]9g19kYAMYB VICINITY MAP PBwEcrlflcAnox i` �w' o CHEN RESIDENCE NNTTSlOYMAP TITLE SHEET AND OVERALL SITE PLAN PROPOSED ADDITION MWW�] wM�WM��Y��%PX�aME P%WAW�o wAXwmG.wP Wwssmwowr�mnswwvMmsuvarmai]rt rcxPxAwuuG:lexmamunwoMrAroWzertcnaaurr�. UJIGJD@i: 161DP-ol MSDCIAIMAPPRDVAL DATE: D%4"IT PUNNING RRIENSUBMUAL WWW17 HEVISIDNS. 05I04a Gs�lareov SHEUNUMBEN: A-01 LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. 252 AND MRS. CHEN T A WORTEMPIEAVENUUUNEI9JIPOMONACAIIFDPNIA91768 TEL909MIIIIG VAVN.UMG.AU sG>u@; tre'=Tr-0• 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 �� ..ir avP+r+'�Jry�uatlnV..rvlrry ]bmNe�t �Wav�amr.,adrllM.'t..ammmpkm]wuieugpuvk xa D @ 1@ 3T �Hp 6 I; 32' CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IMGJOB7. 1610@.01 A102" Scalo: 1/6'=V-0, A-02 B6 CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ----(900}--_ 18" SITE PLAN LEGEND o rouro� ® nsmoaEruauw.wrouv�w nwauacw.m � eewmxmu.,pn.wua .wurcosuumcaxmeowrwa a�Nne.mwwwnoxuua3u3rs auw.vewx�uuunwrrmraxarmru�wiamxs.�uu<aarnvswsre��a�xo�nsenemwm w.unwieetigmica�maxmuuerne awwunmvuNwwnoertrmwuunnsw�o��aawonnoxaeruoua�ehcrroawrx LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A 3830W.l PMAVWUE. SME 1931 POMONA IGL LA 91788 IEL80.M.1010 WW WSNU muveyPwq,m anlui.umsxsemo xo,em.Mms.,.m+w�+n.e,.wV.yam,4+�.*'oe.b'a�m.n,tuimwr+tr.+x recammenpnr�+'ra'rea.,� w m.ax uv+�•+.a.nme wO�mnYr(bt Wr.xw.a O PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY IAOGJf191 I61W2.01 RMIONS, A-03 11, O8 CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 PROJECT SITE V 1 .. VA4[ IIMYU VICINITY MAP N.T.S. UVFMSCM9. f/Y. 8pYM1MMI N139PIRG15 9NMY IlE W.MTpILL4 M01UY IpI NA[CfACRW PJISIIYJS/CIWL6VSIpAS MIH!&MPS®p11NEPt695Eb AV WNF9XlAlpq'gl W.VWVIIESA9EEW65f➢CPIWVfOBYM6tMWNGML P.W RiCP LIkNfPF4WNWIiMSpCIpNCLWMUKK1 tlAY.VA6A9[CENGWAE LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A U70W.i P1 AMUE,SUIHIM I POMW I WORNIA 917H 1E19098W.1010 WM4."NEf ouo�wq,m mv.wwr+nsPesWrMo M)RIId FAm�ahwsfMFn@nWiwlj..Mb YVf1M4 qNy ANs�nAtiastl CiMiw'6NMVrvwilptlq WmeWyPwM W xm�a para aurywaue ymwNyeE F/Ff NMxI GRADING GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL GRADING SHALL COMPLY WW THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 33 AND APPENDIX OF INE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (2010). 2. ALL HILLSIDE GRADING WITH SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 105 SHALL COMPLY WITH ME HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE AND SHALL TYPICALLY NOT EXCEED 2:1. 3, NO GRADING SHALL COMMENCE UNRL A GRACING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY ME CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 4. ALL DLL SLOPES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS MAN 90 PERCENT OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY. 5, SUFFICIENT TESTS OF SOIL PROPERTIES. INCLUDING SGL TYPES AND SHEAR STRENGTHS SHALL BE MADE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN CRITERIA. ME RESULTS OF SUCH TESTING SHALL BE REPORTED IN ME FINAL AS -GRADED REPORT (PREPARED BY ME APPLICANT AT HIS EXPENSE), OR UPON REQUEST OF ME CITY. A MINIMUM NUMBER OF MUD DENSITY EST ARE TO BE MADE AS FOLLOWS: a. ONE LEST FOR EACH TWO -FOOT VERTICAL UFT. b. ONE LEST FOR EACH too CUBIC YARDS BE MATERIAL PLACED. c. A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF FINISH SLOPE TESTS TO VERFY COMPACTION OF THE SLOPE SURFACE. 6. NO NU_ SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL STRPING OF VEGETATION, REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOILS, AND INSTALLATION BE SUB DRAINS (IF NEEDED) IS ACCEPTED BY INE SOILS ENGINEER OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST. 7. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL ME PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURE FOR WE PROJECT IS ACCEPTED BY ME CITY. B. TIE UNDERSIGNED CIVIL ENGINEER HEREBY STALES THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY HIM OF UNDER HIS SUPERVISION AND MAT TIE PLANS CONFORM TO ALL PERTINENT OF SECTION 1803 AND APPENDIX J, EXCAVATION AND GRADING. OF TIE CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE (2018). MIDONG UU M6242 01/07/2017 REGISTERED ENGINEER R.C.E. DAIS 9. APPROVED PROLECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES FROM DEPOSITION OF MATERIAL OR DIVERTED ROWS BOW DURING AND AFTER ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. ALL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED TO WE SATISFACTION OF TIE CITY ENGINEER. It. HOUGH GRADING CERTIFICATE MUST BE SIGNED BY SOILS AND CML ENGINEERS BE RECORD AND APPROVED BY ME CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 12. ALL CUM SHALL BE OBSERVED BY ME ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD DURING GRADING SO THAT MY ADVERSE CONDITIONS CAN HE RECOGNIZED AND CONNECTED. 13. MY MODIFICATIONS OF OR CHANGED IN. ME APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. 14. ALL GRADED SITES MUST HAVE DRAINAGE SWALES, BERMS. AND OTHER DRAINAGE DEVICES APPROVED AT THE ROUGH GRADING STAGE. 15, NO ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN B' IN DIAMETER WILL BE PLACED IN TIE FILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE CITY. 16. GRADING OPERATIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED UNDER WE CONTINUOUS OBSERVATION OF ME SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ME ENGINEER GEOLOGIST BE RECORD. 17. EXCAVATIONS FOR STABILITY KEYS AND REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOILS MUST BE OBSERVED AND ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY ME SOILS ENGINEER OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD PRIOR TO ME PLACING OF FlLL. 18. IDE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD MUST DOCUMENT AND ACCEPT ROUGH GRADING BY FINAL REPORT PRIOR TO APPROVAL BY ME CITY. ME FINAL REPORT MUST INCLUDE AN AS -GRADED GEOTECHNICAL MAP. 19. ME SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD MUST MAKE A FINDING IN ACCORDANCE AM SECTION 111 OF ME LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE FOR WE GRADED SIM PRIOR TO APPROVAL BY ME GIN. 20. FOUNDATION AND/OR WALL EXCAVATIONS MUST BE OBSERVED AND ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY ME SOILS ENGINEER OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD PRIOR TO PLACING STEEL OR CONCRETE. 21. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A GRADING CERTFICATE TO ME CITY ENGINEER NO MORE MAN 10 WORKING DAYS UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING OPERATIONS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE ISSUED SUBJECT TO ME CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF SAID ENGMEER'S CERTIFICATE FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BY ME CITY BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WILL BE ALLOWED. 22 WE SOILS AND GEOLOGY REPORT PREPARED BY XXXXXXXXXX. INC AND GATED 01/07/2017 SHALL BECOME A PMT OF THIS GRADING PLAN AND ALL RECOMMENDATIMS CONTAINED THEREIN SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED M. 23, A COPY OF ME GRADING PERMIT AND APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE IN ME POSSESSION OF A RESPONSIBLE PERSON AND AVAILABLE AT ME SIZE AT ALL TIMES. 24. FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WLL BE ALLOWED. 25. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN CHECKED ME CITY OF DIAMOND BM ONLY FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS, COMPUANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND FOR GENERAL CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF WE DRAINAGE AND PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON. NO DETAILED MATHEMATICAL CHECK WAS MADE FOR ME ACCURACY IF ME EXISTING OR PROPGMO DIMENSIONS. LINES. OR GRADES SHOWN INCLUDING ALL EXISTING UFUTES SHOWN OR NOT MOM. 25, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ME CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE AT (909) 839-7040 FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF INTENTION TO BEGIN GRADING. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WTH ME CALIFORNIA STORM WATER REST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES HANDBOOKS AND ME PROJECTS STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLM (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS AS NECESSARY. 28. DIRECT ALL ROOFTOP RUNOFF TO PERVIOUS AREAS. 29. SUFFICIENT TEST OF FlLL SOLS SHALL BE MADE DURING ME GRADING TO VERIFY THAT WE SOILS PROPERTIES COMPLY WIM WE DEGGN REQUIREMENTS. AS DETERMINED BY ME GEOLOGICAL ENGINEER INCLUDING SOILS TYPES, SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS AND CORRESPONDING UNIT WEIGHTS. 30. R -VALUE TESTS SHALL BE CONDUCTED FOR ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO IDENTIFY ME MINIMUM PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR ME SUE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOT REWIRED BY ME CITY. 31. TYPE V CEMENT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL CONCRETE WORK COMING IN CONTACT WITH ME GROUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED BY ME PROJECTS SOLS ENGINEER. PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN BENCHMARK LOT 17, TRACT 30578. IN ME CITY BE DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STALE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 785, PAGE 1-25 BE MAPS, IN ME OFFICE OF WE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. APN: 8713-010-011 BENCHMARK U CO. BM G-5075 OTTERBEIN 2005 ELEV. 736.983 DPW BM TAG IN W CB DIAMOND BAR BLVD 1M (3FT)N/0 BCRMW CDR FOUNRTAIN SPRINGS RD BASIS OF BEARING SWINGS PRE BASED ON ME CENTERLINE OF STEEPLECHASE LANE BUNG MOM 45'28'08' EAST PER TRACT MAP 30578, MB 785, 1-25. EARTHWORK CUT.......... 275 CY FILL......... 90 CY OVEREXCAVARON.......... 330 CY EXPORT .......... 165 CY SPECIAL NOTE: THE OUANTITIM SHOWN HEREON ME FOR PERMIT AND BONDING PURPOSES ONLY. WE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY QUMM- IES PRIOR TO START OF OWING LEGEND: EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONE R-1 PROPOSED W NO OATS OF GRADING 09 IS 20O COMPLEOON 11 15 2017 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAP TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS PERFORMED RASED ON FlELO SURVEY BY APPLE ENGINEERING DATED ON 10-25-2016 PROPERTYAREA. 41,622 SF (0.956 ACRE) DISTURBEDAREA: XXXX SF (QUICK ACRE) 32. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND ME TRANSPORTATION OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS AND OPERATION OF HEAVY GRADING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UMITEG TO BETWEEN WE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 300 P.M., MONDAY. THROUGH SATURUAY. DUST GENERATED BY GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIM IES SHALL HE REDUCED BY WATERING ME WE PRION TO AND DURING ME ACTIVITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH COAST AIR QUAUTY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RULE 402 AND RULE 403. RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE USED WHENEVER POSSIBLE. ADDITMALLY, ALL CONSTMCDON EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MUFFLED TO REDUCE NOISE LEVELS. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ATTACHMENT B BMP'S ECt -- SCROULING ECP -- PRESERVATION OF EXISTING WGETABM EC3 - HYDRAULIC MULCH EC4 -- HYDROSEEDING EC5 -- SOIL BINDERS EC6 -- STRAW MULCH EC7 -- GEOTEXTUH h MATS ECB -- WOOD MULCHING ME - FARM DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALES 010 -VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES ECI1 --SLOPE DRAINS EWO- EARN DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALES NSI-- WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES NS2 -- DEWATERING OPERATIONS NS3 -- PAVING MD GRINDING OPERATIMS NS4 -- TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING NS5 -- CUM WATER DIVERSION N56 -- ILLICIT C0flNEC110N/OISCNARGE NS7 -- POTABLE WATEMRRIGABON NSB -- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING NS9-- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING NS10 -- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SEI -- SILT FENCE SEZ -- SEDIMENT BASIN SE3 -- SEDIMENT TRAP SE4 -- CHECK DM SES -- FIBER ROLLS SEES -- GRAVEL BAG BERM STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMING MID -- STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION W13 -- STORM DRAIN SIGNAGE TCI -- STMIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXIT TC2 -- STASIUZED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY TC3 -- ENTRANCE/CURET BRE WASH WEI -- WHO EROSION CONTROL Ml - MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE WM2 -- MATERIAL USE WM3 -- STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT WM4 -- SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL WM5 -- SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MUD -- HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT W47 -- CONTAMINATION SOIL MANAGEMENT MIT -- CMCIREM WASTE MANAGEMENT WMR -- SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT ATTACHMENT PROJECT. I HAVE REVIEWED ME BEST FIA STORM WATER QUALITY TASK ME IMPLEMENTATION OL ME BEST TO EFFECTIVELY MINIMIZE ME JCTON ACTIVITIES M ME FROM THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT F SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: PROPERTY BOUNDARY BALE: - - - LOT UNE - - - - - CENTERLINE - CFFSITE R/W PROJECT ADDRESS: EASEMENT UNE STORM DRAIN - -- SEWER UNE - - - - WATER UNE ASPH = ASPHALT TF = TOP OF FOOTING FS= FINISH SURFACE FG FINISH GRACE INV INVERT BW = BACK OF WALK MH = MANHOLE FF = FINISH FLOOR TG = TOP OF GRATE BE a DEEP FOOTING R = ROW LINE M = STREET LIGHT HP = HIGH PONT SMH - SEWER MANHOLE TP = TELEPHONE POLE TW = TOP OF WALL WJ = WATER METER WV = WATER VALVE SANDBAG EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL UMITS OF GRADING EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONE R-1 PROPOSED W NO OATS OF GRADING 09 IS 20O COMPLEOON 11 15 2017 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAP TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS PERFORMED RASED ON FlELO SURVEY BY APPLE ENGINEERING DATED ON 10-25-2016 PROPERTYAREA. 41,622 SF (0.956 ACRE) DISTURBEDAREA: XXXX SF (QUICK ACRE) 32. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND ME TRANSPORTATION OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS AND OPERATION OF HEAVY GRADING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UMITEG TO BETWEEN WE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 300 P.M., MONDAY. THROUGH SATURUAY. DUST GENERATED BY GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIM IES SHALL HE REDUCED BY WATERING ME WE PRION TO AND DURING ME ACTIVITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH COAST AIR QUAUTY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RULE 402 AND RULE 403. RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE USED WHENEVER POSSIBLE. ADDITMALLY, ALL CONSTMCDON EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MUFFLED TO REDUCE NOISE LEVELS. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ATTACHMENT B BMP'S ECt -- SCROULING ECP -- PRESERVATION OF EXISTING WGETABM EC3 - HYDRAULIC MULCH EC4 -- HYDROSEEDING EC5 -- SOIL BINDERS EC6 -- STRAW MULCH EC7 -- GEOTEXTUH h MATS ECB -- WOOD MULCHING ME - FARM DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALES 010 -VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES ECI1 --SLOPE DRAINS EWO- EARN DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALES NSI-- WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES NS2 -- DEWATERING OPERATIONS NS3 -- PAVING MD GRINDING OPERATIMS NS4 -- TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING NS5 -- CUM WATER DIVERSION N56 -- ILLICIT C0flNEC110N/OISCNARGE NS7 -- POTABLE WATEMRRIGABON NSB -- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING NS9-- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING NS10 -- VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SEI -- SILT FENCE SEZ -- SEDIMENT BASIN SE3 -- SEDIMENT TRAP SE4 -- CHECK DM SES -- FIBER ROLLS SEES -- GRAVEL BAG BERM STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMING MID -- STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION W13 -- STORM DRAIN SIGNAGE TCI -- STMIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXIT TC2 -- STASIUZED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY TC3 -- ENTRANCE/CURET BRE WASH WEI -- WHO EROSION CONTROL Ml - MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE WM2 -- MATERIAL USE WM3 -- STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT WM4 -- SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL WM5 -- SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT MUD -- HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT W47 -- CONTAMINATION SOIL MANAGEMENT MIT -- CMCIREM WASTE MANAGEMENT WMR -- SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT ATTACHMENT PROJECT. I HAVE REVIEWED ME BEST FIA STORM WATER QUALITY TASK ME IMPLEMENTATION OL ME BEST TO EFFECTIVELY MINIMIZE ME JCTON ACTIVITIES M ME FROM THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT F SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: MS JOYCE CHEN BALE: 01///2017 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE 2499 BRENNEN WAY PROJECT ADDRESS: FULLERTON, CA 92835 OF POLLUTANTS / OT DELAYS. 1. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, CALL MS JOYCE CHER AT 714-358-5389 2. A STAND-BY CREW FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING ME RAINY SEASON (OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 15). NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON -SIZE AND STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF EMERGENCY DEMCES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT. 3. EROSION COYMOL DEVICES SHOWN ON MIS PLAN MAY BE REMOVED WHEN APPROVED BY ME BUILDING OFFICIAL IF ME GRADING OPERATION HAS PROGRESSED TO ME POINT WHERE THEY ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED. 4. GRADED AREAS ADJACENT TO FILL SLOPES LOCATED AT INE SITE PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM ME TOP OF SLOPE AT TILE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. ALL LOCM SOILS AND DEBRIS THAT MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFF-SITE PROPERTY SHALL BE STABILIZED OR REMOVED FROM ME SITE ON A DAILY BASIS 5. ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL DEVICES WIMIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM AND BE DISPOSED OF PROPERTY. 6. A CUMD SHALL BE POSTED ON ME SIZE WHENEVER ME DEPTH BE WATER IN ANY DEVICE EXCEEDS TWO FEET. WE DEMCE SHALL BE DRAINED OR PUMPED DRY WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM. PUMPING AND BRAINING OF ALL BASINS AND DRAINAGE DEVICES MUST COMPLY WIM WE APPROPRIATE BMP FOR DEWATERING OPERATIONS. 7. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY INE GRADING INSPECTOR, ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT ME END OF EACH WORKING DAY OR ON WEEKENDS WHEN ME 5 -DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS OX B. ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS YMICH MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFF-SITE PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ME SIIE AS DIRECTED BY TIE GRADING INSPECTOR. 9. ME PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE AND CONTAIN POLLUTANTS WITHIN ME SIZE IS LETT TO ME DISCRETION OF ME FIELD ENGNEER. 10. DESILTING BASINS MAY NOT HE REMOVED OR MADE INOPERABLE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1 AND APRIL 15 OF ME FOLLOINNG YEAR WITHOUT WE APPROVAL OF ME BUILDING OFFICIAL. 11. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED AS ME PROJECT PROGRESSES AND PLANS OF THESE CHANGES MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS REQUIRED. 12. ADD ME FOLLOWING NOTES TO ME PIANS TO DEFINE ME CURRENT STALE OF CONSTRUCTION. R. STORM DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS ME (NOT) CONSTRUCTED. b. STREETS ME (NOT) PAVED, EXCEPT AS NOTED ON ME EROSION CONTROL PLANS. u DRAINAGE DEVICES ARE (NOT) CONSTRUCTED. EXCEPT AS NOTED ON PLANS. 13. STORMWAMR POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE INTEGRATED UNTO ME EROSION CONTROL PLANS PER TIRE 26, SECTION 7010 OF TIE COUNTY CODE FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15. 14. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO ELIMINATE THE DISCHARGE OF NON-STORMWATER FROM ME PROJECT SIZE AT ALL TIMES. 15. DEVELOPERS / CONIRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL DEMCES AND MAKE SURE BMP'S ME INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AT ALL TIMES DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY ATTACHMENT A NOTES: D. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON -SUE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SIZE VIA SHEET FLOW, SWALES. AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES, OR WIND. b. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION-REIETED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPMTED FROM ME SNE BY THE FORCES OF WIND OR WATER. w FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER MAC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WW THEIR LISTING AND ME NOT TO CONTAMINATE ME SOILS AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM ME WEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED BE IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO ME DRAINAGE SYSTEM. M. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO ME PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON-SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SCUD WASTE. e. MASH AND CONSTRUCAM-RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION BE RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WHO. I. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM ME SIR BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. ME CONSTRUCTION MMANCE ROADWAYS MUST HE STABUZED SO M TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEING OEPOSIWD INTO ME PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST HE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS 9. MY SLOPES WTH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STMUZED SO AS TO INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER. I, CATCH BASINS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH FILTER FABRIC AND GRAVEL BAGS. SHEETINDEX DEFC PTCN SHEET NUMBER TILE SHEET 1 PRECISE GRADING k DRAINAGE PLAN 2 OEMOUTION, EROSION k SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 3 PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN / N GRAPHIC SCALE / � V / h ♦ 9�' / NxFE6r) \20\ jC; Y ///1�V. / 7 / EXISflNO 3 HIM \ �S BLOCK WALL TO BE \\ MN E7.7 TO REMOVED p / U P / 0100 FSA0.0 4' EXISTING. - HIGH DCW.W. M1O 866530]0 ] ^IN4.aa I�11�� ys�/ \\a\'H-2.0 as°s:�o a \4R.00 7 o.a 4300 FS mo9y�'mm y%A .... 861 W 1W \ V \ ,II�I/II�v A\ 1959„o2O �,.Dw pdMO v s A o _ey y36 L \I ♦moo. \- �' 1 sz.do Tw 7 F�P� D Q \ \\ \ ;NOTE: L ems EEST DOWNSTREAM CATCHTO BE PROTECI£D PER 935 WEBTRUCTION BMP SE -10 .5417 ft H=I334 Yp,O LOT-16 TRACT 30-578 JMB 786/1-25 APN 9710-010-010 BUILDING FACE DOWN SPOUT PER ARCH'S PLAN DOWN SPOUT ADAPTER OUTLET PIPE ADAPTION I / Fl e P.V.L. RISEN (LENGTH VARIES) 45° E R0 PI P.V.C. DRAIN �e P.V.C. DRAIN PIPE PIPE PER PLAN O S=0.010 MIN. (TOP.) NOTE - EXACT LOCATION OF DOWN SPOUTS TO RE DETERMINED IN Ron BY BUILDER AND SEE ARCHITECT'S PIAN DO NOT CONE CRAZE OR RISER TO PIPE. (NEED TO BE ABLE TO REMOVE FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.) ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION NOT TO SCAEE \S / 974.21 \ � i5 WXtK' s RETAINI PROIEC R OR WALL 5' MIN. 3� Z� 4p ZI o� • � ExN fC K 4W, r5 LL VARIES 2' 3 MIN. MIN. TYPICAL SIDEYARD DETAIL NOT TO SCALE HEIGHT ALE ALL Puce 1.0' REDUCER ADAPTER N.D.S. No.1221 TOR APPROVED EWAL PIPFt RISER 1 I LIG TEE NOTE. FOR BINDING A.B.S. TO P.V.C. CONTRACTOR TO INV. ELEV. USE MEI➢ ON 191 M� (SEE PLAN) SOLVENT OR EWAL a� 12"x12" AREA DRAIN DETAIL(D NOT TO SCALE ICT 13 -MACT 3057F3 NIS 718-5A-2-5 GRADE APN 9710-010%012 12• �G - 6 .T\ PET. / WALL WIT! 6%6 11D OR %OC6W MESH TYPICAL PAVED SWALE© NOT TO SCALE EXISTING 4' PROPOSED BUILDING` WALL EXISTING 3' HIGH BLOCK WALL TO M RENO ED r EXISTING -,,IIF GRAOEJI CONSTRUCT 4• THICKNESS CONCRETE SIDEWALK - \ \\ �1� APPROVED BY. OEOIECHNICAL ENGINEER STATEMENT CIN � R�WO BAR OF OOMPWNCE TAVO THIS PVN HAS BEEN REMOVED ME O W R.GE 41(SJ. q1T FNOMO AND DEEMED TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WnH THE RECON EN� SIN WR NOR HIS) PVNS REMEWED Bh 1 \ \ DAM 01 09. 200 PROJECT NO. \ \ 1. p\ \fin 5690-01 RENEW WAS UMIXD TO .., ef`SJnICrjG3FMEA\ -`v' TIE CEDE , .1. ASPEO. OF THE PLAN THEY. W£ MANE NO REPRESENTATON AS TO r THE ACWRACY OF THE DIMENAW. JON E. BWRGETS MEASUREMENT$ CALWIATONS, Ti MY R.C.E. ]0424. EXP. ]/ PORTON OF THE DEADN. ✓ OAIE REMENIL NO PLANS PREPARED BY. - 12' H SECTION A -A NOT TO SCALE EXISTING GRADE (663.67) PROPOSED SECTION B -B NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION NOTES & QUANTITIES: UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL: TOLL FREE 1-800 227-2600 OTWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P/L I 2.7'3 12.2' nIn WAILL WAL HIGH ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 CONSTRUCT 4' MAX. HIGH RETAINING WALL PER SEPARATE PERMIT 300 LF 2 -- EA 3 CONSTRUCT a CONCRETE OVER 6• AN SUBCRADE PER SOIL REPORT 1.826 SF 4 CONSTRUCT a THICKNESS CONCRETE SIDEWALK 516 BE 5 -- F 6 �. .. -� .. UF 7 iVAk30000..,--. BAWCUT AND JOIN E%ISTNC CONCRETE 143 LF waw 15 ARUMUCAM ALVAPPBVL G.E. N0. 2504 land Design Consultant CIAuee..Fe. 1-1 AMERICAN T£OTECHNICA4 Hex:eo INC. mW.WXk.L WN 22125 CLO CANAL ROAD. / // •" / / / 1 CIVIL �.F YORBA LINDA. CA 92557 lEu(eu) eu-A,. P.(.)i TEL ]N -6B5 -39C0 W. A¢ Mafia WT I] OF TRACT ]05]0. IN TIE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. CA OYMER: HEN 2499 BRE IRRI DIAMOND ND RAIN WAY 00M 6 BAR. CA 09 CELL 6]14—]BB-5789 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE. OIAMOBD BAR. CA 01765 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RAM Bh CHECKED BY: ATE BY: 05/12/2017 REMSED BY: C-02 2 OF s SKEET DEMOLITION, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN _ 3 / �.0 .4• .Df .A5,Pr / i ' Y: /// ECt Y a„1 ��/� ♦ / y A ♦ / 3 V \ / /�Q, / ECI EC5 vvA� ll(�Illl�� Abel E NOTE r�amair.N 14EAREIT IGVmsREm,f CATCH e BA51N 10 Bc PR¢IECIE- PER CON TRGCIIGN BLIP 5E-10 GRAPHIC SCALE tLMm m1 - rt 'of 10 TRA(C T 3)678 ]VE3 /bj1-1-7-5 '\PIN @/10 -DID -012 r X" TRACT 306 API1 S7JD �1D IDVA\VA.� EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. STAND-BY CREW FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE AVAILA. AT ALL TIMES DURING ME RAINING SEASON OCTOBFA 15 TO APRIL 15. NECESSARY MATERIA SHALL BE AVAILABLE ONSI AND STOCKPILED ATC MNIENT LOCARONS TO INSUP THE RAPID CONSTRUCTIQY OF EMERGEN Y DEMCES A RESPONSIBLE IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCYF BEING NOTFlEO ATA 24 HOUR 2. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOW ON THIS PLAN MAY BE REMOVED WHEN APPROVED BY ME CITY ENGINEER IF ME GRACING OPERATION HAS PROGRESSED TO ME POINT WHERE THEY ME NO LONGER REWIRED. 3. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ME CITY Et{I NEER ALL DEMCES SHOWN ON THE PLM SHALL BE IN PLACE AT ME '�'dg OF E/bCH WORKING DAY OR ON WEEKENDS WHEN TIE 5 DAY RAIN PRO IUTY F RECAST ".S 0. 4. GRACED AREAS ADJACENT TO RLL SLOPES LOCATED AT TIE SITE ERCH VRU&C RAIN AWAY MGM THE TOP OF SLOPE AT TIE CONCLUSION OF 5. ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS WHICH 'MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFFSITE PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED MGM THE SIZE. 6. ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHAUI BE REMOVED FROM ALL DEVICES WTHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM ] A GUARD CSHALL BE POSTED ON ME SIZE WHENEVER ME BERM OF WATER PUMPED0DRY WMIN EXCEEDS HOURS AMR EACH RAINSTORM E DRAINED OR B. THE PLACE ENT OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE WITHIN THE SITE IS LEFT TO ME DISCRETION OF ME HOLD ENGINEER. 9. DESILTNG BASINS MAY NOT BE REMOVED OR MADE INOPERABLE BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15 WTHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF ME CITY ENGINEER. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL: TOLL FREE 1-800 227-2800 1W0 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ALL BMP. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIN MODEL BMP. MGM THE CALIFORNIA STORM WATER BMP HMOSOOK FOR CONSTRUCTION AT WWAV.CABMPHANDBOOKS.COM ECI CONSTRUCT GRAVEL RAG ER99M CONTROL ALONG WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY PROPERTY UNE EXCEPT DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. ME GRAVEL BAGS SHOULD BE 24- WOE AND 10' HIGH. MINIMUM PER DETAIL HEREON AND IN ACCORDANCE WM BMP FACTS SHEET )SE -6 AND /15E-8. EC2 CONSTRUCT MATERIALS STORAGE AREA IN ACCORDANCE WTH BMP FACTS SHEET (1.M-1. ECD CONSTRUCT SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT AREA IN ACCORDANCE WTH BMP FACTS SHEET /NM -9. ECD CONSTRUCT STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT AREA IN ACCORDANCE WTI BMP FACTS SHEET OMI -D. ECS CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WTH BMP FACTS SHEET /SE -1. A TWO 2) BAGS HOG TWO 2) BAGS WOE FINISH GRME FINISH GRADE A SECTION A -A NPICAL SECTITS TION — GRAVE BAG Eq \�teY'- - , APPROED GYGFDFCHNICMUMMERS BiAEMENi OF COMPUMCE q1T OF DIAMOND BAR OANO G UU D \ \ \ \ ♦ V \Yrr � qt _ �\Q"�' — \ LHAS BEEN RFl1ED THIS PM EN •• R.FE 4WST, DIT DIPNFFfl AND DEEMED TO OF IN COIIFMNMCE WIN _ /E, \ PLANS REMEMD BY: THE BEGpM ENDATDNS IN WR REPORT(S) DATED 01 09 201] PROJECT NO. \ a0. \ \ \ 5098-01 RENETy WAS UNITED TO THE CEOIECHNICA ASPECTS OF THE PLM \ \Ni4T T n`E \ \ 1 ^ \ !\ \ 1 r \ 1 \ HAT..RO ONLY. WE MAKE NO REPAESENTATON AS TO TIE ACCURACY OF TIE TION, OR MUSURE OF M DESIGLATMIS, OR MT PORTON OF TIE DESIGN. JON E. BOURGEOIS R.C.E. M424. M. 3/31/18 DATE 4 I / PIANO PREPARED BY" flEAENID BC MAT' Waw Land Design CUnsullanl 6 _ ARUMUCAM MVAPPIUAL BE. N0. 2501 AMERICAN GEOTECHNICAL. INC. D4 G.WmH,.Is"J RemAO 22725 OLD CANAL RDW, malmxLaw WB4 WN raven K A c uxoA.KIND sAR.)IIW-JR. Fuel.NOl / -/ �'OFCALtE lFL 714-68, CA -Y, / i TFiyN M". LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 17 OF TRACT 30578, IN TIE CITY OF DIAWOND BM. CA OWNER: MS. JOYCE CHER 2499 BRENNEN WAY DIAMOND BM, CA 91765 CE - 6714-388-5309 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DEMOLITION, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IN THE CRY OF DIAMOND BAR DRAWN B@ CHECKED BY: DATE BY: 05/12/2017 REVISED BY. C-03 3 OF 3 BEET PLANT PALETTE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME "COLS SIZE OUAMr1Y SLOPE PLANTING ®Muhlentheryw rigens Arlenisiu Canyon Grey Arwlio. ramp ... a ©O Ceonothusgride us M1zo onnlolis DRIVE ENTRY PLANTING ®QLmondub slaechas'Otto OaaatC pmetes bicolor Y Bar. Hybrid 'Red' FOUNDATION PLANTING O ©Ro... roan, 'Hunlinglan Carpel' L ... ndula sloechos 'Olio OumO' Oeovgoimilleo 'Barberry Ice' Q Noe Soioto (Did.. Y­ Wash,man Bl Coke viminalJohn' JOM1 Deer Graea 1,C)" 5 GALLON III Sage B-1, LOW 1 MLON 109 Three An LOW I Q Gkl al CarneI Caper LOW 5 GMLON 45 Ott. Oumll Lavender LOW 5 CMAON 79 Fortnight Lily LOW 5 GALLON 59 Everyreen Carpel Rote MODERATE 5 GALLON 66 Rosemary LOW 5 GALLON 11 Ott. aero Lavender LOW 5 GALLON 15 Roper,y Ice Bougornvaleo LOW 5 COULON 6 Coral Noe LOW 5 GALLON 25 Dille John Bottle Smith LOW 5 GALLON 7 Hybrid Yucca LOW 5 GALLON 10 SITE AREA AND NOTES PROPERTY AREA: /1,700 S.F. HAROSCAPE: 11,1177 S.F. POOL: 51111 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 1,256 S.F. LANDSCAPE: 27.979 S.F. (67; OF SITE) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL COMPLY YOTH THE WATER CONSERVATION LANDSCAPING REOUIREMENTS PER ORDINANCE NO. 01(2016). ALL UPOSED PORTIONS OF RETNNINO AND FREESTANDING WALIS SHALL BE STUCCOED TO MATCH THE RESIDENCE. TOTAL SHRUBS: GM 5 GALLON SHRUBS: NL 70% 1 GALLON SHRUBS: 190 JOS NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR PLANTER AND SITE DIMENSIONS, WALL AND NOTE: A PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MMNATAINED MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF DBMC SECTION 22.22.130 AS WELL ASAB1881 STATE WATER REDUCTION ORDINANCE. I Ceanolhus griseus hori2onNlis-Carmel Campm Ansddapurperea-Thin Awn ArlemMa'CarryonGrey - Sage Bmsh Bougelnallea ft ellNry Ise' CaTBtemon viminafis 3GLOe John' Aloe sbiata - Coral Aloe Oletes biodor - FoRnlght UN CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN tAOGJOBk 181001.01 N Smle: 1'= 20' 0 1tl 20 IG Iavendula slarchas'Oho Ouasg - Lavender Rosa Hybrid - Red Carpet Rase Rasmannus'Hungng Carpet -Rosemary CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 Yusea'Bdght Edge' Muhlenbergla doers - Deer Grass I SITE PLAN LEGEND I 0 OIDRIGWNLIONMrN ® maNIOI6TMeawuLTSwLw ILWIaTMItawN1 — NwwvsrwLTwl.xmBE N6A9WIRCCIFYAMIWNN4RIINM 6NMHNYCilMF11BeLN9WY1gfNi1lef/CWICNEIIgVflACII41f9HifQ13WeTBE11Nl9pI11EfPFW5E8MeWN65FNP1MN5Cq WA9lW IFS.gEEWF$$S01�YL®a1116 [PAXMiIIM R/NI$2flRFN11kT4Y/AW AR0.4W:IMW MIgCINI✓AI OILY MUH61AlFL(IOtlVNf£ LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A 38TOWTEMPLEAVFNUESUITE181 I POMONA ICADFOIVIRD1700 TELOOG.am.1010 www".NET muoeARoapha Rd7IllPo9116MfBe10 N)RIHeYMnMbwgNhnOnsbbLL}ibysPw'a�6lyNhw6MnsMGeLiwe W IaemeW praymmeR'graYa H. aminapaiSV Asry Mdnpmxlgblb/MMN t n EXISTING GARAGE PLAN �l EXISTING FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN n EXISTING SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN srn TING scnlEare'=ra LJ scuF:lm=ra EXISTING GARAGE, FIRST, AND SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Scale: 11W 1%W 0 S 9 10 CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 W4MY]I45.fUMMM11lWAWi9A1M15 &.JAHIAELNIGemI�l A�9 VAYNOIRIECIM:IWLfQtlX11Si ICIWLM.`MI[Ip WNPFY@31mp1TF@9HS. AV �fY5f11fAIpe4 CW WANA'RFSA9EE%AYS`®g11W11®811X4RU1N11M9RW I9 igIG1fM P£YFWA'O }Abd4TAYl0.gl<MTYJMp1YMW 6£6KfNgKY]E LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A WYOW.I MAVENUE,SUUIM I PO W IC/OLFO 91700 mm..m.1010 WW.".NEf ©uap 1ww.m tlIlA1LNtl115PE30M0 MRIbMnYmYmeM.�hrYnMY.Ajlb�jmhe'CV.'�YINtl W&�nMCb'4ibM W 6MnTWIAgaY= W wiHaupwN MYMNNnymvh{YEyN.4rNe1 I \\ 1 I II I 1 19 I II II I I II I I 11 DEMOLITION FLOOR PLANS D GARAGE DEMOLITION PLAN sruE:Ire'=ry Scale: 11S' =1'•0' 0 0 C 16 m n SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION PIAN ` SCALE IJ'=1'-0' CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 DEMOLITION KEYNOTES 1O a;umE�saanwx� Omsu.E sanroiumswaur®mruwrwnoxumsrvovrmnax. ssvaccrnxor.�xwrs. Oa<svxonrvunanEooue O revvxwmmrcmewnw.wro.woxwnmsruunouu ravwmv wmwxrxamwurrowauw Oxm'.f wmm0vmn0ws Osavhwuummm�wwosn � mmwowuwce O,unmawnnoxamwonmw 10 ouwu�rf aisxiummnw.w DEMOLITION PLAN LEGEND 0 .Wams ® msxcrnwswww.romrui C_______7 msnnwxsnarmaxroeEwsa�m weisons.mm>onmv7woaurrs semi.wEwxc�uuuuwr�nrreucrrnmtmuiuxsumwmrmpxs�ra[rssnmamEvnaaasw�uaen�rrruan wmunrs.wewusemonnwim m� oruxxnmsn.w uwnaExr wrewunuaacmiwgwuruxamruuuuar0rroawpe LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. T A WOWIE UAFINE.SM lffi I MW lCAllFOSN1A0170 To-fiO w.10t0 ww".Na ©uog,fmprn mir.u�urmsvE.mw xo�cm•r..nsn.maPbn,w.w..pan.gwrso orsnbn«wsum,.naurmwrwmmrnAr+w�'w�•n w •nuicvpvNnpuy WOn%.nvkFINbMNEiC GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AND ADDITION CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 DMwwaRm�axamwwxummwms smm.wF wramuum urrtio7�[crianwcan�vrs.wmwwxvms�usreErewmmwemuursxommtswrnnonsan w.w¢wirsuaomss®onlwumerroewwramsn.wwronaertvmwuo w�wcnavwlwPunaaarunssa.clraawwr. LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A N70W.I PIEAVE F,SMEIBI I PWAOM IMFOMR917M TEL009.AW1010 WWW.LWG.NEP 0u0.p, urty,m 911NLBSMSPESd1H1 IME1MWomba.mvpW hrW. wl..gnn.i+„.w pn0.yusswxc„wcr, rwt wwmxmApwrow'+'4'roPa+ xe w..� nw=Braaw0e.�.B.„.�Mmxrat DOOR SCHEDULE RRA# WE CID 26'X S -B` m T-0'XB-B' m 2-0' X &-A- C33 G'-0'XT-B'SLIDER m 0'-0'X0'-O'SLIDER O 0'-0'XT-0`GARAGEDOOR WINDOW SCHEDULE WIN" WWOOWGDE TrE (WAMHEIGHRRWGHOPENING ©I &-0X*W © G-WXS-4' © 5'-0'X4'-0' CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES F isxexOxmuwwx� Q D�snmremenwu�roPFwry F31 � ❑4 1.>•wwxrnREsrusxmNuwnu ❑G iexPnwwvw.u<vnvwcEmsauwaws Q Iexwnourmrawrwxrue OIkW NINAIEIEP.11pgIpSlY! ❑e �4r LEGEND 0 msmowuirouPue� � DumoPnuwawuimuuw iewmwi0wu� � �vmxsimcirox.xwae DMwwaRm�axamwwxummwms smm.wF wramuum urrtio7�[crianwcan�vrs.wmwwxvms�usreErewmmwemuursxommtswrnnonsan w.w¢wirsuaomss®onlwumerroewwramsn.wwronaertvmwuo w�wcnavwlwPunaaarunssa.clraawwr. LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. A N70W.I PIEAVE F,SMEIBI I PWAOM IMFOMR917M TEL009.AW1010 WWW.LWG.NEP 0u0.p, urty,m 911NLBSMSPESd1H1 IME1MWomba.mvpW hrW. wl..gnn.i+„.w pn0.yusswxc„wcr, rwt wwmxmApwrow'+'4'roPa+ xe w..� nw=Braaw0e.�.B.„.�Mmxrat i I wm ROOF PLAN scuE:lre•=ra 8 8 DEM# SIZE m u m zsxwav CD za•xwa m w-0'Xe--SUDER CD ,4 OD VA XTOGARAGEDOOH -. I ----- YANDOWSM IVPE I f�r�,ro�P�DS I ® VWX54• II, II ©4 w4rx rV CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES �1 FLW1YM310'Al91wNL Q fxislwora,www.usrosrvax w f� ® �I I]5 irtwu,uaww.w.Fuvuzfuxduwsxss © imNww>WvrRwuiwoPx I xmaxac�vu,ameunx III. �N£N Li WI Ca G£IEPPoFLiE LEGEND `I£N �I. NI �LiF1EFGY.RE B ... .- --- _ p15�EX5iPGP(U'f � _ �L':1Yll, YN LIX:CFEIFflGW 111E artnfnsrn,GFGGf - I pRP d15TW 0.CG � i I - $ �LL � �I� 9� BALCONY BELOW i � I I 0 0 0 o i ' i I wm ROOF PLAN scuE:lre•=ra 8 6 6 Aav D R11T LEVEL FLOOR PLAN scuE: tre•=ra FIRST LEVEL FLOOR ADDITION AND ROOF PLAN IAMJOB*: 1810[¢.01 I N sDaB: tre =ra A-07 WAMWIAYBELOW CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 DOOR SCHEDULE DEM# SIZE m u m zsxwav CD za•xwa m w-0'Xe--SUDER CD o -o �L 6 6 Aav D R11T LEVEL FLOOR PLAN scuE: tre•=ra FIRST LEVEL FLOOR ADDITION AND ROOF PLAN IAMJOB*: 1810[¢.01 I N sDaB: tre =ra A-07 WAMWIAYBELOW CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 w�aerxx m:evmnoxunwPuers aam�uemirosnwuovarr:mFwarF>;nw.w'mwxs..'ciuumonarske,esrenmaml wumwiESAxwuasruGFuwsemrasrexvxu,xswwe rwcuvsrrcsxwAwanswGww mGrowmavaAr.wG eswfa,Gsw,Pce. LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. T A 387GW.TEMPIEAVENOE, SODS 193 O.W POMONA I MRNIA 91768 TELMMM0.1010 WWW.LADO.NET ©uw.w,ean.m zvu�.mnausarcn EGD:msmmu.nfmw.'eve..w..+#aew.mwwavvwm,wa.+.,.w,vemnmeakmmmawnwm w1( me..ay.a a.pManpNaF..atybMlAu DOOR SCHEDULE DEM# SIZE m zaxwa m zsxwav CD za•xwa m w-0'Xe--SUDER CD BVXM-SUDEN OD VA XTOGARAGEDOOH WINDOW SCHEDULE WNW YANDOWSM IVPE (IDTHXHEIGn RODGHOPENING ©i w -0'X4'41' ® VWX54• ® 5'-0'X4'0 ©4 w4rx rV CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES �1 FLW1YM310'Al91wNL Q fxislwora,www.usrosrvax w f� ® MrNaxu�iesruurmxiwmu I]5 irtwu,uaww.w.Fuvuzfuxduwsxss © imNww>WvrRwuiwoPx ❑7 xmaxac�vu,ameunx ❑e xewaxc�,earrvnwur LEGEND 0 mmrowu„Gwvnw � vnmrGFGnw�cw.w.ror,Euw Prxvnuaswui - eewarsiwsiw-wsE w�aerxx m:evmnoxunwPuers aam�uemirosnwuovarr:mFwarF>;nw.w'mwxs..'ciuumonarske,esrenmaml wumwiESAxwuasruGFuwsemrasrexvxu,xswwe rwcuvsrrcsxwAwanswGww mGrowmavaAr.wG eswfa,Gsw,Pce. LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. T A 387GW.TEMPIEAVENOE, SODS 193 O.W POMONA I MRNIA 91768 TELMMM0.1010 WWW.LADO.NET ©uw.w,ean.m zvu�.mnausarcn EGD:msmmu.nfmw.'eve..w..+#aew.mwwavvwm,wa.+.,.w,vemnmeakmmmawnwm w1( me..ay.a a.pManpNaF..atybMlAu @NOHTH ELEVATION s�:1le'IIw MATERIALS: xex0srMwowNLxm,uiumatFNUTPue,m wm,ge�xonxvumnuu, vMr NG'FS,90.q[U91fM5,91 XFNNO]IlfAttilB]�V 8 wm,uwPuwrexTunn; run. vun. PNs,vu u,evanLvlw,rNAnm R ® mauanoo0nawmwe NM. M BG.`R2IEPOCf 10E a GWE WT %0.1L6VY8G4l-6WtSl4GG1Mw&F10 E9aouvosTvwwwuNwcw.,av mPar:aurua0x a.asr ee eaatvnamxivcxvannu B rowuneNxauNwM emN:auuttsoxe.uuEu, Gxr B Waoocmeva BeTGwnMsoMFnmGa BJRY'(roY4WA1Bp4d PNIi EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS UBGJOB#: 101002.01 vravaiT scale: UB'=1'-0' F1 WEST ELEVATION srei c va'=rNr , xex0srMwowNLxm,uiumatFNUTPue,m wm,ge�xonxvumnuu, vMr fNarvuuiuNuwutwnxuwuTceW rnmnnMa fW9110 wiO1fIISRlGfl/$IGIf%14AF, PAPR 29 .4.NCMISG&LI WNL f TOwTWPN4,MiNI61GlEMw[PNM CHEN RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MR. AND MRS. CHEN 2522 STEEPLECHASE LANE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 MANUFACTURER AND COLOR: Bmiaxrowrtrvouatmwxns.mwo.xtuva ewunrowmiwawmwxros.uweu.xwu i8f,1CM h 9 0wl!N TWafma,xONu n utv:v� mPovawucesu n eery aaMwru.wuwwm W Nmwwns svm,uecarca,uu.NuwrwruxnrmMuaruiuxsuTiwmonnxsuusrcerenm W mePeeusEs,a renesenemuG wuMama7Net�wPFssm W Mn®MmsauxvumswNcePW aenr�wuuNNlwGFf.NfAClpNMVI aauoceaeNGro WNnc LADG I LA Design Group, Inc. T A 3MW..lE MAVENOE,sOREIM I MMONA ICALIFORNLA917M 1E1:MM.1010 WMY.UOG.NEF muosyirvwpm sonNLNWrsxsmrtn xorelreeLonemnwnpdnne.,wewdm.awe+.w�0wuiwwwm��setsx*e+Mnaw.rrm�++M'amnmwewan w .niwwv>..d..d.que.reymv,N.ugr+Nvaw PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.3 MEETING DATE: August 8, 2017 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program — Planning Case No. PL 2016-161 PROJECT LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT: PROPERTY OWNER: 205 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8717-008-005, 006) General Commercial Regional Commercial (C-3) Lorraine Fortelka McDonald's Corporation One McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60523 APPLICANT: Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Architecture 3600 Birch Street, Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting the approval of a Development Review (DR) to demolish and reconstruct an existing McDonald's fast food restaurant building and renovate the property. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes and a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) to establish sign criteria for all on -premise signage are also being requested. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program No. PL2016-161, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Chapters 22.48, 22.58, and 22.36.060, subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject property is a 0.69 gross acre lot, located on the southwest corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Gentle Springs Lane, which is a private street. The site is currently developed with a 2,489 square -foot McDonald's fast food restaurant building which was constructed in 1975. The project is adjacent to the former Kmart property, which was in operation from 1975 to 2014. On October 11, 2016, the Planning Commission approved a package of entitlements to renovate the former Kmart property. The project, currently under construction, includes the conversion of the former Kmart building into a multi -tenant retail space with Sprouts and Ross Dress For Less as the anchors. Other improvements include an addition to the existing building, and a new, freestanding restaurant building to accommodate a drive-thru Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf, as well as a Chipotle Mexican Grill with on-site beer and wine service. Plans for a second drive-thru building for The Habit Burger Grill were submitted in July 2017 and will be reviewed by the Commission on an upcoming agenda. This commercial center will be known as "Diamond Bar Ranch." The subject property shares reciprocal parking and access with Diamond Bar Ranch and the "Diamond Bar Plaza" center currently anchored by Ken's Ace Hardware and AutoZone. A 76 gas station and a Walnut Valley Water District pump station are also within the immediate vicinity, but these two properties are not included in the reciprocal parking and access agreement. Site Aerial (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Photo of Existing Building Project Description: The applicant is proposing to completely demolish the existing McDonald's building and site improvements in order to facilitate a ground -up redevelopment of the subject property. Project plans are included as Attachment 2. The requested entitlements are summarized below: • Development Review (architectural and site plan design review of the proposed site improvements). The key components of the Development Review application are as listed below: 1. Demolition of the existing 2,489 square -foot McDonald's fast food restaurant building and the construction of a new 3,746 square -foot building. 2. Reconstruction of the parking lot, including resurfacing and striping, new lighting, landscaping and accessibility upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Conditional Use Permit. The applicant requests CUP approval to provide side-by- side (dual) drive-thru service lanes for the proposed fast food restaurant that wraps around the proposed building. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 3 of 16 Comprehensive Sign Program. The applicant is required to establish design criteria for all exterior on -premise signage. The applicant has thus submitted a proposed Comprehensive Sign Program as part of the overall project. Site and Surrounding General Plan. Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Site Plan The overall layout of the project site remains similar to the existing, in that the new building will be constructed in the approximate location of its predecessor, and all existing locations of drive approaches will remain. The current McDonald's restaurant occupies the center of the site with two full access driveways on Diamond Bar Boulevard and two secondary access locations at the rear of the site adjacent to Diamond Bar Ranch. Key modifications to the site plan are summarized and illustrated below: PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 4 General Plan Designation Zoning Landes Us Site General Commercial C-3 Fast Food Restaurant (Rebuild) North General Commercial C-3 Fast Food Restaurant, Tire Center South General Commercial C-3 Retail, Restaurants, Personal Services East General Commercial C-3 Retail, Service Stations, Restaurants West General Commercial C-3 Restaurants, Motel Site Plan The overall layout of the project site remains similar to the existing, in that the new building will be constructed in the approximate location of its predecessor, and all existing locations of drive approaches will remain. The current McDonald's restaurant occupies the center of the site with two full access driveways on Diamond Bar Boulevard and two secondary access locations at the rear of the site adjacent to Diamond Bar Ranch. Key modifications to the site plan are summarized and illustrated below: PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 4 Site Plan • The existing parking lot will be reconfigured from a perpendicular layout to an angled layout. There are 35 existing parking spaces on site. A total of 19 parking spaces are proposed with the renovation. • On-site circulation will be reconfigured to provide for one-way travel instead of the existing two-way travel for the primary driveway closest to Gentle Springs Lane. Vehicles will no longer be able to enter the site from the westerly driveway nearest to Gentle Springs Lane. The proposed travel pattern reduces the number of on-site vehicle conflicts by directing all traffic in the same direction. The southerly driveway will remain as a one-way travel lane. • ADA improvements include a delineated walkway connecting the Diamond Bar Boulevard sidewalk to the building, access to the trash enclosure, as well as ADA parking. The play area is proposed to be removed. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 5 of 16 A maximum 42 -inch high retaining wall with a stone veneer finish will be constructed along the north side property line adjacent to Gentle Springs Lane (a 42 -inch maximum high protective fencing will be constructed on top of the retaining wall to accommodate for the grade difference between the subject property and Gentle Springs Lane). As these walls and fencing will be visible from public view, a condition of approval is included in the attached resolution to require the railing to be decorative as well. FINISH SURFACE FLOW LINE CONL' RIBBON GUTTER�j I I SLOPE J0.29' ASPHALT CONCRETE TRENCH 0„)0 CIASS 11 AR SPRINGS LANOSCAPt PROTECTIVE RAILING (ON TOP OF WALL) (HT=42') CONC CURS PROPERTY/RETAINING WALL (SEE C -Jo & C' -/h) SLOPE TT �HT=47"MAX '-(E) CURB & GUTTER '-(E) LANDSCAPE (E) SCREEN/RETAINING MiI 1.0' COMPACTEO FILL ANO/OR RLCOMPACTEO .SUPGRAOL 1$N I'INAL SOILS REPORT Section of Retaining Wall and Protective Fencing The frontage at Diamond Bar Boulevard will be improved with streetscape elements including enhanced paving, post and rail, tree grates, etc., which will be similar to the enhanced streetscape elements recently installed along Grand Avenue and Diamond Canyon Park. ANALYSIS: The following analysis sets forth the foundation for the Findings of Fact contained in the attached resolution. Together, the analysis and findings provide the basis for staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission approve the Project and all of its components, subject to the conditions set forth in the approval resolution. Development Review (D13MC Chapter 22.48) Consistency with Development Code Standards Staff has reviewed the proposed project and found it to be consistent with the development standards for commercial development in the C-3 zone. The following table provides a summary code analysis for the foundational development standards: PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 6 of 16 Development Standard ... -. Front Setback from Right -of -Way (Landscaped) 10' 10'-10" Yes Side Setback None 46'-11" Yes Street Side Setback 10' 109'-2" Yes Rear Setback None 26'-9" Yes Building Height Limit 35' 21'-4" Yes Parking* 13 spaces 19 spaces Yes Drive-thru Lane Width 12' 12' Yes Drive-thru Lane Interior Turning Radius 10' 15' Yes The parking requirement for 50,000+ square -foot shopping centers is applied to the McDonald's building in conjunction with Diamond Bar Ranch, at a ratio of 1/300 square feet [DBMC Section 22.30.040 Table 3 10]. Site and Grading Configuration The site is located on an existing building pad. The applicant is proposing to extend the buildable pad to accommodate the parking spaces and driveways. The applicant is proposing to cut 30 cubic yards of soil towards the east side of the property (near Diamond Bar Boulevard) and fill 280 cubic yards of soil towards the north side (near Gentle Springs Lane). Therefore, 250 cubic yards of soil will have to be imported to the site. Architecture The architect has designed the new building with a contemporary architectural style. The proposed building includes the following design features: • Vintagewood cedar (faux wood) accent material at the front entrances; • Black Eurowest E -wood, which is a type of porcelain tile with a wood appearance at the entry arcade and brand walls; • Coronado stone veneer at the base of the building; • Medium sand finish stucco; • A clear anodized aluminum storefront system with clear glass; • Metal canopy; and • Metal fascia band/trim. Vertical score lines are also utilized to create patterns on the blank wall surfaces. A white metal canopy further enhances the contemporary style. Overall, interest is provided by variations in materials, colors, textures and details. The maximum height of the building is 21'-4". PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 7 of 16 While the rear and south (drive-thru) elevations do not have glass and branding elements as the other fagade areas do, a darker brown plaster tone (Tatami Tan) is introduced to create a contrast to the beige "Whole Wheat" plaster to create visual interest. The design theme is compatible with the proposed Diamond Bar Ranch center. Although not a replica of the renovated buildings in the center, the McDonald's building will utilize similar design elements, materials, and colors to fit in with the overall contemporary theme of the center. m McDonald's rc ISO East (Front) Elevation (View from Diamond Bar Blvd.) Welcome Ff North Elevation (View from Gentle Springs Lane) m pZ __�__- West (Rear) Elevation PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 8 of 16 South Elevation (Drive-Thru Side) Staff is recommending enhancements to the building's north elevation due to its visibility from Gentle Springs Lane and to mitigate the blank wall surface and create visual interest with additional architectural details. Staff proposed the illustration below to depict one modest example of how the north elevation could be enhanced. In this example, the area around the service doors is detailed with Vintagewood cedar accent material and a black metal canopy to mimic the design elements around the drive-thru windows. A design approach such as this is consistent with the manner in which other building access points are detailed. A condition of approval is included in the attached resolution requiring the incorporation of design features on the north elevation to express the design intent of staff's recommendation. E. ME - MEiPL CpPW!' q/91FH BIALK EUPOWE6T ♦ SMFPWYJ PMS '. VIIIIXE S- - L Proposed Modification to North Elevation (View from Gentle Springs Lane) Landscape Plans Very minimal landscaping exists on the site currently, and there are no protected trees. Landscaping will be enhanced by adding trees, shrubs, and groundcover around the perimeter of the site. Landscaping is used to provide buffer from the street and to provide shade for parking cars. The landscape plan proposes 18 new trees, primarily along the perimeter landscaped areas of the property. All trees will be 24 -inch box, with the exception of three 36 -inch box trees and consist of Chitalpa and African sumac. A variety of shrubs and groundcovers are included in the proposed planting plan. The proposed palette is comprised of climate -appropriate varieties, including kangaroo paw, atlas fescue, India hawthorne, yellow lantana, silverberry, fortnight lily, and dwarf bottlebrush. All plant types will be drought tolerant and non-invasive species. The project PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) is required to comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance, which will be verified during building plan check and final inspections. To help soften the massing of the building's north elevation and mitigate the long unbroken wall plane, a condition of approval has been added to plant an additional tree in the planter area adjacent to the ADA parking. A slightly smaller tree was suggested by the applicant's landscape architect due to the physical constraints and viability within that area. Staff recommends a minimum 15 -gallon Chitalpa tree be planted in the planter adjacent to the ADA parking spaces, and this condition of approval has been added to the attached resolution. I nor )/NVNI Exterior Liahtinq MCDONALD'S APPROX, 3,746 SF V M Proposed Modification to Landscape Plan Additional Tree J to be Planted Existing parking lot light poles and building mounted exterior lighting within the subject property will be replaced with new LED lighting. The new parking lot light poles are proposed to be 20 -feet tall. The design and color will match the parking light poles at Diamond Bar Ranch, and has been included as a condition of approval in the attached resolution. All lighting will be shielded to prevent light spill and specular glare. Per DBMC Section 22.16.050 (b), lighting will provide a minimum one footcandle of illumination at the ground throughout the parking area and walkways. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 10 of 16 Parking As mentioned above, the project site shares reciprocal parking and access with the neighboring parcels that include the Diamond Bar Ranch center as well as the Diamond Bar Plaza center. Due to the reconfiguration of the parking lots at Diamond Bar Ranch and McDonald's, a condition of approval has been added to amend the existing reciprocal parking and access agreement with the associated parties. With an amended agreement in place, the parking requirement for shopping centers over 50,000 square feet is applied to the McDonald's project site in conjunction with the Diamond Bar Ranch and the Diamond Bar Plaza center. At 3,746 square feet, 13 parking spaces are required for McDonalds, at a ratio of 1/300 square feet [DBMC Section 22.30.040 Table 3-10]. With the 19 parking spaces proposed, the project has a surplus of parking spaces on site. City's Development Code Parking Requirement Use Sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Parking Required Parking Provided McDonald's 3,746 1/300 sq. ft. 13 19 Diamond Bar Ranch Shopping Center 100,735 1/300 sq. ft. 336 344 (new Sprouts center) Diamond Bar Plaza 31,418 1/250 sq. ft. 126 211 Shopping Center Crossfit Fitness 3,000 1/150 sq. ft. 20 Facility Dance School 1,980 1/150 sq. ft. 15 Total i 510 574 Staff reviewed the application and determined that a separate traffic and parking analysis would not be required because the proposed project is a replacement of the same use and would be negligible. In addition, the parking supply and vehicle queuing capacity is adequate and can accommodate the proposed rebuild. Conditional Use Permit Request (DBMC Chapter 22.58) A CUP is required for uses whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined before being analyzed for suitability at a particular location. The C-3 zone requires approval of a CUP for drive-thru facilities. When reviewing a CUP, consideration is given to the location, design, configuration, operational characteristics and potential impacts to determine whether or not the proposed use will pose a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare. If it can be found that the proposed use is likely to be compatible with its surroundings, the PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 11 of 16 Commission may approve the proposed use subject to conditions stipulating the manner in which the use must be conducted. If the Commission finds that the proposed use is likely to be detrimental to the general peace, health and general welfare, then it must deny the request. When a CUP is approved, it runs with the land and all conditions placed on the CUP are binding on all successors in interest. In other words, if the owners of McDonald's were to close the business after it has begun operating, a new tenant could locate in the space and operate the same service. The new tenant would be required to comply with the same conditions as the previous tenant and would not be permitted to modify the drive- thru facility without full review and approval by the Planning Commission. A CUP is requested for drive-thru facilities to make sure that the design and operation of the facility effectively mitigates problems of traffic, congestion, excessive pavement, litter, noise, and unsightliness. Drive-Thru Service Side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes are proposed for the reconstructed fast food restaurant. The proposed rebuild will implement many of the current McDonald's design improvements such as replacing the existing outdated kitchen model with a newer, more efficient layout and the introduction of side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes. These planned changes are consistent with ongoing efforts to improve service for McDonald's restaurants through a combination of building and design changes. The addition of side- by-side (dual) order boards enables the restaurant to increase car stacking in a condensed area at the back of the building, improve parking and on-site circulation, while optimizing operations. The proposed drive-thru use is located within a commercial corridor occupied by retail stores, sit-down and drive-thru restaurants, service stations and other consumer services with varied days and hours of operation; as such, the surrounding built environment is an appropriate setting for the proposed use. Drive-Thru Lane and On -Site Circulation Staff requested a circulation study to evaluate existing on-site circulation conditions and verify that the proposed drive-thru use has appropriate vehicle queuing capacity to accommodate the peak on-site drive-thru demands for the facility, design and location. A Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation conducted by Urban Crossroads, Inc., was reviewed by the City's Traffic Consultant (Sasaki Transportation Services) and is included as Attachment 3. Driveways - The existing driveway counts suggest that most vehicles enter the site from the primary driveway on Diamond Bar Boulevard near Gentle Springs Lane. The proposed layout restricts this existing full access driveway (inbound/outbound) to inbound only. This approach favors entering traffic and expedites the rapid movement of traffic from the street to the facility avoiding vehicle queues on public roadway. In addition, the one-way travel pattern facilitates an angled parking stall orientation, which is proposed. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 12 of 16 While some vehicles currently access the drive-thru lane from Gentle Springs Lane, this driveway location will be restricted to outbound only. The proposed travel pattern reduces the number of on-site vehicle conflicts by directing all traffic in the same direction. Drive-Thru - The report looks at estimated parking demand using both the queue vehicles per square feet and per seat ratios. Based on this formula, the estimated drive-thru queue is 12 vehicles. The site plan suggests that the drive-thru lanes will provide stacking (when measured from the order pickup window) for approximately 12 vehicles with additional on-site backup overflow capacity of approximately three vehicles, as shown on the following exhibit. Therefore, if 12 vehicles were queued, the proposed drive-thru configuration would be able to accommodate the peak vehicle demands on-site within the planned drive-thru lane capacity. The analysis suggests that there is sufficient capacity on-site to allow unimpeded traffic from Diamond Bar Boulevard to enter the site. Truck Deliveries - With the size constraints of the property, truck deliveries are expected to take place on-site during off-peak hours. Three stalls will be reserved using cones during off-peak times to facilitate truck deliveries, as shown on the following exhibit. It is expected that the truck deliveries will continue to take place during off-peak hours when staff is available to process and receive deliveries. McDonald's will coordinate deliveries during off-peak hours (12:00 a.m.-7:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. -5:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m. -12:00 p.m.) when staff is available and parking is not impacted. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 13 of 16 ►.. I _ _ Order jJ I Board #1 -0 I �I 11 I I I I\ WDONALDS APPROX. 3,746 SF / 1 I Pickup Window J I I I I Ci Order Board #2 Additional On -Site Vehicle Storage 5 Truck Delivery Area N Site Layout With Vehicle Queuing Capacity Comprehensive Sian Program (DBMC Section 22.36.060) The Development Code requires a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) whenever five or more signs are proposed for a new or existing development. The purpose of a CSP is to integrate a project's signs with the design of the structures to achieve a unified architectural statement [DBMC 22.36.060(a)]. The proposed CSP is included in Attachment 2. The following signs are proposed: • One wall sign at the east (front) elevation; • Four logos on all four elevations; • "Welcome" lettering on top of the metal canopy above the building entrance; • "Pick l In" anrt "Pnv Hprp" dirpctinnal cinnc fnr drive-thni c.Luctnmprc• and Menu boards, ordering canopies, and driveway clearance signs. PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 14 of 16 An existing monument sign is located at the Diamond Bar Boulevard frontage, near the northerly drive approach. This monument sign is proposed to be retained but shall be refurbished to match the architecture of the new building. A condition of approval has been included in the attached resolution. All wall signs are proposed to be individual channel letters and internally illuminated. Parkway Streetscape Improvements The City awarded a design contract to install streetscape improvements along Diamond Bar Boulevard, between Golden Springs Drive and the freeway ramps, utilizing thematic elements established along Grand Avenue, and at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. A condition of approval has been included to require the applicant to pay a fair -share contribution to the City for improvements along the McDonald's frontage including enhanced paving, post and rail, tree grates, etc. The fair - share cost, based on the engineer's estimate included as Exhibit A to the attached resolution, is $120,498.24. Consistencv with Citvwide Desian Guidelines The applicant has worked closely with staff to ensure that the project is consistent with Diamond Bar's Citywide Design Guidelines. It is staff's opinion that the project successfully captures the spirit and intent of the Design Guidelines. In addition to conforming to the minimum development standards prescribed for the C-3 zoning district, the project will significantly upgrade the aesthetics of the subject property by updating the McDonald's building to a more contemporary and inviting new storefront. The parking lot will also be more inviting by incorporating trees and landscaping. Notable elements of the project design which address the Citywide Design Guidelines include, among other things, the following: • Building design is compatible with surrounding development and reflects community character while suggesting uniqueness and quality; • The proposed building orientation respects the surrounding buildings and orientation of surrounding streets; • The building design relates to the community character; • The architectural treatment of the building extends to all visible sides and parapet walls are treated as an integral part of the building design; • The scale of the building is compatible with, not necessarily the same as, adjacent buildings; and PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 15 of 16 There is variation of scale, pattern and texture of the building and landscaping elements to encourage a more visually interesting project. Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their conditions are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the subject property, and published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on July 28, 2017. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff did not receive any comments in opposition to the Project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15302(b) (replacement or reconstruction) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: Mayuko Nakajima Associate Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: _ WIN -7JW9 -tPlai-ifer Draft Resolution No. 2017 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation Dated July 5, 2017 3. Color and Material Board 4. Demolition Plan, Site Plan, Circulation Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Roof Plans, Conceptual Grading Plans, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plans and Comprehensive Sign Program PL 2016-161 (205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) Page 16 of 16 Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING PLANNING CASE NO. PL2016-161, A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 3,746 SQUARE -FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE SIDE- BY-SIDE (DUAL) DRIVE-THRU SERVICE LANES; AND COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM TO ESTABLISH SIGN CRITERIA FOR A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 S. DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8717-008-005 AND 006 OR "Subject Property"). A. RECITALS 1. The property owner, Lorraine Fortelka, McDonald's Corporation, and applicant, Jessica Steiner, Bickel Group Architecture, has filed an application for Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program No. PL2016-161 to request the following approvals from the Planning Commission: (a) Development Review: i. Demolish the existing 2,489 square -foot McDonald's fast food restaurant building, and reconstruct a new 3,746 square -foot fast food restaurant. ii. Renovation of the parking lot, including resurfacing and striping, new lighting, landscaping and accessibility upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). (b) Conditional Use Permit to establish side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes for the proposed fast food restaurant. (c) Comprehensive Sign Program to establish design criteria for all exterior on - premise signage. The requested approvals described above shall be collectively referred to in this Resolution as the "Project." 2. The Subject Property is comprised of two parcels totaling 0.69 acre with a zoning designation of C-3 with an underlying General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. 3. The Subject Property is designated on the official maps of the Los Angeles County Assessor as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8717-008-005 and 006. 4. The City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the 1 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX 9 C. provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15302(b) (replacement or reconstruction) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required On July 28, 2017, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers, and public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Subject Property. Public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board and the notice was posted at three other locations within the project vicinity. 6. On August 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Project based on the findings and subject to the conditions set forth below. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Chapters 22.48, 22.58 and 22.36.060, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 1. Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) a. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, Citywide Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): In addition to conforming to the minimum development standards prescribed for the C-3 zoning district, the project will significantly upgrade the aesthetics of the subject property by updating the McDonald's building to a more contemporary and inviting new storefront. The parking lot will also be more inviting by incorporating trees and landscaping. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX Notable elements of the Project design which address the Citywide Design Guidelines include, among other things, the following.- Building ollowing. Building design is compatible with surrounding development and reflects community character while suggesting uniqueness and quality; • The proposed building orientation respects the surrounding buildings and orientation of surrounding streets; • The building design relates to the community character; • The architectural treatment of the building extends to all visible sides and parapet walls are treated as an integral part of the building design; • The scale of the building is compatible with, not necessarily the same as, adjacent buildings; and • There is variation of scale, pattem and texture of the building and landscaping elements to encourage a more visually interesting project. The Project site is not part of any theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards orplanned developments. However, the Project frontage will incorporate streetscape designs in the City's Streetscape Design Standards to install streetscape improvements along Diamond Bar Boulevard, between Golden Springs Drive and the freeway ramps. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: • The Project site and the adjacent contiguous parcel are already developed with commercial uses. Reciprocal parking and access easements between the Subject Property and neighboring uses currently exist and shall be amended to reflect current conditions. • On-site circulation will be improved by reconfiguration of the parking lot. A one-way travel lane is proposed instead of the existing two-way travel. The proposed travel pattern reduces the number of on-site vehicle conflicts by directing all traffic in the same direction. • The proposed side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes have adequate vehicle queuing length to accommodate the expected demand. In addition, the drive-thru lanes provides sufficient turning radii for customer vehicles to maneuver. • Accessibility upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is incorporated into the project. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX c. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan: The design theme of the building is compatible with the proposed adjacent commercial center, `Diamond Bar Ranch." Although nota replica ofthe center, the McDonald's building will utilize similar design elements, materials, and colors to fit in with the overall contemporary theme. d. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The overall composition of building form, use of materials and details are visually pleasing and harmonious. A varied palette of materials and details, including Vintagewood cedar, black Eurowest E -wood, Coronado stone veneer, medium sand finish stucco, clear,glass, metal canopies and fascia band/trim, and a coordinated color scheme will convey a sense of physical permanence, and style that will outlast short-lived design trends. Enhancing the landscaping throughout the Project site will further appeal to occupants, customers and passersby. e. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: The Project consists of the reconstruction of an existing commercial building and renovation of parking lot improvements. The land use will continue to be a fast food restaurant. Rather than posing a detriment to the public health, safety or welfare, the Project will more likely enhance the community's visual character and economic viability by transforming an outdated building into an attractive setting which will likely draw more customers. f. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Project is categorically exempt from CEQA as stated under Recital No. 4 of this Resolution. 2. Conditional Use Permit Review Findings for Drive-Thru Service (DBMC Section 22.58.040) a. The Proposed Use (i.e., side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service) is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a conditional use permit and 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code: Drive-thru facilities are permitted in the C-3 zoning district, subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The proposed drive-thru lane has been designed in compliance with the development standards for drive-through facilities set forth under DBMC Section 22.42.050. b. The Proposed Use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The Subject Property is located within the General Commercial General Plan land use designation. This land use designation is intended for regional, freeway -oriented, and/or community retail and service uses. An automobile - oriented use such as a restaurant with drive-thru service is clearly consistent with the intent of this land use designation. The Project is consistent with General Plan Strategy 1.3.3: ("Encourage neighborhood serving retail and service commercial uses') in that the proposed side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes will provide an additional convenience for customers, and will presumably increase sales for the business providing drive-thru service, as well as draw more customers. c. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the Proposed Use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity: The proposed side-by-side (dual) drive-thru lanes and the building to which is an ancillary use have been site planned, oriented and configured to enable orderly vehicular circulation to occur in a manner that does not materially interfere with the operations of other uses in the vicinity. The planned changes are consistent with ongoing efforts to improve service for McDonald's restaurants through a combination of building and design changes. The addition of side-by-side (dual) order boards enables the restaurant to increase car stacking in a condensed area at the back of the building, improve parking and on-site circulation, while optimizing operations. The proposed drive-thru use is located within a commercial corridor occupied by retail stores, sit-down and drive-thru restaurants, service stations and other consumer services with varied days and hours of operation; as such, the surrounding built environment is an appropriate setting for the proposed use. d. The Subject Property is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed, including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints: The Project is located within an existing commercial property along a commercial corridor with direct access from Diamond Bar Boulevard, one of the City's three major arterials, expressly designed for the automobile as the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX primary means of transportation. All utilities and infrastructure exist to serve the Project. Moreover, circulation will be improved by reconfiguration of the parking lot. A one-way travel lane is proposed instead of the existing two-way travel. The proposed travel pattern reduces the number of on-site vehicle conflicts by directing all traffic in the same direction. e. Granting the conditional use permit will'not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located: The Project consists of the reconstruction of an existing commercial building and renovation of parking lot improvements. The primary land use will continue to be a fast food restaurant. Rather than posing a detriment to the public health, safety or welfare, the Project will more likely enhance the community's visual character and economic viability. The updated fast food restaurant building with side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes is likely to draw more customer traffic into the immediate vicinity and benefit neighboring commercial uses. f. The Proposed Use has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service is a component of the overall Project, which is categorically exempt from CEQA as stated under Recital No. 4 of this Resolution. 3. Comprehensive Sign Program Findings (DBMC Section 22.36.060) a. The comprehensive sign program satisfies the purpose of this chapter and the intent of this section: The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose and intent of the Development Code by integrating the signage with the design of the building and having specific size, location, and design requirements for exterior on - premise signage. b. The signs enhance the overall development, are in harmony with, and are visually related to other signs included in the comprehensive sign program and to the structure and/or uses they identify, and to surrounding development: The proposed Comprehensive Sign Program enhances the overall Project site by providing size criteria for exterior wall signs that are appropriate to the scale and setbacks of the buildings, and are placed so that they respect and harmonize with the architectural elements onto which they will be mounted. All building -mounted signs will be consistent with the branding of McDonald's restaurants. Directional signs will help customers navigate the Project site for efficient circulation. 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX c. The comprehensive sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in uses or tenants: The Comprehensive Sign Program establishes uniform and unifying criteria to accommodate future tenant or branding changes, while maintaining the standards of design quality. d. The comprehensive sign program complies with the standards of this chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or height to the extent that the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of this chapter: The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of Development Code Chapter 22.36 and will enhance the overall Project site through consistency with the City's Design Guidelines for commercial signage, uniformity and easy identification of the signs, and neighborhood compatibility. D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall record, and provide the City with a conformed recorded copy of an amended reciprocal parking and access agreement with the adjacent property owners. 4. The protective railing proposed on top of the retaining wall along the north property line shall be of decorative design, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. 5. The design and color of the exterior parking lot light poles shall match the parking lot light poles at "Diamond Bar Ranch." 6. The monument sign proposed to be retained on site shall be refurbished to match the architecture of the building. 7. The north elevation shall be enhanced to add visual interest to the wall mass where glazing is not proposed. The revised north elevation shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX 8. A minimum 15 -gallon Chitalpa tree shall be planted in the planter adjacent to the ADA parking spaces. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Lorraine Fortelka, McDonald's Corporation, One McDonald's Plaza, Oak Brook, IL 60523, and applicant, Jessica Steiner, Bickel Group Architecture, 3600 Birch Street, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Z Raymond Wolfe, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: r_T411r*11 Greg Gubman, Secretary 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX l41rc 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review / Conditional Use Permit / Comprehensive Sian Proaram No. PL 2016-161 PROPERTY OWNER: Lorraine Fortelka McDonald's Corporation One McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60523 APPLICANT: Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Architecture 3600 Birch Street, Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 PROJECT LOCATION: 205 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765/ APN 8717-008-005 and 006 (Hereafter referred to as the "Subject Property") 1. Development Review: (a) Demolish the existing 2,489 square -foot McDonald's fast food restaurant building and reconstruct a new 3,746 square -foot fast food restaurant. (b) Renovation of the parking lot, including resurfacing and striping, new lighting, landscaping and accessibility upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 2. Conditional Use Permit to establish side-by-side (dual) drive-thru service lanes for the proposed fast food restaurant. 3. Comprehensive Sign Program to establish design criteria for all exterior on -premise signage. PL2016-161 Page 1 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. I. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of PL2016-161 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: a. Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. b. Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. The conditions contained herein shall run with the Subject Property and shall be binding upon all future owners, tenants, operators, or successors thereto. Non-compliance with any condition of approval shall constitute a violation of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code, and shall be subject to the penalties set forth therein. 3. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the Applicant has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Project, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. 4. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License as required by law; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 5. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017 -XX and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the construction plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. Each condition of approval shall be satisfied prior to the milestone set forth for that condition (e.g., building permit issuance, certificate of occupancy, etc.). If compelling circumstances warrant modification to the timing for satisfaction of a condition, the Applicant may request that the Community Development PL2016-161 Page 2 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 Director approve such a modification. The Community Development Director reserves the discretion to approve or deny the requested modification, and to require the posting of surety or other performance guarantee as a condition of approving such a modification. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days following this project's approval. 9. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department pertaining to construction activities, Project development and Project operations. 10.. To verify compliance with these conditions of approval, the applicant shall request and pass a final inspection performed by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. No certificate of occupancy shall be granted until all improvements required pursuant to the Project conditions of approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to plan check approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this Project approval request shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of the Project expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one- year time extension subject to DBMC Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1. Construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. Construction document PL2016-161 Page 3 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 requirements are detailed further under the Public Works/Engineering and Building and Safety subsections of these Conditions of Approval. 2. Prior to building issuance, a Certification of Design, together with landscape and irrigation plans prepafed by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect. Landscape construction documents shall be separately collated and submitted as a standalone construction document package. 3. Landscape and irrigation plans, and all supporting documentation, shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance in effect at the time of construction document submittal. E. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS The conditions set forth in this subsection shall be incorporated into the construction documents as applicable, and shall run with the land: 1. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances, . such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view, or adequately screened through the use of a combination of walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division, provided they maintain the required utility company clearances. The use of UV resistant wrap films on such appurtenances may also be utilized where appropriate and effective" for screening purposes, subject to prior review and approval of the Serving Utility Provider and Community Development Director. This condition is not applicable to utility appurtenances behind the existing Building which shall be considered out of public view. 2. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 3. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 4. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. F. CONSTRUCTION NOISE CONTROL 1. Construction shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays in accordance with the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Construction activity within fully enclosed buildings may occur provided PL2016-161 Page 4 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 that such activity is not audible at the Subject Property's parcel boundaries, subject to approval by the Community Development Director. 2. During all site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 3. The construction contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4. The construction contractors shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. G. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. II. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. PL2016-161 Page 5 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 2. The applicant shall comply with Low Impact Development (LID) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The LID Plan will be required to comply with the 2012 MS4 Permit. Plans shall conform to approved LID Plan. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. PL2016-161 Page 6 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10. A pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 11. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 12. Final grade certifications by project civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. D. OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. The portion of Gentle Springs Lane owned by the applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, be repaired in accordance with the recommendation of a Soils/Geotechnical Report prepared by Civil Engineer, licensed in the State of California. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any land use within the Subject Property, the Applicant shall either: PL2016-161 Page 7 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 a. Submit plans for review and approval, obtain permits and construct improvements along the Subject Property's Diamond Bar Boulevard parkway frontage in conformance with the Diamond Bar Citywide Streetscape Design Guidelines; or b. Submit a payment to the City of Diamond Bar in the amount of $120,498.24 to be applied toward future public streetscape improvements along Diamond bar Boulevard, between Golden Springs Drive and the SR60 on and off -ramps. 3. Acquire encroachment permit through the Public Works Department for any off-site work. E. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purpose shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan for dedication to the City or affected utility company. 2. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 3. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. F. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Division. Sewer plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Building and Safety Division. III. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Conditions: 1. At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. 2016 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. PL2016-161 Page 8 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 2. Provisions for CAL Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CAL Green Code. Plan Check — Items to be addressed prior to plan approval: 3. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 4. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 140.6 & 140.7. 5. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall(s) locations. These plans shall be consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building & Safety Division. 6. "Separate permit shall be required for all wall and monument signs" and shall be noted on plans. 7. An exit analysis shall be provided during plan check, showing occupant load for each space, exit width, exit signs, etc. 8. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CPC T-422.1. 9. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 10. All retaining walls shall be separately submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Works/Engineering Departments for review and approval. 11. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 12. Design for future electric vehicle charging and solar ready roof shall be provided. Permit — Items required prior to building permit issuance: 13. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. PL2016-161 Page 9 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 14. All food establishments shall obtain Los Angeles County health and environmental waste permits. 15. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 16. Submit grading plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 17. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 18. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 19. LA County Fire, Health, and .Industrial Waste approval is required prior to permit issuance. Construction — Conditions required during construction: 20. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 21. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred -eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 22. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 23. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 24. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. PL2016-161 Page 10 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 25. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey to be determined by the building inspection during foundation and/or frame inspection. 26. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 27. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 28. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 29. Drainage patterns shall match the approved grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as -built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as -built grading/drainage plan. 30. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. END PL2016-161 Page 11 of 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-161 Exhibit "A" Construction Estimate for Theme Streetscape at 205 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard R s �. _BASE BID ITEMS."'t�,.1r' _ ` _ �_;y..Q7Y ,'UNIT£ UNIT COST... SUB�OTA BAS _ COST _ EXTENSION•; QF BAS COST ' E TENSION TOTALS-'... Mobilization/Overhead & Profit 1 LS $7,200.00 7,200.00 Survey Staking 1 LS $7,200.00 7,200.00 ' Traffic Control 1 LS $3,600.00 3,600.00 Sub -Total $18,000.00 Demolition Concrete Sidewalk Removal 1,040 SF $3.00 3,120.00 Trees 1 EA $500.00 500.00 Sub -Total $3,620.00 Earthwork Grading/Compaction 90% 1,515 SF $0.50 757.50 Soil Removal for new Trees 2 cy per tree 2 CY $57.00 114.00 Sub -Total $871.50 Site Work Concrete Flat work 1,398 SF $8.00 11,184.00 - Architectural Paving Stone 117 SF $27.00 3,159.00 Desi n'A' — Precast Post and Wood Rail 1 EA $8,000.00 8,000.00 Design'B' — Precast Post and Wood Rail with decorative steel panels 1 EA $15,000.00 15,000.00 Iron Tree Grate 1 EA $2,500.00 2,500.00 Rams 1 EA $6,000.00 6,000.00 Driveways 564 SF $10.00 5,640.00 Sub -Total $51,483.00 IRRIGATION Irrigation Hunter Diip System 36 SF $2.50 90.00 Sub -Total $90.00 Landscape Tree, plants and mulch 1 LS 2,200.00 Sub -Total $2,200.00 Electrical Lighting Electrical Pedestial 1 EA $5,000.00 5,000.00 Design "A" Post and Rail in Parkway 1 EA $1,500.00 1,500.00 Iron Tree Grate 1 EA $1,500.00 1,500.00 Sub -Total $8,000.00 Sub Total 84,264.50 Project Design 15% of total) 1 LS $12,639.68 12,639.68 12,639.68 CM and Inspection 15% of total 1 LS $12,639.68 12,639.68 12,639.68 10% Contingency $10,954.39 Grand Total $120,498.24 PL2016-161 Page 1 of 1 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-1611 Exhibit UR BAN 260 E. Baker St. I Suite 200 1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1 (949) 660-1994 CROSSROADS July 5, 2017 Attachment 2 Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated 3600 Birch Street, Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 SUBJECT: , MCDONALWS (205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD.) DRIVE-THRu LANE EVALUATION UPDATE -Dear Ms. Jessica Steiner: We are pleased to submit the following drive-thru evaluation update for the proposed McDonald's (205 South Diamond Bar Blvd.) remodel (referred to as "Project"). This evaluation has been revised in response to the March 3, 2017 and May 29, 2107 Sasaki Transportation Services, Inc. comment letters included in Appendix A. The Project is located at 205 South Diamond Bar Boulevard in the City of Diamond Bar as shown on Exhibit A. This drive-thru lane evaluation is intended to determine if the proposed site plan provides adequate storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site drive-thru demands. In addition, this evaluation examines the Project site plan based on a review existing on-site circulation conditions. EXHIBITA: LOCATION MAP 10775-08 205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluotion.docr Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 3 of 13 As shown on Exhibit B, only a limited number of vehicles (30) currently access the site from the rear via Gentle Springs Lane. Based on a review of the 45 -minute video survey, most of the vehicles (122) access the site from South Diamond Bar Boulevard. The maximum observed drive-thru queue of 8 vehicles did not negatively impact on-site circulation, parking or driveway access from South Diamond Bar Boulevard. EXHIBIT B:. EXISTING SITE PLAN (45 -MINUTE AM DRIVEWAY COUNTS) LIM O 10.11411 JJe`�pp ('M'o'il onand) _ awminos title aNONtlld S l 6tPBORtlt6 �Ndtl HT1 S�JMtldS ONOWtlId 10775-08 205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluatlon.docx 1WURBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 5 of 13 Driveway Conflicts: The 41:57 mark of the video shows that there is adequate storage capacity on-site to accommodate vehicles entering the site without creating any backup on South Diamond Bar Boulevard. While no vehicles were observed blocking the public right of way, the existing 3.5 -foot wide bike lane and 13 -foot wide sidewalk provide additional buffer further reducing the likelihood of a backup on South Diamond Bar Boulevard. Driveway Conflicts: At the 25:56 mark of the video you can see that there is no conflict when a vehicle is entering and exiting at the same time at the primary driveway on South Diamond Bar Boulevard near Gentle Springs Lane. Far more vehicles (56) enter the site using this driveway with (10) few vehicles exiting the site at this driveway location. The Proposed remodel will eliminate the outbound movement at this driveway location. 10775-0820S South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluation.docx L� URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 7 of 13 TRUCK DELIVERIES Truck deliveries are expected to take place during off-peak hours adjacent to existing on-site parking stalls as shown on Exhibit C. As indicated on the site plan, three stalls will be reserved using cones during off-peak times to facilitate truck deliveries. It is expected that the truck deliveries will continue to take place during off-peak hours when staff is available to process and receive deliveries. To better utilize staff resources, McDonald's tries to coordinate deliveries during off-peak hours (12:00 AM -7:00 AM, 9:00 AM -11:00 AM, 1:00 PM- 5:00 PM, 7:00 PM -12:00 PM) when staff is available and parking is not impacted. EXHIBIT C: SITE PLAN 10775-0820S South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluation.dou Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 9 of 13 TABLE 1: EXISTING DRIVE-THRU QUEUEING DATA SUMMARY Survey data collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd. on Thursday, March 23, 2017. REFERENCE DRIVE-THRU LANE DATA COLLECTION To evaluate the proposed dual drive-thru order board configuration, Urban Crossroads, Inc. collected reference drive-thru queuing data at the McDonald's restaurant located at 5908 W. Manchester Avenue in the County of Los Angeles. This McDonald's restaurant consists of 3,814 square feet. The restaurant also provides side -by -site (dual order) board drive-thru lanes. To describe the drive-thru lane vehicle queues, breakfast, lunch and dinner vehicle counts were collected during typical weekday conditions on Tuesday, January 17, 2017. • Breakfast (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 7 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 12 vehicles. o A total of 168 drive-thru vehicles were served between the hours of 7:OOAM-9:OOAM • Lunch (11:00AM-1:00PM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 6 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 11 vehicles. o A total of 88 drive-thru vehicles were served between the hours of 11:00AM-1:00PM • Dinner (5:OOPM-7:OOPM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 7 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 11 vehicles. 10775-08 2055outh Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluation.dacx ��► URBAN cRossROADS Maximum Queue (Number of Vehicles) Order Board Cashier to Drive-Thru Time Period Vehicles Drive-Thru to to Pickup Maximum Served Order Board Observed Cashier Window Queue Breakfast (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) 6 3 2 10 106 Lunch (11:00AM-1:00PM) 3 3 2 8 79 Dinner (5:001310-7:00PM) 5 4 2 8 63 Peak Conditions 6 4 2 10 106 Survey data collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd. on Thursday, March 23, 2017. REFERENCE DRIVE-THRU LANE DATA COLLECTION To evaluate the proposed dual drive-thru order board configuration, Urban Crossroads, Inc. collected reference drive-thru queuing data at the McDonald's restaurant located at 5908 W. Manchester Avenue in the County of Los Angeles. This McDonald's restaurant consists of 3,814 square feet. The restaurant also provides side -by -site (dual order) board drive-thru lanes. To describe the drive-thru lane vehicle queues, breakfast, lunch and dinner vehicle counts were collected during typical weekday conditions on Tuesday, January 17, 2017. • Breakfast (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 7 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 12 vehicles. o A total of 168 drive-thru vehicles were served between the hours of 7:OOAM-9:OOAM • Lunch (11:00AM-1:00PM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 6 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 11 vehicles. o A total of 88 drive-thru vehicles were served between the hours of 11:00AM-1:00PM • Dinner (5:OOPM-7:OOPM) o Peak observed vehicle queue behind the order board of 7 vehicles. o Total drive-thru vehicle queue that includes vehicles at the pick-up window, cashier window and order board approached 11 vehicles. 10775-08 2055outh Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluation.dacx ��► URBAN cRossROADS Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 11 of 13 TABLE 3: REFERENCE DRIVE-THRU QUEUEING DATA McDonald's Location Maximum Queue Square Footage Seating Ratio (Queue Vehicles Per) Square S4 Seat Footage (Vehicles) Feet Capacity Feet 3,746 5908 W. Manchester Ave. 12 3,814 70 0.00315 0.17143 Table 4 presents a summary of the estimated parking demand using both the queue vehicles per square feet and per seat ratios. Applying the observed ratio to the square footage of the proposed project remodel of 3,612 square feet yields an estimated drive-thru queue of 12 vehicles (3,612 sf x 0.00315). On a per seat basis, the Project drive-thru queue is estimated at 6 vehicles (32 seats x 0.17143). Since the vehicle queue square footage ratios yields a higher peak drive-thru queue, an estimated peak drive- thru queue of 12 vehicles is used for this analysis. TABLE 4: PROJECT DRIVE-THRU QUEUING DATA McDonald's Location Building Square Seating Capacity Estimated Queue (Vehicles) Per Square Per Seat Footage Location Feet Capacity 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd. 3,746 32 12 6 As shown on Table 4, the Project site plan suggests that the drive-thru lanes will provide stacking (when measured from the order pickup window) for approximately 12 vehicles with additional on-site backup overflow capacity of approximately 3 vehicles. Therefore, if 12 vehicles were queued, the proposed drive-thru configuration would be able to accommodate the peak vehicle demands on-site within the planned drive-thru lane capacity. Our review suggests that there is sufficient storage to allow unimpeded traffic from South Diamond Bar Boulevard to enter the site. TABLE 5: PROJECT DRIVE-THRU VEHICLE QUEUE SUMMARY McDonald's Drive-Thru Lane Additional On -Site Estimated Queue Location Capacity Vehicle Storage 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd. 12 12 3 10775-08 205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluaticn. docx U! I URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Jessica Steiner Bickel Group Incorporated July 5, 2017 Page 13 of 13 1. Urban Land Institute. The Dimensions of Parking. Fifth, 2010. 2. City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Sec. 22.30.070 Development standards for off-street parking. 10775-08205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluation.dou U� URBAN CROSSROADS APPENDIX A: SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, INC. COMMENT LETTERS 10775-08205South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluation.docx LO� URBAN SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. MEMORANDUM DATE. May 29, 2017 TO. Fabian Aoun Fl? OM. Steve Sasaki SUBJECT., Comments on the "McDonald's (205 South Diamond Bar Blvd.) Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation" — Diamond Bar As requested, we have reviewed the "McDonald's (205 South Diamond Bar Blvd.) Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation Update" ("Update") for the proposed redevelopment of the restaurant site ("Project"). The Update prepared by Urban Crossroads is dated Match 30, 2017. The following are comments related to the current Update which in part, was prepared in response to our March 3, 2017 memorandum. Overall, the outstanding issues related to the potential drive-thru queues and proposed storage have been addressed, with only some clarifications and typographic ("typo") corrections that need to be provided. Comment 5 from the March 3, 2017 memorandum (for access and on-site circulation reviews/verifications), however, still must be addressed: COMMENTS: The following are some remaining typo corrections, needed clarifications, and a reprint of Comment 5 (3/3/17 memo): I. Page 2 & 3, 1' paragraph & Ia sentence, respectively: What is the building size and number of seats for the existing McDonald's restaurant at the Project site? 2. Page 2, last paragraph: There is a typo, "directly" should likely be "directing." The location of the truck deliveries shown on Exhibit B utilizes 3-4 parking spaces. How will it be assured those spaces are available during the deliveries? It is noted the deliveries will occur during "off-peak" hours. Whathours can be specified as "off-peak" if the city desires to make the delivery times a condition of approval? 3. Page 2,4t' sentence: Appears to have a typo. P.O. BOX 5159 LAGUNA BEACH,CA 92652 (949) 376-6613 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. MEMORANDUM DATE: March 3, 2017 TO. Fabian Aoun FROM. Steve Sasaki SUBJECT. Comments on the "McDonald's (205 South Diamond Bar Blvd.) Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation" — Diamond Bar As requested, we have reviewed the "McDonald's (205 South Diamond Bar Blvd.) Drive-Thru Lane Evaluation" ("Evaluation") for the proposed redevelopment of the restaurant site ("Project"). The Evaluation prepared by Urban Crossroads is dated February 1, 2017. The following are comments related to the current Evaluation, and a need for access and on-site circulation reviews/verifications: COMMENTS: I . Page 2: It is indicated the Project will increase the drive-thru storage capacity to "roughly 25 vehicles." On the site plan shown in Exhibit B, eight vehicles are shown in the drive- thru lane (the typical measure of storage capacity), with the potential for I or 2 added vehicles (or possibly a few more depending on the location of the pick-up window). The site plan and Evaluation need to detail the location of the 25 -vehicle drive-thru storage area, referenced and used in the analyses. 2. Pages 3-4: It is noted there are nearly twice the number of drive-thru vehicles for breakfast, when compared to lunch and dinner but the queues are nearly the same. Why does this occur? Also, note there is a typo for the dinner, time period (page 4). 3. Since the data and analyses reference the "Drive-Thru to Order Board;' Order Board to Cashier," and "Cashier to Pickup Window." these locations need to be clearly identified on Exhibit B and the Manchester Avenue McDonald's, so the analyses and findings can be verified. Y.O. 1301ti 5159 LAGUNA 13FACH,CA 92052 (949) 370-6(31:3 APPENDIX B: STUDY AREA PHOTOS 10775-08205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluation.docx 0 JN:10775 McDonald's 1 of 6 I� �k - -AN- c EO APPENDIX C: EXISTING DRIVE-THRU LANE VEHICLE COUNT WORKSHEETS 10775-08 205,South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluation.docx 0 AM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) LOCATION: 205 South Diamond Bar Boulevard CITY: Diamond Bar, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Board Cashier Window Pick-up Window Total 7:00 AM 1 0 1 2 7:01 AM 1 0 1 2 7:03 AM 1 0 1 2 7:03 AM 1 0 1 2 7:04 AM 3 0 1 4 7:04 AM 4 1 1 - 6 7:04 AM 4 2 1 7 7:05 AM 5 0 2 7 7:06 AM 4 2 1 7 7:09 AM 2 2 0 4 7:10 AM 2 3 0 5 7:11 AM 2 2 1 5 7:13 AM 1 0 1 2 7:14 AM 2 0 0 2 7:15 AM 1 1 1 3 7:16 AM 2 0 1 3 7:16 AM 3 0 1 .4 7:17 AM 2 2 0 4 7:17 AM 3 2 0 5 7:18 AM 4 2 0 6 7:18 AM 3 3 1 7 7:21 AM 1 2 1 4 7:23 AM 1 2 0 3 7:24 AM 2 2 0 4 7:24 AM 3 2 0 5 7:25 AM 1 2 0 3 7:26 AM 2 1 1 4 7:27 AM 1 2 0 3 7:29 AM 1 1 2 4 7:29 AM 2 1 2 5 7:29 AM 3 1 2 6 7:29 AM 5 1 2 8 7:34 AM 2 2 1 5 7:35 AM 2 3 0 5 7:35 AM 3 3 0 6 7:37 AM 3 3 1 7 7:38 AM 3 3 1 7 7:39 AM 3 3 1 7 7:39 AM 4 2 1 7 7:40 AM 4 1 1 6 7:43 AM 2 3 1 6 7:45 AM 1 1 2 4 7:46 AM 1 2 1 4 7:47 AM 1 1 1 3 7:47 AM 2 1 0 3 7:48 AM 1 2 1 4 7:49 AM 2 1 2 5 7:51 AM 1 2 1 4 7:52 AM 2 1 2 5 7:52 AM 2 2 1 5 7:53 AM 3 2 1 6 7:53 AM 4 1 2 7 DAY: Thursday DATE: 3/23/2017 U:)UclobsL10600-110001 107001110775lExce1120170323D!amondBarCount.xlsx O URBAN AM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) LOCATION: 205 South Diamond Bar Boulevard CITY: Diamond Bar, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Cashier Pick-up Total Board Window Window 8:57 AM 4 0 0 4 8:59 AM 5 0 0 5 Maximum 6 3 2 10 Tota Events 106 DAY: Thursday DATE: 3/23/2017 URBAN U: �UdohsL10600-11000L10700110775 �Exce) �2 01 70323DiamondBarCount.x1sx MD Drive-Thru Lane Counts (11:OOAM-1:OOPM) LOCATION: 205 South Diamond Bar Boulevard CITY: Diamond Bar, CA ARRIVAL TIME T Order Board Cashier Window Food Window Total 12:19 PM 4 1 2 7 12:20 PM 4 1 1 6 12:21 PM 3 2 1 6 12:22 PM 4 2 1 7 12:26 PM 1 2 1 4 12:29 PM 1 0 1 2 12:30 PM 3 0 1 4 12:32 PM 4 1 0 5 12:35 PM 2 1 1 4 12:37 PM 2 1 2 5 12:38 PM 1 3 1 5 12:40 PM 1 2 1 4 12:41 PM 1 1 1 3 12:41 PM 2 1 1 4 12:44 PM 1 0 0 1 12:44 PM 2 0 0 2 12:47 PM 1 0 1 2 12:49 PM 1 1 0 2 12:51 PM 1 0 1 2 12:52 PM 4 1 1 6 12:53 PM 4 1 0 5 12:54 PM 2 3 1 6 12:54 PM 3 3 1 7 12:56 PM 2 2 1 5 12:56 PM 2 3 1 6 12:57 PM 2 _ 3 1 6 12:58 PM 4 3 1 8 aximum 6 2 8 Tota vents 7 DAY: Thursday DATE: 3/23/2017 U: )UCJobsL10600-110001,10700)10775)Excel)20170323DiamondBarCount.xisx O URBAN PM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (5:OOPM-7:O0PM) LOCATION: 205 South Diamond Bar Boulevard CITY: Diamond Bar, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Board Cashier Window Pick-up Window Total 6:43 PM 3 2 1 6 6:44 PM 3 2 1 6 6:45 PM 3 3 1 7 6:45 PM 4 3 1 8 6:47 PM 3 2 1 6 6:49 PM 2 3 1 6 6:52 PM 1 2 1 4 6:55 PM 3 0 1 4 6:57 PM 2 2 1 5 6:59 PM 1 3 1 5 6:59 PM 2 3 1 6 Maximum 5 4 2 8 Tata Eventr DAY: Thursday DATE: 3/23/2017 U:IUdobsL10600-1100DL10700I10775IExce/I20170323DiomondBarCounfxlsx 0 URBAN APPENDIX D: 5908 W. MANCHESTER AVE. DRIVE-THRU LANE COUNT WORKSHEETS 10775-08205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evoluation.docx 0 AM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) LOCATION: 5908 W. Manchester Ave CITY: Los Angeles, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Board Cashier Window Pick-up Window Total 7:00 AM 2 2 1 5 7:O1AM 3 2 1 6 7:01 AM 4 2 2 8 7:01 AM 4 2 3 9 7:04 AM 3 1 3 7 7:04 AM 2 3 2 7 7:06 AM 1 3 2 6 7:07 AM 2 3 2 7 7:07 AM 2 4 2 8 7:09 AM 1 4 2 7 7:09 AM 2 3 2 7 7:10 AM 1 4 2 7 7:12 AM 1 1 2 4 7:13 AM 1 1 1 3 7:14 AM 2 1 1 4 7:14 AM 1 1 2 4 7:15 AM 2 0 2 4 7:15 AM 3 0 2 5 7:16 AM 1 1 2 4 7:17 AM 1 2 1 4 7:18 AM 1 2 1 4 7:18 AM 2 1 2 5 7:19 AM 2 1 2 5 7:19 AM 2 2 2 6 7:21 AM 1 1 2 4 7:22 AM 1 2 2 5 7:24 AM 1 1 2 4 7:24 AM 2 0 2 4 7:25 AM 3 0 2 5 7:26 AM 1 2 2 5 7:26 AM 1 3 2 6 7:27 AM 2 2 2 6 7:29 AM 1 2 2 5 7:29 AM 2 2 1 5 7:29 AM 1 3 2 6 7:30 AM 2 2 2 6 7:30 AM 3 2 2 7 7:30 AM 4 2 2 8 7:31 AM 3 3 2 8 7:31 AM 4 2 2 8 7:31 AM 4 3 2 9 7:32 AM 3 4 2 9 7:33 AM 4 3 2 9 7:33 AM 4 3 2 9 7:34 AM 4 2 2 8 7:34 AM 5 3 2 10 7:34 AM 6 2 2 10 7:37 AM 2 4 2 8 7:37 AM 2 5 2 9 7:38 AM 2 5 2 9 7:38 AM 3 5 2 10 7:38 AM 4 4 2 10 DAY: Tuesday DATE: 1/17/2017 U: �UclobsL10100-10500L10300�10388�excel �20170117MonchesterAve.Xlsm URBAN AM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (7:OOAM-9:OOAM) LOCATION: 5908 W. Manchester Ave CITY: Los Angeles, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Board Cashier Window Pick-up Window Total 8:12 AM 5 3 2 10 8:13 AM 5 4 2 11 8:13 AM 6 3 2 11 8:13 AM 5 5 2 12 8:14 AM 6 3 2 11 8:14 AM 7 3 2 12 8:15 AM 6 4 2 12 8:15 AM 7 3 2 12 8:17 AM 5 3 2 10 8:18 AM 4 4 2 10 8:18 AM 3 5 2 10 8:19 AM 3 5 2 10 8:19 AM 4 4 2 10 8:20 AM 4 4 2 10 8:20 AM 4 5 2 11 8:21 AM 5 4 2 11 8:21 AM 6 4 2 12 8:21 AM 5 5 2 12 8:22 AM 4 5 2 11 8:23 AM 5 5 2 12 8:24 AM 3 5 2 10 8:25 AM 3 5 2 10 8:26 AM 1 5 2 8 8:26 AM 2 4 2 8 8:27 AM 2 5 2 9 8:27 AM 1 6 2 9 8:29 AM 1 4 2 7 8:29 AM 2 3 2 7 8:29 AM 3 3 2 8 8:31 AM 1 3 2 6 8:31 AM 2 2 2 6 8:32 AM 1 2 2 5 8:33 AM 2 2 2 6 8:33 AM 1 2 2 5 8:34 AM 1 1 1 3 8:35 AM 2 0 2 4 8:36 AM 1 1 1 3 8:37 AM 1 1 1 3 8:38 AM 2 0 1 3 8:38 AM 2 1 1 4 8:38 AM 3 1 1 5 8:40 AM 1 1 2 4 8:42 AM 1 1 1 3 8:42 AM 2 1 0 3 8:43 AM 1 1 1 3 8:44 AM 2 0 11 3 8:44 AM 3 0 0 3 8:46 AM 2 1 1 4 8:47 AM 3 0 1 4 8:47 AM 3 1 1 5 8:48 AM 3 11 2 6 DAY: Tuesday DATE: 1/17/2017 URBAN U:(UcJobsL10100-10500L10300(10388)excel)20170117ManchesterAve.xlsm MD Drive-Thru Lane Counts (11:OOAM-1:00PM) LOCATION: 5908 W. Manchester Ave CITY: Los Angeles, CA ARRIVAL TIME T Order Board Cashier Window Food Window Total 11:00 AM 3 1 1 5 11:00 AM 4 1 1 6 11:00 AM 5 1 2 8 11:01 AM 5 1 2 8 11:02 AM 3 3 1 7 11:02 AM 4 3 2 9 11:07 AM 1 1 1 3 11:07 AM 2 1 1 4 11:07 AM 3 0 2 5 11:08 AM 3 1 1 5 11:08 AM 4 1 1 6 11:08 AM 5 1 1 7 11:11 AM 1 4 2 7 .11:11 AM 2 4 2 8 11:11 AM 3 3 2 8 11:11 AM 4 3 2 9 11:12 AM 4 4 2 10 11:13 AM 3 5 2 10 11:15 AM 2 5 2 9 11:16 AM 2 5 2 9 11:16 AM 3 5 2 10 11:18 AM 1 3 2 6 11:19 AM 2 2 2 6 11:19 AM 3 2 2 7 11:23 AM 1 0 1 2 11:23 AM 2 0 0 2 11:23 AM 3 0 0 3 11:26 AM 1 0 1 2 11:27 AM 1 1 1 3 11:27 AM 2 1 1 4 11:28 AM 2 2 0 4 11:29 AM 3 1 1 5 11:30 AM 1 3 2 6 11:30 AM- 2 2 2 6 11:32 AM 1 2 2 5 11:32 AM 2 1 2 5 11:32 AM 2 1 2 5 11:33 AM 3 1 1 5 11:34 AM 1 3 2 6 11:36 AM 1 3 2 6 11:36 AM 2 2 2 6 11:38 AM 1 0 1 2 11:38 AM 2 0 1 3 11:39 AM 3 0 0 3 11:39 AM 4 0 0 4 AM 4 1 0 5 11:41 AM 1 4 1 6 11:41 AM 2 4 1 7 111:40 11:42 AM 3 3 2 8 11:42 AM 4 3 2 9 11:42 AM 5 3 2 10 11:43 AM 4 4 2 10 DAY: Tuesday DATE: 1/17/2017 U: �UdobsL10100-10500L10300)10388)excel �20170117MonchesterAve.xlsm O URBAM MD Drive-Thru Lane Counts (11:OOAM-1:OO13M) LOCATION: 5908 W. Manchester Ave CITY: Los Angeles, CA ARRIVAL TIME T Order Board Cashier Window Food Window Total 12:38 PM 4 3 2 9 12:38 PM 5 3 2 10 12:40 PM 1 4 2 7 12:41 PM 2 2 2 6 12:41 PM 3 2 2 7 12:42 PM 2 3 2 7 12:42 PM 2 31 2 7 12:43 PM 2 3 2 7 12:43 PM 2 3 2 7 12:44 PM 2 3 2 7 12:45 PM 2 3 2 7 12:45 PM 3 3 2 8 12:46 PM 2 2 2 6 12:46 PM 2 2 2 6 12:48 PM 2 1 2 5 12:48 PM 1 2 2 5 12:49 PM 2 2 2 6 12:50 PM 2 2 2 6 12:51 PM 1 1 2 4 12:51 PM 2 0 2 4 12:52 PM 3 0 1 4 12:54 PM 1 1 2 4 12:54 PM 2 1 2 5 12:55 PM 31 0 2 5 12:58 PM 1 0 1 2 Maximum bi 5 11 I otal Events DAY: Tuesday DATE: 1/17/2017 U: � Udobs L 10100-10500L10300110388 �excei �201 7011 7Man ch esterA ve.x1sm o URBArm PM Drive-Thru Lane Counts (5:OOPM-7:OOPM) LOCATION: 5908 W. Manchester Ave CITY: Los Angeles, CA ARRIVAL TIME Order Board Cashier Window Pick-up Window Total 6:03 PM 2 1 2 5 6:05 PM 1 1 1 3 6:06 PM 2 1 1 4 6:06 PM 3 1 1 5 6:09 PM 1 2 1 4 6:09 PM 2 2 1 5 6:09 PM 3 2 0 5 6:10 PM 3 3 0 6 6:10 PM 4 3 0 7 6:12 PM 3 4 1 S 6:14 PM 3 4 2 9 6:14 PM 4 4 -2 10 6:16 PM 2 4 2 8 6:16 PM 3 4 2 9 6:18 PM 4 4 2 10 6:21 P M 5 4 2 11 6:23 PM 4 4 2 10 6:23 PM 5 4 2 11 6:25 PM 4 4 2 YO 6:28 PM 3 4 2 9 6:29 PM 2 5 2 9 6:30 PM 3 4 2 9 6:31 PM 2 5 2 9 6:32 PM 3 4 2 9 6:32 PM 4 4 2 10 6:32 PM 5 3 2 10 6:32 PM 5 3 2 10 6:33 PM 6 2 2 10 6:33 PM 7 2 2 11 6:42 PM 1 3 2 6 6:45 PM 1 0 2 3 6:45 PM 2 0 2 4 6:46 PM 1 2 1 4 6:46 PM 2 1 2 5 6:49 PM 1 0 2 3 6:50 PM 2 0 1 3 6:52 PM 1 0 1 2 6:55 PM 1 0 0 1 6:56 PM 2 01 01-2 6:56 PM 3 0 0 3 6:58 PM 1 3 0 4 Maximum 7 5 1 Tota vents DAY: Tuesday DATE: 1/17/2017 U:(UdobsL10100-10500L10300)10388)excel I20170117ManchesterAve.xlsm O URBAN APPENDIX E: 5908 W. MANCHESTER AVE. SITE PLAN 10775-08 205 South Diamond Bar Drive-Thru Evaluation. dncx ma § /Z\E§�\\./ <0H< 09- H: \0oo}(u!. ) ,E Cc O� '+ m�sg�i; NN I J m i i :Ee Jam.. intr i u_ ii co vi J 9 00 I Tr Q -i Q 0 ::) Z 0 m 0 Q J V_JmO Qza co J<O Qz QUO H� z00 m 00 0 N n U 5 R W oea[ ]Qi^e2oo �Uo �do wr �m yS�u Qno UQgnE mQm iia -t' f I C K E L R O U P A R C H I T E C T U R E MOSEL GROV P I NCORPORNTEa 3600 BIRCH STREEE T, SUITE 120 NEWPORT 411BEACH,7:9 CP 82860 P:. tv . 1.0011 I , r'. . I, . 11 w w.e,cxe,p rp.com Oe Alt tact FK.T rV{ ,L wI i,.., IN Its tl id 1. r� ,I. � r u SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (1201 .� 11 I \ I ` • n it McDONALD'S 004-0433 � ` (P) SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AUG O 1 2011' U JulyScal1° 017 July 31, 2017 DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA+}1�1Wa�I�aNdRefDlq�ndoFm,ry=Ian„,�®,- GYM cesla sae R n.ewa —— — — — — — -----�--- — — — —,_— a TREEET I I i°• e oeE RW .. -. gFN TP. _ 14 D�o odl _ PaWfW3 Lora geno� sDEro eE 0 I• 1. REDESIGNED I m :• I P a LC 4,1 „ I roeE REMOVFO •. ••. �_______� ;'•. '.. ' lbs - - - / �.. ..10m - I i�Q '� • I � I n o�, NNHHl I •1 P REMOYEO EE 101.•' ® 1 E 1_- 9 d ---- — — --L— - --- ---- �.a r--- • - ' - m S DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD NOPTM� (PUBLIC R.O.W.J BICKEL GROUP McDONALD'S 004-0433 (P) DEMOLITION PLAN \` ARCHITECTURE BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED TEO SCSI@: 1° = 1 O� \ o pEs767.STREET. a jos; 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD �\ w w. a SP•sio�c��m July 31, 2017 �R� ^�R DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA Hemi �. 3 I C K E L STREET, R O U P ARCHITECTURE BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED NEW ORT ACH.SUITE 120 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92060 949.]5].0611 F: 619.]0].001111 w w w.b/eke/O /P.com SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (120') 4 MCDONALUS 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SITE INFO ZONING: GROSS SITE AREA: NET SITE AREA: PRIVATE STREET EASEMENT: EXISTING BUILDING AREA: PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: F.A.R: LANDSCAPE AREA: HARDSCAPE AREA: PARKING INFO: TOTAL STALLS REWIRED TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED PARKING RATIO: C-3 APPROX. 30,060 SF APPROX. 28,310 SF APPROX. 1,750 SF APPROX. 2,489 SF APPROX. 3,746 SF 0.12 APPROX. 5,308 SF (18%) APPROX. 21,005 SF (70%) 13 19 6.3211,OOOOSF LEGEND: �.. �.. PROPERTY LINE BUILDING FOOTPRINT O LANDSCAPE i 35' VISIBILITY TRIANGLE G J o- LIGHT POLE TRANSFORMER (P) SITE PLAN Scale: 1" = 10' July 25, 2017 F{18,16230 -Mall M -m Bar, Dmm."d Bat BIwl,Des 1e116230- Oaal9„ sna wa.'.9 Te T£ a APFNOX I— — — — — I I J L 6 ASPHALT i.•�—� I (Q FCOTRiWF I I I McDONALD'S � APPROX. 3,746 SF I I LANE NE I I I I A/ t 1R'BIEII INIC(1N PAIMEO W/ f BICKEL OROU P ARCH ITE CTU RE P�\\ \� '4"' BICKEL GROUP IN--RPORATEC 9800 EIRCH STREET. SUITE 120 \��y� �P\�\ NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 P: 94R 767.0411 F: 949.767.0611 \`�\\ w w. 6l c e/O/P. P Pm Il'-ftl 91� SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (120') .o McDONALD'S 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA RETAINING WALL W/STONE VENEE CO SIFI STONE -SIOUX FALLS' W 3 U) O Z OC a J Z W 0 I HOPiX I (P) CIRCULATION PLAN Scale: 1" = 10' July 31, 2017 F;11 VUM30-A Ne WB DlwnmEEwBNSDasig,hSileU6R30- OealOn 811e PIan Exg HOPiX I (P) CIRCULATION PLAN Scale: 1" = 10' July 31, 2017 F;11 VUM30-A Ne WB DlwnmEEwBNSDasig,hSileU6R30- OealOn 811e PIan Exg B I CKEL GROUP A R C H I T E C T U R E BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92800 W: WOW.T50 /Ooke/949P5`om O 004-0433 MCDONALD'S 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" May 5, 2017 F:\10,16230- MCD DivnoM Bar, Dlemmd 13"M sIO mr BICKEL GROUP ARCHITECTURE BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 9600 BIRCH STREET. SUITE 120 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 P: 949.767.0411 F: 949.7670611 www.blckel9 �Pcom 004-0433 MCDONALD'S 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA O ROOF PLAN Scale: 1/411 = 1' 0' May 5, 2017 F:11M19220-MSA Dam dBar. Dia Bar BlrolOeai9M k1fY. f M' -P fIM, f 10'-I I' /1YINWW ELEV 4 B' -v 1/SILLf EIfV 3'-0� 5 Euv o' -o' I�3 ICKEI STREET, ROU P A R C H I T E C T U R E RICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3600 BIRCHEACH.SUITE 60 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 P: 90w.b 0911 F: 909.]5].0611 w w.blck elpip.com 1 N"S'MCPDC EIC, f 2Y -Y 1 XWW ELEV. f 9'-1 l pF,.i V9' McDONALD'S 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA NOTE` ALL RODFTOP MOUNTED EQUIP. TO BE SCREEN'➢ FROM VIEV (P) SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION Scale, 1/4 V-0' May 5, 2017 F:\1816230-MCODiam D,OIQ' ufdnos Bm BM\OBapn\FICOr Plan\16230- De519^ BUIItlIn93edlon.tivp wve.e r.+menmenvmn+uva..�.+mp HUIHILUN VINTAGE\ PL SH TA E -WOOD, BLACK EUROWEST —� METAL COPING � PLASTER SHERWIN WILLIAMS WHOLE WHEAT — "STRIP STONE'SIOUX FALLS HORIZONTAL NICHIHA . VINTAGEWOOD CEDAR moil WHITE CANOPY — BENJAMIN MOORE SNOW WHITE PLASTER SHERWIN WILUAMS TATAMI TAN 21'-e T.O. PARAPET Y 20'-0" 0'-0" T.OTO. P B.O. CANOPY WEST - FRONT ELEVATION BENJAMIN MOORE SNOW WHITE BICKEL GROUP ARCHITECTURE BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3500 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 NEWPORT SEAOH. OA 92880 P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511 www.Elcke/9ip.c.- "STRIP STONE" SIOUX FALLS McDONALD'S 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA SOUTH - NON D/1" ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Scale: 1/4° = 1'-0" April 24, 2017 F:\19,te2a0 - NkA OlemoM ear, OIOnKnO En, _ BNO'OC91801P0e61kM16230wCea9n EI9reti� .Ow9 n, nwn PLASTER METAL COPING E -WOOD, BLACK SHERWIN WILLIAMS EUROWEST WHO WHEAT 'STRIP STONE' SIOUX FALLS METAL FASCIA PLASTER SHERWIN WILLIAMS TATAMI TAN PLASTER METAL COPING SHERWIN WILLIAMS WHOLE WHEAT BICKEL GROUP ARCHITECTURE BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 8900 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92960 P:949.767.0411 F: 949.76].0611 www.D/cke/O FP -com CORONADO "STRIP STONE" SIOUX FALLS 21'-4" O,_ T.O. PARAPET Y 20'-0" 1 T.O. PARAPET 1 8.0. CANOPY 1 F=1 N HORIZONTAL � METAL FASCIA BAND NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD CEDAR McDONALD'S 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA EAST - REAR ELEVATION 21'-4" -' T.O..OMRAPUT 20'-0" MT.OT.O. P 10'-11'-11" — ' 8.0. CANOPY Y NORTH - D/T ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Scale: 1/4'= 11-0" April 24, 2017 F:\,giB290 - MCOOIemaM ger. ObmaM Ber BkNOKpMBe".Oo \,6230�OadYPF�tlo�m.Q.vO.nvm. 8 1 C K E L G R O UP \\ -.j ARCHIIE CTU R E \RICK EL GROUP IN CO RPORATEO DEC RIPCH STR EDT. SUITE 120 NEWPORT BEACH, CA ZERO \i✓\P:949.757.0011 F. 949.75TO.0051�\\�ww.elckeler PLAN RO'x15- GLUCAN BEAM -W WOW POST ON CMU WALL REFER TO STPUCT. IETAL FRAME ODOR :ORCRETE BLOCK WALL VTR PLASTER SHERWW VILLANS'WHOLE WHEAT- RIOR SURFACE TO BE MELTS A NON-ABSOPRENL STS FLA TER SHEPWW VILUAMS YMOLE WHEAL' '.TONE VENEC CED. i RIP STORE M'OUM FALLS - REAR ELEVATION 1A8 OR- OG. LAM DEAD xe AWG9OBPON ON MU ALL. REFER TO STRUC METAL FRAME DOABLE PS CONCRETE BLOCK WALL TOM PLASTER SISERWIN WITH..wr.11 MEAT' INTERIOR SURFACE TO OF SMOOTH A NOOTABSORBENT WITH PLASTER 9HEBWW WILLIAMS 'WHOLE WHEAT' CTONE YEM1EER COROHA. STRIP STONE 'SIOUX FALLS - FRONT ELEVATION �CC X16- GLULAM DEAD 8�8- WOOD MST ON CMU WWALIL. REFER TO STRUCT — CONCRtTC BLOCK WALL WILLIAMS 'MORE WHEAT' INTERIOR SURFACE TO OF SMOOTH 4r SCATABSOOD"CT WITH PLASTER SH. t�7:771/ OLUW.S 1..LF MEAT' STRIP STONE -VOWW FALLS' SIDE ELEVATION MCDONALUS 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS Scale 1/4 = V-0` April 21, 2017 F:T1 ENT ENT -MCO OlemMp Bar OIeTMa Ra, BIVNCesIMTAveL �yms�16P.R0yCDRI0n EIICYa*oPs.dv,, acNM r---- I RECYCLE I TRASH BIN CLEARLY TRASH BIN WOICATEO wA II PE SYMBOL Trv. FORMLL L____J PLAN RO'x15- GLUCAN BEAM -W WOW POST ON CMU WALL REFER TO STPUCT. IETAL FRAME ODOR :ORCRETE BLOCK WALL VTR PLASTER SHERWW VILLANS'WHOLE WHEAT- RIOR SURFACE TO BE MELTS A NON-ABSOPRENL STS FLA TER SHEPWW VILUAMS YMOLE WHEAL' '.TONE VENEC CED. i RIP STORE M'OUM FALLS - REAR ELEVATION 1A8 OR- OG. LAM DEAD xe AWG9OBPON ON MU ALL. REFER TO STRUC METAL FRAME DOABLE PS CONCRETE BLOCK WALL TOM PLASTER SISERWIN WITH..wr.11 MEAT' INTERIOR SURFACE TO OF SMOOTH A NOOTABSORBENT WITH PLASTER 9HEBWW WILLIAMS 'WHOLE WHEAT' CTONE YEM1EER COROHA. STRIP STONE 'SIOUX FALLS - FRONT ELEVATION �CC X16- GLULAM DEAD 8�8- WOOD MST ON CMU WWALIL. REFER TO STRUCT — CONCRtTC BLOCK WALL WILLIAMS 'MORE WHEAT' INTERIOR SURFACE TO OF SMOOTH 4r SCATABSOOD"CT WITH PLASTER SH. t�7:771/ OLUW.S 1..LF MEAT' STRIP STONE -VOWW FALLS' SIDE ELEVATION MCDONALUS 004-0433 205 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS Scale 1/4 = V-0` April 21, 2017 F:T1 ENT ENT -MCO OlemMp Bar OIeTMa Ra, BIVNCesIMTAveL �yms�16P.R0yCDRI0n EIICYa*oPs.dv,, acNM s CURVE DATA ® CONSTRUCTION NOTES: €R mf0RG0wss 1 BminW zuw9zrrure wWBANR1WwImIW. xettEu Dus Ren PPAvf REs NUMBERS DELTA WDNAS 14.0. iANf.FNi B ..$4 c Po R;,wi? 2�� =£ro$ 85w eAl'i o A.uo ilw' w I cr 66'z)nr' zaa' 4.w• zaT ) fwwu fwcvofMwPm uFxx Xwttwl vAAn Foy Fir 1 I a sen• 193' o J flmmW mww viwl Awpx snsEr wRroawx v9v9pp34a� I 1811 I 1 Na I CJ /35'09'00' J.lq' J.aT 114' 1 Im.m.m 1 ♦ d6RW SIRI AY.'NrtYw "'E� Bi I I 1 I _ .ua Cf 1as•ao'ao' I.M. Iw- 3.0• a oanc.wwl awtt'Ift 1/bww.roa8w e W.N. ESM' 19.4' 10 e b I[mvvuY wn vs h'%C awmtYwv[ rtw'1. c Mox�P41N Qla OS of 1 I m 1M'p]'M' fm20' 1.>]' 1 fdxNBF1 EPIIE .PXWNY ffF NM nMM9P pAY 10�6•/F MM1Gr I4GMMA rP ipXen eµumrppPaul vAii 9fl I I 1 I I _ Q 60 ISM' 6.66' F--- _ _ _ 'e —y° — +� � 1 I { I' M' CB AS'MYO' IB.M' /1.16' 6.41' N b mslw xvvgY cew wl nnc slxewe wx wli lewj. > e 0 WNW Im' am 241• f N.n'Imsf [a[wl[awbcunni (Im.W,IrvN)vw vnrc 5l uv lm -F. e I S'xl cM z4•zbk0• ZJ.M' lr.5z' 585' to MIffiMI LNd1.49.OWI IPIDMSIMGNO N/M rvd A.1 HI M•M•M• 20' 3.14-2.M• n w,mfar.•w aw cew lw svn'S'[♦w.®wx lw-z C12 m•sa19• 2M' 248' /.u• n tdsmJ♦'td'RI[IxV.eWry xrm WM'/m x5a r¢t r,•" I I Er C/JMYO 9.M' 41.4/' 11.18' n mmNn l'm[w¢avmw vumwv xml[M'/w vu rfw (SR.uMnvSM MlS mtflS9. Ct4 W'MY� zW' 171' J.M' efOPNn'lWazI`CYI C.1232' mm' 1221 1 DME1nMf SG¢0WaY[F IMmFanII bb''.AYYOr mfdmKMmIE[n[r.w%' IffMF 8L5w.rz' rzae• 016 i4 1♦5 ]I//nF¢k I- . � I I, r• '. I ISI � �R� •`I LI) 146'I34T' IJ81' 259' 551' le mwaa awwm ¢aW Pum iw lyt-[c I I. 3 • '. /O� 1 ' w A g� 41.41' It mn'11uf car awN,W mu (mOr. Aro o -m ren almri Z p J/J.6)' w- CI9 8I'zL55' aam- 4.m' m c26 9o'MW" BM• 12.57' eM• gg� m mwavNwmAamP l>Au'-k -I. I •+.vPrmiss yLL "999 1 m �$ � 6 � Li Q®< a, im-2)01 IN. 6 .99' 69] ear mwnr rom wG a¢a rya I { Irbl fF =YJIAl I f A. � I I RAD n as _ I I 1 I m� '• &sbTS N MM'MFJ N' OlM]HIE MWW AIPW XP 4aM sp P. fT{{ _� a 1 I I I � `I LEGEND w G.emv rn. mrala mxNfv v4 nix wa Nm wo¢ a w GrNlwa vx.•axfba mPNElr ceu WG aWWw.w ¢ax w-¢ ' �' ; C5 p 6 ', O xLw wroscvE Aa FA N IfgilMT IS]r1Y kiNmID. 6MR2 CVM 84 W. m IXIH 1R<c NSfY! NYM) ftW /MTd' Rf-1861 N.m. 815w IMIL9 N3N IW RPl y yC F r 11 '� y I ',5 Is i m' c •'. 411' BUCK CINMFE2 (�J R£$4R5 8 18- O.C.. BOM NMYS) f xGmuT Ibkro' ANPRn m'A1n[ w[x 8\M lu urz1 F -k ve'aLL Awro nw (WIl l4°-r6h WM &W ftrq o6Wl IR tF4Q L l" AMPHDVEV WFMFNiI -; N 1 G O.W' CUS$ #m 50 1.' C04P.ICIFD FlLL AWJ/OB B£LbMPACIEO SIIBCRMf PFB nXAt SOUS .VEPORr N o/t-¢ Nkrv' Xawp,Bxn [Caval[ urzw wav Iw mu R+� vmx5 nxtm ws (Wtttt lV-).a qrM eaax ttrA eSEPI M RNL k, e j f.F. vf131.11 L . I I .tL'WL' Pe 6 ✓` J €a i- I \ aariK I I O. z9' cP r CONLWf1£ (A[) orWWE Goss d a6 w mID RMq 8 M1aM6Ne¢m W ps. I 1.0- .W' COWACIEO flLL AYO/0.4 RfCOMPAC/N SUB4'INOF P£R fFW' L sW15 MPoBI 15 Nswt IeXxMT wwi.mm wleiwmv senor Iw.WItB an rcw NC-¢ I I —IW.a—vHlmm.' CavraNr nlmx nm L wvu lOkrm' I.wra-rc/m wev+Ml Sena vu mm.m aaa %[re 51 I II w—I� ED ng g vin'wrmv/ Rm or my uvr m wmu ♦ m leff M re fPwN='.raJ muo Nral we I I - I ; I / I i . }1111 .I xl 141 b � 912 3 _ __vswENr uNE n wla.•w wf Glw 6wn=xrlW vwruxlm oew we a, •'� Q 0' �• I e _ -__Mar MM Fz rovu .'a an Nta we I I" :� :.'p• I - 'R'` �£p —mom v Na.X w.,waW mra ru,,PN.W .a lx mfw rrre-« - - . ' oFBMWIWINO TOP 2 MW CF IXTINC AC PA"W ANO RfPAW MM NfW AG wsruS Yrs•xMf muvpMfa£ iMe ixE Nf nGwW ua'Iw MullpxRM u9 fMNGhw RUV) m. u NsmJ peuvrN' S Pa Aw ® - e OR 0 NfMOK VMW CDVWEIE CUPS d CUM ANO CgECR AV%W CU!!FR m 1PiG BwuvfeAaA lmAmmalGR xws 1a A Au ruw ws vNX wN era ®i o _ J famw mow BaSE.uart a -y. "" x •• PRO M PND REGMWACT WP 12'OF SUMFM£ m WOWID OFPM BELOWnMW n Gus wlpNnw (s¢ avSSM ruK ICn rtiusA o ` • _ >.of .a rwsawX F ottrxu uv me mus} ----- - PMaF JMIa - /1' ASP/Mli CIXICRf1E (AC) PANMG'1 fl/FR 6-AC4REGL2 845'E (ABf 1 ,4 S'A' f FJ m NdSH GLADE � � � / " Y:. W [M n aW 2unum uvav: (s¢.w Pum uo am xm¢ eu [-11 _. —__ g £ g 4 41 vsul xvuu grlwmw umsG c-ry € 0 3 A, rW rW u mwwroxmix Gxasvin r>s4 G5rAc aP ¢mP 14R-1. 0 4®®� _ y T➢E C. W.Ifi'. Y=bv�w 6 + 1' Y�ti� 1Jg,QPB @ NOTES „ W 1b DaWG'PIm911 r»wMIfSOm lR mft rSre-A 111[ g d $F xmvxc sia rvw ria F smnx sen rio-z xio G P)Po 9f MP rmKFl�'WwYEtWIM l9arW 0.4 EA 9: 9W! A" 6MRAro 1111¢ WINK M& � � y 6 -3I e*5go � I. SEE SHEET C -6b FOR SECTIONS A -A AND B -B. (w x1u uwJxrm mml rusftq. m eulrwr G ra swn w nneu wu x n umwlr a m'.wrc 11¢ awrozaw Fww surly g k � — N —�' s m 'aG'.a+.f -83v 2. SEE APPROVED SOIL REPORT FOR LIMIT OF REMOVAL & w1ww svml rc lm®mnr tsw .m Nwls �osx r.�u.-vaamvnwrv1: 11,i wnor'�'erlre' mr w"a1m1i v.0 �: w.iul mPDa Ar 1a mn wPww GWS x RECOMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. ns t155wrPmw]fv®I nea.� o .-�. « rmvraMVG� -r A50 A�u�mPSw T. w . n rox.BwrPG B:rmy NAS nre-l. PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK VOLUME ESTIMATE: w IrICLL HRCGWE IPbMWP5fiG16 mMY l!A Nf4 WC -I. DIFMOND BARBARB W ♦.wa �mw. P4 PwPw. H c N car WLUME. 30 CY m 4 Wena alvx Aw avow uPS Ar x'Wc uS x o R m5'L Wze ari FILL WLUME.'280 CY v wxlma (m AMM[ww w.xfMm+eA. p o01 IMPORT WLUME: 250 CY ss wr mM AfF AmN[Cmw mAss ren azag P EXPORT WLUME: 0 CY UM. Elim tl£aPNPTOX ¢ _ ;... toob "����,': �¢n x��•�. ♦ID INRIII WIPttLL NhxVE SIEK aVN � - aw5ma. G a t� i (018) 8xfw 11/�lfl $ p pw 05 IS I1 �)/ pFYtAU1°"\ nml®1 fE i F K � k Underground Service Alert "' s wAx scmE, As sx6xN � o B Call: TOLL FREE macr MDRESR srAJus GATE W 205 S. DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD PRELIMINARI' alr sSArz PWJ cBEcxEo 20' 0 20' 40'227-2600 DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA nW NORItrtiG DAYS AS -BUILT BE,IWE VW qG aw. LOS ANGELES GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN w-0ro04-0433 1"'N' C -6a e S AMONG BN! BLVD11.4' 14.0' 9.1' 84.5' 9.5 4.1' 17 5:4' DIAMOND SPRINGS LLC 1= ND 5CA' U -E AC PAVEMENT &DC WKWY PM SEO WILDING &OG WWW bW._"RUI PRNATE DRM (ALLEY) PROP LINE CONC CUR PROP LINE (E) FINISH SURFACE PROPOSED BUILDING SLA (E) RMSH SURFACE CONC LURE (E) CONC CURB NC CURB @ GURER o PROPOSED BUILDING SLAB of ": UNDSCAPF WIOSCAI (E) PUBLIC SIDEWPL(l CONC LURE o r CONC CURB -40' 11 _ SLOPE _ _ 'm m EXISTING BUILDING STAB ABOVE BASEMENT TO REMNN 6i; 2% f ytppf W Z ` y I 0.42' BLACK CONCRETE 0.19' ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC) (14 R S O IS" OC. BOTH WAYS) RFXIOVE/GRIND TOP P INCH Of E QAC 0.50' CUSS II AB 0.A' CLtiS II AB PAVEMENT AND REPAVE WRH N 1.0" COMPACTED FILL AND/OR RECOMPACTEO L0' "PACTD FILL ANO/OR RECOMPACTEO E ) KNISH SURFACE SUBGRAOE PER SODS REPORT SECTION A -A SOBGRADE PfR 6MAL SOILS REPORT SECTION - NOT TO SCALE ✓S PARCEL 1 EASEMENT 15.7' 82 1. ' IL0' 10.0' 435' 'i Z5" 16.0' J0.3' 0' 16.5 5.4' PRNATE DRNE AC PVMT AC PAVEMENT PCC PVMT PROPOSED WIOING WDC WLKWY LANDSCAPE AC PAWHEW AC PAKMENT GENTLE SPRINGS UNE (PRNATE ORM) PROP UNE (E) FINISH SURFACE E UNE �BLOC LINE FLOW O '/ LM'OSC4PE REMOVE/GRIND tt1P 2 INCH OF (f) AC -T NC CU,PB :,, w w E FAVISM SURFACE FLOWII LINE z PROPOSED BUILDING STAB ) PROiECTM RAIUNC (ON TOP OF WALL) INT -427 PAVEMENT ANO REPAVE WIN NEW ,W 1 SCAaF rR2WNGvrLEOI ONC LURE URI u z COW CURB PROPOSED BUDDMIG STAB COW MRWN GUTTER pROPERry/RRAINING WALL (SEE C -la h C-]6) SLOPE CONC CU 2% _ r m EXISTING SLOPE SLOPE JI WL_r MAX SLOPE SLOPE STAB AVE d45EMEW TO REM4N m m------- S J - -. - ..'.'. W=42'MA8 � 0.29' ASP T CONCRETE (AC) 0.50' LIASS D AB 0.42' BUCK CONCRETE i .. _.'.'.'. _ -� (14 REBARS O 18- OG WM WAYS) 019'ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC) I 0.33' CU55 11 AB 050' CL65 N AB 1.0' COMPACMD FILL ANO/OR RECOMPACTED 0.29' ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC) SUBGRAOE PER RW SOLS REPORT 0.50' CUSS n AB I.0' COMPACTED FILL AND/OR RECOMPACTED 1.0' COMPACTED ENL AND/OR RECOMPAGTEO Ef CURB h CURER 1.0' COMPACTED FILL ANO/OR RECOMPACTEO SUBGRADE PER RNSL SOLS REPORT SUBGRADE PER RN4L SOILS RIPORT E) UNDSCAPE SUBGRAOE PER FINAL SODS REPORT 0.29 ASPHNT CONCRETE (AC) GRAVEL-FlILED INFILTRATION TRENCH�050'•CUSS•It AB E) SCRFEN/R£TNNING WALL w PER OETNL 9/C -6c 1.0• COWACTED FILL ANO/OR RECOMPACTEO SECTION B -B S/BCRADf PER RML SODS REPORT NOT TO SCALE L� S g Ila p 1 r6' fi y ry xJi 0 r, l3 6 TC x 0-4 r NOE 1P IL. '�I I _ JS ]„A' I' r5 T1]J3IL SISDN x 19 M r1 ,. J 4 r.r r1 15 w 6 h I ax IT PROPOS® \ I.G BUODMG - rJ o S 14 \ DETAIL A / DETAIL B DETAIL C ""' �'" DETAIL D / N.T.S NLS \ N.T.A / \ N.T.S. \ \ o RA4.5" AC PVW MP BLDG WKWY 22.0' 6.0' CML W WWOLllL WITH WHEEt GLIDE (SEE NOTE ON C-2) RETAINING CURB SEE ROOM 13 ON C -fie BLDG WKWY RAMP UNDING IANDSCAPE to ,m nwm: woeeu avwe ra ' °° WI< SKYE dUH �jp < a - n '—I�� HANOtNL WITH WHEEL GUIDE NOTE ON C -l) OrN'"Y (SEE HN4DRAIL WITH WHEEL GUIDE (SEE NOTE ON C -J �esq sT5'PIHI ♦v W 1Y]VJd CONC B� 1% RETAINING CURB (SEE DETAIL 13 ON C - 5c) g SLOKII Underground Service Alert 2% MAX e3�MAY Call: TOLL FREE me, MORM StATuS �� .29' ASPHALT CONCRETE (M) 2%MAX 1-800 205 S. DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD PREDMINMLY 0.50"CLASS If AB -- 22%-26DD clrc slAm PVN cHEa¢D 1.0 COMPACTED RLL AND/OR RECOMPACTED DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA SUBGRIDE PER RNAL SOILS REPORT FM1£ NORM G DAYS SECTION D -D eProRE YOU Dlc C01P"`' M -BUILT N.T.& LOS ANGELES BED NION °� CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS 4004-0433 Po"`�'m ° C -6b NOTE PROMISE EXINGEIGN JORD XT 21Y� ON CENTER BVINUM E. FELT .. JOBS ROJER. NOTE. PROMISEE EURMOSION JDINT AT W� ON SUPER �KNN BF . FELT E. I.. N� PRGVDE �SIKN JUST AT 21F� OR CURVES MAGNUS YIGH IM' SATU�O FELT MUSSLEON JOSS Fia� NWR PROKIDE ENNONSION JOINT AT W� ON CENTER MXMNIM NKaE:FftGVRFE.I.1DNTAT.�OX..BMO.N1 �EYSNUR.RF la� (Ell �R a.'. �ADH OF VML VRFH IG- BMWED rM �NEION JOFF FILLER. 1N-p%)NK,ATcSCRGMRGPArROr� wW IN, mm. RELY ENBNNESN 1UNT H. UNEASE OBATIRLSON MENSUBMSONSMISS &WITIM, Off 1. 1. ESE S,cS I ROSZwk DIM FBI - 112 112 CORMIR !IW7110410 WAS AIDEBSOM EAGER 3.12 SANDAMBE CONSIGNEE, EM ENNI PRESENCE G Mj BUBB` RIMORM I ep 0 1) a .4 GGE COMININGOT 64NCH VAR CONIC CURB AT PLANTER EDGE 6 &VAR CONIC CURB ATWAUK EDGE 124KCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 24 -INCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER RITEI: �(i 24 -INCH CONCRETE RIBBON GUTTER PN"TSO KTS -INCH wLSM PFgmvNMG CENGRFN� SON, SUNMEN V12 BE.. 3, m I. BE. ALL I SPREAD z m1fPE".EM.P,.CNSG SM,S ULAS .� (Gf, LESS IS (DOOR saPi N 7E'/ INNINC Cer LEON MME. REST .,.pYE.0 ANDRES ENREV-� ...BBEI NEW RE 4 a -MN — — --- — ----- -- �\\NFSE SY, US. Po 7. W'DIM MIMIR PUND, --- -- ------ - SO, BER—A POID,�DW RESPIRE 0�, BEYLUEOF.WS.) \ZL IV, MS.", OKEEL INs) ISOCKS ITIC-1.3 SPEN, 'Sit 7". SM. 12� BUD EIREGARCER, C., GENUN SME PER, PUG, EOLKLLY SAVED W & RED, BORDEN (Dwammus) -=7= I BY ELIDE) !�7 IS. NEORRE FOR CATCH BASIN HEIGHT -H- REFER TO NORRE� GGAGjNGPL,NNP-TOPOFGRATBnG)&INRBftT WE CONTREACT.RSDUl FRONDE NO DUMPING SYMBOLS SHOWNABOW IN 2" OR N, 3, MR-. - - U., �.,. IN V (SPUR UO REINFORCED CONCRETE (R.C.) BOX REINFORCED CONCRETE CATCH WIN LnEv-, 'NO DUMPING"STENCIL I GRAVEL -FILL INFILTRATION SYSTEM TYPICAL DETAIL 0 k"IT11 KTS N.Ts urmt W/mnx BE YFWS�SAUU...FNI0NGG. HNN0,M Nor ES I CA 1� Y, 0. SUENE) BE OR NRPP BEEPERRED RPE ",F. WHIP 140 EFF, J2 JML Iffs 0 "a zls w .1. KNN PGU� PMNNCNKF N I. I I. MY) MEN U -�ATSISINCEDNES all. ME INFILTRATION SYS REM MONITORING WELL 36 -INCH CONCRETE RIBBON G�R RETAINING CURB (RW -1) 13 - ------- 71 CIAL G ri,cBROBONFUNPIRLDES .-ORES. Z too slaw* -PLUS jsftd*-Puus mialuKASter I interprim Ina .—INNNANI GRENNO'DRUDE. BM.NN. OF1.91-- Underground SerVice Alert Call: TOLL FREE FLOGARD PLUS CATCH BASIN FILTER INSERT —pNKTF:FS-1 � M`,N`RN 205 S. DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD 1-800 227-2600 ISETE FthN CHECKED OLANIGNID BAR CAUFORNIA ESE BOR NG DAYS SNUGLY LOS ANGELES AS -BUILT BETOREMYSU BIG GRADING SITE DETAILS C -6C "`0*04-0433]�--� SWO&CS (I mG HM#/) �.'H FCR 1 RqY 6v S6]RNeGS ALL S6V0&CS iP R4C MCN) J I6� NGH FON Y RGxS 6v 5640&CS 06'L1LPIpN O INSMIL S4N0&G5, 1-&C HNYI PER OEFALL A HEREON BO tlAIA(1 S.N0fl1G5. P-BiG MCN PFR OETNL 9 HEF£ON SWO&CS (I mG HM#/) �.'H FCR 1 RqY 6v S6]RNeGS ALL S6V0&CS iP R4C MCN) J I6� NGH FON Y RGxS 6v 5640&CS DETAIL A NTS DETAIL B RTS l�L CONTRACTOR CAN REPLACE THE GRAVEL SANDBAGS WITH FIBER ROLLS (STRAW SWADDLE) AS A ALTERNATE PERIMETER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) PER CALIFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY ASSOCIATION (GARDA) BMP FACT SHEET SE -5. Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit FG41 smmmrmtlnwnenmmwRm31 3 mwd.mprym , .��."• \a.YdiNk • ] a paeemarmm..myaTi o,narw.itr+wnnvwe �al mm.am r �ammwmmm.e.m.gmpwnw]»ewr ,r.n mm �m�mwx� wyO°ww�.d Amer'"`. rmrd� em.gaamw.m wPa. :mo.mwvnrmw.rn:e.,.mr>.ry w.....xm,m. wm s .rpmmrewm.mnp.pwxmew�m.. a.pmwmm.mnmr.ewe.wme . fw A�+rrmrewwawmn YrMemmm6mn �Mmww.su—w,Omm ei.]m a.eu.w.rerreampmu..m.xw..n]mmm]wb.uarrvbwp o ww..emmwap..a»ommarw,.em..m.mmwr.w..r..rwnm....Na.. n-mwwmn:�awe mm.®er.wmw.mprm,rmmn,,.Xn=..-.emmrx. ..nammrmm.m.•.rmarw.mmx..o«...'nr=e:. rvw. w ma erwe amm w..aq m...mm.pm w.m nmmarb�.mmtlu. WnwA mr..ea..�mnmmme,wmwwemw Im mm]m .m. ww ®N. w etyma mew..pwmne m wmurw'°na'tl'mmew..e'+.m. mrm mmm mawr,an gr.nmwvnw. �0 Mvwa,.mYrYewemmnW tlmeWmMwuNMmmnnYmu,NNm.m ..NnvrFnxw6� wm.wemmemie.ein aenw.aammm ov r4n n� nwi,mmnm�wX�mWmnpibm.ariiswnee.,�p, �,�'n�,v�mw.nxr ]r imunyrm. mgwmM� nx nm.wwr,mHmm� op@m,� u�w�r.usmr mxnw,m.amw ..�mww um�w v.�pm.rVn]m.vn�md wepWau.xwe�iem �b-mrryue v W4 aen NnRmmW InUwlylrwtlwtlu R.a nnrcm �. a�o rNgm.nit.m4..[m Nq.wNc.nma.meemwmm 3newwet� a Mhe wN dxW Mnwepm M,�rw4eH.m�m W mum°0mn� .. m�m.Jv. f.wrl.lmn�ewp,my w wew,.>.nem.erau,mmreeYrw]vm�.nvW]e-mmurymw bnwwe �equ'u ewmvm'wmwrv��ranmmemhnmmmewmNmhMnnrmHbm mw.,: s>i wd�' �°.:"wwxwumoan. e.m mm,. eow m.mX •�wm eamn.mw�wma w pnmmwY.e m w....m.wmw m]Xm.m. �w m'wmn.npramwreOMvrgmc rmeyum ee. mem rtum.M re p.,en avpn ].m Mb3IXwmm wo Ne W t u... manor amnmry mo X rvM w mmd,mH.�n my M X wAm dmm X mr m m., aX uy..,a]eauwarvxnmeyµ.mma w.r.wvr suwXum.rma Xru mrnrm�xnmay.mmm rm.mmms. .mw omrvm..mm.om..,mamm senor ro.mmmwm3,gaau.mml om � � b a CML FNGIHEEflING INfOxNAPON Z�9 to P7M�'AYI[ a U 0 \ems ra»S (ya) < 3m,1 I1 I6 Y k R tlT I tl R rm o 5 eFF OF LIU d k' Underground Service Aleft exL it Call: TOLL FREE wm N.w �Gx" l l iii s oras 1-800 205 S. DIAMOND 8Aft BOULEVARD STATUS GATE y_ 227-2605 mr FO PRELIMINARY FIVE ORE YOU GAvs DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA APIANS- cx[cl<cG SCALE: 1'=2G' BFFgiE YGU GIG mlxy q5 -GUILT ZD D w °° Los ANO EROSION CONTROL PLAN 04-0433 70mreax.]N Gw xo. C -6d REQUIRED MIX OF PLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED PERCENTAGE OF MIX REQUIRED PERCENTAGE OF MIX PROPOSED TREES SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (1207 24' BOX= Is 20% 83% 30BOX-3 0% 17% 15 GAL 80% 0% SHRUBS 5 GAL = 524 70% 75% I GAL= 177 30% 25% GROUNDCOVER 51ZE COVERAGE WITHIN 2 YEARS 100% 100% NOTE5 THE MINIMUM HEIGHT FOR UNE-OF-5IGHT CLEARANCE 15 5EVEN FEET. THE UNDMP ORY OF THE OTIATALPA TREE5 AT THE NORTHWEST AND 5OUTHEA5T CORNERS OF THE SITE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT A HEIGHT 7'-0' ABOVE GRADE PERTHE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR UNE-0FSIGHT CLEARANCE REGUIREmE . 5TRUCTURE5 OR IAND5CAPING OVER WIN HEIGHT 511ALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN A TRAFFIC 5AFE11' 51TE AREA FORMED BY THE INTERSECTION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, DRIVEWAYS OR ALLEYS (DBMC SECTION 22.30.050 (7)7 SCALE: 1 16" = V-0" 0 16 32 48 eR _ gg 3 mQ nP 4324 uz yy i •a F ai: J gee'S�E� a � g4pe�3ega fr a0�4' eT` is as a3�xg 'C 8 iEC C Ef giF -W day gnp y�iE:ee{{FF� Eef-c5 i5 p6p g Nw E 00 RR�� &2F��k 'LP -1 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (1207 PLANT PALETTE 5YM. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE 5YM. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE QNTY. E5 5HPUB5 ANIGOMWHO5'PINK JOEY' KANGAROO PAW IGAL CHITALPA TA511UN EN515'PINK DAWN' CHITALFA 24' 6 3G' BOX 5MDRD 4 t 3 c FE5TUCA MAIM AT FESCUE 5 GAL ORHAPHIOIEP151NDICA'JAC EVANS` INDIA HAWTHORN 5 GAL LAWANA MONT.'IEMON 5WIRL' YELLOW IANTANA 5GA- RHOSLANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24'80% STNDRD II F A NU5 PUNGENS SILVERBERRY 5 GAL GPOUNDCOVEP DIETES BICOLOR FORMIGHT ULY 5 GAL �IIIU WONKffrLY OW GAJ11APATOMENDOD GAIUARDIA GRAND.'OAZZIER' BLANKET FLOWER MIX5� 50% MIX 50%/50% CAWSIEMON 7JFNE JOHN' DWARF BOITLEBRIJSH SGAL SHREDDED BARK MULLFI TOP DRESSING 3"THIGC LAYER VINE vow4(�/n ..w�mvvvw� HARDENBERGIA'HAPPY WANDERER' PURPLE ULAC VINE 5 GAL A , A SCALE: 1 16" = V-0" 0 16 32 48 eR _ gg 3 mQ nP 4324 uz yy i •a F ai: J gee'S�E� a � g4pe�3ega fr a0�4' eT` is as a3�xg 'C 8 iEC C Ef giF -W day gnp y�iE:ee{{FF� Eef-c5 i5 p6p g Nw E 00 RR�� &2F��k 'LP -1 NOTES. L THE FWTCANBLE LEVELS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. MY SUBSTITUTIONS IN SPECIFIED FIXTURES OR "AGES TO LAYWT VILL AFFECT LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN AND WILL IIII BE THE RESPUNSIBILITY W SECURITY LIGHTING. F. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE SOFFIT / BUILDING LIGHTING IS NUT REFLECTED ON THE DRAWING UNLESS SOFFIT / BUILDING LIGHTING IS SPECIFIED IN THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE BELOW. I DISTANCE BETWEEN READINGS 10, 4. FINAL ADJUSTMENTS TO AIMING ANGLE/DIRECTION OF FIXTURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ELABORATE LIGHT TRESPASS OR GLARE ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTIES Be ROADWAYS. 0.0 03 1.5 Ib 12 LI DJ 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.2 0.5 0.0 ,_. .. CC�y. 1111 3 4.84.8 6�T fiI 5.3 4J... 3. r. .�: }: IA 6. X 3.9 AT ' .] 56 6.0 3.9 L9 5.9 01 POLE TYPE. WAMI vR ALLOWED • PROJECT MIND LOAD CRITERIA BASED ON ASCE )-ID MIND SPEEDS (3 -SEC PEAK GUST MPH) 7 -40 -1 -GL -TA -PS (e) 6 90mpN)2 50 YEAR MEAN RECURRENCE INTERVAL PAVED SURFACE READINGS Average 3.9 M..IP. 9.1 MIH — LI PVD -Min 3.51 K Mh B2) PROPERTY LINE READINGS Aver..0 0.5 M.XInun 3.5 MlMnun 0.0 AVDMin N/A M6% -Min N/A POINT -BY< INT FWTCHNDLE PLDT FOR M.DRMLD•S 205 S DIAMOND BAR BLVD 1PCP35311A E 1 VICINITY MAP Scale: N.T.S. i e p." 09 yie0 Flo _ 9 i - 7 u,rli " t_ 9 r�VW Y ra r c „�nd,e O {s 3055 Dlemend Be, Blvd, + ' Diamond Be,. CA 91755 k k Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08.2305-08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: R1 01/11/17 LR New site plana elev. (2.75) R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan 3 elev (275) R3 217/17 MH change to stralacache Rd 2/10/17 MH cell outs site plan (.25) Re 3/21/17 MH change site plan (5) Re 626/17 LR Change X to J (.75) R7 07/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) Re 07/10/17 LR New elevations, slim. mceway, sign G to 6'-0", show sign D on site plan (2.75) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 01 Of: 09 Note: The Colors depicted here are a graphis representatim. Actual mlms any vary. See calor spe.111C..n.. SITE PLAN SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (120) TO REMAIN V Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: SIGN SCHEDULE - McDONALD'S SIGNAGE L. Ramirez NO. DESCRIPTION ILLUM. AREA QUANT.1 TOTAL A CHANNEL LETTERS Y 32.8 1 32.8 B CHANNELARCH Y 14.0 4 56.0 C D "WELCOME" LETTERS N 3.0 1 — N WINDOW BANNER N •• 1 — F WINDOW BANNER N 2 — O STRATACACHE MENUBOARD Y 29.5 2 — H SPRINGBOARD CANOPY SIGN Y — 2 •• I STRATACACHE PRESELL Y 8.8 2 - J GATEWAY CLEARANCE SIGN N •' 2 •• K L z TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE = 88.8 SITE PLAN SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD (120) TO REMAIN V Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08.2305.08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: R1 01/11/17 LR New site plans elev. (2.75) R202/01117 LR New site plan & elev (2.75) R3 217/17 MH change to shalacache R42110117 MH call cuts site plan (.25) R5 3121/17 MH change site plan (.5) R6 6116/17 LR Change X to J (.75) R7 07/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) RB 07/10/17 LR New elevations, arm. raceway, sign G to 6'-01, show sign D on Star plan (2.75) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct, Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct, Mgr. Page: 02 Of: 09 This Is an original unpubllshad drawing created by submitted furryour approval. his t be to anyone outside approval. k ni not to fie shown to anyone outside copied Or nor is it to hi n. Th changing ging o or colors, size In any fashion. The chaethod does not alter ]he design. 0als illumination method does not by Supe design. Ownershipdvertthis design Is Authoritarian by Superior Elethis design nInanyfas,Inc. ustbeobtanto use .Hung from Superior El.con muel be obtained in wdtlngfram 3upetlsr Eledticel Advertising,Inc. © SEA 2016 Note: The Colors depicted here are a graphic representation. Actual colors may vary. See color specifications. 441-0e± E -WOOD. LACK EURDWE B1 HORIZONTAL NICHIHA METAL COPING A VINTAGEWOOD CEDAR PLASTER SHERWIN WILLIAM$a WHOLE WHEAT 88--6 WHITECANOPY — CORONADO— BENJAMIN MOORE °STRIP STONE` SIOUX FALLS SNOW WHITE 1 FRONT ELEVATION - WEST Scale: 3/32" = 1.41 EAP PLASTER SHERWIN WILLIAMS TATAMITAN Xd" _ I.U. f 21'- 51 0 211'-0 T.O. P 14 f, 110. 44'-0e± PLASTER - METALCORNG E -WOO BZ I SHERWIN WILLIAMS; 1 EUROW WHOLE WHEAT 4r -On ,1 _ T.0 PARAPET 30 31-6- 1.0 PARAPET 6,0LANOI'f / \ T.O. DOOR l' `STRIP STONE` SIOUX FALLS METAL FASCIA BAND ,L REAR ELEVATION -EAST Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08-231 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: R1 01/11/17 LR New site plan & elev. (2.75) R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan & elev (2.75) R3 2/7/17 MH change to stratacache R4 2/10/17 MH call outs site plan (.25) R5 3/11/17 MH change site plan (.5) R6626117 LR Change X to J (.75) R707/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) R8 07/10/17 LR New eleva0ons, elim. raceway, sign G to e''-0', show sign D on site plan (2.75) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 03 Of: 09 NO.; The Colors d.nded here are a graphic Ssecoler,pw.Actualcalorsmayvary. See color apeclficeliona. Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" HORIZONTAL NIGHIHA - VINTAGEWOOD CEDAR PLASTER SHERWIN WILLIAMS TATAMITAN — B3 E -WOOD,_ 4-_Dn. BLACK EUROWEST 1 WHITE CANOPY BENJAMIN MOORE SNOW WHITE 89'-6"+ CORONADO 'STRIP STONESIOUX FALLS METAL COPING PLASTER SHERWIN WHOLE III 21' A" 1.0 PARAna --19 I.O. PARAPLT 9,-4-4 B.O. CANOPY 4� METAL FASCIA BANG J SOUTH - NON D/r ELEVATION -A DRIVE THRU ELEVATION - SOUTH UScale: 3/32" = 1'-0" 21'-4" .i. 10. PARAPLT Y 20'-0" 16 PARAPLI in ' -W 8.0.. � �1NnPY 1� LEVATION Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08-2305.08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: RI 01/11/17 LR New site plan & elev. (2.75) R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan & elev (2.75) R3 2!7/17 MH change to stratacache R4 2/10/17 MH call outs site plan (.25) RS 3/21/17 MH change she plan (5) R6 6/26/17 LR Change X to J (.75) R7 07/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) R8 07/10/17 LR New elevations, slim. raceway, sign G to 641% show sign 0 on s0e plan (2.75) FON JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FON CONSTRUCTION DATE Aat. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 04 Of: 09 Nota: The Colors dgldtldl here areagraphic representation. Actval colors may vary. See color speclheallons. 161-5'1 d(:o 1/0 21-011 Quantity: One (1) Required SPECIFICATIONS: LETTERS: RETURNS: ILLUMINATION: CHANNEL SUPPORT: POWER REQ: NOTE: Note to All INJECTION MOLDED WHITE POLYCARBONITE OPAQUE SILVER WHITE LED'S 4" x 8" ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION PAINTED SILVER 1.6 AMPS 120 Sign Voltage This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. All wall penetrations to be sealed with UL Listed silicone sealant. 32.8 Sq. Ft. i = 1' -nn PAN LOW VOLTAGE WIRING FROM LEO TO 20A 120-27NAC DISCONNECT RUBBER BUSHING LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LEDs) #10x3'/'DRIVE SCREWS AS REQUIRED PER FIELD CONDITIONS BRAKE FORM ALUMINUM WEEP HOLE COVER ATTACHED TO INTERIOR OF LETTER ONE (1) %' WEEP HOLE BEHIND LETTER LOCATED AT ALL AREAS THAT MAY COLLECT WATER SIDE VIEW for Wood/Wood Construction n.t.s 0 Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Page: 05 Of: 09 This Is an original unpublished drawing created by Superior ElectdcalAdvertising,Inc. His eubmieed toy your approval.It is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organization, nor is it to be mproduced, copied or exhibited In any fashion. The changing of colon, sizes, materials or Illumination method does not alter the design. Qwnarshlp of this design Is held by Superior Electrical Adwithing, Inc. Authode tlon to use this design in any fashion must be obtained in wdeng from Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc. © SEA 2016 Note: The Calors depicted here are a graphic representation. Actual colors mail vary. See color specl&aRons. Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design 1 16.08-2305-08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: Rt 01/11/17 LR New site plan a elev. CLASS 2 LOW VOLTAGE (2.75) WIRING (NO CONDUIT R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan a shear REQUIRED) (2.75) POWER R3 2(7/17 MH change to statacache SUPPLY BO% R42/10/17 MH call outs site plan (.25) RS 3/21/17 MH change site plan (.5) POWER R6 6/26/17 LR Change X to J (.75) SUPPLY R707/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) RS 07/10/17 LR New elevations, slim. J-BO%WITH raceway, sign G to 6'-O", show sign D 120-D20 on site plan (2.75) DISCONNECT sverex FLE%(FLEMBLE FOR JOB CHECK DATE CONDOM uouionGHT Acct Mgr. CONNECTORS FORCONSTRUCTION DATE PaIMAar POWER Acct. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 05 Of: 09 This Is an original unpublished drawing created by Superior ElectdcalAdvertising,Inc. His eubmieed toy your approval.It is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organization, nor is it to be mproduced, copied or exhibited In any fashion. The changing of colon, sizes, materials or Illumination method does not alter the design. Qwnarshlp of this design Is held by Superior Electrical Adwithing, Inc. Authode tlon to use this design in any fashion must be obtained in wdeng from Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc. © SEA 2016 Note: The Calors depicted here are a graphic representation. Actual colors mail vary. See color specl&aRons. 3--6- (y) SPECIFICATIONS: LOGO: INJECTION MOLDED YELLOW POLYCARBONITE RETURNS: OPAQUE POLYCARBONITE PAINTED SILVER ILLUMINATION: WHITE LED'S POWER REQ: 1.3 AMPS NOTE: Note to All Contractors F1201 Sign Voltage This siggn is intended to be installed in accordance with the to of ArtlGe 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign, All wall penetrations to be sealed with UL Listed silicone sealant. 4" RETURNS PAINTED SILVER INJECTION MOLDED POLYCARBONITE LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LEDs) LOW VOLTAGE WIRING FROM LED TO LED .063 ALUMINUM C -CHANNEL BACK PRIMARY POWER SELFCONTAINED POWER SUPPLY 20A 120-277VAC DISCONNECT SWITCH I11.1:W:111417PI Ia9ll111111011111911 1 If #10 x 31h" DRIVE SCREWS MINIMUM THREE (3) PER LOGO OR AS REQUIRED PER FIELD CONDITIONS PAN HEAD SCREW ONE (1)1/4" WEEP HOLE LOCATED AT ALL AREAS THAT MAY COLLECT WATER TYPICAL SECTION DETAIL - SELF-CONTAINE Scale: n1s Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design Ni 16-08-2305.08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. Ni Revisions: R7 01/11/17 LR New site plan & elev. (2.75) R2 02101/17 LR New site plan & elev (2.75) R3 20117 MH change to stratace the R4 2/10/17 MH call outs site plan (.25) R5 321117 MH change site plan (.5) R6 6126/17 LR Change X to J (.75) R7 07/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) Re 07/10/17 LR New elevations, slim. raceway, sign G to 6'V. show sign D on site plan (2.75) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 06 Of: 09 This Is an original unpublished drawing created by SeperiaT Electrical Advertising, Inc. It Is submitted for your approval. it is not to be shown to anyone aublde of your area header, nor is It to be reproduced, copied ar exhibited In any fashion. The changing of colors, sizes, mate dab or Illumination method doe. not elter the design. Ownership of this design Is held by superior Electrical Advedieing, Inc. AufhorWtlon to use this design In any fashion must be obtained in writing ham superior Electrical Advertising, Inc, © SEA 2016 Note: The Colors depicted here area graphic representation. Armed colors may vary. see color speciacatlans. -6�� �l �,4a" n 8 1/ \' I R� � MA(0),l e D NON -ILLUMINATED FREESTANDING FLAT CUT OUT LETTERS 3.0 Sq. Ft. Quantity: One (1) Required Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" SPECIFICATIONS: • LETTERS: • RAIL: 1" x 1" Steel Angl with Ya" Plat FLAT CUT OUT ALUMINUM PAINTED BLACK WITH GRAY VINYL INSET ON FACE ALUMINUM PAINTED BLACK MOUNTED TO AWNING SUPPORT WITH 1/4 -20 SELF DRILLING SCREWS FOUR (4) PLACES 2'-10" o I � • PIGMENTED ABS TO MATCH PMS #425C WITH SCREENED COPY • TWO (2) STAINLESS STEEL S -HOOKS AT TOP SO TO CONNECT TO EYEBOLTS ABOVE • PANEL: GRAY • COPY: WHITE • MOUNTING BRACKET: 1" X 1" STEEL ANGLE AND PLATE PAINTED BLACK 1" x 1" Steel Angle with Y4" Plate 1" x 1" Steel Angle with Y4" Plate 2'-10" Pick Up 0 1011 3'-W 2'-10" 2'-%6' can10„ 2.49 Sq. Ft. F1 F2 SINGLE FACE NON -ILLUMINATED WINDOW POSITION PANEL W/MOUNTING BRACKET 2.49 Sq. Ft. :1" = 1'-0" Quantity: One each /Two (2) Total Required Scale: l" = 1'-0" SPECIFICATIONS: • PIGMENTED ABS TO MATCH PMS #425C WITH SCREENED COPY • TWO (2) STAINLESS STEEL S -HOOKS AT TOP SO TO CONNECT TO EYEBOLTS ABOVE • PANEL: GRAY • COPY: WHITE • MOUNTING BRACKET: 1"X 1" STEEL ANGLE AND PLATE PAINTED BLACK Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08.2305-08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: R1 01/11/17 LR New site plan E same. (2.75) R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan A elev (2.75) R3 217117 MH change to stratacache R4 2/10/17 MH call outs site plan (.25) R5 3/21/17 MH change site plan (5) R6 6/26/17 LR Change X to J (.75) R7 07/5/17 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (75) RB 07/10/17 LR New elevations, slim. raceway, sign G to 6'-0", show sign D on site plan (2]5) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 07 Of: 09 This less edginal unpublished drawing created by Superior Meant Advatials ,Inc. 1115 submitted for your approval. It is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organisation, nor Is It to be reproduced, copled or exhibited In any fashion. The changing of colors, sizes, materials or illumination method does not alter the design. Ownership of this design Is held by Superior Electrleel Advertlsingdnc. Aulhoricallontouse this design in any fashion must be obtained in wtlting hem Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc, © SEA 2016 Note: The Were depicted here are a graphic representatlon, Actual colors may vary. Sae color spaca cations. ** ALL FOOTINGS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ** (for signs on this page) H1 I H2 I G1 I G2 Brake formed ACM abandon canopy adverse to steel sub lame, NG Chamoal Brake lormetl ACM datlding atlacM1edtoshel sub Irma. Polntetl Yetlnw amenligid Order Here and underscore ap pamm to be wbas aAeclive vinyl Bods aimed space di pole saver adari to sted sub tram¢. NG Charcoal Seam It,, preset panels Four (4)1° remain, x 46° loop gaNamed anchor bolts 1 R' a P-6' a 5-4.11,11 Isar platy 11 1 12 STRATACACHE PRESELL 8.8 Sq. F6 Two (2) Gone Required Scale: 1/4" =1'A•• ayji p.$__ Seam line between panels J1 10'-10" Coslem behind 1/0° Nick charcoal Closed panels ash back side to be removable (me). I/6' daemon speaker. 2 on Coder Hera) black vinyl Custom clusated.063' Nick aluminum punting plate cover& bottom wird backside to be removable, mired black 1.49 iD��M�����M on Clearance 9 Feet STRATACACHE MENUBOARO 29.5 Sq. Ft. Twp (2) Units Required Scale: l/4"=1'-0" 1 g, f AluGoband painted charcoal 9-0 To Pavement Metal Base Enclosure black 1—FU611 Tall Curb -7" _U GATEWAY CLEARANCE SIGN One (1) Unit Required Scale: N.T.S. J2 Be 8'•BYz" B° ���M�To i Clearance 9 Fel To P GATEWAY CLEARANCE SIGN One (1) Unit Required Scale: N.T.S. Project: McDonald's Address: 205 South Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Account Manager: S.Janocha Designer: L. Ramirez 3.50 Scale: AS NOTED Design No.: 16-08.2305.08 Date: 08.31.16 Reg. No.: Revisions: Rt 01/11/17 LR New site plan a elev. (2.75) R2 02/01/17 LR New site plan 8 ales (2]5) R3 2O/17 MH change to slralacache R4 2110117 MH call outs site plan (.25) R5 3121117 MH change site plan (.5) R6 6126117 LR Change X to J (75) R7 0715117 LR Add sign I, change H to spring board (.75) R8 07/10/17 LR New elevations, elict receway, sign G to 6'-0", show sign D on site plan (2.75) FOR JOB CHECK DATE Acct. Mgr. FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE Acct. Mgr. Design Production FOR INSTALL ONLY DATE Acct. Mgr. Page: 08 of. 09 This Is an original unpublished dmwing created by Superior Electrical Adeasusing, Inc. Ills submitted for your approval.lt is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organization, nor is It to be reproduced, copied or exhibited In any fashion. The changing of colon, sizes, materials or illumination method does not alter the design. ownership of this design Is held by Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc. Authorization to use this design in any fashion must be obtained in writing ham Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc. © SEA 2016 Note: The colors depicted here are a graphic representation. Aetna l colors may, vary. Sae color specifications. \ ;\ >G z; �$ ze z ym ::t :5` az » ` y% >/ )}! . m Eu !: !$ ;m a/ _ }\% (\ } z ( / }/ 0/ co .. \§ »0 »- m= q 2y ! \/ k/} -/ § _\ ! s\ - [[ , a s[ [f «; 2 , , , _ « (y }® } !_: \ \f \E /9 /; : -® / R m co\ \ \ \ \� / m ( \ - - _ -_ - _ ! - -< a 2 0 2 } _ _ _ , 3 ; $ m f Cl ; \ Z \ \ -13 ` § - IT5 j P R\ ) f / $ \ / --i / « f 2 U) ) \ ( 2 2 ) : % f _ , - : , > C) { § [ : LD, \ \ \ } w \ ) T 7 7 \3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IQ ` /\ } £& zw z2 zM 2® \:E6 s»&» > «/ 0 D0 T ;: ; ( 3 3 \ \� 2\\ -O / \ \� \ \ § \ \ \ § \ \ z ) / 6 / ) ) + / > Cl) s > , _ \ \_ \ co ~ 0\ \ � j \ � cl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m \ 0 0 0 ■ ■ / § CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On August 8, 2017, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On August 4, 2017, a copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 21800 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar. CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 4, 2017, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community Development Dept. CD:Azstel IeAafl idnv itposting.doc Golden Diamond Springs, LLC do Excel Property Management Services, Inc. 9034 W. Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood CA 90069 August 8, 2017 City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Re: McDonald's — 205 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, CA Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program — Planning Case No. PL 2016-161 To Whom It May Concern: Kindly allow this letter to serve as an endorsement of McDonald's Corporation in regards to their request for approval of DBMC Sections 22.48, 22.58, and 22.36.060. Our entity, Golden Diamond Springs, LLC, has had the privilege of owning the adjacent parcel, including shopping center, over the course of many years. In this time, McDonald's Corporation has proved to be professional, cooperative, and a pleasure to work with as a neighboring tenant. We are in full support of McDonald's Corporation and give our positive recommendation for their endeavors that will improve the City of Diamond Bar. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, By: fiver Gabay 310-270-9242 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: T3 TO: Planning Commission SPEAKER NAME: C- PRz 105 (Please print clearly) re/('Rd print clearly) SUBJECT: `v! c /Don/14 i 0 IS DATE: `§ /1/r7 211 I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Signa r� Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary_ Thank you. VO,L [ ARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: �- l SUBJECT: I t\fryllo TO: Planning Commission DATE: SPEAKER NAME: � (Please prriP�GL77 I arty) ADDRESS: b� ` I'o ck (Please print clearly) I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above �.tn�c�u Y21 Signature Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: '7 r SUBJECT: TO: Planning Commission SPEAKER NAME:_ print L I DATE:— (Please print clearly) I would like to address the -Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Signature Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you.